Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983/09/14 - Agenda PacketT .' : +1- � � 7'.. !: -��- .y - � '.. �JI � � Z k� � • �',� _�` l� V _ TT y... �'�� �', '�'. �i r q.. . 5 F.M4 s � r a H � 1 �. T .' : +1- � � 7'.. '7. crry OF > RANCHO) C :CA11,10`'G.a PI_,A.NI NIN.G C®NLMISSION AGFti1nA, 1977 WEDNESDAY September 1449 Meeting 993 .7:00 P.M. II,IONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE 11NE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA A C T 1 0 N 5 L Pledge of Allegsance IL Roll Cali Approved 5 -0 -0 Approved 5 -0 -0 Commissioner Barker X Commissioner Juarez Commissioner McNie1 —?- ffi. Am oiancements Iv. Approval of Minutes August 16, 1983 V. Consent Calendar "� &:'4 `4ZK4 Commissioner Rempel X Commissioner Stout X The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR DR 81 -08 - C/L BU16PERS - The development of an 8,249 sq. ft. int Ur Fa 0.99 acre parcel in 'The Exchange" professional office center in the C -1 zone, located on-the southeast corner of .Base Line Road and Carnelian Avenue - APN 207- 031 -29. BARRAi P - A mange of zone iron: 1t-1—O,�Vaa Wuagac rusaaaa� Residential - 8,500 sq. ft. lots) to R -3/PD (Multiple Family Residential/Planned Development) and the total development of 72 condominiums on 5.71 acres of land located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona Avenue - APN 202- 171 -42. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA September 14, 1983 Page 2 C. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10316 - %1C DANIEL - A total residential development of 9.76 acres i ito 33 lots in the R -1 zone, generally located on the northeast corner of Ramon and Church - APN 208 - 181 -06. D. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 6962 - KEY - Located on the north side of Vicara and Jasper Street - APN 1061 - •141 -06. E. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP PROPERTIES - Located on the south side east Haven Avenue - APN 209- 141 -68. VL Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the reh:ted project. PIease wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. AZI such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project- Approved 5 -0 -0 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8100 - BWLC - A division of 9.82 acres into 2 parcels within the C -2 and R -3 zones located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue - APN 1077- 621 -28, 31. (Continued from Planning Commission meeting of August 24, 1983.) Approved 5 -0 -0 with amendment to catch basinG. reqmt., parapet height to original proposal, land- scaping on N/S for single family homes and mod of pi chancel reqt. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -17 - BARMAKIAN - The development of 63 apartment units on 4.86 acres iri the R -3 zone located on the east side of Ramona, north of Foothill - APN 1077 - 621 -31 (a pe portion). (Continued from Planning Commission meeting of August 24, 1983.) Approved 5 -0 -0 with no H. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -13 - LOYAL ORDER OF time i imitation. To be MOOSE - The establishment of a Moose Lodge in a 1550 brought back automatically sq— uare foot unit of an industrial complex, in the General in 2 years for review of Industrial area (Subarea 4), located at 9375 Archibald Avenue CUP and limitation to - AFN 210 - 071 -48. 40 parking spaces. Approved 5-0 -0 with 1. CONDITIONAL USE PER,IUT 83 -16 - HAUSER - The amendment to allow dog runs expanlon of an existing pet hospitalinto a contiguous unit and boarding of animals. located at 8681 19th Street in the C -1 zone - APN 202 -024-11. Approved 5 -0 -0 J. Approved 5 -0 -0 w/ -grnt fpr wrought iron fence, wall along SPt prior to constr.% restriction of use of Castro and Eastwood during construction. L. Planning Commission Agenda September 14, 1983 Page 3 Iwil PERIDIYL' tS3-Uy - ai.in UWZi'�. -- - HiSRC - he deve opment o a 2800 square fo-ot education facility for the Alta Loma Brethreu in Christ Church an 6.8 neres of land in the R -1 -8500 zone, located at 9974 19th S'.reet - APN 202 - 171 -01. MVIEW 83-21 - 'Zd;&rLD - ." r... -- apartment units on 19.14 acres of land in the R -3 zone, listed at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue - APN 208 - 241 -25, 26. N Approved 5 -0-0 .._ - - in the R -1 zone, located s::he south side of 19th Street, east of Jasper Avenue - AP14 202 -024 -15. Approved 5 -0 -0 w/ additi�hal REVIS NS TO ENGINEERING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL regent. for homeowners assn. F B. TENTATIVE 'TRACT 12232 - L-10 I - A revision to a and prevision homeowners public custom lot residential subdivision o 204 lots on 140.98 acres access for traits in of land in the R- 1- 20,000 zone located an the east side of CCBR's Haven Avenue, north of Hillside Channel, changing pub'Ic streets to private streets - APN 201- 121 -12. VII[. Dii 120 -day time extensim N. allowed in order for ap- plicant to contact adja- cent property owners to develop master plan for circulation. - ector's Reports itME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10035 - R.H. IATES - A residential subdivision o 15.7 acres of land into 38 tom lots in the R-1 zone, locates] south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN 207 - 101 -37 & 207 -092 -10. (Continued from Planning Commission meeting of August 10, 1983.) VUL Pad ua Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. IX. Adjournment 10:55 P.M. The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations tl at set an 11 pm. adjournment time. If items go beyond that the time, they shall be heard only with the consent Commission. The Planning Commission will adjourn to a Development Code Workshop to be held at 6:30 p-m., September 20, 1983, Liens Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga. ONTARIO INTEE••TiONAL AOI/Oif N 1977 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.N,1O \GA AG .NU% Regular Meeting WEDNESDAY September 14, 1983 -7:00 P.M. LIONS PARR COj%[MUNffY CENTER 9161 BASH LUO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA L Pledge of Allegiance IL Roll Call Commissioner Barker _ Commissioner Juarez Commissioner McNiel _ 111. Anacwmcements IV. Approval of b+iinutes August 16, 1983 V. Consent Calendar Commissioner Rempel_ Commissioner Stout The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR DR 81 -08 - CiL BUILD;:--IS - The development o an 8,249 s -jft. restaurant �i a 0.99 acre parcel in "The Exchangp" professional. office center in the C -1 zone, located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Carnelian Avenue - APN 207 -031 -29. B. BARRAIT - A change oI zone zrom n -i-o, — 6 -- -- -� Residential - 8,500 sq. ft. lots) to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential/planned Development) and the total development of 72 condominiums on 5.71 acres of land located on the north side of 19th St: eet at Ramona Avenue - APN 202 - 171 -42. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA September 14, 1983 Page 2 C. TIME EXTENSION FOR TEtiTATIVE TRACT 10316 - MC DANIEL - A total residential development of 9.76 acres into 33 lots in the R -1 zone, generally located a. 'he northeast corner of Ra.:: ?ea and Church - APN 208 - 191 -06. D. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL "RAP 6962 - KEY - Lreated on the north side of Vicara and Jasper Stre_2 - APN 1061 - 141 -06. E. VI. Public Hearings [SION FOR PARCEL MAP - Located on the south side Avenue - APN 209 - 141 -68. The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. Ail such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8100 - G. L$VILt - h a1V151OR Vl y.ac nCLCD 11aw s eca a:w ..a a. u.. r and R -3 zop_es located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue - APN 1071- 621 -289 31. (Continued from Planning Commission meeting of August 24, 1983.) "VIZW 755 -11 - Zarc V1AnIft1% - 111C uuvuavvk"a .� apartment units on 4.8E acres ir_ the R -3 zone located on the east side of Ra�riona, north of Foothill - APN 1077- 621 -31 (a portion). (Continued from Planning Commission meeting of August 24, 1983.) H. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT b3 -13 - LUXAL UrLlJzrc yr MOOSE - The establishment ot a moose Lodge in a 1550 square foot unit of an industrial complex, in the General Industrial area (Subarea 4), located at 9375 Archibald Avenue - APN 210 - 071 -48. I. CONDITIONAL USE P "RN TT 83 -16 - HAUSER - The- expansion of an existing pet hospital Onto a contiguous unit located at 8681 19th Street in the C -1 zone - APN 202- 024 -11. Planning Conmission Agenda September 14, 1983 Page 3 J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND wcvusiivnn� PERMIT 83 -09 - ALTA LOMA BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH - The development of a 2800 square fWt education facility for the Alta Loma Brethren in Christ Church on 6.8 aces of land in the R -1 -8500 zone, located at 9974 19th Street - APN 202- 171 -01. 11. ENVIHUNML'NTAL A�Z001Vin11 VIEW 83-21 - SICKELS - The development oT 384 apartment units on 19.14 acres of land in the R -3 zone, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue - APN 208 - 241 -25, 26. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7000 - JAMES _II BUSE - A division o 34 acres of land into 2 lots in the R -1 zone, located on the south side of 19th Street, east of Jasper Avenue - APN 202 -024 -15. M. REVISIONS TO ENGINEERING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OR TENTATIVE TRACT 12232 - LABAND - A revision to a custom lot residential subdivision o 204 lots on 140.98 acres of land in the R -1- 20,000 zone located on the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Hillside Channel, changing public streets to private streets - APN 201- 121 -12. VII. Director's Repaets N. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TKAi;i- lvuaa -AgTCIATES - i. residential subdivision o 15.7 acres o land into 38 custom lots in the R -1 zone, located south and east of Red Hill Ccuntry Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN 207 - 101 -37 & 207 -092 -10. (Continued from Planning Commission meeting of August 10, 1983.) VIII. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear art this agenda. DL Adjournment The planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they Mali be heard only with the consent of the Commission. The Planning Commission will adjourn to a Development Code Workshop to be held at 6:30 pm., september 20, 19839 Lions Park-Community Center, 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga. t . t' CMTARIC IM fERMAMMAL am"ot crry OF RAmcHO CuCAl1k-A#rk MINUTES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLAWNISG CytNII ISSION August 16, 1983 CALL TO ORDER hairman Dennis Stout called the Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 6:35 p.m. The meeting was held in the West Gallery of the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Read, Rancho Cucamonga. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: David Barker, Addie Juarez, Larry McNiel Arrived at 6:45 p.m.), Herman Rempel, r"nnis Stout commISSIONERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner; Robert Dougherty, City Attorney; Rick Gomez, City Planner; Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner; Joan Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Rick Marks, Associate Planner; Michael Vairin, Senior Planner MEETING OBJECTIVE Chairman Stout opened the meeting stating that the Commission would complete an overview of the Draft Development Code to gain an understanding of its basic Chaptersn 1, 2 and andhow I was formulated; 3 to reath a consensusand, on oa y complete changesdetailed review the proposed draft. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, stated that it was the hope of staff that input would be received from the Commission and from the public on the areas reviewed at this meeting. Mr. Vairin provided copies of the Development Code to the audience for their use at this meeting and explained how the Development Code was formulated. Mr. Vairin stated that the basic goal of the Development Code, as staff saw it, was to create a document which would combine various land use policies and development goals which would be the Development Code. He indicated that over beecombi edVeintoa this Code. Y has Further, that rthis document would which would the general goals and objectives of the General Plan making them clearer and more easily understood. Mr. Vairin stated that the City has already adopted an Industrial Specific Plan, Planned Community documents for Terra Vista and Victoria and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Development Code would regulate the area of the City not covered by the other specific plan documents, that is, the area west of Haven. Mr. Vairin stated that the Draft Development Code contains 13 chapters made up of administrative procedures and general l -ind use controls and guidelines. Further, that the Commission would be examining chapters 1, 2 and 3 at this meeting. Mr. Vairin stated that the City Attorney would be working with the Commission and staff on an•+ substantive changes that would be made. He explained that the procedure for review would be to have each subsection discussed by the Commission with input from the audience and then have the Commission arrive at consensus for each subsection. Rick Gomez, City Planner, followed the outline format for discussion, beginning with Section I.I. Following its review, there were no changes. Section 1.2 - Rick Gomez explained the Development Districts. Chairman Stout directed a question to the City Attorney following Mr. Gomez' presentation asking if the Code is being adopted as an ordinance item would the map be separate or should it be incorporated by reference so that it would be one document. Mr. Dougherty replied that you normally have the map separated from the changes with the text because it is more convenient to take it up as two separate documents. He indicai-ed that the Development Code is a one time shot and they are, in effect, rpyz Ong the map but he would have a more definitive answer for Mr. Stout. Commissioner Barker questioned 64 under Applicability when there is a small lot with a lot line boundary and the developer does not know what to do. Mr. Gomez stated that staff would then do an analysis based on the General Plan designation and the applicability and that they will try to eliminate such a problem. Mr. Gomez stated further than on smaller lots staff will come back to the Commission and ask for a clean up. Mr. Vairin stated that they :gill try to avoid smaller lots as much as possible and there are only a few pieces where larger parcels are divided that way. He explained the reason for statement B4 in that there are larger lots which must be governed in this way. Commissioner Juarez asked who makes the determination of the district in which a land division will be placed. Mr. Vairin explained that it will be determined by staff. Mr. Gomez stated that although staff will make the determination it is under the confines of the General Plan map. Commissioner Stout asked if the Commission would feel more comfortable if there were an additional definition that states if a lot is too small, it would not be split. Commissioner Barker stated that it is his understanding that this will come before the Planning Commission for determination and asked if it would be appropriate to put policy in at this point. P.C. Minutes 2 August 16, 1983 Chairman Stout asked if there were some rules on drawing boundaries. Mr. Dougherty stated that when you deal with small scale maps you sometimes have difficulty with the size of the lot. Mr. Gomez stated -chat this is adequately addressed and it would be the policy of staff to bring determination on small lots to the Commission. Commissioner Rempel stated that items 2 and 3 under Applicability should become the last items in the section since they deal only with adoption. He felt these would drop out of the Code within the next 2 -3 years. Mr. Dougherty stated that from the standpoint of organization they are not the same thing because they deal with development rather than interpretation and it will apply in the future because of the potential of zone changes with previously approved subdivisions. He stated, however, that they could be placed at the end. Commissioner Juarez asked what happens if a developer comes to you with a project and the Development Code is not yet adopted. Mr. Gomez replied that they will be governed by the existing ordinance. Further, i they planning develop what time could examine the Draft Development Code see the new ref nementare Commissioner Juarez asked if when the Development Code becomes effective will submitted developments have to meet the new code. r;r. Gomez replied that is correct. Commissioner Juarez asked if extensions would be governed by the new code. Mr. Vairin replied that they will have the same requirements they now have. if Mr. Gomez stated that the Commission has the discretion to look at t hasuch they feel there should be a change, and, of working with the app a situation. Further, that staff or the Commission will not mandatorily make a change but under certain circumstances there may be an issue that the Commission feels is important enough and an exception could be made. Commissioner Barker asked for clarification of B7 in Applicability Chairman Stout asked if there were any questions from the audience. Ms. Kay Matlock of Lewis Homes asked if B3 means if a subdivision has been approved and then extended it must meet the new code. Mr. Vairin replied that it does not affect the subdivision ordinance which sets up the ti--e limits from initial approval. He explained the existing time limitations of the subdivision map. Mr. Gomez stated that the key sentence is that it must be in conformance at the time of approval. P.C. Minutes 3 August 16, 1983 There were no further comments on Section 1.2. Chairman Stout went on to Section 1.3 - Conflicts and Clarifications Rick Gomez explained what the intent of this section is. Commissioner Barker asked under B of th ,•. `ion, if once the Commission sets forth an interpretation is it a livinc ;;c ..•,:_�t, can they keep changing their mind or is that it. Mr. Dougherty replied that normally the interpretation is that it is a document that sets a precedent; however, even the Supreme Court can change its mind and overrule itself so different Planning Commissions can take a different approach. Mr. Vairin stated that there could always be an ordinance amendment which would be ,lone by the City Council. Mr. Dougherty stated that once resolution of a problem is made, the next time the text is amended any charges would be incorporated. There were no further comments on Section 1.3. Section 1.4 - Use Determination Mr. Gomez explained -his section to the Commission. Chairman Stout asked Mr. Dougherty about the necessity of mak4ng findings. Mr. Dougherty replied that generally you should have findings on uses that are similar to and not more objectionable than other uses. Chairman Stout stated that perhaps such language should be added. Commissioner FcNiel stated that under Item D, Determination „ it reads that it shall be effective in 14 calendar days. He asked if this becomes effective in 14 calendar days or is effective in 14 business days. He fe',t there should be some clarification. Chairman Stout asked about the consistency of calendar days versus business days. Mr. Vairin replied that the Code would be consistent in its language. Section 1.5 - City Planner Rick Gomez explained the responsibilities for this title. Chairman Stout asked Mr. Gomez if one of the responsibilities not mentioned in the title is bringing certain items or issues to the attention of the Planning Commission for determination as they relate to the Development Code. Mr. Gomez replied that those responsibilities would be under 3 and also under the amendment to initiate action or to bring items to the Commission's P.C. Minutes 4 August 16, 1983 attention. Chairman Stout stated that he was looking for some specific language that would deal with this. Commissioner Barker stated that he thought he knew what Chairman Stout is talking abcut but was unable to think of an example. Commissioner Rempel stated that as City Planner he can bring any item to the Planning Commission through the Development Code because it gives him all the authority necessary. Chairman Stout stated that in sections such as the reapplication process, it appears to deal with things rather than people and it is an important part of what the City Planner does. He indicated that he would like to see it more people oriented. Section 1.6 - Amendments Mr. Gomez explained this section to the Commission. Mr. Vairin stated that the City attorney has indicated it is unnecessary to have a finding as the Government Code does not require one. Further, the City Attorney suggested eliminating the word finding as long as a reason is stated. Mr. Dougherty Explained that the adoption of text of the zoning ordinance or amendment to the zoning map is a legislative act. Further, variances and use permits are also adm:nstrative acts where findings are required. He advised the Commission not to get trapped in their own ordinance. Commissioner Rempel stated that the only area that he would have problems with is item L, pre - districting, which may take some rewriting. He indicated that the wording should state pre - districting will be done only upon application and not arbitrarily by the City. Further, that it should be initiated on an annexation application rather than by the City. Mr. Gomez stated that staff intends to work with LAFCO's annexation procedures which only allows pre - districting prior to annexation. Commissioner Rempel stated that this should be spelled out in the Code so that on the annexation application it does not appear that the City is arbitrarily changing the zoning. Mr. Vairin explained for clarification that pre - districting is comniting a zone whereby when an area is annexed it will become the designated zone but will not take effect until the annexation occurs. Mr. Gomez stated that this is a policy decision. He further stated that staff was trying to provide a procedure for pre- districting upon annexation as provided by law. Commissioner Rempel stated that somewhere it should say that this takes effect upon application. P.C. Minutes 5 August 16, 1983 Commissioner Juarez asked if the action of the City Council is calendar days or working days. Mr. Gomez replied that it is calendar days. Kay Mat'ock of Lewis Homes co,amented on Item J under 1.6 stating that it would appear that there could be some cases where circumstances can change and produce a hardship. She felt that a waiver of some kind is needed for those instances. Mr. Dougherty replied that this statement :s traditionally of this sort and it is certainly a reasonable requiremi preclude a city council or planninn commission initiated determine that waiting one year is not appropriate. Mr. that this statement is in the code to prevent an applicant change. shown in ordinances ant which would not change should they Dougherty indicated from initiating the Commissioner Rempel stated that if coniiiions do change it gives the applicant the right to come in earlier. Mr. Vairin stated that the wording is to prevent an applicant from again submitting the same project after having Just gone through an appeal. He indicated that this has actually occurred. Commissioner Barker asked who determines the substantiality. Mr. Vairin replied that staff does. Commissioner McNiel stated that it is backwaras. Further, that what this says is that a person cannot reapply within a year. Mr. Vairin replied that if he asks for the same thing, he cannot reapply. The consensus of the Commission was to leave the language in Section 1.5 as it is with the exception of Item J. Section 1.7 - Revisions /Modifications Mr. Gomez stated that upon the advice of the City Atiorney, this section would be modified and would contain only modifica` �:.:.s cr revisio:is of site plans, landscaTM_ plans or grading plans. He indicated that those revisions such as are found under E -i would go under the Conditional Use Permit section. Chairman Stout asked when the revised language would be ready. Mr. Gomez stated that this would be brought back to the Commission at their next meeting on the Development Code. Commissioner Rempel stated that ne has a lot of problems with section B. Mr. Vairin stated that we can drfine these and work with them so that they are clear and so that the groundruies are known. Section 1.8 - Appeals P.C. Minutes 6 August 15, 1983 An alternative to the Appeals Appeal as d be established. Thiswaspbrought up by made whereby a ocar., „f App - - -s the City Attorney for discussion purposes to the Planning Commission. Mr. Dougherty stated that the City Planner would be called the Zoning A::ninistrator and the Planning Commission the Board of Zoning Appeal. Mr. Dougherty stated further that this is the interpretation in the Government Code but it is subject to approval by the City Council. In addition, Mr. Dougherty stated that his recommendation is to have only the City Planner appeal to the Planning Certnission and all initial decisions by the Planning Commission would be appealable to the City Council. stated Mr. Gomez that this is a the Board of Appeal r if one s policy set, appeal to the City Council. set up Mr. Dougherty stated that the words "aggrieved party" would be used throughout the text where it applied to the appeal. process. Steve Wheatley asked if what was being said is that an appeal of a planner decision ceild not be appealed to the City Council. Mr. Gomez replied that the current proposal is that it is appealed to the Planning Commission and then to the City Council. He indicated that the City Attorney is discussing the option under state law that a decision could be appealed to the Board of Appeals and that decision would be final and not appealable to the City Council and those would be only the decisions of the City Planner as administrative decisions. Mr. Wheatley stated that anyone should be able to appeal to their elected representatives. Chairman Stout stated that the City Council should be made aware of this option and that it is a decision they should make. Mr. Gomez stated that this section will be left as it is with the exception of the minor word changes. Section 1.9 - Approval to Run with the land or Applicant Mr. Vairin ted that the land City ttc not the mendeduo at approvals should be Chairman Stout asked if CUP's should only run with th° land. Mr. Dougherty replied that it should run with the land decisions it might be struck down if it does not. doesit not sconplydyou would a have the power to jerk Further, the CUP should be transferable. ihairman Stout stated that he has a slightly different feel about that in tha:. a CUP is like putting someone on probation. He indicated that the person obtaining a CUP has been told what the conditions of approval are and as far as alienating that use they know exactly the way things are. Further, it is and based on past court He indicated that the you get an operator who the CUP and revoke it. Z Aurgust 16, 1983 P.C. Minuses like a contractual thing between the applicant and the City. He stated that he agreed with the analogy but that there are certain things that should not run, with the land. Mr. Dougherty stated that the CUP sets such things as hours of operation and the use is not dependent upon the identity of the owner, and here, arguably, you are making the conditional use permit dependent upon the identity of the owner. Counissioner Barker stated that this is what the Planning Commission did specifically on arcades when it set forth conditions about who was operating and what the hours of operation would be. Mr. Dougherty replied that they have had a difficult time defending specific ordinances, especially some from the County, which were bad. Chairman Stout stated the language should be changed so that everything runs with the land with the exception of conditional use permits. Commissioner Rempel stated that this also applies to the Alpha Beta. After brief discussion the consensus of the Commission was to work on the language for review of this section at the next Development Code meeting. Commission Rempel stated that what they may be looking at is licensing rather than a conditional use permit. Chairman Stout stated he feels strongly about people who promise to do something and then sell the business to someone who doesn't comply with the regulatirns. Mr. Dougherty stated that one way to nail down this problem is to list the uses that are sensitive and have then run with the operator. Chief Feuerstein of the Foothill Fire Protection District stated that :f a person buys a business in a center that is under a CUP and then changes the use totally, without being aware of it, he is automatically under violation of the code. He asked if there is some process that would make the person aware of the CUP such as at the time he buys his license. Mr. Vairin explained the checks and balances in the system of business licenses_ Mr. Dougherty stated that the purpose of the business license is solely to raise revenue and they are under no obligation to specify any land use provisions to the person who is purchasing the license. Audience response on this was that what conditions are imposed on ore individual running a business should be the same for another in the same kind of situation., should be based en case and not personality, and should also run with the land. 8:55 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. P.C. Minutes 8 August 16, 1983 9:05 p.m. The Planning Commission reconve:._d. Section 1.10 - Lapse of Approval and Extensions Chairman Stout stated it appears there is no maximum limitation in this section. Mr. Gomez explained that it is shown in Section 8 as a maximum of 4 years. Kay Matlock of Lewis Homes felt that item B, requirement of notification 60 days prior to an expiration date could be a time for the applicant to trip on a deadline. She felt that there should be an opportunity for a waiver of that condition if cause is shown. Ms. Matlock stated that under finding requirements to grant an extension, there could be other good reasons than only those listed. Mr. Dougherty stated that finding requirements one and two could be eliminated; however, 3 is mandatory in any case. Chairman Stout asked if there are other kinds of findings that could be made. Mr. Vairin replied that you really don't have to have finding one, that two and three are all you need if you want an extension. Commissioner Barker stated you can just say they can have four years. Commissioner Rempei stated that if there is a new Planning Commission, they can change the land use all around a parcel so that it would be nonconforming and no matter what happens they can use their entitlement. Mr. Vairin stated that the Commission has been dealing with time extensions and that is why this was suggested. Chairman Stout stated that there is no way to insulate against something like this because sometimes people want change. The consensus of the Commission was to strike finding number one. Section 1.11 - Business License Mr. Gomez informed the Commission they may wish to strike this section. Mr. Dougherty stated that this section flies in the face of the Governbment Code. Further, that the Finance Department has some concern in g::ttin; involved in this and that some appropriate statement is needed regarding the business license procedure. Mr. Gomez stated that they are leaning more towards administrative control rather than regulatory control. Chairman Stout stated he did not feel an applicant for a business license should be told =hat there is a Planning Department and a Finance Department and never the twain shall meet. He understands, he said, that the business license purpose is for revenue gathering but felt that the City owes the P.C. Minutes 9 August 16, 1983 applicant :.me responsibility to tell him what the limitations are to any business application. He indicated tht they ought to know that a business license does not give them permission to always do what they want to do. Mr. Dougherty replied that the City owes then, a respgnsibility but not applicability, Their peril, he said, is if they do not look into the law. He felt that a handout that describes the business license or lack of effect could be given to the applicant at the time of application. Mr. Gomea stated that he does not want to leave the imnpression that the departments are not working together. This was an attempt to provide information to people upfront. Chairman Stout stated that when he made that comment he did not mean to imply tha either. Before he got involved in government he did not know what a Planning Commission was or what the functions of the various departments were. His only concern, he said, is that people be informed. Mr. Vairin stated that this section is being revised more in keeping with the discussion that has taken place. Section 1.12 - Public Hearings and Notification Mr. Vairin asked the Commission to strike the word invite in Item G5 of this section and insert the word encourage. Commissioner Barker stated that he would again say that he felt 300 feet as the area of notification is inadequate. Mr. Vairin replied that the notification process is taken on a case -5y -case basis and that sometimes notices are even handed out. Commissioner Rempel did not feel that the distance limitation of 300 feet was a problem based en the number of people who find out about projects. Chairman Stout felt that section 1.12 should contain a policy statement that the purpose of notification is to encourage as much citizen participation as possible. He indicated that the Commission's job is to make sure the maximum number of people cane forward and participate. Commissioner Rempel stated that he felt what is being said is adequate. Commissioner Barker stated he would support Chairman Stout. Commissioner McNiel did not feel a policy statement is necessary. Commissioner Juarez felt that what the present statement says is adequate. The consensus of the Commission was not to change the policy statement. Section 1.13 - Code Enforcement Mr. Gomez stated that Section 1.13A should be - removed from the Development Code and placed in the Municipal Code. Section "f.13B would then be kept P.C. Minutes 10 August 16, 1983 regarding the Noise Abatement procedures. Chairman Stout asked if code enforcement would be mentioned in the Development Code. Mr. Gomez replied that it would not as it would be contained in the Municipal Code. A person in the audience asked how the interior noise reading would be taken. Mr. Gomez replied that it would be taken with a decibel meter from the interior area if there is a problem with an adjacent land use. Kay Matlock asked for clarification on where commmercial would be in zone 2 if it is in the planned community. Mr. Gomez replied that it would have to adhere to the standards as listed in the commercial property. After discussion, it was the consensus of the Commission to change the starting time in paragraph 6B to 6:30 a.m. Section 1.14 - Non - Conforming Uses and Structures Mr. Dougherty stated that this is one of the most touchy areas of land use regulations. Further, that once a use has been established the courts have determined that there is a vested right even though regulations change. Mr. Dougherty recommended that Items F. G and H might well be considered for elimination and that the Code stick with what has traditionally been done. Commissioner Rempel stated that without going into the City Attorney's comments, court costs, etc., from the standpoint of saying you can't have that carport beside your home anymore because it is non - conforming, these areas are beyond the bounds of where the City should go. Commissioner Rempel stated that in the area of restoration of damaged structures the Commission would have to be extremely careful because some insurance policies require that unless the structure is rebuilt you would be unable to collect on your policy. Commissioner Juarez asked if you can say substantial damage. Mr. Dougherty stated that it is something you cannot regulate or determine. Mr. Gomez stated that you could not intensify the use only bring it back to its former use. Mr. Dougherty stated that he was able to see Commissioner Rempel's point regarding insurance; however, you could cod are is don't o anal them when indicated that you don't eliminate people, y just they quit. He indicated that you would get rid of most non - conforming land uses solely by attrition. Chairman Stout stated that he does not see any purpose in the amortization P.C. Minutes 11 August 16, 1983 section and suggested that it be deleted. It was the consensus of the Commissoin to delete this section. Chairman Stout felt there shold be an escape clause when you give an ordinance waiver and make it a nonconforming use as suggested by Commissioner Rempel in the restoration of damaged structures section. Mr. Vairin explained that the exact example of what Chairman Stout was talking about will be found in Chapter 4 of the Code. Mr. Dougherty stated that there is another way to handle this and it is through the variance process. Chairman Stout felt that a hardship provision should be inserted and leave the section as it is. Commissioner Rempel felt that an arbitrary point of 50 percent is not good and felt that the wording should be "if a structure is destroyed", instead, He indicated further that a dollar figure would not be workable either. Mr. Dougherty replied that rarely do you find something totally destroyed. Mr. Barker stated that a percentage would be all right if it can be evaluated. Commissioner Juarez stated she would fee' comfortable with a percentage figure but aid not name one. Commissioner McNiel stated he has no way of determining what destroyed means until the attorneys oet ahold of it. He stated he is comfortable with 50 percent. Section 1.15 - Definitions . _ Lyndon Harp felt that the section under animals dealing with birds should be rewritten. Mr. Gomez replied that the letter he had written will be used to incorporate some of the changes Mr. Harp suggested and will be brought back to the Commission. Ms. Matlock stated that she would review her suggested changes with staff. 9:10 a.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 9:20 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. Sections 2.1 and 2.2 - Purpose and Intent and Permit Applications Mr. Gomez indicated that there will be some adjustments in language as recommended by the City Attorney in order to conform to State mandates. Sections 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5 - Conditional Use Permits, Variances and Minor Variances P.C. Minutes 12 August 16, 1933 Mr. Gomez stated that these are all procedures in the new code that have been in existing ordinances and the interim ordinance. He stated that what the sections say is that the City would conform with state law and that this is what the City has administratively adopted for itself and incorporated in the Development Code. Mr. Gomez further stated that sections 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 are similar in structure outlining the application and authority, purpose and intent, etc. 'there was discussion on the definition of minor variance. Mr. Dougherty explained that there is no such thing as a minor variance. Chairman Stout asked if the enforcement section is coming out of all sections. Mr. Gomez replied affirmatively. There were no further comments on these sections. Section 2.6 - Home Occupations There +eve no comments on this section.. Section 2.7 - Temporary Uses Commissioner Rem�el asked if the Commission was going to get into fees on trailers for construction purposes. Mr. Vairin indicated that none are intended and that this section is just for the administration of construction or contractor trailers. He indicated, however, that there are Fees for model homes. Commissioner Rempel indicated he felt the construction offices should not be in the same category. Mr. Vairin replied that he tends to agree with Commiss' ^her Rempel. Commissioner Rempel stated that with regard to the Temporary Use Permit. a sales office may be located in a garage, trailer or dwelling, and he fe% it can't be a continued use as a sales office once the units are built. Chairman Stout stated that with regard to the name on temporary uses there recently had been a long discussion on that with the recreational vehicle parking lot in the Industrial Specific Plan. He indicated he wanted to be sure that the same term is being used. Chapter 3 - Section 3.1 - Development /Design Review Mr. Vairin explained provisions of Sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3. Commissioner Rempel asked if there will be provisions for anything less than 4 units. Mr. Vairin stated that this is covered in Section-3.2, subsection 2. P.C. Minutes 13 August 16, 1983 Commissioner Barker asked about page 56, item 3lb and page 62, item Clf, relative to a developer saying he wants to make just a little change. Mr. Gomez replied that this is covered in Section 1.7 where the Commission will be dealing with use and definition as to what is a minor change and what comes before t'-a Desian Review Committee or the Planning Commission. Commissioner Barker stated that on page 58 the responsibilities of the Design Review Corenittee are not entirely clear. Mr. Coleman suggested a flow chart showing authority relative to type of projects. There were no further comments on this section. Section 3.3 - Residential Land Development Design Review System Chairman Stout suggested that the title of this section also include Growth Management since it is being consolidated into this section. Commissioner McNiel asked if it could be put in as a sub heading. Mr. Gomez replied that it can be placed in the title. There being no further continents, it was moved by Barker, seconded by Juarez, carried unanimously, to adjourn. 9:55 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez Actin? Secretary li P.C. Minutes 14 August 16, 1983 2 E. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1983 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner 1977 SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR DR 81 -08 - C/L BUILDERS - The development of an -8,249 square foot restaurant on a 0.99 acre parcal in "The Exchange" professional office center in the C -1 zone located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Carnelian Avenue - APN 207 - 031 -29. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a t as described above. The project consists of located on an existing building pad north along the Base Line Road street frontage. approved on March 11, 1981 for twelve months 18 -month extension to the current e:_diration ime extension for DR 81 -08, a restaurant building to be of the Exchange building, The project was originally and subsequently granted an date of September 11, 1983. The current policy is to allow a four year approval, with the appropriate extensions. If the Commission choses to approve the applicant's request, a time extension up to eighteen (18) months may be granted. In this case, since 18 months remain of the four year maximum, it is suggested that a final extension be granted for the full eighteen months. ANALYSIS: A review of the project indicated that the site plan is consistent with current development standards. In addition, the architectural elevations as shown on the attachments appear to meet the current design standards. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a final eighteen (18) month extension be granted for this project. The new expiration date would be March 11, 1985, City Planner M CJ:jr s ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Time Extension for OR 81 -08 - C/L Builders September 14, 1983 Page 2 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Illustrative Site Plan Exhibit "0" - Elevations Exhibit "E" - Elevations Letter from Applicant Requesting Extension Planning Commission Resolution 81 -08 with Conditions March 11, 1981 Planning Commission Minutes E CJ •r iris: i P ~ == Iruilln111L Iu1 n Inl�n nr � � �. tr �n�ri►a ,�� �tal uilppul ■ f f'•s� f���� a��f II11 /11 /111 /1111 1 11111/I rr 111111111 / /I1i11 +�ffaa��� ■■+mot Mll a. •• - f� afl fl l:•� . J� \ mot? �ii�.�t� C�11111fl111111 'UPI .•may �� ♦� � r ���`���_�-f'.a. pr10 111�Ilnlgp to • ;� �•� ��ti�i �unnuul .• • ME O �d IAA •ice. H 1�. d s e { r j.. rV NUItTH 0 CITY OF ITEM: CaL 'U___¢L7.� RANCHO CUCANI�). \(j�� TETE -1:= S�'r� t�t,ArR� � PLANNING DI \IISK?V I YI IIBIT: _5 _ SCNLE ° H p ti :jf IT FA LNCSWE LEGe4D CITY OF lk:\.NCI',C) CUCANIONGTtk TITLE IPAgMtI� PLANNING DIVISIUN ILXI 1111IT- C sc--\I-E- cl � NORTH st l s r= Fill, 11 C a$ 1 �. F CITY OF ���� VZ"EW si.-y4 I ANCI-IO CUC:ktiIO \G.-, TITLI aLc- VA-UoNs PLAi<NI \G UIVISUNI '* \I iI IT= 1^2y - --K— SCALE- 7. G1LC• - — -- 11 Ll E 11 � >ƒ ! i | � | ; �\ )§ \� 0 � . ! \ •�` � { t , i | � crry OF !TN! 2zscm� gae4l s \� Rr \CHO CUC\\!O\ IA TMp _ PLANNING vb"x ElmIT;e Sc-tLE- C /L, INC. :0:'+SR'im fv DFVE: rPdENT DEPT. AUtG Z11 6IS3 ,•cy4 Pr.� - `g��l °1�IL1�1212ws4sa16 i August 25, 1983 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Planning Division Re: DR 81 -08, Baseline 5 Carnelian Dear Sir: I have been notified that Director Review No, 81-08, a 8,249 sq.ft. restaurant site at "The Exchange ", will expire on September 11, 1983. I would like to request the maximum extension of time available for this site. As you know, this site is a "build to suit" parcel and we have yet to secure a tenant. Enclosed please find a check for $62.00 to cover the extension fee. Thank you for your consideration in this mattez. JC /mlh Enclosure Sincerely, C/ DILDERS -D OPERS, I?1C. Si Crowell President BUILDERS - DEVELOPERS 521 No. Miwntain Ave_, Suite A • Upland, California 91786 • Telephone (71A) 981 -1041 11 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -28 A RESOLUTION OF THE =;CY.O CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DIRECTOR. REVIEW NO. 81 -08 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE AND CARNELIAN. WHEREAS, on the 6th day of February, 1981, a complete application was filed and received from Croweil /Leventhal fer review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of March, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above- described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolvad as follows: SECTION 1: That the follcwing findings have been made: That the site indicated by the development plan is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use, and loadingcsandpother featurese required rb yn this asection. I. 2. That the improvements as indicated or. the development plan are located in such a manner as to be properly related to existing and proposed streets and highways. 3. That the improvements as shown on the development plan are consistent with all adopted standards and policies as set forth in this section. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on March 11, 1981. SECTION 3: That Director Review No. 81 -08 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached standard conditions: 1. That the detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall conform to the conceptual landscaping as shown on the illustrative site plan. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 1931- PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Resolution No Page 2 81 -28 Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly int.oduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Co=ission held on the 11th day of March, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSION =RS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, ',.ing, Rempel, Dahl None To! stoy J 11 0 �I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject: Applicar Locatior Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development �I. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. —/3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Buildino Permit issuance_ 0 _ 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. 5 Mail boxes, 'in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the. Firs Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. - All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally —Z- integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. 10. Prior to any use of the project sita or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Cotsnmunity Development. l � 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall. adversely affect adjacent properties. 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and appreved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. 15. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. _ 17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit. _ 19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. _ 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. _ 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Eire Protection District. 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximun; slopes, Physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. _ 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenanr_e of equestrian trails. 1. - _ 25. This project shall prov•ude percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of -the project. Prcof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. 8. Parking and vehicular Access Z. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shail contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. a002. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 2 (ofeet wide. �4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 40000 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. _ 5. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. _ 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. S. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. _ 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. Landscaoing Z1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the Proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. U 3. Existin; Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Piannina Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree -for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at ar. average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20o -24" box or larger, 700 -15 gallon, and IN -5 gallon. /6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition_ An the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shail be seeded with native grasses upon completion of gradin * or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. 3. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits, 5. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 11_ A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. 12_ Special landscape features such as - .=ding, alieivial rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along IF DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE'VFLOPMENT STANDARD CC1::DiT10NS Subject: • ���lJ Applicant: C. Gi► Location: Those items checked are conditions of approval. U, APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVIS16ii FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development _Z1. Site shall be developed in accordance ::ith the approved site plans on file and the conditions contained herein. El in the Planning UAv S 0n 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions cf approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. —Z 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. Z 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. g. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to iss!gnre cf building permits. —Z 9. All roof appurtenances, integrated, shielded fr( and streets as required 10. Prior to any use of the thereon, all conditions the satisfaction of the including air conditioners, shall be architecturally )m view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties by the Planning and Building Divisions. project site or business activity being commenced of approval contained herein shall be completed to Director of Commur.ity Development. _ 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. _ 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the de:elopment to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Officiai prior to occupancy of the first unit. 16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each .nit in this project. 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit. 19. All units within this development shall be prepiumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insuiat;on, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. _ 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout tha tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to acid approved by the City Planner prior tc approval and recordation of the final map. 24. Tnis tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. G D, ;ions 'i . Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Nanning Division prior to installation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are net approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Approvals Required 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 11 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change anal /or Variance /Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of months) at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. 5. The developer is required to obtain the followiry signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract , on , I have read —the & R.'s and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be -.`ilea by the developer wit' the City prior to occupancy. 6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District •-within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification fron the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the .p• roposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Co:unity Devel^plent_ Such letter gust hav e b e en issued b the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. S. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits iz.cued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of '�'-is project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Ccmmissi: -% 9. This subdi— lion was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING CONDITIONS: Site Development _Z1. The applicant shall comply Uniform Mechanical Code, U all other applicable codes of this project. DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, aiform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, an and ordinances in effect at the time of approval 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. _ 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. �5. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year frem the date of project approval. _Z6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. n U f ?. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. 8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures Provide ccmp��ance w�ui lnc Vu Vow uu� u.-sy • -• r -r-. ___ -_ - f considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing building(s) shalt be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be re.aoved, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code_ H. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in subs` ial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. ® A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading pla:, shall bF. subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Bu'7ding Divisions and sl!all be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whic ^ever comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the feiiowing missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on ® additional feet on additional feet on J F l 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. _ 4. Ail rights ,f vehicular ;ngress to and egress from shall be dedicated as ful10ws: _ 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring a =cess to ail parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. - _ 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. Street Improvements 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C_ pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: S7ET tiAtitE P._' CURB & . GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE 1 STREET 1 APPR. j LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL ' CHAIR RAMPS OTHER I 1 ' 1 Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be ,obtained from. the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any cther permits required. _ 4. Street improvement plans aoprovtJ by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment p. -mit. 5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfactior, of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guarznteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the reap or the issuance of building permits, whichever tomes first. 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. K. Drainaqe and Flood Control t 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: 3 The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A dra•Inaee channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, comm.ercia3 type drive approaches, roller' street connections, flood protection walis', and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. L. Utilities 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV_ 2, Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. 4. Deve',rper shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County ldater District (CCdD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation.. _ 5 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any require:rents that may be received from them. M. General Recuirements and Approvals 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: _ A. Caltrans`or: B. County Dust Abatement trequired. prior to issuance of a grading permit) C. San Bernardino County Flood Control' District D. Other: _ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, siiall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. 3 Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intenzion to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. the engineering cysts involved in Districts Forme ±ion shall be borne by the developer. 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. 11 n L.J DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -08 - C/L BUILDERS - DEVELOPERS - The development of an 8,249 sq. ft. restaurant on a .99 acre parcel in the "Exchange" professional office center in the C -1 z--c, located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Carnelian avenue. APN 207- 031 -29. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report stating that there will be 31 parking spaces left to allow the building of an office pad. Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed- Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by King, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 31 -28, with the conditions of approval. AYES: C0i'MI SSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: SCERA.NKA, KING, REMPEL, DASL NONE ABSZNT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY -carried- Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by King, carried unanimously, to continue the °oothili Corridor Study to March 25, 1981. J& Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, to go beyond the 11 p.m. cur f ew. L� N. STREET NAMriG POLICY M ion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to adop the Street Naming Resolution No. 81 -29 with zhanges on page 2 to have ues changed to streets and streets to averues_ Comaissione .ng asked what happens to streets that intersect perpendicularly and then jogs c =r as continuing the same name. Mr. Hogan replied N;'at it would not be continued. AILS: NOES: ABS E.'v i : COML II SSIONERS : RIED4PEL, DA., KING, SCERANKA NONE Motion: Moved by King, seconded by Scer beyond the 11 p.m. curfew. Planning Commission. Minutes -18- - carried -- carried unanimously, t:) go 11, 1981 i7 [1 [1 11 E. 04% RESOLUTION NO. '61" A RESOLUTIOS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -08 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND CARNELIAN AVENUE WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 61.0219(N)88 of the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, tht Plenning Commission previously approved the above - described project. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following f—'nd` gs: A. That prevailing economic conditions and interest rates have caused a distressed market climate for this project. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to construct the project at this time. C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2• time extension for' PROJECT The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a APPLICANT DR 81 -08 CIL GUILDERS EXPIRATION MARCH 11, 1985 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8Y: Dennis L. Stout, Ltiairman Resolution. No. Page 2 ATTEST Secretary of the P arming Commission I, JAC: iAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passel, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Ranchn Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 193 , by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: "TOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 11 L] 0 E DATE: 70: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 14, 1983 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Rick Gomez, City Planner Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner 4.R NE - A total deveiopTenT OT /C LWdUUuuuIuiuZ +.•— acres oT land in the R -3 /P6 zone located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona Avenue - APN 202 - 171 -42. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a time extension for Tract as described above. The site is located east of Archibald Avenue on the north side of 19th Street adjacent to the Fredrick's apartment project currently being constructed. The expiration date for this project is currently October 28, 1983. ANALYSIS: Tentative tracts in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are valid for a maximum of four (4) years, with a ^nropriate extensions per the Subdivision Map Act. This tract was origi,-,dily approved for twenty -four mr —is on October 28, 1981, and is now eligible for the first of two possible twelve -month extensions. A copy of the Resolution of Approval with Conditions and Planning Cornaission Minutes of the October 28, 1981 meeting are attached for your review. A review of the tentative tract map and plot plan indicated that the project is consistent with development standards. Also, building elevations appear to meet the current design standards. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a twelve (12) month extension be granted or Tract 1185'3. The new expiration date would be October 28, 1984. ResLctAlly sub;nitted, City Planner Attachments: C t Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "0" - Tract Map Exhibit "E" - Elevations Letter From Applicant Requesting Extension Resolution of Approval with Conditions Planning Commission Minutes - October 28, 1981 Time Extension Resolution of- Approval ITEM B w TENTATIVE TRACT NO 11853 SITE UTILIZATION AND RADIUS MAP •..Pa. . fl. R. ft � uN... rr. A A w.a. as N (OYf - n.w .• •� O ft � uN... rr. A A e 0 IL wr. y J ' =i O � u p V/ p • • Ii p • ciJ_ 4Y 2 a • i • I G O • �� O 5 � p • a Ole 1 , Q .�A -fV a.n lY �i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiVIO \'GA PLANNI,NG DIVISION t IT£I\'I:Z`' TITLE:.Le� iNt Ff M. EXHIBIT: W SCALE: wr-5 BONN 0. •� O I e 0 IL wr. y J ' =i O � u p V/ p • • Ii p • ciJ_ 4Y 2 a • i • I G O • �� O 5 � p • a Ole 1 , Q .�A -fV a.n lY �i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiVIO \'GA PLANNI,NG DIVISION t IT£I\'I:Z`' TITLE:.Le� iNt Ff M. EXHIBIT: W SCALE: wr-5 BONN 0. R p / .L UNfi CtTNF%7UP�T10N aetw mvm V{ 49 Q TASMATON WE a A V !C TOTAL Mrs Ta O[MS" 13 MAC SM0040 COar•AW •a.saau- Teae Sc% .,rwar~..•.. p.p.... te.W u. .tae ata oaLTT s m aTA]a u- a.a AC u a wn pap • as as w a papa ac aa•n ag ra N v•n% TOTU, la •OT s .Ae<Mp MAT•O OIRaT 40.<11 b TOM- IT- WTa}a-<:TT ap.�.yaAtaaM taaala�a! CITY OF TI ELI: _iasss RA.I'CHO CIUCATMONGA PLANNII\G DIVISION EXHIETT:_G SCALE: V NORTH OR H Ll ® TENT \T,.,, 51AP TRACT NQ. H853 ■ nc un o. mxcw] ueuwm� "Opus f OncRRn" CITY OF RANCHO ROTU% R.1 IL]S �r C UC. IMO1 G 1 PLAINNIIN�G DIVLSIO.N TI PLE: '� M.RP E,.HIBr► : --D - SCALE: WP5, V NORTH 0 J CJ August 25, 1933 Mr. Dan Coleman Associate Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Tentative Tract No. 11853 N /S19th Street at Ramona Dear Mr. Co'enan: We hereby request that Tentative Tract No. 11853 be extended for a period of eighteen (18) months. Due to the recent downturn in the economy and the housing market, we thought it prudent not to develop the property at that time. However, we are giving this development serious consideration at this time. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. GW /sep Enclosure (Check No. u183_077) Q2it - K\-'� Very truly yours, BARRAATTT IRVINEE ,4.4-A' Gil Wiiksen Director of Land Acquisition CITY OF i \C:: CU0Arw`,OfvGA : C.LIWWVNITY PEW OPMENi DEPT. AUC 1963 AM Phi __718191101u112111213141M A Banatt mvutenrYmx 17752 S'sypark Boulevard, Suite 180, irvina, Ca' iiornia 92714, (7I4) 549 -0155 Contractors License No. 402424 RESOLUTION 130. 81 -128 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RA14CHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11853 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11853, hereinafter "Map" suomitted by American National Housing Corporation, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential development of 72 Condominium dwellings on 5.71 acres of land, located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona Avenue -APN 202 - 171 -42 into 5 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission, for public hearing and action on October 28, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has re subject to a$. conditio-is set forth in the Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission Engineering and Planning Divisions reports evidence presented at the public hearing. oerded approval of the Map Engineering and Planning has read and considered the and has considered other NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 118531 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and speci�ic plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of devel- opment proposed; (d) The desig;, of the subdivision is nn, likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public healt! problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or "use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 2 Resolution No. 81 -128 Page 2 fc) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a. Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: "entative Tract Map No. 11853, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following zonditions and the attached Standard conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The design and material of the patio 19th Street shall be restricted to a a t aL F_ -:shed r A.e f of 5 fee,. i roTi � „e � ,,,,�„�,. g. a.... o. pad. The design of the fences shall to the approval of the Pianning Divi issuance of building permits. fences along maximum height the building be subject lion, prior to 2. The landscape treatment along 19th Street shall be improved to incorporate mounding which steps up to an iow profile natural rock wails, as a means to soften the grade difference between the street and the building pad elevations. Details shall be in- cluded in the final landscape plans. 3. The Eucalyptus trees on the east property line shall be reolaced 15' on center with a species of clean, fast growing trees compatible with residential land use. 4. The continuo:,s interior pedestrian circulation system shall be irpTored with additional texturized cross - walks at key locations and at the main entrance to the project. 5. The meandering sidewalk along 19th Street shall maintain a minimuM distance of 2' from the curb, except at the drive approach. 5. A directory shall be placed at the entrance to the project subject to Planning Division approval. i. Ali ground floor units shall have a contiguous 225 square feet of patio area. S. ine tot lot shall be contained within a defined drea through design features such as landscaping and earth mounds. ENGINEERING DIVISION 9. Revision or reconstruction of intersection drain at Ramona and 19th Street shall be done per Cal Trans standards and policies. Resolution No. 8' 1 28 Page s 10. Vacation of Ramona Avenue north of 19th Street shall be accomplished prior to recordation - 11. Flood protection wall shall be installed along east property line to protect structures from overflow or Alta Loma Channel. 12. A joint use driveway agreement shall be made with adjacent property owner to the west. APPROVE) AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF f . _ go TY OF RANCHO C'JCAMONGA the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Corsnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adcptea by the Planning Commission of the City cf Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of Octobrr, 1981, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Sceranka, Dahl, King None Tolstoy \' J -J✓ � lC° ^C✓L � �J_.°.r Cu VO 9 7. L2 ✓ C ✓ _ L �� V -_ SJV ✓ / V ^e Tn V ° e r -ut n_� _ 4'rC � S CCU � C � � ✓ C C d T � L• i O V V_ C 2� 90 < E VCS � D - a <� -•6 � J <i> CY _ y�V .Vn ✓ M a C V b q q v D r 'J o C Y. ✓ r- C A C y :. C n C 7 r S b� __ ] C D_ L u _C V w O .n C V `� C O D v e c.n � 'J -� q 4 V� l� n �✓ 09fJ ✓L �_ .v -L _ FiO _) < u Y-° _ VVV LY t. _ j- « �Vye O OC ✓ ✓� � O6 ` =C` qC Ee a o v dL q �� n� -c br u✓i G O Y 7 v y °E `a ✓i ax o� _L. i' °° ..✓ °c m wu <� yL. axi I_L (,. a� C C 4VL � Ni V4 «C`06 Y- ^ -�4r VGn E _O ✓`ar •^^ -O --r• OV n VO- m� ^_ co «` O� on e « °nOi � ^_ 6✓ xas ne o r✓ VLb ✓oc e l r _ A E V >xb�o= P « - -1 i t G e L - O y n V✓ r V T 2 L,. �L of « ..� o «� o i`✓ 9. .°` -ice _'c J` C= C ✓ b ✓ C CL C V .c.��i� V V _ < J C yLjpC O OL _ 2 b (c(o 6 rb ` T C O L N I m V> � O P E K � r t �Cj Y 1 d E 11 � ✓ O C✓✓ O L « � �- C u � .G` � C 6 V V ✓ ``y' ��- L ✓ C r O V - «:.• q C V C< ✓ O C E V S V V C a as u ¢ t r b V J « u q V i e T O b Q b p O D -« aL°r °L � m °_ > >:_ o i` o o`.= =Y �b ..- L °.�%: � °� q� c -.� ec e .-.v .. -_ v °uv_ =.`. vp °4`b «° �` Lid MD^ ✓._ p• °bc __° =� _ 6 a N 6 N � W .'"c ` ^ r C q O N C a°- W L S .- Z a �✓ r g d t r V N x✓ - O G� �_" � y`� Z :6 _ C3 CI NI •� � X� � � � � h' � � 'C� 1 i i 1 GI e - u i 6 M L C V V C - OI � - q L q q -� E C q✓ ' q 0 ) q -�✓ « C= 4V 6 2 n °, e 6 E = a. rar✓ J s' Cii I� L ^ CL r. n d n a G1 C S n= a 4 7 � >< ✓ 2< � .. J r L G « E ` =^° o ep C I S o c ee c +�< ✓ � «br Leo e•i �c •� aL.« o v pL` - q O i V O e C O « e V V •i. l' O = i-o.J, .2 e✓ `� e- a b ba. L` eC MO � V CC 6= V « .DO = p. O � eb ✓a C9 T Lr J -°. •«+.L• So v «.. 2O� -4 .: O vr. 1• /�1 �O^ -� =C -v- ✓V i.+ wV Coq Vq �` mob - E mo IC q mb a qn «✓ �_o �.qo. �:_o.c v u > o� -°i.o �e•e✓ o a c✓ r ° jl cu �m oq `« q<+ nq a� py ya ?I ✓L coc —wo as _co m r lIi O IO C ✓ q V 6 G� P✓ .Li ams - N N O C d ✓ O q � O t� i V O° Vol L" O O G e «q� V y p V r Da m ✓� Vl x !! _I jy �✓ c' >o L L�vL. �:> � �L o.00 �o .cn V r.� E eve - n c �q- `v ' n u^ ` L`a� -� ✓ ° 5" "D.L. O •q C y O Y r n 'J P i 00 ^ all � .r ✓ O o- e s L C « y 4 > C q q✓ .• .`. - r✓ c _ sir q D..0 -01?« ✓ Y..l n'Z nn L.c yM« o.°i� d - L �� c v`d_ ui eo q � e w LG= n =q as o c =- feu - -E` ce ¢_. DWI °cm .o o -.• v✓ en .��.> < n= «_° .`, ✓.°. w qe� i �.' b ✓c V J I V V I aL'• V U q q O P O v q L 4 V \I L J � �r � °� 0... � °d rV� a. ✓q ✓ V -br q •_.CL C N- L D H w O L Y - r °> T� O � r•• = ^� OC q, ¢r.r .. tx r 6V C- q 6✓✓ r a 6 V O !Ow G« A L L ✓ .. O • . m V Y 4 V C.� .. N Mf f N b .� (O P 7 � J 7 V I I XI R Y 1 l LL O S m N E L w C Z T S c L •- O C � '7F u C V 7 7 V V V = O q V EO V . P O C = L o' G V U � r D -• c Cv � q V ✓ O q C •� d Y V C T � v d o P� l V u OY G b 0 a S M cq. G 6 O O 6 e a `a q 22 O a c J 6 a V O c U A P Y 6 r O qc P x qc 0 L O O c JO n G r M V V V� 6 n V L v C V o c� q .b.. 9 N {OI M c c be q O 2 vu 4 • n � K u � m i 7 r N r r c o L �o C G q ov [• .Ge od = ` V u A l t ` O c N � o v . C P ` c c C 6 p N c l L C Oi P C qN1 6 9 qcV jqm L V `• V O r OI�V d N b ° �vv G C P C ^ u p ✓ C c O ry q m c°.L. e V r L Dr�J V u PSO O. c c coq s � w O P L O O r C G S U Y _ V G� O n in b N w L CJ O C m ` of c � �q � o b c O 9 O U G O O G L D M 7 d Y b � r uI r a m - `I r _ N� OL .I OI ^I W I V t I O a l yy N J C C E q C _o N 4 C y C N V I G q G G r -� IC r ✓ O _ _J -C± f C• L 3 L O 7 •• r�- V .' � cc N L ^ r L O V VSO a9 E�- u �• V VCV � ✓Yr r^.L C p J'V GL nNL cq_i V °i�.ca i VG�q e� rte �tL-• =u> �_ u c� r.�•c Ge _r. N! x O S m N E L w C Z T S c L •- O C � '7F u C V 7 7 V V V = O q V EO V . P O C = L o' G V U � r D -• c Cv � q V ✓ O q C •� d Y V C T � v d o P� l V u OY G b 0 a S M cq. G 6 O O 6 e a `a q 22 O a c J 6 a V O c U A P Y 6 r O qc P x qc 0 L O O c JO n G r M V V V� 6 n V L v C V o c� q .b.. 9 N {OI M c c be q O 2 vu 4 • n � K u � m i 7 r N r r c o L �o C G q ov [• .Ge od = ` V u A l t ` O c N � o v . C P ` c c C 6 p N c l L C Oi P C qN1 6 9 qcV jqm L V `• V O r OI�V d N b ° �vv G C P C ^ u p ✓ C c O ry q m c°.L. e V r L Dr�J V u PSO O. c c coq s � w O P L O O r C G S U Y _ V G� O n in b N w L CJ O C m ` of c � �q � o b c O 9 O U G O O G L D M 7 d Y b � r uI r a m - `I r _ N� OL .I OI ^I W I 9 ^J O L J• P -J O -J G ✓ C '• 4 G OD CCn1 _V O _ V nG?O _[3r _ ✓'L !„1 L - '+� _ C OrGO ✓9UVC LSO O F G� ✓_ 2� L H O C C L S 2� G O L`� V 9 N 4 V ✓- 'G VVOC2t a�0 OP � �VL>J V..O_l >•� N� r� �✓ q N C _ V O � L C L 9 N q� V V V T V= C G — 9 O _J •� _ O v 9 Y N� U O W far Co'O'�OM LK T Vq >Lr, UO.V� `rte qr VY. �_ � ✓O PTV 05 r,CgO�>.LNN G � l� V N NJ q�✓1 -� Vrt 1E r_ ✓ LO tV' „'4V C 1 Or VIt VVC C'••O CVp G OV � -V ✓L N q W' C _ ^C O< D�'C n O.0 C� L_.Vn GL _V✓ O_ ✓q l4 9 �y� ^C ^V VCj 9y e L yr E u -fir vs r o _ i G> - c� a'e �.`•. uE G�oo� ��- ee �c -= oq ✓ n� uGC c q � N °� uN ro No G C j^ o W`_ S E �J V �' -° O v V O a r v c✓ 4-� .Gi ° vr0 qOC UC�O E--•r0 rpN V- ��_!?✓ -.N.oN Cq- _O O_P N�U�G9 'V Ll C-O' q0 �LVq ✓%P OOr 4 C .nV 7v V 4 3� q a ✓� � O r C V C L" C 7 rc O O C 9 C q T zi E q u✓� 2 r L U q O. 9 9��? 3 L C pr _ u'ca L. uonm coo =•d - =_a.`.scs cc r cl o'- r O N "S 4s 10 l0 N® 11 ri t I O l yy U -� IC r ✓ O _ _J L 3 L O 7 •• -� V O .' � r C"� __° i O �• V C p J'V GL nNL �a S V C i VG�q Ge d 1•� i A G C °. '.n � L O V O N c u r .Oe ¢E �V•j1 c�qc c �', LPL. L !.o .,� cu _u aDLq° u O O•� b �+ O N E _l.- rrt L6 r7 6 N 1'f N •O 9 ^J O L J• P -J O -J G ✓ C '• 4 G OD CCn1 _V O _ V nG?O _[3r _ ✓'L !„1 L - '+� _ C OrGO ✓9UVC LSO O F G� ✓_ 2� L H O C C L S 2� G O L`� V 9 N 4 V ✓- 'G VVOC2t a�0 OP � �VL>J V..O_l >•� N� r� �✓ q N C _ V O � L C L 9 N q� V V V T V= C G — 9 O _J •� _ O v 9 Y N� U O W far Co'O'�OM LK T Vq >Lr, UO.V� `rte qr VY. �_ � ✓O PTV 05 r,CgO�>.LNN G � l� V N NJ q�✓1 -� Vrt 1E r_ ✓ LO tV' „'4V C 1 Or VIt VVC C'••O CVp G OV � -V ✓L N q W' C _ ^C O< D�'C n O.0 C� L_.Vn GL _V✓ O_ ✓q l4 9 �y� ^C ^V VCj 9y e L yr E u -fir vs r o _ i G> - c� a'e �.`•. uE G�oo� ��- ee �c -= oq ✓ n� uGC c q � N °� uN ro No G C j^ o W`_ S E �J V �' -° O v V O a r v c✓ 4-� .Gi ° vr0 qOC UC�O E--•r0 rpN V- ��_!?✓ -.N.oN Cq- _O O_P N�U�G9 'V Ll C-O' q0 �LVq ✓%P OOr 4 C .nV 7v V 4 3� q a ✓� � O r C V C L" C 7 rc O O C 9 C q T zi E q u✓� 2 r L U q O. 9 9��? 3 L C pr _ u'ca L. uonm coo =•d - =_a.`.scs cc r cl o'- r O N "S 4s 10 l0 N® 11 �3 L7 Q n ZOO. C J 7 �..^ BOO � O L r C i 4�✓ O G S 9 Z ' } _ r� � L O O •n L ]n L C }' ✓ N ✓_ C 11 1 u� O✓ T N =✓ = — y i .:. r .+ C P^ � S' P 4 L O L M w L C W O •� [ y O q 0� G L � T j C .:. 2 -a N <r D c ou o 1 � �'`.` ` .`�. °e °i L _ `J'�� L `uP L. _ Lrr• �°ot G I V � G o _ � _ J � L c °qo "`� °� c —� c_._.e r c✓ N i I l I I s?L 44c ..P rL✓ L.'. rqn .. =' '. ^ Jc L _ ✓ p � u r I Cr � I 2 l' > L �� � N i 9 C f .0...n C r✓ O q .'�+ C L r V G n N l V= �^ - q O J P i [. 9 4� 0 � O N n T O k: •--' r d e[ q C l V% { I U 4 I 7 U ci J� LCC N N i O aC Cr N i I L L 4 NLS Lq✓ ✓CC 2 `N .-L� �� yL� =C ^LO UC �V °M J I -Z5 � V G✓ L O` —I U J7 n� = C •°' O� Z l O ✓a T n S i G G G � Z O C 'O � .n T L L V L G r __ W y N g C✓ 7 q = �� O O O L _ C ^J ` a_ n° G r N � V � J n ~• N NI � �^+� q v'[ � �9 r � ' r O N V C q L O 9 L✓r ILIr �. Y= 4 U D Y l ✓[e rJn ` GG tOS Y V ` L� V q O •a C ? Y°- U Tlrr L. L. V y P •+ C � G 4 q Y 4 V .au C� "✓ � q 4 E F C CI r r L C I 6 P d ✓' O �— d C � V� L L Y U �• U r G T N (V � C q 2 4 O `` O L `� ^. �l ��` y M D L' D 66 .eC r O N4N �L uM°•rf 6 00 O N � -y 6�._ E NL r�o O✓ GLO 2 NC dU0 iC W � ✓✓ � C =TV C � Vd � .� ✓ Yy _'• =`. 'Nrn Ley � �LN LO�Ur ,o�e ��NL V �ZV N u Lrr�L v�L'r �N do „o PGj✓ �N Ntb ✓ °P —I _ rl b„ L Lc�4 L cL ° Lor ndo ' r u�✓ c E E zz P. mi : W D v u > I c = { ✓ d NL'G90 co� ✓ouo� a = c9a a✓e �.d.n ✓ nr:: .°.'� qo ..q L x _� _ a fl .° L ✓.. °o °e °vc °v ✓>' •- ' — 1 I > v'qo� LcnL —c no — a.v� a�cmGS - r.. ✓�o� vii Pte_ `b � —d �uv EMCL °•. E °PV a�� _eI � w'e tr. � L � O �'+.✓. F ` _� d ✓N GCV rb� _� C9_r CC P� NO �L �P� G> V NOU � �d ON GVl O✓ -O• G W �v qZ�V OOL•V <N Gw 9 Y O < 9 ¢ L V 9 V CI 00 GNt I I U QN 60w Z - C�1 V V r r~j N✓ Lar •J __ ° O � >. u � � ✓ • i t V D qG. � _V .Ce V q r '� � r O V j � F^J lO � � V O O O d C rr' E' V C Z C GU�'V' �OnC P v Ed � -•O_ N O r � V CVC L Cr C £C ��✓ 'Sr...r20 °N. Vp W yy ��E ✓?L UGV �gJVV ✓V rC_ ZV E� -_G.j d VCLL ✓o ✓ V''J4 � :•.r _ se. L... Gor r vc —N P r -°d... � rs __._✓ P— L_ �:.s `��.�.. c I:v m ✓.. �' o v`� °.c_ 5 d.>e a ui_rN ✓u os c q� q� V U r_ 9 7 �s d e r✓ r � 7 y Y r= L q >� C O JAL C p O•,r •r.G° rUSP b�En r n= f' ` 4f �L Eye CNO^ Ou00 r S 7�Q V•EgN To 0 rGe 09_ V L✓ TC ay it N c O N ✓u 11L0 V Cu dCq d_JV+1r 9 yr VY VO L C✓ V G �_ � L C y g 6 V d Z` ✓ V P r > r Z N Vd.. gw•Lr� QL`rLe v Y Y; _ 4 �2q ✓O ✓✓qN LSE C� ✓CdL -V � OVN LErC V VC Orr TYa �v =�L+r� UCH 9Jr^�`d L qOC EWC G✓ ` =0C V VO iL Z 4 O_ L C N T O V V L d r G✓ q V S V V L°'�^OLV C •O V N l .� 2 �� p� i _ L O _ V N�CO� y Y a LOa G �' 6 _ ✓O L ✓� O ` C N p L}M OP >r dCW =L� P C _ RV� �• � �O C OC t' UNe _ �I1 q r fC rrd �PO � w a4 6� rb ^SC LLV �l Or q'•+OV qr� GM GC L1r \ S O� DO •_nV N�V-• V?r+V LC VL9 �Oq P CL D 9 U irb O ��� <d CNZ✓ E € NOr :Lrr ✓ ✓ ° ✓mss ocL rcbo � nos a o d K� z o o�° o�� ` a o rem' rd^ i > _ E b =a N o Lro oCZ2 o so r O� !c G va , 9 V O °i T g Q 2 G ✓ I C O U C d J q V -°+ V O 6 r r V L •� U> N O� �� O O U_ 4✓ L r _ Y O G✓ C` C C V D V � O� O C d _ � 2 C Tq U Ll L ✓= VO �dV .� OLE = V ^r ��+r �r>�C 4 \<..j mI O= OU: =q ��L C�rN Pro L �� i q V �6 N qr' � 1E0 _•.J qr6 1vZg1 N �✓ E G�� V• it IY q�Z V -�Oq C= G'i _.a C �_JE V 6rTn wt nSN Lrr .r b nC OC NV �yC NV - rn rZL ZL cPab... o r o ou.`..S u a b �r rr: �' yE,' ✓ —Li `= a uN ' ✓ c.�r B✓ �N °" ?_ •', t °��r 22— V �L�6 ✓� a Cu�< <L °�L y� P }yn_ _ - sucrr.r _o _cod _ N=ub ✓I T.G 'n° �✓rr yi °° ° AL ,. __ £• __ rid _ii• -•u r•° V O � Z Fi � � i� V G r r� 0 r_ l r r NN L G. >. U r�rCO L M C r L w. �,r LjVLO 4 f rcL'✓r.f 4 O C (p L= �u r i LVVitV N GV GJO r! N 6V WrV .O.r Q c � ° a _ 0 o c � O V �_ N✓ - y I C' N _ _ i� C 9 I I I � ✓ O ✓ P_ ' r r N O Z _ h i i i _ 4 _ ✓ Tc Cn .ire ' li _> V •_ N M L r Oi � C � I V °- C T ri � u 7� 0ar J I 1 a � '_' G •- � ✓ V ^D v D c m o v ✓ � o o ✓J a°i � o f °' ` �� � 1� 1 v .O. c u J- = o w T .Tr b v 2 V S c ~V 4 -~ M- � � - °. °o. ac c` '.cr..c N I 1 � u° cL vn• ` °= ov u.e ' _ - �.,✓ = � i {111 c° N "' =4 e �✓.. `o� 4 o aN 2 -'c' o i .".d. .°. ..o e ' oN iP = o _ u o o� e -.r ib of x. � a�D 4. sd ✓s IICPC.,G �i _ ✓ o v v •` 3 b e e� I C o - o Y o f - c � _ z �.� u O 6P V Obi PuV ✓C Oi >G =`� ._ O '� N =i•G N � •,� V -P -v' Ci ✓ I.. N V I _2 C _ ✓C __ V bI Ia•.D I •-�✓ aOr Sr„ �L INn ^G V �> >G -_V «. W- 49 6 i LI_ M{ N •-f C V]V V AML Y J C ` _ y r0 r V I Or I d O OC u d u ^O O r ` •°.rte 1 I 1 � 4�a V _� � V G G P _ - D y .°.rN .'n i V.r. O vr0 I I ' ��•� •^Ti V�� ��u O /-_i � � S O L V V u �° Na.� L C � E v D .� !� -I � I I 2a Y aN P '• a O V P � r P.iO. V d C = r P r - y O N - � —I ` V r_ ✓ G r• P q � O? L N -cn L..o tea. cc °o ✓✓ cf I ✓r L u _ ZZ e .r• .^i N °= vd _e o4 va IvWi7 I aou _� °m 2rL�✓.. i ji ii." r = .O Lat c'L.- mm °� Jcr _CO✓ d V L WiEV9 �� e_✓V VJ C _u I .20 r ✓_ Y� N6 a_ N C= L rI lC l °w r V `g L <T -so V W Y V` L u 4 J I I i c V •_• >� O a`c• 0 a rn � l I I � i � c D O a b L� O V i F G C ..e � c 0✓ a C So •a c O V L u O O u L �. _ G r _ � I � I -� D i y g C O i u �_✓ y _ c c^ i s _[ C u .... _ _ O r• 4 O C _ N L a u N- � G 9 .`. r a r c u - L u r x' c S I 1 c aGi b C u r� L b o c ✓ O - �� cCi \ V N r 4 O J 4 a. V �. .: � 2 S A .O.r 2_ j S L° C✓ L J C S` -J NL O o u Xi e✓ ,{° I i N Ea n`t. acs i" -< � sG cC VY ='r"✓ LT V I 1 I 1 � - uV G � L1 Cr NN qZ�ez t v o P ✓v Pra �xN CV° Vvd iI r C✓ r� r-J ( q Gy Gv0' VC iW L _ V O_ 4 I D _ C N_ I- V I I I 1 ✓ ¢. ."r ^J ✓ ` a_ C w u 2 t G V NL_p� 00- GV 6. V4✓ E XI 1 i• I I 1 Q,. I I 1 J Jf b� I> P 1 I 1 A- I va u >' 1� V °�� r +�I°- UO^ r O CY Vyr� •Ln .J O � C � N� G �� V C. v •ei Y' a •• y Cr V V P� 6 L 7 oC'4 L a LNV Y .NN w C D •"J E °� Z Cr V'dC ��>. QI 1 N°VY Y6dY Y LL O 9 P y O - yCFC q0 1 1 v p r w e E 6Y JOY •Jr � NG Gq ' d�L. w ^_O �.0 'J .>q LC_L _C _y y0 O Z­,;: C Pd u pi C�� C O Oy �� DJ CGUy -Z 2 C L v.� ac � y�0 er >�� •+ GC VO >.y V`a z V c V°. nr ... ... _ .. cpY d -Z _v a_cp o: 10 L� •n N rl h I° ].�1 11 C AYES: COMiUSSIONERS: NOES: Coxa- aSSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RE4PEL, SCERANZP., DAHL, KING NONE TOLST_OY Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Rempel, carried, to approve the Minutes of September 23, 1981. AYES: CO'RaSSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, RaEpEL, SCERANKA, 1 -ING NONE TOLSTOY CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: Moved by Rempet, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to adopt the Consent Calendar on the following items: A. TIME EF.TE! Tentative Tentative Tentative Tentative Tentative Tentative !SION I Tract Tract Tract Tract Tract Tract ROUES. 9659 - 11459 11563 11013 9619 11564 'S FOR THE FOLL014INC TRACTS: Carnelias Investments - Prime Builders - Red Hill Partners - Brubaker - Hillside Vista - Landmark B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSYL. -' L'-'R DE MOPMENT REVIEW N0. 81 -32 - B.W.L.C. The development of a 31,940 square foot industrial building on 2.14 acres of land in the General Industrial category, located on the east side of Etiwanda, seuth of Arrow. APN 229- 141 -13. C. DESIGN REVTEW FOR TENTATIVE T'I.ACT NO. 11549 •- LEWIS - A total resi- dential development for design review appr;valof 1 single family dwelling units on 17 acres of laud in the R -1 zone, located on the east side of Etiwa-ida Avenue between Summit Avenue and highland Avenue. APN 225- 181 -56. PUBLIC HEARINGS D. ENVIROY.MTENTAL ASSESSMEIT AIM PLANNED DcE'V Urnnr :r r+u. of -ui Sri iio_ A- ILRICAN NATIONAL HOUSING CURPORATION - A total planned development of 72 condominium units on 5.71 acres of land in the R -1 -8,500 zone located on the north side of 13th Street and Ramona Avenue. APN 209 - 171 -42. Curt Johnston. Assistant Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Planning Commission Minutes -2- October 28, 1981 C C Chairman King opened the public hearing. Dennis Chiniaeff, representing American Sational Housing Corporation, addressed the Commission stating that he had some conditions which he wished clarification on. One cor.iition was the requirement of a natural rock wall along 19th. It was the applicant's opinion that the use of undulating mounding would serve the same purpose. He stated that his secend concern was the requirement that t;ae project be placed _n a Landscape Maintenance District. He stated that since this project would have a Homeowners' Association and this would maintain the area of 19th in question, it was rot necessary to also be placed in a Landscape Maintenance District. Chairman icing asked if there were any others in the audience who wished to address the Commission. :'here be'_ng none, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Dahl stated that when the Brethren in Christ Church Site Plan was approved the access on the east cmd of the property was to be a shared access wwith this project. He further stated that this access appeared to be an emergency access only and asked if the access was intende._ to be widened. ;-'r. Johnson replied that the emergency access on 19th would be turf - blocked only. Commissioner Ddhl asked Staff to clarify the requirement of the natural block wall being questioned by the applicant. Mr. Vairin stated that the Design Review Committee had thought that the transition from the street grade up to the pad grade was severe and desired some type of landscaping technique to reduce the grade. He further stated that if the developer objected to the block wall, other landscape methods could be substituted. He suggested that a change in wording in the Resolution could be made to state that to create a smoother transition from the street grade to the dwelling unit grade with special landscape features. Commissioner Dahl asked if the proposed area for the tot lot would be a furnished tot lot. Mr. Chiniaeff replied that it would be a £•—nished play area. Commissioner Dail asked if the area was to be fenced. Mr. Chiniaeff replied that it was not proposed to be fenced. Mr. Vairin stated that the pool and recreation areas of this project were separate areas. Planning Commission Minutes -3- = C,_tober 28, 1981 Commissioner Sceranka stated that it was his opinion that tle tot lot and play areas should be either surrounded by a low wall, low landscaping, or some means to separate them frou other areas of the project. It was his opinion that this should become a condition of approval. Mr. Chiniaeff replied t`tat he had no objection to rsin_g landscaping to separate the area ; however felt that the use of fencing would destroy the open space areas of the project. Commissioner Rempel :rated that the Condition in the Resolution requiring the removal of Eucalyptus trees and the replacement of them with Eucalyptus of another species be reworded that they be replaced with a fast growing, clean tree, as another type as Eucalyptus could be a very messy tree. Commissioner Rempel further stated that the reason for the landscape Maintenance District requicement was that the city cot.ld not control what might happen to the pr -ject and its Homeownert,' Asscaiation in the future. By requiring the prn'•.:t '1 be a part of the Landscape Maintenance District, we could be sure that the property would always be properly maintained. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to adopt the Resolution conditionally approving Tentative Tract •_1853 with the changes as recommended. E_ E JIRONZEN1'AL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PER'"IT N0. 81 -'.5 - BECK The development of a self -serve car wash and gas station ir. the Industrial Park category on 1 acre of land located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Jersey Boulevard. APN 209- 142 -32. Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Chairman King asked the Commissioners if there were any questions. There were none and Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. Larry Beck addressed the Commission stating that he accepted the conditions of appr,;•al and that he would answer any questions the Commission had. There were no further public comments and the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to adopt the Resolution. approving Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -15. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMpEL, SCERANKA, DAM. KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY Planning Commission Minutes -4- 0 =tob ^r 28, 1981 RESOLUTION N0. a 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO C1JCA1iONGA "LANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE EX ENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11853 LOCATED ON THE NOPTH SIOC OF 19TH STREET AT RAMJNA AVENUE WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for tcie above - described project, ;:s^suant to Section 1.401.11.2 of Ordinance 28 -5, the Subdivision Ordinance; end rtNLM1EAS, the Planning COmissiOn conditir.nally approved the above - described Tentative Tract Neap. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Plannicj Commission has made the following findings: A. distressed market ecl mate for nresidentialv a projects. B. conditions make t ou-nreasonable Ito �reca d the eTract at this time. C. That strict enfnre:amert of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of tre Zoning Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfz-e, or materially injurious to proper A es or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: time extension for: TRACT 11853 The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Cormission hereby grants a APPLICANT Barratt Irvine .EXPIRATION October 28, 1984 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. pLXiNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. tout, airman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission Resolution No. Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the C*,ty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission ';f the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comemisson held or ti.. 14th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COKMISSIONERS: 13 0 El E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1983 TO: Chairman and Members of the P'anning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner - MCDANIEL - A SUBJECT: TIMt t�1tn�ivn -UR �•, ^ °••� — - -- total residential development of 9-11: acres into 3 lots in the R -1 zone located on the northeast corner of Ramona and Church - APN 208- 181 -06. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a time extension for Tentative TraiO -IF6, as described aba% ^. The current expiration date is September 25, 1983 and the applicant is requesting an extension due to ec the current onomic conditions. ANALYSIS: Tentative tracts in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are valid for a maximum of four (4) years, with apropriate extensions per the Subdivision Map Act. This tract was originally approved months on March 25, 1981, and subsequently granted an 18 -month extension. Since eighteen months remain of the four year maximum, it is suggested that a final extension be granted for the full eighteen months. A copy of the Resolution of Approval with Condi ± -ons and Planning Commission Minutes of the March 25, 1981 meeting art attached for your review. A review of the project indicated that the site plan is consistent with current development standards. In addition, the architectural elevations as shown on the attachments appear to meet the current design standards. RECOMMENDATION: It is months be granted be March 25, 1985. itted, Rick �:rn Yity`Pla 'RG:CJ:jr recommended that a final extension of eighteen for Traci 10316. The new expiration date would -M C i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Time Extension - TT 10315 /McDaniel September 14, 1983 Page 2 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "Cu - Concentuai Grad;ng Exhibits "F -I" - Building Elevations Time Extension Request from Applicant Resolution of Approval with Conditions Planning Commission Minutes - March 25, 1981 Time Extension Resolution of Approval E V] .ta . �°r C \�11N■■■■ ■ENV/ �_r4yM � —� !. Iml� . u■m °�� I�IIRn■1! ■niitin■n■ ■ / ' inn■ ��ti /f111 I.nnnn■ni■ •year. `K�: ■ ■ ■■ � ■ ■U ■■ ■ I• NORM CITY o O , RANCHO • f PLANNING • Q CL :19 i 4s ri'G• -.- . -`♦ > ��_ "1S.l =AIL a ? / 1�2� af' .� a� '- � � e ;.z Sg. � I. + } i.j ° %. � �� --'�_ .'mot c• 't ?., �- p� w t F �i 3 i s� f, � ----.J 1� +�r�'h I -ICI •i�' -' 1: i I s f 7%II.— l a � 1 ' L., 'I ji j3 1, u y llu� t Lrf Iv F: !. =i I J c }I I It I a• i a .I I 'I I Z 1. :• ... i - / el `v. I N •' 1fl'. �. S �_. i I j llu� t Lrf Iv F: !. =i I J c }I I It I a• i a .I I 'I I Z 1. :• ... i - / el `v. I N s Z i s R A 14 F Ilk AL a ! ! 1 I I � + —� a • � " FY 3 ' _ 'y J r' J �4 to 0 a 9 I IM, W. b e i X f\ 1. xII lit 1 li x X. / jai/ t= •3 1 �; bq i ''•: � 6 '•i11. �i � P ��� � 1 1 N wt� V t t S Li Yx { z> r, a u a. Lij oo- I ti M2 i I� 7 r ♦ F4 ` 'y O I } ti b aaNi 3a \;z:: Ll `J L H c r, v - ti DELL M, McDANIMLs e?v: • vw / /iw O� :dJL�6G)Z!I[l�'1t 1013 N. BEGONIA AVENUE • ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91762 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 9340 Baseline Rd., P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 Gentlemen: DELL M. MCDANIEL °(+BERT N. GRIFFiTTS GARY D. Mei,� NIPL • 17141984 -2414 Pe: Project File STT 10316, N.E.C. Ramona 6 Church Our project, listed above, will expire on September 2S, 1983- Due to the continued unsettled economic conditions, we strongly feel it such too risky to build out this project in the near future. We ask you grant us a one years extension of the Tentative Tract Asap. Yours cooperation is appreciated. Yours very truly, DELL M. McDANIEL, INC. Gary McDaniel Vice President GDMc /acb El 11 4. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -31 wo A RESOL'uiION OF THE PLA "ltii ".G COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10316. 0 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10316, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Dell McDaniel, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 9.76 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Church Street_ and Ramona Avenue into 33 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on March 11, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City PTanner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10316 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all.appiicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, ow within record, for access through or use of the property the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. 81 -91 Page 2 C (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract leap No. 10316, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: 1. Installation of storm drain on Ramona Avenue from north tract boundary to Church Street storm drain shall be required. 2. All existing easements lying within the future right -of- way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. 3. All perimeter landscaped parkways are required to be annexed into the landscape maintenance district. 4. Landscaping and -irrigation systems required to be installed on public right -of -way on the perimeter of this tract area shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City and annexed into the landscape maintenance district. 5. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any existing utility facility that would affect construction. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 7. Additional wood trim and architectural treatment shall be provided on side street yard elevations. S. The driveway and garage on lot 9 shall be relocated to face the north property line on Yew Street. 9. That detailed elevations and landscaping plans shall he submitted for fencing and planting to occur on the east side of lot 8. Said landscaping shall become part of a maintenance district. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8Y :� _ _ �c —�( r �<" rman 11 U 11 U R- asolution No. 81 -31 Page 3 r ATTEST: l 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passel, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of March, 1981 by the follwoing vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 Sceranka, King, Rempel, Tolstoy, Dahl None None DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject: IT�V� ��' '��✓1 Applicant Location: Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE IJITi THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development I. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. • 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of -- approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. ® 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zonina Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time or Building Permit issuance. 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation. Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. dooe 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the. Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 400�9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required 5y the Planning and Building Divisions. 10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 11 y _ 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Pla;inina Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method Of shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of ; ^itiai development shall I e solar heated. 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circul� r. -isles shall be provided throughout the development to connec :.-flings with open spaces and recreational uses. 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. 15. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 18. Security devices suchas window locks shall be installed on each unit. 14. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. Z20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consu::ption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. _ 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. 2. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. _ 24. This tract shall form cr annex io a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. C 25. This project shall provide percent of affordab'.e housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housinc+ policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the proje ^t. Proof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. B. --Parking and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimensio:: of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. _ 2. Parking lot trees shall be a.minimum 15 gallon size. _ 3. All two -way aisle Widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. _Z4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a mipimum of 24 feet wide at ail times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District, requirements. _ 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. _ 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 8. The C.C. & F.'s shall restrict the storzge of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. .> 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior 6 rulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed by the appiicant and submitted to the City Piann-�ng Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2.- Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved b: the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. LJ f Z-. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved far removal —way be required to be replace{ on a tree- for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. Z4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon, size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonaa and shah plantea at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the davelop:nent; 200"'-2,1" box or larger, 70 " -15 gallon„ and 100.-5 gallon. `/6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving cr,ndition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. Z7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and arc 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irr' gated in accordance with _,lope planting requirements of the .,ty of Ranci,o Cucamonga. Such slope planting shati include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer untii each individual unit is sold ana occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after gemination. Z8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The fiz,ul design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 11. A minimum of _ specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleiviai rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along D. signs 1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Ccmprehensive Sign Ordinance and Shall require revie:: and apprCVc,l by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. _ 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. _ 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Aoprovais Required _ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. _ 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative-Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance/Conditional Use Permit _ 4. This Cond.tienai Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at which time the Planning Cc-.mission may add or delete cand tons or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. b. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract - , on , I have read the C.C. & R 's and unuerstand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purc.iaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. —/6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance cf building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior tc the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of ail other residential projects. 7 y r Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance r of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the AML Dzpar4 znt of Co:,.�iar.ity Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) Bays prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. 8. This approvai shall become gull and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when. no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WI N THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Ccde, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval or this project- Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection, is available. _le3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees ma, include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. _ 4_ Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 5_ This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within cne year from the date of project approval. 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. _ 7. Dwelling units shall be consL-ructed with fire retardant mater' and non - combustible roof material. 41 _ 8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures _ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building considering use, area and fire - resistiveness _ 2. E"15tl ng building(s) shall be made to comply Zoning regulations for the intended use or t _ 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be to comply with appropriate grading practices Code for property line clearances of existing buildings. with current Building and re building shall be demolished. removed, filled and /or capped and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substan-,ial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. ® _ 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. _ 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. �4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. J APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLL944ING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access -Z 1. Cedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: n _ 4i� additional feet on &IM984 Awe_ additional feet on I additional feet on i Z3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. 10 4. All right of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as follows: / 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any tricks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. J. Street Improvements _/1 - Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A-C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lichts on all interior streets. 4#* 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NPJ-IE CURB & GUTTER A C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WF(EEL CHAIR RAi4PS OTTER r' ♦ dO* r 0.00 1 � � f 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City EnginEer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for ail street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City 9 ., Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing p completion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Jr 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. K. Drainage and Flood Control _ 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required tQ; the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: 3. The proposed project fails within areas indicated as subject to flooding ` — under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4, A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the� s^t-r-uc_t_u-r-es b diverting sheet runoff to street. '� Z.�a- €al_lro-nng nor +h - outh streets shall be desiened asAnajor water carrying street) requiring a combination of special curb Neigh V, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or • landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. L. Utilities �1. All proposed utilities within the project shall he installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV_ ® 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. .000" 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installaticn of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards- Water Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the "Environmental health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved_ Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. M. General Reouire-ents and Aoorovais i. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: B. County Dust Abater..en *_ (required prior to issuance of a -trading permit) �C_ San Bernardino County Flood Control District - D_ Other: 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded A th this map and a copy provided to the City. _ 9 /3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shali be filed with the City i�,unc ". The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. i 11 l CONSENT CALENDAR A. ENArRONWENT_PT ASSESSMENT_ FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW h0. 81 -10 - SCI- McSSER - The development of a 21,600 sq. ft. industrial warehouse addition to the existing Schlosser Forge on 3 acres of land in the M -2 zone located at 11711 Arrow Route - APN 229 - 111 -18. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt the Consent Calendar. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, SCERANFA, KING, TOLSTOY, DAHL COMMISSIONERS: NONE w:21-TSSIONERS: NONE - carried- PUBLI" HEARINGS ��I t_B 1N,'RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NT -1E}361`i- MC DANIEL - A total residential development of 9.76 acres iBro 33 lots in the R -1 zone generally located on the northeast corner of Ramona and Church - APN 208 - 181 -06. >ar:y Hogan, City Planner, reviewed the staff report. ,hairman Dahl stated that he had noticed that the D?si.gn Review Committee tad reviewed this and that there was a statement concerning the driveway and garage on lot 9. Mr. Hogan replied that this was correct. He indicated that it was safer to have access come off of the east -west street and that the entry for ingress and egress be off of the interior. Commissioner icing asked on which borders of this property Eucalyptus trees can be found. Mr. Hogan replied that there were some on the east and north property line. Commissioner King asked if the developer will take them down. Mr. Hogan replied that Condition No. 3 talks about retaining these trees where possible and trimming and topping them. Further, that if they were not in the way of the building, they were to be preserved. Commissioner Tolstoy asked where trees are to be removed and replaced are the replacement tree types to be of the wind break variety? Mr. iiopan replied that they were. is Planning Commission Minutes -2- March 25, 1981 R Commissioner Tolstoy stated that it should be made clear that it is the windbreak function that is doubly importart. Mr. Rogan replied that is the direction given by the Planning Commission and staff will continue to do this. Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing. Mr. Gary McDaniel, 3028 Calle Juarez, San Clemente, the applica -t, asked about Item 1 Section 2 of the Resolution regarding the storm drain on Ramona, the north tract boundary Church Street being required, and whether this would be reimbursed. Mr. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, replied explaining the requirement and that reimbursement would be set by the City Council. Assistant City Attorney, Hopson, explained the credit of fees on storm drain reimbursements. Mr. McDaniel also questioned Condition No. 20 requiring double -paned windows. Mr. Rogan replied that it was not a requirement; however, some of the items listed within the condition would have to be furnished. Mr. McDaniel stated that he would put in the shower heads. Commissioner Sceranka asked for a list of what the developer said he would put in to see what had been agreed to. Mr. Vairin stated that the applicant filled out a check list and it was in file if the Commission wished to review it. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Y ;v Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Ring, carried unanimously, to i` adopt Resolution No. 81 -31 with the attached conditions. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11608 - L & G LIMITED - A total residential development of 8.31 acres into 2 lots comprising 120 condominium units in the southeast corner of Archibald and Victoria - APN 202 - 181 -07. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Tolstoy asked what the visitor parking requirement is. Mr. Vairin replied that it is one space for every five (5) dwelling units. Planning Commission Minutes -3- March 25, 1981 X11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10316 LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RAMONA AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 1.401.11.2 of Ordinance 28 -8, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described Tentative Tract Map. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following l5n ngs: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to record the Tract at this time. C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or imn^c: °menu in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extensioor: TRACT APPLICANT EXPIRATION 10316 McDaniel March 25, 1985 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission Resolution No. Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 -•J E L:�J 11 11 1: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1983 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. 4ubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 'PARCEL MAP 6962 REQUESTED BY located on the north side of ` licara Drive at Jasper S 1061 - 141 -06 i„ Parcel Map 6962 was approved by Planning Commission on August 26, 1981 for the division of 2.07 acres of land into 4 parcels in the R- 1- 20,000 zone located on the northside of Vicara Drive, west of Jasper Street. This tentative approval is valid for two years and with appropriate extensions, an additional two years time can be granted. Larry Key, owner, has requested an extension of time due to financial circumstances. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a one -year extension of time be granted Parcel Map 6962. The new expiration date will be August 26, 1984. Respectfully subnaitted, LBH:BI /aa Attachments: Map Letter Ccnditions Resolution ITEM D rCJE i -V AUG t 6 -9063 August 8, 1983 �i,r OF FANCHO CUCRAIGNGA Er!S;NEER!NG Dw;Si02! City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Paul Rougeau Re: P.M. 6962 Dear Mr. Rougeau: I have received your letter of June 24, 1983 stating that my Parcel Map will expire on August 26, 1983. I am unable to proceed with the rec.- rdation of my Parcel Map at this time due to financial circumstances, therefore I would like to request an extension of time. I am enclosing the extension fee of $62.00 with this request. If you have any questions. please contact me. Thank you for your consideration. LK /mlh Sincerely, Larry ey 12601 Aiepeno Chino, CA 91710 714/627 -4479 0 triky2-MLEMNU DIVISION VICINITY MAP cy -1,, J I L Lt Ll I I.- ► � Cm(a• RaYL]ip CLGaVOYG9L , NiM-Y OF SJaI er3h.maYO T E NTATIVE M AP PARCEL MAP NS 6 tY�+.L.wx�e\vr)nc_ srecta >vsL..w+\La�GZ. ►� CYG\AOCO \G fy/619 �.GGCa G\ YD Gi Ow ALfJL v.r�, .Q.Cam10I .. �lC.YGeO\Y000U[e.6aZfF�yp01\G. .warG�e ov) MGY, 1991 � � enLwov. cw•t 'Ma..\wt N)L.acwe ✓aue\. YeL� ✓A i'YI.Oar a\lM T+O[L•L •. .b. ataR: 4 xC/N � R.MG� n..Y: .M MOtA V t4YT•�r ylG rrat: CGVD. L Yfr.T Ca.A��.a: _ 4G•w.0 _ o� ewrr�u ���.o w.• YM^ :iYi_ M�•u. s.r.r rr r.DCr 1. oD Y wr•.: 6 Y r.Y. WGhrf -K ww.ae .ea: ut)acr nw \scD. .\.Le.cue svc. CY \MO. <.LVC 1r ahY <l Yl GZi -Mla w+. wti 4 w AO••�•.le 4�4 �Y,�w�\. pp�Ay iN, QL TJL ilea, 3373. bL S. 3!197 27 .9-.0 j 23 24 } 2S 2t. 27 7a bL N:d'. 3332 '• >�� 72 �1�� �Y 7 72 73�!;'� ! j JS 7s 7 R. tic. %1298 -'? � &L A. 733.•33 -34 G.ac L1: CJ U E. 0 t C RESOLUTION NO. 81 -95 C A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6962 (TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP 140. 6962) LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF VICARA AT JASPER STREET. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6962, submitted by Larry Key and consisting of 4 parcels, located NIS Vicara at Jasper Street, being a division of parcel 3 of Parcel Map 3342 recorded in Book 33, Pages 61 and 62; and, WHEREAS, on June 24, 1981, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on August 26, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: El SECTION 2: adverse environmental August 26, 1981. That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. That this project will not create significant impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 6962 is approved subject tc the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPP,OV0 AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PANCHG CUCAMONGA P Resolution tic. 811-. Page 2 T I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the ?canning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced. passed, and adopted by the Planning Cormission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of August, 1981, by the `ollowing vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS Dahl, Tolstoy, Rempel, Sceranka, King None None E 1 1 C l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 CITY crygTyEER'S-REPORT FILED BY: Larry Key TENTATIVE NEAP N0. 6962 LOCATION: North side of Vicara at Jasper Street DATE FILED: 6/24/81 NUMBER OF LOTS: 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 3 of Parcel Mar, 3342 RECEIPT NUMBER: 11839 recorded in Book 33 pages 61 and 62 FEE: S250.OG ZONE: R- 1,20.0^0 TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Jerry Wilson, GROSS ACREAGE: 2.08 ADDRESS: 387 N. 2nd Street MINIMUM LOT AREA: Upland, CA 91786 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * : * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE Larry Key 12601 Jalepeno Avenue 7141627 -4479 Chino. CA 91710 REPORT OF THE CIT', 'cNGINEER Dedications 1. Dedicatlien by final map of all intericr street rights -of -way and a71 necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: 30 additional feet on Vicara various widths on Jasper additional feet on _ Corner P/L radius required on — - Other 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows: 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: o_ The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 c c TENTATIVE MAP N0. Page 2 Improvements (Bonding is required prior to KI Recording for Vicara ) $IBuilding permit for Jasper ) 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, one drive apprcach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets. 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: *includinq landscaping and irrigation on meter STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER. A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET TREES STREET LIGHTS MEDIAN ISLAND* OTHER Vicara X X X Jasper X i w 9_ Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative Tap, or as required by the City Engineer. X 10_ Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities are to be underground. X 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary_ X 12. install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. X 13. Developer is tr, provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Stich plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. x 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucanonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underground service. _ 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an H.C. overlay: 17. T„e following specific dimensions, i_e., cu -de -sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: _ 18. The following existing streets are substandard: They will require: Approvals and Fees _ 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of San Bernardino County Flood Control District. x 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities ties involved. Approval of the final map will be that may be received from them_ RCE 20 approval from CALTRANS/ and other interested agen- subject to any requirements TENTATIVE MAP 110. 6962 Page 3 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A_ Caltrans, for: B. City: C. County Dust F.batement District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Pemit if any trenches are over 5' deep: E. Cucamonga County 'dater District: F_ Other: Map Control 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- - via_ for two -way traffic and parking or. all affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way line in accord- -- ante with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located _ 26. The Boundary of the Tentative Map needs cTarification as follows: 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. Parcel Map Waiver 28. Information submitted at the time of application is /_ _ is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map CertiriEate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Controi (Bonding is required prior to 0 Recording nor O Building permit for ) 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that prrgr.- and Ordinance No. 24. 30. A drainage charnel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty 'line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. 31. it water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following location--:_ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies wii be reauire to assess 1mPdt o -ni— creased runoff. X 34. The site shall be rough graded per conceptual grading plan prior to recordation of map. RCE 20 MisceI "an eoas Dust abatement will be made a condition this project. Eloise impact on this project will be mi Division report on subject property. This pr =perty =:s not within the present annexation. All information required to be shown on quired: tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available 3t the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Plater District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not bZ issued unless said certification is received in writing. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the sign ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the findw map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. At the time of Final Map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control , in accordance with City equestrian trail standards, shal i be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final maD. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, THE LOCATEDNON THE NORTHJSIDE OF VICARA DRIVE, WEST OF JASPER STREET WHEREAS, a request has bean filed for a time extension for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2(b) of Ordinance 28 -3, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described Tentative Parcel Map. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following inaings: A. That economic conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time; B. That external physical conditions have caused delay in the start of construction; C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance; D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension f—Or-' TRACT DEVELOPER EXPI RATION 6962 Larry Key August 26, 1984 APPROVED AND ADOPTED 1415 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. FLANKING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission Resolution No. Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: El 11 C E - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1983 Tp; Planning Cortenission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF TPy'.E FOR PARCEL MAP 6976 located on the south side of Arrow APN 209 - 141 -68 BY B.0 en Avenue - Parce` Map 6976 was approved by Planning Commission on September 9, 1981 for the division of 49.93 acres of land into 22 parcels within Subarea 9 of the Industrial Specific Plan located on the south side of Arrow Route, east of Haven Avenue. Revisions reducing the number of lots to 14 were approved by Planning Commission on May 11, 1983. This tentative approval is valid for two years and with appropriate extensions, an additional two years time can be granted. Due to the death of one of the partners of B.C.G. Properties, the engineerng firm of George MimMack has requested a one -year extension, at this time, on behalf of their client. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a one -year extension of time be gr5_t_e_d_VarceT Map 6976. The new expiration date will be Septemer 9, 1984. Attachments: Map Letter Conditions Resolution ITEM E HIGHWAY DESIGN TRAFFIC August 19, 1983 ENGINEERING Ge® e H. Mim Consulting Civil Engineer 0 LEND DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho CUCAm- n a 9 Frgineering Department ASSESSMENT Attn._ Mar. Paul Rougeau DISTRICTS 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C P.anchO Cucamonga, California 91730 UTILITIES Re. Time Extension for Parcel Map 6976 STORM DRAINS Dear Mr. Rougeau, ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES We are hereby requesting a one year t--'.n e extension for Parcel Map 6976 on behalf of our clie:,_.,, B. C. G. Properties. The MUNICIPAL CONSULTING reason for the request is that cne of the nrinci pals, M.r. B. D. Galleano, passed away recently and this has caused some compli- cations. ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS If you have any questions or require additional information on this matter, please contact our office- Yours very truly, George H_ M..,^ Mack eI.I 216 SOUTH EUCLID AVENUE. ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91761 + (713) 983.0439 3; 11 E 11 �J e 0 w N w w nn 2' 1_ E M w U a Ll Y a 'I t A WS JY J w C^ � a a � Y a 'I 1, Y I; --r - -7 I s J J C^ � a a I a m J 1, Y I; --r - -7 TY OF RANCHO CUCAN,IONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY NIAP n N tit N0. 697 page c RESOLUTION NO. 83 -62 A RESOLUTION OF'THE PLANN,NG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING REVISED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 6976 WHEttEHS, Tentative Parcel Map 6976, hereinafter the ea submitted Property Richard Capeilino, applicant, for the purpose s, situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, described as an industrial subdivision of 49.93 acres being divided into 22 parcels within subarea 9, located on the south side of Arrow Route, east of Haven Avenue, was conditionally approved by the Planning rn=- fission on September 9, 1982; and WHEREAS, a revision to said map creating 14 parcels and a realignment cf the circulation pattern has regularly come before the Planning Commission on May 11, 1983; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering Division Report. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga resolv3s as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: ® A. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. B. Tnat the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. C. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. D. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: Revised Tentative Parcel Map 6976 a copy of which is attached ereto, is hereby approved subject to all the following cenditions: A. Condition of Approval contained in Resolution No. 81 -103 shall apply to this map. B. Vehicular access rights on Arrow Route shall be dedicated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. L t Resolution 83 -62 /- Page 2 f_ C C. Open space area on Parcel 1 shall be fully landscaped including sprinkler systems, or attached to property adjacent to the west prior to issuance of Building Permits for said parcel 1. Other uses of the area will be explored, subject to Community Development Director approval. The City shall have the right to maintain landscaping and ciiarge property owner if it becomes necessary. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY, 1983. PLANNING q(.rt.`MISSION 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY �A - Berman Rempe h-irmay ATTEST- t. Secretary of the Planning ,.omission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of May, 1933, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: C"!SSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, MCNIEL_ STOUT, REMPEL NONE JUA.? EZ E RESOLUTION NO. 81 -103 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLA?t' tING CO1a'iISS10i1 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C'JCAIMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6976 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6976) LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6976, submitted by Richard J. Capellino and consisting of 22 parcels, located on the south side of Arrow P.oute, Cant of Haven Avenue, being a division of the south 1/2 of section 12, T. :_ S., R. % N•, San Bernardirlu Meridian was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and, WHEREAS, on Juiy 2, 1981, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described tentative map; and 1,HERE.kS, on September 9, 1981, the Planning Co^v.i`s' ^n he'd z duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAIrDNGA PLANNING CO`"�`9ISSIC . R SOLVED AS FOLLO',iS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2, That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the pro posed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. q. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not ublic healthnproblems7 damage, public have adverse affects or abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on September 9, 1981. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map too. 6576 is approved subject_ to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF SEPTEt"BEP., 1981. PLANNING CO'.misSIOte OF THE CITY CF P.A.NCHO CUCAFIONGA Resolution No. 81f '3 Page 2 i I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of September, 1981, by the fcllcwing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Dahl, Rempel, Tolstoy, King NOES: COMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None �J 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER °S REPORT FILED BY: Richard Capellino TENTATIVE NAP NO. PM 6976 LOCATION: South side of Arrow Route, east of Haven DATE FILED: 7/2/81 Avenue NUMBER OF LOTS: 22 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: subdivision of the south 1/2 of RECEIPT NUMBER: 11958 sectior. 12 T1S, R71J. Sai, Bernardino •eridian FEE: $250.00 ZONE: M -2 TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: George MimMacr GROSS ACREAGE: 49.93 — ADDRESS: 214 S. Euclid Ave. MINIMUM LOT AREA: Ontario, CA 91761 MIN114UII LOT FRONTAGE: RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE r Richard J. Caaellina 1880 Del Amo Blvd. 13/320 -1234 Torrance2 CA 91601 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications X 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on — additional feet o>> _ Corner ?/L radius required on _ Other _x 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be dcdic ed along all lots to Arrrnv6* Rte except two 50' openings centered on the property 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision recuired for: 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: *and shall be delineated on the map. RCE 20 1� TEN P.TIVE MAP 140. 69ib l Page 2 Improvements (Bonding is required prior tot Recording for�ll o rc is } 0 Building permit for 1 _X 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement. sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets. (Sidewalk shall be on one side of the interior streets within _ 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: separate *including landscaping and irrigation on meter easement) STREET NAME CURB & CZTTER A.C. PVN,T. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET JSTREET TREES j LIGHTS MEDIAN ISLSND* OTHER Arrow Rte. X X X X X * ! 1 i * Lien Agreement X 4. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. x 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable teievision.conduit. All utilities _ are to be underground. X 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. X 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X_ 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern, California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucanonga shall be decorative poles with underqround service. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: x 17. The .o, owing speci is dimensions, i.e., cul-de-sac radius, street sectien widths) are not approved: pavement width for all interior streets shall be 44 f t wid within 54 fee .' 18. The .o o:aing existing streets are substanda They will require: Approvals and Fee, _ 19. This subdivision shall be subject to condi� ions of San. Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 20. Approvals have not bee-, .cured from all utilities cies involved. Apprc ' the final map will be that may be received =hem. RCE 20 approval from CALTRAIIS/ and other interested agen- subject to any 'equirements � c TENTATI`JE MAP NO. 6976 Page 3 ® x 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans, for: B. City: X_ C. County Dust Abatement District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep:. X _ V. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other: �-- Mao Control 22. if only a portion or this P4ap is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- - vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or arez and should be corrected on the final map: V 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way lire in 2Lcord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 25. The boundary of the Tentative Map needs c arification as follows: tee ow�ea A.T. 8S .F Raiiwav at easterl boundary O.R. 542 243 shall be 27. he border sha71 be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. *excluded from map. Parcel Map Waiver 28. Information submitted at the time of application is /_ is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map7 Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to 12 Recording for j 0 Building permit for X 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- - ing under the Rational Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance ho. 24. Zone A -0 30. A drainage charnel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. 31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidev:alk at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:_ X 33. broad scale hydrologic studies wl!l oe requrreo r.0 d »=» - -- runoff. X 34. A drainage retention basin per City standard shall be constructed the down- stream end of the project to retain increase in runoff due to ultimate develop- ment, prior to recordation of the map. The basin shall remain in place until such time as the master planned storm drain is built in this area- RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6976 I Page 4 I;iscal lareous - X 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. X 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning "— Division report on subject property. 37. This property is not within.. the present City Boundary and will require annexation. 38_ All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: X 39. 'roper grading and erosion contrc including the preventation of sad9^enta- cion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow- -- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. X 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. llhen building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. X 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfe -e with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the fina' map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determine tion within the specified time limits of said Section. X 43. At the tim of Final I.-lap submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse -- e calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. X 46. Reciprocal access and parking easements ensuring access to parcels 1 to 3 and 4 to 7 inclusive over private roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided and the easements shall be noticed on the map. X 46. A blanket drainage easement for cross lot drainage shall be provided and delineated on the map. X 47. Grading plans for individual parcels shall be submitted for approval prior to construction are each lot. X 48. Appropriate drainage easements along the southerly boundary of parcel map are to be recorded as part of parcel map to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. Continued on attached page ............. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENCINEER -By: RCE 20 CITY ENGINEER'S REPOR- FOR PARCEL MAP N0. 69A- continued ..... X 49. On -site drainage imp coven Its, necessary for dewatering or protecting divided construction u on be 'nsrcelethati may be issuance sub subject to oricortribu estto,odrainage construction upon any permit flows entering, ieavinQ or within a parcel, relative to which a building p is requested. X 50. Grading ierw prior toaanyb grading twork within otheir n asnementaon the reast t r side of the pro,; 2ct . 11 E 11 E 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, -HE EXTENSION LOCAT'EDN ON THE SOUTH SID£f OF ARROW, ROUTE, REAST OFD HAVEN AVENUE kribedS, a project, ursua t to Section 1.50138 2(b) oft Ordinan Ordinance 28 -Be above- described project, p the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described Tentative Parcel Map. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following fin— ngs: A. That economic conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time; S. That external physical conditions have caused delay in the start of construction; C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent wiih the intent of the Zoning Ordinance; D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2• time extension for: TRACT 6976 The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a DEVELOPER B.C.G. Properties EXPIRATION September 9, 1984 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Panning Commission Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I 11 E U L °J E CJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1983 TO: Planning Commission. FROM: Lloyd G. Hubbs, City Engineer Bar: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SU$JECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8100 - BARMAKIAN - A division of acre s into parcels within the C- an R- zone located at the northeast corner of Foothill Blvd. and Ramona Avenue - APN 1077 -62- 28,31, Ref: D.R. 33 -17 I, PROJECT AND 5 >TE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: To divide 8.92 acres of land into 2 parcels. Parcel is to be the site for the development of 68 apartments submitted as D. R. 83 -17 on tonight's agenda. B. Purpose: To separate an R -3 zone from a C -2 zone. C. Location. North side of Foothill Blvd., east of Ramona Avenue. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 4.36 acres Parcel 2 4.06 acres TOTAL -8 acres E. Existing Zoning: Parcel 2 - C -2 F. Existin G. Surroun North - South - East - West - 3 and Use_ Vacant. Lin g Land Use and Zoning: s�ng�e family tract; R -3 C -2 single family tract; R -1 single family tract; R -1 H. Generel Plan Desi nations: North - low resi ential Z• -4 du /ac South - commercial East - low residential 2 -4 du /ac West - low residential 2 -4 du /ac Project site - Parcel 1 - medium residential 4 -14 du /;.c Parcel 2 - commercial ITEM F pLANNlnb COMMISSION STAFF Ktrurci parcel Map 8100 $eptember 14, 1983 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: Slopes to the south at approximately a 3% grade with an existing drainage channel at the east property lige. The site is vacant. 1I. ANALYSIS: Parcel Map 6100 is the division of 8.92 acres of land into 2 Parcels . Parcel 1 is the site for the development of 68 apartments submitted as D. R. 83 -17 on tonight's agenda. There are no plans for the development of Parcel 2 at this time. Improvements will be made at the time of development of each parcel except for storm drain installation which shall he done at the time of recordation of the map. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initia, S�udy as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation, upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. TV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners anu placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed, V. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then ado;;tion of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. fully sublritted, Lt BK:jaa Attachments: Map Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study y. Ell i I r L- ciV/ A //Vz-- OA "RCEL MAP No. 8/04 .� fb O� Tl.r •�� i e° 9: O° r S9ifJ/1�Oy7 TRACT I '• �/1'Q 9;x22 -/ ` STAFFJRDI STP.EET € 8 I 1may i V � 1 Ir.NSirr.� ijk'r ye I rf�• �'�. ox jam 0.11 D P —�N w - _�� 0 FOOTHILL BLVD - ✓s. u'N-c cnn' ytP•'!o c L W 7� ¢ z ° I � 2 , �I .1 I 11 E l L -% I 1 i 1 -- �-- -- d ile i STP i • CH® i�I1.LAS. APwbneft L SRO \, Q � \ PARCEL ! _ 1% 04 Z �0. CJ Q` '--B X l.°. ij C311VERT It It I ►�L i '�FSrac :X$ST. i t OPEN G�IANN£L ; PARCEL 2 r. -2 pppyY;L BOIiIVAM N r— XS' CONC. i ? CU'LV'ERT 0-2 Y - Y EXISTING DRA+NtZE PATTERN title; P M. tic +.tilp 4 CI'I'`i OF RANCHO CUCAN'IdNTGA Nn. 8100 ENGINEERING D1VISi0lTq rQ ~ 3 y DRAINAGE MAP page T q / �1 LJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA'dONGA INITIAL STUDY PART Z - PROJECT INFOP- MATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.000 For all projects requiring environmental review, this forxri must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the :,: project application is made. Upon receipt o� t � �..,s application., the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Stuff. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signr- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration wii= be filed, 2) The project will have a significant e vironmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional infor:n-tion report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: yMas r^m1nnas Parcel Man 8100 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Andrew Bar- ma kian, 9575 A—c4. -1, - ye'nue #101 Rancho m 1750 NP1E, ADDRESS, TEL= %PHOATE Same as ERSON To BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) NE corner Ramona P Foothill \nrrh 1551 LIST OTHER PE AMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE A-M FEDERAL AGEW_IES ArQD THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTIOT. OF PROJECT: ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, !F ANY:4.58 acres 57,140 sq. £t. . 1 i DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMPTION ON TCPOGRAPYY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORIC?. OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF AN-f EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of c-a=uiative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? is 1-2 11 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. --peat a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan, designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: I1M.PORTANT: If the project invoives the construction of residential units, comalete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data ar_d information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information ,.:ay be required to be subsitte re an adequate evaluation can be made b e meat evie c'orsai ee. Date ^Z slc ature Title I -3 y C RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The foilowing information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cuc.mon Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. :Apartments Specific Location of Project: NE corner of Ramona @ Foothill 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest dote -Df occupancy: Model and v of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range A $543 /mo. B $470 /mo. C —2 $415 /mo PEE I PHASE 2 PRASE 3 68 Sept 83 Mar 84 PHASE 4 TOTAL 2 BR 2 bath 44 units 2 Bit 1 bath 8 units 1 BR I bath 16 units I -4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8100 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8100), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL DOULEVARD, EAST SIDE OF RAMONA AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8100, submitted by Andrew Barmakian and consisting of 2 parcels, iocated on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east side of Ramona Avenue, being a division of a portion. of the south 1/2 of the west 1/2 of the southeast 114 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 1 south, Range 7 west, San Bernardino County, State of California; and WHEREAS, on July 7, 1983, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above- described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on September 14, 1983, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMPASSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1- That the following findings have teen made: 40 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. + �t +hc n,- nnnced subdivision is L. It: Q t. L 1C {n.vi V�cuR..t consistent with with the General Plan. 3. ' That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affect, on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this prcjject will not create significant adverse environmental impacts acid a Negative Declaration is issued on September :4, 1983. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8100 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA is BY: Resolution No. Page 2 ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, .JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of Septensber, 1933, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMlMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E] U 11 E Cm OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REcotWHOED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: North side of Foothill Blvd. TENTATIVE PARCEL NEAP NO: 81ii3 east side of Ramona Avenue DATE FILED:. July 7, 198; LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of the South 1,2 NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 the hest 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the GROSS ACREAGE: 8.92 4 of Section 2 T , San Bernardino DEVELOPER 2 1 South, ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 1077 -52- 28,31_ St of California r a• ENGINEEERISURVEYOR Andrew Barsrakian Farmer Jacks Anacai Engineering 9375 Archibald, #101 Nursery Land 246 N. Indian Hill P_^• Sex 3fi68 Rancho Cucaronga, GA 91730 Claremont, CA 91711 Anaheim, "A 92803 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Titles 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga incl�ide, but may not be limited to, the following: Dedications anG Vehicular Access 2. 3. Dedications shall be made of all :nr street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. X 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: Foothill Blvd. except one 50' wide driveway directly across from the south side driveway. _ 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all cormon roads, drives or parking areas Shall be provided by C..:.&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety X I. Surety shall be posted and an agre satisfaction of the City Engineer yuaranteeing completion of the public recording for storm drain facilities Permit issuance for street improvements ement executed to the and City Attorney, improvements prior to and prior to building for Parcels 1 and 2. X 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: 112 landscaped median island on Foothiil Blvd. 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewa*_ering all parcels to thc satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to issuance of building permit for Parcel 1. and 2. Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subidiver may enter into an agreement and post security with the City 9yjaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street: lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within. a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to recordation for Prior to building permit issuance for off -site improv,�ments for Parcels 1 and 2. Curb Street Name Gutter A.C. Pvmt. Sloe- Walk Drive Ap r.1 Street Trees Street Li hts A.C. overla P'edian 1,land* Other Ramona X =X X X. X X X Foothill j X X X X X X X *includes landscaping and irrigation fir meter Ll X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from tie City Engineer's office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street; improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power- poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X_ 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shell be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, trai °Ic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types ap, --uved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Plannirn division prior to the Issuance of building permit. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flocod Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff Gradin X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The fin -1 grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall by pi-epared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted a* the time of application or ;railing plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject_ to review and approval by the Grading Committee and -hall be carpleted prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuanc= of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be reojired as follows: X CalTrans for Foothill San Bernardino County Flood C ntro: District X Cucamonga County Water Distri ` for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Condition; and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) appro --d by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. Y. 3. Provide all utility services M each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas avd telephone prior to street c irstructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga _ County Water District standard;. A letter of aczeptance is required. X 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CaiTrans. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interf.sted agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. Wher building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and .,.-ter Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the frail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance With City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated coat of apportioning ',:he assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the new!" created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showir.j original land division, tie notes and bench mark. referenced. X 11. Applicable conditions of D.F. 83 -17 shall apply to this Parcel Map. ! X 12. Extensions of the existing east map boundary to the ex shall be required prior to and overflow provisions. drainage easements shall be U storm dra"i pipe system alorq the isting culvert acrosz Foothill :3lvd. recordation including catch basins All required on -site and off -site dedicated to the City. Cm OF RANCHO CUCAMM LLQYD•B_ H 865, CITY ENGINEER by: U L] F] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1983 10: Chairmar and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Jan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -17 - I N - The eve opment of apartment units on acres in tFie F •3 zone located on the east side of Ramona, north of Foothill - APN 1077- 621 -31 (a portion). Related File: Parcel Map 8100 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plans and elevations B. Purpose: Development of 68 apartment units C. Location: East side of Ramona, north of Foothill D. Parcel Size: 4.86 acres E. Existing Zoning: R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) F. Existina Land Use= Vacant H. General Plan Desi rations: G. Pra;ect Density Wdwelling units per acre H. Surrounding Land Use and ?onin North - single Fami ly Traci.: R -1 South - Vacant; C -2 West East - Single Family Tract; R -1 West - Single Family Tract; R -1 H. General Plan Desi rations: ojEct Site - Me ium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) North - Luw Residential (1 -4 du /ac) South - commercial East - Low Residential (2 -4 du /aq) West - Low Residential (2 -4 du/ac) ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review 83- 17 /Barinakian September 14, 1983 Page 2 E I. Site Characteristics: Slopes to the southeast at approximately to percent grade; existing drainage channel along east boundary, no existing structures, two existing mature trees. J. A licable Re ulati�ns: fhe R -3 zone permits apartment units w th . parking spaces per one bedroom unit and 1.6 spaces per two bedroom unit, plus one guest space for each four units. H. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing stacked apartment units to increase open space (over 60 percent) and maximise the number of dwelling units o?rm,itted for this property. The prcject has been designed at 14 dwelling units per acre. The dwelling units have been arranged in a random pattern around open space areas with one -story units around the perimeter ;Exhibit "C "). A row of garages is proposed along the scutherly boundary adjacent to future commercial development. B. Desix4n Review Committee: The Design Review Co T+ittee recommended approval subject to the following revisions: 1. "Flip" the site plan to place ti ;e enclosed garages on the south side of the project away from singe family residences and to s..reen future commercial. 2. Revise elevations to drop the top of the vertical flat surface below the ridge line of the the roof sections. 3. Provide single story units exclusively along the north project boundary adjacent to existing single family homes. Although the applicant has incorporated these changes in the project as shown on the attached exhibits, staff feels that there are several issues concerning the project design that should be discussed by the entire Commission. Specifically, the architectural design does not reflect the single family character or architectural style of the surrounding neighborhood. Architectural compatibility was a major concern during the review of the Marlborough Villa Townhomes across the street. These units were finally designed with a 1 -story or !-story stepping up to a 2 -story affect similar to the surrounding single 'ramify homes and with similar roof lines. Further, the Design Review Committee recommendation to drop the roof line will expose all the roof equipment previously screened by the parapet. The revised site plan proposes 1 -story apartments within 10 -18 feet of the rear property lines of the adjacent singly family residences. Also, eight car 7� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review 83- 17 /Barmakian September 14, 1983 Page 3 garage structures are proposed within 10 feet of the north and east property lines. Staff recommends that the dwelling units maintain a minimum 20 -foot setback and the garages a minimum i5 -foot setback. Based upon these concerns, staff has included necessary conditions of approval to address these matters. C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant is attached for your review. Based upon completion of Part II of the Initial Study, staff has found that no significant adverse impacts will occur as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and building design together with the recommended conditions are in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and City standards. I.'. rnoocccnknFwrTT This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Day y Report newspaper, the property posted and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. In addition, the applicant and staff have met twice with surrounding residents to receive their input. The residents identified three major areas of concern that are reflected in the attached conditions of approval: 1. Provide adequate fence /wall along the project perimeter for privacy and security (Condition 3). 2. Architectural designs should be compatible with surrounding residences (Condition 5). 3. Correct the existing drainage problems in the open channel (Condition 7). V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all material and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding, conditions of approval, and project design, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Res ect��ily7submi *_ted, Rick Gomi City:Plarner RG:DC:jr PLANNING COKMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review 83- 1: /Barmakian September 14, 1983 Page 4 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations Exhibit "F" - Floor Pans Exhibit "G" - Grading Plans Exhibit "3i" - Drainage Study Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions 11 11 CI i Y OF RANCHO CUCANIO\GAL PLAIN1N1NG DIVISIGN ITL'%,I: _' �'� • TITLE:t'T'� EXHIBIT. M_SCnL&. "'� FORTH 0 re: ' ivv sue— ,♦7.. �'i• r is •� O _ _ 1 I[ Q O O � M I UP 2M �:._•le.�su lore 11 mom.��. Aca- am r . ► ', •� __ � � f { Oa Oil �T �., a fit . V f Y c . m .I �trca� ��eo imlBpiH NORTH RANCHO • TITLE- PLANNING DWISION F-XHI BIT SCALE- E I�--i 10 Icc i s � STAFFORD STREET- 1 s z a a 0 s rir-7777,, `�111, a -ii CULVERT �\ ! PIPE PARCEL ci C!L QP I 4P _PARCEL 2 r •. OPEN I CHANNEL C-2 EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN 1 a I L I J—. I 2.. Ilk ca TI �44 --1-- 'IPE r —.. _E.S: AC 1 IST. PIPE ! 1 I I ' i- --3X$' CONC- X CULVERT VT aI If cn.ti1 . title; P EA. _ �°�c.�g�; CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,�IONGA '„ No. 8100 �'I > D.R. 83 -17 ENGINEERING DIVISION CX--1} DRAINAGE MAP N page RESOLUTION NO. q ?' - H 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 83 -17 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RAMONA, NORTH OF FOOTHILL IN THE R -3 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 24th day of June, 1983, a complete application was filed by Andrew Sarmakian for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th day of September, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above- described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and is 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued on September 14, 1983. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 83 -17 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Details of the garages, laundry facilities, and trash enclosures shall ha included in the final construction package. Garages and laundry buildings shall be designed compatible with the apartment elevations. 2. Approval of Development Review 83 -17 is granted subject to the approval of Parcel Map 8100. 11 7 LIJ Resolution No. Page 2 3. A six (6) foot perimeter block wall shall be construc-Ced along the northerly property lines. A stucco or piaster finish shall be required compatible with the apartment exterior finish. Developer shall be responsible to notify by Rail all contiguous property owners at least thirty (30) days prior to removal of the existing walls and fences along the northerly boundary of the anticipated removal date. 4. Two (2) existing mature trees shall be preserved and the site plan adjusted accordingly. 5. Revised elevations shall be submitted reflecting changes required by the C^moission for review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. 6. A fenced tot lot play area shall be provided. 7. Apartments shall maintain a ?0 -foot minimum setback and garages shall maintain a 15 -foot mir.imum setback along the northerly and easterly project boundary. ENGINEERING DIVISION 8. Drainage water shall be collected and controlled on -site and conveyed to a safe place for disposal satisfactory to the City Engineer and the Building Official-. 9. Tentative Parcei Map 8100 shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 10. All pertinent conditions of Parcel Map 8100 shall also apply to this project. 11. The developer shall be responsible for the improvement of east_ half of Ramona Avenue contiguous to Parcel 1 & 2 of Parcel Map 8100. The improvement shall also include the removal and replacement of the existing pavement to the centerline of the street. 12. The west half of Ramona Avenue from the north. parcel boundary to Faothill Boulevard shall be overlayed with asphalt concrete. The cost for this work will be reimbursed to the developer by the City. A reimbursement agreement should be executed prior to commencement of this paving. Resolution No. Page 3 13, Widening and improvement of east half of Ramona Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to the south project boundary (on Ramona) shall be required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer shall execute the standard reimbursement agreement with the City so that cost of this construction will be reimbursed to the developer at the time the parcels adjacent to these improvements are developed. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly intrnefi.ced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 L: L1 E' Q Z U CV i d C Z O J v r u H£ F c 11 0 U u c 4 O N 409D) 6Va � 0.Ln m p O N f � i d � L O � d q N u Y J dvv aW� 9 4 P ` V C C V ✓ ^' O�TJ q S9r C V � q �v ` � N q V T]•J d^ dC 6 ✓TP ✓ L Y Ya l'A� OV�sP °� Np`. coi '�°-� •9- y N! V M a .L• c T F YW O Nd acF. fi J-i _ S yOr >m�A ^ V O^ � p� CO q > _ n � O O d •� o. 6 pro p y y T N A M A P C n r V F d 0 A < r V V ^ Y U ✓ � c N q �' q a <� q �•• F L ^ d A [b�q ooy S y W A ao Ty v - N n A -o ,apc W N y✓ N v A < O q oV e ^ y .Z2 ! V N O C V t A G O V O C A -) C P Y✓ N N " F q N q✓ < �d A Z C .L.' O N E N 4 V^ P N N N C P N N ✓ p1 g B M dOprL� l t i QPq E d Q N py�M VW S�N b � M_ O•q ^9 ✓T 'O��L CwJO �P� Tb✓ p NE �.NV O n.✓ n{ z V o yCY ` V V J d q A N w. >✓✓ A� y r V C y {L V j d C E y 0�C q J g A V q C Z O J v r u H£ F c 11 0 U u c 4 O N 409D) 6Va � 0.Ln m p O N f � i d � L O � d q N u Y J dvv aW� 9 4 P ` V C C V ✓ ^' O�TJ q S9r C V � q �v ` � N q V T]•J d^ dC 6 ✓TP Ya l'A� OV�sP n `$A •9- y N! d A n F YW O Nd acF. fi _ S yOr CV T'^ Ta ^ V O^ p� CO La _ n 6� d •� o. 6 pro p y y q p n n V V a Pq O r c _ O d U d^a S y d O YS• N N A L CV! P A S O V Fu' e y N 4 W S I d L J L> " F q N q✓ < �d A Z C .L.' O N C NZ d N r O �W M dOprL� l t > C y q✓ O O E <�� d Q N E Ya l'A� OV�sP n `$A Yq N � q • ^° N F YW O y L •�. J1 E � _ S yOr CV T'^ Ta ^ V O^ p� CO [-LNO n 6� HOM •� o. 6 pro ^ T Yq N � q • ^° F YW O y L •�. J1 oY _ S yOr CV T'^ Ta 9 p� CO YV P C Ap O r tl r u d d V ✓ yO L V N p C q� ff YS• a E O T V N'✓ �d OC 11 ✓p N. M. CL� w OV �.NV n.✓ z V yCY VJG UN CM V n• 0�C q J g A V q C d 9 rn q ^ M O w ` O q y N J V ^ N N W MnN da °� od-, ° °N o P s°o ° Ap_�°p�� co ^ = o�. P ^ c ✓_ do A C na 6 C ° 6 Y V W �^ F 6 q ✓ M N jF � P q O `�.Y 0 C C � C d y q P ✓ �� N' � V G ✓ V C C N`. ^y�'Y> ✓p ACgV .�qn U V✓ 0 6 J <+Npp 9 U 6 V E 8 n V N ✓• E N i0 V F V y N ✓ � + p V(�]Jy1 1 I ✓ L O Z Y U CL) C5 C L d A ^PY -aL yid ^O.YI VN -a yCe pCQ bP ^✓d 9y Vyu.r �aNVOL�.Ti� <_ <:C � 'N WAG ✓�r00 V C u u n WC^Or J 4 O n ^ L �, VL CU V ` Y N✓ 6�L l uOQ V. -t�O n O `� A C a�w qTi y =..: °O" • ^a"Ly.a :° .'.� Win Er O - ur. nWU nO�EVV O��VTr��6 Usd.d�V �J F. "� �Y.C•.. Y()A pYyd ° A L Q A,� ai•T�j EEuY OUTNU EIS •'nL ^d .- Gy.� �c ^bN LW Lea c ^rW c ac' iMCYTp�G�cu ��` 'O Oc g 4EdL` dcq+J o °c WY �b W qo qL °an+W W S,•°i ca�� y�a.o � `o °o mss. i ^Y i.. a i LDO _n'. LD �Q�Y r ` L' ^^ a E'.♦ ^m q L _ .L. C]j NC .L. r . ^ o. rTV L VO I Ci ^L „u OOgV Jd>.� w•-� C � f C =CLL C�rL OCd -�ZN^ ^ O LT D�YU3•.L YC q n �E VY CcV Vdq ti TC� a ^uc° �u cV•WiDY qN l ° a ^. QN�j LY nco rq0 r0 a Eyrr•.Ln QF..V ^CW q � ON✓TWUlb6p�Vr Z' A LL q W N� O r N C b.. Q .W. E e W N �A b L Fi ° ..q a o� v. - n^ •.�° a�W r � c�bE�r g.Fyr�` or o.`cd „w N.di do °a rA MN _ y” q o'er ^Fd Ya Q b Q d4 YY.q o OrS . Q 0 0 e°, °_ Nor W c Lq aG era.' e�.s. mvN 'qoa NLL n a ,G°a� ^q.a m�€.rD�`a`^,rgs� syoa+ .si �oY.v y.°Wa °��� oo � i � ` oa•`� q'^"LO ELL a Tt Y9QL t�N T VCNTn q.r OVr� TY • �QYO y PCB tY.y q O 2' •� 1, g- UC CLL ALrd 6. Q l Wr > rn4 YCT VW O L o NvT -�°„ ✓b aaNW m O N ✓.- Y rV'k ^O•- J YCG Y q Lam. i c t ✓C A .. P a q c✓ r Y a d v OR.G — c e C G T Z.2 cr go I��N T C LE ✓6 L60L 66 S� LYE- 6�Vg6Q2 iq 2� 6QN LI O Wa.• Gam- q QL •�QLLQ rW �C N QOTU b Q aYY-N n V W V ^ u • O > C s= u q L N .� V O ^ � A r Y V✓ N L ELI, ' V V O^ Q M N l •, C y^ A C p 9 {t D L A i� N v. t Y N �O q l N O .Oa � V �` v P` L N g ` Q •.' >. ^ G .✓i. u ^✓ V N L 7�✓ V_ •. „ Y V •^ ^ a. L N 0 U D q Y r F vPOy q_C �.0 G 6b C J > C 5.E r^ T M N • 6` Q C a n Qp� •� N ^V L y C p Q A O Y n • L E Y N d u N q .CO .On L _ F L ✓ V N „ N9 V N ✓ X p V C b C P y. N n O •". T i Qr G L b r�PCYgV qLq L` ^ •. O g Y C 2 D `C N .D'OV C C C Q C O Q N D V �L•OL O Q✓ y r V 6 r Oa .^ G j _ FW Y TVO LuOC V - CA _VQO 6... NgNyr Yy CQ9 NC >P LnOC V n GC Q �oAC l ^ L rA LQ p yAL ✓ dL {LjC O J d O �GpJ .W - A O V ✓� pV . C .N . OT 2^ VD l Pr � QV D P.0 T C y Q = O0 V LL T ° NYC ` N • O .Zp y•Cn u Q V O O^ l=� yN6� N C N NSY LwCi` . ^ C = C lQ PO CC YP ON • Y 2 NC ^ �WCC � T�qG CN PFW uTJW TN� oLL JA >C CQ Oi'C L D9 — ON� ��V Y. J V .•NV 'C� ^ nV • -a Q� L JA TOW qU QLYrr V` d u n` A N a q- nQ W N �•. >. F J U O -- °� U V —o L Q �^ V Y >. J O V V a V d L V r r onL is oa Y L✓ r N V • -- oc ^_ L o b V E —gin W W o�vs �.L..i N' W` C �^ V 0 z Y U L d E Ll G V T A`mvv V C ° ` O ✓ _ O V q O AgvD =P . P N G P N y it N 9 L p _ 1: qP� C >r 09 F V9 rc> �✓ N O C b r C V C 'J O 4 0 + C^ V 4 Y ° V Tr ✓ '.. ar C 6Y> P C4 iN _ L 7 C V V C V 9V^ ^0 �y0 L „VOL NrQ �� °oc Cu ar r- au✓ �' . `o' 1 �l Pi ✓ P _ O� O C 4 L S 6 y J C 9 V .Lw Y✓ A pO � r N p A L � V V pLY L>'6C r rE L, eY9w rr L N C p� M Nq ✓ C L V C Eti ` U b J E c N c d y c L E ✓T 2� �L LL gefJ L p ✓00 V L P M p Q L C r �rr A L ✓ L r C •' C + u T � O r P N M y✓ V ��d .. r� G6• rV i V � 9 n � A O 7 y G ^ O N T s a A q0'V OVa ��V YAp V L 9 6 N e _ y L N 4 .L dip y ^Y dr �9 G M dO•'-J Lo QC^ V > t a C p1 O.0 O E O V Y✓ YL >� C O O' 6O E y C V L m od L «q� O`q 9GYV d ✓ = 0 T GA a 9 q r q q O C L+ q � 4 i rc. J a.Gr N9�0 Vr � ` O C L.aiY o^+ E �N G7 ✓C L V d L 9 M s ° G E O L Or PO D ` GZ y~ ✓ � O D C ° ` n 4 V O C ✓ N 6� � °p 9 ✓ V D N ! T N N N ✓ L V 6Nd `d P6 ✓O O fJ C Y N V ✓ C G P> E E O ` COO N O 6 G r0 V 9T O ✓p a) O e ” F M O V`✓ C G �_ V� Lm6 LN O� LO F• q r V � V Gm G V �C6 VVp O L CQ r CrE OL iL Cq DOA' r AN Or �✓ ^ C d V O � C >^ CL °LC •OSyY ^D r L'l` yyyy yL `N • b °� YT✓q�r .� °O N Y p�0 Lpi G �Yt p dOL ` ^pr MT' i' P` -Z Lp£^ r N C� g V Cy O V NY O°_OD AFN Y�N Vo rO�NrV 9 yq= duC qF . D OCgi6r9�. VSO 6Q0•M p.-Cq G�VVOL..O Aw^ C PY yL� m^ G Pq pLy O ^Oa^ OLEO F N _ P O C O. q Y at C i0 C d 4 V9 yOq LD9�L°j9 T^ °V9 <GOiO DP7 Pqa CY{JT VOQ mrOd IC : ^i�E Tyy r °� L i 4 l O •7 OL P i ✓ p L � N'• �d�� '}PV y Vrl' •r �a A cc ✓q. Nc �N � .L ✓^ t O y a C N� JI W Ye Y O. Y L m NL O C POO• q V _J✓ N qqS V V V l Lr t N N O q C y V i OI L 'r6 Ti q q e O r Pr^ Y L OL ^P > ✓_ O o ✓ �V� r Y�' OArO Zp � P p0 6 �rO rwr V O C V 9 O C L r y�q p O y V � V � N q Cf � O• y M .ANN IIr ! O ^ 0 0 �E GO��pNQQ V �LN�ryO E rr��gA °iii m ✓ T VLaN r a° wMOi y� G�� ✓ t i O 2 4 q OM r r�3VD T r p l e E G E r L I C• O N o G ^ D✓ O 9 l PCP L t I q P 1: qP� C >r 09 F V9 rc> �✓ N O C b r C V C 'J O 4 0 + C^ V 4 Y ° V Tr ✓ '.. ar C 6Y> P C4 iN _ L 7 C V V C V 9V^ ^0 �y0 L „VOL NrQ �� °oc Cu ar r- au✓ �' . `o' 1 �l Pi ✓ P _ O� O C 4 L S 6 y J C 9 V .Lw Y✓ A pO � r N p A L � V V pLY L>'6C r rE L, eY9w rr L N C p� M Nq ✓ C L V C Eti ` U b J E c N c d y c L E ✓T 2� �L LL gefJ L p ✓00 V L P M p Q L C r �rr A L ✓ L r C •' C + u T � O r P N M y✓ V ��d .. r� G6• rV i V � 9 n � A O 7 y G ^ O N T s a A q0'V OVa ��V YAp V L 9 6 N e _ y L N 4 .L dip y ^Y dr �9 G M dO•'-J Lo QC^ V > t a C p1 O.0 O E O V Y✓ YL >� C O O' 6O E y C V L m od L «q� O`q 9GYV d ✓ = 0 T GA a 9 q r q q O C L+ q � 4 i rc. J a.Gr N9�0 Vr � ` O C L.aiY o^+ E �N G7 ✓C L V d L 9 M s ° G E O L Or PO D ` GZ y~ ✓ � O D C ° ` n 4 V O C ✓ N 6� � °p 9 ✓ V D N ! T N N N ✓ L V 6Nd `d P6 ✓O O fJ C Y N V ✓ C G P> E E O ` COO N O 6 G r0 V 9T O ✓p a) O e ” F M O V`✓ C G �_ V� Lm6 LN O� LO F• q r V � V Gm G V �C6 VVp O L CQ r CrE OL iL Cq DOA' r AN Or �✓ ^ C d V O � C >^ CL °LC •OSyY ^D r L'l` yyyy yL `N • b °� YT✓q�r .� °O N Y p�0 Lpi G �Yt p dOL ` ^pr MT' i' P` -Z Lp£^ r N C� g V Cy O V NY O°_OD AFN Y�N Vo rO�NrV 9 yq= duC qF . D OCgi6r9�. VSO 6Q0•M p.-Cq G�VVOL..O Aw^ C PY yL� m^ G Pq pLy O ^Oa^ OLEO F N _ P O C O. q Y at C i0 C d 4 V9 yOq LD9�L°j9 T^ °V9 <GOiO DP7 Pqa CY{JT VOQ mrOd IC : ^i�E Tyy r °� L i 4 l O •7 OL P i ✓ p L � N'• �d�� '}PV y Vrl' •r �a A cc ✓q. Nc �N � .L ✓^ t O y a C N� JI W Ye Y O. Y L m NL O C POO• q V _J✓ N qqS V V V l Lr t N N O q C y V i OI L 'r6 Ti q q e O r Pr^ Y L OL ^P > ✓_ O o ✓ �V� r Y�' OArO Zp � P p0 6 �rO rwr V O C V 9 O C L r y�q p O y V � V � N q Cf � O• y M .ANN IIr ! O ^ 0 0 �E GO��pNQQ V �LN�ryO E rr��gA °iii m ✓ T VLaN r r ✓ 4 Tp �� G G�� ✓ t i O 2 2 i n° C q t O` N N� i C� q O E C• O O 9 l P ^ D✓ O 9 l PCP L L p EN 4 4C e ey6y L LYN '�°.r= E VJ q q AL e ry i i V C 0 Z Z �-Z C e V C Vpj- . `o' 1 �l Pi ✓ P _ O� O C 4 L S 6 y J C 9 V .Lw Y✓ A pO � r N p A L � V V pLY L>'6C r rE L, eY9w rr L N C p� M Nq ✓ C L V C Eti ` U b J E c N c d y c L E ✓T 2� �L LL gefJ L p ✓00 V L P M p Q L C r �rr A L ✓ L r C •' C + u T � O r P N M y✓ V ��d .. r� G6• rV i V � 9 n � A O 7 y G ^ O N T s a A q0'V OVa ��V YAp V L 9 6 N e _ y L N 4 .L dip y ^Y dr �9 G M dO•'-J Lo QC^ V > t a C p1 O.0 O E O V Y✓ YL >� C O O' 6O E y C V L m od L «q� O`q 9GYV d ✓ = 0 T GA a 9 q r q q O C L+ q � 4 i rc. J a.Gr N9�0 Vr � ` O C L.aiY o^+ E �N G7 ✓C L V d L 9 M s ° G E O L Or PO D ` GZ y~ ✓ � O D C ° ` n 4 V O C ✓ N 6� � °p 9 ✓ V D N ! T N N N ✓ L V 6Nd `d P6 ✓O O fJ C Y N V ✓ C G P> E E O ` COO N O 6 G r0 V 9T O ✓p a) O e ” F M O V`✓ C G �_ V� Lm6 LN O� LO F• q r V � V Gm G V �C6 VVp O L CQ r CrE OL iL Cq DOA' r AN Or �✓ ^ C d V O � C >^ CL °LC •OSyY ^D r L'l` yyyy yL `N • b °� YT✓q�r .� °O N Y p�0 Lpi G �Yt p dOL ` ^pr MT' i' P` -Z Lp£^ r N C� g V Cy O V NY O°_OD AFN Y�N Vo rO�NrV 9 yq= duC qF . D OCgi6r9�. VSO 6Q0•M p.-Cq G�VVOL..O Aw^ C PY yL� m^ G Pq pLy O ^Oa^ OLEO F N _ P O C O. q Y at C i0 C d 4 V9 yOq LD9�L°j9 T^ °V9 <GOiO DP7 Pqa CY{JT VOQ mrOd IC : ^i�E Tyy r °� L i 4 l O •7 OL P i ✓ p L � N'• �d�� '}PV y Vrl' •r �a A cc ✓q. Nc �N � .L ✓^ t O y a C N� JI W Ye Y O. Y L m NL O C POO• q V _J✓ N qqS V V V l Lr t N N O q C y V i OI L 'r6 Ti q q e O r Pr^ Y L OL ^P > ✓_ O o ✓ �V� r Y�' OArO Zp � P p0 6 �rO rwr V O C V 9 O C L r y�q p O y V � V � N q Cf � O• y M .ANN IIr ! O ^ 0 0 �E GO��pNQQ V �LN�ryO E rr��gA °iii m V � 9 n � A O 7 y G ^ O N T s a A q0'V OVa ��V YAp V L 9 6 N e _ y L N 4 .L dip y ^Y dr �9 G M dO•'-J Lo QC^ V > t a C p1 O.0 O E O V Y✓ YL >� C O O' 6O E y C V L m od L «q� O`q 9GYV d ✓ = 0 T GA a 9 q r q q O C L+ q � 4 i rc. J a.Gr N9�0 Vr � ` O C L.aiY o^+ E �N G7 ✓C L V d L 9 M s ° G E O L Or PO D ` GZ y~ ✓ � O D C ° ` n 4 V O C ✓ N 6� � °p 9 ✓ V D N ! T N N N ✓ L V 6Nd `d P6 ✓O O fJ C Y N V ✓ C G P> E E O ` COO N O 6 G r0 V 9T O ✓p a) O e ” F M O V`✓ C G �_ V� Lm6 LN O� LO F• q r V � V Gm G V �C6 VVp O L CQ r CrE OL iL Cq DOA' r AN Or �✓ ^ C d V O � C >^ CL °LC •OSyY ^D r L'l` yyyy yL `N • b °� YT✓q�r .� °O N Y p�0 Lpi G �Yt p dOL ` ^pr MT' i' P` -Z Lp£^ r N C� g V Cy O V NY O°_OD AFN Y�N Vo rO�NrV 9 yq= duC qF . D OCgi6r9�. VSO 6Q0•M p.-Cq G�VVOL..O Aw^ C PY yL� m^ G Pq pLy O ^Oa^ OLEO F N _ P O C O. q Y at C i0 C d 4 V9 yOq LD9�L°j9 T^ °V9 <GOiO DP7 Pqa CY{JT VOQ mrOd IC : ^i�E Tyy r °� L i 4 l O •7 OL P i ✓ p L � N'• �d�� '}PV y Vrl' •r �a A cc ✓q. Nc �N � .L ✓^ t O y a C N� JI W Ye Y O. Y L m NL O C POO• q V _J✓ N qqS V V V l Lr t N N O q C y V i OI L 'r6 Ti q q e O r Pr^ Y L OL ^P > ✓_ O o ✓ �V� r Y�' OArO Zp � P p0 6 �rO rwr V O C V 9 O C L r y�q p O y V � V � N q Cf � O• y M .ANN IIr ! O ^ 0 0 �E GO��pNQQ V �LN�ryO E rr��gA °iii m N9�0 Vr � ` O C L.aiY o^+ E �N G7 ✓C L V d L 9 M s ° G E O L Or PO D ` GZ y~ ✓ � O D C ° ` n 4 V O C ✓ N 6� � °p 9 ✓ V D N ! T N N N ✓ L V 6Nd `d P6 ✓O O fJ C Y N V ✓ C G P> E E O ` COO N O 6 G r0 V 9T O ✓p a) O e ” F M O V`✓ C G �_ V� Lm6 LN O� LO F• q r V � V Gm G V �C6 VVp O L CQ r CrE OL iL Cq DOA' r AN Or �✓ ^ C d V O � C >^ CL °LC •OSyY ^D r L'l` yyyy yL `N • b °� YT✓q�r .� °O N Y p�0 Lpi G �Yt p dOL ` ^pr MT' i' P` -Z Lp£^ r N C� g V Cy O V NY O°_OD AFN Y�N Vo rO�NrV 9 yq= duC qF . D OCgi6r9�. VSO 6Q0•M p.-Cq G�VVOL..O Aw^ C PY yL� m^ G Pq pLy O ^Oa^ OLEO F N _ P O C O. q Y at C i0 C d 4 V9 yOq LD9�L°j9 T^ °V9 <GOiO DP7 Pqa CY{JT VOQ mrOd IC : ^i�E Tyy r °� L i 4 l O •7 OL P i ✓ p L � N'• �d�� '}PV y Vrl' •r �a A cc ✓q. Nc �N � .L ✓^ t O y a C N� JI W Ye Y O. Y L m NL O C POO• q V _J✓ N qqS V V V l Lr t N N O q C y V i OI L 'r6 Ti q q e O r Pr^ Y L OL ^P > ✓_ O o ✓ �V� r Y�' OArO Zp � P p0 6 �rO rwr V O C V 9 O C L r y�q p O y V � V � N q Cf � O• y M .ANN IIr ! O ^ 0 0 �E GO��pNQQ V �LN�ryO E rr��gA °iii m dOL ` ^pr MT' i' P` -Z Lp£^ r N C� g V Cy O V NY O°_OD AFN Y�N Vo rO�NrV 9 yq= duC qF . D OCgi6r9�. VSO 6Q0•M p.-Cq G�VVOL..O Aw^ C PY yL� m^ G Pq pLy O ^Oa^ OLEO F N _ P O C O. q Y at C i0 C d 4 V9 yOq LD9�L°j9 T^ °V9 <GOiO DP7 Pqa CY{JT VOQ mrOd IC : ^i�E Tyy r °� L i 4 l O •7 OL P i ✓ p L � N'• �d�� '}PV y Vrl' •r �a A cc ✓q. Nc �N � .L ✓^ t O y a C N� JI W Ye Y O. Y L m NL O C POO• q V _J✓ N qqS V V V l Lr t N N O q C y V i OI L 'r6 Ti q q e O r Pr^ Y L OL ^P > ✓_ O o ✓ �V� r Y�' OArO Zp � P p0 6 �rO rwr V O C V 9 O C L r y�q p O y V � V � N q Cf � O• y M .ANN IIr ! O ^ 0 0 �E GO��pNQQ V �LN�ryO E rr��gA °iii m Z i•1 J y O i a Pr -c•v ar - a P v a P P d Pa >. c as a ^dPC or.+�• c� ca `c c cc a oq ct u ••^ a ^-' ✓ u• G y G+ t E V a L q > > N + q� W d O i O r O O m P � l o y .4.. � � d i � E •O+ _ P G :rC Vj�d 6N V^ C CWq L ^ >•O u•e �YY N 4 O '`r �L �. U •r m 4 9 ,•� u _V .� G L J ° O N p r! q _ V•')'^ O = .rr L G fL.! C Cw^ ` O y D>j C O V •> C N C ^ C V O • J . q C7 9✓ U f' q y 9 a V q 0 ° O� d T '•J' N � ' 9 G r +6.0 `4V C • O aV q �. 9 °c ✓ry � ^'� �� TG 5 O E O° W ✓ P` V M E V n ^ N ^ OL V O y d q V ✓ 9 P J C ^ D G � q G •� i d � V W Z7 O n P� ` d a° L C 4 E T 4 G 9 C l 6✓ C� O n G m C O✓ L ° C L C ^` q i t q i` C 9 N G D V V> ^ d G e✓ d_ V W O L L n •t.. r ^ t ^ m C G� Q= ny _ . C a JCr __✓ p >G9 a LJ °✓ er ^^ ✓ Ln0 ° tJ.. ^ L N✓ r+ N V q a_ ✓ ✓wV OC°✓O ✓O• t` O.. J VdpVaq LV VN p O N 0� V• Tar ° L n r. D a O g y � G ✓✓ q L V r COGV 9N Pp T N P.r9 V'� G� c•o -.c +� Jim >G vq V^ Y acaor� i PL nE 4i2 M E E^ E N � O r V d 4 y[� V + 2 O ✓ ✓�~ n 11' q 9 g L G G _ T �+ _ •rCC T 4 W P P L P✓ O H FF y U -z'9, L C .vy qNO INVE� -I 'L9 ✓P^ rV P CCr L� • j ✓P. p �N= ` r >q+ .✓i. nas me °`ewe P i �a � —s?d^ �.cn�.• L� o ^+ �c.Q —qnv v q+ m oe _ �O 6VD Wti° WVV 06 f.'Jj py65 l r N WN rl Q G N 11 Q "J Y .5 2 e q q O ✓� m✓ y r✓ __ ✓•� y C G V 6 q O C O r✓ N N 4 c �� c`V Y ro^ �Ip°`�a Jq W✓ 4 E c T G o V L m z g E N y qr Via C ^44 M N=w^ V9�6 r 2 O _ C v l •.' P d SC E ^+ _ L Piy ~ O N 9NLVE O'JVO O a o`ni c `�✓i ✓•. .°.% -ate i' i c"y mi<4n av +• ' D •V O N E `i G� N. J q G L 'W v V�T�E V76 Gr L � 4 G ✓ G w E d T. q E� 2 U ✓✓ 4 V r- °✓ • y� 4 ✓� t^ N 4Cj g P 0 0 T O 4 D q �O aQV �` L V✓ �G> d O .Li•F +y nEy ^✓ d N J d l 4 r O O 4 L a D= OI •C q ^ C` N NOGG d H I 0 6 y� W q^ y L N m � Y ._.. q Y C~ V S O • O wg - V 1( C V I �d N^ N ^•'fir ✓� .-. O ✓CgOi vOrCV JCC� NI ✓ W w W '" N E O V ✓__ f > q S u. =` O g V V N 4 00 T TOr L= ° �V V `b VV PN Or V .0 O G G V E o q✓ o L ✓ a G.` y G G =I O L G U[{ m n +_ T O d I •V+ P i 4 O S� F{ m w c• V O y C ES \ \ \ \G�V✓ rG G✓ 6 � I 1 1 3 WNG �yyI ��1VWL 1 � 1 cl NI I r 1 I* rl 11 I 0 Z U d a y d d q tl d ^ N E w d 9 r i L 'J > Nz O P- L ` Z. N y v n• _N IJ O D G 9.'• ` i A M C - � q T P C L R ° LO u mom^ mv°o c r+ y t o L g Nid" Cg Su G q 9 V y A W d N 9 ^ C C V I m -^ N i C v z O N W V•^ N i N Gq jpP �^ Cr O O O ^eLAU L t L qa - L A° O N ^C7✓ J 6 ^ArC C °00 G A meNO —NO ✓D CMG l' m L evv 94 NI bI P L q a• G`Q e b T C 7 V` ^ cum « � d i m`GE o A > V _ � A _ G P9 waC i = q N 4q�q IJ. L Q O > q 6L q � a ^ M O+ ^ A r S O C p T9 d V NV�J A � A M� �1 mi ✓ C A Zq V m qa P +� C L ° q 90 ow- ^ t •a V ✓ „p0 q C p d+ mq✓ N S� p aLi e .•. e N ✓ O � C 6 y ✓ a` Yq a N d m V L + q O G � 6 � 0 v 0p.�9 N 6 • e _T u v d V q m� D L m 6 O H ° N 0 506 d A L 7 n r_ d R ID A a a. 0 T b =� NA =9 GD 9 C d O y ° L � C N Y A nyE N� ✓ � u d ^+ c aQi u: Y Ti y moo a L 4 dmVO F ^= A M C - � q T P C L R ° LO ATE^ q a 6 d g d y t o L g Nid" Cg Su q a ` d N 9 ^ C C V I m -^ N I v z o 4 > .YO yN C Gq jpP �^ Cr O O O ^eLAU L t L qa - L A° O ✓w ^C7✓ J 6 ^ArC C °00 G A s q + ++ NI bI P L q a• G`Q e b T C 7 V` ^ cum « � d i m`GE o A > V _ � A _ G P9 waC i = q N 4q�q IJ. L Q O > q 6L q � a ^ M O+ ^ A r S O C p T9 d V NV�J A � A M� �1 mi ✓ C A Zq V m qa P +� C L ° q 90 ow- ^ t •a V ✓ „p0 q C p d+ mq✓ N S� p aLi e .•. e N ✓ O � C 6 y ✓ a` Yq a N d m V L + q O G � 6 � 0 v 0p.�9 N 6 • e _T u v d V q m� D L m 6 O H ° N 0 506 d A L 7 n r_ d R ID A a a. 0 T b =� NA =9 GD 9 C d O y ° L � C N Y A nyE N� ✓ � u d ^+ c aQi u: Y Ti C 4r y moo 4 d �✓N„ °u A M C - � A P C L R ° ATE^ q a Nid" Cg Su 9 > ✓ E d A L 2 C V N 6 C C 4r y 9 ^ A M C - � A P C L R ° Y E T Nid" Cg Su 9 > ✓ E d A L 2 C V C C V I . P I v z o 4 C G C C jpP �^ Cr O O O ° t°J SAN K t L N� f N i Or -N O.YO - J'CCPON Or9P �O-. 6 L_ C_ y O ✓ J Np �" p °i m:%E •°•C t r °o =.o t R V rG q 7 y O N az ✓ 9 _ w✓ A r+ d° L tZ O q 6 Y°.VJCA OY - :j ✓NA G S t ' -q ANA i t= V d O U C N L L t P L jmt r. _2_ 15 `E -c C cRr V^ n'. NN rGE d +GOe �� yO PE6q C C O 4 q` O L q ✓ d a q n p D C M O R —E ^L .LODa 60VVO PA O u q m F 0 E P C c V W O 6 O J N i A uc.. ao F.N W N J O: .6 S4 I N Z m ✓ O � r E acv ^ .o o: m � Y uu I Q W I C N e P q 9 P T O r d n G ✓ C d A .dw V i 9 T e q N O V ` m Z yS O > Y L v � `O t V C� ^ N ` Am N r =q = q L l R y O q ry T ° i E ° .m °a va do i Lr) ° L P C L R ° Y E T N o O C M �✓ Ol m C V I I +o G C C O t O O O RN v m W m 4✓ Y ^ArC C °00 s q + ++ q dd Q T E evv 94 E o ' N d wI ^ N N L 4 ql f I q` C . V W 1 I VI C1I 1 WI J e P q 9 P T O r d n G ✓ C d A .dw V i 9 T e q N O V ` m Z yS O > Y L v � `O t V C� ^ N ` Am N r =q = q L l R y O q ry T ° i E ° .m °a va do i Lr) L 1 O Z Y U d O 1 O d O G g O u O O ° ' �> >° r i 9 gv�on � � ✓ Nq ° = I V� L s `c°n .di .`.+ 'o E c i -' I r C b c •= iqO u 6N I Py u yN d y i j 9 °= •° n q i ! A C N E a = d< ui d C T d _ ^� 4 p uC �G{ q� 9 L O O r• O L N � _ �•9 � o_r I •'r � z y 2 6 .L..• _ -J C V° C O q V C L O V V � N � N P O 0 P L V y O V O y 2✓ gr Y Nd I AN N- L N • ° C � ✓ GI qq C VLO V L_ Yom. o� G r �9 r d O L fI q •. O v �• r O YL OY If°d,d_N T >� N 1y I L j O 9 1-9 r I ✓_�� KpN �w JS � �2^ F-�L• I 1 1 QY 6NJ t� = o CV �[ O M v L % V N i Y V _ O N m N a NO i L vv` G 4 4 V CN w a �- M V 9 � V 2 p e r c4 = = • N q _ 4 4J ON O q 4 O {\ 3 p V V q At Ll. �O� VL `✓ rrOy O I i =0V C L O V C•J i L y C =0�a� O.V� T ✓Cn i c__ N _ L _� O J O q Cc ° V V S O Z •qr u N a N O _ i O a O f r C• N % m of S i L EppE.. ✓ V O G L ✓dr P MOB 1 NM— --.9r ig w q E dl °OLv o— oNC° p � T � N_° r av aN an ✓� OE K 9Gt •"Hr V C M�e�d O VoN' r O L_ Y � i a• Oz �• O � $ V O� y a q �' < y u� Li. Oi n� IQ 0 `W C Nt O Tq N9 T dP0 m i p 2 L Cu n ��- C r= P6 £ s °— p✓ W d_ V G 0YM d..° —79 C O � r•'• V dP_M V 9 C L y � d r 9 q T M 9 q� r� d L V W L I4 O •O � �� P T 9 C V L • L O a V O O N Y nO ' IC C J r C.L.. pL pq v L V PE `� Tpr C v NC rG 9_ ^ CCW N� r V _ ygrj p uV L L ' a s— p� V� N u i ¢• +• C q V veC.� E yOj d. l •• '£` ° ° bq c •�''� �0 9_ `t'e qqt ac pai• E n ovd be � - n yr° � 4 T:.0 o^e r v _W Tarn m ° �O M epY a�L� Ti 9r P Y y_W m ✓L G N9 UC =�Cd 6r r ' O U L yS Y? N U� 9 ° ��✓ V— V O• °� 9 P O i a W V O L L N C ` W C � V V • r t N� r � L✓✓ pa W r V r __ u L 9 JO 16 � � n V q M° i t � � � N b � �` O� T q VP V O� Q•q Lw _m N L� r _ d0' LVG r .T• —� >N 'CC — bar Y QV IC 6•Lr.V NpW 6u Oro NMV n.`r QV`6- WrN lLV �1 CV �[ O M v L % V N i Y V _ O N m N a NO i L vv` G 4 4 V CN w a �- M V 9 � V 2 p e r c4 = = • N q _ 4 4J ON O q 4 O {\ 3 p V V q At Ll. U C: O i d 0 1` i a c i Pu p^ r r ^ p g E r `• r i�� `• � q C O C r M 7 y � � L � � N w ` �d �� rr GL pN= pdT V6g 06 O� I bO� tq N d�N ` D E u N car Go u I c N� rn�u qI DJ Vd V y VE I OLCV d r M q j G� C� V Myy r O i A J C L I q Q O yL E` VV dy G6 � j•.r rL_ 1 � V0 qN•u GI � O �•� �� �q0 OtV 4 rV � G O 1 �O CJ wI\\1 � _ 6 1` 11 l J 11 CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1983 10: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Pick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -13 - LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE - The establishment of a Moose Lodge in an existing 1550 sq. ft. industrial unit in the General Industrial area (Subarea 4), located at 9375 Archibald Avenue - APN 210 - 071 -48. PROJECT AND Sir DESCRIPTION: The applicant is seeking approval of a onaitiona Use Permit or a Moose Lodge to conduct regularly scheduled meetings in an existing industrial complex (Archicenter) located at 9375 Archibald Avenue (Exhibit °A "). The proposed use will occupy approximately 1550 square feet of the industrial center which may be expanded in the future. The Moose Lodge, as an institution of approximately 60 members, will occupy the industrial building once a week on Tuesday evenings between the hours of 8:00 and 9:00 p.m. Social activities consist of Sunday morning breakfasts and occasional Friday and Saturday evening dinners. Attendance at these functions usually equates to between 35 -40 people. It is anticipated that future membership may reach 100 members. At this time, a women's chapter may be invited which will meet bi -mont` Presently, the proposed site is designated as General industrial. ._- += +•• +: - - -� t ed, subject to the approval of a w� wua iiScS a. c per.......- - -., Conditional Use Permit by the Pianning Commission. ANALYSIS: Prim Issue - Parkin : The major issue related to institutional uses ocate within in ustrial areas is parking availability. Presently, approximately six parking spaces have been assigned to the app'licant's industrial suite, (Exhibit °B") with an additional 174 spaces provided after hours for the institution's use. However, overlaps of industrial and institutional uses may influence and reduce the total number of available parking stalls, ultimately impacting adjacent businesses. Although many of the businesses currently in this center do not have overlapping hours, a commitment of the majority of the spaces within the center to this tenant would cause future problems for other businesses if they choose or desire to expand their hours of operation. ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 83 -13 /Moose Lodge September 14, 1983 Page 2 Previous Institutional Approvals: In general, institutional use within industrial buildings are permitted for a limited period of time, typically two (2) years. In addition, most institutions utilize these structures only on a temporary basis, pending relocation to a permanent site. Lastly, previously approved institutional uses have located in industrial park areas which are required to provide a higher parking ratio, thus reducing the risk caused by overlapping activities. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives sre submitted for Planning Commission review. It is recoumended that the Commission review and consider each alternative to determine the optimum scenario. The Commission may wish to approve the applicant's project subject to the provisions of the chosen alternative and the conditions of approval which appear on the attached Resolution. Alternative 1- o Approve the CUP for a period of two (2) years. o Limit the total number of available parking stalls to one stall per 75 square feet of floor area. o Limit parking to the area surrounding the Moose Lodge industrial suite (20 stalls maximum). Alternative 2• • Approve the CUP on a permanent basis (no time limit). • Limit parking to one stall per 75 square feet of floor area. • Limit parking to the area surrounding the Moose Lodge industrial suite (20 stalls maximum). Alternative 3• o Continue review of the CUP and request the applicant to explore the improvement of the vacant lot to the east of the project site for use as permanent parking. If a permanent parking lot large enough to accommodate the applicant's proposal is provided, the Commission could consider approval as a permanent location. Alternative 4• o Deny the project based upon anticipated parking problems related to overlapping uses. CORRESPONDENCE: A public hearing notice was advertised in The Daily Report newspaper and public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. E 7LANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 83 -13 /M00se Lodge September 14, 1383 Page 3 E RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Fianning Commission review and consider all input and material relative to this project. A Resolution of Approval with Conditions is provided for your consideration. Depending upon the Commission's course of action, modification of the attached Resolution may be necessary. Rent6fu)ly slxnitted, Ar Rick Gnme`t� City RI anner :RG:FD:jr Attachments: El E Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Correspondence Resolution .r -" i T 21 I MIAMI i CITY OF ITEM'[: RANCHO CUCANIONGA TTTLE= L�� (ylaf PLANNING DIVISION EXi imT: A _SG4LE- 11 u C. �7 i 'i :1 CI'T'Y OF R A lNC'-H-o CUCANUNGA PLANNING DiNrb ON TrrL.E: EXHIBIT: SCALE- C V NORTH e by a .• R9 L — 44 :'; °- ;;,,����!,_�11�;_:�� °_ � I{_(!i_lil (i(I1lfillllli�. 600 __ _.. ._:�. -_ . -- ...._... .. _ ,• -. s .��' f....... v •:� i CI'T'Y OF R A lNC'-H-o CUCANUNGA PLANNING DiNrb ON TrrL.E: EXHIBIT: SCALE- C V NORTH e by a R9 L — 44 1y j �i i i I I CI'T'Y OF R A lNC'-H-o CUCANUNGA PLANNING DiNrb ON TrrL.E: EXHIBIT: SCALE- C V NORTH RESOLUTION NO. '::� 3 - 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83 -13 FOR THE LOYAL ORDER. OF MOOSE LOCATED AT 9375 ARCHIBALD AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL AREA (SUBAREA 4) ZONE WHEREAS, on the 17th day of August, 1983, a complete application was filed by the Loyal Order of Moose for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th day Gf September, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the fcliowing findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions appli ^able thereto. will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or ma`_erialiy injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. 'ECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on September 14th, 1983. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 83 -13 is approved subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. This use shall be permitted at this location for two (2) years from the date of approval. 2. Group meetings may occur only on weekends and after 6:00 p.m, on weeknights. s. No institutional activities will be permitted which exceed the available parking or cause adverse effects upon surrounding businesses. Should any prohlems arise, this Conditional Use Permit shall be brought back to the Commission for 'reconsideration. El 11 11 Resolution No. Page 2 4. Public assembly ar other large group meetings shall not occur until such time as all Uniform Building Code and Title 19 of the State Fire Marshall's Regulations have been complied with. 5' comply with all state health and foodservice 6. Any future expansion or intensification of the use shall require a modification of this conditioe.al use permit. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983• PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: . Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary UT MR: r 9191" ng cmmission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning foregoing was of duly nand Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing y the cityloflRanchooCucamonga. at passed, regular meet i 9 of the aPlanningnComnri Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: C"ISSIONERS: 0 11 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 24, 1983 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -16 - HAUSER - The expansion of an existing—p-et—h-ospital nto a contiguous unit located at 8681 19th Street in the C -1 zone - APN 202 - 024 -11. Related File: SA 79 -14 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action. ^Guested: Approval of Conditional Use Permit B. Purpose: Expansion of existing pet hospital C. Location: 8681 19th Street - Southwest Corner 19th and arne ian D. Parcel Size: Not applicable E. Existing Zoning: C -1 F. Existing Land Use: Neighborhood Shopping Center G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Nort - Neig borhoo Shopping Center; C -1 South - Single Family Residential; R -1 East - Neighborhood Shopping Center; C -1 West - Single Family Residential; R -1 H. General Plan Designations. North - Neighborhood Commercial South - Low Density Residential East - Neighborhood Commercial West - Low Density Residential Project Site - Neighborhood Commercial I. Site Characteristics: The site has been fully developed as a neighborhood carumercial shopping center of small retail shops within three separate buildings. \ ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 83 -16 /Hauser September 14, 1983 Page '2 E J. Applicable Regulations: The existing zone allows animal veterinary clinics subject to approval of a Conditionai Use Permit. II. ANALYSIS: A. History: The existing Alta Rancho Pet and Bird Hospital has eeb n in operation since receiving approval in 1979. During the public hearing, a group of surrounding residents expressed concern with the compatibility of the proposed use. However, since the pet hospital began operation, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has not received any complaints from surrounding tenants or residents regarding the hospital operation or violation of the conditions of approval. B. General: The major issue to be considered is compatibility of the proposed use in a neighborhood commercial center that backs up to residential. The primary concerns are noise, odors, disposal, and stray animals. To mitigate these concerns, the applicant proposed detail operating guidelines that were included in the original conditions of approval. Staff would recommend these conditions apply to the expansion to ensure the continued Farmonias operation of the proposed use. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the General Plan and the C- zone. The proposed use, together with the recommended conditions of approval, would not be detrimental to the public health or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The uai y Report newspaper, the property posted and notices were sent to property owmers within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. V. RECOMMEriDA IO ":: it is recoiT��2nu'ed that tfir' Planning Commission cons er a material and input regarding this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding and conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. Res�p"tfu•lly u mitted, Rick Gomez iav City Pjanner RG:DC:jr PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 83 -1E /Hauser September 14, 1983 Page 3 n L' J Attachments, Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "8" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - door Plan Resolution 79 -44 - Original Resolution with Conditions Resolution 79 -44A - Resolution of Approval with Conditions El ALTA RANCHO PET & BIRD HOSPITAL August 12, 1983 To Whom It May Concerns Accompanying this letter is an application for a conditional use permit. This is for expansion of a facility already granted such a use permit, not for a new use. This proposed expansion would be into a directly contiguous empty lease- space, in build- ing 3 of the Magnolia Center, namely the 1000 square feet directly east of the already existing Alta Rancho pet Hospital. The proposed expansion is for the purpose of better accom- odating the patients of the Alta Rancho Pet Hospital. It would consist of a dog run area with approximately 13 block wall runs, 5 feet high, with complete drainage into the sewer system serving the building. Such accomodations would alleviate crowding of dogs into cage space in the existing hospital where only four runs presently exist. Also, there would be a room with cages added to expand cage space area serving the hospital. With expanded cage space, a program of low cost spaying and neutering could be embarked on, with increased volume of patients served, and benefiting the community. A grooming room would be added which would double as a space for vaccinating dogs during vaccination clinic promotions, when dogs and cats are given reduced price vaccinations by an Animal Health Technician employed by the hospital. Access directly from the outside for this purpose wculd alleviate crowding and interference with medical patients during those clinics. There is presently no grooming area in the hospital, and a separate room for this is needed. In addition, a storage room which is badly needed to store goods used in the hospital is planed. Finally, a small retail space in the front of the proposed expansion area would be used -to display specialty items for dogs, cats, and birds, such as feeds, 0 coming accessories, parasite control products and literature. Thus, our clients would be allowed to browse and choose those products and accessories which a veterinarian might recommend. at their own discretion. 867719th Sfta • Aha Loma. Caliiomla 91701 • (714) 980 -3575 C a 11 1i August 12, iyo� Page 2 ALTA CH( PET & BER D HOSPTI'AL It is hoped that these changes would be looked upon by the community and planning commission as merely improvements in ghat we are already doing. We would have much better, completely indoor heated and air conditioned facilities for our wards, and would reduce any impact on the surrounding neighbors due to our use, rather that increase it. Sincerely, Richard T. Hauser, 867719th Street • Aka Loma. Ca4=iia 91701 • (714) 9W -3575 RE: Proposed veterinary clinic in Alta Loma, By Dr. Richard ?causer, 3799 Hidden Farm Road, Alta Loma, Ca. 91701 STAM„ENT OF OPERATING T IDFLIP:BS I. NOISE ACID CDOR PROOFIIQG. These specifications will be incor- porated into a general architectural plan for the facility drawn up by an architect experienced in planing small animal clinics. There will be no animal holding structures at the back wall of the building, nor at any common wall with another use within the main structure, to furthur minimize noise. 2. DEAD ANTII._4L DISPOSAL. All animals which are euthanized (put to sleep or which die will be put into heavy duty impervious cadaver bags and held in a deep freeze. Thev will be regularl•- picked up and hauled off in an unobtrusive ma-Lner by a profes- sional service, through a rear entrance into the clinic. 3. PA.TIENT A`ID CII NT IN * D cr Q GR.�SS A..... P, =.�:, . Dog cat pa tsents will have separate entrances in order to minimize commotion it front of the clinic. These entrances, which will also serve as exits for the resrective species, will be separated by at least 22 feet at their centers. Separate waiting room areas will be maintained to preserve the types of ser_aration of animals and clients within the facility. 4. LENGT OF PY41 - -LkL STAY. This clinic is intended to be operated t in as an outra�ent c ic. Animals will be hcusedin the clinic only so long as is needed to convert them to a status enabling them to be cared for at home. Nc boarding of annals will be permitted; there are ample boarding facilities tc refer peo- Dle to elsewhere. It is expected that the ^---ximum hospitali- zation time for an animal, in rare instances, would to 1 week.. Animals will be treated or an in in the morning and out in the evening basis even if they do need extended carte and suaer= vision. This works out best for the patients and clients as well. S. THCURS of O?il?A ON. Normal business hours will not commence f beore :00 I.E. nor cor_tinue beyond 9:00 p.m. 5. RESPONSIBILITY FOR OPERATIONS. I will eive surrounding mer- chants and neighbors my home ?hone number. Since I live within five minutes access to the proposed clinic site, I will be quickly available to respond to any contingency which might arise when I am not at the clinic. 7. PUBLIC INFOR•t1 TICi� A�iD BDL- CATIUN The clinic will uro.�ide ours for schoolchildren, and many handout materials to inform and educate about animal health and welfoa_re, and the inter- relationships with human health and welfaxe. The clinic also is desznated as a civil defnse first aid station in the event of disaster. I recoznize that such a facility has civic re- sponsibilities beyond servicing the immediate needs of its clientele. Respectfully, LI E ia' i•ia aEE�ic,��a'•- IfiTsiln[ l�llt�[l[� ���� ��� /D�� � /►mil �.�r�Ri�� 7i s�� �� ��i i� �� �.tasaAiata=ti �`�G'�la •si i a� 111li10{1l �. �E�.. 11 \.1� •Y� t t 1. uu //t#glNi Iru�. lull ")�.il�>_ w ./ffff • sr[if {{f�f {!{ft iUllHft tf[u[��nff[ t! ► 1! tll f {If � ii iflM[ffffff[ f! {l � . �j �� tSi/!lfO�i' +� � ►!/[ fftNlfflf/ � '• • iii il[[ � :� �:: fOl�flfllNilfll� . NORTH CITY OF a 1 r t . INC DIVSIO-N EX T� PLANNNI g C1 ASan - E >CRCa✓ �2 THE +iA`AP?0T!�i' RED CARPET > , - T i LIGHT1NGXZU•j+p REALTY Oxn lease -soace h°�'o' GI?".!S. �- No businessess 'Mon -Pr£ *.?oursrTUee -n �� :lours -ida". 4 currently in ao- 8:3 Oa. m. Fri 10, 00a.d1�.� 9.00 a.m. to 7 eration. to 5:30 to 6,00 p.q� 7.00 P.M. ... r P. =- 3at 10,00 a^...,-, to 5300 P.M A Z =� 1 ..�... < •�-- ..__._ elf - --" ->''' _ _i 71 7m. . rp IRTAAicRD YET vcn -?r£ 9,00A 0 . .6.30 P.m. ., I - i ..• Sat 9+00 t0243 Sun_ Closed. M. i, 'I'STA" 5 9Y7 �G3-p 1 -t _ PROPOSES ADDZT10teAL f SPACE for ALTA $lklVf,"i •t - PE T RD.iP'ITki z +� t i .- kf /1 PLORIS 10 200 a.a. to OPEN , -•.1 t .. 6. DOp. ■. Sat "P -• :'.` 77'l J PIONEER CNIC!MSi ua- TIIuralla.m -1g [!f : o •: .1 ::... p.m.a Pri&Sat b N17..00 a.m.to '7142 CDN3 4 AM4!O. q 7f rJ Rours.mon.pri 10.00 -- , a.m. to 9. OOp.a..•.- rrr���� - :iu b• �. 3at9.00a.r to6.00p.a. 1.0 ' ' ja "� \ u'li0 J Sung. 00a.■tc +.00p.m OPEN ;• -� ••`� . + .aI 7 :YC71 YtX Dom. ;� - 3 •'L y L i :O.L��.'�� , 20 hours �� I C J 8677 19th. Access 8679 Access8681 ._.. : - .. PROPOSED ADDITIONAL.. SPACE. - :small retail - display . _ ..... -- .......... - ---sea. or I .. Proposed door through iv.wall Groomingi - - - - vaccina -1 tion cliz EXISTING ANIMAL HOSPITAL storage animal ALTA RANCHO PET & BIRD HOSPITAL room room - -- .(presntly have two bathrooms including 1 handicapped in 54ft. i` onti reception area) .dog run; area .. . .. -: Proposed D or through dividing 1 CITE' OF ITEM - RA1CH0 CUCAN'IO1NGN TITLE= PLkNN, 1i\G Dl %rlSnN EXFi1B1T =__:_Ck_ mil£= RESOLUTION NO. 79 -44 A RESOLUTION CF- THE-RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING SITE APPROVAL NO. 79 -14 FOR A SMALL ANIMAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL TO RE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN WITHIN THE C -1 ZONE WHEREAS, on May 24, 1979, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above described project; and WHEREAS, on June 13, 1979, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above described project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COIHNSSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the site is adequate in size and shape. 2. That the site has adequate access. 3. That the proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property. 4. That the proposed use is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 5. That the conditions listed in this report are necessary to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare. SECTION 2: That Site Approval No. 79 -14 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Interior modifications to the leasable unit shall include the latest state of the art regarding noise and odor proofing such that no noise or odor will be detectable from, the operation of the use including doors, walls, ceiling, etc. 2. Dead animals shall be put in heavy duty inperviou s cadaver bags and held in deep freeze and picked up on a weekly basis. All dead animals shall he kept inside the structure. 3. There shall be no outside keeping of animals at ^ any t ime. i - i to` 4. There shall be no boarding of animals. I11- or injured animals may not be Kept more than seven (7) days. 5, hours of operation shall be 8 a.m. to 9 p.n:. 6. The Planning Commission may review this approval at any time that there appears that the conditions of approval are not being met. 7. Care of animals shall only inc�ude small animals such as dogs, cats, etc. No care of equine or bovine or the like shall be allowed. 8. The use shall be approved within building "B" as proposed; however, that the leasee be encoura7,ed to locate his use at the west end of the building. APPROVED AMID ADOYIED THIS 137h DAY .^.z JUtQE, 1979. PLANNING COMMISSION OF IuS rITY OF RANCEC CUCAMONCA BY: Secretary ion I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City s of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commis- sion held on the 13th day of June, 1979, by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GARCIA, REMPEL, JONES IDES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DALL RESOLUTION NO. 79-44 A A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83 -16 FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING ANIMAL HOSPITAL LOCATED AT 8681 19TH STREET IN THE C -1 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 17th day of August, 1983, a complete application was filed by Dr. Richard Hauser for review of the above - described project; and WHE ?EAS, on the 14th day cf September, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public `searing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissior resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, an.+ the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued on September 14, 1983. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 83 -16 is approved subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. All of the original conditions of approval, as listed in Resolution 79 -44, shall apply. 2. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zonir,; Ordnance and all other applicable city ordinances in effect at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is granted. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Resolution No. Page 2 BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: I Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ca Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was dull and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 2 11 11 Cr1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1983 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreck -mar., Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIF.UNMtnIAL A33r-33mCni ru,u --- H N .R' HRI HUR H - e eve opment of a ebuu sq. r��ationa :,.c7 ity or the Alta Loma Brethren i Christ Church on 6.8 acres of land in the R -1 -8500 zone located at 9974 19th Street - APN 202 - 171 -01. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uested: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the above- described project. B. Purpose: To create an educational building addition to the existing church complex. C. Location: 9974 19th Street D. Parcel Size: 6.8 acres E. Existing Zoning: R -1 -8500 F. Existing Land Use: Church G. Surroundin Land Use and Zonin ors.. - scant arce zone R -1 -8500 J � t ,7�nn South - Single Family Residences, zoneu ^-�-•� -- East - vacant Parcel, zoned R -3 /PD West - vacant Parcel, zoned R -1 -8500 H. General Plan Designations: ' �n A�1 /� 1 �r;,scc; ,;te ?fie :tn iensity Residential .4' -14 c. North - Medium Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac) South - Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Medium Density Residential (4-14 du /ac) West - Medium Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac) ITEM J PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Conditional Use Permit 83 -09 September 14, 198" Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: Currently, the site contains an existing annex, multi-purpose building, and parking area. The parcel gently slopes in a southerly direction at approximately a four percent slope. Flora consists of indigenous plant materials in addition to Eucalyptus windrows which border the parcel. Curbs, gutters, and sidewalks have been provided along 19th Street. II. ANALYS:S• A. General: The proposed 2300 sq. ft. educational facility is es � gred as part of a church complex which includes an existing 5800 sq. ft. multi- purpose (worship, daycare) facility, and an existing structure which serves as a temporary office building (Exhibit "A "). Presently, the existing multi - prupose facility is designed to accommodate 96 preschoolers for day care usage, and 260 seats have been provided for church related activities. The new classroom structure is designed to function as a private elementary school for 100 students from kindergarten through 3rd grade. The existing church structure v:ill continue to be used for a preschool for a maximum of 96 children (ages 2 1/2 to 5). Parking standards require approximately 50 stalls for preschool and elementary activities, including necessary personnel. Presently 74 stalls are provided on -- a for church related activities. Exhibit "A" reflects the existing site plan with the proposed structure and the master plan. Under the original approval granted by the Commission, the existing structure adjacent to the multi - purpose building was approved to be maintained fob a limited period of time. According to the existing conditions of approval, that structure will have to be removed by March 9, 1984. The structure has been painted and reroofed to match the multi- purpose building. It has caused no problems over the last few years. The church still considers the structure temporary as indicated on the master plan. Therefore, staff recommends that a new condition be added to replace the condition which required the removal of the existing strucure by March 9, 1984. We suggest that this approval require the removal of the existing structure prior to occupancy and final approval of the sanctuary, which is planned as the next phase. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee was generally easT d with the architecture of the proposed addition, stating that the design is in substantial conformance with the existing multi - purpose structure. is PLANNING COKAISSION AGENDA Conditional Use Permit 83 -09 September 14, 1983 Page 3 11 C. Develoxnent Review Committee: The Development Review Committee was concerne with the type o{ activities, hours of operation, number of students and supervisors, and ages of students /preschoolers, related to the proposed addition. A letter addressing the items of concern listed above has been provided by the applicant (Exhibit "D "). The letter appears to address all major concerns and no operational problems are anticipated related to school activities. In addition, the Development Review Committee was concerned that the snared reciprocal access drive approach (westerly driveway), which is only partially finished, be completes to City standards. D. Grading Committee The Grading Committee has granted conceptual —grading approval for the above - described project. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff tias completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental inpacts related to the construction of the project and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based upon review of the site and information provided by the applicant, the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan. and Zoning Ordinance provisions. The proposed building, existing playground, and parking area are designed to adequately service all existing and proposed uses. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Dal v Report newspaper and notices were sent to property owners within 399 feet of the subject property. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a rubfic hearing and receive all public input on this matter. If after such consideration the Commission can support the findings and conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. Re sp F ctf 1��.- itted, � r Rick Gomez City elanner RG:FD:jr I PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Conditional Use Permit 83 -09 September 14, 1983 Paga 4 Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Eloor Plan Exhibit "Cu - Elevations Exhibit "C" - Correspondence Resolution 11 ILI PHASE IV PHASE G PHASE i 4 i i +M �O +•�c�f �Oa��, I i � � a r O a s a a + j a — —f T�ZbX sz-� - -- s 28a lS+ • c'J4 — 2C1:pT 2 TD!L_ P�MS N 12'. £ ?o ?A = 244$ PHASE i 4 i i +M �O +•�c�f �Oa��, I i � � a r O a s a a + j a — —f T�ZbX sz-� - -- `5 n v v s m O N O £ x O fl i'4 > c m `5 n v v t E=TTNG CITY OF RAINCHO CUCALTMONGA PLAiNNNU D ViS'ION I C m m a x z fl i 1 t' G) i�l E i I� �I leJ i FT%,1 V. z: a cc m x o�� £ x O fl i'4 o n r t E=TTNG CITY OF RAINCHO CUCALTMONGA PLAiNNNU D ViS'ION I C m m a x z fl i 1 t' G) i�l E i I� �I leJ i FT%,1 V. z: PARKING ,J YTG:.Y= EXtiYBYT= s SCALE= �1 + i £ Z m x m m Wirt < o p C I { f ova r Ml-"SEW j PARKING ,J YTG:.Y= EXtiYBYT= s SCALE= �1 + i 0 40 Ll ps" LOV LAN DSCAPIN6 NORTH CITY OI R.-\,\C: -1O CLCNNIONGA T r: lY1 _�•'I' `-1�- f'-a�� - PL.- 1 \\I \G DIN'LIZIO\ SGALL- Llr -- S Y 0 0 C 0 Z Q M� ECSTUM watt sma.o • i S� CITY OF rrF\t: RA\'CHO CUCAIVIONGA -nTLE: t 6" PLA.N�tLNr-, DIVISION EXHiBrr= scAL.E-- NORTH f r a l.' s �tF _ i I • i S� CITY OF rrF\t: RA\'CHO CUCAIVIONGA -nTLE: t 6" PLA.N�tLNr-, DIVISION EXHiBrr= scAL.E-- NORTH E .a7TN QL[VATM MST L[YRTMM CITY OF RANNU 0 CUCANION7GA PL AN�TINC DIVLSIQN rrF:NI: EXH!BIT: L SCALE: r. u L AN CITY OF RAING-D CUCAMONGA NBC! =-VA?= i? AI: TITLE- _�"�' EXHIBIT. SCALE_ V NORTH ALTA LOMA BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH 9974 15th Street — P.O. Box 485 Alta Loma. California 91701 Rev. J. Ralph Wenger Pas.or September 2, 1983 To: the City of Rancho Cucamonga Re: Request by Design and Development Review Committee for CUP 83 -09 Gentlemen: Telephone (714) 989 -3110 in response to your letter of August 24, 1983 requesting additional information concerning activities and operations at this site, the following outline pictures rather accurately the present program and the additional activities which are anticipated in the expanded projection. Monday through Friday 6:30 a.m. - 8:30 a.m. ::: Supervised care both indoors and in the enclosed playground 8:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. ::: Classroom instruction with staggered recess tLaes using the enclosed playground 11:30 a,m. - 12:30 p.m. ::: lunchtime - supervised 12 :30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. Naptime - no outside a '1vity 200 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Classroom instruction with staggered recess times 4:30 porn. - 6 :00 p.m. ::: Supervised care There are 96 children enrolled in this program. They are from 2: years old to 5 years old. There are apgrmcihnately 20 cars in the parking lot at any one time in the course of a day. The Preschool and kindergarten age children are %nider constant supervision at the ratio of 12:13 Exaanded Prejected Program: rdhen the projected building is completed and filled, there will be approximately 100 addi_tioaal children ages 5 -8 involved, i"he older childrens• program will be similar to the other group. Monday through Friday 6:30 a.m. - 8:30 a.m. ::: Supervised care 8:30 a.m. - 12 :00 a.m. Regular elementary classroom activity for gr =.des kindergarten through grade three 12:00 a.m. - 12 :45 p.m. :.: lunch period - supervised 12:45 p.a. - 3:00 p.m. :.: Regular classroom activity 3:00 p.m. - 6 :00 p.m. :.: Supervised care for the few whose parents are not home from work. Some recess and playground activities will not be restricted to the encic3ed play- ground, but will be closely supervised. ,e estimate that the expanded r -ogram will increase the parking activity from 20 to 30 cars at any one time. `And my God will provide you needs according to His riches in glory by Christ Jesus." — Philippic 4:19 — RE2 Request by Design and Development Review Cccs^_ittee for CU"P 83 -09 Page Two ucational codes require that the supervision ratio for the older children be 25:1. Y hope this information is clear and that it answers your questions concerning our expectations for a service to this com==ity, if you have further questions, please contact use Sincerely, Gordon D• Engle, Associate Minister Alta Loaa brethren in Christ GDE /eh cc: Jack Fielding Cogun industries K- 7 11 Church RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANC40 CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83 -09 FOR ALTA LOMA BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH LOCATED AT 9974 19Th STREET IN THE R -1 -8500 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 8th day of duly, 1983, a complete application was filed by Alta Loma Brethren in Christ Church for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th dcy of September, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use vill comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on September 14, 1983. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 83 -09 is approved subject to the o ;owing conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. All laws and regulations of the State of California relating to licensing of elementary school facilities shall be complied with prior to opening of the school. 2. If the operation of this school causes adverse effects upon adjacent properties, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for their consideration and possible termination of such uses. 11 Resolution No. Page 2 3. Operation of the school shall not commence until such time as all !Uniform Building 5de and Title 19 of the State Fire Marshall's Regulations have been complied with. Plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. 4. Expansion of the preschool /gradeschool beyond 200 students will require the approval of a modified conditional use rermit. 5. Precise design and site plan review will be required for all proposed future phase +. 6. The existing annex building shall be removed prior to issuance of occupancy permits, and final approval of the main sanctuary (Phase 3). 7. Conditional use Permit approval is granted for a period of eighteen (18) months. Approvai shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued wit'-in eighteen ® (18) months from the date of approval. 8. The site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 9. All s'te plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigscion plans, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of building permits, prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable community plans or specific plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 11. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of tre City Planner. 11 12. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. Details shall be included in building plans. 13. All ground mountr.d utility appurtenants such as transformers shalt be located out of public view of the main building area and adequately screened through the -ise or combination of concrete ar masonry walls, berming, and landscaping. 14. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 20 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foc.hill Fire District rc-quirements. 15. Prior to combustibl submitted temporary available, protection issuance or Building e construction, eviden to the Foothill Fire water supply for fire pending completion of systems. Permits for ce shall be District that protection is required fire 16. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances and regulations 'n effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. 17. Prior to issuance of building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an exsiting development, the applicant shall pay development fees at th established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 13. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformanc? with the approved conceptua' arading plan. E 0 KEzOIUI.'LA 14V- Page 4 E ENGINEERING DIVISION 19. The westerly drive approach shall be completed to current city standards. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was du,y and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Conriission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1-1 W 12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1983 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: ^ick Gomez, City Planner 3Y: Pan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT FEIVE'W 83 -21 - SINES - Deve opment of 4 apartment units on 19.14 acres of 'land in the R -3 zone located at the southwest corner of Foothill and Hellman - APN 208- 241 -25, 26. Z. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action, Requested: Approval of site plan and elevations B. Purpose:_ Development of 384 apartment units C. Location: Southwest corner of Foothill and Heilman (Exhibit ,-An) D. Parcel Size: 19.14 acres E. Existing Zoning: R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) F. Existing Lard Use: Vacant G. Project Density: 20 du /ac H. Surrounding Land Use and Zanin : Nort - Comercia Vacant; -2 South - Single Family Tract; R -1 East - Vacant; C -2 West - Preschool & Vacant; R -1 and R -3 I. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium High Residential (14 -24 dulac) North - Commercial South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Commercial West - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) ITEM K September 14, 1983 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: Site slopes southerly at approximately a grade, covered with native grasses, no existing trees, only existing structure is a block wall around perimeter. K. Applicable Regulations: R -3 zone permits apartment; 1.5 ping spaces per Z -u aroom unit and 1.3 spaces per I- bedroom unit. 11. ANALYSIS: A. General: Thi*i is the J to of a previously approved 398 unit con -dominium project, TT 11459 by Prime Builders. The concerns expressed by the Planning Z3- mmission and surrounding residents during the public hearings on the previous project have been incorporated into the new project design.: buildings were lowered from 3 -story to 2 -story and pulled back 80 feet to 90 feet from existing single family residences on the south. Three large open space areas have been created by placing units along Foothill and Hellman to reduce traffic noise on the project interior. The main project entrance will be on Foothill Boulevard directly across from Lion Street. A secondary access point will be provided at the southeast corner of the project on Hellman Avenue. The City will be widening Hellman Avenue on both sides and improving the drainage structures. A traffic signal is scheduled to be installed at the intersection in 1984. The existing asphalt ditch on the south side of Foothill will be replaced with storm drain pipes. At the request of residents, grade differences between this pro;;ect and the tract to the south have been kept at a minimum by reducing the amount of fill (Exhibit "K "). However, to drain the project to Mellman will necessitate a 4 -foot to 5 -foot concrete "V" gutter which will reduce the landscape planter width from 10 feet to 5 to 6 feet. This is sufficient width to acccmodate dense landscaping recommended by the Design Review Committee. B. Desian Review Committee: The Committee recommended approval subject to the o owing revisions: Revise elevations to incorporate hip roof on ends of eac, building and use tile roof material. Provide 10 feet of dense landscape buffering along south and west boundary. 0 PLANNTNG COMMISSICN STAFF REPORT Development Review 83- 21 /Sickels September 14, 1983 Page 3 E o Revise administration and laundry building elevations to reflect_ consistent theme of project. o Pull buildings away from existing single family residences. o Provide additional active open space /recreation areas and enclosed tot lot. o Provide additional landscape treatment within parking areas and at the end of the cul -de -sacs for Eastwr.d and Castro. The applicant has incorporated these chan,s into the project as sho,-n in the attaches exhibits. C. Environmental Assess-lent: Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant, is attached for your review. based �a nitia; Study, staff "r has upon completion of -:art Ii of th I found that no significant adverse impacts will occur as a result of this project. I!I. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Ge erai Plan an will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and building desigt,, together with the recommended conditions, are in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and City standards. Iv. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing an The Dai y Raoort newspaper and the property posted. Notices were sent to property owners within 3300 feet of the project site. In addition, the applicant end staff have :net twice with surrounding residents to receive their input. The residents identified three areas of concern that are reflected in the attached conditions of approval- * Minimize and grade difference along south boundary (Condition Provide adequate fence /wall along south boundary for privacy and security ( Conditior 2). z) Minimize drainage onto Castro and Eastwood Avenues to the south (Condition 14). The applicant has revised the conceptual grading plan, Exhibits °E° and °K", to address the homeowner's concerns. One of the neighborhood residents -xpressed concern that apartments are not an appropriate land use for this site, and that the project would impact the schools. E PLANw"iG COFIMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review 83- 21 /Sickeis September 14, 1983 Page 4 Y. P.ECOMME "'?ATIGN: It is recommended that the Planning Commission cons r al] material and elements of this project. I` after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding and conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. ly submitted, 2 2 0 Rick tomez 7 Gity "Planner RG:DC:jr R Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map FX!..Hir ■s" - Natural Features Man Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Elevations Exhibit "G= - Elevations Exhibit "H" - Floor Plans Exhibit "I" - Streetscape Exhibit "J" - Line of Sight Sections Exhibit "K" - Section Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with C-�nditi.ns 2 2 0 . .. , 'ate ,, :. ;... it ., r r ��..� r ���.:� �a n •. - H11d1H " 1 I" wou g mn Ru' pt .wool " une . .. , �..., ,, :. ;... it ., r r ��..� r ���.:� �a n •. - it t r t> 1 •-� i � �;. fir`. r _ _ E I rum S 3 L 7 RIB t% c it S 3 L -}1 � 3E i4 =4 -will_ - FiF[ 7 RIB t% c it S 3 L � st_J 04� t � 1 s t� RIB t% c it I .AOW • •. n ti J'c:•t l r '! � M! ' _�:- ., RQSNIMT U�Aupl i IA SP;&�; - f tf� w F� %- ' r 5 �►G_ rf��Yf � � ICE , 1 >•i Y;�"�.- ...:. f�aTaa � ;sa�E+.ata= te�A -�saoV 4? • , �,,. . 'I _ •. - •�vl 1 rl �• �r4 r rl 1 w JIA/ "e# e �t o ywmf�,� • m� m• �w yr qr� T, t M NCO- MIL ,.jl , „.• VE IN r� -e-•- � ,C M. t���•. rw r _.. y� v i wa r; f III 1. .rZ r y� ,f: � 7• "� 'C�' : Y� � '� r 13'� . i r s� - 4 . ,r' MIN �1 tJ K IL '7�j � -�e I IF L I� I�d %aoo i gl WI wil J � QI S�I CE T II III i , o!I Col. 11 0 S 0 8 o Q 0 6 S ° I O 1 i IIII` i iI I ( , .I ,I ;I 11 0 ;gyp Zia it N. NORTH CITY OF RANCHO • • i Ti i tl. _ _ a M ai,'r,i s i' R l.ft �� 4 r w M CITY OF RANCH(` CUCAMONGA 1NTTIAL STUDY pp r�T I - PROJECT INFORMATi _)N SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental, review, this foam must be completed and sub-":itted to the Development Review Co:unittee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial St:dy. The DevelOpment Review action later an ten committee will meet and take at which time the (10) days before the public meeting of project is to be heard. The Comm. -L will have noesisni- three determinations: 1.) The project Declaration ficant environmental impact andW Negati a significant will be filed, 2) The project iMpact aid additicnaitinforrm.ation report _ will be prep further inior7M=- saould be stPplied by ;:he appl .cant: giving tion concerning the proposed project. L1 PP_OJECT TITLE: Vita Lg `7er _�_ ---- -- APPLICAN_.'S NAME-, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Associates. 16390 Pacific Coast Hwv NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING T`_iIS PROJECT:'iam *St�A ?52049 213 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STRE,?.T ADDRESS F,ND ASSESSOR hellria Ave PARCEL NO Southwest corner of Foothill Bo�u�kv20Q _PG. 241 , Parc is 25 & 26_ Assessors Parcel Information LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAT_ AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS' Buildinq Permit and Cal Trans Access to Foothill I --1 E A ti PROJECT DESCRIPTION _ . w F nP U'li t5 aYTSin aP 171 i6 tW0- riccr72TPTION OF PROJECr.T — _ ,� _ ',P nr.an and— story �. -- reczeat;on ACPEAGE OF PROJECT &REA A37D.SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXZS^_IPIG AI6B o npgED BUILDIiGS, IF ANY. 19 l4 No exiscina b 1dT nay' DESCRIBE THE =E PLANTS SET�_r' —OFP THE (TRF ES) , INCLUDING II3FOFL''ATION ON HZSTORICAL OR SC£NIC ASPECTS, USE ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, c SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. AND THE DES:RIPTION OF ANY ^XISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE !ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) Zs the project part of a larger project, one- of a series of cumulative actions, which although indiviuim act'. may as a whole have significant enviranmental imp No. 1-2 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for -- ;municipal services (police, fire, water, sewave, etc.) ? X 4. Create charges in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many ?_._ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flasables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: - - -- IMPORTANT: if the project involves the constructior of residential units, complete t'-41C form on the next page. 11 CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of rty knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date 7 /7/83 Signa Title 0 1-3 C RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION e following information should be provided to the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate rye proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Sickels StariDlev and Associates Specific Location of Project:Soutl^ west corner of Foothill Blvd and Hellman Ave_ PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PF-ASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of maltipie family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: �Earliest date of occupancy: Model n and s of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range 0 0 0 192 192 0 2 N/A 40 40 80 80 I -4 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. f ? -1I A RESOLUTION OF THE RAHC40 C4CAMONGA PLANNING COv1MISSION - APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 83 -21 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL & HELLMAN IN THE R -3 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 15th day of July, 1983, a tomplete application was filed by Sickels, Stampley & Associates for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th day of September, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above- described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1.: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the appiicable provisions of the Zonino Ordinance; and 4. That `he proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on September 14th, 1983. SECTION 3: That development Review No. 83 -21 is approved, subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The final grading plan shall be in substantial confom. ante with the approved conceptual grading plan and minimize the grade difference along the south boundary to a maximum of two (2) feet. 11 11 Resolution No. Page 2 2. A block wall no higher than 8 feet at its hig•ZC�i mint shall be constructed along the southerly property line. Developer shall be responsible to notify by mail all contiguous property owners along the southerly boundary at least thirty (80) d3YS prior to removal of the exisi:ing walls and fences of the anticipated removal date. 3. Dense landscaping, including minimum 15- gallon size trees and a continuous hedgerow of thorny shrubs shall be planted along the south and west_ boundary. 4. Additional landscaping, including minimum 15- gallon trees shall be planted between carports in the parking areas. 5. Storage areas shall be provided for each unit either on the floorpian or in the carports. 6. Details of the carports, gazebo and laundry building shall be included in the construction plans. 7. Details of the enclosed tot lot area(s) shall be included in the landscape plans. 8. Street trees, a minimum of 15- gallon size, shall be planted at the end of the cul -de -sac: Eastwood and Castro; details shall be included in the landscape plans. 9. A revised site plan shall be submitted indicating 9' x 19' parking spaces with a maximum i' overhang. Compact spaces shall be 8' x 16' with no overhang allowed. ENGINEERING DIVISION 10. Existing 24 inch CMP shall remain in service as is or relocated to continue uninterrupted flows. 11. Existing asphalt di *:h along Foothill shall be removed and replaced by storm drain pipes which will daylight onto Hellman to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 12. Reimbursement to the City will be required to cover the costs of widening Hellman and modification of drainage structures. Responsibility will be to the ® centerline of Foothill. Costs shall include a fair share of design and construction. Resolution No. Page 3 13. A merger shall be required to combine Assessors Parcel Nc,. 208- 241 -25 & 26 into a single lot. 14. Project shall be graded to drain to Heilman and m aimize drainage onto Castro and Eastwood Avenues. No nuisance water shall drain onto streets to the south. APPROVED ANO ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Denn s !. Stout, hairman ATTEST: Secretary of the annino Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resoiution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONS "5: E C � q D N• e-'. o c tl e`^ � m 4 V O �• 6 N O C L c c S•w a. C Oc PO �, c?• =t - O a O be < C � N � c a 6 p0>, y �V A V N O � V O V C °O V V O oe�' V > O � O T 4 ✓ q✓� O V� C L O V V 0. VL 4 � C D q v iDCc ra,c L u W d L ✓ Dn _ v C d� 69 Q � 9 O•Y' V � N M �L� N N C •O q dVN� Y r V c� ✓o O Y �°• O N L n^ N q Ldp o s o y i ^Lp°^ z O i 0 i yT O r 6 O 2 0 0 V G H s � u W ca 6y N A L° A O O C ° Y A i i -- J L u zg S C ^ 0 6_ O V y J <V N N •• g - h 9 — O ✓ 4 _ S O, ✓ C q q O Z°• i w c ^ y O E 8 W P C C y R ^ r° N < a na O P y, C S� d 00 'G V � C u L L p y V N O O ✓ c A N O L9 w 6 d J pM A L Y ° L > - w✓it Ya V 9 j L � d L L V � C w7 4 4 O A � vO N r L v � d o ✓ O V L o' m 0 0 � C v y W ° O Y �Lc o m 6Y uE° ^ 6t T P -P � c V C ^ — r 4- d f G CyEE W N O d- Y�Y cyE � GP A c N O C t O > C q N L ILO6 � A V41\ I °s 'p9 L ✓' W = L u cY a O t 6 V y e Z m { V > L e ` O O � ^ L c V y ° > g -= e_n ^ w u T P O� G •°r V b O o a q= vN✓ T � D o_ C N r a 4 0 aaq ^ Py C S ✓ Q✓� a� y O N ` � d a >^ L A V^w osc O A A Z O U J w T W G V M 4 G LEpo A P 9 > pL. L M O e a � O V A O✓ r ° A 4 L p L > 0.� 4 A N L N� •r �N pV c P °�q O V ^6 P _ C q d � >or� ° V q •O Y � O day G e V � C T o � a I`C6 O O u NI 1 49 N i c — A � avG'w- O O C ypA C q y O Y 6 d c q N m DV �!g `�40L ° > L V 9 C a ^ N A` L A � � ~ C 6 �W YNc l �_ L = V r O,L C ✓ q CO d V c O C^ w 9Q •T9� -9 —,G N ✓AOc v °� _ n° 'O E iavd u V C W v C D O N F_ v6 H d °�y°✓ YZ rf CW r 6 A OCT9 C` V�I� C^ W9 Qq QNO d9^ -C Vy P9 >U l 01� L � C l C •Lf G q 444 a O.`Yh qL _ L C Y C y L L q^ G N e p � d .^ 6 9 <C C O ^ C •t O W q ^ ^! P d•OL Lll ` � f � C q� 6 V N C v c V A 6 Y L_ O L v Y C Z � O ° ,Le w 9 9 V q q C O L � v > 60 O P i L v is a 6 N L• N OI i 0 �! y 9 •� T w a A C L O. e ° q o E �Zn r O P G L� L� ✓ F O A a ^v. m Y ° ✓ 4 sae ^ m- 3 a ya ^ sL y N� ^n Ac qoo G� e n ,cc O C > C O O[ V r O C m L cYN 'L'um V m pTL Ob^ V 9 w > C 0 PC p e�•Et '�^ M w� O 9OY L ° L n uOe^ m� -a uo 4� P`E N L y - q PY� Lv .. a E P °.LO O,✓n Y L m� V OF n N L r •t N V T C c P A µV✓ y 4 t ' �O + O syu V -� cum -ac �= c V 0 G A p Z L - C� V O r q ° O L Y � A V PC�N �v^ N c- _ O ELEY O 6 u ON VO q 9 C y 60 0 ' ~ d O d d P S G A G V w i y= rr y •C• _acP O Pon p U VNO O= y C n L DOON M g pen o _ _ �V t o,eA Lt'`O' T' CO` 6Cw.• 0 7 S N I1 ¢ S Orin YV° L yLa ! A� P« 4 S nu �da•w N O V w.-• p r°o �_ Y p u V oy N�vcNEY S a F r M C A V A N G nr =_ •Vn U O� O�� N q V `D Pn ^" °a v LVV OCSY�� Vn NSA ° •� aoo V D OaL °- 'p nVY V NV VSO •..N V d E A r¢ c V 0 6 � E E O�� e/r y O q 6 6 6 a d/^ N ^ a L n = n. L C PY V•� 6S y � ^ 9 d S Yj N� L Y C= DNa y. T«�V C ^OCN� AD�V•`Fa ^sn V= v dGN a S G n C N a/D �i �r coy rc -v oQ V E-s• . ¢PL.S rAG .°.gin ' A ey�i oNd i:: N ^ o Q ` Aa N S Q c o c s s� v ao� °/ten n �A qir n .Ne N ` V « S ° L M_ A� ¢ 'n r VL N° L NL 6 ('i .'• d N'- OV u �e �T d N4 y ViVr Cam° 55 J� 3 V OLVL Lr brp° d . � L V ���r r L OL G D V `I L .a .nn o-,--v -�aaL/ O A V O D `y. JI� = AOCE S ib y \O✓.Til�VA S - p N wn } y S� O� O 9 O N W O S �! A �✓ d OcV� M 2 r 6 V A 6 y 1 '^ N T 6 C n 6 �• « V n N Y G�TY. ° � O O C • N N � ` S Y q C C V L o ' O d •r V U�nLq ^O� _acP O Pon p° C n L DOON A� � A • C Lt'`O' T' CO` 6Cw.• 0 7 S N G o n L yLa ! r P« SOPi•`V Lrr. A�O'AN ^i �da•w N ° r°o �_ Y ° Gqr oy N�vcNEY S a w `s nr «V N V `D Pn V LVV OCSY�� Vn NSA V D OaL °- 'p nVY V NV VSO •..N V N 0 6 � E E O�� e/r y O q 6 6 6 a d/^ N ^ a L n = n. L C PY V•� 6S y � ^ 9 d S Yj N� L Y C= DNa y. T«�V C ^OCN� .nor OT LL_QL SV dGN a N v« as ° a/D Cr9 L V •'^ 4 =��>• .°.gin ' G O ey�i ¢r ^ o Q A l d V G d P N S Q c o c s s� v ao� °/ten n �A qir n .Ne V V y V « S ° L M_ 'n r VL N° L NL 6 ('i .'• d N'- OV u �e �T d N4 y ViVr Cam° .5.5- ow ¢ V brp° _> NFY a.y . � L V r L OL 6 N= A D V `I Ni D JI� o W Cy�V O d V C ^O� ns a VPC ZVL ✓�6 pPY l DOON g uV G o n ✓ ! r C. SOPi•`V Lrr. A�O'AN ^i �da•w ^ ° r°o �_ u ° Gqr oy N�vcNEY `s nr «V N V `D Pn V LVV OCSY�� Vn NSA V D OaL °- 'p nVY V NV VSO •..N V N 0 6 � E E O�� e/r �.0 AO ° d/^ °AF �.P..�r w/ °•w 0. ^ 9 ✓a/ u q DNa y. T«�V C ^OCN� .nor OT LL_QL SV Cr9 L =��>• C r V ey�i W S Q9.M� `LV' LC>• EEN V«NY V V y V « S ° L M_ 'n r VL N° L NL 6 ('i .'• d N�q CLN OV u d N4 y L ^p/ Cam° y.`Op VyGr D . � L V 6 N= A D V ¢ b C D AOCE S ib \O✓.Til�VA S - N r 9�ro.• � r OcV� 1V•r Vtd Gdrr OG N `V P V n Y G�TY. ° � NC jN�VS Y• O N � ` S Y q C C V L o Y y e VO. C G N T CV N V V V °�•c SyCL _ V V E M EO�`r ^L ¢ = C _ T � p S N ¢ d 6 E S N A A V L V A ° P V OCS N.L+ C�.nO °r N V = ^O^ E ¢L w• 2 dJ P n c O V AL °Y °� LF OC a•I'y/AV r C t C O ¢� V d C ry O C O O O q 9 C V T d« D 9 S O l y¢ S u /n O n • c E o O G y° n ^° C D 9 P nu nr IGP G u O L D V L C •r ¢ r O SL d � r p � N° L � y 9 V A 9 V j V G O. V O d �Ey d V'- 'n` Oy O ^ p y V VC N T uCC446N ¢G J'•• VyO.r�� '• rL > fl dSO .N OL CY TD � dA4 q IO OVU MP O w...0>N `° S A CgrCW � J 1S .C] r -^ �G 6E ¢ L60 ¢G 6.r tw ANLU� QCrQ i1 N 6•` 2 Yr _ '�I �i Nl �I �i 01 � • I � �} � E N t 0 V� ANIL 6 C1 .i 0 C L S s t W 6 6 O s r P M d G rn t V r i q I O O ! ! O O o.c 6 6 6 ! •nI N� L z b e ° V 0 oN OC a ,ce N L V 9 L O T d O Q w i T� u ^ C ^ NI w� `a �I W L O G i c N J c s c c i N n o c GJV ✓ d( CA �y�C L J o N > V O J p O VL G r L •JI C •- e .9C Naoc o.a o >o a _ V ° 00 O J L Y 7 d w J N�•1 SLY N N L O SJ4 V UV-IL U ^d� NT ��L u0� O i� C y o` • N�W rVyq, `. QL QoVd w0y GOQ^ qO ^K yQ W E i o d J it r e .L- o• •L• L C r «ems Kam O O 4 O 0 C L S s t W 6 6 O s r P M d G rn t V r i q I O O ! ! O O o.c 6 6 6 ! •nI N� L z b e ° V 0 oN OC a ,ce N L V 9 L O T d O Q w i T� u ^ C ^ NI w� `a �I W L O ! G J C 7 d b O G .Le rO � C ro m tl A O L V V wN J \K1m1 6 1 1 L O V� I 4�rrl wi V •di CL wV P ^L C^ C�•� J V �TC L O A O C O _ O g w G G V C .L• r � A! ' 6' ! L � r N K NdA4 ` r rVgrJ� y ^`p 9 A OJO L 6 V P g V H N • C _j 1 C C J V � Q• V � C • u O V N wai V q V U y d N Q p C Y G a O V 4 V! M PS • O r� Q d t V ^ a O C T t O r � Q L y � C ! D r N O i_ A V 9 P d 9 N O L V r°+ J b = O• j p q w^ V r •'. N� C y C = l P 9` 7 Y L N L ^ L7 �� � V Y a y M Y C �E VlO YN � O G V r q OQ r = w O O V C C >� C •re !_ r r_ A= q A w ^ G� C O V Y �9 j1 idL q Vf�G L1 >.J q 6LC Y G.4 w O oL� OP.Oi� L PJVV O V�� Q tiq A LI p�J yTl L Er V VNA^ wV °V q A V VCOOVC •'�V.r'1rJ rA !V aVL NLC aLi"° q L N �q•�r ,"„mow ` aq jaaq cr Oi2 E. Z! _Lq l...� .a.. y er c g,"'r LN ¢ w_ ` .-O..0 J c V C V G i � .L.• ` a� V q V E A C N r CCV NW 6> w•^ O Nom. VC qLY_ C C .Lid N N g L N'J V N EZ u V! ` r6. o �LV wq L4 �IJ G�� o wJ ey aL a a ° ��ae V` Hfaw V `q q` J O r rnrS Lyy wA r CCJV L O N C d p^ � n q L� W V O a • V O N E� y w C q. S O � N N V O Q^ V N A r Q• r �`> S� 9 V T ° fi r C �L a L A yd T n i C i q 29 iOC2� eJ L -,.99 d L! T q C T^ N N V C O G b C V V.• �N Cr w ONO OJ w O C!O =YV � q pVLV aJV ` EVw ^_uLVV rLr V.La ^C O N iU�. �J ^ CL CO c d do .aib _ q�� c N ^M9N KN f.a LN iNVV KN�OC. LV yJ' a NN! •jN 6^ JL��' e .Y,. ° .• c s c c GJV ✓ d( CA �y�C L J a o� L •JI C •- e .9C Naoc o.a o >o V q O J mL�` SLY V•Y. rON yOiQ� 0= V SJ4 UV-IL U ^d� NT ��L u0� O i� ^q o` • N�W rVyq, `. QL QoVd w0y GOQ^ qO ^K yQ W E i o d J it r e .L- o• •L• ! G J C 7 d b O G .Le rO � C ro m tl A O L V V wN J \K1m1 6 1 1 L O V� I 4�rrl wi V •di CL wV P ^L C^ C�•� J V �TC L O A O C O _ O g w G G V C .L• r � A! ' 6' ! L � r N K NdA4 ` r rVgrJ� y ^`p 9 A OJO L 6 V P g V H N • C _j 1 C C J V � Q• V � C • u O V N wai V q V U y d N Q p C Y G a O V 4 V! M PS • O r� Q d t V ^ a O C T t O r � Q L y � C ! D r N O i_ A V 9 P d 9 N O L V r°+ J b = O• j p q w^ V r •'. N� C y C = l P 9` 7 Y L N L ^ L7 �� � V Y a y M Y C �E VlO YN � O G V r q OQ r = w O O V C C >� C •re !_ r r_ A= q A w ^ G� C O V Y �9 j1 idL q Vf�G L1 >.J q 6LC Y G.4 w O oL� OP.Oi� L PJVV O V�� Q tiq A LI p�J yTl L Er V VNA^ wV °V q A V VCOOVC •'�V.r'1rJ rA !V aVL NLC aLi"° q L N �q•�r ,"„mow ` aq jaaq cr Oi2 E. Z! _Lq l...� .a.. y er c g,"'r LN ¢ w_ ` .-O..0 J c V C V G i � .L.• ` a� V q V E A C N r CCV NW 6> w•^ O Nom. VC qLY_ C C .Lid N N g L N'J V N EZ u V! ` r6. o �LV wq L4 �IJ G�� o wJ ey aL a a ° ��ae V` Hfaw V `q q` J O r rnrS Lyy wA r CCJV L O N C d p^ � n q L� W V O a • V O N E� y w C q. S O � N N V O Q^ V N A r Q• r �`> S� 9 V T ° fi r C �L a L A yd T n i C i q 29 iOC2� eJ L -,.99 d L! T q C T^ N N V C O G b C V V.• �N Cr w ONO OJ w O C!O =YV � q pVLV aJV ` EVw ^_uLVV rLr V.La ^C O N iU�. �J ^ CL CO c d do .aib _ q�� c N ^M9N KN f.a LN iNVV KN�OC. LV yJ' a NN! •jN 6^ JL��' e •� v c^ L dU �Gy � LaT� G =N �LddE NCO 9JN Pu•_+ � PS nJC le'.r x�'O LV._ LCC �•� =i� .dam ZrF i'°xe_L �-• e� °do y d m m `W'a�� .°i-' N m•'o`c "^ c '; r � „° y _ 0 0 ,O ,n v ruW = S =rC .wn no uci�y :oTO `YiN OV �� r O W C r• S _l y L L L L d •_ O O ¢ar° y d W� •L.r lL. O L af ._ p_q W w O L •- P- n O` U C O w C •. W c nL °`., P A° g o '° o o Poo •. d o •v Sal •.. �' C• rr ^ Cr_ U QUIO Q SV On E,d¢ � _M to 2�VCta V a^O 9 • l J� _ � -. E W w G C 1 � Q W VVOPS =jj ' u 1 4 q Q Y D nI ^ O O Y W� Z O' V 4 rota F _vi bO O4 .0 u auw S_a \� C J V u C d •r ��- W d 4 y C Y w P C V Y° 4 Cr wU 0_i GQ n•`C L¢ ¢W etl �m J Z_'Si U V Y = u a d Y >[ V> d T L O J P 4 e a P y P L E V d � 9 d� L V d d n m` � a• G Y �NrV Can4 `� Gt 2V HG � w `O ° dv q -op nf+edL u Ll cP= � oar c. �� c 4r iMN 4 e CC ``J `PLn° q•L+•r Cl 1 Ld • 9lC •• r C - Q _O _a Ll C V r O � 4� J l r r C P •. � ar En 4 P V e O L L G v 6 0 d o� C m U O S C 4 -a €o ry LFr Qdq D E Y an rlWu 4yaLi �rWVtr S�CO T =l �u rF uu SCNP dOU_CO � d dS dui d�T�� YC aiia` aSw '� ¢VqJ ~VV U u�d OOU_C- On -F M L r _mow _• ouy °� Sl CO uOVO „L O OVa^� „ =� MOOV OOu O_rG u d nC �r dTr V d Jd o v� c m .afdNa. $s_. a. a • v 'e Pn *l PL •°, uv�'u T W1 -ru an .. — `q ?ad q N Vw ;j YE Qy _dodo .1'Llr ano 6� 4Oy� �uCS ° LM_V a.,rc .oF' Ygvd do our Y Nf O 0 n E 91. d� rid T v_ as o E d A d n „f O L u r F c o or p C u O p d a�q C O C d a `O•r O C O ^ S A m y d P P D C `no o v L M �- 6 V 9 C c� ro v ON • �I � -- =�oN� W 4 V d N d� J V u �I �I 6 O N pL C F_`°O'OFa O,C VVl c�u�S > 6 — mA om oy'E w - cN N V r V N Z LL, m �L� L _L Np V•JL 6 6 C V t7 9 = a � V �• I) Y u n °— C p L Y�oa N p— CV L O V C u - 1 9d cd?gJ A •u V d� rid T v_ as o E d A d n „f O L u r F c o or p C u O p d a�q C O C d a `O•r O C O ^ S A m y d P P D C `no o v L M �- 6 V 9 C c� 0 A 0 G i a p 9 O 6 D A L L A N C r� d p A d S n t p M 9 O L V C C N M� r O e M 9 V O D V^ u A 9 M ac V q t°J p d N S v D ; = 4 O 4 y° p C u Y V V V l r C p p �C pL. V 9W j C Lab r T ` y V LNa CC D �m0 4i P q � V •n C C V V • u L p O �� a V ` °F V M n' P < M F; p C L J I V V 9 [L ° N O �- J V — n R. 000 90�'•� rV yV �9V — � ydd V VdT L ^'� NC �O 9 C •w0 L 00 L- `r tr E f = e � -Dn H o �d rd �o •. °1Ay T r = V V Vc u r9 d. Nu pi pup V N I I u > I N 9 = N L 9 V V L N N N L' O• ` N N c o NN � ,er ry r d y I •C m c °� L T= w E E V N^ !:I nP 0•'� OnO�I u90 V9 y9W CM C 'u� a�° L` 1 `qYO oon 4 °'��. �4 �� .. PN m °:. .. :.• o^ °e -• I Lc °id �o ^ -v p1 Lw t cpp -- Hrn ce ,y ` I� Q M V 0 9 0 p �• L 6L C0 J V 9 L O r O C q^ O O C { VO L9 OCy 6V (Vr 4CL WS V9 S. 6L t!^ N M O N1 `�OVj1 m1 P • N � tf) � -- =�oN� W 4 V d N d� C N 00 •+L M C N pL C F_`°O'OFa O,C VVl c�u�S — mA om oy'E w - cN N V LL, m �L� L _L Np V•JL C 9 � V �• u Y u n °— C p L Y�oa � ° p— CV L O V C u - 9d cd?gJ A •u V C V� Cq OJL� Ey P: O '^ V >� •r L L O L � -r �� • d`> _ _C r L—^per C— F_ _ qp �• O S YI C- V a N J[L OS O mW PV^ N L y V y V C �' Vl C DVC >� On Pd Au niV d o opff CY n o u 9 p V C g 9 — W E n G L �' l � •C �, V O E w r VppP L P 4 u> q t r L V J^ W 4 u L W 9 C y O N 1-0 L V n - W r N L V 0 A 0 G i a p 9 O 6 D A L L A N C r� d p A d S n t p M 9 O L V C C N M� r O e M 9 V O D V^ u A 9 M ac V q t°J p d N S v D ; = 4 O 4 y° p C u Y V V V l r C p p �C pL. V 9W j C Lab r T ` y V LNa CC D �m0 4i P q � V •n C C V V • u L p O �� a V ` °F V M n' P < M F; p C L J I V V 9 [L ° N O �- J V — n R. 000 90�'•� rV yV �9V — � ydd V VdT L ^'� NC �O 9 C •w0 L 00 L- `r tr E f = e � -Dn H o �d rd �o •. °1Ay T r = V V Vc u r9 d. Nu pi pup V N I I u > I N 9 = N L 9 V V L N N N L' O• ` N N c o NN � ,er ry r d y I •C m c °� L T= w E E V N^ !:I nP 0•'� OnO�I u90 V9 y9W CM C 'u� a�° L` 1 `qYO oon 4 °'��. �4 �� .. PN m °:. .. :.• o^ °e -• I Lc °id �o ^ -v p1 Lw t cpp -- Hrn ce ,y ` I� Q M V 0 9 0 p �• L 6L C0 J V 9 L O r O C q^ O O C { VO L9 OCy 6V (Vr 4CL WS V9 S. 6L t!^ N M O N1 `�OVj1 m1 P • N � tf) O v G G d C O C r N y `0 0 C rn C V y I r O C q � uW - �r N V Y d y d O d L 21\ D L i N = ° o r v p ^ N r � O A ^ v d N v °c � ^•T' c� da Oy O 9 C D r 6 Y r O P N F >• O V V ar O 6 rn C w Y 4 M a vA I.N.O n Ci' D N v °L.•L �c N C h o � r V Y w• � �'•• E t o C q \ v o� o rn oYVN d'rb° a •" u L t V _ q � ^ � q N L V y P d L g p 9 L V Soq v� EOri ° ^ L y V C •' Oaj U N L� T C y O v v pp pi v d A � Du D +• ` V e, t N Y r N L t uP O N y C>i C V N ° O V`l L �� ` 0• O 0 NCO °L YV �d 3�Ib0 O. y O rnu m �: P C _ L .• d� -o ."oo o'er d —v qm LM 'v' o�.rn i�•'i• �u c o a.°J�a z u c a d C O C r N y `0 0 C rn C V y I r O C q � uW - �r N V Y d y d O d L 21\ D L i N = ° o r v p ^ N r � O A ^ v d N O v PA V .°,rte J° O V Oy O 9 C D r 6 Y r O P N F >• O V V ar O 6 rn C w Y 4 M a vA I.N.O n D N dY d N C _ O _ O V Y w• S N_ w C \ v o� o rn oYVN d'rb° a •" u V q � ^ � q N L V y P d L g p 9 L V Soq v� EOri ° ^ L y V C T O L N v v pp pi v d A � Du D +• ` V e, t N L C V N ° O V`l L �� ` 0• O 0 NCO °L YV �d 3�Ib0 O. y O rnu m �: P e O d J L .• O v rn V 9 C D r 6 Y N P N F >• rn C w Y 4 M O D N dY d N C ^ y p C a •" u ^ � q � L O C •M L= l V V 6 y L y V C T O L v v pp pi v d A � Du D +• ` V e, t N L y O rnu m �: P e O d J L .• d� .1I 0 11 �D n ►3:�i E E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DALE: September 14, 1983 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7000 - JAMES DE BOSE - A division of .�v acres - _; and into lots in the R- zone located on the south side of 13th Street, east of Jasper Avenue - APN 202- 024-15 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTi9N: A. Action Requested: Approval of parcel map. - R -I -8,200 B. Pur cse: To subdivide .54 acre of land into 2 parcels. C. Location: South side of 19th Street, east of Jasper Avenue. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 .25 acre Parcel 2 29 acre Proposed project density .27 acre acre (i1,761 sq. ft.) E. Exist ?ng Zonin North - R-1-8,200 South - R -I -8,200 East - R -I -8,200 West - A -1 F. Existing Land Use: Parcel 1 - vacant Parcel 2 - residence G- Surroundin Land Use and Zoning_ Nort - existing sirg a ami y - R -1 - 8,200 South - existing single family - R -1 - 8,200 East - existing single family - R -1 - 8,200 West - existing single family home - A -1 H. General Plan Designations: North - low ensity - 2 -4 du /ac South - low density - 2 -4 du /ac East - low density - 2 -4 du /ac West - low density - 2 -4 du /ac ITEM L PLANNING COMMISSION Parcel Map 7000 September 14, 1983 Page 2 STAFF REPORT I. Site Characteristics: There is an existing hrme on Parcel 2 with Parcel being vacant. The site drains to Gala Avenue. II. ANALYSIS: This map is a resubmittal of a previously approved Tentative arm Mlap no. 7000. The applicant failed to take any action on that approved nap within the time period of approval. This proposed map will create two parcels with the existing house being located within Parcel 2. Parcel 1 is vacant and will be developed it. the future. Improvement on Gala Avenue and 19th Street have been previously constructed. The owner has been requested to complete a lot line adjustment at the west property line of Parcel 1 to eliminate the odd shaped piece. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached fog your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon, completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. Res ctfully subm tted, LSH :jaa Attachments- Map Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study 11 11 �n—iln •n/ni as a It u It= - - - r t. urn now �q�q an } s Hu I � ��llii ►jmwn _ uu exi ucn uuaaa }. /p at 1O//aR st7W/Hp�/n 'i�ii•t i an! ma me ine ■ rnni w �eMn i an naaa�tn u�� unanna ma ! n �� ^.tt ttttli it ItlltrtWt/tO r : r = umu :i ai ii ■ � a �i• • F r� — a ♦ �n—iln •n/ni as a It u It= - - - r t. urn now �q�q an } s Hu I � ��llii ►jmwn _ uu exi ucn uuaaa }. /p at 1O//aR st7W/Hp�/n 'i�ii•t i an! ma me ine ■ rnni w �eMn i an naaa�tn u�� unanna ma ! n �� ^.tt ttttli it ItlltrtWt/tO r : r = umu :i ai ii ■ � a �i• • — a i'rtOarfO ay O.)e sliolt?).__ JdiCier! NMdi 4Y 6.Ow�s I ar Oar..-.. 91767 co .m (21'J 966 8 -0, O.e Dr :.vvr /oter eARL PMLLAR ,a. E. ria..r 31J0 Dn (]S li .Y 13u STREET r ils. fn Shp 9sz.rr. R: s la o: o• +. 25603 57 : T � L1 YT[ ].�� IV.O V'J2n]'% •u xa race a Dx,a -tva > "j Pcar PO,lal I Parts: 2 nora :)+r- ti+r s uu .vvaa, C.33: ... D..CC w • s +.__ e i116T 1 aD 1 p•t - /''� TENTATIVE MAP .A�(1 cE-L 44,4F 'r000 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s ',C OESCRIPTi ON Qomef I Parcel Map 5922. _ P.M.8 52/35 SiTE PLAN ,.. �ec;e:ximss n t t I NINETEENTH STREET r ils. fn Shp 9sz.rr. � L1 YT[ ].�� IV.O V'J2n]'% •u xa race a Dx,a -tva > "j Pcar PO,lal I Parts: 2 nora :)+r- ti+r s uu .vvaa, G ... D..CC w • s +.__ C:aC. ..:t � 11.iis Lp s.n.r.r` ..rr u1:M in rwi :] an m ..o..cr.. ^Rru,u.. ., ,r .+ .•r. i.] n.uuw n o-l. .... GALA+ AVE I n o v I. ray) i • _ I I I I � OL a I u] 7F !C' WS3 SiTE PLAN ,.. �ec;e:ximss n t t 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUMMONGA I'ivYTIAL S'i VDY FART I - PROJECT IINFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental. Assessment Raview Fee: $80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form, must be completed and submitted to the Develcpmnt Revicw Co=...aittee t:aSOugh the department 'rebe=e the project application is made. Upon receipt of dais applica.'•ion, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Pare; . "I of the Initial Study_ The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant (jiving further information concerning the proposed project_ PARCEL MAP # 7400 PROJECT TITLE: — APPLICAN'T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 986 8707 24 hest I Street ontario 91762 MIME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: _ I= S CARL xFMLER 6841 EUCALYPTUS AVE CARL ANAHEIM LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS A_ND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) �$outh side of 19th Street 200' East of Jasper Ave, Zlaaaacnr No 9n? 024 714 LIST OTHER PERI'KT_TS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL„ REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None a -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 2 single family residences_ ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SOUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Area 24000 Sq Ft_ DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOPI'UMON ON TOPOGRAPFY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AIM THE DESCRIPTION OF' ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AIM THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, - may as a whole have significant enviror.�nental impact? �7e 11 I- 2 LI RILL TT_iIS PROJECT: ' YES NO x 1. x 2. l Create a substantial change in ground contours? Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.;°. 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? x S: Remove any existing trees? How many? _ x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPoiYTAIQT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and inforaation reouired for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and info=.nation presented are tree and correct to the best of ryi:nowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be 'made by the Devel ment Review Committee. p Late �+ O Signatur Title 3 2 -3 RESIDE11TIAL CONSTPUCTIO`I The following irforsatior_ should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name o£ Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Parcel Map 7000. Specific Location of Project: south side of 19th Street 300' East of Jasper 3. Number of single famil,, units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date prcposed to begin ccnstruction: 4. Earliest date OT Modal a and n of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Rana- 3 90a- 5 y boawi ;� PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 2 -C' PHASE 4 TOT AL 2 -r _4 RESOLUTION NO. � � �iLl A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7000 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7000), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 19T14 STREET, EAST OF JASPER ACENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7000, submitted by James DeBose and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the south side of 19th Street, east of Jasper Avenue, being a division of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 5922 as recorded in Book 52 page 35 of Parcel Maps; and WHEREAS, on August 2, 1983, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above- described Tentative Map; and WINEREAS, on September 14, 1983, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION rZE '.VED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmenta impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on September 14, 1983. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7000 is approved subject to the recommended-Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairmar rr Resolution No. Page 2 ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIOMEP,S: 11 11 I] 11 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REC(WIENDEO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: South side of 19th TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO: 7000 Street east of Jasper Avenue DATE FILED: August 2, 1963 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 5922 as recorded in Parcel Map 65 Pace 35, GROSS ACREAGE: .54 County of Sart Bernardino ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 202- 024 -15 tl rir* k+ t* �, r* ir* iri -*t*ir **!t****�,rlrlril�r+c*+: • r�ktifil r�, ta�t�Ac *iclr.t�,tM',t�,tirkrx�c�rx- ,tit *�- kt *i#lnrirlr 1 �1➢ 1 J7;� 1 7' ENGINEERd!1RVEYOR James DeBose same Richard Newton 700 S. Flower Street, #2 ^c0 Los Angeles, CA 90017 624 West "F" Street Ontario, CA 91762 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. 2. 3. x 4. Dedications shall bp made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: 19th Street contiguous to parcels. 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. Surety 6. All existing easements lying within, future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated or. the map per Zity Engineer's requirements. 7. Easements for sidewalk foi public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recording for and /or prior to building permit issuance for 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit for Street Improvements ursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subidiver may enter into an agreement z'.d vost with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sic;z alk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - section streets. 3. Construct the following missing i-pr ^UA_ _nts: Prior to recordation for Prior to building permit issuance for Curb & Street Naro. Gutter] A.C. Pvmt. Side- Walk Drive Appr. Street l Street Trees ti ht s A.C. Overlay Median Island* Other *Includes landscaping and irrigation or meter 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained AMML from the City Engineer's Office, in additicsi to any other per-nits required. 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required arni shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. _ 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff 11 Grading X 1, Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Ccde, City Gradino Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Reauirements and Approvals 1, Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control District Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of *.he final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance or 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, the applicant shall complete a lot line adjustment at the west property line of Parcel 1 to eliminate the odd shaped piece. CITY OF RANCHO OXAMOMA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: E 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCMdONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 19833 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: John Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer rru SUBJECT: REVISION OF CONDITIONS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12 332 - LABAND - A custom lot residential subdivision of lo,s on 40.9 acres of land it the R -1- 20,000 zone located on the east side of Haven Avenue, north of the Hillside Drainage Chennel - APN 201 - 121 -12 I. PP03ECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of a change of the concept of interior street use from public to private with self - closing, sliding security gates. B. Lecation: East side of Avenue, north of the Hillside anne . C. Parcel Size: 140.93 acres. D. Existing Zoning: R -1- 20,000 (SFR). II. ANALYSIS: A. One street, "Court P" has been changed from a cul -de -sac to a through street which increases circulation characteristics. B. The construction of the streets will not change in respect to standards and quality, with compliance to the attached conditions. C. The entry streets "A" and "C" are expanded to include raised concrete islands with landscaping. D. Planning Commission Resolution No. 83 -66 adopted on May 11, 1983 conditionally approved Tentative Map 12332 with public streets. III. FACTS FOR FINDING: The findings as listed in Planning Commission Resolution No. 83-66 are unchanged. ITEM M PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Revisions to conditions for Tentative Tract 12332 September 14, 1983 Page 2 IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. V. RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission concurs with the findings of said conditions of approval as recommended, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, 6 LBH:1M:j>raJ Attachments: Map Resolution Conditions 11 \:J e ®�Min2 'if � � / /.''��✓ ,$��ia a+�5 igr it 3 �J .$: ., f I Ali • !�. - 1 ' ^8 J11A IL ll I ' "'� s oo-/ . $'i � _ /. � � �.. •�I ?tom �..� q1 !:7 o• ' "/. � r'r� � - � - T+.t -o.e+ �1r ��_l�r��.s 11r:rYJ��'f N /• // n� -4 -v // =N ,�y�= ?_ /,••1 �� � 'E- �LF YI� a.v � �' ICI i � _ Vie• S 3 e, �� '• � � -,' �(Zi 'S'� _�u� -��: �c —��f�� -t � 'y 'ail �q�rr•i�: _ /[mil /? - aS.1 ab A''�1\t' \ �\_t. :'.i�7 •I'.r, j,�lr�/ /„ref C� '7"� =v a - °�,�C r� •'. �;� /� /�� i����{. ' / � • _E S�Jy] /�%/�•r ''''V � - ''� �.• 7'�1�'(3�j � 3 � 31t` t ___ —� - -r, io �� /J! r C 1�- ��r, f 1'` n ya�' \;10•. � ��i•�� T �w--. - `i—� �'o ,� I�� 1.: '![(K:R¢•t �- ewe- `t3nnn,. _�.wflt- '. .t-i �sA o C� a� tIa N p F E �i i� P h O t o Y L CL o m S Uo CO' V L m MI C. Q D , rill )f �ib7tti s; p'a a? fi , S y i i 11 LI 11 j� ►I i F �i •1 � r � � _ � � / P Aryryj \ r •� of � } I / UJ S as f'+ Iii }' 1' / ��a�"'IV •. c E U one, T _ T 1 RESOLUTION NO. '6 A RESCi-UTiON OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING RESOLUTION NO. 83 -66 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12332 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12332 hereinafter °Map" was submitted by Walter Laband, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the ream property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a custom lot residential subdivision into 204 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission. for public hearing and action on May 11, 1983; and WHEREAS, said Map was conditionally approved by a resolution of j Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga numbered 83 -66; and WHEREAS, applicant has requested a change in use of the internal streets of said Map from Public to Private Use; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planninc Division's reports and has considered Other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: 0 SECTION 1: The Planning Commission Resolution No. 83 -66 attached hereto and by reference is made a part hereof, omitting the standard conditions. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12332, a copy of which is attached hereto, ated August 1983, is hereby approved subject to the attached standard conditions and the following special conditions. PLANNING DIVISION 1. A signature sign -off shall be contained within the individual homeowner CC&R's designed to alert the buyer as to the requirement for street trees, including maintenance. Prior to occupancy, street trees and slope plantings on individual parcels must be inspected and approved by the City. 2. Parkstrip landscaping and street trees, with appropriate irrigation systems shall be required along streets °A" and "C ". The required landscaping and street trees may be added with each phase of street construction. Ll 11 Resolution No. Page 2 3. All slope banks in excess of five (5) feet in vertical height and OT 2 :1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated (with subterranean sprinkler systems) in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City. The slope planting shall include one 5- gallon or larger size tree per 250 square feet of slope area, one 1- gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 square feet of slope area, and appropriate rooted ground cover. Hydroseeding shall not be allowed due to the rocky nature of the soil material. 4. The proposed security gate entrance system shall be approved by the Foothill Fire Disr "ect and the County Sheriff's Department, prior to approval and recordation of the final map. ENGINEERING DIVISION 5. Standard condition no. L -1 shall now read: Dedication of ingress and egress and maintenance easements overall interior streets shall be dedicated on the Final Map to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering and Public Works Divisions; the Cucamonga County Water District; the San Bernardino County Flood Control District; Southern California Gas Company; Southern California Edison Company". 6. The northeasterly portion of the project area (Flood Control District Easement) shall be made a part of the tract map. The C.C.&R.s for this tract shall make provisions to incorporate this area into the Homeowner's Association once this area is developed. 7. An access easement by separate instrument shall be provided to the property lying east of the project area (owned by San Bernardino County Flood Control District). The document shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the District. This condition shall be waived if the access is not required by the Flood Control District. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. PLANNING COM+SISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY:— L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST Secretary of t he arming Commission Resolution. No. Page 3 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: _r b_ d Y ^ YP M T P. d Vbb 8.r O l C F G C� C C C u C V y d N O gV �t� OVY TN id^ d ` ON L q � Nm TYV A a V 2 V V V V_ ✓ ." N q V� C^ G N y` a C .5.. CW ^m qby u `d_�r ^iG Yb0 INtP P C 6 CEO L r V A 6 G Y d 0 u.O D D ` b r W V O u olcL QC V�� VwA V�JV Q< LG Or Cy QI q' V e.- T d L 0 V L 9 O L >f L^ O V V S V 00- G N Yp N O N5 e r bOV U LLB S C ^L_ON OY^ 6OT^ LB qC0' N <N L > L L T V Y dM ✓O Ne mU•. CAm A ^` L tl�Nq qn U'b NJ LAN 6N 'c L+W.N� �� L P.Y A'"yI +•o r:^ v <_ ez OAN q0 pVp $ VY V Pt ^VJ� `C� �Y. Nm O `qm C6ppp V 6TO.. U� OO <y�L _ NOY. J VV CY VYp. mL Y . „`N U' ^Yr 6r GL V y V` OL GC Ly NL NG L9N s V �6.ON ^ � 0 9� 4 V D L O 6 L 0• G J O' f..� 6 M C a � A m P to Gm yy WAY e` .a 3 O `• A W Dq< V VY dl0 > M7 '�p b L m V L b V y Q q b C L A N V] b 0 ✓pp V P Y C V O y6 M V` O't _ ~ W O O T L y R 6 W m y C -0 l it a` 0 8 m g 9 a s �ii 1 F al w.� °PbL NW ^tl u °u y` 5 ore n C q • V S G G p A 9 J J E� < Y Y � L m` vNM l q •� L AL _C Ati•D K�” Gg mJa `: Ji � G Wr 4« 4 VbC `N i n G O > G APP �� • pQ.di NCO dD OC N -EO V ' �1 A7L t'•dG 6� OLO V> GAh O O '21 ODY O'N Gq qy 6y` =C g q ° V S o" 4C u O�.T• 70 Yc ^ O t1 u >y t q6q O q q i N W O E u � �NFE� a• `y ?rE 4'w _i e j tl�L u G q A y Y .U.GLO �S�L ICJ qC <m CyE LN` rVO. y� pp p V6m H6 L6 � A �� VY Sji N • O per' q T «y ^qu �di «•C•u PNL «Ci9 T ✓ELM 'd {CO th q ✓ oo yd�r_edmTT A�4 CV O C✓ A _ ✓C T9" L ✓N C CC V✓`•'VNO ^V✓ d � �� + V �q« Ogip_ °OANVCNEV «- bo o Pvq JA _ d O n C ✓ O C --Z O ` p ` y 9 q q l O= C' u O V 9 O ^'s -� b V l U q w• L 6 F_ « t" « u V6yEJU O r�q� �S r1.rWUr_YO= u Q _ •^ L N n N ° C u n A i o i o q u i m 9t q. •' > C E q Y 9 q N r y L U Y C E E N J u J u E q r✓ G A M O �.� q^ c C •.n q V O =rU 9 cc- V L V LhOa �� dgOCV9 qN °-•a ly �-• ^y ��✓ V [ MLLE nCJr q r�qL LN Cr ••i n O ` TX ci 6 d P✓ C C Ly O \• > O c ✓` ` n: d 6 d o N u V 0 v •� C o- 9 ✓ -T= r d � C V L b~ a t L u � J y y 0 c L T L V A -•� q L e q o a ✓✓ `o g ° r d N c vcfHL eJ «b a «.N.�S� ✓c Nq o _ r C., S g p V C O � ✓L ✓ q C d i L" i w^ ?- v o 9 v % O ° •..q ✓m FOgVgMe Y✓W °s O L U c o ° A v• s -' n i o� y ✓ � L V �^ Y L� G v -r i c N ^L N om- ui °✓ u q � C �.: qag a L q r�.p "'^ c'° °e -q '• ? ✓ ✓'W a Wv � u C q �r q V N r p✓ nS r V V` L u L O i [C l 9 `i € ✓ _�n i°' 2L, ib�0� c 1prA`q 'J"«q n ° °-• y � b � e✓ c yA V✓ bCV �rQEI -J ��yVi:5 C �CgON 9V 2] pTq NL ^c LE qOl L N ✓O L Q' LnC PL_q ruiCq qC° CpSp V NJ T i-•w� � �i _ y� C MP �O d�n` ncL 4r�0 'r 6gLT N �e'V N� rL AgLi q9D N L O G L n - V ` i C y e q y~ d L n✓ g r O UL P' d� V r L O O ^ q V '� GOgQV O� b�,uOF >p r JvLidrq C f.l C✓ N u P V V N d - q y » Vi i✓ >._ Cq J'� p A d � O L D ^^ VI �� L O« N � N' ` Y•C pL pLN V n y= 06 N � dq- y E •.'L r u `6 p!C w C` LCggn n`C r u N =0 9 C� V• J p q V r 9 r 0� q X C C PpC i �' P O V q O u b V V N V v u b V � r�yG{ C ✓ L_ J u L v i _ O p g V C 6 C_ 4 V✓ C r A C L Z C C V O C> W C d M d' 9 J C M _ V C _ T' N V• L L q �C J q i A Y b Q u L T E Cy r -w ✓bW ^TUN GNU Y✓ ^N�u� ✓O r_ . NA C ✓.C^sq NJ ^9C0� � J Y N z O O O ` L l i N i NO ✓ O OC <Er6 �G 6� 6n O•r2 qNG✓_ L_V 6�J LN qY_ � L Y <9N O .OU t ✓L >C ^U2-ECq LLN✓€ -�U"O -• J < « ✓y✓ L` C q � i .• M �_ u V w � O Cy VCy � O M V V U q V 9 y� q V r n N 0✓ W N d L `t> 6 A f � q y-Z d OOCq E q E T l L F K C° l 6✓ -4,;z V N l C O u L N V P Mq _� ✓ r W rV EE O N ^Nn 9 P✓ bQ Wi weEivv i ey.-E c d m�ye qd Ya ✓ Nr -V yA NpJt` �� C •� O•L.•LW •L.n q ✓ y S r^ i N ^ d. O ' Z.:2 y q g •C9c �� N �O�lNtNV bPC Mt N6�q u C V gNg9 _O O � q T• npy VCr b P9 p V C r LJV Vn �gPOyA C VC CC KN'q G .O V 6m C jL` C ✓ �� ^ �•N �d 9 ✓ L CO V N C O y. C d ✓ C « q d C • y c C c V y q -• qr 4✓ N c C y • J O T G_ y V g Y 0 q • ° d� C q 0 E T! • r � C C� V _ „ E A' q 2 76 SIC^ o9 PV -ZLCOC. NCB yV N N q�N •� T n � L T V LC � • u d Y V>L•pCE vi✓ �� �im_PC« V N -L'OV �LVG j0 CC q ✓ =� op O d N H O J W V � N g N O N b C^ � C O C u A� V N e G✓ r y En C q= W e r' a v n P� > ✓i. s V L O «✓ V O �V N L c 1 E O N T d O >✓ C c C T^ C O n V q 4 Y c E- .4 N✓ f > P C C d q N N a c ' i C P _ O' ✓ qCq cPC7 C r yE O O^ MV V J d S d N b S_ �� 9 C q i9 b S r 6 O V✓ q �� C L C q C 9 =51 > q C C L L L r gG 9 b° ✓c - mn�°e rJCtyd by y. c � r=� {�e� O M � Y J� E L p g N _ O C q_ n ACC. C� � J N ✓ � C C q O Y•f M m i l= N 6 Z P O W ✓ n V L L L C Q P �. 9 O G C M C Nr ✓ ✓r y O A A V�r✓ v N r� V Ou O O O N V E C N 2 r c v r :J c Y r • q d � q M O C W q M `' V C > l l M A O v 0:5 u E y q v✓ da°i�a �• 4` °v - CV �9 qJ P C P•V.r V O Y v� O i _ t �� N O LL C O O V C� N V T E A L C C N T 6 V g Y A" V o q q` M d Oq ✓ V Y dm W O a V ✓b ✓u �L VVF n t_ N L N q q J✓ d t e q� l C � b„ N N L V O 6 V M � X C q Q C✓ QU q N_ N 6� W^ �� S C D 1+ 11 N M O Z J U m i d E [ -. '. +c �] q C y fl✓ C V f 4 r t v N O q v S o� P� O i L C 4 Ems' T q � D 4LP D «� Ns A 4 6 M^ „ r Nu•i 4V V 4 O � O u N E P i L C L G y r 4 6 r r V 6 O S d w P V 6 O. N a N V N Q c 6 4 44�P A 6 C wO C � L `p i � a p l L L_ AL d 4 L✓ ^ L P ^ ✓ C N O J C 4 L 9 i N t L f c 6L L Oti Ca 6 « A S « V O ay cin� M r O « L A q W V G > ° v N � f ✓\ �cp c= F C > ^ A p 6 P~ O C « ^ O N Y P6 L r V 6 9 « C C T O O D N N e q 4 V O L P l yL•' ` � V OyV•r V O 4 N y E V L M ✓ O qa 9 q ° •.l1 i w o d11 rl O1jv J 'T W a� i O rN V a ° L q N O c ° N O C v A 1 V 9 y L L d .3 L O PAC O J N p P� E Ng ed i PP `CC C c � J A 6 G m N� �.d ^at b.Lr PL c ^orN eo r d Nv�s pLgVLyNO.gV G� =a ,. V V M A FL Q « < O d L q ` a� r J M^ N v C C ✓ = 9 N Q Y C N�✓ O O 9 �� O �• O 9 N O. V Vp C N C 4 V 9 > C _M pGF ^o E=� a.r L Pn �VqV �O Dr d.Li�� C J q N '• � r �V G L d q A d Q 6 Q d ^ D r v O 9 O J G DCVO �q q y Cy NyQ V."•O L ^✓ «i9✓ q C« i N Q d✓ 6 C L N V ^ M 4« 9 � T j_ J P 9 V Cztc �Y. ^N PO 7J DJt • try VA ��L� ✓CiLOC G q Y L d N - 4 t^ L O ✓ u N A w✓ N t' T(/ C 6✓ L O> J 9 y 2 q> V 9 N N 1 V C r P �V O 6 M q LN NE NV �O]•..r ° `�S yC U yd Gy Q�.L.A CT L N i 4 L 'O Y C> d S CrNOG AFL eY CgggO �C^ pyw .L+ y R ✓4= - �i Ca N ^� e�.°� C AAC�> =` C q TLS !�{C�� AF T CC,y JV GNN CSV� pTp O U G ^V ^ q rNVCC ^V� �`p C N .O�• O ^�rq dL r V O. «J P C' Cq? C���P ^d✓ A ^C OVGd OIL PgCV' LCV^ C VdO KIZ �a« LNdOL ✓. Mq fMy JLE� QA�06 tt°i ► our .7.• ti N_ W +c �] q C y fl✓ C V f 4 r t v N O q v S o� P� O i L C 4 Ems' T q � D 4LP D «� Ns A 4 6 M^ „ r Nu•i 4V V 4 O � O u N E P i L C L G y r 4 6 r r V 6 O S d w P V 6 O. N a N V N Q c 6 4 44�P A 6 C wO C � L `p i � a p l L L_ AL d 4 L✓ ^ L P ^ ✓ C N O J C 4 L 9 i N t L f c 6L L Oti Ca 6 « A S « V O ay cin� M r O « L A q W V G > ° v N � f ✓\ �cp c= F C > ^ A p 6 P~ O C « ^ O N Y P6 L r V 6 9 « C C T O O D N N e q 4 V O L P l yL•' ` � V OyV•r V O 4 N y E V L M ✓ O qa 9 q ° •.l1 i w o d11 rl O1jv J 'T W a� i O rN V a ° L q N O c ° N O C v A 1 V 9 y L L d .3 L O PAC O J N p P� E Ng ed i PP `CC C c � J A 6 G m N� �.d ^at b.Lr PL c ^orN eo N -bsW � D pLgVLyNO.gV Y d d° C ,. V V M A FL Q « < O d L • V C q Y.V O V O C� cMy�N40r ✓ d A C g q N « C 4 V L L N a C A- =°u Lv r6 icv'c° i . '•\ dr >p« EAR ✓ 4 l .°.. P L L a°✓ C L J r V d V ✓ « O P L 9 C C� y V C ✓_ �✓ L A a M N O C L ^ V d 9 i ..E o r q N= P a N } q °c «n° a rn OCC n^ of M ^ E. GNa E_NL 6 M� rp N 6 « Y 0 k�w e c N� C- c L v v 0 0 a a L N N p C p w M N O « C C� ✓ e O tg L C6 V O d v L C O V Y L L d V Cv Q vs l L A U V M M 01 g V w M L L�'LNN� ob C y V «V2Pp\? C �' T• ° O V ✓ V V ^ � L yy p q N n --Oct N 9 R «9 a V yyGGP _ A N « p � M C a y V V N V C 6P�0✓Ofp O N M N O a+ ^ „p` NO�LL Li D < N T N Y Y \O' Cl) M N_ Z Y V TJ 0 L d c q a c _ 9q ^_L J- U N T N 9 c�Od T ^ U C .Ur C C pUYY r L u L -Nm c S N a q Cam' �p ✓ G 7 u O PL V T co^ £ A d C q bT V O y ✓ d V LL AGO ✓_ cF a ✓ T ✓ L O A ` ✓ d V Gq O w E N.•.� L ^ o � p -G ✓W .NrO A O 6 9 Cd O a w 9 _ i v n > c 4 cq d 6 W Ac C o V 6 L dr y L • L u t L O t Tt,u C P A✓ MfNJ _VN = V b L • ✓ A ✓ r d LEA <P p V v � L - ✓ ^ L ^ q d V V _ EOq a L�pa `o -v•'c F qOu A •�L pO N a. Jd v T L ` e N � C 4awA 6 �•qt•O n� r. r d a 1= r r O ~ O > S V n < A r O r O N n° aq L V �o V L A O T V v o c` r LL T V ^ V � A d �L 4s d O V Vj A < y C L � r 9 L G V d C E L vc d 9 � L p` d n� t, s ✓ u -dw - ' N Nso N a VFW o ^ qN•• >•Ou O C P � cA V LL EZ at 4 _ N � N O aP <ol Lrn P bR.b > q Pba d L y° - � c ¢` ✓« o EL J d 'g WIF 1N V _ p- r✓ pLL ^ r L d0 Li Vu^ <LO = J P - L O V✓ V - V •r+Ci � CY OVy - {�S y c CC L y✓ _� A L c V r V O N ^ L y C 0 i VL 9 < Su � AGO VC< T =- y N G < L � p N V y L_ O A v N v .✓e q N o V .L..L. O G •' V n �_ N P d I L d 4 V u � 9 O A p y T L p G V q✓ • d q 6 C N�C� OC�LL ^ Y �4.` y r •V Lb 6c bG c acv Np < �' < •Lid Q V d O V� T 9 N L n✓ q✓ y C^ ,°r A � J N g T '€ ==Yo L Q W b V I V° E V V PN JO, �• d T V V N Li b _ n ° S J P ✓ C m V O m -- x G Op q O 6 d 6 L I J d O E � W� �% ✓C 6 nv G I 1 1 3 LL..+ n �f. V u: � `ICV'I r 1 ZL .Air t' •Pdp! r NyN "c N� uy Js do —c�.c AL NL°C ,1 Y-Z OE - L p L 62 �Y n V^ Pn Cgy r C N [ELO ODD ^�`LV QLPn n V�P 1]�9 N Om t+90L!✓ P✓ PypCC q PLC V C C CO ✓ ✓ 7E W • y r ✓ -N T OY p^ p O ^ N V O y� � 6VG WNO WVV �° tJ06I6Y 6PV 6VV•O 14� A d �L 4s d O V Vj A < y C L � r 9 L G V d C E L vc d 9 � L p` d n� t, s ✓ u -dw - ' N Nso N a VFW o ^ qN•• >•Ou O C P � cA V LL EZ at 4 _ N � N O P•• V =A C A Y V Y T �l v < r o a Gt�o> V P ns < ° F � °yam O 6 ✓ r V m E c c c 6�' d0 p` r A yO m< V E Suite' 0 •L.I V ✓ A ` Ai r m �o c q` o— V N � G O G �✓ h Ld VW L NI ��b �I >1 O O! up NI O� r U O •N>� a A - V ^ O C A C r d L y° - � c ¢` ✓« o EL J d 'g WIF 1N V r✓ ✓ .ViOf O A r Vu^ <LO = • O u 1 ✓ ✓ A Y 6�0 � CY OVy - {�S c CC RL A �4 T =- y N G < L S V y d O A F6 LL O L O V O q C d P cdLp = � ✓= .L+�I Z 1 m q��o N�C� OC�LL rV �4.` y r •V Lb 6c bG c acv Np < �' C^ L L •Lid Q v° l O L >� C C, � d �•- L• y M N j j q✓ y C^ F � J N g T N N y v u ==Yo L �✓ b V I L V V PN JO, �• d T V V N Li b _ n ° S J P ✓ C m V O m -- x G Op q O 6 d 6 L I J d O E � W� �% ✓C 6 nv G I 1 1 3 LL..+ n �f. V u: � `ICV'I 1 1 P•• V =A C A Y V Y T �l v < r o a Gt�o> V P ns < ° F � °yam O 6 ✓ r V m E c c c 6�' d0 p` r A yO m< V E Suite' 0 •L.I V ✓ A ` Ai r m �o c q` o— V N � G O G �✓ h Ld VW L NI ��b �I >1 O O! up NI O� r U Z U G1 •ry Q i d O N i a� ,a Z N d P n o a c N_C o � A c o 3 N q CC V d P d o c v N •°n A ^Lv L sVtlR C ° V d V V O �qD w 4 E d'C sa >c CN C dy wv�c6 V y V C Y q i V ° C d 0 N Y V V Qy OL F a M N C E yQ L P O O v a v S q V O p ct_T g V p Y f 2 D Z d°^ NE' .N w �mE VS Wes` VN O Y 6 V d C V mL 6 6V•L+ 4Y <pL WZ n a`o 0 9 Y lUh r E c r qd N 6 V `dV V O a u„ o N = P i 9 L � C O C w � Y Y y C S N E d s i �C> LnN rr d^ . P _ O L C = O y r CJ q A n Y g. J 4 O 7 a C N 1 o � C ^ 8 y 9^ C L r C Z P Lei N ^ ^ N z o c VO = 8v ^ ^ ` m q N � V O � E i Y w• u E c c F 6 L V ^ N M dlC CN �� ^d6 yqC OWN °'gym •Lw N O 7V C'C y�RNP Y�L aC 0.0 P y V m N g Z Q y w.r wC. CC � NOr L Q y Ym q0^ C V C^ J L 7 J 4 q D L b: on vnm w°b'�cq a.i V^ C E w C L V ^gib OIL Tu.° -iL� V. y2�NCOv 20 ^N O ✓� 6Fa 6D 0•+ Sl ° N'Y �_ diNCi VIE OgOC YC y c °^ cc 6.0 V L ✓ O � !Z P• T b N � V O e` NYC d =v b J V y P Y A L ^ Y ^Oyu m`Q SHa^ C P °'�trC b�C Cp�O Ni qnG C� L C O 24 .2° y q q P �mQb T r d N. L tYV Yp V9> NCl TWa �^_wpS ^ OVV V•r NCCC9N GgVO o6 ^C^ .Lmaa 60V OPq m t O� L 6 d ! e y i 2 N q Q =� N d t L M ^ L ^ C P ^ O f p C w y 0 y V V C O m b C e T E E e ^ C m m n r^ M q y V CO CN 1 q y O V C mI r m� S� y1 J d 0 P C 4 w 9 C q V T °c N � ` T V V 1 r � { 2 6 1111 Y °N' f� L C C O O O O C U P b. ^ C y ^ �c 2 V � a`119L O � L 11 LL ° V V O O V E l q V O N L N � 4 \{ 1 LO ` L L V V b °6 d d 9v m mV � � co- a a N q q V V V Y> N V m9D p pwn. P P� C C N.. pv c cE L La b bT cwq p Y Y c ` `• E ° °i =M6 9 9F ^ ^v t N N C ^ ^ L 0 O a E E C a Cy L � T L n a`o 0 9 Y lUh r E c r qd N 6 V `dV V O a u„ o N = P i 9 L � C O C w � Y Y y C S N E d s i �C> LnN rr d^ . P _ O L C = O y r CJ q A n Y g. J 4 O 7 a C N 1 o � C ^ 8 y 9^ C L r C Z P Lei N ^ ^ N z o c VO = 8v ^ ^ ` m q N � V O � E i Y w• u E c c F 6 L V ^ N M dlC CN �� ^d6 yqC OWN °'gym •Lw N O 7V C'C y�RNP Y�L aC 0.0 P y V m N g Z Q y w.r wC. CC � NOr L Q y Ym q0^ C V C^ J L 7 J 4 q D L b: on vnm w°b'�cq a.i V^ C E w C L V ^gib OIL Tu.° -iL� V. y2�NCOv 20 ^N O ✓� 6Fa 6D 0•+ Sl ° N'Y �_ diNCi VIE OgOC YC y c °^ cc 6.0 V L ✓ O � !Z P• T b N � V O e` NYC d =v b J V y P Y A L ^ Y ^Oyu m`Q SHa^ C P °'�trC b�C Cp�O Ni qnG C� L C O 24 .2° y q q P �mQb T r d N. L tYV Yp V9> NCl TWa �^_wpS ^ OVV V•r NCCC9N GgVO o6 ^C^ .Lmaa 60V OPq m t O� L 6 d ! e y i 2 N q Q =� N d t L M ^ L ^ C P ^ O f p C w y 0 y V V C O m b C e T E E e ^ C m m n r^ M q y V CO CN 1 q y O V C mI r m� S� y1 J d 0 P C 4 w 9 C q V T °c N � ` T V V 1 r � { 2 6 1111 Y °N' f� L C C O O O O C U P b. ^ C y ^ �c 2 V � a`119L O � L 11 LL ° V V O O V E l q V O N L N � 4 \{ 1 LO d 0 P C 4 w 9 C q V T °c N � ` T V V 1 r � { 2 6 1111 Y °N' f� L C C O O O O C U P b. ^ C y ^ �c 2 V � a`119L O � L 11 LL ° V V O O V E l q V O N L N � 4 \{ 1 LO \{ 1 LO N V% M Y V cl .n 0 i 0. El 0 L p d w L d L L O l y Q S ✓ T O d i b ^ Ni ✓i — V Y C d c s d+ — u a C u a i T °W d d9 (e' p0 N uqi° ^ ° _".r �✓ dN I � ✓ l A 9 W C ^6'I OC SG � d l 9q �V yd brri= I yd vb b � q P ~ 9 ^✓ C` C 1 r O d N d d O_ V E n q q W V o N Pv — °> C W P .e T ✓u. O V d 00 d 9 A R ^0= "_O� O� pP d O C ✓ aC> 9@ ✓ y L Q _ ✓_ q= nOp ` v ✓ WI l V LuC O'l. �l C `b ^C I V A' O d 9 O O b L ✓ d V d I L L O ^_ V 9 LLd i Y�9 I �W✓ 6nN <w LA JY O 1 1 IN.AiT r« 6✓ G O _ .a. N .•f f r!. .° m °. N = o I au b q ✓ c 9 c —^ N a O p Ll L OCd t� L C MOw w Na✓ � ^N ✓V✓ q 9 N y q P y ✓ O— _ C C N 9 i P« V 9 N i h ` o V L C y c d ybE °cNi ° a M✓ qO .L+ �t .>.• .°. d E RrV VG4 Nqn`� � O9L 9 ✓LL b `d >t — Z O � ^i �OZ d �L ✓ ^� ENO « C �7q tJV O✓ N J ✓ 9 ✓ -J ° ✓ C p V P O > i 9 C N .—n O l 1 Ap E S ✓ l W = L< — � w MAN � ✓ i✓ A ✓ 1 t d b C� — V V O N « 6✓ d N y u � P= t � n NO l O V r q C C N. O> C l 9 r°r ^ 9_ O i C 6 VO 6P21p— 6 O O VY. E✓ C O O O C 9 f n✓ — _ Pt - y q q V ✓C CW �6` � n d4LEpN i CyyV — u✓ '°Jqd P.✓i. Y CN E G� j�gaT ca..v 'e v a io d °c' muo� �' '..N, cga✓i wi, 9q CfJ.rLy ry i V« �"c — 9 oy lq1 bl C TN✓ v c ✓pL c d; My cE —" oi` — s^ o Na -- o d - ^d —b s q c � 6e.L�N vip Ey «� p i �S� '✓d^d E� r'L/' n.✓.. I yEV C✓ 4NC p is d b d„`� c cc L Pc o"nd- cy � �9_.. ,;� '- a ✓^ ssi G'O� b L a� �nc• on vc ^LVLC N q F O I C 7 q C q C I9 C g d T q L C ^ y d C'O P d• l G N p q S O J gprJ a Qi —2, P �` y G n U✓O C d N �^ P— C „ ^W � O d V C ^C E L_ C W ✓ C N q ^✓ C C q 9 _ _ c V �_� A_w L W ✓ 9 On^ yi J— ✓✓W uCi y� ✓lOW CN dN O L^ e�9CCy •+ C 6J V L V e� Q W6'• i -J N VC JC — y �q ` n 9 VP V — NQ. b✓ a b l �� N dV •�_ d N > W t —L OW✓ A —� Cq 16 NO✓O 6V IE 6.L..W %nW q^ Gw.tii NNW pVy 6V 6— WwNIIV 36 VQ El 0 'J I 0 v ai G L d E .'o x C _ D N P O G O rt d c O O y C O N o d V d O d � r ` y P O u ` o� u— a u d G DL o d 9 n C L N c L S d J D � c L N p M S n o d V d d Tj n— r P_T r V 9 uVi T H O V C M = v M S c L �r o ci w c e `w C J o$ � E d M C o - w O 1 —ev C r . J. L d L D O r V E 9 O E E i Jd L ^r> iOOd A V D Gp q c�.N. dre GHQ v d c L P S .32 > d u oid o:+n f V v 9 O S N .T, 2 E V u L 6 E L 9 c A v C ^ V C 6� � 1 r' J Y. 6 9 a a p v y W C d e d > D 9 r M v L � G Q L _ 9 O r y N 2 � V0 4 L q 6 L vv av uo a'c L ^ j d � c dE ^ F' t q r` cu nr v�o C q E t f ^ ^u �d ` d O � nd dr 46 N n c T ^_ O — S �V M L d C C y C O^ L G ` O d� � a r C ^ C Y No O N d � �yno o u P t u O O t C d r�— Y V V y S E T D V V O Lorca n El — MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1983 TO: Chairman and Members of the Nanning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 1OU35 - R.". AJJUULIR M3 - A residentaa su division o. acres of sand :nte 8 custom lots in the R -1 -12 zone located south and east of Redhill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN 20i- 101 -37 & 207- 092 -10. BACKGROUND: As the Commission will recall, this item was rescheduled from the August 10, 1983 Planning Commission meeting to allow the applicant, R.H. Associates, time to respond to several Ccrimission concerns. The concerns included access to adjacent property to the south and the appropriateness of the project design relative to the shape and topography of the site The Resolution of Approval with conditions, staff report, and minutes from Planning Commission meeting of March 25, 1981, at which the tract map was originally approved, are attached for your review. In addition, a letter from the applicant in response to the Commission's concerns is provided. ANALYSIS: Both issues brought up at the August 10, 1983 Planning Commission meeting were discussed at the public hearing when the map was originally approved. Regarding the project design, the Commission discussed methods to preserve the natural topography to the extent possible. To accomplish this, grading on individual lots will be minimized when the street is constructed. Each home within the tract must be reviewed by the Design Review Committee and split level housing designs and raised foundations will be required where necessary to I reduce the amount of cut and fill. Alternative housing styles such as clustered units were not considered at the hearing. The General Plan designates the property as low Density Residential (2 -4 du/ac). The minimum lot size for conventional single family homes in this category is 7200 square feet, whereas the lots within the proposed tract range from 12,000 to 27,900 square feet. ITEM N Time Extension - Tentative Tract 10035 September 14, 1 °83 Page 2 Regarding access to the southerly properties, the Commission was interested in the possibility of providing a road frM the pro .ject site to Foothill Boulevard. However, it was brought up that such a road would most likely exceed the maximum permitted grade of 12 to 14 percent, and that a direct connection between the commercial property to the south and the Redhill residential area was undesirable from a planning perspective. The property south of Tentative Tract 10035, west of the railroad tracks, and north of Foothill Boulevard (Exhibit "D") will be landlockL-0. Information front the latest assessor roles indicates that parcels 13 and 31 are owned by the same party. Therefore, the appropriate agreements can be provided to permit access to Foithili Boulevard from parcel 13. Regarding the time extension, tentative tracts in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are valid for a maximmn of Four years with appropriate extensions per the Subdivision Map Act. This tract was originally appr.,ved for twelve mouths on March 25, 1981 and subsequently granted an eighteen month extension. If the Commission choses to approve the applicant's request, a final extension of eighteen (18) months may b granted. RECOKMENDAT/ON: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and material relative to this prciect. A Resolution of approval is provided should the extension. Respjful jy slu I`ted, F � p6� Rick Gomez City Planner RG:C3:jr Commission decide to grant the Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location, Map Exhibit "B" - Zoning & General Plan Exhi�it "CO - Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Assessor's Parcel Map Letter fr—n Property Owner in Response to Commission Concerns Resolution of Appczval with Conditions Planning Commission Minutes - March 25, 1981 Time Extension Resolution of ApproVLl LIZ C El d: _. �, .. �" ,`; s. CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGrp PLANNING DIVISION tom.. ►�:.r� � _- 1/ NORTH L � \ IN vr ; �1 f s 1 ,` � '�' • r tv� yr ' y _ Y 11 y h i § a � C Ulk 1 � � l xs ,` � '�' • r tv� yr ' y _ Y 11 y h i § a � C Ulk 1 � � a I iL 0 11 it; illV tp to ,...,Y3 •�,� .rte, .u: �M' � IRfY� +� i h� ♦ �.. uvn �V14� u I s . 95 RIP I i w� z. r � a ea _ `�� �i r' 0 i �o ar id z '° �15 ♦ 1 •N ♦ � 1100 °1 `�� �i r' 0 i �o ar id z '° �15 •N ♦ � 1100 °1 `1;• I � I , ) /'� 7 t lac For S.E. 114 S.E 114 S?c.vT. IS R 7W S &B. aM. Ronc RpAin. Tax 1501 t tP Poi Red Hsi; Sub.�.B. 21133 — Por Cuccr -W Fruit lands M8 4/9 Pa- Cucnnonpa Viney_^.d Tact Sett -B• MB 20145 CLUB elc, 4© ` kr p • `�.' 2 'l 2: }KI 7 / ._ °sac.- PocA.o�' 1' • Assessor: Note- ASSessora Blk 8 La+ - - Bxk 207 _ - Montses Starve in Crcbs. San agm ROSS CITY CiU t•m Tr wst RANCHO CUCAMONGA T =: MLMo � PLANNING DIVLS N EXHIBrF. a SCALE ••- 1t s OF F',�i�i� �tt�nr "OR GA i.;'1f 1lT`i i,F F rPKN''T LIFPT. AUG Z 6 1983 Ty PF,i August ?a, 1983 �,8�9,�iFll�tli1,2i3►�i5�6 a Mr. Richard Gomez City Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Reference: Tentative Tract Map #10035 Dear Mr. Gomez: We Durchased the referenced property in April 1983. Prior to acquiring the property we contacted members of the planning staff on more than one occasion to discuss the status of the property and the procedure for obtaining a time extension for the tentative tract. We were informed that there should be no problem obtaining an extension and all that would be necessary was to send a letter requesting the extension with the fee of $62.00. The pro- perty had been through the whole legal process including public hearings, and the approval of the tentative tract map was granted unanimously. Since there have been no ® changes in the circumstances and factor: affecting the i+ tract and conditions imposed thereon, we can't see what will be gained by going through the process again. It is our intention and hope that we can carry forward with the Project precisely as approved in March 1981. We strongly feel the appropriate utilizat`.on of the property is single family housing which conforms to the City's general plan. We are planning to complete the project using minimum grading, split level architecture and utili- zing the natural terrain and contours. Apparently, the question of access to an adjacent 8 acre parcel has resurfaced. We understand that this was dis- cussed in considerable deta_l in 1981 and determined not to be feasible. At this time it would be more inappropriate to require access through a single family residential deve- lcnment in that the adjacent property under the revised general plan map is now commercial. It would seem to be contrary to good planning principles to have direct access to commercial property through residential. R. Gomez, City Planner City of Cucamonga - 8/24/83 Page Two In conclusion, we sincerely hope agree to an exter.tion and concur findings when the tract map was you for your consideration. R. H.? SSOCIATES W. G. Jackson, Partner WGJ:nb cc: Bill Beverly that this commission will with the prior commission's unanimously approved. Thank 11 11 2 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -34 ® A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO APPROVING MO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP INO. 10035ONDITIONALLY WHEP.EAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10035, hereinafter "Map" submitted by The Developers, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Ber�ardina, State of California, described aF a custom lot subdivision of 15.7 acres of land in the r -1 -i2 zrne, located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN 207- 10' -37 and 207 - 092 -10 into 38 lots, regularlj came before the Planning Cominiss:on for public hearing and action on March 25, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: . in regard to T ive TractaNO ?ng0035 Con-misSion the Maps following findings thereof (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivisioil is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is nct likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through Or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Page 2 . _.. .. �► (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the envi'romm�ent and'a Negative Declaration is, issued. SECTION 'L: Tentative Tract Map No. 10035, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hurcuy approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard ConditiL.;S: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Prior to final map recordation, appropriate provisions shall be made for the disposition and /or maintenance of areas adjacent to the two existing single family residences on Red Hill Country Club Drive which are not needed for right -of -way purposes. Such provisions shall be approved by the City Engineer and the City Planner. ^c. If this tract is to be developed as a cusrnm lot subdivision, the precise design and placement of all s ructures on all lots shall be subject to approval by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Appropriate restrictions to this effect shall be recorded along with the final map. 3. The Building Official shall critically review the structural integrity of each unit in this tract as it relates to seismic safety. If, in the opinion of the Building official, additional structural elements are needed, then they shall be so required. ENGINEERING DIVISION 4. Prior to final map recordation, the precise alignment of Camino Predera at Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be revised to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Installation of a stormdrain system from existing inlet at Red Hill Country Club Drive to the existing inlet structure at Cucamonga Creek Channel including dedication of easements shall be required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. All existing easements lying within the future right -of- way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. 7. Fina'i plans and profiles shall show the location of any existing utility facility that would affect construction. E RP Resolution No. 81 -34 Page 3 8. Adequate provisions shall be made frr acceptance and diSDCSal of surface - drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 9. Private drainage easements with improvements for cross lot drainage where required shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. 10. Sewage for lots 1 -21 shall be accomplished in common and maintained by C.C. & R.'s by the developer prior to the release of all improvement_ bonds for the tract or other alternatives to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Building Official. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: j✓' SPCretary of the Pianzn ng Commis I, JACK ;AM, Secretary cf`the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Tolstoy, King, Rempel, Dahi NOES: COt/MISS1ONERS: Mone ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject: - Applicant:_ - �s Location: �Ga:t -fr �+u'J �`�'.' _+:..� 6= a:�c�i "��� :.�Z `�✓ !i�� /"rte. _ Those itoms checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development _ I. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of -- approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3_ Approval of this request shall not waive compliance wit!i all sections of the Zo-iing Ordina -ce and all other applicable City O-dinances in effect -at time of Building Permif.issuance. ✓f4. The develcper shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recrea Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Divisior. 5. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foct high masonry vall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Locatioa shall be subject to a}p. oval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings ::re .to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazaraous ", the root materials must_ be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Divis on prior to issuance of a building pe.-mit. _ 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for -- review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 9. Ali roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. �IG. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being co-,=enced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Comunity Development. 1 M 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Divisior prior to issuance of building pen lcs. Such platy shall . indicate style, illumirat-on, location, height and method of . sh4 e7.ing. M_ iigh *_ing ;hall adverse ?y affect adjacent properties_ 12. All swiTgmipc pools installed at the time of initial development shall ` be solar heated. - 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. 14. m All trash pick up shall be for individua ils with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the _ City Planner and Building t_fficial prior to :,ccupancy of tY,e first unit. lb. All buildings numbers and -;-.Iulividual units shall be identified in a _ clear and concise manner, inciuding proper illumination. - 17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolls and locks sha-1 be ' installed on each unit in this project. _ 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed or. each-unit. 19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. 20. Energy conserving building materia's and appliances are required to be i-ncorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, duub ?e paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. 21. This development shall Drovide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating u_rit. L_. Emergency secondary access shah be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 2.3. L, -al and vaster Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance wi ti: the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Lorna. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, =ximum stones, physical condition. fencing and weed control in accordance with city equestrian trail - :andards_shail be- submitted to and approved by the City P'.anner prior to approval and recordation of the final map_ - 24. Phis tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equ= striar, trails. - M C. 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management_ Ordinance. Affordability shall be Catermined by currc. :t market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction df the` project. Proof �f this provision - shali be submitted to the Planning Division, prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. _ Parkinq and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islancs shaii have a minimum inside dimension of and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. _ 2. Parking lot trees shall be a mini.*:;um 15 gallon. si-e. 3. All two -wav aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with oothill Fire District requirements. _ S. All parking spaces shall be do.:ble striped. 5. Ali units shall be provided with aito,natic garage door openers. _ 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. S. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle sc.irce of transportation for the otiiner. _ 9. No parking shail be permitted within the interior cirulafion aisle other than in designated v;sif parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Pianning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Landscaoinq 11 1. A de tailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Divisicn prior to the issuance of building permits. _/I 2. Existing trees shall be re wined wherever possible. A master pian of existing trees showing their precise loc.tion, size and type shall be- co.pieted by the develuper. Siiid plan sh3li take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. L J 11 E 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed anu topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of th^ Planning Divisio., during the review of the master Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree -for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. f� 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be instilled 'in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' or interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20b -24" box or larger, 70%-15 gallon, and 10%-5 gallon. 6. A11 landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. f 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate_ shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shat' be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buver. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory conditiun. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of yradis'9 or an alternative method of erosion. control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on o :_tcm lot subdivisions shall be provided to geminate the seed and to a Joint 6 months after germination. 8- All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall ::e fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acce;:table to the City. Such proof of - aintes:ance -shall he submitted to the City Prior to issuance of building pErmits. g. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed uy the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The final desion of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be"nbject to approval by the Planning Division. 11. A minimum. of specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. 12. Special landscape fertures such as rounding, aileivial rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along u D. Sicns Any signs prc ,sed for this development shail be designed in conformance with the Cr,-- ;ensive Sign, Ordinance and shall require review and approva� by the nlani' -. Division prior to instaliation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to t��- Plannirg Division for their review and acorovai prior to issuance of Building permits. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Aoorovals Recuired I. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. _ 2. Director Review shall be accompiished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. _ 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance / Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Jse Permit is gran,tad for a period rf month(s) at which tire the Planning Comimission may add or delete con itions or re-oke the Conditional Use Permit. 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail, on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the hor.} iccated on Lot , Tract , on ' I have read the C.C. & R.'s and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of ailowi.ng equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purcoaser Said statement is to be fi7ad by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. 1/ 6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building per.-nits, when no subdivision map is involved, writter certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Co=unity Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of acccrmodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (601/ days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. p 7. V8. V� 9. l� r Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance- of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available: to serve the.proposed project, shall be ssubmiitted to,thhe 'Department of Community Development. Such letter %..: the water district within sixty (50) days prior to final map approval in t,9 case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of ail other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities ailoviable by the Santa Ara Regional :dater Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within t::elve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. This subdivision was not sumitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to tinai approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. _ Di.ISIt0i1 FOR COMPLIANT- Lds;h TIE FOLLOWING APPLICANT S` HALL CO;ITACT THE BUILDI7'i "' � �. CONDITIONS: F. Site Develo =ment X//I. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, " "f , Mechanical Code Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and rn c all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time ov approve of this project. Y 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shill be submitted to the FoothiiI District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. !/ 3, Prior to the issuance of a buiining permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to ar existing unit(s), the applicant. shall pay development fees 'at the estabiished rate. `_tech fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development FQe, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. q. Pri-Q,r to the issuance of a building permit for a new Cc=e;ciai or industrial deveiopment or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established ra: °. Such fees may include, but not be iimiCed to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit ar..i Plan Checking Fees. S. This approval shall beco —me null and void if huil;irg permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date c, project approval. tf o. Street names and addresses shall be prodded by the building official. E G. H. � y/ .ma - T Dwelling pits sha77 be constructed with fire retardant material and non- combustible roof material„ _ 8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street uogrde with additional wood trim around :•jindo:s and wood si:iag or pian -ons where appropriate. Existinq Structures _ ?. Provide compliance with th= Uniform Cui7ding Code `or property line clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. _ 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be rrmoved, filled and /or cape -d to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Coda. Gradinc Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance witn the Uniform Building Code. City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in sutstantial conformance with the — approved conceptual grzdirg Man. -w,Z2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shalt be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. t%4. The final grading plan shall be subject tT review and approval by the Planning, Engineering_and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building ?e—mit whichever comes first.. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE NGINEERI?iG DIV?SION F0 COMFLIANCE :dITr THE FOLL9RING CO ?+DITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access — t,/ 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary easements as sown on the tentative map_ 2. Dedication shall be made of the followi..g missing righ s -of -way on the folio: fin. streets: _ additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on L 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as V 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. _ 6. Adeq::at2 prV:isio:.s s::a'.'. be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for llelivery of gooas to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. 0. Street T.mvrovements Y I. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited tc, curb ano gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. Y 2. Construct the follo:cing missing improvements including, but not limited to: CURB & A.C_ SIDE- DRIVE STREET I A-C. i WHEEL STREET NXIE GUTTER ?Viii _ ; WALK APPR_ LIGHTS OVERLAY ] CHAiP. RA MI CTHER 1% 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment hermit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. , IZ 4. Street iaprovement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 5. Sure y shall be posed and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer ar., the Cites Attorney, guaranteeing conPletion of the public ' improvements, prior to recording of the map or Lire issuance of building permits, whizhever comes first. 6. All street_ improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of-the City Engineer, prior to occupancy- 7. ,,cnt striping, marking, traffic and sheet name signing shall be installed _ - per the recuirements of the City Engineer.- K: Drainaoe and Flood Control L%' 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer- _ 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood insurance Program and is subject to the provisions -of the program and City Ordinance No. 24- 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as r*ajor water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street ccnnecticns, flood protection walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and-rolled driveways at property line. L. Utilities - t� 1. All proposed utilities within, the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. - v 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. ./ 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required: r 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern. California Edison Company and City standards. t/ S. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County 'dater District (CLIM) , Foothill Fire District and the,Environ-nental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino- A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior• to recordation - i r 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other tnterested agencies involved- Approval of the final :nap will be subjec_ to any requirements that may be received from them. _ M. General Rec.:ire -ants and Aooro•:als - 1. Per-,its fro-, other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: 6- County Dust Abate-rent trequired prior to issuance of d grading perm ►�C. San Eernard.no County Flood Control - District 1 /0- Other:�.�1}S�r%i` r'�-• •;L • ��Pc'2�j 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and ?estrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map at :d a copy provided to the City. ® 3. Prior to recordation, a Tlotice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. I r 10:00 p.m. The Planning Commission Recessed 10:22 p.m. The Planning Commission Reconvened F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10035 - fHE DEVELOPERS - A residential subdivision of 15.7 acres of land into 38 custom lots -�' in the R -1 -12 zone located east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south r of Calle Corazon - APN 202 - 111 -19. Barry Hagan, City Planner, - eviewed the staff report. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Rougeau how the City guarantees that i there will not be slope failure such as had occurred in Orange County. Mrs Rcu- zu replied that there are ac- b.z:rartees; however, the land below had been analyzed and has soils reports and there was not any reason to believe t.,at this land would be difi rent. 1 Mr. Hogan stated that it must b= remembered that thi; is contour grading and it is minimal. Further, t. .t th. area is not known for unstable slopes whereas Orange County had a ?-eat deal of cut and fill slopes. He indicated that in the area in Laguna where the slopes failed a study was done and there had been no record of instability in that area either. He indicated that grading would be at a minimum and design review would take place on each and every house with a required soils report for this project. Chairman Dahl opened the public bearing. Mr. Roger Muir, partner and designer of this project gated that i was in basic agreemen with the conditions but wanted clarification that this was a 38 lot subdivision as he hzd noted clerical discrepancies in the number of lots in this project. He al.;o indicated that Alternative "C" would be their choice in dealing with z triangular piece of land in trans- ferring it at na cost to tare exist'sg property owners. Commissioner Sceranka asked if there would be an increased assessment_ ir. doing this. Mr. Muir indicated that the property would be transferred at zero value and would therefrre not add anything substantial to the assessment. Commissioner Sceranka stated that for the record, the property would be assessed at fair market value and would add more to the assessment than if the property were not transferred. Mr. Mti ?r stated that there were several items in the conditions on which he would like to have clarification. He was concerned with item 4 and the requirement for adequate side yard for storage of recreational vehicles, etc. He stated that since these were large lots, he felt that this condition is covered and additionally, that these lots would come under critical architectural review. Planning Commission Minutes -16- March- 25, 1981 (I I_ Mr. Hogan explained the requirements wer_ part of a newly adopted ordinance reauirirg side yard setbacks and was written to preclude the storage of recreational vehicles on the st -eet. Mrs. Betty McNay, Rarchc Cucamonga resident, addressed the Commission and indicated that : :e was neither in favor of or opposed to this project; however, ,he was concerned about entry into an 8 acre parcel of land that she craned near this project and the drainage problem that presently exists. She indicated :hat the County Flood Control District has not done anything to alleviate the problem thus far and if something was not done this might result 5� a lake. She also cites: concerns about the steep road for access co her property. Following discusE;cn between staff and the Commission, Mr. Rougeau stated that because of improveLierts that would be made by this project there will be less water then there is n n:. Mr. Wally Schults, 8513 Red Hill Country Club Drive, Let 11, expressed a number of concerns regarding the •-fight -of -way proposed by this project near the corner of his tome which would not afford protection as it angles through the lot; the 14 -15% grade from Red Hill Country Club Drive on the southwest corner of this property; and the necessity of street improvements. Mr. Ray Keeney, resident on Calle Cora -on, stated that he was not for or against this project but asked if his view would be blocked by some type, of wall. Mrs. Ada Cooper, 8520 Red Hill Coun:cy Clnb Drive, stated that she was concerned about access from the pro! used road. She indicated that -ten she purchased her property io 1941, Mr. Kramer who owned most of the land, guaranteed that a road would be put in and it n-ver was. She spoke also for a Mrs. Mandella in stating that she eLjoys her view and would not like to see condominLums built here. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Ring asked if there _aa something in the zoning ordinance that precludes excesses of a 10% grade. Mr. Rougeau stated that it speaks of a 12 -14% grade maximum; however, for s..orr distances such a grade would be .r..cceptable. Commissioner King asked what the grade was on the road that goes up Cucamonga Canyon. Commissioner Tempel ixplained where the 15% grades were. Commissioner Sceranka asked why the proposed road in this development is going up through Red Hill instead of cutting down towards Foothill. Planning Comsission Minutes -17- March 25, 1981 Mr. Rougeau explained that for it to go down would require even steeper grades and that the vacant land was left on this property to provide for a road connection and to provide access to other pieces of property. Commissioner Sceranka asked why the road could not go in to the south. Mr. Hogan stated that access is needed where the road is proposed. Mr. Hogan ;Mated that from a Planning point of view it connects property that shout,. __t be connected. Further, that it should not direct traffic tbaough CL. mercial ventures. Chairman Dahl asked if this area would be included in the Foothill study. Mr. Horan replied that it would. Commissioner Sceraroka asked where the property was going to drain and if this would be under the railroad tracks. Mr. Rougeau replied that the storm drain goes under the easement into Cucamonga Creek. He indicated that drainage would be improved .n that most of the water will go into the new .asement and not into tht channel. There was discussion on the condition requiring an easement from the Southern Pacific Railroad. Commissioner King asked if Design Review for lots 1 -9 and 14 -16 would be appropriate or whether Design Review ='aculd include all lots relative to view obstruction. Mr. Hogan replied that he .was going to suggest Design Review for all lots. ^Owmissioner Rempel stated that relative to the comment on fills, there are some fills where the condominiums are on Red Hill but he stated that all the foundations on the Red Hill side go down to the natural. He further stated that one group of lots was fill put in by :Kramer Nursery and -s not compacted. He indicated that the County Building Department required it to be removed and put back in properly. There were further comments relative to soil stability by the Commission. ?'r. Hogar, replied to the Commission's concerns by stating that Condition C7 would take care r this. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by T_olstoy, carried unanim-3usly, that the Resolution be adopted c th an amendment to Section 2, Planning Division, *;o. 2, and for items 14 -16, all lots have the addition of a condition on sewage so that each lot will not have to be pumped out individually but that there be some kind of community sewer pump to bring this up from the lower area designed into the tract. Planning Coamission Minutes -15- March 25, 1887 i Mr. Hogan stated that this motion should be 1 -21 shall have a ^ewer in common and prior AOL bo:_ds for this tract tuis or another altern the City Engineer and the Building Official C reworded ti indicate tha: lots to the release of all improve:aent alive that is satisfactory to shall be met. Commissioner Sceranka stated that condition No. 3 should indicate that buffering will be provided for unit No. 11 to the access point. Commissioner Tolstoy indicated that this should be provided for unit No. 11 as well. Mr. Pogan stated that he wished to inform the Commission that in order to take care of the sewer in ccsmon it would have to be handled through C.C. S R's. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: SCERANKA, TOLST_OY, KING, RErTEL, DAHL NOM CommlSSION —ERS: NONE - carried- Commissioner T.ls:.oy asked if since the Commission was coming back tomorrow night would there be any objection to adjouraing and taking up the ether items at this next meeting. Chairman Dahl stated that Items G, H, and I would rave to be dealt with. G. ENVIRON*1ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP N0. 6761 - CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS - A residential subdivision of 18.7 acres into 2 parcels in the R -1 zone located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Carnelian Street - APN 201- 21= -05 Mr. Hogan explained that net all the requirements fox legal advertising for this item had been met and so the item should be re:oved from this agenda. Motion: Moved by Tempel, seconded by Tolstoy, carried unanimously, to remove this item from this agenda. H. PARCEL MAP NO. 6725 - DAON CORPIRATION - A commercial subdivision of 176.86 acres into 10 parcels in the M -2 zone located east of Haven Avenue on the south side c Foothill - APN 108 - 351 -03, 13. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by King, carried unanimously, to continue this item to the April 8, 1981 meeting. Planning Commission Minutes -19- marcl, 25, 1981 RESOLUTION NO. i - 5` A RESOLUTION OF THE'RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACf 10035 LOCATED SOUTH AND EAST OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SOUTH OF CALLE CORAZON WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extensio^ for the above - described project, pursuant to Section, 1.401.11.2 of Ordinance 28 -B, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Punning Commission conditionally approved the abovE- described Tantatise Tract Map. SECTIOR 1. The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to record the Tract at this time. C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would! not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code. D. That the granting of said tirre extension Will not be detrimental to the public healt;i, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to provesties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: time extension for: TRACT 10035 The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a APPLICANT R.H. Associates EXPIRATION March 25, 1985 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA B: Dennis L. S tout, Chairr„an ATTEST: _ Secretary of the P arming Commission L. 1' Resolution No. Page 2 11 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Ci Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Pesolution regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coen City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ft a regular meeting of the Planning Cc on the 14th day of SeptemQar, 1483, by the following vote -to -wit; AYES: COMMISSIONER.: NOES: COMMISSIONER;: ABSEN'i : COMMISSIONER is Ll