No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/11/28 - Agenda Packetyn -. 'c- CITY OF RA\CF0 Ci;G \ \i0 \G T` !iNG Co,'L% 1ISSIGN v iz AGENDA .977 WEDNESDAY NOVEAMR 28, 1984 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARK COMMUNTfY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ACT I 0 t_1 L Pledge of Allegiance IL Roll Call APPROVED 3 -1 -1 Commissioner Barker X Commissioner Chi +iea -T- Commissioner MCNiel= III. Aimouncements IV. Public Hearings Commissioner Rempel X Commissioner Stout 7•— The following items are public hearings in which concerned h?dividuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shalt be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. A. APPROVED 4 -0 -1 B. AL J.1.1..11 0- -if INVESTMENTS - The development of a 43,992 square foof commercial shopping center with retail shops, fast food restaurant and gasoline service station/convenience market on 5.44 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commercial District located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Base Line - APN 202 -181- 27. oY—ad - rsgitvIAKLAN - A revision to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit to allow the development of a caretaker's residence in conjunction with a mini- warehouse facility on 11.03 acres of land in the General Industrial ? . category (Subarea 1), located on the west side of Vineyard, between Arrow and 9th Street - APN 207- 262 -44. APPROVED 4 -0 -1 C. With added condition clarifying that Amethyst Street will be improved prior to occupancy of structure and condition that buffering be provided . along property line adjacent to mobile home park. CONDITIONAL USE PER1iIT 84 -36 - HUTCHISON - The development of a second dwelling unit within a garage on 14,000 square feet of land in the Low Medium Residential District, located at 6897 Amethyst - APN 202 - 121 -01. APPROVED 4 -0 -1 D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -21 - ALTA LOMA Staff also directed CiiRISTIAN CHURCH - A request to convert an existing to prepare a memo to 1,868 square foot single family residence to an office for the Co =ission outlining Alta Loma Christian Church on .25 acres of land in the Very Church's compliance Low Residential District, located at the west side of with original CUP condi- Sapphire, across from Orange -APN 1062- 332 -23. tions of approval. V. New Business E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOFIAENT APPROVED 4-0-1 REVIEW 84-48 - PACIFIC SCENE - The development of an with a- iendments to 80,000 square foot office/ warehouse multi- tenant industrial driveway approach widths driveway Utica and 6th Street. park on 5.75 acres of land in the General Industrial category (Subarea 11), generally located at the northeast corner of 6th Street and Utica .Avenue - APN 209 - 411 -17. VL Director's Reports REPORT RECEIVED F. REVIEW OF UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING POLICY i Commission provided staff with VIL Public Comments direction to pro- ceed with amendments. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appecr on this agenda. 9:55 P.M. yam_ Adjournment The Planning Commmsion has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items. go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. 1977 `tFl CITY OF Rj3LNCHO A�CC'C vj \��'IO_ f GA N ( {TSS N Z _AC;CN 'IA WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 28, 1984 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA L Pledge of ARegi=ee Commissioner Barker Commissioner Chitiea Conimissiorer McNiel- IV. Public Hearings Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Stout The following items are public hearings Ln which concerned undividuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PER7dIT 84 -13 SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS - The development of a 43,992 square toot commercial shopping center with retail shops, fast food restaurant and gasoline service stationlconvenience market on 5.44 acres cf land ir. the Neighborhood Commercial District located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Base Line - APN 202 -181- 27. B. ENVIRONMENTAL A,%SP- RgM1iNT AW) [`0WnrrinNAT. IMP C. rnn:vua 0'*-Zf - UAMMAVIAN - A revision Lo a prevlousiy approved Conditional Use Permit to allow the development of a caretaker's residence in conjunction with a mina - warehouse facility on 1L03 acres of land in the General Industrial category (Subarea 1), located on the west side of Vireyard, between Arrow and 9th Street - APN 207- 262 -44. 1.1J1VU111Vr1AL U5t YF.KMIT 54 -36 - HUTCHISON - The development of a second dwelling unit witun a garage- on 14,000 square feet of land in the Low Medium Residential District, located at 6897 Amethyst - APN 202 - 121 -01. D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -21 - ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH - A rejuest to convert art existing 1,368 square moot single family xesvienc: to an office for the Alta Loma: Christian Church on .25 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District, located at the west side of Sapphire, across from Orange - AP" 1062- 332 -23. V. New Business E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-48 - PACIFIC SCENE - The development of an 80,600 square foot officefwarehouse multi - tenant industrial park on 5.75 acres of 'and in the General Industrial category (Subarea 11), generally located at the northeast corner of 6th Street and Utica Avenue - AC N 209 - 411 -17. r TTF —. F. LEVIEW OF UTiL1TY UNDERGROUNDING POLICY VIL Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VUL Adjournment The Plarming Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that tune, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. I'I Tf SyUr S - cu.srl t1._n .c W.s PA;./ 11 Ell DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCA_tiZONGA STAVE F REPORT November 28, 1984 Chairman and Membe.c of the Planning Co- mission, Rick Gomez: City Planner Dan Coleman, Associate Planner USE PERMIT IRM I�.wv�:cc 11tVraJI -Ir"IZI - Ine aeveIOpmenr of a 43,992 square feet commercial shopping center with retail shops, fast food restaurant and gasoline service station /convenience market on 5.44 acres of land in the Neiahborhood Commercial District located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Base Line - AFii 202 - 181 -27. I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of August 22, 9�4, denied a req -n!st for , Conditional Use Permit for the above described project. The primary issues discussed by the Planning Commission and the findiros for the project's denial were: o Lack of pedestrian orientation /amenities; o Strip commercial versus group of organized uses and structures: and o Lack of a strong, consistent architectural theme. The City Council, on appeal of the Planning Commission denial of the Conditional Use Permit request, reiterated the Commissicn's concerns and directed the applicant to go back through the design review process and revise the project to conform to City policies and standards. The Desiga Review Committee reviewed revised plans on November 1, 1984 and felt that the pedestrian plaza area and intersection of Base Line and Archibald needed additional treatment. Therefore, the Commission continued this item to November 28, 1984 to allow the Design Review Committee to continue working with the applicant to resolve these concerns, This report presents a summary of the changes to the project and the recommendations of the Design Review Committee. ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 84 -13 Novembcr 28, 1484 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: 11 A. General: The latest site plan, Exhibit "J ", has been revised to include a plaza area between Buildings "A" and "B ", which will include planters, seating areas, and an overhead trellis structure. A texturized pedestrian walkway is proposed to convenient pedestrian access from the north end Of t. ".e site t_o Building "D ". A stronger pedestrian focal point has been provided by utilizing the entire area between Buildings "A" and "B ", as shown in Exhibit 1100. The latest elevations depict a Mission architectural style. The roof element has been strengthened and wrapped around the building sides. Further, the new architectural concept has been consistently applied to all buildings. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee has worked with the applicant to reserve the primary desion issues regarding pedestrian orier.tation, site planning and architecture. In terms of the site Flan, the Committee recommends approval subject to expansion of the plaza to encompass the entire area between Buildings "A" and "B" to provide a stronger pedestrian focus and separate the pedestrian circulation and activity from parking areas. Further, the Committee recommends that future Buildings "D" and "E" be combined into a single building footprint. Architecturally, the Committee felt that the proposed Mission style created a stronger, consistent architectural theme and recommended approval. However, the Committee also recommends that Building "B" (Del Taco) needs the following revisions to be consistent with the other buildings: 1. l.rched colonade treatment on front ,levation, 2. Covered trellis structure on north and south sides perpendicular to building, and 3. Replace red - orange ceramic tile Tiding with a more subdued the color. The Committee recommended that a decorative tiie treatment be used as an accent throughout the project. C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. Staff completed the Environmental Checklist, visited the site, and reviewed the traffic study. Based capon this review, staff has determined that the project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts. A7-2— 11 L' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 84 -13 November 28, 1984 Page 3 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. The proposed development plan, together witi, the recommended Conditions of Approval, is in compliance with all applicable City standards. In addition, the project will not be detrimental or cause significant adverse environmefital impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCEt This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices . were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. V. RECOMMENDATION: Design Review Committee recommends that the Planning Commission approve this project through adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval and issue a Negative Declaration. submitted. City Fanner RG:DC:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Exhibit "C" - Radius Map Exhibit "D" - Previous Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Previous Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Grading Plan Exhibit "C" - Previous Elevations - Building Exhibit "H" - Previous Elevations - Building Exhibit "I" - Previous Elevations - Building Exhibit "J" - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit "K" - Proposed Landscape Plan Exhibit "L" - rroposed Elevations - Building Exhibit "M" - Proposed Elevations - Building Exhibit "N" - Proposed Elevations - Building Exhibit 00" - Plaza Details Initial Stu,!y, Part II Original R�_.solution of Denial "An "B" "Cn "An "B" "C" Proposed F.esolution of Approval with Conditions A -3 E 0 0 Q NO I �11 c :x I ti I CITY OF RANCID CUCA.MONGA PLANNING DIVISION rr>rM: - Tt i -E- ELI A► EXHIBIT _ SCALE= o i E r .. JI Jl. ~I�u77 1 Ito /IV El f 4v4' = j(df us ^; 314 L'S t12tM1Ie, ra1iJS ^-! 2, ZaO cl,'s S* Ll�5- NORTH CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCA-jvjojXGA TITLE: _ PLANi1II�TG DIVLSKA�1 t.XHIFIT:C_SCALE =-4-%_ZdM E AiTiI 067A *ice TlrGO t � zi It A 4' ` __41• 1 I� P ;1-- -t( 11'77 al ml 7 � ��- II' 11 i• L��V� r I I I• _ L , ' I ��7,I -1T .[3• =q �-i I .L _. �Z - -r1J I � I °a ! x� =�.�• --?', ^'III "' II, �,- ,� I I1 `IIILIII'I fpm ` �f I Io ! e= 1 9 LhilliI — o— „�— ;J4 gym.. <- .....,. �-..� <....... A IMA ckfo %moo- CITY OF ITEM— �t0�2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PL.ANMl� DRrNQN ExHiBIT- scALE: �- 7 p Mr"rrJYWJw Lt. Zl -- wl 1 jG �i C —r �J GROUND COVER TREES ..��•. \� \• CM�JY. LI.1gWn M �A i z. SHRUBS y L7 . t.N• r -1 IMNMa•.J K,� GROUND COVER TREES ..��•. \� \• CM�JY. LI.1gWn M SHRUBS . t.N• IMNMa•.J K,� GROUND COVER v r. i � �J,• -Sr� 197 IIII II 1 ��_ �J, 1 III' 'ljllTi Illli:llllllll ` Li C OADC LIw[! ROJ�O� —� —' _ 1 ti ,t .O ei IK.r. b auJr CITY OF [T'EM: ojp Ste- m? RANCHO CUCANMO` EGA ,-�: iF yp ��m n ANNiT s DIVIS CkN EXHIMT- SCALE: •�--- U I] ..��•. \� \• CM�JY. LI.1gWn M v r. i � �J,• -Sr� 197 IIII II 1 ��_ �J, 1 III' 'ljllTi Illli:llllllll ` Li C OADC LIw[! ROJ�O� —� —' _ 1 ti ,t .O ei IK.r. b auJr CITY OF [T'EM: ojp Ste- m? RANCHO CUCANMO` EGA ,-�: iF yp ��m n ANNiT s DIVIS CkN EXHIMT- SCALE: •�--- U I] �A :1 I M. -Z e, V� i �i ,i:. i r= i'i i O� �a c ss� ED q _ - 4• 41 -- snecubc :o.C� %� rUTIM crry OF mm: CAR 0 a s PLUNININV3 DrVISL N E�iaE RT: - SCALE: •••— II I `oI N Z* . 41 ra T s9mw AV EXHIBM SCALE- L I. E ri N Z* . 41 ra T s9mw AV EXHIBM SCALE- L I. E 0 E 0 U'mA0? .e.a. i FRONT BUSHY $so'DZc 1 IN Le66HV �rF ry..� fiAa Iia�. C�r1f. 4. ✓YIY�1Q 1 ��.f/1•NA �/w�f VY� �� .+N N• ate. �r AF.✓ Ellv RUGOA __ELEVATIOPM `pG� %...Ei noRrri CITY OF PLANNING DIVISION rmN, l- ?PA.I 944- m TTr ,E: • ft EXHIBM SCALE- •�- P -// U 1 • G�A•s SE. CLtvsjlo++ a S70P n GO f - A �m -L• CITE' OF RANCHO C[�CAT'NIO \'GA rrEM: _�� $ - TITLE: EXHIB;•T =_.X- SCALE: -- R E 0 it ,�, �—,"} L�.� • —t : �_ z t, :�� of ��lN 3A'I lrp.w]11" 1` • 1. N y c• I jt 4Z ed si Y o + .a i ili a' O• e i i : • e i - -M I m w w w , y a �•� i 9 flNll� V C'IV�IM)1tV Hill 1-51- t 'y 4 3 < < a V 0 r t of x� I r T '6 9 r( � i� Z 3 'tl O � :t t� Q Q 9s c� 1? 0 i i- �e r u � 3 0 t� 4 0 F- 71 Ll S 11 .f 4 { a :G ■ �r -, MhES q { • � T r; .Ei 3 C? i .WN : > ', _ r .. . .. _ , .;;. �'; ,,, ,. V �1 �..'F ' =. 3 ♦., + �. i; . �:. i 31 cl Li i a K, � 7�j mm I a IE .ic § / / \ } � k ! ! . � / 5 � l4 )% y.� - - • - � .�� & -- y m> Z• � « £� �i P - ./og � eq �\ �\ a ; � � | | §j §�§ < ! a ; � 0 El 11 C C CITY OF RANCHO CUCA:YONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE:_ " U APPLICANT: FILING DATE: LOG NUMBER: --le- -e44-. r PROJECT LOCATT_ON: E� V I. ENVIRO\1,1ENTAL IIVACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe' answers are required on attached sheets). 1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground cox,ditions or in changes in geologic relaticnships? b. Disruptiins, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c. Change in tot -)graphy or ground surf:ucc c••ntour intervals? d. Th^ destruction, covering or modification or any unique geologic or phys -cal features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditcns? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition.? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic '-azards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground °ailure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resqurce? Z. HYdrelogy. Will the proposal have significant results in: YES MAYBE NO — L a. Constant or periodic air ei_ssions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Dererioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? i C. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribi.iion, or number of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare — ur endangered.species of plants? f **.• Page YES MAYBE No a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? / b• Changes In absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the race and amount of surface water runoff? � —_ -- c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface :cater in any body of water? e. DS.scharge into surface water-,, or any alteration oZ surface water quality? 0 f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? / i g. Change it the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality Quantity? / h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise zveilable for public water supplies? L i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? _ 5. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air ei_ssions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Dererioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? i C. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribi.iion, or number of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare — ur endangered.species of plants? L -J r Page 3 YES MAYBE NO c. introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural / production? Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction c' the n =bens of any unioue, rare or endange:_d species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or / wildlife habitat? S. Povulation. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human popu3ation of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Plannini Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental / entities? C. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing cons=Ptive or nor. - consumptive recreational opportunities? P _ n 3 r� r IL YES MAYS-- NO 8. Tr,:nsnortation. Will the proposal have significant results Page 4 a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? / b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion s3stems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people anal /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water -borne: rail, mans transit or air traffic? / g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, Paleontological, and /or historical resources? 3.0. Health. Safety and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explo =ion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organises or the exposure of people to such organises? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? P-2*V L J C Paze 5 YES u4TB: NO 40 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? / b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 1 ?. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? C. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? / f. Flood control structures? / g. Solid waste facilities? h- °ire protection? i. Police Trotection? J. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? L m. Other governmental services? G 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have sign-ific.aut results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fue_ or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing / sources of energy? — c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources cf energy? / d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? / t r.. e. Substant ?al depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural rescur_e? 1G: '_ierdatory Findin3s o£ Si ^ni£i^ance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the qual,.ty of the environczent, substantially reduce the uabit:jt of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife ;population to drop beieta szlf sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plan, or animal coa=uunity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the =ajar periods of California history or prebistory? Does the projecz: have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the er✓irowment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will eneure well into the future). c. Dees the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable =ears that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Page 6 YES MAYBE 140 l X 1 Ii. DISCUSSION OF ENVIROMSN-IAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). / (� qCnW �Pl - g.G' 44- ae� 7 - e 5 �.� l'• J III, DETERMINATION Sm the basis of this initial evaluation: 7---1 I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment„ and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect �—� in this case because the mitigation measures described or, . an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL RE PREPARED. ElI find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the envir:aent, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT PWPORT is required. Date 11 s;: Signature Title Page 7 l �- RESOLUTION NO. 84 -83 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MO. CUP 84 -13 FOR A SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND BASE LINE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 9th day of July, 1984, a complete application was filed by Sycamore Investments for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of August, 1984 the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public nearing to consider the above- described project. follows: NOW. THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings cannot be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -13 is denied based upon the following facts: 1. The proposed site plan is inconsistent with the policies and intent of the wltneral Plan regarding pedestrian /bicycle orientation, and Development Code Section 17,10.030 FS(e) requiring vehicular and pedestrian coordination. 2. The proposed site plan is inconsistent with Develcpmerit Code Section 17.10.030 FS(b) that requires shopping centers to be "planned as a group of organized uses and structures*. 3. The proposed architecture is inconsistent with the intent and purpose of Development Code Section 17.10.060 C2(a) requiring a recognizable design theme that is harmonious to surrounding developments. w Resolution No. 84 -83 Page 2 4. The proposed site plan is inconsistent with the landscaping policies of the General Plan and Development Code Section 17.10.040 C2 and 3 requiring a certain number and location of trees within parking lots and against buildings. 5. The proposed site plan is inconsistent with Development Code Section 17.12.040 C4 requiring provision of locking bicycle facilities. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 1984. PLANNIWx-%RMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s ATTEST 0 'Ri k Goy ez, I, Rickl Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of August, 1984, by the fcllowing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Li CHITIEA, BARKER,fiCHIEL, STOUT REMPEL NONE A -29 F �J RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -13 FOR A SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND BASE LINE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 9th day of July, 1984, a complete application was filed by Sycamore Investments for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of November, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can he met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Cote, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Deve`or ;vent Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on November 28, 1984. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -13 is approved subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. That approval of the future phase in the easterly portion of the project is conceptual only and specific site plan and architectural review is required. 2. Future buildings "D" and "E" shall he combined into a single building footprint and designed consistent with the approved Mission architectural style. i_ 3. Future building pads shall be temporarily seeded and irrigated for aesthetics and erosion control. fi — so Resolution No. Page 2 4. Provide teicurized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles to create an integrated pedestrian circulation system. in addition, sidewalk connections shall be provided to the public sidewalks on Archibald and Base Line. 5. Provide licking bicycle facilities in a convenient location. Details shall be inciuded in the landscape plans to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 6. Provide pedestrian connection near Building "B" to the adjacent residential project. A lockable gate may be permitted for security purposes if .raster keyed for the adjacent residents in Tract 11797. 7. Pedestrian amenities shall be provided within the plaza, including, but not limited to, outdoor eating areas, canopy shade trees, raised planters and benches, drinking fountain, and water element. Details shall be included in the landscape plans to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 8. Special landscaping treatment shall be provided at the intersection including a raised planter and annual color ground cover. 9. Provide decorative tile treatment as an architectural accent throughout project and in place of red - orange Del Taco ceramic tile. Samples of the decorative tile and roof the shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 10. Building "B" shall be revised to include an arched coionade treatment on the front (west) elevation and covered trellis structures on the north and south sides perpendicular to the building. ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. Project shall be limited to a maximum of two (2) drive approaches per street in locations to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2. Cross slopes on circulation aisles shall be maximum 4 %, except where specific aisles do not have adjacent parking. 3. Ribbon gutters across drive entrances are to be at an absolute minimum and all drainage must exit the site in standard under - sidewalk drains. A -3/ Resolution No. Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Vice Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of November, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: A -32 V U a 7 i d 0 ✓ i += = 0 4 4 T> L. .nOC LU�r�J q 4r U qu y6iu O -.0 A j ^ N E a O V —OF 4 an V O C y n y r C Y ^ q Y V G N W L' L qV J4 V �Ou C PL q u q q C O A�rN �V µ ••'n'O •- ���aLO� VNgr OQ �,�.�H�LO Vr•_e p C V q >•OOUr qn'`G rr '• - •'•c O V V W pd C O y— V O _•Oi•L aLiV OJ` N� O W i N C H 2 � V V Q o i H H z N i 0 v H O Ct J l gcoA .D 9o�c_ No �. ua_ -.4 ea.✓ G• V q 9 O O V { A N A t- .� V ✓6 C6 �. rC9 c$a�c O q o n L r. E _ O J ✓ L' L. U 9 6 q V✓_ S -5:; L r U 6 P C r •• O W V L c G S >• 4 a°i = T a P L° E C_ b_` <Li C` E° F •Gn G O °J C qVY nVV r rN ° 2E I + > u qy r`-j Ar q ✓n Cq 4 Q cV � + o i 5;'K � K aiC r T ✓ _ L p✓ T O N U N L_ V E V J✓ G '� O A 4 C j O q C '^ e° • V O C C L« �CGGr C�� LO. (y9�N CJ >•� 6�_CDi J ^C�. •� O O >^ O N F g G V« �^ 1 N l` � d L L L �CV�6 �� q 4 q V G Z'_ O O 9 6 ✓ r C C V N N C p C IOUC 4 y O O= 4 4 q« C C ^ C -+r O C D d✓ q u N ^ J V G C y A r° j q r /Gj N r 4 M q _ V C N y N L° 4 O ✓__ « 4 V ' V> r l CC VV _ _ _ T ✓ L q4 O O O a r 6 V 6 w_ 4 LLV 9 c O r 9 o <�64 L C 4 N q N b i m G Y- 4 q P✓ <. 0 r 4 r OC 9DL' 7 0 C C 4 A V. r V ✓ > �� � q9�; _Y ■ V✓ —0 C_ C «C -2.2 C Y« c > 4 V � _ L w = 9V 4V ° Uwe u `✓ ` YN_ q T L O✓ A Q C C 4 g G �= q C_ She C VG ✓Ol °�Qr�. ° 2 C r p G N q � �Vj G O✓ N CL q L ✓ � '°� s ��agDr qr S 4NU P V N 4 ✓ _L 4 L NG `��FP94 w 2 G C I-q 6_ Nq NA ON N Y n = = L ✓_ Y zu 'c F <V A- 33 N, N OS -° C- PO�NOr C d -dTYVV o °r F�u ub �r _ °..L�r °� _ av 4dv cuee CND+ ra gd a doh \. •NNa �`��G�'•diG Y.4��rO N NT + wt4 _ -C.. �NNLI N+ V��� O_• •o dO uNN CNN La VVVV w V 80 +�+ Vr NV O 6a Ocr =rN < d•O• G9 � �y •°0 9 � SO G • VLV 9S�r Cn� O9 C•Y VO ✓6 •• V�� w o S9+ NL W 7 96G�NOF d _d` 615 Z ap/N rard d�bC `NLII 4r- 9r4•C -r TJ O�t yL•�� Cq9 +� cL(•. -J u of n ° � � TTTi L G .. i� a_' oN °cp i o' do •� VN `L' TJr N =GC. •-" � L 4 - >4 -C- 99 °L d- �TL I..YV 'a � 4Y�° OVC }p,0 V A„ Rd L• 4 c M O w� ^N V• --r•C 4r L C- O •� V r• « 9 _ N lrV` ��LNq -C�N> Ty S Y Nq•/r ^ •q V • V �.�OL _Vb C,. rC ��•Lr• 9 d 6J CV�� C� a N C C CO l L r C q' [ q N� r � E'q° >•° 9 9 4 4 ��� L r L 4 r n n. O. L V �• S >� N O N q 9 C q r V •- i N =c_i>o r rj 9 q O ru_ i C 9 0 d C d i a °r N `sue v� � -nN p �.�? _mac T +aVi�V�r u•y •.� L Y cM •+ _d 4 _`U �Lb9d NC ._ NN GN Od dr ur -N EVd 1° a. 'ya dr �a50a r N w� -O Y ^ +Or•�, q MSL 4O P y i V N Y r- r V• � G r •pr• r d � i ^ N� i Y � 0 rn uq • MO G: 9�rr�Q 4JN dra° P cr' _ -O y l C C.�O• Wtr- -� LyY += qJ� drN OO ro„ pi � �i�'� �C.�VV =�J� i�`� O•a0. �' rN� L i_`C n�.nr 4 - S V 7 u�Nt E v ••e� cEa` V q C •N• V~ N C � 8 w •dr• r4n q G _ N U l C Z rq�WV •VO _V•°.r YAP °00 qrq J Nq °N�� �Jq� 4L P F r > r d �_ C F. P2) ` O C O N = O r ••'f - 4 C S PD Z= t 6 r• l °t C fi G _ V V •9e r Q u°iV V� N %Nw Ia Zw RO � CO�JC�CI WC Er dC r_PS �i G °_ �•V �w dV C• 6� N4 � 6 � j G _ �C �J °V (�•Ji•O 6 N.`3 ^ V v• Luc ^�� c v -� a.L. -'.�.� d.,:r rr4c _o •N"go'cO r9 nC tl•°.•- 4'J S V Ll C t� �•�r `r �- L. C � •n d N V S^ L i� C C d. 6 •Lr• C� d n6N O � A� rnd NBC - V °�tLO ur'C� E «rC O i'O ^.O aN�[�OYip+ 4VC +E VJ>• O ^l CVONL °y�O ^N � .TrC +� V -_ G E O 4 V V Q o O 4 V. y C g r i- E M N ° o• p iVa C�> u �'r VNr •Li•�ggN .n CC` r�Clr9 - -Nq �' +> W^ L P q q= C = = - M O V C - W •tea N o OE Z.- n_ rqV° Jar G'P _ HV rnOa VC CO °4 r/ 4 q L l r N O O C r4� - l L C N ` y - •• P G CON - N G r •• d ••• C G F q" O O• J 6 C O L _ O V l p V p _ NE.. N "w r O d r- V' L C s °a � be o� � yn �YCt �a- - cG• > n�'``N a'"•C o =�° i pw• V >V J F N .�� CL 't•��r N_ OCV C'N p 6C9q- O uL JSa C °V �Nti WOi- A�NO•a^q Cibr °y L J N L d O C•' C w`° C i C TE�OOr 9 0 9 0 S•r•CN .'•E> i 9CLLr {s� • q 4NL >dP l° C Cq V<CO•a O N N ODIC lC M N O O V_ +:R � q c � _ Y C Vb•rC T =C �VJ� G.VV NL°. L =y V'rnC.� Cd C�i CCM = ui.°1 �ornN -�� r «rgG.r = i•_c_ va u c c� - �b co 5 -`� >�a= jL. `�i ni E Vic• Nam c.V -oN •N VOy CO"n Eir C�� ~6Y N••CNO S' V Vn C= =c S «a VS?rG c ip�.00c V a b P r_ D O� C q f• G G C C� C > q �� • Y E y - L =' q__= C a Vy °rG'f �L- ONC' LVC TC6V NU6 G?V� O�> Cr! -w0. NO G- y NN1 -� OLr rV 76V q•Li.•P�L VOOi -Ly dSL MbN �C°narEO N + 9 V L L V w C+ V y W L ' ^L •� v y P V O O.••• m r •O � 6 ci O c T N d p c C J+ O t N C 4 V N N v. c .. N q r c d G^ D' a pM W 4 V N b p �aO ONO N O N N v — •-•rLV 6 N j N W y El f 00 i[9d� E J A +OL�r = d O c y O o �. � O .9 Y•u C V N v L + c r .D a,rr T or °r L E t F u J q a °SAC D� iN'>^o ry V R l h? d -• S C V q :. ^ ar N O V v rLC N.r V_NrV p J`— q•r O V N •� �V --c OCO —1 < +�p4 6V WO +O.N m T O �y�Ty a v` .W. Q�G O V l Y 7 ]y O — L Am W PA V � _ T• � Y q a — O � C N L a T WL�.V�. q G S Syr r r a o i c L ^^ c J N e c M= r V A 6 M -• tK V � .O• O i c s L u a d CGq +O b TJ r qAq ^^ .•'w s 9 dLi 9Nr. l 9 L b�T r y W — W r arc d 0 C b y �• 9 u� w j- V� NT V O 'o r •y O 9 y 9 O p b p V W L A d 6 pia b�N� O — T u• v A Y •ca C W N c b W — L V�r rTJ .• N � c C -6� d�•N� •V N > A � C p.Li 0 g 6 V O ° N L p•9E 9ci'e c V + c qW c4 ' wcr `..T Opp c-.... V N O V^ q J E^ �.pac•°or W Cl) i G 0� 6 + p C— E O D Y �+ D O �•� C O O� C N Y ° p b0.c O. L Np^. c• �— N _ Vry `• Ac L 7}• r °r. ND Oq ..O 4 — C G OO wW iS = < N � a aN rro cc •e LS •` wY �a 00 N - s._v... — +� °.r +Cr ^ a0i V �NCd +9 - -�� N ANN e ` `� •V•F N� c . wr D. —iaL N.b.Y `�°•�•< fu.•o• 'byW p �^ a �� c� c' �^ L ewt"d.. N v`u =� — •` r .v r yp 4 ps °.J. c'.�cc� bd° —°9 � L up. 4 � a:� ` . _ _ .. R r g A r 'O L •n V .e I N O y O >.� c j l O L u ` w� E S V O W > f N O N 9 L O A V 2' � c O a A �✓ r 4.Or C O C 'r' y r^ O ^+V — r tC 4 ' 0 OVOO � � L\ r •' L'J'.: Y. .• > q Oq V V �_= — Dr —N.4i• tr�� an^ .n\ . N. T CC .• V O c L O r O' —AV `6y4 ``` O C= Gc ws "LV r Y �' -Y i b.Ne O� -•cam V <V A` � NVG —�+ KO _ d 7...4 9Arp �wc —G O4 i.ri•L E4w =0 =ri yyr N` �, T <ON tip, <y 60 SON —+ QNpo WV.Ji•O O pi N —N AN 6Nr SNO HNL y `� ``l f �I �I • s+ I �I� � I �i • � W � -3S w- w —o cc La= � aw pN oI E _e E _ J T _l y u °• F C a � w Om a P` C V { V O a C L •+ W C O- _ 10 C O D d •G. 6 v yl � �` y • N p •71 ^I r ?. V 9 G c =dd ._ w` i p v C `p r � F V a' 0 O 4 r C O .� • a O A U 9 `O L C Ir O��.�uD. =PL99 ri•r�N d �`. PM —P Oj y •�. j Op _ r L�� l G q LL r C� S O w a ^ ��— C .Di S W r` a r •_ y 9 O_b C•J G�L �� FA' p - E —� 4p Lt]GT lV p orb 4 b y. LL rI f V ^— _. G •�.. V i3 L �. {� = V. A d •Ve a C_ O y— O W W O'99 p�u c �. W« cZ d aP ace �9 eP ou �p�° iu .7Z M j q �J O y. C� V p n_ n• 6 O bN' oz= n W o � v. L vC 9 O L u.� C rI � •O D' ` C a. _ OI �IWL L.a 4A lL VVI 6�q� U p p_ 97oM 1 aD�6i OI p ti �a r J C q y e• .w >• + lr« • HL TZ.!: 0 �•O p 9 a a0i CVO' c rz IV OCV t C - LL _CC• T n q •, G � L C 9r Ow r 6GC N < y •^L tt` r 4 a• � —�- ^0 p C .n u ✓OE IpVV .� � O p•_d rO =p Clew ✓N O� V9q � d r dVt _ r a Y 9 < «� � r 6 0 N. ali F O. L � V Y• q e a T y V M •n O• q V L 6 •� ^ i V r i W C i L C N•_ G r �':` rO Cv i c _PCOC VOa a wP �o Aqy r_ t Q.+ Cyr ... c nco f M ., V N G L WE .Fi•r «� T. —bail GC ":W Cv �dl y •', V >VY 091E w� id wiG O 6i rd O. L<r _ f_V VO Cnz LLS.w E� O' _w'� Va« 9 �aO L •Or .vi.�i 11 •2'L t. �(� Vii ..n6 io9oc «wc r L r lwP i� Vr. TOi i0 —'! VV•iv v VVie «��pyy -J q_ tV wC PEt =9 O « V = • • `r lY a. G Cf p_ O dC Qm' VC Gm Ci 9 O y 4 k C V> a y L 1 L V 4 ` V � W C Y 6 d�� ti 9 � C 4� 6 I ' r b� y L •• P \I I � I I iL1LN0 F�•�q 1 lt) �• G r a •N• O� P O rj J°� T y V_po d co qo � `•• Z• L Z L 6 FgT_ Y`Oj �O c L.¢�n 6 � Vn rL o f � � •.? U` v y Y P O N L. L � 4 4 •'.' a G y O N L� L, d .� - ' O ` O '.J O I L w e •e n t= c O Ca ` L ,^n O. C ^> r L jlo t O r j —� q 4 uL y NC —bn0 — E V G r.I, � d b� C 9 c v 2 q . 6 2 L r F y •• y -o wii c e= �a °: •^mod o.L d � _ - � o• u.E O � I oLL -' we�rc •^ 'si � se 4'N�$ Q° - _T� O ' •r O ^J ^ _ 11 ° U O � At°i +O4 O °T Y P° •' —' ° cor i � E Nr c �a°i� n c ` La ` L • -C: OT � c � =u t �_ PO O y n r� Y N W N L i W � V O _ L` •- 6 a — 4 � N O O � i _ ` 9 n O .� V` n � r O r 7 Y t <f u• P cp N C r eP O•r � IN VQ 6n I yCw yL° n CYd •C w <9 w q� QQL`W1 � 4°JI9rwC CL \v, Oq � PLCO a•CT Or - CV 9f.GC •• =`C� n4r Or +�� �00 c00 w � � °+ °�� °'P ° .4. >�� Lam+ c ^ -¢,g � - _•,o a _c i c a qL- tlrNr •'9e� -L�rL ,c wY4�o is Po _ L.n+�o sae s n`� y9Lia `M� d..�m s'O G oc.v a r4o,•a .•` s+o4`� a P .Y w O,u06 CC p ��T�C •.• r PO ^y0 i� G O L L Y u G O L L� � e O � � Y °� q T y =` L O� 4 4 r C ,C Q r L L •t.• d L� _ qy P M l'O� tl 42 rNCV -G C y ` � O L N� � L` T � •J i � - O 4 y ` O n L+ b P L= y y N L = r c� V y L- 6 S L P 4arr n •Ln �� 4 gnG9 • `Vrq L Crj C�°r.~r L g+ 4 — 4 96• E �O r i C�rC � e � e•'• E •= �•+ +' +� 4 a : •' ° ` i e � ...'^. •• of y .e � ouL= ai N! � +LU•=., �.• °ou `c� :ooF °nom Z 4 C L O G 9 •'n O � r P d N C O 9 4 r � n s c `oL - Ye �o � - To •. rr ec it u -mac $L4 _ si c aec }, Ne ?�• c•w -r: ev+ °... '�aa Yr N•d• .d•c r P ° L Q L O -J � � C P } O •4+ � O. 9 0. O' 9 'C O � G � + "n 'y — ` ++ TC O tl C .n O C d V L C � c y L y •ti• Y V L Y' �' <O qOY C NVbN� 6S OGEE -L V.mGV <OV VO P9 O O 4 Y� I a u b c O `st g u n v � r l 3 lt) al U m i � V m L O Y G W L a � ° O > C c c Y � r � C e �y CC =?� TiL.rni Vi � i 4V V n s N 4qt �( O C d �V tiq>V 9 N O u C •Cn V V G� N ° v A Y1 J V - O i C r C_ 6 j14 Gi°Z E '• W ` C C O S V_ Q V lV-J V d C� F 'e q i t r C fir r Y rr u — TV— C Ur Ctr q q G r c $ .L. �. L_qq✓ q a q�VC `O O P C 7Z N r C'S! yr c� V tr a•e — 9 L 9 V q � a C dq— 2• ° F - �Aa �'u V q� A'1 V .n L✓ t aT r V A ` •O A L V O (♦ � C q � L_� C i 7 i G V f.+ 6V Wes. Wr NdY L V 26 O VO O Ll ^ ■ Y _ i V P N ^.T O ty t_r V Y i t 6wV q < \_�.'{ y. Y \x•117 ri I N� I 0 e L u � O O � j V r N N N N L — V • _ P • V O V L a L z o Y u N V sE `z 2"' c 6 + d L Z C p T + PVT Or l . cigo Y L` Nnw T ,N VLi+ Oi' —r yY iY `c Y O t t G y O V q 6u O ✓ O 6 q > C V V N O L 4 7 6 o�N uL_ _ 7 u q T C v ,p V� i � L O Y G W L a � ° O > C c c Y � r � C e �y CC =?� TiL.rni Vi � Cy 4V k ° v A Y1 J C_ 6 j14 Gi°Z E '• C F 'e Y rr u — `a m r G r c $ .L. �. L_qq✓ q a q�VC `O P C r 0 e L u � O O � j V r N N N N L — V • _ P • V O V L a L z o Y u N V sE `z 2"' c 6 + d L Z C p T + PVT Or l . cigo Y L` Nnw T ,N VLi+ Oi' —r yY iY `c Y O t t G y O V q 6u O ✓ O 6 q > C V V N O L 4 7 6 o�N uL_ _ 7 u q T C v ,p V� .N..�O✓ � L O GW_ L . > Y � C e �y CC =?� TiL.rni Vi � LAw 4V Gi°Z F 'e `a .L. �. L_qq✓ q .� q�VC �— P C yr c� tr a•e q � a dq— 2• ° F - �Aa �'u O (♦ � C q � L_� C i 7 i G V O ^ ■ Y _ i V P N t_r V Y i t 6wV N6W 4— < y. Y MO�� ri N� M Yi 0' P 3g �' 11 h a I v qy i u`'r V v I T C L 1 d V r u Y`V 6 v O y� •� {I r L V O N O N y pt. V V G 9 d P ° L L d— .CiG C V O C- i q P d acv G i d N V d 1 a n I � I h i u`'r V v I T C Or pr V r u Y`V 6 O 1 a V r C �' r9 '� •� � 0 7 V•` _ `• P V C ° 6 y t t C ` N T � C V d aONe r`p` WN LG V` O— V P t <I Oq W V P N V ` 9 6 <OV G I r6 OOa O> �~ yE G•V a r._.r G�� b ` Oy S G L q G d> C W Pv L = u y J 9 N m q = ru7ir V 0 1' ` O— V 6 Gr VOq G V rV M- NNy —^_• —� V V w9 —_Y tj d � V Y r G t C y i N 11 11 Cl CITY" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 28, 1984 TO: Chai..,a-i and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: REVISION - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -27 - BARMAKIAN - A revision to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit to allow the development of a caretaker's residence in conjunction with a mini - warehouse facility on 11.03 acres of land in the General Industrial category (Subarea 1), located on the west side of Vineyard, between Arrow and 9zh Street - APN 207 -262- 44. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Development of a caretakers residence B. Purpose: Provide 24 hour security C. Location: West side of Vineyard between Arrcw and 9th Street D. Parcel Size: 11.03 acres (480,467 square feet) E. Existing Zoning: Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 1) F. Existing Land Use: Lemon grove G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Condominiums; Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) South - Industrial; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 1) East - Industrial; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 2) West - Cucamonga Creek; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 1) H. General Pldn Designations: Project Site - General Industrial Nort'. - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) South - General Industrial East - General Industrial /Rail Served West - General Industrial ITEM B ?LAN41NG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -27 - Barmakian !- ovember 28, 1984 Page 2 E I. Site Characteristics: Project site slopes to the southwest at approximately a 2 grade. The site consists of an existing lemon grove with a eucalyptus windrow along the south side of Arrow. J- APR7icable P,eoulations- The Industrial Specific Plan permits a caretaker's residence in conjunction with a mini- warehouse storage facility within a General Industrial District subject to a Conditional Use Permit. II. ANALYSIS: A. Back round: On September 25, 1384, the Planning Commission conditions ly approved Conditional Use Permit CUP 84 -27 for the total development of five (5) multi - tenant industrial buildings, mini- warehouse facility, and a gas station at the subject site location. The applicant intended to propose the use of a caretaker's residence in conjunction with the mini - warehouse storage facility, but failed to include this request as a part of the Previous proposa?; taus, the subject CUP revision reflects the applicants initial intention. B. General: The applicant proposes to increase the size 0 an approved building (originally intended to be a caretakers unit, see attached plan) from 20' by 30' to 33' by 40' to be utilized as a caretakers residence. The proposed request meets the mininILM / maximum standards of the Development Code. The caretaker unit and surrounding area should provide for additional architectural and landscaping treatment due to the nature of the proposed use and its public exposure. C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the app scant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the establishment of the proposed caretaker use. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and General Plzn. In addition, the proposed site and building designs, together with the recommended c-�„�itiors, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or' we fare. u �r� E LI PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -27 - 8armakian November 28, 1984 Page 3 IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper. The property was posted and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -27 through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. Respectfully submitted. City Planner RG:DP:cv Attachments: 'xhibit ",;' - Location Map Exhibit; "8" - Site Utilization Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations Resolution LI s: 4 U E NORTH CITY OF IrB1: U J7E! 0,� z 0 RANCHO CUCA1'IO\GA -nTu: L. o c A. Tl oA m isrP PLANNI\G DINTSON EXHIMT: w Sc:Au- .L3-/7' E I] • t Ir ' l �--� J (g -14 � el: °~lw� Tr /I7F'f- 2 ARROW STREET) C7eu era - 2 � w Oi F Z•�YVL I< C"- 2M .z.la ARROW TT�'7`TTo %J J v! 'w•c J t iz (yIJA t' — UU %Q Served 1 l 1! \ 5�,ba►ea Z i `.J 741" *P . NORTH CITY OF 1TE \1 -- wP OWZ7 RANCHO CUCA1TMONGA rrrL J:: �1i� ��'+7 Ldp Ai PLAMI \G Dl'krlSnN EXHIBIT: 13 _ SCAU -- s S • _. .� ,. .. ,. .. . - .. � '_ � � _ ,: i � ,.. _ 1 ! Yr' t. 11 Ll 0 RESOLUTION NO. : RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -27 FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CARETAKER RESIDENCE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD BETWEEN ARROW AND NINTH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 1) DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of October, 1984, a complete application was filed by Pfister for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of November, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancit% Cucamonga Planning Commission resoled as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use Plan, the objectives the purposes of the located. is in accord with the General of the Development Code, and district in which the site is 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not he detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or mdteriall injurious to properties or improv`ments in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on November 28, 1984. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -27 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to prior approval of the architectural and landscape plans by the Design Review Committee. 2. Floor plans of the building shall be submitted to the Fire District for review prior to occupancy. ,f�- b 3. The applicant shall c.ntact the Building and Safety Division and Engineering Division regarding the submittal of appropriate plans and obtaining necessary permits prior to operation of use. 4. All of the above Conditions of Approval shall be completed prior to occupancy. S. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if appr,ved use has not commenced within twelve (12) months from the dace of approval, per Conditions of Approval. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Vice- Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I. Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commissior, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly - ntroduced, passed, and adop °ed by tha Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of November, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: —7 2 11 E CITY OT' RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 28, 1984 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: John Meyer, Assistant. Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -36 - HUTCHINSON - Development of a second dwelling unit within a garage on 14,000 square feet of land in the Low Medium Residential District located at 6897 Amethyst APN 202- 121 -01. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Reauested: Approval of Conditional Use Permit B. Purpose: Second dwelling unit C. Location: 6897 Amethyst D. Parcel Size: 14,000 square feet E. Existing Zoning: Low Medium Residential F. Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin North - Vacant Low Medium -8 du /ac) South - Vacant Low Medium (4 -8 du /ac) East - Mobile Home Park (Low Medium du /ac) West - Vacant Lout 12 -4 du /ac) H. General Plan i ro jj emote North - Low South - Low East - Low West - Low 3esignations: - Low Medium Residentia' (4 -8 du /ac) Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Medium (4 -8 du /ac) (2 -4 du /ac) I. Site Characteristics: The subject property is a rectangular shaped lot with an 80' frontage and 175' depth. J. Applicable Regulations: Second dwelling units are permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit and the following criteria. ITEM C November 28, 1984 Page 2 1. The unit may be constructed as an accessory building or attached to the primary residence on a parcel in a single family residential district. 2. Tha unit is not for sale, bu�: for rental purposes only or use by a member of the immediate family. 3. The lot contains an existing single family detached residence, and does not contain a guest house. 4. The unit does not exceed 540 square feet. 5. The unit shall have a separate entrance from the main entrance. 6. The unit shall provide parking and access per Chapter 17.12, except temporary removable units shall provide one off - street parking space. 7. The unit construction shall conform to the site development criteria applicable to accessory buildings or additions to main residence in the base district in which the unit is located. 8. The use of temporary /removable structures for a second dwelling unit shall be linited to the sole occupancy of one or two adult persons who are 60 yuears of age Or over and related to the occupants of primary residence by blood, mcrriage, or adoption. Further, said structure shall be restricted to tho area at the rear of the primary residence and adequately screened from public Yiew from the street. 9. The unit may re;uire Design Review, ,pursuant to Section 17.06.010 -E, as determined by the City Planner. 10. The applicant shall submit to the Building and Safety Division written certification from the affected water and sew. district that adequate water and sewer facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed unit. For units usil,, septic facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Quality Controi Board and the City, written certification of acceptability including all supporting information shall be submitted. � -2 E v PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -36 - Hutchinson November 28, 1934 Page 3 II. ANALYSIS A. General: The applicant is proposing the construction 'R -a second dwelling unit to the rear of his property. The unit wou'd consist of 637 square feet of livino_ area and 2043 square feet of garage area. The unit is designed to accomodate guests and to provide Mr. Hutchinson with additional work and storage area. The proposed second dwelling unit meets the requirements of a Conditional Use Permit. 8. Environmental Assessment: The proposed project has been determined to be a categorical exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1) in which it is not an addition and will not have a significant affect on the environment and which shall, therefore, be exempt from the provisions of CLQA. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed project is consistent with the Development Code and General Pion. The prcposed use, together with the recommended conditions of approval, will not be detrimental to the public heal`h or :materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no corresponde. has been received either for or against this project. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 84 -36 thrcugh adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions. spect by submitted, Ri k z City Planner RG:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Existing Land Use Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Resolution C -3 1 166, YptcmT' CL-) 1 C " Cl v SUZZECT to PROPERTY 66 W VACANT t Lij (tN. N s Fbc 2 v 73' o CITE' OF RANCHO C,'C -kNIO GA PL.A:INI \G DIVEIGN C � NORTH TCL�1= CUP 84 TITLE= & E \i'iiMT ---A _SCALE- e E WE: taanl I � 1 J —'___• irs __ i CLK. 7s'Gi..., - ^_. _.___ —• �T —�� ^ RL 4f1 R i 04RAC lcaR�iL •( \ I 4�E:L SYLF9 � .L' � � f� -ALL 4 1 VMPafAR. �A {1kL.6YPAt R.nKNai i- \ 1. 1 i NJU'aG i CI fY OF RANCHO CUCNNMONGA PLcNTNUING DINISM 0 1 � a ii 1IC ai 3 M[ i ✓ V NORTH rmxl: CUP EA-fig 7iTI.E= _- si T PL [ E?,H1Brr - SCALE- 0 -S i i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -36 FOR A SECOND DWELLING UNIT LOCATED 6897 AMETHYST IN 1HE LOW MEDIUM DISTRICT WHEREAS, on V 29th day of October, 1984, a complete application was I iled by Mr. Doug Hutc:_inson for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of Nnvember, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: �. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Pim , the objectives of the Development Code, and the purpc.es of the district in which the site is located, 2. That the proposes use, tog- }her with the cor•itIons applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the pub is hezlth, safety, or welfare, or materially irj,3rious to properties or improvementr- in the °irinity. 3. 'list the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -36 has been determined to h� a categorical exwrptior under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -36 is hereby approved. APPROVE? AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION CF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Vice Chairman ATTEST: Rink Gomez, Deputy Secretary C ' C� Resolution No. Page 2 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission cf the City of R;;ncho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cormnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of November, 1984, by the follow ;na vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIGNERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E 0 CITY 0:- RA1NCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT U DATE: November 14, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Plann-:no Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -21 - ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH - A request to convert an existing 1,868 square foot single family residerce into an office for the Alta Loma Christian Church on ?a' acres of land in the Very Low Residential District, lccated at the west side of Sapphire Street, across from Oranqe Street - APN 1062- 332 -23. L I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Convert single family residence into a church office. B. Purpose: Provide administrative office facilities for Alta Loma Christi- Church. C. Location: 6390 Sapphire D. Parcel Size: .25 acres (1O,S90 sq. ft.) E. Existing Zoning: Very Low Residential F. Existing Land Use: Single Family Residential G. Surroundin Land Use and Zoning: orth - r,stitutio 1 church Very Low Residential South - Single Family Residential, Low Residential East - Single Family Residential, Low Residential West - Institutional (church), Very Low Residential H. General Plan r-je3� ct Sate North - Low South - Low East - Low West - Low )esignations: Low Residential Residential (2 -4 Residential (2 -4 Residential (2 -4 Residential (2 -4 (2 -4 du /ac) du /ac) du /ac) du /ac) du /ac) ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 34 -21 - Alta Loma Christian Church November 14, 1984 Pag3 2 11 I. S.,e Characteristics: The subject property is a rectangular shaped lot. ini> property is basically surrounded by the adjacent church property. J. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code permits church office facilities within the Very Low Residential district subject to a Conditional Use Permit. In eddition, no structure originally designed as a residence shall be used for an office use unless the b::ilding and site are improved to meet all code requirements for an office development. II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: On October 10, 1984, the Planning Coma ;ss;en continued Conditional Use Permit 84 -21 to give the applicant ample time to revise plans indicating the relationship between the proposed use and the Master Plan of the Alta Loma Christian Church_ On November 14, 1984 a Master Plan of the Alta Loma Christian Church, incorporating the conversion of the subject single family residence into a church office, was presented to the Commission_ The Planning Commission continued Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -21 and instructed staff to draft a resolution for approval consideration.. S. General: The attached resolution reflects the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -21 with conditions of approval. These conditions address the following: 1. Conditional Use Permit Time Limit Hou.•s of Operation Restrictions :s. Signage Requirements 4. Occupancy Limitation 5. Landscaping 6. Use Limitations 7. Lighting Impacts 8. Building Code Requirements 9. Grading Requirements C. Environmental Assesment: The proposed project has been determined to be categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 15301, Class 1) in which the conversion of a single family to an office use will not have a significant environmental impact. r.. L .; PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF R PORT CUF 84 -21 - Alta Lama Chrir':ian Church November 14, 1984 Page 3 I;::. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon previous Planning Commission direction, it is rec mmended that the Commission review the attached resolution to determi.._ the project consistency with the General Plan. Should the Commission support the findings and zonditions of apyroval, adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. A pect`', submitted, 2 City Planner RG:DP:ns Attachments: LF.tter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Master Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations Resolution 11 W] � -3 David A. Drye 6361 Sapphire Street Alta Loma, CA 91701 October 10, 1984 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear. Sir: This letter is in response to the proposed Conditional Use Permit 84 -21 - ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH. Since the last permit issuance to this body there has been a marked increasa in traffic on Sapphire Street, and .several near -miss accidents at the entrance to the Church Day School. This is easily observable from our location directly across the street. Operation of offices, in addition to any that already have been provided for in prior permits, at tha proposed site car. only add to congestion at that intersection of Orange and Sapphire. Inasmuch as the traffic engineers are reluctant to further reduce the 40 M.P.H. speed limit through this area, it is felt that the additional use and physical lack of visibility from the noi-;h side of the approach on Sapgliire, constitutes an unacceptable level of risk for personal injury and death. Other adverse consideration include the urauthoriz(-� sleeping and feeding of youngsters, the lack of proper walkpath and area separation plans for free access to other church facilities. Clearly, there does not appear to be any precedent for such of Rancho C:uc;amenga it-se11. Lastly, the lack or preparation and planning foresight in this latest conditional use permit application reflect more clearly then ever before the deficiency of the church to define it goals, methods, and actions. Should it become necessary to relocate my personal residence, I shall not overlook the oppo °tunity to solicit the Al;.a Loma C.C. as a purchaser, if this permit is approve:?. „ r� Y�s 1. i�'7 E E E C � , _rT : � i t U crs �� -; ..''�� +� • -.. ,— —• a *;A — ,' _��•� — LO ui s r 7 iii < uj j4 € ;�= ;F� 3 °, aS S 1 J L 4 m Y t ^ Y JY V L e 1 Z ui W z 0 0 Z W LA C - � Q W i �Jatp j W - � �1 _ yy6 9f m(a` 00 ZS b zr- IU V W± G • W Y W GJJ D J J ice) a ! ' EE J O ~ J7 r Z n - iJ -fo RMP % . TYPICAL l �.• Lx_, t (i�l( 'i1�(' Tttt�'iyo� ��rR`I'1 Y��1 y"W"�fi. ( t""'TMa"r•..•y,ti..r,�.�y _ � . ..'1\ (,({ ,�11� II7 %� I(,V'+ I�(t'III�III �iI I N(" IIM •'� �.IIcW �'� '� r .1^�� t IJ; =�:� ii�e.'i r .. r , I � ll•IN {.J ' Irll. - (� /nt.f•. q}w7:Jllu�.� i1,0� Y ..T ' `` , — S i .1 ��14 Ii•. _. I }t ( f �h� ^- I r ' { I t ! � ' i � ., ��'I �,I. are i { r ,' -•)5. I �• LAST �EXISTINfi TBXTUnMp ST(:CaO 7YPICAL/ F_ %(SIN& TEXTURED WOpp - -umN6; APPLY . HBAr•! 15001 'r, ST-4-j COLOR TO Wt4TCr, Mt1LTIPURpOSC /pR =5CWOOL 6,C;r TYPICAL . -. •r.� \�� �rrW+Lg14W.J J... -• JV, 'lit' .i' -1i= "_, -r 8t 4 .. �� �(e is I - u. I ��'� ; •1`- �. SOUTH t'XISTING WOOD SIDING; /' EXISTING WOOD PASC.IA' I STAIN AS A_o, �� STAIN AS ACOVE TYPICAL/ NEW •9TOREPRONT• et,- '7(;p•NOC L . _.iIIWT • - NEW' t < 4 SOL'C+H FIR TRIM w MAIM- . MULTI PUR-Otl5 /1°RCSCNOOL . ._ UTAN A9 A ove• 7YI�ICAL— - - CXTEI�IOIZ _ELEVATION S cli-r i or, ITL ( :p e"14 - L I RANCHO CUCAiL'IO.rGA TITLE-. aLEVlaT:0 PLANNING DIx%ZS o N F-XHIBIT: ,(C a SCALE: Tn c nsu 7>- Ll RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONCA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -21 FOR THE CONVERSION OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE INTO A CHURCH OFFICE LOCATED AT 6390 SAPPHIRE STREET IN THE VERY LOW DISTRICT WHEREAS, o,i the 7th day of August, 1984, a complete application was filed by Alta Loma Christian Church for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of November, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearina to consider the above- described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Co=issior. resolved as SECTION 1: Tta- the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the Genera .i Plan, the objectives of tn_ oevelopment Code, ano the purposes of the district in which the site ir- located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will oe detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Lode. iETION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the en�,:r')nment and is categorically exempt from the provisions of the Califorr. a Environmental Quality Act. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -21 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval is limited for a period of twenty -four (24) months and shall expire November 28, 1986, unless extended by 0e Planning Commission 2. A small sign :;hall be posted at the adjacent parking lot area on private, not public property, directing and indicating parking for the office use, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Resoluticn No. Page 2 3. All high intensity security light illumination from the Alta Loma i.hristian Church property shall be shielded from the surrounding properties. 4- A landscape planter shall be provided across the driveway area continuing the proposed streetscape scheme to the north, in order to detour vehicular use, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5. The kitchen facilities shall be limited to the employees of the office. 6. Occupancy of the building shall be limited to not more than 20 persons. 7. The applicant shall submit the necessary information to the Building and Safety Divsiion in order to comply to building code requirements and obtain the appropriate permits for an occupancy change prior to operation of the office use. 8. Floor plans of the building shall be submitted to the Fire District for review prior to occupancy. 9. All conditions of approval shall L-2 completed prior to Ask occupancy of the office. 10. Approval shall expire, m::ss extended by the Planning Commis on, :f approved use ,gas not cr:mmenced within twelve (12) months from the date of approval, per Conditions of Approval. 11. This apiroval shall run, with the applicant and shall become void upon a change of ownership ,r if the business operation ceases. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th nAY OF NOVEMBER, 19&.1. PLANNING COMRFSSIGN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- E. David Barker, Vice Chairman ANEST- Rick Gomez, Deputy Secre— Lary E. Resolution No. Page 3 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City if Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of November, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E F- Fy_ IL 2 11 V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 28, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Pick Gomez, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -48 - tN" - The development of an square foot office /warehouse multi- tenant industrial park on 5.75 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 11), generally located at the northeast corner of 6th Street and Utica Avenue - APN -209- 411 -17. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site plan and architectural design, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Construction of a 80,000 square foot multi- tenant industrial park. C. Location: Northeast corner of 6th Street and Utica Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 5.75 acres. E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial (Subarea 11). F. Existing Land Use: Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use and 'Zoning: North - Vacant, industrial buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 11). South - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 11)). East - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 11). West - Coca Cola plant, vacant; Industriai Park (Subarea 6). H. General Plan Designations: roJ� 'ect Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - Industrial Park ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EA & OR 84 -48 - Pacific Scene November 28, 1984 Page 3 E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant_ Staff has comp let4d the Environmental Checklist (Part II) and Yids found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS- This project is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Pan and the General Pian. The proposed use, building design and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, is in compliance with all applicable City standards. In addition, the project: will n -t be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for Environmental Review in The Daily Report Newspaper. V. RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 84 -48 by adapting the attached Resolution with Conditions. Re�Mct�yIly,gbb tted, ck toml�z- ty Planner NF:ns Exhibit "A" - Location Map & Industrial Specific Plan Exhibit "8" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan and Plaza Plan Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations (5 sheets) Initial Study - Part II Resolution of Approval with Conditions rnd i- th e ed )r Im d 9 11 E Ll C E. 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 28, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMEENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -48 - E E N - he deve opment of an 80,000 square foot office /warehouse multi- tenant industrial park an 5.75 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea !I), generally located at the northeast corner of 6th Street and Utica Avenue - APN -209- 411 -17. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site plan and architectural design, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Construction of a 80,000 square foot multi- tenant industrial park. C. Location: Northeast corner of 6th Street and Utica Avenue. D. Parcel Size.* 5.75 acres. E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial (Subarea 11). F. Existinq Land Use: Vacant. G. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, industrial buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 11). South - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 11). East - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 11). West - Coca Cola plant, vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea a). N. General Plan Desi nations: roject Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - Industrial Park ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EA & DR 84 -48 - Pacific Scene November 28, 1984 gage 2 I. Site Characteristics: The property is currently vacant and slopes in a southwesterly direction at approximately 2%. Vegetation is limited 'to indigenous weeds and Grass. II. ANALYSIS: P., General: The proposed ievielopment is designed as a multi - tenant industrial complex which consisted of 4 buildings with loading access in the rear. The exterior materials include the use of tilt -up cu:crete panels with painted texturized treatment, bronze tinted glass and bronze ainodized aluminum for windows and trim. Access to the project shall be provided from 6th Street and Utica Avenue. B. _Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed ,he project and recommended several design and landscaping changes. These changes include: - Enhancing the appearance and function of the plaza facing Building No. 2 by increasing the plaza area and providing a strong pedestrian entrance statement; - Providing landscaping along northeast si:= of Building No. 4 by recessing the loading access, in order to improve building relationship and pedestrian connections; and - Providing a stronger architectural statement at the building corner facing 6th Street and Utica. The developer has incorporated the above-mentioned requirements as shown on Exhibit "B" and "E". C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project and has initial concerns regarding the driveway access at 6th Street and Utica Avenue. Since new policies are being developed regarding driveway access for ne,, developments, the Technical Review Committee has recommended that the driveway access for this project shall be developed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Therefore, the Technical Review Committee has determined that with the recommended conditions of approval, the project is consistent with applicable standards and ordinances. D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee has reviewed the project, and with the recommended conditions of approval, has conceptually approved the grading plan. .- E 0 L' J G PLAN14ING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EA & DR 84 -48 - Pacific Scene November 28, 1984 Page 3 E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist (Part II) and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a rEsult of this pz,oject. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial Are pecific Plan and the General Plan. The proposed use, building design and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, is in compliance with all applicable City standards. In addition, the project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for Environmental Review in The Daily Report Newspaper. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Deve opment Review 84 -48 by adopting the attached Resolution with Conditions. Respjctf ily:liibmitted, ri Rick om� Gity canner fG:NF:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map & 1ndu' trial Specific Plan Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan and Plaza Plan Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations (5 sheets) Initial Study - Part II Resolution of Approval with Conditions 4 3 C1 \ I I ! ! ! I SWQ V. !� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAINIO \TEA PLANNING DIVISIOV �-r, 1 V NORM ITEM: TITLE: - j• "���/ � ��� �/i� ExtilBIT-- _ 7�Ci W1T4 wo.iu 200AMv. -- Dow" iis.e NNo Dom =10 OmwM 3, FdK"Wiomw am CITY OF RANCHO CUCAINIO \TEA PLANNING DIVISIOV �-r, 1 V NORM ITEM: TITLE: - j• "���/ � ��� �/i� ExtilBIT-- � �..PJ �•1L.J.A./• ,_ IV CITY Or RANCHO CUCA,,N /10. 'GA PUNNING DfVts ov I MW s.... .fYu `i�• fI! i� 1 � �J > iv 2�• I PLAZA PLAN V NORTH 11 11 1] I _ _ III. I p STREET 2 .. -- 7 .. _ —� ...-. a... ...� •�..• r... . CITY 0, RANCI -I0 CL'CAi-vio \NGA PLANNING DIVOON c ✓A V `'ORTH f iF oI i :s 'e i I, C- F 1 1 .e V) L•] F r, V 6 U' O O U Z C' I 0 E 0 i` �i • III f E_cj s NO �aF m i z U > G 0 CU`z n � fit" v- -,%Q a �.�•l .. a� 0 1 U CIO r U> 0 O� Q A 0 El CITY OF RAN(M0 CUCP.MONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY MIROhKt AL CHECKLIST DATE: .APPLICANT: FILING DATE: PROJECT: & AM;-re - -re :A A PROJECT LOCATION: I. ENMIRON.LMNTAL I1-LPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). 1. Soils and Geoloty. Will the proposal have significant results ir.: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or Physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property tc geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? 2. Hydroloty. Will the proposal have significant results in: E-// YES MAYBE NO ►A i V klo/ a- Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers,.or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runcff? c- Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e- Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f- Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g- Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference wi *_h the attainment of applicable air quality standards? C. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or te=perature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? Page 2 YES MAYBE NO b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? 40 _ _ El El u Page 3 YES MAYBE NO c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of ` plants into an area?Y / d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of ani =als? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare / or endangered species of animals? E/ c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of ani -nls into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _ d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or �r J 0 / wildlife habitat? 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human popu? -ation of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or / create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional sccio- ec .)nomic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property 'values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers. tax payers or project users? 1/ 7. Land Use and Planninz Ccnsideratiors. 11ill the proposal have significant results in? a. A subsrantial alteration of the present or land ✓ ✓✓ planned use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing cons=ptive or non- cons•.m:ptive Ve recreational opportunities? a, 8- Transportation, Will the results in: Proposal have significant a- Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b• Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? �- Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new p rking? d- Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e• Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f• Alterations to or effects on present and Potential water - borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? g- Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9• Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have sign- -'icant results in: a- A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. Health. Safety and Nuisance Factors. Will the Proposal have significant results in: a- Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b- Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c- A risk of explosion or release of %azardous substances in the event of an accident? d- An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e- Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to petentiall noise levels': y dangerous g• The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? Page 4 YES N.AYBS 230 d V t 9C 11 -1C _Val/ Page 5 YES MAYBE 230 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b. c. d. ® f. 7I 9- h. Natural or packaged gas? Communications systems? Water supply? Wastewater facilities? Flood control structures? Solid waste facilities'. Fire protection? I. Police protection? j. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of Public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental ser-rices? 13. ErerRV and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? _- b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An Increase or perpetuation of the consumpt'on of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? V �i e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14, j`andatory Findings of Siznificance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b- Does the project have the potertial to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future), c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed ir. connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). d- Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Page 6 YES MAYBE No VZ M V/ _tz II. DISCUSSI?z of ENVIRp yT� EVALUATIO, ite above questions plus a discussicn of (i.e., of affirmative answers to proposed mitigation measures). TW Mzwcjr aM&- *A jE- E oaC�s WWr' 1AA5W.0 AfFYC.AWT sIMGFE 'SLIWLW sT,rs�ov.D�� '720 AOOP40 E A� 11 D III. DETEMMINATION On /the basis of this initial evaluation: I---� I find the proposed project COULD 140T have a significant effect ily /14 on the enviro=ent, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. _ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant ! effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect t� in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the envirnnent, and an ENVIRONMNT IMPACT REPORT is required. Late 1'1 /ism C U Page 7 619 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -48 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND UTICA AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 15th day of October, 1984, a complete application war Pacific Scene, Inc. for review of the above - described project; any WHEREAS, on the 28th day of November, 1984, the Rancho Cu,::imonga Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described r.oject. Planning Commission That the following can That the proposed T ject is objectives of the Genera! Plan; That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and the proposed use is in compliance with each of applicable provisions of the Development Code; That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety. or welfare, or materially i.:jurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Geclaration is issued on November 28, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -48 is approved subject to following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION Berming of up to 3 feet high with a maximum 3 1/2 to 1 against the parking areas required along 6th Street and Utica Avenue. All roof mounted equipment, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets. Resolution No. Page 2 3. A uniform sign program for this development shall be required and shall require a separate application to be aproved by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 4. Trash enclosures shall be designed per City standards. ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. Driveway approaches on 6th Street and at north end of property on Utica Avenue shall be constructed per City standards and totally on subject property. Joint use easements shall be provided for adjacent Properties prior to occupancy and /or lease. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGGA BY: E. David Barker, Vice Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission, held on the 14th day of November, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: C i9 0 E y l) Q i d 2 �yO °Ty�LN .N p Vput V ^UyG 4 � L•]CL C'L q� o uvyi ^�, r eN oiyfq ^ CL qL � q Oyu M y p 6 V N CC 9 u gP V N y T VCO n c� Vie« L L B r^ L L V M p c'gNyon..l V O «L tiV Nu - 6 + V 9 6C i u°i t q y H S C i O r V O iE O n Cl Q O v N L V U � H L � 6 p N t NZ l— C T O u o pc -n V +N� W w° 69du q N C Y - c 6 V YL. O T L = b ^ v y O 9 d T r yCNOL. A _O C V N n g�< v acS�gn P _ L VCPV•O• C c d a L C > ^ V�p Ny yr 'ev G N — u —•r V N^ d y O � OOC w yl ^� NI b q 6 L Ci y n L N p V O g V Vp P C y^ r v� o° 2OW Nr,C d y O _ d Np Pte' C < d O C A L p M g« q�L PN�x- q C L' y �VCV 1 Y OL V.i 4NNCL — V y N <�r C C O 0 9 .T V y d y r L ' y y O q =yy d qvy _ u+ 9 N V ^9 e p 9 Z l V d � OL• t 9 O y V q NO^ d °V p9 L C C + O b V E O p1 d p q C N C d 6 6+ S 0 9 m = P t V d o N Aw T ` L O C N Gym V a p E p L q V L d C d L Lys C _ N L W � 6 scy�a °r uli Cw°. V qO a V g d d d C Tdu N c O � O <p ayi °<Et� d q • C C O N N C L L p t p V Vf vP .0 c o c m .o9 u 2 6 � O ✓ q y � C N � M w « r q • L d .0. .. L rC.d.y O q 9 N V O C = c -�v � C L J ^ q N CC �L C !c N d q d d bI ti � d C C I •! _ M 1 O N< s p V N +t L i�gEsNEu G`- Z ?zvsu b4YNU� o V C V 9r� p N V °V Z ELO L L •..N �`N TOy b q C y p L� G 60p P CN•�L�gOCV< J 0V0 V C L ° N d<� r p 9 9 d O �� Y• pp Y �L y �V. OCV�rH�V v Y O V O R q q M C C > n .L �LO .��LL• der . OL F fi pyO LN9L.q 00 C N.^L y 9 � � � q VrEyN4I�V =y O O u 0 i °N C V LO, APp wr TyAC C pq7 P � <9OVVa s 'Y .^aN p� C V J q d Y P 2 ol q V �•• <ai O < s �9 6�Z «�ML.O.� L- Z 2 O vP .0 c o c m .o9 u 2 6 � O ✓ q y � C N � M w « r q • L d .0. .. L rC.d.y O q 9 N V O C = c -�v � C L J ^ q N CC �L C !c N d q d d bI ti E N C 1 CF w i 4 •'i. l Y O v� � �Vi b 6 l °< � q d p� G D V v V� e k� —L .i, mar o� l .e -nn4° $C9 LcT a —r 4w•N— °V.�i —C.0 rCN �Ni°o r N S .L..S r ... p c .J C� a .�i 0 .°• .' ^ `_ �' s J 6 o? n y V� �— c J OnOY ♦d Cql O'J .�YN yw.°. Lr .1n.n GV NJ 4 ycV CT i cola waO >L' d ye.c VLE d— w y L J = u dNaO gYa.0 �rL L cOC G6rn L P .� 4 w •r L 9 J w• r S 6p V G q c4 J�'L Y Lu La2�CC'n sC �Q1J� '—' .Ge O 4 q a • c G V`- ^ A wY yV 5 ° w C 0 J rM ^ O 4 2 4 T N 6 a ? w ° POSY y ^ =rr r � dNq ac = —N 4L9 ^rte OaO Twr r�C Neu NCL•�wgN q .j Y V r Car iJ O Lta q CO(O C•O LO4' � T L° C L V n PO O 0� V y r N` w °= C V W wL• C L: yri t •• r U C r w y 4 N N= .J .0 O t . = q Y69 O y .Li ^ N .• d 6 Cu dr L Cy N__ V _ N4 q Wi Ow.°.'! G ^— O =J O •• V V �• iy w G` .Vi O L O d C 9 P O w __ L C u ✓� 1_ Q N a J w L O C C •e P L O L N 55�> L uO CV,.r`.2 V_00C d� a O� V V r i — C q L O L ✓ C G N _ u9a Y;l y�.�.. 4— ^SJj�'C LC9p ^O ` lgpy^ L LC 06.TC0 °`r' C� 9�jL Va_q 'YL g26.Vir CO �� C C_y Nq�° C� w.NaV�cO 9Y V•L.•> V PNwC.00 q� 'J 4 NC O C aJQ "� ° Yo•- i Ty? a �y er`u� UOG e - { c°y c 7:9 .5 ..Wy. O c_ — b t N J °p n.or Z a- .L.n 'o e�y 3 orgM ° Y Z N C L VO f.Q4 N C O ^ LIWrL ^,rs..•�M °Nj ra -i _ P. `u 2" Je °�•"4.°, Waa Lo,gE r•. v g'e,,, "o NL ^C —.L yO O 4o VL �q pE .�yo �� �dpOV 4S °" 4r M P.Y• °a L,.` «v_r., NOS c� GNG o' .L.. Ty PY Cl Y -iw? e N —C NLq C ..•.yV ° p` ° C� y c N L C_ q V N g El O 4 G 'u U O V � w O L L_ •N OL ^ L�V QO. r0 °a a — 4W _'n 60CV UO�O N_L `COOC CO V J TP d w i r N= O O C r YSV POd9 C. O L r L r W° y q �« G� a�q� C O 9 L L ^ y� wL• N C° q O °P> rVLyN �S yy� Vri 7n .L.r2��N O O N C 9Cyn �°J, y C a r 9 P V« °r >� Ga0 OrL j PC qO N .G`OV ^NW na �r4ip VC_ VNa -= 96 C^ W< LNP °• °V V O.O qOV _ q' n - 72 72 O qM N °G YN >uaiP YOLL qt q V70 `J s r EdE P`y N'a� NO V•J _v NC _LV, N.4c w V r C O C N- •S V O f' C r° g C {: n Y L N .V• � L Q C 4 e �T• LeL O J .• w V` V 9 L Y V O p LP Le a a S C 4 d 4 W u g V C r t� yy$ «O w N a r 0 P O � C <.L• r L� J °ew OC iallo va> V"o'vc 7 CVL �� y7ayA °r 4ae <cL.c qr o~n� V O L o C> M V V 6> C V C °> r C N °9 n �L MO C•°�NL N97 (O� O'SYLCE 4N4L 4M OLO V Cr V L n V Pr r H w • G q r L 9° Q� fa: G k P O E N C d• a l C L' P d P • t O L T t O V jr, V q� G O. =Ay y_r 9C CO c� O V y L b Cy '•� L C> � V Y v q J O �` P P q O C c O N d G O'r VrbrAVL �0�0� �Tr '6V — —•O qa� O_L.sO NH _ioL ..° �L,I�. 'O ae s c�= A '° �cC 'O• o c= V CU�Cq GGN _ —w =G r —C ^ P uq OL.a VO C Ci � � q Y• P G r a T r' L C 9 N a N l J n P C T 9 'L. � y — L a A d d y ^q r GiV �9 q O V_cL L Lrd J V` v V° � L C Q t r r P N d N d i n dCN °09 'VC,e n dgFE Vd'eM V O' uLw Lr r yr�L > C•J n•Y u LN .^PN ._ wZCO A i Lc � —= LOw C `ayVT u00y9C a•L.r L —NOLO aC`OT V N N w JG >�ya r T L n V d t c =L4° cnY v v c LdY cw n'c bpVly q 6_ C M N N N w> O— G NCr .n 'LC N CGq O V 9 n. P P �Ldd �N_ C Y n "` wCUrO cMwc Pr � A p A y wr'y I9 =c NM 6 ~Cl Vn 9gLVV 9Nr Td 9 ^. PT_aClC C T� L HO Oq•JCC C T14 C_�rP i � C— q�C Cam` w N O N N N d q � •• L N C n+ ' ti q V O L P i C q r t.� u .C'VC ^c C•+A yOd v�MN•J ' L —P Nwur Np r ^ CVO r0 `d0'�'L dO_ V d d 9 u--1 gP�.Oi LVrA 6N IN V d 6q� 6 nC V IrOq � Na V✓ N 2 >� J L6 � >-o� u� g d P d 4 d^ C CA . C O. P `{o— �o oa qyq a4 o co o� c— 00. M• C NIY I' q C O. „O.0ON g6gs[ —1] PO. P .00. N — d O• V\ c c q q= � OQx M .i— wew EV OPd ^rNG OA V Aq LS VN ACd C6— `A GT�W qV�N O yN YO KC O q =4 �� ' V C /aOe NrLC n��> �LOtgd NVPL dP C>N >� d�cNi< LgCM dOY+ C. +^ N 9 `r N qt_ n/V�t nq Cw V C�bd ^qlj� nS jP 9 V C � d L N LY d q L W �� 2— dOrpiL YI OV AuN x— cG ... PV...g °Ni =Ind �qr Pe _N` Ny M O S> . V �ja Tw`O yN�N �O]n '�� Ir ¢_C l�q MCI'• V� w`LCVT OgOO n OT .It4 9d J Q= 0 44 d y C d A 0 O C •� y r C q O w V T q A O V O G P O E r 1. d am— r Iq r V O I.L. —.c A — °� ✓o:.. ..: a� ccal°aq °�.>.” wo'O < +�_ Cu�> oo• '^i'° qwy N .VG L .O rw U C_ yw ^V NFL AULV �� � >q pLN V y H N A V q A V qFi, V P =N O` d V TP V 9 O C q Y C C N' 9 q _ C Q ^ •" nr O O L d q A L L — V _ y L {wd > L p Y u U d 4 A V g d � N L III V 6 > w tpN HpN f.0 <O �•ONwq < 6n WVMOO.y N —NbN (N► r V'L"A � C iN0 HNL 01I 44' 4 I ci M c qv P. -yam dr • IIII 02 V- 9v<Oa C.0 �r �^ •0 ^� N `d`_6 Edc FOIO UO d` C 'VY L'i C`.C6 C° „W.r Y, V•.jU O..n dC �` O du G` V✓ V V C P- N O i Ll p O u �I Q�YO iMN�n. N „ c jN - •L. : qAa °' d -• �u o��o' =bb � Pa 2L s c i n J� NAG uwmy ,E' V „dc - Op V N� L° rpN qL ✓ pO YL•�� °f N'�' SJ �O Zvi'/ � �q MPrp J y V y. W V Q n. d O Y. G y �. ` q C � 6 ✓ C c d N yI _o = pc Mm � ^ ✓...V v` _ � �� = C ”` o.qq q q L V T Oy -yL q8y' O N° GV 6P W V�q a�q� W 9 a i q qY r0 r' +qr VI y`vC =p,� =0 N > -�W �� C_ V•R- rV dC~T .- m .O V V• •w C•i y W r �' L C d d 2 V O- - I +' O -V' r � O i V �� C � =�✓d .• '•M nJ O„ 'JP V .- �~6 Oar _✓ = V u •O.r V j 4 �� C q q „� V V N � V v •^ � V J ° y O -- dO IV'iU �vvq O .J M bq7 r•G�p C • ? Gpy •qi pS' y W t L C t0.1 4 q V O W - D.O T q .••. •Li .Oi. N O.aU e. •q.rO N x0 .a0 C� LC V LVp WNO WVV �6 e_ <r m G y .L.. q� C n C d • N f. v� .o V V ��•° C u O- V O C V V- �„ a_.O• .` C 4.•O.a L �fnn �OLa v�V C Vy J r• T q�v ` L `'L 0 =�j YL4 •• p T r V •L.. O V r F W_ q ` O 4'O W0. O „ r O0. � GE C� .Ur OdT '^ V60 V Q O O�OL LL.Ni� �c � � -vJC .„• doc °° ePOT o L o ='iq cg uo0 �= L - GL �Y`.•'. Np �y.°o b a. g °cam T a W Sqg.. N LV OyJ � VV O � C NOy XO NOy L L _ cv •^ Y L- d P �` ` O V_ O_ � r r a V� V v u «O paL `�L° ✓C 2 C r rgi'WC is =aLi Z c+c oq „ l w „✓ V P� ✓L �V .Li. IC O „jL V^J Fwd 9 LaCC ^VV O Vdl O.O� EO Pi Oy Y0. yWW �CruL „p q ✓L y 5 CS 'z 12T i C O V d �O -• 9 y y O l Ol t d O g 0 0 N V �- c d y c �oj V PN C l? L O v �. C b � N r V W � L b q p O- L✓ V N • q C' O .� <O. O V C E U y r VF O C q L O O N 6 I I I ✓ei q.2 L= a V S �LN6 H9q OI E -23 11 t[) 4r bi S O b q C i �� V a _ N V •r NN `� 0 C C q M C q v CJ• •� � L � V � ^ L T N O = d p` ` ^ 6 C C C > P I! y N i d O C y V N y .N•.c ro �e no zL -.- brb E W -9 u Y� r_cv Ve u V l q r V 9 ..• 6 C _ L� � — V V � q y 0 i. ^ �' �• 4 a ^_ -^ ` q q y ro C O 8 f• — rY. •`r .. �NN � c N W L . N "Li„ m �n ` ,PCa P^ �= O� tC � ^C7`• T -O �M �q` f.N C `!'n��? f:0 b- A iq iuE vW � r^ cbbCr Eo• - k 0 P N Z Lq •°.• Pt Cd n r d q � L C •D. 0° q 0 0^ r ✓ L V P L P O •L.. T • d q N L y P O V< r> Np = b C C V L C r L C V. •. C y •� d y y p �. t N . c ° Q L,°� °L �^ a yndic c PNUpvg Ln b N` E � l P b V — 7 d L PV06 q y •.. = n P � L q O 01 ° Y. d „ Va T•. -^1.Cr r PVu pO �_> O1 �r VawQ� Nn r0 p LV �.O.tb Nq_r Via° —` i C 'J =r w •�^ CC J N4q Lyf� L L✓ 4yo6 c Q e✓'... 21 q r Q r Vq � � O� p T� q V ono •.^ d — q q . � � L � L L L V V P N `�. d vj °r •y�•gyv co �a �c f•r N �O.NZ LC N Lv 6C° \°.'o LV Vn °nib a H b C O !0 b e-o n n P C W g n n lT ffL E�� C 0 n S r C V V 7 C e T W E c Loy a.� � a` >. b nc" N —.. ... c„ - a• C d'Laua� ..N. c. .N.. .r. .•.- w'J �D �qlq q�C 6 —C rb Pa ^ Lf >O NO COO wr•lL 9 °N °V aP° S4 °C � °� 'V •>LpN d� L N V r0 p 6 \EW>.0 nOV� VPU PC Pr = °y qq0. '�' LG L OV r •OiVC r�W, 'tea -W -v�o N ^`•erc Nw u eb lVM >J T O NOr.•t•V.. t rq q v.vvvyr < 40 on.. e='i v_mJ L'� °u `o o•e o! ' Pdw a.°�. <`o .°. 0 w gi i t[) •F • d d V a O O T O q � C U i a . Ar CL r � r 6 E q v d W =u c _ EIL o 4� r r L V q O 4 J r L P mo �'• E m LqN r' a apa Op, Cd qL •J' � V Y C p YM� vP NC Wa _N T. uq• OI �� O ° aJ a r J u O r L L 0 v ° r ° �v Y� c E `OLL� a �. d •°..� n ✓L � O — p _v4 i T .Y 4 9qN L C d i nt N 2 V L T q 2 n c iC P2 !Jdc VT ,`p`✓ iT i Q O V T J � r ✓ T� e c ✓ L 9 ° l W y Ic >.V.. ....°. — � s i r c•L ° i �p fro i ✓a�[pm. o cc =� � Lr O � N O N v d a N O 6 r � V E L G L C Y P r L T_ a L ✓ A a O O O l — O l � L — N r �o ar d z✓ c a r o v^ € — yc dT .ad i` 4d p� d `c «% c L a Ls ro `a n P en u o d a N V ✓ O p V V� O O V q Y i ✓` P` Yd C S p y ✓ Y q C p N C N r i O VI Yfl Ipl � V L �I ✓ L p. N i c c vi 9 N S A P O O C y G j r✓ N N l i L P✓ a. °• _ d 4� �ooar r — L ° 6• W A Y. r U M S L Py .•� V L L✓ L t awo' A N V ii w i `cam °Z C vV cc nr P_.A l 0 4. J— q ✓ z n V Z: ry nR ".s:= `i w NO�v N T C .� y .. L P d • P q C q 1! 1� . i V O T ✓PL 4K V Q. o iC` u L, c n• d E n• zqN ` a ° c �- T A O \t l O � SCV LT�L O r v d a N O 6 r � V E L G L C Y P r L T_ a L ✓ A a O O O l — O l � L — N r �o ar d z✓ c a r o v^ € — yc dT .ad i` 4d p� d `c «% c L a Ls ro `a n P en u o d a N V ✓ O p V V� O O V q Y i ✓` P` Yd C S p y ✓ Y q C p N C N r i O VI Yfl Ipl � C ,2� V L ✓ L p. N c c vi 9 N S A P O O C y G j r✓ N N l i L P✓ a. °• _ d 4� �ooar r — L ° 6• W A Y. r U M S L Py .•� V L L✓ L t awo' A N V ii i `cam °Z C vV cc nr P_.A l 0 4. J— q ✓ z n V Z: ry nR ".s:= `i w NO�v N T C .� y .. L P d • P q C q 1! 1� . .• c V O T ✓PL 4K V Q. o iC` u L, c n• d E n• zqN ` a ° c �- T A O \t l O � SCV LT�L O r C °L � ° t 6• q ZC Z N C ,2� El l 0 V L ✓ L p. N c — a V C y G j L •n P✓ °• _ d v i F 4Q— P M S Py .•� r 7 t awo' A N V °Z °o — cc ry nR — `i w NO�v N T El l 0 11 O z aJ U G O L d 1A E Pr G_ P L r V V �vq vm_ eq e m P p C m- 9 Q a y rm a" Y w l O O C ^ mr V P N i F � u O = H ^ n ` q V m� uLO e m q Z M Y l Yo ° E w o i 6 M i �C•9�°r 9 l P em v q � C 9 V Y aN L q M ` r � V q o L p O me L P . 4 z r 7 p — c 'J 9 p V m r- 0 V L C T aW u u L L M4 c =' �4p M F m� L v P Y r O y8 O l L.. v {i n c 0 6 y U m � a c G L t. q V ^ x, VI L Yu L O P _ ^ C O f q q n r p « L ^J ^W � q O G i L L�H am � C O G O C ` mr p�C Ls m� � u L C L 4 q «v «rr uoa - n V q M V q g�N nmy m 7 y 9 S 9 + o 4 .. a r w 8 ti C �o ' V L b i ^ L v � wbi n r q V q L c M e 0 0 v p V ^ V L q m L q ti �f J � LO L arm c m isFon p- L V 6rq ` `� moo« — � 4 G- 3 o- zo.. L O N L L 4 L C a- Gi O _ «n O I V L O 1 m Y r � u ae dJV.p n Q Pr G_ P L r V V �vq vm_ eq e m P p C m- 9 Q a y rm a" Y w l O O C ^ mr V P N i F � u O = H ^ n ` q V m� uLO e m q Z M Y l Yo ° E w o i 6 M i �C•9�°r 9 l P em v q � C 9 V Y aN L q M ` r � V q o L p O me L P . 4 z r 7 p — c 'J 9 p V m r- 0 V L C T aW u u L L M4 c =' �4p M F m� L v P Y r O y8 O l L.. v {i n c 0 6 y U m � a c G L t. q V ^ x, VI L Yu L O P _ ^ C O f q q n r p « L ^J ^W � q O G i L L�H am � C O G O C ` mr p�C Ls m� � u L C L 4 q «v «rr uoa - n V q M V q g�N nmy m 7 y 9 S 9 + o 4 .. a r w 8 ti C �o ' V L b i ^ L v � wbi n r q V q L c M e 0 0 v p V ^ V L q m L q ti �f J � LO L arm c m isFon L V 6rq ` moo« — � I L O N L L «n 0 cc «m ae Gm^ � a f a � Pr G_ P L r V V �vq vm_ eq e m P p C m- 9 Q a y rm a" Y w l O O C ^ mr V P N i F � u O = H ^ n ` q V m� uLO e m q Z M Y l Yo ° E w o i 6 M i �C•9�°r 9 l P em v q � C 9 V Y aN L q M ` r � V q o L p O me L P . 4 z r 7 p — c 'J 9 p V m r- 0 V L C T aW u u L L M4 c =' �4p M F m� L v P Y r O y8 O l L.. v {i n c 0 6 y U m � a c G L t. q V ^ x, VI L Yu L O P _ ^ C O f q q n r p « L ^J ^W � q O G i L L�H am � C O G O C ` mr p�C Ls m� � u L C L 4 q «v «rr uoa - n V q M V q g�N nmy m 7 y 9 S 9 + o 4 .. a r w 8 ti C �o ' V L b i ^ L v � wbi n r q V q L c M e 0 0 v p V ^ V L q m L q ti �f J � LO 0 u ;,ITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 28, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: L ioyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUEJECT: REVIEW OF UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING POLICY At the present time, a condition of approval of all development and subdivisions in the City is that existing overhead utility li esof 12KV or less on the property must be placed underground. The basis for this requirement for subdivisions is Title 16.36.090 of the Municipal Code and for otner approval is policy only. The cost of work of this kind is about $70 per foot for an average size utility line, thus for a project with both electric and phone lines, the cost could be in the range of $1 >0 per foot. This report is for the purpose of reviewing the cost - benefit relationship of this requirement for the various types of development in the City and what if any, changes in policy should be made. ' ANALYSIS One of the major sources of visual blight in any community is the presence of overhead utility lines. For many years, new developments in this and other com!nunities have been undergrounding all new utility services. This has ,wade a significant improvement in the appearance of the City, particularly in residential areas. There is virtually no opposition to the policy of undergrovnding new services by developers. There has, however, been serious concern about the equity in the policy as it applies to Pxisting utilities fronting smaller developments, particularly in industrial areas. This concern is based on tie benefit of the policy and to whom„ the benefit accrues. The benefit appears to be solely aesthetic and, as such, is enjoyed by all residents of the City. Many developers have argued that the current requirement places an inordinate burden on their properties, with no burden on nearby properties which have no fronting utility lines. This inequity is particularly noticeable in the industrial area where such an aesthetic benefit is reduced. ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Review of Utility Undergrounding Policy November 14, 1984 Page 2 E Another way in which the benefit is reduced is where the street is not a major traffic carrier. For this reason, the Public Utilities Commission has established the following criteria for utility- funded undergrounding programs: I. Such undergrounding will avoid or eliminate an unusually heavy concentration of overhead electric facilities; 2. The street right -of -way is axtensiveiy used by the general public and carries a heavy volume of pedestrian or vehicular traffic; or 3. The street right -of -way adjoins or passes through a civic area or public recreation araa or an area of unusual scenic interest to the general public. Where to Underground: Based on the PUG criteria, an undergrounding priority list attached was developed for the City. This list was intended to guide the utility funded program, but provides a basis for general undergrounding policy. If the list were expanded for additional undergrounding work not eligible for the PUC program, the next most desirable categories would be residential collector, secondary arterials and streets. The attached map shows the locations on on- street overhead lines in the City. How to Underground: Realistically, the State nandated, utility funded program in Resolution No. 81 -158 for major streets will not be finished in the foreseeable future. The question becomes how to achieve additional undergrounding equitably with the greatest cost benefit. When doing projects with funds obtained as a portion of all utility user fees, the money is derived from all bill- payers in the City - -a method which seems to be the fairest possible. When the full cost of undergrounding is imposed on only the fronting property, the cost is greatly concentrated and raises the question of whether the berafit vs. cost ratio is reasonable to the property owner. A further issue ' +n this respect is that the PUC rules consider a lenoth less than 600 feet rct cost - effective and use this as a minimum. Also, the Southern California Edison Co. strongly resists undergrounding stretches l,ss than 600 feet. Options: The following options are presented to provide ways of lessening the impact of undergrounding on smaller projects. 1. Retain existing policy of requiring undergrounding for all approvals or subdivisions, with a provision for deposits or lien agreements on frontages less than 600 feet. 2. Require undergrounding or an equivalent fee from large developments only, based on the number of units, building valuation or a similar parameter (ability to absorb cost). 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Review of Utility Undergrounding Policy November 14, 1984 ® Page 3 3. Require a fee, less than cost, for all permits, based on frontage area or similar variable. 4- Define an "Exempt" area, or type of development, which would not benefit from, nor contribute towards, undergrounding. 5. Underground with PUC program or assessment district only, with -no requirement imposed on new development. All options are apparently used it, one California city or another, according to a poll taken by Engineering in 1531. Responses, however, indicate that the nt requireme to underground is used sparingly around the State. In further regard to No. 3, cons iderat'6o� should be given to the cumulat;ve effect of fees in general and whether adding to the existing fee structure is comens> ,rate with the benefit received. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a combination of Options 2 and 5 be used as fo-Tows: Eliminate the requirement for developers to place existing lines underground, except for projects having a frontage of 600 feet or more along a secondary or major arterial. This would limit the requirement t^ iergths sufficient to be ir placed underground and to only t:ae largest mirdiately categories of development. projects. It would apply to all If such a policy is desired by the Planning Commission, staff should be directed to proceed with the appropriate amendments to Titles 12 and 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code for consideration by the City Council. Respectfully submitted_ Attachments G i RESOLUTION NO. 81 -158 I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRIORITIZED LIST OF POTENTIAL PROJECTS FOP. IMPLE!'LENTATION OF AN ACTIVE UNDERCROUNDIiG PROGRAM PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of October, 1981. AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, Schlosser NOES: None ABSENT: None Phillip D. Schlosser, .yayor A?iEST: ' / WHEREAS, under the provisicrs of Public Utilities Commission Rule 20, the Edisun Company makes available each year funds to cities for the purpose of undergrounding overhead utility lines; and, WHEREAS, since incorporation, Rancho Cucamonga has accumulated $293,111 in this account; and, WHEREAS, the Engineering staff has undertaken to acquaint the Council with the existence of these funds, the procedures involved in the development of a project and recommend a priority for projects for implementation u—ie- the program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga, that the following seven potential projects along major arterial streets are adopted in priority order for implementation of an active undergrounding program: 1. Archibald Avenue - Foothill to Base Line Road. 2. Foothill Boulevard - Haven to Ramona. 3. Haven Avenge - Foothill to Arrow. 4. Base Line Road - Carnelian Street to Turner Avenue. 5. Carnelian Street - Base Line to 19th Street. G. Nineteenth Street - Haven Avenue to West City Boundary. BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that the City Council directs staff to implement the following project with currently available funds: 1. Archibald Avenue - Foothill to Base Line Road. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of October, 1981. AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, Schlosser NOES: None ABSENT: None Phillip D. Schlosser, .yayor A?iEST: ' / 7 2 Lli J _ R - O O 2 2 2 N F z N 0 � O U U � 2 !- c n rr � ? sn O W j i¢ 0 �O Z Li lT O Q F LO O j W Tr- r Y� !! t ' -' "a, ' I , ■ I ( - alp -��� ■ 1 W t Iltia ■ � t I� . F7 -i-7 ' �� '- -_ !1 �',.- + +'' - -- - 3Ad Na AtlN 77 7 Aij Is i 1 •!•: i. aC - . 1 = �%f 7� 1y !a -- :;4* - i_'i 1 c t• °I - J '��= +-, 'ii' i, iY''' '' -'i-t r1x-= it'd - - --tr - ',3..• ; � s �_.` t. —.. su;�_ c — „may � ��..t —r: �`I :i 1■ _. t� . �i..��t �h 3ndr ^xa ; -�'y tea, o�renoa{'di� •_s 7_ � ; l --' t _. _l; �t.tl.�� . � - _--' Y. • M_; .�- i tir s. y�-- ■- .:5. - -1� 7, . - �%r1-- -- ti �\ , : _ 1 ` i=ce `I ' _1�• i i ■•1 _ t I i �t 1 i�■ . f , `YU �NdIT3Ntl�➢._.i., •,. ! f� _ G -if - -- I Xr - 1 .... - -_. 1_1' ti.A• `. i; -'� ” %- � -'4.•_ �.7 f:.:. 1; = •1 ... :'..'. .Y -ty" t .' t:- s',-i. - 1 is -t . - � I Ly,� •. ....� /�.- ;iii - -' !_'� i