Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/01/08 - Agenda Packet ....................... r -� 07� - 02 05 P � aeda a: e t Pa� � 'Z ..4 I Z_ Z r~ Z G C3= r) 3k N CD is a mm rnm z 0 n . a . n a 1 \t r urCITY OF . ` 'RAtiCHO C[:C:1,tfO\G WEDNESDAY January 8,1986 7.00 p.m. LICTTIS PARK Ct MAITINITY CIlMR. 91%BASS YANE N.=-CHO CUCAP4ONGA,CALIFORNIA,. ACTION - 1L, Pledge,of Allegiance IL, Ron Cw7_'t Commissioner Barker X Commissioner Rempel X_ Commissioner Chitlea X Commissioner Stoat X Commissioner McNiei-XX EL Annonhcesnents Stout,Rempel (McNiel-Alt) ;Seleo'don of Civic Center Subcommittee Commercial/Industrial: Design,Review Committee Rotation McNiel/Barker Res idential/Insti't. IV. Appraraalof Minutes Chitiea/Rempel (Stout-Alt) November 27,1985 - APPROVED AS AMENDED 5-0 Feb. 3 - ISP workshop December 11,1985 - APPROVED 5-.0 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items ore expected to be routine and non-controversial- They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for disc tse^n. A. REMOVED FOR A. DESIGN_ REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10076 - DISCUSSION LIGHTNER DEVELOPMENT - Design Review comprising 19 CONTINUE© T07-22-66 single family homes on 6.9 acres(approved 19 lot subdivision to address concern regarding - TT f0076)in the Low Residential(2-4 dulac)District located continuation of Sanyan Street. at the northeast corner of London and Liberty -APN 201- 4-1 (Rempei no) 251-050. B. APPROVED 5-0 B. TIME EXTENSI011 FOR TENTATIVE TRUNCT 12577 PILGRIMS-A custom 10t residential,subdivision of 16 lots on I 4.24 acres of land,in the Low District(2-4 du/ac)located on t the south side of 19th Street, west,of Hellman Avenue-APN ti 202-041-03 and,52. a h' VL Public Hearings The fol!nwing items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each,project. C. A PR04ED 5-0 C. ENVIRONMENTAL_ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE Circulation and design PERMIT 85-26 - TIfE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY The elements to go Hack to DRC. development of a commercial RV storage lot with mini- warehouse on Ct acres of land within the Victoria Fanned Community(Medium High Residential, 14-24 du/ac), located on the north side of Base .Line Road, east of the Southern California Edison Corridor-APN 227-091-42. D. APPROVED 5-0 D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND_VICT_ORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 85-OX THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A request to amend 'he Planned Community test for7 the Victoria Planned :ommunity to allow ` commercial RV storage And mini-warehouse in the Medium High(MH)Residential.District. E,, APPROVED 5-0 E. . ENVIRO.NMENTAL_ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-41 - WEDBLAD A request to operate a travel agency in a tenant space within an industrial office park in the, Industrial Park District and Haven Avenue Overlay District,located at 9140 Haven Avenue,south of:rth Street- APN 209-262-17; F. CONTINUED TO 1-22-86 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE at request of applicant FERMIT 115-38 VICTORY CHAPEL Non-construction Conditionid Use Permit to establish a church in an existing building in a multi-tenant industrial park within Subarea 4 (General Industrial)of the Industrial Specific Plan,located on the northwest corner of Archibald and 7th(9618 7th Street) APN 209-171-47. G. CONTINUED TO 1-22-86 G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9530- at request of applicant WALKER A division of 7.7 acres into 2 parcels in,the General Industrial District (Subarea 13) located on the north side of 6th Street,east and west of New Rochester Avenue- APN 229-261-38. H. APPROVED 5-0 H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85-06 CITY OF R,kNCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Seetion 17.02.130 of the Development Code pertaining to Non-Conforming Use. . VIL New Business I. APROM 5-0 I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-38 AJA - The development of 4 of industrial buildings totaling 63,000 square feet on 4.92 acres of land in the General industrial District (Subarea 4)located at the southeast corner of 7th Street and Archibald - APN 209-211-21,36,37. J. CONTINUED TO 2-12-85 DEVELOPMENT aREV:EW 85-43-CHRISTESON COMPANY- to allow parking issue wit '- The deve',:pment of a two-story of fice/retail building totaling Edwards Cinema to be resolved 21,000 square feet within an approved integrated business by City Council. center (Virginia Dare) in the General Commercial District located at the northwest quadrant of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avz.ue-APN 1077-661-6. K. CONSISTENT WITH K. PRELIML•AR.Y REVIEW 85-84 VINEYARD NATIONAL POLICIES 5-0 BANK A consistency determination betwe(' the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies and a proposed expansion of an existing bank building located at 9590 FOOL01 Boulevard, formc-dy r.,acupied by Wilmington Savings and L.)an. L. APPROVED 5-0 L, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-28 -- HAVEN AVENUE FOOD Staff to work with appli- COURT - The development of a one-story retail/restaurant cant on alternatives to 0,000 square foot)building located within the Virginia Dare screen loading area. Center at the northwest corner of Foothill and Haven on i about 13 acres in the General. Conamercisl'(GC) District - t. APN 1077-401-027. VIIL Public Comments This is the time .nd place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. i IX. Adjournment 9:45 t> The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that sset an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. The Planning Commission will adjourn to a workshop following the Design Review Committee meeting on January 16, 1986. The workshop will be held at the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, 9791 Arrow Highway, Room 4, Rancho Cucamonga, California beginning at 7:30 p.m. The topic of discussion will be the proposed shopping center at the northeast corner of Haven and Base Line(Conditional Use Permit 85-28). s 1 .. A P. -_ - ................T ..................... ................................ I 1 NA MeMwa— <NATFIT RCD,CMyIrP4R� Y COLLECE ZZ vk-i, � Ill • 1 Y,t .. •I � t r•N FMI qF ST 1 • • p 3 E a ww....r.T.,,..,_,f ^�}i•.."^�f._.:_i.«ww.wwr W,, t• 4 IH,s.k- I/ u �� �t a j 1s1 r • 9 i�i "vf �1 (1 3+ It{DNS 9JR#tf/ C3TT MALL � • • • • � 1[N'r,� = r•..i..w ... ..• yrr..r..rn _ ! t lea. 1 TOpiNI�,� • 9 1 B T 4 o • DNIARIO INIERNAlIDNAL AIRPORT' I CITY OF R/UFCHO CUCl.F OW14, � S tp:• C CITY OF . A, 1 RANCHO CUCANI_0NGN }i - a PLIVNINING Cmwmissm vII � z> i�ar7 AGEtI �� l� WEDNESDAY January 8,1986 7 00 p.m. t LIONS PARK commuNITY CENTER 9161 BASE Ll" RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CAk"ORKIA L Pledge of Allegiance H. Roll Call Commissioner Barker Commissioner RempPl Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Stout Commissioner McNiel l3L Announcements Selection of Civic Center Subcommittee Design Review Cominittee Rotation. IV. Approval of Minutes November 27,1985 December 11,19K V.- Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any items it should be removed for discussion A. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10076 - LIGHTNER DEVELOPMENT Design Review comprising 19 single family homes on 6.9 acres(approved 19 lot subdivision TT 10076)in the Low Residential(2-4 du/ac)District located at the northeast corner of,London and Liberty APN 201- 251-050. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12577 PILGRIIyIS-A custom lot residential subdivision of 16 lots on 4.24 acres of land in the Low District(2-4 du/ac)located on the'south side of 19th Street, west of Hellmsn Avenue-APN 202-041-03 and 52. fig; ' VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized;by the Chairman and adrlress the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5'minutes per individual for each project. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-26 THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - The development of a commercial RV storage lot with mini-, warehouse on 4.4 acres of land within the Victoria Planned Community (Medium High Residential, 14-24 du/ac),located II on the north side of Base Line Road, east of the Southern t, Californie Edison Corridor-APN 227-091-42. t, D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTWUA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 85-01 THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A request to amend the. Planned Community K text for the Victoria Planned Community to allow commercial RV storage and mini-warehouse in the Medium Nigh(MH)Residential District. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-41 WEDBLAD - A request to operate a travel agency in a tenant space within an industrial office park in the Industrial Park District and Haven Avenue Overlay District,locates'at 9140 Haven Avenue,south of 7th Street- APN 209-262-17; F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-38 - VICTORY CHAPEL Non-construction Conditional Use Per�ait to establish a church in an existing building in a multi-tenant industrial park within Subarea 4 (General Industrial)of the Industrial Specific Plan,located on the northwest corner of Archibald and,7th(9618 7th Street)- APN 209--171-47. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL,MAP 9530- WALKER -T division of 7.7 acres into 2 parcels in.the General Industrial District (Subarea 13)located on the north side of 6th Street,east and west of New Rochester Avenue + APN 229-261-38. €' H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANI) DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85-06-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA An amendment to Section 17.02.130 of the Development Crxie pertaining to Non-Conforming Use. 5 f VIL Kola,Business I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-38 AJA =The development of 4 multi-tenant industrial buildings totaling 63,000 square feet on 4.92 acres of land in the General Industrial District(Subarea 4)located at the southeast corner of 7th Street and Archibald - APN 209-211-21,36, 37.' J. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-43--CHRISTESON COMPANY The development of a two-story(if ice retail building totaling 21,000 sgu_re feet within an approved'integrated business center (Virginia Dare) in the General Commercial District located at the northwest quadrant of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue-APN 1077-661-6. K. PRELIMINARY REVIEW 85-134 VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK - A consistency determination between the Foothill 'Corridor Interim Policies and a proposed expansion of an existing bank building located at 9590 Foothill Boulevud,: formerly occupied by Wilmington Savings and Loan. L. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-28 - HAVEN AVENUE FOOD COURT -The development of a one-story retaillrestaurant T.10,000 square foot)building located within the Virginia Dare Center at the northwest corner of Foothill and Haven on about 13 acres in the General Commercial (GC) District A]PN1077-401-027. VVIYL Public Comments � This is the time and place for the gensral public to address the Commisstion. Items to be discussed here are those *which do not already appear on this agenda. 1Z. Adici n'nment Tito PlantiGng Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations ` that set ara 1 Y p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that tune„t;wzy shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. The Planning Commission will adjourn to a workshop following the Design ReWew Committees meeting on January 16, 1986. The workshop will be held at the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Canter, 9491 'A.r-ow Highway, Room 4, Rancho Cucamonga, 61ulii!ornia bekgirnung at 7 30 p.m. The topic of discussion will be Ql a proposed shopping center at the northeast corner of Haven and 9i 90se Line 1"onditional Use Permit 85-28). r r 4�. i Jr I Y 7.77 ..., r � 1 1 KIYC. � P NtL 9. � CN.1fifT 11EC14M4.DIPi J � � CNaFFET , �— g,� R..Trn _• i� S.Immu \`\ �` t91h. T l i _�� �,--L..,. �- `tom + xk --------- _ _.ice Vrtfetsa E`r,%+ — ' JLICNS f • .man • • It7- T h � CNf49I0 IVfERNATICNAL AINDCR t` CITY OF 1?A:fC.!r. I rr� CITY )F RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANN; ,G 'COMMISSION MiNUT``S Regular Meeting January 8, 1986 Chairman Dennis Stout called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. Tha meeting was held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Rcsd, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Stout then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COKXjSIONERS: PRESENT: David Barker, Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNiel, Herman Rempel, Dennis Stout ABSENT;, None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Senior Planner; Bruce Cook, Associate Planner; Nancy Fong, Associate Planner; Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer; James Markman, City Attorney; Janice Reynolds, Secretary; Alar, Warren, Assistant Planner ANNOUNCEMENTS Brad Buller, City Planner, announced that the City Council had directed the selection of a Civic Center Subcommittee to be comprised of two members of the Planning Commission. Dennis Stout volunteered to serve on the Committee and Herman Rempel won the luck of the draw frr the other position. Commissioner McNie1 will serve its alternate. Mr. Buller additionally announced Design Review Committee rotations. Commissioners Chitiea and Rempec will serve on the Commercial/Industrial Committee and Commissionees Barker and McNiel will serve on the Residential/Institutional Committee. Chairman Stout will act as alternate for both Committees. Mr. Buller asked the Commissioners if February 3, 1986 would be an available date for a workshop to discuss Industrial Specific Plan amendments. The Commission agreed that this would be an acceptable date, with ".!;e exception of Commissioner Chitiea who stated that she would be out of town. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Rempel amended page 11 of the November 27, 1985' Minutes. He advised that the intent in the first paragraph was that only 30-35% of the building was being used, therefore he suggested that the remaining p_rcentage be excavated for use, Commissioner Chitiea requested that the tense be corrected on the Chairman Stout's comment following adoption of the consentcalendar. Motion: Moved by McNiel, secondeF by Chitiea, unanimously carried, to approve the November 27, 1985 Minutes as ;,mended. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to approve the December 11, 1985 Minutes as presented. CONSENT CALENDAR A. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TUCT 10076 LIGHTNER DEVELOPMENT - Design leview comps sing :CAS 1ng'-le family nomes on 6.9 acres approved 19 lot subdivision Ti 10076) in the Loin Residential (2-4 du/ac) District located at the northeast corner of LoadGn and Liberty - APN 201-251-050. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12577 - PILGRIMS - A custom lot residential subdivision or 16 lots on 4.24 acres--o-T land in the Low District (2-4 du/ac) located on the south side of 19th Street, west of Hellman Avenue - APN 202-U l-03 and 52. Chairman Stout requested that Item "A" be removed for discussion. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, unanimously carried, to adopt Item "B" of the consent calendar. Design Review for Tentative Tract 10076 - Lightner Development Chairman Stout stated that Banyan was proposed to continue across the City to Summit and was concerned with the "T" intersection which was now depicted in the current plans. Commissioner Rempel disagreed and stated that Banyan would be designed to go through if the City constructs a bridge. Commissioner Barker stated that if there was a question of how this tract was originally approved, staff should begiven direction to research that issue and continue the item for two weeks. Planning Commission Minutes -2- January 8, 1986 Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Barker, to continue Design Review for Tentative Tract 10076, Lightner Development, to: the January 22, 1986 meeting. Chairman Stout requested that the Minutes be included in the staff report, including those which were taken at the time the project was granted a time extension. Motion carried+ by the following vote: AYES:. COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE carried PUBLIC HEARINGS C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 85-01 - THE WIT_ - A request o amend the Planned Co—m—un—It—y--te-W or the Victoria ar:,-d community to allow commercial RV storage and mini-wiarehouse in the Wedium High (MH) Residea�ial District. Bruce Cook, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Mr. Cook advised that; a letter had been received from Ms. Elena, an adjacent proper*�v owner, opposing project due to incompatibility with her property. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Steven Ford; William Lyon Company, stated concurrence with the findings of the staff report, Resolution and Conditions of Approval. Chairman Stout asked if the applicant anticipated the need for more of these types of facilities. Mr. fiord replied that the Community Plan provides for an annual rev-'few to evaluate the nea' 'He advised that the William Lyon Company anticipates t< participating in chat type of review to monitor the reed. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed.. Chairman Barker stated that he was not opposed to the a use. Commissioner Rempel stated that he was not opposed. `` 0mmissioner 'McNiel stated that he was not opposed to the use, but that there t� s'houl d be a prevision that in such case that a private business fails, the I responsibility falls om--tha homeowners association to maintain the property. 'Commissioner Chitiea stated that the use was-appropriate and that interi-ar storage is necessary for the community. -3 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 1986 Chairman Stout concurred and asked the City Attorney if there would be a way to mitigate Liammissioner McNiel`s concern.- James Markman, City Attorney°_ advised that the applicant is probably going to transfer title to another en0 zy. He stated that there may be a problem in what constitu ,s failure. Additionally, if this were the last property to be developed, he would consider it more of a problem but there are other properties to be developed, which would give the City some control. Brad Buller, City Planner, advised that the property maintenrince issue would be controlled through the City's code enforcement process. He additionally advised that staff developed some development critiea or standards for mini warehouses which were inc;uded in the resolution for this project. Ne asked the Commission if these conditions would be acceptable as the standard criteria for mini-warehouses. I' It,was the consensus of the Commission that these standards were acceptable. Motions Moved by Barker, seconded by MGNiel, to adopt the Resolution recommending issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of Victoria Planned Community Amendment 85-01 to the City Council. Motion carried by the following qute: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, MCHIEL, CHITIEA, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried D. ENVIRONMENTAL �.SSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-26 - THE WILLIAM e development of a commercial RV storage o wT tT—miff-- warehouse—on 4.4 acres of land within the Victoria Planned Community (Medium High Residential, 14-24 du/ac), located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of the Southern California Edison Corridor - AP`! 227-091- 42. Bruce Cook, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman. Stout opened the public hearing. Steven Ford, William Lyon Company, stated concurrence with findings of the staff report, Resolution and Conditions of Approval. He asked that it be clarified that roofing material on the caretaker's quarters would be tile; however, the roofing -of the actual storage area would be metal for fire protection. Planning Commission Minutes -4- January &, 1986 6 Commissioner Chitiea asked if the applicant had time to make modifications to the circulation system after Design Review. She was concerned tnat the present spaces show only 17 spaces where someone could easily back a boat, trailer, or camper unit to be dropped. Mr. Ford replied that the architect had worked an the circulation pattern with respect to the tray in which parking spaces orient to driveways; however, those modifications had not been included in this packet and ware not required to be resubmitted prior to this meeting. Commissioner Barker agreed that some changes were suggested at Design Review and was concerned that the packet did not include revisions and that colored renderings were not provided. Commissioner Chitiea asked how the dump station and water fill-up areas had been designed. Stewart Calderon, project architect, advised specific designs had not been developed. He stated that the attempt would be to have at least three wash racks and two spaces for dumping so that 5 RV's during peak hours could be accommodated. Mr. Calderon outlined the area on the overhead exhibit. Chairman Stout stated that the Design Review Committee expressed concern about the exterior wall and recommended that some type of landscaping treatment, recessing of the wall in certain areas to accommodate landscaping, and the use of a combination of materials. He asked if those recommendations had begin included in the final plans. Mr. Calderon stated that pilasters would be used to break up the expanse of the wall and that vines would also be used. Further, a brick cap was propused for the top of the wall. s Chairman Stout questioned the landscaping maintenance along the perimeter walls. CC Mr. Calderon advised that irrigation would be through the use of drip lines. Chairman Stout stated concern with not seeing final renderings. Brad Buller, City planner, suggested that the Commission consider one of two actions; to continue the item in order for the project to return to the Design Review Committee for fine-tuning, or if they felt comfortable enough to act on the project at this meeting, certain items of the resolution could be conditioned to return to the Design Review Committee for final approval. Commissioner Barker replied that he would rather condition the Resolution that €; Design Review Committee give final approval rather than holdup the project. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. planning Commission Minutes -5- January 8s 1986 Commissioner Chitiea stated that the use is appropriate; however, the design cr'teria would have to go back to the Design Review Committee. Commissioner Barker agreed. Chairman Stout stated that placing a few vines on the wall would not solve the problem of the expanse of the wall. Regarding changing material, he stated that since the building is long and linear, his concern would be more with the material change being ver:ically rather than merely a cap change and that his thought would be to Mack it off wit different sections. Commissioner Rempel referred to the letter from the adjacent prope ty owner, and stated that since that property is medium high density it would mean the property would hale a fairly dense project and might benefit from this project. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution with modifications to conditions 7, 10, 11 regcrding design issues are to be reviewed by the n,�_ qn Review Committee, and a modification to condition 9 stating th4t all roofing material on the caretaker's quarters is to be tile. Motion carrie:i by the folloding vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONF ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE carried E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-41 - WEDBLAD - A request to operate a travel agency in a 4jinant space within an in�i;r1:0 office park in the Industrial 'Park Disti :ct and Haven Avenue Over+ay District, located at 9140 Haven Avenue, south of 6th Street - APH 200i-262- 17. E Alan Warren, Assistant Planner, reviewed the .staff report. Commissioner Chitiea asked if staff saw a need for limiting hours on Satuedays r to 4:00 p.m. `a Mr. Warren replied that the applicant stated that this would be his hours of operation. Further, the fact that the conditional use permit runs with the site*and that another travel Pnency could relocaep to this building, staff felt that it would be appropriate to place this condition on the permit. Commissioner McNiel questioned the available parking spaces in comparison to leasable space within the complex: tea. Planning Commission Minutes -6- January 8, 1986 za•._ Mr. Warren replied �aat a break down of the area had not been prepared; however, in a previous -approval the owner of the property has guaranteed additional parking on a parcel to the south upon expansion of the development. Commissioner Rempel stated this type of use is what was envisioned in this Subarea and questioned why_th2 applicant was required to submit a conditional use permit for review. Chairman Stout stated that the conditional use permit process is an overlay district requirement. He then opened the public hearing. Lloyd Wedblad, applicant, gave an overview of the project. Mr. Wedblad supported the conditional use permit process in that he felt notification of surrounding businesses and review by staff and the Commission was beneficial to surrounding businesses. Mr. Wedblad questioned the condition regarding hours of operation and requested that he :;.nt be restricted. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Chairman Stout stated that if the hours of operation were conditioned due to parking conflicts, he could see the necessity; however, this operation would use such low intensity he could not see the need to limit his hours of operation. Commissioner Barker sugg€sted that condition one be removed in total and further stated that he did not have a concern with the proposal. Commissioner Rempel stated that he had no problem with this use since it was intended in this Subarea and felt that a Conditional Use Permit should not be required. Commissioner Chitiea suppor—' the project and stated that it would have minimum impact and be an ap, ate use. Chairman Stout sated that thi, .gin acceptable type-of use, and didn`t see a problem with the process. Commissioner McNiel supported the tr7-vel agency and suggested staff determine if a conditional use permit should be required. Brad Buller, City Planner, advised that the Haven. Avenue Overlay District requires a conditional use permit for this type of use; however, if the Commission did not believe a conditional use permit should be required, staff could research the language and possibly bring modifications back before the Commission. Commissioner Chltyea stated that the question was not whether or not the use was appropriate, but how much is appropriate irr a complex before the nature of the office professional support is changed to the primary commercial use. Further, that it was not intended to exclude uses, but to control them. "anning Commission Minutes -7- January 8t 1986 Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by McNiel, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution app;•oving-Conditional Use Permit �5-4i' with the elimination of c:.Nndition one. Section 3'"was modified to read that the conditional use pe_rmii: is hereby approved. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, BARKER, REMPE:., STOUT NOES: COMMIP"' RS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Commissioner Rempel stated that the requirement for a Conditional Use Permit for travel agencies is not in the best interest of the community and requested that the issue be brought back before the Ccnmission. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-38 - VICTORY CHAPEL - Non-construction Conditional Use Permit to establish a Church in an er c "ig building in a multi-�.enant industrial park within Subarea 4 (G al Industrial) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the n(- ves`. corner of Archibald and 7th (9618 7th Street) - APN 209-171- a^ C'r ,rman „tout announced that the applicant for this item requested a cot,tisiusnce to the January 22, 1986 meeting. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Motion Moved by Rempal, seconded by Barker, to continue the public hearing for Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 85-38 to the January 22, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES:. COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, STOUT I NOES: COMMISSIONERS: {NONE ° ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: WORE -carried G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9530 WALKER - A'division of 7.7 acres into o 2 parceis in the enera n ustr5a jstrict (Subarea 13) located on the north .side of 6th Street, east and west of New Rochester Avenue - APN 229-2.61-38. Planning Commission Minutes -8- January 8, 1986 c Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, advised that the applicant for this item had requested a continuance to `the January 22, .1936 Planning Commission meeting. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, to continue the public hearing for Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 9350 to the January 22, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE carried 8:20 p.m. Planning Commission Recessed 8:30 p.m. - Planning Commission Reconvened with all members present H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES F°7ENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85-06 - CITY OF RANCHO =',MGNGA n amendment o ection 17.02.130 of the eve opm Code perhalnT—r-,j to Non-Conforming Use. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. i Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There were no comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Barker suggested that the new txt be modified to read that the Planning Commission could approve or consi ft- a request. James Markman, City Attorney, suggested further modification to read "approve or conditionally approve". Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and adoption of the Ordinance approving Environmental Assessment and Development Code Amendment 85-06 to the City Council with the modification to the new text to read "approve or conditionally approve". Motion carried by the following vote: AYES. COMMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Planning Commission Minutes -9- January 8, 1986 NEW BUSINESS I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEH 85-38 - AJA - The eve opment of 4 multi-tenant industrial bui ings totaling square feet on 4.92 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) located at the southeast corner of 7th Strec;t and Archibald - APN 209-211- 21, 36, 37. Nancy Fong, c,­,ociate Planner, reviewed the staff report. M- Fong suggested word changes -to condition 6 of the Resolution. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Franz Nalezny, Aja A Associates, concurred with the findings of the staff report, Resolution and Conditions of approval. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Chitiea stated that the applicant made significant design improvements 'to this project which will better serve the users of the complex, and enhance Archibald. Chairman Stout agreed and further stated that Archibald is getting to be a problem with the strip commercial look and that this project is, an excellent _ example of how that can be broken up. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Rempel, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 85-38, with a modification to condition 6 to read "an that the existing well site drive approach along '7th Street be removed". Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, REMPEL, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried J. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-43 - CHRISTESON COMPANY - The development of a two- story o ice re ai building o aiing 21�00 square feet within an approved integrated business center (Virginia Dare) in the General Commercial District located at the northwest quadrant of Foothill Boulevard and Haven.Avenue - APN 1077-661-6. Nancy Fong, Associate Planner, reviewed the staf? report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -10- January 8, 1986 Glen Gellatly, Bissel Architects, stated concern with thi condition requiring a pedestrian connection to the Del ',aco Restaurant. Ms. Fong stated that previous conditions state that the developers of Virginia Dare and Brunswick work together to; find a workable solution for the connection. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. James Markman, City Attorney, provided an update on the parking situation and advised that a Development Agreement is being worked on with the 'developer. He further advised that an appeal has been made by the applicant on the parking issue and scheduled for public hearing before the City Council on February 5, 1986. He stated that staff does not know which parking condition will apply and flow it will affect the office building now before the Commission therefore,-Staff's position was to continue review of this item until the first meeting in February to have this issue resolved: Chairman Stout reopened the public hearing. Glen Gellatly stated his understanding that the concern was with all three properties and it was agreed to that the building at the southwest was the questionable building regarding parking and the building to the northeast was small enough that parking was not an issue. Therefore, felt that this building should be exempt. Mr. Markman stated that the building was not specified the only thing that was specified was that a single office building could be developed if it only required 85 parkins spaces or less and the cinema parking would be assured. Further,-that this approval would have validated this project; however, the appeal by the developer invalidated the Planning Commission's decision. David Micheal, representing the applicant, stated that from all indications there would not: be any problems with the develr^ment agreement. Further, 60,000 to 80,000 square feet of buildable space remain to be built out in the complex and Felt that this would provided plenty of cushion for the Development Agreement to Je exercised. There were no further comments. Motion: Ehved by Chitiea, seconded by McNiei, to continue the public hearing for Develorynent Review 85-43 to the February 12, 1986 Planning Co u ission meeting. Minion carried by the following voter AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, BARKER, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: WT', ,SIONERS: NONE -carried- Plannina Commission Minutes -11 January 8,.1986 1%r K. PRELININARY REVIEW 85-84 - VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK A consistency e errmination—'L:%een a oot r orri or nterim Policies and a proposed expansion of an existing bank building located at 9590 Foothill Boulevard, formerly occupied by Wilmington Savings and Loan. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Steven Sensenbach, applicant, gave an overview of the project. Commissioner Barker asked if the architect could discuss ;how the proposed design could with link the Wendy s plaza to the west. Tom Harris, architect, stated that in the short time al.ailable that problem' had not been addressed and that the only issue addressed was what to do with the Wilmington Savings & Loan building to turn it into s viable project. Commissioner Barker advised that one of the concepts behind the Foothill Study is to master plan developmenr^ along the corridor. Commissioner Rempel stated that the upgrade of this site is exactly what the City wants out of the Foothill Corridor Study. However, this was not to say that the rough plan presented is exactly the plan which will be approved.agreed that He 9 t this is a feasible project for Vineyard Bank to r=—Sue. Commissioner Chitiea agreed that at the preliminary stage, the consistency uatermination could be made. Commissioner McNiel concurred. Chairman Stout stated that when this procedure was established the intent was not to shut down all development on Foothill until completion of the study; it was realized ;hat there were certain situations and sites that would lend themselves to immediate development. He Found the proposal consistent with the Interim Policies, but noted that the archi,ecture and site plan may need adjustments and possibly reassessment of the drive throughs. He felt those were minor technical aspects which could be worked out later in the process. Mr. Sensenbach stated; that relocating the drive throughs is not a minor accomplishment and w,sl-+ cost upward of $75,000 to relocate. He advised that there are currently three drive through spaces and Vineyard Bank plans .to expand' to four. Further, that in working on this site it was important to come to an understanding that it would be allowable to expand the existing drive through fac1lities and not relocate them since this issue would be of major- consideration in continuing this project. He advised that the drive throughs would continue to exit out onto Foothill and stack to the rear of the building. Planning Commission Minutes -12 January 8, 1986 r: Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that the access policy is not to allow access onto major streets-when an alternativq side street could be used. He was concerned that this project has not gone throu�.7h the technical review process. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that the conceptual plan in the packet and the preliminary plans presented by the applicant this evening must be reviewed further. It would be difficult to make any kind of judgment on the technical issues such as driveways, circulation patterns, and architectural concepts until mc,e precise plans can go through the technical review process. Chairman Stout reiterated that at the Planning Commission level this proposal was seen as an improvement and the Commission conceptually agrees with the proposal. L. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-28 - HAVEN AVENUE FOOD COURT - The deveiopment of a one-story retai restaurant _ square oo rlding located within the Virginia Bare Center at the northwest corner of Foothill and Haven on about 13 acres in the General Commercial (GC) District - APN 1077-401-027. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. . Commissioner Chitiea questioned the centered reveals renuired by the Design Review Committee. Brad Buller, City Planner, replied that Exhibit 0-2 depicted the applicant's revisions. He a?,Ised that his recollection from that meeting was that the Committee discussed the centering on the section of the wall which is parallel to the parking, not between the existing building and the end of the building as proposed. He also raised a concern with the balance of landscaping along the south elevation. Chairman. Stout invited public comment. x Glen Ge'llatly, project architect, explained why the reveals had been centered as shown on Exhibit C-2. He further noted that the trees along the south building elevation are centered between parking stalls and that a fire hydrant location determined the size of tfe landscaped areas adjacent to the grape crusher building. Mr. Buller advised that staff would work with the applicant on the south °x elevation, if the Commission desired. Commissioner Chitiea suggested that landscaping be expanded into the fourth space-which would eliminate that space and give more landscaping. She asked if this would be a problem. Planning Commission Minutes -13- January 8, 1986 Mr. Gellatly replied that it would be a problem and could not speak for the developer by indicating it would be alright to eliminate a parking space. He advised that this elevation would be the service side, since the main entrance would be off of Haven. There were no further comments. Commissioner Chitiea stated that the parking space should be eliminated a,!& the landscaping increL ed. Commissioner McNiel was satisfied with the design and did not see this as a major issue. Commissioner Barker considered it a major issue and suggested that staff be directed to worn on a solution with the applicant. Commissioner Rempel stated that many projects have gone through undue limits trying; to shield loading zo;aef and trash areas from view. He was concerned that",.his project places it out in open view and there is no place on the site for loading and cleaning. , He felt that the opening to the south should be totaly screened. " Chairman Stout stated that the problem is.that the City designated the crusher building as historical and wanted it visible; however, the applicant didn't need the space, therefr-e decided to integrate it into their restaurant by making it a service enti-y. Commissioner Rempel stated that trucks should' not be parking out in the driveway and there should be an area to the west to use as a dock area which might necessitate the loss of six parking spaces. He suggested that staff be directed to work with the applicant on a driveway loading area which is fully screened. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Barker, to adopt the Resolution approving Development Review 85--28 with direction to staff to work with the applicant on the 'development of a driveway loading area which is fully � screened. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE- -carried ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, unanimously earned, to adjourn. f Planning Commission Minutes -14- January 8, 1986 r._ �t The,Planning Commission adjourned to a workshop following the Design Review Committee meeting on January 16, -11986. Thp workshop will be held at the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, 9791 Arrow Highway, Room 4, Rancho Cucamonga, California beginning at 7:30 p.m. The topic of discussion will be the proposed shopping center at the no.theast corner of Haven and Base Line (Conditional Use Permit 85-28). 9:40 p.m. - Planning Commission Adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Deputy Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -15- January 8, 1986 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cuCnMo� } STAFF REPORT rC c a� r O1 O { . O. a 1977 DATE: January 8, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10076 LIG!iTNER DEVELOPMENT Design review comprising 19 single-family homes on 6.9 acres (approved 19 lot subdivision TT 10076) in the Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) District located at the northeast corner of London and Liberty - APN 201-251-050. I. BACKGROUND: On August 25, 1982, the Planning Commission approved a tract subdivision only for Tract 10076. The applieilnt is now requesting review and approval of design elevations for 19 single family homes. This review will comprise the second phase of residential construction in the immediate area. The first phase under Tentative Tract 12523 is directly south and is fully constructed with units currently being sold. II. ANALYSIS: - A. General: The elevations have a contemporary style of architecture incorporating stucco exteriors, red and gray tile roof material, brick veneer, and wood plant-ons. Some units will hav'Q a chimney feature, which is consistent with Phase I (Tentative Tract 12523). All units will present staggered (t 5 feet) front yard setbacks for visual interest. There are three one-story elevations and 1 two-story elevation, with 2 floor plans per elevation for a total of 8 different product '^?pes. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the design elevations and recommended approval subject to upgrading the architectural detailing around the windows (west elevation 1600 series) for unit on Lot 8 (Banyan Street). The Committee also required a sight line study for units on the south side of Banyan Street looking southerly to the rear elevations of units on Liberty Street. The results of the sight-line study (Exhibit "F") indicate that views into rear yards will occur from 2-story units on the southside of Banyan. Two mitigation e measures are suggested: 1) plotting single story units only on the southerly side of Banyan, (Condition #9), or 2) dense tree yrlanting along fence line, (Condition #10). The 4 ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT January 8, 1986 Tentative Tract 10076 - Lightner Page 2 conceptual landscape plan (Exhibit "D") proposes. a total of 156 five-gallon Western Redbud trees on the slope. A row c: 15 gallon size Evergreen trees are recommended for planting on the north side of the fence. A 6-foot high wood fence will be placed at the top of the slope with minimum 3-foot landing (see Exhibit "F"). Finally, the Committee recommended provision for landscaping maintenance by homeowners for Lots 6 and 7 b'd Banyan Street until future street connection is made. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning gommission approve the design elevations through adoption of the attached r resolution. 1 L Respectfully submitted, l Brad Buller City Planner BB-HF:das Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations Sxhibit "D" - Landscaping Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Sight-line Study ` Resolution with Conditions ' Previously Approved Resolution with Conditions for Tentative Tract 10076 t I tc 1 t 3 _? 1 t 4 r 1 a r r Ili Wear [C�. G I V 1+ la • � i t r-4ORTH CITY OF ITG RANCHO CU CAMOp GA P..flW-11NU I3I'VLSIC',t\4 EXHIBIT SCALE. • Y t t ♦ � Ia a 0 L70: El .P Ell IF a , f: 4 Ell 1 q 6i I \ I Ell 1 r � � qI E 4�t: LiC i � ©ElFTH DE F l , or-.0 j M- IN! r E A r 5 s E Y f • a a 9r' F L R t I if _ its T i i rill i t S 41 f t 1 ;•i�li i A i,lil iE Cl • ❑ � ail 'I ❑ I � F � I D' 3 0 4 I I s t r t ; Sri 1El i Viz-•��-. E L�4 T. { 412 t x C ' oM,� y 0 i, In l� i a I t I Ili, � �—• ---a I c i IN \\ z Ia i r t _ I i.3yys^s��ii63� 3 ti j KyI^w1 �Y.� lit e no z f • o L01 M1('•� 6.4 r' f 111 ati tS ,i�L_s }t£rr iL.lz ! r•lie j" p r - t yg 7z'. t' a lri�E i C• 1 ;.$� a !{1dt�'[i?1p�� � a9 i r r�LAwnNo PLAN n•+�•.. L15-- J L w ce4711ti� F+arneawamr r [T70 trr-t7NL ..� �� or 4 . 1 �r Y I _L 11 i .ice � t 1 --r.ma —�•�: F�i it -�..:•..:.ram-.�, - =—• �'r a i Ibi 'u a •� 1 W i M_ay m jxOW I I t j RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO,CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DFSIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10076 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LONDON AND ;I&ERTY IN THE 'LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 13th day of November, 1985, a complete application was filed by Lightner Development for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of January, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3• That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Corte, and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental t the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in : ne vicinity. SECTION 2: Tbat Design F.eview for Tract 10076 is approved subject to the following cond_ fans and attached Standard Cmnditions: 1. All 'pertinent conditions of Tract 10076 as contained in Resolution 82-81 shall apply. 2. All perimeter block walls as shown on the conceptual grading shall be provided for as indicated. 3• A 6-foot high 'wooden fence shall be placed a, the top of the slope with minimum 3-foot landing, ,as shown on Exhibit "F°, sight-line study section. Aft 4. All fencing shall be consistent with design and materials on first phase (Tract 12523). G PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION January 8, 1986 Tentative Tract 10076 - Lightner Dev. Page 2 Aft 5. Provision shall be made for landscaping maintnance by homeowner for Lots 6 and 7 on Banyan Street, until future street connection is made, subject to review and approval by City Planner prior to building permit issuance. 6. Developer shall be required to provide additional architectural detailing to all corner units along London Avenue, and construct corner-side yard and return walls with consistent masonry materials. 7. Developer shall provide additional architectural treatment to west elevation of 160D series unit on Lot 8 (Banyan Street). 8. Material sample board shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval, prior to building permit issuance. '41 9. Developer shall only plot one-story units along the � south side of Banyan as mitigation measure for vtcews into rear yards to the south. r10. A dense planting of 15 gallkjn size Evergreen trees shall be planted along the north side of the fence at the rear of lots 7-13• APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Puller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of January, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: y o O E •y q r ip oa Ud. A c cnL F dY p Loc T •�du. dqw. u Y n�.0 nu t Yoi 111111 y OiG U OCL cY L V.q O ET6 O nC .G 6cY M v q� E? o q �— u Np Ea C d U.uY-9n >C L up�a fJ /� V ZO "rn+-U�n y VY �,o ^moo. p yt B E A-i =ie«u d Y �O d Y q C. O.6 u.€�u•.�. •� pdY _ aUsy EC E EE a.^.• Us Ts € �Y a NN pLLA dr iF u ig`UNYQ �. Y � LY p. A G6Uq dU • CON C•wa C a-ds °• moo. c nay. _ eo,_•N-��u _- Vu�OEEGOY.A�-.N >p L� 6Ly Fa 'G•wio A a^.q� 6 U GLi adi 6OY 0.�.. L MpY ;q N L gg y d q C a O C gg ^ t d n G •�Y d T O.a n.Cyp >>.E p 06 O O a96 p O, Y ^L U • F V y o y O:pl q P Y.Y � N V L. Y\4 fi Q^ t T c u N O.Ln 0 C.O Y Odd Y p YU t1c.•`-Su��9w ZY.E. �6 A` Ow�a np"T uV CCdu pGp �M L4.1 q6V 2•pn pig 1�OOd..N CYi� sN�Y\t 60 _ Ft.6L 6U m 14 W U o 09.J. LLO E nn J p� 'I O •I a O c^ E U a o L np9 u d > a OI C Y N dd aq`t >q y AEE NiOUT�.^ 3 .ACG. o V c0•vd So c a o T. WIA V C�L u r u uo i J GanU O T '..pu LuU0 v. I c o • o � ' ._ p� a m e cq�L Lda C d N a 6.o °•s 0 y O G V G Z ~ d E ... � � � p .gyp. g d `n �� �•Y'` x "n 11 V L u q L O ni ` O O CO Oua p c o n >p q L m ca.Ld.q {� _ n. Tpp • � 2a�T o ¢ A r A ti..N.=w A NL w.N.. �. 4y L o u I I I \\'•\\ll I 8 rl • ��wat11 cegd rnu ar_r L^.d s..vuv mod« c��.o. da , G w� Yp OOO.i01r V4p U E Yw� O•x WH C� i •/�^�`. dy C x q G Np9a �C O04pW .0, O •��l e E d:„ L L O A Oyy O a�p j p n> pp d y r p t« L pCC N • M ' ,a • d d T L L L p.gg p L N T d.4^ q w. A^ nx N 4„t .nea N� '^« o.t s�txd yTc ate,_ ve .. �+o V yC C� C�W C NQ N p0 L aW.A LOL •_ OR E.6 G) o 'yV 40. LaoA Vh wGL y �q•.,ay Nw C t AEi' C A .O O.w aN01d=N N W i.q6 «j0 � N L �O Y Y O q a C 2 e r 11n F•M O lV V A r i q.n'V O' V L y N a A SO OOL y�V4 Nd EECOO O`f� MNpLd.U�r. hN p.N dy yNq A' CEGC. '^ .c.O c�.•.WdON�x� b.��«^d LY E ACO,O -9 np CL '� O.^ �gjLq Na=. M.y• O. Wy0 $u ^� aq Cxp Oqu.O1 }. m0 OAf�C dY0 Y�CL A O Cf.u^ LO ^Y.AA • Yo W E L a =d .aN W WOOd Ygg>u.^-• O_�NSEO zC i. dV y.d OIONV� `N q A' N O I C L Y 0 0 .-•O Y y a'M O d •C y.. .^o A ."c«a Ad « Y .�o a`u. 9n�„ nALl�r ���tlL ` Y ^01EE OpM. p'q. OIO CN.2 C ISm HH SMN ECEUaaa >nd E OY N •�... q L Y A Y C A A E 6 O O� y Y Y V^ V C ee o eL _ qc 6 E�66 ¢:N'uu Ny N.NLII S.Li.Yt] dr.Or.N.Oi.WL.O•�p Yea-..'•-. ^ O G 2 A:LAYa Nd0 i-E + I I .YI FYI {Y� (AI PI Yfl ti t RE YZ ` d> . A p4 .ypY.p .^.��� <'^y.N ,-ooY.T.=,a O pp �O A Zvi G Y Oq^MY�y N OL :V 2^ V 'o Lo^ AW >.�r= L o Ao. oafs E'z L L y d l V O O q.S. w a C p c w'.c�,e " �."E W '.O Y A d M G y n L A` Y A•Cl N d��o.A, a E d y q`N cL Y rcE,gNNc Ni^ o N N JOi^9 .O Cqq O Arc .O G ILEE S O O O Met d _ a LO�y 6L YO.0 VL.r d01. ' M o.Oa aO CY. �V..G'^a0 VCOOE «.,d CO O' � a qA C CnC dV, �C• AY .p N c14� qS.6 ed -2:52 N`ggd �aY CyO N y= .Li 2p y ... « • L.Q L� <= O u T Y2 OVEN s v v.a .V y L ,0 W C c o. c aq no i ~ �u oaA xno.'o�' ^aoa o. viq�o td L^ N^ O rC CC S' V V�d.Lq cE OOy O yY t t o d N i .1A Q v 6Q N E C y C L L ^cam aZ; N ..di o9. pa vas �� cE c Ano.A c nq o.�w� NL w�. � 9 L9 Ny0 d yLy•.•M.n:=.. C .�. �L.d.t9n�G Cy'Cji .' =J A C dy C ti pggL O. N LGZ C 000 u a E�ei�C,cW .O ` .=idQY E •`W p 6 Lp S.0 p L.0 • F.�� R w V L AE�O p C 01 c p V C n.t C g q d n 0 q. C C C .III r p.q>� LE VYp C iaWQ VLiO. fOi G> N e n d 6NOLG ~NS H.CMCiOO Q.�•N� NO K,a .O.I�p nd i�0��� 1-•S.x CA cn . f9-17 aogo. .moo u a� o.ci. Y�� >,qM era=. Lv c o Y 000Dq �CNIL. � g'> _ o u aY. A. p22 DYO~ `Y Q.D L CY WV Y. VN M �O qp r1Y~q nm.d Mnc � c I$ V w Y g N p I u O d 0 ,T LO W L Ad O aN r NN C S. Y y cv^nnu Nor'"in ay'` ovDi°N c ~�."u U 'o LFa'^ `c. Biq a =e w-u No o�N�'caY _r. oN cv .o naM �`�. r0 agog NtXI ^ap'o u o.i NpY aau $^ ep ny ecd. jY�as n pp aaC U O L�-O L.9 "MN C^, N06 g AY a Np L d uy. La M V rpN C w. W n�Y o N p N >O O �=pf a E y L.CLI O a 'rt T q d O e i 6p ...d e L U O n�L nY 6 Ly�d Y Q L q `Y d r O� O� e p �pND o�xl H 1; ZE aY ep u=< oL> ece, Yn NYC ncn^ YnD nun D' vc� a Trnn«.L+ c.n aH c�L ua +.be,,-Y.c c' .c>'� + SAL od ¢vni 3No F=Nr 4N.u.-.- N o D mo.N I I I I t M 1 .auD pro a u� L Oq—d c a oq. LaC d w a 5 a.2tl. >= NNu Y^M a M Y ^O O u a L q= �N 06 =r _R C Yn O.•'O. lZC O:aol pU� N N O.Y- dnu NG uCp Fiq`gL 5 F L O G e N� YNyN O Cc p CIS^ o O TT Z. N cub YT— AC CT ^ a N an O t NgtY dN ' O:;Y Lu6 o Y�Cf.p V e Y �uur ...�o Yzo _ `c ^axi u oac yL.pc Y N� q E6� on $a Ac Lp Y s cs nncN �Y ocv UD^Lda 'Di E U q p O m C•• C a L Ly N� G ^qNT L o NY Y Hunu­w � e q p p Is U ^ L C 'Y Np Yam: 7. u.D V .N ' OA a Ye q,,^ n Y G ' L.. nN Z r m u iJ YE n 6L L r N L f ¢ O. ¢C w.m ? t • �. 11 tl 4AI p NI s . � d 2: _l G L N u «p u• N d tl\ E E E 9 T LOY6 aKAdmL •.1 _ d GO:+E Li u q j a ^tb. `��A x L Cd uN °i o� �. E nY O qp E-nN� NdT h"i` -G' AO nO N W 6 u 6 N 44 �/(yy�\ ��q LG.4. • LY EN dd 4.. b0 add. Gd ' to 6 q V A N Z d E f_ b p 111 FF G 3 _N qqO L .•4. \Yvy\\I L �.Eq ¢U 00 pq �ngA _y O bd S. S O C• d O v d ii 4 d C J t EI L T p, d 6 LTY ..E..N LA y Gdm O C Y T G AEOC i S 2LpiuY C u q db Y > �N t- Y • ^VO. x' L qV ^O VL-LO W A+'Q O C9 L a G• Ny -Gg.M 4 C nA F d W pp C � G YT N T t 2 0 C L pp d L EC '^ A N O� u tOi NE L^Ai�cam. d U 3.>. NCg 4 u -L m b U N Lac6Fi �Ct EO b q GOY O A E.4 A 6 6 L G Cl C j S 6 C N a 9 H Y E A Y C d 6aaPi ��0. bOdC AV b^ ��l.0 bl +O• d LO E V p�Q L t�nVA H6 O !L-An n�i O �Uyy^yyL d c6al�N 6�q L 6tid �•I tOI. ��I �� � N nl til I I � W rLI o s L a aV OCO Senn mN ^a Y� u- 9 qL Y A d R ^V A Q.p L Mr n G j Q q Ny dl: d "o O ' �Sua Lq L maw b E.M N c N O O O L O .. O v.. Y A O A NgCE. « 9t N= NL l.. } O bT p 3 c,:o Lt O. ^� dL NiiA ode =c :q c EeE `a. Y Gy CG E6 .O fir. aL ..•G !.I VM n L=q Ems..Al Y U 2 SL LM E L G yt.�. i^m du�L dA 0, . 0 Lsic Eatn Z.S n yQ Y`,Ou W C..EE O Ew cC i Y-Og O d9dx bN A dpN Y••- Vp6u �Y`n - ^ 6N ye E' dQ.N p� q6V� p. YAq E L = n .,, rn " W. b^aqi 2. aM .q N.« CSC C G •r y G E q pd i yN d -T 2 .- €. 0 4 E�.C. L q 2 O o P. Y d i q u T 'L c a N a C C N O u C V d V m Y `T- L C '•.` '� do 1v.r L O d Z. L �.V.. b OZ N N n6 t tt-Na Vu vn1x��� JLE.- Q != c��- 4Frm Cu L•Ei WES Oaai M.y h-i9 roo vcc=yL .aa d docc- �.« om C.. NE t.AO S7 �O Y i d0• a� Y. A N U �a N 10 Z C� ax CO Fh CaLI ON n W y�6~ d�Y q O. •n L O 4 Cl,. w d utf T DP 9 c 0� a t N c E w G. dN E6% Y Y m Ct T E W a Eq an L Ed N d 9 a C Y�. dygj a+ iJ d C o p 9 V C y L ^ d L p q mmooc a L o,a. n o LL COCU QO YOT O 2 N V.2 d L.q LYO.. 6A M �6 QN O-LLa 6 Vim. o L N fA Z W J ' L t 9a. C C a ld] O N • Y T p p V E 9 L n N Y _ < G ' A Sq T - =EE i O d�U Y L 2 9 q P. �•2d p N a 9. Aa L aofi v ?� Wtn q r�i • • d 5 Qq C^ y 0« 0 q TO. q 0 a n M9 •^� a n A 6 •f �� o E d C v V a^ Yq cNrn a ,aY; o. ec vA T cam E Y€ n€ Ta dN cy~d€ C '~ O>'O+� d0 i yy. ��' .BUS C T Y.O v�C YV LL nVa RO yo d.L C. dN 'E'60d a.l N e 09. u _ 6� AQ .A n p601 E p0 p yO y j aU. n Lo 6 4y.. a o.q a!�� a r• N -A. N9 Lp cp N Lp,. 0 9� d O a N C E d 2 Y E >�U C 6 L O d O p G N iN aE u.ac� ypp o + „ CFF CtA O U4« N EL O� u V V01UCN� QAA L] 06`••E�"'i N O O..d� ¢9 A. .Li N d A p L A T n N Y f 0 1 Ni 14I s O.j p N � t u 0 q� a� ,a E V y.Z•.. � i N � q`L^Y a•d.L. CY N. V • Y 17L. x pn -.c u d zo u.et i ja 2Ly A� o dTEN va dY w cio� :tea uoo cU o u n 4, L W O.� +.0 L4••'a x� '. U� d, T^ y'� 9yy C N^ C L9 W L 01N 7: CN U �> C•^ p N �d� � LUA Y �O •.. C Y �� 9^L C —�O C�.. Cull y C u L �'i' Z•• GN E N C q d 2 C. O y y.dcC O W D.' E.Qa a a.f O N. L Qa L. Odd O 6y^ N q•,,,. a O E �ueo q dd NUUL gi.L N^W UY api L as N T m a G x O N Y u W C a Ot u V O 0 P € C a 6 6 dL 'T n N6W ie QG.M NO I T N9. dwa• Eta .- N L lU S 6 Uy Q y0.,. b a7 Q ti • N �� _y ol N p c u M Nd ,LOW � -y. y. <6 — � T >,L•i i a c v zm SU u E nC.C- 2N �� o Chi d 6 t O O •n U.0 ^ S.. d r. L O cN ¢ a « u as e� 55- 0o co vd sro Wz Y co o¢ dE n y o b EC� EEp 2u. C Ol..py^ C. ud .0 a' 'o m pa 10 Ud OOy 0= =Z O>7 Q6 E O d TA L. 9^ E C N v c E_. Y mr a Aie d d k q n C >� du~ M •dEi L 3=. u Vu ,� L aW 0 6C 4Q WS C M EL C4 n n ^u NC Q� N x N C • ^^ H i Qom/ O 2 O dool U O �' o .o• •Te .�v ••y � uT ML � d� oa u. 2.. N.tl N O y V o u m W d NL UY cq Ld DpV01 E p dd LC u U T « L W D �• _ 6 E L d d O« C d OAT ¢ 6d d- • c G.Z� � Lq. L. N • p Cq iq�y dEu TT c pY uy ..d Oq c o �I tiI NI �I OI. NI bl. ^I � �� NI nfl VI o p 1 � 1 1011-1 d D v N G 0q0 L. SNOT N ' y ^ NqN ^N qq y COfWx �L O p•W y �6 a E ~ h ` •Or. O'.t 2.` u u adia Ty. '°c N c.,ouL D. y =y t Z. d d V G 6 y F �9 pcp d. uL y� a+ c E d C u• a =c u E v ODo d= d0 2•+ A p.+ U c0 c > C G p\ C p• d EO L F 1.1 N O c t 01Y� aD d� L LM o A c� aY .... Y w La E � � c d^c ••ir i� dq Od O� q aCCCCa�� dd TV L . �-9-. c Q Lp N. 4N J2L O L�.•.2� 1�«. L«. 6= N' 1•1 < Uf lD O'1 q n�i i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA wcA,tiso STAFF REPORT `�� Aft i 4 C o y a F $ Z U > 19i? DATE: January 8, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: John R. Meyer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT': TIME EXTENSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12577 PILGR_! - A custom lot residential subdivision of 16 lots .,„n 4.24 acres of land in the Low District (2-4 du/ac), located on the south side of 19th Street, west of Hellman Avenue - APN 202-041-03 and 52 I. BACKGROUND: Pilgrims Enterprises Incorporated, owners o: Tentative. t, Tract 12577, are requesting a one year time extenuion for the above described tract. Tract '2577 was originally approved January 25, 4984, and set to expire January 25, 1986. The tract was approved as a custom lot subdivision wherein individual lots could be sold for development. II. ANALYST3: Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension with the development criteria outlinea Wit, the City's Development Code. Bused upon this review, the project meets basic development ` standards for the Low Residential District. ! III. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends -a twelve month extension to January 15, 1987. Respectfully suLmitted, i Brad Buller City Planner BB'JR3:das Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A1l - Location Map Exhibit "B" Tract Map - Original Resolution of Approval with Conditions Time Extension Resolution s_ c! tr ITEM B Pilgrims Enterprises 13150 Seventh Street Chino, GA 91710 November 25, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 Baseline Road Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Brad Bueller Dear Mr. Bueller: We are i.oreby requesting an extension of Tentative Tract #12577, located on the south side of 19th Street between Hellman and Beryl, due to delays in processing of the map., If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 628-7196. AOL Sincerely, s; Joel C. C000er JCC/psu �- a W TRACT 12577 SITE UTILIZATION MAP ' \1�Lr1 m4r - GMDEN '�1taEEf '•' t� � r; r •''•' Cl Cl [_1 N �1W FI W MEE 1'y YM ..l \ M 41 1•l 41 ta�tl ; . IC TN �� STpEEr •� IY1W.Y41 .• • WI/1 s.14•fll� 0 �; �� � r; i 7 I, p M. • 1 NORTH CITY OF ITEni:7MZSZZ RANMO C1CAMONGA TITLE: .BMW :M2- PLANII M-DIVIEM EXHIBIT. °A" SCALE. -"` i I � � o TENTATIVE TRACT 12577 �� � err--�,4��`� _���� ,.1 • _• _ � ' >�•�_= I r= INETE TH -- - �— � •� _ ..STREET u<rr-y Vic-• •3.�. . i 1 LI t fi w'1 f •. � •_ \'a�j; Sao'�I � �i, 1 _.�`„�-•... .. ;�� ,t I InV l t1 1 NORTH CITY OF ITEM:7TT17-577 RANCHO CUCA MONGA TITLE:sc2tr-'91"A41110d/ZC 7 7 PLANNING'DMSION EXHIBIT: ►��" SCALE- z RESOLUTIO3 NO. 84-11 A RESOLUTIOK OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12577 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12577, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Pilgrims Enterprises, Incorporated, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, Stat3 of California, described as a custom lot subdivision on 4.24 acres of land in the "L"`Dist,( t, located on the south side of 19th Street, west )f Hellman Avenue - APN 202-041-03 and'52 into 16 hots, regularly came before Planning Commission for public hearing and action on 25th day of January, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has re•,J and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12577 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the 3eneral Plan and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative 'tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. v Resolution No. 84-I r Page 2 (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12577, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division 1. Variable front yard setbacks, per the "L" District standards of the Development Code, shad be recorded on the Final Tract Map. 2. A minimum depth of 100 feet shall be provided on Lot 8 in accordance with Development Code requirements. Engineering Division 3. The Final Tract Map shall be revised to provide a 60-foot right-of-way for the interior street.' 4. The developer shall be responsible for the installation of a catch basin on 19th Street and outlet storm drain devise to the proposed Beryl/Hellman sturin drain. The required easements wili be the t-esponsibility of the developer to obtain from the adjoining property owner. 5. The developer will be responsible to bond for the installation of adequate flood protection devices from the Beryl/Hellman storm drain channe3, if the City ch•;nnel project has not been awarded fo- construction by the City Council prior to recordation. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25th DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLAN G MM'iSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. /lt/N.t© Dennis L._Stout,,Ch61rinan ATTEST: Ric Gomez, Deputy Secretary jr I! f Resolution No. 84� Page 3 .4; I, Rick Gomez Deputy Secretary of the Planning '.ummiss,on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing %solution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the ¢, City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held := on the 25th day of January, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ, REMPEL, STOUT E r NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: NONE j 0 i r :. � f� qi 'p `N O C. •'O..SU. `.Li�D a�C '� A.c �y 1}VIA_ U� .E a 2' •'�T �a d o N w.p �t� �y C N s '" stir Lr �a c ce nr 4� o� O•C 4 =TU d. G T q' 4 Nu �'^ 9 4^ .�d. N.yJ. V a�7C ^d� .b^•7. 'Oyi qC OYi u^C C:. yl� qu Ou dY0 a N.d.+.d oIIa R•L. N« A OyiCw ^A'. Uu�b .•c. >d L dOlq d=Y y 0. V9HC dS4 Msu aNM C.C� >�G N4LC E dU W^ �.r.� .♦A.YL6 2 NO NC.di d A.0 Ol'Nd O:Y OCLY d Q L C 0 6 d C O g N w A «,•E..j d 6.q tYdt- d O V S w L� 9.G naY b♦G 9 La rO+ CN A Ad • d'r: ^yC p NC N C pi — pd aN vt L> U' qw E N N d u M .+ i q N�� 9 A� «v d � L>•• q 6> d N A 0.N g d C p q j•O `Y�i C L. p a G d 0.. AY ar L.�N NO EECN =C� u_dD..p Cwq � G • CON p b9 Mww C u-0^ ra0 Tadt'iu »C�>q�qtt AL cBNy 6.T•4N 4x adll w N d B 4f B. O r n 'r pp N 4LOtl dOdd N bd C • L.=' L CaO p-c> GC LL L`yy QL E yN.L. Nq Oa^ 5.' A 4 ynC gE y«a C F VO • c Y♦r pdU do y L Oa A ~y^ FF YGL P9 U �� dC•a• t0� = L^d C^� L AN p pp Ci Tug 6N�oV 40V0 6V.d0 '<gyL4 G04y <N4L 64♦r� Ka FqN .l`..Nn lwu♦� N _ « d. W IO OL 6d q S a0 dt y4 �a; EE a 6 «b0 OTd « L O ♦ 4A« L O h « c E S nSL Md 4c �9« N j �C.g AKa cN cEw w� dGp fir d tiNN ys^y. �4 L« ��♦... a^w 6 p 0 w N Y 4 Y A j. �. 4«� d' Vj2 6y= CO dY dolt E 4^ at Na q C y 4 if cow U f. �� U U'nE iG LW ao. 6a3 4. � dYL oqG dy 00 C N.N�. ru 'c dd ayu 40 3 »N N CSOA tJ 4Gy� u4d H6 L.p t� C � sQe. j -. W � � d ntii ..1 •H N 1.1 `=. Y1 nyl N pFU N c ar. u�c Obp c oo ,u ya.>',� �N d 9r9 deb C N O E � LAP L. Z � b A Y.LV LN eHN iOY��- RO > 2r Oqe Alr r E.d C A.Edy Ldy�Yd� _ ^ E YN eii. p='° `jYW A .1-i d w. an cuL„a em�g�u.�.p Aq U ^y y d eog� Ta�+O'O o aLrrim uunun6 r�u oy >.e •� $ i.. uL Yb ce c H9hji .cam. nL qoM BYO ca i c o g _ �E Nc.cuo a 'ticc. ` 2. a0U.0CaAUC^rOpry� �qd q.4i Gd ^`A00 yC��- � O.c WC=N�Vn. O LmaiiuC Y+.� Lq wO nu y u V E B V uT. Y m o` a cy dyT y�`.ram AL L. B M1 �,A uT Na .^.r E L O •� E HFL O AO N> Ya r ^ c NT. d=GL �VLa E� AC OnY. T no.N pptyY^90 Lyy p.GLq q J] Y N d O C Lt O N u^ S L d ^q L EC6q A u.L.. Ta OOY�O H�. 0�4 �Or G��^ rL Y. OFb \9¢ A� q n �}1.O nY'L OY dw. N �C, �N ��. dY Su�O ayi q'��a. + Oua,. -OtO q CCO r•dur. >.d�O. y. CO^. Qi ce 69._c Lpry •.� d u d .,p.. ..mac u a off. L acy c -ruq r LL R O.9 V. W L. 9 3 J H 9 O lx!^y i=N 46�6 1�L OrIL nn Lp.0 O.N `N 90.QTa'C LY api L- L�i.nAY.L..� C'•VNCgzML..N •C. r En M� a vw o N a�'vi �^ A aQ .ya o9 . Yd�rN apyp ^ c c v ca r L >C D.. nTz b Hy 2. u A ma9^ icE. yL aL..K. pd09 CCEY SL V. ab d d Cb Orb ��c tl } • C,E bv4Ro .�.J+ Ab^^y oW0 t: �u.Vin 6 Al y O d do !�dC0 eoA O^ab NCq L d R b �Z u- N.E vr.- V 9u2V r a b.0 WdTi •LY^ LS.o�b� 1�W� uy _ � dm cc - .a d u a• �o o u� q`o$ aNF, L+9^ p oNb qN au. cy A� yG •- pao UL SVA vuG a�yCV� 2 S E LY C vrp C4 L CL o� N C oqa _T 2 01pCC O d q N� d yq.= pE ? as Lr -�E yu I. A 6Ol OqL dam. L. L n �O d L` 65 a bJ �.6F }6t'q O� .a Y.pd eOq 2a2 a ,qU ^9 C`y.�U A O O O V` d - Oda 6a OJ Y., � d O L Y M^ �V'ld q�:Orp M`a,.LMCN Q 4�6U � P G YsSIV C AAO.J 6. R� ..�.•.` .a VO LO aov�o > � � � aN. y •" n L p v� xe .a�'o aaip •pp••N+ n '� rp 4.u0 t G.y p4Y� o 41 4. a uC '0a n� ua�5r L R. e y _J6Cy. H CC yVAaJ AOG YL N^N ��Ya� J q N. qG y69 } rN Y`ti.� y.LO .per. N.Y1 y 99 o Q L N -� $ra`o g' c avm Hoe Joao e� �L. v\a y C tt u A L.N Ur0 N 99 CO�';i N QyV &n9 pNy N EL Np. d Qa'' �^ •'3�. as C..u A a a6r� rFJ �yI L'V a O. V9 J .00 `.UJa .Ui G^ pO�rG.3 063aN OC yC Y: 1=-.a S r N O Y.J N N q S N O J L H T !'•G•.N 4Y 6 C O V O {y M Ae y� o c:aA Dora co ouwLL W E A O C G 55 O" Z... op Y N <y C D y_^N � CCLiNU IM N p v �ua� aye u+M tom` " G.J G L.r in a M N a ,eo^a 4L d aea •+U y w b>iZ q'a'C NC y ^ Of+ �u^pL S.VL V .C. N A co. ' =Ogg H 6 A Y. 6a LApU� I�.t^ p Nqp A Gad s: ¢,G c.o: a'g ae ycn wt�`^��- u\ •• 4 C A LL.Ja lgjc nor `o u, . L w a Go a\wv r F^eo sa. .J pC T_ N` Y N.A d`O o aN✓= 4�� G.4 y.Cc U , � O.G O U V Q.p.N Ap Scc Y • �� O aG kk CL.d ? C Y` rt Cy VYC ^y M f L4 U. Qp C\C Ov�i p xn a Q H V Lu Vt. C L �L. qq < <d a+Q O N.`^..n C <wa.r W.YN062 N�NAN <.UO «3HU? i T U a d L a a d. �.C. 6+- �C E tL Q Ep.,� u o o m e L n d u .- +'H y `•� n��u y� T cu•- T=.L O' N� L� � aoo. Z `.z.c o'rS .cam _ o. �`_ �D '" au i 4J ����q roT� oy} �q q q a = p9� � =--•tea -°•� � "d CL S. d E my. �.� '� ^ A S •A •o U on �N ac - s✓` wC a a •oa yq - n to a >.,Eon UtJ.n TN CS _ `� EG �� dy. T dC pu DOE C d✓� 'a d.N �ro d VY NQ dt�( _1 is ^w 6U 0✓^ G. sd dd � dC.. `V n. CprG ii'ci cs• � aL.-po. r e `uc n —� a oae ET •L pY ?n •uyp' ac �^ EO per. yrE aOWO Na Ud d C� w0 ✓^ y�Si. lff0 ld"r l4r U .•. LN uu E.e u dG CY 'c O n _ u �'� oU t�.O L^ •'-��✓aip =�n�ro ad. o°� '✓^T— Nnei ._�"..,_N ooy rn_ — a'd.rn a�.gw.o N � n... •-c.E na gym. q...w:;word ar�L �F�=a N 6UA WNO WY1.;) �6 CLjj!126� ¢d� CUY.n N � _ ^J Y .I ✓ ✓ ✓C C ✓ d_a d— _ ro ^O d • L9 +sU 6✓ .O EG T.� Cdu ✓6 c ✓per ✓CO ^ . Qa a d Y✓r^ d Ecu IC Y^-d0 E p=E ad N d u y •• —.0 L d C a ? - E e y ECTu N N L VFF ... nEpo G .^� O • C.0 O� N N9 A n O 06d q6U n9 00 Cp W i. a LO.wL. dV Ea= d dq El ^N aNv S �u N uE v Y aTeroi� =p'.n U d GI ✓ w ✓ � c L �Cr L � q0 L Lo'Edd Cn ✓pU d.. • C^U �W.a E ^u y N Td 30 O a tad Loy`.' f.d _ • CNro 9C Yl dp�C L 06C i'4c a W T yL p L SO Oa €G.0 � p O TLL TOo CpTY C Cy2i. g YY UNO CL9L u O 6 r�J W IaO., W..H.2 d d✓Y r q It' 4✓ L I ( I. I d'Cr.�. Id•t.1 a C v d In r IS M UW a4 GN. y �.N "• O py a i ... � N T• T4 9 n.�= V L z o E b N N.N Oi i •:': t N W.N I. •'y d i 9a v G m e d o E C q9 JIC d Iads �A 2yr. C� - N^t 4j w GEOyO afgy O .Ge C t` �d GY :: o¢ Ns. a inN to• vt N U d S D O J F v d a m ¢u•"G.. c.•e 4 v� .u2 i Lot.Ga G'r¢ En c� l I. ; 4 L 1Oi�• W � Y ti 9 A N 4 eyoq a.tbA aw ra • Otr a' T C Gt, ntNi l9 A da�i0. en � � G o E n ? u r,p Ny a O�gcdiQ G O e a C N d of O T,•0,�. Y i r y rn 2 u y L S TT C G� F`1 • 0. C d� � ALO NOiuO •`H Y Wb pt G,G t^v� t '•�. � `� Cy1 L�C O>D P9 C NqV 6 Lp u T t G � 0u C • bCN 4a �E y •� rGE E J O c ��.nOa why uM G.EiG d '° FUr r.p �7�`� �L G.'•C• a En E •a �'..p y o Ip IL /V ti T tyj O t o 221 P O}L 9 C l t✓G C :. +I�,• t., - _ N O O. 9 0 C �LL• Y t d G O L yI N� ` 'a nXEu tLuaa' a`o$uoo.n o y'1 a va i• e� Y tp . C O d 4 V 61 11�1 Gi m:O Ct Lam. 1 L� 8 L N GI r�L 11If �1 b LV N ad •a N O ^ IN 60 Ce m ^O ��. = u v Au u]- Yi at da C� � S^N E O G ONL G USII' �. 6'P EUl L� 9r COA N NU d0 +"1 L ••.rai A ` O b C .�L. LU Y<O UG d L NL +CA ZZ aYa and no � PLC Y� a� =d9 _� 6Cc A Qdti GW tiC Y O p Or N O A V d� Or , O� X Yyr LL q« pl G n L € dd C y: N V, 4Y d�.^ . 2 d A •y-• d_ bp0a t r,N 111'•. - � I Y Asp f•� a- a Na ,. d u c{ d ht Aft ooL` Y L � u oa�� .d• .x.. aria a. co As H o 3 x o r4u ^d=az N ."'• •^ay `o cow^� r d O t�,O' In AOu M O.q C. p 4Ua=iN O N L Cal. a N� Q. 2t,n N SUd x N LOL ibv6� P+- fLir O T A S T G Or O d�p � N 4 c� U N LY? XL CI rW N U E N A u L. 6.i0i N •Oa Gf N y V y PW 4..0 c<i•- Of 6. cEai N •'1� a Y qd N d g U u E aE= ^c � muc qu�v X.y Eyq dy `Pi 9 ^ ofN x H a`N A �� ar vi ... ua�u.G. ^._ PAq O.d C LU d uY T T u c ; �u � b i Ab rtNci Au urp L � Eu .' iY L q 6 EN OEM. p^. n!O Ga•. E L C n dY Y O n E N b N E o bE L CO a 6CLi� � <� s,o d x A E = e.L. r — ,LI.oc 'o n e n v; cu a^ a E L O O . C q N r F 3 a N 0 d P' n A Y� 4 C .7..W N O Y T C <y Z J bd•_ o L=w uy n>A .N+un •" oN� rd'w YE t]U4bW aL LN J.0 1a � R L LYE •C u E 4 N_i N D to T 6 Y N K uo N u i,:. d u rYIN L L V T C C!9 B-13 N RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12577 WHEI 0;, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above-descriWd project, pursuant to Section 17.02.100 B WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-described Tract. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for development of the project, B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expir.tions a, ld nor be consistent with the intent of tbc. Development Coue. D. That the granting of said t;me extension will rot be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or Improvements i in thn viciW ty, ! SECTION Pe The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Pro ect Applicant Expiration TT 12577 Pilgrim Ent. ianuary 25, 1987 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8Th DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Etout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary , J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION January 8, 1986 TT 12577 Pilgrims Page 2 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and reguiarly introduced, pr,ssed, and adopted by the Planning Commissior, or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of January, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONEHS: NOES: COEMIISSICKERS: ABSENT: COMMIMONERS: j : I • I i 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA o CUCnA4' STAFF REPORT Tw F � Z U( a DATE: l January 8 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 85-0 - THE WILL IAM LYO CO[dPriNY-- A request to amend t e anned Comn;un ty text or t e ictoria Planned Community to allow commercial recreational vehicle storage and mini-warehouse in the (Medium-High) Residential District. Related File: CUP 85-26 I. ABSTRACT: This proposal is a request Go amend that portion of the Community Plan text for the Victoria Planned Community that prohibits recreational vehicle storage in the Medium High or High land use categories, and further requires that any recreational vehicle storage allowed be private. The applicant is requesting approval to develop a commercial recreational vehicle storage lot with ,mini-warehouse, in the Medium-High land use category on the north side of Base Line, east of Edison utility corridor. II. BACKGROUND: The Victoria Planned Community requires that recreational vehicle storage be provided within each residential land use category of Low, Low-Medium, and Medium, for 25% of the lots or units contained within those lots within the Victoria Planned Community. Further,_ said-RV strage is to be provided either on the site of each development, or within the boundaries of the Victoria Planned Community, as a private recreational vehicle storage lot. The William Lyon Company is proposing this development (CUP 85-26), to fili this requirement of the Victoria Planned Community. III. ANALYSIS• The Victoria Planned Community encompasses approximately ,t770 acres, and is planned for an. ultimate buildout of ov::r 8,000 home.;, Since its adoption in 101, 2,239 dwelling units have so far either been developed, appro,ed, or planned within Victoria (see Exhibit "A"). This equates to a requirement of 560 recreational vehicle spaces. AQ ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REFORT VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY Ai:'NOMENT 85-01 January 8, 1986 Page 2 Oak The Community Plan_ allows the f?exi.ility cf providing the RV spaces either on an individual lei basis, or as a recreational storage,•lot. The ability to have an RV storage lot within the boundries of Victoria is because of the fact that the Community Plan permits smaller sizai_lots for single family homes, and these lots would not be large enough to accommodate on-site storage of recreational vehicles. However, with the development of an RV storage facility, the Community Plan requires that this facility: i. Be a private facility for the exclusive use of Victoria residents. b. Not be located within the Medium-High (MH) or High (H) land use designations (see Exhibit 118"). The William Lyon Company is proposing the development of a 263 space RV storage lot. Also included is the provision of nearly 33,000 square feet of mini-warehouse storage space, as well as a dwelling unit for a resident caretaker. This RV storage lot would satisfy the need -for the 225 RV spaces (see Exhibit "A"). However, for the William Lyon Company to develop the facility 41; proposed would require an amendment to the Community Plan. The Co��nunity Plan specifies that any RV storage lot within Victoria be 3 private facility for the exclusive use of Victoria residents. �Ne Lyon Company's proposal is for a commercial, business-for-profit venture open to the general public. The rationale for this approach is the belief that the facility would be better maintained and provide better service for both the residents of Victoria and of the entirs City if operated as a commercial venture rather than by a homecwner's group, the lively operators of a private lot. In regard to the current restriction of a RV storage lot in either the "MH" or 'W" land-use districts, Staff does not believe this to be the most efficient approach. Instead of regulating the location of RV storage determined by zoning, Staff believes a more viable approa.,ri is to regulate based upon conformance to performance standards. That is to say, it rakes more sense to determine an appropriate '.ovation for such a facility based upon such parameters as site location, access, eompatihility'to surrounding land uses, ` quality of design, etc., rather than as to the zoning of the site. 't A.other issue raised as a result of this proposal is the appropriatc.aess of a mini-warehuuse storagz facility. The Community Plan makes no Peference to mini-w ehousing as a permitted use. in argument can be made that mini-warehousing, :.s*, enclosed storage space of personal items, is a related and act' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 85-01 January 8, 1986 Page 3 complimentary use to RV storage. It is just as viable an assumption that people wt:o live in the Victoria Corimsunity will require enclosed storage space for their personal belongings as well as requiring storage space for their recreational vehicles. IV. FACTS FOR FINDING: In order to consider approval of this request, the Planning Commission must find that this amendment is consistent with Victoria Planned Community and the General Plan. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public. hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider all material and input regarding this project..- If the Commission concurs with the Facts for Findings, adoption of he attached Resolution and issuance of Negative Declaration woult be in order. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:BC:cv i Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Victoria Recreational Vehicle Analysis Exhibit "B" - Resolution 81-37 Conditions Numbers 5 and 6 - General VICTORIA RV ANALYSIS TRACT NO. LAND USE # OF UNITS # OF RV SPACES REQUIRED 11934 Low Medium 123 31 * 12044 Low Medium 101 25 Low 76 19 * 12045 Low Medium 271 68 12046 tow 174 44 12832 Low Medium 135 34 12833 Low Medium 117 29 * 13022 Low Medium 94 24 Medium 181 45 * 13027 Low 157 39 * 133052 Low Medium 226 56 1305' Low Medium 142 36 13058 Medium 202 50 * 13059 Low Medium 154 38 * 13060 Low 86 22 TOTAL 2239 560 *Tracts on which recreational vehicles storage spaces are provided on individual lots. Number of RV spaces required: 560 Number of RV spaces provided: 335 225 RV spaces needed Notes: 1. Tracts 11934, 12832, 12833, 13022 (Medium L-U only), 13057 and 13058 have no designated RV storage spaces. 2. The total 'RV storage space of these tracts 5s 225 spaces. 3. The proposed RV storage lot f;.s 263 spaces. 4. Built tracts: 11934, 12044, 12045 (partial), 12046 (partial). 5. Tracts under constructicn: 12045, 12046, 12833 6. Approved tracts: _12832, 13022, 13027, 13052 7. Submitted tracts: 13057, 13058, 13059, 13060 3 �.� Resolution No. 81-37 Page 2 3. The Planned Community text shall be revised to incorporate all conditions of approval where appropriate and to pro-vide Tom, signs in organization of the text from page 171 to the end of the text to the satisaction of the City inner. 4. Definitions shall be added or deleted to the appendix A to coincide kith the additions and/or deletions that have occurred as a result of the revisions in the regulations, i section to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5. Recreation vehicle storage shall be provided within each residential land use category of low, low-medium, medium, for 251 of the lots or units contained within those units within the Victoria Planned Community. RV storage shall be provided on the site of each develop;nenr or within the boundaries of the Planned Community as a private recreatio;i AM vehicle storage lot. The percent shall be revised on an annual basis and may be modified by the Planning Commission. 6. Recreation vehicle storage shall not be permitted in the medium-;:igh or high land use category and shall be restricted by CC&Rs., subject to review and approval of the City Attorney, 7. Affordable housing shall be provided in accordance with the revised regulations text, page 225. 8. All tentative tracts• shall be reviewed by the Design Review Committee prior to consideration by the Planning. Commission and shall comply with Ordinance 86 - Growth Management. 9. Forty-five days after City Council consideration for approval of the Victoria Planned Community, a revised text incorporating all of the changes and organizational changes necessary shall be submitted tted to 'ne City Planner for review and comment prior to a final draft text being reprinted for redistribution to the City Council, the City Clerk, the Planning Commission and Staff. a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 85-01, . TO MODIFY THE . COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT TO ALLOW A RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE LOT WITH MINI-WAR€HOUSE °S A PERMITTED USE IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH (MH) LAND USE CATEGORY, AND TO ALLOW ITS OPERATION ON A COMMERCIAL, FOR RENT BASIS OPEN 1'0 THE GENERAL PUBLILC. WHEREAS, on the 8th de of January, 1986, the Planning Commission field a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and i WHEREAS, the proposed amendment wil: provide fur recreational vehicle storage lot in fulfillment of the requirements of the Victoria Planned Community. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the foIlasing findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not have sinificant impact on the environment nnr the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan and the Victoria. Planned Community. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a signif;cant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration ,- January 8, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the Califor;r.ia Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 8th day of January, 1986, Victoria Planned Community Amendment 85-01. AMk ce.� PLANNING COWI SSION RESOLUTION VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENWENT 85-01 January 8, 1986 Page 2 1 i F 2, lhe• Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approved and adopt Victoria Planned Community Amendment 85-01 to modify the Community Plan Text as follows: (a) Condition #5 of "General" of Resolution No. 81-37 to read as follows: "Pecreational Vehicle storage shall be provided within each residential land use category of Low, Low-Medium, and Medium for 25% of the lots or units contained within those lots within the Victoria Planned Community. RV storage stall be provided within the boundaries of the Victoria Planned Community. The percent of recreational vehicle storage spaces shall be revised on an annual basis and may be modified by the Planning Commission." (b) Condition #6 of "General" of Resolution No. 81-37 to read as follows: dML "Recreational Vehicle Storage" shall not be permitted in the Medium-High or High land use category unless within a designated RV storage lot, and shall be restricted by CC & R's %ibject to the review and approval of the Cit; Attorney. Recreational vehicle storage lots may be permitted within the boundaries of the Victoria Planned Community subject to the granting of a Conditional - Use hermit by the Planning Commission. Prior to approving a CUP for a RV storage lot, the Planning Commission shall make the following findings: (1) That the size end configuration of the proposed RV storage lot is adequate for the planned development. (2) That the location of the proposed facility is adjacent to a primary circulation route to permit reasonable access to the facility without resulting in negative impacts for surrounding properties. (3) That the proposed RV storage lot is compatible with existing surrounding uses, or with those further uses permitted in the land- use designations. (4) That tl,e, proposed RV storage lot would not be ' detrimental to and result in s:;gnificant negative impacts for surrounding properties, property x owner,.and/cr residerts. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 85-01 January 8, 1986 Page 3 (5) Th,t the total number of RV spaces provided, whether as spaces on an i•.Jividual i,%t basis or within a RV storage lot, does not exceed more than 25% of the total number of duelling units in the Low, Low-Medium, & Medium land use categories. Mini-warehousing may be permitted when -n conjoinction with an RV storage lot deeloped in conformance to the above referenced require,., nts. (1) 4 mini-warehouse shall be defined as a structure or group of structures providing enclosed and locked compartments for the dead' storage or customer goods and wares where ind'v1 dual lockers or stalls are rented out to diffqrent tenants for storage. As with the primary PV s`,oraoe lot, a mini-warehouse facility shall be designed to primarily cater to the needs of the residents of f the Victoria Planned Community. !2) RV storage lots when developed with ar^essory mini-warehouse shall conform to the following development standards: (a) The minimum area of a lot for a mini- warehouse facility shall be 2 acres. (b) The maximum building height shall lie 2 stories or 25 ft., except that any building or portion of a building within 25 ft. of the front or strzet side setback shad have a maximum heigtt of 1 story or 10 ft. (c) Only one point of ?-tgress and egress shall be allowed', unless another is required by the Fire Department. All driveway., shall be radius type, and shall ;have an unobstructed length of 40 ft. from the curb to prevent vehicles aad trailers from interfering with traffic flow in the;street. (d) Two (2) covered parking spaces shall be provided adjacent to the manager's residentt/office. In addition, one (1) parking space for every 10,000 sq. ft. of • gross floor area, or a minimum of three (3) parking spaces for facilities of less than 30,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area, shall be located adjacent to the office for the use of prespective clients. Required parking shall not be rented or used for vehicular storage. - �t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUMITY AMENDMENT 85-01 January O, 1986 Page A (e) Buildng materials anf treatment shall complement those existing ^ -Lnte surrounding area. (f) Outdoor storage area shall be permanently screened so as not to be visible from the public right-of-way-or from adjacent Tots. (g) All utilities shall be underground. No water, gas or ele=_tric service shall be provided to the individual units. (h) On-site, 24-hour management shall; be provided. (i) The Planning Commissiott sh0l establish hours of operation as a condition of approval for any conditional use permit grantEJ for a RV storage/mini Warehouse facility. f' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS STH W-2 OF JANUARY, 1986. r PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO £UCA=IONGA BY: *Dennis. L. ;;tout; G aTi%rms:i ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify t; : the foregoing Resolution was du y and regularly introduced, passed, afe! zicpted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regutt:i• taepting of the Pla :tiro Commission held on the 8th clay of January, 1986, by the fnit u.:inc vote-to-wit; AYES: CONIYSSIONEZS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: µ' 0 9 e. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ;cnnro STAFF REPORT 1 O o E_ Z v a DATE: January 8, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the ^lanning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-26 THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - The development of the commercial recreational ve_icle storage with mini- warehouse on 4.4 acres us 'land in the Victoria Planned Community (Medium-High) Residential, 14-24 du/ac), located on the north side of Base dine ;oad, east of the Southern California Edison Utility Corridor APN: 227-091-42. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, •_levatlons, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Suroundinq Land Use and Zoning: North - Southern Pacific Railroad; single-family residential, Low-Medium within the Victoria Planned Community (4-8 du/ac) South - Vacant, Industrial planned; Heublein out-parcel wi+hin the Victoria Planned Community East - Vacant, abandoned vineyards; Medium-High Residential within the Victoria Planned Community (14-24 du/ac) West - Southern California Edison Utility =-ridor C. General Plat Designations: ' 'Project Site - Medium-High Residential (14-24 du/ac) North - Railroad Right-o -Way; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) ` South High Residential (24-30 du/ac) East Medium-High Residential (14-24 du/ac) West - Utility Corridor f, � P ,p t ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 85-26 January 8,; 1986 Page 2 D. Site-Characteristics: An 180 foot by 1,031 foot parcel, on the north side of Base Line Road, bounded by the west by th; Southern California Edison Utility Corridor, and to the east by vacant land designated for Medium-High (14-24 du/ac) residential development (not controlled by the William Lyon Co.). The site slopes to the south at approximately a 3% grade. Eucalyptus windrows are present along the northern and southern site perimeters and a number of existing trees are scattered throughout the project site. II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The proposed facility includes 263 recreational Vehicle 'parking spaces,, seven guest parking spaces, 32,893 square fee* of mini-warehouse storage space, and 2,100 square feet of office and caretaker's residence. Additional facilities include a recreational vehicle wash and dump station near the project entrance. Ar-Aitecture along the Base Line frontage is reminisent of a Victorian "railroad depot" design, combining stucco with wood-type siding. Roofing ma*cerial is proposed as asphalt shingle. r A number of trees are present on the project site, including Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees along both the northern and southern perimeters of the project site. The trees at the northern perimeter are adjacent to the railroad right-of-way. For past projects, the Commission has required that the Blue Gums adjacent to the railroad be removed and replaced by the Spotted Gum (E. maculatta), per the windrow replacement standards as specified in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Blue Gum trees along the southern perimeter are at '.he Base Line frontage, and should be replaced t;ith street trees per Victoria Landscape Standards. In regard to the trees in the site interior, again sufficient information is not available at this time as to their numbers, species, size jr precise location. However, at the Design Review meeting, the Committee did offer the �l direction that in relation to landscaping of the project site, the primary consideration should be landscaping and design of the project perimeter to soften the visual impacts from off- site views into the site, and not internal landscaping of the facility. B. Design Review Committee: The' Design Review Committee approved the project subject tc, the following recommendations: 1. The circulation system should be modified to allow • functional use of the pull tk-ough spaces where a vehicle can access a space without having to back-up. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF" REPORT Conditional Use Permit 85n•26 January 8, 1986 Page 3 2. Potable water should be provided. 3. All roofing mater;iai should be tile. 4. In relation to landscaping of the project site, the primary consideration should be the landscaping and design of the project perimeter to soften the visual impacts from. off-site views into the site and not internal landscaping of the facility. 5. Provide treatments to perimeter walls to softer; their visual impacts by such means as using alternating materials, creating shadow lines, vine planting, pocket insets of landscaping, etc. 6. Wall heights should be increased from 6 to 8 feet for means of additional screening and security. These comments have been included int- the Conditions of Approval. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project and determined that with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with the applicable standards and conditions. D. Utility Undergrounding: Overhead utilities exist along the Base Line Road frontage of the proposed project. The project has a relatively narrow frontage (178 feet ±). To underground the total project frontage would require extending to the nearest utility poles. To do this would require undergrounding of 400 feet, a distance which is more than double the project frontage. The existing pole line is considerably south of its ultimate alignment; therefore, angle poles may be required at an additional expense. Based on the above, staff recommends that the developer not be required to underground the existing utilities at this time, but rather be required to pay an in- lieu fee as a contributor to a future undergrounding project for a longer reach along Base Line. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of th3 Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. A copy of Part Ii of the Environmental Checklist is attached for your review and consideration. A number of existing mature trees are'present f on the project site. As a means of implementing City policy of tree preservation, a master Man of trees and tree removal' permit shall be required prior to the issuance of building -permits. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 85-26 January 8, 1986 Page 4 IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Victoria Planned Comunity as amended, within Victory Planned Community Amendment (VPC) 85-01 and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In 'addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Community, the Development Code and City Standards. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider all material input regarding this project. If the Commission concurs with *he Facts for Findings, and Conditions of Approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration wou'd be in order. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:BC:cv Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Land Use Map Exhibit "B" -Location Map Exhibit "C" - Detailed 'S 'e Plan Exhibit "D" - Preliminary Landscaping Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations Initial Study Part II Resolution of Appc,J al with Conditions _- -a S:o.r:rt zezcT.c Ilk- _��� Y.re•wYr rr..r:...w_ _ —`er.....:.�.' ,L .+r:�iuu - MH MHt"• i L Zj; 1 ziscwr EI1NE ROAD � cerTcn �M. L. ` of ..�•���eeeeo.:.� V * F i f RR aeo ,n.uwr Q��..�w®���F�si►Nwe� � .. �• $ "F°pen 4- •��.imc.E3 t�,. L RR H = H M VI#ORIA L*E5 B 1 fro vzaYr �.� ! "•ttt. i e I .-•�it.frrr.. Ct.^"��/'�i.�►`mil ..-....'.«.`o_'+y .-:' "'r"` • E DR il.' � �»~~: � # ��' �s Tre i[w rusw •;,t� . ,'RR ` RR RR H p RR a cnnucuz. C :te7. j Lrosr oEn.cc d3SIS MILLER_AVENUE r .—T.®�.s.v.��e�� eve �=�•iay. '. �.'. l; ` • r f o; � VE RRg RR b r —� o•; sA� C E { 1 REGpjSAL CENTER'+ it VICTORIA LAKES W RR LAND USE LEGEND RESIDENTIAL ../ i Q L0w 1•.OW. I' - RR' ICw•rEpryY «.au. i' r RR c t, �Y' Q YcauY •N ow. a•.p ° � 'yam,_� _ YeOiuY•Y0Y wn MI. FSSD7NI`t,l,., aOULEYAAO._. ',�;, � — -• 0 PGY so-so oW ■t COMMERCIAL -- jj{(■■i T• •.�� p n64bM.L CENTM ' 1 f nefJ°�K neuTFO osI1CFTCDYYFnOuc , •`I �;. ( ��' �� �Y.Y[tF COYr�nClal C[PTEP t' • Q•�F•• OTHER USES RR 5� 4rvF'VSFS�YOdLF14T Mn.M L t�O Q TEUN.T cmc uazs.nurow,drtsuno, J,..�� O Crn•CMd • f COMMUNITY PLAN "ictoria A Planned Community II f in Rancho Cucamonga HIGHWAT •• the SWa group r •� land planners Y ��I v! U 1� EMOM YiiM 3N1. 53A1I1 3R1 wait: /.aK��I t •I. �� .r 1 gdd- � 7 --S � + 9 CD r S f it I z Mp 5 w a ® �• �.. z LLI V p MLU z IL LU IL 'a ¢. co IIII z Q = S I! o _j J CL N L) m w zi w o LLJ �- a � U - � Fra. �....c - x�a�i ast�s. soais�a�u a �b _ �'•e Z;R ��Ss'• ar �.?�rs� � i z a t .J I -•o�s�w..ry �.� ;'.�:'•" �oaN•mw:Jv �... 2s�r� "�. nau aosrs •oeuus� s�1��9��� :e f 1-1 - J n gn a o txaHdva nttT ..: � �vaef� uvts vieotan 'anoa��wt�iunia�asao�a� ' - Ntna•39dNiH13T• ,• t —'8 EMOVED Jvn.Ld30NO0-•- Ml __...,fir is�. �`` T t...a•�.,....�. _•_ '�\L�I I.- rl Of I Mv _ �:Sul 9i� A•�• � —� �V•..,!.. :I � FeeBBa II1 �1 L —.........1—•• SIS [ m s — it VuH �Q� [[�-.HRHlaQC •. � -• •� d,yr - 1�;���� �< K � • � .. ��'-''_ _Ili l a .�r �RSS�6� .0 as _� ;��ua�yo¢a:SB�i�eSE€!iaa--. -- K �. -� ,... :.• F s/'� ). ;� ice. ff� [ wig e.e wil •` a fig. €!Fa i >•..• �.� -�� � i ' woo iQ Sit 'I! O[c�s.�62C pcSG:[83R6�o.6.� y ta7a, avoa�rval/ -. 71s1nvi' 1 — . - ��_ •�iw�.45'S�{io"..Tom. S ?GMI t•�yyy Q y� A •w� tiFaC Y1i1S ,� C yrySS ilk � 4 y:�k? i • CITY OF RANCHO C'JCA?10NGA PART II INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: APPLICANT:_ FILING DATE: Z (QpjS LOG NUMBER:�u P ,9 ,. ?/_ PROJECT• Q �l�-6 vK •�ez[,00ca�,.tT e�x QVStnQ.erm PROJECT LOCATION: JJS l.lnl� v<o E �.isY Ecv�t U rcat- I. EW- IROMfENTAL IMPACTS C�P�.tOoyt. (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and GeoloQv. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions,, displacements, compact::Wn or burial. of the soil? c. ;Cange in topography or ground surface ^ contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and/or ijlk use of any mineral resource? 2. Hydrolocy, Will the proposal have significant results in: Page YES MAYBE 8o a. Changes in currents,, or the course of directionAft Of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage or the rate and ;.mount of surface wateratterns, runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood Waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of Kater? e. Discharge into surface Waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? 9. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either thrr-.igh direct additions or vith- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- i wise available for public water supplies? I. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? _ 3. Air Quality, Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constnnt or periodic air emissions from robile C±- _,,direct sources? S.ationary sources? ac b. Deterioration of ambient air,quality and/or i interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic r conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, d;C—ribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of an,Y uni ue �r endangered species of plants: 9 rare Page 3 YES `LaYBE NO C. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? ' d. eduction in tkts "otential for agricultural production? Fauna.. Will the proposal•have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of specias, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Ponu` Iat�s in ipn. Will the proposal.have significant result • a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or creas a demand for additional housing? 6. .SOciO-Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional socio-economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed. w among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Plannine Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or • p"armed land use of sn area? y b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulait y or quantity of existing consumptive or non-consumptive' recreational opportunities? .Page 4 'YES MAYBE NO ` 8- Tran�nortatian, Will the proposal have significant results in- a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? C. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present Patterns of circula•- ��- _;zL tion or movement of people and/or goods? _ f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water-borne, rail, mass transit or, air traffic? 9. Increases in traffic hazards to iaotor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?' 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and/or historical resources?' 10. Health. Safety and Nuisance Factors. Will the T proposal have significant results in: a. Cra-ation of any health hazard or potential health. hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ �. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? ` e. Increase in existing noise levels? e f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors? h:' An increase in light or glare? 1 • Page 5 YES KkYcE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: f a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? Z� b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utili:•ies and Public Services. Will the proposal have - significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric po,;er? b. Natural or packaged gas? � .Z c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? AMk f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? i. Police protection? J. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including 44 roads and flood control facilities? Ir m. Other governmental services? 13. Enerev and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal e have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? C. An increase in the demand for de,>elopment of new sources of energy? 4 d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non-renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? Page 6 YES MAYBE NO e- Substantial depletion.of any nonrenecable scarce natural resource? or - 14. Mandatory Findin s of 53Qaif ance. a. Does the Project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife_population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of ,long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively left considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the i_.:cremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with: the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). d. Does the pro,_ 'gave environmental ef%=rts which will c ',ubstantial adverse effects on human bei%, her directly or indirectly? U. DISCUSSION nr EN�'IR03MEdTAt EVAIVATIOY the above questions plus a discussion of`preposedf.mitig ticnemeasures),, ,i Page 7 . " III. DETERMINATION AWL On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COLLD NOT have a significant effect 2 on the er*Iirz--=ent. and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have n significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigatioL measures described on an attached shay,:. ';ave been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATI.; r , BE PREPARED'. T find the proposed project IiM have a significant effect on the envirnment, and an Z,\VIRON:LFNT Y:IPACT REPORT is requ' d. Date ,mature It le i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-26 FOR A RV STORAGE LOT WITH MINI-WAREHOUSE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASELINE, EAST OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON UTILITY CORRIDOR IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH_RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 DU/AC) WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY. WHEREAS, on the 28th day of August, 1985, a complete application was filed by William Lyon Co. for review of tho above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of January, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the ,proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Victoria Planned Community, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions f applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the illl public health, safety, or welfare, or materially r injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Community. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on January 8, 1986. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 85-26 is approved subject to the following conditions: Planning 1. The approval of this permit is granted subject to the approval and adoption of Victoria Planned Community Amendment (VPC) 85 O1 by the City Council. With adoption of VPC 85-01, this project shall conform to all of its requirements for a RV storage lot. Page 2 2. The mini-warehouse portion of this facility shall operate only dim per the >arameters of the. definition of a mini-warehouse as specified, in the Victorja.Community Plan. 3. The parking spaces within the storage lot shall only be used for the storage of recreational vehicles and for no other purposes. 4. Covered enclosed parking shall be provided for the caretaker's unit. 5. A master plan of trees shall be provided and a Tree w,u_ Permit granted for any trees to be removed prior to the issuance of permits. The existing Blue Gum Eucalyptus shall be removed along the project's northern perimeter and shall be replaced by the Eucalyptus Maculata, minimum 15-gallon size, planted at 8 feet on center. 6. The final design of the Base Line parkway shall be consistent with the approved standard for Base Line Road. This design shall be included in the landscape and irrigation plans submitted for the review and approval of the Planning Division prior to the issuance of permits. 7. The circulation system shall be modified to allow functional use of pull-through spaces inhere a vehicle can access a space without having to back up. Alk 8. Potable water shall be provided. 9. All roofing material is to be tile to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 10. The on-site landscaping should be designed wi h emphasis to screen and soften visual impacts from off-site views. 11. Treatments shall be provided to perimeter walls to soften their visual impacts by such means as using alternating materials, creating shadow lines, vine plantings on wall, etc. to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 12. Masonry walls are to be provided along all property perimeters. Wall heights shall be increased from 6 to 8 feet for means of ad;i tional screening and security. The wall along Base Line shall be staggered to increase variety and visual interest. Engineering 1. The developer's engineer shall provide a vertical alignment design for Base Line Road from Day Creek Boulevard to Victoria Park Lane to be approved by the -City Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or bu=lding permit, The construction of portions of the street improvements may ;,ave to be deferred until a longer reach of roadway can be constructed, therefore, '1 and in lieu, cash payment to the City will be required for deferred improvements. Page 3 2. The method of draining the site shall be compltible with the design of Base Line Road as approved by the riity Engineer. If drainage is to be directed to the soutn as proposed, an easement from Base Line Read to the retention basin to the i-outh will be required py.or to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 3. A detailed flood report for the project shall be prepared by the developers Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. The report shall contain detailed information such as calculations, sections, etc., to justify the proposed designs. 'In particular an indepth analysis of the methGd of protecting the site from flows through the railroad culvert directly to the north of the project (240 cfs shown on the preliminary report) shall be provided. 4. Prior to the issuance of a bu'lding permit, the developer shall pay an in-lieu fte for one halt the cost of undergrounding the existing overhead utilities fronting the site on Base Line Poad. The fee shad be held for contribution to the future undergrounding of the utilities within the project area. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS STH DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Ruller, Deputy Secretary I. Brad Buller, Deputy 'Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamorga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Rese'ution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Lcmmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a. -regular meeting of the Planning -,M- mission held • on the 8th day of January, 1936, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES; COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: ' COMMir"' .±NERS: � w � f - � rz u ^ ve oa qa v -vo IR O FErN 6C.N L6 '° .O.R EE .Y VO Oa n nu0y dL L 6L E o.- ti. na,dn c'v.d o d o N A von nq L.n Ly d.E14 o , . qoo € A O E AD •cOj•. � "d^01 Y€C d�°� c C d 6 L O d c n a EE Z d E Nn v —I {.• M E w d 2 9>. o Y O n y,w^c E L O. ' 1..1 9 dA �� do 9p dqC EOH.0 .Or x C.Y.,O, O dyu Z. > d i �c2a adid� O N 9.cL E qY0 aL�. E,e drr=... n. Y 2 .^•. >Y O O.y N y L N N d.N Z O p r� L E A E a e E co d a1 y L O.E E d c> N q.A A"p. A c d0 L- rT ^n pp TE ON AQ d9 O i°Cy idin a^ O c d > n E r Ep a v E u m y u V q T n O O,•+n v r c! Y n0 ....L d� cn nA> Ad E O C y o u L O a O E E EE NO L MCy O }O 6LOCOU L E6^'c N C �d E d y O p O A c CO 2 2 +6 c Out .0 LN VO> rC E i 1 WN �pp K. O� 6 Yq.d92u0i L.AS OOaN CU— CN-w 2 ¢Oqm FG 6L.-n Y yi �I m o0 11 OOq vs's EY E tL FFE T G�•SiA Er' 2 O O 1� CCCffff w c N % c u c 0 O N c J y O n P O c N O E.G cr W 0 — try F p u L ==y r O L A 6 E t y iW.xt n c C y H €y p F= x na d a e Ndc c` A o n N c e • .mod tpf -Cu E N n ry d Y Y. J O^Y L O Lc do n VIN N Sd 2. O 6 A FA pti2NH NLM� t-2 W ww. N N nw•� J � N HItg Q y t_ 4 u !• , Tdnd v Eur dC W a i0 N O N a p d ub a U tea' n �0. O AOp VLO VLO E. .9 dY c0 nJ ny .. `Rl M q C 9' ^E Lpa vn q y EOd vN d •� d 0 U C N NGL =E i L A.' L�O.. Od^O 6uli >•ya �^ L N3.SC ua 4J gLO V L 'O C01 , � Ldi EE � uE� +• C; T6q C^. w E 9. aO••..W�E i p AE AUN C 6i.i ^O T Na o v ,',•u m c� i E n V a G `•p qu O L U E. O nm LC C q^ � �Aym Lp qpd O .-. aAity. O V q d p E A E A ^ o T�N dp,pd du ;�.py0 Yy vy �N N yf d Lq 30'A� ;a AT d a '. no�`q p .dc a A'ad•Tipao p^ •. cep, pu�j�� y Ed L Ty 3 d q�6 rd� a E Cdx C y qE d A E' Y aq� Q.E d66 ¢NapiW� N.L••N NL=I.N In. QCY.y.pp Nd.G m U 0 c CG �:6 �v1rC • dCiN 3,V,q U Yr. `U�� a d^ T O n•. `N p N a O�a�irL Ta U Sv 10 pA v3 �.q C ;pC�� Qi0 i d d U S^ ` A. N Ay vLi dA i• N n O.O. 3 ,9 C � Z O V t w uC N A E , VY p d O C Cp oU as A C dQ tl L dN N O 6 .dam O EO YQ N v E M c d A 2 Y A d L n i u A Q:A y Nd H' • j~ Ln �0.6 �i �Y L? d Y=, I LT�wpi ¢N...aay > r a q 9 C a G y W 3 �.N n n` ^ U pnE O La Y 0• p AT. ti Cb q6R •p^�Y L^ 9ap-zOC LC O 6� E F L O q d E Y a -10 c'v _ io y,�i o. ;;� per- � ea•=�ni a qc,a d..+ ua' �, C A dN u V •Jn>dC yli L 9OQ O.p. Nb NrLi c� A EgdC J A N L 9 A U W—g C y N uc .-.ud ur CE n ^ o a z i..z t u '^ u o N u Ca. E C.O YL YY. C • p U L d v Cy..3 nL E=L N; o T�L.•.Wy No Co �"_.N. w p E d9 9v Ga G O �0 Gy d^ Y C9 C C O V O\u y dyEE L v .d. Ed p a E dtiv �9 •- OLL CpL Ud > +- u O y N d L Y n �9 Y d. -2 E.p Qo6.dC.n NO I�L uiCA 6�Na NNA d JY 6 Y V 6 N n«p1.5+ d O O O C� ycl- 9dN C n`o tea^ _CYd 1 W N Y+ r d p p aV ♦+ �� v a`. m v E v+ W C q O d O Y A y ep o N 9tA Q. ti. [y p C A.0 • > S d '• q d� sz= u ALN z `O n NG a _ c �Y dyo N U d o ♦". `a-N N a c N d It Z c c ce t1 v c dVC d6upi grt�L Qq Q1t- st �M. qd GMtO. AO dd� dy dL A L IW L. Oaq 6 O a.CA t Yd..0 d awi d V ill. Y.p C y. q �9 Li 9 n a 111 n+ L q E. O.n Ldq ow •.. d dd. •— L n� p V E Ern u..p i• q!• L nyayt. c T a ly+ E «dy a C —O n CA 1 M 1 d0 vC t cq i^.c rna a.0 ad a G 6 •p� ^o' np �. Y A♦Le� tit C O.0 �_ � — q.� C>^ �M9 6N q ♦ N"' C L o. A•�q n�0. • N.•pi ♦q-p EM Na u p O O. Y. y=.N yy ^p pe• LO^ uw N y d F qu q do ;tz V ++... a u++. TY 9 PSG dr u • a ^. q q l+ p N N g G a V N O e� d ov w $a i.i•a 'E> y2q2 M p♦u �'V N nQy �Oo. S C 01 4 E •" G Y N p E ^ N� qL O. rr c Y;q O `y n= p% -• d 9 r A w p cY aN vp n o N T� Y Eud AyZZ p•.d� O� N .-.t^L LOq cL EC y.•b.q u Cd 6 .p-d Aida a.A 6�Cj q c y N ^ Y +c «c ^ dpc i+c HKAO u a« c>n' wo ♦o^u AW Y N u� qLN> V 60. gEdi O.p^9y O. O p G y u q �_.+c 01 79 E d • p ^ .2= NV A a dp� j • Oq c�q p LO N 2 O VO d (-( Cu+. nLCAsk _ E i` Y E 9 K> ny 'd+ d �e L L ♦On 4 €L d K MO .q+rm � 4v N: F•nudi 6U 49 l�Oh�q Qpp 6w6A n.6ri N.�v.y 1V _ `ra m oa �c d Ya e E. b tr i ti o �E s V.i r<.• � - yqE N S d c>� b y O C W �?o S» '•y C b N A9O Ap O.O y.� W b°yV OW ~dN � •V^ V6 W Orin • tNEE H ^Y Y' Od .. tT 1. Q O,O V q q L..G.� L H NEq t. q pN m VL 3 O o 3 o w _ +^. •O N UE 6 yam^ n L CO u d p E ht:E' C m 6a`-5 Eq .G:.rV dOC aitCVO 9t.L J «N O,"E„ 6 q®6 <Iu 9 d T 06 O 4u.-. .yam QO qp6 G. Ld ' wR L. Wy~ YV W C �N � O TKO Att Y'..G iO W qAA O.4�E pcb= y _^ Ann— 14r..0.Y y�•L w W O A O b y'�y t4} 66 N O �p N j �d N <^ Y V T i• b i L w t.^s a T En.s E „•b c.d ` E V Oz J ^ Y b E C N V O T A ^C i '• ... ` C 1 E d d v G u 0 d T A 9 6 r AVA 1�4w 31.LLN 6. H I.dWi O.j 42 WIN k.5 N Od^ m x t ym Oa v ate. •N,>i-a. b.YaOi ad • L� ��.5. u pR0 2 3.2 Np L y A E �� W� C OA uCl i d« m jo EY QN� y LL A my>.b wA O b b E x io o. G.L, y b NAq o» u Ti i++m qw C p >_.` �� :u m •, Nun_ u oL ai `- L.d r,... E Vy S ^4 c w E~ Oi ti 9 �Yd NA aOa �� 9C NOG r LT F 9 �pL Vy �}y 6O L� ^ A �di C G A ri d6 i. Oy GE ,d0 NN i :9 .N. G^ byiL OLdC O. Orn i qdb� C YY �E� OHO<� wb V OI GK E A.G. �y m=i•'r cd o• bG N m i Y N.C 0 N w c V 6 L 4 4 L a qa d u o •... 2�A C EO..- »O6 �A� »i AN L 4.0 WAw M VO LL ^. dC G.E O.. ON4= u d b L o A V: u E d W L^ O d ..- C �' L NN d LPL O.C.% M M w N N .n 2��.- y L E.•.- q N� 4 0.aD C r u WILL >w E S Z-Iu '1 /V'� � -Iy-•71I� N � 4 �Q y`ao v e crn�L � w l� p�c M n� r +• v o;p >C~ba SE.d l u Md V E Ldl� O N ^ N 41 r i0m yw. T u rnb no = T aV Q O V u2� Coo. COS o E�aTr a Z p.T byro ^SN a n N ^oM u AaE r t o': L Vo n 1r. Up O n .0 EN: � dyuL ai. A O O C dd Or Lr. COEIC E w y L ^ M EGL qb 620 cE q w N = LO y�tp mw.y • < d. N T C d N C b T j u � A d Cub T E W E A b4 L. L. E 0�.Y W O n ..�a� d.Y,o. dv t n Sr s w O C v{ de d p.• W O C T loc ae n n. Y ou L u c S LL aY 60 YO qU y > Tjy q2 Oa C ^ COY wAO b w > OO+C-W O.r rN COi.O 4C Y6LW d A � N a — z w � 1 1 ad _ a oc sou � d Lq , `q q9 y�E y O �' C�ai. yW� OYU Oar YaA" Ln u y � • y rw. m 3 Z.E >.CW L Nu. dE. �E c. t 0C rL O duV ' Y _L rr Sb c u�L W6 dam. q Gp pdgn Vr 5.=. Vur b.L d db. vaa cC p4'•. V MN �C S 4Aj W CE CT '6n N. dw08. vepa wp-aw A:qq 'd0• q V d w C dr..C. SL d0 d0 Cd C y qt cb as rw O wq `O Ay .ou dqr ♦i �.q E u ro aA,,.d 'b2 p L Qi N c ¢o.. o L'pc^ $c rn pNjd M9 pNj6 yA C. �= Y Lp OW .—.. O bV _uE L� l�bC apNp � d"E" � �. qb b • ww.u�q �.�q - L. O 6u A N C W Er ^ LIdP W LI d ' CdOVL G C CL a uc LY:c L o ar,. ,^_.Y " p Cygd LBE u "' nyv O by A NL C ea I oNC -y'Nj T C'p'Ap COA v cya' U aA. Gb. Q` O tp d�br 2 p�jb NW CE 7 O ~� OiV O N Od OaL pay. O� q d Y A +lCb. • O Y H .` O 4C V d..E 2VN nG.d > Np>>a. QAOL E NC'vd daq � N q L q NY9H—. QA9O 06w ESL W ND W VU �6 �a a2 Kw 40 Q.O1Y r0 6 q f.1 y � • • N 1'1 q' N. b �-ems' i. �,ua�T o 000 oL oo .tb. a ooa.au w ;� y \\ a L` L>. o f N•T OA N n a M Npp G U U a GdY to Y.A Cd 2 L A_ V .Y � d L N -. y,G G d �•. 3 C Z >• L.aN C >• WPLS `." dEe y b� NQ'7� }l 2 L de Ey an w� U iu•d- '° y N� n m •r� prn�A pow c o[ co cu die OC.W pp` _O.il. dQE6. N.2 00 •.V-� Y� U •- q� O�qy • d9. E LD .•.y E E GV S. L LOG 6 a ti.i � € ^ 7 y A yt N ad a me yvo apv �EGY Y_�u'-• a a$ 4 • C A y N �V w�• O Y S=2 O 6 O W sl nx a E E2.�.G.U+ aV EUy Q+ CL �I�d O Cd y"16y� �C d O U p IIa a Wm�� �a'dG^ >'•' y Y y V a s _ Y ONO Y^ 2 L OLG A U NU•"'O •iE. VtH Ay NA y OI m=^O ai n6 W G aaW TL B G c T u.N NY y a4 YN o: � N�c r•• u U Y �� N �_� >M Oy d v� Y N 6W GT..•. Q6N� NOSY. N9 6V..0 4t} 6•�. NL LU S.p i0i9 6 •r A.W M a2T� aN s A`Y. y � L �'� Y y pd C a L tr _ az Y•.a p OL Or i CGp 2 p�j � L. y u L NA y o i Lo A aca 19 v P. O Y N ♦ • T •C O � N. -Q-: o « R u Y =q 0_ �' s= oa - v NYc � E= yw a Aad. b O.A Qpl W2 UAAN� 6L. {.tom W �V Y E dw•,,,�. �a a2 u r � � q •Gap V y 9'=. o. p •• Lc Nfi E N N � to 00 `YuE � d C.2Y. 41� VY O OU `6 a G d 6 V d u yy •GG^ ..d..Cd �Y♦ G OIL 41 . N1 L « EE L QJ a9 .n u «.a LwN C. �oG'�, Mou of a . N w u at V L^ ¢E 2 44] y2 F.L C Y adC C� Gm dY n. ^N d nia 2s ai. y N g E hS G.V y `•,Y G N .c.aEy ^q a` W.c. C L a ^ G ^L c ,c J T-9 G o2 u d CXg 0! > > Y > u E ` u q �«'I' �• NI ^I 0 Im a u Mu yA g u 4 a o qeN v�.` ao y 2�aoa N N L KA oa a o9 o a LY u q0 " U A N a C sc1.E ad L y i.. 2oq ..q.c 1a oa Ea W .nGLa' G N V. a` •• V� E b. � II. 2r da u a q V Cq. uo i . < C q ANC cN^ aC �..q n.G c G^ • V pq p0 uV nO GeO.. D•+O OW aW. Vy a dL ddd 000 a' ai:... ;e d.0 v vu - a: d u NI e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1*0CA410! STAFF REPORT O O Z U > 1977 DATE: January 8, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Varren, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-41 - WEDBLAD To request authorization to operate a travel agency in a tenant space within Havea Plaza, in Subarea 6 of the Industrial Specific Plan I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested': Approval of a Conditional. Use Permit Application and issuance of a Negative Declaration B. Location: 9140 Haven Avenue, #109 0. Parcel Size: 2.01 acres D. Surrounding,Land Use and Zoning: North Rail Served IndustriallI.S.P. Subarea 6 South - Vacant/I.S.P. Subarea 6 East - Vanantll.S.P. Subarea 6 West - Truck Distribution/I.S.P. Subarea 6 E. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East Industrial Park West - Industrial Park F. Site Characteristics: The tenant space is located within the Haven Plaza located on a 2.01 acro parcel of a planned 4 acre OfficelLigtit Industrial Park. Present development includes over 57,000 square feet of building door area. I ITEM E P_•ANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT January 8, 1980 CUP 85-41 - Wedblad Page 2 II. ANALYSIS• A. Background: The Haven Plaza was developed pursuant to conditions .:' the approval of Development Review 84-21. Since the construction of the development, the following actions have been taken by the Planning Commission: Conditional Use Permit 85-27 was approved authorizing the operation of the executive health center (18,240 square feet) within one of the two-story buildings of the complex.. 2. Conditional Use Permit 85-30, a request to locate a beauty salon, was denied by the Planning Commission as a result of the potential parking impact on the center. B. Discussion: The applicants are proposing to occupy hal_ of the front portion of Building 1B. The travel agency is being established to meet the travel booking needs of the corporate and industrial businesses located in the Haven Avenue Industrial Area. The business, Plaza Travel, will conduct business Monday through Friday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. and approximately four hours on Saturday. The office in to be staffed by two full time employees. C. issues: The application has been filed pursuant to use provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea b), which requires Conditional Use Permit approval for the establishment of personal service businesses. With the hours of operation set at 9:00 c..m. to 5:30 p.m. and only two tull time employees, I staff believ-es this business will operate very similar to a professional office use. Further, staff would anticipate only four spaces would- be required for the subject use based upon the use of 1,084 square fee% of floor area in a parking demand ratio of one space for each 250 square feet of floor area. The original development approval provided, for over 2500 square feet of office floor area in. Building 1B. The travel agency is to locate in one of the office spaces fronting on Haven Avenue which is consistent with the use intensity ,as originally planned for this building and the complex. Presently, the units fronting on Haven an Buildings 1A and 1B are occupied .by an insurance agency and a sandwich shop. D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has determined that this project should not create significant adverse environmental impacts. if the Planning Commission concurs with these f findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be If appropriate. F':Z PLANNING -+ISSION STAFF REPORT January 8, 1986 CUP 85-41 Wedblad Page 3 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Staff can recommend that the following findings can be made for this project: 1. . That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located as evidenced by ,the. Conditional Use Permit provision for personal services in the district. 2. That the proposed use, together with the-Conditions applicable_ thereby, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as evidenced by the similar nature of a, travel agency to apprcwed office uses. 3• That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable previsions of the Development Code. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing' in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site, V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all material and input regarding this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the Facts foil Finding and Conditions of Approval, adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Brad Bu ller City Planner BB:AW•das Attachments: Letter from Applic nt Exhibit "A" Location Map 'sxnibit "B" - Site Plan Initial Study Part II y ' Resolution C/hJP ��t� —RECEIVED-- LLOYD AND VERONICA WEDBLAD CI`i OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PIANNING DIVISION dba PLAZA TRAVEL 1215 CAMUS COURT DEC 101985 UPLAND, CA. 91786 AM pM DECEMBER 6, 1985 71b j9jlQ jUjlZjlj2j3 i4 j5j6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONSP DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY'tjEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION 9320 SASE LINE ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 li THE PURPOSE OF THIS LETTER IS TO APPLY FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PE RMIT FOR PLAZA TRAVEL TO DO BUSINESS AT 9140 HAVEN AVENUE SUITE L09} (IN THE HAI EJ PLAZA COMPLEX) LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. PLAZA TRAVEL IS BEING ESTABLISHED TO MEET THE TRAVL- NEEDS OF CORPORATE AND INDUSTRIAL BUSINESSES LOCATING IN THE HAVEN AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR. AFTER BEING INVOLVED WITH THE TRAVEL INDUSTRY FOR NEARLY TEN (10) YEARS, WE NOTED A MAJOR DIFFERENCE IN THE NEEDS OF THE COMMERCIAL TRAVELER AS COMPARED TO THE VACATION TRAVELER. WE CONDUCTED A DETAILED AREA STUDY WHICH IN TURN INDICATED A NEED FOR,THIS TYPE OF SPECIAL SERVICE MMH CLOSER TO HAVEN AVENUE INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR THAN NOW BEING PROVIDED AND BASED ON THIS, WE CHOSE TO LOCATE FLAZA TRAVEL IN THE HAVEN PLAZA COMPLEX. PLAZA TRAVEL MILL BE CONDUCTING BUSINESS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY BETWEEN THE HOURS OF-9:00am TO 5:30pm AND APPROXIMATELY 4 HOURS ON SATURDAY DEPENDING ON OUR CUSTOMER NEEDS AND WILL BE STAFFED BY TWO FULL TIME EMPLOYEES. I HOPE THIS LETTER OF PROPOSED USE SUFFICIANTLY NSWERS ALL YOUR CONCERNS BUT SHOULD THERE BE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE FEEL FRET TO CONTACTED US AT OUR HOME PHONE (714) 985-9913. LL:OYD WEDBLAD VERONICA WEDBLAD t I l r : F y , CIRCULATION K a 120 R.a.W. . ARROW-0 ao 0.0®.o 0 o 100'R.Q.W. s -., ) 88'or less R.Q.W. {RAIL SERVICE SERVICE o ,w : , -h-f+++ Existing ��,• � ®Z is:b Gu Proposed e O i `'siibaroa 9 y TRAILS/ROUTES 0000 Pedestrian ° ®sw® ` T Bicycle Ar SFa sFna. Jj CMG Regional Multi-Use ain 9 Special Streetscape/ Landscaping A a x o Power Line/ im Utility Easement o ®•••® Creeks &.Channels subarea s Bridge } Access Points o o a o A6tB subarea T7 Park Fire s Fire Station 5 zr d ma •swt lz ,} O ar ? anAnw 4 .. A d A °O° 0 iD-0 A Qth; GO 400'800 1600 •ems ^1..eS rR `ybwl r ti.. - ,�;�„xr:�;M=.^-.i'a::. •>•. .* l W Q Gxesm.»..u.._s• 'd' NORTH CITY OF t 'CiI�® Cj.TMO1�r�iA 1TEtb[:4CyV1)l7'1 tdl TITLE:__jk0: PLANNING DIWSION EXHIBIT: " "O' — --SCALE: s . d r.t W S _L N � � N i � • NORTH CITY OF ITE-kl: 02Lc 1/,&L I<_ AOL RANCHO CLTCAMO\TGA T1TLir: PL,ANNIl\'G DIVEIGN EXHI[3IT- ��� SCALE-� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: /Z—'la-9,5 APPLICANT: LLOy� /IEpa� l�J�I�l�iidn FILING DATE: /Z-/d—BS LOG NUMBER: CUP PROJECT:?8QU("ST AU�i(af2iZf17'�nl Tr3yylBUS� ist T .4t L�UEdJ�Y you_ T.ir£ s,P. OV--A G. PROJECT LOCATIONi��¢B I. ENVIRO\^IENTAL I*fi'ACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO Alk1. Soils and GeoloQv, Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions,. displacements, compaction or, burial of the soil? c. ,Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any Potential increase in wind or water erosion szon of soils, affectingeither on or off onditons. site c � . f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or propeity to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or*similar hazards? h• An increase in the rate of extraction and/or use of any mineral resource? Z. Hydroloev, Will the proposal have significant results in: y p HY 'Page a YES AYBE io Ask a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? - b• Changes in,absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? v c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? L� d• Change in the amount of surface water in an, body of water? v e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? 9. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, eith^r through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? d h. The reduction in the amount of Water other- wise available for public water supplies? _ v i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air_Qua� lty. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? C. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? v 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results inAlk a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, 'rare or endangered species of plants? -8 _ i* Pace 3 YES `LaYBE No Amik c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area?. d. Reduction in the potential. for agricultural production? F_uaa. Will the proposa'L'have: significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? of c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? V d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? ✓ 5. PODUlation. Will the proposal.have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? v b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio-Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional socio-economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed - among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have ignificant results in? r a. A substantial alteration of the present or plan-ad land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non-consumptive recreational opportunities? y, ^q page.4 YES :!dY3E NO re 8- TraysDortation. Will °the proposal nave sinifisults n• g cant a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for.new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present or movement ofpeopletand/oof goods? circula- tionf• Alterations to or effects on present and potential water-borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? 8 Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?' 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: qW a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and/or historical resources? (� 10. Health, Safetv, and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to P pote.:.ial health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an acciderc? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? r e. Increase in existing noise levels? ✓ f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous. noise levels? 8• The creation of objectionable odors? h:` An increase in light or glare? Page 5 AIL YES aal'vE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obztruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? b. The creation ofan aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? / 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need far new systems, or alterations to the following; a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? r c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? v i. Police protection? ,, J. Schools? k• Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public ^'.„^;.lities, including roads and flood control facilities? M. Other governmental services? 13. Enerev and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal h.ve significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? vI b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing , sources of energy? C. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? ' d,• An increase or perpetuation of t;: , consumption of non-renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? Page. YES `:AYBE NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? _ 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare ori endangereyd plant or animal or eliminate important exampler of the major periods of California History or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 short-term, to the disadvantage of long-;.em, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable futute projects). d. Does the �• I project have environmental. effects ,V which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or Indirectly? _ c II. DISCUSS20N OF MUR03i`LNTAL EVALUATIM (i.e., of a<firmative the answers to- ,above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). y r Page 7 III. DETER*i_NATION On the basis of this initial evaluation; 11-71 'I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environments and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will .be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a rigni£icant effect on the environment% there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measuras described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE MCLARATIon WILL BE PREPARL:d. (--^� I find the proposed project 4aY have a significait ffect on the j�� envirnmeat, and an E;NIRO';%MNT MPACT REPORT is required. Dat Sigaature AUAI M4-04 ) Title .J `I I I F RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-41 FOR PLAZA TRAVEL LOCATE; AT 9140 HAVEN IN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 26th day of December, 1985, a complete application was filed by Lloyd and Veronica W.edblad on behalf of Plaza Travel for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of January, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the a>>ove-described project. N:W, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the prcposcd use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives oZ the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3• That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on January 8, 1986. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 85-41 is approved subject to the following condition: 1. That the travel agency shall conduct business operations from 9:00 am to 5:30 pm Monday through Friday and four hours on Saturdays. i r' ►. �fy PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION' January 8, 1986 CUP 85-41 - Wedblad Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. P7.ANUING COMMISSION OF THE .ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: .Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by `ha Planning Commission of the R^ity of Ranch; Cucamonga, a' a regular meeting of t-he PiZnning Commission held on the 8th day of January, 1986, by the fol -owing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: c x- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G4iCAN STAFF REPOEET • O O U `? 1977 i DATE: January 8, 1986 TO:: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris West;nan, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONM'AThL ASSESSMENT AND CONDIT1077, USE PERMIT 85-38 VICTOpY CHAPEL - Non-construction Conditional Use Permit -to establish a church in an existing building in a multi-tenant industrial park within Subarea 4 f9eneral Industrial) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the northwest corner of Archibald and 7th (9618 7th Street) - APN 209-171-47 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a non-construction Conditional Use Perr B. Parcel Size: 1.48 C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Subarea 4, Industrial Park South Existing Residential East - Subarea 4, Industrial Pa-k West - Subarea 4, Industrial Park D. General Plan Desi,3nations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South General Industrial' a East - General Industrial West General Industrial E. Site characteristics: The proposed use is 20cated within an r existing multi-tenant industrial center. ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSI0N STAFF REPOPT January 8, 1986 CUP 8�-38 - Victory Chapel Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. Genera:! The proposed use is to be located at 9r,18 71.h Street (see Exhibit "B"). The major issue related to institutional uses located within industrial areas is compatibility with surrounding tenants in terms of parking ave,.ilability. The major parking area for this unit is in front along 7th Strset A parking count determined 36e overall parking spaces avail,lole within the Inland Center. Based on a 2,402 square foot 2anctuary, 69 parking,spaces are needed to fulfill parking requirements for the proposed church. Within a two hundred foot radius of the proposed church, there are approximately 155 parking spaces available. Fourteen of those spaces will be used by uan Bernardino County Public Social Services for fleet parking at present during evening and weekend hours. The County has plans to expand their staff and fleet i» the near future but has not determined whether they will remain at Inland Center or move. In either case, there is ampl..t parking available during non-business hours. B. -Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee found the application to be in conformance with the regulations and standards governing Subarea 4. Foothill Fire District determined the project to be workable pending several corrections. Those include fire proofing, installation of panic hardware and exit signs as well as approval of all interior alterations and sprinkler alterations by the Fire District. C. Environmental Assessment: The proposed project has been determined to be a categorical exemption (California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Section 153C'1, Class 1), in which it will not have a significant effect on the environment which shall, therefore, be exempt from the provisions of CEQA. III. FPCTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed project is consistent with uw, Industrial Specific Plan. The' proposed use, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, will not bb detrimental to the public health or 'materially .L.Ijurious to properties in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT January 8, 1986 CUP 85-38 Victory Chapel Page 3 AM V. RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission can support tae Facts for Findings, then approval of Conditional Use Permit 85-38 through adoption of the attached Resolution w th Conditions would be appropriate. RespectDilly s111^9 itted 4. Brad Buller City Plar_ner BB:CW:das Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Parking Enplanation from Applicant Resolution of Approval with Conditions r- i AT&SF R.R. „ - 8th ti:- z3MmA;t Yam ** subarea= - - "'vigil • .. �g- h t x x. �sp t '. u t gp r x �c&SIb4.9a � ". r t ^F r (D =mot rr, 5 Q ...........�f' subarea tS >9 o I Z,^ a a 4th I<�_v NORTH C°TY OF ITEi%,I: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: %riur-iJTY A1AP PLANNING, T)IVISIoN VICVOKY UWrILl- RNVACHO CVCIWAW\ GA C91, q/?,Yo f-Y)rlAt' iILEX Gtl/G�O.tJ c' `�92Z0�► ��NO. SFRCES lPEFE�S 7b NUMAeJe of PRRK/NG SPAces c y At O 4 Le,. 1; ' c . W o n ti -a3w 7bQ 11vb2VA u .. ? a dwoJ�"C v► d yy 09 PAM uvi 7 o f vow �I a L yscnolpy k Z �►si�vacb If r uovns.o,-� tl n%taglij ® r II y N V _, d N •� � S � ij 011, s,--a=nI i novas hi—r t--s®as•eta savvas zs —rorws si—.1� 1 5T. EXIST/,,VG, 1-1OvS/AIG �i?90M 779E vP f •� NORTH CITY OF ITENI: RANCHO CLTCAMo-i\,GA TITLE: PL AMINrx DIVISION EXHIBIT: tom`_scn[.E T5 VIC'TO/tY CNAPEL 9GIS IT14 5T RANC140 CLvchmet46A CA, ct rno PASTOR ALCK WILSOAt 899 7-20 2. 1 CLA55 P2AYt2 1 r i �t Icy (vya� (tOO.M 2-5 yleS' � 1 1 A 1 t t 1 1 I i 1 CLASS j I SANCTumv? ki 3243d ' CLASS o ' S O x 1 PLNUORM p - •r.. frran�n�f � . tY i � rNIJi2SEKT i,"'a+v�rvaevvnrypv i or CITY OF, ITEM- AMh RANCHO CLCAMO>TGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT.� SCALE:_S�. v 17, ` CG t,J& VACA alb? od 00,1A-,U-VoauG. a0l&/4. Vl7"r/ oot;oVOao, u 0Cne--,9N7'' GaJ�O G/5�s Ct=4444V7- 4,�177VOV 04OW ="UaF=, Aoec- 1ot1669' 6' �f T Q,tJ ,�r✓/��� y�L'!re CWGLJs Pi 30law ��!r/• �/l ��i eV17- 7D A:::) z P:gPw:m5 G s s2:, of l" 7-1414. Ova? P. 67' ZzAj A-Aa �/UTl, f� i5z 6'y .ST P.� T/i�1�'< (,GCBs ovi:-.�� .�.�,�' �t� ,••��- ,^ (/e, J� E541J, 4CIV 5 R E�L I V @ / CITY OF RANCHO CLICAMONGA PLANNING DWISMM NOV 2 71985 7t8t9t10i11�1xt1�2t3s�t5t6� F- 7 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-38 FOR A CHURCH LOCATED AT 9618 7TH STREET It. THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, on the 6th day of December, 1985, a complete application was filed by Alex ifilson (Pastor) for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of January; 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public 'hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFOV• , the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is inaccord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies witl each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project has been determined a categorical exemption by California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 85-38 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. This approval shall run with the applicant and shall become void upon a change of ownership, or the use Ni�,4,rrrrrceast *-Modification to the church operation or ii rAnurre a modification to this Conditional Use Permit. 2. The site shall be developed in accordance with the approved plans on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, ,and Industrial Area Specific Kan regulations. Prior to any use of the �-a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION January 8, 1986 CUP 85-38 - Victory Chapel Page 2 Ask project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner and Building Official. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and all other applicable City Ordinances, in effect at-the time of occupancy. 4. Any signs proposed for this Conditional Use Pnrmit shall be designed in conformance with the ComprehensivE; Sign ordinance and shall require review and approval by the ?larning Division prior to Installation of such signs. 5. If the operation of this church causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses 41 operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the. Planning Commission for their consideration and possible revocation of such use. 6. Public assembly or large group meetings (50+ persons), shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshall's Regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for capliance prior to occupancy. 7. The building may be used for religious assembly and group meetings only during the weekend and after 6:00 p.m. on weeknights. 8. Preschools or schools are not allowed by this permit; however, this shall not preclude nurseries or Sunday School. 9. Maximum occupancy load of 505 persons shall be allowed as per Fire District recommendation. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY:•Dennis L. Stout, Chairman —' ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary F PLANNING, rOMMIS9 ON RESOLUTION January;d, 1986 ! CUP 85--38 - Victory Chapel Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Ccmmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby, certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and' adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at 'a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of January, 1986, by the fo_.-owing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS4 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i i r CITY OF RANCHPI CUCAMONGA C,�CA&f STAFF REPORT j °�� X z UI (> 197i DATE: January 8, 1986 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry,, R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara K.rali, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9530 - WALKER - A division of 7.7 acres into 2 parcels in the General Industrial District Subarea No. 13 locates` on thenorth side of 6th Street, east and west of new Rochester Avenue (;LPN 229-261-38) 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of _'arcel Map B. Purpose: To create 2 legal lots which have been physically diviold by new Rochester Avenue C. Locatian: North side of 6th Street, east and west of new Rochester Avenue D. P.r•cel Size: -Parcel 1 - 4.8 acres Parcel 2 - 2.9 acres Total 7.7 acres E. ,E-;fisting Zoning: Industriai Specific Plan, Subarea No. 13 F. Existing Land Use: Vacant _ G. Surrounding Land Use: Nurt:0, Vacant South Vacant East Vacant West - Existing Industrial Building H. Surrounding General Plan and bevelcpment Code Designations: North - Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 13 South - Industrial "necific Plan, Subarea 13 East- Industrial ,ec'i is Plan, Subarea 13 West Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 11 I. Site Characteristics: The site slopes approximatr.:ly 2% in a southerly direction and contains an abandoned vineyard. ITEM G PLANI,ING COMMISSION: STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 9530 January 8, 1986 Page 2 I . ANALYSIS: The proposed parcels were physically separated by the realignment of Rochester Avenue. -Rochester Avenue has been widen along Vte frontage of these parcels. Sidewalk, drive approaches, street lights and'streot trees will be constructed along the frontages of each parcel at time or development of the parcel. A portion of Parcel 2, as shown on the attached map, will be offered for dedication for the future •I-15 Freeway ramp at 7th Street. This alignment is based on the D.K.S. Preliminary Interchange Study. II. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Cw^.aission consider all input and elements of Tentative Parcel Map 9530. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, 4"A 00mhen, BRH:BK:de Attachments: Vicinity Map Tentative Map Resolution Recommended Conditions of Approval Initial Study a4. frFrr J/., nn r i 1l Lu N w su Site x ► 7th subarea 1 t � kt. • 6th o Via` e sub real'. Q subarea 12 LL m � Pt I ARIA CITY OF PROJECT: PARCEL MAP 9530 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLP: Vicinity Map ENGINEERING DIVI-010N �' EXHIBIT; A y,+,p��^.71L�^"+�.'-,.• rf.:..�."x`'Ir-:c: '.tz•S7♦y..-,'12'�ri '7 ,�7 rE.-c.•.` +�., �iTt+.•"�. tit;�r ..»..-' I' ♦♦�� l�w.w'• ��• _ ._-.. — ,..+.. :w F� I i q•.' yaBF t6 p • e•C t � Tpt i�'pp • h r i tlr lk WL . F / i ■ to fits L 71 .. r ' T - • f r � i ,.1_ ■'.'y 1•7 -' 7fOb I7 I I'• T.�C\i - • �4.+au,�� r ENVIRONALMAL RENT?,ET APPLICATION o -, o F Z1977 ' INITIAL STUDY- PART I GENERAL For all projects requiring environmental revie•r, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where tLe project applicatinn is r;"de. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare P-ri. II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning !commission. The Olanning Commission will' make one of tlree determinations (1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) :ne project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report w-11 be pre ,red, or (3) An additional ' information report should be supplied by the applicant niving further information concerning the propused project. Date Filed: n Project Title: '(�,�'i,+�e1J. Ci5 c� Applica-it'a MBnie, Address, Telephone: 1t_1. ;6etT14- (n(4yLV_d? — 2ChL�3��r Nana, Address, Telephone- of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: Location of Project: 'aK_M. �atiY3{�G�c7C�5clY1J�Jc41L- Assessor's Parcel No.: O 2 /3 J- Lis` other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and t'.ae agency issuing such permits:___ U E i PROJECT OESCRPTION' Proposed use or proposed project: 1-A*4 Z�1 •LC Acriage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if-any: 3. 1,5 PAG L is 2. ftr 'S AIL- Oescr-iuc the environmental setting of the project site including information on :opcgraphy, soil stability, pants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing stru�tnres and their use (attach necessary sheets): -ME l~Yf 1 x �,ir EESp t5_V�tCy4t�SY `Wti't 3t3- bi�tnp SUC44 t4 GuR�_r �a 1qWW 1p- fVdRl t V 1'1a�iPd N6 i�T�# �i4f�Asl�tc N.s VIEGZidYT-IM, nW AAfV&�fi,, Idl _ �utt�rty� `��� �.� .�r.,� t�,C�t- c�F �..� �►ram 2414 Is the project part of a larger project, -lie of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, May ss a whole have signific mt environmental impact AOL - I-2 1 WILL 'MIS PROJECT: YES NO I. Create a substantial change in ground contours? t� 2. Create a suttan`.•ial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? 3, Create a substantial change in demand for munizipal r services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 1/ 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or Genqral Plan designations? 5. Remove any ixi4ting trees? How many? 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosi•les?' Expianati n any YES aiswp^s above (attach additional sheets .if necessary): ' 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this-prloject r''ll generate dailys_ _ � 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project:-- —0.,. 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this _projeeL, in cubic, yards: tJo nl.r _ 10. If the project involves the construction of units, complete the Norm on the next p-,ge. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evacuation to the best of my ability,, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and J' belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to y be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made sy the Planning Division. Date: Signature - U�.sC�i �✓�� .. A Title t < 9- 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE+CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9530 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9530) LOCATED ON THE NORTH' SIDE OF till STREET, EAST AND WEST OF NEW ROCHESTER AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9530, submitted by W. Keith Waler and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the north side of 6th Street, east and west of new Rochester Avenue, being a division of a portion of Lot"36 of Rochester as per plat recorded in Book 9 of Maps, page 20, records of San Bernardino County, State of California; and WHEREAS, on November 25, 1985, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above-described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on January 3, 1986, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing :'or the above-descried map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the follow;=ng findings have been made. 1:. That ti,e map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposes' subdivision, is consistent-with the General Plan. 3. That the site is_ physically suitable for the proposed development, 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental dam,ge, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. r' SECTION 2: That this project will not create signif',cant adverse environmental impacts and a Negative 9eclaration i^ issued on January 8, 1986. SECTION 3: That Tentati•a Parcel Map No. 9530 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS OTH DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman G. r . ATTEST• Brad Buller, Depijty Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of tKe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do. hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coviission held U on thz 8th day of January, 1986, by tie following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: } s_ T CI','*'.' of RANCHO CUC_4MONGN RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION North side of 6th Street TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO: 953o east and west of n�M Rochester Avenue DATE FILED: December 5, 1985 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A division of a portion NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 of 96 of Rochest\,__is per plat recorded in GWiS ACREAGE: 7.7 book 9 of Maps, G-sge 20, records of ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 229-261-28 San Bernardino County, State nf California— DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER/SURVEYOR W. Keith Walker Same Sanderson & Assoc., Inc. 427 W. Dr_vde Street 9587 Arrow Rte. Suite L Glendale, CA 91202 Rancho`Cucamonga, GA 91730 Improvement and dedic,3t an requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. include, but may rcrt be limited to, the follorrings A. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights-of-way and all ,necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedicatinn shall be made Lf the followir:g rights-of-way on the following streets: ,additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on X 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. As shown on the tentative map. X_ 4. All rights of 'vehicular ingress and Egress shall be dedicated as follows: 6th Street j 5. Rec'procal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring F access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common, roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the-map. -1- X 6. Ali existing easements lying within future right-of-way are to' be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. X_ 7. Eaieirants for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. B. Street Improvements Pursuart to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120,- the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post securit' with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and/or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidevialk, drive approaches, I parkway trees and street lights on all i6terior streets. 2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement within a -40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed -For all half section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements, Prior to building permit issuance for each parcel that p contiguous to parcel. Curb & A.C. Side- Drive 3_tr7-et Street A.C. Median Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk Appr. Trees tights Overlay Islandw Other 6th r* X X Rochester X X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter **Meendnring X 4. -Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained prom the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permit- required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to, is;uance of an encroachment permit. 6. Dev0 oper shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary.- 7. Existing lines ,of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name sign,, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by *he City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be or, decorative poles with underground service. X _ 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. X 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Urdersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. C. Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Sngineer and City ,Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to building permit issuance for each parcel contiguous to teat parcel. 2 A lien agreement must be executA prior to recording, of the map for the following: 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and 1 Safety Divison prior to recording for and/or prior to issuance of building permit for D. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for accel4ance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The f"ollowing storm drain * shall be. cnstall:eu to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to rec)rdation of the map, a hydrologic and erainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drairagz detentirn basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff _ -3- , E. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading. plan. _X_ 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to '.ssuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. _ 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit wh`zhever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. F. General Requirements and Ap rovals X I. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: Ca?Trans for San Bernardino County Flood Control District X Cucamonga County Water District for .ewer and water X i San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (:.C.&R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of i`he map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructor. X 4. Sanitary sewer and wa-.er systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required, 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans/San Bernardino County Flocd Control,District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other Aft interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. j -4- x 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sever treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked.to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed .trail plan indicating widths, maxima.., sloPes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, iri accordance with City trail standards, shall he submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and/or prior to building parm-t issuancw> for x 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments undtr Assessment District 82-1 among the newly created parcels. x 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shali be submitted: Title Report,` traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps aao deeds used as reference and/or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. Notice of intent to •join the proposk!d Median Island Landscape District shall be fuled with the City Council prior to recordation of the Final Map. G. Special Conditions x 1. An offer-of dedication for the future I 15 rth Street Freeway off-ramp on Parcel No. 2 shall be provided_a,id shall be shown' a on the final map: x 2. The relationship of Parcel 1 to Buffalo Avenue shall be clearly shown on the final map. CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER. by: _5_ — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA_M STAFF REPORT < s 7 c� o v t^� DATE: January 8, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Czn Coieman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85- - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Section 7.02. 30 of the Dave opment Code pertaining to non- conformiig use I. ABSTRACT: The City Council has directed staff to prepay: an amendment to the Development Code to clarify the regulations pertaining to a change in non-conforming use. The purpose of this report is to explain the attached ordinance amending Section " 17.02.130 Non-Conforming Uses and Structures. II. BACKGROUND: The Non-Conforming Uses and Structures section of the Development Code is intended to limit the number and extent of non- conforming uses by regulating their enlargeme0-, their re- establis�ment after abandonment, and the alteration or restoration of the structures they occupy. In addition, this section •s intended to limit the number and extent of non-conforming structures by prohibiting their being moved, altered, or eniarghd in the manner that would increase the discrepancy between existing conditions and the standards prescribed in the Development Code. Section 17.02.130 (D) states that whenever a non-conforming use has been changed to a conforming use or has been discontinued for continuous Period of 180 days or more the .'an-conforming use shall re not a reestablished. However, this section does not -ad gs ddss the possibility of a request and the process whereby a new and different non-conforming use can replace the original non � conforming use. The proposed ordinance would amend the Development Cade to establish the procedure whereby the Planning Commission may consider a request to change a non-conforming use to a different non-conforming use provided certain criteria are met. These criteria would include; not allowing the construction of a new building, prohibiting a change of use to a use which is of greater intensity in terms of traffic, noise, density, parking demand, odor, light, etc., and that no alteration or reconstruction of the non-conforming structure i4ruld be permitted that would increase the ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Code Amendment 85-06 Janua,y 8, 1985 . Page #2 Ash discrepancy between existing conditions and the current regulations for the district 'n which the structure is located. It 'is recommended that the Punning Commission consider a request sub 1i ct to a Conditional Use Periflt orocess. III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completer! Part II of the In t al Study an concluded that the proposed amendment would notcreate significant adverse environmental impacts;. Therefore, staff recommends issuance of a Negative. Declaration. IV. Citi:RESPONOENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report ,newspaper. To date, no correspondence either for or against this proposed amendment has been received. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution recommending approval of the proposed amendment and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DC:ko Attachments: Initial Study Part II Resolution Ordi nan;:e �I l f ` CITY OF RkICHO CUCAMONGA PART II INITIAL STUDY ZNNVIRO'^!TNTAL CHECKLIST DATE: �(� APPLICANT: FILING DATE: j '^�/' LOG PROJECT: P%OJECT LOCATION. I. ENVIRONMXTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers *are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have .ignificant results in: a. Unstable ground condi',ions os in changes In gaologic relationships? >. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? {� c. :Change in topograph;r or gound surface contour intervals? d• The destruction, covering or-modification / of any unique geologic or physica: features? Any potential increase In wind or water erosion of .sails, site :ond�-tons? x iateing either on or off .. Changes in erosion, siltation, or deposition' / g. Exposure of people or property to geologic f hazards such, as earthquakes, land::lades, mud slides, ground failure, or*similar hazards? h. An increase in the Hate e£ extraction and/or use of any mineral resource? r,. 2. Tiydroloey. Will the proposal have significant results in: s »_ age" 6'',R4,C*� A' >3 r Page 1 YES w4YBE No a. Changes in currents, or the course of directic., jUk of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? Mr b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattern;, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood i waters.? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any :alteration of sur face ce water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? . Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? J I. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Q2a_1ity, Will the proposal have significant 1 results in• a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic t{- conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results In: a• Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? / b• Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare t or endangered species of plants? C Page 3 iES `-ANBE \0 c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of Plants into an area?, d. Reduction in the potential for agriculsirai production? Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare —5 or endangered species of animals? / c. Introduction of n_w or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing 7ish or wildlife habitat? S. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: AOL a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth xate of the human population of an area? L. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio_EcEconomic Factors. Wil. the proposal have significant results in: a• Change in local or regional socio-economic characteristics, includin,; econorlt or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or users?ro'ect project 7. band Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have significant resu, 'tt in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. Al conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact uron the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non-consumptive �- recreational opportunities? ~Page y YES .f4Y3E NO 8. Transvortation. Will the proposal have significant A results in a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? C. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? / j d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. 01terations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and LLL potential water-borne, rail, mass "transit or air traffic? r/ g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and/or historical resources? 10. Health, Safety and Nuisance_ Fa_ c _tors. Will the proposal have significant resultsin: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? 7`- b. Exposure of people to 'potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous --{ substances in the event of an accident? / d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms.? , , e e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? Auk / g. The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? Page 5 YES MAYBE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a,. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic / vista or view? L b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? / b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? Ask e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? / h. Fire protection? i. Police protection? J. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational fa alities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? 13.. Enercv and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? r� b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d: An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non-renewable forms cf' energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? ✓ _' /`7 - ! Page.6 YES WBE NO AM e. Substantial,depletion of any nonrenewable or Scarce natural resource? 14. Mandatory Findincs of Sienificance. a. Does the project have the Potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife 0 ula P P tion to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a.plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate Important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while I-,ng term impacts will endure well into the future),. c Does the project have impacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects), d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, ei-her directly or indirectly? IT, DISCL'SSZON OF E TIROMENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answer/to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation mea,ures). Page 7' III. DETER.�i_ INATIOy On t e basis of this initial w aluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a:significant effect. 0 n the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project+. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. EDI find the proposed project :LAY h a s nificant'ef c on the envirnment, and an E\'VIRON^IE�IT SPA. REPO 3s req re '. Date 5: ru e Title / 7 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION ?ECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85-06 AMENDING SECTION 17-02.130, OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PERTAINING TO NON-CONFORMING USE WHEREAS, on the 8th day of January, 1986, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds it necessary to clarify and revise the Development Code regulations pertaining to the discontinuation of non-conforming use. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission finds that the proposed Development Code Amendment 85-06 is an implementation of the General Plan goals and policies and that the General Plan Environmental Impact report adequately covers any potential significant adverse impacts. Further, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required pursuant to Division 13, Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code. Specifically, the Planning Corngission finds: A. NO substantial changes are proposed in any goals or policies which would require major revisions to the EIR. B. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to she circumstances under which the project is being 9 C. No new information on the project has become available. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Plann`Ag Commission has found that this project will not create a aignificant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on January 8, 1986, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section• 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt; the attached Ordinance amending Title 17, Development Code, Section 17.02.130, of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 2. That a Certified Capy of this Resolution ano related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. /a APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: •Dennis L.'Stout, Chairman ATTEST• Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of January, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Awl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY 'COUNCIL_ OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17, SECTION 17.02.130 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING NON- CONFORMING USE The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: follows: SECTION 1: That Section 17.02.130 is hereby amended to read as Section 17.02.130 Non-Conforming Uses & Structures A. Purpose This section is intended to limit the number and extent of non-conforming uses by regulating their enlargement, their reestablishment after abandonment, and the alteration or restoration after destruction of the structures they occupy. In aduition, this section is intended to limit the number and extent of non-conformin^ structures by prohibiting their being moved, altered, or enlarged it a manner that would increase the 'discrepancy between existing conditions and the standards prescribed in this Code. Ask B. Continuation and Maintenance 1. A use lawfully occupying a structure or a cite, that does not conform with the use regulations or the site area regulations for the district in which the use is located shall be deemed to be a non-conforming use and may be continued, except as otherwise limited in this Section. -2. A structure, lawfully occupying a site, that does not conform with the standards for front yard, side yards, rear yard, height, coverage, distances between structures, and parking facilities for the district in which the structure is located, shall be deemed to be a non-conforming structure and may be used and maintained, except as limited in this Section. 3. Routine maintenance and repairs may be performed on a non- conforming use or structure. C. Alterations and Additions to Non-Conforming Uses and Structures 1. No non-conforming use shall .be enlarged or extended` in such a way as to occupy any part of the structure or site or any other structure or site which it did not occupy at the time it became a non-conforming use, or in such a way as to displace' any conforming use occupying a structure or site, exccpt,as permitted Alk in this Section. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE DEVELOPK71NT CODE AMENDMENT 85-06 January 8, 1986 Page 2. No non-conforming structure shall be altered or reconstructed so as to increase the discrepancy between existing conditions and the standards for front yard, side yards, rear yard, height of structures, distances between structures and parking facilities as prescribed in the regulations for the district in which the .:tructure is located. D. Discontinuation of Non-Conforming Use. Whenever a non-conforming use has been changed to a conforming use or has been discontinued for a continuous period of 1_80 days or more, the non-canfti.rming use shall not be reestablished, and the use of the structure or site thereafter shall be in conformity with the regulations for the district in which it is located, provided that this section shall not apply to non- conforming dwelling units. Discontinuation shall include termination of a use regardless of intent to resume the use. r E. C� 'age of Won-Conforming Use. The Planning Commission may consider a request to change a non-conforming use to a different non- 1.0 J conforming use, provided that 1) there is no new structure, 2) sa ,l 1 use is not of greater intensity (eg, traffic, noise, density, parking ieA T demand, odor, light), and 3) said use complies with the provisions of Section 17.02.13OC2, subject to a Conditional Use Permit as specified in Section 17.04.030. .. Restoration of a Damaged Structure 1. Whenever a structure which does not comply with the standards for front yard, side yards, rear yard, height of structures, distances between structures and parking facilities as prescribed in the regulations for the district in which the structure is located, or the use of which does not conform with the regulations for the district in which it is located, is destroyed by fire or other calamity, by act of God, or by the public enemy to the extent of 50 percent or less, the structure may be restored and the non-conforming use may be resumed, provided that restoration is started within one year and diligently pursued to completion. When the destruction exceeds 50 percent of the structure is voluntarily razed or is required by law to be razed, the structure shall not be restored except in full conformity with the regulations for the district in which it is located and the non-conforming use shall not be resumed. 2. The extent of damage or partial destruction shall be bay-d upon the ratio of the estimated cost of restoring the structuc-. to its condition .prior to such damage or partial destruction to the estimated cost of duplicating the ehtire structure as it existed prior thereto. Estimates for this purpose shall be made by or shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Official and shall be bused on the minimum cost of construction in compliance with the Building Code. G. CityPlan_nneer_. Any request for alteration, expansion or restoration of a non-conforming use or structure shall be reviewed b the City Y Planner to determine compliance with the provisions contained in this CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85-06 January 8 1986, Page 3 Aft section, or refer it to the Planning Commission as specified in Section 17.02.130-G. The City Planner shall notify the applicant and - surrounding property owners of the decision. The decision of the City Planner may be appealed by any aggrieved party within ten (10) calendar days of the'decision. H. _Planning Commission Review. Thv Planning Commission shall conduct a puu lic hearing pursuant to )ection 17.02.110. The Planning Commission shall review each case and 31l matters of fact. The ` Commission may grant the request, grant the request with modification, or deny the request. The Commission shall state that the reque-t will or will not be detrimental to the goals and objectives of the General Plan and that such request will or will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The City Council finds that Development Code Amendment 85-06 is an implementation of the General Plan goals and policies and that the General Plan Environmental Impa.�t. Report adequately covers any potential significant adverse impacts. Further, the City Council finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required pursuant to Division 13, Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code. Ah Specifically, the City Council finds that: A. No substantial changes are proposed in any goals or policies which would require major revisions to the EIR. B. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken. i~ C. No new information on the project has become available. SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is hereby adopted for this Development Code Amendment, based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The D.=aily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this *'day of *, 19*. AYES: NOES ABSENT: i CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE f DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85-06 January 8, 1986 Pave 4 Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authe ems, ity Clerk I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the * day of *, 19**. Executed this * day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Bever y A. Authelet, City C er CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c�ICA140 STAFF REPORT ;. 0 0 F Z U DATE: January 8, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW '85-38 - AJA The Development of 4 multi-tenant industrial buildings totaling 63,000 square feet on 4.92 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) located at the southeast corner of 7th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 209-211-21, 36, 37. T. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, elevation and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacart; General Industrial District Subarea 4, General industrial/Rail Served District Subarea 5 South - Multi-tenant industrial buildings; General Industrial District Subarea 4, General. Industrial/Rail Served District Subarea 5 East Multi-tenant industrial buildings; General Industrial District Subarea 4, General Industrial/Rail served District Subarea 5 West Multi-tenant industrial buildings, vacant, single family residences; General Industrial District Subarea 4, Low Residential District 2-4 du/ae, Industrial Park District Subarea 16 C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial, General Industrial/Rail Served South General Industrial, General Industrial/Rail Served East - General Industrial, General Industrial/Rail Served West - funeral Industrial, Low Density Residential, Industrial Park ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF iEPORT .'anuary 8, 1986 DR 85-38 - Aja Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and vegetation consists of mainly weeds. Existing multi-tenant industrial park is immediately south of the site. The existing well site located on the south side of 7th Street belongs to Cucamonga County Water District. II. ANALYSIS: A. Geneval: The proposed develepment consists of two smaller buildings which front on Archibald Avenue and two larger industrial buildings that are located on the east side of the site. A centralized plaza area is located between Buildings One and Two that provide for interconnection among all buildings. The plaza area is provided with bollards, seating area and attractive landscaping. The proposed elevations for Buildings One and Two consist of tilt-up concrete panel with rev*als, and include such architectural elements as tile roof, round concrete columns and colored metal awnings that serve as building entrance statement. The proposed elevation for Buildings Three and Four consist of tilt-up concrete panel with smaller plaza areas in the middle of the building that serve as an entrance statement. B. Design Review Committee: The developer has worked with the Committee in revising the project to address the concerns of the Committee regarding expanded plaza areas and eliminating storefront design. The Committee reviewed the revised site plan and elevations and has recommended approval with one condition as follows: The developer should work with the Cucamonga County W,,te;, District in providing the Water District with reciprocal egress and ingress to the well aite, so that the existing drive approach on 7th Street coulu be removed. The developer has contacted the Cucamonga County Water District who informally agreed to such proposal.. C. Utility Undergrounding. Overhead utilities exist along the Archibald Avenue fro-htage of the proposed project. This property is one of the two remaining frontage parcels on Archibald that could be undsrgounded by development. To do so, the applicant would be required to extend southerly approximately 200 feet on to th( r.d3acent frontage where undergrounding construction would involve destruction and replacement of existing landscaping as well as recently completed street construction_ Therefore, the Engineering �-a PLA-JNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT January 8, 1986 DR '5-38 - Aja; Page 3 Division is recommending that the utility undergrounding be waived for this project at this time, and that an in-lieu fee be collected as contribution to a future undergrounding project along; the frontage. D. Environmental Assessment: Staff' has completed the environmental checklist and has determined that the proposed two foot high flood wall as a mitigation measure eliminates any significant impact of flooding as'a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with the---,, findings, issuance of a ° Negative Declaration would be in order. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project z; consistent with the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan. T'ie project will not cause a significant adverse environmental impact and in addition the proposed use, building design, site plan, together with the recommended Conditions if Approval are in compliance -* th the Industrial.Specific Plan anu all other applicable provisions of the City standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission MW issue a Negative Declaration and approve Development Review 85-38 through tile adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF:das Attachments: December 30, 1985, Memo to File Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit I-," .- Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Coni,eptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" E1Fvations Initial Study Part II • Resolution of Approval with Conditions MEMO TO RLE Record of: Date 1: , Meeting Proj. Desc. Conversation Phone No. _ Time 1 Z h•N Name: _ Representing; . TOPIC ' ACTION: . i � t f f CIRCULATION O 920'R.C3.W. AT-& SF R.R. MINEMM Sth r - �� ,�ti"�x3 fau.'ac'° "gym` ,.:!+;n p a .,i •8. _.-;ass R.O.W. A�TM" subarea' .; .. a . RAIL Existing -I--l--f +++ P► posed ath TRAILS/ROUTES 0000 P �� ,, .( edestrian :sz subarea 0000 Bicycle. •` O ff, 5 �Q© Regional MuOti-Use O iec;,l Streetscape/ S O 4 6h escaping ............�" -er Line/ Utility Easement O Access Points A W subarea Q lid �5 p Q 4th NORTH. CITY OF TZAl�TC 1 CLTCAMONGA 1"IFrtit• T1Ti.E- 14ranAy A11fr'p PLANNING DIVISION EX9. 1BIT: SGatF: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL MMTFTEMANT - L cuaueaa+eprry INDUSTRIAL 7TH�STREET.--_l I CDYMERGAL * DISTRIBUTION 'B100. BLDG. R-1 HOUSING � I � I .MULTI-TENANT t t I UIDUSTfSAL -T IH I �MULTI•TENANT AYILTI-TEH�Nt I 61 to u INDUSTiSAL COII$;M I 1 .' LUILTI-TENANT WDUSTRIAL cc Iz w 'MA:TFTENANr 1 ,1 �'S 1 jbOUSTRML ;� 1 TI-T= It 1 uauSTinAI. `I ,.AVAti- UENERAL.UOUSTPoAL. NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CIJ I CAMONGA TITLE: : T TLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXt ItBm _SCALE=-� r� ��.1T8Y1� N Ml Ri ••_iJ ij1 .•rJ J ..' _ . N.i �' — i �. � }� -��! 4 .�,1 t•itwtrteauinw c - 1 1 !LY'' w ti:I < i�c� • Y � � •.v' ... mates. _war v:.prr 1Md __� J •.V. �� STRW Z. TABMATION I'.7 :6D0 � lnta ReOD lntO itiYL I-�: t taara Qaraad U MW a •tar* UCV= Y(V= 1:. surs ucvas r tvaati 4' •TOTK rLr at: in 2" Gs • 'rfi a�✓rf at]IY:Ji[ aiw7 sotorwat ante niar ar wvmsaa rs l i' waacera t""m an isrusA "Aw V. . . NORTH r CITY OF iT �I:_ .3 ECHO CUCAMONGA T4-L.E: PL.ANNI1N'G DIVISION EXHIBIT- SCAL;E:____� AWA - � A Fwpw 11 faro 1. . iiaw. iim,r ..a.w 41 u.r.T ��•-�.--1 � K� ;.itr�-,��at'r-1f��J' BLDG BLOG NORTH ' CITY OF, AA t rrrlvi:_ AINCHO C VTCAAIONGA TITLE: R PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT. SCALE- i 71, wpm in ac _ r��• - '.1� jam. - •^�-'_^� NORTH CITY OF ITELvI: '-3� RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE. PLANNING DIVISIO-q EXHIBI r--_ SCALE- W+. F,.'G`. Via:• � � � J �• imp. � y = II fit♦ Y� ._ >u -- WE tYt.....J <�I ;Olm I I.', a- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAXONGA PART II — INITIAL STUDY ENVIROMMNT.AL CHECKLIST DAM APPL=CAb'T <ivG FILING DATE: <+_ LOG NUMBER:lfizrmp PROJECT; .yC ►!r�/T/ -T6i{I I r PROJECT LOCATION: ' 7 I. E*IVIRONMNTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all It sheets). yes" anc "maybe" answers are required on attached YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Geoloev. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic rel&tions'tips? b. Disruptions, displacements, compar 'ion or burial of ere soil? r C. .Change in topography or ground surface ,( contour intervals? / d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e• Any Potential increase in wind or water erosion of Soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? y "hanges in erosion siltation, or deposition? - 8• exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud— slides, ground failure, or•similar hazards? ✓/ h. An increase in the rate of extraction and/or use of any mineral resource? 2. H droloa. Will the proposal have significant results in: Page YES MAYBE ho a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing streams', rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? / b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, `/ or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? e I c- Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? / d. Change in - -' the' amount or suz;.face water in any /body of water? ✓ e. Discnarge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? ✓/ f- Alteration of groundwater characteristics? ✓ g: Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? / h. The reduction in the amount of water other- v wise available for public water supplies? f I. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air�ty. Will the proposal have significant results inn. a. Constant cr periodic air emissi ns from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? Y �, b. ,Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or ✓ interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota -- Flora. Will the proposal have significant results �1 a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b• Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare V or endangered species of plants? ?age 3 YES MAYBE No C. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural ' production? f Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant results V in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers Of any species of animals? y Vf b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? V c, Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 5. PODtllation. Will the proposal have significant V results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distr:L bu.ion, density; diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? y b. Will the proposal affect existing housing„ or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio-Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change iu local or regional socio-economic characterist+,cs, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property / values? b. Will project costs be e,-Atably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, y ,n tax pavers or project users? 7. Land Use and Plannine Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non-consumptive recreational opportunities,? v Page 4 YES. 11 YSE NO 8. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant-- in: ' a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? C. Effects on existing parking facilities, or ,[ demand for new parking? ` d. Subatantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circulate tion or movement of people and/or goods? -. Alterations to or effects on present -_nd potential water-borne) rail, mass t ansit or f air traffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, / bicyclists or pedestrians? 5. Cultural Resources. Will the vroposa have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, J paleontological, aid/or historir-al resources? ✓ 10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors, Will the proposal have significant results in: A. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? Vle' b. Erposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous. substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? ' f- Exposure of �eopla to potentially dangerous ,L noise levels? / 9. The creation of objectionable odors? �`, h.' An increase in light or glare.? Page 5 YES :L4YBE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? f b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services, 'sill the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following. a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? c Communications systems? d. Water supply? lz a. Wastewater facilities? f f. Flood control structures? f`. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? f i. Polce protection? r J. Schools? i k. Parks or other recreational facilities? �- 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? , f m. Other governmental, services? ][.f 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results int a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon L;ristirg f Sources of energy? ` c. An Increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? f d 4`1 increase or ei etuation of V p p the consumption of non-renewable farms of energy, wren feasible. renewable sources of energy are available? Page 6 YES MYBL No Alk e.. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quali-i of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate P important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does t^e project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relativeSy brief, definitive period of time while long / term impacts will endure well into the future). J C. TLes the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable � Wr means that the incremental effects of an :. ind,vidual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). _ d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION OF WRIIRONMENTAL PVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to the w-re questions 1 diacus� on of proposed.mitigation _ "u3" P P measures). Hydrology (b), (i) The construction of this project will increase the amount of paved surface area which could result in an increase in the amount of surface water runoff and a decrease in the absorption ratO,- However, the pr000sed drainage system for this project will handle this increase. .'pie development of the site could expose people and property, especially downstream ' properties, to flooding. A preliminary hydrology report has been prepared which requires the construction of a 2 foot flood wall along Archibald Avenue as a flood protection mitigation measure. (This is added to the project.) Page 7 II1. DETEB.KIyl:TION v On the basis of this initial evaluation: Ak j\ I I find 'the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. t find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described,on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. ElI find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the envirnment, and an EWIRO,MI ENT MPACT REPORT is required. Date r ign:atu e Title: AOL Cam, Aft RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE'RANCHO CUCA1ONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 85-38 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBAL➢ AND 7TH STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 21st day of October, 1985, a complete application was filed by Aja &Associates for review of the above-described project; and WHi�REAS, on the 8th day of January, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan 2. That the proposed use is in accord .rith the objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of. the applicable provisions of the Industrial SpeJo.fic Plan; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable Thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health," safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the. vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adversE impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on January 8, 1986. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 85-38 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: A Planning Division: 1. The design of the flood wall along Archibald Avenue shall be included in the detailed landscape plan. 2. The material for this flood wall shall be of concrete material compatible with building Ank design. Sample of such material shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION January 8, 1986 DR 85-38 Aja Page 2 3. Detailed plans of the pedestrian amenities within the plaza area shag. be included in the landscape plans to be submitted for review and approval priur to issuance of building permits. 4. Special landscape treatment shall be provided along Archibald Avenue that takes into consideration the required flood wall protection. 5. Special landscape treatments such as specimen size trees, accent trees and intensified landscaping shall be provided at 'project entrances on 7th Street and Archibald Avenus. 6. The applicant shall provide and record an ingress and egress easement through the project site to the Cucamonga County Water District well site parcel to the satisfaction of the Cucamonga. County Water District and thv City Planner prior to issuance of building permits in order that the existing well site drive approach along 7th Street can be removed. Engineering Division: 1. A Letter of Intent to join the proposed Median Island Landscape District shall be filed with the City Council prior to issuance of building permits. 2. -1 flood protection wall shall be provided along Archibald Avenue and 7th Street. The previous flood study shall be expanded to verify the limits of the wall required along 7th Street. 3. The applicant shall pay, prior to issuance of the building permits a fee in lieu of undergrounding overhead utilities fronting Archibald Avenue. Said fee shall be held for contribution to future undergrounding of the fronting facilities. All services extended to the site shall be undergrounded. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OR RANCHO CUCAt10NGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary . -ao PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION January 8, 1986 DR 85-38'- A3a a, Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify tt•°:t the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and w _'.;Yted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th flay of January, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: z. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSe 4 . 6 FE-d 0 V L 6 g d U A q L! y r O a L« djd6�OO d Z 4 4 O . nQg L udi E O O a 0 OL C r NL O. yn n.V U ^ AG d0 d n09`o2 O CO Q.O Cin� u m OnEun d N a c n p A G -~E. q d W _ L dy r`CV NC 6 `2.6 C_Q 2Tu dYlrc YQ V.tpi.`.y drW o. = d CV�01 O M d 6? t QUO YNNu� CL^ Ow 600 'pq^.dC n�l.O A'•• =- L y p N a �..- .- EST L a 1 z r 'rE U C 2. !1 W a Et6 6^•A =i q .a = E uO E 0 G ayd V-E A 9dL CEO` O. L A u V «EO yd ^ n 0 b A g c O d q =d N •a'G d y v Si..1L nrn a -3 110 m^N o e`O..^..50 gg LyN LEA` NN ^ ea .-.G A ddY It y d A p n N V E N t o C d u ¢O Q O N L C N O.Y y d q N q A 01 d A d V p •y O..O i c'C u q O L^ Ot. Nd n EY 4 L.ya uq YHA^ v cua AyN i.no..eps• ¢. a,N aw 0oL aZ •. L N V .0 NE n qS T ^�U nn Y O Ai q d y .`. O Ld A EO NOq 6LOC i dV Y 4EQ^ e e C 6 4 p O Y u O 4C( wu o a= Y d dd5. �a P O a i ta pNi A �^�+ -W d W N L u o w E d c ! b'N^Y A 69 2 N L A=` C G a N 6 N W d= 4 0 A aA ,`G p L p ti Ash • b. O rl �lVl� IOI f i• N m f ems\ 2 1 t O M'OL q=lu.LO 6 .. N _ • F ( 01N Aapi. QN .'6 C0 L =L H,CGa+dY�yOj C md> o.S.dT V a�A a of �N:oea�c _ = Ldd. •di d=y id WY OL c u c noq .0 o Z V x Ny .. o q n= a ..dA n d= v d `N O A CI = d Oy pgLO^A 12 N G Ld�. d iO. A..pIM G+AY ' S 9 6 6q L y. ^Z 9 mGMCa a�gY I� 2 YN 4^Y d 6N ` d 0.. E E U Y G C N q G Air& Y J >.�C E q q nd Sdu d1 yY YO L c •� ''4y n..-L.. i n n N u :p ave d"N hw a'i o a fL•A 6�S.�o0-t `1-aa .T'�C�C db Np� C�TOT -Ou< ^dTb db dY • EY1r d.T �Ka.Ld a c o^u0 �d d C EE C N E � r�6 Y a.O C W A L �.V • a~Q G N q dpLL G� Y L 6 O G A NbDC )'^ n �Q ybN O vpi�G�u. ` 9 b ...Aq Z. •� 00 U9GU t A wt UUOt O.O,. N E dq.q. O E dG_T Ld G �N Y ^ N O 2 Y ON L L M.A G T y y 6>...q 0= L G U • t Y L b E�T, a-I O..f,p O q d '=Fd -t dam^ y bq� C coNs ro.`� w.i ob 13 dN nz. Lq`ua u.N T N.2.2� �.e - b NAscx,d c s V d L d u _ L x j e Q G E 6 Qu bGCG' �MUA YS.G OS' �O L O �.dN V•C< ~�Ma NA bUCN LEdq • V'Yo� M.dd` E GgOq� gYLupi u 0.1 . p��Mr 7a.^SOV-, d Yayp �Q4E G p•L•O T LO bA .p rl� �'EbC opo> 6m.. g A �a w qr. LG NdDO rnA a p qy.W qVN^A d..Oq LL.. ATQ dgCtOlpu^ NL _NCgN VC TQN ndp NQ ^ q2 GM5 ON Sb.Tq O a. Yt'A d<�4<p.0 C421 Tpb YAw0. N C�6 60 y 6EVM6..GA�6 CnNoY<va'� Y�YN �CGn .M G y Mc �N. 22 4U. C 4 d {f W. ^= GC q:LLepip N66 • ~I ~I ~I ` �I �I MI QI bl q b1C� a py g� y_TN ^p A b6N�b.Y..bN YdC N M. :9 d iW idC pu b�6 QS G6 Q Og N�GyELN pQ VOo d�i== Ly. t^ qy N � NCpC ` 6a�S Wb y^� O'��•i,.E ye. N LOp� V „ Y p C C K 9 • C.>. q u c G M:q G V O U a U,.GG. UW% Yq E i C C N L q u g I. C C 9 q.i N d..p. yG q OL dOtA A^.0 �O N AW 2.•N6p Oby <t. NL •VV,.GC'd f~gggL. C pL.-M a YO Ua r. �a ftCLQN .Gd� q9 o ^^N C N A N L Y N i p L pp C d M....+^O p d •y V. C Mry a q�yy^ G dYO ay:5 :� L A MGgNq qO CEO q26 AG L•^`bNOap.� d • y 9 - b6 q ^ d EOE N y d t O V OC.A D aO•'G'�I 6 L>a 2p O. bN': b� Wb c2 LNOI K dy�V. ='�90 01 b L O L G•� O A O^ b U....C b 6 dL A q E=pOnj 0 O O A O d. L C L gGNN LA y >=01. {L •�L A`9 qb Ob .' � dG J G Lb qtN yy A a d c �, b q�O w.E y��E dq^H Y669 y.0 � 0 d pEq L.1 g6pq OC�QE Cy�'•-yY Nut ^. d ^ O CN < •NO.= _� d.. ^ .tltl N c G nr up cY u �b^dTp�N LbE V.. �LUdU421 LqyCE b.p bGL.bM.. AC EGbd90 "o O .�Oa cG p bC M >O^e>.Db QL�T6 C t ^ZEE6 ypL dq L u 1LG�0 U .G.>NU V GL yn�.d yi0 LAM_ yL�n0 b ^Y 4A 6L 6' •6 hLN 6�vyia NOq ;;z JMO.nOW -4�2 5'G dNN C N .dG H -. t.+.lt A H q q:itl..p b h m OI .OV n�i n H a ao �o a �y c'tY' `o o. dG1NLA� -.uMa �u naY. y O ^ n q doh O G �O UG a O'qd O t NN. G rd OIC 6 d Y E V A.Hm � G Y 9 A ^t N p 22 -X.R, O C C 6 A 9 p �. I• y qY d 'L O..p d a T— A d II g N � • Ol A � u N .y S. .n. OIpV K ^L nNC O.^ Yl dam. NO as YT A9 py •+L a. •�i Y O ay Nd r NNddd Sy jCY Ea �� N.p L C L.L9 ld. AqC Y C¢��Ngi+ 0 9 l 0 ,C4+ M a r q L p d N d CyM. O dT dLp ^Q.. N L LC'q d Gy L Nc O pT • E Oy 001 K a1 q. d dd L yOdn6N LNO G qr.. �nA9 qV�01 '3•N � OyL ni "' a^A u NY AY. d � 111 dad d A. A x t C q N d Ep_ u q Y L p L y N E.0 6L..p Ld a C n Ge A..9.C 9 p T N m ,. i Ev Ed .LidY dL� N.t..>.� O.L L. � G AN KN^ 6vai 3No 1- NZ 6N .�qy qA^N n0 KA�00. Ku 1i o.A.nN :•T N C N 1G N. m q .�-• AM O 91 l L C^ o E d m n �� N ^�� • O G NZ C G A^ q.>^ 4 �yaj^ <a CN {¢y N^2 �' NGYi.L O.d G'G^ dqG C�enl I. d66 Y. C 9 6 9 N yyj • d 6� dw Em 112 9 y a T O O n C G d L ZZ ^ «G O C Y F ZC t NL YdL9 Eq A^ 99 Lqa> aC -N A.o .O� 2 >.n0 Y9aa. G d. 09 h L TLy pN ^mn dO�Vgd <O> O L.^ r Oly N n0 UFO Q. , quyg2 �t3♦ 66 C y OL p YY N o0 CL� yi. OLY dd. 0o d C G N G O GdOL n nn O Ans d6 A y aa O 9 d Y GG OC y lNd yL. GO. T' d'a d, ^NZ 6 W Nyt Y 9^ 9 Y �N .^� O•d��od u=a N 2. 9 9G�p Nd L2ay .pNLVy� EU N "O Lpro cLAE9 6 Y. ' d� ll t lti ya DIY A.60 Olj Y _ • �^' ^_ N.L y4. E Z6 �aqj 9 9a nC y,Y�.e N^ al 1p.Cp 9NGY GaI Y A N Cam. 90t or r O. HM A Nq�� n gg d >a y Y d N L n G Y• �b C Y C yy0 Vy y >Y O a• ECIy �^VC d qp^ q ^ C 1 0 G YT L d 4.V L u� d q C O v 9 m ` �•q L C O N a y; q O^6 L p d. • N^.tg! •.•.YnFa ^Y.O� a �� %Ou M d CL r>L 9^O L E N6 2o a Ar L 4Y N``O K AYL.m ?� 69N lu puni Kti 60 � N�A 6C.p 4A� W66-4 MNM4 t. �p •�1� , N � O 1h Ip U N LMY d�P ad��Od Cq CAq `r d0-7 O1U �dD gTY LLU L Ya C r EE roN`L1 adj cdC • " ud pp O pF� �rfi bRn OyL:�_ y. U. Prod gbLLc d > p 0.N ' mq.` W Cd r0= CU = PUO �dW.i.tyi =ytpqq � �N u�.m. Co9: LEV N J dC.N..Y d�a=inU cCnd CI. au A O pd�.Y C iM q L� DOO lCL C^Y dNN W.p... mNNN ^' ti". •L �qf¢.1� q.LOL Ll N � ^m a...�0 �md C L 4.7 ✓d N U.U A d. t d Yy .C FG 6t€u L�'L b A. C O.y ta. W U OOq C.y O SWw N 01 Y m �� Q1 O•P Op4' 3.q L Y f.a 2 y'Ca.U+. gqO..q q aLi L. .� Vj�.L Y� NT2"C. OI L.0 W C4r Yr~imYY LY W meq 6.o NY.r cN. L 9Ee ypC.V'nn° a�1e�o oqO 6 " E -1e L`^E�- Q. yy 6WP d6 ro P U E NE y YC ro C L pp.. y V b E G ap.•tQ. C O Y n.t r �d yC 4p4 OTC q .- N mON S sV�✓ qp dy 6l �gyaU �N rN 4 . Cu2 8 V•_.G _.~` �/JW�O OLL C1 dC^ �N�E pJ.yYN _ •'.O• ^�G Na+` 6F.u6 p d �H a�i u ` Oqd v� d�.qa✓ ^ =L: qal •� O ✓ mp,. q. d O w y. Q•.L y L S Y n G 6i w q ✓.TNY Y� US 6,2 N2F V Ly n'^IC^C N rah m pC UU C^ dUrZr vq d W OT. m c�1.01 7E�YE • r9 N�aj d .s¢,V " 6d O •.0 q L C� o...... G�y.O. eGar-iC01 W. O 4. ro uu•n �CQi O'�}6 c A Lp .`�N>a1 Vlr S.2. YEC SI. 9c� . •u L 9 L\y. 09 N� r O 9 L�T����LLy O,d. A L Y S E d a✓Qi t p a•q U ` ... yal 1� .--V16 Hmq O u L 6P m W^ . LCA3 Li 4dl YI - N � O•S al 6+ �oLL1 6ua 1�. 5•-oa a N�aP�u ��m Novo. m o .C�.4 s. a m. .Y a q L qd '�pL al N'O = L•J N C Ne E 11.2 •a N N O. p c L Y.L y m O 6 nN C.� �n6 OUC C 2q ^ •Ju ...0• C SAY Ny uNL� Y 9mN _dYb � din. 1 Y�pp N d OS YC .9 O N= yNP N W9 r C p w > nN > y„_ pC st: _ s $N N TJd A 9:S q✓qm 9 d N i dop a v d L a+ "n pL'vc� a�: nY. a«d. "' pq ua e'O a•'°1 eL �i Wv� !. " 0.L�.... O q yqN O• _ ^D...N C Oro .0 ma 4 ✓m0 � �~o •u pc9 0. E T u Ny C � •„�r N� ' �d 6 P N` O' CI L O >._ d Y LUL C a daN� LM Opy NN d. ✓ =yp� uC U L �CAON pl C L L i� Lam+ NdgG. vC '� �jTti OTLC� yd+d n. v C0.VE !j CL qN �•¢ Q NO NON L N.pd d 6p S V q'a � N q q•• >• Ytc C a d L 20 O �L O Z .L. GPLd qL�� y6 yLW '^.ML qL TaLi C.N q T8a � � C � t�pP M� NNE NafpL Q N A U c q•� N c+ S wcc Lo—`.mu c� aor, •n+uq'�m ZZ ate d Um Y � OFcO' L L Tq 'c9 N� qN� N .. LT Ldp mq NO L c01+C � 616 6N L �N Y O CM. �� ,,Cc L 0.0 nC pW $1 1-�N m U•t• N N c 2 y L J L E•` 6 F p+ p� a 6.m C Y N I C yl� �E.2 6 W•+ YOl va,Go^coN N.nw u v �nLbrn ^« B. OVQC :c E m •' b A H 0.17. d c C L.� � � a V `EE ^P15 I LM`� b py�• - d A N N • q Y TN ".6O E L a r L. ,nE .w qNm y �> > l dq Ny CO4 W. C n4-�"• '�^00 .c. EN.q pM. C C C. Lua N CC>'.O LO^y L u u y>6 Yt c p+ a o. arq y_C 6^L b y dy. bd. 9 A ViC NEo� 2y �O ny R'' ggLii N.^ YY�N OE b Yea iyN. p OIH y Y G L A + YO^ye c9 9rC � `T N Lo ^ AgYE oq� d VH NA Y. p.. qL 0q1 O u p 6 ^EOp V^� qcC eel E � N Z GOw V.md 60o YOgN OY U.q Va+ q 0 y rnr� O^�V bq0 AML V C '. Y y p ttD��•L.d. O Y > C 00 Ow. nn UO QF K«6LG 4Vu O 2 W J L� C va YCY d Y. Gq ueT LO -N r u u Eio A ': VN. Nm C SyG ^ Ow 'O a L �O OIeL L�yOC Al ' .0 C V 'N.w N f.1 0' C Y Y GO Hp 4• . v a TGG� Cy YM aq' ^ < q.•V. u� C VUM `.Yyq �� V,C VY „� b` q.^q O'.i N d V.. NO c dNc Nnpq .•y dd yE CN C a NE d4 OC ^ CINd • N ^� Oy v b '€ q i u q L O EY ^� b hl u Y '.^. nU qu G VMpp �A L V N.GY aON� �>LLnO PUN Oq �L NY NY: M Y NOWT Ot OL +bjj.� ... 6 9 n^•'L L WE p C�q '. V ou .p+c cYN�u O• N« O�. U •q V O T L y C 6 O L^ Y d C M Cl u EL O . y. Yp2�"N 1 1141 Nn0 q V � OY. q~ �OaUi Yb O NVON� QggO O:O.+ E�L 4xJ WNVWY1..1 '�6 L'l�62 4r60 Q O\Y FAO Q .0 � N r =-;2t N•'ot y o moo oa; «�ti 61 ooaas .d, '1° tidy a: L +ca. w� " ,^ •- d a E N N T O q O M L LOOAO+ V L VCu4EE d y u Y � S m L¢I�. Y O .LO^> 6 N•.. N N CnM ^ N _ a r Yo•Ni L' ``" « ' '"4a«. c vs uaN a R u a,au op pg« Nr q! a Nc. '" C7 0: poo ceEcpop,,C. o Y.ea 'e 4A Lo4'cY n. �L � •� a n ^ O C p. �•"E p R p V� u R C d�9� � A � Q.. 9 Rq� quq • AU N.V T E.YL .G� `� G ^Y O L N. y C U Y^ C2 j •`.C.� Ap a ZU M. p u 9 Z v p SYN C 5•G+.>+O ��� Nc� L NY d.G L V"a ? � dOW^ Qq 6 yp� EE�LI E O p L 2 y Y �A c L dni^ �o pu opa c°1 4 Y_ p L u c O E N N W.A •C pN« OEM y Lyu QU LG. K.. NLLU 2D. UO. 4. t M a U d EE L L a O• Y 92�.0 9 M C C ~ O ��a i a�r q t C E d � Cam. Z N 2p V O F �1"1 ! C � wC� `Q u •q O L Y O d •R J O C y L T Olp� CE a YOy�r. vm. N '^ d's _� �w«c AID � 'c L y. a.:s• L O CZ LG ~LO i� �� p dYT yu O Q t S= `f[ •-v L E�N C y N n fi a p` a 10 2 n d 6 0 ay0 O y � N 3 d Y L N U P m • . p O CQ � • L.�: 6 .� N U= u R N l ` G 0.2 >9 " Ie'o J GA 4.CL WS i U�9N0: 4L U� Y Q 4 � '6 ur�iU a o G, r( Au dm o d i d n o nu qu M u� fi A qML • a= d � d p E :n j _ C N E ✓ � d o �. va °10 =o Y NL L "q .n Y n a eLi z 6a d L" s L � o� > q d Y O d O a t C L non c�Y u L°i we ry Tu � tvc d it +•,� o « �..d � �, '�u O Y • ^ d c d q a G.u.. aJ C V a+ BE w Sd �q y dNe "� c1r on o0 o�v� 4 a.Lo, 4n ipuda. `•.I�HI Yf �D ` N Fl— e 0 as yq Yam.. ed ♦. LYum c �. a � .ads Y$aq '° a `"„ " v � � �+ •a d d V C G fix O ^a dy yea 'mod Y. t " s... L.- a qa •- ,,, �L d. qu do aov o.2 i.E YL.� dyG L~ CQ gdYq n � n0,. dU zz; aC dL %- G— Eo LU d i� a L p 9 C 4 Li to u c ^ V Y Y q L OAS q o EO a. L U Yy' dC C6 �j0 YaW y'u c a moo .�a u f d^d vas K CM d 414 T — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GVCAN STAFF REPORT 2 � O o U DATE: January a, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-43 - CHRISTES0�1 COMPANY - The development of a two-story retail office building totaling 21,000 square feet within an approved integrated business center (Virginia Dare) in the General. Commercial D strict located at the northwest quadrant of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN 1677-661-6. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: ApprGval of detailed site plan and 41 elevation. B. Surrounding land Use and Zonin North - Vacant ta shopping center has been approved ! recently); General Commercial District South Phase I of the Virginia Dare Business Center, Vacant; General Commercial District East - Vacant; Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Planned Community West - Deer Creek Channel, Existing Industrial Use; General Commercial District C. General Plan Designations: Project Site General Commercial North - General Commercial South - General Commercial East Community Commercial West - General Commercial and Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and rough graded. Phase I of the Virginia Dare Business Center is almost completed and Del Taco Restaurant is under construction. II. ANALYSIS: f A. General: The site is a former Garrett Winery and has an F approved Master Plan which established building areas, parkin i areas, and architectural program that reflects the winery theme ITEM J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 85-43 - Christeson Company January 8, 1986 Page 2 and mission style architecture. Recently the Planning Commission has approved Spire Restaurant and a six-plex Edward's Cinema within this Master Plan (see Exhibit "B"). The detailed site plan and elevation for this proposed two-story retail/office building is consistent with the approved Master Plan and architectural program. ?'_:{gn Review Committee: The Desigr, Review Committee hate reviewed the; project and recommended approval with the following conditions which the developer has agreed to: 1. A rscessed quadrifoil on the second story of the northern elevation be provided. 2. A texturized pedestrian connection be provided to the Del Taco Restaurant across circulation aisle. 3. A texturized pedestrian m0 kway be provided to connect with the northerly project (Brunswick). The developer of both projects s:juld coordinate the location of this pedestrian walkway. l 4. The arbors shall be planted with vines and creeping varietie_,, of vines or ivy against walled surfaces throughout the project, reminiscent of the original winery. 5. The planter area in front of the arbor adjacent to the east and the north elevations be expanded to . provide adequate space for tree planting. The developer has revised the site plan and elevation to incorporate Condition Nos. 1, 4 and 5 as "awn in Exhibit "C'!, "E", and "FU, C. Related Parking Issue• The Planning Commission on July 24, 1985 regular meeting ;onditionally approved the six-plex Edward's Cinema which is immediately adjacent to this proposed office/retail building. To assure that there is adequate. parking within this business center, the Planning Commission imposed a condition of approval for Edward's Cinema (see attached Resolution 85-112 and Condition No. 3). This. condition of approval has been appealed and is pending City Council review on February 5, 1986. In consideration of the pending, appeal, the Commission riav wish to continue this item until Council action the intent of Condition No. 3 of Resolution 85-112 was to require a parking analysis if a proposed office structure requires more than 85 parking PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 85-43 Christeson'Company January 8, 1986 Page 3 spaces. Since this project only requires 84 parking spaces, it would not be affected by said condition. However, the Committee recommended_full Planning Commission disc!isson on the parking issue. D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed - the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant adverse environmental impact as a result of this project. Further, a Negative Declaration has been issued with the approval of the Virginia bare Business Center Master Plan. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS In order to approve a comma-cial development project, the Planning Commission shall make the fL.lowing findings: 1. The project 'is• consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. 2. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 3. The proposed use is in compl ance '"th each of the applicable provisions of the Developm,,..y Code. 4. The proposed use together with the conditions applicable thereto will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, c< -71fare or materially Injurious to properties or improvemt—ts in the vicinity. 5. This project will not create adverse impact on the environment. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning 'Commission consider all material and input regarding this project. Should the Planning Commission determine that there are adequate parking spaces for the entire business center and concurs with the findings, approval of 4.? Development Review 85-43 would be in order. A resoiution of approval with conditions has been prepared for your review. However, the Planning Commission may, in consideration-of the pending appeal, continue this item until Council has taken action on the appeal. Res ectfully submitted :Brad Buller City Planner BB•NF•ns , f PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 85-43 Christeson Company January 8, 1986 Page 4 Attachments: Resolution No. 85-112 for Development Review 85-22 Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Virginia Dare Business. Center Master Plan Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" Elevations Initial Study, Part II Resolution of Approval with Conditions �-y RESOLUTION NO. 85-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 85-22 LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AND FOOTHILL IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 12th day of June, 1985, a complete application was filed by Edwards Cinema for design review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of July, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. follows: NOW, THERFFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: . That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Flan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is iocated; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or imp!.ovements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration was issued or; June 8, 1983. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 85-22 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Condition3: Design. Revi�w 1. Ail pertinent conditions of CUP 83-07, as contained in Resolution 83-79, shall apply. 2. Construction shall include a parking lot with minimum of ass - parking spaces within,300 feet. 'Agb' 3.FUnderthe current=-shared parking ougept, the construction of structures adjacent to theeater, insofar as the same e more han 85 parking spaces, shall be deferred until specifically approved by a modification to the Conditional Use Permit for the site. At the time any such office structure is proposed to be developed, the appli..-nt shall submit a'detailed parking analysis to determifW if there is adequate parking for 'all then operating and proposed uses. This study shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission. If a conflict exists between the theater and other uses, then the Planning Commission shall consider a modification to the applicable Conditional Use Permit to reduce the square footage of the unbuilt remaining office buildings in an amount commensurate with the parking overlay, limit the hours of operation of the cinema, or other appropriate means of assuring adequateparking.. This condition shall be incorporated in b, docums"It approved by the City Attorney to be recorded to provide Notice of Condition to prospective purchasers of the subject property prior to the issuance of a building permit for the cinema. 4. A textured treatment shall be used in the pedestrian walkway underneath the arbor that runs through the site, including across the parking lot. I 5. The arbL-s shall be planted with vines, and creeping varieties of vines or ivy shall be utilized against wall surfaces throughout the project reminiscent of the original winery. 6. Adequate lighting shall be provided on all sides of building for the safety and security of theater patrons. 7. Proper crowd control 'facilities and management shall be provided for waiting lines to ensure that theater patrons do not block access to adjacent buildings or conflict with vehicular circulation. 8. Grand openings and other special events, Such as movie pre-iieres, shall require review and approval of a Temporary Use., Permit by the Planning Division. Tr-sh enclosure/transformer location shall be modified to prc/ide access to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire 5 District. Engineering Division: 1. All pertinent conditions of PM 8303 shall be adhered to. 2. A lot line adjustment shall be recorded to eliminate the lot. line' between the two parcels containing the theater prior to { the issuance of building permits. BASE LINE ILIL�,.o . V t C2r�b t4�,+y xa a . ftdllit•�' '�� R rq Iz�l v � e.. ,A,.+.. j� -y unr �-��irw/ff�9-r � :(., h�K• �... �r Nnr`/qL j 7 'I J� ru: a I � 4� •I J L� �/c�rl7zl �y •�j ', 7M=—w i ti, �. ��•- .. a n,�� �.. .� 'J l` �' 'f N i�' to r'' •.'` it" •; 02 b w 27 ox z/.• E BC9i il•. 93 i. F.ap // r NBiI•u.MnI IN •N n O(n••4 A A t �_!�P�.:i:•ar��i-�i-% ass L r� r:. L�",..i.��,.�� i i L6/I' ✓-f/.i AP/.f2-33' ( 'n M 1 E NO. V7Z5 i • !;` y ail r9 , �i; qp� MAP Y5 z �� n°O 8.. s. f 823� c �y ti a Lai NORTH AdIft CfrY OF ITEM- PA. '-45 qw RANCHO CLTLC,MONGA Tom; �S r PLANNING DIVEON EXHIBIT. • ScALE- y • _ , +t i ��iit ttni� T 4� l3ilJ� %I : TT ' IIIIrL•I.I •t^ Fooneu.Bra NORTH I CITY OF R kNCHO CTTCAMOTNGA ITFrbI: PLANNING DTVOON EXHIBM SCALE- IiI I I FI p E. F ' NORTH K,- CITY OF Tvt: r . RANCHO MCAMONGA TITLE: - g" LANNII\G DIVISIiN EXHYBIT SCALE.-- 2 0Z �2F5. 1��5• Ire emw /ZZ/ It,.G2fS�� I h�a• 95 � h •h �722.33 ke�%� os\r tom: l 1�2 QV 1 19'3�E s' s �r�1ti 11 F , G;5.�11� ° Z Me 5/T \titi�9 1 �2 BB/IG. ---12/ GJf2lB� l fL..I IN FOR/'iPEC E GP40/N6.//9P09C/iPE /z yOt �C CONSlP!/C7% STEPS LV Sl ry � /yiTH/N TH/S ,eBA �.'� ,BU11191 'SE r TifL,LA,11a.5 w n1 qr' 01 o T 7oc N<. �u SID- A-YVgo NORTH CITY OF ITEi*vl _ R ''NCHJ CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVLSIOi'`1 EXI-iMrr--_ _SCALE:_.,, J 10 s o� I 1 q �::• a� �� p4 OQ p� a'BiBA 9Q v �°b A o� C � ama�go_om @ O Q G•.a6r i - .-�.+�v Sri _+ = •_ice TIM-IN Rams 4cTM C!ti/S1�rM ` .�i-r 'AMU, OMMAM NORTH f CITY OF ITEND RANCHO CUC'AMONGA 'riTr�: � �� Z� PLANNING DIVIS�,W EXHmrr: a- CITY PF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART I1 - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAr. CHEMIST DATE• APP71CANT: LS r�Ii� Ce FILING DATE: LOG NUMBER: i}nEl�Pr7rt� coA? it jS ' PROJECT TiJO SroQY +/CF/ �du —FQL11G 9cm•4•L!w16 2/Lr?.1Z'�Sc4.�C PROJECT LOCATION: I. E"NIRO`:�NTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached s'sieets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soilg and G�v'• Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions os, in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions_ displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? Z. _Chan'e in topography or ground surface �•C contour intervals? >^ d. he destruction, covering or modification V of any unique geologic or physical features? / e• Any Potential increase in wind or watar erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or r'—%perty to geologic hazards such as earthqu_as, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or•similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and/or use of any mineral resource? 2. H drolo,X, ;Bill the proposal have significant r' results -13 Page ? YES MIME \D a. Changes in currents, or the course of direct of flowing.streams, rivers, ion channels? or ephemeral stream b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, rr the rate and amount of surface water 'runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? AZ d. Change in the amount of surface water in anv body of water? J, e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration.of surface water quality? f Alteration of groundwater characteristics? f g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with— drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water ether-- wise available for public water supplies? / i. Exposure of people or property to water ,G related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant 5C results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? i Stationary sources? _ b. Deterioration of ambient air qus7.ity and/or Interference with the actainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results AWL a• Chang in the characteristics of species, inc.7+_-fling diversity, distributior., or number of any species of plans? / N,. _V Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare r or endangered species of plants? S1Ll Page 3 YES MAYBE NO c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of Plants inro an area?- d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal•have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals: b, Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _ c. Introduction of new or disruptive, species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of ' the human population of an area? b• .all the proposal affect existing housing, or I create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio-Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional socio-economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values?' ._ b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, / tax payers or projec,: users? 7. Land Use e_and Planzine Consideration^, Will the proposal hale sign_ficant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or / planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? V-11 C. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of axisting consumptive or non-consumptive recreational opportunities? `J S � S Page 4 YES .AY9E NO 8. ,Transportation. Will the props^.al have significant results in• a. Generaton of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand fo- new street construction? C. Effects on existing Parking facilities, or ^ demand for new parking? _ \// d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present p?tterns of circula- tion or movement of paople and/or goods? V f. Alterations to or effe::ts on present and Potential water-borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? 8• Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal : .ve v signif t�t results in: `I a. A disturbance to the it egrity or archaeological; paleontologica,,, and/or historical resources? 10. Health. Safety, and Nuisance Factor,. W,11 the proposal have significant results i a a. Creation of any health hw.rd or potential health hazard? _ b. Exposure of people to potent al health hazards? , C. A risk of explosion or release! of hazardoRxs substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals _ or species of vector or pathenogenic. orgartsms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous �- noise levels? ` g• The creation of objectionable odors? V/`/ h•' An increase in light or glare? J YES a4YBE 140 Page 5 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant result:,ea• � - ' a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? b. The cre.;rion of an aesthetically offensive site? y/ c. A conflict with the objective of designated or p;atential scenic ccrrldors? ✓ 12. Utilities and Public Se-vices. Will the proposal have a significant need i�r new systems, or alterations to the following: a. E; :ctric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? c Cammunil-_`lions systems? f d. Water supply? e. Was'Zawater facilities? AMI f. Flood control. str'cture s. g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? Police protection? J. Schools? k. rarks or other recreational facilities? V 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Gther governmental services? _� ✓ 13. Enerey and Scarce Res.,)urces. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of suba'tantial or excesSiVe fuel or eaergy? Jr b. Substantial increase in demand upon exiating / sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? V/ d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumpti,•n J of non-renewable fors of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? '1 7 Page S YES MAYBE NO e,. Substantial depletion uz any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. Mandator Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the notet5t al to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife populaCion to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal coamunitr, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered *1411r or animal or eliminate important Examples of the major periods rf California laistory or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage. of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-tern impact on the eriviroumei::c is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endura well into the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable! (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental affects of an individual project are considerable when v- in eanne_•_lon with the efifects of past prr ,'.s, and ;roloable future projects). f d. goes the project have environmental effects. �G which will cause substantial adverse effects an human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRON'.6T%PtL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above questions pi,- a x,zscu'ssiwn of proposed mitigation measures). r C Page 7 -.I. DETE&*4I�SATio�t Ost the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the ornposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significsat.effect in this case because the miti-gation measures described can en � attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLAR[1_WN WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project ave a si niiica eff t on the envirnment,, and an E:nIIRO.. .T `1PACT PZP .T i req_i ed. Prate aigaaturr! Title. f 1 _19 nx nfv my. a>L- � oosyoa u L d m e `oa E y 60 L VA« OY p EU 5O La Epp d C Lu.L CV o C im -L E of E 'OwN€ Y tE 2^T. ua u q. 29 EL V p E c goo, u U a > C fin. Caad y Z Od p�E c T Y ��y^ y 3 du a a p > E O E p€ C Q Y du p q C � NO EOM CO t ty pNrg: C L q C 0 10 O ^n c A C dv o� S Oda^ TY C q00 Ln6^� T dC EM q A 'Ty a i-2 ANT 6 .UC tJ>^n C C S V96 T E e6 pO V.NN a Zy Ay ^oCnLpO eCu�.'•.0 y E.Q^. U O _ Q �..L6 waYiA6m^ i.O^d. . Oa\ o ur op6 d v yq 4N�udS. COCA I-L 6.L Gt� N! • I I. `` I 1 I NI m ' c�Noo I..i c OE da Y yp U u T3'r W M O d CO NNC 6L' .c u p =dtto O V q O v q Y L y y O y p q C ? YNC N u =M. UEE. lei _ A C 6 = q q do E L U l y d We u E c ~ o b n.-a d Y q c E n dt Y d f d dL Is. A J . O O u sN E Z» O Gdx O G q g. 6�aN9 qYN CO awr q.On Zz c c a oo . 6y u�p �ONN 7"N^Op..U:Lp E. O � O2WH dYA. rpu E d E y q.p y A N C y p q C 2 O Ty V. O G N O O a O d L O N � aLdp. Eo i '"a o o� T�TL yt•n, i. 6L ro� E L Ln3 d qL�p y.NNI YTcd — )N V. T0: EO A C p 4 p O L N U L 2 rL •� N y d U N c .q O d O N —� I b 4_a M' Nn" qQ E> c d♦_b'.. � UwC r�0 I '.- q3o^ O GCC . r qE 20 OTic NN —U' a E y3f0- )'� qs.cE q "'Cpd O LNTO C�y�ad Ou Z! T= Ea yp.` c+} SGgy y0 d d N N O p Ed O L a p Si G.a tic qE Ld�d 26 ^cd.�y0 -MH p O2 w�. A uw v uT ^ ^{ �p u ¢.r M N d- r ti jiS b c aa2iOY Lu t" V 2^ p day CO=O. L N, L O 6 —CY' E 01.L y O p ON ZL 4Clg pw Y b E uL a. Ci n. C.Ep� N=N dA t ugdi yl N.y p+ 4 Mat NSW q I W UD• NL uO. Y _ a�amO e.T 4Hfx i—"'qO '. L ^LNy dq. p0 L F..d w«y NN t\�cf 6�l. qNu Oa r u 2a' O^9 LS _.off � u 0.44� �E,atoO pgFE pu r r OQ Y gETlr w u W cL c L Opb c yr Jq N > �Zr d C y y.0 OM`i^E CZN q V y CT E. Ly� �T EO N3 LCy ONNq '�.dp..t Oa d EE Y T4 y.N c O rLM E' O O 1L v .0 A O.t fi •r vt 6 h 2 N d Z.2 0 C O qd OWO O.au c T L y 0 d y ' L b e I. M L y V L L O. •� � O b O e (� bqN dO.N dO� q OO. �' pOe bT^ Tug aN Q7 6� c .q r1 N O aq aT -Z 5K e tb Ada 2e apc d.� N.oo Lc dL .n.N•- 2 E E.if G u 6N G W b q0y ;it! a�. b0 O Y q N y G b C b N 3 C Yy 'C rlq Lp 6 LN. - E.T.+y. yOQ�N�t 7f d C G64b Oc 00 p LV G d G O E. to nw'u C •L r5- � ^.pOt L 9 C �� d a+b a M do yPC� ��c b b \\\ H�vui rsw 6w.� Qn SNO 1- NZ QN V��01. PqN aq=es 4uo nN Ca BE .� '. L _ �' E 6•n q 6.0.y` y 0 0' L b EN �JL� y cgiy `natp. .Lod .,"0.3 'o o poic'y^ �^ O�Y L Oa C c ti O q V O G aj - Na NYO. c.c C r VN du QC 3C„y 6 aL+ L T L 2cIB - qa E�m d uy bW cu. �.� b�A. pgCa 'a % Y Gd 'off. 15 n. b e� n doo.c OE 66 'O u 76. n i00L 9 Y U Q u p p^ U Sd...0. . Ny u q q^Lp A = G � �C y �y �b V I N N L O ¢Nw.m d x;a Tp dp t� od aq rn a d C E.�Tr S pa 2.A - _ tJL E .0 d1 c_ E • E VT.� FFE � � QE 2�'. W-� u o tic yY pl J ¢Ed Yc O dC • np L E.U. ` A J rp d � p C O • FF oo qA d�EE C� I= yEY O Oa. Gt GL € c o =u �0 AEac o= a`u m dE;w Y9 Y6 Y.E. fQe O`V L'd V `F aaEG. �d u adi U2T pays .a. K N;oa yui r jai d Ey a� c -g Tm. SO nn a •u O n 4 d 42 T.n O .nopA 61 2LKNp �A IS-WWl G�6C4rN Oc p. ny _ N \.\OVI (II O ay Adh � S LL C �6 ti^� xpd0 OO E c EB «p d L u Y E Q p 3 V uOt ep lv udr"' pN .-.a Yp E d E� Mr Aqo 9 .p. a1 ^ ?6Ya Ly px ^yV E O O E« LOp T. O � VOA JE d n ^Q taJ.^ vTrn C 4.y aLLA A.e C C Ex p nq -Z S ip O• u C O pOYy E 2 FF v T" ivx nr, N Ed ne E�N� 00 n O E C t Y e C O d c Cp d ,CEow NA 4Et ANtyp d p�4.L O OTa ' a L.dpE �. Y6.T L� COrn >,U 20 Ox�E d da rn E wt pG++n = np ed Eo 6Lt EnY. _ E A p a AC O.o d. OrnC O didi .-. O Md.Y E O M. C� p L.. rnu Eye &. p.-O. d :O u u A L nx d O GL ��EnEo H 4•D Y N h.a ..^ 3�^ UWK WES 6dYV edw c ZEu L �v C e O c V E L p W a N e E ^y d A e to m IZ O 6r T T e 9 ev d 0A E Ly A L y 6 U A vs ar So a c L q y d L^.t .L. o o a. ao+ qaSo w�W p E COI- . cL TO . E WCdEI EA eC L L Ear up D1d u� < `o f vAed >oa 'e. O u-'-iE d plc rn E O c. .-. c.r t �� c .LO.au <O YO O1A = � T�u qt O yl 2^ I' CS° L..a. LuE ud ML o d w o.r I?L c a Ls O O W J I O qm a cla .n c d . d ` X a v L seJ.;�_ s T rn v� e L d-o .E ale cM=� e....m•-� y L.d O•q c d c♦lam X. nr '. C^ Od O Tq. _ r �m OIL n Th T d 0 EeVT ti� M W G u M «n 4 y Nu 7L u M nU q O 6 j • L. C o O.C L e L L cp-- E upn i oL �oAa •• v. d Anna ci"ep d. "c _ o c n e'-o i u a o o od ea: �Ld AO _E a Vip T r� o T arc C O.L... dp' L....A w N E p a U d E 1 W N n d 9> O a,AAML Fulno <. 1� ..N Wq q..aY LA N09N+. 6SAC06'rE�L % d A n oupi WNV 'W l*C! 7 -a� Ny�r G1 L • •o • d OOadt d t O oA rn L t d - • m•'�i sTi i m T •� L. N � i y T ZM `-= a T alO�w•= of Y`T Y C ¢9.� 9 4 � 2 q� c 1 dTE aG yT a .�..� —•, C p q E E 6 C �. C A v p C V y M � ti 6N Cn L6 O� d U G qi 6i N fl S O .. •. TY�. •'P C E. U UL� V O c dp d tf.l W d L 9 rn a .� yi 2.xV C iy .` �� O a E.a �... G d q0 CL E. Y O. E O L E Y L E C q 0 V L d. T V O V O i•O 2.. �' L TDB V d a E O q �p• % U Q q a T� fi Y SN ` Z — — a "" N 6Wr7.- 46v�•+ NO•.•� N ��,� QV 6 ••.N iV 3\ V9. ¢ ••O. u H n v v p E9 'til L N o1 M �t Ty 9d � —o Y phi N �V e p O i L _L rna ra • L V .r N L � L yL.E ^p Ma A^ •J y p A.t 9Y. mod. U— Ct E U.w L. •�O Nd t[ p Y� Oi u 9. 2 6y ` S.b U c x � NY 'J • N. YEE GL p d. �c sn L.aO o ea vis e. a aq� L.�4• uA • � L O 4, v N�c m2o E_ d ♦E EN L.: ELp — � N.+ 6A 4.vL wi. v�v tpi q�.t..n¢ �.i ur 4 .0 E aNGt rC• u N w1 ? " Q• YI •L+ LLU-1i � z _ S as ii s n �'u La. q ou N �x a u: E c y zv; NC p OCl r`E N �y� Z m .^-.d. q y> E .g.9 U C� N.v •n r W a gd �' "'a D d. o `ov d au NL iiq C O a�E YL LC NN u a' �- •rn yu T.Vtl 4� O ♦+ uE �a^a i • E ^` �d OaT 9 4 • SU E.qE C t A n� CC qFu Y N o v c d one n.N� �.o�(\a oo o� o^in a•�.'n .52 an. 9 1 iquoa 17T O I I I O u 22 2q D x a\; O du V G uy D e Y LL d❑. Y x z Y 2 gv�'D A c d. aeg O su LL a ALN ^ qV q G • T q0 V L Y V a q O. �. N� CHy e 0� dL Fed p 9N•diq u L ZE d a C L u n Y MA O� of aEVI Odt s O � L La V V ClN E Ny LL li d m ^ O . 'z "•o m vE€ _ D q �t v ^ 171 111 LLI N. a6 dE u`v q �9 Wit. DCf L� L d♦! S. d... l l dpp C D d LL G- 1�9 !-Y•u <GN. 4u'i JS� O uu 2.- ICY <++. <.;. d �"�Zb RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 85-4 FOR AN OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED IN THE NORTHWES' QUADRANT OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN AVEN14'E 'IN 'rHE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 21st day of November, 1985, a complete application war, filed by Christeson Company ,-or review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of January, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissiorr, held a meeting to consider the above-described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rar'acho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord Uith the objective of the Development Cade and the ,purposes of the district in which the site is located; and _ 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development CodE; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will nut create adverse impacts or, the environment znd that a Negative Declaration was issued on June 8, 1983 for the Master Plan, CUP 11", 07. SECTIOti 3: That Development R:view Mo. 35-43 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. All pertinent conditions of CUP 83-07, as contained in s Resulutio- 83-;9, shall apply. 2. The approval of this project, DR 85-43, shall he null and void if the City Council upholds the appeal and/or amends the conditions of approval for Resolution 85-112. k Resolution No. DR 85-43 - Christeson Company January 8, 1986 Page 2 3. A texturized pedestrian connection s<iail be provided to the Del Taco Restaurant to the satisfactior, of the City Planner. 4- A texturized pedestrian walkway shall be provided to connect to the northerly project -- the Deer Creek Shopping Center. The developers of both projects shall coordinate the location of th'.s pedestrian walkway. Details shall be ir:!luded in the Landscape Plans to be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. If a fence is to be built along the northern property boundary it shall be coordinated with the northerly developer and shall be of wrought iron material. Details shall be included in the Landscape Plan to be submitted for Plannirg. Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 6. The arbors shall be Warted with vines. Further, creeping varieties of vines or ivy shall be planted against walled surfaces throughout the project, reminiscent of the original winery. 7. Minimum 5-gallon size trees shall be ,..•ovided in planters along east and north elevations to the satisfaction of the City Planner. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of January, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSMNERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: -- CITY OF RANCHO C'QCriMONG.; cvCAA1NO STAFF REPORT0 O p U )> DATE:. January 8, 1986 1977 TO: Cha-rman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dar Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REVIEW 85-84 - VINEYARD NAT;H'M!m, RANK A E consistency determination between th i 1_Corridor Interim Policies and the proposed expansion of an existing bank building located at 9590 Foothill, formerly occupied by Wilmington Savings and Loan. I. GENERAL: Vineyard. National Bank desires to expand the former Wilmington Savings end Loan building at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Klusman Avenue. This property is currently zoned General Commercial as are the adjacent properties to the east, west and north. Pursuan•c to the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies, the Plannir•i Commission Is required to conduct a preliminary review for consistency with the Interim Policies. The intent of this process .is to provide direction to the applicant early on to avoid undue time delays or financial commitments. II. ANALYSIS: The Planning Commission approved a two-story office ub- idins it the rear portion of the site on November 12, 1980, which subsequently expi�­ed in 1981, as shown on the attached Exhibit 91'. Vineyard National Rank is presently located in temporary facilities on the southwest corner of Foothill and Vineyard. Per the attached letter, Vineyard National Bank desires io remodel the existing Wilmington Savings and Loan building for two reasons:. (1) to provide a permanent facility, And (2) to provid'-p significantly expanded space to accommodate their patron,. The proposal is to construct a two-story addition on the east side of '.he existing building and develop the entire rear portion of the site as parki.ig. The key issues for the Planning Csmmissicn's consideration are: land use, master plannic. , and compatibility. The project would be a Continuation of the former finan+.,i-1 land, use and is permitted within the General Commercial Distkict. The surrounding land uses are a mixture of Commercial, institutional, utility, and residential use, as shown on the attached site utilization plate (Exhibit "B"). Therefore, the primary issue is master planning ,F this parcel in relation to the future development of surround:ao properties. its she Cnmmis,ion will reccall, the area between s`- ' ITIM K / PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PR 85-84 - Vineyard National Bank January 8, 1986 Page 2 Vellman and KlusmHn and between Foothill and San Bernardino Road was the subl,_y of considerable discussion during review of a proposed apartment project (DR 85-07 - Barmakian). However, the proposed site is primarily surrounded by fully developed properties and is not subject to the same development issues as the apartment p,-oject. The expansion would reestablish the baking use of the property, stimulate development in the neighbarhood, and generally upgrade the appearance of this site consistent with the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies. The size and shape of the Wilmington 5�a_v_i_ngs �ronerty in relation to qrrcund'nq properties and development is such that it-7ca-F be developed to work with the existing Wendy s deve opm, to the west and provide adequate flexibility , the vacant parcei to the north. Conversely, it is highly unlikely that a large shopping center would be developed on this block between Foothill and San Bernardino Road and Klusman and the apartment site. If one was to develop it is not uncommon to Place a Financial Institution on the corner. The applicant has expressed their commitment to developirn the site in full compliance with the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies, particularly with regard to architectural style and landscaping. The applicant is seeking Planning Commission determination of consistency in order to proceed with the design phase and subsequent formal application to the City for design approva". III. RECOMMENDATION: It ".s re^ammended that the Planning Commission eta ermin that the prcoosed expansion is consis}-nt with tea goals and policies cf the Foothill Corridor and allow the applicant to proceed with formal design review application. Respectfully submittea, Br ! Buller ' 4'«fty Planner BB:OC.ns Attachmepts: Exhibit "A" Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - -`ite Utilization Map Exhibit "C' Zoning Map Exhibit "D" - Previcusly Approv-!d Site 'Plan VW - S f%O,Vol N URTH CITY OF s ITlaM: RANCHO C U'CAMOTN'OA TITLE: N PI.ANNII\U DIVI,SIaN EXHIt3IT._ r SCALE._/ � J B:RNAROINO F cts cw CC � rya 51 ra- NJ AS KYII.�.lt KrQ Y� � J 1 � I! s.•' _ .<1 M.l 16 13 O 1 �11 .0ACWP_ COMMA. 1 i ` O n . ?C3 s•� Y f..s MA FOOTHILL NURTH I CITY OF ITG14: 's ; tTCO CLTCAMONTGA TITLED PLANNING DIVISICXN EXHIBITz. E -• G 3 - o «.o , T else`- 1 --{t L t •.. Wsl ;fie e j � � .. 9 VACAN: 1 i &MILE-HOME.•P \RK• 1 ®• I I a^ NUP#FIY o Ole.I 0, vim' ore.te.le�a •fVH�CpC� b p�loto.a 4`�.0 0 ¢ @ I e 1 w • � • • - � cK.IOR wl1 rorM tj •r � � : � -I Iry . VACANT F lit j i NORTH' CITY OF RANCHO C[JCAMo-,\TGA TITLEt PLANN[Nr, DIVISIaN EXHIBIT-_ SCALE- dJ I. i VIP +JI' ~P. 'PROroslD 2 STtlRr g oee nyi�atnc a a F � excareno S&L FOOTH"BLVD. off Xmep ile/Z- xpl //-r z -frr NORTH CITY Or ITG�bi: k RANCHO C T r Ct�MU\GA TrrLrj. s PLANNINNU DIVISION EXTHIBIT- SCALE:. . �, s .T �+►.. '" `F yt rd.�`SAE � s, L �� 1 3 ,t ,• � .. yeti �• �' t i 331�' rY\r... Grp' (`r �` ss z •".: , ss t,�',i��Vt.•� N• "F`� IF � �' t a tQ - �+-��'i ;a.�, a .:r- � 'a'��,•L��+� . i ,a rL�•► 'a'r �.�, -:i�:��;t EYi -T.�" � 't R. t.,el�.x yt.1 04',• -aY... r � , � r . a . Cl Ty G VINEYARD an 9DT�* `National`Ban Ott 1�' S G(C�i�a�IQ1t1,U^CEVEHJJ�S j BACH - 'Pfes n 1 C 1 x�eu Ave Officer ulunuar'y 2, 1986 Mr. Daniel Coleman Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 RE: Property located at 9590 Foothill Blvd., Rancho Cucamonga, (Former Wilmington Building) Dear Mr. Coleman: With reference to our recent meeting, you will find outlined in this letter, our request to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for approval to complete a major addition to the existing building located at the above captioned address. C The present facility is approximately 4800 sq. ft., located on 1.43 acres of lard. It is our-intent to add an additional 6500 to 7500 sq. ft. to the existing structure. We also plan to increase the present drive-in teller lanes from two to four. The completed addition would result in a two-story fi- nancial complex that will becone Vineyard National Bank's main headquarters. There is ample land to accomodate the required parking spaces which will be to the rear of the building and, new landscaping would surround the entire project and, would be in design with the city's plan. We realize that architectural renderings are not being submit- ted with our request at this time. Therefore, we are requesting your approval to modify the existing building into a two-story structure. Our present location on Vineyard Avenue is to be vacated, and + the existing modular facility i 9y will be moved to another city. Thank you for your time and anticipated cooperation. Very truly yours, • P.O,BOX 727.•:8158 VINEYARD AVENUE•RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CALIFORNIA 91730 a(714)9BMI77 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Cq3Cnnfo STAFF REPORT e t '- 0 0 F z U > DATE: January 8, 1986 1977 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-28 - HAVEN AVENUE FOOD COURT- The development of a one.-story retail/restaurant t10,000 square foot) building located within the Virginia Dare Business Center at the northwest corner of Foothill and Haven on about 13 acres in the General Commercial (GC) District APN 1077-401-027 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the precise plan and elevations. AWL B. Existing Land Use: Re-developed winery C. Surrounding Land Use and Zonino: North - Vacant; Industrial Park South - Vacant; Office Professional East Vacant; Community Commercial West Vacant; General Commercial D. Site Characteristics: The subject site slopes in a southerly direction at 2 grad! . Currently, the first phase of the business park is under construction including street improvements to Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. The historic landmark grape crusher building will be preserved. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to -build a one-story retail/restaurant building consisting of 10,000 square .feet., The building will have a "L shape configuration with a inner courtyard and arcade featuring a special landscaped center area, planters/raised seating,' tables and chairs, and overhead trellis work. (Exhibit "E"). The project proposal meets the parking requirement with provisions for 88 on-site parking stalls. (85 stalls are required per the Development Code.) Val ITEM L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REF''.<RT Development Review 85-28 January 8, 1986 Page #2 WF B. Design Review Committee: The Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the design elevations subject to texturized pedestrian connection under the arbor and across the parkiniq lot; outdoor seating/eating furniture (i.e., tables,' ` chairs,; and special landscaping treatment alongthe south and west elevations. In addition, the Committee recommended upgrading the south elevation by centering the reveals and by flanking with conical trees and enhance the west elevation by popping-out the Food Court entrance 12" (see Exhibit D-2). In , addressing the Committee's concerns, the applicant responded by making all the recommended changes to the development proposal (see Exhibit D-2). C. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Commission issued a negative declaration for the Virginia Dare project on June,8, 1983. Based upon completion of the Initial Study, Part II, the project will not pose any adverse environmental impacts and is consistent with prior environmental determination made by the Commission regarding this site. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Development Code and General Plan. The project will not cause detrimenu to AWL adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. The proposed site plan' design, together with the recommended conditions, is in compliance with the applicable conditions of the Development Code._ IV. RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission can support the Facts for Findings, then adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:HF:cv Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Revised Master Plan Exhibit "C" - Revised Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations Exhibit "E" Site Plan Blow-up Initial Study, Part II �.-a aon '•+ x ft lar �� '_ w z y I. � ] xOBEpU3 C7• Im �o� �� �wa-_< !� s .Cn ya ,sco bms.a a it t nt a. BASE AV m] •g u.m 'sT � � �rae a:� F we.m T- IPC .s 4wG5 W SI •'• L S�Bcnt � w •,foPo St.t� vcovc a.o..nc . .. =ln. CCU r a.ce. w,m 700THILL I••.tbe i - I � � F` g�•Y�"'�ARROW .ofoo- r a� ROUTE s I.aae t W t55 imf.i CG/4f t Iw. `Y. Ya za • _ n m B' $ ,,,P j • L A .. _ lid i I ' NrjRTH CITY QI tTEl�t: e �:►- 2 g- �MO CUCI 1l..NG TtTL;T 'dam dilr9 PLANNING D'1VISI0N EXHIBIT: `-L-, ,C 3- 1 I1.5111YllilLYlliii1 I I..O'. III TUB ' • �/ ?F.>:. — III ' tI )C' �..� ./ _ ,. �-- r `^•. ��.,� o«.:i �. s1 Alls i1.IV �..ItII,JI_j� _ I1.1• u nn N' a I ti � � �:. ::.,� :.: a •� ::sue.„ "..�.,—�_.r��..�.....�....` , III li: '"I lilt 61M FLA,\, AWWM 15Y NURTH CITY OF ITEM: R-A-NCHO CUCAMO NTGA TITLE:-�. ✓Itf 5 T 1�' PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT:--j.—__sCALc — r � dab Wig- bit'a4� as hu doa,� � 040 t: a �R a t,r. e91 � o as ��••?�:�ti: � ���� v �c dg•°"'--`r,�'.ea 'z.^`d, ?_'_z�;{lv' uoo aka c i . =aon r ' s s • i �/� �tV+[i�v7�P��ni;�1' 1 tlllllF .�� ��II4 •r �� r a' 1-111111{151 } 1 t 1 .z� �716JP7 r NI6a IINI �c,�a m+IN,ER7`�};ec�w �' a - - 1 � v r{ tY H _ 1 t g a a S • r t � Z-) 1 1N''ORTH CITY OF "` RA1tCT-IO CLTCA.IVIO ,'GA TITLE- [o ru-u s' PLA MING DIVISION F-Xt iII3CT: "E•• SCA[. = RESU 'JTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 85-28 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN, NORTH OF KOTHILL IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS', on the 3rd day of Novem,)er, 1985, a complete application was filed by Larry Tieman for review of the ,hcve-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of January, 1986, the `2ancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above (' €::ribed project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be mLt: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the Ge%.eral Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That th- proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and ' 4. That the proposed use, togethe- %with the conditions applicable thereto, will n;,t be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: Than this project will not create adverse impacts on the (anvironment and that a Negative Declaration was issued on June, 8, 1983. SECTION 3: That Development Feview No. 85-28 is approved subject to the followm—g c�itions and attached Standard Conditions: Design Review 1. All pertinent conditions of CUP 83-07 as contained in Resolution 83- 79 shall apply. AL 2. All signs shall conform to the Uniform Sign Program for the Viginia Dare. Center. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Page #2 3. A textured paving treatment trr, match other walkway within to project shall be provided for the pedestrian connection under the arbor and across the parking lot to,the south. 4. Outdoor seating/eating furniture (i.e., tables chairs), shall be provided subject to review by the City Planner, prior to issuance of building permits. t` 5. The reveals on the south elevation shall be centered and flanked by r specimen-size trees (24" box) (Exhibit D-2), subject to rr:view by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. f 6. The west elevation shall be upgraded by increasi:;g the projectinn of the Food Court entrance 12". 7. Special landscape treatment shall be provided to enhance architecture and soften wall appearance along the south and west elevations for City Planner review and approval permits. prior to issuance of building APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8T4 DAY OF JANUARY, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM04GA BY Agh • Dennis L. Stout, Chairman 4: ATTEST: h-Y Brad Buller, Deputy Secrefary I, Brad Buller, deputy Sec -_ •ry of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly- and i regularly introduced, pa-sed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of January, 1985, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 Y ao . NOWe0 tOi«1cd d G.ad. ou n= .wsi G d W y GO W p l y N N d 0 L w O.Y pl q A V q.G c y r � q t d n�� L q �e aq� L�np B O.dw E YO G6 C' a Hr 1ed UQp C tl. 3w Y. 6 e�y _Q I:rdU Jn='� O+C ✓N:d Ui.t Dl� +�..pOO Agppd_C n�)aG r.M �Ca At cVO O duu nG.L dO dq6 d �G 9 .py>W.Gnu+�N LL C'G 2LW Eb�''w S.�.• �: YS,O LM.d ppdA AC6aCCW +NT dLON CGU G�y�q E� of 4 g W d E G LL u a d. w.p O QN N.L Nwqq.u, wNG a yd. N G d O n E.2 O..•+E�.n dd^a. Gay 1pd0 AG a �Gpo S LdG^ L ..�.+. p a+ >> ld yo n.dz J f L .. a .d qn> E.na uW. oc emw G Uq yW OW i1i tVAO O � �E Wry O CC Gy.Y L.0�. U NNG LOLp > dGd aCC6Q� 3:1 OB .don a q a O.N3 dG+a S.+.O G Wdwa� Y'6.. N NLUd OM�-a GUNdV aD <N wws s'o nm' Fp.c ni>ia m N ' f� _= daqwDD j. yg Y L.> 6Ln E-a g H o�.u.GA�m>a 3 LO L d aY gE�N20Yu 7+ W P L Iz N sdq V A �y wt yu A O LL N e N G E. d A C L E� VI i d �: c J n L a ^a c uaTgw p�..� w0 uNi q.Ld O yYy Y S E n ODUa O�CWO Cy-� J 00�. O q 4C GW ddu n.^Y S n. L NYLN.w.,a.VEdw� NAME ti w�. OOaa qq V yy-- JpGp. � ti � I • y ^�Ya �C.�v 1. OI CI:\w�1 w Lr CI l�9 Yv YY.. o' EYb. 01 -V «.G. new.a c>id^ PueGi ,,Y.,Ga t'� coN p c•^uo rc ' cE a r s o2 m«,t. �L p1•P.t¢.+v� j q'°L�'..a .Pi."A - b y o u c" a•^.•. (� CWNa kNEN R LLY0. O ~6h CN.N V Y NONN . Q �+ 0.Y u A Y G L'N A D H�V b Y V.C U G C«� 9 d�n 6 •�a d N >~O /� Y R L R..A N.w1 U CC<aa+•A+ N r 9. R a e ^Nr O ' NL ae VC+s' M 7^Y LAd TE^l.T�b 4LC L Z.CL9 y.0 ' � C«'••M T�^ L d 9•C L py . Gw.y TN L .+ L ✓ �L C2 V O.AO�^A � P.'�^NaW� NNn TiaN WL AWL O wtw ^ yy U u O N-?. V y„0.t u d Y C� Q Y^ deb w •C'$N N '+.L 4U 90Cp C.M G.N. �F�y �NwA WOOL�dN wYL CAL �� Rj,.+ yr 9 s' 9U-n a�.A • 'a.�q.a�y-d°'.- da« amq� q$N « i'nia a,�,; CL '. m6> a�ec:° .O.��a.•A.Y.a=N Y.L«eY��u "oy .� PY •-� OJ d 9 O' C Y •J w 1�N N nj. 9 N Je L 6. 9 R V Q C '4Yq y•�. Na.O YROI 6Nty Oi N C t 9. W O p= • Y �.F,L i 0 O>i....u O N N•.w «9 y. 4 T U F L {'9 .. O S.0 C C p •q^' �P q GI y 9 w r Y Q �O C F.d•y a N0 G O Y N N p Op yG.4:9 d. Y.i q�WCC Es y�C: q C! QLN Oar O\'^✓C NU G9'^ 4 ^N i�•.RN V=. a S!N p r q Y^u G T^O >W O d C N N G L G .? , b r~ q••. d L d it L W r: L c g N �C L R M.G'G Y9 G RgE0.P �j Y[1 O C.. P t -i b ^L N O N N M C Y C Y 0 0 4'.E«.6 fi N Y N•^ V I u N N L y i N N Y N 1 ' A C C C ? R d K 9 w C • u.91 y N C 9 O v .It bL. �tY C:C ^u� ppp •nC � Y O p�� � M L O«��a dT Q9 WORY '_''lk L1p.� >COt}+nYLN .0 �.� � V�r• Ta L•.O�^� Ft N w C N�aN ORE M� T F Kq4 lY..ti G �pj P.� O'^�A=O u Ny^ OdR �u E qN YQ 'eNEd Ud y ay N4 y tz, N�RGy OC^^' ItY"}O wTN Y ECE tgBi6 L• G -N q.R NYN► . ' OL C O GA. M^ YWE •N 609V Goa pCNL •V... O.•'f@ . p LP...". p^ upY uaW Y M^ y 1L^ L.p R^qr. VG Cp •"1TL 116. ^.4.N.0 V^ i0.•'Y. NC� Y� CL RCN t YN « 9ydM C6w AZ O. t GOLLY '^L E`d0 UO «V MAVO d~ :RO�u Yti� eats 'Va ui9 NNLn W. dt oyN y4.G.L^ yYQN S ,��jN 4 d A.LV >9. dY Sap6^O Na� �•� NLw~a q�G C C9 a N m 0 a N •G. 9 O.R A�.MO N R FM Oyu RLp. c L^r• ENO >YR .O� M4...O.L �EE Y r...L.ti SO dNNwu •..>Y 0.� C.R.,..UbO o{R. Y.N.CZ JN pUyu y A Ldy QC NY qC CSC .'••'V0. aR.G wy O. µ.C•.q>CCe y0.60 M>09 N Y9Y V�duUi ^t~ - _RGGgp Y�Gt OI�I�I 9M ^N.S• NWaC Nr^,Rd� y0.tp ^"w0 CN C^d•r C ?Yia•••,0.q 2-le C 6 C Y« '�� qa1 L2 �ppw rip N ... 4 Ou1OL u��aLd C. a as w a u L q. L ¢� =- •C s. d GW C.YN ON CO qd0 ^:A 9� YRd�H.awy: N oAa O,O RO ^^o Ya> L 9tt p9'Oq GCY A V cyE }OO Vim. GL Lis • 9L�01d CrY LLC N.O Olq C LL dL � J�U4LC'' OdO�..>M� Opj yOvd 6Y N L titer P,H G w•Y YUV r•.� R L'+>.O GY q.UL u n9.ai N u OL OR> 'K R 0.C p �•+N 6 h•C♦i Ct q 4�vdi y N R.9 1«d t C 6 F L C E d d d J d N Y U KU 90.Y RM 01^�. •:..y MGR r.cigKR • DOA CO L. ^ G O So. Jk!L AY +G-Y Ct C Lw Gud. oX ^ ^•' ui. �a c. a..°>?o vAp n" ,'E'°1c ^a t Ol 6 Y d' Gqp1. u q qd- O 0 aL^N GN y CN uO u O O.Nnn.uLi^ ^vpgL du A ..d oa .�c 1J u �i dd od bqb oL b:A '+m .+T o=roY P. o z 1°a • aL r-b^dya Y a iy Z ai - mu" w SgN� Na oda^,N a rd'•r i.., C) NypYN a v� d d=J u^ dq- dNurL+.gd.. aty G N�Ta V �b Qj LON NLI. CI �� 46 OG N!•.� �Y.O dd roG, L Olppd N aL vvdW yL Uzi A dd Aq NYN "n FqeE •'LPG + qG dG 3. ^LP Gly d .2G A EL AMW � M N 00 a2 d q Il G^ •pi .Q rnp Vd E9 0 d O „G-O tLL <..d Cy NE TOpN GYU �b pN LAY dp Nd dY Y roj• ��.�d d Pt 6 LL GOI A. d a%iNC L:L9071 pN O b Npp= G L~ • aTi•i d 4n N y .p q .,goo 'C N d M L 3 n Y A CiLd IL ^OL6�' A OY NyN- L Yd-S••. LNG Y.Y.N TAfW w d NL O 1G d Q�C n N� Dt t L AGLr. iUL N.G n d dd O ON Y. aA Ld. Y N D lu c A q•�€O.L G.PE G fi H a a. ^q V d qr A;Y.•A- P>T N N 6 N i 6 0 , I 8.2 LGd gGlb d0• r 1 N4!0.01 Olm C6 e�T i.•q�.^� `.- NY 6 6 C.^ r� �da N ro a• OG. 6 d ycCL C C .. nNq �N^ CN aGi NLYn Ay. AOT O:. 001dn O L t n u Q d a N O G C G d V Y Y N d Ga i ~ OI R N.co L. 4Nroq z LdG. 9y� qq d.N A dN. CGS �pT N q G d A O `D Y GN. Q«G Z Z EEN Y. Gym p b N YL 3C L T b qw- NA AL dOG a 6p6N d aAn2. N�6 Cq a d CG LC a UY t d.Y vp f c q A o, b pp n d Y G 4 C S G C« 8 C a O N N o TSa':N q n ps v TL qYL L O dY EdC G.A--1 U dN nd O d Om ^•LL bLpA N pEb qr. Y� _ V • G d Y AY C> r^, ALC D bd REF. d O • U � L b L t M O A O d q F y L L O N J Y y G� Ob 01 q O N y G A N Y na. t Y 014 E Nb m C m 4 CO nt' O.A CO. L �N CGS OI E Gi!^T•.Gy. py d Lc N C V `� � y.CV • O yO Yu • �.Y r y E^ u n rYr� dL ^� ^' gi.26 NpWd��y, m J 4 q N ► . 4 U 4 9 i •tl " S �'N EL D'.? 'L' •• qC.q G. OqV G��CJ C' f • wFc.9YU O V q�NLL M � (•� 6 O "p0. uLLUL Y l\ L^ E V 9 i c G �. c G '>• tL U 6�E • • L Y o d d u ••� 9.-. !¢E ;U per y 0.1 Y6E4C ^L•� i0 00 \iVa u�fi r• �V Oi d Y9Yy dN p i L v 0 2 Q y 2 .. � v 9 g N L V y N 0 ` L•� p2CC1 •_LL O •.•Y•.6tdf u. Lo o "gyp` b • u �G-u.F7 yr 9 N L E O.�G LL O j S N N.LL N q u C •fpJ'N Np 6a N"O W bd ^ •N q�G' 4.N GLN .0 by q d0 O4b aL C u...A W Z (� O O,O Y •'. t C.wqq C i y O t L A "4 y m ^L :d --A O N•T' G Nti 2 �� CO'U•Y Oq LL N: `••. •n N c Fd.q Tx 6 t o u N g =Ep CV9 dpNEO NO" J O EX= w Ol Y•,^U • ZLL C Ly QUO 9 > CdL. 6 q D)� d 4o •'•O� Lyp0. Y G.Y OG 71fJu qu.•n Td IVY j �q "YN C� N�L�N Cy O d T^OM 9MCIVLL. ?q. dq i Yg ? p Q LO 6 p O.•. u Y L O W"L "Y ` ^9 L •-•C6 NG'•. O.bdQY N f~¢�• p-C.b 09N�•- BT'Ou S` Nq^O1. .oC L 9 " uax F qS••W. O4 "j Yp6 E t �•ML yOg a. CL N b O C cOe^O >>^.sL N N... NCE pg w 'C N d UST. L Y JJ p d W Y L Cc RN BLOC 6 d A� L" OON 6 G.�11••. "O¢b. TY. 4 y� • A`^O G0U16. L...�CIO 6yi C � L"9 o AN0 y"j N.fip b C d0 u p " L^ Y n>d •N^TC O r. G N Y q = o ,,LL d T d A L• O d.r oVA l�IC 6u SVI�Nq It-q FYWd 6�6aLLVI d�gY.G N O.Y� \J \dd \d I ( \\y I W f S w �I q4C qiA 0.�• ��9 NO�O CO "LM 'G Ab OIN V. U 09d LCN 6p -O.0 ell-,ell-, D Nq D� �ME nO• •Y C • Vd y Cq LLL b9 O p U c 9 q U p ECC gWC S. N G d 0 • O•. C y N M9 Yy dN V V q M ,OY L •-•O 7 y u Q! A O.YT L NY 4CM p 4NM `NN 9� Npd �19E q dp Y r tLn� C ^o yL Vc sgCO� ^L be^ Q G WE NLLN A o E N NZ t O Ell a rq +�� O G yE T C" N, v Y d S1 O+p• N L O Y10 C pp 2 S.L d • Gd^'q @v q r U.y Gay L9 E l • i G N A. +q LE'C^u Vd d Z.5 u1 >S 4 OO c N G N L L G W U L r q C L N�Ob 6 CC NV U. 6 C T i G. wo. b ea2 dq^ GN � .YC. q.• OY 0O1 4- NdN OG aqL m=TU` L.K. EE N ^ p`OT> Y.b 6 L 9:E O n N. •NL O.G O. r�Q •.IwNpL Y A c TO.Aa Lb�U dN"AC rn4. MLM C. L NSO O O•�n. CI d q �. C G y Y N ^^ T'C nfi dC 0 u •_ •'N=LA O. N ="q^ b 0 "l yA O' Nw.pl d Y�9 OT9 S ..U..T�roo Nqq op d 6 wd.Y. c y - 9dM A 9 C CS9•�. 9 €. w gO6 O q .DSO • ..CAD Ol. q.Y Y•CM .A. l OIC LCEdY Y^ YOu Odic L•.�. W i l U b U^ V•d L C c g loo "C L.OJ H NO U" Yi u^i .•p. 3.�.. JygT q. Gyp 'L^ONN Y Eo E.•G..". L>&j _ - ; •C 0.6i OYN.•• U WLL Wfix 6.Y.Y p yoo a M lMy� nqC N Cam. La^ O. q qC 'V FF N q O v Y m 4110 N � L V.. q >• n 9 N \ Y.}U • Yap aJ = 93 C y LAWL 'm �O N F� Q `•� OY E w L u t ` Y N ap q 'p Ga0 T q O•C= LY g L D E VN VO _ L p� d L �a•-. LC q 2 ^y NNO V L In 6V- �R O..p�p ENS ay C C O O am V.,d �•'.a d. y,daFC �•�. a a a a T.� ..• M E a dE y �yo WO Y 6p 0•q+.9 �ay a� q. � NE LY p tq c pm�u•e a�dy ad ^ '�° �> a asL Naq aNG L NOC M M V d Y aF� �Np Ad+ G oUy� fi E 9G 4 N carN ^y 0 aA q^ "' uy�I.. co adW�. A ,_^ d Fg�a A'•' .qua . VI.LN Nu ..JN .O WYN Rv Y OI OI'^. d Y u _.d �N t Q Y+ .BUG a•O�pYOyE Y �c �q O d d L 0 d C. L F �.A N L V. >•. > a Y-C O q i a C C r p COI N V~ N p 9 O• q a C L 0 0 T nx C NN 6O V E W • U O.N�,C CO E R No qq V= 0..00.` W Y .wC.L yw d OI aqn m..r LLm'au aopuo a.q � } uA�N..qu^ Lc it ev.% No b U 9 L N u g y yp a b 0. L N C V O W tT9 o Q q C Y 6 L 6 Q U M L�•J Y W pm w J AOL Ca OC C aCu OT Otzt COei YW� Op mo M �.• Lt C~ bm L YOfO ' _CC O. E +a+T`M OC1hM UO y.E .e-. _o a. .. 6 a G ^' 4!r ^y Y�'O L i d 6 �q qc CE 3d. q CO L • q TNN. d d Qq C a a.-.:L L• • 'Q .O Cq a O a O O N y �O it tpl a� dQM �.it 6 O q OW.qY r a� L aY9t E 9pOp k as .Yr GO HT �q m9 G a Up p p9�9� a qW �N L L O 6 Y O V. p pp qN E•n �V. 6t0?q YiL Ll au ? t 9•a..«VC 6 O .NFL .O a yq•� �� Lw C^ CLaiG L ^r ~ 06 wL a >pYOa ^Y •^^ aU aw aM � • T h.L cc N YOi O p L A NTj O • NN N= aL �VVU A` da Yy 6 pNaa01 dYpM �.YO ao o .Y..v LC ng �. a cq NOY a +IF M... rn� N �Cw W. �. �.•. O C �O N ap C a d PL a.. UY � O •q La yq u E �^ �O dyy� �U a N NC 00.• OIN d y KO.a %m0 LCL+ t q� POd dd ..:q YEr'L a- WNV WUi.t �G U'�62 Q QO QGgY MO Q q � tJ 5 'o� t p �Oiia� d r I'V 0�4J u, p � 6 C C• N d W � r. O uF0 � V pVL.� Yr O A C < LY. Cd O j A O W M 4Ti ~ O N�d 6a+ ` L 4 L V .q ^ • E Nn6 U L•06U C tL d � � Y N nT. ya c Yw < N }/ •O. o'w°•�na oaA vy�a u.b o °:M m. �o i- u cY '." LQ n N� • �• �^q T Or�� 4u y� E J+ ^ d 1.YrC � � V >L< ^ V LLO A L Y L O Y C V ^Y L L D.r•LL,. Y•yd �� C LM�NM � MO � C Llu G d L C L q C ✓O N q q q W O Y 4 L Y L o y d Y OrL CK yu�^ NLd9 SP L9N L Ea Or.�. Y. d tN <aayd Eye lca' ci 'Z"zi- S— %d Q."oa�'i:p:, a GY a c O.a Op PL H • i Tamt EAN O Y O NyT.,g 6C q^W N� y40Y0< 9 Yq L. T Ndy� L d O Nl]^tt6f] EN Our LC t•d y4,da Nq OL i] c WR�.diO 64ia�� Nt6H NW LY 7�y 2N dG d d d ^ N.w-•� 6.pNM 1n OEM NV P.Y�� 6L1 R� %LN�4^ ^ yL O. d N M a _ 2 uoY< Y c 42 O:. aN < ..tip v ,, �L Y � n i 6 a T n.Y I) N N T EE pU yW N6 ^ r 60 M G MT � 4. 9L- N GO dq �d SY ,.E"- WF q t. CLO A d d d N >u CO ^V g,iN L N Y. N Y rr 6.A 6OL Wa IO. UNu�OC 4L UT+ W d aC. V 5 12. E _ 'a w A m Ord� •� C• Yt N • U w L A� q n� oZ+n ' l� Y O dN O Y NA f •�N N N � [AFxY .cU Cv O Ou 4.0 Y N L ► u 4J dAO H L aC L ~ A •O ,t O «d d�. r..pa Y '^Lu L CLu o •OiNi dq l6 V.+ y bn� O Ct. L.� La a' M Ny d'� wW 4 Ofi B N n6 L >` m d u 6^ pY y UC N . <f..d uU Yp dNUY G C OC N.V LY. qU uIT � C N? SON E WO A `G U L L L C C d L O O L U� CUQ HH �dVN oY SM C m ^i a 2 do L L A =o LC v j C< o3 �U. d C� q SN j �E h9 C CAq u • 69 Cq dgtM C d Y L o L 9.• d•O+ Y W �Y O� L 1"� a p m o. 0 a ... •' O O W O O Cu C u dY A Od ifY-ud L O O u p. EE d 0 d S YOOG O • O r„ A.64. COL 9d Ap V SY p-1 L n pbZ Eu du N� ap E=C.`. y L LI- 42Opp: may. G .r o� � dW dV p L UE, C L ND p L i ^ p M Y L� pn u'- A n U d Y ✓V plT d En pd �N A ^ L o L€ _ U L L u H. i a NC tJ aL z zs qd d o ap A� ca u L C AO i.d3 u A n A O • y 9 L U D 1p4 UA d UOd 9 p b1Ar uLw9. V{{11 �`fJ. 9 L1 LoC. ITV .Cn f...p� 4GN: 6a J2•C O rT^ Lt P. E2 C N� t