HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983/07/27 - Agenda Packet ...
.OL
�r
CITY-nF
y RANCHO CUJCAMON+GA
PLANNING COMMISSION
O - A
J > AGE V 1&
1977 WEDNESDAY July 27, 1983 7:00 P.M.
L_ON'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
9161 BASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
A C T I 0 .4 L Pledge of Allegiance
IL Roll Call.
Commissioner Barker X Commissioner Rempel X
Commissioner Juarez X Commissioner Stout X
Commissioner McNielx
III. A-siouneements
Iv. Committee Assignments
V. Approval of Minutes
APPROVED 4-0-1 June 22, 1983
APPR VED AS AMENDED July 13, 1983
44�—
VL Consent Calendar
The fo�lowin7 Consent Calendar items are expected to be
routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by
the Co=aission at one time without discussion. If anyone
has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion.
APPROVED 5-0 A. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 5697 - WESTMONT
With removal of Item PROPERTUES - Located north of 4th Street at Santa Anita.
E, which is wto ith be B. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAPS 7061-2 AND 7061-3
resubmitted with development plans. - KACOR - Located on the South side ox 6th Street between
Cleveland and Milliken Avenues.
C. TRACT 11013 - LEWIS - Reapplication for design review of
30 single family homes on 10 acres of land in the R-1-10,000
zone located at the southeast corner of Banyan and
Amethyst - APN 1062-401-10.
+.r.+ras nnnrcum
~. D. ENVIKUI` C"14'1`AL AzibrIbb1ViLPl l ivn ,,,,,.........
REVIEW 83:5 - JASI{A - The development of a 21,010
square ooi industrial building on 1.45 acres of land within
the Scheu Industrial Park in the General IndustriaVRail
K; Served category (Subarea 5), located on the east side of
Ardu'bald Avenue, north of 6th Street- APN 209-211-21.
Planning Commission Agenda
July 27 , 1983
Page 2 `
REMOVED - - - - - - - - E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA NEIGHBORH OD CENTER - A .7 Acre
parcel of land south of and adjacent to the existing Rancho
Cucamonga Neighborhood Center located at 9791 Arrow
Highway.
F. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11932 - EJL- A
custom lot subdivision of 2.7 accres To land into 10 lots v1 the
R-1 zone, located on the north side of Finch Avenuer west
of Haven Avenue - APN 202-191-15.
VIL Public Hearings
The following it are public hearings on which concerned
individuals may voice their opinion of the related project.
Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the
Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinicn_
shall be limit--d to 5 minutes per individual for each project.
APPROVED 5-0 G. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT 11626 - SIEVERS - Revi w and
consideration of a tot-used Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) prepared for a custom lot residential subaivision of 82
lots on 86.53 acres of land located on the north side of
Almond Street at Beryl Street - APN 1061-411-03;
1061-451-01; 1061-171-01.
APPROVED 5-0 H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT
with Comni ssi on to review 11626 - SIEVERS - A custom lot residential subdivision of 82
canycn stabel i zi ng lots on 86.53 acres of land in the R-1-20,000 zone located on
devices. the north side of Almond Street at Beryl Street - APN
1061-411-03; 1061-451-01; 1061-171-01.
APPROVED 5-0 L VARIANCE 83-03 - BRIMAR DEVELOPMENT
ti CORPORATION - A request to reduce the required-
minimum lot width and square footage in order to subdivide
a 1.02 acre parcel in the R-1-20,000 zone located on the
south side of Bella Vista, west of Carnelian - APN
1061-221-21.
APPROVED 5-0 with J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP
addition of trails 8611 - BRIMAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A
requirement. division o in 1.02 acres into 2 parcels with the R-1-20,000
zone loeatea on the south side of Bella Vista, west of
l�W. .nw7ien _ ADM I=1-991-91.
0"i
ia„ .,
Planning Commission Agenda
July 27 , 1983
Page 3
APPROVED 5-0 K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8007
with recommendation - MANE - A division o 1.7.8 acres into 4 parcels within the
to City Council to R-1-2Q,000 zone located on the west side of Hermosa
waive street improve- Avanue between Wilson and Hiils;1^ - APN 201-083-04.
ments. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7966
APPROVED 5-011 :ill ASSOCIATION - A division of 97.5
acres u to 1 parcel located on the south side of Miller
Avenue between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria
Loop within the Victoria Planned Community zoned for
Regional Commercial - APN 227-161-27, 29, 30, 32;
227-171-091, 17; 227-201-34; 227-211-2, 21.
APPROVED 5-0 M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-10 - PRESSLEY - A change
0 ownership or an arcade ormerly JJ's Arcade Tin the C-1
zone to be located at 6642 and 6646 Carnelian in the Rancho
Plaza Shopping Center.
APPROVED CONDITIONAL N. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-11 - DATA DESIGN - The
E PERMIT FOR 6 MONTHS temporary placement of Iwo 2 1440 sq. t. o floe trailers
5-0 with condition that on 1.8 acres of land in conjunction with an e= ing
manufacturing facility in the M-R-T (Restricted
application for Improvement
Manufacturing) zone located at 7925 Center Avenue - APN
Agreement extension be
1077-401-08.
applied for prior to
occupancy. VHL Diteeturls Reports
0. DEVELOPMElff CODE O• DEVELOPMENT CODE
eview Schedule: 1& Public Comments
Aug. 16, Sept_ 6,
Sept. 20, Oct. 4, This is the time and place for the general public to address
Oct. 12. All the Commission.. Items to be discussed here are those which
meetings to begin do not already appear on this agenda.
a 6:00 p.m.
Commission selected
S- Adpx¢nment - 10:10 P.M.
August 30, 1983 The planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations
as review date that set an II p.m. adjournment time- if items go beyond that
for Foothills time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission.
Community Plan.
:r
:c
.a}
4Y
T
VICINITY MAP
AF
•
i
•
` COI L.GC • .
t •nwr Mfg :� ._::.� Su.mA
• • rr 1 f
19T t
— O
• t •
11 t • •
tYr UM• f+� � 2 • • •
LIOM PAZ
saea.• � • • rd•i
Anf• �
j
f
m -
{{
a 1 Aa • � V
_S
CUCAY GA-QUA9ff cnU.f. CCmonu M.A CnUMf. •EclO•a MI:•�
pYiAIIQ lNfF•LTIO•At AM•O•T
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAW*Wn•A
�_ir
� 1 Y
J
C�CA,yp�,
�° c9 crr.x Cis
' y Rli- P•I.M CUCAIVYO:'�GA
;1A NNiNG CONI LMiSSiONT
Z AGENDA.F Zi
v 1977 .DH'EDNB5DAY July 27, 1983 7:00 P.M.
LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
9161 BASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
L Pledge of Allegiance
TL Roll Cell
Commissioner Rempe;
Commissioner Barker _ Commissioner Stout
Commissioner Juarez
Commissioner McNiei
IQ. Announcements
IV. Committee Assignments
V. Approval of y1inutes
June 22, 1983
July 132 1983
VL Ca>sent Calendar
The following consent Calendar items are expected to be
routine and non-controversial_ They will be ac'_ed on by
the comaission :at one time without discussion. If anyone
has concern over any item, it should be rermved for discussion.
TMONT �r
A. nj EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 5697 - WES
PROPERTIES - Located north o 4tr+ Sweet at Santa Anita.
B. TIMECEXTENSION—JU �cated on the south side Po 6th Street between
Cleveland and Milliken Avenues.
C. TRACT 11013 - LEW-IS - Reapplication for design review of
30 single amity homes on 10 acre` of land in the R-1-10,000
=s]. zone located at the southeast corner of Banyan and
Amethyst- APN 1062-401-10.
DEVELOPMENT
Eh�'iRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOP.
D. - The development of a 21,010
REVIEW 83-15 - JASKA on 1.45 acres of land within
square oot Industrial builduig
the Scheu Industrial Perk in the General Industr sides
Of
N�P Served category (Subarea 5), located on the east
Archald Aven�:e, north of Rh Street- APN 209-211-
ib
h _
Planning Conrnission Agenda
July 27 , 1983
Page 2
E. EI;%gRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND NEGATIVE
DE-WULATION FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE RANCHO
CT=Z- 1: NGA NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER - A .7 Acre
parcel of land south of and adjacent to the existing Rancho
Cucamonga Neighborhood Center located at 9791 Arrow
Highway.
F. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11932 - EJL- A
custom lot subdivision o 2.7 acres o land into 10 lots in the
R-1 zone, located on the north side of Finch Avenue, west
of Haven Avenue - APN 202-191-15.
YEL Public Hearins
The following items are public hearings on which concerned
individuals may voice their opinion of the related project.
Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the
Co=nxssion by stating your name and address. Al2 such cpinions
shall be Zi.-aited to 5 minutes per individual far each project.
G. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT 11626 - SIEVERS - Rev4?w and
consideration ot a focused Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) prepared for a custom lot residential subdivision of 82
lots on 86.53 acres of land located on the north side of
Almond Street at Beryl Street - APN 1061-411-03;
1061-451-01; 1061-171-01.
h. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN'_` &ND TENTATIVE TRACT
11626 - SIEVERS - A custom lot residential subdivision of 82
lots on 86.53 acres of land fti the R-1-20,000 zone located on
the north side of Almond Street at Beryl Street - APN
1061-411-03; 1061-451-01; 1061-171-01.
L VARIANCE 83-03 - BRIMAR DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION - A request to reduce the required
mtntmum lot width and square footage in order to subdivide
a 1.02 acre parcel in the R-1-20,000 zone located on the
south side of Bella Vista, west of Carnelian - APN
1061-221-21.
J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP
8011 - BRI1AAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A
division of 1.02 acres into 2 parcels within the R-1-20,000
zone located on the south side of Bella Vista, west of
Carnelian- AlIN 1061-221-21.
Planning Commission Agenda
July 27 , 1993
Page 3
K. HN nRONIAENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8037
BL?4NE - A divisivit o 17.3 acres i.nta 4 parcels within the
1-1-2%009 zone located on the west side of Hermosa
Avenue between Wilson and Hillside - APN 201-083-04.
L. ENVMONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7966
HAHN F00r-r L ASSOCIATION - A division of 57.5
aeres into 1 parcel located on the south side of Miller
Avenue between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria
Loop within the Victoria Planned Community zoned
Regional Commercial - APN 227-161-279 29, 30, 32;
227-171-09, 17; 227-201-34; 227-211-2, 21.
M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-10 - PRESSLEY - A change
0 ownership or an arcade ormeriy JJ's Arcade in the C-1
zone to be located at 6642 and 6646 Carnelian in the Rancho
Plaza Shopping Center.
N. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-11 - DATA DESIGN - The
temporary placement of Ywo �2 1440 sq. ft. office trailers
on 1.8 acres of land in conjunction with an existing
manufacturing facility in the M-R T (Restricted
Manufacturing) zone located at 7925 Center Avenue - APN
1077-401-08.
VUL Director's Reports
O. DEVELOPMENT CODE
UL Public comments
This is the Lime and place for the general public to address
the co=zassion. Items to be discussed here are those which
do not already appear on this agenda.
g. Adjournment
The Planning co=ni.ssion has adopted Administrative Regulations
iy that set an 11 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond that
time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission.
�i�
lfv,'R%IIT"Y MAP
• , v
I e
N
W..•. � 4M..l.NS>IOIttLMNtj
• CN/lift
COLLEGE ,
♦ Owr. .wl.^ l • Svw•n1
r max 0 — r`
• r
t
u E I i 7
ij IL ION /.RN CITYa MRLL � • f • l•
.N.M•
10001i ' • � L�
Yew
�.,L•ro S f
[UC.YOYGR•6YRSTI CQUMi• RLOION.L /1Rf
ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL •IN.O•r
C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMON"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a r0cnr4n�c
MEMORANDUM
19
yll �
O
a
i July 27, 1983
DATE: 1977,
10: Chairman and Members of th Pl ning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner t SUBJECT: COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS F0A 143-84
As a reminder, Committee assignments for the upcoming year will be made
at the Commission's July 27 meeting. The functions of the Citizens
Advisory, Street Naming, Zoning, and Flood Control Committees have been
completed, therefore staff recommends that these Committees be
desolved. The following are the Committees requiring appointments:
Design Review Committee:
o Meets twice a month, Tuesdays 4:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m.
o Requires two Commission members plus one alternate
Equestrian/Trails Committee
o Meets once a month, Wednesdays 12:15 p.m.
o Requires one Commission member plus one alternate
Should you have any questions or comments regarding these Committees,
please feel free to call at any time.
RG:jr
'r
July 26, 1983
Richard Dahl
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Crimm:ssion
9340 Baseline Road, Unit B
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: API-4 1077-401-09
Dear Nor. Dahl:
t of two ternporary office trailers at the Data Design
We are opposed to the placemen
faci'_:ty located at 7925 Center Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga.
At present Center Avenue is unable to handle the vehicles entering and exiting from the
Data Design plant during rush hour periods.
Curbs and gutters are not constructed on the Data Design side of Center Avenue
making the street extremely narrow at this point. This, in addition to the chain link
Design facility, make it impossible for vehicles leaving the
fence surrounding the Data
As a result, we have had many close calls coming into
plant to see on- coming traffic.
and leaving our neighborhood.
We feel that Data Design should be requ'_red to widen Center Avenue by constructing
rrentcurbs and gutters or. its portion and that it conform to cthe s'cdelwalk arerdustriaa zoning
requirements by removing the chain link fence and landscaping
This we feel would lessen the current and dangerous traffic situation and would aid in
dustrial facility adjoining a residential area.
reducing the impact of this in
Sincerely,
Jim and Sandy Miller C `^ � � � �
10265 Ashford Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ED
G�.NF�N DEMO OPMEdT�DEPG7�
714/980-1753
JUL 27 1383
PU
� 191%U11211121314 e6
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING CCMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
July 13, 1983
C LL TO ORDER
Chairman Rempel called the regular meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission to order at 7 p.m. The meeting was held at the Lion Park
Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman
Rempel then led in the pledge of allegiance.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: David Barker, Addie Juarez, Dennis Stout,
Herman Rempel
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Larry McNiel
STAFF PRESENT: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner; Rick Gomez, City Planner;
Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Lloyd Hubbs,
City Engineer; Joan Kruse, Administrative Secretary,
Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Chairman Rempel stated that it has been a pleasure to serve as chairman for
this Commission_ and by acclamation nominated Dennis Stout as chairman for the
1983-84 term.
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Juarez, carried unanimously, to elect
Dennis Stout as chairman.
Dennis Stout nominated Dave Barker for the position of vice-chairman.
Motion: Moved by Hempel, seconded by Juarez, carried unanimously, that Dave
Barker would serve as vice-chairman for the next year.
Chairman Rempel asked that he chair this final meeting of his term.
There was unanimous agreement that he do so.
CONSENT CALDENDAR
Commissioner Barker requested that Item A be removed from the Consent Calendar
for discussion.
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to approve
Items B and C of the Consent Calendar.
B. TIME EXTENSION FOR DR 81-38 - VISTA INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
C. TENTATIVE TRACT 11696 - VANGUARD VENTURES - Single family residential
development of six dwellings on six previously recorded parcels, located
on Garder. Court, near Sapphire.
Commissioner Barker stated that on page two of Resolution No. 81-26 there is a
provision requiring the installation of a portion of the Deer Creek regional
trail. ze iaaicated that he was not concerned about the project but of the
regional trail system and asked if future developers will be rr-,._ '-4d to pay
support of some kind for a regional trail system, or if thel how that
cost would be incurred.
Mr. Gomez replied that the Corps :-�xgineers, along with the CL,-..6y and the
City, will be making the impr..c,a- along that regional trail, and along
this channel it will not be ;csa1! : g that this developer will have to do.
Commissioner Stout asked when this 24-act was approved was it the City's
intention not to extend Victoria the Deer Creek area.
Mr. Rougeau, Senior ,ivil. Er,3',neer, r_plied that no crossing was proposed.
Chairman Rempel state._ way c,' farther explanation, Victoria was not
carried to the chan-e a: '.1icttvl.a side and there is no .oy it can be
continued.
Motion: Moved by Sto,ij, , eco-^?d oy .7::arez, carried unanimously, to adopt
Item A of the Consen• G+lend
A. TIME EXTENSIOM -'+)R '":.tiT:'_" +:r TRACT 1160E _ wESTEND INVESTMENTS - Located
on the north s4_6c of th Pacific Railroad right-of-way, between
:ttven Avenue and Ds.-- .reek.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12402 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY - A total residential development of 152 condominium units on 5
lots comprising 7.9 acres of land generally located at the northeast
corner of Spruce Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway - APN 1077-091-01 and 02.
Associate Planner, Dan Coleman reviewed the staff re,;)ort.
Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing.
Kay Matlock, representing Lewis Development Company, stated that they are
familiar with the conditions of approval and they are acceptable. There being
no further comment the public hearing was closed.
Planning Commission Minutes -2- July 13, 1983
r`
Commissioner Stout stated that at the Design Review level it had been asked
that the developer change the windows on the elevations.
Mr. Coleman replied that this request has been taken care of under condition
one of section two of the resolution in that it requires horizontal masonite
siding to be used on the windows.
Mr. Coleman stated that as a result of the Grading Committee meeting, the
applicant must provide a minimum one percent slope for the graded area instead
of two percent.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt
q Resolution 83-86 approving Tentative Tract 12402 and issuing a negative
declaration.
� • f a e
E. ENVIRONME6TAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83-10 - VIANA - The
development of two manufacturing warehouse buildings of 32,400 square feet
and 35,530 square feet on 3.02 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy
Ind=,trial zone (Subarea 4) , located at the southeast corner of 8th Street
and Rochester Avenue - APN 220-27-27 and 28.
Dan Coleman, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report.
Coleman how the screen inside the door would
Commissioner Barker asked Mr.
work.
' Mr. Coleman replied that it is a decorative metahsa ornwouldh would be
beunable to see
painted black. Further, that a person passing the
^, anythirg from any angle behind it.
Commissioner Barker asked if you would still be able to set it up for security
reasons.
Mr. Coleman replied that you can.
Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant wished to
add anything to this.
Mr. Jay Viara, the applicant, questioned the need for a median island for this
project.
Mr. Rougeau replied that a requirement for an island was inadvertently checked
but that Rochester Avenue does not call for a median island.
There being no further comments the public hearing was closed.
July 13, 1983
Plaing Commission Minutes -3-
.-m
Chairman Rempel thanked the applicant for working with tht Design Review
Committee in providing for screening of the doors.
Commissioner Barker echoed Chairman Rempel`s comments.
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to ciopt
Resolution No. 83-87 a;oroving Development Review 83-10 and issuing a negative
declaration.
f f i i i
�NVZPO*LM`hTAL ASSESShENT AIM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83-13 - J.E. SUTLER - A
?lanned Development of 230 apartment units on 9.6 acres in the R 3 (Multi-
Family REsidentiai) zone located on the south side of Foothill, east of
Vineyard.
City Planner, Rick Gomez, reviewed the staff report. He indicated that there
woula be some changes made to the standard conditions and stated that Item 11
under landscaping should be filled in to indicate Foothill Boulevard.
Paul Rougeau stated that on page 5 of Enoineering a change,toonditionLtion u of
L4, M3, and 02 would be changed. He also suggested
the Resolution to read that a drainage easement or acceptance shall be
obtained by the applicant for the purpose of surface drainage or the
installation of a storm drain as deemed necessary by the City Engineer.
Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing.
1A-. Bob Skinner, representing the applicant, stated that the only request he
would make is for the secondary ingress and egress on the corner of the
property. Mr. Skinner indicated that the Fire District has determined that
there should be no ingress and egress from that driveway. He did not
understand the reason and felt that they should be allowed right turns only
from that driveway. further, it would allow smoother use of that driveway
during peak times.
Commissioner Barker asked if that stipulation had been put in by the Fire
District.
1.b•. ro•_geau replied that he is not iass3'�^ with the requirement. further,
the fire department would require a secondary access for emergency use only.
He indicated that with many projects they will use a driveway for emergency
use only and that has been acceptable.
Mr. Fb•ugeau etated that the applicant wants to have the senondary driveway
opened to all tenants.
Mr. Gomez stated that has been a part of the design review and the fire
district is closing it for only emergency use.
Planning Commission Minutes -4- July 13, 1983
Chairman Rempei stated th2t if this project were not in the area it is in, he
F wo+old be in favor of allowing use of the secondary driveway. He indicated
is across from the
that the problem is that it GemCO secondary access.
Gemco again they would have eliminated
Further; if the Commission looked at
the secondary access. aiairman Rempel stated that the applicant might say it
will be used for right turns only but there is no way to stop left turns and
k until that particular intersection is signalized, there is going to be a big
problem.
Mr. Rougeau stated that before long there will be a left turn phase on the
signal.
•, Skinner asked if they would be able to reapply for use of the driveway at
the time the median strip is put in the road.
Mr. Rougeau replied that that possibility would exist.
Commissioner Stout stated that he agreed with Chairman Rempel's comments
relative to the driveway being so close to the traffic light. He indicated
that there would be a tendency to have a major intersection He furt point and
her stated
that people watch the light and not the driveway close by.
that he would see that as a major problem.
F,L-. Gomez stated that under landseapi,zg condition four, this was discussed
be checked for a 50 tr
with Mr. Butler and it should
minimum per gross acre.
Chairman Rempel stated that he does not have a problem with 50 trees but with
the requirement for box size trees or specimen size trees. He felt that this
r, should be left to the discretion of staff because some trees do better if they
are smaller.
There being no further comments the public hearing wss closed and it was moved
by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No.
83-88 approving Development Review 83-13 and issuing a negative declaration
with the amendments to the Resolution and standard conditions as noted.
w DT-RECTOR'S REPORTS
G. REVTEFI AHD APPRQVAL OF 1983-84 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - Community
improvements and long-range major street and drainage Fro—gram priorities.
City Engineer, Lloyd Hibbs, reviewed
the staff
oca ereport.
He stated that 00 targeted fora lot
will be done with the federal prograr, to
Archibald. Fie indicated that it put a big dent in the 5-year program and
offers an opportunity to evaluate the long-range plan. Further, that the City
will be able to do some reconstruction of residential streets this year, as
many tracts are getting to be 20-25 years old and are in need of care•
- Planning Commission Minutes -5-
,lzsly 13, 1983
y..
Motion: Moved ty Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 83-89 approving the 1983-84 Capital Improvement Program for the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Mr. Dave Flocker asked if there will be any traffic control at East and
Victoria in the vicinity of the Etiwanda High School and also East Avenue
north of Highland.
Mr. iLbbs replied that there will be a project this year east on Highland.
Further that they will study the need for a signal and will be monitoring
traffic rear the high school.
Commissioner Stout felt there may be a need for a four-way stop.
Mr. Rougeau stated that there are so many warning devices that they might
employ that they should not need a four-way stop.
Chairman Rempel stated that with so many students driving to school they
should start before the school is occupied.
h. REVIEW OF PROPOSED FLOOD HAZARD MAPS - In conjunction with National Flood
Insurance Program
City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs, reviewed the staff report.
Commissioner Stout asked if the Day Creek channel is constructed will large
blue areas shown on the map go away.
Mr. Hubbs replied yes, that it will, and that the City will be going through a
lot of expense to protect from Day Creek.
Commissioner Stout asked if the City pays some type of insurance premium to
the federal government for this program.
Mr. Hobbs explained that the City does not pay a premium but property owners
have available to 'them flood insurance through their regular insurance age_it
which is subsidized by the federal government.
I. SET REVIEW DATE FOR SAN BERNARDINO COCNTY'S WEST VALLEY FOOTHILLS
COMMUNITY PLAN - Oral presentation - information packets will be available
at the meeting.
Rick Gomez, City Planner reviewed the report given to the Commissioners at the
meeting. He stated that the County planners intend to go before their
Planning Commission and to the Board of Supervisors.
Chairman Rempel suggested that the City's Planning Commission meet on the 16tn
of August to review this plan; however, if the regular Planning Commission
meeting of August 24 is light, that it be looked at at that time.
Planning Commission Minutes -6- July 13, 1983
Mr, Gomez replied that the determination of meeting c. .s will be made at the
first meeting in Augast at which time they could adjourn• to that meeting.
Commissioner Stout stated that with respect to the tentative schedule there
will be a meeting between the staff and the County and asked if the
recommendations made at the previous meetings will be addressed at this time.
Mr. Gomez stated that he will take the Commission's concerns and input and let
them kno,r what action the County has taken, whether positive or negative.
Chairman Rempei asked that something be prepared for review prior to the
meeting on the issue.
Chairman Rempel stated that before he adjourns the meeting he wished to thank
the Planning Commission and staff for all the :yelp they provided to him during
the past six months. He then turned the gavel over to Chairman Stout.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel., carried unanimously, to adjourn.
7:59 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned.
6espectfully submitted ,
r
JACK LAM, Secretary
r,
Planning Commission Minutes -7- July 13, 1983
A
f
l
I
4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
June 22, 1983
Chairman Herman Rempel called the Regular Meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission to order at 7:02. Chairman Rempel then led in the pledge
of allegiance.
RILL CALL
PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: David Barker, ARdempelie Juarez, Larry
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Dennis Stout
STAFF PRESENT: Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Curt Johnston,
Assistant Planner; Janice Reynolds, Secretary; Paul
Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer; and Michael Vairin, Senior
Planner
ANNOUN�TS
Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, presented a memorandum tr the Commissioners
which discussed a preliminary project proposed by K & B .)evelopment Company.
Mr. Vairin suggested that it might be helpful for the Commission to tour the K
& B project in Ponona prior to their review of the proposal .
Mr. Vairin also announced that election of Planning Commission officers would
take place at the Commission's June 8 meeting.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Barker requested an amendment to page 4 of the May 25, 1983
Minutes to read ". . there had been a large number of concerns by staff
regarding these projects" rather than ". there were a large number of
concerns . . .".
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to approve
the Minutes of the May 25, 1983 Planning Commission meeting as amended.
Commissioner Barker requested that a statement be added to the Minutes of
June 8, 1983 to clarify the discussion regarding the trail system on the
southwest corner of the project and the width requirement of 10-feet of
asphalt and 10-feet of trail.
Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, advised that Robert Dougherty is the
City Attorney, not the Ass°stant City Attorney as indicated under the staff
present section of the June 8, 1983 Minutes.
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to approve
the Minutes of the June 8, 1983 Planning Commission meeting as amended.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 83-04 -
RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARDS - An ordinance amending Section
. 2 9(b) ( , Residential Parking Standards, of the Rancho Cucamonga
Interim Zoning Ordinance.
Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the st-aff report.
Commissioner Barker suggested that future changes in ordinances be presented
in a strike through and underline method which would facilitate the
Commission's review.
Michael Vairin clarified that the present ordinance is divided into single
family and multiple family. The single family requires two covered spaces and
the multiple family requirement is one space within a garage or carport and
one uncovered space plus one visitor space for every five units. This
proposal differs in the number of spaces is determined on the number of
bedrooms and increases the visitor parking to one per four units.
Chairman Rempel opened the public hearino.
Kay Matlock, Lewis Homes, addressed the Commission expressing her appreciation
for the opportunity to work with staff on the drafting of this ordinance and
felt that staff had come up with a reasonable approach.
There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed.
Chairman Rempel stated that the sentence in Section V under apartments
regarding the uncovered parking spaces was rather awkward and should be
reworded.
Mr. Vairir advised that the sentence would be reworded.
Planning Commission Minutes -2- June 22, 1983
Motion: Moved by Juarez, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried, to adopt
Resolution 83-82 recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and Zoning
Ordinance Amendment 83-04 and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City
Council .
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: JUAREZ, BARKER, MCNIEL, REMPEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT -carried-
Chairman Rempel advised that the following items would be heard concurrently
by the Commission,.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACTS 12318 & 12318-1 - LEWIS
HOMES - A total residential eve opment of 70 singe ami y attac ed
wellings on 74 lots ranging from 3100 sq. ft. to 6750 sq. ft. on 9.5
acres of land, generally located on the east side of Haven Avenue, north
of Deer Creek Channel - APN 1077-091-10.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACTS 12364 & 12364-1 - LEWIS
�P1E= A totalresi en'61 eve opr1ent o sing a farm y detached
was on 71 lots ranging from 46DO sq. ft. to 11,590 sq. ft. on 14.4 acres
of land, generally located on the south side of Base Line, east of Deer
Creek Channel - APN 1677-091-02.
Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff reports.
Chairman Renvel referred to Church Street on Tentative Tracts 12318 and
12318-1 and asked if the street on the west side of the channel shouldn 't show
full development.
Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Eregineer, replied that it could be required to stow
full development since it was not going to be developed as a street.
Chairman Rempel stated that it should be completed to protect the homeowners
in that area. He farther stated that it would be helpful if the Commission
were able to see what is being proposed in adjacent areas.
Mr. Rougeau stated that putting improvements at that location could encourage
nighttime parking, thereiare it might be better to not require the
installation of the half s' eat, and suggested that the Commissioners could
discuss the pros and cons of each issue.
Chairman Rempel agreed that the issue should be discussed and also suggested
that the cross gutter and the radius curb should be installed to facilitate
drainage from Haven.
Planning Commission Minutes -2- June 22, 1983
1
Mr. Vairin advised that dedication for Church Street should be added to the
Standard Condition.
Chairman Rempel opened the public nearing.
Kay Matlock, representing the applicant, Lewis Homes, addressed the Commission
stating that they accepted the findings in the Resolution and Conditions of
Approval . She asked for clarification on the discussion regarding Church
Street as Lewis Homes did not see the purpose in building the south half of
the street since there was nothing for it to lead to at this point.
Chairman Rempel replied that the necessity of the radius curb would be to
facilitate drainage from the north to tie it into a cross gutter to dispose of
the water through the bridge area rather than have the drainage simply dump
into an open area.
Ms. Matlock advised that when development begins in the area to the east and
west of this project, Lewis Homes would be coming in with an entire area plan
for the ComTission's review.
'iere were no further comments therefore the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried to adopt
Resolution 83-83 approving Tentative Tracts 12318 and 12318-1, with the
inclusion of the dedication of Church Street, and the issuance of a Negative
Declaration.
AYES- COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, MCNIEL, JUAREZ, REMPEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT- COMMISSIONERS: STOUT -carried-
Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried, to adopt
Resolution 83-84 approving Tentative Tracts 12364 and 12364-1 and the issuance
of a Negative Declaration.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ, REMPEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT -carried-
Planning Commission Minutes -4- June 22, 1983
i.
rco.
a D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7944 - WESTLAND VENTURE - A
{ division of 5.05 acres of land into 3 parcels within thine located
on the north side of Base Line, west of East Avenue - APN 227-131-4=, 47,
48.
Paul Rouaeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report.
Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There were no public comments,
therefore the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Juarez, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried, to adopt
Resolution 83-85 approving Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 7944 and
the issuance of a Negative Declaration.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: JUAREZ, BARKER, MCNIEL, REMPEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT -carried-
E. REVISIONS OF CONDITIONS FOR PARCEL MAP 7349 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY -
Located on the north si e of t treet, east side of I- Freeway
229-283-49.
Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report explaining that
the Lewis Development Company had recently purchased this parcel and desired
to have the detention basin and landscaping for the project placed in an
assessment district to be administered by the City.
Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing.
Kay Matlock, Lewis Homes, addressed the Commission stating that administration
of the temporary drainage facility through CC&R's actually places the
maintenance burden on one of the property owners within the development and
felt that a public assessment district would be the preferred method of
assuring for maintenance.
Motion: Moved by Mc-Niel , seconded by Juarez, unanimously carried, to adopt
Resolution 82-53 A amending the City Engineer's Report (Condition 48) of
Planning Commission Resolution 82-53 by forming a Landscape Maintenance
District for future maintenance of the detention, basin, storm drain and
landscaping prior to recordation of Parcel Map 7349.
1;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, JUAREZ, BARKER, REMPEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT -carried-
Planning Commission Minutes -5- June 22, 1983
2
DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
F. STATUS UPDATE ON THE FOLLOWING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-15 - MANNELLA
AND CONDITIONAL USE PEPIT-82-27 - LESLI-E & INFANTE
Michael Vairin, Sen4or Planner, reviewed the staff report and stated that the
surrounding businesses and the Sheriff's Department had been contacted
regarding the subject business operations. There were no comments from the
business tenants or property owners regarding JJ's Arcade. He advised that
the Planning Division had initially received reports from surrounding
businesses regarding the Galaxy Arcade, however most of the concerns and
disturbances had been mitigated. He further advised that the Planning
Division would continue monitoring these uses and if problems arise, the
Commission would be advised and at that time they could take appropriate
action.
Joseph Mannella, JJ's Arcade, addressed the Commission advising that he was
contemplating selling hi- arcade and asked if the new owner would be required
to file an application for a new Conditional Use Permit.
Mr. Vairin red ied that the approval of this Conditional Use Permit would
expire with the change of ownership, therefore a new owner would be required
to file a new application which would necessitate a hearing before the
Planning Commission.
Commissioner McNeil commended the owners of the a-cades for the job they have
I� done.
ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Barker, seconded by Juarez, unanimously carried, to adjourn.
7:40 P.M. - Planning Commission Adjourned
Respectfully submitted,
Rick Gomez, Acting Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes -6- June 22, 1983
'i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Gvcnnro,�
STAFF REPORT
0
OIL �
BATE: July 27, 1983 li>
ter,
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
By: Barbara Krall , Engineeri.:g Technician
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 5697 - WESTMONT
PROPERTIES
Mr. Saul Haimowitz of Westmont Properties, developer of Parcel Map 5697, is
t•equesting an extension of time due to problems in obtaining reasonable
financing for the project. Parcel Map 5697 was tentatively approved b,
pl"ning Commission on July 6, 1981 for the division of 33.7 acres into !--
parcels for industrial use located north of 4t IgStreet ar. .ri ;mica
Avenue. This tentative approval expires on July 8,
83.
Tentative Parcel Maps are currently valid for a maximum of four years, with
appropriate extensions per the Subdivision Map Act. Since the initial
approval for the subject map was 24-months, two 12-month extensions may be
tative map and conditons of approval are attached
granted. The appproved ten
for your review.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that a 12-month extension be granted Parcel Map 5697, with
the expiration date being July 8, 1984.
Respectfully sub itYed,
v
a
Attachments
ITEM A
i
June 28, 198
Community Development Dept. . - -
Engineering Div. ^
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Baseline Road, Suite C
9a�'O -
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 917710
Dear Mr. Rougeau:
Re yours of June 24, regarding time extension for Parcel Map
5697, we hereby request an extension. Enclosed please find
our check for $62 for extension fee.
Reasons for this request are that market conditions have not
been good in terms of sales projections or for obtaining
reasonable financing for the project.
Hoping this extension will be approved, we are
Very ruly yo rs,
r .
K a G
Sud Haimowit:
16111 MorrGtoo Sleet
Erxieo, CA 914M
y
•• 'I 1
RESOLUTION NO. 81-78
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRGVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5697 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
5697 LOCATED ON SANTA ANITA AVENUE NORTH OF
FOURTH STREET.
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map T2umber 5697, su�mitted by Westmont
Properties and consisting of 12 parcels, located on Santa Anita Avenue
north of Fourth Street, being a division of Lot i6 of Parcel Map 4749;
ano,
WHEREAS, on February 19, 1980, a formal application was submitted
requesting review of the above-described tentative map; and
WHEREAS, on July 8, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above-described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTIOq 1: That the following findings have been made:
I. That the map is consistent with the proposed
General Plan.
® 2. That the improvement of the proposed
subdivision is consistent with the proposed
General Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for
the proposed development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements
will not cause substantial environmental
damage, public health problems
have
adverse affects on abutting property.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant
adverse environmental impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on
July 8, 1981.
SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 5697 is approved
subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining
thereto.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1981.
PLANNING COh,IISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: '
J r ng, Ch nn�
Resolution No. dl-/b
�..,., Page ? `(
ATTEST
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAT4, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the Sth day of July, 1981, by the follc•giny vote-to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempei , Dahl , Sceranka, icing
NOES: ComMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COKMISSIONERS: Tolstoy
C
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
' CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
® TENTATIVE MAP N0. PM 5697
FILED BY: Richard Newton
LOCATION: Santa Anita Avenue - North of Fourth Street DATE FILED: 2/19/30
NUMBER OF LOTS, 12
LEGAL D=SCRIPTION: Lot 16 of Parcel Map 4749 RECEIPT NV-IBER: 06206
FEE: $870.00
ZONE:M-2
J. Richard Newton GROSS ACREAGE: 33.7
T£1ITATIVE YAP PREPARED BY:
ADDRESS: 624 West "I" Street MINIF4JM LOT AREA:
MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE
Ontario, CA 91762
ADDRESS PHONE 0
RECORD OWNER(S) 21gJ789_3904
Westmont Properties 16111 rlorrison Street
Encino, CA 91316
REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER
Dedications
X 1 . Dedication by final map of all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary
easements as shown on the tentative map.
2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights-of-wiy on the following
streets:
additional feet on
additional feet on
additional feet on
_ Corner P/L radius required on
Other
3. Rights of vehicular access shall ce limited as foliows:�_--
4. Street vacation required for-
5. irtaster Plan of Streets revision required for:____-
-_ 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows:
RCE 20
TENTATIVE MAP NO. 5697 Page 2
Imorover:.ents (Bonding is required prior to 10 Recording for all parcels )
D Building permit for )
X 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement,
sidewalk, WrldOWYbXiQ4 khXWpxXX)bX, parkway trees and street lights) on all
interior streets.
8. Construct the follewing missing improvements on the following streets:
*ircludin landscaping and irrigation or. meter
CURB X A.C. SIDE- DRIVE STREET STREET MEDIAN {
STREET NAME GJTTER PVMT. WALK ` APPR. TREES LIGHTS IISLAND*1 OTHER
i
X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative
map, or as required by the City Engineer.
X 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water,
electric power, gas, telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities
are to be underground.
X Il . Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of
any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary.
X 12_ Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca-
tions and types approved by the City Engineer.
ll construction plans for drainage and street im
X 13. Developer is to provide a -
provemeiits. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engi»eer.
X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water
District standards. A letter of acceptance is required.
X 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southetr.
California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative
poles with underground service. new services will require an
16. The following existing streets being torn up by
A.C_ overlay:
17. The f0170 wing specs lc dimensions, � .e. , cu -de-sac radius, street section
widths) are not approved:
18. The o owing 2 sting streets are substandard :
They will require:
Approvals and Fees
X 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/
San Bernardino County Flood Control District.
X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen-
cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirement
that may be received from them.
RCE 20
TENTATIVE MAP NO. 5697 Page 3
21 . Permits from other agencies will be required as fol"01.1s:
A. Caltrans, for:
X B. city: _
C. County Dust Abatement District:
D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep:
X E. Cucamonga County Water District:
X F. Other: Flood Con+rol District for any encrcachmen
Map Cool
22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro-
vide for two-way traffic and parking on all affected streets.
23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area
and should be corrected on the final map:
X 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right-of-way line �n accord-
ance with the City of Rancho Coca-conga standards.
25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent
the creation of an unrecognized parcel located
_ 26. The boundary of ne Tentative Map needs c arificaLien as fol ows:
27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or
title explanation required.
Parcel Map Waiver
28. Information submitted at the time of application is /_ is not sufficient
to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to
requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances.
Flood_ Control (Bonding is required prior to EIRQ $Uilding g for
permit for )
X 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject
twto fl, ood-
irg under the National Flood Insurance Program.
This subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. Zone AD.
X 30. A drainage channel and/or flood protection wall along the entire north pro-
perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets.
X Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts.
31. if viater surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the
back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns.
32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:_
33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will be requ re to assess impac os increased
runoff.
RCE 20
TENTATIVE MAP N0. 5697 Page 4
Miscellaneous
X 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for
this project.
oject will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning
X 's6. Noise impact on this pr
Division report on subject property.
the present City Boundary and wiz require
37 . This property is not within
annexation.
to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re-
38. All information required
qui red:
X 39. Proper gradingmage and
to offsitenp= Mrtylshall uben9rovidede for tas�required of dimenta
X 40 Aing preliminary
reasons: A copy report
Of thewsoilsll not
report required
furnishedfor
tothis
thesBuildingtDivisionw
prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division.
tentatX 41 severitrna Of tmentne L
capacity�willve abe avap or ilable atfthem time ebuildis not ngapermitstare
requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water
District wil: be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will
got be issued unless said certification is received in writing.
X 47 6he City Engineer shall masionhMap Act,�tt3t division in c and adevelopment nce with tof the
property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise
of any puolic entity or public utility right-of-way or easement and the signa-
ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final
map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determira
tien within the specified tame limits of said Section.
X 43. At the time of Final F"ap submittal , the following shall be submitted: Traverse
calculations (sheets) , copies of recorded maps and deeds used referenced.reference and/
or shcwing original land division, tie notes eper streetnch marks . multiple lots
44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach
fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at let lines.
X 45. Dedication of addition s al 10' right-of-way on Santa Anita Avenue ccntiguous to
project boundary shall be required.
X 46. Contribution to,and participation in, theimof issuanceofbuilding permit.
may be required of each parcel at the time
rain onto Santa Anita venue.
X 47. Drainage of 7th Street shall be redesigned to d be
x 48. toe44'dat the discretion ofhthe City Engineer. Thendeterminationyshall bead
made at the time of construction permit• osed 7th Street and the
X 49. Provide a temporary street connection between the prof
bridge on Day Creek Channel for fire access.
CITY OF ;ANCHO CUCAMONGA
LLOYD B. 4UBBS
CITY ENGINEER
By: 12a&xv-
-'RCE 20
. . .. .• - smrsv s
-uu.maavna 44I l CI-L 'AMP `
:,�)F o tuat rue•f�T!
AN INDUSTRIAL S`3FriVISION '................
CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA
•�� ^- /,/ % s M�1n a a)) 7a)i4
�.� aTO SiSI .. -••.n•V'Ll.'�`/' � .. Si20i 6t
>j c � �. ,� _.{ � SZp• .. 6x Ywr t:ar�t. 4VO+9n6}
G � •\ 1 •a M•Bart.
Sm Bev u
............
\ f n \ 12 c...
IN a.ns .o ma ,�ee. ...p ,...
N •.�. as 1H. ores.
4%nSI i wEv ruP I r i :'ly\ \ sa�i.n-.tiMa•a.
IE
N G
_. -z l 1� •� �rw.-1-. 'J.Irf.
.L_.- 1 _. ..__ . �. �, LSP ac rota•>)s
]P2 J \ 47
to
�NC I I I- � 1.'S2 cc o erns:v n� c.t .erB..
r t ���ttt .. / �I i I. � 281\ � s ..c• <raa+um.
�.` 4J19 •.. �� .y) � � na'n::yn n .IQ 2T.t1 MOfa
Fx
O:OMC cv!i ilc.
� SlN VmO ruN on.rO.w0.0� lo'OOM?\l S f � e11rr7 or eOrvN.ol for Oi�s GMM
•1 d1 II f O.iOH-et OM OT M M rMi.VY IrOOM
�I � �I tY. s Oroaa � & N •isP o8 tact N To v+Bx.OM.arM-eWe rrwm aw-.vam
-
y
- c
• to
E
`'3.a xtts _ zscec
q
1 ,• �-r' Iv/
•� M, � I .soot ewt .q 2ss s �'
Y
'S
2b ye mt.530
1 `1 "0.a3
I1 R33 SB b. i -
" - i� WON
RESOLUTION NO.
Ash
APPROVING IAN TIME TEXTENSION FOR HE NCHO �TENTATIVEMONG N PARCEL NING COMMISSION,
5 '
OF MAP5697
WP,EREAS, an application has been filed for a time extension for the
above-described project; pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2(b) of Ordinance 28-B,
the Subdivision Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public
hearing for the above-described project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-
described tentative Parcel Nap.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following in zrgs:
ions
A. That lack of prevailing financingomic and high it nterestVera es caused for
construction.
B. That these economic conditions make it unreasonable
to build at this time.
C. That strict enforcement of the condition of approval
regarding expirations would not be consistent with
the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
D. That the granting of said time extension will
noor be
detrimental to the public health, safety,
or materially injurious to properties or improvements
in the vicinity.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a
time extension for the above-described project as follows:
PARCEL MAP DEVELOPER EXPIRATION DATE LOCATION
5697 Westmont Properties July 8, 1984 atoSanta Street
Anita
Ave.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
C
Resolution No.
?age 2
ATTEST:
Secretary of t e P anning Ccicrmission
1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify ttat the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a rejula following ovot the
tPlanning
Commissior held
on the 27th day of July, 1983, by 9
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �`
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO�IitiG-k �ucaMo
STAFF REPOR
DATE: July 27, 1983 �IIi II'
tom;
TO: Planning Commission
I FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: PARCEL .MAP 7051-2 AND PARCEL MAP 7061-3 - KACOR
Mr. Clinton L. Davis of Kacor, developer of Parcel Map 7061-2 and 7061-3, is
requesting an extension of time due to unfavorable economic circumstances.
Parcel Maps 7061-2 and 7061-3 were tentatively approved by Planning Commisson
on September 9, 1981 as Parcel Map 7061 to divide 78 acres into 45 parcels (4
phases) in the M-2 zone located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and
Cleveland Avenue. This tentative map expires on September 9, 1983. Phase 1
consiting of 9 parcels has been recorded.
Tentative Parcel Maps are currently valid for a maximum of four years, with
® appropriate extensions per the Subdivision Map Act. Since the initial
s, two
granted for the The apppro ed tentativeect maps smapss andh 2cond to s of nth extensions may be
approval are attached
for your review.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that a 12-month extension be granted Parcel Map 7061-2 and
7061-3, with the expiration date being September 9, 1984.
Respectfully submit-�e d,
PV
LA¢{
- jaa
Attachments
ITE14 B
CO
June 30, 1983
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
Engineering Division
9320 Baseline Road, Ste. C
Post Office Box 837
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: Barbara Krall
Engineering Technician
Re: Request for Extension
Parcel Map No. 7061-3
Dear Ms. Krali :
It is our understanding that the above-referenced Parcel Map is scheduled to
expire on September 9, 1983. As a result of recently unfavorable economic
circumstances, development of this property has not proceeded as quickly as
anticipated. Therefore, XACOR Development Company requests that this parcel
map be extended for a period of one (1) year, or until September 9, 1984.
Please contact me, if there are any questions.
Very truly yours,
Clinton L. Davis
Manager of Engineering
CLD/dv
cc: Dan Reid
Mark Singerman
i1i i'al.nnar Airport R"&Suite 201
D.nc t W1" Box 308 NLn0c"
.iY'6aG„r,edt,budYn a/[Min�.'.:owmnm cu Ci��'r.�:J.•^.,a:r.•.
June 30, 1983
�!i`.y of Rancho Cucamonga •:
Community Development Department
Engineering Division
9320 Baseline Road, Ste. C
Post office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: Barbara Krall
Engineering Technician
Re: Request for Extension
Parcel Map No. 7061-2
Dear Ms. Krali :
It is our understanding that the above-referenced Parcel Map is scheduled to
expire on September 9, 1983. As a result of recently unfavorable economic
circumstances, development of this property has not proceeded as quickly as
anticipated. Therefore, KACOR Development Company
unrirequests
that tthis
13parcel
map be extended for a period of one (1) year,
84.
Please contact me, if there are any questions.
Very truly yours,
�dz;�N
ZZA
Clinton L. Davis
Manager of Engineering
CLD!dv
cc: Dan Reid
Mark Singeman
_11l Va'.'"WI d,,ITpo[t Roid/Sntu:201
® P "t(1,tt 1,V Box 509
a:.Ir6h..d. C1IIEnrnii 9=�R-0Mo0
( I V)•i ih-16 i(p
r:,iCJR ilnd�pmat Comp+m
`��r. A snail,o¢uJ r6ttditp of Ka", i-m.-1.n.G t f.+...�:a:..y•J:: •:
C C
RESOLUTION NO. 81-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVI"JG
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7061 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO-
7061) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 6TH
STREET AND CLEVELAND AVENUE.
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7061, submitted by Kacor
Development Company and consisting of 45 parcels, located at the south-
east corner of 6th Street and Clev?iand Avenue, being a division of Lot
17, 18, 23 and north 112 of Lots 24 and 26 as recorded Map Book 4, page
9, San Bernardino County was approved by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucanonga; and,
WHEREAS, on July 16, 1981, a formal application was submitted
requesting review of the above-described tentative map; and
WHEREAS, on September 9, 1981, the Planning Commission, held a
duiy advertised public hearing for the above-described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCA;IONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
1. (hat the map is consis::ent with the proposed
General Plan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed
subdivision is consistent with the proposed
General Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for
the proposed development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements
will not cause substantial environmental
damage, public health problems or have
adverse affects on abutting property.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant
adverse environmental impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on
September 9, 1981.
SECTION 3: That Tentative parcel Map No. 7061 is approved
subject to the conditions of the City Enginei-'-, Report pertaining
thereto.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Resolution No. 81 '2
Page 2
/7
® BY:
Jef a K" g, C .airman
A ,EST:!! {(✓1�V1,1 / M
Secretary of the Planniriq CjDwri-scion
I , JACK Udi, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do he certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
he Planning
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular' meeting of the following
Co-r-rission held on the 9th day of September, 1981, by
vote-to-wit:
AYES: COKMISSIONE?S: Rempel , Dahl , Tolstoy, King
NOES: CO1.ZlISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: C0141MISSIONERS: None
ABSTAINED: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
FILED BY: R. C. Land Co. TENTATIVE MAP NO. PM 7061
LOCATION: South side of 6th Street between Cleveland DATE FILED: 7116/81
and Milliken NUMBER OF LOTS: 45
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 17, 18, 23 and N 1/2 of RECEIPT NUMBER: 12155
Lots 24 & 26 as recorded•MB4 Page 9 FEE: $250.00
ZONE: ,!-2
* * * * ,t # * •it * k * * * Yr ,r * * * * * * * ,r # * * is * * * * * $ > * it * * * i
TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Derbish & Guerra GROSS ACREACE: 78
ADDRESS: 124 East "F" Street , Suite 12 MTNIMUM LOT AREA:
Ontario_, CA 91764 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE:
RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE r
R. C. Land _ 3�35 W._Foothill , Suite C �I
Rialto. CA 92376
REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER
Dedications
X 1 . Dedication by final map of all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary
easements as shown on the tentative map.
X 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights-of-way on the following
streets:
14 additional feet on Cleveland Avenue
30 additional feet on 6th Street
additional feet on
_ Corner PA radius requirea on
Other
X 3- tights of vehicular access shall be dedicated along lots 6-11 contiguous to
ot�tSt. except two 60' openings centered on property linPc between ip u o & 10.
4. Street vacation required for.
5. Master Plan, of Streets revision required for:
6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as fol ows:
RCE 20
C �
Page 2
TENTATIVE MAP 1j0. 7061
(Bonding is required prier tom Recording forPhases 1 ,2, & 3 )
�Impro 3 0 Building permit for Pnas_ a __}
X 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement,
sidewalk, one drive sp ro ach lk on one sie in parkway parate easement)trees and street lights) on all
interior streets.
X 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets:
*includinq landscaping and irrigation on meter
CURB & A.C. SIDE- DP.IVE STREET STREET tiEDiAf1
STREET t1AttE GLITTER PVMT. WALK APP1R. TREES LI,6HTS ISLAND
* OTHEk
6th St. 1 X
X X X X X X
Cleveland X X X X
X X X
Milliken
9. Construct all ll storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative
map, or as required by the City Engineer.
X 10. Provide all util ,.tY stelephoneoandccable televasions Se s
vices eah lot conduit. Allutilities
electric power, gos,
are to be underground. a for the relocation of
X 11 . Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay
any power poleSiateostreetxnamer�signslic andutraffics as controlesigns with lor_a-
X 12. Install appropr roped by the City Engineer.
tions and types app
X 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street Na
prove- - - s. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer.
X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County :dater
District standards. A letter of acceptance be regroved by the Southern
X 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be app
California Edison Company and the City of RancY,o Cucamonga shall be decorative
poles with underground service. b new services will require an
16. The following existing streets L•eing torn up Y
A.C. overlay:
17. The a owing speci �c dimensions, i.e. > cu -de-sac radius, street section
widths) are not approved:
18. The o ouing existing stre substandar
They will require:
Approvals and Fees
_ 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CAL''+RAtdS/
San Bernardino County Flood Control District. requirements
X 2C. Approvals have not beensecured
f the fioalall utillagen-
tbessubjecthea any rested requirements
ties involved. Approval
that may be received from them.
i;
RCE 20
TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7061 Page 3
X 21 . Permits from other agencies will be required as follows:
_ A. Caltrans, for:
B. City:
X C. County Dust Abatement District:
D. D. I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep:
X E. Cucamonga County Water District: sewer and water
F. Other:
Map Control
X 22. 1 , only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shah be made to pro-
:•ide for two-way traffic and parking on all affected streets.
23. The follaw?ng lots appear to be substandard in eit;,>_r frontage, depth or area
and should be corrected on the final map:
X 24. all corner lots shall have F_ corner radius at the right-of-way line in accord-
ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards.
25. A Parcel Map shall bo recorded prier to the first phase subdivision to prevent
the creation of an unrecognized parcel located
26. The boundary of the .,:ntative Map needs clarification as follows:
27. The border shall be sho;.n to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or
title explanation required.
Parcel Map Waiver
28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient
to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Cert;ficate, according to
requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances.
Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to ❑ Recording for )
❑ Building permit for j
X 29. Proposed subdivision fails within those areas indicated as subject to flood-
ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be
subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24.
30. A drainage charnel and/or . loud protection wall along the entire north pro-
perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets.
`{ Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts.
_ 31. If r•-jater surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the
back of the siaewalk at all downstream curb returns.
_ 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:
33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will be required to assess impact of Increased
runoff.
X 34. Installation of a portion of the Master Planned Sto rnr Drain No. 7E may be
required at the discretion of the City Engineer. The extent of the improve-
ment shall be as determined by the City Engineer and to be coordinated with
Assessment District 79-1 project.
RCE 20
TENTATIVE MAP NO- 7061 Pace 4
iscel_ 1` a=eous
dition of issuance of the grading permit for
X 35. Dust at:tement will be made a con
this project.
X 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning
Division report on subject property.
37 . This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require
annexation.
d to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as r -
38. All information require
quired:
vell
01
X 39 Proper
gdamage and
to cerosion
ffsiteprocont,
,shallubenprovidede for tas�requiredaI of imenta-
40. A preliminary soils ref rt will not bierport quired for to is sBueldingtDevisionw-
in9 reasons: A copy ehe
prior to grading will be furnished to nofnsame^doesvnot guarantee that
X 41. The filing of the tentative map o approval
sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are
ted. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County
District will be asked Water
reques to certify the availability of capacity.
Permits will
District
not be issued unless said certification is received in writing.
X 42 nce wit
he City
Engineer shall
makeoth detet,that division nation, in tand adevel development the
with the free
property will not unreasonably interfere ee and complete exercise
of any public entity or public utility right-of-way or easement fnromtihesfenal
ture of any such public entity or public utilit may
map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said deterrrira-
tion within the specified time limits of said Section.
X 43- At the time of Firzilcalculations {sheets)l,�copies�ofarecorded12 'the hraps�andsdeedshallbused astreferencevand/
d division, tie notes and approach nch marks!perstreetTefl
or showing original lan ".ultiple lots
X 44. Development shall be limited to one drive app roaches at lot lines.
fronting on a single street shall use common dive approaches
X 45. Conceptud? grading plan shall be approved by the Building Official prior to
recordation of Parcel Map.
X 46. Ap Lot
o�Line Adjustment
recording modify
ina?thmapshape of Parcel 1 of 7061-2 shall he recorded
to
CITY OF RANC40 CUCA`ONGA
LLOYD B. gUBBS
CITY ENGINEER
By: x4v
RCE 20
k N' • 7q
Ll
VD
El
El I VD
El
21
I I / � i`I t � G•' � i � m
t` cC� F j ���'� i �� � �. :. � �' � I • � j j _ _ �r � Sib ,
L <
1
I H rc
•I tl
' 1 '. iFii ti( •� I :Y
j
RESOLUTION NO.
® A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION,
APPROVING TIME EXTENSIONS FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL mP 706' 2
AND 7051-3
WHEREAS, an application has been filed for a time extension for the
above-described projects, pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2(b) of Ordinance 28-8,
the Subdivision Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a Duly advertised public
hearing for the above-described projects; and
WHEREAS, the rlanning Commission conditionally approved the above-
described tentative Parcel Maps.
SECTION I- The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following fin ings:
A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a
lack of financing and high inteeest rates for
construction.
B. That these economic conditions make it unreasonable
to build at this time.
C. That strict. enforcement of the condition of approval
regarding expirations would n^t be consistent with
the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
D. That the granting of said time extensions will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,
or materiai;y injurious to properties or improvements
in the vicinity.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissior hereby grants a
time extension for the above-described projects as follows:
PARCEL MAP DEVELOPER aPIRATION DATE LOCATION
70£1-2 Kacor September 9, 1984 SEC 6th Street
7061-3 and Cleveland
APPROVED AND ADOPTED !HIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stoat, Chairman
0
Page 2
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify tLat the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commissior of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 27th day of July, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
Y
i'
i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �.�A:o,�
STAFF REPORT
�+ t
o
o �
} z
DATE: Luffy 27, 1983 077
TO: Members of the Planning commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT'. TRACT 11013 - LEWIS - Reapplication for design review of
-30 singe Tamily homes on 3.0 acres of land in the
R-1-10,000 zone located at the southeast corner of Banyan
and Amethyst - APN 1062-401-10.
BACKGROUND: Lewis Development proposes the completion cf 30 single
tami y we ing units on Tract 11013, located on Amethyst near Banyan
Street. Individual parcels are adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed single family residences. In general,
architectural design of these units has variety and visual ircerest
consistent with the existing neighborhood; however, the Design Review
Committee was concerned with providing additional variety and suggested
® that unit setbacks be staggered. In addition, the Committee recommended
adding details to side elevations on some turner parcels. Conditions
reflecting the Committee's recommendations have been included in the
attached Resolution.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider
all material and elements of this project. If the Con+ission concurs,
adoption of the attached Resolution would be in order.
Respt�ully submitted,
t t
Rick Gomez
City Planner
Rt:FD:jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A° - Site Plan
Exhibit "B" - Elevations
Exhibit "Co - Previous Conditions - Tract 11013
Resolution of Approval
db
ITEM C
' 4' T4 T
14]9'!CI
Itr
=.r
. -•• b a, •� �I � �� 1��L t �l
4
cr
3 '
436-3-T I s 1 $439SE , ~ A .n
r.• 1': y ;� —� � S. I Ili�l. J '��' � - _ � � - it t � i�
_ I
'i"L
`ice•-..� '-1- 1 - _ \ I I. 1 _ �`_ ��� S � �. I T
^' •I �1 'fin , I , , , roR9,T 1 ; , , • _ - �`,-
�
43fmL-6. "=V•erl cZ IS �£V. I I •� • '. 4'J-p I j, l i �_ 1
CITY OF ITEM,
RANCHO CUCAN'10\TGA TITLE:
Pd ANNLNG DIVISION EXHIBIT- SLALE-
-rMr\.........ur..a.n�ii�.' r.urwww+•.......w...w..'rr 4rww•. ..�... .,
• t"`•...'.Y+Ywrrrn.wrrYr.Y-+•/`^ '_'_'"y.ry r �w..rryr•'w'rr.-+w
{.� _ _ .u...nrwYl.' y,r�r,`uY•.anuw�ensu.w. '�
y. I��••a+p•.rwr�r �„:ej.\I?� w'\p'Mfer'It'lr• wMr�Wr
Y� - -�Yy�.pr�Y4 N• Mew—y�r.�r••\N'
.. \w�nYNtLL 1•M �\r�^w\rr.r.\O\`Y .JI�I A 1� �. YI+Fw
-f7I'n'YWI+'rwn ���� ��y✓+r'I 1 r`�` )'J�� i.
M eW.1w'YYII f�l �N ♦Y\YT—' I�•r"� �n\a2�
��wrYlrl' �•�M���I�4� 1 //� \-L�MI1VY�r � '
�0>YIwrH:lrwwrrrY—'www•YM r\Iti4 d?�// I u�L'� _� Y
warwrr
I All
"- Asti ,�•. ..�— �_-T' _ w
yry� wrr,r.i -\•="w //... , `\ a..'wMa.�•.wr�r.. �.arn. 1•^Y
G3♦��,�\,aar'wwrwwooYr.- �-. `v��aYi'n�Yi•r�X� �.irr.
7an
�'t\ rr'�`,�er® a �1�� � �I � awn•'rwwo�/ �`���-.ur �y
now
•a•w'u\M�r,...�rpzirr�.r. ¢I._�IIC����w..tY'r_IA .. '.�— �! �'•^ ��```•, \ ,
+1y/'r•wrfUlrY/w ,.oaf+N>ub��:9 I/ - � .
�'Y'r_w'r"rrrrrlio�ir'•w��wru�� ��''.I 1-r 1^ � w
u''[•a� '� i �•'.•' � ' ___---------- Q.fl
IT
-
p�lVlGr�l�ifffA\ilfYriffitflrIYIT1Yai1 tea=Cif+�^ii wfw.f�esV�>v r+i�f•�I
a_r,r�•wNgfpwnnJiwsr�rraaM�w,fP.r YwrY r�Nr I
•.•' erYratwwallrwwrlrw:>*wYlcrn.}aarww.larYwrlrrunuH'.t �s�nb.�.t��r�wr�Q'�+•�:'�pa.• f a�_� ..
IY7wrwsrrwwwrr+\Yrrr'•Ya� '�I_—�Ar�r sw�sYwwv•'YlMrwwww j i �•
,wa\MYwaYN\�YN YrrY.arr�''N\rr T r Jp1•Yw'ww�a-�r arYY�'iYYww.rY�,' c
MN�.Yaflwl�'rrrr•Grrrrr4w Hl�r/1wFwY�•YSMr�Y.! '\ • .AEI
♦}- arw rww•Yeg\WYYa'rwraMlNrr•rwr
��r�Ya>11YIR+.'r eggs
/iwrlirrrNtY�M Y.w Yi\���rYl7 Ylari'/wvrYl.rMrw1�YL Y ..
^ r•r.rYYNwr•Yro'+.rwr'a oi�rY���v`iw�s'Y+w�eeaY�'Yw w:.� 4�
••ww ,~wwYw�•ramra JAwsrwrraY.w►1•w Yaw.sara aleracs u...'r�� .
aY►^rr_rrY:a.rn ww•crr
s�li��i� yYr\rrwwaYlYraNwY}wwa•MrYw��i
. ��irwr�a�s.��•.rrw\rrrr`srryrrwwsaY./+\+••.Y+w.Yrula'Y.w.aYr.��"!�w�yr Nia�r�w��.>r"
rwrsY,arteww _\.Y.Yrwr NrrrNr•aw\fnwa.r Yr+.wrY.w.\er •ww+ tea, w.•.�Hw"+�.awY\
r'rwwra•Y\r r..
.. � - `vrww rlrR•rirrYY.r•aa'Niu,sYwl Nr.W M.�a••Y\.•aY+iNi�a irau0 •.w4P+a—..w,•1\r'•
�.rtw. wY+1 Iwo.. ra •r,r s./e r'.\ww.r•
\I � � _. >_ `r.Ye w_ 'r'rM aY_r�w:l rauJr\uY.vr •'Yluer ! ...
'� ; ;�� "_� �� � � I�-���'��� ..t�lilem�` I ��Itl� ► ��II�U� f •'�
-
-,,,�� � � am�nn _mmIms Iu�mu
"1-Y f_f
_ f
RESOLUTION NO. 80-80
C
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11013.
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11013, hereinafter "Map"
sub<-nitted by C. H. Brubaker, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing
the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
if
San Bernardino, State of Calornia, described as 10 acres of land
located on the Southeast corner of Amethyst and Banyan Avenues and being
subdivided into 30 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission
for public hearing and action on October 22, 1980; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map
subject ;:o all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning
Divisions reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Di_ision reports and has considered other
evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOtd, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
Section 1. The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11013 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable
interim and proposed general and specific plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent Witt. all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to
humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of
record, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
Resolution No. 30- _
Page 2 10 0 w
C (g) This project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and a Negative Declaration is issued.
Section 2. Tentative Tract Map No. i1013, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
Planning Division
1. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or
prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision
map is involved, +critten certification from all affected
School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of
Community Development which states that adequate school
facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students
generated by this project. Such letter of certification
must have been issued by the School District within sixty
'60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of
the subdivision map -or issuance of permits in the case of
all other residential projects.
2. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or
prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is
involved, written certification from the affected water
district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or
r will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be
submitted to the Department of Community Development.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district
within sixty (6C) days prior to final map approval in the
case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of
all other residential projects. For projects using
septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional
Water.Cont.,ol Board and the City, written certification
of acceptability, including all supportive information,
shall be obtained and submitted to the City.
3. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical
height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped
and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting
shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover
and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and
irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy
and thriving condition by the developer until each individual
unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing
occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes
shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine
that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom
lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with
native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative
method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official.
irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided
to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination.
. : Page 3
4. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative
subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building
permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve
(12) months from the approval of this project unless an
extension has been granted by the Planning Commission.
5. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks
shall be installed on each unit in this project.
6. Security devic.�s such as window locks shali be installed
on each unit.
`7. ' This subdivision was not submitted as a total development
package and is required to reapply for a point rating
relative to the design section of the Growth Management
Ordinance if the subdivision is going to be developed as
tract homes.
8. Detailed plans of the landscaping and decorative walls or
fences along Banyan Avenue shall be subject to review and
approval b- the City Planner prior to final approval and
recordation of the map.
9. A detailed plan of tree removals, tree replacement,
trimming, and saving shall be submitted to the City
Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of
grading permit.
10. A minimum twelve (12) foot landscape parkway to include
trees, .shrubs, ground cover and irrigation shall be
provided along "D" Street of the Tract Map to the satisfaction
of the City Planner.
11. The developer shall explore the possibility of landscaping
the M.W.D. Easement between Klusman and Amethyst Avenues
for park purposes with the Director of Community Services
and the M.W.D. If this is acceptable to M.W.D. and the
Director of Community Services, then the developer shall
develop the park at a cost not to exceed the required
park fees. Maintenance of such areas shall be by the
Maintenance District.
12. A statement shall be placed in the White Report that there
are properties to the east of this development which are
permitted animal type uses. A copy of such statement shall
be filed with the City prior to sale of the properties.
Enqineering Division
13. Approval of use of Metropolitan Water District property
and dedication of easements for roadway purposes through
the property shall be obtained and recorded prior to
recordation of the final map.
Resolution No 60 1
Page 4 - -
14. App7oval of M.W.D. of the street improvement puns within
its right-of-way shall be required.
I.S. All existing easements lying within the future right-of-
way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City
Engineer' s requirements, prior to recordation of the
tract map.
16. Banyan Street landscaped parkways are required to be
annexed into the landscape maintenance district.
17. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed
on public right-of-way on the perimeter of this tract
area shall be continuously maintained by the developer
until accepted by the City and annexed into the landscape
maintenance district.
18. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any
existing utility facility that would affect construction.
19. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks.
Under sicewalk drains shall be installed to City standards.
20. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and
disposal of surface drainage entering the property from
® adjacent areas.
21. Private drainage easements with improvements for cross
lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated on
the final map.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED ?HIS LOTH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1980.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Richard Dahl , chai an
ATTEST:
Secretary cf the Planning Cer. dv;ion—
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
l® Commission held on the 10th day of December, 1980 by the following vote
to-wit:
r•/ rcyc .'
C AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Rempel , King, Tolstoy, Dahl
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
• DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
® -rc - ttot3
Subject ee��
Applicant: �i• >T1• 1
Location: era,
Those items checked are conditions of approval .
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLL014ING
CONDITIONS:
A. Site Development
1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file
in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein.
2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of
approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of
building permits.
3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of
the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at
time of Building Peniit issuance.
4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation
Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards.
5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and
located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division.
6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with
view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be
subject to approval by the Planning Division.
7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill
Fire Districts as "hazardous", the roof materials must be approved by the
Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit.
S. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division
for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
_Zg. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally
inte5rated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent propert;rs
and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions.
Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced
thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be comp':ted to
the satisfaction of .the Director of Community Development.
11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Division prior to issuan,:e of t,iilding permits. SU61 plan
shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of
shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties.
12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall
be solar heated.
13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open
spaces and recreational use;.
14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with al: recepticals
kept out of public view from private and public streets.
15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Planner and Building 'Official prior to occupancy of the first
unit.
16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be ident;fied in a
clear and concise mar.^::r, including proper illumination.
17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be
installed on each unit in this project.
_ 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit.
19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted
for a solar water heating unit.
20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be
incorporated into this project to include such things as but rot limited
to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double
pane:' windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc.
21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a
solar water heating unit.
_ 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the
satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District.
23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout
-- the tract in accordance with the Equestrian. Trail Plan for Alta Loma.
A detailed equestrian trai'I plan indicating widths, maximum slapes,
physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City
equestrian trail standards shall be submitted tc and approved by the
City Planner briar to approval and recordation of the final map.
24. This tract shall form or arnax to a maintenance district for maintenance
of equestrian trails.
k`
e
25. This project shall provide percent of affurdable housing and/or
rents, in conformance with Generai Plan housing policies and the housing
criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall
I be determined by current market rates., rents and median inco:,:E levels
at the time of construction of the protect. Proof of this provision
shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building
permits and occupancy of the units.
B. Parking and Vehicular Access
1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension
of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall .
_ 2, Park-ing lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size.
_ 3, All -wo-way aisle widths shall be a mini,..un, of 24 feet wide.
4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum
of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with
Foothill Fire District requirements.
_ S. All parking spaces shall be double striped.
_ 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers.
7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked.
g, The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on
this site unless they are the princ;ple source of transportation for the
owner.
9. No parking shall be pem'tted within the interior cirulation aisle other
than in designated visitor parking areas_ C.C. & R. 's shall be developed
by the applicant and submitted to the City planning Division prim to
issuance of building permits.
C. Landscaping
�1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved
by the Plannin DivisLirnn ,prior to the issuance of building permits-or
VI
�2. Existing trees shall to retained wherever possible. A master plan of
e.xis_ing trces showing their precise lo=ation, size and type shall be
r:orpieted by the developer. S, id plan shall take into account the
proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior tc approval of the final grading plan.
}
_Z3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be
trimmed and topped at 30' . Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees
shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division
during the review of the Master Flan of Existing On-Site Tree. Those
trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a
tree-for-tree basis as provided by the Planning Division.
4. Street trees, a minimum of 35 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in
accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and shali be planted at an average of every 30' on interior
streets and 20' on exterior streets.
_ 5. Aminimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes,
shall be provided within the development; 20%-24" box or larger, 70%-15
gallon, and 10�-5 gallon.
_ 5. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition,
free from weeds, trash, and debris.
7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and
are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with
slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope
planting shall include but not be 14mited to rooted ground cover and
appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall
be continuously maintained in c healthy and thriving conaition by the
developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer.
Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes
shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in
satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisionq, all
such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading
or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building
Official . Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to
germinate the seed and to a point E :-tonths after germination.
_ 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained
by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such
proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance
of building permits.
_ 9- The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall
be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans.
10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and
sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall
be subject to approval by the Planning Division.
11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted
within the project.
12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman
size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along
D. Signs
1 Any signs proposed for thi, development shall be designed in conformance
® — with the Comprehenskve Sign Ordinance. and shall require review and approval
by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs.
2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the
Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of
Building permits.
3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this
approval and will require separate sign review and approval .
E. Additional ADDrOyals Required
1. Direcior Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building
Penni t.
2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final
subdivision map.
3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval
of Zone Change and/or Varance/Conditional Use Permit
4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at
which time the Planning Commission ay add or delete conditions or revoke
m
the Conditional Use Permit.
5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by
purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on
or adjacent to their property.
In purchasing the homE located on Lot , Tract >
on , I have read the C.C. & R. 's and
Vndcrsta,.d that said of is subject to a mutual re-
ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian
traffic to gain access.
Signed
Purchaser
Said statement i, to be filed by the developer with the City prior to
occoparcy.
6. Prior to approvai and recordation of the Pinai map, or prior to issuance of
building permits, when no subdivision map is invoived, written certification
from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of
Ces-nunity Develo^ment which states that adequate school facilities are or
will be capable of acco:rmodating students generated by this project. Such
letter of certification must have beer. issued by the School District within
sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision
residential projects.
map or issuance o, permits in the case of all other
t'
_ 7. Prior to approval and recordation or the final map_ or prior to the issuance
of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the
affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or
will be available to serve the proposed projec'.:, shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by
the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in
the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other
residential. projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable
by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, wri ;:ten certi-
fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be
obtained and submitted to the City.
8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map
is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is
involved, within twelve (12) months from t�,=! approval of this project
unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission.
9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is
required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design secticn
of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation
of the .Tap if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE W!TH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
F. Site Development
_t,of 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uiform Building Code,
Unifor,.: Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Naiicnal Electric Code, and
all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval
of this project.
Prior tp issuance_ of building permits for combustible construction, evidence
shall: be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply
for fire protection is available.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling
unit(s) or major addition to an existin:., unit(s) , the applicant shall pay
deve`-=ent fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee.
4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit fo- a new commercial or iiCustrial
development or addition to an existing development, the applicant -:3a: l pay
development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan
Checking Fees.
5. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued
for this project within one year from the date of pr:ject approval .
_Z6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official .
7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material
and non-combustible roof material .
t _ B_ All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the
street :pgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding
or plan-ons where appropriate.
G. Existino Structures
1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances
considering use, area and fire-r(-sistiveness of existing buildings.
2. Existing building(s) shall be :Wade to comply with current Building and
Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished.
3. Existing sewage disnosal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped
to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code.
H. GradinG_
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform
Bui';dino Code, City Grading Standards and accented grading practices.
The final grading plan shall be in substantial c_,+formarce- -ith the
approved conceptual grading plan.
® 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the
State of California to perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist
and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check-
-.Z4. The final grading p14r, shall be subject to review and approval by the
Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shah be completed prior
to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit
whichever comes first.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH 7HE FOLLOIv:ING
COND ITT O?JS:
I. Dedications and Vehicular Access
1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights-of-way
and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights-of-way on the
follo,wirg streets:
additional feet on
additional feet on
additional feet on
3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards.
4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall bp dedicated as
c�J follows: �Nor?sn '� 5±0i mi aw IgoC J �PY�. _
to, Y -�
5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over
private roads, drives, or parking areas.
S. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal
circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the
property or in the operation of the proposed business.
J. Street improvements
Construct full street improvements including. but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street
lights or, all interior streets.
V 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to:
CURB & A.C. SIDE- DRIVE STREET A.C. WHEEL
STREET NAME GUTTER PVMT. WALK APPR. LIGHTS OVERLAY CHAIR RAMPS OTHER
✓ Ve p I ✓ V __ r s/ c
{{ _ �rtQv
ro i ✓ i
! 1 I 1
V� 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, an encroachment
permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in
addition to any other permits required.
✓ 4 Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements,
prior to issuance of an ercroachm-,rt permit.
5. S::rety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public
improvements; prior to recording of the ,map or the issuance of ouilding
permits, whichever comes first.
✓ 5. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City
r Engineer, prior to occupancy.
Y 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed
per the requirements of the City Engineer.
K. Drainage and Flood Control
1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage
-- facilities required by the City Engineer.
2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations:
3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding
under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions
of the program and City Ordinance No. 24.
A drainage channel anal/or flood protection wail will be required to protect
the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street.
streety shall be desi._:ned as�major water carrying
street) requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type
drive approaches, roiled street connections, flood protection walls, and/or
landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line.
L. Utilities
I. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground
! including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV.
® 2. Utility easements shall be provided tc the specification cf tlic serving
utility companies and the Citv Engineer.
�3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public
utilities, as required.
(/ 4. Developer sha-il be- responsible for the installation of street lighting in
— accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards.
✓/5. Water a.,d sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet
reouir-�-ents -of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCdD) , Foothiil Fire
District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San
Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWID will be required prior to
/ recordation.
6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested
agencies involved. Approval of the final map will he subject to any
requirements that may be received from them.
M. General Recuirements and Approvals
Permits from other agencies will he required as follows:
A. Caltrars for: )
8. Coi:nty Dust Abatement required prior to issuance of a grading permit
C. Sdn Bernardino County Flood Control District
�D. Other: hIJ
ti
w"
2. A copy of the Covenaats, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) and Articles
of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of
the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to
the City. _
4/ 3. Pricr to recordation, a Notice of IntL-ntion to form Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Council . The engineering costs
involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer.
/4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures.
i,.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPRES FOR TRACT
11013�, LOCATED ONING THE ITHE EAT SIDE OF AMETHYST,GN OF 30 SINGLE FAMILY MNEAR BANYAN
WHEREAS, on the 5th day of July, 1983, a cosrplete application was
filed by Lewis Development, applicant for the above-described project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has previously approved Tract 11013
(Resolution No. 80-80); and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee tas recommended approval of said
project, with appropriate conditions.
WHEREAS, the project point rating exceeds the minimum threshold as
required by the Growth Management Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Rancho c:&-r :nga Planning Commission does
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: FINDS=
1. The design and layout of the proposed development
will not unreasonably interfere with the use and
enjoyment of nd igwilling,ot existing
create orraffic future
er
developments, a
pedestrian hazar- s.
2. The architectural design of the proposed development
is compatible with the character of the surrounding
area and will create a harmonious, orderly and
attract;ve development contemplated in the General
Plan of the City.
3. The design of the proposed development would provide
a desirable environment fe its occupants and
visiting public as well as its neighbors through good
aesthetic use of materials, texture and color that
will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a
reasonably adequatE level of maintenance.
4. That the proposed development, together with the
conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,
or materially injurious to properties or improvements
in the vicinity.
5. That the proposed development will comply with each
of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
Resolution No.
Page 2
SECTION 2: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Design Review for Tract 11013 is
approved subject to the following conditions aad attached standard conditions:
1. Various side elevations (occurring on corner parcels)
seen from public view shall include additional
architectural details and building relief designed to
provide variety and visual interest.
2. Unit setbacks shall be staggered ± five feet. A
minimum 25, setback shall be
3. The Developer shall comply with all conditions of
approval for Tract 11013.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 271"0 DAY OF JULY, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF -[ lE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of @ancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoic ! Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the ?lanning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comm;ssion held
un the 27th day of July, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMIS=.ONERS:
NOES: COMISSIONERS:
ti
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
f
.;z
III
vP -✓ � a 8 oYc t
P^ C� 4d iL0 DLq � _ O PVC •O C YC�V SOr
V O `� c ^ R •O O^ � R N r ✓ V
T� 0 C q rY Q t a C c y .Lqn� V q r 6 q q •_• 46 F T `V d
yL Ooa -„O• C �P `r ate•' �` D .[ 4� Lt
q C 9 N g q V N✓ O«r r V q d q� _O 6a d 6 �� N� E V� g y
V
c c 'L'v "•^� _ar v«
.f
a^aO`v
d 'V L Y i` R V N� � N✓ N 7 V y� 6 � q«� Y L 0 0.
d ^ 6N0 R Y Cy qL bL^ _ q6 �fC9NrR
L N V C a q rn �.L C ✓D V✓ 9 P C d N 4 q
^0 r C q N .v —` � V p I q G „ c a✓ r c d V r Y O
°1>�
✓`O C C is 5
y V P C•n N P-� b Y d d N N L Q `9 L^ C�q V N R^ 9
c -
o
M .Z V R Rp � .•C J C O C = Y O q �C �•^ O O C N �r i`^6 S
> o •'«L« e9r1,.N+ n>.c^ p9 v>u �_ 4 p _ o Nu ZbY^ Iq..«< N
�✓ C pp �.`G 4-.Y� RL R� SO • rJ NZY PO « CCY Fq
V«y OTNE � • L qL Vr CC LL L_~Y 4C a q CY 9YVYQa ^
p T•,Cl ^� .9� ` PC 8Y'>P G^ rWq 4rJY LE Or C90 �' ?���>' ._,
Y � a EO C 8::9= N 6 L 9 N O_V ✓�L D q ^ �.^^ N O Y.^
Cy V i E O�2L ^ CO V = ^N >Q C^� L L C� L �O q.• q N W - 9
EO yVdO T 'J ``m 6a ,ARM ^MR rt:MO NO< SY J•i9 RY
L � 6 RL 6 6 NRD R 4
t
r
1
1 t I a tee. qT�11t Eli
•^ �^ c�Qw yc o 1 •�O « O 6 C O� 0
W
1 j DCO � a00 VL CL e•L✓ .^ G60 q r ✓ RN ✓^ y
e L
^ V O O y« R O R O Y R C L r M O C
s p 9 N
S V^` ryLryg0 •Nn^ O QO `P pVWY C��v
W NY« RAY .V. L O
S . 2 C NL �'yRN CVV .
S N N l C Ry
.0
Zy YOB V-•� O
Vy0
Vj ¢ n E C C C^ V 9 pC N« g V o O L r V=
. W V
O O 1 9 T_� ^ 4y N^ V •q O 9 C N w' r V O 1 Z«V
-tp
j p L O
y _ � �-• _ < qyO
7 V y 0 �, O•,,.� !U� L r C M
O O O R•L ip
G.•'p-
NOcc .CO PO RC
r Q T N
• 2 N � 61 Z C U E T C _R C 2 V 4 y 0�
Y r u^ dY
Ow^d
Y V GRCu.q Y Yr ` Y= wL r� Vim^ MygV >L=�
pV� � C L O ^ C� .O C Y V C •• R O O w
1 1 Y 2 p 6 >S V 1 L'? H 1\ L R _O `• O ¢ V/ 6 N ^ O Y S C.V fG
N
R 4
j i m
4 ,.
p� L�T✓ou ba.� caq � P , `0°10� c.o oa SLc
_ c N E q- o✓
Y� g O C A- u 9 4- Y t q N C - O Y Y^ A L ✓
L MYUVL` NOJ✓ Or Q PVA D 'a rA d AC� A n > Gp nC9N
o. •J wL' iG .` ,Ji. n« E« P n Nn Lo cw .d+ a,�
L`aj j�A c o. q o.r c o Gnu a.
O 0�9i0ICO y0.• . �«- Cd Vr i O YY^_ nq� EY�C �d
d E E N V✓ >N�m C V O^4 A 9 � L T A O Y F y n • C G
p�aTO V C-9L V A« V A � 9 L ✓ T6C =� O 4r�
40.d ny NY C« OLD L PA N O YCa ^a dEYa•] NO CV 9 9P6 F .O� - A9 G�Oi W
N9b�. E c^ a � o� V `^ �•` � ✓ t a.L.c. q > 19 � ACN ad
" C- J U E Ncc - D a qL O did a� -N-YS�� NYC NA � E 6 A� =✓ OL C ,aP WN� O.a �
9Y� SW L dPV ✓ M1IL ^ O ACa L uN ✓ PjJ� � OrN A_d
YOW dV9 FL� V LP ✓. 9a dj.rO _L day r9i�C .
d,O qq A O OT_ ... L- A 6 AN✓ O OVO aCl a
A L V 9 O N C t b N•G L n A C a Y L M 9 N 4 Y C V q 4 6 C A
a d a S L O2
9 £tea�•-�d�'n e_ ,,,r_•• .i
AJ L__ J.P.i OYrO C f.'Jr ^� P LO V N VaC� 9✓- 4 NNgPP
AO-�LYW G-adC !y` C 6 q0� =Oaul C N! OC�V d ~w- YY OP
YU VrY GL^u- u aJ •.. ^ Tom•`... PAL L - T � O _ VaY > + Cr WMC
C Z a D C > _ N d C M Y✓
-
9 A` 7 N-j
Y N B�• p 4
�NL90i�9- OYO N YO L _ �� V� b - •.� 4ta�Yb V - OL4
6- AGV LNL - � L9N 6-r 6 60 H ^
� W
CV
V«✓V d W Y V N A 9 T«O = PY := ,;l L S PM •
v c o0
.L.. EMciYc —YQ —
QufJ C.W. WA A l-_ AVM
�a Y9 O V P6 d Ed n,
p 09 Y 6^ YOT9'1
.d4 L i •� NL
c-c
r4 aci
L�cW
MQOA ^ W Cj�v V NL O. 1 _'LOO - O, UY�rL
6NCA a a O.VLC « t L COS 4. r V VLN 4VwOL
L q L N Z y=
pcd4 A n a A. LPL.. Wo � ' cE 9g LfrY
AocE c - ^�
,r vim•_ �.+ .a N ✓ S c« qL. � a�.L._ ccu-i.n_. u�
Yd i � O o V AYV � EAV qAr = EL NtW
V� C L J� r C A✓=9 4 ` C M C 9 C C W a N V r 1-V 4^O O
V 6 !✓ Y Y� ✓ N E O�� d V O �y.q� C N
{
9 L E O C V N N A V
Gy l�
yi. Z F y'j O
.a r_ L v•_ N✓ �E o0o Y � ca APc
do�
Ll O •.] L L P«d� V Y Y O L C L d L A V >^ V V r«9 Q C
� u N C� �� L O Y C A N= A�^O L ��- A C � •J L O` d
dco� � � .L. ` 9 W g't ✓a '>. '" ." c v p,a�r pd M - o
GC J L n
. `OA d0 V 1L u4iWO .N � y JN Ta YCy 6' AOGwNp - O
c qw c a �o •o -9 u eL
p q t^^ P O Cc
•u VC�'r WG
P d
T� eC C' •� - C TO.V _V 9 Q 6JV-C 6��- A V q=✓ CaL9
J� • d l 9 A L J A P l Y r = 9 -V _C � - r�Y W 0 O N Y [19>w w
t��•¢L! •O A \n .!� w A rN pC GEY6 �L OOI GG 6- )y.iNLr�.
A
•Lw F /•1 f
T
i
1 «c A y F yY c = c O
P•La �V L � 4 V Q C A •I
Lim N� V v y ` ✓ O d
f A A A G N— b d •• ~
43
o N i
z �S L � N✓ u V d C
�^ C • N p V! A {Y 0
ZP V L O v E O O O
L O!
A > ✓L � 4'L'e G �W VN ✓ V IJ A— L
nv cn ` .bl u o Ems.. ` m na oco u o u
T
- � o✓ > F iN a I q✓ � E� 6y�✓ OE y�? G L
9 G a ^ .yo ✓ q t �W V G F s
P « L N L ✓ p S W �
^' paN yN Lm LG D LA. .Y,C C✓A` ^— — • '° yQ ^ a .�"'
«OLCL r« PN ^ Y. VA^ + VN mj]•.r COp .� L G YO
02✓ QN �L Np N i �' A� Ndd_ �'^ Ti 4 `! �9
��+ C O GS V F Y A ✓V VLNp A •AGO' V N� C
F L G • �lJ � � 9 l N V r y W C „ V A_O l y N Y C V
A CA 6TN ! C 04 W br L „ 4
V T Y A� O N✓ Cc� > > N W V V O+ O A A ! L rOe � L g m Y
�! L a)L E 6 � N' qN� M„ JO eY dy 8 AOLNS
V 6 G N O A+ G ^I y •�q ^ E O E C+ l > V O ti 4 �
Ir-. A�A� 6 G Cl Ll V 6 O 6 C W W W E L 6 V!V C O•! 6
A V \)I
1
M
1
1
w 4 A P « V AiO `J = =may L CN 4L L O 6JC
_ F _ �y y0•y � C A
V O d N P A V •V. w W G• r 0 M G L V C R V V a
LNa y}� Ot LSO N E S.
^y NV ._ ^PG Jr6 q AE Nq I V ` D AY
^L
ti F S _ CL• O/ b O � • ^ �Y G L V A
NbGi C > O yV�O V C_ Tom^ C✓— NV _ � 4!Y+Y A
C o y✓ � V V V� P A O D T l O•N C a 6 V if^ C y V i L V
V � u.�= 6 '� G — D J VV L O.VP la«r •+[ V `N V+
A V
^ OC PAN V LpW-AA SCV9m all C ` Cb J^^ = Jy S! TL OY
c si « a yid Puo c L 000o L o—=«'^ .Le vME a Div« Nwa ! c.' n.L. ayy oc
i N > J a 9= E W
J q LY•
` xI� V t N N? C >� j C N 1 �> ✓ V q w✓i a H G d 9 Y P G</
i V G C E •• 6—_ C��P O O•! d� V d O V O V A O u O �� V V
V" N P � NN eC!! '/cam � f T A yAyO pl Cc V
^ Q` V D • V!C C VN G C L_A V A >.a 9 V O q • 6 p. J ^
V N
V 4 O q x O c D W d N..�. n »Q G V _ �� ! A N --6 V = S 9•�
rLN �N �� 6P��M0 O•� O P C� LAG_ C�� rl� A � + e NO+
•nN L ^ A E A vy^ m A
3N! L G N A M Q M•� Q D Q N S N V b Q A� C 6 Q �yY! D Q^ J L 6^
1 a ou Pab -. -•ar.ce ea•T. yo79
L
Ct
s Ln o E P ycl'n E
L Y O V P N d o T b ✓ E
q L g o v
v i i E.O• r t J f O q ✓ a p N P �'^ P 9.�+ p O r
dcm 1.0 dqq`^ Dr0•r Vb•L.•w•D� A
V b D u N V t C J 9 u •Jn ✓ y Y E O y y
a r C O U E V Y O L Q A m O C p D S L =L r✓M q C
ly 9 A nN V CE
P V p O J Y U.2 d O^.VL T✓O y V � ✓ I L N C� � O
A. A Q q C Cy 9 b r N V i^ I d 0 0 d r A✓— 9 I
'CO DA Aw•q P ad� 0 pp0 VANOY -• y yf„qNP` OL
PI 9 � IPrC � CUCOui y � r. Lb pN
b O Z L 9
A > L rY� CgNY VqY -1 tDq p•VrD ZDpEO.O E rN
C £ n� V` ` C O✓9 N A N L N C L L C T `r o C L G w..C O 4 c= q
O V L L � y 'e d r L `L u � S� V y V,� N O Li+ •.r a� •ef T q.yoi DY c� a >oE y�r •Nny L�q a
`n ua c wc :•.e. oN opa oo.pye �aV v= -cE'6c dT
pu rA q9r � •nOdL qLd hr dNCO q Eq
ZZ
D •Li•Y N b q N Op r `^ C O S r n G�A q` C q V T A E N
C Y Q y O d A^C O�� P N.^✓L nN� Y q PD V N O V D V D
A� Y O N Y D W^ • � d � V� P E C L V^q d 9 �C
Lr W� pY 9.^ N rOgN VO< q�Daf �� POAG�� � 9r
N C O n l Y r d a y S •r N L . 9 9 G D C N q E L M r
V ^ N C P_> V InO O v q d a y •d.• q
4� qA qp� P E YL d0 VYCbPA Cry �•„�b`r CP r CC
Ld P O� C Va�� OVL' � agD� j r9^� NNG✓- E� L 09
uA � Ur P•� 7 iV.Eply Sd9> NON TOrS �mJS � Cary d Y
q CA C d ` LL y D t O V V O P A OI Y T N 0=t JF qJ 9 NV9N C O
d POV LE`D CO
L VL C U 9 d C
6Y 6PV 6V�r0 6 q C rpl O
u r
N Al `Cf � WI
W
le
Yr � P—O P— -bo � c ca �� � ✓ -
¢¢��� O ice c^t .Pi9 O✓N� rY _ CC_
Y�ti�' �� �H�r r - •n A r YPO
O C_ � a C 9 N q C •✓ �K J J
yry pyr ^N s m D E c
Y� OS N� 9C'OLL ly l�F yV V ! O du
p ud E -c =^ Td E�Gn L^ OC me �` O Vdq
9TJ ✓ Q fir= V dv � Y9
r.OZ O 9a` �' 29� 4d lD do9 VV_Y
�r• C C) V
V yEV p-EG y N�q q YN � V� �r 9 • C
S u✓i✓VF O� Vp M � �YN � d I a�' �� i�
s a._r. aE 9q q'<�q �✓_Ov m .�-. t [y„ � C �� r D .ci
C Y.L.• d OVN ` PyV ✓ ✓ •� i .1�r OJ y Vd rN qr
PSr C A��N Oy` EYq yP m� V •ri• j Gp � y1L p
u TV= dC6 ✓NwY✓ G bY� a ! V �� Nd ✓Y =uP
E c b c
s crF .L.— 'o E K�c� oW eu y Oq zd uE o! Tq+q
aV pCV L� d� �C�m ��O_tLA � 7S E� � O Cps QUipw
�. eF zcVi�.r c'^ m.T•i vo4'ac o m � d Fc �P Or�n
_ •^YS q L a d m c or'
4C `O = OL �� d_VW J O✓r 6 � •d•• rL Y.^ V •9f�
�.^y ✓ d J qY r ✓ yp N _ E6 V_✓ J O'• Cyy O�C C .O ✓ L L N✓ .r V b P V
C V W.� Li� q 9 D Y A�6 O C V j•V � = C N= �� J D D O g 0
V 1r O lk' TDr V � N •n.^ yL MVCV
p°' ao = aLta` OpV�r °' am -E w a9 ....c OZ r•or P•r
✓ S V `✓W e n d y N G N P O T N V C V
y 9 ✓ •^ d goYEO Na��p N rC Cn nG Cd L=� O
I O 9 0 E C N Y N a g - N n V r I p O J ✓r n
N Y ^ � b.Or Y�r NE yM r' N� d y � u JP NU �E OmNT
t. C t y L _V. C O O C •✓i•N O g
c ENO o= V_ VNr r�wEq r J, � 9� � P� .JO P � O✓
q �G VY YI r 1�99 O N C ` r � q� r= uOV VC q��.L.•
✓ V{ ^_ I ' 09VP �r TY �L Cp`9 ✓ yI OrJ ,RNE AO C �7 O.f
C � O^' y LC J p N N LVD O WVV � 6
][ L1rN6 � VW 6J6D�rN 6� 9
I`4 f
� 7 Y
=l'ry
I
� ✓L L
^ V V ..r A✓ � r O C V V A P V V d / r Y
O 2G I I I C'C. Or =APO
4� D,r O¢ u9 ✓ C n p
y G✓Ji i 'I I V V u G 2 i� N E t u C `1�
A S •' A E _N i '
• _ Va� .o� Lr rLr ✓G r9 nr S
n19 i
•Y n N O q L d A i P(T u ✓� A � r 'n
1 ` � i V T 24r.�w• VT�N ^ N� U - O 4 O �,
6 9 C V v
n✓ CO S •r l ` V C S d V✓ G N
ti� I �✓ G q ✓_ J V 6 - � P N
.nJ EO^ c cEP P.Ti�V dT Ao ` P` e a _�W I ( L �JC � dw. LN OV l l .e ✓� PAD V 9 MV
>y { � � Cgpy � C_�=rt Aa�Y �V PEw �✓ TOE � tw
O J � O D y^ n� ` t ✓ G Y E V t. � I_ S N y O
NS 't9'w ✓ ' aa� 6dEN vO P6' O✓ 6d� D C^
4/L � Q a O TZ w.^ �� P V ✓n ✓�✓ � � '^c a S
6� Ear ' Lrr� d� r9 V +V r A �w
V G L T 1 r
6 r P a W ✓ > a g M r �t�� r V W ✓ L
�u a �e.T. Sa. o= ozi `✓ D .T. >� idz=: ^o cA
r 6 M V N A W r N` N L~ A G W✓N y `{"� �' 6 V O
O O✓O 6V 6^ L
W y -
N � V
{
�1
✓ A q V . V 9 l r •^ Y ` li � J
Ui0 � O O C N � 9^ •J
• O 9 ZE Nw-
P=r '^ > a.y m p✓ e
r C O O u P A.r t y J n ^� _✓ r n ^_ `n m q O
000 O V V Na
� ` C O a T D Y N C � O r S G=N O ✓O
D yE!
V W W � C� C Z O V d V V 6 ✓ l2'.'�� O!V �
t_�
_ cACA — rn % c' E -.e. �'� p.a �P N✓ ni i
✓..r wjjj��.... NEu a� i .� G >.—
'e A n o n ^ O C V r a h V O 9 v q« Z y C
E I = � �^Dn Nay r-a+ cn �o is ✓�°'
MANu NA S 9E .✓O .p
I.
A�N
Ml V O `2 OG� 'cD �Eyu � q 09_
VO � I nP �� LAP` FAO a � R9 CN Ci Mr✓L✓ � yJ
I ` = 4Cild =vc .and I _v�� E� ci
g` I � '^ doAo a—a A — Jd AL e'I oq< :$
.Oi9 \\LO� n✓nV ¢ Ur L 6VV W2 >, V
h� � 1 �� �• ^i mI P� N�i � ��
C V r
!V 0= =
9 2
` ✓q O - q 9 9
d E �
N 6 q✓ T 4 O
�9✓
0 oc tea" o _
- O L9 y C` N
_v ^ E ✓D`
o '� c
✓W C 4^9
C C 4 V ^ N Y
•J O � `Y � m j
'L N Or !NO
N _ �pc ✓� L u e�
^ L G
ca Q ✓ � o Q`p'Y
4= ^ v A 9J c9
as cr a e no d4
� m YPT c ^. nq yc
L O 9 _ C d j y✓ ✓ q✓ L
sv
4 Lan � c o a m e o m
2
b
L N
6
47
j
P V
Y N C —
4
O y V! d O 01 L O•
✓ U c � N
^ � M N LJ C .D � �9 N - ✓ 7! O K
q ✓ d ✓✓ Sucq '° � G � ^Y p 4
A •n�• d y ^ •n N
O � A q N D M q q N✓ O�� GSi V ^ P M~ J O
`` � OO O G�s06 NO✓^ O I 4 C D4 ✓ �
..•v � �yC Sj Vgye AUC d O ^^ m `
r Y C C L ^ Y ^ M Y OW d qCV C `� q0 A I d � A^ •
V •.�a O O. P`�V C ✓ 4 C w A y 4
fo
O✓_ q J y a N V 6y
`V q I1 C�V lP a `TO d�ML LI ` 4^ dy Oy �
L� � t "V c V^ E O r D O D T ✓✓ O L ^J �
O S O O 4 a G�^ N � • u q q O.^
cy � I ^�q � Y amzw- Nl� L ✓d 4E u ..
MO '•.C. �9! C l0. 4 V^ �•N J P L i G
y N L C O
N m
S.-w V d•+ O CL � q�� �CG NC m= O� �✓ � q MV
9 O m C y N . ^ U O C C C ^ y ✓
CI q V C N C-cc
O(I ��r � ODO.� P�q iV OJ I ^ q �.� � O� U4 �L. ✓_J_ ^_
V !
� O V O C O �✓O A Y L C N � � T V � L � ^^ 4
a . V_! �1 l a.^= m_ m I I L 4 O! ^C ^ C •J
_I O Q 0✓ ^N _ ✓ I y t.r J
o �
P N ^
0
t
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT t '9
< r
Z_
J' >
1977
DATE: July 27, 1983
TO: Members of the Planning Co^mission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
By. Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT" ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT aFC: DEVELOPMENT 1 Ea Te 31
REoVoi- n 8 s rr5 a
e eve opment o ,
u� ing on 1.45 acres of lad within the Served category
Industrial
Park, in the General Industrial/Rail Served
(Subarea 5), located on ne east side of Archibald Avenue,
north of 6th Street - A'PN 209-211-21.
I, PROJECT AND SITE. DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration
B. purpose- Construction of a 21,010 square foot industrial
® ui TFng
C. Location: East side of Archibald Avenue, north of 6th Street
D. parc_i Size: 1.45 acres
E. En,ustrla Zoa�anq-Trvedncategory (Subareadustrial Area p5)�fic Plan, General
F. Existing L.nd Use: A small outdoor storage area exists on a
portion of t'subject property.
G. Surroundin Land Use and ?onin
Nort - Vacant an Hera ndustrial/Rail Served
(Subarea 5)
South - Industrial Park buildings, General Industrial/Rail
Served (Subarea 5)
East - Vacant property, General Industrial/Rail Served
category (Subarea 51
rial Served
West - Scheu eral
category d(Subarea 5)ustrial �,�a drIndustrialtPark category
(Subarea 4)
ITEM D
Environmental Assessment for DR 83-15/Jaska
Planning Commission Agenda
joy 27, 1433
Page 2
H. General Plan Designations:
Project Site - General industrial/Rail Served
North - General Industrial/Rail Served
South - General Industrial/Rail Served
East - General Industrial/Rail Served
West - General Industrial/Rail Served and Industrial Park
I. Site Characteristics: The site slopes uniformly to the south
at approximate y two percent. A portion of the land is vered
with a slag base and a small enclosed outdoor storage
area
exists on the south portion of the property-
ANALYSIS:
A, neral: Part I of the Initial Study has
been
completed consderaaione
app scant and is attached for your review
Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental: .ssessmert and
found no significant impacts on the environment- as a result of
this project.
B. Im acts• Deveiopment of ti..e project. will generate additional
trafTic and increase the amount of water runoff from the
property. however, these increases are insignificant since the
surrounding streets and drainage facilities rill be provided to
handle the project increases.
RECOMMENDATION: Based upon site analysis and the Initial Study,
zs project will not cause significant adverse impacts on the
environmen for if the Commission
concurs, issuance of a Negative
Declaration
Respegtfplly submitted,
L �s
Rick Gomez
City Planner
RG:CJ:jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan,
Initial Study, Part I
o
.I•
h ..
RANCHOINK
CITY OF ITEM
NGA
• •
EXHIBIT:
r.
r
•1 = I
III - i�•— ' .. ._ R .-. ...' v�,�.L.... '.i +ii% ,
I _ 1
a
YI(ti VA.
( -ISM:n•JC l
r .�1, ( r • T�—T
y �I
t JT
I I �
I � jY1 C
a+ 1 11
i :ice _a 4 &i =1
46
w�1.r�yT
CITY Or
RANCHO CUCAIN'IONGA TrrU-
PLANNING DIVIS[�I EXHIBIT- SCALE- -
CITY OF RANCE0 CL'CP_MONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
° Environmental Assessment Review Fee_
$67.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review* Committee through the department where the
ion is made: Upon receipt of this
project applicat
application, the Environmental The pare
Development Rev ew
Part II of the initial Study.
than ten
Committee will meet and take action at which time thA
(10) days before the Public meeting of
project is to be heard. Theop ject will tee will makehave
no iondeterminations: 1) . Negative Declaration
ficant environmental impact and a significant
will be £ilea, 21 The project will have a sign
environmental impact and an Environmental impact Report
will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report
should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa-
tion concerning the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Scheu Industrial Park
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESSd.A 9�86 ONE:
Leland and Allyn Scheu
297 Stowel St. , Upland,
. TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
NAME ADDRESS. _
Juan Baares - 4761 Arrow HWY- ,
CONCERNING TEA PRO E� - -
Montclair,
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
1 Rancho -Mamon a,
' Approx_ 9100 Archiba d Ave . ,
7.ISTEgpO,THERR PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL. REGIONAL' STATE AND
1FD lding BnpaxtnentD iie Dnpa=tment; Engineering
-UING ERMI Dew
I-1
i
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
One (1) each, concrete tilt-up
buildin dock hi h of avaroximatel 21 01Cwarehouse
facility-
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND. 1QuA5REC2OOTAGE OF improved EXISTING
oAND
es to be
PROPOSED BUILDINGS. IF ANY: ib rove wi approsima e y
back portion o=• 5 .2 acres alrea y P
70, 5 0 s . =- in iVe eac ui ings
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY. PLANTS (TREES) ,
ANIMALSO ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) :
Dough grade lot with no significant vegitation
Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
Yes
I-2
i
® WILL; `*HIS�CT'
YES NO
X 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc. ) ?
X . 4. . Create changes
ingthe existing zoning or
general p r
{ S. Itemove any existing trees? How san;'?-.
X 6.. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above-.-
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the constructitn of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATT_ON-. I hereby certify that the statements
furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial evaluation
statements, and
to the best of my ability, and that the far
to best of my
information presented are true and correct t at additional
knowledge and belief. I further understand that
information may be required to bet ' eR�vefrw-%— teeuate
made the Develn
evaluation can be by
Date �� Signatulre
Title
j;t I-3
i
_-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �v�MoAt-.
STAFF REPORT
� r
OI iA
FII �j 1?
i m 19
"Lz
DATE: July 27, 1983 1977
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
By. Rick Marks, Associate Planner
IVE DECLARATInvN FOR
SUBJECT: EXPANSIONN OFL THE RAC 0 CUCAMONGATNEIGHBORHOU0 CENTER
-4A
t to the
acre parse of an south of an a face located at
existing Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center,
9791 Arrow 4ighway.
ABSTRAPT: This report tontaicond•ctedou pursuanrtatto athe arCaliforn�ia
required Initial Study
Environmental Quality Act on land purchased by the City for expansion of
the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center.
® BACKGROUND_ On March 17, 1982, the City Council determined that as part
of its entitlement award of federal Corrnunity Development Block Grant
funds it would begin a multi-year project designed to expand the
existing Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center to provide improved
facilities particularly for senior citizens. After a lengthy
negotiation process, the land for the expansion was purchased by the
City.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The subject parcel is located directly south of
an a Jacent to the existing Neighborhood Center. East of the property
is a single family house and neighborhood; to the south
west and across
Solina Street is the Cucamonga Elementary School ;
Malvern Street are the offices and yard of the Chino Basin Municipal
Water District. The property is generally surrounded by urban land uses
and compatible with the intended use. The site itself is very flat with
perhaps only a slight north/south grade. It contains ten
en (10) very
mature Eucalyptus trees along the eastern property there are no
two
residential units) and has virtually no other features;
structures on the site. No animal habitat can be attributed to this
site and likewise no plant communities. The site was disced (before
inspection) on March 30, 1982, and there are no signs of plant or animal
life of any significance. The site is clearly an urban lot, surrounded
by urban-related land uses and not on or protective of any scenic or
aesthetic views or vistas.
Parts I and II of the CEQA required Initial Study for this parcel of
land were conducted by City staff with the result that no significant
environmental impact was found.
ITEM E
Negative Declaration/Neighborhood Center
Planning Commission Agenda
July 27, 1983
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt
the attached Resolution finding that Assessor's Parcel Number 209-041-44
was reviewed pursuant to the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act, that no signficant environmental -impacts were
determined and that issuance of a Negative Declaration is in order.
Respelufully submitted,
r; �
i ;
RIDC GUM
Cjty Planner
t
3G:RM:jr
4
Attachments: Initial Study Part I
Resolution of Approval
i
6 ��
(IELL AV
elm..... ....°. �
L a _
F� AVAV
. � .�. � _ _ s ,.uw� � S . ...m � a"r„�:oast-- v Y i` •'
L�C.t a. •R S C.iY
—,1RNER�= kY^ een° &w I, YM� g �" —
� 4 MPIIC aY 9 a •�i nM _ —_—
MILUKCN
AV
1
N. 4,
1 m
m s
r
A �p.
ncxsna •Y
a0CNF4rF� � •V
a 6
{. II '•pEV
Q p►ojeci Location
s
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ARL
INITIAL STUDYqP
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00
For all projects requiring envir-onnental reviev,
thiis
f
form must be completed and submitted to he Development
Review Committee throuan the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Reviecr
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project s to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no significant
enaironmertal impact and & Negative Declaration will be
f-'led, 2) The project will have a significant envircnmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An
additional information report should be supplied by tine applicant
giving further informaticn concerning the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: RANCHO CUCAMONGA NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER EXPANSION
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELE RO E: _y_of'Ra ' ty�ervI Cucamonga
9320 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga,
lannin Division
n De
(714) 989-1851
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHOITE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Rick Marks Associate Planner, City of
Rancho Cucamonga; Bill Holley, Director, Commum ty Services epar men
t.
(714-989-1851)
IACATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESAPN 209-041-4 SOR PARCEL NO• )_
g N iahborhood Center- g791 Arrow Highway
Pro osed Project Site: Contiguous to exng "tP—
—
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND TFIE AGENCY ISS:TING Si7CH PERMITS:
NONE
I-1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJEC
DESCRIPTION O F land directly th
T:Expansion of the existing Neighborhood Center
to e South; expanac'
Ity
onto a .7 acre parcel of parkision rki g;
would consist :,f several connunity/meeting rooms, lavatories, ng;
project also includes expanding existing kitchen facilities.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT A:Z A AND] SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF A'Q`-': Project area = 7 acrTeet or u> >n9>
i Existing Neighborhood Center _ af.Te c ana;
sq.
^-- osed i3uilding Expans on - uD to br not more than 5660 sq. feet.
DESCRIBE THE —"'I MVNPAI, SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORIATION ON TOPOG-ZAP-HY, PT (TREES) ,
ANIMALS, ANY CULTUR?L, HISTORICAL OR SCZ:TJIC ASP CTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AIM THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTI`:G STRUCTURES \-D HEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS)
-:AS SEE ATTACHED.
Is the project, part of a larger prajecL, one of a series '
of cu-,aulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
Tha proposed oro�ect is not art of a larger one or one in a series of
T ro'ect may be hased over sev becomes eral aava lab ers with art
of the whole project accomplished each year as money
I-2
u` „
t
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES HO
_ X 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contoars?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
s eC.aye, etc.1 .
_ X 4. Create changes in the existing, zoning or
general plan desigratiors7
X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? 10
_ X 6. Create the reed for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous matt--rials such as
toxic substances, flarunables or explosives?
Explanation of any `TES answers above: #2 During oro3ect con-
crr -r14- like that there will be an increase in existing roi
l vels. This can be titl atea by restricting-work to sped is wor o
(7 a.m. - 6 p.m. Wee,<days) . ere s ouia nO a ary
si nificance after construction. n . ro�ec s� a n�
alns
eucalyptus trees which would need to be renove .
IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information recuired for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the Facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
ray Rnowledge and belief. I further understand tln t
additional info:-nation may be required to a submitted
before an adequate evallation can be made the eveloDment
Review committee.
Date July 19, 1983 Signature
Title City fanner
RZSIDE?;TFIL CONSTRUCTION
The folio:ring information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
PianninC Division in order tJ aid in assessing file ability Of tI.-
sch OOi. district t0 acC•o-=,odate the proposed residential 'develop^ent.
Tame of Developer and Tentative Tract NO.
Specific Location of Project-
PHA-SE I Pii=.S- 2 PHASE _ 'DH St= 4 TC L;+L
1. hunber of single
family units :
2. Numbez of nultiple
family Units: _
Date proposed to
beg_.. censtr::ction.
4. Earliest date of
P4od^1
and of Tentative
5. Bed_oons Price Range
ENVIP.ONMENTAL SETTING
This site forms the western edge of a residential neighborhood of
single-family dwellings and is in effect the transition area frog:
residential uses on the East to the land uses associated with a
major city arterial street on the West (fast food restaurant, gas
station, business offices, parking lots, etc. ).
To the immediate North of the project site sits the existing P.ancho
Cucamonga Neighborhood Center which is the building proposed to be
expanded onto this site. To the immediate South of the site, on the
other side of Salina Street (the actual southern border of the site)
is a small open field (very similar in features to the proposed project
site) and the school yard of Cucamonga School. Malvern Avenue (which
bends around the site and becomes Salina Street) forms the western
edge of the site; across it lies two open fields separated by a parking
lot (approximately 50 stalls) which serves and is owned by Chino Basin
Municipal kater District. The eastern edge of the proposed project
site is edged by two single-family residential dwellings - tha border of
the residential neighborhood.
The site itself is very fiat with perhaps only a slight North/South grade.
It contains ten (10) very mature eucalyptus trees along the eastern
property line (near the two residential units) and has virtually no other
features; there are no structures on the site. No animal habitat can
be attributed to this site and likewise no plant communities. The site
was disced (before inspection) on March 30, 1982, and there are no
signs of plant or animal life of any significance.
The site is clearly an urban lot, surrounded by urban related land uses
and not on or protective of any scenic or aesthetic views or vistas.
y•'
CITY OF RANCHO CUMMONGA
® PART 11 - INITIAL STUDY
E2QVIRONyiENTAL CHECKLIST
DATE:
APPLICANT: City of Rancho Cucamonga
FILING DATE: LOG Iv'U165ER.
PROJECT: Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center Expansion
PROJECT LOCATION:
I. E' TIRONMENTAL 1NPACTS
attached
fExplanatior. of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required or
sheets) .
YES MAYBE NO
1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have
® significant results in:
® a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in X
geologic relationshil:s? —
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or X
burial of the soil? —
c. Change in topography or ground surface X
contour intervals? —
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features? X
e. Any potential increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, affecting either or. or off X
site conditons?
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? X
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as eart'iquaces, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? -X
h. An increase in the rate of extraction and/or X
use of any mineral resource? —
2. Hydrology. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
'ane "L
YES MAYBE NO
a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction
of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream X ® _
channels? X
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water
runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters? X
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any X
body of water? _
e. Discharge into surface waters, or any X
alteration of surface water quality? —
f. AlteratioTi of groundwater characteristics? X
g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interference with an
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity? X
h. The reduction in the amount of water other-
wise available for public water supplies? X
i. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or seiches? X
3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant
results ia:
a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirect sources? X
Stationary sources? X
b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or
interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
c. Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affect'.ng air movement, moisture
or temperature? X —
5. Biota
Flora_ Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or number
of any species of plants? X
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants? X
Page 3
YES MAYBE NO
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of X
plants into an area? —
d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural X
production? —
Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or numbers X
of any species of animals? —
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare X
or endangered species of animals? —
c. Introduction of nc-w or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier X
to the migration or movement of animals? —
d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or X
wildlife habitat? —
5. Population. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, diversit;', or growth rate of X
the human population of an area?
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or X
create a demand for additional housing? —
6. Socio-Economic Factors. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a_ Change in local or regional Socio-economic
characteristics, including economic or
commercial diversity, tax rate, and property X
values? —
Will project costs be equitably distributed
among project beneficiaries, i.e. , buyers, X
tax payers or project users? —
7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the
vroposal have significant results in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or X
planned land use of an area? —
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
policies, or adopted plans of any governmental X
entities? —
c: qulaity or quantity of
An impact upon the
existing consumptive or non-consumptive X
recreational opportunities?
rage 4
YES MAYBE NO
8. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement? X
b. Effects on existing streets, or demand fox'
new street construction? X_ _
c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? X _
d. Substar_tial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems? X
e. Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and/or goods? _ X
f. Alterations to or effects on present and
potential water-borne, rail, mass transit or
air traffic? X
g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? X
9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
paleontological, and/or historical resources? _
10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors_ Will the
proposal have significant results in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health
nazard? X
b. Exposure cf people to potential health hazards? X
c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
ssbstances in the event of an accident? X
d. kn increase in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenogenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms? X
e. Increase in existing noise levels? _X _
f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous
noise levels? �C
g. The creation of objectionable odors? _ X
h. An increase in light or glare? X
r �C 7
YES MAYBE NO
11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant
results in.:
a. The obstruction or degradation of any scanic X
vista or view? --
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive X
site? —
c. A conflict with the ob;ective of designated X
or potential scenic corridors? — —
12. Utiji es and Public Services. Will the proposal
hav a significant need for new systems, of
alterations to the following:
X
a. Electric power? —
b. Natural. or packaged gas? —
X
c. Communications systems? —
X
X
d. WatE.r supply?
e. Wastewater facilities? X
f. Flood control structures? A
g. Solid waste facilities?
— X
X
h. Fire protection? —
X
i. Police protection? —
k
j. Schools? —
k. Parks or other_ recreational facilities? — _
X
I. Maintenance of public facilities, including X
roads and flood control facilities? —
M. Other governmental services? -- X
13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal
have significant results ir.:
a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? X
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing X
sources of energy? —
c. An increase in the demand for development of X
new sources of energy? —
d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption
of non-renewable forms of energy, when feasible
renewable sources of energy are available? X
Page 6
YES n- YBE NO
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or
scarce natural resource? X
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal. or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory? X
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into the future) . X
c. Does the protect have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the ?_ncremental effects of an
individual project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects,
and probable future projects) . X
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ X
II. DISCUSSION OF ENVI,,ODujENTAL EVALUATION (i.e. , of affirmative answers to
the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures) .
ks
IIZ. DETL•R"IINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
--� I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
11_JI on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
_ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
Lieffect on the enviroament, there will not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have beer. added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
envirnment, and an ENVIRON1116ENT 11-TACT EIORT is required.
Date Ju1�19 1983
r Signature
t
.• City Planner
� Title
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Soils and Geology
1(b) , Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil .
While the project site is very flat there may need to be some
minor amount of grading and soil disruption in order to level
the building pad area of the project site. Gradin5 can be
kept minimal and controlled at the time the grading plans are
apprcved.
Hydrology
Z(b), Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, cr the rate
and amount of surface water runoff?
The proposed project site is an open, unsurfaced lot. Any
construction on the site and introduction of impermeable
surfacing material will lead to an increase in surface water
runoff and change ;eliminate) on-site drainage. Some of the
additional surface runoff will be carried away by neighborhood
streets and some of it will be carried onto the open lot south
of the site.
Air Quality
3(b). Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or interference with
the attainment of applicable air quality standards.
The nature of the project is such that it will not cause any
significant decline in air quality after construction. Any
impact on air quality would be caused d::eing the construction
of the facility and would be do to construction related
activities. The impact of construction related activiti :s
on air quality can be mitigated in art by the introduction
D
of techniques such as watering to eliminate or minimize dust.
3(c). Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, aff�ctinq
air movement, moisture or temperature?
Upon the completion of the expansion project what had been a
lot of open, raw land will have become substantially, if not
completely, surfaced with a building, parking lot and wal';ways.
The imoaci: of this conversion of raw land to a surfaced property,
will have a slight impact on the immediate area's climatic
condition, particularly during hot -weather when the sun heats
the surface material . However, this impact is net expected to
be substantial , far reaching, or harmful to any area flora or
fauna.
fi`
Land Use and Planing Considerations
ing consumptive
7(c). An impact upon the quality or quantity of exist
or non-consumptive recreational opportunities?
Upon completion, the Proposed project would greatly expand the
recreational opportunities of senior citizens in particular
and the public in general .
Transportation
g(b) . Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street cvn-
struction?
The project will increase the capacity and size of the Neighbor-
hood Center, thereby allowing it to host a greater number of
functions or meetings. While it is not anticipated that this
struction, it will increase traffic
will require new street con
flows above current levels, though not significantly or to the
detriment of the nearbyresidentialaneighborhood as most traffic
will use Arrow Highway as the
rcess route.
g(c) . Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new
parking?
The proposed expansion of the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood
Center will require the construction of additional parking
facilities; the project proposes construction of additional
parking.
g(g). Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or
pedestrians?
Because an expanded Neighborhood Center will have the ability
to serve a greater number of users (simultaneously
or at
therefore
staggered times) will draw to it more people
an increased number of motor ve;0 cles, bicycles and pedestrians.
In that more people will simultaneously use the general site,
resulting in an overall increase in facilities users, the
potential for an increased number of traffic accidents will
exist. This increased potential for traffic accidents can be
mitigated by good site design that protects visual access to
and from Malvern Avenue and Salina Street. parking will be
on-site and should not interfere with vehicular traffic.
Hcalth Safety and Nuisance Factors
10(e). Increase in existing noise levels?
10(e) . Continued -
® During project construction there will be an increase in noise
above existing levels. This can be mitigated by restricting
work to specific time periods (7:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. weekdays).
Upon completion of the project there will be a slight increase
in noise levels, but given the location of the site and
surrnunding land use, it should not be significant. Along
the eastern edge of the site, noise buffering techniques can
be used to raitigate noise affecting the two (2) residences.
Energy and Scarce Rescurces
13(d). An increase or perpetuation of the consumption, of non-renew-
able forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy
are available?
The existing Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center is equipped
with a solar hot water heating system and a back up gas, hot
water heating system, and it is anticipated that the proposed
expansion building will be so designed. For other energy
consuming activities (space heating/cooling) the project rep-
resents an insignificant increase in demana for non-renewable
sources of energy.
h '
RESOLUTION NO. x
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO C'UCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
NCHO
CUCAMONGAVtN�GHBOR OOD CENTER EXPANSIONECLTION FOR 0 TOASSESSORS OF THE PARCEL
NUMBER 209-041-44
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga determined
at a public hearine held on March 17, 1982 that the Rancho Cucamonga
Neighborhood Center should be expanded onto the parcel of land adjacent to and
south of the existing center 'Assessor's Parcel Number 209-041-44); and
WHEREAS, Staff has conducted an environmental assessment of the
property pursuant to the California Environmental quality lc nt and
determined
that the proposed project will not cause any sig
nmental
impacts; and
WHER;_AS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on
July 27, 1983 on the environmental assessment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission has held
a public hearing and finds that the above-described project will have no
significant environmental impact and hereby authorizes the issuance of a
Negative Declaration.
APFROVrD AND ADOPTED THIS 27T4 DAY ^F JULY, 1983.
PLANNING COMMIS=I01, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST-
Secretary CT the P anring Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commissic71 of the City of Rancho
C ucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 27th day of July, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COKmISSIONERS:
NOES: Cn MISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CITY OF gANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT t
z�
>�
" ' 1977
i
DATE: July 27, 1983 0
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT' TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11932 - EJL
BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting a time extension for st Tentative
native
Trac--u"�i�, located on neeprQJect side
consists Finch
ter, (10) single family
Jiaven
Avenue (Exhibit "All). The
on 2.7 acres of land in the R-1 zone_ The current expiration date
is October 28, 1983.
alid
ANALYSIS: Tentative tracts ers the
withtappf Priate extensi Rancho onsa per re vthe
four
Tor a maximuM of four (4) Y rcved for twenty-four
Map Act. This tract was originally al
months on October 28, 1981, and is now eligible for the first of two
possible twelve-month extensions.
RE�EECATION: I is recommended
�ndedew thirat:cre date lve {would be
12) h extension be
9
OctobEr 28, 1984.
t .
P,esr"eYbmitted'��fRitk
City Planner
a
R6:CJ:jr
t
Attachments: Exhibit on - Tract Map
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
Time Extension Resolution of Approval
ITEM! F
K16wWVC AVC.
S iTE
F4�>•wAY G�r vJ
7
Q / I
3y1 F, e R-r 72co
R-1-7ZCo
1935 S,:
_ VIC ItfITY �,' 71"'VE �JiAP
S ALE
MGW-AKD AVENUE
1
/
p`� p 0 � O O ii
wr gNIY �r �i wM '
C.
-
8�y31
i MATH
CITY OF
RAINCHO CUCATMONGA Tm.E- -rRacr- mw::t
PLANNIlVG DArNON EXHIBIT. SCALE-
RESOLUTION NO. 81-130
® A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COtU4I5SI0N OF THE
cITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
TRACT MAP NO. 1193e
APPROVING CONDITIONALLY
o.
WHEREAS,E.JS, Tentative
licant,Tract
forMao
theT,purpose ofhsubdividin the real
submitted i ated in aPPthe
9
property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino,
State of California, described as APN 202-191-15, located on the north
side of Finch Avenue, between Bandola Street and Haven Avenue into 10
lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing
and action on October 28, 1981; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map
subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning
Divisions reports; and
WHEREAS, the Pianning Commission has read and considered the
Ena-,ieeri�g and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other
evidence presented at the public hearing.
of Rancho
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
® SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract Na. 11932 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable
interim and proposed general and specific plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of devel -
opment proposed;
(d) The es.ign e subdivision is not likely to cause
substo �ironmentai amage and avoidable injury to
humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not connVcto#with
any easement acquired by the public at large,
record, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
Resolution No. 8®30
Page 2 )
(g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and a Negative Declaration is issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11932, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions :
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1. The existing bridge over the storm channel along
Haven Avenue as shown on the tentative map shall
be removed and replaced with a concrete lined
channel to the satisfaction of the San. Bernardino
County Flood Control District.
2. The existing right-of-way at the northwest corner
of the cul-de-sac at Bandole Street shall be
vacated to the adjacent property owner.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981.
PLANNING COTMISSiON OF THE C. Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: �
r
J frpy King Cha n
EST:
tary of the Plaani,�g Commi=lion
I. SACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Corn<nission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 28th day of October, 1981, by the following vote-
to-wit:
COMMISSIONEPS: Rempel , Dahl , Sceranka, Ki ng
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ASSENT: 10,.1MISSIONERS: Tolstoy
L.-
d
N -
M
LJL V yC iCq -
G' O Y J j r 0 E G• � y � A C 7
G 6 a l � � C V J � O a '-�T M w - S � �✓L -_ � .J•-G r
r G V � s � C ✓
d n G V r q J V ✓ r G- Y _ ..Ti L T G V G ✓ � r 7
A ^ S ✓.n r � ✓ O - p ✓ Y
•• a T A .� V C-. 0 Y C. O V L
✓ d C L-+ _ d �LVC �_ JC ru � rP_ A+
rL - J D «C,6 SCl � pT lTV ! � n
_ � o c- v r v-4.r c r = ✓� c o n `�o c� a . -_ _c
J� O O C A C +• _L
>O �✓ n l � f M « C? V 6 p u �-- E G V G � T =` >a 4 G ^ _V C � q
_ O V C✓ t_✓ Y y u J G ✓ O✓ «Y �
C 'd• C O S O O -O C u V w 2� O C O U < � G n �J -_ E_
O S a J O � r 4 ¢ Y 6 W t "a < P y✓ V L=V p E
D ✓ c J d o ML. moo - o-.0 4 a
O O t V� r 2 V 6 A O L` •V.r 0<' ✓ C n A C
w r V C Lr � J L w G r C O G_ T✓ -6 C C S G O D L _ ✓ G V C J J r ? C w
. J u C C V C Y C n r•T 6 O V J C V S� O O r L� > L C _�L C 4
Y _Oo w ram. u L E � O ✓ ✓T � p- r pLi V� �n a_ ro cM - u SL M c =r +ryir SV y�C TE auL Uc� T C� Pw u
Lj "fA 7- OJ � Yl � TA TO q'_O-✓ � SJr �L E '"<
C V L "• 2 O 9 V C C U E' l+
LG A Jy � C T4dS <L � O L'a « 4D � O.
✓ G-
qC
G N6 G9 HO N GM W YS Y• S u ✓ rrArl\ rY Y2r - O �: rV-rn Y GO 6
n
d 'r
C n 4 S✓
o
Li
a
W_ _ C E� � L D ✓ � C^ p
1•> c Y O � o �- -L c d-- c o d � - A r
C 1 pu
1 > 6 _a •aCY <� o �v� a� �J e c
✓_ .. w Oq e.�. i.�� - �?c
c o U O po �- rG Z� ^-o a•'. �.Lo.' p .o.� o>� oa _ ✓ y r �r
ti = - _u >6 21 +• V « C � G Yam- u
-f�1 tL !2 n V r d ✓l ^ C C O < �� A C 9 F A O 'G G O P O O V
V N O 4 d d C J d =` Y r C w A 6 ✓O Y -q O D `r r = d
ZS
M Zn, O }, ur pu _OC D�� S2 �G✓ r� C � n T
�J{ � ` C' A� OV .n dG �.JnG �� t-i>•L•r C94 CV -n n0� " Y = �
�r � r• p V L A ✓• w y -J a L d L L � T � r V G r' `� V✓^ � c ✓
O � � � .•. '� c .> ✓v A wow .Y. a caD aoc � o E `o ccue y � c
7? E o = n„ n m a > c�i L o 7 9' _ �r c n N � i c-
y
C o _ �- .�. LCL -� YP� ` G �P a-o - Z "•' .oi c �'
<
_- r Y C^O ,i A •U••_Y V V r O - _Gam'" "
O LLII tj � V > C V n � ✓G� L Y .A-• V 1 r 1 G«Y 1." u A O '�O L• C_' r G r
Ank
V «G O C O 0= G i O 2 ✓V _ O G < C = �-� 4 f n
`L M r .. r r✓ _ O r>G « l �<' � 4_ V t^W <�✓ w rL
+ C r O Y
l�
G
p L VC
IN �
c _
n ✓ ~ C C p J'- q � � I C V C
_ n cJZ 44L' G _ r CV
9C � G L- V � L � � L9 -_j •.� i LPL C' lL- V
• C O Z l".i � N r r L q � ' L I S O ^ C V •` N V � i. L O Y
. _o q p..q u4r.. Gq Go c4 c .• ' ` q c :�= z v _' `- _ _ c+
`'=P ^6 !L V d V� j• p N � � I � i' l r`_ O O 4 r O N - u
•V-• ` C d �� p � L l _O Iq � _ � N �r r��
417 N Y ' V - C V •I O I w G V U C^` `
: r
i.^irC 22 .L.. i
iO T O •_. Z C 1 .2 N ^
_ JD M •drN' rr_ l OC � N CL 7L0 y I D CVLr •i+ L.a
OCq do.Y.. 4c o yl dI i � r oid Nn c G✓ TN oLN
Sry ON qq,V GVq N V Cf M) rC r r r oN LOy _ Ir Cq P F: GLr O'VCq
�cn N c oc o � �• o�
w _
CC? N U..we i�'._ VO. CN
ti _ N < .� Nr� 4Td Cnp �q � OCR O .rpi 60 � FJ r �q •nO /i�rV F�NCG
O. •� r N O .-. N V •O
W �
N
qc c
_ o �
G
+o - •� v L c c+
= o ar �o _P oc - � 'uq .•� G Noq-• =_ Lc^co TL+ +
+ _ 6 •..+ CLC N = - VO V NL^ v^+ Gr _ L L
_ - -_ N
OC LN C+ 4_ L _ ^ Nw P '^ C •f0O
i+_ N✓1 rF q+_ J Y yLy C T��Orp4 VU � JO
dC•✓ NS qC GNr CL rC f � + qZ- �C L` GL'V C C SN j
Lv L qC� �V L JC O jp � P L ✓_ C'N_ VG T +..n
o_ �� o Nb rcca um _^.oiq� c __o cc V'�•-� ri E-r_
�_
CV LJ VqL r^J S+J SO ` aU_n O i _ � L_C r V 4
v V C 9 xi V d V O A M C b u r r N '• P � �y C M -L G + Pr
N r G q G r O � y O L N Y C p L V •�O d F C r D 4 N C V �•
6O NY +N✓ gCVP ^N� LN L >CVp ^ ••4+ + G w
L. L � d o L -+ .r� .- � i -..+ c 4 0 . c• z o P c -+ -.� u
O '✓ q L V=+r r C � C+ V .4,.•� 9 �+UL+ OGr.n T r j
�
S .
r p �� 6 QN iY Nr.-6 �.VV 5J CL ,'•+OC C CYV OV'+ c -aoio
� Ey E � •"' GP `+ G^ 6 M q C C ` ^. L+ ' G'
O Ld qv✓� E +9 �C ri
i P r i Oq rwrC C� L_ .i. 6pV O_ i LO •q•'C c IyG
V pC 6 N ✓T •L"4s+ � O - V9r Ly r-Or pr. qV q dp_> r>GrC Gt'.f qV
>p U b _ � Pl C6N LTV .9pw N9 Y G
+ O V i L YC6L + O '^ G - VN O 4N _ GrOCV -L 9C
q N C q O q L L `' O •".L r_ V L1 i r L _ _ + +
Gu O 9 U •Ni. _ l L P� u p - CpgV 'ri0� -
c
l N G 6 qu bypN V_ 4T6 qC VV d .n9 rL� p<+ •O.'pr Ste+ � >
q
4 Y _ V .r• r•+ 4r N N V � 4 . q O L G j •r' _ L Y N � V
N yrJ ,p. q N -� L CC NN 'v C. u O rO pr MN'`_ •_ C d C�
T .Ya Z� P L > � cCd N.VruV rc VO��J-� ui ev �p o` So -i•_•C sVL
q_ rl = V qOS PgO6 V= rr Z � C ` V i 6q V tC T ^NV V V M w u O G C 9 � q r 4 'J _ V •'� Tr = L r�
_= Y r ✓ N C.1 -L P C,i L r C C p CC L N f•C .o _ - V L C • C
PN L O P {rV �• ~--✓ r r •r. 4L ` L ' C Nor-L•- > GL G�.' .• 1
Cy
Ca O CI 6D u6 Orrp qV < O. ap CPCNwE- oG < OL..
.". � M .D 0 Q• y Y ^i � N .p � � O
• � I I I �i i I p� �, �- � I � � � � {
_ V
•y � J C
I •n � O
V C C c
2 C
_ — —!G'• f r C+_c c C r L t y L .. ... O _ G V L ^
r 4 ^ d c. NG TC � CLN C c a`Gy < t = ' I .r _l^C . =
CP= C - P VL G y`G 9iC rGC ` N 'N VC' G rC OC L � � ryq� �
-rG a `' - pc C ° am quo L=' __ o :•'A �c_ � _ _a_ o� �'�� ax S i - -
„ `. u �c > L u .'...'. p \r.. o cr rp.." J�.✓On v _ c oF- L10� ... - � c r
O G� C c G 9 O U G r� V � •f G t -f G"^ Ur r C� I. Rnl � C.QI 1 - .� l
_ - Y O G r_C G P _M V V V > O T O N r O L Gr- I I I � 4•I-I I J ^"
9j Cr C' V'< <�� pGr VOC•�-- ` G Vbr pa P� Or xif ` r
- � O p C�/O 9 _ O •. G r �' V(� G V O J C L� I C
Air TL, � V a [iO ` T + •O�CO VU C '� GT rG0 ... 9 _ 9 � - L
0
pca L 9_ � �' o .+u N ✓L c ,. rr _ m op yj _ N`
G W _b L A C C r ti+• G b L I V G O y- d _.-r - � _ �
q n. 0 9= V 9 .r O V N✓ 4?A G L n^_ ._J]^.p 9 -
p V 2.2
yaq pL ..•�-a > >o L _ L I is _ .o
...
up CP 00 � Lr 11fC P' E ^ pO_.aL uI L N(� f�f... V O 4 ^J
V V =r y O --i O � 9 O V _N N .n O L {a_ _ '�I C C obi � O r _ •f t
CC P✓ NO �a CPS G . V- Cps L V P� rA � 6 Cp Vj-�
VOr V <N < 9 rIJ .>n 6 9 A V p V ^• C O O .ri. (�j V K V I C Or
L V_ T V G _ O 9 q a O C\r r G r • _•= � � C
-
- i U.0.. �_ � O _• =te r 9 O r .:J V p0' V T l -- r =9 S ' - V G O V
CJ= CO
G
.On c.- u 9 V r E c CO- _ •n L
�_ GOB _ ��- •'�� OdY CVV V, VLL V L
=� •.. >� G N y n 0. W _ rrC - CU Ci r •'• - VJ_ C^_ 47
u 9 _
cirA
Grr z ✓ ^• OP Oro 7-• jL NO brN O ` C ` .n c7 pL
r > �^• O » 4 V W V q V � C V C C r P � >N .[ >
9 4 V L _ EL 6 ^- > J •O p O r J JL V ` O > L P L TJ
�V.
p
p V O L G= .V+ 0 9 �G�L O_-p V V G �£/ O L r`` b G r• 4 l
r >4 G V N >C C C p P_ F r L y A V .n T v L £ C✓U 5 C p
6
rOd V_ L� Op y� lL AP O ` AAC N� +A`J[ VP9`
-r N'• OJ -__r pp� V 9C� P _ V �� �09 LJl 4 ` A � Gr_ OO NV
C-CLV - VV-V Aa�q GC OI LO.p �_r = ;=O
aJ
O � 6^`•a,3 _i ,+•a9 "JRNF p = ut i ` rp
69 _
-
L V r N T L C r C-•r V V y N O L O N J V v �r� O y 4 V r O G b C•- S r = 9 - "n ��
G_V rr0 OLr L =_i G�r� - VO Ode N VC VrrJ w NOV - rL •-_
� Gc�rvwGC CO NL�� � GY r r � G6 NE`� a• O.r 0`O. ON +V CL C. =� � G.y
✓Op 90 SY >� r � V9V � H V � �rru �JrrV J-CV LSq 4C L ` V
�ppV VVrNVL L��9 > V00. V 1�Lti �C� O ��G= `L� .G.rG .._ � P 9 ypV C. VL ['aL � >•
-
� 51
C 22cV 'Lr-PO4 r ` y N
V
m P LI r N O N b A �51 - N
;v
Y V T
O
_ V C� � •L]
O� L q C V u ' � -�O P u ( G ` v O � I V J C V �� r C O a0•j V C C C � _ r � �_.Ti u W f' u tt r+ � •a � C'O r q V a. r� �u
p 7� C l L V q 1 L. �-- L w t r n O «` V in 1 •- O u u L .�
cv cn= ou W =no `o aL. �.. L,•"= .ya « I �� o~ Z;
a L Y j
V _ 6 e`i i n� •Vn_ - � L T � C p V c V � _ v « `L •a `
> �- q` Vl yP - �� L OD � pu In ttl � •'� [� an � �
C q « q9 G u2:J 9Y .Wn d �• •^ O i I Ou N -� � •LnJ
C� � O r P « « �� .0.. U-i'•' � d N o V L q ` Ltli J
ry
Tr C « d Vim•,. OI LP .On (y,,� p Cu9 r V PL +«l + �� � O O y _ W O l0
a •^ y C L�r t q C l G9 6 q u ¢¢ J S W O C'tl « �' I ` T -J - u J .Ti P V SC V9 G.0.40 ^ 7 � r�u < 6« GM �L �a�I� .emu I I � L -� •� '� C y-� >. +
'�-
Y
O f
« U
c L
E
� � W ��- r W6 V •w C �ar�- IQ� ` �� dVr_ �r C � ` ���
•yO D qC r « tly �N •� I IJ TVN GZ:« Tw EG 7_ � TI I�I I I �J �Ly O-rC 6 C Ov_ Cu
00 O C V ^4_ V• J
.:�� (s c ?= v L e oars v c � i vov �`Lm �'�� .". 4� •E• � c�-s
`� Vy �y « V GL CUtV� i• l0' j r P
O _ Cd aW -_ <� C O I �•_L WIL+ u - P� L cu
�4C q_ LL rp •TtW « _- y.^v•r yPC « i yC V
cv
�� •," c r i � .2, xa`o- J I Ir O- E..o. �'aga+i cry i '. c V ioL o. -
v
W y
uri c�zu`
S L L O•C C_o > u T > Ii����_ C o S a U o I 0
.-.L G C O _ 0^ L = V s Iu Y_It �/ I1+11 II LL (. g C•n C P T u+. ` Y.O ' ^ `_
.LwLV 4-J •nV Yd � nr 2 C ' IT 1-- � 1 IWe PC qW L CLV u0 LV
u r .n •f ` V ... C u L 1 L V ✓q p q •L_ L u - J -2 4 L
P +V.o•'r L> «L.. uu P� E� E ` � n�ru
«q ' q .n!•'. ` :J� 1 � ` ' Ilr�Ny 04L LL G= - P4
Pr J N � T — I•-��r L T�i L -c— `u u3 ii� - � c'
L G t 9 L O j r. cL yI1
�✓�'c`
G V r L •v C O' W Y C I V a0i i < L V� - f I �l- L,V L V� V `` « � �•� W�� 1 4
N
v
ray Y
o
Lf)
v
j C L O V
4 O l0J V C r O � 6 .'•✓ C O �V 1i rC- G..i C
r L V " � S N �.•1 O c 9
1 O LL
4 C
O :O
V_ O V O
.-j4 a.n • ' L
t: � -G 9Fi rpm V G V� ` - - O'• A GJ Vr 4 _ q c� C V
= dr.,Lo_ c •_n E. V P..� '° � •. _o dc, c•-i -=co
R
•p �I .� N Iq N •O w
%xI
L
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION,
PITHE
EXTENSION
FOR
AVENUE
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FFINCH , WEST OFTHAVEN2AVENUEcD
i
WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the
above-described project, pursuant to Section 1.401.11.2 of Ordinance 28-B, the
Subdivision Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the
above-described Tentative Tract Map.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following ;n ings:
itions
A distressed marThat ket climate fornresidentialy project. a
B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory
conditions make it unreasonable to record the Tract
at this time.
C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval
regarding expirations would not be consistent with
the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
D. That the granting of said time extension will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,
or materially injurious to properties or improvements
in the vicinity.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a
time extensionTer:
TRACT APPLICANT EXPIRATION DATE
31932
EJL October 28, 1984
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1983.
PI-ANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY-
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary OT t e arming onan�ss�on
Resolution No.
Page 2
I JACK, LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancha Cucamonga, at a re9therf�llowin of g voteeto-witing Commission held
on the 27th day of July, 1983, by
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: '
C
l�t• -
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT � t
OI
} Z
F z
Uil 9
DATE: July 27, 1983 t
i Members of the Planning Commission
T0:
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
By. bdn Guleman, Associate Planner
SU3JEC7: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT
-��`S-IEVER - Review ano consi eration o a focuseo
Environmental Impact Report 2 'lots on prepared
86 53 acres of custom lot residential subdivision off 8 8
located on the
1061-411 03;north106'1-451-01 m 1061 171-p side of Alnd Street at Beryl
l
I� PrM- h attached
Draft Environmental impact Re
ort was
impacts assocatdwith the
to assess environmental
proposed Tentative Tract 11526. in is focused EIR identifies a
number of potential environmental problems and oblemss aincluding
mitigation measures to COsnter these problems,
and fault
alternative project desre prepared o locate the ns. Ap addendum CucamongaFault (a
investigation was also P P
copy is available in the Planning Division offices) .
The UR, prepared by the City's consultant, Michael Brandman and
As containing
sociates, is before you tonight for your review and
consideration, along with an Appendix (Section 11.0)
I comments from the general public and interested agencies. In
addition, the draft Response to Comments on the EIR purpose of bethe
en
attached fos• your _review and consideration. The P' P
Commission's review and the public hearing is to:
a. Determine whether the EIR adegately covers all areas of
I reasonable concern;
b. Determine whether the mitigation measures proposed by the EIR
effectively mitigate potential adverse impacts;
ILd.
C. Recommend changes, modifications, and additional reasonable
alternatives or mitigation measures to be incorporated into
the final EIR; and,
Identify those significant adverse impacts which cannot be
avoided if the project is built.
his portianalyzes theidevi to elopmentiitself the EIR. The accompanying staff
ITEN\6
Pace 2
II. ANALYSIS: in general, the focused EIR addresses all areas of
concern identified by the Planning Commission.: geology, soils and
seismicity, hydrology, biota, transporation, land use and planning
considerations, and public safety. A summary of _the key existing
conditions impacts and mitigation measure is prove a in Section
Five aiternatives to the proposed project are identified in
Section 4.0, including a large lot (1 + acre), cluster lot, and two
conventional lot (1/2 acre) layouts are illustrated.
Based upon the EIR analysis and mitigation measures, the applicant
has revised the tentative map to delete development on the east
side of the canyon (similar to alternative 4.5) . Tnis reduces
certain significant environmental impacts associated with this
project by:
1. Eliminating the grading and fill work in the canyon to
construct a road to the east side; which will
2. Reduce the potential for flood hazard due to erosion caused by
the "dam effect" of the road fill ; and,
3. Preserve the cul-de-sac character of Almond and reduce traffic
impacts by deleting access to Almond.
The most significant environmental impacts are seismicity and
hydrology caused by the presence of the Cucamonga Fault and canyon
drainage area. The potential exists for faulting, ground rupture,
and slope failure and erosion within the canyon. Exhibit 8 shows
the location of the Cucamonga Fault and illustrates the recommended
habitable building setback lines from the fault and canyon ridge
line.
III. UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS: The EIR is required to describe
siani scant impacts which cannot be avoided if the project is built
(Section 5.0). The following is a list of these impacts and
proposed mitigation measures which reduce each impact to an
insignificant level .
1. Geo•ogy/Soilsi5eismicit
F o gate groun s a ing can be anticipated at the site.
Mite ation
Require conformance with the latest (1982) Uniform Building
Code.
EIR/Tentative Tract 11626
Planning Commission Agenda
July 27, 1983
Page 3
2. µ drolca
oeaing and erosion hazards can be expected at five
concentration points, including Beryl and the canyon, and
short increase in surface runoff caused by construction
activities.
Miti g_ati�on
ect�ion 3.2.3 describes a range of mitigation measures for
surface water runoff and slope erosion.
3. Bialo
Removal of existing trees ,id displacement of wildlife
currently inhabiting site.
Mitigation
Existing eucalyptus windrows and select mature trees will be
preserved through lot pattern and individual grading for each
lot. Wildlife will migrate to canyon and foothill areas.
4. Land Uses and Planning Considerations
Permanent removal o, aSil" tuna productivity, alteration of
views of The site, and increases in traffic, dust, and noise
® during construction. activity.
M�t� at ionviews of
RE is p anned for resioantie.l development and construction.
foothills will not be obstructed by
Construction activity will be short-term and limited primarily
to grading activity.
5. Traffic
Increase in traffic volumes on Beryl Street.
Mitigation
Anticipated increase is consistent with Beryl Street'
s design
and function as a collector.
6. Public Safe'
increase resu
potential that wildland fires will occur as a lt
of development encroaching into high fire hazard areas.
Mitigation
e Footnill Fire District recommendations, see Section 3.7.3,
have been included intr project design.
IV. FACTS FOR FINDING: The EIR has been prepared in accardance with
the Ca itornia Environmental Quality Act guidelines the adequely
addresses all areas of reasonable concern. Further,
mitigation
Planning Commission Agenda
July 27, 1983
Page 4
measures proposed by the EIR effectively mitigate significant
adverse impacts.
V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item haE been advertised as a public hearing
in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted and notices were
sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. In
addition, copies of the EIR have been available for review at the
branch library and Planning Division office. All correspondence
received to date on. the EIR is attached in the draft Response to
Comments.
VI. RECOPIMENDATION: It is recommended that the commission review the
EIR and Response to comments. conduct a public hearing to consider
all public input, and make any changes or modifications the
Commission feels necessary to complete the information within the
EIR. If after such consideration the Commission can support the
fats for finding, adoption of the attached Resolution certifying
the EIR as adequate would be appropriate. The minutes of tL.his
publir hearing and any changes or additions approved by the
Cor;olssion will become part of an addendum to the printing of the
;'final EIR.
Respettfully,s itted,
Rick So ez
Cii" Al nr.er
r
r
Rd:DC:jr
P.,tachments: Draft Environrental Impact Report
Draft Response to Comments
Exhibit "A" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "B" - Recommended Building Setbacks
Resolution of Certification
y..
�1 1
f '
DRAFT
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL CITY OF RANCHO C C MONGAORT
TEHTA1iKF TRACT NO. 11626
Prepared for:
GI'fy OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
f;ommunity Development Department
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Prepared by:
MICHA2 BRAA DMAN Sky Park Suite INC•
Irvine, California 92714
May 13, 1983
c,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Comment and Responses` Page No.
1. State of California, Office of Planning
emd Research (State Clearinghouse)... . ..... . .. . .. . ..... . ...1
2. State of California, Regional Water Qualitj
Control Board- Santa Ana Region... . ...... ... .... ..... . ...3
3. State of California, Department of
Transportation - District 08 .. . ..... . .. . .. .... ... . ..... . ...6
4. State cf California, Division of Mires and Geology
San Francisco District Office. . .... ....... .. . .... . ..... . ...8
5. County of San Bernardino, Department of
Transportation and Flood Control .. . ............. ..... . . ..10
6. Cucamonga Comity Water District.... ...... ... ... . . ... . . ...'2
* Responses to comments immediately follow comment letter.
a►
tatg of U.alitarma k
• �: ^�\. GOVERNOR'S OFFICE
OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH
'COO TENTH STREET
SACRAMENTO 95314
GEORG£ DEUKMEJIAN April 28, 1983
00 V UNO4
,Va9
Dan Coleman �` C� " ;[JC".0 CCCAN;"ONGA
City of Rancho CucatrAnga ...: :..r...? t:RE: 0P%;,EUTDEPT_
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 cp�, ;i '; 1583
AM P10
Subje''t; SCH# 82123108 Tentative Tract 11626 (Sievers la'�3'n11iL111213y41�16
3
Dear �-f:-. Coleman:
The State Clearinghouse submitted time above nal ci draft Envview periotald
impact
ct
Report (EIR) to selected state agencies for review. ) attached.Period is closed
and the comments of the indsvidual agesmcy(ies) �(�plee contact the staff from
like to discuss their concerns and rndaticns, P
the apprOPriate agency(ies) .
to respond direct=y to
preparing the final e
%&,en 1?p you must include all coimacos and responses (CAA
Guidelines, Section 15146) . iie certified EIR must be considered in the decisiom>-
making Process for the project- we urge y
oject• in addition, ou
the co�ntjng agency(ieS) by writing to them, including the State Clearinghouse
number on all corzesPondence. 1
P LV P CDLW (118 �• �•
A 1981 A hate Court decision 7n S1 review ccUmnts. Specifically•
3d 3483 clarified requirements for re`pa =9 in detail, giving reasors way
the court indicated that �ns mist be addressed ea. The responses =St show
the specific �-mts and suggestions were not accept on or �t to be
factors of overriding significance which required the suggesti s Wt must be
rejected. oven is =1st. not be conl~lusorY to
Responses to or data, scientific authority oz explanatory
supaorted by empirical oz ,be ms:st be a good
information. of any kind
• 'fie court further said twat the responses
faith, reasoned analysis.
,ent that the project is approved without a
in the Ei adequate lsi tigation Of sig-
nificant effects, the lead agency must :hake written findings for each significant
effect and it mast support .s actions with a written stat��it of Overriding con-
es Section 15088
siderations for each unitlgated significant effect (�
and 15089) .
If the project reVlzes discretionary approval from �I' 'fate agency, the Notas
of Determination mist be filed with the SecretarY for ResO=cesr as well a5 with
the County Clerk. Please con`.act Terry Roberts at (916) 445-0613 if you have any
c.rzestions about the a viromer'.tal review Process.
Sincerely,
® & '
ton Sass,&Dire4c;t0r
State Clearinghouse
cc: Re-c s Acenc r
i
l
L State of California, Office of Plaruiing and Research (State Clearinghouse)
Response: The State Clearinghouse comments are sa noted. Attached
%!ommerts from the Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region
and the Department of Transportation have been responded to in the following
two sections.
Strat'a'.of California �- —
jN.�lYt O r Ci Fi d u m
James Burns pore: April 19, 1983'
The Resources Agency
To
1416 Ninth Street, 13th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814 CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMOiJGA
i:�TC"UNITY GEV@0PdtENT DEPT.
r�?aY o i�83
From California Regiv. ;l Water Quality Control Board—Santa Ana
Regiop AM,8tSlllltllll211121314;G16
PM
6809 INDIANA AVENUE. SUITE ZOO, RIVERSIDE, CA 92506t
Subject: DEIR: TENTATIVE -,PACT NO. 11626, SCH# 82123108 R
We have reviewed this Draft Environmental impact Report (DEIR) and offer the
following comments. t
The DEIR fails to describe existing wastewater treatment facilities, if any, �
in the area and the potential for use of such facilities by the proposed
Cevelopment.
The DEIR recognizes that the utilization of on-site disposal systems is contingent
on the satisfaction of minimum criteria established by this Board. Some of the
lots are indicated as being subject to flood hazard. The individual septic tank
subsurface disposal systems cannot be located where they will be subject to flooding
or inundation. The proponent of the tract should be advised of the above limitation
and appropriate arrangements for alternative waste disposal should be evaluated.
Since the DEIR proposed mitigation of sedimentation, erosion, and runoff impacts
by the implementation of control measures specified, it part, by this Board, we
have no further comment.
Joanne E. Schneider
Environmental Specialist II
JES:kyb
- � D40
;; , 3
Y. State of California, Regional Water Quality Control Board -Santa Ana Region
a. Response: Comment so noted. The following discussion is hereby
incorporated into the Draft EIR:
The closest sewer lines to the site are located
approximately one mile south of the southern boundary of
the proposed tentative tract. These lines are owned and
operated by the Cucamonga County Water District
(CCWD). Some lines in thus pPxt of the city are currently at
capacity and parallel lines are needed to upgrade the
system.l The Chino Basin Municipal Water District owns
and operates the wastewater treatment facilities which
-Qrve Rancho Cucamonga's severed areas.
The project site is located in an area designated on GCWD's
Master Plan for "orsite waste management."2 Tracts in
this designation are served by septic tanks with either leach
fieids or cesspools.
Alternative methods for handling wastewater treatment
would include:
1. hooking up to the existing sewer systen a mile to the
south, or
2. onsite wastewater treatment.
The first alternative would require onsite sewer lines and an
offsite trunk line to connect with the existing sewer
network to the south. Also, as noted above, some of the
existing sewer lines are already at capacity. Therefore,
additional or upsized parallel lines might be needed to
provide capacity for serving the proposed tract.
Implementation of the second alternative would require
construction and operation of an orsite treatment facility
which rneets the discharge requirements of the Regional
Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region.
b. Response: The following text is hereby incorporated into the Draft EIR as a
mitigation measure for water quality impacts-
individual septic tank subsurface disposal systems will not
be placed where they may be subject to flooding or
inundation.
1. Personal communication wit' H.M. Olson, District Engineer, CCWD, May 12,
1983.
2, Ibid. Also please refer to enclosed comment letter from CCWD (i#6)-
- 4 -
. � t
As noted above in Response #2a, alternatives to onsite disposal systems include
hook-up to existing sewer lines (which are not contiguous to the project site) and
an onsite treatment facility. These alternatives do not appear to be cost
effective due to the small number of units and custom nature of proposed lot
development.
H.M. Olson, District Engineer of CCWD, in a comment on this Draft EIR (see
Comment/Response #5), has stated that:
"This tract is in an area designated for On Site Waste
Management. The Draft Environmental Impact Report cs.ls
for septic tanks to handle the sewage. This area has had
good experience/history utilizing septic tank instaliatian
with cesspools, but has had poor results with leach fields
due to terrain, etc. Septic tanks with cesspools silould be
he septic with
required for this development. access fromtthel street
cesspools should be located for easy
and designed for ease of maintenance and servicing.-
In response to the District's comment, the following text is also hereby
incorporated as s+ mitigation measure for water quality impacts:
Septic tanks with cesspools should be required for the
proposed tract. The septic tanks should be located for easy
access from the street, and designed for ease of
maintenance and servicing.
- 5 -
Eus>� s. Tronspertotion and Housing Agency
Scats of CdiFornio (`
Mtiernarandurn
To Mr. Ron Bass Dave: April 7 , 1983
Director
State Clearinghouse Fii, : 08-SBd-30-5 . 7
1400 loth Street 5CH 82123108
Sacramento I 95814 R 6 E 0 V E 9
' -`,FN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
From DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA110N
0.2
District 08 AM PM
7i6,g101110?11i21gyaja16
Subject: DEZR for Tentative Tract NO . 11626 - Rancho Cucamonga i
(96 lots on 86 . 53 acres)
lie have reviewed the above-referenced document and it is
adequate for our purposes .
If you have any questions , please contact Steven Keel at
(714) 383-4550.
Gf PATE �
Chief, Transportation Planning
Branch A (Planning)
SLK: amb
cc : DHusun, DOTP
File
c
Q • 1 _
califomia, DePartment of
Rts�nse,: comment so noted.
�• V
rq
I. INGRAM
D.recio,
c ,".Y OF L1 i "UCAWONG.P.
Lt.FE C I:tEtdT OEf 'i1 20, 1983
ADS f ! + GJ File: 1-402/1-00
---acts 11626, 9650, 9656
hti( ?ni
Citg' of Rancho Cucamonga 7jSi9;10j11j2j1A3i4(5i6
Planning Department x
9340 Baseline Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, rA 91730
Attention: Mr_ Dan Coleman
Asscciate Planner
Re: Zone 1, City of Rancho Cuca.•nonga,
West of Demers Creek
Gentlemen:
This letter is in response to your request for comments of the "Draft
Environmental impact Report" for tentative tract 11626 located west of the
Demens Debris Basin and north of almond Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
This office concurs with your assesment of potential . flood hazard due to
erosion impaction tract 11626 as stated in the D_E.I.R. dated March, 1983_
Additionally, we are concerned with the placing of a box culvert and
access road across an existing water course; as stated in the D.E_I.R. there
is a possibility of interupting access to lots 93-95 on the easterly mesa
portion of the development during storm flows unless duel access is provided.
With these concerns, it is recommended that a design conference with the
Water Resources Division of the Transportation/Flood Control be coordinated
early during design to discuss possible mitigation measures.
Previous comm.en_s/correspondence remain in effect and are not negated by this
letter.
We appreciate the opportunity to review tie "Draft Environmental Impact
Report_" Should you haze any further questions concerning tiais matter,
please feel free to contact Mr. Allan J. K.ie lhold, Chief, Water Resources
Division at the above telephone numb:r_
very truly yours,
B_ L. INGRAM
Flood Control Engineer
By
ALLAN J. A10LD, Chief
AJK:FRG:es Water Ress Division
Y,. .. 7 ., •.,:
® 4. State of California, Division of Mines W'd Geo"OU
Response: A subsequent geotechnical study has been prepared and has been
submitted to the City in conjunction with these responses to comments on the
Draft EIR. This study is included in Appendix A and is hereby incorporated as
part of the Draft EIR.
- 9 -
FERRY SUILDIWY
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 91111 iA P�a
7i319119i;112111213i4l5i6
March 30, 1983
Mr. Jan Coleman
9320 Baseline Road, Suite C
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mr_. Coleman:
We are placing on open file the following report, reviewed for the City
of Rancho Cucamonga in compliance with the Alquist-Priolo Special Stud-
ies Zones Act:
Geotechnical investigation and fault study, Tentative Tract
3.1626, Rancho Cumamonga, San Bernardino County, CA; by
Eberhart S Stone, Inc.; November 14, 1980.
As pointed out by your review geologist (p. 12 of Leighton & Associates
letter/report of March 10, 1983)., the Eberhart report is considered in-
adequate for several reasons and a supplemental fault investigation is
recommended. I generally concur with your reviewer's opinion. In
particular, the northern margin of the site — where an active fault
is inferred to be located — needs to be investigates: further. Also,
there is no indication that the pertinent fault maps of Morton (1976)
and Smith (1978) were considered by the investigator. Both maps show
fault traces that are not plotted on the Cucamonga Peak Special Studies
Zones Map.
Please note that, while the State provides general guidelines for evalu-
ating faults, we do not establish hard-and-fast standards. The actual
standards are set by the local review geologist, based partly on state
of the art practicese ai-ceptable levels of risk, and policies of local
jurisdiction.
Sincerely yours,
EARL W. HART
Office of the State Geologist
CEG 935
EWH:sr
cc: A-P file
10
�k,
C C
4
(;ounty of Sur_ BearRa�abo, Department of T a 1sportation and Flood Control
5.
Rinse: A meeting was held on _larch 24, 1983 with City staff (public works,
community development and traffic engineering), the project applicant and the
env:-onmentid consultant to discuss the same issues that are mentioned in this
comment. ;he project applicant considered ,he information presented and has
subsecuently decided to delete from the development plan Lots 82-95 on the
eastern mesa. 7-,Ius, the proposed access road across the existing drainage
course and the box c-,uvert in the road have also been eliminated from the
proposed project.
Regarding erosion hazards, the City Engineering Department is proposing that a
1.30-foot building setback be required from the top of the bank for these lots
adjacent to the channel as mitigation for the potential erosion hazards. (See
pages 3-A and 3-44 of the Draft E110.
- 11 -
• �� � Vicr-PrrnQrwt
---� FRANK LESINSKY
°' Sarrrtn rr,Ge+arrW Afanepo
CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOYD W. MICHAEL
Dirretan
9641 SAN BERVA9DINJ 70- ..J CA.50�G A. ULI 919]J ^ 0 91V 630 EARLE R. ANDERSO
ROBERT NEUFELD
VICTOR A. CHERBAK. JR.. :•_..drnt BEVERLY E. BRADEN
April 22, 1983
AM
City of Rancho Cucamonga �JsJQJi�J11JLi3J2J3J4J�a'a
Community fevelopment Department Jb'
P. O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: Nir. Dan Coleman
RE: Draft Environmental Impact Report
Preoared for Tentative Tract No. 11626
Gentlemen:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga letter of `,larch 23 , 1983 , requests
comments on tee Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared for
Tentative Tract No. 11626. The Cucamonga County Water District
letters of November 17, 1982, and February 17, 1983 , discuss
the subject tract. _
The Draft Environmental Impact Report has been reviewed and
appears to be basically satisfactory with regard to this District ' s
Master Plans_ However, there is one area that requires attention
and action to mitigate the impact of development and that is the
area of groundwater recharge. This is discussed throughout the
report and specifically in the hydrology report submitted by
ASL Consulting Engineers dated March 4 , 1983. The significant
reduction of groundwater percolation and recharge for this area
is nested, and actions to reduce and retain surface runoff due
to development are considered essential. It is specifically a
recommended that groundwater recharge be accomplished both on
' an individual lot basis and on an overall development basis to
mitigate the loss of wa,,er through increased surface runoff . It
is imperative that we protect the groundwater b2.sin both in its
quantity and quality of water. Loss of percolation aid recharge
capability (natur.Li) will significantly impact Lhe basin when
you consider the development of the Cucamonga urea as a 7hcle.
Therefore, we request action to aAtigate loss of groundwater
recharge before development is authorized approved.
12
1V,
t
CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT .• 9641 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD . CU�:AMONGA. CALF. 91730
April. 22 , 1983
RE: Tract ;11626
This tract is in an area designated for On Site Wast-: Management.
The Draft Environmental Impact Report calls for septic tanks to
handle the sewage. This area has had -ood experience/history
utilizing septic tank installation with cesspools , but has had
poor results with leach fields due to terrain , etc. Septic banks
with cesspools should be required for this development. ThoE
septic tanks with cesspools should be located for easy accesa from
the street, and designed for ease of maintenance and servicing .
Yours truly ,
CUCA ONGA COUNTY
NTY WATER DISTRICT
H. M. Olson
Districz Engineer
12a
;t
31
C
L. Cucamonga County Water District
r.
e. Rinse: As stated on page 3-15 of the Draft EIR, "Groundwater recharge
can be accomplished on both an individual lot basis and on a regional basis."
R%,Lonal groundwater recharge is being accomplished in a number of areas in
the Chino Basin. The following mitigation measure is hereby incorporated
into the Draft EIR to address groundwater recharge on a lot-by-lot basis:
As engineering and grading plans are submitted to the City
for review, the City may require grotridwater recharge pits
where the recharge characteristics of 'lots are optimal and
sanding water will not stagnate or become a mosquito
breeding area.
b. Response: As stated previously in Response fib, the following mitigation
measure is incorporated into the Draft EIR to address potential water quality
impacts:
Septic tanIz with cesspools should be required for the
proposed tract. The septic tanks Fhould be located f Nr easy
access from the street, and designed for ease of
maintenance and servicing.
v
r
- 13 -
it
t 1 Q
Lv
31
�R
41
./ n ,it - Q .•. ._ �'fi' { .. lip �� `:� �F � - �_
yl
S i 1
e Ea4 � �-f ..v`, �• j� �a Z �+�c F, -�� I �� 7 . I�' !4 �_
< ark � �aL �� �''//(/-�� -i•t� f �! �� Z k
�'�ttc-,-aac
sl1 a.4 1 r - fit=
l ! a _ E
"i: r_ax-'•`L =� •[T' �_� � - _.'�,_; , y Z: j34 �� �Sig _ i c� ep__ 1
2_izt
L--' o jc i� -����:� • i...,V 1 �-.ate Ir sr �. a :. -�i:' ie'1 �3 5 i33l� 3 s
1i -fit a. .'. ' t-iz '�Y;p 9iSi 1§ i" 3
6:zit 5?ti a it
p 1-` -i F t► .:a S
F�� � i .�.t t -�r—�i • i r e 1 i. 3 a -
v€ '*ate j} i • Q a, Ik � .��..) �� 0{� ■ E �' 's� i a- �
HIS
i� i."• " •: a. 1)r I�. � i [�� Sat_ y 3° y�i ..a?y!°
a T;
a C
it
r `
01
_�-- s 4 ,\ --..:� t. � -i. - e� S •- It 4. , �_
pa vi
if = f
rZI
^�". -
pia ] - _ a ♦ _
0 -1 a;
p < s
f � • as aj5 Iry)� �', >�y rr �� .j �� ��-t= ,,.` \1
'S/
cm
�a fz�e 3 r �!"� r _ a - t! � � 'T3 -a• '..a i �i .i f.l.� Q
f .. S s •r Q CD
cr
CD
14
F�0 x as=
`t ,zta
�j 1 . ■ _ I r�
te: �
'Y p : 14XV
"'ref
i
RESOLUTir,?i N0.
PLANNING COM CERTION O1F TTHE�I DRAFT
A RESOLUTION OF T"E CALIFCRNIA,
RANCRANCHO CUCAMONGA,
RONh1ENTAL IMPACT REPORT PRE?ABED FOR TENTATIVE TRACE
11626
the 8th day of December, 1932, the Planning Commiss 'an
WHEP.EAS, on for a Focused Environmental Impact Report for the
determined the need
above-described project; and P prepared
WHEREAS, such Focused Environmental ImpactAReportdela has
and p
in accordance with California Environmental 1983,tthe Planning Commission held
WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of July,
a duly advertised public hearing for consideration of certification-
NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED: Commission
SECTION 1: Findin s: The Ranc
ho Cucamonga Planning
hereby make t�°lowing fin ln9s:
Draft Environmental Impact Report,
1. That the esses all araas of reasonable
adequately addr
environmental concern.
;•,�, or
which mitigate or avoid
2. That changes or alterations have been require
incorporated into the project act Report.
the significant environmental effects thereof as
identified in the Draft Environmental Imp
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS RANCH ACUCAMra A 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY 0
BY
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST: Serre the P arming COMI ssion
the City of Rancho
and
Of the Planning Co mission of was duly
I, JACK LAM, Secretary that the foregoing Resolution of the
do hereby certify adopted by theVPlanning �oorunission held
Cucamonga, and
regularly introduced, pas at a regular meting of the Plannin3
City of Rancho Cot�Julya'1983, ''y the follovting vote-to-wit:
on the 27th day
Resolution No.
• '
:i
r,
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
1 1 � �f'
BSENT:
I,.
J
• •ic
A.
.O
1 6•
CITE' OF RANCHO CUC_AMONGA �CxY'afth;
STAFF REPORT
1 t
O I $ 17
ih
J
1977
DATE: July 27, 1983
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROV: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 11626 -
SIEVE ,S - A custom of resi entia su ivis:on of ots
on 86.53 acres of land in the R-1-20,000 zone located on
the north side of Almond Street at Beryl Street - APN
1061-411-03; 1061-451-01; 1061-171-01.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DECRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map
B. Purpose: Development of 82 custom residential lots
C. Location: North side of Almond at Beryl Street (Exhibit "A")
D. Parcel Size: 86.53 acres
E. Existing Zo�c nQ: R-1-20,000
F. Existinq ' and Use: Vineyard, orchard, natural canyon, one
Wider residence
G. Project Density: .95 du/ac
H. Surroundinq Land Use and Zon :
r ort - oot s, - Limited Manufacturing)
South - Single family tract; R-1-20,000
East - Canyon; A-1 (Limited Agriculture)O,000, A-1
West - Vacant (approved SF tract); t
I. General Plan uesi nations:
roJect ite - pen pae,c Very Low Residential
(2 or less du/ac)
North - Rural Residential (.1 du/ac)
South - Very Low Residential (2 or less du/ac)
East - Open Space, Very Low Residential (c or less du!aci
West - Open Space, Very low Residential (2 or less du/ac�
ITEM H
;i
Y
Tentative Tract 11626/Sievers
Planning Commission Agenda
July 27, 1983
Paqe 2
J. Site Characteristics: Slopes north to south at approximately a
to grade, except within canyon which traverses site
containing slopes exceeding 30%. A second canyon with similar
slope grades forms the eastern boundary. Cucamonga fault and
foothills form the northerly project boundary. One existing
residence, numerous trees throughout site. For a more detailed
description see Section 3.0 of the EIR.
� �Olotpermits tom let
K.
la h [ 00 square foot minimum size
su �vn t
II. ANALYSIS:
A. neral : The subdivision map has been revised to delete
ev�cpment on the east side of the canyon based upon the EIR
analysis and proposed mitigation measures. A variety of lot
sizes, widths and depths, haac been provided. The map must be
revised to indicate a 30-foot minimum front yard setback and a
90-foot -iinimum let width at this setback line. Future access
to the developable land to the north will be provide:' from
Street "C". To the east, future access can be accommodated
from Street "E" which terminates at the top of the existing
dirt road through the canyon. 0
To prevent flooding on Beryl, the Engineering Division is
recommending c istruction of a storm drain from the
intersection of Beryl and Street "D" to carry water to an
outlet structures in the canyon at the end of Almond. To
mitigate erosion hazard and slope stability concerns along
sides of c:>• yor it is recommena.i that slope stabilizing
devices be .nstailed as described in the EIR. To accommodate
future development to the north, Street "C" and a portion of
Street "D" are recommended to be collector streets. To
minimize disruption of the canyon, it is recommended that
Street "E" , which could
accommodate aefuturee"mo ntain-type" road through the canyon.
B. Des' n -view Committee: The Committe^ recommended approval
su ]ect to the following revisions:
o Provide a future access point to the east at the
existing dirt road.
o Revise map to delete access to Almond.
o Preserve existing Eucalyptus windrows and seltcted
mature trees wherever possible. Individual lot
grading should be adjusted accordingly and an
awareness statement included in CUR's.
Tentative Tract 116261Sievers
Planning Commission Agenda
July 27, 1583
Page 3
Tne applicant has ivicorporated these changes into the project
as shown in the attached exhibits.
r. Equestrian Advisor Committee: The Committee has reviewed this
project an reconmen s approva subject to the trail conditions
D. Environmental Review: A ficused Environmental Impact Report
has been Crepare for this project and is the subject of a
separate report.
III. FACTS FOR FIVINGS: The project is consistent i.ith the General
Plan and will lot be detrimental to adjacent properties, and with
the adoption of the mitigation measures contained in the EIR, will
not cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition,
the proposed u:e, building design, and subdivisions, together with
the recommended conditions, are in compliance with the Zoning
Ordinance and City standards.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE- This item has been advertised as public
hearing
in The Daily =port newspaper and the property Posted.
® were sent to p.•o�ierty owners within 300 feet of the project site.
Several contacted v owners ir the staffexpressed agreementrwith' ig the revised mhood ap.
have
map.
staff
V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning rommission
consi er a material and elements of this project. If after such
consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding and
conditions of approvdl, adoption of the attached Resolution and
issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate.
Respectfully milted,
Ritk Gomez �, ,.,:.....
City Planner
fG:DC:jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization
Exhibit "C" - Subdivisic Map
Exhibit "D" Grading P'.an
Exhibit "E" - Natural Features Map
Exhibit "F" - Proposed Revision
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
r>.
L..
_ CC_
11�1 all��l�l►
� ..�� ..
11 ,N!� Uliu Ila utt a:.
3 u► Ili ., �' ���Ir _� ;�� �m nl��n��
77,
.Y
A
tl .
tloth�
I
i
� s
� III
\' I
i
1 14to
t
a - '1 a
`c96
I
m -
su
q rL
CAMUZATOA
r.
'L
r
s �n
tea! • C CGS ._p�p ^� '. �r ...1 - Y > �� �_' �' :.
PA
ZI
tar
r �j3 IJl�<, jw�. r tY
lit
zo
Is
tit
{ s � / /`" ,,�,'11 �\ 1 . . �! • ; ^.. �'"i-.. `i i .e� mi e z_fig a ee 9. =c �•
< � • S - s. ' .ra... i =�� del e 1 -.s i j, :_.' t ��� )'cc 2"S�; �3Szyy � si �:
' �s.i: - •, -Zaas.� s . �' .. FI .i i !E i�2:! 5 E36 n c! zi
S 1 ) e
uZ r! ..:?�f`` i`. I ^a r g lav '•i 1 • �.''7 � � 1 I a�. 3 . isi-, � ? a °�� !
1 ` �� ' { � ... ti •, �i S � .a �;� ICI !'_ �ii? �_i` OS;- -_ �e1�
] 1 s ^:�• s
0
jai
TV odd
ILL _I �4 C i
CD -
_ YN ~ '.3-_ * - � �F/?'\ �} vrlt �3�?�b•�...l L'�s^�� I;�ww I7�o !,` y�
i ;'�_^- �_t, r' x3 _ ��� 1 xF 4f �i t ! i ' s� 'a• Ci
� 4ev ' .4 ,. .r 1 F i.• -x JIf} I„ -- � I w
ZI
Ap � � xi t. � i ?�xta� � 9 • .� i ! �� Q
a
I i 3
aye � 1�}4 i eE i 5:Is i
ti
.2 ? 5 -=ia i j� •r
41
ti
m�
� •. - - — '.— 4 , � 7!, y r .. .cr.5 5�: Ta,,{s 3�`q9 9 aj }
I � � 1'•vilYas�a .�- �',. 2i I^ Va _ .�,.�1 .a �'.7.y _c_ _-a_v a .r 3 _. w „
l —lr fe _ — - a` .J Si •q —r- .. � � e z a = � 2
LL
Er_ '-
- c v_� 3 �_ _ E__ _6-
'E'
LL
Vt
Li-
�F't��.
s-. Iq
ant T 1
r
f
� � ��( a �"� \ -, . ,.r--�•• • � _ :• i .. ! ; , -
...t °'
e
,
2 � (� � � F µ- G 4 1 ,T��S�y 1 t c�I�►�
9!� \`1 --r• lam, j ' /�1, / /F �y'„ W •
41,E 9,ltl.i.. ` ==�= /.Y �'O�y.Li:v J /ai4�riL�Ci_!'�
7
/ C
1 20,000
j �177" eZ soo s F o
ti� G� ti 6, 4 N ��
1 Z/,900 S.F- �, _ � � ; Z+,`GOSF 20,700SF.N 20,30015
ZaEOUESr,?/.HIV EASE \
2i' . '*� 05. 1 .
2
� + N 94"
`,• ; 'V� __ � moo_ 4O. R=1,nBn.
1 �yp32,za
�3 N giL•O - . 321 /�/ �
J y 30'EM CENCY F/ AGGESS
p cq 1, t;" DRA/ AGc EASE- 0
W
/u/ 13 12 a 1! 2Z,100S. ti
C g! S.
,SDOSF. a M N 22000E-N
v�j /I N J ZB,700 S-F. 22,SUO SF•
p ;,�O _ 11�STORM DR�1'/ FOR EQUESTR/qN FY/PPOSES
24' f/CE r /42'
4LMGN0 STREET CYAGeJTED PER OJP
4r
i /P P Teo FW I
P.M. � `t VC-H4CX ANA
1
M.B. 6;71
V �l
NORTH
CITY OF
RA1CHO C�;Gk�iO\GA z,T�=fit .C)�
Pt-MANNING DIVISDN EX iIBM scALE- *- ICD
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No. 11626
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Man No. 11626, hereinafter "Map" submitted
by R. L. Sievers & Sons, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real
property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino,
State of California, described as a cust,)m lot residential subdivision of
86.53 acres of land into 82 lots, regularly came before the Planning
Commission for public hearing and action on July 27, 1983; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject
to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's
reports; and
WHEREP.S, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence
presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in
regard to Tentative Tract No. 11626 and the Map thereof:
with all
(a) applicable interim e tentative rand proposed general act is t and specific
plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable
injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious
public health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative trait will not conflict
with any easement acqui ed by the public at large,
now of record, for access through or use of the
property within the oroposed subdivision.
e;
Resolution No.
Page 2
(g) That an Environmental Impact Report has been
prepared and certified for this project which
contains mitigation measures that reduce impacts to
an insignificant level .
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11626, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all or the following conditions
and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLAIINING "DIVISION;
1. Recommendations by geotechnic and soils engineers
shall be strictly adhered to as contained in the EIR
and Addendum Geologic and Fault Investigation
(April 27, 1983).
2. A 75-foot to -ISO foot building setback line for
habitable structures shall be established from the
Cucamonga Fault traces and shall be recorded on the
final map. This requirement may be subject to
adjustment based upon additional detailed
geotechnical studies.
S. A 50 -foot building setback line for habitable
structures shall be established from the Canyon
ridge line on lots 27 through 43, 82, and "B", and
shall be recorded on the final nap. "this
requirement may be subject to adjustment based upon
additional detailed studies.
4. Proposed structures shall be designed to resist
seismic forces in accordance with the criteria
contained in the 1982 Uniform Building Code for
Seismic zone 4.
5. A revised map shall be submitted which indicates a
minimum front yard setback of 30 feet. In addition,
lots 13, 14, 15, 20 and 21 shall be revised to sheet
the minimum lot width of 90 feet at the front yard
setback line.
6. A 15-foot equestrian easement shall be provided on
lot 23 to connect with the easement at the rear of
lot 24.
7. A 30-foot strip shall be dedicated for emergency
vehicle and a community trail on the south side of
lots 13 and 14 as shown on Exhibit "F".
Resolution No.
Page 3
® B. The developer shall be responsible to grade and
construct the Communit, Trail per city standard with
each phase of development, including vehicle
barriers at the trait entrances on lots 1, 46 and
76. Individual lot owners will be responsible for
installation of local feeder trail fencing at time
of construction.
9. Existing trees (except citrus trees) shall be
retained wherever possible. Proposed grading for
individual lots shall take into account the need for
tree preservation. The Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions (CC&R's) shall contain an awareness
statement that existing trees shall be retained
wherever possible, and that removal requires review
and approval of a Tree Removal Permit pursuant to
the Tree Preservation Ordinance.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1.0. An access easement (minimum 401wide) shall be shown
from "E" Street through lot "A" to lot "B".
11. "E" Street right-of-way shall be 40 feet with 28
feet curb separation plus 9 — foot equestrian
dedication along easterly right-of-way line.
12. "C" Street shall be constructed as a collector
street with standard temporary cul-de-sac. The
right-of-way shall extend to north tract boundary.
13. "D" Street shall be constructed -iis a collector
street from the intersection with Beryl Street to
the interse'+ion with "C" Street.
14. Residential lots that are adjacent to lot "A" shall
have slope stabilizing devices installed as
recommei:ded in the EIR and to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer.
15. lot "A" shall have a blanket offer of dedication for
drainage easement.
16. lots 13, 14, 15, 41, 42, 43, 55, 56 and 57 shall
have rolled entrances with a minimum of 2—foot
elevation above the flow line. The front yards
shall be graded to provide a positive barrier for
Lhe flood runoff jumping the curbs.
.F
Resolution No.
Page 4
17. A storm drain shall be installed in Beryl Street
from "D" Street to Almond Street and in Almond
Street from Beryl Street east to the natural
drainage channel (an energy disipator will be needed
for the outlet) . The proposed storm drain in "D"
Street shall be extended to lot 39 and the west '.ine
of lot 45, with adequate inlet structures.
18. Vacation proceedings shall be initiated to vacate
n � `rrrdings a merger Shall be
Alm Street.Street Upon re
recorded combining lot "Li" with the "Not a Part".
19. All recommendations made by the Geothechnical
Engineering consultant will be met.
20. All off-site drainage easements for storm drains
shall be decicated to the City concurrent with the
recordation of the aap.
21. The natural drainage course along the west tract
boundary shall be cleaned of all artificial fill and
artificial drainage barriers to convey drainage
runoff from the tract.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Connission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 27th day of July, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: '
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
t.
6
YJi.,
pr C p � .�d.` d y e ^ d L 6 C ✓ T P L i A y Q �.�q C p
` L o A� a=
D T A+r d.� q ',C N ✓ q S_ G y � O^ C 6 9V. L^ N� > q C
�. = ry �6FSd� y
6✓ ✓ Y q y L 0 0
_� =« a T✓ ' C C q l N..0. L 6
d U✓q ✓D� �; q= N La VL ^ qEL av^
u N N O t
„� VAC_T O« 9 d q� � dr Y6 a✓ «Y V✓
N N=rdir UDr 'T�aD �9 Vu Yd0 rU rC y.Wv�Dgy
N V L �'^ d L^ O. C q Y� � q✓ ' d ✓ L Tr A L r J^ N a N
«�
Dy6 NV �A Yq_r �O"S C OL � n Wd tiW qLD q^
0 0� n �O L N A L > l� O p a^ _� O C L d ✓✓C � q'o u
y O.V T✓ L r L6 O E N^ y O Gl q N✓ 6 q • J G g J y y .0 L
r y W � Q N O i L q �q ✓ N✓ N✓ � a q A G �`O C N N
N ^ N YC � � N6• �✓ N AMA ✓Y J fCL _t
p✓ CQ q yrL d C _^ DN qY✓ � P dd` d0
V N O C O�q Y P C O^L` ✓� A� 9 Z
H O C q^� a.r U V N� O N L t Y O✓j F 9 J W O�g q O
p�G 1�^' Oa LL N to 0 d JdD � �Y LG .ter
p9✓ P�O qL� NCB =L Ldy LJ y ^ w. Vq Sr YV^_�9_' O-
��� ` NS L• y9N d J A CJS WO AY � C '-aGLPA
^q ^y � O = L r� = L✓ C q v A 2 C D A.G L C d y✓
OqN J^ q.` C~ LPL �� ✓ O ✓� ^�✓ l 6 L 9 e �
d dd O O YLGN N^ LJ 9.J N�.M .� �Y Mi^ CN^Z
N ..L �O l^ C p L Z ✓O q W G ^ q e O ✓�^L
J y Vf S_L S_ L O'`✓ O.T�� L J y ` Q J O N V Z d d•^ y y 4
T=v � TN� ' NiE qC�� �L dtY �` = d� .EyO ✓ GV C✓ WO✓T�4
A y•O o .n `Q60 Y6 �6� E V c WO•Yr aON GQO ^c gOVr ^a^ O
rye 9� ) PP $ V"+P G^• Nvq VD > rC ^A LYA LACP
.+g K
i �.ve�
25
>N
✓ o vN cq_ r_Lc uo�• y Z^
o`�u Q �EPO ^ T^r r ^ N LPA L ,VWpC ^� OL✓L VqZ9
a 4A6L6 6N6D GVL•m <L 1•"6N ^ 6 F•L NC VI A � Y JM96Y P
r
✓ Q Y yy O Y .� r ��V V Y
6✓e F D y C: L O G D w W✓
4 49 9 V O rD G �'✓ � Y
v0✓ ✓V qA SG � =C`Q O�✓
'L C. gyp} �y� O d� 60� �NqV
I _ R J • O✓V L C Us a ✓_ g y g r
rY �Nq Y ^G
N aa O V A N P q V V F
��� W Y✓ 6�` E✓ y= NLr .rLpq Y
� ✓ Cc
VV..II p 4 p N
`Zo mow. "< re.oa qy' Y •p u
Y
O O nEd a=` Vc cp iy.. No9w > q ^
'C^ g 0 L p 'V y
P � G C Od✓ 4F � M D.�� N^ r � ` q0
01 cc
V <
.
_ N `V Lei O G ZOL LTLCC!, .jc.'y vq _= N Prry^ „ LPL
VVV ' G S N � d L q r N C D 6 n e w M E o O ff✓
yEo ^gD� emu:
J� « c o- oMcc
C2 ✓ �C yV >t VC
�� Cyr N =^D d ✓ 9 � �I N` s
> Ar
yI J L O
•• Gu N yV G WY Fz Y• y' � c OL COAm
1 NI O 6 O V I L 6 L 6 O OL V✓ 6 N•NF O Y
�J J �. M JO d � ✓ I I{ I
l
y Y L N==rr L N �R M m P q C � d CO P �C. n •r d�V q
'Id OE NmO^Vl ddr ~i O9 N qUr 9
LSd LF..• 2 �� > O4 •.r N GSA
npCV
V L d 9 rr N L E O p p L_L
LdO� �� O 4yq Oy pr C O N 6� dc` u �u0• y
O Yq�. �u V dL qEy
S �o g y O i c O q A T c.O.r c a u.L. •Ye gL.u✓^ y r F'y O✓ P
i — �3r ov..m_c• m yyiy c � `c y Ly — dLn - dc m�
n c q9 Ld o >
'pL QG rOirq✓NCG✓ LS P^ N rCN Ct N �s—� C
cV ^ru^ p�O A+• F
u ^ G B H
OO Ad JLY�
C a L W q r N C O O L G d A
�� a��•N.r2�a N✓� yr + Eq d �� � L �— dd
« V r L r p O C 6 c _ p q � V N r d + q� • d
y E•Vr E^ O O + LL J o q — 'V.l V C m a i o:'•` N r a y y..L.a N y
�—
L Oq yai •r =0y L + rNY a � �CCr OLO LLB V
= Vr� Oy qua NAL rc � G� NVV N mA W�rC r`q r^ 6Cq
^9 �y D Y� d N q S i d q V •'V V N a t 0�6 �V w 9 A O A g T
A — L dY• U LrYNy N✓"NW
Qai.^—�_LoL..`^Lir �.rr'u✓ r Inc i�o + �N cr+. vm "' rorcN
i O 9 l M•... y V •o�V
P9l
+ o de—arc W c c c e _cfJ P yce + .� �✓� r e
O q NCG'A O � yCC NE � N� COOV ^N w✓ OPySS
✓ dVV pC,r N � y ??O O Y�V r... i � � <'�. L d�a PPyi� b
✓ 6 �C a a ti N P C 9 — q P q y O q a �=✓ C
L e� E y•0.�^� 1 r E `2 9 V p C r > p + � i U A V I N w > y ✓L p
6 m
6^ 9p9 ir�irY i^ r��rdnL d qCL LLN�9 LLp < �[.Z�. L
9 � QyN 6^r < <9 � � <N6♦ WVNOn2
� C
o W
N�
Qa i9 N y q u ya9� L L fir OL qy OG i >L OyQO Ncr
6�N aE q MCA V a �NCn 6 •V.� $WW +CSY�� wVV�^ O
N CONn = 9 LC«y N ✓ mMEN Op2EL0 6r^ ...r
cqc � m a mcaL u c ac =« d— ocry nE.L+.Fioi v<
^�N p v ..• y Q�aL �. y — N �V is r E N s�yN c
L •.:o � a m pdL W 9 y�+/ or o_
N< Cq O Y 6 rNd94l L L P•L.rgP Ca00 ��OeVi�rl
6N p p L9 CO � L^T� G 9L yV rL�
p C d p e — a g 9 L Y y r` 9 L N.� O C✓ A y N N O a r O V
+OyQCE V r — q= OV � r cmC Vr Fina O.my^may+ O
CdC� rW N N M y i q' c �9�i—N 0GO^=N `O=
�•'� _ Y .� O f O d ^�dV �E q9y q^ IVtiC r✓irt +
rye Ll � yy ^« CO y O` yq„E �L+�O✓ yrr
9r q` VI1F 1-✓�C q ` CN^q CC VaN V 9iS—tCCCJCCC m^G O
o Y N c p✓ V 2 6 V«^
l CC9 2 > PpCd O AN Oy 4G OV L`EC VNN� V
N O C m P C • _ y if
6� G�� V�r
q6L O^ Ny 9L p C_ a� AO L' O Gya C Cq— LqC
�O V L C L y V •J r� A — G � n L O'C q q^ G p C� 6 V a T
V Oya �L CL P��a NL OLL � —LV9CVV 9�+ nr
qP >�rV V,2E Q
d C O— r V V � L L O yC q N= A N N M L•L.•� LGD y'J L g L d
• ✓ —N VC > Nv � � FL: �D N� r \9G9LLN LVNgn
V q q VAC �GN LMNy^err
d O V P C v 0
CpV V� � ^ N VOOy9 V2 C� L`G^tiG � Pm q+ •� yVC✓syV W
• 0� + � C O� ^ 09 P���� 9 — U 69UC 'i=y V CV✓ Ca� 9
$1 � C NN^�rdL L+yr ppV M
p. V✓ V N O rL mOEau '
V c m+ O r C c O r O V> >
<a—<u .LM
G � C 6E p cp0 Gc 6��N c•+^
C =
N I'1 Ip m Q
a
T�
y 9
f]a Cll LL Nb q N✓ 4� L � b n « p r �� � C_
« OLOC �r N •� F• q^ ^ 1N a6
6« P « ^^ N6d V rL w Our.Ela
O Cy qN Oz
J
GO OC GO ` u CV N=� •VCa V LW �yq.OL CTCV•
y N C N «
Q J Y W Rq« Y q^ « Ca
C6CAG P^E 4O S C ~ N� qN� �r O yY VUIT VtOJ PNO
• O ^^ p V V L`
qq C^ CEO qr 66 nLVP « 60 Ll0
Pq� q� `CC �� � = Y > Vr V ?' • a CLW q0 O.b6
OVA rCa 00 N P� PEL O 0y^ N V � ��I
N O 'J GAr la > n6 b y O QrC� F.. � Ln LTOL V
� q` q= ^ J O 6 p 6 A V Ir W E 2 6 V« V H q I•"6 n« 6
66 m O V C
LL
M
L O q^ O ^ O g C 6 G a b N C � N L A L y A • L O � aO O V
a i 2 N a pg O 6 P N n J e
V O V L q V� • C C V C 9 N M N . a W a O q
N V R V a a A O O O V V LL
L N D k 6 r L O O C L L O w 6 r q w D
O V L V =V L r ^1J
y�wa-N ON V q�� Pba N O L V.O.• � ««p V `= Jr V C^
V YPC J^LL 9 b PG NV V D LL
«.
> LOL
'r«C
r Op�Y � Y d gVr�i rV r V y6 9 Vy
N CE. .«n V_OC� PgO DTr�r C9 OV � JO C >a j •q i JYb
Ce PL ^D � a ppJ V •V p r
OC � L d C N^•y Yf^� DVS qa nl nbP Err �PN V V�qL
q r^ N vNOGV �O. W.inr q q iVG yam L•`` Nr^ N
L N L « N
_ q i OJO
o`.` o L2� L. oa Lleq PuaNe Yr .n ndL. u � Vic" o� Gryn�
��^� Nvq 1[ arNL q�OC a >� Oa NS qV rC AOr yV, Grd VV Pnd
qr V Obq N � LT qti � P^ Q qC O,A �b OCrV
y" �ODP d N AC�rr� a�rrn aV T N Myya P« C GVT
bOd OG 'w cc n M A r N rn �� nw•� q
r d� LN E a €� oao oo or^avcc �� c�en ��=� ram°:
g _ ^N� �e« c gw N
zk
NrNgN 6N^ 6D 6N ZNbP < w^On 6V D `• � a N q 3 <'�
-
�CVi
1Z rnq a N •n$ " Gv L �Lin cN � m �m >•o rG
— q ✓ .. d o dL. v r L L o
vNZWv
v t � t — � ..• ✓ m O a L � V
a � — i= a' c o_ iar �oaa Noc `mn1` c^ a ✓
r c L
o G q o ivo $ Kro n c o �➢ o v y— � ac �o q W
p• dJY 22�� a= q0 q O.L C�.�J.Cq �y
6 b Cq L qU r .•qN
— q— �QG C �y_A✓L V� L..pi�VL q V L .n CV � O
0 0 n \.c Ol d m U O O q 0 m q J...✓ G q C^ F
PI �` C q � Lq^ Nd V .N ^ qC 1t1WgN T` OL
L o Wm I ecq= —✓c coda y O `•'.nL a— p'^
n ` a— dOV ` qC Wv S^S .nYoay G.`.o .^Lo ^
Y o
�` c ��ncW.J c �o
du_J 3-
2c.V uG.o
O Z
b.o. � -oi ry
.5 .LW. yatiMc
`
N � ' ql 6l M O q— me a qJ�r 1l 2 CL WL L W p••'OL � 6 r C V N O V O ^C C^> J V b 9 U O N' q S 0 P N y✓�. q^
y
ql C.6 ^ MAY^ � 0 • - Ov m O m Nq
O qq 6� .w 6 O vVC d d LC�_ J W ` t m V C P d P N 01 t'.�.
q c � �_m T G y q L C
V P✓ WLy N dp,Jd Y +N. N.W+ Yp q�O.� NJ� L✓�.li L Oq
•. �« LJ Or- J Cp' ride > 5: bgt —
C got
Nm �OV LIFFEE qG q NVCN 6 qC G� ^ L LLQ7LL LOV VOPq O 9 VF
<✓ 60�Y 6V.r0 6 q d V < d i q .y
J f:
C
O O
NI �•fl <I �I ¢ u
9
d\\
u
WI �
1
C�1
o v.-c rn.- .ao L WL - mrn vm LP a mam
JLLyL m CI bT OG VCyC yV ON tnm C IP.r
6 � c
r OLa OmC6 �rEGP 2L2
^ 00 mC r0 O V6^
LOLL— CV O� 'CjgdYJ[ > m = �•• C9 �C Y V�
Cu✓ a .q N� 6L d — V Lyl VO O q
V=Cy3 yy=+ .ni ti _L V COa� O m� Val pE> q � VC✓
l `eJ 6 f O J•.. C b M L aJ q q q L
O .n L O a C �^ — O r • M
C
gCucO L ` r0 aV q mq
c�� d dEu 'a L OL4e a✓y V m 9m O.m ^O� O V Lw� •
1.
—
^,Z q q ^^� .n C O S✓ E O g O r 0 W y M E m C �^
U TZ^ C 6^ J r N r— ✓ O a s q
GOC .n ✓ E YI Ndc 1 O �� O „ PN O.
C—
GyC L L � dC m C�J L O rV dr � ¢ mE Jq�9
r T� O I V O W r O m'J•LL ...S�O 9 O 1 W << N � O r P
Or 6 Y W GL V C
N -0y� E6qr rCr ✓ nOVC6 a O .. rm �= VI
C r e� q r 7 0 •• C > C C � q r q� r_ J L G
Y• pW J Vq q LV qy yJld q Ll V —
U
6m.'C.r6� LSd OAWv.O. VFTL.—'• L L N` �� JL OOgO
� qy m ✓ > OG .E d NN " I nmr` NV� V
O
NOyC , ✓ EdC r Cr NV9^ .n O Vq O'G CV L^L �
N�vd .coo ,,, r � NEr —b„� a i nu _— is o✓, "�'_ u
Iz
q N L y 6 li � m TLL n„d q d m P p1L N Pr O
Ql C q •+Cq O LM C a QO JC.' O y
� O m O a y V J O� ^O p 7^u� L y� •
3 LLLN0 N ^ VWl 0_ JOCWN 6� O N 6VG WHO WVV OG 1'JOGI
N
Y >
di«( qs = oc D ` oDD«
N d V««
� o c °L' .L..NNoc .qi� b� � �mT�✓. c -�
O N P O S� 4' T ✓ C O Ny -✓
d Y
6 4 I ^t Y ✓ O•V y7w.. dP C OL N< O N
4«u 9 dP0 LW 6✓
<O L d W�M N✓ O
L'V rJ C C 9 Y J 4 6 L
i F<. ^✓ U g d P C y C N
N J I E C A R P q_T O vV d
L� L4 C � D T
yy��G' I 4 alp Lr9Yr a•- � u -C Ly �TpNY O .Oi
O< �t QLC TPl Q�4 CY Gt L C �' ' CVO 09
I P f A N E L O d P{�y E Lp ^ 4 O O q 4
Y✓^ q T D W 4 O. F L �t Y 9 �V V L A 4 9 D
d O A q r L 4 r .w O W L 9 C^
qA O C pD« O� 9.Tj U C Y C Y n V 9^Y O' N C 4
m� �/' P VDP 'E dib� • NV L9 yW C^ COY I�S�W OY CY
JL C r,W O
Y dCN
VV Y LA
Y 6 V N NO NO✓ O 6V L� WYN V 26 4A0
C A y
a
4 `
L J d ✓9^ Y
p I 19 0 `� ouLr cR w ✓= < o nwN w a
LA
D
D NMD A• r� q 6✓ O r C
f � ^ G A_ d N 1 ✓ c C N N 9_
�u
P I W E fi �O L.9G O�Q P6 � Y ` QV Ou Y
C 1 CO
C W N y=N Cyfl OF l ^ 0 C yNq =� QF.
f 4 49 i 4 A y'
6L
It
.—
v�w
w ` D -' E W 9 4 1 O U b 1•. U c y 1 O O W V c✓Y Y p E O N
L L 4 A C �•_ i > zC L i
� � O D� d N L �4 L L Lp✓ 6 y N
d C O C Y r N 6 C O 9 �✓ W C^ a O C
r L N«� Oq V^ VY VC- • � Nq V•
f > L Qa VL NN NV PC N 4
Y 4 N
N O• ^ A� LL` iC V C d ✓yd Pp f �
t u•• 9 AC 6^ V= ��� N� d {p
` LPL w90 �A K^i yCN QCv� LJ�Dr.. •p ��
^
V I L= _CL p9.- J N N
L S ` V
^ a c uL� v 4 ctwv^ 6P
O O
yy
.r I VO < A 6 LV 6Vr 6 60L W1 � V qZ2: < L U^
YU 0= N C U w
d T q O q Y
a E I
^ O_d ,
O C Y tJ L y
L O J N Y• 4
L O «O C
q F V C « Y^9
Y d6T 4q pN�
y C
C VOi D c {: NI u d d •,C� ^�
L D J G Y d
Td « O d
Nv 90 " N F'i q~a
ioo =.W.'• c o� �« «q W
a'rc� ccJ qod
LL
d
c
6
�] �d m Y •- � ti�� o. c d i u
W 9 �ti 1
Qi 9q� YYoT1 ¢ C vy o K
w r L L w a N
q
7 V m
wow
V S: i0 V �Y L1 d� L •�� l
L L �
J'� � 09 9L ELY2 ••i � ` Or q �W
pD l ��(J Wy ^ > DdSV M��Y M « • NC O.O Oy D
^� = off•` � = Wc l � qq of V, e� � � �_ d NN av
p f.u_ l 6 O y NdYd CL Nd 9d � � ^ YV d
u q ' C Vm� O Vw• O � P � Q � �Y TO 'L^ q
•,Oj •r � p J N L_ C �� q 0 P y E S W of W ^ d Y J
� V i 0= O Y� TT O.•
q= L 006 dB P9Y` u9N • VV � 9 J^ �.Yn •p.�
QrQ H\.r ! GN INJt .• ]•.qC �.L• LL lY C Y y
mum
d N�
• � W
= a
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0Y
STAFF REPORT
G �
Z
IZ
DATE: July 27, 1983 1977
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
By: Frank Oreckman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: VARIANCE 83-03 - BRIMAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A
request to reduce the required minimum lot width in order
to subdivide a 1.02 acre parcel in the R-1-20,000 zone
lccatsd on the south side of Bella Vista, west of
Carnelian - APN 1061-211-21.
Related File: Parcel Map 8011
BACKGROUND: The applicant is re4uesting a variance in the required
minimum 1-(Tt width in order to subdivide the existing 1.02 acre parcel
into two lots no less than 20,000 square feet ir, area (net). Each
subdivided lot frontage will measure 82.5 feet. The City's Zoning Code
requires a minimum lot width of 90 feet. Approval of this variance
would basically reduce the minimum iot width by 7.5 feet per parcel ,
Exhibit "A".
As the applicant illustrates, there are currently five parcels (with
existing dwellings) adjacent to the proposed subdivision which have been
previously subdivided (1960's) into lots which have the same or less
square footage and lot width than the applicant's proposed subdivision
(Exhibit "C") . in addition, the applican, indicates that sufficient
time has elapsed to determine that no detrimental impacts to surrounding
properties has occured. Lastly, -the applicant indicates that the
proposed parcels will have a width adequate enough to design and build
single family residences with required setbacks, Exhibit "B".
FACTS FOR 'INDING: State law, as well as the City Zoning Ordinance,
giv e hsnning Commission the authority to approve a variance when
es t
special circumstances applicable to the property, such as size, shape,
or topography, would create undue hardships depriving such property of
privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity. Also, variances '
may be granted when the strict enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance would jf
result in Practical difficulty or unnecessary hardships inconsistent
with the objectives of the Ordinance.
In this situation, strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
the City's 'Coning Code would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed
by owners of existing parcels in the same zone. In addition, the
proposed lot split is consistent with the intent of the City's Zoning
4
ITEM I
Variance 83-03/Brimar
Planning Commission Agenda
3u1Y 27 1983
Page 2
Code in that the proposed singlti family use is compatible with the
surrounding single family neighborhood. Lastly, the granting of this
variance would not be construed as a granting of special privileges and
is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or
materially injurious P>'operties or improvements in the vicinity.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in
Tire Daisy Report newspaper and all property owners within 300 feet of
the subject parcel have beer. not -a. In addition, public hearing
notices have bee . posted on the s=abject property. To date, no
correspondence has been received either ror er against this variance.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider
a input an elements of this project. if after such consideration the
Planning C++mmiss:on can support the facts for finding, adoption of the
attached Resolution would be appropriate.
Respectfully itted,
Rick Gome
City 4lanner
RG:FD:jr
IAttachments: Exhibit "A" - Parcel Map
Exhibit "B" - Correspondence
Exhibit "C" - Radius Map
Resolution of Approval
ENTATIvE
: .r.. ,.. PARCEL TMAP NO, 8011
'IN TAO
HE CITY OF RANCHO CUC '%4 NG
1 BEING A DIVtLiGN Of A PORTS PER MAP RECORDEDON OF LOT 9. BLOC BOOK 6 OF
A
1 1 HOMES?--AD ASSOCIATION,
i MAPS,FACE 46.RECORDS OF SAN SERNARGINO COUNTY. 57:.7E Cf
1 CALIF0:ZNIA- 1 '
I !sca+ �•v r , SANDERSON 8 ASSOCIATES
1 LWVILLF- i 1
- � Gm veers d La'+O Surveyors � ,t -
i
Ilk
1
to
�-
_Y�
�� / �.e'� � l f ( I `I�YPJ'[R7<•: f� r ; + �1 !� �p III = ~�'1'
NORTH
CITY OF
R CHC� , CxX10NGA �=
PLANNING DIV',SION FXHtiift=�- SCALE
This is a request for a variance regarding mininnan lot width and minin=
square footage in the area of north Rancho Cucamonga.
precedence for decrease in minimum size and «idth has been set in the 1960's
with the formation of four closely adjacent parcels, parcels 4, S, 6, and 20
on Fella Vista (see radius map) ' which have the same or less square footage
and lot width than the proposed parcels.
Since the formation of the aforementioned parcels enough time has passed
to determine that. there has not been a deleterious inmact on the surrounding
properties.
The proposed parcels will have a width adequate to design and build a
single family residence with required setback that will be an asset to
property values in the area.
NORTH
CITY OF ITE.Nl:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trr E: ��►�o ��� �
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT-_SCALE'
A
O
O
1
Iz
Oj
•
Jc
CITY •
• •. • • !�i�. •� _
PLANNING 1
r t .. r
RESOLUTION NO.
® A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 83-03 TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH LOCATED ON HELLA VISTA, WEST OF
CARNELIAN IN THE R-1-20,000 ZONE
WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of June, 1983, an application was filed and
accepted on the above-described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 27th day of July, 1983, the Planning Commission held
a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California
Government Code_
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following in ings:
1. That strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement cf the specified regulation would result
in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the
Zoning Code.
2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property involved or to the intended use of the
property that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same :one.
3. That strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of ether properties in the same zone.
4. That the granting of the Variance will not
constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent
with the limitations on other properties classified
in the same zone.
5. That the granting of the Variance will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY$ 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
® Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
Resolution No.
Page 2
ATTEST:
Secretary o the Panning Commissior.
is SACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, ao hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular mseating of the Plaan:rg Commission held
on the 27th day of July, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CY'Y'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G�ycAaro�,
STAFF REPORT
z 1 �
01
1=
DATE: July 27, 1983 01�' i>
177
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
^-y: Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8011 - BRIMAR DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION - A ivision of -02 acres of into parcels within the
itzone located on the south side of Bella Vista, west of
Carnelian - APN 1061-221-21 (Ref: Variance 83-03)
I_ PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of parcel map.
B. PLr ose: To subdivide a lot into 2 parcels.
C. Location: South side of Bella Vista, approximately 1,000 feet west
o Carne ian Street.
D. Parcel Size: 1.02 acres; Parcel 1 & 2= 20,000 sq. ft. each.
E. Existing Zonings: R-1-20,000.
F. Existinq Land Use: Vacant.
G_ Surroundin Land !3se and Zoning:
Nort - Resi entia , R-1-20,000
South - Vacant, R-1-20,000
East - Residential, R-1-20,000
West - Residential,R-1-20,000-
H. General Plan Designations:
North - Very 2du/ac
South - Very low, 2 du/ac
East - Very low, 2 du/ac
West - Very low, 2 du/ac
I. Site Characteristics: The site slopes from north to south at
approximately gramme. No structure exists on the site.
•"F ITEM J
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 8011
July 27, 1983
Page 2
II. ANALYSIS:
This property division will result in two lots with a density of 2
dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the General Plan for
the area. The net area of each lot will exceed 20,000 s.f. after
providing a 25 foot offer of dedication for Bella Vista Drive. Even
though the lot area is within standards, the width of each proposed lot
is less than the g0 foot minimum in the zone. The proposed 81.5 foot
width is, however, similar to many of the adjacent lots and a variance
for your consideration is on tonight's agenda to provide for the
substandard width.
Bella Visa is a private street, however, it is paved and well maintained
and provides acceptable all-wea,`' d(:LC�S to the many houses it
serves. A copy of the Commission's policy o� access to subdivisons is
attached so that it can be determined if a variation from the dedication
requirement is appropriate in this case.
The nap has been reviewed by the Equestrian Committee and it was
determined that an equestrian easement matching any existing utility
easements to the east and west should be obtained. Staff will report on
the status of these easements at the meeting.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial
Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the
Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field
investigation. upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field
investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a
result of the proposed subdivision.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE:
Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners
and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also
been completed.
i'
1.
PLANNING
COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 8011
Page 3
A
t.
V. RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and
-. sion
elements of the project. If, after such c nsid ras 'w°~ itter� inothesCity
can support the recommended conditions of app.
Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be
appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be
issued.
k Respectfully submitted,
R_ ��
�. LBH:56�7aa
Attachments: Map
Resolution
City Engineer's Report
initial Study
I
I
i.
YM,
s
d � i
ar�y'9� x t�� a• ��e �vr c �A`� otf
z
Q .
V ate _ _ /� - w�n•r�r.r..v r.._. sv�•�.v b �.�!�
Op - •' - \I jam/ «. O.Tq•O�F �/{f'IQ,•W OIO j��Ji _�- ••�'•� •�
G Yt. �. .. �r ``•� __
co
�/�e p— 2 W iA". \
\/ pUOV �_
-JAW
Z o
I..2aa
rfN ZQ.•� c; � ,
V=og
1 W�1�2
ANC -� � �n►� �j �'ewi Sa ^• 69
W �
\
n _ ills
' RESOLUTION NO. 79-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING SUBDIVISION
ACCESS 131PROVF24ENT POLICY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
wishes to discourage the proliferation of private unimproved streets; and
TnTHEREAS, it is necessary to establis!: firm policy guideline to
inform property owners of the City goals.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IS RESOLVED AND ESTABLISHED, that as a condition
of approval of any Parcel Map, Parcel Map 'Waiver, Tract *tap or Lot Line
Adjustment an applicant shall have access to a fully dedicated and maintained
City street. Wp:c__ dedications and improvements do net exist, the applicant
' shall obteir, a ninimun of torte (40) feet of dedication and improve with
�"26) feet of pavement needed street_ frontage to reach the nearest
..sintained City street.
Variations from this policy will require approvol of the iity Engineer
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga subject to appeals to the Planning Commission.
y APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JtU ARY, 1379.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By:dr,t-f-,-Z
,Herman Rempel, Chairman
ATT EST—�
fi
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga at
t; a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of January, 1979,
by the following vote to-wit:
AYES:' COMMISSIONERS: GARCIA, TOLSTOY, JONES, REMFFL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMISSICNERS: DAHL
k
,71
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87. 00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi-
ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration
will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant
environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report
Will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report
should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa-
tion concerning the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Tentative ?arcel Map No. 8013
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: (714) 981-7442
John Olsen Jr.
44 Eu'clie rratPnt- Fast. Upland. CA 91786
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Gary Cann (714) q80-1911
9587 Arrow Route- Suite H. Rancho Cvcamonyga _ CA 91730 _
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. )
South side of Bella Vista- west of Carnelian
Assessors No_ 1061-221-21
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
Cucamonga C_otinty Water District-Southern California Edison ro=rjr
Chino Basin Municipal Water District, Southern Califcrnia ,a ro
Foothill Fire T)iatrict and Cenral T lenhora oRmanv,
I-1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To divide existing vacant lot into two
parcels.
ACREAGE OF Pt.JJECT AR.FA AND. SQUARE: FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, T.F ANY:
Total area is 44,260 so. ft. Gross Jj,JUU sq. ft. total area after
street dedication No buildings on site)
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF TFE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ,
ANIMALS, ANY CUL!-UR.;k-L, HISTORICAL Oa SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) :
This property is on the south side of Bella Vista and approxiiLtely
1100 feet west of Carnelian in Alta Loma.
On the west, north E east sides of the site are existing residential
buildings. There is one vacant lot on the north side of Bella Vista.
On the south side of the site is a vacant field.
The proposed -parcels have a net area of 19,660 + c=. fr_ with82_SO fa_+
fron aZe on $al a Vista. Th` land 21pna from north to south at aR,rox -
�a.
The site has no apparent cultural historical or grenin3sj=ts. The
anima.l life is presumed to consist of snail birds. rodents and reptiles
indifrenous to the local area.
r
4;
r Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
NO
I-2
WILL THIS PROJEC=:
YES NO
X 1. Create 1 substantial change in ground
contours?
Y 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (Police, fire, hater,
sewage, etc. ) ?
Y 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many?
X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially tazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
IMPORTANT: I£ the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements
furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information. required for this initial evaluation
to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional
information may be required to be submitted before an adequate
evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee.
A �
Date (o ZI. ? Signature � �.
S Title QGyi�G/
I-3
i�
Y' RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA., CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER
8011 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8011) LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF BELLA VISTA DRIVE, WEST OF CARNELIAN STREET
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8011, submitted by Brimar
Development Corp. and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the south side of
Bella Vista Drive approximately 1,000 feet west of Carnelian Street being a
divisil.n of a portion. of Lot 9, Block 17, Cucamonga Homestead Association, as
per map recorded in Book 6 of ,'•taps, Page 46, Records of San Bernardino County,
State of California; and
WHEREAS. on June 6, 1983, a formal application was submitted
requesting review of the above-described Tentative Map; and
WHEREAS, on July 27, 1983, the Planning Commission held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above-described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the General Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage, public
health problems or have adverse affects on abuttinc
property.
SECTION 2: That this project xiil not create significant adverse
environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on July 27, 1983.
SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8011 is approved subject to
the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: _
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
y .
ATTEST•
Secretary of the Planning Commission
1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 27th day cf July, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMVISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CM Of kANCHO CIXAMONGA
RECOMENDED CONOiTIONS OF APPROVAL
LOCATION: South of Bella Vista Drive, 1000 ft . TENTATIVE MAP NO. 8011
west of Carnelian DATE FILED: 6/21/83
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lot 9, NUMBER OF LOTS: 2
Block 17, Cucamonga Homestead Assoc:., Book 6 GROSS ACREAGE: 1.02
of maps, Page 46, San Bernardino County ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 10E1-221-21
DEVELOPER OWNER EN6INEERfSURVEYOR
Brimar Development Co. same Linville-Sanderson & Assoc
c/o John Olsen
2442 Euclid Crescent East 9587 Arrow, Suite H
Upland CA 91786 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the
Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in=lude, but may not be limited
to, the follwing:
Dedications and Vehicular Access
1 . Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights-of-way
and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map.
X 2. Offer .of Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-
way on the following streets:
25 feet on Bella Vista Drive
additional feet on
additional feet on
3. Corner property line radius will be required per City
Standards.
4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated
as follows:
5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring
access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all cormn
roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.s
and shell be recorded concurrent with the map.
6. All existing easements lying within future right-of-way are to
be quitclaimed or delineated or. the map per City Engineer's
requirements.
7. Easements for sidewalk, for public use shall be dedicated to the
City where sidewalks meander througK private property.
Surety
1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the
satisfaction :)f the City Engineer and City Attorney,
guaranteeing ;ompletion of the public improvements prior to
recording for and/or
prior to building permit issuance for
X 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map
for the following: construction of Bella Vista Dr. to include
curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, street trees and
lights.
X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing
completion of all on-site drainage facilites necessary for
dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and
Safety Divison prior to recording for the map.
Street Improvements
Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section
16.36.120, the subidiver may enter into an agreement and post sec'rity with the
City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map
and/or building permit issuance.
1. Construct fuil street improvements including, but not limited
to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches,
parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets.
2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide
dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-
section streets.
3. Construct the following miss'.ng improvements:
Prier to recordation for
Prier to building permit issuance for
Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street A.C. Median
Stree*. flame Gutter Pvmt. Walk Ap r. Trees Li hts Overlay Island' Otfier
1
*Includes landscaping and irrigation or meter
i
d. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way,
fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained
frc:n the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other
permits required.
5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared yn a Registered prior
Civil Engineer and approved by
the City to
issuance of an encroachment permit.
5. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the
relocation of any power poles or other existing public
utilities as necessary.
?. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the prOperty shall be
undergruunded.
8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs,
striping and markings with locations and types approved by the
City Engineer.
g. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the
Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with
underground service.
10.Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of
building permit.
11.Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under
sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards.
Drainage and flood Control
1. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be
required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map.
X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance
ce and disposal
of surface drainage entering .he property
from3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the
satisfaction of the City En ineer
4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage
study for the project shall be submitted to the City
Engineering for review.
5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be
constructed to detain increased runofF
Grading
X 1. Grading e€ the subject property shall be in accordance with the
Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted
grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading
plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer
licensed by the State of California to perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer
or geologist and submitted at the time of application or
grading plan check.
4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval
by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to
recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of
building permit whichever comes first.
X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the
Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of
building permit.
General Requirements and Approvals
X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows:
CalTrans for
San Bernardino County Flood Control District
X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water
San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to
issuance of a grading permit)
Other
2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C.&R.$)
approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation
of the map.
X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage,
water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street
constructon.
X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga
County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is
required.
5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval
from CalTrans/San Bernardino County Flood Control District.
X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other
interested agencies involved. Approval of tine final map will
be subject to any requirements that may be recei%ed from them.
Y;
X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not
guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at
the time building permits are requested. When building permits
are requested, the Cucamonga. County Water Di-•trPct ermltsllwlll be
asked to certify the availability of capacity.
not be issued unless said certification is received in writing.
S. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance
with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths,
maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed contrcl,
in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation
for and/or prior to building permit issuance
for
9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City
coverimated cost
underiAssessmenttDistrict 82-1 among apportioning
ewly assessments
created parcels.
X 1D.At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be
submitted: Title Report, traverse calcrilations (sheets),
copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/or
showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks
referenced.
X 11.Easement or easements shall be obtained to provide fur
drainage from the property prior to issuance of building
® permits.
12.A variance allowing the proposed lot widths must be obtained
prior to recording.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCN ONGA
LLOM B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER
by.
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,OCF.n-O
STAFF REPORT 'A,'�
� j r
® O s
FDAIE: July27, 1983 �' 1977
TO: ning Commission
1 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
By: Shintu Bus-, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: ENVIP.ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8007 - BIANE - A division
off .8 acres into 4 parcels within the R- -20, 00 zone located on
the west side of Hermosa Avenue between Wilson and Hillside - APN
201-083-04
i
I. PKOJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map.
B. Purpose- To subdivide the site and to create a separate lot for
the existing residence.
C. Location: West of Hermosa Avenue between Wilson Avenue and
HT Tsiae Road.
D. Parcel Size: Parcel I. - 12.0 acres
Parcel 2 - 1 .3 acres
Parcel 3 - 2.4 acres
Parcel 4 - 2.1 acres
17.8 acres
E. Existing Zoning: R-1,20,000.
E. Existing Land Use: Two residential buildings and vacant land.
G. Surreundin Land Use and Zoning:
North - ne residence and vacant land, A-1-5
South - Vacant, R-1-20,000
East - Residential, A-1-5
West - one residence and vacant land, R-1,20,000 (Tent. TR. 10047)
H. General Plan Desisnations:
North - Very Low, e GU/dC
South - Very Low, 2 du/ac
East - Very Low, 2 du/ac
West - Very Low, 2 du/ac
ITEM K
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF F.EPORT
Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 8007
July 27, 1983
Page 2
I. Site Characteristics: The site slopes from north to south at
approximately grade. The site contains two residential
structures and the rest of the site consists of orange groves and
grape vineyards.
II. ANALYSIS:
This proposed lane :vision separates an existing large residential lot
from the remainaer of an 18 acre parcel in an area zoned and planned for
R-1,20,000 development. The subdivision provides a 12 acre parcel for
further subdivision and leaves. larger parcels adjacent to the existing
estate, which occupies 2.4 acres, for possible ;;i,;ilar development.
Future subdivison of Parcel 1 could provide a continuation of the pattern
set. by Tentative Tract 10047 on the west. If the street in TT 10047 is
not continued, then some provision must be made for accommodating the
half street. The stub street shown at the west line of Parcel 2 could
provide access for a further split for Parcel 2 into half-acre lots. If
such a split does not occur, then the stub street can easily be
redesigned as a cul-de-sac.
Under Title 16 of the City Code, street improvements on the perimeter of
Parcel 1 must be provided if a usable structure exists on the lot. For
this reason, Londition No. 14 has been imposed. Where such improvements
are not appropriate, the City Council has the power to waive the
requirement.
Condition No. 18 (General) provides for additional trail dedication on
Hermosa for a Community Trail . Feeder trails will be provided upon
further development per the recommendation of the Trail Committee.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial
Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the
Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field
investigation. Upon completion and review of the initial Study and field
investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a
result of the proposed subdivision.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE:
Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners
and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also
been completed.
r
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 8007
July 27, 1983
Page 3
V. RECOMMENDATION-
it is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input a.nd
on
elements of the project. If, after such consideration, ou
the Conn,
can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City
appropriate Report,
tis then
alsoarecommended theoption o attachedt a cN�egat Negative resolution Declaration be
issued.
Respectfully submit ed,
LBH:S jaa
Attachments: Map
Resolution
City Engineer's Report
Initial Study
a�. TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP N0.t €3007
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA'
BOW A DMSION OF A PORTION OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOLITHEAST
1/4 OF THE SOELITHWEST 114 OF SECTIGN 23.TOWNSHIP I NORTH RANGE
7 WEST. SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL
PLAT THEREOF _
� LJNVILLE—SANDERSON 8 ASSOCIATcES.
owi Emme A Lana Surveyors
CD
��1• s"Q9 �I•rai r �`:L_
-.�: ''1Lr� LiJt�y �44.TL�J • —:J:10aYlr
- - — — T• — — Al _
- � t —�a31•�� � �� 5�tai
er,unes �
pMEf-LCYr[LYTll G 61.ti pAwf apyy,•L .Ys/r A
dy
mOIwF..ai LION GI/O'Y,GY. vas I.�•IY(iwal{AY,�
,mrs: ......, o .w. _
L w...r, nw:.f� pa
i
ay.brw�a•b O rr
MbrP OYA
yp�yiwe-rM✓ NC?,/17' aul
ei5; JaOr ter.L �s
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, tae Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the initial Study. The Development Review
Committee Wi�l meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no significant
environmental impact and a 'Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The pr')ject will have a significant environmental
impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared,
or 3) An additional information report should be sapplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning the
proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Parcel Map No. 8007
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: (714) 987-4208
Philo & Jeanne Biane 91701
100�0 Wilson Avenue, Alta Loma
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Gary T. Sanderson (714) 980-1211
a 730
9587 Arrow Poute Suite H acho Cugpin C
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
10050 Wilson Avenue Alta Loma California _
Assessors No. 201-083-04
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
Cucamon a Coun Water District Southern California �.is�_
Southern California Gas Compo Chaffey UnzZi shoo istrict,
Alta Lora Elementary School District
I-1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Beira a divis;cn o` a tk inn of Th
East 1/2, Southeast 7 4 �o,lthwe 1/4
Divide existing_s;t in o four nar -is
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: m'ltal area is 17.8 ± ages At the
nortlTaest corner of Parcel l is an old rock ho s larnrnx;ma+Pi .
900 sa. ft. ). On Parcel 3 is a house (3,400 sq. ft. ) and winery
(3,200 sq. ft. ). No proposed or existing building on remaining -parcels.
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
The project site lies in Alta Lorca at the northwest corner of
Hermosa Avenue and Wilson Avenue. The site is actually bounded
by three streets; Hillside 'P.oad on the north. Wilson Avenue on
the south, Hermosa Avenue on the east On the west side is vacant
land which is a proposed tract (10047).
The site contains the owners residence. The land slopes from
north to south at approxiriately 6 ,. The site consists of orange
groves and .grape vineyards.
The site has not apparent cultural historical or scenic as cts.
The animal life is presumed to consist of small birds rodents
and reptiles indigenous to Ti-,. local a-
The surrounding land uses are residential or agricultural
Is this project, part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small ,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
NO
i-2 •
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
X 1. Sreate a substantial change in ground
— — ..�ntoa:rs?
X p. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.):
X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
— general plan designations?
_ X 5. Remove any existing trees? Hcw many?
X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
IMPORTAA'T: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I furt�er understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development
Review Committee.
/ /�Date C 6 Z�3 Signature`1 �--
i
Title
I-3
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
The following infnrmation should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the
school district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. :
Specific Location of project:
PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL
1. Number of single
family units:
2. Number of ;multiple
family units:
3. Date proposed to
begin construction:
4. Earliest date of
occupancy:
Model t
and f of Tentative
5. Bedrooms Price Ranae
M
T
1-4
® RESOLUTION NO. *
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANC10 CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER
8007 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8007), LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE BETWEEN WILSON AVENUE AND HILLSIDE
ROAD
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8007, submitted by Philo &
Jeanne Biane and consisting of 4 parcels, located on the west side of Hermosa
Avenue b.tween Wilson Avenue and Hillside Road, being a division of a portion
of the east 1/2 of the southeast 1/4, of the southwest 1/4 of Section 23, T 1
N, R 7 W, San Bernardino Median, according to the official plat thereof; and
WHEREAS, on June 21, 1983, a formal application was submitted
requesting review of the above-described Tentative Map; and
1:14FREAS, on July 27, 1983, the Planning Cjmmission held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above-described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent melt!: the General Plan.
3. That the s4ce is physically suitable for the
proposed development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage, public
health problems or have adverse affects on abutting
property.
SECTION 2: That : is project will not create significant adverse
env irormenta impacts and a Ne��ative Declaration is issled on July 27, 1983.
SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8007 is approved subject to
the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 19E3.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,%IOMGA
BY-
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
fnn
Resolution No.
Page 2
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cxmmission held
on the 27th day of July, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
t
a>
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPR0VAL
LOCATION: West side of Hermosa between TENTATIVE MAP NO. 8007
Wilson Ave. and Hillside Rd. DATE FILED: 6121183
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of E 1/2 of NUMBER OF LOTS: 4
SE 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Section 23, T1N, R7W GROSS ACREAGE: 17.8
5.8. B. & M. ASSESSOR PA.a CcL NO. 201-083-04
*,rter,K+***i-,tax*#**:tt�*,tir,�-tr***#*t-'.-h�,t*ir�*iHct,t-riNkricr::trill r****xtttt�c�nt**,t�*,rtMrt-,t*
DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER/SURVEYOR
Philo & Jeanne Biane same Linville-Sanderson & Assoc.
10050 'Wilson Avenue 9587 Arrow, Suite H
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the
Municipal Cede of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited
to, the following:
Dedications and Vehicular Access
1 . Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights-of-way
and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map.
X 2. Dedication shall be made of the fullowing rights-of-ray cn the
following streets:
_ 11 additional feet on Wilson Ave.
9 additional feet on Hermosa Ave. equestriar.
additional feet on Hi si a to provide ut imate
eet wide right-of-way.
X 3. Corner property line radius Mill be required per Cit;
Standards. Radius 24 feet at Wilson and Hermosa.
4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated
as fellows:
5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring
access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common
roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.s
` and shall be recorded concurrent with the map.
u.
s':
X 6. All existing easements lying within future right-of-way are to
be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's
requirements.
7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the
City where sidewalks meander through private property.
Surety
X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney,
guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to
recording for Parcel No. 3 and prior to building permit
issuance for other parcels.
2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map
for the following:
X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing
completion of all on-site drainage facilites necessary for
dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and
Safety Divison prior to recording for the map.
Street Improvements
Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section
16.36.120, the subidiver may enter into an agreement and post security with
City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map
and/or building permit issuance.
1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited
to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches,
parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets.
2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide
dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-
section streets.
X 3. Construct the following missing improvements:
Prior to recordation for arrpl
Prior to building permi issuance or of er parse s
t Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street A.C. Median
Street Name ! Gutter Pvmt. I Walk IAPpr. Treesl Lights Overlay Island* ther
Wilson X ± X X X X X X
�u a ruction
Hermosa X X X X X X X
Hillside** X I X X X X X X
* includes landscaping and irrigation or meter
y **Special design
X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way,
fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit :hall be obtained
from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other
® permits required.
X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to
issuance of an encroachment permit.
X 5. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the
relocation of any power poles or other existing public
utilities as necessary.
X i. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be
" undergrounded.
X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs,
striping and markings with locations and types approved by the
City Enginmcr.
X g. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the
Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. I.+.at'ts shill be on decorative poles with
underground service .
10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of
building permit.
cross
11. 1`lydersidetwalk drainage
drains a shalllows shall be installed totCity Standards.
Drainaae and Flood Control
aina
1. nage easements r
required and shall be del neated ors noticed onr the final ma;,.be
isposal
X 2' Adequate
surface drainage entering thedproperty from adjacente for acceptance and areas.
of areas.
3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer
4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage
study for the project shall be submitted to the City
Engineering for review.
5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be
constructed to detain increased runoff
Gradin
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the
Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted
grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading
plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer
licensed by the State of California to perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer
or geologist and submitted at the time of application or
grading plan check.
4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval
by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to
recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of
building permit whichever comes first.
X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the
Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of
building permit.
General Requirements and Approvals
1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows:
CalTrans for
San Bernardino County Flood Control District
Cucamonga County water District for sewer and water
San Bernardino Ccunty Oust Abatement (required prior to
issuance of a grading per^:t)
Other
2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C.&R.$)
approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation
of the map.
X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage,
water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street
constructor.
X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga
County Hater District standards. A letter of acceptance is
required.
5. This subdivision shail be subject to conditions of approval
from CalTrans/San Bernardino County Flood Control District.
X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities ;nd other
interested agencies involved. Approval of tt! final map will
be subject to any requirements that may be received from then.
X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not
guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at
the time building permits are requested. When building permits
are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be
asked tc certify the availability of capacity. Permits will
not be issued unless said certification is received in writing.
X S. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be Provided in accordance
with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths,
maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control,
in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation
for and/or prior to building permit
issuance for
9. Prior to recording, a deposit snail be posted with the City
covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments
under Assessment District 82-1 among the newly created parcels.
X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be
submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets),
copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/or
showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks
referenced.
X 11. Provide private easements for drainage of Parcel 1.
X 12. Provide design of drainage structure to dewater Parcel: 1 to
asafe place of disposal to the satisfaction of the Building
Dffical prior to recordation of the map.
X 13. Construction of the drainage improvements shall be accomplished
prior to any further development an Parcel 2, 3 and 4.
X 14. Habitable dwellings on Parcel 1 +gust be removed or improvements
for the parcel bonded prior to recording.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LLOYD B. MUS, CITY ENGINEER
by:
j.
i;,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C., 0
STAFF REPORT
0
DATE: July 27, 1983 �I >
t�
TO: Piannir"g Commission I
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7966 - HAHN/FOOTHILL
A AT ION- A tvision of 97.5 acres into parcelocate.. cn the
sout�e of Miller Avenue between future Day Creek Boulevard and
Victoria Loep within the Victoria Planned Community zoned for
Regional Commercial - APi% 227-161-27, 29, 30, 32; 227-171-09, 17;
227-201-34; 227-211-2, 21
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION-
A. _Action Requested: Approval of parcel map.
B. Purpose: To divide a parcel for the regione' center for financial
and conveyance purposes.
C. Location: South side of Miller Avenue between Day Creek Blvd. and
'Jjc- for a Loop.
D. Parcel Size: 97.5 acres
E. Existing" Zoning: PC 80-1 (Regional Center).
F. Existing Land Use: Vacant.
G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
Nort - vacant- - (Regional related office & high 24-30 du/ac)
South - Vacant-PC 80-1 (Regional related office)
East - ':3cant-Freeway R-1
West - Vacant-Edison R!W PC 80-1. I
H. General Plan Designations:
North-mice & high residential 24- 30 du/ac
South - O.fice/Corsnercial
East - Co?rierci al
West - Edison R/W.
ITEM L
PLANNiNb I.UMM1»1'JN STAP- RtPURI
Environmental AssEssment and Parcel Map 7966
July 27, 1983
Page 2
I. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and gently slopes from
north to south. No structure units are on-site.
II. ANALYSIS:
This one lot parcel map is proposed for the purpose of consolidating
property for eventual development under the Victoria Planned Community
designation of a commercial center. The map will provide rights-of-way
for some major streets included in that master plan, but no improvements
are appropriate now. Completion of improvements on existing and proposed
streets is recommended for deferral to the time of development.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial
Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the
Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field
investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field
investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment ss a
result of the proposed subdivision.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE:
Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners
and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Pasting at the site has also
been completed.
V. RECOMMENDATION:
it is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and
elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission
can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City
Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be
appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be
issued.
Respectfully subm' ted,
(IH:
VL :jaa
Attachments: Map
Resolution
City Engineer's Report
Initial Study
i
_• 'q cn�.•:'^" ,�'-`r 1 . ! yr'r sc >..►c�aA1:.�.r> .�gl i� '.�� L.e�• cull. I--
I I I
�I � I � � �v 1V � c��� 3�0 �`•li I
I
PARCEL 1
�Ar
Yc o.Tc "9cr. I 1 I
•ia.n ry aK• �. SS i
I
�szx • \'� �9b • � 8� � I
yap.D K.f'J mtl[41K P I � I I w I
-yT IYpI YiY.i t w.11... \VA u fIi
W II \
. .0 aravlo-.¢•nwlPnwTc. I ,�
i. PISr:K$PIK ,¢LtwY I �3T lY F 1
. I .es+ -mho-wc. .r.w.IODTwu •amcuTei [] \�, I
glm.uy, -aue rr.. IwK rarrwu acw. I Z i �� l 1
[IM2•,T.l[ )i) YYA1 C1[Ill4a.a 1:1f0 � ` \
- T(C Y.b t.tillK YImIKJ ti � 4 � Y1 I
P T•ai PITIK y SIT[. ��: �. 1
Is
yynEs(µ1.PM1.CN m. MIX . 5
Um•Ia11: O.M bRw,IPP
fM..FYr•n II. W K. ),1'+46TPYr \ C ti' ( 4' .c
,1.CR4Yp:K.u LUI pLL<.
(•:q b1Y: flLv. 1P4q �7 h'�lf:/••jM• i
Jp i, CyI.T urt, :w M Cln P Y[.O W,1G,. �/,
APw.u,:tM 0M(.P tM O•m1.D.ST.1[ W' /(♦rr
()1 )ql-IJu v(YI,OM,..tIK.fUOlvl. ��9r
L.3
c��,r+m+(+o-Tn m,•.i(armro b.•w.u •:Tq,vzml••ap•rn ml®a Y6O C1•IO..(p Tc Tti y.TI V:,.SK1•Ql.ce uKs+..1.mrICTO♦1.O..FIn rv,.wT w.R. (KILLM,JY q/T.•K.@KSi01111CO � Cd
®wC[NnOMi gn WSO
�����
T
I
t
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Arrsessment Review Fee: $E7. 00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard., The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi-
ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration
will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant
environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report
will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report
should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa-
tion concerning the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: TPM-7966
APPLICANT`S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: C714) 641-8777
HALL & FOREMk-1, INC. RICHARD R. DOOLITTLE
31 -L AIRWAY AVENUE
COSTA VESA, CALIFORNIA 92626
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: RICHARD R. DOOLITTLE C714) 041-8777
OR JOE DIIORIO R.C. LAND CO. 10340 FOOT"ILL BLVD., RfiNCHO CUCAMptdGA, CA
91730 TELEPHOW: C714) 980-3040
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
S.E. CORNER OF MILLER AND FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD IN VICTORIA P.C.
AP NUMBERS: 227-i61-27,29,30,32 227-211_-3,21
227-171-09,17
227-201-34
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS :
NO OTHER PERMITS OR AGiNCIES ARE INVOLVED WITH THIS TPM.
I-1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT, TPM -966 IS A ONE-LOT SUBDIVISION OF 97.5 ACRES
c N . . L P S
FOR FiNANCiAL AND cOFT'I4
1CH
WAS [Xf-Ull by c.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE AT T CONSISTSAGE OF IS ING5 ACRES
AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF Al c r
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ,
Al, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERT?ES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND 'THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) :
PLEASE REFERENCE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR VICTORIA PLANNED
Is the project part of a larger project, one Of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
TriE PARCEL IS LOCATED WITHIN VICTORIA PLANNED CorlMUNITY. PLEASE REFERENCE
THE ABOVE EiR.
1-2
WILL, THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
X 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
—— municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc. ) ?
X q. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
_ X_ 5. Remove any existing trees? How many?_
X 6. Create the need for use or disposal o£
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flanm.ables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above: N/A
I47PORTANT: if the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
N/A
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements
furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial evaluation
to the best of my ability, and that the facts , statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best o£ lay
know further understar
ledge and belief. I I that additional
information may be required to be submitted efore an adequate
evaluation. can be made by the o ment R iew Committee.
y� n
Date f Signature --
{ R CHARD R. LI ,
Title VICE ?REST
HALL S FOREMAN, INC.
1-3
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
�e following information should oe provided to .he City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school
district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name vf Developer and Ter_`ative Tract No. :
Specific Location of Prcject: _
PHASE I FHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAI
1. Number of s? ngle
family units:
2. Number of multiple
family units:
3. Date proposed to
begin construction:
Earlie_t date of10 -
occupancy:
Model r
and ¢ of Tentative
5. Bedzooms Price Range
1-4
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RA-NCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, „PPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBED
7966 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7966), LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF MILLER AVENUE BETWEEN GAY CREEK F_JLEVARD
AND VICTORIA LOOP STREET
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7966, submitted by Hahn/Foothill
Associates and consisting of I parcel, located on the south side of Miller
Avenue between Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Loop Street being a division
of a portion of Block S & X of the Etiwanda Colony Lands as per :sap recorded
in Book 2, Page 'e4 of heaps, also Block 4 and Block 5 and a portion of Blocks
3,6, 9, 10 and 11 of the Etiwanda Cactus Acres as per map recorded in Book 19,
Page 63 of Maps, also a portion of Parcel 2 and a portion of Parcel 3 of
Parcel Map 1, as per map recorded in Book 1, Page 1 of Parcel Map Book, all
records of San Bernardino County, California.
WHEREAS, on June 23, 1983, a formal application was submitted
requeEting review of the above-described Tentative Map; and
WHEREAS, on July 27, 1983, the Planning Commission held , duly
advertised public hearing for the above-described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
1. That the nap is consis`ent with the General Plan.
2. That th-3 improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the General Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage, public
healtn problems or have adverse affects on abutting
prop(_rty.
SECTION 2: That this project will rot create significant adverse
environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on July 27, 1983.
SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7966 is approved subject to
the reconinended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
® BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chair,.,an
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Panning COmG;lsSion
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduces, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City cf Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 27th day of Juiy, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COKMISSIONERS:
WES: C"ISSIONERS:
ABSENT: CONIl7ISSIONERS:
ti,;
CITY of RANCHO CCCRMOHGA
RECOW-NDE0 CONDITIONS of APPROVAL
LOCATION: south side of Miller Ave. between TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7966
Day Creek Blvd. and Victoria Loop DATE FILED: 6/23/83
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of the East 1/2 NUMBER OF LOTS: 1
of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of GROSS ACREAGE: 9?.5
Section 23, TlN R7k San Bevnardino ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 227-161-271 29 30 32
Meridian, according to icia, Plat t ereof.227-171-09,227-20 34;22 -2% 11 21
r�x*:*ir,r�rrc+tr�,irt�tta-�t�r�*+rtirx�r�,r,ttcirt,�,t,tr*,r,tag,t�firttYrtnt�**tom:*,rt��-,rra*x�,�
} DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER/SURVEYOR
Kahn-Foothill Assoc. same Hall & Foreman, Inc.
10340 Foothill Blvd. 3186-L Airway Ave.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Costa Mesa CA 92626
Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the
Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but w.,y not be iimited
to, the following:
Dedications and Vehicular Access
X 1 . Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights-of-way and
all necessary easinenti as shown on the tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the
following streets:
additional feet on _
additional feet un _
ar'ditionai feet on
X. 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards.
4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as
foilows-
5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensurtng
access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads,
drives or parking areas shall hF provided by C.C.&P..s and shall be
recorded concurrent with the map.
_ 1
Y, 6. All existing easements lying within future right-,-f-way are to be
quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's
requirements.
X 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated o the
City where sidewalks meander through private prope.rty.
Surety
X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing
completion of the public improvements prior to building permit
issuance for Parcel 1.
2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map
for the following:
3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing
completion of all on-site drainage facilites necessary for
d3watering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building dnd
Safety Divison prior to recording for
and/or prior to issuance of building permit or
Street Improvements
Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section
16.36.120, the subidiver may enter into an agreement and post security with the
City guaranteeing the required construction prior to :-ecordatien of the map
and!or building permit issuance.
1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to,
curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches,
parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets.
2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide dedicated
right-of-way shall to constructed for all hall-section streets.
X 3. Construct the following missing improvements:
Prior to building permit issuance for Parcel 1.
Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street A.C. Media* +
Street Name butter Pvmt, talk r. Trees Li hts Overla Isiand he
rl
Miller Ave. X X X X X X X
Da Creek Bi X X X I X , 7 X
Victoria i oo X X I X I X X X
*Includes landscaping and irrigation or meter
X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees
shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from
f the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits
required.
X _ 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an
encroachment permit.
X 5. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the
relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities
as necessary.
X 7. Existing lines of 12KV .or less fronting the property shall be
undergrounded.
X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs,
striping and markings with locations and types approved by the
City Engineer-
X g. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the
Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground
service.
X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit.
X 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under
sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards.
Drainage and Flood Control
1. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be
required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map.
2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of
surface drainage entering the property from adJacent areas.
3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer
4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study
for the project shall be submitted to the Cit , Engineering for
review.
5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed
to detain increased runoff _
Gradin
X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the
Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading
practices. The f-,nal grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the app-:ved conceptual grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed
by the State of California to perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or
geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan
check. .
4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by
the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation
of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit
whichever comes first.
X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the
Building and Safety Division for approval prier to issuance of
building permit.
General Requirements and Approvals
1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows.
Cal'rans for
San Bernardi nFff5untY Flood Cor._rod District
Cucamorga County Water District for sewer and water
San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to
issuance of a grading permit)
Other
2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C.Rt.$)
approved by the City Attorney is required prior to rec:;rdation of
the map.
X 3. °rovide all utility services to each lot including ;owerage,
Facer, electric power, gas and telephone anion to street
construction.
X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga
County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is
required.
5. This subdivision shall he subject to conditions of approval from
CalTrans/San Bernardino County Fl2od Control District.
X 5. Approvals have not veep secured from all utilities and other
interested agencies involved. Approval of the tir31 map well be
subject to any requirements that may be received :rem theca.
X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of sane does not
guarantee that sewer treatment capacity wiii be available at the
time building permits are requested. When building hermits are
requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to
certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued
unless said certification is received in writing.
8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance
with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths,
maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in
accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for
and/or prior to building peri5tTissuance
To I
9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City
covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under
Assessment District 82-1 among the newly created parcels.
X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be
submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), -3pies
of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/or showing
original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced.
X U. The westerly 30-foot wide right-of-way of Day Creek Blvd. shall be
dedicated to the City concurrent with the Map.
X 12. The remainder triangular piece of property at the! southeast
portion of the map shall be merged with the existing lot to the
east concurrent with the recordation of ..he Rao.
X 13. Miller Ave. shall be aligned with the existing right-of-way by
providing an "S" curve to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
CITY OF RANCHO CllCAMOl16A
LLOYD S. HU885, CITY FKIKEER
by:
-a-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
:oil i
a
I>
i
DATE: July 27, 1983 1977 l
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-10 - PRcISSLEY - A change of
ownership for an arcade ormer ,y JJ's Arcade) in the C-1
zone to be lucated at 6642 and 6645 arnelian in the
Rancho Plaza Shopping Center.
Related File: C'.!P 82-15
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a
change in ownership for an arcade loc?:ed at 6642 and 6546 Carnelian. A
previous arcade at This location, JJ's Arcade, was approved by the
Planning Commission in August of 1982. Conditional Use Permit approvals
for arcades run with the applicant and become void upon change of
ownership or if the business operation ceases. The project sine is
presently zoned C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial).
ANALYSIS: The applicant has two years of experience operating an arcade
an -intends to start with twenty machines and expand per demand, as
shown on Exhibit "B". Per the attached Exhibit "C", the applicant
intends to provide adult supervision and proposes that no person under
18 years of age will be permitted in the arcade until after 2:00 p.m.
during school hours. The recommended Conditions of Approval are
identical to ;:hose in effect for CUP 82-15 and would limit the hours of
operation to no earlier than 10:00 a.m. and no later than 10:00 p.m. R
hone, change-maker, interior seating, vendino machines and restrooms
will be provided to discourage loitering an:. disturbances to other
businesses. Bicycle racks are located in front of the arcade.
FACTS FOR FINDING: Based on review of the information provided by the
applicant an the site, the proposed arcade meets the criteria of
Ordinance 174 and would not cause a nuisance or be materially injurious
to property in the vicinity. The proposed arcade could be compatible
eith existing shopping center uses with the adoption of the recommended
Cond{tions of Approval.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a publ c hearing in
T e Dajiy Repn-t newspaper, the property pasted, and notices sent to
property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no
correspondence has been received either for or against this project.
ITEM M
�J
Ccrditional Use Permit 83-10/Pressley
Planning Commission Agenda
July 27, 1983
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider
a ,nateriz and input regarding this item. If after such consideration
the Commission can support the facts for finding and conditions of
approval, zdoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate.
RespActfully,yybmitted,
r
I'Rr
�J .tom
Pick Gomez
City Planner
JZG:DC:jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "S" - Floor Plan
Exhibit "Cu - Descrir.:»n of Arcade
Resolution
Conditions of Approval
;;t _-
������'''••• ,fin _ �4 ., ,oc s �.. ^�
If +e...•..ac :'r'•" a '-L't o ;i
1
_ •sI
171
Cie. •i ! ( 1 i I ! i , t _. -� ` I
!]
Y Q i1f (� ' • . . t� O Imo. I
a - - -�'--- 1 {:� � � �--- 1. _..—.•
od!
z r
i •e
------------
Sir
4
f
F, o
platy caaaGE
CAS+
Poo/
TQl�!L j
v - - -1 W
' � I
oo sr
5 � _ f ,� o il4 r j I r•
1 ��RJT+DrirtS � minty+ �/K.f'ta.-m5 ' f
O k j
l
. c c
t SIEVE'S ARCADE
VUM C.*ES:
Turbo
Joust
Ms. Pac Man
GyLuss
Fhoemx
Popeye
Black :didow
Mr. Do
jungle Hunt
Congo Bongo
Make Trax
Fire PoFm=
New
}yGpa(m�es�are Markated every nth or two.
pool Table
SWRE HOik2.S:
Monday through Sunday 12:00 to 10:00
SLTERVISICN:
1 (ore) supervisor on duty at all ' ems. Change machine to provide supervisor
wirs`u more time for more important
a: Ou`- .de Cherk every half ho= after di -k.
r
No one under 18 years of age a11owe�j 5,, until after 2:00 pm during schcol.
Bn(E RACK:
Bike Krick provided to keep b-- ces off sidewalks, and to prevent thaft-
No one allowed inside with their bike on the sidewalk—
Use of our phone (at no charge) to call hoop for rides, etc.
No smoking, no loud or offensive language-
Steve's Arcade 2 years experience-
;
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83-10 FOR AN ARCADE
LOCATED AT 6642 AND 6E16 CARNELIAN IN THE C-i Z(fNE
WHEREAS, on the Sth day of July, 1983, a complete application was
filed by Steven anj Chriiti Pressleyr applicant, for review of the above-
described project; and
WHEREAS, or. the 28th day of July, 1933, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission geld a public hearing to consider the above-described project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can/cannot be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
P lan, and the purfjeses of the zone in which The use
is prop;::ei: and
L. That the prorosei 'ise, together with t`ie conditions
applicable tsiereto, well not be detrimental to the
public safety, or welfare, or nateriaily
injuries to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
2. That the proposed use will comply witF erch of the
applicable provis:uns of the Zoning Ordinar:=e.
SECTION 2: That Conditio- 1 Use Permit No. 83-10 is approved
subject to thoTTexing conditions:
PLANNING DIY;.SION
c -
1. No person under 18 years of age mzy enter, be cr
remain in any part of a game arcade during the hour
school is in regu iar session and after curfew. This
limitatiol shall be prominently posted at the
entrance of the facility, in letters not less than
1" in height, and shall be enforced t'y the adult
supervisor.
Resolution No.
Page 2
2. The following levels of adult, 21 ;ears of age or
older, supervision shall be maintained at all times
during business hours:
1-25 Amusement Devices: - 1 Adult Supervisor
26-50 Amusement Divices: - 2 Adult Supervisors
51 + Amusement Devices - 2 Adult Supervisors,
Plus 1 Uniformed
Security Guard
3. Separate public restrooms for men and women must be
provided within the approved building and
controlled.
4. An interior waiting area with seating facilities
must be provided for patrons wishing to relax or
wait for an amusement device to become available.
5. Change-making or token exchange facilities shall be
provided for patron use inside the oremises.
6. Adequate exterior lighting shall be provided for
evening security adjacent to all entrances and
exterior walls of the building where the games are
located. A"I lighting sh�.il be arranged and
shielded so as to eliminate excessive glare or
h reflection onto adjoining properties or businesses.
7. Access to the game area must be from the main
entrance to the primary use and not from a separate
exterior entrance. The rear exit shall be for "Fire
Exit Only°,
8. Adequate interior clear space shall be provided for
safe and convenient patron circulation and shall
meet the following minimum standards:
(a) Amusement devices shall be located no closer
than 12• from any wall assembly separating the
arcade from any adjacent building or portion of
a building.
(b) Provide a minimum of 60" between amusement
devices and any entrance or- exit.
`c
Yl .
L,
Resolution No.
Page 3
40
(c) Where amusement devices are locates alone one
side of an aisle, provide a minimum
unobstructed aisle width of 66". where
amusement devi.:es are located along both sides
of any aisle, provide a minimum unobstructed
aisle width of 90".
(d) Additional interior clear space may be required
by the Building Official, Foothil: Fire
District, or Sheriff's Department in order to
maintain public safety.
9. Two parking stalls adjacent to the arcade shall be
striped and designated for " bicycle only" parking
and provided with security bicycle racks to the
satisfaction of the City Planner, prior to
occupancy. Additional bicycle racks may be required
as the number of machines increase, to be determined
by the City Planner.
10. All signs on th_ exterior of the building or visible
from the outside, such as window signs, shall
require Planning Division approval in accordance
with the Sign Ordinanca.
11. No amusement device shall be used for purposes of or
in connection with, gambling. The winning of
anything of value shall constitute gambling, except
the winning of a prize in a scheduled tournament.
12. No persons shall be permitted to enter, be or remain
in any part of the arcade while in the possession
of, consuming, using or under the influence of any
alcoholic beverage or drugs. This shall be
prominen
less than 1"posted
heightinside
andthe
shallarcade
in letters
enforced by the
adult supervisor.
13. The walls, ceiling or floor, or asiy combination
t`+ereof, of. the building or structure, or portion
thereof, shall be insulated or otherwise constructed
so that no noise or vibration that is detectable
without %tie aid of any mechanical device or
instrument hall be allowed to be on the outer
perimeter of the arcade.
Resolution No.
Page 4
14. This approval shall become null and void if a
Certificate of Occupancy is not issued within 18
months from the date of approval, unless an
extension has been granted by the Planning
Comm. csion. This CUP shall be monitored and brought
back to i:'- Planning Commission within six r6)
months from occupancy to review compliance with all
Conditions of Approval and applicable City
ordinances. Failure to comply with Conditions of
Approval or applicable City Ordinances shall cause
the suspension of the Conditional Use Permit and
possible revocation of the Conditional Use Permit by
the Planning Commission.
15. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance
with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance aid. all
oth^_•r- applicable City Ordinances in effect at the
time a Certificate of Occupancy is granted.
16. This approval shall run with the applicant and shall
become void upon a change of ownership or if the
business operation ceases.
17. The parking lot shall be posted "No Loitering" in
letters not less than 1" in height on signs to the
satisfaction of the City Planner and Sheriff's
Department.
18. The hours of operation shall be no earlier than
lue_m. and no later than 11 p.m. for arcades
located in c-1 zone.
19. Applicant shall contact Planning Staff for
inspection to determine compliance with improvement
requirements prior to occupancy.
,i
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of I.-Fe-TTanning Commission
y: o_ jDz - ti
Res
s _ P
" f
• 1
Page 5
y. P
1, JACK LAN, Secretary of the Planning Commtssio�i of the CitIv of Rancho
ucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
-egui-arly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of "Ue
City of
4:..;
RanchoCucwmcnQa, at a regularPlanningCom. ission held
on bythe follow-Ina • • •vl-1n•'.
tr 1
AYES: CIT14ISSIONERS:
NOES: C^.kr-ATSSI�VERS:
ABSENT: Cot-VISSIGNERS:
{
y.,
f
�,\ •x�e 1. s '.� q x � c ;,y �• '. �xl 1 '- jy � s�
r R{f. .d ♦
,�A t
r.
•" �4.�'1 it
{C
4
w�<
r
�M
0 '
l �t
O �u
o a,
<gC:.
y� ,4
R Sjlt l
r.,
f%
ry 'll
u
♦ a_
r
e ' �
» 1
r
7 l 1
i
� 1
t'
1 '
'1.
A i
r
s .
I
i
Q
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA woo
STAFF REPORT
of ,�
DATE: .1:�1y 27, 1983
- 197
TO: MemLers of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rica: Gomez, City Planner
BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-11 - DATA DESIGN - the temporary i
placement of twu t square foot of ice tra4lers on
1.8 acres of land in conjunction with an existing
manufacturing facility in the M-R-T (Restricted
w Manufacturinc;) zone, located at 7925 Center Avenue - APN
1077-401-08
PROJECT AND SITE DESCKTPTION: The applicant, Data Design Laboratories,
is requesting approva. to use two double-wide office trailers totaling
2880 square feet in size. The Zoning Ordinance permits the temporary
use of such trailers with approval of a Coi:ditiorai Use Permit by the
Planning Commission.
The site is located on the east side of Center Avenue, one-half mile
north of Foothill Boulevard. The property is part -if an industrial
complex with four buildings totaling approximately 65,000 square feet on
24 acres of land. Exhibit "C" shows a previously approved tract map
which illustrates the future street pattern through the property and
location of each building. The trailers are to be installed on the
south side of Lot 9.
The applicznt states : that the modular units will be used for twelve to
eighteen months. new assembly operation is proposed at the site and
office space is needed for fourteen additional employees. Assuming that
the rew operation is succesful, a new office building will be
constructed on an adjacent parcel.
ANALYSIS: Two potential areas of concern relative to this application,
are: the visual impact of the trailers on adjacent property; and (2)
parking availability. As shown on Exhibit "A", the site is located
adjacent to a residential area. However, visibility of the trailers
will be reduced by a 150-foot setback from Center Avenue and landscaping j
along the street frontage, therefore no significant visual impacts are I
anticipated. Regarding parking, of the 82 spaces existing on ttic
subject parcel, the modular units will eliminate approx; ..acely 13.
However, the remaining 69 spaces satisfies 'Ile Zoning Ordinance
requirements and exceeds the anticipated number or employees at the
site. if any overflow parking is required, the adjacent buildings owned
by Data Design have approxir .tely 50 or 50 unused paarking stalls.
ITEM N
Conditional use Permit 83-11/Data Design
Planning Con.-mission .Agenda
Jury 27, 1983
Page 2
AM—
Regarding the time limit for approval, the Planning Commission has, in
the past, approved the use of trailers for two years. 5y the end of
this twc year period, a permanent facility is to be completed and/or the
trailers removed.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider
all input and elements of this project. If after such consideration. the
Commission can support the facts for findings, adoption of the attached
Resolution permitting the trailers for a two year time o:-.riod be
appropriate.
P.esp -tfully c..", LLeo,
r
Ri k Guv?, x
C' y Planner
CJ:jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Nap
Exhibit "E" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Data Design, Master Plan
Exhibit "D" - Floor Plan
Exhi64' "E_ - Letter from Applicant
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
4
i;.
p
fit. F � 1 •• i A
1TrI.,17, 7,77TrTM
���� -``�� 1 _lam Y.��a • 4
in nn@ .uno■r■ ■on r•,
OINu/.1 tui■it, noun
' Io■ ��+IIUIII •unu�■uum �.
~C!:�la•iit,fwu iiiiuum.
„� L p..r�.hN ■.■�iiituiw
IT;
/t11NIttM�t OP iii■�f
r�autna _
hni•Tii
IIf'
J(r •��rr a 1. 1'.
��t■nttltl' L, �'^
'7 Ic awau•I•
��11�11111 pl�w+wumr
•
S
R • • . •
' PLMNINTM .
'i r •
!
^ 1 +1
a\ �r
c
�./�►�I� .�ICaPI J QJD�I SWEETS No. AF 2
LOCKWOUD ENGINEERING QAT, 6-2O-8151
& SURVEYING COMPANY, INC. RANCHO G �.
k'�lnrvrEA a +F• 9+730 sTBJ5sy,
38D West Foothill BlvIL /�
Rialto. California OESMPTtor+COuo+-rrnr.+nv )Q rA -r R.C.E. 9101
1�.OT A�• t;R�fl F SEJnEATTS - t+ w --— 1
100
1 xoir5� 4 Rarr m L
r5�oi' e•5.9.3� !' 1
�-� T-es•�r t
e •23.SD" VU.55• 1
r I
Ex15rn:.: t� cizs 6 m F
a,
k7.lST NG A•C• DLZ7•..�ES PA1TJLt A1Ci
in
t) ,�� EXISTIAIG SUit_..:7e1G--- N MI'
O L—N taT 9, -rtz4c"r No.11428 v aI
Ifl i
IG,00 sca•z � I rt1 ;..
m ° -
PX0FtDSM L =&I t*M
Z EAC14 %W 19 001A011P .*FFICES T� a 2r 27
�• - zo
I
L.:a9'S3"30'E 388.36' "
v t
i �usztll� awt�i•:�� f
a�tO,ruE awor 1
-
EXtST. oFW7CEr I:fsc a*00S-F..___ 32.00 CALLS .
EXIST. IS-MOS IAl- I�SOO &0005-F. - 16.00 CAIt:3 '-"
PRGMriED OFFICES 1:250 2880S-F It•52 OAKS --
TOTALS 115JSBOS.F. GO CALLS RE.p0
AtS..: 1•-6C• FA�IC Ma PtLGVInc :
c
WF-STr N0=H r FAST !SOUTH (ExtST.3 49 CALLS
CITY OF ITE�VI: Gf B'!i-1 l- '�AItT+. 'G1�sle,td
RAMC IO CUCAl` ONUA TITLE- SfM 116 .s �
;PLAINRIiNK' M L ION EXHIBIT:��SC-kLE- �•
t: •
4 s e�7n+c•ar� ..
. .��`•: ~t�T_ -4rcT'%:J,•�r :Y,h � '-.-.� _�_�/_[�✓;ry /�i-fir`\•'' . �?a.
�wOl��r_ .... �.r.l' it r. bbb �_r._ _/�. ��! �/,' i�V�• '". _ S
- __ '� lam.^.--�+�^,.•tiFri ��e7 � _ _ _
m ,� -� r_ _taco. .. ..e �. _' f�' �-.-�/_.• �\ 'i`, •___ : ..
� 1 t , •.• is� I
1• J �] If �" .
`:,` •., .\\. �'v1f �\ L 1, ` ,.. i V
� �� � s es •+pow . � leel w •� � '
.�i
l K)R H
CITY OF rrm: of u. 63-I I—► NF 'yG,ibr l _
PLkrgNE\K3 DrVISK)N EXHIBIT- "G'� SCALE:—
a ,ray •.o� �'.} '; i
r
e:
.`„
12,
lENGINEERING LAS
Room GFN J1 PERSON)
PERSON, (6 PERSONS)
HPERS�ONO
ti..
,1I
J
NORTH
RANCHOCITY
CUCAMONNGA a._
oj
Li I
_ �� -
v14i.067-z ai+
V
DATA-DESIGN Laboratories P.O. eox 7"
7925 CENTER AVENUE
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730
6 July 1983
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Department of Community Development
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9173,j
Gentlemen:
Data-Design herewith radkes application for a Conditional
Use Permit (non-construction) granting permission to locate
two (2) 24 ' s 60, modular office structures (office trailers)
in the rear parking lot of its Building No. 3, located at
7915 Center Avenue.
These structures will house approximately 14 persons per-
forming office and administrative functions and one (1)
® research and development technician. The normal hours of
operation will be from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. , Monday
through Friday.
Enclosed are: (1) Uniform Application; (2) Site Plan;
(3) Floor Plan; (4) Property Ownership List Labels, 3 sets;
(5) Radius Map; (6) Notification Labels; and (7) Check for
$398. 00.
If the Department has any questions regarding this appli-
cation, please contact the undersigned.
very try ly youzs,
DATA-DESGIN LABORATORIES
E. B. Alsip
Executive Assistant
EBA:mkp
kEnclosures (1) - (7)
RESOLUTION NO.
49
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING/DENYING CONDIT70NAL USE PERMIT NO. 83-11 FOR
Two TEMPORARY TRAILERS AT DATA-DESIGN LABORATORIES
LOCATED AT 792�_-' CENTER AVENUE IN THE M-R-T ZONE
WHEREAS, on the 8th day of July, 1983, a complete application was
filed by Data-Design Laboratories for review of the above-described project;
and
WHEREAS, on the 27th day of July, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the following finding-, car./cannot be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use
is proposed; and
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
ir:urious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
3. Toat the proposed use -.rill comply with each of the
applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 83-11 is approvea
subject to the Towina conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. The temporary trailers are approved for a two-year
period from the date of installation, unless
extended by the Planning Commission. However, if
the trailers are not installed within eiahteen
months this approval shal become null and voids
uniess extended by ulc Pla-Tina Commission.
2. Development of the permanent building sh li be
completed and ready for occupancy, or the trailers
shall be removed prior to expiration of the
Conditional Use Permit.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Resolution No.
Page 2
BY:
Dennis L. Stovc, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning „omission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Conmissior of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 27th day of July, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
HOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
t
8�
elf Mry^x''�'.:pC y.
rt
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA-Xi NGA o ova+tiro�o
MEMORANDUM
1^
DATE: July 27, 1983 „ i
TO- Members of the Planning ComAission 1
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
s
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planng:-
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE REVIEW •SCiiEDULE
Now that the first ccmplete draft of new n_evelopment Code is ready for
review, staff wuuld like to propose Lhe following review schedule and
strategy. Qur number one goal is to strive far final City Council
adoption of the Code by the end of this year. This means the Commission
will have to complete their review and recommendation by at least
mid-Octobe -
We realize that this is an ambitious schedule; however, we believe it is
feasible f-om the fact that much of the Code is simply reorganization
and codif`.cation of all previously adopted policies and standards.
P:-eviously, when an outside consultant had prepared a new Zoning
Ordinance, we created a subcommittee of the Commission {Zoning
Committee` to review the proposal with staff. Since the Develapt nd
Code was written by staff and the basis of the Code is from past and
existing Commission policies, we would like to forego the route of the
Zoning Committee and conduct workshops with the full Commission. We
want to avoid any duplicated efforts. The workshops will also act as a
conduit for receiving pdblic input and input from other interested
groups and agencies.
Following 's the proposed schedule and the general topic of review and
discussion:
August 1 Distribution of Code, Map, and Executive Summary to
agencies and special interest groups.
August 23 First Public hearing/workshop
Topics: Overview of Code and detailed review of Chapters
1, 2, and 3.
t
September 5 Chapters 4, 7, 8, and 9
Se;tember 19 Chapters 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, and 13
October 3 Review of Development District Map
ITEM 0
�\\ IMPOSE11 v)ay
Development Code Review Schedule
July 27, 1983
Page 2
October 12 Final public hearing, review of actions and final draft,
and recommendation to City Council
October 19 Set public hearings before the City Council
November 2 first public hearing and reading before City Council
November 16 Second pub?Ic hearing and ,•lading before City Council
final adoption
December 1 Optional City Council meeting
Staff is currentl:, preparing an Executive Summary and completing the
Development District Map. These will be distributed to all concerned by
August 1, 1983. Staff reco;--nends adoption of the above schedule, which
will then be publicized in local newspapers.
R6:MV:jr
i
r_