Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983/03/09 - Agenda PacketP-T a ' I ' '- QTY OF RANG iO CUCANIONCA AGENDA 1977 ACTIONS Approved 5 -0 -0 L HM El IV. WEDNESDAY • MARCH 9, 1983 LIONS PAztR CorL".jNlTy CE:iTn -.R 9161 BASE LME, RANCHO CIICcMNGA, Pledge of Allegiance Pall Call. Commissioner Barker X Commissioner King _T_ Commissioner McNiel Approval of Sdrrutes February 17, 1983 Annormcements 1 7:00 p.m. CALIFORNIA Commissioner Rempel X Commissioner Stout " x V. Public hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related protect. Please wait to be recognize-4 by-the Chairman Chairma and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Approved 5 -0 -0 as amend -A. ed - to provide addl. access on W. bondary from market rate apts; ramp areas; stucco fascia at top of units; limitation of den- sity to that originally proposed (37). WA-11 - - �-�i• +inn -,m request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from Medium -High Residential (14-24 dwelling units /acre) to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units /acre) for the development of 161 affordable senior citizen apartments on approximately 4.55 acres of land located west of Archibald, and north of Base Line - APN 202 - 151 -34 (continued from Planning Commission meeting of February 23, 1983). Approved 5 -0 -0 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPNIE T 8 1 (PARCEL MAl' 7827 - CALMARK - A change _oT zone from R -3 /PD Multiple Family Residential/Plarmed Development) to R -3 /SO (Multiple Family Residential /Senior Overlay) and the development of 269 apartment units, of which 161 are intended for senior citizens, on 9.78 acres of lend generally located west of Archibald and north of Base Line - Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 579 - APN 202 - 151 -34 (continued from Planning Commission meeting of February 23, 1983). Plane.ing Commission Agenda March 9, !983 Page 2 Approved 5 -0 -0 with referC. PARCEL MAP 7827 - LEWIS PROPERTIES INC - A division ence to senior citizen of 9.78 acres into 3 parcels within the R -3 zone generally parcels. located west of Archibald Avenue, north of Base Line -APN 202 - 151 -34. Approved 5 -0 -0 D. E14- WRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7812 - PENBO, INCORPORATED - A residential subdivision o` .585 acres within the R -1 zone into 3 parcels located on the south side of Devon Street at Kinlocic Avenue - APN 208 - 851 -09, 10. (Continued from Planning Commission meeting of February 9, 1983). s E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL nl °• ?a Approved 5 -0 -0 AMERON. INC. - A division of 6.2 acres into 3 parcela within Subarea 15 of the Industrial Specific Plan generally located on the south side of Arrow Route, west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 229 - 121 -32 and 229 - 131 -13. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED Approved 5 -0 -0 with addl. VF.YELOPMENT 83-02 - TENTATIVE TRACT 12362) - condition that area to N. RANCHO CENTER - A change of zone from R -3 Multiple of tract be maintained Family Resident' to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family in a clean condition. Residential/Planned Development) and the development of 88 units arranged as four- plexes on 6.4 acres located south of Base Line, on the west side of Hellman - APN 208 - 011 -02, 04, 71. Approved 5 -0 -0 G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-01 - CUCAMONGA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - The development of a 2,660 square foot christian education building for the Cucamonga United Methodist Church on 3.18 acres of land in the R -1 zone located at 7690 Archibald Avenue - APN 208 - 041 -29. Approved 5 -0 -0 H. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-02 - NAZARENE CHURCH - The development of a 10,000 square foot educational building for the Foothills Community Chu ch of the Nazarene on 8.89 acres of land in the R -1 -8500 zone located at 9944 Highland Avenue - APN 291- 055 -41. VL New Easiness Approved 5 -0 -0 L ENViiROU N1ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83-0 - BARYON - The development of an 80,005 square foot office building on 13.22 acres of land in the Industrial Paris category- (Subarea 7), located at the southeast earner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. * This project falls within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Area. Planning Commission Agenda ,,larch 9, 1983 Page 3 VILL Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. 1i'IIi . Adjournment (10:20 p.m.) Thp. Plcnming Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. Commission requested review of Design Review Committee procedure to a later time during day and a rotation system for service on committee. Staff to study and bring back to meeting of March 23. Commendation Resolution and plaque presented to outgoing Chairman Jeff icing, who resigned. .5 ?i 0M1IUIIU INURRIbORAL AI CRT' CITY OF RA24CHO CUCJ1 ,a ? CITY OF VI> R kNCHO CUCkNIONGA PLANNING CONEI�`� IISSiOLT AGE DA WEDNESDAY MARCH 9, 1983 7:00 P.M. LIONS PARY. C010MZTY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE, RANCBO CL'CLMONGA, CALIFORNIA th A 4 O �1 L Pledge of Allegiance lL Roll Call Commissioner Barker Commissioner King Commissioner McNiel III. Approval of Minutes February 17, 1983 IV. Announcements Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Stout V. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. PIease wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. A. 2746ENTAL General Plan Land Use Plan from Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units /acre) to High Residential (24 -30 dwelling miits /acre) for the development of 161 affordable senior citizen apartments on approximately 4.55 acres of land located west of Archibald, and north of Base Line - APN 202 - 151 -34 (continued from Planning Commission meeting of February 23, 1983). B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMEN 53 -01 ;PARCEL MAP 7827 - CALMARK - A change of zone from R -3 /PD Multiple Family Residential/Planned Development) to R -3 /SO (Multiple Family Residential/Senior Overlay) and the development of 269 apartment louts, of which 161 are intended for senior citizens, on 9.78 acres of land generally located west of Archibald and north of Base Line - Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5792 - APN 202 - 151 -34 (continued from Planning Commission meeting of February 23, 1983). a, 8M w •ate .: _. _ — r�r Planning Commission AgendR March 9, 1983 Page 2 C. PARCEL MAP 7827 - LEWIS PROPERTIES INC. - A division of 9.78 acres into 3 parcels within the R -3 zone generally located west of Archibald Avenue, north of Base Line - APN 202 - 151 -34. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7812 - PENE) INCORP '5RA'TE.D - A residential subdivision of .585 acres within the P. -1 zone into 3 parcels located on the south side of Devon Street at liirlocic Avenue -APN 208 - 851 -09, 10. (Continued from Planning Commission meeting of February 9, 1983). E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL TVIAP 7847 - AMERON, INC. - A division of 6.2 acres into 3 parcels within Subarea 15 of the Industrial Specific Plan generally located on the south side of Arrow Route, west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 229 - 121 -32 and 229 - 131 -13. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 83-02 - (T7: NTATIV£ 'TRACT 32362 xLr"Nt,nv t.Erci -mn - A cnange of zone from R -3 (Multiple Family Residential ) to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential/Planned Development) and the development of 88 units arranged as four - plexes on 6.4 acres located south of Base Line, on the west side of Hellman - APN 208 - 011 -02, 04, 71. G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-01 - a.aa:a uvaia.aa a.a t.n — ine Qevelopment of a'1,660 square foot Christian education building for the Cucamorga United Methodist Church on 3.18 acres of land in the R -1 zone located at 7690 Archibald Avenue - APN 208 -041 -29. H. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -02 - NAZARENE CHURCH - The development of a 10,000 square foot educativnii .`>-,:ild :.ng for the Foothills Community Church of the Nazarene on 8.89 acres of lard in the R -1 -8500 zone located at 9944 Highland Avenue - APN 201 -055 -41. y M I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPM'-NT REVIEW 83-03 - BARTON - The development of an 30,000 square foot office building on 13.22 acres of land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 7), located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Fcothill Boulevard. " This project Calls within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Area. . r Planning Commission Agenda `1 --rch 9, 1983 Page 3 1L Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VIII. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. .. -. . ONTARIO 14ICRMAT 90MAL AIWOM!- CITY OF RAYOCHO CITY OF RANCHO CL'CILMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MIWJTES Regular Adjourned NPeting February 17, 1963 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Jeff King called the ragular adjourned meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7 p.=. he meeting was held at the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Oucamonga. Chairman King then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: David Barker, Larry Mc Niel, Herman Rempel, Dennis Stout, Jeff King ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None STAFF PRESENT: Tim Beedle, Senior Planner; Rick Gomez, City Planner; Edward A. Hopson, City Attorney; Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer; Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner; Joan Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer Tim Beedle advised that the last two sections of the regulatory provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan would be reviewed by Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner. Mr. Kroutil reviewed the special regulations regarding trees and windrows and then went on to the section on architectural and design standards reviewing the standards of those pertaining to future projects and those which applied to existing standards. He explained that restrictive architectural standards would apply should a developer choose to develop under optional development standards. Further, that the most restrictive standards are found on commercial developments and explained the definition of "barn style" to the Commission. !r. Kroutil advised that the architectural and design standards article contains provisions to encourage the preservation of historical. structures within the Etiwanda area and that the Plan identifies those structures. Chairman King asked the Commission for their comments. Commissioner Rempel stated that several pages Were skipped, 5 -5 and 5 -6 which : deal With setbacks and height hmiLs next to exi:;�i:+g ' - ar - C«es. He raised concern that setback conditions are written for churches; however, the reciprocal was not considered if a church is built next to an existing house. He did not feel this should be put in the Plan. Commissioner McNiel asked if under the E -R section 5.4, should it not read one or less. He indicated that there is a conflict. Further, on page 2.5 -3 up to one, and in fact, reads a density of less than one dwelling unit per acre. Mr. Kroutii ^epiied that this should be changed to ^ead "one or less ". Chairman King opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Stout commented on architectural standards contained in section 5.44 and the language in : ection .802 relative to neighborhood commercial facilities with respect to barn style architecture. Commissioner Stout thought that this st;le should be used on any commercial type, not just neighborhood commercial. Nr. Kroutil asked if this should pertain to office commercial as well. Commissioner Stout replied that it should and further that it should look unique. Commissioner Stout stated that with regard to the architectural type for residential areas, Etiwanda should have the same style throughout to be consistent. He felt that an architectural theme containing the same style should be encouraged. Chairman King asked Commissioner Rempel for clarification of his previous comments. Commissioner Rempel replied that if limitations are made on residential development where there are existing churches that the reciprocal should also be made. He stated what bothers him is the delineation of churches and rot schools. He stated that this should be the same for residential. He further stated that the restrictions on development next to churches should be deleted from the text and taken up under design. review. Mr. Beedle stated that restrictions were put into the text after hearing from the Etiwanda Specific Plan Committee regarding the affect on existing churches in the Etiwanda area. Mr. Beedle further stated that it was the Committee which put in setbacks and stated this should be considered whenever there is development around churches. ter. Beedle stated that this language is not fount, in other ordinances of the City but the Specific Plan provides an opportunity to deal with special circumstances in Etiwanda. Mr. Beedle indicated that these can also be focused upon through the design review process. Chairman King stated that the community feels that the churches have special significance and should be planned for setbacks. Mr. Beedle stated that in one case, the Buddhist Temple is adjacent to commercial /professional so it would be important to have setbacks there. Commissioner Stout stated that school uses would have the same problem. Planning Commission Minutes -2- February 17, 1983 Commissioner Rempel stated that if you say houses must be so far away, the turnabout is that the residents may say they don't want churches to be built too close. Chairman King asked the Commission if reciprocal provisions should be placed in the text. Commissioner Rempel felt that the setback provisions for development around churches should be deleted from the text and taken up in design review instead. He indicated that special language should be contained in the tent that these areas are sensitive to special uses in the community. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. James Frost, Council member, stated that as a representative of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Committee the specific reference to cbjrcnz- as 72de because there was an opportunity to make them good neighbors and not have them become part of a retrofit program. Further, that the two churches are the Etiwanda Congregational Church with the railroad tracks which provide automatic buffering and. there is no difficulty there because the church is expected to expand to the south. Fowever, with regard to the Temple, because of its uniqueness, architecturally and philosophically as well as aesthetically, it needs to be looked at as a :•esource within the community. He indicated that the Committee felt that the Temple facilities should be allowed to flourish and it was appropriate that spacial provizionr, be considered within the text of the Plan. Chairman King asked the Commission for general consensus on the language proposed by the Etiwanda Specific Plan Committee. Commissioner Mc Niel stated that he is inclined to agree with Commissioner Rempel that conditions might ,exist at some time in the future whereby the same conditions would apply to other development. He felt that the specific language regarding setbacks adjacent to churches should be stricken from '.he text. Commissioner Barker stated that accepting the fact that there may be situations down the road that they don't quite understand, he is concerned that by taking out the specific language, it may leave a document that had no teeth. He indicated that he is not really comfortable with that because the Commission has no way of knowing whether at some future time the Design Review Committee may be disbanded. He indicated further that he would like to see something with more strength than a general statement to the effect that the Commission is sensitive to the churches and schools within the community. Planning Commission Minutes -3- February 17, 1983 Commissioner Rempel stated that he did not know the size cf tie lots involved, but the way the Plan is written, if existing residences are adjacent to a church use and there is a lot 90 feet wide and a church builds abutting it, and the church builds to the south you nor. have taken 50 feet from that lot. He indicated that the language is too restrictive in this case and he has a problem with it. Commissioner Rempel stated that he can't see the difference between a church use and a residential use in actuality. Chairman King stated that he is in favor of making the language more general. Co=issioner Rempel stated that this should be deleted under .203 paragraph B and that a shouted be changed to a 15 -foot setback to be required on two sides of residential, uses rather than one side. why this should apply only to residential_ uses. Commissioner Rempel replied that he thought it was an error in the text and that the Plan intended to cover all types of uses adjacent to churches,not just residential. Commissioner Stout stated that if Mr. Rempel is making these recommendations regarding all future development that the reference to residential should be deleted or modified. Mr. Rempel stated he would agree to remove references to residential development. Commissioner Barker asked if the Commission is going to slide in a sensitivity statement. Commissioner Rempel stated that the wording might be that the City is aware of the sensitivities to special types of buildings such as schools, churches and others added later on, but that the setbacKs for those types of buildings should be a minimum of 15 feet. Chairman King stated that this would accomplish just what the Commission does not want. Further, that if the Commission wants to be sensitive to schools and churches it will be better to get rid of all numbers and make a statement relatire to sensitivity and use discretion in administering it. Commissioner Rempel stated that he would change the wording to indicate that when reviewing plans for development adjacent to uses such as schools and churches, the City shall consider such plans with sensitivity to the use. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. There was consensus among the Commission on Commissioner Rempel's recommended textual change with all proposed development adjacent to churches, ,chools and similar uses being subject to critical review at the time of Design Review. There was consensus among the Commission an Commissioner McNiel's recommended change of one or less in the E -R district. Planning Commission Minutes -4- February 17, 1983 There was consensus among the !o=iz.°, i0_- re,,- ard:.n-g Commissioner StoL'tlS extension of architectural style of barn type tc professional as well as other commercial uses and convenience stores. Cnairnan King stated that Commissioner Stout would like to require that type of architecture contained within the optional standards on all types of residential. Commissioner Stout stated that he felt if the architectural standards within the otiwanda Specific Plan are to be unique then the architectural standards and :style should be uniform. Cha',.rmar: King stated he does not agree and cited Alta Loma and the sameness that currently exists. Purther, that there should be optional standards and that the developer may do as he wishes; if he does not like the architectural style in the optional standards, then he does not get the peres. Cccimissioner Rempel stated he agreed taeause in one area there would be a problem -- that of cost and maintenance especiplly when you get into low- and - moderate income housing. Commissioner Barker stated that his concern is compatibility and the Commission gets back to the issue of design review and there should be some means to assure compatibility of dcsign. Commissioner Barker felt that this should be the responsibility of design review and did not feel that there should be a limitation to the styles allowed in the community. There was no consensus among the Commission on modifying the architectural and design section of the Etiwanda Specific Plan for residential construction, and the Draft was left unchanged. Mr. Kroutil reviewed the propose6 revisions contained within pages 6-71 and the concerns expressed by the Commission at the previous hearing. He asked the Commission to resolve the definition of acre. Further, that the CUP is intended for use only in the low- medium and medium density ranges. Mr. Kroutil explained how the deiirition of net /gross acreage needs to be tightened down because in the lower density areas it is theoretically possible to have up to 20 dwellings on a 10 -acre site as opposed to 18. He stated that under the proposal suggested by Commissioner Rempel at the last meeting the density would be increased under the ER or VL ranges and suggested that the Commission use the wording "gross acreages may be considered for density calculations" as an added incentive under Optional Standards- Chairman King asked if what Mr. Kroutil is saying is "may" rather than "shall ". Mr. Kroutil replied that by having this wording there would be no guarantees that the developer would get the maximum; the Commission would use their discretion. Planning Commission Minutes -5- February 17, 1983 Commissioner Stout asked if since the only problem appears to u2 with the ER and VL, could this be done just for these two areas and rot the other 3. Mr. Kroutil stated that it would be possible to do this but it may be awkward to administer over t:e counter. Chairman icing stated that the issues to be considered by the Commission are the Optional Standards and whether it goes through the normal planning process or a CUP; whether stronger standards will be imposed as it relates to the Optional Standards; the consideration of gross or net ar_reage; equestrian incentives and the trail hook up to Victoria. Chairman King opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissiorer Rempel stated that he did not see a need for a CUP. Commissioner Barker asked what the advantage is in high density areas, stating that he was not sure what kind of package will come through and by making a change it could have a major effect on the site area and he would have the same problems with it. He indicated that he would have no problem with it if it does not go beyond. Commissioner Rempel stated that the only thi:,g a CUP does is advartise. . Gomez stated that it forces you into a public hearing. Commissioner Rempel stated that if you have a tract map you must have a pub l,�Jc hearing. Chairman King asked when Commissioner Barker's thought regarding the CUP becomes relevant with the exception of the advertising aspect. Commissioner Rempel asked Mr. Hopson, if there is a condition it the CC&R's, would this be covered under the reading of the tract map. Mr. Hopson replied that if the project is in the low- medium range you may not have CC&R's. However, if you have a condominium project, for example, where there is a common area, you will have CC&R's but If you have single family residential without a common arez you will not have the CC&R's. Chairman King asked what advantage a CUP has over the present process of deign review for any subdivision relative to the hearing. Mr. Hopson replied that he does not see any advantage and the only thing that it is used for is to call the project before the Planning Commission. Further, as a practical matter you would not want to do that because it would foul up the lending if real estate people knew that the Commission could call this up at any time. Planning Commission Minutes -6- February 17, 1983 Chairman King asked what the Commission wished to do about gross or net acreage. Commissioner Stout stated that densities should be based on gross acreages for the ER or Very Low categories because there is more flexibility, but remain as is in other categories. There was consensus among the Commission or. this issue. Chairman King felt there should be stronger equestrian incentives. Commissioner Barker stated that the whole area is an equestrian overlay zone. Chairman King stated that in an attempt to encourage equestrian uses are there any other amenities to get equestrian uses so that if a developer goes ail out he could develop high rises. Mr. Cecil Johnson, landowner, recommended all the incentives they could get for equestrian facilities. Further, that anyone willing to put in a training track is adding benefit to the whole community even though it is individually owned if it is held open to the community. Chairman King asked if he is talking about dedication, of public space. Mr. Johnson replied not necessarily that but that a training track would have a great deal of worth to the community. Mr. Kroutil stated that as far as the concept of providing incentives is concerned you can go as far as you want but that the Co=ission should keep in mind that the area in question is already up to u per acre. Further, that unless incentives other than density such as waiving fees which seems appropriate, there is nothing else you can do except provide more density. Commissioner Rempel stated that it is not a prerogative of the Planning Commission to reduce fees and therefore is not a perc that they can give. Commissioner Stout stated that a master plan is being required for the area. He felt that one of the peres that car be given to the developer is a designation of equestrian commercial so that a small tack store can be located there. Chairman King stated that he felt adequate incentives have been provided and if the Commission goes any further, they will be doling out freebees. Commissioner Rempel stated he did not think that is what Commissioner Stout is talking about but that it probably would not be a possibility without a CUP, anyway- Planning Commission Minutes -7- February 17, 1983 Mr. Beedle stated that a provision could be added to allow a tack store to operate in the area under the master plan approach which would allow some commercial to be developed which would be geared to equestrian. He indicated further that the text could be massaged to address this if this is what the Commission desires. Commissioner Barker stated that a tremendous amount of tax money gees out of the community and he would like to see these taxes stay within the City limits by allowing commercial geared to equestrian uses in this area. Chairman King stated that this type of use, if properly done, would be appropriate. He indicated that Design Review would have to look at this closely in terms of landscaping and setbacks so that it almost fades into the countryside and becomes non - existent rather than become a commercial setting. The consensus of the Commission relative to allowing equestrian commercial was that it should be allowed in a limited sense and only as a part of a Master Planned Equestrian Development. Mr. Kroutil reviewed the proposed trail hook up for Victoria for the Commission. Chairman King asked why it is felt the trail along the railroad tra ks is not good. Mr. K-routil replied that under the current conditions some horses may react in an unfriendly manner to train noise and that it is a matter of public safety. Commissioner Barker stated that there is no guarantee that if the railroad tracks are used for a trail there will be access. Commissioner Rempel stated that under the General Plan this was also proposed as a possible commuter line. Commissioner Stout asked what the grade separation_ is. Mr. Kroutil stated tracks are at ER on -foot above grade. Commissioner Stout stated that this would be very hazardous. Mrs. Kleinman stated that on the map the trail is shown going over the Devore Freeway and asked if the land there is being condemned or if this is just a proposal. Mr. Kroutil replied that most of this trail is on flood control land and what Mrs. Kleinman is referring to is the stretch along Victoria and adjacent to the freeway right- of -way. Mr. Kroutil stated that this is land that would sit idle until the property develops and at that time whatever is in the Specific Plan would be required as a condition of approval. Planning Commission Minutes -3- February 17, 1983 Chairman King asked the Commission for their comments regarding the trail hook up. Commissioner Rempel stated that he has a serious problem with a trail along Victoria. He felt it should be north of the school. Chairman, King asked how this is being connected south of Victoria Parkway. Commissioner Rempel replied that he did not remember and asked if there is a trail along the green belt. Chairman_ King stated that he did not think equestrian uses fit in with the general concept of Victoria Parkway. Commissioner Rempel stated that he did not think that the trail has access at the west end of Victoria Parkway. Mr. Kroutil stated that provisions have been made to hold a 10-15 foot section on the Etiwanda side of Victoria even though the street does not continue. Commissioner Rempel stated that he is talking about the west end of Victoria Parkway where it stops, not the Etiwanda end. Mr. Kroutil stated that this is a Question of the Victoria Community Plan. Commissioner Rempel stated that there may be a problem starting there. Commissioner Mcyiel asked how much land is available along the railroad itself. M^. Kroutil stated that the General Plan calls for a community trail the entire length of the City from Grove to where it crosses 1: -15. He further stated that in Alta Loma and Cucamonga some areas are built all the way up to the right - of-way and in those areas the trail would have to be within the Southern Pacific right -of -way. M.r. Kroutil stated that there may be a problem with getting Southern Pacific to allow this use. Following brief discussion, it was the consensus of the Commission to leave the trail as shown along the railroad tracks not to preclude the possibility that it may be used at some future point, and where another trail is needed, to provide for it to hook up to Victoria Parkway. There was discussion among the Commission of where an additional trail should be acquired. Jeff Sceranka voiced his concern with putting in an equestrian trail along a freeway system and the attendant safety considerations. Mrs. Kleinman felt that a trail along either the railroad or the freeway are bad ideas. Planning Commissi ^r. Minutes -9- February 17, 1983 Mr. Dave Flocker stated that both alternatives 2 ar.d 3 bring the equestrian trail along Etiwanda Avenue and basically he thought the general consensus of the Etiwanda Committee was not to have it run along Etiwanda Avenue. Further, to bring an equestrian trail through a non - equestrian area is unfair especially where there is no benefit. He indicated it would require a developer to pay for something which he would not be allowed to use. Mr. Kroutil pointed out the alignment of the trail system to Mrs. Kleinman indicating that what she had been referring to is an alternate and that the original plan calls for the trail along East Etiwanda Creek. Further, that the Equestrian Committee wanted to be sure of a connection on the Etiwanda side of the freeway in the event that Fontana did not agree. He indicated that if Fontana could guarantee a connection along the Creek it would be best. Chairman_ King asked that regardless of anything else, is the Commission in agreement that the trail should be kept along the railroad track. The Commissio-,, agreed with this concept. Chairman King asked if the Commission wished to extend the trail beyond the overlay area. There was consensus among the Commission for alternative three. Mrs. Kleinman stated that if a horse trail is put in along the railroad track it will make it difficult for them to develop that area. Mr. Johnson asked if the easement could be reduced to something less than 15 feet. Mr. Kroutil stated that the Etiwanda Plan uses city -wide standards for trail width, slopes, and drainage, and generally speaking, the design is tried and true in terms of the dimensions and treatment. With regard to lessening the 15 -foot easement, Mr. Kroutil felt that the easement should remain 15 feet unless specific site conditions dictate otherwise. Mr. Johnson asked about consensus on Cherry Avenue rail Extension. Commissioner Barker stated that the Commission could include language to bolster the trail easement along the west side of the freeway, south of Victoria and connect through to Fontana. Commissioner Stout stated that he agreed. Mrs. Kleiman asked what the incentives are to put in a ti-ail system. Chairman King replied that it depends on where your property is or. a trail system. Planning Commission Minutes -10- Febriary 17, 1983 Mrs. Kleinman stated that the Commission is in effect condemning a piece of land for a trail system. Chairman King replied that he did not believe so. Chairman King then went on to the issue of Cherry Avenue Equestrian Trail Extension. Commissioner Barker asked what is on the other side of I -15 :Ln Fontana. Mr. Kroutil replied it is an industrial park land use between Route 30 and I -15 on Fontana's General Plan. Commissioner Barker stated that there is no logical reason to go in with an Equestrian Trail. There was consensus on this matter. 8:35 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed 3:48 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. Otto Kroutil summarized the Draft Enviror_mental Impact Report comments received from the various public entities. He also reviewed staff responses and recommendations for changes to the EIR. Chairmn King asked how the EIR would be revamped in view of the comments received on the specific areas mentioned. Mr. Kroutil replied that the staff reports prepared for the _. . -3sion included recommended specific changes and this would be added to the Draft EIR and would be forwarded to the City council for their review and certification. Mr. Beedle stated that under include responses to them in complete, recommended to the are to be utilized must also those mitigation measures wb added to the Specific Plan. CEQR the City is obligea to receive comments and the EIR report. The report must be certified as City Council and the mitigation measures which be included. Mr. Beedle stated further, that ich the Commission feels are appropriate will be Chairman King opened the public hearing. There he:ng no cc=ents the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Stout asked about whether 7527 dwelling units were the worst case scenario and whether it includes any bonuses. Mr. Kroutil stated that this is the worst case scenario in that it is the riv ring Commission Minutes -11- February 17, 1983 maximum number of dwellings possible, and that in reality the actual number of dwellings would be less. Commissioner Stout asked what would happen if minor changes are made to the Plan, would it then require a new assessment on the zim. Mr. Kroutil replied that the only time that would happen is if it is a significant change. Chairman King asked if there is general consensus among the Commission to accept the EIR as presented, concurring with the recommendations contained within the staff report and what the Commission has before them. Commissioner Re=pel asked that the revised street calculations be included in the EIR. Mr. Krcutil replied that they would be. There was general consensus that the EIR be accepted as presented and with the revisions presented to the Commission. Mr. Beedle reviewed the General Plan Amendment 83 -01B for the Commission. Chairman King opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Chairman King stated that this evening the Commission had reviewed the Regulatory Provisions and Implementation Sections of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and asked if there was general consensus on the Policy and Conceptual Plan. He indicated that the Commission had reviewed four chapters this evening, the introduction, goals, policies and objectives, setting and conceptual plan and asked if there was general consensus. Chairman King opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by M,-Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -25, recommending certification of the EIR prepared for General Plan Amendment 83 -01 -B and for the Etixar_da Specific Plan to the City Council. Motion: Moved by Mc Niel, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -26, recommending the adoption of General Plan Amendment 83 -01B, affecting the land use and development element of the General Plan to the City Council. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Mc Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83,27, recommending approval of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, as modified, to the City Council. Planning Commission Minutes -12- February 17, 1983 Mr. Beedle commended staff, specifically, Mr. Kroutil for the work over the last two years in the preparation of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and to the Commission and Committee for their efforts. f # f f Chairman Ring stated that he had forwarded a letter to Mayor Jon Mikels advising of his resignation from the Planning Commission to become effective March 10, 1983. Chairman King cited the reason for his resignation as his intention to run for the City Council indicating he did not wish to impair his honesty and integrity nor create any conflict of interest. f f 3 f f Motion: Moved by P,empel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adjourn. f f f f i 9:05 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez Acting Secretary Planning Commission Minutes —13— February 17, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,'VIONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 9, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Il SUMMARY: In reviewing the Senior Housing Overlay District at its meeting of March 2, 1983, the City Council used the opportunity to express their concerns regarding the Calmark project. Attached is a memorandum summarizing the Council's concerns with the SHOD ordinance and the project itself. Based upon the amount of concern expressed by the Commission and Council regarding the project design, it would seem to be in the best interests of all parties to continue the above - described items to allow staff to meet with Commissioners and Councilmen individually to discuss their concerns. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission continue General Plan Amendment 83 -03, Planned Development 83 -01, and Parcel Map 7827 to the March 23, 1983 agenda. 1 y,oeubmi teed, ty Il anner :DC:jr hments CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 8, 1983 TO: FROM: 8Y: SUBJECT Members of the Planning Col s ion Rick Gomez, City Planner Rick Narks, Associate Plarmerl i SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DI�TRICT: F Vin. oil "w 1977 ON CITY COUNCIL On March 2, 1983 at its regularly scheduled meeting, the City Council reviewed the Senior Housing Overlay District Ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission,. The City Council expressed the Following concerns regarding the ordinance: A. Fast Trackin Process - Concern regarding the definition of the term an why tt wou 3 ripply to senior housing developments only (the general consensus was to eliminate its use). B. Development Agreements - Ability of the City via this legal instrument to restrict the occupancy of the units to senior citizens only and to keep rents in the affordable price range; need for the City to minotor the rents charged for units. C. Development Incentives - Should be given exclusively to senior housing units and no other units, even when a project includes the market rate and affordable units. D. Administrative Guidelines - City Council wants to review the Administrative Guidelines prior to approving the ordinance and is especially concerned that o location criteria be explicit o "tight" definitions be used, especially defining senior citizens and occupants. The City Council directed staff to send the Administrative Guidelines to the Plannino Commission and bring the guidelines and a revised ordinance back to the - Council at its April 6, 1983 meeting. Staff will send the Administrative Guidelines to the Planning Commission for review at its March 23, 1983 meeting. RG:RM:jr V, Calmark Development Caporatkm n e Am ewe March 2, 1953 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 A'_"TN Dar. Colman Assistant Planner Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G' Cii;,N,UNITY DEVE10WENT DEPT. MAR 1993 hi.5 PM} 7181911610 112111Z1314A 6 A Via Federal Express Re: Response to Planning Commission Concerns Dear Dan: Calmark Development Corporation would like to address each of the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission and the extent that the modified site plan incorporating these ideas. o Adequate Bufferinq Between Market Rate Units and Senior Citizen Units - The two projects are now separated by a publicly dedicated street. The recreation buildings have been further separated along this street. Each project's Parking and traffic circulation pattern are independent of each other. Finally, with the reduction in the number of market rate units the interfacing of one project along the other (the common perimeter between projects) has been reduced as well as the potential number of people causing any kind of ,impact. o Pitch of the Stairs - The stairs are designed well below the allowable pitch to provide easy access by the elderly residents. The rise is restricted to 6 1/3 inches and the tread is at least 12 inches. In addition each stairway has a landing half way down. o width of Walkways - From our experience the width of the walkways as designed (4 ft.) are plenty wide for two of our residents to stroll side by side through the grounds. In fact they are wide enough for someone to walk beside a person in a wheel chair. o Texture of Walkways - The sidewalks are a rough skid re- sistant finish and the up stairs walks have a Murcote covering, also a skid repistant material. 2121 ClovedieW Blvd.. Suite 202. P.O. Scx 2128. Santa Monica. Califomia 90406 (213) 453 -1773 07 , Dan Co1•nan March 2, 1983 Page two • Size of Recreation Room - The modified plan include some additional senior citizen apartmo.,rc so we would increase the size of the recreation building to around 3,000 ex- clusive of the manager's apartment. This is based upon our experience of building size fcr number of residents compiled from our other existing Heritage Park Projects. • Parking .3eparation - The modified plan segregates the parking .�,f each project to prevent any parking interface problems. o Parking '?atterns - The modified plan changes the patterns and circ-.xlation of both project's parking, such that each project :_s independent of each other. There is no longer any common private drives which could have caused an in- terface problem. If speed within either project becomes a problerz it could be solved with the installation of speed burips. • Block Off a _Portion of Senior Citizens Parking Area - This has been accomplished by the redesign of the parking lay- out. The problem of common drives is no longer a problem. • Locate the Senior Citizen Recreation Building More Cen- tral - This was accomplished with the modification to the room. The recreation building was placed at the end of the cul -de -sac in approximately the center of the plan. In this position it still provides the needed access to the center of activity for the seniors. • Relation of Buildings to Parking - Additional parking has been provided in the form of a parking bay near the recre- ation building to spread the parking throughout the site. This seemed to be the best compromise given the concerns of segregated and independent parking and maximized open space. o Benefits Given to Developer. Citv Not ar_tt; nn The City ,riginally contactea Calmark, after hearing about our success at providing affordable senior citizen housing for other communities, to see if senior citizen housing was viable in Rancho Cucamonga. Calmark has de- veloped a plan, refine=d with seven years of research, to provide affordable senior housing, and to date, are the only ones able to do so without the aid of federal grants or subsidies. This is what the City is receiving, a con- cept planned and refined over many years and almost 1,600 units, a plan to provide affordable senior citizen housing. rt: 4, ' Dan Colman March 2, 1983 Page three We believe that with the most recent modification to the plan that we have activated the most harmonious balance of your most recent concerns as well as those expressed over the last six months of planning. We urge you to approve this plan and provide the much needed senior housing in Rancho Cucamonga. Sincerely, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Project Manager LP;mk 0 %I L RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ADOPTED LAND USE PLAN OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, that Rancho Cucamonga has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the General Plan encourages affordable housing projects; and WHEREAS, the proposed General Plan Amendment will result in the construction of affordable senior citizen apartment units; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Planning Commission policies; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not be materially injurious or detrimental to surrounding property; and WHEREAS, Section 65361 of the California Government Code provides for amendments of mandatory elements or a General Plan at any time during a calendar year for an affordable residential development, as specified in said section. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve the following Amendment to the Land Use Plan of the General Plan. SECTION 1: General Plan Amendment 83 -03: An amendment of the General P al n Lan_cT Use Plan in the area west of Archibald, and north of Base Lire, further described as Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 7827, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A ". This area shall be changed from Medium -High Residential to High Residential. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this Genera Pan Amendment will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on March 23, 1983. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: ecretary o t e annzng Commission Resolution No. Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and reg0 arly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of March, 1583, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMIS_ ONERS: .: 3nM3Ar ' 1 i I 1 • 4 I [ Y j 1 - ! � •� c\ � \ J i 0 a V 4 \ 1 E fm a:= is _ _ \ •. t`. is = J � r' pA a% mess �=•= ifis 31_ � �� \t L T a Ctt co _ G \a a _ __ CL- ¢ a__ -j tit LLI � sa= tit I--- - z aTa = Y j 1 - ! � •� c\ � \ J i 0 a V 4 \ 1 E fm a:= is _ _ \ •. t`. is = J � r' pA a% mess �=•= ifis 31_ � �� \t L T a Y j 1 - ! � •� c\ � \ J i 0 a V 4 \ 1 E fm a:= is _ _ \ •. t`. is = J � r' pA a% mess �=•= ifis 31_ � �� \t L I - � (J I 1 r 1 1 1 1 JTI- t 1 L _ �j a u n - o - n T� tf i .sal -�'y iw ..ssw a * r s w S Ir E a w _� M . ' w 1 AE]I�IIT UIMIR'S F \IA RANCHO CUCAMONGA i �� vM*IOis CALMARK DEVELOPMENT t CI'T'Y OF RA2N -CHO CUCAMONGA MEMORAN0UM 11 DATE: March 9, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, pity Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner, SUBJECT: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 83- 01 /GEN RAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -03 - SUMMARY: The Planning Commission, at its regularly scheduled meeting of February 23, 1983, continued the above- described items to allow the applicant an opportunity to address the Commission's concerns regarding the project design. A detailed staff report analyzing the proposed revisions will be hand delivered to the Commission prior to the March 9, 1983 agenda. Please find attached a copy of the original staff report. n L' J fly_ submitted, I City Planner RG /DC /jr Attachments: February 23, 1983 Staff Report 0 ITEMS A & 8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 23, 3.983 Of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: FNVT0nMMCkMA1 (Multiple Family Residential /PlannedoT Development) 3 to R -3 /SO (Multiple Family Residential /Senior Overlay) and the development of 269 apartment units of which 161 are intended for senior citizens, on 9.78 acres generally located west of Archibald, north of Base Line - Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5792 - APN 202 - 151 -34. Related File: GPA 83 -03 - Calmark; Parcel Map 7827 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a planned development in the R -3 /PD zone (R -3 /SO pending) located north of the Alpha Beta Shopping Center at Ba.,, Line and Archibald (Exhibit "A "). In addition, Parcel Map 7827 has been submitted which will appear on the March 9, 1983 Planning Commission agenda. The property is grade presently vacant and slopes to the south at approximately a 5 percent . A previous 152 unit condominium project, Tentative Tract 11615 (Lewis Properties), was approved for this site on February 10, 1982. The surrounding zoning and land uses are indicated on the attached Site Utilization Map (Exhibit "B "). The senior housing is proposed at 35.4 dwelling units per acre and the remaining apartments are planned at 18.2 dwelling units per acre. The existing General Plan land use designation is Medium High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre). A General Plan amendment to High Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per acre) i; pending. T4;— Senior Gverlay and General Plan amendment are for the 4.55 acre Heritage Park portion of the site only. ANALYSIS: The project h.as been reviewed by the Design Review, Growth (Exhibit C Management, and Grading Committees. As indicated on the attached Parcel Map ""), access to this property will be provided by construction of the Lomita Court cul -de -sac. The project itself has been designed with a private street system and driveways, as shown on the Detailed Site Plan, Exhibit "D". Archibald Avenue will be widened to facilitate a left -turn pocket to resolve traffic circulation concerns. Drainage will be carried to the southeast corner cf the project site and collected into an underground pipe structure that will drain onto Archibald Avenue. The water will then be carried south by curb and gutter to an existing storm drain inlet structure at the intersection of Base Line and Archibald, as shown on Exhibit "K ". 0 Planned Development 83- 01 /Calmark Planning Commission Agenda February 23, 1983 Page 2 ® Within Heritage Park a total of 129 oarkina cnaroe n t) hav (_.8 /ur, : ,,, o,e been provided, which is below the normal requirement of 2.2 spaces per unit. This reduction in parking is an incentive under the Overlay District provisions. Based upon survey information and field investigation, 3.8 spaces per unit is more than adequate to meet the parking needs of a senior citizen project. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE: The Committee has worked with the applicant to resolve concerns relative to the Site Plan configuration, recreational space, and elevations. The Site Plan has been redesigned to redistribute units in both projects to provide a more open feeling and larger recreation areas. The Design Review Committee felt that the elevations for the non - senior apartments (Sunrise) needed a stronger roof element, therefore, these elevations have been redesigned to provide a more continuous shed roof system as shown on the attached elevations, Exhibit "H". The Committee also felt that the exterior treatment of the end units within the senior apartment complex (Heritage Park) needed more relief to break up the flat wall plane. Therefore, stucco window plant -ons have been added to provide a shadow line (Exhibit "I "). It does not appear that this meets the intent of the Design Review Committee, therefore, staff is recommending a condition of approval requiring more detail and relief from the flat wall be provided at the window openings as shown on elevation B -B. ® ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and found that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because of mitigation measures designed into the project. Therefore, staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. FACTS FOR FINDING: The Parcel Map has been prepared in accordance with City standards and policies and the project site is suitable for the proposed subdivision. The project design is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. CORRESPONDENCE: A Notice of Public Hearing was placed ir. Re ort newspaper and approximately 27 public hearing notices to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. In public hearing notices were posted on the property. Prior to hearing, the applicant met with the senior citizens "VIP" discuss the project and received their input. The "VIP" grow this project. To date, no further correspondence has beep either for or against this project. The Daily were sent addition, the public group to P supports i received Planned Development Planning Commission February 23, 1983 Page 3 83 -01 /Calmark Agenda RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval, the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaratica would be appropriate. ly ^bmitted, anner DC:jr Attachments: Letter from Calmark Development Corporation Supplemental information packet Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Parcel Map Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Natural Features Map Exhibit "H" - Sunrise Elevations Exhibit "I" - Heritage Park Elevations Exhibit "J" - Heritage Park Recreation Building Exhibit "K" - Off -site Drainage Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions Ll 11 E r � Calmark Development Corpor� A A a G9 Je.v+ce February 11, 1983 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ATTN: Rick Marks Planner e,r ' 4T CEO —l. Y,`3 Re: Heritage Park -Rancho Cucamonga Response to Senior's Concerns Dear Rick: In response to the concerns expressed by the senior citizens who were kind enough to give their input to the design of housing for seniors, I would like to take this opportunity to detail how Calmark addresses each of their concerns in its Heritage Park apartment program. o Lighting - The lighting at Heritage Park is handled through a combination of walk lights mounted on poles for maximum dispersion and to minimize any potential for injury due to tripping. Mercury vapor lights are mounted on the interior ends of buildings to provide large amounts of light to the interior spaces. Porch lights are provided along the balconies and outside the front doors to illuminate the entrances of each apartment. Finally, street lights are placed in the parking areas to light the perimeter of the project as well as the parking areas. The combination of all of these methods is utilized to achieve the goal of no dark or unlit spaces for someone to trip or hide in. o Interface With Surrounding Projects - The design of the project focuses the attention as well as the activity of the seniors to the center of the development. In addition, great detail is given to the buffering through berms and landscaping to minimize any impact from surrounding neighborhood. Entrances are limited to restrict nuisance traffic through the development. In general, Heritage Park projects are designed and developed to promote the feeling of a community within the project while limiting the intrusion or impact of the surrounding neighborhood. 2121 Cfoverfield Blvd. Suite 202. P.O_ Box 2128, Santa Monica. California 90406 (213) 453 -1773 c Rick Marks Feburary 11, 1983 Page Two ri o Handrails – The handrails that are presently designed for the project are of a textured wood. Ve could ->rovide a curved rail to serve as a grab bar to satisfy the concern over having a smaller rail to hold on t .i. o Recreation Room – The Recreation Room presently being used in the Heritage Park Program is a single story structure which comprises approximately 2000 square feet exlusive of the manager's unit and office. This building will contain, in addition to the manager's apartment and office, a large open space for meetings, parties, or just gathering to talk. It will be equiped with accordian style doors to provide for the division of the space on a temporary basis. The building also includes restrooms, laundry, kitchen and storage face : *_ies. o Affordability – This is without a doubt the biggest concern of all of the parties involved. The basic plan for the Heritage Park Program is designed to provide the necessary comforts Of living without adding the additional expenses of luxuries because we have found that this segment of t:ie population just can't afford them. It becomes a choice between living spaces or food. We can all think of items to add that would make the project just a little better in some respects, but we also have to understand that these people are on a fixed limited income, so the overriding concern should be, how can we lower the rents just a little bit more? The City and Calmark working together are making an attempt to do just this by reducing unnecessary costs, waiving fees and exploring avenues of further assistance such as bond fiancing and land write downs to provide the development with the lowest possible basis on which to base the rent structure. We definately believe that through these efforts and input from interested groups of senior citizens, we can deliver new housing for the senior citizens of Rancho Cucamonga. Sincerely, CALM DE''ELOPMEhT CORPORATION 9t L— arty Persons Project Manager LP:th El 1,EPT. ® SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PACKET Calmark Development Corporation, os Santa Monica is currently requesting the Planning Commission and City Council approval of a. 26F unit apartment community located within. the 9500 block of Lomita Court in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. This project is •::omposed of two programs operating inde- pendently of eaLh other; Sunrise, a 108 unit general occupancy apartment complex, and Heritage Park, a 161 unit senior citizen apartment community. We feel that this site is unique in that it most completely satisfies the needs.of both senior citizens who desire decent affordable housing, and families and indi- viduals who seek comfort and luxury at a price they can afford. Calmark is very concerned with the overall well being of its tenants and is, therefor, a =tremely particular in select- ing a city and a location within that city for the placement of its Sunrise and Heritage Park programs. We have found, through analysis of the 1980 census data, that Rancho Cucamonga is an attractive community with a pop- ulation of 55250 people. Ten percent of the population (5499 people) are aged 55 and over, and 54% (29,979 people) are be- tween the ages of 18 and 54. Rancho Cucamonga is large enough to provide adequate service to its citizens, yet small enough to promote a warm, friendly environment; an environment which is extremely attractive to senior citizens seeking comfort, security, and community acceptance, and to young individuals just starting out, and young families who are locking for a place to raise their children_ In addition to the favorable environmental aspects, 13 %, or 7332 people in the city are renters, and the community vacancy rate is 48, thus, as home prices continue to remain out of reach of many young families we would not only expect to see the number of renters increase, but also an increased demand for luxury apartments. This is the market for which the Sunrise apartments are designed. As the demand for luxury apartments increases at a rate faster than the supply (new construction), which it will in the short run, many of the existing apartments will be taken by this younger, higher income earning population who, in ab- solute dollars, are able to spend more money for housing than a retired person, for instance, who is limited to a pension or other form of fixed income. It is for these pensioners that the Heritage Park program is designed. 0 The Heritage Park Program is the private market solution to providing decent, low -cost housing specifically for persons aged 55 and over. In periods where young individuals cannot afford to buy homes, but can afford to spend more money on rental housing, without such a program for senior citizens, many of them will be forced to sot" adequate housing. .tee .,-, unsatisfactory os in- The proposed project„ 'therefore, provides housing for both groups. The Sunrise apartments are designed for families and individuals who seek comfort and luxury, and the Heritage Park apartments provide decent affordable housing for senior citizens. Together both communities meet the demand for housing in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. THE SUNRISE APARTMENTS The population in Celifernia and especially southern_ California has been increasing continually during the past decade. Coupled with increasing construction costs and mortgage rates, home ownership in the eighties has become almost impossible for the new or relocating family. Spiraling mortgage rates and the drastic reduction of new home starts has created a dramatic shortage of available apartments. It is this segment, the new and relocating family, who cannot afford homeownership, that the Sunrise Apartment Program is geared to meet. In response to this demand in housing, Calmark Development has developed it's 'Sunrise Apartment Program". The key points of the program are as follows: • Location - Chosen with market exposure, ling term appreciation, and convenience in mind. • Condominium Conversion - The Sunrise Apartment Projects are processed and built as airspace condo- miniums to more easily facilitate the conversion and sale of the units as condominiums at a future date. o Market segmentation - Plan, design, develop, market, and manage apartments exclusively for specific market segments. o Superior Design - By eliminating hail areas, and maximizing efficiency in other areas, Calmark has Produced plans which economically meet the basic requirements of luxury living. o Neighborhood emphasis - Calmark Sunrise Apartments are a quality garden apartment within an urban. setting. The use of two story construction and lush landscape treatments creates a park -like residential neighbor- hood. I] Cl C o Open space - 15 sacrificing open ® Sunrise project u to 25 units to the acre without space. Landscaped open space at a is over 50 percent. o Proper scale - Large enough for economies of scale; small enough for personal management and sense of community. 100 - 250 units. o On -site amenities - Social and recreation center, pools, jacuzzi, laundry facilities, 508 r open space. In Rancho Cucamonga, the Sunrise Apartment Community is situated on 5.95 acres of lane: in the 9500 block of Lomita Court. The project consists of. 108 units; 30 one bedroom units and 78 two bedroom units. There are 18.2 units to the acre, yet the 9 buildings, 108 carports, and 130 open parking spaces (a total of 2.2 parking spaces per unit) are designed within a pleasantly landscaped garden -type setting providing for maximum open space. HERITAGE PARR RENTAL HOUSING PROGRAM FOR SENIOR CITIZENS Calmark's solution to the housing needs of the aged is a program called the Heritage Park Rental Housing Program for senior citizens. The program is a senior citizen garden apartment community designed for the comfort and affordability of these more sensitive residents. The project offers decoratively landscaped grounds reminiscent of the East and Midwest. There's a comfortable clubhouse which is the center of each Heritage Park and serves as the community's information center. It contains a lounge, a brightly decorated activity area, laundry facilities: the resident managers office, and mail boxes right in the lobby. It is a decidedly different affair than the recreation room of a typical 270's -style singles complex or a dreary government housing facility, circumstances Calmark found foreboding to most seniors. The apartments are noticeably different, too. They are designed for senior citizens. Cupboards and wall switches are several inches lower than average; wall plugs are several inches higher. Stairways have extra deep steps with landings halfway between floors. Most units accomodate wheelchairs (first floor units, wherever possible, have gradual sloped ramps, instead of stairs, all the way to street or parking areas). A11 - elects C C on the basis of j� kitchen appliances are selected in large part ® , heating and air how easy theyunitstarElea& Fully automatic with quality insulation to Pr ided in combination comfort to these more sensitive residents. e cost of physical Double- locking doors and smoke detect& alarms extra measure of security most seniors havaS come to relyion.an Decorator- designed interiors are carefully planned using lighter, brighter - yet, entirely contemporary - color schemes to provide an additional, subtly positive, environmentaY influence. Realizing that apartment life is far ?ore than brick, mortar, and wallpaper to a retired person sending most o£ his or her time on the grounds, Calmark Encoura es residents to personalize their apartments with approved s r colors, wallpaper, extra shelves, hanging plants, a s the like, to further increase their sense of 'home'. There is a unique lifestyle at every Heritage Park that understanding of for privacy and independence with an activity. Calmark'sp management for coo hni'4nship and shared facilities and coordinated activities with toforcingothem on anyone. Privacy is a matter of choice, andirhen it's company you want_... it's right there outside your door. The clubhouse and outdoor patios are the hub of social activity at any Heritage Park. There's alw�ys hot coffee and someone to chat with when residents pick up`mail or do their laundry. The comfordably furnished lounge .Pi an easy place to spend an afternoon reading or playing cards and games. There is a craft area for all sorts of activities; and the lobby doubles as a dance floor for parties. The clubhouse kitchen facilities are a big plus when residents hoed a lar groups. The outdoor patio areas and gas ba26equesrare£arscenee of numberous summer afternoon and evening parties. Residents at the Heritage Parks elect G eir own activity committees and hold potluck dinners, Bingo, swap meets and crafts classes, and often organize group excursion , arts s. Some flowersrand cardshinsClubs Still by ailing residents with pianos, tables, stereo equipment and additional gamesforactivity nights through the proceeds of fund raising events. Calmark sponsors a monthly newsletter air each Heritage Park which is written by residents and on -sife managers. These include greetings to new neighbors along with announcements of activities and meetings. Holiday festivities such as parties and barbeques are held throughout the year, Some sponsored by Calmark, and others by residents. C r Community involvement is important too. Managers coordinate with Private and local government agencies to help residents take advantage of law cost services for seniors. in many of the cities, existing Heritage Park residents have free transportation available for shopping and medical appointments, very low -cost hot lunch programs, "meal on wheels" for shut -ins, mobile library facilities and many more services designed to aid seriors. With so much involvement and specialization of facilities, it would seem inevitable that Calmark has an overhead problem at its Heritage Parks. Surprisingly, they don't. Heritage Park rents are generally lower'than existing, nearby housing* and substantially lower than typical new construction in the area. Lower rents are attributed to land use which incorporates 40 units to the acre and parking per unit than ordinary general occu Developments are designed with a mixture of percent one bedroom and twenty -fire percent apartments. and project design provides less pancy projects. The seventy -five two bedroom In a recent study of the program, it was found that this usage results in an average of 1.2 people per unit. This figure is substantially lower than a typical general occupancy ®apartment project built at 15 units per acre resulting in 3.24 persons per unit (Census Data 1980, mean persons per unit for Rancho Cucamonga). This fact, accompanied with smaller unit size, 515 sq. ft. average as compared to 800 -850 sq. ft. for typical general occupancy, results in the reduction of any impact from the project's density. In the same study, Calmark learned that only 51% of all its tenants (from seven existing projects) were car owners. Thus, the parking needs for seniors are not as demanding as for a typical general occupancy project. Calmark takes this into consideration in the project design which provides parking at .6 to .8 spaces per unit. It is believed, based on past experience , that this range is more than sufficient for satisfying the Parking needs of the elderly. In a study prepared by L.D. King Inc. for Calmark, it was found that this type of project will only increase traffic flow by 3 trips per unit per day. This figure is substantially lower than typical apartment projects and can be justified by the fact that Calmark tries to locate its projects adjacent to shopping, recreation and health care facilities so as to minimize the need for a car. C Currently, our( oject of 4.55 acres is d� gned for 161 units, 116 one bedr"as and 45 two bedrooms (7 �% one bedroom, and 27.5% two bedroom). This works out to 35.4 units per acre, slightly lower than our average of 40 du /acre. Parking will be provided at 8 spaces per unit or 129 =maces. A project of this size will generate an insignificant increase in traffic ID flow of only 483 trips per day on bath Archibald and Baseline. The project design, consisting of 9 buildings, including recreation building and managers unit, is similar to our existing project in Duarte, which provides a central corridor within the project allowing appoximately 50% open area. This area not only lends itself to the garden type atmosphere, but also provides a warm "homey" environment in which the elderly will be comfortable. The ideal location for a Heritage Park is across the street from a shopping center, bordered by two churches, three or four doors down from a park, and main bus lines crossing at the corner. In the City of Rancho Cucamonga we fec. ­e have f Ord a such site. It's located in the 9500 block __ Lomita Court, northwest of the intersection of Baseline and Archibald. At this site, both projectsr not just the Heritage Park, are located to provide maximum exposure to community services and personal needs required by both type of tenent. For both communities, the project is located adjacent to two major shopping centers, including grocery and banking facilities, near City Hall, and Alta Loma elementary school. It is within one mile of the Post Office, the fire station., Lion's Park and Lion's Community Center, Alta Loma High School, Cucamonga Junior High School, Central Elementary School, and Dona Merced Elementary School; within two miles of the sherriffIs station, LaMancha Golf Course, and Red Hill Country Club, Chaffee Community College, Cucamonga Elementary School, and Rancho Cucamonga Middle School; and within four miles of the Ontario International Airport, Vineyard Park, Cucamonga - Guasti Regional Park, and The San Antonio Community Hospital. Inteistate 15 is located 4.5 miles east and the San Bernardino freeway is located 3.75 miles south of the project. (See Exhibit "A ") Overall, the site we have chosen for our Sunrise and Heritage Park programs most completely satisfies the needs of all ages of the population demanding housing. It's hard to believe that such an ideal location could be obtained which would allow for decent housing .f senior citizens at an affordable price, as well as, provide comfort and luxury to those families who desire the setting of, but are unable to afford, homeownership. Very effectively planned and controlled construction, along with a unique project design„ and local government cooperation car. result in two remarkably successful garden apartment communities known as "SUNRISE* and "HERITAGE PARK ", located in the 9500 block of Lomita Court, which will most clearly meet the demand for rental housing in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. C 0 "EXHIBIT A" I arM mr lOMITA Cr 8 BASE LINE AVE C u VICINITY MAP m qC qC . o J < s V 2 A - SUNRISE & 3ERITAGE PARR LOCATION c B - NORTTWEST CORNER OF BASELINE & ARCHIBALD 1. Alta Loma Sewing Center 14. Mi Casita - Mexican 2. Farmer's Insurance Restaurant 3. Dick Nelson's Insurance 15. Alta Loaa Liquor 4. Pool Supplies 16. Nicasistros Italian 5. Video Plus Cuisine 6. Action Travel 17. Daminco Hair Dimensions 7. Tony's Cleaners 18. Speed Queen Laundry 8. Hole in the wall Deli 19. 011ie's Health Foods 9. Sunshine Fasc,ion Showroom 20. Dentist's Office 10. Beauty Sapply 21. Optometrists Office 11. Thrifty 22. Upland Savings 12. Alpha Beta 23. Security Pacific Bank 13. Sizzler C - SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASELINE fi 1. Pup 'r. Taco 2. Barro's Pizza 3. Village Doruts 4. Rainbow Gemo 5. Jupris Hair Design 6. D & M Cleaners ARCHIBALD 7. W31ker & Lee Real Estate 8. Galaxy Arcade 9. Video Station 10. Schwinn 11. Baskin Robbins Restaurant D. SOUTHEAST CORNER CF Bz,SELINE AND 1. Foothill Independeot Bank 2. Albertson's 3. Clothestime 4. Coffee Co. 5. Harvi's Cleaners 6. Angels 7. Command Performance E. BUS STOP 0 ARCHIBALD 8. Law Shoppe 9. Athlete's Foot 10. Narcy'a Hallma -k 11. Lorenzo's Deli 12. Antiquity Furniture i3. GTE Phone Mart OTHER INFORMATION Area Churches Church of Jesus Christ Zlf Lunar Day Saints Alta Lvma Community Church First Baptist Church United Methodist Church Area Schools Alta Loma High School Cucamonga Jr. High School Central Elementary Dona Merced Elementary School Cucamonga Elementary Alta Loma Elementary School Rancho Cucamonga Middle School Chaffee Community College Parks a Recreation Centers Lions Park S Community Center Cucamonga - Guasti Regional Park Vineyard Park - LaMancha Golf Course Redhill Country Club City Offices & Miscellaneous Distance From Project .8 miles .4 miles .3 miles .o' miles .9 miles .8 miles .8 miles 1.0 miles 1.6 miles (North) Adjacent 1.9 miles 2.6 miles .6 miles 2.9 miles 1.0 miles 2.1 miles 2.1 miles Post Office .9 s .7 miles City Hall .4 miles Sherriff's Station 1.9 miles Fire Statior .9 miles San Antonio Community Eospital 3.8 milea 15 Freeway 4.4 miles 10 Freeway 3.6 miles Ontario International Airport 4.0 miles 11 �•sun■nra WWI IUgI ■ aaaatnr is °MF ■■■' �■ ur.:■ra u �u °C =_ IiI1I11 !11 aaittt 111 UURU= • a■tra� � ♦ Y' %. 3 tr� � �G� •u•■4 tnu C .. � 1 nt . . ,. - .C:*'.. � �in. m_n r■tur■aa■ X11 � _• i. ; tnlnt%ItH1iNHttlnittan aunn� CHI ft1 Nmaaitun■■ uq� t _ p��. ��►� ..■ ' LLLL ■qt■r ■■ N .... a. �fIN NORTH CITY OF ■ � is � �� a �� � � �. � �� + �E to 10 1 PUNNING DlVM'N -, SCALE. ��♦ y LEGEND O = SINGGLE FAMILY IIAIISL) I i •ACW PLAY MXMo ; -- R -3 / R -3� racar; LA VINE 5T. — r -I:77D4C1 1 !f_R -Ti_— �..LF.EN7Aa.� L"'I i R -3 I f-- I ' \oN„ccaRrr; ..��.� + R -1 -S R a p L i R -3 LA GRANDE DR/ + S. P. R.R. CAN o C -p �' '"� / ra.srr R -3 /PD\ �Y S • LC•fTTA DRIYE LGDS7A —'C.m7� o taco} Oj O lvm.l�, ,, � E_ R -3MD i + w L a. frame I raWrt I i'�i c. t rya A - �R�3 / C -1 R -3 /PD H R, p R -3 R_3� -- ' - - - -- 5- O ra:ar: ..[..r racarr A -P r.nrz F- 3..ca„r ' / �/ 1Si�� RDeERJS atur 1 � mry.�� I.e: ( a c -1 L s BAS= LiN -c ROAD /( 1 NOR n CITY OF I RA \CHO C;C�NIO\GA MU-15 Lffuz.nm_wp® - PLANNING MOON EXHIBIT: _ SG1L.Er - -� __�/ �i `�i ➢IIA:Cf 1 I �11. r.-or ..r /i / /V+ %'ice i ^•i.�•-`` �� ;l _•ti. ��•ii Y J^.a,. �.. r��.a•= ��� I . cr �y o 46 I lain A `•...lam. y1` __ �-M� -� �_�A���� t ii � =! •� f�T y �Aj _ •3 / � a FF / i': C. • �. 1 �' l Jj �i-� —ter; \_i -" y��i f /__/ < J .� 1 LJI t Fj t5� NORTH CITY CAF ITEM: 4FD :Soap � ® RANCHO Cj..;CALN -IONGA TM-E: PLANNING DIVISION ExiilrAT =.L�SG'•_.E- i SUNRISE GENERAL OCCUPANCY APARTMENTS 1.1"u : •r. 3. yt�i�.o9} :c:LJ:rmP Tsxuc CCn:T• io. Ut:is Ott y)e0i'rICLLS ).r PClC . :a -: cL• /,rCte 1nLC�• Cc, : /CJ 7- Clp roof l: <P iPPCT.. LG .,e vA: : i/w ero�:nr] .b s.w•r- /� /��� � •..aorta., s••tc,.,•.A. ••KK .,IoM nrcK u,YCna om eou+aw. �" 0 N3 6I S WATER TMCCS 0 1--i "1 r �� rr Mks• �JJ""i !� rIA A r- �3 n ' b V v �` c A � _✓ n A � A 4 �, - fir'. . \° •�� � a. H' r i A • _ 15L ••. �rt Z I > n LUANZEKTAAa LOMITA COURT U Cwa..... u.ea.ca ....eu •cau C09nrxr� it s • : ee u u� .. - x..:• • - �• HERITAGE PARIC :•3 :� =- ELDERLY APARTMENTS :6l L�:'Z ':n wV.✓1.. n•.'f[Y <.'�5 /(eC? - .'..< •. w .! CITY �OF /�% /s/ kN T T 1 RA Y�Ca �� V ONGA PLANNING DIVNON M 5�\ NORTH 1 TITLE- asl_� E?CI ilGrr T SCALE: �- El S FyR OPIP PIX, { �ea� r—ax n �'JM�� � OIUI➢ 00/O CAl� x�awr. W' CITY OF ® RANCHO CUCtIC IONGA PLkNNINTG DI'%'L�IO,; V V NORTH ITEM: - PC) $3 001 TITLE= 4, _ EYHII iT= C SCALE- am° — um '•� � it -� y{ r _ �� �" r f ! P.m a _f�, iJ I d ' L _ r 10 17l E-2 r "iwixT i , A. �/- C �= �r i' url' S L=RIAV rfF L F'r�ls "Vf ✓ `� •c► � pb ;CCL a.e {•]. 324—_ J I" I c r WIS r o: JI 0 �I �t i TYP�CaI t^L- �yT,raY �� 9aCTeor•�:.: I Tr•TCn nmT,c L•CTT^, •. zcc:IZ{ •ec• tom. AV. � J IM cpnTal •ne• NORT•I.-I TYPICAL cA_TYC t"IT2 MOT CITY OF ITEA is *RANCHO -� CUc,,- 'IO�C� TITLEPL.AI� NIING DRr SIO.N E�CHIMIT: 0- Ir / —771 %f - -1 F S 'r ❑ A Av 5,1Z pit I �jF l�•' � � \. �._3 eJ ICS �� � /— �>:='":PL� -,ems 1� P.e.e. SfRe -73 yaa;t. / me i CITY OF ® RANCHO CU 1 kNM0 \yGA PLANNEI\C DIVISION' v r Y r r O i C t r ,NORTH rr ' E.N I: vi 1 TITLE: -w �•� %� EXHIBIT: — SCALE: "'� C a saxaw.tarar volawr�ru oa�uru 3 I T!TLE: W 4 EXHIBIT: _ to _ SC--X[-E:_ tR O ¢ W H x ICI 0 . .' A.Wo ,Poo NIP f � a J \y r y n 0. - R. c ; - —�_ vu II/ I J L! J 0 m 7'13A3® 5il�V6YZlP� oxlsnoar •,raar, LINT x ANN VIV1 S.11H Z O W ¢ O 4 O) r U 0 ..II pia Ll = sac 0 ITEM: rp g16� "® TITLEISLAMD E.\Iile^,iI- %n' SCALE= r"� O O O 8 o C O Y V C • t' e W S R O RE ITEM: rp g16� "® TITLEISLAMD E.\Iile^,iI- %n' SCALE= r"� L 1 12� CITY Or RANCHO CL'CA-,%10\GA PLANNING DIV S10N ITEM- EXHIBIT: IV; SCALE- -IL: NOR TH 0 L 1 12� CITY Or RANCHO CL'CA-,%10\GA PLANNING DIV S10N ITEM- EXHIBIT: IV; SCALE- -IL: NOR TH 0 d CITY OF i:ANC$O CUCAMONGA INITIAL ST•,7Dy PART I - EnOJECr 3:N'FORMTION SHE£: - To be completed b zmentai �sseusra —'- R6vaea Fee: 5fi7 X aPPlica_�t For all •00 pro- requiring environmental review, form must be completed and s•ub�tted to the D, Review COMMittee throu h , this project application g the department where theo�rt applicatinEnvirmnmde. Upon receipt of this Part II of the Initial Study. Analysis staff will Committee will meet and Y. T-ne Develo Prepare (10) dr s take action no later tent Review projectyisbefore the public meeting at whit than ten to be heard. The Coax- „itta will make time the three determinations. 1) The Project will make one of ficart environmental impact and a )e will be filed, 2) ease no signi The project will have a Declaration environmental impact and an Enviranmen'.al :mpac� Re wi11 be prepared, or 3 act Report Should be supplied An additional info tion concerning1thebY the applicant rmation rep,?rt proposed giving further inforwa- P project. P10JECT TITLE: Heri Dark - Rancho Cucamonga, Sunrise-Rancho APPLZCAho +$ 3N}L,- ADDRESS, TELEP$ONE P.p NAME, ADDRESS, CONCERNING TELEP$ONE OF PERSIN TO T3I5 P Monica ROJECT: Larry Persons, a CallfOrni3 90406, (` -D -_ 13 , Assist, Inc., 3151 Airwa µo �� 714/556 -9890 Y Avenue, i:'Ig. A_” LOCATION OF PaWECT (STREET ADDRESS M Dacznt Land n,__ :. Calmark Development Corp. BE CONTACTED P.O. Box -28, Saata LIST OTyiER PERMITS NECESSaRB FROM LOCAL, FED;+ AGENCIES AND THE xn e-n AGENCY ISSUING W I -y ca ?iSSESSOR PARCEL No., REGIONAL, STATE AND SUCH PERM-TS: 0 PROJECT DESCP.ZPTZON 0 E ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND - SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY': 9.78 acres — 616,010.8 SF No existing buildings DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROTECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF At3y EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) The project site is presently vacant undeveloped land supported by a •hicY cover of annum :ris and weeds, The surface slope are no nistorical or scenic aspects evident_ on the property. Is the projec.; part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, m:y as a whol_ have significant environmental impact? 1 -2 0 WILL THIS PROJECT: 11 - YES NO _ x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? Q 3. Create a substantial change in desaad' for _ municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing -Tees? Sow many? ?9 X 6.z--Create the reed for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above trees which cannot be incorporated into the removed. These trees will be replaced by a a mix of the following trees: Platanus Ater Brachychiton Ponulneus. Cupanionsis Anacardi E. nucaipptus litri000ra,'Trlstania conterta, Licuidambar Stv;acifolia, Lagerstroemi.a Indica. TMPORTAXT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above :u,,' in the attached exhibits present the data and information requirk3 for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, utatements, and information presented are true and correct t-a the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the De plopmenjr- evieu; Committee. Date 12/15!82 Signature .t Title Project 1 -3 MSIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ' The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Calmark Development Corp., Parcel Map #5792 Parcel #2 of Parcel *Sap f;5792 in the City of Rancho Specific Location of Project: Cucamonga, County of San Bernariino, State of California z - PHASE I PHASE 2 VZASE--3--. POAS" TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 0 0 0 0 0 2. Number of multiple family units: 161 60 48 269 3. Date proposed to begin construction: _ Earliest date of occupancy: Model # and f of Tentat3 ie 5. Bedrooms Price TdI e A -1 390 0 16 14 30 B -2 460 0 28 20 48 C -2 530 0 16 14 30 *A -1 320 120 0 0 120 *B-2 410 41 0 0 41 fo * Senior Citizen Project. Y -4 S 0 RESOLUTION ie "v. * A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 83 -01 FOR 9.78 ACRES, AND REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -J /PD TO R -3 /SO FOR 4.55 ACRE PORTION OF THE SITE, PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 7827, LOCATED 'HEST OF ARCHIBALD AND NORTH OF BASE LINE WHEREAS, on the 25th day of January, 1983, an application was filed and accepted on the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of February, 193 , the ?fanning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Cc-mission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. ® 2. That the proposed Zone Change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. That the proposed Zone Change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that 1 this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on F;tiruary 23, 1983. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commissions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 23rd day of February, 1983, Planned Development No. 83 -01. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 83 -01 and the zone change request. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolu*_icn and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. �y Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 3: Planned Development No. 83 -01 is hereby approved sub's to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: �-ct PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Approval of Planned Development 83 -01 ;s granted subject to approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 83 -02, General Plan Amendment 83 -03, and Parcel Map 7827. 2. All conditions of approval applicable to Parcel Map 7827 shall apply to this Planned Development. 3- Approval of Planned Development 83 -01 is granted subject to approval of a Development Agreement granting a density bonus to allow the Heritage Park project density to proceed at 35.4 du /ac. 4. All upper -story window treatments on the end unit elevations within Heritage Park shall be designed consistent with the design indicated on the end of elevation 8 -B to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5. Benches shall be provided throughout Heritage ?ark along the sidewalks. 6. Pedestrian access to the shopping must be provided along the J south property line; details of which shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of Building Permits. 7. Dense landscaping shall be provided along the deciduous trees, luton including lu rbuffer r the nproject n and from surrounding land uses. 8. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted indicating adequate lighting along Heritage Park walkways. 9. Heritage Park landscaping shall consider minimizing impact from surrounding neighborhood. 10. Handrails that can be used as "grab -bars" shall be provided on all stairways within-' -itage Park. El L 'I Resolution No. Page 3 E ENGINEERING DIV.ZION 11. All pertinent conditions of Parcel Map 5792 shall apply to this project. 12. The east side of Archibald Avenue shall be widened as required by the City Engineer to provide for a left -turn pocket to Lomita Court. 13. Construction of either an AC Swale or curb and gutter and connecting paving on west side of Archibald Avenue shall be required to protect the shoulder from drainage erosior. from Lomita Court to the existing curb and gutter. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1983. PLANNING COMMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly intrcduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a reguiar meeting of the Planning Commission field on the 23rd day of February, 1983, by the following vote —to —wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 �fi i Vv_ °� uNP CT A N. TP. � —rtCiCC — V Y aN =" V — C +- — �°p0 ° O •o N• - - °W i cc -•-c er n� o.n fw �nFV YG'O .r D'D 09 CNY �A .. ✓ V —C -' G - c - � ao•� o - .oW qo .� D D O i•y ° T o N C � O O L A L y ° q• C O. O q � T 0 � U� L O. V � y u — N °O u " NCB T�9 -TiaV .^ ADj Cvu 90� WV iN u w. A f' A •r+ \w T� U 0„ A V >� J C C e' C C U• +O V D.. J^ L^ a _ d L OHW _ CJ W9 :E N L••• t T = ° a ° O ...•� °0 C V7 C ¢VT 9V�C9• N9n CL _> r — -6 Ac. « °` res•r ccs� = °d° L� b�L v°v 1`' =c•L. v�'O o•�L • o c�^ ��o` -ate "o "� " -= d•• °�> u V C E C O L A O +• � „ G U ° r >,W G O C. _P C T 61 � O D 9 N G W V O — y T N N - C A 0 ^• oG C V d— V C C O — 0 rV6 C G C U V T Y9 pLL9 �AyyL ��9 7Cy G�� aL°L •00 AO Tr V VVC9 n— •Z+J .Ln c9N AD � VVq r-d .1VS OL br �I•� 96r -6 ^U �d K OL ° LJ L� MO G V V•o •+L J r• V O 0' — 6r. O.a 64rs° 6a r °N — „6 rt N9 6VD 6A6LV Vt` °r« iOC OY X00. O� V9E n� 1 �I 3 � ytJ[ NN —W qV �d 060 V�� LVS „ CO N YP V•r � � O t •^L � W- L_ cW EL na s I` I d Li i c 'O rnE j S .I . W ¢• c .. „E 9 c -a °c qN? rn yjc,d T° „EN �I E C O O L 9 2 N \lI I <I C T _ O•.• A _ N P 9 N C� u J .• � N 4' Q N9 d^ 64r ^° NO «c Q � I � v •.^. �.^e y E ycv.� -� �r-T- -�s�'r i�Vr .+I N` 6 N O •.+ � � ``� �l� 1' � —� t C — i j< Cc b C y� 0 � O $ {C� I� � C d M A fO O..0 J T M O r 0, —0 Q m 1 1 N 1 GC 7 .0 V E •I ^I J i O JO Q� � --j1- O O L V rl I � Vl N 6 G f\ i jot N "p:5A ' G, ^OC P_O OL ✓P _ O N r N Y q C> A n P J nr L co�aJ� G d � N Ol• � L P .-o° ° yL;� �✓. Lo M y ✓ o QI ��� L - fo c'L' ✓ � ° Nu^`', me N« °v. �-•c � q • = J c _' q G_ �`• ^ E O� r�> ' pm °:. t; ✓`YEN ✓ G� u�. •° L °o ✓ NqL 4S r^Q ma _ _ ° s�o`u mi. 9 y. 6o E i _ G� O P� D f'' L `a" G ✓> A �� ry° C G _^ O N . L N V � a O V p r > Y V O• � P O C i � i O 7 o. _ A L C L N C�^ C V OOOA G 9VL C! GS O N✓ V � L p L qZ rn9 N _ qG ' ✓ P` U V G q c L r y q 1 P ✓• ✓ V n• ^ N "' rn o �n � L g L c E L a A O V ^G V NJZC LE•^ `£C U�� - F� O n06N V_grd r oa,a v:cq Jr _ q Nc L __ N oq `vr ^nDi C >..nu r�L. q A k.E 6 A6 d � cArn r C✓p Sr>�� N ✓�" O a D ✓ J^ N A. 9 C C � Z 9 ✓ r a C ✓ D L d` �° O C E S ✓ �'J r ✓ N �^ V g d .J N b q V L N L S n+ n O � C✓ O y C O T _ r � J S C 6✓ q V '� A e ✓Nj_S PL...� _ LO �. 9� V �� V C�A N OE ' OCON SL a`. r.d _GL 4q NSA a N� V L l V 4 Orr ✓ i6AV O� D �Z u•' _ 1 ^ A q 6 Nq PAL^ n C O � n n g N �N � � � a�C ^C N q N= r r A V ^ F 6 y= N P i£ a� O � c' A ✓� _ C q n V S r N N L Cam. D d ^_ q V N` a N_] O_ 6 r � V 9 O• N CP= V_ VVC� N ` V I L O V G ✓_ gP9L ✓D VP .-q C GJ✓ O C OO qd • >LV i9` V� ^q L.L✓ N S q A T r. nn.r. o.^r 'r —arc >wre tT O r ✓ O ..n 4 0 � � P N q V 9 v � N �oo �a•.o.^ �°'° uc c _ gOgy ^ _^ V L A �✓ V tiG�r�V✓ �I «r CyL L CZ Oqy` ✓ ^l J Ln� jJ0✓ ✓ aar✓ °G >a 4m ` N �,c°^cq o� o.c^ is n q P ° i " � � oe= � ti �,r °s o C^ �d ^� 062 +Vi � ✓r°- _ yd ^e' qC� ti-LNCq C 6NSrrr Wd ` iSO � rOi� ✓ S O> L C vI 6 S N 6^ 6 4 9 ._J V� Y r L S' - d� 0 E E V V LUOU rJTG a _ _ 9JLL.A� 'iAN9CC REV P ✓ PV✓ Or d C V�L yf.J ✓Vq�p�n V G Y C A O M L 6 r_ L O i 9 q y ....Oq� ✓ LC!J= r 9 r. VC _ A yAV -aGT EE r•I dU did `•n0 A D ✓ SiD PaL 9 cN��pyc�N nn 6 r _ND i N Ur TOa ^r 00 dCyi O•r' t] D 9 V .3 2 J A N L P n` ✓ S� � q L ,r � d N✓ V S�C,C � J_ q^ C CdL i °v. dLL OCU.' V1_4A q n �E CL N t�� TV raw q�Or)_r.0 y q�V A9 A „E Aq c- LNd S.-.+ T �J idnT G N� q N! Vr FY NP-. N•I r 3a cob � o` q:o° =c o� v'Eyv.° ^N)o� ,� oc_ ... x dJ c_° ° ° °w °crr c�Et ✓' `o c c c_ cc _ ._ -c.. = 9n'r -t"r"t c Aoo� o•n cL '` ✓co =_ q ?+o mrno a�TJ _rP ..LO CJOQ °'VL N`VO Pr _ L ✓_ y O pa q�r,aG L O E` d �_.� V C U` _ _ rr _ N C` •n � C V ✓ N i o L C 4 G_ d r `� q q 0 � �. C ° �✓ C N a � ..J L✓ �' L. N � V � C N F N L r° q N G 9p - 6 O V N g P N> v' a -OC \ CC Ni• CO VGU_ .0 -f (ryC l_ G � n AOa ✓•n 0^ U9S4 r r VC � ^^ ILO Nm�r �i C•✓i. Y9 .O a .S � V� Cw. uda G °� c =`. a✓ 't��v. o Nu° O r �c ✓Q. rr c rnac qy� E.DLA n__.°r�d0 ✓N J T V� � _V Prr A"C �M��� > Tin! C' Jn C.P ✓'^ L � q r Y• '_ ” l_ 6 r L P O i O. 6 G '- 2 N L � �<< G � N 6 C 4 6 6 6 4 N } C� P m ` 1 jot N .i AV I ��C.O. �O u ✓ •I ,J ot� r Vya � i r m_ U � I yuv � � O I d n G C p V ' i •O-• d � ✓_ °m ✓ a -- L t � N Fc co � -v- ' ` o N � Cp. u r. y L ry � TT _O' `L UN ✓N JGO 1 E '. V O. a. =' d� J •.• u V O 6�] O °V.. d 0 V C - C 6 �� > q I 9_ C✓ O. O rN q A d p t r - rlr d V g C V J .". �✓ 9 u L G E- L 6 r a G O N n✓ Li• O u Q � p d O C i L Y. N� u UV O ` I a ' O rn A r Y• C a y V V -. ✓ n C y O. C u u F C 1 1 4 I r O ✓ L� O C yO. t r V r ✓ - •'J C y O V✓ G> TL C u N- _d L C ✓ O i .. C _ rP o d F�N u^ 6d S•'d � to E- 1 VG 4N � O „ Y u „SO O N` C TL yO••J 9 ✓ .c �G P.` ✓ `V a � q D J O O A C I ✓ I ✓ .N. d L C 06 ry NO- ✓ p G� �>.dn0 CND C OI V ~ Wi Vw.LL N ✓J Ar uC� _ O` C CO N VN- n N O F V1� b AO C CCC C A C O •' U L ¢I ✓ 0 LL O. L -N AV C � u � V 2 T V V PVf 0 F O u YrJ C 0 V� u07 mar— ° .r O✓ .0 4 q0 w^ `04 r- LC 14 F( G- GJIL ObUP ✓ 6m VO `Pp r OI O » CL� 06 AO 6a6 NO��F -c� o U' •T Oo rnY Pr- _ E oo nn 1 J•o� C•I lC V.r n0 � �O LCOL d I C_6N � U C A LL W l >Cr0 �4 C' I 6 V r V A r C n✓ n � A- .Gp t• n G O V ^` �' I d T r a C > L L V 6 6JWl A ✓ N .-�• O L G� .f n. V = n V i '� ? C✓ v 1' Yy p N Y uy 9^ V d 9 O q d V G O - 4 C O_NNV n y V y N u C J1 C .uir L`O .--iY C CV qA LM9 =0 rdT —� ✓`o oac G.— A vi o c i A nN c dr o Frn Any y G C. u s r C✓ d C- 9� L s - O N d Q = U C q �. ^ i" 9 y P n O a >.• N C •� O F • PL -L ✓_ - -?JL _� G r� L FCr G VP ELF PPrdn L yN Fr Lam` r0 C NvP L N ✓ -✓ pA a L ,r, i -- � ° t r� J u N ✓ N �• L O C O C � .^ N u � d A E r Q .- •' F u C q L l 7- Cd J -- C dr 1✓ N d OVOC � O L .. �� v7 - -.E �� .G nS� NVP r✓e �� 6N c`r nc !•T G -^ rG0 LC.' =d n tL C. dOC A 9r ���� _ JC T. O ✓A �• p _ u N V d �� L J N 6 L a V O ✓ L C C v V' .Ln l n_ V T_' T T J u_ y J a O V •J C A C C✓ V A d P n d _c ✓ >. C = G d.. rN ✓. n L j A� 9 N —> Oa� �`v .! N vE E.J_ ✓4 -�O` C r0 P�NGI � �� VF OV CA ^y V`V P 1 u ✓V .. ✓NF�.�� �u +�a ✓..Q V y_d dPU C Cp O Gar N i V GQ n � LL T C V k` V n •Or. Nrpi y _y ., 9 L � r � T O C ✓ A A a d C ✓ - LL C d L _� 6�� -OO� C.• _Y V CNV C F9F A S d• c .ONNO^ �' a Aug GH V�A✓ CNr 2V CN u r- - L�.L ✓ V✓aF e e. -r .�Vnc C - CC 6NA 6r VC JL�� N�NAN 6N <a Gf.r {NdV 6F ^06 Q Y I_y✓ L ^NV N S N.O.r yi ID O p O 6 C E GA Pa c• nLV ✓dam Lo�mvr= bw. d vc-c � oN � L�>.= � q� C � v A L n d ��✓ u N J N O 9 u P m �= u a _ ` aarmm rCro ..E O P y E✓ � 2 V q � Q. L A O G ^ d C•r v> c_ u �' ^ C'. O C � a T O P� � VVr Ord �rC Ufrl9a A LVi C+ i _ = Cy^ c c G C�9 N ^� �GrOJI LpG T c.. CG _b YO. OM N w V fir. > NuA c v✓^ T _ d u u V V V L V .� � O Lbr.'J G N C p v C W✓ V L E L L > C A u✓ W - ` d ..O Fyn y A a V C v O N vO10 qp no AaWO Loci x '^ fL i' _ �` C q_ G 9q V GA r ^Vr qq ✓9L_ d t; a NCB L u G L u d a u A V p `' 9 4 C ^ Y T'O T r•� N � l N •L. L O ^ G .r ..r � u ^ rr �T W' 9 i� P C du~ur0 P GGO V uuY N dANOr2 00 d0 N. O�OdT AG yL0 NN�t nr—rr ql: uVyL G ALwuiT 9C0 ✓ �P �✓ C Or > ny u 0 �. = Y AN a O A Q ' n 'E de 7y d' d4y Lam✓ nrr) OJ y qC avcW Oou v rov L` ` e c LVy` O< E� q0 C ao dL PANTb L O Lp � p�0^ dNE OLNdb.< ~6 �. c' . V it .+ ➢CC V '; o >N >o >= N mLCE a O T t ao ^-d•u _ ... .y v�u` G V• C a4 O n"nOp Gri ny qy O^ LV �� E6L Or r A ^uu rrOr CU ^ OCC�4 =C y� 7Ll V aL u A n n O 9 C � A V^ d L G• N q v d L L W G Cr N .guy GN' NruC prLU N� VI LV 'E` r= �i n�CU ^O✓ due - P CrO N _° rr>r rOgN A.�.+ad2 GCi 9dq QVI ^G YN PL 6G q L rr L_ C W rLC p P yY� 4^ yu 9 •TO 1 A n N II N ^v 9 yS� OAUT VaN LVb n.w '� OmN C NCL qCr V r0 '^q S j0 �✓bL CUUbr OIL^ C1C22 T = NC d0 La PV q E+ ru�T G OVL= r 9 NA P_u � rV ni P� l N V `G<d F ✓ 6dT_rY N�'pe >> •'NTAC n9V_ G��NF}{ NN 6C`�✓ L d ✓ O r-j-r =L rC� uyy ✓V✓ T T_ O A= M✓1 VCV O Aa { q NV9N C9AO Gn -� L Worn t O O P C _✓ _ ZLU ✓L N� G �VU� C >6LUVr L'�gWG N 6VL WNV WVU 7n U'76T �� ^ rQ .� AI C ^ C ✓ N qI 14I N� I � �1y GI� iai L W� J C E � L�>.= o _^ �� >c urn rr ^✓ °vv a= yiE �G VVr Ord �rC Ufrl9a A pN _ = Cy^ c c G L T c.. CG c_,,'^ -rpm v c'c+ -- o fir. > c v✓^ O V a f y �• d u u � q� a^ _LS l U q v C q L V L E G L L > C A u✓ C a Fyn y A a V C v O N vO10 qp no AaWO Loci x '^ fL i' _ �` dp G d L u A > A u d d u^ b �o q Y y N G ^ y `c. O� a ✓ �✓ C Or r r A C F V�� L 0 �. = Y O A Q ' n Q l- avcW -r O< E� q0 C ao y.i PANTb '' Lq � O pT POr �. c' . V C• ^ _ .^ V. a G a O T t _ G V• C u 9 r A ^uu rrOr CU ^ OCC�4 =C y� 7Ll V q �-J� r ¢'e �N urOr �UWC r - P 9Y _ _ W _ a^ JG C Y^r ^ O C. V T N r 9 P a= V OAUT VaN LVb '� OmN C NCL qCr �uG r0 '^q S dl VO. PLN O PJ OV>r VO `VN_ q E+ r n`O1� LOOj l C ^ . O l N V nr �. 91G P'^ .r• � Ou O �C rC� N6V t q �VL q w L � C � A -.r V_ _✓ _ ZLU ✓L N� G �VU� C >6LUVr L'�gWG N 6VL WNV WVU 7n U'76T �� ^ rQ .� AI ^ C ✓ N I C E L f TT7 V Q S M Y O v C_ I I C l A O 'c •°+ d E h Cr = O'9 C' N w •n q L t C •O- G ^J p VP.,v Cam• �' • U Y C� N 9 A 4 S N U GNO d- p� y PO ✓ dW JQ'✓ 60 I I I� D ✓T tG ✓C 4']" � N= ••°i O J `9 I ✓�^ � 4 1-w r Y � 9` ' C U L 9 d C Y G V C y r I 1 C V C p � -� �� J N N N• _ ✓ � ✓ A _ X p✓ ^ L C c J N l O✓ ^u \I I I � C CrC 'J✓J VGL^FV' C ✓ Oj0'OrN f CN oc j I j i °mac � i dd c:. or t r a�' •t.. .t.'o � s C q.0 _ pr Yi. qO � adC GC VV i Cy O ✓6d^ • - _ 4 E O 6 t L ^ q L d V W'6 EY L =TN VL A 9r- 6 L ApC pD +•O.- 9_ UC ✓C N Vq ^«O` N� «O 6r- III -V,yP UIdV VriV ^S L YV P V�QC TL w {=J C=J yy,� 1 I y EAU i4c•.NO V ✓G -•�+ iM -�L PINY ^9 T G X N� u N o A Y c r I I I .g. a I ';Md co a �.a a •'a ✓c �i c P I i V = cCrSir udN N Y` O O�,-E OO u {� ` I •. 9 J O 6 D 4 9 C J C Y L G V y q N O S r L 6 d L J 66 Or N Wrr Q a Dq C A= pO' c I d .Nr. 14 —_N •. cN°t �c wE a a ° y � «'V T I 'V"v'l. D NC r° ✓Y � •MO L 7 0 - - I I p✓ CO ^O `Y pl�V. 9G Or D I I - . � N.'°.Li CEO 4•= `-" V� K D ` ° wi 1 T � (' V�N� -✓C C9 V° -Q P` N J • i i i u V I S �. �� Y° � V. P N O J ^ V O T I .� O i _ N � yE P• L.1': UC I I � L` I J 4 CN °r•J' �l `i MCN -q OZ r✓n ' p 4 I� V V L Q O I K •O+ O V C V✓ L A G S L W )L � � U A A S Z 6 L V^ t I i 1 G d 2S 2 N ie tt O II r f; O b2 "5 � C" tl r N q n r V• - ° I .� -` v 4u c� ELN L •' I r c mS O ^ ci--.c ^z rN � T l d t O U r • � u 9 1 �� d �^ •` l� n O V 6r 9 � I d d L ^ OI y rO � M� = =A � 1 rL ...G U ✓y a7 S w p Z5 !9 0 2.2 C nI �•J r <4N N i INr rr � Q� 1Y Q OD OO C'I N T N I•f �� N �p O 11 u U = O N ` O `uLrrV U _ O O V S S Y 0 0 I I C � O N F F L � y y r N p L y. 4 4 T O O .✓ N p ¢E N Gn N N V • N G •J 9 vi • _ ^I � v _ N N N N a t f f N ^ v •p_n ` ^ Cyr C C v I _ _ L q q M O 7 7 D c 9 M O L C L L N 9 � � 6 6 S L L A Liu a GOC C C � � V Vu O V G O C C D G> O p�N Q Q ^N C C W W�� < <n 4 4rVD o� N b b ^ ^I N N d 2S 2 N ie tt O II r f; O b2 "5 � C" tl r N q n r V• - ° I .� -` v 4u c� ELN L •' I r c mS O ^ ci--.c ^z rN � T l d t O U r • � u 9 1 �� d �^ •` l� n O V 6r 9 � I d d L ^ OI y rO � M� = =A � 1 rL ...G U ✓y a7 S w p Z5 !9 0 2.2 C nI �•J r <4N N i INr rr � Q� 1Y Q OD OO C'I N T N I•f �� N �p O 11 u 11 u G. f \J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 23, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENER,1L PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -03 - CALMARK - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) to High Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per acre) for the development of 161 affordable senior citizen apartments on approximately 4.55 acres of lard, located west of Archibald, and north of Base Line - APN 202 - 151 -34 RELATED FILE - PD 83 -01 - CALMARK PROJECT ANC SITE DESCRIPTION: Calmark Development Coiaaration is requesting a General Plan Pmendment to High Residential for the development of "Heritage Park ", a senior citizen affordable project of 161 apartment units on 4.55 acres of land. Heritage Park wiil be part of a larger Planned Development nn 9.78 acres of land that will include 108 general occupancy apartments as shown on the Detailed Site Plan, Exhibit "C ". The proposed project density for Heritage Park is 35.4 du /acre. Therefore, Calmark will be required as a Condition of Approval for Planned Development 83 -01 to enter into a Developer Agreement for a 25% density bonus (above 30 du /ac) purs;,ant to State law regarding incentives for affordable housino. The project site is presently vacant undeveloped lard. There is a previously approved 152 unit condominium project, Tentative Tract 11615, for this site. The property is located on the north side of the Alpha Beta shopping center at Base ;.ine and Archibald. The surrounding zoning and land use are shown on the attached Site Utilization Map, Exhibit "A ". The property is cu-rently zoned R -3 1PD and designated Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /arce) on the General Plan (Exhibit GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -03 Planning Commission Agenda February 23, 1983 Page 2 ANALYSIS: The public objective of providing affordable housing must be weighed against the compatibility of increased density. The City's General Plan and State law recognize that affordable housing is a desirable public objective. The availability and affordability of housing is a primary goal of the City's General Plan. Further, the General Plan recognizes that a "major constraint to affordable housing is not only higher construction costs but also the density and types of housing units being built in the city ". The General Plan contains numerous policies encouraging hcusing opportunities which are within the financial capabilities of low and moderate income persons and which meet the needs of the elderly, handicapped and minority groups. Heritage Park has been designed to specifically meet the needs of senior citizens with low and moderate income. The project site fulfills the location requirements of the senior housing overlay district: compatibility with surrounding commercial /office land uses, fairly level topography (5K grade), close proximity to services and public transit, and the general area is free from serious health, safety or noise problems. There are approximately a dozen single family homes to the west in an older neighborhood zoned R -3. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Part one of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. Staff has completed part two of the Initial Study and found that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment. If the Commission concurs with such findings, issuance of a Negative Dec'3ration would be in order. FACTS FOR FINDING: The project site is appropriate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development. Also, the change in land use designation from Medium -High to High is consistent with General Plan policies and State law. CORRESPONDENCE: A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Daily Report_ newspaper and 27 public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. In addition, public hearing notices have been posted on the property. The applicant and staff have met with the local senior citizens "VIP" group to obtain their input in the project design. The VIP group supports the Heritage Park development. E GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -03 Planning Commission Agenda February 23, 1983 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and material relative to this amendment. A Resolution of apprPpval is provided for review and consideration. Res6ectfml lvnsub„i tted ty flanner qG /DC /kep Attachments: Letter from Calmark Development Corporation Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization :Nap Exhibit "B" - General Plan Landuse Exhibit "C" - Site Plan ® Initial Study Part I Resolution of Approval 0 y V O• C! T `! C�i E:..v ; CUBA' +9L 0?.� =NT DE 1CC7 IJLiJ 7lgic1L L L 3 I I111211a15�6 January 24, 1983 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Calmark Senior Housing Project GPA Attn: Dan Coleman Dear Dan: Calmark Development Corporation hereby requests a GPA on its proposed project at Lomita Court. Our request is for a GPA change to High Density 24 -30 units per acre with a bonus density that allows the project to proceed at 35.4 du /ac. This request is justified based on the nature of the product targeted for elderly residents at an affordable rental range. We believe this project provides a program that meets the City's affordable housing strategy found on pages 14, 15, 78, ?3 and 89 of the General Plan. Very truly yours, fiar3y "i_ Strozier �4k� Principal HPIS : rc "LAS �S URBAN ASSIST, LVC 3101 Amway Avenue, Bldg. A-2, Costa Mesa, California 92626, (714) t•, r M r• . .4`..',.�•G4!r� rater y, :' .«_ ... . .. . - - - _ l . 'r, E 0 LEGEND = Q = SINGLE FAMILY tMaG•L7 x YALAIR � CnWR CITCi ' -- PLAY c � R -3� G=.= -3 R /' 'AND I =fLL LA VINE ST. r- - - ,- 1 I OII I M- —T"_J R30 LA GRANDE OR/ C -2 DR:.E y 1 �I v ROMU -S CURT O I 0i °I Oct —_ Mrr�C-2T� I C -1 -a R -3 O I v.rux i� C -1 ..TA.T 1 uc.As R -1 -5 \ ca.ecL' cRn.a \ R -1 -5 I S. P.R_R. xa. ` 'R -3 /PD1 I R -3 /PD ..n 7 l A —P C -1 _ +.rixN • r� uw wa LA-P/ i LLEMENTART' SCNC:L 1 ra12i.G I" ::RwE 1 I �J l / 1 1 R -3 / — - -- _ ss.cs.ca- w H c t {....a'.xx •'/ ��M j'/ S LCMITA y 1 �I v ROMU -S CURT O I 0i °I Oct —_ Mrr�C-2T� I C -1 -a R -3 O I v.rux i� C -1 ..TA.T 1 uc.As R -1 -5 \ ca.ecL' cRn.a \ R -1 -5 I S. P.R_R. xa. ` 'R -3 /PD1 I R -3 /PD ..n 7 l A —P C -1 _ +.rixN • r� uw wa LA-P/ GIFT' OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGAL PLANNING DIVOONT Y r NORTH fiEN1: C.--..xrT{ Etiit01 — _SCALE: �••• P!AT: I a_ GIFT' OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGAL PLANNING DIVOONT Y r NORTH fiEN1: C.--..xrT{ Etiit01 — _SCALE: �••• _LC)Wm MEDIUM 4 -8 DUIs /AC MEDIUM 4 -14 DU's /AC MEDIUM -HIGH e4 -24 DU's /AC C� NEIGHBORHOOD COMM. COMMERCIAL. OFFICE 'a ='w�Y - -..... :::. .. S s L� V FORTH CITY OF ITEM- �� v _rte °`� RA\CHO C:CNXION A TITLE- 9 me PLANNING DIVISION E\i iII3T= Sc kLE- SUNRISE GENERAL OCCUPANCY APARTMENTS ryC3i.3 x AIM 1. :IPS•.OIr w1:DIC2 111CIL �i 1 X.B [n= � 1.11 K — .a.: L•V/ - Pwe 21 ae aeo--r.. - 31w ]3 Drew l.:.w ox rsw :'113 + l.:neo ]lx YK x.x /w K:ti[tC] nS. rrT'L]L] Pllbt ]t ar C.IeC� 3/w 10 CPM l.x /.V 1W VIL ..: /:V rCN:XL] XVU rACI:C[O xl3 2V.Y. - x.l'w KW:fi] wX0 rW/'DN • —.e .ILL itw .1I•. IPIK•l NMM TIICI[ 411101] O .... WATER Teas 0 t" s Im 110 w• I L 1 G 1.- G D � 3 D D A • A � D • yS L{ L L b b w w .Ia u L p L D L/d L LEI L +J .m.. q ..3..Y Y ,t b 7 \ 7 1 L{lYlEAYAIiD i LOMITA COURT s+ IM' • ` A A 'A s 1•. :yL:1• "1� 1 � • • !� A > 1.1• •p '� • 1 �• • I A l w • w D R:, w�A • w D 3.m 13{ • 3 {t 1 Y { {0 3I 1x.5{ a{ • 1 OIi 1 Y {17 51 • 1i.S. 1 x e{ 1 Y I..n.cv3 u•eT.w3< 1 {1 LN1�5 yM1Si'1 1 {1 VN[^ ON LPPM1[P/.TCL] a.1S 11:P[3 _ 11.1 •� / {lIC MN!rX: ale O>rM 31w(7S • O.1 ('•X. /N CITY OF qr RANCHO GL:CALNiO\GA PLANNING DIVISION It HERITAGE PARK ELDERLY APARTMENTS I.KII 1. xVYSxOer eV[V:16i STISC+L ✓ V NORTH ITE.M: 6 �%- ®MP TITLE: ds i Te FLA _ M iIEIT -0 SCALE: ft"'° 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: 5g ?,90 0 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upo: receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, I) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project - PROJECT TITLE: Heritage Park- Rancho Cucamonga. Sunrise - Rancho Cucamongga APPLTCANT$S NAME, ADDRESS,. TELEPHONE: Calmark Development Corp. P.O. Box 2128 Santa-Monica Cali_forr.ia 90406 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Larry Persons, P.O. Box 2128, Santa Monica, California 90406, ( _ ) .,� - 7i lHa rav M_ Strozier, Urban Assist, Inc., 3151 Airway Avenue, Bidg. A -', Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714/556 -9890 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Vacant Land, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County As Parcel # 7n ? -1 Sl -7u LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCS PERMITS: NONE I -1 0 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 n L4 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND.SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, 1F ANy: 9.78 acres - 426 010.8 sF No existing buildings DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL, SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING _lAtORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The project site is Dresentlp vacant undeveloped land supported au rctteti consist of_ south — parking lots fast food restaurants savin a and loan association. and a supermarket._ west — single familv Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? T_Z 4b 4b Explanation of any YES answers above: 29 existinc Eucalvp7 trees which cannot be incorporated into the design of the ro'ect will removed. These trees will be replaced by a landscape plan which will i a mix of the following trees: Platanus Acerifolia, Jacaranda Acutifolia, Brachvchiton Populneus, Cupaniopsi.s Anacardioides, Alnus P.ho bifolia, Eucalyptus Cliriodora, Tristania Conierta, Liquidambar Styracifolia, and Lagerstroemia Lndica. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the DevelopmenP-%Review Committee. Date 12/15182 Signature L-VX041 01K La y Persons Title Protect ..anaeer .Y I -3 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground \ contours? _ x "'. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ x 3. Create a substantial change in denand' for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) ? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How =--n y? 29 x 6.r•- Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: 29 existinc Eucalvp7 trees which cannot be incorporated into the design of the ro'ect will removed. These trees will be replaced by a landscape plan which will i a mix of the following trees: Platanus Acerifolia, Jacaranda Acutifolia, Brachvchiton Populneus, Cupaniopsi.s Anacardioides, Alnus P.ho bifolia, Eucalyptus Cliriodora, Tristania Conierta, Liquidambar Styracifolia, and Lagerstroemia Lndica. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the DevelopmenP-%Review Committee. Date 12/15182 Signature L-VX041 01K La y Persons Title Protect ..anaeer .Y I -3 0 RcESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 0 The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Calr.ark Development Corp., Parcel Map (1579_ 0 * Senior Citizen Project. I -i Parcel 412 of ParM MD V5792 in the City of Rancho Specific Location of Project: Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California i PHASE I PHASE 2 RH;ZZ -3-- Pii%S-- TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 0 0 0 0 0 2. Number of multiple family units: 161 60 48 _ 269 3. Date proposed to begin construction: Earliest date of occupancy: Model f and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range A -1 390 0 16 14 30 B -2 460 0 28 20 48 C -2 530 0 16 14 30 *A -1 320 120 0 0 120 *B -2 410 41 0 0 41 0 * Senior Citizen Project. I -i 11 `•-J 11 y RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ADOPTED LAND USE PLAN OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, that Rancho Cucamonga has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the General Plan encourages affordable housing projects; and WHEREAS, the proposed General Plan Amendment construction cf affordable senior citizen apartment units; is consistent with the General Plan will result in the and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment and Planning Commission policies; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment detrimental to surrounding property. will not be materially injurious or NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cuamtheafollnning Amendmentntodoes the hereby Land Use Plan of the General City Plan Council approve SECTION 1: General Plan Amendment 83 -03: An amendment of the General Plan land Use Plan in the area west of Archibald, and north of Base Line, further described as Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 7827, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A ". This area shall be changed from Medium -High Residential to High Residential. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this General Plan Amendment will not create a significant adverse impact nn the environment and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on February 23, 1983. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST' Secretary of the Planning Commission Resolution No. Page 2 LIA MORE JACK Cucamonga, Secretary of the Planning Cormission of t� 9 do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolut Resolution was of nand�_�' regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning �. �. City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetin° of the Planning Commission held «,!, on the 23rd day of February, 1983 b 9 oissi°n of the y> > y the foliowing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: Co" ISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS• x C ;f 3nN3Fr ' i i i • — �"j jJ cl1 IL c �• Fi [i -_ ^i�I` •_a l of !,► 1 ;, C J e -L (LLJj C a a ¢ Y. aYc C1 G a c -' E;.7 LLI aas r = 4 Ste'. I- sea s r 3nN3Fr ' i i i • — �"j jJ cl1 IL c �• Fi [i -_ ^i�I` •_a l of r� - a \ CU ; Y ao n -= !,► 1 ;, C J e -L (LLJj C a a ¢ aYc C1 G a c -' E;.7 LLI aas r� - a \ CU ; Y ao n -= a 1 ;, C r� - a \ CU ; Y ao n -= 0 e_ a. IC It -': Mve:N3ar — '. J > i 1: Wit,..• -.. Y i jpp Ell j .c /� ®.t M 1 am � A14 \i 8 a c J e -L (LLJj C a a ¢ aYc C1 G a c -' E;.7 LLI aas r = 4 Ste'. I- sea s r 0 e_ a. IC It -': Mve:N3ar — '. J > i 1: Wit,..• -.. Y i jpp Ell j .c /� ®.t M 1 am � A14 \i 8 Ell ^rt'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 9, 1983 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIPONMFNTAI ACCFCCMPNT can onorn 1w.. - A civzsion generally located (APN 202 - 151 -34) Calmark; GPA 83 -03 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION or v.iu acres into 3 parcels within the R- zcne west of Archibald Avenue, north of Base Lin. - Related files: Planned Development 83 -01 - Lewis Properties has submitted the above described parcel map to divide 9.78 acres into 3 parcels to be used as the site for Planned Development 83 -01, which was continued by the Planning Commission to tonight's meeting for the development of 269 apartment units. The site plan for this project is attached. The site is located north of the Alpha Beta Shopping Center a: the corner of Base Line and Archibald Avenue. Access to the site will be provided from Archibald Avenue through a cal -de -sac street (Lomita Court) which will be constrected at the time of development of the parcel. ANALYSIS The developer is proposing 83 -01. The map itself is requirements here have been planned development. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW to create three parcels within Planned Development not proposing any development. All improvement made a part of the conditions o: approval for the Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no aaverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. CORRESPONDENCE Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. ITEM C Planning Commission Staff Report Mar chDgMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7827 Page 2 ' 1983 RECOM,p,EMDATION It is recommended that the Planning Of the project. If, after such COnII°Issior, conside reconenended conditions of consideration the r all input and elements then adoption of the attachedoresolutlontten Commission can su reC°llmended that a �• . �n the City late. er�sport the Nega.,�ve peclaration be would 5e appropriate. Report, ?es ;fully submittoa issued. It is also LBH:V,.jaa Attachments: Map Vicinity Site Plan Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study 11 E3 u \ 3 ED S b 1 \ ' i{ \v�h� \� ter' i._2Ir' I,; C• \'� :;? yam' ) 1/•�`� !1�` : �;"\ \ ` \ ., .l � cJ•� �, .` I \ •�r �`��'^�^ -,rte ••/. � �., � `\ '•\ \ `\ `��l � \� \� '� j yip uE II I it ,• \ � l� i y 3 J j, I �� 1, � i \. 1 �J i i `• t' ! �) � � ! '1, I� _— wznexeALD Iz -I ` ' C. ♦venue � :Y r �I Ig Yj III- -;� . _ � ✓.'- ;� �'� �s , GAY � •SP R s -v � 9 _ m T T%) Iz -I ` ' C. ♦venue � :Y r �I Ig Yj III- -;� . _ � ✓.'- ;� �'� �s , 0 RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7827 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7827), LOCATED WEST OF ARCHIBALD, NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7827, submitted by Lewis Properties, Inc. and consisting of 3 parcels, located west of Archibald, north of Base Line, being a division of parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5792 as recorded in Book 59 of Parcel Maps, pages 74 and 75, records of San Bernardino County; and WHEREAS, on December 27, 1982, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on March 9, 1983, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: ® 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmentaTacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on March 9, 1983. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7827 is approved subject to the recontmendee- onditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , Lnairman Resolution No. Page 2 ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March, 1933, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: n �J CITY OF 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA ® RECOMENDED CDKDITIORS OF APPROVAL 1� LOCATION West of Archibald, north of Base Line TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7827 DATE FILED: December 27, 1982 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5792 as NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 recorded in Book 59 of Parcel Map, Pages 74 &75 GROSS ACREAGE: 9.78 ASSESSOR PARCEL N0. 202- 151 -34 DEVELOPER WNER ENGINEER /SURVEYOR CalMark Development Corp. Lewis Properties Sun Ray Engineering P. 0. Box 21.28 507 East 1st St., #A 125 West Green Street Santa Monica,CA 90406 Tustin, CA 92686 Pasadena, CA 91105 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited ® to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access X 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on t` '-ntative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: X 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C. &P..s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. 11 X 6. All existing quitclaimed requirements. 7. X 8. Surety easements lying within future right -of -way are to be or delineated on the map per City Engineer's Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Portion of Lomita as shown on tentative map to be vacated prior to recordation of map. X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recording for Lomita Court. 2. A lien agreement must be executed pror to recording of the map for the following: X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for the map. Street Improvements 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - section streets. X 3. Construct or provide surety for the following missing improvements prior to recordation for Lomita Court. Street Name Cur & Gutter A.C. Pvmt. Side Walk Drive Appr. Street Trees IStreet Lights A.C. i OverlayIsland* Median Other Lomita Courtl X X X X X I *Includes landscaping and irrigation or meter IAI X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from a ff • dd 't a •« the City Engineers Office, in dv�i�i0n t0 dnyv�i2r perm:�S required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 6. Developer s;iall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved ® by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. �i X 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. E .= 12. Drainage and Flood Control 3 Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent_ areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer X 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineering for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff Grading Y 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Ah Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. X 4. The rough grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: Cal Trans for San Bernardino County Floo Control District_ X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga -- County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not ® guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to builaiii;; permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), ccpies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: �3 CI'T'Y OF RAnCT?J C: ^. AMOir^% INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Com-mr-ittee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of tle Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) a^he project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. ARL PROJECT TI'T'LE: Heritage Park - Rancho Cucamonga, Surrise- Rancho Cucamonga APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Calmark Development Corp. P.O. Box 2128. Santa-Monica, California 90406 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Monica, California 93406, (,' Assist, Inc., 714/556 -9890 LOCATION OF Tway OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED Larry Persons, P.O. Box 2128, Santa S) -s iardv *t. Strozier, Urban nue, bldg. A -2, Costa Nesa. CA 92626 PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) ird, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: NONE El I -1 (�w t�: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 16 -40l ' OF PROJECT; 269 167 ,,.,;... �- - - — ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: o No existin buiidin s 78 acres - 426,OI0.8 SF DESCRIBE THE ENVIR r INCLUDING INFORMATIOONIQ O AL SETTING OF THE PRO. FCT SITE ANIMALS, TO- OGRAP_, PLANTS (TREES) , OF SURROUNDING PRROOPRERTIESSTORZCAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE EXISTING STRUCTnRF ' AND THE DESCRIPTION Or' ANY S AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The project site is nrec.,.,a.. ri aart inn iotr ociation and a su ez - vacant exec t for t corner orthwest - ks: north — o,__, n>storical or scenic aspects evidentron and the no known cultural, property. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cuDlatiol actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? Y -2 41 CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of say ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the revelopmenU--Review Committee- Date 12/15/82 Signature V41V1 La y Persons Title Project . anger I -3 S WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO _ s 1. Create a substantial change in grour_d contours? _ x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _! x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remuve any existing trees? How many? 29 X 6.z--Create the need for use or disposal of r potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: 29 existinc Eucal ® trees which cannot Le incorporated into the desien of the project will b removed. These trees will be replaced by a landscape plan which will in a mix of the following trees: Platanus Acerifolia, 5acararda Acutifolia BrachVGhlton Populneus, Cuaaniovsis Anacaraioides, Alnus Rhombifolia, _ Eucalyptus citrioaOra, Tristania Conferta, Liquidambar Styracifolia, and Lagerstroemia Indica. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of say ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the revelopmenU--Review Committee- Date 12/15/82 Signature V41V1 La y Persons Title Project . anger I -3 S 0 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following irfoz:ration should be 0 Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the City of Rancho Cucamonga district to acco=nodate the proposed residential developee t. the school development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Calmark Development Corp., Parcel Map #5792 Parcel #2 of arce Specific Location Of Project: o —1 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California i - 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number Of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model # and # of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price ewe A -1 390 B-2 460 C-2 530 *A -1 320 *B-2 410 * Senior Citizen Project. TEASE I PHASE 2_ PISL-+Q TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 161 60 48 259 0 16 14 30 0 28 20 - 48 0 16 14 30 120 0 0 _ 120 41 0 0 41 Z -4 U E CITY OF RANCHO CUC AMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 9, 1983 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer W.. Barbara Kral 1, Engineering tecnnician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. AND PARCEL MAP residential subdivision of .585 acres within the 1 on the south side of Devon Street at Kinlock Avenue & 10) PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION :NBO. INC. - A -1 zone located (APN 208 - 851 -09 Penbe, Inc. has submitted the above -described tentative parcel map to subdivide .585 acres into 3 parcels within the R -1 zone. The public hearing for this project was continued at the Planning Commission's meeting held on February 9, 1983 at the request of the applicant. There are no existing structures on the site. To the north and west are existing single family dwellings and to the east is vacant land. Tentative Tract 12040, a condominium tract, has been approved for development to the south of this site. The General Plan designation is low - medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to the north, east and west with the designation of medium (40 -14 dwelling units per acre) to the south. ANALYSIS Tentative Parcel, Map 7812 consists of Lot 2: and 22 of previously recorded Tract Map No. 9337 and an unused portion of Kinlock Avenue. Kinlock Avenue is unpaved and is being used for drainage at this time. Tentative Tract No. 12040, located south of the subject parcel map, has been conditioned to install a storm drain through this unpaved portion of Kinlock to connect with Deer Creek Channel. This storm drain will be constructed in the easement as shown on the subject parcel map. With the construction of the storm drain, this portion of Kinlock Avenue will not be needed and can be vacated. Since this site cannot be built on until the proposed storm drain is in place, a condition stating that building permits will be not issued until the construction is completed has been imposed. Kinlock Street will be vacated concurrent with final map approval. ITEM D Planning Commission Staff ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT March 9, 1983 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REViEN Report AND PARCEL MAP 7812 Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. CORRESPONDENCE Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration of the Commission can support the recommended ccrditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution, would be appropriate. it is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. Attachments: Map Resolution City Engineer's initial Study Report E 11 0 0 Ll r- I� Y �W i � =L7 — j I t I 4 1;11.,1 r7r^�T = "t II �_ I I i II I j IN1 � � i i S6T � i E_ I W Tentative Tr.12040_ .. ¢ I W I fI s t — �J CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,%,!ONGA title; ENGINEERING DIVISION T VICINITY MAP 1 page cW' pw W� a. i lit i k C WX W__u17iQ. oil k, s $ � I --r -- tII as El 0 I � Q rwN t L< Z -1 Iz WLIJ ED � tV �••iill W 1 I � Q rwN t L< Z -1 WLIJ ED I x =E �Z�• �iY x ZZ ij t -1 � tV �••iill W 1 x =E �Z�• �iY x ZZ •ia Vs ti -1 � tV �••iill W 1 t' J a �c L l •ia Vs ti CITY OF RANCHO CUCAPIONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project- PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Parcel Map No. 7812 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:— (213) 380 -3171 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Linville- Sanderson & Associates ATTN: Gary Sandeson LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) cie of Devon Street at Kinlock Avenue (208 - 851 -04 & 10) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: City of Rancho CUCgnga - planning Cortsnission and City Council — r..R,nnnn r„��nry Water District LnaTTeY UUI i : � NW I -1 0 11 PROJECT DESCRIPTION RIPTION OF PROJECT: ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA A-ND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECFSSARY SHEETS): Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? NC I -2 ® 0 IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date Signature e Title ' YC� , 1-3 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO _ X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? flow many? _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of anv YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date Signature e Title ' YC� , 1-3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: 2. Number of single family units: 2. dumber of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model # and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range K] PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 13M TOTAL 0 RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7812 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO, 7812), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF DEVON STREET AT KINLOCK AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7812, submitted by Penbe, Inc. and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the south side of Devon Street at Kinlock Avenue, being a division of lots 21 and 22, and that portion of Y.inlock Avenue, Tract 9337 as recorded in Book 134, pages 65 and 66, Records of San Bernardino County, California; and WHEREAS, on December 21, 1982, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on March 9, 1983, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on March 9, 1983. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7812 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 BY Jeffrey King, Chairman Resolution No. Pace 2 ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E I-] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOWNDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: Seuthside of Devon. TENTATIVE MAP NO. Parcel Map 7812 at Kinlock Avenue DATE FILED: December 21, 1982 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. A division of Lots NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 21 & 22 and that portion of Kinlock Ave, GROSS ACREAGE: -585 Tract 9337 as recorded in Book 134, Pages ASSESSOR PARCEL N0. 208- 851 -09 & 10 ecor s 7 San burr r in dungy DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER /SURVEYOR Penbo, Inc. same Linville- Sanderson & Assoc. 10 Hancock 9587 Arrow Rte., Ste. H Irvine, CA 92714 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited is to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C. &R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be requirements, or delineated on t!: map per City Engineer's 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. X 8. A separate application. must be filed for vacation of Kinlock Avenue_ Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfactio of the City Engineer and City Attornev, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recording for all parcels. 2- A lien agreement must be executed pror to recording of the map for the following: X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion all all on -site drainage facilities necessary for e 9 parcels to the sa isfact,on of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for all parcels. Street Improvements 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, Parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half- section streets. X 3. Construct or provide surety for the following missing improvements Prior to recordation of the map: urive Street Street A.C, �— Street Name Gutter Pvmt Walk Appr Trees Me Devon s Eights Overlayl Isl *Includes landscaping and irrigation or meter X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. 11 X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an ® encroachment permit. X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. 1O.Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and app :-oved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. 11.Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control X 1. Private drainage easements For cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study fir the project shall be submitted to the City Engineering for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Stardards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff ►:_•J Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Cuilding Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of CalSfornia to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. x_ 4. Tha rough grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be t^m;leted prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. _X 5. Final grading plans fnr each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety b �icn for ...,nrcval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: _ CalTrans for San Bernardino County X_ Cucamonga County Wate _ San Bernardino County issuance of a grading Other Flood Control District 41 District for sewer and water Dust Abatement (required prior to permit) 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance `s required. The water district requires the 6" waterline on Parcel 2 be cut and capped to their satisfaction. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans,San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject_ to any requirements that may be received from them. X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County 'dater District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. permits will not be issued unless said certification is received 4n writing. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. — x 10.At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. li.Tentative Tract 12040 located south of the property must be recorded prior to final approval of this map and the vacation of Kiniock Avenue. x_ 12.The proposed storm drain from Kinlock Avenue to Deer Creek Channel shall be constructed prior to issuance of any building permits. This condition will be waived provided the constructicn is completed along with Tract 12040. x 13.Devcn Street shall be reconstructed for full width from Kiniock Avenue to east project boundary to eliminate the existing cross gutters and to do related revisions to drainage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This work shall be coordin?ted with that of the Tract 12040. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlONGA LLOYD B. HUSSS, CITY U SIREER by: 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA2NIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 9, 1983 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP i?47 - AMERON. INC. - A division of 6.2 acres into 3. parcels within Subarea of the Industrial Specific Plan generally located on the south side of Arrow, Route, west of Etiwanda Avenue - (APN 223 - 121 -32 and 229- 131-13) PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION Ameron, Inc. has submitted the above-described parcel map to resubdivide existing two parcels into three parcels. The proposed parcel is presemly vacant. Parcels 2 & 3 are developed with industrial buildings and storage areas as an operational part of Ameron. To the northeast of the map is the main industrial building of Ameron and to the southwest is Tamco, an affiliate of Ameron. Te the east and west of this project area are vacant lots and to the south is the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad. ANALYSIS The purpose of this map is to create a separate lot for the vacant portion of the pror.2rty and to combine the existing parking with the developed portion of the parcels. The subdivider is not proposing any development at this time. Parc.31s 2 & 3 have 25 -foot wide frontage each on Arrow Route. All of parcel 1 fronts onto Arrow Route. Widening of Arrow Route contiguous to parcel 1 will be required at the time of development on the parcel. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Also attached for your review and consideration is Part 1 of the initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review or the Initial Study and field investigation. Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. ITEM E Planning Commission Staff Report ENVIRONMENTAL A SESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7847 March 9, 1983 Page 2 Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Pcsting at the site has also been completed. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration of the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, than adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also - -ecommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. Respectfully submi V LBY,:BK:Jaa ` Map Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study E. . 0 1 �-J � I itirceL I powceI x P�e-> 3 ------------------ - - - --- i .Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ,TONGA title; a ° 1O ENGINEERING DIVISiON �T u VICINITY MAP 1 �I page s r a e a ;ta i i SF i .c i 1 I a3 I I ,1 I i l 1 i I I I , r 1 I I I I I ' 1 I I I I i I I j 1 I ' I t , I 1 i I t i I � 1 f i I I I � 1 . L J � I , • - x i a � I 0 E ti -41 co 6 74 1% III t Z LLJ W4, et LLJ I r a e a ;ta i i SF i .c i 1 I a3 I I ,1 I i l 1 i I I I , r 1 I I I I I ' 1 I I I I i I I j 1 I ' I t , I 1 i I t i I � 1 f i I I I � 1 . L J � I , • - x i a � I 0 E C CITY OF RPIJCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will.be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Parcel ','lap No. 7847 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: (213) 268 -4111 NI.ME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO SE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Gary T. Sanderson / (714) 980 -1211 Linville- Sanderson & Associar°_s, g5R7 Arrnw 4cn!p� Cnita Ciiram -nna r'm 91730 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 C 0 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: W IC 011 -- fo:- acces Consolidate two exist Is into ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Total area is 57± acres. Total area pY'ppOSed DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONVENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION OHI TTORICALHOR SCE IC ASPECTS, USE IM ANALS, Ally CULTURAL, OF SURROUNDING PROPERTI•S• AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (SEE ATTACHED SHEETS A & B) Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? NO I -2 WILT, THIS PROJECT: YES NO _ X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ X 3. Create a substantial cnange in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ X 4. Create changes in, the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date 1 -27 -83 Signature is Title Vice President & Secretar I- 3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to ald in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: _ PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model # and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range I -4 TOTAL 11 0 11 „A„ DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The project site lies in the southeastern portion of Rancho Cucamonga. The portion is bounded on the north by Arrow Route, on the west by Southern California Edison easement (vacant land), on the south by A.T. & S.F. Railroad right -of -way, and on the east by an existing scrap processor plant and vacant land. The land gently slopes from north to south at approximately 1z %. The s-te drainage is controlled by concrete pipe, gutters, and a concrete ditch at the southerly property line. The west por- tion drains to the west along the railroad right -of -way. The east portion drains to the east along the same railroad right -of way. Vegetation consists of trees along the private driveway. The site has no apprent cultural, hisorical or scenic aspects. The animal life is presumed to consist of small birds, rodents, and reptiles indigenous to the local area. Proposed parcel 1 has no structures or buildings. Parcel 2 has two buildings (wire mill) with a total of 122,000 - sq. ft. and a railroad spur on -site. Parcel 3 has a guard house (40 sq. ft.), change room for employees (2,850 sq. ft), office building (11,6 30 sq. ft.), rolling mill and maintenance building (77,600 sq. ft.), and a finishing building (15,000 sq. ft.). The surrounding land uses are industrial. m C� G J W v Lv Z tli 3 _ a �>, % O E t~ co to a eC a iv ? cn cL dZ Q. 0 0 °' d' 0 � J w v' t o � � I a t a I S t 1VIN3AIM®; 3 Vh18d t 0. �/ S _ O �� o 1N3W3SV3 '3'o'S -- 3 _ a �>, % O E t~ co 7 RESOLUTION NO_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7847 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7847), LOCATED ON THE SOOTY. SIDE or ARROW ROUTE, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE WHEtcEAS, Tc�,+tative Parcel Map Number 7847, submitted by Ameron, Inc. Lind consisting of 11 parcels, located on the south side of Arrow Route, west of E`_iwanda Avenue, being a division of a portion of Lot 1, Tract 5377, Map Book 62, page 90 and parcel 1 of Parcel Map 2421, Parcel Map Book 22, page 20; and WHEREAS, on January 30, 1983, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above- described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on March 9, 1933, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: ® 1. That the map is consistent with Lhe General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. S. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on March 9, 1983. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7847 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: is Jeffrey King, Chairman Resolution No. Page 2 ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK !AFA, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1•J 11 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA nECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: southside of Arrow, west or tiwanda TENTATIVE MAP NO. DATE FILED: -January 20, 1983 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A division of a oor" on NUMBER OF LOTS: of Lot 1 Tract 5377. M.B. 62/90 and GROSS ACREAGE: 62 229-121-32 parcei 1 of Parcel Map 2421, P.M.B. 22/20 ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 229 - 131 -13 ENGINEER /SURVEYOR Ameror., Inc. Linville- Sanderson & Assoc. 4700 Ramona Blvd. 9587 Arrow Route, Ste. H Monterey Park, CA 91754 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Improverent and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Munic2pal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited to, th^_ following: Dedications and Vehicular Access Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative crap. Dedication shall be made following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on following rights -of -way on the Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: Reciprr =a', access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and Joint maintenan =e of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.c and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. X 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map pqr City Engineer's requirements. _ 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to building permit issuance for Parcel 1. 2. A lien agreement must be executed pror to recording of the map for the following: X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guz.- anteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering ali parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to issuance of building permit for Parcel 1. Street Improvements ? Construct full street improvements including, but nct limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all int_rior streets. 2 A minimum of 25 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -fool wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half- section streets. X 3. Construct or provide surety for the following missing improvements prior to building permit issuance for Parcel 1. Curb &! A.C. Side Drive Street Street ( A.C. Street Name Gutter! Pvmt.a Walk Appr. Trees Lights ,Overlay Median] Island*10therl Arrow Rte. X X X X X X i *Includes landscaping and irrigation or meter u Ll 11 LJ X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay fcr the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lines of 12KV cr less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Ranchc Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underqround service. lo. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. 12. Drainage and Flood Control X i. 3rivate orainage ed5eCle .0 . v. 1.= v»-.v° "• "••••'�` -- r_q_'r�d and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisior.- shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted ;.o the City Engineering for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall bp in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading Practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading .- mittee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. 5. 'inal grading Fans for each parcel are to be submitted to the ::ilding and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements —ad Approvals 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: Calirans for San Bernardino County Cucamonga County 'date San Bernardino County issuance of a grading Other Flood Control District District for sewer and water Dust Abatement_ (required prior to permit) 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone. 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X b. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies in,•oived. Approval of the final rap will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. CJ X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga Count; .later District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance —� with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. Chino Basin Municipal Water District owns and operates the N.R.W. System which lies within Arrow Hwy. adjacent to this tract and in an easement on the west side of the map. As Chino Basin Municipal �® Water District is a public agency serving the City of Rancho �p Cucamonga, the developer of the subdivision shall be responsible for any relocation, modification or other construction on this system required due to the development of the subdivision. Such work shall include but not be limited to adjusting valves to grade, realignment of lines to allow other utilities to be constructed and other similar construction. if any modifications or adjustment t� District facilities is desired, plans shall be approved by the District before proceeding. CITY OF RANCHO CUCARONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 9, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning 'ommission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL 83 -02 - I G{YlNI1YC IICaLI 1G.�UG — RMl \LIiV VL1\1 u\ — n ..elunyc VI �.V =1c from R -3 Mu.tip a Family Residential to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development) and the development of 88 units arranged as four - plexes on 6.4 acres located south of Base Line, on the west side of Hellman - APN 208 - 011 -02, 04, 71. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Requested Action: To change the zoning from R -3 to R -3 /PD, and approval of site plan, elevations, and subdivisicn map. B. Purpose: Development of 88 units arranged as four - plexes. C. Locaticn: South of Base Line, west side of Hellman (Exhibit D. Size: 6.4 acres E. Existing Zoning: R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) F. Existing Land Use: One older residence, otherwise vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin North - one 5ingle Fama.y Resi ence, vacant; AP South - SPRR; citrus orchard; R -1 East - Office, single family tract; AP; R -1 West - Single Family tract, park; R -1 H. General Plan: Project Site - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) North - Office South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Office, Low Residential We.,t - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac), Park, Civic /Community ITEM F I t = larrro; 2 /ianCho Center Play^ r.;.,, ^n :enaa Kdrr� _ pa -,t, Cnaracteristics: The southwestern half of the site is a i1 with slopes averaging 17 percent. The northeastern half of -- site moderately slopes to the southwest at a 5 percent Zrace. A minor drainage course 10 -15 feet wide and 3 -4 feet �eeo bisects the site from the northwest corner of the site to axisting culvert at railroad tracks (Exhibit "F"). Two dozen mature trees of differing varieties; entire site covered with low weeds and grasses. Dirt paths run through the site from Heilman to Lions Park. Thick Eucalyptus windrow off -site along west boundary. J. Aaplicable Regulations: R -3 and planned development combining districts permit four -plex ustits; no minimum lot size; 2.2 parking spaces per unit. II. A "ALYSIS• A. General: Storm drain connection from Lions Park to existing culvert at railroad right -of -way requires extensive grading. Gradii:g concept will "balance" site by using soil from cutting hill for necessary fill for drainage ( "Exhibit "J "). Stepped building pads will be used to minimize cut as much as possible. Temporary access road with landscaping will be provided from Base Line and emergency access to Hellman. Hellman Avenue street improvements will be postponed to coincide with storm drain improvements. A temporary asphalt sidewalk will be required from railroad tracks to Base Line to provide a safe Pedestrian pathway, which is part of a school route. 8. Design Review: The Committee has worked witti the applicant to resolve concerns relative to the site plan layout, recreation space, and Hellman streetscape. The site plan has been revised to include a variety of setbacks from private streets which increases open space around units. Grading Nas been altered to provide a gently rolling lawn area for recreation at the southwest corner. Increased setbacks, hounding, wrought -iron fencing and specimen size trees will be utiized along Hellman Avenue. C. Environmental Review: Based upon the Initial Study, the project W411 not have a significant effect upon the environment because Of the mitigation measures below: Impact: Substantial cut into hill will result in 2.1 slope. Mitigation: Stepped building pads; hill already graded to the west with pads and 2:1 slopes. 0 E- E r,dnne- >iorent 33 -02 /Rancho Center Plannin7 :.o- -fission Agenda Marcn 9. Page 3 i'loact: Construction will increase surface water runoff and reduce absorption rates. '•titiaation: Storm drains and inlet structures will be provided. Impact: Development will block traditional path to schools through property which bypasses hazardous traffic situations and discontinuous sidewalks .-)n Hellman at railroad. Mitigation: Temporary sidewalk required from rail:oad to Base Line. III. FACTS FOR FINDING: The subdivision map has been prepared in accordance with City standards ai.d policies and the project site is suitable for the proposed subdivision. The project design is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for oT against this project. '1. RECO;VENDATION: :t is recommended that the Planning Commission consider a material anti elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding and conditions of approval, adoption cf the attached Resolutions and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfull,{,9submitted, Ri 4 Gomel - City Planner RG:DC:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Subdivision Map Ext ' -it "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Natural Features Map Exhibit "G" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "H" - Floor Plans Exhibit "I" - Elevations Exhibit "J" - Grading Section Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions pq f .; i i CITY OF ITEM: R A�\CHO CUCANNIONGA Tn-LE: T�!►�T '1'i 1 PLANNING DivisION Ett ;It3tT= �— SOLE C5 � NURTH BASE ZINC I I � X11 ! `rte f N f .; i i CITY OF ITEM: R A�\CHO CUCANNIONGA Tn-LE: T�!►�T '1'i 1 PLANNING DivisION Ett ;It3tT= �— SOLE C5 � NURTH 3A$1e;_ 2 I b i 1 " 1 L t � P R , / CITY OF RA\TCHO CUCAN•IONG -A PLANNI \G DIVIRON i \X P� v rl ITEM: 1 z15 & 70 T1TLERD sm EXHUT = SCALE. �' m • ,N� 1 � 1 i i 1 �_• ^�II T 3A$1e;_ 2 I b i 1 " 1 L t � P R , / CITY OF RA\TCHO CUCAN•IONG -A PLANNI \G DIVIRON i \X P� v rl ITEM: 1 z15 & 70 T1TLERD sm EXHUT = SCALE. �' m • ,N� c x _ " R a k�x _:rte _ _� -�.— �-C.�' �• � _ _ � i \ f. •• I ` `�/'�-- l rT•. i- w ' Q _~1. � �1��.. iss � i : � _ r-•�. f"�� 111 • ` ' / Air- IL XF '' \L. i .. �� t_r —.tea `�i� %'a1• c �-`�'..,� W �iu1 "Y_ ^�_ ��. it �� • _ ;� -_ .•.. ,may. r I ti ,. NOZrH CITY OF ® RANCHO CUCANIONGA -- M-P& Z PLA-NI I G E\MI3rr ---V— SCaLE: �• r_ BASE UNE le IT �.� � �,•�� � � 1 ! . mil. � �1... -. ..,.� e.'..-�. IS •w / 461 M. , I 11< r y: d Jai L.: NORTEK CITY OT ITB I: zo — RANCHO CUCAAI0NG k nn.E: 0- PLANNING DI\,,lStON EXHIM -i - SG%,LE= Um • r1 E 7 r ' 1�II n v J ', \ •,�� � t �`� � -t Cam. a . \ � �• _. has � ,i I _ r. ♦ o� l i i i' CITY OF RA\CHU CUCAMONGA PLkIVNING UIVISKYN 1� ltORl[1 ITEM. qL P JAL y�� pV�� ro SCALE, 1 \ 1, + i^� ' • \r JI. n ,,fitt. ♦� ,Ill•• Ln IGI�' : :,, ai ..,- , _.. �- ���'i.\ C� cl- ^ V \\ ill, - A . \�• �`� _ ST • � M��� • J ', \ •,�� � t �`� � -t Cam. a . \ � �• _. has � ,i I _ r. ♦ o� l i i i' CITY OF RA\CHU CUCAMONGA PLkIVNING UIVISKYN 1� ltORl[1 ITEM. qL P JAL y�� pV�� ro SCALE, - x--1;4 �.I � �r •�j � �j �� � ._,� -- • �� �': FAG j, � i ='' < CITY OF RAi\'CHO CUCA1,IO\G,)L PL ANT"NI. \G EXVISION FORTH FBI: e` Is s ugm TrrLE =5rm L1'Pi1 -be 4�'1 _ EXHiI`,iT= _ SCALE: e�•.� E 11 T 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANNIONGA IT-uNNINc �R ov NORTH ITEM= Z EXHIBIT. A+-V ALE, � LJ E Gu1JZc '� � �•••- CITY OF I* RANCHO CUCANIO\GA PLiNNI \G DIVMON G V NORTH ITE:NI: "7r !Z3 &Z TITLE= to LOsVgo" td*AS EXHIMT: jo-ItIp SOLE: T" m �IA rs! �s 7 �i f0 1 CITY OF R,A\CHO CL'C ANNIONGA PLANNING DIV SION •p i00 "n V: 131-0 ITEM-- wi 17 SGT Z 0� TITLE2� ®'Iod suco�QiV EXHIBIT= SCALE: ® C--,T--f OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITT_AL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this fora must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part T -I of the initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take aoticn no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a sigr_ificant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. ® PROJECT TITLE: RANCHO CENTER ASSOCIATES /FOUR PLEXES E APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: (714) 989 -1767 7333 Hellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 RANCHO CENTER ASSOCIATES NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Douglas R hone ��' : ' .�, LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) -t al.- CW ...v r... -..- M--. l ino AA L Tic ?loran �tlP_ LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Easement from San Bernardino Flood Control District I -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 22 Fcur Plexes /Planted DevelonsAnt an annro . 6.4 acres * *—See A+ta hed project desc intien ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 6.4 ncr !ter S.f.) Existing dwellings will he removed. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOG:.APiiY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL„ HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No. El I -2 r tE ly WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial chance in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial chance in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 55 x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: Portion of the property _will be loo center portion of the property wil: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. R ncho ender Ass ci_ates Date January 20, 19835ignature By: Dplugias K. H ne Title General Partner 1-3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION . The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamon40 Planning Division in order to aid in. assessing the ability o£ the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.:�anch� Aeon ;a oa Specific Location of Project: Tent. Tr. No. J �45 ' Cnitt -fi a Hellman Avenue PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PEASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: N/A 2. Number of multiple 22 Four Plexes family units: 88 FaMily Units 3. Date proposed to begin construcr_ion: Sept. 83 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Jan. 84 Model and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range ** Four Plex units are not being built for sale but will be retained for rental purposes Twenty -two (22) three bedroom units Sixty -six (66) two bedroom units I -4 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 83 -02 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -3 TO R -3 /PD FOR 88 FOUR -PLEX UNITS, LOCATED SOUTH OF BASE LINE, ON THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN WHEREAS, on the 1st day of February, 1983, an application was filed and accepted on the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 9th day of March, 1983, the Planning Commmission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission, has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. 2. That the proposed Zone Charge would not have Is significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. That the proposed Zone Change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: .he Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on March 9, 1983. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 9th day of March, 1983, Planned Development No. 83 -02. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Deveiopment No. 83 -02. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission ® shall be forwarded to the City Council. Resolution No. Page 2 E 4. All Conditions of Approval applicable to Tentative Tract No. 12362 shall apply to this Planned Development. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA; -1ONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Consnission I, JACK LAM,, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and reqularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March, 1983, by the following vote -to -Hit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 0 RESOLUTION NO. t A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12362 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12362, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Rancho Center Associates, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a development of 88 units arranged as four - plexes on 6.4 acres, located south of Base Line, on the west side of Hellman into 23 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on March 9, 1983; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports Znd has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12362 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; �f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the ® property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. Page 2 (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12362, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION I. Temporary landscaping, including 15- gallon size trees, shall be provided along both sides of the access road to Base Line. In addition, off -site landscaping shall be provided along the northern property line of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 6395. 2. The temporary access road to Base Line shall include a sidewal}: to provide separate pedestrian access to the project. 3. A wrought iron fence, specimen size trees, and mounding shall be provided in the Hellman Avenue Streetscape. 4. The emergency access lane to Heilman Avenue shali be constructed of decomposed granite overlain, with topsoil and grass. ENGINEERING DIVISION 5. Parcel Map 6395 shall be recorded prior to recordation of the tract map or the issuance of building permits. 6. All conditions contained in the resolution of approval for Parcel Map 6395 shall also apply to this tract. 7. Installation of a portion of master planned storm drain across the subject property from Base Line to the existing Cucamonga drain with all on -site and off ..site easements shall be required. The cost of installation of the drain shall be credited to the storm drain fee and a reimbursement agreement will be executed per Section 8 of the City Ordinance No. 75 to cover contributions which exceed the fee amount. I] 11 E 11 Resolution No. Paae 3 Q 9. An in -lieu cash deposit shall be required for street improvements along Hellman Avenue for future installation. An access road from Base Line Road shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 10. A temporary asphalt caving sidewalk shall be constructed on the west side of Hellman Avenue from the railroad tracks nortl to the existing sidewalk. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DA:Y OF MARCH, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I 11 F] E It s O G O z C O O V G K C N O 6 LL O N 9C C V l 4 v i L V J V• VO�r T� V7N p' ^�Ut CCO ?� Tc c °° $ Lm_o �'vN _ac ... Lv a•�p E x m^ L Lo 'o ocE '-'v:•v C y — �N �a uL O A -'2 - C Q O r °c � T w• M- V F as - TAD G 9 uV. u e L- -V NOM u1 J.� � �9 7u LUO rT >O ' O C L- ---J .J V ' L � 7 C N V� •-i j N- F 3 O..C. 7 U SLv C _ te APP N . O N V` NI N q 0 C O N _S A� L•V - N r C L •++� � 1aG - � N Y C- L O N A r O � C d a O V C � d _ Y O S ,- p 9 .+LO t+q °� jnpC C �C N A C El °' =v LL �.. W � A No ,A.,N °iNC v•L„A o J L _c C C� C. C ^' A L f N 9 N 9 L x_ V, i 0 ` T� �- N •� � �� d Nd � L'LL Ad y0� at N„ P� �.+ pV LA VLN -rA _ QCl qPC o AA •. —oW rI d N „ GpG 1„1 L�J �6l° r C QN�pW y C� � O'O L 4 CO r � O C • Y O q 9 C �'^ A O � Y � � � �� d FI r � °� >I N ^ Y i U O N •� � m' T � �� u � O p N u Z V u� A L n r tj C a O b � N L 4 P Cy w• C V A O T O i V.^ L i a v q � 9 Y V C a~ r r M u L a L ^ N O LL ��� �� O J J .r V C •- - S C- A N rn V - MG r 'V4 G� V J�06Y P 6V� 6TGLd 4w6a QAFO] Qa HC.N -NC s O G O z C O O V G K C N O 6 LL O N 9C C V l 4 v i L V J V• VO�r T� V7N �T ^�Ut CCO ocE C C A w L � E O 4 C Q O r °c � T w• F - TAD G 9 uV. u e W- - SLv C _ te APP N . O N V` NI N q 0 C O N L q Air d _ Y p 9 .+LO t+q °� jnpC C �C N A C El °iNC V �Y rY -rA _ o AA •. —oW rI N „ GpG 1„1 L�J �6l° Oi �O C QN�pW 60 G ^I O FI >I It tj a C m a I x v q 6 E C i 6 w 6 O A V• y� p � O N d G G _ c n N G� �] N N 6 N O N U� V -` y_ C ✓O n✓ q i✓ G V G u r p•°.. q t' ✓ W SC d x « � ✓pO `° .__ ✓aCgT ni } d r c✓q `�•yc �V Eq r G O "V' -� t C+a� N q Gp C n C L r d n 4 a .� ^' •O v .� >> -i 4c - O E N .� ry q� u G �- _•• L `o bo J✓ d `i >Y ^V q q _ _ _✓ aN- ro dE✓ NO CIV.1 ECG � q`> '•1� � r �� T X00 -J'�E cc sL C, mtq °'•G E� u o - -�- -__? �o =c i� W oc ✓a L G._- ✓d �+.N+3.L ✓c q E u � •^JO �• °�•_� -bd or AObi.E m ^qN acs cG G n qn oy A =.�__ � „ ^nA . O L w d O p V q y O. q ✓ Q G r V N r L .. C ^J j 'J vN✓ nV q✓ -O qGD PA V NV9b ✓ .V... •✓i•` O •r V d g C- G• U q ✓ N ✓Nir O O Jr c G✓ L W V E L✓ J- O L O: c D L N '° L« C O d V «� � r j q =� N n N Y J d V q y G_ L d C p✓ Q _ G 9 T ^ > n C G� �. � O F i V i 6 -J yq O NdV O_ uV•� q�n ^ 00 COi... ql Vr. d ✓>G. ✓V ✓Tq g CyL �C Cn 6 9 n L q n ✓q `u0 APO rL N�c�d N6L yQ + c S! ✓L N C d COPq A =^ V V I q^ ^ O Vb� S O b V N d N D« a V 0 4 V J q q 0 • V +J S_ r q J._ JC” Y C LL rF Y` V��q ,rV NLOq pA4._ �+"L O ='L Qy.°r N N °u+c �`o V q qr _= u N•GO �`c. o G u A c or.. N b'. � _ �•` N _ N r i V .`� F .0 « N N y q0✓�N Jam•`.• ✓cO gDVO �W O 6 C° _O °V C - cq`V ON ✓C ��w ✓ .., G - C D C✓ G>' E C< r d q q^ V �' P j i q V O q D q � G� .j N 0 c� 2 y ,°. ✓ O { I 6 C^ �y C L p 6 O x V V V ✓- i O 6- n92 iq2- -fin '� d- Q Qp rq pj d•JnOGI ^9N � CI ^N6q _ ✓I 14 4 � � 4I � T 4 9I 1 f O W 1 N = d✓ �r N q O = O V ^ P r O d' P✓ i L q✓ _✓ A _ c d M q nN Fr ✓c 00 r> «✓tr ✓V✓ ^ ^ J q •Oic C =r G V V✓ N J G L O P L Q^ � O q q N «C N y•°. W A V L q° E✓✓ L C d f', aLi tl 7 - O'G L d '°r u 0� n� N 4E. >• c i d A _ y gCSY Or NV i+N' G N G 6Vr VVo O� m •"•O q!' O Y P i dNy � E r �° L`✓ V 06 ✓EV rVq�O'N^n O nEN �q�T d ` 9•Jn O�y° qCG� _ ..• dq�`J LN✓ V c ✓ J E A r'•• � L N C q � N V= O p ✓ L q j L n L G C V V n d✓ y -' O G ' � q 0 d N v W q G � •�- >^ °VUr ✓� ¢NCe D D 'N -o � conc ID -c @L - �CyG O D 9JiV �O•• glu'9 q LD�n >D ^r °d q q V( Ct. V• J IT9C 1_ ✓ N T n L S d j= E = O L C O V O � C � A V V. I d l_ T ✓ N O q � r •'J r C •� d v i � c G Q ✓ V O �• E o - B A N E �- T� o ✓� «'r _r `O C r 9« u n O _ ✓ O 9 q i ��- C C C U° N V q x^ V W O O V` I O �= �On d q NC -M Err GL6 9 p' = V 2 .O N- q N } N P `gOOrd •C O N ° -c .« C Nj j EON > C� A C c O ,� G •] N } n c L •" •r!`O+ q Guw- n- O O � NGL ^u l � y V C C?.ZO Y C= C U - °q G= V V�_ y C'T'�')r^ � N> V•r O� g q 2 G Q r q O N V' y✓ c L g O > O '� E✓y G ✓ L 6 E J O O N u G D r G q N � O b C L L V J✓ V .•.f �'� c ` G L G✓ ODC V C� Gqd✓ 1'1C ✓1] _ P >_ _ _° G L•• Oq q =q0•r C'D6 CV ✓j �GC.V.. _U _ c ^° : qu V « r i c d Cq Y d N � ^G Li''�`..•]•gV .n p" •> � O ^gOEC i�`�° i r '_ 'SL i- be of c✓ "° `• o E Gq ci• M °.. e��N o ..� _ L ° 0 M. O J V g q V' N P O 0� u T '•' V` OVO �✓ PL �. T t O p n,' O O O V'- N O ✓I � V N 'J _ � J+ G C� 4 q r d _ q i. � a q J q P i b q tS G q G C g C D t •tea J. T t. • -✓ J O- N v - V C l N .V J L m- C./J•.- Ei• +i ✓N o,2- �L ✓.- _ __ _ q -J�.�C O+ � VOi� 6� CG ^ -.l rY GC QE' ✓6 ��6JL nG O.r t�n4NL ✓+ G' NI FII �I OI PI � � CI 1 1 u G.rV OGTO- L O� {VC .y L.`q qVU O�q °� u d L6 9~q W L✓if� ._.•� r gG^°1r✓ t l n+. L � `L• G L� rJ 7 y � d i d r G T n jEy U'O ^ Z9q 'J '• LnOn VU VO• G q PVm I�nNC _ `O _'Pa�L° ^ O TOL VV PLO• r0� � yO V 7 _ .Ln u ✓ L _V O r a Y 6 U N r L 9 ` O •". L° L` ' V V T >.^ C O V L U'� L O CJ L ' p c � n > u✓ O V q-.O_ LLE � K ✓O!L 'UNS VV6gq LG Y.. rV Cq J 1 Y L E J q N° S_ O' C L 9L n. ✓LCr L•• O Y 6 Sq q C ^dam �. W .•. v u N U` n L O C q G Y• a ''J N Y O ✓� G r 00 7 w. _ O• V N NO � 60 V �n N � n2 p U VtA q C N C O `N_UL AL 6`O 2 qCq' EL GVJV> V ° S'P nN �' O ^ N V O q r ✓ V j� L L rj _ Tr pu Oqu .L E `n �' r5o c :_ on`� L c Y. m✓ °•` a o` ,q., Q..'. = `� .c °° L V w voo V r Gd�a L A o... L r n r L V u V E` V T N V 6 u AL N •°r CN V OV LV yCN.° -• `'L VGO Lea r U N NOr yV u0� ^P Nom. VN�U Lq u n9 a�yA clq �E • Em Li^ � 6 Or == N� JF BONN PNr✓� O'N •-.P VN� yI A•`°` J' � O" •„• LV L ° V� ° A q✓ C a t � P O p E L C C I •� L� P L 6 � ° V V .V+' LCP_> • l .r l] E O.00 L A ✓E tr yU � - qqG Lh .I yA ° TnCL N��O rOOL ^VNOV G,PP y0� .� ✓n• ,A ` f. V u `- C C ^+ P y° V a C O✓ 6 0 L y q V O V .I L G V •� `nAV °V � NVO YO n��� _ NGr E-`V• L �q �� Lu Pr Pu u v O Y O^ J N O VI Q N •0 0 S n^ V V E^ L trmL21 ^ O S 8 V V 4 O V Pq > OI A T V q_ NP P V `E � l' L A E � L VL 6u <O•U ttl��r 6V�0 Q e L V E V } _ GO O O E�� � �L�� VI Y. P^ E9 ^ •.. � C N r E O C P - N N V V •O N A y >•� q^ r L t�•O m2QE aV'^O� L�96 LV vN !.m a f w -e+a i E -eO � v oL� ono o a mr° V V V O E V ✓ 6 N L� V U 7 V 4 L. N ✓= L y r r GV O� VAUYY VVV V N `C O EVE VO.^ `L N �� NLV6L ' G �y VpE yqA V� W� N L r � � ^� N O V V 'C 9 T 9 •w V� LTV i Vq Aen au N n. F. q A7 �?p SNN NU G y y `CI ENL a�V7 Wes. �VN � N � EC CNN ^9G no np qG O✓ _G6 LV rnC1 2 Vp VO � u_ °� V✓ L_ V V E '.J 9 � L q A 4 y V y ^ L G V - c 4 L PSAG ^ ci'_ V u Or y� L� Vp q r•n ^r N EO° V P m N? G O�'_ LAC .�r.Lr•u L- Vp Nu- a Ec `J � NO•�3 ^ n° m O •O T u L �q u � C C6- °o.q.y C <� .Oi VW.LO VL •Ur E y G'✓ C' O `�° di WE L •.J LN m 7- B L •J' � a C V •-'E i .T.nno L •C C .'.• c u r' � L LV COC"�V -A O q OTP ^C�CO QU V 4 ALT �� N¢ Y f._ E✓ V V •l ^ u' n G L Ir O O. C 4 n �- � U •r o A o° ✓ 1 9 G L� v r c T° c d j_ m� N'1.. _c LJ .J_ -°J° _. °no�� '� �N a�"',c '^J �� om � •;.e ✓ i v c rnr o t J n `� ^ - .� C ,o = q = a ` = _ m i 0 O c� .� n �_ ` p L N = ' a � V' C' P N � O'• Y Ni LO SLr/1 L ^q O pUL ..JNa uVV �O• V�O.F uI _�� L c 0 r O c r v 0 c a M � rn C ° w• 9 9 q u v y° 9 JuLO C✓ �v 1 � 9 V l S u ✓tom a D I � V OQ_ i `1 N � e Np Q `` laO� .( UW N y- N T N Q O ✓ 4 o PV _ y 9 n u ',•' � O C u N r p C N � p19 o 9 ' c c d N QE N�QINI � N� a�n Pi. W -^ °� L 6 VfY z L i4 DV Q 6 q2 C � W K f V O N Y • ✓ ✓ E. N n C? V N 1 NT6 N.°n 1 c -°•^ L7 TV N�i✓ �TO _ y 9 �. .y✓ V 9 6 n r 1� 11 r c L c 0 r O c r v 0 c a M � rn C ° w• a � v s � N u 9 L C O O V a r r �O- a c iO i L L r O c� aa u N c` E ° c P = O J s ca -° r ` N N � T r O � Y ✓� J� L E� M� 1 9 9 q u v y° 9 JuLO C✓ �v � � ° a ✓°1 9 V l S u ✓tom a D � 1 i `1 N Np u L•'!1 laO� m N y- N T N ✓ 4 o PV _ L 9 n u ',•' � O C u N r p C N � p19 o 9 ' c c d N QE N�QINI � N� a�n Pi. W -^ °� L 6 L z L i4 DV q2 C K V V O N Y • ✓ ✓ E. N n C? V N VL`4 NT6 N.°n 1 c -°•^ L7 TV N�i✓ �TO _ y 9 �. .y✓ V 9 6 n a � v s � N u 9 L C O O V a r r �O- a c iO i L L r O c� aa u N c` E ° c P = O J s ca -° r ` N N � T r O � Y ✓� J� L E� M� 1 v y° 9 JuLO C✓ �v � � ° a ✓°1 U V l S u ✓tom a _ = y- N T N ✓ 4 Gr C _ u ',•' � O C u N r p C N � p19 o c V- d QE � N� a�n Pi. W -^ °� L 6 L •+o�-� a P L i4 DV q2 C K V V r_ 1 Y V. N O N ✓ E. N C? V N VL`4 NT6 N.°n Cv L7 TV N�i✓ �TO _ y 9 �. .y✓ N V d � ✓ ^ r c 9 T O S r d C i O O E G 9 d L. C V 2 r r C .•• L L L S L L u Y d G C✓ 9 N T u V N 9 q y T r N 9 y L V N VN D l q V a M N V P C .r y9 -G nN gULI u PND V _^ � N r K l E ' V _✓ _ v _ y a1 .•. C- O. C L. ✓ V •� V Cl rN C d l y L W- a g N L r V ° a L K L r V 9 F ✓ V O ! N O u` L ^OU a DM C O P LCO LOVC 6`aiu m PG 6r- •n - - y° C _a-. r V u 0 C K P D aJ�T Lc _ c� TLa� c °v a nu of uw- o N'+o ✓o c z'- u a- WrN LLU �i n u v c • a � v s � N u 9 L C O O V a r r �O- a c iO i L L r O c� aa u N c` E ° c P = O J s ca -° r ` N N � T r O � Y ✓� J� L E� M� 1 y° 9 JuLO C✓ �v � � ° a ✓°1 U V l S u ✓tom a _ y- N T N ✓ 4 Gr C p19 o V- d QE � a�n Pi. W -^ °� L 6 L •+o�-� a P L i4 DV q2 C Z tv - c C 9 T O V y r d C i O O E G 9 d L. C V 2 r r C .•• L L L r N 9 y L V N VN D l q V a M N V P C a1 .•. C- ✓ ✓ V •� V Cl rN l L C a q�" -I V� �p m P •n a � v s � N u 9 L C O O V a r r �O- a c iO i L L r O c� aa u N c` E ° c P = O J s ca -° r ` N N � T r O � Y ✓� J� L E� M� 1 t O� O A L V T E E II F ✓ N � — NO ✓_ � �r � rdir .i V OV r' a V L dr — c. Fwd C O ✓ —V rr. OL pV �yrO L" ✓ �¢ F O.n w Ur UC NFL L pNV n L U ✓ L O A C L �o °C1 1 ✓ a °'L v. a ✓'J d` C`a V AO C`> OI ^ � Op •y Lir — V T C � ✓ q L A A d A A L ~ L q ✓ t` a N ,J b d TO CD n L n Jo d p_N 6 —N 2 �p AI N T T o. r ° a N d• N d L V 6 V. � J J _ 0 1 N N v a � N N ✓ ^ A ✓ L L d � L 9 d� d � � A N rpir �~ = ✓ ✓ N — 2 V rr A Y O A '-� rpr � ✓ °rC d NJC =✓ AFL+ Ap� � G 7 N d � ✓V O 1 C�V �P d q0 dw�� ' d` VP W I ` a✓ ._ L p i — T O l T 'O y 7 y ...r ... OV s°r °% ^ a G� V 7 iV✓ >A �` dV C I y O✓ I A C ✓ V V T JI t .n � M .� V r` L 4� T I� =� � A Qy— C T` O I G�C� A6 J� G'� �L� r'�A I I 1 ].. 0.•� I -�4 �� p� .+� _T O �I !�� d ^C � ✓O .�i 'Y `L y� y _ `__ _ Jam' __ - ✓ V ^ t- 'J, t' ' ` 4. 6r 'Ci v � � y V I � V_ I � i _ ..r 4'+ 'VJ O7 cTn I 2� �� .._✓ ¢�N -iN � O f E E CITY OF RANCHO CiiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 83 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank J. Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -01 - CUCAMONGA UNITEL METHODIST CHURCH - The development of a 2,66 square foot Christian education building for the Cucamonga United methodist Church on 3.18 acres of land in the R -1 zone located at 7690 Archibald Avenue - APN 208 - 041 -29. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Re nested Action: The applicant is requesting approval of a Con M2nal Use Permit for the above - described project. B. Purpose: To create an educational building addition to the existing church ccmplex. C. Location: Northeast corner of Church and Archibald D. Parcel Size: 3.18 acres. E. Existing Zoning: R -1 (Single Family Residential) F. Existing Land Use: Church and educational buildings G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonina: Nor - ing a ami.y Residential, zoned P. -1 South - Single Family Residential, zoned R -2 East - Single Family Residential, zoned A -1 West - Single Family Residential, zoned R -1 !]. General Plan Desi nations: Project Site - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) North - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) West - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) ITEM G Conditional Use Permit 83 -01 Planning Commission Agenda March 9, 1983 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: Generally a flat site sloping gently to the south Exhibit "D "). The existing stone church is located at the northeast corner of Church and Archibald. In addition, an existing educational structure and various out buildings are located on the site. A large grass play field (approximately ore -half of the site) is located to the north. Curbs and gutters exist on all street frontages, with sidewalks occurring along Jadeite and Church Streets. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The new 2,700 square foot educational structure is pari of a church complex which includes an existing stone church, a 2,820 square foot educational building, parsonage, and fellowship hall (Exhibit "A"). Future additions will include a sanctuary, administration building, and extended parking area as shown on the Master Plan, Exhibit "C ". The existing parking area consists of 42 parking stalls which are designed to accommodate parking for the existing stone church. In addition, an unimproved (decomposed granite) interim parking area (approximately 34 stalls) exists adjacent to Jadeita Avenue which accommodates overflow vehicles. The new 2,700 square foot educational building and the existing 2,820 square foot educational structure will shelter approximately 90 preschool students and four staff members. This requires approximately 20 parking stalls which have been provided for within the existing church parking area. B. Design Review: The Design Review Committee suggested extensive landscaping be planted adjacent to building elevations, within setback areas, and within the expanded playground area. The landscaping is intended to soften building elevations and provide shade. In addition, the Committee recommended that street trees and landscaping be planted along Church Street and Jadeite Avenue. These recommendations have been incorporated into the conditions of approval which are listed on the attached Resolution. Lastly, the new educational structure will be designed to integrate architecturally with the existing classroom structure. E 11 E ICJ Conditional Use Permit 83 -01 Planning Commission Agenda March 9, 1983 Page 3 C. Development Review Committee: The Development Review Committee recommended ZU feet of dedication along Jadeite Avenue (30 foot right -of -way) and an additional 5 feet of dedication adjacent to Archibald Avenue (50 foot right -of -way). In addition, the Committee required additional street improvements (i.e. street lights, sidewalks) be placed contiguous to Archibald Avenue. Lastly, the Committee recommended that the southernmost drive approach be removed due to its close proximity to the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Church Street, in order to reduce auto conflicts. These comments have been incorporated into the conditions of approval which are listed on the attached Resolution. D. Environmental Review: Environmental review is not required for additions an enlargements which are 10,000 square foot in size or less. The project described above meets this criteria. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The following are the findings required to be made for approval of the Conditional Use Permit. A. The proposal is conditionally permitted and designed in accordance with the R -1 district regulations. B. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable hereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. The use will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment. In addition to the analysis above, the project is designed to be compatible with the surrounding existing and future residential area, due to the following provisions: • The project provides adequate setbacks, landscaping buffers /screens, and improvements which make it compatible with surrounding residential uses. • The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the development, and the proposed uses are in accordance with the objectives of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Conditional Use Permit 83 -01 Planning Commission Agenda March 5, 1583 Page 4 o The proposed building design and site plan, in conjunction with the conditions of approval, are consistent with the current development standards of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in ThLDaily Report newspaper and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to receive all public input on this matter. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for findings and conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution is recommended. Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "8" - Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" - Exhibit "E" - Resolution of Detailed Site Plan Illustrative Site Plan Master Site Plan Conceptual Grading Plan Elevations Approval with Conditions 0 E 0 U E ICON-a3 � eiA-•a v � --s •a _ ► - °•z . ` z * v 'a £aii3i a . rva�ada ;�-Ri � -.iuia 1 < r 2 � ...w n Fiadl X31 - S� t f3 I • I( l� zi ic In I� j- FI "� =;► i_ l .. _ _� - -� � 11.1__ 1 r _ —__�_ _ � � I ✓ V NORTH ITL %I: ` ® RANCHO CUCkNIOtiGA TITLE D? �`-, �. -� `•7: Sc_ � -,n PLANNING DIVISION L•XI HEIT: SG \LE vl I 0 _ < r 2 � ...w n Fiadl X31 - S� t f3 I • I( l� zi ic In I� j- FI "� =;► i_ l .. _ _� - -� � 11.1__ 1 r _ —__�_ _ � � I ✓ V NORTH ITL %I: ` ® RANCHO CUCkNIOtiGA TITLE D? �`-, �. -� `•7: Sc_ � -,n PLANNING DIVISION L•XI HEIT: SG \LE .sd I LL ®Iv g> Qon�l =n L Io In IA 1 ' ' Q I i I f .LS -90-1 id U t Y Ull RANNO -10 CUC k-A X PLANNING DIVISION Rw - - - -� NORTH ITEM: -_ TITLE: _ �' . •:• �� ? b� ->,., EXI iIGIT- SCALE: — i Y ®' L.® O .sd I LL ®Iv g> Qon�l =n L Io In IA 1 ' ' Q I i I f .LS -90-1 id U t Y Ull RANNO -10 CUC k-A X PLANNING DIVISION Rw - - - -� NORTH ITEM: -_ TITLE: _ �' . •:• �� ? b� ->,., EXI iIGIT- SCALE: — i :o 1 r 1r Z 1 II PI L_ I II 1_ j ,I 1 � ] I Ii � } I 4 9 f -III I ,i I� -.• Iy Z 1 YI Y 1 LL v — - _ i - CITY Or ® RANCHO CUOVN TONGA PLANNING DIVISM N7>OAM' � p�\ ? NORTH ITE.1I= TITLE- r` EXHIBIT: SGkLE° x ? t i ' 1 a� 41 I III �•' I FI i Jim I d III LI ®gyp V° �• i-_ -- -- �i p5 is Hounka - FORTH CITY OI' IT T_\ I: RANCHO CUC- ""o\GA TITLE -' ,Vv PL. \'. \I \G DI%')jiON L1I itt tT: i_ - ,� SCALE•: n 11 a L� i e a! C I� i 9 4 e O e � 2 � I INORte+ CITY OF ITEM, - ® RAaNCHO CUUV IOtGN TITLE-- PL.ANNING Dl \rnO \T L' \1 iiB? T - SG \LE- 0 RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION? APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 83 -01 FOR THE CUCAMONGA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, LOCATED AT 7590 ARCHIBALD AVENUE IN THE R -1 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 15th day was filed by the Cucamonga United described project; and of February, 1983, a complete application Methodist Church for review of the above- WHEREAS, on the 9th day of March, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, togethcT with the conditions applicable thereto, wa',I not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on March 9, 1983. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 83 -01 is approved subject to t Eec owing conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. That extensive landscaping (canopy trees, ground cover, etc.) be planted adjacent to building elevations, within setback areas, d within the expanded playground area to the sat:_.ac`.ion of the City Planner. 2. That street trees and landscaping be planted adjacent to Archibald Avenue (special boulevard streetscape standards), Church Street, and •ladeite Avenue, per city standards. "r Resolution No. Page 2 3. All laws and regulations of the State Department of Social Services relating to licensing of children's (educational) day care facilities shall be complied with prior to opening of the school. 4. Expansion of the preschool beyond 100 students will require the approval of a modified conditional use permit. �. If the operation of this school causes adverse effects upor adjacent properties, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for their consideration and possibie termination of such use. 5. Operation of the preschool :hall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bu,lding--C—ode and Title 19 of the State Fire Marshall': Regulations have been complied with. Plans shali oe submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show complian-e. ENGINEERING DIVISION 7. That the southernmost drive approach along ' rchibald Avenue (Archibald near Church Street) shall be removed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. That a Conceptual Grading Plan be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building perits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 1983. PLANNING CON!MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission Ll Resolution. No_ Page 3 11 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSM: COMMISSIONERS: r7 1 El NE z T 7 O `a O C 6 v O G 0 V g R N f r r C� V' N t6.1 6 yl A Y O A `o 0 ° a J V U Q N O O L V Uew. TQ V°_N N - Y• � O V a N°�r L` ^L q✓N TWO EC •'C.•AL 4 O d r ` A =qOJ � V V �°. V C . O � V a 'n S p p d V r •r �• � - •- � 6` Q> Y T�✓ O n^ J V C y dre uJ -.n ✓ A� 6° V O- ' -N .-✓ o Nv eq nY �'• �<E q Or m ••. c V O V V C O V ~yam _iA Y ` C6')W V ao� POd dC NL P 7 G N i °� a e G J L L. .. •^ V 6•^J •r r _ �. V � >� V q c any n.ur K d•V.•O -`° aEa O OL A V ` pp 7F ° °•Fq �Or Zi- PCC O L YO - P•- P A V - V C UnRJ ✓J r6 AON= � ° NVr GC JG Cr'y O -- N Or NG N A ✓° r �rn 1 on ''L 7d IrnL•O+ N_G G'O�A aEA j ^l^ °� °Nr -O u`nA O 6 rC C�Nty'• AA 6i °_J y ^OV Ad U' CVO `U C 6> c A Ern° Cr LI 2OC \7 1�.1. VC `_ - ? ✓°•Jn � GCA� NL C V LN- y LL- V• 0- _- °` N w aL �n °NA ^L 'J 6y •r N Vn� V7 O r _ LrLr tnr yO �� LA d ✓� 6e' u �C 4rn9 _t dam° •/rnOE G C AO�Gr V S •-i•C N N- GOB ON�6 _ � •• a N- •� P O V V yL L y r a O q `• �" T � V C tl y 'L N_ u`iLi P9p 2 �W.•G6 L'O C �' 1 Nt A dC � �O n=LE• O -L�' O V. N= L L_ G G G Lr O V r � 'n N✓^ d d N✓Q r C j i r V O V CL� °TNE A`CT PC LLL aN -OV 60 0 rOOr '.N�l °iC' LO VT d:n Cy Y ^^� v� vN a °c JQC e'•v ��u qav °�'`l �+qa — O v V u^ 4 d p 6 P P O P E- V 9 A Yo N •J L C C O U A O •J � -i' -{ rY c qqw ✓ � cc V ���c � �¢ V p> LE L Y � Y r -�' rn ��O p .....L •- � .'y. Lra o � —. C� ai 3- -NOEL °•o g TY —�. NPC ° °ni �^ - y C Y O 6 A_ y A T V r>•J o b O V CG J 7 ^ d ^•-i.� ry•✓i�0 .4 A q 4V �•-•"V GWA�O� PVL C A L 6NLG CAw•9 6G F'6N z T 7 O `a O C 6 v O G 0 V g R N f r r C� V' N t6.1 6 yl A Y O A `o 0 ° a J V U Q N O O L V Uew. TQ V°_N N - Y• � O V a N°�r L` ^L q✓N TWO EC •'C.•AL =qOJ T69 T °r 6` Q> .O VL o Nv eq nY �'• �<E q Or m ••. c V O V V C O V ~yam _iA Y ` C6')W V ao� POd dC NL 7 G N i °� a e G J L L. .. •^ V 6•^J •r r _ �. V � >� V q c any n.ur K d•V.•O -`° aEa O OL A V ` pp 7F ° °•Fq �Or Zi- PCC L �-I - P•- P A V - V C J ° N M A V- O r° •.• V° N V` -- N '� 6i A V `U C 6> c A Ern° Cr LI 2OC \7 1�.1. VC `_ - ? ✓°•Jn V •Oi• CCU C V LN- y V• 0- _- N w aL q> N N '- LYL^ 6e' _t dam° •/rnOE G C AO�Gr V S •-i•C N N- GOB ON�6 _ � •• a N- •� P O V (. R - C A O C' F_ �� r > rnC • - C V u y r a O q `• �" T � V C tl y r Nn _ _ NI�AV � �O n=LE• C' � -6 O� -O ° ^ W JC Y q L Ly O r0 aN -OV 60 0 � 11 I � U I 1 6 H� 1• N„� R m 1 CV a u G Y v >•= �- N d O_ 7 V 9 C � V G= - C^ .r V— n � ov ✓,JO �,o�> ± cac o L _ o -oc ao oiJ ,�cJc q Y d4`7 O6 1 P.Li, ^J 9M6 Vd0 qV ^G� .aV O N a o n✓ n ✓ L V r: � V ` ."� ^ _✓ Y ^ c c✓ c - L2 a. N _ u lc:. -_ rc'^ c cr° p v C N _ F ...cr= J c p` na '^ C O •' v ? Z7 L �_ u N V— ? v V� =t N✓c p t E q� _ V d ° ✓a jd�F pc.� c n ,, o° c oN ^n.J Vr,�w S n- n� d O� n n� � p C .—.• G 6 N � ' pwGaL C � O V -1 U �NV P°,VO ✓CV '-'O .r C6�N YC yN` .CVO L P p d O r = p Y S N � c 6 O T q N N q y q — O� C O�� _ i n✓ v T. v -n --p p`� o c c- `o_�.,•+c c Nno n �- °v` L p P °�� °LO... .5 .E i:oa ^� a� o° -., v N o'�OC 2_ - a✓,n aci a�'u o� OLV'r Vln"• WL OO ,Ni, ,lf= O _ C ✓ - y` Q Ow` ✓G'JNa 6 °OnJ ✓.-. ✓OP✓ U� L,rO COV ^X C _ ��.�V �•N w O tdN �1GN J O— CC 2_ yVV ] _C^JUp OCp T� CjY �_ •f vC C`f` CT92 ,On�OL ^J PN__' d VO _ ✓F_ _ lO �OV VT JNY —_C p�^ V 601 pS_ _N J.i 69M Lr G 6C tiYJ�_ -1 C Snuro ,•, avrO nS �1 Gi p W ✓ ✓ A C U V r )�� .�..0 � L G ? C � p •-f E.N. q .-^i, r°V ?„' L q � q � q •°. ` �' ; y fN,, y N � E r V O p O o C d T •+ m� O L� c v V p= q i n c ✓ y V �N> a pt nJ c c'd� V op He - NoT dLq Gci� �o -° �d lN...oT cdN .`.. N 4 L_ G� C L1 � Y p— V C ✓` O I J cNC•°o c ° GdL9 CO =_ _�4 i�u_oY c y ,r �.� Q i�H O S L d V — O C ••, ' V •' P 2 F- V r. N E D ✓ -- L 6 v -._ d 0— C U y,r PS � _J r^,n 9 _ N l„ OrN �^ q`l _10aMa OJpOp N✓ 2 > PO.G� � VY C.O � a C C �� -.= ✓ Y��O��NjY O C� p O n y 6✓ p n j n .� n. = L `. '•. c r i V L F C -• � ^] N �_ p Yom] j 9 �.= Vrg7[- L• � C �C�VC O ony >•�O CI � >n? -J• L-JV- `✓pC•7t Gi 7p V✓ r U C >..O.N t'1 �C �! r`°r LO ^+ n ,-• Y. c r < E✓ Y � � r _ `V nN 6 6 V c' , n 6 W_ 4 4 J 3 ci G_ L N L 1 CV a u M t o ✓' A S C y L j C N C y S y r O G Y L ` 0. V a Sf _ L✓ L V A v IG Y00 y O L� OYO e•• �O GO VOC � T N'.• Cw yC 2 ?�rnD LL �a O `OL ` •n =2 �J - D O D V ^ O L V• 6N a d P` V A C y 14 Y O ` L G TL NE 60N �Y C N„ L�'bL Q` j 00 V �dL uL O N N ~ C O mo d � C O p �•- L Lcio LrnP c m �' cCO my nL % ¢m uc °%' -Y..y `O G NOVGN ° VCS -T°L a JO9 uC > nf1 �I �O y. SCE >G�V ^`p0 F 8 u•+ L N•C- GV ¢ C] <O Wfr uL aYU ^qG 60.4 u1 C N Ci �•I 1•f • •p ^I NI �I I I 4 1 O O S O a�GG •e O P D O _� •� 9gCyG6 Y C i L r L` d n0 L' p 9 aN p � Ni 6 O•N V��) y LLna n d � •�O aJi � y C T O. a �^ N W V O L G .au a L J y� N9 W� VO dN O dCONMS � O N OOU �� d �dT MD iN 6 L ^VL i1 4G ^Y OD^ V ]••d OC � .0 q =� Ni °ix `Ern` ^vu__° vzd'.aL✓,c �� a.a= c.-° °v°_ _ .oqm Vm of 9 N 9 O. O V T i N G T l� 0 � G y L V G C n •- G aGr •� L ^DLV 9 O LL Y L9j �dC ^Q r.` •O O9 O.d °• LL•� �P < a L_N OL 2 VVL U O •' N V�N .0 q n^ !q 60 lC GJ CV .i C V O✓ O d N° C O 1 C A N O Y �° 2L NCP L N Cq C CY `_.L..• EL O L_ Y T 0✓N ^GV �9J _N ^ •an�YV �G C.Ci y . `��UG dN Sr YY1 VYN CnJ IY NO_ _0.0 PTO V YwfG7AV DL qL LCy � J �.� Na Lq oe o o•u,, nv� op Y ��m .E �Y .n N`u� mac- o..L3 �o `�c o N.•nJrn�dd lPy�w tv ca. d �T i ro >u ,- o- °� oa >: NE J cL t •'Lai SIN as LLMN u- vp. iN q�NOC tl O �YG• Vu .P nAE CNUO d Cd ACM n' �•6� OOp W u ^QyCGO P� NpY D dAp rJY ^yGT d O V^ N Y •� OS �� OY C q O n Od C G y U q Ca6.� OC`� Wit.- �� TLC O ��•r _N 9OT SN.°n fG.lL� GUd °7'W OC Ddd Pi GT +G N TdV U V. ✓P. _ .t ^VC LP iM0 G a -cT V^ u�A NNj aJ q n q•r CY C w N A L C O e N C N L O N ^i V^ ` N ��� ,• v •e -• c —^ O O � N N O N O M El _r 11 T LC rnV C• PL9 Liq %�27 ." ° r r _ i� ��^ q~N C N GP .0.•TC lCN C +�VI ��� L6 a A L_ 4. .. L r. 17Z L 1. O O V J V q V n .^ P - _ �� O• � 0 J C � O N iJ � r �' � - r. O✓ L ✓_ C; d ✓ O T C J L O Sc I U - .. 9 -_ ✓ k C 9 q j V✓ N U v 72 - O + J N q L d 0 C V O d d J L d O "o N c o•� ` _ T v o d L c6 a. � n.' °v ` _ � •r L a.L. .� - °" � qY.• i oo_ w a V) -.�. a N✓N ._ � V . W N V. N � c N c C' >. .Nu A O.- � 6+• n F - >- n fJ�C'„j 0. ^: U>. =.J �q N� iOq N`N O VO ..•O.y- - n. °co '.�_ oq NT •c-- -vTC L L.. `. cL N - L ✓ c d A is �. CF'I -• O c cj = nN✓ ✓V N� ,e` 1F -ON nY a G C NO•' .- L � V_ V' '� � vl yu L- 0> qr N ^ O � 9 l C Y. u.r+ N •✓j q 577 ^ P C m C q C �.• V v i ^ C T� V 9 !n O N L ^• C N _ g7 C6 NOC JO C CC L aC-. OOC -�.r �� Nq CO -P C• Y +p -CVO dY °yP� CSC C. .-q ^JP NO Tq L Ln PdgC y TWaT 20 L- uC CN •G �- +C yI C d Pte• O. .G ..• - ✓Y N d°.AV 'CV - V.n 1r - ✓� �J �ytlN _IO ^^L✓�Vl _ � L. Oq ^Y l^O .d.. PC J'r^ ^J V Vd JN - Vy.+r '_ Y qT NN �- O NY9N 4ggp G6� E +L W¢yy 60u Ornq - _U_ G� <P.v GlirO .[ q G V O d >• ql p0 N N -I C7 ✓ I \OjI V. �I �I J rn O ^L• ^� W P d P W N` O C y L •� �� rr l O J O J P - O d y y .d- G i ✓� 6 E W Q _O mY' Y n- =ooW �qN`� Vd ?i - �N = � coq i� H� 6L V - W n d� Oqq GP.q V L � 6? �` N� W q_ q q q j V N q A ✓� N O C N � V g Y d W � WHO 4°.. a� L0� 7 N= L] ' J q Y q q✓ .. �` _ V q y v d ��� c � ° °.J Lq an .N q -.' N Gam✓ fi.°.q G.� ✓ d n dD! v J V T r t°i ✓ u L' u ^�, 6 o Pu _ � A ✓ E d E g y q =`v uv- V.� n� -'• ?n.L. � yorvcn ro Lrm.°. a v - m 0.5 J y 10901 d C ✓FCJ pV -�S G.- T M W�4 -- ° J ✓ t_ r 6 LGyi C^ C A • L�Oq O LN�Cq _ _ _ P'r� PN °l�Y ✓_ { ]L l W ✓. 4 Ei V W L n J n y r N G- q W G N �. 6 V L W N V 1J V V p 6 V p G S = I V pI N { El _r 11 V ' El UI CI <I _i Y c� rI a i LI O Y Q r y O Z O Y W J \ll I I tom•_ ` V 9 l V �I`� T I O L V O✓ � _u O 9 I T .O+ O V ✓ f C O ✓ f ^ •e C P i, i v OI i u P L � � - ✓1 � c c c .� I N� ✓1'1 cco a qW 1 s s ✓.t G ° I �W r 1 v= V VO�I. L. O T.i � -� ✓ u V t✓ C 4' T. t- oL C L N �n N cc VdM if \ll C c c c C O P E P C I v c C E V _ I 4 J ` V 9 l V �I`� T I O L V O✓ � _u O 9 I T .O+ O V ✓ f C O ✓ f ^ •e C P i, i v OI i u P L � � - ✓1 � c c c .� I N� cco a qW s s ✓.t y pc rr VO�I. L. O T.i � -� ✓ u V t✓ C 4' T. t- oL C L N �n cc VdM L �✓ �� � VI P 9 vin S r � O la � J L � u C ✓ y L� ' C - ✓ v _ y d z t °✓ O J C. O V a V V q C,� � S M p q O C C F V L V y _ �✓ p C Ny �L ✓ r d L 6 C.a VVa q C'p� a �✓ Nd IL ` fq d F N ✓ H t 'WAS LC VV '^qi O •oqs G✓ T` V Qa V -- c •^o. -NYC ✓�. ° L.' o°�`o «.� �: q c c 'c c.,cc Ldd NV�7 �o ,:'TOE -� Igo qL P a duo i <n - > P �P ✓. q nL.1 c-= a `✓ V w r _ V ✓ ✓ C q v ° V N t W- O N O � O Q V 6� W✓ N L J n L j° V 9 L _ mlelgl C c c c C O P E P C I v c C E V _ I 4 J V 9 l �I`� T I O L V O✓ � _u O 9 I T .O+ O V ✓ f O ✓ f ^ •e d P i, i v OI i u P L � � - ✓1 � c c c .� I N� cco a qW s s ✓.t y pc rr oL � J cc VdM L �✓ �� � VI P 9 vin S r I � N t q t .P ✓ O v a � ro G V q C,� � S M p q O � C F V L V V �✓ p C Ny �L ✓ r d L 6 C.a VVa q C'p� a �✓ Nd ?t fq d LC °C -- _ q c c 'c c.,cc F•d. �o ,:'TOE -� Igo aV o duo i - > C -. -_ q nL.1 c-= `✓ _✓ n L _ mlelgl I I"._! way f•"d �D �' -;.. q•' u ad C u m n �. � c V V '. � ✓. T C - emu+ c c cP V\ o .�. -. L,✓ L° =c Lo = °� F oq T `- c : C_: :'q '. q iL c ✓. 4' i v. I �� N L I 'Z Z C` a rC ry _d C � N n O N Vd A m P I ✓ N C c c c C O P E P C I v c C E V _ I 4 J 0 u V Le Z72 `- - �9 N _ — TJ N v °fV] rLf d` LV y _ CE �6 O Nr DV v L « O7 OI V 6 D V OL C O N O DI s 2 d p. � A° q' P•� C l 6 C •J J C L ^ V N V •J d L 4a d D v V i r O OCN ai +M Ll 1r6 CG G_US] 2I C 1 1 22 `' CI u« VU t '� _� C L✓ L r O m N 0 0 u E 'J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 9, 1983 19 TO: Members of the Planning Co=ission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner 3Y: Frank J. Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -02 - NAZARENE CHURCH - The ceve opment of a _ square foot educational building for the Foothills Community Church of the Nazarene on 8.89 acres of land in the R -1 -8500 zone located at 9944 Highland Avenue - APN 201 - 055 -41. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Requested Action: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the above- described project. B. Purpose: To create an educational building addition to the existing church complex. C. Location: North side of highland Avenue approximately 800 feet west of Hermosa Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 8.89 acres E. Existing Zoninq: R -1 (Single Family Residential) F. Existing Land Use: Multi- purpose (church) and classrooms. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant parcel, zoned R-1-8500 South - Vacant parcel, zoned R -1 -8500 East - Single Family Residential, zoned R- 1 -850C West - Vacant parcel, zoned R -3 /PD H. General Plan Designations: Project site - Low Density Residential,(2 -4 du /ac) North - Low Density Residential, (2 -4 du./ac) South - Medium Density Residential, (4 -1 du /ac) East - Low Density Residential, (2 -4 du /ac) West - Medium Density Residential, (4 -14 du /ac) ITEM H Conditional Use Permit 83 -02 /Nazarene Church Planning Commission Agenda March 9, 1983 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The site is divided into two levels which consist of an upper section, which lies generally in the northeast corner of the site, and a lower section which is located to the northwest (Exhibit "C "). The elevation gain between levels is approximately 15 feet. The site is generally free of vegetation, consisting mainly of previously graded building pads. However, a windrow of mature Eucalyptus trees does lie adjacent to the northerly property line. Existing structures consist of a. multi - purpose building (4,988 square feet) and educational structure (4,776 square feet). Curbs, gutters, and sidewalks have not been provided along Highland Avenue. Lastly, the Alta Loma Flood Control Channel traverses the westerly perimeter of the site in a north /south fashion. J. Applicable Regulations: A Conditional Use Permit is required for church expansions for whici. a Conditional Use Permit has not been previously secured. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed 10,099 square foot classroom building is designed as part of a church complex which includes an existing 4,988 square foot multi- purpose building and a 4,776 square foot classroom structure (Exhibit "S "). A main sanctuary will be constructed in the future. The new classroom structure is designed to accommodate approximately 242 K -6 grade students, while the existing classroom accommodates a maximum of 85 preschoolers. Required parking equates to approximately 20 stalls needed for preschool facilities and an additional 10 required for the proposed classroom structure. Presently, ample parking is provided (approximately 100 stalls existing, 100 proposed) for all existing church - related activities. 8. Desi volve n Review: The Design Review Committee comments typically re around landscape issues.. The Committee recommended that additional landscaping be planted adjacent to north and east project boundaries to buffer residential uses. In addition, the Committee suggested adding landscaping (ground cover and canopy trees) within existing and proposed parking areas and along the exposed westerly slope embankment. Lastly, the Committee recommended additional street trees be planted adjacent to Highland Avenue, and that Eucalyptus trees removed from the site be replaced witn an appropriate windrow variety Eucalyptus tree. E 1.J Conditional Use Permit 83 -02 /Nazarene Church Planning Commission Agenda March 9, 1983 Page 3 While the new educational structure will be designed to integrate architecturally with existing classroom structures (Exhibit °E"), the Committee did reco, „rend that all roof- mounted mechanical equipment be eliminated. These recommendations have been incorporated into the conditions of approval which are listed on the attached Resolution. C. Development Review Committee: The Development Review Co=. ittee recommended the installation of street improvements along Highland Avenue which include curbs, gutters, pavement, sidey 'L. drive approaches, and street lights. In addition, the a toper is required to participate in the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District when formalized. Lastly, the Committee recommended that site drainage flows be controlled through the use of storm drains or other appropriate drainage techniques. D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee recommended approval ® of the project subject to: (1) acceptance of all watc-r entering the proprty from northerly properties and ;.onveying all drainage to the street; and, (2) that the P;,isting depression located at the northeast corner of the site be filled. E. Environmental Review: Part I of ',he initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the construction of the project and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III.. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The fallowing are the findings required to be made for approval of the Conditional Use Permit: A. The proposal is conditionally permitted and designed in accordance with the R -1 district reaulatiors. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable hereto, will not be detrimental to the public health. safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. L] Conditional Use Pei,mit E3 -02 /Nazarene Church Planning Commission Agenda March 9, 1433 Page 4 C. The use will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment. In addition to the analysis above, the project is designed to be compatible with the surrounding existing and future residential area, due to the following provisions: • The project provides adequate setbacks, landscape buffers /screens; and improvements Wtich make it compatible with surrounding residential uses. • The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the development, and the proposed uses are in accordance with the objectives of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. • The proposed building de -ign and site plan, in conjunction with the conditions of approval, are consistent with the current development standards of the Citv. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in -71 e Dai Report newspaper and notices were sent to property owners within 300 eet of the subject property. V. RECO10iENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and receive all pub " c input on this matter. If after such consideration tre Commission can support the facts for findings and conditions of approval, adopticn of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration is reconaended. Rpspectfu2.V submitted, Ritk City t j RG,FD /jr Attac'nents: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial Resolut :. -xw "A" - Site Utilization Map "B" - Site Plan "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan "D" - Natural Feature_ Map "E" - Illustrative Site Plan "F" - Elevations Study, Part I ion of Approval with Conditions 1 I 7j Jr++r �.e I � • 1 . � , L_I I n _ i FAT. : CruSCn • I . r I \� V� � d41< Wo � •`• SITE UTIL17 ataafsa asaa�s rs�pgar7F +»sae c � I URTI i CITY OF ® RA-NCI-10 r ��IC}�G.� TITLE: 'L-4 t! ► �� �L� r,zp PL V NING DIVISION LV HUT-_ _fit 4 w A r,2 9 ,� � �•• cl iy or RA- Ci-i0 CUC- k.N10 \C�A PLANNL \� r�IViSI4\ ITFA I: TITLE: E- MilmT: t _SC%,LE: Y NOR TTi 0 � I � \� ., l v�N, •- 1. ` \ \\ .i.OM.or.F /.lM \�\ �•I . \ \•\ � � � -rte X 'C 64 1 61-1 L A •7 O AJ<. — 0 Co NCEpTU wL G4s� '� P- A., GSORGi STOOPS ASSOCIATNS cLnvaco� -w. DwLClaa ♦.1.1.0 I.F. FOOTri�L ^ Tp'j V NORTH CITY ITEM: ® Z NEO CL C1� I0 \G. TITLE: -- A,,��, PUNNING Dj\TlsD.N EX! SGXLE= y - • R--- --y,�- L—L ice- iT 1 :lt:tt6!ltoCL�tl!��„ As � I � \� ., l v�N, •- 1. ` \ \\ .i.OM.or.F /.lM \�\ �•I . \ \•\ � � � -rte X 'C 64 1 61-1 L A •7 O AJ<. — 0 Co NCEpTU wL G4s� '� P- A., GSORGi STOOPS ASSOCIATNS cLnvaco� -w. DwLClaa ♦.1.1.0 I.F. FOOTri�L ^ Tp'j V NORTH CITY ITEM: ® Z NEO CL C1� I0 \G. TITLE: -- A,,��, PUNNING Dj\TlsD.N EX! SGXLE= II l i 4 '�°"R -��- �'I•���- i�.l�ll Iil i ill Ill�t�l 11 II iilllli -- ' ". G, lA .4 o A, c. CITY nF RANCHO CUc- mo\GA PU\, NI \G DIT%'ISIt?\T ���T12AL �cAT U(2ES M4P v� fi0l�� si0005 .Zaa �Tti �• D.s.�ai res �w : ,IORTH ITEN 4 TITLE: E. \I iIGIT: �_ SCALE: I 1 it'II':tll:trllt;iIrIt51111 11 ;il u, H 1 6.+ 1 i �J o A. M- S. L 7 �t =t 1 U� faVO4M s'rcxsss. as t OX A»11µ MbSao- NORTH CITY OF IlT;I: RANCHO C,C AlO G A TITLE - 1 °' ab-> PLANNING DR'ISION E\IIII',IT -F- SG\LE- I I 1 1 it'II':tll:trllt;iIrIt51111 11 ;il u, H 1 6.+ 1 i �J o A. M- S. L 7 �t =t 1 U� faVO4M s'rcxsss. as t OX A»11µ MbSao- NORTH CITY OF IlT;I: RANCHO C,C AlO G A TITLE - 1 °' ab-> PLANNING DR'ISION E\IIII',IT -F- SG\LE- Efz r m y 7- Z 0 Y 7 m J Ul r a ly Or NCHO CUCANIO\GA \I \G DIVISI0,N4, ITEM: 0 7 TITLE: Exiim1T: r SCkLE: o.. 'a i� 9�Z jB 0 =3 :SU o, nZ E E 0 ;n �n r E L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFZOR- %LOTION SHEET - To be cor..pleted by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: 537.00 For all projects requiring environ ^ental review, this form nust be completed and submitted to the Developr..ent Review Co=ittee through the - depart-.ent where the project application is nade. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analjsis staff will prepare Pa_ - _I of th e Izit;_as T.---- Re'oiew Cc-= iztee will meet and take action no later than ten (1C. days b=ore the public meeting at which ti=e the pro; . -.= is tc be heard. The Co.:.nittee will :rake one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- fi,-ant environmental impact and a Ne,ative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant en•.rironmental impact and an Environmental Impact epert will be prepared, or 3) An additional infor-atio: report should be supplied by the applicant giving further info ^a - tion concerning the proposed Project_ PRCJECT TITLE: Educational Buildine APPLICANT'S N:,.^^.E, ADDRESS, Foothill Co-munities Church of the Nazarene NA-ME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Paul 3. •:eal 17' <b r n- r',1nr-'3 Ca 91736 982 -7856 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 9944 Highland Avenue, Alta Loma, Ca 91701 ?0'-051 1 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: _ I -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Approsicately 10,000 square feet build ^.F to bg iv;Pri fnr S+!n�ov Sr,,-,,, ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOT- £ OF 7XIS 7 -NG AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, I£ APIY: Ten acres, 10,000 Gq_ ft_ of existin b'uildinvs anA in nnn _t ___ - ^_s. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOR+SATIOti ON TOPC APT , PL _ITS (TP�ESr , il7!-MALS, A-NY CULTURAL, HISTOR =C_S OR S:: _:;IC ASPECTS, LSE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, ANA T -E DESCnIPTION OF A \': EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR .__E ;ATTnC NECESSARY SHEETS): we tel fnrmer Santa Fe Right of ?dav to the Church for kroner, =v is cleedinf., this ��nansion. R;nhr about 25 E11c,41�.'ptIlS trPPC �f rav bas of t•h line where we he b+ ldina °_pace. 17 South of the north propert -- l "ne_ nn +?7 rues lai. ;,% f will be hnilt- *M. where _- - - n„- nazi -im- and fi n r -_- line channel and vacant fields (west). to animals nr c,.ir rat. or h=.srnr cal or scenic aspects on this property_ 3 Is the project part of a larger project, one of a aeries Of cua;alativ'e actions, which althouah individually _:gall, say as a whole have significant environr..ental impact: 1-2 J WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO t 1. Create a substantial change in ground _ contours? X 1. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? x 3. Create a substantial chance in de-iand for _ municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? x 5. Remove any existing trees: How manv? 25 _ x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fla=mables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: T? a 25 trees are on the _property line and Fire Truck lane. Of the new project, approximate y 5 trees have blo.,n down in the rccent wind stn —.s .:nd p avinc children '.:ve set fire to a few trees this past •.car. IMPORTANT: I£ 1.he project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby cer*_ifv that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of rmu knowledge and belief. I furthez understand that additional information may be reouired to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date 1/11/83 Signature Title Bhildir.^ Cor.�aittee. Chairman 1-3 ® SIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the Cit^ of Rancho cucanor Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the a!:;iliz: of the school ga district to accommoda te the proposed residential d�-velcp-ent_ Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: PHASE I PHASE Z P _:5 3 Pc'S= I TOTAL i. Dumber of single fanily units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin cer_struction: 4. Earliest date of occnparr_v Model 4 and Q of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Rance 1-4 11 G 0 RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 33 -02 FOR THE FOOTHILLS COMMUNITY CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE, LOCATED AT 9944 HIGHLAND AVENUE IN THE R -1 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 15th day of February, 1983, a complete application was filed by The Foothills Community Church of the Nazarene for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 9th day of March, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on March 9, 1383. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit iio. 83 -02 is approved subject to the fo owing conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Dense landscaping shall be planted adjacent to north and east property boundaries. 2. Additional landscaping (ground cover, car,o;y trees, etc.) shall be placed within proposed parkiia areas and along the exciting slope embankment, which lies adjacent to the new perimeter road. 3. Trees removed from the northern property line shall be replaced with an appropriate windrow variety Eucalyptus tree, per ci +y standards. Page 2 4. All laws and regulations of th2 State Department of Social Services relating to licensing of child,-en's (educational) day care facilities shall be complied with prior to opening of the school. 5. If the operation of this school cases adverse effects upon adjacent properties, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for their consideration and possible termination of such uses. 6. Operation of the school shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and Title 19 of the State Fire Marshall's Regulations ha•.e been complied with. Plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Suilding and Safety Division to show compliance. 7. The applicant shall )articipate in the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District when it is formulated. A letter of intention to join the Assessment District shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. S. The applicant shall accept all water entering the site from the north and convey all drainage to the street (Highland). 9. The applicant shall be required to fill an existing depression located at the northeast corner of the site. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of t e P tinning Consnission n U 0 Resolution No. Pace 3 0 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Co:mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetin, of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CO!YiSSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I] 11 V ^d•r dam° r dC 6F wTa O^ `J<_�s••J a•e _].Ln A°_V ✓V A N _O �V O `_lV tOu c io u .—..p L N ° = ° N L _ ^ y c •J ° G r q A F i i N G C � � y ° o T .T. � _J � �� L _ ✓_ v E1 N G O ✓ 1] a q � n � A ._ c- __ ✓ Vag - p° _ _ v p ••� -° icy_ a_ J✓ � V V _ 7 C —_ L _ N ° _i t_ V rn� NG ✓ O✓ 5 = V AS .y. i '2_J NO _ VA ViA -JO '_ r°• Aj! �0.. OL•n C G fP =� - o.c`nr p• ✓i " ° =�, N? G= __,.? a_r _ v � = c i n� c — J q ` � O C L✓ "..]G = _ C A° A L A j A G i� S_ w w C C A u G °^ ` uc a' N- ✓_ o '^^ r✓ pE ✓.o cN s OL H�aL_ CS r 6T °° O° 7PV _ VLJ a�_C N ✓qL' c: v O Tan E E N O <ys A i a0. r q C °— ` i \°. f n T N L% c V l✓ Q 7 w Tr c Ya qN �< S wy q0 wE °u0 .^ d u °N `u°i °° q ✓d__Dw O. O"� ^ � €G P °• L a Q _P c y V Sa q J a V^ 'J C O 1 0 A^ P ✓V° �a.N+ t y • —� _ — •Ln0 tON V i A� ..°V O� =+ ^V s C iGy VO_�G dC° ° 7 isC. 0...— Lc�JN a. at NNpar _ o ._✓A o i a cm. 2 ia`ou m au <N. ¢a o.N -wn .- =N° •nA <+ �a�'+'c°''o' o < J1 a0 m pa r r �• CJ .t.. 4.• ° q A N U Q V� — C � I � r d— rAU DV �LG P•- (F- LyV ^ V q O d —•r N is r a -d N rP ��N �oC ° ✓�°.s AinN �° SI d A= °� C l ya L O d as• A C O a N I II _ a0.. d E y ,°acs 4vc -- 7 O1 .V.•L J Q J 1 i N �_. _ L d✓ 7 0 i P N N G q aj i5 2 A Te °� Lc mac Sow °C =�� °•��a i'<+ -.Ni• Q ^� )I � y ^ >•Ni•v U. —_..9 ✓N� .6 °9 NueY �Oip`y cT\cv lyw v c a^N ao oti�o. \t �•� � ` aO•a Y rn c -vim i - q° •+ u - o- - E C u•—`r ^ 9 P `�{JI (' +I 1 J �Oa~ �uG ✓CO•"• rI _C °G =VNAd iw._ - °_ -I v4i n oI �p c`a°.:. ¢- •• =oa�i <000 .�• S O \C 6 0 1 C•. J i 11 1 N El °Lryuw 9cC =G qC0 _. is O U` ENE OV V�b r n -O.L.. ZVnV'Vr V�Ci YV� -_ T a _ q y •J T� V y V n~ q G f- _ r � 0 C^ d L ' _ _ °° N � c y b •' _ n n d L _ o n _ � M- na y Y ^ L •� n� °? y . C q O L _ 'Z .� _ L Z O O � n '> _ CMyZVN° ^LCL q-J LLF 9V G•� 2y J�9 JdCgVO 0 d n a .0 LOL �° ^ i06y�N O y OPy qr OL =VV Tl avrO QII11II 00� ^OM2j P 9L V E LO ^+ C N r _ s Nz ` I O 57. o0 72 C �i�r ycJr � q r°i V O _LOd DNEr yV 90�� a G ' ` ^i V L P O_ C �.� 'yn 177 O fV..l °L ISO. �O .L+N9CJ Vu C ?= � J 0 V 6 O Z � •� ^ EO L 9 M N q � M d N C 4 r =' P VO.9 ^� o EO`_� o o•. `� qND� UC- -Op Y�VC��N F .L VJ Gr trL�C. yVy" 'm o '!.o E6 °_d G y G� � J G _ y >'r _ _J V E L r L _ � ^ •' q G. C N i O �- 1° _ G '� ^ Z V C • O C n � v C q _ C� n O V N C C O on_ tL '� ^ „'i .� C r 4 U ✓t C� „� u ` 11 1 N El O G Ll E - Of~P V i G O •'. V r '� V I r C S L I �' N C O C O W U N ..• y -. r q D V r 9 ..• i I 9 r L .. ` U .. E C ,O, � _ E6 N _ I LV I✓ f`OT NV r V O N Or� Pu„O =O G_Dq � -JJ L L �'• G C _ I~ C P' 7 N � n A N O ✓ N� A d ai L � r° d . A V O ).'•r O � C r O •.. L� O C P � •-.• N „ ~ � o O d N C' j C `� u C I - S u- q �J q a ✓ A 9^ N 6 v V i l n L u` oau avrn ^qe O yz °� z e �� a '° �cd i G� u v L I Nau V =Ay �� r L .. q N Q N _• N W Y S Y q✓ A v= O•^ £ E O � C I V^ U N^ 2 O q V ` 9 O Y g L C� C _ M V ..n. .- . •_n ` ^r P A uuLU SL V•• � C^ CEtO nqV •.+ 60 VO `I �� a — °— i `ai = oa°s < i a.°, r. cW`6 =.°o E 2 •+ u ❑ti c �A tam Ot 60� ✓I N vl N �O II I ! 6I I ! OI 1 � I NI O ^ 4 1 bwrti Pl •L �. �a l G A r R V A� - qL C• N P6n C 9 V N✓ L ^ C � L� D d 9 V a � N � 7 V D q r• O ->, L N G P w V^ O � n O C _ g L d� d u O V v V 7 •Lid ... l a g N A q �_ O V d_.. u0 6 L � iL i OY L ^Y C qD._ � 6 ^✓ D N ✓ P ° L d t _ '. C C C r 6 O rJ V O iioY O o sP niga [m 2 acy y✓?NN ii Y s C —L� .n .J G ✓SVtL d_ ^_l rd Ti^ ^ - q j V ✓� V Q N O C V 6 ^• d C O N V L 6 L C ^ A a A �'� ` 7 i q O A • T u �7 y O �. i0 C y � � l 7Y W N O•L L, D > Pu V_V ^�00 L� O v w.q LV^ �O 09 nCVj C` ZY Cd?N m q V V 7Z EL Jug r ^ T mow- ✓9 PiO °W'JV c d_ ✓ PVO C 9N n V V•LN ��= _ O` U o L O -� q s E r Gv r N c _� 6 c uyyEE n c SGT _ � N r O• o 9 N C'CT N ID G6 LPA`V LC C� OT GN Vq C^ � +�r ✓n x L ? V c>3 c V T i o c ry :�• '^ N A^ r •V,•'v ... q v v ''' v m ?' nL ° e .T� y u S C C-. .r ✓ � d� � b ° O L C O � C L U u V O� � 11 C O �_ �� C A� G 9 u n O -• G >� M C O � d 9 A V` a P � °� IG N S 9✓ O ^ TL �. n 9 P A ^� 9 C •'s L. L C •"• ` u a ° ]•. ^ — u .._ o "' L. 'c e. n�� nA� N ` va O �L cL• v� � •ce°Tz N q.. S.• � °4. 'f� Ll^ VE PA'A jO. S d d n iC O CJ d V - N T^ p T ^>' O _ •n u� Abq �NL CS NONNN Nd >6C - r_CV iJ Lt GN u_✓ ��! .,4�n N ^MA` <N� <j <N SV�dW GAC OS GV �t]r �NL NN9 2•�ni 6^ JLEC R 0 T a A On! am c• •• nLV YaT LoY - Q F q C O Q L O r A P^ J O B y V q y q� .�.. g n N o O gp GO q6 N TQr O� Gi qr _ Oq LGO d iOt _Vn y�N'U v >V r C OJ r C M L a � GN " .r` G q VCm� yi ? V( _ V C O L] Ov p q q LYL V Dc O �L v V9Y � v d d N O V N � L V N H �• _C -NOS rY aq qc'O L Emu_ .Ai.i� „i�ys i�c G r t• P C tit W d rY __ p V d p U r L L L P �� ^ O d d q S O r r�V EO.��— = pL�ro_= 6V Lv✓ LTV `L^ 6°Y 'c �� 7 0^ C ° T G .J J J r � L• q u •O � n O F O c O � _ q L u � I n u- T W q V. � � •- C C N r d .p y Gr O• v C q V r G Y 4 q 6� fFl �_ O � • — d b V N � ^ �' d U� G G ✓ =0 � V= 7d V q N C� V T P� V ^ iN cd.._ ^ome co nL qOq� buO ° °oL `vow "c — c' Lcaa vav ° N.2` C 9 ° V q�n No E dp 0 O rT '^� •LN V C y y b a ^✓ C �� —� d —•CAN N�nc =E� r PoY NVCtn Gnoa 00.E ^i. ¢oViVO rN � ea n f�cCL C+q ♦i�cs 1 4� �I L� T� �t =; 7 yl q U•I xl O) WI -� L P VE L > L C p V ur ci r c _ o q G O N 6 E A O r r V v V n4 V ro L E N V V N q N v G C O q � T V = O O O u ^ E L T? C A O C C V qE C Y C 0 y C N^ 9 N L O gp GO q6 N TQr O� Gi .W £ d c A — ,n r C OJ r C M L a � GN " .r` G q VCm� yi ? V( O� OI V C O L] Ov p q q LYL V Dc 4� �I L� T� �t =; 7 yl q U•I xl O) WI -� L P VE L > L C p V ur ci r c _ o q G O N 6 E A O r r V v V n4 V ro L E N V V N q N v G C O q � T V = O O O u .W £ Y6 4C yWOU � GN " .r` G Ud� N L n L V C O L] Ov p q q LYL V Dc O �L v V9Y � v d d N O V N � L V N H �• _C G r t• P C tit W d rY __ ^ O d d q S O O• a - p' 6°Y 'c �� 7 0^ C ° T G .J J J r � L• q u •O � n O F O c O � _ q L u � I n u- T W " 6 n � •- C o` a O ' G ✓ =0 � V= 7d V q N C� V T P� V O rT '^� •LN U OmN C �� ♦i�cs �,? N c ✓ c A ? L ro I I i I i J o� �_ v,oa ✓ nr No✓ _ C ✓° � O - Vu I I nNO i,-a V K C I I AW _P A Vu _ ✓ O N.". 6'J L ✓T Tn.`.�T N V Ov TZ I �wW Y^ TV .nj ^ ^� = ✓c Wr � I ^VO C O u ^ V I CarW `E J O'O N J d ✓^J d T I `e ^Vr aN CVLI n N P9LOV LV �6 I q r_n ✓ u_ rC A N� Q CCY A V V ' _TN✓ 9 C1Q I t L n`o 6V 9Y O V T Y) ` a CIJ I� V V T L N A �✓ � O a q NS ✓ W VO OV�Y �O .�' 9 dyV D N �Y ✓V iCN DWEG a. AD `�� � I I� i ✓ ^A� t.. Try l 4� S �' Y'S. ^ J ✓ e e P_ VAAP N. M y61P �LVd V�'O VP �� ri �N cr O DW ygiT u W r ✓La++ N - C u «d L 6 J V✓ �r ` � C f = t=J GJ ^ O. C N h N `. L V 9 C a 36 O VV I I I V yL},} .`+ N NgWU O OuC GV W✓ N y 6r U r LO 9 q V O V 0 r°i d ✓ ai= �� aC = I N •_ C q�. N L N � S. � � N N A 9 J V C L d V n J O A C O 6 S a i'y N O y 6 L P d � N C C I I '� C 4 6 A� y ^ '^• �_ d o C t F f V � 96' O V ) N c V � ✓ L OCO �6L'V r J9 L `OV N� f9 � N � V O p f d L ✓ ` O ^= J V N Y O 6 L I 9_ y` E ✓YU_ = NEb DIG r�C T O -ca N I L ,elc � y � ud cc =c t d-oiL ,e Niy ✓ic "'„ Go'L �i 6l V� p� I I I VV 6�a � 6�6u 6VY 6S WS vCet� NI ^� NI ^I •I d N� � � � i NI t J', •_ yk tJ LJ I 0 p c u ° -T• a 52= a O• C aV N n O L v NG ^J c °✓ m u✓ q o �i••� c E a OLE N a � oo a i u Flop ° O„ OGar p ✓ � ✓ v � `� N — C o` c n CL•pd ✓_q CN L q Vx of L .2 °aViv u I� d C N°Y N V n r`.✓ 2✓ Etw� a w'.— w I I~ `•vvi acaFVi w _ a.m d — yci Q A „c 9J Cv LC N L'�y u pq yqL✓ v v O ua E y r T ��✓ in jt OT 6VC V VY r C = V > d✓ C V L O L V d d L VV� 6C� �I CO nv �yjy p— N Q— va yr 6 V v Q p 6 J V Ll M u N � oc I ` N 9 ✓ L c ` b \`I ~I N t1I J ° I r d vI V V Q. 0 d V l c d I 7A 1�t:J e 0 L v c m u✓ q o �i••� c a � oo a i u Flop ° n CL•pd ✓_q CN q Vx J L .2 °aViv u I� o mc� 2✓ Etw� a w'.— w I I~ 0 q N� N V �_ N W � p M u N � I ♦ ` N 9 ✓ L C— V J ° I✓ r d u V V Q. 0 d V l c d I t� l L� L ��° 6. ° 6 y 3] O L L L q p V ✓ d c _ p E 2.t Z N O I � V V l U L N T O 2�� O y — L � � 'o C C —0 ✓ ✓ O I 7 6...a O✓ d° L d � _ � I ° L � L an � �_ C v0 F N w.l 2 .a w O 'w '' V ? W •CV F � O G `: 1 °✓ o u d d O• i n ✓O C� ua ^�U I. C`n G i 117 C Z� NN JV '� 1 p S p O ._ O ✓- ley 6. G F n V V _ TI �° I �W_. Q4N IN 1 =V > wNJL e. _.�,. L^• —C = o 7A 1�t:J e 0 U 11 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 9, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -03 - BA;.TON - The development of an 30,000 square foot office building on 13.22 acres of lane in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 7), located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 208- 351 -19. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site plan and architectural design, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Puroose: Construction of an 80,000 square foot office bui'ding consisting of four stories. C. Location: The southeast corner of Focthi ?1 Boulevard and Haven Avenue D. Parcel Size: 13.22 acres E. rxistin Zonin Industrial Area Spec'fic Plan, Industrial Park cate9cry�Subarea 7) F. Existing Land Use: Vacant �. Surroundino Land Use and Zonino: North - Abandoned Virginia Dare Winery, Zoned A -1 Vacant land within the Terra Vista Planned Community, Zoned A -1 South - Future site of County Court House, currently vacant, Subarea 7 East - Vacant, Subarea 7 West - Vacant, Zoned M -R (Restricted Manufacturing) .ITEM I OR 33 -03 /Barton Planning Commission Agenda March 9, 1933 Page 2 H. General IF n - South - East lr'est Plan Designations: o1mnerc I al Industrial Park Industrial Park Off ice I. Site Characteristics: Slopes uniformly to the south at approximately 2.2 percent, no structures, no trees or signis`icant vegetation. II. ANALYSIS: A. Gensral: The proposed building would be the first example of a ; nodern multi -story office building in Rancho Cucamonga. The four -story structure totals 50,000 square feet in size and will feature a modern architectural design with a white concr!,t;, reflective glass, and metal exterior. The building is the first phase of a master - planned project which inc7,Adns four office buildings totaling 400,000 square feet and a tour -story parking structure (Exhibit °E °). he buildino a* the east end of the site will be identical to the building proposed •:ith this application. Two larger buildings will occupy the -:enter of the site and the parking structure 1,:11 be located along the south property line. As indicated on the detailed site flan, the southern portions of the parking lot are located where future buildings will be constructed. When the master - planted project is complete, 80 percent of the required parking, approximately 1300 stalls, will be provided in the parking str -ture. 3. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee recommen ee appr� c1' the proposed building and master plan. However, the Committee did express a desire to review the layout of the plazas located in front of and behind the building. Considering the 'idghly visible location of the project, the Committee felt that special design emphasis should be placed on the street facing plaza and landscaping. To assure that the Committee's concerns will be satisfied, the applicant agreed to a condition which allows review and approval of the plaza design and final landscape plans by the Design i:eview Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. C. Development Review Committee: The Development Review Committee reviewed the project and determined that with the recommended conditions of approval,the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. The Foothill DR 83 -03 /Barton Planning Commission Agenda March 9, 1983 Page 3 Fire Protection District will require an emergency sire lane around the front of the building. The road is necessary tc allow access for an aerial ladder truck. The applicant has expressed a desire to use the lane as an automobile circulation aisle. Although the building is set back 65 feet from. both Foothill and Haven, the lane could have an adverse visual impact on the project, and it is recommended that access be limited to pedestrians and emergency vehicles only. A condition of approval is provided for your consideration which requires special landscaping and design features such as mounding, street furniture, and `.exturized pavement to incorporate the access lane as a design feature of the streetscape and proposed plazas. Final details will be approved by the Design Review Committee with the plaza design. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has bee* completed by the applicant. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. Development of the project will generate additional traffic and increase the amount of water runoff from the property. However, these increases are not viewed as significant adverse impacts as the surrounding streets and flood control Facilities have adequate ca.acities to handle the projected increases. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The following ar-A the findings required t^ be made for approval of this project: A. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives and purposes of the Industrial Area Specific .tan and Zoning Ordinance. B. lire proposed u:,e, together with the conditions applicable h=reto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the proposed use is in compliance with each applicable provision of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance. D. That the project is consistent with the General Plan and Daon /Barton Master Plan. 0 DR 83 -03 /Barton Planning Commission Agenda March 9, 1983 Page 4 This project is consistent wit., the industloei P,rea Specific Plan, the General Plan, and the Daon /Barton Maser Plan. The project will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. in addition, the proposed use, building design, and site plan together with the recommended conditions of approval is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the industrial Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Iv. CORRESPONDENCE' This item has been advertised for environmental review in T e Daily Report newspaper. V. REC.,N"IMENDATION: It is recommended that consider all input ani elements of this consideration the COmmission can support adoption of the attached Resolution would Relpectfully sub-Mitted, Rick dmez., City Planner r RG /CJ /jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" - Exhibit "E" - Exhibit "F" - Exhibit "G" - Resolution of the Planning CC.-Mission project. If after such the facts for findings, be appropriate. -- ;,king /Location Mao General Pian Detailed Site Plan Building Elevations Conceptual Master Plan Conceptual Grading Plan Daon /Bartor� Master Plan Apwroval with Conditions E e I l�i 9-z, /?o f :J L E ♦ �; 7 1. R I� R -3 l 11 A-1 �I ! CITY OF ITF_M: RAINCHO CLCANIONGA TITLE: �cal,�� tcz�cn�ti ratan PLANNING DIVNON EXHIBIT _ — SCALE_ 1i-T -S. C � NORTH H IT J M -R S �, i i G R- I 16 $( - itT2:- ^lJ� CITY OF ITF_M: RAINCHO CLCANIONGA TITLE: �cal,�� tcz�cn�ti ratan PLANNING DIVNON EXHIBIT _ — SCALE_ 1i-T -S. C � NORTH H RESIDENTIAL F ---J VERY LOW <2 DU's /AC L LOW 2 -4 Du's,Ar. C� LOW - MEDIUM 4- 8DU'siAC "Z-01 4 -14 DU's /AC = MEDIUWHIGH 14 -24 DU's /AC m= HIGH 24 -30 DU's /AC © MASTER PLAN REQUIRED COMMERCIAL/OFFICE =0 COMMERCIAL L COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL '--*I NEIGHBORHOOD .�OMK Mm REGIONAL COMMERCIAL WM OFFICE CITY OF RANCHO CI O CUCAj10\GA FLA:VNI\'G DIVLSi0,1 INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK GENERAL INDUSTRIAL GENERAL INDUSTRIAL/ RAIL SERVED 00 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL OPEN SPACE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL —� OPEN SPACE FLOOD CONTROL/ UTILITY CORK ® SP =CIAL BOULEVARD NORTH ITEM: Z�F, 83 -o-2; _2 -,*A TITLE r..o -�me. `tr �.J E- XHII3iT= "iF, ' _ SCALE: 0 0 E J I i i i 1� Li 1 ' i I I � FIfZE �..5 L�lnlE /J t \ It 1 I. ICI hI l "PCIA=ti I I� III �IJ -1i� • -.� L \� C= OF RANCHO t� CUCixN10N'GA PL4LNNING BIRrb9QN ITE \1: 87, -'r 3 =�,T� "3Tl-s : -cAe -rte Fn --sr-: p►�a c EXT-ITMT: '� " _ SCALE = --r-° C � NORTH a t' ,T ♦ � „ -ter... 1 � _� \� CUCixN10N'GA PL4LNNING BIRrb9QN ITE \1: 87, -'r 3 =�,T� "3Tl-s : -cAe -rte Fn --sr-: p►�a c EXT-ITMT: '� " _ SCALE = --r-° C � NORTH a :J -f �■... �� �� 4. � 1S � �� II�■i�� ■' - ,v ■■ ■� ate.- ,� �r��■ i■. - or +.r■u ■ ■c .r � �� � -,.... R \! t``_t'i: IIL'.2�(!� II/ bl��tI471i�111r11 ■D�ll'ji_Idl;. . ' .� OM �� ����• �� ��lw��t �! � � ulllgflln IIII {f Kyl�rlitllHtilllllt/lll ultluflant4l c-r..t IRR■UttlWlO■lll � r f CITY RANCHO -aa- . • i r rr Lr I :rj r CITY OF RAN! -CHO CUCAjmO. GA PLANNING DIVNON -7 I E , rill ' I I ITEM= 5- X83 -oZ - -SaK� -oti! _ EXHIBIT- "Fri SCALE: = NORTH n U T STATIS7nCAL SUMMARY LANG USE ACA -. - POOR P4PoC TA COW PROFF_SS)ONAL� OFFICES as 26L PgL*l SS+oNALOFFICES CORPORATE PLAZA T$3 PROFESSKX*4L OFFICES 4S1 PROFESS ONAL OFFICM I.ICJIT IN[%bTRIAL 406 — S1HT_IIiAL 1G`1.D UrEXISiTR1AL LiGw IFQfiTRLAL 722 METMUM INLIIJST Tai IY -�— _ :Dm-TOTN OPEN SPACE _',__0— NDSCAPE BUFFER 168 S (N7TN FOW) 4a6 TOTAL 1 •O— I FOOD PROFESSIONALOFFICES - OFFICE SIOMAL FOOD tt�� OFFICES OFFICES R�wc PARK v . LoGkn 1 wDLbiTeAL 1 - PR �ONAi. OMWORAIE PLAZA `. LKxi,eL LAIN p�tb"TTaAL 's I I ) 5E L1GNT 1 �PPra� rt+DL,STTLAI 1 a QJCT101SA1AL lti(i NDOSTFiLIL --- -- '--------— 1 1 , RANCHO CUCAWWGA WSINESS PARK also ian , A DAONIBARTON DEVEIOPNIEMP CI'T'Y Or' R ,CHO CUCA2VIO \'C A ITEM: AI PLANNING DIVISION TITLE= rt..1 esTOPI +Rps ;o-� ,e ) EXHIBIT: G _ SCALE -N. w -. N1° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the Project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part I3. of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Barton Plaza APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: James E. Barton 8409 Utica Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91-730 (714) 9a, -0796 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: James E. Barton 8409 Utica Ave. Rancho Cucamonaa CA 917';0 (714) 987-0996 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Southeast corner of Foothill and Haven, Parcel 1 of Pa +'nl V. 6715 LIST OTHER P.ERIdITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Buildira permit, Cit•: of Rancho Cucamonaa I -1 E. u E 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION? DESCRIPTION OF PRWECTT': 2, 4 story 80,000 S.F. 6 story 120,000 S_F. structure_ ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Land is equal to 13.22 acres, which is eaual t2 S_� feet. e existing building, proposed structure r. to scuare feet. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACIi NECESSARY SHEETS): Existing land - vacan cultural or Historical I o an t-, Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? This Droiect is Dart of a 300 acre master plan develDnmo reviously aDDroved by t 1-2 City of Rancho C WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO --- XX 1- Create a substantial change in ground contours? — XX 2. Create a substantial chance in noise Or ? vib_zticn. Xs 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services sewage, etc.)? (police, fire, water, XX 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? — XX 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? vy 6. Create the need for use or disposal of Potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next- page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this to the best of ability, initial evaluation information Presented and that the facts, statements, and nted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Data.3,,r:u,ry 21 20-- Signature Title �"ner 0 1-3 ® RESOLUTION NC_ * A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CO'MMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 83 -03, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN AVENUE IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK CATEGORY (SUBAREA 7) WHEREAS, on the 21st day of January, 1983, a complete application was filed by James Barton for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 9th day of March, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meetina to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the District in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance; and 4. 'hat the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. io SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a legative Declaration is issued on March 9, 1983. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 83 -03 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The final plaza design, both in front of and behind the subject building shall be submitted for review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. A detailed plan shall be provided and must indicate construction material, finished textures, lighting, and landscape treatment. Resolutin No. Page 2 U The emergency fire lane shall be incorporated into the streetscape and plaza design with the use of special landscaping and design features such as mounding, street furniture, and texturized pavement. Final details shall be submitted for review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The fire access lane shall be reduced in width to 121, except at specific locations designated by the Fire District where 16' of pavement is necessary for parking of an aerial ladder truck. 4. The drive approaches on Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue shall be provided with texturized pavement. ENGINEERING DIVISION 5. The two -way drive Alder Avenue shall City Standards at Boulevard the exit be reduced to 15' i approaches on Haven Avenue and be designed in accordance with a width of 35'. On Foothill lane of the drive approach shall n width. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 1983- PLANNING COMMISSION OF T'HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretavy of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 0 V J u V 0 r L. . L w 0 T u c N G 2 OV O - 4 VL JT J 4� ad �iU •! a°na0 >00 Va PO N Na✓ v ✓o °w _c c _ora wL^' n- Nv i�°ne t L n�c -.°ec �i °cw van �ru �v dSF Or� >9 �C- �NSV o0 � yN8 yr y�q y. o�eE boo c <p fTy C d V d U Pc Qr O L 77 -- N?v v/WO La 4 =CO iON 09 ✓-° CY-J O.rniA .n^ W L N o V ✓£ L -.- C O C t � c NOC'i -6N0 � pOL_. F O WA <= C•' -�Y > d 9 V C V' CnV W « O✓ .., � n r O N Y - ✓ 4 w p Lp L N °crn a c W c ?c✓ o$_ vT `- .J wN^' ✓ No .q. �4 :.>'o�c 6_ C = 0` S C N v� 'C N A _N W ` te N� W C t L ✓ V G P- V N O t W t> C a �- .� ?- y M U N Q N d O- .• O° '� ✓ F q Nj � V A N„ P W N - 6 d L tf L L O LL J iWC L7 �C N q_n NCU « nom• ✓fin N- 9 N -_ -✓ d- W C d w__ p = V n>•nr0 On< V j l 1 O N L C ✓ r C L✓ G« N t N Y£ O «� 9 Y d O d q L � O T� V� N� `- iO « W a L p c n� L N nO t; ✓ C d 9 ° 4 W� C p D V S d C n C° U d y« Y•1- N LL a = n q O r G' O C W � N • a W O N V✓ g a n "isn �eu.N.. cc CLO =q CG. � °' °> ihvc ccOL c p - y VygC p O rJ ObV ° ALL �_VMCW� U�V d�r Up NCO V ^ L VN al n.VG -O u � agL.cn 6Nna ¢AVm 4� rnN �N4 rt Hp vfnq ZZ J•L+ 4�q.=... p� O c m 0 V J u V 0 r L. . I L w 0 T u c N G 2 OV O - 4 VL JT J 4� ad �iU •! a°na0 >00 Va PO N Na✓ v ✓o °w _c c _ora wL^' n- Nv i�°ne t n�c -.°ec dSF Or� >9 �C- �NSV 9r � yN8 yr y�q y. o�eE boo c <p fTy Pc Qr 4 =CO iON JE(p� ✓-° CY-J O.rniA Fwd W L N o V ✓£ L -.- C O C t � c - p Lp L C O p r ° Cam: Da« 6 Q OGO G- ql nF N -t nO t; ✓ C d Y V Y � i uC WN Y ^ V � ✓ � C1 ✓n ^6' N oc ftV- J CLO =q CG. TCVU Cqu C 1 u � V= J N t7 � • � c m I M v w aoaNe q s ^mss a� NmL p _ay P.,L a. uow w�> qo.q o� m o- E W a u PO -° cL�•.° 9 r? q= y y C q O l 0 rP -ie c q e" `L q_ d CLgrFpprFp 4•yua rLir V WL l'^ l Ear °y TEy ° Ny0A9� v N'9 a s °• � 4 AcYV�� 1 �C eQ Y JNP° V. C_y O NNyP v W A L « d4 � _ L A.- ^'�Np � � W CLLt 9 °VT Z C O • c O C a a.L.r T .-ro •'� VLV LVT LCN « r> E`�WCU N WL NO NO ar N l] �arL d V�P� E 'w V q.ai.UO PV ^.•.� q'� C v UL- °•� rn4� An' C Vrm ^O ayes n Ca I�_'�•u° 'n cN - a u�TO L ygOa ac LP A a A_LX O 1 x�c�,v � as -.• a « P L:5 _ L Y P.0 N y L „r r�Crr� r`.aLy P- NlP` COC _ N A_° •Lrr 0 Z 'e0 L NSW ^GCNL u O"N' rm �Lr u lC > n_ A1iU CYV. 00 qi C^ Ja]•`u « t0 L� y _ U [' � If ! m0-J LV�NWA ° •L' a -_ •J' u J N °c - oc�aya ^'N'.N.x f° Gt_ a ,u°,.'° `_e nr`nv �� a.°_o =Wa° ~ =•� et Aa��•�E V ^ire Nyc A ^° N °e ° qi °v L '� _« dN_nra icJ G° N ° ' �a � fr., Z O O V y O L 9 L C J P ° O� °N« °av re yq c �y d •°.r r c q 7: C^ V4 n'- xdriy L > n`-l: =tea °L" c� 9« q Cy r1y gxOl - ljyj fJ aLP vy ',^tom W_a,,. LoLC L!: paid Lc•A a' �o.A. c i >` o -orr�. rL iiw L'�J'� _ �n °° =`L'c W ecy v° W aO� Cyq qN.� ^N q`vo =0^ ao� Boa n� yu ems'° N^ ° NL`" G n'- y O l LPTa d - ` i L F L yL � \� aS '� Nmy t Lo. -dv. yv� i�oa u '^`a � `�•o.° A °Nq =incc` •e °m x_ AFL.+ �� V y p .P[ • .7 _ .. ¢• � �._n J = a�;v a uL� y P ydC 'L pV c� 'vI � y�A Nu LAC° Y 9 ^V 6y .� U PC' -CNNV Ay We V y CGtq r 'L >� V° q oA�P.y o.La •-. N i o c U a° f' rn G ^ d N ' _ �� r w N !n.- r r ¢¢i¢U L o°. _. - 6 W -�. c A O �c �� v`` Q c. ¢ ¢Eva L40L6W L_ZU.gNL .2� Oa ^� °y L yy910._ « « y Vwy CaC L J �.. _ dOOL _ _O ^ PPa WC I �grOO aLT ^Oy0 y0 _ ry W� 1 ' _ Lw u ur•F' 6L o�.W.rono i yn o c W qi �i v w aoaNe q s ^mss a� NmL p _ay P.,L W a u q 9 r? q= y y C q O l 0 rP q e" `L q_ d CLgrFpprFp 4•yua rLir V WL l'^ l Ear °y TEy ° Ny0A9� v N'9 a s °• � 4 AcYV�� 1 �C eQ Y JNP° V. C_y O NNyP v 06L EyU y _ NO •`o -n L « d4 � ^'�Np � � W CLLt 9 °VT O T .-ro •'� VLV LVT LCN « r> N WL NO ar N l] �arL d V�P� E v °•� ° cr a °.off° I�_'�•u° ` >L_u..�y� cN s° a � L ac LP A a A_LX mL x�c�,v � as -.• a _ r�Crr� r`.aLy °. NlP` COC u T� N A_° •Lrr 0 Z 'e0 OCUy� V. F4b ay�N CYV. yP'O t0 ^ y rpu LO O`agNE +°- :TOy��Y_ ° •L' a -_ •J' u `'o.. °c N °c f° ,u°,.'° U O ~ '� •L..r icJ G° N ° ' fr., Z O O V y O L 9 L C J P ° O� • d �y d •°.r J .� P T^ ° � L� l��� q W cgd^°V C^ V4 n'- > n`-l: =tea °L" 9« q Cy r1y gxOl - ljyj fJ paid W v° W aO� Cyq qN.� ^N O]�.b_aLLCL =0^ W yu yC 9 W N^ NL`" G n'- y O l d - ` i L F L •"• L .n Tr \� aS '� rJir r_ p t O 7 p O` •/1 f - C Q O rye O u V y p .P[ • .7 _ °•<w- � �.Tj rnry ydC 'L pV c� 'vI Oy C Jq TnwyV Pl _ 9 ^V 6y .� U PC' -CNNV Ay We V y CGtq V u 'L l J V° q .+ u� U _ f' rn G •� � a C �� r w N !n.- r r ¢¢i¢U N N 4 - 6 W -�. c A O �c �� v`` Q c. ¢ ¢Eva L40L6W L_ZU.gNL .2� PI I VI 1 u El lu 11 r ►: J �I o �i (h FA ; ♦t � C w < u �_ c - J q W I � T � N O •I D.� p L � � � � � � c p V ✓ n W u n T JJ y ✓ N 77 Tr T. C u C' .ui l 1�"•7 I N V — V u N c ^ � ✓ � r ♦r ✓ � — a � C � 6' e C Vr ✓ qG W V •J J✓ C"� n L 6� a IL ✓ _ fo � ° d O 4 4 y L u 4_ J 1 O `cn ✓`= L'a °N s Vo ^'q = a `'a y� -R ^u a ^oN Nn` x" c N ✓E� q V ✓t � `V NSO C � ° T� 1u D VurLC _ C Pu C o °< °i Y y ro' � ✓ d a N J m - J L L¢ q 1 O °` V L N �� V N C N n— N ✓ 1= N a W u T W q � C N D =I r O 6 V u ♦L � Y L N T C L •O^ q u� d L TQC ^�rL L pI ¢ c nl ♦` '^ q � ,"„Nio A V¢� F ci �o= Noa � r °o LL ♦.t � c "♦+xr ° v�m�°no LPP TG _� �• � O_✓ C��u✓ A C- ^-^ ^ p .mod W PsC V— `C yuL •ay � w� �.jp e✓ ¢^LiuP p 0° n0 u ✓ .0 VO NO��^ ��° L9 i •D+ oC�¢ NO._VQ \QJ1I�myI rP �tPw}.S q'^ 41m OV O 6q C2 �Vr •-�C 4G•+ 6 � rI C OI rI NI 6 _ � � 9I ,�I ♦^I i 6I U{ /1 I 1 Ir V S Pl � 4V t CL Pd P •mil C^ C� N✓ a V>rW L c°q v W =L•rn t'o °�c _c,♦ W °o '^ q pw� �>.o pr ♦G" WG y —� °1OL `ce •- -G� r EN °° ma c cc `o N¢um ✓ ✓ ✓ n ` L C C N C ^ ♦pr aVi mow• � � •v '^ O 6 N y� T O q ^ O LN° d v W Y✓ q N � ✓r D. G' ^r NNC Eiici v p= pry r0 a -a>. dN ✓ptLPj NOn �¢ VVM1 CP N —V ° __ ✓ — q n FF PL cNy •" TO � ✓P� ^qp °> V r ^v 7V d� G ° _' ♦,r..a G,r� ✓z � ",Le, NuV✓ ^c° r'_^ ✓d Ta... P — Gia N° q 4� L r J V °'cr auW ooWN m - "'W ✓v+mc`i —n — =c o :moo ° >� �•°o i �`� }. Lv qOP °o♦,`j, aN gomo G^ c N °w— cq ��� d Pgpa ✓� Vocrq „c °a qO nic c4ro Ly ocv ° Nnr✓ ND°c �L .e ^� o c Et P gyOSW Gl LCd jq.^ Cj S✓ Yl CCw-O L O l ✓ ^ uLWVId O L C g L P L q p nC r N A` ML r a ° =^ C P ✓ — Q V ^ Nl CNVT YI� NL�NN °`T jO S> uVq Tf!rV N ✓v� WO qd}� LO y¢c E ✓6— L d•p+ C r �L VCV NC L °C ��¢ oy WO q V O d p. r C✓ r C_O F V C G p a C^ T✓ N C L N r qn L O � N '� c W O.� ✓� n N � l� W L 9 D N q W�^ � k c O }r N4 N O� � w. N T ¢ J M} nY• . O C T Q .^ V L L A a c OL a M G M u � _ w f♦ V i14.1Q ✓°i Tq m ^' ✓ N 6 d� cSWr ::vLA �M� �, uP�000 4�J }P .Vi. v_ �. cen "'rte Wm I�e° F c^- °♦.¢a ^ .� l:V �rLN ^tip ^mCmC O✓ �- r — L m O ^D ✓dN q � N O N w 9 D_ ✓ C 9 ✓ Wr u W N C � d P 'E O. ♦n t L V } ¢ C D � C ♦r = u O N — — V d 4' V y n uVi C uui L c L _� •� T V q ^_ d v T C j 6 N 6 L Q N S V♦ V w Q g C O 6 4 tpi D N G 2 �^ J L F- �i (h FA ; M 0, �Iyr b 6 ✓ O L �� 0 .. q A O .ca V� q�ti _•P.m y✓✓ o�mo_ _';` c :aJ„ W is �' V c •C u q� a C� N U � T C � y y G` rC_i• �J a n•r CL! r q+ c _ _��� O :, w aa' r Cd= Ly b0 q PICT LL �2VrV O U c °• � ur t 6 + 'r „P W� •L o..ao .J .w.. qp Pd ii LLa „`� d q V l✓ a V W v ^ « q�A —o •r W crJ.r Wl r 0 6 9 L� •°r j O.A � >c u — 'i y°n oY _ w -_cE •r a c q +' N- 9 9q� '-, �c Je T1 aai r ,—e dr _ ✓bt «YC`. L g y „ U j . O q LL 'J •r O n g '� O� _ „T+ �_ c v✓aulL O ^ n.. LLr pc0✓ _ 4 a r K c L a0 —` U V q C wl{ q 02 Ny�' amV yLAr' c „ aN.+ N� pOO.til a0� •r0 N G LL.OrL ' E2 L U O O° r a _ d C O L V l •n L d t � 0• ° L � V v � n uUV �O. q „ _ u O� N� �Im � A✓ L yl 6M Cr N q °« P Om iN.].VnO r. u°a V q� O d9v �V�VU Pnu N PL• . _ PLp « —O Q„ .� •t« '^a2 ” yy` COQ rn OVrr.. ya - P✓ Page O T_d�Y O.0 L� _NrC�, Pr r V u A] r a O c P —Nf>C OU P4 v (p' < •dr ..� 0 u• j 9 rn P 7� t' 'e JO H V l-. rN O.d9> Q g q O COU•TgP L "^J .__+ q _ fV •r w„ O V Y L q O Or L LL 6] A'a V y 'r Q ou Qu 60rV QU•r0 6 q � VC•q v ,N N ✓ O L �� 0 P_ r•Jv q O .ca V� a rnu • g V u C L u u U m Z O a - a n•r q+ s roz c w Cd= Ly b0 W O U c °• � ur t 6 + 'r W� •L o..ao .J .w.. qp Pd ii LLa ac 6i • go.uO a V yxw•^T wt v 9 T q�A —o •r 'tea E-9 c A J] N- 9 „T+ �_ c v✓aulL a n.. LLr pc0✓ _ 4 a r K c L a0 —` U V q C q 02 �r0 NVC L_ ✓ c „ � � �q��V pOO.til rn N G E2 L U O O° N 6VL Wr.Q uUV �O. V.J LI T u O� N� �Im � V' 6 J� TI CIO, O P_I ul u oL cc — O W k O t O v' q C C W ly T yr A q a u C L L N C .Ln q C � `J O O _•I J E �� ca L T c a rnu n•r .d_ s Cd= Ly b0 °• La wv oqc Pd ii av ac • O a V r � � C T A J] N- 9 LLr +J L a0 �- q C 02 �r0 NVC c „ � � � _ P •r 9 G N 6VL Wr.Q uUV �O. V.J LI T r Y J E Y � • MCI O 6 E lIf D N Y C 7 — V C r^ T I T d CO G Y. � CY.rC u a ^ Y N 1y ' >. u o `o N � q a r .aT V G✓ L C o _ y p_ L A ` i m r ` u .• V M C Cy N V d .n ° ✓ d 9 O V r C�'cv cv�oim L c o d cu •`o c` - v � d ^' 1 V` 2✓ L ° y r vqq °aA Nc Ny _ ✓i c � T G p i r ✓ u .. .� ^ a O C — Js d L•L .r G d � u.0 L 9 9= q T n� p {IJ.DNpr ^RUC Nn ✓OU OC NC uC t - N W d O C ✓ T ✓ L 4 1 7 L N G C N J Nrw- d �•_L C 9 OL 6 N V N :a u_ N O v. O✓ O C V 6 •.d r N i t a.a 3 0 V 7 _ .N. �d ° j ^„• SS C' y Q C O L _ • C^ S° O a _ -� c lIf D N Y C 7 — V C T I T d CO G Y. � CY.rC u a ^ Y N 1y ' >. u o `o N � q a r .aT V G✓ L C o _ y p_ L A ` i m r ` u .• V M C Cy N V d .n ° ✓ d 9 O V r L � r � T G ✓9 t - — - �O inn _ .N. �d ° j ^„• SS C' y Q C O L ` y • C^ S° a -� c C y.�rD M — i I w�C N'N�• N�o` d._ .er v ✓ v rvt rl r y __ T zt 6J 9r C N' Lr GO.. ✓ G ° S Y L 4° r F .N. ° .N.i .a. n ^^O Nua Cr `q qYO VJ6 ` ^V— rW r� V. VL :'1 NPNrR• CP N a�i I — � C7'.— V•_ � t ry lIf O 0 i w- O D C q� L G •O. 7 = V N r v✓ — T i V d N = st a_ R j \ J O C u ✓ � ud• 4 0 c I 'OVti G� v'Aa t.N._i. c I I u 4 vo- c r 2 � 2•" V c i n E Lr� � I� � C �� O `y � TU r�r •q qL C r I I I u. ' �q C VT ✓ GAO ru, i 6i �V G L V✓ S 7 T _ •0.. N � T G O N�✓ 9 c I I I � U L_ C 12 U 9 C L V I S 4 q G G C O C L � 11` •0.. •,n C� q d w do =_ vN = °ice �U _u 1 ' ^G : a •'c ay p � N q •+ u ern ^I Zf zo ti't I ' �'• G GN NJ 2 L. '- . m _ 0 ,�0 •..rV L q O,q O T O O V O w ✓ .` ^r `r' U` oa V - � _ 0 0 = G q L= VJ C9 LC L Gq i4r �I V J V O V^ G= • W q C \ v� r0 I` •-• •I N rl �� \ ll UI j �I a w- O D C q� L G •O. 7 = V N r v✓ — T i V d N = st a_ R j \ J O C u ✓ � ud• 4 0 c I 'OVti G� v'Aa t.N._i. c I I u 4 vo- c r 2 � 2•" V c i n E Lr� � I� � C �� O `y � TU r�r •q qL C r I I I u. ' �q C VT ✓ GAO ru, i 6i �V G L V✓ S 7 T _ •0.. N � T G O N�✓ 9 c I I I � U L_ C 12 U 9 C L V I S 4 q G G C O C L � 11` •0.. •,n C� q d w do =_ vN = °ice �U _u 1 ' ^G : a •'c ay p � N q •+ u ern ^I Zf zo ti't I ' �'• G GN NJ 2 L. '- . m _ 0 ,�0