Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985/09/11 - Agenda Packet0701 -02 0 9- 11 --85 P � c, Agenda Packed: o Pagel of 6 I ,5 N (D c CF ID t M [D 'S co Ln I J CO ,G r CITY OF ^� e RANCHO CUCANIONGk `�.�.�'i.r��i��Ti�G C o Ct��LISSZCI n �3 `o 'AG a 1 ' DA, 1977 WEDNEWAY September 11, 1985 7.100 P.M. LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LATE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, C.AWORNIA L Pledge of Allegiance R. Boll call Commissioner Barker Co ` Wssioner Rempel Commissioner ChitieS7 Commissioner Stout Commissioner MCNieI III. Announc6mvn W. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected, to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be ,removed for discussion. A. TIVI E EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 8218 - GOLDEN WEST EQUITY PROPERTIES, INC. - Located on the north side. of 71h Street, east side of Hellm-,,i Avenue - APW 209 - 171-49 through 56. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10088 - NICOSIA -• A residential subdivision of 82 acres into 131 single family lots in the Very Loco Residential District (1 -2 du /ac), located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Carrari Street-'APW 201- 071 -14, 37, 45. •zz - r z� �L 6 V.,-- Public Hearings, a The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may Voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized br the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name oind address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each profe, C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -02 - ISHII - The development of a one -story church of 14,740 square feet and an associated small storage building of 216 square feet, on 3.88 acres of land in the Very t Low Presidential Aistr.lct located on the northwest' corner of Haven and Hillside - APN 201 -101 -027. (Continued from f August 28, 1985 meeting. Related file: PM 9064) k D. ENVIRONMENTAL . PSSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9064 - k CHUFCH OF TUR LATTER DAY SAINTS - A division of 4.24 acres of l°u.,: into 3 parcels in the Very Lew Residential R, District (less than. 2 du/ac) locatedgn the :;�z cthwest_ corner of Haven and Hillside - APX 201 - 101 -02,. (Con, led from August 28, 1985 meeting. Related file: CUP 85-0,., , E. TENTATIVE TRACT 12642- K be B - A residential subdivision of 470 lots on 11.5 acres of land, which is part of Caryn Planned Community, located between the extension of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the north and south, and `between ,the.extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on the east and 'west - APN 225-14-08, A2 -19, 21 -28. The Commission will review propose -d ' modifications to the previously approved single family project, including dwelling unit sizes, and elevations. (Continued from August 28, 1985 meeting.) F. AMENDMENT TO TENTATIVE TRACT 12642 - KAUFMAN & BROAD - A request to amend the conditions of approval for 'Tentative Tract 12642 by modifying the landscaping standards for slope areas for a residential subdivision of 470 lots on 115 acres of land, which is part of a 'larger mw;ter' planned community, located between the extenion of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the north and south, and between the extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on the east and west - APN 225- 141 -08, 12 -19, 21-28. G. AMENDMENT TO TENTATIVE TRACT 12643 MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT - A request to amend the conditions of approval for Tentative Tract 12648 by modifying Lhe landscaping standards for slope areas for a residential subdivision of 463 single family lots on 10-4 acres of land in the C' aryn Planned Community (Phase 11), loci Lted on the north side of Highland Avenue, south sl"e of Banyan Avenue, west side of Rochester Ave .-=_, , a 'f of Milliken Avenue - APN 225- 141 -08, 12 -16, 18, 22, t4, `I16, 22, and 225- 151 =3, 7, 11, 13. i I3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -13 - Si_ W - A proposal to locate a caretaker's trailer on a C:hrie *iris tree farm located Gn 12.8 acres on the south side of Base Line, east of R.ocheski.> in a utility corridor - APN 227- 161 -33. I. ENVIRONMENTAL E FSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRA7GT 11928 - SALVATI - A residential sub - division and Des!gn Review for townhouse units on 5.85 acres of land in -i he Medium Residential ,� striei. (8 -14 du(ac) located on the no, th side of Highland Avc-iue, t 800 feet east of Archibald Aver ae - APN 201 - 252 -32'. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, AID CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -20 - HOYT LUMSER COMPANY -A request to construct a_*i. A00 square foot warehouse building addition to an existing ho ►c improvement center and the development of a master plan an 2 acres of land in the Office Professicnal ' District, located at 7110 Archibald, northwest corner of Archibald and Lomita Court - APN 202 - 151 -33. ¢ K. ENWRONIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND, CONDITIONAL USE t PERMIT 85-14 - MULLEI,. -The development of three office buildings totaling 53,226 square feet, and four industrial buildings tntalirg 159,704 square feet within an existing industrial site that has an Misting 148,009 square foot manufacturing building on 18.42 acres of lance in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) located at the northwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 209- 021 -16, 17, 5. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE°z'=M.ENT AND PARCEL MAP 9498 - , REiTER- RINKER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A division of 44 acres into 5 parcels in the Industrial Park District (Subarea n) and Havf n Avenue Overlay District, located at the northeast corner of haven Avenue and 4th Street - APN 210 - r: 3, and 16. (Related File: DR 85-31) i VI. New Business M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -31 - REITERfRINKER -- The development of a master plan for a 44 aeres o ice /business park and the first phase consisting of 3 office buildings totaling .88,900 square feet on 6.5 acres of land in the Industrial lark District (Subarea 6) and Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northeast corner of 4th Street and Haven Avenue - APN 210- 081 -1, 2, 3, 16. (Related File: Parcel Map 9498) N. MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - FS -17 '- EQUi A consistency determination between the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies and an exterior remodel to Equi's restaurant, located at 10006 Foothill Boulevard -APN 1377- 621 -26. VII. OJd Business O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -15 - ASSURED MINI- STORAGE - Construction of a mini- storage development; with office totaling 4F( 00 square feet on 1.17 acres of land in the Industrial Lark (Subarea 6) }District located on the north side of 4th Street Am and east of Turner Avenue- APN 210371 -03. VM. DirectoeYs Reports P. TREE ORDINANCE REVISIONS Q DESIGN REVIEW DUAL COMMITTEES lk. PuMe Comments 'Ns is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. X. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Adrh tistrative Regulations that set an 11 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, thsy $hall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA cuCAA40 STAFF REPORT° a l r o, 0 DATE: 51,otember 11, 1985 U TO: Planning Commission 1977 FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Krail, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 8218 - GOLDEN WEST EQUITY PROPERTIES INC. - Located on the north side of 7th Street, east side of Hellm,a n Avenue - APN 209- 171 -49 through 56 The tentative parcel map Was initially approved by the Planning Commission on October 26, 1983 for the standard 2 -year time period until October 26, 1985. Golden West Equity Properties, Inc, has recently perchased,this property and is requesting an extension of time to evaluate the property. This parcel map has beck reviewed and ha,S been found to be in conformance with the Industrial Sp•_eific Plan. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission grant a 12- month extension for Parcel Map 8218. The expiration date will be October 26, 1986. Respectfully submitted, f BRH:BK:de Attachments e p / I 3 _ .. � a. = y oil �lfi ' � xT' X>ti� y .f 1_ � B'7°� °+n• � � la ! j� .-.0 t bpt @�S� e`typryj75t� a�w y�} �� -y="R\ M1���R st��i •' �u 1 t 'k�.� -„ „� ��i ��.�1 � i�3i23 � 4:� {i RRO 'L Rar'8k pot 'k.c "a' mil r?r Q \ \� � ,�' i �= i ~ Vol R y tr _ �,�, � }� i �;-• ( r k''� 'I � � r : 1� to � � � •'�-�� kr z .h { _ ti '• F - � t c.�7 y.{•• t .,3 .emu+- iT �. r+ '• �nC1+ s=+' ts�. b' t7 1' �t ::.saK.�..�..arG.a,....�.,.,,.. •liar L..TL.:. .. _ ...r. � - , •i. August 1, 1985 Mr. Barrye R. _�.anson Senior Civil Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Parcel Map No. 8218 t Dear Mr. Hanson: The purpose of this letter is to formally request a time ex- tension for the above subject parcel map. Golden Nest Equity Properties, Inc. is requesting this time extension for.the 4 following reasons: 1. Golden West Equity Properties, Inc. recently purchased the property in -June, ,1985 and has not had sufficient time to properly evaluate the property. €. 2. Other parcels adjacent to the subject parcel map be included in development plans. A check for $62.00 is enclosed as the required fee for a time extension. It the above is acceptable please acknowledge by signature below and return a copy to us. Very truly yours, GOLDEN WEST EQUITY PROPERTIES, INC. Gregory Power GP /vs enclosures AGREED & ACKNOWLEDGED ` BY _ DATE 2990 East'•G" St. Ontario. California 9064 (714) 980 -2644 1'c -3 oC %ro CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAN-ION TGA n A, c' ENGINEERING DIVYSION Z > _ VICINITY 1l1rCF xi �t 821 D.R. 83 -•28 P�t;e APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: + Jack Lam, Secretary �,t RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 8218 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above- described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2 of Ordinai,ce 28 -8, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above- described tentative parcel map on October 26, 1983. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time. B. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval ` regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Develophent Code. I C. That there has been nrr significant changes to tha character of the area in which the project is located i that would cause the project to become conforming or 6 inconsistent with current standards. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a 1 time extension for: Parcel Map Applicant Expiration Golden West 8218 Equity Properties October 26, 1986 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: + Jack Lam, Secretary �,t Resolution Na. Parcel Map 8218 Page 2 I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rat:"tho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of September, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES; COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: L R CITY OF RAN;HO CUCAMONGA t I, RECWNDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: North side of 7th Stt',eet, east T'NTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO: 8218 r :•de of Hellman Avenue DATE FILED: 9/23/83 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A division of lots l thru NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 8 of Parcel Map 6724, as recorded in Book GROSS ACREAGE, 4.74 72, Pages 22 thru 24 of Parcel Maps, Records ASSESSOR PARCEL NO,209- 171 -49 thru of San Bernardino County, California 56 DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER /SURVEYOR Davis Development same Williamson & Schmid 1400 Bristol Street 17782 Sky Park Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92660 Irvine, CA 92664 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Cade of the City of Rancho Cucamangti include, but may not be limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets additional feet on additional feet on Additional feet on 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: X 5. Reciprocal access easements end maintenance agreements ensuring access to all ~ -Ircels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall by provided by C.C. &R.s and shall be recorded concurrent; wth the map. .1_ A -� 6, All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City E:ngineer's requirements. 7. Easements fat sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety 1. Surety shall be posted and. an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recording for and /or prior to building permit Issuance or". _____ 2. A lien agreement must je •,ecuted pritr, to recording of the map for the following:! X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all d7 -site drainage facilites necessary.for dawatering all .parcel to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Rivison pr.u_ to issuance of building permit. Street IImmprovements Pursuant to t -e it of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and Title cu Section the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordationcof�thetymap and /or building permit issuance. I. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all h31f- section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to building permit issuance for. Street Name Curb & Gutter Pvmt. Walk - At rive r. STrees Lights Overlay island* Other 7th St. re air repair X X X Hellman repair repair X X X X _.._.- — ,.11 "ONmy auu irr79aLiun or meter 0 X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of' -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any (,t %er permits required. 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered ` Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. T. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 3. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locutions and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the °City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles wl"n ! underground ser -ice. G X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Pl;�ning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. X 11. Concentrated drainage flours shall not cross sidewalks. Jndersidewalk drains shall be installed to City standards. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -.lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the finvl. map. X Z. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent , --reas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed ti the satisfaction of the City Engineer -4. Prior to recordation of the may), a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. S. A drainage detention basin per -City Standards shall be coustrurted to detain ,7creased runoff -3- r Grading X 1. Grad og of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work at time of development. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application cr grading plan theca. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee .and shall be completed prior to recordation of 1-fte final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever .comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuk:ace of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans for San Bernardi -io County Flood . Control District Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water X San Berra -�dino County Dust Abatement, (required prior to !r issu.i° 3f a grading perraiQ Other X 2. A copy of the t'v _ ntsy Conditions and Restrictions (G.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior tw recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prier to street constructon. X •4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be :designed to Cucamonga County hater District standards. A letter of acceptance is -required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from GalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map 411 b subject to any requirements that may be received from then;. _4_ r� X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same Use`; not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When bu,Bdiig permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asknd_to_,ccrtify the availability of capacity. Permits will not b4: issued utrless said certificztir- is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided 4n accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indic:kting widths, maximum ,s'7Tes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in ac's e with City trail standards, shali be submitted to and appro4d by the City Planner prior to recordation for r Viand /or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior -0 recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following Shell be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets) , copies of recorded maps and deeds used as refer-once nd /W1 ! showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X Agrermert submitted under Parcel Nap 6724 for the improvements - to 7th St. and Hellman must be extended. This request for extension must be approved by City Council. X 12. All applicable conditions of Parcel Map 6724 shall apply to this parcel map. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD O. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: E AIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAA Mo STAFF REPORT a J r ii •. DATE: September 11, 1985 TO: Ctairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lail; Community 'Development Director BY: John R. Meyer, Assistant planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TEN WrIVE TRACT 10088 - NICOSIA - A residential subdivision of 82 acres into 131 single- family lots in the Very 'Low Residential District generally located at the nartheast corner of Archibald and Carrari Street - APN 2,51 -Li. 14, 37 and 45. I. BACKGROUND: fhe applicant is requesting a twelve (12) month tine exens...cn�ror Tentative Tract 10088, as described above. The project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on October 13, 1982, and then extended to October 13, 1985' by the Commission on August 22, 1984. This is the last twel ✓e (12) month time extension available. II. ANALYSIS: At the time of review for the first time extension, staff identified the following inconsistencies with the basic development standards ror the Very ,,Low Residential District: average lot size, lot width, lot depth, frontage and solar access (see August 22, 1984 staff report). These items were not considered to be significant by the Planning Commission and the Commission approved. the time extension. No new inconsistencies have been found since this tracts last time extension approval. III, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant the final twelve (12) month t'ne extension for this project through the adoption of the attached Resolution. Res ectful ubmitted, Jack Lam Community Development Director JL:JM :ka ITEM B fPLANNING OOMMISSION'STAFF REPORT [entative %Tract 10088 - Nicosia September 11, 1985 li Page 2 I Attachments: Letter from Applicant, August 1, 1985 August 22, 1984 Planning. Commission Staff Report Exhibit "All - Location Map _ Exhibit "8" - Approved. Tentative Tract lmac, L Exhibit "C" _ Grading Exhibit RVl - Grading Exhibit E ^ Grading " Exhibit F " Grading Exhibit "G1 - Trail & Design Details Exhibit "N" - Conceptual Landscaping Planning Commission Minute! w /Conditions of Approval Time Extension Resolution of Approva', Q►` ic August 1, 1985 OR PLANNING DIREZ ;-OR Rancho lucamonga N4c of �. * Nq 4 City of 9320 Baseline Road, Suite G o� 40, ` oVs�snN�n q ` Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 �g . . Re: Tentative Tract No. 10088 Extension Request ip 6 Gentlemen, 1; We are the owners of 83 acres which is the subljcct of Tentative, Tract No. i t 10088 located on the east s'..de of Archibaid, north of Hillside in Rancho Cucamonga. We hereby respectfully request an extension of 1`lme to complete the final pla *,js necessary to record the subdivision. Our reasons for requesting the extension are as follows: 1. The prevailing '.market conditions for large, high priced homes is lepressed at this time. 2. The current economic, marketing and inventory conditions make it a unreasonabiejo record the map at this time. - 3. The process.; of developing the Alta Loma Che- -nel Assessment District delayed the development of final plans for Tract 10088. Thank you for your cons;daration of this extension. 1 am enclosing the, $62.00 / axtension application fee. Stn rely, Gera I Duce itiz Ale tet i GDIHJL :vv -cc: Stele Wheat 00 -3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAC MONCA CLCAnra STAFF REPORT O� _ F Z C1 > DATE: August 22, 1984 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner 1 BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 1M 88 NICOSIA - A residential subdivision of 82 acres into single- family lots in the Very Low Residential D1.=trict .generally located at the northeast corner of Archi6ald and Carrari Street - APN 201- 07 -14, 37 and 45. i I. BACKGROUND: The app'ticant is reque3ting a twelve (12) month time extension for Tentative Tract 10088, as described above. The project was originally approved by the Planning Cormission on October 13, 1982, and expires on October 13, 1984 -- ", the maximum time limit that may be granted by the Planning Commission for this map is twenty -four (24) months. j 11. ANALYSIS: Since the approval of this project, the new Development Code was adopted. Therefore, in order to 'consider a Time Extension, this project was reviewed for conformance with the Development Code requirements. Based upon this review, the following inconsistencies with the basic development standards for the Very Low Residential District were noted; 1. Average Lot 'Size - the Development Code requires a minimum net average lot size of 22,500 sq. ft. The approved Tentative Map indicates a net average lot size of 21,472 sq. ft. 2. Minimum Lot Width A minimum 90 ft. lot width is required �t the front (30`ft.) setback line, and required to vary s lO feet. Seven lots out of the total 131 lots do aci: meet this requirement, primarily on cul -de -sacs and kdockies. 3. Minimum Lot Depth - A 150 ft, lot depth is required as measured from the mid -point of the lot. Four Lots out of the 131 lots do not meet this requirement. 4. Minimum - Frontage - A 50 ft. minimum frontage is required at the front property line. Six lots out of 131 lots do not meet this requirement, primarily on cul -de -sacs and knuckles, ` ITEM C � r s PLANNING COMMISSIOI 'TAFF REPORT Time Extension for TT 10088'`Ilcosia August 22, 1984 Page 2 5. Solar Access - The Development Code requires that solar access easements be granted for all lots within residential subdivisions. The Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract,10088 do not require these solar access easements. These items were not considered to be significant by Staff and would not significantly after the appearance of the project. This project was one of the first subdivisions to be designed with special design mitigation techniques to provide streetscape variety, as shown in Exhibits "G" and "H". III. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Cormission grant a twelve ) month extension for this project through adoption of the attached Resolution. F Res ctful' submitted, f R ck o e ity Planner f G:DC:ns Attachments: Letter from Applicant, October 13, 1982 Planning Commission Staff Report Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Approved Tentative Tract Map Exhibit ' "C" Grading Exhibit "D" - Grading Exhibit "E" - Grading Exhibit "F" Gradinc, Exhibit "'G'I Trail;`. Design Detains Exhibit "H" - Concei.!tual Landscaping Planning Commission !of Approval with Conditions Time Extension Resolution of Approval NORTH - CITY OF RANCHO C,'CAIN- IO`GA TITLE:�I����.�F' _ PL.ANNIN DIVISIC,�-N EKI- firu'T'- ,SCALE =_ • OHONVU d dVW NOlswcanS UJ I LN NOE ri 1311, ZK - Ag ;•1\ 1 $ rr •tit�����j �a LLI IM yy ! 1 0b �» 1 A O 8 � a \� SN• . �1 x �r r. 1 � 1 g;�;, - - 1 moil3 s a tln.Now 3no e ila OH3NVU lo (.3 f 0 •s ° " ` «�^~ . ZZ ' . �' 1-1-ki Li OH3wH JO ° " ` «�^~ . ZZ ' . �' � 33i a x 11 i;�,-, a in `fI I kl*\- b N� VONOwvono a 101130 MV 5NOLLOSS- � F S sit if z ita U- F at 1 � 1 2~ \�'• «l I g 9 U- ;�E U �QSQ @ pd€ ee �iiu� F at 1 � 1 2~ \�'• «l OHONVU - �m�ryoo �avos�rro-a ♦ OUIO 4 _ Jilt JCL V Y :Y r ! i Z a: o o� r ¢sxWO I , a iia9 0. s = U ° _ °v W LU �!V ! \` ! f� 1'1. i w \' -. •° a ', fir°' i l ]�� � � `� � $f• �_ as � h,- `'� /� — °p �I 0.G• �1 °`. 3!, e. ; i. . ` i r C; � tic <• a "# 1 w � 1 ` ft F IN Is • `° — _� \1 ; / 31N3AV '- t Gltl9i>,OHV r, v ME D RESOLUTION NO. 82 -93 A 'RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAt NO. 10088 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10088, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Nicosia, Webb and Sutter, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing_ the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of CaiiforRia, described as 82 acres of land located generally on he .northeast corner of Archibald and Cer rar i Street and being divided into 131 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on October 13, 1932; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set f,.rth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No.. 10088 and the Map thereof": (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or 4mprovp.�rjnts of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or, their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. _A Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10088, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION r 1. This approval shall become null and void, if the Tentative Tract Map is not approved and recorded within twenty -four (24) months of ._this approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning t Commission. 2. Front yard zet`'ack lines shall be recorded on cul- de-sac and ::suckle lots in accordance with Zoning Ordinance width requirements. 8. Reveiw Lnd approval of dwelling units by the City shall use the "streetscape° guidelines developed by the applicant in order to create interest and variety to the community appeara�ice. 4. The Community Trail along Archibald shall not be greater then twenty (20) feet in width, as measured from the 0 timate curb location. e 5. The landscape accents shown on the conceptual landscape plan Khali be installed and bonded for with the street €mprovement, G. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified - engineer to determine if there are any active fault traces within the vicinity of the project site. If traces are found, then all dwellings for human habitation shall be setback fifty (50) feet from the fault trace.. This report shall be conducted, and reviewed and approved by the City prior to approval of the final map. i. A local interior feeder trail shall be provided along the north boundary at lot 49 and between lot 49 and 50. ENGINEERING DIVISION4 S. The developer shall be required to install croncrete drainage structures along Alta Lorna Channel from its. northerly debris basin to the proposed channel at D :3 Resolution No. 'Page 3 Wilson Avenue and along the watercourse from the terminus of the proposed storm drain within the tract boundary to Alta Loma Channel. The cost of _these stormdrainagp systems shall be credited against the stormdra­,�,ige fee for the project and a reimbursement dt1reement per City Ordinance 75 will be - executed to cover the contributions which exceed the fee amount. 9. The above condition shall be waived when and if an Assessment District is formed to complete the installation of an improved channel. 10. All offsite drainage easements as shown on the Tentative Map shall be recorded concurrent with or prior to recordation of the map. 11. The debris basin, diversion 1':vee /channel and flood protection walls as shown on the Tentative Map shall be redesigned to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 12. If the ultimate design of the proposed north /south storm drain from the debris basinr',zquires an open channel, the width of easement shall be modified to accommodate it. 13. All onsite stormdrainage systems shall be designed per City's standard specification with an -added requirement that velocity -depth product of runoff on the street shah not exceed 6. 14. A minimum of 36 -feet wide pavement within 40 -foot dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed on Almond Avenue from the tract boundary to Hermosa Avenue. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 15. The final design of the debris basin shall include appropriate safety precautions such as fencing, gates and signs.. In addition, landscaping, consisting mainly of trees, shall be planted around the perimeter of the basin. 16. The design of the cul -de -sac -along lots 127 -131 shall be redesigned. The project shall provide a minimum of 40 feet of right -of -way and an offset: cul -de -sac on the project side. The design of the Resolution No. t� Page 4 cul�de -sac shall not change the condition or access to existing properties -and homes in the area unless _ an agreement is reached between landowners. 17. Final landscape and trail plans eshall provide for screening and buffering of the lots along Archibald through the combinatioy of such things as dense, landscaping, berming and walls." Any fencing or walls along Archibald shall be with like materials whether it is installed by the developer or future owner. 18. The oak tree near or on lot 131 shall be preserved. 19. Final design of the access and any access oarriers to the fire road along lots ?,'1, 77 and 7 ( shall be. coordinated through the City Engineer's office and between area homeowners, Fire District, and,affected utility companies: Final designs shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval. APPROVcD AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, '982. PLANNING COMMISSION 0 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONr, RY• -Jef r Ki g C rm n - -_ ATTE T: ecretary of the Planni69 Commlssion I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Ranchc Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly ana' regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planninli Commission of they' City of Rancho Cucamonga, regular at a meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES:, COMMISSIONERSc STOUT, BARKER', MCNIEL, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: KING 26 Eb ° f J g w o 0 > ti` a r VS S a 0 O � y C L O � D Gad = '°u ba obN °'N L E CLOT °.A Y 4= L .. u a O L n. �° .°•G�q F.a ° >.a L C G Z � K.. � �.• _ U A a. u ` r C • b✓ ° < ^ C Y E.fI C ° V.r 1 L •s u N L <S D. > N ` r. � L � •, E v is Nr N o � n ... O °T ` OC ON V r O Y E u% b o d T C mu E T b< > On C F L C eu �. 7.2 C a L' °- VTU O O++qy ^ r ° � qT c. Tiov L. v b °.T. Y .-2. bFO vo NT.� v - a AC OV O� 0i .°i.�. w.c cc C 'u a Crp mq FE b 4 y na N1iC , —pa 4-0E 3 n ^ m q E •Li•r. L. 'o0N EL L N. L d u G.S V mO gOg < °a tY,• °.EOe 3 C cO io a '. 73 u° Ou N O LO n al... L •OU d 6Y °.� nd•+i`O` � ni C z > .^CC Y. o u V C L�•r F u 6NY y EaL C ,N ^ N ° 4^ 32u M pE < O L n n b O Nd °y - J. O ' O n TO V bo. a'" Y < t° E = �" E O O r _ V1d L E. tOUq N9u C E .+L•v°iu t a ^ Q G4 Qq vID CI ^I �I au qL y F 'C4 4C CI O ° .oil II f NI � H • • • y N C N � D Gad = '°u ba obN °'N L E CLOT °.A Y 4= L .. u a O L n. �° .°•G�q F.a ° >.a L C G Z � K.. � �.• _ U d r-1 a. u ` r C • b✓ ° V.r 1 N tlD > N ` N L {4 ..• _ � n ... O SCI [[.I� Er o r ° � qT c. Tiov L. v b °.T. Y .-2. bFO vo NT.� v - a AC OV O� 0i .°i.�. y° N q.D 9 'u a Crp 0 u _ Vw °•r t Y yoL =D Y p _ C •tea NY. O � ^ ^' `u < G� 32u M pE O yI ~ ` G ` �'° N� T ° bt OVy L E. tOUq N9u •SP V ° u6 Cm O O S au qL y F 'C4 u �. .�. c O s Y� v Loo vu N. L n U U t '°u ba obN °'N L E CLOT °.A Y 4= L .. u a O L n. �° .°•G�q F.a ° >.a L C G Z � K.. � �.• -- Z° a. u ` r C • L > N f. eC •. 1i Y i � wY Nv 6 C A • JY L O� O C� PM w ° "' °u " u J.'�. " NrL c c c v o ppo 4L -� u ° u. �nco` El - o ^ Y ^ a.0 o c7 y « w bom my VAp oaa tr a.. q -i °� C pG VO uAA N iT LO 4.G `ad G dCG p NP G GJ 4P iid E E�f ad L G Y N bOrO M L c G qA Aw n•G -1 t xN ��a- L •wM N N O.'' ^ ° Q AC Nr'� i ° Y G c u o _ Y A n 4 ucos�e.°.L ae o r� w ra PsLO, a. Lu �� C1 � C 9 t 0 G ✓ �. L S � G Y N G r M� L J ° L NL.6 Y' � GEEaC n �r � i u pA= L L P L NSNG .�M mnV GLIA 06 O a� ^Er nyG Oi N'a q ^a Eu66 qwY wow r ° NO `JFF RX A c C4 4: _;x t o � W . °e N 1p yan L y ra Eu `Oe aure ca 4 _a Pvo r'+n� R Iasi A� ni AY E. % ttN 75" OG N° A n u 'a L v "M i<iJ rb Gqu •.° �L.� v_O N ' A °Yti� +u� L6 ` 9 y.. N Q a .Lw �i r u ° UL . r r ' + a �w ° G N � O PG ° 4 ' C � � ^qq G. w G G IT L L Y p G �.! a .. IS C E EY S � w4 r'U9a A L^ X06. �Vd. OL. bL `L bbr °r nyV C2 G u 4 CCr a G G VL� G C by d A �q ~NG� Cap _Uh ^GCS Nq. 4 A9 O�V S.J �q� �C "q ..y. N S�G'_fEI� .O N LO b •p9 4 ��S � ° yC r. a. N' .A ° 2 L dL�G� Olt° _C LVA1 �.Y A. C L w GEN d •° P C WN `^IGJ° LL 'rL d.'.O wNiGi N. Q° ar `yUr Ley ^Vv A 'i.c u.o LGC °q v °q.. .A aa���� c.'c. A v e .+- Q o a '.� L ^y" c G .a Q c. i r p Ay G.L �N Cw LP�V b6 = Cy. a g. d GjAC TP ia2lz .+r d V.CN 4C�. G7 Y p L n r _ N Li a 4J _N ar aY YO Qy d O+ CG.�C a°�S OI aNgJ E= a' ^COG OJT � u> �+ 2 c c N d` q a4. aaO O O bV C' P OON rd L ... b �3 ,. .�w L l E j ZZ NY vz= � ..... V !vGlof,_at t ar �O f P d n ZE C G W « L Og L 4 Cr C O�> C O 6 w V i Vu P L., ° v -•>+ a uLG <� o tzli o gz ~' U v6 ?•- C. ,O y p0 Od ` EA .- O C ti C C o u "u e a _G o. u °Y E.o uVt " N, ... 6'T > 69uO- i n 6EE d� NGLO V Ve MN.^y NC np Pvi d .+ aGL' O y V a b. Poo c0 L A u « T d ' ° u L.� Rd N a.L N L. ndr v 3 q«q '� V « N G •4 L^ > O A v G N O J N •O V` I VD�V CN CA HU� Q A .O V Q q 9.. C �E V I °c ?__^ uc u co Lg G L CZ pyz ,..2 9 u < ` q o L y 9N E `L J s� 9 9 Y j SV� y 9 A W g L ^NL •Y `O >.�". ^. Y _N< do O Z.0 y� CR r y oc+E« uY� MPS K Y. N A " +.> o L R c2 z a _4z .a° `�u Oa L' ^M L� W L ° ~ O C E GGG E�uC .': u AC C G C� O u_p O t6� •i�A - L GPy uG TNOi Tv 9� ^pe? « GR ' CV�C d.G rE0 «�C ^ ax MF b « �y Gb NC O D S G .. �.� N G C G A C p i L= Fc oco` -qb y9 -Q 12 Az 'c a -.a L... +« a U. . N C F V 9 m E D OGO .^ o a `- C N x L E L G 44 ° b Lt UCu` q 2.4�� � G ° A °. . 'EL ° ° � 6�E °. 9 O C9 G • L t'- d > t.Si uI ut �.^ ^> •. N p� '- Nr LGCGG -G e. .. O P = G. N . •� 1.� Q J �.• ^ i i L May G P � V9 YO`ip O� w G Gy��•� LU p• O - G Pu. i- ..'nw Y• V �� „Q — T. H a < O y N v u.n a u w Y W 'A R o � y aL• w N y _� N `ti co Y^ ° a H Y V op — O.q N L� N r`rf OL L Yp W` O S 's � n w. O u i� N•O RyL VwY +J' "if Q y uL" Ay ci A n4u a Q Ow.0 dY RE vH rt �-c'- "c co v°L YOJ mow: CcN Gh ai �2r Hw 4 w L o� Lu Y u� a ` 4� A� n� w N A `on L si n °r O O O�V �y bhi C � u 7y Q NO H d O C V l 7 Y O a � �v wr w L L _q u n _ >Y>M DE d wl L° _ L` G NY w -G vnw Z' � �.d _o .'+a Llrt yy O Y S2 t.0 �N. 4> •jam ' E .n a..n A c ^'� 'v G ✓�.' d o e r Y G O m n O U.G N 4 n Y ••' Q 20 C Q G� 6 E L •^ Q _ L a' � ` G � � L 6 , .emu O L. • G � .O L. Ei 7O a C d o ° C9wL M u u C L� C' 2 YW �CYi .0°� l u � �• L d _ { V O v >` _ SM YO Lo LI ti L"v LLOO - E G q° a w �.a 7 d c P ti aLEP u CS di LOL ^JL P< �S � ., 4a GG I = IOM Eyn P OG tw_ -NO 4 � U Z4 Z&s i j ^Tvv �"^` S ' _ u u^ _�- r � � �p 1 �T 1 � 1- c�iE C � u u � � _ � x p d q � __ + 4 ��. �.� N .. �! � c.i.�=. D � CU._ b J = ? ura 'p {� �e .�. V 4 �O u w p -_�� y a vow.: �> ` tpL ° v ou <.. 'I � C3Y `o C Y EN E' C V p V p P �".S C ^. rd C 4 L C n Q�V `..� �4 � �' o p a. C L' '^ '6 ^NO i T � y E� uW� C L. ° � � c y .. C. � � V N z ° 7 C ._ L > " owo `c L..V. N.L ? v i �' L' a . _ �tJVG p..a C CT � i� C ' e �`c L Ep Lu.. E � �� L _ 'c _ N � y .0 u f� = G b G.. L ._ p v� • C � O .�.' L' p � C•� T L OV ✓ J t p. � � gip. O Ct L t� J v �. L LL E ..- � 7 T � i ��Gp �C. r 2 66 6 -, _ p C L LINO L..G C p.0 pS1 O �� > _ � u - : � t TV � nT n ' L 4t C `� t � C Up V,nc p ]� �. u � G4 = p.. C• E aV� L G� . ` , a a �..: �. t a=t �� + �! vl .7j \r � �� It � ^ �� l Commissioner McNiel stated that he checked this out at 6 p.m. and there were only about 5 cars in the entire complex and there was nothing much,gping on. 16 Notion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 82 -92, amending Condition No. 1 of the Planning Divi,3ion to 7 p.m., Monday through Friday. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVH TRACT NO. 10086_- NICOSIA - A residential subdivision of 82 acres into 131 jingle family lots in the R- 1- 20,000 zone, generally located at the northeast corner of Archibald and Carr r-i Street - AFN 201- 071 -14, 37 and 45. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report explaining a change of design in the cul-de -sac. He indicated '.hat there had been no offer of dedication and the applicant must therefore provide a 45 -foot dedication. Vice- 4,hairman "ympel opened the public hearing. Mr. Lee Fabb, applicant and co -owner of the subject property, stated they were in general agreement with the staff report and conditions €•.ttaehed to the project. Commissioner Stout stated that he noticed a number of lot lines are not perpendicular to the street line and asked if grading is done, will problems occur with boundary lines between the properties. Mr. Webb replied tiiat this will be the type of treatment that has occurred at Deer Creek which is multilevel and not cu :and fill. Mr. Hopson asked if Mr. St:ut's concern is that a property owner will not be able to get the correct property line becan9e it is not perpendicular to the street. Mr. Stout replied that this is his concern. Mr. Doty, Planner for this project, replied that when this is laid out it will have curb and gutter and the property will be marked for homeowner's lots. Mr. Jack r rkering, Hidden Farms Road and Archibald, stated his concern for the entrance to this development. He stated that whereas most developments have two accesses, the only access to this development is south on Archibald. He indicated that he lives on the corner which is why he is so concerned. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, replied that there is another access through the back of the tract to Hermosa. He indicated that the location of the street is to the south end of the tract. He indicated that what is proposed is better from an engineering standpoint because it results in less traffic and congestion overall at Archibald. Planning Commission Minutes -4- October 13, 1982 5 /� $� -fit \1 + Mrs. Evelyn Pickering, 9684 Hidden Farm Road, stated that the access that is indicated for the north side of the :tract would probably orjy be utilized by the people who border that part of the road. She indicated that hardly anyone goes into the mountains. She indicated further that most everyone works either at the southern or western areas and .°sults in many people coming out at one point. She felt that the approach the City is taking towards access was foolish. Mrs. Shirely Hudlow, resident, asked about the catch basins in the northern part of the tract and if there is uncertainty that catch basins will be ilstalled, where the :rater will drain. Mr. Rougeau stated he would defer to Mr. Doty to answer that question.. Mr. Doty replied that there will be a debris basin south of the tract and any water will go into the Alta Loma Channel. Mr. Vairin stated that if the debris basin isn't needed or X a larger one is needed, it will require reziesign and notification in order to comply with the Subdivision Map Act. Mr. Brad McCall, 9795 Carrari, stated he was delighted that something is happening with this property and asked where the applicant proposes to put the model homes. ® Vice- chairman Rempel stated that at this point there is no design on model homes and that this is a custom lot tract. He indicated that he applicant can do two things; build houses and come back to Design Review'cr take and sell lots to individuals who will then build their own homes. D)_,ther, that if the applicant is going to build, they must come through the Planning Commission and Design Review. Mr. Mr Call asked when the project is going to start. Mr. Webb replied that they propose to begin the middle of next year and it would be done in four phases at the rate of twenty-five percent per year. Mr. Vairin stated that the reference made to model homes has a requirement for adequate parking so that it will not impact on the neighborhood. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Barker commented on the concerns raised by thei Pickerings and asked how much relief would be gained by using the proposed access. Mr. Vairin replied that it may not be feasible to have access on "J" street. He further stated tha6 the northeast corner access will connect and will be provided at the appropriate phase and that will be whenever they get to it. W. Vairin indicated that the developer will have to provide final maps on the phases and they will be examined at that time. Further, that this is at the top of Archibald and traffic is not expected to be significant. Planning Commission Minutes -5- October 13, 1982 -as C C t Commissioner Stout asked if the Commission can require permanent lot markers to be placed at the back of the lots- Vice-chairman Rempel stated that State law requires this within the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Commissioner Barker stated that he is on the Design Review Committee and this project ka the first one that he has seen come back after having gone through drastic changes. tie commended Mr. Webb YIor their professionalism and skill in making this a very nico project. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt Rezolution No. 82 -93, approving Tentative Tract No. 10088, with the addition of five conditions contained in the addendum recommended by stafr. Vice- chairman Rempel stated for the record that a letter has been received from Mrs. Cadera relative to this item„ 7 :55 p.m. The Planning Commis¢_,n recessed 8:05 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened a-aamu aw. c 1 —Ul — 1CIVTATIVK TRACTS 11801 -11805 - ALLEN - A total planned development of 76 condominium its on 11-03 acres of land v, the R-3 and R -1 zones located at the nor west corner of Highland and Haven Avenues - APN 201- 272 -28, 30, 31, and 3 Associate P1anil�._ Dan Coleman, reviewed the staff report. Senior Civil Engineer, aul Rougeau, spoor of the improvements to Alta Loma Avenue. He indicated th an agreement must be made with the developer regarding the improvements. a indicated that after discussion it was felt that the best method of bandlin this is to asphalt the street and hydro:�eed the area until the future street i needed. Mr. Rougeau stated this would be a good ompromise because if they don't get improvementa now, it is doubtful that they ould be able to get them in the future. Mr. Rougeau stated, however, that th had not yet been discussed with the developer. Me. Rougeau indicated that a result of this would be that this temporary street would have asphalt pavin curbs and gutters, and with the grass, this could be used as a large Saw. Commissioner MoNiel asked how large an area he is talking ab t. Mr. Rougeau replied that it would be the width of the street and �for about 100 feet. He indicated that this would be maintained Ly the Homeowne Association. F Planning Commission Minutes -6- 0ctobEr 13, 1952 a. li' l RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10088 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.83 (b) of Ordinance 28 -b of the Subdivision Ordinance. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above- described Tentative Tract 10088. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed mLeket climate for development of the >roject. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. C. That strict enforcerent of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consisten'L with the intent if the Development Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be 'I detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properH — oe improvements _ in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a .nw. extension for Project Applicant Expiration TT 10088' Dunitz /Leventhal October 13, 1986 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF fHE CITY,OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Jack Lam, Secretary Aw s .1 I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Pianning Commission of the City of �Iancho Cucamonga, do hereby 'certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly, and regularly introduced passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission-of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of September, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERSa NOES: COMMI: ;SIMMERS, ABSENT: C.OMMISSIMERS ;` D DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY Qr RANCHO CUCAN. ONGA STAFF REPORT aepzemoer li, s<<5 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Jack 6_am, Community Development Director Howard Field_, Ass'estant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -02 - RON ISHII To allow the 'development of -� one -story church (14,740 square Feet), and associated small storage building (216 square feet), on 3.88 acres in the Very Low Residential District located on the northwest Corner of Haver, and Hillside = APN 201- 101 -027. s~.. w ajie I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site plan, elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Existing Land iJse: Very low Residential, vacant. C. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning North - Existirg sin le- family residences, Very Low Residential less than 2 du /ac). South - Vacant, Very Low Residential (less than 2 du /ac). East Existing sin ?le - family residences, Very Low Residential less than 2 du/ac). Rest - Existing sin le- family residences, Very Low Resident' al Mess than 2 dulac). D. General Plan Designations: IroJecctSite - Very Low Residential North Very tow Residential South -- Very Low Residential East - Very Low Residential -West - Very Low Residential E. Site•Characteristics, The project site is a vacant corner lot with steep sloping terrain of approximately 7% grade from north to south and 4% from east tc west. The site is sparsely populated wit-h =:" ,ds and shrubs, and contains -no significant tr_es or landforms. ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 85 -02 RON ISHII September 5, 1985 Page 2 ;, 1 I1. BACKGROUND: On July 24, 1985, the Planning Commission reviewE. CUP 85 -02 ( hurch of the Latter Day Saints) and expressed concerns over the roof mass which took up two - thirds of the building scale, and requested the applicant to explore adjustments and variations to the roof plane, which was too linear (180 feet). The Commission diected staff to work with the applicant to resolve the aforementioned concerns. _ III. ANALYSIS: . A. General: The 14,740 sq. ft. church will have a fixed seating capacity oO 257 seats, requiring a total of 124 parking stalls. The internal site circulation is adequate to accommodate the proposed use with ingress and egress occurring via Haven Avenue and along Hillside Read. The applicant has proposed the use of low terraced walls for the dual purpose of providing attractive landscape planters at the northeast and southeast portions of the project site and to to ?e up grade with 3 foot %­'<aining walls. The northern perimeter wall will act in toe same fashion, providing a terraced planter and 6 foot high block wall for retaining purposes as a mitigation measure for the steep terrain. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee recommended revisions to the building elevations such as breaking up the roof mass with stucco fascia and for architectural detail adding long columnar windows, glazed tile, and bronzed louvers to the east elevation (Exhibit "E "). The applicant complied with the Committee's request; however, the Committee expressed concern over the height of the roof line (35 feet). C. Equestrian Trails Committee: The Equestrian Advisory Committee recommended approval of the project subject to dedication of a 20 foot community parkway trail along Hillside & Haven and driveway providing a heavy broaa, finish for the crossing. Also, the Committee felt that a single railing is an adequate 'r uarrier. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study :as been compl� eted y the applicant. Staff has completed Part I, of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse impact on the 'environment as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with said findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 85 -02 - RON'ISHII September 5,.1985 Page 3 IV. FACTS YOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent 1~operties or cause significant adverse environmental. impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together' with the recd amended conditions of approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report as a public hearing. In addition, the property was posted and notices advertising, the public hearing were sent to ail property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning C{ anission consider all input and elements of this project. If af,;er such consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respec fully b fitted, T Jack Lam Community Development Director JL:HF:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "8" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations (per P.C. 7/24185) Exhibit "E" Revised Elevations Exhibit "F" Conceptual Landscape roan Exhibit "G" - Grading Plan initial Study, Part II Resolution of Approval with Conditions IG �y iL JOD 40@ 6 = 00 x oO ace µ , HAVEN CL • , s �araer• satpsalll Ana sale l� � � i � ,� C A wxt arre� es.. Fltw - t11�16110 N�t��f�� a f� E i_ �j � �lii � • ' s i�a H z rp 0-i I I I I - . F iE 4 Et .t I • "wig- it 1 o to a re e+an�id_a bhi a assoeietrs ..Yhaa.. r. UIZ-W Ll _ Cs� 3 J y �a 6 i t G .07 s. khl as. khl a assocla4es ,.aA.�t� - `— m ou nna� �a. rune r Mu�ur. eus�ena tms mwt mn �W.r.» {I 'r is � t__ t _ � i CiYf�• 1 \, iCKAT,(d L.� i �fOtiitC4 �p+rtur snrssva.an ' u.r��n� M,rrrr.w �� �/ .I �� .i� �� .. ,� to •a5i �,^ —E t l r I S 41 ell NEWWWWO r o = r FI �ywjj' iE 3 Yi c, • a\� 41 ell NEWWWWO r o = r FI �ywjj' iE 3 �`WIILPaa )� alp � .rjra a t a ��` �•� t. daSU■ f• Una iil al � —i '�l c, • a\� f I ) _1 rl`M L a Y t,_ �`WIILPaa )� alp � .rjra a t a ��` �•� t. daSU■ f• Una iil al � —i '�l 11 J f � i j JI CITY OF TWICHO CUCA.KQNGA PART II < INITIAL STUDY ENVIRON:tENTaL CHECKLIST DATE: .'5&F1* 7- Al, lfd SLr. APPLI%nrT: L,- t�t2Cfi r7 -/ 01- �✓3y/`l�l�(!'S FILING DATE: . 2 t'. �r 3" SLOG NU1 ER;_ Lf l% Y"T ^ 02- PROJECT: PROJECT LOCATIO.S:,?fj>1;7- I. ENVIR011MML IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MIME NO 1. Soils and Ceoloay. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes •-n geologic relationships' I - b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or r burial of the soil? c. .Change in topography or ground surface . contour intervals? d. Tha destruction, covering or madification Of any unique geologic or physical, features? i i e• Any potentia;, increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affectin^ either on or off Site conditons? i £• Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition: ..._ g• Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-. slides, ground failure, or•Similar hazards? C h. An increase in the rate of extraction and/or ( use of any mineral resource? ` AML 2. :i•dro12 . Rill the proposal have significant results In; Pa$e 2 i • XE5 :-YBE \0 a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing streams, r rivers, or ephemeral stream cbannels7 � 1 b. Changes, in absorp =ion rates, drainage _ patterns, or the rate and amount of s•irfnce water runoff? / y/ c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? _ — ' v d. Changa in the amount of -1irface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface i water quality? f. Alteration , groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity o' d either through & rwc ;!,z4iitionsortwith- drawa''s, or through interference x art aqr +�fer ? i Quality' [/ h. The reduction in the amour, of water other- wise ava :.lable for public ater supplies? b/ i. Expcsure cf people nor property to watez related hazards such as flooding r -- — or seichea? 3. air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results 1G in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile 'or indirect sources? Stationary scurces? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference wit: >: the attainment of applicable air quality standards? C. Alteration _on of local or re ianal climatic coati c conditions, affecting air mov -rent, moisture or temperature? p re. 4. Biota Fora. Will the proposal have significant results ina . a. Change in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, L.: number of any species of Rlants? s [` b. Reduction of the nusbers of nnp unique, rare or endangered species of ;alarms? ' + _ t/ C. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant vesults in: a. Change in the characteristic,; of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. introductica of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a oarrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? S. Fooulation. Will the proposal have significai:t results in: a. frill the proposal alter the location, distri- )=ion, density, diversity, or growth :ate of the human popular-ion oc as area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or cre :te a demand fOV additional hoilsing? 6. So_io- Economic Factors. 4?i21 the proposal have significant results in: A- Change in loca:, or region— sscio- "Clomic characteristics, iicl%iding e.ono.:,i: •:r comae. °cial diversity, tax rate, an: property values? b- 'gill project costs bL equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land -Use and Planning Con.,iderations. Will the proposal have significant results iu? a. A substantial 3-r ` the present or planned lar, ._ A conflict with am ahjectives, policies, or adopted 101 governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or 7uantity of existing cn.naumPtive or non- co' r.a4jmpt ve recreational opportunities? page 3 YES NO JA106 l A Page 4 YES ;LkY3E NO 6. Tcanacortatton. Will they proposal have uignificant results in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular mcvement? r �' b. Effects an existing streets, or demand for j new street construction? r/ c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or ~ d-:mand for new parking? v/ & Substantial impact upon existing transport -- tion systems? / e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion o, movement of people and /or goods? _ f. Alteratijns to or effect on present and potenti,,i w:-ter- borne, rails mass transit or air trv.ffic - J g. Increases in traffic harardv to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? F 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have Significant results in: a. A distur`.an i> to the integrity of archaeological, paleonto.ugical, anat'cr historical resources' V 10. Health, Safety, and Nuisan e Factors. Will the proposal hay, significant results in: f a,. Creation of any health hazard or potential `ralth hazard? b. Exposure ci people to potential health hazLv .? c, A risk of exltilosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. I:- crease in existing noise levels? r. Exposure of peopi> to potentially dangerous noise levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors? _ h• At increase in light or, S glare? M ' Page-, . YES LaYfiE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista / or view? �/ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? C. A conf.1ct with the objective of designated r or potential scenic corridors? _ v 12, Utilities ._and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? d c. Communizations systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facil.itils? f. Flood control structures? E. Sol d waste facilities? h. Fire protection? r -- i. Police protection? ✓ J. Schools? k. Parks or Other racrc3tional facilities? Y 1. Maintenance of public f•�cilities, including Y roads and floou control facilities? m. Other governmental. nervicrs? 13. Enerev, and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have.significant results in. a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing �- s,=ces of energy? J 1/ c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources Of energy? t! d. An increase or perpetuation of the consunpti m x` of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sourcen of energy are avallaale? 5 0 "' Page 6 YES MAYBE NO e. Substan"Lial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a.. -rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate / Important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve v short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs is a relatively brief, de•cinitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of a, individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIROMMITAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). /6.G. � � ,�of,EcTGfIiGG..lJis`rsyor!✓1✓L Ais�l�lC.�- �,,�s�.c/, Sow J qcG I�S�6aTs o f' 6•erv��.riS • � <iE �- .e.4�i.✓6 Co/r�irl. T�,E� i9.e/b �3tl�G� i� ...: /.��T, Lf/l'�iG�� /.v �"�rzy GUitG �Sfi�t./z.9TE /J.C7.c'YTc��r/.9G , fCli2fi9G� p�f!iti- o,��` S Page 7 III. DETS7NINATIO`I On the basis of this initial evaluation: I fiat the.proposE3 project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environments and a NEGATIV' 4 DECLARATION , will be prepared. I -find that although the proposed project could have. a significant Affect on 1:he enviroi It, there Will not be a significant effect In nhis.case because "tne mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLAR,\TIOI WILL $E,p_zmpAReA. I find the proposed project a #y have -,a significant effect pn,the ervirnm�enty and an ENVIRONIMIT J`LPACIr REPORT is required. Date Signature Title � -rte RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CO "?OITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85 -02 FOR RON ISHII LOCATED AT THE NORTHNEST CORNER OF HAVEN AND HILLSIDE IN THE VZRY L012 RESIDENT ?AL DISTRICT WnEP.EAS, on the 20th day of February, 1985, a complete applicat %:,n was filed by Ron Ishii for review of the.above- described project; and WHEREAS, on. the 11th day of_ September, , 1985,, the Rancho _Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Con-- nission; resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findin-s can be met: 1. That the proposed use is zn accord with the General' Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together, with the conditions applicable thereto, will not bf, detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with- -each. of the applicable provisions of the Development Coda. SECTION 2: -hat this project will no" create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on September 11, 15g5. SECTION 3: That Condi'ional Use Permit No. 85 -02,, is approved subject to the lZ TTowing conditionsc DESIGN REVIEW; 1. Frovide 10 feet landscape planters along West and north property line. 2. Construct 20 fi,,;, wide equestrian trail along both Maven Avenue and Hillside Road per City standards. 3. Design e'_evations for the small storage building shall be k similar in- materials and compatibility with the 'main church sanctuary and shall be approved by the City Planner i before issuanci of building permits. Resolution No, CUP 85 -02 ISHII Page 2 4. Provide 6 foot block wall design with decorative cap, and shall be approved by the Design Review Committee before issuance of building permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Jack Lam, Secretary I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Commission ;of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, d,, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and Aft regularly introduced, passed, and ,adopted by the Planning Commission of the Cit.; of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held- on the 11th day of September, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: f^ r� L V qk- MG c>.�o L�MU cq o:e. ^a. •O.°.. =c N�u. d� .d .G q p`^ NNO tiL p.apiO � L >q. n p V' T O Y A �_ d 9 0 L �« �� •Li 6i vAy cp. d on� E _ _V q��L. u nR� « C9 A 'dam LT do A Vy G P ^L dSp E. yy0i C 4�yaa°a�OF.d qN ua=i.LO uy- M 9M d2yY La Oath A NCL EE �� O dZ GO aG CO ^ ^Ep 0 O G a" _ cAO v 4 c YP A C d•) G'a O p.� jV a r EO _ y >Y p . .—P q W u o d o 0 « L E n0 �6 EtT d �ds ° o d dq p uu v 84!- U O G N y aL O O d L Or 9 O,U V V. O u E - 6 OaY i.•u A.ovi N11% lxz-: "� r onN u ¢N =u «s GI m , ! E _ t C 2. H d q L A t O 1 NO n W-0 `C F T � day V UY61 a�iO L J a n « L E aO V C ! f'! c z t{��-i q aT YVy V N.pr E O O . t ad Se q 0 G add Y k7— O Y 0 ^•O+L c 6a. S O m d C E a qad C E ° L Y tl Y Ly^ r g d b' O °� u ► T 0 w p _ V onw� w va .°. 0 c a i A a c N N . wy a y q d 4 ♦ ^wI I +qp..9 OwVN^w vo'tlt Z Lac CO o• � ° ^i1w alin�crn�a =`w ► y N .L. gieL �o °' CJ .O C m r r w p t� N +r G d` N y� U L d O y w� �► S ' N 90 � b�uN 'O �N£C£: •q =°TdgN L L C^ Wd^ yN �y`� >CCN `O Lewy A gg N°N t=l71 wL 9gau N.0 Ty 6U tlw �� NE _ 4 a= d► C► TN�y r NL Tqm Yo r1°rY WCtl ^O � w _ � N° a 11 y. °qq .-.P E�� 1C ° ►d y < n dd` uyi c NC � y ronr q °n u zN .- N o m f J C^ T q < J V N <, y O ^ a V t E g L owjW o ar°., <.L E° >c 5 .i 'W1 ^o �Uz,; w roc > tl c ► ► °'q4 V' 1 "c.t:l °. ut oL O.r°+ E� E.y' SyVI i °n d.. �.N. o. H no CZ* T° V w. 3 °1L <yy ► O N y� Wtl EEOTi wttd Egta ►} �o W �g udC C 9 — .— cp t b � 1 t ^ Vt G 6E0 ++« ai YT. �N C d V �' i`y� � V YL. 1°ri_ ► ` w C6 .yCL.9 • C � 6Lf q.^. L .y d�dN �y 0 �— d L ►y Nd L- qC 6m Sd. u� mfr GyE �..� °• 1dr L <L► Mro r a� M C h m M ^u. y q� d L a S Y C C S Z Q y �c T Y,�c^ ro^ � i NYC �6 V qEV y0 .<.dL. ►E° NuQ f rw —� `n a01L= rocL a► n E d.-e � � >�u. 1 Oml L d� d w W S CO °d Ac i�.l 01C N` �. G'►. `. ^a °elcn � �. LNC yro G O A A d L•O 6F 2 pdq E� Zn M t CL y > q = =7 6q�Y q "'V ^= S� 4 wy L tl A Y ♦Cd Ny .OE wYY. S C COI tlU'S a°..►.0 _ Q L L CA% lyit °.DO �,.W.O a ►C V ►rod ro° dY ►0°mgo;LNC C CEgOOa°+ 2Sg1° cr std CN` t; LNA ^� TO C tl d � LOLL. v^ Dm�N w4UC L.dy.N Ud Nw^ ='°1LA JwgN �� d N.CtltC °r � 9r <CL ►T �.<. aq° > d O L °6V <.y4 < yC E d L9 G O oiC C tl. N 9C. <c r r tdV d w^ qN G q ►M'y Y L� tC '<y CANE wl~N <O. E LV dE2Y o ygC Ly CU. N °r +n Yet. -.3 C 1+ C r Y L C b tl a O C. M:) L =ZEE ro 9 O O > q E =.t+.r �I 1 w 1= •. N 4 N m e r D.OA CO Q CC °1Y O OOq v♦dLy° r Olt C 'L9 Nn et' oaY °i 8�9 NILON ^s1 r•°- �° Y y a^ Ac x d ro A N.�ci era `cup `aL � JNq T� SAO �n cd Ny�a ^^ d Nd. ��• ca Y. N ^9�N ° c `nApO � •` .. ul NY1! •A''L p Q pn C �, NIV, c L CQy,r O N° d C ,L+ t: n Oao0 u c L V. - L r. � O N O.� L.°. L O^ V 02 Quo .2:; N d C1Y c L QN N 7 yU C Ea Y�. 6,St. � "^ pd c.1 YiLS r. y♦ � L �€ • CL NV c L M�.A N °1 �A YO C° ^pL d a Ud L J. d. 6 -pN 57 ad qt qu d ° Y. a jW W Y dIVO L W y G ill c° c y° �'YL 'N �C 6U6 sLr- M» aPA N'^Y. j ^JT C.L w A° 6 =C. YL Y CC 9 ^GOL T.e1pY« •{. ..E..� cvd _ y NiA N N N Ew� Q N Cm Q M �wJ 0 3 N f M 1 L CJ V 01 > R N N 6 O Q A S O P. Q U �dm ^L LL O c k-. av °u-O %°c a L a.UOw c Oi�6 ^La ie9i }N•" „G G.A OO L U U� o AA QO� dai Tj�n P d._ati« V ei crr9 rd Eu.. q o; �Na> ac q1 Q Ay F2 E G '^' q °mom a.i• N - L a« n4c y f Y KS .4 C NC A 9c Lr' Y d� AJ R?`qM Ya MMd` YL ^ C.O xgg6Yq u�1i♦^ ro Ao L N�yt Ot, a9 cE L9y� 6Tpr°- .°.ADM U LI�..,C� �'J NNww�i"1 hO�C Yyu.O d V.... 0 CV 7z- L Yom. Y. N O 4^ L «�. T dN °L > ♦ �.NM:^ Lp -+ °x uO° ° N. N Qa aA ^L..a �a L A u^^. o T ^u� t N.O t � ¢DwHn air p °m.. Q9 F='D �O 6rc Qv 6A WP pMN.a°+y°. `N 0 DO \l Z 4J U C) i Q ° HO OC u iii •= p ^ . H N L !� .tL Egos, L d Y D!nz AT ° C YZ tl d7 t3 . •` 6Y OLn Lp II a^ yt C LULU 2� O " DY YYY O: aQ OU�O+'u YL j Yy Ny i..rLL CC ^N G p.y N�i d �J`Upp yyo LL . EE n O Y• N l LOl H Y q ^ q �`dC ,v, p Y O y nqL _ Mi u.M . W f C5� C u z L . .. n C .A ° a a =A a °.y a E� l ,y%tl GA ..rdY V L= m� W G ,na It y a E O Np�. w O EYT.�6 i ,EU r gFOC q'd p 2u�H sgduN O °`YU C �N N G 6 N g M C 6 ^ P b ° 0=� W w A o a q G N a— C O d G p Y a tpY.^ -C HhNr Y.H L � O A. cL N`� W YC C�CI b ? ^7n N Q C dT 2u � LL GC J u GOffii. E Y C P` . A� « d H^ 6 6= Y � 0 0. > y AX s= � Y tl Y Z 'o w^ O 'Oq .O �a Ea > r �eV°s 1�4 2PllN6 A '' �L)WL `�R�t�N d..0 AV.� N 6ua m p•- `PaC°ce , cam. ��° mom;$ t o. -tl« $ ql{1 ..a 2-224 uO1q N p L .% L q V Y ` E Y. i n E A^ n S d q t z q L d W V q M W� Nr Z N p g6Vii LO� LVy ^^'DM L O�QT Yom,^ O N L M Y. pt Y.N O C> e G p p q M C r �^�, V 9! g N L y Y 0 ` q �^ Y t UL 1p ^ Y ..R �2-:! V C. Y .N ;s Y` p G. y` .NIL dpQ L . O . 2-s N as Y E�.uN y. Hv=u�ca �'uL N Nui .N.� w oH�. a is a v N y ~ NN LC N H ' Oq • N.NnyL .`. {1LG max. YC. l GEOd ^ dOY >N �HFV V A L a @ N O c. >� W M 2 C V N n i G Ln d N q d d 2 q~ .COO q E t P p ca+: a N p p{ m E ^ 9 0 N Y Yr � Z CC C d tl O N.«2.` 9.�r dNp AaaC a °`C.AC +ylE Od.G YL u. H.^ -...L tu. '`°y v p c ayp= T €Cti NOG BE `d o. � q c ^A c y p^ n °,e fr+t a^ occ a5E2ul a•�L a.o P, «tlgT wo _ 6 nN L yr L GL Q� 6 N�Vw N} C S�+L° JLE� 6 h `N� 66® OYM�. EyO. W.H2 6rd+ { I I a I { y WFVI O a Y -1 a OI s. bltiOV MVA /^� Y•r vN°ECEi ur oir'. i 4 0i n � e Y y Of � OI Ba �T i -'O y V�GVa$. A 4 RE�p{a a V '•n N V �u NL4 a4 p C e— Z :5 2 V C G LOT oll W^ yv 4pE L 'y°yZ NCL4 4a'rbi �W i 44N^ VO �-.. ar . u -c; "�°. VNY G4Oa lyr- COSH yN ` d CN .. � �uU g'O DSG 'o°a My uMOp 4,A 136 V C adL J.1V y. ` A 3e _Y ... - ddej py�p. Ny GS YQQ- 'Y C C F r E G i L EE py vl YO L M �N4 °a N blaHN 4° rr aVy C41 aV °4 Y Y9r`�ym ~ o. " �coa pN ,1 D• t ^ y O 4 W� a >tx y c L XO WNV r` 1^ V` "» Ou �� a +�.L C as GN t0 ypgVi YyV. r. O Y � 4 pO�W O O WyW OY " S! 6 9 r l d ° yy°•LU C U aLi N � V 1b tp 4 Z W J a Y -1 a OI s. bltiOV MVA ,1 Ba 4 RE�p{a a q u y,=c '•n uy a. n° i dra a4 e— yv _ NCL4 4a'rbi �.° v ^.. 4 vcT am pn> �-.. ar . u -c; "�°. .-Y Ot c ca. � gtr °arnu a.4 g no 9 t9 �� "O c vo- 6 NLaN �a °On. � 6y j� yi �L a O ^ >6 u 'w ^a..� `y °• Ot- LN } C 44 G'Z bl N ddej py�p. Ny GS YQQ- CYN VN� r y.°C�Vr 4,Nq L M gE ON O DY14 V' 2 a y V 4 �V u� yC GO VY VL! u - V' " V pN ,1 D• t ^ y O O C O N Y EppOE V NY94f.i: L 6Y > V N < TsY C XO WNV 1`XV Y O V Cam. �6 CVN 47 J.G2 r. ,1 a ,S6, Y Q x i-t W •O 0. Q� F O' OOp tJL Otf ? OCPa�S P a o ay.N. L N ai d i W L V a ^u R y O ILT'NN O o N�a4 = a NO YMN w yy dt: zOa ✓ _ r t d V A 4 L N ." i i .3 0 N r a[ j „NV A�Vw V d V < G 1 M h9 N <W Q Na G = l.;z aW p ° all E. E yore acwa 1^2d w ,<^ �.s. r='u: vl.�a cH v 6,4 o N N +,.�'> Ao. Y. G U C V �. it Y < is -1 N V., V' U Sy.41 _ A.y 3„.;„ 6N:J• N y.4 }V AgiC LLw WVF N CO1� ICY S S aAO. E.P y�'r „� W 4 N^ L r4 V C k '4 Or.V •p,41`J V. V RL V ^l. �,� t0.+✓ q Ndp N ga22 gC NN 4L w�Yt'O L�pN V.G �N wtY Lq C C� UNG r>o y Q ].y 4M C tKi.1 U LCr N6W S.° NLiO L`.♦01 4:.pnY Nor L 94 6rNUrw ^ >F. <Y 1.r wLV4 W.+Ni 4V r9 L'4 O ::11 1 tiq c L, u aN v aN`oo u y 1 p Y Y Y V d.r. U L.V d M N yl � r�tly V ~ °VG di V r C � a OC d� Y O< A^ < ° s y �^ L 4 fia AG dr %OprG'f O� � O v y K -9 L y d L Z G = 4,... M„E� M Z y.A. 4 p 1 P 4 W= 4 A N 6 C L L) Y `\ Or i[ C- n- rl a M `y4 � CU 6 w Y DLL � P a o ay.N. L N ai d ie L V a ^u R c o = a `Ye w tl r t d V A 4 L 1� L 0 N r a[ M + K V O l 6NG! V < G 1 M rl a 0701-02 0 9- -11 -85 P o C. Agenda Packet o 'Page-2 of 6 M u -- , � v p v n °so cY€ u� V V O C q N ^ N O ° N � V U n�a• xo u c" a Q1 Q'VO L a+ 09 V c a �Oa V C CQ R1C1a ►_ O �� V 4 ^O EE 6 d N� V y VC 4 N L O 4 a .e ►. 9 � � L m. _ v .n .'n u r " t .¢ mTFY w v N� ✓� p L1 r •b rnE% wp �a < ���. � N � .. r mr u �. a T• o c r y.. is L L � zz i a y°_ _ I mat F V aVl _ I-• b d..e. t p YQ .L y 44.. q d Q D 'n A p .:: O. L.a Vq 6' C y n. Ua U� 4q WsC� r p,0 N V P ► C� `ai ba V � � ° y S O V O V N 4 E L� C► y E W O so r A m M ell �u am m cr o 2W Y atY i Y► u. Lm ay. . ;: e� °aa H H ao.°. uL w+►- ai a> Y ^ 9 s r ^A Y.Y ytYi _ �dV pY Ri Eyd LZ ►O LO V Jag F'^ �4 Cw � 4 p NCGY p O� � � w^• r V TaCiL _ yyt1 �•. a °p l cw V�v ►o �v YY cy bVL ¢p vG Oep U9 EcE E. GIN Q n � W.6 4 6 1"•� b a' M u -- , � v p v n °so cY€ u� V V O C q N ^ N O ° N � V U n�a• xo u c" a Q1 Q'VO L a+ 09 V c a �Oa V C CQ R1C1a O 13 ►_ O �� V 4 ^O EE 6 d N� V y VC 4 N L O 4 a .e ►. 9 � � L m. _ v .n .'n u r " t .¢ mTFY e a A Nil ►A L Y p L1 r •b rnE% eL.r N.V ;4 Abp � w Y N y � C ►° V� °• r K Y- U O p E p p 4 4 Ty 4 �cC n'� E� yN sG »i d Q D L q ►-� VL pOVA C y LA t� W r V P ► C� `ai ba V � � ° y S O r A m M ell � �n F�9 - 4 ✓ V O L C L p 2W Y atY i Y► u. Lm ay. . ;: e� °aa H H ao.°. uL w+►- ai a> 9 s r ^A Y.Y ��, Tt� in �'S•.^I•rCo C6N 6N gin O LZ Li aY V l O 13 r' DATE: TO: FROM: 3Y: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT C!JCAM t, t 9n O *C6 10 i �I7 September 11, 1985 U 1377 Planning Commission Barrye R. Hanson, .Senior Civil Engineer Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9064 - CHURCH OF THE LATTER DAY SAINTS - A division of 4.24 acres of land into 3 parcels in the ToryC w Residential District (less than. 2 du /ac) located on the northwest corner of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue - APN 201 - 101 -27 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIC:;: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map. B. Purpose: Parcel No. 3 is the site for the development of a church on tom ght's agenda as C.U.P. 85 -02. C. Location: Northwest corner of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue. D. Parcel Size: Parcel No. 1 - .68 acres. Parcel No. 2 .68 acres, Parcel No. 3 - 2.88 acres. Total T.7, acree, E. Existing Zoning: Very Low (VL 2 du /ac) Development District. F. Existing Land Use: Vacant. G. Surrounding Land U'se: or - Existing Single Family. South -- Vacant. East - Existing Single Family. West - Existing Single Family. H. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: - Very Law L u ac. South - Very Low VL 2 du /ac. East - Very Low RL) 2 du /ac. West - Very Low (VL) 2 du /ac, i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT { Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 9064 September 11, 1985 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: This site slopes approximately 8% from north to south and is vacant. II. ANALYSIS: Parcel No, 3 of the Tentative Parcel Map is the site for the development of a church which is on tonight's agenda for approval as C.U.P. 85 -32. The developer has no irtmedi 2. ate plans for the development of Parcels land Off -site improvements consisting of the construction of comrrinity trails on Haven Avenue and Hillside Road and the installation of street lights and street trees will be completed prior to building fsrmit issuance for each parcel. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration.is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has ccaducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigatica.. Staff found na adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the pr +sed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attache reso ution conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 9064 and authorizing the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, BRH:BK:Jaa Attachments: Vicinity Map Tentative Parcel Map Resolution Recommended Conditions of Approval Initial Study , d i 0 D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENCSINEERING DIVISION D -3 PROJECT.-- PM X064 TITLE: _ VICINITY NIAP EXHIBIT;_ A TENTAME PARCEL MAP NO. 9064 OUTHE QTV OF RANQG 2N� KCOMS A sacs w G, "". wx IS. miconn Of IK CC-11 W S- lt-�O assaK culn" a Asmcolsmc G Q salt= 3 0=42 .5 i 0 ovCAn�o�c E VIRONMEATAL REVIEW w �n APPLICATION rJ � v > INITIAL STUDY PART I 1977 GENERAL For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have no si nificant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, ?2) Toe project wilt have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact. Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informatio:, concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: 29 January 1985 Project Title: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: Ronald rshi i 717 Brea Canyon Road #1 Walnut, CA 91789 (714) 594 -7779 Name, Address, Telephone of Person Trt,ae Contacted k Concerning 'his Project: r -a,ime { Location of ProjeCt2 Corner of Haven & Hillside North /West i Assessor's Parcel No.: 0201 - 101 -27 15001 List other permits necessary from local, regional; state and federal agencies and the ,.agency issuing such permits: Fire Department, Buildincx Department Enaineerina Department PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed project; Proposed one— story` church and small storage buildi_q. Remaining lots to be split off and sold. Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buiidings, if any: No existing building, proposed building is 14 740 sa ft. on 3.17 acre site Describe the environmental setting of the project site including information on topography, soil stability, plants (trees), land animals, any cultural historical or scrznic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): A vacant lot.. ctnriinry 2 a¢ from rr -+-th to South and S% -from t to WP_Ct. SevPYat loge cobbl�,`ex st, no t-re2z Ap very —le vegetation The urrnundin <r property to—the North West and across Haven exist single family 3etached homes To the South is vacant—Land.— Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a Whole have significant environmental impact_ No r e F P r� In U HILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _X _ 2. 'Create a substantial charge in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? S. Remove any existing trees? Now many? 5. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially s hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives?, Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: 6 W.C. + 2 urinals--- min cPnarXLa S. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: 20 to 50� per day & 100 to 150 on Sunday. No trucks 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards 12.000 cu 12.000 fill 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. NO CERTIFICATIOH I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to i:,e yest of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further u. o-,-stand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. I Date-,— Signature Title i -3 { s RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCT12N The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are ,equired to secure. Letters from the sI.hool district for accommodating he increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. g Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No,.: - Specific Location of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units 2. Number of multiple family units: k 3. Date proposed to begin construction: k 4. Earliest date of occupancy: i Model and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Rp.nge In RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9064 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9064), LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND HAVEN AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9064, submitted by The Church of Latter Day Saints and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the northwest corner of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue, being a division of a portion of ".he south 1/2 of Lot 10 of Scholwalters Subdivision as recorded in Book 19 of Maps, Page 75, Records o. San Bernardino County; and WHEREAS, on June 21, 1985, a formal appli'zation was submitted requesting review of the above- described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on September 11, 1985, the Planning Commission held a duly .,vertised public hearing for the above - described map. j FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION t:bOLVEU AS L J r -u SECTION 1 That the following Findings have been mace: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the in.arovement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdi- vision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environments impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on September 11, 1985. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map. No. 9064 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, Y 5. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: _ ennis L. out, airman ATTEST: -- Jack Lam, Secretary I, Jack lam, Secretary 'of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduces, passed, and adoptad by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of September, 1985, by the following vote -te -wit; AYES: COMMISSIONNS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: L] Im D _ D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. LOCATION: Northwest Corner of Hillside Rd. & Haven Ave. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of the south 1/2 of Lot 10 of Scholwalters Subdivision as recorded in Book 19 of Maps, Page 75 records of San eri+ar ino County TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO: 9064 DATE FILED: June 21, 1985 _ NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 CROSS ACREAGE: 4.24 _ ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 201- 101 -27 DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER;SURVEYOR Church of Latter Day Saints SAME Derbish &Guerra & Assoc. C/O Ron Ishii Brea canyon KROEOd 124 E. "F" St., Suite 12 Walnut, CA 91789 Ontario, CA 91764 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga i.— I'lude, but may pot be limited- to, the following: A. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X c. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the '!owing streets: 9 additional feet on Hillside Road* �—additional feet on Haven Avenue* additional feet on Provides -for a 20 foot Communi *.y Trail l easement. X 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4, All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and Joint maintenance of a l common roads, drives or parking areas shall b& Provided 'by C.C. &R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with. the map -. 1� k X 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements, 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City whf.'e sidewalks meander through private property. B. Sure X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of t;,e City Enginm and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to building permit issuance for individual parcels. 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recor.�ing of the map for the following: 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building aril Safety Divison prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit Tdr C. Street Improvements Pursuant to t e 'Miity of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16 36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.r, pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets.. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constru :tRd for all half- section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to building permit issuance for individual parcels, Cur A.C. t e- Drive trees Street A.C. Median Street Name Gutter Pvmt Walk Appr. Trees Lights Overlay Island* Other Hillside X X X Haven _- X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation an meter * *Community Traii -2- e ij El X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees,,--hall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X_ 5. Street improvement plans shall be preoared by a Registered Civil. Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public a utilities as necessary. 7. Existing lines o° 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X B. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. X 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. D. Drainage and Fiood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be -made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage -study for.the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A. drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be - constructed to detain increased runoff �3- L -►3 N E. Grading X I. Grading of the subject property.shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Coda, City .Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building per;nt, 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer = or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading p!an check. 4. The final grading plan shall be suhjert to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. _ F.. General Requirements and Apprc;vais t' X 1. Permits from other agencies wiil be required as follows: CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control--gistrict X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) a . Other k 2. A copy of the Covenants, conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordatiorr of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer 'and Water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga .County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is. required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino G,-unty Flood Control District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured. from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may re received from them. j � I -4- X 7. The ,filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guaran-L',e that sewer treatment capacity will be available at - the time building ,permits are requested. When building perinits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. X B. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailep trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by -the City Planner { Prior to building permit issuance for individual parcels. 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 27-1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map suogiittal, the following shall- be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. G. SPECIAL CONDITIONS X 1. Slope easements on Parcel 2 for the benefit of Parcel 3 shall be reserved or delineated on the final map. _1A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA it till Z VY xuuNt. -nv 1_;uL)Aivtvriva MEMORANDUM s. P6 C x �a 1977 DATE: September 11, 1985 TO: Chair,,. 1 Members of the Planning Commission FROM: -lack Lam, AICP, Community Development Direct BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 12642 K & B - A residential subdivision of 470 lots on 115 acres of land, which is part of Caryn Planned Community, located betwe•�n the extensicn of Banyan. Avenue and Highland Avenue on the north and south, and between the extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on the east and west - APN 225- 141 -08, 12 -19, 21 -28 The. Commission will review 'proposed modifications to the previously approved single family project, including dwelling unit sizes and elevations.` +, you will recall, this item was continued from she previous meeting to allow the applicant, Kaufman and Broad., an opportunity to evaluate concerns regarding roofing material and unit mix. Specifically, the Commission required 100% tide roofing and a 10% limit on the two floor plans 900 square feet or less in size, with equal dis ribution of the remaining units (1,140 to 1,680 square feet). Staff has discussed the issues with Kaufman and Broad, and a desire to cooperate with the ,City has been expressed. Althaugh no written, response has been prepared at this time, the applicant would like to make anrral presentation at the public hearing in order to resolve the '•sues i a timely manner. A copy of the August 28, 1985, Staff Report is attached for your information. JL: CJ: cv ITEM E -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 28, 1985 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 12642 - K & B - A residential subdivision of 0 ots on 115 acres of and, which is part of Caryn Planned Community, located between the extension of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the no,,th and south, and between the extension of Rochester and "lliken Avenues on the east and west APN 225- 141 -08, 12 -19, 21 -28. The Commission will review proposed . modifications to the previously approved single family project, including dwelling unit sizes and elevations. I. ABSTRACT: The builder of this pv<.�,� ;ect is requesting modifications to previously approved singie family homes; their plans, sizes and elevations. The Commi5�ion will determine whether the vevisions are appropriate. II. BACKGROUND: 0, January 9, 1985, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved Tentative Tract 12642, a residential subdivision of 470•lots on 115 acres of land, located east of Milliken Avenue, north of Highland Avenue. The tentative tract represents Phase I, or the first half, of the 227 acre Caryn Planned Community., At the same time, the Commission also reviewed the development plan for the Caryn Planned Community and a development agreement between the City and the builders. As part of its review, the Commission considered and approved single family dwellings proposed to be constructed in Phase I by both Marlborough and Kaufman and Broad. Because of marketing and design refinement considerations, Kaufman and Broad is now requesting revisions in their package of seven basic home plans. According to the builder, their objective is to widen the spread between the largest and smallest homes, so as not to present too narrow a spectrum of house sizes within the same community. The purpose of the Co;mnission's review is to determine Whether the revised proposal is in substantial compliance with the original Commission approvals and the Planned Community Text. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Phase I of the Caryn Planned Community, Tract 2E 2, contains 470 residential lots. Of these, 235 are to be developed by Kaufman and Broad, the remaining 235 lots by Marlborough Development. The units under discussion involve K & 8 homes only (Exhibit "All). The revised plans are attached as Exhibits "B"-"H". Colored illustrations of both the approved and revised models will be available at the meeting. The following is a summary of the proposed modifications: S — ;k ITEM H PLANNING UNNISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12642 August 28, 1985 Page 2 FOOTAGE DESCRIPTION PLAN SQUARE APPROVED PLANS: 35D 954 1 Story r 2 Bedrooms, 2 B�"- 35G 1,090- 1 Story 3 Bedi ooms, 2 Baths 35F 1,245 2 Story 3 Bedrooms, 2 1/2 Baths 40F 1,434 2 Story 3 Bedrooms, 2 1/2 Baths Boo 1,235 1 Story 3 Bedrooms, 2 Baths 50E 1,335 1 Story 4 Bedrooms, 2 Baths 5OF 1,590 2 Story 4 Bedrooms, Loft, 2 1/2 Baths Overall Avg. 1,269 sq. ft. P: PROPOSED P.EVISIONS: ' 35G 830 1 Story 2 Bedrooms, 1 Bath 35H 900 1 Story f3 Bedrooms, 1 Bath I- 351 1,140 1 Story 4 Bedrooms, 2 Baths 35F2 1,477 2 Story 3 Bedrooms, Loft, 2 1/2 Baths 50D2 1,310 1 Story 3 Bedrooms, 2 Baths o 5OE2 1,900 1 Story 4 Bedrooms, 2 Baths 50F2 1,680 1;; 2 Story <. 4 Bedr _. y Loft, 2 Baths i Overall Avg. 1,247 sq. ft. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12642 August 28, 1985 `. Page 3 ,r The ,iior differences between the approved and revised plans lie in the ezj�anded spectrum of sizes; rev;rsed pions call for units that are both smaller and larger than the original approval. Assuming an even distribution of the dwelf,ings 32 to 35 of each floor plan), the proposed plans average 1.,247 square feet, compared to the original 1,269 square feet p..r dwelling. However; noting the City's concern relative to the smallest dweilinrs, the developer is willing to limit the 830 square foot model to no more than 28 homes of the 235. The approved Csryn Planned Community Text and the Development Agreement permits minimum home size of 750 square feet. This is a result of approvals of the Development Plan by the-County of San Bernardino prior to the area's annexation to the City.. In terms of architectural design, revised plans and elevations submitted by the developer appear substantially similar to those' previously reviewed. The only significant difference appears to be in the elimination of one 2- story unit with the roofing and its replacement by a 1- stony unit with composhingle roofing. I'J. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Commission review the reviser puns and elevations and determine whether the revisions are in subst tial compliance with previous approvals.. If so, no further is If direction is Actfbn necessary.. not, specific re est? 7 Res ectf '1 s'bmit e , Otto Krout 1 Senior P nner OK:ns I �} i_•� it _ ' a : t >� � ~ _._,— °c ✓Ywu »s �o u.: no ys_.im a�v� E+o �vs lsv3 ti ..,..._ ,. j� IW p t ,A-0h � i! •t $ ! � �. � (! IlAk act- ' €' A•° � — n ll-- R. • � e y ?l� ra Cam• i� i ..� -+A •. _ ;' _ '. ,. ? � � �<5 rw%a%. a"`-. - �`?. i a"2 •��edi ` _ ® �!ly 'I , p ! r�i � �•• .�� �r lye Q �. V u1 �" �� �• t c- (. t Z, � i i� ��i , 'aJ.'d�' •�,t� � f y �1 ;1e pp a R, _ .•. .� 4.1 .,ij a,i Ci �J \. � 1� � :c _ : u � iq ` �`J.. •p,Fi� Y(i�'Ite i J •IW� ;t � II .? yf• r-�9. � e y •.• cr�rf � �} _ ® 8 0• ,� :� � — � _tit= . —� Fit r�.� ..� 3'� � �,� nl,• �;vvw.�nr• .11747771w 3� _ [a,�r� 1�• ,. '�o �� '' wssv.Nwr iarr� svlrlvsl E -s �I ►s till, 1 CIA SS 1 y � 1 w LM �� i a•, t�`��'', \rN \31�{ ;� III t� `_'i � +If I ��, q a r c w v v w C) 5 D ��MOt�o��na a�tv�+zs � :• � � . i R 0 M e th to n O A w 2 Q J a j =0 In 10 FAI ` 'WesoAvon"D oHMN` 'd gg 1 i ILI ILI —IU avvei9 V NvWdnvA I i ili H in O a J ' ' l 1 V C � ,T a0NNW f.5 z i 2 0 p a :y1 � IVOwa�n� aty�N�xs +� �° L adoae v N�arw�nv� � 1� 2 0 h u d n I t E \O a Z 4 e LL M C Z < a Q p� 0 u c Z 0 a • [7 si �uu l al • �1w�,� W w I 'ffl; W'.}C LvA( M H! \ 1 -1 d O to 0 a J CL %vet.owvon) ch=N`a2t , 4 1,11 al • �1w�,� W w I 'ffl; W'.}C LvA( M H! \ 1 -1 d O to 0 a J CL 0 _ 0 d 4 a LL! I Aft in .-% a 2 a IT air° e r l I S n r 9 4 n Kt'AmanandBroa, .outhern California. Inc. . r-ut ':: amret7pWL•valtl, +i. - 4ncves t;a -tum;a 90025.7748 - Kaufman B Brow ok��c• �s August 15. 198��i GC�sOO`SOQa Mr. Otto Kroutil .iQ OF Senior Planner ✓t°S' CITY OF RA14CHO CUCAMONGA Planning Department 9320 Baseline Road Suite C P.O. Box 307 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Kroutil: This letter will summarize the material we discussed at our meeting on AugLat 8, 1985 concerning the homes proposed to be built by Kaufman and Broad within the first phase of the Vintage Highlands Community in Rancho Cucamonga (Master Tract Number 12642) and set forth Kaufman and Broad's current proposal in that regard. This planned community was annexed into the city of Rancho Cucamonga subject to a development plan (PUD 83 -0044 W113 -61) and a development agreement between Caryn Development Company, Kaufman and Broad Land Company, Marlborough Developm at: Company, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. At the tine of annexation, elevations for a total of seven different homes were shown to the Planning Com-lission, solely for informational *urposes, as representing our thinking, regarding the product we would build within this community. A summary of these homes is as follows: Plan Square Footer Description 35D 954 1 story 2 Bedrooms, 2 Baths 35G, 1090 1 Story 3 Bedrooms,-2 Baths 35F 1245 2 Story 3 Bedrooms, 2'h Baths OF 1434 2 Story 3 Bedrooms, 2h Baths R 50D 1235 1 Story 3 Bedrooms, 2 Baths I Mr. Otto Rroutil August 15, 3985 Page Two Plan Square Footage Description 50E 1335 1 Story 4 Bedrooms, 2 Baths 50F 1590 2 Story 4 Bedrooms, Loft, 21z Baths The numE ical portion of the plan design; represents the house width -- accordingly, the "35" series would be built on lots which are 45 feet wide and the others on lots being 60 feet wide. Assuming an even distribution of product type within each of the two lot s-'zes, the average size for 45 foot wide lots is 1096 square feet and for 60 foot wide lots _a 3398 square feet. As part of our usual design refinement process, we revised certain of these plans in small respects to better serve our market. Among our objectives was to widen the spread between our largest and smallest homes, so as not to present too narrow a spectrum of house sizes within the same community. This new product spectrum was discussed w.th Mr. Rick Gomez, City Planner, on two occasions, once in April, 1985 and again in May, 1985. This latter meeting reflected changes to the spectrum which were requested by Mr. Gomez, which included the addition of a larger, two story home to our program for the 45 foot wide lots. A summary of this revised spectrum is as follows: Plan Square Footage Descripticn` 35G 830 1 Story 2 Bedrooms, I Bath 35H 900 1 Story 3 Bedrooms, 1 Bath 351 1140 1 Stcry 4 Bedrooms, 2 Baths 35F2 1477 2 Story 3 Bedrooms, Loft, 231 Baths 50n2 1310 l' Story Bedrooms, 2 Baths L 50E2 1390 1 Story 4 Bedrooms, 2 Baths 50F2 1680 2 Stoi,, ' 4 Bedrooms, Loft, 2 Baths J a° Mr. Otto Rroutii August 15, 1985 rage Three Again assuming an even distribution of product type within each of the two lot sizes, the average size for 45 foot wide lots is 1086 square feet and Zor 6U foot wide lots is 1460 square feet. At the conclusion of our final meeting with Mr. Gomez, we were told that this product spectrum was substantially similar to that which the Planning Commission had seen and, as such, no further Commission action would be required. We were told simply to file our plans with the Building Department and that approval by the Planning Department would be forthcoming, Unfortunately, Mr. Gomez is no longer with the City of Rancho � Cucamonga and It is your view, which we respect, that these refinements should be presented to the Planning Commission. You`ielt that this was part'cularly the case becau.ae of recent positions raised as to minimum square footage requirements even though such requirements would nab: apply to this community under the developer agreement. However, and as we discussed, we are willing, in order to promptly and efficiently resolve this matter, to limit the number of 35D homes to be built within phase 1 of Vantage Highlands to 207. of the total number of 45 foot wide ;:ots`Xor 23 of a total of 138). Assuming a balanced mix of the other plans, this would result in an average - `` square footage within the community containing 45 foot lots of 1104. 1 The average size for homes on 60 foot wide lots would remain at .146 square feet (versos 1398 square feet as first presented). In this way, :assurance can use had that the widening of our product mix will not result in a reduction c`.` overall square footage. While, as 3'>u know, it is our view that this action is not formerly required, we are pleased to work with both the Planning Staff and the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in every way we can. As promised, I will be delivering to you next week both drawings and color presentation materials in connection with our appearance on this matter before the Planning Commission on August 28, 1985, I trust that the foregoing analysis and proposal will permit you to make your recommendations to the Planning Commission and simplify the prompt resolution of this matter. Please do not hesitate to call me should you require any additional information. Very truly yours, IKAUPMAN AND BROPIV SOUTHERN C 'CFO INC. rant , Scardina Pres ent Northwest Division i�JSllsr � _' cc: Clyde Lane - T. �o cUca>Lfo�cv CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, fAO er.,wJoq D. Mik_els U C arles.I. Buquet II Jeffrey King 1977 Richard M. Dahl Pamela j. Wright August 19, 1985 Mr. Frank J. Scardina, President Northwest Division Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. 11601 Wilshire Boulevard, 11th Floor Los Angeles, California 90025`=1748 Dear Mr. Seardina: In response to your letter of August 15, 1985, 1 would like to take this illMll opportunity to thank you for formally clarifying your proposal relative to the Vintage Highlands Project ( Tentative Tract 12642). Since your letter partially summarizes our August 8, 1985 meeting, I would like to expand on your summary. Our records indicate that your original proposal for the 35 -foot wide lots, as reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council', called for floor plans of 954, 1090, 1245, and 1434 square feet, with two 2- story models. Your building permit application for the same lots also identified four floor plans, but at 815, 900, 1135, and 1447 square feet, with one 2- story model. Mr. Gomez recalls discussing minor modifications in the design of the homes; however, he has no recollection of authorizing significant floor area reductions, or making a ,determination that the revised proposal is in substanti'ali compliance with the original approval. I would also like to correct your apparent impression that the Planning r Commission's review of your project was purely advisory. As required under the Development Agreement, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Tentative Tract Map, and 'approved your project on the basis of all the materials presented to the Commission, including plans and elevations of the proposed homes. As you know, the sizes of the homes were of particular concern to the Commission. Review by the Planning Commission of the revised proposal which includes substantially smaller homes is thdrefore necessary. Frank $cardina Subj; Tentative Tract 12642 August 19, 2485 Page 2 On a Positive note, I would like to express our apprc;ciation for your willingness to work with staff and the Planning ComW';sion in providing comprehensive information on the final refinement of slur proposal for all seven basic plans. It appears that review of all sue•, 'plans, which now vary from 830 to I680 square feet, as compared to the approved range of 954 -1590 square feet, will give the "Planning Commi' sici a better overall picture of your project. As mutually agreed,-.we. wtlt,'.present the revised' -PTAJs and elevations to the Plpnning Commission on ':.he 28th of this month. - Your assistance in providing floor plans, eleva,,ions, and a map :indicating your portion of the project as previously discussed will be helpful. We appreciate the opportunity' to workr;with you on this project, Hopefully, the result will be a development that both Kaufman and Broad and the City of Rancho Cucamoi,ga can be proud of. Meanwhile, if you need any assistance or if you ha ny quest'oas, please do not hesitate to call: Sin ereiy f� CgqMMUNI1i EpECOPME DEPARTMENT PLANNIN IV SIO, Otto Kroutil Senior Planne OK:ax!! CC:f Lauren 'Wasserman r ' is , U, AM F nTM%r ALA D A WVITM nTTI" A A/rAT Tn1A I. BACKGROUND: The Caryn Planned Community incorporates approximately 248 acres of land located between the extension of Rochester Avenue & Milliken Avenue to the east and west, and the extension of Banyan Avenue & Highland Avenue to the north and •south. The planned community has been subdivided into 933 total lots through the approval of two tentative tract maps earlier this year, i.e., TT 12642 and TT 12643. TT 12642 is tzing developed by Kaufman & Broad while Marlborough Development w?l! be the developer for TT 12643. Both companies have mutually enlisted the aid. of the Florian Martinez "ompany to prepare a comprehensive landscaping design for the Planned Community. A condition of approval of both tentative maps is the requirement for landscapinq of slope areas to a Develooment Code standards. p�anzing scneme. inese tracts are the tirst to oe using the City's enhanced slope plant?ng standards. ITEMS F & G wo it STAFF REPORT �G j C f r OI O ui� DATE: t977 September 11, 1;985 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commist.ion FROM: Jack Lam, Community Development Director BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO TENTATIVE TRACT 12642 - KAUFMAN & BROAD - A request to amend the conditions of approval . for Tentative Tract 12642 by modifying the landscaping standards for slope areas for a residential subdivision of 470 lots on 115 acres of land, which is part of a larger master planned community, located between the extension of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the north and south, and between the extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on ' the east and west - APN 225- 141 -08, 12 -19, 21 -28. AMENDMENT TO TENTATIVE TRACT 12643 - MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMEt'T - A request to amend the conditions of approval for Tentative Tract 12643 by modifying the landscaping standards for slope areas for a residential subdivision of 463 single family lots on 164 acres of land in the Caryn Planned Community (Phase II), located on the north side of Highland Avenue, south side of Banyan Avenue, west side of Rochester Avenue, east of Milliken Avenue - APN 225- 141 -08, 12 -16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 27 and 225 - 151 -3, 7, 11, V, I. BACKGROUND: The Caryn Planned Community incorporates approximately 248 acres of land located between the extension of Rochester Avenue & Milliken Avenue to the east and west, and the extension of Banyan Avenue & Highland Avenue to the north and •south. The planned community has been subdivided into 933 total lots through the approval of two tentative tract maps earlier this year, i.e., TT 12642 and TT 12643. TT 12642 is tzing developed by Kaufman & Broad while Marlborough Development w?l! be the developer for TT 12643. Both companies have mutually enlisted the aid. of the Florian Martinez "ompany to prepare a comprehensive landscaping design for the Planned Community. A condition of approval of both tentative maps is the requirement for landscapinq of slope areas to a Develooment Code standards. p�anzing scneme. inese tracts are the tirst to oe using the City's enhanced slope plant?ng standards. ITEMS F & G r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tracts 12642 & 12643 September 11, 1985 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS; The purpose of the Development Code slope planting rer.�� ment is twofold; (1) as an erosion control orietnod, and (2 as as a means to soften the impact of graded, engineered slopes to achieve a more natural, aesthetic appearance. The intent of the imposed standard is to regt:A re the planting of trees and shrubs as well as groundcover. Clusters of trees and shrubs when added to the -lnne- aids in the softening in the impact of the slope plane and enhances the perception of a more natural, free - flowing hillside. The Code requires one 15 gallon tree per each 150 square feet of slope area. In addition, where slope height exceeds 8 feet, one 5 gallon tree i� s also required per each 250 square feet of slope area. Both tracts have a significant amount of slopes greater than 8 feet in height. Florian Martinez has plotted three alternative hillside planting schemes prepared to differing standards (See Exhibits "G -i "). Alternative A - Slope planting per conditions of approval Exhibit "G" . Alternative B.- Slope planting at ine 15- gallon tree per 50 s� q. ft. and one 1- gallon shrub per 100 sq. ft. (Exhibit "H "). Alt ^rnatiye C - Slope planting at one 15- gallon tree per 250 sq. ft. and one 1- gallon shrub per 100 sq. ft. (Exhibit "I "). The actual number of trees and shrubs required by the imposed standards is illustrated by Alternative "A" (Exhibit "G "). Florian Martinez has indic,ited their preference to be Alternative C. However, staff is of the opinion that this alternative does not provide for an intensive enough standard to achieve the desired concept. The issue can be sim 1 defined as an aesthetic judgement of how many trees are desirable. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must determine that this Amendment is consistent with the intent of the original subdivision approval. ' The project, as amended, will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or uses or cause significant environmental impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to a property owrers within 300 feet of the project site. F ,Q D 7 a PLANNING CON41SSION STAFF REPORT Tentative T Acts 12642 & 12643 September tk`.1985 Page 3 V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review and consider the information and provide policy 'direction. R spectful'ly ubmitted, Jack Lam Community Development Director JL:BC :ns Attachr:ents: Letter from Florian Martinez dated August 23, 1985 Exhibit "A" - Location Map, Exhibit "B" - Land Use Plan Exhibit "C" - Master Conceptual Grading Exhibit "D" - Master Conceptual Lai--' =ping Exhibit "Ell Tentative Tract 12642 Exhibit "h" - Tentative Tract 12643 Exhibit "G" Alternative A Exhibit "H" -Alternative 6 Exhibit "I" - Alternative C Resolution No. 85 -06 Resolution No. 85 -77 FLORIAN MARTINEZ ASSOCIATES PLANNING, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • REGULATORY SER AM Wr cry ~�Fc� August 23! 1985 Mr. Bruce Cook ,1,94 oN City of Rancho :utamonga Planning Department ���,!VV P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear. Bruce, This letter is being written for use as a "Letter of Intent" to apply for a variance to the slope planting densit. requirement 1 on the Vintage Highlands project for Kaufman & Broad and Marlborough Development. This site is located on the northeast section of Milliken and Highland Roads. Uy understanding per our phone conversation is that this requirement will go to public hearing on September 11, 1985. . Please call Wayne Florian or myself at (714)731 -6011 if there are any questions or services we might address to help expedite a resolution to this situation Sincerely, FLORIAN MARTINEZ ASSOCIATES William on Associate WL /cd rf c_ y 13132 Newoort Ask -ue, Suite 110, Tustin, California 92680. (711) 731-:6011 JVJaynehl:Flonan,A.S., ,. Gilbert M Martirez. Jim 5tebbins .AS.LA,WiIGamELaymon DEER CANYON DAY CANYON COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO _ —• CITY OF RANCHO \F ••` CUCAMONGA /I; SPHERE OF INFLUENCE ' CITY OF RANCHO ' CHA_ F_ FI EY '� ! I• CUCAMONGA COLLEGE t BANYAN AVE. Z _ PROPOSED FOOTHILL FREEWAY i °ITe• �, o ®a® mm®® esseti® gi pL+lsr��lJ® HIGHLAND AVER VICTORIA .. 1�. PLANNED h 444 .. BASELINE AVE. COMMUNIT �'—' Y FOOTHILL BLVD. La p j • Q m w 2 w Y 1 Q 2 � O U .�. ' _ — _ O a ¢ — w � s o W (, SqN SERNARDINO I FREE AY I -10 4 EXHISIT 2 VICINITY MAP PROPERTIES AT MILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NORTH crfY OF imm: 71, 126-4 Z } lz6 3 P- AI'CHO CUCAI"JONGA TITLE: �► r-t, PLAINNINNG DIVISON EXfllBlT:= _SCALE= ,A I BANYAN IYE w J J EXHIBIT4 LAND USE PLAN PROPERTIES AT MILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1. .71 _ - w lu T. - i NORTH CITY OF, ITEM: RANCHO CUC"lo.�GA TITLE Sao 1.� � 'R A PLANNING DINTOON EXHIBIT "'�' -� SCALE= FUVURLjAwrAM AVtNV ' it r Id cr- { 1�i �`L ���'� ... ',:�at��": -✓' -`fit+— -- __ _+ P-0"O FOOTHILL RER-1 LEGEND 0 DIRECTION OF FLOW SLOPED AREAS EXHIBIT 19 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PROPERTIES AT MILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND SAN. BERNARDING COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 4NORTH CITY or' ITEtit= -lT's �Zlr�2 � i2G43 4# RANCHO CUCr NI "O.\ .. TITLE = M.�s�c� PLAINNING DIVISION EXHI"•IT --�� SCALE- C-1 - -7 LEGEND !7 ".+ LOOP ROADS: .,, I EUCALYPTUS NOTE. ALL LOCAL STREETS TO BE PLANTED WITH STREET TREES: ONE TREE/30 ONEAR FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. LANDSCAPE CONCEPT EXHIBIT 15 eLVw. FOR ADDITIONAL LOTS LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN PROPERTIES AT MILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAjxj0.XGA PLANNING DI`WON C y NORTH ITEM: 3 TITLE: 1 EXHIBIT. '-%D-V SCALE: F((- B SPIN ELOPE AREAS t ! =y�PARKWAY PINES, SYCAMORES HYOROSEEDMIX ®� BANYAN AVENUS : TRAIL GREEWBELTS PINES PINES MILLIKEN /ROCHESTER: PARK: AVENUES EUCALYF US PINES, SYCAMORES, TURF ".+ LOOP ROADS: .,, I EUCALYPTUS NOTE. ALL LOCAL STREETS TO BE PLANTED WITH STREET TREES: ONE TREE/30 ONEAR FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. LANDSCAPE CONCEPT EXHIBIT 15 eLVw. FOR ADDITIONAL LOTS LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN PROPERTIES AT MILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAjxj0.XGA PLANNING DI`WON C y NORTH ITEM: 3 TITLE: 1 EXHIBIT. '-%D-V SCALE: F((- B I F r a ALTERNATIVE LOT LAYOUT [WITH STATE, .l.O.i.fURGHASE 3 EXHIBIT 16 LANDSCAPE ILLUSTRATIVE PROPERTIES AT MILLIKEN AND HIGmLAND SAN. BERNARDINO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA +i V NORTH CI'Pj( (-)F ITEM: T''s 12104 R TC ® CUC AN'IOIINGA TITLE - PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT.- SCALE---- 9 ii II EA CITY OF ff ENI RANCHO CUCANIONGA PLA•NINNG DIVISION F/ G jj ry �1 ,j MMaHG 'IEGU[�n�R+CFS fi7]Mnav�Mne SrnO �]41TS'fJit ' NORTH CITY OIL ., RANCHO CUCAIMOL GA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISIaN EXHIBIT : ,, SCALE. -_, _ NORM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE PW4NI►NG DIVLSI N EXHIBIT- SCALE tJTdC��?_O uus i3[ ' sMeugs 29^ �fltrreLS 32. sxeuaq - — Iwp.t[� �� T CWN916N In.t TJt.lTt 1 I NORTH CITY Or ITEMM _ s IZ(e42 12 4 RANCHO CUCAjNjojxGA TrrLE: " PLANNING DIVISIQ:V EXHIBIT --- t U �y �! ^ Conditions of Appro,/_ .Tentative Tract 126q, Page 7 D. Minimum street side yard setback nf ten (l0) feet. O. 4 final grading plan shall be required. Said grading plan shall be submitted to the Grading on-site cur and fill slopes shall be n part of the unwnn1lx lot when within or between individual lots. V. Street trees shall be provided per phase as illustrated in the planned Community text and per approved. landscape plans. 10' Greenbelt improvements wholly within the tract shall be provided �r phase as illustrated in the Planned Community text, The first phase built adjacent to u greenbelt area shall be responsible for landscaping he entire width of the greenbelt area adjacent to the subject phase (i.e., phase s shall be reponsible for construction the entire width of the greenbelt planned for Lot ''G" to 500' south of "Spine Road"). ll. The applicant shall be responsible for constructing 3 I/2 acres of the 7 acre park prior to recordation of phase 6 of Tentative Tract 12643~ A landscape plan shall be approved prior to development of the park. ' Landscaping shown on plan shall either be improved or bonds posted for their completion. 12. Equestrian trail adjacent to Banyan Avenue shall be provided per phase and include6uo landscape plan. 13. Three (3) cnnia, of a Landscaping Plan shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. Said Landscape Plan shall include the following: A. ' The required slope surface of all slope hank, in five (x) vertical height and of 2;1 or greater slope landscaped f j =r"^."./ control as rv/.vxo: one 15-y=/wm or larger tree per each � 150 sq. ft. of / ` 1 in excess of eight (8) feet in vertical height and on greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften slope plane. Maintenance by a Landscape District be required by the Planning Commission on � Maintenance ' case-by- case basin for perimeter slopes. B. All incorporate _ setback, split block face, columns, or at;her such features to vist,,-al and physical relief along the wall face. ' C. ned shall be topped to thirty (an) feet, trimmed along the lower fifteen (15) feet, and cleared of all dead leaves and branches. »' ^ ' Ff�� —<�� ' Resolution No jg TT 12643 Caryn Page 4 7. A final grading plan shall be required, Said grading plan shall be Submitted to tse Grading Committee for review and approval. All on -site cut acid fill slopes shall he a part of the downhill lot when within or between individual lots. 8. Three (3) copies of a Landscaping Plan shall be submitted for Planning Commission review and approval. All slope batiks in excess of five (5) vertical height and of 2.1 or greater slope shall be landscaped for erosion control as follows: one 15- gallon or larger tree per each 150 sq. ft, of slope area, one gallon larger size shrub per each 100 -Z- ft. of sloe appropriate ground cover_ In ✓`AFC_ additon, slope in excess of eight (8) feet in vertical height and 'on greater slope shall also include one 5- gallon or larger tree per each 250 sq. ft, of slope area. Trees shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften slope plane. Maintenance by a Landscape Maintenance District may bfe required by the planning Commission on a case -by -case basis for perimeter slopes. 9. Any existing eucalyptus trees to be retained shall bs topped to thirty (30) feet, -trimmed along the lower fifteen (15) feet, and cleared of all dead leaves and branches. 10. Three (3) copies of an irrigation plan shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval when slope planting is required. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with an approved system of irrigation, designed to cover all orations of the slope. A permanent irrigation system installed by developer is required on all slopes with the exception of those less than 10' when within 501 distance of a hose bib. A functional test of the system may be required. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer unitl the transfer to individual ownership or until the maintenance is officially assumed by a. Landscape Maintenance District. All irrigation systems, where required, shlal be designed on an -indiividual lot basis unless commonly maintained in an approved manner. 11. A separate landscape and irrigation plan per City Standard for the parkway and/or median landscaping to be maintained by the City shall be required for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. �ESo�. rice. 85 -1`/ F_t6 -tom -01 Ll ki D [ t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 11, 1985 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, Community Development Director BY: John R. Meyer, As•,Iscant Planner SUBS. is CONDITONAL USE PERMIT 85 -13 SHAW - A pr)posal to locate a caretaker's trailer on a. Christmas Tree, Farm located on 22.8 acres of land on the south side of Base Line east of Rochester in a Utility Corridor - APN - 227 - 161 -33 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Conditional Use Permit. B. Purpose: To locate a trailer for a caretaker's quarter. C. Location: South side of Base Line, east of Rochester. 0. Parcel Size: 12.8 acres. E. Existing Zoning Utility Corridor. F. Existing Land Uses. Christmas Tree Farm. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - incents Garden Center; utility Corridor. South Vacant; Utility Corridor. East - Nigh Density Residential; vacant. West - Regional Related Commercial; vacant. H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Utility Corridor. North Utility Corridor. South - 'Utility Corridor. East - Hi h Densit Re 'd t' 1 West - Commercial. s� en is I. Site Characteristics : The subject site is relatively level and is partially planted with Pine trees. A trailer, shade cover, wood shed and metal storage shed are located in the front of the property. Multiple signs exist along the street frontage which have not received sign permits. ITEM H J; PLANNING COMMISSION`_tTAFF REPORT CUP 85 -13 - SHAW September 11, 1985 Page' 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Temporary ca,.,etaker quarters require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. This Christmas Tree Farm is primarily involved with the seasonal sales of Christmas trees; however, some (weekend) retailing for landscaping purposes does exist. The nevelopment Code does allow seasonal sales of Christmas trees for up to 30 days through the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit. j The Development Code inits only the wholesale of nursery Ij stock. Further, the applicant's lease prohibits on -site parking. Therefore, staff recommends retail sales be prohibited except as permitted on a seasonal basis by a Temporary Use Permit. B. Design/Technical Review Committee_ 'ihe Design Review Committee has recommended approval of the project with the following improvements which the applicant has agreed to: 1. Upgrade the trailer unit to a modular type unit .with decking and arbor treatment; and 2. Provide landscaping setback along Base Line Road consistu!nt with Victoria Planet � Community requirements. C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per CEQA requirements. However, this project lies within flood zone "Ai" (100 year flood), district as determined by FEMA. To mitigate this, the Engineering Division has required that the trailer pad be elevated and or a diversion wall or dike be coi strurted upstream. In addition, all materials including, the trailer must be secured to prevent floatation and possible damage downstream. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project has been determined to: A. Be in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located'. i B. Together with the conditibas applicable thereto, be non- detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or imprm Tents in the vicinity. C. Comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' CUP 85 -13 SHAW September 11, 1485 Page 3 IV'. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in 'fine fii -1Y Report newspaper, the, property posted, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all material and elements of this project. If after such considerai~ion the Commission can support tha Facts for Findings and Conditions`-�f Approval, adoption of the attached Resolution would be >appropriate, Respectfull submitted, ac Lam Community Development Director JL:JM:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Photographs Resolution of Approval with Conditons 1 j 4i tlf. t 1 Ys��Y � SS, r •{� C. / s cs+A may,, �� ♦ A. .� 1z 1k. _.. .. AS Nr� ilk z ?`♦ 6cti'ag 7„'1. `,S p r�� F '„ max,+` • y3,r`�' to $ Q �� . ��K` Q � 31 a.. •..e."+' �� C. _t•GZO1:�T" _� _ ��r., t � Kr�w..r as*f •1 .sr: -.i.0 nr:+Ctr.4' VMrK43i'1.4 - �"r„ •n ,� a —t , 4 xvGwtK ¢�tv+tu *9 AGA. rr.-tn i CIL . -Z&wb :f,L'_ _ 1 •. — "Zoo- .s.r P' e.. T) ., 4• YAr 1,= :w;l lGi12rY: u�OC1i .l•1'P,y} r�xt 7 Trey,.. sys•; A. • IA•[t11 Y' .W i • S � V NORTH CITY OF ITEM: It RANCHO C CALMUN A TITLE= PLANNING DIVOON EXHIBIT. SCALE, -- i ..r :` ro _ �. � * � r mss}? * v ; ..a � a � �� r �' ' 4 i',�1 r � .. � �' . �F... < r.; . .. *� ,a r •� . � 'a;'- s, �. r S�'" � !� _ a x-� ?� � 1 i���il+ ,..� rim a � at �t�r- ���` 4. �' , -, ,� • 4 1L lv. .>>a .a -.• � _ t y - 4• 1 - - �C?TT�� STOC.1� AN ID ST�rS��C �G 5AsEUr)e ~4.1 - pI,AN -tom �,�oC.IL ITENI1 TITLE 2d�70 -(=RA-PH S _ EXHIBIT; C SCALE, K -� 1 RESOLUTION 'NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APP11OVING CONDITICN• L USE PERMIT N& 85 -13 FOR SANTAS PRIDE CHRISTMAS TREE FARM LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE EAST OF ROCHESTER IN rNE UTILITY CORRIDOR' DISTRIGi WHEREAS, on the 16th day c'..' April', 1985, a complete ,application was filed by Robert Shaw for review of the abave- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th, day of September, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described project. I NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use i,, in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site *s located, 2. That the proposed use together wit` the con ,n- 3 applicable thereto, will not be detrimentE rr, he public - he;alth, safety, or welfare, or ; IL-Ily inSur,ous to properties or improvements In the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use camples with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 3: Th °} Caad tional Use Permit No. 85 -13 is approved subjact to the following cond PLANNING 1. The removal of all non - conforming structures, signs a:•id trailers within 30 days of this approval., 2. If the ,pplicant• a -sires to maintain a trailer, it shall be of modular design and ungraded with deck iT , arbors, trellises and landscaping w ?whin ,.ix �6� months of installation to the satisfa,ttion of "sty planner. Appr3va I of trailer lor'ation S'-° '` from southern California Edison;. The, aouract the Building and Safety Division 1propriate permits prior to instaliatlo IFa 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION , CUP 85 -13 - SHAW f' September 11, 1985 Page,; 7 1 I 3. Landscape and irrigation along Base Line per Victoria landscape standards shall be installed within six (5) months from approval d"-ate. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for "review and approval by the Planning Division within sixty ;50j days of this approval. 4. Tint retail sales of trees will 'n,st be allowed. Further, sales shz11 be limited to whulesaie of plants grown on -site. Sale of Pert lizers, tools, pots: and other nnn -plant ite;s is not permitted. Seasonal sales of Christmas trees wil;- be alle4ed with an approved Temporary Use Permit. 5. Faildre to comply with the conaitioas of apprroval will result -,in revocation of this Conditional, (Ise Permit. ` ENGt'.. ERING 1. `s'hat the trailer be protected from flooding by raising the hailers' pad and or constructing a diversion wall or dike up stream ?rior to installation.. A ?design for the flood, protection measure must be approved by the City Engineer. 2. All materials, including the trailer,.;to be stored on the ste shall be secured to prevent floatation and possible UJW -ago to downstream prciperty. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY ur SEPTEMBER, 1985. f PLANdING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN11GA i BY: Dennis L. Sto;!t, Chairman ATTEST: j Jack Lam, Setretz.y E il: PANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP v5 -`i3 - SHAW September It 985 Page 3 I, Jack Gam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the n -y of `rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing 'Resolution- was duly_ and rr regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga, at ,a regular meeting of the Planning Commissi6 held on the 11th day of September, 1985, by the following vote -to- wit;' AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS': ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSz I i r f� f , r r ; e W' O Z Y U a .O i a �q,: c40-Z d525Z u a AGE+ ,�. p`oa ° O. T N Y Y 4t nN V Lr O qrf q= ETd idN A E 4. O Y,nLY nVc. Rn� uY d,_u aL� u o MC9 YC °-c' L�« Y4 qp Yvr Y' A OA ASCy P ° p � t4 dCN "_E YY�°c Yu6d NL.. GC inn °Cy oN cY a�Ur•` q Ly =c uq.Vp 2.Lw. EE9..0 co'°a^c,°amo y�pC� O L6YC N EE a .t l EEG M i. 1°� q !O'.. Y 6 t �L n N9 yCN�yA � 4 N A C M 4 N u p q > C� .^ « ,., n 4 E C^ V. °• ° N �, y 21 GEEYa .umga 4CPa q.'goN L naa� y °d�.�os� " Y L,TC '.9 }.� `arr.. LOS 6Yi nai T� E °„•c Eqa� e@ s ,w"eaG En 5 O R L 4 pp C y e� c d e V q V N yY Y L E c N a y Y d orNira �° 4 E c�.N L O q P O A'• � p n +T+ y O Y5 77-21! C 6 +u SN.L N3.'.• r°GaN ¢ 85 6 N+N•d+i.x <OOm �t 6N Iz d m \3 x o cpjv(,j L t A g T � � �c • u � u D pon l\ 2 r.CO u �:Y r Y uY P> HEN2DLT C O C Y A °6 n R° Qa0 N rod rain. Y hi Yro� mp 4 N y40 C C L L Y A • ��� ` w a d a _ _ a S.qO py0 = uq c Y. aL•• N Q" i N v a "1r a°.t EEE cu >OR ti 6 Y V j Ln A.CC Okay 6c J•: 9 W n L Ar'AP da ny. L q •- ` r anu y q Ga CC'''''' � o c oo cwyu n c ° E Lzi N r�•a.2 D Q NS fA O�v: U9.'Ciy 4 Lam=\ r40 Ni u� \3 U s d qty cRy�d aY'•'u9�du� a dam° A E Y H 0 L O g 6 0.0 q 3 L uLSV!' � g r czaq -a. = t Y u q.[Ii oq� ao' A°dga'o c O q 9 0 N .cta eti rn^ b'a n.Ne�+Y fn m` a e so q� A cam am u • N E =YmG b ~1 ^t ~I u ^a.Av av �aaLdaa aY r O A • r E q L 3' •^a L. .-.d �Yy Mob U. ^ c^ uQCN.O s ^•Y.r.� ^A E ° ° .— w .r=- GU t ,g- -=,; E llw >y •aN YN L:<N 6Y c ( /pEdLy _, = r. 4d�cQ. a G N� qv.P v u rnS 3.0 u �ASd V^ ydL w T<Hy .+L V C O d d M Y'N <C� cub s cM,Z = Y y y >q aw ar nL,=R...�LCO HA gz a y�r q q pp 9 q o P r r>• H 0 O 9.51 Y S C O b NYN^.• rayty aY• q o t =u V-9 . °acY .� T o. off_ > �'•.� Lq c�u. -na d Lam.°. o�� E VY L qc A 6 m:1 Y.E •. sae• a� 6-.:MNU�°•H c ID� U Ww•=; as LLOO H66 C o G O `�sW u y L U C' O A • A O q < 4 �.� C lr tf . V p r Y a C H .. a AL d: ^•Y.r.� .r=- GU t ,g- -=,; LO' •aN YN L:<N 6Y c ( /pEdLy _, = r. 4d�cQ. qe1: it a Y}° �6H19 iLa nL,=R...�LCO HA gz a y.Y Y.5- r>• r,C E =� -Z J <qL end >a.++ NYN^.• rayty aY• q o t =u a.•u. -oi �.^�- mW 'up O'n •" �.O °o.E, d Lam.°. o�� L^ O. Y °Y sae• a� .+ �o �.a mac, u+ ...c T`v .'+°.cn: N O.._° <atv G LS <H 6� V • 09� ���... 6.>.�q ^iZ yY T0�,0" L >a.H .cC Lw qV� <c maw •`°`Or.O: z:; W <COY qn �S yy HNB Qom. LW�.O =. u L 6 g q N Jn < q O O •OS q 9° CYd LA - y.Nt'gy �2 >,YO� M1d. o4.. NL c 0a9pL jA N 0.60 L� y> V 1NN = l _YQ..H ..0 6 t C o= T c E y6Cq •°rC y.Ca E 0V '= O NN: aqa r O.+"'. !• yg L q d c L ^YM .O? E LAS a ri < 1�9. 0 H3 �u YQCi `�� -=dN 0 C c.O1HNON O CoF`•+ ?nnM r da O a. c c v 4 ^ p A 0 V qa 6M q 0 O �6G� d to LOfq l LYC ^ d ° AY6dO d dn<ayCi Qq 6L 6 HO. 1-L Npq Rte. 1.� :/1'NN Q V Jei�6d 9� 01.= - h�YNC A }�. 0=+10 •�a F. lrt Lk F.7,jff� s O z U •n i a UA dw• .Od O AL O1O y. T. CY 01Y C •U OO Ga°i C N!•N O Md0<1 •• 't Ad C'. L Y C S Ld Q9b ryY q y, rd • N d Y N� G apt N 9po dLi�L° .= O~9 :H I 9d ✓• a—°� 'q O > cY.n L YfI.0 I. ET _ a°E.:.uoN s o lo C 9 E O' m c'! Ft � •� E N C •' L Zd ^ 99 "+•� y q o� �d a C 6 Y 4 O1S� C� a N ° Y d Nom.✓ d L�N c is �dcL L C.. •r. a Y L � 9 q �a ya', ii uc.• 9 » m •utv WE �' .nc o. •.. 14 �aa ' ZZ OI V duI q: ^. N4 p 9 J N C N c9.n ro .orN c y O N F o. o•c c m o on dro y aq v WT O QN ° a m9Y.O .• � 4 O6 YO.u.gd Ol c i i d d FF.. L O N d p N a d d N a'✓ .° � Q... -• C N�� E'M «y gUed ^a O ✓Jp n d0 It W dY dd0.. yYL6q 0' ✓ LC 9. N.y Ga EE2 T .011 8 ndw T b� 11O 1 L O N tg ✓T N Et �di N d�ro q41G q 1. Ot CC M �M1 nqu_L Y •� N 0 0 d aL7 EE.F d ELY — YO d � SIE n r ov °i y da m=oi a� a =bb av csr a+. ae. II as u v Eu u y n¢n _ o w 0O E U y eE E r 0 IF So a a °E L o ° Z 0 0 nN AMk E y a�a�a qua E 09 z o\ > EV W E N U w .... G W bG pN O y u N^d O LLy N uN V UT ad U L N 9 p�0 LO Y rLUNi 1-. d..g C. OU q a�v EU� p Wat uqu0 • o ' L Tg g ms L U U. C d. EO O:UO a9A�0 pOw r q0 u qd6 �w L.Ey C SOY d {wm C...0 ^� 1 .. y w O p w r 2 C A G U fV emu. -dya q9 A L q yAN L� >- Nq >r q0 O C U< p O w r SwN U u U 4 qV a0 QU.L C Y q C .p.'.� Orb L1q � ua G C.p a iNp O O pbT EEnuE � d 9tnU�aN. ^ N O E yy9 �L� m p~N 4 u N tll Z. LL A6 a AU LGd G N u 6�1t^ N LN LOEq Cc q•I Ip� bI TI Cl w wa. r O N y f!. 1 La � y S L c uo un,� 9 c NV VO zc a� N L o d E- qa ..a nOL cOn yd E w EL CaLn L V� N�i y � A9 E n ay Y q^ O Oo O NN A L N G w q O q oa W CoP Y': A r 9TOy �O 1L,A i N Z .�_ OPj \ y 4 u ^O C q a> e1 r q t a " q a C p -.0 L gV p^ Eq yw_ L N 6y a Y C p y OLL,OT qq2 EV � uU �Oty Y qy 9 4�qr Gi" a EL Na y, yn0 L a= q N 9 Ny r2 wlu La � yaZi.0 � L uOG V d 6y�y Lwn V L u:> 6 V u q n jZ L L ALo d N y Np aq+. °w„o.i u E q c' Gaga+ wnc >N m Lw ++u N n p" O t"; �� e• O. O QnbT S E U N t L nN � G 0 -" q�AM E Y O r0 r m T e u 2 A d 4 yN p� Ew .% v u L •• d NNW d m'Q V L o u N W L d V -X-- C C O qp ^� A. r 0 M= C 9N 91 N O A Cb 6 L A UL -L EY• i u..ppE^pE d! YW L SS„C T Yd nC O y° O. Hq�q+ a - r OV..JO LO. Cp r WW WEZ d y 1 X00 9C.0 UAL N6Y U C A Y i�G�t q� Y^ 4 .O.v C.• BEd � u y �� ` y q G RN d @D L yti O N 9 > NL EE Y C •�` 9Nd iN Od >b Yq N T d G9 r. W ~ Y � 01C C0 «'� Y V C Y O W TN �M^ ? N p c. W �.� " i O +• L ,^ 6 O O d r Z z IOT I,g w= uT � a j..> 'i N g O O V b C ci d 6 E •O nW. p0 C E�"e Y« o �. o a o —.yea y°. ^_t• -. L ue i'�YE W qC� v as .• L EO G d %O � t aO •C. EE E d r ^ N dV? V Vo Y N p d Y- >G YdO�NZ CYy A q C N.E OUC .Y.l 2L NTrn C yv u�a • E Mw�'EOi Eq pn � 4�a`%� N LY QNV giaV — N a Tq a� Oq r. V U AOE �Ca q GQ �. a. NA VJ Y p•. u Y OOT Qt^ rn q. A Ol C �. • J y Z d C �a I F= c o'•' -1t o 9z ^ u u yyid V > > q OO ^W GW N liT 49. 0.46 6U:S . C t J u O O p^ �C C C h m q lam. N Ol Y L T M0 > G YI oo L a Y G — d 6 G yV q9 y d¢ C 42, a.uay i'a rnrn Ta- M� �,� bbbb SU I• � d MW. O�Vv �a dp qN c n olY c uzdp. Ta A « Wr C9 C u� ^d C Nd�'Oa .,o au WM u aim •°.9 M: rp,N aNpp r 'O �t �e ^ vq • due+c YL yE pr To q9 C.0 O 6e• Y0 Y. Wy Ny`W. = MV l iii fl 6� Y ` U d N � 4Yy LG. i NO GYEt O.' °mac— m °n C O. J g r 6 a0i V Y W r 0 O .• V 0— O p N �� R O O. 9L0 q� �� u Ofy dA L� Nu q�.. —>• 6 i`A O r GOA _ p6 E p rY. G 1y 9^q C 7d y C aW. � bOp] D•'H Uy j. N 9= IJ` NUCV iy LC GN 0.Y •'OC V O A 31 I Y. ZY Oa " r v i!p SF pyN W Lp yrd v c r u �q o N .ru AC Ot G M O N /.. 0 Q •'• A p 4U. ( Z V N 6 d 0> O T> O �Y i REF« q L 0 NC 'N `Y wq OY.Y N4 0.0 Oii w9 YtUCVIw. <WWO 6�E� W WYV mod: i9�G.2 6M 60 60tu ) -.O 4 A D V t F N [•f R N N 14 a=• u C^oy �fJ d i• �. o L oop V r pl • o� N Nov i VL.. L � � woaa� A L y O s� � W L N ^QL dW VSO O N Ca Aa O �wGr- O d u K n a s E �R , V 0.O yM as oc C C d x N3 L u vAiypEE ,pu �• TyY A � L Q ^� p L N T• �T V p, 0. � sd S� y ^ 2 H N 6 S .W,o _ Odd C^ 0.0L rr0 y C 72 t; YO 4YY 0.0.N rOlq Eu. 0.0 CA O...0 Ad l'�mL d N r CW 70 _w 3q �it`l4r ETg QJMF LLO. C� L..y Q0.. C G � v NLI •C ^L0. Av"O � AT Np rE a ^a L rbv 0.+•dL'� N L0.'. ci o3]CVy. ~NEE o � Y a rya. f.% �'¢•.O. r, a+L 0.r LN 6L GL dAG EC L 'p�GY^ Qua L 2 vdiEya � "L L Cy 4y 0.••m+ - . �� .O � E'at ti J mq.LU 4Y ^L dw A ^W d w0' ugoapioc N� Nr R. L ddi. O. L.0 d y.�i`� �f.]�O m OAy NU dO• _A N VC ^ AN N G LNrnd � d•=� N NLy' _a d i ��6�d W• L ONd �W E A �M Y^ v W Nq »y x N T d.r- L � 0. tu/16W q�� Q6va1 M Vi O+L+M ND 6W+L+ .-Y. RV d� WM ML LtI 26 V9 d Yp. a=• u °vNi oo v M d 61 L. Y Yom€, EO V C . ° ON �O• LW N D.IL L� 1 O s� ma �.t 9 AH. Fo�6 4u .- v= uE W q0 CmT�"" C Y N y O d u K n a s E � Z 40.yt E9 Cr p as oc c� ^, a qwi N3 O � u a .- Q... w �E M Ny6f ba � Q ^� d 9= q Fd 19 Y A ] Cp N y d -.2 C Mu O O 6A TQL W2 N 2.� O wK L+ Y . .LL LO`� .�i Y H N 1 -e-15 b rd y G P a V ¢ �L` W 0 v d L • °�i _r W G ^gg La C 1 O s� o J W a'o XU W 2 � w ?1J � Z 40.yt C as oc S qwi N3 r u a V da U � 1 � _Nt i tl� r V � W •SG� H N 1 -e-15 b rd y G P a V ¢ �L` 'v ti p I v d L • °�i _r W G ^gg La C o E p � Z 40.yt C m Y a s� S qwi q < r u a U � 1 � _Nt i 5 Ll SA ivA � v vs YV . {J 2,2 az C H L C„pa CYO ^< Z 9 Y yp L+ ia a n o'o' v °c .�.'> iY «'Y � ariM rq Ld L� � � lid ryY CL6 =14 �y aR i _t cu Is V u L N L L • y a� » 6 Y 7;.2 OY Alias nL Y� m-4 LWY 4 qd L d L« AFL az Via° 0 a f «� = � a a i F. o .- wN ai vv qo v i�ae u ° • �N A9 « i. O � N L �Y O LL o y L= q S L L v in`N �i M`Y Aon a�q $i v� Vo t N � U . r OJ at rC. n AC G O O 4a Ap EL W a C N G C G y 9 ° �. L A ^ W o. e YA YOY 9 Y E uVwX L? 'ggl.�. O OGG 6 t..1 Lt L V tiV .r hH4 Kvi4 (y �RC FN ZY QM 4w c2 f, �j DATE: TO: FROM: ay: SUBJECT: -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT O O F Z U > September 11, 1985 197 I Chairman and Members of the Planning CORRission. Il Jerk Lam, Community Development Director Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 11928 ALVATI - A residential subdivision and Design Review of 59 townhouse units on 5.85 acres -)f iand in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 Diu /ac) loceL"ed ea the north side of Highland Avenue, approximately 800 feet east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201 - 252 -32. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision, site plan, elevations and issuance of Negati,.e Declaration. B. Purpose: Construction of 59 townhouse units. C. Existing Land Use:, Vacant, one single family home C ?, Project Density: 10 du/ac. E. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Low Medium Residential District 4 -8 du /ac South - Proposed freeway, vacant, single family; Low Residential Distrir 2 -4 du /ac East Flood channel vacant; Low Residential District 2 -4 du /ac West - Vacant (TT 12914); Low 'Medium Residential District 4- 8 du /ac F. General Plan Designations: Project Site -- Medium Density Residential North - Low Medium Density Residential South - Low Density Residential East - Low Density Residential West - Low Medium Density Residential iTAM 1 i f j. i F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 11928 - Salvati September 11, 1985 Page 2 G. Site Characteristics: The site is currently developed with one singly family home and contains an abandoned water storage tank which dre to be removed. A 10 to 20 foot high W uff runs in an approximat: north /south direction through the property, and th- site has a slope of about 20 feet from the north to the Knuth. Vegetation consists of turf and several large trees.. The Alta Lovia Channel runs along the eastern property line. To the northern property line is a 45 foot wide easement owned by the Santa Fe Railroad. The easrment is riot used by the railroad. H. 1ROlicable Regulations: The Development Code permits multiple- family dwellings in the Medium Residential District, at ten dwellings units per acre under the basic development standard -. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Due t(- an oversight, the previously approved subdivistan. and Design ;;Tview for 59 townhouse units has expired. the develo__ � has resubmitted this same site plan and elevations for review and approval. The site plan consists of two -story townhouses clustered int.: two- plex, three -plex and four -plex. The unit '1ze proposed range from 1 „290 square feet to 1,600 square feet. Each unit has an xAtached two car garage. Eighteen guost parking spaces have been provided throughout the site. The recreation area is centrally located with greenway linkages throughout the site. Recreation amenities provide+ include recreation room, swimming pool, spa, deck are &,, tot lot, ar„ open recreation area, which is located toward the center of the project, Therefore, the site plan together with the building design, comply with the current Development Code in the areas of setback, density, neighborhood compatibility, and design standard,. Access to the development irovided via Highland Avenue with an emergercy access located at the southeast cornet- of the site, B. Design Revier Committee: The Design Review Committee has reviewed th¢ project and found that the overall site plan arrangement, style of arch itectur�z, open space areas and density comply with the intent of the absolute policies in the areas of transition ;_'. density, height, scale, architecture, and neighborhood character. The - Committee has recommended approval of the project provided that the following improvements be made which the developer agreed to 1. To create interest and variety, the two outside garage doors and the two inside garage doors should have different shades of color, materials and design. I *: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 11928 - Salvati September 11, 1985 Page 3 LP 2. The dev- N15per should work with Staff and the Flood Control District in exploring different designs for the flood control block wall to the east property boundary through different block materials, landscaping with vines, openings to block walls with landscaping, etc. 3. Thy proposed block wall along Highland Avenue should be of stucco material.. 4. Any proposed security gates should be reviewed by the Design Review Committee. 5. Provide special entrance statement on Highland Avenue. The developer has contacted the Flood Control District regarding the block wall along the eastern property boundary. The Flood Control District stated that the proposed design as suggested by Staff and the developer is not acceptable, beLause the purpose of this static block wall is for channeling excess water from the creek. Attached for your review is a copy of the letter from the Flood Control District. C. Technical Review Committee: The Techr.-T.'al Review Committee is concerned twit the 42F #`oot wide abannoned railroad property located north of the project site, Exhibit "D" shows the relationship of this strip of railroad easement to the site and the adjacent project. This strip of abandoned railroad easement could become a public nuisance by being a fire hazard due to weed grow-eh and a breeding ground for vermin. Staff recommends that the developer, in cooperation with the property owner to the north, acg5ire this railroad property and integrate it into the development of nne or the other project. This acquisition of is 4 should be accomplished Prior to the recordation of either tk..is TT 11928 or the northerly 'r proposed TT or issuance of any building permits, F wai(heve,,- cones first. The developer has in good faith 'in attempted to contact the railroad compaiv an effort to -' acgw're this railroad easement. Attached '.5r your review is a copy of the letter from tf° deweloper to the: railroad company. D. Grading. Committee: The Gradinq uommitte,, was concerned with ( the high spelt F the two block . ialls betvenn the project zod the adjacent one (Tentative Tract 12914) us shown in Exhibit RF". This grade differP,tce is unnecessary and could be reduced through cooperation from this developer and the adjacent developer (TT 129111) by installing one shared, common block ��31 0701-02 02 o 9 -11 -85 P, C. Agenda Packet a Page .3 of 6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 11928 - Salvati September 11, 1985 Page 4 wail. Further, to break up the impact of a continuous 14 foot high block wall on the side of this project site, a sloping, five foot planter should be provided, with a second five foot block wall, as shown in Exhibit "F ". E. Environmental Assessment: A Negative Declaration was issued by the City Council on May 19, 1982, with the previously approved tract., Based upon further review of this project, Staff has identified the following environmental impact: 1. Noise. The project site is impacted by highway noise from the future Foothill Freeway, which requires a noise study per the General Plan. The Noise Study proposed the following mitigation measures: a. A sound barrier consisting of 6. wall, a wall /berm combination shall be required along Highland Avenue. b. A final accoustical report to provide mitigation measures for interior noise reduction compf'ying with Title 25 Standards `(45 CNEL) shall be required. 2. Removal of Trees. The development of this rroject will cause the removal of 15 mature Eucalyptus 'Wees and 2 mature elm trees. Although this project requires the planting of 50 trees per gross acre, staff recommends that these trees should be preserved whenever possible or relocated to a suitable location' on site. A written report froo a qualified landscape architect or tree arborist shall verify the details of preservation or relocation. Any trees that cannot be transplanted shall be replaced in kind with mature specimens. The written report shall be submitted together with a Tree Removal Permit pursuaw'- to Ordinance 37 and a detailed plan showing existing trees and relocation /replacement. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent 'with the General, Plan and Development Code. The project with the added mitigation measures will not be detrimental to public health, safety, cause nuisance or significant adverse environmental impacts. ' In addition, the proposed use, building design, and site - plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval,' are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. 1 LA L1. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TentativE Tract 119 ?8 - Salvati September 1r, 1985 Page 5 r IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has: been adveAised in The Daily Report newspaper, public hearing notices were sent to all property o:, rs within 300 feet of the project site, and a four foot by eight foe•; public notification sign was posted at this site. On July 18, 1885, the developer conducted a neighborhood meeting in order to present the revised plans to the adjacent residents and to E =. receive input from them._ Four- families attended this meeting and the consensus among these attendees was that they have no objections to this proposed project. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider all material and input regarding this project. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration_, approval of Tentative -Tract 11928 through the adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions of Approval, would be in order. Re ectfully s bmitted, LkJack Lam Community Development Director JL:NF:cv Attachments: Summary of Neighborhood Meeting of July 8, 1985 Letter from Flood Control District Developers letter to the railroau cu-,apany for acquisition of railroad easement. Summary Development ment Table Exhibit "A" - Location and 'Iand Use Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilizat,on Map Exhibit "C" - Natural Features Map Exhibit "D" - Railroad Easement Map Exhibit "E" - Detailed Site and Conceptual Grading Plans Exhibit "F" - Details and Cross Sections Exhibit "G" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "H" Elevations (3) Exhibit "I" Floor Plans (2) Exhibit "J" - Tree Lpcation and Removal Plan Exhibit "K" - Photo of Trees Exhibit "L" - Noise Level Contours Initial Study Part II And Addendum Ask Resolution of Approval ' "with Conde'- ;:ions HIGHLAND VILLAS TRACT NO. 11928 MEMORANDUM RE: HOMEOWNERS. MEETING On July 18; 1985 at 6:45 p.m. the following individuals representing the owner /developer met with the homeowners group to discuss the proposed project. Dominic Salvati - Owner Thomas Davis - Architect Steve.Wheatly - Reap Estate - Broker ICen Ketner - Mortgage Banker Homeowners Group - Tod Curry, Joel Fahres, Kendall Scott and Peter Liu. The architectural plans for 59 townhouses was presented to the group for their review and an open discussion took place. We discussed the design, floor plans, layout, landscaping, and price range of the proposed townhouses. The homeownerz" major concern was the type.of townhouse being developed and the price range. After a full discussion and all questions weri nswered, the Ask homeowners group was satisfied and had no objections to the proposed project No. 11928. Dominic Salvati ez GrT�i F.- RA cNO wG/Ji�..o ..uv.p -- - /S'�CArs��ri -.v T,P.!'dT sv1o. ✓/ Sd'z�' - . �-C Cct.c,-1 be -rcf' e...- JUL am 1L n 1 �i7ia I - - G Y6 9 c��•- s�rupGE 1 �'"/� BE PARTMEN k OF TRANS RTATION COUNTY Of SAN BERNARDIP0 FLENVYRONMENTAL I�C�® CON�i ROL {A ;R►PORTS,'' t— y„ , ; NIXICWORKS AGENCY 825 East Third Street - San Bernardino, CA 92415 -0835 (7141381166S MICHAEL G. WALKER ' Director . Aust 30, 1985 File: 1- 40511,00 T.T. 11928 — RECEIVE® -- CI1Y Of RANCHO CUCWONGA , PLANNINQ DSViSiGN Sanderson & Assocaites, Inc. AUG 3 01985 9587 Arrow Route, Suite H _ Rancho Raneha Cur.amonga, CA 91730' M (91�1`111121112131415F6 � Attention: Mr. Gary Sanderson He: Zons 1, Alta Loma Channel Tentative Tract 11928 Gentlemen: By your letter dated August 16, 1985, this Clfice was asked for comments regarding the City of Rancho Cucamonga's July 18, 1985 Design Review Committee's Condition #2. This condition was in regards to the structural.. block wall along the east and northerly boundary of the site. Our comments are as follows: 1. As you and the City are aware, the wall is designed to preclude possible overflow from the Alta Loma Channel and Basin #1 from entering the site. Therefore there shall not be any openings in the wall. Any openings in the wall would allow overflow to enter the site. 2. Any form of vegetation or vine will not be allowed on the east side of the wall. The District does not want to assume maintenance responsibility for landscaping within District rights —of —way. Also since the access road area will actually be part of the channel and concrete lined between the existing channel and wall, nothing can be planted on the east side of the wall. 3• If some form of decorative block is used, it should be able to resist abrasion from storm and debris flows as-well as the normal cement block. The structural integrisy of the wall shall also not be lessoned. 4. The use of decorative wrought iron, or other form of decoration on top of the wall Will be acceptable. In order to preclude trespass from the site, the wall should be a solid barrier, 6 foot. high. EAGZ; g . Letter to Sanderson & Associates, Inc. August 30, 1385 AfthL r Page Z , Your letter also submitted 4 sheets 2 of 2 of the improvement plans for permit review. Sheet 1 of 2 should also be included. 'Me filing fee for this 'type of permit is $200.00. Both sheets of the plans with the filing fee should be re- submitted to the District's permit Section, attention Mr. James L. Dunn, Permit c'•n ineer, 825 B. Z.ird Street, Room 102, San Bernardino, CA 42415 - 0835. The plans presently meet the District's recommendations. Should you have any further- questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact the undersigned at (714) 383 -2388. . Very truly yours, ALLA KHOLD Chief g; Water Rescidrees Division AJK:RWC :mjs cc: Lloyd Hubbs Ken Miller Bill Collins k -9 �:zt_. 1 29 August 1985 Dominic Salvati P. O. Box 392 Cucamonga, CA 91730 (714) 987 -2511 Mr. W. T. Bentley — RECEIVED— Manager of Real Estate and Contracts �rN OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA Santa Fe Railway Company PLANNING DIVISION One Santa Fe Plaza AUG 211 1985 5200 East Sheila Street AM P Los Angeles, California 90040t$Ig:�1u��2t3s��5i6 Dear Mr. Bentleys In regard to a proposed tentative map, that I am applying -for, . the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department has requested that I inquire to the possibility of acquiring approximately 0.425 of an acre of Railway abandoned land located adjacent to a portion of Lot l4 of the.Footh;,ll Frostless Fruit Company Subdivisa-.,n. Enclosed herewith is a copy of the legal description Aft and mapa of said property. If a reasonable price with terms and conditions can be agreed upon, I would be interested in acquiring the abandoned. land. Please let me know your position regarding this inquiry as soon as possible. Very truly yours, Dominic Salvati DS:lcm Enclosure cc: Ms. Nancy Fong City of Rancho Cucamonga r Planning Department Alk- SCHEDULE A DESCRIPTION The West one -half of the East 421 feet of Lot 14, FOOTHILL FROSTLESS FRUIT COMPANY`S SUBDIVISON NO. 2, in the County of San Bernardino. State of California, as per prat recorded in Rook 20 of 'Maps, page 34, records of said County. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the 22 foot right of way for Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, as shown on said Map. ALSO LXCEPT the interest in the South 3 feet thereof, as conveyed to the County of San Bernardino by deed recorded September 20, 1961, in ' Book 5540, page 418, Official'Records. r E i k G t m G N a z 1E) _j W F-q 3 CF- thomof loo dca&vlf offociatef For Foothill Frostless Fruit t °,o Sub. No, 2 h,.a.zoi34 - D� .la w v a Z O6AC. S M1L �J 1 E i Y S.!! AC d 1 �' - • 2! l {948.2 109 AC. MA %I 4O w �. 4.07AC MA ®AC 0 .f ®f is 6 i! of ♦. •a ® Por. Par.3 c �_ ti O 1062 ®4.SAC 9 -,. . WAAC.. d �� i p s ^ Par l Per.4 • i�a I �J� 4 ss ® a. , p 1r�r roe _. LEMON a ` 34 x ®• ae 1.4AC. a i. AC. : �rO L"Jt�' 9AG1 6 Y tPor.3 Pac4 It 6 I • 1ASAt 1 4 / 5 ., 0� 9 ,►M, 5.i6Ar -@hL ! , o ref /IO 'P tips. f! are t► �� • HIGHLAND- ._,..,_. i is i ~� W77 (ART it - UNIFORM APPLICATION• RE81DENTIAL PROJECT SUMMARY N- VELOPMENT TAB Project Name : Highland Villas Reference Filu No.: Location 9862 Highland Avneue, Alta Loma 'Staff Use Only) General Plan Residential Viedi um Development District: R110 -T PROJECT AREA Gross (!ncl. area to centerline of abutting streets): 6.18 acres Net(exclusive of dedication for major eKternal and secondary sheets)- 5.85 acres (254,999.7 S.F. NET) DWELLING UNITS (Based on Net Area) NUMBER � NET DENSITY Single Family Detached 0 10 /DU /AC Single Family Attached/Townhoure /Duplex 59 Condominium 0 Apartments 0_ Total 59 AREA DISTRIBUTION (Based on Net Alas) ACRES /SO. M% % OF NET AREA Building Coverage 48,300 ... ................19% Landscape Coverage 155,699 ..................... 61% Vehicular Area (incl. parking) 51,000 ..................... 20% Common Open Space 142,129 .............. . . .55% Private Open Space 13,570 ..................... 5 %. Useable Open Space (common & private) 155,699 .... . .......... .....61 %. PARKING LIST OF AMENITIES #t Of Spaces Uncovered 33 Pool Carports 0 Tot Lot Garages 118 Spa Guest Parking 31 Recreation Vehicles 2 Total: 151 Ratio (Space /Unit): 2.5 a "vi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNUNU DIVISION I NORTH rrE,M-. IT 1-15 VR 3 ��. �� ./ t` ...,,tit3- �- �'.1�•p ern'. � � � f •a •x r f.: 31 11 TE VII lif .,,,,,1 ...-c `t� !y i% 1.,- y,����y� .. P' y � x a.,� � �"j, r � � �� {cy; •' � 1��.,ly �--�' Y y��*,� �' .1�. � i � 1 a' a sr • %..�..;,�.�t�— +a1b.;C 3` ♦ t--_. :�,t.:3� I - A -.j. -- � � r`! � � 'psi 't1..'" r'i �,i���t • 1 } jY ty f � . r. ��11'�. .� �.. �f r 4 `��.ii�k `}•3r..�'" � h X i 1 h t��, D NORTH Cr. FY OF rrEM -. RANCHO CUCAM ONGA TITLE PLANNII\tG DIVISIaN EXHIBIT = 4!!�r scALD s�= C 35; Par l I Par. 4 /" D(^ • , 58 f LEMON .� r Q �• �� �$r !!l� Tk tor COSS 062 2 r ; 56 2L9A \ 4 4AC1 QM. 3i� [ 4.61AC. --mi l° l �`N s � 5). Par.3 Par' 4 ,p¢ 41' QOM Part r r ? 3 1.65AC N P4R r I /¢�le7NQ.JJl4 !0622 9 �, S.6 1A. Mk f 57 % 14 \ -�� T. iJ f�2 ?f SsoAc � .• / !z� RPprowec TT, IIWpo `. eau a 25 •! ��' �{ - fe i.__HIGHLAND-_. �,, �_' .._ ( -p f_ h ST)F t NORTH CIS OF ITEM.- 1f —� r RANCHO CUCAMO 4YGA TITS PLANNING DIVEION � �t EkHISIT =SCALE =�� a i n j ITY 0 ..AMING DI'VIS ON i MA I TITLE- -m e' fMWtt- eAMA(A—k 4-f. EYHIBiT�__ 1- t9 LIN J. K.; 1p t, -par a i( is � Ocrois liob� �, „ �••• iOGTION 0A' No! h: Scab Xaf• %I'iG '.+� 6•W.r H. SOa ' • � � StGTlflN � -6' NN hStab �Alwq R/ .•N a • . ! lea, EA7 ift S�GTlON `L•�` Nd fv .Fte/s -par a i( is -Ar -- kn I- - i , acorai n,r : ' C ` NORM CITY OF riEnl: l RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE�' acres � PLANNING DIVISION EKHIBIT. � scALE- DETAIL AT HIS ND h`c'1E G42AhTA. ti +ey CL12p1aA TREES AHQ GROUhgCOYER N1 ClRi3, PARKVKF PER CITYSTAkD1RU3 PLANT SELECTI ®N LIST TREES SHRUBS GROUNDCCVER ' � AIIR 4AR1A7FLORR CAYFLUl1S F7RI�AEN93 YYRTIR: CORWRWC01lACTA -1#�,p µR,y91�pi0�,q� . -. 3!9 RFTUSd fd�10A HE'iIW OLFAROtR YCCNK.73 d1CAl1pPTU }C�TNODORA .R79PER5 TRACRFl0.5TE1!{M..WIRiR�3 POLYARilRiY08 Prj;g um TCFMA FICJJS REFERS CAAJF{)S i.'JDOCAR►US ALtCROtitflFt'3 EWOAMhIFA . AULM VIW t RM DAVWF fFZ: TUiiF80'69t. HIGHLAND IVILLASr- JAAOIRCiR! TRACT 11926 i i NORTH CITY OF rrEM: RANTCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE= PLANhIINNU DIVISION EXHIBri. SCALE �- �; ii7r .. f l C�10 onus gain NN: JIM 'A in, IN■■■ R, FM RE AE .,10, a § z . \ may, \§ " piq w now mom % }§. Am,\ m . : \ , »ZIP (�- 2 . _ or \ r \ -as ( � % } / * may, now mom % }§. .� (�- 2 . _ or lWU ; ( � % } / * t� � w) � ' ©§ �^ % }§. .� t� � w) � ' ;f 3 e ='t y i .� •j s4 � _ ?:4J i .i iiil It .. a =,� +t'3 It � i f. ,. d i . i i • • . e r � • l��ii � z� . l.0 � �' �.o�i.• •• 7 .IF 2 o Al ! 1 � i i •' ♦ • j 2i Zf j i� . .�� J� •� !it � 7 (t i�EF F� _ fN; .} xi P mot' P .j iiFS N IVA� 41 Dl jj ` �) ^ff�c - :'� � ' Fig. z tai •` +�C•,44f Si �� (1 � � iF' x !: .' •. 4 . `-• iii �a9 it it kv It id 14 ii t • ii t er e ��.ri% /�'. G l /alp./ ° ¢r.Y � /•nk � tr � i�•r{•vY°_' � y sk It _ „tea �' { • ! N, b j jr, �%(�:,• (�rYtN� ,G � . • .rx 1 � ,. f , �. m ,! fflfff- ' M NO {tom r { 1. yj//fVJV� M.: K M IrN .i ispe - ' '�' v F0 iG • r - �07`�i r fs � • i�.t/. M ��'—` Wit•.':._ -� -- ` � G,,�i." ' _ . � /_r '� � NORTH CUY OF I CITJ � ui�ii�1(��T�A ���:� r� PLAT0IING DIVL(Z.IU'4 EYHiB1T, sa&LE �d:� . ..,�..aa. .� 6 A 2 . 4. � mac,_ �--�- NORTH CrrY OF RANIC.11-10 Tm, PLANNiNu DIMS EXHIBIT- cCALE-� CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA PART II INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONM -14 TAL CHECKLIST APPLICANT: CAI i -7'J F LI iG DATE: LOG NU`.BER �ttt Qe�� EPl�D -- PROJECT:—. J TOr�ff�afs tAJ /rG �fi.� F ,� rrF� .�c PROJECT LOCATION:-Al �_ t�fi�U�d�t1/ f A W&:1* hQF I. E'.nnRO %*MNTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). v q'. YES MAYBE NO I V V Ach I. Soils and Geoloev. Will the rroposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? C. ,Change in topography or ground surfacs contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e• Any Potential increase in Wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? -- f. Changes in arosion siltation, or deposition? g• Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud - slides, ground failure, or•similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extract4nn and/or use of any 'mineral resource? . 2. Liydrolofiy. Will the proposal have significant results in: t' v q'. YES MAYBE NO I V V Ach Page Z YES MAYBE NO a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage g patterns, or the .rate and amount of aurfaclI water runoff? ✓ c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? - / d. Change in the amount of surface grater in an_r body of water? e,. Discharge into surface waters, or any / alteration of surface water quality? !/ f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the qua -atity of grourdwaters, either through direct additions or with - drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? IZ h. The seduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public,warer suppl -ies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 1 '. 3. Air Quality, Will the proposal have significant -� results in: " a. Constant or Periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? V Stationary sources? "t b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable '• air quality standards? , C. Alteration of local or regional climatic - -� 4a conditians, affecting air movement, moisture I; or temperature? 4. Biota _ Flora, Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species,_ including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? . b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? / �/ c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal•have significant results in: a. Change In the characteristics of species, including diversity,, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result iu a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildltFe habitat? S. PODIIlation. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, dam_,ty, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change iu local or regional Socio- economic characteristics, including economic or' commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land•Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? Page 3 1 YES }L4Y3E Yo r V1-1 f a. A substantial alteration of the present or Planned land use of an area? L b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted p'Lans of any governmental entities? e. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive a: non - consumptive recreational opportunities 7 4 noise levels? ` 9. The creation of objeccionable odors? �l An increase in,light or glare? i Page 4 YES :AY9E NO S. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant results In: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? V b. Effects on existing streets, or demass for new street construction? r. ' Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? v d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? ✓ . e. Alterations to present patterns of circulz- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and % potential water- borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? V g. Increases in traffi- hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or redersrians? e 9. Cultural Resources' Will the proposal have significant results in: ' a. A distuvbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? 1d. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in, a. Creation of any health hazard or potentia? health • hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explos�'on or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector ar pathenogenic organismm or the exposure of people to such organisms? e.. Increase In existing noise levels? � f. e Exposure of people -to potentially dangerous noise levels? ` 9. The creation of objeccionable odors? �l An increase in,light or glare? i Page 5 YES a3YBE NO I1. AesthetLcs. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? b• The .ireation of an aesthetically offensive / site!' c. A linflict with the objective of 'designated or potential scenic corridors? V 12. Utilities and public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Elect*_-ic power? b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? / f. Flood control structures? ✓ ✓✓ 9. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? i. Police protection? J. Schools? -� _v k. Parks or other recreational facilities? ✓ ✓ ✓// I. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental bervices? 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? n. Substantial increase in demand upon existing / sources of energy? y' C. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? C d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non= renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? L2 Page 6 YES MAYBE NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or 1 scarce natural resource ?' 14. Mandatory Findings of significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the qualitf of the environment, substantially reduce the , fhabitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fih or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels;, threaten to eliminat, a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rate or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? N _ b. Does the project have the potential to achieve �✓ short -term, to the disadvantage of long- term., environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long - term impacts will endure well into the future). a. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, I-at cumtil,atively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual t project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). ✓ d. Does the project have environmental effects % which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? IL DISCUSSION OF EMMOMM4TAL EVALUATION {i.e., ref affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). ' Page 7 IIT DETER.KINATION On the basis of this initial evaivationz I :find the proposed project COLD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be pv,.pa=ed. Z find that although the proposed project :ould have a significant effect on the environment, there 1.G1 will not be a significant effect +✓� in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the prajrict. A NEGATIIE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. (-1 I find the proposed project MAY 7e a sign fican t enEirnment, and an ENVIRMIE\T LO? CT REPOR e on the is it r, t Date �ny nnoature, Title • i � a D LJ ADDENDUM TO INITIAL STUDY PART II FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11928 1. Soils and Geology (b), (c) The grading of the site will eliminate most of the datural grade separation and necessitate the removal of the existin�l trees. The de, ^ .3luNer's engineer has researched and studied diffj!rent grading alternatives and has determined that the proposed grading plan is the best solution for this site. 4. Biota -Flora (a). (c The development of this project will cause the removal of 15 mature Eucalyptus and 2 mature elm trees. This project requires the planting of 50 trees per gross acres which will add new species and a diversity of plants to the site. However, existing trees should be preserved in place wherever possible or shall be relocated elsewhere on -site for preservation. A written report from a qualified landscape architect or tree arborist shall verify the details of preservation or relocation. Any trees that cannot be transplanted shall be replaced in kind with mature specimens. The written report shall be submitted together with a Tree Removal Permit pursuant to Ordinance 37 and a detailed plan showing existing trees and relocation /replacement. 8. Transportation (b) Based upon analysis of the Cite Engineer, it is his recommendation that with the improvements that will be required on Highlan:_SAvenue for this particular project t "at this project will not impact the capability of traffic flow for this area of Highland Avenue.; 10. Health, Safety, and R!isance Factors f Noise. This praject will be impacted by future highway noise from the proposed Foothill Freeway (1 -210) north, of the site.. A noise study had been done per the requirement of the General Plan and has provided the following mitigation measures a. A sound barrier consisting of a wall or wall /berm combination shall be required along the Highland- Avenue. A final acoustical report to provide mitigation measures for interior noise reduction (45 CNEL) in compliance with Title 25 Standards shall be required. cr-1A.� � i f G 20, RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW/TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11928 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11928, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Dominic Salvati, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision and design review for 59 townhouse units on 5.85 acres of land located at the north side tf Highland Avenue, approximately 800 feet east of Archibald Avenue into 1 lu regularly came before the Planting Commission for public hearing and action on September 11, 1985; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and co ; -- tiered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered oth�-T evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11928 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is .physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subd' '.vision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage ano avoidance injury to humans and wildlife or their tiabit.at; (e) .he tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the Croperty within the proposed subdivision. -yam Resolution No. TT 11928 - Salvati September 11, 1985 Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11928, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: DESIGN REVIEW 1. To create interest and variety, the two outside garage, door; and the two inside garage doors, shall have different shades of color, materials, and design. 2. The proposed block wali along Highland Avenue shall be of stucco material Detail plans shall be submitted for review and aFproval prior to issuance of building permit. 3. Any proposed security gates shall be reviewed by Design Review Committee and Foothill Fire District prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Special e- 4—ance and landscaping statement shall be provided on Highland Avenue. 5. Private open space to the size of 225 square feet for ground floor unit, and 150 squars.,feet for upper story unit, shall be provided. 6. Existing trees shall be preserved in place wherever possible or shall be relocated elsewhere on -site for preservation. A written report from a qualified landscape architect or tree arborist shall verify the details of preservation or relocation. Any trees that cannot be transplanted shall be replaced in kind with mature specimens. The written report shall be submitted together with a Tree Removal Permit pursuant to Ordinance 37 and a detailed plan showing existing trees and relocation /replacement. 7. All trees to be saved shall be enclosed by a chain link fence prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit and prior to commencement of work. Fences are to remain in place during all phases of construction and cannot be removed without the written consent of the City Planner until construction is complete. ' Ll LA 7 E "-. d Resolution No. TT 11928 Saltati September 11, 1985 Page 3 I 8. A noun, barrier consisting of a wall or wall /berm combination shall be required along the Highland Avenue. A final acoustical report to provide mitigation measures for interior noise reduction (45 CNEL) in compliance with Title 25 Standards shall be required. TENTATIVE TRACT 1. The existing Hermosa water Company easements, for pipelines and reservoir prior to recordation of the final maps 2. Construct channel and access road improvements along east side boundary as recommended by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and as required by the City Engineer. 3. Provide a left turn pocket into the project on Highland Avenue as approved by the City Engineer. 4. The developer shall, in cooperation with the developer /property owner, (Tentative Tract 12991) of the property to tWe north, acquire and integrate into the projects the abandoned railroad property, located between the two properties. In addition, the final design of the project shall provide that the downhill slope between the two projects be located on the lower parcel, and the property line be located op the slope. The acquisition of this abandoned railroad property shall be accomplished prior to the recordation of the final map fGr Tentative Tract 19284, Tentative Tract 12991, whichever comes first.. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY CF SEPTEMBER, 1985. PLAiiINING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST. Jack Lam, Secretary Resolution No TT 11928 - Salvati September 11, 1985 Page 4 1, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Ccmmtiission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga:, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, sassed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamor�ga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of September, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit; 1� AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i t; Ll e l ', ., - ^a ao .fie wau aro. aT VY^ COOA ✓r VY. Lo ib cLO mo ^`vim n.ami° na °s °gNq a2. K. o°. .d.vu �.° mn.. vo.+ or ✓o La y ys.Rw."v. N =. ado e�N avmq$ ^cm iYGd.Y °u O YO='O CO a K G �b O.nE G 4'-a ..Ay yo eiu •A,�b6 cep y.: 2y u as 'u YFln G Nn Lys `y c ✓d pE Si E V d Sb. a• �ON YY. n. Sb ErQ U `� C^ a✓ YOC'q O OaadiO AaQ Yq6 YgmNC O - O�✓✓3�� UYd YN wb O1 � Y b d^ L 6 O Y A any C K L H✓ S Y N o n 01 y � C 6 ~ Q U O C A N +� Z p N � y ,� O� �. L Y ° E E 6 01L A y O n L 6L V` d q C mia q L d °a O Ty Y xy 6_ N wT T` N OMd Obey '�Y^ N4p. A�a 7V d ° • � � yam✓ Vq A✓ 00 AO. yp,fl �L �p ng.n .:D ✓. A m U 9•y nq _ 4 LeCiG r.L >� C N� d 1. $° L •O q O CC 4 C 6.t0y.0 4� OV y Y�PEp.^ T9. -9 V✓ Yom^ N. ryNOVt{i 0✓ .'T.^ _KN YT 6'�UAO.VSw A ` Y� O �-CG.p •;n <N ✓_. a...> m �,°G LU y 1 l { h 6 C YE y Lam^ End • cc o L ^u cn ✓pyN h.c o n z Y n a Rte^ O� 9 i q. Gn E CsN R. dY ✓= .pc Na ° h du aQ4 g. S d « d g b 'fi LL Z O. % 2 /If q Y r C > n A t. n.. �✓ p� 1,Ai. G 4 t y'J AYa ny V s. Y w ✓ Y ' { y. Y ° o G7 w c G L 4Y-y OA �.NN..cA•~ 9 O NAY y. O O. 00 C°V O•Cw C' ��QY1 V A> C G G A 4 6 d 3 C C Y Y Y ^, Oar i C. 7,C✓ Yy' WQ� � Gim C6.11� j • l Z 4Z U a •n L Q wM do ^ •^ NY a Ndd O w E d a a N M V 9 F G y EJ, N . n� 0410 A^p,p a L L N ^1.r Cd^ �C OOn. e�aw Ldoa ° j.n N L N p T V y y u y a FK v O 1 d1d aN d3.eF -n au^ �TUb� qs•o M.dyF qE> .�EC� amain Tu^oiL duN uA O V L p C G O.a pa C Q CE N o rLY itp p'=r C • �^ O. v G 4 T 2•� •._ � tuLpF- Va Yc�01 d a y d O� 6NUr� b r'f pp C `• d d E 7 � d L d _ L d 2 Jn V f O.�C.Ty�F -1 Vi IRE Ywni4al.+ lrt 3 I�ia,NL22 nNt°J b (� r� «tea i °aims' m oy�e. L. J 4�TClNAn �Nq q a ° ar. T d 0 N E d v� C^ C C a q N u dY� n0 of �.TaL NNn y LLa O« d °•'��1 X -L � �y GQ EG g C C d w• 1 4- � L _ = q � J^ �ap� ua°+N m y 'nV Jam Dd �O .r ry� ^•.•u nd �^ur NaL+.C� A �yd nN E C ° E O 4fnm O t 0 y V c� r.L �W'b7 • y C ^ q N O hi e M o 24 n EETdv nG�L .r0 oW.6 >.•C- �J N 4V V2i vOrdrr6 ^r= 30 �dia°i? W6.Q O Ij N4 1�f t(i ~1 1 V °'•C•D W Oi -2.r�� 'OyN ^q aC - -a .N - :IL 66 EMN dY: C= � ~Yu LW 'Nd TC d^ N c p0 .y- ^�Sya y ^� Qa1:E r• N 1° • rN a�aiN LaN SJ C CN�u Yp °p,AS C SL ¢YpC6 w 0yq dOLq �4fE yw r • ~x9W 4EJC CE ^�Q '0l-Al mN+� 9d On' ILgp V.d d� CEO�O 4v°- C11 •�E Ntifv rNEI°n ay a uim Year u d ... v9Ai Nm N•� �Y ^d �� cL` q�c aU _' a942 B ai mw2 -N o.oaY L El «L ^.r ° nr u.°. u ,,. w NCO QC L rZE.+—�q N CrC �O.N C Cp yMO ...0 L 7.G �C•- L.' N -1 CI .^ 01F C N 0 ABU O.L V_ NYq q 4 V =L Gdq 9u2 A6 M=CONLq Q'> _V.Fc 90,1,11 +Y-» US ���N V.�c YU�•n n«r, 9 LSC qlY Cwa r ... °emu >9 oYCaco 2 NNa Oa(`ai z -wa ^. 0 A q P.3 T S N O N T. C^ 0 6x 0 a d Tl a 0 ff9 L= aE�00a CO.L uCAd r' LO „pa v GC >4+ N•r -VyO ndt NGF�y M E01Lu >0C LOLL - C LW `IIa ^a N N CV N�..C. JA In a9Lia YC O� 6 ap° c G ^Y Ctpic 0 E� Odb^ .+ten° 1^S�a uL, tE wyp � gbnq F0E a y^ T N.e ° q=PLd Y.' Nom° C N. L N6S C V m t"• dNYV U O '.S Tdd °y atl W�. YNw b a »uw d °p. T] cJ,L LCFT'~.,6 C mG�O E Vo�EEU L V V LEa O.'c OVatT cCU O AJ� 1iC 01�d 1O M.q c dOa atiG :n C qL0 d O1R E ay Lq. b� pIL OO LJ •Y C»>•NY LIOV Lq wa. O k.lz6 'LSU �L.U» p�E C q 1� r N 4C A 6 —_AS t C7 cons q0 U C PL o} oo 2•.c•ofd t, -1 ct t ELmu it a d. � a N p C W^ •La. > L h. e, 7 6NZ ^EileL « iE.-.N �K o oN T o L uvay of AW. 'OOL.'+y =1 UN _ c �° c i c'OOaoadiN�y N.a 9TgN q u u L. L„r ca 4J U n� o`o�no9°L'ae rrT�-'Z ' aN'OL Otl.� aL 1a ..n��^��,1 �N���tttt•��• qr pNC v0 d rn y Pqp N Vqd� C E O .�CqC � N% yN° Op d.A Nad u pCA Et = p �j 09v.0 LaL+c YIK O N w qu.DgC i d o pp FF y Q -0 ° L W L G C d 0 u L y TTTT'"' .1 o p,i p nYN A C.t O ; 1 ° q N O� ° ••• O N U L V Y • i s G. � � °. � E i J d Z'E c N L 15-5 T Y E S t> 2 E w N ^ON QuTi� 4Y T;NO Iii 4t�iu��m PAN O 4A�OA 4u u.Oq o° ^N ad9 ^dA u 's o A c Lade C oyAa aoEE r y0 $z�� Y 66 C �-EOL q T ... E u v C dC A l L AQ U 94yp d aT n q!IIC> o N d C � n �.M°o s A N C L sEp Ag n •gg-La Yd op UE c. �.•°• N z o,.e Ly. orw" d e nv Eu a 9� iqa> aY 'c°L � LzS aY E q C ® O O N U O S C u L Y L O C C 3 L p b o iO E u N `«qao? m v'u d aL aLOq `pa `q Eq .pV. r ody �p u� .Ob nec >E. AO NL d. yo Au «•L•o d W U n` Pb E U� v0 Q MOB L PA ✓O i uC d.✓C A C v ME C 9 a N.N dO C o q r d S^ u N q dq ° �� gi w AS E s L Y_ nC^ ya 6y mil V Yo� T >y 9A.°.L UpOdi C EA UL6 ^' , l t CL FAO 6Gp QN N-1 n 6Z N y1°H NE N r try 'uN � a yy ¢n V Y9 O y q _•, L p m y ° cq E c T° d E c da E Ern€ uT W LLE E o0 9T .diOt u tion E° °E ,°,. sP O C ° N qp G`. N q6 LX y E a q a yam' ° r• d z r �" N x q c o-9. m ° om as o. ° w3 " VE 4 •O q p ° C V > J T 6 m. C... a V • N a G-o l uq Eon 2u o'• -Tc cT c 3 V V ' -I.; q.E q ° d G E, Y r G Y� O qua AV d ^O C p Yn myE aG9 P co y .N -ii•L. °'�..¢' y'."n �• u° oaN9° °E�a+�q 3... q �9 Y aiS F tS °� u� aai° ONon .E daLi 0. N T.qc ^ S O b O 9 N` d O . V p L. = p � p• ?. R h V V N€ a q C U^ .°Y m o V i U ° ° _ +'� - E td° LY Ta+ 'nee F•a9q r6 - SLWN6 hq a'L 6�GCLLN L.�q of n.V� e ` � O Itf) hI p _ � Mfl R W 2 til x ti 2 . ° X19 4-322 =. mC .a o.cq 3; n.r• C ^ a. Y y V LUQ T qn u m m u } N9 L ayN u�°aq .E+ o.- Z". . q °oc v q E q rnpa .X °vL qC+ L LqQ nUT �• V b .-.V M NL .•.q> Y Y� d dVE qM dam^ a qNL °� p Ly dy'd Z q dea �xt, cc ^cs Y aL H;z 289 N= O NEE n L? q C L 9 � � d ° C Q n D 1 C N � y �+ •� W ° �' qu r .t.• 4 °ad Ea a ~N fl9 .•.c y -t°LdN sm E L • a a q 0 9 a b —4.!: c 6 y � ar, t b ^ "°' 6 *• O j° O E cd L Y.O Y 6° T NM •ec t o d -F ° >_ a N w y AV2V dN9 O y�» x T�no y'j~ Y LL ^LYE p•N L C'V' °. T'°C °� P�.6 € Na L p Nq~O .n'VT 4 d 9 n TYa.q.. c FCO Np6 � O qN ^NZ C^ _ 4 qy n ,C N LPC Tc ✓Y Y� c�° �yi•.°- _ G. qw d9 d d a .�Nddq����yyyy^aaaaL° ..c.0 o. Y6 dN Vic^ 9q� '9 p,^ uM 1!1N C LE .c. Q rgs6C <G_. aI,N ° LO 6 p L ad n u L L T Vo au a ° ON -. ' U Qm i T L d 0 u� _per° ay Eudi q L d.q yd 01 ^'qU^ Y m o ¢d G i M Na ooi u O u C ; 'w 9. -2 E G• d m 6 L d° � 6 ® .N at �Q ti9 ^C C u a �° w. o oyc. rn.°+ c� om rq yd srn �� a o T fi u Gd pp u K O d O q U u °° O w d d WIV WUU 7d t9 =.q= CO 6 r0 6 N }./ f Q b t, t- S1 .N OMUe� qu ..A�a°. LclneNi °€ L N� j u9aC � L L W G OCL1 qy 6NC o O• 4 91.^....^r L O �G u o. 9 C N q yqS-w ° Ly V t 9.G E�wq. O Oq.rC N u emu_ rn4 y V 0 °u q�lr G Ld. A° r V L o O. N O y Mn o L d.ru. ., u..Y v rn —o'^,°e aRyL °4p9 •o�N. Es 4O6 .. o Grq roq� ° v °yL L od .ad a�q n m ° N Eli d O U L E N qdV> p.NY.A N YVN� 6gg0 y a N Lr I `1 moo v a°+n Nc9 r C_° c °a w.oac E m y yid O. E q s � E q V d m m O� T EO o d aN iCa N ' °�° uqa °t q qG4°.. uY� q•' GT 3e OQ y' U C..N T' o EEEFFEE� O. °-2 OIx w O °eM i� q E qOU Gam L L C �dG d U'N d eNU c ' mod~ b y G a m '�L � ~ Eya E9 y=a O G Y. G L > q E S E N y 6 L q 3 0 3= SL V • m V ca q a G G^ r L r ° q�C' d L O Gq' o y E t pq 6q� T d. p tLm.o V 60000 ale ^I = uo � O Cx mow^°. NC9E gal 0 z n v ui e 1z L ad n u L L T Vo au a ° ON -. ' U Qm i T L d 0 u� _per° ay Eudi q L d.q yd 01 ^'qU^ Y m o ¢d G i M Na ooi u O u C ; 'w 9. -2 E G• d m 6 L d° � 6 ® .N at �Q ti9 ^C C u a �° w. o oyc. rn.°+ c� om rq yd srn �� a o T fi u Gd pp u K O d O q U u °° O w d d WIV WUU 7d t9 =.q= CO 6 r0 6 N }./ f Q b t, t- S1 .N OMUe� qu ..A�a°. LclneNi °€ L N� j u9aC � L L W G OCL1 qy 6NC o O• 4 91.^....^r L O �G u o. 9 C N q yqS-w ° Ly V t 9.G E�wq. O Oq.rC N u emu_ rn4 y V 0 °u q�lr G Ld. A° r V L o O. N O y Mn o L d.ru. ., u..Y v rn —o'^,°e aRyL °4p9 •o�N. Es 4O6 .. o Grq roq� ° v °yL L od .ad a�q n m ° N Eli d O U L E N qdV> p.NY.A N YVN� 6gg0 y a N Lr I `1 =%2 2 a ifN as .nti - .� S x � n C.. ✓Y W L � � ^ p W� V L C gpdopY i W O OC.4 .G N d =.MHO Y LL Lq' C NtlYS Y+ aa� V C. C. Y�u q = Q u C dE ^6 q ca L . W O O d N T aA LL ¢ N L 9 S Ldu dq p4 y U d �dt yN dU �« r_a • L N u.gC.t d Cu LN >d � _ 'J•q 3 eLN n T dPC . NbE.NEEa "'G On 6EN �' LW GN40.N V � w '. C6y Nu up q0 NV O.CCC 6.Q O' OL y G.G 9U L9 °LCU n p S A W C Otm O.G. y PrnN N'Y Q ^^ c yY a2, Vz.t Et cC ,G Ot CTE C. A ° u L p Gym r L„^ �22up. yuyEy C 6'O U°.� d Y N GN A O'er .r 79 N 4 a �V �L° EL I of d °✓ S 4 C L. y A p .•, a d a 2 a p, E A O d �. d N Y� 4 �� q W C N a' U q � •' O C N q L L utY H aupcv°- c nun« v° .+ vv r ar.=\` a'u 4^ q n Lv C d Ax y ifN �+ L � °�E EF6N v • y am q. 4W. Oxp•+ '3 N. a .°u aim dm O y Y q C C E q q y i N Q u C dE ^6 q qu. 55 ^t N Q Em ^ r"� p w• N.o Np �C nd =A _pp L Ny .5.g O VL MC o •O1 OC yy TO. ar y3 L c9 °a, Ca. •+ L E N � V y CLI y p S A W C Otm O.G. C� O • N'Y Q ^^ N !i «� v NEEDE NT u 2 N r Et O ,G Ot CTE "'A V, Y v pdi yEp va n L EE N C B �ti 6 L U9 C I.i y G i e u i q N o G^ C G n 6 v E cNta •Gi • 1\ l 0 Z 4J U QJ •n O C. N- d_ u N h N V ti y y N 6 G W Y O = � i0f e z Nd o w ° da OW MN Oy M+ Lw Y. nu LM a= py so o dO �. r- Z; L dy' ' T W O• O^ C 0 •O•f tJ„ 4 L V o 23 �c c b•C. °d ud o N� �' �+ N y �3�.. Y� � � r••.W- Ypu E � � ° el d 4a^ a o v o 'QE d u. O' :�. •OV N _ C r!Y •.r V yy uL f} LT Oy d dC 9N tpi0 nti u `qG d Y NM U y. CI udi d E N Ly VY Gq W9 6N ACd •u4e d O �4 V Y d L 'y CA :C N q 6u �•q C Na V °ur .c aT od oq na d O d u u E L. d d OO d o .i � d C 4 LNy W at 9 O nd ZZ n 6n d �- �T `r W C L Via.. ON Wa- <n o n a dL _o r. u u ° N� O d_ u N h N V ti y y N 6 G W Y O = � i0f e z Nd o w ° da OW MN Oy M+ Lw Y. nu LM a= py so o dO �. C`pr 0 4 L V o 23 �c c dGn � ° el d °• p, a o v o u `qG SL U V Ly L.` N O V Y d L 'y CA ' SpA L n �•q C Na � n n c `r W C L •_^ a dL _o r. u u ° N� O o d •,� Z d2: Sd u L Off' �� Od I.. d d. Q� N UNn L U 'O O ;Y n• y mil d • ,N, c rn pS aun•,•. V U•r. Gnq r Gp•..b. ddC W OC�� _ O adid AOU OLC T L•�9 d �Y F° ,clod v. o �^ 66N 6NdaZC bf� Y1 O tD A. ^d' Ld` 6T N. LL G � I 1-S3 d_ u N h N V ti y y N 6 G W Y O = � i0f e z Nd o w ° da OW MN Oy M+ Lw Y. nu LM a= r] CITY OF RANWIV CUCAIVIONGA STAFF REPORT a OI F U DATE: September 11, 1985 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, 6mmunity Development DirE;,tor BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -20 - HOYT LUMBER - A request to construct an 8,000 square foot war house building itidition to an existing home improvement center and the development of a Master Plan on 2 acres of land in the Office Professional District located at 7110 Archibald Avenue, north corner of Base Line Road - APN 202 151 -33: I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan and master plan, e evations and issuance of Negative Declaration. B. Purpose To construct an additional 8,000 square feet to the existing 11,200 square foot retail commercial home improvement center. C. Location: 7110 Archibald D. Parcel Size: ± 2 acres E. Existing Zoning: Office Professional F. Existing Land Use: S. M. Hoyt Lumber 'Company /Home Center, vacant,. G. Surrounding_ Land Use and Zoning: North - Southern Pacific Right -of -Way, vacant; Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) and Medium High Residential District (14 -24 du /ac) South - Vacant; Senior Apartments; Office Professional; High Residential District (24 -30 du /ac). East - Vacant; Apartments; Neighborhood Commercial; Medium High Residential District (14 -24 du /ac). West Vacant; Aluminum can company and Alta Loma School (Elementary); Medium High ,Residential District (14 -24 ! AM du /ac) . 1 PLANNING COMMISSION` STAFF REPORT CUP 85 -20 - Hoyt Lumber f September 11 1985 Page 2 H. General Plan.Desioations: Project Site - Office /Professional North - Medium and Medium High Censity Residentiai South - Office Professional, Hiy.� Density Residential East - Medium High Density Residential Test - Medium High Density Residential 1. Site Characteristics: One -half of the site is developed with a ` home - improvement center, the remaining one -half is vacant. Vegetation consists of indigenous weeds and one mature Eucalyptus tree. Lomita Court at present is unde,­ construction for street improvements. r J. Applicable Regulations: Section 17.02.130 of the Development Code allows expansion of a non - conforming use and structure through a Conditianal Use Permit to be, reviewed by the Planning Commission (see attached June 13, 1984 Planning Commission Staff Report regarding the use determination). II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Planning Commission at its June 13, 1984 regular meeting, held a public hearing, and approved the expansion of a non- conforming use and structure - Hoyt Lumber. The Planning Commission also established criteria that the expansion should exceed 8,000 square feet and a Maser Plan should be prepared for the entire parcel. The applicant has provided such Master Plan illustrating: (1) the expansion of the home center conforming to the minimum commercial development standards and (2) a conceptual p'an for the remainder portion conforming to the Office Professional use regulations and standards. Also, the applicant is proposing on -site improvements including upgrading the exterior of the existing portion of Hoyt Lumber. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee has reviewed the project and determined that the proposed use and the overall site plan and Master Plan comply with the intent of, the Development Code. However, the Committee recommended that the following improvements be made which the applicant agreed to: 1. Provide the same sandblasted horizontal band and color trim treatment to the north elevation. 2 Provide landscaping along the north elevation to break up ` the height and mass of the building. E J- a PLANNING COMMISSION ,7. YF REPORT CUP 85 -20 - Knyt tu4 er September 11, 1985 Page 3 f C. Environmental Assessment: Part 1 of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts on the environment as a reault of this project. A copy of Part II of the Environmental Checklist is attached for your review and consideration. III. FACTS FOR FINDI'NGSS: The propose `;xtensior,will not be detrimental to the goals an 7 objectives of ti,e Gener,�al Plan and Development Code and will nct be detrimental to t-.te health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to the surrounding properties. In addition, the proposId use, building design, and site plan, together with the - :9commended conditions of approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. E IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report as a public hearing and noticez were sent to all the property owners within 300 feet of the project site. 4 V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomrr, nds that the Planning Commission consider all material and input 'regarding this project. If the Commission concurs with the Findings, approval of CUP 85 -20, through the adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of 4 Approval and the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. Resp ctfull s4omitted, Jack Lam Community Development Director JL :NF :ns Attachments: June 13, 1984 Planning Wmmission Staff Report & Minutes Exhibit "All - Locat4on Map Exhibit "8" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site 'Jlan /Master Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan and Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Cross Section Exhibit "F" - El "Ovations €£ Initial Study, Part IT Resolution of Approval with Conditions J� �F C CITY OF RANCFO CUCAMONGA STAFF h EPORT O GUCANlp V 1:4 ob z l O F Z U La I DATE: June 13, 1984 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commi-.sion FROM: Risk Gomez, City Planner SUBJECT: 'EXPANSION OF A NUN- CONFORMING USE AND STRUCTURE - S.M. HOYT.LUMBER COMPANY HOME CENTER - 7118 A CHIBALD I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Planning Cv-mlission review and consideration to allow an expansion of a non' conforming use and structure (Development Code Section 17.02.130). B. Purpose: To odd an additional 8000 square feet to the exis�ing r 2square foot retail commercial home improvement center. C. Location: 7118 Archibald D. Parcel Size: 2 ± acres E. Existing Zoning: Offize Professional F. �',_is�tingLand Use: One -half of the site is developed as the S M. Hoyt Lumber Company /Home Center, the remaining one -half is vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Southern Pacific Right -of -Way South - Vacant; Approved 219 unit senior citizen project East - Vacant; Approved 240 condominium ,project West - Vacant;` Aluminum can company and Alta Loma School (Elementary). H: General Plan /Development District Designations: Project Site - Office North Medium High Density Residential (14 -24 du /ac) South Office Professional East - Medium High Density Residential (14 -24 de /ac) West - Medium Hi,' Density Residential (14 -24 du /ac) I'I. ANALYSIS: Me a plcant, S.M. Hoyt Lumber Company /Home Cen {_ +r, is requesting the Commiscc on Is consideration to expand an existing legal non - conforming retail home improvement center consisting of 11,200 ITEM PLANNING COMMI< 1 STAFF REPORT Hoyt Lumber June 13, 1984 Page 2 square feet by adding an additional 8,000 square feet of retail floor area. The building was originally approved by the County in 197: in accordan'Ze with the County General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The issues the Planning Commission must consider are three -fold: 1. Does the applicant's request for expansion present an impediment of the City's implementaton of its General Plan and Development Code. 2. Does the proposed expansion represent a detriment to the surrounding properties. 3. Doe^ the expansion allow sufficient use of the remaining portion of the site to implement the General Plan and Development Code...goals and objectives. In regards to the first issue, it is the intent of the Development Code to limit the number and extent of non- conforming use and structures by regulating their expansion and /or alterations. The Development Code has provisions which provide the oppc ,•inity for the Planning Commission to review requests and, as in this case, to determine if expanding any non- conforming use would be detrimental to the goals and objectives of the General Plan and Development Code. The General Plan and Development rode designate this site as Office /Professi�),al land use. The intent of the General Plan was to develop a neighborhood center concept for the area of Base Line. and Archibald which `would provide for neighborhood commercial, office, and higher dei,sity residential. While the Noyt Lumber Center existed prior to the City general Plan, it wF the City`s position to designate the site as an_Dffice /Professio -1 land use as opposed to carving up the site with one -half relating to the existing commercial /retail home center use and the residual as office. This request does limit the implementation of th City's General Plan /Development Code goals and objectives for Office Professional uses for tpis portion of the site. There is no mitigation '. this limitation to the implementation of the City's General ''an and Development" ^ode. This use is relatively new and, if successful, will remain on this site for some time. The secone `issue relates to the impact to surrounding pro - erties ` due to th- applicant's requested expansion. The prcpo59d- expansion is contig-ous to the Southern Pacific right -of -way. North of the. lam' s �- . STAFF REPORT Hoyt Lumber June 13, _'4 Page 3 S-.juthern Pacific right-of-way is a mixture of other non-conforming uses (rental yard, contractor's office and yard). Along the west property line are 72 market rate apartment units which are part of the approved Calmark project. East of the site$ atross Archibald: are 290 residential units setback approximately 200 feet from Archibald, In addition, the existing home center is set back 72 feet from Archibald. parking The southern one-half of the site is vacant. T1* proposed expansion does not propose to extend into this area exc,�vt possibly for a fire access lane and additional landseving. The proposed expansion does not appear detrimental to the surrounding properties to the north due to the separation with the Southern Pacific right-of-way and the nature of the existing non-conforming land use. The residential project to tb,4est seems to be separated by a proposed setback of 36 feet on th- 'home center, side and 20 feet on the side of the apartment prject. As a comparison, any commercial project adjacent to a residential zone provide a 30-foot,-, setback in conjunction with a height limitation Of _25 feet within 100 feft of any residential district. In addition, the site seems appropriate to handle the expansion, Currently, there are 58 parking spaces for the existing 8000 square feet. This meets the cureent fpet of retail area for lumber yards, excluding outdoor display. ratio of 1 per 300 square The 'additional area of 8,500 square feet will require 26 parking stalls for a total of 63 spaces. Providing only a deficit of 5 spaces, which could be eliminated with redesigning the existing � parking - -.-.. layout. The final i%sue is focused with the southern one-half of the parcel. The residual portion is approximately 35,000 square feet, approximately 100 feet wide X 1.50 feet long. The Ocvelopment Code requires a minimum parcel size of 40,000 square feet (one acre) with a minimum width of 200 feet and a minimum depth of 175 feet. At first, tnis residual portion would seem to be deficient to meet the minimum Revelopment Code officelprofessional standards shoul(i the applicant want to'develop the remaining portion in a permitted The only mittl3ition to this Is that the entire parcel be conceptually designed as an entire center with the appropriate easements for zccess, parking and maintenance. PLANNING COMISS(_ STAFF REPORT 1hyt Lumber June 13, 1984 Page 4 III. STAFF RECOMh1EN0ATION: If the Planning Commissior can concur that the p— roposea expansion will not be detrimental to the goals and objectives of the General Plan and Development +ode and will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare, or be materially injurious to surrounding properties, staff would recommend approval of the applicant's request with the following conditions: 1_ That the applicant prepare a master plan for the entire parcel illustrating the expansion of the home center conforming to the minimum Dqmerciai Jeveloprent Standards and the conceptual i'evelopment of the residual portior conforming to the Office Professional use regulations and standards. In addition to the requirement of Commission review of the project tecause of its location on a Spezial Boulevard (Archibald), that the master plan be brought to the Commission for review and approval at the same time as the Commission considers the expansion design review. s 2. The expansion be limited to no more than 8000 square feet subject to , provisions necessary for on -site parking and improvements for both the home center and devlopment of the sou 'n portion of the entire site. �w ^ Res lly submitted,`. r ' Rick:Gom z Cit''PI ner pRG :jr� 44 Attachments l i lb i CONS CALENDAR Motion: Hempel, steonded b y McNiel, carvied unanimously, to adopt >140vby the ConseA. VIEW R CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -12 - LEDERMANN - Reapplisation for gn review of zr,difications to the architectural designs for a prose 0 to b�ACT ]orated on the northeast corner of Church and Turnc: --� APN 10 B. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIP 10246 - ASSAD - A custom lot si,;division of ten Rares of land into lots located in the R -1- 20,000 (Single Family Residential /20,000 sq foot lot miP..imum) zorwi on the sou'hwest corner of Hillside Road and dsven Avenue - APN PUBLIC HEARINGS C. HOY. :.UMBER - Co4sideration of a request, to expand a por.- conforming use and structum located at 7110 Archibald. City Planner, Kok fllklmez, reviewed the staff report anc showed slides of the ex4sting commercial use. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. Rick Nelson,,7110 Archibald, the applicant, stated he was very interested in knowing what he wouli be able to do with the rest of his lot acid expressed agreeaent with the Plan;;ng findings. There baing no Airther comments, the public hearing rras closed. Commissioner MaNiel stated there was a conflict in the Development Code relative to non - conforming use expansion mid cited page 14, items C, G and F. Assistant City Attorney Hopson replied that there is no conflict, as the last clause in C1 explains when and how an zxisting use cat: '^e expanded, that it is not as inconsistent as it at first appears, and, t at G15 gins further explanation. Mr. 3omez stated that the verbiage was added because the abatement schedule was eliminato'. He further explained that the findings would have to be met as set forth in the Development Code on a case by case basis. Commissioner Hempel explained during the General Plan hearings certain areas in the City were mentioned to be non - conforming uses areas in order that the General Plan would not have to be changed for each individual site. Further, it was done in this manner so th.�.. Expansion of uses tauli be allowed. P ` Planning Commission Minutes -2- June 18, 184 lb Chairman Stout stated with respect to non - conforming uses, the Commis -Aion should discourage 4ny expansion, but since -this expansion would be to the rear of an existing structure and not really visible from the street, he thought if the Comaission has th -" capability of bringing the front' structure up to current City standards that may be the type of trade -off that would make the non - conforming use able to be expanded. Chairman Stout felt that a master plan for the site would be excellent and provided some comments relative to blending in with the residenti ;l uses near it as well as changing the roof to enhance it. Commissioner Rempel asked if Chairman Strut is referring to the new building or the old, one. Chairman Stout replied that he Js referring to both and that what is neeiad is sonde type of landscaping and treatment. Commissioner Hempel stated that there t_11 be another building between this one and the one proposed. Chairman Stout stated that h3 would rather have the architecture of t ":e old and existing buildings upgraded rather than have the new structure brought down, Commissioner Barker stated :hat he was a little uncomfortable with this but as long as there will be a master plan specifically aimed .,aji architecture and landscaping, and it will conform to the surrounding are' Mr. Nopson stated that this ite:a should be brow b,.ak with a specific proposal and findings. `.otion: Moved by Hempel. seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, that this piece of property be allowed witnin the non - conforming usa category with consideration of the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission and their future review. l D. IR(iNtNTAt ASSESSMENT ANL '�'- _IDITIONAL USE 2ERM1? 94 -05 - DANNA The sstaBIA.9bment of a recreational vehicle storage yard on 2.4 ,acres of land in the Lo s ;dential District generally located on the south side of Base Line, east �ermosa enue - APN 1077 - 051 -�40. Senior Planner, rim Beedd the staff report. Commissioner Barker asked where 45 feet w be cn the rasp when measured from Base Line. Mr, Beedle. -add cizrjfied that th�measent hould b e taken K 45 feet from tae line. Planning Clo: mi.ssi;5n Mi.9utes -3- Junb.. ?,, 198b '' h � n �.ru�au is aSALIG,= u-1 i R /�Y P=wa I M I ! I / MH . wGkIJT ~W�j,NT YwGUr M ` 9W.Pw6 zoof I ; - -- - -- - - - - -- 7 �.� ti - / MM 1 (uuDeR ca.t: +Taua-�ov) t Ljv A °TB %,PzAmr N4CNIi 67 / vKAur `t�-� ---7 T- T NORTH CI'T'Y OF PLANNIN U DIVISIQi`i EXHIBIT- _. SCALE," ra Ll NORTH` CIrP( OF E. IM: rt PA- 2� RANCHO CUCATTVIONGA PLANNING MOON EXHIBIT : L- �: LC- J \a • �4a or �mtRr. �7 (rui as f J 1 6fa o ro* 4tqc ion! alias Al- G F 4 CITY OF rrEtN4- PLANNING JIVOON EXHIIt i : I6YL4i111 {uV '•�. NIWB� i �y 9JJeT1AL �Aie aggt -wr o-a. NORTH CITY OF ITEM: RAN010 CUCAMONGA TITLE- St_ry'.7f04t PLANNING IXiYMN EXHIBIT. - SCALE- --� I tea nturauo.arp _�CIITH'�'�...°yXfi�l R:►•iKFaR � 'gwv�aa°f . eea er+t�T � t E M ALI - I . Own- 1-5-, _ n . L�V NORM i1 MY OF rr&'A- RANCHO C rCAMONGA TrrLE= ' 51 Jh tON5 PLANNar;G DIVRON EXHIBrr:_ . , - i( CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART'II — INITIAL STUDY INVIRONZIENTAL CHECKLIST ,. DATE: d Z APrLICAN`E: r r FILING DATE., MWP R� T LOG NUMBED: e .• PROJECT: $Qpp Sn?.iT. T aOLilt.tJ OJc d YI�dpE �b�1�49, w�K'lE/lr7' t�Fl%� PROJECT LOCATION:(] /��iffy�L{� A7/P- I' E*iG'IRMENTAL IMPACTS (Explpzation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required sheets). on attached 1. Soils and Geoloev. YES MAYBE NO e Will the proposal 'avc significant re suits in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, c- mpaction or burial / of the soil? c. ,Chauge in topography or ground surface- contour intervals? V/ d. The destruction, covering or modification of �. any unique geologic or physical features? j e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erasion siltation, cr deposition? V/ g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazard; such as earthquakes, landslides, mud - slides, ground failure, or•similar hazards? h. An increase in thr rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? 2. H drolos , 5:i11 the significant —�—_ . - proposal have results in: Page 2 YES MAYBE \0 a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or channels? ephemeral stream b• Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c• Alterations to the course or flow of flaod waters? - %' _ d. Change in the amount cf surface water in any body of water? `/ e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interfererce with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water .other- wise available for public water supplies? i. Exnoscre of people or property to ziater related hazards such as flooding f, ,,niches? Air Quality, Will the proposal have s'� results in: xttifcant I a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? F b. Deterioration of ambient air gi,rlity and /or Interference j with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? E C. Alteration of l.;cal or regional climatiz conditions, affecting al,7 movement, moisture or temper%ture? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal hatie significant results a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? , b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique rare or endangered species of +? plants ?(_ �� Page 3 c. Introduction YES `L NY BE SQ of nev or disruptive species of plants a,to an area? J d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal rave significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any spec:,s of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare r P or ensangered species of animals? Z.. Introduction of new or disruptive species of y animals into an area, or result in a barrier- to the migration or movement of animals? \J d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or / wildlife hab ;::3t? S. PODulati°n. V411 the proposal have sign3.ficant results in: a. Will rae proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or grc• ;th rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results ia. a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, Including economic or commercial diversity, ttm rate, and property values? b Will project costs be e2.•itably distributed r amorb project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, trot payers or project users? 7. Land Tse and Planning lonsiderat8ons. Will the proposal have significant results in, a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any dc,signations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of an 4 entities? y governmental t V c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of ;I i=x Sting consumptive or non- consumptive j ,recreational apgortunities? Page 4 YES .L4YBE NO 8. Transbortation. Will the proposal have significant results ins "- t a. Generation of substantial additio•!<il vehicular movement? v ' b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? C. Effects on existing parking, facilities, or demand for new parking? d• Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present patterns cf circula- tion or movement of people and/or good4.? f.. Alterations to ok effects on present and Potential water - borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? f g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists _� or pedestrians? �! 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal _:3ve significant results in: a. A disturbat.ce to the integrity of archaeological, r paleontological, and/or historical, resourczs? l0. Health. Safetv, and Nuisance Factors. Will the — proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to Potential health hazards? C. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an acci:ient? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pa *henogenic organisms or rho exposure of people to such organisms? e. increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? I I g• The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? .I f Page 5 1 YES :14YnE f O 11. -esthetics. Will the proposal have sig +iificant results iu; a. The obstruction or degradation of any scetqc vista or view? The creation cf an aesthetically offensi,,e site? C. A conflict with the objective of designated r' or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? Sc / c. Co=unica;.ions systems? --- d. dater supply? ✓�/ e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood contrt structures? ___ y l g. Solid waste facilities? --- h. sire protection? i. '' *lice protection? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilitics� including ` r roads and flood control facilities? m- Other governmental services? ✓ 13. Enerev and Scarce Resources. Will tine proposal have significant -- �auLrs in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing �^ sources of energy? if c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? , d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non— renewab7, forms of energy, wheci feasible renewable'sout;.es of energy are available? 4y% Page 6 YES MAYBE ho e. Substantial depletivn of awy nonrenewable or scare natural resourie? 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Dogs th¢ project have the potential to degrade the qitality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below• self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or Iostrict the range of a rare or endanVered plant or animal or eliminate Important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory; V� b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -tern, to the disadvantage of long-ter-m, environmental goals? (A, short -term impact on the environment is one whit`, occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long - term impacts will endure well into the Future). c. Does tho project have impacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an Individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the lffeLts of past projects, and Prot-Able future prolectt). d. Does the pre ect htvc environmental effects a which will cause substantial adverse erlects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION OF E[vr1 R0',r- T%SPAL MALU4TION (i.e., of affirmative answers tr the above questions 11as a discussion of ro osed mitigation P P _ S n measures). WPM g IM ed Rie n rA eA d a 6 i vo 11 Loth r .:x C OIL 6 -83 8 t �J .fA1) 1 tti�lSSu+n a. rYI r • �i? , . —Azt d Q f� a 4 ._' s. 0701 -02 0 9- 11-85 P.C. Agenda Packet a Page - of 6 Page 7 I11. DETEMMINATIOy On tbe. basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed-project COULD NOT have a significant effect nn the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION wil be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet, have been added to the DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. Project. A NEGATIt I find the proposed project IMA? have sign f. ant :e£ Le. ervirnaen2, and an E;4IRv v: t 1 I,�g REPORT Date_ �itL?j ��i` 1 �--- gnature Title t s RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCANGIGA PLANNING COMMilSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 85 -20 FAR THE EXPANSION OF A HOME IMPROVEMENT CENTER AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MASTER PLAN LOCATED AT 7110 ARCHIBALD AVENUE IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of August, 1983, a complete application was filed by Hoyt Lumber for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of September, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described project. € NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be me':, 1. That the proposed use is in - accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of tha applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued or September 11, 1985. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit Na. 85 -20 is approved subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The same sandblasted horizontal band and color trim treatment shall be provided to the north elevation. 2. Dense landscaping shall be provided along the north elevation to break up the height and mass of tha building. 3. Dense landscaping shall be provided along the western property boundary for screening and buffering the adjacent residential use. Resolution No. CUP 85 -20 - Hoyt Lumber September 11, 1985 Page 2 4. Future expansion of the site shall be subjected to the Development Review process to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. A 6' foot block wall with a minimum of 2 feet being retaining wall is to be designed, to City standards and constructed along the entire length of the northern property boundary. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS _11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Jack Lam, Secretary I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plann ",ng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at. a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of September, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: j NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: t J -may O i 4 a u Y L N U t d >P Y N C L^ ^ T q Y • <. L yQSd Q�4 Y YUNq pp. q6.L NdM Mu. WL Oa ^Jv� udeN_ N °> YO dy'� LAN 6V GV CU yYd 2 coy O.YUd d 4AU. WE °N Izl �c d N Cu t O N a V09N e'O ay. UcNdO du.° U ypC u C d�6 q Eu N< HOC nYgg)1 uy N Oz ; u -8w2 S�.w`O yuG I7,. u 4� t.'o'' n o o, u° n &N o a. u w oNN v . al° •a s > con -o < � N d � y6 C L Y V EEC O 4 N µ 62 N G N N N N a °- �S O y •O NNdhN No. °.. N' 4N D �� ^d e�q0 NO pe,U O TE« ...p d ^�'E LuOr N dL9.y° 4q y63��N LN Pc L �UN Le•. ryq'�Y L gacU hyo0 N.aN``}} t�Y ..^ n0496. ' .°m o.,. N u �c a N L.O $d NYUF$ Y0.0 q01 ool b FLOCp �u '.Odd0. vc bd^ C � EE Y< N G > pal GMU2 2G:E 'C U d U E d YY Z e C` Y U U 2-W85 4 O c 4. N U 8 Nd tl n >u r-� c 6 +'YNLV 6 0. >^n >cd r�F.NYd� L n^ LN NS C6« if..l SNLA =+O'O.ON KV� 4N�'YM3 40' +7 �/N FZ.6L I m � N w ^ L O . u Oyu 00 3-2.5 Yom. N u T u III O n q. A TTT"' hZ. EE uC d � � E c LNNN Y N4`^ O O.^YYN S N d d ^nYd Q NY z° Tai d <. 6W.a y q. L y 7 Q O NN O =9 C N c ^ IS O G t t q N a N° Y. t S O N 9? U J N C 3 J yQq 4 °.er o N N 4 L L Y d O1. IL � '` I li4 r o vr •- N c M rY .mod m�'g p O Id -fi OI.Si a .. 6U G NY H'.YY -!:-A... V. .e O OU EI= $ �n UU $c3 G 4 u N L� =.a -N�M.� -ate E C � C c N4ci do ^ 6q^ • ° ^4 C4:orc °4I1L Y` ®®O1'°n�. • �QaLdad S �.`_O _� GY w o -vo Yu+Yj4� pq tG Np MQS €O.� ua NsN A L �aq d 6 tntn °etA N aL' a D a.. o O G L y i E N r .; d S Y Ya °° q °C.P.s:O LNEu ^ gas NN 4•4� 3G= . O o AS�4•i°u n O 5. N T C oc yip E� _ A Y 66 oNN L' V r C Up LY O� t•06..0. RCuL A w ^E.YN G 6.Y 6L pgLYD��,Y A' NLLL >...�C1r 9�O in dN� 4 M aAL gam. wwN. os V_Cr NY ge4.J.r�O d�dCL 13'ad`non °Y a+ d o�gaNUL q _ fa ti -L.4 rs. °4iL O`.E �VLNC C o'Ls o >o ..n^i'^ n,En"4Li qya m'"9 NM 6L CC rEC�j A°� -=v u N5 lG /:� 4J q O GOV =Y11� ^O W9a p.SNON°� Cr�U_6�0 OV�`ZVp ONq A �' cu •rJ c+ Cd 0 A W T« N q O O y V 'N�V..r �Y c E E c� NA $.. ^^ d 0 •`O.. C:pN y L, =Ya e1F VAi�Y L��Gw A� d Y O. T O L1 �uo.0 L" qN•..`T S �NMr A ADO o LrYRO. °t> LO. A N ^... n` w � O q °•^ CC N F� V^ r d 9 T r0. O . ua> vc.c V- C ADOL Ar. .ct Y M O.O LD cN.0 TqL' ° U�..r.... �N.Or�a C •qY aNE �u N. ^. VpiOw �•i' �d+vLu � I .a.. L ^�.q a G � ^u.LN.. y p 1G I =aGOC M •pL� d dc y�d d OSV .qa i-° r u nm cn < L°oq r L° f. rngL[A6 TQ„9 EN 9 � y �Y O MDO = Y D�'^c• «> d U d5a c O iLO L O da �' N 9 �V G Y •� C. T C y LE L~ x F O CCC N.p G G UpO! 'C ° 60 N ILOa. N dd q OEM �6Y `G4 qd 9 6� �O Odp O 9�N 4 E«66 O:NY. W� 'G2 Nr NNL=S VLl C V u.°L. O C L 6 Wr'^6. +Y W r�Y Y C A ^ y p 4 Lwsio C C NL E C � C c N4ci ° N B C° L T • C � � 6 . Y,LC w. 9• .�a'.o °w L i na u «6o MQS n CC 6 °c ooN «M CwL°�.Nn d^� N oa LN. ai 41 TL U uY de.^ LN � NN o Od0` Lp@ ML. C aAE.dOVLA2 GC�NL q °C.P.s:O 9dN ^N r �L w� V UNn A � wd 6 t EM U..G°. ar NL .VU bdw. t. NQ A N L NY <. NO�r u H9 LNG p G 6 >LN•U""L Ny w$ ¢epn.N.r ^iapC r� O.L. ^WS nO LOV V_Cr NY ge4.J.r�O ....Y �GNC LA X-9 ^C qE n� 76 grNe ^�O,q°ov Y V O`.E �VLNC C NOYP « yE aM' CF J cLC °• 9r= NM 6L CC rEC�j A°� • LZ «OWN u N5 lG /:� nO +c vC P1paY GOV =Y11� ^O W9a p.SNON°� Cr�U_6�0 OV�`ZVp ONq A �' >dP yT—m LOG ` ° C` Yqq U9�9 �V AL CFA oPr 1. .�.?NL pl.q NO.CLL '. JAOL. �6 np M> cd r1 ^`'q 'dYy d d t «: LC 6 ^N1dr9w q�CCC. ?EF NMgC.nCp TOY`; ^g+ •`O.. C:pN NYO. 99 d4 �yd w �6 Q. ...r° Lq cU .`+L•`I CO N.G T.. OI CPCL da. OdA G� qN•..`T S �NMr uM C E NE a • ` °L9 AL mSJ�N «� T W n ° pOO^ 6 N Nyc N E r NU ��_.� NC OLdh • c �V Y •O qK ..°. N N ON . Tp.Y p dTa CO.`1 =6N 'eo . ua> vc.c �o c�a Tb^ �° coup °mac C.0 uo °= -` �q° a Nq 6 L >° sL. w c �d+vLu � I .a.. L ^�.q a G � ^u.LN.. y p 1G I �•e° %D n a .a:>:.Ndr - u '>o 4c , °ABv V d dc E ^ea �Nd Nr O>° A MmG • 6�Ai. OSV .qa i-° r u cc o (..ry,NCA cn < L°oq r L° f. rngL[A6 �1' Ll asu o L or ad a0A q0 a �C O1uO }OO q.. tOd LAy UTZ ELNb ..•qey Soc ^ � qi co oia+ °H >; L. buN'.'.c do °� ZdAN ^a A OfO '°.drAp.�o cum. °ate VY'o ee�I Q' ^O 1! °• A ya .�•�.Jb aON� E L. °� O1yC ^ N N G 6 O A y q G N > >s O G �O q0 •d �� Nb IC y p .'1 YL. p ANU OL 9 GLbA N L qb y.� �i d A' a A r •y Yb ^CK0 �N;s ybT ^N A TNU^C' •z.. ^ a C Y Y A r N j. } N 0 N W. �' a Y .°C O N N C• « V .O PAZCI Nb7K a0 nN0 � ~CV urnLC NpdO.' Cq �yC s• oa• ( N aq pa p a ^ b�:o d •+c � L o yio > ^LN �'m �+� ° np ca �rq�� €. Cr� N' • �^ N L O T Q L t y Car d d r� b N E T 9 •.• p L 6 N N^ b N L ..•. L i C L '^yfiT L ^ ON Mq d0 V'.d Wal b >b �V 2 CdOif:. NFL d6Y O E R °a C C6 o NL CY L Hap+ L6 'a-"Z ^pq GL CA ,� y C NpC AWL. YdY a. NL O 7K �� aia � d dvpiLt Lg1AT b d 6 b O •� p r ` p a. g q d d L d A .•. L °> ° L O d h � I � N a L j• t u Q 'O O« A6Uid 6bi C ^du Up Np Ct N•Ca6 N. Lb >0.0 y ALY E d •� O L �4 N V O C l w,92 `. 6 0 C A V C N LL O 6 N 172 o. bb COI .• C . A ^Ay L - uQr^ b L C A O 6 ni dppM �0. E N Y 4=i=6.f CO dCWp dS0.bya y o q 2.2 Ld1 u�— AA qN q od dp an.. °oN iuo L�Qa a ^ Le 9 ,;: �@ •an u'OV qi '_n aN+.^N• AHiV.� L p ' p ,N. Y y@ C L C •.°. q p 6 g G N L a o _ W Y L m9 G q 9 C L C d 6 L N a •' ��. C°b C C S q� L W .Cp �dNp � Ny A�, L � ¢`•'d uE L qrb^ ^Hpd `� • V A S • Nb N b y 2> ,• d b y A y� 0 ~ O L d a y N y �y O L u � N y.>.b •dNq d N� 9 � „b.,w CO d pL YVY.Y V`Vy AE'« c' L d G � N N^ L .� L .m• O d y. A ^^ A L a W y y A 6 v C Y ^u6 CyL b Cbd Aa• A 0.0 ;GM N^ DYO b.C..C. ° ua .-�. «° dY o's�CO. i. nf`�a �q .!!.2 FN pIL o4Y> Y ar b NQ G«L C ^mow dt Nb 6rg iiz L acerb• Uy �.0 A y.CC bA `N y'q� may° 3C �° °f pC TdA. py L.d^ u 0.0 O'.b'd 6N p01 YdYL•n iUnNy. Aa > CE N•�.0.LV gg Nq1 ■■ ^LO NyT6 at ^'•'�a r•YO t H� XOH �Y .�.>. a1i7Nb 119G OAM6 Gda +� LY.00L C ,CL6 Xd LL •000 t« N p Q' q r• q� y .y' b N N 6 N '6 V oA ,I M O Z aJ v m .Q L d a q a O Tn. ajda OL�� c O c p As Vim. 9 b uf-a y p R O w y. E`AL Uro C.�A .E r qL. CL v0= QU E9 iNd..� V0.Y CCAN � Ot p�m mcon qn » oa «`d. pELE•C �3qq�. �Ult a d 4�0 OY rni Cum L mid p„ bd C= c M c0.'^ wFa> M d -.e U6 79 r L �p iT La' pn.- mugs NFY u °ic^ ,r q .du u S >� v c � L m •a nL EL d�Y E.HCp X00 604 L L na d i` p O ;5,Z A a q a O Tn. ajda OL�� ^L .`E�E Ld E`AL Uro • C n�.Y iNd..� V0.Y CCAN � Ot b• qn a d q^ mYa 4 u« .- rni Cum L mid YA .°..•u ra �i m� d LL.•.� ad �. u< m -BE ^ 4 91 r N _ 4' r8 G C L =. V. �d 3 zV NU bNC dy tl q q d d uEq b Y C atli 6q� U d N m d. i a pU+^• C I-VW L O I{ S 6�6 Yd. U 14 �^q{Fp M V1 .^ r 6 V 0 O.L CV{��� �6 U ^� ado �G •.L« qd UA� 4aa Lc _ p�LY - .yY rn�a « d3 as ` Na .v,a °r S LL a ua uo'm° —yy. q p� c E� MN •o•^ cA me u u T ti q C y • q a b a 0' N q � Y' N u rig N O 6 9�2 VM u LpNp cY �nbY vrN dq �r�L t Uq 6N u C G c � M, z-o. d« L ' 06 WW =.rYV ` -=?ray 'p U L - PLL L.c EOpG�Ey L d P O L C V+ E ac n. _ Nb 1 Nd Vi. N Ste^ J le- C r b 4Cm C11 N V WW W ET• 6YYV Q Ll M o o y o a N c.u° � � nu r nO 060 �Y�u.NA y.GE 2 O E >yN.. C u a dTG�GO e 4..1 VA PTO ^Y �'v C1 L •n Cw`"� ��� G E^ c U t _00 9 0 a o Cl. uON• EE T WwC ^AV �du o L E >u0 yTA r 'Er y E a v r c d U C G d i A O L G S O p C M, 0 N N U A •• A p i ILOdY 40.. €UO aA = rt AT O �6 •u 1� �. c V il• G O 1. C T ol v d a� t p✓ . LCNai �• ^E ac � mp to 2a uvLmn G C •- i) Uy U ^. CJ- O L A 6 d6NG1. C T N A YGd d.a Gq L. .dam CE N Y CY Q CM^'•p 9Z Ake L O L N v^ C C a GY u L.Y'•n y.r Y a c 54 q A A q E O Q 9 m ipJ 1� U n a q ti QaTJ C �.M C N. A' 9D UOm C N U. d v 2 �f,N EC 3 N a p ^ N^ n A Q V O L O pp j A C p 0 U> UQ a U N N y A S C ` 9 yy p= 0 o N G OpyY pLLgY L Nc0^ .�U _9 nV N� nu ai ^N ,C NO�yC SON N Lp'O'Zp L. 1 a A I E LQ N L O UFO u p -M ^ C n ^ N� � L A O < p A g dz GU2 yy 9 9 ^ C Y U C. d^ 9 a T N T ° Y t ~ 6 .-. OI •� ^ L p r 0 U A yp C N O O C E N_ Cy9 GE po •9 yY. T'p d4 AO ay ]Y C' 6y yam. rUUa�M C L. Off✓ O� V d. N E�/n a N N L^ S. V N O N H l :N C G F C 69 • :q N C€ M U w y n p 4 A Y V i U L N 6 n YA9; O > O OO •N 2 #E. � N L WN YV �@I S l7�L.S 4M 6.O 6 IL••O 4 '9 y' -a9 o NL o =�L a�wd V y A N L Y d 0 as � Y coo s ° Yp n�c r qdT uc `o YOo o f" c q d end u � oma Y � 6LV D ;, -1 O N y G y Y L t Q + 0 0 Ot A D b t o ay Y O O d Y t Y d tea. 'u u Z �V ayYiG2 N V.L. c r dp�u L C 4.. 7 iNT C ..0 rN49y N C G 4J ` L •N. -2-- n L qi fTC C« E c m a u j O � d Nin q 6�j a9N �L Ed Ems' L 3 NEy^ CL a N p LTa '^coos om« urn �°d_ Y v ai a+ L a �I IzI N'pi LWY 6U O.� �uN LU SD fdii ti q yd. V) o NL o =�L a�wd V y A N L Y d 0 as � Y coo s ° Yp n�c r qdT uc `o YOo o f" c q d end u � oma Y � 6LV D ;, -1 O 1 n 6 • dt C C V OI � OIM Ya � y t� _C y'. Y v Y� p Nn V 3� Mimi C2 Y• ^t � OS.2 1..: �� •+ OC �qL O 2•• C9d OP N° Gm d 'V ML �� LO ay' ,U � L � • °1 }90..� °Y JMO- Y v d d E V t o c V Y 0 A L O' u C� NO L A T q L qt n d+0• .�..d•n S^U' ^ � L I L L O y • C �,,. t. ^ C• OAT V AO: V N.' '.b:. -u g:; aQ Y9 Y U qSN Ol 1: D C �d OU > oa0 E q V••• Y L aL V L'yy •� L _� � G O D•d <G d+°+ 1 HC f <qUa Alk O O; 10 y O N = L. No Lzu °Da "5 =i^- o �YY O� c ^ 6ti O q•0 V y .+ qoL L nd q c o L J Y r �•> •^ -•pis 2 Le 'n q +- s I V .. •. O � 6. ° q u t. ' L ' V � G L 6 a L G V •.. 1r � r ° D O.0 Oy� b T� 1� W � W 9 LL O �O+• d n d G d. O.. Ca. D. Yu on L E Q•.q„ uin9. UO V wu tN O L'N Vui. n� -� '•O•ji �� Y+ DV. `a a I'•V 66.. Ji.O vSr 1-•.� K= ti 1 n 6 nv. 5-1- 71 /1TTY9 f1T A � iT/1TT/i r. �\ I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Master Plan and Site Plan, elevations for buildings A, E, and F, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Construction of buildings A, E, and F. C. Existing Land Use: Vacant and an existing Industrial Building Inspiron . D. Surrounding Land Use and Zonings North - Industrial and business {lark; General Industrial South - Single Family Residence, new industrial construction; General Industrial East - School, Residential; Low Residential District 2 -4 du /ac, Medium Residential District a -14 du /ac West Industrial, General Industrial E. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial' North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East Low Residential and Medium Density Residential West - General Industrial ITEM K - - V111 Vl' lYF 1l AAW VU IJZUTA%J 1LN STAFF REPORT � r Q) C Fj U '> DATE: September 11, 1985 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, Community Development Director Bv: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -14 - MULLER - The development of 3 office buildings totaling 53,226 sr-Are feet and 4 industrial buildings totaling 159,704 square feet within an existing industrial site that has an existing 148,000 square foot manufacturing industrial building on 18.42 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3), located at the northwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 209 - 021 -5, 16, 17. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Master Plan and Site Plan, elevations for buildings A, E, and F, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Construction of buildings A, E, and F. C. Existing Land Use: Vacant and an existing Industrial Building Inspiron . D. Surrounding Land Use and Zonings North - Industrial and business {lark; General Industrial South - Single Family Residence, new industrial construction; General Industrial East - School, Residential; Low Residential District 2 -4 du /ac, Medium Residential District a -14 du /ac West Industrial, General Industrial E. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial' North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East Low Residential and Medium Density Residential West - General Industrial ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSION S`iAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 85-14 - Muller September 11, 1985 Page #2 ah F. Site Characteristics: Site contains the existing Inspiron manufacturing and warehouse industrial building, and- the remaining portion is vacant and rough graded. The developed portion contains many mature trees that are worthy of preservation. G. Applira6le Regulations: The proposed R and D /Manufacturing use is permitted in the General Industrial (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Speci"Ic Plan. Office uses require a Conditional Use Permit to be approved by the Planning Commission. II. ANALYSIS: I A. General: The eastern portion of the proposed project consists of three office buildings, buildings E, F and G, which front a.ong Archibald Avenue and provide screening for the entire Inspiron facility. The westeen pc ^tion of this pr Mosed project consists of four R and C /Manufacturing buildings, buildings A, B, C and D. At thiv time, the developer is proposing to construct Phase I which include Buildings A, E, F. Plaza areas have been provided throughout the site w�:'h pedestrian linkages. The proposed elevations feature concrete panels, color accents, dark bronze anodized windows and enhances entrance statements. Exhibit "A ", attached for your review, is a color photo showing a perspective view of this project. Further, the developer is proposing to upgrade the existing Inspiron facility by repainting the building to compliment the new color scheme and provide screening for the roof mounted equipment.. Also, the existing storage tanks will be removed. Access to this project will be provided from Archibald Avenue and 9f` aet, where truck traffic will be using the two westerly Lelveways on 9th Street. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee has reviewed the project and found that the overall site plan with its building orientation, style of architecture, plaza area and location of parking area, complies with the Industrial Specific Plan. The Committee has recommended approval of the project provided that the following improvements be' made which the developer has agreed to: 1. Provide special landscape entrance statement to the corner of 9th Street and Archibald and the two driveways on 9th Street. 'A bftk PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 85 -14 - Muller September 11, 1985 Page #3 2. The plaza areas shall be pr,.1ded with pedestrian oriented fa- "lities such as shaded seating areas with attractive landscaping, kiosks, benches, trash - eceptacles and other streer furniture. 3. Provide undulating mounding along lrchibald Avenue to soften the continuous 2 foot required flood wall for flood protection purpose. C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and has identified one adverse environmental impact. The development of this project may expose people or property to water related hazards, such as flooding. A hydrology study recommends a two foot wall along Archibald Avenue as a mitigation measure. The existing portion of the site is extensively land.caped and new development would destroy a large number of mature trees. Staff recommends preservation or relocation of existing trees as a mitigation measure. Based upon this review, Staff has determined that there would not be such signeficant impact in this case, because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project and the Conditions of Approval. IF the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The �.•oject is consistent with the General Plan an this Industrial Specific Plan. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will not expose people or property to flooding, or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, building design, site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the Industrial Specific Plan and all applicable provisions of the City standard. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper and public hearing notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider all material and input regarding this project. If the Commission concurs with the findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration and Approval of Conditional UsP Permit 85 -14, through the adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval, would be in order. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 85 -44 - Muller September 11, 1485 Page 0 Respectfully submitted, Jack Lam Community Development Director JC:NF:cv Attachments: Color Photo - A Perspective View (P.C. packets .,sly) Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map. Exhibit "C " - Phasing Plan Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Exhibit "F" - Changes to Parking Area Adjacent to Bldg. D Exhibit "G" - Conceptual Landscape Exhibit "H" Plaza Area Exhibit "I" - Elevations Exhibit "J - Upgrade of Inspiron Building Initial Study - Part II and Addendum Resolution of Approval with Conditions q I" L1, s e omm'm Center NORTH Crry OF r I 7CHO E CU TONGA T: P LAIVI'IINU DIVIRON EXHIBIT: SCALE - . i RMUTILIZAMN MAP TECN G HO Y CENTER DIN f W &tA i". F NORTH CITY OF ITEM: T 0 CUC 0 R--NCH AM INGA TITLE-.- �G DlVb N NNIN SCAUi--- ML r^ s 4 ' '�:� :f���� °`� �• _- _- .._,_.,.:.,..rte •.� .�:'s � • �,; ::fit - t I � � � .�._��:! •`.rg;•' �.y,- r- :....,..._. y.;_ ,� -. Ifni � a:• • •:•: <.- ''` :irk :•x <•' >'` :'''`''� 4' �' � � i y s E= h t- u� a SnNSAW AS* jfj I TO `S. -_� � — 1 .r• I — � L. / pry` i r R• ° S f MM 9 r . f' 4f R ► �� . . .1" j; ul rw I E-71 VIEW 1 ~ ,� � F = -- 'rte,•= -_ °_ = k � �� _." �� � t s w ,o...c L... l „�317H3A n o i II S , ice,! rf na I Ia }if: I +• •`r 1,1 S 1 t of LLL 1W , je ♦ A. 1 a t i t9 11 1 I E — 1J I F - Jd _.J ►nom rrrr:.3.....333 K��7 Its'” �- ` j 1 g, • .. � � > ' -�tMr T x�,=M.1t•�t�T,,,a �, `ct �.a '��I � rT . t ! r i \ ` k + •!' rf �._ . •�~ to 'r k � t I . 1 ' n o i II S , ice,! rf na I Ia }if: I +• •`r 1,1 S 1 t of LLL 1W , je ♦ A. 1 a t i t9 11 1 I E — 1J I F - Jd _.J ►nom rrrr:.3.....333 K��7 Its'” �- ` j 1 g, • .. � � > ' -�tMr T x�,=M.1t•�t�T,,,a �, `ct �.a '��I � rT . t ! 1r ri 4 -» ,r .;F v f t e . �tE tl ►f j } t • � I NORTH CITY OF rfEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TfTLE: ��,��, PLANNINU DIVIS_TUN EXHIBIT' SCALE- -\O 8 � .' rT ON Aft oo p I , V.- �. CAMO"Tw. yr. MAU COMCEPT Em fl� NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: - �► PLAIVNII\TG DIVLSION EXH1BtT- SCALE, 1 'w� i 1- t- 2' a a S w J w N d OJ Z Q a w J W y f (' i r ij g.. H � W J J 3 z ay j gs 3 .s F f (' i r ij g.. H � W J J 3 z ay j gs 3 ■ A p S F# i ■ .� Al o i la f� r A II i t� t Z 2 0 0 W W 4 J W .2 q ID w -0 FU k-\s it W` dc w CU t. FU k-\s it -------------------- onol if Ll xx !-LILA' V- -ice C CITY OF RANCHO CUCA)iONGA PART II — INITIAL. STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE:__ APPLICANT: FILING DATE 4'•26 —g"r LOG NIRIBF —N: ,jaj PW`)r4,S PROJECT:3 Qrff�CE ISLa& r �j �,2zC cA d 0iiThk` At- +�- S 7dii7LttiG /59�7�»t PROJECT LOCATION;_ I. ENVIROMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" anvers are required on attached she __s)_ 1. Soils and Gflnlol.'V. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c. .Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. AAY Potential increase in Grind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud - slides, ground failure, or•similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /rte -. use of any mineral resource? 2. Eydrolo¢y. Will the proposal have significant results in: YES MAYBE NO Page 2. YES ;MAYBE �p a. Changes in current,, or the course of direction flexing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattern^ or the rate and ve amount of surfa Y ce water 'unaf f ? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? - d. Change in the amount of surface water in anv✓ body of water? / e. Discharge into surface wa.ers o _ alteration any ration of su•: €ace water quality? • / f- Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with aquifer? an Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? i- Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding j or seiches? - V 3. Ais _alit - Will the proposal have s_gnificant =esatts in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? .._. b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or s Interference `� With the attainment of applicable air quality standards? e. Alteration of local or regional climatic V conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? G. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results U-7— a- Chanz: in the characteristics of species,_ including diversity, distribution, oz: number Of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? Page 3 i%p "t c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of V plants into an area? d. Reducti-n in the potential for agricultural production? ,- Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant results ` in, a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? —� c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? �- d. Deterioration or removal of existing sish or wildlife habitat? f 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: Alk a. Will tine proposal alter the location, 33stri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate cf the human population of an area? s b. Will the proposal affect_ existing housing, or c_eate a demand for additional housing? _ 6. Socio- r:onomic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, iz.Ovding economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries* 4.e., buyers, 'tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Plannine Considerations. Will the - proposal have significant .results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? o. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c, An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of ex;As a ng consumptive or non - consumptive ',Z recreational opportunit'.es? Y- i A Page 4 YES ;SAY9E` N0 8, Transportation. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? C. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new , parking? d. _ Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion o2 movement of people and /or goods? f, Alterations to or effects on present and potential water - borne, rail, mass transit or air. traffic? V g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 4. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, / paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. Health, Safety, and Neisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creatirn of any health hazard or potential. health hazard? / \/ b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? C. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? Vf e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exynsure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? —_— g. The creation or ob, actionable odors? h. An. increase in light or glare? �( Page 5 31. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant YES :LaFBE NO .results inc €. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? vvv b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated r or potential scenic corridors? f 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal -- have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a Electric power? f b. Natural or packaged gas? �_ f C. Communications systems? f d. Water supply? Aftr e. Wastewater facilities? it Ip f. Flood control structures? S. Solid waste facilities? ✓/ i h. Fire protection? f i. Police protection? j. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? t 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? 13. Enerev and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal _1 hav7- ignificant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing / sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development of -- — / V/ new sources of energy? 4. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable frrms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? _ r Page 6 YES MAYBE NO e., Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural lAft resource? AN 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance; a. Does the project have the Potential to degrade the quality of tf,z environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rgre or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ..� �. Does the project have the potential to. achieve snort- term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future), C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects OZ past projects, and probable future % projects). ✓ d.• j *des the project have environmental effects / / i "nich will cause substantial adverse effects f� on human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION AF ENVIRON'NTPL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative the above questions plus a discussion of proposed aitigacic'r, answers tri measutes,,-; .: - • .. Page' 7 III. DETMILMINATIO*7 On the basis of this - initial evaluation: I find the proposed project DOL'LD NOT have a significant effect on the enviro=ent, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will b- prepared.` I find that although the proposed project Could have a significant effect on the envirom.ent, there will. not be a significant effect iI this case because '9Ie mitigation measures descr ;bed on an ` attached sheet have actin added to the project. A NEGATII DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. EDI find the proposed project %JAY e a s nifican^ z z n the envinment, and an ENVIRON,%MNT aCT REPOT is r fir Date --QQ nature Title i a e' t } 4 it ADDENDUM TO INITIAL STUDY, PART II FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 =14 - MULLER - 'i 2. Hydrology (b), 0). it The construction of this project will increase the `amount of paved `. surface area which could result in an incre;":= in.the amount of surface water runoff and a decrease in the absorption rates. e However, the proposed drainage systemf`fo�r this project will handle t this increase. The: - development of -the site could expose people and {" r property, especially downstream prorierties, to flooding. A preliminary hydrology report has been prepared which requires the construction of a 2 foot flood wail''along Archibald Avenue as a flood protectinn mitigation meacx&'e. (This is added to the project.) 8. Transportation (a) The development of this project will cause an increase in vehicular traffic, however, Archibald Avenue .nd 9th Street are designed to handle such an increase. .t • e RFSOLUTIjIN NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85 -14 FOR A MASTER PLAN AND PHASE I OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF 3 OFFICE BUIL -OINGS TOTALING 53,226 ;SQUARE FEET AND 4 INDUSTRIAL 'BUILDINGS TOTALING 159,704! SQUARE FEET, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 9TH SThEET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE IN '(HE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL. DISTr ICT WHEREAS, on the 21st day of June, 1985, a complete application- was filed by the Muller Company for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of September, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and City Standards. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment based upon the mitigation measures required for flood protection and that a Negative Declaration is issued on September 11, 1985. SECTION 3: That Cond'isional Use Permit No. 85 -14 is approved subject to th—" — Sowing conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The Master Plan is approved in concept only and future development of subsequent phases shall be subject to Design Review process for Planning Commission approval. Modifications to the Master Plan shall. be subject to Planning Commission approval. Resolution No. CUP 85 -14 - Muller September 11, 1985 Page 2 2. The parking area and circulation south of Building D shall be redesigned as shown in Exhibit "F 1. The projects landscaping shall have a unifying theme, including- f;pecial landscaping treatment at the corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue, the driveway entrance on 9th Street, and along Archibald Avenue. The special landscape treatment shall be designed to accentuate architecture of the project. 4. Undulating mounding per Industrial Specific Plan standards shall be provided along Archibald Avenue to soften the look of the required 2 foot flood wall. Details of the mounding shall be reflected in the grading plan and detailed_ landscape plan. 5. Landscaping islands with a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet shall be provided every seven stalls for shading of pavement areas. 6. The existing manufacturing /warehouse building - Inspiron Facility, shall be rerainted to compliment the new color scheme, and screening for the roof mounted equipment shall be provided. 7. All existing storage tanks, and other tanks, shall be removed with the completion of Phase I of this project. 8. The plaza area shall be provided with pedestrian amenities such as shaded seating areas, kiosks, benches, trash receptacles, and other street furniture. 9. Existing trPas shall be preserved in place wherever possible or shall be relocated elsewhere on -site for preservation. A written report from a qualified landscape architect or tree arborist shall verify the details of preservation or relocation. Any trees that cannot be transplanted shall be replaced in kind with mature specimens. The written report shall be submitted together with a Tree Removal Permit pursuant to Ordinance 37 and a detailed plan showing existing trees and relocation/replacement. 10. All trees to be saved shall be encloced by a chain link fence prior to the issuance of any grading or bui'3ing permit and prior to commencement of work. Fences are to remain in place daring all phases of construction and cannot be removed without the written consent of the City Planner until construction is complete. 0 El Resolution No _ CUP 85 -14 - Mdller September 11,,, '1985 Page 3 i ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. One driveway will be allowed on Archibald Avenue. It shall be designed with the existing school driveway as shown on the revised site plan. 2. A lot merger to combine the existing parcels on the site into, one parcel shall be completed prior to the .. - issuance of building permits. 3. Notice of Intent to join b `\proposed median island landscape district shall be,_ tiled with= +:City Council prior to building permit issuance. 4. The existing drive approach on Archibald Avenue shall be removed. 5. Flood protection measures shall be provided along F Archibald Avenue generally as shown on_ the revised` grading plan. The actual design shall -'be based on final flooding report as approved by the City Engineer. 6. A final flood stciy shall bE provided and submitted to Engineering Division for review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. E 7. Meandering sidewalk shall be provided within the right -of -way along Archibald Avenue. Landscaping shall be provided between the meandering sidewalk and the required flood wall. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANL,tj CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Jack Lam, Secretary it Resolution No. CUR 8b -14 - Muller September 11, 1985 Page 4 I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the P %tinning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify tr;at the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of September, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit: r AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: CONNISSIOWRS: �p P I WL I Y S W O w O 6 Z K D F. 6 d U N < J = 4..0 d G za- �.� �NNO VG LU6 O.0 a U�Mq .M�y. •E q0O u O�AL.T OL�Oa RE bC GG'UO2TC N pipp cY U otlY 3`� a° 4 ^ iypaNt Ypi ygE6 E. C A • OWN S M N h >� pey L� q Y y y96 _ Gda Zed <Y p �'uY° <� Esc uYU _ 1^ •q^L�Y< n"aoyNE fi n V' Y ^t awL° -nee a CL O =v.0 SE C.1. Co ^ {'TrYi � EE 5.�. b So VYYO q d0 dAG N'L L Up6 C 9 M YN V„T i ore a ^a Y ° M �YAY7 Yr�uYa g v Y A. d s '°^ t'°'n °odw` o^ m •y Y� G oN °' Yi °ooh v_a <L.. A O _ n 4.. M u6 a Vy AOgLd�N Q � 011= a A' N y^ tl G GOV~n •� EO nCn�� qT fi' auO� N�� o. m Y �NLa .S Y Y^ 'aY a�� CuN nqr c�� c. �^.yq'9i oCuo >1 N 5 na o AO Y CAA L � NGC E q tC q pCYL yyGN a Y E 'C E UU 6ND C YU Zm d< .� .0 yy E d -- T Y� dY GCS �t°i {,,� v N \\j i p Y F Y N Y. w.Cw E O O O S. r ad.' pe ML <YYNN�U �p P I WL I Y S W O w O 6 Z K D F. 6 d U N < J = 4..0 d G M7o A iTY LO OL. al RE bC � � LN N N S FY9N0 O..0 u grn • OWN S M N h >� pey L� q Sdp � d�V ` .GgO•CY v qdC 4Fi J =v.0 w uu,��a+ apt YN ^N li. Y QGYY V YQ A O NNY N' r� Vy AOgLd�N Q � DOE. 2 Y L 2� LC`3 NN ^d a Aa q W O. l C �M qO UG�^rC�nu6 {,,� d p Y F Y N Y. w.Cw E O O O S. r ad.' pe ML <YYNN�U L -go Y npp. .p i x pn .2 at! �c N w.~r J H N In <I tIf �pcY Y'n nL _o t'u �o.. N^ mW Npp4u uGL'^i "da"+i I P��y ^ Y °Y �Pw a y' 1LM gyAw N� �C�CO Ny ql ' {�.N NGO OC 1V C ^Y.� M �'pw c6G wYq. ~.c DauY tEr 4Z4 _o � Y 1po°n �YaiY° oaLi�� '.. «Yb e= q2°�L dYA �YV w.6 wY dN�q qd Y��EOui. L4'c^�� Q > +C Y.N. L >Yd L. O 9yL WC �GOywp N y�PCWJ -w 11.12-o .rc ^y LO LO ^' L aYp w.dC ^r 9V ^CV.>pN4 q9Z -�N °Y Yn.. %q.^Y.VD G wEgLq '. qc L9 Nr Nye ^u�.P.. LAW wL wC«` wC7 ^a NMcL �C "> w4 a wY Lc °Y a° ° o°E >"'�cy N�ua Nom. U myLY 4� E 'L' c= v°,D.G �� Ld9 9y1�yy u)c .o G N V ^d O I J 72 aay r'O y CV -. Sj9M��L ^wYy COY N6C p IL-.Ty 0 .-. R E t ° T'y c O L w d` g U w^ q. V w Ow uGv LY C. ^: L ggCC oL dq CC> Oya Nu wb wi4o�� u u. uL -.ham �...« u� u °o 4Y un uu6 °v�°n <n nLn +4 1�L NCw C�NP N,,5- . k - 3o ^O2t c cn.wa c }Q�iO�±. paic d d ^a b�a4 r" c= ^ X w o o° I I q" °NGw P u�yP p L+r�6�i n n „L NA a^ ° P.a L Y N d uyyyyy N a � a ab„ G GNr u° owoc. -° v Q. � q=zc wL .a q qw u uFCGU�w ° �i a °p d •O NON ^ ud•-.. aN u °yT -T' � a ° _ w q C Y '� �rr wq Gb^ • Y OL V E GE¢.V � �PMbc C9�9w 43U�.L�O.Zb � �^rr NNy• -O N�V° L L@ wC °d 4O A Ali bnz ` �aN.9 E E dcw A Gd N N +.w L yY° Z a 17. .yr nY w a ti t pp . N 6 V N Y Y Y w Y:' . .� u i n ' Gc°c og; A aT� 4-Z w w 04 N��l w.b c cUN ^w L� w 2.2 N f e S L 6 p p o w m oy Z Z2. LY ^ V 6 F= > p!.- :C .G� N 9 Y 41L a aO Et ,H ° ° E 9 Yq MC V Yy^ C C yyS�wY o j^PCw b b NUM' k - 3o a0 ' CO -O .y 0. �5Z Gy C i :4Y c C U A T tdeY^A tl. Yn q= qd ^.^ -.Oi o ~�•-•~ _Uy� CVtiv NYn �• u U� d0 POP Da 7N� ^_L uLb� u q'CL Psq. -o �t p� ^ddoA O..... >.°.MU a.L O'i «• vim.°.. LL v cY ^ L qY o QiuY N .°c uN NC�„ V P SL G mob' °NY�d U dG^ qtl^ ^a'•�.N. G9 N w °^ V 'n. .i Pq Oy NZM� nj. n C O.q Ntl a N'ca 0 9 0 0 6= A L C N y e R y D^ s .-• �• N O C ° � d t '..ydµ. �E q'�' vvalo yp y'ou°� ,•6 u��. oNygG zz G °« y O @ p tl Ny O K N P P a o.qN YCCnYU ° I ON Y� U Oq V - PGN up' V OgHQayi a°ic V! C GwP Hm � °M x ^.r `� Po �.^.. a�Y .-_' a •.� .•.ti _ i d 2~ O .JT..G .[. N Y p a O L L° U d 9 V 'G-P a aGi .. ° g e O of C �cP_a 0 ^a GL t ° 4 w u O. 'N$ NQipn �« 2 $si Zy.L C$ ru � nc� wiA q.YU° yN^ ,t..^ Bq y^ vv. yqT> a qL �dt2 q y G ''Otl C G q q 0 0 L 4 L u 6 q d T g N o 0 7 w- .0-0 66= AEL C VY uE 0°G qC.' uY n «p gOCy9 agOs ^ G N� r q Yu N y Y «�q uY 6Q O•'� L t. td ? vd u^ C C U C y O N n n q � .NU5 H'O �t 6• G L uP 9 p q n~ u V qq N^ ,� u � Y «d .G. qCa q Yq C.GL ^NgLW nag 09 D y SZ` 20 p� �Q YN NT 'ou °o. oeoY gatl «'� P Nqi.�.- ...^a t�°•- ,_�'4 .+`a u. °� \7CM L �i Ll S. 0♦ N = � 6 O r N t N V r L >, PNy L t O qvL a Y�E r qNs Y l 0 n D`C u�a c t c =^ V M e V � G OT O V i .°o r O o �r��W 1"• NC Y♦+ �•Ni H N w L 0- YP 79 24 e it ge 4 L Y V Y Y n •+. y a y L V V C .o Y '� u W O L O ^ 0 0 °'L �y EV OrN J U"NU ~uV O aV O L @CcT AauQ O r huN W y6 Vv °6 OL u p 9� N C q'2.2 WVY . 4 x u qu O d �SAqu `tj 5 A-".9 tlb Y O u O° O Y ` L Y q'4 '4-1- A Y dy -C V � 9 •Y J uV u � a_�ym �•U ^Z � rq �m.�`o qoY o sur. +♦ cq uT ai vgvYi �w . N CyN .°ua C pu VVW jL♦s^ W _ G e Y �i' NOW y.I YM �Cqq .qua+ > r ll�Y NV V...O °L� Wu Yq itss qry P�9u4 •. �a� °t♦tJ <� -� F q•e: Oo '.-ve M& Y Y aav 1L ��^ '^.yY.o `q uLY q o0 NEO �v .N.V �d �N . 'V; s c cE L laI V 'a LO i0 .� Y o Mµj `NLL LCTY ' Y CC °GvK ni °d0 c -nzq uGn _ Ai F a�na'Y r. r W q u t tl' �.+ L a0♦ y q C V P V OI a+ y C Oyq+•.°. H L V "E ii P' O �- O Oqq oNU •+ O�N �' N'L LT _ C Y.0 tq °uC '9Y0 v g4mr N° °'\'t'O� pt y w t u. � 4 O 1 a M� � hp q• L 6.^ y +C W L G O \. �q M NYC G _ qL O o� cc N= a O Z 6N LC J bCN 1•.M6V N O° p ` P� L VOA < 4 <tL Cf GVNwN• 1� WVO. WHR 6W•+{� - C Ul H �I c ! q V � v^ w A Ny a �qv C Cg A .. M 96 ♦ y Y Y G C d tiV n Ny `69E `t 'sy C N c cp q Y N C L * T 52 r W q u t tl' �.+ L a0♦ y q C V P V OI a+ y C Oyq+•.°. H L V "E ii P' O �- O Oqq oNU •+ O�N �' N'L LT _ C Y.0 tq °uC '9Y0 v g4mr N° °'\'t'O� pt y w t u. � 4 O 1 a M� � hp q• L 6.^ y +C W L G O \. �q M NYC G _ qL O o� cc N= a O Z 6N LC J bCN 1•.M6V N O° p ` P� L VOA < 4 <tL Cf GVNwN• 1� WVO. WHR 6W•+{� - C Ul H �I • LOO q0 "�� NQY t t � Y NJa.0 ^u°i E. N « q u u ^ 9 -. �r°•E. N.d�rb d � �rn •`�N YE °dk d ` N d ^C 06° a Cty «tq wdC= LC i a Et; o'r �iN w> avi w. " � � y d N o��� t � qES � d � d • zi C v E o v s c _ gC �p d p C yn�G6� E6_ • 20 c �a N y d M 4. 9� A� M Y M A T C� � O. G E V n q• gaVY aVYq BE pq Y y 6 Mw Kb C O q4 U d u Lt N O •• L C 1 pOL y + C EEp EE C I rp 1 u CUE D a u yy�LN J 1 Y � Y O♦ C C4i AM V? « c� V dim E S a°i ^ v E rn A d L O« -1:2 .v- o YN N 79 e C' -2 Ma S. a0 4C qr Cf U L °NOW L�.�yU aq y rn N 00. d M � U d.q q CS V\. N u LO Z C y d C i0 Y aj� V ^y `Y nV a ML w °9 ° ON �v 4y GO y' O N.O LC yy •, a., n Ya a °o v = ^c un NL 'O� c �v °p^L"°.A dgomq a CO �icor ° «L 9Cwq d v � YYY "'e c° as dam. N d .qcY 'ti v� oc ._.oq Nq a d�aT Wd a-dis �u V vrq � o �•O1 Is q NTa �u ��v �d vY �rn • a d o M >'� H C O 6i • tl Y� U V nV E •., C �� ' N c G d 0 }- d� m �Wc pp ° 6 E€ ° yy 4 d V ^_° � L pp ° . &-; � �` - N V q N i � .2VE . C 2q •N Yr N N e1 p• dN 9q > D t O •i °p NET'y Y yN^ .N G iDJ•S D S -- KO 4 V r0K q a', u i; 1 to t c 4J �.a .O Q I i. fh. aio u"a'. L d >�� y o L NbL lC V��! O tl 9 c L U N O a F N V LE N .•di ,+ .5 c U Y A O = LL 9 dgOa ru tE. 3` N = Y q.CO 6 M Y L L1• r odpL 4.� aq N � •q � S wANO V d ucyu Ma r d o� air^.,• .°d. G Y b V '� W c •• c C 4 Ye V 4 y N d'C^aC 7i. 0, LGG CC cV O. YV L CA�D.1dn` V1ip LQrq 7 Nw y�A.'!� D1ngN Aid^ •� E.a•q OU a.O L�tl d ^y ` 7; 4: LNx.. cu i.•. :ty °NC as .±N adau a ^S a tV k 'C� A�Md Nip L L.V •� �~ ^y2 O (•� «;ud 'ate ^.yq :;p ��'• °Ad caF1 $ � i 6N =EN dd�V r L7 LNE+�tc W EdE a C u E y~ G c.L N tl L Y L dr. L L a fl�A La dC�~ =0'd Gd ey L�ni6 y O d M 4 i V V Y a s •^,.. Orn qpat dd NyA y� A �L 7•^ L d+� ,Le rc.� Nu^'� EN rs� _ •'^ uV.o 'a y c� E o 4pM0 b V9 Q III II� W A� y V a�OO '• C � ✓ d C L u d« c N u q d V 9• a N a �y,iV L� bN dm U N O L U A O+ dNq q6 E 'yam yE p= � < N 6 cqud y o V - -- wy .• v d c +y M N .a c G Q d y q tl V '0 0 V O• d �1+ A n 2 E V d � c o^ a o NMa ay N � Td C6D ^9 d Ca �M. O .tea 6.CaC c 35 +a �q y >c� `s° ono. od o oa ^. 0 P 4 w vL..- MTc Na <- ^ O• 'd=c N d O q cE sc s k -3y O O y pC d C hW L _ o L a .yi•i L W Z'S Yp v G u ^aG aGL n y L 6 d61 n•'r� O t y a N Y d F: Ear p E W.Q N O r C a 'y tld L c d S c N 9 r T d L W C O 1 u 4 5 L].-- a e^ ai a m • o= « C � T9 d L • ° a d O N9 S.. v 'ri b s dO Od N.G yL V NG dq « L Od qY .i+rn go u DAY oQ a`h — AI p « o uo °° Ni cq 3 ^ y a 2 < O19 �, NO Lu.°.• Lq y . • a'a � S N L u qy E u S^. o a p ggz� ° G >q u � v' c n i u. c •o� ¢ �+ r 4-12 > > 41. 1-h O 6 1 l u O q 91 ` et S. b�N M C q- ° � • Y N a c °e�.•i °m N ° M �L O y Y« NM ti Z T t L a qU .•. �•- Cn E. `. q`p9 :5 � Y Q —p`G S L Yq aTi� ^ Y E « N T L p S OE y e> c LL �i �: f� c .a 1:5 w N O a n O L t 9 ° cT NC p A59 tT_•• O` 'O A O ' L 4 � C °• ° L L • C.•' « ^PYi4YC n9 Cn GC� y >d S OW W'N LL S 0 '<N � N In U OIJ A .. f-i.« anN .Yiio o • '..Q'i- i-.t+ <« <s \ 1H !, I.- - DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT September 11, 1985 Panning Commission Barry R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer corner of Haven Avenue and Goo CAM���-�. t a a � r Q Q >. 77 1977 uu ur -t-2.o4 tcres,inw 5 parcels in barea 6) located on the northeast Street - PAN 210 -091- 1,2,3, and 16 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. A Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map. B. P Purpose: To divide 43.88 gross acres of land i into 5 parcels for n ustria2 "ark purposes. C. L Location: Northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4 4th Streef. D. P Parcel Size: Parcel i - 5.70 net acres. Parcel 4 4 - 8.49 net acres Parcel 2 - 6.38 net acres Parcel 5 5 - 6.91 net acres Parcel 3 - 10.35 net acres E. E Existing Zonin : Industrial Park, Subarea 6 o of the Industrial specific Plan. F. E Existing Land Use: Vacant. G. S Surrounding Land Use: Nor - vacant. South - Vacant (City of Ontario). East - Industrial Building (General Dynamics). West - Vacant. H. S Surroundini General Plan and Development Code Designations: Nort - Industrial Park Su area 6). South - City of Ontario. East - Industrial Park (Subarea 12), U t I d t T us,ria Park (Subarea 6). I. Site Characteristics: The site contains an abandoned vineyard, some tries an grassess. It slopes approximately 3% from North to South. ITEM L `' - PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 9498 :eptember 11, 1985 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: This Parcel Map relates to D. R. 85 -31 and the Gateway Master Plan � hich are on tonight's agenda for consideration by the Planning Commission. The Parcel Map will subdivide the master plan into 5 relatively large parcels separated by interior public streets. The Developer has indicated that he intends to develop the parcels one at time in the order of the 'parcel numbers. THe first being D. R. 85 -31 located on Parcel 1. . Construction of the street and drainage improvements will be phased with the development of the individual parcels. The construction of the portion of the Haven Avenue median fronting the Parcel Map will be deferred until it can be constructed under a City Contract for a larger length io order to providr a unified landscaping theme. The Developer is required to make a cash deposit for the cost of one -half the median fronting the Parcel Map. The Developer has indicated that he disagrees with two of the conditions of approval. The first being Condition G.I. which states that the proposed texturized pavement used for pedestrian walkways shall not be used within the public street pavement. The Engi;-eprina- Division is opposed to its use for the following reasors: 1. It could give pedestrians an increased false sense of security when crossing the street, therefore exposing them to increased risk of being struck by vehicles, 1 7. The surface could become slippery when wet (water or oil) increasing the of falls. s 3. An irregular surface again could increase the incidence of tripping and falling espeeially for women wearing high heeis, the handicapped, and elderly. 4. It can trovide a rough ride for vehicles. 5. It is not as flexible as asphalt and could therefore settle differently causing a bump in the direction of vehicle travel. 6. It can become an increased maintenance expense for the City. 7. Future street repairs and utility trenching would be more difficult and expensive. 8. The City would be forced to stockpile sufficient amounts of r,the materials to make future repairs =, 'in the event that the manufacturers were to no longer prodYi a the material. L_. a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental; Assessment and Parcel Map 9498 September 11, 1985 Page l Aft `r The second being Condition G.7, which states that a medion opening at the north /south street between Haven Avenue and Utica on 4th Street will not be allowed when and if the median is constructed This condition is consistent with the access control policy of the Industrial Specific Plan which states that such openings shall be no closer than a one- quarter mile. The proposed opening would be approximated at one- eighth of a mile. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also.attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial+uStudy as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and r has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have teen sent to surrounding s property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached reso ution conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 9498 and authorizing the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, VV LBH:BK:jaa Attachments: Map - Vicinity Map - Tentative Resolution ` Recommended Conditions of Approval Initial Study ,,y allWillif ®�mmnm�i t i t 1 G _ MWC uNF J 1 MWD 4uP r i u 1 7t t ! W 1 y 1 1 ARROW II \�II 3lvp o� SS�•� {lllli�ll��i 'F �- 1� � � a � � 0111 W �ii sj�l 1tpp . ill !fit OH If111:11 i11h i {iii i 8 ' : �iiiiiiii+ �.• • SGNV9 llttai rONOrmm 22 1QS V 42 101 - .m..w OB 10'1 `s-- 4A vk ❑• _ r r A : i• C ''1. JI ��Ili•OI< ` � ` .lt i .+rn9wroo. Y i '` !t• ° iyt � i \ ,•. � _ r.� �- °�`:` r � I ' ., . i., '`• 3 1 = F i ��� © '� ,� , 1 �• 6 TJVd Ct'ctQ r�yyd i8 e nre s 'nrd�' ^1�j 1 WIY73�31!lLL�lO H39w11 11 'tlad���� •HVd LSIS 'ON '— dVW l3�llyd 1� � •• �"• ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATIuN o„ o Z INITIAL STUDY PART GENERAL For all proj_Lts requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning. Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Stcdy and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations; (1) The project will have no significant tavironmental impact and a' Negative Declaration wili ce filed, (2) The )ject will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report wrill.be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: Auaust 15, 1985 Project Title: Parcel Man - Gate-;av Plan Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: Reiter & Rinker Develosateit co. P.O., Box 7250, Newport Beach, CA 92658 -7250 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this_Project: Tim J. Beedle, Vice President, Planning & Design Mdress• Sam as above Location tf. Project. Northeast corner Haven Avenue and 4th Street l Assessor's Parcel No,: 210- 081 -01, 02, 03, and 16 List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federa incies and the agency issuing such permits:l�st s Plan, 1st Phase Plan PROJECT OESCRIP1AN Proposed use or proposed project: Parcei NLn for ; ict Subdivision Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: Proiect area 43.88 ac. No e� sting building, areas of --ding: FcotUrints 367,100 sq.ft. Area of gross building 827,750 Describe the environmental setting of the project site including information 'on topography, soil staD M FY,: plants (trees), lard animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): The site is essentially vacant and void of anv structures. Both Haven Avenue and 4th Street abut the site on the West and South nrooertv lines r:-esnec ively. The only sieni.ficant vegetation on site is a stand of trees _ located oncosite the centerline of Trader irk Avenue. The site is covered with an abandoned vinevard orchard. The 'Fite slones in a north -south direction anoroxinate1v 3% with an overall fall of annroximately 31 feet. The majority of the land surrou:riim the site is vacant with the except on of the General pynmaics processincr facility located southeast of the project. The soils report shows the site made up of alluvial deposits of uniform ooe%sLt -E y. _ Ground water was not encountered during the soil test. Is the' project part of a larger project, one of a series of rumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact The gateway Plan is a Master Plan for a series of s:aal.ler Projects to proceed subsequently for development. The enclosed expanded initial study is to provide inform -ation to address potential environmental issues in both the Master Plan and subsequent phases of development. I -2 WILL THIS PROJECT: "cS NO 1. Create a substantial Sanoe in ground contours? _ X Z. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? 3. Create a substantial charge in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan des`-tnations? _X S. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 61 Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials suc,'i as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? X Explanation of any.YES answers above (attach additional sheets if nei:essary): There is the potential that a significant portion of the existing stand of trees that :nay need to be remved. 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: Se *aae 58,000 cal /dav and solid waste 15 ton/day B. Estimate the number of auto and i pro ec-r 9020 tr rt;ck trips generated daily by this ips A. Estimate the.amount of grading (cutting and fillin )required for this project, in cubic ,yards: cutting and filling 80,000 cubic yards 10. If the project invalvas the construction of residential.units, rnmpla±� the "orm on the next page. CERTIFICIMA. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and �:orrect to the best of my know'iedge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be slibmittad before an adequate evaluation can be made by th Planning Division. REi xx*u D> PI<>: m., Date: 8/L`/85 5inea+e-ro �' P Title Vice P1-esdent - Flannina & L' b L -3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTIO3 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ' k RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER k 9498 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9498) LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND 4TH STREET WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9498 submitted by Reiter,. land Rinker Development Company and consisting of 5 parcels, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street, being a division of a portion of Lots 21, 28, and 29, Section 13, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, and San i Bernardino Base and Median, County of San Bernardino, State of California. R WHEREAS,., on August 19, 1935, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and 4, WHEREAS, on September 11, 1985, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan., 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on, abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environments impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on September 1% 1985. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 9498 is.approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. L-. Resolution No. Parcel Map No. 9498 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST. Jack Lam, Secretary 1, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutioq was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of th; Planning 'commission held on the 11th day of September, 1985, by the foTlowing vote -to -y, 4: r AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: \O 13 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDED CONL_TIONS OF APPROVAL ® LOCATION: Northeast corner of Haven Ave. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 0:- 9498 and 4th St. DATE FILED: August 19, 1985 LEGAL DESCREPTION :_a portion of Lots 21, 28, NUMBER OF LOTS: 5 and 29, Section 13 Township 1 South, Range GROSS ACREAGE: 43.86 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, ASSESSOR PARCEL NU: 210- 081 -1,2,3 County of San Bernardino, State of California & — kid.• 4++ 3.. LiAi. Lla1 .��...u.•._•..•..�_._....... .. .... . ' ' ' ' _ _ DEVELOPER O!RNER ENGINEER /SURVEYOR A. H. Reiter Development _ same__ K129 Iis- Stevens & Assor— 9650 Business Center Dr. 3111 Camino Del Rio North Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9.1730 San Suite Diego, CA 92.108 IGirovement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, butt may not be limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehiculat, Access X _ 1. Dedications shall ue r:ade of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication shall be made the following rights -of -way on the following streets (measured from street centerline): 27 tota° feet on Utica Ave. additional feet one addition,` feetorr X 3. Corner property Line radius will be required per City Standards. X 4. All -iahts of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: Haven Ave. and 4th St, except at approved locations, 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and Joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C. &R,s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. I Curb urb A.C. Side- 0,ive Street treet A.C. f•]e"� dean: Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk Appr Trees Lights Nerlay island* Other Hagen qve. •X X XX X X X 4th St. _ XX ,X X Utica Ave. X X X X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter XX Medndering r X 6. All existing easements lying within future right -cf -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per „ity Engineer's requirements. X 7. Easements for sidewalk along public streets shall be dedicated to the City, where such sidewalks encroach into private property. Surety X 1. Surety ;hall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of ti:�e City Engineer and City Attorney, guar;-iteeing completion of the public improvements prior to building permit issuance for individual parcels. X 24 A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map � fors ? following: median island on 4th street. X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of a34 on -site drainage facilites necessary .for jewatering 01 parcels to the satisfaction of the Euilding and Safety Oivison prior to issuance of building permit for the individual parcels. Street Improvements Pur .rant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16 ,6.120, the suHivider may into th Cit1 enter an agreement and post security with guaranteeing the required cunstruction prior to recordat,,n of the building map permit issuance. X 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees an! street lights on all interior streets. r _ X 2. A minimum of '26 -foot wide pavement within a '^ -foot wide Oedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half- section streets. i X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to Ltilding permit issuance for individual parcels. I Curb urb A.C. Side- 0,ive Street treet A.C. f•]e"� dean: Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk Appr Trees Lights Nerlay island* Other Hagen qve. •X X XX X X X 4th St. _ XX ,X X Utica Ave. X X X X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter XX Medndering i X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street im +rovement plans shall be prepared by a P,,gistered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 6.' Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be _ undergrounded. X &. Install appropriate, street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with ioca`ciuns and types approve.! by the City 'Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are tc be.approvrd by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Ranch:, r Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. Ask X :.p. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be sul 'r(l to and approved by tht Planning Division prior to + issuance of w building oerplit. X 11. Concerif.raied drainage flows shall not cross sideoialks, i Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. j DrajnRM and flood Control 1. private drainas_ ea, m,'onts for cr oss ; <lot drainage shall be required and shall'.- f, neat,i or noticed on the final map, X 2. Adequate provisions shall`�be made for acceptance and disposal d of surface clo- Ainage entering the nVooerty from adjacent areas. X �1. The following storm drain sha I I be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer as shown on the plans subject to final a,proval by *`2 City Engineer. X 4. Prior to recsardation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage stv,ly for the projsct shall be submitted to the ;,City Engines for re " S. A drai ;.&I `- basin per City Standards shall be constructec, cased runoff _�_ Gradiing X I. Grading of the subject property shall be is accordance with the Uniform Building Cde, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved concepturl grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform suct work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shill be prepay �d by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading committee and shall be completer' prior to recordation of toe final subdivision map or issuer::e of bji " ,no permit Whichever comes first. X 5. r'inal grading plats for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit: General RequiremPnts and Approvals X 1. Peril's from other agencies will be required as follows: CaiTranz for San Berra;dino County F oo Control 6istrict "-" Cucamonga Cou—,ty Wader District for sewer and water X ` San BernaMino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance 0 a grading permit.) _ diher, t 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions ar,. - Gstrictions (C.C. &R.sl approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the wap. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telepaone prior to street constructon. X 4, Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivisi -or► shalt be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrartstSan Bernardino Cvnty Flood Control District. W X 6. Approvals Nze riot been secured from all utilities and othEe. it :j.,rested agnncies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received fror„ them. ^4° L} F �, ] X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be `at:ailable at the time building permits are requested. When build g permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writirl.. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance witi; the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control,. in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City _ Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance for X 9. Prior to recording, s deposit shall be posted with the 'City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final asp submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division,' tie_ notes and bench ;narks referenced. �. .Special . Nnditions X 1. The texturized pavement used for pedestrian walkways traversing ',the ;ite shall not by placed within the public stre,• pavement. X 2. The precise design of the south intersection of Trademark Parkway with Haven Avenue as shown on the plans is not approved and the final design shall bp., subject to the approval of the City Engineer. X _ 3. Sidewalk shall 'e provided on a:. least one side of interior streets. X_ 4. The northerly; driveway on Utica shall be centered on the proposed General Dynamics drivewav to the east. X 5. - Notict OF Intent to join the praposed median island landscape district shall be filed v,th the City Council prior, to recordation of parcel Map. X 6. -No median openings will be allowed in the Haven Avenue and 4th Street medians fronting the site except at the northerly Trademark Bl +rd. entrance and Utica Avenue. X 7. i All drive approaches to City streets shall he constructed to City Commercial Standards. X 8: Utica Avenue shall be constructed from the northerly parcel boundary to 4th Street upon development of any parcel fronting Utica Street. X 9. Street and storm drain improvements shall be provided upon development of each parcel as required byrthe City Engineer. X 10. The final design of the Trademark Blvi"i. medians, including openings shall be as approved by the City'(Engineer. A cash deposit shall be provided for oni� -half of the cost of the construction of the median island ;ncluding landscaping within . Haven Avenue fronting the Parcel Map prior to recordation of the final map. I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: -6- 2 i vet s yr nnivuRV %JU%i1UUVT4UA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 11 i 85 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, Community Development Director BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL hSSESSHENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW E5 -31 I R R NK R - The development of a master plan for a 44 acre office business park and the first phase consisting of 3 office "buildings totaling 88,900 square feet, on 6.5 acres of land ?c the industrial Park District (Subarea 6), and Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the aortheast corner of 4th Street and Haven Avenue - APN 210- 081 -1, 2, 3, and 16. RELATED FILE: PARiCEL MAP 9498 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Master Plan, phasc- I site plan, phase I elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B.. Purpose: Construction of Phase I - 3 office buildings totaling 88,900 sq. ft. C. Existing sand Use: Vacant. D. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Vacant; Industrial P District /Haven Avenue Overlay District, General Industrial District South - Vacant; City of Ontario East - General Dynamics Industrial Park District, General Industrial West — Vacant, Industrial Use; Industrial Park District /Haven Avenue Overlay District E General Plan Designations• roject its` e - Industria7_Park Nortf - Industrial Park, General. Industrial South Not Available - City of Ontario Eeit - Industrial Park, General Industrial West Industrial ITEM M _.t PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 85 -21 - ReiterlRinker September 11, 1985 Page 2 F. Site Characteristics: Site is vacant and.vegetafinn consists of 4oan:ioned vineyards and a row of mature trees opposite the centerline of Trademark. Avenue. The site slopes in a north /south direction at approximately 3% (see page 11 -2 of the Master Plan text). I1. ANALYSIS: A. General: 1. Master Plan. The intent of this Master Plan is to serve is a guideline for future phased development through established criteria and standards, both in narrative and graphic form in the areas of site planning, ar6iitectural designs landscaping, and public works improvements as required sy Haven Avenue Overlay District. Each phase of tievelbpment would require separate developmentjdesign review ;see attached Master Plan text). The developer has submitted a'parcel map with this Master Plan which is also being considered by the Planning Commission at tnis meeting. A separate staff report has been included for your review. 'Ne overall. circulat an plan includes an interior loop street designed as a public street with connections to 4th Street and Utica Avenue and to the north. The Master Plan emphasizes pedestrian amenities and consists of buildirirs clustered around plaza areas which are linked with texturized : pedestrian walkways, and arcades. The proposed G Master Plan focuses the office and business building u land uses along Haven Avenue and within the urban center at the intersection of 4th Street and Haven Avenue. The northeast quadrant of the site has been planned for light industrial, research and development use, to serve as a buffer from the more intensive industrial use to the east (General uynamics). vis!,ally, Vie urban center is ;he focus ,k of the Master Plxs4; with mid -rise level office * buildings that .per off to low -rise industrial R & D ,4 building tc cne northeast quadrant of the site. 2. Phase 1. This phase is located at the rertheast il corn:r of Haven Avenue and proposed Trademark Street, and proposes the development of a three -story office` budding and 2 one -story office °buildings, clustered Aft around a plaza area. This portion of Trademark U-�" n . PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 85 -21 - Reiter /Rinker September 11, 1085 Page 3 Street will be fully improved along with the northern street connection. The developer is also proposing to install a symbolic entry statement at the intersection of Haven Avenue and Trademark Street as well as Haven Avenue and 4th Street with- =:,his Phase I development. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee has reviewed the project and found that the Master Plan a,d Phase I comply with the Industrial Specific Pl %m and the Haven Avenue Overlay District in regards to the buii'ding orientation, style of architecture, plaza area, and locations of parking area. The Committee has recommended approval of the Master Plan and Phase I provided that the following improvements be made: 1. Special project entrance statement sholld be provided to the corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street since this location is designated as the eitryway to the City. 2. The plaza area st.ould provide pedestrian oriented facilities such as shaded seating areas with attractive landscaping, kiosk, benches, trash receptacles, and other street furniture. 3. Public transit facilities, such as bus stops should be provided with appropriate street furniture design. (see Exhibit "H" for location of transit stops). 4. A uniform sign program should be provided for the Master Plan and Phase I. The developer has agreed to work vith Staff in preparing revised plans for those required improvements. further, the developer will be presenting conceptual plans for the project entrance statement and additional street furniture to the Plam,ing Commission at the meeting. Design Issues on Texturized Pavement Within Public Ri hg t -ot- ay. A major des.,. element of the Master lean is the strong pedestrian linkages across the site. The developer is proposing to inst„ll texturized pedestrian walkways throughout the site including across the interior loop road. The purpose is to establish an asp -scale quality business park, where the design wou14 provide attractiveness, recognition, and unity to the entire Master Plan. However, Engineering staff has expressed concern with this type of pedestrian amenity s it provides- a false stinse of security for pedestrians, a safety . -8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 85 -21 - Reiter /Rinker September 11, 1985 Page 4 hazard, and maintenance problem. Detailed reasons for opposing this pedestrian amenity theme are described in the separate staff report for Parcel Map 9498 (see Item "L" of the Plann Ug Commission agenda). C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist. The developer has expanded its Initial Study to address the concerns of the traffic /circulation, grading /drainage, wind, biology, and noise, where those mitigation measures as recommended by the consultants are incorporated into this project. Further, the developer has submitted a tree analysis report to evaluate the existing windrows and mature trees. According to the report, the windrows are in poor condition and cannot be preserved, while appriximately 30 mature trees consisting of olive trees, pepper trees, and walnut trees, could be presericA. The developer is proposing to preserve 11 of these mature trees by maintaining the trees where they are currently located. The remaining 19 mature trees will be preserved by relocating them to other suitable locations, such as at the entrance statement of Kaven Avenue and 4th Street. Attached for y.: review is letter from the developer and the tree analysis report from the consultant; also see Exhibit "R ". With regard to the environmental impact of road noise from Haven Avenue, staff recommends that a final acousticai report be required for exterior and interior noise reduction per the requirements of the City's General Plan. Based upon the expanded Initial Study and the tree analysis report, staff has determined that there will not be a significant impact in this case because the mitigation measures as desc -ibed above have been added to the project and the Conditions of Approval. If the Planning Commission concurs wi'lh theme findings, issuance of a Negative. Declaration would be a�oropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This aroject is consistent with the General Plan, the Industrial Specific Plan, and the Haven Avenue Overlay 3istrict. The project, with the added mitigation, measures, - w'll not cause 'significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the pro;,osed use, building design, site plan for Phase I and Master Plan, together wi:;h the recommended conditions of apprnval, are in compliance with t;je Industrial Specific Plan and the Haven Avenue Overlay District and all other applicable provisions of the City staVdards. q: i 0- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 85 -21 Reiter /stinker September 11, 1985 Page 5 IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider all material and input regarding this project. If the Commission cone . <•s with the findings, issuance of a Negative DEclaration and approval of Development Review 85 -31, including the Master',Plan, through the adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval, would be in order. Respectfully su milt- - 6 , _ ac Community Development Director JL :NF:ns Attachments: Master Plan Text - The Gateway Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site sltilization Map Exhibit "C'" - Master Plan Development Table Exhibit "D" - Master Phasing Plan Exhibit "E" - Land Use Map — Master Plan Exhibit 'IF" - Landscape Master Plan Exhibit "G° - Landscape Concept Exhibit "H" - Circulation Plan - Master Plan Exhibit "I" - Master Grading and Drainage Pi&n Exhibit °J" - Grade Cross Section Exhibit "K" - Storm Drainara Phasing Plan Exhibit "L" - 'Wind Control Plan { Exhibit "M" Phase I - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "N" - Conceptual Grading Plan - Phase I Exhibit "O" - Conceptual Landscape Plan - Phase I Exhibit "P" - Conceptual Elevations - Phase I Exhibit ' "Q" - Floor Plans - Phase I Exhibit "R" - Tree Location Plan Initial Study, Part II and Addendum Letter from Applicant Regarding Tree Removal F` Summary of Tree Analysis Resolution of Approval with Conditions CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANK iNr, DIVIS ON 9 3'11� DVRTH rrEm TOLE= EXHIBIT, SCALD= U DW-Mm el FaMMIs md J I " 9trial "I lkim "sed Oft* Bu#dLV Gon.9 Dy"."m E.fsltmg Wafahou" 130ding 1� NORTH CITY Or rrb1. Alk Aex- Ari i., RANCHO CUIC"i IONGA RAINNING DIVISaN EXHIBIT, SCAL.E---- j- rl 9 ffT !n L ✓ n' { N n 4 r + G _ G < _ py G L W V7< ~G N l m e w 9 n n F 7 GO N -Ni o� E ' i C < N ge~i Rn w w _n N I w m N ne S ? O O <N M2 C.Ni 00.4 O Oi5N YY LL [� HI C W j Q< W3 CQ < � a uoz aaou aLa ti<. NaU F`7 N Gi. G t 6` r 06 OZ az 0:70 <,O = t3U0 t7TCO N< 1NJ NYG CIO_2O N .00,0 W YL < -0 O �zN OCO Y CGb 3iu CCY lCNOt cz JOQ O mmV 016E ffT !n e W V N n 4 r + G _ G < _ py G N W V7< ~G C r:2 G m e w 9 n n F 7 GO N -Ni o� Rho C < C av= « n• e W V N n 10 « U � r + G _ G _ py G W V7< ~G C r:2 G O C tS 4W F 7 GO N -Ni o� Rho oe VNY< 00 ¢� ccc nie n O W S ? O O <N M2 C.Ni 00.4 O Oi5N YY LL [� HI C W j Q< W3 CQ < � a uoz aaou aLa ti<. NaU F`7 N Gi. G t 6` r 06 OZ az W N m M1 C 3iu w OO I Y CC.CCUC �' K W p.iUOL O CT G Ii'r O . a_-:O W :: C_ G fn —< L. R u G6G lea MA av= « n• e W V N n 10 « U � av= « n• e W V n 10 « U � r + G _ G _ < G C r:2 G O C tS <C F 7 0 CVg iN -Ni o� Rho oe O �.iaC2 -r =05V mac= O acv ccc nie av= « n• e n R N w g$ m N ti<. NaU F`7 N Gi. G t 6` r 06 OZ az 3iu Cy N amI1_ OO I CC.CCUC �' G CY«YC< W p.iUOL O CT G Ii'r O Y a_-:O W :: C_ G fn —< L. cG4 G6G l� f� I .t �Y.t't��� � #�= '�i�+rL7 :•� t'�-�r;�"lti � n. rr� ?•,set r�r�' : � .;J' {�,�t �Y:�: � = �tl�i•ii�;?�'( � ��'� �� .a t"i ..tai t�,�lr��'�' • � �I t -tk s Itohe Jl' ; �, �lj tease Twc Cst ltttrerfiiili.. I ;a * j' � r .., 1 1. r• t (. ( 1( J t 4�*7 i " tI ° �tle�iri•w0 /k r vi, t3 r t. r M1/ It t 'Fshtis� I hroe l r Fni f ^'; il- lfz `4+'!IW �•'0 t' ,i ' '''"l?� •t;' f tL _.1^A�,� AQif'�ttl {3 ':f1,,� Glfl ^i1S� �.��'Q i • . l : "I , -xwn, sat, CITY OF YL, EM: PLAN ,\r, DIVIR cx\q E1'HiBrr•_ X ScALE �l c NORTH Vic t Mt "Phhe t t "A }J �ve o- � ''s► ti ?hase Fodr: , -xwn, sat, CITY OF YL, EM: PLAN ,\r, DIVIR cx\q E1'HiBrr•_ X ScALE �l c NORTH Vic t � ''s► ti ?hase Fodr: , -xwn, sat, CITY OF YL, EM: PLAN ,\r, DIVIR cx\q E1'HiBrr•_ X ScALE �l c NORTH / 0701 -02 o 9-1.1-85 P.C. Agenda Packet o Page-5 of 6 CITY t)i-(' RANChD CUUMM NGA PLANNING DIVISIOiN \' t`k - t CANDOSE$UMMNRY f Grfnt4nmata -- ' PgOJECfRAE�CSULlpkgt^'" -- LAWN UO2 PL AH THE GATEWAY RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA • NTiitlttYT Tx. TNt tlnitt•ttlTtt OtltLtlkinT C0. YLt�IT C flit Tin �np iitOClATti ILI' Ylxi tt01TWTYi� YtlxtiLtYa 7- i e4 V NORTH f %Erin- TITL.CE= EXHIBIT-- $ ; I'M m �mrnxlia $ifc {�ax. �d rwFW r +� ►l,r r4.k(d. f4L.r rccaeu. '�i" _ � Ywt�.� a.r :.,... r'i"f..«�.C',.A�;,. }�l ttne�ry�pm�({ba d cd+4 w.ls d h �.1 fa 4d • r<fr�Q�n p«w Hl�rx.de qdt fir dkd J p,� �«y wi+..Qa. l.iw ®?r�garf i/., wNu iiwr rjf4h a Ini�P .v.4 iM o*' br d fk (a'Yf'.wd.P� • O uu d H.Ad pud wlyd�+. :.. udr i dL fi w t iLd:i k. 44 ale. 4 WA' rL.w'fi rud of ly'd p a4 nr r o aF F 1.f pr4 eSk rafio� wr.,, rris t. o..{ pd.� r3�91�m it wpm.n tsiF' a rbuen ..F n.ri.. � rsl6:,. s.Afeiaru.Mrr m.0 s�ndr an k k p�.fd a �d.•rPgnre rja.4. :tea wra: flw t«6 a+ aai(x ik enndmd do Spn;n re ne;+. iwypf a! •'+,�,� . f. fi lwwF {&Iwa iI G. �5ad;l Fr wp:•iu (y IW, e, ad a;4 .�i' � p'r,:c Wd�ti:er`"tirr p!i�' bt N�a r6nb�LGn. a.?. isae..hmba Indea. 71a �r w.. R I -AIN lIS PCIIAI G. iC 01 (IN� 12pif I°IC�RTH CITY OF R-)% TCHC CL CAMONGA TITLE PLANKING DIVISICXN EXHIBIT= S �A` t Z P a_� r z K r A r f�� o= psi v � �. w`,� ►Z d ate° a .r Am bo,. €3 JF�fa li-z At ® —3 •J a_� r z K r A rF-r' ter, o= psi v � �. w`,� ►Z d ate° a .r go FM rw ci a ynT bo,. €3 JF�fa li-z At ® —3 r A rF-r' ter, i • f �I Ll �� 11111111111111111 9 NORTH CITY OF T r U&M. 9 RAl\Ct-IO CLCAMOINGA TM E: �i�' A PLANNING DI`JISIOiN EXHIBIT- _ _ALE: --- 00'--_._ C a Q o F o !1 Li 1. 2ri `i y • �' t if r F n � rr wry rift B ti of eg' arc I y!� M1AYN�•• ...•— .,:a.. P i :o g • a o �.; a �'� r ,� °� r_rt iZ •° , , �`�: L-C�r I{ rr ' W� � „j�ti ;,� ,-,,, :o .. �� .,cn_?,�,�ty�� {� ' a; PtldSE� %, Ij •�t� M � � �Fi �a. � � 1{'9 j j"rj � � n�a � �- rrzq_°T} t�i„f•,ja; {” '^ - ,'*�', „b I � "•p��^ [ �- - -- k, 1.3 to lym.ew•.. Brun /.�. v ;� i" •i �` � t1, Y r i �' r1 ass I i. �, ts•- � � it t . IOU�TM 6TRELt�— - -•��_ -- II II i IIIIIIIII I l I II 1111 NORTH CITY OF ITEM: �® RAItiTCHO CL - ANIONGA ZIrI.E: � f eu PLAM ` I\TG 1?iIVISIOi`.i EXHIBIT- SCALE- k k 4 t Ile e, ilgllllll ,i E -.1111.,11 491.1 � 11191,1111 *r or t —E —a 1 t r r in lilts ea ■ I INN in lilts ea M • .iii .. • • • � .. • a.,r a l I l `�h % C 1 [ i r•/ / l Jlaa ilb- •' • '�` , . \( , �... • ,• � • l � • art y rte// } E--- az a 10 m�.tt(a 4r �• q .yl 4 i ! s'! � f r�+jJ / ,•�,t i —•/� �, /�r � � � ``\ \fix U s BMI,\V N3014 H, !13 O w J c"3 F H d 7 U O � ®� L U a'�. � h _ 4 w{� �i�r of s 'i if Hae spats !F V m �4 so A ,r s,l ,Zv NOR IW i +* mRaxe k' l k -H �w2«y { \ \� We � / \� - � y\\� � %dam puk- ,. � y : «» �\ � \? .� � } LEVEL 3 I_ 1` LEVEL t ,a .r NORTH CITY OF EV T IT: -- B a� LANTCHO PL.ANNING IVLSI(?N EXHIBM k SCALE: E D y fN' e/C 4. A.H. REITER DEVELOPMENT o .p August 22, 1985 On TO: Nancy Fong 2�6 0 s'oy'oy� Assistant Planner ✓d CITY OF RANCHO C- ,1*10NGA �C FROM: Tim J. BeedAem, RE: The following su mmarizes the existing tree study regarding the Gateway Plan background. Accompanying the Envirormtental Initial Study is an analysis of the grove of trees located approximately in the northwest quadrant of the Gateway Project site. Because the major circulation access required to come through portio r of the grove, this analysis was prepared to show available methods for selected preservation of significant trees. The report from the consulting arborist, Ms. Cy Carlherg, analyzes the quality and characteristics of all trees within the project boundary. Early in t'�, alysis it was discovered that the Eucalyptus windrow loc long the iorthern portion of the project was in very poor -.y state. Those trees,• it determined, would be infeaarle for preservation. The reports main focus of the study was located on the grove of olive, pepper and palm trees. The s »manary of this report determines that I approximately 30 trees located in that portion of the grove are either in excellent or good condition worth preservation. Her recommandation are two -fold; either maintain the trees where they currently are located or remove and re- locate in other suitable locations. Based ) upon the plan, approximately eleven trees can be maintainer% in eir existing locations, while nineteen trees can be re- located to other suitable locations. The applicant is cu- tently discussing with tree removaL companies, the possibility of r%---location methods for trees or saving as determined from the; analysis evaluation report. The accompanying map spots the location •f 'those trees that are worthy of preservation based upon their survey number. Mai;inB Address: P.O. Box 7250 • Newport Beach, California 92..658 -725(1 - (714) 751 -4594 Pullman at.Redhill Paa=.? - Memo to Ms. Nancy Fong CONCLUSIONS; Recommendations of this report will be forwarded to r the r* '' ?ct architect /landscaper wino can identify appro pra4 +citable locations for re- locating trees within the des.Lgn 3uidelands of the Gateway Master Plan. CC: Cy Cariberg A.H. Reiter encl. Report Tree map J, N o E.� SUMMARY OF EVALtPATED TRELS ti 1 'EXCELLENT SPECIMENS Olives Calif. Peppers Palms No. 30 No. 80 if 7 11 32 " 83 12 1 16 it 19 If 20 it 23 if 24 if 40 I GOOD SPECIMENS Olives Walnuts Locusts TO -.8 No. 4242 No. 43 it 11 r, 44 it 13 it 14 „ 2 t� 'It 20 „ 27 „ 34 36 it j8 it 41 if 45 REMOVALS Olives Calif., Penners 'Locusts No. 1 No. 37- To. 82 n 2 5 9 10 17 18 IF 21 it 22 If 28 ,F 31 " 33 n 81 StuADS No. 3 n 4 .F 29 n 39 7 �' "� A rr 0 7W5 7-0 SE aMot)6�D to Pr-- swab * NORTH CITY OF ITOW. - C ANIL RANIFIO CU2tkVjJ'L\GA PLANNING DIVISON EXH'IBFr-- c) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA PART II - 2.NITIAL STUDY '::° BNV. RONM A CHECKLIST DATE: Avatst 511y85 APPLICAN -r:_ r-pi+e!'/ P-fn. J' C8Ve40(Jly1m.1 FILING DATE: 7 2.3~ SS LOG NUMBER: dVj -3 4 PROJECT: 4ncitlstari4 F30.sF3Clsf2r (�(�f. L 4frt5 QXt[l ALlSP.1• deY i-- (aCyQCPCS PROJECT LOCATION: 1d f *leg corner of }{avert Avenue oM 44h Sf ree4- I. ENVIROS:ENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO ! ' I. Soils and Gealoa. Will the proposal have significant results in; a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? V b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c. ,Change in topography or grounn surface contour intervals? - — d. The aestruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? �! e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or'o- site conditons? �! f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud - slides, ground failure, or'similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? ✓ 2. IiydroloQV. Will the propooal have significant results in: a- Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? - e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water qualii a? f. Alte7ation of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of groundwater,, eith.r, through direct additions or with - drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interferance with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? a. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temp <rature? ` 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results Tn. a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants ?' o. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? a; M_3a Page Z YES MAYBE NO J V' I J V J __ J Page 3 YES MAYBE No . c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agr$,altu aj production? Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers ! of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? v c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a bLrrier to the migration or movement of animc-ys? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Population. Will the proposal ha)re significant results in: 1 a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b, Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results'in: a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and properey values? b. Will project casts be equitably distributed among project'jeneficiarias, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users: 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal_ have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non- consumptive recreational opportunities? _ `i — Page 4 YES PIAY9E No S. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant results in: l a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street oonst:uction? -- V c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? J d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tian systems? v e. Alterak {nn$ to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? _ ✓ f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water - borne, -rail, sass transit or .air traffic? - g• Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? ._ d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? .! e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? J r� g• The creation of objectionable odors? '�+ An increase in light cr glare? Page 5 YES :LAYBE NO AMJC 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant in: results .. a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view ? V b. The creation.of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or po autial scenic corridors? 1/ 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant :.eed f2r new systems, or alterations to Zhe following: a. Electric /over? V b. Natural or pacikaged gas? ate. .j �• ,.. Communicat�tms systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? V' V g. Solid Waste facilities? Or h. Fire pryZtEtion? i. Police protection? J. Schools? r V k. Parks or other recreational facilities? V Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? V iL �kr governmental services? V 13. Enerey and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? V b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible . renewable sources of energy are available? o Page 6 YES *AYBE No e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or AML scarce natural-resource? 14. Mandatory FindinRS of Sirnificance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality cf the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or resttict the range of a rare or endangered plant nr'animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or. prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental''goals? to short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- . term impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the proa,lct have impacts which are individually IYmitee, btict cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects).(NO15e) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? CIVOLSBj IL' DISC44SION OF %*Ky __., EVALUATION (x.c., of affirmative answers to the ZN;Ve. questions plus a $is_,�ssion of propo;;ed mitigation measures) . tea +D�:1� Pars` 7 III. DETERMINATIO$ On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant a -zect on the environment, and a NEGATI'TE DECLARATION Will be p,-,pared. I find that although the proposed project could have a ; ignificant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures descr#ed on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DEC'LA.'RATION WILL BE PREPARED. ElI find the proposed project tky ve a i&n i a ffect on the envirnment, and an ENVIR0" SEAT L' ACT PO a ed. Data Signature VBQ R'�i?1�1� Title t--1- 3 ADDENDUM TO INITIAL STUDY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-31 - REITERIRINKER Discussions of Environmental Evaluation: The developer has expanded its Initial Study to address the concerns of the traffic/circulation, grading/drainage, wind, biology, and noise, where those mitigation measures, as recommended by the consultants, are incorporated into this project. Further, the developer has submitted • tree analysis report to evaluate the existing windrows and mature trees. According to the report, the windrows are in poor condition and cannot be preserved, while approximately mature trees consist)ng of olive trees, pepper trees, and walnut trees, could be preserved. The developer is proposing to preserve 11 of thesz mature trees by maintaining the trees where they are currently located. The remaining 19 mature trees will be preserved by relocating them to other suitable locations, such as at the entrance statement of Haven 4venue and 4th Street. Attached for your review is letter from the d,14aloper and the tree analysis report from the corisultant; also Op Exhibit 11R". With regard to the environmental impact of road from Haven Avenue, staff recommends that a final acoustical report be required for exterior and interior noise reduction per the requirements of the City's General Plan. RESOLUTION NO. w` A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION ' APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 85 -31 FOR A MASTEF. PLAN AND PHASE I DEVELOPMENT FOR AN OFFICE AND BUS " "'' "ARK LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF HAVEN AVENut mNO 4TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT AND HAVEN AVENUE DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 5th day of August,- 1985, a complete application was filed by Reiter /Rinker Development Company for review of the above - ,.described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of September, 1995, the R €ncha Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consi -ier t o above described if °Jject. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: k SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is 6 located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and Haven Avenue Overlay District ;.and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to. properties or improvenents in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the env~ronment and that a 'legative,Declaration is issued on September 11, 1985. SECTION 3: That Devalopment Review No. 85 -31 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: Resolution No. DR 85 -31 - Reiter /Rinker September 11, 1985 Page 2 PL.AIINING DIVISION A. Mas'cer Plan. 1. Tt;e Master Plan is approved in concept only and future development of subsequent phases shall ba subject to Development /Design Review process for Planning Commission approval. Modifications to the Maier Plan shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. 2. A variety cr gradation of color tones for the buildings of each phased development shall be provided. 3. Symbolic entry statement throughout the Master Plan project entrance, that is, at Haven Avenue and 4th Street, Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway, oar -n Avenue and Trademark Street, 4th Street and Utica, and Eastway and Utica Avenue shall be p'r'ovided. 4. Public transit facilites, such as bus stop, for the project shall be provided. 5. Full material samples and colors shall be provided for the developmenv. each phase of B. Phase I• 1. A Uniform Sign Program for the Master Plan shall be providers and submitted for review and appro,­1 prior to issuance of building permits. `L. Detailed plans for the symbolic /entry statement shall be saNiaitted for Design Review Committee for review and approval, prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Detailed lans for p public transit facilities such as bus stop, shall be submitted for Design Review Committee review and approval prior to bsuance of building permits. 4. A final acoustical report to reduce the exterior and . interior noise per the City requirement.. for 01 the buildings that front on Haven Avenue, shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building per -its for Phase I. 5. Those mature trees, approximately 30 as identified in the Tree Analysis Report shall be preserved, either uy maintaining them at the present location or relocatin7 them to a more suitable Tkation. A tree removal permit is required for that (jurpose. . eklution No. OR 85 -31 - Reiter/Rinker September 11, 1985 Page 3 Alk 6. A tree preservation plan as well as detailed analysis ii of the proposed relocation method shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of any. grading permits for Phase I. Further, all trees to be saved shall be enclosed by a chain link fence prior to the issuanca of any grading or building permit and prior to commencement of work. Fences are to remain in place during all phases of construction and cannot be removed without thewritten consent of the City Planner until construction is complete. EN'GINEERLIG DIVISION 1. Improve the entire width of Trademark Parkway fronting the site, including full curb- returns, at Haven Avenue. 2.. Improve Haven Avenue fronting the site. Also provide pavement and striping for right turns into Trademark Parkway. 3. Improve west half of north /south street extending north from Trademark Parkway for portion fronting the site. 4. Provide protection from drainage from the north as approved by the City Engineer. i 5. Pru,,cide an on -site drainage system as approved b ,the City Engineer. 6. Provide an easement and erosion control facility for drainage directed south from Trademark Park�vay as approved by City Engineer. - 7. The texturized pavement used for pedestrian walkway traversing the site shall be eliminated within the public street right -of -way. i, 8. The parcel map relating to the project Master Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 9. The project Master Plan shall be subject to the conditions of Parcel Map 9498. i Resolution No. DR 85 -31 Reiter /Rinker September 11, 1985 Page ,4 i i APPROVED AND ADOPTFO THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY< Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Jack Lam, Secretary I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Cc;nmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comraission held on the 11th day of September, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: ZOMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: H 41 u CL U R. lkz F� i v t z J, 73 1-: 4 .7a rc tz J, a 4 -.:,g Z. -R. ip, HE E mall M i z.- at -H '--:5 Z-SB". .1 o S4 RL 4-1 SEE a; 19 Z. E g- Z.. We s A IS HN I A IE Lv �.°.UC GC Na �UTO��OU C. � "O.a dur a oEUQ OG EU... plUO ' 2 q 0 C� A L Y C O.w CNuL dp Lyp . u NC C u E An A -s mg u nY O dq doAYD dO ULC VNG u • Y •Y• ^VN v0 < E d E d t A O Cf 4 v 0 � a E 2 CG C¢q 0q O Dt E. .r+ LO a aY C < w alT a LdGY O i V'Gm L _` Ny�L Ow d uy �r Z coA fi�+yL 4v.. '] n.Fi+c n�Aw ,yv L NSFC .d,o 4 u Ao «a �N.rL s'� ^nr v J dw n aa°N }}aN'u .L.Yu ud 2 i v°fq� N � ^NCO. WEdpN N._oa 2M EOE Ltd Ag qWw a � 6U O.� xE> d�C A dOx. i4wFd�N Cua�igK p 026 E'�M yia ^ €wuw1 dC UN ZN p. NC lip- LO Vf O Ap. hM N'N «4 %Ftq'a OFD.. 0.1. YL L qt uww ¢N u A EOE L 'Ly Gb N9V up'. O "' O ^a ^dd ZE. ACC. Gm �. N U O y L a aD i'.yN c alga¢ c ¢L't a A. L EE L q q Y. u y p DON ^ i OIs u^ N _ .O ' d A Oq3 VZN�A d0 d.Ly. dO.^ y L LN A.N yp FaE etc pmw Y m o" on Np NC gFxy� O� �W ntlNduN oNLC aAa � uj Ydy� .YYCU� 'o^d La C� » Y Yq�A ,per G26 GO 6 U Mg tiEE Q O o y T Y N ^ NL r La1 �. aLaL < V LEGLA.+wLp P EY O YL uNOQC O Trdw�L kK0 mnC .0 L I N naoc o¢ `dace.., q. n yci da, Yrq 4 p V c O V O N Z.2 .ca pu¢ A L o 0'G «. n Su E wyaL+M N Lv, y NT q x q0 OC4 LN �3V. vEx 6Y t L. EOLU0A3 LC+'�SL 4yaCG Y. CyN a >>1 oqE _YO 'O F � pNL aL LGU '.d N.. €.N a do U.e a: u d Y d Y .O x L i N 9 d O C EE V L L L C t EA:y NL 40 C aw LE 'o aLq quo �Dy qW 2 �¢D v L c�'a cpo 4 a L °' •+ °'r u Au +O.�u Or q CO. iC Cd r� >qC 1'K ��y GNP �QxC LA u wC E l vFgi C d x A —. U t u �x OTYL CdA a �T SauNL � COVH LQ OIW'." _2 [ yu O ay O' N .J' ¢U L Em Pawn dam. Qua. ¢OU War. C WI gx`^NC aE VOOaOi a2m PO G qr = O OE CC n= tb LN ^^`0 >O a4 CL. CY CvO po LY O,c 6AL� T O O x w u w d d a C L L � 6 'q CN La qa�a C HE ZN Yn QO uTf ya O�Nn d E L %duA .� La9 F6 qw U �M. I. O d Yy. «GL �ieYL� unLa O V`a^ Yo-dn tj -u N.p tU V -O LqO. Oy �pU �QNE Lwm �* E 0a SY 0�0 AFC .+L40in u OC LL a v . a�a�iC C~6y. y .^..y a L IN p a G C 6 AAM L y E d0� A A O1.y. LA�q. OI A O d0Y d Ow¢¢Pd C^ t o'qG O L 'L N.o C LO L6� d LO Ya O AOU a�Gd9UL 6 y0 O'v i0 4 °n.e a. uLin � Nom c°.Yna .YO acf F.d N.c .Na r.B .nocwn 'I .dd C'O atT VC L Y ^c'Of Ofa G1 VLac+ga `SA^•N aom �o a �d cu ocoo0c�uTgy 'rta e_ u +M -iV ELd` ti ct ^ q NU Tj V 00 i pdyy0 ~O ^^ day OU ^O 9�a N6 U Oa M o q' q q^C ty Z-. L C E C9 i 6B L' = ArN•f VliT a`o t`O� is E L C ^ G f MV CyYa yY d J�OA q.6 G 6y6N ° N�6 T �a y� y L Yi ^ C qN� 5--i r- u q o L c NUS 1 C aE qN.°.o< LACY _ S EII SG Ad�q G N c °Ui•.L C; d X E° y q` . EXL LR ^a0 NT ND N y Z L% NC po YN �d V jf XL -ttc V dL CMC a� m NCB MdnN V�d NN VLa .� 9 CNnM ej n p ^ tJ^ O1 w,°cu AUK ^ G 4 Gi N o.0 oa I y �9 U �L+`- Y^ a y q G..OiL 0N� C 0900 ° Nd 4X Cb aV N ddd O^ EG a �ayL ° AQ L ^ E'v �� u =pp .E °`q<fq V6C� VOb pC L V9 n c y 4°.tad • ij Y ! -`r G. q:.f.NO G tr0? Eyyo def k T oV a L �d.60 U. W lD L Y N Of o ` - O N K C oT G I ON �Y dd9dU A d.L- C u o OY.� GNU 2.2 O Y C ^E d T Cf p:0 Y A U C C^ ° N U 6 N N 4 N N O !L• 4 M u ^.- tT> Of n 0 M-2 0 6 4 IS th O A, n 'I .dd C'O atT VC L Y ^c'Of Ofa G1 VLac+ga `SA^•N Op w= i. o,- m ant' -.i ti ct ^ q NU Tj E q A N vo �a> U' Oy LTy v p' ate. L f"M6 °nefN N O. L. ^O 9�a �LE Y y� X 6B L' = ArN•f VliT ° Sy g..�.. i.Y. ^yd ^ G f MV CyYa yY d J�OA q.6 G 6y6N dQyQ 6X N�6 T �a y� y L Yi ^ C qN� 5--i r- u q o L c NUS 1 C aE N LACY _ S EII SG Ad�q G N c °Ui•.L T^ ` .p L 4 F p U 6Ty Y b Oui q CLi mLL cYt N� °� aC°�- Zwz ° AQ L ^ Y` ' °`q<fq V6C� VOb pC L V9 6 o tR y 4°.tad • ij Y ! -`r G. q:.f.NO G tr0? 6TiN Up4.if60 HON ^A 60V QtiA Wd 4�V1�\. o - _ Y • M j N aro N Y ro L� L U b • � °q V_ •-u c� 6 U L> U H q° a• V c ` d E n V cn .�-EU E L •a2 �•po .xY =9 M> u a+ ov E3 a A ° 0 N E T O N L. Oc O E V O S Y q W to M atY O C� LL•Nn 1- Yt°i Up bN Y }% E u U� ut.Y CE .Lys > c N TL O QJ OECEO aZ E. V 3 N• O EOqutr. w. •O N ^L CNq '9y��n cL0 V O.a 6"' uENN u u dT mro E•:d.. • ..._ nQaYiu+ a Eq y0� YOq .D.q E4.c rood S u9 v}E Y my C++u.�d G N y L V SJOy YO royEa C �A 4 C FO C A }• ._ ro U O Y q O. v t°L d •y •� •+ C a O CY U 6 .L.• Y T ron Na 6y '40 N ro E T •^iq.�L y � >S H LE d1O you! Yn E`` Y'. •' u C O y �L� C �v� N q c^ O^ Y o C u2T N��9� d�T m V't°ic EEaE roN�d d pu. Ed °v .c •co�NL °r•- {�U.� O N Oq 1L E 6 L. pnU� A v 6 �. N >OtA^ La Ey. or. L v OY gLaOY w c E M9dv L W N G F A. q •�+ 0 l� V YI L 62 o. •- �•I Z � PN La c� Y6 • Uaa NC YO Y . =y t c \4 a `q a0•roY pL° yCY Edo ; ro uC N L u O y O A •� C c Ctu N 6 ro N 4^ D,. c u t°i Nro L q.�•n m: cL� L �[ T O�Q` E« LN•'^n cT y� q ,..° 6 °u � ° N i «ate r •°rro> r. Yp- •�Ll SN.LN •�i•! C 9 dY � E u �.-. �� U > �� ro U T •� V T we q al c M 2 q W^ O L a O ENT a 6 C O C aoa d88 U2 Lac c S C y y jv Nd Eq CL �c . •°r Y.° c° E Ty L ro WYC.a.• io .°�. roC O' d 4 N N Ly E�69 a 3 ^ u�t7 9T a.> ...V) TT d d•°,•� y o 4 NE u '• N N t � L d a N W O1 � O N N p� L W 6 _ y1 L. N O c• q ro u e.. ar qn _ •r _ 'C�T �nLO� Y u g C N N a a i L .. T E N= q o. m E^ •r O q i C d9 E N. o t M ` L ° c 6 ro N G` yn Yc tT ii N u T C O cc CC L SO O yy mup�J� L Y' O V ° _. ° Y ° Y Y fY. y2 YY O. �C 4C C O 06 roNu c TQG E na N Y CEO L Y• NO u O EOIT O TW QOM �O ` C U Y C Y u L.•.. •P A q u y •- O 6 tOL C L d '� N� U N L .- Of ro ' c N O °A ? 9 U o c t L^ L u 0 •- .N NO U•+ vni`' .r LEA 4 F- q.• -qc• 6'nm G. unN u WI8 i WE= CWNu e D Aim �i 2 U Gl •n Q ZGOL pCGgMN Mme' py p0 HL' LL do Nye a^iE °ai mnE t V q x q o �o LL R WN�g Ot OYL� d d r.G yQ ERC. N>•q ON R 0 dln y N C�a Ll N,r Ol C d ° R � A OG S q M ECE Pc aY a Lo O G �O '.ti EOyW it p d C Ndd d y �'E E a •� Nbp O d � L n p O ne � 2 N C � "• y 1 sir o nA_ 4y jN n o-. L C� _ W W y s ad L V d T e ro n o y R> E» E 4u E p 6 d dy N d E G q qqR Oq LO 1. h 51 J C O�W OW Qm O U' N 1•f W q 9 -52 ^ T - •c O � G p R N L N O N m ^ C E ^ L a,aQ a u Lo m a t d E m r y CC 6uT ��O E�d N dp�y 6 �o d O T R n R d u b L^ ° yy C� 6y ld 6. 4 VN bl q ICd GO LCR gLp4 p a LO�u . q^ L6 V • �YO. and N� . L LyEE ^ Sp fan R Re C R 9c.0 yaLd6 day Yq OIUm6 Oa 6 ydGNq MjZ. i x p .. yp d O. it p G na .2 . 01uG °RCaC - �R C N d y p (yyO �Z ap qi aq�d E 4p »L� yam= E udi �^ ^..4 - 4= • Z � q bd yLLj ddpp � wd 6 NgNd Y yO. My C apNp' �� yC � qR p• d Rq dy q2 dN ■! d O ' > M O t T^ d C'O° �:�. Y. qY.p 'G .•. n� .�Oy^q ddpO Ri'.j3. OE Oy OI-. ° yV w. G N O ...0 RG pgON O nC O V,L^ uCC15w. tn. _R JO=O O C iE2Y. -N 6dpY w OOit NYp VI'r C. » dU Ktu »qpp dR �' u Od 6p Oayi L e 4 RO Op+•E.�L.. WNp W4U �6 �'pi 4r 40 4 ISO Q q �j IX N M O N� (' ' M A,; q O S All M p6py N! O py L J di u� N N• Yu.Y.n Y L 1uUq A O�Ey �� W Ny a NV 7 - n�ac^ n cc cow nL Cu Eu E.pn¢ CW nnA �Olq sd.Q^:C Ny °V.^ ndqu i CN U > C.yn CNp CV L V i CT ac �' O Dd.OY ` Cf.1�IL.+ _9'j[ qdN LL N." G t a Gyp. YY C � 1 Cdi Cf ° ^N6 9 °d.0 �I.NO =TYa > L q q C d q L —EN ^�^ yLn� 6� �qC dL Eu vTLU` O. dq L 2 n�N" N O 01u d L N c V Y' t > t . D L O I y a �f- qnc 10. CZ 665 _ RE W M O^ C O q Y L L i u q '� y Y W t N .- 0• E N O � d N d S y Y L 4 A W U p C= L O p, E A. d. c d y.00.� iaa � �d� 4 M N wW EcE^ 1l •� NJu d u d dY i.�.. O W d ^u dN �W W Hz YI nW <6N �. h -- N9. dVd-w Gil p. +c- W•L+Nd LU 3�i U� < W °c c d c y A.�� ° a' A w ° M d.if a� N uGUC ° U N OL V ^N 'yC _L L 9 M � C C Y a.�6 N � O i LY wN 6 N6 Yt�� ECE.~ q `— iu r C9 mow. iu n 4 a E L � N — N b y N Y i E S i V C O A p rno p a my y L E NV qam NZ D• c T E o V wD ¢ ¢'017 O 69 KQd W2 U' NaC 4L li �' O .� < V L N a � t NL 0.d � w C i Y r $ u L L U « o c n G a ^ O.„ u L _ O T CEN O'Y ° E �d� d i�Or q �c N «a m 0 n^ 6 pi. w Lr �I O t NL 0.d � w C i Y r $ u L L U « o c n G a ^ O.„ u L _ O T CEN O'Y ° E �d� d i�Or q �c N «a m 0 n^ 6 pi. w Lr �I O I� O 4 0 0 0 O � L S N D1 v °u y. W L T U VYy aw L � T � o° � d d yY a L = O Y 9 O u a d Y U p y ♦�f a A A 1-v «M «A O M O yd L Qy V a � qE2 = LL C Y4� OU d E -o coc �a y 2Z Y Y yv O Y N O.r 03N Yom'^' 0.4 Apo• � O'o6 YH .v1r Y f. ^. C YoY �ooL �i c� O i y Y Y r s noe £t ^ Y C 4 O O v 1-H ot a ^. a ^odz v A p h m L 4 m V E qOC «i c d^ Y O. N} A O C p CYQ = W N r Y Y ti m' ICI c�- �=tv r _y p a O ^ N � O oN YY ^, �O Y 4o�Gt 9J C° v N Y L F f� o Y O U JtJ� 41 « -Y °s g L M ` a � MA Y V Y L O N � O t Y L oY �+ v T C 1 C O �- a L Yg C _Y O1 iL 01W � G C r o.� tM 42 \A _: HI. - � YL u � a q u my Lau C « a A 31 o ^ « Q: y> N4 WO L d � a,... T u �' a d r> ao >cY 01 Yc N-45 v a4ld N Lo e N d y N M O L L 4 0 6 .t pY cc Y nT Lu« O ' 42N yu LN Liu EF o^ Y «Q C O dV ;9b » O� ocVl p 6 I� O 4 0 0 0 O � L S N D1 v °u y. W L T U VYy aw L � T � o° � d d yY a L = O Y 9 O u a d Y U p y ♦�f a A A 1-v «M «A O M O yd L Qy V a � qE2 = LL C Y4� OU d E -o coc �a y 2Z Y Y yv O Y N O.r 03N Yom'^' 0.4 Apo• � O'o6 YH .v1r Y f. ^. C YoY �ooL �i c� O i y Y Y r s noe £t ^ Y C 4 O O v 1-H ot a ^. a ^odz v A p h m L 4 m V E qOC «i c d^ Y O. N} A O C p CYQ = W N r Y Y ti m' ICI c�- �=tv r _y p a O ^ N � O oN YY ^, �O Y 4o�Gt 9J C° v N Y L F f� o Y O U JtJ� 41 « -Y °s g L M ` a � MA Y V Y L O N � O t Y L oY �+ v T C 1 C O �- a L Yg C _Y O1 iL 01W � G C r o.� tM 42 \A _: HI. li I P APARTIlWr mz-rlN& /I C", 'LEI. gesIPSWR j& V-v 1 err! M� . F F-E; MENCE El 0. Nf VACAN r Lor PAVING DPAN BLOCK 1111.41 s - OM WALL HRe5TAURWr E MALIAN ini REzr.,\uRmr TIFLr-PHONr- POL tF CITY OF It Nil -MDE, 05 ITEM: 17 RANCHO TGA TITLE; -PLAIJ - PLANNING DIVISICkN -1 EXHIBIT-.— Lam" _SCALE: 915 Y' CI F ATY O T A RANCHO C V Vq{�/�L }{� MO,i. G a PLANNING DIVISION CCNKm- - "Et.0c . f F -1 { CI F ATY O T A RANCHO C V Vq{�/�L }{� MO,i. G a PLANNING DIVISION CCNKm- - "Et.0c o; - �G' L Ll urRra NIORTN! ' rt r a{ ITEM: _N MnQ i TITLE= 'AtI E� 5%TC f LA�4Dgctx� p 'E. H[t31T-. u G n SCALE= hl' N -b . f o. o; - �G' L Ll urRra NIORTN! ' rt r a{ ITEM: _N MnQ i TITLE= 'AtI E� 5%TC f LA�4Dgctx� p 'E. H[t31T-. u G n SCALE= hl' N -b L lRoor -D?Alp c- AT F- Ri� PE L 1 0 rl:lT4. "/---C;Tljcco -- I CITY OF RANCHO CUICAMTONTGA PLANNING DIVISION SoU-FH rrom:—W -MDP— EE-Q TITLE: _J574-05/147726Z EXHIBIT. D-/ SCALE. mr5 N --� 071 E P ?011 GU z 1 i o I lk r:z 2:z 60 Ii r Cl �PI r- =' AL Ak r �o n Muir- 6 Qa �i Cil Oil n � 1 LO Z r L 1 M=; 4 AZ 1 U U a rr- a fi 1 (N4:: • ms's Aft V v J cn i i F E- - O W U � ' ro uU G_ U4 yZ HA Z Iy � U i i RIM- M. I!�nL I1/k!I SOUTH ELEVATION 41 i �' EAaarNG ELEVATION .s ..r SEOTIO a a r.a.wu•r M. CITE' OF rrEM: _� N'' i�1DiZ X35 -1 i. RANCHO CUCAMONG � ITS c: tee.' � �v �'�� �i r� ©,mss qp PI..ANNih'G DIVLSIOI`J F- XHI[3tT: SCALE: h�TS nt ° �1ap t er.�i T� ELE� IOH' p.D +•`.. i wry. 0 eLnnaL sOUY f- WES -qWT H s� ol Us4, T_E! ruAnnu I T oa n 40UTH ELFV1'1'�ON NORTH CITY Off' i � cat: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLe:�� -����7 PLANNNU GIVLSICXN EXHIBIT- SCALE- t11'S AST ELEVATION w vr••AREA nr r NORTH ELEVATION AREA O v.,nr rr..T ■au■ urr■ au■ uua ®- m • •.0 rnr•r — V V NORTH CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUTCAMONGA TITLG:1�i�17 -E2 �� ✓,q?7U�Ll S PLANINIINU DIVISION EXHIBIT: E-6 SCALES r lT5 E O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT G!JCAI4OA, q 2u y a .t O O F ~� Z U > DATE: September 11, 1985 1971 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, Community Development Director BY: Howard L. Fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-15 ASSURED MINI - STORAGE Construction of a mini- storage development totaling 45,000 sq. ft. on 1.17 acres of land in the Industrial Park (Subarea 5) District located on the north side of 4th Street, east of Turner Avenue - APN 210 371 -03. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Review and consideration of a precise site plan and architectural design, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Construction of a mini- storage development. C. Location: North side of 4th Street and east of Turner Avenue. D. Parcel Size 1.17 acres. E. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 6) of the Industrial Area Specific 51an. F. Existing Land Use: .Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - vacant, existing flood control channel, ISP South - Vacant, Chevron Specific Plan, City of Ontario East Existing industrial facility (Poly Plastic), ISP' West - Vacant, ISP H. General Plan Desiolations: Project Site - nCtustrial�i ark North - Industrial Park South - City of Ontario East - Industrial Park I West Industrial Park ITEM 0 (r r; PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 85 -15 - Assured Mini- Storas_e September 11, 1985 Pace 2 I. Site Characteristics: The subject site is an abandoned and unimproved flood control easement, which is fairly level with gentle drainage to .4th Street. Presently, site has 'light vegetation with no trees and has no significant cultural /historial aspects. II. BACKGROUND: During their regularly scheduled meeting on July 10, 1985, the Planning Commission directed staff to work with the applicant and resolve development issues associated with this project. The primary issue was to enhance the design elevations to appear consistent with the Industrial Park designation (Subarea 6). III. ANALVSISs A. General: The revised development pTans will consis *: of 2 two- story buildings situated lengthwise and 1 one -story building along th3 rear property line. The buildings are comprised of 11,470 sq. ft. and 1,760 sq. ft., respectively. Major changes to the site plan include the use of columnar trees, climbing vines and cascading planters (see Exhibit "E") along the west elevation and the use of a one -story building element, to be repeated twice with false windows tz appear as an Industrial Park project. The revised site plan currently meets all the development requirements of Subarea 6 (Industrial Park) designation and is in compliance with City regulations and standards. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee recommends breaking up the long arch Aecturalplanes of the west and east elevations by alternating a orie -story building element to fragment the buildings into ar�earing as three separate units (see Exhibit "C "). Additionally, false windows wc-re used to project the appearance of an Industrial Park complex. The Committee reviewed the revised elevations and recommended approval; however, the Committee was concerned about long term maintenance of the ;proposed landscaping. Staff recommends that the applicant's landscape architect provide proper access to these areas. C. Technical Review Committee: The foothill Fire District reviewed and approved the revised site plan subject to similar fire mitigation measures imposed on the original submittal (i.e., sufficient turnaround radius, placement of fire - fighting facilities, fire protection in building design, and sprinkler system for the trash enclosures). H O PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' DR 85 -15 - Assured Mini - Storage September 11, 1985 Page 3 s `t D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and determined *►--t this project_ has been mitigatd relative to concert, of creating a visual /aesthetically offensive site, and therefore will not create a significant impact upon the environment. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS To consider approval of this Development Review, the Commission must makke specific findings of consistency ~ with the General plan and Industrial Area Specific Plan. the c project has been revised con:h s`.:ent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties, or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and; site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, ale' in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and City`. Standards. , IV'. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider a input and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for Findings, the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. L Res submitted, l Jack Lan,. Community Development Director JL:HF:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan /Conceptual L 'dscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Initial Study, Part II Resolution of Approval with Conditions _. 0 O_.3 ENO I.S.P. • f, LL L LM r` I.S.P I j _ {' � 446 �•! N P,TH CITY OF ITEM: ADA S-S'- /r- r RANCHO CiJAMCJl�rGA TITLE= •CGCAT/lJ.�/ !%?. f' -: PLANNING DIVISIQN EXHIBIT: SCALE:--" �� . Ca- . a :2,94 WC..`e .. . 7 f) • ,�,y{ 4 z} i `,y �� f� x t�t.�,U,y fyti •i y r 1 ,, �m_'dFf,R"''r:i ..�� -�� . �." i .i •4tr . �„ t ' . t t h FORTH CITY OF, Irynfl: �,e s r /5- RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE, _ S CEE u.-r Lt a—,j -r-i o A) K A P - %ANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT. "B" SCALE--_ ��s � #& k � �.. �0k). k ( ` 2 ^ |kk § @! <� �4 {f 2� \ »� \ � ` all ` ®® $| _._,.___ _ NO _, . — &' spa— sue¥ voNowvon, }� | i l-'lill K� � @! <� 'lei � 2� \ »� }� | i l-'lill K� � E 'fA�aNrwaoJ NSAEaartiti �; _ - �^L•..?�u!„sw.Rj a.�." �2yrrt "g� OMB QG6M7D09 tvr'�d �nlars.J . S L, A o iJ� i1 qt 'i Y. till it ` sip ,9Y or y S �QF # i �pp 3 AO ,...� y I-0 :�'L I�G�a:'+ .aa ✓�, � :: Fjf�ura . .f ..nt*' 4,..61������j'•!- '�.' }Z%�1u,k..: ..z y "� `'�1i,,`�A��J I� jmax. ,..._ .s�.n,t�t6��i:: %4••�Ma LV• '��. �r; .tx:.:..i ' r• '% 11.. Xk.N!_.".� :`i..,'��'�` -��y V j CITY aT ITEM.- JD4 RANCHO LTCAivfoIN(, ,C TITLE.-, PLANNING DIVISION OXHIc>~ 7, -29-�"._ SICALe: - - CI^L OF RANCHO ^- UQ&M01GA-.__ _ PART II.- INITIAL STLMy ENVIRDNiIE:r :?�'CFIEC & %g$^ LING` D. E. 25 d / S � s`' LOG MM'ER_ Y l OJECT LOCATION- -440477 #s-4-a OF �'a S7,�E�s:; BAs �r3�' T.rir�E/� ��E• E- MR- 11S':iENTAL IMPACTS" bcplanatinn =of all "yer' and "Maybe" answers Aire zeouiree an attached �ets} • � . Sons :,ad Geology. C - 'Wtll the proposal t va {._ sigris'.cas results iL: a. Unstable ground conditions. orsin changes.. in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions,, displacements.,:to- WAction az burial of the soil? C- .Change in topography or 'ground- surface` contour. intervals? YES KME NO " __ Z Ilool 3. 'She destruction, covering or mcdiiicatian Of any unique geologic r *.physical featurza? e. All' potential increase in wind or water erasion of soils, affrctin_ either 'f. site site conditons ?� Changes in erosion Siltation,. a- dapositiD'%' -, g• Exposure of people or propez:;- to geologic nazaren such as earrhgt -. kesA landslides, mud- slides.,, ground failure, or*similar. hazards? h. An increase in the rates of extraction and /or use of any mineral, resource? Jf t ii drY s1c¢v GZiYl the prapasai..have signifitant results in-- 11 Page 2 . YES ?!AYBE 10 a. Changes in currents, or the course of :direction f of flowing streams., rivers, or Ephemeral stream channels: b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ox the rate and — amount of surface watez runoff? c• Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? _ d• Change in the a.*_ount of surface water in any body of water? f e. Discharge into surface waters, o. any alteration of surface 3rater quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? r / g. Change in the quantity of aroundwaters, either through direct additions or with - drawals, or through inter;°erence aquifer? with an Quality? Quantity? / Ask h. The reduction in the amount of water other - wise avri7cNle for public water supplies? J i. Expornure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding cr seiches? 3: Air Q`ality• Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or pe.,adi;. sir emissions from mobile or indirect Stationary sources? sources? b. Deteriorat.�n of ambient air quality and: /or _ Interference with the attainment of applicable ai_ quality standards? s e. Alteratica of loci regional climatic conditions, 2'fLeting alt movement, moisture or temperatrre? 4. Biota l Flo *_ a. W_.,I ia: zve significant results a• Change in the c1car3.rL_, .tics of species, incladIng diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b• Deduction of the num!,�r� of any unique, 0;;, or, endangered species rF slants? •rare ,y r 7. L>nd'Use and Planning Considerations. Will the ,. proposal have significant results in? a. A substauLial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area: b. A conflict with sny designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An 1,mpact upon. the qulaity of quantity of ' exa tines consumptive or non-consumptive .recreational opportunities? :age 3 YES �!aYB: 40 c. Introductio, of new or disruptive species if P1 ants into an area? z±. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal'have - significant results in: a. Change in f; the characte ri; tics .zf species, including diversity, distribution, or nun`>rs of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. Iittroduction of new or disruptive species of a_iimals into an a.ea, or result in a barrier ' we .a migration r g o r wement of animals?I d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? f ' k S. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in. ti a. W411 the proposal alter tl:a location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of toe human population of an area? v✓ b. Will the pra`rosol affect existing g housing, g. J X �_ create a demand ioi additional housing? $. 5ocio- Economic Factors. Will the propoa:,'.have i significaut results in: a. Change in local or regional socio- ecL,°jmic Characteristics, including economic or Commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b, Will project costs be equitably distributed among pro,%ect beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, t„ tax payers or project users? _ i 7. L>nd'Use and Planning Considerations. Will the ,. proposal have significant results in? a. A substauLial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area: b. A conflict with sny designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An 1,mpact upon. the qulaity of quantity of ' exa tines consumptive or non-consumptive .recreational opportunities? 1 Page L YES yn No 8. Transn� ortgtin, Will the proposal have significant ' lresults in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? IML / b., Psfects cn existing streets, or demand for f new street construction? e / c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? / e.• Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and Potential water - borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? g, increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _ Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have signi leant r_sults.in: �. a. A disturbance to ;:he integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? (/ 10. Health, Safety, and h'uimance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results In- a. Creatiun of any health.harard or potential health hazard? _ t� b. Exposure of people to potential, health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase In the number if individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of pecple to such organisms? —� e. `lam` increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? . 8• the creation of objectionable odors? h•' An increase in light or glare? } �, / Page 5 r YES +AY3E NO ` 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: _ h a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive " site? / c. A conf,ict with the objective of designatei or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: r, a. Electric power? " b. Natural or ;packaged gas? . C. Communications systems? / d. Water supply? / { e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? I { g. Solid wa:�te facilities? h. Fire protection? i. Police protection? J. Schools? - —� k. Parks or other recreational facilities? I. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? / 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. T4111 the proposal have significant results in: a. Use o£ substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? / c. An increase in the demand for development of _ new sources of energy? t! d. An increase or- perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? L�� 1 Page 6 YES k!AYSE No e. Suhstanzial depletion of any aonreneu.bls or scarce 'rt tural resource? _^ 14. Mandatory Findings of Sisnificance. a. }toes the - Ijeet have the potential tr, degrade the quail—. the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of f;sh or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant o; anima community, reduce the number.or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples Of the major periods of / California history or prehistory ?, / b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long - term, environmenta?'goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relarivelt brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will Endure well into the future) c. Does the project have impacts which.are ine':vidually limited, but cumulatively ASIA considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects, of an individual project are considerable when vi.owed in connection with the effects of past projects, �V snd probable future projects). d. Does the project haves environmental effects whicA will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, eithet directly or indirectly? _ XI: DI &CUSSZON Of Et3t'1 HON'ENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). ,v -�a°`f CO.rrSTErGTro.clm,.�s�.vi t .S�Gec�; A 4e .>iSR tTs G -` F.>Il�?�•t>.8l0� kf�GG e E 4�t/D 2. fF t i.2�C o� Page III. DETEP�iIi7�TI0N On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLFuRATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project coulc, have a significant e£fect'on tie environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case tecause the mitigation measures described ;'ri an attached sheet have been added to the project. -A NEGATII"E .DECLARATION STILL BE PREPAftED. FDI find than Proposed-project ' a sign i an 'ef act on the envir=ent, and an ENVIR0:2 :T D ACT REPORT s qu'red. Date 3�gar e �< Title a.. F], RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING 0MMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 85 -15 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET, EAST OF TURNER AVENUE IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, SUBAREA E DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 24th day of October, 1985 -_a complete application was filed by Don Valk for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of September, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to considir the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the 'Rancho Cucamongti Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can bo met: 1. That the proposed project is c.nsistent with the objectives of the General Plan; ani rq 2. That the proposed use is in-'accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3.. That the prop�)sed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, sarety, or welfare, or materially injurious to 'properties or improvements 14 the vicinity. SECTION 2 That this project will not create adverse impae:0.s on the environnent and that a Negative Declaration is issued on Septembert 11, 1985. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 85 -15 is approved subject to the fohwWing conditions and attached Standard Conditions: 1. Provide a shared driveway approach along the westerly pr -n -rty line. 2. Provide 5' of landscaping on both the west and east property lines to include- minimum 15- gallon size trees eery 20 feet on center, flowering shrubs, and ground cover. Also berming shall be utilized aga-inc} the walls of proposed building. Proper access for maiiteaance of these areas shall ba detailed on the landscape plans. C)- \--7 Resolutinn No. OR 85 -15 - Assured Mini- Storage September 11, 1985 Page 2 3. Final design and construction details of the raised planters within the exterior wall insets shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of buildding permit.: 4. Provide details of a solid view obstructing gate for review and approval by the City Planner, before the issuance of building permit. ` 5. Provide special landscaping treatment along 4th Street frontage (i.e., meandering sidewalk, rockscape, specimen size trees and flowering ground cover.) 6. Provide undulating landscaped berms along street frontage. The berms shall have an average height of {•'iree feet and have a maximum slope not to exceed 3 1j2 :1. 7. Architectural treatment to the west elevation shall also be applied to the east elevation. 11TH OF 1985. 4PPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY SEPTEMBER, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Jac ^T am, ecreetary 1, Jack ;:arn, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of September, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: C9MMISSIONERS: d: O i «Y °s S sill O • O. Lc�_ Y..b� -A. G p_. 6yy,wY Y wt y G pp wGiOY w gcu ` •wv O AT 0 al O (� c z za2 .a € swx O t . vry L.L+ w � C In ° w U �. TLS. E '. = a 9YU2 ba�L0 nay C6y N 7.. t • G. °� 'Ox��v� yE u��OLd'w_ c L � •�9 M � n sEA ��L Nwo E� ^ ^=Y8 y w w _ 'NU ZP�y�Nr� Yao w P.2 Go, ^L `uY nc�rG« p.... E ddo 4 O YO. •° ' G' ON.yi= Y�°�•��O cd Y vY. r. E > �... p, d�`yL �9G O��°^ naY O xEyiV xo�OY G 4 YN6D2N{.92� FOGa M. CY.M QN�YYE <ONN� rL.SL GV 14 4 AOZ `± 1�,1J U Q q y y 3 = °w n N° o a Y n'i c aknocYv V' O C S ♦ ♦♦ ss Y b 0 t q° do; O O.� °° y u U d ko V� [' /-)1 i.1 U .O S. FL F^C Yq .sa cYgp�MOY L aopia G ,rH V LaG �� a� d E 2 p 6y� O CCCCVb.4 Y ° Nr YO :.1� Y I <oy ale as Y O ^� LVn Cy P-c ¢ a yy N CdN C�. Y4O Na.1O NE �.' ••' GNY Yr V G~'^00 � apN� V y L E•�4 �w -h y •t :j _ cpN ...EaLyc b pae„N;s! �•G.T Y ^�G� a�N �vL y`SN. i.A L MN ¢. gpE1y ayC - 'SO i v NdU a • .L q 4e a^y �Ym A k�^ ��v'rW m�YbW Ny �NFSy o VcN yY FY L �f+�a �a¢.Y E •b tE�an aNa°, NyN "n .Y.IZNUa�: .�. lz l l l v^ e 4' ^ pU .99 9 9wG-b NN Y _ 4 ^qq V p�•�0�1 M:4�Y '4F6 M'p4� yM p•O. ^'Y VVL S Ly. NA y w.Y Vl pE y yb N ✓N d �-. GLT d� L <y Eg G � ado ^b ..',p'� q aY�'. • wG N.0 b ALL 6..�b GJ -• V L C�^a •� Y L Y�.^n V •O y N M ¢N O V ay b "O Nm C.....•.'AFY ..y ^ N1n ^'ww�N L� >.Cey L V.. ly�C.O.yy. ySp^Y /r VSO m► �l i 14 4 14 I I p vs^ T�^ t C:.b �uLL =q' -•.. r9 b CL r: NCyp � GJ IL °Y.C°•t C!. ~; 6a .9a0 NVQ VL C gEC`a ^`•^ M ^q�° NCVK Y P L y y E '^ ^ b m O � •• � G b L E K L s N y b � b V v N ✓^ O L 2l {,.. ¢ � Q F O � T 0' 2 p N Y y q q i V Cf � `. L Lam° O^ •+�«Y gip` >W ^ f yS� ^N� wN G� °•D.6 h P n e p 0 G r a L y S q. ¢ .'• 2 b d P} ` 2 O O a w y Q Old �. 'G`�N �.2 •o }'ir. u uy >� Y Y.r, C0.0 ^'V N .��.°p~ C .° C1.~P G.�. jbRY Gp i, n� WQ ¢b ZNT.FAnA >y Lb ¢ V E Q b ^ =NN •NCC N� u� .�V ?.� Aa. Y p,.L w9�RYbCC ^°'y£d�9 ya�'A '" aL S, �..T. 2.°.CN OtLV Y.'^E c tr°, y`, �y �b Ns, -. -�.�t ...�cYw �� c bw•.�L.. y ^N` C } Y 6o cV L. JOY n `3> OY }N ° Y r 4 C¢ G � N C•' m O L p L Y Q l a. U s Ll tz y v . b ¢¢ C a ^ q L L �. b .� y .O ° T V Lp Y •S!p Y E Lpp Y Y In u N Y u p✓ Q Y �4M I�E'dKCA rGN6M p.. 9 t N 4 0 •� �^ L..`Y Y S Y �= ONO M Y W Q' yD O Y N 0 � Y G CC .A dtO OL„•° O�Ow•.. +. ABM CYYO` wbYO UN y °� O� C\.N OI mO Y.Y ^Y T OV.0 t R'9e 1. b NA. w 1 n O D p4 cR O M. ,CC • QS�O k E� pY AVCNO A NN YO �niLO�• C CM— ^Y GyO� Y RY T�fl L Owp YY OY. AN t NYC n .Y,iau �',..°° --L. ,y �H �ia cv� °nYN� •"a vsYa wL % ^.•ia XF K4 U r y - (,i rq LOYt dP N.O °6 00- NwyT.^• ��r.°..^ YY Nb- Cl pv�.•� L"y Lam. Rf& v.. �a ooNgM y��•« wuawpp as v ~w,� '� pro v= �'•• `,o $° "'.'°.�F c- J u� iac.�`LY avi `a�N Fj M dU� Fnw C YN. � w U L •• G A O N �• R N � b Y Y Y Y L C D N= pp N G L. N Oo �•Y Y ..a V H u { {II��yFy O i = F C � L ` ° ^ K ate. C C � � � n YT PL ` a R p 5..,.. � L ,� � V° V • rY,•p�Y. a•- cN .Y ay�Y ab.�. — 6 °�.�.. V C ^fiuu _.•' �'^ � tp ny° z � na °N uca cu Ltouo.. vc w.nYM • 4.NYNY tw r « °" �`.° ^o L O`�.Ypp.. n _ O O V _^ yYy A _^ ` Y ° N^p`MgM Q N �M 3N0 1�M.r <N� ^�p�T C1 NC. LO iA�06 Gu W OTpuYi v1 Y�� ll 41 °j C L 6 Y G A c C ^ A o u ^= ^ =i'.• .N. "'J a o��� �� � �«ve•nN: t° C _ ° Ir d~ nom.• Y Ur. 70. ° � N O ^. '•.= ny t O Y� p q�.�a 1 qN °L.i.O. Y• A^ ^ O LyA� Sp L QN -1. 2 C w � ` O��p p 5�,. L�Lc Qw. s ^ � >Y 9 • r � D• q L � uYLu F QUn L >Y� a nG -. N.� L t-1 *,N, •' c c c u� A r q^ Y e N o p` N n = O A ^ a DL O N w N 4Ld wt�. .D+ L 2_ a • Z` q. �D• p ` +O Q_u a• H i Eu9 'V4 V y �`R 4 Den Ar —ipn i`O•a4 O a i nL for �. ..r 'I; •. Ra` t fir. o « Y ._+ n . ct m Ra o.° r°.v awCC D t] L. U dyT• wiO 4 Y -N G V =YD. O O i+ C '� L D C N .Sf M `° l ]'. c• ..: Y O L c y^ o N z o Y Y N w r A c M b F• ° u ° Y YA YOV S ^ ' YY CTY� O ^OL N`VC`O ?�' T »NR Gn.VC S� CVN YYO 'Sn 6V QV V �OV°•�R COL w .ANON WA R+F•N w4 h N �•p � N f; .tro r•ac F JH y�q La qU a N ^eLLC &gi� +. oP —U O> rqw uV Y^OY O.M uaw Y. ��dY rCN� O V� S�yV SNN4..rq. 4My r hJ •�: reuo = 33 . S c V r M q U w vex 8 'w^ O M G�u� No'r rW �SaA �Y y YAn gem, -Z YY I.C4Y4 O -.'ate F. gem, Y 4L •rJ Ga y.N A +AirO h L G Yd N —oa Y ^� ua7 wa YO L•.. .:o o vya eta o ubc .i W v`c ��e ° r Luc ` N ° r ° � bVi v� Y -d a•u • � v1 6 s ou �^ bu +gib >yD 0 °9 yy�IJ �rA A8� L IVE ? D 09..a.. u 7 �.W U N ° d ao° °w ° c •E y ` I. «$u � L._ w0y' w�= t.c°•S acv u. n E O C °cam q O b T y tpiM 6 �Y. 4�.WA14 w 4T r�U — OL« o. w ny q V r C L •° Y _ pE> �� i.O Y° ^ uY2>� 6 C 9L vCT 6 �r Q V� ±i�OY Y ."�9N Fi^66� 3lA.,NQ rip .tro r•ac F JH y�q La qU a N ^eLLC &gi� +. oP —U O> rqw uV Y^OY O.M uaw Y. ��dY rCN� O V� S�yV SNN4..rq. 4My r hJ •�: reuo = 33 . S c V r M q U w vex 8 'w^ O M G�u� No'r rW �SaA �Y y YAn gem, -Z YY I.C4Y4 O -.'ate F. gem, Y 4L •rJ Ga y.N A +AirO h L G Yd N —oa eo1 a Y .� q F 9 ,; F ua7 wa YO L•.. .:o o .i 6 v.� O . C q • rq ` r %�y S O ° r C1..°. r a yp y r. y G .vvM a —n +Li •- u A8� L °' '° ? D 09..a.. u 7 2- V Y C• C �� O ..0. y L E A 4 �� i.O ` 6� � L y �� T� �r Q V� La cu may° c4E c v sn — •G•ws c °dc —9 L` ua Y ' Epp wOV od � wV L. NN c. wYC T qw CSU.. r n ° ct �4L. _ NZO o c0 wC Y cb C 3, Oy JL.Q� 4 r wrNr <663 O °.6N d 4 _ r Ep Ep V � ti •* i' r D zop r V qa w.y.b+M p C Boa F Q Y .c° r c p B cR pw �• wa.°cic V ^y. C ,� uM� M �•N V �_ _� m W L�� O p V .LS O �aW CLFa ` _ u Aw xx +A t C Yp ji t• ry N.18 p O V 'may O aY. G y '+ M HR w n wrW F O Y Gp a VL >f. GQY ,n T6 q 'rp�G oD Y ° G V ... Si V V}. iii 4 . .°I wt q' 4> ✓ pY. 4 4 i CCP�w y ryV o GY'O �,ayc PNa.N N� AV N^ N u §•�W� aV4q h` oQQ .1 3 p4 cb .G. 3 wpr++a� Mirl CLLR nqD rC RLCp T C w F.� �C ��Y as � �. „u° V� 7V 'op"Gp ' °qpa �..P.GJi. pwVY O•^GO• ^•p+�gOG NVI Y Gd °qYr „Y r w� g O gywygY i Y °•�'Vy. VEN `•G'�9.0 ^O�VU~. W O 6 t YYjj Y O� OTYfY D.+ rC Y 9 {a�V 4ui LO U� L� O1 qOq l:. ° C9Y� ~l • V PYVRa PR u °•'ppY D d y q, C p0"G•tuA G1M LN UV K9 tr. �°. 4LG Zz-- o f+' �e a =`.c c•< n a ~ „�° j'QV a dpo trC .°. � X.YF Fy1 S 4q> � G V ..n•0. � 4�Q�. pRp� rV ?Ce C _ 6 G Y O G K aE� ._ y � V A^ �� y r °� G O t rF F n •� i �? p ..•C w4 in Aq�.q �O L. {•: _ N~ a� NP ,Va� v� Q p✓!Ta Yr� �. LF rVr �d T^ Y4 L �°. ^�'V V7f uZ �r y r� ^_y '' � .r..� µN ��? 4.M �« n < r G o �N r ONLw OV � L3 p•O a'C 3 G^ Cz w.p 0 a; ~ NH C� w-oe4 w�is 4F Va ^q cV^ ttV 1 O� --•ri ” is ..•�= LY ° ",YO C'�O v prr pp ?a�, �Vp LrL O ,Gb cr °�Yq iV.V CR •`q ^. t. O. �asv�e CvLM �:V •°�Vv 4Gy.`'s i.lq p. -ixL x 33 c t `•G r\ � 4 t t i 0701 -`02 o 9 -11 -55 P.C. Agenda Packet o Page ,6 of 1d a Z 0 qW � a2wV _ w _ F� V y n C o A E n -Z 46 T a H O U dp O L v� CY co 9 Y °n z9 I. Z w Y 8 Z q `OVA C ..w. Cru � ^e E E Su C 1I P c � .0- ` �v d Q Y �. 9� N.E� x- Y E= 6y QA 4v� Wf 2E w. is C E L �_ N. dCi r Qy 2 L.�n�w � EcN .q. q P'A�a." �q t °✓ ryGj w« 4..9q 0 Y ay F a p L C •� C1 0.n E.Oa 00 .aGO d i G u9 O uS s� `W n` 3° Ate. v gr� d � uyi .zdi CN V 2 i CX L -z v L S p d yEE u E. n` w C L qp Y O L C Y 6 ppge L Y S d Y L IS a G p q b- ^ L L vU .AAA AVll an E d L w f N� E. N U•°vW ql. L _. C C 1n015 Np V d. Y ZE. _ 4w N... � y 1 .1 Y Y Y Lh oz 2 N 1d a Z 0 qW � a2wV _ w _ F� V y n C YM a A E n -Z 46 T a H O U dp O L v� CY co 9 Y °n z9 I. Z w Y 8 Z q `OVA C ..w. Cru � ^e E E Su C 1I P c � .0- ` �v .4 r✓� �. 9� N.E� x- y�Se E= QA 4v� Wf U.CeANtC is C E W O a Z N �s 4 h 6 CY 9 Y rn r � P yqG •` b Y m � C O �a t p Y H F- � Yom' Z.0 C C. CM LC G C �� Gp G i� y • tpJ� G� .°- A I q O C 3L C q rY h 2.NSC !• qY V V N � l• ` V L �. as 0 a v° 42 ... M.e$ a Et �•^ y eLNid Is Y iG L dII' l5t: ~ � wY Y bG wv dxE L t. nII CN O V O L �• W 3 N C C 67 q AarVZ ~U 'rte Gf C JN N cpnp. W N. not �� °rn s tiv° �d N+^ Y V t G h.'O Ysn° x ` C h qY pt~.t O `A N•n Ste' Nu �.� C $t V ca C .rG Y . N pE M� M C � G�• G R J � q.IN p. E T� �. T • aY N N E4 N. x•+• Y L.l LN .- a•.. `.. r n::. G ua N.1 n"i.J a a, h. a.. • Y €. ° Gy Oc0 Y GJ9 ud D�.O1 U ^✓ CUO ° � nq N at 4vJ OINK ..•Lw R� »•0`5 O q+••ail C pa 40.N6v V..6 aC 4. WT o 1 Y. R a; G a^ O� o LSk 4.. v a Y,•. p�Cl � � O D N� V V• raw na.ra L � r a t V V C p Y 1 a � 2 J C N � L O C p r 4 w u 9 � rnL L �a u4 C p 9 e ` r uol �i CW wN 6J C S a �� Gp G i� y • tpJ� G� .°- A I q O C 3L C q rY h 2.NSC !• uL a cart° 2...r wd a Et �•^ y eLNid Is Y NL � RG 3Y VEb � uV� q AarVZ ~U 'rte Gf C JN � d C•C't? °rn s i6 q C� Ysn° El r?oA ca na cou. ° Gy Oc0 Y GJ9 ud D�.O1 U ^✓ ° � nq N V O U C r0 � H�� C pa 40.N6v .diZd q U'N U r S� C r .-J Y. G a^ O� o LSk 4.. v a Y,•. p�Cl � � O D N� V V• raw na.ra L � r a t V V C p Y 1 a � 2 J C N � L O C p r 4 w u 9 � rnL L �a u4 C p 9 e ` r uol �i CW wN 6J C S a