HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983/09/28 - Agenda Packet,.
;,
T"� c=
:... r ,.
`,
��1� ��Y�
4
;.,,
� ;, t-•
r r..
"�
`�
k,
���
�:
r, ,�..
� w
►-.,
•
;�
�
.-- � �
: a
�
„
� „
Y
`
\\
t,
'.�
.
��� �,. t
I
*v
tV�M1
'
`
\r'
> i
�
`
,�
_♦ ' ep�a,
"
�.
�l .
ll �
�
�
H
R
l���
%4 f F1'C L:i 1
�~
� -
y r
> �
� ..
fi
�1
-J. ,.
.y
a c ;`
� r
� ( -
/ .' ,.`
�
/ - + � •e.
r,
}+ 4 ,"
. - _...
"-
.��
.�
r
�.
a
�f Jy �
r
1
'1
l
♦ A
l
n�.
1
Y � .. J, ..
�
_ ���
��•�
i
;,
.lu- �� .
,.
' J .r ^:
�
I �
,} `
_1
Win'
• -
,• .�.
ICI'
y.. �.,
1
I.
;.
a
YT ii.l1
_'
J H
l ��
�'
..
_ l
{[I
{ �
y r j
l � V.C.
F..RS.-
V� ' "�
..
�SY .:
- ... �',�
* �<
A C T I O N
J("� -(J�
CrrY OF
RANMO CUCAIVION'Ia-k
Regular Meetieg
WEDWESDsAY September 28, 1483 ' -,00 P.M.
LIONS PARK COMMUNITf CENTER
9151 BAS-9 LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
L Pledge of Allegiance
IL 8011. can
Commissioner Barker X
Commissioner Juarez X
Commissioner McNfel X
IV. Approval of Minutes
APPROVED August 24, 1483
3 -0 -0 -2
V. Consent Calendar
Commissioner Rempel - X
Commissioner Stout _x
Tae following Consent Calendar items are w pected to be routine
and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at
one time without discussion. If anyone has c ct r.i over any item,
it should be removed for disctssior-
APPROVED 5 -0 A.
TIVE
--- • � -'L LN %JcLvur - a mange of zone from R -1 and
R-1 -S to R -3 PD or total planned development of 80 single
family attached units on 10.1 acres of land generally located
on the 'west side of Ramona at Monte Vista Avenue - APN
202- 181 -05, 06 and 16.
B. TIME Els"TENSION FOR CONDIYiONAL USE PERMIT 82 -03 -
.?OBTH RK_ the development of a church acility on 3.3
acres of land m the it-1 zone, located on the east side of
Haven, south of Highland - APN 202 - 641 -24.
Planning Commission Agenda
September 28, 1983
Page 2
VL Public Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which concerned
irAividuaLs may voice their opinion of the :dated project. Please
wait to be recognized by the Chairman and addre� the Commission
by stating your narne and address. All suds opinions shall be
limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project.
NOntFtcn 4_1_0 C. CONNSIDERAiiON OF REVOCATION OR MODIFICATION TO
to reduce hours to PERATING CONDITIONS FOR CONDMONAL USE
11
P.M. PERMIT 78-03 - BOARS HEAD - This is a review of potential
operational mod icataons to the conditions of approval which
are intended to resolve complaints and disturbances created
by this establishment. The business is within the Rancho
Plaza located on the northwest corner of Carnelian and 19th
Street.
APPROVED 5 -0 D. CONDITIONAL USE PERNUT° 82 -18 - HOWARD - The revision
to alloy construction to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit for First
of build -ing to begin. Assembly of God Church for the development of a 9430 sq. ft.
Grading Plan and Site building on 5.5 acres of land ir. the R- 1- 20,000 zone, located
Plan to be submitted at the northeast corner of Archibald and Wilson Avenues -
to P.C. for final APN 201 - 381 -01.
approval 10- 26 -83.
E. VARIANCE 83 -04 - ROBERTS - A request to reduce the
APPROVED 5 -0 front, rear, and side yard setbacks on a 3,280 square foot lot
in the R -3 vane located at the northeast corner of Ametnyst
and Monte Vista, 6969 Amethyst - APN 202 - 131 -04.
DENIED - 4-1 -0 F, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -04 A - CARNELLAN
INVESTMENTS - A request to amend the General Plan Land
Use Plan ram Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) to Medium
Residential (4-14 du/ac) on approximately 7 acres of land in
the R -1 -85C zone (R -3 pending) located on the south side of
Highland, be.>veen Jasper and Carnelian - APN 201 - 214 -08.
DENIED 4-1 -0 G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT I.ND ZONE CHANGE 83-03
- CARNELIAN INVESTMF :'M - A change oY zone from
- 1-8500 to 11-3 jMultsp�e Family Residential) on
approximately 7 acres of land located on the south side of
Highland, between Jasper and Carnelian- APN 201 - 214 -08.
CONTINUED 70
Ts ER 26, 1983
H. GENERAL PLAN
Use Plante Office to Neighborhood Commercial on 5.44
acres of land located at the northeast corner of Archibald and
Base Line - APN 202 - 181 -27.
Planning Commission Agenda
September 28, 1983
Page 3
CONTINUED 2 ?0
OCTTOBER 2 L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 83 -04
0, 7983 B - SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS - A change of zone from A -P
Administrative Professional) to C -1 (Neighborhood
Commercial) on 5.44 acres of land located at the northeast
corner of Archibald an3 Base Line - APN 202 - 181 -27.
DENIED 5 -0 J. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83-04 C - ACACIA - A
request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from
Office to Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du/ac) on 3.58
acres of land located on the west side of Archibald, north of
Base Line - APN 202 - 151 -83.
APPROVED 5 -0 K. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81 -02 -
ANDERSON -'The development of a retail center on 1.5 acres
o ,.and m the C -1 zone to be located at the northwest corner
of Arrow Route and Turner - APN 208 - 321 -32. (Continued
from Planning Commission meeting of August 24, 1983.)
`dLNL Public Comments
This is :he time a ed place for the general public to address the
Commission. items to be discussed here are those which do not
already appear on this agenda.
12:25 a.m. '1. Adjournment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations
that set an 11 pm. adjournment time. If items gu beyond that
time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the
Commission. The Planning Commission will adjourn to a
Development Code Pubic Hearing to be held on October 4, 1983 at
Lims Park Community Center, 91 61 Base Line, Rancho
Cucamonga.
ly � x
WARM IMTERNATCXAL AMVMr
CITY OF RAMCM CU JJAO""
AWN
R
W ,. .
L Pledge of Allegiance
II, Roll Call
Commissioner Barker_
Commissioner Juarez
Commissioner McNie1—
III. Announcements
IV_ Approval of Minutes
August 24, 1983
V. Consent Calendar
Commissioner Rempel
Commissioner Stout
The following Consent C4lendzr items are expected to be routine
and r -n- controversial. :hey will be acted on by the Commission ct
one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item,
it should be removed for discussion.
A. TINTE
TE N'I'A
4 -
L••= �n.,vr - �, crsaage of zone tram R -1 and
R -1 -5 to -%-3/PD or total ^?alined 1eveiopment of 80 single
family attached units on iiD.1 acres- A land generally iocated
on the west side of Ramona at ML ite Vista Avenue - APN
202 - 181 -05, 06 and 16.
B. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERIVIIT 82-031
NORTHIiIRK The development o a church facility on 37
acres of land in the zone, located on the east side of
Haven, south of Highland - APN 202- 641• -24.
CITY OF
�NNNL a catiL vISS1a
�Z
AGE"-MA
v tl
L
V
1977
1
Regular Mectind
WEDNESDAY September 28, 198.'. 7:00 P.M.
LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
9161 BASE LINE? RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOR --RA
L Pledge of Allegiance
II, Roll Call
Commissioner Barker_
Commissioner Juarez
Commissioner McNie1—
III. Announcements
IV_ Approval of Minutes
August 24, 1983
V. Consent Calendar
Commissioner Rempel
Commissioner Stout
The following Consent C4lendzr items are expected to be routine
and r -n- controversial. :hey will be acted on by the Commission ct
one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item,
it should be removed for discussion.
A. TINTE
TE N'I'A
4 -
L••= �n.,vr - �, crsaage of zone tram R -1 and
R -1 -5 to -%-3/PD or total ^?alined 1eveiopment of 80 single
family attached units on iiD.1 acres- A land generally iocated
on the west side of Ramona at ML ite Vista Avenue - APN
202 - 181 -05, 06 and 16.
B. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERIVIIT 82-031
NORTHIiIRK The development o a church facility on 37
acres of land in the zone, located on the east side of
Haven, south of Highland - APN 202- 641• -24.
Planning Commission A�Pnd
F_ptember 28, 1983
Page 2
VL Public Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which concerned
individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please
wait to be recoanized by the Chairman and address the Commission
by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be
limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project.
C. CONSIDERATION OF REVOCATION OR MODIFICATIO
FEI: LXUF 76 -U3 - 13UAHJ iti:.Au -'finis is a review or poLenum
operational modifications to the conditions of approval which
are i.-.tc ^ded to resolve complaints and disturbances created
by this establishment. The business is within the Rancho
Plaza located on the northwest corner of Carnelian and 19th
Street.
D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -18 - HOWARD -The revisior
to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit for First
Assembly of God Church for the of a 9400 sq. ft.
building on 5.5 acres of land in the R- i- 20,000 zone, located
at the northeast corner of Archibald and Wilson Avenues -
APN 201- 381 -01. .
E. VARIANCE 83 -04 - ROBERTS _1 A request to reduce the
front, rear, and side yard setbacks on a 3,280 square foot lot
in the R -3 zone located at the northeast corner of Amethyst
and Monte Vista, 6969 Amethyst - APN 202 - 131 -04.
F. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -04 A - CARNELIAN
INVEST_vl£NTS - A request to amend the General Plan Land
Use Plan from Low Residential (2 -4 dulac) to Medium
Residential (4-14 du /ac) v wr.*ox-imately 7 acres of land in
the R -1 -8500 zone (R -3 pending) located on the south side of
Highland, between Jasper and Carnelian - APN 201- 214 -08.
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE
- C:AKNELlAN 1NVE5y hN'i'J - A cnange oz zone from
R -1 -8500 to R -3 i= ?1`dtip3e Family Residential) on
approximately 7 acres of land located on the south side of
Highland, between Jasper and Carnelian - APN 201 - 214 -08.
H. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -04 B - SYCAMORE
INVESTMENTS - A request to amend use General Plan Land
Use Plan from Office to Neighborhood Commercial on 5.44
acres of land located at the northeast corner of Archibald and
Base Line - APN 202 -181 -27.
W -
L
September ,3 Agenda
2819813
Page 3
N-- SYCAMORE _ - --
Administrative - Profession to C -1 (Neighborhood
corner of la or. 5. and Base Linen - APti located
2U 131- 27northeast
us-n4 C - ACACIA - A
reouest to -.,tend the Cenerel Plan Lane L = °- .
Office to Medi;z:«-ri:gh Residential. (14 -24 duln-) on 3.58
acr3s of land located on the west side of Archibald, north of
5sse Line - APN 202- 151 -83.
1rij. Director's aePor+=
K. V1.1E EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81 -02 -
yNDERSON - The development of a retail center on 1.5 acres
of land in the C -1 zone to be located at the norichwest corner
of Arrow Route and Turner - APN 208- 321 -32. Continued
from Pla u itg Commission meeting of August 24, 1983.)
Vim,, public Comments
Tnis is the time and place for the general public to address the
Commission Items to be discussed here are those which do not
already arpear on this agenda.
IX. Adjournment
The Planning CommLSicn has adopted Administrative Regulations
';-t set en 11 p.m. adjournment Lime. If items go beyond
time, they shall be heard only wiL'a the consenL 01 toUte
a
Commission. The planning Commission will adjourn
Development Code Public Hearing to be held on Octobee'4, Ilan ho
Lions Park Community Center, 5161 Ease
r„t,nmonaa.
o TARM •MltRMArW,� Ativvr
CITY OF RAHCM Ci1CA&40*4"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
August 24, 1983
Chairman Dennis Stout called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was heid at
the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Chairman Stc.it then ied in the pledge to the fiag.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: David Barker, Addie Juarez, Dennis Stout
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Larry McNiel, Herman Rempel
STAFF PRESENT: Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer; Rick Gomez, City
Planner; Bill Holley, Community Services Director; Edward
Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Jack Lam, Community
Development Director; Janice Reynolds, Secretary
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Juarez, carried, to adopt the Minutes of
August 10, 1983 with an amendment to page one. The amendments were to reflect
the attendance of Assistant City Attorney, Edward Hopson, at that meeting and
that Item B was removed from the Consent Calendar rather than Item A.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Rick Gomez, City Planner, announced that there would be a Foothills Community
Plan meeting on August 30, 1983 at 7:00 in the Lions Park Community Center
Forum_ Mr. Gomez advised that this would be a meeting between the Planning
Commission and the County staff to discuss recommendations which would be
forwarded from the Commission to the City Council.
CONSENT CALENDAR
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR .HVELOPMENT °,£VIEW 0.3 -23 - TI OLLER - The
development of two distribution buildings 50,080 and 45,233 sq. ft.)
on 13.68 acres of land in' the Industrial Park and General Industrial
areas (Subareas 6 & 10) located on the north side of Acacia Street at
Utica Avenue - APN 209 -401 -2 & 3.
B. TRACT 9351 - LEWIS HOMES - Reapplication for design review of 42 single
family homes on 37.-8 acres of lard in the R- 1- 10,000, P. -1- 12,000 and
R -1- 20,000 zones located south of Banyan Street west of Sapphire Street.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -20 - BWLC - The
development of a 15,600 square foot industrial bui ding on acres of
land in the Ge:ieral Industrial /Rail Served category (Subarea 5) located
at 8977 Center Street - APN 209 - 242 -09 & 209 - 251 -09.
D. TIME EXTENSION FOR CUP 81 -02 - ANDERSON - The development of a retail
center of 1.5 acres of land in t e C -1 zone to be located at the
northwest corner of Arrow Route and Turner - APN 208 - 321 -32.
Commissioner Barker requested that Item D be removed from the Consent
Calendar.
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Juarez, carried, to adopt the Consent
Calendar with the removal of Item D.
D. TIME EXTENSION FOR CUP 81 -02 - ANDERSON
Commissioner Barker asked if previously approved projects in this area had
peen allowed less than the required landscaping.
Mr. Gomez replied that one project on Archibald and Arrow Route was granter
approval prior to the City's adoption of the General Plan. The General Plan
requires 45 feet of landscaping along Arrow Route.
Richard Avcnt, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission stating
that the 18 -month extension would allow the applicant time to submit a project
which would be viable.
Chairman Stout asked Mr. Avent if he had considered bringing the landscaping
requirements into conformance with the General Plan.
Mr. Avent replied that if the 45 -foot landscaping requirement of the General
Plan was worked into the project, it would result in the loss of 24 parking
spaces.
Commissioner Barker asked Mr. Avert if he would be open to the suggestion that
staff work with him to resolve the landscaping issue and try to come up with a
proposal which would be agreeable to all concerned.
Planning Commission Minutes -2- August 24, 1983
l �
Mr. Avent replied that he would.
Mot4on: moved by Barker, seconded by Juarez, carried to approve the time
extensio -, for Conditional Use Permit 81 -02 for thirty (30) days, at which time
the item would return to the Planning Commission at their September 28, 1983
meeting for consideration of further extension. Staff was directed to work
with the applicant in an effort to resolve the issues.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chairman. Stout advised that the applicant for items G and H on the agenda
requested a continuance to the September 14, 1983 Planning Commission
meeting. He requested that the items be heard at this time.
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8100 - BWLC - A division of 9.82
acres into parce.s within the C-2 an R-3 zones %cated at the
northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona. Avenue - APN
1077 - 621 - 28,31.
H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REIVEW 83 -17 - BARMAKIAN - The
development of apartment units on -776-acres in the R- zone located
on the east side of Ramona, north of Foothill - APN 1077- 621 -31 ;a
portion).
® Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There were no comment=_, therefore
the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Juarez, carried, to continue Parcel Map
8100 and Development Review 83 -17 to the Planning Commission meeting of
September 14, 1983.
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8106 - DAON CORPORTION - A
division of 7.90 acres int�arce s within Subarea 7 of the Industrial
Specific Plan area located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of
Utica Avenue - APP! 108 -052 -1 through 70.
Shintu Bose reviewed the staff report.
Jack Corrigan, Daon Corporation, addressed the Commission stating that he
agreed with the findings of the staff report and the Resolution of approval,
and advised that he would answer any questions the Comm, issicners might have.
There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed.
Planning Conmmission Minutes -3-
August 24, 1983
J
Motion: Moved by Juarez, seconded by Barker, carried, to adopt Resolution
83 -107 approving Parcel Map 8106 and the issuance of a Negative Declaration.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
JUAREZ, BARKER, STOUT
NONE
MCNIEL, REMPEL
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8060 - BARNES - A division of 1.4
acres of land within Subarea 3 of the In ust �5oecific Plan area
located at the northwest corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue - APN
1077 - 621 -28, 31.
Shintu Bose reviewed the staff report. Mr. Bose advised that the applicant
has concerns with condition number 7 of the City Engineer's Report, which is a
standard condition for all parcel maps. He further advised that staff had
suggested to the applicant that a lien agreement be used for the improvements
rather than irstalling them at this time.
Chairman Stout ope ^ed the public hearing.
Lewis Barnes, applicant, addressed the Commission stating that he would prefer
to go ahead and split the parcel as proposed and install the required 12 KW
underground cable at the time of construction on those lots. He suggested
that an assessment district be established to pay for underground cable in
this area.
Chairman Stout stated that a lien agreement is normally used by the City for
future improvements and asked if staff had explained this to him.
Mr. Barnes replied that he preferred not to have a lien attached to his
property and would not sign a lien agreement unless it was approved by his
attorney.
Chairman Stout explained that the underground installation of 12 KV cable is c
normal City policy which is required of every developer. fie further e- piained
that the City requires lien agreements as an assurance to the residents of the
City that these requirements will be met, and suggested that Mr. Barnes could
have this agreement reviewed by his attorney.
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Juarez, carried, to adopt Resolution
83 -108 approving Parcel Map 8106 with no modifications.
Planning Commission Minutes -4- August 24, 1983
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, JUAREZ, `TOUT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, REMPEL
Chairman Stour advised the applicant that the decision of the Planning
Commission is appealable to the City Council within fourteen days of this date
should his attorney advise him not to enter into a lien agreement with the
City.
DIRECTOR'S RZPORTS
I. USE DETERMTN1,TION - BLANCO INVESTMENTS - A request to determir- if a
mini- storage facility would oe considered imilar to other uses permitted
in the C -2 zone. Proposed project to be located on the southeast corner
of Hems Avenue and Hampshi °e Street.
Rick Gomez reviewed t!,e staff report explaining that this review by the
Commission was not for approval cf the project, but to gain a consensus zoof the
Planning Commission. if this type of use could be considered in the
Chairman Stout stated that this could be a permitted use, however, would
prefer to see it under the restrictions of a Conditional Use Permit.
4DThere was a consensus of the Planning Commission that a mini- storage facility
could be considered a permitted use in the C -2 zone with a Conditional Use
Permit.
7:50 - Planning Commission Recessed
2 :00 - Planning Commission Reconvened
J. HERITAGE PARK SITE PLAN REVIEW
Bill Holley, Community Services Director, presented the Heritage Park site
plan to the Planning Commission. Mr. Holley stated that the Parks Advisory
Commission provided extensive input into the site plan.
Peter Patassi addressed the Commission on behalf of the Parks Advisory
Commission expressing their support of the park plan.
Chairman Stout stated that the plan seemed to meet the needs of the community
very well.
Planning Commission Minutes -5- Aui -,^t 24, 1983
Co;mnissioner Barker agreed that the plan considered all facets of the
community.
There was a consensus of the Commission that approval of the site plan be
forwarded to the City Council.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Chairman Stout requested that the Conditional Use Permit for the Boars :lead
Bar and P,estaurant facility in the Rancho Plaza be placed on suspension and
brought before the Planning Commission in thirty days for consideration of
modification cr revocation. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission
that this item be heard at a public hearing on September 28, 1-983.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Juarez, carried, to adjourn to the
Foothills Cormnunity Plan meeting to be held on August 30, 1983.
8:30 p.r. . - Planning Commission Adjourned
Respectfully submitted,
jack Lam
Secretary
J
11
Planning Commission minutes -b- August 24, 1983 0
I]
11
E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 28, 1983
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11614 (F
DEVELOPMENT GROUP - The total planned develouiu=16 u, uv
single family attached units on 10.1 acres of land in the
R -3 /PD zone generally located on the west side of Ramona
Avenue at Monte Vista Avenue - APN 202- 181 -05, 06, and 16.
I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a time extension for Tract
614, as described above. The site is located on the west s`de of
Ramona Avenue, at Monte Vista Avenue. Nearly all of the 80 units
within the project are duplexes. The units range in size from 989
square feet up to 1537 square feet. Also, two common open space
areas are provided within the project.
II. ANALYSIS: A review of the tentative tract map and plot plan
indicated that the project is consistent with current developme; +t
standards. In addition, the building elevations appear to meet the
current design standards.
Tentaziae tracts in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are valid for a
maximum of four (4) years with appropriate extensions per the
Subdivision Map Act. This tract was originally approved for 24
months on Seotember 9, 1981 and is now eligible for the first of
two possible twelve month extensions. A copy of the original
Resolution of dpprcval with conditions, and the Planning Commission
Mlinutes of the September 9, 1981 meeting are attached for your
review.
III. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a twelve (12) month
extension be granted for Traci 11614. The new expiration dste
would be September 9, 1984.
11yzubmitted,
Rick Gomel
City (Planner
T:CJ: jr
ITEM A
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Time Extension - TT 11614
Septenber 28, 1983
Page 2
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "8" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "D" - Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Elevations (4 Sheets)
Letter from Applicant Requesting Extension
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
Planning Commission Minutes - September 9, 1981
Time Extension Resolution of Approval
11
El
11
ate=
��� I L
J
ql*
pO1pR
w
ItHIRIII!! I I
lu
d
_
�� w
ltll l
..a.
�'tI owt �
..
t
NORTH
CITY OF
rrr-m: j •
•
If
' rr t
c
ma+ N&OS
I raC-f 10+9 1
Cvn*r ccn StMTWI)
5.72 AC M/L
;
cut
ZhA Z!
VICTCKtA
Q
a) ro
L!
14cU-M \n
,.Fr.
V# C
4.426 AC r.-/L
-4
LA VINS
r-s!;Fsszc PG. is 872-36-109
---------- f MAP 972 -36 -7C
NORTH
CIT�
R.A,-NCI-.'kC) CTk-:Ck'N'IONGA TITLE- SI-rue
PLA NNINC DIVISO-
EXHIBIT.- F-2 SCALE----N-7-'g5-
U
E
4
1 401 47 41 40
j �r II zo +Ys/ zz sr u I zz sa e� I =-T �Ja
a `w ..r..:�mrt• -r .• <.v>i•.•rn eweeuaev
a • I1� 'Id 4�7 fa I O/ 'I Gt � Gf 4t A � � .
' v r• �5lL t _ - SJ_1CL(� � /,�� I � YI
Y
c
r Gf GG � 67 Gd I k 70
I r' ar ti; k [II JI k i 7r r
C I �
`I~! 71 i :!� 7f L� 7G .I :7 I 70 �i 70
Y r K• J IS ro j /T /e if zc a) 27 rl, n
ccallf
c¢
Kv
1
r+.+w
h �-y
e. _��� jl i�`:.'•�:'e.�w :..:.per
• 7't
wa q
NORTH
CIr)-,r OF ITEM: Tsth(-4 - Ttmi eeTems+o•1
RA- NCI -10 CUC VN IONGA TITLE: : MLnT) Zv ? T 1±Ap
PL:%,\ \I \G DIVISION E\IIIBrr: �� SCALE:
CITE' OF
RANCHO CI` GVN I0\GA
PL1: \\I \G DIVISION
C�
NORTH
j7L' \l_ � tt�.d4r ��tl� E'IEf��tonl
TITLE: SiT� j�fIJ
E \I�II3(T- T�
SCALE:
0
1
J
CITE' OF
RA.- CH0 CUCA�IO-NGA
PLANNING DIVISIO`
MA
C5 �
NORTH
TITLE- lei L-c `,(A- T' lOt� `�
LX IIBIM. _E- I SCALE=
E
c�
NORTH
CITY Or ITEM: = 1.6.1 q _ ?►�E I�
RANCHO CUC -VN JO C,A TITLE: �� yir Gtr S
PLANNING DIVISION' E \I tIMT-_ E -Z SCIALE:
E
0
11
CITY OF
RANCHO CIMkN IONC YA
PLANNING DIVISION
CV
NORTH
ITEM:
TITLE: C✓ L^� 1��TCTI 01L) S
E-N !
m
�'
E
�,�
G�
NORTH
CITY OF ITE \1: -7, i ;:� _-r;�1,4 - e-�C7r
RA- CI-10 CUO `'IO GA TITLE- L-rl- VA (C OQ S
PL%,NNI \G DIVISION M 11131T =- 65. `4 SG \LE.
L, o C Jr F III
�1 ID r.;•e; I
FFV1' O° '.FxT DEPT.
AUG 3 1�9
ALA P12
Auc;ust 29, 1983
Mr. Ciichael Vairin
Senior Planner
Planning Department
post Office Box 207
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Re- Tract Nur.oe 11614; Request for E.xptension
Dear Mr- Vairin:
It is recueste,� by the Development Grout to receive the permission
by the City to extend Tract Map Number 11614 for one (1) year..
This recuest is being Wade due to the past economic conditions and
the need for the market conditions to i= rove. It is now planned
to counence construction during the first (1st) quarter of 19c4.
If there is any additional information needed in order for a one
(1) year e--tension, please contact us = mmediately.
Sincerely,
Thomas L. Utman
(714) 644 -7500
123 Via Orvieto
Newport Beach, California 92663
TLU /mtm
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -98
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COM4ISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDIT1ONA.LLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 140. 11614.
NPIEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11614, hereinafter "Map"
submitted by Development Group, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing
the real property situated in the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision
of 10.1 acres of land located on the west side of Ramona Avenu-2 at Monte
Vista Street into 82 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission
for public hearing and action. on September 9, 1981; and
14HEREAs, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Mao
subject tc all conditions set forth in the ''Engineering and Planning
Divisions reports; and
41HEREPS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other
evidence presented at the public hearing.
NO14, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1- The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard tc Tentative Tract No. 11614 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all ,applicable
interim and proposed general and specific plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the Lype of devel-
opment proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury
to humans and wildlife or their ha~itat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of
record, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
Resolution No. 81 -98
r
Pace 2 ®A
El
11
fig) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and a Negitive Declaration is issued.
SECTIO% 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11614, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNI1G DIVISION
i. All units with a garage apron less than 20 feet long
shall be provided with automatic garage door opener >.
2. Fencing at the rear of lots 26 -37, which back up to
Ramona Avenue, shall consist of masonry block at a
maximum height of 3 to G feet with wrought iron on top.
3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Design
Review Committee shall determine if a directory is
needed for the project.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
3. The required easement per City's standard for the proposed
stormdrain. =hall be dedicated to the City.
4. The construction of the. proposed stormdrain shall he
coordinated with that of the tracts 10491 and 11608 and
that portion of the stormdrain from Victoria Avenue to
Ramona Avenue shall be completed Drior to issuance of
occupancy permit for this project.
�. The full width of the existing P.C.C. pavement on Ramona
Avenue shall be removed and replaced with asphalt concrete
pavement.
F.PPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1981.
PLANNING COr,,MISSiON OF THE CI Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
e, Kin 9 hairman
ATTEST:
Secret�qry of the Plannfnq-Coirrnzssion
Resolution No. 81 -98
Page 3
1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 2nd day of September, 1981 by the following vote
to -wit:
P.YES: COMISSIONERS: Tolstoy, Rempel, Dahl, Sceranka, King
NOES: CO'11ISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: CO.'VISSIONERS: None
11
11
✓
3
C
q=
M
`
q
a C'
q
q
q
'
T
c
O
w
=
U
9
�✓
�
V
__`
a,
J
a
t
L
^ ✓ C y
_ c 9 r
O
q
:
J
d
�
y
O
d"J�V l
✓
�C
�
q
�'�G
VVC = ✓�
9✓
a'
�.
O
qc.c u is
q�i
-
-o
i o
_
JY
-°
.L..
i
a W - __
i-W,
-
a
Lc 3
-
uc
G
-c
_
✓✓�
✓
c n c
ou
_
N
✓
'
V q
^ Y
�
� O
C
3
T
7 u
.rr. _ O y
a✓
✓�
O
O
O
~
J
v
Y-y
90
J -
_
d
T�C�:]
<.�
v
O7O ✓O_
_
_
�
M
C O O O
O O
n C
9
� O
_
+•
-
i C V
N
_
C
Cd
wd
I ✓.✓V
Y
V
9'
U
e.'
_
LL7Y6
q
Z
✓
O
.�.? -'i
J V
n
s�
l U C l
u✓ -✓j O E
J y
=_ C O
V
r
O,
C
G
y'
52
^V
i_r
C'9tfOJ✓
--
LO'LC4
..� ✓_
V>
O
Pi
VV
>
✓`
Vy
.nO C_ G
-t°
�G^
DC✓
�
y U_
�
Y9.Onu LC
w
'�V
M✓
<�r
O `
C✓uV r
�
C
✓C
CQE
aYE
LU
QI
✓
J
9 q
9
- V
J
✓
�
t > q
r O
-''I .'IV
-
=_
S
V�
9 v
CV�J -Oa
C
�_
O
o
V L
u
_Y
✓
_ � ✓
C V
C q V9
.. �c
r
tC..o�
_
✓
C
L'
i
G�
N L
C q
.i0i 0
N
C
—_ S �Z
u �
� r✓ 0 L
�
�
��
4
✓
q
V
JfL
— Er-
r i V —✓q
pi CO
C
COI
_
�G
I
x
I ±
X
I
1
I
LI
I
O
4
°
✓i%
S
OC
n�
n9/
'�G
ZL•
O
dC
O
VP
CO
VL
�
✓
� J.T.
� q
✓�
�
��
V d V
Y. O
q
_
q
..°.
J r C
C
I
,v
�
'
r.n
.9
n.T.
cO
�•_
.'
� �JiL
�
V
,+P
Jr_O
-_J'?C
u
a
ccu
c-^..�
nev
~��
-o ° �i
40
v
.-�
.� C�i
°
-
�_
,�•'
-.�,
d
-
~
Y
G
4 L
_ `
GOO
[ O
w C'
- .'
✓
_ ti.
1
v
�
_
_
✓ O
r c✓
Y
.n � _
`
n
4
S N
r
�
O
_
�
O O
m Y. _-
_
__
_ C
�
c
_
cl
V ✓
-
o n _c
_ ✓ ->
__
_
_
q
6'
C w.
n u
_
]_
V
O
v. L
^_ r
i
�...
_
✓ O L
C
_
D
0
Y_ M C >
✓
'
_
N
G _✓ r
�¢
- a G�
Q -q
G r _
��
SUJ GO.nw
G.On
_ ✓i
=
_ ✓
4
-c
4i
I
I
i
E
0
N
•
�
n
O
C
C'
��
cO
O
` ^O
C
L. .•rte
J
i
✓o
N
o
c`
G
..
cL..
a c
...` v�
_
c.
v o
�-__y__—
0 `
✓ O
G
- C \`
N
~
i
G_
E2
V
_
_
I
-° ^i. _
C t
✓ u
9
V
2-Z
°
I
'
I.f
>_ .n
= _ C
t C >
.n W
i L
q °
C
u •
_ > q
S 7 a .ru
C V O
�• �-
�
G G
L E
` O
u
d M � �
_
-- _� � O V
✓q
q
••✓ �
� c
� O
�q
P
`r
i -C q
�
J
W i
q
G
�.�
>L
`q
-
OL
O
✓i »'CGC
�U�
qL•
OqC
`'..r
V
I �C
�
_ C �• �
✓
G G
C
C
4
-
.°i
t
O.
1^�
O .U.l
S�G
�O
P✓
r
�•
COO
V
G
Id a
VY rC•_Y 77;
i
Ll
-
t
O
Z
OV
°
�
10
I.Y
c
C d L
w N
`.. c i L
c• w
E
>
N � V '
✓'J l r� L_
U
C
u^
^
V
�
�
l 1 -J
O r
L ]� O
c
_O �
^
Y �
d u✓
C �
V O 7 O
V
N
_
V7=
0OC Cr✓
�� �
> ��
Sn_
GU
-
-
x.^47 ° =�=
N�9 _LVi.
^ �
,OV.Nn• O
o -� L O
2 Z
a t
.
2 N C O
I
O:
^✓ =
'._%. �o-
u= 3
t¢ 4L
^4
�v..•
r..:°
Ga
vv
GL
~ge
s O
O• �
r
•�
=I
h0
Gd�V 3�MvJ
r
_
l
JCi
4 _
°c_
-L
—
oc >G
—L
-__
iav —
N>
a°+
•moo -
V
r
q✓
r
..
P
O� V C
C N O .
q _r
G. _
-
_ C� C
C
O
O
C'
= V 4 L L
✓
7
_. L
GV
S .Vi
_
C V
U P
_L
C
T n
r n
_°
C r
— c-°
vd Z
—,•uc u—
—4
c
6.°.
.tea
y�"i—
-ice
�$
Delp'•
`�.°.
N
P
l✓
y=
L
O
0
IS
•'•UL
`
P
L
C r_
0
•
G
l
N L
C
u
9
V u C C J L
- L
U
c•
r
V_
4
N q
V
>. 7^
S P
� .�
_
- :r r
C 4
G r
q
G
r Y• �
O✓
�
0` N
� O
r 9
v � 0 0^ CC V
V c y q`
L `O L
L_
VV ��VL
- T
rL
O
LC
�✓
tL
V
T
i.T> ✓anrC
=L-9 V
N
__
C O
r
L
r ✓ O
_ q C
i
✓ ^_
j
4
C•
C -_
7 V
_
_
_
4
q
CzL C9
�d
_
..
___ ___—
-��
_= -.
o�i.
^—
= Vic`-
�__o
_—
-- _ r C
�
C\ 6�
G �. c... ✓ O
�..� �. N
< .-i. c
G 9
C G c r n
c� c �`.
\ C O L �-
OI N
�: w
O P
_
N
n•
xl
X
XI
x Xn
I
V
E
0
N
IVJ L
✓ y
G' Gar
O G
4 P
�
�
_ O
V
L
`_
�
v
t G
�
I I i
�
_�
y � O �
O
L C' C
l a•
O
r T t
C
� l r
11
v
G V �
a• C N
r � G _
r J
C E
j
L r V n O
3
L
V
11 I
^
^Q'
�
vv
o-°ir
� 'uc
c� ✓��
o
c r
r
✓
� I
},
rJI
-_c
_ _
_ -�
L' -S t c
n
C.C�
-c•
_ �
_ .._
G `C
0
1 i
^Vll
OU
G C C
N O
r r
C'
C C
r V
9
I- _U.. �✓
u 9
� _J '_ ..a
N
r `
J
r
f
I
�
_ C
V
�
'\
`
P
l�� C_
L J
C✓ O O E
C
O
I
V
� -�
E
O
y
�
�
I
-if:
_
� 'aP
aLU
9
✓n..•
'r�
I
<.
r�i
U_
O_
_G
V UrN
yr
S
_
1
_
r
O °v
rc
c =cP
gyo
°��
I I
-
•'-� -<
ycn
o�ioP
._�v
�
`
`c
n
ETTI
i
T
.0 ✓"
G>-
`yVr�
L_fj
N •_
7 -O
wV0
N
r
`
j
.. vJI
_v
r G
r'Nne
VV4
v
O^
T •a V V
L
V
n O
l• G C
O r^ 4
U G
`_ r �
r
��
V
I
rrC LE v�
�
U6T
c`j
nu�G
.o _V
OI
rU
N
-
rOl
=LY
V N
•J O
.L..
_ n
C n
iJ d C V
- n S
c L� F r
V
� �
✓
��-
S
u �'
m O
d`
,r'
O
`�
LC
}�
�
69r LO. �=
rp4
Cp
✓b_
GV �S
�G.pNO=
y
O
✓r
�
C
•nV
n -y r
^N
-
�O�r�
r_L
�V
r L y
LLO
VpS
COq
=V4t✓
�I
O
^-J�
7
L�
CI w
n
L
4 O
O•
C
T
I
nI
- S r j
G 9
L Ll N✓
✓�._
.�Lr
�V nr � O
P`O
w r�
U
G
G...
O C L
P_O
O
�L a
r
V�
J]
=
���
�rL
- d S
`. N`
� u G
N
✓
4 J
n
L
_ O u O
L
l_J <,
r
-
I
G
•'
=^
'
n✓
_Ou
r G ^�
9^J
' J
V P r 1
•I'Or
`4C
PJ�
L4T
VP'%�U
N -I
^
I
��
rOCP O' �9
GCE
•
�
I
L
rr
„
n�J y P�
r
PV'j
F5 -
O
O
G
a0
V `O
NOu
uV
CL O•a
�9r
1
V >!
-
� !
c
LOC
_
�
-L -b _d O.rJi
��
< _
Or� ✓O.
Ir nr
6N OU Nip
7T
i
�Cw
- C •9 P9
U
�_.
-
C
_ L
tJG•• -V CN Cu
�Vw
6 q
L
I I
C
V
p
d
rl
NN
OO
r`
V
¢ q
¢Or
=a_
_
= E
NI
II
^!
T I
I
<V GI
I
J
u t r
O
n
C
✓ G
N �
a
U r
7 n
n_ O r
O
_
_
_
_
C
r
�
�-
r
r
`J
L
V
O
V n O r> 7 q G=
G G
•c
�
PIOJ
n _J
_
! _
V O
� C J
T r
� r
V •�
G
V 7_
C
c
y
�
V _
'� C
�_
\
.pr n' _ -J d _ E
r_ C G _
.Gn _
u
�• ✓
_ �_
O
_
'� V
Z2
i p
O�_r -
L 7J
-r
✓C
aLiVCV`
Cc
U
✓
r
�
> E 4� J _
_ r
r G
L
c W 4
r_
^j r_ 4 r
V�
r
J
O r U 9
r
'�
=rLN JC ✓_
C_
VJ
_
C ✓_
P
_
9 4
n
N
-
n d
L_ L
LO
4
J
U -' O_
__
L
__
O
✓ J +[ 4
` O v
4
C
O
L 4 L O
L
- _r
c
u u L
^. O"L
r c.
�
°
c '°
c- Po° a
y
`•. p
vr.
w_ a
._
L
�
VP
O
=ter OJ_7T
O_
_tom
-e
rL
S
O. -•L
L C a_
Y
_
o u
.. LO
D
Op 0 � -_
r0 ✓v
- -_ �
-� O
➢ G
O S
D
D r V
-_
L
?!
LC
T✓ C L r
G S
r
b r
=`
E v r L
r_ C
_
� i
r` O_
r
n` V __
0
_
cc. ^ _ter _._-
_ r o
t. -✓
G
=- i u
=`
___ _ L
o
-_
o✓ _
G
-- _
rpJ'4
✓� Ov-
_
pp` _ �
- -O
=Lt
p✓
�
)
� J
GG
LP r\
r_
✓^
i
r
C 7 O
G r
L v ✓ O-
w C J G
-
l
C- 1 d
G r L- V
O G 4 r
G
1
r G u V
_-
LOS r
._ J
-_rr
N
� rL40
LJ�UG
_�.�a.
L7Q -Ln
✓�
GV
y
9
r -
]Y
G V
w 7
C >�
c �
^.o
c
U q
L V
C
O u
Lv4i
V y
G l
C V
� q
O �
11
—
y
O
q
i
rO
r
q
r
G
_
_
I•
Y 1
d
q
I ��. 1
�
u n
G
q
." G S
U L
i
G=
'
V
C
T
O r
«
� —•�I 1
?^
ro
„5°
Yi, ••
c
Y.-
c am
Y.r
'
En
u
°�
°'
vo
°cam
� � a
-...
L-v
ct.
ar
`...Y.
�
t-1�
-`•-'•
°
�
.,
n
QP�
O
1
y
r
_u
O
C d
y
•pJ
r
«
+1
Y
..
4
Vw
^
^�
�
4d_
r
Cd
qr
�h
>•�
�«
�.� YrY"�
C..
�
'4
O
I
r
r O ti C
«
V G
° J
n-J
Q• L
W
1
V
— V
j
.. q
T t
G
Gn q
u j
OIL
I
Cl QQCLLL
—O
Vr�Y WI
G76
q4E
_
/d
1•J �C�
C^i i"._I
u!
<.'
Cq
V
I
CIY
=^
__
yP
S6
V^..
C -40 �
L C
_
�Cu
�
`—
b4
aSCA
✓
G. •"
6 2
� M 4 r
O
L
4.
LI
IP
!
1
XI
Xj
e
21
Y
L
�
q O
dcL,
P
1
•
q— "' C
6
�
G C
E
d
�^
v GK
.•7J
4t
C -
G
CV =
I
POd
C�
v2:rr
yqi
4'V 4
C
is
o�
oY
°.`-
aio
�o o
a
«�uo
_
do
=
qL
�-+
.°. -=•
r
�.
4
I
O
��
q
O_ O
O � 4
�_ G
-J �
'.', .
I
I I
I L
V C
.7 '`
�' t
C
r
ma y •A V
u V
C
u
«
°=
u=
Jg
vy
-
•O
^
G P
t—
I
—
• :•
I
CZ
I
�; I
i I�
�
I;�
,�
X•
9
r -
]Y
G V
w 7
C >�
c �
^.o
c
U q
L V
C
O u
Lv4i
V y
G l
C V
� q
O �
11
0
L
1
\�
V7
7
C
I
C J
V 9
�
�• �
�
O C
r
O_
_
V
_
4 C
8
7Z
T
v
•
- jV
V Ord
10
•.]CCU
r
C•
.r
fr
JV
_`COL
-�`
_
12
r
_
�j
-�u
O1
•)
ryl
^
1
1
1
1
I
I
�
\�
V7
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to
approve the J-me 10, 1981 Minutes.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, SCERANKA, DAHL, TOLSTOY, RL,"IG
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ?ZONE
ABSENT.: COMP'IISSIONERS: ROVE - carrie.1-
x * x x
Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, announced that the September 10, 1981
City.- County Planning Commissioners Association meeting would be held at
Di Censo's restaurant.
Mr. Vairin advised that the Etiwanda Specific Plan Committee would meet
at the Etiwanda Intermediate School on September 15, 1981, at 6:00 p.m.
Mr. Vairin invited the Commission to attend the September 17 meeting of
the Inland Empire American Planning Association meeting.
Mr. Vairin advised that Mr. Lam was meeting with a homeowners groin this
evening.
x i x x x
PUBLIC HEARINGS
EtiVIRONi MNTAL ASSFSSMEAT AND PAVED DEVELOPMENT 290. 80 -04 -- r1 ;1eJLJ
i DEVELOPMENT U`RO -JP - A total planned development of 10.1 acres into
81 lots comprising of 81 units arranged in duplexes, in the R -1
zone generally located on the west side of Ramona, at Monte Vista -
APN 202 - 181 -6, 6 and 16 (TT 11614).
Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the Staff Report.
Commissioner Sceranka asked what type and grade of shingles would be
used on this project.
Mr. Vairin replied that the precise grade has not yet been determined
but will be checked with the final building plan. He indicated that the
shingles would be an architectural style.
Commissioner Sceranka stated that a co:s^ent had been made regarding the
pedestrian circulation system which was not show on the design.
Mr. Vairir, replied that the project is planned to have a continuous loop
as shown on Exhibit "E" in the agenda packet and while it is not a
Planning Commission Minutes -2- September 9, 1981
11
Planning Commission Minutes -3-
September 9, 1981
raised walkway, it is of concrete. Mr. Vairin further stated that there
is a condition for additional cross walk areas to connect the circulation
pattern around the central core and private streets.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that in reading the staff report he noticed
that Lcndon Street has a drain that goes to Ramona. He asked if this
would go underground.
Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engincer, replied that it would.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked for information on the improvements to Ramona
that will go to flood control.
Mr. Rougeau replied that there will be no proposed flood control improve-
ments to Ramona but will go to an existing outlet on Ramona which is
known to be operating quite well. Further, that a storm drain will not
be a part of the project:
Commissioner Tolstoy asked what will go on the southeast corner of the
project to the street.
Mr. Rougeau replied this project will route it directly onto the street.
Commissioner Toistcv asked if the street's capacity is such tbat it will
accept this water.
®
Mr. Rougeau replied that it would.
Mr. Vairin stated that when the project to the northwest goes forward
the development will aid in alleviating the existing problem.
Chairman King opened the public hearing.
Mr. Torn Utman of the Development group made a presentation to the Com-
mission explaining the types of units and landscaping that will be pro-
vided. FIe indicated that no driveways will open onto Ramona in an effort
to ease traffic circulation. He also indicated that a homeowners associa-
tion will maintain the green belts that will be provided.
Commissioner Dahl asked if Mr. Utmsn would provide him with price ranges
of the units.
Mr. Utmar_ replied that they would be in the area of $50,000- 120,000, and
would range in size from 989 to 1,530 square feet.
Mr. Lichtenberg, 9923 Monte Vista, questioned the runoff water that occurs
I
at the railroad tracks on Ramona and whether this de ,7elopment would further
impede traffic under rainy conditions.
11
Planning Commission Minutes -3-
September 9, 1981
Mr. Rougeau replied that a vast improvement L. exp.cted because most of
the water comes from the north on 19th Street and the debris that causes
this backup will be eliminated by the project.
Mr. Vairin stated that to the northwest, a project is responsible for
the construction of a major storm drain in Archibald which also takes
water off of Ramona_
Mr. Lichtenberg stated that another of his concerns is that these projects
are so far from being constructed that an improvement will not occur for
a long time.
Mrs. Jackie DOJonte, 6975 Rain_opa, stated that she had appeared previously
and again expressed concern about flooding, traffic, and the number of
children that might impact schools. She also indicated that the neighbor-
hood was very quiet at the present time and she would not like to see
that changed.
Mr- Harley Lovitt, owner of the property to be developed, stated that
apparently local residents were unaware of the major storm drain improve-
ments that were to occur. Further, with the underground flood syst W
will be channeled into the adjacent system and will be an improvement
over the present situation.
There being no further comments, the public gearing was closed.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked how the water that cones off the street into
the e %isting system gets under the railroad tracks.
Mr. Rou�,eau replied that it is through concrete box culverts on both
sides.
Commissioner Toistoy asked if he was right in saying that the water does
not enter the street but enters the structure.
Mr. Rougeau replied that the pater still goes on the street a little way
because of the property to the south which will not be improved until it
develops.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked what will happen.
Mr. Rougeau replied that it will require a public project to widen the
railroad crossing.
Commissioner Dahl asked at what point this would take place.
Mr. Rougleau stated that this would be a couple of projects down the
lire. He indicated that the busier crossings are the ones that have
priority and indicated that those such as Grove and Vineyard at the
Santa Fe railroad would be very expensive. Mr. Rougeau stated that
Planning Co-+cission Minutes =4- September 9, 1981
there is some money at the railroads and FUC to widen these crossings
but it is done on a priority basis.
Mr. Hopson, City Attorney, stated that a lot of time cit-
y's can do this
with FAU funds and until those funds free up again that source of revenue
is cur. off.
Commissioner Rempel stated that he felt that it should be said again
that these developments will eliminate a lot of debris that is presently
coming into the street.. Be then explained how streets had formerly beer.
used as flood control channels.
Cotmissioner Tolstoy stated that the debris on Ramona is thr, cause of
the water going into the street. Further, that when the debris is
removed it will help the street flooding problem.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he likes this project and the year that
it took to redesign it was well worth it. He felt that the developer did
a good job on the transition. on Ramona.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked that a directory be placed in the premises
so that visitors would be able to locate the project's tenants.
Commissioner Dahl stated that he did not agree with the directory.
® Commissioner Sceranka stated that he did not have a problem with adding
this.
Mr. Vairin stated that this could physically be accomplished and could
be added as a condition.
Chairman King stated that he did nos personally think this should be a
standard condition, although he did not have strong reservations.
Commissioner Sceranka asked about ti-e illuminat_on on this building_
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he personally felt that'numbering, illumin-
ation and directories are needed on projects of this type.
Corc^issioner Sceranka stated his concerns with excessive ener¢y +ise in
the illumination.
Commissioner Tolstov .replied that such illumination would rE......e only
7 watts.
Commissioner Rempel states: that regular single family homes have mail
boxes a+:d these homes do not have. If they were individ_a� '+omes, thev
would have a box with a number.
Chairrnn Kin- again opened the public hearing.
Planning CorsaissionMinutes -5- September 9, 1981
Mr. Utman addressed the Commission and stated that the requirement for
illumination did not bother him but that a public mail box or 4irectcry
does. He indicated that they are on the border line of single family
homes and that individual mail bores will be provided in the complex.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Dahl complimented the developer on the design of this project,
stating that it looks like single family homes. He indicated that the
street widening has made a difference in the impaction or. the street.. He
indicated that the Commission is familiar with Carnelian and how it be-
cane a better street in the rain after it was widened. He assured the
lady who spoke regarding children and traffic that it is a fairly low
density project and will not further impact traffic. He indicated ti-.at
the developer must obtain letters of certification from the school district
before he can proceed with development.
Cc=— issioner Sceranka stated that the big ;est concern of the Planning
Conmission is for the residents adjacent and that recreation is provided
for children living wi,hin the project. This, he said, i^ t---t
ren will not have to run into Lhe street to play. He indicated that the
project contains sufficient recreation area to allow children the play
space that they need.
Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to
adopt Resolution No. 81 -98, approving Tentative Tract No. 11614 and
issuing a negative declaration subiect to the conditions as shown in the
staff report. Commissioner Tolstoy also requested that the requirement
for a directory be worked out between the Design Review Cc=ittee and
the developer anal, if it is felt to be necessary, install it in this
project. He also asked that this be a consideration in future projects
of this type.
Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to
adopt Resolution No. 81 -99, recommending approval of the Planned Community
designation.
B. ENVIRON?-TF_1TAL ASSESS?,!-E%17 AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 81 -03 - DAON CORPORATION -
A proposed change of zone from M -2 (General Manufacturin.-) to C -2
(General Business Commercial) on 18 acres of land located on the
northeast corner of Arrow and Haven - APN 208- 622 -01.
C. ENCIRO%*MENTAL ASSESSNXVT AND PARCEL *L? N0. 7007 - DAON CORPORATION -
A division of 9.649 acres into 3 parcels wiLhir. the M -2 zone,
locateri on the southeast corner of Haven .a nue and Civic Center
Drive - A0i7 208 -35 -03 S 11.
Senior Planner, Michael Vai *in reviewed the staff report.
Planning Comaission Minutes -6- September 9, 1S81
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION,
APPROVING THE EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11614
MONTEO LOCATED
VIISTAAVENUE 0 THE WEST SIDE OF
06, AND 16 AVENUE AT
WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the
above- described project, pursuant to Section 1.401.11.2 of Ordinance 28 -B, the
Subdivision Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the
above- described Tentative Tract Map.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonaa Planning Commission has made the
following fi—'n g
A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a
distressed market climate for residential projects.
B. That current economic, marketing, and inv_ntory
conditions make it unreasonable to record the Tracts
at this time.
C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval
regarding expirations would not be consistent with
the intent of the Zoning Code.
D. That the granting of said time extensions will not be
detrimental to the public_ health, safety, or welfare,
or materially injurious to properties or improvements
in the vicinity.
SECTION 2:
time extension
Tract
11614
(PD 80 -04)
The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a
Applicant
Development Group
Expiration
September 9, 1984
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
E
Resolution No.
Page 2
ATTEST:
Secretary of t.e Planning Commission
1_ JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cuc ,i7^onga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly I,,t�oduc�d. passed, and adopted by the Planning ('-190ission of the
City of Rancho :jcamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
11
r1
LJ
0
11
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 28, 1983
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Rick Gomez, City Planner
Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner
40
1977
82 -03 -
N R - Ine development of a cnurcn Tac111tiy
including t e placement of twa temporary trailers totaling
2,160 square feet on 3.3 acre: of land in the R -1 zone,
located on the east side of Haven, south of Highland - APN
202- 541 -24.
I. BACKGROUND: The Northkirk United Presbyterian Church is requ ?sting
a time extension for CUP 82 -03, as described above. The project
consists of approval of the master plan for the church property
with an 8,000 square foot sanctuary and an 8,000 square foot
meeting hall, Sunday school rooms, and administrative offices. In
additiun, the Conditional Use Permit also covers the temporary
placement of two prefabricated modular buildings totaling 2,160
square feet. The temporary buildings, which were originally
approved for two years from the date of occupancy, have yet to be
placed on the property. The current expiration date of the CUP is
September 24, 1982.
II. ANALYSIS: A review of the development plans indicated that the
ovJ— 'ect is still consistent with current development standards.
The project was originally approved for eighteen months on March
24, 1982. At this time the church is requesting an additional
eighteen months to enable the membership to raise the necessary
funds to start construction. This request is consistent with the
current Planning Commission policy to allow a four year approval,
with the appropriate extensions.
III. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
consider all input and materials relative to this protect. Should
the Commission choose to approve the applicant's request, aeZiption
of the attached Resolution granting an eighteen mon::n time
extension would be appropriate. The new expiration date would be
March 24, 1985.
Re e f y submitted,
P ck Go ,
¢it Planner
:CJ:jr
ITEM B
Attachments: Exhibit "A"
Exhibit
Exhib " - Laration Map
- Site Utilization Map
it "C" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "D° - Illustrative Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Phasing Plan
= xhibit "F" - Elevations
Letter from Applicant Requesting Extension
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
Planning Covmnission Minutes pq� 198Z
- March
Time Extension Resolutio;) of AAprch
E
E
:�
.. � . 1
Ll
1
L- dI ;ti
raw os
$ - I"M
i \ J
Iyp �
A�
NORTH
CITY Or, rrF-%1: CAR gn,
PLANING DI \ISICkN EXHIB'T: _SCALE: �--
11
11
Ll
ill iSlliii t'I i °Ii p
-�- J
ju( �I�1�tlt�l�il GI� �
t
{-
I � a
11- 0
1 f
I
I I b g --
,- i
CITY OF
RAINCHO CUCANIONG.A.
PLANNING DYLV ON
0
S a
Q
I
t -- --
t
t
i
1
I
i
I
(
i
f
t !a
'aAE U2A2u
rmxl- CAI
EXHINr - -grcf SCALE-
>o
a
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCNXIO\GA
PLANNING DIVISION
E
t
3
t
1
0
IMNI: C,�LP jf Z -off
TrI *. :jLd1J$r'tZA�[tVFi 'h AJL 1O
LXIiIBIT: �` SCA .E= -- __
rn
u
Y
FI
T
1
� s
d
>p �
Q
ere
I
Till
I
i
I
Si =
QTY STTS����
k Q�Sc
L-
1
► I
I -
,
S-�rr
I
I
I
L - - - --
I
I
i
I
\.8W "3ME!a
�1
i
CITE' OF nT-%i: co r
RA\CHO CUCANMONGA Tm-E- auaS+�G �l�41et
PLC: \\I \'G DIVISION EXHIBrr- SCALE-
!-
1
� s
d
>p �
Q
ere
I
Till
I
i
I
Si =
QTY STTS����
k Q�Sc
L-
1
► I
I -
,
S-�rr
I
I
I
L - - - --
I
I
i
I
\.8W "3ME!a
�1
i
CITE' OF nT-%i: co r
RA\CHO CUCANMONGA Tm-E- auaS+�G �l�41et
PLC: \\I \'G DIVISION EXHIBrr- SCALE-
1 J
\:J
Lowrence O. Bliss
Property Developmenr Broker
73:3 Heilman Ave_ Ron&O Cucmnon9o. C011fr -I a (714) 989 -4012
September 13, 1983
Community Development Dept.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga, California
RE: Extension of ' :UP 82 -03 -- Northkirk United Presbyterian
Church (Synod of Southern California and Hawaii).
Northkirk United Presbyterian Church has astred me to request an
extension of their conditional use permit for 18 months to enable
the membership to raise the necessary funds to start construction.
Enclosed is the sixty dollars ($50.00) necessary for the extensicn.
It
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -21
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA14ONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
82 -03 FOR A CHURCH LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
HAVEN, SOUTH OF HIGHLAND IN THE R -1 ZONE
WHEREAS, on the 29th day of January, 19-32, a complete application
was filed by Northkirk United Presbyterian Church for review of the
above - described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of March. 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described
Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
resolved as follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use
is pror3sed; and
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
3. That the proposed use wil. comply with each of the
applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse
impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on
March 24, 1982.
SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 82 -03 is
approved subject to the following conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. Ten (10) feet of dense landscaping is required along
the east property line for screening and huffering.
2. The temporary modular facilities are approved for a
two year period from the date of occupancy and shall
be removed from the site and the site appropriately
restored, unless an extension of time is approved by
the Planning Commission. The temporary facilities
shall be removed from the site prior to occupancy
of Phase II.
Page '2��un
3. Precise plans must be submitted for development review
is within 12 months, from the date of occupancy of the
temporary facilities, and to be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Commission. In addition, Phase II
shall be under construction prior to the expiration
of the approval for the temporary facility.
4. This aoproval shall become null and void if final
occupancy is not issued for the temporary facilities
within from the date of apprmvai.
5. landscaping and irrigation for this project, particu-
larly along Haven Avenue, shall consider water and
energy conservation in accordance with General Plan
policies through the use of drought tolerant plant
species, alluvial rockscape, and special irrigation
techniques such as drip irrigation, etc.
6. Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 82-03 is
granted subject to the approval of Parcel Mao 7237.
7. A detailed cross section of the Heather Street park-
way and new wall shall be included in the final con -
struction package and grading plan.
8. The existing wall along the southerly project
boundary shall be removed and replaced with a dec-
orative wail; 2'6" to 3' in height, adjacent to the
parking stalls.
9. All areas to be graded, but not included in-Phase I
construction, shall be hydroseeded.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
10. Applicant shall obtain approval from Cal Trans for
access to the development from Haven Avenue, prior
to issuance of building permit.
11. All applicable portion of the Conditions of Approval
for the Tentative Parcel Map 7237 shall also apply
to this project.
12. Tentative Parcel Map 7237 shall be recorded prior
to issuance of building permit.
13. Non- vehicular access, except fire department vehicles,
shall be dedicated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
for Heather Street.
APPR( '7D AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 1982.
♦ J
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CHCAMnNrA
i, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of kancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introdi:ced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the Gity of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on,the 24th day of ;March, 19 82, by the fo:lo:ing vote -
to -wit:
AYES: CO!'^.^iISSIONERS
NOES: COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
Rempel, Scerarka, Toistoy, King
None
Dahl
�J
1
z
6
Ll
S
Y
d
1
O
a
u
O
y.
C
S
G
S
0
8
O
0
N
N
i
••.J
7"+
e
V
�vJ �
N <
1 °
°
a
1 .o
I°
c
O
V
Y� O
,ll`1 i
TI Y
1 �
L V
O r
°
m
•
O.
JNWNV
=
V.
p^J9V
r
•O
O
J�9
.
2u
G
t
—4A
V
p
V O
_
V
1
90
G
d
4 L
��
r �
Y N
_ G
�
u
u°
y
C p d L,
'•Vf
�-
••
-
`
O L
9 C
V C' V
_
n'.
_ 6
� p
V
L' O
L•' Cl
M k
°n
G
q«_p
_
p
ij P
w
�°
V
°° w
O
a= Gr
Vy
8•.
uV
VN
9
l�
qlV
C ✓.O
b
y
D
L L
M
N
u
—
'
C
L O V
O>
V
_ L
p
r q
9' 9
C y
O
V
9 pV
V
u
u
4
V
rLdG
{y,
O
y.
l
60.N�
Y
N p
V
_
`
�PLCP°
•,
49
�°
CO
6b
Vr+
9V
VD
22
Y.y
yG°
=
90
—
C
J _—
L -NpNCI
qu
q_L
LJ—
D
VC•q
pC
-94V°
�` -SOU
d0
OTV
Opn �6N
LG
j�
�O
J_
q
w
CJ4
�
OG
by
�._
°d•
VVV
$i
V
P
>••
J�
Nye
fT'
E
•+p
—
qV«w
O
QGMr�
g
�_c
�L
—p
p
d=
V
<
Nr
a
C�
ti�EVV
Cl
°T
Y ✓u
FGi
�~.nV
y6
r
'O
p
V
N
D�
O
VV
e�L
V
-
WG
C
6
A _
qr
q
q✓1�9
52
—OC
—i
Lq
VSp�
U°u
V
G
•Vi
Nom,•
o
«`
�O`WV
Dy
pp_
V
x
V
POiP
O
•wL
WuuVV`
G
WE
N
r
V
dL G O
4
=
C
-
V
q
C 6
— 4
9 P q
O 4
V Q•
O— O
-" 2
�
P -cam
>
> O
C V
r V
C O�
r'
°cc
L
r`_
°•
M
t
a
t 4
°}
6`
W'
q 9
2 O
_=
6
C p
CV
`
Vr•°.
°V
4VV
9-
OG
Y
>O
O
rG
•�.�°
O)
O
O—
N
u
FJO
u
�
,Z2
G C
C
V.
>
I L
M 4 C
°°e=
r«
V_
O °
L.�
p
p—
.°+cq
X
p r
-r`'
J
P
e
V
V
Q�
V.
>G—
6GE
V p� O D
y�
4
•M1 L
_� p
9 J
`
^•
r
V L
r
«
2
V i •
G
Y V
L
V°
=
C C_ p_ q
9— C V f-
L
C V<
V r V• °
C
°
yl
C
_
= V
••
p G
y V
O4
G
f• W 2
V
O
y
_ L G
N V V �p
4= d
_9
P
Q°
—O
-
9
JL
PiuO
L
P—
V
� �2/J)v
4u
y_L•- Y
�
V'
2q
°�
_p
V
—q
YYVC
—�
V99p•�
`V
=rW
rLiwD—
Vt
N�ip••O
Nd
<q
NO
V�
WY'
—
L
QN
W —VS
HS
J «r 91V]i
h•Y
V'S�
��h"
r VVDrV
YI
60
6
S
0
8
O
0
N
N
i
••.J
7"+
e
V
�vJ �
N <
1 °
°
a
1 .o
I°
c
O
V
Y� O
,ll`1 i
TI Y
1 �
L V
O r
°
N,
m
••
`
O L
9 C
V C' V
_
n'.
_ 6
� p
V
L' O
L•' Cl
M k
°n
G
p
w
�°
V
°° w
O
Vy
8•.
uV
VN
9
l�
qlV
C ✓.O
b
y
_
•'
_
C
C
O>
9 V
J S
b
V>
G
G
O
V
9 pV
M
O
J—
ODJ
N p
V
_
G
VP
�°
CO
6b
Vr+
9V
VD
22
VNy
=
-
_
�
by
�._
�+
2.°+
$i
o�
"°
fT'
E
•+p
�_c
_LYC
i
P
A _
52
—OC
—i
Lq
VSp�
U°u
V
G
•Vi
o
_
L
=
C
-
C 6
— 4
9 P q
O 4
V Q•
O— O
-" 2
�
P -cam
>
> O
C V
r V
C O�
r'
L
r`_
°•
M
t
a
t 4
°}
6`
W'
q 9
2 O
_=
6
C p
CV
`
Vr•°.
°V
4VV
9-
OG
Y
>O
O
rG
•�.�°
O)
O
O—
p0. =i
u
FJO
u
�
v9c
9c�
i.
iar
O1i
o9i
°°e=
c
'L• L`
°-
.°+cq
e
-r`'
J
V
Q�
>G—
6GE
�•
ysy
y�
4
•M1 L
_� p
^•
tiL9
V —y_
NN
O�
— C
N_
q° J
° D
6L �
6Vr
L V
tiG
L_ J
LL
V
LL
_
= V
••
9 > T 9
^C
4
�.. >N
6V
ry
=4
N,
V
V
6
L
4 i
V
O
Y
w
C p
O
C
-
G
O
q
p
V
`S
'
V
qY
q=
b
cc
n
q
L�
c`L
N V
�
4✓
V `
N4
_
q N
✓
9u0
q
C_
L L O
jj i
r
V
p J O•
6
:J
C
V
y y
�
O
O
N
c
✓
a`^L
COo
do
q
y``.n
r..v
o
c ✓
�
o'
N
N
`
^
„q
�V
OL P.Vi
C
GAO
4V0
1
O
V C
L n
V P
✓ V
;✓
q 0
°Cd
nTj
F�
rF�
V e
Vtr
C w
yC
V
V
P
N
C n
V
✓6
tl
V
V
L
F
V✓
T.. ✓
w
r
N L'
C_
d
9
n
w N
d O
q
�
y
°
O
P
q
l U�✓
L
C
L
O
C
-
G
O
q
p
`S
FL
qY
q=
�q
N V
�
4✓
V `
N4
q
V
v
v
O
O
N
c
Lz .
do
q
s
r..v
o
c ✓
�
o'
N
^
O
C
r
1
E
✓ V
;✓
q 0
N
_
U
C
b
J q
V
z Im. S V 2 L
N
C n
V
w
tl
L
09
C
2
O
V
L U
d
9
n
w N
d O
q
�
y
°
O
P
q
l U�✓
L
t�� TN
C
M
0
�
L
M q
L
V
O
"� a
T
y
P
N
c G
.J
.�. r w
3
J d✓ T
_
p
C
Z
O
•e
l'
C
O�
- V
P
V U✓
V L
_
L
L
=N
c
Oy c
V V C
9 w
4
=C `
b —
q q V
L G
V O u
L V
° v
� J L
y�' n
^ q
Zy�a
C PCV
C C
E 4
. nL.
V
> O r
LbiiO
Pay Lp
C C
4 G
3J O
Cj
G
.O (O P
b
d i L
= P P
•J N Q= d l
�� 6N✓L GI_ CC GV r q NnV4lpo •NV
6 d d J C V� a Y c O °, � ✓ u L V 7 O_ T G
mP `q��7q�.G __ O _g � c uba_ ✓_O q� j
✓y FbN9 C rVO �t C VbN.S =>L CCVr
—
V C LV_V l_ _✓ T y Y ]� V V V w 4 6 N~ ` u �
NL =Vr �¢r� LL4 E .L.. VVCV G.Li 6✓
^c orE e c L i4 N • e q.°J ° ='o <� N_ °�
Lj i�r_`uc o ✓q iti c co °�:. 4L._ L..u_
N •CL✓L4 O N ✓_Lb��LO✓
4 w = YO w � p �✓ L �✓ V l ° L C .V.. O 9 �. C = V V
pL � q V✓ V N q V G r 9 �b 6` g V L � L S' r
C✓ G .Vn O C °� C` 9 Y� y V C .> t O V f y
2� q� T � N � �_ a O � G C V ✓ .Vr. Ie
PO =pn qV GS�✓ pNC EL r4V.V..c —t rL.4i
y L L V O Vf� u N l a q � .V. G E 6✓ O SC V � i
rp �`L6 �LGG °.� OvLr�bb V qp�
Vu' 1pq 4� _ Crr pq b w
b C L ^. G O N ° u G� L G C y N o r V w N •
1 d K
q y _ V g d C C •C. _� V V r 4 V � a i✓ r �� O= V= o
O 9 4 ^� °� L L P N 2 V_ V O G y 4✓ T
V Ci N N 4 L� p Q r g O ✓ O N T F. � r- i� O N °
� a .r pOi . qL N- avd >e ° L:av rP c °•
•' P n N_o vv � 00
C L y C y✓ q w' y S• O y 6 d C G� b ✓+ J` G q C
i•q •`'•b 3��C LN C °GQ VL °O �b0� C �N4
_ 6 P P V �. ✓^ C q m .` C. N 1+= g 9 V G L
r�; y
✓r rp^j `au WL'✓ C_O �O ^�r..au>GL n0 r
bT -� €� _ L� � c4C __✓ -✓ _NE
C4° WV °��' ✓O NgVN .CNP 6b <Ppww��0a <LOG
V
a
w
T C
C 6
c
V S
✓ y
a2
O V
p .VCe
q `
q V
C V
O C
c L
V
e °
O >
=4
b r
rJ
✓ b
cN
r �
m,
11
E
-
G
q
p
°
qY
✓O y�
N
^
O
q
1
✓ V
;✓
q 0
N
_
U
C
b
J q
V
z Im. S V 2 L
N
C n
V
w
tl
L
n q
O
V
C J
L
d
u 2 .°.•L
d O
q
�
y
°
O
P
q
l U�✓
L
t�� TN
C
0
�
L
M q
L
V
O
"� a
y
.J
.�. r w
3
J d✓ T
V
O NNqu
4u
iN -
>
p
✓ .°.
S.
1
q
c L
.�
OL. y E
F
I
G
L��
L
6
g
r C
O N a w
N
V Y
y
q
N N
L q
V IO
w
T
C T V d V n
N
L
.^
p
V�L
. '
y
OOO
[RR[''J✓O
d
C 4✓
=2S
V�5c
C r L
L V�
L�
C N✓
V
J
a
a O
C
a
O 3
d
C
p
V
„
C Qr
id
L
.n C
>
�
'LC
L �rr
p.
L C✓
V
✓
V T O
✓ C
O
V .- V
=
C
= y a L
b p
E.
O N r
l F q
M
Y-
V_ p g y
nOjV`pG
`CC
Coq
y�
Iii
Cab
4d✓
^�C
ra.
F J v
�
.-_
60
L✓
nq
hJ
pp
pa��OJ t�wbp
O
•1
N
�
N
W
L
=N
c
Oy c
V V C
9 w
4
=C `
b —
q q V
L G
V O u
L V
° v
� J L
y�' n
^ q
Zy�a
C PCV
C C
E 4
. nL.
V
> O r
LbiiO
Pay Lp
C C
4 G
3J O
Cj
G
.O (O P
b
d i L
= P P
•J N Q= d l
�� 6N✓L GI_ CC GV r q NnV4lpo •NV
6 d d J C V� a Y c O °, � ✓ u L V 7 O_ T G
mP `q��7q�.G __ O _g � c uba_ ✓_O q� j
✓y FbN9 C rVO �t C VbN.S =>L CCVr
—
V C LV_V l_ _✓ T y Y ]� V V V w 4 6 N~ ` u �
NL =Vr �¢r� LL4 E .L.. VVCV G.Li 6✓
^c orE e c L i4 N • e q.°J ° ='o <� N_ °�
Lj i�r_`uc o ✓q iti c co °�:. 4L._ L..u_
N •CL✓L4 O N ✓_Lb��LO✓
4 w = YO w � p �✓ L �✓ V l ° L C .V.. O 9 �. C = V V
pL � q V✓ V N q V G r 9 �b 6` g V L � L S' r
C✓ G .Vn O C °� C` 9 Y� y V C .> t O V f y
2� q� T � N � �_ a O � G C V ✓ .Vr. Ie
PO =pn qV GS�✓ pNC EL r4V.V..c —t rL.4i
y L L V O Vf� u N l a q � .V. G E 6✓ O SC V � i
rp �`L6 �LGG °.� OvLr�bb V qp�
Vu' 1pq 4� _ Crr pq b w
b C L ^. G O N ° u G� L G C y N o r V w N •
1 d K
q y _ V g d C C •C. _� V V r 4 V � a i✓ r �� O= V= o
O 9 4 ^� °� L L P N 2 V_ V O G y 4✓ T
V Ci N N 4 L� p Q r g O ✓ O N T F. � r- i� O N °
� a .r pOi . qL N- avd >e ° L:av rP c °•
•' P n N_o vv � 00
C L y C y✓ q w' y S• O y 6 d C G� b ✓+ J` G q C
i•q •`'•b 3��C LN C °GQ VL °O �b0� C �N4
_ 6 P P V �. ✓^ C q m .` C. N 1+= g 9 V G L
r�; y
✓r rp^j `au WL'✓ C_O �O ^�r..au>GL n0 r
bT -� €� _ L� � c4C __✓ -✓ _NE
C4° WV °��' ✓O NgVN .CNP 6b <Ppww��0a <LOG
V
a
w
T C
C 6
c
V S
✓ y
a2
O V
p .VCe
q `
q V
C V
O C
c L
V
e °
O >
=4
b r
rJ
✓ b
cN
r �
m,
11
E
C�
• O ✓
a•
P
.2 C u
'•
V
C V
y V P
7
11I� (e' V
04- •"•
V
_
1 V
A O
•• V
e'
° w
O 6
G 4 N P 4
—
S
V¢
.L.r L«
✓ L
•�
✓
.wr
y
u
2
'
O
�
r +
G M � S
v �
° � ✓
�
t
� u dy
— PV
D
LA>
lY. '1L
T'Ji✓
P¢
�
I I
�
✓tr G
V
—O`
AG
WC
�p
�
LE
�
� q•f
O
tuc
qCY
POEPO
w�
—.�•,
—
I
p
i
CV .' c
V✓V
w �
fdd
� ✓.J C.V..
rdi
._O
'�•' ^VP
�
u
W/� �
•V
p
p♦
^-6
^ V c.
t[ 1'
� V
P`
C ✓> V
✓ O
Q y c
—
r
°
q
Vp
N
N
u
� J' 1
_`
C
ccc = pP
mi
P VC
AL•J
�T
•T`
irq
P
pC
=_
V
VV
3
LCi I
w«
O V E V V C
� y t
� V
p V P
6C .
O•i. O
� q C� E
6
J G
O
,
V
�
2
O q•�q
OAC
Cq�dr
�
Cp__p
J
L
Cr
«
�•� I
E#
V
uVC Y_ S_O•
qyV
>l
NNN
9
uC —+
y O_
✓
jVl
L
`
P
PL
`0_
d
NLL_OA
�
¢
—O
O•
C
m A y
�¢
P Y• A
O
O N (3
4 O n
.•n E u W
6
•� C
L
V
q
•� Y
C�
L
=ja I
L
P L
.GOn
—
W C
Vw C
L V—
+O
O 6✓
d •a .-
L
W
d
V q
A p S
d
j j
V¢
O
V u°
d C C y
OI
¢
2
C C C
9
7 P
2s
°• o
vc
A
NQ'
°"
� `�.d.•r'c
�I
n.".
O1 d'°'
a
o I
S
yq^ � .°o
d �°
c° `
�`�
O+
..°.
`L
E 6N
S)Vy
C qVL
y
n-
O
v
d
"
�
LNC
V C`
/� O
✓
p0 q✓
V
WwNiA
d G J
Vc. F_
rO
rj
VI
.r ..
�
—r^'
a-
.a
^
6¢O
_ 4�
n'
V
UC.r
NiM
LL VyL
«v
`�
�q
•r
nO�
O. •s rd
R L�
�
C �
C VLO
u�p.
C V
G G Z
y�C
«PA
%
W d P C_
W
C d
°
OOV
�✓
N
=
C
- d
F
Q C' �!
r
.. -
P
-
N O
✓�
C`
✓
a.
✓"�— °.0.. w='
; ¢L.
°"��
qCn
CGOt
`
AA^9
°
Lam°
V 6 ...
yN�
'�
�Lwi
O
V6�u
— «P
°i
EN
L
q
«_V
i
—��
(1A
�{p✓
Pp
¢
wN�yp
NI
E
AqA
.OrGP q. Lu
Sa 4�u
qOL
—pa>
>O
YL
W)
aw
<•
v
Np2�•
y ..- 9 G L` O
P� O
.Oi• r n- «
V u✓
C C u
P—
_L
O u L V
V
L
^
r
L
I
A
L
�
d
9
q✓ E'
n
•J
V i
L w•
>
��
...veyGy�
.L. J C P .- .+ V
N O
d
9 P
d
4 PC C d
N
.Lr.
✓
L
^
y
p1
.d..
O q4L,L
V6 ul
V<— VV Vup
Yj0
� u —�
O7L
L¢o0
—'M =OV
N
.-N«
.] �.
^r
—_ t
•..A
�
G
O..
w?
°u
AL
.
G'•G •L -•.J NO OL
SV•n
+ LA
.i
= =PV
O
=q
^�v1I
V Or
6V�
OrG✓4
\
1= gV .d. yN
M
� ---
p
q
•r
6a'r O.:a b
J p
qi >.
y
Z
�¢q
'
G
_vd
V
_
q
•J `
p Y
t
—
V v
rV
G 9
y
V
O
Y
•^
GO
Cw
�
V
YOV
ty1
<A
�
d
C N
V,
e
SU
6— ✓I
.
Yl
q
N
•^I
�
�
.WO
Yf
VI�
V
r
A
G d_ i V —
p d
>•
p
C
Z O
.e
G
V
—• L V r O- y=
C_ u
p C C
V_
V C N
V` l
_¢
G
G
U 6
^
p
¢
L a 0=
+
C a•
V^
+✓
C"
^
V
C 0
0�
G 4
q
P
• 1
Y p ]..
N G O.
N O
A t
r— r
L
uOw
�
.r
Y
•/•
p✓
a
U
9
L C
4 r G _
O
D
P� G V
O L` O
= C
=� n
. p
C
G C
C
° p
° A E [" S + E
C L G
� V�
r ✓=
q u C� w
g C
r
=
C C
�
T V
_O
— _ ✓ y =
�V
uPL
W
Y V y
_ GA J Y
T V�
_
qC
GO—
N
Od✓
Y ✓O
P
✓
—.Jnd -C
CVUy
Lr V✓
�
C-
n_
C
ciC
Wi
-�
i2ye
CV
CWAC
L V L r✓ �i V V
� tl° V
•-
r
u✓ V
W o y= G
C d qr4
C
r
y O
L P
�
�>
—
C w
—gip
3
^—LG
✓�
CC
iC
~O`
C
'1
LNbp
S
O
p
`!
pF
O r ZN y
d
VOQU
W
_VV
C✓ •C
Gu`W
P
VL
G�e[°y
V�1
c
_
a
L
pV`
^ WVUC�G_J—
LL�g6
yE
LvuLLN
LGUC
C
L
°�
V1
C_ L -r _ v L—
r
J
pCV
W
O` W
O J
49
V O
Z V
L
d
A✓ C V
O O C
O C
a°. r
`
q
`
G
r d
�
Y 4
✓[' O 0_
✓pp > C
�.
C
•^ ' 6 C C
p C F r
✓ t O
V
V G V
p
✓ V N tl
C` r
A V
6
•
F✓ V
i CaV. C
C p � d
v
r
j
V
r d
C.V. O O i J i
>
P y
LL
V
«
�
dP`W
_
—>
V°
V•
p
=4•%o
v`d
-FS
9 z
nN �•..v
v.c s
s
b�•L°o
cN
°.v
o WNCa�_
-> - « °W
Ac°
P
_
.N.oe
�
�a
«QG OV J_vC
(JL✓
pq
I
Pip CL
Pup✓
p
L
p_
90
C.pEG.
✓F
LpL
✓cV°•
�Op
G.L.A
9Gr_ C
�
L
�V
✓j `.✓.wi.`J✓
6
COy
�I
�`
�`
_aw ✓
VpNV
SGC^
GI
2 —q
CLL
AyL4.G
GAAj
L
N
LO
UC
—
O'J —LL
uI
�=V
ACd
A.°iVG
V6
VC ..SC
C?•-L
uqC�
9L0
J9
4
y..
—C
r0
Li V4.•LO Oar
VCO>
¢40
JruN
•OCV
L
_
p Z
VU
Ol -dN
V.
Gq
LA
Nu
^�
l y c N N C V
2
L��q
—�
V.
✓ .n ✓> u � J
�
S� N p
o I
V V_ N
�
r
.••n V
°
1
c O
qf«
�✓
AI�p ULCi +�O?Pp
^
qa�
duo
�
L
Vs
c^
"C
NV
N
Ad
«
y
NO
—
^J
G
_
p�
LGGr—l.Oi•G <Cy
Ct •.
_IV.G
=a
q�VGG
•nOd V
w
— q
G r— O .� •. �
9 O_ t
_ _ u
✓
u q G O.
N _ r
•v O y
O�
w
•w O
C L
==
p✓
^ j
'�t`
cs:. - - ✓d
o
rc_
.-
Ad
N�
y ✓ ✓
L. r �.
cV
-�
°
op_eA :a W�.�'n .q. - °L�i
°
�� =
_ = -
o::
`o c°,
°�,v•.
oa
L 2
b
yGCrNV q
L Cq
J VC
�
6
�u✓O
a°a
ru
✓ VP
�y�c
9
P_
d
C<�l
V�
l
V
�
LO`L�TV• =� -a
qo�.«i.
-
=y.q
a•1 ...—
>¢
r
wo^
E^
�w
L u
L�
uu
cL
e6
O L`� L V V^n �°
G° �
� O V V
�
c
FI q` C i
L r_ — �
C
d —>
o C F_
✓
V
—_
°L• ` 1
y
I
p�
0
✓
yy
C
r✓ >
C>>
(,
—
r
N V
O A
- --
-4
—
N
^�
°j1
P
CI
N
G
•�
^>•
^I
N
r
^�
r
•y
^1
�
�
�1
1
C V
N�
�
�
I
I
•.I
1
•
u
c q
� q L` � �• � Y w V
_ q p
r 4 a c `
..g da P! Yr ' � oro
° c
T.n PwOt L,I V.r Jw
� w yQ ccri of a q a� Lo
Y
VO
E
C r T
V w Y
ry V T
•� O V V, _ V V
V` i• L q C
£ j
4 M M Y u V r p Y= P
a
CC> q
VJa L i6 i JCL at -
i_
L O ✓ u = V ~ m i � V
` r O•
r = p ?
J _ N
�' C °� �� j0 M1 r O•O £ O
Z c ',o ri qq O yam.
i
4' O _r VU
S W.L. as Gc `I OIL £_ of
�I
I
O
c
p
v
v
4
r
c
_
i
v
a�
Y u
O�
o-
� V
wj
4
n
c
q L
I
q 4
1 1
V W
Y. V
V
M �
ro y
O y
a _
q j
r
n
ca
d_
t c
O w
u O
v n
I O V
L
1�
LJ>
nM�
v
T
a�
7
G
y C
dg
u
r y
or
o�
c
J
O
vc�
J _
v
a _
ny
V L
O �
6
r �
r
Jz
Z-5
G
O
M L
V P
V
u �
ev
o >r
b
C V
r >
w y
u�
4 J
T w
u O
s�
a
J
C
P
V
O
O
l
v
i
a
C
M
u J
a �
O r
G J
kl
" s r
°x _
r c`
X R e o
C -� L S O b L C� V V O V V r u ✓ ••• j r
�� ae c��1 .-.. .c�.V yJ✓VF
4
.a�� E � � •• vc� b + °cT LrL .T. _� pgyoc
•G I i V C' V O L m r j e V O 3 L c
�� ^may ` y C L V g 2 O � i a• L QC
'< I1 O aV q,"• Y VOCE ° L ��`LV
a =2
a pp
I I I q �• �y r V v q= V V. y ` P r_ V P V O
d i v
Pv
C
c q
c+M
bm�
u C
� V
o T
_ e
O n
-V
O O
O y
z
d q
= u
i .°a
a `.
S
G V
` O
4 V
o=
E
.E
P
c 4
L°
q d n
Cu
�LP'u
�•^
�
L d oa
u
9 q
r
q w C
L
O e
S G
E
p
O
r
a
q q
V
O d
Z
O u
d L
U
V�
n L
a
G.9
u
y
C rJ
u
° �
•� N V
d .Lii
L
O
O P
4
9 p
uj
LT
_P
L•
O_d
Z
d
O O
p
l
Q
q3
O
c
p
v
v
4
r
c
_
i
v
a�
Y u
O�
o-
� V
wj
4
n
c
q L
I
q 4
1 1
V W
Y. V
V
M �
ro y
O y
a _
q j
r
n
ca
d_
t c
O w
u O
v n
I O V
L
1�
LJ>
nM�
v
T
a�
7
G
y C
dg
u
r y
or
o�
c
J
O
vc�
J _
v
a _
ny
V L
O �
6
r �
r
Jz
Z-5
G
O
M L
V P
V
u �
ev
o >r
b
C V
r >
w y
u�
4 J
T w
u O
s�
a
J
C
P
V
O
O
l
v
i
a
C
M
u J
a �
O r
G J
kl
" s r
°x _
r c`
X R e o
C -� L S O b L C� V V O V V r u ✓ ••• j r
�� ae c��1 .-.. .c�.V yJ✓VF
4
.a�� E � � •• vc� b + °cT LrL .T. _� pgyoc
•G I i V C' V O L m r j e V O 3 L c
�� ^may ` y C L V g 2 O � i a• L QC
'< I1 O aV q,"• Y VOCE ° L ��`LV
a =2
a pp
I I I q �• �y r V v q= V V. y ` P r_ V P V O
d i v
Pv
C
c q
c+M
bm�
u C
� V
o T
_ e
O n
-V
O O
O y
z
d q
= u
i .°a
a `.
S
G V
` O
4 V
o=
E
.E
V
Y
V7
p
d
V
O O
v
G C?
CY d
t-.c
Ir
V°
V��O
9•J
O
p
�
m
—_T
V
9 a
q�N
i V Lai
`
C N
�V
1
OTC
S
V
u
Ste`
y'l�
�La
V
.°+VT
rCLV
q
I`
I
OCTIJ
M
pC
��
L
tg`y
.VnOL�.
U
UO�L
1
00
NO
pN
-�
r•OLC
`cc
^'
I
N•r°..me
°
Nu a< _
T
a
�<E -°
-
c
o�
qv
e c o�
n�v or
oer
_'
L
NcJ, •�` I
i -ov
r
-O
�_�
No
LdoE
'fo
c•.-
o
°t
L'oeo
��
c�PY
..d.
�'
-.
c,
r
v��L•
V
N 4- r
•g V
C•
N
C � e V
n
i
p
L
q Pp
O
�(
�I
�1
y
��
k
�
•
�i
I
1
i
V7
J
Mr- Gomez announced that the Planning Commission meeting this evening
T adjo;. -n to April 5, 1982 to discuss the Terra Vista Planned
Cammunitq, ibis meeting would be held in =he Lions Center beginning at
7 p.m.
Mr. Gomez further announced that an addition could be made for tonight's
meeting under Director's Reports,
Use Permit, Item J, to d m
discuss the Sharma Conditio
;ia3
PUBLIC iir ARZ_ GS
r-- L vZ...MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The development of a church faclli '� 82 -03 - iV_ pg-IFY -
-+A R -7 zone, located on the east side Of Haven, acres of land in the
tl�!/ A-PN 202- 641 -24. , south of Highland -
B.
' RVUTATION - A divi - - -- `�� - tiAVt7I AND HII,HiAV7
?_ sian Of
parcel 11.3 acres within the R -1 zone into 3
s, located an the southwest corner of
Avenues - APN 20�- 641 -24.- Highland and Haven
Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the Staff Report.
Com- icsioner Sceranka asked if the staff could review those concerns in
the Sty -ff Report, regarding the parcel alignment.
Shintu Bose, Senior Civil Engineer, replied that he vacant piece north
o£ the church site is the main reason for statements concerning the
realignment of the parcel. If Parcel 2 was kent residential, it would
Pose a design problem for this Parcel Map. The Engineering staff felt
that this would be an isolated area for a residential area.
Parcel. nor Sceranka asked what CalTran's req "lrements were for this
Parcel.
M Bose replied that CalTrans cad recommended strongly that arrangements
were made so that access would not be from Haven Avenue.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there would be a median break in Haven
Avenue, located at the proposed New Street.
Mr- Bose replied that there was no recommendation for a median break in
Haven Avenue.
Chairman Ring oaened the public hearing.
Larry Bliss, 7333 Hellman, Rancho Cucamonga, representing the Applicant,
addressed the Comm2__iOn and introduced Pastor Jerry Lyman of the
Northkirk Presbvterian Church.
Planing Commission Minutes _ 0
-2 March 24, 1982
•
Pastor Lyman addressed the Commission stating that a large number of the
congregation were present for this meeting. He urged Planning Commission
Permit it be
approval ,- the Conditional Use saying that would an asset
to the Community as well as to the Church itself. Pastor Lyman informed
the Commission that his church had been meeting since 1979 at the Alta
Loma High School and they were quite anxious to be in their permanent
church facilities.
Commissioner Sceranka asked :'actor Lyman whether his congregation or the
Church Site Committee had discussed with the Engineering Division's
suggestion that the site not be aligned the way it was proposed.
Pastor Lyman replied that the congregation and committee had been made
aware of CalTran's suggestion, but had not made any plans to follow
through with CalTrans suggestions.
Larry Bliss addressed the Commission regarding the compatibility of the
site with surrounding property. Mr. Bliss stated that he had spoken
with mauy of the surrounding property owners and had been informed that
they welcomed the addition of the church to their neighborhood. _He
stated that one of the concerns of the surrounding >perty owners was
the visibili.cy of the parking lot. This project was conditioned to hav_
lighting ir. the parking lot and the parking lot would be adequately
landscaped with trees to screen visibility. The property owners were
conce -ned that there would be too many trees to block their views and
that any Eucalyptus trees could stain their swimming Pools. He felt
that these concerns could be worked out •-+th the property owners. Mr.
®
Bliss stated that an appropriate desig-i had been selected in Which
pedestrian access was being provided from Haven Avenue. As to the use
of the north parcel, t•tl. Bliss stated that there were no plans for this
parcel at this time. The property owner is not proposing any use in the
near future until the freeway situation i:- esolved and until the future
needs of the community are :mown.
Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Bliss if he had ever discussed with
staff the possible realignmentrof the parcel.
Mr. Bliss replied that he had discussed this possibility with staff,
however, to align the parcel north to south with the cul- de-sac street
along the east side would require the church to purchase an additional
$70,000 to $8y3,000 worth of land which they could not afford to do.
C_
Commsssioner King asked Mr. Bliss if it concerned him that, assuming the
fr -ewav went in, the proximity of New Street to the freeway would be
approximately 280' and that the only way you could get into the project
site would be b? going south on Haven maxing a U -turn_ at 19th Street and
if going north on maven you would hare to make a U-turn on Highland to
go south.
Planning Commission Minutes -3-
March 24, 1982
Mr- Bliss replied that it would be more ,
to the freeway because of would than 280 before
timed the lights at s t. dedicated right -of -wa reaching a rasp
give cars time to pull ill oreot and rou hl° y• °e staled that he had
g , I2 -15 seconds elapsed to
controls and out of the street. He felt
hours, access would not being .n Sunday and not Burin with those
a Problem. g Pea,: rush
Dick Nelson, Chairman of the Property Committee for terian Church, addressed the Commission stating
? iaven was selected by the C the United Presby-
osmittee because thist at the property on
t e ner,,center of the City- He stated that he'£elt the
would be compatible with the pule be sear
tl - General Plan and Zoning Sur- area. The Proposed use
this would not be a c t:L and sav nothing Committee checked
ampa�ible site. that SAOUld indicate that
been vi'.h anyone who was He had not personally bEen in contact with opposed to the proposed church site been u
the site, $e further stated thoa e=rein the area who were site, but had of
on the reason for -e in favor la
port% side of the street was because .},._the street
co'mon easement or one break CaL_ans had being placed
ferable than in the street to both ties was a
two separate access points. Properties
was pre -
Jefj Hill, 9607 Cameron Street, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed t
stating that he was in favor of the project as a member of t
and ;130 a resident of he Commission
the Conmmuni+y, he church
r' -'�'3'd Allen, 6402 Haven Avenue
stating that he was not a m berRanc'oo Cucamonga, addressed the
Property owner wishing of the church, however, Commission
ng to voice his S"PPort of the project,
an adjacent
There were -o further public comments and t ;ae public hearing vas closed_
spoken loner Tolstay stated that he agreed with the people who had
spoi:en in favor of the church being at that site, but had some
with zccess. Any car coming out of Nev Street would have
to $ighland Avenue or the Freeway, roblems
there, and make y whichever intersection
to travel up
Toes e, a U -turn to travel s - eirection happens to be
y stated that it vas his opinion outh�or_ Haven Avenue. Co
where felt that the Cor.- aission ss opinion that that was good sotuati
mere not a good situation.
Pecple would have to make U- not approve the design for a
they needed to. He further tuns i.n order street
cut �n New Street that close stottheLhat to gc L a direction
he also had a problem with the
suggested that the church be proposed freeway proper
Street be ei.iminated, and that in a north /south direct He
possible and possibly break the the curb cut be placed as far New
north and make a median so that south as
1 -turn, cars would not have
to go
Commissioner Rempel stated that he felt that worse
croated by placing a cut across Haver__ He felt that problems be the
applicant was the Dould
best solution.
Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr_ Bose to tell him the problems he thought
Planning Commission Minutes Aft
-4- Yarch 24 1.q
82
11
11
11
would be created in the 290' from New Street to the freeway on ramp.
Mr. Bose replied that the problems he could foresee would be those of
rear end accidents caused by people coming at a higher speed approaching
the on ramp and people slowing down to turn into New Street.
Commissioner Sceranka asked if the 290' was adequate distance to provide
for a turn onto the freeway and still allow for access onto Haven.
Mr. Bose replied that it cas adequate distance. He further stated that
he felt it was inappropriate at this time to take dedication on a street
at this location. it was kept open on the parcel map by providing only
one access from Haven to provide a joint -use driveway at the property
line. Future development would be required to dedicate at the time of
development.
Commissioner Sceranka stated that he felt that through the Design Review
Committee, Planning and Engineering staffs, they came up with the most
appropriate design for this site. He further stated that he did not
feel that a major traffic problem was being created.
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried to adopt the
Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 82 -03.
AYES: CO%MSSIONERS:
NOES: COM'1ZSSIONERS:
ABSENT: C"s[iSSIONiRS:
ABSTAIN: COPQSISSIONERS:
REMPEL, SCERANKA, TO'LSTOY, RING
NONE
N
NONE
Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Rempel, carried to adopt the
Resoluti�n.approving ?arcel Map 7237, including the offer of dedication
for New Street.
F.YF_S: CO?4�SISSIONERS:
NOES: COV' IISSIONTERS:
ABSENT: COhKISSIONEPS:
ABSTAIN. COV_4ISSIONERS:
SCE CaIN -ZA, REM PEI., KING
TOLSTOY
DAHL
NONE
Commissioner Tolstoy voted No for the reasons previously stated.
7:50 p.m. The Planning Commission Recessed
8:00 p.m. The Planning Commission Reconvened
Pla-.,ning Commission Minutes -5-
March 24, 1982
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION,
APPROVING THE EXTENSION FOR CONDIT'3NAL USE PERMIT 82 -03
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF F,.VEN AVENUE SOUTH OF
HIGHLAND AVENUE - APN 202 - 641 -24
WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the
above - described project, pursuant to Section 61.02191"o)SB of the Zoning
Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the
above - described project.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following findings:
A. That prevailing economic conditions and interest
rates have delayed the construction of this project.
B. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval
regarding expirations would not be consistent with
the intent of the Zoning Code.
C. That the granting of said time extensions will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,
or materially injurious to properties or improvements
in the vicinity.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planing Commission hereby grants a
time extension or:
Tract Applicant. Expiration
CUP 82 -03 Northkirk March 24, 1985
APPROVED AND ADO °TED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, — T Chaarman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the PI arming Commission
Resolution No.
Page 2
13
�1ACK LAM, Ser.etar, of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do harehy certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cormission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
11
E
C
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF ECHO C'UCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 28, 1983
Chairman and Members of the Planning Corurission
Rick Gomez, City Planner
NG
ABSTRACT: This is a review of potential operational modifications to
The conditions of approval which are intended to resolve complaints and
disturbances created by this establishment. The business is within the
Rancho Paza located on the northwest corner of Carnelian and 19th
Street.
BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission on August 24, 1983, directed the
P annins Division staff to suspend : onditional Use Permit 78 -03 and set
a public hearing within 30 days in order to rciiew complaints. The
Planning Commission last heard this item on January 26, 1983, when a
performance report was presented by the Planning Division staff
regarding the applicant's conformance to the modified conditions of
approval. At that time, the Commission considered:
I.. The construction of a noise attenuation wall along the westerly
property line-.
2. Impeded access to the northwest parking facility.
3. Installation of speed bumps.
4. Preparation and implementation of a dinner menu.
To date, construction of the sound attenuation wall has been completed,
the access to the northwest parking facility has been clocked, and speed
Sumps have been placed in the parking lot. However the preparation of a
dinner menu has not been implemented. In addition, accoustical
paneling, as proposed by the applicant to be placed on the rear door in
conjunction with condition E (sound analysis and installation of
attenuating material'), has not been installed.
ANALYSIS: The City Planning Division has again received complaints from
three adjacent residential property owners asking the Commission to
consider modifications to the existing Conditional Use Permit for the
Boars Head by limiting the hours of operation to 10 p.m. Tneir
complaint is primarily focused on the parking lot between 11 p.m. and 2
a.-s. It is during these late and early morning hours that the
ITEM C
PLANNING COKMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 78 -03 /BOARS HEAD
September 28, 1983
Page 2
neighborhood noise levels at = significantly reduced. It would take only
a loud conversation or the starting of an engine to again raise the
neighborhood noise level significantly. The Commission can consider twc
options of action to take this evening:
A. Revoke the Conditional Use Permit. This would remove the bar and
entertainment facility if the Commission found that the bar and
entertainment uses caused disturbances which could not be mitigated
to an acceptable level compatible with the surrounding residential
ne i ghborizood .
B. Again modify the conditions of approval in order to mitigate these
disturbances. The following is a list of mitigation measures which
the Commission may want to consider in modifying the Conditional Use
Permit:
1. Limit the hours of operation to a more restrictive time. One
of the major complaints is noise and disturbances created by
patrons leaving the facility in earl:- morni,eg hours. This
restriction would be in keeping with Commission policy to limit
the hours of operation for neighborhood commercial
establishments to 11 P.m. in order to reduce the instances of
noise disturbances to surrounding residential neighborhoods.
2. Require the installation of noise attenuating materials to
existing walls, doors, and ceilings, in order to reduce the
interior noise levels. This could he accomplished through a
comprehe-sive sound analysis of the building which could be
conducted by a sound engineer in order to determine the
appropriate sound insulation and /or interior noise level
attenuating devices.
3. Require annual review of the Conditional Use Permit by the
Planning Commission to determ -re conformance with the
conditions of approval and its ongoing compatibility with the
surrounding residentiai neighborhoO.
4. Require the implementation of a dinner menu within sixty (50)
days from the Commission's action to modify the Conditional Use
Permit.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in
The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices mailed to
surroanding property owners. Staff has discussed potential mitigation
with the homeowners in the area as well as the business owners.
11
J
E
E
PLANNING COKMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 78 -03 /BOARS HEAD
-)eptesrber 28, 1583
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct
a public .easing and crmsider ail naterial and testimony presented.
Staff has provided twJ Resolutions wr0 rh reflect the two options
available to the Ccgmission-
lly submitted,
ck /G=eZ
ty Planner
:jr
Attachments: Original P.esolutien - 78 -40
Resolution of Modification 82 -98
Minutes - January 26, 1983
Minutes - October 27, 1983
Correspondence from Adjacent Property owners
Resolution of Modification
Resolutior. of Revocation
11
E;
ff
t
L
ErnI en°'A
60P 7419
i-
' RESOLUTION NO. 78-40
A RESO:.`UTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION FOR THE APPRCr1,P?. OF CUP 78 -03 - HONE
TO ALLOW A RESTAURAbi TNZ'�! RELATED BAR FACILITIES
AND MUSICAL ENTERTAIiZSENT WITHIN A PROPOSED NEIGH-
BORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER AT THE NORTHWEST CORNEP. OF
CARNELIAl; AND 19TH STREET IN TES C -1 ZONE
WHEREAS, on the 5th day of December, 1973, a complete application was
filed for review on the above described property; and
WHEREAS, on the 27th day of December, 1978, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above described project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved
as follows:
EECTIUN 1: That the following findings have been made: .
1. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the p_iposed use, and lardscapic.g and setbacks are pro-
vided v',ich are compatible with existing develop=_.,-, in
the surr"nding area.
2. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and
higr,aays properly designed, both as to widt'm and type
of pavement to carry the type and quantit,,.' of traffic
generated ty the subject. use.
3. There will not be an adver -e effect upon abutting pro-
perty.
4. In requiring the conditions in the report, the Commission
deers such requirE -n.nts to be the minimum necessary to
protect the health, .::.Eety and general welfare.
5. This project will not a objectionable nor detrimental
to existing uses pE —itLed in the zone district in which
this project is locates;.
6. This project will not be contrary to the objectives of the
proposed Master Plan and will not be ir. conflict with the
purpose and ix.tent of the Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 2- That the Planning Ccmmission sots the following conditions on
the above described project_:
1. Developer shall comply witn the latest adopted U-,,iform
Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Cede, Uniform Plmnbing
lbCede, National Electric Code and all other applicable codes. �'
2. Approval of •.iris, request shall not excuse compliance
w'.th all other applicanl= City Ordinances in effect at
this rime.
3. 11 sign'-n-. shall be it confarmance with the adopted
uniform signing program.
4. Hours of operation shall not excee± 11 a.m. to 2 ,i.m.
5. The CUP is granted for a period of indefinite time with
Planning Commission review after 24 months of operation at
which time the Commission may add or delete conditions.
Bar and entertainment facil` ties must be used in coniu:.c-
ti.on with the restaurant usage.
7. The applicant shall agree in writing to all conditions
within 60 days from approval.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF December 1978
PLAi3NING CO *EMISSION OF 'ME CITY OF RAC.: HO CU:.ANONGA
�J
Perman Rempel, Chaitm�p'
f 4
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK 1-4,M, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the .:ity of Rancho Cuca-
monga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and rea lariy
introduced, passed, ane adorted by the Planning CoTmi ;lion of the Citv of Rancho
Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission reld on the 27th day
of December, 1978.
AYES: COM ISSIONERS: DAHL, TOLSTOY, GARClh, RaTPEL
NOES: CCIMISSIONEAS: NONE
ABSENT: COM ItSIONERS: JONES
11
11
E
RESOLUTION 83-
A RESOLUTION OF TEE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONG.A, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 78 -03 FOR THE BAR AND ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES
WITHIN THE BOARS HEAD ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED IN THE RA,'gCHO
PLAZA, AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TV: STREET AND
CARNELIAN
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of August, 1983, the Planning Commission
determined a need to suspend Cenditi� ^.al Use Pemit 78 -03 and to conduct a
public hearing; and
14HEREAS, on the 28th day of September, 1983, the Planning Commission
held a public hearing to consider the -beve item.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLV'=') that the Planning Commission cf the
City of Rancho Cucamonga resolves as follows:
SECTION 1: Additional conditions and changes are found to be needed
for Conditional Permit 78 -03 in order to mitigate the past disturbances
associated with the use which are not in accord with the intent and pirposes
of the neighborhood commercial shopping district. Therefore the following
conditions are added to those conditions asready in effect per Resolutions
78 -40 and 82 -98.
1. The hours of operation shall be from 11:00 a.m. to 11 P.M.
2. Noise attenuating materials shall be installed to existing wails,
doors, and ceilings, in order to reduce the interior noise levels.
The applicant shall prepare a comprehensive sound analysis of the
building, conducted by a licensed sound engineer in order to
determine the appropriate sound insulation and /or sound attenuating
devices.
3. The Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed annually by tie Planning
Commission.
4. A dinner menu shall be implemented within sixty (60) days from the
Commission's action to modify the Conditional Use Permit.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF September, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
Resolution 83-
Page 2
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that she foregoing Resoliit on was duly a -d
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of September, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit-
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
1A
RESOLUTION 83-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CL'CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVOKING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 78 -03 FOR A BAR AND ENTERTAINMENT FACILITY WITHIN
THE BOARS HEAD ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED IN THE RANCHO PLAZA
AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND CARNELIAN.
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of August, 1982, the Planning Commission
determined the need to suspend Conditional ;lse Permit 78 -03 and to conduct a
public hearing; and
WHEREAS, on the 28th day of September, 1983, the Planning Commission
held a public hearing to consider the above item.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that t. +e Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga resolves as follows:
Section 1: That because of the ongoing disturbances to the
residential neighborhood surrounding the Boars Head establishment located in
the Rancho Plaza Center, it is determined that the use is contrary to the
objectives of the General Plan and is in conflict with the purpose and intent
of the C -1 development district. The Planning Commission therefore finds that
in order to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the surrounding
properties, Conditional Use Permit 78 -03 shall be revoked due to said
disturbances which cannot be mitigated to the acceptable level compatible with
the surrounding residential neighborhood.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST'
Secretary of the Panning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
-11 11
11
E
CITY O"t RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 28, 1983
TO: Chairman and %embers of the Planning CaOjmission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -18 - !TOWARD -cA revision Fa st
previously apprnve Con �t.ona Use
Assembly of God Church for the development of a 9400
square foot building on 5.5 acres of land in the
R- 1- 20,000 zone located at the northeast corner of
Archibald and Wilson Avenues - APS 201- 381 -01.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Appeal of Design Review Committee
reconmen anon
B. Purg_o_se�• Construction of a 9,400 square foot multi - purpose
church building
C. Location: The northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and "Nilson
Avenue
D. Parcel Size: 5.5 acres
E. Existing Zoning: R- 1- 20,000
F. Existing Land Use: The property is currently unused, but was
previously used for agricultural purposes.
G. Surroundin Land Use and Zonin
North - ing a ami y omes, vacant property, zoned
R- 1- 20,000
South - Single family tract, zoned R- 1- 20,000
East - Future location of Edison substation, single family
amily
homes, zoned R- 1- 20,000
West - Vacant property, Alta Loma Channel, zoned R -1- 20,000
4. General Plan Desi nations:
ro�ect ite - ery Low esid ° -ntlal (Less than 2 du /ac)
North - Very Low Residential
South - Very Low Residential
East - Very Low Residential
West - Very Low Residential
ITEM D
LI
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Conditional Use Permit 82 -18 /Howard
September 28, 1983
Page 2
I. Site Characteristics: Two agricultural structures currently
exist on the site, including a delapidated barn and a small
flat roofed shed. Extensive grading has occurred adjacent to,
and at, the north end of the site. As shown on Exhibit "C ",
two ro°:k retaining walls were constructed as part of a small
reservoir wnich has been unused for a number of years. Also,
large Eucalyptus trees are scattered along the north end of the
site and along the east and west property lines.
II. BACKGROUND: This project is a revision to a CUP previously
approve Tin November of 1982 for the First Assembly of God
Church. At that time the Planning Commission approved two
temporary buildings on the property as shown on _xhibit "G ". While
these buildings are not trailers, they were designated as temporary
because of inconsistencies with current design standards generally
applied to church structures in the Alta Loma area. After approval
of the CUP, the church chose to pursue the development of a
permanent facility and apparently purchased framing for a metal
building. As shown on the plot plan, Exhibit "D ", the proposed
permanent structure will eventually become the multi - purpose
building for the church. A future sanctuary will be constructed at
the northwest corner of the site.
The Development Review Committees,
reviewed the project and requested a
the project into conformance with
design standards. The church does no t
Committee recommendations acid requ
reviewed by the Planning CommiSsio
prepared. Therefore, the review
consideration of approval, b,:t rather
Commission consensus with regard to
Committee's recommendations. If the
of these committees, the applicant
drop the project or make the revisi
action. The following sections o
committee.
including Design Review,
number of revisions to bring
the current development and
agree with the Design Review
ested to have the project
n before any revisions are
this evening is not for
the applicant is requesting a
the Design Review and Grading
Commission supports the views
will decide whether they -ill
ons prior to final Commission
utline the comments by each
III. ANALYSIS•
A. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed
the project an etermined that revisions to the building
design are necessary to provide a structure mare compatible
with the single family residential character of tie area. The
Committee felt that the materials, the building scale and mass,
and the roof design are inconsistent with the chi,racter of the
neighborhood and that major revisions would be needed to bring
is it into conformance. The church disagreed with the Committee's
comments.
PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT
Conditional Use Permit 82 -18 /Howard
September 28, 1983
Page 3
B. Gradin^ rlmlittee: The conceptual grading plan was not
appr— ov —by the Grading Committee. The Committee's main
concern was that the plan proposes to creaue d large fiat
building pad over most of the site. The result is straight
engineered 2:1 slopes up to six feet high north of the subject
building and parking lot and along the entire Wilson Avenue
street frontage. The Committee felt that this is inconsistent
with the grading practices desirable in the Alta Loma area.
The Committee recommends that the plan be revised to preserve
the existing and /or natural topography of the site to the
extent possible.
C. Develo ment Review Committee: The Development Review Committee
requeste that a number of minor adjustments to the site plan
be prepared. The changes included items such as locating
on -site fire hydrants, providing screening and landscaping of
the parking lot, and providing landscaping adjacent to each
building. 'these items will be incorporated into conditions of
approval once the Planning Commission has provided direction
with regard to the design and grading issues.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
in a Dal Fee ort newspaper and all property owners within 300
® feet oft e su F ect site have been notified. In addition, public
hearing notices have been posted on the subject property. To date,
no correspondence either for or against this project has been
received.
V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
rev ew the architectural design and grading concept in conjunction
with the Design and Grading Committees' recommendations. The
Commission should reach a consensus on either to support or modify
the Design Review and Grading Committees' recommendations. In
either case, the public hearing should be continued to at least the
November 9, 1983 Planning Commission meeting to allow the applicant
time to finalize the project and to allow staff to
conditions for final consideration.
Respkctfully,5ubmitted,
Rick Gomez
City 'Planner
RG:CJ:jr
Attachments:
Exhibit
"A"
- Location Map
Exhibit
"B"
- Site Utilization Map
Exhibit
"C"
- Natural Features Map
Exhibit
"D"
- Site Plan
Exhibit
"E"
- Building_ Elevations
Exhibit
Exhibit
"F -
"G"
Conceptual Grading Plan
- Previously Approved Building Elevations
♦ I 11r _ 1 � 1 - �e +
1- 11
-•r. u:I Y
Ste [• t -�
1
LO''
-
_..
o
-._ 27126
NORTH-F- • -- '1' Js VV
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAi\'IONGA, zeroett aw
PL&NTNTL C DIVISION EXHIBIT- 'Fr`` SCALE- 8--E-5-
ALL
Ilk
If
oil
1°z�!I j % 1.iiiIII C
I -.�' ` \�'�1��� �• 1 y 1 // � % I i ! 1 II 111 j f
�m i';el � j�`�
I'i1133' R" f //1 /.�-
1 J
I r
i
1 a 1 V4n:41
11\ 1 i
i � c�iryl.�gi ti�,= �� °v�'o N 1 yr � I• ,�. / I� '\ � _ _'_
•
tas "I:it. �IyM J `ty L
CITY OF
RANCHO CUC N IO \ A Trl�l � :
s.,..a �
PLANNING DIVI.SON EXHIBIT- -*C—" SCALE- �.i.T.S.
i
• Lct �o l
,
a <
s'L •- ' F r ' `1r-
Zoe
a
.A T•
i > 'Mr�tC 1
- rp = A � y'.11 r
r
. n .
, aV
2
4W
K
CITY OF
R: NCHO CLCANMO\TGA
PLANNING DIVISION
' I
i
M1 `
f
''.}.�� -� t- �`�._•s �, t6�Y. J�s. '_ .sue
y-+5s. , cam. -�• S4` .a•
PAW YE. crlL:Jx msgK,yr
ITEM- G tCP SZ— lg—f/ercLUet�
TITLE, saw 7L4d
f ,.
EXHIBIT] it — SCALE- -
- Tl�
IYtN/1'IW
I �
(YC$t774
i
[ANC_ T /.0 •'C.•JS' (R: J)
�:UGGJ�
i
I
I�
i
:dn-
1V00J L A MAIM
. AS WILL'
9AsT L u
14 /Z N fN
I
t
SotTT#- �CN6WP1 �/
_ rWAM AS^ wA . COMNFCTe-0
TO MALL ZrRVCTURC
SIB[
CITY OF rrEm:c)ff -:�-
RNCHO CLTCA1'10 NC7A Ti y� cLie� -n�rES
PLANNING DIVISON EXHIBrr= � �� SCALD -
MH
E
C
CI'T'Y OF
RAINCHO
i,� fseE srfiEe-r !F: -3"
Ff:Ft g�1uP
CC;CkNIONGA
PLANNING DI'%rNON
NURTH
IT EN, I=
TIME: - �cADiNb i>441V
EY- '-iIBIT- [^ - I SCALE- -
i
O
N
ti
/
I /er
/W� W/ Blsy \
\ / Y
�r
J .1 /o/ T
i
41
�+.A/I`'' -
,.
i _• T h 4�' "A"
/N
/
A, 7n-;a Z 7
CITY OF
® RANCHO CUC4kMO\TCA
PLANNING DIVLSION
Ws m
1 %�4s
p_
C
e
C
t3 —! /IrO
IWRTH
S \
,�. •e \ \r�- -1
=o'
s'
�3C I ITN ` _
fjV i2 I
v� iw0 =77TiC�
i�
/
A, 7n-;a Z 7
CITY OF
® RANCHO CUC4kMO\TCA
PLANNING DIVLSION
Ws m
1 %�4s
p_
C
e
C
t3 —! /IrO
IWRTH
1 � �r- i�•� -I � Afn =l /68.30 �� \_ _'=�' t' \L•��-��`�" �,
I y, — -- ��c �._a— < "_moo• L• ,r__ '1� {1I
i I � _i r ni" --�! 1— �`r.'�[o .�$ly /Yy'YL'✓� I ,'.� - -� - _ _
I � � T -t. n.i000slo laraf .: -.rrfi �O'- l I• —. t „''�/..
WILSON
IflI ���fffjjj c.
2/4' 7 i� t
,� a• pia. �� � {� � `` ' � �� -- \- `� —�;fy f'� —� I,
4= 2
y� pU /tf /SLPY[C.� A•F
NOt(1t-j
N
CITY OF rrrtt=
® RANCHO CL(��IO \GA r<r�=
PLANNING I?I`.rL9DN' EXHIBITN ALE:
11
.w w... .wr— . ,.,.. �. ....— .�.i.......
NORTH ELEVATION
11
El1� ELEi6li1811
SOOTS ELEVATION
Illlil''��IIII�� �IkIIIII',��II '
WEST ELEVATION
EXTERIOR ELEVATION$
7)eEVKY.SCr �W.,,0 gEe3 Teirdrle')P�
IIIIIi�IIII i��i�I��ll I���III ul.raw.
EAST ELEVATION
j I
611 III IIII
II LId y1y IIII IIII LnJ l l II II IIILII
18M ELH HOM
CITY OF
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
EITERIolt s1 vilknaas
ITEM'[:
TITLE:�iV�s
EXHIBIT: SGALE: —`
aj
z
'o
J
a
J
O
O
V
NI
m
IL
fro
O
0
Q
Q
O.
h
J
3
�'III
I Ill�ull`N l�ill�,
Z
J
WEST
ELEVATION
�
J
O
O
Z
O
U5
\
4
Cl.
I.
T
v
MONTH
ELEVATION
EITERIolt s1 vilknaas
ITEM'[:
TITLE:�iV�s
EXHIBIT: SGALE: —`
aj
z
'o
J
a
J
O
O
V
NI
m
IL
fro
O
0
Q
Q
O.
h
J
3
E
r:
L
LJ
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 28, 1983
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
SY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: VARIANCE 83-04 - ROBERTS - A request to reduce the front,
rear, and si� eyard setbacks on a 3,280 square foot lot in
the R -3 zone located at the northeast corner of of
Amettyst and Monte Vista, 6969 Amethyst - APN 202 - 131 -04.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested, Approval of a variance to allow reduced
front, rear, an aide yard setbacks on a 3,280 square foot lot
B. Purpose: Construction of a 1297 sq. ft. two story single
fang residence
C. Location: Northeast corner of Amethyst Avenue and Monte Vista
treet
D. Parcel Size: 3,280 square feet
E. Existing Zoning: R -3
G. Surrounding
Land
Use and
Zonin
:
Nort -
ing a
amp 1Y
nome ,
zoned
R -3
South -
Single
family
homes,
zoned
R -3
East -
Single
family
homes,
zoned
R -3
West -
Single
family
homes,
zoned
R -1
H. General Plan Desi nations:
Project i-ce - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac)
North - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac), Low Medium
Residential (4 -8 du /ac)
South - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac)
East - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac)
Nest - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac)
I. Site Characteristics: The project site is currently vacant
with no significant vegetation.
ITEM E
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Variance 83 -04 /Roberts
September 28, 1983
Page 2
jj. AN-ALYSIS:
A. General: The applicant is requesting a 9 -foot variance for the
front yard setback along Monte Vista Street, a 12 -foot variance
for the rear yard setback !north property line), and a 2 -foot
variance for the interior side yard (east property line).
State law, as well as the City Zoning Ordinance, gives the
Planning cowlission the authority to approval a variance for
certain development standards, such as the above, only when
special circumstances applicable to the property such as size,
shape, or topography would create undue hardships. Also,
variances may be granted when the strict enforcement of the
Zoning Ordinance would result in practical difficulty or
unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the objectives of the
Zoning Ordinance.
An identical variance was approved by the Planning Commission
in 1981, but has since expired. During the review c the
previous variance, two major items were discussed including:
(1) the legality of the subject parcel; and, the design of
the home proposed by the previous applicant.
Attorney's office researched the subject property and
determined that it was a legal lot of record which was
subdivided prior to 1957 when no parcel map was required by the
County. Regarding the design of the house, the Planning
Commission approved the requested setbacks but required the
applicant to revise the elevations to meet their concerns.
C. Buildinq Desi r: As mentionea above, the Planning Commissiun
I not approve the previously proposed building elevations
shown on Exhibit "F ". The Commission was concerned with the
adverse visual impact created by the height and bulk of the two
story house combined with the reduced setbacks. In addition,
the Commission was concerned with the compatibility of the two
story house with the neighborhood and expressed a concern with
second story windows looking into adjacent yards. The
applicant for this project was made aware of the Commission's
previous concerns and designed a two story house with the upper
floor reduced in width. A steep pitched roof has been from provided
to help give the structure a one story app the
front elevation facing Amethyst Avenue and to resolve concerns
relative to adverse visual impacts.
Concerning the upper story windows, a one bedroom window is
indicated on the north side of the structure. The residents of
the house directly north of the site reviewed the development
plans and stated that the window was not a concern. However,
if the Commission feels the window is undesirable, an
alternative may be to revise the floor plan and provide a
dormer window on the west elevation facing Amethyst.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Variance 83 -04 /Roberts
September 28, 1983
Page 3
Recommended conditions of apprcval are shown on the attached
Resolution for your consideration.. Condition number one
requiring accent trim on the north elevation is suggested
because the side of the house will be visible from adj1cent
yards and from the street to a lesser extent. Other conditions
have also been prepared for your review requiring design rE iew
of any changes to the proposed exterier elevations, and
requiring an automatic garage door opener. This condition is
suggested because the proposed driveway is only about 15 feet
long from the house to the sidewalk.
C. Bu�ild�inq Setbacks: The site is located within the R -3 zone,
which requires a 25 -foot front yard setback for Monte Vista, a
15 -foot setback from Amethyst Street, a 20 -foot rear yard
setback from the north property line, and a 10 -foot interior
side yard setback from the east property line. The parcel
measures 50'X 65.6' (3,280 square feet) therefore the buildable
area within the above setbacks is limited to 25' X 20.61, or
500 square feet. In comparison, the minimum dimensions for
conforming lots in the R -3 zone are 80' X 100' (8,000 square
feet). Also, relative to lots in the immediate vicinity, the
subject property is approximately one -half the size.
® The size of the subject, property together with the required
setbacks limits the square footage of any one story house to be
constructed on the property. If the variance is approved as
requested, the building pad will total approximately 1107
square feet (20' X 41'11. The ironing Ordinance requires a two
car garage (approximately 400 square feet) therefore the
remaining area for a dwelling unit is only about 700 square
feet.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The size and shape of the subject property,
combined with the required buildini setbacks in the R -3 zone, does
create a practical hardship which is inconsistent with the intent
of the Zoning Ordinance. Also, the lot is unique to the
neighborhood in that it is approximately one -half the size of most
of the surrounding parcels. Based on these circumstances, approval
of the variznce could not be considered granting a special
privilege. In addition, it does not appear that approval of the
variance would be detrimental to the public, safety, or general
welfare of the community for the surrounding area.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
in The Dail Report and public hearing notices have been mailed to
23 property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. To date,
no correspondence has been received for or against this project.
E
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
variance 83 -04 /Roberts
September 28, 1983
Page 4
�. Rm) ENDP.TION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission
cons der a input and elements of this variance. If after such
consideration the Cornission can support the facts fir findings,
adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate.
G
liv ,submitted,
anner
.i:Jl
777 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Zoning and General Plan
Exhibit "B" - Assessor's Parcel Map
Exhibit "C" - Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations
Exhibit "E" - Floor Plans
Exhibit "F" - Previous Design - Not Approved
Resolutio,j of Approval with Conditions
C
l J
E
0
E
VAN 1 M&
1Q
CITY OF
Rrs,1CHO CLC.A.N,10\GA,
Pi.AN\TNI \'G DIVISION\
ITEM: VA.s?-
NORTH
MUM W SCALE --
n
CITY OF
�► R ECHO CLG -k`IO:NGA
PLAIINNIN'G DIN NT
Y v
NORM
ITE1I: 'yPt�3 a`i 'R� =----
JTJU,
EtHIBIT: SCALE
0
J'C6
06
C9 OV
V!STA
- -•.
o
:ti
i
.
P. 4
•
-: 1
8
t 10
i2
CITY OF
�► R ECHO CLG -k`IO:NGA
PLAIINNIN'G DIN NT
Y v
NORM
ITE1I: 'yPt�3 a`i 'R� =----
JTJU,
EtHIBIT: SCALE
�i ^Y !•Of�tCi°'2Oy�. {I .. _ —� «iii.
r:
ldeoSt -- lt�. f SIDE
;yicT a�`� ,� r� ✓
r� .pZfj, ice^ 1�
I- \
TE ��TA ��Ji►Z -cET
{
s
I
es' 03C:
NORTH
®
CITY � � �i=
NGA = Hp CC10��t /A83 -e7i
EXHt
PLANNI'CG DiVLSON' ffiT=� -SOLE
L
El
1
N
e_
CITY OF ITEM
R� \GIGO � CAIvIC»GA, TITLE= _
P L. A. 'v;�;L \'G DIVLSIOV
EXHIBIT- SCALE-
11
11
1
r rI
.� 111
1-- e'orrJE-
i
f
}
V•C� .%'• ..l.3
CITY '%V T1t: VAS3 -ff - �r � %Iff
`NCHO C CANIONGA TFFLE:PXQMcLn 'te4 .
/kfl°i2dfm
PLAllNNLNG DINrISIDN EXHIBIT: %r-" - S; ALE: =
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 83 -04 TO REDUCE THE FRONT, REAR,
AND SIDE YARD SETBACKS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
AMETHYST AVENUE AND MONTE VISTA STREET IN THE R -3 ZONE
WHEREAS, on the 25th day of August, 1983, an application was filed
and accepted on the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 28th day of September, 1983, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the
California Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following's ngs:
1. That strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of the specified regulation would result
in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the
Zoning Code.
2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary
® circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property involved or to the inttennded s to ° other
property that do not appiy generally
properties in the same zone.
3. That strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the same zone.
4. That the granting of the Variance will not
constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent
with the limitations on other properties classified
in the same zone.
5. That the granting of the variance will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
SECTION 2: Variance No. 83 -04 is hereby approved subject to all of
the following n itions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. The north elevation shall be provided with accent
trim similar to that shown on the south elevation.
Resolution No.
Page 2
E
2. An automatic garage door opener shall be ii:s *.ailed
prior to final inspection of the proposed house.
3. Any exterior revisions to the building design, other
than those required by the Planning Commission,
shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review
Committee prior to issuance of building permits.
4. This :variance approval shall expire, unless extended
by the Planning Ce =ission, if building permits are
not issued within two (2) years from the date of
approval.
APPROVED A@ ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST -
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passe, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COt+L^4ISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CITY OF RANCHO CUC 9MONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 28, 1983
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Rick Marks, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND r�FNFRAL PLAN AMEN
r.-P91m,
M- %,MM8LL1M11 111 V LJ I19C1\ I J - M F- t:4UCD L W 0111UHU LPIC 17enerd I
an Lan Use an rom Low Residential (2 -4 du/ac) to
Medium Residential (4-14 du /ac) on approximately 7.9 acres
of land located on the south side of Highland Avenue
between Jasper and Carnelian Streets - APN 201 - 214 -08.
En 1MUI1rICI\IML MJJCJJI'ICi \1 AI\U LUAC I.nAnnt OJ -UJ - LAKNtLl/in
INVESTMENTS - A resquest- for a change of zone from
R-1-8,500 T6-R-3 (Multiple Family) on 7.9 acres of land
located on the south side of Highland Avenue between
Jasper and Carnelian Streets - APN 201 - 214 -08.
L]
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: To change the General Plan Land Use Plan
Tr Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) to Medium Residential (4 -14
du!ac).
To change the City zoning map from R -1 -8500 to R -3 (Multiple
Family Residential).
B. Location: South side of Highland Avenue between Jasper and
Carnelian
D. Parcel Size: 7.9 acres
E. Existing Zoning: R -1 -8500
F. Existing Land Use: Vacant, undeveloped
G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin
North - Residential, R -1- 10,000
South - Residential, R -1 -8500
East - Vacant, undeveloped, R -1 -8500
West - Vacant, undeveloped, R -1 -8500
E
ITEMS F & G
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 83 -04 A - ZC 83 -03 1CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS
September 28, 1983
Page 2
Ll
H. General
Plan Desi�rcations:
North
- Low
ReN ena tia—
2 -4
du /ac)
South
- Low
Residential
(2 -4
du /ac)
East
- Low
Residential
(2 -4
duio =)
West
- Low
Residential
(2 -4
du /ac)
I. Site Characteristics: Generally a flat site sloping gently in
a southerly erection; no structures; some low growing weeds
asd grasses.
II. ANALYSIS•
A. General: The analysis of an amendment to the Land Use Plan
generraa Ty focuses upon surrounding land use compatibility,
General Plan land use goals and policies, and potential
environmental impacts.
This site already has an approved tract map for a custom
subdivision of 29 lots (Tract 9659) serviced by four cul -de -sac
streets and Jasper Street.
The planning area affected is developed or planned as a single
family residential area serviced by retail uses located at the
corners of 19th Street and Carnelian Street. Planning in the
area and along the subj,.:.t site is sensitive due to its
proximity to the Foothill Freeway corridor.
B. General Plan Land Use Goals and Policies: The General Plan
describes Low, Low Medium, and Me ium Residential in the
foliowing way:
Low (2 -4 dwelling units per gross acre). The low density
residential classification is characterized by single family
homes. The density is appropriate where the traditional
neighborhood character of detached single family units prevails
and where the level of services including roads, shopping and
recreation are not sufficient to justify a higher density.
Low Medium (4 -8 dwelling units per gross acre). The low - medium
category is characterized by residential densities somewhat
greater than the low density residential group. With gross
densities averaging between 5 -8 dwelling units per acre,
considerably more housing types may be used, including typical
single family, single family zero lot line, duplex, and under
certain conditions, up to 4 -6 townhouse -type units. This
category would be appropriate within low density areas to
encourage greater housing diversity without changing the single
family character of the surrounding residential character.
11
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 83 -04 A - ZC 83 -03 /CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS
September 28, 1583
Page 3
Medium (4 -14 dwelling units per gross acre). The medium
eUensi y residential classification allows a range of living
accommodations ranging from conventional single family units
and mobile homes to townhouses. Building intensity at the
lower end of the density range would be appropriate adjacent to
low and very low density residential areas. Housing types
would still be characterized primarily by detached housing
units. Building intensity at the higher end of the range is
more appropriate adjacent to parks and other open spaces along
transit routes and major and secondary thoroughfares, and near
activity centers such ;s recreational centers, libraries,
shopping centers and entertainment areas. Develcoment of this
level of intensity would normally be semi - detached or attached
units.
Medium density residential also serves as a buffer between low
density residential areas and areas of higher density, and
commercial activities and areas of greater traffic and noise
levels.
Medium residential densities shall be designated, wherever
possible, along transit routes and thoroughfares and near
activity centers such as recreational areas, libraries,
shopping centers and entertainment areas. Development should
be designed to allow densities of at least 8 dwelling units per
gross acre within 1,000 feet of a transit corridor. This
ensures that residents are within a comfortable walking
distance from public transit and that there will be a
sufficient number of people along the corridor to support
transit.
C. Reasons for Requested Action: The applicant has submitted a
meter outlining the pT urpose for the land use plan and zone
change (Exhibit °B °). The primary reasons for the requested
change are the site's proximity to the Route 30 freeway
right -of -way and the locat;on of the proposed freeway on -ramp.
D. Issues For Consideration:
The applicant proposes a .completely enclosed project that
would not connect with the existing single family
residential area. Is this desirable or should all land uses
in the area relate to each other?
o Should the City's P.D. process be used to develop this
parcel and if so, should the City postpone the request for a
zone change?
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 83 -04 A - ZC 83 -03 /CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS
September 28, IS33
Page 4
o Will an increase in density to Medium Residential set a
precedent for other sites situated along the Route 30
corridor and if so, is this the land use the City would
recommend as a buffer between the Route 30 freeway and
single family units?
The General Plan calis for medium density residential to
serve as a buffer between low density residential areas and
areas of greater traffic and noise levels.
E. Impacts of Proposed General Plan Amendment: The major planning
impact of an increase in density for the subject property is
the potential for the new density range to set a precedent for
all of the properties in Rancho Cucamonga along the Route 30
corridor that are similarly planned for Low Residential, and
face the same problems associated with development projects
along the proposed freeway corridor.
While the General Plan does state that Medium Residential
serves as a buffer between Low density residential areas and
areas of greater traffic and noise levels in many areas of the
City, the existing Land Use Map does not reflect this policy.
If the amendment is approved, other prop_ �y owners wits.
similarly planned, zoned, and undeveloped land may use this
decision as justification, for increases in density on their
property. The net result will be an increase in the population
of the City living north of the proposed Route 30 freeway along
the Freeway corridor, and a significant change in land use
characteristics reflecting an increase in density along the
corridor. Therefore, the major impact of this amendment is one
of policy and possible precedent within the Route 30 corridor.
On -site impacts of the requested amendment include an increase
in resident population and an increase in localized traffic on
Highland Avenue.
Environmental impacts are not significant and are analyzed in
Section "F ".
F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been
completed by the applicant. Staff has completed the
environmental checklist (Part II of the Initial Study) and
found no significant adverse environmental impacts attributable
to the propose3 amendment. While no significant environmental
impacts are expected, the proposed land use change would have
the following impacts:
L.
11
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 83 -04 A - ZC 83- 031CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS
September 28, 1983
Page 5
Ask
o On -site dwelling unit and population density will double
dwelling units and population in the planning area will
increase.
E
o The proposed General Plan ar.endment is consistent with the
land use as called for in the existing General Plan, but is
inconsistent with the currently planned density range for
the area.
If the Commission chooses to recommend approval of this
amendment, ii, is suggested that issuance of a Negative
Declaration be recommended to the City Council.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Following are the findings required to be made
or approval of t is amendment.
A. The amendment does not conflict with the lard use policies of
the General Plan.
B. The amendment promotes the goals of the Land Use Element.
C. The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental
to adjacent propoerties.
The Commission must examine .and decide:, wh "her; the from _
Low Residential to_ Medit§:.Residentiai i ti604 praaaW' the 'And' use ;.
goals and .purposes of tte''Czeneraf Plan and whetiier,tfiis as ridmw.t,.:'
wbitld
be iaate' ' 1, y: detr,.4*ii1taY,, � .64jacent . pr -oPer 3es , or `..;cause
significant adverse environmental impacts as listed in "C" above.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices
were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the subject
property.
V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
conduct a public hearing and receive all public input on this
matter. if the Commission finds that the requested amendment and
zone change are consistent with the General Plan goals and
policies, a recommendation to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan
should be forwarded to the City Council. If these findings cannot
be met tc the Commission's satisfaction, a recommendation of denial
to the Ci"y Council would be appropriate.
PLANKING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 83 -04 A - ZC 33 -03 /CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS
September 28, 1983
Page 5
o On -site dwelling unit and population density will double
dweiling units and population in the planning area will
increase.
o The proposed General Plan amendment is consistent with the
land usg as called for in the existing General Plan, but is
inconsistent with the currently planned density range for
the area.
If the Commission chooses to recommend approval of this
amendment, it is suggested that issuance of a Negative
Declaration be recommended to the City Council.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Following are the findings required to be made
for approval of this amendment.
A. The amendment does not conflict with the land use policies of
the General Plan.
B. The amendment promotes the goals of the Land Use Element.
C. The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental
to adjacent propoerties.
This amendment would not be materially detrimental to adjacent
properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts as
listed in °C° above. The Commission must examine and decide
whether the amendment from Of`ice to Neighborhood Commercial would
promote the land use goals and purposes of the General Plan.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
in The Daly Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices
were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the subject
property.
V. RECu?%YENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
conduct a public hearing and receive all public input on this
matter. If the Commission finds that the requested amendment and
zone change are consistent with the General Plan goals and
policies, a recimmendation to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan
should be forwarded to the City Council. If these findings cannot
be met to the Commission's satisfaction, a recommendation of denial
to the City Council would be appropriate.
tfuI ly,,wabmitted,
Rick GkQW"
City Planner
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 83 -04 A - ZC 83 -03 /CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS
September 28, 1983
Page o
_ Attachments: Exhibit "A¢ - Loc? ion Map
Exhibit "B" - LetLer from Applicant
Initial Study
Resolution - General Plan Amendment (Denying)
Resolution - Genera: Plan Amendment (Approving)
z
E
L-1
Li
r..
R R
S
.r rso F.prc
SSgop.9y./sn1c.-
c -r
l�..rnerro�
1iYi-;,
t -s
�a�sifl� /GiO�
{
.cs
7�f
Law C.o�snJ.
tfxo�f j
j
Imo_
1
ii;Ydnf
1
Lo,.. -Ocnvy
!
i
= �- �dyvst�ur�
i
� Pc�
1 }
S� csmr:
`i
♦ P � 1
attachment "a"
L-4:1 i
i
attachment "b"
G. DOUGLAS GORGEN
ATTORNEY AT LAW
:333 HELUA^24 AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730
TELEPHONE (714) 987
June 28, 1 1083
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
P.O. BOX 807
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91701
Re: Request for General Plan Amendment /Zone Change
SkC Carnelian Ave. & Highland Ave.
Carnelian Investments- -Owner
Gentlemen.:
We are requesting a ge,Ieral plan amendment and zone change for
the property we own located between Carnelian Ave. and Jasper
south of Highland Ave. abutting the future Rte. 30 freeway right -
of -way. The property is approximately seven (7) acres in size
and is currently general planned and zoned for low density resi-
dential housing (R -1 8,500) lots. The property is vacant and is
relatively flat, surrounded by vacant property on the east, west,
and south, with undeveloped R -1 8,500 lots on the north above
Highland Avenue. The vacant property to the south is the future
Rte. 30 freeway right -of -way abutting the entire south boundary
of the property.
At the time the freeway is developed, the west on -ramp to the
freeway will adjoin the property's southern boundary for almost
the entire length of the property. it is for the reason of the
location of the freeway right -O. -way and the freeway on -ramp
that we request the general plan amendment and zone change to
medium density residential (4 -14 units). More specifically, our
reasons are as follows:
The existing zoning of R -I 8,500 will result in a resi-
dential development with numerous short cul -de -sacs and
14 of the possible 29 lots with their back yards exposed to
the on -ramp of the freeway. Even with a screen w� ' -And
landscaping, there will be noise problems and a V un-
attractive situation for the respective homeowner_. Motor -
ists on the freeway will be viewing the City as a series
of residential backyards
2. From an economic standpoint, there
of problems that make the property d�
with the existing zoning. The home°
('Z the tract) will be difficult to
are a combination
icult to develop
ng the freeway
and will bring
Page 2
a lower price, while at the same time, these homes will be
more expensive to build. 'With screen walls, sound insula-
tion, double paned windows, and landscaping to make the
homes more compatible with the freeway location, the cost
of these homes will be increased. Also, there is a require-
ment to install a link of the master plan of drainage that
_ runs the entire length of the property. The freeway loca-
tion has made this necessary, and it adds to the cost of
developing the property.
A possible solution would be to develop very inexpensive
homes on the property. It would be impractical, with the
restraints caused by the freeway, to hope to sell the same
level of quality home that presently exists in the tracts to
the north.
The general plan amendment and zone change wouid allow a develop-
ment that would have the following advantages to all parties
involved:
1. A better planned and-more attractive development could
be built that would act as a buffer between the freeway and
the low density homes to the north.
2. The medium density development would provide the City
with more affordable housing. There exists in close proxim-
ity to the property medium density development and four
shopping centers at the •.ntersection of 14th Street and
Carnelian Avenue.
3. The project would be completely enclosed and self -�� ^-
tained between Highland Ave. and the freeway on the north
and south; and between Carnelian Ave. and Jasper St. on the
east and west. The development would not adjoin or connect
with any existing or future low density development around it.
The property is more or less an island along the freeway
between major streete-
4. Economically, the medium density development could justify
the cost of buffering the residents of the development from
the freeway. A medium density project along a major freeway
on -ramp in the City would be very rentable. This type of
development has been used in other areas and is successful
and acceptable to renters. Also, the development could better
afford the cost of installing the necessary drainage system
through the property.
5. A medium density project would be a more appropriate
development for the freeway exposed property, and a more
attractive place for the residents of the development in
which to live. There would be an all around better atmo-
sphere and street scene for the neighbors of the property.
As a buffer to the freeway, the image of the City visible
from the freeway would be enhanced. The City should not
Page 3 l
t.
allow what has become an eyesore elsewhere along freeway
corridors, a Iona series of exposed residential backyards.
For the above reasons, we respectfully request the general plan
amendment and zone change. If additional or supplemental inform-
ation is ne ssary, we will be happy to supply it_ Thank you for
your courtesy and cooperation in this matter.
CDG:vr
gespeJctT,ul ly, /J
V r �Y'i �, 4&
C. Douglas Go gen, Partr, r
Carnelian Ir. sctments
C
I-]
F7 _1
LJ
e.i-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
LA
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee thzough the department where the
project,applicatior_ is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the Public meeting at which time the
Project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi-
ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration
will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant
environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report
will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report
should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa-
tion concerning the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS
_ 888 N. Main Street Ste_ 801 Santa Ana,,, Ca. 92701
f7141 543 -9259 or 7140 987 6328
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: C. DOUGLAS GORGEN
6632 Carnelian Avenue2 Aita Loma Ca 91701 714) 98 6328
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREE_ ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
SW Corner of Carnelian Ave. 8 Hi hiand Ave.
Parcel No. 201 - 214 -08
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, S -'ATE ANi7
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUC PERMITS:
NONE
I -1
A'-REAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS - ,
IF ANY :_ the arocc
- u-3P�nYi--°ataly 7 a� 1 3 of tfie n
roDert
Proposing y p We
9 an specific structures at this time.
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON T SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
ANimALS, ANY CULTURAL, POGRAPHy, PLANTS (TREES),
OF SURROUNDING PROPRERTIFSSTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS r
EXISTING AND THE DESCRIPTION r r USE
STRUCTURES AND TEE!R USE !ATTACH NE G ANY
CES -4nRV c:- ......._.
IS the project part of a larger project, one of a series
Of cumulative actions, whit*,. although individual3y srna ll,
may as a whole have significant environmental impactP
NO
1 -2
E
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
X
1.
Create a substantial change
in
ground
_
contours?
X
2.
Create a substantial change
in
existing
_
noise or vibration?
X
3.
Create a substantial change
in
demand for
_
municipal services (police,
fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
X
4.
Create changes in the existing
zoning or
general plan designations?
X S. Remove any, existing trees? How many?
_ X 5. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
4_ This is a request for a aeneral Plan amendment and
zone chance to Permit medium density residential
r,
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the c-nstruction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements
furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data ai-d information required for this initial evaluation
to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional
information may be required to be submi%,ted before an adequate
evaluation can be made by the Develogmen� Review Conp.ttee.
Date June 28, 1983 Signature
. uougias Sjorgen
Title General Partnek
Carnelian Investments
I- 3
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
* *NOT APPLICABLE
The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucaro:.7a
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school
district to acconLr iodate the proposed residential development.
Nar..e of Developer and Tentative Tract No.:
Specific Location of Project:
1. Number of single
fami lv units:
2. N-,: ^.ber of multiple
family units:
3. Date proposed to
begin construction:
4. Earliest date of
occupancy:
Model
and # of Tentative
S. Bedrooms Pric . Rang,,
PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3
I -4
PHASE 4
TOTAL
0
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOD -UTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOIRNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 83 -04A - CARNELIAN Iir','ESTMENTS, TC AMEND THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE PLAN FROM LOW RESnCUTT (2 -4
DU /AC) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -14 DU/AC) ON
APPROXIMATELY 7.9 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN JASPER AND CARNELIAN STREETS -
APN 201- 214 -08
WHEREAS, the Planning Ccmmission 1:ld a public hearing on September
28, 1983 to censidEr General Piaa Amendment 83 -04H; Zed
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has heard and consider--d all public
testimony regarding the amendment.
wOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission approves
General Plan Amendment 83704A based on thz following findings:
A. The amendment conforms with the residential land use
policies of the General Plan.
8_ The amendment is consistent with and promotes the
® goals of the Lard Use Element.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C -TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST: —
Secretary of the P.0 ling Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutio:' was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the'
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RE'OLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANI,,: CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAIT
AMEN)P'ENT 83 -04A - CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS, TO AMEND THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE PLAN FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2 -'
DU /AC) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -14 DU /AC) ON
APPROXIMATELY 7.9 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN JASPER AND CARNELIAN STREETS -
APN 201 - 214 -08
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing (in September
28, 1983 to conside- Gene:-al Plan Amendment 83 -04A; and
WHEREAS, the Finning Commission has heard and considered all public
testimony regarding the amendment.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission denies
General Plan Amendment 33-04A based on the following findings:
A. The amendment does not conform with the residential
land use policies of the General Plan.
B. The amendment does not promote the goals of the Land
Use Element.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983.
PLANNING CUdMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ! "11CAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary o` the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAP% Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City or Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was G-uly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of S_ptember, 1483, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTIONi NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ZONE CHANGE 83 -03 -
CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS TO A CHANGE OF ZONE PROM R -1 -8500
TO R -3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY) ON 7.9 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN JASPER AND
CARNELIAN STREETS - APN 201 - 214 -08
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on
September 28, 1983 tc consider Zone Change 83 -03: and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has heard and considered all public
testimony rejarding the zone change.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission denies
Zone Change 83 -03 based on the following findings:
A. The Zone Change does not conform with the residential
land use policies of the General Plan.
C. The Zone Change does not promote the goals of the
Land Use Element.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983.
PLA:'IING CO.I.dISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: _
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST: T_
Secretary of the Planning Commission
1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of September, 1983, by th,; following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIGNERS:
E
0
i
DATE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September ZP. 198--
TO: Chairn;an and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: RiCK Gomez, City Planner
BY: ?ick Marks, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -048
- SYCAMOR. INVESTMENTS - fi request to amend the General
Pian Land Use Plan from Office to Neighborhood Com ercial
on approximately 5.44 acres of land located at the
northeast corner of Archibald and Base Lire - APN
202 - 181 -27.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 83 -04 B -
SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS - A request for a change of zone from
A- A ministrative and Professional) to C -1 (Neighbor0od
Commercial) on 5.44 acres of land located at the northeast
corner of Archibald and Base Line - APN 202 - 181 -27.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: To change t °ie General Plar. Land Use Map for
subject site from Office to Neighborhood Commercial.
To change the zoning on subject site from A -P to C -1.
3. Purpose: Broaden the range of allowable retail and co-=,ercial
uses.
C. Location: Northeast corner of Archibald and Base Line
D. Parcel Size: 5.44 acres
E. Existing Zoninq: A -P (Administrative Professional)
F. Existing Land Use: Vacant, undeveloped
G. Surroundin Land Use and Zonin :
North an
- Vact - R /PD TT 11797 - 240 condo units)
South - Co mnercial - C -2
cast - Vacant - R -3 (TT 11797 - 240 condo units)
West - Commercial - C -1
ITEMS H & I
RESOLUTI;N NO-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
RANCHO ;UCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APP�ROVINGOZONE OF THE CHANGE I8 -03 OF
- CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS TO A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R -1 -8500
TO R-3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY) ON 7,9 ACRES Of' LAND LOCATE:.' ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN JASPER AND
CARNELIAN STREETS - APN 201- 214 -08
Se }e,,.be ^JHEREAS' the Planning Coarission has held a public hearing on
P - 28, _9.,3 to cons.der Zone Change 83 -03; and
,4a =REAS, the Planning COM ,ssion has heard and considered all public
testimony re3arding the zone change.
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission a
7cne Charge 83 -03 based on the following findings: pproves
A The Zone Change conforms wit: the residential land
use policies of the General Plan -
C goals of e the nge is ro=s -meat. with, and promotes the
Land Use llrnent.
APPROVED AND ADOPTFj Th1J 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. is
PLANNING COMMISSION OF ;'!E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY-
Dernnis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the P annin
9 Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning C
Cucamor•9a, do hereby certify that the of the City
regularly introduced foreqoing Resolution wa Of an
City of Rancho C amongaa5at a regularpmeetiny the Planning and
On the 28th day of September, 1933 t g of the Planning Comm o Co�rrsion of the the following vote -tc -wit: ss on held
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
u
v
J
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
September
28,
1983
TO:
Chairman
and
Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Pick Gomez, City Planner
Br: Rick Marks, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
83 -048
SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS - A request to amena the generai
Plan Land Use Plan from Office to Neighborhood Commercial
on apprcximately 5.44 acres of land located at `.he
northeast corner of Archibald and Base Line - APN
202 - 181 -27.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 83 -04_ B -
SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS - A request for a change of zone from
A- Aomin�strative and Professional) to C -1 (Neighborhood
Commercial) on 5.44 acres of land located at the northeast
corner of Archibald and Base Line - APN 202 - 181 -27.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested- To change the General Plan Land Use Map for
subject site -ram Office to Neighborhood Commercial.
To change the zoning on subject site from A -P to C -1.
B. Purpose: Broaden the range of allowable retail and commercial
uses.
C. Location: Northeast corner of Archibald and Base Line
D. Parcel Size: 5.44 acres
E. Existing Zoning: A -P (Administrative Professional)
F. Existing Land Use: Vacant, undeveloped
G. Surrounding Lard Use and Zonin
North - Vacant - R %PD TT _ i97 - 240 condo units)
South - Commercial - C -2
East Vacant - R -3 (TT 11797 - 240 condo units)
Nest - Commercial - C -1
ITEMS H 8 I
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 83 -04 B /ZC 83 -04 B - Sycamc Investments
September 28, 1983
Page 2
c
N. Existing Surrounding General Plan
North - Medium Residential {4 =i
South - Neighborhood Commercial
East - Low Medium (4 -8 du /ac)
'West - Neighborhood Commercial
1. Site Characteristics: Generally a flat aria with low growing
grasses; no structures.
Ii. ANALYSIS:
A. General: the analysis of an amendment to the land use plan
generafTy focuses upon surrounding land use compatibility,
General Pjan land use and goals and policies, and potential
environmental impacts.
The subject site is iinmediately surrounded by Nediam
residential uses and has an approved tract map (Tract 11797)
for 240 condominium u.aits. The site is also located on a
corner which already has three neighborhood commerc-iil centers.
B. Reasons for Requested Change ir. Lard Use Category: The reasons
or requesting a change in l.ano use from office to Neighborhood
Commercial as provided by the applicant are to broaden the
range of allowed commercial activities on site and the stated
inability of the applicant to ma_ket the site for office
development.
C. General Plan Land Use Goals and Policies: The General Plan
policies governing Neigh orhoa -Cammercia clearly state that
"no more than two canters shall be developed at aach designated
intersecLiJn". The intersection of Archibald and Base Line
already has three such centers. The current land use
designation attached to the site (Oftice) does allow commercial
uses including restaurant, pharmacy, and business support
services.
D. Issues for Consideration:
o Considering the General Plan policy (page 36) restricting
the nimbers of neighborhood commercial centers to two per
designated intersection
- Does the policy require revision by the City'
- Does the Planning Commission feel that this particular
intersection merits an exception to the policy?
- Vhat a:a the long — rangy coisequences to the City of
granting an exception to the policy or eliminating it?
2
11
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 83 -04 BIZC 83 -04 B - Sycamore Investments
September 28, 1S83
Page 3
o Is there a need for additional retail and drive- through
commercial space at this intersection?
o The office designation does allow commercial activities.
p Is this site appropriate for office uses and what are the
long -term needs for office in the City?
o Is the fact that the site has not developed a result of the
recent recession in the overall economy of the nation or
the result of an inappropriate General Plat: designation?
o Has the applicant_ presented sufficient data to the City
in.iicating a need for a General Plan change?
Imracts of the Proposed General Plan Amendment: The impacts of
the proposed amendment to the Genera Plan pose a poi,cy
question for the City. Page 36 of the General Plan clearly
calls for a limitation on neighborhood centers to a maximum of
two '21 per designated intersection. The requested amendment
i�, in direct contraiention of that policy. if an :exception to
granting except9onsfor elsewhereroin ttheh City cnowntand in set
the
future.
lie corner of Base Line and Archibald lica�trhasypresentedeno
developed as a commercial area, the app
data showing that the market in 4.his area requires or can
support a new commercial center or that the uses now permitted
uv'er the office designation are insufficient to meet whatever
need does exist.
During the public hearings held on the General Plan, this site
was discussed by the Planning ComMission. At twat time the
Cammission determined that due to the fact that the
intersection of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road already had
Three Neighborhood
Con nercial centers and in light of the
General Plan": proposed policy limitation of two such centers
at any desigratVi intersection, another neighborhood center was
inappropriate. i5ecause the intersection was felt to be too
busy for residential +ises, office uses were deemed to be the
most appropriate for the site. Office was considered to be the
most flexible and appropriate long -term land use given the
City's policy, the existing there centers at that intersection,
and the size and shape of the par c: l.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF kEPOPT
GPA 83 -04 BjZC 83 -04 B - Sycamore Investments
September 28, 1983
Page 4
The land use impacts of this amendment will be most sharply
felt on the property directly to the north and east of the
site; Tract 11797, an approved 24Ll condominium project, is
located on this site. The impacts of the amendment on the
project can, through design techniques, be minimized to an
acceptable level, but wi11 include noise, traffic, and
pedestrian activity.
F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been
competed y the applicant. Staff has completed the
environmental checklist (Part II of the Initial Study) and
found no significant adverse environmental impacts attributable
TO the proposed amendment. While no significant environmental
impacts are expected, the proposed land use change would have
the following impacts:
o The requested change from Office lard use designation to
Neighborhood Commercial is in direct contravention to the
policy contained in the General Plan which states that "no
r..ore thar. two (Neighborhood Co nmercial) centers shall be
developed at each designated intersection ".
o The proposal w FJ result in an increased number of vehicle
trips to the site beyond what a project developed under the
Office designation would generate and will therefore
require a greats.: number of on -site parking spaces and,
more importantly, increase traffic hazards to other
vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians.
o Because of the increased intensity of activities associated
•iith the shopping center, office, and related uses, and
..sidering the increase in traffic to and from the site,
there will be an increase in ambient noise levels.
If the Planning CoMmission chooses to recommend approval of
this amendment, it is recommended that issuance of a Negative
Declaration be reco;amended to the City Council.
E
I.I.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 83 -04 B /ZC 83 -04 8 - Sycamore Investments
September 28, 1983
Page 5
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Following are the findings required to be made
or approval of is amendment:
A. The amendment does ^ot conflict with the land use policies of
the General Plan.
IV.
B. The amendment proFOtes the goals of the Land Use Element.
C. The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental
to adjacent properties.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
in a Dan y Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices
were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the subject
property.
ENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Conanissice.
rAgnylthis request for a General Plan amendment and zone change on
07 rounds that they are inconsistent with the policies of the
General Plan and that insufficient evidence was presented to the
C44 on which to base a decision to change the General Plan or
Zoning Ordinance. If the Commission finds that the requested
amendment is consistent with General Plan goals and policies, a
recommendation of approval should be forwarded to the City
Council. If these findings cannot be net to the Commission's
satisfaction, a recommendation of denial to the City Council would
be appropriate.
Redeetful ly/dubmi teed,
"ty'Planner
:RM:jr
G
ttachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "C" - Excerpt from General Plan
Initial Study
Resolution - General Plan Amendment (Denying)
Resolution - General Plan P.mendment (Approving)
Resolution - Zone Change (Approving)
Resolution - Zone Gzange (Denying)
n
E
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 83 -04 B /ZC 83 -04 B - Sycamore Investments
September 28, 1983
Page 5
Ill. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Following are the findings required to be made
for approve+ o. this amendment:
A. The amendment does not conflict with the land use policies of
the General Plan.
S. The amendment promotes the goals of the Land Use Element.
C. The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental
to adjacent properties.
This amendment would not be materially detrimental to adjacent
properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts as
listed in "C" above. The Commission must examine and decide
whether the amendment from Offic^ to Neighborhood Commercial would
promote the land use goals and purposes of the General Plan.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
in The Dai y Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices
were sent to property owners wit;-,in 300 feet of the subject
property.
V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
deny this request for a General Plan amendment and zone change on
the grounds that they are inconsistent with the policies of the
General Plan and that insufficient evidence was presented to the
City oti which to base a decision to change the General Plan or
Zoning Ordinance. If the Commission finds that the requested
amendment is consistent with General Plan goals and policies, a
recommendation of approval should be forwarded to the City
Council. If these findings cannot be met to the Commission's
satisfaction, a recommendation of denial to the City Council world
be appropriate.
kes tfull ubmitted,
Rick S011 --1
i+
City Planner
RG:RM:jr
i ttachments: Exhibit "A" - Lonation Map
Exhibit "B" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "C" - Excerpt from General Plan
Initial Study
Resolution - General Plan Amendment (Denying)
Resolution - General Plar. Amendment (Approving)
Resolution - Zone Change Approving)
Resolution - Zone Change Denying)
.l;+vbJ ,4c�L.t...y�.e cltMrdV.iC .sr
3ra +ro�br
tI u
r-
r
v �
azza.cnment a
i
s
I
e �
t
�u
i=y
t
t�
filr
Tti
1v1
7
Ij r
A
DIVERSIFIED
INVESTMENT
COMPANY
C attachment "b"
270 S eRISTOL STREET. SUITE 201. COSTA MESA. CALIFORNIA 92626 (714) 957 -2651
July 11, 1083
Mr. jack yam
Community Development Directcr
CITY OF RPN'CHO CUCAMONGA
P.O. Box 793
Rancho Cuca- monga, California 91730
Re: General Plan Amendment
and Zone Change
NEC Archibald and Baseline
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Dear Jack:
We feel that the recuested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change
would not have a significant adverse impact on either the immediate
area or the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Since the property is now zoned Administrative /Professional, which
permits financial institutions and restaurants, changing the zone
to a commercial designation which would basically allow retail,
commercial and drive - through facilities, would not significantly
intens=ify the uses proposed or the traffic generated.
Within the last two years since the adoption of the original
City Master Plan, there has been a tremendous evolution in the
office building marketplace, both nationally and locally. I
would respectfully submit to you that, during this period of
time, the planned office projects on Foothill, in and about
the new City Hall location, is much more attractive to office
users and lenders willing to firance office space than the
Administrative /Professional designated on this site.
JT:sc
Sincerely yours,
DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENT COMPANY FOR
SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS
�71 1
Jack Tarr
General Partner
DIVERSIF!ED
i
INVESTMENT
i j COMPANY
270 S gRISTO; STREET. SUITE 207. COSTA MESA. CALIFORNIA 92626 47'4) 957 -265'
Pr V
July 11, 19 0,3 r - C nn:. ITrP%
:sir.
Jack Lam A`4 ,q 9 ti c.i`fi�i
�Q
Community Development Direotor T1 aJiGyi�i�'tul'l i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P.O. Sox 793
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: General Plan Amendment
and Zone Change
NEC Archibalc: and Baseline
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Dear Jack:
Pursuant to our discussion, enclosed is t'•::: fo
to be submitted for the General Plan Airandment
requirements. As we had discussed, I am using
cation for both the General Plan Amendment and
Enclosed is the following:
Llowing information
and Zone Change
one Uniforsr Appli-
the Zone C:_ange.
1. Site Plan
2. Written Justification
3. "xll transparency reduction of the Site Plan
4. Part I of the T_nitiai Study
5, Fees for both the General Plan Amendment and the Zone Change
calculated �s follows:
General Plan i�mendment $1,272.00
Initial Studv_ 87.00
Zone Change 649.00
plus 5.44 x 32.00 174.G8
Initial Study 87.00
Total: $2,269.08
Also enclosed is one radius map, per your requirements prepa_ed
by First American Tit.e '.-:ith six sets of typed, gummed labels
lJ
11
. Jack Lan
ly 11, 1983
ge Two
n
u
sting the names, addresses and assessor's parcel of all property
owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject
property.
If there are any questions or any further information that you
need for this application., please do not hesitate to call rry
office.
Sincerely yours,
DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENT CUMPANY FOR
SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS
Jack Tarr
JT :sc General Partner
Fncls.
General Plan
�T%%G.w
o Proposed development shall conform
to the
building intensity (density range)
shown
on the Land Use Piar. Figure fil -l.
The
overall base density of the proposed
devel-
opment shall not exceed the maximum
dens-
ity permitted for the site nor be less
than
the minimum density permitted. The
dens-
ity indicated excludes rights -of -way
neces-
sary for secondary or major arterials.
Commercial Four rmmercial land uses shall be estab-
lished to meet the City's need for retail
establishments and assorted personal ser-
vices. uesignated on the Land Use Plan are
neighborhood commercial, general commercial,
community commercial, regional commercial,
and offices.
Neighborhood Commercial. Neighborhood
Commercial includes shopping centers and
convenience commercial clusters that provide
essential retail goods and services to the
residents or occupants in the immediate vicirn-
ity.
Neighborhood Shopp'ng Centers. These
centers shall be nrotiided to meet the retail
and service needs of a cluster of neighbor-
hoods with a total population of roughly
10,000 residents. The primar i use within
the neighborhood shopping c�;^t_r should be
a major supermarket and tots! lea-able area
raneing from 30,000 to 100,000 _quare feet.
The following provisions shall guide the de-
velopment of such centers.
o The centers shall be approximately 5 -15
acres in siz:.
o No more than 2 centers snal! be developed
at each designated intersection.
o The centers shall permit the following ten-
ants: eating and drinking establishments;
food and beverage retail sales; general
personal services, repair services for com-
mono!z-.ce household appliances; and retail
sales. Administrative and professional
offices, - redical services, and financial,
insurance and real estate services may be
permitted.
92
E-1-
r C
CI-1Y OF RANCHO CUinhiONGA
INITIkTL STUDY `� +
p_,RT i - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Enviror=t -ntal assessment Review Fee: $87.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
fo= :..ust ':e ccmpleted and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through Lhe department where the
project application LL made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Envirunmental Analysis staff will prep -
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
�-X'V -ittee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee :gill make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi-
ficant envi.ronmenr-al impact ant. a Negative De::laration
will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant
en, 'riron^tental impact and an Environmental impact Report
will be -Drepared, or 3) An additional information report
should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa-
tion concerning the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: SycxWre P3.aza
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDF,ESS, TELEPHONE: Syramcre L"l,7PSt.tents,
270 So. Bristol St -'eer- Site 201 Cosies Mesa, California 92626
7147957 -2651 —
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Jack Tarr, 270 So._F3ristol Street
Suite
LOCATION O? PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PAROLL NO.)
9738 Baseline PDad, Parcel 2, Parcel_Y'M L651 APN z02- 181 -27 —
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LC.CA1, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FLDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUC. PERMITS:
I -1
OF PROJECT: An arch-; to 111v intearat�
ciai develoranent �' nester —
s service and reta'i stores.
d financial uses_
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING 2UND
PROPOSED BL"iLDINGS, IF ANy:
5.44 acres: 511550 square feet
DESCRIBE THE ETVIROMMENTAL SETTING G° THE PROJECT ;ITE
INCLUDING !Nffi2•iATI- O— (C py TODOGRAPHY PZ NTS
AN1- "IALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OP. $ z"T^ (TREES) `
OF SURROUNDING PROPE T C"i _` -`1Sr EC7`S, USE
RTES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF tt -Y
EXISTINC STRUCTURES AND THEIR 17SE (ATTACK NECESSARY SHEETS)
Site �s rely flat with -,a
abardoi fruit tCP�S at c r xrr2cc
asow on site. There are c:�ltzial, sc�*Z�c or is i -
sanct� of °t.is site thatt vai . s= :�uicar:ly aff zsturica_
%;' a - ected --
`n ra_s ice sum
--- =-- - c]�et q:,�� _rs and cJma.-x? �u irrels _
- _
Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series
Of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may zs a whole have significant environmental impact?
No.
1-2
a
0
0
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
X 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
ISiCipai ser-.iccs (police, Sire, water,
Ima
sewage, etc.)?
X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan desig- ations?
X 5. Remove any existing trees? How .aany ?_
X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above: Zxist =ng abandoned
r:i` ard miscellaneous tree tyres Count is an aaomximation.
IMPGRTA, \T: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page,
CERTIFTCATIGN: I hereby certify that the statements
fu- -nished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial evaluation
to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements: and
information presented are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional
information may be required to be submitted before an adequate
evaluation can be made by the Development /Review C� ommitt s
Date —7 it Signature
i
n ny_
Title .._. �• is^-
1-3
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
The following information_ sr>_ould be provid:d to the City �
Planning Division ir. order to aid in ass l_tof Rancho lucamenga
district to acco.ranodate the proposed residentialndevelopment£ the school
Naive Of Developer and Tentative Tract No.-.
Specific Location of Project:
1.
P:IASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3
Number of single
family units:
2. Number of r:ultiple
family units:
3. Date proposed to
begin construction_:
+. Earliest date of
occupancy:
Model 9
and Y of Tentative
S.
Bedrooms Prime Range
I -4
PRASE 4
TOTAL
E
J
r- -I
L-A
E
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNINC COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DENYING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 83 -04 B - SYCAMORE, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN
FROM OFFICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ON 5.44 ACRES OF
LAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND BASE LINE
ROAD - APN 202 - 181 -27
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing to
consider said amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered ali public testimony
regarding the requested amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that th3 Planning Commission denies
General Plan Amendment 83 -04 B based on the following findings:
A. The requested amendment directly conflicts with the
City's General Plan policies regulating Neighborhood
Commercial Uses.
B. The applicant has presented insufficient information
with which to justify a change in the General Plan.
C. The amendment does not promote the goals of the Land
Use Element.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANING COMMISSION OF ln'E CITY OF
RANCHO CJCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 83 -04 B - SYCAMORE, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN
FROM OFFICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD COKMERCIAL ON 5.44 ACRES OF
LAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND BASE LINE
ROAD - APN 202 - 181 -27
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing to
consider said amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered ail public testimony
regarding the requested amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Com ission approves
General Plan Amendment 83 -04 B based on the following findings:
A. The requested amendment is in conformance with the
City's General Plan policies regulating Neighborhood
Cor.mercial Uses.
B. The amendment promotes the goals of the Land Use
Element.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983. 10
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopied by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ZONING CHANGE
83 -043 - SYCAMORE, A REQUEST FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM
A -P (ADMINISTRATIVE - PROFESSIONAL) TO C -1 (NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL) ON 5.44 ACRES OF LAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF ARCHIBALD ON BASE LINE ROAD - APN 202 - 181 -27
WHEREAS, the Plan -king Commission has held a public hearing to
consider said zone change; and
14HEREAS, the Planning Cortnissinn has considered all public testimony
regarding the requested zone change.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission denies
Zone Change 83 -04 B based on the following findings:
A. The requested zone change directly conflicts with the
City's General Plan policies regulating Neighborhood
Co,,rnercial Uses.
B. The applicant has presented insufficient informgition
with which to justify a change in the zone.
® C. The zone change does not promote the goals of the
Land Use Element.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST: _
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commssion of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
Citv of Rancho Cucamonga, at ? regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
Is NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
0
E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
8, 1983
T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Rick Marks, Associate Plannes-
:a —,
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -04
- ACACIA - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use
Plan from Office to Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac)
on approximately 3.58 acres of land located on the west
side of Archibald Avenue, north of Base Line Road - APN
202 - 151 -33.
1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Change General Plan Land Use Map for the
subject site from office to Medium -Nish Residential (14 -24
du /ac)
B. Purpose: o Weak demand for office use
o Strong demand for low cost noosing
o Proximity to shopping
o Caimark project approval
C. Location: (See Exhibit °A`)
D. Parcel Size: 3.58 acres
E. Existing Zoning: C -1 (Neighborhood Commercial)
F. Existing Land Use: Vacant, Undeveloped
G. Surrounding Land Use and Zon'
North - Vacant; R -i - Medium -High (14 -24 du /ac)
South - Shopping; C -1 - Neighborhood Commercial
East - Vacant; R -3 /PD - Medium High (14 -24 du /ac)
West - Vacant; R -3 /SO - Medium High (14 -24 du /ac)
F. Site Characteristics: Generally flat. no structures, low
growing weeds and grasses.
ITEM J
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CuA"i; 5IN OF THE CIT OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING CHANGE
83 -0413 - SYCAMORE, A REQUEST FOR TOH CN 1 (NEIGHBORHOOD
A_p (ADMINISTRATIVE - PROFESSIONAL)
COMMERCIAL'} ON 5.44 ACRES OF LANi�A N p
NORTHEAST CORNER
OF PRCHIBALO ON BASE LINE ROAD
WHEREAS,
the Planning Commission has held a public hearing to
ror,sider said zone change; and u.,lic testimony
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all
P
regarding the requested zone change. roves
;gyp :w, TH"cREFORE, BE IT RES^LVED, that the Planning Commission approves
Zone Change 83 -04 B ORE,d En the foilowing findings:
A. The requested zone change is in conformance Neighborheod
City's General Plan policies regulating
commercial Uses.
S. The zone change promotes the goals of the Land Use
Element. 1983.
A ?PROVED AND ADOPTED T;iIS 28TH DRY 6F SEPTr.MBER,
i'L ANNING COMMISSION Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCR1,014GA
BY:
5 L. .Jw....,
airman
ATTEST--
Secretary of the Plann ing Co rniss'on
of the Plannin5 Commission of the City of Rancho
Secretary certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
I, JACK LAM, the Planning Commission of the
Cucamonga, do hereby .ed by - Commission held
regularly ,ntrod;:ced, passed, and adop
a at a regular eeting Of votentonwit:
City of Rancho Co asenp9 ,
on the 28th day `ember, 1983, by
AYES: COMVISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT' COM
MISSIGNERS:
PLANNING COMMI5oIUN STAFF REPORT
GPA 83 -04 C - Acacia
September 28, 1983
Page 2
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The analysis of a proposed amendment to the Land Use
Plan of the General Plan should focus primarily on surrounding
and use compatibility, land use goals and policies as
expressed in the Plan, and potential environmental impacts.
B. Reasons for Requested Change Category_ The rationale for the
requesteC change in land use from Office to Medium -High
Residential is offered in a letter to the City by Alan C.
Weirick of Weirick Properties, Limited (attachment "B ").
Ba-ically the reasons offered are as follows:
a. Weak demand for office space at this location.
b. Strong demand for low cost housing citywide.
c. Proximity to the proposed Calmark Senior Citizen
Housing project.
d. Proximity to shopping.
As shown on the attached site map, the property is 3.58 acres
surrounded on three sides by vacant land; on the south side of
the property a Neighborhood Commercial Center.
C. General Plan Land Use Goals and Policies: The General Plan
describes the Medium-High Residential ensity category as
"approiriate in proximity to major community facilities and
employ.ient opportunities and aiong major thoroughfares ". The
subject property would appear to meet this basic locational
crite,•ia for designation as Medium -High residential. The
requested land use change is also compatible with the
designation given the Calmark 'Heritage Park Senior Citizens
hous-:.7 project just east of the subject prcperty and
residential development can be serviced by the shopping centers
south of the site.
D. Issues for Consideration:
o What is the best long-term use of the site (in t "I s'eort
term, the demand for office space may be low but will there
be a need for office space in the City in the long term and
is this a desirable location for it)?
• Will the proposed land use create a problem for the Calmark
Senior Citizen Housing project?
• Is the fact that the site has not developed a result of the
recent recession in the overall ecni:omy of the nation or the
result of an inappropriate General Plan designation?
v
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 33 -04 C - Aeacia
September 23, 1933
Page 3
E. Impacts of the Proposed Ge
the planning area of the
serious or adverse to the
are as follows:
1 Plan. Amendment: The impacts on
oposed change are generally not
y. The two most serious impacts
iiTipaCt Gr+ 1, alu+ +d °k $0n: ^vr {,it'.zen Project - when the Planning
Commission �ana City Counci 1-Tp-p—roved the Calmark project and
the Senior Housing overlay District, it was with the idea that
the location of the project was well suited to a senior citizen
project because of the site's proximity to services - including
the future officelco,rmnercial services that could be offered
from the subject site. It was hoped that at l -east some of the
Gffices and services At the subject site would be geared toward
partially serving senior citizens.
The other concern discussed during the discussion on the
Calmark project was the impact of the market rate,
family- oriented rental units (also proposed by Calmark) on the
senior citizen units. The requested General Plan change will
lead to the placement of
senior citizen units,
safety and well being
Calmark project. Th
traffic, crime, childre n
riding bicycles on the
conflicts in overall lif
approximately 75 units adjacent to the
again raising the concern about the
of the senior citizens occupying the
The
specific concerns included noise,
from nearby housing units playing or
senior citizen project grounds, and
e style of the occupants.
It is not expected that the proposed change in land use will
have any negative impacts on the other land uses in the
surrounding area.
Im acts on the General ?Ian and Plannin Process- The main.
reason o fere by the app leant or the Genera Plan change is
"a weak demand for office space at this location ". Staff met
with the applicant and asked for some empirical evidence (i.e.
market survey) that in fact the site is unsuitable for office
uses either because of location or site features; to date the
applicant_ has not offered any such evidence.
A City General Plan must look at the long -range needs of the
City and determine the best use of land over a long period of
time. It may in fact be true that the subject site has not as
yet been marketable as an office use, but the history of city
development suggests that one of the last kinds of uses to be
developed in a young growing city is that of offices. A city
will first develop residential areas that are supported by
neighborhood shopping facilities and only after a minimum
population level is reached do office uses tend to develop.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 83 -04 C - Acacia
September 28, 1583
Page 4
E
A request for a significant change in a City General Plan
carries with it the burden of proving that in fact a change is
necessary and in the interest of the City as we'.1 as the
applicant. An unsubstantiated claim that a site is incapable
of being developed according to its General Plan designation
provides no solid information for the City to make a decision
upon and sets a precedent of changing the Plan at any time for
any reason, a precedent dangerous to the City's overall
planning efforts. Even upon presenation of data by an
applicent that a property is suitable for another General Plan
Land Use designation, a city may re;tct such a request if it
feels it has a good reason to do so; however, without data, it
is very difficult to seriously consider such a change. The
City developed its General Pian through a careful and
deliberate process, the basis of which was analysis of the best
planning information then available. The City should change
the Plan only by following the same planning standards.
F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been
completed by the applicant. Staff has completed the
environmental checklist (Part 11 of the Initial Study) and
found no significant adverse adverse environmental impacts attributable
to tare proposed'amendment. .Wi.ile no significant environmental
impacts are expected, the propcsed land use change would have
the following impacts:
• The requested amendment would locate housing on a site that
the General Plan currently reserves for office uses, thereby
altering the location of the population and the overall
density of housing in the general area.
• The requestea amendment would result in a substantial
alteration of the present planned land use of the area
ch= .aging it from office and low intensity commercial uses to
residential uses in the Medium High (14 du /ac) density
range.
o A change in land use designation from Office to Medium High
Residential will increase service demands on police,
schools, parks, recreational facilities, and libraries
beyond levels required by office- related land uses. The
change in service level demands should not be significantly
greater than those required by office for poiice services;
other service demands will be more substantially felt by
service providers, although new systems or alterations to
existing systems will not be required.
If the Commission chooses to recommend approval of this
amendment, it is recommended that issuance of a Negative
Declaration be reconmended to the City Council.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 83 -04 C - Acacia
September 28, 1403
Page 5
III_ FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Following are the findings required to be made
or approval of this amendment.
A. The amendment does not conflict with the land use policies of
the General Plan.
B. The amendment promotes the goals of the Land Use Element.
C. The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental
to adjacent properties.
The Commission . must . exaMine and decide whhether. the,, z endaenL;:from
Office to F4ed #vm i{fgb t3es;tiefltiai ' would promote > he`Tarid Rsse `g4a;s
and purposes of *he Genera ,Pfian''and whither this amendment tmroo7d'
materially;,4etrimental to. adjacent pre ertae$ `aq' cause s7oi'ficant
adverse enir'iromftn't .I :1moacts as `11si: "in `C "'` above.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: ?k s item has been advertised as a public hearing
in The Dal Re ort newspaper and notices were Sant to property
owners within eet of the subject property.
V. RECONNENDATTON: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
deny this r, st for a change in the Land Use Plan of the General
Plan on the grounds that the applicant has presented insufficient
information with which to justify a change from Office to
Medium -High Residential. The Commission should conduct a public
hearing and receive all public input on this matter. If the
Commission finds that the requested amendment is consistent with
General Plan goals and policies, a reco=endation of approval
should be forwarded to the City Council.
Resplfhylly ydbmitted,
Ri
anner
:RM:jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Letter from Applicant Requesting Amendment
Initial Study
Resolution - Denial
Resolution - Approving
E
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 83 -04 C - Acacia
September 2F, 1983
Page 5
it
III. FACTS FOR FINCINGS: Followinc c findings required to be spade
for approval of this amendment.
A. The amendment does not conflict with the land use policies of
the General Plan.
E. The amendment promotes the goals of the Lard Use Element.
C. The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental
to adjacent properties.
This amendment would not be materially detrimental to adjacent
properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts as
listed in "C" above. The Commission must examine and decide
whether the a,,iendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial would
promote the land use goals and purposes of the General Plan.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This iten has been advertised as a public hearing
in The Dail yReport newspaper and notices were sent to property
owners �ait'Fi'l 0 feet of the subject property.
V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
deny this request for a change in the Land Use Plan of the General
Plan on the grounds that the applicant has presented insufficient
information with which to justify a change from Office to
Medium -High Residential. The Commi --lion should conduct a public
hearing and receive all public input on t "is matter, If the
Commission finds that the requested amendment is consistent with
General Plan goals and policies, a reco=, endation of approval
should be forwarded to the City Council.
ectful W`$ubmitted,
Ric1' GAi42X''
City Planner
RG:RM :jr
Attachments: E :chibit "A" - Location Map
Letter from Applicant Requesting Amendment
Initial Study
Resolution - Denial
Resolution - Approving
11
attachment "a"
J
I
• - ��� 35 I
POr ` i
2�K
1
i
M b
1 Per I CG
/ 06
4
Pc• z 20 -151 Qo� / p 1202-181
PROJECT
P °. 1 Ism
SITE J /
Lu
34
dD
•: f. rc b u3[SSGO Ow�Mq[ I i d
f
U O .VI
161 �O 2 22 -161 Pm
� 40 41
"•_� aa- 2 �tj'
S. as d c
I27
STO42 I s,:s
�r 200
0
attachment
ALAN C. WEMCIK, N1.AI.
MENDER REAL ESTATE APPRAISER ANC CONSULTANT IIII�� ' I O FICC TLLEPN O1
`n'� �A V (� LI 'VZIC 1 � 9G3i41
AMERICAN IRSTITUT[ OF 2000 E. COLORADO BLVD.. SUITE 960 �. �II ' OF f \/ f
REAL EST /.TE APPRAISCRS PASAOENA. CALIFORNIA Bt1O7 J` '' V ^CUI„tiT� . nIV ry
r bEVE! OPMENT pcP'
-
AUG 10 1983
August 9, 1983 AM
7'A9!)0 "U?'1l2i314151
Plannino Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga g
P. O. Box 607
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Attention: Dan Coleman, Planner
Re: General Plan Amendment for
3.58 Acres on the wesr side of
Archibald Avenue commencing
412 feet North of Baseline Roa <:
Parcel l of Parcel map 5792
Assessor's Parcel 202 = 151 -33
GenLlemen:
Prior to July 15th, 1983, an application was filed for a General
Plan Amendment on this property, requesting a change from office to
medium /high residential use (15 to 24 dwelling units per acre)_ This
application was filed by Acacia Construction, Inc., Henry A. Fredricks
and Rick Snyder, acting as our agents. The purpose of this letter is
to present our reasons for the requested amendment. These are as
follows:
1. A low demand for office use exists at this location. After an
intensive marketing effort for over two years, no user was found
for this same use on the property across Archibaldt at the north-
west corner of Baseline and Archibald.
2. A strong demand exists for low cost residential housing in the
city.
3. The parcel adjacent on the west with inferior access will be
developed by Calmark at this residential density.
4. The property is at a good location for mediur.I /high residential use
adjacent to a neighborhood shopping certtr. At this vocation,
less auto transportation and parking would be needed.
Our prior regL--st dated November 17, 1980 for a neighborhood commercia..
use designation was denied. We ask for your consideration in this
request.
Yours sincerely,
Alan C. Weirick, General Partner
Weirick Properties, Limited
cc: Acacia Construction, Inc.
270 Laguna Road, Suite 100,
Fullerton, California 92635
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGIi
INITIAL STUDY
CTA-$ _`i- a +C,
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00
For all projects requiring environ.-nental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff gill prepare
Part 11 of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Commi-ttee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will na -e no signi-
ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration
will be filed, 2) The pr_.^ ^.t will have a significant
environmental impact and an En-.,ironmental Impact Report
will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report
should be supplied by the appli,:art giving further informa-
tion concerning the proposed prk:iect.
PROJECT TITLE: Casa Lomita ( Tentative )
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Acacia Construction, Inc.
273 Laguna Road, Fullerton, California 92535 714 992 -0880
NP.MX , ADDRESS, TELEPHONE
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT:
270 Laguna Road, Fullerton,
OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
Rick Snyder, Acacia Construction. Inc.
California 92635 714 992 -CS80
John D_ Rose & Associates,770 S. Brea Blvd_ Suite 230, Brea, California 92521
714- 529 -9340
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
S_Y_ Corner of Archibald and .om_ta ('011'1-
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL,
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING
Building Permits, etc.
REGIONAL, STATE AND
SUCH PERMITS:
i -1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PRO„'ECT: Construction of 80 Unit Condorini= Proiect
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA A1ND.SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ,.,..v_ _ c8 Acres
✓ V 1 I.J 1Y V L nLY 1.
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON ^_'JPOGRAPHY, PLAN-I'S (TREES) ,
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORT_CAI., OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
I-2
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
�- 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
_ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, Fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
5. Remove any existing trees? How many?
_ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flaimnables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above: Present Zoning C -1
General Plan Amendment
Planned Development of Medium Nigh Density
IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby cer•:ify that the statements
furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information requir =d for this initial evaluation
to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are -,-rue and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief. I f,-rther understand that additional
infornation nay be required to be submitted before an adequate
evaluation can be .lade by the Development Review Committee.
Date July 15, 1983 Signature M -
Title _... i
1-3
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Plannino Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school
district to accommodate the proposed residential dpvelopment.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Acacia Construction. Inc.
Specific Location of Project: S.W. Corner of Archibald & Lomita Court
1. Number of sinale
family units:
2. Number of multiple
family units:
3. Date proposed to
begin construction
. Earliest date of
occuparz; :
Model
and # of Tentative
5. Bedrooms Price Range
+
l 70,000
2 - 83,000
LI
PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL
N/A
80
1/84±
S,f 84=
I -4
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 83 -04C - ACACIA, TO AMEND THE WEST SIDE OF
ARCHIBALD AVENUE, NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD - APN 202 -151-
-33 FROM OFFICE TO MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL (4 -14 DU/AC)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing to
consider General Plan Amendment 83 -04C; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has heard and considered all public
testimony regarding the amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission approves
General Plan Amendment 83 -04C based on the following findings:
A. The amendment conforms with the residential land use
policies of the General Plan.
B. The amendment promotes the goals of the Land Use
Element.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Panning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Coimission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of September, 1983, by the follcwing vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
a
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
Ll
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DENYING GENERAL PLAN
AME"NEMENT 83 -04C - ACACIA, TO AMEND THE WEST SIDE OF
ARCHIBALD AVENUE, NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD - APN 202 -151-
33 FROM OFFICE TO MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL (4 -14 DU /AC)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing to
consider General Plan Amendment 83 -04C; and
'WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has heard and considered all public
testimony regarding the amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission denies
General Plan Amendment 83 -04C based on the following findings:
A. Insufficient information- supporting the need to
change the General Plan from Office to Medium; -High
Residential has been offered by the applicant.
B. The amendment does not conform with the residential
land use policies of the General Plan.
C. The amendment does not promote the goals of the Land
Use Element.
APPRCVEC AND A3OPTED THIS 28Th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983.
PLANNING CO"uMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, C airman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Corrnission of the'
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
ROES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
u
E
TO:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
8, 1983
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL U�it NtKmil ut -vc -
ANDERSON - The deve opnent of a retail center on -.5 acres
o an in the C -1 zone to be located at the northwest
corner of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue - APN 208- 321 -32.
BACKGROUND: On August 24, 1983 the 'Planning Commission directed tree
applicant to work with staff to resolve landscape requirements along
Arrow and Turner. Staff has met with the applicant to revise the site
plan to include additional landscape planter islands along the street
frorzages. The current expiration date is September 29, 1983.
ANA:vSIS: Our current standards require 45 feet of landscaping on Arrow
a5 'meet or Turner, as measured from the face of curb. These
standards were developed to provide a consistent and aesthetically
pleasing streetscape for the City. The landscape setback is intended to
provide for a combination of trees, shrubs and mounding, sufficient to
screen parking areas. To strictly comply with these standards, the
entire site plan would require substantial revisions which would result
in practical hardship since the site is limited in size and shape.
However, the applicant proposes to eliminate some of the parking stalls
along Arrow and Turner and install additional landscape planters as
shown on Exhibit W. Further, the landscaped area will be bermed
approximately 2 -3 feet in height to provide maximum screening of the
parking area, as shown in Exhibit "8 ".
If the Commission determines that the proposed revisions satisfy the
intent of the streetscape requirements, the time extension could be
granted. Should the Commission determine that the revisions do not
comply with City standards, then the CUP should not be extended, which
would require submittal of a new pro .ject. If the Commission chores to
approve the applicant's request, they can grant any increment of
extension up to seventeen (17) months.
ITEM K
PLANNING COMMISSION
CUP 81 -02 /Anderson
September 28, 1983
Page 2
El
STAFF REPORT
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended
all materia and input regarding
is provided should the Commission
M
11
11
anner
tted,
that the Planning Commission consider
this item. " Resolution of Approval
decide to gran the extension.
Exhibit "A" - Revised Site Plan
Exhibit °S° - Cross Section
August 24, 1983 Staff Report
Resolution
E
Ilk A
L r. tf
..
Pa
S sr 5% U t
Dqq-'3 Yg r Q9 y,a, 1L1
TT
'CJ �' }+�fta� �G•3 � 3< ��� 53 �a� ��f F" 2,� ` /�� � iil 6d
U
y
I � l i d I I —• c_ � � 7G
t
1
rr Uu...l, G
1
- I
� ul
ja}uao f ulddoys
Ilk A
L r. tf
..
Pa
S sr 5% U t
Dqq-'3 Yg r Q9 y,a, 1L1
TT
'CJ �' }+�fta� �G•3 � 3< ��� 53 �a� ��f F" 2,� ` /�� � iil 6d
U
y
I � l i d I I —• c_ � � 7G
t
1
rr Uu...l, G
1
- I
� ul
C ]
I:
E
CITY Or RANCHO CUSMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 24, 1983
T0: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez. City Planner
BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:
ofV� and in the C -1 zone to be located
corner of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue -
t
NtMil 01 -UL -
iter on 1.5 acres
at the northwest
APN 208- 321 -32.
BACKGROUND: The developer is requesting a time extension for CUP 81 -02,
located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue
(Exhibit °A "). The project consists of an 18,000 square foot commercial
building to include a 100 seat restaurant and self - service car wash. In
addition, a 3,000 square foot building pad will be constructed for
future development.
The project was originally approved for 18- months on February 25, 1981
and subsequently granted a 12 -month extension. The current expiration
date is August 25, 1983. The developer is requesting a time extensiol
due to the current economic climate that exists at this time and the
feasibility of leasing the subject buildings after construction.
ANALYSIS: Two items of concern relative to this time extension are: (1)
conformance with current development standards; and, (2) appropriate
length of the time extension. A review of the site plan revealed that
the project does not conform to the landscape requirement for Arrow
Route or Turner Avenue. Based upon our current standards, Arrow Route,
as a Special Boulevard, requires an average 45 -foot deep streetscape.
The approved plan provides 25 feet. Turner Avenue is designated as a
secondary street with a 35 -foot streetscape requirement. The approved
plan provides 20 feet. To comply with the streetscape requirements, the
site plan would have to be revised substantially. Such a change would
require review by the Design Review and Development Review Committees
and approval by the Planning Commission. If the Commission determines
that compliance with the streetscape standards is necessary, then this
CUP should not be extended. Such action would deem the approved project
invalid and the applicant would have to process a new site plan.
Regarding the length of the time extension, the informal policy is to
allow a four year approval, with the appropriate extensions. If the
Commission choses to approve the applicant's request, they can grant any
increment of extension up to eighteen (18) months. If the full eighteen
I TEM. D
r
L J
L11
E
Time Extension
Planning COmmissl ..
f,ugust 24, 19x3
Page 2
81-02/Anderson
Agenda
months is granted, this would be the last extension that co =.:ld be
granted. If a shorter extension is grantea, the Commission cculd
indicate that this would be the last extension because of the landscape
non - conformities.
REC01;11tATION It is recommended that. the Planning Commission consider
Sin9i +t an material relative to this project. A Resolution of
approval is provided should the commission decide to grant the
extension.
Respectfully submjtted,
Rick Gomez
City Planner
R6:CJ:jr
!Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Illustrative Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Elevations
Exhibit "E" - Elevations
Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit "G" - Letter from Developer
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
Time Extension Resolution of Approval
U
R i-kNI Ci to CUCNN'IU,NUA TrrLE: lfsl
PLANNING D1V qON EXHIBIT - SCALE: --f
'V�ro1. Vii_ 1_I ..
t
Y
Is
IP
Ll
Ll
Js
t
�1
a.E y
�)
�; w
r``�t 111!0 �J• 74t'faj[h�. ' .'�t �- r '
:L� ,`S ^"°i91'Je?ZG..7•' _. v.' ^�.':1 �ikilF•,�,� �- i . _
{
•. a «• �-
.r
•
•
�s
R
• ....� 1 .
-.t�' � � .. ._. - i �.- .. Ate( f 1 If f� "_� f_.. �'.
11
u
*g H SL.FyA -Tj at4
CITY OF
RA \CH® CUC4'N10 \-GA
PLAINNII G DIRISM
EY+�• gx.Na W `�a.� urp
ITE.NI= cuf
TITLE=
EXHIi3IT= SCALE- �••••
i/ V
NORM
0
E
E
r
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCk`'10 \GA
PLANNING DI'%rMN
w
Trr� ::,CNG£QTl3r' �
PIS
EXH113rr --�_ SCALE-
E
ARNOLD D. ANDERSONIREALTOR
520 NORTH EUCLID AVENUE • ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91762 • (714) B,".6 -6795 f gPC E
�l CIJOA ZONC
u u U i 1983
At$ ""'
August 1, 1983
Mr ^.an Coleman
Planning Department
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
RE: RCR Plaza - Arrow & Turner
Dear Mr. Coleman;
This letter is to request an extension of C.U.P. 81 -02
for a period of one year to eighteen months.
This pro-ject is being held up due to the economic climate
that exists at this time, and the feasibility of being able to
lease the pr, erties we propose to build.
We respectfully request this extension and thank you for
your help. Enclosed please find my check in the amount of $62.00.
ADA /ds
encl
cc: Richard Avent
Yours' truly,
G-. .)..Fes. { >1 -aZ
Yid lf?r T 11 e:/ .fl
L J
11
RESOLUTION N0. 81 -21
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA: PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 81 -02 FOR A RETAIL CENTER
LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW AND
TURNER IN THE C -1 ZONE.
WHEREAS, on the 9th day of January, 1931, a complete application
was filed for review on the above described property: and
i4HERFAS, on the 25th day of February, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning COMission held a public hearing to consider the above - described
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
ission
resolved as follows:
.SECTION ION 1:. That the following findings have been made:
1. That the site for d the proposed development is consistent
with the propose
2. That the property and the permitted use thereof.
effect on use will not have an
thereofabutting property
3. That this devvelopment welfare ill not be injurious sto the health,
safety, and
SECTION 2• That this project will not create adverse
impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on
February 25, 1581.
SECTION 3• That Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -02 is approved
subject to the following conditions:
Pian�ing Division
1. Detailed drawings for the drive -thru restaurant, including
elevations, colored elevations, and building mateial by
samples, shall be submitted, and reviewed and approved
the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of
building permits.
2. The restaurant pad shall be turfed and irrigated until
such time as pad is developed.
3. Dense landscaping, including trees and shrubs, shall be
provided as a buffer along the north and west property
planter o size shall fbe 5' o f e the north Planner.
and planter.
A minimum of 24 feet of free and clear access „a:st be
provided around the rear portions of the retail building
(car wash facilities are permitted within this aisle).
The bicycle rack in front of the retail building shall be
relocated so as not to obstruct pedestrian and handicap
access to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Pedestrian wal!ways shall be provided from the sidewalks
on Arrow and Turner and on -site walkways or stamped
concrete pathways shall be provided across paved surfaces
to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
All service parking s ±alas indicated on the deZ iled site
plan shall be a minimun of 10 feet in width and striped
as "loading Zone Only ".
The car wash area, including the drying spaces and the
space between, shall be P.C.C. instead of asphalt paving.
All surface rvnerf from the car wash shall be collected
into catch basins and severed to the satisfaction of
Cucamonga County dater District reSuircnnents. The grading
and drainage plan. shall be revised tr, indicate this.
The T & O wood fascia shall be continued around rear
portion of retail huildina to enhance the north and west
elevations.
The City Planner s;rall review the riccsa of operation
of the Center one ;;year from the date of occupancy to
determine whether there have been complaints to warrant
Planning Con--5 ssion review and establishment of hours
of operation.
APPROVED AND ADDPTrD THIS 25TH DA`;
C ^v,.MISSION 0= THE CITY OF RANCriO CLCAMONGA
Richard Dahl, Cha mean
Resolution No- 81r=,� T
Page 3 T\
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 25th day of February, 1981 by the following vote
to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Rempel, King, Tolctoy, Dahl
NOES: CO"?dISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
E
11
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE`IELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
Subject:
Appiicanl
Location
Those items checked are conditions of approval.
APptICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOP. COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
-CONDITIONS:
A. Site Development
�i. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file
in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein.
2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of
approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of
building permits.
�3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of
the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at
time of Building Permit issuance.
4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation
Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards.
S. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and
located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division.
6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot :sigh masonry wall with
view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be
subject to approval by the Planning Division.
7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill
Fire Districts as "hazardous", the roof materials must be approved by the
Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit.
S. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division
for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, Shall -;-be architecturally
integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties
anc streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions.
210. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced
thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to
the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development.
T
21. A detailed lighting plan shall be sutmitted to and approved by the
Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan
i
shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of
shielding. No lighting shall adverse]y affect adjacent properties.
_ 12. 111 swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall
be solar heated.
13 Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open
spaces and recreational uses.
14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticais
kept out of public view from private and public streets.
C
11
15. Standard patio cover plans Fall be submitted to and approved by the
City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first
unit.
16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a
clear and concise manner, including proper illumination.
17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be
installed on each unit in this project.
18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit.
19. All snits within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted
for a solar water heating unit.
20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be
-- incorporated into tris project to include such things as but not limited
to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double
paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc.
21. This development shall provide a option to home buyers to purchase a
solar water heating unit.
22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the
satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District.
23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout
the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma.
A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes,
physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City
equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final mar.
24. This tract_ shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance
of equestrian trails.
L
AT
25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or
rents, in conformance -with General Plan housing policies and the housing
criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall
be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels
at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision
shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building
permits and occupancy of the units.
B_ Parking and Vehicular Access
1. All parking loc landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside aimension
of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall.
2. Parkina lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size.
Z3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide.
rO� 4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum
of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with
Foothill Fire District requirements.
Z5. All parking spaces shall be double striped_
_ 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers.
i. Desicnated visitor parking ar =as shall be turf blocked.
8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on
this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the
owner.
9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other
than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C_ & R.'s shall be developed
by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to
issuance of building permits.
C. LandscaDina
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of
existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be
completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the
proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior to approvai of the final grading plan.
9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall
be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans.
10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and
sidewalks shall be ircluded in the required landscape plans and shall
be subject to approval by the Planning Division.
�11. A minimum of'''e`''' C12.) specimen size trees shalt be planted
Within the project.
12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman
size trees, anj a�bundance.Lf landscaping is required along
�QAI d WMe/(
LI
3.
Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be
_
trimmed and topped at: 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees
shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division
during the review of the Master Plan pf Existing On -Site Trees. Those
trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a
tree- for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division_
%
w/ 4.
Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in
accordance with :he Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior
strCats and 20' on exterior streets.
5_
A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes,
_
shall be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70%-15
—
gallon, and lON -5 gall, .)n.
6.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition,
free fro-m weeds, trash, and debris.
7.
All slope banks in access -)f five (5) feet in vertical height shall and
are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with
slope planting requirements of the Cit; of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope
planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and
appropriate shrubs and trees. Ail such planting and irrigation shall
be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the
developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer.
Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes
shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in
satisfactory condition.. Iii the case of custum lot subdivisions, all
completion of grading
such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon
®
or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building
Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to
germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination.
8.
All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained
by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such
proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance
of building permits.
9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall
be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans.
10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and
sidewalks shall be ircluded in the required landscape plans and shall
be subject to approval by the Planning Division.
�11. A minimum of'''e`''' C12.) specimen size trees shalt be planted
Within the project.
12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman
size trees, anj a�bundance.Lf landscaping is required along
�QAI d WMe/(
LI
e.
M
E.
SiGns
Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance
with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinancp, and shall require review and approval
by tFe Planning Divi_ian prior to installation of such signs_
2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the
Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of
Building permits.
3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this
approval and will require separate sign review and approval.
!1-
Additional Aoorovals Reeuired
Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building
Permit.
Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final
subdivision map.
3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval
of gene Change and /or Variance /Conditional Use Permit
4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at
which time the Planning Co;missiOn may add or delete cons tiiors or r- `,.e
the Conditional Use Permit.
5. The developer is requi,:d to obtain the following signed statement by
purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on
or adjacent to their property.
I.
2.
In purchasing the home located or Lot Tract
on I,have read the C.C. & R.'s and
understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re-
ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian
traffic to gain access.
Signed
Purchaser
Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to
occupancy.
6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of
building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification
from all affected School. Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of
Co^runity Cevelopment which states that adequate school facilities are or
will be capable of accormodating students generated by this project. Such
letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within
sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision
mac or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
11
r_
7.
9
Prior to appro and recordation of the final n p, or prior to the issuance
of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the
affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or
will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the
Depart,;,ent of Comms:nity-Development. Such letter must have beenissued1by
the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map app.N.
the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable
by the Santa Ana Regional Water Contrul Board and the City, written certi-
fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be
obtained and submitted to the City.
This approval shall become nuil and void if the tentative subdivision zap
is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is
involved, within twelvE: (12) months from tthePapproval Coof this project
unless an extension has been granted ,y _
This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is
required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section
of the Growth Management Ordinance prior otobefinal approval tand recordation
of the map if the subdivision is going
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
Site Development ant 1 ThefapplicchanicaTlCodeplUnWformtPlumbina +Codep'National Electric Code, and
all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the tiall of approval
of this project.
/2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence
shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply
for fire protection is available.
3_ Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling
xisting unit(s;> the applicant shall pay
unit(s) or major addition to an e
development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not
be limited to: City Beautification. Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee.
4. Prior to the issuance of a balding permit for a new commercial or industrial
development or addition to an existing develcpment, the applicant shall pay
development fees at the established rate. Such fees may
be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan
Checking Fees.
/;5_ This approval shall become null and void if building permits are nct issued
5- for this project within one year from the date of project approval-
J, 6. Street names and addresses shall be proviced by the building official.
l�J
1
i. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material
and non- cocrbustibl e roof material.
8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the
street upgrade with additional Brood trim around windows and wood siding
or pian• -ons where appropriate.
r,, Existing Structures
1. Frovice compliance with the Uniforn Building Code for property line clearances
considering use, area and fire- resistiveness of existing buildings-
- 2. Existing building(s) sijall be mzde to comply with current Building and
Zoning regula *_ions for the intended use or the - building shall Le demolished.
3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, 'illed andlor capped
— — to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code.
N. Grading
1.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform
Building Lode, City Crading Standards and accepted grading practices.
The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the
anoroved conceptual grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the
State of Lalifornia to perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified angineer ur geologist
and sub: fitted at the time of application for grading plan :Ihec!,-
_4 -. 3n= final grading plan shall be subject to revie.+ and approval by the
i-- panning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed permit recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of builoin
whichever comes first.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION i=OR COMPLIANCE 111TH T1-SE FOLLO:-IING
CONOiTIONS:
I. Dedications and Venicular access W=
I. Dedications shall be made by final map of aii interior street rights -of -way
and all necessary easements as S1%,m on the tentative map.
2_ Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the
follor.iriy streets:
addition, -1 feet on -------
additionaal feet on _-----
additional feet on
11
3.
Ll
Z 1k
_ 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards.
4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as
follows:
5- Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over
private roads, drives, or parking areas_
Z 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal
circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the
property or in the operation of the proposed business.
Street Improvements
_ I. Construct full street improvements including, but not li -mited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street
lights on all 4oterior streets.
0002. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to:
j CURS a
STREET NAME G ii R
A_C.
PVMT_ !
SIDE-
WALK
DRIVE
APPR.
STREET
LIGHTS
A -C.
OVERLAY
WHEEL
CHAIR. RAMPS
OTHER
p;
�iilAFa(
!
T—
! x
i X
!
�
y
3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment
permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in
additicn to any other permits required.
_ 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer R.nd prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements,
prior to issuance of do encroachment permit.
S. Surety shall be post ^d and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completjon of the public
improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building
permits, whichever comes first.
6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer, prior to occupan.y.-
7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed
per the requirements of the City Encineer.
1�
K. Drainaae and Flood Control
1. The applir_ant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage
facilities required by the City Engineer.
2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations:
_Z3. The proposed project falls within areas indici:ted as subject to flcoding
under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions
-of the program and City Ordinance No. 24.
_ 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect
the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street.
5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water cairying
streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, cornercial type
drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection v,alis, and /or
landscaped earth berms and rolled criveways at property line.
L. Utilities
All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground
includir,c utilities along major arterials less than 12 Kv.
2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving
utility companies and the City Engineer.
vow 3. Developer shall be. responsible for the relocation of existing public
utilities, as required_
4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in
accordance with Southern California Edison Corpany and City standards.
5. hater and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet
requirements of the Cucamonga County Hater District (CCWD), Foothill Fire
District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San
Bernardino. A letter of compiiance form CLAD will be required prior to
recordation.
5. Apprcvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested
agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any
requirements that may be received from them.
M_ General Recui -e :eats and Aoorovals
1. Permits from ether agencies will be require as follows:
A. Caitrans for:
B. County Dust Abatem ^nt (required prior to issuance of a grading Perri *_)
C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District
J. Other:
11
_ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and R,:strictions (CCaR's) and Articles
of Incorporation of the Homeowners Assou'atinn, subject to the approval of
the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to
the City. _
_ 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Inten *_ion to form Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs
involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer.
4. Final parcel and tract saps shall conform to City standards and procedures.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION,
APPROVING THE EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81 -02
WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the
above- described project, pursuant to Section 61.0219 (o)8B of the Zoning
Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the
above - described project.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following Mn g
A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a
distressed market climate for residential projects.
B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory
conditi ms make it unreasonablete record the Tracts
at this time.
C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval
regarding expirations would not be consistent with
® the intent of the Zoning Code.
D. That the granting of said time extensions will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,
or materially injurious to properties or improvements
in the vicinity.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a
time extension o :
Project App Iicant Expiration
CUP 81 -02 Anderson February 25, 1985
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
.Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST
® Secretary of the Planning Ccmm ss on
I, JACK LPM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: C014MISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
11
ACTIONS I. CALL TO ORDER
CM 0I:
RANTCHO (a:Q CXNGA
PL TTNIN:O CONEN/lISSION
ACTENDA
DEVELOPMENT CODE PUBLIC HEARING
OCTOBER 4, 1983
6:30 P.M.
LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENIER
9161. BASE LINE ROAD
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALTcORNIA
II. ROLL CALL
ommissi'oner Barker X Commissioner Rempel X
Commissioner Juarez XTeft at SCommissioner Stout X
7.
Commissioner McNiel X arrived a� .:33
Ill. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Approved September 6, _
5-0 -0 September 20, 1983
�► L"-- fc
IV. MEETING OBJECTIVE:
Review the Deve opment District Map for conformance with the General Plan
and complete a detailed review of the Residential Development Standards.
V. PUBLIC HEARi`C AND DEW1LED REVIEW OF CHAPTERS
A. Review of Map
B. Review of ResidentialDevelopment Standards
VI. ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set
an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be
heard 00y with the consent of the Commission.