Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983/06/08 - Agenda Packet' � � ( ,° � �. � � • r.v � �. . •. .: +:v n' .,a �N�. :r . 1 "q; _ f'';� �. ._ � ,�� L �� �.., .1 .. ... ��� � r� � j' /,.. '� �.' � , � - -. y .7 QTY OF - �' \�} RANO iO CUCAMONGA VON' 'L� ,A1�Ti�TIG CC��'L`IiSSIO'�T 0 Z AGENDA .> WEDNESDAY JUNE 8, 1983 7.00 p.m. LION'S PARK C0.MOUTY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE, KkNCKO CUCAMOMA, CALIFORNIA L Pledge of Allegiance IL Ron Can Commissioner Barker _ Commissioner Juarez Commissioner McNiel Ill. Announcements May 11, 1983 V. Comet Calendar Commissioner Rempei Commissioner Stout — The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME B. FOR Tentative Tract 10349 - Kelber k�" Tentative Tract 11563 - Red Hill Partners Tentative Tract 10046 - Anden a. Tentative Tract 10047 - Anden Tentative Tract 11625 - Roberts Group Tentative Tract 11663 - Mariborough C. TRACT 10491 - LIGHTNER - The redesign of 20 single amity homes op 4.78 acres o land in the R -1 zone, located at the southwreFc corner of Victoria Street and Ramona - APN 202 - 181 -04. Planning Coirrni .sion Agenda June 8, 1983 Page 2 D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOP) nc%nrw RZ_99 - RnRT:RT !NDNTTFk('Ti7RTN(: - development oI a zz,uuu square Ioot warenouse /orlice addition to an existing industrial complex located on 4.7 acres of land in the Minimum Impact heavy Industrial zone (Subarea 9) located on the southeast corner of Jersey Boulevard and Utica Avenue - APN 209 - 143 -06. V% Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. PIease wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your nerve and address. Ali such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT _ AND ZONE CHANGE 83-01 - CHRISTESON - A change of zone from A -1 (Limited Agriculture ) to C -2 General Business Commercial) for 13.1 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN 1077- 401 -01, 03. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE FEV.f .fl" 233 -U "1 - L;kJKQjJ" bU1v - lne aevelopmenl v1 u1e Virginia Dare Center, a business park consisting of office, banking, and restaurant uses comprising of 10 buildings on 13.1 acres of land in the A -1 zone (C -2 pending) a;:�°ated at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN 1077- 401 -01, 03. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE 1L1*11t - liLiV1&LrL - K TOt21 OCYCiVU111Ci1+ i JU auvu +•+�ay.a v+ 12.3 acres into 93 lots comprising 92 detached single family units in the R -2 zone, generally located s� .th of Mignonette Street between Beryl and Opal Streets - APN 202- 032 -71. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7972 - PNEUDRAULICS, INC. - A division of 8.5 acres into 2 lots within Subarea 3 of the Industrial Specific Plan located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Helm-, Avenue - APN 209 - 021 -25. L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AKGA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -01 - An amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan regarding development standards for interim uses. Planning romnission Agenda June 8, 1983 Page 3 VII. Dire: -ton's Reports J. EQUESTRIAN TRAIL GUIDELINES - Amending Resolution 81 -53 ester: ^lashing trail design standards. K. PROPOSED P VIEL. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission.. Items to be discussed here ar> those which do not already appear on this agenda. DL Adjournment The planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. VICINITY WARM Rlf(RMAMMAL Ammer AN CITY OF RARCHO CUCA AD"GA . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting May 11, 1983 CALL TO ORDER [%airman , He -mar3 Rempel, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Panebo ^amonga Planning Commission to order at 7:05 Par- The meeting was held at Lions Park Jommunity Center, 9161 Base Line Rcaa, Rancho Cucamonga, .ifornia. CYair^an Hempel then led in the p /edgy_- of allegiance. 9 a 3 i ! ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: David Barker, Larry Mc Niel, Dennis Stout, Herman Rempel SENT; COMMISSIONERS: Addie Juarez STAFF PRESENT: Rick Gomez, City Planner; Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner; Joan Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Jack Lam, Director of Community Development; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer; Michael Vairin, Senior Planner ANNOUNCEMENTS Rick Gomez, City Planner, advised that the City Council will conduct a pubic hearing on the Etiwanda Specific Plan on May 17, 1983, 7 p• Park Community Center. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by McNiel. to approve the Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission meeting of April 13, 1983• Commissioners Barker and Rempel abstained because they were not present at that meeting. Commissioner Juarez was absent. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Barker asked that items B ani E be removed from th' Consent Calendar for discussion purposes. Chairman Hempel asked that item D be removed for discussion. Motion- M=ved by Barker, seconded by Stout, carried, to approve items A and C of the Consent Calendar. A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL IN Yt[VIJUU-' iirL ruff 11� Vivyvrtivi�n ua�a. — TENTAT_'. TRACTS 11625 AND 11781 - ROBERTS - A redesign in product type of two prev B. EXTENSION OF PARCEL MAP 6114 - VISTA 32'VESTMENT - Located at the southwest corner of Ramona and Foothill Boulevard. Commissioner Barker requested that each tentative tract listed in Item B be viewed individually. Further, he indicated that he wished to address 'three of the four which were listed. Commissioner Barker asked whether Tentative Tract No. 9659 bears the responsibility of a sound attenuation wall around the tract or whether Caltrans assumes this responsibility. He asked 'how previous Commissions responded and what protection there is. Chairman Rempel explained that the Caltrans policy is now to install sound attenuation walls if a development is completed prior to a freeway. He further explained that it is difficult to impose that kind of requirement on a developer when it is unknown if a freeway is to be built above or below ground level. Chairman Hempel stated that when this particular tract previously came before the Commission, staff had proposed that the developer construct a sound attenuation wall. Mr. Doug Gorgen, 7333 Hellman, the developer, addressed the Commission and reiterated that it will be the responsibility of Caltrans to install a sound attenuation wall if the freeway does not develop before the tract. He further indicated that a 5-6 foot wall will be installed for each lot for the purpose of selling the houses. Commissioner Barker asked if Caltrans is slow in putting in the walls. Chairman Hempel replied that during the past few years Caltrans has built many walls for homes adjacent to freeways. Further, that the walls are now required because of the EIR process and he did not feel that this requirement will change. Commissioner Barker went on to discuss Tentative Tract No. 10363. He indicated that at the time this tract was approved there was no requirement for a community trail because a Community Trail Element did not exist. Mr. Gomez replied that a Community Trail Element did exist at that time. Commissioner Barker indicated that he did not see provisions for it. Planning Commission Minutes -2- May 11, 1983 Mr. Gomez stated that there was a condition for implementation of a trail. commissioner Barker replied that if it is there, there is no problem. Commissioner Barker stated that on Tract No. 11013, there is a problem with eucalyptus trees and their location. He stated that the map did not actually identify where these trees are. Mr. ( -)mez replied that with the storms last year, the vast majority were knocked down or so severely damaged that they required removal. potion: Moved by Barker, seconded by K--Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt Item B, approving time extensions for Tentative Tract No.'s 11459, 11013, 10363 and 9659. down Chairman Rempel stated that there is a problem with drainage nago.e approval is Vincent relative to Parcel Map 6114. He given to change the map, the drainage problem should be taken care of. Mr. Rougeau asked if the Commission would like an additional condition on how the drainage would be handled if Vincent is not built. Chairman Rempel stated that some cities have provisions meet the approval of the city so that the parcel can be adequately drained without going into the parcel below it. ?ie further stated that we should have a similar condition. Mr. Rougeau replied that the project engineer would be asked to do this as a one -half width exists on Vincent and if it could not be built it could be drained by some temporary means. W. Rougeau stated that there is also access to Arrow. Mr. Tim Mim Mack, the engineer of this parcel map stated that they have designed Vincent with a full width; howyver, one property owner has refused to sell a portion that is needed. lie indicated that they will be able to drain through a dedication. Mr. Mim Mack stated that they have a grading plan on file which shows lots 9 through 13 going into Vincent Avenue with none of them draining directly south. Mr. Hopson asked what will happen to the little piece of parcel one that is west of where the proposed Vincent meets Arrow. Further, does Lt remain as part of parcel one and if a little piece was separated on the west by a street 44 -feet wide, would it create maintenance problems. Mr. Rougeau replied that it will be shown as part of parcel one and will require irrigation with landscaping to be installed as part of parcel one or that it be made part of the property with an option for the adjacent property owner to buy it. Mr. Hopson stated that this is the ideal thing but this cannot be required. Planning Commission Minutes -3- May 11 ; 1983 Mr. Rougeau replied that the condition on the resolution was to take care of that problem. Commissioner Mc Niel asked Mr. Mim Mack if he had any dialogue with the property owner of that little sliver of land about this. Mr. Mim Mack replied that drainage problems were not discussed but that the builder has made adeuqate provisions that drought resistant material is to be put in. Chairman Hempel asked if this could be conditioned so that the little piece will be maintained as a park or something similar. Mr. Rougeau replied that a homeowners association would have to be established and the thought was that this be conditioned so that the owner of parcel one is responsible for its maintenance. Chairman Hempel stated that since the parcel is approximately 6,000 -7,000 square feet, it should be conditioned. Mr. Rougeau replied that the Landscape Assessment District is currently set up for residential areas only, but felt it could be extended to include this area as well. Mr. Rougeau also suggested that a portion could be used as a park. Chairman Hempel felt that this shov.ld be placed within the condition. Mr. Mim Mack stated that a problem exists with the people who live along the railroad line. Further, that they have been offered two times what the property is worth but they refuse to sell their portion of land. He asked if Ilk the City could implement condemnation proceedings to acquire this property. Mr. Hopson replied that while the City does have the power of condemnation, he would not like to second guess the City Council because it is only they who can do it. Mr. Rougeau replied that the staff is still trying to work something out. Further, the drainage can be handled, and access is not critical. Mr. Hopson, stated that with any condemnation action, the public need =st be served and it must be demonstrated that condemnation is the only alternative before it is exercised. Motion: Moved by Hempel, secor_ded by Stout, carried unanimously, that there be adequate drainage design and that an assessment be added to our Landscape Assessment District or some other method to ensure that landscaping is maintained. Planning Commission Minutes -4- May 11, 1983 Commissioner Barker stated that he was concerned with the lack of amenities shown on Phase I of the conceptual landscaping plan for Tentative Tract 12305. Further, that the plan as now shown is not the same tract as had previously been approved. Mr. Gomez replied that the map given to the Planning Commission was incorrect and that the correct map shows the comments as in Fhase I. Commissioner Barker stated he had no other concerns. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to approve this revision per discussion using the correct tract map. PUBLIC HEARINGS F. ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7902 - LINL - A division of 2.37 acres into 4 parcels within the R -1 zone, looted on the south side of Wilson Avenue at M.ilberry Avenue - APN 201 - 181 -50. (Continued from Planning Comiission meeting of April 27, 1983.) Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Stout asked if anything has occurred on the mirror image parcel map across from this. Mr. Rougeau replied that nothing has happened; however, the upper lot on the west side has a building permit pulled, although nothing has finaled. Chairman Rempel asked if the drainage on the north side of Wilson has been adequately taken care of. Mr. Rougeau replied that he has not observed whether it has been taken care of but the engineer for the project, who is present, could speak to this. Mr. Rougeau further replied that some street improvements have been made south of this, such a: the installation of curb and gutter which has helped. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mr. G. Wilson, civil engineer, stated he has a Question regarding the property to the east. He indicated that they do not yet have an approved street plan but are very close. Further, that they must get a 10 -foot easement from the property owner to complete and finalize the plan. Mr. Wilson stated that No. 3 in the condition of approval should be a 24 -foot easement rather than a 24 -inch easement. Commissioner Stout asked where the 24 -inch storm drain would go as shown an the grading plan. Planning Commission Minutes -5- May 11, 1983 Mr. Wilson replied it will match up and flow into the planned development to the south. There being no further questions, the public nearing was closed. Notion: Moved by Me Niel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -64 approving Parcel Map 7902 and issuing a Negative Declaration. f 5 f • • Chairman Rempel asked that item G, Environmental Assessment and Sign Ordinance- Revisions, be placed at the end of this agenda for further discussion. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12332 - LABAND - A custom lot residential subdivision of 204 lots on 140.98 acres of land in the R- 1- 20,000 zone, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Hillside Drainage Channel - APN 201 - 121 -12. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. He stated that the Trails Committee had imposed an additional condition for a 10 -foot easement at the north side of lot 74 which is at the very northeast corner of the project. In addition to that there is a requirement for easement where the east -west connector trail occurs for a 50 -50 share of easement. Chairman Rempel opened the public heac•ing. Mr. Paul Edwards, representing the developer, stated that their main concern is to create a development with a good character and they have tried to show this through the generous use of landscaping. Yr. Edwards stated that they have no objections to the conditions, with the expection of one, which would be addressed by Mr. Prank Williams of Associated Engineers. Mr. Williams asked about Vie requirement for sidewalks in this area. Fes. Rougeau replied that to be consistent with Planning Commission policy on through roads, sidewalk, are appropriate on one side. He indicated that they are unnecessary on most cul-de -sacs; hoverer, on loops or major streets where there is heavy traffic, they are necessary. Mr. Williams stated there Is no objection to sidewalks on one side of the street. Commissioner Stout asked why people c4ild not walk on the equestrian trails. Planning Commission Minutes -6- May 11, 1983 Chairman Rempel replied that the reason for the requirement for sidewalks is because in the rainy season the trails are rendered impassible. He indicated that school children need somewhere to walk where they will not get covered with mud. Ccmmissioner Barker stated his agreement with Chairman Rempel. Chairman Rempel stated that he did not see anything that shows where the drainage will occur on the cul-de -sacs. Mr. Williams stated that drains are shown on the map. commissioner Stout questioned lot 144. Mr. Williams replied that this particular lot is a large orc and was given a number because they don't know what its disposition will be. Further, that the Flood Control District has not yet made up its mind and if it becomes a usable property it will remain there until they know whether they can use it and will be withheld until the end of the project. loWiliams stated asl j long as possibletint order dtoeal.lo the a decision from interest from theFlood Control District. Chairman Rempel stated that these lots will have to come back to Design Review to be sure there is drainage. Commissioner Barker asked if it will be necessary to put that condition in. Mr. Hopson replied that it is already there unless it comes in for further subdivision. Commissioner Mc Niel asked if the developer intends to develop approximately 25 lots in each phase and whether phase one will start at Haven. Mr. vi.iliams replied yes, that it is essential. Commissioner K-Niel asked what the development time will be on this project. tfl,-. LaBand, the developer, replied that it is very difficult to state and he intends to go slow. He has no time plan. Mr. Williams explained that this is an eight -phase concept and that the numoer is an arbitrary one in order to divide the project into one that is workable in size due to the economic conditions at this time. Commissioner Barker asked about landscaping requirements. Mr. Vairin replied that they will be required to be installed with the street improvements. planning Commission t-irates -7- May 11, 1983 Mr. Hopson stated that two conditions would indicate that there is to be a homeowners association and asked how it would be set up; if it would be immediate: and how the interior lots would be maintained. Mr. Williams replied that a homeowners association is necessary for the equestrian easements and landscare area and that it may be necessary to annex into a maintenance assessment district. Mr. Vairin stated that the condition is worded in such a way that the City would be covered no matter which way they go. Mr. Roy Schauben, representing the Deer Creek Homeowners Association, stated that the applicant, through Mr. Williams, had met the homeowners association on this project. Further, that a number of issues had been mitigated through this meeting; however, the association has concerns about the architecture that will result from this project. He indicated that this project will have to be architecturally correct since they will be in the Deer Creek community. Mr. Shauben also voiced strong concern over the bridle trails that would be in the rear of the homes. He indicated that the trails are in the front of homes in Deer Creek and this requires neatness. Mr. Shauben also voiced concern witb landscaping and how much would be put in initially. Further, that in order to feel secure with the project to the north, they were willing to accept the trails if it meets the Deer Creek homeowner association specs and guidelines. &s then asked that they be required to be placed through their CC&RIs under the Deer Creek Homeowners Association. Chairman Rempei stated that one problem with this is that the trails in front of the property are private and those proposed in this project are public. Mr. Shauben stated that the trails on Haven and Wilson are community trails. Chairman Rempel stated that this is not true. Mr. Vairin stated that a regional trail is shown on the north side of the channel but actually wi.11 be on the south side, and with regard to the slope which Mr. Shauben felt .as excessive, it was within the Flood Control District and that the City does not allow more than a two percent crossfall. Mr. Edward] stated that he has never heard of a preexisting homeowners association abs:rbing another one. Mr. Hopson stated t:sat if Mr. Edwards was asking if this is legally possible, it is; however, it cannot be compelled. He indicated that the mechanism for this would be for the existing homeowners association to vote on accepting the new project and while it is legally possible to do so, it may not be forced. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission Minutes -8- FOy 11, 1983 Commissioner Barker asked if what Mr. Vairi.-1 is saying is that the regional trail will be oz the south side of the Flood Control channel. Mr. Vairin replied that it will be and that the local trail will occur on individual lots. He indicated that it will be elevated above the Flood Control channel and will be on those lots. Commissioner Barker asked Mr. Hopson if there is any authority on the part of the City to ea orce or require an agreement as discussed by the Deer Creek Homeowners Association. Mr. Hopson replied that the City can require this developer to come up with an agreement on trails and landscaping but may not require them to become a part of the Deer Creek Homeowners Association. Commissioner Stout s *ated that the Regency tract 11as rear lot trails and that they are well maintained. He then asked if it is intended to keep this private. Mr. Edwards replied that it is intended that the interior be kept private. Commissioner Stout asked if there is some reason this is preferable. Mr. Vairin explained the difference between a :ommunity and individual trail. Commissioner Stout stated that while Deer Creel is one of the finest tracts in the City, he does not see -nything wrong with the way this project is designed. Commissioner Stout asked what the mechanics are to give special notice to the Deer Creek Homeowners Association when this protect is reviewed. Mr. Vairin replied that the City has a good syste.,i for notification purposes and that the Deer Creek Homeowners are contacted 0.1 these items. Notion: moved by Stout, seconded by Mc Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -6, approving Tentative Tract. 12332, and issuing a Negative Declaration with an amendment for an additional trail condition. a a a a a 8:20 p.m. The Plannir3 Commission. recessed 8:37 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened Planning Commission Minutes -9- May 11, 1983 Commissioner Stout stated that he would hate to see someone with a. recreational vehicle left with no place to park it. W. Rougeau replied that the notification process would provide art opportunity for these homeowners to come forward. Further, that no one h.?3 t—en notified at this point because this is preliminary to the process. Mr. Rougeau replied that the first step is to go to the City Council with a report and a recommendation. Then a date is set for a public hearing one month later. The public hearing is held and that is where the City Council would approve the alley vacation. Mr. Rougeau stated that they would have to report on the problem lot with no front access and that those people could not be forced to put in a front driveway. Mr. Gerald Edwards, the applicant, indicated that lots one and two are zoned commercial and are owned by the same person. He indicated that they would be developed on Foothill Boulevard. Mr. Edwards further stated that the alley is not being used at the present time with the exception of the office building and that he has not been in touch with any of the property owners regarding the vacation. Fir. Edwards stated that as far as the staff report is concerned all conditions are acceptable with the exception of the requirement for bronze glass. He stated that he is considering a lease to an auto parts supply company and they will require clear glass. Further, that he is considering within the lease the provision for good housekeeping. Chairman Rempel replied that as far as housekeeping is concerned, the shop keeper will be covered by the Sign Ordinance in what he can display and t;--t would ensure that the area be kept neat. Mr. Edwards reiterated the necessity of having clear glass in the store front in order to attract customers. He indicated that it is impossible tottehlou h whether a business is open or closed due to the inability 8 tbeF bronze glass. Mx. Vairin replied that the requirement for bronze glass was not staff directed. 9e indicated that the requirement was more design related. Commissioner Barker stated that this had come up in Design Review and was bases: upon the design element. Commissioner Stout stated that this particular use does not require a think that people conditional use permit. He further stated that he did not in state of disrepair. would like to see parts of an automobile lying around that he not leave the Fe asked if there is some condition that would require parts in front of the store. Planning Commission Minutes -11- May 11, 1983 I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7963 - BARTON - A division of 13.22 acres into 3 parcels within Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - AP& 208- 351 -19. Commissioner McNiel stepped down from discussion on this item due to a possible conflict of interest. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil !hgineer, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mr. James Barton, the applicant, stated that he has three concerns: the 35 -foot drive standard on Raven and 30 -foot drive on Foothill. He stated that he discussed both of these with Paul and they are both acceptable with him. Mr. Barton stated that under the street improvement section., the median island for Haven which was discussed at the March 9 meeting would have a bond posted for it and would be done at the same time that the County does theirs. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -67, approving Parcel Map 7963 and issuing a Negative Declaration., NEW BUSINESS J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -08 - EDWARDS - The development of a 3,858 square foot auto service building on .37 acres of land in the C-2 zone, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, 750' east of Grove - APN 207 -112 -7 & 8. Curt .iohnst -un, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report. commissioner Stout asked tc see a location map and what alley the applicant was requesting to be vacated. Further, he asked if that alley vacation has been cleared with the single family property owners to find out if they would no longer have access. Mr. Rougeau replied that the west end would have to be looked at, however, they would have to look at the access. Commissioner Mc Niel asked if the alley is currently being used by the homeowners. W. Rougeau replied that the alley is not paved, however, it is being used. Planning Commission Minutes -10- May 11 , 1983 Mr. Vairin replied that under the zoaing ordinance there is a section called design review :which states that if the provisions of the Ordinace are not upheld, the shop keeper faces possible revocation of the use. This holds true for violations of the ordinance as well. Commissioner Stout asked if the gate that separates the area will be opaque. Mr. Johnston stated that it will be something that cannot be seen through. Nc. Edwards explained the wood slat gate that they used in one of his Pomona stores. Commissioner Stout asked if the lease could contain a clause that there be no parking in front of the driveway. Chairman Rempel stated that the Commission does not have the right to review the lease. Mr. Hopson stated that a condition of the lease could be that the tenant has to comply with all conditions of the law. Further, that if the City tells the landlord that it will shut the tenant down, he will comply. Commissioner Mc Niel stated that he has had some experience in the retail situation and the applicant is correct in that you can't tell when a store is open or closed with the bronze glass. Chairman Rempel stated that the bottom panel is where the unkempt look will appear. Commissioner Mcii_el requested that the bronze windows be dropped out of the condition. Chairman Rempel stated *_hat the bottom panel should also be dropped out and that landscaping and mounding be placed in front with some type of masonry like an 18 -inch bulk head at the bottom. Mr. Edwards stated that if you can't see people in the store or its merchandise, you will not know if the store is open. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: bbved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -68, approving Development Review 83 -08, and issuing a Negative Declaration, with the deletion for the requirement of a bronze window and a condition for a bulk head, and in lieu of item 5, the wording suggested by Mr. Vairin that is contained within the Ordinance regarding storage of automobiles as a condition of this project. c * s 0 i Planning Commission Minutes -12- May 11, 1983 G. ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS - An amendment to the Sign Ordinance contained within Title 14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. This is a comprehensive amendment intended to improve the administration and to provide for more effective signing. The basic regulations are not being changed. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner McNiei stated that with respect to banners and the use of flags, the proposed Ordinance says that in a string of flags, a maximum of six may be used. He asked if that was six flags on a string or six strings of flags. FIX. Vairin replied that he had been referring to flags on a pole. Strings of flags is a di:ferent category and is permitted for grand opening sales or special events. Further, they are not listed in this new category. Commissioner Parke-r asked how many hardships are anticipated. Mr. Vairin replied a large number; however, they looked at many situations and found that the vast majority have been removed because of wind damage or property caner participation. Further, that they are looking at a couple that are legitimate, and when people ask for a variance, staff sits down and shows what findings they must comply with in order to establish a hardship. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mr. Bob Glasscock, representing the Chamber of Commerce, stated that this proposed Sign Ordinance is a great improvement and was needed. Further, that the Chamber of Commerce is very happy with it and it is something t1mt can be lived with. Mr. Dave Kiedrowski, hardware store owner, stated that the City will probably not be able to satisfy everyone but that this Ordinance is a big step forward. Further, that if it is found that more problems develop perhaps the Ordinance can be reviewed in a few years. Chairman Rempel stated that there should probably be some mechanism that would automatically cause the Ordinance to come up for review in about 18-24 months. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Stout stated that Section 26, the rule relative to roof signs should be stated first and then the exception listed. He indicated that the first sentence should be revised. Commissioner Stout stated that he has no problem with the hardship findings but would suggest that the wording be modified to a better statement of what the Commission's feeling is with regard to the amortization of signs. planning Commission Minutes -13- Nay 11, 1983 commissioner Stout stated that anyone who has to replace a sign will feel it hardship and it should be understood so the wording should be strong. Further, there should be emphasis on the process and burden. Commissioner Stout felt that the Sign Ordinance is a good attempt at balancing the process. Commissioner Barker stated that the proposed Ordinance is a good piece of work and that the City can be proud of it. He indicated that many people have worked hard to pull it together. Chairman Rempel stated that the size of the directory signs might be a problem. Further, that the lettering must be visible to alleviate the problem with being able to see the sign. He felt that instead of saying it is a maxim:m of 16 square feet or 3 X 5, there must be clearance as well. He felt that the dimensions could be increased to 25 square feet or 5 X 5. Commissioner Stout asked why the size is not made dependent upon its use in the shopping center. Mr. Vairin replied that there would be a problem based on the number of tenants. Further, that they have as many as 22 in some of the centers and 12 in the others. He indicated that this was done to accommodate 12 tenants. Commissioner Stout asked what happens in the event there are 22 tenants. Mr. Vairin replied that they would have to double the sign. Farther, in the larger centers you would want :;o have the signs on different ends of the area and vice versa. Chairman Rempel stated that :here has to be some type of system to ensure that the lettering is not too small and architecturally appealing. He felt that. limiting the sign to 16 square feet was rather small. Mr. Riedrowski stated that the Chairman's point is well taken and that in the discussion they did not really think of how fast you must read in order to be able to see the sign. Be indicated that in the Sunrize Center there is a problem with a 3 X 5 foot sign because of the way the center is laid out. He felt that Mr. Vairin's suggestion of wording on one side and not on the other is good and that *,here should be more leeway. Mr. Vairin stated that they could do some sketches to see how it would work and that they did not set in the proposal a maximum number of signs. Be indicated that side -by-side signs might have an architectural break within the design. lie further indicated that the kiosk type could be used and that they will take a look at the suggestions and do a design. Mr. Lam stated that there would be no problem with size and wondered if that could be achieves within the constraints of the proposal. He indicated that the one point that tom. Vairin hit upon is that if you want to put more signs on one location, it is probably better to put two on two. Planning Commission Minutes -14- May 11, 1983 Mr. Lam stated that it does not matter what size the sign is if it is architecturally treated, even if it is two sides because you will still have the ability to pick out what you are looking for. Further, if you want two 30 -square foot signs you might want to have one at one end of the center and the other at the other end because when you have 40 tenants in the center it is hard to pick out the one you are looking for. Chairman Rempel stated that the ordinance should have some indication of that intent rather than state a max!.=m square foot amount. Mr. Lam stated that when the review is done this can be incorporated through the language. Mr. Vairin stated that this language could be put in so that the placement and number could be indicated and also the reasoning behind doing this. Mr. Vairin stated that this would be appropriate and a very good point. Mr. Lam stated that they will insert language that will allow more flexibility. Mr. MoNiel stated that the same problem exists with the next statement down and that Section 3 on the same page with the directory signs at the main entrances The consensus of the Commission was that the word "main" be left out. Chairman Tempel reopened the public hearing. C-ny- iciiaan, Jim Frost stated that the City has t%:^ee professionals available in reading skills and they would be able to tell wnat kind of signs would have the most readability urdev any given time and circumstance. He felt in light of the prior -us- °ion, this could be t;rned into an objective exercise and be brought back for further discussion. Councilman Frost Pelt that Section 40 just before Section 41 regarding hardships is a somewhat ambiguous definition and needed to be changed. Mr. Vairin replied that the ability to read signs was one of the points examined by members of the Sign Ordinance Committee. He indicated that a to t book. Street Graphic, that deal.- . with sign readability be made available if Councilman Frost wished to see it. Mr. Lam sated that this is one of the challenges of dealing t be read aleignHe program because no matter what size is allowed, the signs and graphics. indicated that a good sign would be a combination of desig n 6 P After brief discussion, the concensus of the Commission was to vote o whether to recommend the Sign ordinance to the Council with the changes planning Commission Minutes -15- May 11 , 1983 W: Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by McNiei, carried unanimously, to recommend adoption of the Sign Ordinance to the City Council with the revisions and additions discussed. * * * * * ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adjourn. 9:55 p.m. The Planning Commission Adjourned Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -16- May i1, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA j0+EMORANDUM DATE: June 8, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSIONS FOR TENTATib'E TRACTS 70046, 10047 and 10349 As you may be aware, the City Council recently adopted Resolution No. 83 -70 establishing a policy for keeping of animals within the "Equestrian /Rural" area of the City. Since Tentative Tracts 10045, 10047, and 10349 are 20,000 sq. ft. subdivisions above Banyan Street, it is recommended that the following condition be added for consistency with the Council Resolution: the CC &R's for the tract shall not prohibit the keeping of equine anamials, where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. A copy of the CC &R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to re- cordation of the Final Map. The applicants for each of the three tracts were contacted and all agreed.to the above condition. Respectfully submitted, Rick omez City Ilanner i G:CJ:jk J VIL �_ Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be dangerous trees - trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially for at the descretion of the Planning Division shall be approved removal during the review of the Master Plan of Existing on -Site Trees. Those be on a trees which are approved for removal may be required to replaced tree -for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in for the City of Rancho _Z4. accordance with the Paster Plan of street trees be planted at an average of every 30' on interior Cucamonga and shall streets and 20 on Exterior streets. 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70 % -15 shall be provided within the gallon, and 10 % -5 gallon. �6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and irrigated in accordance with __V_1Oe7. are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope slope planting requirements planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and irrigation shall appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and in a heairhy and thriving condition by the be continuously maintained developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. inspection of the slopes Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in shall be completed satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all completion of grading such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon control satisfactory to the Building or an alternative method of erosion custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to official. Irrigation on and to a point 5 months after germination. germinate the seed 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained acceptable to the City. Such by a homeowners association or other means be submitted to the City prior to issuance proof of maintenance shall of building permits. 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall submitted plans. _Z be installed by the developer in accordance with The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and and shall _Z10. sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans be subject to approval by the Planning Division. _6. it i,n plant c.i 11. A minimum of specimen size U-c=3 ^ -•• -- - - -- within the project. 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman is required along size trees, and an abundance of landscaping i 03c4q VIL G signs _ 1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinancp, and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installat ;on of such signs. _ 2. A uniform sion program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. _ 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Approvals Required _ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. _ 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. _ 3_ Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance /Conditional Use Permit _ 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. _z5_ The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their proparty. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract , on ' I have read the C.C_ & R.'s and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the 57rpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access_ Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. �6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or pri issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, writ.. certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. I a 54`t D -9 I 11 11 E CPY'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 8, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner By: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: REQUEST FOP. TIME EXTENSION FOR Cllr 8i -18 - JASKA - 9ACKGROUND: fie applicant is requesting a time extension for the above Industry— project located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, south of 6th Street. The project is a contractor's office and yard with two buildings totaling 12,795 square feet on 3.5 acres of land in the General Industrial /Rail Served category (Subarea 5). initially, the project was approved on January 13, 1982, with an expiration date oflicant is requesting au one o(1) the yea current economic ti conditions, the app me extension consistent with Zoning Ordinance provisions. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a one (1) year extension be grante or t.1s project. The current expiration date would be extended to July 13, 1984. Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Lxn7Dlt -t5' - Si Le Plait Exhibit "Cu - Elevations Conditions of Approval Resolution of Approval ITEM A 1 ` .. �.TR .✓-u. � 3 SL -- F b R' 1 Aj I OR 1 H CITY OF 1TE�I =Tramsycs�t - G.u. ?•� -iR RANCHO CUCATmoNGA nTu: r_v_Mll s, �,-r� 7L PLAMING DIVEnN EtiHIBrr-. -Y-7 SCALE- w: 11 i 0 T..1 M�- �y_roc °ni wtt I.IjT,��•IC I.' 11 ,1�1,1j 1 ,1,1 1 14"t I l I 111l.. i J. µ•1.,.1.1. r.�. Iej 1 I \dal N[. yWf m! T4C1Y 10.11 . IR •.Afo IbM��Rar' Y..s tiva. ^i li 'II „II I .li III I I -� I �II I - -- - - -- t- f 1 KIM G1G yr YS CI'T'Y OF c.o A al-lam RANCHO CUCAVIO \'GA Try: 4-� ,r PLANNING DIVOGv Extitrm scALE-.- L1.s. 0 I I , . n Kb I I I J � I I II I I. I � Ti ��••s....ra ��.!'f+. W roc am•.+u„ !.�•i: a sew MG v. raw K/ R' fDl.• InL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN,10.N Pi.._kiNTNTI \G DIMS ONT II. i ITE:Nt = P.81 -tf,_ TITLE= CE51 � EXPIE:T -- SCALE. Vj k 9 c, 0 o; bl 'wYT �+1L^t Y•! I I II..� 'iJ •i � I`i � I r - I, I � I ' I ,,:, i � �IJ i� i• I..., I +• - I t R' fDl.• InL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN,10.N Pi.._kiNTNTI \G DIMS ONT II. i ITE:Nt = P.81 -tf,_ TITLE= CE51 � EXPIE:T -- SCALE. Vj k 9 c, 0 o; bl 'wYT �+1L^t Y•! LJ ' II- 0 �t 4i.. .er.• +v �r_rs 1,Tr L 'Y y II � Y li it '' r � I r CITY OF 1"t NI. "r RAINCHO CLCayiONGA T1TLE- -FmLy it s g--\L -i - N-�. PLANriNTL\'G MrSION EXHIBIT: C -3 SCALD- - -L5 art. .. rcR � 111' i �t 4i.. .er.• +v �r_rs 1,Tr L 'Y y II � Y li it '' r � I r CITY OF 1"t NI. "r RAINCHO CLCayiONGA T1TLE- -FmLy it s g--\L -i - N-�. PLANriNTL\'G MrSION EXHIBIT: C -3 SCALD- - -L5 A RESOLUTION OF COMMISSION APPRI NO. 81 -18 FOR A LOCATED AT 9400 INDUSTRIAL /RAIL RESOLUTION NO. 82 -05 THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING ?VING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONTRACTOR'S OFFICE AND YARD LUCAS RANCH ROAD IN THE GENERAL SERVED ZONE WHEREAS, on the 12th day of December, 1981, a complete application was filed by Martin Jaska, Inc. for review of the above - described projeci; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of January, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga Panning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW., THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Com.,nission resolved as foiiows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 0 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions _ applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmer.` and that a Negative Declaration is issued on January 13, 1982. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -18 is approved subject to the following conditions and the attached standard conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Undulating turf mounding shall abut the 8' high decorative block wall to reduce the visual impact of its height. Details of the mounding shall be submitted with the landscape and irrigation plans subject to Planning Division approval, prior to issuance of building permits. r1 U CC_ e, - I 10 kesolution No. 82 -05 Page 2 0 _ 2. Details of the view obstructing gate at the entrance to the yard shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The landscaped area along the street frontage shall be :Hounded and significantly iandscaped. Consideration shall be given to a drought tolerant landscape design. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1982, PLANNING COMMISSION OF a ngg. !(/j a rman / 1, i�j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,ammng Co-uniission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced. passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of January, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Tolstoy, Dahl, Sceranka, Kira NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None E�_ r- Z r fL' � �u O G E t � T 9 tJ G t 9 ^ O O� O � C c 9 v C S V t p N y✓ d J o oz G V_ u W rmi � � d � ° L Z > ° O Fr' W C v S L G A V w 0 H c O P V Y O C ° Z d w N p r q T q V G v O C O b 6 N V M p C a N O E O a V e v ^ 0 FyC O L ° z z 0 O O� " T " O � S C C t D a d✓ O G� 9 S ` •GO q ^ r 9 i o J G ^ ••••� OJ y Y y ✓» �vC^ u L �_ JC q V •^V V A^ N C >? NLO r d L O C O N O q q G _°b� ✓ O L r �> q dp dV6 G ✓9 < CV Cr d � 9 N.'+u d P Nc n<Qri c N >�y0 FO �C9 FP VO .Ln � 9`F J� a L O xe ° O ° N C d °�r.`N ° d �c r..°u = V m ✓ O r 6 =✓ P r.c O � = = a � ZA d•°pv cqc 9 —uicc �i y c �LUY ✓ J Lri V71 V v � e ✓ b q r� V C � �� ^ p 6 b `p- "� ✓p a L q� JL rJ 6 O.Jq^ G ai `�O gq4 O �..• V r E �] 9 N L bN •^Cq N 4vu �+ N C' d > w p6 J r r V NG N C O L r 6V NI y q_ a°i q N ° q L m O M 9 i J r q G d J d ` E E 4 .Y. U T - •L• CL V •V ✓p � O M N T c10 y y CL � 6 ✓ FV ON °N > C LY �� 6M Yi LJ••yC iqa °✓ '" V t 6 T V_ v V C N L ^^ T N N C d d 6 L J y qO - N u O q /J P O 94 a0 9p ✓_ O C O+ y l T a N N O P M Y P O 4° N r '+ �✓ o u " ✓ r = a✓ „ C C c r „ ° c v° Y D V p ° .L. a r 0= > r L L L° v° O Ip �Cj v ✓ °� •^• •`• o E d T " q t`° 1� c i c v N A � C G w^ � V d° 9 t 6 U V a x •' P � u C 4 L 6 IZp C V .'• .: p _ m O V✓ � O N " 9 G= i u f_ q C w � V f � v a y V V N V ° 9 d I d P O L P O L d° W d E N F L L d +^ q a V q C= N > v✓° O y •� _ q °OL ° 0 °rIV6q 6 E O C u 9a V a �C 60 NC 06 P6 °r 9 Vet ^ O l` r4•LC r ✓Gq q 4Y> 60w M CN r do G. tr 1]—CO 4 4 aL p 4 r iuT L O✓ •Vj� yP M- T✓ �b +�9V 6V °.A. . J C P 0 9 1' 6 u v d r_ N C O G G l C C N I V° ^ G C� Gry rG NW ,{v. lsq .Li Q y w F qV ^Nd .22 E. M� r s l $`��P Vy c q 'i ^Or L` a O ✓^ ` °� n°ce CN 4r it .Vnmcs p� uVi r{ "rcVO ✓Vz..' t^ 9 r d j C r d v S g V 9 E d V d C `. T 6 w .m.• V l q r= T v ✓ C q ° D P l p G V L = . Z V O° > L V C C G ° q r C 4 O y'• ° O A L 9 .Ln d C 21 V O V O A q ° d° L Y r G V 4 V A Y° Fes. V 9 A L > L P -10 L Z v v v a 6 u L L P r U •Ga 9 ^ 9 . V J g 0 V', O N V w N d V Y O u 6 v^ 6r• Np 6q NO h 6w YGi�L2 �-Z wwq- ✓r HY V ^ J qaL NS•L+ �u�V rl�'4LG m t T tJ G t 9 ^ O O� O � C c 9 v C S V t p N y✓ d J o oz G V_ u W rmi � � d � ° L Z > ° O Fr' W C v S L A V w 0 H c O P V Y O C ° Z d w N p r q T q V G v O C O b 6 N V M p C a N O E O a V e v ^ 0 FyC O L ° z z 0 O O� " T " O � S C C t C V P q V N y u• a ° V° 4 OJ Y 4 C= u O> •^V Jq �pL C >? NLO O d A 9 ✓ O _°b� < _J W1 ZZ v ✓ P Nc Oa c N >�y0 FO �C9 NCB VO .Ln � 9`F J� a L O �•1 O � N C d 9 y d jJl � V m ✓ O r 6 =✓ P i C� OVV O l = a YG ZA J ai q G c �LUY ✓ J V71 V O b A A O 62 w p6 J r r V NG N C O L r 6V NI y t rl T t 9 C P O� O � C c 9 v C S V t p N y✓ d C oz u L G V w 0 H c O P V Y O 9 w N q T q V G v O C O b 6 N V M p O E O a D •J e A O FyC O L O O� " " °_ O S C C N 9 C V P q V N y u• G° r V>� V° 4 OJ 4 C= u O> •^V Jq �pL C >? NLO O d A 9 ✓ O _°b� _J ZZ v q= P Nc Oa OY >�y0 FO �C9 NCB VO .Ln � 9`F J� a L V d�> N C V 9 y d .✓... O C Y ✓ O r 6 =✓ P i C� OVV O l = V 9 YG ZA OVO ai lyC 06 �LUY ✓ J ^ ^7, G r r V NG V> O L CV ✓y °� y q_ a°i q N 9 L m O M c' ur ✓ C^ > S .Lr. G.L.• G d o 0 o E c E E 4 .Y. U T - •L• CL V •V ✓p � O M N T c10 Nr.d y CL � 6 ✓ FV ON °N > V L LY �� 6M LJ••yC iqa =..r V C COS L ^^ qO - q° /J P O O p A O C O D ✓_ O C O+ N l T a N N O P M Y P O L q V d L O V �✓ u " = „ C C M V r G > r ✓ G t V V q O N T^ V q 0 9 ^ f N P9 G w^ N O G i� O 9 9 v q q O O O. ✓ � l L C V .'• .: p _ m O V✓ LVG r v N ^^ 9 G= i u f_ q C w � V f G� a y �> O O L � C v S• C c L ^ C� 9 f>. __ _ r. 6 `L•V Q O Cc LL G �` P6 °.vim O Vet Y• >N <V 6�q ✓.� 4Y> 60w M CN r rl _1 Y °Q V . C> r "' +' 3 ✓ � Lr l r 1 � y C✓ p r r 4 ✓r c O O G `q y 6 Oq 6 � cV `J r_L. I¢�` ✓� �� 00 r '� ✓ Q I C O r � 4A ��'^Vr -uL 0 - y,}ih _ � V _= U"-. u .0 ✓ q t O r y v 0. 1 Q L^ O' ✓° ✓ L r r ^ V q O L q v r. r V 4_ O O q ✓ O y q U✓ q >✓ V _Q _U _d P lu.°+L _ 1 -r tyre 9p Iq' r V n`Q. G3 G P -"rS CrAdc q CVO A� ...• On VOV V O _ M C G� q i O� � I r �" _J � Q v r � � q C C L W• r J V c C N c V =q L .L..a u uQL r a ° � � c—°I .•q o ...rrA._:: � rr i�� r r Y � rC1n r•JLr✓ •rn � LL d y U Y I� YY Od y d IJ 1 N- `� ✓ Y u d O L .. rG�° �^ T O ? G L L _. � q L I � V QGj✓ OO 9 6 � .r O J✓ p J M i� L g E O ✓ O q L r r V L y L c L ` U Q L Q c d C° w ... t _V r u _°. C COSH L- V ✓ L l 'O u. .'J 6 Y w ° �_p � C r✓ J > a 6 i 6 =� ' [] O` G- In C.aO cQ ¢ C ¢E ^ JL°C ✓ t nJ� ray LIr .Li ITU c y VTr `TO cc c ".` Gp� I�4`.' E' c°G� au�G •. r V C r y � r C U✓ r t ` N O✓ O q y✓ C r C C C� •9 q q V P� r O ID C M d- [ r O GI� - u .O.r ^2 T� _C q. E y 6 Nr 620 Hq t• °V = <Lm � On C� ° r 8fi =�_Trd ti6.v N N Iq ' I i o c _ d d P iw Lq G.n JF - O L C Y C 1r V L ✓ O p� 1 G 2 V O p .M I ^- 6� r R O° _ L� O� � O G� d O r✓ Y y C N O O P^ °p �� - E� ^oq dy- Q d 1 os nd�q -_o °' °� =n✓ T Ana — q I°+— I.o` F r q d q✓ G 3 � C C L V 3� 1 - N • U G d• y p � C y� r L C'G ° O p1 O - d O L d d° = M q V V L A V q v ..Tr y n 0 d r O r •^ y= 6 w _ O J[ 9 L S52 ✓� r V u "_ ao Y o+ ��q°�Ti: a ✓$ LS �w°1PQO °O rc 4p m «K d J `ac JL 4,r G.°` L✓ 9 q O � c C G ✓ A t O 6 r L q 4 u E� r ✓� L Q� t O= V S _c _ .Lr..Li VQ Fr y n r - d am .V!! YL � O✓ CIV ° E E V � ✓ c 01 Nl �' O O ^F - N1q C W A ��` O° y T 0✓ C V d 0 Y 9 .01 r _ CqC 6d U✓L may' C 6`q Ly qR� QG Q GR � �� C.-.. ` «6q d ^ .-i. ✓ Orq� iEC �� `Cr Pl1Q Y� c VCO qq ° tt Q A :5 T � EC✓ 7-2 y r >vL o R a qO i r cc � z Svd. ° O S i y PO °NV P EL �y L Oq Gd ✓C1C.r °Q G> qV rgLVr. M rl G Q [Yd L q�Ll� GrN Oy AS rudE6 ✓Oqy Cam- qC r v L✓ c - ° C i 65 y d✓ L G C O y L ^ q ✓^ ? C C �° w Lq l O O i q y = = o r O r V OZ T° y _r c r • c _C _V _ 01 N C g V w u q Q b V r V r >_ F 7 E✓�O y d == w qe'r .Oi. r< 3 = � r ✓ � . Q � .G- . � � " � ^ o o A � O ` r o• s o — v � r � _ Q � — _"°. P A a CQ ✓� J O C ] T d � � O _P C° 6 y r r `_ 4 � °nc n m °O T e q T i.A M g _ — c d r° Oyd•,G n _ Q s_ G. C.y L °q.°♦ '� •4 «L ��Q°qL °e v d. ycb T- ily dd � Y4rN ` c G P]w w�cr �a - c P�qc nyG +d✓ cr°.. O.Nd J P V� ed ✓G �� ✓°OV - C 9C OL- Q L Gy. r G L y ` < u G W G 6 O r i,2 .9,5-,s < A L 4 P -Oz r r O N \ 0 d V d r u• E O✓ rJ C L L .n E H O C OL u � 2Z.�i• 4 2 - N 7 N N .0.. q G G O =^ F O L C O• •Vi. O C ry.q rLS OC °LC o uc o`er 0 cow '^ "icL 7 V _ -- ICE GLrL =' q^ i 4 CV O_ r iVU —MCV �J^ uVOV T r '15 21 7`OL °E Oq �C�L O�•r7 yp `i �VrpcC1 O, CPFr rY G 4J agGOy.o. ov= 7 -fry 64=0 CO�C OOT G ttj o= 3_✓ G ` yCr inN ui =0 N �C (7I 4 V O O u O b L q r N L C q 4 L d L C _V q V 2 C 2> O 7 O g C V O G 13Z ;c u ` ^_JO i.Vi .Oi.cN� T •nGpgq E d06 j L V L r O V d r u r N L O N C O= c 7 NN A m P yO rl C o� G N W C C C 000 u u u q Ac qc A A 9 9 V u L q C P' u r L✓ r d -N '29 G O O C r9 U ^ � u = T ✓ q PV_ -TJ _yT NaG q NO � l rJ V M r •Cp V A q ✓ O V� .4. O ^ O r W •C O P^ V L C G � �__ V^ C C` ✓ L L �.r(IV V -C rVir N L P NPR u roa ��m r ✓ J ^ L 6 C i 1r T S J O 4�� u O � � �GV L ^� csao.La Cr °a_c � � Lfi cv F 4 w a V V ^�N ^ C q ✓ L O E4o or `.. o�uc a N O = V r.. � u ^ ✓ 4 u __ q✓ O 4 O T l' q J= 4 � N w Pr q ^ 4 CN N AVG cgTN qE CC L V V` ✓ l . N •.. 6 N C.-d TALC N04 d d NV .�q0 �Yj V_u r-�q0 6Mwr G 7LO 6rJ070 .07V N CV CEO V V Y N N I q d b oa _PSC `J •n L L l r P L L 2 L C 9Py � G C V L � O N 9 L `n I N7L 4 y N c -u 6 O d V M L c b ip r 4 4 .n q 9 L L � V 7 — °c c7 X70 YL � VO �n r•" =o 6L 4p• �p w°N y9 ZO V O 2 d c L vc zo . V V V 7 4v a V6 L q G y ^ r N i Nr l N yP L P V N N, .' -vre:,; U • •rVG a a N N � �-LO•N . .� V V . .iN= _ _JwJ 0 06 9 9VN ^q 3 3 Lc J LN1Z L JCL u O O t t O V L . PO T T! L L L N q 0 ` u � P u r r V V V O O O .4.r L f✓ C C .0.. u P V P _ ` V u 0 2 _ _ • i C M V uO_ V Vq ^•rC � _ .�. p p G V C= 6 60l P P4N P P9q . .Vi��TN u �V u uPOGq 3 V 4 4 4 4G O O u u J CadN L L ^�V � 3 qPC � 9P ' V y y`' q qpC ° NC� i iC'C CC V V = =p. y y C 7 7 O O O V V O O ^ ^ l ^ ^ J J q q q O O q C • •r0 q Ty u 2 2,- 2 2 Gm LTD a a.L. A A. a an. v v c °Q - -�V G G>^ r r.'• VJ G cr^ ° C.S a ada . 94 L Lam° y yN✓gq q .T..q..' E E C .Ln 9 q`.L. q°6V _L`o q t u L M tiCi u > >• M C d !PT u LT Oq = _^ „ „LC N rTr 4 4L.°ut C •L0q ! ui d dd O O =°d _ d N N M NC r O A . O N C G G° b✓ r 1 1 a n M O O 4 4 O O •.p. N n r r c c^ v v b b P P or u u�c N °• ` `-� V s.T. g ^= t ter. ° °qL r ague i NNNOiy7 ° V L L.N. g c ^ r a icy - -C P PE C A A al a No m °q � �°�° ✓ rN_ � ��o a a ✓o�o` L L+ a a m ° ✓ r �o.o. i i >C.L.c � uVLP O yT N 9 Q Oq q q� P PEC E E r r 4 6 6VV � �O�l ° °•;E O O°•q CrlL V V J JI y N Q V O A r PVNE O L ` CSC P✓ N NO O OL C CPS J J ° ° �r0 6 6,°p'4 C Ci 00 � �7r P O L `A `OT u u . .a o✓ r q V • p q q J J � � _ q V q C C P q V PO b � p _V V OOV 4 4N 6 6 r r•O < < q q L Lf V V O O 4 4 � � N N 0 00 O ON C �'a _ � C V p p 2Z.�i• 4 2 - N 7 N N .0.. q G G O =^ F O L C O• •Vi. O C ry.q rLS OC °LC o uc o`er 0 cow '^ "icL 7 V _ -- ICE GLrL =' q^ i 4 CV O_ r iVU —MCV �J^ uVOV T r '15 21 7`OL °E Oq �C�L O�•r7 yp `i �VrpcC1 O, CPFr rY G 4J agGOy.o. ov= 7 -fry 64=0 CO�C OOT G ttj o= 3_✓ G ` yCr inN ui =0 N �C (7I 4 V O O u O b L q r N L C q 4 L d L C _V q V 2 C 2> O 7 O g C V O G 13Z ;c u ` ^_JO i.Vi .Oi.cN� T •nGpgq E d06 j L V L r O V d r u r N L O N C O= c 7 NN A m P yO rl C o� G N W C C C 000 u u u q Ac qc A A 9 9 V u L q C P' u r L✓ r d -N '29 G O O C r9 U ^ � u = T ✓ q PV_ -TJ _yT NaG q NO � l rJ V M r •Cp V A q ✓ O V� .4. O ^ O r W •C O P^ V L C G � �__ V^ C C` ✓ L L �.r(IV V -C rVir N L P NPR u roa ��m r ✓ J ^ L 6 C i 1r T S J O 4�� u O � � �GV L ^� csao.La Cr °a_c � � Lfi cv F 4 w a V V ^�N ^ C q ✓ L O E4o or `.. o�uc a N O = V r.. � u ^ ✓ 4 u __ q✓ O 4 O T l' q J= 4 � N w Pr q ^ 4 CN N AVG cgTN qE CC L V V` ✓ l . N •.. 6 N C.-d TALC N04 d d NV .�q0 �Yj V_u r-�q0 6Mwr G 7LO 6rJ070 .07V N CV CEO V V Y N N I q d b oa _PSC `J •n L L l r P L L 2 L C 9Py � G C V L � O N 9 L `n I N7L 4 y N c -u 6 O d V M L c b ip r 4 4 .n q 9 L L � V 7 — °c c7 X70 YL � VO �n r•" =o 6L 4p• �p w°N y9 ZO V O 2 d c L vc zo . V V V 7 4v a V6 L q G y ^ r N i Nr l N yP L P V N N, .' -vre:,; o� G N W C C C 000 u u u q Ac qc A A 9 9 V u L q C P' u r L✓ r d -N '29 G O O C r9 U ^ � u = T ✓ q PV_ -TJ _yT NaG q NO � l rJ V M r •Cp V A q ✓ O V� .4. O ^ O r W •C O P^ V L C G � �__ V^ C C` ✓ L L �.r(IV V -C rVir N L P NPR u roa ��m r ✓ J ^ L 6 C i 1r T S J O 4�� u O � � �GV L ^� csao.La Cr °a_c � � Lfi cv F 4 w a V V ^�N ^ C q ✓ L O E4o or `.. o�uc a N O = V r.. � u ^ ✓ 4 u __ q✓ O 4 O T l' q J= 4 � N w Pr q ^ 4 CN N AVG cgTN qE CC L V V` ✓ l . N •.. 6 N C.-d TALC N04 d d NV .�q0 �Yj V_u r-�q0 6Mwr G 7LO 6rJ070 .07V N CV CEO V V Y N N I q d b oa _PSC `J •n L L l r P L L 2 L C 9Py � G C V L � O N 9 L `n I N7L 4 y N c -u 6 O d V M L c b ip r 4 4 .n q 9 L L � V 7 — °c c7 X70 YL � VO �n r•" =o 6L 4p• �p w°N y9 ZO V O 2 d c L vc zo . V V V 7 4v a V6 L q G y ^ r N i Nr l N yP L P V N N, .' -vre:,; V V Y N N I q d b oa _PSC `J •n L L l r P L L 2 L C 9Py � G C V L � O N 9 L `n I N7L 4 y N c -u 6 O d V M L c b ip r 4 4 .n q 9 L L � V 7 — °c c7 X70 YL � VO �n r•" =o 6L 4p• �p w°N y9 ZO V O 2 d c L vc zo . V V V 7 4v a V6 L q G y ^ r N i Nr l N yP L P V N N, .' -vre:,; a 0 6 C '3 u✓ � O I y< OV n 1 G` ` V O c ✓ G _r 9 VN n� 4V �� L I _ ro= ` O q oc —° I .'''" c.`• 003 �1+ic pps °.• °W .`> ;� °' oT n N+J O O c « AWL 'S �.°.• ->urt 117 G S iaV d0V_ y Pb = _ Cr w. =G G j J Ol = `LV S ]) NL �9 �•. y ` uIVJ V 7L✓ 4 OL�EDC� I LLL OU S Uu � ✓� � I 'CG _r �' � V r Ic u l L. C ✓ ✓�'V _ Z` O Gd •ten '..°i r r- ter.• c d 900 �F L>Vu V` � � LV� CV .� O ✓ 0 0' WL. b — .� o '',, � r n- �.. ✓�.`_ �� —%a" .u. u ..� `cal c''GCO oo r Dq L V C 'y � cO� �' d C ? � + V 4 •e M= u VG :Y�Zn ^i V 9 i 6 p Jror • d L .O.•✓ y �+ a o.'. yJ L cu �n gcpc n✓n !\q- � tc a_ ry - ` Cn GP ``o L � q— `oi `P G O V� 1 S L ✓ 9V - a —\ - � J P V r � L coq y� G � •� L dp .i .uo im d D IiN� J�^ � S N 9 aL oa `� Ir ✓L +L' •`° y A� off_ ° �� o °D — �G aC�C W_ O OV�<u ''1 N 07 Oq D D i O t9✓ b —� dL V L •_O G.. -FJ .e —ro N ➢L d . L l V .— P V I I' 4 L L C C — V V b✓ — C a 'E V C -- ( O �' O 4 J b a %2!9. L n- 9 O. l� YYYYYYO .... ` 9 Z> N` 9 � = n Y C /� •+ Q L P J✓ U_ t V r n N 9 N V M' 9 —�� O� q9 O �C+ 4C ro T+ �� +J '_ ✓ S r ' Q u ro u 0 V, V w. � J N U L+ G t C� L d 0 _ W ri✓ {{ i P L N W/ L L T a v L O� r— ^°'•- -� V r b C C L� i C l G O 6 9 y< J 'y � N V ± I � j— L j G -� i 4 V 9 <�< O ' J r O _ r w• u 6 6 N � uJ. S n .� r✓ G N 6 (� � N 4 J p Y J C V 00 ✓ c G. z � O as N 9i I�.1 ! oy.` C —✓C « 6 a o � L CYgC N P TP 9 Oi ror L' � N P� � a == � ✓✓ c d L d— ✓ d r N d V P a M = W O O C` � n Y y ` � 4 y •_ T 9 C G ✓✓ O J P O V = •°r V � C✓ H O 'p° •Li• °•= m ¢� `c� o— `o.—L` 4 ob - r ro° `°o• —J Wv .L4 i •Ni.i ` P ✓ _ _— b _L F— ✓•o ✓P L o a` s- cL a ou Juc coo m= io _2 rn%u ✓ f Di-o .T•- —moo a �o `d i c u— I � a rG� ✓ —O �` � J ✓D � 94 Ld >�V Ja •C N� 49 V Cum 1 O C.O.r LQV d� > � 2` I �OC D� _ T �•4�V � _L l T L+ T V .nLV`•N 4 S° a aGJ ' 6 ✓ N L C O 1 r L V✓ O M O V f .r0 y qO r _J P _ V� L I E.G ro +rL LC W ° 4C4 `n c ��1 E ✓L (� V L✓ ZV DP E�— 1 `rq G 9VO _V V N PQLCT O ✓ L V l « ~— 6GIQ C L°, r c J DS` ••°. L .0 O V T pNC CLn 1 O L q q M Cr✓` L � � C 6V� P+ P NO _ «G. .N..O T•_ `� -YO 9V a �W� O —i NOC �r b NSA P� v qy� ��V G✓ C tG v9 �' ✓ S G 9 .^ _r N� l `C1 LNDa]✓ •Li.L� ✓✓ .Vi• q u V ^ q V V P D S � L q r O> l n V O C F` ` L V -- L Z O —_ t ✓ co PS• O � ` Li L YOO `t—J i u c cc L O N ✓ 9 VL 1 _.✓W Nn �4L c w.0 a ro OGL �L P �W� cc LN UOa rv� o eo s_ .�_ ✓Z P ` E4 ry c i �o.F: Ly'•yaO o.a �= -°' a c + c ce � 2! L ZZC Ar. `� LuL .✓ ✓t e4yn .^ vb Y ✓¢4 `L> LL ,G «u I am c LL «✓ 1`• cE gnu :'`qy ° ✓.'•rJi _.T.N �•��N sc + i v E� 1 •.�� ✓TE —s �� WI � I V :y ti n u n�i E _ ov' e--�a ✓� -i 9 q ✓ceoW v o Yj L+ s`T�io1 CiO L.�J NV W6 q U ✓ V O 9 N {� VL Q q r vu N� y e �a o„ q G r x O V d J. G > n^ O C 6a 4<T. a O O ✓ c� L -� > O L = u C N F u ` O _ j G 9 � � y IEI- E LO ✓ «dN � �i ° tea°, c c � W p C✓ w � ^� a 9 C V p r U O q O N r 4 � v c V f✓ �O.r d d aT� C i y a O C r C O 6 m ✓ _ .Ln S � c v cO C r v _r � � w Y✓ N W d I� ✓1 Vp`y ON fJ 6 00 `Ni CCL9 V✓ � O �� r ] r C� .n O ✓YCnO.r L � 9P C GO O✓ C q LCC� 4 t N�u901 uc�re � Ou wq DUCE o> � \"� � q v Q .� O l = ✓j.'l O i O N y C J P d O C✓ N IO EL _u L.nO C. ^ O. °QC� gTaC +I V9 Y W E W • f_� O q y °� � �_ e C s O� c i '� 6 m V O a✓ W �� e L �I °4 y 9 9 V 9 U W y V V✓ u✓ W q =�✓ V C IEI- E LO 0 :7 RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81 -18 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 61.0219(0)83 of the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission previously approved the above - described project. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following in ings: A. That prevailing economic conditions and interest rates have caused a distre,sed market climate for this project. B. That the current construction activity makes it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extensTiE or: Project Expiration CUP 81 -18 July 13, 1984 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: — Herman Rempel, Lhairman ATTEST: Secretary of t e P arming Commission Resolution No. Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fcregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the ?lanning Commission o held City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning on the 8th day o. June, 1983, by 9 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 8, 1983 1977 TO: Members of the Planning Commission. FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSIONS - TENTATIVE TRACTS 10046, p 47, g 6 25 AND 663 BACKGROUND: The applicants for the above residential projects are requesting time extensions. The requests are based on the current economic conditions adversely affecting the building industry, lending market, and phasing plans. Of the six tentative tracts, only 11663 by Narlb-orough Development Company is moving ahead at this time. A portion of Tentative Tract 11663 has already been recorded and model homes constructed. However, a time extension is still required because State law requires that all areas within a tentative map record prior to the expiration date. The approved mans are shown on the attached exhibits. Listed below is i`= '-'n'`- type, number of units, approval date and expiration date for each project. Tract No. # of Units --247— Unit Type A roval Date Ex irat' Da - 10047 43 SF 12 -22 -80 10349 58 SF SF 1 -14 -81 12 -10 -80 _ - 3 11563 11625 12 102 Condo 1 -28 -81 3-28-83 6 -20 -83 11663 383 TH /Condo 6 -10 -81 A4AL'fSIS: Tentative Tract Maps in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are currently valid for a maximum of four years (48 months), with app ^opriate extensions per Subdivision Ordinance regalltis Tracts 10016, 10047, 10349, 11563, and 11625 were originally approved twelve months, subsequeW'., _.-anted eighteen -month extensions, and are now eligible for a final e` Steen -month extension. Tract 11663 was approved for twenty -four moncns and is eligible for the first of two possible twelve -month extensions. ITEM B Request for Time Extensions Planning Commission Agenda June 8, 1983 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Based on past Planning Commission policy, it is recomYnende that a twelve (12) month extension be Granted for fract 11663 and that the final eighteen (18) month extension be granted for the remaining tracts. The rew expiration dates are shown on the attached Resolution. .espltful ly Ri 6dmezb Ci v P anner C3:jr achments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibits "B" through "G" - Tract Maps and Conditions of Approval Resolution of Approval 11 r-1 L] VICINITY MAP City Limits Unincorporated Area Within Citv Sphere of Influence E 3SRi / r� 1 ! ..m : a Illp I ..•� v f _ 1 1 1Fics TENTATIVE IW.AP TRACT N0 _ t ® ®46 • ::;:.:o y_;. — - -ice_- 1.- .JE ~- _ _ CITY OF rrEx1 --rh,6 -- ,sz,46 RANCHO CUCAN'IGN-GA -r PLAINMIN ; DPvrT,SnN EXHIBIT. 8 -F SCALE- — RESOLUTION NO. 80 -85 r A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CONLMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10046. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10046, hereinafter "Map" sub=mitted by The Anden Group, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a tract subdivision on 18.9 acrss in the R -1 -20 zone located on the north side of Hillside, west of Hermosa - APN 201 - 082 -03 and 04 into 27 lots, regularly cam before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on December 22, 1980; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTIOr 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10046 and the Map thereof: (a� The tentative tract is consistent with ail applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed generai and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public nealtr; problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract wi ?1 not conflict with any easement, acquired by the public at laige, now of ecord, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. COK( b 2; i C Page 2 .tVM (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts or the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10046, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Engineerinq Division 1. At the time of underground utility installation and prior to installation of street improvements, the developer shall contact the appropriate cable television company for the area and make arrangements which would give the company the opportunity to install cable at the time of trenching. If the cable television company does not install cable, then the developer shall install conduit and pull boxes throughout the tract. Such details stall be shown and verified on the improvement plans. 2. Master plarred stormdrain shall be required as follows: a. Design and construction, of an adequate concrete lined channel over Alta Loma drainage course from the north tract boundary to the south edge of Hillside Drive sha7i be required. b. The length of the Hillside Drive crossing of the channel shall be based on master planned street width, and shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and San Bernardino County Flood Control District. C. Inlet structures at north tract boundary and an outlet transition structure at end of street crossing shall be required. The outlet structure shall be adequately designed to protect the downstream end of the existing channel from erosion and overflow. d. An improved drainage facility or a part of the master planned stormdrain shall be provided within San Bernardino County Flood Control District drainage easement at north tract boundary unless a waiver of this requirement is cbtaired by the applicant from the Flood Contrr)l District. e. The existing 80 foot wide drainage easement within the subject tract shall be dedicated in fee to the Flood Control District. t co�j fo 1] Resolution No 8U -85 Page 3 s)l C ® •F. The design and improvements of the storm drain facilities shall be done in conformance with the Flood Control District's standards and speJ fications and to the satisfaction of the City Engireer. Approval and permits for the storm drain construction shall be obtained from the Flood Control District. g, Reconstruction of Hillside Drive shall be required on the approaches to the required channel crossing. A 26' -wide pavement shall be provider ror the approaches with a profile to match the ultimate c;°sign of the street. h. The cost of constructing the storm drain facilities shall be credited to the stormdrain fee for the project and a reimbursement agreement will be executed per Section 8 nf cne City Ordinance No. 75 to cover the contr5l,ations which exceed the amount of the fee. 7. Existing City road requiring reconstruction, shall remain open for traffic at all times with adequate detours during actual construction. A cash deposit shall be required to cover the cost of the grading and paving, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the cash deposit shall be refunded. _ Lf i. -,he cost of constructing Hillside channel crossing including reconstruction of approaches shall be credited to the system development fee for this project A reimbursement agreement, at_ the discretion of the (.ity Council, may be executed to cover the cost of the construction which exceeds the fee amount. 3. A pr'.vate off -site drainage easement shall be required to convey drainage from any lot to the proposed channel through private properties. 4. All existing easements lying within the future right -of- way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City Engineer's requirements, prior t-1 recordation of the tract map. 5. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any existing utility facility that would affect construction. 5. Conczntrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed -to City standards. 7. Existing City road requiring reconstruction, shall remain open for traffic at all times with adequate detours during actual construction. A cash deposit shall be required to cover the cost of the grading and paving, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the cash deposit shall be refunded. _ Lf / 8. Adequate provisions disposal of surface adjacent areas. shall be made for acceptance and drainage entering the property from 9. Letters of acceptance from downstream property owners shall be required where runoff from the tract flows onto private properties. 10. Private drainage easements with improvements for cross lnt drainage shall be .vquired and shall be delineated on the final map. 11. A11 interior streets within this subdivision shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The location of such sidewalks shall be shown on the Final Map and shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to recordation. 12. Prior to Final Map recordation, the feasibility of Hillside Rd. redesign shall be investigated to provide adequate space for sidewalk and other improvements within Hillside Rd. parkways. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 1980. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by t5e Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commissior, held on the 22nd day of December, 1980 by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASS_f:T: COMMISSIONERS King, Rempel, Sceranka, Dahl None Toistoy 1 ao� 6 L17. u DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject: Applicant- Location: 1Je�ze! '`✓ITJ: C7LIf.�L i�1rS7 �F•vb5� Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICA`;? SMALL CO °JTACT THE a' A^1NINr DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE ':JIT i THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sectirns of the Zoning Ordinance ana all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. V c. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation — — Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to city standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. J 7. If dwellings are tc be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Plarning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. S. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division `or review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. g. All roof appurtenances, integrated, shielded fro and streets as required 10. Prior to ary use of "_he thereon, all conditions the satisfaction of she 11 including air conditioners, shall be architecturally ;m view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties by the Planning and Building Divisions. project site or business activity being cocmnenced of approval contained herein shall be completed to Director of Community Development. i w4q eo _ 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adverse3y affect adjacent properties. _ 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of init :a' development shall be solar heated. _ 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulatior aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect & ellings with open spaces and recreational uses. _ 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. _ 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. _ 16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 17. Solid core exterior doors, secu *ity dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit. 19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, viletless appliances, etc. _ 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. L,"' 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. V" 24. This tract shall form ur annex tc a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. to��� LA 11 V 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building perrnits and occupancy of the units. B_ - Parking and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 8. The C.C. & R.'s shaft restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. Landscaoinq C", _ I. A detailed landscape and irrigc:tion plan shall be.submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 1/` 2_ Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of -- existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. t0o�lo 1j_a 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and toppad at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved -;3r removal may be required to be replaced on a tree- for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street -eas for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. _ 5. A minimum of 50 tees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20" -24" box or iarger, 70% -15 gallor, and 10 % -5 gallon. 6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required 'landscape plans and shall to subject to approval bN: the Planning Divis:on. 11. A minimum of specimen size i:rees shall be planted within the project. 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleiviai rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along i3 -9 D. Signs 1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinancp, and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. 3. The signs indicated or. the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Approvals Required 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract Nu. is granted subject to the apr�oval of Zone Change and /or Variance /Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of - month(s) at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional use Permit. i/` 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a pri -ate or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract , on , I have ;ead the C_C_ & R.'s and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the pur• +se of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to -)ccupancy. !/4 6. 'rior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of ")uilding permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification Srom all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of C.ommun;ty Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B -la tl 7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development_ Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. isr S. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Ccmmission. _V'* 9. This subdivision was not submitted as a totai development package and is required to reapply for a pint rating relative to the design section o` the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVIS1OM FOR COMPLIANCE WITH lHE FOLLOWIWG CONDITIONS: F. Site Development ✓° 1. The applicant shali comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible coastr-uction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. V' 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rat. -. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. _ 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applican,� shall pay ,jeveiopment fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 5. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. 6. Street nac,as and addresses shall be provided by the building official. 1� {!0 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and r:on- combustible roof material. 8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ons where appropriate.- G. Existinc Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Unifor�; Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire- resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demoiished. r/' 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Grading. v I. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the app,-oved conceptual grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. Leo 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision reap or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CCN7DITTON:S: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all nEcessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: _additional feet oni/ additional feet on additional feet on t Op'{ ro f 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will k- for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. J. Street Improvements I. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. V1 Z. Construct the foliowing missing improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. I PVMT. SIDE- J WALK DRIVE I STREET APPR. LIGH':S A.C. I OVEP,LA'; WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS OTHER lyIL5 fl .6iiv 5N .a V3. Prior to any a:ork being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. V/ 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 5. Sur_ty shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction OT the Ciiy Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to re- :ording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. t% 6. All street improvements shali be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. to t COLT 0 Z - 0--7 K. Drainage and Fiood Control !% 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: 3. Th? proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions of the prograo, and City Ordinance No. 24. f 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street, ca Tp EX(s7"k1 ui..rrc!- ( ut • sw— 4-st N 4 FABr TR°r-T ��✓ % 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection wails, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. 6. Condition K -4, above, may be reduced, at tha discretion of the City Engineer if adjacent development precludes the need for any portion of the mall. L. Utilities ;fl. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials Tess than 12 KV. 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving -- utieity companies and the City Engineer. ✓ 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. V 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. L/ 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. M. General P.eauarements and Aoprovals V 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: 6_ County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) _sLC. San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Other: ;` g-' q i M- _ 2. A copy of the "ovenants, Conditicns and 'pstrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeormers Association, subject to tihe approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. _ 3. Prior to recordation, a Rotirs of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be file4 with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. 4. Final parcel and trac_ naps shall conforr to City standards and procedures. {;c C� r. I 1 i _ rn r TRACT NO_. 10047 � -_ �J< � � � _-_ �• -_:_ f'. `la •Ir.. � � url0 � A 1 .�...:r . �:r.� -.«. .ear.- • `..'__ I,i �I I ; - �.,r _ -''" ri •� Jam- - .l.- '��- {jTT�- .�_, ....• —� �. -� Pik:•.• r'� r•r• -r •.Lr+. �— !�—•�• '�� M 1 /�. INORTH -earl AI CIT -Y OF iTEa i_ rN f i`i I Get—% RANCHO CL;CANI®I'GA -•I-eocr TITLE= n nf? PLE IMMING DIXISi�Jt'�1 EXHIBIT. SCALE- RES(- .UTION NO. 8C -86 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNTNr_ COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITI;NALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT. MAP NO. 10047. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10047, hereinafter "Map" submitted by The Anden Group, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a tract subdivision on 27.2 acres in the R -1 -20 zone, located on the south side of Hillside, west of Hermosa - APN 201 - 083 -41 into 43 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and actior. en December 22, 1980; and WHEREAS, the City Planner subject to all conditions set forth Divisions reports; and has recomrended approval . of the Map in the Engineering and Planning WHEREAS, the Planning Commission ;ias read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and ►-:s considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEP.EFORE, the Planning Corms:ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as foilows: SECTION is The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10047 and the M ?p thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the tyre of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public 'iealth problems; (`) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of tha property within the proposed subdivision. I oc "4-T G- e:, E E 11 Resolution No. 80® Page 2 ! (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 1on47, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Enqineerinq Division 1. Master planned storm drain shali be required as follows: a. Design and construction of an adequate concrete lined channel over Alta Loma drainage course from south of Wilson Avenue to the north edge of Hillside Drive shall be required. b. The length of the Hillside Drive and Wilson Avenue crossings of the chanr,zl shall be based on master planned street widt;., and shall be designed to the satisfact�.,r. of the City Engineer and San Bernardino County Flood Control District. C. Inlet structures at north of Hillside Drive and an outlet transition structure at south of Wilscr- Avenue crossing shall be required. The outlet structure shall be adequately designed to protect the downstream end of the existing channel from erosion and overflow. d. The existing 8o foot wide drainage easement within the subject tract shall be dedicated in fee to the Flood Control District. e. The design and improvements of the storm: drain facilities shall be lone in conformance with the Flood Control Listri%;t's standards and specifications and to the satisfaction. of the City Engineer. Approval and permits for the storm drain construction s:iail be obtained from the Flood Control District. f. Reconstruction r' Hillside Drive and Wilson Avenue shall be required on the approaches to the required street crossings of Al-:a L:aa channel. A 26' wide pavement shall be provided for the approaches on Hillside Drive with a profile to match the ultimate design of the street. In addition to the required improvements cn Wilson Avenue contiguous to subject tract. The approaches to the channel crossing beyond the tract boundary shall be reconstructed to the existing width of the pave.. nt to match tie =.1*_imate profile of the street. t oo47 C--5 Resolution No. 80 -86 Page 3 g. The cost of constructing the storm drain faciiities shall be credited to the storm drain fee for the project and a reimbursement agreement will be executed per Section 8 of the City Ordinance No. 75 to cover the contributions which exceed the amount of the fee. The cost of constructing the channel crossings including the approach roads on Hillside Drive and Wilson Avenue shall be credited to the system development fee for the project except for that portion of half width Wilson Avenue approach road contiguous to the subject tract which shall be the responsibility of the applicant. A reimbursement agreement, at the discretion of the City Council, may be executed to cover the contribution which exceeds the fee amount, with a stipulation that the system development fees from the proposed tracts 11609 and 10046 shall be directly reimbursed as required to the applicant to cover the cost of construction. This reimbursement shall be made only after the system development fees are collected in connection with subdivision developments of the two tracts as mentioned hereinabove. 2. Adequate roll shall be provided on the tract access street at Hillside Drive is preclude flood flows entering the tract. 3. All existing easements lying within the future right -cf- way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City Engineer's requirement„ prior to recordation of the tract map. 4. Final plans and profiles sha'i show the location of any existing utility facility that would affect construction. 5. Concentrated 'rainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City standards. 6. Existing City road requiring reconstruction, shall remain open for traffic at all times with adequate detours during actual construction. A cash deposit shall be required to cover the cost of the grading and paving prior to recordation of the tract map. On completion of the gradi..g and paving, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the cash deposit shall be refun:�d. 7. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposai of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 8. Letters of acceptance from downstream property owners shall be required where runoff from the tract flows onto private properties. to0{ -1 G-4 11 0 Resolution No. 805 Page 4 9. Private drainage easements with improvements for cross lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated on the final map. 10. At the time of underground utility installation and prior to installation of street improvements, the developer shall contact the appropriate cable television company for the area and make arrangements which would give the company the opportunity to install cable at the time of trenching. If the cable television company does not install cable, then the developer shall install conduit and pull box ^s throughout the tract. Such details shall be shown and verified on the improvement plans. 11. All interior streets within this subdivision shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The location of such sidewalks shall be shorm on the Final Map and shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to recordation. 12. Prior to Final Map recordation, the feasibility of Hillside Road redesign shall be investigated to provide adequate space for sidewalk and other improvements within Hillside Road parkways. -- APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER„ 1980. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11-YA ATl I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, co hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was dulv and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cc- .Mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of December, 1980 by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CO;TMiSSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSI0aERS King, Rempel, Sceranka, Dahl None Tolstoy loci -7 G -S 0 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Subject: IF 1004- Applican Location STANDARD CONDITIONS Those items checked are conditions -of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTAC: THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLO::IN.r-. CONDITIONS: Site Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building penr.:ts. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreath Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. -Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be app roved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. B. A sample of tie :roof *.iaterial shall be submitted tc the Planning Division for re -tiew and aapro:,a, prior to issuance of building permits. t/ 9. Al-, roof appurtenance:., including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from v =ew and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as requited by the Planning and Building Divisions. 10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced -- thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 0 & rJ ABk 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, --cation, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial develcpmert shall be solar heated. 13. T.exturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. lz. All trash plc': p shall be fnr individual units with ail recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans shall he submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. • 16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. lg. Security devices such a-- window locks shall be installed on each unit. 19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. 20_ Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trai"is shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. V/ 2.1. this tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. 10014-7 e -7 AMA 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing ani /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the anits. Parking and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. 2. Parkin" lot trees shay, be a m,.nimum 15 gallon size. 3. All two -way aisle widtis shall be a minimum of 24 feet side. _ 4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and lear, a minimum of 14 feet wide dt all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 6. All units shall be provided with automat'c garage door openers. 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. _ 8. the C.C. b R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. _ 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. 8 R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. LandscaDina _ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 1,,-* 2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be completed `,y the developer. Said plan, shall take into account the Proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. 13 o0"­( -7 G -8 `J ✓ 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretior of the Planning Division during the review of the Easter Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. i/ 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shdll be installed in accordance with the Master Plan, of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70a -15 gallon, anc' 10 % -5 gallon. 6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, -- free from weeds, trash, and deb -is. L/ 7. All slope L_nks in access of five .15) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance wilt. slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prier to releasing occupancy f ^r those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lo, subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses LpuT1 completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Bi-ilding Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provideu to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. B. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be 1u.ly maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City pricr to issuance of building permits. 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subJect to approval by the Planning Division. 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. 12. Special :andscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size trees, and r:n abundance of landscaping is required along I coq-7 D. signs I. Any signs proposed for this development shall be desioned in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Grdinancc and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 2. A -,niform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Buiidinr permits. 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not ap?roved with this ap:,re)val and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Anorovais Required 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final ` subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract. No. is granted subject to the approval ` of Zone Change and /ov Variance /Cond: irmal Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at ` which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. (/ 5. The de, >loper is required to obtain t: following signed statement by pu°cha!>rs of hemes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adiz -.ent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot Tract , on I have read the C.C. & R.'s and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement fc- the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Saie statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. ge^ 6. Prier to appreiai and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of ` building permits, when no subdivision map 4s involved, written certification from a F aff :tee- Scher? Districts, shall Ice submitted to the Department of Communi'�:y Development which states that adequate schocl facilities are or will be capable of acconntodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certi-'i.:ation must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance cf permits in the case of all other residential projects. 0 y 7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter dust have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of.permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. r/ me null and void if the tentative subdivision map g. This approval shall beco is not approved and recordEi or building permits ofw this np ojects involved, within twelve (121 months from the app unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. �j g. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for point rating relative to the design, section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be dev - loped as tract homes. APPLICANT S;'ALL CONTACT THE BUILCING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WIT" THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Site D_ ev m''nt The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. 2, Prior to issuance of building permi *= for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. f 3, Prior to the issuance of a bu'',ding permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at tgeaetifbcatioa Fee, ParkcFee,eDr inagecFec,,Systems be limited to: City r Deveiopment Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. w 4.. Prio to the issuance of a building permit for P neti'r!E apGlicantrshall -payal devei.:ps:ent or addition to an existing development, $F development fees at the established rite. Such fees may include, but not O be limited te: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Pemmit acid Plan Lhecking Fees. 5 Tnis approvel shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. IS f 6 Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. tco�-7 G -� I G. H. -7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. B. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ors where appropriate. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building considering use, area and fire - resistiveness 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply Zoning regulations for the intended use or t 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be to comply with appropriate grading practices Code for property line clearances of existing buildings. with current Building and ie building shall be demolished. removed, filled and!or capped and the Uniform Plunbing Code. Gradin 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards ;,nd accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conca tual grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform sqch work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. V' 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. APPLICAVT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLL014ING CONDIT-OPS: I, pad:cF.tions and Jehicular Access �. Ded cations shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all np,�essa-y easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: 11 additional feet on 1014*?g dam, /aw additional feet on J14*9;fd additional feet on ( Doc(7 -rte I7 V 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. 4. All rights of vehi.:ular ingress to and egress from shell be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress L'nd internal circulation of any trucks proposed businessvery or Goods to the property or in the operation of th F, Street Improvements I. Construct full street improvements including, but rot limited to curb and trees and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, , treat yGfc 3 �1+�• Z WM& T lights on all interior streets. 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: CURB A.C. SIDE- DRIVE STREET A.C. WHEEL APPR. LIGHTS OVERLAY CHAIR RAMPS 07irR STREET NAME GUTTER PVT. WALK M kilZ�_ — - AL �s�Ic,SF j �.,�, b Y 3_ Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an eninoachme ` — permit and fees shall be obtained from he cy.y Engineer's addition to any other permits required. 4 Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a street improvements, Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all prior to issuance of an encroachment permit- 5 SLrety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the completion of the public -- C ty Engineer and tt:e City Attorney, guaranteeing the issuance of building irprovements, prior to recording of the map or peianits, whichever comes first. a/ 6. A1'. street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of t„e City - Engineer, prior to oc(jPancy. 7. Favement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. F, ,l L M. 1 Drainaqe and Flood Control V 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. intersection drains will be : equired at the following locations: 3. The proposed project fails within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the 4structures y diverting sheet t- street 0�[ 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or / landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. y 5. Condition K -4, above, may be reduced, at the discretion of the City Engineer, if adjacent development precludes the need for any portion of the mall. Utilities V 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed undergeound including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. ✓ 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the spccisication of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. ✓ 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. ✓ 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. I✓' 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of tiie Cucamonga County hater District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD -will be required prior to recordation. _ V E. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. General Recuirements and Approvals 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans °or: B. County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading pe L., C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Other: IOOri7 C- /`f 2. 3. 4. 11 `�I A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. _ Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. ioog7 G -15 _ T 2 i ran.:' x. P•4 .. n I `a r� ' •r ,• ==;` :!� �_ L'�, ` �, �-' , 5••� -r '`� • t � -tom"- � � I N K)R1 H CITY OF rr Elk 1: r�Gcr --m I c RAINCHO CLTCAx'IO.'G-k =L.E:��r M,kP FiAr NT TNNG DIVM.N E`CHIBIT. -D- -_ SCALE- i •411�� SITE A GRADING PLAN � ~� r A'C' .<•P TRACT NO 10349 _ ................. I ff Il � s� a• . i ran.:' x. P•4 .. n I `a r� ' •r ,• ==;` :!� �_ L'�, ` �, �-' , 5••� -r '`� • t � -tom"- � � I N K)R1 H CITY OF rr Elk 1: r�Gcr --m I c RAINCHO CLTCAx'IO.'G-k =L.E:��r M,kP FiAr NT TNNG DIVM.N E`CHIBIT. -D- -_ SCALE- i 11 L_•J E RESOLUTION NO. 81• -01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10349. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10349, hereinafter "Map" submitted by B & B Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a total development on 33.1 acres of land in the R -1 -20 zone, located on the west side of Sapphire Street between Rosebud Street and Vinmar Avenue - APN 1043 -121- 03, 1062 - 011 -03, 1062- 161 -01 into 58 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on January 14, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner subject to all conditions set forth Planning Department reports; and has recommended approval of the Map in the Engineering Department and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division reports and has considered other evidence pr =rented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10349 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design, of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access tnrough or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. i o-5'49' 7 -Z- 0.CDV 11:61 V11 14V. 01- Page 2 4) (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. Section 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 10349, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached standard conditions: Planninq Division 1. More variation in front yard setbacks shall be provided on lots 10 through 14. 2. Architectural treatments, such as veneer, wocd trim, wood siding, shall wrap around the corners and sides of the buildings to a logical stopping point.. - 3. Additional wood trim and architectural treatment shall be provided around upper story rear and side windows. 4. The developer shall provide an option for potential buyers for the installation of double pane windows. Engineering Division 5. Private drainage easement with concrete drains for cross lot drainage shall be required along all affected lots, including those along the southerly tract boundary. The easements shall be delineated on the map. E. All existing easements lying within the future right -of- way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per City Engineer's requirements prior to recordation of the map. 7. At the time of underground utility installation and prior to installation of street improvements, the developer shah contact the appropriate cable television company for the area and make arrangements which would give the company the opportunity to install cable at the time of trenching. If the cable television company does not install cable, then the developer shall install conduit and pull boxes throughout the tract. Such details shall be shown and verified on the improvement plans. S. Sidewalk is required along Sapphire and on one side of the street throughout the subdivision. The sidewalks shall be broom finished. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1981. PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 o3�{q 11 N 11 El nano l u 6lull 1'U. O1-.jl Page 3 BY:. r,icnara uant, cna-irman ! ATTEST:. I Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of Januarv, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Tolstoy, King, Rempel, Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None P o34cr N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject•_ r= Sff ATt\S ALT 10349 Applicant:_ Location: gyp( f&-, Am !cxxvpwar— P4:*I /_ oAc= =v,l"1 s�_ howleA Those ite,ls checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITii THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Develoment I. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. —Z3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. 4. The developer shal'i provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recrea Vehicle storage pur. cant to City standards. 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and I ocated by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. _ 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. 10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. o3yCj 'D -S _ 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. No lignting shall adverse?y affect adjacent properties. 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. _ 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. .Z16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. —Z 17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. _Z18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit. 14. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. —Z20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. _Z21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. _ 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Eire Protection District. 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall: be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. _Z24. This tract shall form or an!ax to a :maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. i o3cfq t F3 C. _ 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. Parking and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. _ 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 3. Ail two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 8. The C.C. & R-'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. 9. no parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Landscaping �1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. _Z2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. I 0-3q? 7'7 i 0) ®) V00003 . Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be tr-irred and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. _Z;. Strut trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. S. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 7000-15 gallon, and 10 % -5 gallon. �6. Ali landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. �J 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required alono (a34c? All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and _Z7. are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but nct be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in J satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. Vf B. All parkways, open wreas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall _Z9. be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and _Z10. sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by ti;a Planning Division. 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. �J 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required alono (a34c? E. signs 1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. Additional Approvals Required — I. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of th.> final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance /Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at which time the Planning Conmission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. O _Z5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract , on I have read the C.C. & R7.—'sand understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. �6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final ;nap approval in the case of the subdivision . map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. l 0341 . 0_7 _Z7 -1 M Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. 9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 41 Site Development �1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and ali other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of issuance of Building Permits for this project. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. _z3_ Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or additier, to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. ( o-se4q G. H. _ 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. _ZB. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation racing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around widows and wa30 siding or plan -ons where appropriate. Existing Structure: _ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building considering use, area and fire- resistiveness 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply Zoning regulations for the intended use or t 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be to comply with appropriate grading practices Code for property line clearances of existing buildings. with current Building and ie building shall be demolished. removed, filled and /or capped and the Uniform Plumbing Code. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. _ 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. _ZS. The final grading piarl shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERII.G DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access -Z 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on t o -Mcl _Z3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as follows: _ 5. Reciprocal easements shali be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private reads, drives, or parking areas. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. J. Street Im:;rovements 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway tre -s and street lights on all interior streets. D !7 Z. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS OTHER —`F - - -- — _Z3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. _Z5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. _✓ 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. C) -SCR �- (Z K. L. M Drainage and Florid Control 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2_ Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to t'ie provisions of the program and Cit; Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. _-5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or 'landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. Utilities 1. All proposed utilities within, the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. _Z4_ Developer shall be responsible for the instaliation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District aiiu the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD Trill be required prior to recordation. _4Z6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received frcm them. General Recuirements and A.ocrovals 1. Permits from other agencies will be rGz: :.red as follows: 0) A. Caltrans for: J B. County Dust Abatement required prior to ? °seance of a grading pe C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Other: I 0-5cf? _ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCZR's) and Artirles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of ® the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to term Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. In l o3�i� �' 14 �r iJr � I 1� I 4-1 i✓iGOL�/NO�'9 na sca.'e E •- p �I � �� \ti1 I:•7� ly.�m II I�" � li 1 ' i3 I •...1 . i• --I� •��5`�•I1I ,III 1 • II 5q9q III Yy II :R L r l � 1 s h i / r � /� r � 1� i•p E •- p �I � �� \ti1 I:•7� ly.�m II I�" � li 1 ' i3 I •...1 . i• --I� •��5`�•I1I ,III 1 • II 5q9q III Yy II :R C5� NORTH CITY OF rrENI: --igaliLegl! -CC > k45' R.L\-CHO CUCAMO,- PLANNING D'SO ExHIBTr- _ E -1 SCALE- i 1� i•p C5� NORTH CITY OF rrENI: --igaliLegl! -CC > k45' R.L\-CHO CUCAMO,- PLANNING D'SO ExHIBTr- _ E -1 SCALE- 11 RESOLUTION NO. 80 -79 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11563. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11563, _:einafter "Map" submitted by Red Hill Partners, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 4.42 acres located on Sierra Vista, north of Red Hill Country Club Dr. and being divided into 12 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on December 10, 1980; and WHEREAS, the City Planner subject to all conditions set forth Divisions reports; and has recommended approval of the Map in the Engineering and Planning WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SZCTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11563 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all Applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause seric" public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, roe; of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. III.5b3 G-li Resolution No. 89 Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the enviromnent and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11563, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division I. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 2. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or i .3suance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Dater Control Board and the City, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. 3. All slope banks in access of Five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative nethod of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. 1 F 563 E -3 Resolution No. 8� Rage 3 4. This subdivision, was not submitted as a total develop,--,-, package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract hones. 5. This approval shall become null and void if the final subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. 6. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 7. Existing trees are to be retained where street improvements • do not occur. The final grading plan shall accurately indicate the location and that they are to be retained. 8. The slopes along the west property line of lots 9, 10, and 11 shall be eliminated in favor of a retaining wall. Engineering Division 9. Dedication of right -of -way for Sierra Vista Drive, shall be 60 feet wide (30' each side of the centerline of the street) with 15 feet radius at property corners at the intersection of Sierra Vista Drive and Red Hill Country Club Drive. 10. The proposed storm drain shall be 24" minimum R.C.P. centered on i2' wide dedicated easements. 11. The applicant shall contact and make arrangements with adjacent property owners to dispose of the surplus land beyond 60' wide required right -of -way to: the portion of Sierra Vista Drive from Re,, niil Country Club Drive to the first lots of the tract. 12. All existing easements lying within the future right -of- way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per ':he City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. 13. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any existing utility facility that would affect construction. 14. Existing City road requiring reconstruction, shall remain open for traffic at all times with adequate detours during actual construction. A cash deposit shall be required to cover the cost of the grading and paving prior to recordation of the tract map. On completion of the grading and paving, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the cash deposit shall be refunded. 11 S63 Resolution No. 80 -79 Page 4 'd, le 15. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 16. Letters of acceptance from downstream property owners shall be required where runoff from the tract flows onto private properties. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1980. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AM ... w.u•u aaulal, N11611 IG 11 — .: �1 .__ iU ATTEST Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commissior, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of December, 1980 by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempei, Tolstoy, Kir.g, Sceranka, Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 1 54.3 6's DEPART?D;NT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject = Z�,AA /1'E JE T Applicant: RED hILL P/Iic% /t /epJ Location: JIC71f,i/J$7,41, 1y0 ZE RED l'f /LL- Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHAI-T. CONTACT TEE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COI-SLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Develooment 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of / building permits. Y ?. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. 4. The developer shall prcmide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. S. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. •J. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire District as "hazardous:, the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. The developer shall intecra.te a variety of approved roof materials and colors into the design of the residential development in a manner which is both compatible and complimentary among each of the residential units. 3. All roof acourtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally int- grated, shielded from. view and the sound bufferad from adjacent properties and -.reets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. -Z10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Co_7munity Development. I L S' &3 c -.6 W C. 1 � Parking and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minirrum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. 2. Parking lot lights shall be a maximum height of 12' from the finished grade of the parking surface and directed away from all property lines, adjacent streets and residences. 3. Parking lot trees shall be a mini=m 15 gallon size. 4. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 5. Emergency access shall be provided , maintenance free and clear, a minimu;n of 24 feet wide at all times during constrn:ction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 6. All parking spaces shall be double stripped, iandscaaing 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. A Master Plan of the Existing On -Site Trees shall be provided to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits and prior to grading to determine which trees shall be retained. _Z/I� 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the discretion of the Planning Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal shall be replaced on a tree -for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. Ve 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70t -15 gallon, and 10%-5 gallon. 6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condi- tion, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 1 ! sfo�j 6-7 1. I APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DPJISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. Site Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. —Z 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District-Fire Chief that. _ water supply for fire protection is available. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s) , the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking fees, and school fee. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee. Permit and Plan Checking fees. 5. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. -Z 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building offical. H. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire- resistiveness of existing buildings. 2, rxistina building(s) shall be made to comoly with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. Gradina 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. lL D. Siqns 1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. E. Recreation I- The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract _, on (date) , I have read the CCSR's and understand that said int is subject to a mutual reciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain. access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. F. Additional Approvals Rewired 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance /Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of months) at which time the Planning Com.ission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. � -g _ 2. A so:' _.port shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the St" .f California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified en "Ineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application, for grading plan check. Y 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT TAE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street riaht_s -of- ay and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of. -way on the following streets: additional _eet on additional feet on additional feet on 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards.] 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as follows: _ 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parc:ls over private roads, drives, or parking areas. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. K. Street Improvements E 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 1 i 5%-ls E-10 —Z 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: STR."ET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVMT_ SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPP.. STREET LIGHTS A.C. i OVERLAY •� WHEEL CiAIR RAMPS OTHER ✓ f! ” 1 �i0ti�� d'Sj� Ccfra- i � t �.� tiSy �1�iC1,l3C c c!:s,,cCC � :.rL� a, s��, =G�r.• CIU�� ,� �:..aL � ^S 7°i1vr;. i�r, _= ,•�tcrcG�a�'ipr rE`.1 „Tf G CaG2'r,r.i�l�Sfl� �GGZ'rrrrn c'Y'l�iCi CL. 3_ Prior to an work being performed in the public right of -way, an encroach- ment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Erg:reer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and stree= name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. L. Drainage and Flood Control ✓ 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drain -ge facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations= 3. The proposed nroject falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the Nat_=al Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions of that program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to streets. E -1 r 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commer- cial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or landscaped earth be--ms and rolled driveways at property lire: M. Utilities 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground incluaing utilities along major arterials less than 12 Kv_ 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. Y 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and.City standards. 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of corpliar_ce from CCWD will be required prior to recordation. 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. N. General Requirements and Approvals _ _ 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: B. County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the al:proval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. C -/Z V 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to Fora Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in District Formation shall be borne by the developer. 1/ 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. t r Sr✓ 3 11 El E 11 rem enf•n.!+ yi�� ^ a �. += aye — _• • - - _ ' w4 tj{ Ytt CID CITY OF rrE,\I: mmie C;4r -= ® RA1lCHO CUCA N,10 \�G k TME: --rn�gX mAe PLANNING DI4'M.N EXHIBIT- _F- t SCALE- — I 1O4YID M. —� J11850PT I 'pkB50PT ! i -TIT Itlozs PROPOSED P� i I I I YOpLTIE rem enf•n.!+ yi�� ^ a �. += aye — _• • - - _ ' w4 tj{ Ytt CID CITY OF rrE,\I: mmie C;4r -= ® RA1lCHO CUCA N,10 \�G k TME: --rn�gX mAe PLANNING DI4'M.N EXHIBIT- _F- t SCALE- — kal RESOLUTION N0. 81 -07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION nr Tr` ARL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY vp APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11625. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11625, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Roberts Group, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonca, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential development located On the northwest corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue, consisting of 101 condominium dwelling units on 7.3 acres consisting of two (2) lots, and; WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Plannirg Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at tie public hearing. NOW. THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11625 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantiai environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the propev`y within the proposed subdivision. i!(OZS F— Z� rtCbU1UL)U11 ilu. 01-U/ Page 2 N (g) This project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. Section 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 11525, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions_ Planning Division 1. In conjunction with the development of Phase 1, all street landscaping and mounding shall be completed. 2. The use of any garden wells along the street landscaping shall incorporate alleuvial rock. 3. Interior landscape planters in front of garages shall be planted with trees. 4. Curvilinear sidewalks shall be provided along 19th Street. 5. ThP project shall be designed to retain Live Oak tree near the west property line and the lire Oaks at the northeast corner of the site. A detailed tree plan shall be submitted which will indicate how such trees will be retained. Engineering Division 6. The street improvement plans for 19th Street shall be designed and constructed to meet any requirements of Caltrans. The plans shall be approved by Caltrans prior to recordation of the map. 7. Design and installation of improved channel facility for Alta Loma Channel from the northerly tr;.ct boundary to Hermosa Avenue shall be required per San Bernardino County Flood Control District's Standards. All on -site and off -site required right -of -way shall be dedicated in fee to Flood Control District. The construction cost of the channel shall be credited to the star. drain fee, and a reimbursement agreement will be executed per section 8 of City Ordinance No. 75 to cover contributions which exceed the amount of these fees. S. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas on north and northwest. 9. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quit claimed or delineated, as per City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. !1Io2S F -3 Resolution No. 61 -01 Page 3 ao 10. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalk. Under sidewalk drain shall be installed to City standards. 11. At the time of underground utility installation and prior to installation of street improvements, the developer shall contact the appropriate cable television company for the area and make arrangements whi ^h would give the company the opportunity to install cable at the time of trenching. If the cable television company does not install cable, then, the developer shall install conduit and pull boxes throughout the tract. Such details shall be shown and verified on the improvement plans. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA BY: rman c ng I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Sceranka, King, Tolstoy, Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None I CfvzS K DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject: TERIXTIVe TRACT J(&2S" Applicant: 11305EFTS &M)P Location: Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development �1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein.. —Z 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. _ 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. _ 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof ruaterials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building perriit. 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. _Z 9. All roof appurtenances, integrated, shielded fn and streets as required _Z10. Prior to any use of the thereon, all conditions the satisfaction of the 11 including air conditioners, shaii be architecturally )m view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties by the Planning and Building Divisions. project site or business activity being commenced of approval contained herein shall be completed to Director of Community Development. _Z11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. --Z12. All swimming pools instilled at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall �e provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. __Z14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. —Zlb. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. �17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit. 19. All units within this development shall be prepiumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. _ 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. _ 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. M 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. I I%2-S F'to _ 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. B. Parking and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. __V_/2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. _y/ o". All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. ® _Z7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. V1'e8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. 11 l it (025- r'i No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other _Z9. than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C_ landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and apprcved _✓ by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. / 2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. 11 l it (025- r'i __.Z3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Site Tree:. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree- for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. __:6Z4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall to installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the Cit, of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. _Z5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 200 -24" box or larger, 700 -15 gallon, and 101-5 gallon. _Z6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. _Z7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamoi:aa. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, ar. inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it it in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation or, custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. _ 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. _ 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleiviai rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along 1!11 O,nd ifZ.r,n VS4 0 C197 F- i D. Signs E. 11 1 Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to instaliation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning 'Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. 3. The s-, -. indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approva; and will require separate sign review and approval. Additional Approvals Required 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished 1 subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No.JJ%25- of Zone Change gLL4L , d r ^ -Vari 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted which time the Planning Commission may the Conditional Use Permit. :rior to recordation of the final is granted subject to the approval for a period of month(s) at add or delete conditions or revoke 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract , on , I have read the C.C_ & R.'s and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed_ Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. --vol6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of ail other residential projects. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuan of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from th affected water district, that aiequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. This subdivision was not submitted required to reapply for a point ra of the Growth Management Ordinance of the map if the subdivision is o. APPLICANT S CONDITIONS: Site Development BUILDING DIVISION total development package and is relative to the design section r to final approval and recordation to be developed as tract homes. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply protection is available. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwalling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or development or addition to an existing development, the applicant development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Checking Fees. approval shall become null and void if building permits this project within one year from the date of project ap 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and nor.- combustible roof material. 8. All corner dwellings shall have the street upgrade with additional wood or plan -ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures building elevation facing the trim around windows and wood siding I. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building considering use, area and fire - resistiveness 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply Zoning regulations for the intended use or t 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be to comply with appropriate grading practices Code for property line clearances of existing buildings. with current Building and he building shall be demolished. removed, filled and /or capped and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Grading �vl*"1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards znd accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. __Z2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licersed by the State of Caiiforn'a to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. v-' 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERIN_r DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOI•IING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access I. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown, on the tentative map. y" 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on /�L'tfYJO58 �i'ehGle 11 additional feet on /q, 7t,o� A 8/alllf/P�ui���j _ Fri? !9>`fi r� Tnt ic%�+ r- �siirrn wifll ffBrAtos9 /Ftt.�� i�°!1f -map 11G�S F-11 J _,C3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. -\T'_ i 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as follows: Hermosa AYe• , n7LL4, c- * Sukied _Z5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas,ana 05171/ be iwc&ed w/# 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed businEss. Street Improvements _ 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. Construct the following missing improvem -nts including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURS & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE - WALK j DRIVE 1 APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS OTHER I ✓ �/ �/ + ✓ l9 >t Si. ✓ ✓ r� ,� ' ✓ 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment Permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. _p/ 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street i rove n s, prior to issuance of an encro�y �r ent permit.Mw filets and ra iu�fr�tof any a rg ccfilc�y �aikzo ffyff oz# offrif eamyraafiaf. 5. Surety shal"i be p5sted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. 0 114 K. Drainage and Flood Control 1/ 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: __j,::-3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood insurance Program and is subject to the provisions of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. ff��sylo;�g �9dt�ue �/ 5. TF r " . ..�h e� - -ets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, roiled street connections, flood protection wails, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. L. Utilities ✓ 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 1.2 KV. 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. 3. ^vvaioper shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public .Ailities, as required. 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street ighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. s'� 5. Water and sewer system pians shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. _,!:'6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. M. General Reouireme 1. Permits ,/A B. L--Z�C. D. its and Approvals from other agencies will be required as follows: Caltrans for: 11.9 Sf. County Dust Abatement required prior- to issuance of a grac San Bernardino County Flood Control District Other: � r�s F -f3 ng permit) 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, so bject to the approval of -the City attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. _ 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall bE filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in District_ Formation shall be borne by the developer. 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and Procedures. C� v t(G2S -,� 11 =Z PLAN Any MCASMfG Mm TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11660 fff CITY OF RAi\'CHO CTUCALTMO\GA PLANNING Dl'%rM.N Q' ITE.� I.77n.1E "L ;"i • = TT ! l !r.(o-� TITLE- -NK�- AAkP EXHIBIT l2'+' ; SCALE = — RESOLUTION NO. 81 -124 A RESuLUTI01i OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITION- ALLY APPROVING REVISED SITE PLAN FOR aLANNED DE- VELOPMENT NO. 80 -12 (MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION /TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11663) WHEREAS, the site plan for Planned Development No. 80 -12 (Tentative Tract No. 11663) has been approved by the Planning Ccmmission by Resolution No. 81 -70; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Marlborough Development Corporation has agreed to refer the original submission back to the Planning Commission to consider alternative modifications that would help mitigate neighborhood concerns; and WHEREAS, City Staff, representatives of the neighborhood group, and Marlborough Development Corporation have met and discussed various design alternatives to do the same; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered all reports and evidence presented at the public hearing; fAVj NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes all the findincs contained in Section 1 of Resolution No. 81 -70. SECTION 2: The Plarring Commission approves the modified site plan for P annneed Development No. 80 -12 (Tentative Tract No. 11663) a copy of which is attached hereto subject to all the following conditions: I. All conditions of Resolution No. 81 -70 shalt become conditions of Resolution No. 81 -124. Wherein those conditions that ray conflict, Resolution Nc. 81 -124 shall take precedence. 2. Marlborough Development Corporation shall wort: closely with the Central School District to provide the proper route to school access through Planned Develuoment No. 80 -12, and shall be included in CC &R's. 3. All elevations and design of units along the Ramona frontage shall be as per the revised elevations sub- mitted and attached hereto. L® 4. Parking as shot-in along the mair roadway through the project shall be comoletely eliminated, between Archibald and the circle. I 16 (�--5 �i Z L Resolution No. 81---124 Page 2 `.1 :1 5. Tole tot lot areas and recreation and open space areas shall be redesigned to provide better continuity. To provide such better continuity, ten additional units shall be deleted from the site plan and shall be subject to Design Review prior to final map approval. 5. All construction phasing shall give the Ramona Street frontage prier to of the project. 7. Ramona Street improvements shall be time the first increment of street are started. p+-i on ty to other portions done at the improvements 8. A traffic signal shall be installed at the Archi- bald entry to the project at the time this main road is constructed to intersect with Archibald Avenue. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE M Ma ATTEST: TTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA arning Commiss I, JACK L -41, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote - to -wit: AY =S: COMMISSIONEPS: Dahl, Rempel, Sceranka, Tolstoy, King NOES: COMA.!SSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None `e RESOLUTION NO. 81 -70 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONu , r" IF- ORNIA, Cnni�rTIONAL� v A Cn�.. ,,,... APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11663 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11663, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Marlborough Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a subdivision for a total development of 413 townhouses on 40 acres in the R -2 zone, located on the east side of Archibald, on the south side of Church, west side of Ramona - APN 1077- 133 -08, and 1077 - 631 -03 into 437 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing an on June 10, 1931, and _ WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and corsider2d the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has consid,zred other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11663 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury w humans and wildlife or their habitat; ;e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed Subdivision. I� & &-5 is Page 2� ® t (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11663, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. Site and Landscape Plans shall be revised to provide an adequate landscape buffer along the westerly boundaries of the project adjacent to existing school and apartment complex. Such revisions shall be subject to approval by both the City Planner and the Foothill Fire District, prior to final map recordation. 2. A continuous looped pedestrian walkway shall be provided along all interior boundaries of the project. 3. A minimum of six (6) permanent children play areas shall be incorporated into the design of the project. Three (3) of the areas shall be active areas with play equipment. Precise location of such facilities shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior to final map recordation. 4. The temporary retention basin /play area shall be fenced ® with a 5' high wrought iron fencing, and its periphery shall be heavil, landscaped. A lawn or other appropriate ground cover shall be installed and maintained within the fenced area. 5. The design and intensity of architectural detailing of all structures and patio walls shall be in substantial compliance with submitted elevations. 6. CC &R's for this project shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior to recordation. Clear indication of five lanes shall be included. 7. All units along the southern most property line shall not exceed one -story in height. 8. Directories, identifying location, of units and buildings shall be provided at key positions within the development. ENGINEERING DIVISION 9. A soils and geological study regarding the effect of ground saturation due to the storm retention basin on the foundation of the existing adjacent house and any suggested mitigating measures shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to recordation of the map. t ! (fd5 �Cr S i' Page 3 1 10. An on -site and off -site drainage study for the project shall be provided to the City Engineer for review prior to recordation of the map. After review of the study, the City Engineer reserves the right to determine requirements of construction, reconstruction or alteration of on -site storm drainage system to his satisfaction. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 1981. PLANNING COM,ISSIO�N Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Richard Dahl, Chairma ! i , ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of June, 1,981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Rempel, King, Tolstoy, Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None I14lre� (sue—% is ZZ L„ r V r G _ S - -, 4 ' W •� q T r = p Q V q PG = >_ >: d O pJ O p V d0O V r Lb ObO d `V qy •r• 9 = ..• q G L YO bw V J✓C O. y .�-•n E bl d0 G.+' L� y y q- C L .• _ E V d ^f L Y v G N O S] ` a O ✓ V r b_ A ` A L ^ r l L J G V O _ l n � O y N T q V O r Y ✓ d q E r O O q` C C� N 1l ^ q q L r � y 9_ • N � > 9 V L _ ^ V� L N y C O .+ V C✓ p � A P C V T w n V C O i r O t O L a V - C= � L w� y 'A •� = •Y y q� 0 V ✓ ^� <w l b y 9 C q' ` V l F V` 6 4 - ✓ b a q u a V _ t' C � .O.r � •. 6 6? C V O G 6 �r P C g P° q O N 7i y N r n nJ __ v•n NV_ Y ✓r b T _ Lwi � V C t0 J •- OJO r67 C _°. ✓ � � $ '_ n Y Pn6 .o �� ^fin .Y. °'- °v =u ✓�✓ ` J c' `u ._ •'� E O C� A N 9 O L q ' _ >r AL O Y N N =dd O. n✓ r FV4A ,°nsV Vrr Yqy V- 'N.. 6 q✓ A.°/ � e � � 4 vu w CP • b p EVL� tC VW L•Cp 4 bC .°ire C�Vtn AL r C= N T• = _W C N r r v O i 6 4 r b _a Y L E O C 9 C V _C 60 AV t O J- 9nCo L 6 V�Zg6q L �Z y`b _u �•C1 pT p w= V n L w w V .. 4^ C A. O V C O C V 4 O S= •�. w. y P 4 N .J L > •� q P � T V n A i Y U L V •. C- V- Fl Oy w �°� ar CO � flu d + +9� ` pu O 6V LV>T Or •L' . J V � °� � u V � 4 O 6 ✓•� V _ N C O r C G V L :� C C J S G C L N = q C Y C b l V 4 V A L .. � ^ O � �✓ L� C a C V •nt ✓ V >L'y 4 i W }W EP .02 rqO =✓ O �L 6n 2-0- - n' ✓ C C N V i L •Vr• C R C° IVi r S L V ✓ N O y T p w G+ b ✓ n C tl G O d C �✓ V q ° C q E = .7 ✓ v V C >. T L ✓ C _ C C N tj �9 �C �J � y.'• VTVY VT TO O TV✓ E O�w6 Ycb EOa L � _� G� - V � ^^ U 4 ✓ U- w O N V Y�� N r+ � 4 Y N 0 V y. « N O. C q N O V f 6 W+ L i r i � 3] l r V N 2 � - t• V p .• q � 6 O 6 = O a N V ✓ .ti � = y O C P 0 "O O ✓ q O �.. L q p � � C [LV` y ✓ 9 V n L r r O t(�•` • � 6 V+ 4 Y w� C p q • �� � O � l � T` r p Fa ,� `CI Z 4 L C L .L•� p V Ln1 O ` > -Z AEI V C A � r > O ✓ n i� 9 N L J ✓ P w C r w Q G d p4 G G n M V � � :G- pw ✓�Op = V✓ 40 V O �O r_a OLO d J V = O E6 4 P N T 9 E O 57 2 a y r J �• - q C W 2yj �c Nc V� A.>'i a�� p0 �cV cam. `C w� vE4N ]• N r OC }V r+ - wV GM9 p�G 4 ✓q r 9Y ° L4 O O W .• .rY. .T•> rj1 P L C E Y= C C[ Y V _ Z9 r: 4v T ^•°np i.°. ^rc S 4C oo CCC � LO L N✓ � C fd j w V w .r V4A F 06 CrY r Z T 'w` A � w V . d ✓ L G G C O C _+ A L =•�.r 9 O n T M =� 0 4 C V O !• L N l d r C j d P .'J V IIVV p O� _ Vrq 6 ✓OL q _O pjLN ✓ 1V 6 \, A O 9 V 9✓ •.• � wl J a r O q 9 N_ u. d o _ w C +� V> C T g O O qV b q✓ O L7 ' �. V q N 9 b q l Y � O L V .'• O H _ L r O \ •^ � c a'i .✓pi .•v^ ae wu.L. rd �L noo k°".o E�i ac`u °q •'[L. „ � Q� GN qJ] >'� O� NNT FN did yCL CVC 6•rV _J -y w C6 _w ✓ �^ CdC N ` ^a w.0 VOr O✓ a✓ nN •V T q2 ¢ NOI - � > i _ _ O c J �r� _ .Y•.YE P —cam G V r b P L r c _ C O d A V V w O C .Lw V p U ✓ .°• .i O N O 4 \ \, ` Y� n r� l •q nL•c LNT V �� .J f -q ~Lm GO cy `7' L.A �. .N Tq� it ✓ =� rEi c9 t1 '. o o.i..°. oo• 'vo O6 v ° =d € q v ✓'c i— .da✓ i oroi .°. cow e• o ec.c c `O+ -2G . J .. NN ° NC >q7 GGF YV q =p .'ill _rV rVd L 'SPY b�Tn r� tOy C; a $ + o �v h� l� � l I l � ♦ � P� � ���� �H +as ti a b E ob r0 L q C ...•� �O A � .� SL+ O � V d C q � V �. ✓ A u L Y O w ✓ V d � q"J v � �rw �_.°. 2 y c � c y✓ "� °�«°. orrrY` O U A V y 2f F b+ ✓ v O {I.- ° L V 60 0 6 O V✓ •n GO 00 r Ny IQ Ar r O�r •.._ «U ^ 6 u M6 JO bV_ ai ✓b r L nn b✓ wV `laq ✓ LEVfLNL+ C ri Q O �° C Od y LV p- y -a-✓- �-LV.r 2 •Vr• u AO _L• M"" A L « LV L_ VrV Lifwr G� ✓ C ... r e � 4 O C W � � J M P '� q 6 d .2'9 zz Y V T L L O d i G r b rr A v i O ^° u V O •w r w _✓ •� --L'c bob V« yJ. :y u u g .n o. aq " ° a 2Z2% VLd � n+•n wG L « A q —.� °> � lY» � rL U.rr.�L� O C L O p? e x - _py `w> PV ° V r d O' C °C JL_ n y_ w� G Y °O S� c✓ V C O a C p< O n C Y = W 7 S _V L E V ° P �9 ✓ r T 2 N r ~1c - •rJi '. 4 n Y „ L 9 6 l P r V- -� Y _ 6 w p- L ✓ i L w � v °- b^ °M 9C9 CF.0 —p �b C C Ofi T O�C Lr� L 9uV c ✓ � ui `WL ^ W Y �.0.• O•wo p` rLq q 6VV •ae l.< ✓ =� c6.6 lPP c_ CC b n `�r= N � Oq UbE �Nd Cu � W �r4 ��� .9 > Q 4� � Cr9 i4✓ b Ou 4nA_ >V.`O ✓ L 'O— T O T i> i°. ^a b bdr o d� r2 4 62a Gam -6 C� dV 4� pn -•�V �j o�F�- ".��"•' NO 6 rV )_WOO O 44 El 0 L - L b ?r W✓ L 4' d �_ Y L On P O � L -g.2 2, L O 40 b "= ^4r •"�-A V 10b a u T�- EL_ .` dY L OG O. •nq ^ U O .°nM V A J —� Cr aOJ ^ q 2 V i r ° e _� c _• � y c "O. � ^` w^ P ° L V n� c e V O O L a w N•n6 ...L •e `OU P" � 2u n0 ✓J= CND p i y � q✓ A C y C ° •Ln ✓ 2 � C C L ^ 9 2�- O L i d V y «T pJG 2L a�L �P Ldp �.00_L rya .WTC Y A O yy. �.� CG OO W� PVC• G V Nb` v b VC O Y V VV✓ MJ 'Gr` "'may �% T 9VAV rd6r `rr ✓« > 4` S r V 9 Py L nw ry V _ G L O d r t r O i G L✓ O 9 O l PrF -2.;z a O a •n Y P O O Pr V O O y ✓� F,= T. L d O C✓ ` l C V ^ 4 A C 4 C v O N L > b J A a V nJ •a V O i ` i r ^ •e G r ^ V O V 4 J O P C J t _ a. W � co - _n cc�- w° op_E� -e Lld .0 9 �c"�` -.i oa ✓� ° a. �L_ L ..L.� 6 YF G �� 40 n Cr LVt". `^ V ✓L n _= 4°nCb�rL O✓ VV � E E V u O r" q P � T °� b- O V V� � c V a v` 4 O g O r O✓ � •� G O V 1 "P W J VnV c C nV Cl� ^Sd✓t W VV � —¢L Lr A.nr a Ol a L ✓� — OO 2�OryT �.r A✓ ^ CC °"n 6V bV O ^ 9 p _Y V _ 2 A- a A r b N l `•a a° A V> 9 V b= Y< y V C G C F b O V ^ O O 2 L `n OPGw. °•� G6N d PAb� Wb EL N C V 4 O q V w •Cj O t �' A L L V >^ b w O V w VV ✓ 6✓ O L .y O 4r✓ a b L ¢ �Vd .6 `4 L.J`° .` SL pnY DA 00� ^LSC'V 90 QJ �CL.r1 O i y Dl r•_rJi G—O aP� ° —`]6 i'•w °d GAO Lw OD f.O_� `^O vG s � °= n n e- Via.• - c d`9b� @�a� M.L..._ +ro r4 _� -e fA,.ca qo Y WAV V a O fJ .t ^ —�� v0 w•— O- r•bV <"°.b LV 2P aS „•"<C�A 4"S. A.•^ OV c 'A V9✓ w � Nil Mb iM qC •w �r CbC Oy.Lr.� N =M 6 •nwLl GG W ^V ___O O b� —a d — c ` V T A Y• r^ N _ C O J V Y C ✓ i � O 9 O I Pre -j n L 1i L A v 2 L C A V O b✓— J= C .r• q TAW Y ✓ C O CC 0= �•�. L�C= `d AG °CC aO��00_ q � �a GC OLD 6bA> b� —f a4Yr _O �✓�. L.A.rY°L C`GY z '_o' EAC .-.✓ WAe ^�`r v•• EE �° O O' 6 a u 4 V P r r 0 z Z— E i j l 1 -_ P" __4q ✓ u ✓ ✓ � O f1 c P r �� G ✓� L N P V� V rir ✓ q�_T_ VJ ° ✓� fE Cq CON �q V_ yP _LO u r «C ✓e u >. DCV L JnD ✓ � L G V 4 N pY V dP r O P�✓ P I Lu V yV VY r « qVV ,J • 9L L✓> VVC r C L N >• L O_FO r .r L �_ LT�n W L ✓ C L°. i ` I N V L _V V L✓ _✓ V O r O ✓ I O O ` C ^ L ✓� q nl ._O M d d C✓ V�� u r �' N L V Or i I i 1 � P� p L P N_ 9 ✓° V r� p �4 q p, q V d V6 Q C T i O� A d •� L M r ✓✓ Nu q D 4 = OYd r •a> �DN L_�tT .E..�N iP00 -s S C >r � \ � .. r .°.D 'QL P dC qLV E ��� luq iPL «CN s4rr�C ^' 90 V \CLZ• r � N V VAC i V" O4P ldtl GND C ✓p G L✓ G .C. � yrcir °' vr� r9e 9 d w � `.� � =E c O • ! u C P > ✓ O , T q V O 'Le T ]•� rRR y`✓ _ j C ��� l L� N �� O I L ` O I= 7 V C q r L'O L V C A N_ �� q W C '• .r °° � t- L �= p N ^ — C q c L m S 3 q O F •r q F L b NL_ a^ rr°Gr l N G „ �yylri � aAr PY ✓uP 1 `NC .rrL Oc —a0 `� >OV W g V"L ° 4— 9p✓ VD v N� ON C V_IY J d yqY • -v9 ✓ TL e:� cr_b^ L_o �4gcL. p, pN Lcc r v itq. aFn_ ` ✓c L uParc. N9J DrrJi °09 VVVU� EA A =�L v` .JrrEJ A_O V rgnY° ✓YVPO q L u✓r ✓✓ ` O. y V a L V A i �� y r G y✓ V A °.�q��C � � Y V W Vow. D y s L J LN i pq L rr ✓ C�� �qr EyL Aqy W O �V r_ �4C O` Ur. n••JO S NdNLA COL E r«nTl�a� = °Lu D° r . L P n l t� V W •+ O a l l T U Or O r N V« O✓ V L rL° 4 V r O q „ L r= Y°. C K L 6• Y O _ T ' m D� N �' o ° Ny � � vY� aqr � =� L.qr✓ c ^ yc rci once �° 4 ° �= C �� Or 6 re�rdOr T ✓ a ✓qP 1.14 p C b� O L A� r J V DT 6w C M y O f d N ? 9 L pr PVO w V✓r ^ PYO J[L u L•4..L W 1 •dr DV e• NL p✓ .-.r« OC,L✓ COV s W C _ _ ✓ ✓ ^~✓ q e Y X69 ✓v Lq Pl _ T_� n ✓_✓ q� >GL� O. OV N� f. T✓pq r L ° ` �(��('� �t }• -T V } FaO� �d OCP O_ _Y L •LrrCq ON r O OPVY lY 6P..L. •V.dN q _ Ow pq q✓ GV 4V V✓ PFC t� r 6V0 EfJ N N 9_ _ O L_ Zl O _V.• O c i90 rNN C r C NO V Op C � � N ° O •• V y PC P� NO `qr erN�OV Y L AF CO vq t � I l uN _ O� =C� J OLO 6LV TOL rr°rV O U YO OqV _d u.J• V_> V NOr 6YL pr�r6 tL per~.. <YfOD Nrp V 7• P^ Ol6 O J 4T V= qr«/ V � C tT0 dqd q LV � L` G6 yi VO�V <N <A LO r_ rVw < q a V O r f V4Y N wr 00 O✓ V I 6 a0i O d r °r'r w° 9• X 2 0 C O C q _N `° O V V_ Y N p N p C� J� C O 4_ •^ 6 LA��>pO qL= N6U q�0« qJ V7L >r —`n�6 V AE V YVOE � CtA` r9Ce NO O`L° OQe!q 4P .N C•O 00 �q�._C°�NIE y�L ^NdN V ... �� q W✓ 2` pOOC D L � LO n. L. 9 D rn V L� r J V� .V.. O tL d q.° L T9 q P .: u�,Nr. cMVN mF�✓ c�cPL P� __� i'k M�y� S ✓ W N .`•rc �ncE �. q cN �= 7= vc °N G`V DLrq _i X1"1 i qy GWL Ct� ��— p V Q F VO qO pL r- 4 O V r dCrd V d9w F Y N r V %✓ yr✓ Y N ]•Gp Y g 4 C FF TG b y V L :- 4_ 6 L Y q L q ` L E q _ U-5 i ` r �� L rrJr q � T V` 6 EQ 4 �l V � q ✓9° , _ DVV L —�C 6 V C�VOC Cr VG P q q_ Vr V= VO EEO ���� C � N C e4>iy A O y dLY rp r W Y q W tl C } V ✓ L A L. 7. O Y_ R v J � g g EC V V Y C N L L n 6 L C r L r D 4 C L .7 4 q _ V 0� 6 c N q0 A � G r 9 '� V G r L. V f L� 4 yl A � L P � L O� •r rLyD K C 1 N _� V v T9 cY ¢ .d. �.L.r � c.o.. ZY E— Ev .Y. ar .L. r. U� 4 Y V C V J g l C �I ° P_ O C L P r O✓ a y q � J C r C V O OL= �f4 A D � _C y LLO L_6y0 _ S= CO.Lq Cd� V CN4C i L� I« O Nq G Lq ✓C N I �� O�.rJrOti� rOCP dP ., >_I iC° _q_qC :2 pV 4 =1s ' �Ery_.Npnr Vw_ J p ✓`v ✓ _ Vq > > E✓ _O� 3�•°w c_uryc L_L_ p ire C�� J n —G ogtC r ` �� p V`�LOCOOg4u u r.7 re = C A w✓9Ce q�✓irs V rO VV '6 L ✓ u> y C w- ✓_ ✓ V u raO O r� °� G _ G � _ C d J D O S N —_ V> T_ C` r O O V r J G 4 J O C 4_ L A _ T✓ O _ LyCLNNPrs` LLV -L UV= a V °— = LL N u wr q C `�VCCI d_r Yy�C- ' =4 -4 rcni w _ ° ON ✓ =pr q_ ✓k M n= :Cqr •.- N V c0_� T� Xt2z L LGC+w —q q 4y °M qE C 4q .2 CN MggVL NAgN ^L N Q O C '.1C s� � V 2. •r N r b C N O V V No�Y. q O C C q r i� d 4 r L .. � N` 4 M w .�q _ _ O _ t' °'� �✓ N .LC �� 1:5 4cn > r 9 L 2 V � � u q 4 .J. r`r N r✓ j« _✓ 9 L J O g 4 AC O L= L`J r<. u�l_ J V NOu •L° LC�C L r r 4 r`COt` � O C 4 Jr __ q P 2_ �P .Cr�-q VGr LgOq V w —O�rNn ✓I --ZL L VOU` arG �N L�_EV �7 =V= =r i;�� � ��i .J.1 r0 G Oq 1.'s•.r r..r �L VL — NL � T >w q O L N L DODO 60V.OV O C K•0- >� N V < JO � � ricer O V C n w C O + a V J n W v a V i n 4 N + e T� YN S n np =r �o co e� O E', l C 4 V o° YV' C c N u N V v i d 4 y A M 9 p L L V •� V { O L V 9 _• V 6 = y t N O. oa E - u l U F O Nv9 O V � VuF E _ ` o' c d o VV C c c P ?W V_ OTC V V L v \r, . r O 9 V b N q V p NVq 9yW.� O i N L N V Vrr L 6w6 O r c O O C ? C L P r C � W L V v d ^ r � T -a C 9 8 V P V l r OI q m O n pi W V 9 r 9 V 4 ✓ > cd Pr r V � •N. L v V`Y P C96 r V O « vL° v .7; ° 9 C E � � V L q - ✓ 6 ^� o O q 0 ° T C� L 0 C V n 4 O' V L L N n b 9 C + q d � C N O V � c C ° V O V � 1 v V 6 ` L G. G E Lb V v M L V + C T P F W O r rV L Lp mn o� v L C G O V F P u r. Ny C V Ya V L 0 P G 9 V V � Q r 9 0 4 C c'c d Ni 1 J L V n a m 7 J �o `r i C L L°• 2 N c+. Y t N U S L W F G u O C O O d O• a, i i ° • d L V r \s 2.6 + 22 _� J C L ` w ° C V `nu C T`c L`- Gr L rJ 1-. L « er ` ^ V � C w �r Y QY V • LR ` •� J N Z E V L -• d 6 + •^ L V q •'. O L O V q� ° L V POQ C\J l O. '• L G O G O _ rte. NCO 9 Ow OL d 4V o «T tea` °c i� °�S o ry 9 M r b N O Q 4 N y V V C V .V.' Y O L p v G E a q C t L V _-+ C0 O D �6•°•fi C r9�VV � O ^'� _ �r O 9« S`L v qr V r P 9 4• V•' `o q n N °W `19 l� c : q \ LP9 ° L N i E aloe nnc u L J C °c o 'o rOt 6LN u d`�"''1111 G y ✓ V �z e r r L L�p�p'�O CV ` -VC ' G4 9 6� y 4 P .aG 2 ^ u 9 O. V N V 9 W "' N o C- L oN O 1.2 q O V • V .Vn > r P L V Oyr r_l u - > •r S r V P r o .ar °- L gS� p i e V °em e cL b 0 Nad c r� r • VI ~ Ni C 3 C i C c O P E V r .O. i V ^ 0 F � 9 q ° u C C q U t:3 O + n� V + y d O 9 �n d L w ^ O. ^ C t L N -d C y O V _M P > C O q 6 L �v V ro Q v� G w O 0 d L r a 0 a i 0 E` N V P� P W u O ^ o- u V V i 4 C v c V P C oW O � L V d G V O on v S D J n r w 0 ° b r O V p O ir °a L L L L - u J 7 MC O l V •O O c� M 6>j P_d 9 d t q C V r 9 o + y C d O y V „ ` P i - p - y o � � 4 V _ L O L 4 2 9 O P -J C 4 q C = a = + - L w r o O n" u w C + F � 4 u - J 6 v O V L u d � C d P .L+ u d `I 9 V i n °c• 4 a � ^ `pC N y C y oE. - V J >� P r C b P N n V C v. C O d r v c s V W L L d J « q L N U V O r O � wv c+w u 4 V O _T C =u _ O C p .L.. i v r U c r J N a = - j N C C 4 V 4 q O 2.6 w `nu C T`c L`- Gr L rJ 1-. L « er ` ^ V � C w nrPl Z E V L -• d 6 + •^ L V n POQ C\J Vz °dam o «T tea` °c i� °�S o ry � �'•Gi " V 9 V Y O L p E a q C t L V _-+ nC D �6•°•fi C r9�VV O ^'� _ �r _ 4• `o V N °W `19 l� c : LP9 ° i aloe nnc 4r C P �z e r r L�p�p'�O CV �- -VC ' G4 9 6� y 4 P .aG uw ' �LV C.L VGy C= wmLF� �• L- 1r °- oN- LL Ny _van 9 �wr `mlC- 4rr•'J 4.•r �L� � V n r ✓� 0 0^ 6 V �� n r W ''' J S N C 11 Of bro+5 0 6 v ✓ TL L C r O O d ryV O V L i 4 d Y v p ✓V py Or � Z r V �N V66 OOH G LLY q b r p < C YS i� P� E6 p O C a C O � rr M j I.Gi 9 =r - LV � L V N u. u -O � l L O L • 1 v V u c C � L.. d O „ p 4� r r �6E O G b ... yF qV O `mom V r � p � > i o- _^ V N : d C Ca � <T E r L ^ t C C V — c q V i 4 C� L� LIub O q V J L b 1 4 L O E V o w 1 Cl O G V •• C V O L V ' J v ' O ' .Ti c 1` V L � — ` ✓ L O N �6 q ✓ C ✓ q q r V V P✓f p CC VO 11 i j !o!0 3 ,w -II O C r q �O— M ✓a p f 1 V= Y pV d p V✓ x O 4 C U p L ^ C r N r^ y o¢ Y � ` x✓ e Y N y ` ` � � ✓ � 'J Y V Y _ Y V pr _ L— u � y 9 Lp O E ✓ O�� Si � T O y p `� lz P r> w V q L O.i y C O✓ `� C G N q 4 P O a O ✓ N U V E Vp � O pJPY .r q J q y w O L •y q C •J '� � � L � q O Tv � ` n •e m TL 4 V O L y =•✓ O� q ` " •� dcd � �a�v r L a` U`Y .Tl¢L9 —C LY iV 6•� U�q� O 9 C O L Y .L.. 1 rr p L L O 9 q C' =ZEE 6 S y .� V. C 6 p✓ wL- p < r ✓ y b.5 j !o!0 3 ,w -II E F. L RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACTS 10046, 10047, 10349, 11563, 11625, and 11663 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above - described projects, pursuant to Section 1.401.11.2 of Ordinance 28 -8, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission. conditionally approved the above - described Tentative Tract Maps. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following in Fngs: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to record the Tracts at this time. C. That Strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code. D. That the granting of said time extensions will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: time extension n for: Tract 10046 10047 10349 11563 11625 11663 The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a Applicant Anden Anden Kelber Red Hill Partners Roberts Group Marlborough Expiration December 22, 1984 December 22, 1984 January 14, 1985 December 10, 1984 January 28, 1985 June 10, 1984 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3Y ® Herman Rempel, Chairman Resolution No. Page 2 11 ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission 'if the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the Sth day of June, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: C 11.1 u 11 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMVNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 8, 1983 TO: Membe -, of the Planning - ommission PROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnstosl, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TRACT 10491 - LIGHTNER - The redesign of 20 single family homes on 4.78 acres or land in tt!e R -1 zone located at the southwest corner of Victoria Street ar.3 Ramona Street - APN 202 - 181 -04. BACKGROUND: The applicant, Lightner L�° _'e };.iert, is requesting reviEN and approval of the redesign of 20 single family :tomes For Tract 10491, located at the southwest corner of Rome. *.a Street :,nd Victoria Street. The Tract Nap configuration with minimum 7200 square foot lots is not affected by this approval. The proposed three and four bedroom . elevations range in size from 1240 square feet to 1600 square feet. The building feature tile roofs with a variety of siding materials including wood shingles, wood siding, and stucco. All units have attached three car garages. Tne Design Review Committec reviewed the project and recommended revisions to the perimeter along Victoria Street and a minor alteration to ere elevat-;:o. with the appropriate r--visions. the Committee determined that the proposed designs are consistent with City standards. RECOMMENDATION: The Design Review Committee recomm°nds approval of the project with the conditions as indicated. If the Commission concurs, approval of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. I Respkctfully�itted, Ri tk qOmez� F y Tanner CJ.jr achments: Exh i bi+ Exhibit Exhibit Resolut °A° - Location Map "3° - Site Plan °C" - Elevations of Approval ITEM C 7W 7 _ r _ 9NO O�6X UI K' • itl <erG. tea[ WSLLL t4 irY /Rpr9R3 moo e.c. ..o it mac. ew sa�nei Tula � l9 NI�aONCf Wi.LL lttV. wa• . M1 o_ i—z -- PLPN Ya6aY V �L i.LTWI�Mtiw4 <�pia wv.iae I 1 cis srr. it 1ri�Cf • �1' coon wow¢ �•uy caw � PJiV Y�y f qqI 6I W� 71 Z O 1 C1 I CITY OF ITEti'I :-M IQ�9I -' LA Eil10.2 PL ANNII\IC v DnTM.1 EXHIBCi'• �!i3 "_— SCALE- 04 E 0 -&L .Ii,W- kiL. —.. t- Y� Mmr.• R= gets CFr-v OF RANCHO CUCANMO\GA PLANT INCY LIVISONT L� bra I { I I � � OI;1I I; II a � _ i✓ l �.i.b. R •aYi r•.nw. ..{ fl 1Y ib.v' Sw.•a�e, •YY, awi�� FRONT �'.�VOi,Q -! A �'�•30 -dv FCONT ITEM: !R I cr-R I -'UEK-� T,031ELt TITLE: sR F - parr EXHIBIT G - i SC,I.E: — v.c cas -• -1 CFr-v OF RANCHO CUCANMO\GA PLANT INCY LIVISONT L� bra I { I I � � OI;1I I; II a � _ i✓ l �.i.b. R •aYi r•.nw. ..{ fl 1Y ib.v' Sw.•a�e, •YY, awi�� FRONT �'.�VOi,Q -! A �'�•30 -dv FCONT ITEM: !R I cr-R I -'UEK-� T,031ELt TITLE: sR F - parr EXHIBIT G - i SC,I.E: — I I � I 1 ! L 7F I� sus. t ti F L. CIrFY OF rMNI: -TR I - Ceu(*A Knile , RAT CM CUCATI\ -GA TmE: Lwrr PLANNING DrV SiaN EXHIBIT. C-Z SCAL.E:. -- ,- /Galt. T!�a L pmt TT►lur 1• 711-1 IID DDI l�l LJ LJ L nn C��C�O DCi ❑n nn .... li r �r �• 1T0, v+q-} 4 T� i - _ � V.19}O• �lKa TT.K Fes» -.•7 C1- GNOTION CIrFY OF rMNI: -TR I - Ceu(*A Knile , RAT CM CUCATI\ -GA TmE: Lwrr PLANNING DrV SiaN EXHIBIT. C-Z SCAL.E:. -- b53 1 b"Iden I ji: qc a w.acac I �•b f4f M.cr. -�1. — — — �f•- -neap ne•or�) � _ wa r..+r•c.wamwoa. ae..c`�"O 1 �^ w oc c-� • a a� �. ccrG_ Y• ty.a *m► m —�� / �e•� zca,u .c.rNio ^...- 4f 4[tyy C, r. Ono � _! Fl OBI �in•<e w...r son •aao ,eee La+t.ta, �!� '. a y5/8'x V wsr.r. Tow - ` is M !w�•aa �.� CITY OF ITEM: —f a49 - x5+� aff a RANCHO CUCAMONGA T.-ju: I tz� PLkNI LNG DRrlSiQN EXHIBIT: G- �_ SCALE- — P^ C ^OV luO DW' Q a6 _� uTP �r q C <C�gv9 —0J °` u m.°. ^a c. Rc' Ni qv q••a qq � na i�ri N9 OV�` OF d� b N� O TL 6, .[LONG 9Z, V N — ° q m V. r G Q ' y d W` y ^_ C r L O ^p O C .9 aV6 « 9 u VS ^V Vd V apq a NYJ• .0 CS LN i C y r q b p V = Q M O `q_ q O` N= a U O q q L y Q a . j N W r n F NOU NCQ Or9 �9rD V LC =^ Oud ./2 J rSCV L d N O O > C p O S C^ y^ + l °9V PO ^9 LQ NC. dL LVV dJ b >— dVq C �V -pO �L .a.� ° L r C q � N L L �✓ q q ^ 9 O J ^ O d 6. r q ` 9 0 d= q 6 d N O d= L LOW O L c L G O P C r CCN = L VgrV wr tQ J N L • ^C 1 C OqN J�qO C~ OO,LC C C�/O �9 ,CZ= add LqC Lr OVgCO V �n dG6N N YE Ly 06 ' O O pO N t V 9 'g.. _ q O 2 d L« Nr V=y 'E�r a�dM 'id 9�vOTNE =N>E 9q W� PC aZi y= diJ yTV pO .L.r �9CC LZyL 9D 9N <O6 JqO C �t S F � V Ur T�0 p C $i wrOC u d bO � �� �9Gea unD ^n �.zi 5 Nn L9N P— __Ur > ^C ^PV VVC9 M 2^V O —r N C. 09Y DL ^J NyW.� p� E a c^ — t� V 9 V d J L'J V V a V „J — OL VL Cqy 6 D f C.Ln 6N6D 60V n` 6D HO.N — 6 fL.rilO NOO <V Jr9GV p —_^ 9 O N L �9t «+c c • q a cam. a� ccg S L O q Y O L V _V V 1 G V D T r N G F 1 9 OV O W 9Lt O V6^ N9 On_ 6V��_ OC H O r L V b q O V $ O C Z-2 O. r r q O w y L O �� r✓ V t r aC N N yL O N d O O d i> ^rte 6_ON C C G N L r^ C ^ 6 N 2.5 n"p ., pr n•'LN. .did m�° a °.v9 don zn N W d� L C —MF C P�q CSrL TLY. o _ 7;2- y+ 0 C O C N _ Oq0 yC)y' O 2 CD_ 9 LLO O. 90C QN ^��CCcO N N 'L L a 6 p V^ 6L— C9 NO N C vyE O JN F Adh �E C' CLO CO. O= OO CgOO �.j q o d —w EyO� Fc oL q2l a +qJ N \7 < 6 r 1 N E J r, ` i L Y W r C (• 1✓VgGC \O ayrL _ ONVT> L��� QVC q 9L AC O O�LP fT09 OL �� ` _ u 6 C y L.� V• N O� V Y m d J L 9 q L pOC V V P' {r N q.� 0 FF OZy.I F�'a q 06 'nV C 4 O G —Vdp _✓ J p-= qO q t L � i « � Y6 u p i i q pN CC9•r GG i q y dVDDDGGO q` 9CL d� j � G✓ P O NGOa• L IJ ON O G✓4 dC �pre•u Q•✓ 2i OSCL,C q� JJq 4 OC _N ✓LOew9 r • �C Gu (� V.' =� ✓MJ �iL r O V r 4q C.�p d r Lr yr � E 4 ✓ q« O P V �. N O S yd�> L 6 G r€ E C. V f0t O r qZ d ' y V O✓ q ^_Jyidtu✓ V A CL o P �TO'� N -~�.de✓� t OL ^� �✓ 9 4L ^ G � ✓ q� q� d O� r y` >� r ai 9 q P l �✓ D rn « r O L, p� � O d ✓ C � 9 � L wl q N P .LVn C y I V T N �� r V✓ L E N q C V ll C 6 r N J Y ✓ N � � G' q` E N` L 9> L b y = u T✓ c N F V O N C C q O m V C T O ✓a L � �E e nnp 'r C�arJ ar �u�3�G « ✓� Nq aLr OL � d.V. F� O A= p A✓ =� � CgCr „�60r y u L�60_06C NO.� A ESQ = �C =N�d q99 Vdq v a{ yqC �C A�a _ j L NY✓ �. GLL V`d9 Q✓✓S�✓O`O'PViV E V Y -1. � =GJ b t L CPL q ✓ q q C O C q� ✓EE b�'•=i•N Gym N•peL y0a yL C « =r= V�..0 Y6�OD qV N S ^_ 9�ODL V�`d�q•"' ZLOf dVV « a� O�G` V�N AOgV ` Oom' Y rH VNdCY � �'J^ r N «Q q.5 P OaL'= O nLrt n G ur A VI•J N ,VY N O Q y N ✓E m N y c�OgL TY O �� N✓ V LO 9✓ S O O_ L er+ rr y aS row mG LOV Y t�� l Y G� a � C C > C C ^ O p P « � Q q r O V Sr N r✓ O P V V V C M � `�� O � qi Y Y��' C N E _` c� ✓u�csi ew ` �eovq ac i `T o: o `a... c c✓° d t q� Z d O 2✓ N V� a � C r pL r L 6 p } y V d Y L n" r L ✓. L O m >Li9 -�- NL O �� V V Y � 9�L . x p�Vg60Ia=•I qLL Z^ LN HrM ✓ E L L Y� LON q CL per✓ •-. r �l � t9 �dOCV LN�q 10 WKGO L 6 6 VNOpZ i L O ^I ✓1 NI ^I pl A h� _ IL �� I 6 J O W 90 TG d 9 V ✓�« A O bP✓ �mi �e✓C1✓' i q✓ �" - D ✓ y D O O M G =mod � C Lyy « L V y �J a •C L «= O ✓ V r '� C � N A y C^ a` 6 � r q J ✓ > t' E L .-. O .J •Ge Y L C 72 L G ' y r O�CU N 9 LD PG J L Er VO.LL�Gp 6�NA[a� VDyN « C O V V D J p y A 9 Y r Y zol A q L N N y V 0 v LO g O O r ✓ E n y 0 6� E O q� Q C L. N B C V jVm V V q> c -cG x e a «g V, ✓ �cr.L. egqior��r... --^ v G°'r 9�aL OL VAV• OV�J✓ r� „C Q .. .g i i T a rqN✓ VC EEM �N_u M « .°. dcd�ua �'o � l _agyyi Gi'Jy �d ycyr.�tNc !Q� J Oq ✓ V gLOO pF� dub O 'N LN p N q C L G L ✓ �� 6' N C q Si a r L = P✓ U2 S V r L V D I L V C b p y .. q= i✓ q O r d r A � w � D s q g O L E d K G O w c c o V c '✓ C 4 L� ✓ V x « 7 N • O p q_ V` m G 9 G rr N 6 C L` C V q _✓ L y- L O � =p =✓ L j v O r V q� 6 � q� O U� may. 9y qy Ey � 4 T�NCC C�LDN n C p O 6✓ Vy?V V✓ 10 g A>> P O O q q N✓ •nV p O OL mL 9 V Cd O O C C G✓ Gd0 ✓ ^' r O N LEy.G�rV y C O N q O^ V y m� Y Cy Vpp L✓ O C`6d 9' N y q00� O N q�~L� ✓L GG L L �L p _ yE _�✓� p 6C y O J � L L✓ y d N O� ` O V O G Lp y L>. V O.•'C N PY OD . C ML LL �lVa Q =yCV aD p✓ l� L O A gNGm r V d C E E O r ✓ V � L � i� •Or - p S O O r V q N � j N >' 9 N d Fy L r a N T •Li• O �J• CD r J C L N V �N C > � S I l VOO . Ll � N � TC f ✓y9Q �Cr i �L,yC Nqp ow. � ✓N T� ��✓Or O NVL.y M� VdNN V Vpd � V� Tr C C C O O q q V I ` A r C P d C q 6 V• V r � q OY OA PO� -u p ✓VC u C d J A✓ �aL9 VJ .Oa .T• u N V E 'On G NN .V r' d C C Nx��JNL O YA✓(' M d a✓ 46 �6U q N O u___o tiN O G A � Lam' r O r C L X00 1. L ti •Oi• N „9NgON yej� L Q•r OC 6EJ6 L60 Gp 6�I V L ✓� u 1 N E J s �I c 0 0 z q u V L V e� a q FO 6 y L aDl 9 .O •Id u N o V L L O N L 0 ° O 1 C IO V L O O C � I q ^•V I u O N E � C aL • C q • -J CL t' V Ow0O ¢ai uo l� Il dy ✓L dr � V L1 'LPN C a —1 qu Cyr V L T•G. S] 0 9 C O — O V g d N q J • q 1 C C E _a • 1211 d�N_ ✓ ^ N K C � „ 1 NL ✓N Lr N V V . OC>� MO1V5 G ✓ A C M� C Y P r q L } L r L ^ V ^ e O d n w °�qq °OtP q L n r M add — • •Lw >L u'a ^q —� ZC 9^ ^ V V ON C4. ✓ COU Od J4M �iJC CO. 9 q O•r• V O �Q� — G 0 0yN ✓d 7� N. y d c P V C H L °� N a N N V� q 2 y 6 F°9 L T_ p 9 v ., E t .a• 6 y C 0 ^� ^6 V V yT O V r q G ✓ d O E N Cq O C y9d9 ✓0= =L °p Y CV d •9 y LV • d C — N G s' T V Q 9 i ' V O✓ Y ` j V 9 qN q ~ 9 a y O Q LO aE- pp E i r r PY n✓ v� N °K � N C c" y��a �� tzV9 1 q =9N �Vj L c C O F L C N� ��N ✓ — — C9 .q �C O'i M C L'^ q yY• �O ^at ig ry q ✓c�Qy V q r ~ r_d a r�vOC 4✓ O' E NN J 9! u M 9 q— G� � ZYd O GN �` L L °OY M� Tt N2O O O� _9 Tt• �Qq 9�F r• •O. NVP qC^ 6N Cy GC fCT °aS O M J da LagYV G9 r °vT L >Vq Cr r ^Y N2 Od NLLLL 9^ d G L i ✓U a�E x • VNIq�� S>T J9 9p g01V u1 C 4 c A a P a 9 2G CNaT LCO la VVTnN•A Viyi 4E V L ^j y�C yCV - LV9E Ey�W ✓°^ C O P�NO L c �" w� 3 L AM `p6 `r ••f Cay � T- V ° O Lc � CGp d T ✓./°i 9� rL "Lq qr V` P NL= �� yy1 ✓ • � _ar A A q P 9 — O C r V a:5 P -Y YLpAyV _ �Cr yd NOV -� Cc9 aO L �y d 66 9 °Tn •L O — Ep [p Cam°— C °L GN Jqr ^ J iC t > GO'°p` �I LV Wes^ L >WO rN r6 g C q i a Gm )t p OC L O.N N >q p N ^qI - Y a r6 c 20^ r q ^I NI c4I C Y r C 9 p ! ^ d V V q • 0 C � nOLLCL qa9� N ^e y eN ^ —JC —O °r CO�C� `w =4` Eaa En `O � u uwai = �•C Ar CYC� d z q u V L V e� a q FO 6 y L aDl 9 .O •Id u N o V L L O N L 0 ° O 1 C IO V L O O C � I q ^•V I u O N E � C aL • C q • -J CL t' V Ow0O ¢ai uo l� Il dy ✓L O'L � V L1 'LPN C a —1 C^ Cyr 9L L V —V S] 0 9 C O — O V g d N q J • q 1 L q_ E _a • P ✓ ^ N K C � „ 1 NL ✓N Lr N V V . OC>� MO1V5 G ✓ A C M� C Y P r q L } L r L ^ V ^ e O d n w °�qq °OtP q L n r M add N • •Lw >L u'a ^q —� ZC 9^ ^ V V pO 3 ✓ COU Od J4M V— ��� 9 q O•r• V V �Q� — V L L N �? q c P V C H L 9 N a 9 C Y d i r d T_ p Y v •J � pPL y d ^� ^6 V V yT O d r q Q V✓ E N Cq C y9d9 ✓0= =L °p Y CV d •9 y LV • d C — N G s' T V Q 9 i ' V O✓ Y ` j V 9 G q ~ 9 a y O Q LO O• d C pp E i r r PY V Cg01 N Yf V y V q vMOCd N C q L d L• 1 q =9N �Vj L c C O F L C N� ��N ✓ — — C9 .q �C O'i M C L'^ q yY• �O ^at a=�'t ry q ✓c�Qy V q a a� c c 09y0 L � ayV V ° O�V ^ V L °OY Z• VLC O �Qq 9�F r• •O. NVP qC^ 6N Cy GC fCT °aS O M J da LagYV G9 r °vT L >Vq Cr r ^Y N2 rV.� VC L i ✓U a . x • VNIq�� S>T J9 9p g01V u1 C 4 c A a P a 9 2G CNaT LCO la VVTnN•A Viyi 4E V L ^j y�C yCV NL LV9E Ey�W ✓°^ P�NO L �� dy a9 .V CC a'Vj d Cay � 'O 'Op NC C —YC qyC � CGp d T ✓./°i 9� rL "Lq qr V` P NL= �� yy1 ✓ • � _ar A A q P 9 — O C r V Y� YLpAyV _ �Cr yd 9L N^ VV= dP� L� 9 °Tn •L O — N Cam°— qq CLr 6L b9O t C1 a �L9 VGd G )t p OC L O.N N >q p N n - Y nN r6 c 20^ r q d 2 - O. a 0 0 V L T G Y J V a C C Y r C 9 p � N� ^ d V V q • 0 C � nOLLCL qa9� N ^e y eN ^ —JC —O °r CO�C� `w =4` Eaa En `O uwai rai �•C Ar CYC� d � ~•y OV C — O Q �Q' "9 S —d 6 —C N N 9 •3 N� Q 9 C J L�^ y� r N q Q N� l L 6 N Z N V V Q 9 '� O i V l] Y - M PI f M f U �I O W l C s n. 9 Gp d L r E v P d9 G__V ✓J _P yb0 L_9 am'J b L i :::E = " z o y 0� C a _ W G °a � V PN � ✓ E � q y E� T N r S 9 9 ✓ 9 Ap L 9 O r V O d VP PVO 4!Q =P 4 ^PV_40 ` y 9 Tpl D +O „ q P yr� Yq .-O-V r FO_ Vat_�d0 dW nCd L �rV >ypDL L a >4 r v Cc` Mr4 L OG G W 90 L2]d � S✓00. 9qm WjJCq Ot� >G �V 400 drG£ C +L >'� CL.r�q �� O P✓ = OGi q Q ^ y L Y C C � ` 6 C C q y yGI V� y✓ n a U d a N O D9 W Jt C~9 q C iO.�p 66p Nr•J ^G4 ^y9N7i P �O O d w d q 9✓ C_ a N C -,Mc. N O w T` ✓ i0y TuJi � r _ G9 VVY tlD✓ 6!r L `dLY� D p Q'9 ✓6 r Z EO O O 4 4 ° °� °y 9 l 9 � �� �• ` ` O Q r N 19j` G C VCCj a tb O NpM cyy LNGL VOA 1w4 .0 dL d0 � 9w•V G! L E6�V_ aNE O��V �+ `C `i1' `y a✓ D�a N L `u4 Y�E V N Y. Lu Cf ).' W � O N J 9 N l` r O✓ � 9 v! � b N C� 9 _ ✓� � _ L ✓ V b g O 6 N C O V N� Gh� y Y G O!DV N � V M 9v _9 Cr D Cd�Vw Ny M� V� y� O� N= O. Gr 9 ^p AO✓ N .� O`� a 9 C � D d+ O!9 q i✓ a T ^ C N E q L 9_ N G P>? V V P O L v 9 p D G N O O 9 L d p W O V O D ✓ y �� ^` P ^✓ = LW PM P _C T_b O >� G O L r ✓a V C G✓ b O� C NYC +��ff( +1 G c dq0 LV NUJ 0 A��� �G1r -+ '9 ✓ OA J.�e b�V p V Ji GLC� NI VVN 699G C d` OO.�E^ '•J WOyp _r 4 OWd. 60UVO �9 2 >I OI tq NV! D q O vys p o �� \�• NI 19 Z ~I � I � S W J ✓+ �r v p v Qr � d V d� ti V p! v d L T T d P 0 C =raPC OL YW! =� y�Od V rVa�L q ✓q4 6L Zr; 9'L +LOGS _ +Y vO ^ O J .> r W VL 96L id M Om .9 91 q+OW pEL�y!iF ^ =PV SOLD O .G va a O! o va LV✓ OS nY. _Ova ✓ 7 9b�9a Zvn _W 4G LJ d y'j pY4C V v i N jS1 q 9O-ra N O G✓ GO' + p!` Zy ap p !.E pGS C w• 9 `w 9 L °'.b.�a C G q C 49 C' Y�UN `PL ✓4 Yd V N rC ^V dD LL V^ ...N q a r ✓�Yr d NBC mV VV N DO. 90 _TFp V d7G p >� 6 9 ^G �' N N G a Ge O E R^ q O a E'Y ^ y ✓ c C LIOjCU bGa BOG V O �d Ldi Ow �C SV ✓r 9gEDC q �. p1�0 Cq a�a O NG GunO p V- d V W .� 044✓ r 6 Z C•.r 00 V G V W yc a D y C✓ V✓ e y 9i N� L �� V LG P c 9 ^J V q y F 6 ^ J _ OI N= y aC Z� _ GIV- OD d�yD OIO El ✓ nN�V N 4OVw !�� G E u! V r uy d ( V ^^ 2Z• � Or r =~ � L C j d9 M O C P jm br � E ✓< J �= O Or C r� V� r O�✓ rW q ✓ V d Ld D �M 9 d � q ^ dN E9 -� aCC = •_ C✓ PE�y .i..q ✓ y tl P+ V PN L rV' GI d9dP d � O ' J U N G d vO.d9 f q= r O V qi q =L/ S L W N G = ^ V W 6 J GD Ir N 6 �` O •1 N G V L V W U V O G t9 � G Z } y I Z; A, �I ill m 7 Y s n. 7I T O 6 h I Nd —y.- ^y T Q�N AI �� N V V V O V 9 J y �T = C Q O C ✓ ^ V w d N � �- � � G N V d N V jF4y pyyC N �^ L6 LVq d�°rd qC d N q ^N pCp `� t N 9 d ^^ q« u pj V vOV LV0. �� `Y r 0 T O L L T v r O d E a q � r.. L L N r V O 'to ti C C ° 0 0 0 a uL d q q G C 9 9 O uaA O Nd —y.- ^y T Q�N �� N V V V O V 9 J y Q = C Q O C ✓ ^ V w d N � �- � � G N V d N V jF4y pyyC N �^ L6 LVq d�°rd qC d N q ^N pCp `� t N 9 d ^^ q« u pj V vOV LV0. �� `Y r C V 4 Y I N E.✓ x cam^ �✓ OrV 6 G O v q ryG C 0� —Y N C Cd J RVr ✓� q V CURL M� C6 L � p N��Y N✓ —, V�r =q_. V n o Oc'. N r Y -uLx q q C R ^ L ^J' r u✓i a E y rn iCp ydado R =oE qt L «y' >kc.�. o¢ V9 QP OLr RV 4V« 6q 60L 'C a ^_YUC e Vy q ni �G Nn C =BOG P a L V 9« A � L R J « W N y q kd �✓ �1W ` q p r >. d i —0 0 2 2 d✓ a .�. M — i 1 �.J. "�- L N r r Q W w N w-s _ e c i✓ GV°. d 0 qi NI �I �! ml Pi C O O NL9 ^y T Q�N N V V V O V 9 J y Q 9 C Q C ✓ ^ V w d N � �- � � G N V d N V jF4y pyyC N �^ L6 LVq d�°rd qC d N q ^N pCp `� pj V vOV LV0. �� `Y r C V 4 Y I N E.✓ x cam^ �✓ OrV 6 G O v q ryG C 0� —Y N C Cd J '�. ✓� q e _ L � _ N9N✓ N✓ =q_. V n o Oc'. N r Y -uLx q q C R ^ L ^J' r u✓i a E y V9 QP OLr RV 4V« 6q 60L n a h e o v r v O: v C T a L L q ° M n N� CI q J n a � G � i � u L -Y d -- v i L N^ d M = C N V L d W y ew a N V i Y r r d J v y �YWO" L o C � R O G N OLr C L q r C y N q E dZ v i ^ C v A O C 9 y N M'd'r C O O p 6C ^y > C T u n °a i N « 9 tea_ =d J > N� _ L ✓� i l0 m d d S � -y _ r I y - N I 9 r � N O O L R V 9 c « e d f C N a ;e- M u 9 ✓ S 9 O O n qq. d C G a q qu o a N C q q q N q l l I N e d L V C q q N V d . O L P r x w 9 7 C C 4 < N M q C Z i x q L Cy r P E O C W ✓ E Y N d ✓ 9 C P V x oa ° b N N d L O 1y ✓ O V M N A 1 l Gn d 7 TZ w� G OV r firer Or O C J d p F r r ^I Q ✓ C A d i L G y N r^ j C E 6 y ` V Nr d G� E V O A Pi c APT °cy� G LAm cl p4 Nc yAt Y C O A 9 > d V O d V O N^ C d �^ ar'� p LL G' 6 p 6JL°iD C p '. .2 2 y A 9 Pr L• y r O L C A^ O u N C P U V "2Z 2! I J'^ 000 N r n d y` N —N Aro r • C ` « r O P O. c J q Trdi A C y V u Y A A P _ y pC V der i O l 4G «y C oq D I '^w �„ °^ D Ll `cam LT ^•'ey. �Qm Op >A yd I vN tCLy r_ �9 •. P` �� DP p Z r d L S� A C CLL OI G'•O c L d� J PO w N r C Sy NM DO' •.' I 9 d N _N > A LL G C A C V O d T- Q C y V = V r OJ= 6LQ pAAO Cy0 C� r0 _r rJ �ryit NA A C N Gr V A•.'F A lye LL np CVyI it .. S L�== LO a n.• _ I� ^y Oy r_V ^ G 62 6� �iJ WW pJ 1 A =I 1 S O E u RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING THE REDESIGN OF 20 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES FOR TRACT 10491, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RAMONA STREET AND VICTORIA STREET WHEREAS, en the 25th day of April, 1983, a complete application was filed by Lightner Development, applicant for the above - described project; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee has recommended approval of said project, with appropriate conditions; and WHEREAS, the project point rating exceeds the minimum threshold as require-' by the Growth Management Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: FINDINGS: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere wi-h the use and enjoyment of neighboring exist' =g or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. 2. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding area and will create a harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated in the Generdl Plan, of the City. 3. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and -color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain s reasonably adequate level of maintenance. 4. That the proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfart, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 5. That the proposed development will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. E. 7 Resolution No, Page 2 SECTION 2: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Design Review for Tract 10491 is approved subject to tE—e-fo—TTowing con itions and attached standard conditions: 1. The perimeter wall along Victoria Street shall be redesigned to incorporate a greater variety of design elements such as: additional pilasters; a more massive trim cap; and /or changes to materials, colors, and textures. The final design shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Brick veneer shall be provided on the f,, ont right corner of elevation "B" for the 1240 sgjar,� foot unit. 3. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevations facing the street upgraded with additional wood trig around the windows dnd wood siding or plant -ons where appropriate. 4. The Developer shall comply with all conditions of approval for Tract No. 10491. 5. The Developer shall include provisions to accommodate future front yard irrigation systems. As a minimum, such provisions siiall include the installation of Schedule 40 PVC pipe loops under driveways and sidewalks. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1983. PLANNING COPSMISSI0N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA BY: Herman Rempe , Chairman M TEST: Secretary of the Planning ommission El Resolution No- Page 3 L'J I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of June, 1963, by the following vote- to --ait: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: C"ISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E 0 1 Ci 1'Y OF RANTCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 8, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner By: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -12 - ROBERT MANUFA TURIN - THE eve opment of -a-72760 square foot ware ouse o Ice building addition to an existing industrial complex on 4.7 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial category (Subarea 9) located at the southeast corner of Jersey Boulevard and Utica Avenue - APN 209 - 143 -06. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration B. Purpose-7 Construction of a 32,760 square foot warehouse and o ice wilding addition C. Location: The southeast corner of Jersey Boulevard and Utica Avenue D. Parcel Size: 4.7 acres E. Existing Zoning: Industrial Area Specific Plan, Minimum Impact Heavy Ir. ustrial category (Subarea 9) F. Existing Land Use: Manufacturing G. Surroundin Land Use and Zonin : Nort. - acant, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) South - Industrial buildings, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) East - Industrial building, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) West - Multi Tenant industrial buildings, Industrial Park category (Subarea 6); Industrial, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) ITEM D Development Review 83- 12pobert ManufF;:turing Planning Commission Agenda June 8, 1483 Page 2 H. General Plan Lesi nations: Project Site - Heavy Ir. ustrial North - Heavy Industrial South - Heavy Industrial East - Heavy Industrial West - Industrial Park I. Site Characteristics: —two buildings totaling 70,300 square feet currently exist on the subject property. The 4.7 acre site slopes to the south at approximately 1 1/2 percent. II. ANALYSIS• A. General: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the app scant and is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. This review is for environmental review only. Staff will complete the development review approval, pending final changes in the project design as requested by the Committees. B. Impacts: Development of the project will increase the amount of water runoff from the property and generate additional traffic. However, these increases are not viewed as significant adverse impacts since the surrounding streets and flood contral faciiities exist or will be provided to handle th_ projected increases. III. RECOMMENJATInN: Based upon site analysis and the Initial Study, this project will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment. If the Commission concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration for this project would be in order. Resp tfully submitted, R'Ck Oomez C,ty Oianner r RG:Cj: jr I Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Initial "A" - Location Map "B" - Site Plan and Grading Plan Study, Part I 11 �. • Sr, n UU B. I - g LU •t,T i�'/`_ •-r r � � ' '4'SP4°Ou?d' `S �t " +a . t .r y �,Y, _ ts'�`�1i9'i••t : h eE a1. f a + " / r i �,+ e w1 • i ' •• � `�1� 'y^^�.��--^w,. �i y���!!��'b�+��� a {{c�?cU:�� ^i j_ .?��.•��1►•�. ae��u,��y .J ""�w�v�.o�.::.�.�rar�, P�q!. ��}�.� . = `e.,��.,�y,. =��p' + ARROW O • •Zi.•.14L.O:J, °i�t0 • '.YR^�..o10' .: ���.�OY,r(,.iC'.:1':- • "�M' -��ir w .t rl �t �Sf4 Y'.p � "• r 'lG'S� eew. � • • i 1 1t, • •�lv �G4.t✓pSt `yTUfSt3:.4r'c L]oCr1" ,asSPl�eraran�4vf�n -�ia2 er.4'+r'.sLaa�r��o, � �d �u�,'"f Rst•�'°°•,r to crl Y*7't"l 'T,;�iMt':�itay��y'Tr"`1' .. � u'� yi`'�''s�'�"� • �• x...... r�i`� t, ✓ 1fY'�z:.. '�:��_Jy.� Y, N' '1u�i i+r� f r'; '�. �, a,.. y o �r • 12W R.O.W. 0000 •• Access Points as, or Isms R.G.W. Regional 4 RAIL SERVICE Lam-^� special streebm4pe/ t-+-t-4--t-- Proposed Fire Statkml metw Parcel Ones and lot contiquartions We Shown se approxitmation only. iTheskesshom maynotbecorron"yowle nor is the locatior site Specific. The depiction of a one is an indication 00 a projected future need that may be adjusted over time as the City develops. IIIA� ' = I. r Ezi n-?E "w-%T, P ENT CITY 1 RANCHO CUCA�IMONL TGA PLANNNG DP%r SnN E NUUH EXHIBIT= �g�r ALE, - 0 El CITY OF RANCHO CuCAMOAGA 1141TIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by appl ;cant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee wili meet and take action no later than tea (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further inf tion concerning the proposed project. PRrZ CT TITLE: Addition to S rtictnr -P APPLICANT'S NAMEr ADDRESS, TELEPHOIE: Robert *Ianufactv.ring, Inc., NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: John MacL n 17�D (714) 987 -4654 16667 Jersg Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga CA 9 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCZL NO.) 10667 Jersey Bo;,11gvard Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91736 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FRCX LOCALr REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Local Building Permit I -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 0 L'ESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Addition to Existing Stju-ture ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 4.7 acre, existing building _ 52,000 and 17.500 square feet addition 32.000 square feet DESCRIB:: THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Presently in industrial area, will landscape to suit local Is the project part of a larger project, cne of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact' I -2 L� WILL THIS PROJECT: fy YES NO Create a substantial charge in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for _ municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many ?_ X 6. Create- the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or exp losives, Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: residenttialeunits,ocomplete the sform tonnthe of next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to t'.,E best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented ate true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date 4- 21 -U Signature i Title Vice President / General Manager 0 John MacLyman 1-3 E, El. 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 8, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner By,: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner &I FA SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE t %Nbt CHRISTESON - A c ange of zone from A- Limite a es Agr�cu tune to C -2 (General Business Commercial) for 13.1 'doulevardland Haven Avenue - APN 1077 -401 01,r 03. Foothill Related File: CUP 83 -07 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of zone change request B. Purpose: Development of business park (Exhibit "8 ") C. Location: Northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue Txhibit "A") D. Parcel Size: 13.1 acres E. Existing Zoning: A -1 (Limited Agriculture) F. Existing Land Use: Abandoned winery G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: (Exhibit "C ") Manufacturing) North - South Vacant; - Vacant; MR (Restricted MR (Restricted Manufacturing) East - Vacant; A -1 (Limited Agriculture) West - Vacant; R -3 and A -1 H. General Plan Designations, roject ite - ommercia North - Commercial South - office East - Community Commercial West - Commercial and Industrial Park ITEM E Zone Change 83- O1 /Christeson Planning Commission Agenda June 8, 1983 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: Property is the former Garrett Winery site, a portion of which is designated as a historic landmark. Six buildings exist in deteriorating condition; Eucalyptus windrow exists along Haven along with other mature trees. Property surrounds a General Telephone facility and abuts Deer Creek Channel to the west. J. Applicable Regulations: C -2 zone permits retail, office, bank, an restauran uses. II. ANALYSIS- A. General: The proposed zone change to C -2 is consistent with the General Plan designation of Commercial. The developer, C`..isteson, has submitted plans for a business park consisting of office, banking, and restaurant uses (see related staff report - CUP 83 -07). Exhibit "B" shows a conceptual master plan of 10 buildings, including preservation of the main winery tower. B. Desi n Review Committee: The Committee recommends approval of the master site pan subject to resolution of the concerns listed in detail in the staff report for CUP 83 -07. C. Environmental Review: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and found that this zone change will not have a significant effect on the environment. If the Commission concurs with such findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. D. Historic Preservation Commission: The proposal was presented to the Commission on May 5, 1983. The Commission set a public hearing for June 2, 1983 in accordance with the Historic Preservation Ordinance. The Commission is required to forward a recommendation to the City Council. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project site is appropriate in size, shape and access to accommodate future development consistent with the General Plan and compatible with the surrounding area. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. 11 .I Zone Change 83- 01 /Christeson Planning Commission Agenda June 8, 1983 Page 3 11 V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider aTl material and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding, adoption of the attached Resolution recommending approval of the zone change request and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Resdectfullybmitted, ckW10— (Jf mez ty Planner RG:DC:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Surrounding Land Use and Zoning initial Study, Part I Resolution 11 El C,9~t G- , 1 r 0 �uf�jEcT F7.1 FOOT VII (.4 W(_I t,r;v.AD All, / d N075 : * Cca.iNOTES INACTIJ57 04;5 � \1 6 1 1 i i i _pLAnfNi;'D . COMMWCijtkL. .,.DEVEI,OMAw%IT CITY OF ,�: -� 3'® / RANCID CUCAMONGA TITLE: v PLANNING 1 ViSM EXHIBrr- dwe SCALE- NOR TH p El 11 CITY OF RA\CH0 CUCAMO \GA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INF'O'F ATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: 587.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must b2 completed a:.d submitted to the Development Review Coa+.mittee thro-:ga the department wnere the project application is *lade. Upon receipt o£ this application, the Environmental Analvsis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at -which time the project is to be heard. The Cornit*_ee will hake one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no significant environ- mental ianact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact P.eport will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project_ PROJECT TITLE: Vir ?,nia Dare Business Center APPLICAN''S NWIE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: hri-teson investment Co., 17922 witch Avenue, Irvine, California 92714 714 - 540 -2851 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE COAIACTED CONCERNING T141S PROJECT: Don or Jon Christe-zon - same address as above LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRCSS AISM ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Northwest corner of Foothill Bculevard and Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonca, CA LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AM FEDERAL AGENCIES AND T.:.'=: AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Zone change Y -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTIO`' DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A see attached 11 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA ALM SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING P\TD PROPOSED BUILDIZIGS, IF ANY: Approximately 13.1 acres; approximately 528,000 s.f.; proposed buildings anticipated square footage- 170,000 s.f. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRO\ ' =IrAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE I?QCLL7.77::G IlZrOR:•LATION OD7 TOPOGRAPHY, Y, PLAITIiS (TREES) , ANI -MALS, ANt CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SUR?.OUNDING PROPERTIES, P.i`D THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXIST11•3 STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NTECESSARY SHEETS) P_ flat piece of land with six buildings now in various stages of deterioration, all of which have lost their roofs, windows, 'annrs and anv framed structure within. The surroundina land was once a productive vineyard; now in a generai state oz cry The property surrounds —a site owned by General Telephone Co. consisting of an area 150 by 312 s.f.; this site _as built building.- On the east border of the property, fronting on Haven, are a series of Eucalyptus trees, row planted as an ancient windbreak. These thees are in the neiuhborhood of 60 to 70 feet in heiaht. The existing remains of the six buiidinas mentioned above were once use nor the purpose or making table and sacramental wine and was known as the Virgini Dare Winery. It was constructed in 9• an was designed Arthur Benton, who also was the architect for the famous Mission inn in Riverside. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a vhole have significant environmental inapact1 The project is planned to be built in either two or three srpgpg _ hilt' h:,; i i- from a „aerPr pi ,n as herein presented. Init_ ally, it is planned to begin with several restaurants and banking or financial institutions; ultimately leading to in development of office buildings with some unique retailing involved. I- 2 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The property is described as being approximately 13.1 acres in size; the front in an irregular shape bounded on the west by Deer Creek channel with approximately 935.86 s.f. fronting on Foothill Boulevard to the south and 900 s.. on Haven Avenue fronting to the east and having approximately a 584 foot common border with a vacant vineyard property to the north. The topography of the land is flat and consists of a grouping of buildings once known as the Virginia Dare Winery and more fully described as six cernent and earth farm buildings of one to three stories. The buildings are in delapidated condition due to the closing of the business in the early 1950 °s caused by econoric conditions and a fire. 0 9 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES K�X X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change municipal services (police, sewage, etc.) ! (No more than by any =ommercial activity.) x 4. Create changes in the exist general plan designations? in existing in demand for fire, water, would be created ing zoning or X 5= Remove any existing trees? how many? approx. — 3U_ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fla,:.mables or explosives? Explanation of any = answers above: 3. There is to be an increase in services because the land is being converted- rq� non -use to a commercial use. 5. Trees will be removed to create a window to the project and to allow for ingress an Pgraea rn takP They are also in the way of street and sidewalk improvements_ Several palm trees 'Planted in the ear 1930's will tower. IMPORT A= z LIM Jf If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnishes above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial. evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belie-f- I further understand tl-a t additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee_ Date I -3 Signature Titae u RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 83 -01 REQUESTING AOCAAT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOW.ILL BOULEVARD ACRES LOCATED AND HAVEN AVENUE WHEREAS, on the 7th day of April, 1983, an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and 1983, the Planning Commission held a to Section 65854 of the California WHEREAS, on the 8th day of June, duly advertised public hearing pursuant Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following figs: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in t1ne surrounding area; and 2. s That the gnificant proposed mpact onnethehaenvironment not have nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the existing and proposed General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that andsrprooject sss not c e a NegativefDeclaration adverse on June 8,0 environment 1983 NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the C recommends approval on the 8th h day Cucamonga hereby June. 1983, Zone Change No. 83 -01. 2. C The ty Planning Council Caprove0nand hereby adopt recommends Ch Change No- 8i-61. the 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 9 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8T11 DAY OF JUNE, 1983. Resolution No. Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Herman Rempe , Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Panning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of June, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 CJ Ll 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 8, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: 1977 l t1KSJlC�Vn - n1c ucacw�n.n .. -- -__ _ . _ Center, a us�ness park consisting of office, banking, and restaurant uses comprising 10 buildings on 13.1 acres of land in the A -1 zone (C -2 pending) located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN 1077 - 401 -01, 03. Related File: Zone Change 83 -01 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Conceptual approval of master site plan and gra ing p an B. Purpose: Development of business park, including partial restoration of Garrett Winery C. Location: Northwest corner of Foothill and Haven (Exhibit °A °) D. Parcel Size: 13.1 acres E. Existing Zoning: A -1 (Limited Agriculture) F. Existing Land Use: Abandoned Winery G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Nort - Vacant; MR 'Restricts Manufacturing) South - Vineyard; MR (Restricted Manufacturing) East - Vineyard; A -1 (Limited Agriculture) West - Vineyard; R -3 and A -1 H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Cormercial North - Commercial South - Office East - Community Commercial West - Commercial and Industrial Park ITEM F Conditional Use Permit 83- 07 /Christeson Planning Commission Agenda June 8, 1983 Page 2 11 I. Site Characteristics: Property is the former Garrett Winery site, a portion o which is designated as a historic landmark. Six buildings exist in deteriorating condition; land slopes southward at a 2 percent grade; property surrounds a General Telephone facility; a Eucalyptus windrow exists along Haven Avenue along with other mature trees throughout site; Deer Creek Channel abuts westerly project boundary. J. A2 licable Regulations: The C -2 zone permits retail, tinanciai, office, and restaurant uses. Certain features of the Garrett Winery are designated as historic landmarks pursuant to ordinance 70. II. ANAL`fSIS• A. General: The master plan, Exhibit "8 ", proposes 10 buildings, eight of which will be connected by a pedestrian path with an overhead arbor. A model will be presented to illustrate how the main winery building will be preserved. Specific site plan. and elevations will be required for development review prior to development of each building or phase. Access will be provided from Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard by a main interior loop road, and a secondary access point on Foothill at Deer Creek Channel. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee recommends approval of t Fe — master plan subject to the following revisions: o The site plan should be revised to etain the full Regional Trail width along the east side of Deer Creek Channel per City Council adopted design standards (Resolution 81 -93) , and 5 -10 feet of landscaping between the trail and parking spaces. o The one -way access road located et the southeast corner of the project shall be screened with a combination of berming and landscaping. A vine covered arbor may be required if this road functions as a bank drive -thru facility. The applicant has provided sections through these areas, Exhibits "E" and "F ", to address the Committee's concerns. C. Development Review Committee: In the past, it has been ommission policy to require landscape planters or tree wells approximtely every seven parking stalls to provide shade and visually break -up large expanses of parking areas. The General Plan contains the following tree planting guidelines (page 153): E Conditional Use Permit 83- 07 /Christeson Planning Commission Agenda June 8, 1983 Page 3 "Strips between rows of parking stalls; planters should extend into a parking stall occasionally to break up the straight rows. Trees are to be planted a distance of 10' less than the tree's diameter at maturity on center. A sufficient number of trees shall be planted such that when they are matured they will shade 50 percent of the parking area at solar noon on August 21 (1 p.m. Daylight Savings Time). This entails, at a minimum, planting trees at the required spacing in all strips between parking stalls." Therefore, the Committee recommends that the site plan be revised accordingly, particularly along the westernmost row of stalls adjacent to Deer Creek Channel. D. Historic Preservation Coranission: As shown on Exhibit "G", the site contains six bui ings, three of which are designated as historic landmarks. A portion of the main building, the winery tower, and an auxiliary building will be preserved and /or restored. The proposal was presented to the c Cheering n for May 5, 1983. The Commission set a public June 2, 1983. The Commission will forward their recommendation to the 1, in accordancepwiithlordinancee to approval by 70. E. Environmental Review: Based upon the 'initial Study, the project wi not ave a significant effect upon the environment because of the mitigation measures below: Impact: Reduction in absorption rates ami increase in surface water runoff. Mitigation: Storm drains nd water. structures will be provided to Impact: Increase in streets. Mitigation: Haven Avenue widened and areas will be traffic volumes on surrounding and Foothill off-street will parking fully improved; provided. A City Planner �G:DC:jr Conditional Use Permit 83- 07 /Christeson Planning Commission Agenda June 8, 1983 Page 4 III. IV. V. Impact: Mitigation Impact: Mitigation: Alteration to historic resources. Structures designated as historic be preserved and /or restored. Increase in existing noise levels. Construction activity is temporary return to acce t b FACTS FOR FINDINGS: p a le levels after provisa ' �stent project, together provisions a the Zoning Ordnance, and will the public health or surrounding properties. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been in T e Dail pert newspaper, were sent to property owners within To date, no correspondence has been the project. RECOMMENDATION: It is landmarks will and levels !vill completion. with the Conditions of Plan and applicable not be detrimental to advertised as a public hearing Property posted, and notices 300 feet of the project site. received either for or against consi er a material and recommended that the Planning consideration the Commission Wean on this project. I Commission conditions of approval support the facts for finding such issuance of a Negative Dec aration would be attached Resolutio and appropriat and Attachments: tted, Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Illustrative Site Plan Exhibit "p" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Haven Section Exhibit "F" - Deer Creek Channel Section Exhibit - Desi Hated Initial Stud g Historic Landmarks Resolution y' Part I Of Approval with Conditions e. 11 1] ADDENDUM TO INITIAL STUDY, PART II CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -C7 2 b. The project will significantly increase surface water runoff due to impervious surfaces, thereby reducing absorption rates. Storm drains and inlet structures will be provided to safely channel water. 7 b. The project will be a substantial alteration of the existing abandoned winery and vineyards. However, the project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of Commercial. 8 a,b,c The project will increase traffic volumes and necessitate new streets and parking facilities. Haven Avenue will be widened to include additional through lanes and turning lanes. Foothill Boulevard will be improved to full width. Adequate parking facilities will be constructed. 9 a. Construction will necessitate removal of several existing ® winery buildings. Those structures designated as a historic landmark will be preserved. 10 e. Construction activity will result in significant increases in existing noise levels. Increases will be sporadic and temporary in nature; therefore, noise levels will return to acceptable levels after construction is completed. 1 J Q r. n .. � ��. 4 '. l' 14� `� I ;, y:r. ,! ... '''r. . C �, PARKING'.. EKING REQUIRED � ' , ias . tARS 'OFFICE /FMMC1AL 0/2DD3, > .�YL ` a .. REMONING Ol 0 `. KITCHEN (112DO) . 31 • i - .• _ * PARKMG .PIok)ED :Ua%towocT ' .'^ _`m • .CARS El BUILDING,- "DA►T'A � FINANCIAL ` xS� 000 ­RESTAURANT = . c CITY OF RAINCHO CUO\- NlO'NGA PLANNING DIVISKI 1 TITLE: EXHIBIT: SCALE, �� OWN � I a E 0 I � E� lYj � II I ! f' I II'i1;11I1 :I::I'{I - i'i awv a� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAOMONGA PLANNING DIVISIQN M 1 u 717 C 1 i ,1111, :.r &= -"- t� 111 i ` hJ ltlll�l U�II �� wd. 1 �l 111;11 i 1 11 NORTH Q -� /�vi90 � h9�✓06 �1.flE t�/�j? 5y5T.�� y o.' CITY ■{/`�,OF���� ■ //���� ��%A� `�/ ``l ^_N+ �MEENI: � 9i 0 ®7 `� �l`T�i� �V V VTV� TNIO- \TVA a i `l LE PLANNING DIVISION E.Xtil ! C= __E; ___ A SCALE: NfM= i✓G � KPAIL -. 1 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCATIO \'GA PL- INNING DIVISION Q�� �H -G off/ Fay G.G�E. %2 cr,'Alovlv�L • ITEM: lo� 1p Ir 3 0.6 — Trslam: M�, ,WAM! �ot3 EXHIBIT: Latex. ..u. m s eu. L..00..001 ...DU.a.oDa i o •Y• El A ® Y• e. A{� Y4 O• OYw �.n e.�0J er .CIP�� w00 F-7 • 1 1 p4qp L w � s�. •e=:::iai J C-•e.e � 4AOO••o• H [ .e .a� • ••4 ea so aC ..00. u.O . vo9 Dv. O: v4D .e00 9ss D00000. D.oDOeee.o. ,'IY' C9I � os T �'A A< � J 9I4 e9 1 R ' .i 1• i� 1 1J1J! 777; HISTORIC LANDMARKS IWR TH AREAS TO BE PRESERVED CITY OF ITEJ1- (.(1 -p e�J / RANCHO CUCAXIONGA T! r I.E: PLANNING DR'ISION EX111MT SCaLE- /" 0.00V ... 040911 Mods w. .e• e• 911 • a �eBm .v.e ' W[ .VUD® 1 a*do.[..JD.•f• 1 ss9. .eo•NOJo i7..Y 11.0 e. • i O s eu. L..00..001 ...DU.a.oDa i o •Y• El A ® Y• e. A{� Y4 O• OYw �.n e.�0J er .CIP�� w00 F-7 • 1 1 p4qp L w � s�. •e=:::iai J C-•e.e � 4AOO••o• H [ .e .a� • ••4 ea so aC ..00. u.O . vo9 Dv. O: v4D .e00 9ss D00000. D.oDOeee.o. ,'IY' C9I � os T �'A A< � J 9I4 e9 1 R ' .i 1• i� 1 1J1J! 777; HISTORIC LANDMARKS IWR TH AREAS TO BE PRESERVED CITY OF ITEJ1- (.(1 -p e�J / RANCHO CUCAXIONGA T! r I.E: PLANNING DR'ISION EX111MT SCaLE- /" E 0 E CITY OF RANCHO OXA`10.:Ga INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Enviroz*nental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects reauiring environmental revie:c, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review ConL-nittee through the departr..ent Vnere the project application is mad Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Studv. The Development Review Committee will meet and teke action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard_ Tae Cor-znittee will znalce one of three deter-ninations; 1) The project will have no significant environmental L=act and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: tlircT -4 is Dare Business Center APPLICAST -S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Christeson Investment Co., 17922 Fitch Avenue, Irvine, California 92714 714 -540 -2851 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Don or Jon Christe -on - same address as above LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Northwest coiner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga CA LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Zone change . Z -j PROJECT DESCRIPTION L•J DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: see attached ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA A7D SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Approximately 13.1 acres; approximately 528,000 s.f.; proposed buildings anticipated square footage - 170,000 s.f. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRON_IIENTAL SETTING OF TEM PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INr-ORi•I'MON ON TOPOGEAPT?Y, PLA21S (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SUR=OUXNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTI`G STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): A flat piece of land with six buildings now in various stages of deterioration, all of which have lost their roofs, wa.n ows, within. was once a productive vineyard; now in a general state o mil, e- sipe owner ny general Telephone Co. consisting of an area 150 by 312 s.f.; tnxs site as bui.Lt buildina.• On the east border of the property, fronting on Haven, are a series of Eucalyptus trees row planted as an 60 to 70 feet in height. The existing remains of the six buildings mentioned a owe were once used _ma.king table and sacramental wine and was known as the Virgini Dare 'Winery. It was constructed in as was esagnea y Arthur Benton, who also was the architect for the famous Mission Inn in Riverside I Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? The project is planned to be built in either two or three eteG___ but h,,;lt from a master plan as rerein _Presented. Initially, at is planned to begin with several restaurants aid banking or financial institutions; ultimately leading to development of office buildings with some unique retailing involved. ® DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 7�f The property is described as being approximately 13.1 acres in size; the front in an irregular shape bounded on the west by Deer Creek channel with approximately 935.36 s.f. fronting on Foothill Boulevard to the south and 900 s.f. on Haven Avenue fronting to the east and having approximately a 584 foot co=lon border with a vacant vineyard property to the north. The topography of the .land is flat and consists of a grouping of buildings once known as the Virginia Dare Winery and more fully described as six cement and earth farm buildings of one to three stories. The buildings are in delapidated condition due to the closing of the business in the early 1950's caused by economic conditions and a fire. 16 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO _x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 11 x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)'. (No more than would be created by any commercial activity.) x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? flow many? app x- _ x 6. Create the need for use or disaosal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, £lammables or explosives? Ex ?lanatior_ of any YES answers above: 3. There is to be an increase in services because the land is being conv rted fr � non-use to a commercial use. 5. Trees will be removed to crAate a window to the project and to allow for angress an m A are also in the way of street and �iaAwn:k i -,rnup- gents_ Several calm trees'planted in the ear 1930's will be retained in front of the original virginia tower. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief_ I further ur.3erstand that additional information nav be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date 2 -3 Signature Aft Title RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING /DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83 -07 FOR 13.1 LOCATED ZONE (CNORTHWEST PENDING) HW T CORNER OF FOOTHILL AND HAVEN IN WHEREAS, on the 7th day of April, 1983, a complete application was filed by Christeson Investment Co. for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of June, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can /cannot be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: chat this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on June 8, 1983. SECTION 3• That Conditional Use Permit No. 83 -07 is approved subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1_ This project includes structures designated as historic landmarks. Approval of the change of use, construction, demolition, relocation, or material change pursuant to Ordinance 709 Historic Preservation, shall be obtained prior to issuance of any building or demolition permit. 2. No demolition permit shall be issued for structures designated a historic landmarks, unless a builta,ng permit is concurrently issued. Resolution No. Page 2 3. That this approval is conceptual approval only and does not constitute approval of any specific designs. Specific site plan and elevation shall be required for each phase of the project. 4. A consistent architectural theme, incorporating the mission style architecture associated with the historic Garrett Winery shall be utilized throughout the entire project. 5. All project entrances on Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue shall be designed with a special textured treatment, such as stamped concrete. In addition, a textured treatment shall be used in the pedestrian walkway underneath the arbor that runs through the site. 6. The use of Deer Creek Channel right -of -way shall not interfere with or obstruct the use of said right -of -way for regional trail purposes. Written approval from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for the use of Deer Creek Charnel right -of -way for parking and landscaping shall be submitted prior to issuance of grading or building permits. Failure to receive approval will require submittal of a revised site plan. %. The arbors shall be planted with vines, and creeping varieties of vines or ivy shall be utilized against wall surfaces throughout the project reminiscent of the original winery. 8. A parcel map or lot merger shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 9. Additional landscape planter fingers shall be provided throughout the parking areas, approximately every seven stalls, to provide a tree canopy for shade. 10. The Site Plan shall be revised to indicate a maximum one (11) foot car overhang into planter areas, which would result in a curb -to -curb dimension of 62 feet on a double - loaded two -way aisle. 11. The one -way access road located at the southeast corner of the project shall be screened with a combination of berming and landscaping. A vine covered arbor may be required if this functions as a bank drive -thru facility. F.-.71 L- :J Resolution No. Page 3 12. Revised Site Plan shall be submitted -indicating retention of the full 30 -fort Regional Trail and a minimum 5 feet of landscaping between the Channel and the parking areas prior to issuance of grading or building permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Herman Rempel, Cha�rm:an ATTEST: Secretary of the P anning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission Resolut onCity of R nand ® Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of June, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: C Cl i u El I. mob ,v 6^ 1� N y b C r p q j O 39gS r� ON 6 � c� �a n rn q Nqw W y O r v ^> n S � 9 9 q N no > q q n> arm q � T O w 6 d S TJ r >•d r q n T q ^ ryN 6 J AGM k n n w+ -�N T N3 ^O Q <b w + 6 J r 4 i p j J N LLN�O O J9 > w r O r > + O O T r < O 6 ^ o "�v q +yd N91 n d 00 �� 9 Ni° > d N ^ T O G +7 > 39 N SqO� q � O w J l ii O G m �o • q m J L q IM d 6 O L• r N a T O q < d N° ° L N J o, 9 r _ 6 O W n 1 r ° O C N S C L j ^C 3m q w w i T6 q n � N .c r q 1 f>i ado N p9 _ 1 d � O O � r C d ♦t r q � 7 q A O' r q � n J � b r O O t 6 O J b 7 O ° G > J q � O 1 6 � N q nvb O � � O > 6 6 N + S w q n J 6 . N a v ' � 3 q q y l d J lg1N +� > 2 n > M T O S 2 > w O �qd N` r �r S NL� OO C J 6 q Sc� N N _ �3c d J .T N q ,r vd >q 9�f O d° 1Y r9 q O ° O C 6 Sd w N cn q O J q C J l .P<bc r q S G N 7 � O � O N ry 9 r O LLNY C � Y w�0 r n °70 1N q O 9 <o >i F q � 0 S w O O � nw 6 w T O > oN+ O q b = S d +O �N�091 n fig i n + A > 1 q u. O S J 6 q > S N b d S n q 3 q > +n T9 = d N q c > J O N N T n oc 1D 3 6 q � S l q 6 n O � 6 q sir S F O q Z-1 ° D n< q r n O O S Y O y c Z C N z . P r. m O Y L� a ("f O O m A C K J m O ti p W N O O� CST CK�� j9N= pT�goa q= 10w 6w!- JY d�N d 9Aq qD Eli i�0�°n +d.Cd 10' NSA Nb nr0 uO.LL 9Z3 >J Q�j �' J6q rn r DCN N O' 6 6 • O^ ° T° � •J O� 1 A O ' �° Q w d rr� >onw° ^o� dnN3 Jq 2 w o_ �.>. �0 9y.a� N �� � w2r �°.. J p=m .>•.i° _Nv > N 6 d N j y a p 6> d j l> •� w n S q� b = N 6 - >� p r r < 6 �O O n ^+ r 6 i r J n • n d q N S r 19- > r O+ O O q u L 6 i 6 N pO rT 1 O' r+ N> p1 N 1pi n^ °06 ^n Sd 9C y39 dd ON N nN3d_ °dr w�Or n?n ��nr q< AC. C130 r nrON zt rN =° 9WR > d_nN 1aq q J T d 3 >° > �• �•C < N> w 6 n O d P P° w i q� n 3 L wj l q b'N l M b S r r r• pJ r C`C ♦C> A M � ^� rs `Jy T l 6 �•C S� „N O � TC rw1 �1 Z = Z °n >� g6Sta rK. d 9Td °S w d 6nC �� ° O� °° > NAP O n y T r 1 R w u r� O. L+ �l •• i7 r q �d S AOZSOJ` > -�F S w- I90 b� d•r N 10, l D 6 au Da O N T 6 s ap dcu+ A O L 9 i A C N q o c ^ d a C Pr OJ N� pS] L •J F ` P r D ry d: N d L J ' p 9 L O q L C l p q d `. a T 0 °✓ N 'a9Jy ^ TAq�ir a Cr +L NNA O1�� L ✓ 9 N •'. ' r L � r O P 9 g O O N P r p y � pA W N 06Z C J C] W N 9 O T� r ri`Y N .a oca ✓ am urn A 9 p�uY ^ P✓ . L L � .°.mw9o. .T. c...._ °t ate= cN•ca v� n c y r d 1�, ✓�d. nom.`. a„'o ^aa ✓.. = adq O L+ r � L .N.i 9 n "�'c A`° O > A N N d .i. L N � j A^ V 9✓ ` p V O N� � ��✓ Op L ++ ✓�JOA �✓ .L q aL _ `od.L. a °`� N o ^ «t.ua�o�n _qo c j pC a ✓9 AU .°+ EV .r 9 9 dL> ° F4C Ac ° ^Nr «aoua vs ice•°' 9 4c✓c L ` A iapA �'oG ✓L,; y y C 6 bA �N c' q` � d 9 d 9 Y E Z y� N Y +• b rn O d V n?° ✓ V D O y r 6 L^ C C ✓� 4 d Y s N> Y✓ N C G ✓ O N O A ✓ L M D d J 6 d L V p q -°- A O. rJ V O A N E C h .✓ r� r 4 A � � i r ✓ L am` � � �� g l C L M Z j t C' J a T✓EE a ` C L J V F6 N C C d ✓� A✓ 6 N Pq C N C F ` O� C N G °cru J.a ^ ✓.N.S�D � — LEA ry d E 0 NA �✓ +E 6 7 L A A ca. L U ° A j y •r l] N A` y V 9 C C a 2] 6. d •i.• O L 6 O✓ d r °c >OE dgA9 a00 A .� L.d., •aA Ey d i9 LL ✓ L✓ d D 0 p q p r A q 6 c V U L 9Nd 3.a. ` pO�u ✓A✓ +O N N� L°• r n Z .`,. A a '- C Q� r^ O C V Z V1 L V .O A° c .' N v d a �.` .°i E L •• J+ o o: c L i a y N a i d ¢ n t_OFE6 ILA y Nyu Q^ �� _a ✓�9 Ni °V rO g N J° 6 v C yc L A V 90�Vr C A C r a 9 J A O d 6 L q 9 y g r C A y A L✓ _.O Y p C n d✓ C L 1 ^N L6 EC O ✓ 9q r O N N NL u.�i m9 F6 °so��.n 4 � ✓^ NEN A V ^r V gOrCd Or N rn3 `�OCy _ uP �^ -« °"'Y °t.`cA s ��`�.. ✓ °mc ` w ,°e _ ^n vaN RAJ' qq O 6✓ V N d Y .N•.� y ✓moo � A d _>�a°i ^NC L - c c v Z >= P p c d A °_V >d.rO 6 °V O °dy ! 401 ^ O C.2 9n V O 9 � 4 C C ^ N E C + N+ D O V C ° a V U✓ F4 ✓^ + 0 � n `� C d ✓A + C .•] C q J� O �' •"- P A L r N > O dE nPOi J 6aNS C`W A �3 V•aV`• C 6 L d_C�d 9 n L r V O n y y L✓ � y L 9 L` •Li• C N✓ f r N� r v D L ° _ F_ r d° A C L _ L aI .d• U N L Ii +V p93J. AZ^ r Y 6CN 6 +.. Q t9 l A d u �� V C S A J O L rL. � r y C O J� L •O V E e i.C.07 rV Y y > l9d V N� -TN+ N 9 pA rOd Jr6 ' _ \ ol �M .T. •^ v <o 3 o ° au Da O N T 6 s ap dcu+ A O L 9 i A C N q o c ^ d a C Pr OJ N� pS] L •J F ` P r D ry d: N d L J ' p 9 L O q L C l p q d `. a T 0 °✓ N 'a9Jy ^ TAq�ir a Cr +L NNA O1�� L ✓ 9 N •'. ' r L � r O P 9 g O O N P r p y � pA W N 06Z C J C] W N 9 O T� r ✓ 9 d✓ •r N L °^ A 9 O b Y ^ P✓ . L L � - b q P✓ a N O O y C d A ✓✓ A ^.C+ a r C O L+ r � L A`° O > A N N d N L N � j A^ V 9✓ ` p V O N� � ��✓ Op L ++ A90�1 i aA` 6 `od.L. a °`� N o ^ «t.ua�o�n _qo c j .°+ ° Ac crc° 9 4c✓c L ` < �'oG ✓L,; °"'_s`Oi 9A Eri. y C 6 Q � 4 q` � d 9 ^ N •g• 4 L V V c E Z y� N Y +• b A � d T N y r 6 ` c d V L C C ✓� 4 d Y s N> N O N O A ✓ L M D d J 6 d L V p q -°- A O. rJ V O A ✓ ..0. 4 j A ` d ° V r T O a � � �� g l C L M Nt q � O Y-= ✓L 6 N Pq C A J L C..5 O LEA ry d E 0 �.° -Vy� 4 U ° n N C °J y V .L•• •9- °L O z Nc.. a 2] 6. d •i.• O L 9c do c °c r' A .� L.d., c •� ° J � E Z 9• N Y• N.L. a� V N E P N N� L°• � Z q.r p C Q� r^ O C V Z V1 L V N y N C ✓V?L ✓�9 Ni °V rO J° 6 .- C yc L A V 90�Vr C A LAA d V ✓3A 9 y g r C V Y r• C dV✓+ L yr 9a,N ^N L6 EC O ✓ 9q r O N NL u.�i ✓ d 6Z 4 � ✓^ NEN A V ^r V gOrCd Or N rn3 `�OCy C �c Cq wN• A JN V�EA'° O.tgV ✓ EOJ > ^NC - c c v Z >= P p c d d O C L ! 401 ^ O 0= r 4 r `N- C ^ a O O` L C u V J✓ 9 d. q . t C 6 L ° C O O n y y O J � y L L •Li• C � O D L ° V O L O d u �� C C 4 O u C S A J O L rL. � r y C O J� L •O V E e i.C.07 rV Y y > l9d V N� -TN+ N 9 pA rOd Jr6 _ \ ol �M .T. •^ v <o ob" ar «` No'c.`° o ° ° N cA -'c.°i br y9 .o •o u °a Lq ✓� a°si =c D1J Yv.T.P o Nuq -y dN4 4 $� ✓I ``o° = r Ov ✓N NY �� +rc Qac ✓ < ✓gr44 6` Tom° n V /J � A L C J•O T64AV Pl✓1= 9 6�V� C n ^rq � L Cam✓ CAL9 l Ja• t C�NOT V ✓L-•+ E v r � O •r _ NV =V ..C. 9 NN�w✓ ° � •7n C E O -9 i •Ji C1 OC O +Gq O t+ X00 l LN NC�gON �Qr6V N+ N 6� ^�� LC rN OC 6E ✓d LpOL 0.6 6 +3 1a L ✓+ V 2 0 O c.. O :5 N V O 9 N r n j C O� V� O ��L L CC q > q C q° �6 6. T r O Y - •GLO.o T ca N N P °N a Y�L OC G p y Q P O NL pN Nso'G q C � T y A O y C CQ C C O P y C N O O ^ r q C qy O O a Y q W M E O a. a r 0 C p Y A b.° C w z 9 � L L d T l ` 0 c . noN P ; E N_Gc � PO O C C cc9 C Q G 6 C �e w O G L NN V ^a N O C 6 P N N J O C t g' o JY O L O u0 d9 Lc O V Y r p 9 w =` J d C 6 Y N C A O d 6 g O p > A i O O 6 q 6 O _ �•jy. a V Tv G J A 904 `Na_O yN p L ^VLNV TC`IOCL � O« r6 `'_ ^y w yL_ �i�9 O.. L- �y0•QOC Od °dN d PG �y >9� aV L TNT Lp r_A'O GW� r LLOL P y9i =^ A �y Ste• ip ^gwHTr • aAT v 2 g W p 9 •� O C q V� a N N. u T9 N C y r N� � � 9 Y d N cqN 9 � WOYPAO L'Ti ON CO On VJO C >9 � q i JuV• Cq ` q .Pl ra Ty^ 9 O l O'PN C V ��j WC ^ •...n �.�q q Ly✓ y9 OL 6d� v^ Y d L�AI OVA T ✓� O �Y°.Oa NC90.^ �q AV �`C NG O' Y_•O A L M Pq0W ^ W v9 Cd9 .d =y qq Lq 9v` y L ��' Ly NCB L dCy00q Cy QrY EN ay^ `• ^ T �9 O G y W J W'qq jO >.� p�A O Nq 0' ^_66 rCAyW nd _•W L�a JNA OYA WO LdC Lna 1[ ,Oy(n q�0 9>�J9 F yd yVp AO.N C W qV PO.J .^ ' N da 9s n ^° M d _°.'�' m• n Ty rO 1 ^E P�OO88 6u JVP C� CAG C�V ^`W ^' l O'^L N N 6N� QL 6N TN dd 6A�'00. 6 �aY NL N Z 1 C7 C _ u C N T •e = q9 �.L..9 N Q.•q .O C V L Y' C U y' FCF q rr a, J N LL t:5 W 9 � 'O Ej-N- 0.L OpEPO V LA °� �a0 L�4 d P �L O E�n� ✓, �' d p J r 6 r L d C L OuQ �•-O iO dO � O T r• P qy cc a ° A' V° N A9 ON 6d Tl `NEO N Y d u t J q r C P N C Zvo Nw` q Lm La V�V L .OeTCai- W` rO^ A� q Ypr E' rJ qL N_ 9N �.Li.t° dT T C VV p�NO C 'y PL O O N GTQ y L C D ^ 9 gyp+ d6 ^TOd L d G v d r° A � <6Y 6 W VEiLL uEi�� E Z y W C - L' O� _ �•jy. a V Tv G J A 904 `Na_O yN p L ^VLNV TC`IOCL � O« r6 `'_ ^y w yL_ �i�9 O.. L- �y0•QOC Od °dN d PG �y >9� aV L TNT Lp r_A'O GW� r LLOL P y9i =^ A �y Ste• ip ^gwHTr • aAT v 2 g W p 9 •� O C q V� a N N. u T9 N C y r N� � � 9 Y d N cqN 9 � WOYPAO L'Ti ON CO On VJO C >9 � q i JuV• Cq ` q .Pl ra Ty^ 9 O l O'PN C V ��j WC ^ •...n �.�q q Ly✓ y9 OL 6d� v^ Y d L�AI OVA T ✓� O �Y°.Oa NC90.^ �q AV �`C NG O' Y_•O A L M Pq0W ^ W v9 Cd9 .d =y qq Lq 9v` y L ��' Ly NCB L dCy00q Cy QrY EN ay^ `• ^ T �9 O G y W J W'qq jO >.� p�A O Nq 0' ^_66 rCAyW nd _•W L�a JNA OYA WO LdC Lna 1[ ,Oy(n q�0 9>�J9 F yd yVp AO.N C W qV PO.J .^ ' N da 9s n ^° M d _°.'�' m• n Ty rO 1 ^E P�OO88 6u JVP C� CAG C�V ^`W ^' l O'^L N N 6N� QL 6N TN dd 6A�'00. 6 �aY NL N Z 1 C7 N e4 Qd� os�as 7? st L= q � a a, L �� ✓;;e �� �V� C? tiuc .^ v c- a q L � o vai c L ° b °� r a m p �O ✓ E P9 E✓ i 9 q ✓ a .O O J_ � a U d L ✓ a �j G N ,r_, � L > 0 0 � °c •" ocu a =c v.'.n ^� EO^ uas °O�d °o '° ✓ c � � �� �- r r r �✓ 9 N 'r a �✓ g � G O L` � C 'oD _. � d✓ Div 4 ac „-G .°. O d j0 a 00. qm �=9q L'LSt C.c ✓ ✓Nq �� qO L rrO P aUP =O 06O aq✓ .°. aq ._ qN Y O a— y o q N✓ ° y= y A o b b y t ✓�_ E e TN G 6✓ •-• Cq q `yu iLGq 6Y.0 DLO mE c .rbJ °4 �; ANON poi. ✓i ± °'� C ^✓ a y Oy ^A ^9 O O^ Nta L °• °6 G. K.RP�L� aT .L NOS 0 n d' COwr Ems!•.. T aN�V 9L i c r e a A A G L S c o you ✓ c — y y r °i c NI a •.. 9' P,n'^' Vv °.N✓ N PLV v°i .^O VI .J V rrOr aM O.0 qr r OAN aaL qyW a2 ?�9i YLOSL�c C �C Pi �� ✓ c a ar � aq �°� "a > P Gy q'V LCP E ✓ice tCd= a✓a PN P�C� ^ •""Cq °� Ny q �P P✓ a_ V Oydq 6q ^� , N dd �'JJq rL Oy�dL. 'L 7 qT 6✓ < P V G V W O Q A L V 9 a �I C�I O C W J ✓^ V G pS p Pte• X 0 9 L d L � a P C U L P C a C d _ C L ✓ Y q ✓` L O a r f✓ N d'aa E •qca � Tb� �o L ° oo °c ° P �. � o d.u.." ✓�_ `a— � ✓oa.P F — � me r o ..a^ ° L 2 V ✓ d l✓ V ° � a P V S V a £ A a A 9 L F C _ pp 6O '�� L LK q` SL d0 ✓� L� O U .°r E q� L] i✓ A ✓ g r Y a m o a_ gN G O y q L q c —a N cw.` Ems° m� bo M� as qN 9 v U^ G � N N✓ E � a Y P � ` Q �� ^ = A •� P N P r G q O E K^ N a O E y O A S q C- a Op � O c`° Od �Oa� aA�^S � b_ LV qC dCr °MCP O _ � L � ✓ 6• V W J ^ ✓ L L a _ •� � Ga N Q .^ U q a -° r ✓ L O d O L d r J ✓ ^ d a ..) V 9 u y a✓ p 6 �r > C a .L.. P N l ✓ P y Qc: = :� cpq .. ✓� °cam �q = —c � °L �a uw n��GO �'q`• °naJ^ �'�•TO LK. as �N aY .°.�` ri+`u � o.q.. °e � �`�° M.. ca =e eu N si°, —_ Y ° °✓ ✓�� a N i—. y V N •^ E C'f �_ � V` N C LL i j N C am- r V c— � e O O b - q�NCO 1. 'L U✓ r' 'v ✓ V E q ✓ 'J� •J - a P- -!1 P C - i a m L G L � `9 q o N- _ N rl - i O ✓� V N O u✓ y O d O Z I �•' U. 9 a �. ✓ y L � 9 C� V V i 7I O d- - C C - Z 7 ^J C q- q 2 l tr N L N 1 O ✓ L' O GL W N 6- O O N G V .'l. O W V V -J O• V' r O• S a Nj 7 11 2 0 G D 6 C � _ NpY P q S 1 ! I rC� d� '�= NOi C r ✓rVV I I I J A L ', J. •r u L W C N 6' O N N J pNr dJ ' � w0 ' j O•..r .^ • CO I I c Ya T C-JL ,- 9- L9VC� V9 W r_ I I � O G p ^�� w y a w' •r• = C O A L � ^ r• pr {Ey OgpPN CN � V � I 9~ O ! g A V J PTO O y T r L Q L O ! •Ti '•' I I w •°^ -�'�� -°•r °N o_"oi '"p �'•' SAD t ° N.o. O —yrK 9LLa _pU OTC! ��n0✓ � S_ 1 C 9 •� I I O CV � mW 0'9^ '7 A•NU2 NM L LNr y` p dw u Ti A w O c E � �� � I I q X v� ^• V d C` p C�� Y L T d y r G V Q D d y r t =� y V 0 • ^ i 9 .0 G p �� '"� � I �— C u O Tt r p � _T` w y u � a � A i• O' d ✓ C r A a_ O •Jq ^V I 1 = Ap` E1]•n0^ N___ O Nv w V�qC r y.Di• � W �� I �� I 1 A J V T •J L d d V^ 9 L _P .yy+ � = V N w m r w D W ` a ti y T •T• ^� D W E � r a 0 9 W Y N V G' — C G 7 u• r '7.3 I q 6 N V y A C N N O � O� O Q V 6^ W r •�• L t V S 6 V 9 1 JY N Q N 9 V O 9 N O q � d w t L 9 a N N a � A- ' O q C O N 0 c q — M � AK V 9�pV C � V T C D N E v V C�> A O N C p V � O Li 6 V O N_ �'•^ E G C v y N � q 6 O P 1 dA � V � y A c' p —� � V •n i � V - L V - a V 0 d • 0 •9. •L.. N W u co D D C 2 � i ^ O P O O O d L d a a 9 -.• Pp w wp 9 Q U U O T Vrin Ln a �It V v J OLj O C C ` ` 6 6 I = J — I I I I ti• ` .T L I S d a N N a N O C C Q V w O� L V T � I o`er � Loco 6A N 9 V O 9 N O q � d w t L 9 a N N a � A- ' O q C O N 0 c q — M � AK V 9�pV C � V T C D N E v V C�> A O N C p V � O Li 6 V O N_ �'•^ E G C v y N � q 6 O P 1 dA � V � y A c' p —� � V •n i � V - L V - V 0 d • 0 •9. •L.. W co D D N�u• r rW • 9 ��D P 9 Pp w wp 9 •Nnod � �_ L Ln a ai OLj O C C ` ` 6 6 S d a N N a N O C C Q V A T O V V V p G T V 2 2 .a - -•, p P d w O LTL N O >•y L L� N✓ r 4 r N N� U U r U 4 r U O — A A N L q q d d d N N N — C — y 9 — w y N •On a V L r O E c M D °pace P q 9� Vy V N O 2�RE C L « �'^co r• ) C T A O G a P ?<� y y o dm �1 N PNDm V ^lN' a d O c A• 9 J oN sa d V w L - T ri• v ^ r •u e « N A ^ E J Z TA E tcy •r T E y C V � 2 O C V 2 oa r - � N 9 N d ..r 0 79 E iJ• c E ^ O ^ Q L V �• 4I� L,7 I a O ^ 1 C c I ^q CY q Opp y c •' � a o O C « C V C O•'• L T C J a W « y _ C O •• 'C O V O LL C C I C ��l L � O O y V F O Z U F ^ I n Pi _ N T T O� C q Lr 9 q N I "• L n q J� ^ L O N C r •� •V+ M r _ y n O~ L V V O C rO V y C�u E Nr aic� >i y� cin L Y +Pa V. COQ Y� a 9yo CI _ 6q yyt« s L9 N�.p. Qu u pa 00 c nL aly "c °mac � P L T C^ C O = I � ^ •� V N V� •J C q F L i � L V W v V OWN Q^ N P LL n 6 n nJUL C N /I VI 6 1 O •• EJ I C ��l L � O O y V F O Z U F ^ I n Pi _ N T T O� C q Lr 9 q N I J� •L.• N r •� •V+ M _ q« a � P L T C^ C O = I � ^ •� V N V� •J C q F L i � L V W v V « Y N E N r O 2 O q I O 6 M O C ^ 1 i• O V pn i �_ V 9_ Or V � 9 6� OrTi y 1` q asi•` ` L N J • Nc s a 9r NC OLV N. i- a I TCO T E IR C .^N LE V C g C O I O T LP C M qi •L+ qL L L 'eC y2:!E �V L u,•• ° ��n P<� n`T� cY� is I �° .Neo L°,.� P.C. em L.1. O•.T OCO i 1 O W n`:f �VV •V•V`l «.J. ` I I p vd Y.^ J= ]••� �r �= �I q L n t V f Tq V w• V I � V L r LLI q V d C G •J O j V l r V I L 1� V ]� i V ^ � � a. ^�•L.• <wJY iNY I I I QI �V 6dN I^ '.� 1 1 6 r n T <^ C] J I •'I j1 \ 1 2 L] 40 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 8, 1983 TO: INembers of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner By_ Frank. J. Dreckmam, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12414 - ALMAR - A tots l dew,e'l op11.2nt ;;n subdivision of c. acres ink lots comprising 92 detached single family units in the R -2 zone, generally located south of Mignonette Street, between Beryl and Opal Streets - APN 292- 032 -71. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map for the above - described project. B. Purpose: To create 92 single family units C. Location: Generally located south of Mignonette Street, between Beryl and Opal Streets D. Parcel Size- 12.3 acres E. Existing_ Z_ R-2 F. Existinq Land Use: Citrus Grove G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning le family residential;' zoned North - Vacant parce s 9 A -1 South - Egg Ranch; zoned A -1 East - Single Family Residential; zoned A -1 West - Single Family Residential; zoned A -1 H. General Plan Desi nations: roject ite - Low Me ium Residen• North - Low Medium Residential, South - Low Medium Residential, East - Low Medium: Residential, West - Low Mediums Residential, .ial, 4 -8 d 9 /ac 4 -8 du /ac 4 -8 du /ac 4 -8 du /ac 4 -8 du /ac ITEM G Planning Commission Agenda June 8, 1983 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The site consists of a lemon grove which genera y s open in a northwest /southeast direction at approxi- mately three percent grade. In addition to the citrus grove, the site contains eucalyptus, maple, magnolia, and walnut trees (Exhibit "D "). No structures are located on the parcel and no street improvements exist along Beryl and Mignonette Streets. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed development will consist of 92 single fan — detached units and one common area lot on 12.3 acres of land in the R -2 zone (Exhibit "A"). Project density is 7.48 dwelling units per acre which is within the designated Low- Medium (4 -8 du /ac) General Plan density range. All setbacks, building separations, and open space requirements of the Zoning Ordinance have oeen complied with. The project proposes a variety of om and two story units with various elevation treatments. In addition, a common area has been provided which contains a pool, tot lot, and passive recreation areas. The common area is the main unifying element of the protect and access will be provided to all residents. Additionally, a passive open space entrance statement has been provided at the easterly loop at Mignonette Street. As illustrated on the site plan, Exhibit "A ", the project consists of interior private streets which meander, and encircle the common area. The meandering streets, coupled with the staggered building setbacks, provide visual interest and var'••zty. In addition, two points of access to the project have been provided via mignonette Street. Lastly, a future coimection to Opal Street will provide additional access to the project. B. Design Review Committee: Design Review Committee comments repo wed aroun a elevation and roof treatments; (b) perimeter treatments and entrance statements; and, (c) providing adequate visual buffers and screening. Various conditions of approval are listed on the attached Resolution which fully addresses and mitigates these design issues. C. Development Review Committee: The Development Review Committee was primarily concerned with providing flood control measures which include curb, gutter, etc., along Beryl Street, from the prcposed "bubbler structure" (Exhibit "K") to the existing catch basin located south of the project. The storm drain system shall he designed for a 100 -year flood. in addition, the Commit' ecomended reducing the easterly cul -de -sac to a diameter _ -feet in order to provide for an enlarged 1] C� :J �J Tentative Tract 12414JAlmar Planning Commission Agenda June 8, 1983 Page 3 landscaped strip adjacent to Beryl Street. Committee required full street improvements and Mignonette Streets which included curb, pavement, street lights, etc. Additionally, the contiguous to Beryl gutter, sidewalks, D. Growth Management Committee: The project has been reviewed by The Growth Management Committee and has been assessed a total of 70.08 points under the Residential Assessment System, thus exceeding the threshold limit, and can be considered by the Planning Commission for approval. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the app icant. Staff completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the project. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on the attached Resolution are s5-pported by t e following facts: o The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the development and the proposed single family uses are in accordance with the objectives of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. o The proposed site plan, in conjunction with the Conditions of Approval, is consistent with the current development standards of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing item in The Daily Report newspaper and notices were sent to property owners within feet of the subject property. V. RECDNMENDATION: it is recommended thz conduct a pub is hearing and receive matter. If after such consideration the facts for findings and conditions of attached Resolution and issuance of recommended. t the Planning Commission all public input on this Commission can support the approval, adoption of the s Negative Declaration is Tentative Tract 12414 /Almar Planning Commission Agenda June 8, 1983 Page 4 Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit "An nBn NCR _ n�a _ DER — nF —Jn nKn - Site Plan Location Map Landscape Plan Natural Features Garage Layout - Elevations Bubbler Structure 11 E 0 133y15 - 'tAN3H - Lj t s J' - III�L u a I � 1 2 Q a�Q � N W r r 0 W > J Q r W •- 0 lir 5 I+ chi � I , _ li�l I g :: ^, •'I;.:. . i 9 9 �i+ i i � j •�� !�� tl--- .e -1.1� i� C J� ..•i 1 . E�qli I 1 � .� r. .y�'/ a ' • a VJ � � r � � •E / p CITY OF ITEM: � t RANCHO CUCANN - it PLANNING DR'ISION EX! HIM SCALE - ---- - - -- - . - - - FORTH CITY Or' ITEM 1: RANCHO CUCAINIO1GA TITLE= Q(a dab rr �TNiNc Dtvrstav EXHIM T. 5 SCALE :_ taaals _ _ ��a3a I ^. -{1 y a ij �}y5 B I-J as F tT 'ice I I' ---t- W L d]_ I IIf ✓ i 1 I _ iL ta +W- ' v H � as T ~ulll 111111 4 p Hip 1 ♦ _ i _ cos �> '`°i ,�.ti � •r .. �4 CITY or PLANNING DIVESIO\ II ! oti?s WORTH �TIIY Q��3_ ITEM: 1 rA E.ti iiBtT- G SGL.E- CITE' OF RANCHO CUCN 'N,10NGA PLANNING DIVISION ITEA I: ! TITLE: L %I 11 >IT: SGXLE: .® E NORTH E F • o O F li z a O w � e LL _ J 4 � d � N J - ✓ V NORTH CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCANT IO GTA TITLE: jz;4j!. Gaya �aT u� PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT. � SCALE _ w - • FLOO Fl ?LAN z a O w � e LL _ J 4 � d � N J - ✓ V NORTH CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCANT IO GTA TITLE: jz;4j!. Gaya �aT u� PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT. � SCALE CITY Or. RA \CI -i() CM PLANNING Di JNON Z a f > a 0 r z a d z 0 F e 0 0 0 n A r v J �a 0 tl Z C . m I 0 J •I 1'TE:.\ t: - EXI IIBIT= F - SCALE' 0 �t 0 J •I 1'TE:.\ t: - EXI IIBIT= F - SCALE' 0 E z 0 t J 1 0 r z a Y 4 2 0 } 0 u J 9 r a CITY O RANCHO CUQA PLANNING DIVISION k c . ITEM: z 0 F 7 a a Y 2 } < i a a I a i ' O i t z `11 8 ` Y E \1 imm - scALE- V NORTH otn5 a Z CITY Or R ;' -A PLANNING JIN TION z 0 v n r i a z it V J -r ITF_1I - TMF- E- XJiJBrr: _SCALE. z c T u 1 _ a O Y 11 L.1 El M 1Ti Z 0 fi z O t Z a C 6� Q a CIF' CF L- It A RAN CTU CUC-L. PL.A\Ni \G DIVISKYN V o J J J _ 7 0 -Z . o u u r a Y ITEM 1- Z 0 F 7 a a a c r 6 EA EMIIPIT- �V SCALE- G� IO(: i H �Z l t. I.- Z < eL 43 ' u N as 1 2 6 7 U Z O C IL CITY OF RAI CI4O CLU F'L:11 \DTI \G I?I�'LSIO�I ell a Z O F < 7 U u ti E U Y Z O N u u U D N i a Eq ITI:M: TI_r-_: _Gobc Pla c I xlilw: A _ SCALE- I] V NORTH i �L i i NORTH CIT N' OF ITE.NI- ® RA -NCHO CL.0 VNIONGA TITLE: 21-, fe_ `VVG -�t�rP PLMNNING DIVISION EXHIMT. - SO LD Z �L i i NORTH CIT N' OF ITE.NI- ® RA -NCHO CL.0 VNIONGA TITLE: 21-, fe_ `VVG -�t�rP PLMNNING DIVISION EXHIMT. - SO LD El P� 9P -Y V�� OO O ✓C O4 q v¢Nw gOC e nm _� -odL Ld G 3 VYO je a d q q d✓ L q L_ pO �° O C q W '- r F T� T.a c q �� �aCq Y C N� O 9 ✓p y 66 > Elded '`y =q Y N 6✓ L O Op d L O N u r_ C^ 6 6 N N y� a 9� C a g r U `° Y L i •C d ✓ � G P N � � N '� N ✓ G '� H K y` Y E qW O� Vduq L d C d N� C ^ N E 9 ^ q O L O• Jju fd�� 9 O_ 6 P OOSI VG CJO qqC 7;2— °te c^ Qd _ r0•_ _° V�qd µr GG °• ` ✓ i O m � w q c 9 w A O S pPv PY Etc _p c 2 OY e q N p\e yr 60 Cry V CQ q L - �zy T ^t q G N r q r =} r D•e O O d ✓ 1� d P � a g r Y � V Y.r.q � � N= J O C L ✓✓ ILA r6LG O V L y N V { C ✓ 0 ° L-° i o v Er yl >i `q Y 9.1. q qG q iY NL+ A eY� P Nieo ° v -n OVN a vy �• V S 1 N 9dY r.0 Ud'2q O r Q% 4 v c o W9 °J� y�crn oa � ^NN ec w m- qua ice` u nq �� t r^ N Y` q p N„ Cr L � Y' N q q e q d q V N C p T C^ y i N C✓ 2 C yEJ O: 0 0 G O d V V' Y ^ V O- d L m C O N ' ✓ O✓ Y Oir ✓IY �' j .5;:5 cc ^ O N ^ d V CFrY O S1TG^ er-.+^ O 6� eOV � °d Sn V wT O MV Po YL Oe I�.qN YocY Lq Tm p yyaa "E (�E✓ CVV Ohm qd PP Oy9C �O. �dq Va> L8q' Oq P^VY > ^C YCp EC O L M6 LV Orr V �. 1!p °r�NLV_^ i >YYi y O L d .�� O d C e =q^ L ECJ ^ M ✓> V C q^ N eN L C -` P 9> i y e ^= V l Y T 6 0 9 E ^ r w Y O q w q ^ J a e d O � P — G 0� m z _c, Nee 4 V 6V� "�gOLp 6N6C x v O Y• Gy a R 4 O G O O V O N V N=i < n 3 O M r C O V i c V 2 x S 0 S� Ni O r 6 O V J 5 f` -o O r =F O 0 C> IS- °1 v tom Yom Lnq q 9 e,L m 9 O w C oe X Nd m � � m ie^ V E d V � r O•L r P hCa V = Oa'r n` 2 qr d C V r N > C d. V C � C C N rq C L O > q M 6 d� q `1 O G O E J ;4 S NvL� C C Op q E » Y Y V ^4L a�Y _ o Y I r V C V V o c �AN v =a mqn Lt^ O w V - °M q q O L_ V V q V e. M O ° Y O V O 9 P q V r «u ° e nm v -odL G 3 VYO je G.C� O�qV OY t°,. v e ace N �vm `o vuo a =N and ��v L C ^ N E 9 C q O L O• 6 P L q N 9 C Y d 6 L 7;2— °te c^ _° GG °• ` ✓ i O m � w q c 9 w A O S pPv PY Etc _p c 2 OY e q N p\e yr 60 Cry V CQ q L y�rO a >L ^E T ^t Y � V Y.r.q � � N= ��^ ✓ q g ILA r6LG O CVY �N�OV V OI i yl NI m NvL� C C Op q E » Y Y V ^4L a�Y _ o Y I r V C V V o c �AN v =a mqn Lt^ O w V - °M q q O L_ V V q V e. M O ° Y O V O 9 P q V r «u O a O 6 2ZL ,z IN d Y= V r d V �7d LL qW O d G Y V u Y 9 L dr r =O PV �V Lap rVi V -� Jdyvy V g O d O C C a�vcr nyoV v ":Y S.Y,Yi pPUv CPVq >�C -V a O q� yEO. _YaLOr dP q-'- P V Q n q y O GY N o .; c�aeyi r 3 —; 4 L d 9 ZrV, L p� V q p0 Z q Z SO Td Y V r N ^ Y ¢atv vNV� C > C �Nn Y � O .Ln O V NQ P9 O e o c E C C d < y Cr q_ r � 'c �v C e p a V O d L O py d q oq 7 � O V v u V V Y y r r G 6 4 V `b11 1 d a w C C 4 vG . w V r a L O p i „ L O o = L � G L N V c `o Vv ei v4 q O C C1�t N i t CPC d a� P9 q y y O T�Q Cl r O q 6ir =rti V q � wli O q PL C p Y V T q L C C q =� d 6� VE q pyC L y N�q 6 O r q i E i y O d M � O w m °ov d y H � N i O a V O p 6 q M gCg� 3.; O r i O o c .L.. t d Z z y o � q I v O V a O O M Y t vai i P p 5 q O V V C V q a L q � d.0 NO � � o y 9 ^ d ou °c e�tK ec o°1 O N N r � O v ter° E o N C pC9 o� .Nun r L Ora a u G C C V e V L9 V a`a r V� �N Sre o O > v d Y q P l r V F 6 w q u 0 T 1' C r O L v 0 n.: C q � L P N C C q s m � r d y O N q ti M C q L v E 7 L W r C C q d d V L E r O O Sr c c y C S O C C T� d .L. V � O ° A Y v � V q E a - N L a p C O N C m° v L u ° � NcGa 7 V_ o _ � O S = V q O p T C � C.♦ 6L p O L C V q „ O �a iv .o L 0 = P c 6qV� _ r _ O q 6 Ewa 6PV �Lt c c N O PLO^ 06�EjV 2 r L d d i(O Cc ucsoao 9 � 0 V V U d� CCV _ • CV Laq E N uigd g C V N 6 N C v^ P ov T r � a r L t :E J Pw r�r`a +e� V C y Q N O N c g r O p C u q V r V C N d L L O O S y O O ti L pO I O p N CI .o-eae cr LOo �spaiv� f� f EM�O�i�a Nr ^= r'8erctN V'�ZrV��r L q ^ L Z V r O C 4 C Z r t q O Y V O ., sru mq�co y e O N q 0 8 V.E O•L� V C � LpC e� Qg.q`vo p� >rVq���EE V C V V g C L L C N O O r > O M �.J rl E C q C = G P C ; C ° p°� P� Oa SLC = V q U� Py E r O r q g q O C a V °yam i c uo Lem �' cc .q. q d U ON qv a�C N Cr d dy�N La qG� ruriL °e ico_: Uq 90'= v L n .cov? L _ J ire Ne N d Y ouo V ti C aP° ra C L P q C y q V 1 C L p `_ U r L 6 6 O d V L N V L O V L O V yyC i d O N F r i 4Ow p�V 4 t9 1-i N� c r 6 � M00 r a O w W V MOVi b o W O V a O O M Y t vai i P p 5 q O V V C V q a L q � d.0 NO � � o y 9 ^ d ou °c e�tK ec o°1 O N N r � O v ter° E o N C pC9 o� .Nun r L Ora a u G C C V e V L9 V a`a r V� �N Sre o O > v d Y q P l r V F 6 w q u 0 T 1' C r O L v 0 n.: C q � L P N C C q s m � r d y O N q ti M C q L v E 7 L W r C C q d d V L E r O O Sr c c y C S O C C T� d .L. V � O ° A Y v � V q E a - N L a p C O N C m° v L u ° � NcGa 7 V_ o _ � O S = V q O p T C � C.♦ 6L p O L C V q „ O �a iv .o L 0 = P c 6qV� _ r _ O q 6 Ewa 6PV �Lt c c N O PLO^ 06�EjV 2 r L d d i(O Cc ucsoao 9 � 0 V V U d� CCV _ • CV Laq E N uigd g C V N 6 N C v^ P ov T r � a r L t :E J Pw r�r`a +e� V C y Q N O N c g r O p C u q V r V C N d L L O O S y O O ti L pO I O p N CI .o-eae cr LOo �spaiv� f� f EM�O�i�a Nr ^= r'8erctN V'�ZrV��r L q ^ L Z V r O C 4 C Z r t q O Y V O ., sru mq�co y e O N q 0 8 V.E O•L� V C � LpC e� Qg.q`vo p� >rVq���EE V C V V g C L L C N O O r > O M �.J rl E P'1 qc q Na d.o.. t` °.. •I `. c✓c .L. u�D < O P E S 9 c U C q V G I S9N' •d+N p C SN ✓^ CSC 7 OLl •u 9 �P j J NZ 9 VN �� q ✓ cEV 6L � N N ` � L � D d q � d O ✓ I dy ✓ y q•_d p 6 N 11 9 C FJLLN C L C N I d 4 6 6 C q W V q q j "•�. Y �" a Ld C G v a ^ � q V N e 6✓ n^ N r Q V D d o 6.)9 Ta Li 9 nqL CVLn ✓GW � C �9 �^ NN Y° N �Y LP ZYG d wL^ cpL qY e CN p- N ^ q` -G mL 4 -J✓ - i � OL ��LL O r ✓L q ._ ° wCq p0 OC ~ GG gO 'GygC P ^i 2 yN� ° X-5 GUST L VV ONO £ 07 Nib C °O Vr V �L N � >•� TOi cEO T' .r °u o= i eN e— pia au� 6m uo PL ea L O.V6 NO °r6 ^C•p O L - °L yL ��GO. n EO TYG V R_ GC- O� j dV _ y� � � yE� I� q C L V F• G 6./ 4 1 1 i Q� r e^ 60.m O V 6 6 G q �L C W 2 S 6 N� y d `VI n D Y V q •• N r Y C w q N- • ° C O 4 G „ ` Y Y 9 ..• q q > ✓ O � Na -.•X L^ _O eD= N V q d P G O N O L V Y - ✓ V � L O� q =- �. = N ° ._ � � q 6' y U J 6 V d p Td � d y •'9' q V O Y! ^ L O J y q p W✓ p ^ _ r L° y� P pi F �= Q q �� f 7 G q �- • a q T V Y p � -✓ O L G q - nV � w D G O = C O C Q Y d L„ M p• y S ^ O P� O L L V q � S g d ^ En Oy 9` CV ^ wG C ^ qd TY� C✓` NO0 C dV� =` n 9 L O pa` - �Pd D •L'u N p' p C C av y d aTY^ 9 NO Q,Qid Aw VY LqL= Q q DV^ q0 '3L 6LC E�� p Y m V= _VV= ✓Q �y N•yq � «`o cgsy N °do ovm «.+ =NC era°, -� N G GGNd Oy = ^jCi EL qq = LNY N- T dw Cp Tz YA .-S �yC DL 2 9V OO�rO FFLI E LG L .bq w O qy 9 _E _ _s °, eC� nM CykB G p O -n ✓GJ �> lt. % L n TT�pV mC' CwG agsG AnOE C N L � O C G G V G J N2 aq `cq ca AG N E ✓� n- o � G d d G _T. = c vLV9 q qV NLP Iry YOV d ]• A✓ C QO N C" G._c L O Y Oe- ` °p 6N� y ^ TV ✓ N 6 � CJC^ GdN G ELp pTG ey —G C e ✓ e � x, aL.,o ^O 8 6� _° P c� ccn ` —=� —�°1 4 ^q q•`GGG L o —L V _ G E � 9q� OLN ` q✓� q M ww C �' ` NON NN d_ >6C '✓^ _ =V N Nom^ CLCO VG _n0 NN_ N ✓�N <N rte <N- E va ~��qq 6NSVldV - C O <'4 ^OS1 < FVO wNG G✓ a rM9 SN.O+ 1 P'1 a L n E 0 E oLt..cr °a -tee s_Q` .. c ^' -p• rn La N y P qrc L N F ✓ T L L C N ?�^ y E y d° L N- O E ^u L n r ^v �ti � °am n- a .Lao Vcur rE 1 P � F P u m a N ✓ r PO w n O 4 d Y. C 0 = G N a w O C N e� c ^J C`� � V a y` pi G N c rA. .O• q t O O p L Cj a A C V n a A� W t J O G V /LJ �� O^ f r E > c PQ '° j n i m S.] C LL T? g CL ^wL0 •a. d Cy .CI d. .r O C COJL r.J✓ L OL_ AC Zm .O n AuV aoe a LNC.Or Ty � NdIO �rqr SC L ' 'ate � d6° y0 r0 -6 qr� OY C S C La•J =0 .+VSN Pf 70 V L a O u^ y y � O N J V y r r� l L V EF yN LE •ar a q9 y' dA. N'. l0aq 6.nG .'O O✓ C {6 OOF = �° `r d0 O WVL- V Cy OMCO yCT Ea✓ ✓ =C V A � l L a N J✓ G� ` q U 6y .9 •+`� C CN _° Vd�L 4 ^L dp °6rO aV =• ��a O. �T U ra run a' u' rO.s.. aNaVn t aL 6i e. _ N V s a P,° E N aL r O y N d O �a •a°+ ✓VGS °'V `Li^) LN JV �O Gb uJ` LCP_> VPO7L• -ea O 6 LP A ✓.•C. 9 ^ N Cy, ` °✓ ry�j MO y O y O O n C P E J^ O ? d Pr 0 r C P L C^ ° A A P JI N v 6 q C j T d a n O L d ZeI C c ^� VLO d6Aa LV � NrO >J .0 N�°6rr `a tl` =A N✓ O LJ O.^ 7 EYV O.aO> ON T.0 +N � kCw. N =' P✓ V J y 6 l C C ` d 0r E^ 'r 9 J 0 0 V .r L. 2' T O V N OH 6000 ILmaa 0 6 OPO OI y= Md Pda l�`� O O C�C OI �I V-1 J 1 W� c c a` d y _ .s. Jy_VL AA ^oY$06 m CE °a EL "� <w nti c aLLr ^a+a _qcw �£ J_O_ =VO Y • w N a�rOV P_N NL O.t SVtO _ d � � OC 4T O aO yOC �rV NJV �.} CCaV C >O L.r.. VE �r'nL _°de C d^ vN VJ C O VCW ON n{IO OJN^" y C 9 V° _nJ O N r r •" P m a n n TS ^ 6r r ✓�� y N d O C. O L p N V 4.iC sdl� Ga 90 C�rr`La, 'O rd V✓ �E V� ^9 ."aV eN CL C r` Oa LV 6L •", (J4r C... 6Vr _J O✓ C OVCn a' =✓ d �O N_ r•'f ry a 415. d q N a0 N N V L M V C _. dq.nrV X00. L r_° V .v O a i N _ V ✓rL] ] y 7 a N N Cr d. N V C` Y q ^ J 9 L] d V C F O m N A MN 22"; U lG T`H^ 4 �N q LI PLL P� OLM PE._y.r dy r� •L..0 Eq dCC ^r ° V O � • ° 1� N l 9 •.n `� C O � V� u O L ` � N n V d q u u a o. z •! i a y a s� y LI a n sl it CI f�1 �• N p 1 •I N ^I V � �� OI Ni � 1 I Yal I I L O E 0 E .pq N nv_ x i J a L « n a v. ✓ t✓ a C Y 4 L N N ✓ °^ L y N t o o = N N 'y1'.r �.)a NCOAd rC N q4 ^1_Q> � e � Q n „.. ✓9Y nV APO � uC yyQ9r ^ 'n - a ^,4� K Y q G D 60 � ✓ t� - a Y C9 L 9^ LL d�Y VO L OE^ ^L46` AA L C.9D pV LU nY q V L N d � ay W N q C C W✓ O W � j ✓ r Cry C Y L_ 9 N y 06 I F 6V ^P Ca 9u nL LY CV -.'t Vtr y �p t O' . G Cy•• �qNt Yy� �. 'f L C 6 N2 � Di0^ nr.LtO ✓WtN EL Ed 9eLY✓ N aN Lim L °s N as..�Ge aW ca n n` y A � y � eq vD ^ y L d .^ N O L C^ 6Y O rt•O.a �yDL O� AYVG YC 6 VS ^Y O� NG qN N-r r-� d� r O P V aC P N� L 4 �dP `9LU0 V ^V IP T � V 7^ VV y ^Y L6PMO IY dD �'^� >N -4L 6 M V N 9 W N N O N O« O Q V 6^ W✓ N L L V S n V y 9 Z P ... u c Y M d {"1 V✓ b J V 9 i V I n c P +> O C9 9V v: rc. o✓ N L o O . Y C a y . N O JY d N °D F'✓ 00 Lp J. � CV v— N u0 .9ey0 L'^ aL dNy^ <V N ° ✓YY NE° ai° NG T• �i°. o . 4 dY p q q q q ^ ` ✓ acy ^Yp y u .+ L EqY V E L L d .^ d E N ay 1 NG ^D Na` m_ T✓ NN �n D Wr- ✓ � VN ✓ a d ,^ULC M uLi i I a O 4 I a l I C u I D C O uy v J O O T y GN O ^AT� n0� 9= NrE r. ✓.'v`Pm �W rn ^V I LAP` ..�P �4 +[4 pN Vi i✓YL.� G� id Y L` � n g r J J -J 6 V Jt V✓ l E a F ✓ P N m �✓ 4 sp L c c «nu au✓ oLO <JC� .'oi °I voers <L E tl e F d L n P T c .+ V P ^ q `°V T N '} w• O C V O C O q'^ q W C ^ C L v ` G r c � 6N l � a T ^. d L Q N � 6 V 9 � q 9 b e a-5 N 1 i V ma O T � E E q V C r r w" O dam' > ^ W _ o m G > V 9Gq yQ E V y i d O Cy i C b c L q q � O IC N Q-� N Y. O S O C O C CO i T V r L Dy N T n.� d L d 'e a i ^ ^I r L _ CI q U O w 0 G d 9 an •L- ol O O P O V v i a ^ i V C 0 d c NI O c O vq _T U E 0 O r NI u e > i Lr v Q m N� C C ^ q m _ i N CI 6 L iI 01 9 ca y n Ci dl 1 C7 1 9 C r tV 6 e d L L q n n v � o c p ` O Y m C a � 4 O a c „ O 6 q E ` ^ u mr L C m n> i 6 6 C T^ o= n nV N y G O 9 y C q�E y S W O W 9 V O � C W bo a ` c 9 C q �^ L No O N rLi N N� T Q w P N P. n y P� 9J CQ bm ` w L r T D O q y cc cD° f k y J V D N • O) O G L v V C a N O i � L N d u V V O P N C y 9 y ^ W y aw g V 2 V p a w N d v •^ q �V q D r 9 O b q LpY• N ^_ N q 9 ��• G C 9 O byNL i ��• qS0 OOC ^� 6�fOn NJr= C q � S V y V V ` V V N O ^ n =oq y y a O O m 6 C O w^ V Y u �O l Vr' �y4 S O L T Q c 5 7 N N O N q L 4 L V L 2 rdi d� N M y C d m� s.e LP aY c N n 9 n w V � O L Y L t �• �• ° �'�'♦ QO.N QwyT IN�T O G L v V C a N O i � L N d u V V t� E E O P N C ^ W y aw P L M 2 V p L w 7 r N 9 i O P r C q � S V y V C a N V V N O ^ n p y y L u l r y O y V C e d m� s.e LP aY c N ^D Y� V ♦ V C q G � Y �r 9 Mw t N = Y 6 r o• T O t� E E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COND11IONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12414 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 1241?, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Almar Corporation, applicant, for the puipose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamn;g!, County of Sar Bernardino, State of California, described as a total development and subdivision of 12.3 acres into 93 lots, regularly cam before the P.anninq Commission for public hearing and action on June 8, 1 WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended apprcval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering anu Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division °s reports and has --onsidered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12414 and the Map the•eof: (a) The tentative -tract is cr -:4 s; nt with all applicable interim and propes,:d general and specific plans; (b) consistent with all improvements cabletienterimtand proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or tt,eir habitat; (e) The tentative trztt is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. n Resolution No. Page 2 (9) That this project the environment issued. will not create adverse impacts on and a Negative Declaration is SECTION 2: Ten ative Tract Map No. 12414, a copi of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Side elevations visible to the public shall be "broken up" with architectural details designed to provide visual relief and interest. 2. Architectural detailing shall be provided on garage doors which is consistent with the archi`ecture of the main structure. 3. Two story units lying adjacent to common area pathways she'll be "tiered" two -story in order to reduce the "tunnel effe:t" caused by the units proximity to the cz)mmon area pathway. 4. Special landscape features shall be provided at all common area entrances designed to funnel residents into the common area, while provid4rg a grand entrance gateway. 5. Concept "C" roof lines shali be "stepped down ", with descending gable roofs, in order to project a continuous roof theme. 5. F,dditiinal entrance features (entrance monuments, special landscaping, etc.) shall be provided to the mair, entrance gateways located along Mignonette Street. In addition, special landscape features shall b� provided along Mignonette and Beryl Streets, designed to provide a continuous theme to the development. 7. A solid concrete block wall shall be provided adjacent to existing single- family dwellings, located along Beryl and Nignonette Streets. 8. The R.V. storage area =hall be centered between the proposed dwelling units to the south and Mignonette Street to the north, in order to provide adequate buffers. In addition, the parking stalls are to be angled to provide additional maneuvering ;pace. E 11 u U Resolution No. Page 3 9. Garages shall be enlarged to approxi-�,iately 18 x 19 in order to accommodate two standard sized automobiles. 10. The easterly cul -de -sac shall be reduced to a diameter of 51 feet in order to provide for an enlarged landscaped strip adjacent to Beryl Street. 11. Parcels surrounding the common area shall use low patio or garden walls 36 -inch high maximum. Cpen v4ew type fencing (architecturally intecrated with the main structure) may also be used, not to exceed 6 feet. ENGINEERING DIVISION 12. Flood control measures shall be provided alonr, Beryl Street which include curb, gutter, etc. improvements shall extend from the proposed "bubbler structure" to the existing catch basin locatri south of the project. The storm drain system stall be designed for a 100 -year flood. He BY' - BY: Rempel, Chairman ATTEST : eE,•2tary of tt:e Planning Commission - I, JACK LAN, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify t at the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 81th day of June, 19831 by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E APPROVED AND ADOPT ED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA He BY' - BY: Rempel, Chairman ATTEST : eE,•2tary of tt:e Planning Commission - I, JACK LAN, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify t at the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 81th day of June, 19831 by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E A El .2 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 8, 1983 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7972 - t INC. - A division of 8.5 acres into 2 lots wttnin 5uoarea 3 of the Industrial Specific Plan located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Helms Avenue - APN 209- 021 -25 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: a division of 8.5 acres into 2 parcels. B. Puraose: to separate developed portion from remainder of site. C. Location: at the soutt.�ast corner of Arrow Route and Helms Avenue. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 5.5 acres Parcel 2 - 3.0 acres Total 879--n-a: acres E. Existing Zoning: Subarea 3, General Industrial. F. Existing Land Use: Parcel 1 - Vacant Parcel 2 - Existing Industrial Building, Pneudraulics, Inc. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - single family residential - R -1 South - Pacific Fabrication - general industrial East - Cucamonga Business Park - general industrial Wept - Metropolitan Wire Industrial - general industrial H. General Plan Desionations: North - residential- Tow South - Subarea 3 - general industrial East - Subarea 3 - general industrial West - Subarea 3 - general industrial I. Site Characteristics: The site slopes approximately 2% from north to south. Parcel No. 1 is vacant. Parcel No. 2 contains an ixisting 45,000 sq. ft. industrial building. ITEM H Planning Comissicn Staff Report ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AID PARCEL MRP 7972 - PNEUDRAULICS, INC. June 8, 1983 Page 2 I;. ANALYSIS: Pneudr�ulics, Inc. owner of the property is requesting this land division in order to separate the developed portion (Parcel 2) from the remainder of the site. Curb, gutter and pavement are existing on both Arrow Route and Helms Avenue. Sidewalk, street iig:its, drive approaches and landscaping for Parcel No. I will be required at time of development. All improvements adjacent Lo the existing industrial building have been completed. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project... If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. fully su :jaa Attachments: Parcel Map, Project Site Map Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study 11 I] 0 � c i11Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA " INITIAL STUDY ,02 PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $67.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form ;rust be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. !Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare _ Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten 00 days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information -epo:t should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7972 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: (7143 980-1.11 dAtta. LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 8575 Helm,, Avenue- Rarrha fso amnnaa„ Cc 21z3D u. 20c)-02-1- 2- LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Southern California Gas Company Foothill Fire District General Telephone I -1 C C PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To divide existing lot into two parcels. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Lot is '. 5 acres, the existing building is 45.000 Sn_ ft_ DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION nF ANY EXISTING'STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): south and east sides. The land gently slopes from north to south at anproximately 2 %_ Is this project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? I -2 11 ® WILL THIS PROJECT: El YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? _ X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? X. 6. Create the need for use or disposal of - _ potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fiammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Oates �� 3 Signature Title MICHAEL E. SAVILLE. CONTROLLER I -3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The flowing information should be provided to the City of Rancho uca=,ga Planni Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school trict to accommodate the proposed residential developm nt. Name of Devel er and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Locatio of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 P4 AE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed t —� begin constructi on: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model # and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range I -4 RESOLUTION NO. * 4D A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7972 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7972), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND HELMS AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7972, submitted by Pneudraulics, Inc. and consisting of 2 parcels, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Helms Avenuc, being a division of a portion of the southeast 1/4 of Section 10 marked "Eddis" as shown on map of Cucamonga Lands, Book 4, page 9, San Bernardino County, California; and WHEREAS, on April 28, 1983, a formal application was submitted - requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 1983, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Genera: Plan. 3. That the site is p1 :vsically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed sub:ivi<_ion and improvements will riot cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project wilt not create significant adverse environmental and a Negative Declaration is issued on June 8, 1983. SECTION 3: fiat Tentative Parcel Map No. 7972 is approved subject to the recommender Conditions of Approval perYaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Herman Rempel, C airman 2 Resolution No. ?age 2 ATTEST: Te-7retary of the Planning Commission 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of June, 1983, by the foiiowing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: LJ LJ CM OF RAr_CHO CUCAMONGA is RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: Southeast corner of Arrow Route TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7972 and Helms Avenue DATE FILED: 41128/83 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of the southeast NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 1/4 Section 10 Marked "Eddis" as shown on Map GROSS ACKAGE: 8.5 of Cucamonga Lands, Book 4 of Maps, Page 9 ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 209- 021 -25 of San Bernardino County, Caiirorm a DEVELOPER OWNER ENGIHEER/SURVEYOR Pneudrauiics, Inc. same Linville- Sanderson 8575 Helms Avenue 9587 Arrow, Ste. H Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areis shall be provided by C.C. &R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. L 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. 0 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Sure`•• X 1. Surety shalt be Dosted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to building permit issuance for Parcel 1. 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and/or prior to issuance of building permit for Street Improvements Pursuant to the city of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subidiver may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct f�.Il street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half- section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to building permit issuance for Parcel 1. Street Name Curb & I Gutter A.C. Si e- Pvmt. Walk Drive Street Street r. Trees Lights A. Me ian Overla Island* Other U I-S A. X X Arrow Rte. X X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation or meter E X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees from shall be paid and in encroachment permit shall be obtained to other permits the City Engineer °s Office, in addition any required. X 5' Street mv shall Civil an Engineer and approved by t eCity Egeerp-r o issuance of e encroachment permit. X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the or other existing public utilities relocation of any power poles as necessary. X 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be urdergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, types approved by the striping and markings with locations and City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the the City of Rancho Southern California Edison Company and Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground Cucamonga. service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved of building permit. by the Planning Division prior to the issuance ® 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. required and shall be 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction —� of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation cf the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineering for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff 4 r` M Grading X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be ir accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California. to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordatior of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. ?ermits from other agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control istrict. X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X_ 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 0 X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When hui'oinn permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will he asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for �� and /or prior to building permit issuance or 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City — covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment nistr;rt 87--1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. L 11 CITY OF RANCHO =WNGA LLOYD B. MBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: 11 E E 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1„ DATE: June 8, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC an regarding development standards for interim ;uses. SUMMARY: This report discusses interim lari, uses within the Industrial peca is Plan (ISP) urea. Recently, staff received a request from a property owner wanting to utilize a site on an interim basis (5 years) as a recreat=onal vehicle storage facility. The ISP currently does not contain regulations which would permit interim uses of land without compliance with the development standards. At the Commission's request, staff has prepared this report and proposed amendment for temporary and interim uses within the Plan area. ANALYSIS: It would seem reasonable to allow interim uses on a temporary basis prior to development. one of the primary objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan is to encourage development by eliminating uncertainty of time and money. However, the ISP is intended to also promote attractive and high quality design. Therefore, there are two issues to be dealt with: (1) what interim development standards/ improvements should be required; and, (2) how to insure that ultimate development occurs in accordance with ISP regulations. Minimum standards for landscaping and screening can be developed which meet the design objectives of the ISP. Even as an interim use of land, staff would recommend compliance with grading and drainage, street improvement requirements, and other improvements necessary for the public safety, health, and general welfare of the community and surrounding properties. Staff has provided a suggested list of interim use development standards in the attached Resolution. Ultimately, the standards would have to to met within a given period of time or the use removed in order to retain the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan. Interim uses should not be allowed as a means to circumvent the standards of the ISP. A Conditional Use Permit would be the best process by which the Commission can retain the authority over removal of the interim use and the ultimate development of the land ITEA I Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 83 -01 June 8, 1983 Page 2 it coniormance with the ISP. Staff would recommend an initial two (2) year approval, with extensions up to a maximum of five (5) years. At the end of the five years, the use wouid be considered permanent and compliance with standards or removal of the use would be required. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Initial Study and found that this amen ment will not result in any significant adverse impacts upon the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper and a copy of the staff report was sent to the Chamber of Commerce. To date, no correspondence either for or against this amendment has been received. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a pu is caring and consider all public input. If the Commission is satisfied with the proposed amendment, adoption of the attached Resolution ano issuance of a Negative Declaration would he in order. ly submitted, anner :DC:jr Attachments: April 27, 1983 Staff Report Minutes of April 27, 1983 Planning Commnission Meeting Initial Study, Part I Resoluton El E. El 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUC�AONGA � asnA, k STAFF REPORT oIl � DATE: April 27, 1983 19" TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: SUBJECT: Michael liairin, Senior Planner SUMMARY: Albt:,+ W tidies, a general engineering contractor who cwns property located :n Subarea 3 of the Industrial Specific Plan (ISP) on the southeast corner of Helms Avenue and 9th Street, has requestea direction regarding the development of an interim use of that site. '4r. Davies is considering utilizing the site on an interim basis as a recreational vehicle storage facility without developing the site ;:o the required minimum landscaping and screening standards as outlined in the ISP. Staff has spoken with Mr. Davies about this and has indicated that the ISP currently does not contain regulations which wo•.ld permit interim uses of land without compliance with the development standards. Therefore, staff has recommended the*_ this :gem be brought before the Planning Commission tc : t -`•cI' direction regarding the options available for the Commission to consider. Generally, there are two alternatives available to the Commission: 1. Require the development of the site to be in conformance with the minimum industrial Specific Plan standards for landscaping and screening; or, 2. Direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan for consideration by the Planning Commission which would provide a mechanism for reviewing interim uses along with interim standards in the industrial area prior to permanent industrial development. BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of the letter from Mr. Davies which exp sins his request and intentions for the development of this site. Also attached is a copy of the site plan which indicates his basic idea regarding the interim use of the facility for a recreational vehicle storage yard. ITEM J Planning Commissi<- Direction /A.W. Davies April 27, 1983 Page 2 I rA 5 I The applicant's proposal has raised this issue because it does not meet the development standards as prescribed by the Industrial Specific Plan for Subarea 3. A storage use of this natu •e would require the review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission and would require such improvements as: 1. Twelve percent (12%) of the lot to be landscaped. 2. All storage areas shall be screened from public view by a concrete or masonry wail. 3. An average landscape setback shall be provided along 9th Street and Helms Avenue at an average depth of twenty -five (25) feet as measured from the face of the curb. As can be seen, the applicant's interim development would not meet the landscaping and screening standards of the Industrial Plan. The Industrial Plan presently does not contain a mechanism which would allow deviation from these standards, even as an interim use. If the Commission sees the need for haling flexibility to allow interim uses in the industrial area prior to actual permanent development, staff could prepare an amendment for consideration by the Planning Commission which would essentially permit interim uses to be reviewed by the Planning Commission through a Conditional Use Permit. Additionally, we could establ-sh some minimum time frames and standards such as the applicant has suggested with regard to chainlink fencing with slats and some landscaping for screening which continues to meet the design objectives of the ISP. Even as an interim use of land, staff would recommend that such a project should still comply with other standards such as grading and drainage, street improvements, and other improvements necessary for tie public safety, health, and general welfare of the community and surrounding properties. These areas could be adequately addressed through the normal development review process which would require the applicant to develop the appropriate plans to show conceptual drainage and grading plans. The critical issue :s the ultimate improvement of the site. The standards of the Industrial Specific Plan would have to be met within a given period of time in order to retain consistency with the type of development projected by the Industrial Specific Plan. A Conditional Use Permit process would be the best process by which the Commission can retain the authority over the removal of the interim use and the ultimate development of the land in conformance with the Industrial Specific Plan. C Planning Co missi(- Direction /A.W. Davies April 27, 1983 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission discuss this matter and provide direction to the applicant and staff with regards to the two alternatives discussed in this report. ly spomi tted, tylPlanner :MV:jr (Attachments: Letter From Albert W. Davies Dated April 6, 1983 1 Exhibit W - Proposed Site Plan .&LMMR,"r W. DAVIM89 INC. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR ConrlucTDrt LICX [ 88A 596639 8737 2IELMS AVENUE • POST OFFICE BOX 215 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 (714) 289-3714 (714) 98"'ItRA April 5, 1983 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 3aseline Road Suite "C" Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission Subject R. V. Storage, Location Ninth Street & Helms Ave. Attention: Jack Lam Gentlemen, We would like to offer for your consideration our plan to utilize our property includin,- the exist- ing building, located at 8737 Helms Ave: (sc-u -heast corner of Ninth & Helms) for a.L V. Sr 3rage and a ?etail Store for R. V. Supplies. Originally this site was planned for industrial buildings, but due to economic conditions and excessive vacancies in our area this is net feasable at this time. We've found through research that the city has a need for R. V. Storage and ad01Lional facilities such as we're going to offer. Geographically this appears to be a desirable location, convenient for those :Thom would elect to use iz This would put our now vacant land to good use, along with generating more jobs and revenue for the city. At this time we seek your direction before pro- ceeding any further. 'vie interpret screening in the specific plans as block wall. At this time needless to say it is very expensive for a new business. 11 L.J E 0 r] l eter six foo * hi h chain in li k r fence that we would like to maintain and r&_guest in- stalling redwood type slats for screening. Another reason for rot Navin .--, thr, block wall at this time, would be in the event the R. V. o-usincss did not �e- -come profi *_able, we would resort back, to the original plans and build industrial buildings on this property. At that time there could be no need for the block :ti311. .e would havc to ren -love it LO cOZp1V with future designs. renatively we would request a variance for up to `ive years. At the end of this period we would comply with the city's requirement. Hopefully if the business is sucessful % could look for expansion to the balance of the property on the south to the railroad right or way. We presentiv o-wn from Ninth St. to the railroad on the south and all the property could be taken into consideration for the master plan. Je have been in business and residence in tl,e ..ucamonga area a good number of years and look for - ward to many more. "hank you for your consideration. :,incerely. Albert .1. Davies -a:rD /sd I; II Iyi 1 J F _ f i I ICJ c. JL.-rc { s pn E1 is U 1 J ��• S T 1 1 J 1 1 1 I CITY OF rrE`i. _ R.A,NCHO CUCAMONGA TrIFU: ME12M 'S-M 01A-S I'LANNING DIVISION EX1119- = SCAT.£- V 0I LI v M 1 � 'ice// F• � � "� 1 I � E. .. '.:.> FORTH CITY OF rrE`i. _ R.A,NCHO CUCAMONGA TrIFU: ME12M 'S-M 01A-S I'LANNING DIVISION EX1119- = SCAT.£- 11 could not be built on could be transferred to adjoining lands owned by which c piece of property and the same owner. Further, this must be a contiguous p cannot be transferred from one area to another. Commissioner Stout asked for clarification of the County's overall density bonus program. Mr. Stevens replied that the County's position is that 100 -120% of the median is allowed to go up to 50% density bonus. He explained that low or moderate income housing could go up to NO% density bonus. This is a major policy of the County and a major issue of many cities. He pointed out that the most likely area for affordable housing would be the area south of the power lines, to 25th Street. Further, he was not suggesting affordable housing; however, was not an issue that could be eliminated in the Plan. Chairman Remp ,21 invited public comment on this item. pam Henry, Rancho Cucamonga resident, addressed the Commission s: °'_ing that she was concerned with the lack of a trails policy in the Plan. She suggested that the Commission recommend direction to the County establishing a trails plan consistent with the City's General Plan. Chris Benoit, Rancho Cucamonga resident, stated her concern that the clustered housing proposed by the Com;amnity Plan would not be compatible with the existing and proposed housing in Etiwanda. She suggested that the Commission look at development in this area and discourage any development that would be incompatible with the City's General Plan. Chairman Rem�mpel thanked the County staff for giving the Commission the opportunity to provide input on the Community Plan. J. Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the staff report and askea LnaL Laic planning Commission provide direction to either require development of the site in conformance with the Industrial Specific Plan standards, or direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan. Chairman Rempel invited Mr. Davies to comment on his request. Mr. Davies stated that this may not be the potential use for this piece of property and felt that the expense of a screening wall would be too great if the business did not survive and the fence had to be torn down. Planning Commission Minutes -11- April 27, 1983 C Commissioner Stout asked what Mr. Davies intends to do if the use is successful. Mr. Davies replied that if the use was successful, he would possibly expand the entire six acrss to the railroad tracks.- Commissioner Stout asked if Mr. Davies would then be willing to complete all of the improvements required by other parcels within the Industrial Specific Plan area. Mr. Davies replied that he would expand according to what is being used. He referred to a letter received from Rick Gomez which contained a statement requiring 25 -feet of landscaping and questioned the need for that amount of landscaping. Commissioner Barker asked if the applicant would be willing to put in the improvements at the end of the five year period. Mr. Davies replied that he had made a Y_rbai commitment that if the business is successful, he would improve tie property earlier. Commissioner Barker asked how the City would be assured that important improvements would be completed under a temporary use. Mr. Gomez replied that staff would %4°velop a program for the Commission's review outlining the minimum improvemet:ts for a temporary or interim use. Commissioner Barker asked if the applicant is now using the property for storage. Mr. Gomez replied that the property is now vacant, therefore if the applicant desires to utilize the site he would have to comply with the requirements Industrial Specific Plan. Chairman Rempei pointed out that the prior use was a construction yard, therefore under the City Code this purpose would be "grandfathered" in. Mr. Gomez responded that once a non - conforming use is terminated it would have to conform after a certain period of time to the standards as adopted. Mr. Lam stated that the issue is that Mr. Davies has a need to find out if the Commission would or would not be sympathetic to the issue of allowing provisions in the ISP to allow for temporary or interim uses. If the Commission sees a need for temporary uses, the staff needs the direction oa which to base the amendment such as what constit :es a temporary use, length of time the use can remain temporary, what types of screening alternatives would be acceptible, etc. He further stated that if the Planning Commission is not sympathetic to the issue, Mr. Davies does not need to pursue his request any further. Planning Commission Minutes -12- April 27, 1983 Ll Ll Chairman Rempel stated that the ISP does not contain a storage type of use other than a contractor`s yard. Further RV storage yards, or any type of public storage, are not addressed in the Gene. ral Plan or the Industrial Specific Plan. Mr. Gomez stated that Table 11I -1 contains uses for auto fleet storage, which staff interpretes as consistent with RV storage with a Conditional Use Permit with minimum landscape standards. Further, the issue is not the use, but the amendment regarding the application under temporary or interim uses. Chairman fempel stated thr-t that the 12% interior landscaping which is required under fleet storage should be examined because it may not be necessary in a use where vehicles are parked. Commissioner Stout stated that there is no way to make a decision unless the Commission decides to consider the possibility of temporary uses and suggested that staff ccnduct a study showing mitigating factors and alternatives. The Commission could then discuss these and decide whether or riot to proceed. He also suggested that street improvements, drainage, and bonding for these improvements should be examined. Mr. Lam pointed out that other uses in the City have provisions for interim or temporary uses. In these temporary uses, all street and drainage improvements are installed. He further stated that the Commission needs to provide direction as :o the type of acceptible screening for a temporary use. Commissioner Stout stated that another issue would be if the temporary use is of such a nature that its size or nature would be in conflict with the permanent use. Mr. Lam responded that this could 5e mitigated by determining how long the temporary use would be allowed before reaching a permanent status. Chairman Rempel stated that the Commission needs to also decide what types of temporary uses wouid be allowed. The consensus of the Planning Commission was for staff to conduct a study regarding temporary and interim uses within the Industrial Specific Plan area for presentation to the Comri�,s :an at a later date. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, to continue past the 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. Planning Commission Minutes -13- April 27, 1903 C C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Re-:iew Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the, project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informs= tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: j /MW r MME. ADDR=SS, TELEPHONE:_ NAME, ADDRESS, 4 6t171-:5o OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 11 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FR, ACAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AG :'NCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 E 11 E E PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND-SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: DESCRIBE THE ENVIRC`?METNT L SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE -_ _•� = _16N ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), INCLU'D'E. r \ _ ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? NO 1-2 C C WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO -Z 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or -tibration? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or gen-ral plan designations? _ Ve"' 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? ✓ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fiammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on r.he next page. 11 CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required submitted a an adequate evaluation C be made by a 7ev&l!oPment ev- w ommittee. Date 3—S igna re l Title I- 3 C� J E 0 11 RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RECOMMENDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN REGARDING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INTERIM USES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing in order to consider amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission seeks to provide for interim uses prior to full development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the Industrial Area Specific Plan be amended as follows: SECTION 1: That Part III, Section II (Page 111 -2), Land Use Types, ba amende to Inc ude interim uses, as follows: Interim Uses Interim uses ether than those listed in Table III -1 shall be permited, provided that such uses and their locations shall not preclude full development in accordance with the development regulations of the Plan. Agricultural uses, including roadside stands, and private parks and picnic areas are permitted uses prior to development. Parking and storage areas, park -and -ride lots, and other uses similar in charater shall be permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit and shall be approved for a twc (2) year period. Extensions may be granted up to an additional 36 months far a maximum time limit not to extend more than five (5) years beyond the original date of approval. At the end of fiva (5) years, the use shall be removed or the site developed in accordance with full development regulations of the Plan. SECTION 2: That Part III, Section III (Page III -33), Development Standards, a amen ed to add subsection H, as follows: Resolution Na. Paoe 2 E H. Interim Use Standards The purpose of interim use standards is to establish minimum standards for setbacks, landscaping, screening, and parking which meet the intent of the Plan. Unless specifically modified through the Conditional Use Permit, all other development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall apply, including, but not limited to, grading and drainage, and street improvements. The following standards shall apply in all areas of the Plan: H.I. The minimum streetscape and parking setback requirement shall be contiguous with the ultimate right -of -way line, but in no case less t'ran ten %10) feet, H.2. There shall be no minimum landscape coverage requirement, except that which is necessary for screening purposes as determined by the City Planner. H.3. All parking and storage areas shall be paved with slag, crushed aggregate, asphaltic concrete or concrete. The location, number and design of said parking shall be in accordance with the Plan. H.4. All parking and storage areas, and other interim uses which require screening as determined by the City Planner, shall be screened from public view through a combination of landscaping and fencing. Fencing may include a 6` chain link fence with slats, masonry or concrete, wood, or decorative metal. Screening must be maintained in good condition at all times. H.5. Landscaping required for screening purposes shall include 15- gallon trees end 5- gallon shrubs to provide a dense landscape buffer to afford maximum screening from the public view, satisfactory to the City Planner. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission finds that this amendment will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment and, therefore, recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF k.SNCHO CUCAMONGA 0 Resolutson No. Page 3 M BY: Hernan Rempel, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary OT the PlaIIIIIIISI tmuzsszon I, JACK LAM Secretary hereby erf ethat ntheg for going nResolutionCiw. odu7 anandd Cucamonga, regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coinnission of the City of R.ar+cbo Cucamonga, at a Yetheafoi owing vote-to-wit: Planning Commission held on the 8th day of June, 1983, by : AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 L] 11 �J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 8, 1983 TD- Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY- Dan Coleman, As56Cia ±o Planner SUBJECT: E UESTRIAN TP: +I! GUIDELINES - Amen0 ng P.esolution 81 -53 estab fishing rail esign standards SUMMAP.Y: In conjunction with adoption of the Trails Element of the General Plan in 1981, the Commission and Council adopted resolutions setting forth design standards for regional, community -:_ vocal feeder trails. Through their review of projects within the equestrian rural area, the Equestrian Advisory Committee has found a need to refine these trail standards. Staff has worked with the Colinittee in preparing the attached standard drawings for the Commission's review and consideration. ANALYSIS: The basic provisions of the adopted trail standards remain unchanged' such as trail width, grading, drainage and surfacing requirements. The following is a summary of important changes: o More precise streetscape design standards for community trails, including fencing, landscaping, and perimeter block wall design. o Design standards for trail entrances, such as gates, vehicle barriers, and step - throughs or step - overs. o Trail fencing specifications for extruded concrete fences (community trails) and wood split rail fences (local feeder trails). o Standards for parkwav "water barn runoff deflectors for north -south trails subject to erosion. ITEM J Equestrian Trail Guidelines Planning Cemaission Agenda June 8, 1983 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: The Equestrian Advisory Committee recommends that the Planning Corsmission adopt the attached Resolution 81 -53 A establishing trail design standards. A ly syjaitted, ty Manner ,:DC:jr Attach - rents: Equestriar: Trail Guidelines Resolution 81 -53 Resolution 81••53A S C IM Ll city of rancho Cucamonga I 1sil 1=ACC Mw srr- SPLrr !fit L F1'[GE STV. 1?p*4. STANDARD DRAWING 5 d l: CUT 5LOPL �iN /S!fi �'[AEaFACE y9.i't''f� TO :��f.�EX Easton -'OTI CAL SG. -QON sTV t wo. �3 'rYA7l. I '.er QSr- Lcsr GO¢riSF C-w Far- vem=-8 Access T?40� L ]5' 1Y GAL PLAN �'tol MAY �� �c:�?-�� a� t= A-r- TF -r UNDi:YEL.J ?EI7 ��iiict- �T(�L. L.p.�}�. ft;s - Qr*,&-DIFVv 1 j7R�:; 1t; Sut lCy.� r°t iD OiH6K- SF° FICATt�NS� cclsc THE o7NeR 'E;4 : of TH7s SHEM -r. 'l LOCAL FEEDER TRAIL Lcity enewss► r c.4k. 23889 dale 1001 E DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 1. Vertical Grade: 0 -5% optimum 10% maximum for distances over 500' 15% maximum for distances limited to 500' 20% permitted only in extreme cases and for short distances under 100' �. Cross Section: 3. Drainage: 4. Side Slope cuts and Fill: 5. Surfacing: 6. Overhead Clearance: 7. Flood and Drainage Channel Crossings: 8. Trail Entrance: 1 -4% optimum 6% maximum in approved locations only Where trail gradient exceeds 4 %, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be required. Sea the City Equestrian Trails and Drainage Standard 813. 2:1 maximum Trail surface shall be native soil, de- composed qranite or chopped tree trimmings. Remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. 10 feet E Where Community Trails cross existing or proposed drainage channels, the continuity of the trail shall be maintained by the construction of an appropriate crossing such as bridges, ramp ways, culverts, etc. Trail entrances shall be designed to pro- vide for equestrian, bicycling, and hiking use and discourage motor vehicles access (See Resolution 81 -93), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unob -. strutted vehicular access for service vehicles. E city of rancho cucamonga STANDARD DRAWING A&M &UIMM wlvrH or PLM4TEg AR-F-06. - 7E�1 t— ANp PAR.KINAY VA4z1E5. FUA44 NAEZNa r 4-y.ua-( Tf2^1 L. IQ +. D L 1 I LLL :o' 10' 2S' 40' Ion' hL-EJiTRUD6D GotvGRETE FViGL- )3LoL}c WALL Tf�t L 4� C.URB NCrMS: !. �--Aeh sHr.00w SeX PI.^"7MD WrrH 2 DFD:aulr!r -MLEF^H r YRCF-S. 2.Al -L PL-ANTED J.fl At. SB PLAyTF -D Y4mH AsamTHElCA CALL- HDLIL.4 (CAPE Naev) ISp o-c. . S. THE. 9L oGit L.y.L.L SHILL eS PL A-HTE tV WITH C_jLMarOjs Ft& (FLwS PUMIL..) Zo' O.G. 4. �,TKEGT TR6E5 544AL -1- M ZO'O•G. S NC> TDXLG PLANTS ARE FEt2Mn -TeV. �fZ G R°DLN+G —! D�.�tyr�Glc' I SL t3Z °GC ANt) OT} fi+tz ��'�%IFIGATECt�iS, �� -�-:� o-n -tE� sic: o� --r�r►s s�F�-f. COMMUNITY TRAIL- PARKWAY 20' � 1 002 city en0aeer r.c e. 23889 date 0 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 1. Vertical Grade: 0 -5% optimum 10% maximum for distances ever 500' 15% maximum for distances limited to 500' 20% permitted only in extreme cases and for short distances under 100' 2. Cross Section: 1 -4% optimum 6% maximum in approved locations only 3. Drainaae: Where trail gradient exceeds 4 %, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be required. See the City Equestrian Trails and Drainage Standard 813. 4. Side Slope Cuts and Fill: 2:1 maximum 5. Surfacing: Trail surface shall be native soil, de- composed granite or chopped tree trimmings. Remove rocks and debris and grade surface swooth. 6. Overhead Clearance: 10 feet 0 7. Flood and Drainage Channel Crossings: Where Community Trails cross existing or proposed drainage channels, the continuity of the trail shall be maintained by the construction of an appropriate crossing such as bridges, ramp ways, culverts, etc. S. Trail Entrance: Trail entrances shall be designed to pro- vide for equestrian, bicycling, and hiking use and discourage motor vehicles access (See Resolution 81 -93), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unob- structed vehicular access for service vehicles. 9. Street Crossings: Crossings shall be at grade with appropriate street striping and signing. For equestrian use, texturized paving is desirable in order to prevent horses from slipping. 11 city of rancho cucam®nga STANDARD DRAWING .1-rat E • CoNG. MNez- -TPl+t tr ;=o+- &KAOir�, vp.A4 a« SugriazE, AND [rrMelz �P 1FtcsaTiGtiS� 5� �'ra* S�rJE Cr- 'T�1'5 COMMUNITY TRAIL: PARKWAY 12' f 1003 ra..234a9 au. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 1. Vertical Grade: 0 -5% optimum 10% maximum for distances over 500' 15% maximum for distances limited to 500' 20% permitted only in extreme cases and for short distances under 100' 2. Cross Section: 1 -4% optimum 6% maximum in approved locations only 3. Drainage: Where trail gradient exceeds 49, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversio.-zary devices shall be required. See the City Equestrian Trails and Drainage Standard 813. 4. Side Slope Cuts and Fill: 2:1 maximum 5. Surfacing: Trail surface shall be native soil, de- composed granite or chopped tree trimmings. Remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. 6. Overhead Clearance: 10 feet 7. Flood and Drainage Channel Crossings: Where Community Trails cross existing or proposed drainage channels, the continuity of the trail shall be maintained by the construction of an appropriate crossing such as bridges, ramp ways, culverts, etc. 8. Trail Entrance: Trail entrances shall be designed to pro- vide for equestrian, bicycling, and hiking use and discourage motor vehicles access (See Resolution 81 -93), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unob- structed vehicular access for service vehicles. 9. Street Crossings: Crossings shall be at grade with appropriate street striping and signing. For equestrian use, texturized paving is desirable in order to prevent horses from slipping. 1 r city of rancho cacarnonga Zol ruBUG PCtCAmor[ xg-V- gRW9: i- ! STANDARD DRAWING TREES PLAHTE D 6Gy 0.G. "— n N ISH Lo-r LihiE� -dpi C.,b,L SeCrto NO-rE: HOMEOWNER oR. D'= YEt -cPER ;,�H It>'fA" A%t- TE4zNATE FEHr —C.. CR �l'L�f Ut�ES GALA. T17 DEF[HE "rF L FA'SEMr=HT• u`"it lI Cvsa[; [r--qu:RCD sq- rAae l-ar STa. ORN6. 100q S F:rsmce —f L.�N - , !t7T LING" H 0-rs : - fztm7- CV,4;*LDtH& I rJR,At�`CtE, SZSFFrGE s*r[D pTYs61Z 51°F.Ct�i�•TtohiS, 1 SSE THE OCHE{=- 5[DE of TFtly SHEET. COMMUNITY TRAIL: INTERIOR I 1004 city seyle.ar r e... 23882 del* j 11 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 1. Vertical Grade: 0 -5% optimum 10% maximum for distances over 500' 15% maximum for distances limited to 500' 20% permitted only in extreme cases and for short distances under 100' 2. Cross Section: 3. Drainage- 4. Side Slope Cuts and Fill: 5. Surfacing: 6. Overhead Clearance: 7. Flood and Drainage Channel Crossings: S. Trail Entrance: 9. Street Crossings: 14% optimum 6% maximum in approved locations only Where trail gradient exceeds 4 %, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be required. See the City Equestrian Trails and Drainage Standard 813. 2:1 maximum Trail surface shall be native soil, de- composed granite or chopped tree trimmings. Remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. 10 feet 11 Where Community Trails cross existing or proposed drainage channels, the continuity of the trail shall be maintained by the construction of an appropriate crossing such as bridges, ramp ways, culverts, etc. Trail entrances shall be designed to pro- vide for equestrian, bicycling, and hiking use and discourage motor vehicles access (See Resolution 81 -93), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unob- structed vehicular access for service vehicles. Crossings shall be at grade with appropriate street striping and signing. For equestrian use, texturized paving is desirable in order to prevent k:orses from slipping. city of rancho cacamonga 50, C4- 14JNLJNK Fr;Y'E l 5uN J-rl -v COY Pmvr/ 4 -ors K ON Mfpej'zTy LlrfE I - FINISH STANDARD DRAWING CHAjNIJNIK Frticr- M-06u->c,D I3Y cO123'--:p or- �iCatN� GoHTt�ot- i CHANNEL 1jDTr-,' Ir0fz- pf2f*li Fp.CiE,• `mot [R'rpUt`!Ct PN� GL.�1 -IGE 4jF�FIGAzzno tt� 5m —Mw• OTHER SIDE OF 'THI-.✓ d5t1rr—T. REGIONAL 'TRA'SL city engiaaar r ea. 23889 date 1005 i C4- 14JNLJNK Fr;Y'E l 5uN J-rl -v COY Pmvr/ 4 -ors K ON Mfpej'zTy LlrfE I - FINISH STANDARD DRAWING CHAjNIJNIK Frticr- M-06u->c,D I3Y cO123'--:p or- �iCatN� GoHTt�ot- i CHANNEL 1jDTr-,' Ir0fz- pf2f*li Fp.CiE,• `mot [R'rpUt`!Ct PN� GL.�1 -IGE 4jF�FIGAzzno tt� 5m —Mw• OTHER SIDE OF 'THI-.✓ d5t1rr—T. REGIONAL 'TRA'SL city engiaaar r ea. 23889 date 1005 E DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 1. Verticdl Grade: 0 -5% optimum IDLY maximum for distances over 500' ffl 15% maximum for distances limited to 500' 20% permitted only in extreme cases and for short distances under 10001 2. Cross Section: 3. Drainage: 4. Side Slope Cuts and Fill: 5. Surfacing: 6. Overhead Clearance: 7. Flood and Drainage Channel Crossings: 8. Trail Entrance: 1 -40M optimum 6% maximum in approved locations only Where trail gradient exceeds 4%, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be required. See the City Equestrian Trails and Drainage Standard 813. 2:1 maximum Trail surface shall be native soil, de- composed granite or chopped tree trimmings. Remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. 10 feet E Where Community Trails cross existing or proposed drainage channels, the continuity of the trail shall be maintained by the construction of an appropriate crossing such as bridges, ramp ways, culverts, etc. Trail entrances shall be designed to pro- vide for equestrian., bicycling, and hiking use and discourage motor vehicles access (See Resolution 81 -93), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unob- structed vehicular access for service vehicles. 9. Street Crossings: Crossings shall be at grade witf-, appropriate street striping and sigising. for equestrian use, texturized paving is desirable in order to prevent horses fron slipping. 0 s cite of rancho cucamonga STANDARD DRAWING G,AT r: WSTFj -- E`XTFL7DFA GCiiCRETE hT'X TF<RON6H E.F�E rq gx NL' LI ;01 Mai Ali ILL „!j Iii!.I,;.'E— PPFtKwAY W MAX _ - �� �� —��' GOIiGFG: E PR7YG �� -� (O•. Gi.lfz6 STFE.:T TF�cL'`� 2d G-G• A?PF+aActS IZ' MIN_ rLAN VIEW M,!"{P•L ?LATE �� UL}_ µt4j_y - - - --- — PIPE '(D SLIOE - = --T-- t1YiDP�R 1. -- t '� I STEP THF--UCIH - II -- q; I Z.rn. - 1 ! ipa c-aA.T1= GoNSTsah:-TEV of Zpz °s7AYiDANt >�SrF =t. MEMEM-12S• tljW�=— C4Z�7-ED BY WELZIWC GRx1 MEM?EF -b TO A 3" STi."•I::PARD 4Tc.P1_ P!M wj ts>f� - .;,LSrFF-P oven Z' /t° UFFI.HT. CETAiL: GA"Tr-- ` rrM -,TEP T F,t COMMUNITY TRAM: eur cn9la�sr rea. 2sa8� tat• VEHICLE GATE WITH SIJE ACCESS 1 006 city of rancho Cucamonga I I M". I I � I � Ali � p o • a i� n r e a. 23889 dais GTAN®ARD DRAWING Pt.N: m ramv pbsT'sp TL'l.EPF.7ryE 1'nt.ES SP-T IN =P CTio PlNt`�tl Ft';�Pr-: 1007 city of rancho cucamonga NDTE9 : STANDARD DRAWING �POO aA-r=- EL °-G OS NCi IATGN LATE ,L 4.K W^.L.L INVIH GPAaTw- I. THE GATE Sl -TALL Dr- A 5OLID Wave SELF- Cloro -j To ee^rF,Kc�v5P rY Tim FL^,mt-mmc- Di- .15iotj . Z.MATI;F -IP+LS 4-IiAW- S): WEf�TERf1 REC GEAR. GAR Pf�E"SSLIF£ TFR=A -reV G7 5 SIR. 3.ALL t-I Dt -tA?E SH^:LL. p1= HL-T DIPPEO GALYAfiiZED ¢lE'�i. =• k.= gCaear r.o a. 23889 data w i GATE: commuNRY PARKw" TRAILS ! 1008 city of rancho cucamonga -, Fps oR Tsowur Writ — � `jPNDPRD iRy STy..°L °I��. �,`!DS U.rP'LD F 15-Mil OVEJ� Z "L -=CAD -ne5 !ZrMw.%z- 'Oh" STANDARD DRAWING 1 ! E�IPE i . Lf -tax. IGETAiL IL.4 i<Z. °..s- v�--FD sT6et. rim "3 � "Mlsn_4FPpt: -- AS FeNcE. °GSTS ION A-Al _ 3.4u'TG -PIS t2 y� Fr+ttiw,D TiC�i IPiTS iwf 'L'`iiU '�. 'r STI7. STEEL O1PL �cspP�D NO-7-r". THt6 DPpf! EK MAY E r gSF-D WITH A eaTEE' -- H?Z0Ub -H (<iTD. Mz,.46� I BARRIER WITH STEP -OVER ei-ea9tagr r."_23889 daty 1 009 PRUED TO 8 GounTFl�nratiG .j IZ +� �tPL DRIYEN �` �.;z.rle p�TAtL NO-7-r". THt6 DPpf! EK MAY E r gSF-D WITH A eaTEE' -- H?Z0Ub -H (<iTD. Mz,.46� I BARRIER WITH STEP -OVER ei-ea9tagr r."_23889 daty 1 009 city of rancho cucarnonga STANDARD DRAWING L MET L AL L ME:M0ERS SWAI.L M PF WAST ;-�! CDNGKET� uK�TilCicti' F'�Ln c� -i'icE I I AVA LA Le t'lroM t24A 0 CctVcV.C- 1; { Z.MWMICS SHALL E3,5- rANTeP IN WHITE f F•w�ort� ors.. CorrcF�rE 1 fl' 3.GI�IANGEIN LJhii�.lL DItGT10t� •SiLA!_t- Fl +gjltzl: -.rHo i'�-TS SIM I5Y SIDE - 6. AND PATS Si-fALL KAV. M Ore" t FILLED W mompkm AND TelmilzE ! HN" FF401Z TO - D1 �f ,�i=9NISH C -d��DE s� F<:x 5E%Ti ®N EXTRUDED CONCRETE FENCE: � 1010-, city ..gM..► r o .. 23889 e.e. COMMUNITY TRAIL ° city of rancho cucarnonga STANDARD DRAWING r— — 4 7, 944L6p SYI LL F)E : LlFT'011T tz^iL Fr-9 LOT. IN ,D + F, = z vD Zee GONGiRETE Fo'rIH& W ,%,LL FDE7Ta AHD RA1LS S1�LL aE WEEe�TeF44 ?ED C-EDAiz. Hr,,r Ob�INEi2 O!L DE`rEL�^PE CAM 1NST� —I r �1'I A�TEIZI 't"% SPLIT RAIL FENCE: LOCAL TRAIL 1 011 city saghwar r c. 23064 date , 11 I � Ex�sf. Grnc! - � - I � criif Grnd. -' 6,l SEt'T/ON A -A 0 . r/w PARKWAY RI1AIOAF OEFiECTOR %s0 0 End of ?arkwa✓ Oaflecror to be buffed c bock of curb p r7o . PARKWAY RUAIO.4 F !DEFLECTOR, a� Rc. c. „ 2 �-- a iz'�od. gyp -� Gob c 64 f rvP —'' SECTION A -A COWL_ STREET OVERFLOW OEFLEcroR iQrco bel vice,* edye of Oiivewoy approoch ono Ovcrf /o.✓,orofcrfor to be povev w, {b ter” r?CC. dv,%eior O,?rarr. Qn✓ewoV i Oiiecfrcn o {F /ow Consf- O✓erf?lw Prooi- o /any bock ofsidewo /k or edye of e&hi of Woy- Coate Fcrkwey �� .Punoff G'ef /ccior. TYPICAL PLACEIKENT OF OVERFLOW DEFLECTOR AT STREET /NTERSECT /OA/ If/ /TH SIOEMALKS Curb i uulfer , 1 ♦ Durcfion ofF /ow �\__ :4ofer Corryinq Si /rf' Pave are0 belNCen O ✓Crf /Ow Oef /eet0 /' ondcur6 with 4'P.I.C. aef /erfor ooron. /� Corsf Overj /aw . per Secf.,on A -A R/w �e TYPICAL PLACEMENT OF OVERFLOW DEFLECTOR AT STREET /NTERSECTOO.V W /TJiO✓T S /OEWAL,rS \ Offsef Overf /ow Oef/eefor Z' from Coyle Of approach of Properfy /.nc k4r4 to be buffed oyornsf Fl oaCA _ � bock ofcrib rryp:cof�_ 1 TYPICAL PLACH/iIENT OF CONCRETE STREET OVERFLOW DEFLECTOR ,47- DRIVEWAY QPPROACl- CONCRETE STREET OVERFLOW OEFLEGTOR RESOLUTION NO. 81 -53 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMISSION ESTABLISHiC r1 PLANNING NGSTANDA STANDARDS FOR THE AND DESIGN FEEDER TRAILS MULTI-PURPOSE, TRAILS THE W ITHpNSCCITYNOFv RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to establish standards for the design of trails within the City, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and recommended the Trails Element for approval by the City Council, and; WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to have trails provided along natural physical features where possible. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga ?fanning Commission does hereby establish the following DESIGN STANDARDS FOR TRAILS: SECTION 1: Trail Width: (in feet) Regional Multi- purpose 30' Trails Community _ 20' Trails Local Feeder Trails 15' On Street /Off Street Bike Trails 5% (See Exhibit A) Clearance: 10' overhead with brush and weeds, debris and rocks removed from trail tread. In instances where topography, right -of -way configuration grading or existing vegetation r,„ke it infeasible to construct full width trails as listed above, the City Planner may grant relief and reduce said requirements. Page Z :C SECTION 2: Design P,eouirements: Ca. For equestrian usage the following requirements shall be met: 1. Vertical Grade_: 0 -5% 10% 15% 20% optimum maximum for distances over 500' maximum for distances limited to 500' permitted only in extreme cases and for short distances under 100' 2. Cross Section: 1 -490 optimum 6% maximum in approved locations only 3. Draina e: Avoid erosion by proper grading. Where necessary, use diversionary devices such as water bars and berms. 4. Side Slope Cuts and Fill: 2:1 maximum 5. Surfacing: Native soil, decomposed granite or chopped tree trimmings. Removal of rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. b. For bicycle usage the following requirements shall be met: 1. Vertical Grad,: 0 -5% optimum loo maximum for dist ?aces limited to 200' 2. Cros_ Section: 2% maximum 3. Surfacing: 3" asphaltic concrete or 4" portland concrete cement 4. Design Speed: 11 MPH average, 7 -15 MPH 5. Curvature: 15 MPH maximum SECTION 3: Fencing a. For Regional Multi- Purpose Trails: Along Flood Channels fencing shall consist of a 6' chainlink fence installed by the Flood Control District, Corps of Engineers or the City of Rancho Cucamonga atop the flood control channel wall. The adjacent developer shall be re- sponsible for the installation of a 6' high chainlink fence installer at the joint property line for the ' ^ngth of the co- terminus boundarN Openings shall be made for access a, approved points and for whfre local Feeder Trails and Community Trails intersect. ft 1W Kesu l uc lull Ivu Page 3 SECTION 4: "rail Entrance: Trail entrances shall be designed To provide for equestrian, bicycling and hiking use and discourage mote- vehicle access (See Exhibit B), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unobstructed vehicular access for service vehicles. SECTION 5: Bicycling Trail requirements sha11 be as shown below: r ' b. For Communit Trails: Fencing along street trails (i.e. of 4' -5' high two -rail white B cyc e parkways shall consist Motor venue extruded concrete fence installed along the ultimate al Parked Car right -of -way line for the street, where there are no operating existing block walls; otherwise fencing shall be located Operaang at curb line. Openings shall be provided where Local 51 Feeder Trails or Regional Multi - Purpose Trails intersect. For trails not along streets, no fencing shall be required. C. local Feeder Trails: Fencing shall consist of one rail: I 8' or 10' I 4` high, wood split rail fencing, installed along the co- $' terminus boundary of the easement and the non - easement 10' Or 1 V property of the tract or lot. SECTION 4: "rail Entrance: Trail entrances shall be designed To provide for equestrian, bicycling and hiking use and discourage mote- vehicle access (See Exhibit B), except Local Feeder Trails shall provide one means of unobstructed vehicular access for service vehicles. SECTION 5: Bicycling Trail requirements sha11 be as shown below: r ' I I B cyc e I j Motor venue I . I al Parked Car I operating ! Operaang -+I 51 I 8' or 10' I I I I $' I I I 10' Or 1 V -% I TYPE I SNARED BIKEWAY I I I Bicycle j Motor Vence TYPE 0 SHARED SIKEWAY a I I Operasng 1 Operating -. I U 10' or 11' TYPE III RESTRICTED BIKEWAY 1 jI 8. cIe I Motor venc!e I n I Parked Car m I op aatrtlg Operating U! $ 10. Or it' 8' or 10' i i$ I 1 I I ray, - ,a` .\ a. Shared Bikeways: The shared bikeway has no barrier, either symootic or physical, to delineate the roadway for bicycles. The bikeway is identified by signs posted along the side of the roadway or b� pavement markings painted on the roadway. The outside traffic lane becomes the width reouired for motor vehicle travel, usually 10 or 11 feet, plus the 5 -foot bikeway. Bicyclf -flow is always the same direction as motor - vehicle -flow, since this is much safer. Shared bikaways can he developed in conjunction with pedestrian traffic. However, this practice is discouraged, since pedestrian -flow and bicycle - flow are not very compatible. b. Restricted Bikeway: It is clearly delineated by a barrier and signing. Adequate delineation is an essential re- quirement for the development of a restricted bikeway. Barriers are symbols, such as those made with paint on a pavement. Symbol barriers include striping, full -width coloring and reflectorized raised pavement markers. C. miniumm ut 16=1 is + �. ��. � - •. -_. - _ _ _ The following zriteria shall be consiJered: 1. Average daily traffic (motor vehicle) 2. Bicycle volume 3. Posted speed limit 4. Truck Traffic 5. Adequate right -of -way Safety SECTION 6: Flood and Drainage Charnel Crossings: Where Community Trails cross existing or proposed drainage channels the continuity of the trail shall be maintained by the construction of an appropriate crossing such as bridges, ramp ways, culverts, etc. SECTION 7: Si nin : Signing is required to let the user and the pvbllc know where the trails are. a. Equestrian: O � :�•_; .9'� \.i ` _1 ., �, i 4• �, . �� .. ,,. ,, !. '' y. �, �� � � .. �♦ C.. .. _ .. -/ I C0 r , r r! .`. r I ,t Ar4/,12AIAL Af11L7l- , °Uf2J -05& L L iv t I • jI . - L©C4L F4LQER i� /L l FwL Fps } 4arMW�i�7 RAIL FEWALOM /n.4..ca.. _i "• Fbkl ZLkS: FWLMAD ;1e!k- C- ALVITJmEDAGB Rs ff � j -'jam• �� II 1.44 � VECHICLE BARRIERS DESIGN ALTERNATIVES • V MUM eaub Wo.a •R MC7-A. srro_ay£4 45KW B/T E 0 11 Ce E r441'55 wrt,* Stara ;XXX X xXKKx K�cxK KKYX�r (l4fM N LII� 11 �BOCTat tardcJ.� IL' KteTD� 8►Q �� 14% ►flaw wb2: wG7�, Era iS weayF.o Ta 3�w�nt� W'd Gets ^G r EXW61TC Resolution No. 81 -53 C SECTION 8: Street Crossings: Shall be at air with appropriate street stripping and signing. In cases n{ strian usage, texturized paving is desirable. SECTION 9: kaisers: The Planning Com...ission may grant a waiver from the requirements of this Resolution except Section 1 when: (a) The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result ir. practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Resolution. (b) There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the pro)erty involved that do not apply generally to other pro;serties. (c) ...e strict or lit--ral interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. (d) The granting of the waiver will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the l;rritations on other propert':es classified in the sane zone. (e) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Any request for waiver shall be presented in writing and be made as pa rt of the development application for the project which involves the trail. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 1981. PLANNING rONIMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: 'Richard Dahl, Chairman � - J ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission C® 4 Resolution No. 81 -53 Page 8 C 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Cowission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cartiry that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONEPS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, King, Tolstoy, Dahl Ncne Sceranka ♦r 1 >. 0 r I • .y. y ' c e 11 Lt [.1 { RESOLUTION NO. 81 -53A A RESOLUTION OF TFE PLANNING COMNtISSION AMENDING RESOLUTION 81 -53, ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE DESIGN OF REGIONAL MULTI - PURPOSE, COMMU%M, AND LOCAL FEEDER TRAILS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to establish standards for the design of trails within the City; ana WHEREAS, the City has adopted a Trails Element as a part of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Caranission has reviTwed the standards called the "Equestrian Traii Guidelines ", and has found that these standards are the minimum necessary to implement the intent and purpose of the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby: 1. Pnends Resolution 81 -53 by adopting the standards, called the Equestrian Trail Guidelines for regional multi- purpose, community, and local feeder trails; and 2. That the Equestrian Trail Guidelines, shall supersede those standards for equestrian trails previously adoptad as part of Resolution 81 -53; and 3. Recommends to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that Council Resolution No. 81 -93 be amended to adopt the Equestrian Trail G:iideiines. 4. The Equestrian Trail Guidelines shall be included in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Standard Drawings booklet, starting with the number 1001. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF 'FHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Herman Rempel, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission 11 Resolution No. Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Pla ^ring Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Jo hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Ra:fchc Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the Sth day of June, 1933, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS• ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: c E 40 I] E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE. June 8, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: PROPOSED PESIDENTIAL PARKING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT BACKGROUND: Based upon Planning Commission direction, staff has prepared the attached ordinance which amends the residential pal-King requirements of the Interim Zoning Ordinance. It is intended that the Ordinance be reviewed and discussed by the Commission tonight and that any further direction would be provided to staff for incorporation into the draft Ordinance. A public hearing will be heard before the Planning Commission on June 22, 1983. Staff has given copies of the proposal to the Building Industry Association as well as several developers which previously requested the City to review its current standards. ANALYSIS: The current parking regulations for residential uses asrca y establishes regulations for two types of residential development: (1) single family dwellings; and, (2) multiple family dwellings. The current code does not differentiate between patio homes, duplexes, or zero lot line developments. The code simply requires two parking spaces in a garage or, carport for a single family dwelling and 2.2 spaces per dwelling unit kone in a garage or carport and all others open) for multiple family dwellings. In review of +-e types of development which are being proposed throughout the City, staff has categorized residential needs into three major classifications: (1) conventional single family; (2) clustered dwellings and semi-detached single family; and, (3) apartments. Within each of these categories, staff has proposed the number of autos required to be in direct relationship to the number of bedrooms. The basis of the actual numbers proposed is from a recent parking study conducted by Barton- Aschman Associates, Incorporated, Traffic Engineers. This firm conducted a comprehensive parking study for the City of Irvine which included a detailed survey of apartment, condcrinium, and single family residential residents. Based upon the survey information received through this study, the number of spaces proposed are in direct relationship with the actual need of each unit type. ITEM K Proposed Residential Parking Ordinance Amendment Planning Commission Agenda ,iune 8, 13$3 Page 2 The proposal which staff has developed closely follows the recommendations of the parking survey. The requirement for conventional single family dwellings is proposed to remain the same (2 parking spices per unit within a garage or carport). For clustered developmei:t, semi - detached single family, and mobile home parks, the requiremen's have been broken down into studio units , one bedroom units, two or mire bedrooms. The major difference between staff's proposal and the consultant's recommendation is with regard to guest parking. The consultant's report recommended that in addition to the base requirements, :ne additioral guest parking space would be provided fc- each unit. Based upon the survey results, staff found no substanti•-- information to require that high of a ratio of visitor parking spaces. Therefore, staff proposes that only one guest parking space shall be provided for every four units. This is different from our current regulation which requires one space for every five units. We have found a higher need for visitor parking within multiple ft idly ly or clustered developments because of the lack of on- street parking. For apartments, the number of parkarg spaces for each category of bedrooms is slightly less than what is being proposed for the clustered development category. Additionally, the requirement for guest parkin -b is proposed at one guest parking space for each four unit rather thin one for each five units which the code currently requires. In addition to the changes for required spaces, this proposal also includes a provision to allow up to 50% of the required uncovered spaces to be of compact car size. Survey results from the Irvine survey_ e= well as surveys conducted within the automobile manufacturing industry, indicates approximately 65% of the automobiles on the road or being manufactured are considered compact car size. Following are two tables: (1) showing current regulations and proposed regulations and (2) showing a comparison on a 200 unit project between current regulations and proposed regulations. 11 11 E E M P A R I S 0 N. i A 8 L r SING TYPE I CURI.ENT CODE I PROPOS_9 CODE Comvntionai Single Family � 2 covered spaces � 2 cove 'ed spaces Cluster Development (condos and townhomes), semi - detached single family (zero lot line, Patio homes, duplexes) and =bile home Parks. j2 spaces. L 1 covered space (a) studio I 1.5 sbdccs: i coverer (b) 1 bedroom �1 which ) its covered 2 spaC, l covered (c) 2 or more bedrooms 1 sp.r_.•rvery 4 du. (tl) visitor parking Ilpace /every 5 ]u. _ (e) compact car allowance far i 20'0 of the ur•coveretl 501 a, the uncovered ,^+covered spaces ( Apartments ;-- spaces, f 1.3 spaces: 1 covered _ (a) bachelor and 1 b�drox.. I12 i.- 1.6 spaces: 1 covered 1 (b) 2 bedro om i 1 � �1 whim 5 covered 1.7 Spaces : 1 covered (c) 3 bedroom ng r �1 ;Pace /every 5 du. � 1 space /every 4 du. rk (C) visitor parkins (e) Compact car al',., once for 201 of unco ^erect ' 501 uncovered uncovered spaces. E CF JEL0PMENT EXAMPLE TABLE II 1 HOGS :NG TYPE I CURRENT CODE PROPOSED C..E 1. 2C0 condominiums os (a) 50 1- bedrom 1400 spaces: 75 spaces: SC cover^C I 200 to be 200 sP� =��: �� covered (b) 1W 2- bedrooms ' covered 100 spaces: 50 covered (c) 50 3- bedrooms �--- -- (d) visitor Spaces �0 spaces x spaces TOTAL 440 ! 425 apartrsnts 50 i- bedrooms Fa spaces: 65 spaces: 50 covered 100 2- bedrooms �430 Z00 to be 16,7 spaces: 100 Govern 1 (c) 50 3- xCrornas covered 25 spaces. 50 covered (d) visitor parking 40 spaces 50 spaces TOTAL 440 ( 360 RECMENDATION: the proposal, Land receive any Public with regard to any desired changes or provide direction to staff bring back the final proposal to the Planning additions. Staff will for hearing on June 22. 1983. Commission public Re4F °c #u l l y"submi tted , 1. t �.i Rick mez City Planner• RG:MV:-ir ( ORDINANCE NO. 1238 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.0219(b)(7) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE N0. 123, RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARDS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 61.0219(b)(7) of the Rancho Cucamonga Interim Zoning Ordina�i' hareby amended to read as follows: (7) Residential Uses: (A) Single - family dwellings (conventional). Two (2) perking spaces within a garage or carport. (B) Cluster development (condominium, t —home, etc.) semi- dexached single family (zero lot line, patio homes, duplexes, etc.) and mobile home parks: ( ;) Studio: One (1) off - street parking space ner unit in a garage or carport. 40 (II) One (i) bedroom: 1.5 off - street parking spaces per unit of which one space shall be in a garage or carport. ( ; ;y) Two (2), three (3) or more bedrooms: Two off- street parking spaces per unit of which one sp ?ce shall be in a garage or carport. ( ;v) In addition to the required number of parking snaces for Each unit, one off - street uncovered paring space shall be provided for each four units for visitor parking. (v) For developments containing five or more units, up to fifty percent of the required uncovered spaces may be compact car size. r 1 4; `J d .' Ordinance No. Page 2 E (C) Apartments: (I) Bachelor and one bedroom dwelling unit: 1.3 off- street parking spaces for each dwelling unit of which one space shall be in a garage or carport for each unit. (IT) Two (2; bedroom dwelling units: 1.6 off - street parking spaces for each dwelling unit of which one space shall be covered for each unit. (III) Three (3) bedrooms or more dwelling units: 1.7 off - street parking spaces for each dwelling unit of which one space shall be covered for each unit, plus 0.2 off- street parking space for each bedroom in excess eF three (3). (IV) In addition to required number of parking spaces for each unit, one (1) guest parking space shall be required for each four (4) units. (V) For building sites containing five (5) or more dwelling units, uD to fifty (50) percent of the required parking spaces uncovered may be of compact car size.. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby finds that this amendment will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment and issues a Negative Declaration for this A.nendment. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) d.vs after its passage at least once in Tt.e Daily Report, a newspaper of general c?rcuiation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City ci Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19*. AYES: NOES: fb ABSENT: