No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/07/25 - Agenda Packetro � :� �� { .,y -r � f �\ � 1t? � � J Y _ vl` i1��. 0, � t 4 I _ 1♦,� � � :� i ' S�! 6 h ,i• ti Y �::'' �w �,. �� r V ' 1 ;. � ;-i �``titt ail '::ui _ � Ik, � .�i Y `� � `.�. f /' � �`I � '� 0 i :��i: � w. rte; :� 7, � i F Y� c f "_ .. '. Y T'. y P ✓' T Q j .y 4.. . s' .� M. ti. + �� �4 `� i _ I '' . L +{ ..v _ _' . i �'' ;1 I ,� '1 , ._ i r. �:: �r ,•. _,r - -__ . -,j j' `. �' �.�. . 4 a .y TS 1. I ^� Jti�� r .�. "' � \ .. +v. f �".. _� e:. k� Vh s� .K+ 7 �' A L . "' Vii- 1, w?i t..,;I�K LL. �_ tr :+Y JA e(C LAtJ CITY OF RAtiCHO CUC VN'-0_ \GA PLANTING. CGvI-j�vIISSIO -\T AGENDA . WEDNESDAY July 25, 1984 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA L Pledge of AIlegianee IL Ron Call Commissioner Barker Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Stout Commissioner McNiel M. Announcements IV. Approval of Minutes June 13, 1984 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- cantroversiai. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REV 11 84 -20 - GA ERIC - The development of a 50,972 square foot industrial- warehouse building on 2.64 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 1) designation located on the south side of 7th Street and east of Utica Avenue - APN 209 - 411 -06 and 07. VL Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait co be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. 0 AL _. - -- — - .ca3aa:.LZN AVj -n review of the environmental assessment for -a proposed master plan for 936 apartment units located on approximately 58.3 acres on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Haven Avenue in the Medium -High Development District - APN 202 - 271 -59, 69. �. TENTATIVE TRACT 12365 - LEWIS - A request for approval of carport screening material and modifications to conditions of approval for same. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE S nQ97 — 1) er7Crr1 IU'UT7mr! — a 4nt.v ..a development of 294 single family homes on 57.7 acres of land in the Low (2-4 du /ac) and Low - Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Residential Districts generally located between Haven and Hermosa, south of Wilson Avenue - APN 201 - 181 -02, 12, 13, 14, 63, 65, 69, and 79. E. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -12 - CORNWALL ASSOCIATES - Proposed office addition of 625 square feet to an existing church with other minor landscape, retaining wall, parking lot improvements, security gates and storage building on 3.1 acres of land located in the Low Residential Development District located on the south side of Base Line Road and east of Vineyard Avenue - APN 208 - 593 -08. F. G. H. land use designations for certain 19th Street Corridor Study area. PLAN General Plan to modify the properties located within the ASSESSMENT AND PERMIT 84 -10 - BECK - The development of a tuuy automated car wash on approximately one (1) arse of land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 6) located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Jersey Boulevard - APN 209 - 142 -32. PARCEL MAP 8550 - WAUNLIK - A division of 15.12 acres of Tana in the General industrial District (Subarea 13) located on the soutneast corner of Rochester and 7th Street (APN 229 - 261-65 & 66). I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS }SENT AND PARCEL MAP 8649 - S1APSON STRONG -TIE COMPANY - A division of 10.169 acres of land in the Minimum Impact heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9) located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard, east of Vincent Avenue - APN 299- 143 -28. J. REVIEW 64 -13 - BARYIAKIAN -The development of two (2) warehouse distribution buildings totaling 78,940 square feet on 4.9 acres of land in the General Industrial category (Subarea 4) located approximately 250 feet east of Archibald, south side of 6th Street - APN 210 - 071 -50. ;k.. VIII. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. UL Adjournment The Pla;ming Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be hearts only with the consent of the Commission. COC MAP VICINITY �AR:O 1MlERFATrpyAt ArMORT C ry OF RAC CUCA a ti �� CITY OF RANCHG CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING June 13, 1984 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Dennis Stout called the regular meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. Chairman Stout then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL, COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: David Barker, Larry McNiel, Herman Rempel, Dennis Stout COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner; Dan Coleman, Associate Planner; Linda Daniels, Assistant Planner; Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner; Rick Gomez, City Planner; Edward A. Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, Joan Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Er_gineer ANNOUNCEMENTS City Planner, Rick Gomez, advised that the inland Empire Section of the American Planning Association will hold its awards banquet on June 21, 1984 at the Hungry Tiger Restaurant in Redlands and kill confer its honorable mention award for the City's Development Code. ;.dr'iticnally, Jon Mikels was selected to receive the 1984 Award for Outstanding Cont ^ibution to Planning, an honor given to an individual who is not in the Planning profession. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, ,tarried t!aanimously, to approve the Mirrates of the March 28, 1984 Planning Comm ssic: - meeting. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carried to approve the Minutes of the April 25, 1984 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner McNiel abstained. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by P.empel, carried unanimously, to approve the Minutes of the May 9, 1984 Planning Commission meeting. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to approve the Minutes of the May 23, 1984 Planning Commission meeting. CONSENT CA IitAR Motion: Moved b_v ReW"i ei, the Consent Calendar. s °conded by McNiel, carried desi' afor design ofUSE MIT gns for PER Church and Preschool to modification: B. Turner - APN tO77_277- located on the TIMr unanimously, to adopt to�the are northeast al corner of 20,000 (Si l tea acres of irsacT MAP 70246 an °o. ngle Fa —;lY residential /20 0 e on the southwest corner cf z 7D lots locate( 207- 771 -74. .000 sQuare Hi -lside R foot PUBLIC Road and Haven -� 1iE —OS C. .nw s r L R - Consideration re guest located at 7770 Archibald st exists fanner, Rick Gomez, n8 commercial use. reviewed the staff Chairman Stout opened the Public hearing. M'- Rick Nelson, 7770 =� knowing what he Archibald, the �Sreement wit. Planning findi nto. applicant, the of his very interested *r then o do with stated he was 71e re being no further Co. lot and expressed Commissioner McNiel statad , the public hearing was closed. now -eonfo there was use expansion a conflict in the Development �iaustant CitY Attorney `3Ad cited page 74 Pment Y Hopson , items C Code not as : C7 explains when and bow treat there G and F. inconsistent as it at is no explanation. an exssti conflict Mr. first appeang vse an be exPanded,at the it last omez , that G7� that stated the gives further was eliminated. He the verbiage was as set forth in the further explain added because Developmeizt Code that the the abatement schedule Commissioner Re °n a case b filings would have in the City �' el eXPlained dur' 3' case basis. to be met General Plan would dm°ntioned to be the nfortyr8lusl hear:. -rgs certain It was do nom have e is this areas manner hangedoLOr each ie a e s In order t=at the sc that expansion o. uses could u allowed, Further, A custom lot In the R -7- lot minimum) Averse - APN to expand a nor: - conforming use report and showed slides of the Planning Commission Minutes -2- June 73, 1984 Chairman Stout sated with respect to non-con-forming uses, the Commission should discourage any expansion, but since this expansion would be to the rear Of an exi:ti. ^_g str °etnr° and not really visible from the street, he thought if the Commission has the capability of bringing the front structure up to current City standards that may be the type of trade-off that would make the non - conforming use able to be expanded. Chairman Stout felt that a master plan for the site would be excellent and provided some comments relative to blending in with the residential uses near it as well as changing the roof to enhance it. Commissioner Rempel asked if Chairman Stout is referring to the new building or the old one. Chairman Stout replied that he is referring to both and that whai is needed is some type of landscaping and treatment. Commissioner Rempel stated that there will be another building between this one and the one proposed. Chairman Stout stated that he wculd rather have the architecture of the old and existing buildings upgraded rather than have the new structure brought down. Commissioner Barker stated that he was a little uncomfortable vith this but as long as there will be a master plan specifically aimed at the architecture and landscaping, and it will conform to the surrounding area. Mr. Hopson stated that this item should be brought back with a specific proposal and findings. Motion: Moved by Rempel seconded by Stout, carried unanimotisly, that this piece of property be allowed within the non- conforming use category with consideration of the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission and their future review. W V i i ■ D. ENVIRO!DENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -G5 - DANNA - The establishment of a recreational vehicle storage yard on 2.4 acres of land in the Low F,esidentia.l District generally located on the south side of Base Line, east of Hermosa Avenue - APN 1077 - 051 -40. Senior Planner, Tim Beedle, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Barker asked where 45 feet would be on the map when measured from Base Line. Mr. Seedle pointed it out and clarified that the measurement should be taken 45 feet from the ultimate fence line. Planning Commission Minutes -3- June 13, 1984 Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Mrs. Leona Dan ^_a, 10191 Base L-,nc, st-ated she h= no argument with moving the recreational vehicles back. However, she did not agree with the requiremen�- to put up a block wall and requested that dense shrubs and landscaping be allowed instead if they are placed in front of a chain link fence. Commissioner Barker stated that this was considered by the Desi -n Review Committee, but because Base Line is a Special Boulevard, a six -foot masonry wall is required because of what presently exists in the study area. He indicated that compatibility is the intent as well as providing a total screen to the storage area to the south. Mr. Larry Danna, 7026 Amethyst, indicated that they were concerned with Condition 2 on page 5 of the Standard Conditions which requires dedication of 27 feet of right -of -way and additionally requires her to pay for all improvements. Mr. Danna stated that the City is asking his mother to install a drainage system and now the Engineering Department is asking for proof that it works. He indicated that the City Engineering Department approved the plans and asked if they don't know if it works, how are the Danna's to know if it works. Mr. Gomez provided some background to this use and indicated that it was in existence prior to the City's incorporation, but was an illegal use which bad not been approved by the County, and is allowed in the City through adoption of a Conditional Use Permit. He indicated that this would make it a legal conforming use. Further, that the Standard Conditions are what the City requires of anyone. Mr. Hopson stated that the question was asked if the applicant does not go forward with the recreational vehicle yard, does the City have the right to take the dedication. Mr. Danna asked if she applied for the Conditional Use Permit, does she then have to make the dedication. Mr. Hopson replied that if anyone applies to the City for something that the City has the power to give or not give their consent to, as with a Tentative Tract Map, Parcel Map, Conditional Use Permit, or anything that is a discretionary request where a yes or no is given, then the City can condition the yes on certain things. One of the legal rights of the City is to get dedications of right -of -way as a condition or a "quid pro quo" as a trade -off for saying yes. Mr. Al Minter, residing on Latrine in Rancho Cucamonga, indicated he stores his vehicle in Mrs. Danna's yard and if she goes out of business, it will mean that 109 vehicles will end up in driveways. Planning Commission Minutes -4- June 13, 1984 Steve Killion, Rancho Cucamonga resident, questioned whether the previous applicant or the Edison. Company will al_o be required to put up a block wall. Terry Harris, 10210 Base Line, stated the need for a recreational vehicle storage yard and indicated that surrounding residents must put up with the smell and flies from the ad -Joining property owner. Mr. William Dannadento, 7462 Topaz, felt the City's requirements were a squeeze play inasmuch as a dra -page system has been installed and there is now a request for a block wall. He asked that the Edison Company also be required to install and pay for a wall. Mr. Don King, 9375 Archibald, representing Mr. Steve Husa, property owner to the south, indicated he was not there to protest the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit fcr the Danna property. He showed the Commission pictures of the Husa property and the drainage problems that exist, and requested that it be corrected. Further, that the staff recommendation is supported by Mr. Husa. Mrs. Dora McCreerey, 6896 Beryl, stated she was 4 life -long resident of this area and a problem with drainage did not exist until Mr. Husa flattened his land. She provides pictures taker„ from the Danna property to the Rosa property and indicated that she would rather see plants than walls. She stated that she felt the City was discriminating aga_nst a single woman. Mr. William Comstock, resident, felt the storage lo: is needed in order to accommodate people who would otherwise be ticketed for storage of a recreational vehicle on their property. Mrs. Linda Hirsch, resident, stated it was interest_ng that the City is requiring a block wall when they did not want one put in their tract in order to avoid a walled -city look., Mr. Minter again spoke indicating that the drainage plan was done by a registered civil engineer and had been approved by the City's Engineering Division. Mr. Art MacKay, Alta Loma resident, stated that the Danna's provide a desirable service to Rancho Cucamonga and if their Conditional Use Permit is not approved, it would force RV owners to go ouside of the City for these services. Mr. Bruce Retell, Red Hill resident, was opposed to what the Commission was planning to do in requiring so much to be done. He felt the requirementn might force Mrs. Danna out of business. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Rempel stated that he has some problems requiring some of the things included in the resolution in conjunction with the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit. Planning Commission Minutes -5- June 13, 1384 Commissioner Hempel stated that the City will work with Mrs. Danna tc establish payment for any improvements over a period of time rather than requiring her to-pay for them in L lump sum. Commissioner Hempel stated he would like the requirement for the block wall eliminated because there are other ways of screening such as the use cf an ornamental iron fence or dense landscaping. Commissioner Hempel stated that if the drainage is not intentionally diverted to one area of the adjoining property there should not be a requirement for a new drainage system. Commissioner Hempel asked that the requirement for the block wall be deleted sith a lot of landscaping instead and he asked that the City assist Mrs. Danna with the cost of the road work that must be done through a reimbursement agreement or some other process. Commissioner Barker echoed the comments made by Commissioner Hempel. Commissioner Barker stated that the Commission could use a whole bunch of modifications to the landscaping such as berms, dense planting and he appreciates this, but it does not address the high costs of the situation. Commissioner Barker stated that he is not an expert on drainage and must take Commissioner Hempel's word that if drainage is not specifically directed towards your neighbor, you are not accountable for it. Mr. Rougeau stated that since the street work is of primary concern, the City will later on be looking to complete its improvement program which includes a jo' for a a ._imal amount of widening on Base Line at Hermosa and Ivy which must be done because of traffic conflicts. Mr. Rougeau explained that when the Commission gives their approval to a project it does not have much choice nn what conditions it must require. By law, he stated, the package that comes to the Commission is presented in such a way that it complies in what the law requires. In the past, people have coordinated their projects with those of the City in order to reduce costs on the work to be done. In this case, Mr. Ro-,geau stated that the street wort: would cost in the area of $10,000 for the full amount which would include sidewalks, curbs and Tatters. He further stated that it could be less, but granting approval would mean that full street improvements must be made; however, it could be spread over a period of time. Mr. Hubbs, City Engineer, stated that it would not be a reimbursement agreement in the classic sense; it would be a participation or loan agreement and it is done in certain areas by the City Council. He indicated an attempt would be made to negotiate this with the City Council. Planning Commission Minutes -6- June 13, 1984 Commissioner Barker asked if this were to be done, would it be p*oziEr to cause the imposition with the recommendation to the City Council that long -term arr-- .- ements for payment be ua.de. Mr. Hubbs replied it would be appropriate. Chairman Stout asked since this is in a residential area would a Conditional Use Permit be granted. Mr. Gomez replied that is correct. Chairman. Stout asked if this were semantically called a temporary use, would these requirements have to be made. Mr. Gomez replied that this has been classified as a Conditional Use and not a temporary use. He explained there are time limitations between a Conditional Use and a temporary use. Commissioner McNiel stated he does not have a Bret deal of problem with what has already been said, but asked what kind of precedent will be set by deviating from the wall requirement because this is a Special Boulevard. Mr. Gomez stated that the only thing that would be precedent setting would be the chain link fence because this is a Special Boulevard. Commissioner McNiel stated that the Commission is not a villanous body, nor a discriminatory body, and they are not trying to put a lady out of business. He indicated that it is absurd to sta.;e this. He indicated that the Commission tries to make decisions according to law and based on conditions, and to have people come in and throw spears is not appreciated and is offensive. Chairman Stout explained how this type of use was allowed with the adoption of the General Plan and how previously it had not been allowed. Chairman Stout stated that if you arbitrarily start saying that someone does not have to do something here or there then the plans that you have set will not work out and are meaningless. Further, staff looked at what the law requires and simply stated that this is what it is, and no decisions had been made prior to coming in tonight. He indicated that based on what is required they can then see where any exceptions can be made. Sction: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -47 approving Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -05, with the deletion of the requirement for a masonry wall to be replaced with a combination of a solid wall and landscaping berms, etc., and that ehain link on Baseline or where visible not be allowea; the deletion of Conditon No. 3; the words "right -of- way" in Condition No. 2 changed to 'fence "; the word "paved" in Condition No. 3 changed to "surfaced"; and a recommendation to the City Council that they spread the cost of required improvements over a period of time. Plarning Commission Minutes -7- June 13, 1984 8:40 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 9:00 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. # # # # # E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -08 - S.. PETER /ST. PAUL CHURCH - A request to allow the operation of a preschool in an existing 11,645 sq. ft. building in conjunction with a church, located at the southeast corner of Banyan and Beryl - APN 1062- 381 -1. Senior Planner, Tim Beedle, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Father Charles O'Connor, representing the church, appeared to answer questions. Chairman Stout asked how it is proposed that the children be moved from the play yard to the school. Father O'Connor replied that they will use an escort for the children and explained what the ratio of children to -cupervisors would be as required by State law. Further, Father O'Connor volunteered that a peg or temporary fence, which could be removed, could be used to block off the walkway from the parking areas. Commissioner Barker stated that in approving other preschools there has been a requirement for a visible barrier to shield the children from vehicles. There being no further comment, the public hearing was closed Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution. No. 84 -48 approving Conditional Use Permit 84 -08, with the deletion of Condition No. 9 of the resolution, and a new condition requiring some type of fencing during the hours of school operation. F. REVISIONS OF THE Gu:'PAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT - In accordance with Article 10.6, Section 65580 of the California Government Code, a revision and update to the City Housing Element. Senior Planner, Otto Kroutil, gave an overview of the Housing Element and asked that before the staff presentation is made, consideration of special language be made for insertion to the Element that resulted from the 19th Street Corridor Study Committee's recommendation regarding affordable housing. Associate Planner, Curt Johnston, reviewed the staff report. Planning Commission Minutes -8- June 13, 1984 Commissioner Rempel asked where the 7 percent of people referred to on page A55 of the report live. Mr. Johnston replied that those figures are from the 1980 Census. Mr. Kroutil, Senior Planner, replied that HUD's and the Bureau of Census definition of overcrowding is more than 1.1 person per room and that would be a four person household living in a two bedroom dwelling. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. Daryl Nikolai, 6245 Dak,):a. asked where HUD proposes to locate future :sousing. Chairman Stout replied that this would be addressed shortly. Mr. Gomez stated that no new sites are contemplated and the Draft Housing Element Revision proposes no new sites. Mr. Nikolai asked if there is any type of restriction in location. Mr. Gomez replied that is a point the Commissic.- will cover. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Chairman Stout stated there is a policy statement that the Committee wants to have included in the Housing Element and it will bring the element into conformance with the recommendations made during the 19th Street Corridor Study. Further, Chairman Stout indicated that the Committee is comprised of Mayor Jon Mikels, Councilmember Richard Dahl, Commissioner David Barker, and himself, and resulted in the development of a policy recommendation that would limit Section 8 housing to its minimum limits with respect to subsidized housing within the City. Chairman Stout read the language: "While the City recognizes the fact that certain policies regarding subsidized housing have been legislated by the State and Federal governments, it is the intent of the City to limit this type of housing to the minimum amounts required by the State and Federal governments", and asked that this language be included in the Housing Element. Commissioner Barker stated that this would be in keeping with what the City must do in order to meet the minimum requirements, but no more than that. Mr. Hopson stated the language shoula say that it is the intention of the City to comply with all minimum standards of the State and Federal government rather than saying they will only comply with the minimum. Chairman Stout stated that is not what the Committee means. Rather, the City will only comply with the minimum standards. Planning Commission Minutes -9- June 13, 1984 Mr- Gomez stated that the only caution he would have i_a that the City :3 required to do certain things and he would not want to state a p olicy that would be in direct conflict with the State. Commissioner McNiel stated he agreed with the intent of the policy statement but there is no reason to red flag it in order to draw undue attention to it. Further, he agrees with compliance only to the minimum required. Commissioner Rempel stated that the policy statement could be pug into the approving resolution and not into the Housing Element itself. Mr. Gomez stated that this would be pra`1;!rable. Mr. Hopson indicated placement of the statement in the resolution would be appropriate. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by McNiel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -$9, recommending approve_'. of the Housing Element to the City Council which would include the policy state meat in the Resolution. Mr. Nikolai asked where such housing will be located within the City. u^. $routi.l replied it is a part of the 19th Street Corridor Stud o Will be nothing more to add. Y and th_re Chairman Stout esked Mr. Gomez to explain where HUD housing might go. Mr. Gomez responded that this is governed by the General Plan and Development Code and the policy that the Commission is dealing with is for the overconcentration of projects which would have more ths_l the 25 percent minimum so that the same problem does no: occur as the Woodhaven project on Lemon and Haven. Mr- Hopson stated that if there is an already built apartment and someone applied for Section 3 housing money, or rental subsidy money, and contracted every apartment unit in that already built apartment building, there would be nothing the City could do about it. Mr. Gomez stated that the City does have the power to voice its concern_ and obj -t *_o that but the Federal govern --ent is the overriding body and would make that approval. Chairman Stout asked for clarification on whether the City determines where these apartments will go. Mr. Gomez re5;,onded that the City gives the appropriate area for apartments but Handing is determined tv the Federal government. The City does not determine where they will go and it does have some input, but the Federal government can contract with anyone it wants to to construct those apartments. Planniag Commission Minutes -10- June 13, 1984 Mr Gomez replied this is correct; however, under this President there does not appear to be anv money for subsidized apartments. Mr. Larry Bliss, local developer, explained how the Lesny Development Company obtained its long term financing for this project and indicated that wnat the City attorney has stated is correct. He also advised of the difficulty of managing Section 8 housing. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by McNiel, carried unanimously, to jzc.,dify Resolution No. 84-49 to include the statement relative to subsidized housing and recommend approval of the Housing Element to the City Council. c } a a t G. ENV1 MAP 6786 - CROWELL BROTHERS - A division of 7.249 acres of land into 2 parcels in tae Office Professional District located at the southeast corner of Base Line and Carnelian_ - APN .J• Jv. Senior Civil Engineer, Paul Rougeau, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout asked that the specific division be outlined on the map. Mr. Hopson stated that if the developer wanted to enter into a ground lease for the parcel thus it would technically be a subdivision under California law. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. Gary Hines, representing C/L Builders, stated his concurrence with all conditions of the map. He indicated that the Exchange, which was approved through a Conditional. Use Permit several year;: ago, is completely improved at this time. He indicated currently they have a p-oposed restaurant which would go on this site. Chairman Stout asked what kind of restaurant it would be. Mr. Hines replied it is called Zaks and it would be like a Michael J. Chairman Stout asked if this site can handle parking. Mr. nines replied that this was fully developed several years ago, and was able to accommodate parking. Mrs. Linda Hirsch, resident on Colima Court, spoke for 14 other residents. She related the problems that have taken place since the Exchange Building was occupied and indicated that she and her neighbors have even proposed a block wall for which they would pay one -half the cost. She indicated that this was refused by M.^. Crowell, and he offered to slap them a home in Sunnymead instead. Mrs. Hirsch stated that this developer has never lived up to his commitments for landscaping, the drainage ditch, signs, and maintenance, and asked for assistance from the Commission. Planning Commission Minutes -11- June 13, 1984 Chairman Stout asked where the children, crossed through their lot. Mrs. Hirsch pointed to this on the map. Mr. Mitchell Hirsch pointed out that the only extensive landscaping in the back is oleanders and expressed concern because of their poisonous characteristics. There being no further comments, the publi-- hearing was closed. Commissioner Barker stated that the Commission does not have the original Conditions of Approval. Mr. Beedle explained that the Commission is dealing only with the parcel map before them tonight. Commissioner Rempel stated that if he remembered correctly, there was supposed to be some type of retaining tall because of the height differential between the residences and the Exchange Building, and a low wall to prevent light from shining into the homes. Commissioner Rempel stated that the parcel map could be conditioned to have some type of barrier along the property line. He indicated that this would do two things: prevent people from going through the area and yet not be unattractive from the homes. Commissioner Barker expressed concern with how that would be handled. He asked if this would come back. through Design Review or through staff. Mr. Beedle stated that if the condition is placed on the parcel, then the Engineering Division will make sure it will be completed. He indicated that the intent is to provide for adequate wall design and staff will assure that the condition it, made a part of the parcel ,cap. Commissioner Barker asked that dense landscaping also be required as a means of sound attenuation. Commissioner Barker stated that there should he a buffer for sound, light, a retaining wall, and upgrading of landscaping that was expected originally. Further, the access across the adjoining properties must be protected so that there is no further trespassing. Motion: Moved by Rempel, :;econded by McNiel, carried unanimously, to adopt - %esolution No. 84 -50, with the additional condition that the parcel map shall be conditioned to require a barrier design at the south property boundary, east the eas to west on parcel 2, that is aesthetically compatible with both residences and the existing facility, and landscaping be improved to the point where it is an adequate barrier and will provide light and sound buffering to existing residences to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. ! * i i i Planning Commission Minutes -12- June 13, 1984 acres into 3 pax on Utica Avenue 351 -21. Commissioner McNiel Possible conflict of Senior Civil Engineer, Chairman Stout opened the public !rearing. - A division of 4.1 Subarea 7), located i Avenue - APN 208- staff report. Mr. James Barton, 8409 Utica Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, explained the office building and indicated the conditions were acceptable. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Hempel, carried, to adopt 3esolution No. 84 -51, approving Parcel Map 8569 and issuing a Negative Declaration. Commissioner McNiel returned to the table. The Planning Commission recessed. The Planning Commission reconvened. 19TH STRMT CORRIDOR STUDY - ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDME- TS City Planner, Rick Gomez- reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Barker stated following up on item No. 12, Land Use Study on 19th Street Corridor, and recognizing the tidiness of the proposal, he asked that staff expand the study area and bring back a report. The area is to include that along Highland and above. identified primarily to Haver_ and to extension of Milliken and conta.in Neighborhood Commercial, Medium and an Medium High as far as site specific, Mr. Gomez stated that staff considerations, an analysis and for consideration. relative to the land use this to the June 27th meeting Chairman Stout stated that he understands the new require=ents and likes the language; however, at the time the Gcmmittee was studying this they discussed situations :.'here they might not wish to give approval to a specific project due to the new conditio:,s oeing inadequate to bring it into conformance and be enforceable. Planning Commission Minutes Mr. Gomez replied that his understanding is that it would not be Within the City's authority to place additional conditions on a project. The Commission would have to denv it. Chairman Stout was concerned about projects that had minor changes that might have to be denied and thus have to pay a new filing fee for very little work involved. Mr. Gomez explained the costs involved in filing due to notifications and the staff work involved and indicated that Chairman Stout is asking for an expanded program that would not take into consideration those costs. He indicated that in any expanded program, these costs must be absorbed. Chairman Stout asked if there was any ;ray to isolate the notification fee and cover just the cost of that. Mr. Gomez indicated that staff would have to analyze that. Commissioner Rempel stated that there would be additional costs inasmuch as staff would have to go over the entire app.?cation. Chairman Stout stated that this would not be the case if there were only a minor change. Further, that they are doing it new and there is no charge for it. Commissioner Barker stated that until the recer_t City Attorney's opinion, the Commission would add minor modifications to previously approved projects when they came before the Commission for time extensions. Now the Commission is being told that they cannot impose these modifications such as the addition of a community trail because they are not enforceable and if the conditions are being changed they are being changed without legal notifications. He stated it is silly to have an applicant go through the total cost when there is just a minor upgrade involved. Commissioner Re=pel stated that if this has to go back through Design Review all that staff work will have to be done and this is an additional cost and should be charged. Mr. Gomez indicated that this can be left as it is and reviewed on a case by case basis because he doesn't think it is the intent of the Commission to provide a subsidy to some developers and have others pay the fees. Chairman Stout stated that was not the intent of the language that he proposed. Mr. Gomez stated that what this comes down to is a policy change and staff will write one up and bring it back for review by the Commission. Mr. Hopson stated that if there is concern by the Commission, staff can prepare a recommendation to the City Council relative to the fee structu;e that where differences are minor there be some adjustment to the fees. Planning Commission Minutes -14- June 13, 1984 Mr. Gomez suggested that this might include i.:ze costs of public hearing, Publications and notifications, 3e indicated tat he is trying to assist the Commission in isolating what the =in or costs might be. Commissioner Hempel stated that he has some difficulty in saying it is just a simple, little change and he cited an example of a project that is controversial. He asked if the fact that it is brought back will make the project less controversial. Mr. Gomez stated that staff will review the Commission's concerns and bring back a recommendation. Commissioner Hempel commented on the expense of the City putting up a large sign for notification of a project rach time. He felt that the City should have a specification that everyone should follow or alternatively, have many signs built with the finishing lettering to be applied by the developer. He felt that each applicant should be responsible fo, their own sign according to the specifications furnished to them. Mr. Gomez explained some of the problems that could occur if each applicant is responsible for their own sign. Commissioner Barker asked if the contractor would monitor the maintenance of the sign. Commissioner Hempel commented that the cost to the City would be more than the cost to the developer for the sign. Commissioner McNiel agreed with Commissioner Hempel on what the uitim^,te cost Of the sign will be. He felt that the specifications could be written in such a way that it would ensure compliance and uniformity. Commissioner Barker stated that he would like to have the developer build the sign but was concerned with who would monitor it. Mr. Gomez replied that the City would have better control if they have the sign built and monitor it. Commissioner Hempel stated that conformance should be relatively a simple matter because the staff has the authority to withhold approval of applications until they are complete. It was the consensus of the Commission that there was agreement with staff's recommendations on the study and that the sign portion be brought back after further study. Per. Jim Hand, Kingston Street resident, ;ranted to be sure that the 19th Street Cotridor will be expanded and brought back to the Commission at their June 27th meeting. Planning Commission Minutes -15- June 13, 1984 J. LOW - MEDIUM PESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Associate Planner, Dan Coleman, reviewed the staff report. Chairman. Stout stated that his personal preference is Option No. 3. Commissioner Barker stated that he has seen some colossal failures lately in the 6 -8 du /ac range because it does not work. He indicated tht they are gall to wall cement even with the skewed lot lines and the third option is the most logical. The Planning Commission concurred that the third option is their choice. Mr. Larry Bliss, developer, asked that the Commission leave open the option for 6 -8 because of some new housing types that are currently appearing in the San Clemente area. He indicated that the building community would like to see them here as we,". Mr. Coleman stated the Commission's packet, specifically Exhibit G, is some example of what It% Bliss is talking about and if the Commission makes certain decisions, it will preclude some single family detached products. Chairman Stout stated that the six projects that he has seen that are similar are dismal failures as far as he is concerned. He indicated further, there is no way to legislate superior design. Mr. Bliss further explained tine new concept of design to the Commission relative to units in the 6 -8 unit category. Chairman Stout asked what kind of common open space it has and what the density is. Mr. Bliss explained this to Chairman Stout. Chairman Stout stated that if some types of regulations can be written that can allow that type of process and products, it screen Oat all of the other undesirable would be all right. Mr. Gomez replied that Mr. Stout might want staff to develop language or some type of review if Option three is the preference that would allow flexibility so that they can deal with designs like K & B, which was encouraging because it alowed itself to blend with the traditional values of single family detached. Chairman Stout stated that he personally did not like that design. Commissioner McNiel asked that Mr. Gomez develop such language. Chairman Stout and Commissioner Barker stated that staff can try. Planning Commission Minutes -16- June 13, 1984 The consensus of the Commission is to have staff provide additional language providing flexibility for superior design in conjunction with the combination of options one and two. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Bar;,cer, carried unanimously, to continue past the 11:00 P.M. deadline. ! I * i i K. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout asked that the Banyan crossing be added to the Alta Loma channel road. Mr. Hubbs replied that it can be added to the long -range program. Commissioner Rempel asked if traffic signals are scheduled on the basis of priority. He asked that a signal for Base Line at Beryl, and 19th Street at Sapphire be given a higher priority because of their need. Mr. Hubbs replied this list was extensively revised; howe;cr, because loth Street is a state highway, the state will determine e,-2a�rt it should be signalized. He indicated that the priority listings are done on an annual basis and the City receives matching funds. Further, that the City does have funds for Baseline and Hermosa this year. Commissioner McNiel asked about 9th and Vineyard. Paul Rougeau explained how the signal was acquired at this location and how the state prioritizes the need for signals. He indicated that priorities can be changed based on the number of accidents and increased traffic. Commissioner Rempel felt that iteL No. 10 in the traffic signal priority Ust be moved up to the No. 5 position. Commissioner Rempel stated that the Base Line and Hermosa signal is not a critical traffic spot. Mr. Rougeau replied that staff can make another request to the state to reschedule these signals. Commissioner Rempel stated in the area of beautification, Archibald Avenue between 6th and 7th Street should be added to the list. He indicated this would not be costly but should be listed. Commissioner Barker stated that if the City can do it, he would be in agreement with Commissioner Rempel. Planning Commission Minutes -17- June 13, 1984 Mr. Hubbs replied that this would be a nominal cost. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution ho. 84 -52, recommending approval of she Capital Improvements Program to the City Council. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by McNiel, carried unanimously, to continue beyond the 11:00 p.m. deadline. L. RESOLUa ON ESTABLISING PLANNING COMMISSION POLICY ON STREET STANDARDS City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Barker stated that a '_ot of time had been spent during tae Development Code hearings regarding street standards ar_d the fact that there should be no distinction between those of private and public streets; however, it does not appear in the Low Medium development standards or in the discussion on street standards. Mr. Hubbs replied that it would be appropriate in the Development Code. There was brief discussion on the applicability of standards to the Low- Medium density areas. Mr. Rougeau stated that the Commission was considering the gated communities in the 4 or 2 per unit category. Commissioner Barker stated that the private roads were also being used in the 6 -3 unit per acre categories. Mr. Rougeau replied that is correct as they were using private roads to gain more density. Mr. Hubbs stated that referred to a section in the Development Code that made a distinction on setbacks on public and private streets. Commissioner Barker asked if that has been - emoved. Mr. Hubbs replied that would be a part of the previous item. Mr. Don Sing, consulting engineer, asked if setbacks from the curb have been established. Further, the development community would not have problems with adhering to City standards. However, from the point of view of the person designing the streets, once rights -of -way have been established, it would restrict innovation in design. Planning Commission Minutes _18- June 13: 1984 Mr. King stated that if there are things that the City does not wart, this should be set down in the standards as staff has very good graphics and they can state that this will not be aproved. He indicated that this would eliminate developers coming in with things that the City does not like and would curb repeats. Chairman Stout stated that design is one of the issues but there is another consideration and that is one of private streets. He indicated that a year down the read they might fall apart and because the subdivision is one of low density, they can't be repaired because of the costs involved. M. King stated that in lieu of established rights-of-way even for a private street, if it is going to be an air rights condominium, for example, and the front yard is desired, he requested that the Commission establish the setbacks for the frcnt yard without hampering the design possibilities. Mr. Hubbs stated that policy direction the Commission provided the last time regarding setbacks is consistent with Mr. King's conments. He indicated that they just wanted to have a uniform place to start. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to approve the policy on street standards. ■ 9 i % ! ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adjourn. 11:30 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned. i 4 ■ ! i Respectfully submitted: Rick Gomez Deputy Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -19- June 13, 1984 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT .JA OL DATE: July 25, 1984 19" TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE"SMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -22 - BENTSEN (L"NNHAVEN APARTMENTS - A review of the enviro- mental assessment for a proposed master plan for °i6 '.partment units located on approximately 58.3 acres on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Haven Avenue in the Medium -High Development District - APN 202 - 271 -59, 69. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested- Environmental determination, of the Initial tuay. B. Purpose: Environmental determination for the development of a 924 apartment unit Master Plan. C. Location: North side of Highland Avenue, 500 feet east of Haven Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 58.27 acres, gross; 45.42 acres, net. E. Project Density: 15.85 du /ac, gross; 20.37 du /ac, net. F. Existti�i____�� Land Use and Zoning: Vacant parcel, zoned Medium High identia . G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant parcel, zoned Low Medium Residential. Northwest - Single family residential, zoned Low Medium Residential. South - Proposed Foothill Freeway corridor; single family residential, zoned Low and Low Medium Residential. East - Vacant parcel, zoned Medium Residential. West - Vacant parcel, zoned Neighborhood Commercial. H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium High Residential, (Master Plan required), 14-24 du /ac. North - Low Medium Residential, (4-8 du /ac). 11 /Tc-3? cam. PLANNING Envir COMMISSION STAFF REPORT onmental Assessment and DR 84 -22 - Bentson July 25, 1984 Page 2 South - Low and Low Medium um Residential, (2 -4 and 4 -8 East - Medium Residential (4-i4 du /ac). Neighborhood Commercial. 1• Site Character ; st - Lynrhaven project site As is illustrated to Exhibit "Ali exception of various c'ucai predominan* the site in YPtus windrows- which vacant the wit undeveloped nwithsnoweSt fashion. Presently, y, the se the aosite contains a variety of °r existing improvements to is nsi "ing Of coastal sage scrub varidet�esus Plant The pproximateiy an gp r materia ;s 9 ade, north to south, the site slopes at J. Protect 8escripticn Master Plan' As illustrated comllexnonii6proPosing the de development of plan "A" P 85 acres of 1 Exhibit the District, and in the a 924 unit apartment The complex will Medium High Residential approximately 300 units eac h. consist of three and three - bedrooms contained Units will consist of Phases of clusters. Total o n one- one -, two_ the Pen space consists of ,8.84 acres three -story been P providers via Lemon Avenue. Four access driveways which lead Access have to System. an interior Y have loop circulation PhasE 1_ Phase with overall 1 consists of a total Q; Usable density of 20.58 dwell�n 316 dwelling have been space equates to 6,95 g units per acres three-bedroom units located n acres and 620 parkin e' 9s will consist of one-, sI and II• ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: within one to three -story two ' and The following Y units. esigned to elaborate upon the g Environmental Anal listed on the Initial Environmee P tentia] Analysis is includes a descri Stud environmental impacts Potential description of the Y. Part II, The Pacts environmental in environmental sett, analysts mitigation measures 'Pacts; includes 9: identifies which may be a r ' along with to additional PPl3cant's proposed Commission RP opriate as identified mitigation should b will have to determine by Staff, measures e issued, or whether whether a Negative Declaratioon be required, for the proposed an E °Vjronmental I P posed project, mpact Report should PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - Bentson Environmental Assessment and OR &4-22 July 25, 1984 Page 3 A. Gt_oloso'ls within There are two potential sources of future ct veu Cucamonga eand Red the City, those being the potentially The plquist- Priolo GeologZOneszabd Hill faults, (Exhibit "B "•) active fault cones Act of 1973 requires that andsprecentlytu�y established around potentially areas. The protect site lies outside of both these special study zonePes ro ect site area well id drained. and rapidly Soils within the haracterized by deep, Soboba variety traints related to soil Development cons permeable soils. ears minimal. characteristics app The topography of the site, Exhibit " is characterized by a lt d in a north /south relatively flat geologic P late tilte direction. The drop in elevation acrossngh ! average 3s� pee of is 69 feet from north to south, p aproximately 6p• Isd_Ct 7.5 magnitude event is possible along o Unavoidable adverse impacts related to seismic active Y• Potential for a 6.5 - the Cucamonga and Red Hill facalts. o Increased on -site erosion due tsi project grading, cuts, and fills. Pro osed Miti ation Measures Code Seismic o Strict adherence to she Unifon.. Building Standards. grading standards. the re uirements of the City of Rancho o Strict adherence Cucamonga Additional Mite ation Measures o Provide an eresion and dust control Plan- shall me site shall be graded in accordance with the City grading standards as they relate to the following R strict slope to 8 feet in vertical height, Per City _ e standards. PLANNING COMMISSION STUF REPORT Environmental assessment and DR 84 -22 - Bentson July 25, 1984 Page 4 - Encourage 3:1 slopes to be used exclusively. - The site should be designed to accommodate grading by providing a series of steps. - Contour grading principles should be utilized providing natural appearing slopes. o Retaining wall should be provided to reduce slope impact. B. Hydrology Setting: As illustrated in Exhibit "D ", the project site will receive hydrologic flows from as far north as the Chaffey College campus. The applicant has provided two storm drain alternatives (Exhibit "E") designed to accommodate drainage generated by a 25 year storm. The first alternative advocates providing a drainage pipe contiguous to the southerly property line, which would gather stormwater runoff and convey it to the south under Highland Avenue to the Deer Creek channel. The second alternative advocates providing a drainage pipe contiguous to the southerly property line, but conveying stormwater runoff eastward, along Highland Avenue, to the Deer Creek channel. The project site does not fall within a 100 -year flood plain, which is that area of land subject to flood hazards from a storm whose intensity occurs on the average of once every 100 years (Exhibit Impacts o Increased residential development could accentuate tho City's flooding problem by decreasing the amount of permeable ground surface and increasing the amount of water runoff. o Increased erosion due to on-site excavation, site clearance, utility trenching, etc. Proposed Mitigation Measures o The applicant has proposed two drainage system alternatives to accommodate on -site flows, and drainage generated off - site to the north. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and DR 84 -22 - Bentson ,luly 25, 1984 Page 5 Additional Mitigation Measures o Provide additional open, space designed to accommodate water percolation. o Provide an erosion control plan designed to mitigate on- site construction erosion. O Provide temporary on -Site Silt:, ion basins designed to control erosion. C. 3i ota Setting: The project site is located within the coasta, Sage Scruh Association characterized by perennial grasses and native plant materials. According to the General Plan Environmental Impact Report, development east of Haven Avenue, and north of Highland Avenue (project site) should be sensitive to the site. Builders are required to ensure that grading and construction practices minimize land alterations and removal of native vegetation. The Environmental Impact Report also encourages preservation of existing Eucalyptus windrows (which occur on the site) whenever possible. Currently no wildlife or plant species found within the Rancho Cucamonga area is on, or officially proposed, for addition to the Department of Interior's Endangered Species list. Impacts o Loss of native plant materials. o Elimination of habitat (cover, feeding areas, open space) for sinall mammals such as rabbits and numerous birds that occupy the coastal scrub association, forcing, migration. Proposed Mitigation Measures o Windrow preservation, wherever possible. Additiona .iti ation Measures o Provide windrow preservation plan. o Use native, indigenous plant materials wherever possible. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and DR 84 -22 - Bentson July 25, 1984 Page 6 D. Traffic /Circulation Setting: The project site currently abuts Highland Avenue, which is a major east -west arterial. In the future, however, the proposed Foothill Freeway will traverse the southerly edge of the project site, separating Highland Avenue from the project site. Primary access to the site will be provided by Lemon Avenue which will extend to the east with each phase of development, and then veer south ander the proposea - oothill Freeway to ultimately connect to Highland Avenue, west of the Deer Creek channel (Exhibit G). Lemon Avenue is currently a collector street. The applicant proposes that Lemon Avenue become a secondary highway with an 80 foot right -of -way. In addition, the applicant is proposing the inclusion of a left turn lane and traffic signal at Lemon and Haven Avenues (Exhibit H). The applicant has projected average daily traffic generated from the Lynnhaven development to be 5,710 average daily trips, with projected average daily trips for Lynnhaven, and the surrounding area of 15,910. Impacts o Increased traffic on Lemon Avenue east of Haven. (Increased vehicle trips per day of up to 5,601 from the Lynnhaven project.) Proposed Mitigation Measures o Lemon Avenue to become a Secondary Highway designed to accommodate the increased traffic (80 ft. row, 64 ft. curb - to- curb). o Installation of a traffic signal at Haven and Highland Avenues. o Installation of a left turn only lane, an optional left turn /through lane, and a right turn only lane at Haven and Lemon Avenues. Additional Mitigation Measures o Provide the Lemon Avenue easterly loop (to Highland Avenue) with the first project phase. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and DR 84 -22 - Bentson July Page 7 E. Noise Sett�n llmaacts As is evident, the proposed Lynnhaven will S ut the posed Foothill Freeway; a noise source which will create the most significant change in thefUto� a environment contours the City. As depicted on Exhibit "i ", adjacent to the Foothill Freeway will reach a level of 65 Ldn. According to the General Plan Environmental Impact Report, it was assumed that noise mitigation (beducingathe would be included in the design of the freeway, noise ieincl by 10 dBA below what would occur without mitigation. However, even with the IO dBA of attenuation, noise levels will increase at dwellings backing e v the freeway corridor by as much as i0 dBA, raising the average (Ldn) noise level ]Co bozwnaie7y anddoublang in loudnessn)reaAs is perceived as approximately Use Compatibility for illustrated in Exhibit "3 "+ multi - family residential Community Noise beEexposed comfortably to approximately 60 developments may Ldn; noise levels between 60 -70 Ldn require new construction or noiseo� eduction after a detailed and analysis undertaken needed noise insulation features included in e design. if leYels between 70 -75 Ldn are potentially u in Ile. Ldn noise construction or development doe proceed of the noise reduction contours, a detailed analysis requirements tsthesdesign. ad uu`doer reas must besshaeldedfeatures Proposed MitiaationsurCs o Require an acoustical analysis stow nter how or)ncanebetmet for of 65 CNEL (exierior) and 45 NEL rt dwellings located within freeway corridor. eial streets, and 400 feet of the proposed o Use of glazing and wall materials to reduce noise (dBA)• o Buffer the interior of the development by carports and three -story buildings. o Reduce mconstiuclion hours between 6:00 and 8:00 p•m- Additional Miti ation Measures 0 o ads tionan9acoutsticproan ts�forhasubsequent�rPlanning Commission approval. The analysis shall include: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and DR 84 -22 - Bentson July 25, 1984 Page 8 - A detailed future noise contour map of the site, illustrating noise contours generated by Lemon Avenue and the Foothill Freeway. - ,n:- :ngs shall be located outside the 60 Ldn future noise contours. Outdoor areas shall be shielded from iotentially unacceptable noise levels. A 60 Ldn noise level shall be acceptable for exterior noise. - Providing berming and intensified landscaping adjacent to the Foothill Freeway corridor and Lemon Avenue. - incr:asing the distance between noise source and the prolosed buildings. - Pla :ing non -noise sensitive land uses, such as parking lot, between noise sources and dwellings. - Usirq non -noise sensitive structures such as carports to shield noise- sensitive areas. - Orienting buildings to shield outdoor spaces from noise sources. - Placing noise sensitive spaces (bedrooms) away from major noise sources. - Providing noise barriers or walls between noise sources and dwellings. - Providing construction methods such as sealed windows, thicker windows, double glazing, solid core doors, wall modifications, etc., to reduce interior noise. F. Services Utilities: Utilities will be provided to the project site by the Southern California Gas Company, General Telephone, the Chino Basin Municipal Water District, and the Cucamonga County Water District. Impacts• None. Police /Fire: Fire service is provided by the Foothill Fire District. Response times to the site are 5 minutes for Station No. 1, 9 minutes for Station No. 2, and 8 minutes for Station No. 3. Police facilities are provided by the County Sheriff's Department. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT BA_22 _ gentson Environmental '•ssessment and DR July 25, Page 9 Imoys_ to afire hazard area. An will occur annually due to the o The project is located adjacent additional 122 calls ent Lynnhaven developm The proposed project will add an additional 329 calls o annually for police responses. Proposed Miti ation Measura= Fire resistant building design- 0 due to site clearance. o Removal of vegetative fuel v o Plant fire retardant plant materials. o Adequate fire hydrant spacing, wzter flows, etc. o Cash contribution towards the Fire District's fire protection fund for new fire stations. Additional Mit, ation Measures to determine the need for Further information is necessary ° olive personnel. additiona" fire and p Joint Education provide District public education for The Alta Loma School Cistrict and the Chaf ey v o— n h School District :his section of the co�nun;ty• Imv�s total of IA5 students to be �,e project w the Altar Loma and Chaffey School Districts. ° absorbed into P ro osed Mitigation Measures s will be "levied on each apartment unit- 0 Smoot fee G. LANJSE lam, Exhibit "A ", the en *_ is divided into three Pages of Settin As illustrated on the. site P date Lynnhaven development phase is designed to accomverall approximately 15 acres. Each P acres of open space. units approximately 300 units and 6 uates Lo 20.58 dwelling for the entire project eq ted t° transition pees acre. "Owever, the aPPlicant has attemp PLANNING CO14MISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and DR 34 -22 - 8entson July 25, 1984 Page 10 the density from lower density, 6.98 du /ac adjacent to Lemon Avenue, to 24 du /ac adjacent Y` the Foothiil Freeway corridor (Exhibit "K "). According to the applicant, each phase will be distinguished from the other by different product types (floor plans and elevations), in addition to varia±un in architectural theme, unit design, materials and siting. Each of the three phases will be separated into two distinct sites by a circulation spine which traverses the site in an east /west fashion. The northermost portion of the site will contain single story structures adjacent to Lemon Avenue, with lower density and larger oriented units. The southerly areas on the site are designed primariiy with density levels of between 17 -31 dwelling units per acre (Exhibit "K "). Impacts o Neighborhood compatibility with existing and future single family structures. located north of the project site. Increased traffic generation on Lemon Avenue. Proposed Mitigation ;,easures o Transition of density away from Lemon Avenue (7 du /ac adjacent to Lemon Avenue). o Single story units adjacent to Lemon Avenue. Additional Mitigatio Measures o The Planning Commission may request various Master Plan alternatives designed to provide a greater transition of density; greater distinction of product types; inclusion of additional open space; alternative site configurations, etc. III. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ALTERNATIVES The Planning Commission needs to determine the appropriateness of (1) issuing a Neaati-je Declaration, or (2) requiring a focused Environmental Impact Report. Alternative 1:. Wegative Declaration: Alternative 1 describes the issuance o a Negative Dec oration only if the Commission agrees is is complete and that the that the initial environmental analys mitigation measures proposed (which will become conditions of PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and DR 84 -22 - Bentson July 25, 1984 Dave 11 project approval) adequately address and mitigate all environmental impacts. If this alternative is chosen, the Planning Commission shall direct staff to prepare the necessary environmental documentation for Planning Commission consideration prior to project approval. Alternative 2: Environmental impact Report: Alternative 2 descrl es t e requirement or an Envlronmenta Impact Report. If the Commission determines that the environmental assessment of t�;c Initial Study has not fully addressed the issues and that furthe•:, environmental information is needed prior to project review, then an Environmental Impact Report snu:ld be required and shall include and identify various project alternatives, growth inducements, and cumulative impacts, as well as additional analysis in those areas identified by the Planning Commission. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for environmental review in The Daily Report newspaper. In addition, persons living within 500 feet of tte project site have been notified by mail. In addition, the Deer Creek Homeowner's Association and members of the 19th Street Corridor group haze also been notified. submitted, ck :FD:ns Attachments i t`? ti r P CI OF RANCHO CUCAVIONGA PI UNNING DIVISION -- - rrFM: -- . �_ E-XmBrr- SCALE:_ CI'TYY OF RANCHO CUCAIN /IO \•GA RLAIVNMC DIVISION Fejsme V -3 GEOiECHNICAL HAZARDS or S"Etsuumm era zxmsSra smm 14=I Q CgXX o WLURE sElsulIC NnzAFW: ��ryr sn ES zow LS�'I=C ZC*& cwu MIAMI- I TE:%1= Tl-lu: %-2,p by ala s EXHIBIT: �_ SCALE= I I, IICI, u z: 13' �_ Qz�!' u m CITY Or ITEM: RANCHO C;CAT10L'CA TITLE: PLANNING UNISON EXii'.Brr- SCALE- Im NORTH I !L I :'TRIBUTARY AREA M Gil 44 77fa -�2 43 1 •_� , 2142 AC.: I '•.+ • \\ rel I Zt IN 1 I 3 C. :. ' CJ Ac.1 REq aJ� r.2 m $1 --C�' -- -fit.-- D _ It779 ' 1 , 1 Q I6 1 fl�li[liilllll ItiLi11BB Illllillll111111 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN-IO \TGA PLAT NI C DiV'_SM ITE:x I: TITLE; EXHIBrr.. -�- SCALE N UR I H - %L Q l.f vL <, If.ti� 44<tAC Ixa k Wj la" iG➢ CCT ERE -— - _ STME'T �., 1.74YJl Zs IEtiG) f :ATE „� ITE:x I: TITLE; EXHIBrr.. -�- SCALE N UR I H 2 w Z M I �I z�, I o � � OF PLANNING DIVISION o " , I v e 6d - i Ca i 7 lilt) /a { EXk�I[3Ti'= �o 0 OZ v� SCALE- t ae Z a J 6 c 1555V NORM {t . o i l 1 1 l� I��I J f �• I � �I ' \` f 1J r e � 3S ar r e 0 I�� E 34 OF PLANNING DIVISION o " , I v e 6d - i Ca i 7 lilt) /a { EXk�I[3Ti'= �o 0 OZ v� SCALE- t ae Z a J 6 c 1555V NORM r E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I'I.ANNI U DIVISKYN NURP i ITEM: TITLE= l -- 2�¢�V' L EXHIBIT -t_ SCALE- W�o..�.e. CITE' OF RANCHO CUCA MOIGA PLANNING DRISKIN 1iLM: EXHIBIT: -- C=- SCALE: r� WORTH 7 �J CITY OF RI-CHO CUCATIVIONGA, PTANNII!'G Dl'%r N FUTURE NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOURS -Lan ME MC ,- NOISE CONTOUR FOOTHILL �r CONTOURS ITEM: 1 XHI3dT =_ SG1i.£-- INTERPRETATION Q NORMALLY ACCEPTABLE it;ed lard use is satisfactory, bated upon the asu- 1ption that w+Y builCin,P inwlved are of normal convention: construction:, without any - -teciol noise insuictl OD fMUirMIM$ 11:.Y1i CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE New construction cr oevelopment slwuld be u derloken only d.'!er o detailed analysis of the raise reduction requirements is made and needed noire insulation fao- lures ir.Liuded in the design. Canventiancl conatruc- lion, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systema or air cond :riming will normally suffitt. Out. door environment will seem noisy. POTENTIALLY UNACCEPTABLE New construction dde .'OPmem should generally be discouraged. If new construction or develop.^lent doe. Proceed. a detailed mclyr.is of tha noise reduction recpiremmts must be made and needed mice irsulo- tion features included in the design Outdoor rteas must be shielded. 1JORMALLY UNACCEPTABLE New eanstrJCtion or develotment should gene iy not be U dertokm Construction costs to make the indoor envirOntnent acceptable would be prohibitive and the Figure V -9 outdoor environment would not be usrblea LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE ENVIRONMENTS s CITY OF rfB1: RAINCHO CUCAIMUNTGA My PLAri�N UNC IxVisIGN EX-HiBrr- S CWMLN h NUKE LYKKI'RE L.tn iSCiaTEWRY LM 04 CNLL, ft SS 10 65 p 73 40 NN:vl N :1�1 LOW 0(N51TY I \�NG1li.wILV DerLER. SR,eaL nnrts _ RL51D1 NI4L- LICLTI f6tiLLY TR5N511N1 LOM..INC - MALL+ M111,11 1 V I URR6RI^L I RLHE n6]r1T.tls. %I RVIGs NLNSKC .owes A %DITORIUNS COKC4T I uul\ ! I 9 RLN.. OLTaOpa CT47 YECTIIDR $fp4]S rL +YCanuwos . w(K.wWa,10OD r.lai I L:4L IUUNt[S. 41DING ti ai Lt w41LR RLCRUT WN. CLMLltg,a n• r ICE 4UUaINCy. 4USINL55 L eww{ vil'li..RD raorEaroNu rvaL'STRINL, 616NUr4TU41na UTILni(t, •G4KUITDRE I INTERPRETATION Q NORMALLY ACCEPTABLE it;ed lard use is satisfactory, bated upon the asu- 1ption that w+Y builCin,P inwlved are of normal convention: construction:, without any - -teciol noise insuictl OD fMUirMIM$ 11:.Y1i CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE New construction cr oevelopment slwuld be u derloken only d.'!er o detailed analysis of the raise reduction requirements is made and needed noire insulation fao- lures ir.Liuded in the design. Canventiancl conatruc- lion, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systema or air cond :riming will normally suffitt. Out. door environment will seem noisy. POTENTIALLY UNACCEPTABLE New construction dde .'OPmem should generally be discouraged. If new construction or develop.^lent doe. Proceed. a detailed mclyr.is of tha noise reduction recpiremmts must be made and needed mice irsulo- tion features included in the design Outdoor rteas must be shielded. 1JORMALLY UNACCEPTABLE New eanstrJCtion or develotment should gene iy not be U dertokm Construction costs to make the indoor envirOntnent acceptable would be prohibitive and the Figure V -9 outdoor environment would not be usrblea LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE ENVIRONMENTS s CITY OF rfB1: RAINCHO CUCAIMUNTGA My PLAri�N UNC IxVisIGN EX-HiBrr- S THIS DENSITY TRANSITION SHOWN FOR PHASE ONE. IT IS "TYPICAL FOR ALL PHASES this- area to the north 's zoned this 4 to 8 Units per acre center of drive center of drive center of open space spine LEMON AVENUE 2.25 acres net / 16 units: 7.11 units per acre net 2.80 acres gross / 16 Units: 5.71 enits per acre gross 2.84 acres / 40 Units 14.0 Units per acre net 4.86 acres net / 90 Units: 18.51 Units per acre net 11 ,5_40 acres net / 170 Units 31.48 Units per acre net 822 acres gross / 170 Units: 20.68 Units per acre gross OTAL SITE 15.35 acre 15.72 acres ±� �3j�'- - .mac- j.- �..ai. r �•r -. -- -_�- _r -.. -.- r.� _���- �� _� y''•- _ - jG:•,: CI'T'Y OF Bt. iNCHO CUCATMONNGA PLANNLN�G DIvom MINI: TnU: S>a n ,\ t- , A ,n ExHip,rr: L- scAL—P: MISS OEVE'?,OPMENT RE`7IEW Ly,.- SUAVEN PROJECT COMMENTS RANCHO CUCAMON6 SHERI_F'S STATION By DEPUTY a.7 'SC HLABACH 989 -6611 TRAFFIC: There will be an increased The ur_it will be receiving will be expected to enforce Also the increased flow of increase the enforcement load workload on the Traffic Unit. calls on traffic collisions ec d traffic laws within the will traffic outside the project along �.;ith more accidents. CRI`INAL ACTIVITY the influx of many new families the crime rate will With It is recommended that proper security increase with it. locks d e ins s lied on one t Inc dboltsdoand freeorf bowing guards installed. Windows must not be removable have portion of cvlinde_ position. The sliding glass doors must be on the inside in a closed and locked the windows and sliding tracks. good visibility Any child play areas rust bAnlocated o nitva swI mmn4 Pools must surrounding homes. from from homes and the street. b_ clea-lv visible LIG�G= gust have sufficient Any Any areas or community pool areas lighting during darkness. Sidewalks should have at least five -foot candles of lighting during darkness. Any parking lots should have five -foot candles o£ lighting during darkness. If a laundry room is proposed, it must have large windows I from the li hting inside and outside. and should be located to allow visibility street. It must have sufficient g Parks, pools, parking lots light sensitive switchers. Lighting in should have and laundry room areas j, ii I �i 'ii`' i1 i� f•�i� v Z • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM I DATE: TO: FROM: July 9, 1984 Tim BeedlP, Senior Planner Paul Rougeau_ Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment for Lynnhaven Project i lyi 1 The following are comments on the adequacy of the Environmental Assessment prepared by Donald King & Associates for the above project: TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION The trip generation rate used for project traffic is the minimum acceptable for analysis. City staff will inflate ti:e resultant traffic volumes for determination of project conditions, etc., so the calculations need not be repeated wi +h more desirable rates at this time. The analysis of traffic impacts on Lemon Avenue were done using only the project traffic. Traffic generated by the area between Lemon and Banyon and the area east of the project area should also be included and distributed appropriately. It is felt by City staff that neither the master plan cross section of Lemon nor the Haven /Lemon intersection will be adequate if the impact area mentioned above is developed at upper end densities. Impacts and mitigation should be assessed using a71 traffic to determine if provisions for upgrading these facilities should now be made. Temporary connections to Highland Avenue have been proposed for each phase as interim access. Such access points would be primary accesses because of the predominately southerly orientation of travel from the pro ect area. The elimination of this access by freeway construction and /or the realignment of Highland Avenue to the south could thus cause a consideable There a should he accesses. 1. 2. 3. H:'DROLOGY The hydrologic assessment appears adequate, subject to confirmation of quantities at later stages of planning. The general assumption of the provision of an adequate storm drain system should also be further supported in any planning documents for the project. PAR: j as Foofhi l Fire PROTECTION DISTRICT July 17, 1981: Mr. Frank Dreek=an, Assistant Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: The Lynn Haven Project Prz—,posed 936 units on Highland Avenue SUW: Conditions as set forth by the Foot'ill Fire District for approval of said project Dear Mr. Dreckman: In addition to the informtion and comments provided in of the Environmental Impact Report, the following condi apply. The paragraph on page 57 item 3.10b impact, 3rd corrected to read as follows: it has been determined Irl that this project will have significant '=pact and will 122 additional emergency responses annually. the initial study :ions shall also paragraph shall be the Fire District generate approximately L. B. I. Development, Inc. must negotiate with the Fire District a fair and equitable contribution toward the District's fire protection fuLd to mitigate damages. The standard fire district immct formula will be used to determine the degree of contribution proportionate to the need created. Correction number 2 appears on page 58, section 3.10c under mitigating measures paragraph number h. The figure 1,250 gallons per minute reeuirement shall be struck and corrected to read 2,000 gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch for 2 hours. On page 58, section 3.10c mitigating measures, under paragraP11 5, the sentence reads: These measures have not yet been implemented. This sentence shall be struck. New sentence shall read: Prior to recordation of -,.he first tract, the following shall be accomplished. It.,.m a, fire hydrant spacing and fire flow shad conform to district requirements. Item b, L. B. I. Development, Inc. shall contribute proportionately based upon project impact to the construction of a fire station and facilities and to the ongoing operational and manning reeds of said station. Item c, L. B. I. Development, Inc. shall contribute 6623 Amethyst St.. Rancho Cua=onm CA. 91701 Phogm ?14) 997 -2535 P.O. Box #35 R Cucamonga, CA 91701 r_• -./f 0 V ` v SUW: Conditions as set forth by the Foot'ill Fire District for approval of said project Dear Mr. Dreckman: In addition to the informtion and comments provided in of the Environmental Impact Report, the following condi apply. The paragraph on page 57 item 3.10b impact, 3rd corrected to read as follows: it has been determined Irl that this project will have significant '=pact and will 122 additional emergency responses annually. the initial study :ions shall also paragraph shall be the Fire District generate approximately L. B. I. Development, Inc. must negotiate with the Fire District a fair and equitable contribution toward the District's fire protection fuLd to mitigate damages. The standard fire district immct formula will be used to determine the degree of contribution proportionate to the need created. Correction number 2 appears on page 58, section 3.10c under mitigating measures paragraph number h. The figure 1,250 gallons per minute reeuirement shall be struck and corrected to read 2,000 gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch for 2 hours. On page 58, section 3.10c mitigating measures, under paragraP11 5, the sentence reads: These measures have not yet been implemented. This sentence shall be struck. New sentence shall read: Prior to recordation of -,.he first tract, the following shall be accomplished. It.,.m a, fire hydrant spacing and fire flow shad conform to district requirements. Item b, L. B. I. Development, Inc. shall contribute proportionately based upon project impact to the construction of a fire station and facilities and to the ongoing operational and manning reeds of said station. Item c, L. B. I. Development, Inc. shall contribute 6623 Amethyst St.. Rancho Cua=onm CA. 91701 Phogm ?14) 997 -2535 Mr. crank Dreckman, Assistant Planner July 17, 1984 Page 2 of proportionately oased upon project impact to the pnrcall- aspects of the apparatus p project and equipment to properly man said station. item d, relating to fire and life safety shall conform to local conditions and standards of the Fire District and the most recent adopted edtion of the Uniform Fire Code. L B. I. I3 In closing, we look forward to meeting vith representaties of . evelop- ment, Inc. and stand ready to assist in any way possible. rs Jim w. Bowman Develo ent Fire Marshal., COT=='ty pm cc: L. B. 1. Development, Inc. Mr. D.G. King, Associate Planners JB /=g E Ll N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 25, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -20 - GABRIC - The oeve opment of a 50,972 square foot in ustrial warehouse building on 2.64 acres of land in the General Industrial area (Subarea 11) located on the south side of 7th Street, east of Utica Avenue - APN 209 - 411 -07. I. PROJECT AN? SITE DESCRIPTION: A. fiction Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of a precise site plan and building design and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: To create a 50,972 square foot industrial warehouse C. Location: South side of 7th Street, east of Utica Avenue D. Parcel Size: 2.64 acres E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial (Subarea 11) F. Existing Land Use: Vacant parcel G. Surrounding Lard Use and Zoning: North - Light manufacturing building; zoned General Irdustrial South - Vacant parcel; zoned General Industrial East - Industrial warehouse; zoned General Industrial West - Vacant parcel; zoned General Industriai H. General Plan Desi Project Site - Ge North - General South - General East - General West - General nations: tern In us Industrial Industrial Industrial Industrial trial (Subarea 11) (Subarea 11) (Subarea 11) (Subarea 11) (Subarea 11) ITEM A 0 Development Review 84- 20 /Gabric July 25, 1984 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The project is located within a planned industrial park with all improvements including streets and utilities existing. The site slopes gently from north to south. Vegetation consists of inoigenoas plant materials. There are no structures located on the site. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. Staff completed the Environmental Checklist and found no signficant adverse environmental impacts related to the project. B. Impacts: Development of the project will increase the amount of water runoff from the property in addition to minimally increasing traffic generation. However, these increases are insignificant since the surrounding streets and drainage facilities will be provided to handle t;ie increases. V. RECOMMENDATION: 3ased upon site analysis and the Initial Study, this project will not cause signficant adverse impacts on the environment. if the Commission concurs, issuance of a Negative Veclaration for the project would be in order. tted, kG:Fb: jr Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Elevations Exhibit "B -1" - Elevations Exhibit "C" - Location Map Initial Study, Part I G_a S, E. L3 r TW` s t: qz sf4 _ U-1 J r 1 L} • 1 I u It 1 i ,c .mod I� -'"- I 8 1. i CQ _ 1 - CITY OF ITEn1:1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE- ► P Iz ti PLANTINING DlNrbq Ni EXHIBIT; SCALE- 0 -3 l � Ga ..1 tL It r utj J L] (! i r �ri CITY 01 RANCHO CUCAAI0 \GA PL.ANTI I\G DiVb--ON Q -q 12 V ;z L L `4l J U ti U< C �L C . 4� „_ ? i a _ 1 r�Z Jr L< Q� 7 Z 0 �(3 Eiji 1 L:J ij n� tS} NURT;3 'TES 1= 0 TITLE= EXHIMT- sckrE- } -T, 1 c i! 1 l � Ga ..1 tL It r utj J L] (! i r �ri CITY 01 RANCHO CUCAAI0 \GA PL.ANTI I\G DiVb--ON Q -q 12 V ;z L L `4l J U ti U< C �L C . 4� „_ ? i a _ 1 r�Z Jr L< Q� 7 Z 0 �(3 Eiji 1 L:J ij n� tS} NURT;3 'TES 1= 0 TITLE= EXHIMT- sckrE- 0 EAET i =__ =-� : 1c_. = / r ��._.�� ties c.L. •�. �: � —_. �, _- c�s c_- - - -- sue; y E -=-, 51 D= =LEVX- ICN CITY OF 'CHO � G x XIONGN PLANNING DiN iSION 0 -5 Fay. _ . - s.•.. -r IM M: :XHIBFi : —Fall— SC1Li:: N t �:r 'YJ .r FT •a, r.t5.. 1ak'`$M 1 fo s e� i � _ ter.. �•i. �...:, • .. tea'•. e .'� }�.': -• ? �`vz 4 _ : a,, C•=mei � ,fit, « .. x J,. jy•�r�•JC•' 7'. .: 5S»�f: =yi. i'�mr.x�+� -,w, Y.,� � � �L"rw! •.• - •��.t` -i''� C vN� .y � tii .a \ �n Y„q� .•]- r � •. r .+• ..," - y,� t! wV�,. "yr. 1 K . � h fy. '�. +. -: �N <'x `« ti .: �•` J�tMl .ri ?lP� •C y t.. f - :A- • E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET — To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projectz requiring cr_vironmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study - The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no r-igni- ficart environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will ne filed, 2) The project will have a sigrificant environmental impact and an Environmental impa _ Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Industrial Building for Ca. :lac Fairview (f�b 612!u) APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 2101 South Atlantic Souleva:d - Los Angele NA1AE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE Q;ONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Les Angeles, California (21 OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED Breck Jle - 2101 South Atlant OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) ucamonga. Parcels 5 & 7, P.M. No—.-n94 t or utica LIST CYPHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL; STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AvD THE AGENCY ISSUING S ? ?H PERMITS: Building Permit, Grading Permit, utilities, Fire .iepartment Q` I -1 P:'OJECT DESCRIPTION 4 - D£SCRIPTION OF PROJECT. One precasr concrete tilt -up industrial _ buildine ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Land = 2.54 acres Proposed Building: 50.97? s -f DESCRIBE THE EN`7IRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOCaRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The project is located within a Dlanned industrial Dark All Is the project part of a larguir project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although indiviAually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? 11 I -2 � �• 1 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO _ X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand For municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, f'_ammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required fcr this initial evaluation to t`he best of my ability, and that the facts, stat nts, and information presented are true and correct to tae best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before &n adegruate evaluation can be ^.ade by the Development Review Committee. D -.te 5/2 9!84 Signature Title Architect I -3 Q-q A El CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 20, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner 1977 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIE'wl 84 -22 - BENTSEN - A review of the environmental assessment for a proposed master play. for 936 apartment units located on approximately 58.3 acres on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Haven Avenue in the Medium -High Development District - APR 202 - 271 -59, 69. The staff report on the above - described project will he delivered to the Planning Commission on Monday, July 23. Additionally, a copy of the environmental document prepared by the applicant's consultant will be delivered under separate cover. RC /jr ITEM B E 11 Ci= OF RANCHO CUCATTVIONGA STAFF REPORT i - DAaF: July 1984 10: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATPVE "RA.CT 12365 - LEWIS - A request for approval of carport screening materi-a-I and modifications to conditions of approval for same. I. BACKGROUND: This project was approved by the Planning Commission On June 2 , 1984. During the review of the project, the Commission was concerned with the appearance and maintenance of the proposed lattice screening material used on the carports, see Exhibit "J". The lattice screening was proposed for those carports located in areas of public view adjacent to the perimeter streets, see Exhibit "E" Based upon aesthetic and maintenance concerns, the Commission conditioned the project to replace the lattice with a solid screening material that is durable any requires minimal maintenance. The applicant is requesting +.nat the Commission reconsider and approve the use of lattice screens. This project will be owned and maintained by Western Properties (Lewis Homes). Per the attached letter, their experience with the lattice material indicates that the carport design minimizes the possibility of damage by cars. The Design Review Comittee reviewed the carport elevations and photographs of other projects with lattice screens. The Committee recoTm -ands that the lattice material be approved as a more natural look3.q and appropriate screening material. II. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised for public hering in The az Re ort. There are no property owners, other than Lewis, within "0 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received eith" for or against this project. ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 12365 - Lewis July 25, 1984 Page 2 III. RECOMMENDATION: The Design Review Committee recommends approval of lattz port screens through modification cf Condition? 5 and 6 in the attached Resolution of Approval No. 84 -60 as follows: 5. A lattice screening material shall be provided on the end of carports nearest public streets. 6. Details for carports shall be included in the construction pians for review and approval by the City Planner. The lattice screens shall be properly maintained by the management company, including t`gw,ir and repainting as required. submitted, ck r'Ccas Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location ;dap Exhibit "E" - Approved Site Plan Exhibit "J" - Carport Elevations Resolution of Approval No. 84-60 E El E MAJOR GREENWA "' -<. SYSTEM ••••• MAJCRTRA.ILS I \� SCHOOLS i i 500 1000 1500 on � Seale in te ml a �1 M J; 1 I M _ a 1 NC M I -, - -- - - - -- op i M M M LM M i NC ` M rr / f i _Lm ' MH • f LM f/ ��\ \ p L PAH Lbf�- M I Lm LM OP RC OP H it �J� \ iVo- OP OP cc op 1�VI11 no CITY OF !l� - PL„NN,NLNG MrSION EXHIBIT- --jA-%—scr:_E- C 3 '1 �I t• � �, VtSSL 1DDD3fR1fS ?P t fr— '' ate• r. c .Amt LOT 7 :`Tip =�i � � -•rr�. �Q7 4�\ '�I~ � ._i-�. raMrAr LOS 8 8 E wr+. vtY. sns � j � Y -utK, tsn JLy--- .- JJ"`a• ��r S 1 1 tD6. TK � �lO0.l{•.( .Amt LOT 7 :`Tip =�i � � -•rr�. �Q7 4�\ '�I~ � ._i-�. raMrAr LOS 8 8 E � V N - RTH 11 CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA PLANINENG DIMS N `-- -- EXI- iiY3IT: SG1i.E: •"' C -q wr+. la •:y_w�w• _IIaa � V N - RTH 11 CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA PLANINENG DIMS N `-- -- EXI- iiY3IT: SG1i.E: •"' C -q U IE i P- L C Q J i t 1 !mss I Cx I ' I i c G L: I A r 9 -e3 , - a Imn c 7n .t C� � p i� 29 ,O v o 9 -e3 , - a Imn c 7n .t C� � p aa: n z' c3 �r ig- 17 irk C) a u H 0 r c CITY OF ITE:NI- . I ?���s� RANCHO CT- CA,NMUNCA, T;- u-. 4 PLANNING DIVMN EXHIBIT= SC-m-.&- 0--s C C RESOLUTION NO. 84 -60 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,. CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT .SAP NO. 12365 by Western Properties, atav_ Tract Map No. 12365, hereinafter "Map" submitted property PPlicar,�9 for the Y situated in the Cit Purpose of subdividing the real State of California, described of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, 270 apartments on 15 acres intos8alotsd�regulzrly oCZT to�Fl development of C07 for public hearing and action on June 27, 1984; and re the Planning WHEREAS, the City Planner has rece „ ended approval of the Map subject to ail conditions set forth in reports; and the Engineering and Planning Division's presented at the public Division'so read evidence presented at the public hearing, NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission m,.-';es the following findings in regard to Ten— t- a e Tract No. 12365 and the Map thereof; (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for ;hE type of development proposed; (d) The desigr, of the subdivision is not l ke7,. to cause substantial environmental damage a,;d avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is net likely to cause serious Public health problems; (f) the desian of the tentative tract will not con with any easement acquired by the publ flict ic at Property o record, for access th zrge, rough or use of the within the proposed subdivision. 13 (2-L �J L' J Resolution No. 84 -60 Page 2 (g) That this project will not the environment and a issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract attached hereto, is hereby approved sub; and the attached Standard Conditions: create adverse impacts on Negative Declaration is Map No. 12365, a copy of which is jest to all of the following conditions PLANNING DIVISION- 1. Open fencing, such as wrought iron or th,!lar steel, shall be provided between buildings adjacent to the r site. self- latching gate shall be provided to the as a connection 2. Applicant shall contact the school distri.t regarding the proper design and location of access to the school site. 3. Provide storage units throughout the project to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in the construction ;,fans. 4. 5. Provide a 3 -foot to 4 -foot high :tensely landscaped berm to screer. public_ streets. material (non - lattice) shall b2 end of carports nearest public etaining wall and parking areas from A solid screening provided on the streets. the 6. 7etails for carports shall be included in the construction plans for review ana app City Planner. Carport type °A" shall be provided with a solid screening material, instead of lattice, that is durable and requires minimal maintenance. 7. All trash enclosures shall be provided with a lattice overhead or similar shade structure to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 8. Whenever the regulations of the Terra Vista Community Plan differ from the standard conditions, the Community Plan regulations shall supersede those of the standard conditions. g. Two (2) enclosed tot lot facilities with play equipment shall be provided. Details and locations shall be included in to final landscape plans to the satisfaction of the City Planner. e —rl R I Resolution No. 84 -or Page 3 t E 10. Construct adjacent trail concurrently with the project, including landscaping and irrigation. 11. The recreation area indicated on Lot 7 shall be installed during Phase I construction. ENGINEERING DIVISION: 1. The a-�plicant shall be required to construct a second-?ry access road of a minimum 26 -foot wide A.C. pavement within 40 feet of dedicated right -of -way from Spruce Street to Haven Avenue at Church Street, including a bridge across Deer Creek, as shown on the drainage map, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The cost of the bridge shall be credited towards the system development fee for Terra Vista development. 2. All drive approaches are to be constructed to City Standard No. 306. 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form and /or join landscape and and lighting districts, or other maintenance entity acceptable to the City Engineer, shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved ir. the formation of the district or other vehicle shall be borne by the developer. Th is shall include maintenance of perimeter landscape parkways and trails. 4. The applicant shall be required to construct a portion of the master planned storm drain along Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive, as shown on the drainage map. 5. Concurrent with the required parkland dedication for Tract 12365, the developer shall dedicate any road frontage contiguous to the proposed park site, per the Park Implementation Plan. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF JUNE, 1984 PLANNING OMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C'IMMONGA Dennis L, S Chairman ATTEST- ' • JRi¢k G6 ez, Deputy Secretary C -2 Resolution No. 84 -60 .{ Page 4 i I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of dune, I�84, by the following vote -to -wit: nvcc- rnrmaTC,;m,4ERS: REMPEL- CHITIEA. BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 11 C -9 N CJ O Z Y U CJ 0 i C oou q = V Anr L i dY.0 C W d C r O C at L y q Q 6 N b a'GJ G o 0 D 6 l C - O P E _ qc V v Pr = a C O •� v O q N � •.. V r � q � �C q r 0 � Y >`V C�� V _ b C n 4 F N V u a n > q Y (.v V C O O C^ V a ^ V q C L c C � C r 6 c >o� N O r VN O J C O ^� q O C V N c � r V d G 6G r CCJ•gj °qq N OCi c 6 E oti�d G O •J C • l V C C C d O y U _ O C r V L G C V O C C > m ✓ N n L C V - - N^N oNq 4 D pY•+ ^ n N O O q q O P C P q u n TVr °rN c�v oT t q 6 CL C N c`.°ss 6gnt° n Q N j O C2 O O u F 0 O O NI u 7 N c o J 6 G V t OJ s w x r 6 v V q G O V. 6 � N ° `o 0 c _ =In Q 9 c� C V � q V J L NV E L. z o M J O tO 6 2 F <V C = O L E � Vr.Jn t O d Y q L q p �Cq r e ` V ads _ a � M G W O °u e l Cq Q � 6 w� L V O r O V �n4 °v V L V v oL. v V M V O r c O C O O E V q n-' ar E e _ 6t P � C V C q L o °= Y 6� q y 4 O n r y � V �yg Y P� I =iCL O Vy q r L =1 OO.Oq qL_ O V O W J N +. uo d L q °No Ezt t bCq a - O t L L L a- O � O � _ O C qr r N > y q V• CP_ 6 V C _ n V QN6a o► O O C�- q � r r. `o r° C a ° - G C.� nc Z r O b� "N C� � C Q e C qV O 6q n'^ i °9 zr V V° n t a C b �J^ a u c L n O c N r La c c ° C - V b ? O - D j V d _ � 3 O sbu, b V C a u 0 L_ r f C r C q p c CCU_ L� - r C ct NC rim NN C` W' p own° oc 6J s ego 6a 1 be _ a>c C p ` � 9 V C^ mb ° V � q V � J C d L O V � ° ^C e Vi O MO L V .°p O O V O nr E E c N d 0 � °NGc O N E d c c E c c q J V u L o p F J O n� L '^ V M M rr L V C q 3_ Y � 7 � 7 DOV c L c"v u q iaN a O r n .°• 0 7 e > - V d 6v J E cL 6r L d •O O � E N _ q � . L` q� r _ G Y N C epi r O Z V d qC O� P C 4 V O Pi nu w w G O O q c L r 6 q O - V n= o � b a V L •' s � o L 6 r � o 00 ec 4 N � r p O ` C-1 O T C.. u C ° 4L V y L. ^ Y nr V C L J L o N J qv O r C ..uc by_ q 6 V a C�i V � L O p V i �N V q n L Py C C L L O . r� d y V � a Qa I a =° N`y qr^. Na aM � O r W� J C� ^ i — c qSc d = q V J r L d °G u ° - C C L E L O L C N q P q > �c N° 1 g < 6 V q NC q p C C L q N i A X-2 or °qE L C - L P V C > C V V y O Y V Cr P�o yC C J •Ji. q ^ N 4c °- "9Z no qL= _ P ^ G 9 c Q O O V 6� L n q > N NAG u ° 4 C i' O - N O _ O C V O C C J V u L o p F J O n� L '^ V M M rr L V C q 3_ Y � 7 � 7 DOV c L c"v u q iaN a O r n .°• 0 7 e > - V d 6v J E cL 6r L d •O O � E N _ q � . L` q� r _ G Y N C epi r O Z V d qC O� P C 4 V O Pi nu w w G O O q c L r 6 q O - V n= o � b a V L •' s � o L 6 r � o 00 ec 4 N � r p O ` C-1 O T C.. u C ° 4L V y L. ^ Y nr V C L J L o N J qv O r C ..uc by_ q 6 V a C�i V � L O p V i �N V q n L Py C C L L O . r� d y V � a Qa I a =° N`y qr^. Na aM � O r W� J C� ^ i — c qSc d = q V J r L d °G u ° - C C L E L O L C N q P q > �c N° 1 g < 6 V q NC q p C C L q N i A X-2 or °qE L C - L P V C > C V V y O Y V Cr P�o yC C J •Ji. q ^ N 4c °- "9Z no qL= _ P ^ G 9 c Q O O V 6� L n q > N NAG u ° 4 C i' O - N O V aCn CG °L gC•n00 �Cl°Tr>.i _G `V�1 V Cor OL Pi q � «CCG�� O •n6 rC0^ u 9 C • V G r G V✓ 9' a`�= n N 9 C g q C 4 G ^ G O C V— V ? '� ' O G .0.� E V— LM napi °pT _ V V ^ter tYiui ' � L ° 9J.•. V9 cr i C4y� Pr._ _OV OIC`Oq r_ CV Y m ` LLGd Ga•L4 'oc cr.`c v _ —r r:•'dc au o ^" Q- .rj ` c o9 i✓ °c. ^ °_ —E�; °rte S ° =C IvV VtL OyT —L q0 _C °aL 0_ 7U Tr rrV n0 cc�� b 9 E 0 _i q . L G •O. u W 72 s 3^ 9 c d o t2 0 Dv J c O O^ «^ r V d0C Z— L '^ .«.. •d. Spirt GPV9 Nr O 9 V u u° rQ V qo E vi_ ° «rrOCa n r�`•sn ° d '^- d'.NT.4 Q o oT-°. .°J_ Na �o uF6 °� erica =c c�ngarf °c`.q romod co.sn 'N . � L o — / u « r fj 9 q L.OJ 0 9 4 E l 8,2—= r N PPv L O V 9 O V pV _L_ TJN> r�J'.JGV G OfijM V G qq O L O� N �• P O`L T GTl« Lo y Nc N NC =- y q ___ C '• V O — r r F V-O V r 7 L O d_ C> C l r 6 « 4 0 C -J n N �i 6 —V <G•O S« fr �� «L e 1 �N 0 N m T r o i q d G 6 «^ i r£ r W�y 0 0 N d d •+ S 9 4 r' =i .••V _C NG Sr is ��V7 L u —�� � � F yYt) T^ N V C C� i .' V N i b= •O.. � VVC, > V r � _ V ^ L N ^c nF �c ,carrao er eq ��•u °cLG °n — ° c °L� qE ° e °in ._� ^� V •JMO G '. cpi eYO °GCE v w _ 72 i.. C r y j G u 2° CJ q PY � V ` r N F P r • e C C O V drD U VO j`rCj PC�r> iSG CqN � uLn rV Y •^ q r nV0 °rti ° O.9 q °C= 9° dNLOjV LC- LO = r �rC q O V Z N C• W° .-. g q r O w G 6 U r V ° r« O C C ` O j l G _ > «c LeV ycyPC�i C rr PfCj .r. =-COai S PpCC S• 9O` O « V « r G V C V L O C u N C l P u•, 2] cqc c c _o o °oe a ^q « +� iGO =•e o «Ln M Jlr rQ N99 ty OL rS CGL LC ��V JVr V.n 4�.T. Fi eM CL PO O C9 QQrtV 7 N. 4 C CCf = • O• N QL. LI ^r C9 P _ m D.• EN .v «` rv.0 Nv �_A .v y vc.r y 4 V_ L N•_ M Jc E, ._ qL ^ �' Q G O a T ^ t � 7✓ �{ NQ v ^4 =Or L O✓_ «nuT ^`� �C M ^V OL L� __ _ N M C_ ^ tc L •� C c > Q: V L D ✓ S ]1 ^J �^ P � r V N> q A ✓L_ V¢ Vy a, O D VD =00. A9 V EO L =N L-J 6C OrJ Cp iV r _JV ° LT✓ qVC k.r. �rnY dN � -Cd d4A ^ q G C C o l ✓' ✓ L C S NO�C7 V l N D P r i d A•r` Fu�M =`� O. L N � � A9 rV�N N G C ✓ q 60DY a J r d o ONO P6 CNi u• P4 LOC iV _ _•s OCC•CC �� `Cq�•a• O Cd L ^ JNq VGA -�LUC O.0 L= NNj —LC q 0 q✓ M •J V> _. C OY O C•••NOC rLq q CA 6�y £r Al CD O.tO rT qC PAN ✓0= r C PEE EO c Oy vD N ^yiL 'E —_ cL- Tn2 L<L c _ A ✓ EGy = ? N Tj i T C ✓^ n t N L O q^ O C r _N. n r V d •r y V q O O A C V �• J O ^OCC ONE aNW Arm Mr✓ N`0 =A CO VO >6C � =V r_S�N Vd dVU OP�C� °V nN JQr 4C _ <q ^00- 6u .-ar NL W P q G 9 A� v O ✓ •f d d C O D g L O � C= C P 6 D. O q N O ^ ^ • ^r D L d L WC r G O. q= N 9 N L d A d y V✓ M N O ` L tl a•L' � ° �da� V w.. AEJN � °= ° ac o a°.« No� jai r -'^'d z L ✓ L � C r E2— i �`z' c �t Yr A r. N O_ SVAPy pO rVL1> ^y �qyC 0A j O O• V Or° UQ' L D� CV q iTOC ^ Arr.OrO >LOL eL 4 G Q ~O_N Z �O`L O� �TOr N .7rOw YT qr EO L_ L •_ C d C V P� M L N A V ![ P O O =� Y U� w_ ✓ C N« !O g 9• P g O �� d p = v L C A C 4 S 9 � V i V E 1S °p D G N ^O. =Z- J� ✓d V ^C2 V^ V OV � 9 ^O V .o .i. « dcA -o g� b �v NN �� q' o✓N .L.. nq� 7Z ` ^' _ rt`� �6 °L� Pf0 f• �E Vd oo L c �_ 4 v•' do N Gov oo y r L D« O V z ° M ^_ G L O r G G � U^ L 6� 0_ � � �i-� o C O O L O S A C• C N L N •i x U ^ q 0 O� == � ✓ q y V r a P O ^� V O w '� C •'21 L O c C t = N d d u- N caq ✓° = O ` LT, °� N rL. __ 4r ^zee. i ^EJ�dS " co��oo MN -- .a..a. N ^ "oAia"c °v"„Q —u w w Nc.y.d �� °•' �a�e.^ia oN cn>e ec a.ed °.°.r L M= '• O r p nr. qNr� iii• o orL `db E N^ `_a. N« T o -Z2- ` � L A 6 � 6 J V V � V b r O L N f_ ✓ O � d d q= � d P E L O L L L O. ^_ tM tD 6N )NdV y r Qe CMCy O� QMOe yYNO ntNEN qN Qa `� N � • Jl� 1 ' �1 1 l m -mo.c oGL•LV bP ed La P Gwd T Lc Pe•d V N S .n C..� t_ ✓ T E V L n N~ 7 ^ ^E ma JEd{oi= •_ 00 om =: o °' a°� � c�a.E� =6 y i� j 4 O. Y r= � �• f C j� G V P T O L �. n Y Y = •J L ) M O O `5`6V t c q G y a V w a '= Q�J9 ♦J 2• —nN�n q'nr� C O �� L Sq� GO} U C� — V T = V N G .j • L N O C Q Q N O 'Y O V •O_ dqr �y qG O Q = L O 9 •�.... N o p d •.. — P U y L `J d •� L T q q c yrjMY LrN�C .T °C Q � � a'di S�SGnL LO yL9 `o b V q u L E V C N° 6 — r 9 L n �_ ✓ E y E w T I'—, C O.'r y 0 P4y =G ^'Fry d`J i pS E. = ny VV O.Pgv dL N= 9 r V V W O g Q y G d a d r C• O y C b G a u ✓ d 0 C9✓ .� N` r —Z w +•i O O g O F L y X5 O•u = a V 9 •f L y N d w q NrJ— d GT L .�. N j O O•. •+ q L d °•.d. °• C =p •E v d' �C v2 .V•` a.acv S` obP C.o.cr = ^C Hb ^6 q0 9y P6 CW JCL O..•V N COAL E 3 r � N •- O L C d d O. V ^? - N O O y �~ G O V. S e.q p•^ tn— Co ✓ N a d al .L..= E rtwi u OI O— t ✓ O N L• ` V N L `' v ��95 �O �J•".NC V q rC ^pp V P•n O�V�•i0•N OOV O 4-J G Ga1rN 6 -9.VrG N 6VLl WtiV WV{.OJ pp V'Op26r QPV LUVO C •� � r 9 C C _n C � n N M 4 d = ma y O•^ O _ �� Ord c yOr •1 d• L V 9 •- r b � c� C O � •+ � O d ° S t Y _ V I _ •� FLFb ^ � > V V �s ✓ O i p= r 'G G O � In ..4. ` E 9 6 O L L N P o M e N O C p O ✓ u 6 9 C 00 'O MT E L N W N O O V r ` y c•• i y q` V N N j q V C r V� C y a O 0 O C � O ^ 3 T q •.. __ N _ d — ^N Oy. E•^...CO N_ q L l 9 9u —d i7G V R n V p c Q E S p O S r d r�� � V a ^ V O✓ O d o L. Orc w "o VO VOq IL G`JCV ��OE N� Ord C�Ld uC aL r_ T —WE„ SV�r d V Nr dqu � ✓�` VO ynV 4+ C �fGO OC• a q Vp aqy qr cQr •^ a rp L M._ L OG TL ✓q •L.•G.` C •V Ngid [QV y IG.II N �• iy N20 O 6L —C Tl 4 `mC0 ^LG C ^Maus c co +•�L v b pGC ra N V 6 � OG ��r ���� NT �•�L r CTC C.• av�C ^^ N V o:l _. V= "a�a•� c r.. e—LJ =�° � i ey c r E� c NN p der nqL MN p n =p_ C LI � s> c^ d O rd•p� GL GL ✓C _ 'u �_LO ` — V_O Oi O OC NI Py PE4 lb0^ 9 j 0 =� _ <m VC LSO °L CI •^ —_ � W W F S 6 Y✓ - G p✓ p • S l Ir V 1 0 C O � V W l 4! N� ~ C N f n ^� C• CI t 11 E t V y V O i L n Boa ccN N c o co nu I 1 d� +P.6 G y N aL � a q W w � �L L G r L 6 L ` e 0 C = J d rL• r c i O y d V V 2 r C � L G° c d a � 4y ` V v r c o A w 9 6 A P V C C T V d O 9 b� L L ,oQ N p r, O ° a o. O L ` r N V Y N W q W r r v E d L r O — C V tpV W r F dN �y �LUt rq �r �Q r LJ� �o aJ 4� c c ° C y V p y cY rv— ca =Eqa c > U p0 °•m r Ur r� cam v rl _ GI LJN ^� E r c T C�JC9M u 8 V `v N S + O ss v U Ar c C A L F •O r G � P E � t ° i E u " ° c a V oa v I lao I � �O q N H V u O e Z � C r r V 6 i ^ -� %'� PLS r�T Oq �_ VV'd OCCPJr G�q trW °yam° q^ o ob c ° q r ` r — Q � y° 6 I I I ay r r � O 66 a . _ V r Ae 9 -- C..•pLr rNG N `Ou til�'*>Ii 1 N V9 ^"nQ r �- {^I aai N J C �r O y r A q q O r 1 oQPU e .a.4 o° c- ° V V V i O — 6V� I 1 d� +P.6 G y N aL � a q W w � �L L G r L 6 L ` e 0 C = J d rL• r c i O y d V V 2 r C � L G° c d a � 4y ` V v r c o A w 9 6 A P V C C T V d O 9 b� L L ,oQ N p r, O ° a o. O L ` r N V Y N W q W r r v E d L r O — C V tpV W r F dN �y �LUt rq �r �Q r LJ� �o aJ 4� c c ° C y V p y cY rv— ca =Eqa c > U p0 °•m r Ur r� cam v rl _ GI LJN ^� E r c T C�JC9M u 8 V `v N S + O ss v U Ar c C A L F •O r G � P E � t ° i E u " ° c a V oa v I lao I � �O q N H V u O e Z � C r r V 6 i ^ -� %'� PLS r�T Oq �_ VV'd OCCPJr G�q trW °yam° p 6 UPI Jr7 G ��I Q � C N 3 I I I I r r 66 I _ V r Ae ... N io•°e N `Ou til�'*>Ii _ L 7o, VvV �- •i r A q q O r ems: e 9i c- ° b ` •LgY�1`V� O — d L �MOQ 90m O A Qi cr � Nq o P c = q _ q F y^ O V L E�qr ApA Oi�` �A�"i �u4.Ai.gi � A C r �• C� V ° " r L P g r C O V V � P .ay° o'_ `Y�q Qua qc•'•r A— `t ccEY >_ rN u�E L s � °�• a n cbour P E cy�^ d c Po Hoc -'ego. cGNO� APP c ° =r —°�U Vl� LC`� PM PCC� .r =OyCP f ✓rVn. °- e•N L u ��01� oou r .r a_c.Lrd N 4� Qr— r° O > O .w q O' r W V W 1 p• Q V J O — O V� 6 0 Y O P q V9N G O q t A c v e u Iq rN 1 I�I NJ 3 d p 6 UPI E ��I Q � C N 3 I I I I r 66 I � r m Q 7 O O O til�'*>Ii _ L 7o, VvV �- •i r A q q O r ems: L P C r r � W � u b r o a Y O ° L QN ' E q � c �^ E T a d a I e � yri{ b M Yi a Y M= c c c r —i Gy 9 T 1 al rj °I $' o c —1 y ul SI — G{ r{ J A C M i u L a p V C L a - 0 q Q L v n. Q E \°, a L, w uv N P � 3 d UPI z ��I Q � r m Q 7 O O O L O _ L Vdd VvV �- •i r A q q O ems: e 9i <qc b ` •LgY�1`V� O — d L _ cr o P c = q _ q F y^ O V A C M i u L a p V C L a - 0 q Q L v n. Q E \°, a L, w uv N P � 1 O Z V J O L C a O _ � v rc �W O w r � c " oD r� L L ad a i o s= C ° ° b p V ° p A _ .o K td ° d 0 a O s b M 0 p d r O N v Y y ° L L .°r b C m 4 r P PW O rTi �V L V i S r O 4 ° N C e• c d o c � G O b _ q L a � 0 N i d O ° L V T V J L7 - � C S f M o .E. n � O P b 7 . uN 4a c° a a " N L — N t ✓d v •' aq eL dfi t P r O e a s� C J ° 6 _ N O N �O @ a Q � rI • N 0 ate• a Nd E _ ✓° a •• L �� L N d V d O � ° ^t•°oci - N L✓ ° a:�w a ° I _ V o o .n N� •✓n ° 9 V d SO. ° Q i M .Ln ✓ 6 d O P C _ I o �o a✓ N L L' r [ L � °✓ ' rW J O C t ✓ L °P c N O Vr � p-. o - N� ✓� q _ � 4 N � 1 p� NrVU - �✓ a� N � �q�L `9 d° Q a � dV6�N N Y� • L ` O= P V V� ✓ 9 ° J � d M r°. ✓ b N a d l� r � p L C �. G✓ 9 _ L� O °� V i] � N IL1 n Q C d 7 O L d L E '•¢ L _ C N '� ca aqL L ✓�� a sir i Mme• � c �o'^.>ec N z D •C C� 0 T r C � G L L a y � Q a L •`✓ oNp _ i a d vde nV ab�N r YVV °� y _. Oa0 ° N� •^� S°' N O °- L C- - C 4 � NL � v p✓ � C � ` L �VnO °O O l� b_ ° 1 0-1 a d L q Ou Gr_ b ✓b r d yL'� r NV L V° G� L vop idE vv L c ° » C• d O V O O i V .Y.d r d ° d l p_ C ✓ a O s b M 0 p d r O N v Y y ° L L .°r b C m 4 r P PW O rTi �V L V i S r O 4 ° N C e• c d o c � G O b _ q L a � 0 N i d O ° L V T V J L7 - � C S f M o .E. n � O P b 7 . uN 4a c° a a " N L — N t ✓d v •' aq eL dfi t P r O e a s� C J ° 6 _ N O N �O @ a Q � rI • N 0 ate• a Nd E _ � ° ^t•°oci - N a:�w n oa ibo o v =ee� N� V ° Q i M 6 V ✓ 6 d d T L° ' O N L L' r [ L � °✓ ' rW J O C t ✓ L °P y C N O Vr O l N N3]✓ ✓ V C r �� ✓ L r q 4 O qr N � NrVU i'Y� bOiwL N C LSO `9 YdE � dV6�N N Y� _PL]•.. 6 °y Vt •i'd �D6 r N L r O d l� r �O It.T� �Vn fi C °— O °� i] � N n I.1 Ir ✓ N e L N '•¢ L _ C N '� aqL L ✓�� a sir i Mme• � c �o'^.>ec N z nV ab�N r YVV °� y _. Oa0 ° N� •^� S°' N O C q L C- - C 4 � NL � v p✓ � d Q� � ` L �VnO °O O l� b_ y a °L_✓ 1 0� 6P= °^ Pt Ou Gr_ b COO yL'� r NV V° CC yN NL °rr •� V ql Y 9 �i^ °_ °'c= P.u.. °ce ° °' a yn _ L ce i. LOd � i-• i° 9d`ou .T. ° iqq _o_✓ L° i'v .°`ce -i ✓� PeL py Y �i -V�K' L9W 6 -> Va LV r ✓L_ b L °✓ L a C L r ✓ — ° O M E O \. 7Z �' ✓ n _N C T •w d D .✓n C C \° °t v O c c l Oat l P y ` 6 i� c aW pL ` u _" F6 ac c -d o QLe Leo c u do G LU ru eD P u� .T.r ✓_D r ° NV�= _ OL IVV� L�� G+ =.ate `O+ ✓c°i O VbVP °.Ln wCi O n °V� ✓ ✓C �G �.p� MVP° Vr `WT ONV NT E e Yr .r 6•�CT N VC 4 V p� V W✓ V 3 n 9 V 0 P N r �_J .6 l v V N O i d rl P V Pr V U 9 j O N _ f P _ FC O ` � C �� �• u r c � o Y �= b r r G l > p V r Gt � d �° d QO cr c q= v �• of i a � .'+ c u r i � ..� � p .+ a• E �J7 Gj O�vf pG:a O.CN O V-P 66 ►� d C V - a C = O � N �V N d C = o °aE ESr O ` V c�- O 4 c4° N O O N d V c c P o r c G N T ` V _ d .p.. u A 0 O c C a t1�VLl f c {Ito i n H RESOLUTION NO. 84 -60 -A A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTING MODIFICATIONS TO RESOLUTION 84 -60 APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12365 WHEREAS, on the 27th day of June, 1984, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved Resolution 84 -60 for Tentative Tract 12365 filed by Western Properties for the above project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of July, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider certain modifications to the adopting Resolution. fellows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following conditions shall be added: 1. A lattice screening material shall be provided on the end of carports nearest public streets. 2. Details for carports shall be included in the construction plans for review and approval by the City Planner. The lattice screens shall be properly maintained by the management company, including repair and repainting as required. SECTION 2: That Resolution 84 -60 -A for Tract 12365 is approved subject to the Conditions and attached Standard Conditions set forth in Resolution 84 -60 approved by the Planning Commission on June 27, 1984. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25th DAY OF JULY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary C -17 Li I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of July, 1934, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E C— N t WIS HOMES 6 With Mountain Aenue / P.O. Box 670 / UPioho. CA 91786 / 714 985x971 July 20, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9340 Base Line Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Dan Coleman Subject: Tract No. 12365 Carport Screening Dear Mr. Coleman: Hand Delivered - RECEIVED — VTY;F RANCHO CLIW10�"A pLANNING VVISTON jljl_ � Q 198 PIA MA 7 a�191�IuI�11i213 °41516 As the result of our discussions with the Design Review Committee on July 17, 1984 pertaining to carport screening for the subject tract, ac- companying this letter is an illustrative display panel with photographs of other lattice carport screening installations, a sample of the lattice, and a small sample of a plastic lath now available for use in latticework. Lewis Homes feels that the wood lattice is the "warmer" of the two and will give a more natural appearance to the finished project. Since Lewis Homes will own and manage the apartments, 1 have taken the opportunity to enclose a letter from our property management company, outlining our main- tenance record. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. Sincerely, LWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA ,STAN BELL, A.I.A. Staff Architect SKB:jgc Attachments L Republic Management Co. 1156 North Mountain Avenue / P.O. Box 610 / Upland. California 91786 Phone: 714 /985 -0971 July 19, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Attention: Dan Coleman Dear Mr. Coleman: ernEriVED —. CST '•'`�!' CUCAMONGA ' a510N JUL N Q 1984 AM PM 7181: ,_t;::;l_li1213141516 Our co,-,;F =ry handles the property management for all of the Lewis Homes and Lewis Development Co, rental properties. We currently oversee seven complexes in the Southern California area, representing over 600 residential units. Through our regular maintenance program and daily upkeep, we have been able to maintain the sharp and attractive appearance which our complexes are noted for. Repairs are handled expediently by our managers, and other items, such as exterior painting, replanting, and resealing of parking lots, are scheduled as required. I have seen the pr3posed lattice enclosure and do not foresee any unusual problems for the maintenance of these enclosures. As i mentioned, we are proud of the fact that our apartments are considered to be highly desirable locations and we will continue to maintain the high standards at all future locations. Should you have any questions or need further information, please don't hesitate to call me. Sincerely yours, REPUBLIC MANAGEMENT CO J 'omack Director of Property Management JW:blm 11 dly2100 11 E 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 25, 1984 197.7 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Pick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 10827 - PACIFIC LIGHTING - A total residential development of 294 single family homes on 57.7 acres of land in the Low (2 -4 du /ac) and Low - Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Residential Districts generally located between Haven and Hermosa, south of Wilson Avenue - APN 201- 181 -02, 12, 13, 14, 63, 65, 69, and 79. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map, site plan, elevations, and Negative Declaration B. Purpose: Development of 294 single family detdched home C. Location: Between Haven and Hermosa, south of Wilson Avenue x 'Ibit "A") D. Parcel Size: 57.7 acres E. Existing Zoning: Low and Low - Medium Residential F. Existing Land Use: Vacant G. Project Density: 5.1 dwelling units per acre H. Surroundin Land Use anal Zonin : North - School, single family residential, vacant; Low and Low - Medium Residential South - Vacant, water conservation basin; Low and Low - Medium Residential and Flood Control East - Chaffey College; Low- Medium Residential West - Single family tract and vacant; Very Low Residential I. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Low and Low - Medium Residential North - Proposed school sites and Low- Medium Residential South - Low and Low - Medium Residential and Proposed Park East - Chaffey College West - Very Low Residential ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSiOrI STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 10827 /Pacific Lighting July 25, 1984 Page 2 II. I. Site Characteristics: The project site slopes from north to south at approx ately £% grade and is vacant with exception of a few native trees. �• Applicable Regulations' The Development Code s ir, permits single family dwellin g the Low and Low - Medium Residential Districts. The project has been designed under the Optional Development Standards. AL__ riA Y_ SIS. A. General: This project is a revision to the previously approved Tract 0826, shown on Exhibit "B ". s eliminated the townhomes and estate horn= The applicant has from the project and provided all single family detached dwellings on lots sizes generally ranging from 4,000 to 61000 square feet in size. The General Plan designates this area as Low (2 -4 duiac) and ow - Medium (4 -8 d, /ac) Residential. This project is planned at approximately 5.- units per acre. The previously approved project. had 310 dwelling units consisting of 202 attached townhomes, 81 patio homes, and 27 estate homes. The proposed project consists of 294 single family detached homes. Q The project provides a mixture of 1- and 2 -story homes with one, two and three bedroom floor plans and a variety of exterior treatments. Recreation facilities include open play lawn, volleyball court, basketball court and tot lot, see Exhibit "H ". The floor pla:,s range in size from 1,682 square feet to 1,850 square feet on five different floor plans. Access to the project will be provided from a new through street, Street "A ", between Haven and Hermosa, as Exhibit "En. sha M on The ea is project site "falls" approximate y 9 feet from north to south. The proposed grading cc;,clI and street orientation has been designed to take up this differential in large slope embankments, primarily in a rear yard condition. The conceptual grading plan, Exhibit °I °, indicates that rear yard slopes and slopes along the slopeaheights t are significant? in re1glrt to 21 feet. These of 8 feet maximum for rear y greater than the City standard yard slopes. The intnlnt of �r,_ _• =,+�ument code and Gradin icier for gran nq is "to mir.imi -e the a 1 cts o road -3in by coura in mass radin and excessive e slopes to nsure t at na0ura character o terrain is reta�ne . °° S po icy, an - dot maximum rear o �mp.ement yar scope height was Y L:J 11 COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tract 10827 /Pacific Lighting 1984 established. forth in the slopes, se natural looki slope gradier Further, several grading design criteria were set Development Code to discourage "engineered" 2:1 Exhibit "N ". These criteria encourage more ig contoured slopes with variety in steepness in to cre:.te an undulating appearance. Based upon slope heights and their "enainee-red" annaaranra These policies and criteria were reaffirmed by the Planning Commission during their workshop meeting on a similar project - - Tentative Tract 12544 by the William Lyon Company. The Comasission affirmed that 8 feet is the maximum design goal and that slopes greater than 8 feet in height may be approved by the Commission subject to design mitigation techniques (e.g., landscaping). Although this project provides extensive slope planting, the slope heights would appear to be in conflict with the Commission's intent. This issue was referred to the Commission from the Desion Review rnm- „irrAo Alternatives: If it is the Commission's desire to eliminate s aped !nigher than 8 feet, there are basically two options for this project: (1) orient streets in a more north -south direction and take up grade in smaller side yard slopes /retaining walls; or (2) cluster units around common open spaces where grade can be taken up gradually. The applicant desires to retain the east -west street orientation for reasons described in the supplemental booklet prepared by the applicant's consultant. Cross sections of the site have been provided to illustrate the proposed grading concept (Exhibit "K ") and alternative north -south streets (Exhibit "0 "). Aesthetically, to soften the slope appearance, the slopes should be contoured and heavily planted. However, contouring slooes would take more space and would necessitate site nlan Desian Review Committee: The Committee was primarily concerned with the proposed grading concept and related street orientation that results in large slope embankments. This was considered a major policy issue and referred to the full Commission for review and consideration. The Committee recommended approval of the architecture subject to providing upgraded treatment (siding and window trim) of the upper story elevations along Street "A ". Further, shrubs were recommended at the end of the cul -de -sacs with emergency access connections to discourage non - emergency through traffic and preserve the cul -de -sac character. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 10827 /Pacific Lighting July 25, 1984 Page 4 D. Development Review Committee: The project was reviewed for conformance with the Optional Low - Medium Development Standards. Based upon this review, the Committee indicated that the open space area should be expanded to include recreation facilities. In addition, front yard landscaping and solar water heating are required. The applicant revised the site plan to eliminate two lots to provide a sand volleyball court and paved basketball court, see Exhibit "u ". This project has been designed to provide 18 -f,:;ot minimum garage setbacks from back of sidewalk, 60 -foot right -of -way, and 36 -foot pavement section, as shown on Exhibit "J ". However, the Planning Commission recently prohibited the use of private streets for a large project such as this. The Optional Standards require a 20 -foot average (15 -foot minimum) building setback from the right -of -way line on public streets. Therefore, the ap icant has propose private streets with an offer of public dedication to allow this project to proceed ahead of the amendments to the Low - Medium Development Standards. The streets have been designed with sidewalks on one side only, see Exhibit "J "_ The Development Code sidewalk standards require sidewalks on one side only in the Equestrian /Rural area. However, this policy was intended to promote the rural character of 1/2 acre and larger lot areas of Alta Loma. The Engineering Division recommends that sidewaiks be provided on bo.-h sides because of the large number of smaller lots. To accommodate sidewalks on both sides would require replotting many houses to retain the 18 -foot minimum garage setback and 15 -foot flat usable rear yard area. E. Trails Committee: The project is within the Equestrian /Rural Overlay District and was reviewed by the Trails Committee. The adopted Master Plan of trails indicates an East -west community trail generally in the area of the flood control basin, see Exhibit "L ". The Flood Control District has not agreed to date with the trail use because of liability problems. As suggested by the applicant, the community trail could be provided along the north side of Street "A ". The Trail's Committee recommended that this is the only viable solution to providing this needed east -west trail connection_ At a minimum, this would require providing a 10 -foot wide flat trail width. G. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. is Staff has completed the Envirom�iental Checklist and visited the project site. Based upon this review, staff has determined the —b—q n PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 10827 /Pacific Lighting July 25, 1934 Page 5 proposed grading concept may significantly alter the existing topography and create excessive slope heights that conflict with the City's grading policies and standards. Trio applicant proposes to mitigate the appearance of the slopes through extensive planting. Alternative mitigation techniques include clustering or a north -south street orientation. M. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing �n The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and 42 notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has beer, received either for or against this project. VI. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the pr _oject be continued to „�C,,,b ab uebcrioeu nerein. finis would require the consent o the applicant and authorization to extend the processing time limits established by State law for tract maps. Because of the substantial nature of these revisions, the revised project should be brought back through the Committee review process. However, if the Commission feels that the required facts for findings can he ® supported through conditions to mitigate grading concerns, then ® adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval would be appropriate. If the Commission cannot support the facts for finding, the attached Resolution of Denial would be supported by the following facts: ck ty E 1. The proposed conceptual grading plan indicates slope heights up to 20 feet in height throughout the project. 2. The proposed grading plan concept would create "engineered" 2:1 slopes and slope embankments of excessive heights that are inconsistent with the policies and intent of the Development Code, particularly Seczion 17.06.010 E -5 and 17.08.090 C.9. :jr tted, -P °-S PLANNING COCvMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 10827 /Pacific Lighting July 25, 1984 Page G E Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Previously Approved Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "D" - Aerial Photograph Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Master Plan Exhibit "F" - Proposed Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "G" - Detailed Site Plan /Phasing Plan Exhibit "H" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "I" - Grading Plan Exhibit "J" - Typical Streetscape Exhibit "K" - Proposed Grading Sections Exhibit "L" - Trails Map Exhibit "M" - Elevations Exhibit "N" - Grading Sketches Exhibit "0" - Alternate Grading Section Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval Resolution of Denial 11 2 —b —(0 r-.. --. . '!) fA[wtp Tff1�OT r. 0 O. CITY Or ITEXI: —���Z / 9 I'�CHO CUCAN'IO \GA. TITLE, . PLANNING DIVISION E Barr SCALE= - 1 - g O i II '� ' lui I �N r s 1 i � O e ! e i e� 3 0 Q a O ! _ � I I � ICI a I _ ���.— ,_. i ' 1- - -- — - -� - -�• - -- � —� - - - = -- � —D II �I � O e ! e i e� 3 0 Q a O ! _ � I I � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiIO \TGA R- AI\TITI, \G ©I`'M.N 0 ITEM: -""It/Cash i TITLE: U EXHIBIT- - Cw_ SCALE-- l J —c E I j O a ✓/-� NNtOR TH y' 1 t. _ Y 6`•����h 'q r�3�" T .I' t ��'i, ACM . f � T��.ov4 ��l�t �i �� �4�. � it /1s �;/^'�y- Jfya•� ��i,i S,; S!�����"^'� —i —aP ` j >r'1�_r1 i . ° +�x� {, 9. r •w'/ rs`�' �, Vi ��� I JI'i� u r •y.�v y, � y, ! ;r T ✓. '�'°.y `� 1 �`! ♦ Yt �. i. ��'t1 ';�� '. ' 'i7ei °.Y l,a i : � a 'j ...1 f a� .tip -rl• •r � ;�.1 ' y,. "4 i. � i si 9A � <L .: •t � Tom+ yr u � �' �! �" �? �'Ir� : �r• \21T�' Lax : � ( •r � I I l 1.+^," -,T �+�'4� i•: r �i t•v� li +.C�tiT 1•' y 1 ♦ �� v T' �.., rr .Yid y \+ .f th C� �'� ",•' �. �f 15 r. rr 'w'. Z ,, �C�i N~I � .2 Yr��cy,,, x�. '..1 — �1°�r'.� 'p�- .v- Ty�r'�•47`G .7 _',`.d^E'4�:. ;s +. r 1 {`.`.+.tir �w r i. `'� �ii � yJ ♦:� A .��5 .1 �. .. -f J .i 4 Vim- ., �' All Ji E - I ( �- � I •.+".....• ,mil\ \ tJJ"Qt ��.. �. •o+a a »sw�t.�' °�`•'\ I . •:�� i."�YV.s...yl,.s6v °®"' —' ^aC _•+. <�=il Jill: Z a1 1ijr NL It I � �l � 3 J by o`= �.I�. ia16 91.11 1.1:�� rPb�i�� •i yzx- � -�sr'i ' � 1 i - . _ •'� }�� -,*�-7ts �7„3'�Y a�l',��97Po��„� f�:�gi�`�°53`ja3�:J1��' "�Jlo�•`}} -; �r !•i i_' `_"`�. V6 Z-16 �'`- .�aous�: y ^,•� •-{ j G 77��`S 11ri,17.3�131b?7,i�cYi�.l I _ \ - • t i r....o ' `i ^^��''�� �., =tau .. llp. J r ��•r...�'�i..!" I dl I i . i =I y _..�;1 e F�or:r�ra aY �a1'a�]a ?'► " %I -I I i � CV 1N'O l pyr+ H CITE' OF RA -N-CHO CUCAN'10\GA �: PL VNNING DR'ISIONi E rHiGiT: -— SCALE =_ •�— -�)-i I Vii`_ ►c.:a„� J, i O'J 1!j 1• I F4 hid. ;Iii fl t'�lif I 11 , •G: Iw • f. I ..;� 1� I I • 1 1 El 11 CuouleD 10 014OUE-d -.Q Jtft t 1= E- �7 z jr. 3 L 14y a; 0 D USL mo CC 5) 0 :5 Z. 57 A A L ird -W%k- 412 A3 4L Ax APt' B A lk i4ve r) Z7� 77 01 0 G (D (D Q) 0 e!xHorr 0 ULI�UULUUUT) 014ouMd S ------ E=MMMME== I I H 45 E U7 U, (.7 0, ar) L-I 9 Lo all o alp ✓•; ZQ. I V'r L4 J r I'- Lb Lr:I �t 1ST a 11 rN t lizk- C11 E E 9- J - -No I I � F I I I 3. i r. 0 b I i 014OUL-d �� \ \ �( �} / �,� \\ .6� \. §� ! � //\ � \ /�§ � �� / ©_I. � - 110 � IN T '% /4 # f Li � \j} A-2 � - 110 � IN T '% /4 # f Li 11 O Z co u G ¢ = S a TRAIL SYSTEM -- EXISTING COMMUNITY . o. o sPROPOSED COMMUNITY n-- REGIONAL MULTI— SYSTEM ?FofbSSo tsAtRmawlTv TVmk% L Lcco mom TWIL TPA LA CITY OF rrE:*%i- 10 4Zi �AiNCHO CUC.5 IO \GA PLANNING D,\'LSION F \iiiBl C _%.e- SCALE= r► a OLioue8 I I is Ll 77 7-7 I I is Ll E 11 E oq:)Ueu -I� 9 kL T)-)q of z of -771 �w-� T-771 T)-)q of z of a oyOuey {1� 7 7 Il, I I i� I Y L o �H o �; J I E 11 i i E 014OUEU =- FEE,; Pis Z�3 LL i Eli Ali co -� h —,z I T `'404 p x `��� � ";La- ft E E3 46 r ® Section 17.06.010 (b) To reduce the impact of grading on adjacent properties, hard edges left by cut and fill operations shall be given a rounded appearance that closely resembles the natural contours of the lard. µa c m 7WIZ rte'; =5ea 6WK t 3WK 644.�BYf$ L CAS-r= ArcVfUOrgL .Yr,..u�.rs /rtkr 2'f sw�C (c) The character of the natural terrain shall be preserved wherever possible. In hillside areas, the creation of level areas, such as building pads, shall be minimized. However, where level areas are necessary, grading concepts must provide variety in the steepness of slopes and configuration. (d) Created slopes, either cut and fill that are adjacent to roadways shall be graded in such a way that an undulating appearance in the graded plane be provided for a more attractive and natural looking streetscape than engineered or uniform slopes. MTC1lM� Ct /eO�QWY V.MCq57Y /N LNO'JLA-17AI � sLCP.- d^..r P.�y/wb C V NORTH CITY OF ITEM: i� kv 7.7 RANCHO C1,,cA. ,I0 \'GA PLANNING DIVISIO\ EXHIi3IT =_scats: -- r' T t CITY OF R,NCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL, STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this fora must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the Project application is made. Upon pt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will Part II Of the Initial-Stud Prepare Committee wil]. meet y• The Development Review (10) days will Band take action no later than ten Project is of re the public meeting at which time the three determinations: The Committee will make one of ficant environmental impact and pao Negative lDeclarationgni- will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Haverlwood Ranch APPLICANTS NAMI_I ADDRESS 18 Brookhollow Drive, Santa Ana CA ELEPHONE:_aodhavan Proper+ies STEPHEN PaRRv o. 2705 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Paul V. Edwards, Re nNTA Lds TED Group, 3790 -J Airport hoop, Costa Mesa, Alternate: Frank R_ Wiliians, Associated Engineers5(774)OgII6 -5878 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRi:SS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Between Haven Ave. & He _rTdsa Ave.. dDnrn rim�re i.. awn. - Qrsc LIST OTHER PERMITS N C�SARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE FEDERAL THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH c+r-a; r CH PEAS RITS 1) Encroachment n - I -1 o- z! C J 11 l i PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUAB FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AN T IF ANY- Proi_ct Area = 57.70 or c r PROPOSED BUILDI.IGS, and 56.12 net acres. T JZROtvi `IQ`SAL SETS_ OF THE: TSROTREESSZTE DESCRIBE THE EN' INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPH , SCENIC ASPECTS, USE ANI14ALS, ANY CULTURAL. HISTORICAL OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES' AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE: (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) ect si Is the project part of a larger proj ct one of a series e, small, of cumulative actions, which although individually may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No. Z -2 --b-as t FILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X I. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X S. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or diaposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of PD 82-02, oraifjnc answers above: 1. As wits the app !quired to accommo atee— internar Fircu 7plement dd10in7nq pubs c :,u pr5vate Properties. slopes rili be minimized and appropriately planted. IMPCRTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts; statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information ms.v be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date Signature Title '.':.. < ��...•,. �!.. �- b- lv 1-3 1 C� j{ r 1 r G J O T •° G w c r- r G " u C: G G .r i L _ C � N N r7 o w �� N Q =3 N1 3 q U y O j c' U C d >flI 4 C 103 U y i 4 A d y i -r� O• G W T V r 10 tJ U y = O L =5 j d d O r C) C N1 � O r � L to r N O = 6t O O Z C +' r0 3 tU L 4- N M T y 6 r � > 7 L ,C, U T 1 Z� OT Cl r p. O yL O row O O = i G w O N N O. r Z C O 4J O n U J .0 O = O U tn r r •r w T w K L r O y Z O N ,I .1 N O 1 c +,II u G v ^� co7 all Mi and qI QI MIa � aD q q C M u Q Lo a -I NI U a0I � N C1 O NI ^� cn i�- C t.lY q tb 1 M J OI �. >•. O r- •r � N d A 6 L3- q T C O CO G r p t G Ln � O O O N T •r o c " o u O n' u, 41 Z O tr1 c- � q � C ap � O` r• i I ` 1 1 1 t i I t� �1 1 1 O � r W O d ti V D G A N T U w d .tom Y C I 1 O O q q C CO aOl � r r O O O O O p CD O O O O CD p 0 a co r w- O v O g� l p� G + � 1 1 cr C d d Q M N M d y O O j > > WE T 1 r C 1 tr C 1 tr 11 E 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU'^MONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10827 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10827, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Pacific Lighting Properties, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cou-ty of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 57.7 acres of land located between Haven and Hermosa, south of Wilson, into 321 lots, regularly cane before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on July 25, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10827 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not co.:flict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. -b-a'2 Resolution No. Page 2 I J (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10827, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Extensive slope planting, including staggered clusterzi of trees, shrubs and appropriate ground cover shall be provided per the approved conceptual landscape plan. Details shall be provided in the landscape plans and reviewed by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of grading permits. 2. Provide a Community Trail on north side of Street "A ", wish a minimum 10 -foot wide trail width between trail fencing. Trail shall be constructed per City standard and proper public dedication shall be Provided. The final design shall be coordinated with street improvement, grading and landscaping plans and be reviewed by the Trails Committee prior to approval of street improvement, grading and landscape plans. 3. Upper story rear elevations along Street `A" shall be provided with upgraded architectural treatment, such as siding and wood trim. Revised elevations shall be reviewed by the Desioe Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits, 4. Minimum 18 -foot garage setback shall be prc ided behind sidewalk or behind curb whe'ge there is no sidewalk. 5. The developer shall contact the Foothill Fire District regarding annexation into the Foothill Fire District's Community Facilities District. The District is being formed under the Mello Roos Community Facilities Act. 6. Plant shrubs at end of cul -de -sacs with emergency access connections to discourage non- emergency througti traffic. -aj Resolution No. Page 3 7, All slopes and common open space areas and landscaping of same shall be permanently maintained by a homeowners ` aysoc Such proof oi°tm� nte� aye acceptable to =`•� ineering shall be submitted to the Planning and Eng Divisions prior to issuance of building permits. S. A publicly dedicated Community Trail shall be provided along Haven Avenue in accordance with the Equestrian 7rai1 Plan. A detailed trail Flan indicating widths, maximum slopes, Physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance to and with City trail standards, shall be su City Planner p approval and approved by the recordation of the final map. 9, Details and typical elevations of walls and fences sha ?? be included. in the rinalPianner,uction packet to the satif action of the City 1G. cul-de—sacs The emergency connection between -de -sacs shall be constructed with a layer of decomposed grant -I compacted to Foothill Fire District tailsashallabe ® covered with too soil pe lans.to Dee satisfaction included in th� landscape p of the City Planner. GRA_ J 1. Provide agreements with adjacent prove, owners a'lfbe all off -site grading. said agreements submitted for review by the Building tilfficial prior to appro`i-11 of final grading p ?an and issuance of grading permits. ? designed to accept South runoff offrom�ecom or. shall sl peSe Details shall be included in the final grading Plan to the satisfaction of the Building Official. slopes shall maintain minimum 2 -foot an 3. Ton of d City grading 3 -foci setbacks from boundary line respectively, and exterior boundary of tract, P standards. a, Top or toe of slopes shall maintain a minimum 15 -foot setb and area pe.� house to c 7rstandards,at, usable rear 30 ,•Jc - E 5• Slopes adjacent to Street "A" shall be graded with undulating appearance with variety in slope bank gradients. Detaiis shall be included in final grading, plan to the satisfaction of the City ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. The proposed cross gutters across Street "All at Street "H" shall be eliminated. The et A drain along ot 78 shat; Proposed storm g be extended to intercept runoff from this intersection. 2. The proposed storm drain along Lo*_ 99 shall 4e extended to the intersection of Street "F" and Court 3. Provisions shall be made for future street connections to the vacant parcels to the north, east and west from the proposed Streets `D", "F", and "G" to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. The proposed storm drain easements along Lots 135 40 and 194 shall be 12 -feet wide. 5. Each phase of the project, as shown on the map, shall provide for a temporary secondary vehicular access to that phase to the satisfaction of the City Engineei and Foothill Fire District. d. A permit from San Bernardino County Flood Control District shall be required for grading and drainage on their property. APPROVED AND ADOPTED ?HIS 25th DAY OF JULY, 1984. PLANNING COPtMISSION OF THE CITY OF RrPNCHO cuCA"^V^^ BY: C�nnis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST:- Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary �J Resolution No- Page 5 -,: s Of I, Rick Gomez, Deputy e hereby certify Ttha thaaforeaoinguResolution was duly and Rancho Cucamonga, regularly introduced, passed, and1�arpmeet ng of the LPlanningmComnission held city )f Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular following vote -to -wit: on the ?_5th day of July, 1984 by AYES: COmM1MISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: co!'"MISSIONERS: 11 l J Ni 0 J J J O 1 6 v C zs O O K O L� LG L ^ _ 0 0 r L9 n q M✓» V S O S q 7r ^ ^VNq —aG e x- 1 i O 0 c N V y O � J V N6 O 6 1 O �v c N n V j O M L 0 N r U occ G i e O r d0 c y j L V -L e C n V 9 . C O M ¢O .2 V O c tai � Vr ti. r O y C c ` L O d� 1 21� O f P n a O 0 -J c 0 V y t E O I4 V a 0 W a V 0 o� aj uI L K V 6 T O V � J O 6 _ 6 O K u - L ' r q - Q Y • V V C 4 q c G `.y NLano o E Q c o »^ L 'L y ro Y nM`FJ q t » L » n Y e c e eoN L nc�8r.. Tr Y �� cue ed —oP = o 6 Y� c » C n 7 C p V O L .y V,cey c N O V +pro c = o oq » V G v � r q ' V - G ° n ' Gna iL- O✓y c oGn q O V V p q V V r E-� e a > U y - 0 �� 9 n o• 6 0 e m C ro r r L » O q q 9 - C » rroK E<^ TN E NI 00 9gO r » O O V= q G p O 4 r c O r G J c —2-Z ro O °L Oro0 � 7✓ >00'4V O q °E`EL m »� i -y - ro�oq.roan� r_ OL �yT u C G r O`G__.oEY -rOL� _0 6L M 6 C 2 eCr F IIV » P O OmV-J Cr C � L 9 O E� \ � q r aG r� s i E c L y V P Q r q l t Lam cE� Y Z J y Y L v u V N ? L Gr_ L G EO v C O L a G p V y_ d ^S dd 7 VD > V •^L e � ° a v�n= �qyE v w J ^ •] V m v. C .O L u c n° 4 6 r L ^ V L d G T V a.- i V P O C e. 6 L u Z t V C•�t V u- Q V a. O � a r CO O d x E d o C q O V `O V V N qC a 0 V�DLGa•° L .°r• � ` N M � C• E O C r L �a0^ ND Y L =LNr°. V = V U L P p 7 V W uu,r �.o •o i LL Cr PL C V T C yg V 9 q O C C L U y C 9 L V J Ct� 9 C V d r°r _L oTd o ° Li C _r a O N c c r � o C✓ C V V = n J t C L Y ^ O r O v� C p L O L r • P L o E y V 9 E l a E e C - L �w P J Gg y Sb CO O O L V V,O �a r c o C C G Y 6 � = L C 9 • O ' w Y r � U V x L G V v J E ^D L j O dq N °e C w T � O L V G y x V d � eL c•e V 9 O 6 a � cap U O L D o T V -„ „ n• q N L - G •'� r C >— c O N L f=> >�o O Gam' C - G 9 ^ � 6 Ny V a i - q T ni• y a r t'z E V i V q„ p q Y L q V G 6N^ C a� rr D 6 r r O uLv auq P races Nv q_ L. 6 N d L V � L -. ^aD a G �C. V > L J A V N L P cv�a d � _a •cw - „ u A d w Lv.`o O G J T < u ire= L F, V O e W m \NVIf � � • jY —F S iL u_rL V C O V C ' � C •C r p J ea vc rzcv i'o °? V L ^ =L 6V y L c q C > c r S U y V PV rCGr LQV 4 JL V L e_O < V `V' w T NO ^� rrN _ c � = C 6 CL� >V•� V G PL G G y L -4T G M r UNa -jV CNWUa V V L C•°G2�p ti C q r e _ c c c � GL� Oyy.r D y J C d= wlD u • Pr S � C O v 9 L O V ° C = V y coc A d C G M N •^E> N � O O C W C 9 30 p l Lo d C t P t 9 N W a v e u C =C • ° d 9 L c E.t.a n E 5m •� •. O PAL 6• p •.. _• C C. L V G l i l l ri �E v L"LVDL NG {> CL G � V •a L L t G N 9 _ cW S ' u coy �YUU c c ` N � —'L O �_ -•tc �b `yu zxN \.o i � q r aG r� s i E c L y V P Q r q l t Lam cE� Y Z J y Y L v u V N ? L Gr_ L G EO v C O L a G p V y_ d ^S dd 7 VD > V •^L e � ° a v�n= �qyE v w J ^ •] V m v. C .O L u c n° 4 6 r L ^ V L d G T V a.- i V P O C e. 6 L u Z t V C•�t V u- Q V a. O � a r CO O d x E d o C q O V `O V V N qC a 0 V�DLGa•° L .°r• � ` N M � C• E O C r L �a0^ ND Y L =LNr°. V = V U L P p 7 V W uu,r �.o •o i LL Cr PL C V T C yg V 9 q O C C L U y C 9 L V J Ct� 9 C V d r°r _L oTd o ° Li C _r a O N c c r � o C✓ C V V = n J t C L Y ^ O r O v� C p L O L r • P L o E y V 9 E l a E e C - L �w P J Gg y Sb CO O O L V V,O �a r c o C C G Y 6 � = L C 9 • O ' w Y r � U V x L G V v J E ^D L j O dq N °e C w T � O L V G y x V d � eL c•e V 9 O 6 a � cap U O L D o T V -„ „ n• q N L - G •'� r C >— c O N L f=> >�o O Gam' C - G 9 ^ � 6 Ny V a i - q T ni• y a r t'z E V i V q„ p q Y L q V G 6N^ C a� rr D 6 r r O uLv auq P races Nv q_ L. 6 N d L V � L -. ^aD a G �C. V > L J A V N L P cv�a d � _a •cw - „ u A d w Lv.`o O G J T < u ire= L F, V O e W m \NVIf � � • jY —F S iL u_rL V C O V C ' � C •C r p J ea vc rzcv i'o °? V L ^ =L 6V y L c q C > c r S U y V PV rCGr LQV 4 JL V L e_O < V `V' w T NO ^� rrN _ c � = C 6 CL� >V•� V G PL G G y L -4T G M r UNa -jV CNWUa V V L C•°G2�p ti C q r e _ c c c � GL� Oyy.r D y J C d= wlD u • Pr S � C O v 9 L O V ° C = V y coc A d C G M N •^E> N � O O C W C 9 30 p l Lo d C t P t 9 N W a v e u C =C • ° d 9 L c E.t.a n E 5m E dV✓ O P� dU;C 9? P =nE OD q DO9 'C rtc V '� '� 9 n G w - C^ O✓ ^ C� N O O L ^ 9 - ^ , v3 VAC wurr U 4 n C =n _O d 6 A nn3 ='V 9d C �N� `a 4wi Nj L dn40 yi° i p Fi✓ ^�' r ✓ L TJ P ✓nw AE9 C �0 V Ld � P N .e V C ' 0 Oy ✓ W I V -� p A ` a L `✓^^ rcr S orcG Pi.o or ✓p w ^P a oz � N9 Gr ^w �K p c� ql V Q= idy> <ci QJ O✓ � .VCd ✓ d 9' CS N O�V VT _ ���9✓ O4 .did L✓ nV A� OO CLC O - _O _ C L y N_ _^ �✓ V C_ T .n ✓ � V N � L C � L _ V VJ .Li.NA -J ✓_. Nd�p •O�✓ V ^ n��L9 4P V y C ✓E C O O C CO E j e C A cc 9 d O P O S ` ` OV 7 �. _ �✓ C 73 NuU 2 =Cn A _O- _AC �O t 1 U�J_C•+O r ✓ON - _�_ '�D� l PC C 7 i C ✓ V 7rJ ^ n 4^ o 4✓ _ D T✓ U �J N r A C C G L L n 4 C A p� � n ^� __ a V✓ 7_ 9 0 �✓ n L C 9 � C N L A ✓ C ^ a rG- r0?'6 9 _ C La nV O J � O' .V.r L L ^v -V✓ •J✓ NO Y C__ V 'w _l V ^uj d_' V r 6_ A L _A d✓ ✓^ X00 w.. T -� V i ✓ a✓i. L _ = n N O j_ V -.- j •O O_ ✓ C _. d d A D L L-..y� N= ! _V N SsN N L v r -L n.'J q � q O� L n V P L V C r p V d o i ��� r t L19 r j n 9 � d -J L! d � � Cm n� C E� r ✓ L� O c ✓COQ n 3 'Ji 3✓ �v. V U A ^^ .tee 0 N O C N 'a L i t C 6✓ n P I I _ It Z - L __ r l s I O O, J c i A q Y G_ N_ w Z7 M N ✓.. - U n� � O'Yw E A T 4 V C d E q✓ L O O '- L C _ AG L ^J' v "JO .0.. ✓ PLC VQ6 N` 0. O� ^V .wr ✓2! _P- _^ __✓ _. =L- n.r .VwV V CDG -C q q O^xl V% V� N n ✓ C' = •..r V ' V C N C C N^ C U d VJ 9 y O T� ' >. 0 c� -` ` -`c n =✓ -Y- a� -_0 j 4 iL E °c u .o= cdc c _N ✓ _ o` n N Y._ V"o A d` O L V^ P C•6' G L E _ v_ .co o ✓ V- n N ✓ cu. YC- =rL Nuu ^, N N V L n '� L 9 d L C i A O Q C V c^ C o^ PA Eda� O C TC�nir �V�MW j 4 C 4 VO j� r NON__V_ _ MV_ A'� ✓ tV AOV `UwN L ^P Nr dr 7L C0 NOV -A _J =q ' C O l d9 =U V M ' ✓ ^l CP -r C VO nN N r �_ v ^ V = u C g L _ V� N N 9 ✓ L 37- lLE'- r N� Q.O jNdV C9 -06 6 Y.O nM 1"'ND E 1 f"i dV✓ O P� dU;C 9? P =nE OD q DO9 'C rtc V '� '� 9 n G w - C^ O✓ ^ C� N O O L ^ 9 - E Y pC ✓ N U 4 n C =n _O d 6 A nn3 ='V 9d C N•i `a Nj L dn40 V4.L+ p Fi✓ 6 pY P ✓nw AE9 � p dN Ld O N ✓V 4�0 w.Y tNd �� Oy cc `✓^^ rcr S orcG Pi.o or ✓p w ^P a oz � N9 Gr ^w �K p c� ql V Q= idy> <ci QJ O✓ � .VCd ✓ d 9' CS N O�V VT _ ���9✓ O4 .did L✓ nV A� OO CLC O - 'S V VJ .Li.NA -J ✓_. Nd�p •O�✓ V ^ n��L9 4P V y C ✓E C O O C CO E j e C A cc 9 d O P O S ` ` OV 7 aYS6• a OI L N.°. G.r �2i ✓VpC oOCU 6 ngnOi. `. ^q ^d` OVA qL)t 6Jr• n_ GY r n o✓ ." � 9_n v •' L c P✓ d ^° D c u O L N � 4^ o N U N4_✓ N �O 1 I J 9 p� C _ r^ -65� 0 r .-.iO � O✓ N ^ a q G r_' d. ✓� 4 V v d� N d C c P. �. O 9 i 9 i .0 NO Y Sc 6cLV C �� d -6' L�� n_PC CY"r L1 O ✓OC CC✓ j° UDC ' v •O L4aN YT NC r OO�O nSA ^L wY= pC O� SsN G✓ Nom' -L n.'J � U -� n V - N O N 9 � ✓ O d ✓� 9� ��� L n N _ r = nG_ 00 N =4 ^_^ <L�w. V 0 'v � ✓V Lq ✓COQ r C n p c "f J C N ✓ Gn y0 I I _ It C A O c L 4.Or C C C o 99 j l s I O N T q d` c i A q Y G_ d L O� CjG✓ H .Vn 00 ✓.. - U n� O'Yw VyNV L AV��r ✓n M "• �� U gPCN PLC VQ6 N` 0. O� ^V .wr NN _^ wL ✓- 'y✓ iL OwO O^xl V� 6�` n ✓O LViP`� `�` =90 :c c� e✓ u � ✓.:..�Y�z `vi° i`n °c u .o= C A _N ✓ o` n N Y._ V"o A d` O L V^ P C•6' G L E _ j a .co o e° A 'rd ✓._✓ ✓ cu. YC- =rL Nuu ^, 9N ✓cm i.°.d °` nc� o.� VYVYq _ '-.d.° vc�` �� Eda� �y✓ `` N ^I .c.>� > Q `✓ a O.L. L .Y.. Y49N ✓ 9 J � < O n _ ^ r• 1 f"i L C ✓ r ✓ C cre c O y —➢ _ ✓ C r is LL c ° = Jc "• 6 C — O ✓ O- C q /� nI I L L. V✓ C r r Y v ry^ V a v — n o_ L q O U C O= C• C O. N V 6 G ,✓� F 9 a ps .v i p JI JO P V d y✓ L V y�OE e• EOU J _ C V ✓ L � O N N p➢ � G o o c p d i iV O✓ J G� V Cry CL vL l C v L p r O r ✓ � u � L ECp a� T' �r pp V b V LI C ✓9 V G Md 1 a :8�� �'GrT•V C ° N ➢� V °ol nn —" —ems t d� � ol` q— q ➢rq� uI u_ —✓ O�O 'a✓ pl QIrU N6U Vn VP LGO� O G U C C� N} 'd C�✓EC3 �^• - L �o q e -n CI L• ^rV V+I O� LOV` rVU O LJG ➢Jrh OI C; of = L C ✓ r ✓ C cre c O y —➢ _ ✓ C r is LL Y v 6 C — O ✓ O- C y O C � L y r Y v q V a v — n o_ L q O 9 Y q V 6 G ,✓� F 9 a ps .v i d� JO GV y�OE e• EOU J _ C V ✓ L � O N N p➢ � G o o c p d i iV 6 O✓ J G� V Cry CL vL l C v L p r O r ✓ � u � L ECp a� T' �r pp V b V O T� C Ni ii J 1 C � q N ➢� V t d� � ol` q— q �L J V N 4 L c �• F E V �'J SC G — G N y � r .°• V e e✓° ` ✓ � P C — ✓_ = — V c � s T � d � n ➢ _ C � p V �• ��L C LN =�qc I G c u .T, 0 p w t s I r � n� V O V o M uY P y c , 7 G o v E 4 C G �4 d = d _r J P 2 L C - - C c V u•I O N V V N WI I 2 _ G• V G L V_ _ Z n _ V .• 9 iJ 'J' ✓ P L u q _ LG V � c•,.r C V ✓' �° ✓ u N C d N ve EE P ➢ t � � � C G. = < G p _G u? J Yno Loq� C� V= NW_ NnWU Lr PYL Cr Y G =72 E — G. v q q V V Wn9 WYV 7p V�p2 6r N p L N t _ O s; L d o v V •� O t°r � r V —�➢ Jo — G 2 i N 2 g CV � C✓ CO v9 V V = q � 'Q rrY °aYJ � o vi. v _ ✓N c c ✓ru— _� � aJ c P=ggtt .G.c d e S V a O VO✓VO �.O' E ➢ V c G t V C V q C i YJ, ✓ d d V L°i I -q —yN Lq6 C ➢ r ^i N W d i V •c `�i9 I — �4� v ✓ ocq I nL v r L V 4O.I PN O T C L S Y �" C➢ ` g d N L � Y✓ q r C VC LGO °L> 4 — 6 — q 7)-3(4o OI cre c L —➢ -c oL— r is LL V 6 C — O ✓ O- C y O o_ Y q V 6 ,✓� G7 cr Ems- i c+yu JO GV y�OE EOU p➢ � G o o c p d i 6 O✓ J G� V C l C v L p r O r ✓ � u � L V O q U CCU L V �r pp V — � q N ➢� q— q O�O 'a✓ pl QIrU N6U Vn VP LGO� O G U C 2 _ G• V G L V_ _ Z n _ V .• 9 iJ 'J' ✓ P L u q _ LG V � c•,.r C V ✓' �° ✓ u N C d N ve EE P ➢ t � � � C G. = < G p _G u? J Yno Loq� C� V= NW_ NnWU Lr PYL Cr Y G =72 E — G. v q q V V Wn9 WYV 7p V�p2 6r N p L N t _ O s; L d o v V •� O t°r � r V —�➢ Jo — G 2 i N 2 g CV � C✓ CO v9 V V = q � 'Q rrY °aYJ � o vi. v _ ✓N c c ✓ru— _� � aJ c P=ggtt .G.c d e S V a O VO✓VO �.O' E ➢ V c G t V C V q C i YJ, ✓ d d V L°i I -q —yN Lq6 C ➢ r ^i N W d i V •c `�i9 I — �4� v ✓ ocq I nL v r L V 4O.I PN O T C L S Y �" C➢ ` g d N L � Y✓ q r C VC LGO °L> 4 — 6 — q 7)-3(4o OI i -ll I I r- C V� I `' y a J M` S C E G V >• J L ,' 4 r V =_ zz •� .°` 0 0 o i Py q ou � m =n =G `r r o• = ` Y_ G C VI `e o 0 0 N i 4i gp9Ei E =� `y - �? c• °�>. n"i S A e — u C ^+ s• N G C O ^ C ` •• 6 C g C O a0• D — � q '-r6 qA Aq VnOPO Oa �N� LL r sd �� asNLE occ °.= U^O„ 9 LLN UGI �r ,� av a °.. 'L� dod °c«>. qa cv•� �°i v _- `o a. y C T a O. N P. V V= ^J rdi n G S �- N+ G ✓ r i l' r y y L- i` n"- -09= &= a 22 u �• �I N o '��] O�� I �N US 6q � OCr O. 1 -L GV_—•• 6q 6VL Lai � L.qq N6 6L t O ICI �! ce � rnL�s eve `oar n= °.`L °� u a vvL o_ E nu cm c e P00. &2 Z. = U —C V ��.rG 7iJC v CyA LLB >Cd0'�` du �� aq° d P ad�0 on oS oq �y qo. F. c -'-�•c •"'t qa L P— F:� d o ✓ C ..Ou L L L L n d 6� O r 4 N � ° t° V` � .r 50A r ••• 6P ^—J VgGO. e1 CO2 C.5•m J 7z — a y _J -V C MI N c a n� cm r �' dN n � Lq. cP >`° "s °n vPO� L - 'c 'cOOa s Pc r° E e r'-• r ._° o ��Y�.ca n��jC ::u ^mac w °•..N � -' qqp V Nq V Y � A 6 d S> • O r A P =_ �J __ C d •, v O V � M N V S N •r 6 A g O O 6� E— L {` tD y V Q O u U O P A �I � q 1 vyy S Ca 0 L f• I � � u L _C C.J d V a� _ V _ •J U� 7 C O' ', C •' O ` NIp C •. G _ r L u C✓ C O Y J O b O t L •' C W i v T U � ^ � u' O �� d u n d y �rT u r, NC VQ.a.. w V -°�C� � 1I —,C• ..r Av d a _-z, c c A qV _ iC✓ _ yT ° V ♦ d Od r O y— ✓ V N C� 9 � C V c ` a" q � L T V d `� l u � ✓ � V r V r u d p N _ r - r_ r `_n _T n_ O O5 � .rnU ql y �' G ✓ = a d q .. r _[ > l C\ U L d d' w_ C � n• u. C' a L O u. � d p ° G V O 6 - L_ O r n Y n a ♦n 9 •w_ d C I Q U u U✓ O d q .n q I _ d =Y. Ly "_ oq ^rm ...a Iq•„ -,, u� _` p °� Vdc GA � °c OVi YC yC�r _'I CA '1 UA r I On iUE Cr. °� G d Y 00 ♦•,r .^l V 36 VO c� rQ � � ^J n r p-J rL q •w 6 n ♦n C .n � Y C O _ _ O 1 G V I✓ a � O O O O O y .° c C Tel r ✓N V � d u`y LP C L u � V� L T —_ � ✓ G V w W Ate•.•♦ r P w O l✓ T < Q ✓ A N L W V E CN � y ° Par t � ✓ L P� V AU - e.Y L L_ W N.GGa n ✓C� Y `Y a U Y u` j V y L 6 V a F Liu _\ -\ n � U 6hr -. ✓ryn= V T °7�� _ cc o ✓ n Y ° ° T 'a M° r c : a P c _ z o u u >.E7 c= � c c P A Lr F, L ✓ ` ` O n` ` <a P y. t 1 C IG `V7 G ` r A✓ CVy� Ul < G = I P cVq '�0� = r y G q� n.✓nGEM d �. ` _ u yALC q n • P I GC my GK q � � cvN nP C Y C < tvCL ✓U �v. ` j nC C•w Cy •+ �u C � � q Swb O -�rA � \ C O _W qL ba N G` TEL` T ` ✓ �= V V V LOI � G' M V P u N y 9 V✓ l> s V e hor✓ tie` n S _ K e � E E 1 G E I � Si saw Ic °- L •aaL � va a� — _-� ^~ V d l 9 �• l G ~ L C d O 9 - t n O cE v�L u n I I Pd L_V 9� rp y L ON VC - I YV Nfq .e ci l „q c d a L a O `� r i a T 6�.0 � O O• a a ai < RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION D1..YIT'IG TENTATIVE TRACT 10827 LOCATED BETWEEN HAVEN AND HERMOSA, SOUTH OF WILSON IN THE LO`W AND LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on he 11th �flperties afor198eview complete ofplthe above described filed by Pacific Lighting project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of July, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolves as follows: SECTION 1: That the Planning Commission makes in regard to Tentative Tract 10827: The proposed project is in conflict with the intent and purpose of the Development Code and Grading ze the Ordinance regarding effectsof grading by dicouraging excessivetslopes. The proposed project is inconsistent with Section 17.06.010 E.5 and 17.08.090 C.9 of the Development Code regarding grrdz ng. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract 10827 is hereby denied based on inconsistency with the provisions, intent and purpose of the Development Code and Grading Ordinance which were adopted to implement to goals, policies, and objectives of the Ge.zeral Plan. APPROVED : 1 ADO ?TED THIS 25th DAY OF JULY, 1984. the following findings 1. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAmONCA BY- Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST Rick Gome =, Deputy Secretary 11 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify tP,at the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning ConMissio:y of the - City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of July, 2984 by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: F -1 LJ Li C cI1-1 0 r ' " -� my 25> ' gg5 s °{ the Plann,n9 EGTMA,ssi°n J d Men'ber GATE rhai�man an Planner T 85_12 e2, �itY er � PERML b25 T0: Rick C,om istant Plann ITLOyP' Uaad on °minor FRp,4: Nancy Fong> Ass ENT pN0 Cosed °LL �cwith °then em'nts> BY : EhV iRUNM"R' nI.5SOCLAT� exists andcParkin Storage bu Si den ial SU T EORNAALeet to a'in9 wall ates and a Low Re Of. OJEC sou dscaP" %3' s eo a'`ecQr, loate on ntheh 5Owk 2O8 5g3- I. El J lan addition of lant locate Avenue 3 i acres Distr,coL Vineyard Develop as a d east BA Line R0 TE OESr LVe'' N oL site Plans and pROJEOT pN0 SL d: PPproval care Loot Action Re ueste ruction ° the SAte- e, p. 'oa ve eats to °5' imPrO m Road $ gene gp75 Base Line Location: Cl . '_. P. 3.1 acres 1 arcel siz- Low Residentia 0 . F. elevations ,,lice addition and _5 dulacl O ,strict `2 P Ionin °= l Ex;st,n d Oce: Church n4= oned Low Res dential S. Lan and ZOr`�+ ntia . z d t °w d how Existill Land Lse , resSLe tial; One ce; zone Surr °undin Single fi Y residential'Lessional Residential No th Sing le f mil an �# f ice al ; i0ned LOA S° - Single re s. en East Res famjly 5in91e 5 dulacl t ;ons: 2 4.Oeneral P �teZeLoident al t215ddulaci Office Prof ess0nal M' r r tit _ `ow Reside ^t, ai k2- 4 dull a) South i Low Res, dential �2_ East - Lov+ Res west ITEM E I HATE. TU: FROM: BI - SUBJECT: CI'T'Y OF R.AN'CHO CtICA,IO GA SrrAFF REPORT Jul 1984 y 25> ers of the P1'.ining commission Chairman and Viemb Rick Gomez, City Planner Nancy Fong, Assistant Plannn '�' i Proposed offs with, other minor ENVIRONMENTAL AS___ church CCRN'fiALt ASSGCIAIES - lot improvements, feet to an existing ,king o building on square retaining wall and pa landscaping, hit ates and a ssto `� ' Residential and additions of land' located in the _ of Base 3.1 acre` of the south side Development District located on AN 208- 593 -08. Line Road and east of Vineyard Avenue - I. P�JECT AND SITE 'DESCRIPTION: ® A. Action Re�estad: APF roval of site Plans and elevations a office addition n �--• Construction of a 625 square foot S. Pur ose- general improvem _ ents �o the Sit'- C, Lo_ tio- -: 9075 Base Line Read D. Parcel 3.1 acres l r) E. Exi� 7Vr 11 F. G. Low Residential Distract (2_4 du a_ «in Land Use* Church Exis Su*roundin L- -nd Use ands sidential; zoned Low Residertia1 North - Single fani y t zoned Law Residential Single family residentia zoned Low South _ Single family residential, off :ce; East Residential and Office Professional West Single family residential; zoned Low Residential General Piles DeL�Rzsiazntial (2 -4 dulac) N. 4 du /ac) roject �t- horth - ow Residential (2-4 dulac) South „ 4 du /ac); Office Professional _ Loy Res _dential (2- East - L,jw Residential %--4 du lac) West - Low Residential (2- ITEM E PLANNING COAMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit P34- 12!Cernwall Associates July 25, 19884 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: Tne site is fully developed with a church, parking areas, landscaping and street improvements. The church has facilities that include a sanctuary, meeting hall, classrooms and office area. J. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code permits expanz ion of church facilities subject to a Conditional Use Permit and in accordance with setback requirements. II. ANALYSIS: A. Generai: The proposed addition is located at the west side of the church on an existing concrete pad. The addition is to provide needed office space and meeting room for The existing congregation and staff. Also, the applicant has proposed to improve the si.e by including the following: interior remodeling and reconstruction of 13W square feet on the west side of the church, re- roofing the entire church, re- paving the west parking lot, and the installation of a 5 -foot high retaining wall at the rear property line. For security purposes, due to past burgla ;ies, the applicant is proposing to install security gates (see Exhibit "G ") at the three driveways on Base Line Road. These gates will be flanked by brick walls approximately 4 -feet high, to matcrs the existing church brick exterior. In addition, a 250 square foot storage building will be constructed at the rc?r parking lot (see Exhibit "C "). Although th_ proposed storage ruilding will take up three parking spaces, the site still has more than the required parking spaces for the church facility. B. Design Review Corsaittee: The Committee recommended approval of the p-oject subject to t he following: 1. All building materials shall match with existing churct.. 2. All trees, landscaping and ground cover that will be remov--d due to the construction of a new retaining wall shall be replaced. 3. Proposed storage building located at the south Property line sl,all have architectural treatments that match with existing church and shall provide contiguous landscaping. The applicant has agreed to these requirements, as shown on the attached exhibits. 0 C-;�- L3 .J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 84 -12 /Cornwall Associates July 25, 1984 Paae 3 C. Development Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project and determined that, with the recommended : onditions of approval, this project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. Conditions of approval are provided in the attached Resolution for your consideration,. D. Grading Co-mittee: The Committee has approved the c -inceptual grading plan subject to submittal and approval of a final grading plan. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the General Plan and t e eve opment Code regulations. The proposed use, 'Cogether with the recommended Condition- of Approval, will not be detrimental to the public health or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daisy P,eport newspaper, the property p•sted, and notices sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all material and input regarding this project_ If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for findings and Conditians of Approval, adoption of the attached 0soiution would be appropriate. Resr, fully submitted, Rick Go City P1 Attach-m=ents: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Resolut "An "Ba _ aCa — ur _ arm _ "Fa - aGa - 04a _ aim _ ion of Location Man Site Pla., Illustrative Site Plan Elevations Mainage Plan Floor Plan Roof Plan & Securicy Gate Storage Buildings Retaining Wall Design Approval with Conditions 4r-3 I� H I� tl 4 a � nnvn.'so N'umiM'� ��i% � W!tJ'7J.,��I ; ,• "CON—JILTMl7'IC) 7Htp^,inn m::'n�-'•'^��?� ; �vo4"�O � •�'i 'iiiY iS `t ;� i � iii ) i ,� •I , CT all CIO J� __!_� ! ;n I., r 1 v i a L L. O t ��_ �•.^�w�! us �O�.r.O ` � ��i QtlTM �7t1p}1T:l� V OL TACwfY 9A `TiM: l L } G -(V :i I 0 �i r F_- 11 El Li Lj —^ ,u>oappm 5 7ma'cfa c,nM r^- -nm (, to N 9 h i c O jj�Y•j �I r -- n 11 k - 1 Q Z r m irurm wwrx.� -_ aim �._. •._�. �. 1 L7 APn �I arto lna aemn� •�noa�m 3 w nvawaY a.n .aacc. ' 9f 5 I� F W La F T O U 0 O o� z J Im. r i i1 I, I' I` V I I� '�Ul — n'fv r�+r+rvna �1IS� 52;DI DMl1J0 DOS Vn -�' == _'^ •.� - Ij C? ucars { { awn ti.omn •w+,n o+�xpo ON:Qaf17 QdtM •r.+o *r7m w +alw.nr en .a�ooD I -� ' VD U✓(VS }J{�-jj•jiu 1111 .i� 7 iii �iN{ ti{ � ;�. s �= � j)r 4r 9 F F U 0 /Y� r a WE � pard, ,-pos r- ti{ � ;�. s �= � j)r 4r 9 F F U 0 /Y� r a , o Oe•,ss W t 7U1 1•MU �+oO_J �•i d !� I T I O1 �lpy,q ba. 4lVp. 1 L 1 II i ^I 11 t� 111 i ~ o Oe•,ss W t 7U1 1•MU �+oO_J i d !� I T I O1 �lpy,q ba. 4lVp. I u, Ell I I - sr. L^• , L_ _ u 1 I S� y 'r �! r iv I i.:.7 U F V O U > O r�rll L_ U� LI E t'j d !� I I i.:.7 U F V O U > O r�rll L_ U� LI E � sa; -- � & Al�V ���� .A oMQiolo J..:M •� pllppR{1) Oi I�OP�•• a,n �Jr=,00• I' to 0 U � 3 r 0 :r' a C U o U `' In szunGww. sa�oaosc� _" � .- i Mal= O3 l]OP.Ip Qt.. YTtgO� ! L 10. .•9 �11� � � II � I••� i ;T iii � © '•� II—� � �� � 2 1 i !�I dill ' V � I� jj a'�• � 1 Z` n l� 9 a 1 Y 1 c:v E t� F F F r O O r ®� avcw4'+o IN'�oW� 7111 ^� 51 N1'r0 ^ =n �YL� T Iv.�oaau IDAN110 I ==•ir .w.eam -.+•+� (7 In I _ ,,,�I �� �nmana I' `� oN�nlma OnM :ewonvrnv fI oa + -- on .ma�vo• E ►�i i i a rl1 s � a. e. /3 i r �•� 0 'r I� �J Lq J DO L c. RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO t.UCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE ,'•ER.'4ITNO. 81 -12 FOR A 625 SQUARE FOOT ADDITIGN TO A CHURCH LOCATED AT 9075 BASE LINE ROAD IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, On the 7th day of June, 1984, a complete application was filed by Cornwall Associates for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of duly, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Corc:ission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the pruposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the Public health, safety, or welfare, or materially i4jurious to properties or improv ?ments in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -12 is approved subject the ;ollowing conditions: P= ANXiNG DIVISION: 1. Install landscaping per City standards or street side of the new wall along right -of -way on Agate Street. 2. Special treatment shall be provided for the wails flanking driveways such as trim cap, pillars, landscaping, etc. 3. All building materizls shall mach the existing church. - 4. All trees landscaping a�ad , ,'ound cover t: %at will be removed due to construction of a new retaining wall shall be replaced. /y Resolution No. Page 2 5. Roof materials shall have heavy architectural style shingles to create shadow lines. Samples shall be submitted for approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 6. The proposed storage building located at the south property line shall have architectural treatments that match with the existing church and shall be relieved by landscaping. 7. All security gates shall be flanked by brick walls a maximum of four (4) feet high and shall match the existing church brick exterior. 8. The proposed ribbon gutter shall be moved east or west of centerline of the drive to the satisfaction of the Building Official. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25th DAY OF JULY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. S *_out, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy _e�tary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of July, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: U 0 . O Z u U Q� .O d 11 El � V L^ T✓L l -y a ynyvy— Vc a q T _N ✓L!' ym PV E T C V✓ _� U qc ^Y -�rac ion° d E r n V '� O'✓ C U^ 0 9 2�� q O d T✓ L. C ✓ ✓ -' OC.V..d a�rrS_O F ✓ x�� O L✓ n O O U q 9 N r Y J✓ L n P V oE`L✓ Looc _ n'ayjyNU �O✓ q 9 O✓ a L O V N q ° � ✓ _ _ NV L � L � « qo «c =o4au_ °OQ -V <N✓� r _�r`b —caa✓ n •� q at W H .Z. O > N 0 0 c j V {` C C � Z N 6 G t u t O L V N C J y O a q v o vL `y'O V a O N L O C 6 Q C L q O,✓ C 7 h V V V p T O V r ✓CN ^V s'cc� u T C G• L y ✓ O ✓ �L d o > C G N CC O V ✓ PL d C P O O v C U a r d•q -LTV G6 V"'✓ err <� C C — N ¢• d€iNa y d` Lcd C N O q ? Lo >o ✓ 6 T q nyV o� c= E c r C < 6 P < ✓ «d� y OL? `n 1I ✓` qYl P I Y om° e C L ✓ Y V � P N V U CLZ ML NL P «✓6 r n n E P ., o° P ✓n -SOP -Orr c nLOc p 90q ��YL Min N F ` N i c° u --7— = c « = c c e c o n ' r v r✓ n— o u - T v.- Y_''1 L _may mc.�,. _ u _ ✓ d ✓� L _ �a � M^ M C F p q C Ii L� L N om^ 9 E I -7 =NU IV _ N� qs L— �`vr o LOQ° '_ _ E q ✓ L « U ^r EO =U,IO d P nV TQirN L LU C « ✓ r P C V✓ ✓1 _p C<iL ^O✓ yn�p y � O r rp<E6 r' GTNE 60em �c DYV.OV 6�¢C1Ln �H tS vv O_ C O -d✓ P✓ l q_ <« 0 0 I ✓ 00 NOO «_E� O �w0 O � F Pq4 aq n�riodr q f . L O L � _ i N O✓ ✓ V O Jp d N c ui Y O N >VV V d � O L q r b a a °✓ t o H� v u 6 o" + r r ✓ S O V C V° EO ✓_ Q JCrL < ✓.EGr -u C �i CL O C G �..r00 _ ✓ y� � �- ¢ r r- C_GVL T9 Z N P O ,O Y y Y C qC y q Cat J Ov� O LCyn.r V r h 6 _ L � M� F P i✓ N N i6y� =7; yY N C xN Nz °i' W N v 2 O � r �H N 0 Z V G O i �� Ta O p- �°`wi4 r V — O L E u« b r r N L rv�N L _ V C ` C' l O c r � 6 ==�ov r rn- c q ,oNG^ qc r C � O d V r q C C ✓ a G u L p y C C 6 V b PO Ta T .a —E V G c`ri c: "a0 b _O C T 9 � V ✓ �c°a r Tr aN d aLn ° o«� cc •L C✓ O= s w V- a� pa NEE „ rrC.rr rqH V r OO C =w OO�aV`t'sr r L VJ C - O r.L�LO� L� V TC aC b Q a L b a G L N r V O« N r E 7 C ✓ v N q G V O C _a ^• V N L% S V c C V Q W N pr =c�T_a _ b cir dG✓ gagE LL V PL N wC tr L qq� Tq V rr V C.. N C a J O V V r N C C Puiw ov.°. Ci — TG9 P OI a ✓ C aor a �o✓ �G G ✓ — '^ C T 9a •p ✓ r V L q E cOO L aC� q7q Y •_+ o .Le c t _ O q p ✓ O R� r L Cd C y C - L ✓ n° w U a t U ✓ .L..Er.a L j ✓C ` drNO O c C° n C 9 r f.Yi t p M V Y q r p w C r Y r u _ C OC« qa LdCc C E E r a c — W -'i N n Q � I f V u L L p V 9 C M L a C C q- _ r p > O N C q d= c O « q P t��-• CC r«id NTp C.+G^ is rvN q °C •C q i V c V U q= r P�V Cirp LC9E 6>.60 t q d > q q N C gL r C N V L q✓° `� ct r p6N ✓_> ✓VrN OOCO�J VyV =q d T q U r t C O � Y <� j^ �_ p a — F _ r✓ N ` N C N✓ E q N r L c C S C aVV L �j O am�`` E r q C✓ y C_ a r— q V✓ w j g N .� Q C✓ Y LC. � •J` P O ✓ c i r y � c �_ q C O N`' O N V.—a 2;V r G '07 —_ q ✓.°. iaa iq .«.. � =ae+oa .°o�qe a c° .P °c V w L O O C l � r✓ r O q N ..Oi N O C N q y C .0 V q E 4 2 6 r O q 0 L L L_ V Y O ✓ .°r. V r C C N V y C C V✓ C P V V V N p PC ` S C 07 N L Q . J �.ri c >nr �a0 C•.'L C Cq gt.CC tV .•N OLV CVWC O 4 T� O r u C C V — C C C L q q G L n. _• {uj O Me. Loa qL n q Pv_� N -r. c.c _G <c °Z = ca.°• ruq -- C v r - - TSB �a P� ^ =€ - _• � � VaC� VaV V a� 6L rLC NS✓ Pu !.^..QCrrLS C. u'a _ r� r .°.. u .: vc_'o'. fib` = v: ° u °_ =na e 4 a `= .vO cco —c c�_. - -q °� cn°`— c cq i.ov _O E YC 5 u �q _a LgccCV >Vm —rr roq CqC a 4> rV E Lr a4 eO «Vi 'LO V'. Nr e � v° r- pa > ov :i• o 0 0 r p �LNO 6 -Na V 6u -..0 m a O ' r i7 TO O T r J = q ? r �r c' p � n y y p c « QE Y C O Yi q r � e t V w LVr L L C O q qpL wi u o 0 _Y V L G � q p — ✓ V w 4 C V C � t•^E: q d C.r C O O V C FO p= CLL O. _qNW wa v T e Y d C M _ y 6E�<G �I E N 0 .. c °6 � a.cl ° n� Mo oar✓ c i �`a � MV u •I �.D.. q � V a e O b -' y o J' C d C E?o� _ V' d O P L oc:.0 �v ngno ' c_•c' 'L.mN^ -`✓°�: q = •^ v I n L ^u E_l7T eP�c ogou ,«°( 1 q L p r Yp J .L L V «u q V�L b G q Y .V zc q i° -q as c oo� c �q4 uq =_ I o o ✓qU r rq "qO V✓V ° q_ _ s ^Yq C V C N✓ ir7� O�a� T-' °'a «9°'n z_G ° ✓b � � n 'c= u n ^^ i °uq `` ndw oa.✓ cv q c azgd Jl a'a coq o �~ d C .:] P6C O DN « � �C VY T d'S q— ✓ i T9C La E 9cyq ^✓ qw ° C •�. ` Y q w O G V N 2^ �j E ..a. dVl V q O Tv a 'y 0 N N _ v G g .o ra �wca c_o ^r �, �VLL «L ^JC u..giW w2��W r q ✓ q VOigLi q PqG q^ 4V�iN ala 6e =oL 4adi X00 nri. ^ � ✓..� q =G"' dnV r �?b V✓ N O= dC L _ V_VCa -C6 PO Gan _ p TOOC Oa qiq 2]Og0 Pp !'nV ^O Y G Vr O q Ewe �« y PG q N N O. ✓a0'✓ aC �b0 Ly w• N G q P °� q r a° O 6� O ± C r d L t r✓ N T✓ E L r a a �r qr 99 idL> � y=�N 1t� r0 q L Q N q L Q PL QcLCEC q O^ O O« y C V E L r• d _� y O Ja. Oyr q✓ DI q^ na✓i .�. .r c+ � « O Oy9q � L✓ yU «✓ v _ E L _ G V� q _ O G q M r y r V O V ° p o l O r OY 9 r Q ` ^ C d L J L V p a q j �' r v 1 69✓` «✓ Vr0 6 L Wra. ✓q� qua V a `•'J ". D O p✓ q ^ C P._ « q N� W 2) N .J r L G_ = y y O i 0000 =0 - w�G Vr C' CTL q C rG Gw CGC..O C.nVT a rI19 y0 ✓ ` O Q v �q u a cvio ° o � c'c'vi= E J; ocq+ a ✓'O V `N J ✓ z ^ aD C 9 O l e• 1 q O� u. � ..J i 2 b r O V .b L l dI V 9 Pt.. w r O✓ C. -"' u G �O _ I Y a] L S. �r.0✓Jgr 0� L✓ y C C �ON r✓ b V �L q V q q G V O C C .-. =9 tOp S'q ✓O� iLI rw �pN ._ LwOC� 1] iu.lgl Er tir <7 Cu 6D �O q p� wY aC G9 rwNw =P a « ti CI7 Va Opt N� «9M 6anr _ w �`° l 2an0 ani - C N n 0 V 4 0 y 0 u QJ CT O L !Z V -Lr d >. V C O O � _N ✓— O � E 2 L H V L M ` O d � — o J V � L U te a• v� C y V — _ O J V- y � _ � c4" r•J V E p ¢ c O' — V G r q O _ 2L°s�r M C'V•Tr4 =c Ec �` � ii.-o = C)o L O `—J C ar•C 1 NjiC •-L r —V YO r .e �vnv V __ V 3 4 C b q'�L - - >� �O WV a4i -�— wt_ r>' O rTr -i 2OgCp Y'EV �' - •4.JWL °J6arrN =r.s� ` 974- =o .ni o0 99 V ±� 6�e�0 N J O. YL tOV WN9 WVV 7p V ° cO rciV °npi ipa�U _ C�MLO =O G9 V5 4' PC e n V r C VO• q r nqq N _ V -Lr d >. V C O O � _N ✓— O � E 2 L H V L M ` O d � — o J V � c4" L L O `—J C ar•C 1 NjiC •-L r —V YO r .e �vnv V __ q'�L - - >� �O WV a4i -�— wt_ r>' O rTr -i 2OgCp Y'EV =r.s� ` 974- =o .ni WV PO+O .w. C `C_ cO rciV °npi ipa�U _ C�MLO =O G9 V5 4' PC LVO— n V r C VO• q r nqq r a v M V L C N io o Y q r a " ry i a4 n n� a q — c u G� `o r N N L < r 0 Ll rI 1 ' •� U V V p ' T 1, ' •' 1 � �r¢� SN ' ' � 6 � M�rvC ��N t �V L I S T^ � 9 n �r a Cr y r l E � •' O v„ Q V L c c �o � � � °u° Ldp "�' •`"' �vao �'_ � � ^) V i u a� � •" N V N S = _ d q O � O= i uri c � O d; D. Y d ` Y� C T _•° _ a � NEO : dsu v c r r� � o •� o° Y 2 y •°"+a 2 -Li. c Y V j Y N y C y u 2 O^ "N. Z •-'j noG v_ 1111 ^c Vd �^ •T_ aei�c_.t �°O .^.�� N� yi ryjTp PY °" VG 060.4 y° w9` Cr CII O•" _u C� U 1 4 V N cm O I 1 r O N r NVl N co c°p p d 4 E ... >.Cp LcVI✓ =�._dE �V� LN °_'E P E It °� W m��Ci O. Y V �o� °O yN M as ? a,•2_ •� S N° � �� c C p NYC E L Y q °ms C V °Ndq V u..y _t yuy GVVWd = V P pL G L O v O °C.e� C4�P yY� YUVT V d oV_V LN Ora t10�9 °�•... ��� C Eq = V L = =c+. cp° ° 42T7 Ee a ^ci �•p GVV - Ia d N F V OJ/ NY9Nr t G On -E�•l WC]G V GO V VOP9 PmL ° N bM • • • N � px tPV h•�• ! S a Y p V g O •I ^I I I �. � od� [ J i.r d ✓ a � Oaay ✓ �� y q C; —_ N �+_ r2 _ 'e °ec —✓.� .cod Lq —__�� o P DyY L_> N yC Yq0 rd y9 ]1 p er PC CY. V O C�f..f p .+ t ` -d✓ L v `y a2 d J f£ V ,r - S✓ y. -^ P �` 2 L O a U ` L ad W dq °� r Y2 YvN - do L 'E- u " 4 1 ✓4✓ 9 N � u• w � x ° VC 6 .5iL °✓ -iVE N q x� OLV V OV q P E Y T V v a yI = q ° ✓° C t N d � qa L� V L A O 6 N° V' VI V`O Q ✓ VV7 O, r = OJN 6S V, U �« ✓ N ° V r C P r q 2 ,. C V N N r L 9 W d_ N C e m P> O OL ° d V y aFi r c_ y N aCi � q � � 2 rV. � •Vi r m` —� y 6. r V G O 7 C` r L L V 2 0. 4° O C L Y C � Y 0 y ✓ U O q `2 r,r Q CN q r r ,On Z p N N d Ix � —o � �`:� mss. = ° _ r �E•`o� «u .0 e 2 �rL =_ •J O� Ni, J r G r ✓qN NL�gP NY�LV cN N ° az L L 24L tC�V q4' - d a Zoe e O C. V C' N O. G- ✓ � V O �� � � ✓r O. -. J = ��� d�N`C _ L?� dig v QO p ✓ L O �q v L' ZO N..Z YPC� N N _ L' Y V � � Y �• 2 q' ^ C p W E C6 d I C' Wit•... >> °� q 9 q y_ _> _ C= N � v 2 � 2✓r.L pa ✓ yr` ✓P�cY C z, C' C r L N L FC✓ _ JS O'r � 9 � ✓ 1 N qG0 � ^^p y. q L .L..« I �?f• 7L� q C L r V O O.q V{J C C d✓ U u �OVO g T d G q NV �� s C d C E ieV V1 uu 4. 6 G y J`Ly Y_ .tn yl0✓ ✓L e 1 d a r o Y � u c� r •0 0 s •. �E u= F �• r c I I �I I V ' V C C [ SW 1 O t G 4_ �c n M o of P A G c � � q n. P•d) vac u d o -oy � c 16rca <od W a eI 1 n ^ L a O •..r O A •�_ �_ 7 �/ V C O' n ° d O � d u L •n 2 ^ L ^c A V� G TC r L_ G u d b� E q 7 d M e o E •„ � _ b _ c � c • rz E � v` TV qd �d Q y V. CiC 4 ° ^O AV•ii � � ^ N� •1 ^• • b ^� rI N� m1P�yj1 ^� V '�� � 51 V 1 Y ^� C 1 n 0 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAA1ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 25, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission F.RO'f: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: E VIRO . 111 ML ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDME A - i9th STREET CORRIDOR STUDY LAND USE AMENDMi amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map to m land use designations for certain properties Within the 19th Street Corridor study area. 84 -C2- S - An ify the located I. BACKGROUND: This report provides information and analysis on six u specific sites selected for consideration by the Planning Commission for General Plan Land Use Amendments in conjunction with the 19th Street Corridor Study. Where the Planning Commission determines that an alternative land use designation is appropriate, a second public hearing will be necessary to consider a corresponding Development District Amendment, complete the environmental analysis, and finalize the decision on the General Plan Amendments. The following sections describe each of the sites and provi0e a series of land use alternatives with staff analysis, and the mp below indicates the six areas under consideration. � STUDY AREA BOUNDARY ==== 19 th ST. SCALE^ ' law' NORTH ITEM F a S GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -02 19th Street Corridor Land Use Amendments Page 2 II. SITE NUMBER ONE (i): A. Location: West side of Beryl Street, south of Hamilton Street - AP— 07- 032 -20, 21, and 22. B. Parcel S4ze: 6.78 acres C. Existing Zoning: LM (4 -8 du /ac) D. Existing Land Use: Vacant E. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North: ing a fame y subdivision; zoned L (2 -4 du /ac) South: Existing single family homes, Small lot single family detached subdivision under construction; zoned LM (4- 8 du/ac) East: Vacant; zoned L (2 -4 du /ac) West: Existing single family subdivision; zoned L (2 -4 du /ac) F. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) North: Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South: Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) East: Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) West: Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) G. Analvsis: Considering the character of the surrounding neig born od, the Commission has two basic options wih regard to the land use designation on this site: 1. Maintain the current Low - Medium designation; and, 2. Reduce the density on the site to Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). Considering adjacent existing and planned development, this property should clearly be developed with single family detached homes. At issue is the question of what is the most appropriate lot size. As the Commission is aware, the "L" district requires a minimum average lot size of 8,000 square feet. The Basic Standards of the "LM" district establish a 6,000 square foot minimum average lot size, whereas under the Optional Standards, lot size is not regulated but common open space is required. Staff analysis of the sites indicate that a maximum of 27 homes could be built under the "L" district standards and about 36 homes under the basic "LM" standards. The subdivision currently under construction to the south was approved under the Optional Design Standards and has an average lot size of approximately 3500 square feet (7.48 units per. acre). El L J E GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -02 19th Street Corridor Land use Amendments Page 3 The existing single family subdivisions to the north and west have typical lot sizes of approximately 7200 square feet. Although a future street connection to this property is provided from the north, the orientation of future development on this site will more closely associate with the developing neighborhood to toe south because of the long common frontage along Mignonette Street. — __— _--- __-- _- -c�vnl I Gin�amil Tract Tlc w Gomm. Condommlums ` L Single E alPi cC Family 19tn L V�a Cant L I I� SI L ® $i to Famly 7rac G�•_�JJ Vacan: i L YaCa�.t L7� � I iVaJ(Ci MOKaTy i all W! \! n I—t IY1'i y t0 � TIT ! J� �v Z�f 3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -02 19th Street Corridor Land Use Amendments Page 4 III. SITE NUMBER TWO (2): A. Location: Southwest corner of 19th Street and Beryl Street - APN 20 - 461 -61 through 65. B. Parcel Size: 5.01 acres C. Existino Zoning: Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) D. Existing Land Use: Three single family homes on ;eparate lots E. Surroundino Land Use and Zoning: North: Church, Sunscape Condominiums; zoned MH (14 -24 du /ac) South: Single family subdivision; zoned L (2 -4 du /ac) East: Church; zoned L (2 -4 du /ac) West: Single family subdivision; zoned L (2 -4 du /ac) F. General Plan Designations: Project Site: Low Residential North: Medium High Resident South: Low Residential (2 -4 East: Low Residential (2 -4 West: Low Residential (2 -4 (2 -4 du /ac) ial (14 -24 du /ac) du /ac) du /ac) du /ac) G. Analysis: As with the previous site, two land use alternatives are suggested: 1. No charge to the current Low density designation; and, 2. Revise the land use category to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). This property has been designated Low Residential since before the City was incorporated. Development of the property will not likely occur for some time considering the fragmented lot pattern and the fact that three homes currently exist on the site. If the property were to be consolidated, it could easily be developed under either the "L" or "LM" district standards without adversely affecting the surrounding neighborhood. This is in part attributable to the fact that no through street connections are provided to the existing single family tracts to the south and west, and the project would have to be deveioped with access directly off of 19th Street or Beryl Street. Ano,her factor to consider is the intensity of development oro the north side of 19th Street, and traffic volumes on 19th Stree ±. �1_q 11 E TENTH NC Condominiums MH SaIeFa t Vacant tingle Family Tract l Single E Family = L = L Vacant NORTH CITY o"' ITE%I: RANI C O CLCANI JON A TITLE: SrTE nb z PLANNING DIVbg0N E \Timm — SCALE= --- � -5 STRECT J ,U «I� W CI " •> S BjF—CT PROPER Ti Y I<6 ^c 0, 61 Pp L 19 cl 6� N 220 461 p ` 1f9_ I]O 131n ID2„_I3 NORTH CITY o"' ITE%I: RANI C O CLCANI JON A TITLE: SrTE nb z PLANNING DIVbg0N E \Timm — SCALE= --- � -5 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -02 19th Street Corridor Land Use Amendments Page 5 IV. SITE NUMBER THREE (3)_ A. Location: Northwest corner of 19th Street and Beryl Street - AP— N 20T- X21 -08 B. Parcel Size: 4.96 acres C. Existing Zoninq: MH (14 -24 du /ac) D. Existina Land Use: Existing church site, partially vacant E. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: L (2 -4 du /ac) but within the North Vacant property; zoned South: Foothill Freeway Corridor Single family homes; zoned Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East: Single family homes, single family subdivisl�;7 . (2 Beryl - Heilman Charnel; zoned Low Residential -4 du /ac) West: Sunscape Condominiums; zoned MH (14 -24 du /ac) F. General Plan Designations: Project Site: Medium High Residential. (14 -24 du /ac) North: Foothill Freeway Corridor South: Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East: Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) West: Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) G. Anal sis- Two options are suggested relative to the land use esignation on this site: 1. Maintain the current Medium -High designation; and, 2. Lower the permitted density to Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac). As indicated above, a church building exists on this property. The building is the first in a series the church intends to build according to the master plan approved in 1979. The existing building is designed as a multi - purpose structure and the future sanctuary is to be built directly to the north. In the event the church decides not to build, the property could be subdivided and the remaining land developed as residential. If this occurs the project design must be sensitive to the abutting existing MH development and the single family homes on the east side of Beryl. The vacant portion of the site is approximately three acres and access would be provided from Beryl Street. If the property was developed toward the high end of the current MH District, the small ize of the site could present a signi`icant constraint in tern. of providing an appropriate design. '"f0 E 11 11 JBJECT PROPERTY ® Sing,. Family l ract o NC ,.. Comm. Condominiums L i Single fft Family 19th t [ _ I I � Vacant L i 1 f Si le Famil liras, L Vacant Vacant L. --� , 1 hS — k. -''� f ./" SUBJECT PROPERTY G�3✓l:b�S s_;r.: _: -_..— � °tea f • -L -��• 1M 1M 1 .� - - 5 C - •w{1CCwIw 1 � V I � J � YrC�attr CITY Or ITL•NI =� RANCHO CUCk't'I©.NGA TITLE: _ -SM ,yo _ z PLANNING DIVISION E \iilr-IT: — SCALE-.–f--- 5 � NORTH GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -02 19th Street Corridor Land Use Amendments Page 6 V. SITE ?LUMBER FOUR (4): A. Location: North side of 19th Street, between Amethyst Street and Archibald Av,.nue - APN 202 - 101 -07, 21, 22. B. Parcel Size: 17.65 acres C. Existinq Zonina: MH (14 -24 du /ac), OP (Office Professional) D. Existinq Land Use: One single family home exists in the center of the site and a Water District well exists on Parcel 7 approximately 300 feet from Amethyst. E. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning: North: Vacant Land and Citrus Orchard; zoned L (2 -4 du /ac), but within the Foothill Freeway Corridor South: Single family homes and single family subdivision; zoned 1. (2 -4 du /ac), small lot subdivision; zoned U•; (4 -8 du /ac) East: Neighborhood shopping center; zoned NC (Neighborhood Commercial) West: Office Building; zoned OP (Office Professional); Post is Office and Fire District Office; zoned MH (Medium High Residential; Retirement Home and Vacant Land; zoned M (8 -14 du /ac) F. General Plan Desi nations: Project Site: Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac), Office North: Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South: Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac), Low Medium Residential: 0-8 du /ac) East: Neighborhood Commercial West: Office, Medium Hiah Residential (14 -24 du /ac), Medium Residential (4-14-du/ac) G. Anal�sis�: When the City incorporated in 1977, this property was A �5 (Limited Agriculture). A zone change to AP (Administrative Professional) was granted for the three acres at the corner of 19th and Archibald in 1979 as a result of a development proposal. The remainder of the property was designated Mixed Use and High Residential (15 -30 du /ac) in February 1.979 when the Interim General Plan was adopted. When the current General Plan was adopted in April 1981, the 3 acre site at the intersection of 19th and Archibald remained Office and the remainder of the site designated Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac). The significant factors which entered into the decision for higher density included the fact 19 �J GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -02 19th Street Corridor Land Use Amendments Page 7 that the site is adjacent to the future Foothill Freeway and a future off -ramp, proximity to a neighborhood shopping center, and future availability of public transit along two major trave' corridors through the City. A concern which was not addressed, however, was the proximity of the single `amily homes on the south side of 19th Street across from the project. With regard to the land use designations on this site, there are six options as follows: 1. Maintain current designations of Medium High and Office 2. Maintain office designation with revision to Medium Residential on remaining land. i. Maintain Office designation with Low - Medium Residential on remaining land. LI The Low - Medium designation on this property would require development which is consistent with the current intensity of the area. Over time, however, as the area intensifies and the freeway is constructed this may not hold true and if the property remains vacant, pressures to develop a higher density project will exist. Regardless of the product type, however, the project design will be the most significant factor as to whether or not the project is compatible with the area. Also, if the Commission chooses to maintain the Office designation at the intersection, it is suggested that a master plan be required for the entire site to provide for integrated development and enhance the compatibility of the office and residential uses. ,I _ 4 4. Redesignate all parcels Low - Medium ® 5. Redesignate all parcels Medium LI The Low - Medium designation on this property would require development which is consistent with the current intensity of the area. Over time, however, as the area intensifies and the freeway is constructed this may not hold true and if the property remains vacant, pressures to develop a higher density project will exist. Regardless of the product type, however, the project design will be the most significant factor as to whether or not the project is compatible with the area. Also, if the Commission chooses to maintain the Office designation at the intersection, it is suggested that a master plan be required for the entire site to provide for integrated development and enhance the compatibility of the office and residential uses. ,I _ 4 •VaCa:17 Family r_ Tract SF M S.F. fJl M 5av FM L Vacant JPO* 92597' ' pp � Feaf'v!y 7�rac L SFT. I MOND L L L �L f2C M) ul I ,'yr'� V i �• _ ny^ I, Op. I-rrel Par�2 .Cjl I 1. _ S L YV Pµ.'1257:TF H. X01 �� 27 .• +. r2 71 r .� y I .511Z O SOJY fl l� 10�•••y G t�� •Si nC Yrt 7 . Q var fD 47 - � sfg� i SUBJECT PROPERTY'. I! 1 I "r 4 5 NORTH CITY OF [TEN 1: _4g Aa4 -o7- A - 19 m ST STUr7f RAMHO CUC3ixIO -NGA TrFLE: PLANNING DIVISIONT E.XHIBFr- SCALE: �'to GENERAL PLAN AMENOMEivT "04 -02 19th Street Corridor Land Use Amendments N ge 8 VI. SITE NUMBER FIVE- (5) A. Location: North side of 19th Street from Ramona to Hermosa Avenue - APN 202- 17; - -25, 26, 31, 32, 35, 42, 58, 59, 60, 61. B. Parcel Size: Approximately 27.8 acres C. Existing Zoning: Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) D. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Single family home, vacant propery; zoned L (2 -4 du /ac) but within the Foothill Freeway Corridor South: Single family subdivisions; zoned L (2 -4 du /ac) East: Single family homes; zoned L (2 -4 du /ac); vacant property; zoned LM (4 -8 du /ac) and OP (office Professional) West: Existing apartments; zoned MH (14 du /ac) E. General Pian Designations: Project Site: Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) North: Foothill Freeway Corridor South: Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East: Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac), Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac), Office West: Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) F. Analysis: As tke Commission is aware, three tentative tract maps are approved on this site. Densities at the higher end of the Medium Residential range, as with TT 11853, are appropriate at the west end of the site adjacent to the existing MH apartment project, while a transition to lower density should occur further to the east. A church occupies the center portion of the subject property and has an approved master plan to cover a large portion of their property. Tentative Tracts 11625 and 11781 on the east portions of the site are approved with a density of approximately 13 units per acre and will expire in early 1985 if not recorded. The land use alternatives for this site include: 1. No revision; or, 2. Revise all or a portion of the site to Low - Medium Residential. It should be pointed out that the General Plan Medium Density range 14 -14 du /ac) differs from the Development Code. Either the LM (4 -8 du /ac) or M (8 -14 du /ac) Development Districts would be consistent with the General Plan. Therefore, an appropriate transition to a lower density eastward could be accomplished with a Development District Amendment. However, a change to Low- Medium on the eastern portion of the site would make Tentative Tracts 11625 and 11781 (Roberts) nonconforming. J -1a 11 11 C 1 I /I :1 1� 'I .� � YAA�Y � s AYYYYY�A s AM -iIL I ti .\t{tl \YA O tYIWY YYY \eMM \'VA 1 11 -I 1 j-SUBJEC i PROPERTY- - 0 CITE' OF ITEM: 11-� RANCHO CUCXi\'IO.NL A TFT :. PL-VNNl 1. \G DINISION EXHIBIT. - SCALE- - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 34 -02 19th Street Corridor Land Use Amendments Page 9 VII. SITE NUMBER SIX (6) U A. Location: Northeast corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue - APN 2-OT-T91-13, 14, 23. B. Parcel Size: 11.23 acres C. Exist ing: Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac), OP Office Professional) D. Surrounding Land Uses and Zoninq: orth: single fa-nily comes; zoned L (2 -4 du /ac) South: Single family homes; zoned L (2 -4 du /ac) East: Single family subdivision; zoned L (2 -4 du /ac) West: Vacant property with two approved residential tracts; zoned Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) E. General Plan Designations- Project Site: Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac), Office North: Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South: Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East: Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) West: Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) Analvsis: This property was designated as R -1 when the City incorporated and the designation was turned to Fixed Use on the Interim General Plan approved in 1979. Also approved in 1979 was a zone change to office for the southerly half of this site at the intersection of Hermosa and 19th. When the General Plan was adopted in 1981 this portion of the site remained as Office and the north half of the site was designated as Law- i+iedium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). Major determining factors to consider regarding this property are the approved condominium projects on the west side of Hermosa, and the surrounding single family homes and subdivision east of Hermosa. The alternatives for this site are as follows: I. Maintain current Low - Medium 2. Revise Office portion, to Low - Medium 3. Redesignate the entire site Low Residential 4. Revise Low - Medium portion to Low Residential A Low Residential designation on this site would be clearly consistent with the existing adjacent development. A typical single family subdivision could be accommodated with the extension of one or both easterly deadend streets through the project site. The Low - Medium designation currently on the north half of the site was provided as a buffer between the Medium Residential to the west and the single family U GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -02 19th Street Corridor Land Use Amendments Page 10 subdivision to the east. Through the use of proper design controls and architecture and site planning, it is possible a project can be developed with a single family character compatible with the surrounding area. In terms of deciding if Low or Low - Medium is most appropriate for this site, the Commission must determine whether development of the property should be more sensitive to lard uses on the east (single family) or west (condominiums). Regarding the Office designation on the property, the COTT- mission denied a General Plan amendment to Low - Medium in March 1984. As you may recall, there was considerable discussion whether or not a sonewrat isolated site is appropriate for office development. If the Commission chooses to eliminate the office designation, all three subject parcels should be given the identical land use designations. VACML:' 77625 . MACf.11Yi AFI. lA i susxeT No 7Ri 7 7853 i 17:81- � . . ® t • J�F L_ J VACAM i o YJ+C I IIO K I 1 NBC ,` Ilf YC ^, -•ic :� PRO SUBJECT PERTY . W 1 fL -- - S• ICE •:.�.:•� i d �: G LO.i VJ i ut �i3 y �I 0 V V GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-02 19th Street Corridor Land Use P.endments Page 11 VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYS1 : Following a determin4ion by the Planning Commission regarding the specific land use revisions, staff will complete the Initial Study including the Environmental Checklist. This will allo.i for review of the potential environmental impacts based on more detailed information. Ix. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the alternatives on each of the sites and consider them in liaht of General Plan policies, compatibility with existing adjacent development, and future planned development. The Commission should then direct staff to complete the environmental analysis, to finalize the General Plan amendments, and to present a zone change where necessary for further consideration in conjunction with General Plan Amendments. I Res pec 4-gjLV submi ted, Rick 1 ty AG:C �I _(! LJ E e C 1 • •.' i .• i� ® ®� ®a a_•® �O o-..�. •.;. y1'•m ®'� ® ®isa�� eases I] a Inure LAND USE PLAM RESIDEWi IAL VERY LOW <2 Du's/Ac LOW 2 -4 DU's /AC r---i LOW - MEDIUM 4- 8CU•s/AC = >S'c::? �: MEDIUM 4-14 Dll's /AC MEDIUM-HIGH 14 -24 DU's /AC M HIGH 24 -30 DU's /AC O MASTER PLAN REQUIRED CRITY �O CUCAXIO\'GA PLANNING DIVISION .. COMMERCIAL /OFFICE ail COMMERCIAL E^ COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL © NEIGHBORHOOD COMM. EM REGIONAL COMMERCIAL E OFFICE c � NORTH IM%,1: &-PA, Sq -CO A - 19"ai sr. SrvtiY TITLE= 6 'kt- aZaN E1HIrsIT: SCALE:= E CITY OF RANCHO CUC_9M0NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 25, 1984 19;; TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENT"° ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT 84 -10 77K" _-The Eveiopment of a fully automated car wash on ar;� ozimately one (1) acre of land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 6) located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Jersey Boulevard - APN 209- 142 -32. RELATED FILE: CUP 81 -15 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval Gf site plans and elevations and issuance of a Negative Dec:aration. B. Purpose: Construction of a fully automated car wash. C. Location: Northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Jersey Boulevard-. D. Parcel Size: One (1) acre. E. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 6). F. Existing Land Use: Gas station. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin Nor h - Vacant; n ustria Par . South - Vacant; Industrial Park. East - Industrial; Industrial Park. West - Vacant; Industrial Park. H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial Park. North - Industrial Park. South - Industrial Park. East - Industrial Park. West - Industrial Park. ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 84 -10 - Beck Page 2 11 I. Site Characteristics: This site has been partially developed as a self - service gas station. The remainder of the site has been graded and temporarily turfed. Full street improvements and landscaping already exist on the property. J. Applicable Regulations: The Industrial Area Specific Plan permits automotive drive -thru car washes as a conditionally permitted use in Subarea 6. II. ANALYSIS• A. General: This project is a modification of the previously approved Conditional Use Permit 81 -15 that was grantee for the development of a service station and self - service car wash facility, as shown in Exhibit "B ". The car wash and cashier's booth have been designed with natural stone and wood siding consistent with the architectural theme etablished by the service station. The applicant is proposing to provide an automated car wash facility with the same architectural theme as the previously approved service station. The proposed car wash, Exhibit "C ", has a tunnel configuration. Therefore, the site plan has been adjusted to accommodate a drive -thru lane on the north and south ends of the building. Nine (9) parking spaces are provided between the existing self -serve gas station and the proposed car wash building for a detail area (e.g., vacuuming and waxing cars). 5. Design Review Committee: The Committee recommended approval subject to providing adequate berming and landscaping around the car wash building to screen the car wash activities, primarily at the entry and exit. All roof- mounted equipment (excluding skylights) must be properly screened per the Industrial Area Specific Plan requirements. The applicant has indicated that there will be no roof - mounted equipment with the exception of skylights or openings in the roof to provide for light and air. C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the initial Study as complete by t e app scant is attached for your review. Based upon completion of Part II of the Initial Study, staff has found that no significant adverse impacts will occur as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use and building design, together with the recommended Conditions, are in compliance with the Development Code and Industrial Area Specific Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. C'- a 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 84 -10 - Beck Page 3 IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing in The Dail Report newspaper and the property posted. A total of six 6 public hearing notices were mailed to property owners located within 300 feet of the project site. 71 date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider ail material and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for findings and Conditions of Approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Resp /ctfp 1jy-`sLbmi tted, ck Planner ® YG:DC:ns ts: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial Resolut E "A" - Location Map "B" - Previously Approved Site Plan "C" - Proposed Site Plan "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan "F" - Car Wash Elevations "G" - Kiosk Pay Booth) Elevations Sti:dy, Part I ion cf Approval with Conditions G -3 CIRCULA T ION 120' R.D.W. mom® 100' R.O.W. 88' or less R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE ITT * Existing Proposed TRAILS /ROUTES 0 0 0 o Pedestrian e • o v Bicycle .r-j Regional Multi -Use Special Streetscape/ Landscaping Power Line/ Utility Easement Creeks & Channels ru—, Bridge 4 Access Points tPark Fire Station CITY OF I-E„_ RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,- ; LE: r PLANNING DIVEnN ;cXHIBIT- SCALE: 6-,�/ A i'�' a �J I is o I µ Trash 1 =T258Y Ri`rD. I 1 A"FdVeV NORTH Cr ry CAF ITE_\ i °� RANCHO CUCrAMONNrG1. TITLE: TMOIW- S 5tM 15" PL-A1lfil\G DIVISION EXHIBITT= _SCALE- G -s I I I `7 -- ,a 1izria f �' ; •,�I -- - rJ ;` � }���� it =; I , - ; Cb CITY OF RA:\CHO CL.CA.xjo :GA PLANNING Dl'%UON 1=%SEV aivn , 11 J r_ ee NOlrf H (S-6 E E Z � z CITY OF RANCHO C;CANION A PUNNING DI'%'TSiON 9-V m NORTH . SiiHT �I �I 3� A•.Y .Y ww r. T 1 r: i•S'J.•... L� v yrr✓ --25�v BNm . CITY OF rrF -Nl: 0 A) p Sd-- i RANCHO CUCANIONGA -rrru- PL.4*Nr VL \G U,,Nr QN EXHIBIT=_Atw--- SCALE: I A J* O NORTH 1/ 1 i I AS% b-1 5VA '104 Ll n/oa9N £LE,AI)oJ Kiask NORTH CITY OF _ ITEtI: �� ?� �'�' I _ w RAINCHO CLCkNIO\GA TITLE: PL4i*NT,NIlG DIi'L9QN EXHIBIT: SCALE: El CITY OF RAITCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET- To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the Project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: APPLI(�.NT`S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 44ZZ4 '2296 Aee14 /AAe n 11crr__ NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: SAHT- AS At300 497 LOCATION. OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL. NO.) A09- 147—z-- 3G LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES.-AND-THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 -// r 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF ACREAGE OF PROJECT PROPOSED BUILDINGS V 1 Dr r- AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND IF ANY:_ DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFO.TRSATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): u 11 - - r --- -• •- - ��Trui TrY TIL�c M � tT�j �L�15� .QI�%b i �4 L -�lJ Atlt � Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? L3 I -2 �J i WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X3. Create a substantial charge in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) ? i� 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT-- If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete :he form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Developmer_t Review Committee. Title �-r3 C] \_J RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -10 FOR AN AUTOMATED CAR WASH LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AND JERSEY IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 6) DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 6th day of June, 1984, a complete application was filed by Larry Beck for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on t.ie 25th day of July, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the s ?te is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Toat the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment an t-at a Negative Declaration is issued on July 25, 1984. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -10 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide landscaping, including trees and shrubs, and berming to adequately screen the car was!i entry /exit. Details shall be included on landscape plans to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 2. All wash water from the car wash shall be collected into catch basins under the canopy and sewered to the satisfaction rf the Cucamonga County Water District, and Chino Basin Municipal Water District requirements. Resolution No. Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JULY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, fnairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy ecretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of July, 1984, Dy the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIO'iERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 6-1s �o c� JV u G _Q n E L 9- V V LL d S✓✓ Y 7 C+ LD 6 °O Jr O`_ N .•V D p ✓ Lf.✓_ N� Cy +� C °gtCq Jy Tr O Lq ✓RCN FF Ii q V 0 =L >L N ✓ d _ ° N � � V oL =u qav z,J,.�:ai= e H z 0 O 6 V 0 Q R O O O 0 C N H l "Y r O 6 y 6 C T�oq c^ a V +d O ° O N or' r V J 7 G YET � V O V C L r � O « O ^`V .uv cai b c= r N N f n ° q ' d i ✓ r Dr Y° u_ cd o ro�'aJr 0 � 1 C L n e° `o 0 C O Y 1 d V J F C O 9 n L O d U r d C L C L7 o V2r V p Cr i O ✓` J q V P 4 i a cL ^ u d✓ O q� L d 0 ✓ N i P ° p dL > qty Nc+ N L ew ✓ ° ` NC >oN gnnl�r^ Pr L qa Vi.O 9T .qV roc ' n °ocov 6 � Nd.JOU„Y > a _ i N° V c c o o q .t q C ✓o r G CVG r G C 4 q ' G q 2 O✓ V C O p L q ° v dV °V d«✓ r C � N y6tu `o 'E d V i `oo ui A P � V c 6 O p T T + `n qyc r L✓ O V O j 06 E V l Ci N- V c J E N _ L 'r °c aL >✓ d L V N J E y✓ J N C✓ q E « a O q cC PO N q 7 TErN �� nC_C 6.0.. «RCN ° «` °°° e¢G6� O`TV•E L Pdgro ��N uNd �,o —.Pu O r L n L o W 4 4 oc w N Iry \ \} 1 NI bI `o oagcN_vo O« C O L� _ «✓ E p c. y O H OO a � Or✓NgV....N� 6E�t Cqq •w 9 auV. Olr•°9 V_ q N q L •y t C ^� � q 0 T q G e y H w 6 O L C SO 1 O C c V CC a Y O O q 4 c r V V c v r J �� Y O q g L w✓+ u a L A � > O r E rN.�n 9 .,nJGq° Y,UNGN1O0 q NCT y ^N _`P c oy.=G o_p q �-,= �L Cr•' rN J vNq c --�.°. Y O¢L LO P � Ln` -L ^'may 7A 6V�roGV C^ rop'o dV�� pO L LC^_- Z �_?L U ^4y _ a n NLn `��NU re °= c'°u� - -Lo coq °_?y d n.x.ic •.°'i_ a '6 uN✓b ca.D bN' b= U 2 G•^ry .°.. T^ d L y- b •a r x yn uG i N --N ^_ ' 'a dcec ncc d•O mow`- r g roE L 4 U J= r C p D ro ro y r �— - o`--ME r brni VLp VC VVY . _ r qp CL - ^C NgN ��rro un°� L n -U O q r V q T UyD Nc_ 'YU�C -¢i `.N..>OC YO•aLLg '°°�„ u� .. ��N Lr J O y U r I N E V N° O N^ g O Y p N z d DE NLO� u n qr�N `o_ P— y'o-��q_i✓ i cr ,N„a o o °ne. c � c °ui O OCQv- ~ >.r...' 4C.wIC�rL aLb� ^roil LC °L cTn_ N�V JO Np LP N� n L ��'Op fiy _- Cc•OD .D 0= N G Uu_L_ qr VrjVpVY ` nCrr °O roroG6LD�� P�.°.rL V Vqc¢ .°-N� Q GVC ^ N�rTiLy �[O d^ Nr IZN4V LONJ V uGu 7Z C ^Prot .-.VCL ^ VOr G.1 6W Nd��C Wes^ pi i �° G t� c 6 JnV N° 6r 64L.m V _q i I mi I I I i 1 V N ¢ F Gp bum J VG ._. OS.O.L =..q L NrC VY.� CUr= L. q N-ViT 4 ¢¢N_ ./fjY OQ•00 d ro °�° •"•M '� C Dro�U VLOI gu x= 6VpJT 64d EC V~ •� E T L 4 L^ g O V n c Y a O .•l G V r Y ^ GD = •O �� �� ^~� p � L 6 u Q =� __ p j q LO y 4 q ro d n D r M e _ ro C.V.• > -L° q •`a `V CL C LL °C !^L QroJVN UPG TV •a p D^ qE dp >N y fp YL°' 4 u LLD_ N O P q C OLL LrO O N O Q _ N t � iCW GOpy C P C N V _ VC_ L `eO f1E C ^O p6 n ^YO iP �_� Hd Pea "c _p nGLi co ^•• ND.... ^o� E %7z;; r y C q .. "Z;.2 6 Cc c_ron .°_' .Ob.•�� pr J L'V T :2 N c d rLCOp� LC L.yL J_DFp 9 P9•`ap C^ p_D `Y YU CrL W q4 p.. dND_DV 6V pVL� ^•J G °y IMF vC p q ^NONq Q 4.+ p0C CN N _ ° p O F t o r. q` L L ro N_ L O• C °p• N C •C � V p C ¢ y = qy �' =a ^{` L �C OgPq Op Croce Pd C- �VyroJ• OUOP N r ro O F D M: L O e d p p p L^ O C O q O "o 4 o O O O V P C O u ' q O T q C G 6� y d V . f+ W .uT > LICD M °W D_9 VY UnOln� n4VyY qPy> .. ybE lvL J p 9`J.n6 q�u d r J¢ 4 N n p d M O O ^ n Hr'NO C�MD N4N J�p c e LL4Nd �4 t_ V nCl E`n'EO ro Erb n 1 _ G_r7 u tdi L P V' °cano. P c vu «-•c n� .°v ems° V �n ATV Nv GO u u q O u C P O -J f 7t u O N^ > ✓ q _d r I G c n d O. V L •' p D V � 9 L -'¢PP' V .T= ^.6VT NOLVO l OVO TDr l PO —� °Lod '� cum= a•� r dr.. ° i — °_ ^ e `ca dN� oc qo q CJ u ^ '� c -• D N C V C V S O L d.2 C ••� �yGPNU du O 9L NN ^_ _T `�� C u O W - Cq� gi�cc r�C�Q ✓�� C7 9 q Luu N6iNN ^y .na u rj C N rO6 L J P O P =� d NV Vw4 V r �v N C O qS_C C L p W CqV J u �n P C 7 C S E L L Pu d � t M q� ` r L^ r G r 9 u ✓^ - ? V C O c c L ° N O O✓ T _ _L 51 cD N^ "O N V L l g O n C J _q N -_. N d i D i V 9 C U w L C !"� n a n� • O W W H N° 9 l N O F C` P' •'n V q u O d p N 4 P c r.N < qF ✓` G �ci N q P L d C V a,d r cnr N° __ °`o Pr o do a o'o�� = c noq n_ o nN N d «^ q g •s c u -f u r N C N s L_ C Q -O o •DU d 4 d N 2 N OuC °�� L v d ni —CCa- _PD_ Nq O^C M N ' C L CC•D.- N -J NC �O� ]1 G C •. N o cLO^ ECOO N_ Pdyu °L q� C .r d qdQ M O_N G>CC C DVa .nelcG Nq�u _N ur u P V Z P- w d 6 •tCO n N ® LL d ^VE d'r✓l ri O D C L= O. i yVPi rr V� 4�� CaL F" ��� q •-. F C N C q d N` r✓ � D P d V dnC d D -NC]O ON O EV St zva> N O L'• y CN C C C L >` � P w � V d P C EE q V W�� N 'u J i -• d Zf 9_ n n C O C q n J O l l C •^ p •r.• p Or dNC °Ol °�L• � CS AEC 2 �9 MN�d �O �_O PgCL NyM 6L G L _ 2. L c 9 d = O C C q u Q C O ".2 O:Y =N ^F ydLN d C q C PL C NO d J� Zd • d v OO idS]r0 C6r qd �^ qy �° Qw 0= g L OLL 1 =�1 CO N du OrN r� V OO•rp d q O. q q ✓ V t � d� = Y C. d p ` d C Q° F d C G O C O C° �� D P O C v V 9 i n N Pu t Oar N V r t D r q P l y O> L F d b l- -U q• V y N q - q -J u N M C q^ ^ Y L l- 9 •Jj M N 6ld S d P � w^ •..rOUV ^Lt�•�u d� L P, P OqJ y C CC N� r`V V � �u O u °yP ° d q YCC ` Y✓Y -- _ CPrddC rr.0 n`n nN j3 Oud 9DrY dN EN NL ^R^ .0'4 r L�..m v ^.o •°°adi. «u � ✓c ^� _ d .✓i.M�- i-`.d qd ,^c y o a e M H G w t o Q L r o n c 6 r 6 i°o 41 4« o 6 N 2 M 0 Z.2 N 10I of • O v 0 L G .. C —d CC UC 72 :2_ Oy V Cd LC P OI �✓ N _-1 �N -- r 4 —✓ � '� O _U.ry r�c oI E o_ c N N i `✓= V c P_ — N O > .O � 7 V n LL Ow. P _� �'U t4 9 _^ q'L OV 9'FJ V Y. -.Ndc _ O✓ Tp r✓ _ � m '25 zz ✓uU q`V q � nU y SI `PLV � ✓ u 4 � F .+ __P t GU ^l .7 A O N � ✓ N� 90 2. nc��r o oc _ 9p 9• 61 -� E,Ge N6 _ Ncn _ v p CV Pu` � UU V C �n 1C qmp d 4 d� p5 V Od O FL' O up lJ P L ✓i V✓ V - N6 O 6y -✓ ^9 ^✓n p yN Ld ` `C OT?- dp _ O °>J GrJ per- 9 Von p« O VCg9 1]c✓y pYp p r_ q✓ 4 �p °- =cr,- N�+ - -o o✓c qn ci s_ «°d n o f e. u N c�✓ v N N r � r c m d n u ,� - z� °✓ .= o � u Ii T•+d= >q LC Vf O �J GO— �UW L L e 1e O d -J6 ^J9 Y I �`� —_ E — � L N � O� 6JC =4N a O. y ✓ 1 -9t0 N L y C O 9^ —✓ m �I ✓ 6VJ j WO �� W VV 7n Lcir OOnY it Q� Ni I N =O rte- 9� . ✓C d N ]� q ` d 4 6✓C O [ii_ Q9 e cc c -' EL Lc „ � -dd �N 3 O o I O t - c ✓ c i ✓_ � �u4 '° Id asp ni ..�° a r - IS t N u O p J ¢ V � O °✓ O ` V N O V 4 c 4 j � Y J_` q r pr L � ✓ � c t y 6 C � � r 9 F� C C U✓ O ` J p V.] v 9 ✓`` V— c i ] I _ N L N N✓ d c 9 L r N_O O F — ✓ q = > u V g i Q✓ 7= ryN 00_T” C� rGl 19.. C_ 4. =6 y` ✓ __ Npv ai S.'d ..6 cVW 00 cly � 4."_ ci E E o dd �COr Ny.a.. ✓ �. O 9 a.�o i 490 NE V Nav N' 9�- ° ✓ �. � rN 9V -_ E -O..c= _o ✓ PL cG� m7 NI CTC lyOr 90 p =P � G Q UO C✓ p9> L c =1 V O C✓ p V 6 = � _a t L ` O TOR CI E 2 6 mr y Q Gu L m� 314N6 .`.q 61 1 N u G+ n✓ c L L ' � � O — V N c L c N a 7-2 N I 1 V I i n `V L I ti tj C - ^G ^ ^O l o t 14 O V V O V O L O 67Z ci ° Iz 9 ]n er" L O O O D C � .�.r n y0 9 V ✓ p L P ^d l m PO rTC CM d6 —'J yG E r ycN•+ •d..i rE O O a 9 N V C® V L d— °_ � O C V q — O� O= O �� u� Z d O ` •—r = — T e� a0 n^ r p yCi�' �•..•CP CVOVd VL_ =� EN dN d O dnUO �G� •.. �C O£ 0 C O .". C O r v �� _ ^C.r O ` L r N n. O L y0• E r — p °>'r d ✓ y >E v dt •°. oc.�y y C = _ p. r •e C .n> O r V C G C° 1 0, y li Nr GCl yrd.•PU C^ 7;; d`V— O C iCV= L>� :5 r i s O V I N �. ^!. n � � r V ^ O � �� r N✓ 7 r'(` C a O n d w e• Et t O 6 Y V O P �I O 9 O O °— E l � m a V P `. y V N O O N •� '6 SO m P O V C O = v C I —j r r .a rr r .• o- - ° L G a G PV V T L J V u ' G G G C G W y C. y V Z =� � ' V L _ T L C✓ O q V Uy t c I �y V u 2 N a O I V Z.,3 �` � 9 J L = gr. ` G coo cV 'C LvLC.i tT r I UyC rd L wn °."..i r °JLV p V7 W qJT V Or C I GU n N G U I V P l .Li• ` U -J6 F p O LO V O U �� �.-" � i0 � nC `0 Ln.. q - 7 GN GC C .0 I j 'Y9� C r OC r � \ q � � c eL.r OTt F'V LJ.. O ru 9�• iC w E ca= � e i G o. i TY �- O Q✓ _ C V q ^! y W N .Va � r Y P _ n9 c'o ire. c 31 °c N ) ° o°i = n. 7Z c V 6. W r n L ` L W 3 6 tJi ^v 6nn Cw �f cJ C O C C U O E 2 C V r � i c o= V_ n i E r PV V T L J V u ' G G G C G W y C. y V Z =� � ' V L _ T L C✓ O q V Uy t c I �y V u 2 N E r PV V T L y O =� � ' V L _ T L C✓ O q V I a O I V Z.,3 �` � 9 L = gr. ` =-9 Lo Ln.. q - 7 GN GC C .0 I j 'Y9� C r OC r � \ q � � c eL.r OTt F'V LJ.. O ru 9�• iC w Lcc ca= � e i G o. i TY �- O E r C l C V C✓ O y P✓ �� C C C✓ ✓ � � q a c CvVI p O 9 V O � Q y I q d I I L V n TC q O G C ✓ 'a n- ✓ D _ Q r_ N � e ✓� J ✓ Y Q p � N � N NE d Gy 1 O V � ONy u u N ✓ u�• � 1 ✓ ✓N MO T • d I OPT q O.L 09 d � — =✓ ✓ — p d u E ^ v L q M Cc �� c =• c CL c LJ � N q D O � I O q q � d� ` •' L 9 y O D V •°i• � •J .m .O• I nJVD O n —O O N C C V C✓ O y P✓ �� C C C✓ ✓ � � q p O � Q y q L V n TC Y O i C ✓ 'a n- .� Q r_ N � e ✓� J ✓ Y Q p � N � `c NE y V � u •Oi• MO T Y OPT m 09 d � — =✓ ✓ u E ^ v � M �� c =• c v c rS c � n q D O � I O q � d� 9 y O D V •°i• � •J .O• O —O N — q °Y `N c40O — I �y —.N.• ✓u O P J n y N L L _ � ✓ � . O V .—.• • � C q V ✓ i ie m L qN � ✓� c - ' rnq ° i n-°. - �� N � o ✓ M d � a .r. V ^> D b 7 O L q m a m U 1 Io •L •°a' 9 i G 1 n v I L q d C — C mL.• � O � °'✓ v o � Vic+ �� -�q czm O �q =e N D••q q� u E > C � W n W 9 f �_ ✓ � q O � 9 • �� L N Y L` T •rn Y .^ — V 1 — r ./ — m Y 6 V q N✓ C -`J •vle a N • v Tu 4 > m -d L n -c dY D b Y✓^ o.•- ✓'> N L -u -- r_ q— - > 4 n.Y..a o o Y i- Ft. s Lam✓ c Z u c ?� �� � gN 7 <✓ n � -vim < - of e� pt r.I Nt ^I al �� eI �� N7 ,. � • �I Li� .•. � G az d U 11 Et CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 25, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kral], Engineering Technician SUBJECT: E:VIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8550 - WAGNER - A division 0 1 , acres of and into parcels in tthee General Industrial District (Subarea 13) located on the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and 7th Street - APN 229 - 261 -65 & 66) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of parcel map. B. PurDOse: To divide 14.38 acres of land into 7 parcels. C. Location: Southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and 7th Street. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 1.01 net Parcel 4 1.63 n t Parcel 2 1.00 net Parcel 5 1.11 net Parcel 3 1.00 net Parcel 6 4.93 net Parcel 7 3.70 net Total T4--Z net acres E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial (Subarea 13). F. Existing Land Use: Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use: Nort - acant South - Existing nursery and vacant land East - Wood frame house and vacant West - Vacant. H. Surround in General Plan and Development Code Designations: Nortn - General Industrial Subarea 13 South - Genera] Industrial - (Subarea 13) East - General Industrial (Subarea 14) West - Industrial Park (Subarea .11.) ITEM H Planning Commission Staff Report ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 3550 - WAGNER July 25, 1984 Pape 2 1. Site Characteristics: The property is fairly level sloping at approximately 1%. There is an existing wood frame house on the northeast corner. The rest of the property is covered by an abandoned vineyard. 11. ANALYSIS: The map proposes to divide 14.38 acres of land into 7 parcels occated with Subarea 13 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The Specific Plan suggests a street connection through these areas to facilitiato orderly subdivision of the properties within Subarea 13. An Offer of Dedication for the street has been provided on the map as shown. Future subdivision design of the remaining parcels within the subarea may dictate a different circulation pattern for the area in which case the proposed street on this map may be vacated. The Offer of Dedication as shown on parcels 5 and 7 is for the future realignment of old Rochester Avenue in conjunction with the future 1 -15 ramps at 7th Street. A copy of this plan is attached for your review. All off -site improvements will be required to be constructed at the time of development of each parcel. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the InitTal Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Plannine Commission consider all input an elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. uliy submi LBH: Attachments: Map - Tentative Resolution City Engineer's Initial Study & Vicinity Report z U. g El E --��. .o __���� v mss.( ^��r�1L— � -.W __•___- —_ ' I J IIwa 51 PROJECT; Li SITE id I w I _ Ls ..np � I • -M Jp • x>nr i � ihl. � IY' � � A(4NaagfQ. I 4 ff � r I vJ I I�I3 I a 0 I •e xw.c ;/ n «. La. >sc ro n.. w .> zv.-..c c> <�•>ea c t >.. w >/N !. nTS � >r• >+� /a'> Is cn •(a.. r:. w � / >l CITY OF RANCHO CUCA�IONCA title; ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP N Page 0 Y O = u N 7 O l / C o So ,E ^ Y J 2 cpo CC) U ;ire M � p37• 9 :� f � \ z=a�a phpi: {{..��Y {{9� z < a 01 Boa >�4ao•. o n Qz�.: i6Y � j —L— e'o$ Ww au$z x f-'Ja e 1 jo_ p u RQ- I..i� WI �` 91, wViVM_Jq� ayVtl'i •I�b AI.M/' Y L6GG u r a � n = S 'l C v O ? q O g � 0 v o= 7 � "o f �i m. 1 i I i I 1 1 l So p O Y %� � p37• 9 :� f � \ phpi: {{..��Y {{9� 4 • 1 i E e •r aje —L— L6GG u r a � n = S 'l C v O ? q O g � 0 v o= 7 � "o f �i m. 1 i I i I 1 1 T � • � ,� , /'' 1. � • -�- \ ' Y �_ � {,: • !' •> ` • a � fin' • �'it� 'i� cry 7th STREET �I• i ti!. I t li C tl i I W Li � 1 { t C ' ; � •' •�' 3 t• N I ii ;. �� n I: •• O i � I. � rn ,I - <i i Ji I{ II I H -5 f G T y L: IAJ LAJ FIG. iv-13 SR DJID LLI I- lU CIRCULATION 120' R.O.VI/_ ® 100' R.O.W. �® 88' or less R.O:,N_ RAIL SERVICE - - +-+-i —}- Existing +-}--t ... Proposed TRAILS /ROUTES 0000 Pedestrian 0000 Bicycle Regional Multi -Use Special Streetscaoe/ ,A- . Landscapins Power Line! Utility Easement Access Points 0 400' 800, 1600' Note: Parcel tines and lot configurations are shown as approximation only. C3 HA, Exhibit P.M. 8550 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be cc ^pleted and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application 4s made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff wil= prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration Will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- ® tion concurnirg the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: 7tri`d'LiVe rarcel iti,7D o55- 0 APPLICANT'S Richard 1•Jagn 714/,46 -7390 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: r. 6.0. Box 7457, Newport Beach-7-77- 5i NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON Mays, TE CONTACTED Inc_, CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: pc r1 / -j4yc 517 N. Euclid venue, Ontario, LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Southwest corner of 6th Street and Old Roc ester Avenue, A.. P- 110s. L27401 -07 anu 00 - LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE 7.GENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: N/A I -1 +H- , PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 0 parcel 1r7L's Lrld1 p3fK ACREAGE OF PROJECT t,REA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Area = 16.6 acres Building ❑o ar POS�0 aL D,_S uuc_ DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENT_L SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The property is fairly level with no outstanding features. There is an existino wood frame house on the northeast_ corner of the property _ with several trees surrounGinq it. I,e rest oT the property is covered -Dv an abanconea vinevara now overaro:wn :•ntn weeds_ io Lhe nOttn Lnere are no pxistino structures_ To the SOULh There is a snail nUrsery and LhP rernainaer is unimOroyea. To the east there is a wood frame house_ To the west there is an imustrial building aooroxinateiv 1/4 male away. The maiority of the area was used for agriculture (vinevara). Animal I ife is limitea to common birds and ro^enLs. here are no existing structures on the site. Is the project pa=t of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? rqo 1-2 H I E 11 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial charge in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 0 X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that tie statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits p_esent the data and informatics required for this initial eval,,atiCn to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented aie true and correct t, the best of my knowledge and Lelief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted Lenore an adequate evaluation can be trade by the Development Review Committee. Date ,S 12-1 f Signature Title ,(, 17. /rr •R 1-3 H RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8550 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8550), LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER, AVENUE ANP 7TH STREET WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8550, sub,nittet by R. H. 'Wagner and consisting of 7 parcels, located at the southwe:,t corner of Rochester Avenue and 7th Street, being a division of a portion of Lots 37 and 38 of Rochester as per map recorded in Book 9, Page 20 of Maps, records of San Bernardino County, State of California; and WHEREAS, on May 9, 1984, a formal application was submitted requesting review of t'ie above - described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on July 25, 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCPMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the follcwing findings have been made: to 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement 3f the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on July 25, 1984. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8550 is approved subject to the recovrnended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. H_ 1c) APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JULY, 1984- PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C'UCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: :tick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passEd, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of July, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COifi1ISSIGNERS: HUES: CO%vISSIDNERS: ABSENT: COr-1tyISSIONERS: N -11 El E 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REM%11MENDEH CO ?iDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: Sourhewest corner of Rochester TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO: Avenue a:d 7th, Street DATE FILED:__ ^ay 9, 1984 LEW,t rESCRI ?TION: A subdivision of a NUMBER OF LOTS: 7 portion of Lot 37 and 38 of Rochester as per SRCSS ACREAGE: 14.33 8550 map recorded in San Bernardino County, ASSESSOR PARCEL ND:229- 26' -65 &56 State of Cali lornia. DEVELOPER M1 1- R ENGINEER /S�JRVEYOR Richard Waaner, et al same L. D. King, Inc. 1215 Outriqqer Drive Coron,. De: ?tar, CA 92525 517 N. Euclid Avenue Ontario, CA 91762 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho C:,camonga include, but may not be limited to,, the following: Dedications and Vehicular k cess 1. Dedications shall be mare of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easemen s as shown on the tentative map. X_ 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: Offer to Dedicate 54 ft, for the extension of Rochester Avenue Offer to Dedicate various additional feet en Old Rochester Ave. as shown on the tentative map. 30 additional feet or, 6th St. 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C. &R.s and shall be recc-ded concurrent with the map. -1- .g -/ oZ X 5. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed satisfaction of the City Engineer and tedAttorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to to building permit issuance for individual parcels. 2. A lier agreement must be executed prior to recording of the mar for the following: 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewat=_rirg all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divisor, prior to recording fcr and /or prior to issuance of building permit for Street Pursuant to Improvements the City of Ranch Cucamonga Munic`pai Code, Title 15, Section 15.35.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approac:ies, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 25 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half section streets. X_ 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to building permit issuance for individual parcels. Curb & Street Name Gutter A.C. Pvmt. Side - walk Orive ;_reef Street A.C. Appr. Median Trees Lights Overlay Island* Other 5th St. X X X X X X landscaping Rochester X X X X X X Old X X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter -7- H -1� X C X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permi' shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared' by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 5. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be underorounded. X B. install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street Haht locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and t`• City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and - approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of puilding permit. 11. Concelrtrated drainage flows shat ", not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control V 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of s•arface drainage enterinc, the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Ci.y Engineer L, Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff -3- a Sradinq X 1. Gradina of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. the final grading plan shall be subject to review and rpproval _ by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to th? Buiiding and Safety Division for approval prior to issuanct of building permit. General Requiremmts and Approvals x 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: is CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water X San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions !C.C.&R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. x 3. provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. x 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be su�'ject to conditions if approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 5. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. ME )5 X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County 'slater District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification ;s received in writing. S. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for _and /or prior to building permit issuance for _ X 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. A request for the vacation of 3 feet of right -of -way on old Rochester Avenue as shown on the tentative mat shall be 40 submitted to the City prior to recordation of the map. X 12. Reciprocal access between parcels 1 and 2 and parcel 5 and property to the south shall be provided and delineated on the map. X 13. Undergrounding of existing overhead utilities shall be covered by a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement at the time of development and waived if such work is found unnecessary by the City Council. N-(� -b- CI. OF RANCHO CUCA:+lONGA LLOYD S. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: — CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA ��y�,,uo ST a VP 3?1V1Dn1am '00-0-1 ' .✓atat i 1rJl.Ji V1L1 + Yi JDATE: July 25, 1984 TO: Planning Commission 1977 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ".1D PARCEL MAP 8649 - SIMPSON STRONG -TIE COMPANY, INS. - A division of _0. 69 acres of and in the M —ini Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9) located on the southside of Jersey Boulevard, east of ':intent Avenue - APN 209- 143-28 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of parcel map. ® B. Purpose: To divide 10.169 acres of land into 2 parcels. C. Location: On the south side of Jersey Blvd., east of Vincent A•e. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 4.128 acres Parcel 2 6.041 aces Total 1777 ac -es E. Existing Zonin Minimum„ Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9). F. Existing Land Use: Parcel I - existing industrial building Parcel 2 - existing industrial building. G. Surrounding Land Use: or Nth - Yacart South - Vacant East - Vacant West - Existing industrial building. H. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: Korth - Minimum Impact 'eavy Industria District Subarea 9) South - General Industrial /Rail Served East Minimum Impact West - S;nimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9). ITEM I Planning Commission Staff Report ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8649 - SIijPSON STRONG -TIE CC'., INC. July 25, 1984 Paae 2 I. useg Characteristics: Both parcels are developed and com,ain bui dings used for manufacr,�rj�g� warehousing and office uses. The property served by a railroad spur line. II. ANALYSIS: The owner, --impson Strong -Tie Company, Inc., is requesting a c.�vision of 10.169 acres of land into two separate parcels for the two ex ;sting buildings. No further development of either parcel is planed at this time. Off -site improvements, except for street lights, are existing. The installation of the street lig is is required prior to recordation of the parcel map. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I o the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon -ompletion and review of the initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the .environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounGing property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended :nat the Planning Commission consider ail input ­and of the p oject. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. Resp tfuily submitted, LBH:BK :jaa Attachments: Map - Tentative Resolution City Engineer's Initial Study & Vicinity Report al 11 U- 11 El T E NTi:J, E S.ttT - pt 1 "ECT ,RCE1 M P I VO (8)6941J f H� 'L N. ?HG C:T° 0; RANC40 COC: MONGL f SGat[•i •sp' I rar, IY O• •_•wn �•'• •'ao♦ b ac. T •u[[L •n• �H!, as ♦[[o.Otp �G w [op• n, Dr rra[L u. •3 ..ce •] •[cc•OS D• •♦1[ ' f ML�rCfr roa... pr S.. NE..rumwp. l'R[ Dr c.u•MwJ D�rta 5f•IrSDw fsTMpwc •TQ LCpwG[ n. r.r uG• .�„ N'JV iTWL .•t,r�:v.•.- C ^r ea +r 1. C. .0 Y I. 1 .• .j L ! • I I •..tat: � _.... .. _..m L. yG wt- t 'L 1 I L. yG wt- t 'L 6 I f I I �G 2� it {(QR 1 .�„ N'JV iTWL J t'• 1 I i -w 'L t I I I �G i it {(QR M1 .�„ N'JV iTWL .•t,r�:v.•.- • .0 Y I. J t'• 1 I i -w 1 F 'L t I W �G i {] {(QR la...♦.c.l M.a ♦e .t •t.o r ♦ .�„ N'JV iTWL .•t,r�:v.•.- • .0 Y I. 1 .• .j L ! • I 1 F Tray; al SECT�CV •.: °•;.•. _• ♦•♦ 'L t I W �G i {] {(QR la...♦.c.l M.a ♦e .t •t.o r ♦ .�„ N'JV iTWL .•t,r�:v.•.- • .0 Y I. Tray; al SECT�CV •.: °•;.•. _• ♦•♦ t I W {] {(QR la...♦.c.l M.a ♦e .t •t.o r ♦ .�„ N'JV iTWL .•t,r�:v.•.- I. .�\ I W {] {(QR la...♦.c.l M.a ♦e .t •t.o r ♦ .�„ N'JV iTWL .•t,r�:v.•.- I. Im CITY OF RANCHO CUCkNIONCA ENGINEERING DIV �� ISaON N VICIL \I VICINITY I Y 1�I:,P title; P-,Fe CITY CE I7ZT_ TIAL STUDY I To be conPleted by appl_ cant Environ -ental Assess; =en - Review Fee: SS 1. QS For all projects requiring envlronm2::ta1 review, t:.15 for:1 :-,us-, be completed and sub -itted tc) the Development Review (,';,;^Puttee th:: -uc-h the depart-° --,It where the Project appllcat101-1 is made. Upon receipt Of this �' - t ^e En`- 'i.ron?t°_nz31 Analysis staff will prepare app�lcaaon, Part Ii of the Initial Stndv. The Development Review Co-mittee will meet and take acpica no later than ten (10) days before the public ne =t_ng at which time the pro jc,.ct is to be heard. The co-raitree will make one c- three deterainations: 1) The project will have no sacni- ficant erviron: =ental impact and a Negative Declaration will be -Filed, 2) The project will have a sisni -Fican- environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An adciticnal in- or- ration report shoui3 be supplied by the applica- nt giving further ir. -Fcr' a- ticn concerning the Proposed project. 0 PROJECT TITLE: Parcel _tap No_ 8649 A=PLICZYNVS NA""W, ADDRESS TE —LIP_ ^:ONE: Sirmson Strong -Tie Co=anv, Inc_; 31155 Je- ev Boulevard rancho Cucamonga NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO B: CONTACTED CONCE-RNING THIS PROJECT: Bob Rettig Jer LOG�TIO C? PROJECT (ST E T ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL N0.1 11155 Jersev Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga LIST OTHER PER?IITS NECESSARY FRO -M LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND r EDEFLXL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERK:TS : %one I -1 S- S 1 � DESCRIPTICN OF PROJECT: Vii,. one 10- "it to t -:•o lots with one cilia Q ,c ACRZA—�Z OF PROJECT AREA e !ID SQL *IR.E FCO:nG OF E:•:Ic�IG :s`:D PROPOSED TSUI:.DI`iGS, IF ANY.. 20.277 acres total with 25,200 s.f. and one building wit -,b,_J' sS.-.. on` JL'll l ^C n DESCRIBE THE Z- VIRC:::•IEVT L SETTIN G OF T-E PRO__ C SIT_ I`ICLUDI::G I_iF0&IiTIO:J O:d TOPOGRAPH's, PLANTS AN!='IAT-S, 2AM CULTURAL, HIETCRICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE CF SUR ROI::1DING PROPERTIES, SID THE CF-SC'-"-- 1. OF z - -;y EXISTING STRUCTUREES Z-ND THEIR USE (ATTACi NF CZSSiR'I SF; ETS) Is the project part of a larger project, ene Of a series Of curulative ac_icns, which although individual -, -r s ^all, may as a whole have significant environr..ental i-cact? no I_2 6 l' v.--L7- x 1_ Create a s _star.__al chance ' ground contours? x 7 - �= Create a su sta -tial c3`% =2 =:1 2 \1sr j ornoise - -• - -• x 3- Create a si�bstantial cha::ce in demand for ser.ices (police, -re, .:ac =_r, r_n - sewage, etc.)? x 4. Create chances in the ex_st-::c zo::_ a or general plan desicna 4sns? -; r tres? cw x 5- Rey -�c; e any e- - -s inc _ x Create the need for use or disposal of E L a_s such as potentiailY ..azardo s mater t0 -, substances, riar ,natjes or explosives? £xplar_at; on of any YyFSS a .s ers above: I^L °ORlA\T: If the pra;ect i_�vo1v >_s the co,s= ructic^ of residential units, co ^plete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION -- I hereby certify `: t the statements rn: he aahcVe and 1:: _: c attach, -a present present tS'22 du__._s_._- f th -s initial evaluat.on data and information required or t the facts, statements, and to the best of my abil:t_. , ar_c information presented are trre and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief­ I further understand that additional info=.ation may be rec,:ired to be s- b -fitted before an adequate keval.catioa can be made by the De-: elopmen Reevie/w/ /Com�ni-- t�t%ee. f Date t Title Registered Civil Enaireer JI- -f 3 El RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF 'THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TiiE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8649 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ;10_ 8549), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF JERSEY BOULEVARD, EAFT OF VINCENT AVENUE Strop WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8649, submitted by Simpson g -Tie Company, Inc., and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard, east_ of Vincent Street, being a division of Lot 3 of Parcel Map no Counts recorded in Book 15 of Parcel Maps, Page 85, records f San Y, State of Californ;a; and o WHEREAS, on June 12, 1984, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on July 25, 198 ;, the Planning CO-W fission held a duly advertised public hearing for 'the above- described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: I- That the map is consistent with the Generai Plan. 2- That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Gen-ral Plarj. 3- That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4- That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will, not create significant adverse environmenta Impacts and a Negative Declaration :s ;ssued on July 25, 1984. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8649 is approved subject to the recommended ditions of Approval pertaining thereto. �— d APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JULY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: 6ennis L, Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Commission of the Planning Coagnission held on the 25th day of July, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: :1:—q E E El CITY OF RANCVO CUCAMONGA RECO%.MENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: South side of Jersey Blvd., east TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP V. : 8649 of Vincent Ave. DATE FILED: June 12, 1984 LEGAL, DESCRIPTION: Being a subdivision of NUMBER OF LOTS: Lot 3 of Parcel Mao 1797, as recorded in GROSS ACREAGE: 10.169 Book 15 of Larce'. Maps, Page 85, records of ASSESSOR PARCEL NO:209- 143 -28 San Bernardino County, State or Ca3�rornza DEVELOPER O'.6!ER ENGINEER /SURVEYOR Simpson Strong -Tie Co..Inc. same George Mim Mack 11155 Jersev Blvd. 214 S. Euclid Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Ontario CA 91761 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: Four (4) additional feet on Jersey Blvd. additional feet on additional feet on 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C. &R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. 10 -1- X 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer "s requirements. 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recording for and/or to building permit issuance for prior X 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: und2rgroundina of existing lines of 12 KV or less fronting the property. 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit for Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all haif- section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements prior recordation: urb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street A.C. Median ,tter Pvmt. Walk Appr. Trees Lights Overlay Island* X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter -2- al to LJ Drainage and Flood Control X 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The fol'owing storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Citv Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff -3- X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, ® fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. 8. install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. LJ Drainage and Flood Control X 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The fol'owing storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Citv Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff -3- Gradinq 1. Grading Uniform grading substan plan. of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Building Cod=_, City Grading Standards and accepted practices. The final grading plan shall be in tial conformance with the approved conceptual grading 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows= CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control District Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino Ccunty Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation, of the map. 3. Provide ali utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance -is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. -4- M-13 E 11 E X 7. The filing of the tentative :nap or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water Dist ict will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits wit-l" not be issued unless said -ertification is r:•r2ived in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance for - X 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. Prior to recordation of the map, a plan showing type, occupancy and specific locations of the buildings in relation to the proposed parcel lines shall be submitted to the Building Official for determination that the maximum allowable areas and /or fire resistive requirements for the buildings meet the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. X 12. Prior to recordation of the map, the applicant shall provide or verify separate utility service connections to each building. X 13. Prior to further development of Parcel 2, accepting of additional drainage flows by adjacent property shall bc. obtained. -5- K CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: 11 CITY OF PUNCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 25, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FnCIM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVI 197 REVIEW 84 -13 - Dtuu —ji iAil - ire aeve iopmenL OT iwo k[) warenouse distribution buildings totaling 78,940 square feet on 4.9 acres of land in the General Industrial category (Subarea 4) located approximately 250 feet east of Archibald, south side of 6th Street - APN 210 - 071 -50. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of a precise site plan and building elevations for the Industrial project described above. B. Purpose: To create two (2) warehouse /distribution buildings. C. Location: South side of 6th Street, east of Archibald. D. Parcel Size: 4.9 acres. E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial, (Subarea 4). F. Existing Land Use: Vacant parcel. G. Surroundinq Land Use and Zonin North - General Industrial, Zoned General Industrial. South - General Industrial, Zoned General Industrial. East - Vacant parcel, Zoned General Industrial/Rail Served. West - General Industrial, Zoned General Industrial. H. General Plan Desi Project Site - Ge North - General South - General East - General West - General nations: neral— Industrial (Subarea 4). Industrial (Subarea 4). Industrial (Subarea 4). Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5). Industrial (Subarea 4). ITEM J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84 -13 - Barmakian My 25, 1964 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The site consists of a vacant parcel which slopes in a north /south direction with nine feet of fall occurring across the site. The site contains a variety of indigenous plant materials. Improvements are non - existent. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: As illustrated in Exhibit "A ", the applicant is proposing the expansion of the Archicenter complex located on the corner of Archibald and 6th Street. The complex will consist of two concrete tilt -up structures which will function as warehouse /distribution clearinghouses for manu`actured products. Access to the project will be provided via 6th Street. Ninety -two parking stalls have been provided, designed to accommodate all parking needs,. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee was primarily concerned WM the expanded height of the buildings and recommended that dark colors be employed along building 900 elevations in an effort to reduce the overall visual height of the structure. In addition, the Committee recommended that all colors and building textures match the existing Archicenter structures located to the west. C. Development Review Committee: The Development Review Committee was prima,I ly concerned with the westerly drive approach and recommended that this driveway be combined with the existing Archicenter driveway lying to the west. D. Grad in Comsmittee: The Grading Committee approved the conceptua gra 1ng plan, subject to approval of a final grading plan. The Committee was primarily concerned with 'ne removal and reconstruction of existing drainage structure; located on the adjacent westerly parcel (Archicenter). E. Environmental Assessmen.: Part I of the Initial Study has been compiet by the app icant and is attached for your review. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the construction of the project. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. QL 11 LJ 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84 -13 - Barmakian July 25, 1984 Page 3 III. FACTS FOR FIN DINGS: The findings listed in the attached Resolution were supported y t e following facts: o The project provides adequate setbacks, landscaping, and improvements which make it compatible with surrounding land uses. o The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the develo ,ent and the proposed uses are in accordance with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance. o The proposed building design and site plan, in conjunction with the Conditions of Approval, are consistent with the current development standards of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE- This item has been advertised for environmental review in The Dai7�Report newspaper. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission ® approve t e project described above, subject to the Conditions of Approval contained on the attached Resolution. Respectfully -submitted, l% Ll T Planner :FD :ns Attachments: Exhibit Exhii:it Exhibit Exhibit Initial Re 1 "A" - Site Plan "B" - Illustrative Site Plan "C" - Elevations "D" - Grading Plan Study, Part I SO utjon of Approval with Conditions �- 3 0 fit+ tll? c=w"fgb c , ej Ala u FEE=, I __ z•s —ln bu131y9w I. �. t� N h ate - I_I Ili• IMiV� 1 J.��d «� � 8 �.0+�.�P790 _ ■ a `�� of a �iasi.r... +e,.•c,.�=� INDEX Vl' SHEEM eac.•n -ov✓ I � of - a�1a dt f CITY OF, BLAI CHO CUCAiN,10, 'GA PLANNING DIVISION t ITEM TITLE S �'�-E- 1 ? Vl F-Vil iIT. SCkLE: V v NORTH N:.li M �• '�G -�.J � � NORTH UL x x OF ITEM: R.A\CI i0 CLGkiN'10 \'C7A TITLE--- O �-y� IOnS P1.ANNI \G DI \'ISTON EXHIBIT n_� E 1 / SiXT" SCE —T soc �s.asc'f0590 u ^(' � 1���F~ .,((/jai• ,�a' �`� -�,t -I x I ''(�Ij 1••'.' r r FTL FL. a CITY OF ITBI: RANCHO 1O CUCANNIONGA TITLE: PLANNII`'G DIWSION EX11113IT: _o SCXLE: L/ `J NORTH .n ,a CITY OF ITBI: RANCHO 1O CUCANNIONGA TITLE: PLANNII`'G DIWSION EX11113IT: _o SCXLE: L/ `J NORTH [FORTH dory OF ITE RANCHO CUC- M0- GA TITLE: � ii�LiaP PUIC INI \G DR'ISION LXI i113IT: -T_ —.— scALE: � -x 0 Il LI Ll RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RAMCYO CUCATMONGA PLANNING CBARMAKIEN APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW id0. 84 -13 - EAST OF LOCATED 013 THE ARCHIBALD IN THE GENER L (SUBAREA 4j DISTRICTT, WHEREAS, on the 15th day of 'gay, 1984, a complete application was filed by the Barmakian Company for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of July, 1984, the Rancho Cuccamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Co,;mission resolved as rollcws. SECTION i. 2. 3. That the following can be met: That the proposed project is objectives of the General Plan; in accord with the Code and the purposes site is located; and consistent with the and That the proposed use is objective of the Development of the district in which the the proposed use is in compliance with each of applicable provisions of the Development Code; That the and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will o welfare, pot be detrimental rimen mat to a ly public health, safety, injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment a at a Negative Declaration is issued on July 25, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -13 is approved subject to the followin tions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Dark colors shall be used on all building elevations in an effort to reduce the visual height of the structures. Revised colored elevations shall be provided and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. All buildin colors and 2. the existing Archicenter center. textures compatible A aeriials sample h� provided and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. J • t 01 Resolution No. Paae 2 ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. The proposed westerly (one drive approach) development to the west. drive approach shall be combined with the existing Archicenter APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JULY, 19B4. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of July, 1954, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r 1 LJ E 0 11 t I O Z V C7 .n Q i Q. E 40 B j U d G d^ A L '� 4- ` V a;JirL —due�u cEM� ~EO�i.a r ✓gvA�c� � Tn O� •' L O O` E i r e 9 P_ V9.n✓a.q AOO Gq ( c r � � V � ✓ Ll J J C Q V i b i V 9 69 f f I z 6 0 i 0 O 6 0 O V O O N N "J �^ T C� �• 7 C OA qD q d O d G >= V a y ` `6 _ NdV._ qq aTVpV O O C d'00 L Q�� Oar _nom L p�a�c OOa% ..•� EV I_J °N� .Oi�.°nrn Ep�O L V C T C✓ P D O T p { E � L w b O d d .o _• _ V c.°�o i Jai r T N L C H ✓ •Oa d E P� -Tn QC ^C�w dL�0 � ✓ ` i q L 6 O•_ �qa� Nu O ^7 A J 6 y V ^J 7 N GG V qpp q P � ✓ u � q 9quDJ _OVN naY r d T O �✓ N N� v L� 0 O A ^OVYw,. N "J �^ T C� �• 7 C OA qD q d O .Oi�- q V O q 9 p q C T C V u N O O y a y ` `6 _ NdV._ qq aTVpV O O C d'00 L Q�� Oar _nom L p�a�c OOa% ..•� EV O _ O c.°�o i Jai r q C L �•• � d N A J 6 q P C >C'1VO V qpp �q0 ^�� 9quDJ _OVN naY C✓ d^ �w A6 d� q� �dGOV` t AD N ^�V 6 rdiOP ^OVYw,. V Ni•n m�Q J e V `Cd�Nq CV r d� O u� gI� rI N{ m Z O t u W J ~ e v CTTTYXY... N � � 0 r z J + o O NIII Q �I A O O C t 6 9 c o � u a O Z W V V Y V i M N •• E Z �O F V .c M� �8 L O C d q V Q 6 7 A dv`O s u � no <d cor d e d Co O p E V_V_N 6A E w� d M L V r P✓ L � L NI YD I E'1)1}t a q r C c c 0 c FU V r 0 O O Wi u+ � c .°.ea4c�o0 O � n v � o n p��,nE✓ u �N L NNE_ N ■ ^ Y G C ✓_ r C G p L N N� G_N06'Z dOJ` > ° V _ N ° `oc ✓� —vim+" e' ✓=s �p�✓ =mac dD o L d O q C O N r_L O�qO O A PC4 +Y• Q 6 + C Q q> A N 1 ^L T L u u� -�oEE lN y eb `_s+o c`�r4v ° o u p d r V G✓�✓ N d d q p P G�✓ V G L� G L NL O7 ✓aP Q•Ji +,` p rV r M^ M9 ✓a�M Z N U Q i dOG Va °, >> ✓ O Y O r G r L V L p b d✓ _ L Y 4. OJ6r FVW a .b.. <a bL `CV LLV C -PfV., q VOA L LVC 9 L � ' 9 L r G O✓ y r C O r ` L ✓ O.O. �Fpi „2... � q ?x„ d g o mac,. °pNN ° ✓c. T r N'a N � � r ✓✓ ryyr C ., dr T < V 6�� 09 N •' i Cb M G .-. S d �' -J6 .Vn C O r� 0- >�✓ ! O� "� : P O L m O P U L N L C O C p r_ r✓ 1 _V r« G O L N i r O N- S �� G J rOaT .- ;72d VqG� ENVO •CL L G6= r'r WO,O =dW� =� =COQ ✓p QEL- VLJ �n .e V��„ _L O„ LC`N�O -G ONd T J T NC _ G .O _V9 E -pt� 9rr- T C d = Y G J y T� d V N Lorin � L� C V � C a y 0 d✓ H O ^✓ a -� L 9 �P.E ��d ip „ `rte -y�P dd✓ >' b 7L- - L C L a O N d q° r _� = c r 9 e i O N~ � Op -O- N ✓. a q w° dJ N rN d GyE oNL ✓EO P -Sr -- E -� NP`G C' P V O° V r r � Q) .L..V V J N „ G L O V✓ NCVO O P r V G V .0. q q✓ q J 2 w o L o L M i Y G V V✓_ V 2 V i a= L O C �' ✓ ✓� V N - V a 0- V T Elk G M ✓ j✓ b P L O C l V J O V ✓O�r ? 9df „ O yr= CY > PaF_ C_JGS ONGV q Or -� `b✓O.J L dOUN uL ✓✓�V -^ V]Adp Y�O.bN � PIrL CO �TO6 Vrr a�✓ Lr YO eC"E aia ^= r ¢ b- Nr.Jn .remit 22 u Z3 6V �NGOCL d G ^Pq ^ O 2 OC 6J6V Qr O 6S.rm •� NI ^' pl �I OI T V 1 CV I ✓_ a V b✓ L N J C O p �� „.L.r � C l'�. N y L W J 2 V G y S✓ W L C 9 r _V 66 � r v O O r� V= 9 G q � N V 6 Y r N „✓ '4 d a Q C V? O 2 C ..0 t < d G n C E _T t N O G O 6 a q e^ O u r^ E e O d - „dC ` a ne rzuC i 4�r e° 4N N Q aN jm q G d S 4 d V a N- _ V✓ 9� r V w C G G < r r -40 i-re _G a` V rG Nuq O� OC F5 - V f•J .°. vN C nPq 4z� ar =c y. iN V ¢ -'Oi M +s'' � =OOI Hd vG �p 6V CO y O N r= O O G rGgC 55 C d � !; _ l o r w _y O- o'LQ i LG• Y° ✓ N G t� V m L N V y G d C r N p r L rr O� ¢ a < u ar C O L{..' < p- J _ CSZ 4i Cq VIGO °p „ r 'fi tLG Nl° °c�c `q ca .°. .`.> .-.T O J ^do a c G Y �= 1'_pc ✓t 4 °° °� pit V °P -- ✓0.9NT yC _S V6r„ ^ ✓r FE GN -.Li -�” 6q C G6b C � i= V_J N =0 N N..'N✓q br V f°._ <FSL 4JOV V prt� pOJr eO F yC F�CIr IGV 7F C rVOt QNW NI dL L V ✓ P� „ „Oi0 N C L r N T O O< G P G C O O W G E Y° �✓ d° Y p V - 9 l 4 P �C� VP -rL L -r9V V>'P �ECN gTdG -�✓ r`'MG �t wo c = «n` rnai r.`.rc E= Q� aar < +a <Er6b Iz E Z Y U rJ O L G 11 u �L OV ^Q Up cc am ycc a - -i C` FL o -• r c -off u n u N� Go qs..�� a -- -m•. co cad viar_ _ �VOO u cT�,]i mom Dq. q�nL < dC cCy� V_ y�•y .YI d pJC tNp� r __p�L_ L r E? g r V q L V J r r •. I V C C` o g P r I � O r � C N i V.. L ] r' q C U .'n r L Y •��r I C 9 j y V C g G r 'I y C tJ -� q u i a. p o u y �� � �- n u o �� ° o O A r n I �` .•O. '� d 1 V q C -1 LtI V'Sq qNi ^� L �q96 > Li -J - Cq '� ViO P c .dam ,C L q Ur. C rC J .•.Vi' C �L q V�Y ML r -O N p � ]• u N .`e C C V Q r �. G� g0.0•r P p ni<q E V q L dNN+ n .rV OCrq LCDV C; •L. YaN Lrrr✓` LCd o c o co '"o �.°,... - °ar u � dy s w '^ q n° s �.. pro:. rdVq E uL_6C '." ` Vrr- X00 JCi _ar <_q ar C . a`u 610 O q,o,o c P d v `<CV iE I � .q` 9NE _• pC N Y 9 VL rN r V y b T .•<. O 6i P P N 4 ... L� •r � n9 E 9 .y L N= f L q U- O j v r 9 C� c oyJ'o'� L Ngr �= Av Pa qyO o � l u•pa 7rry NC6 P O q O CL V �N C Y_L. QC C` N V CC �T.d qa• 6CC '� �+.b.0 W Oar 01P000 g9 TPp•Oir ��I- d ACr grCd -L Cr LrNN q _r r L � r hq O aq�9r NLCV% N r •L..��Li ^ rc Lb��Y C �' a _P V y Vru J q q y y O m � C C 2 N S N V V 6 g r O G. Q �r 6 N F`- r 1] V r N N q J .✓ i F r q< Q �SVI W p d` L 6V<a -Cn d ^d9 dV qL ai C•. PV _ <- O �V c^ ry T l yC =t Cr^ 'pQ LprN r =�y =� PV q P dOV.' N OY i nu b< d �P 4o.q rr_ _Cr rr LOEPy � � Oe a Nn 6q� aNL „ OH a car .Ce� E� y� Lo idn> =� iS�aOV �� VTpC � N ern- A_.C'✓ O •Jq = Lr IO q` V .1 � q PV q ' >V O < M - i•�-Jr M- � p - f L V U C f = a m g d < �< r C L q V N � y V = N •.• r i q r JO A 9r Vr Oq d l� �Gd qp� -6 J� 0C N r L <qP dd�pLY �9�i° d1[ n� ny yI `R 4 a.0 N �t ••�= y C-•'= y-. p I L'a OC q _ _' O Tray d r O O N C O. T A y ` ¢< L C q C C d � Y> C •• C CCw. t d G - 7 O`�r0 bey - q ✓�' VV b<i .qwi =Nq O r. nUJ v Q^ <NON Ct A �u Td-•n Jqy� uN0 d6N MN <rC pq aCnC qJ CNUy q roP O •JI q'� ci 'q ��r� d�'O Yq r —•.o d_ o.cio v Mu _�qri_ E yi } .�`q qqo A�� pN •. a, �- P dal L -�V -Jr- SaP• 1q ✓rii NC qi0 rN q. Nr Cr u� PLO' V y ✓niN Nc �FVL W t O ari O` O� N N �' < O i �. t r 6 y O •� I � q V � .L.. 4 ... �= y CJ ` d ` i = ��� ^� O i `V • r�r q TWA lq ` CCy nLn N�a <q �ar> GC d� r < r r d g V q Q N d L N V n `pr y 6CN F. iY GC O q � 6 nti uV OnY Nr 6M^ 2N0 HNL z v 0 0 C; L G a O w _ V P L P f s� vc er 4 O. C O a4 i n ,o� o.` � o " b N N Q r 0 Y N C q pi r u N d C 4 u rr N q C� T i E 0 2 0 9 r r L C v L S S L GI F 0 j i G 4 L G C N 7p q E c T F %'Fdc2 OV c OC'�6 EVa LD FO r OO ma �� D VV r C 6 Ln W L �! '� � C = O d • W� N L 2i =VC 9SVLy G.. O Cr SV_ r d O r V p S q V O > V d q y 9 o� oF -` • „Gq M SY O WC GN V `V CN Ov .� VC 9 IQ S L V O u 0 •J N1 Nc q _Ey CQ ri_ L9G� °cL °6 r 9r "L f'E T9 �� C�u L v 4 °On VU ^u =L 1.2 rd O 6S s Y ` � N N qr v L P 6Cd E S N 9y Cy U �° S U N F . €✓ E r - L A G Ld. G V r= Z y r r .-. V C O O �' V LL 7 C N • � y M 9^ r q r! q pI OI N n Q � _ N � • y0 pt� r you r TV �Lj �s ryG.�Oy •' rO^ 4 �G S N i § EEN 9r I -g:5 G� ` VOe 9 �C =LCOa •.L a d= � � i O •' CO �Vrr r_� _ r Or Of O L 9 N i _ V�Of Edr 10 i O 0J°C Nu yy d 1 Or� L�M G9 d G Cc =LLV:n r4 J¢O � O vi E ^ e _ as ML• � n _ c� � d u N V < u - C ✓� 9p v P` V u i q ry° 0 r L Y° L u VLe rC u E 9 p w L .. .. N d I C C P O n L N .N NG` •'6'C OLL L frG qV`��O r r C M Z O O _ 9 > l 9 � �.•. _ 4 L V O OLO L d d NV �� N °Lr <� G 60N 90 NG 4L a4 L 09 L r 41e L `l Ld Sal t CC `rO Od CmL p= NEd _P = > pr EO N4 VO_ Nip" uT r y_ O Lr 10VC9 L � _ 'e N_ '^ •c„ i J y r c.• __ E � LO e C� � N r V r .L. 4ca `. CN.N.i� -co u� PEW L qc LLO p O E d O. ^ T J 4 O < 6 G V o Erg W W W E Z y do M1 r � m �c OL 6 I -' u PL c r o. �� 4 V 6 O r I n ^^ 4 I 1 �• i OI a O w _ V P L P f s� vc er 4 O. C O a4 i n ,o� o.` � o " b N N Q r 0 E Z v 0 i d 11 e U_ � q y. � OD C C ." N •I � V ✓ = V G^ � O P C U 9 i y T u V I L � •0 L d o L.- L N u O d A O O V wrr I N C C .V�. �°i• d d .r• w � 7 C T N 6 v L '.A d L U .✓i� C 9 N C 1�O i y A � � �• u S y 5r ✓o GD o o �" i N c -?dam E -+.. v ° °° o.• y cD °� C y° L AI L• r q T.N. N V i W� .V. tCEy D A p d A° PS O D 1 d � O q � � q C T` I d C S ` 6 r d^ �- I = 1' N N .°• N N Li• O ` „ l � •Ne C d O O T d C N = A J .� 2 O >• L 9 ° � A a `� C` 9 w S L✓ i G y S yd 6N _ °Pb CN Djr �� �C C.> D_ � .diAO dA yAW d.`. y =^ ca is Lc Ly _ _ ° °✓ �DG 4 r rv� bI Mme" r E•C• V^ Cw �qY�E C` > ^ -O N C9O9 W 9 O {°J c 2 N C 6 L ` � y N C l - O` V y .L. d •Ca CL✓ 6L 6 i 6 Q\ 1.1 T � _ V9 q E PL9d ✓du LO✓p. LOO COO ^�•O••L di 16 Ly.° C E TC.°. LCN� C��-`d•E .°+cC PYNyi �� c L °' e` -� L °VCV 9N d.• ° +V ° «d.^ WE p�9 4r. TV Ap .'•aO.NQ l L_60 __ 9 �o � '''� rA �•°•'_� cc � Nic w�oD Lm ° w q °A "ancq D`po ea � d✓o� °� cs -�L..A cs Pte, q °�La >�'. 7 ✓ =5 :o- uSC• .O A^ � di- LOT -'•Gr AC 9 d dV✓ qV✓t NdU '•V'd�� u� rn occ E q d T o` V y a o✓^ c N y E 6r V^ dN E • � °q i d ° -6 ° 0 CnE6 L dN ° -`nL `E�.°. - Ni -� i � a �v`•c �°.�q. -. �La +v�Nn� v d.N,. c °c - u•OG N °O" °`N- °:n N N P r u .. .J..L. .. °� c� d�9= A.L.a -°.n C9 .n °e,ce�c c -c .'. .�oa•�,S A O D D y N r ✓ q °✓ � 6 ° P O? . Q C •Li• y L N Q L�CGe �dN °y GO j -.d.d O ^G La ^ °' N - �.jOO PCPs NA CAN ��dC�r °� Cd° CI✓VyPY V� V +O � .Tid�✓� °V`N d4DCj ^9 =O �fl Ep l.d.. L A 0 y NJ v °EO.2. N Gd0> �O NTe P ra S V VO PA O CA•s Ci 06 ^6 ^L �L°� <O N` � 9Z ° A V N 9 y 00 r` D V < O� v r < S YOB ✓I Y 9 .� us W J e U .O i Q. Q a ° G W 0 E C E P 0 b t r � ° r .b. C E V c O ai G` C •ten nr L L O O i- p p M G N O i V pL t O\ V u 6 O N= 1 � i °SN p ..�� P c d r c•+A i �T-r.o`. 6 r a + x Cy O < or y o � N i NT r✓ aJ OW =nom V O n NS b � V° 02 rr = O'�Clr V Or V IN d r q O rCi �r O O y a n Pqt all oa � � i Mu ,`off q� E V C n � d P a a G/ L i E ✓� d 2 l M ° E L t° w P L d V V y"nW— q 6y � tpi O q d 9a i� r TLG P Et Lv yqn L �V `� ry r_r SOW Tv r v nN F W b u w z` 1-5 Wr Hi ly Zp Vp C �° O N r•� ^ ^ d q� 6� Q a ° G W 0 E C E P 0 b t r � ° r .b. C E V c O ai o„ i- > i V pL t O\ V u 6 O N= 1 � ¢J �T-r.o`. 6 a Cy O < y o � N i V b � m � IN all O V O V a q`N N p dr V m z r q a a -Ln V r C c V q T 'CLT VV �` Lr Or V� T 6L 'V Lam° 6C 9Q u0 x o r won �a 9c on W r rn V V O V N O G ue ci � a N 0 > i V pL t O\ N= 1 � �T-r.o`. a ..T• P e q q� 6� _> Z.2 ¢ V E 6NV NnW q� 6 G M r NOrr G N° e 0 0 O z t, V d O L G C W r I q t C a i gdo T I d r �= d I I q L N z c c � v _ PiY C ✓ V ^ d I r _Pr j ° °tom �� dq 4 o � d D e G ° L V i � D ✓_U _ C �� d _ NC 09 q_ _ � C✓ y N V .D.. V O OV ^• C rY•�y d° " ° cr N9 ^'^ i L �' gem ° ° N � � — q V •f L L L > V V y N DONa D V dP .dnd �N ^jW � `U L6E N C6 = G ^ T ° V O Y � ✓ ° ° Pi•°e w °v =d9 y S� NN D c D I �` v ;v o G p— N C q' ✓. O y N� °ry — V > G 6 q N= O C P V P r q ° V � -" N 6 N C q G r. p✓ Qi7 IW C — O_ ✓J E q q t �. d� rd LV > d d T y 4 +� p O N ✓Ir F !✓ G 7 �-VV <— » p7 d U Q -17