Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/07/11 - Agenda Packetc I a C. T"a m n z �c a a r n t; n cl � rn � D � Z Z Z J n co O A y z OR O Z G�.CA.tr� A. CITY OF RAINCHO CL O 10 \GA •�- vilRANTNI`;G CO %Ll,IISSION F �jZ AGENDA 1977 WEDNESDAY Jt11y 11, 1984 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 SASE i.II1E RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ACTIONS L Pledge of Allegiance IL Roll Call Commissioner Barker X Commissioner Chitiea X Commissioner `JlcNiel X M. Announcements Approved 5 -0 -0 IV. Consent Calendar NJ .41 Commissioner Rempel X Commissioner Stout = The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversiaL They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10414 - LANDCO - A proposed custom lot subdivision of 10 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District into 17 lots located south of Carrari Street and west of Haven Avenue - APN 201- 101-17. B. �vo PROPERTIES - The division of 33.7 acres into 12��r.�rmuivr Industrial Use located north of 4th Street at Scu to Ac Anita Avenue. C. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -18 - JASKA - The development R two l2 warehouse buildings totaling 34,475 sq. ft. on 2.34 acres of land in the Gerferal Industrial District (Subarea 4) and General Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 5), located at 9155 Archibald Avenue - APN 209 - 211 -12. V. Public Hearings Denied 4-1 -0 D. Approved 5-0 -0 w/ E. modification to den- sity, fence /landscaping and school access. Approved 5 -0 -0 w/ F. modification to arch style in 733 series and mix of roofs to include tile for 5000 sq. ft. lots. Approved 5 -0 -0 G. Approved 5 -0 -0 H. The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. - LiNuuLri - ine oevelopment of zuu cona07111mum unis on is.ii acres of land in the Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du/ac) District located on the northwest corner of 19tn Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202 - 101 -21 and 22. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12721 raW viGia, [1HIL1L 04JE4 a rIVIU .a NORTHERN - A total development and a subdivision of 19.4 acres into 4 lots to allow the development of 270 units in the Medium Residential District, generally located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue and north of Arrow Highway - APN 208 - 241 -02 ac 14. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT dwellings on 215 lots ranging from 3,700 sq. ft. to 10,450 sq. ft. on 39.7 acres of 'and, generally located on tha northeast corner of Haven and Baseline - APN 202- 221 -11 do 24. CONDITIONAL USE PER;vfiT 84 -11 - KLUMPP - A request to operate a children's gymnastic class private school) in an existing industrial facility, lease space is approximately 2,000 sq. ft., on 1.9 acres in the General Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 5) located at 9634 Tuner Avenue - APN 210 - 071 -43. :NTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8597 - LULlk.A C ;UKr. - A oit7Slon of 37.75 acres within the General industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 2) into 2 parcels located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue between 9th Street and Arrow - APN 209 - 102 -61. Approved 5-0 -0 I. REVISIONS TO TRACT MAP 12490 - AMERICAN NATIONAL - A request for phasing change of the previously approved condominium" development of 1 lot on 6 acres to 5 lots on 6 acres on east side of Vineyard Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard - APN 208 - 241 -11. Vi. New Business Approved 5-0 -0 J. ENVIRDN'tvlENTAL ASSESSMINT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW w/ Bldg. design to come 84 -15 - REIT.ER - The development of two 40,000 sq. ft. back to D. R. and Consent office /warehouse structures on 18 acres of land in the Industrial Calendar for approval Park District (Subarea 16) generally located west of Archibald Avenue, south of 6th Street - APN 210- 062 -31. VII. Directors Reports Concurred K. Windrows Park. Concept Development Plan Concurred L. haven Avenue Design Guidelines Concurred M. Sign Amortization Program VII. Public Comments This is the time and piece for the gene: ui public to address the Commission. items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. UL Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. fUUrpxG -LU�V� fCVrf• nEUUru VAY¢ / 0M'AP1O SkrER ATJOP1L AO nr CITY OF RAncHO cucA ,q CITY OF RANCHO CL:G1NI0 \CA \' � IING CO1 NMISSIQN 1977 WEDNESDAY July 11, 1984 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA L Pledge of Allegianx IL Roll Call Commissioner Barker Commissioner Chih2a_ Commissioner `ldcNiel M. Announcements IV. Consent Calendar Eck Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Stout The following Consent Calendar items are expected £a be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any iterr., it should be remc ccd for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10414 - LANDCO - A proposed custom lot subdivision of 10 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District i -to 1'i lots located south of Carrari Street and west of Haven Avenue - APN 201- 101-17. B. TIME EXTENSION F�- ? PARCEL MAP 56E PROPERTIES - The division o 33.7 acres in Industrial Use located north of 4th Street Avenue. at Santa Anita C. DEVELOPMENT REVMW 84 -18 - JASKA - The development Of two 2 warehouse buildings totaling 34,475 sq. ft. on 2.34 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) and Genera,'. Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 5), located at 8.55 Archibald Avenue - AP 209 - 211 -12. V. Public Bearings The f0U0wir:g items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by statird your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. D. ENI IRONYMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12597 - LINCOLN - The development of 200 condominium units on 11.11 acres of land in the Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du/ac) District located an the northwest currier of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202 - 101 -21 and 22. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSM214T AND TENTATIVE i.vnznzniv) - a total aevelopment antl a sundivision of 19.4 acres into 4 lots to allow the development of 270 units in the Medium Residential District, generally located or. the east side of Vineyard Avenue and north of Arrow Highway - APN 208 - 241 -02 do 14. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSISENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12590 - LEWIS - A residential development of 215 single family detached dwellings on 215 lots ranging from 3,700 sq. ft. to 10,450 sq. ft. on 39.7 acres of land, generally located on the northeast corner of Haven and Baseline - APN 202 - 221 -11 & 24. G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -11 - KLUMPP - A request to operate a children's gymnastic class private school) in an existing industrial facility, lease space is approximately 2,000 sq. ft., on 1.9 acres in the General Lidustrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 5) located at 9634 Turner Avenue - APN 210 - 071 -43. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8597 - LOZIER CORP. - A division of 37.75 acres within the General Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 2) into 2 parcels located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue betweer. 9th Street and Arrow - APN 209 - 102 -01. I. REVISIONS TO TRACT MAP 12490 - AMERICAN NATIONAL - A request for phasing change of the previously approved condominium development of 1 lot on 6 acres to 5 lots on 6 acres on east side of Vineyard Avenue. south of Foothill Boulevard - APN 208 - 241 -11. _ •- s, -- s; LT 1 J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -15 - REITER - The development of two 40,000 sq. ft. office/warehouse struetnaes on 18 acres of land in the ind_ tr'al Park District (Subarea 16) generally located west of Archibald Avenue, south of 6th Street - APN 210 - 062 -31. VII. Director's Reports K. Windrews Psuk Concept Development Plan L. Haven Avenue Design Guidelines M. Sign Amortization Program VUL Public Comments ?'his i3 the time and place for the general p',ablic to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. UL Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. ~. i. - �� : • - _' ice. ObtARIC INYER.anOHLL AJB RT' CITY OF RAMW CUCAW*oG„t► 11 E r1 CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA. STAFF REPORT DATE: July 11, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10414 - LANDCO - A proposed custom lot subdivision eft acres of land in the Very Low Residential district ilito 17 lots located south of Carrari Street and west of Wiven Avenue - APN 201 -101- 17. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a two -year time extension Tor Tentative Tract 10414, as describ:d above. The project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on September 8, 1982 and currently expires on September 8, 1984. The developer is requesting the maximum time extension that may be granted for this map. All lots within this tract riust be recorded prier to the expiration date. II. ANALYSIS: Since the approval of t:iis project, the Development Code was adopted. Therefore, in order to consider a time extension, this project was reviewed for conformance with the Development Code requirements. Based upon this review, the following are the inconsistencies: 1. Minimum net average lot size - 22,500 square foot lot size is required versus 20,733 square foot minimum net average lot size provided. 2. Minimum corner lot. width - a 100 -foot lot width is required for corner lots. Lot 13 varies in width from 75 feet to 97 feet. 3. Minimum frontage - a 50 -foot minimum frontage is required at the front property line. Both Lots 9 and 10 on Street "B" have a 4:: -foot lot frontage. These inconsistencies are not considered to be significant and changes would not significantly alter the appearance or function of the project. ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tine Extension - Tentative Tract 10414 July 11, 1984 Page 2 III. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends a final extension of two- ;years. In granting the final extension, the Planning Commission is finding under Section 17.02.020 C -7 that subdivision and development of this property pursuant to the tentative tract map which was approved pursuant to tie provisions of an earlier ordinance of the City, and which is in conflict with the Development Code, may be continued and completed in accordance with the provisions of the approval, provided it is completed within the time limit in effect at the time of its approval. RespeEtfuiiy,,submitted, ty Planner DC:jr Attachments: Letter from September 8 Exhibit "A" Exhibit "8" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" S t Applicant Requesting Extension 1984 Planning Commission Staff Report - Location Map - Approved Tract Map - Conceptual Grading Plan - Master Plan ep ember 8, 1934 Planning Commission Minutes Resolution of Approval with Conditions Time Extension Resolution of Approval (21 - °1' 11 E- 150 S. E1 Molino, Suite 101 PASADENA, CA 91101 (213) 449 -2622 Jung 20, 1984 1 16 �� City of Rancho Cucamonga CiiY OF r3^pd� } {r..f1i ^, TONGA Planning Division GONIMUNiTYCrv;!OPUrNTDEpT P.O. Sox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 JUN 2 2 1984 Attention: Dou Coleman 7'S�9oi0�i1�12tI ;2t3t�t� 6 Reference: Time Extension for Tentative Tract 10414 1 Dear Mr. Coleman: Pursuant to our telephone conversation, today, we are submitting a request for a time extension of two years for the validity of our tentative tract 10414 together with the fee of '62.00. Due to economic forces beyond our control the demand for half acre custom lot home sites has not developed sufficiently to support proceedin with the project at this time. Our intent is to proceed at the earliest opportunity and will do so when the ma.ket will support the development. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. DRH:jr Enclosure El Sincerely, LANDCO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Donald R. Hornbeck President Q -3 C r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 8, 1982 - TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Assoicate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATTVE TR LAND CO - A proposed custom lot subdivision land in the R -1- 20,000 zone into 17 lots Carrari Street, west of Haven Avenue - APN OT iut acres of located south of 201 - 101 -17. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a residential custom lot subdivision of 17 lots in the R -1- 20,000 zone, located south of Carrari Street and west of Haven Avenue (Exhibit "A "). The property is presently vacant and slopes from the north to the south at approximately a 7% to 8% grade. The project site is bounded on the north by an existing flood control ditch and vacant land, on the west by vacant agricultural) land, on the south by existing single family homes and on the east by vacant land proposed for a church site. ANAYLSIS: This project has been reviewed by the Design Review, Growth Management, Grading and Equestrian Advisory Committees. The major concern of these Committees was grading and drainage, paticularly on lot G. As shown on the Conceptual Grading Plan, Exhibit '"D ", maintaining the natural contours on lots 1 -5 results in a substantial slope at that corner of lot G. The Grading Committee has worked with the applicant to a point where the drainage problem has been adequately resolved with the adoption of the attached condition. The attached Master Plan, Exhibit "0 ", indicates the lot patterns of surrounding properties and the potential for future subdivisions. The existing reservation for highway purposes at the north tract boundary will become a public street to connect from Haven to Hermosa. This street will also provide tha optimum situation for drainage as opposed to a drainage easement. There °ore, the subdivision design was dictated by surrounding land uses and street Patterns. All other concerns and issues of these Committees are reflected in the Tentative Tract Map, Exhibit "C ", and Conditions of Approval. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. l - "T E Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract No. 10414 - Landco Planning Commission Agenda September 8, 1982 Pane 2. FACTS OR FINDINGS: The subdivision map has been prepared in accordance with city standards and policies. The project site is suitable for the proposed subdivision, and the design of this project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. CORRESPONDENCE: A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Daily Report newspaper and approximately 15 notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval, then the adoption of the attached RE.;;,' -,tion and issulnce of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectf -ml lyo'GSmi tied, RICK 40MEZ' City jPlanner RG /DC /kep ;Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Subdivision Map Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Master Plan Part I Initial Study Resolution Conditions of Approval of -s .r . t' - � � f Ll VACANT % -1-36 I, T` mc9 ors �•�� i I 1 .\ I I 6.Lt Y? I !Jt "V�U/r I LJ3Jf Y•Y i 401f }I y.� •�� is �� q \ tClAfpT lriVYI! 'L'•Ji j (/ VACANT 1 R -1 -3P r 1 �1 A i Lana ce�r � /ti !� .a A nsw cow 1 ��� lMrlo colt r Y- CITRi19l SOWo E FAMtI RMDEN AL cotavi i PARCEL YAP 4=9 /� t• 1t �, fO fs 90 /r \ \mow 9 t�� .cmar � �l arcs to n� i t VACANT 1 x -1-30 1 1 PARCEL MAP 3361 CITY OF RANCHO CLCN ."VIO GA PLANNING DIN ISION .�OirfH TIi�:G NOR SCINLE O -% MOTMA '�Fv a y gar una �� 1Y CITY OF RA\CHO CL'C t,IO\OA PL.A: \NI_ -NG DI \'LS:3.N i_ L — - =9 "o- , i LJ ii -x l: E.\IilrZr SCALE: m NNORTH I � I •A 1 - -jl -lo It . \ 0 C I I I — I laru o vacs CITY OF RANCHO CL;CVN,IG. - sA PLANNING DR2SKYN 1 C \] NORTH FILM: 'PIn.E= E.\i m3m _ _ SG' +'� r a -t? ® Commissioner Stout asked why there is a requirement for sidewalks on 20,000 sauare foot lots. Mr. Rougeau replied that it is the interpretation of the sidewalk resolution that they be required on cna side of the street on collector streets even within the equestrian area. Commissioner Eemnel explained that the former Planning Commission had studied the sidewalk issue and adopted a resolution requiring side _lks on streets of this nature. He indicated that one of the factors that enters into this is that on north /south streets there will be a fair amount of water running in the gutters during rainy periods and that anyone walking will be at the mercy of the water. He indicated that the resolution was adopted to provide a safe route so that people would not have to walk in the streets. Commissioner Barker asked if on the southeast corner of the proposed street there iz a potential pocket for water gathering. Mr. Rougeau replied that it is; however, it goes under the sidewalk and is taken into the gu'.ter. Commissioner Barker asked what the pocket goes into. Mr. Rougeau replied that the whole cul-de -sac will drain into the south curb when the street is graded. He indicated that while they only have the preliminary grading plan, eventually this whole cul-de -sac will drain naturally to the west. Mr. Vairin asked if Commissioner Barker was referring to the cul-de -sac rather than lot 6. Mr. Barker stated that he was originally referring to the cul-de -sac and then lot 6. Pte. Vairin stated that the Grading Committee has required an equestrian trail as well as a drainage structure here. Commissioner Rempel asked if on the two lots in question there are any just below this tract on lots 40-41 that have no access to the street. M^. Rougeau replied that although it doesn't show on the map, Vi:•ienda Street goes all the way to Ridgeview and does have offers of dedication_. Further, there may be so=-- offers beyond lot 41 but at least before any permits or subdivisions can occur there the rest of it will be obtained. He indicated that the cul-de -sac has been eliminated and an S curve put in to provide access. Planning Commission Minutes -1U- September 8, 1982 i Motion.: Moveb by Barker, that the requirement for sidewalks be removea and,'r' that this Se continued for a two -week period. The motion dinC for lack of a second. Moved by Rempel, seconded by Mch'ie.l, carried tc adopt Resolution No. 82-80, approving Parcel Man No. 7545 wit:- the condition that the applicant meet wit." staff and the trail committee to insure-that - uestrian trail system have continuity through this area. rlu ther, that sidewalks not to required and that the sewage system be designed per the requirements o° the CLcamonga County dater District. �•- .r Mr. Vairin stated «,. -� at -� �� this shoul'i be done prior to the recordation of the parcel map. �. Chairman King voted no on t.h s matter indicating that his opposition has nothi-g to do with the parcel map, just that he was not comfortable with the resolution. * a * 7 :50"'P.m. The Planning Commission recessed i0 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened F- ENVIRONTZHENTAL ASSESS25ENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 10414 - ? custom lot subdivision o; 10 t 1N20, 0 A proposed 17 20�P000 zone into rots located south of Car.^ari, westiofafiaven Avenuel ' N 201 - 101 -17. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, ­viewed the sL:aff report. Chairman icing stated in terms _f the sidewalk issue and street impr:,rements to the south and improvement in the proposed tract, that it would seem that the same issues exist on this tract a:; the last one. He further stated that it does not make sense to put sidewalks in front of the lot when the rest of the street does not have sidewalks and he felt that the Commission should make a stand one way or the other to require them in both tracts or none. Michael Vairin replied that another alternative would be to go along the side because of the east lesser number of homes and make a requirement for the installation of sidewalks by each individual homeowner. He indic=ted that this could be controlled by virtue of the issuance of building permits. Mr. Vairin stated that sidewalks are already required on one side or the other on the southwest side and this issue should be resolved as to whether sidewalks should continue all the way to Hillside and whether it should be a requirement of this map or a statement by the Commission that they desire to have the continuation of the sidewalk on each individual lot as each lot is developed. Mr. Vairin stated that he did not believe there were any houses on the east side, Planni -ng Commission r4inutes -9_ September 8, 1982 C N Mr. Rougeau stated that 2 could be subdi that hapoens, 7ivierda would have to Chaff_ ^fin ° be extaaded. {irg opened the public hear:n enoug. Don 3orabeCk representing the applicant h. ns as rey,aired and that the enough. stated improvements to H= indicated Hillside. Commissioner one side, further that they must r t into 2 lots t• but net before that they would accept all Ricgevlew will be tough improve the gulley all the wav to 3empel stated to M_ ^, Hornbeck that sidewalk;; are required on the b Bing no further comments, the public hearirg was closed. Chairman King asked staf, i£ they have constructed on the east side idea _s. °j the tract lbelow about how many homes are where the present develc; :nt Mr. ?parr! :villiams, of p that the -ssoaiated On reathY Host Ofhill that is I, d$eV eHedirectBY isrthe the project, slated 11 Hillside. icated that lot 42 house on the corner shower on the sketch Chairman 'King is sidehe east de, would Williams assumin side g that he wit -n- He asked w n to have the individual el to put his hat can he lot sidewalk r� Rou- done about the owner put yis own Beau replied r house or. the corner, by the Cit ^ that the sideway coulavail y an assessment Y o. through funds be ins ? that are a -lea under Chair now suggested King asked if it makes sense able through a state progra , �£ it makes sense to to take the approach that improve it, as it relates to that the cis take improvements along Ridgeview 1.,y has Mr* piece of property, when t..ey sidewalk replied that this was the kind of a subjective tract fee ds:velo same expense whether i , Pment. t indicated t s done Ching as par the tract the condition on the developer that '20w or as tract abo. it beco�es a wart of the Putting sidewalks PS will be the M Jo at this time. flow inn, of whether to value. us in, it will ''or Pedestrian f1 Heated that the quite a few years before while they will be Commissi nap it will be of full sidewalks tout asked what the current lks on the cul- de_sac. the e- Sstated that he cal -d would interpret the sac. Plarn;ag Comy�ission Minutes _71_ Q -rz understanding is with respect to the the sidewalk re_.nlution to exclude September 8, 1982 0 E 1 `f. Cha -rman Xing asked if the Commission is in basic agreement t at the sidewalks should be done on a lot -by -lot basis. The Commission indicated that they would be in agreement with this concept. Commissioner Rempel asked if the developer would participate in a reimbursement agreement if the sidewalk was put in. Mr. Rougeau replied that he did not know. Commissioner Rempel asked if it would be any different t^an a storm drain agreement. Mr. Rougeau stated that the requirement for improving the street to the full width is a drainage requirement more than anything else. He indicated that if the sidewalks were to be treated that way there would have to be a sidewalk reimbursement agreement. Commissioner Rempel stated that the owner of the property should be made to do it and that he would be able to use the 1911 Act. Mr. Hopson stated that the only time the City enters into a reimbursement agreement as such is when a tract has provided what the City's Ordinance and state statute refers to as supplemental capa� -Jty. He indicated that if there is an improvement that has been done offsite and has not been done for the project to provide larger storm drains or sewers offsite, it is common to enter into a reimbursement agreement. He indicated that in this case, the paving of Ridgeway down from Hillside does not provide supplemental capacity to anything and would not be aapropr - -ate as a reimbursement agreement. Commissioner Rempel stated that he was not thinking of this as far as paving is concerned. Further, that there is nothing in the sidewalk that helps him out whatsoever. He felt that sidewalks should come from the development fee. Mr_ Rougeau stated that there would be no problem from an Engineering standpoint but vie would have to check to see if this could be handled under the Systems Development Fee. The consensus of the Planning Commission was that this should be looted into. The applicant stated that if the cost of the sidewalks were able to come from the Systems Development Fees, it would not affect them at all. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt P.esol:iioa No. 82 -c , issuing a :Negative Declaration and approving Tentative Tract 5o. 10414 adding the condition that the sidewalk cost be recovered from the Systems Development fee for that one lot. Mr. Vairin asked if the condition cannot be satisfied, should this item come back to the Commission. Planning Commission .tiLnutes -12- September 8, 1982 0-/3 The consensus of the Commission was that if the condition could not be satisfied, the applicant would not 'nave to put the sidewalk in. G. CONDITIOY.AL USE PERMIT NO. 82 -16 - WALL - The establishment of an arcade n the C -1-5 zone to be located at 9687 Base Line in the Base Lire V.l`age Shopping Center. City Planner, Rick Gomez, reviewed the staff report. He indicated that the staff repert`'advised that a letter would be forthcoming from the Alph Beta Corporation; however, none had been received. Commissioner Barker-.asked if these conditions are identical to those placed on the other arcade. t Mr. Gomez replied that they are. Commissioner Rempel asked ii' -this could be brought back to the Commission after six months to be sure that the applicant was conducting his business in accordance with the parameters of.the conditional use permit. Mr. Gomez replied that this could be•.done. Commissioner Stout asked if there was a requirement for additional restrooms. Mr. Gomez replied that there are. ~• Chairman King opened the public hearing. elr% Ron 'Walls, 5081 Via Paraiso, Alta Loma, stated that the only condition that he would have a problem with is the requirement for two restrooms. He further indicated that the Barro's Pizza in the same shopping center has no such requirement. Mr. Walls stated that this would create a hardship for hi.m.because of the cost of installing another restroom. ; Chairman icing asked Mr. walls if he had any knowledge of what %, waiting time is going to be for his patrons. .t^. Malls stated the he did not know. Commissioner Stout stated that in his letter, the applicant has indicated his intent of keeping his establishment open until midnight. M_r. Walls replied that that had been a typographical error and that the 1� operating hours would be until 9:30 p.m. on Sunday and 10:30 during the week. ' E Planning Commission Minutes -13- September 8, 1982 a �y E u RESOLUTION NO. 82 -87 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10414 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10414 hereinafter "Map" submitted by Landco Development, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the ' -ity of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California. described as a custom lot subdivision of 10± acres of land into 17 lots, rec, :larly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on September 8, 1982; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10414 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substart;al environmental damage and avoidable injury -imans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, ® now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. r Resolution No. A Page 2 SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10414 a copy of which is attached fieret- o s hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The approval shall become null and void if the final subdivision map is not approved and recorded within twe:ity four (24) months from the approval of this project uniess an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. BUILDING & _,',FETY DIVISION 2- Prcvide drainage structures for interception of surface drainage from equestrian /drainage easement along westerly boundary and from lots 3,4, and 5; said drainage to be conducted to safe location for disposition satisfactory to the City Engineer and Building Off;cial. 3. The rough grading plan shall be completed and approved by the Grading Committee prior to recordation of the final .ubdivisio, map. ENGINEERI"JG DIVISION 4. Developer shall construct the following items along Ridgeview Avenue from the tract boundary southerly to Hillside Road: curb and gutter along the west side including drive approaches; curb and gutter along the east side including drive approaches only at the locations where a residential development currently exist; and all pavement including a minimum 26 -foot wide pavement where curb and gutter does not exist on the east side. Sidewalk installation on presently developed property shall be credited toward system development fees. 5. Developer shall provide a drainage Swale along the north shoulder of Hillside Road from Ridgeview Avenue westerly to Hermosa Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. Developer shall provide a rolled entrance at Ridgeview Avenue and Street "A ", and any necessary drainage devices at the intersection of Hillside Road and Ridgeview Avenue. 7- Developer shall construct a drainage device at the west end of Street "A" to drain the runoff to the existing drainage channel to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (9 416 16 11 11 11 I] r i Resolution No. Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1982. PLANNING COMY- 4SSLON OF THE CITY, OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s BY: ss',on I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of ti-.e City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of September, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: McNiel, Rempel, Barker, Stout, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None a-i7 O O w v 0 Y s 0 O O 0 O _o e t 4 r C - O u � u G L V n t V l < L _V V > n_ c. Na 9 ` C v q V y V � G L J _ O r � G � C Gc - v _ v G � -• O � My d L J d - o u > L M- a 4 > C O E r c p� �N o < c 4 V •n p G c Ili C G �q O o O v V C i 4 v W V r hi S W 6 L a O 0 O C C V Q V �o Y C a r n _ V 9 i v > b . oAw `O < p O � V C ` c P J V y v � O C .n O _ O C Y J < p C Y O r q < c � J b H O i c b t C I b o= i C N � N � P C .. � � L v q C S C J L J y Vf C M y L O 4 y q w y' n q G V _ C �rO y 4 q. 7 ✓ r r u U � � u C y y 4 C J y G O O aa m CN,C i _n u r N 4 o O y S V r C l U Z Q i y C i C N ' � I U s v ° 0 4 e = O r V c c r O V O V C C � v V i A < C q O C ° G r b >o 9 P C A C - q M d U � � O yf� OI y <i V i O fr O - C O TCU y �N r L ° z f v V n O L y O p - r _ q C 2 P q it oc C G q C O y u h c V ry N N I �! _4 y � r u o P y C 4p n_ -r q c " c o 2 = i G A r O O 6 you S C NoL q � Goo O� J 4 c C L 9 � T u t Q L y M L V 4 a -�P <.0 T c o V G V c V O f r L - p O S \G O y V e m c 4L G r� � \V 4 V U 4 y =u n v C' � •J c q - G C O dL O: V � r N y L P. r O .n �ac<� � y C V4<G A _V r � tz LL 5•y..•c..°. `coin ^o C OL OCq�VO LI T N N o 0 O v V 9- V N r P r � 9 r - a _C O i b _ P -e M E t c Y e < qy A e O = � V r V � N qL P c. _ N Y o_ S d C 4 O r = C L O V L nq 4 4 C C E C C L V U U r r 4 4 v o 9 > z Ez; V> t -�v v C O> J = C Q L t p b < r G= _ GCS• N r Q S C L V a J cp rTO .22 N� = ° q e. L � bP 4 L L O r C P o _ Jy O u. -< t J O 4 L ` rlN �n�P MV dt� Lm ^�C -�O OHO OW OV G> Oq� _4 y � r u o P y C 4p n_ -r q c " c o 2 = i G A r O O 6 you S C NoL q � Goo O� J 4 c C L 9 � T u t Q L y M L V 4 a -�P <.0 T c o V G V c V O f r L - p O S \G O y V e m c 4L G r� � \V 4 V U 4 y =u n v C' � •J c q - G C O dL O: V � r N y L P. r O .n �ac<� � y C V4<G A _V r � tz LL 5•y..•c..°. `coin ^o C OL OCq�VO LI T N N o 0 O v V 9- V N r P r � 9 r - a _C O i b _ P -e M E t c Y e < qy A e O = � V r V � N qL P c. _ N Y 6 cn C6 LL _^ vd -n v> V u O aN �v.0 q- - � O q C I �- V v ^ p0 V N O o �L 7° soc4p i' j d r �r V.••G GN Y N C r 4 G •� 4 4� C< r O C r O r w C i C S nq 4 4 C C E C C L V U U r r 4 4 i C V y O f T d •_n C " ✓� O H O L� wa _ GJq Es cr ° o •` o .-.i e C q r d '� ✓ l ✓ O � S w C C7 o cv wu c °.� ... .Or Y .. ✓ Lc <.r C V I IO L ✓- •- C .Vn L `_ .- r'F, V tip -mac V6 u•d 70 C`>. l ✓C L .0 � 9u b �T' r OC yC N F ..`' � � � _ n= q G' T L r C. T � 1] �✓ w T i O_ a.. C' q O _ .c T c+ 1 r w O e� O O � � G G __✓ L .T. .} b C V O v_ } 9 i V C !J C I C C ` O ✓ O G d I O �+ d C C N` V S L u V w - LC(.. 6 Lja _ y c']• M •Ln � 9Y. iq T � L�+ r_q✓ y + .- ✓ s O L I C 4 C G� qi_l �CY v� _d O O. GC Cl d_w� d rCO M1y4E � M L 9GL d cL � Cw rq q •I (r - r c_..ywO n.' L ✓L t _w wCL ✓L `^N q q iC �� OT � 10 d ��.��aC +�� •. ..• � 2T, L v v b ✓ u ILO LT ^ r •n ✓ p i•�Q O 4C ld� ru ✓a r � L EV �L✓ U :p� I� ` CwG V9C�0 = M Sq •^ L` Or_ N r y 4C +LL t• qG b 4COSVC�V CCq IL GP9 .CrGG �C « t. T ✓ >qd r O Y C L w b V O ' UG Ir VL9 L C GOr• Ur_ u �� ' L P uL qYV Vlw N �. q r C- Cr � C C.> LC. C � > D G C S G .-. L b C IC � w ` � w= O O •.. O 9� o oM c ca c�, c _ cv m ° G E .u- �y•O L•-G. = le✓ °' o= -4.+w F Si V'a wOC q wI ✓C V 40 q hC� o• CiaLL>'O CL✓ GV ^E� Cb6 CnC, C_ I a `. O -_du Ou•u L I�dq .- a.�C[4iCG r� C w Crd `CC n} q' [Y .+ t � '�9 dd✓ C. I'MC N 4� .a Lqy Vr E . w d w _C T •w 0 OL �� O> O✓ > w C C C q q u _C � C O V L w ' Y S ^ L L !• - G � � Y I w V V C V w .. f- O d G •e •G-. � L - ' l I I N ~ _ G 0 ` ✓ O 9 4 l pp O p L O C L O 4 f? Z!2 • G C L v S C 9 nT _ bi _ q _✓ S CqV v. u w p O `L +C_gC9 9` w L P✓ S ,C .� � _ C C ✓ _ �. w wL E 6N ✓L_ � O. + q_pOC VV 70 y` w C G G O` C d_ L y G - L u w G ✓ �-` -- C •n .+ °u cn rGO q.=n r_ o o i• .r: c -� �4G o_ � = a-a � c C V V O A O `J q C `� ✓� � p >• V L 4_ C 4_ r y ✓ 9 O _� LC! •nL -y ^cr> LLd C r SPV `r �✓ C C C .'r = ✓j O L p✓ � "_ 4 ° M� ao aw�n9 b oa q _ «%9�>'iw"• srO a`.€ o cr `q i �� Y ✓�.,� b w- .q..�°p•c ewv 9tV c i9uG - -a G _uL _� G i✓ G 0 0_ E F. C L l 0 w •• 9 C= U C O Cw 9 a V•J,•b wJ G'• LLS Ory LN C nO PL Vr �✓r ry C .-Q S C� Op G w LyN✓ L E6 _w ✓rt T_ +C O= .n L. ri -.V••� qw 7 `G _ d Or dLVCr 9✓ `U LI C C V y � w` q O• V.2 q CC w N w Oq C ✓9 C� �.bi CCU CwG d(Y C9 ..-.9G Oq L_n Gqr _' G+ ' � � � a u ✓� �! m� _ Y� SFr C` qy -O re ....eO�cc uGVrr i c 0 ,'ec _ a 9 O _ V L - V a _ O 9 V 9 r 4 a O S d q Y ' C b e T > G r d - <. ✓ C Y 1 O - G •" t, °>' N -J .`. « v E L _ o V L v c E = L q u L L P C d ., q t L .q. �- C� _ ... w � V J S L- •V.. G✓ O C V _ q ov_ `EC9c r zz lL'_.G OC r� ✓O.v9 O.4i O L - `r w Vqq T -aON f^L GLS•,.O• q aL 47 ^r_JL ♦_w .d.. G� N9 4'OL r9 �.0.. •^n •~i. C L _ « r C r J b ✓ V L S t E r p -TT l F C- I ✓ G q^ c V 9 p q G L C '. S � M ^q `^ L- a L w r 69 L N C 'a O •- + L V F V L Y r 4 r C u O T L G✓ r L p - w O - O 1• r a: •• ca 4 g r r P C Y a• 4 a °Y m9 0C9 qb °y'c C`'c L5 .G.• e'. o G z ao� �✓ oo- c ,,, r `- ud -g'ce =� ne•o 4. _r-c N _L^e9_`q ..r CC SL �VO ... C V Z - O qd ✓n ,n` ✓ nw ELS C•`. dwp =CV�VL T r9 NL G � V-. rwr. �• ✓L r. d rCC✓ C- - 04. �..��= ��C•n C .- u O �. < l' G .- i •Or SC ZI C- • V T 6 L J 4 P✓ r O N q V w 6 w C C C < C. G ,_w .tn E C O L < a O 4 G w ^ � a S r• r P \` N r Oc V = --6E G. n t,3 CPC _ r iii j; 7 4J SO P I L �l LZ.°_ C rW G ^- G _ 4 = n n n V V C.y' --. _ p 1 II < y lri w d � 27 c G _ -c - C .r•�_ -- G' Oar Oro C_ _ rP-O �_ _ _ U r 2 9 - •j .n m _ - O 4 Q O a � - G r a r � _ Vii _ -1 Sc _��° cM ice` cc� T i �o o� °•4 —i 2v--c O - L r ET;.a -'� r= 2 u• r O - ^� n.- J U _ _� n. _J '� 2G ^` _OC -L. -ate:. ?c JO - --u .$' -„ '- -_m'� L ✓VL .°.v ^`^ a '-E C -_ dN -O c `S ZZ :5--- : - v: _ o r Laq =ice ..r-'o ...c c_ �JVa __' c' --ouu -TC ^.•: =[c r_ °_= - cr � --� [ -` c�� __T Lo aL7'.:T L - Jo y p S� o -_L -c cru -4 oc o_•• p ors p. -c .r zc im CI - a� ' i 4 o G + 9 P o w T•n > C 4- w oa Cr O C M •! 9 6 G - r ' = O E V � w J_ C � L G a o L C V r 7 l a tU+ � e` C rn p O - V � O O c O V d E c y L u 4 q_ T P 2 u o_ ru cL � o b o r L C r L.. O Sd ce T� 4 +o c u 4 L w 4 O Y - S 4 -V 0 _O P 0 r V d a4 i a c r V M c r ° r a � � h � E C L C• P4 - O 7 O rj � O U � - G V coo O 9 -'^ E 3 � > q O O 6 U r v v C C T ` O r r � � .°u p V L = o G L L � S _r - C G 3 i f O = O n O U r •J `oa c V q y V V = O D u c e•r q _ r O C J-r O vw S V `J 9 v r � c u U c C ' tL � O J w 3 L U v - c O ` >o O. L U 'J 9 < M V y U O o° .T. J. O 4 C J c O r f w p -J r F e U i u 4 u .L.. v ` z c O y `m b u 2 a - L - c u ' O O > S � � c` >b a �c -n Iq U w G r' q Icu• e•. u Iwo s-. G p V a 7 r n_ C O u V C > c� G I u 'U 1 ' V � > V w -] G La O w o r_ O u i r L .°r O i O � _ ry ri O N rl T. VTR u r � i � C v c n 9 - q —o cv`L L C p w V C r n G ' - C co `u9 O _ � -GV L q V V P •� 1 r - � M P72 v � r S yy� 1� o u 04 w 3 o v ` d r 9 Z �9 - i S ` C O Y r u � S C' O ^ ti M e y c G r G L O c a •J C E o> G G P 0 r O V ^ h P 1 C 1 pi C-� -i c uC ?C� I 2I K tz 1 r ` l T•r I SLL J v C +• D- emu° I G L I � o 4 c j ° G `r O I G L 0 nc _ V V � r '' L5 I L^ �^ T y u� C t �Y r O4 L C d C u ur > P w T i - 4 o� ^ L O •L- O �J C L U q w y V O L L 4 P C q P L O 0 V r C L P O _T O 6 D >'c 04� C T V J T P = C � w P C V 0 c O V O V L r v a C M ^ L w q O u Gr p _v C y i V C T G G O 7. � t0i - G w G v b q r t O � v ^ G C H - ` o D L ^ 2 '+ d •^ G � L O u 4 G C y U C r 9 q• =_ y P w �`� w V U V= • T� Ys �j T = r O V r 4 - T ^_Q� r O r V N4�G� NOOr GV L. u Vr� Mf rp - C P1 e y�L 4 � � w d aa> C q O r � -• C G - C q_ V V _ u c _ O w r L V l C'J •- O O V C Ot \Lrr 4 G rOrl wl M r 9 G .- C O 9I r• 9 cl q 14 I 1 of Y o G + 9 P o w T•n > C 4- w oa Cr O C M •! 9 6 G - r ' = O E V � w J_ C � L G a o L C V r 7 l a tU+ � e` C rn p O - V � O O c O V d E c y L u 4 q_ T P 2 u o_ ru cL � o b o r L C r L.. O Sd ce T� 4 +o c u 4 L w 4 O Y - S 4 -V 0 _O P 0 r V d a4 i a c r V M c r ° r a � � h � E C L C• P4 - O 7 O rj � O U � - G V coo O 9 -'^ E 3 � > q O O 6 U r v v C C T ` O r r � � .°u p V L = o G L L � S _r - C G 3 i f O = O n O U r •J `oa c V q y V V = O D u c e•r q _ r O C J-r O vw S V `J 9 v r � c u U c C ' tL � O J w 3 L U v - c O ` >o O. L U 'J 9 < M V y U O o° .T. J. O 4 C J c O r f w p -J r F e U i u 4 u .L.. v ` z c O y `m b u 2 a - L - c u ' O O > S � � c` >b a �c -n Iq U w G r' q Icu• e•. u Iwo s-. G p V a 7 r n_ C O u V C > c� G I u 'U 1 ' V � > V w -] G La O w o r_ O u i r L .°r O i O � _ ry ri O N rl T. VTR u r � i � C v c n 9 - q —o cv`L L C p w V C r n G ' - C co `u9 O _ � -GV L q V V P •� 1 r - � M P72 v � r S yy� 1� o u 04 w 3 o v ` d r 9 Z �9 - i S ` C O Y r u � S C' O ^ ti M e y c G r G L O c a •J C E o> G G P 0 r O V ^ h P 1 C 1 pi C-� -i c uC ?C� I 2I K tz 1 r ` l T•r I SLL J v C +• D- emu° I G L I � o 4 c j ° G `r O I G L 0 nc _ V V � r '' L5 I L^ �^ T y u� C t �Y r O4 L C d C u ur > P w T i - 4 o� ^ L O •L- O �J C L U q w y V O L L 4 P C q P L O 0 V r C L P O _T O 6 D >'c 04� C T V J T P = C � w P C V 0 c O V O V L r v a C M ^ L w q O u Gr p _v C y i V C T G G O 7. � t0i - G w G v b q r t O � v ^ G C H - ` o D L ^ 2 '+ d •^ G � L O u 4 G C y U C r 9 q• =_ y P w �`� w V U V= • T� Ys �j T = r O V r 4 - T ^_Q� r O r V N4�G� NOOr GV L. u Vr� Mf rp - C P1 V O 6 ::,z G 7 G r T r L C r G V rj o r cqu a .. 2 d - � F L` o f � � 7 4 O— w a � O L � n O � r _ i n a 0 � C n_L I .l l'7 E 9 T J i C _ eG o- V �r^.O 9 C O V L i L b S u_ n T' n y O J C 7 L ^t+4G 4 9 4 o _ 3 L II r � 7 6r�n� c _ v4 M �i is oo r c,. i m Esc n L C - O L P r w C J 1 - - v— r �l =6 �c S N I .l l'7 E 9 T J i C _ eG o- V �r^.O 9 C O V L i L b S u_ n T' n y O J C 7 L ^t+4G 4 9 4 o _ 3 L II 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10414 WHEREAS, a request has oeen filed for a time extension for the above- described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.83(b) of Ordinance 28 -8, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above- described Tentative Tract 10414. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga 'Planning Commission has made the following fi�ngs: A. That prevailing economic c�mditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects, B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to record the map at this time; C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Deve opment Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension�or: Tract Applicart Expiration 10414 Stephenson September 8, 1985 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11th DAY OF JULY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8Y: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I] -� 3 I, Rick 3omez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the C•ty of Rancho Lcamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 - QE/ El 0 11 E J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Juiv 11, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer °Y: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: T.IiME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 5697 - WESTMONT PROPERTIES - The division of 33.7 acres into 12 parcels for Industrial Use located north of 4th Street at Santa Anita Avenue The above - described project was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on July 8, 1981 for the division of 33.7 acres into 12 parcels for Industrial Use located north of 4th Street at Santa Anita Avenue. Tentative parcel maps are valid for a maximum of four years, with appropriate extensions. The subject map was initially approved for 24 months and an additional one year extension was granted up to July 8, 1984. The applicant is now requesting another one year extension of time for the recordation of the map. A copy of the approved tentative parcel map and conditions of approval are attached for your review. RECOMMENDATION: It is reccaimiende3 that a 12 -month extension be granted Parcel Map 5697 with the expiration date being July 8, 1985. Respectfully su itted, LBH: : j as Attachments: Map - Tentative & Vicinity Resolution Conditions of Approval C414TWE I June 11, 1984 Community Devel. Dept., Engineering Div. City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga. %;a. 91730 Dear Mr. Rouaeau: .� .l, i <l.i iii l:1 CJ�.Y nil • .. Reference yours of May 21. 1964 re: Time Extension for Parcel Map 5697, we herebv request an extension, and are enclosing our check for $62. The reason for this req,sest is that market conditions relating to sales projections or for obtaining reasonable financing are still not good at this time. Hoping this extension will be approved. I am Very truly yours, WESTMOUNT PROPERTIES 16111 Morrison St., Encino, Ca. 91436 �f t By- �rs� Saul Haimowitz. Pier 7a r J r r.: pro F • Q 'e C- 'I (20A0) o li \ NAP /t8-lS-33 NA ASSESSED ON PL 1> J @J 92 i mac • 1 I 1 ry 90 33 H-c i Isols al } : s •. �.>•J Y p _y I 17 az3's 0.rR:i `28— �va. POE 3 1131 2033'^ 4 Pa" "y +.SAC N �. AO>. Pac! ,r \ 1S is 116 �i �1r Pan 13 l\ r. t�Avi W PT. O Q1; 3 954.:-. 1 ti Aa(6 Lf 43AL. ••L Ac J A Arr. 3 e I �'�P0. 1�2 17 > Q . par. 3, 8 � rE H1L;6 z 4r ac AP�7 (sm Q� w� Ilz 2b n cuaC , r 41-Z 82 OF RANCHO CUCA,% ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP title; PM 5697 PARCM, 567,4UK AN INDUSTPIWA�L vls:orl CITY OF-.ANCIJO CUCAMON 'GA �1 � r.,�E�� x / I3 - .� � � C• I IC I !f. - � a. r2tivf IWIC. f6. t ............ 12 _z cc L wlnvrY It atn imer ac. z iz to 0 -A 9 Z s 11, b. C" m gmss I"'. -,U • .,Lw a ela9 ej T. vacm L64ft tinva 3-30 sacr I-Is MM ..... . .... Ol 250 PC Mr. jry 28+-Gc- t2 55.2% a: .11 CJ N RESOLUTION 7,40. 81 -78 t 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMIDJISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5697 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5597 LOCATED ON SANTA ANNTA AVENUE NORTH OF FOURTH STREET. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 5697, submitted by Westmont Properties and consisting of 12 parcels, located on Santa Anita Avenue north of Fourth Street, being a division of Lot 16 of Parcel Map 4749; and, WHEREAS, on February 19, 1980, a formal application was submitted requesting rev e,,q cf the above- described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOIN, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CO.'-,,MISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the follow`-ig findings have been made: I. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental 'mpacts and Negative Declaration is issued on July 8, 1981. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 5697 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF �t�0 CUCAMONGA Page 2 _ ATTEST: Secretary or ,.he Planning Co:maission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planrt'Ing Commission heid on the 8th day of July, 1981, by the following vote-to- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Dahl, Sceranka, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Tolstoy L l FILED BY: Richard Newton CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0%GA CITY ENGINEERS REPORT i TENTATIVE MAP NO. PM 5697 LOCATION: Santa Anita Avenue - North of Fourth Street DATE FILED: 2/19/80 NUMBER OF LOTS: 12 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 16 of Parcel Map 4749 RECEIPT NUMBER: 06206 FEE: $870.00 ZONE: M-2 TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: J. Richard Newton GROSS ACREAGE: 33.7 ADDRESS:- 624 West "I" Street MINIMUM LOT AREA: Ontario, CA 91762 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: RECORD O'WNER(5) Westmont Properties REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications ADDRESS 16111 Morrison Street Encino, CA 91316 PHONE 213/789 -3904 X i. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on _ Corner P/L radius required on Other — 3.ights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows: 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 i TENTATIVE MAP No. &I7 Page 3 X 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as foilcws: A- Caltrans, for: X B. City: C. County Dust Abatement District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trznches are over n' deep: X E. Cucamonga County Water District: X F. Other: F7nnd rnni -,,i n:_,_. t•1ao Control 22. If oniy a portion o1` this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. _ 23. Th• following lots eppear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected cn t:•e final map: x 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the rignt -of -way line in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. _ 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 25. Tne boundary of the Tentative Clap needs c arification as follows: _ 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existin i•, title explanation required. 9 Per �^eter streets, or Parcel titan 'Waiver 01 _ 28. Information submitted at the time of appiication is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to II Recording for � ❑ Building permit for X 2 °. Proposed subdivision fails within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. Th ?s subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. Zone AO_ X 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wail allong the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. X Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. X 31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across sLT�c+s at fnllotiaing locations: 33. Broad scale hydrolonir studies wi-1 be regutrzu to assess impact o increased runoff. RCE 20 —91 E t TENTATIVE MAP NO. 5697 Page 4 Miscellaneous X 35. Dust abate;nen,_ will be made a condition of issuance o° the grading permit for this project. X 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. 37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and wili require annexation. _ 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: X 39. Proper grading and erosion control, including the preventation of sedimenta -' tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. X 40. A preliminary sails report will not be required for this site for the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. X 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is -received in writing. X 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in acc ,)rdance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the ® property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -tray or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final map unless the City is notified in t:riting of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. X 43. At the time of Final i.ap submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as ref- -ence and/ or showing original lard division_ tie notes and bench mar!cs referer+ ed. 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots _ fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. X 45. Dedication of additional 10' right -of -way on Santa Anita Avenue contiguous to project boundary shall be required. X 46. Contribution to,and participation in, the improvement of Day Creek Channel may be required of each parcel at the time of issuance of building permit. X 47. Drainage of 7th Street shall be redesigned to drain onto Santa Anita Avenue. 48. The width of pavement of 7th Street east of Santa Anita Avenue may be reduced to 44' at the discretion of the City Engineer. The determination shall be made at the time of construe ion permit. X 49. Provide a twporarw street connection between '.he proposed 7th Street and the bridge on Day Creek Channel for fire access. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS ® CITY ENGINEER By RCE 20 '6-10 0 El DATE: TO: FROM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 11, 1984 Chairman and Memners of the Planning Commission Rick Gomez, City Planner BY Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 34 -I8 -- JASKA - The development of two ;2 warehouse buildings totaling 34,475 sq. ft. on 2.34 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 4) and General Industrial /Rail Served District (Subarea 5), located at 9155 Archibald venue - APN 209 - 211 -12. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of a precise site plan and building elevations and issuance of a Neaative Declaration. 3. Purpose: To create two warehouse buildings totaling 34,475 sq. ft. C. Location: South side of 7th Street, east of Archibald. D. Parcel Size: 2.34 acres. E. Existirg Zoning: General Industrial (Subarea 5). F. Exis*_ina Land Use: Vacant parcel. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq: North - Vacant parcel, zoned General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5). South - General Industrial, zoned General Industrial/Rail Served. East - Vacant parcel, zoned General Industrial/Rail Served. West - Vacant parcel, zoned General Industrial. H. General Plan Desi nations: Project 1 e - Genera Industrial/Rail Served (Subarea 5). North - General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5). South - General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5). East - Genera; Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5). West - General Industrial, (Subarea 4). ITEM C PLANNING COKMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84 -18 - Jaska July 11, 1984 rage 2 I. Site Characteristics: The site consists of a vacant zarcel which slopes gently in a north /south direction. Current ",y, the site contains ? variety of indigenous field grasses and native giant materials. No structure3 are located on the site. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is -attached for your review. Staff completed the Environmental Che:kiist and found no significant adverse environmental imp..cts related to the project. B. Impacts: Develoment of the project will increase the amount of water runoff from the property in addition to minimally increasing traffic generation. However, these increases are insignificant since the surrcunding streets and drainage facilities will be provided to handle these increases. III. RECOMMENDATION: eased upon site analysis and the Initial Study, this project will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment. If the Corenission concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration for this project would be in order. 1aS! submitted, r Rick' City RG: FD: ns r :Attachments: Exhibit zA" - Site Plan Exhibit "S" and "C" - Elevations Initial Study, Tart 1 11 I C s i t •YMt `{ M. ZM! R � ��� •]sOI. ^n` (MT.r.i. llw �.". t iMtl 1 _ 1 v �� .✓ IG I 1 �l NT •N'.f. sra nriar[ I _- 1 s i t •YMt `{ M. ZM! R � ��� •]sOI. ^n` (MT.r.i. llw �.". t iMtl 1 _ 1 v �� .✓ ` a ar I 1 �l NT •N'.f. sra nriar[ I _- 1 I u� �w..� —.:fig �t•y:i1.....11 .T. 11....�l.�i, iiTr 'Itnrl .al i. .�,�., �I!i. —�' �I• F t � � —1 : 1 1 1 � t t '. � � .1s•{}ie�yb•�.ea -f �•vs ' _ •�etr�= -911:1 ; j ;,;. "rrr*r,- --.yam, i i�I • tTt�l �, • ] yiijlI_ i�j+ � S .._ � 1 - mF i � !I♦ fM1 iS� ilk! 1 �� `. .��f ! _ __ i i a. • . I a scams OMCR 67RLAL Qasac IFS- =-- i °"� w4gcc CITY a IT -\I-- IZ A\CHLO CUCAN IrJNGAi. Tn -Lr-: P�ati, FL VNTNING DI \gsjo�\T E.\IIY UT= 4l, SC--',LE- C' -3 5� IR:RTH Kt• ,kJj IL r- I r�� X11 A 1 � I CITY O RA INC CLCA N- i i s �T - '-!.fig!::; - _ t G\f num _sZ_ SC:,LE= S a R m m :I Ti'4 \ \ CITY of RANCHO CUCANTONGA TrrLE- oil% ! E m!W: SCk 7 e \ & §� 4� § k� .| §| � C E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT IN:ORMA_•ION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Conuittee through the department where the Project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (i0) days before the pu::lic meeting at which time the Project is to be heard. The Coa-anittee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the aplicant giving further informa- tion concerning the propose-a- project. PROJECT TITLE: Scheu Industrial Park APPLICANT'S NA:'NE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Leland and Allyn Scheu 297 Stowel Street Upland C4 91786 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED C:O2.CERtiING THIS PROJECT: J11;4-n Ral TPC 71 /,N Goc LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 9155 Archiba l d Ai7on „o t? i LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Building Department. Fire Denartment F.nuineerin Dena n I -1 C -& E- -J 11 PRC:iECT DESCRIPTION 'ION 02 PROJECT: Two (2) - ,ui__sngs - Crne-CI7 bui!n, e ana one ki ui ctit.g H c 1) each - concrete o= so.tt. off-ice/ i sq.zt. -Eiare ouse ACREAGE OF PROJECT PIZZA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 17 ac. total project: sxistin 70.560 sort. in five (5) ea. ui!•inQS o ver 5. ac.. 1.079 _ sq.rt., one ui i.ng in process of construction over 1.45 ac. Propose owe sq.tt. ui ing and one 21,067 sq.. *_t. buil over 2.34 ac. (PHASE III) DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFO18IATION ON TOPOGRAPHY; PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EF,IST_ING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Rough grade lot with no significant vegetatior. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a serios of canulative actions, which although individually small, may as a wncle have significant environmental impact? 1-2 ding El WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? _X_ 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? g_ 6. Create the need for use or d. ^posal of potentially hazardos_• mc-cerials such as toiic substances, flazmables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the fora on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required fcr this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further unders - arc that additional info=ation may be required to b submitted before an adequate evaluation can be lade by the De elopment Review Committee. Date Signature L9a� / A Title project Manager -3F f .RESID- ENTIAL CONSTRJCTICN The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability Of the school district to accosa odate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: PEASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHAY,E 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2- N=mber of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to beg, __: construction: Aft 4. Earl:_.st date of occ- " -:acv: Mod— # and = of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Range I -4 CI-4y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART_ II — INITIAL STJDY E- WIRO;MENTAL CHECKLIST DATE• �vi�., �� � %�' APPLICANT: FILING DATE: .NU,,-p. ,Z{ MEJ LOG z .-BER: j PROJECT: C i • ya �Ti+^L� �v c.L %vr ?ROJECT LOCATION: I. EN17IRrj.N • E5TAL I? PACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO I. Soils and Geolocv. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? 7 d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes !n erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, =ud— / slides, ground f--ilure, or similar hazards? L h. —_ An incr —.se in the rate of extraction and /or use of �-.,y mineral resource? 2. Eiydrulosty. Will the proposal have significant / results in: 0–/0 0 -rj. E Page 2 YES_ uaYBE NO a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream j channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pa! terns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of _flood f seaters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? / T g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? i h. The reduction in the amount of water other— / wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Quality. Wil: the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant of periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? / Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality znd /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results ® in: a. Charge in the characteristics of species, including diversity, d'%tribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare ;': or endangered species of plants7y' r // YES KL'YBE SJ c. introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? / b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in P. barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or I wildlife habitat ? / 5. Povulation. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing; housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic ^actors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property valiFs? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e.. buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Lard Use and Planning Cons ;.derations. Will the r proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive ttt recreational opportunities? C1 u J E. B. Transcartation. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on r_xisting streets, or demand for new street construction? c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion, systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water - borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestiians? CO9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontolofical, and /cr historical resources? Page 4 YES :MAYBE NO 10. Health. Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase In existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to pote "ially dangerous noise levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? C -/3 1 s I 1 5 - 1 1 L r 11. Aest_ h_ etics. Will the proposal have significant YES :lAYBE NO results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? ' b. The creation of an aestheLically offensive , site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? ! 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have alterations a significant need for new systems, or to the following: a. Electric power. ! b. Natural or packaged gas? C. Co=unications systems? - 1 d. Water supply? / e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? / g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? -- i. Police protection? j. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ L 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including / roads and flood control facilities? M. Other governmental services? 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources cf energy? d• An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non — renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? a t z 11 Page 5 ;'ES !?GYBE RO e. Substantial depletion of ary norrenL-vable or scarce natural resource? .4/ ` 14. Mandatory Findings of SiZnificarce. a. Does the project have the potential to deErade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, causes = flzh or wildlite population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal comcunity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental gcals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time w'rile long- term impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the rroject have impacts which are irdividuaily :Limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerah�e means that the incremental effectu of an individual project are considerable when viewed in conr_ectior rith the effects of pas-- projects, and probable Future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 11. DISCUSSION OF ZNVI2?O`_4%U V2 1 EVALDATIOV (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of pro; - -)sed mitn_ga: ion measures). J III. DETER3:INATION On the basis of thia imitidl evaluation: �, I find the proposed project COM—D NOT have a significant effect i1 "/ !� on the enviro=ent, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. _ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a sigrifi.cai.t effect !_J i* this case because the mitigztion measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. Date I find the proposed project HSY have a signii =:ant effect on the envir en *_, arR an EENVIRON `'VT MI —FACT 1^-E90DT is requrr =d. /k7 Signature Title Page 7 E 11 Ll- E �J �1 CITY OF RANCHO CUC AlYON'GA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 11, 1964 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY-. Dan Coieman, Associate Planner 1E W; 19ii SUBJECT: ENVIRONNIENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATI'IE TRACT 12597 - LINCOLN - Tne development of 200 conv.=minium units on 11-.I'i rcres of land in the Medium -High R__.dential (14 -24 du/ac)' district located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202 - 102 -•21 and 22. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCR11TION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Development of 200 condominium units (to be oper_led as apartments). C. Location: Northwest corner of 19th Street and Architald Exhibit "A°) D. Parcel Size: 11.11 acres E. Project Density: IS du /ac F. Existing Zoning_ Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) G. Existina Land Use: Single family residence H. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq: (Exhibit °B ") North - Vacant proposed freeway); Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South - Single family residential and _•acant; Low Residential and Office /Professional East - Vacant and Neighborhood Shopping Center; Office /Professional and Neighborhood Commercial 'West - Office, Post Office, Fire Station; Office /Professional and Medium -High Residential ITEM D 0 Z PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORI Tentative Tract 12597 /Lincoln July 11, 1984 Page 2 H. General Plan Desi nations: Project ite - Medium -High Residential (4 -14 du /ac) North - Proposed Foothill Freeway and Low Residential South - Office and Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Office and Neighborhood Commercial West - Office and Civic /Community I. Site Characteristics: The project site contains a single fa,ni y residence and 83 nature trees of different varieties inrluding a Eucalyptus windrow. Thp majority of the site remains undeveloped and slopes to the south at approxirately a 4 % -5A grade. The site 'is bounded on the north by the proposed Foothill Freeway corridor. J. A lica.bie Regulations: The Development Code permits multiple family we Togs in the - -dium -High Resideni.icl District it 18 du /ac under the Basic De..iopment Standards. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed project consists of 200 condominium units. The applicant has indicated their intention, is to initially op, ite the ro'ect as apartments with the passibility )f suture conversion to con ominii-ms. The proposed tract map is for cii0minium purposes, therefore conversion to condominiums worid not require additional City approval. Typically, the anits are stacked in 2 -story building configurations wi h 1- and 2- bedroom floor plans. Recreation facilities will include a pool, spa, tennis court, tot lot and large open lawn areas. Access to the project will be provided from both 19th Street and Archibald Avenue. These access Points will become combined driveways to serve the future office project at tha intersection. B. Issues: The issues associated with this project for the aging Comissiongs consideration are: 1. Does the proposed project mee+. the goals and objei-tives of the Ceneral Plan and the Development Code? 2. What is the appropriate land use (and related housing types) for this N.•operty? ?s the proposed project c^m'atible with the surrounding neighborhood? W El PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12597 /Lincoln July 11, 1984 Page 3 The first issue relates to the intent of the General Plan and Development Code to promote proper transitions of density. The General Plan established six residential density categories "with a range of building intensities (density) that allow flexibility to deal with various site constraints and opportunities ". The General P1 -i designated this site as Medium -High Residential with a density range of 14 -24 dwelling units per acre. The Mediur. -High category is typified by low -rise condomiriums and apartment buildings. The projec-c site was corsi-:erei appropriate for higher building intensity because it is located along the 19th Street transit corridor and adjacent to the future freeway corridor. The size and shape of the project site provides an opportunity to cluster hiaher densities on the north end of the site to provide a proper transition of density. The ultimate density allowable for any given project is to be determined through review of the opportunities and constraints of each site. The proposed project density is 18 du /ac; whereas, the single family tracts to the south and southeast range from 4 to 6.5 du /ac. Therefore, this project represents a significant increase in density as well as the intensity from the surrounding residential area to the south. The proposed project site plan, Exhibit "0 ", indicates two buildings approximately 55 feet from 19th Street. These two buildings are 1 -story on the south sides with a long sloping roof up to tre 2- story on their north sides. Although a 1 -story design, is provided on the south side, the mass or intensity of those buildings is still significantly greater than the 1 -story single family houses on the south side of 19th Street. The second issue regarding land use is the primary issue regarding this project. In addition, the land use designation relates to thr product type associated with the density range. The project site is located within the 19th Street Corridor study area boundary. Recently, the Commission directed staff to in,.istigate a potential land use amendment on this project site. The intent of this study would be to amend the density range to provide a better transition of density and compatibility with the predominantly single family areas south of 19th Street. The Desion Review Committee cautioned the applicant that it may be prenature for the Planning Commission to consider a development proposal on this site because if the pending 19th Street Corridor Study. ,P-3 PLANNING CO VISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12597 /Lincoln July 11, 1984 Page 4 The third issue relates to the impact of this project upon surrounding properties. Neighborhood compatibility is one of the critical concerns for project design identified by the Development Code's Absolute Policies and Design Guidelines. This project conflicts with the following policies and provisions of the Development Code: 1. The project must be compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and neighborhood (Section 17.08.050 B.V. The proposed 2 -story apartment Product was reviewed by the Design Reew Committee and determined to be incompatible with the vi adjacent E -story single family neighbohood in terms cf architectural design - scale, bulk, building height and neighborhood character. 2. The project design must effectively mitigate the aesthetic conflict Letween the proposed development and surrounding land uses (Section 17.08.050 B.2). The project design consists of large, 2 -story apartment buildings that are significantly different from the surrounding neighborhood in terms of architectural design - scale, bulk and building height. The Des -gn Review Committee recommended that the project design does not adequately address this concern and could result in a conflict aesthetically. 3. The project design should preserve mature vegetation as a design element (Section 17.08.090 C.1). The proposed site Plan indicates preserving only 7 of the 21 existing pixie, maple, and elm trees that are most desirable for preservation. 4. Tire mass and scale of the buildings should be proportionate to the surrounding development (Section 17.08.090 0.3). As previously discussed, the proposed large 2 -story buildings are significantly greater in mass and scale than the adjacent single famil,, detached homes. C. Des i n Review Comittee: The Con..J ttee's- consensus was that the pr ^posed -story apartments and project density may not be appropriate in terms of providing proper transition of density and neighborhood compatibility with the existing single family detached homes to the south. Further, the Com*,oittee indicated that they would not recommend approval of the architecture regardless of the project's density. The Committee felt that the proposed architecture did not adequately r,eet the intent of the General Plan and Development Code rbsolute Policies regarding neighborhood compatibilty in terms of scale, bulk and )0.Y El PU,N'IVI7G COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12597 /Lincoln July 11, 1984 Page 5 building height. The ;oranittee recommended that the applicant prepare altcrriative de.,4gn solutions t'at beak up the large building mass by sliding the floor plans to create greater variation on the building face. In addition, the Co.mnittee recommended that the architectural design be redesigned, empt,:_si7ing a single family character in terms of articulating each dwelling unit to provide individual identity per General Plan policy. The roe.` design, should also b3 revised to reduce the large contisious roof mass inconsistent with surrounding single family character. In terms of the site plan, the Carmittee recommended providing single story un -'ts along 19th S',reet, larger open sp ces, combined driveways with the office site, tree preservation, and grading to kEep building pads along 19th Stret as low as possible. The applicant has revised the site and grading plans, as shown in the attached exhibits, to reflect these concerns. The applicant is willing to transplant existing trees worthy of preservation. The Committee recommended approval of the site plan subject to providing 1 -story buildings along 19th Street. In response to these recc mendations, the applicant p-ovided an offsec in the building face by sliding the floor plan in the center. The roof design was adjusted accordingly wherever the floor plan was altered or the foundation was stepped. As previously described, the two buildings closest to 19th Street were redesigned with 1 -story apartments on the South side to reduce the bjiiding mass. However, this resulted in a large expanse of the roof mass as shown in Exhibit "G -3 ". These revisions were reviewed by the Committee and considered to inadequately address their concerns. Further, the Committee indicated that the architectural design of all buildings, not just the 19th Street stro_etscape, was a concern. The Committee recommended that, at a minimum, all buildings /units along 19th Street ne single story. D. Development Review Committee: The Committee was concerned with minimizing traffic conflicts, par`- ilarly left -turn movements, on 19th and Archibald. Therefore, the Committee recc�cnended that the access points be relocat,Td and used as combined driveways with tha future office project on the corner, as shown in Exhibit "U ". ,0 -S PLANNING COMMISSIO'i S7.7F REPORT Tentative Tract 12597 /Lincoln July 11, 1984 Page 5 E. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee was concerned with minimiz :.,g the grade differertial along 19th Street and recommended that the pad elevations not exceed 5 feet above curb grade. The Committee approved the revised concept.al grading plan, Exhibit "F", subject to the conditions listed in the attached Resolution of Approval. The revised building pad elevations are generally 2 -5 feet higher than the curb elevation. F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applican" and is attached for your review. Staff completed the Environmental Checklist, visited the site, and reviewed the traffic study. Based upon this review, staff has determined that the project could have the following Significant adverse environmental impacts: Impact: This project will result in the removal of 14 of the spine, maple, and elm trees considered worthy of preservati-in. Mitia__ ate_ The applicant proposes to transplant, wherever possible, the remaining 14 pine, maple and elm trees. is addition, the majority of the exisi.ing Eucalyptus windrows will be retained. The project will be required to plant new trees at a rate of 5fl trees per gross acre. act: The proposed project density of 18 du /ac is a substantial increase in density for the immediate neighborhood. In addition, th! project design does not provide proper transition of density and neighborhood compatibility as required by the General Plan and Development Code. Mitigation: One possible mitigation is to provide only single story units along 19th Street and redesign architecture to be compatible with the adjacent single family character and transition the density to the rear (north) of the subje -t site. Impact: The proposed project consists of large, 2-story apartment buildings that are significaintly di`ferent i architectural design, scale, bulk and building hei,,ht with the surrounding neighborhood. Therefore, this project would be aesthetically incompatible with and insensitive to the immediate environment. Miti ation: See Design Review Cornitt.ae recommendation previous'—discussed. y Q - lC r. L. X -1 -1 El PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12597 /Lincoln July 11, 1984 Page 7 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In censidering a r-,sidential development project, the Planning Commissi0a must make the findings listed in the attached Resolution. However, it is the recommendation of the Design Review Committee and staff that the proposed project does not meet these findings. Therefore, the findings listed in the attached Resolution of Denial were supported by the following facts: 1. The proposed building design and site plan are inconsistent with the provisions, intent, and purpose of the Development Code, particularly with regard to neighborhOLJ compatibility. 2. The proposed building design and site plan are inconsistent with the policies and intent of the General Plan, particularly with regard to proper transition of density. 3. The construction of this project will have a signficant impact in changing the number of existing trees by removing 14 cut of the 21 trees worthy of preservation, IV. OPTIONS: The followin3 options may be considered by the Planning Cornni ss i on : 1. Conditionally approve the project with modifications to address the concerns for proper transition of density anc: architectura' compatibility. A Resolution of Approval, with appropriate conditions, is attached for your review and consideration. 2. Deny the project due to inconsistencies related to the int,.It and provisions of the General Plan and Development Code. A Resolution of Dertial is attached for your review and consideration. 3. Continue this project pending further action regarding a land use amendment on this site as a result of the 19th Street Corridor StLdy. This would require the consent of the applicant_ and authorization to extend the processing time lints established by State law. V. CORRESPONDENCE: Th :s item has been in Tne Dai-iy Report newspaper, the were sent to property owners within To date, no cc:rrespondence has been this project. 0-7f advertised as a public hearing property posted, and notices 300 feet of the project site. received either for or against PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 125 7/Lincoln July 11, 1984 Page 8 Vi. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review a— Cider all material and input on :,his project. If the Comm-lssiol� can support the facts for findings, then adoption of the attached Pesolution of Approval with conditions would be appropriate. If the Commission, cannot support the facts for finding, then adcation of the attached Resolution of Denial or continuance by winute action would be appropriate. Resp ctfuiiy submitted, i ck/ `Qqo aez ity Planner RG:DC:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit IV - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - SL'-divisicn Map Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Elevations Exhibit "H" - Existing Tree Locations Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval Resolution of Genial 40-1? EA 11 �J i t , a za o< , 2 .3 Z�. I - I 7" 2-- Ssr I 1 + I =r AIA r . = 6 S1 !9 +^ •46 i �) 5� 5F :4C - - HIGHLAND all 4 35 AC \ �.9 T AC u/` G'���♦ � ` �� URcstN i • . o• 17 ! =--------- - - - - -- - % t`(( PAI ♦ 1 2 76 AC -F6p •' IFE z 7. Aft /47 5r -till e _ . Vk clot N'T _ (sue F ?I 1= n t [ 17 y . _ e43 F- s Par. , 9.44 AC la /t 62) 87 CITY Or RAINCHO CUCA 1I0,'G,.k PLANTINI \G DIVIS (),\ ii INUXfH iTENJ. "irtZ�3� T nu: l�l2.�Tiol� EXHIBIT. _ V-_ SCALE- IG - td EI 0 r-I L i e4 J II I - ?L\i 7-f / I 1 IY _z Y ;� /I-1 -vii \�• �� /� � ���� �. I iT�C[T j rE�NTAMVM TRPGT NO.-M597 V V NORTH CI-IY OF n,,,,.— lr dz" i RANCHO CUCATTVIONGA mu: ° %U*MjVi Almon PLANNING DIVtSIia\T E\Htarr:--Ca— scALE: ..CCNY "Coat I vacm( 1 7�F II11 F.A :.r I A • y r • 1 —? :' LJ. T ;� _ /' 90a •M.le• 1, . ��1 •a ere••ep \ OCOM i - r Ell } - C� L o0•. 1`7 r I II �I m c•n f OC 1 rlelal v.L/ iI -scam I t•c•M I� SCALE: 1�40' 1 THE CRESTUNE iI a La COLK •aOIEKT\• COIRAN� MY OF RANCHO CuCAN1'GA PLANNING DIE'LSION rI'E:! I- MV54 `7 TITLE- -fit" 5 F'L� EXHIBIT - _�_ SCALE. /0 -/a 1 V INOM i u rr�m .•n un i nrofaSeI� Yersc-7Wi"T`T cegzrpera b.n C" mo ei.f Ifni STREET �Y•ial ! .fc•., ! .ae•nt I .gMfa�' 1 •���� °n� 1 CITY OF rr .%I: `T EZ "? R-A:NCHO CUCAMONGA -;lTu: - LAWDSCA PLAINNING DIVISION EXHIBIT- F, SCAI.E- _ -i3 n x 0 m 1 - - - -- ------------- - ei.f Ifni STREET �Y•ial ! .fc•., ! .ae•nt I .gMfa�' 1 •���� °n� 1 CITY OF rr .%I: `T EZ "? R-A:NCHO CUCAMONGA -;lTu: - LAWDSCA PLAINNING DIVISION EXHIBIT- F, SCAI.E- _ -i3 n x 0 m Q � L s MTM rcr� arrai 1 ED �i � � a'1�j y , .fit CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN,IO\GA PLuvTNTiiNTc DIVOON . r-1 -, r.._.. mw.owo TENTATIVE TRACT Np_ 12397 i Ear: M 121"7 EYHar: _ SCALE, O- ly NORTH E S Y a ILI, m a � y �' I` I 0 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION RIGHT IDDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION rnVn� 4C�.�IR'A C V NORTH CITY OF ITEM- /2s'Q 7 RANCrD CUCAMONGA Tom- _ J7701-F &-0 VW77A PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT - SCAT -£- a- t.= 6 ^/r E m sL L (J� VACANT i VACANT VACANT C) 2.03 AC •. \`( \ \� \ WELL S:TE \I\ \ \� '+C OP 1.1 Ac �Ut FlRE Sf4T70N PAR. 2 \ �� \ ST OFFICE \\3dfi y CCMMERCIAL \� \`•� \• ' ` OFFICES r 11 ,n y 4,35 Ac Z L Ij L VACANT �Q V4CAn 1� III \N" \ 1yy1 f` .\ x\ N\ \ \YACANNr I PL PAR. 7 2 ��= I� 700MMERCIAL /5� i 111 -t•. —►� iv i •o• iGb; \ •\ PAR. 2 \\A OD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAZXIONGA PLANNING DIVL --10� e I lSTH � STRE='T r tir �i N; / .G• 77 C7 1 > !-� __. 1 FORTH TITLE - r=154rfd& 7Zi ff 7OJS EXHIBIT. �_ SCALE- r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO*NGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMIATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: x67.00 For all projects requirinq environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Conrnittee through the department ::here the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of thr--a determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: The Crestline Tract 12597 APPLICANT'S NAIME, ADDRESS, TELEP130NE: Lincoln aC, Inc., 16152 Beach Blvd., Ste. 160 East, uni�gto NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Kenneth Moulder, SW G`_.*)uD, 11601 Olv�oic Blvd., Los AngeL�, CA 90064, : M1 477-1':i 1 LOCATIO:Z OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR ?ARC---L NO.) 11.7 acres, Nv1 corner Archibald and 19t-h. -02- 101 -21 *and 202- 101 -22 mac! aces .3. acres zonea _. ,an.cn is nor- arc ucee .^ i_�. c wee -,erual atzaG :X.^- .. n LIST OTHER PEMMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUINvG SUCH PEMITS: Tentative :an. Final sam atzee} I -1 /0-;?O • C, PROJECT DESCRIPTION PTION OF PROJECT: The applicant plans a 232 unit condomi-nium 1"Ient. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND.SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 11- 7acres. Existina SF residence Pcti ated to be 3500+ sq. ft. Proposed develornent I 04,uVu + sQ. ft. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONYIENTAL SETTIYr -. JF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGF:APHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HIS'-ORICAi. OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF— C T^ uN13Ih'C•i+$OPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY •!.4XISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Subject property is generally level. There are no known cultural or Gne .... res;.cL- Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cu.^iulativ_ actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? Prnje:.t is planned as two phase project. Phase one will cc--sist of 158 units (80 MR, 80 2BR) with 320 parking spaces including 42 west spaces, and all recreational facilities, Phase tdo will consist of 64 units (32 1BR, 32 23R) with 122 parking spaces, including 16 guest spaces. I -2 r i e t I J, 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PTION OF PROJECT: The applicant plans a 232 unit condomi-nium 1"Ient. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND.SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 11- 7acres. Existina SF residence Pcti ated to be 3500+ sq. ft. Proposed develornent I 04,uVu + sQ. ft. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONYIENTAL SETTIYr -. JF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGF:APHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HIS'-ORICAi. OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF— C T^ uN13Ih'C•i+$OPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY •!.4XISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Subject property is generally level. There are no known cultural or Gne .... res;.cL- Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cu.^iulativ_ actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? Prnje:.t is planned as two phase project. Phase one will cc--sist of 158 units (80 MR, 80 2BR) with 320 parking spaces including 42 west spaces, and all recreational facilities, Phase tdo will consist of 64 units (32 1BR, 32 23R) with 122 parking spaces, including 16 guest spaces. I -2 r i e t I FL e -)ENTIAL CCNSTRUCTION :rte following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division, in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district_ to acco ^. -odate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Lincoln Pronerti C I-c ry : Specific Location of Project: _XII Corner of Archibald and 19th, Rencho cuca.mnaa I PHASE Z PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of ;ingle fa:.ily units: None None 2. Nur %ber of multiple family units: X68 64 3. Date Proposed to Slrnmer begin construction: 1984 1985 Est. 4. Earliest date of occupancy: 1985 1985 'st Model and 9 of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Rance 112 1 Br _dot Set 80 32 120 2 Br Not Set 88 32 I-4 i 60 11 Exhibit .A i =-' 3 FC-:- V11TDER P A-RZ� TT 52597 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF 3.67+ ACRE PARCEL DESIGNATED OP LOCATED AT NW COINER OF ARCHIBALD BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 1805, BOOK 16, PAGE 19, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. The easterly 457 feet of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 1805, in the City of Rancho Cucamorce, County of San Bernardino,, State of California, as shown on map filed in Book 16 Page 19 of Parcel Maps in the office of the Recorder of said County. Except the northerly 276 feet of the easterly 173 feet. Except the northerly 313 feet of the westerly 284 feet of the easterly 457 feet. -E E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 'OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA, CALIFORNIA, COND'_T :,.... "'.Y APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12597 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12597, ""ereinafter "Map " submitted by Lincoln Property Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision for condominium purposes on 111.11 acres located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue into 3 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on July 11, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12597 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Cede, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.. D- PS� E E Ll C E, 11 Resolution No. Page 2 (9) That this project will the environment and issued. not create adverse impacts on a Negative Declaration is SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12597, a copy of which is attached kereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. At least two, but no more than three, exterior stucco colors are to be provided throughout the project. 2. That all buildings shall be redesigned to provide an architectural design compatible with the adjacent single family neighborhood. This shall include, at a minimum, greater variation on the building face to minimize the appearance of the building mass and articulation of individual units '.o create individual identity. Said revisions shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee. 3. Provide only single story buildings along 19th Street. 4. Building pad elevations along 19th Street shall not- exceed five (5) feet above curb grade. 5. The westernmost north /south street shall be provided with a tilt section to cause the drainage tr be directed east on the east /west street. 6. Provide secondary surface overflow protection between Buildings 1 and 2 in the southwest corner of the site. 7. Preserve existing mature pine, maple, and elm trees to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 8. Details of the carports shall be included in the final construction plans to the satisfaction of the City Planner. ENGINEERING DIVISION: 1. A portion of the property along the north boundary as shown on the map shall be reserved for future freeway right -of -way. Q -a6 Resolution No. Page 3 2. A parcel map shall be recorded to separate the vacant lots at the southeast corner of the property and the freeway right -of -way from the condominium project site prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the tract map. 3. The requirement of median island on Archibald Avenue will be waived after adoption of the Resolution by the City Council to eliminate the median. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11th DAY OF JULY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ;,Zrnis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of t3,e City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: O -av 11 L-1. N V9gD ciPOy •✓ Y�V` ^VC V✓ u _ d 0� L Ll V D �\ c Ns a «GOC. $`E °a f 2 •n q - o= J Fc_M e ` _ a\✓o- n a Yom- n .°.0 ✓qt npN .e p D \r„c T. - V ^� a r CPC S a C^ L C t« «t q �• b-^J r _ t� AW s G Q F~ �- �j Oiu� _.ne d� �I � ��`^ -•C upC✓C�a F O�O� COn �6L �Qn P �N�y O- .TgLVU �C� >S�9 CNr `N 20�� �i 7V T✓ �C'G OV ^ m u ��9 OC` 0 OgONt 7.Ce Vc�� E L� a LNG =�r9 O O.✓V V N iNt q Uri Lam= C h_C YY ^. O O 9��r� ` q •q'. O «C q r •'•+� °, C C O= ✓ J d^ n L 6 E ^.. T T T Ld. 2 -J C N •� =6=�� y'�C dI V= J-Jd d 6 �V� >L Q C'J d � y^ = r e N •� q C a N � J t t p� a nQ a L C •H a c C 9�VN C« .L_ OV _C 2 C r, a9 C. u G - V t C L ✓ E N _ C✓ C T q a y� qq€ '-Y r.+ n � c rJE Lt✓ L �>. ^ -i^ c C C^ G J r T� G G N C O q 4 � O i �✓« O � u q V _r L= _T M ' dC� d _ _ t q a SgQ6� n g C O C Cq LOdC LqT L° '_N ti O^ N u'J V i o n ry O S u 'y ✓ ^C GV r? - �qO L�V�� u c d w rra sY, y• '° NcGC« n wO1 ° ✓ YN ° Nao yT N O_ M_ i.°c T�q M °✓ -_° .°r_ E c✓ ° c L�LG -, ✓r P• OO • Lgq iC rp OGr. L Cc M N d �p rCV N ^ • aO u_ n ✓ O UC ✓ N O 9 J= (O d C J a G t O C A L ap VL �✓ r dn N • r G ¢ 2 c^ 9 _✓ O C� a V VF' >✓ �' N r q_ d� N d d p uJ W i n w n _N qa _ _ U N ^ L 0 = •�.� _ y Y ! V ^ U _ Y V V q n d 10 q n^ C C sc l T �/ O W� �= C V • C t M �_ � L y 04q Vlr CC Vnq ✓L GD�V �9 a�T000 aD C NC 6NVC �y ^O r q a P� N •ei fv T V r T C C O v d L L v j L t O 11 C q d G y Pp -� O 0 7 6 6 ✓... 2-.5 pLo ✓Li V n_ tU. J � g E n P O^ d G E r ^ __ J p .9• ¢ M V d- ✓� i N M V) S M d V V: O C y= 6 \Or w J « 4✓ � 6 r O 6 q= � OJ 2 C Q J 6U V Ci a q CQ ->.964 L Luc ^::- � � q- n... ✓� o��_ .. r r= V _p .c�a`c > o� 2 0✓ q� � v✓ G N Yi C, y Nr tC .;✓c Gi � nn >i ErD xa =y Ca tip ✓r �_�� E✓rL v T✓ Ler ✓_ «Cup •"« Lno n.r c a €Vtui'^S cc✓SD 6u�z4 rVy�O r✓ Gq ii l E y F� =V n L£✓ q� ✓ � O T = N O• •J C _ _o _N � 9 D V d q L' q� � C c O o C✓ t •_.,. u r� A= `^ C< c N c q �' � _� q ^ Y .e O •.' a d V C _ C J N V? v q� G N .p L V C= N L L C O O i L .• O °^ r v O �c °v per q r ^ro Nav rn �uo.ey ✓cc q c° .\.✓a �oN U q _ J O O ^ L t✓= Y q u N y G C g C N q L i L N C C n F 7 G G •w y^ a 4 O C V y O `' C VV r.^d C V C"= c. Sot_ qc .L..ncv =s is '° coq oe� 2:5 v`'•' Lta> ?cV�f «np eoo'. cor Lx`uc L¢ n smc -° L =0 uaa rNtOjV Q` 9 nu L> E -.. 'O ? VN� -o vrcC =r G OJ uL= Cx y C: L`�r0 Cr N _ _SQy « =Na C-j L� ^pG «E. lJ C:.. ^x � ^ -• c TVOrnL >L � 9E�OCU qoo 00 -• �j. L p T 6 O > u 0 uJ V C V n L q 4 O L G r 4 O L q q r G gD N q TOO L 09 u ��'rV ^__ •�E �C« cCgq V2� Or Y.O nC O. rCj t4r_`V✓ \Cl L� C ��f qNW L` ci Er °^ «Sr aV �•t"CCUr qa u.n « Nc ��.L. -T «o« C n 2 D C C C V y> - •On � C c O �= = �'` U a C g n C Q L M 7 d ® O O 4 a ✓vu L L d e e C a� C -cv V u✓ j l T. O O T L C= a - q � ^� sE�« PQOC o L c.- \IMC >o a Y r J- �- �r__ru vai =�nc •� o. n v��_ r aMJ �• ONC J.-rL e.^u �C �rE` v\n4 6u Ud 'LJa�t i...i \Ji�4« Cq r. -gQgn _ QFi60 � \� AO N `rl%- v N 01 v cu •O L Cl. c q c � C O o = C •C V off? v = o L v C C q a• y ° � u C � O 6 u V G V 7 � r q O 0 r ^_r y C ^ q �• q V M V F V •La � ° = C V O d • V •J•, G_Cu d Ci N� _ qn U r • E a1P c nN JLV da d C � L _ L q < L J L � L �C Ct• V q G C qU6 n c r m —c= q � 7 Vim^ i JLEO � C O N V r 9 q p L J n ➢IrN d _ 6 N N os cF G s �i O E q v O G 2 L L s ° o q c O L C � r L •n G V J E L G q Y O J T G9 2 7 V 4 = := v ru ors c _ r v C t O O d O •n pa - < `r ::o < G u Y 6 d P O U 10 ONr < 06 y,�L u q PGV L < >•Or _ <LO cv u� uEx d _ 6 N N os cF �i 2 L J N O T G9 uqn d a y L 6 d P O U i d ^a u q P _- N =��r� u L C 3` q I ° V •- C E M 4`J 7 T 9� N r L L»62 6w r � •� c ccr- i V O. N � c =s V O � d = =�q M�q L. f-• V 'iV ✓ t V P A.9 T a Cr _a` p C a L 1 r e � w 2 O y T� G L L V O V e _C n• r i L O N - � 'c c� o < V °v• ^ 7 ^ S M n. i. e V V n� q ^. i G 6 sq = a quc 4 r C � O < � 6 V n.< b C G G > C �? ° c S a C O V C - V Ce O C O V S c u z " t z <C> G 6 z•'d T L ra- L C V V U O� -O u V n n O < 'Oc s c �• < 1r ao c IL a i5 1I T N 1 d 1 u d `V I>• O E Imo' O i L •.T L O O L q a uu ow+o N V• I s D-31 r J O O S °LL J G 4°i L ^ _ y u S r J V 2 9 r t l�a • C y. G C � C� G r 3 q < E Lr��n � s a upr Vao -cc cc = O ,Wr L _ 6• _O a q l •^ L r L- CL �cic= N p 2 y � C N U L i_T _ vu L 9 t q � L r rr O C L F _Gr O O V C G r o e C L <�w q l w = 6 u O i yq_ r E O Gca •a > v 01 11 C I i` L U U i d C 11 •F No� d V - � c �Kj I - _ Y r/ N � C L C N 3 G L tl u 6 iJO � b z M n -L •. L C > d u• � 'C U Y v jq0 N��jVnOy N d jY O `C• r� nu G .e COO •• � V9 I YY.� UN r `= `� 9 7 �U � g V P N j C �� 6• V. ` �� V � P E C O G G N G q < ✓ a f ... q V V L P OuC PqL n •J t C d C N V— N N« �3 .+ d C L4} p2] 4 LLQ O� an Ca y V T YL >0•... G P \ui 1 F ' Ta N_`V Ow �� d rJ�� •+ cr Vet t a _ c ` N c I c o _ Y� c cv `d n� •• °• A °c o =.. v` «� of a � M LLI O .� N r•f T a P c c N � ; r3 V O E P — 0 c rr V� c E v to � c �Kj I - _ Y r/ N � C L C N 3 G L tl u 6 iJO � b z M n -L - _ Y r/ n -L v c2 Z .e G G N G q < ✓ a f ... q V V L P p E n •J t C d C N V— N N« O �• c C —_ C � a _ V T G P \ui 1 ' = ` D - 33 RESOLUTION NO. i A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA:�lOha;. PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING TENTATIVE TRACT 12597 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE IN THE MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 6th day of April, 1984, a complete aF. - Ition was filed by Lincoln Property Company for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of July, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project, follow,: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolves as SECTION 1: That the Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract 12557: 1. The proposed project is in conflict with the intent and purpose of the General Plan regarding the Medium -High Residential district in terms of providing a proper transition of density. 2. the proposed project is inconsistent with ,;he Absolute Policies of the Development Code regarding neighborhood compatibility, 3. That the project design is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood in terns of architectural design, scale, bulk, building height and neighborhood character. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract 12597 is hereby denied based on inconsistency wit the provisions, intent and purpose of the Development Code, which was adopted to implement to goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11th DAY OF JULY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary D -3s• 0 E u CITE" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 11, 1984 19" TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12721 - PSOMAS. HARRISON & ASSOCIATES ROBERTSON HOMES NORTHERN - A tota eve opment and subdivision of 19.4 acres into four lots to allow the development of 270 units in the "M" (Medium Residential) District, generally located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue, north of Arrow Highway - APN 208- 021 -14. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of a precise site plan and unit design. B. Purpose: To create a 270 unit apartment complex. C. Location: East side of Vineyard Avenue, north of Arrow Highway. D. Parcel Size: 19.4 acres E. Existinq Zoning: "M" (Medium Density Residential) F. Existing Land Use: Vacant parcel G. Project Density: 13.92 Du /Ac H. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning: North - Apartment complex, zoned Medium High Residential South - Vacant parcel, school, zoned Medium Residential East - Single faaily residential, zoned Low Residential West - Vacant parcel, zoned Medium Residential I. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Density Residential (8 -14 du /ac) North - Medium High Residential (14-24 du /ac) South - Med um Residential (8 -14 du /ac) East - Loy Residential (2 -4 du /ac) ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12721 /Psomas, Harrison & Associates July 11, 1984 Page 2 J. Site Characteristics: The site slopes gently from the northwest to the southeast at approximately a 2% slope. In general, the site is covered by indigenous plant materials, including several stands of mature Eucalyptus windrows. The most prominant Eucalyptus windrow traverses the site in a north /south fashion. No structures are located on the parcel and no street improvements exist along Vineyard Avenue. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed development will consist of 270 units contained in 27 unit clusters. As illustrated on the site plan (Exhibit "A "), the complex is composed of two driveway /circulation loops which encircle various dwelling units. Adjacent to the loop driveway system are various carports desigred to accommodate resident parking. Two hundred and seventy covered parking spaces will be provided in addition to 248 un-overed stalls. As illustrated on the site plan (Exhibit "A "), the applicant has oriented the proposed dwelling units away from the existing single family structures located to the south. In addition, no circulation connection will be made to the easterly single family subdivision, providing a greater buffer between existing and proposed land uses. Lastly, the grade differences between the proposed development and the existing single family neighborhood to the east appear minimal. The proposed development wild mail the existing grade along the easterly property line. Lastly, a 5- to 6-foot grade differential will occur contiguous to a portion of the northerly property line, adjacent to Tract 12490. The applicant intends to contour grade at this location with 2:1 to 3:1 slopes. B. Design Review Committee: 'he Design Review Committee was primarily concerned with the architecture of the project and recommended that the block -like appearance of the building footprints be redesigned to provide more variation by staggering reoflines and building footprints. In addition, the Committee recommended adding trellis and garden wall elements designed to achieve a more townhome appearing unit. The DRC also recommended that the recreation building, which is the main focal point to the development, should be redesigned in order to project a more dramatic clubhouse /recreation image and that the building should not appear as an apartment unit. C 11 U PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12721 /Psomas, Harrison & Associates July 11, 1984 ® Page 3 E C. Develooment Review Committee: The Development Review Committee was primarily concerned with drainage and recommended that half of the site drain towards Vineyard Avenue. In addition, the Committee recommended that a vehicular access easement to the southerly parcel be provided. Lastly, the Development Review Committee recommended that a pedestrian access point be provided to the elementary school to the south. D. Gradinq Committee: The Grading Committee approved the conceptual grading plan subject to the conditions of approval provided on the attached Reso;L;tion. It should also be noted that elevation differences between existing elevations at the south property line and proposed ,•oject elevation will differ by 5 to 6 feet (the proposed elevations being higher than the existing ground). However, the applicant has provided a gentle 3:1 slope along the property line designed to mitigate this situation. The Grading Committee felt that the height of the slope was necessary to prevent depressions in the center of the project which might cause ponding of water. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist :lid found no sl3nificant adverse environmental impacts related to the project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on the attached Resolution are supported by the following facts: o The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the development and the proposed residential uses are in accordance with the objectives of the General Plan and 'Zoning Ordinance. o The proposed site plan, in conjunction with the Conditions of Approval, is consistent with the current development standards of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12721 /Psomas, Harrison & Associates July 11, 1984 Page 4 V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a pub is hearing and receive all public input on this matter. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for findings and conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Beclaration is recommended. 0 FD:jr submitted, Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial Resolut "A" — Site Plan "B" — Grading Plan "C" — Elevations "D" — Floor Plans Study, Part I ion of Approval with Conditions ,Z-9 E 11 r� } wn ' 't. • � � .. � , � .Ii it � \, ��Y��� J— I' ( ! L. -�'•- -yI C�'. fD kk Y o •\ 1 Air. �� was QOOf�4T9.7K Y6�LS wtCQ>•1�<�`wl. ^ <+w +O�o2s2� sam erowaw oe. ie.. .as •-w�� ..m �Qacr ..a Or�•�..1 _ _ _ _ _ ! � G� O.� O�.w(y0 Cu /.�upwpv ® CITY OF RAi "AG CUC.j-\,,N,IO\G PLkN ING DRISON ITEM: TITLE:: ly rn E \Ii:i31T: �. SG1L: Z- S C V NORTH . I — '_ .. Z.4 30 I—..I .. p _! �1.s ow..•. Tyy����V" RA4lOCiQQ r.�s .�...•.� S i'D IVOGTIiEQad CITY Off' RAINCI -10 CL:CA -IO \'CA PLiLNNI \'G DIVLN i 1%, .ia vs 11. I . I — '_ .. Z.4 30 I—..I .. p _! �1.s ow..•. Tyy����V" RA4lOCiQQ r.�s .�...•.� S i'D IVOGTIiEQad CITY Off' RAINCI -10 CL:CA -IO \'CA PLiLNNI \'G DIVLN i 1%, ITE.N I: Tom° E.'`I iiBrr: . 1=;?- SG1LE- ojelf-G V NORTH 0 IWO0000N6 ✓ LLpAL ..r�ryO..e..•MQ: 0% ITE.N I: Tom° E.'`I iiBrr: . 1=;?- SG1LE- ojelf-G V NORTH 0 IWO0000N6 ✓ LLpAL ..r�ryO..e..•MQ: ITE.N I: Tom° E.'`I iiBrr: . 1=;?- SG1LE- ojelf-G V NORTH 0 F l i# 2 O. t W J W t Y 6 1 a 8y s iy m a` W l 2 O F W J Y: n�2 A--�3 LE cQ w q EP TI Lqll o Lim �t n CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCA',L%"IOXGA TITLE: s Y s PL-c NNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: G SCALE: �7 r a 1 1 P 1 e „ i 1 w CTS oCl 'o) � ' 1 n a a r � -_' = 1 - .. � ••� J-• © /fir ���� // � 6 � O e L2 jig T L 0 fq fn 0U ' 111 p Z'H CITY OF ITCH: -.* RAi\-CHO C.CANIO NGA TITLE: PI � s PLANNING DIVLIQN E- mimiT -_ gCALr, 0. E Ell CITY OF R;NCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT ?NFORMILTION SHEET - To be completed by applicant EnvironmE_atal Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Ar_alysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) lae project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: .tioodsonQ Uilil "e APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 3400 Bradshaw Road. Suite A -S_ Sacrmrucnrn_ r, -0637 NAM.B, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Chuck Geiger, 3901 Lune Street, Riverside, CA 92501, (714) 787 -8421 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) `linevard Avenue. A.P. No. 208- 241 -002_ -&� LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 r 3 C .® PROJECT DESCRIPTI1- . Ceneral Legal: A portion of Lot 10, Cucamonga Vineyard Tract U.B. 30/44 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING ;O :D PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Approximate acreaW of the nroiect is 19.4 acres. There are no existine stnic`ures onsite The nronosed cimu )ative Sauare fnntnae nF rho __ ,�, �,.,. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORi1ATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTIGN OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Y. l9flG4ltafllai3HS�CF)� i '=us treec are planted, . ran_ Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, whicr. although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No I-: FROM 11 1 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO Y 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial chanae in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Crate changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 15t _ X o". Create the need for use or disuosal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: In the rear portion of the IMPORTANT: If the project invcives th e .onstruction of j residential units, complete the form on next page. j i CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the at--ached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Develcpment Review Co=mittee. Date ?Dril 25. 1984 Signature vuTX /f Title Proiect Planner -- 3 Z // ' i RESIDENT!: -A CONSTRUCTION The following infor:natio' should d be provided to she City of Rancho Cucamorca g Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of th district to accormodate the proposed residential develop -m;nt. e school Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: !�obertsorn Hones Northern Specific Location of Project: Vinevard avenue PH.�SE I PciySE 2 P?�ASE 1_ Number of single 3 P?—as' 4 TOTAL family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 70 72 74 J4 270 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 9/84 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model# and n of Tentative Number of 5. Bed_ rooir-S Price Range btodels $70 goo 120 — — tto 40 li0 I -4 �%Z C 0 �J RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAN ?SING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCPd %10�.G;., CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12721 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No, 12721, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Psomas, Harrison and Associates (Robertson Homes Northern) applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a total development and subdivisior, of 19.4 acres into 4 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on July 11, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recorRnended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12721 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvemsots of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the t —ne of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; �f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. ,Z-/3 Resolution No. Page 2 (9) That this project will the environment and issued. not create adverse impacts on a Negative Declaration is SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12721, a copy of which is attached Hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. A six (5) foot high concrete block wall shall be provided contiguous to the north, east, and south property lines. 2. Extensive landscaping shall be provided adjacent to existing single family dweilings located to the east. 3. All garden wallipatio fencing shall be staggered ±5 feet in relation to neighboring dwellings. 4. Recreation, building rooflines shall be broken and staggered in order to project a clubhouse /recreation image. The final design -hail be approved by the %ity Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 5. A trellis work entrance feature shall be provided at the entrance to the recreation building. The final design shall be approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 5. A materials sample board shall be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. ENGINEERING DIVISION: 1. The applicant shall be required to widen the west side of Vineyard Avenue in order to provide a dual left -turn pocket on the street. 2. A pedestrian access to the school property to the south shall be provided. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11th DAY OF JULY, 1984. PLANNING COh1MISSION OF THE CITY 0: RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. _tout, Chairman z 11 E 11 Resolution No. Page 3 El ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly ar6 regularly introduced, passed, adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a ragular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of auly, 1934, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIUNERS: N01 S: COt4MISSIOPlERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E L� .cols' >•=�� V O V d T a ^ B O A _ L Y O u.6�r •.r N J PGG i'N_1.J G•E �LO Mnu O�Q JA oQ Ay u- J�_T.r dQno.` V V C i SOr V �E C. AN Ow Z. Y �J�C+ °CrQ V r vN� -� °d�dA mei ��. - _ QP� >q O �P4 Pr ..Q p�Lf _N yN L 9CPdr pL.r � �.�L C6_dr✓ A O C GO L V G N r c V r C ? V V C G •°idV� �c CHr y FN .yco= v o cae 4me vI 2rnNa n ^VA67 EnL AE O' r00(]r u� � xl 0 H_ S y O `o 4 O L.1 u ° c N V = � '7 J •[ G 6 J ^ L " A u G ov �' O c � C Y 4 e P N V y L r Q � V y O Y P E q C M N 0 L j « L 4=� - n ° c Qo° G n e _> i ` O - o c N C G o e Qa '. 6 - v > c+ N d T EY 6 O c ` ter•+ -Gt P •N �• T J � Gp0 9 v C L G q C L V. PGO 9 y A V 0 -4 a_ v. 9? C1 P N E G O V G Y O c V _ p- 6.ri��4�L s NQ�r dP •SS C C O O A g N y r r d r •E � y�T ^ q d v d C Q _ L ACOY�i r 0 r r y e 2 r y A G N yVy O c d d C u V nqC I_COL@ C N IIL- N V j P d q n k L d N d E EQ 'uG c c 4 d A G con cc��° - Eor Ao A N -p�- N 4c e A 4 n c m A r o i G L G C >J CQ d o LV r O L C� r - N T ^ L r n f q q 0 q ^ Q N P° O•QQ J -c 06 dG Gr- ° Vf a v e« cm r 0 ^ L d V P n Q q nc V d V \GVI n 1 z -°� � o G .°•oa4cr�.00 V L J C d y > L L�- r q E n• V q N 6 r A Z O G (C q 0= a V •^ t> O r` 6 y° r t � � i L V� C Or = yo Y3V�eiJG�� °v O � w G c O V• V y O j I y M T O • � it V OC�� -_H�� a 0 .n •. 1 � C M i y c q O Y C C� 4 Y`� I 1 C•.r `rL Or 6 r _� _upn ULT O C V O P � � Al OQ AGVOL n= ` -r � G NV �MrsP -J Vr•Jr. HN Gn <L E yV � Lw E V •+' O G A NAwq ON 6 E Lr� r C O E N v ci n O L G � I CT>•V c q_a or L �T M vNr s c =° =nW . °b u ° L _u v V iV q C G q ' 0 q n u p • r q P C L- V AN_q` SaJr V d u p= o c c d - N O u C N-. Z `E G..q � L a0 •� L u� 8 q° V Nr N�4c b'oo. oG m q ° 9 � ✓ L C u T✓ LLOe C'a -f G G ^J V N J f w � a n a. n z,. n d -VUN L�.y V N> l• V+ C • L v�OJ V c NyE N� N NuN- J�h -NVN •c �cnNC ✓� -o �V4. Lr TO L F � •^-� vrq °aau.r`✓ Pf —+ d_ srin q•+^ iV9 U � V 9 \I �Ca L dL a .ei n✓�. '° .n°a b 4 V L c Y N e OR nc' T P4 � v�° d ON�a'iTT�L z C q E r_i C C V V✓ = q p E LLa PL = LyC4>.�x q 4 ✓' L v q Pa N N`= o✓ v c � ` ✓ q O N � ` V C i 2v. M GO GNN � °O �j Ti�Q`a?o V� 6V•Tn wd��6 n n� ml I M ° °ca c voro• �aa c a°cr c o q ✓� q L u 4 -� C L U s L � V N — i� -+ C L L< q L 6 ° _ O =- L V O+ C L N p i �' u t. -✓c N V C S N ..- S V✓ nn iV` nL � ✓�✓ Eu L_- i N .v � T O° t_ \- � b= ° rl nv_ Oy L T _V T N G Y ✓ O- U L O O g f 'at6 y S N °qCC -+oz�. oN c T 4 O• zO >�rE 9,.> y.• gTrM 6 u O _• ` O T` O p � v P L P T d^ n L M b L u c ` �V 2 NOr^ •� C CV10 T L O L✓r q P v d CVj -J 4 -. 6 C V✓ G q C N u C CD` a'T N. q G = ^V^ L u C L b w M O N y b O q iT V O ✓ T G {' M O -29 6' q N wLL a q VC > ^.✓ t E'a p 4 O r_ V G`✓ C Py V= 10 C:;7 -u0 Ni-• VP OC LC HV_ =y•>q =.O•qV `� G° N nV �gCNn O p Tc�y d -�.L G a_G� L =a <L a G vqE -'- Cu -P C✓ °iW Vq...P l4� -- �'•° v�qo =� is GLT• T Qo .v «- qc`•� -✓i4�W -•iG L d .� L. 2 r .a 6 9 ✓•S C > 9 6� -FF.. -GC Ov. V l C 'C C el 5-E V J C a: T •^ O r co --5 ` ` >a °otoo c %.. m I �I al O ✓ d C d N d TL O � y V p _ U .y V S- O ✓� T c L 6 ° _ O =- L V O+ C L N p i �' u t. -✓c N V C S N ..- S V✓ nn iV` nL � ✓�✓ Eu L_- i N .v � T O° t_ \- � b= •-ir ✓�, rl nv_ '� G L T _V T N G Y ✓ O- U L O O g f O C J° T n V d C L q L G C T 4 O• zO E V n L M b L u c + Q E T Q > F N N 6 '^ '+ t V L O O q r V✓ O G •Oa V N. q G P= r ^ O'.j�N ^ -• q iT V O ✓ T G {' M O L °° M Y -V 6' q N wLL a q VC > ^.✓ t p 4 O r_ V C C -01 6- V -u0 Ni-• Vim_ N`O VP OC LC HV_ =y•>q =.O•qV `� G° N nV �gCNn O p gi•Li•L _ q - G 6l= J 6 ✓C C ` VO s:m c F ° o: n -- �'•° v�qo =� is GLT• T Qo .v «- qc`•� -✓i4�W -•iG L d .� L. 2 r .a 6 9 ✓•S C > 9 n C -GC Ov. V l C 'C C S 5-E V J C a: T •^ O r co •n C C ` >a °otoo �u °' W9�°cai °Lr _ G-N• °vri� 5r-o o✓„ ° c -- L T V° > 7z ai—ce C U 'a C V✓ C •^ _ O q_ TVP C y _ G. C r N$ P L L O Mq VN•-j� L ^W qL `CL vL.v C Cq_r r� G C -VN d C i -.. V° C V 'a V •^ C 6 ✓ �.. q i v r C% C F L_ V C p O p ✓ . C T qp G y VC CC C q u G� q� ✓- ..nL ✓ V o ° r 7L.• ` � F E qn0 N t' c 4� 6_ y c✓ n g O T d S n- v_ G q .V.. d n O V L 6 'S °� O a -_ V N u C L n r C Pq .V• L= L.O V On'. c qNW ^ J O N.=i� N �_4�.. q�_ q •C q`'C C �L r 0` O r` 2 d 4= L q q C V d C T g C C O L- W^ n✓ O✓ TL G 2. '✓ L• c -r dp-O V u ✓ G y0 q O G O C -^ O F N TC' G. u 4 V O E OO4P ✓ v b _ q 0... G _� -SJ N v. Q u C L C L - >- M .- C L� O V V O G G L E L J q q L✓ V q u n d V 4 L V M V V 62 O -• O E Z.2N G e — — 6 E✓ 6 p O P O^ ^ .-1/ Cal F y O I� �gmac c F>L•v °w -oa = ��� A a c° Norio O d N C > "��'•-� S l C V D -.2 ' N C b✓ V D L C V ` V d �j�j u _ l V } d C V � ✓ 6 0° Lcr4r' y ..✓ Lb•� E c-d� ,°e c ° c= ._� ,dr,� r.iL rOavi a O O y�'.•=.d j 7- L O ✓7 C" I� n _ y LLC >. qP ✓V COL O w i Y G r ✓ Pc L` <c o.¢de Va= e 'u.- q: — q I If "p—m �$� ` % r= °Nr goNc C• .l u C Nq P V C uS C �a,�rnm D�r_N uD qu�J >T N dcu d ✓d "� on ca `^rid- sion i m No �q m°'n "�>r ✓- or °r yOPP ` y d^ q q D V= Ln q' C J N q= R C C O 9 ✓ d J � V r - i'n a° •Cj V V O C q d a y� L re _ V q G CD° � CpCprr a rn NL Vu C q C ✓�� uC`CJ °d ✓Oy9d Dl Pro J=G L ✓O =a _ DyV O MO L ^ _ a. O >� f..1 O L= n q a V � - L C C •L.. T r u T L d N a QC d d L ` V N N O C l O ¢ d > f N P y L c N G C g -' V dq p O ? N ^ N d N P N N N b D C i Q✓ C .O °' q P O u d C 6 rDr T L N•°.. E� qGO ✓l ` O>•� ` 9 ,°, V �n.Oq O O ��C� °O O.r' NO l` T O G49� L C N qt J E =qYr C q Yd�T D C O r P_ Ld aC Y L? 9� V u c u ✓� � u m N g i ^ o ,.,L N � N q C d 6^ = q C L � 4 y L g V N C U q � O C� L `'� C✓ V 9 V O J j N 4;22 4T0 ^rJC G O G •D.r N b - O_. = -7 C C >�PO'�✓ � O• qa. N NoN N... �� ._ -✓ � .Z.5 .• qD °' ^_ y ' °:ce =q c °q .drn .Ld.. H °c -� o_ cG v 2 -r 'ct co GNINVd V_e 6q�p¢ tV F•Ny ,°•, L.O<6N V•L./ N N 4 20� JZ ^J P b � A O 6 6 ✓ •r~i C C =I E I q C V �CI OI L "• N e A =Y L y N a 3 d^ r ^ �1 N ej �aa V V� a_ ql Y C C .�•� Lam•..• V _ i tbw d_ O - O 4 L N i N C 4 = I O V � C L = O V V c 9 T Y • ✓ C o � L q =rc ✓ O ✓r. ° e O 6 � ` .L.r a e a q 7 � V ✓ >G < o n« L 0 C N a r O e 4 u q NN P n ca 6✓ tV O L C oo °y �vd d '^ q O P � V L q ✓¢ e I. as i� ¢ 4 V a� M = r C q J i 6 b n ✓ C C q N� 4¢ V n _ '°mod L Tdq C .. a N % d N = b � Cs u d p q ✓ LNz u u L d � d n•L.rt a 00 ` N 0 O N TV ^ C - i �NOS, ✓ ' L ✓ V m ` o 0 V V V L N L mil' 6 PO q O s _CC n - P C� O ^c✓ 4 N^ L ^ d n .7. u V >r0= CD N q�> A•O 6a Cr D ¢ ¢ G N O = P P L 12 " J L d V c C i w N a b r C G - � V •L.r 0 � = e = o 9 ^ L O 6 w 401 J� u u .-rice q- O p C d r ow yr � N>• qEr < q ¢ G a nN ✓`�o O O O q O y N- nD L =¢ Lb q y c aqD NLO L� N c P P C N V 4 y P •'i Y ��✓ aYP✓ P P V L a V c u u N O¢ s a o4o ^ gea.i 6 y d L O.0 L V O ND ^ � r C n O �a P = 9 q G b 7 q VV� qL ✓ ^ C y C Oaf O Lo E c r✓n it V t V q V` L O y n4 V ` P ✓ V ✓ L G +` ar mar .>vu o i r r d N d 4xA Ic O V V q V P d Oro V n r N�I 9 P C_ L is V -? n: u$= O L �O P V � x, O q^; E crn Lu E.°.P Q N•� c � V P 4r = n N V c 0 4 L. M 0 q q V q � N a � r ✓ N � P d= C a � ° C r^ O N = L r 4 i r nr N �S O j t d q P L P C ` Y � d L ¢ ` 1 S M O q 2 a P c q � O ✓ D u� 0 q = t q >d pC D ry �L d o n q V d ✓ L T 4 c O q q v Cr L •�i• 4 q O Du ¢ 9 4 q 4 L 4^ N�a d a 4yN � N Z Z-/,F e E Z V Ll C N O r q M.2 mid•' c e l -� V - O C V C > c =d`. Q j O 9 r V O T p r b d T O L L 6✓V d o b L 6y -_- O V G V N €vim A` o y u N n - ✓ S _ q aoV J da L o- � V W l d 6r O - r N a' L o c ✓ b •O.r � E FvM A .J w J .d^ NL c � v o v r T O V p F S � c i v= rr - L ^ V •^ O y a 6 r S L N J L` o _ s O b I p 0 � f •O• < N < « 06 O C C O C L6� G V Nj1 n 1 SO e L J C S p 9�p Ni ^ G Y Y ✓ L 6 V rr C G L � L 61 d q V O C4S.ji V -C� r q r y C o r E ,.E F � N ^i•YJ q Ldr - or y n• ✓ N W r C G q C y U 7 d IrV ` d d r� ✓ °v ir�Vu P� ^7 C d V -°o Lac A � � ✓ 6 O U C 9 0C9 ✓rcV b =o r Lcb .LryE$ N 14I s b n q E O O � p e T L q w L C y C m o ` V r C L O 4 N b 1W C - °c V V - E � W C Of u d P c G r- l d 6_ a p.n y N O i P C � C O_ O V ? � l V - - i Q_ O a Ez 7 j C d 'o d p L W d r J a L - c q_ - o y p V L y N c � 9 q ` O V- N N C' uI rl e b c a cP- •-J r m L � O � o _a y d I y o p „ E n i• e' V a c r` P 6 oq J J a d� C N P - c F Wtip N� L P ` C c� S ? Z. 4% v V 7 > o L � V � Lam] N 4J. p r _O c - U v$ C I z o N V P•O+ C -q0 O W V V P 9 a p O q ire 0 T � O q r V a p p d i e u P q J 4 b L «v cow v c 00 P « � 6 dPb r c y r ^ G i � c V V L C � 7 9 V � ape " c a S J u ^ - A � u • A C N S p M C w C � `u s� G P i✓ G V •Pd du - c NV� V Pw• 9 ycua ^. p ooh 4 PE vLb. C a O V r A u C d 9 d O' I q y a«N v L d ` d d p py a a - c S ` L - �O d Y d M N 6 r - 7 'f b •r P d - N 1y q ✓- 9 r r0 ✓ q a L n °l Cq •J - ✓- q V < G t� c d C✓ c O E m u uV ` ✓a c ro^ � ocP _ -- y•+ w o J ✓- oL N •e IV O •Ce�4p N d� 06 Fc` u ���, tp= •- LGtp � V «>rG�6 .O •J 9 ✓ tic v qp 1 - �•°„ =Y vE Ouq a IT � d Jat a �.oq O E � t W C V Z�> �✓ C •r O O b O q r y q✓ O O = i`` ✓ a C31 fl! O ni -yam q6 V i C L riG CNpt L t✓ qiJ OO V -.°.. dNi -q NDd j v •�may cdrt0 ✓`4 C_LV Nd ` =d S_ � M ° q d V �� • J t r u V V � C L �"� V PN O e L� Y G CJT �'•Ope T er r• to ✓c-�� 6t C qd 5 'Z v -ti vrE_ C- r 6 G r � p W W E I 6 4 V � q G 6✓ 6 � N 6 L r � q q —/ Q Y V ci L YV' d y r y oil E a GO ca- zo, L L c I " i M I v_o_ i'�,a,. Qc Ln aL �o�o e,$ LL i P }¢ E AM N V` `� = 6 . G q L O .L O Jr O � O L � N _ N I E .d. V n• d Y O V V _ O t O G C V rr � ` i � c- E u •� �_ L 4 s q . 4 N Y �L.. o I ern G aYL NL T- �O N- 4` J ,Ln l_V Nd rd L r�'� EO L O d V U N N� C N L q .0 9 C r. •+ d r — N1 q I ._gyp d dL NN NV Pam $^ C d O O g y q V L > O C} O Y N E u L � n L V u g r q V • O y L G- L 0 0 C r C c V N E 0` T.O. r dqM Orr •n _ oj0 —rl = L ¢ a e L� „ O�Vm6 4 6 P NL Lq0 �` oL ° }�'UeC Tacc yy g_E .. 4 v jam— g ZbL 0 _r C •L... O Va 4� �j6 LG —j L..G.p V•a yNL9 Lr y�OaL lu ° tJT Or O =Lq T��TL 040 G uLq �V Ta a Fp C �cuNO 00 O S Pq= wp0q Cpu. u -CE ^r Nru q L a � q °L9N Vq`�C LO•+ LOS NL`AP L nr q Nr n tr— n�^ L d CCN O� � d q b T} 6 V d d N �• O L w d L C G q r 0 _ Pro c u u n n C d g n n C i¢`• � ePc- C � a �"o,. qEO gc `N T r G MLO2 „ Go V _y° Y e q4 E n T .. G ° "� qua �� LN NqP °u o a•.�: O V G N O a L N Pu O y= y z V l C d O 4 r G L P PI V L O C nv V C V P PL =.� ¢Oy L E! V N L r N d ^ a C Y J V C V NI C( O � •I oI I 7 R E E N C E S J C 7 C b O E P O d r L, CI u- O C o �n Nd O O L ` ✓u O✓ r p w.. C] r I C N O T O .e _ c`i . q .w O 9 y P- O. O• L V y � O C O ` r o O.e r � C�rL✓ O � - � N J L w• q U ya; 11 7• ` 1 � C ^ C q N r L S O J 6 o a N 9 c N Z ✓a L Ld v d C L Y _- r Ly. L C d L, T 9 ✓ �� S O ✓ C L N y u d✓ N U v V U' �- q t d r✓ .`r W ca a a J � O N y Lu` gOL_ar O O L V O d nr ✓cc 9 d PLC✓ ° J7 � — c� p JN did ''1i go °CO `� ✓,d °V P n96 S L u L V L ✓C �� ✓ — O d 7 O v` ✓ W ��r 66N _ <: JT [] r Et _ of • c _ °_. _ _ Y F° =° a° N_ C `u ✓ q Cny q F Na N I r �•!� Ono 06 ° 6 N q Ir aqr S � _L 6✓ _ V S O O - • O n- - W 6 CI TD q W N G O f. O V7.r N S d O r. ✓ C _ C T ✓q_ VI V.4 c�y.� V r F_ q ✓ 9 C N q aL q O = Vt >N -mil C�� O C q l E E S J C 7 C b O E P O d r L, CI u- O C o �n Nd O O L ` ✓u O✓ r p w.. C] r I U y P- a L V y C O ` r o V~ �3 � N J L w• q U 11 7• ` 1 � C ^ C q N �' -� r L S O J ° ✓ o a N c N Z ✓a L Ld v d C L Y - V O'z P_r I✓ V U' �- q d r✓ .`r W ca a a O N y Lu` gOL_ar 6� C o Nd Nyya O L ` ✓u O✓ r p w.. I U P- a L q ` r o V~ q S L w• q U I ^ C q N �' -� r L S ° ✓ o a N i°�o ✓a L Ld d - O'z I✓ �- q r✓ .`r ca a a O y Lu` gOL_ar O O L V O d nr 9 d L. J7 V p JN did ''1i go °CO 2-t C-t ✓,d °V P n96 S L u L V L ✓C �� ✓ — O d 7 O v` ✓ W ��r 66N _ <: JT [] 6� C d Nd Nyya a L CyW I U P- a L ` o - O'z I✓ ` y Lu` gOL_ar T V °LOj nr S L u L V � L ✓ — a c Y r Et F° =° a° N_ `u ✓ q Cny q F Na N I r �•!� Cy v —q'y ✓ q ° L6 P u��= aqr � ` `fir � 4 • .T.� c�y.� n. aL q O = = V C L ` q l E aWVNa l C O A T D N d C d L r Y d J ✓ y� _ V O ° l N- L a O C O S µ � v L L ✓ L s' 4 O u V {'J 7 O :T V 'o y q O VQ a c T v _ V O EE I ^�Ci pp V V °C O _ � L F• T a �I P^ C T TVry V G V V O bon d V G q r .T O�� t �aN ca_o N y T^ C L V C n V U 9 V q c � u i a o H b = c,a Ns b a � 0 0 V 7 C. U °nom � � v L qL rS d N r >4� O _ d a. r d C a r 9 e N d P � C p SW 0 _ T O u V d r � m P .O.r 9 I r a t '�I O 6 v N= d ti I PL (� L vL •VC J P =W y °= 1 T /Jy L V V t_ L t u ° TC C q c u O ^ V S a d q O L U d x ° = n N V =dO r q a i N vE� 6 � V C a u O r r r v o° V 9 V L d V O A r N L 9 d � = o i G MV r > N d 4d V q >, J q b r O y osu s W= T_ 7 r i ^ O � C 0 P O O N n ° c� u S Y _ N o A G C b E � P C C C � _ V = P — c � 9 6 C r O _ i c 9 W O y 6_ dV a m M A r W c- �t M � ar u -Ti r P C d u O t a 0 M i a u a � u L �d O r b C ✓ r u P _ O _ Q V N 6 `ou C N S q W C� i F V C a u 6N �i L C N9 ode 4 9 x � N L b va o= C Z b E � d A� C -moo L � V � L 9 p f V �Oy v °nq a+ Q E 7 M 9 � w � c G C V g; P L l ic n T L A q «ds ora a c N 6 it O� CI °I V V C u L 9 N r v E r 0 9 v y n� 9 ^ V O w v d `o v L L 6 Q O O P L ° l d C a � q O E n .- E ` � C i G b 6 p Nl E 11 n C DkTE: July 11, 198 rq CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman,, associate Planner 19;, SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12590 - LEWIS - -K'-residential eve opment of t single family detached dwellings on 215 lots ranging from 3700 square feet to 10,450 square feet on 39.7 acres of land generally located on the northeast corner of Haven and Base Line - APN 202 - 221 -11 and 24. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map, site plan, elevations, and Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Development of 215 single family detached homes. C. Location: Northeast corner of Haven and Base Line. D. Parcel Size: 39.7 acres E. Existing Zoning: PC 81 -01 (Terra Vista Planned Community) F. Existing Land Use: Vineyard G. Project Density: 5.4 dwelling units per acre H. Surroundio Land Use an6 Zoning: North - Single Family Residential and Vacant; Low Residential South - Single Family Residential and Vacant; PC 81 -01 (Terra Vista) East - Vineyard; PC 81 -01 (Terra Vista) West - Single Family Residential and Mobile Home Park; Low Residential and Low Medium Residential ITEM F PLANNING Tentativ,: July 11, Page 2 I. Y t u. i s: K. P II. ANALY A. d! p` W, Ct S" w S, pf Ha T1 pl is cc ha ce al Ex fo wi COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tract 12590 /Lewis L984 .and Use Oesignationc• cJect Site - Medium Residential 4- Plan) ( 14 du /ac - Terra Vista orth - Low Residential (City's General Plan) outh - Medium Residential and Neighborhood Commercial (Terra Vista Plan) ast - Proposed City Park est - Low Residential and Low Medium Residential (City'; General Plan) ite Character tics: The project site is bounded on the east V Weer Creek Chanrel and on the north by the Southern Pacific 3ilroad. ine site gently slopes from the north to the south approximately a 2 -3% grade and contains no structures or 'ees. In addition, a portion of the site falls within the ity's adopted fault special study zone. r27icable Reaulati„ns: The Terra Vista Community Plan permits ngle family detached homes on 3,000 square foot minimum lots i the Medium Residential designation. ;IS: neral: This project consists of seven different floor plans th 3 -, and 4- bedroom arrangements. The proposed project nsity of 5.4 du /ac is at the lower end of the Medium sidential density range (4 -14 du /ac) for this sitr,. The oject has been designed with a variety of setbacks, lot dths and depths, and lot patterns in conformance with the n!mnity Plan text. Further, the street pattern has been signed with extensive use of curvilinear and cul -de -sac r�ets to further enhance the streetscape variety. Acces- ?1 be provided from Base Line and Haven Avenue via a new reet, Valencia Avenue, that will act as a buffer between this o s ject and the Neighborhood Commercial ite oen and Base Lira. on the corner cf is tract is composed (f two basic house products, all single Ril :nned as a ched 4,000 squaresfoothlot arearl hilelthe easterly half planned as a 5,00) square foot. lot area. •ner of Haven Avenu At' the northeast e and Valencia Avenue, r the tract design i`eeservIn the "A" �'OLO square foot Lot for a daycare :ernative subdivisionnlayout ha.sibeenoes not develop, an d bit "C -1 ". This alternative "A" would add as shown on additional r lots to the project bringing the total number of lots hin the subdivision to 215. - a 11 PLANN11G COMMISS "O;a STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 125901Lewis July 11, 1984 Page 3 B. Desiqn Review Committee: The Committee recommended approrai subject to the Io lowing revisions: 1. Increase depths of lots along Street "C" approximately 10 -15 feet and curve Street " where possible_ 2. Increase front yard setback variation throughout the subdivision with emphasis on Street "Cu. 3. To provide a buffer between the residential and the neighborhood shopping center, increase the parkway adjacent to Valencia Street to minimum 18 feet in width, and that the dwelling units along Valencia be set back a minimum of 15 feet to the rear or side property line. 4. Provide a combined pedestrian access way and storm drain easement on Street "C" adjacent to the Deer ® Creek Channel to connect with the regional trail system within the Channel and construct a pedestrian bridge to connect this project to the future City park to the east. 5. Provide high quality composition shingles wit; variable cuts, thicknesses and colors throughout the project. The applicant has incorpor-.ted these changes into the project as shown in the attached exhibits, except as follows: five lots along Valencia Avenue have rear or side setbacks ranging from 10 -13 feet, generally as a result of maintaining a minimum 18 -foot garage setback. C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant, is attached -or your review. In addition, a portion of the project site is located within a fault special study zone and a supplemental fault investigation was prepared by the applicant and reviewed by the City's geologic consultant. This report concludes that "the inferred Red Hill Fault does not exist as a near surface feature at tM s tract and no surface Cisruotion due to faulting is expected." Further, this project wili'construct a storm drain to collect flood waters that currently drain onto this property from underneath the railroad tracks. The storm drain will contain this water and divert it to Deer Creek Channel. Based upon completion of Part 11 of the Initial Study, staff has found that no significant adverse impacts not addressed in the Environmental Impact Report will occur. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12-590 /Lewis July 11, 1984 Page 4 III. FACTS FOR F,NDINGS: This project is coas?stent with -:ie Terra Vista Planned Community Plan and the Gene -al Plan. The project will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed uses, building design and subdivision, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval are in compliance with the Development Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for public hearing in The Doi v Reoort newspaper and the property potted. In addition 37 public easing notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. V. RECUIMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all material and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for findings and Conditions of Approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and 1 issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectful•? submitted, Rick Planner AG: L-�-:jr Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Init'.z;; P;solut "A" - Location Map "B" - Site Utilization Map "C" - Subdivision Map "D" - Detailed Site Plan "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan. "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan "G" - Elevations - 700 Series "H" - Elevations - 717 Series ,I" - Elevations - 733 Series "J" - Elevations - 732 Series "K" - Elevations - 791 Series "L" - Elevations - 798 Series "M" - Elevations - 799 Series :tudy, Part I on ;f Approval with Conditions 3' I./ 11 L J C E r m ss". +� MAJOR GREENWAY y3 SYSTEM �jtit{rOC� ••••• MAJOR TRAILS SCHOOLS o son 1000 ism jSale in feet �.o, - - - - - -- ,.T. Md`1� "' 1 M 4 M ff", M M LM ` �!j NC CITY OF RANCHO O CLC -VNIONGrA In-c N \I \G DIVISION L\Ii?MT- sc:lLE: � -5 NORTH SITE UTILIZATION AND NATURAL FEATURES MAP TENTATIVE TRACT N®. 32590 -- IN iNC CfiY or uwt'NP C lmowa / cl{IN1Y or M}I {[�NMPiNp riprt or CwYVOewP — � � ��_ A. � -- _l�� _ _.�r � %\}'��� -% Lam, -i �' �..1.' -., •` �' / \ =..i, � y ----TRI►t'f��NO NORTH CITY OF ITEM: R�NTCHO c,,`L ALNIONGA FLAT I INI JIVLSnN F- XHIBir --15- SCALr-: <►- , z i Icr 1 yJ n I rr I fm_ 1 Ll f 9 S r or JI d rr I fm_ 1 _ w 1� ddI�I : WY fiY� O TEN'T'ATIVE TRACT NO. 12590 p TSE =" Or LLMCSO CDCAMON" COOMrT OF SAM SESMAIRI M0 STATL O CANiOSMLR. DE.+ns°. 1983 n.. 39.7 AC- 4000 sx- Lo» - SS LOTS (4000 ". LOTS Wl" ALTESMATE -Al - ff LOTS WOO St. LOT! - ale LOTS w �+ CITY OF rrEM: _-7v 12-4519 RA \CFO C UCAMONGA n7u: �� C!7E 1AA- PL:%N - 1I \G DiVISnN EXHIMT- ��SCALE= ,�f' % Ll 9 S _ w 1� ddI�I : WY fiY� O TEN'T'ATIVE TRACT NO. 12590 p TSE =" Or LLMCSO CDCAMON" COOMrT OF SAM SESMAIRI M0 STATL O CANiOSMLR. DE.+ns°. 1983 n.. 39.7 AC- 4000 sx- Lo» - SS LOTS (4000 ". LOTS Wl" ALTESMATE -Al - ff LOTS WOO St. LOT! - ale LOTS w �+ CITY OF rrEM: _-7v 12-4519 RA \CFO C UCAMONGA n7u: �� C!7E 1AA- PL:%N - 1I \G DiVISnN EXHIMT- ��SCALE= ,�f' % t 46T .1 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12590 COUNT:l T"Il Cl—*y OF 2ANCHO CUCAMONGA of S N BERNARDINO SIATZ OF CALIFORNIA 7:7 ��f i I Ll-lt 14 SIZZ IM22= 4 FA P-W 4ATr I z5 CITY rrE.Nl- RANCHO CUCNTN,10.NLGA nTu: PLkINNING DlNrISION EXHiBrr- scAL.E- N-;- s. 'S. 4, Ar NORTH lJ 1 TENTATIVE TRAC'r NO. 12590 IN THP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFOPNIA me SEE i t� a . - -42 oi' _—' � _ i GAL �c�y_;✓ � �� V' •.1 °�` `,z °'� IA - J � � / �O Sil[LLT SLCTtON o-- -�A� L }1• Yom+- 1 ' -M5 1 ROAD 11 vm�qgs AXE= to" "WEN AVENUE / / ♦ W r �CITY OF rm\l: wp zq o R S CUC TMO\TGA Tnl-E: MAr P PLANNING DlNr ON EXf iII3T- 6f *P CALE- o J- 9 ir I I`iS' jr". J a �Y i ge!— + i —,,-.rin h vµ•.c5w �� -- ALTERNATE -A- CI'T'Y OF RANCHO C;CAMONGA PLANT;NlI \'G DIVISION I wl r,' 1 a i -1 ; •� �� 1 1 i 1! I 7 ; E' L i NORTH ,� -/6 ITEM: a� TITLE: E1HlrJT- V SCALE. • 0 DETAILED SITE PLA! TENTATIVE RACT - NO. !2590 `�/'/� ' A Y�I[ OiY 1.I .a.C.O NG.iOYG LM.IA .r.O aT C eYC w euro•.0 I wl r,' 1 a i -1 ; •� �� 1 1 i 1! I 7 ; E' L i NORTH ,� -/6 ITEM: a� TITLE: E1HlrJT- V SCALE. • k a e x� I \ i i u �i ;;� �fEpE�T�tAN / CcoWZC.noN i 1 mgTwis. SffZ sa" TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12590 P ill[ cm OI COP1MlY VI 1M �[t.MW�O w[n or cealww i ® CITY OF rrEM: _ _ Wry Q RANCHO CL'CANIONGA. mu; 4.. AmM V PLNNN1 \G DIVISION E\HlRM T-7 7— SCALE. •� J'/f p f - +l V NORM ','_ .': �;:� `.� r' �i�` •; ?; :' _�,.:: ``mod ,, . :��. J. a .. r -� ,. �.r -. a . •: `' 11, ar :. 1 9... E ...E L� �r �4 V! V 1Yt[L�6 gyp CITY 01' ITEM- ��?O PLAML \G DIV",SI N EXHIBIT - V- SCALE- ° NORTH �1 1 1� • i .'r _ 1 .1 i •1 L 0 j - - --�_ y C I PRELIMINARY GRADINC AND DRAINAGE PLAN TENTATIVE -�'.- TRACT NO. 12590 _ IN INS Cay OT MAIIGNO CO WNNG O t COUNTY O" SAN NGIXANOIXO STATE Of CAYIOfXM �R,.. -.. ` _4444__..._._. -_. 4444... _•_.: OtccrNEN. IYNs 4000 N.6 LOTS - IS LOSS 14000 LY. LOTN .11N — AL1t..ATt -An - I. LOTS t' a000 S.I. LOTS - 111 LOTS Pn AN _� - �y TYnC.tl toT ONJfX4Gt R•I 11 3¢ ar¢T a �I f CI'T'Y OF rrE.%t: --IE`Z RAI'CI -TO CL'CA� IO \Grp T U: = PLANNING DRI SION EXHIBIT: SCALE: --VQY KAY V NORTH i 1 als r i \ f e I ttt .w.r rele tell r ;4` X77_ c` , rOy , I w� PXMMINARr GMAei& AND CrAINAGE FLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12590 u Tt t T Or MAMCM0 M"WONCIA LOOMTr Or eAM eCeMACOtMO titTt Or CAW..M DLCK"am Lees _ Ze_r AG toes ".LOTS •t toTt It000 ex. LOT* ra. ALTZU":t -A-) - "LOTS 1000 ex. LO - 111 LOTS /r I1'1 / LL Y a I � Hi J� 'I wry rAe r , �_.) •ra 1r� r.re r h f/ i/ � NORTH CITY OF ULM: 7T 17051b _ RANCHO CUCAXIONGA TITLE: 9S%dA=Wc= PL1M''NING DIVISO N Etf ilMT- '' SCALE: is` r� L PXMMINARr GMAei& AND CrAINAGE FLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12590 u Tt t T Or MAMCM0 M"WONCIA LOOMTr Or eAM eCeMACOtMO titTt Or CAW..M DLCK"am Lees _ Ze_r AG toes ".LOTS •t toTt It000 ex. LOT* ra. ALTZU":t -A-) - "LOTS 1000 ex. LO - 111 LOTS /r I1'1 / LL Y a I � Hi J� 'I wry rAe r , �_.) •ra 1r� r.re r h f/ i/ � NORTH CITY OF ULM: 7T 17051b _ RANCHO CUCAXIONGA TITLE: 9S%dA=Wc= PL1M''NING DIVISO N Etf ilMT- '' SCALE: is` e' Mow .` H.wl {w T[1 }I/wCD SiYCCD L. ]a. TI11Y � }.IICaI O ME FRONT ELEVATION a+�bb�t►' OC LJ Z1 FRONT ELEVATION w.w•v. Ir.-.11 .TYCco CwuYe. �— — co.C. T,L1 .001 41 DG 01:06 0000, T m - TTFC.LL L/ OO V FRONT ELEVATION 11 ]. ro rotas {.wo[ Yo.woa L. T.n j�_i6• aT w.wva vl.YlrT10 vewT v vx .a .ono wn V \_i I:CRTH CITY OF ITEM: _ Issin � t"Z'� }CHO C "-� 'L \IO \GA TITLE: PLANNING DIVLSIO.N EXHIBIT= 924ow 1 SCALE- E o.ow.a ..ice as .rc�wr�•raowaro Pam -- �•�•'?ur�CLanMw:f - .2?^! M.+Oifl'rJ 40 N�Zl M r i la a) Z O a w w W n t!: F La w 1 C w s w m c� r:7 i CiM1t3l i� • .awa. ,aw.nPe La,w eo.. _ ;�___��_��_ _ a. OOS'.1 row;IA Vt ;IA tl1 tlUH31 _ am. asrun.a.>m. aria ax � y pp o.ow.a ..ice as .rc�wr�•raowaro Pam -- �•�•'?ur�CLanMw:f - .2?^! M.+Oifl'rJ 40 N�Zl M r i la a) Z O a w w W n t!: F La w 1 C w s w m c� r:7 i � 4 I-- — na,.wso >nrco a...a, a. 10 ..3CL usae soups <,ncu ses ,s.+- a.s><sw na„mfa sneco 7`11 FRONT ELEVATION I 0! FRONT F� FRONT ELEVATION �. - co co.c,ns sep ane ..,nt - „s,cK 7= LP FRONT ELEVATION 11 •xu w.sos vum na,osas a,sec CITY OF ITEM: ���'Z a � RANCHO C:CA- MOYCYA ITT TLE: _� S PI iNNL \G DIV ISION EYHIErr. SCALE= �- 1 � Y � t I /IL •' {y _- V N { I. •. y rJ . .4- �W.RfOINNt }1Yn N��{•W jjN�Y�f %����f�'��Y,' ilrlr�.i:r 1. �I:....��r4�n.."wi.i �_. ^^,����""••''��� ._.> _ Ifp..M�MNIISYfI�IWN411in'•'IN. W �.• wlr.mi•:.. ��mlwY�'7."LmlowIt�I�yurola� .MNW \iy71...IIb.e.l�y. Ns' O dY. {y _- vwt�rrn �e sever: ttti� f. Lui �.+.a „+ena000v� -- a+urrt�_s�_ 7worwf+ •a"awsa.a acre sa.uaam. = — =r_ _____ -_ i iiiQ • DaSZt 'Ow y�ryl an:crtH3t =•---- •— = > ---�� � ' _ ;.4 TISIA VHtM nat�aaa aoaaaaa a np ..a..a ...r .or aan un.an.aarc a.aa eu � a s r 1 ^u L' ti i TL�- � o r l -ao .!E V V to Z ui G SZ FN LLS A F ti LC LU W O F 2 C7 r.l moz11 u J st E 11 E ,.o._,.., Ypr.y3. 404M IJ OTYI, iV1�:.1— rr eo —C;�/ i t�Y04Ty IO f)1,0�4u1). LYMl)111T)1191Y1 Y1YY0'J � i]Ea YYYOfNJl•J.C,TY06LTnY ruin V}Ja331 {e —C;�/ i r 3' U M L�r- FFIONT ELEVATION a.. Issw `J1AC.L —" •rre [tn � ssraeo wr • \a• o�ro �cosevTw i Y � tYY.sw rasrutco �r.� �T� sratco � a.. Ttf\ -rmcu oa.let+T\o\ ..Y s"Q FRONT ELEVATION •awsamowr a�v� II]M sc-• u I.ires7.. 12513.�3= V CITY OF FRONT ELL VATION RANCHO \iCHO CUCATMONGA PLANNING DINUO-N �ttavft Ttp itD6 tva�o �4 YtDYe tbWll I \ii[\ -i-ITIy: _ T� LA no-31441—p £\Iiii;•I•: Zpa- I SCALE: -- a.a env. or sau eosroamor ors. a.a ear ,wsaxs sow .M ,a - a.a nv w spas n n•. as• •.y .� _ �•°•xs I � wn s sonar r roos srcrrxgxr�^ � y gyp-- / ry ^..F C ` \i t I � ..•. a. • siruaarso rerr Ell Nt FRONT ELEVATION • a.s rrar =T�1 FRONT ELEVATION r— cf•ra,.r.es r.I. . STM, aru so.sos ns esv .ee.ar eww� sr .amer •s.a.l�. •.es. CITY OF RAyCHO CLCAT:OeGA PLANNING DI VMN- ITEAI- !TF Tom: a. ��� r•rrrrM�wr�S�.s .. / CITY OF RAyCHO CLCAT:OeGA PLANNING DI VMN- ITEAI- !TF Tom: a. Cl M:% _B 1 6" ' i n y al,i� Z ILI. III Ii• tell II'. �i 11111: 1;�;1.I: C tu J i¢ 4 u 0 F3 �s !r3_ i C s Ell 9 E Cl- El i I a ° i 1 I i VT i r 5 uu ®iw �n..nu a�w.r oonir� nom• www wa w.. VINHD1f7YJ j0 9'NQt SIM3l C: Cl M:% _B 1 6" ' i n y al,i� Z ILI. III Ii• tell II'. �i 11111: 1;�;1.I: C tu J i¢ 4 u 0 F3 �s !r3_ i C s Ell 9 E Cl- El i I a ° i 1 I i VT i r 5 " ft-rra 9q A FRONT E-EVATiON c` FRONT ELEVATION I NORTH CITY OF f W 7 RANCHO CT �C ALMONGA &t!g: � ---r PLAININIENZ DINTOON EXHIMT eel SCALE- L-1 I I I � rC" .y6r wlal au.nva vuulOr _. - z.n l...uaw °A.oR YINH6JfTlJ j053WLxi SUllil Cj Sa n,�aamwt,r.as 6GSil'ON 17114 ULL� tl15N tllt1l3L --------- S�olt.nttS mLii aonamnnwl.am aww. i e ! n�i a ..ww a....s i-I 'illy.. rl C. 1 us cl El 8 LU \ ® W Q. tu Q ALL 1 Ir_w I O I � 1 , E a r 1 j }ry, � ml sul iJ �c � 110 I a e 1 I � rC" uit r. L] FRONT ELEVATION Ei 11 FRONT ELEVATION NORM CITY OF ITEXI, R.Al HO CLCANIONTGA PLANNING DIVMON EXHIBIT- SCALE- �, I now.r �olnn vnaaoi>'� j0 SrwoN s�M37 � vu.rwm.owun n asslAaaa3l u.... moo •.www � E: [ 6'U a 7L z LF--3 COI �Illli VU J n' lil r o sir• u:,:,u ;� yr o �I :it J cr ul Q g i9 i r47I i Asp O I • � � O� •arw ..nrae. �uw.9c.. •••O/T1> V•/.pm W!/9• tMp__IIII_7 /O_9aw_py aY'.9l Si•1 .s `{^n\\ tL9a 111/— / �_ =='�= t 1 R - stssViyq yy yur yaHa f rw1a9 /na aon aea 9a•p� -1 - . •l, z rim O On P 4-f Lu s Lu LU r 1' I' II f I OI II'III — 1•. tii i 4 � IIIIIII L'I I hJi� t I I - O I • •l, rim 4-f s i 4 i. a � r 11 CITY OF RANCEO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Enviromnental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the initial Study. The Development Review Co.*amittee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which tine the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROZ-ECT TITLE: Tentative Tract No. 12540 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Lewis Homes of California _1156 N_ Mountain NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Richard Lewis: Same address and telephone number as above LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 10600 East Base Lire Road LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, `'4GIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: 1-1 IR PWVECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT: 215 single family detached homes on lot,; ranoing `t, to in a ;n cn_ t't ACM-CE OF PROJECT AREA AND SuJARE FOOTAZE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 39.7 acres Existing Buildinas: 0 R DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION JN TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPEIMES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH .u'ECESSFRY SHEETS): Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of c=ulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? I -2 J-.3,-'- en E WILL HIS Pi'%WW-E : YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial chance in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flamaables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I *hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of say ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of say knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information nay be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. n Date January 6, 1954 Signature'`�:L Title AuY"rorized Aaent 1-3 RFSIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION LI The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planninc Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Levis Homes of California -Tr. No. 12590 Specific Location of Project: North side of Base Line Road, 1970± East of Haven Avenue PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 65 73 77 215 2. Number of multiple family units: 0 0 0 0 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 6/84 10/84 2/85 go 4. Earliest date of ovcupancy: 11/64 3/85 7185 215 Model € and $ of Tentative 5. Ledrooms Price Range "700" 2 -bdrm. $84, - 87,000 7 8 7 22 "717" 3 bdrm. $92- 96,000 14 13 14 41 "733" 3 bdrm. $88- 92,000 11 13 11 36 "732" 4 bdrm $87- 89,000 10 6 12 28 "791" 3 bdrm 594- 98,000 9 14 12 35 "798" 4 bdrm $91- 94,000 6 10 10 26 "799" 3 bdrm $84- 87,000 8 1 -4 10 27 9 3, 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12590 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12590, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Lewis Homes, applicant, for the purpose of s- ibdividing the real property sitcated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of CaJ "ornia, described es a residential subdivision of 39.7 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Base Line and Haven Avenue into 215 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on Ju'y 11, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered othe^ evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12590 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is rot likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design, of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the propused subdivision_ �—,33 Resolution No. Page 2 (9) That this project the environment issued. will not create adverse impacts on and a Negative Declaration is SECTION 22: Tentative Tract Map No. 12590, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISIOPi 1, Whenever the regulations of the Terra. Vista Community Plan differ from the standard conditions, the Community Plan regulations shall supersede those of the standard conditions. 2. The end of the following cul -de -sacs shall be landscaped and irrigated by the developer: Streets "B", "C", and "E ". 3. The pedestrian easement between Lots 51 and 52 shall be fully improved by the developer including sidewalk, landscaping and irrigation. Landscaping shall include canopy shade trees, shrubs and ground cover. !)etaiis shall be included in the final landscape and irrigation plans to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 4. A ped strair. bridge shall be constructed across Deer Crsek Channel at the time of development of this project. Detailed plans and flood control approval shall be submitted for approval to the Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to issuance of building permits. 5. A minimvn: 15 -roo usable flat rear yard area shall be provided er all lots per City grading standard drawings. 6. If mot "A" is to be developed as a daycare center, institutional use or other quasi - public use, approval of a Conditional Use Permit shall be required prior to recordation of the final map. T. The detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall include the median islands and wall details for Base Line, Haven and Valencia Avenue. Also, a cross - section of the planting concept for the Valencia Avenue park-way buffer shall be provided. x-36 r U E Resolution No. Page 3 ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. If this subdivision develops prior to Tentative Tract 11606, a debris retention and channelizing basin shall be constructed on the north side of the railway tracks, an easement and maintenance agreement will be required for such facility. A concrete or gunite ditch shall be constructed along the north tract boundary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Necessary approval and /or permit shall be obtained from the railroad for any construction within their right -of -way. 3. Adequate structural provision shall be made to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to convey Haven Avenue runoff from north of the railroad through or around the tract. 4. The proposed storm drain easement on Lot 121 shall be designed with a provision for emergency storm so water overflow conveyance to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11th DAY OF JULY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairmian ATTEST. Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission field on the 11th day of July, 1984, by the following vote- to -w.t: AYES: COWISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: J -37 Ni O G D i G s =Y -Ty_L L •.' C' O C < pY.Y•GO�V -uyC pO iTL yJy_C„ C- .�C - r 0 9 T E.^ .•�J• c t- u w — `• 9 V O C V J6 nO Ou .Lo. E M^ •^ ¢r cu Cb - �E c- .d.• •C „ V f J y L G D� V N �cn a3 L¢vi c° � Tc 'G C a.j -J ✓ O G =y_G- N�cyL - L ' -oLr va -au =- l °a vi pLaL nOC•r' Ta w 0_ O •a L C No -"yG cL rr O L `LI= aVSNGV f •Oi• �9fr v 0 i 0 r G c 0 O 0 Q c u N � O - J � n hi L „C L- � C O n c7 � o `tea — ` c NNE.` O p aC O N ¢ 9 G w 9 ooc�c -- n a V `• V T C a r V �oN oqa C y2 L O 9 a L p L Lry y r = 4 a' C O C N oiso'•• o °RNs• ^ P4 Pr > C C d O v V.pi 0 4 L N p > O. • � F. N G C 4 V v �•pvc I c N- E Va �Nn of O i n a 0 O L V e i 6' V O .d 3 2 O ofV 4 `u V J p J p G v O � V V— N • u y y C C O n^ i o N V y V AdllbL c o L T s.r e=. I e r - V y 0' N .°..• •� • L LOS Oi v_ L 1 r >4 L „N N `•� -o��� �L'a a�� rte« rnq i �co w 2; - OL d= TO•ey � i EE.wip�TS� G Y V 9 O 6 V V�� � —lG ..•Q CCV OCR Cy•G U� StV Ec • uu L V QoG c „e g° - - o f! a time„ o 79 8 =a qro N N ac°,. c - wL c+ ._. no rm a �r ycAr ((••//nN �— V M •a O P 6= O N d M G c 4 w J= C N IN y Y > C^ _d T V E` a S6a E=L L L Ny Oc• � Oa./O "�'�E N�a CL' 6 �L N C 00 ^J6 dO O° • �N _JEV «V tarn V O Nq V c^ > ^ o c GM�W�i <oeo wL.c ai O V .�• OIL ms 6 <o<u N • I I e o - V y 0' N .°..• •� .O.• V a c o 0 1 r >4 L „N °'« rnq i �co w 2; - L EE.wip�TS� G Y V 9 O 6 i ° L a ne' v QoG c „e g° - - o f! z rt«� �— V M E v u w' nL Q V Y C^ _d T O S6a E=L L L Q V L G -r APO n� Tr q C ^ o q Qr � O V .�• OIL q T ` d` a C �« 6/ O O IO.V.�.)CLLC 7 I «r- uoiy,o,. L N L M g r F J •1 NI MI !I {I ti�� El i `VV•I 1 O Z V Q G 11 C V O ^� j Q C r• �� 7 - 9 7 .Y ` Gr .0. N C r a ✓- r r Op C, q O V V ._.. ° � N o QG d � N r ✓ � t p O q L N .°i, � C fs Vi✓a ` �oc .. W"2�d. q _'G q L N N° C .r V O V Vf > �_ N I ✓ P •o ~rCV 9�OG iV 4i^ a'L rcC✓ °.°+n a a V' L ^^ C .NnL Ed N C c rrE y =✓ -C•a DOE ✓L.�a` "_Tp � ^`^ V C q p 1J JN T�da V �L j PV TG l0. ✓C � a�.°..O Ny dr q V U Troia -'... N.L.. N ,°- r ..^ d `' > q _= ". L•. Vo ✓mod ^� ^E> '��9 P_ VM1` ^rte V� LO 'a �qT '�rjN `C9C•O LwrVar NON NCq _ qP9 Cpj Vr 'q r L Nago c .N. PVC r V C 9 H d i l .... T O P N° N j a q'• t r N L C V a c c� 0 eLO cc .Ji, Oa V]O_a VUYrr VrNS .ca t� u N. ^q`Y OqY GTLG _ N Vli J ��� erP ✓N d L yL tL a ' N L V C O .J OI d N� P r 9� .0 y -J 9 J 6 •o C> owgc� d mLa``'°. eicd.•ri.o oro° �� YzM° uwoc a °.+p J� q C C C T V •O ✓> V � r q a a� `N . � V ac= A 1 � P° •- Q ^ d '- {A L I Y d V CO' eC 0✓� 6 . �� j p C 6 O ptJ 6 .Li .]r. O 6 •`e .r m u N CIy ,Dui LV °a gj La: l OCL OGV OuC C'"O. t� qr° ql 4q N`• >-0 G. N OO VrL °� N .L i 6ry a yyL V r_ N �r L yN yNi Lqc, L.. � as €adiY Upi '0= Ccr SS Ca.-J -V].n dVr� d�T CYap F r_ v , HxOeV V`'rc °' ^ ^y vL'^pV bq.' o.2 vjty C a d ,a O r C 41 Y ^ C N✓ q r O.`. p ^. N l� 7 � ro q�^ N ^� N ° a P 6 q 9 0 a 0 w� _. P 2 C N Y` ° � C C N � V C O Y I ✓ O ry Jna P .N.. 1-d= O F �-M C ✓P a N dq .Li.l NC° L� Ca r C��> E a` Or l• -P q� .r° E.Z. q 9 y G c 6✓ T 2 a .� Q .'n R Y° ✓ d i r C r 9_ O C a n °a cd4 t, ✓Z9 q rs °cw LAP> dL COO..'. iQ'or q ? TL' a L c yr I EL sod °a•v.F �^ ..'o'.geq . =Ma ¢�ic$e � �° cMr_ dJ Q9 c ^79 + C� �y °PL ay aE..Oir eO.JOd [] L LO.I ]1a0 >rC -J^ a ._Ct LV. NCL6 r PL °CV r q P C C V N d d y_ q c r V J< a q `_ r a 7 C 'V a O C C n g C f O e n q 20 O CdgL °L C O O ✓6LUJ aLn = 4 G'� 4 d g N C -'Z, S^ �rt9 VGV > d V o •°i• O. C J O< _ CCdU �� ° g09b r• -q ^ Pa d C ar C .Tir C N.Ce C V J ° 4 p O p✓~ r La ✓ j �a T NV dq iW q C.. LETJN P�dc d9` CL .. OrrN OIL CCO VY C��r V6YCa0 GgL.�Y ° -' — V N J L P M' O _ d V a� E> q �� M a N q .� t V J w 0 6 d q � P� F G L N d M � c q ruY Gq ... Q.06 C6rLL -3� N ^ae :J CT L'r Ll 7] 11 q, S '• E�'J D D u O �� V T d 0 V O d D d d N C T G T O a .`J A u ldl W ` � d L N J � � 10 +o +J rn ^v � y .`o M a a� i�i✓ N l ✓ C C u L yvL N V � C N G 0 V A ti N .Ai ✓ V C Q� p o .`o J N V .� � C A O O q� d . Y x P q O Z V L L c O N Y✓ V N T C P d m p Cgg O d .. O Cc = tyl q V y ✓ q J a v v .ocE � � T O l P = �J L .- q c .+ C q' C+ C> V N � T� ✓� p L CU VLD „N r d q �^ OIL G P ^Cq _ P C C q d � U P n O ✓NAG D T.�.. = N u D Y d 3 4 0 6 L q J G N `✓ d V q ^T =DD `� �C.P `V•6 V�d U+ q V_ cND� LO_CG > > CuV 7LV V • q d q •...'O�VV .qiV Cq ON ACrC °d �r E r r VPn dNV�� 6 =0 V C rLirG9n b •n ✓ L Cq L_ q C N ..dy` V^ y Leta l C O J V L_ C d ✓o•L+ �dC .q = +j +� EZ +P✓L .biL.q -r d✓60 A .Dr ` +✓ � ✓CV d L 4 Vr✓- V 'r 00 O D d^ L d O g C D L a•N M ` c V - N 6 N O j T. LcgL P V _ Le• N +^ q ✓ _. >,L area ° r i ^ .o N o c L uv NON'O VLd ^ ='i Cq�V LC _.� V9DY - d V C ydL C'•6C VN V}•�•C'i NV dr+ L� LC L N N6� �EOd �Od>M d V N N C r� '• V Pt L. Ca.i P L c T d L C P L d q >t Y l nq ✓= ✓!J ..✓O N_ ✓' N CD.°poLp �^ q V � � ��Lq PL f`)rn✓ �.�•.- j 9 q C^ u d C C c r P C ✓ N d d c c ” g N C ` g o y na. ' + c J °ey.n v q x vL N v o v E dN' q'.D °c T•d Lpd «.rPr ^\...� vcdcAo o PO_og n��j`P vo `�,: i`_ ✓a.a cc ^ « c A c � io^O. eco r °C'• r C�+r� P ` 4 V� NL _ ^AO` `xN•+i•W 9•rCd r C ^Ovr OryOV ^ ^•L.•LVV JC ^_ .J C l P N✓u✓ N � V .. C O d V'` V V C d 4 t G✓ O y+ q V _b.+ t Q �Cc ° C✓ « E ODA�q aOgO r PL c PL Y e� N: S b bLnLy o MG b �e °� e '^n " oa rd °� L VLd L dno ,G qe c c a f nom` oc-. NTU° L✓,.a N = d\pn o d �+ N� o y .� ✓ L.A�a E O q N L ✓ GI e O t g L C E pE q O rLrr � rr V L L 9 L O r q d p • d C d Z_gll to ^ A+ q .. L P +'• v D N O L � Gd• �j LC W VD NNC« +DOr+ir N. >•..V� d2q ✓` C(l O xL ✓E O y y O C C C E.� n P w � V N V O ✓N d P > G Nom• q b� �O< i p Cq FN�`J `` N _ C NO O•r i4>V' G9 t^ `ON ..rNJ .� GN l � WW V6\ � J Dn A Vq �•.. d C q✓ G +COL gOV�s y qF � >•Jy` N� ^q r`o .L.V NNLI ✓9 =C — qL�� I d ^p d L Yy L Pq +p VILNd cq +� Lc d O J V Tr^ d d V O O .. � °'• C Y P ^'•c \ N O V✓ t q 6 A- c O q L rV.dn �� qO d + >rr - �i ^LgaA M .dr qy rM Gt+ VyOA QO L6 °xq Yn Ad y OOJ Cd) �0 «�C dL0 .O c O D U r c ` q b •r C C P C N ` ✓OP I.1 .• d O qy J N D'. 0>nq VuNw E��d�e o eC'• y ^ goggl^ •^La va` �� VJ 'J C.F� V N 9P =N U` d^ WA nL�Ji• y � NM � L l ((\u� L' P V A G P C y ✓ O✓ L ^ L t✓ L 9 b OCR x L C � a n � y !1 r O c V • n✓ V C N � � � s j i u ` G b i d O �. I O^ r q d 7Z \e �T. wIOL bd0 L!'•Y r0✓`�. I a t �! PPd 7N nd qd y nc+ Jed 6N DS \OJ `y + �•`�rdw` r�r b•N.. E N7D ✓ T y Y L d V ^r> L OL � O d g q V .' C O,iy ✓ VHOn V d i Cry 6Vr✓ir HGr°n 6V < V ryil�y O S ajr.Od L✓..L EM1P .Li •uj� < � < O.A udN06x N � Ncyr G N+ Z NO H NZ 0 Ll 7] 11 Q zz ¢LGE Tq -VV �•.� LFVq� LN pN Tm L d � !)�V�� �I 6 `'<I F rn C O L O - O O � [•• - E O , � � - - � C ° G- ' U' I � U C d G 9 N V j C} N r •� � G � L 9'O - -JP _� NL�6L � G �� U- r '•G" Obi yqq � °ar �V P ON j^ NG d WI �� V S V C 9rr•• C V� y w y O N� � d T _V �� L• N t V� G% r g G T L • G �� O G V q d q, - ••-•� -I = O OP Vpr.°•• -G -- �J� ��O _ -1 q`VN Uq `CV�r t r- FN OZ Cyq�L �• mu y� NO Vd -N�9 �Mrr N C f 1 Lq qV =I -G6` a -y a i4 °v = LVLCfj� pV qNG Cu V ^t ? o_ 'r T� rE V >•q G- L � rTUE GMm G -r _ LE we v '�j FVr•'• P9 VrV �Td V 79 EC v 96 a•L Gl ° y ° q 21 a= V = V V J Q _ a V rn_ OL f• C- d o WI 2T2 CV�� LOy d r7 _d r r °V �r °u 7Or G CG �•t -cvy oTNV^ q xc °G� �a v -c -c rar _ IpIp �� °uL v v -•o pp o,c G' -° _ J G l O N- p V T � r c •. W O V i i N � V° `� O. �•„_Y ATT' Vn n N Cr O� `NW or- ' °o c a Lv GLV,V -oar -.n N � .`o_= " ��•_ �JGV9 l ry:N O =,VVC! A7dL LjGl]WN O O^ b p0 Tq o -9•t.• NV N Oi •� L 6�9•Vr [l N •`+ 6V0 uNp WVl°i �6 lJ�°Z 6r N �I � NT �I C r! PI QI O NI� I \•'IL � W V' 1 \ ml - VrN E S `l rCGi ° E•L'•` <F �V G y q C < G N • d I I c 9 C ✓ P I N _V L` G u. C C d V q O ° 9 `.. a i e c u F : x cu d° e •� tv I °comer cp = Tc "L GO v.. ' (: = 9 °d °g �6 `Gd .°� O LOVy ..O GP a tz O1H L'rn� r eL « o oo o �-�. Z o Gq V V _6 }q cj C•yNE E•. °^ N- L6 L dT GVV y= N 9 4 l r d L- '^ r o ` Lyq � or o - dam• v �. �` tv � d o L c ✓L ^u ° -N Cyr n r s. L.= i - ac o qo al c .�. a� � `V MFO O � > >,L a `rpte ` 1 - L c _.°• - G 9 O C 06 G •'•6 w�\ u roiCt•. V�rO Q- Ga•r P �-LC. ° uVW 0 d -di = C Z 7 y r- u_° ° •l G- C lu y y° q C C MEV l Tom- rNgry T -_ E ^ O °O•NO N 4r N.N•� ` V u u Eoo W L duz u isv c L PG TS G V- O yV .' °u = .G u 4VNl u O -C9 G f1 r C V O d O V 6r w Gc -_ Vo �+ P.L.• PEL �o Gp i °+r< - `- mL O^ (6O LG O WC••• W1L FE VG �9 N Y.°V ail Lm i 'L/M�'I��I �QVq I N«C OV Y G WES �L YrV Z.- L. I T R�WNO ti9q V HS ( _ • • • • • {1 V � O Q R N O a..t V O L d O 2 o `) rn Q% L 1r.1 c z O C ` O a d � 0 0 a nE a N C r O c o v - i C C O O v v o � 4 9 O .� .0. ' C+ L v 0 GOq� ✓ v T ✓ •N .0 4 ✓ V N O E r` C r L C N✓ i✓ P� 9 O �'O - C del Y V 9 �✓ O L -+ C ° P d v I � ✓ 6 L p E P o C V V P .V. _r ` .ra a o` W d 9.r Vl •r aW ` ✓ L w r ✓ �` `-•' n 9c. �.- � odj rim � k ° L L.'. � � U IVJP yLC >L G 6 V 04 G G O M VI�O� p p d O 2 i �VI c�Tw daL ao °w °cam `y r n `� a I r T� w° �✓ � d' V l i � - O d d i p�.9i�r OC�P GVO V9� � «iOPI 00 � «•n oi` � _ =i tO. P V �'� �9ro P JO _. ✓L qL __ iw x VCjLL n.Li. n✓ ` q E 9 r A` r G O` u i L i' w O O T S o°� ✓� uV o - ✓ Q a✓ d V nr V d r ✓(( O « = .r M = all 19 ` d oLS � ° d d n N ✓ E y J •-•e i Ow ° � dQ� _ .rr � L.:d��' TN � u 0 � L L ✓_ V `�L � � O l a •^ � ti G w ° Q .r.' y r ✓1t 1O'� C. 6 q ° ✓ 6 a ' 9 p° O. d 0 � N rO ✓ G � �� � ._. T �. -� ✓ 0 C V r T^ _C t a p j L ° L °'a°IQ= tP u I' a„ `.^ .w _ °-° r 9�r u- o. aM p`- ✓ Vf atas 4w ✓ 1x GT q O�9 0• °q C toil _ r_ia d C q r ✓✓ q O d a ° r O O _. L d. P r L p O� Pr ��� O V u✓ C d °� M C G+ w g ` a =V igsnr nova v f, CPV �w � 9 ✓ym 'T vLn r O1i� a Y aM • �N `o � - Y Yi.uE ai � � V G•o',• V9 44 K�pt.0 'V� -J SS GvQ9 EL 1N O 6 L n N •I �I E l \� I l 1 N�Nil `N _%4- O .� .0. ' C+ L v 0 GOq� ✓ v T ✓ •N .0 4 ✓ V N O E r` C r L C N✓ i✓ P� 9 O �'O - C del Y V 9 �✓ O L -+ C ° P d v I � ✓ 6 L p E P o C V V P .V. _r ` .ra a o` W •r ✓ L w r ✓ �` `-•' n 9c. �.- � odj rim � k ° L L.'. � � 99G1a IVJP yLC >L G 6 O�°. 04 VI�O� C d O T� i p�.9i�r OC�P GVO V9� � «iOPI 00 � =i tO. �'� N 4L 47.n �S ✓G _i ir'lq .LifOr VCjLL n.Li. n✓ ` O✓ E 9 r A` r G O` u i L i' w O O T S uV a � t ✓ ✓ Q a✓ d V nr V d r ✓(( O « = .r r ✓ c O dc.nr _ ory d oLS � ° d d n N ✓ E t. �' •-•e O o. O. C � dQ� L > .rr � L.:d��' TN u 0 N O nO E T° ° `�L � � O l a •^ � ti G w ° Q .r.' y r n C. 6 q ° ✓ 6 a ' 9 p° O. d 0 � N rO ✓ G � �� � ._. T � G a _C t a c ° L °'a°IQ= tP u I' a„ `.^ .w _ °-° r 9�r u- o. aM p`- ✓ Vf atas 4w ✓ 1x GT q O�9 0• °q C toil r_ia a 6 O O _. L d. P r L p O� Pr ��� O V u✓ C d °� M C G+ w g ` a =V igsnr nova v CPV �w � 9 a Y v • �I � C V� _%4- 1 I `J Ln 1 1 dx `I O V _y ^i O °c a' P c 9 F p> E E v r v V i= c E V u V •� d G Q� O ^c O „ J V w N J C as J W V V' e � � � O d• •V V N ^ N u J u r d p � PO Lr Cis D C C W T i C Q u °� ^ •`+ Ny d q r V C W r C u q T V 1 C O V V P O�nV wr � ^JT YN yC '°p_ W C N ° -G 4d` -�q N Sr 6V 6� Wr NLV VO � �p � e 26 r.�r N L °c a' P c 9 F p> E E v r v V i= c E V u O ^c O „ J V w N J C as J W V V' e � � � O d• PV u T \ r C (T 4`I � O� `nNOi C �rT l u6p�r rY`'W a�an dq � jz 6 r V 2 prc Pu_d G°y` O a q d�k6 �V L r � O p C O drL P N • � O^ q p T q V P Tr . y W d V d OL r> C. t r q_ r qV lr V t c c P N °d r rP`V d N P C O Oq0 OCVnd M E d J nC Cl CA P V 9 i u E d« W H nu e.°• 4 G w � n r- c t c `�'(r NOrr vr+p 1 t� �I 0� U O d C V r i q i .. n� vr.. p9 C G I n N PO G C o� -s c I �I IL �I T_ p d C � � O �t E � < L C G ° c oN C> dV M O �p V P ' P C � V� Or. C a rP� 9-a Cv V d � ~ T a 0 0 0o c q o'a �l V —7; C T -� O r O 6 U O � un9 L � w C o � A r o U C y P � U + V C N orq � E D O M a G D ,vovL w'Q O V I4 °• as �N9 c u ° v IP Q= G � o ° y � a+ ±�4 r O V O m a M c v` o � N V d PC P �W r � u V V mtf1 a I u 5 d a H u Y N u d > 4 � c � c vc � V A C PW 0 v u T C V 6 r dL 4 s as Nq Tv e � L V N G P C � o C � O 9 _ v d � 0 a O ~n d J L 9 .a, c s Y r .y + r . 'S 6 -J V_ P r L a L c =_ S ca uv C uu O N � uva =o � n Ma <� w L V u'q T V c a A ✓ Oy _ o Y r d N � U 9 � O O P e v G 9 u� ° N 4 r oc. v � o ` G O d u P c 0 c— .L+ q S + i C + P L G r O d o w v- vP c >O T n= dV ai c` F s 4 u _r > > n C d C O L r 0 p u V j a P r ` L q a P T G r � V -- C a9 <i T � q Nn 0 O V 0 +u - +v L + r ` d ` d C a o`. 00 � L a i d �A v` p�v oue d °c � N va O 9 Y q n E r u �o � Y cv V O V J^ � a Lpq �a E '^cr aoa V L f• � r• T r A A i w � 6r`O V � a 6C 6 + N c 7 v u O 0 L n E >I N 4 q v V c � � FII N P � � O =I W 6 4 `a`11 ul� d .L.r O a U C e o � `G u v v O ti o c V P � O d a � N O L G N O n .+ E u � r � u 6 < O NI n E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 11, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -11 - KLUMPP - A request to operate a children's gymnastic class tprivate school) in an existing industrial faciiity, lease space is approximately 2,000 sq. ft., on 1.9 acres in the General Industrial /Rail Served District (Subarea 5) located at 9634 Turner Avenue - APN 210 - 071 -43. I. PROJECT AND SIT` DESCRIPTION: A. Action Reauested: Approval of Conditional Use Permit. B. Purpose: Gymnastic Facility. C. Location: 9634 Turner Avenue. D. Parcel Size: N/A E. Existinq Zoninq: G =neral industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5) F. Existing Land Use: Multi- tenant, industrial. G. Surroundin Land Use and Zoning: ort - _nausF_Aa ; Ueneral Industrial/Rail Served (Subarea 51 South - Vacant; City Boundary East - Vacant; General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5) West - Vacant, Industrial; General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5) H. General Plan Designations: .roiect Site - Genera Industriai /Rail Served North - General Industrial /Rail Served South - City Boundary East - General Industrial /Rail Served West - General Industrial/Rail Served I. Site Characteristics: Gymnastic school facility will occupy t e interior units of an existing vacant industrial building within an industrial park. J. Appe Regulations: The General Industrial/Rail Served zolicabl ne a ows recreational facilities and sports that are performed indoors. ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84- 11/Klumpp Page 2 E II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The major issue is the compatibility of the proposed gymnastic school facility with the adjacent uses. Typical concerns are noise, traffic, parking, and hours of operation. The applicant has proposed to offer classes from 3:00 p.m. to 8 :30 p.m. on weekdays. Most of the students are dropped off and picked up by their parents. The proposed use must comply with the noise and vibration standards of the Industrial Specific Plan. Although the industrial park has a parking facility of 79 spaces, based on the existing uses and the proposed use, a total of 97 spaces are required. To mitigate the parking problem, the owner of the property has proposed to make up the balance of the parking requirements by adding parking spaces to the northwesterly side of the property line. Site plans will be submitted to the Planning Division for review. This type of activity is similar to dance schools which have successful operations in other industrial areas of Rancho Cucamonga. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial Area pecific Plan and the General Plan. The proposed ,use, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, will not be detrimental to the public health or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The L y Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To a•te, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider aff material and input regarding this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding and Conditions of Approval, adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. bmi tted, Planner RG:NF:os Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions p -z I CHA. LES F. XLUMPP SOUTHERN CJTLIFORNIA ACADEMY OF GYMNASTICS LIMITED 1143 N. HELL-MAN AVENUE ONTARIO, CA 91751 May 31, 1954 Citv of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Community Development To Whom It Mav Concern: This letter is being furnished in conjunction with an Application. for Conditional Use Permit. To accommodate needs as a private gymnastics school, we have located a building in your city which meets our needs and require- ments_ This facility has a clear floor span area of at least 44' x 44' to accommodate floor exercise routines, and a ground -to- ceiling clearance- of at least 141, for the other gymnastics equipment. Industrial buildings are the only type of structures suitable for our use. The activity at this facility will be to train boys and girls in the various Olympic gymnastic events, such as vaulting, uneven bars, balance beam, pommel horse, still rings and floor exercise. All activities will be confined to the inside of the prenises. Parents are required to escort students in and out of the building at the beginning and end of their class. We require one parent to be on duty at all times in the reception area to help supervise students arriving and departing. Approximately one -third of our students car -pool and thereby minimize the need for parking_ Since one of the rules at the Academy is that parents are not allowed in the training area, except for certain times during the year, the majority of our parents drop their youngsters off and return for them, at the end of their clasp_ We allow a 15- minute break between classes. Our regular class program consists of two instructors and fourteen students, or a ratio of seven students to one instructor. 1PIt is my understanding that the current parking requirements are one parking space for each instructor and one space for ever three students. Eased on the abovementioned parameters there would seem to be ample parking for our requirements. 4-3 r Page Ti;o City of Rancho Cucamonga May 31, 1984 r We are currently in a similar facility, but are seeking another location because the roof has never been completely repaired, we have a flooding problem, when it rains, there is no foil insulation, there is excessive office space which would be extremely expensive to remove, and we need more open gymn area. We feel that our use is compatible with other existing tenants in the park. These ten=ants include Richard Mills & Associates, American_ Invesco Inc., Pacific Marpac Inc., and Boehringer Mannheim. Richard Mills & Associates is a Civil Engineering firm. American Invesco Inc. is utilizing the building strictly for general office /administration, and dead storage of finished product. Pacific Marpac Inc. dr�cs Plastic injection molding; however, all of their activities are cctfinad to the rear portion of their building. Boehrirger Mannheim is distribution and service of medical supplies. Richard Mills & Associates and American_ Invesco Inc. are the only two tenants that would utilize the same ingress and egress as our facility. Our regular class hours are between 3:OOPM and 8:3OPM. Very truly yours, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF GYMNASTICS LIMITED is Charles F. Klumpp CFK /alr r- CITY OF RAI CHO CUCAINlo GA PL I"NNi \G GiViigQN WORTH TTLE ° --1.�� MAP EKEIM T u ,42� SCALE: tO Fvq i• �- RI'CHAI�D MI S AS'"OCl TE. ' 7;]500 � I'-- AV4 �r I v ' i � � ICA [J� SCO V A C A N 1!- 0 10, 00 � F. `p T o _ Z ~i LrTI ilillllll�! l�-11I 4-th CITE' OF ITEN I: —1 t RANCHO CUCA •IO \NGA PLLNri TTINTG >�avi� �i TTTU.: EXHIBM .a lL.14111) r C 11.00 r.)a 15,000 SO. FT. H7 l CF 90POSEDI — NAL PARK G SG:.E?ZINGER E j r_ .t _NVHEItd z ;I i5, 000 5Q.FT. 1— tO Fvq i• �- RI'CHAI�D MI S AS'"OCl TE. ' 7;]500 � I'-- AV4 �r I v ' i � � ICA [J� SCO V A C A N 1!- 0 10, 00 � F. `p T o _ Z ~i LrTI ilillllll�! l�-11I 4-th CITE' OF ITEN I: —1 t RANCHO CUCA •IO \NGA PLLNri TTINTG >�avi� �i TTTU.: EXHIBM .a 0 E CITY OF RAINCHO CUCAiMO \OA PLUNTINI \G DIVISION' G� NORTH ITEJ1- _ CUp -�I TITLE - 00 :5 EXHIBIT- I�SCALE- 7 t; ,,.:. '1 ® RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, 84 -11 FOR A GYMNASTIC SCHOOL FACILITY LOCATED AT 9634 TURNER AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL /RAIL SERVED DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 31st day of May, 1984, a complete appiication was filed by Charles F. Klumpp for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the lith day of Outy, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. ® 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -11 is approved subject to the fol owing conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. Site plan showing revised parking areas shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. 2. All exterior signs shall require Planning Division approval in accordance with the Sign Ordinance. 3. The operation of the use shall comply with the Class 8 performance standards of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, particularly noise and vibration. 4. The maximum number of students per class shall not exceed 14. 5. Floor plans of the buildings shall be submitted to the Fire District for review prior to occupancy. Resolution No. Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11th DAY OF JULY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST:— Rick Gom =_z, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City o, Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July, 1934, by the following rote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS- WA CJ r1 C E. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT "r DATE: July 11, 1984 0 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd S. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kral!, Engineering Technician SUEJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8597 - LOZIER CORP. - A division cf 37.15 acres within the General Industrial /Rail Served District (Subarea 2) into 2 parcels located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue between 9th Street and Arrow Route - APN 209- 102 -01 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map. B. ?urpose: To divide 37.75 acres into 2 parcels. C. Location: On the East side of Vineyard Avenue between 9th Street anU-Arrow Route. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 10.37 acres Parcel 2 27.38 acres Total i.TS acres E. Existing Zonin3 General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 2). F. Existing Land Use: Parcel 1 Existing Industrial Building Parcel 2 Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use: North - Vat ant South - Existing Industrial Building East - Existing Industrial Building West - Vacant. H. Surrounding General Plan and Development Ccde Designations: North - Medium 18 -14 du /ac) Res i dent ia Development District South, - General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 2) East - General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 2) West - General Industrial (Subarea 1) I. Site Characteristics: Parcel 1 of this site contains an industrial building whiie--Fa—r-ce-1 _ is vacant. The site slopes from north to south at approximately 2 %. I: ITEM H A Z PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Parcel Man 8597 July 11, 1984 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: Lazier Corp. has submitted this Parcel Map to divide 37.75 acres into 2 parcels to separate the development portion (Parcel 1) from the vacant portion. Development plans have not been submitted for the vacant parcel. Widening of Arrow Route along the frontage of Parcel 12 will be completed at the time of development of Parcel 2. The site drainage flows to the southeasterly corner of the site to Ninth Street. A plan of existing grading conditions is attached for your review. Grading plans will be further reviewed at the time of development of Parcel 2. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Aisr_ attached for your review and consideration Ts Part I oi the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. IF, after such consideration, the Commission can supuort the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. Respectfully submitted, LB *. :jaa Attachments: Map - Tentative & Vicinity Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study /b'---�L 11 A �j C r L LM CITY OF RANCHO CUCA;t ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP title; page is Nrd 7 /.Far PARCEL MAP N0. 8597 /IV TA1= C. ;rY G•= :'� Y7 CJC: : /vv"A rFrr/QL,J /v/ AW OCL075•!dn : ^/i TC'BC S"JV/I=LGr 10. CI-Ca- MOnLz v/NE•2R0 re4CT CS -Far., AE:..=..c: 9t :l r'.. !% /r'CS i fff<l Re C•.RJS Jr y:rvQ Rrv./PQ:vJ CY.V1 rr Sr-Lrc sG:LE /' %y -9 JFCt/L•FL 4iv.4 ' RM Ii I I a.K rcc ' c.En•uE u f I • � 1 Nwr. swerr n?iCAL atC?iOVS - 4- YrM`Y C' II•WY:S.- a•.`•wi'fF•: rArt (] < :r •. .r r<iO r<wJ•S ,rr .'C "rrp aesrr /.w.'K•W: N4 ]lR GS:RK] en_ <r I I _tcw.o M—IEVII. I 4I 2. ., aiffii 11 E 11 :.pGoJrr .•r.u•(r :«rSG CcioFCXr K•N ^'. s_. nNC to L %•."!E4• Maa rE9 P•a 5C t. CC•1' 4 / -n.•l O" =�< N_GR45 -4 co,or y "l�ep C_]a AP(r-0 Gr]L/ / <JC.' :Or..lJl•J .:.TLN _LtF S YV /R�5 RM Ii I I a.K rcc ' c.En•uE u f I • � 1 Nwr. swerr n?iCAL atC?iOVS - 4- YrM`Y C' II•WY:S.- a•.`•wi'fF•: rArt (] < :r •. .r r<iO r<wJ•S ,rr .'C "rrp aesrr /.w.'K•W: N4 ]lR GS:RK] en_ <r I I _tcw.o M—IEVII. I 4I 2. ., aiffii 11 E 11 44`1dR , I,.. C Cr •,,.A0.. .. .w III V Q. 4 n y ^ /: 1. 11I!C � Pa .9'c•C C4. •.. 1 6]ir Ir � _� .T[.'AL•V .LLfYG T•r:.✓wC:J _ • • � -4 Fir^ rB Ci5 /ufeM1 LF]R: :v qurE � av:] ^/w i ei •i:/•. �i�.Fprs RM Ii I I a.K rcc ' c.En•uE u f I • � 1 Nwr. swerr n?iCAL atC?iOVS - 4- YrM`Y C' II•WY:S.- a•.`•wi'fF•: rArt (] < :r •. .r r<iO r<wJ•S ,rr .'C "rrp aesrr /.w.'K•W: N4 ]lR GS:RK] en_ <r I I _tcw.o M—IEVII. I 4I 2. ., aiffii 11 E 11 CITY OF a.ANCHO CUCAMC 7GA INITIAL STUDY PAR= I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: 587.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initia_ Study. The Development Review Co=mittee will meet a:_- take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report_ should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. IF PROJECT TIT1E: Parcel Map No. 8597 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Lozier Corporation P. O. Box 188, Omaha, Nebraska 68101 (4C7)541-5000 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Georce E. Mim Mack 214 Scuth Euclid Avenue, Ontario, Ca itorn!` io t 1 MM-U437 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.2 8901 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, California LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGr:NCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS- 1-1 H-s i PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Division of one -parcel into two -parcels- -one with existing industrial building and one vacant parcel. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA A*ID.SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING P.ND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 37.7 acres and 158,400 s.f. of industrial building DESCRIBE THE ENVIRC8NiV1ENT_`zi, SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS,: AMY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL. OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SJRROUNDING'PROPERTIES, A14D THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSAIY SHEETS): This site in on a and contains one vacant but was us, plantings or_ the The site supports no significant cu . on the north by a vacant d for nanufactur wilding site the cnly insects, bi tural, historica citrus grove an3 dings; on the so lard; and on the proximately 28) alluvial cone of 168,400 s.f, which is now g elevators. Except for ornament are no plants except native Bras s and ground squirrels. The site or scenic aspects. The site is b acant industrial land ; on the ea west by a Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, *.may as a whole have significant environmental impact? This project consists of 37+ acres of industrial land, 10+ acres of which has been developed for many years and the entire site has been anticipated as developing in industrial_ The infrastructure has been Planned and/or built to support such development, therefore, there is no significant environmental impact. 1-2 7SI-6 i 0 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X_ 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ X_ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration.? 3. Create a substantial chance in demand for municipal services (noli_ce, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 7 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? _ x D. Remove any existing trees? How many? x 5. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: I.MPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation - to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be repaired to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Cor=ttee. Date '�`�"� Signature Title RCE 9399 1-3 v- 7 f f RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 1p The fcllowing,inforTation shnuld be provided to the City of Rancho Planr_ing Division in order to aid ir. assessing the ability of the district to accc- =Modate the Cucamonga proposed residential development. school Nr of Developer and Tentative Tract NO.: Specific Location of Project: ?BASE I !E 2 PHASE 3 PHAS." 4 1. N.•sber of single TOTA;. ia7.ily units: 2 Number of multiple family .=its: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of Occupancy: Model S i and tr of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Rase I -4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8597 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8597), LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVENUE BETWEEN NINTH STREET AND ARROW ROUTE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8597, submitted by Lozier Corp. and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue between Ninth Street and Arrow Route being a division. of Lots 11 and 12 Subdivision of Lot 10, Cucamonga Vineyard Tract as per Map recorded in Book 20 of Maps, Page 44, Records of San Bernardino County, State of Californ " -; and WHEREAS, on June 5, 1984, a formal application was submitted reqjesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on July 11, 1984, :le Planning Co missior. held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - ascribed map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: ® SECTION 1: That the following findings have 'aeen made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 11 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on July 11, 1984. 4 SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Man No. 8597 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman — ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of th2 „ Planning C ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and reguiarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning CN mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coimnllssion held on the 11th day of July, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMQdISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: id Ll Ll E E. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF .'dPPROVAL LOCATION: East side of Vineyard Avenue TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO: 8597 between Ninth Street and Arrow Route DATE FILED: June 5, 1984 LEGAL DESCRI?TION: Geina a division of NUMBER OF LOTS: Lots 11 and 12 Subdivision of Lot 10, GROSS ACREAGE 37.75 Cuc=on'a Vineyard Tract as per Mao recorded r 'O: 209- 1C2 -0' ASSESSOR PARCEL !. ,, in Book 20 of Maps, Page 44, Records of San Bernardino County, State of California DEVELOPER 11;t ENGINEEP /SURVEYOR Lozier Corn. same George MimMack P. 0. Box 188 Omaha, Nebraska 68101 214 S. Euclid Avenue Ontario, CA 91761 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the mini'cipai Cade of the City of Rsncho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. x 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: 6 additional feet on Arrow Route additional feet on additional feet on X 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards: 24 foot property line radius on Arrow and Vineyard and Ninth and Vineyard. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. -1- f // X 6. All existing easlements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaime4 nr delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. X _ 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to building permit issuance. 2. A lien agreement mast be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit for Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Titie 16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with is the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to building permit issuance for Parcel 2, see Condition 012 on Page 5. Curb & Street Name .Gutter A.C. Pvmt. Side- Il Drive Walk IAo r. +Street Street A.C. Trees Lights 0verla Mediar Island* Other, Arrow Rte7 x X X i X I X I X Ninth St ; X i X X X -Vineyard Av I x I X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter -2- 54/-/0 X 4. Prior to any work F_ing performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition, to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. E Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff -3- — 43 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lines of laV or less fronting the property shall be underground ^d. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X Street light locations, as required, arp co be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X. 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewaiks. _ Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. E Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff -3- — 43 Grading X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code. City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer lirensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the mar. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructor. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County 'dater District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from Cal Trans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. -4. 11 X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. S. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. Drive approach on Parcel 2 shall be constructed opposite Bear Gulch Place which is under construction on the north side of Arrow Route. X 12. At the time of development of Parcel 2, the existing curb and gutter on Arrow Route shall be removed and reconstructed at ultimate width. X 13. Traffic interconnect conduit shall be installed on Vineyard at time of sidewalk construction for Parcel 2. -5- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMMA LLOYD U.. NOBS, CITY ENGINEER by: /j' L 11 r: .a CIT Y OF RANCHO CUCA1MONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 11, 1984 1971 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: John Martin, Assistant C; ­fl Engineer SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 12490 LOT CHANGE - AMERICAN NATIONAL - The revision from 2 to lots for phasing and financing purposes of a division of 6.0 acres in the R -3 zc,ne located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard - APN 208- 241 -11 The Tract Engineer on behalf of the Developer has requested that the subject tract be revised. This project wat previously approved as a two -lot development. Financing constraints and construction phasing needs have prompted the request to chal.;e the number of lots from two to five for Tentative Tract 12490. This change will have no adverse affects on the orderly development of the site. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve revised Tentative Tract 12490. Respectfully submi jaa Attachments ITEM I >7e.el.ofi4- odNte � ' Du C'RICAL A!A'lipJAL C.- :,f.OUV TEN xvCaLY N,Lif CqV F, 102:2 . 1-111c �JJOT,K+ON N. 11[, 6nf Ia yyap.,.kaj p.. b/ -)CL. ilfj /[{'I,_�0O IC ACYC..MON�.•1NtY ►4- J'It4G1.,N 4.1.'f G,Of ,G. ; ¢. � Y,G OONLG,TY O✓ ,•yr,G NO G4Ca,ab:aN.90 MNnbW WIW CL <OSOaO K ' CGL�I TT -f at.¢aL¢OI STA a .uf i.;� �_ • ' 'aeac Gslvo•nlN•YW PURN�SEL UN115•)ZO (-off k'NO)2 . N1.1taGfWat. _ GoNTA,N•NO 41 AC40a'Ofy, (,p Aea.a•il n dG.MOaJ. GvJNTY LLlac o�if. N M OGT. 11. I d ^., -NO GJp.MiONby. C,yL. V tl &l 1 •dDV.HIGa.1 1412¢ / 1.*•�i ) ) r �s.2' ,�" w C1Tf,<s ,. ,�,c) fO(We" _ aK,4T. c'N.M � I, 1 faR K 9Mif17W OA. - �� I .ge - el r a-" . LL./ra 7 z ; tv.of 1 O 3•ruMY a of �•IYriuL) a -K � �� - �cwrN •c,esr •r fu!'Ot� j � I J G _:(1 5 1- , �.:' V •�A .�. A N ' ?% . FF' k, 125 40 v.N411{ A- 14 � Q `•� �� r ; pa.P,..a� �T. ' e <- �a,v,L CMT N.lJC1,b- VI.J..NtNO e,wn.co� � n.�s.gavwi ew v. -N •vt. vtL.. �. ~ L`Mr -. � Z �'� �� / � T' � � a:u[t9.•r. a�a PR LNe3. ; fl _ r D I C I twGG'Ml. bR ObL NNC ryt1,r+G6 f ln�sr. fs,c.y.::. I u ul � •� j as•.+1�• r- � s.r. - s i toai 4Ntulu u...�. �. r W.1�.ufb eJLi l..le L,u•�.f. _ 1 Y aNS1.4JTaat •= ��'iu"s� I .., • /• aacT. 4&. 00tict 12 f .w•.sa..rua�i. +L Z' I I L..�.J V 1 H E -(A S'A V��e • 1 Q�'• rax,+T rt 4i+laa rw.t 0 Z, ...1� . =.• �¢w1. e•nc 04. f� A J ' y ..� t L mn •St.IK XT cuGaMOr10A GOU•TTT I_ �, coy ..n G at G , A L - Ij Na.T eac v,ft. l¢ MI y Miv. oE,J. 4/IG gi V i; I. 1 acaLC 1•./.p' Jar== , .egeg,: NCa� /—C� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12490 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12490, hereinafter "Map" submitted by American National, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing :he real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a condominium development on 6.0 acres being 2 lots, located on the east side of Vineyard Avenve, south of Foothill Boulevard, was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission 1anuary 25, 1984; and WHEREAS, a revision to said map creating 5 lots has re;ularly come before the Planning Commission on July 11, 1984; and WHEREAS, the Planning Co-.lmission has read and considered the Engineering Division's report. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: `ECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tract No. 12490 and the Map thereof: (9) That the map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code and specific plans; (bl The improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the proposed development; (d) The proposed subdivision and improvements not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12490, a copy of which is attached Ferto— is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions: (a) Conditions of Approval contained in Resolution NO. 84 -10 shall apply to this map. �--)-1�? APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS I TH DAY Or' JJ1 1984. 0 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Comez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July, IS-84, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �y A 11 E E.I. RESOLUTIO ?l NO. 34 -10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDIT.T_Oi;ALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12490 WHEREAS, Tentative -..*act Map No. 12490, hereinafter "Map" submitted by American National Corporation, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State, of California, described as a residential subdivision for ccndomini :imij purposes of 6.1 acres of land *located on the east side of Vineyard, south of Foothill into 2 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action or, January 25, 1964; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Flap sucjc�t to ail conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered Other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga �'oes resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to ientative Tract No. 12490 and the MaD thereo`: (a) The tentative tract is consistent witn tie General Plan and specific plans; (�) ine design or improves =nts of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (�) 71°- design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damaae and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or Their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentat'vs tract will not ccnfiict with any easement acpuire.i by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract ?rap Plo. 12490 a copy of ahich is attached hereto, is hereby aDaroved sub ' Pct t_ to all r and the attached Standard Conditions: o' `he foiioring conditions Plannino Division i. Additional architectural treatment shall be provided on the end of each building such as, a hip roof, false windows, and /or horizontal siding. Also, window pop -cuts on corner windows and /or selective use of planter bowindows sflall be provided on the upper scary front eleva subm tions. Revised elevations shall be itted for review and approval by the uesign Review prior to issuance buiiding permits. 2. Permanent easement fcr secondary (emereency) access from adjacent proper�Lv owner shall be required prior to recordation. Said access shall be provided in accordance with Foothill Fire Protection District standards. 3. Dweliinc units shall have a minimum 150 square foot private open space. 4. Project shall provide recreation area /facility and energy conservation features as required by the Develcpment Code. Details Shall be included in construction, plans and approve=d by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. S- The tot lot shall be relocated adjacent to the swimming pool. 6. Details of the carports, recreation building, tot lot, and laundry building shall be included in the construction plans ary approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 1. Perimeter fence on the souther'„% tract boundary shall not exceed eight (8) feet, as measured on the south side. Any fencing above eight (E) feet in heicht shall be constructed of wrought iron or tubular steel that is non -view obstructing. EnaineerinC Division• 1. Vineyard Avenue pavement shall :�e reconstructed to conform to existing City standards for a secondary highway on both sides of certer;ine. The struct rUl section shall be determined by a soils report prior to final aparova� fo the improve-ment plans. The west side of Vineyard shall be widened as necessary to accommodate four lanes of traffic :cith : left -turn lane. 2. A drainage pipe may be required to be -,stalled in Vineyard tic accommodate flows from. site to daylight downstream with ar outlet structure to the satisfaction cf the City Engineer. 6 J L] 11 3. The applicant shall be i ;wired to acquire a privar_e dr�iraae easement through the ar'i0ining property to the east rior- ", issuance of any permit for development. APPROVED AND ADOPTED EMS 25th DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLA NNI-7, V MMISSI0l OF Tiff- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAr4ONGA BY: Uennis LJ /Stout, �Ya�rman ATTEST: ; ' % /)/f-- -- - Pick,Gomer, Deputy Secretary I, Rick.Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planninq Commission of the City of Rancho Cbcamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamor-ga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January, 1934, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: C0?19ISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS REMPEL, MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ, STOUT NONE NONE t !!;v I `I i.1 L i d i v O O O O Z5 v C `o = C L O 1L_ � V 7 N < O V G V a O < J O_ d`IO L GO S OG✓Mt N ^a ° P— OP nG bG 7o r \C L q C r L G y � G P Y y V Y V 4<`.r= � u- °a q0 EON 'J Q�b �c 4 Gpr V r�7 o$ _ �' V O Ors _C� pdG_ o �N N06 __• d� L •.r r ^Oy •a.. 2 u NG 9e-C C r �e C Jrr n Nk E 7 C � L =� >— 9 U O E ^ G L O «^ •,• �• 6 x L C Gq b 6« L � •^ W 21 S � N d C O V u� � e G t > _ d ^ L •f V O p G � O l _ a° r Y �I UC_% �qG dG6J �j Y q0 VV Lr _z C r N O� n0 6. Y V NOr GOCG MG✓N OqV q�°r �^JNV r Or qLY G•^ V` o•_+V uc0 y V j OE7 O9 `r �P 9� S a •a_GO 9� •fit_ G ` z V °W ua ^ °u. 6r.0 > .OS N^ o —N L O. •.r ^ l V —LNN q V O-2 L O • P_ G v ycc _ 9 '..TO CG Oe.^ J_9.Y NO �O qNi� CN qrq O• .r O qI N� _ a 6 q_ p P G N e ° e r r O N O °� r — V O NFL = v •d• O_ i _. O� S O M1 C r G-AG� pN Oy ACV r3J GVjO LPC� Y•O.• fy Vet �� >P� • Gp — O rc qJ'O y `o�� `ow rr °v Gu G YL va v.+ Lz c C �-•_ r`d c°,� N A u G Y � � V d V= m O. � b G. � q G 9 CO � G 'J. P 7 V G E •_ •Vi � N 7 G r > V' V C G Y= q C G V a} Y E Y O N` ° ^J L G r O r L W V 9 r G V• N q •" — p c V _V_ l E� G l G >. `5:E r. - 1 6 O V 6 O --Q O-Va GnGL4 6JGV 6NO.L QgtO 61) �6.°w � «6 Y-L NO O v O O O O Z5 v C `o = C L O 1L_ � V 7 N < O V G V a O < J O_ d`IO L GO S nG a q L q C r L G y � G P Y y V Y V 7z � NO r 6 q0 EON 'J Q�b �c 4 Gpr o$ �' V O _ N 6 C�� •a.. E r O E IL u W N O •,• 6« L � •^ S N d C O V u� � G t V E V V O p G � C i •F. Y Y �I _z C V p 2:5 ^� 9� •fit_ ` z ua c G v ycc _ V � V S O O• .r O V N k N� _ a 6 q_ p >P� • Gp O . r y G C NN Z6J G Y � � VEVE V6Y >V-6 YG �e O �O 6V� r �u - 1 O 11 0 I] N q C >.y d � P.. V L f.. ✓ enr_ G L l N O P C C N J L J n G+ O O y � u r V T T y •j O V 6 P^J q ' � C ✓ f 4 V� c r T � o i L D� � _ .1i. V C oc ivcG E O'.i , GAL V^�NE^ ✓- G3 =pCCV =mac yVO �r Y 6 � G � E V✓ ��� i N � U O '^L �p i O PL V im+ Oi� ✓`' G 9 E �� ✓ O`yE'V +E >d ^ .._cC ✓_ _ r0_ CV _ ✓ T .6��q .�� ^ 6�i_ �...9 •IiCSCO pi r•'Ji q� Cr V Q EV c�oc�� c i B ' 4 -•. ✓yr>i V iJ V �LJ C• 6V� 7 .r ..D OD_•V p C N C L p > ' C Y V >r O i o G i N L�L rr�O�Vr � ✓ yV. ��✓ `OiG� 4 C L qy Vt b P .�� VO �ri ma CVO ✓CV �iC uCG SOMA yDN?V�r O� VEMDCS6 O � ✓r �V�'w •Ga 'G9 EY7�rr c i VC ? `C�_S VL ^�_V— ^OrLV w- C O � CCQD O`C 4D �Or T�J ✓NO ` .'f ✓�� T 4 G Z d c q C C cG C ' 4'' Eo =d °JE ��e FO✓�L.` —°iy_ nOEC �a0 q <��_ GAUD ✓S V Vl�rO _qry ✓ r"r0 pC O ' � ` �wnw N C .o q s+ � Eo✓�rL O. _ _^. T p V q ✓ r °G ro e �N— <o pCO ��.V..YU.. J�6GP.ry F• V ✓9 ip +`NV G� du Cam' Crc G�ErJ VOA u 6OrD ✓�S 1NV� �G DE +00� yrr �rO�d q L6C VP =T nC qC0 Cp 6 -J qP C'� °�_ =c'c4� coG'� — °r qc ✓ju via o�COa ro clo o.L y.G NODE CJ N C n 0 p = C Vj `q C q 0 �` rl p✓ r� J 0� 4 Vr e r S l O d q V C C d `._.r � N u ✓ D NO -Jq 6J��OL 4 N �"�N � \ C O n V C6 ✓� b� y I �L �� O Q G q`V�Ne 0_ C � N L_ O 9 C V J CEO IF C O d� V✓ u _ O c C ✓ r r �O L .5 m V c .0. r .V.r �-2 2 .e �. • c wM��r�p C N 4 C z O. > ^ U O l GC tE �L 6�•3.>rr9NL ✓� O.�VaGC ;E�wV y ✓6 6 a p 2w�+3.� 6CN a N' •`� mI `� o� V ® p any. c— + s< -3.o - rdcLw s d s drew os j>,4 ✓� . O �. u V� 4 ✓ d V r C ^ i r O � V q d 66 N�> p` D i +G C 7 E Z � SV JU= Opp 6 L✓ d w V .EN q V L P6 L v O O _ _f {L ✓ r r£ V i u O ✓ 3 L cCGN V D. .n V D J q ESE Tt G -•c oinq -CSC •� � w V V 4 vim. °— G °� d a✓' �_ � ✓ -w v� +� — =•„ a — J L _N•+r_dN ,�� q + � b �= O ^� V CL j J V ✓ V POL Or c_ oc c o •rr.+�d c Y cE_ �p °GV•d .: q G .e_D n ✓ �a = z?- o^ — _a � N + coc'N r N w C_ V f� O C- O L y y ✓ V Y L q � �I 9 J D L V >� C C C -fir C C '•• V � -L O O_ V � � L >� r• C O j � O y C �� �� ✓ 9� c g O 0 NC ¢- V G O V r s= w OEi.0 G V T L p E O O r n 'TIT C C_ d p ✓ F C oC TuC �� C' Var C^J' =6�C Cr .s ^C� NJ y O> PGCC N q ✓ iy C r O C_ C C 9 P C O =` C✓ V j C g C d n d C 1' G V L _ V _ V >.� V q 4 L G 6 V -ci 9 C p •u V q? w < G__ -• C O = V L 0 6 P C �' -• r G V C T q_ L V O✓ L O J N C Q Pi. J N __✓ N J G C`> V N PO •� =i d0 r r c�!r rCN ON > v +M .Y c 75? `c c o TC `� c + co +-• >✓ �_ a ao r =.d V V O'rCC TG �qC�`> r^JV >9 LPG 6'N` r� _✓ St Op; e 0 4 J V Y V q > n✓ 0 1 N V G7 4 M O O 3• c O ' O P OVd uS 6N•fV 4_u D_V V..rV ✓� �r ` �L Vvf wp i--ND N1 (V 'J'pV 1r O•� ��j NCT «.�..r <V a N� � 6� Vr.rrq C� N_ N O q S• i 1 9 N i I � s QI,•LC.v _ � N G y •, - ` • � u �. Or_ � GaOi° .� T _ �^-i •n VL' u`C C= r S C ?'� �= V O Vj d.-• ^ � Y r �•u°- y=' _ •-n no"T .' i — ° °' N� ° .•' _° as _ P N �' O wV � V`=L.i J =a >- Cow C >N7 � _•: Lid,..°• ^� r �,. .. d >- Gr L� Er P y N a p ° 1 O O ff- �- � . O• O -� N O r9�rr V r Pa gyp qC T�•N ��OV � T O� C P •`.• r 9 C ;ZdT VLr TV GE` di 7,njC C< ='C �=` gC `- -L� - O C V O L U d v C v 6 u n V G 9 s C O N C- 6T -oo. 6V �°° C.na r.G..°. e� -.' dnu G -.. may- v i �i ti M 90 c - e.nc oa q'° cc.9 PL c ° -+ - - • -.ce°� i � � roc O � O L O n= b c` •V• b O V t N n^ O � f U r V U r M �L ie L L G -O G•' <br yGr O d =9tt�y 47, � V N V PG` <9y —if E° V _m 4wgV V nF0 -'c °r a y> e G ey -^boy L•a y 2 C Q =_ r t P n° 9 C c P U > g N O V O y.L'•< N 9d C-V ✓° Ld-�M �ayN 1, °•'CQ iyN u __Cd °n �^ y y� ..,.'o yam, iO a`.,"'d _ .. yo d ���_ yo L ., o __i Z' x - .°i. t,. �4 a o Vi - a o =�� L N oi. -g• ° •.� °r o N a'a nG` 9 V Y y Cr- C N _ �� nP.O• ^Op .', u ° G ~ 6 <° �.O -n C•' <wGe !_ Lr c�qr E^' er CLLL r C q G -- VC' �• r3NWC Ci•�d V _ GN �� O _ l CL °qu vc. r� s ° •o u za a�0 iN m- aG, dpi ,Z `rLGU CC_- O a D V ^- P -W iVp (•i C• P S d p V= _ ci °q q`o L � �u - °°.� _= �° ° _ •°. ^` u X70 rr - � �r OO. m•O F D3 `O C'q rLO ~ � _ GC VJ•, -�� � E q ov J 4 � C' •i _r•du E� r r U d'�- O'•- E v O V. V . r G-r c L V_ 0 0_ °J q• r E Vv f.' pr C•. O =r � � cY �� �` vr.t -nu0 co J� -O W -DC O d C O�P�•Gd °� °- r G V G L G � r t � - C V 6 G= ° •• j l OVA r J _r -^ = n -_ `i V,e � -qj ' �lLr ..0 ` V L` _d •O•G✓ •• n •C• O� 7 .. 9 - _� n_ r J V V P V_ D r r V w V 4 d y G n •Ln d d � N Y V r u G V n O y � O •^ • r- r- r �'- _ N GV 10 J �` O J V O G q G V G •Vr •J N • L C O O V V P C i .n O n` T q NII V d N d ._ V J j O° N w V C P` q y W O••O+ N .09 pqE= P V Vb C. 4 _ 6 GLW•n VI 6 -��° N 6V•:l Wti9 WVV �p UO p2 <r CPV 6VV0 N r{ •I ' { c� ® ' Y L•J C L�•w ;' j r d 6 C •O I �r NN V - { 6 V V� C` O�'- n `. O 1 op 6tj •iy O C Co c =VV � _ _ y � 1 4rJ yE qc o• c _ _ ° - =E i d OE �. cep y,' V •qo O r I c O '."w C i = r O` r r a• j O 1 _ rS0 O __ >r N `••rte i 6 •• 6 p _ _ t d° 0 n . C C C C q d C Or •" � V V 1. T. p v X00 Od �� _ q _ C W PN O L t CG•+CO _ CVO C O' C_ cF0 '•' n•. Ca. Gp N C - OC LO _ 60 V4'• r rl PL PEW a.dC- VG � `•�G�` 9 yq 63 O C� •- ->.C= � I V � GG C v CI W O r< i I •°•fit C` I = C� -i II 1 n aC•. E S V r V •4_G q C:•r 6 `� - C: ^V=� • 9 �! I V �� q N U d A '� •V'• £ GO: 2 N — I � 1 N 4 N O —6 v � Ji I u V L u E P 9 r Q �` q u' � '• V NF•-I a —O N 99 d6 ai aqc..° e� r .¢ i \I --mot N _ v `I C�..0 0 d= d U `✓ .Li. O L r > _,�o r_ O uV •O OLEO OnyO L. S.a 'L 47 Vr jW � ~J ' I d 1 -• R_c .•y "� L_ o v dr ca y N 6 r y9 G S{ >OP pC i �6 =w VO �E CTC U= �i ury V6N tl OS ._ Vf �I I I i V �. u L O C u v e � r d_ •^ O I� I `` uu�'C N9 qn d uN N(JLL(D NA ,• .1� I• ,�, �. o � �' M v x 9VL�V �c.Ti 9a c i �2 O _ OT i ray Lo I c^iyyE oc n« YQ� c!N � �»-4_• E? �✓ » I -v cvvti.°i. Em cEl WS VV NY 6L V_• o _ s �`•J a�� yOr _u V�d 9CGC V �•TG lCN P VE •°•CR Lu°?'O c 11 W N 6` L R O 1 4 9 N 7Z PV_tl rnL •� T� O ^P9�n° li 1 T w V 9 C Coq` G V r � _ l d_ t� G d 0 u O r Q E O a I y '• u � I L r y d C E • a G� 6 L G.L.. ^ v •-n � V d W y V V�V•'• 9Vr «Vrv� VA b2�NG� ^G P i R y` so o00 o i � <v yo' boo «uoa•c o.—a _Loo —c E q b ` .°•" c O •^ 4� c O.` y L C T i r� y r `G r y` o L •. E o.0 0� _ E O t O V O C C G O c G � r _ _ c_u_ rOr T uT dMCEJ�.�j y.0 � 7`� •CU� •—`Je j a •! 6 O. � O 7 =� C �� G l 4 V r C F 9 E oltp O G G u �..0 P u r j 6 N= N •. � L V N= .Nn; j u j 9I t ° 9 u• = O' M 4�' y � G j_ P c � d _�.. y I � . 1It G OP> .V•u� S �j Ce6 1]C.CL `•_G �� nG OC ( �V r O T�VV b. .Vito JRr °• .� °r_�9P 9 •_�; �j d rn n O.VTJ> •�Ow ^•>fP �. - -w N�6r C j L. �� �= 9b nu q vfvCan 6a o OC -E ^� IrcaOla <O�u9 cnq p{ O'i yT V= I �� �� ` NI• eI _p t y� GO E` �I of el — „; WI CI I I I C C O C O P v q Q G e N 0 d V c L'I m 11 > c R aJ L D ENL r Cw •'� CC V „ .J •O q V. Yom• V` a r l q I N 7 V �= yCy dl 'G O.il l a� � � o OI °.^a D I I � V .-• �C i E yc = T drq c^ to rz �C jN °q q' I {�{���d.�j Llei •e .•J Pi' O +"- Cc dl NL ® - O VCV N� NTWV t Cad b b ZF •j t � O- U r .• O J = D � O u r N n G` Cy�Gr I^J OGd ya rr C Nye o.a�y� � q O C L p M >• °V N y . T G y 14 _ i OGE rq Na t_�M E G9CN i Y L - rM q_L- d °i "' �?� °`..o .°., ~°e <�-°• —N >.<� T APO �� q^3 �E 3� � °W V dU0�9 My ru qC r .DwrC Eq .it q �.CV .• nCS VAN ML rC`L ` .-. 6r /� r_ 7_V VP� _ 6 �.a U' U CO.... C N C r V I OLO �> C_ ^SNC CU Rl °CC�DV QgUO D .e �r 0.= r PGC NUV C_ O �� T OE f. CVV PO vSELO Gin CJ rLCS L �S� `r VC` �co °d to °QU I.Jn O' Q D w � •Ti v S .Ti C Q L U 9 �. W V� N 6 .w ^ .°. C U M q V Q•' L ObG+ 9 VC qrb V V ^ -J P O T O V qi. `C+ C � r -4, G .w V L NMV q C R L q Oro Grrv• <U G- WrNVzy Sp`y1Q � I 1 �j 0 Z u U G O L d I c T o = ^� V L n `dc L = q�E 0 O� O d � r�1= r G q V T q O O H = 1 V V —Cd q P t •Cl6 G q r T O V 1 � 4 • a =� G q L J 40.r p �y l 11 n r u c c .• v — e j ° = q _ C d y.0 ��cc v �• C. 9GT 6t J 2•T q° — r GN •'] C V v V qI ~ L Y L C •• o ~� E a 4 V l _f O +• 6 .nI � j y? r r q a V •v— V `� VI — V ` G r' ll ul 1 pp Cam' 6 I c T o = ^� V L n `dc L = q�E 0 O� O d � r�1= r G q V T q O O H = 1 V V —Cd q P t •Cl6 G q r T O V 1 � 4 • a =� G q L J 40.r p �y l 11 n 7: El CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 11, 1984 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner 197-1 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -15 - REITER - the development of two 4U,UUU sq. ft. office /warehcuse structures on 18 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 16) generally located west of Archibald Avenue, south of 6th Street - APN 210- 062-31. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of a precise site plan and building elevations. B. Purpose: To create two (2) 40,000 sq. ft. office /warehouse buildings. C. Location: West of Archibald Avenue, south of 6th Street. D. Parcel Size: 18 acres (5.3 for the above proposal). E. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 16). F. Existing Land Use: Vacant parcel. G. Surroundin Land Use and Zonin Sitee - Industrial Park (Subarea 16). North - Industrial Park (Subarea ort - ac ant parcel, zone 7Tndustrial Park (Subarea 16). South - Vacant parcel, zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 16). East - Vacant parcel, zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 16). West - Vacant parcel, zuned Industrial Park (Subarea 16). H. Specific Plan Designations: Project Sitee - Industrial Park (Subarea 16). North - Industrial Park (Subarea 16). South - industrial Park (Subarea 16). East - Industrial Park (Subarea 16). West - Industrial Park (Subarea 16). ITEM J DR 84 -15 - Reiter July 11, 1984 Page 2 11 I. Site Characteristics: As i "A" , the site is situated is primarily undeveloped. indigenous plant materials located on the site. H. ANALYSIS: llustrated on the site plan (Exhibit ir. the center of Subarea 16, which The site contain: a variety of with no structures Or improvements A. General: As illustrated on the site plan (Exhibit "A"), the applicant is proposing the development of twm; office /warehouse structures composed of various precast concrete tilt -up panels. The complex will accommodate approximately 84,400 sq. ft, of floor area with parking designed to accommodate 201 parking stalls. Access to the project will be provided via a local street which will extend west from Archibald Avenue. B. Design Review Committee- The Design Review Committee was primarily concerned with the architecture of the proposed office /warehouse complex and recommended that the architecture be enhanced by providing glass window bands contiguous to Building 1 south and west elevations; and Building 2 east and south elevations. The Design Review Committee stated that the proposed structures should be designed compatible with the inte,mt of the Industrial Park Land Use category. The Committee was also concerned with building texture and recommended that ribbed or fluted concrete texture be provided between window segments and at the entrance area fin walls. The Design Review Committee also recommended that the concrete panels be sandblasted to provide additional texture. In addition, the Design Review Committee recommended that the concrete screen wall which spans Buildings 1 and 2 be composed of fluted or ribbed concrete. Lastly, the Design Review Committee recommended that a master plan be provided for the entire 18 acres of the site, to assure that the future lots can be developed compatible with the requirements of the Land Use category C. Development Review Commmittee: The Development Review Committee was primarily concerned with landscaping and stated that 15% of the site is to be 'mandscaped per Industrial Specific Plan standards. In addition, the Committee recommended that a 10- foot landscaped strip be provided around the perimeter of the building. The Development Review Committee also recommended that a minir..mm distance of 62 feet be provided for two -way double loaded aisles. Lastly, the Development Review Committee recommended *'ie inclusion of a local street knuckle to be provided along the local north /south street adjacent to the northwest corner of the parcel. Q- oZ u PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84 -15 - Reiter July 11, 1934 Page 3 D. Grading _Committee: The conceptual grading plan rnas Leen approved by the Grading Committee subject to approval of a final grading plan and the Conditions of Approval provided on the attached Resolution. Environmental Assessment: Part I cf the completed by the applicant. Staff comp Checklist and found no significant impacts related to the construction of Commission concurs with these findings, Declaration would be appropriate. Initial Study has been leted the Environmental adverse environmental the project. if the issuance of a Negative III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed in the attached Resolution were supported by the following facts: The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the development and the proposed uses are in accordance with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance. e The proposed building design and site plan, in con 'unction with the conditions of approval, are consistent with the current development standards of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for environmental review in The Daily Report newspaper. In addition, property owners within 500 feet of tha Proposed development have been notified per Industrial Specific Plan, requirements. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution, with Conditions of Approval, and issue a Negative Declaration. Res /ectfo/y Submitted, anner RG:FD:ns Attachments: Exhibit Fxhibit exhibit Exhibit Initial Resolut "A" - Site Plan "S" - Elevations "C" - Grading Plan "D" - Master Plan Area Study, Part I ion of Approvai with Conditions 6 3 4 ills- +:1 O J J © r Ell _- i=xiJ -��_ .Q NOR—Pi ;'- y ' • 11 t 0. TY OF NNCTD CUCA.,N,10-NGA PUMN:4iNG DIVGO-N NORTH EXHIR-r- SCAI E ;--s- L 11 t 0. TY OF NNCTD CUCA.,N,10-NGA PUMN:4iNG DIVGO-N NORTH EXHIR-r- SCAI E ;--s- 14, 1 . 4-t CITY OF RANC11-10 CUC� ,Njo NGA PLAININING DIN" D.N Tr! u: EXHIBUTT -a f SCALE MINN.., 11 El r. IK QZ �' 11 — T rZ� •OL.� wc�.Md ICV. !.Q ^ r r.•..p �.. H.rc wKe p.as�a pew: <a) ( � f L °-^ c ,. �" "`� _ i z uao wmi ur`...r _ r�� �y.00.•. •_ — _ __ �+'u) \ I wrmrmrwr. .�.� MOM Xa "T F[ 'VATr�IV � Sri ie \ORTfi CITY OF 0 1-,L:uxCI-lO C;CA.'N10\GA PLANNI \G DI -\'LID\ ITEM I: TITLE: F I iIBI T: G SG1 L: GONGEPTU!!L- CRAM" t .n u.u_. nr I1,uacJ I ! NORTH CITE' OF Pi ANTI_ \G I ivsii� N E1f�1�3tT: _Imo_ 7 SG E: El M 7 t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY :BART I - PROJECT I17ORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be co=leted and submitted to -the Development Review Committee thzough the department -:here the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II o_' the Initial Studv. The Davelo =ent Review Committee will meeA- and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration Will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional info^...ation report should be supplied by the applicant giving further info_,a- tion concerning the prcposefl project. PROJECT TTTL : Two Industrial Buildinc,s APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: A.H. Reiter, III, P-0-Box 7250 Newport Beach A 92553-=;0 NAI--SE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE COA`TACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: A.H. Reiter, III, P_O.Box Newport Beach, CA 92658 -7 50 714/751 -4594 LOCATION OF PROJECT (S"'r AD02ESS ANID ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOC.7I„ REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AI7D THEE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: n Z�1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Two Industrial ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SOUAL 3 FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, iF A y: 5.33 acres and vacant land DESCRIBE THE ENHIRONNr'NTA1 SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAP: -_ry, PLANTS (TEES) , ANIMu.AIS, ANY CULTUPAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUC:'URES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH' A-CESS- SHEETS) Is the project Part Of a larger project, one or a series Of cumulative actions, which although individuals_ small, may as a whole have signilicar_t environmental imaact? 11 ld i a WILL TrIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial chance in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewa=e, etc.)? X 9. Create cha:, _4es in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X S. Remove anv existing trees? How mazy ?_ x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flanrnables or explosives? ® Explanation of any YES answers above: I.L�ORTMT: If the project invol,res the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CEP.TIrICAT_ION: I hereby certify that the statements fur._ished above and in the attached exhibits aresent the data and i :formation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that tba facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understan" that additional infor -ation may be required to be submitt-A before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Deveiopme.^ �w Co=nittee. i Date Signature _ Reiter, III Title 9-11 6 I -3 { i.ESID NTInL CONSTRUCTION The follo::ing information should be Provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planing Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the Proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: 'zPecific iOcation Of Project: PHASE I EfL-S? P`F -ASE 3 2:4 TOT.z L 1_ Nr,-�ber of single f Z'a11_v units: 2- N,:. ^,.ber of mu-1tiPle -a=il-v units: 3. Date P27050sed to begin cor-st= 3czion: S. Earliest date of — — - occuPancv- : "Cde1 i - 3 - ^ -d of Tentative 5- aEdroorrs Price Razlqe 1 1-4 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION A!"P`DYING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -15 - aEITER LOCATED 'EST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF 6TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTr'ICT (SUBAREA 16) WHEREAS, on the 27Lh day of May, 19184, a complete app l icatioi� was filed by A. H. Reiter for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of July; 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above- described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed prcject is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimen tal to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on July 11, 1984. SEC1710V 3: That Development Review No. 84 -15 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Functional glass window bands shall be provided on Building I west and south elevations; and on Building 2 south and east elevations. The final design shall be subject to approval by the Desian Review Committee. 2. A fluted or ribbed concret( texture shall be provided between ® all window segments, and or. entrance fin wail surfaces. All other elevatioe surfaces shall be lightly sandblasted. 13 Resolutiun No. Page 2 3• The concrete wall which spans Buildings I and 2 shall be fluted or ribbed concrete. A solid metal . between wail segments. shall be provided 4- A 62 -fool: distance shall be required for ail double loaded circulation aisles and parking areas - 5- Fifteen percent_ (15 %) of the gross parcel area shall be landscaped, per Industrial Specific Plan standards. g- F 5 -foot landscape strip shall ba required around the perimeter OF the parcel. 7. A master plan approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permit will be rcauired for the entire 18 acre site. The master plan shall conceptually illustrate access Points and building plots and landscaped areas. ENGINEERING DIVISION 1• A temporary drainage structure shall be provided tc ^'L Street, to be constructed of gunite. 2- Surface drainage shall be conveyed offsite through an underwalk drain system; eliminating all onsite detention or storm water in the Parking areas. 3. Prior to issuance of any building permits, a parcel map shall be recorded to create recognized lots for the project area. 4- The right -of -way width of the proposed streets shah conform to the master plan of Subarea 16. A standard street knuckle shall be provided at the northwest corner of the project. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 111-H DAY OF JULY, 1984 PLANNING CO'y'NISSION OF' THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: enris L. Stout, ,Chairman ATTEST- . Rick Gomez, Deputy ecretary 11 Resolution No. Page 3 u I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Flarning Commission held on the 11th day of July, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: irOES: C0,114ISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: \J El 6 O O O p o O S S N 6 6 0 u¢U O N6 O 6 cP o -cN22 c qn q' •� r q�0a =_'n V¢ ?N.n OrVL G..drO � 7C Y 'N p q V. oo ^NO C,,.Ey W N� y ` L p D i r i (i jiOfc�c � daJO`V n —� =ter nq 7q p�tE L C� c A i r S 1 D N 6 fi N L p V� 9 S Cy LyL^ E_y goi._401CV t CYd -yrN STW �qC O NCr nuL.�r P VLaCa C O y d V d N a d ` b r L q z: L V i� O 3 ^� D C= •CO V i a C C � d j • f O Y L O r c_ c C O C g 1 •� }� L a g q r` y _ a � O g C J O 9 y te r na ^icy __9 NCL _ _ COQ :•i q7.J .n 9N p_ C„ _dr �D CG p 6...rP dNC V yy �r ' F CJ °q Or dOyu C7. r qN p 9O `jL .EI L PNr 6O rdCQ C T d yC r VdN > i �� MV P C D C q N J— v nqL c 4 M C ddO °^J 06r.+ a,�° N d G�O`LNy q Vyp6 r qs ^ gdN aLr�CL \090. f>r r O 0 O O . yC��q do cq C CG O jyM Nua.- nO. .D..i r 6 O O O p o O S S N 6 6 0 u¢U O N6 O 6 E E c •� J > rgoL L F o � c p q V. oo ^NO C,,.Ey W N� y ny p� c =- 6y4 v c A i r S 1 D N 6 fi N L p V� 9 S a C ^ V C O y d V d N a ` b r L q z: L V i� O g D J O O V y O ar.V, na ^icy =I _ _ :•i v' q~� o o - c r L q q o= c p q dNC V yy �r CY GLiq CJ =I r VdN > i 6 9lTp e_>.r p� v nqL c 4 M y G' -go�dD d ti M 6 C r O r O 0 O O . yC��q do cq C CG O jyM nO. 6 E E E Q Z Qi �O i C E CC Tu q L G 4 - V Gr C N� " V =nq _ P C ✓ C L - Q C � d o N L V 7 d GC V N °v4 N L G N C q 4 � .n�c= d V ✓ ✓ pC e 5z! CPO � N O ✓ C p✓ C g V_ V „ ✓ V O L r �_ y O T V Y j n HG L�•L L� �✓ J V � O J 7 nL nL R °coL - „Lo z-'oa xC V C � ✓ ~ F D O L T O V✓ N - C L ✓ C - N qtV ✓ C e LL C N O. O VC =Y L TO pT C. ✓gym T N p O V C -1c �- V Y v Y J G O �sT uL'°`✓ ✓�G q G P�� G S ✓N �+ .• s x d L: r d` O J O - C ✓ l U � V d d C p r V 4 L N T O d P = � T v L� ✓t O L' �L.• !.t - -�C 2 L O✓ ° - ✓= T � -� P q oNL nNn ✓ > L. - "•9L V N e�cN r T � ri L n t � N n N ✓ p u �Owr - ` M � C - ^q ✓".. c POL C JnT -� E 7 ` n o ..� o�'u yT air i go d� � C H 9� 1 E✓ c -�� ^. C? T O i V 9 e 4 OL q M d rLC. V - p S y d G' ✓- � G - � � < jCCr Q O✓ ✓` V� VT r C L -= - j✓G -LL Tr` q G q S N O OEr' P N C y 7 •Ca ✓� V d p j �> C'i ✓>' g5> -VN TLD^. ..- -'oJ L Cr ¢q- q�C A - =r � a. vc oc nac ep - VT .vi�cq LP9 w -o'T - cI• lL. L _ V N- 9 g C C C � C O„ p V U J �� L C 7✓ L q � d C T q q € q✓ d ✓ L C ^+� ✓ N T p _ L L ✓ d V �' C d �' G y= J d✓ N O .-. N i V d✓ T _N L r-- N V A_ O ` P T g Z& C V✓ C r V V _4 L t y V 9 r N V✓ V~� N O V L V g S~...� OG .COEr _O nG N C L L 4 P� 6 J V l � T q� ✓ J p q T- ?C L dd ✓�c0`y i'Z T COp� CLV -2 <dC O L n N O d G✓ L O� G V n d✓ � r� C � pL. 6rV CCVO q VO _� QOV TNI- C T.0 _N _ONn G L� q d �� V V T L C' L O q ✓ ✓ G n �• C- C T V P L T L C = T O O 2 O n y V C ly .r V. l J r- L�` O � i L• C L. n� n O Or ✓ N V S 6 S V ✓ V C� q C L t q✓ T 6 d N O q 0� � M V S TNC V CC ND V ✓ J d O C O.M+•- r J C 4 <. d L C 6 r i p C N✓ 9 i co^ C C q L? ✓L n 'L�� -J u S (� g E n Y� nd O d E✓ - V T Y✓ COO f d_ - - P G' - i G c < O 6 V <✓ 0 6 4 o- V O C y.. � L 6� ✓✓ V r V P C JC O CAPS V`CT L OVN L`y 4P N T ✓ P ✓ L ✓d0 ✓T"'��r ✓ �L C'C J�C 1..f CV - �G`V'ON epOF nr q J` r C D�� . q 9 C a .n - p p q V� r V 4 L N T O d P = � T v L� ✓t O L' �L.• !.t - -�C iv VC -✓. � > T o ✓ n ` r T � L. qr t Qq 6L SVp n L —� ✓ ✓� N -�� N 6✓ G -.L.. Oy E7; E•.. � N E 7 b D T% C l0 �. j T E p � C H 9� 1 E✓ c -�� ^. C? T O i V 9 e 4 OL q M d rLC. V - p S y O V< L N V V q _ � � < L Q O✓ ✓` V� VT r C L -= - N N j C_ q Vn _ LV• V✓gVNG N_09 .a` l�d�G •Ca ^q -� cVT c^o .Vi "c: ✓>' g5> -VN TLD^. ..- -'oJ L Cr ¢q- q�C A V CNL V LP9 w -o'T - cI• lL. L _ V 6 9 C L ✓ i D > _N. N O_ = y G q r C G C J O• ry g N g L N L V L✓ _ O 7Z; 7 T O q� O C r V V _4 L t y V L C V r N V✓ V~� N O V L „Cn V- S~...� OG .COEr _O nG CpNOgI P> rTCV yVEYN � O- Yyr� C�q6 -T C 4 6'iO p✓'t CG:✓ ?C L dd ✓�c0`y i'Z T COp� CLV -2 <dC rTM -✓1 ^ pL. 6rV CCVO q VO _� QOV TNI- C T.0 _N _ONn K � ` G C- x l �• C- C T V P L T L C = T O O 2 O n y V T' C q C r q 9 D ✓ V < q ✓ C � q p � C T G L q <. d L C 6 r i O ✓ V C i o• _cL ✓L p N V 'E •re ✓_yn0 n CF c OrT. COO �LL L ✓ P CO 6. =' S L ✓- - 6 L r^ O C y.. � L 6� ✓✓ V r V P C JC O CAPS V`CT L OVN L`y 4P N T ✓ P ✓ L ✓d0 ✓T"'��r ✓ �L C'C J�C d E CV - �G`V'ON epOF nr q V G A N 9 C. y.. q d T _ �✓ V C A r G C C O O C p p V L l C ° d O T O C ..d �C/ q C G G T N✓ _ -� L r r Y V T O- V E ••� C P C ✓ C q q L •a G P- V V >- C C a G G.r - V O C✓ � O q d P. r C M GVVr✓ __ N_C _N N✓ V ` Lt N -'.- `� JO OlG� N L• VG>C G� V w O T N V +- n O d� y l O > E` Y C .r M J - L .^ N- �-L o V V ✓ C �� j� y t c S i L c n V V C L 1 n✓ T �_ V_ G 6 O < -ML Nq1 <U C6V P -E � ✓lMC9 ��<�.qG 6E✓Lp e� N F V V •�1 d `a -_ L e °y°id i Ppp q�. =..r q •LA 9 L T .� _ 'P uiiY« � j � � E9^ eq a .°,. " I _ Gc q = «rq,\♦ °° N > r V \°/ c g O d r V l q � G a'p ° r• C _ 9 `L N° ELLS q gPrC AtiO Y C qUr O0q Od6 V u_6'y dC N�C VU � Uri .�4VT — l I ONO_ qtr 0'p0 �a� q0 Od V9 L jyAQ •nq�C � L Cd y'•r �J G_Ll ° u O O O ✓ mo d _^ 9 ° ° A° n I d °_ > d L •� pq �_ q i'i `rGSrN_p =TU � 9NaQ .vr P� v G OV q6 C7gq 9 p OA N =9 6r _ O '• t q E rr V PG dr V V °'�? ` VJd� rp °d 3]l VNN 'rG° _ L q i`r rOpr Ud P« qtO J9 NL �l� —c0 « q c Ob.O.V �OOid «_ V C ..rA ••r G O~.,aq Pn FL's °Gp C � P j ��dG N��nT 4q ��> =C N JNr l 9 C' OJ9 CgOTN �T4q� ^ 0 0 0 ^— �. V P -J ' q Q1 V y N V C C — d N A «•° S C i l°i prr C�..y✓P r L � n9� q�rV « T-45 i ^I E 0 P „ d r_ S2. e L d C G a g— i • ^ C v d Z — L _ E r «d N _ •. y. C u_ O C G� G � O _ P •4.r i 4 �`• N C � V O_ 7 d� � O i N 9 O 6= v G 6 G C d� L •L• N 9' ♦ � O PY .�r�.� iC aN O °L�9 Lu 9v _i S •. g � • r d I E._ V^ S � Vy r= N^ •. OgOq� U Pd O •w qVN q VN N° N Oar �JC[ ^ OVj U `.= CCEN ^q •U..�N y ^y� 9r r•V.rOZ GGp� TO�q Ca =L y0 q c u I C� C p L G 9 P L n C a� O V � n', • C �� C� 9 V q� V =_ T M« r � �� C 6 O L � P V O= M�� p� C G L C •_.. ` V ` 2i 4 9� 9 `O YJ•. =G� �= P. ^NO ql C q ` qd LL 6R' O� 9 �9 M N .w4• 0 ¢ >n •n• O9 r9 V « N • _O 4 9 Q r y G` O q — 6Q '_ q L V 4 .rz O 4 C C O C r 9 O M � a•' O iN — q_ S_ v��4 °P q c� ^I _ � b q P< V " Q C^ NAM9 V Ong w r L 2 � 6N N L 4` _ i C O n• r N r C •u 9 N = i a4y.� A c° yam- c ° L Pn ^�•`•r r n I L� t CI r= r °" Lr a itoQ LL Jam` 9q�O NFr GW yY49d CNy Crt N J V} `` N; E 0 1 G O r �C �CN C.—Ca ML�q O G p G _ N T _ d LP p P< �MJCq OLrV ✓tea =� �a dPV cc T a C <c ✓7 O t. r— �� � G V� 4 C C” • _ O J J •+P` C ` r r G � I y I C C O E > ✓ q �� V O < O J ✓ F c < O iNV FO qC VL]a 9 �P .G+O da � V <� r ✓� G � '. iV tiT � � c�o� „J^�.ce ors. _°' �4 n c9_ a r ,a�Y✓'.M _ L 0. V �• ..' V a'Vi A c V 0 ` d V — = Y I l U p j' C <= �r '� I O 7 O m T O D V n✓ G q � O � V E S T Y Y q q .�.... N r •T ^ q D J V ![ � ` V M _ ✓ ✓ a � O. „ • ✓ _9 d. moo— —_ e�N<d� r °` aJ �� a° N —__ q.L. JI G a� ^JL O.. E < v C � ✓ � C D p V a 2�Oi�✓ j.Ya E. qp L v N S Y O =qO =W �'VaV' o q� �� �06� �✓ V I ).� a' W q a � 0 0 0AV .Gr. r� ^✓ d_ V O � Z _V a V � C p O T P� � .'� N G N N � O _ Y 6. J T� r rq-. � G L q.... IL✓O >✓ r .. = qr � q0 VM _ V —L C O V c _ D.' ✓� O �Or 9 .. P �✓ w..' q ✓ ° V C_ V O N O V L✓ >d 2` O °Y J D 1� P V a O � g V p ~ � M =� q 0✓ tTI d l r C l �� N �,E v E.r >��6 a s c— Cr` a — g o G-Oi✓ ✓ C< C � O^ N A .' e C Q Pr •< V C V Na q~ 4.5 N _ N q q° C L � r V g O 9=; N V r V 116:5 >�� -c °v2u VV Y �✓ _� W `cr rc c c` "area cY °YUP y _ nv =ice off.. cqq ua< Wo Yoa O I cr u � � _ . o V � � � r N C 7 6 U q C V y� _ O V ✓ c � O _ N n ° � V� Q � N ✓ O Y q O L O� d O � iI — C u •d O q — r0. rVW LU6DLN p.�q�, N 6Va WN�V .°o Wyy �° i =OI Ii NI Nil< 000.2 6✓ ✓I N N °I = C G O r ✓ .L.. O G p G _ N T q r— � V C ✓7 O t. r— C G V� 4 V Q C” • _ O —� Q ` r r G � I y I C C O E > ✓ q �� V O < O J ✓ F c < O iNV FO qC VL]a 9 �P .G+O da � V <� r ✓� G � '. iV tiT IC L �^ O N S Y r C E q� �✓ V ✓ O 2 � 0 0 0AV .Gr. q N G N N � O _ Y 6. J T� r rq-. � G L q.... IL✓O >✓ r .. = qr � q0 VM _ VO —L C NOW✓` r V C p� >d r IO O °Y a O _ —C TY q 0✓ tTI d l l �n- �,E g o ',joy ,? .'� _ ✓" .' e '° y c ogo° N Na q~ 4.5 _ N ✓ C L i g O 9=; N V r V 116:5 >�� -c °v2u VV Y �✓ _� W `cr rc c c` "area cY °YUP y _ nv =ice off.. cqq ua< Wo Yoa O I 6 O C V y� W l> fE.r O O L C O � Y ✓ O Y q .G.. C Nil< O Y U N 0 U P ✓ V q .O• V CD C q- U C L > Na V V V C y V V l It V q O 0 27 2 4 _ yd V YL U q✓ N N E O u O b ^ai— q_ � E •a d � � y Y •^ r L O •Li• tV. a V r L ° y I O'• V „ V V O C y C•^ dE a N_. qi � ua O C q • N ^ q q �• V a P C^ � N - ' r y C y O > O � � P L C a G C O' rT.n — L 4 V v� an La N C- c y o v a L ^r .Nr•C �^ io U V v ^ E = _ ` ✓ o $v n N 7 = Y O O C • 6 O L a V � r q p O -J C l � G n q ^ OI d P r .°.• � F� O u- O j a i a u a q r n ✓ L r £ 4 •�V L � C��rT Y✓ CC GO �.NCa O'Y L � s cr �; yuc ° `• U •yn V P m �p 9 C N N N M rr•�b NO N� r�`Y= £2 VU FQ c� _i Prt� Cy P C3 ' N GT .O• -' ��" =VrT. C.°..S O•. X00 T PCN L � r �` °< ✓ °o�v� bP G °y 4 Lc .N. ^rJ E � o. O ZCLV rd u C O> P L9C Oa O C= _ V a .✓I C C y N S r � r l a V p G y r Tq a'. L EaVr q�rC NV`CZ UaT `rC+ -_oa —c g r q C M G O q V r .0i 6_ E _+ q q✓ •L's N^ 0 W a � r o N _ S 4. d ` g C G C M ` V -"• C L I D q n �.r Y� C C E vy ° goy_ r-�a �'6`_L•i •�^ e d ^ °-� — e`G•� �� quo co Nc Lc 40 q r €_✓ ^ �r L ^✓ Nan ✓ C v i CN L u E G o. . O •. u %i adi � n ,C °•P� C D C .' nP o GgC.L °r e G. >v"c —a ^.-• {Li E N ? Pa °ya LN s aNNi� ° o _ P>ae .o. ✓?c 9Pa� � o� t c° ea = ¢� c 4� Pa yLq•c oco4 �-°i� roNOb ` c dLeN L N^ V —o a °a°J °.= d�c GP✓ .Li•__ _� .T..rd..d.�e c •', c e V4eo °•'_e,Sa' O•� � O O O� �I n y' � N�O W r E a P S c i O E E P C t G c E V� n� t G d Lo`oa N��b Noa a D� ✓ L O L `� O�V V >� L 6 O C - C u u L O N D u u N V C C N • ✓ V OOE J U w L f O9 a ry N L l N r.�.. M N� N =b M b rP PN i C q N e �= J •e s` r aV n� _ —�✓ u P V aEq �• iu °.°. LT _N� �^i � V Nl A C L6u �✓° Vr°i = ry y (1 Ou✓ `^ V C�P9i ?i Y O C ✓ O - O a q O d � C T � d 0 �• q c VN ✓ iF O Pb �O�r Ny Y� RS O q p c L r V C O G m avN E y 1 �� y 'E �; ✓ Y b U l b ✓Gi6 LV � Ond 06 N V V 4 —_ W q N� V V✓ O✓ J N q u C O �✓ V N N n A ✓ Ny � q _ C W b q V =N MV i y` ✓ _ n T t Gc0 ncj.Ce_ C° 9' q -NU a P S c i O E E P C t G c E V� n� t G d Nd N��b ✓ O L `� O�V V >� L 6 u C P v O V C C N • ✓ V J U w L f O9 L l N r.�.. M N� 4• _ i C s` ` —�✓ G N LT � vq a o� �✓° = ry y ?i Y O C ✓ O - O V C N d q iF Pb — � ✓ q ` C O G -4,; 1 /� N V V q J N q u C � �✓ V N N n A I y b q V ✓ V i y` C O n T t Gc0 ncj.Ce_ C° 9' q -NU S � ✓q V � y nG E L q.Ga `_•p yG P Nd � a E O n P e �°.Lt• _ > C� V _N I� tll n L�q SU E � ✓ 6 � V ��_ � C � P• W Y a L l L q O _✓ ' L y L G < q I ii.Tp P✓ I O cC C'4Cr w E- O nC Or Cd q S r q n ° y N ✓° q P ° C q S I -JN S v g r O— G P n C pDg O �• A V° g T V q C✓ N v °�" w°. LeL�Cc '• b r a O EN C r ° I TY ✓ O Q Q V i O C✓ L u y Q N r N — 9 C q b q r V O V -0 0 ✓ V q 1 N Gu � _ _ 6 p e V t G d Nd N��b ✓ O L `� O�V V >� L 6 u C P v O V C C N ✓ C b T�� U w L f €I G r.�.. M N� 4• '•� =f i C s` ` —�✓ G N LT it y ?i s� iF t G d Nd N��b ✓ O L `� O�V V >� L 6 u C P v O V C C N ✓ C b T�� U w L f ` G r.�.. M N� 4• '•� =f i C unV ` —�✓ G N LT L V y n L .r T L L N O d W T G✓ p I 4 n t Gc0 ncj.Ce_ C° 9' o. °nV n'` E L q.Ga `_•p yG P Nd � a V P e �°.Lt• _ > C� V _N I� tll n L�q SU E � 6 � V ��_ � C � P• W Y a L P L L 1 G < q I ii.Tp P✓ I O cC C'4Cr w E- O nC Or Cd C q S I -JN S v g r O— G P n C pDg O �• A V° g T V q C✓ N v °�" w°. LeL�Cc '• b r a O EN O q T a .Li.— V a 6 N r N GP N Gu _ 6 p e O O U CI 1` V r 7 I d L 1 d0 q V D C T v^ I « C l O O r _ CO aV V d I c I e r O i I I S l L I I - , o ccn° c I � ^✓ I CJt°j da ^I �I P _ 9 J✓ � q O i "• I � D .' a Vim•` q•e = M a 9b qvo^ I a. —o. r✓i = ^ ax =o i ^a C ✓q - q G^ LS «l L d t O � L I r —i: ✓V a0 LLD V a I .,« ✓� .Li ✓^ n Dom_` o y b D I r� al q `� � _ •.. -. v n,eT r ri � «v �m v � � c vq _... ai c�°n Dc` ( i sa,•� V co 4 a` G «< 1 I v o ✓ T � _ D s 4 v e o I e ... u` C V• I , V P j�f « p.r F q � �T OI 1 «�✓ I o� � qG^ o g a < a «— y 0 `� �.• q r 1 L^ -_ ^ 1 6i O Gw9 « i �Ot V <c ✓ riai� a e �O CO O�✓ 6.a+ ^ 6C� � I >� 4 CO °y 11 11 CJ CITY OF RAA'C1110 CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: July 5, 1984 To: Planning Commission From: Dick Mayer, Park Project Coordinator Subject: CONCURRENCE WITH VICTORIA WINDROWS PARK CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Park Development Commission and this Department have been working with the William Lyons Company towards the preparation of a conceptual development plan for the Victoria windrows Park. This approximately 8 acre park facility will be the first park built in the Victoria Planned Community. Located adjacent to a proposed elementary school site, the conceptual design for the park takes into consideration the needs of the school children, as well as the general community. Previous discussions with the School District have indicated the need for athletic field areas for softball, baseball and soccer sports and these facilities are incorporated into the park plan. Additionally, the plan proposes a parking area, a children's play apparatus area, a restroom building and walkways connecting to the adjacent residential areas. At the request of the Park Development Commission and the Equestrian Trials Committee, an equestrian trail has been incorporated into the park dev:lopment plan along the southerly perimeter of the park adjacent to windrows Loop. A significant factor in the design of the park was the retention of the existing eucalyptus tree wind rows within the park site. The conceptual development plan was designed in such a manner as to leave these trees intact, thereEy enhanc =-ig the overall aesthetic value of the park. The attached exhibit indicates the proposed plan for the Windrows Park pr•:ject. The Park Development Commission reviewed the plan and has recommended that the park plan be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and concurrence prior to being submitted to the City Council for approval. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission review and concur with the conceptual development plan for Windrows Park. CC: Bill Holley EXHIBITS TO BE DELIVERED UNDER SEPARATE COVER ITEM K 0 I,-] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI1;ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 11, 1904 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HAVEN AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY 1977 I. ABSTRACT: This report outlines the concerns and opportunities associated with development along Haven Avenue, and suggests a goal statement for the Haven Avenue corridor. In addition, several alternatives are presented for Commission review in the areas of land use, architecture and site planning. Staff is requesting policy direction relative to the goal statement and to each of the alternatives presented. II. BACKGROUND: Recently, significant concerns have been raised regar�c ng he land use, building configuration, site planning, and style of architecture most appropriate and desirable for Haven Avenue. Two projects which were recently denied by the Planning Commission highlighted the need for more defined design goals, policies, and development regulations far Haven Avenue. The Commission directed staff to prepare a Haven Avenue Study outlining the purpose of Haven Avenue, the desired image, and policy alternatives which the Commission may wish to pursue. The intent of the study is to provide clear direction to the development community as to the appropriate land uses and style of development for Haven Avenue between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. III. SETTING: Haven Avenue is located near the geographic center of the City and will be the most significant gateway into Rancho Cucamonga. The importance of Haven Avenue is highlighted by future and planned development which includes the County Law and Justice Center, the future Civic Center, and Barton Plaza at the north end of the study area near the intersection of Foothill Boulevard. South of the City, on Haven below 4th Street, the Ontario International Center is planned with a major hotel to be developed in the near future. In addition, Haven Avenue provides access to Chaffey College and will be a major entryway into Ontario International Airport. ITEM L PLANNING COMMISSIOI STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corridor Study July 11, 1984 Page 2 Another important aspect is the distinctiveness of Haven Avenue in relation to other "Special Boulevards ". The four most significant corridors in the City include Foothill Boulevard, Archibald Avenue, Milliken Avenue, and Haven Avenue. Each corridor has a distinctive function and should ultimately project a different image. Haven Avenue has the potential for high -end office development with a unique combination of direct access to the airport and Chaffey College, a major travel route centrally located in the City, and planned and developing high -end projects to spur future development. Foothill Boulevard on the ether hand is viewed as the hub of commercial activities wig. ,hasis on shopping center development. The :haracter of Arch,uald Avenue, for the most part, already ham been established with a proliferation of low profile industrial buildings and a mix of office, commercial, and residential land uses. Development of Milliken Avenue will be influenced by the adjacent industrial land uses which include Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial, General Industrial, and General Industrial /Rail Served land uses. Haven Avenue provides a rare opportunity for the City to enhance its image by providing intensive, high quality office and Professional development along a significant gateway into the co mu:i ty. The General Plan affirms that travel routes are prede_Tninant elements of the community's image since people observe the City while moving through it. The General Plan also encourages the distinctiveness of individual districts and roadway corridors and states that a consistent design theme is necessary to reinforce the image or the perception of a route. Language in the Industrial Specific Plan states that the Industrial Park category and Haven Avenue should be designed to )roject a "campus like image for firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment with high prestige value ". Typical uses include office and professional, research and develorment, light industrial, and business support services. Iv. CONSTIIAINTS: There are a number of current conditions which can seriously hamper implementation of the design goal for Haven Avenue. The most significant constraints were epitomized by the design of the two projects recently denied. They include the following: 1. High exposure along the corridor is attractive to retail commercial tusineses. c. The linear street frontage is conducive to strip commercial. The proposed buildings were designed to maximize exposure and visibility of individual shops. is 6 "-.)- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corridor Study July 11, 19V Page 3 3. Land costs along the Haven Avenue corridor require higher per square foot costs than other areas in the Industrial Plan. 4. The central portions of the corridor are not yet attractive to high -end office /professional. 5. Current market demiands. The above factors create pressures for development of commercially oriented projects or projects of an interim nature such as lumber outlets, car +gashes and similar uses. Expansion of the comuercial activities, however, will adversely affect the attractiveness of Haven Avenue for high -end office park development and will preclude the implementation of any design goals. Another concern is whether the desired character and quality of development can be maintained along the entire length of the corridor. Of particular concern is the area near 8th Street and the railroad tracks. This locatirn is probably the least desirable on the corridor considering existing lard uses and the limited access and visibility when the future railroau underpass is constructed. V. POSSIBLE CAUSES.- The pressures to develop commercial or interim projects along Haven Avenue are, in part, created by the following factors which the City has the authority to regulate: 1. Wide interpretation of the types and extent of commercial . uses permitted along the corridor. Listed uses in the Industrial Specific Plan pertain to all of Subareas b and 7, and no distinction is made for appropriate uses on Haven Avenue. 2. Subdivisions permitted and previously adopted along the corridor have generally created fragmented lot patterns which do not promote master planned development of office complexes or centers. Often the subdivider attempts to maximize the number of lots adjoining Haven Avenue for marketing purposes. 3. There currently are no adopted development policies or design guidelines specifically established for Haven Avenue. Current technical standards (parking, setbacks, design, etc.) do not provide clear cut direction as to the appropriate image or style of development. To alleviate the current ambiguity, development policies, land use regulations, and /or design standards which are intended to protect the corridor for high -end projects could be considered. The following section outlines alternatives for implementing the design goal for Herren Avenue. a?"_? PLANNING CO'1HISSIO:'7 STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corridor Study July 11, 1984 Page 4 VI. IMPLEMENTATION: E Considering the setting of Haven Avenue and combining the intent of the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan with input from the Commission, the following goal is suggested for your consideration: Encourage master planned development along the Haven Avenue corridor which enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image by providing an intensive, high quality gateway into the City and by promoting a distinctive, attractive, and pleasant office park atmosphere in a campus like setting with high prestige identity. This section provides alternatives which the Planning Commiss` may pursue to implement the design goal for Haven Avenue. The alternatives are categorized in three major topic areas: Land Use, Architecture, and Site Planning. Under each topic area, three alternatives ranging from virtually no change to substantial change in current text are presented for the Commission's consideration: A. Land Use: The intent of the following alternatives is to promote land uses and /or development which enhances Haven Avenue's image. The Commission may pursue and one or combination of three basic alternatives outlined below: Alternative 1: No revisions to allowable land uses along the corridor. Instead, rely on specific design guidelines regulating architectural form and site planning. The success of this alternative will depend on the effectiveness of the design guidelines, since the style of a building inherently determines the type of business which can locate in it. (As an example, a multi -story office building would not be suitable for a lumber or hardware store.) There will, however, be conflicts if market pressures for support commercial continue. On the other hand, if the design guidelines are not effectively implemented, the current ambiguity as to type and style of development desirable on Haven Avenue will remain. Alternative 2: Establish a tangible floor area ratio which sets a maximum percentage of any building that racy be devoted to support commercial uses. M ll 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corridor Study July 11, 1984 Page 5 This alternative would provide clear direction as to the amount of each project or building which may be devoted to support commercial. Projects which are solely of a commercial nature would not be permitted. With this alternative, the Commission must establish the appropriate percentage of support commercial, such as 101" to 30 %. Alternative 3: Establish a set of permitted uses specifically for Haven Avenue. Haven Avenue is located within Subareas 6 and 7 of the Industrial Specific Plan. The listed uses apply throughout each of the Subareas and little direction is provided as to the types of uses that may be appropriate on Haven Avenue. The following table lists all of the permitted and conditionally permitted uses in Subareas 6 and 7. To aid the discussion, a remark column is provided suggesting whether or not the current status of each use is appropriate on Haven Avenue. ALLOWABLE LAND USES - SUBAREAS 6 & 7 Permitted Uses 1. Custom Manufacturing (Jewelry, furniture, clothing, etc. with on site sale of goods produced) 2. Licht Manufacturing (includes research & development, laboratories) 3. Light Wholesale Storege & Dist. (Includes mini- warehouses and rail served buildings) 4. Administrative and Office 5. Building Maintenance Services 6. Bus. Supply Retail Sales /Services 7. Business Support Services Remarks Consider CLIP for on -site sales Appropriate Typical architectural style undesirable and loading dock areas difficult to screen. May be undesirable. Appropriate Outside storage of maintenance trucks and equipment may be undesirable. Appropriate Appropriate PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corridor Study July 11, 1984 Page 6 8- Eating & Drinking Establishments 9. Financial, Insurance,Reai Estate Serv. 10. Hotel /Motel il. Medical /Health Care Services 12. Professional Services 13. Administrative Civil Services Conditionally Permitted Uses 1. Automotive Rental 2. Auto /Light Truck Repair - Minor 3. Automotive Sales 4. Automotive Service Station 5. Building Supplies & Sales 6. Convenience Sales & Services (i.e. drug store, barber shop, cleaners) 7. Entertainment (i.e. theaters, dance & meeting hails) 8. Fast Food Appropriate Appropriate Appropriate Appropriate Appropriate Appropriate Fleet storage would require large parking area. Unattractive storage of cars to be repaired, open service bays and noise. Large parking /display areas necessary, inconsistent with streetscape goals. Typical architectural style inconsistent with high -end office. Typical warehouse building form and unattractive loading and storage areas. Appropriate with SUP Appropriate with CUP Typical architectural form and drive - through aisle out of place with high -end office buildings. 11 E 11 14 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corridor Study July 11, 1984 Page 7 9. Food & Beverage Sales a. Mini - Markets Discouraged b. Liquor Stores Discouraged c. Sandwich /Ice Cream Shops Could be permitted with CUP d.Bal:ery Appropriate 10. Funeral & Crematory Services Undesirable 11. Personal Serv'ces a. Day Care Appropriate b. Travel Bureaus Ceuid bp D2rmitted :a /o CUP c. Photcgral.hy Studio Could be Permitted w/o CUP d. Driving Schools May be inappropriate ,2. Recreation Facilities a. Skating Rinks & Bowling Alleys Large bulky architectural style may be inappropriate; ok w /CUP ( ?) b. Health Clubs Appropriate c. Golf Courses Low Intensity 13. Cultural a. Museum Appropriate b. Art Galleries Appropriate c. Libraries Appropriate d. Observatories Appropriate 14. Public Assembly Appropriate 15. Public Safety & Utility Services Appropriate 16. Religous Assembly Appropriate 17. Ball Fields Appropriate 18. Public Meeting Halls Undesirable ae 7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corridor Stidy July 11, 1984 Page 8 B. Architecture: The objective of this section is to encourage intenssive, high quality, and prestigous office park development along Haven Avenue. The following are three basic implementation alternatives: Alternative 1: Require °high quality° projects but set no policies or standards for the theme or character of architecture. This alternative relies on the current Design Review process. In addition, a great deal of flexibility is provided for the individual designer. The fault of this system is that a cohesive style of architecture will most likely not occur over time, and the Commission will have to take a strong stance relative to denying projects which in its opin = do not meet the stated goal. Because of the subjective nature of _sign, it is unlikely that a consistent approach can be maintained over an extended period of time. Alternative 2: Establish generalized policy statements which ,elate to the desirable architectural theme. This alternative could reduce some of the current ambiguity as to the City's expectations for Haven Avenue. As an example, particular key words such as progressive, modern, sophisticated, or urban, can be highlighted to help set the desired architectural tone. Also, the designer will be allowed flexibility, but only within the parameters of the stated theme. For example, if a progressive, high tech architectural theme is established, a spanish style or traditional style building would clearly be inconsistent. Alternative 3: Establish more specific design guidelines which spell out the desired architectural thence, form and mass, and materials, texture, and signs. This approach would go beyond the second alternative and provide design guidelines for building height, bulk, office configuration, materials, texture, and signs. As examples, the guidelines could encourage multiple story office buildings versus low profile linear or warehouse structures and incentives could be provided such as not increasing setbacks for buildings over 35 feet in height. This approach could go as far as to specify materials such as steel and glass or poured in place concrete with accent treatment and more traditional building materials such as wood siding and shake or tile roofs could be discouraged depending on desired theme. In addition, standards for particular types of signs could be Developed, such as prohibiting wail can signs. � i E] PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corridor Study July 11, 1984 Page 9 The above alternatives are dependent on how far the Commission cazi go in terms of defining the Haven Avenue image. The Commission may wish to establish more specific guidelines in areas where there is a clear consensus while providing more general statements in other areas. C. Site Planniria: Tije objective of this section is to promote integrated master planned developments, enhance the visual quality of the Haver. Avenue streetscape, and provide av attractive and pleasant working environcent in a campus like setting. As with the alternatives in the previous section, the Commission must determine how specific the design guidelines for this section should be. The Commission may wish to: Alternative 1: Rer- rulate site planning through the Development Review process with no new policies or standards. Alternative 2: Bev,--lop general perfor¢apce standards which outline carat site plarm�,ng is expected to accomplish (i.e. integrated master planned development, attractive working ® environ.ment, etc.); an'i, Alternative 3: Establish specific desig:. guic�eiines to re- .11ate vrr'sous aspects of site planning (such as lot coi,f-iguraticrr, buiidin, placement, and circulation). To implement the objective.- of this section, four areas dealing with site planning have been identified and include master planned development, site orientation, streetscape /landscaping, and pedestrian environment. Any ore or combination of the above aiternati;es may be aopliea to each0these _areas as discussed below. A. Master Planned Development-: To encourage integrated and master plan development, design guidelines could be developed which regulate the following: Lot pattern Lot laze Lot dimension Reciprocal parking and access easement Access to adjacent parcels Requirer,ents for master plans As mentioned previously in this report, developers generally attempt to maximize the number 31F lots adjacent to Haven Avenue. The current ptzrrel size is two acres with a minimum width of 200 feet. To enc -urage integrated development, guidelines could be developed to increase :Te minimum lot size to five acres, unless a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corridor Study July 11, 1984 Page 10 E master plan is prepared which addresses items such as building pad locations, parking, and circulation. Another means would be to increase the parcel width to 300 feet (consistent with current standard for separation of drive approaches) and require shared driveways with reciprocal parking and access easements. In addition, a standard for lot depth could be established (such as 225 feet to ensure the full 45 -foot streetscape setback). B. Site 0rientaticn: Design guidelines which could be developed under this category include: Encourage building placement near the street setback Discourage linear building configurations Encourage smaller parking pods Restrict and combine access to Haven Avenue Ensure safa and convenient pedestrian circulation Encourage development of pedestrian plazas Policies and /or standards for site orientation which could be provided are all interrelated and must work in conjunction with the other policies in this section to fully implement site planning objectives. C. streetscape /Landscaping: Design guidelines in this category could: Require all utilities underground Provide attractive and consistent street furniture (i.e. street lights, benches) Require changes in street pavement, color, and texture at key intersections Limit visibility of parking areas from the street The City currently has standards for landscaping along street frontages and in parking lots. The intent is to expand upon those standards to foster a distinctive image for Haven Avenue as opposed to other special boulevards. 10 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corridor Study July 11, 1984 is Page 11 D. Pedestrian Environment: Design guidelines in this category would help to define the elements which create a campus like setting. Guidelines which -ould be developed relate to the following: Pedestrian nodes or plazas Landscaped pedestrian areas with benchs Outdoor restaurants and eating areas Convenient pedestrian circulation on and off site Proximity to public transit stops The Industrial Specific Plan currently has design guidelines for open spaces. These guidelines, however, are too vague and need to be Expanded to be more applicable to the Industrial Paris category in general and Haven Avenue. VII. RECOMMFNDATION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission provide direction to staff as to the appropriate alternatives for implementing the design goal for Haven Avenue. In girder to pursue the study, staff will need policy direction in the following areas: 1. Agreement and /or direction relative to the goal statement for Haven Avenue. 2. Direction relative to land use (Alternatives 1 -3). 3. Direction relative to architecture {.alternatives 1 -3j. 4. Direction relative to site planning (Alternatives 1 -3), espectfuY7Tj sutxniLted, is tiGemez ify Planner RG:CJ:3r 11 ll E I] E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONuA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 11, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Gary W. Richards, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: SIGN AMORTIZATION PROGRAM ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is to provide a program for the orderly removal and /or correction of signs which became nonconforming due to the adoption of the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance in 1979. BACKGROUND: When the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted the Sign Ordinance to replace the existing County ordinance, all signs existing within the City at that time which did not meet the criteria of the new ordinance were defined as legal but nonconforming and were given a five (5) year amortization period in which to be brought into conformance or removed, inis 5 -year amortization period expired on May 4, 1984- Therefore, according to the Sian Ordinance, all signs which became nonconforming due to its adoption must be: (1) Removed according to the amortization program; or, (2) Brought into conformance with the adopted Sign Ordinance. Options to these alternatives include signs with historical significance or hardship cases. REVIFW OF PROPOSED PROGRAM: The following amortization program has been developed to bring these signs into conformance with the adopted Sign Ordinance or removed. This program includes a major versus minor violation concept for the purpose of correcting t e more flagrant violations first. Therefore, nonconforming signs which exceed current sign requirements by 50 percent or mare. for height, size, type, location and number, shall be classified as major sign violations. Due to limitations in staff resources, a list of all businesses and the nature of violation is attached. These violations will be abated first under this program. Signs which do not exceed the current sign requirements of height, size, type, location and number by 50 percent will be classified as minor sign violations. These violations will be abated through current correct ?on provisions for nonconforming signs. As the uses change ownership or make building revisions, processing of these violations would proceed. All potential violators will be sent a letter apprising them of their status, the nature of the amortization program and the options available to them (see attached). The notification process will include the ITEM M PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Sign Amortization Program July 11, 1984 rage 2 issuance of two violation notices. The initial notice will inform the sign owner of the problem and request a response within thirty (30) days as to Veir intentions of either removing or bringing the nonconforming sign into compliance. The second notice will be accompanied by a warning citation extending to the sign owner ninety (90) days in which to remove or bring the nonconforming sign into compliance. If at the end of this time period the sign in question has not been removed or brought into compliance, a citation will be issued ccmmencina the legal action process. An appeal process wili also be available to owners of nonconforming signs. if an owner disagrees with the City's decision to classify their sign as nonconforming because they feel their sign meets the criteria for historical significance or hardship cases, they may apply for a decision of the Planning Co,,, ission within ten (10) days of receipt of the initial notice of violation. News releases regarding the sign amortization program have already been written and released for publication in the Chamber of Commerce Resource and the City Grapevine informing the public that the 5 -year amortization period has elapsed, and that the City will be commencing it; initial notification process. Future news releases are scheduled for the Rancho Cucamonga Times. Option- to this process include signs which have historical Significance. Upon written request by a sign owner, the Planning Commission has the authority to allow nonconforming sions to remain if they feel the sign in question is of historical significance to the community and that it meets the criteria noted in the Sign Ordinance. Historical signs should be signs which have been identif;ed as those having had an integral part in the early development and establishment of our community. Staff has indicated which signs may have that designation based upon the intent of the Sign Ordinance. Another option available to nonconforming sign owners is that of hardship status. Again, the owner has the responsibility of applying in writing to the Planning Commission. The Commission has the authority, according to the Sign Ordinance, to permit retention of a nonconforming sign if the owner can clearly demonstrate that an extreme hardship or unusual circumstance exists which warrants the rentention of the sion. REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES: There are three (3) possible alternatives to sign amortization: 1. Require full compliance of all nonconforming sions according to the Sign Amortization Program with specified time periods for removal. ` V.,2- E PLANNING COA,MISSION STAFF REPORT Sign Amortization Program :uly 11, 1984 Page 3 2. Require full compliance of all major nonconforming signs within: a specified time period. 3. Implement an ongoing compliance program for all nonconforming signs. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that alternative number two (2) be implemented along with the proposed notification program noted in the text of this report. Submitted, Planner RG:GR:jr Attachments: List of Violators (To be delivered under separate cover) ® Example of Letter to .Potential Businesses Sign Requirements X -3 PROPOSED SIGN ORDINANCE VIOLATION LETTER On April 4, 1979, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Sign Ordinance that recognized the need for signs as a means to identify businesses, an- :he importance of signs as a design element within the Community. This Ordinance was adopted attractive in order to make our city to residents, visitors, and commercial, industrial and professional businesses, while maintaining economic stability through an attractive signing program. All signs existing within the City at the time of adoption which did not meet the provisions of the new ordinance were classified as legal, but r- nconforming. These nonconforming signs were given a five (5) year amortization period in which to be brought into conformance or removed. Your { T Sign j sign was classified as nonconforming because ( Reason or NonconforT ), and V. •efore must be brought into conformance or removed. In certain cases, owners of nonconforming signs may apply for the designation of Historical Significance or Extreme Hardship. Historical signs should be signs which have been identified as those :laving had an integral part in the early development and establishment of our community. Extreme Hardship signs are signs which clearly demonstrate that an extreme hardship or unusual circumstance exists which warrants the retention of the sign. If you believe your sign lies within the realm of the above designations, a request must be made to the Planning Division within ten (1G) working days. Such requests are heard before the Planning Cotmnission prior to action. The City has adopted a Sign Amortization program which provides that you respond to this notification within thirty (30) days as to your intentions in correcting this violation of the Rancho Cucamonga Sign Ordinance. Your response should include the following: 1. Within a period of not more than ninety (90) days, the correction or removal of the nonconforming sign. 2. Description and drawings of revised plan with attached sign application permit. 3. Timing of correction measures. Our staff, or Gary Richards, will be glad to answer any questions you may have regarding this matter. 'Feel free to contact this office between 8:03 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at (714) 989 -185 ?. Thank you for your cooperation. 11 !7 ` 7 11 E G. Nonconforming Signs 1. Intent of Provisions. It is the intent of this chapter to recognize that the eventual elimination of existing signs ;hat are not would vi s t the title, is as important as is the prohibition of nelw signs that would violate these regulations. 2. General Reauirements (a) A nonconforming sign may not be: 1. Changed to another nonconforming sin. 2. Structurally altered to extend its useful tie. 3. Expanded. 4. Reestablished after a business discontinued for sixty days. 5. Reestablished after damage or destruct`on of more than fifty percent of its value, as determined by the building official. (b) No new sign shall be approved for a .ite, structure, building or use that contains nonconforming signs misess such nonconforming signs are removed or modified to conform w`_h the provisions of this title. (c) No building permit shall be iss: (=j for any structures, building expansions or new building cons':uction on a site which contains nonconforming signs, unless on signs on the site are brought into conformance with this title. 71, does not include interior alterations site. which do not substantially change the character or intensity of the 3• Amortization Recuirements (a) Every sign which does not comply with the provisions of this title shall be amortized in accordance with the foLowing schedule: Value Time Period Signs under $250 ays d $250 -5500 i1S0 800 tear $500- 51,000 2 years Over $1,000 (b) The value of a nonconforming sign shall be determined by the building official in accordance with the latest mdieri -- valuation schedules. (c) Time periods for amortization of nonconforming signs shall begin from the effective date of the ordin>."-e codified is this title. Anv sign which becomes nonconforming cit!Iar by reason of amendment to this title or by annexation to the city, -hall also be subject to the Provisions of this title. The period of time within which such sign must be abated shall commence upon thl: effective date of such amendment or annexation. l 0 4. Historical Sirs. Signs which have historical significance to community but do not conform to the provisions of this title may be allo.:ed to remain provided that the Planning Commission makes the following findings: (a) The sign has historical significance for the community. (b) The sign does not create nor cause a traffic hazard. (c) The sign does not create a visual nuisance to the character of the community. (d) The sign is properly maintained and structurally sound. (e) The sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties. S. Hardsl io Cases. Under cases of extreme hardship and unusual circumstances, the Planning Commission shall have the authcrity to allow the retention of a ronconforming sign if the Commission specifically finds that extreme hardship and unusual circumstances exist. The proponent of such request, shall have the bjrdan of clearly demonstrating that an extreme hardship and unusual circumstance does exists and warrants the retention of such sign. The planning Commission shall conduct a public hear ;no. The procedures for conductin5 the puolic hearing and application fees ;hall be regulated by the variance procedures and fees established by the City Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission shall use the foLowing findings for determining that an extreme and unusual circumstance exists: (a) The site has a unique character or features that causes visibility problems. (b) The sign does not create a traffic hazard. (c) The sign does not create a visual blight to the community. (d) The sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties. (e) The sign is properly maintained and structurally sound. (f) No other signing alternative or design would be feasible or be able to provide reasonable signing in accordance with this ordinance. If the Planning Commission finds that an extreme and unusual circumstance exists, but that the design or condition of the sign creates a visual blight, then the Commission can grant a relief from the amortization of the nonconforming sign with the condition that the sigr be remodeled to a more aesthetic design. If a business or shopping center, found to have the above hardship and which contains nonconforming signs, is remodeled, then the Commission shall have the authority to request that the nonconforming signs be upgraded to match the design and architectural style of the remodeled buildings.