Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984/05/23 - Agenda Packet .�1 L � ti• .P. Y o , .e Gi.C.�.tir�1 CrrY OF RANCHO CUCIAN ONG-. PLAINT\.LSTG GCC ' ! 7\ T>JSIC�T F� > AGENDA 1977 WEDNESDAY MAY 23, 1:84 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARE: COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A C T I tJ It L Pledge of Allegiance H. Roll Call Commissioner Barker X Commissioner Rempel X Commissioner Stout �— Commissioner McNiel X III. Announcements IV. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A?PROVED 4-0 with A. DESIGN REVfEW FOR TRACT 11734 - AMERICAN removal of item 3. NATIONAL - Reapplication for Design Review of modifications to the architectural product for 58 condominiums on 8.5 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow and Vineyard. 6. NO ACTION TAKEN BY B. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-20 - COMMISSION - CUP T KARMA - The development of a 3,691 square foot -XPIRE OF ORIGINAL elementary school and two temporary trailers on 3/4 acres r, E. located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard - APN 208-241-09. C. TIME EXTENSIONd FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11663 - MARLBOROUGH - A development of 383 townhouse units on 40 acres of land located on the east side of Archibald, south of Church Street - APN 1077-341-01, 1077-133-08, and 1077-631-03. D. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12171 - STEPHENSON - A custom lot subdivision of six lots on 3.3 acres of land in the Very Low (VL) District, located at the i northwest corner of Klusman Avenue and Whirlaway Street - APN 511-06-07. y' sae. (CONSENT CALENDAR E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT CONTINUED - APPROVED REVIEW 84-11 - MACBETi? - The development of an 80,332 4-0) square foot mini-storage facility on 3.56 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) located near the southwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 209-031-43. V. Public Hearings he following ite-ns are public hearings iz which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recogni'ed by the Chairman and address the Commission try stating your name and address. All such opinions shall ?,e limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. F. APPROVED 4-0 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN'P AND TENTATIVE TRACT Added conditions req. 12650 - DEER CREEK - A residential development of 225 minimum rear unit size of sin le familylots on 147.16 acres of land in the VeryLow 2500 sq. ft. , removal of Residential istrict located on the east side of Haven Avenue, one lot on each of 4 northern south o: the Hillside Flood Channel, and north of Hillside tiers, architectural compat. Road - APN 201-121-16. with existing tract, and notification to be sent to G. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF Deer Creek residents of P.C. RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND LEWIS HOMES - A public meeting for design review. hearing regarding certain aspects of development rights G. _APPROVED 4-0 pertaining to the Terra Vista Planned Community. VI. New Business H. DENIED 4-0 H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-09 - BATES ASHWELL/HAI%'KINS - The development of two office/industrial buildings totaling 29,184 square feet on 2.09 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 7th Street - APN 209-411-01. V IL Director's Reports I. APPROVED 4-0 1. BASE LINE MEDIAN DESIGN Vffi. Old Business J. APPROVED 4-C J. CARYN DEVELOPMENT (COUNTY PROJECT) - Staff will present a brief overview of the Caryr. Dilorio) residential development located within the City's sphere of influence north of Highland Avenue, south of Banyan, between Milliken and Rochester Avenues. The focus of the presentation will primarily relate to design ivies. `r. 4 F.. i DL Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. 1 i :25 p.m. X. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. 1f items go beyorA that time, they shall be heard oniy with the consent of the Commission. t° Adjourned to June 5, 1984 Special Meeting to discuss Tenta- tive Tract 12544 (Lyon). This meeting wili be held at the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, at 7:00 p.m. s rfA VICINITY MAP ri , e : r �i MFA �...<1W1ZY 4GIRYL IlM 1 • teeAcsEY .4 _ i i o k • Li vicea+. r. P .�/ 1s� r kloO Y�pR a� CITY'MALL • a • J A�e lJ • • • / 1 • _ NwMC. F.ow. • Is tl� • CUC.rMG.-f�G.STe CC'Jr+Y 9f GCMat •1Y. CNTAAIC MTE••A7L'1•AL .,Rpo*r yi.. _ TACK cArA o�1C OF PLA TNNUNG CONILN-TISSIO I AGENID:k SDAY MAY 23. 1984 7:00 P.M. 1�17 WEDNE LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA L Pledge of Allegiance IL Roll Call Commissioner Barker _ Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Stout Commissioner McNiel III. Annotmeements IV. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discrssion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 11734 - AMERICAN Y. RATIONAL - Reapplication for Design Review of modifications to the architectural product for 98 condominiums on 8.5 acres of land located nn the northwest corner of Arrow and Vineyard. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-20 - SH RMA - The development of a 3,691 square foot elementary school and two temporary trailers on 3/4 acres located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard - APN 208-241-09. C. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11663 - MARLEOROUGH - A development of 383 townhouse units on CO acres of land located on the east side of Archibald, south of Church Street - APN 1077-341-01, 1077-133-08, and 1077-631-03. D. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12171 - STEPHENSON - A custom lot subdivision of six lots on 3.3 acres of land in :he Very Low (VL) District, located at the northwest corner of Klusman Avenue and Whirlaway Street - APN 511-06-07. R K E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-11 - MACBETH - The development of an 80,332 square foot mini-storage facility on 3.56 acres of land in the General Indestrial District (Subarea 3) located near the southwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 209-031-43. V. Public Hearings _The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. Ail such opinions shah be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12650 - DEER CREEK - A residential development of 225 single amily lots on 147.16 acres of land in the Very Low Residential district located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of the Hillside Flood Channel, and north of Hillside Road - APN 201-121-16. G. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND LEWIS HOMES - A public nearing regardicg certain aspects of development rights pertaining to the Terra Vista Planned Community. VL New Business H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-09 - BATES ASHIRTELL/HAWKINS - The deveiopment of two office/industrial buildings totaling 29,184 square feet on 2.09 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 7th Street - APN 209-411-01. VIL Director's Reports I. BASE LINE MEDIAN DESIGN V11L Old Business J. CARYN DEVELOPMENT (COUNTY PROJECT) - Staff will present a brief overview of the Caryn Diiorio) residential development located within the City's sphere of influence north of Highland Avenue, south of Banyan, between. Milliken and Rochester Avenues. The focus of the presentation will primarily relate to design issues. ` , 1f 6 . i IX. Pu'alic Comments This is the time oral place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do riot already appear on this agenda. X. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. �F (l 4i, Y"ICINITY MAP ri I • WILb Mh••e � CMAEIE}MfJOIAI IAAA I 1 � WUyw. Y � YS CNAFFEv i•�•� �_--T_ -_------�i• h�M COLLEGE G...cw n� � m s • d • L � • N L � 'LIGNS P. C.T MALI •srwaYM•..w.�rtiw••.. YAyI 1 ®� Y�I FroIIL•: : ; 9 a em - • �: CYCI NQNGA-CUASTI QOU••• CFG GMwL IAVw OM1TtplO WENM1ATIONAL AI"ORT' CITY OF RANCHO COCAf ot#CA s - CI'I`Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA G ICAka� STAFF REPORT s z DATE: May 23, 1984 197' TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission. FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 11734 - AMERICAN NATIONAL Reapplication for Design Review of modifications to the architectural product for 98 condominiums on 8.5 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Arrow and Vineyard. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval of new elevations for the remaining phases of Tract 11734, Exhibit "B". This project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on December 19, 1980. The first phase has been completed and subsequent phases are preparing for construction. II. ANALYSIS: A. General : The elevations have been designed to eliminate the hip roof as shown on the previously approved elevations, Exhibit "Cu. in favor of a more traditional gable roof design, as shown on the proposed elevations, Exhibit "0". B. Design Review Committee: The Committee recommended approval subject to increasing the roof pitch on the single story element in the center of the building to provide a more balanced elevation appearance. III. RECOM14ENDATION: If the Commission concurs with the Design Review Committee's recommendation, approval of the elevation changes would be in order. Respe'tf lly submitted, Rick Gome) City Planner RG:DC:jr t•. ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Design Review for Tract 11734/r,merican National May 23, 1984 Page 2 Attachments_ Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations - Existing Exhibit "D" - Elevations - Proposed Oriainal Resolution of Approval Resolution of Approval for New Product Type �-aZ ir:�. j ,. 1 La ,4Y y I p V,�1 NORTH CITY IF 11734::: ITEN YGA 1� t.: :I l i l + . f . L'__.•V- I.1 L. 1 1. ff ll.. . 14, . ) ' •• �. _ tN1t Standards Oy�'I.a i b R.ION� ��.� 1 �-T.i i i� -►I.i i c.� j +•. r �/J' I� �3 1 �� 0 a i %c ••.Ted__ j �— �AMFNDIED( 2 NOD. cis�..�.,.................... TEIVTdT/LE T44 :Nv 1.,,4 ION.npYy10AV.,Nybl b.9./ b aO.IO OIaMww.O/.W.O d Mr.Y....a.wM.WCr fCY 14.Y10r V NURTH op I CITE' OF ITEMM: '1 RAINCHO CUCATMO\OA TITLE: -2!T e 1PL-AIK PL V NI\G DRIN(AN EXHIBIT- SCALE: u f. . A� ="7 NORTH CITY OF ITEM- 'Wm9eL PL NCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: MOO azdhooAs TG DINISION PLANNIN -11IMT. SCALE- --W M• AUU�UlIIII� � •Uryq � �� -1i .)�rw ,sue ti ,•,• ��dr-y>. - ..) 1.�^ / � .. rz NORTH RANCHO• ITEM: L71* . ' PlAINNING DIVEIONT SCALE.. `vk Y - <. r i ' RESOLUTION NO. 81-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11734 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11734, hereinafter "Map" submitted by DLV, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a total planned development of 98 condo- minium units on 8.5 acres of lard in the A-1 zone (R-3 pending), located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Vineyz.rd Avenue, APN 207-211-28 into 4 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on October 14, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WIiEREAS, the Planning Co.=ission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public_ hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucar„onga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11734 and the Asap thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to hu—mans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious oublic health problems; (f) The design cf the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Y, Resolution No. 031-_Z2 -- — - — Page 2 is (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11734, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions : PLANNING DIVISION 1. The actual placement of the buildings shall be in con- formance to the approved Architectural Site Plan, as shown on sheet 5 of 12. 2. A directory shall be provided near the entrance of the project to direct visitors to the appropriate units. ENGINEERING DIVISION 3. The developer shall widen the east side of Vineyard Avenue and the south side of Arrow Highway to accommo- date a left turn pocket in :he center of the street at the entrances to the projec•_. 4. The proposed storm drain at the northwest corner of the project shall be approved by the Flood Control District. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING CowlisSION OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAtIONGA BY: Jef r y�Kinq Chairma TY ATTEST: TEE ST: -- �-I.�.-�•� � 1 Secretary df the Planning Comission 1 , JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plannina Com;+issson held on the 146 day of Cctober, 1981, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: CO'vV-11SSIONERS: Rempel , Sceranka, Dahl , Tolstoy, King v NOES: COVNISSIONERS: None i ABSENT: COALoIISSIONERS: None t < C O 7 O� V L C ' p C •f O +'O Q. _ C O r �I G G O r J _ C _ r �<—r L _ in 9 n T C G U! C ••• _ .' V v w_. N � .Oi ' _ `- .O«i �W c r _u y ... o — C_ �C •' O E _ ._ Oi ' O C V 17O C = L O V C V T LGa-ou O _ r p W= 9 r - r N C_ N 4 U 6 n.. - — f y - J P O L n O •.CJ L Y W C- w« Y �j L r 4 "' _ _ — L — C 6 C V O O O.C L 6 4 _J L 7 v \t L _ C a =r V E O C 4 9 J 'n C C O. L > .n L N-_. •.' S V 3 n O L .b+ O C > 2 V« C n J C C _ C« C .0.r�i1j N .e O L � •f _n O _ C O C � �� 9 Y '•• - 12 4 cq _ M uc " - L r vC.' c� r'. 3 �=c u o L. pc L— 7 V L J C N.V. < —y V u 9 ' V r` 4+� k i V_] r y 4 L •• eJ C v � « _ � q i TO `> ____ VC i _ U r 4 C�pj <� C•N « c � � v � Tnuv or �' _ nu-� •� -'L� <_ +� L o_ n = oo I - uLr �r < O N s » N Ti le e 1 LJ� _� _ e .pw •' cN Nv = < - C s 10L, v CQ Yi 6� ^_O OC •nC O y_ 4P « CO Pt' � 6 S « N �V NO _ I C •—� Nr p Cr .O..0 � N LC NOV CG >r r —� O CzzO u > _ 6 IGr 6 .—.rV CO CW CN tl «L �» bLC ! C� a � < Nc fie .x. T< o o •':, - ec � sCC N_ 9Et F _ 1--- W e _ bo :a 4 plc c•No L�= o $ d o -4.� FPnL a �.o c uLu, o oq �� P -- No% -21=o 25 o a ji i� �- '_•o -o c +.o. c aaL Noi _ L -o i' `c y C GI G� _' cj •cv _« _- m > LC Esc «i c.o. _ ' - _- _:' ' $ � ` LNI O M el c ' __ .. 1Oj _ =•o'. _ Ln. `L cYr o`_ N «-3 c' oon o. .• 7 Ci _ -I ve «_ M'c Yn -,. c7 0. - ` cpo ro C '•o N .°i�� <« CI } r _ > .. _ ..� L � cL - c- b - - o ' •+ DILL ui _ El 0-10 o +1 ' :. - c_r 7�-� LL, < c L- = L ='• Lo..� NGN c—n c , p v ec- O ccu � — C_q ! ' .Vi. O G 4I �r � O� Ohb OL wS , �� l•� LUNO.L... �'= 9 ' O M= • ..I V _ FI _ G N1 _•V.. L J l M_ 9= y �•_ — > L V•— � � .. r •J Ot -. ly .1 4 _ t M V h p1 P Or C ! - �O O = _9 _ �� ti•9 � _ -J � N ' V4 ` O u `Ld G `�� 4CJpV �- n 4 '.` r4C Oq Gn c N Q•.CJ V1 � uC' � G_- .n _>V 0 •j 2 .. V c H? E - O O d _ -_...s .V `CV r Ci ri q N _ 00 = 12: V n _ J- M ` ' ` > .n ' O C �. n n..Ql O I V •n > « 4 N M i 6 G V _L 4 I w 6 r U C j y O V y^4 1 0 IN4 y C rd ?' d 4Nll C Irj� � q`N CnrOJ O_ V .. T O a= _ I V C• /D C CA n L_ L C L_. n. !` V .n dQA Ga �co v �'u .» c - � '•� oe� �_ � , .� = �_ ` C C C n n i � £Y= IC O r_ _ _ G I U D N G 4_,_; 'V�• 4 X o . c N oN 4 M -- c �• _- : o c== � •- big '-' o' v o ";� �, �c ��. c'. .d. � a oo n =y _o 9 V L O d N G L LG 14d0 b� L4 tr_ LL4 � t 9q cON VG Lr `rr nu 12 O C.i 4 C O " fJ 0 � u.�. G._J G' > O i "•C C V O r O n V.O.r L �c r E C.ri. p ' b G >r ^ � G•_�L4 O� � IN q �"'V Ott-.�a� -� T LIN _ _ _ Cq•i 'n ' LG '-J Lrn GC L �4 9 .rr.N - C �p ' O = GN4�> -� w--J• �- 9 `7� ? 4l V��_ n Y v .LN. _rc _ _ �_ a - - _ _ � L c_c � � o w� _ - D= `_'._L>e 9_• � `� V r L = r V C C V N.. _ _ C ` :. \�,__ r _ O• N Y� �� _ N _ � `9==P G J^ � V ty G�� "i u N C C+d C r•] '__ 4 4 G� V L � ��r ' D C N CLj L T u O.r < < O .� �� C.P.r O C 6 L .S c. V ?. � O N m V N <G�.• '� �` 4 J�9 �." `u C ` �� Xf I _ " =` Wit _ L .. i.- _ _ - ' = - o-r' - -:✓. y..� " _ o - TIC � ` a � i cep a i r vU�- Du .-i•✓ q •n .J• y �•'� � Or - � .nl � C - dd0 -_�.i _ _ n., d O r'r✓ J � - u� 1 J G A S V C� 7 L 7 r +V-, O •n - r ' C V r= , _�n L •s } , 4 ' i E •vo e L 21 El ✓ 4 ^`• �7 7 ? ma c � -i. U N � r - L O Y > ' -� C J 0 ^ � -O O j -V. = .•• O _ [r C V I I y O -- J V G= p! .n0 O} ± =�_ v VJiaO S '-' .- �_,= OVCD - LI �� L O "• ✓ V O V 6•• t q V .Jr. S .! q' : " V a < D V •�I L C CY w I I V < 9 V " - C= - r G ._ > " ! C C O -v a •w O fj .Oin✓ C -: n_S - -r_ � _ CGC - O r �' -r r. 15J-J r_ is = __-`. _r-_ J O _ _ _ a d n V J 9 S ✓- C � 7 V O•_� :._ Xbi 7 „= LUnQ _ Va= In _'� y ?7L - r � O O r.n �_ _-4 n L ^-r r O C .n C O✓ _ 3 _ 4 d G O_^� L U _ C L Y �` 4 P a p } = � C= UOCy V� rV_`J Vr•n•r O p Cb Lr L � . VCC u. GC U .�-. O u ✓ - C Cr` O• "! 4 v.r Va d_ O J- vdedLL .`,. 40•nCN� C C CC._ OD wPw LAG � J L NO L r CI Cu. >.r U-J V •' V •C O J r T Y 9 ' C l O ` C G_ C O r 4 C^d.E -J ---. •J} O C r rl 9 S '-�✓ 'e J- GM IrV L U C�n C LL f. Y � V -J_ V ^l•J __Lac c _ _ -- n •-�.- an vmu ` vve ruPc '.c. c•�.-_j woe_ -� _�� ^o..� - - _ .- `r � o d✓ _ � c ..n iz, ' _•_' Oa.-`0 = v_ Ga CgC .n C: } -_ a0 � _ 4C.i V OCR - .nG-�=_ _ _ L nT 7 � _'.. 0 a _ 4 =✓ \- 4�ry � ..] L .LnG ` wr n C=? b C_ S a r p _ _ - C V > O _ t ] o V __ - a O✓ - a J+ ` - u _ L G _ ? =✓ r u r n .. V r a _ V -� i ..0 4 r 0�yC r C y} � j d' i n L P • J w L� �.LSV= Ur� r >•n L � � � ...._. .. .U. �' y � "� ^ 9 � ` `i rT o= =u�. .� `• r _ oe s r,^ rise c ✓a.r c. 3a�c5 <cuv"'� .n S.o. ac I oV -c = i •^y W C _ L <p � � v .nV LV7 _7 y I �- F. J � � C- a_ -, C = I I •e3 �' - vV "' C o _ � c rz 1 4-.r ci me i c C s' o ' -4-• i - �� 1 — i 1 I � e = G VL44 _ < P` M �' i'``. '_— ` m ..� - y --.a L :__� EMT uco• � c : -v r 4u '^oYc O_� u y 1j 6 F V C `0 3= L� £' r r.". n `L X I � _ 9 r >M_•- O T r C -v Y q�= O T C U .. i' wL G _U »j _ Z - y I I C ` _ -_C M�r Td -_ Llxl `r4 9 -�� __ .nl '�» � r= Idyl 1 I '1 Tn•u O4 � -�u u n r L - C 7 ..4ru OI vl ri LaV .' L__ Y q q r I t u7 0 u Vvr"�' SG p Ian ✓ 7 C r 'r L r^ >. V - <�-z _ C'JL __� Z •p - I -_J CCr u �� ar - V �n V n _ __ _ C_ • 'J L ' _ _ J •� _ O 17 es O7 4 C• I 1 < rO WL CG 4r�� C^ ALL � ^I Millz. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTI014 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 11734 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW AND VINEYARD IN THE IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 9th day of April , 1984, a complete application was filed by American National for review of the above-described project: and 'aHFREa.t, nr. the 23rd day of May, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is cons stent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in a:cord +ith the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and r 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the pr _osed use, together with the conditions applicable cnereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tract 11734 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: 1. Raise ridge line in the center portion of building for a more balanced elevation appearance. 2. All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract 11734 contained in Resolution 81-122 shall apply. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23rd DAY OF MAY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Dennis L. Stout, Chairman f1_�y ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Piai:ning Commission held on the 23rd day of May, 1984, by the following vote-co-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: C` T CITY OF RANTCHO CUCAMONGA �,)cAA4Q� STAFF REPORT A DATE: May 23, 1984 19 I TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission f FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDI'IONAL USE PERMIT 82-20 - SHARMA The development of a 3,69. square foot elementary school and two temporary trailers on 3/4 acres located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard - APN 208-241-09. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant, Satyendra Sharma, is requesting a 6-month time extension for Conditional Use Permit 82-20, as described above. The project was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission on November 10, 1982, per the attached Conditions. The proposed elementary school was an expansion of the existing Foothill Learning School as shown on the attached Exhibit JOINS, I IBIS. Th4 two temporary trailers were intended to be used as classrooms during construction of the permanent building addition. The new addition would house a library/resource center, offices and classrooms for kindergarten through 3rd grades. The temporary facilities were required to be removed within two years from the date o{ placement on the site or be removed from the site within 30-days from the date of occupancy of the permanent addition, whichever came first. Further, the Conditions of Approval required that building permits for the addition be obtained within twelve (12) months from the date of occupancy of the temporary facilities. To date, no plans have been submitted for the addition. Also, the Conditions of Approval required completion of certain work prior to moving the trailers onto the property, as outlined in the attached letter dated November 12, 1982, sent to the applicant. One temporary trailer was moved onto the property several months ago in violation of the Conditions of Approval requiring completion of certain items. The applicant was contacted and recently began work toward completing these items. Recent inspections by the Planning and Building and Safety Divisions indicate that only a portion of the work has been completed. Further, the Foothill Fire District requires installation of an approved water system and on-site fire hydrant prior to occupancy of the trailer, as outlined in the attached letter dated April 30, 1984. The applicant has indicated that the trailer would be removed; however, as of writing, it has not been removed. j:. ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 82-20/Sharma May 23, 1984 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: The Conditional Use Permit approval will become null and void if final occupancy is not issued for the temporary trailer or building permits are not issued for the permanent addition by May 10, 1984. The applicant is requesting a six (6) month time extension in order to prepare plans for a new school prototype. The project was approved on November 10, 1982, with an expiration date of May 10, 1984. The Development Code permits applications for CUP's to be valid for a total of four years from the original date of approval with a maximum twelve (12) month extension increment. Therefore, the Planning Commission could grant an extension up to two and one-half years. A copy of the original staff report, Resolution of Approval with Conditions, and Planning Commission Minutes of the November 10, 1982 meeting are attached for your review. III. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve a 5-month time extension and direct the applicant to complete those items listed in the letters from staff and the Foothill Fire District. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez City Planner P.G:DC:jr .Attachments: Letter From Applicant Requesting Extension Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations November 10, 1982 Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 1982 Letter to Applicant April 30, 1984 Foothill Fire District Letter Resolution of Approval 82-107 Time Extension Resolution of Approval i u r r� BARMAKANI I r °FNT OFpT. ; 0 7 AIM 7i81911Q113i12�' 12iig� 6 May 3 , 1984 a Y L- I' {�{ City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Dan Coleman 9340 Baseline Road Alta Loma , CA 91701 RE : Foothill Learning School 84- 131 Dear Dan , This letter is to request an extension of conditional use permit n:l¢Ser 82-20 for a six month period from May 10, 1984 at which date the present approval will expire . Satyendra K. Sharma has renuested that our office prepare design studies for a new school prototype. We have a meeting scheduled with Mr. Sharma next week to determine his needs and establish criteria for the new • hildren ' s learning center. -hank you for your assistance in this matter. sincerely, ANDREW BARMAKZAN President AB/np 1i.0U T1 l�(!:.rCI'1 PP �.'GIt1••r:�,rQ 6 -3 ♦ J � t yl' +I ' ■ � . n8u�in�� . e1 ♦ �� J t • , NORTH r Ap • y -» , 'r! r l 01 40 u' . 1_- _ 1 I r✓ss t��i�_ ♦ I rE.ar.fTrRO.aC.✓ i ;' �t •1' 1•i �d . •, - mot' ` g �� l �.-o.�, = -• _gin n�: -_•:� � _ _ . . '�} I '� � �� it �� LE sr �+em 1'%rasF✓/l.4vice �' I �r 1. � •.i � i Iit[ P - I ♦ 1. I dl ; ] 1 ` � Ec•.r .i.�. �}-if4A'/NG is 2 `Ot \ 14 • A. I -_- K \ o A (4i P�Snr. I" V j r qI ---= - a , I C �t.si !n•..c_.4-'•a .� •i•,+. 1 /63 NORTH CITY m RANCHO CUCNNIO\G3 zi�;. E: Sj7w PL•1V\INTI\G DIT%rNO.N, E iHI��t`'i=_ CGALE: �'ti Ii 1 �-u rr \ i is 111' 1� 6;Xq `.. 7 i o g CITY OF 00 RANCHO C;C- �IO`G� TITLE "P PLANNING DI`ISION EXHIBCT: SCALE-®° _ i Motion: M---=d by marker, seconded b_a Stout, carried ILnan� to adopt Resolution No. 82-v5 approving zone change 32-0 recommending such to the City Council. Nfoticn: Moved by Reapel corded by Mc Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution ?:o. 82-1 approving Tentative Tract 12256 with the added condition that the to f ock access remain unobstructed and tat this be shown in the CC&R' H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS;.ENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 82-20 - S?4RMA - Me development of a 3.b91 square foot elementary school on 3/4 acres in the R-1 zone, located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard - APN 208-241-09• Associate Planner, Dan Coleman, reviewed the staff report. Chairman King asked where the temporary trailers are and whether they would be used during construction or to house new students in order to have new construction. Mr. Coleman replied that the students ir. the existing school would not be affected in that the shift of playground area would be the only change. ® Chairman King asked ,hat happens to the playground when he puts up the temporary facilities, he constructs the facility, where then is the playground. Mr. Coleman explained the required mini—im of playground space for preschool children as mandated by the State code indicating that there is more than double the space he needs for outside recreation. Chairman King asked why the applicant can't construct the permanent facility before putting in the trailer. L:airman King opened the public hearing; Fir. Sharma, 7W5 Sunstone , the applicant, replied that he needs the trailer for the time being as he does not have space and is not in a financial position to begin building right now. He indicated he must refuse children every day. Commissioner Mc Niel asked, aside from what is laid down in the tent regard_g conditions, what his plan is. Mr. Snarra replied it is to build a new school in Pancho Cucamonga. Commissioner Mc Niel asked how far into the future this would be. Planning Commission ;-mutes -18- November 10, 1982 "r i" Shar—_ replied within 1-2 years. Coleman stated that he would have to move the trailers on within 18 months. Luring the 18th months he would have to get permits and begin construction within one year with a permanent structure within two and a half years. M•-. Fop-son stated that the trailer would be good for 18 months and could stay there for two years so what the Commission is looking at is a three and a half year total. COm issi.:ner MC Niel asked what time period Mr. Sharma is locking at. Mr. Sharma replied that ae would like to do this in September. Commissioner Mc Niel asked what kind of trailer this would be. Mr. Sharma replied that -it would be 12 X 60 feet. Commissioner :M:Niel asked how many students there would be in the trailer. Mr. Sharma replied there would be approximately 30 in each trailer. Cnairman King stated it would be his feeling that condition two should read that the building permit and the placement of the trailer on the premises should be simultaneous and the trailer should not be allowed on the premises any longer than 12 months. Commissioner Mc Niel stated that if he understands the condition, it would defeat the purpose. Chaff--=an King replied that perhaps it does. Commissioner i;cNiel asked where it is prf7posed to put the trailer. Mr. Sharma pointed it out for Commissioner 116Niel. Commissioner King stated that perhaps he is being unfair and unreasonable and that he does not cant to push it but earlier there were many problems with a Condit onal use permit compliance with the Sharma school and he does not relish seeing a trailer on Foothill Boulevard for three and a half years considers g the recent past history the City has had with !L. Sharma. Fe indicated that given the fact that this is approved, there will be trailers with construction over a three ana a Calf year period and he foresees the playground conditions to be extreme_Ly crow-tea. Commissioner Barker asked if staff Coul'i refer to the generation of funds and asked Mr. Snar.a if he ccu'_d afford to do tbis in any other way. Planning Commission. ;Minutes -14- November 10, 1982 M- Sharma replies that he only needs it for two years at the most and could perhaps go into construction within one year. Mr. Coleman asked if Mr. Sharma could generate the money. Mr. Sharma replied he probably could but it would be difficult. Commissioner Stout askew how long the building permit would be effective for a project like this. Commissioner Remoel stated that it depends on certain, phases of work being performed within. certain periods of time. Dan Coleman stated that the U7:; Attorney has requested that conditions 2 be modified to read that the temporary facility shall be removed within 2 years from the date of occupancy or shall be removed from the site within 30 days from the date of occupancy of Lhe permit addition, whichever comes first. Commissioner Rempel stated that in other words, the trailer cannot be on the site for more than 2 years. There was brief discussion among the Commission or. how long the trailer could occupy the site. Commissioner Barker stated that for 2 years of occupancy, or whichever came first is the wordi_-.g that is not there. 'r'r. Vairin stated that if the applicant decided to build earlier, say a year from now, and he occupied it, then he is not going to maintain the trailer, he will have to remove it and that is why it is worded in this manner. Motion: .loved by Rempel seconded by Stout, to adopt Resolution No. 82-107, with a revision to item one under Planning conditions, revising the time period to two years from 12 months. Commissioners Barker, Mc Niel and King voted no and the motion did not carry. TM�tion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried, that the word occupancy be changed to the :cord installation iZ the previous motion. Chairman {i-ig votes. no because of his previously stated concerns regarding the applicant 's adherence to conditions imposed by the Commission. � • � f s i$. Gomez rem=sae .. this :teeting would adjou:-, to November 18 for an %ti::anda Specific Plan hearing. Plan: g Commission Minutes -20- November 10, 1982 j, �-9 f t ° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA z A 7 xeye.Jon D. 3Iikris iiZ Charles 1.Buquet I: James C.Frost t[ichnd>I. Dahl Phillip D.Schlosser November 12, 1982 Satyendra K. Sharma 9113 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 _ SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 82-20 Dear Mr. Sharma: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission at its meeting of November 10, 1982, approved your request for Conditional Use Permit 82-20, subject to the attached conditions of approval. In order that the preschool expansion may proceed smoothly, I would like to clarify your responsibilities under the conditions of approval. It is our understanding that you intend to move the temporary trailers onto your property by September 1983. Prior to movino the trailers onto your property the following work must be completed: 1_ The parking lot must be expanded to add four parking spaces - Condition =4. 2. Trees and shrubs must be planted along property lines. This requires submitting landscape and irrigation plans to Planning for review and approval - Conditions =6 and =C-1. 3. Striping the drivewav "Fire Lane" and posting "No Stopping" signs - Condition =8. 4. Drainage improvemaits to the existing parking lot - Condition =9, S._. 93M BASELINE RO aD,SLTIT C • POST OFFICE 80X �0 /RAKCBO CCCa310\Ga.CALIFOILN-J ,91730 • (714)989.18si C _ 1 .- Satyendra K. Sharma November 12, 1982 Page 2 Please contact Jerry Grant, Chief Building Official, concerning drainage im- provement questions. I would recommend that work on the above-listed items begin as soon as possible to avoid unnecessary delays next fall. Should you have any other questions, please call me at (714) 989-1851. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT M"„RTMENT PLFuJNki�ttio-�I1,�I S I ON ��+' � DAN COLEMN _ Associate Planner DC/kep Attachment: RResolutio off Aogroval with Conditions Negative 6eclara ion ® cc: Jerry Grant .y, t, r FOL ,HILL FIRE PROTECTION Dom:,CR.ICT P. 0. Box 35 CI i Y OF R NCK CUCAh1OhGa eE23 Ar-neihysi Street COMMU'gITY DEVEI OPrAENT DEPT. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91701 MAY '1984 (714) 987-2535 � _ 7t819t1Qell`]2i3j2131 0 b 30. 1984 jjr. Satyerdra Sharma, Owner Foothill Learning School 9113 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Sharma: This letter of intent wili reflect the under- standing reached at our meeting April 27, 1984 , concerning the Fc -hill Learning School : 1. The trailer presently on the property cannot be used in any way until an approved water system and hydrant are installed or. site. 2. hater system plans will be submitted to this office within 30 days from this date. 3 . The trailer will be removed from the property within 30 days from this date if you fail to submit water system plans. 4 . Any future construction projects of any type or size will not commerce until such plans have been approved by this office. This includes portable construction such as trailers. tie look forward to your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours , ClfCin - �" /-7 Susan D. Wolfe Jim W_ Bowman Fire Prevention Ins p..ctor Fire Marshal mbm cc: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Dept. of Comm. Development City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Commission State of Calif. co.:,munity Care Licensing State Fire Marshal' s Office l RESOLUTTON NO. 82-107 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 82-20 FOR TEMPORARY TRAILERS AND BUILDING ADDITION FOR A PRESCHOOL AND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOCATED AT 9113 FOOTHILL IN THE R-1 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 3rd day of September, 1982, a complete appiication was filed by Satyerdra Sharma for review of the above-described project; and "AS, on the lUth day of November, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. follows: NOW, 1EEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public heaith, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on November 10, 1982. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 82-20 is approved subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. The temporary facilities are approved and shall be removed in two years from the date of placement on the site or shall be removed from the site within thirty (30) days from the date of occupancy of the permanent addition, whichever comes first. 2. That building permits shall be obtained for the permanent building addition within twelve (12) months from the date of occupancy of the temporary facilities. Resolution Mo. 52-1 i Page 2 v 3- As a Conditional Use Permit, this approval shall become null and void if final occupancy is not issued for the temporary facilities or building permits issued for the permanent addition within eighteen (18) months from the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Co-Mission. 4- The temporary facilities shall not be located on the site until the parking lot expansion is complete. 5- Expansion of the preschool beyond 48 children or expansion of the K-3 beyond 60 children will require approval of a modified Conditional Use Permit. 6. Landscaping, including trees and shrubs, shall be planted around the south and west perimeter of the property, and between the parking lot and the playground. 7. All laws and regulations of the State relating to the licensing of children's day care facilities and elementary schools shall be complied with. S. The existing circulation aisle along the east side :)f the existing structure shall be provided with pavement striping stating "Fire Lane" and "No Stooping", signs posted in clearly visible locations. 9. The following improvements are required in the existing parking areas to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official : (1) repairing depressions in the pavement for proper drainage, (2) construction of a drainage structure to carry water from the parking area to the drainage opening in the south block wail, and (3) removal of the curb along the southerly boundary of the parking lot and replacement with a Portland concrete cement curt, and gutter in accordance with the approved Grading Plan for CUP 81-03. These improvements shall be completed in conjunction with the parking ;be at facilities. expansion prior to occupancy of the temporary 10. A sample of the building materials shall be submitted to the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. t., i Resolution No. 82-1U/ Page 3 EENGINEERING DIVISION: 11. A landscaped median island is required along Foothill and a median island lien agreement on in- lieu cash deposit shall be required prior to issuance of building permit. 12. Street lights are required along Foothill Boulevard. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS IOTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1982. PLANNING C ISSION OF T' �ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 BY: Jeff y ' g, h n ATTE Secretary of the 71>1&anning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comrtnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of November, 1982, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Stout, Barker, Mchiel, Rempel NOES: COMMISSIONERS: King ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None Y: rk; w QI v \\\ -�V >•j 1 J r V r « �j r w C q' > L r L q.J L n` qe qu � y b y � 4 � a.: - � ,eb � rL .•r - ' Lu �r L V Ln >aV � Lq f � 0 O � aO > L .n— � w V � >. o o � ? dcr` or c � ic-•. « L L Lo oL o'� .. 2w c " � o « c '• a i 't �: o^ ^c�.r .L, a = qT � nc � L .°.' n .�. o � o b _+ u .. `_cv •Go q p� :..c. +- e` = c�y _ o'c - _.>J>• r °'` � anv o >o-¢-: 4� o ae ai nai, y i N Ntr.«•r E u L n O. .� 0 J � �w= � Sl ur _ d _y « L C T V L : V-O• >d .L.•L•a �• 0 C +. L V L 6 —^ C b p ^ V=L w u_x V V G_O_ r=rr� LP <• pw « J +. y J I O p �� w r C 4 r C O L u ] C_C n O L w C O q O` N C � "L• C V W `u P=•'O•C «� O 6V a` � C Ga_ CJ CL' LV. GV�!S �N COV ��r Vlr GQ M 6V qp CM d= > rC L �V •L^ V = E ' C LV •Jn l ji ]n6dOx p yC n� GU`u L'r Cd' pew' ^Vb � CJ �I Cw r V_ C w. N 4 C 9 N O yl G � I•Cr C V+ C� O V '� « U «V W y k �•rnr y_ G a > > l e P d Lz ^ i W� � i cud cG r+L .. c w`..b•c" c :� a- c pI I I N —' N ^ � Vs N � L V r' •.q � ^O Lq � N o b O✓ x = q d `J� M � •dry _� r q Mw � « JrV l0 r « Gw � • 2 q r 4� T� � q �w �.= w` C � C O O �' ! w p _V O V S C _ P q y q C C _L CI C v•�• 'V •n t r = x :5+u c CS wC+ _ o + a N^ �y c t:- i eEIN � =ti Cf S C O d L C V O rV.r CI O u 4 O Y q u V L V V \ LO y V V y r u O C V_V P r« n C -rr C � _ O C y O C « � •J L w O L � O � � j� -- � .oL.> '� vV ` c.� •+ u� � Co PY_ i5c rou qc �:p �c � \� �� —+ r i c >` q m:4 ` ^ _ •q `c 9+ b �`y — o c` o -aq v ? V G .� ? O�G .�= LLC OJ �a.w.r ql0 cab C+ f rdn L 4yJ VI rSrrd � 'c� nc�- Lar °•� on i cv ^' 77 III GV LOrq qy YV 9 ^rir _ C r G q J L•cn y u .� r 4 �r C� N C V O <G«Ci• C .Oi• � •�� 7 b w C 0 � C S ! r` L C 7 7 O �- 9r L � i r r0 r 9 •G _G I LL LC •f j _` t 6� FLr C 9 V •f ' _ O •.O•C L r` 4 L 6 S C S C I • O q c -• - � v v - I � q � ` r nCr cc - �C CLq 4 •n LC GC L � G� d ~ � V Gr i. .. c cJ iv` i - 3 I I "' c - a u� G �• oV r - ra 7� O yC rd� L r � •� � � rua` 9L` • IQL - ` - �. _ VJO`•� r _ rO = > •n Ll CC • (1l VV L ._ vOr� � CrO O V q ` ~q .n f l` d •n r N ; 4 C LV =L 4 ` I•qn a L L _ O L J C� C. C Ci C• 9 C._ � 9 L S: U C I_ �O � � _ V O _ o •' - Imo Lo .r. � LI _u N q _=� .'^ c -_ = .°. Sip DID ? `v cyc C= _y9 ¢'� G ¢ E ti I cVC _LV - :-J� w a •^V` 7? L = •" '(C, ^a r O L ` r C V I •' O O r _ 14 _ O O i�]` •^O - ^ 2L_ V•[L wC• __ _ 4 O � �uu \ i� �rG 49n � • V C u•` C _ q > r v � � Vy U4u C � � � � qLq i`nt � i •Ci. r N�� >.�..r� = �S •n G - _ _ , 1 L S L ` .] O V w ` ( � �l C L L C d o cqi .r •no c-G\i i=M. i I PI I I ^1 W - c N �.�. V V - C.F. � .n ' __ a-i O r y N•_ _ C+4 r q F V L G r _ U_ � F � -i.•� Q •r C'_ C y- G= r. V L w L N 'r 9.n L q F• _�_ J q� v C j C �r vV..L C •a O C - b _ _ _ p L = V G O O r - nv . r C ` 4 r •n V E_ r V G _r_O _T .� •.0. V^ - a L M V V C C fz 9 O Vd VVr �w.0 4�rd L rp L [n •Li•dL 4_ `•_••� rV N C w L G L � bL Ur c� = 0 % V.] � C•O C� -q Cr d= q _ .nV O •U.r JO L •n� C.-J C"V O! rCC O y�L - r L hCrL •n •a G O L� EO C r P �� y�=� •-.V r �y C > P P V C 9 N t >Sqi � - _r b O _ U - � j 4 l TJ r G C_ E L V O C k C Ltf qC N v V r L _ •n r C• L' O r w 6 75 ' SC 6 q •-i• CZ L raj GV ^JV= r�rL r q { C r_ GO •oVL qr GC �r OV7N UG n' --r O'C9 VL \ L v � a L .`ii - _ � = e �v..: C °• =o.." -- cT �gooc c o 4c$ m I _ ` py cL ' 4 c+c _ +•_ q � _•fin - „Vr U.� - � P_ CV r= V .� G � Ly L - _ 9 V VF Gr Ocr O .• aC _ O L J E a r q = _r S � �� o _r � O =� ' •C q O L C l r r� � L _ r n L U r _ _ L C C r •rn�r 4 M � w C _ _ •^ a C r 4'•y u• C.. __ a_ _ � '^9 V40r��? Cr 4C.1 �� \ht q 4Lr G 9c ^• > E Cr2 Sam C 6 Tl' C `.r oT +•O i •CL VL � wr� O NqV •� < vO <9 < C�u�awk� VL <� OG LC O p ti nJ L � = G J- •n � m V U P - � N 2 .� .. u V = V 6 C .C. C 'P A ^� G' lO G c-•7 G G V V ^ <^ r COG q < O I I I I O Y y-, O �-O•G \d 'Jr Um _ V - ^ I eTi ^ I I m .• o _ ^ r .' u ..... qo -% c`1" �-� G -c � _ L I I i u ly .... ._ J G .• �-� j G y.J ' � L C q G V m �� G m 0 �- �.^ < �7 y 9 f n I � � I P.0 y m � J• a.L � � _� - q r� "J O.u C y'V o ` G L V O.- r_ �` O--i. � I I m y I c � 3 N •^ 9u� V2 jy N m rVC Nly ...i >?� V � � .J 'I i u66 OC O _ zz v f.:� � LJ gNUOi T G�� VOm � O� NC UdOJV r O NCO N C � � Dr� P q L.L.. 6q D UOr NOV �Gr'.' ...q Gu � r ? V '�•] m L _ > O .�. G Nl O ] _D-. q Vr� qV�J > G> N • rI L ^ _c._= � _ '_ off j _ _ o G up- -� cA` PW_ � - C� _ c = _ �•• n_ V O V O N r C.^ V vs O r < LOi � G.•L O s `� u q � � _41 - - - � :v r - d e r-, -c GP Ct _ r• r_ _ .'..r .. ✓ - ... LC•r O 2 S= TG �•r• oN c -g _ _ 4 4 N l A M L •i V V _ a Y -pip- o - V? r. r 0_ W9N L. G ? =^Jr gLUJ V VCd LL � JNS� >NC C ` CS PM >.� 9 '• r -J �r.? 9 O ..- m_ _m G N n ^J V C`` L .. ] V V P I L__ r O m L L V 'i C - T = O � > M - 4 O_^- `�_ T��V ._U 9.:�u C G., � GC -� =Y u V -Y.•^J C L A � m �� O 7 wV _ l �-• O _ _I r � 0 L� > N S 9 I N N P p0=_ r LS�.O. C7.-.c - -Ci- I ... _ _ d- � A � � l 7_O •� U -tiV "J C.L _N G 3•' q PON _ a W _ 4 � �c. C O O_L` !n u 'w ._L r 4 i .e V G rl .O m N � ' � �•+ .. i 'V - �N >= N- � ugC .J =� �� .J - .e `�C ri V •^_n !LA � l UC A J - '• G` J - n O`V � C.. v-J O �'O .r V V -J m _q�V CJ d O_• - �L 6 V C G_ ] _ C C r �J r_ > _I U C V r O j ... V r_ O G C� .n •' V 'e r A - V _ f ^ 4•]_ _ ' ^ - O G G - _ O L %. • W '_r N .". .n u J m L O C O V � ... C _ .J•_] - _ � r - _ W V G.n _� '^6 r'urr'• V r" '^ L nr � - ] - m L .G._ !. _ .- m q L`y Q � L.- •c`� u L `A C yC __ _ _ - O N V N ]<' c J_ `I -J= JV l- a.0. •,�� '� Cr � M. L �V G Om SC,rr �-„ VL � NCC L r•L -[ �I Vv_ L � O.V O�nj_ d OV4- V L OC < �1 'JO CC `N >( "�'v0 VNN� 6 U 6V7LV N VV CG ±I VG rG V Svr.S -c m P < ! V 1 G F j V O C 1I v`C C4C y :.• �• -0 Or y � J I Vy C� y= V 6 � _ J L y G j •. - 7 l _ 4 .n - .n_ 4 G �� U U • ` C V r ^ ` Y C C � �V _ I } I O � u u Y G - G V l u > >• :Y � C? � u U O L = .] O � I I I � v r r r _ O':J \L•_ Gl D � - C+ `.7 D.r. >` � •" q I � I t 4 'J 7r .J _ - O Sl G J _ � Q .7 Y i � _^ n C U M 4 V r I-J ' n � •r ) P � D .n G U_ Jl r ? n C V �.� 1 U U_r q.7. .n _u=.. I✓ U V 7 �.. `n ' •+` L� � � OV .nO v.:a yI f Y ?.•' O C7 N ^ n Q .•' I I �� _T` - .n cr. c - ' 4- �Vi• O � O 6 L •n .0 c d i � O V Y ' u ` _ r� •n y • _ nY•ir - ^ n^ 4 ~ � �• ""� S �.r.• l �I Gn .n I _ _ O CrC � d Ol I^- 9 _y � I I � •. O r ^ 9 ^n 17 16} r c C � -• r 7 4 �� O .� V O 4 � 4= O �- .7 - S� C E d ' � -J 'S"/•Isell, C V OCK tV G �.- - ' j ` .4n ... 1 I BOG rU yr ^ •n _ � V� G 4JL C`_ L� � � CC -L. 9C r �=I ``'y-I-- �1 D O r+.fO V"C �. y 4C .L.• YyO �__ .'. O �_ ✓ a C .eO VY O r...il I LCn CV4q r = 4t � ^- rJr4 UFO iJ GC JY .nCd ` � ��. _.0. �•D •♦ V� Ya � `1V J.OiYn =rC � -_ `_• � .� � .�_ I `_ I ' j � I O � �C Jrr - _w �y r � C�J c T- n v� ^ c u�m .. - _ 1•^� : I c ., m o-, Y tee . c .^. o r Y- '_4 - O � U. 4 - _ ` d i�G I I 1 I .] Z � •n c C C-� b P�� O G C y O r n�i. "=. 0 '- - _� .•I r.vc e - ro j<¢ I I I I I P tee._ �rr n.. � -� � - - �-err �vG -- v_I+' ��. yj ` .'• c" o> -� I I 1 �1 � q .o.- c — 5•<. e°' �iJcd - c r+V c<c s` b I I OI }' r ` NO- Gr 'J O- <V G ~ •... Vrr N j o} I t r. L') 7 �-.'J �4 '♦ G �J 9 9_ � � •o 1 ^ u q •n _ 4� p `•� 1 O M O w d 9.L• C O C n Z C�w O ` E � ML= O •ui• f r y r` d O L �> O Cup' L J.� V__OM ` a0•w C� t Lr . L_ ^l0 OVA V r��J C � C you 7u6u '�L• i< C ` i G C i .n 6 V r E O, ayC' O •n= _ O r G 3 • __ O Ci e _ _7 I L O ^ � "7 �� _ _ _ I +• Guu w j O %w _ V y O r O t0•�r � CJ � C "" C.M = •'f s• A G O � _ �i � L ~O r� _ _� <• � V O. � � L � t c+n J V S CI mE =o � �� aX � 1 4 nor., « � � =� �_ =� �—=•_ << RESOLUTION NO. 82-107-A A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONSA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT R2-20 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above-describes project, pursuant to Section 17.02.1008 of the Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-described project. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comrnission has made the follo.siRg findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed marke:. climate for this project. B. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to tie public health, safety, or welfare, or ;materially injjrious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That there has been no significant changes to the Land Use Element, Development Code, or character of the area in whi=h the project is located that would cause the approved project to become nonconforming or inconsistent with current standards. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Project Applicant Expiration CUP 32-20 Sharma November 10, 1984 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis T. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secret >ry Ri,si'lution No. I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission helu on the 23rd day of May, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: o'— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 23, 1984 1 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dar. Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11663 - MARLBOROUGH - A development of 383 townhouse units on 40 acres of land located on the east side of Archibald, south of Church Street - APN 1077-341-01; 1077-133-08; 1077-631-03. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a time extension for the Marlborough Villas townhome project currently under construction on the east side of Archibald Avenue, south of Church Street. As shown on the attached Exhibit A, approximately two-thirds of the project has already recorded and been constructed. Specifically, ® the time extension request would allow additional time to record final maps for Tracts 12026 through 12031, as shown on Exhibit "B The project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on June 10, 1981. 11. ANALYSIS: A review of the project indicated that the site plan and uilding design are consistent with the new Development Code and all other applicable City standards and ordinances. III. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the maximum twelve month time extension be granted for this project. The new expiration date would June 10, 1985. Respectfully submitted, A Rickmev City P?ar(ner RG:DC:ns Attachments: Letter from Applicant Requesting Extension Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions Time Extension Resolution of Approval .r . x' ITEM C 1 Stanley C. Morse COr nsulting Civil Engineers, inc. Planning, Engineering, Surveyingg. May 7, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9230 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 TENTATIVE TRACT 11663 T•o Whom it May Concern: On behalf of our client Marlborough Development Corporation, we hereby request an extension cf approval of the sub;ect tentative map for the maximum period of time allowable under ate law and local ordinance. Sincerely, -- r V , -Gary Vl.,Dokich Executive Vice President cc- Paul Byrnes, Marlborough Development Corporation Enclosure: Check in the amount of $62.00 for processing fee GWD:cg r errF = 11 u. It "SAY t.gib! u 198,; 713i91AH'Z"A-'Jr4;1 7 NORTHWOOD TOWN CENTER 0 4860 IRVIN BOULEVARD 0 SURE x201 s IRVINE CA 92714-1299• (714) 730-7117 SITE UTILIZATION MAP OWNER/DEYl�09ER ENOINEER TRACT NO. IISS3 ® .. ... ....... ....> ......... A' i�S } #.: �iL• �. ~w.+ .. I�a,�—++s� �`lb�:'f�.0�i.-.:�1_S;S�j Rs ��`i� r., 1' �: iA�f ^' ' mac e' .R T �•S ::. :fld.-= �p4;.'...�hR '.�� 4� a.t } ,*•{ �i,�� -a _ 7 _Y::St'S:SE"its--'•fi7i2tf::7 ++}r 1 !-ems - t - L�Yl.:Cb.:..•_e:3+.:r S a+-`y�Sf -ys s3•�9.•y'T-. 1•i;L I i. ,'it�9. rr a.. ar\ ' •.' f a1 '� `Y .^ Sal � N K -' �:{_ . -_•° .�� r...--. '� �:� � 4 'r�—„= YI'3 =ie_ i t. _ems 40-P " FesA!��. .-.-ve•en 1 NRRc ier .�r.l -_ � 'f i -�.i�'�..u.aai.•"—� •w ~T� � ~_ ilaK3 vr•.i vm'.a� A rQ LAt,4,f i - a =•� �( _ < Y 1Z7f�...: jai 7®O. j��. fl�(4j�T `�PYi� ti d .. ` •y -is^ ! i' 4 �"T T_!��',rr�A •'t- 7' i ..+ } yd n y.c A. Cf SJ�' •' � t �w�3'r� ..i-.�^_ Z iT�: ,t�'�.i�� 'i+�..-..�..� it _ — '!t jg•L1r F r--�: ; -�j •+�r dL at /aOTNsiI 'noOLEYiRZ • ' l C 2 CHURCH STREET � r R t��• A. I ,. -_ • n Elr �j _ T3F:9202Q- _ _ :e TR 12C22 W �+�_ ��'`� Cam'-+--� "J- r ..\! 14 C`•_--,_ --= t Lj-- - 4 , �r �`Lutr�,-. -:Ny '•R. 12022 • :.=.__ TR Q j `• .;•• y� :w �^` e 0 e. �72Z F� 1.-`tit- \OUH CITY Or ITE..I: - t PLANNING DI\rn()N E\IiII3IT-�SCA[i ••�•• -ztl 1 RESOLUTION NO. 81-70 ® A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO'4MISSION OF THE ® CITY OF P.ANCHO CUCXMONGA. CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11663 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11663, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Marlborough Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the Cite of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a subdivision for a total development of 413 townhouses on 40 acres in the R-2 zone, located on the east side of-ircTiiba7d, on the south side of Church, west side of Ramona - APN 1077-133-03, and 1077-63' 03 into 137 lots, regularly car before the Planning Commission for public hearing an an June 10, 19,31 , and WHEREAS, the City Planner has re=mmended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11663 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed genera.: and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements cf the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and Specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habittt; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative Tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. � t (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11663, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the fo;low4 ng conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1 . Site and Landscape Plans shall be revises t provide an adequate landscape buffer along the westerly boundaries of the project adjacent to existing School and apartment complex. Such revisions shall be subject to approval by both the City Planner and the Foothill Fire District, prior to final map recordation. 2. A ccntinuous :-)oped pedestrian walkway shall be provided along all inte:`nr boundaries of the project. 3. A minimum of six (6) permanent children play areas shall be incorporated into the design of the project. Three (3) of the areas shall be active areas with play equipment. Precise location of such facilities shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior to final map recrrdation. 4. The temporary retention tisin/play area shall ; with a 5' high wrought iron fencing, andits be fences periphery shall bp heavily landscaped. A lawn or other appropriate ground cover shall be installed and maintained within the fenced area. 5. The design and intensity of architectural detailing of all structures and patio walls shall be in substantial compliance with submitted elevations. 6. CUR' S for this project shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior to recordation. Ciear indication of five lanes shall be included. 7. All units along the southern most property line shali not exceed one-story in height. 8. Directories, identifying location of units and buildings shall be provided at key positions within the development. Ei:GINEEP.IdG DIVISION 9• + Soils and geological study regarding the effect of ground saturation due to the storm retention basin on the foundation of the existing adjacent house and any suggested mitigating measures shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review ?nd approval prior to recordation of the map. J - 1 10. An on-sitr! and off-site drainage study for the project shall be provided to the City Engineer for review prior to recordation of the map. After review of the study, the City Engineer reserves the right to determine requirements of construction, reconstruction or aiteration of cn-site storm drainage system to his satisfaction. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS IOTH DAY OF JUNE, 1981 . PLANNING CWMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl , Chairma ;:!LT EST: Secretary or the Planning Commission I , JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that `he foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and ampted by the Planning Commission of ® the City of Ranch-) Cucamonga, at a :-eguiar meeting of the Planning Commission held on the loth day of June, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COi•MISSIO;IERS: Sceranka, Rempei , King, Tolstoy, Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: CO„MISSIGNERS: None �. w ✓ i 4 q O ~C � O J C C y r L � � u✓ _ 4 lC L 7C � 0 9 ly V•a � 4— u A � � 4 .O• ` O J C _ L • _ 4 9— N j C — n r O d 9 n r E• —t Y C 4.n V •' .O� E 6 J L .... ,JO• M C p a O G J 9— C � — 4 C ` T r �L 6 � N C O r.L � V � F J � y wG N — j d .n •�d 9 C L T T C.� y V 9 O Al r� _ 9 .n — AAy C a0 �r 0✓ •`. ) l O.\V OJO�C nb _ cw+ � d L � o.� .• c c � N - __ p — O 4 V C u �� b q 9 V y ` T L c• +. V O �q )- C •••= C u �_ � V40 = wL VUL `d b ` C LV srV� CS C b � .^ V A9 �V — E •.= u.J _m� aJ N f � P OL N•nW JVNC96 V— r✓r ) NL-� p NO 6 9 •'• l ._•• i= ` N L — J r�L.. i •.. V C Z q q O L u u F C y j V u t 4 n 9 Jl o O. OA c v Oy uC >✓ .OJ O =i. l� - y= c V LL — G Ur �uL .V..•s J V C C � C �� C u✓•i O O V� •? d V —N r L.0. O C C � Y T J 'V G• Cyr L - TL_ .� CO .... L^ CC �JA c M r ) u� ... � '•� �•. ocrr -e N.`. ^ c-✓• _,.�`, bs oY _ N G? Vw •JV � � A r.`.r CrVpOV �u q` V VdC �� NOCO i C" CC V✓ ``yI� �— r' V i• � ✓ q 4 V >_9 U_ O A 9 n r—p �� y E V J ✓ � C G ^ G C ; Z] 9d L JL 'TCb2 A b0 O � w �� c_ n N Or` F 9 O •ny V 9u J �. `. � G` ' G .`.4•ka LA P Cr NL Q9 NO N 6w V.� ` C r W9 � L�' N ` 7 r� •^ .e Nr rp � p 0 P _rGV VJ�q > 60 I 1 N N 4 NI N N . 1SL � 1 m M2 ` ' ll u� =1 L n - O w - �• _ N V •� N C L .•rT � ) uw✓ J✓ 4� = M O- `I • S 1 {�9! a V 9y 6N q= .`.ram �N 'O'•� .n` C V+� =� � C Q 1V_N O NO�j� C Oa r6,1 Pu t v VGA w � a =.r �w CY O - Nr �V•T. G✓ i �r Y � ✓ P O r 9 AL` ••� a V A 4 O J a O .OaV �L Y. VO '] � t<.� Ouv > sn10 i y A 4 Y O L n V.• C w C u—.r A ` O p „ L`.- r N r G=z 4 ON V O 1 VV' II �.O• '�O-C`' — l .V]^ � •n C d ✓ O L {q. .r O D t O � c p O � 1i � O O � —C N— .. nq `i — pnL q= � �� +—r OT ✓.V.. �a c 1 .� ` a + `RI � N —� ' C .J'.� q= sn .Ln. `= � ' >• �� ` d �O wO� � A �� ` N I � � c� =N v [ 9.= : c cr r.^ -c3 Goo k o E uo `s' •^,. cr a _�j1�, '- � �y n M '-,`, • GN ::a > u� Y - . - Y c � o � q t_ 1`/i �I i .' 13 4— N l ' r ..— r ` u�� r O✓ V y O� 4 O�—� �,(1yi 1i ` � o � •�y� =.= c `.� Po L � c= � O'oo -Y =`•� c o` = ` �N ZZ��I � V C S rfn CC V � r O± .076 99� qO ^V l � : PA .. s N O 6 .[u✓ C ) .n O '• d w C V a 9 � O )u � �O 41 • — L �. < 4 J t Q w w C w F L Y r V =s. d •a c O O l ^ i > o u 1"• •+ C �r.. r O r V r 00 O C C 6 C� _C �L _ _ r l •J .n r ... J l �� > q r Y n r >`[ L C r• � O .v 9 G, M O r P= L V L L u -_ j ^ T✓1 - -L. c y� + " e � � .' _ '� P•J `imp— � 'r e' .� ca j uV• .Li 9 p _+ L -• J ) y .Vr V V C a L j C` V 9? O Cc v > .' p •'. o rc+ C4 4 ` .- w '-v .o. o � o � � �—a 4P� L ova G 4iW LC� aq ya •r �jjl .V..E r= oL .� -J .L..0 NLUC6� er+ �•o ..Lu Yv .,�> � i. v � e`� .'. .ere �1 L y � eY, ...y.. b .,+ LCi -L' •.J[+ � Pn l� Y •+ b V 1 .,� ISM V p _aN »pL>. 6 � L..Vs � Li ` L a O..• LT L p T o u ) c O a"• + � � �V E W=i t -O. 9 L G � vO�+ Q �r 0 r?L 9O+ ,O`- > .n a C-, 9 '•� bCL .r ♦ III 4 V VGA= .- yV CO IJ VC' V u OLC _ _ � V_ VC" Q Lr ! .... •a )•/• CNu�w V 9Lr 2C £� PAL CPP > 9 d _U- O Yy =ram j �V V9 N V n a0'Vpn == C 2 I n V u C C- a •n V C.> .n N r U q O' O.i + L r C 9 O > o—a Ew Ymr°�. >•�_' cc_ w? s jC ++ `\ I �s� os' v r• oadrn ` n °ecr•.J� L o.. •/ULi.`y )> - O b n > L T L V 9 _~ 4 L C �=J V T u V r j .>r. < .yn 6S0 46m �9 '� C6 Gw < O LL � 1p LV C� ` yr> p ql rlu r49 NO L�w-V j�d. •wp 6 a W - iu O `L rOrn 6 O p •N • ��. � 900 C L S G y� q •r V � � - L V O L C N= 7 V P U 0 T om+ E� ar Pw y VC OL .ri�' =_ o •V..r v a ,w OLEz:; LnJ •Li•9 r O•! - r � O L U L� ~ LV Lr CCT .O.rE O.Nr LL COS Cy > 92r �V4LaV •f V p_ '• C y O C p L V 9 V L L r C O O• •t..r U L q V O O r n N VL O. NV gg4A VP .n �6 O .- P� v-JL r � rN rC 2 « O VV rC �••'qN C ..Vo `O q LpVf`=iLSV Ey= =d r 9 •Vi O u rM l~r C� lCyOw� wy� V i MOO .n` T` V L t .L• >• 9 V `r.0.<, t z urn a Cu ( N UO N L O p CO a .n C+70 `aV O• L� Qp \L wJ V LJ O C... q L lC wrrV rV 9C Vp .na UN C Jpq jrL rV_ __ L n P i l r�-'.-Cr ^ C OOr ' OC ^ ` O •n • f r.diVO PCO JL rQ4 V.>r• �i Gy V +n r .iE � O.�n� t ' � r0 u9 Ciya r+ w• +.r C •w _6 rE a .Lid.Li G O r 6 C .w V L w'a n a.. i r U L u O .J u O V P e,V l 2 E EV O � rV� O• f+ YO _.J OL � C VL a�� O gV»OV CVV OV 90 a ,Po oc '.• q.o. uT r` o� O -+ 9a. T Oa •w O uwJ � CCU Vr VCy O .y v� a s ' n o r �'� da ^ o� eru• nb = c ypT 'e 'ov vd i i wL. 9_L L cL.n `-u P� '" > � •' —u .`v� .o.. c+ p M 6i V rJ 9 V q vL LUO � d Lq arUCO OCj OG� 9C .22 O,r O p t•J.'f q V 9 C L• .L. > � G o .. Lr .c, 4 0 0 � L LL 4c c •. -L• d „9 ." cb 2 M9 i .. a n wr ELM V .- • -j _ M4 �L ••r+�` 4 L -J L1+1 - _P 'C V r � u 2 P V •• O C r .0.. -J` v�r V > 9 Vpr ` , >• a r P w > G C S � L �" �L�.]r� u. I ' O q V � •' V p r� C L C • V O r pt C •. L + -f U V Y G C J O L 'T P i • r. P•q ' d q >J a G w. L V c .•. Pf0 4 v P VV� Vr .n 94 G� Vrn2 ' V -V • q . =LC� 1C± -6 Vr CV �_ N V _ G'J'i ...< .n.i j L C+ L _ C N V •.! •.V L C •w L < O•.. 6 4. � � i� 'g�0• VO 6G uVVGwr�a N9Vw E9 +r VgLL p � V r' r 4 _ V 9T a V r_ V V P ✓ V- G u 2 .'n C L r 7 N C J3G .- V � ^ �uy - ' O 2_r� C.O.w C� Na M .- � � ✓ \� 1 � ` O I n✓ W Ned " _' qoL c«.� cc`-, rL.. oL�-'� u -o a=:. � S ` T •`� �.. v I - c c c`^v ° o .. Y c -.Lo ca -L_- u L :,�,; -+ Poc.' x ✓" � �� I _ _ - _ u-Jr ', V✓ 2 4L� WbP J-C.- A � c cr �,O L E cau P C .a •n- J L L c � V •J �.- .. d; V _ O P p� 6 ` P q V C P G V m ♦+ N O. 9 O ? ... 2 k L 9 C L L n>! I ^ L O q Q L O 2 :�' a t vr IN GG + _ +a0 C✓L `•s✓ E .n 99 dqC ., u y q r N - o c c o r c-o i b p o c •+ o o; P O _" r f L n L'ma �G' q✓ LL•�Cc r �� da cy `. q cP^d « n. _I L_ -�^' r O V✓ _VM J "T.-� O O �w L- O,/`] t O ' G.Oy V V N•_ w �Y t V _ V �.j�� -O ^ON ��r J r� 0 '� ` � GOOq �9.=. O,V- 4 O L vc � O Nan -✓. 9_ CG .Oi9 TC rqL q Or G ararC Wq.... SN 4�lNV V y 9 > r n CO YO C r V Y N cn V V M ` 0 0 � � Z c 'N^O C O . ] � C n O u. " 1✓ � G ' O - Ur0-2= 0 _ Cyr 72 V C ' V ObN > SO GCS ~^ C C q L U q _ C y C N Z - V O q 0 .0.. 9� v' Cn7 VIE YOGC N.VnyV w G L TE V_y 4r 4„.JV Odr i � yVWV _ ✓ L C rV `Ja q L��at' y V_ _ F ✓ q - F` V N - tr J._ y j O'M _ .. -It P z .n y0 .9.oc - O- dyGW 7^r aL p-+ V�WG'N S y O V �� L✓ Lc `occ -� V G � .Q c__• s P �." `o� vG �r O� G9_ .L.. F '� q O7_ pr.V 7lC gNC1rQ pf` P ` aN V V_ >� _�2 4 O _6 c w L 9 _ G N G q✓= > y �'O �'- tY - VPO C9 G.rL O�rO v V� y4_ C V� OVY =� 0+ V V= VO 2 W� �'• O _O Jl y j^`a NP O O qaC V �C nL =9 O JG..rOV N - V- Q^ 7 9� Or ^ 9 «tea GN ` Va bP9a �' O � b - d '^b - P C rOq WV 6C LW O T VV �7_CO CV urV=U qJL.. Oy -� i_•- - � S � L O_ ✓ E-�c�."i O.Y. > _ LCl ✓.. Nm y � p C=i = Yw o�J c�= c a .N. 5E C w L -• VN_ G9- GO P CCnN _`E nrq _ q o - E ucw LLs^.✓ �.v � pcc G` 2� 'a co. Doa".-G G _�JS- OC ZrwCnv C: l-L Girt V� V L�r O-�U Odd « a 9 - rO _ N ` � o- ` T. ='jr 9� l O� -Gi- C OC rCV r 9i � �` V Lcwrr Lr OV N .-1 4LG U Or P _✓ L •J ULr ~ 4 +W .�-LsY�09 LGV6 V GEL' q O :/_ O = O �= F rC C•^W L J- lrp qP J _ Y _ __ u�L r 90 W 14 I I ! 51, ' �� - y I O J C C p C V ,r r• N I - -. � o � _ p c 1 q �— a — xl V V e= 0 C b U c r n 0 7 O C .w C^ a ` 9 e '. S O u � `•\` O u '� Y � ~ e r r - Yc 4 � V4G = j S7 j✓ 9 �� I VJ b� 7� ,e �y � �W _ O Y ^ V y r •1 O O r V ,[O. >Y C c W � � >/1 'V^-p' = V _ r G � � w 6 O_ � J V v •-.S C' r_ 'J w � O.O .n >r�� O.du '...W W i C •� � L � d . �J�V � P � V n O 7 's E C+ � l .. L C Oly .O.r u - V 9 s — J TG a T v �N = •� : -- o i ..1p j j a ^YIYt yc .. L L o ". p 7 L V - �> - O G O j - P 3 L NIa \O I� _ V,•' O.� fJ q u. C O d_q � C V� yG DWI ' ��+ � �r _ 110 _' t ��Ty..'� r > p• VC L= Q G C G r C r - - T � J L r ^y C Y C r ,- S C _M V_ C q � C L L4••n = � id =v � b oI Z-_ L or:o c ec .'. J� � .o.• u 'C' •�. u _ aoi �l N3 u� ut q v� '- •^q a '� C +I L C V > C I L L P� � (ti Y r r_ _ C u L vc .^ V= J u L ` q n N (�• p_ iJ �V 9 �Q O ff • �J - -�•y(`� `� y� q y = P W 3 j N -1 ..• y V � V =O G a y E 9 u ` v` n . �- �r w\ _ o .... V �_ v O Y J C w 1 F � '=J1 r �•� L 9C u E a ��N v� � 29 � -J _P rVO C pVC� a :- i p E ` P C u L V b Co y y�rN w NL V�L Lyo p w � q =L .')� ? V ~ OZ _u O lv LL - O. PL 4 P -r N II- ` -•^� �� yr OPT r Y Vu w� V C 1 ( yo > rt o � M` �YL c— 'r Lu �I � I OI LV` p' yr .d•.q> ` u _ ` _ '^_ {{ wI o_ .. o z` � I I L• r am$ a c o L a �m J` 7 ; 1 1 46 ].r •'f O S.r p b =A y L y20 2 � . - " Lroa..a oLbu ... L _ q i.. ivo�•Gi O d V Y •n v _ L G y - Gn < . .i 1 ' I �i I I O - .�C_- P q O E N O c L= .. G V L 7-_ 4Y cx ` _ 4s` Y cp c` - co r'z J N on � .. I `q >_ c. :� •'. Q n 'u u.� cL-. cL r+Nro ` I r C O• C u r r V c V G C V OBI 1 I i TpTi� 1 j ( � I L'J v _ v �OJa ^ IO CGr q -+tea b OO9 oV S b S M `cb V d sae 7Z r G•J V< r V a 1 L O I C✓ V `T O C p 4 i G 9 r poi t_ .". -•g e� oar _ v - '4_•� cv. S o r' �' _ r u . 4.. 2 LV OC XE MINI C� C RESOLUTION NO. 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EYTFNSInN FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11663 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension, for the above-described project, pursuant to Section, 1.501.83(b) of Ordinance 28-3 of the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-described Tentative Tract 11663. SECTION 1: Tha Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has m: a the follow findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projectF 3. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to record the Tentative Tract 11663 at this time; C. That strict enfo •cement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. D. Tnat the o anting if said time extension will not be �?etrimerl.al to the public `ealth, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Cona'ission hereby grants a t-aB extension for: Tract ADolicant Final Expiration Date 11663 Marlborough •tune 10, 1985 APPROVED ANO ADOPTED THIS 23rd DAY OF MAY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: _ Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary t c - �3 Resolution No. Page 2 I, Rick Grimez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of May, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I: CITY OF RANCHO CLCAMONGA �vcavrpl STAFF REPORT > Mc 1 s Ilj DATE: May 23, 1984 191 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTAIIVE TRACT 12171 - STEPHENSON - A custom lot subdivision six lots on 3.3 acres of 1,nd in the Very Low (VL) District, located at the northwest corner of Klusman Avenue and Whirlaway Street - APN 511- 06-07. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant, Stephenson, is requesting a one-year time extension for Tentative Tract 12171 as described above. The project -,:as originally approved by the Planning Commission on May 26, 1982. II. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension and has compared the proposal with the development criteria outlined in the City's newly adopted Development Code. Based upon this review, the project meets the Basic Residential Development standards of the Development Code for the Very Low District except for the minimum net average lot area of 22,500 square feet. This tract's averz,ge lot size is approximately 20,678 square feet. All lots within this tract do meet the minimum iot size requirement of 20,000 square feet. III. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Division recommends a final extension of two years. In .lranting the final extension for the two year period, the Planning Commission is finding under Section 17.02.02OC-7 that subdivisions and developments of property pursuant to a tentative tract map or tentative parcel map which has been approved pursuant to the provisions of earlier ordinance of j the City and which is in conflict with this ordinance may be 11 continued and completed in accord with the provisions of the approval , provided it is completed within tLe time limit in effect the ti of its approval . Resp t ,l submitted, Rick Gomez : City Planner RG:FD:ns t ITEM u COMMISSIONVlk PLANNING ♦• Time Extension 1`1`12171/Stephenson Page 2 Attachments Letter from Applicant Plannin Commission Staff Report May 26, 1982 Planning Commission Minutes Time Extension . . Approval Y . f f 439 LA PALMA AVENUE. SUITE NOTURES 7 BUENA PARK. AL FORNIA 90620 1 OL H { (7141 527-81 12 a `-c -• Planning Division City of Pancho Cucamcnga 9320 Baseline (toad. Suite C P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 May 7, 1984 Reference; Tenative Tract Map No. 12171 Dear Sirs: Please consider this letter a formal request for extention of the expiration date of the referenced Tenative Tract Map for one year, to May 26, 1985. The economic situation duing the past two years, and several other factors have delayed us 'n the completion of the necessary steps to complete the subdivision. We would appreciate it very much if we could have this additional t'me to complete the tract. ® I have enclosed the $62.00 Fxtention Fee, per your corespondence postmarked May 4, 1984. Sincerely, T. G. Stephenson President -v` r L.0 �^Ll . Gr :vCt ' , vriY:J7yWY COYMi7M7TY ^�N"CFtfcn c.c. Gilbert Engineering •'7 D1-PT. M-AY U :, 1984 AM F•j 71&9431111 p i211 j 213,g�5i 6 G - 3 T RESOLUTION NO. 82-52 A RESOLUTION OF )HE PLANNING COMMISSION OF 114E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO::,-A, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12171 WHEREAS, TPritative Tract Map No. 12171, hereinafter "Mar ' submitted by 111omas Stephenson, applicant, for the purpose of subdi- viding the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a custom lot subdivision on 3.3 acres of land in the R-1-20,000 tone, located at the northwest corner of 4lhirlaway Street and Klusman Avenue - APN 1061-511- 06 and 07 into 6 lots, regularly came before the Planning COmmission for public hearing and action on May 26, 1982; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recor-anended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reed and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at t.ae public hearing, NOW. THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does re,olve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to tentative Tract No_ 12171 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable ' interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed gen--rat and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of de- velopment proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision i. not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (t) TKa tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, new of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision,. 1. < Resolution %o. 32-52 Page 2 , ;a) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Decl . ation is issued. SECTION 2: lentative Tract Mao No. 12171, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved sub;;ect to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The required setbacks as shown on the Tentative Tract Mao shall be shown on the recorded Final Tract Map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY, 1982_ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeff ey/Kyng, Qha -,*an i ® Secretary of a Planning Commission '- I fI, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucar.-nga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly dnd regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Ranc o Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning j Commission held on the 26th day of May, 1982, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel , Stout, King, Sceranka, Tolstoy NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None as 10- 5 1 r ' o Y — 6 ^!L 9 d u L ✓ O 6 9_ ` T.9 "u L _�7 C V J n O- N� OT O n � � d�W „ O � LC l r V OOC• w.� C._ 2C JL � Nf � � U aJt•� i 7� ^_ jq Y ✓� VL � �+'7'O E ' M 711 , 9 n Wfu:s`un i� ..> -•iDn - d F N 4 V q « M� LP L C - NFL _ IVnq L` dVE J c a r Y J J N C2,E ..c L..a vO _ V i - l V O •�W N U G N O N Q M W C 4� r r P� �� .a 9 O �J L r �+ «r a d d O V L^ C r•�u?W N ^ L2 C O C 6 C q i N C O W O V V C ¢ C u N L � � _ u 9 ^ C C � q q� � L C q C E 4 r G L r LUL N q L'v P FV V L-"-. rC-Z PO Vn •Lov „ o — O W YV OY �V � q COL d 4W_ NL OO a « �Y. O = qr a Q Lc « c pa e� Y.00 rv� �v.�.T.. rp. z o c y a M M i O c .v r c= _v `.. - `' G q T .2c V t N V V y Y G 7 q C O Cf t-S O I I G i Vr 7' rY _M Gu � Ly C 4� C u W t O a t r r q O My VR Lu F V T „c c ..q } �l v W u Y « a oY _ :to ` o ad. LL•_-^ aG y n>' ¢ ' c n� O Y V r 4� riaN L •OL �.= qPT L<_ C ` r _ _V C- C1� L--.� C CO OP _ �.r ACC LV NnO On d OVO uY C Oq �+ a oho V C Y `qC jC� Lr'tu dT « ON C l ' n � u OrC V V 4 IF, ��r �r � Oti0 YS O � ni GTu Cry _ � � t q O L V y J V y� «� - �C V y' L V N V S nL E S qC = =O � C •crr r6 W >w 6� q� y L.0 �` Cr C � Tr �� uOl 14 L L _rl_� N C G W I I N p i As o i L N V D C C_i - q 4 O O i ...•j V V O N+ q ' N Y_�I C 9 s 4 � r -•„ r _ O N L .Lt. - G 4 _^..AC ` .tLJ- Caw �iw = C � � ' p � O •�N Vy Q � _C�L� Y O O•T� �, P �f9- � IC ^r Oru VN V4 1 C V N .O•�-'9 "J l y�i�9� „+ all •"4 �i 9 �... _yL ry r L N o.4. N 4 9ry o- 4n� r9 cCV x v c � •c � c L a 4 2 0 o c � �� - o d L c J °� i i_ d ^ u O q G N y e p N d 6 G P 9 O r L IUD O G N 4 C C'V O V T _'.r-. 0 C Lrq TL i0 ` O rL7V O _rDdPML '`o e p i•O � V•�' _a ni c4 ` ' c� i , � �, i �- -.N.=q.D.. 4 J P n > d F .__ G 9 9 M + _ I V n •..r > O L O r L„ 9 •L 6 C � CG _ C_' 4 J i.�� 9 rr E G I 9C �• 6 q ` ON - D N 1-c_ r J y0 ` V V ; N L •I 10 �Q 5E r n N ? fL. c4 � Ns� = au •_ N 4 4 _ ..� � �„ v a TL LNrL` n 4yr � io� "`^o �s L. � D A 'y^ ' `io+� oL:' c v � lI� :- o` No u {�p „`•o -•�� O 99L 4 jr Tr C J ^ - UPY `= L L 9 Jp ( y UC•-L 1= eO V L` L _ _ _U O V 9 4 P M OV C O U i J d C U V N 6 r r r u C i C g r p M C+ O L LC9 „LG C _ = q 79_ Ep P j 92N q+ c+� �I y o�c cE` i.e i'-c nL-_• Jc _ � .. '- €Gp Nq �: d C� O 1 Vu oN.Oi n Id4c P E o�'�04�� e =NCu Ld.c }'•' � q_ 4 : '• i � i9 � � Nuu aVe n c D .L. aim - - N - Cn0 rri rl =4 O QO ^ yam r �q V J C+ d O NO pL`.rJ j_-NCn .FJ � u N o G + P P =4 LL..C i O.S U O 9 _N • �c C 4 N i u 9 0 C D C I N O V5 n L C 6 4 G L 0 9 r J PLO }l+ r CL y + q OL6 Nq _ i V NG+ O L6r DOJ -• Oq L ^ C'_ lCr _ OLD M CCU NO G O� �Or 04 Y9 CNQ - L V N N.n 6 N r - `.CJ• - > S+_ .J L G y q V d y0 GCS r � L O d0_ CN _ _ NGV VIL v � - i9 G Nd rCU � C -• >n.V q'-6 Ar0 � P rLi PG LS D�-O.r� � ]�9 �r>iu � -:] r0 VNL r^ E-O 9� •� NU_°•1 � t L LVNq= > OLV >V= Od V q9 O .YU _a• Ldr �._ Q9.0.•L VC _ 0p0� � _dL9lNN _L � J2 MG � 1C6y> v7� rr'1 _ 9PV Can pr rrr Pu av d_ m a e s o •V ao a+Y EPa� rn� y oa w = iv= a.i:•" `_'_ IS O rr i ••N N .u C d P N_ < 4 4 C�D 4 _G ^EJ VJ v -4 CODE yG 6�_E `•G Ld _o q 'rV PL�DrN �r� L E G V 2S _ N V r V V q ^ >� 9 V 04 1 q V C C O C •OfT V L�r C V L O V P N q C N G • i p y 9 ZZ 7 P PO V r N �7Z' dT qN O OVCC4 ryr• 9.O.r 90 D 9L A N LVJ O 949-� L A O � x q rr 21 P6� PO C6N Gi _9r 9 EL Vr_L E t 01 9 - 07L ELS99r - L G _ � j l A O G •Dr G r O 7 G 0�6 i L �r J q .J N 9 l C � G L - _ E O � G -• J 9 D P_ L V G r N 4 V`O L N O L >r O+r „ O + 6 :aN-=:sz uGn e� ' -• - d�D� � > _ -' 4Ni C V V_„ NV 1:i rOC_ N � w > V AV D .O.r ON D_O �r094C0_ Cd= G =P U = �n CG ^ N •4i.� A OV _ d uN _ .rrdo .'.o Lr 9 A Ergo rvN Lf q Cr9-.r w } rr4 wV 60 C 6 `rr 4.UuC 9 „O Nr0 C� _D C.r9_rC O �Oi• V O r l2a2Dr� 2 >r V r V 7 O x0 C 9 C C 9 -•r' S C 4 l'A q O n C M L D 0 4=-- V` N Y r r > dd sPUG _G PPy Jw- C� E 9 >• LN Vg4 �9 V_ ` LV r0 `eo r c o c o � u�r d_N 7°+c Nos "po-• c 9e •�ev ccN o� ci `- >•- o vl <L .J4 Y Prro N ems: ¢wv. co < an LL -. c 4 >, � °° C I N G G A C L O p 4` y; N r r _�r N ✓ - y P . < ViO D P ✓ V P_ L= 4 �DC OQ gyMPn _. N _� Lr.r pi 4P ✓.V. T nMJ rC uCL P u � VO r L u V O V N L w• i Nhi � P O r l n )O. q r r �• Ld A < d _ _� 4UO O_ O �� JG L V , 1 j � Pr — G �u0 _u0 T:✓ �_✓ P9 9y L � p ' = ~ b V^ L L S a N � O .^ j 4 G r g 4 — •� C _ I I L V C` l F. ..<.D 9 ` C i yi N u P O G y t ' i .✓r. r r G E d d C G 7 O V rn l r N r W L T ✓ — VG� 9 � L 4�L � Vim LL. yC `� 6L LNL .i OBE i UG O ._ N YNn V [I v L A �sO � ; P ) Lu O 4 .LnN O.v ✓ ).�r � u —_ CO-9 J Cr N L� q.r a n d V C —m L C Cd l✓ L d p O O = .Y r ✓ L — y C L CO.V d—C pL ry Z'. MC q — O r —pu pIq V - 9 C V L VW' ✓ ri ✓ N TL V Q F nF= `✓V C V O L— O Y W C UI O S C C C d 9 G� w�LJ J L 7 'LpJ� e p ` _^ O A w 0 •d r .C.o 21 Q— N O✓ �I L A 0 0 o L q 9c c TyN Vcr O L Y. L O VC ✓ CL..I uru qG LG ✓ 7G. _ `^O LLL __ d44 L y > L > LN� �O d.r DbV `qu _ NIL dyY o_w�= C O GC d AL4.� = 06V c_ P d •r a O .--y 0 L L u✓ y Y d <9 G— L6 YqC � a=` uL— � LanOL .OrVC rtrrN PL W LN OOO = b L09-^q ^� -= L,. M � •^ c aor ��0✓ 2 d o yc Vd o = c —«y` 6 i ^C� a O<✓ GO dp�r _ N � OV'L'nEb W! E „ q LNq q A L— y � A < `L O✓ PUG .Oi. DUL du✓ Cdc�_ L„,—O r< t NrO.?W v V bV d , C Y N9L `q N` LA 9✓ �6J ✓ VOy Ai4uA CGL LAOV �r W C _ 4 ._ 1 _ L C9D S o. IT Q q 9 q y C � G L �0 < L O A S T V C d L A Y• M _ — >. � I4 V O V A A _V �✓ _P V O 6 � d O✓Q � N� L_ P; E O P g G t]� V V N A 9rAV Nr uN .r—_ V ✓ Or 6 OO✓L✓ n lr q+ QN04 Mb V > uN LTO _— _ P9 V7Jj J 9I Vq ` 4 1 L r 1pq ^s �LE V N.. Y I G o O w t♦ C q K O✓ CI .r .v Mf N 2 d _r Lac � n N� a _Aa `a.✓ .`..$✓ � o �_ o .r C ' y 9C_ tJ VON V >L �..✓ .-. C C `C � — 4 —= N✓ O_ ✓r — E O V� N C q C 9 L L Y. L �6 N O O 2m , � 1-• Gw`rZ= � CN� W r= � c �r yrd GOr _C �.GLN 6N ✓ Oar Lr0 r VI.. V _.+—✓ i PM ]�. LC 4.g om .= �WL rn� o o__ o.� ci, o� " - G�ar> Aa:a•L•Vd _GO �j � Ar yuu G .e4 cA — � Ao L V L—N= + ✓ tt N o <�- mJl d.+ w.>^�W -c N �_ __ <✓ �= :gL�gg ay bS� = _. � o :P c - o qO ✓ O. =aOq 3 =_ A W= Oc N LEd ` < < = nr Lc `O n� = N t o ✓ o - o d c G V W L L 2 N o ✓N� o v O 9 i✓ • 'E a ^ '� -Wv d 9 -y ✓ c oN Z9 9 e i y C. O ✓—�_ ._ d` 4��L `9— F 6 —r q > J 9 9 y J`^ L N L lr N L G V C •� L O O r O P C C6 u 4^N n v T O PO fl J GC C 9PE � gLyy 19 0. ^ 92 uO_« O >GuO � MC Y_ 9_ N� Lr1 q GNL V pC ilr ]� Z V ` J— yJ N _ O NCO Cv rCpa=V qJS � � ^I b G� j] Or NV <— V � V y r C y q L O i 6 O E r— 'J C L P✓`✓ y A N L E C N 9 N P u n L n O M 0 >. O L' P ✓F r Er _ � e er� 4 L e` MC• —� c —c L0T✓L. DAq W N zg F ` 4e -- za L. _ A c m u o A N A o% i n y d: D- y a:LV L�<._Or> �I 59V L VE O✓_�O� OOLE D d L_ 2 it �C C G�—o N N n A O L A O_ i. .� �_ 1- ✓q_ n G 9 F�� L� •• 4 V �+ N O G L OL < � V L P A L 9 r r r r 9 > L 2 V > O V w A _ G c � O r y N N ✓ L <L C �r Pl A C 2 >r_ O q N M l V r_r y✓r 4 L 9 q •� J q q _ N r N V L > VLLS V9��L aCO= N 'hV OC L ✓� AOr T6 u — t' �L�'r < =w :7L OLd— T o Nco�.IY.1N 5,i' J c ` o L— L�_o F� L��F— •^ oVt LI Gc' _ yE�I �2� � 4 L _ 0= 4r4 044— V C �` _ PN N N Nays rV L OA 2r it �a VL �r —N � � <�—•r t n= ` V L r o < r ter.- v.c. c >o D� p9v4J.J N C ¢ oo V ` . C q • 1 J �_� ! lei � ! ,;,i ! + ! 4 J 1 NI tl s l O I J C`N -• o o _r,�. �. q I `= d .-. .: L � o q J.I I I 4 d '^� � 7 a r_� 7 ✓ VrF vC = i ^ OC Su VS 02L LL �9 � �I � LV c.d+ VC _ 9 C � V ` VVO - q « �✓ VL OL SwL CO y Y AW v Cp rn�. i_ b � '�V Ot qC Cuu � ZI �r �- �r C• Vq �. F V .J... Ob O 4q Off+ dl err bN ✓ L I'/'' d q z _N > P n D « C CV n wl« O qP aN ug CL y r` It « 9 44 � O L - � N Mu Nq u� OHO- t0.. L•� ` � `V? �� >� �� TL "_ �I� � � n �- 2- `"T' ^ -_ Ti qG CNdN O LG u nP_> Arl Gb WC d > C r �^ dC CJ` L Ci A y I �� O CUV �d-• V CV I« � � iiyN 00 q� _-P dJ LN `tLi I ^ q Y J C ^ d i-• _u I �' I I I « TP u � Y « a I • V C^ .qn L `4 Lo ca « d•p C � �nT � /, 3J�` • i � VL� dr O I LdL -C^ tV Or - •^ >' 9 V 6 " L A b u q L r K-LLL «rrL d„ q> J - S�� _ _� �D 4 �L I I V r� 9 N O •v T ti y L� _ C 4 O C L^ ` O r JJ CrC^ > ` � �< I I I a i -_tl CL Vu • A_� S GC rO CJ OW 5. 2 � « C Pd Gl C � LN N ��^n C � Vq G4C O SVC L uu lP9 C n Y « o' E C r « «L4 c «C = 4 Lu - D• G I O «j L A^ C O CL L 4LV r ' C E oq- 4- to 06 �<- �__ I I i L s_ -> L .L+ v ¢. O c eC•L E P. «cur ^O O C C V O L `u� 1OL it -O_ y coi _C « «_ I' L rr L� « c .-l. C= 2- G V2 «` y LC � o is of oJi E� r Gq GO WS LI VVr 6L iJr � WI �� .�i I C LMV NL� 6� Nrr_« �._ ?C rrGi6 Boll , 0 L C Li0 i G d C _ O r .. Iie � O O > 9 4 C O N L •^ �• ` c N C r y. C •�L •� w rj eC 0.- qLs 0 ^ cpy _qu N I� oc¢= t.� �= u=o roi- a O �•J"r c •ivy`. c � � �� i _Gw ry �'= � � G' ��6c ocT o� a �r•. io c ._... �: u � `�� =9 �.-c w TOr SI FO •a C 4 V C C 9 O l 9 L O 1 O C C G r CJ Y '� a ry L _ G .r..l � V V C>v+0 � 6 a. `i r E i - c C'` � E •� >.�c .� a ac`c`• e v :.ci• �. �m � a v` cf-'. N -0 '0 c_ o- u > , r C L' N r n r _ C S' L V. O G C 9 V tr G i i 11 C O A ro O L` O C r _ C T C_O ♦� �. c- Q 10 .0 Jo i t Cu-missioner Rcmpel voted No for the previously stated reasons. S: 10 p.m. The Planning Commission Recessed 8:25 p.r... The Planning Commission Reconvenes * * * * .. C. ENVT.RO%�22%7AL ASSESSML•= A":D TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12171 - STEPHENSON A custom lot subdivision of 6 lots on 3.3 acres of land in the R-1-20,000 zone located at the northwest corner of Klu�rian Avenue and wnirlawav Street - A_DN 1061-511-06 & 07. Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Commissioner Sceranka asked what the reasoning was for the Equestrian Cc mnittee' s requirement of a 40' easement and the easement on the south side of the property. It appeared to him that the Committee was asking for an additional 15' for this particular project. Mr. Johnston replied that they were not asking for additional area, but that this area was to be a local feeder trail of 15 feet. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, explained that the Committee had reviewed the tentative map and in their review saw that there was the ability to use the drainage easement along the west boundary to coincide as one trail for direct access and the one on the south to provide those people tc the east to come down through those streets to get on the trail and go north up through the Demens area which would allow them to connect with the Regional Trail System. Cos,nissioner Tolstoy stated that when the drainage easement was improved it would most likeiy be concrete lined and this did net seem to be an ideal situation to have people get in a concrete lined ditch to use it as a trail. He asked Mr. Rougeau if it should be designated that the trail not be within the cemented ditch. Mr. Rougeau stated that with the improvement of the Demens f:hannel the amount of water going down that easement would be a great deal less and that the improvement would more than likely not be a concrete ditch :;ut a V-gutter no more than ten feet total. Ccamissioner Tolstoy stated that he was all for equestrian easements, however, felt that this one needed to have a little more thought put into it so that it not be in conflict with the drainage of water. He further stated that there was a problem with the trail proposed for the south side of the proiect in that there was a 14 foot gap in the street grade. Chairman king opened the public hearing. PlanningAWNL Commission *trout e' -9- ,+ May 26, 1982 Bob Gilbert, engineer fior the project, addressed the Commission stating that lie was _n agreement with Commissioner Tolstoy's comment concerning the rra21 ' thc .� south_ He felt that it would be almost impossible to grade that area so that a horse could get from the bottom to the existing trail system. 'Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, stated that one of the Conditions of Approval stated that a detailed equestrian system be submitted prior to recordation of the map and these problems could be worked out at that time and the solution would be brought back to the Commission for their review. Paul Roueau, Series Civil Engineer, reviewed the additional Condition to be imposed on the tract that the Commission received just prior to the meeting. Bob Gilbert stated that he understood the drainage problem, however, wished to have the condition worded so that it would be open enough to allow the engineers and staff to work on a solution to the drainage problem. Tom Stephenson, developer of the project, addressed the Commission and stated that he has wondered if Lewis Home3 could be required to go back and redo the street as they caused the problem in the first place with the 14 foot cut and if he could sue the Count;: for this situation. Ted Hopson, City Attorney, stated that in answer to the first question, no. In .response to the second question, the answer is probably yes since that municipality had concentrated runoff onto the Applicant's property. There were no further public comments and the public hearing was closed_ Motion: *loved by Rempe 1, seconded by Stout, carried unanimousl; , to adopt the Resolution approving Tentative Tract Map 12171 with a change in Condition M-8 to be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REVEL, STObT, KING, SCEPUACNYA, TOLSTOY NOES: CWMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CO:MISSiONERS: NONE 1I. E%VI!2:::'T-NTgL ASSESS`G:Z AND PARCEL �tv NO. 7349 - LEUIS DEVELOPMENT CO`�A-Ny - A division. of 20.::5 acres into 8 lots within the General Industrial area, :rotated on the north side of 4th Street, east of I-15 Freeway - V-% 229-233--9. Paul P,ougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the Staff Report. Planning Commission Minutes -10- May 25, 1982 j.Y, 6^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Gi4A•%10. . MEMORANDUM ° tc i DATE: ;•lay 21 , 1982 TO: '52mbers of the Planning Commission iy FROM: Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Addendum to the Standard Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Np_ 12171 The following condition is recommended to be added to Standard Conditions cf Approval for the subject tentative tract. Item M-8 - All storm runoff from Lot 6 shall be intercepted and drained to the easement at west project boundary by means of Catch Basins and pipe, i to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Respectfully submitted,Q SB:bc cc: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer Developer/Applicant Project Engineer i 1 i CITY OF R:INTCHO CUCANIONGA C, 3CG_ttpy MEMORANDUM V - � 1977 DATE: May 26, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commi ion FROM: Rick. Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ADDENDUM NTO STAFF REPORT FOR TENTATIV7 TRACT 12171 - STEPHE?VSO BACKGROUND: The Equestrian Advisory Committee has raviewed the above- described project to examine drainage and equestrian easements along the west and south project boundaries. The Committee felt that these trail easements were necessary for a unified trail system throughout Alta Loma. ' RECOMMENDATION: The Equestrian Advisory Committee therefore recommends that the follow- ing condition be added: "That the existing drainage easement . erve as the equestrian easement along the west and south tract boundaries, and that said easement be reflected on the final tract map and final grading and drainage plan." CITY OF RANCHO CI CAMONGA G�cnn1o�, STAFF REPORT ® View' a ;I� x F I 1977 DATE: play 26, 1932 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12171 - S7EPHE_NSON - A custom lot subdivision of 6 lots on 3.1 acres of land in the R-1-20,000 zone located on the northwest corner of Klusman Avenue and Whirlaway Street - APN 105i-511 -06 & 07. BACKGROUND: In early 1930, the Planning Commission and City Council approved a zone change from R-1-1 to R-1-20,000 for this site. In June 1980, Parcel 'lap 5125 was approved on the subject property and will expire on June 11 , 1982. As shown on Exhibit "0", the street design and lot configuration for the Parcel Map is similar to the Tract Map submitted with the exception of Lot 4. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: This application is for a residential custom lot subdivision in the R-1-20,000 zone located north of Hill- side Road between Amethyst and Archibald (Exhibits "A"-"C") . As shown on Exhibit "E" , the project consists of six lots on 3.3 acres . A ten foot median island is planned for the center of the 100 foot wide cul-de-sac proposed. The project site has a fail of 30 feet from north to south with an average slope of approximately 10ro. At the southeast corner of the site, a cut of approximately 14 feet was created when Whirlaway Street and Klusman Avenue were constructed. Vegetation, on the site consists of indigenous shrubs and grasses with no trees. Single family homes on 20,000 square foot lots surround the property on the east, scuth, and west. The property to the north is owned by the Flood Control District. A 40-foot drainage easement runs along the west project boundary. The General Plan designation for the site is Very Low Density (2 or less dwelling units per acre). �-ram Tentative Tract 12171/Stephenson Planning U- nission Agenda . 'lay 26, 1932 Page 2 ANALYSIS: This project has been reviewed by the Design P,eview and Growth "anagement Committees and has passed the Residential !assessment System. The limited access and slope of the property dictated the street design and lot pattern. To meet the 90-foot width requirement in the R-1-20,000rzone, Lots 2 and 3 require 75-foot building setbacks, while Lot 5 requires a 40- foot setback. The 100-foot wide cul-de-sac will provide :cider lots and better circulation. Equestrian easements have not been provided for this tract and the property owner/applicant has stated that the keeping of horses will be prohibited in the CCs2's. None of the surrounding property has existing feeder trails which tie into this property. The Equestrian Advisory Committee will meet to review this project prior to the Planning Commission meeting and staff will present their recommendations to the Commission during the oral review of the Staff Report. As shown on the Grading Plan (Exhibit "F") Lots 1 through 5 will drain to a 10' wide concrete channel located :within the drainage easement along the west project boundary. Concrete V-ditches and appropriate easements are provided for the cross-lot drainage. Lot 5 will drain to the street. Exhibit "S" illustrates the proposed direction of runoff for this project, and Fxhibit "H" illustrates the existing drainage pattern for the area. Drainage to Klusman Avenue will not increase by a significant amount. ' DESIGN ,EJIE!1 10t1.'1ITTE": When reviewinc this project, the Committee was concerned e:ith the number of lots proposed and their shape. Some adjust- ment of lots was made and the Committee felt that the ct:anges provided a better de_ig, The Committee believes that if six lots zre approved, this proposal ren -esents the best possible design. The Ccmmittee found no significant reaso,. to further change the design or number of lots. ENVIR";'1E"1TAL REVIFN: Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the Applicant, is attached for your review. Staff has computed Part II of the Initial Stt;iy and has found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of a Nega- tive Declaration is appropriate. Tentative Tract 12171/Stephenson Planning Commission Agenda May 26, 1932 Page 2 FACTS FOR FINDitiG: The Subdivision 'lap has been prepared in accordance with the Subdivision `tap Act and City Standards and Ordinances. The project is also cc ,.sistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinances . Considering the constraints placed on the property by previous develop- ments, this design can be considered the best possible alternative. CORRESPONDENCE: A Notice of Public Hearing was published in The Daily Report newspaper and 37 notices were sent to surrounding property owners. Also, public hearing notices were posted at and around the property. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this pro- ject. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input and other elements of this pro- ject. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the facts for finding and recommending Conditions of Approval , the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a 'negative Declaration would be in order. RJsoectful4 submitted, r RICK G !IEZ City Planner RG,CJ:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity trap Exhibit "B" - Matura: Features Map Exhibit "C" - Site Utilization Exhibit "D" - Parcel yap 5126 Exhibit "E" - Tentative Tract 'lap '.2171 Exhibit "F" - Conceptual grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Runoff Direction Proposed Exhibit "H" - Existing Drainage Pattern. Part I Initial Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions { D- 17 t Idc�il CA-j-f- L tMrr - ®ij , --- �-► . I � - - - d I I 1 1 a , �1 ti • 1 J L u . (� FORTH CITE' OF ITE.xI: T> /rr �� RAT\LHO CUC .- ' G.-' TITLE: VL sflt�Y tHaa !® PL%,i\7NI.\G DIXISION EXHIBIT --Pk_ SG1LE: E -t"s_ r ♦ / 40 1970 f ' i i NORTH CITY OF • 12xrj RANCHO CUCAMONGA mAmt _ - ,PLANNING D _ i', J `ri I 1 Y ' - � 1 i I ..:::�1 Li:as .�:Nc'J \` - "i J ' j —J '•r—' � � � � � � � I� " 1 /�Q%yam✓ �..?:.i�"1/.'1�..�' _ 1_t ' Ll l I L I ' I I �a YJ ✓:Ar�•c I COd '"•'C,: 7i<f,E'K7� 1 <X«�� 0.4� �/:E I I r—. I L } I I I IrrI I _ c'2 $Z �L. E 1 � � Oar. ;v2 1 _Ty I - ' I i I I NORTH i CITY OF RANCHO CUCA'MO,\ TITLE= E 1 rrl, =emQg PLANNING DIVISION SCALE--H:ffs. TENTATIVE _- 1 .-ARCEL NIAP N7 51it IN THE CITY OF RANG D CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA n?�^:C�t o=�-•.oC_T��ra=-L3=^.'I�,a 22,-c�w...r�.+,o I i 1�'•••' ..-l.t:..L,�G<-%`�.cST�y�,11"��1.aGQD1Ai.0�.�E�Cw1�, 1L'�,:�-C�^.U.ITY...�ryat,1'3E.2L:CR'JtA10tSTdlTcC.'FGJ he DA '....•_� �__�;sc. -lu'],Tu 7�,�o_z.tso� .as„n •JG.=s,v_..00•� U4. •St+prwc•S 6.�1'EOu �.�o.0 - W x1.v,4.(nuc"4u,AaC.T 1 � 1 1 lQT o 'JS�%• — t 9 � I ': 1 � �••T -' �-o=.- - -- �zoo — 7 n HBO LOT I it Wti_121i1.VCV_ Sl,O C I •Q �i �—ST3E��__c�p—�. sa d�ic'^•' �+K�70 EIS w � M YA�J 'llf0-SV,Y Qp,�_jH c"5- NORTH 1 it CITY OF rr=al: -r-> . �. RA\CHO CUCAIN'IO�,CYA TnU: _ SiAe P/m1- 7;," S/Zb PLANNING DIVISION ECHIGIT: P3 SCXLE: N•775. ' 1 L s" s LOT 11' Zrwtw ' �• Inswt%r•_ r, .ri. �. .v � � a 1 I � WWIYUw11Y �Tc RQ V. 1410 �.• r-� YI +c�1 �L� mI I YI I I :n>al '{EMAIT IVE TFMT No 1M IN THE CITY OF RANDU CUCAMONCGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDWO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2EtUGG�teS;OU CF THE�All'R:E�LY??�O�rnT G`G sa'=o::-'-,ou��'+..�^Tlowlnt_gF�nol.a22�vfu.rJa1D /\ 1 A,:." i1.1'.T411Gi7 W6"T� 3ETZw1GttDlll0 rnF1>flN11. /i /�\\V7 illZblfi G:.lfry CFc 12fcRL1ARDINOISTSTE.00C>+]SWRfIW V FORTH CITY OF ITE\t: �(-r�r Iz•-,\ RANCHO CUCA 'VIO�NGA TITLE:-rr izr—�s r►A� PLANNING DIR']SION EXHIBIT--- -r-- -SCALE:_I•'T r z.� y L) t' t,r.ar m aer `' r rw � tvY;1`• Z ...- rry:ar.r an. •t, �r � --- _--- --•1, `��, \\�-1�p� \ �\\� ��/ ' � ` �n �� r]f]f .. n.,...err'• I a I n, e..r-r- �� —i=Y- -\ � '� , •• - _ N4 I ` rll q K(YHO -- ' �'- 'lam—•— •.s,��-`�°� cl f�;S- <" �j � . I Lt J _ � irf"' iN.,..arr n 1�-:(u ret uK� ✓ I Ij •• bIY + I Mu s•r.aR I I oln 1 �I� LGGGtYl t V !P— t,r n� Sft1/Ol/B-B Sfo 1/CN P-O c wNri snr'/ .awN 11 emu no .[M.I l gr.n.r f,• io 1 r . eE::1eN C•C •O +t4/ NORTH CITY OF ,Test: .4-IM Iz-7\ ® RANCHO CUCAivIO\'Grp TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT. F SCALE: >a ES. p - �3 o' • •l! �• `ems � �/•ia Lp yr- o=119' - f�'•�P ao• � I smq m=ever i-a - Ylll/lvll�/MOP 41LA�9-•D9"W I '•04o-. I AREA DKAINING TO KLUSMAl: AVE. e'�111 AREA DRAINING TO EASEMENT TO WEST l� NORM CITY OF ITEM: _V CTT mi-71 RANCHO CLCATMo,\L GA TITLE: IZt>ucrF mmr � � PLANNING DIVISICkN EXHIBIT. C--q SCALE-1a ram" o- 77 I 1 III r� .� — � L � I r few _ :_ I�Really =IOT � ! 1 Ilk I IT i � 1 I I 1 of r i � . I 1 i I i 1 ' NORTH CITY OF iTF�I- � ITTiz17{ RANCHO CUCAN IONGA TITI..E- E;XK iZFi1— rXzf► 146s ,F- j r ep� hj PLANNING IUIVLSF3..%J ExIiI rr: 0 SCALE: Wfs. €J— oZS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR IENTAT. IVE TRACT 12171 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above-described project, pursuant to Section, 1.501.83(b) of Ordinance 28-8, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-described Tentative Tract 12171. SECTION 1: Tne Rancho Cucamonga Plannino Commission has made the following Findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects. S. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to record the Tentative Tract 12171 at this time; C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or mater`ally injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Tract Applicant Expiration, 12171 Stephenson May 23, 1986 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23rd DAY OF MAY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST• Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary Resolution No. Page 2 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cormission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Pianninr Commission held on the 23rd day of May, 1984, by the following rote-to-wit: AYES: COPMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Guc Anro STAFF REPORT Z DATE: May 23, 1984 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-11 - MAC BETH - The development of an 80,332 square foot miri-storage facility on 3.56 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3), located near the southwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 209-031-43. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of a precise site plan and building design and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Puroose: To create an 80,332 square foot mini-storage complex. C. Location: Near the southwest corner of 9th Street and Arch�ba Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 3.56 acres E. Existinq Zoninq: General Industrial (Subarea 3) F. Existinq Land Use: Vacant parcel G. SurrounVn Land Use and ZonincL rt Noh neraI industrial inspiron); zoned General Industrial South - General industrial; zoned General Industrial East - Vacant parcel ; zoned General Industrial West -• General industrial; zoned General Industrial H. General Plan Desi nations: Project Site - Genera In ustrial (Subarea 5) `- North - General Industrial (Subarea 3) South - General Industrial (Subarea 3) East - General Industrial (Subarea 3) West - General Industrial (Subarea 3) ITEM E PLANNING CO,'4MISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review 84-11/Mac Beth May 23, 1984 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The site consists of a vacant parcel which s opes gent .y in a north/south direction. Currently, the site contains a variety of indigenous field grasses and native plant materials. In addition, no structures are located on the site and street improvements are aon-existent. II. ANALYSIS• A. General : Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. Staff completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the project. B. I acts: Development of the project will increase the amount of water runoff from the property in addition to minimaily increasing traffic generation. However, these increases are insignificant since the surrounding streets and drainage facilities will be provided to handle these increases. V. RECOMMENDATION: Based upor, site analysis and the Initial Study, this project will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment. If the Commission concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration for this project would be in order. Respe,c tful ly su'ocaitted, Rick Gomez City �7arr RG:FD:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "8" - Elevations Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Initial Study, Part I 1 el` r� AV s 4A IA L 1 .g y i L _ be �- � E— � AIEA CJ1LWlA20iT (( MM{Y0�0 MIS �R2,1 Y.YeN � b i 6) SITE PLAN �—� Rimmo cucAYiortrA una-5 OWNER GOO STEIN AND M. \OIZTH CITE' Or I I EMI: RA\CHO CL'CJCNIa\ .A TITLE: s i PUNNING DINrISIO\PUNNING EXHIBIT: SC-,LE- LU 0 W '.4o; M 2 lip 1:; J 1i1111;-1 N LU C7 U3 P us w cm LU NORTH CITY Or- RANCHO CUCA�.Nt ,10,NGA TITLE: PLANNING Dj\qSj().N EXHIB , I s�rro. cnvixsys � ' i fey 1 ! ! 912s1 � a 1 i 7 _ -,Y.Y25T.191B NORTH CITY OF ITEM: ® RANCHO CI;;C A IO\G.L TITLE: t! s p► PLANNING DR"L�IOv E.xtjtrrr: Sc,LE: C CITY Or zci-.i4CiiO CUCAMONGA T_NITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - Tc be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87. 00 For all projects reauiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Re:-iew Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: RANCHO CVCAMONGA MINI STORAGE APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: (7F}ni[FL MACRrTIf NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CCNCERNING THIS PROJECT: Daniel MacBeth ( 714 ) 67 80 3024 Ocean Blvd . Corona Del Mar, California 92625 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. ) SOTJTHiEST CORNER OF NINTH STREET AT ARCHIBALD Parcel 1 of Parcel ?an i':o 152c . as oer plat fil of Parcel gaps , Page 56 Records of County of 3andBernardino4 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Building Permit. I-I a t PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: We are proposing a "SELF SERVICE STORACP nA(-T1TTYII rrhirh n ' ll aril o on- rj =O%Qly 3:1! aGpgr, of th ( �!ot ri Pal Arno ) A The L'�r " rTi:3iZR ^G>--S�teiaL 3� S2D •ha yra¢ a-Iy nrtinn of tho pTnpP -t3, — ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA ARID SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: The net acreage to be used b our proposed facility wil be acres . Included in the project wi_i be approximately 'M ,332 square feet of building . DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICPS. OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE GF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : SEE ATTACHED PHOTOGRAPHS . f( i S y L I r r; R ^r Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? NO. .i; I-2 P,_ 7 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground cor_tours? 2. :reate a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. ) ? 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? S. Remove anv existing trees? How many? 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explaaation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the b t of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that itz al information may be required to be submitte a equate evaluation can be made by the Development w ittee. Date !L �� Signature C Title__e-19614--f-d" {�- / c: .vdb }` _� 1-3 r i CITY OF RAuNCHO CUCAMONGA o� 'CAN10� STAFF REPORT IR 1 r Z DATE: May 23, 1984 1977 a.` I TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission <: FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12650 - DEER CREEK - A residential development of 225 single family o- is on 147.1E acres of land in the Very Low district, f' located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of Hillside Flood Channel, and north of Hill ;ide Road - APN 201-121-16. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: a A. Action Requested: Approval of Tentative Tract Map and issuance of Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Development of 225 single family custom lots C. Location: South of Hillside Channel, east of Haven Avenue and t north of Hillside Road. D. Parcel Size: 147.16 acres E. Proposed Density: 1.53 du/ac F. Existing Zoning: Very Low, (1-2 du/ac) G. Existing Land Use: Vacant H. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Creek Channel; Vacant; Very Low Residential South - Single family homes; Very Low Residential ; Flood Control East - Creek Channel ; Vacant; Very Low Residential ; Flood Channel West- - Single family homes; Vacant; Very Low Residential I. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Very Low District, 1-2 du/ac; Equestrian Overlay North - Very Low District, 1-2 du/ac; Flood Control/Utility Corridor South - Very Low District, 1-2 du/ac East - Very Low District, 1-2 du/ac; Flood Control/Utility Corridor West - Very Low District, 1-2 du/ac '? ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12650/Deer Creek May 23, 1984 Page 2 J. Site Characteristics: The subject site is vacant and slopes southward at approximately an 8 percent grade. Vegetation consists of indigenous shr-bs and weeds with minor rock out-croppings. Small groups of olive trees are located at the northern and mid-portions of this parcel . K. Background: This project site is a part of a recorded tract Tract 9534) , which received Planning Commission approval on October 26, 1978, commonly known as the Deer Creek Development. The original development consisted of 293 single family lots with sizes ranging from 3/4 to 1 acre over 293.2 acres of land and had an overall density of one dwelling unit Per acre. At present, the lower portion of the development (Tracts 9582 and 9583) has developed approximately 140 lots of the total 149 in these two tracts. This project site is the remainder of the entire development consisting of 144 lots on 147.16 acres of land. II. ANALYSIS• A. General : The developer, Deer Creek, is requesting approval to resu ivide the remaining 147.16 acres into 225 single family lots with a proposed density of 1.54 dwelling units per acre. The proposed loc sizes rangF from 20,000 square feet to 38,000 square feet. The following table shows the distribution of the number of lots in each lot size categories. Lot S4ze Number of Lots T,UU( sq, ft. — 6 20,001 .22,000 sq. ft. 102 22,001-25,000 sq. ft. 58 25,000 sq. Ft + 49 The average lot size for this project meets the Development Code minimum of 22,500 square feet. This project has beer, submitted as a custom lot/tract subdivision; therefore, precise architectural design and site plans are not required at this time. Any proposed architectural designs and site plan will require Design RcJiew Committee and Planning Commission approval . The requirement to implement the General Plan goals and the Development Code to provide for similar land use, density and quality of house products to the surrounding development is a necessary finding of the Design Review Comm ttee and Planning Commission when reviewing any future architectural designs. s PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12650/Deer Creek May 23, 1984 ` ® Page 3 B. Circulation: Streets "B" and 'IF" of this project provide access to Haven Avenue while Morning Star Drive, Valinda Drive, and Canistel Avenue provide access to the south to Hillside Road. Staff originally was concerned with prov:d',ng a secondary access for the vacant parcel to the east; however, the applicant has provided and prepared a conceptual street pattern for the easterly property which illustrates an acceptable circulation plan (Exhibit "D") and meets the intent of the acces'. policy. Based on staff analysis, approximately 24 percent of the traffic generated by this project will use Canistel Avenue for access to the south to Hiilside Road, while 46 percent may use either Morning Star Drive or Valinda Drive to the south to Hillside Road. Streets "B" and "F" of this project will channel approximately 30 percent of the traffic generated by this development to Haven Avenue, relieving some traffic impact on Hillside Road. Under the existing circulation plan, Hillside Road is designated as a collector and is designed to accommodate this increase in traffic. Therefore, the increase in traffic generated by this project will have negligible ® impact in the project area. C. Design Review Committee: The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to the follcwing conditions: o The site pl:n shall be revised to provide similar lot sizes for lots on the south side of this proliect abutting the existing Deer Creek Development to create a proper transition. o Curvilinear streets shall be provided at the north end of the project site (Streets "A" and "B") . The applicant has incorporated all of the above conditions (Exhibits "D" and "E"). D. Develooment Review Committee: The Co.,writtee reviewed the project and determined that with the recommnended conditions of approval , this project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. The applicant will be required to install all off-site and on-site improvements per City standard plans and specifications, and subject to all conditions of the custom lot subdivision. Conditions of Approval are provided in the attached Resolution for your consideration. PLANNING CGMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12650/Deer Creek May 23, 1984 f Page 4 E. Trails Corrnittee: The Trails Committee has reviewed the e tentative subdivision and made the following recommendations: s.: 1. Provide direct trail connections to the Haven avenue ccmmunity trail . r 2. Provide an additional 8-foot dedication for the community r trail or; Haven Avenue to meet the required 20-foot trail standards. ?< 3. Cross-sections of the c munity trail on Haven Avenue and interior street feeder .rails shall be shown on the plans per trail standards. In addition, a cross-section of the existing equestrian trails on Haven Avenue must be provided for comparison. The applicant has incorporated all cf the recommendations of ". the Traiis Committee (Exhibit "G") . However, final design of the trails and the transition of existing trails to the new trail on Haven Avenue shall be approved by the Trails Committee. F. Grading Committee: The Grading ComrT:ittee reviewed and a?proved the conceptual grading plan subject to all of the conditions of c 5 the custom lot subdivision. Final Fina7 . grading plans are required : to be approved by the Grading Committee prior to issuance of building permits, since precise designs and plotting have not : been submitted for review at this time. G. Summar of Deer Creek Home Owners Neiohborhood Meetings: The app ;cant con ucte two separate neighoorncod meetings with home owners in the existing portions of Deer Creek. The major concerns of the Deer Creek home owners are increased t-affic, and higher density (i .e., smaller lot and house sizes). A ` group of home owners felt that the developer has •adequately mitigated these concerns by the provision of similar Lot widths and sizes for those lots abutting the existing Deer Creek Development to create a buffer zone, the provision of two points of access to Haven Avenuc to channel traffic away frcm Hiilside Avenue, and assurances from the developer that the product would be the same as the existing Deer Creek. However, another group of home owners had strong concerns over the issue of how this proposed subdivision will affect their property values and their investments. jr F, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12650/Deer Creek May 23, 1934 Page 5 H. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the development of the proposed subdivision. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FIP�CINGS: The findings listed on the attached Resolution are sa:pported by the following facts: o The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the developer and the proposed single family uses are in accordance with the objectives of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. o The proposed site plan, in conjunction with the Conditions of Approval, is consistent with the current development stn^-'ards of the City. IV. CORRESPO".DE^10E_ This item has peen advertised for public hearing and environmental review in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site and to all the home owners within the existing Deer Creek development. Correspondence has been received ,...d is attached for your review. V RECWV1E4DAT.I0N: The Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed project based on the findings and Conditions of Approval as recommended in the attached Resolution. Respe tfull y s bmitted, Ri.ck C tv Planner R.G:NF:jr 1 r 6 PLANNING COt"NISSIO`J STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12650/Deer Creek May 23, 1984 Page 6 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Plan Exhibit "C" - Natural Features Map Exhibit "D" - Tentative Tract 14ap Exhibit "E'" - Details of Lot Dimensions & Lot Sizes Exhibit "F" - Tentative Tract/Grading Plan "Exhibit "G" - Details of Cross Sections Correspondence Developer's Letters of Intent Initial Study, Part I resolution of Approval with Conditions r - - . � sx s�u�uHllf.. _ u�u�uu11�11/ Fc VL FC NIL FC Lm CITY OF ITILN r • ID -' �: -.�: it �K r� i! ..•:. rl r�.r7 r Y. ? : JP ■i�:ii y 1 slip, I Ll st i / w c - ri w ��•I!i1' 'S F ? 1RN.�i�:w 1Jr4 I{� 1 tea- �--� .•... av ism �; —i U � l A .r• ; 5 ;€s�lll • re �f ��it ;. V o A � r `�t�`�Z� lit ��`111 \1.�" _] I�"•-�- -l—� a � 0 < Iva Ic {'jcI1 \1 fi i it �1�5 �� FQ' v V: E v a, m 3:13 / )11j� ! 1L �{f 1 `z` � nJ��1 �" , � I L1 �, wit qv � c v r � : Y Y 5' � 1 Ica :L Y•Y " • 17 zZ ` `no Q��i n �9'�ISi e_. 1. 4ei23iGig s i � o ' ,: : .:'']�iY C:7. f.--TCr��cr,=iM6�T�::T•�j Y4_-_l_?��; moo_ Y Y 3 1 S:'I /r/ 4 , �i 1�'ef� =r.1, i s o S I• -i� - E�i:II i� JI � 0• f f•l`�, � .` N Y L. / evol • �'�?'--�T-7t'r-�-�-t--fir--;—"�-� �---; / I I11I I � � ` --I L tl ! / � I 1, I � �• i I I 11 I I / '�. �;_1 ` acre �� . I —�--�}'--•—�— �� I 5 J I W. 133a15 \ •'ill 90 V•. . 6 = r ^i' - m j 15 un {D r i Ifs y �. 133a15 � •Sb� ' ——— 71 �- ¢�s clLU o,I r f ��: I I s rijj T _ -- av,s � z ts it S n e• i ti I I ,�y 1 � : I �• of Pe .. .-.. ' u I P - — -- . .+ L •. i'• t' Wu I Kl} I ir - tiarwr t7 • a-o.. �+ I —� .--._ _ • uti tans an • 'y1 � \� +� ► iy _ _ I 1 � i Cie Ir • '' i � Its � . � J a' •3 s _ ;a�• ,•- ip o _ v _ 3 a _ 11 lk I S .�h_=• _ r = . . ZnX31- L r !VA 17 f 7.C:1i Iet.CNZt'A LD Al 171 LZ }> 7I ��' I � r. i J' �%- �{) l •QI I( � t•j r � r�l ' 1 1 it 1 r • � � ,.. � i:, w I_ f� an i 'i;��• ;' �: � ._ ,� I e. �- ; c i I ,�i as � �. Coe a .a ... y»Is ram_ l `ff_ j t e �ZS `F: a`r'- �—vim� v_ .../// 'j •—� -z (/ � , � v.f—1' 1. s. �. i J r c _3 S 3 • i �, Q�z 9 ! LXJ 1'a ' caj •l Oi � � t I� _! ti i .. t � � i i ) 1 / 11 t t� E.• �. tr � ' a; p �� ^— � �� to :. � • � i� 1 � � [n 1 r�F." wz XV it f 2k 1 • / JI `�:.�' �• ,. ` Y� ,�1 `� ! ill I '` fFLz rH � at 04-45 vi i k5 �� `� rti ' "S,a . �, /' Ili _/ .t / �' �- •�_ / t._ .� i E It I 1 � t f 1 nS. � \ ` •r ,-Tt 17 Ll f ` tCS�_ ��: , r I,-xn� / N � r /2P a r �p F _01It . - - - - " j\'rig \`. s r ia ZJ / Ns llllll C/ T�\� zu rz ! a r / Pgz EI lit / � Ice l/r� • / L t � k.l� L t ' � � L U.2 E- �/ Ir �T 7•i/��.�/it i� y l�, KIN' / �!!. •� � r ' ';� ,ate 1 o.� �Zt.- )6 rC C4 .Y • t �• � is > OJf� i�;l r! � t �� r!/7 Q�Z tILL !� .. - - • tom. v� I fit r fl�� 7' ' \•`, / - ) ® Fib =- t-• ? ! l � fir- Lij F n a• t I Yr io r ;: _ � � ,, � � , Wig• 2.�► � � ;/. '•r . L ,i � �r� aria•_ >M �� 1 /� .. 4 17 v :toz Ezra _ b: as �� •v_ � I` � . �" a -•?is Z. Le Ir mi ``, �� `; � .ry �. .t ' ` Cyr . o' s ''•`Yo_ �� l•jE �J f• � � ►� g 1 .`lam� •C ' c _i �� 1 � t � \•� v Is: azaa 7x _ _ = l .\ � � \ �� '_._ .� �•. i •#i ' — � � .ram, e � � i ` a uz— CIA de lip ~2. -J3. evta • ` � � I � l -a�iti' ��Iv � .. � � \ � � ( • ' J' :'.�i tea ' � ai n fill, ir hit r./ �� i •,— _ __ _ __ 3SYHd .e oy me a *sssa�;ws vru ZE r . rr 14 Oki i 1: • r f �- 4�F Y J i 1 _��1 � � _ � '� � � , �� ' _ •fin — j iwi ZI, A. sr r ti \ _. s 'a awl_`../ �_ ;� -+ `:g : � .�� tea.,: • ` c - ._ =- a l /� er _ •` �t I` _ ` 1 t N1 i q r Ptil /4�`/ � ; .� �. \��' - •. /` is \ _ p y Ot JW At r> \J vim+ cZ lu 00 �- C- :.:Z Y ti U U u � r , NyjL VP 14 as F - u i.J i ¢ n` s Y Ll zME i:�i�23 ,� •1��y7__ cil 4�� : ca it t IN zi V ) _, •, 1 a CI :1 a- � V g 1 a c W r:e Q U touVii� _� n IU =Z b h N N N �Ziv F .J • 6 F FI — i LD _' tL.. F — tt �,� �.' E'.y a �: � =1`r � 1 ✓; • �: by ) ii b� �>f 3. V� � 6 i aF x� ti� jc °• iF z 1 I y J r Hti February 17, 1984 Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucmonga, Calif. 91730 Re: Tentative Tracts 12650 , 12650-1, 12650-2, 12650-3 Gentlemen: and 12650-4 . This letter is to advise you of our intent regarding the development of the above refere) :ed tracts. We will be building substantially the same type of homes that now exist in the Deer Creek development. Any new floor plans we may introduce would be compatible with the existing homes, having the same architecture, roof tile, -olors, etc. We also intend to continue the trail system, planting and white rail fencing throughout the total development. We feel the chance from one acre to half acre lots will not substantially change the ambiance of Deer Creek. You may assure any concerned homeowners that we plan to carry on our same high standards of design and construction throughout the development and b be proud of. uild a community they will Sincerel4ri William y WGR:pmg THE DEER CREEK COMP.Ol' MS70FFICE BOX 488 AIT LOTIUAL1FOMA 917Q1 (/14) 989 3323 � ' :Say 1, 1984 Tim Beedle, Senior Planner 9340 Base Line Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUMJECT: r_= C_?:.�ti DE%MCi^}.tern' - TRACT 12650 Dear Mr.ji__ T110 The Deer Creek Company has been designing and building the Deer Creek project since 19-7, as an exclusive estate residantial coz= pity. We believe that we have successfullv achieved the development of one of the finest residential communities in Rancho Cucn=onga. ® The last phase of the project has been somewhat delayed as a result of the economic recession. We have 146 acres remaining in the project, north and adjacent to the existing units. We have spent the last several months designing a subdivision plan for this area. Over the last coimle of years, ae have become more aware of the buyer's prefer- ence fc•r an estate size lot and home. A significant portion of buyer's desire tc have a lot size less than the current lot size existing in Deer Creek. In consideration of this and the inflationary aspect of the econcny, we are proposing to subdivide the remaining 11.6 acres into slightly smaller lots. The proposed lot size ranges from 20,000-38,000 square feet, in com- -rison to the existing lots which range from 29,000-`:0,000 square feet. i..e average will be veil within the minin•,mt average required by the City Code. The density equals 1.54 dwelling units per acre. The re- duced lot sizes are in no vay intended to alter the quality, value, and elegance of the Deer Creek comunity. This phase of the development would contain the same concepts and quality with regard to grading, trails, landscaping and archl`ecture. Our current thinking is to can- strucl homes of approximately 2,900-3,600 square feet. The architectural design gill incorporate the same exterior materials and We have already processed the proposed design_ through the City's various ::ommittees and have revised it in accerd:nce with their reco- aaendations. In addition, we have conducted two neighborhood meetings with existing Deer Creek homeoc.-ners. In response to the first meeting we h_ increased lot sizes adjacent to the existing homes for a THE DE£R CREEK COMPAM °OST OMCE BO\488 AM LOMA.C.AUFOIRNR 91701 (1714) 989-3323 ' Page two — Tract 12650 smoother transition ( this resulted in a loss of 8 lots). Also, we have added another access point along Haven Avenue to encourage traffic movement toward "aven rather than south, through the existing homes. We conducted a second meeting to review our charges. While the majority of homeowners are in suppor� of our design, here are those who are accusing us of proposing to build "cheat' homes." dais philosophy appears to be based solely on lot size. We kn.cw from history, that lot size is no. th-- deter—mining factor on the value or quality of the home. Several rezidents are complaining, recause the economy has not allowed the^ to sell their homes at the price they desire. They are concerned that we will sell homes for less *ban theirs. Our new homes will most likely be selling for more than our current sales price. This is due mainly to the current land value, fees, cost of construction, and cost to sell the house. We simply want to inform the City that we !'ally intend to continue this development with the same quality and elegance for which Deer Creek is known. Our company name was founded on this development and we in no way intend to Jeopardize our reputation. We are atteiapting to complete our development package in order to be placed on the Commission agenda l of May 23, 1984. If you have any questions prior to that time, please feel free to contact us at your convenience. SitIcerell Michael D. Vairin, Director of Administration and Planning MDV/me CO.VINIUN17 Y R .a. r. . :.NGA E+ ,'CP67cNT nFP7 //, MAY 1 ! i984 / ArA C; :." /y'�G�' : (✓/�l::rC� /'�� 7�8�9�_Qil1�L�112A415P6 ��l /' cf Z-7�'��LIf �7r/I��• �+/CL�• ///!!il/IZI�`� `�J7/7/�.G�d��GfO �Z✓� �� C�%IZ�i� /' 77= � ✓Gc ��J :/�.21-Z.� G-y�-GC�;�LGrG-P�l-� ��f�' ,C��ziG�GG�C/ '� /�t��- �fl� ��u�'.Z,��-n:�c�ou—✓r.�-�fin/ sc� - 11 V b V G V E 0 .#i�c.4 �¢✓A+.q CITY 9F RANCHO CUCAMONGA CoN,:al.,ffY OEVE,JPMEN?OEVr. __-- FRAY 17 Z84 awaa nSa-.ak Nd PSI 9e701 718191101u1tIb121t 141616 yy1�- 14t 99* --- - --- - _ .0.0 a �/;(is�� 2d•-- -- -- -- ILL fropo aO ao elct.^5�� aiF-�c�cr^°L�f _v,�..�_ be a2c� •_��___n��no -�u� - -/vLiol.�MK-_�"`0—nO.LQ�,C:a r.�.. — S r r 7-V ^ I 3� v- ? 4 O C4 C f J _ q � -•- JT C044-1 c Z � ` z ` •`CC r 5 —4 z— s J aci y d nnz] 1 • r . l A S � K .. r CITY OF llCFr::NGq COti9Murit i r DEVEt OPP.It PT, ® MAY Cl 5 J �X,�• �c�. G,t 1 �.lc� �� cJl�..e� aa(UXO Pyv�zz) t"'wL LS Q k, r f ' > �D +v, _ � d, alrA Lull, ucil 6ka v OLIIWV � � J qc c� CLA CLI aA� - act J (cLkil- po Y-2 g_ l i � - Uj ( J rl ilL LUA V�'l� �✓v v�' rl,J;�.,�� to ox :/u C', CL/I IIL �-� JCS. t�,�-t u � CL:� ' J J J DEPT. ;:iNY 1 'l iG�4 .•'? __ 2 �':r1 t2^n _r. �'^-- ___ _.._"�__ .CL:r n_cn _:.�';C or-. _ >rnyl-= --5 -;'+sr n_c - a- -._•:�__nC r-. mr:n- r. �•)e C=nslc-ar nis __^a.a - wer= tc-; d tv trte tsveln e.r wr=n :ie or2�� -�_ :•/ rCr.S: _eror! -,c_".e • n JBer _rBBtti. . - -�•� ^L:r .]or_ c- rn -- -.._,rr^nca r n$T_ .,..� aar= tea _= DY C`!- .-+2V_� •_==r . _CT_^. Crmii:• =nn 1!1 .ar1t:-�^ . _-ie L'. =i^ate -eve 1^_L1Tonr GG _.,e _ecr -r==.' no-mes c= equal or better Quality on _G== C= same or larger size. Lase❑ on Ti^.== 'n-sr,=.,:!en our Gcc7 S-ai-ti _r. Cn-e nave_=nor wi zei 'C _ = 1SVoc_frFaf,r• _ -ecr C ai, nome ;•ou;r. _r�nrecl c,r e < :ngr - - - r , : .. ..a�e r once rp US. `rc - : _ .. _ . OCu S_. T. e ^1 c.n-•'_•^r a: _Ciior ed ;:n.oe_ _noL-.,. r.o r.L.i _t at fl?�ner CMs aeve_=er _ _ ❑rCCe__n- '-=: e 1: let '. . smaller , less expensive homes _r. _ - _s Gne : .a1,: -_ t;,o ?:r-5 the a__a 4 rresent. r.eer CI-ee:: _Ct-. his i.i7L:_n _-?cr Base t:?_ �r,�Si r❑ =en51=�,• ='S�' �"3 7o'ne5 CM - --• __ • _. hones Mn 7 acres) . Via:= `faVe made Sunstantia_ _nveS_men-cs _n our hole a',z nrr•sorts. iainroveme!,ts 5i.nce we moveo -- nF", freest in icveroer . 19?=. This sizable investment was also based primarily on our confidence and trust in the developer doing what he told us he would do regarding the future development of Deer Creek. L:a _co _!-e- de^Vejroerc new GrC=CSal as a 'breech? c_ �i c t4•cart. V;e C?_ _cV5• :?? . ?o g ^!nr ay ar_ s ^cs eCLi^3t1 =.. to _r_ _^ `S15 Grim .^.=.- .-:a [:nC:VL•^.1= C�^n�oSai 1? 11 Cr= 2nd 3.^_V•=r5= v arT cC:= _._. ,`^-,�erty - ._ Yours . � s __. . a _. __�• =r1 �can >� � l f CITY OF Re-NC.O IIVITI L STL-DY �. PART I_ PROJECT NFORMATION SHEET To be c0nole_ted by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: 587. 00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this fora must be ccr..pleted and submitted to the Develenment Review Committee through the debar`...-^.Ent wiere t_'ne project appilcatlon is made. UcoR recelat or this atp'__cation, the EnvirOnmental Analysis staff will prepare Part IT- of the Initial Studv. The Development Review Ccrnittee will meet and take a.:ticn no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting. at which tuna the project is to be heard. The Co=iittee will :lake one of three dete=iinatiens : 1) The project will have no sicni- fica,t environ.-ental impact and a Negative Declaration Will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environ=ental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional infor-.-ation renort should be Supp'_`_ed by the applicant giving further info^a- tion concerni.7-3 the proposed project_ PROJECT TITLE:_ Tract No. 12650 APPLICr%TV S NA'ME, ADDRESS , TEI:ZE PHONE: Deer Creek peye 1 n ,mP.,t- P- 0- Box 488, Rancho Cucannn.._n ot -;ni (714) 989- 4�i _ NA,%M, ADDP-ESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO 3E CONTACTED CONCERJ:ING THIS PROJECT: William Grigsby, 9524 19th Street Alta Loma, CA 91707 ( 9 -3433 LCCATION OF PRoj�_= (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. ) LIST UTF-ER PERMITS NECESSARY FRCM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENC; ISSUING SUCH PE 0ITS : City Permits for aradinq and all other improvements will reguired- I-1 ® r nDOJECT DES(_RTDTTQN DESCRT_TTO.4 OF PRO,._-^_': Protect is a redesign of Tract No. 9584 , 9584-1 ai-d 9584-2 , having an average loc area of 22, 500 square foot aid a_ -Animum lot area o.- 20 , 000 square foot. ACREAGE OF 1ROJECT AREA Aia SQUARE FOOTAGE Or EXISTING ANLD PROPOSED BUILDINGS , IF ANY: No buildings exist on site. Project area is aDDrox r'jr� ty 149 acres. New homes will range from 2500± sa_ Pt to 4000ty- �t_ DESCRIBE T ? `�NVIR0:7XE--4TA?. SETTING Or THE PROJECT S=TE I2'CLUDI27G�INFORM_ATICN ON TOPOGPA_D Y, PLA-NTS (TREES) , ANII�A S, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCE`IIC ASPECTS , USE OF SUR- RCLNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AttD THEIR US'; (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : Site is d4rec• 1y south of Hillside Channel and East of Haven Avenue It has a aently soi, ly gym_ IY_ basic�l _ 8g No onsite topog-aphv is signific -has some niror rock outcropnirgs wi�r, n^ huil,iinas onsite- e One half acYe QtS -dr ' ar3Pr hov"' ' ^^_nctr Tc rnr3 rn r_ south and west� Mnrrh of rrn Hillside Channel and to the r4ct .' haven Avenue has been !mDroved al one' hP aPcrarl i nrn,n, a Y t'. 3 existing streets , Cani st i Valinda Ayenuehlave. been constrnntPd �^ iha arn,rh �r�v -tea t boundary. All wi 11 be t�ti l i ?c� i n t n n�„nt ti nn 'a, th r� ,ocT yy_ 2 Is t:-e project part of a larger project, one of a series or cuyulatiee actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental iapact? No, Project is a redesign of 3 previously recorded tracts that had somewhat largerlot areas and is a coutinuat�on of Tract Nos. 9582 and 9583 1-2 .i l _,c W7"L TfiIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a s�stantial change in around con tours? _ X 2, Create a substantial ciia_1ge in existing noise Or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial chance in der.and for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, X 4. Create changes in the existing zon=ng or — ' general plan designations? _ X �. Reaove an, ex=stiI:a trees? ?'_ow ranv? _ Create the need for use or disposal of pote:tially hazardous materials such as tcxic substances , flunnables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: I YIP 0RT ANT_ If the pre j ect involves t* a co:. .truction of residential units. cemplete the It,'^ or. the next page. �cRTiFIG9TION: I here:_ certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and info=-matio:i required for this initial evaluation to tL e best of my ability, and that the facts, statements , and infc-matior presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional infor^.aticn r..av be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be ^•ade by the Develo nt Review Cc ttee. Date 2-14-84 Signature Title --- 1-3 should ne _ -o r_ e_ �c �.e C'_:? o= _ o =.a=._ 7i.=s_-r. _: cr_e= _- ai_ is rassass4-c t__e b4 a= tt le c",O o ca _ _ _ �^._ sc.co �o acc� __cdate he _..sec _es_ceaz_a1 `'a-P- OL CevelC- 2= and Tentative =aCz Ve _ :-Dee-- Creek DevelCDIIleAt'Tract 12650 'peC_=-C CCat O' ?rC ject: SOuI♦L O: iJ listde C1dn_^.el mast Of .^:dVoR VeRUZ cf 42 _r ua =s: 0 0 0 0 0 0 3. :;ac= c=ccose� to Mid 1.984 85 M-id' SS Kid' 86 arly ' S7 * z=__est date o�- occ =azcr: Earl,, 2985 lid' SS Early' 86 ' ate ' 86 :'!CGeL E a:G 4` RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12650, T'JE DEER CREEK COMPANY, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, SOUTH OF HILLSIDE FLOOD CHANNEL AND NORTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD - APN 201-121-16. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12650, hereinafter "Map" submitted by The Deer Creek Co„oany, a�pl ica^t, for the purpose of subdi•iiding the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a custom lot subdivision of 147.16 acres into 225 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on May 23, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered zhe Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evide. e presented at the public hearing. ® NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of P,ancha Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Corcrission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12650 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements o, the tentative tract is cons tent with the Gener,.l Plan, Development Code, and _.ific plans; (c) The Sipe is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental dariage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for acce! s through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. F- Al `� Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create averse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION! 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12650, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLA1:";IN:G DIVISIOv 1. Precise designs, architecture and plot plans shall be submitted fcr design review and approva: by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits. 2. The developer shall be responsible to install and maintain the perimeter landsc-ipe parkway on haven AveIlLe prior to annexation into the City's landscape maintenance district. ENGINEERING DiyiSION 1. Proposed storm drair shall be exte-ded to the intersection of "E" and "N" streets, to int•:rcept all ;lc:js north of "B" street east of ",: ' ':reet. Design of other prGPosed and existing storm drains shah conform to City standards. 2. Additional cross gutters shall be provided at the followina intersections: "J" and 9" street; Valintia & "B" street=; Valinda and "A" streets; "N" and "A" j streets. j 3. Flood protection walls shall be provided along the frontage of lots 56, 57, 33, 34, 43, 44, 114 and 115 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Hillside Drive Master Planned Storm Drain shall be i extended to Deer Creek Channel from existing terminus. Easements shall be obtained by developer. Construction costs will be credited to storm drain fees. f, APPROVED AND PDOPTEO THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ` BY Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTE`T: Rick Gomez, Deputy ecretar �� Resolution No. Page 3 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of May, 1994, by the following vote-to-:,it: AYES: C011MISSIONERS: NOES: CO'�tMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Qi I o's -_ap• � "� � -:•.' - �_ 4 GL � - N yr 'o-L-. �.+ o �o c- dn L o any cp _ �J oc` cu zi "'J Ems - -- _ u... � - ',�„✓_� c : a _ _ p x >r ' i..' V % ^2 „per.-... VVOy� N � V•rV CGAd O.VV •N � v. V [' O .n 2-• CV -, Ong �� 9v Pr - Gq IGa Vu. ` ✓� o � G CV � O - O ^ C•.•�� -1 -• - --. co onq V .Luc � NN u o - o: o cc u ,ni.4` c -' o -o "..: z - _ ,i- mCO.L .. - u- •DL .= coM � o on .. __ u Vic.•'. o�� " -tom N {`. _ u- �� _ �_� r' c APT �L c'^•� 'o •' 'c° v >V..:o __M .� �� I V�C a c�G E c I N^_o d D r- c -VJ m N i d V� G=� '-•y - r r 'r - - J V, • 0 � 1 � � y i T v•T.�� I�I �✓ m � � e u �c��c N v y • «� d d 0 V - v q r.>�� V r 0 r I 6 Y D y L uL arc n a 9 V TNi I�•VQ of doE I .a '^ �u,e ' .-we • O a � L `V I N 6 I r'`- 417 �c9a naJ.•. a.N�_.c i,_ ` >�V Gv ur v ✓ L 4 a4 avv c c cpi saa � oN .' ' o� �- c �^tn muoL C_co y q�r- o✓ � - c>, �r - -� P V L V N - Y O � �✓ N q N _n n _ _V r N - O. +-✓ ~ C L O✓ N F C N N N r O n L L N_G P x C cG.• n 9 V r rr C O�a L�d C n N c n o� b C = n�^ C V •Oi� U C ` � > U r O q C T C \' V C r �p � ✓ C✓ a V•�.. v. 0 G'00 Jn > Ga NN t 'JCn i OigN >> O �^9C � C C L C D i N �'�.� C N V a O • n � € G G N u q L V ^ C J O G r_ V�_ � N G r^ V 'T C a `' N N V �- > IV• O� C �J U .' iN.• i � q6q' � � 1n� a ` V� O� V r U rG OVG > `' �� V L � � E N J^ 9 T C� V w�.� �•�� V C O M 6 Q t Q L q- OT - cVUr.N.•` O `c+ .- Ua .^ •`= V S Npr= c � scs.. vN - - _ �c - ie"'_ss.N. o � ✓j = cs.N,d - - c_ _- O V G = c o >•c 6 N`, _ � .�i•O - N y d .e L' Di COE-r �9 -V✓✓ P VV - �.> V c= N .Li• � �-..r �Q.- •v r _ t g C 9 G_ V U " u � �,•'�_ _ru J.q_ L= V�� NCV N LN EVa �uN ^' __ C 9 N s �• •r C N O L O „" � O�•9.G y._ V CI G N C Gr � O l_�'C) VG "•...p V�L y0 C- •CN C�•r .-.. N _` COaO. G _ C - - c Lc g4rc`c_o ` o�� `-' 'ODo c c � 4 Ni ^✓ n� pq '^� ... co•.•�� G .-.eMp�n _ q C v -+ V\ '`✓ G L G r N_ g y C J M L y p G _ > G C P L V r Z •i PNNO9O q P> Cq GN •'� �• qd LN V- C r 09N rn= 9✓- •+i�9 4 CI gqq GCL-= CCy • Lcy � f� _L: Fv _ V E. V C _ V O•_ C u. .� y- N� •Oi.n� yi NaU � 6V M •On y•O+..C• G ur- j DC QJ6V Q NO < Mrp V� I u N 1 G_ F rJn_C VT Cr q -1Q .yv�O r _UON •r4TLp ry VP La c r a ` c G n0. Idiq" �rL GAL 4E u✓22- LN ' N� LCN 1" d £ VLOLgS C✓..• y Q ^�9+\6 GV�� - V � ` nE r0 9_ -H =9•r Llr0 � d � C•'] qy CIgFV qz � n qq0 06 d� ggCVu qr L•w T NCC< ✓ G 'q Gr _ _ V✓_ N L MyC N >-J ¢qiC✓ •�nL� l O ,,>oi _' .r .Gi .•a _ y .•^ nos " c- ` �c� � : c✓�� o --' o �s� C' p, - �a c�A q� c� 'o cv y.✓ cn`n co_ C M V N L r r q q N r C g C N q L •n l_ L•'n GO OC C_ rC�� >V 6L. O�y- � O � r✓ N O q•Ee O CLi g V � L �7 y �V r C' O ..r N V r� � C C•L .L.. C� - z z M `a.yG c u.. s n as- i ,�;co-� � zc Lc •„ W q� - r sir cc '_ c c vp _r L >•' n O V G- L•i q - V• n- G C � L' c - T N_d c G q L O P � � VN � NC tOL l � GqU �C�^ C ^_.✓=r G CAM ` C•rG 9 -_.rN � lc� 9V NC C rC'� cgi OGc < Cq 9SO C r_ � E N- OG£' ^ ACT V � 6q ju 4CnC G - - C Ci G� •u C• � C C` __ O E C y. q O n �. n V C= •� V C i C � � C>• E_=C N S r C V ._•C L L C .• '• y_ O N ." O r.n.. l" a L 9 V� > Lr9C C09? CCO 9T q ...! C i V OOT C'l_. TOr C �q °=- M� Saou�-N+ •r� 0 � OVV 7 rV r >�6Vq O VV69UM VOn.O.. F >p CVf '1 - N� G�-N p N S 1 6 V J r 9 n U L� P r Y r C q �r g Q q n Q �✓- 6 \ `\ C: _=•y, y_•L _r =C �. - _ � Ste ] c � .' .j � _ c yc� . 1` >^ OC y y _ P _ •j �b� �^_C L ��ON Ca N ,Ui, J� 2 "� p ' r � �G j Ury N ,' Gc p y� � o' v L Pri V�f _ L C •" N � N L J cL Gc " r P� N.o,..o. y � o� �F. c-a ao ` G •. yrr aca� oa� =rn O � a o a�`'� c c=r- oy c •^a 4 �n6L. m e b fL.,L o r� m c PI�.v = J.'�t•d ^ G � C.� TPpir �� v G C � ,w a 00 NO✓ry NL� 6C .� rr,0i �+W �i., = dN � Tr VJ S � 4b YvVV Q9� O QiOi •r OOOw � NL v.—+ .n N ,o r•' i 4�CG NO •Ti O,n M VC LO � T6CC Gw` L OC Syq LOBO CO =r PG � N I N 6 V 6 L L p L r V � 0 � •L„6.-. 61 `p ..•O G � r N L q L V pr y c N V•fa 4O T Ey e- _ i `n > Nwi or > a.ZrN se _ rL 4 F L G C y C CI ai S O T O O N y O ` �b 1TLr yC • G V� L <Np V -42 _ �j� L _ `� � PY r b 0• V T OCJ � r� y 0 O u S L I G L C N` QI r " c V VL wCd .'L rG�� dr wlnr E..� 9r y ,Le cN=Tb cL� c E_ qCN.'.. � Nuc uc �•�.., > c _� '^ ro cam. ? odc T >o L� L o dT cq� .-'.. •n mow= •s_ —1 r of _ " moc o.o.`r i_'_ � rv.y +- yc • .ci c• a.q. V� __ •9c T rC _' �- C F G ui TyOC N� I d O L pa,� �� _ bL 9 LL irLG j^� r^ rbC aim O .4..� � LO GyGI V� Y gC_ 7' S� Lu� > rllP rlQ nql P.� _ _ L i r .. cc-' L -- _-• .. Lqm rL o PLP a' n T L L O— r A a � T i `O L '� O � .i.•b L P.N y N u aN y_N o o v` �Lri ccly do =.' � N E p= p L„ c - r m .eme� < T <br � pN 64.1 O' � O �T CI 6Nnq v •O.,•` N rcr 4Z N � _ N tl� CI WV• 06I NO 6N N O N t T i G41 NI al N( b i 1 ✓ _ dy d T. iC5 �� OI n� C NV � -�� C �✓ VV C' T Gy '� �G W 4�I G C V` 2 N d T „ C O N .lr•L..r l ' L� yI TG C Cr yG VN V ✓ - C V CNM C �• � C' � T n 'J .l.a q =r C 7 4 �. y - Cr O T L - rl y •O ^_ T= V ✓ VGnL V_ __ TV - C rV �_ � np CC 6��_ Q 'Jd ... 0 Lx �� y'VG ,JO V ✓�U =I COC=�` �JirU-�L v C CO G> Mu ' GJa L_ 9 �� cl p ..:=_ rN. `_'N- •' .i = � � =1 v .G.c � v__ _a mM cE�_� =.'.. _I GI V•JV ^ �_ Tr GL OJ3N7 l - '" QE N V dq q Vy wN'� V� ^VW C 6a 1rN Gr p N �� 6Va Wtiq yy jn {:1� 6x 6✓ •j; N III _ �- ^� ® 1 C d 0 ✓ � 9 4 .r A 4 q N T y ✓- 9 9 V Q - E G V n I� � - -O -• > O F G � 4� tOiv= �j �4O IN r �GLa _ ✓u .5i Cy n - Mum o: �d - l� = I o�=•o Tic N a0 6 y � ✓ oY N F =,'. n {v O � qo �Q/ E ==M G 0 O N C P L C r Gr£• ^ N V_6' O d I J O I �C�y0� L t N ' T a n i E V y V d m '�^ C y C'° v I m ✓ e u_u d.^ � G J N _ -• L..-.G.. `. ¢L- .- I✓ - ate" c G c- i s ✓ G DL - - T t .0 t ^✓_ G ` ✓ O �� C C O M r ` N -cN m7 a n O N �•Ci � � r 6 O N r - ^ ^ _ M C n c I ✓ O E d G C P O C V- O O U �'� -- O� C y � 4✓ L. C J_ 73 d C d C u 'Z L 4 G >O 6 6 C C V C I a V E = 6 d r C .eL < 6 6 bi �_ t5D �Vlf �• F � VVViyV •f VJ�9_ yC L yV V VLrr V tih1 _\l1 �I �n T n d_I � �•� q b i O V ^lJ 7 N \v If a.y v — pvP cL 6 C' V a l r O v c E L G V i• J �l 0 e •Vr• 33 Cn O r N 1 d V 74 a L G G y S I I L N O L N G L u q O `•l O C V d d_ • � r V 7 O _ Cr V Y V y�V\y�� V`l 0 l L_ N C � O r•O C _�G �. _V V v •dr `r a 1 ( C T Oar 00 J� w r• O ou Y w „a _ •.. .L. ou c� O r_ u u_ yi 2 I S'y _� EEC `u O.0 ate• (Ec9- T q� _ O d r L C� GQ IlrcL] GIJ. L q S q e �� 9 C� GL� N n � O -9 `r• 6 C n C � C Zni =N I � `.� C ^pp�±.� Ne N�� rr ^a � u '- NO - p•- a Oq G V7= yE cTc VC V� cSid 140 P$ •Ora �� r t0 Oc_ O� q Vc yam •O .. •C Ny � Od V W� a•^'I QVr i 00 � ON � ��` `r d•'a 6 O N�C R _ t t V V L C` t J^ C rJ rr � 2 t � _ .r O = ya I qF 6r .� O r\� ll gGo7 iq6 O � � � N� uI ruW-� � q Y j a t C P- �' C 9 r q^- O � q y q l C •n v �� r E C V O w ^J+ y` G�- J O G 9 V V� ( ` y I •. _ �r v- ` cq - q L of viu � N -_= v •u,. cvv_ .on E fi• I \o I LG y E .dU.. q. c r �� M ou Lr vc o v c do ? u aTCr yc•nu �yu�E .O.• c.. rr0-v6E y p • � �� ( l6` Cd qCC Pd G1 OJ- yG dp• Os q C1YOG d G q_V t1NC '. 60 VU •ti. �a nP '�'' ��' A V Pnr ' �_` c c J= y •e`=� LOGO r0 LF � O• � d" 3GOt Oq Mr j qGE -uqN qC v O � S 9�•re� V C � P �' v N d '�= y V, � O O� ` L' � qrN VwT �' nCi. VN�•-_•� P 6N Vt a � 'V9_V Lr r4.Q_ Or G..• V _ _ u �V�jjC _ r0 C ` rV LC `� � � N d _ L r� ` y N � GrO fJr OL •Oi•4V_• C - r _ .V.• p� L C ` O V M C C C O ^O •Or C'GVa �' GG' ^d- � L u M- c E c � e- c o� N _._ c r r �'-.• con 9 rr C CqG P CC.,y ^YCrC r• . ` � r1 EN O E CT� 1] L•r- O T n O C � G u q N N� C�V r� �I V V - m nw � -` dim �..`-`_�: _cLj tc'•e <' a ^.el - c V .� O yd� TC 6y1� �V 'yCN PCC . �.-.bC- cP N =u r V 6 q_ V N O v N.V.• N > f� -O- p Ct N•(• 6 r t :i •p Nn N G ll O r•r V O n w S q Vey q q V9w tq Op,` O6� E� L \V.OG 4r\ 60 VO C•O OI � y W �v uI c WI l I I Y 1 o i✓o.2 T C J✓ N C P Y N U ' C _ Q a N v ' N r 1 - Na_✓ _ a c � cf � — O dC N 6• a, >✓ >, � � m ~� yar T L � - I roc �o c' o _ V CET Aci = N6_.� V V I -6 � SC VS T T Cr V iFh V N O_ y 7V L9 `C✓ a l �l l T r ULO V � L` Dy jC� N V VC �� ✓ 17 r ` Cr u. ' d C� J S L b ✓ T V T � M✓_ � N i O j 9 C r C V r O✓ -'• C�V � P G L ' p O `o V V T O L V .` u d _u L t ✓�,�.. 6 G ' O l 6 occ a _ P� Go a — '^ a, a I SST S � Ec wu c I L V y6 r✓ G a � 9 V O a L � Y d V 1 GSV NO P� J... Ey✓ r VL a I _ CO LO �� O > � 1 c o:. N o = v i✓G o o �� - — I r o n �a o � ` n W l k: C Gn N _ i r J• � q L N G � CO O d d N I C T�+ i N✓ Pd or GG- a cc r oc� cry oG c " 9 r' i✓ I �'' '• c N' y r O✓ O= N c ✓ LO.+i � � i :. � N c•=c 4 T � �".A� LW Cr �V V`� G 9�`. rN 8, 6q' N 1 OCO G✓V 11d OL C+ 4 N LV 36 VO '� 9 r�r✓ 66N G 3 C I a ' Y O — O 4i •-TOL.. a.. COO C �/ PV C >� 4 ✓ c P n'¢ _ = L t . a H r cIV C� > G✓ ✓CC c _ U ✓ O S O ¢r CyQ- y = G G✓ c6 T I:.s 12 O •O W � L C I G'. �G •-^ i• C C T L 4 _ T � N_ W C _ ✓ L L'- r _ q _' _ d d- O V P _ c a •� Sr= T e I I 'j �� o � L•c E U s 7 •Oa `7 j r.' C V C C r` l V Z P U V C r I O r N L t l N N = l ^ c �f d c � > • V .0. riOy_ q I n � �G Ur GE GV N N N > N V OC o �� f I c�.>� ac• � n ad o �}r E a P G j c O v I nu n_ O t t �.o :n F +•'e _ y L q '`^ =)I o." r' ` T ^vG V09 �vr Ld 27 ad '= r o v i - CITY OF R&N�CHO� CCUCCA ML GA MEMNDUM DATE: May 23, 1984 "9 zsn TO: Chairman and Members of th4 Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BE 5EN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND LEWIS HOiIES i A Park Development Agreement between the City and Lewis Homes is in the process of being drafted which will implement Terra Vista's Park ImplEmencation Plan by providing the following: o The Agreement will be limited to only the Park Element of Terra Vista and an assurance by the City that the approved densities within the Plan will not be reduced without mutual consent of both the city and the project sponsor. ® o Any new State laws reducing park dedication standards will not affect the park implementation; plan being agreed to. This Agreement will be delivered to the Planning Commission prior to the`r May 23, 1984 meeting. Should you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to call me or Bill Holley, Community Services Director, at any time prior to Wednesday's meeting. ' RG:jr 1f1 7 ITEM G CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c STAFF REPORT DATE: May 23, 1984 TO: fhairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner i BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-09 - BATES ASHWELL/4AWKINS The development of two industrial/of ice—buil gs tctaling 29,184 sq. ft. on 2.09 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6), located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 7th Street - APN 209-411-01. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of a I precise site plan and building design. B. Purpose: To create two (2) industrial/office buildings 1 toting 29,184 sq. ft. I C. Location: Southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 7th Street. D. Parcel Size: 2.09 acres. E. Existing Zonina: Industrial Park (Subarea C) . F. Existing Land Use: Vacant parcel . G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, zoriza In ustrial Park. South - Vacant, zoned Industrial Park. East - Vacant, zoned Industrial Park. West - Vacant, zoned Industrial Park. H. Industrial S ecific Plan Des' nations: Project Site - Industrial Park Subarea 6) . North - Industrial Park (Subarea 6) . South - Industrial Park (Subarea 6) . East - Industrial Park (Subarea 6) . West - Industrial Park (Subarea 6) . i::, ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RESORT DR 84-09 - Bates (Ashwell/Hawkins) Page 2 I . Site Characteristics: The project site consists of a previously rough graded vacant parcel which ties within the Haven Commerce (Cadillac/Fairview) complex. Currently, the site contains a variety of indigenous field grasses and native plant materials. The site has been improved with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. There are no structures located on the site. II. ANALYSIS• A. General : The proposed industrial/office complex (located along Haven avenue, a Special Boulevard), is designed to accommodate a hybrid of Industrial Park uses which include office, light industrial, and limited support commercial/retail uses (Exhibit "A") . Typically, the complex will consist of two, single-story concrete tilt-up structures (totaling 29,184 sq. ft.) with riverrock columns and planters. Access to the project will be provided via Haven Avenue and 7th Street. B. Special Design Parameters - Haven Avenue Corridor: Background: As you are aware, issues related to the overall function and design of the Haven Avenue corridor have surfaced recently :with the Aja submittal (located on Haven Avenue between 6th and 7th Streets) which was recently denied by the Planning Commission. Planning Cormission issues related to the Haven Avenue corridor include: (I) Linear or strip building configurations and site design, (2) common storefront architecture, and (3) the over-concentration of support commercial uses. As illustrated on the site plan (Exhibit "A") the proposed project, as w-th the denied Aja project, is indicative of the "commercial symptoms" outlined above. The Commission has voiced strong concern regarding the negative implications of establishing a strip commercial appearance within the Industrial Park category of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, in particular along the Haven Avenue corridor. Recently, the Planning Commission has given staff strong direction to prepare design and development guidelines for all Industrial Park categories to include standards for site planning and architecture, and a policy regarding the balance between office professional uses and support commercial uses along Haven, Foothill, and Archibald Avenues. In the interim, however, staff has prepared the following analysis designed to review with the Commission the issues described above as they relate to the proposed Bates (Ashwell/Hawkins) project. r ; PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84-09 - Bates (Ashtiweil/Hawkins) Page 3 :r .._. Intent of the Industrial Specific Plan: The Industrial Park category is designed to project a "campus like" image for firms seeking an "attractive and pleasant working environment" and a `r` " location with high "prestige value". The intent of the Industrial Park area, and in particular the Haven Avenue corridor, is to project a high image office/professional complex while allowing ancillary uses such as limited support commercial activities for the industrial area. The Haven Avenue corridor was never intended to support or encourage support commercial uses exclusively in either its function or its architecture. In particular, Subarea b described development on Haven as providing a high qual '. .y character associated with "office park" type developments. C. Specific Analysis - Bates Project: The following is an analysis of the Bates submittal as it relates to the intent of the Industrial Specific Plan's Industrial Park category. 1. Site Plan/Buiidina Orientation: The s4te plan (Exhibit "A" ens itself predominantly tc support commercial activities by: (a) providing parking adjacent to Haven Avenue, and (b) emphasizing building orientation and excessive storefront windows facing Haven Avenue, thus emphasizing retail oriented activities. 2. Parking As noted above, street front parking is commonly associated with retail commercial activities. Office/Professional uses typically provide pods of parking, or parking located entirely behind a prominent street frunt complex. Please note that the applicant is calculating the required parking stall number using the multi-tenant ratio (where office does not exceed 35 percent of the total square footage) of one space per 400 square feet. However, if the project is predominantly support commercial , the site will be under-parked (1:250 required for commercial). 3. Architecture/Floor Plan: The floor plan of the complex has been divided into many individual units (Exhibit "A") each with a storefront window area facing Haven Avenue or 7th Street. This type of division is commonly associated with retail cortnnercial development, not office/professional activities which require larger floor areas. Note that if this project was not located on a major arterial, like Haven Avenue, the viability of this type of building configuration would be nil . It appears that the intention of this type of configuration is to attract and accomunodate support commercial users. In addition, please note that portions of roll-up service doors will be visible from Haven Avenue and 7th Street. 4 . PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84-09 - Bates (Ashwell/Haskins) Page 4 4. Future Commercial Viability: If predominant support ccmmerc a activities are a lower; to proliferate within the Industrial Park area, they Will detract and weaken the viability of existing "legitimate" commercial activities throughout the City. C. Desian Review Committee: The Design Review Committee was principally opposed to the building site plan and architecture style and use of materials (tilt-up concrete panels) and recommended that the building be re-oriented in order to project a definite h-gh professional/office image. 0. Development Review, Committee: The Development Review Committee was concerned with the proposed shared drive approach on Haven Avenue and recommended that a 30-foot wide approach be extended 50 feet from the curb. In addition, the drive approach is not to be constructed on Haven Avenue until a right-of-entry document has been obtained fr„m the adjoining property owner. E. Gradina Committee: The Grading Committee approved the conceptual grading plan subject to approval of a final grading plan. F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed y t e app scant and is attached for your review. Staff completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the construction of the project. III . FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed in the attached Resolution were supported by the following facts: o The proposed building design and site plan are inconsistent with the current development standards of the City. o The proposed building design and site plan is not consistent with past Planning Commission policy related to the Haven Avenue corridor. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for environmental review in The Daily Report newspaper. 3;r ' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84-09 - Bates (Ashwell-Hawkins) Page 5 V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny the proposed development due to inconsistencies related to the intent of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and past Planning Commission policy related to the Haven Avenue corridor. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez -� Cit Planner !ZG:FD-ns ; t �. Attathments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Elevations s Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Denial �-s t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFOR•MATICN SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental ASS:SSment Review Fee: $87. 00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Rev'_ew Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet 'and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public reeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three deter-"-n_ations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report shoula be supplied by the applicant giving further infor-na- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: F-AVEN C0',V_'10E CEENTER APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Chris Bates 301 North Rarm art "C" Oran g,—Califorria_ f714) 4-4 SS3 -Q= F3 NAPE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO 3E COh'TrCTED CONCERNING 17HIS PROJECT* Chris Bates - 301 north Ra mart "C" Oranee,`California (714� 634-_558 g7lo.ob LOZATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. ) Sr Cn=n ,r of Haven and 7rF, Srrepr 't -- ar�rir ac ar rl,'c r' APf` "09 4i1 01 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERUMITS: None at this time 'i �lT-1 I� a i PROJECT DESCRIPTION i DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Dro'ect consists of r7rn air^le story buildings totaling 90 1RG sn Cnnst-m-rri nn ui 11 he r;1r-„n concrete with Riverro k rnl„mnc and nlanters. The llrnj nrr „ill } ayn extensive landsCaDing. ACRE—AGE OF PROJECT ARFZ& AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND P&OPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 9t -)IS �n ft of l � DESCRIBE THE ENVI:R0MMAENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES, , At:IMAI,S, M.Y CUTT,TURA.L, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND ThF. DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRULMURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : The project site is within the Haven Cwm rep cenrer. a nasror planned_ mixed use business community deyelonedby r� a;ll�r-F ;Ar•/ l ;a^r T ^, The lot is finished -114, d h t Ai eemnle a the topography is level and there are no plants or animals to be affectee!_ 1.c r•,� do�.elnp-err Tlnprp nrp no ^•jrnr^l t,;ct^riral nr scerir acne ty_ ap rticular to this Droperty The Dronerty is bordered by Haven and 7th and su,-nunding proverry is vacant at this ti-e. There are no existing structures. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? 40 1-2 -7 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial cha: ;e in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. ) ? _x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X S. Remove any existing trees? How many? 6. Create the need for use or disposr.l of potentially hazardous materials st.ch as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above : IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements Furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of ry knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information ,nay be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Re i w Committee. Date March 5. 1984 Signature {lr-14- = L'` t el f� Title ?roiec- Manaeer t: O 1-3 - » �- TABULATIONS �/�A nlnl I � I i i ITI �• �� -t i i fWC r�Y tmin �� RMY Tbf TNO�n _ Map nrGRm _ �� ✓Llbro I +wftatwsrr saes I SrM PLAN it \ORTH CITY or ® RANCHO CUC-k.`IO-NCT,-"IL TITLE: PLANNI\G DIVISIC N I .\I IIMT- SC:1LE= f�' 7 t t^ i e � i # I i - a• 3 r Y`� 1 CITY Or- IT El.t: W RANCHO C- C-"1O,\(;A TITLE: PLANNNG DIX'ISIO.Ni LXIIIBfi: - SCALE ley—/D -'' ; f I � -1 � � � •� •I 1 r Pi ANT L;ST I TREESITT ! r uar+.r..,aa.vouw ,..wr ^ a COW SHRUBS GROUND COVER ESirtER TREES 6 OROUND COVER •�• %Fast , Y rum — u. r, r: ,i NORTH CITY rY OF ITEM: R:� Cc� CLc->.`xc��c�� TITS: PL- NNI\G DIVOOV lAl111u: SCUE: f RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DE"TYING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84-09 - BATES LOCATED ON 'THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND 7TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PART: (SUBAREA 6) DISTRICT WHEREAS, or, the 1st day of May, 1984, a complete application was filed by Chris Bates (Ashweil/Hawkins) for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of May, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Com ii sion resolved as follows: 1. That the proposed project is not consistent with the intent objectives of the Industrial Area Sperit . Plan; and 2. That the proposed project is not in accord with the objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and ® 3. That the proposed project is not consistent with Planning Commission policies relative to the Design and Development of the Haven Avenue corridor. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23rd DAY OF MAY, 19L°. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.A BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: _ Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary E Resolution No. Page 2 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of May, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c�yc"4 STAFF REPORT C �O Ui > DATE: May 23, 1984 1977, T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission { FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: BASE LINE MEDIAN DESIGN I. BACKGROUND: In accordance with the Conditions of Approval, Lewis Homes has prepared landscaping construction plans for the Base Line median island, Exhibit "A". Because of the importance of this median as a community design element, Staff is seeking Planning Commission review and consideration of the proposed design. II. ANALYSIS: The primary purpose of the median island is to control traffic along Base Line by prohibiting indiscriminate and haphazard turn movements. The General Plan encourages use of the median ® island as an urban design resource by designing it aesthetically through creative use of hardscape and landscape treatment. The landscaping adds aesthetic character that softens the impact of new development. The Community Design section of the General Plan specifically discusses the function and character of the median island. "When possible, median landscaping should be provided along major divided arterials. Such landscaping should be scaled according to the size of the roadway and the importance of the route. Major views from the roadway should be enhanced and emphasized by the landscaping. Plant materials should not obscure views." (Page 146) The -arkway tree planting guidelines in the General Plan propose large columnar evergreens to reflect the rural history and image of the Eucalyptus windrows. The landscaping supplement for Terra Vista designates Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Red Gum) as the appropriate parkway tree. However, the General Plan made no specific recommendation as to the type or tree variety to be used in the median. The Terra Vista landscape supplement has established the following criteria: DIEM i i4 2 i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Base Line Median Design Page 2 Median should be planted with distinctive trees that will lend identity to the streets. To promote views of the mountains and other features, median trees should generally be deciduous. Ornamental flowering varieties are preferred, no larger than medium sized, so as to no-.- overwhelm the street." Specifically, the Terra Vista landscape supplement proposes the Koelreuteria paniculata (Goldenrain tree) as the Base Line median tree to highlight views of the City's central park and the mountains without blocking them. The Goldenrain tree is a fairly small (20 to 35 feet), deciduous tree which is covered with spikes of bright yellow flowers in summer. The flowers are followed by buff colored seed pods, which ornament the tree well into the winter after the leaves fall . The Goldenrain's long deciduous period and open branching (particularly when intergrowth is pruned) make it a good choice for this excellent view location. The proposed construction drawings indicated 15 gallon Goldenrain trees planted 20 feet on center, and underplanted with Oleander and Natal Plum shrubs. In addition, the median design is proposed to include the stamped concrete pattern resembling alluvial granite stone which is also used along the Haven Avenue median. A conventional shrub spray head irrigation system is proposed. Staff recommends that soil moisture tensiometers be included, as required along Haven Avenue median, which ' measures moisture of soil to control adequate watering. Staff conducted a detailed analysis of 75 street trees suitable for this area and climate. Each tree was reviewed in terms of: (1) low maintenance, (2) moderate to fast growth rate, and (3) a tolerance for drought, heat, smog, and wind. Attached as Exhi::it "C" is a list of trees meeting this criteria that would ,)e appropriate for median planting. The Goldenrain tree was rat included because of its slow to moderate growth rate. However, the Goldenrain tree is particularly suited to this area in to ,is of cold, heat, drought, wind, and soil tolerance. Therefore, Staff has no objection to the Goldenrain tree being used as a median tree on Base Line Avenue. III . 7 IENDATION: It is recommended that the Commission approve the pr. sed median concept subject to providing soil moisture tensiometers. a I . Respectfully submitted: Rick ,Gomez City; Planner PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Base Line Median Design Page 3 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "S" - Landscaping Construction Plan Exhibit "C" - Tree List Exhibit "D" - Photograph of the Goldenrain tree • M — o--��\ 114 • !NC M —` Y Ty- LM oo0P••q :oeowwooeso•o•oo•oowo�;, N��• .°�e+setx"°..; o ee0000eca•r1 0 o•000-eoeeoo, . .n 123 � : : ir14 LM M IC \ - , _ MH � M �••� LM •• f' M LM • e: P O O LM •. LM 00 P._ E Q a,d E !M •• e ELM O. M f `�H + -"�a�efYirf�s • •tcu�•�� — = t s O O • •� JrH :;ear*"�% -��a�rO�,O Jr r•""•� Ci o' I _o M 1.- �.j • r M r . ' [ LM 0 - 'p li. p: . i .1 LM i OP f "lu"tlV�r1w�i LM 1 p„ 01 E' i rI OP ••�, '.', Qi, E••j..,, �� 1 • 144 . . L� E u MH •+. o •._. J :: os"� y • r °! H : : h ►dH O\ .•J` M .. � Lu : I OF 0 Ilk cc OP ± f/"�`oj OP 6'IFC MO MAC 4 HO S e .o /�!G�\ �i ; •e�•oo•9•••1e• o�e 00000 NPPeo•ooPoeee eoee 0. / r 1 .00 ■w - --- _- - — — _- — 10 ooe0000•- o�Coe,9••e•Po• �o ?C1 —il SPECIAL LANDSCAPING TREATMENT DESCRIBED IN FOOTHILL GUIDELINES FIGURE IV-1 Landscape Plan 0ae0e0 COLUMNAR TREES A T PERIMETER P GREENWAY AND TRAIL -,)A).. • ® LOOP—OPEN EFFECT A ORNAMENTAL MEDIAN TREE Y MAJOR GATEWAY ® LOOP—ARBOR EFFECT SECONDARY GATEWAY OCOO COLUMNAR TREES FRAMING SPECIAL GATEWAY MOUNTAIN VIEWS INFORMAL PLANTING IN CLUSTERS STREET TREES VARYING rVL%—_-r7 WITH NEIGHBORHOOD Seale in feet too0 1500 FORTH CITY OF ITE:.1- ��U �J e�- A&ooi, RANCHO CUC._"'IO`:GA TITLE:I.00A 0N) MA-P � PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: �_SCALE: •'1 r� � .7i� d ' NORTli 14, l � 1, EXHIBIT "C" TREES SUITABLE FOR MEDIANS Deciduous or Evercreen Common Name Botanical D Name E Italian Alder Silver Dollar Gum Alnus Cordata E Eucalyptus Semi - p Desert Gum E. Rudp Poly anthomos D Jacaranda sus E Crape Myrtle Jacaranda Acutifolia E Flax leaf Paperhark Lagerstroemia Indica E Pink Melaieuca "Ielaleuca Linariifoiia E CaJeput Tree M- Nesophila E Chinese Plotinia M. Quinquenervia D Canary Island P?ne Photinia Serrulata D London Plane Tree Pinus Canariensis Platanus Acerfolia Chinese Scholar Tree phora Japonica 4 ✓� .I �� •.��>iF may.�'�,= 1'•f+�.�� •'vmi,�j'„yx,,.��' >r• JIr4. 4 10, Z lam' ~'•J 1I A~ u�, / �� ` v ref t rC'va1 e a J` - '�,a• `� ? ,l+Li�� '� ��' -: 'tit• ^��F� �; t't$. �i �• .ram(�'� \ r t$+� qi 1',:: �' ./ a w•D,.-• ! • _. ' -. i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1V�I''MORANDLM � o�9y DATE: May 23, 1984 Iz TO: Chairman and Members of thk PPl'anning Commission t9� FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner l SUBJECT: CARYN DEVELOPMENT I i Staff is in the process of preparing a report on the design issues for the above-described project. This report will be delivered to the Commission on Monday, May 21. Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call . 111jr i ITEM J