Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/02/26 - Agenda Packetnn/F fn-� k", f,;� nA rfx yy a `N�t*�t gt��'('•��'f' i .A 1 GL k,! C Rj _ :No' - z 3 �7 W"OF 13A fi A'CT1 -0, N � L Ple' �bmn comn Coma �. U r� 4,rp owed as ar ended dV.v PPTI IJ- Jenua V . QrlCii�tY ono r .it sho Rerraved for' discussion sR , A caved 4 -0 -1 iT},drow replanting istrequired; ► be done outside trail. VL P,ubM Wd iimits li . }�I{ ' 7 >4 J NN cc " flAY� abruary�2$; 18s 7-00 "Am. , i Al€K9,C!C&MMU VA613NWR 916M MAA �H ®tC WOO IAC:EiT% ORN "K 4 � N ♦ sonar l3 _• commissioner Reinpel ,leer Kon%- hides '$ °. cammi goner Stout,_ °' �i4lcEdire'E+f r, oivi�igcGorsent atendarrHems are�60 ,0ct�d to. .be routine ' Controversiat.,,They wi[d'be t1c�t�d or;'.by thra Cojnmbsion°at without dis�ussior Sfanyone hasconcernc ovar "any ite�ii, r ybe remoyer3 foidiscus�i•r. n ME SXTFr.SItlN FUH � vTaATIUE'TR9 Cx ' 26' 2 ,TENS A custortlot'�es�d p►taeldiott�o X27 lots on res�isnd� the Y �(5►ery I;o ResidEntiak 1) tiT ct, sated oa ,4tle outh sine oSummifAsfenu, erist"oi wanda, x J "K v*"'_— ih "a •saw.* ,� i : � .- Fa+^x*r.,. i.C'f - i.' s 714-; g+ a B Approved 4 -0 -1< B. i&iJkOhI'MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FARCEL_MAP 9180`- . LANDGO�FINANCIAI� '-,GO!R'PORATION - A drvi "satin of 6;42 aces o isr: into4 3 oaredls in tl°e`'Gene.el Inaun*riallP, Seeyd ��4 (Suberpa 2)z: located; south of 9th .�xceeand Hellman A�renue � -21* 40v ^l3 24 ;: (Continued from Janiary, 22, 3985 meeting): C Approved 4 I#DNM.ENTAL <:ASSESSiWE'NT AND TELNTA•'1',IYE TRACT` 124 0 R3ANCHO11P;AR& VILLAS ;The �derelopm "t.0 1,14, Smgle'gam lyrattached units:on 14 3, acres of -WATW AO -mow' Mid um Residential District (4 $ .di'Vild ;:,'located. at the r .. north west,ciorner ¢.6th.S'treetand':Iellman Avenue -APN ` D� A road 4 -0 -1 D. E&MIRONME -1 AI7 ASSESSMENT ANDFTENTATIYB TRACT Cordltlon modified to allow 1320:3- RQBERsfSOI�HONlES .- .M,ONTE'R'EaY',VILLAGE = A= A fal�exl;b! I i ty in use of 3' wall to re §idenUa> ?develope►ent consist.ng of� 224 condominium units setis:factlon of C.R. -fire alarms oii'10 3 iieres of lane int�he Medium Iiigh ResidentiaE� 5triet ZN tegis,ed on 3- story units. (:f4,-24,, du/ac)`),loeeted on'.the�nartt side.'of AroNt I.,ate, . ~" adjacent x9 the :eas06de�,of.Deer Creek Channel - APN 341-13 . , P E Continued to March 26th E.' ENV1RO� i- MENTAL •.ASSES3NtENT;ANTJ,FARCEL`MAP 9349- SMITH; A' 'vision „of'1�3 aerestof;lland�znto.2 phreels�in the` Very `Law. sident%al District (1 =2 du/ae` Located on• tk�e south side .of ^Strang�Lsne;. west °of ;Carnell'an Avenue = APN 1$01 271 =07 VIL New Business Approved 4 -0 -1 F. ENVIP.ONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT AND ' DEVELOPMENT T ask. enclosures moved to cent rat R£t`,6iBW 85-41-i rAV A prolr�al to`develop a 9,120 square 1 cation; 400 square foot employee foot'industcaaa burlaipg -.,on 1 D2 acres, of land,. tiiQ ' za `area location approved as southeast earner?of 6th street and Lucas Ranch' &R'oa`'d .in poposeo, special landscape Subarea 5 (General Industrial/Rail Served) -APN 210 =32 k05 'e`atment at corners of Lucas 00: ranch Rd E 6th St. prior to building permits;t c or band bask to ORC on G. DESIGN REVIEW F,OR TRACT 12830 QUAT�ION dlosig i onsent prior 'o building permits. Review Or':'Practxl?830, Wresidential sttbdivision'';of�w141"4 ` f acres ,in t'hd'Low t odium Residential Distrlc �4 "SkdWae)`Onto' ` G Continued to March 26th IOUlots located oMii west side of Beryl?,°treet, °no hog "v 'ak Bas'e'Line Rr ad a !iii M Approved Applicant's H. CONDITIOPTAL USEu PERMIT X85 26 WI .LIAit4� "DYsO '" (~ ,ro o_sa_1 4--0-1 Consideration o Lhe-, perimeter Wa11 troatmenON o a U nes,xo be pl,anted'on, alternate recroat�con�t ehicle,;storagWfii warehouswifacilite pa el s): of t`he decision of Des gn Iietnew Ccimmitte`e a =` , ' lk ` "'n ,� 1b s "k AO - — m _....F° r �' W, A _W}k tt 3 y yl 7 . . - AYJ.D1i1iiQ'C� y�tii febr 9 'Y'" i _l'. Consensus that none of the I { _, HLTi'd613Es�2 _'Af6m Su�CL�IC' 'd�13N:,CITX'OI r 41I A1JA x ternates were acce t,ble, *'cP a " Chin zsslon�°e F ew.'oz ltindoueatlater ativ?sforathe 1 P M directed to for,ua rd ': ssues � � r s. '1 a Speetfi"��v��ois Oft* �aeres �f�land thus the coivicern to Fontacit for C ty40 an�ep�oea ed�oathe arth side of SummitAvetlue, tiw i gat ion. east�of Sail SelalneGYreWst ofMDEgoee Freeway; C 3'9 I! 4fib C = uaent� 3 - r 7ii tFl ilk a end �laee' fgr�tn� i7enera�biiGf`b ddress the CbMrafflion ems to be��dis m3wa h, b, are %loswe ' ihtcl2 ado not �-a aireGd .' p earFon thsagahata ti S Ad,Ioil�nlut The F4avutl�rtg Comm�tss°onpp� ha`4Arcimint: tmrizve Reutlon� `` that s t„ an ag€�ap m4 adjournment: R'ra 3 If Ditamsgoy�U tywr s 4 time ttt�e haft be headili wit314tYsa consen of the Cmm n ll ; proved 4 -0 -1 J. S,tatusReo�rt onConce�.ttuat`,rra,Vr,'taar riesigny }' 1/` �` Planning Cl�rtxnission adDour','ned to .laFch 2Fath regolar { *eet no ' March ;12tha��e�,erti ng conceY � d tame -'a "b 61C, a �nilsst�an to atL nri' 1 ` P1in�I _g�fo5tinjssione�rs �n5t'i uteki Von � ' •a . ++-. a..,r'�,. 4 F�w�.. I a M; a y y..� ;j Al • � :�: r � a�"i Y q n '. x , krt '� 'Y . n -� • oft G 'C_a - A NP 'Ci�NNION( .✓.���. i ITS' QF� � ` �� t r. Q , IISSIrJ'� `'+I 1si E 77 i)A6AY R'ebrueil 7V6,1936 1 lLI0Id5`ARH�pC08IPdl1CY C$P]TEB z. _ Jl 'r -, RAI19, Iii GQIICAOfcONGA CALEPOANW, E: �_� .rte,, ✓ "`r ;. s L Pled ;e� of L1IL;e[eee rti 7, H IL ,HAII Cell p ° Comtmss bh10Baiytrr,_ Commissio der Hempel *, CommissionerC�trea al Commssioner.S, out Coh�t�t�ssioniPcNiei Itl. AW OIB fO inahtes Jandry V. Content CaleP i ¢ ��, '�The'fd1Wo ng „Consery1 Catensl�r items ar;e .expected tr7 be "rout`�ne aiad,non contr�cWOMI�2t�� �T�liey r �i�be ucO'd iti by the COO sto�n at one time tatth #fir disr,��ar« I' anyone hay4�^v ncerf o *7erdany�item;:. iE.'sisouid Ie :rysovel�r discussion: :, A. 'DIME .- TE•NSsPJPt F4#`b: TENTATIthE TRACT.126422 �ENSEN= ,r z` A ",e�astOm If �t res�r�ential subdivision o� 27 Iota <on�18348 . � f acres 'oi Iarir ( in the ,VI, �lfery Lwow Resbdentu�l).aistriet,. . ' r l�.iatod an thilj south siue'of Summ`zt Avenue; east of Eiwande A'Uenup - AP31; 225 -]i81 c12:8cr03� , 4d 4. L PWUOIH@SP�I�`b ta # , t N^ The ° fo1o��ang tE}erns are ~public 1heZrings cn Kwtiiciffx con`ce "id rndi�ldui hra3r �e Eheirrolimion;o� the relgEedprolec,., lease � J -, r ; a , k waEreco ed�ihe, Cha:rman�ars address tttla Comt;ssion „r� bystaEingjksErnme ands ddress A iisdc��4 opuaionsst� iii be a a y' ( • r lim i^ { ^f s tit” ;,, YiJ r ted t'61 S" t m mulaal for sachIpropvee 1G , r +r r �> d t al ! 4 ¢. ! Poi. '6� R��•._�x9. 3 ' D. E2IMMOliAtk 'AL AgUSSMENT AAIND PA" +MAP 91,80 ruANDC+� I?INIANOUAll COR'EQRrAfIION A diviston.of 6 �7. Q' acres+o n¢tint3%arceis' theGeneralxIndustriel/,Rrriil $erva%Di�sfr% (Suba�reay2 }, lac�tedsoufhof9thStrgQf' and" ' ( , U.. westoellman A�renue 1Al1PT 209 Q13 24 •'(Conmued fc��rii` ' JanuaGy22��1'986, �meeti L�;1 ti s s C. NLViROPTME1+tTAIi yA9 SM Nx A +STD TENT.AfiNrE <fi,RACT a 12420N AIAN HOaP al IISLAS , Thea deuelopment oJ�i 4: smglfacn,��'a t�aen�ii�iinits on`�`l�4 3a�aCr�s�Of��land�in�tfie�>;o�T • 1'tedi n mmd§ w."alstrict (4 $ u�ac), loca ea at =they � no ^tti vest 4 Ora N' �es of % &th 9tr eM1'and Hellman Auen�ter aAP X0818104, =05;�an06 j D. ,M IRON,1ViBidil ALaAcciESSN1 id A'ld!D. Ba1�iT�A�TNE TiRDe�iCT 132039 ROBEii:TS:ON QFIK)MES . 4lWONTERWYk YiL"LAGL A resaden `t�s#de�ue�iomnin3istsng2�` 4 ondomarfium�un%tst on iQ 3 a res of n"a an the M" a iumfiHigh Resid ntzaAN Ict. (1A W Ideat�e�nL ,norLhX�s�ae.,af�israw! Rouses adlacenti 3ci tIe•easak�iu'e'o €ai�eer Greek Channel 341 -1 "�, a brae n .+ df F. EN:Iity0�31MEYTALp sSESS`MENT :ARIIDtiPt�RGELMA'lp. 934 SEdlirvH " A�diviSlOR of "3�s espo ?Iand�into.2 pardp the 1/ery ;?Lowy Residenivid,'D stgtet t, 2P dulac) located;, cn�the 'side-,b f, Straii Lane;, vy st of:Gasneli& Av,e u 1�PN 106 -ti2i1 07;�€� •� • -• ' 1lld. Neer Baisaiisa , .` F. L' Ni(IRQNIMENTAZr.,- 4SESrS1V�ENT; _ANTI, >;EiIE�,OEMEiVL REVIEW585 -RiVII FA l,,nfAi�,Prbposal to'dev�elop'a�9;�120 yua�eN foot��in L�riB�� �bu2lding ono 'E 0? acres+ of Y�lan�l�'a"�lonb+�ti� soutfi'�astr}'coapn_er cof 6th 32reet snd: Lucas;�"Ranch°` Roa�d� xis � Subai+ea 5�(GeneralIiaus�ai/R,,�1 Served} :4PN 210�;F3�2 -S➢5 dt ; G. DBSIGN R�t'ri'�W� FCbR,�I'F�1CT 12830 CiTAI't'ION`- ,�Desi�n,, Review ° or , ZT,,r- t, '2830; -4 residential' subdivision :of 21 4 "i ? - acmes in t ��Loly Mediiim Res��3entiel Ihstrigfi, �4�S���aG) into. ° ' ! 1�3 plot located on the w,est� side ofs 8ersyStree , n thoi ry HBse 4LihRoBd Ht �CQNiiiT,YO �L, USE PZ3RMIT 85 26 ....aWILi"IA i'40 _ RIM thep'v "jwalt?eatmeri or , Ysy ecreataon vetiicie' ft s or`` g NIMC i rarehriUse sign acdi ,yW PPe� of t ie, eci ion o eiil"svie' omm itte at' rl�}� o IT . + ♦i{as r SJlre'LiJG/`�S Qg +t I it3�i,. +Ii;��R.�rJ'GFSP�CIF,I'�(. PLAN. GPP��O�F1F,O�i�1sANA < la ru5lgCo�hmission e�new o4CUSt� rsealt�snattP es othe�� t I �terla a Speci c tan o� a67�fi ores o n3 withut` e ,` xo F ntana, ocated on the °n rtlnszde o£ amm�t�tuenue, eS of Sari S vsaneCre ky wsto ��oce F e way This bus tie tim qnd :ace forstYie gOeral •pubheto addressthe y sue+ s �a � tf Comm pion. e s ve dcs� used hdre rarer hose]ii�ch donut a airwQy appe4. on this agenda y ; a ��1 r ros �Ill Is, ,4 y dins�Plannueg Commission has ddOD d AdminiQtra ve RegWation& tYtat se an. ffin ad) MM IL tome I) it;ms go�he n ditha�° 1 ime;�hey sha2l�t , earl only witi� the co�tsent o he Commission. r r , wei r,' 4 4 .9 j4• tT H� ' � f ✓ � ¢��nap..'.�p i3t.a. i tY t� � _ _ _ ljl•.� 1 .j 71; VII i r` .�.�.«.�.�....�.t4.s J��.�.�...��.�.f a ;�." . ��.m.�.�.....,,,,�,�""' `•.;.....«..�.." " °;r- •' f qgog ij � i"� ,'� *r�:•j �i""`'"'`,.+, U.h•� �i`Zk� ,� i; �: 8 a • �T a 4' � ^xu i n,,,: ltHAfFR t � :�3,`�3 -} �'S � fi-•X j$� I� +4 �'y - �' ... �. No n PAM s rn a: s lsm. . �.. ate,. 'w e � y y► r \ . i.'f+E� +`.+: "�55,� �: �`� ;Ai �Mom zoom AW i S 5 (.�� 1 ,. � t k ai k a in �` Ai b{w � �•kteet '� "��N u.t- -( ri L /OU p.( CITY NAL� + ?li �( Iij 3aR u F-M (t � � ..%% ,r .: y�i, j + •:..�� _ kid. V 4 ' CU6A ONOA GUASi! ^CCUUTY AEGIONAI /'Ai1' w 1Gy,ry R e �` w F a tp Q AR7Q 1 f IIMATIONA ,A Y `�„a ✓�#� �N°*R is � .> M.. -�q' r "aye .� � .. ^%` r k CITY OF RANCHO'cuCAMOMEA M� PLWING COMMISSION MINUTE. "> 1 Regular Meeting «. February 26, 1986 ' Chairrxm Dennis• Stunt called the `Regular, Meeting of the Citx of, Rancho Cucamonga Planning Cy mission` to order at 7:00 :p m. The m' eeting eras held at .; Lions Park Community . Center, ..16I _Base , Line,., 'Road, . Rancho -Cucamonga, California. Chairman Stout then led in stile pledge of allegiance,. - =7 ROL` CALL { COMMISSIONER::: PRESENT: David Barker, Suzanne Chi ti ea,, Herman Rempel, 'Dennis Stout 'i ` ABSENT: Larry Wiel ' STAFF PRESENT: Brad BUl c,;, City Planner; „Bruce Cook, Associate Planner; - y, Dan Colema,6, -Senior Plan.n - Howard Fields, <Assistant. = Planner ;'. Nancy ''Fong, Asse,ciitie Planner;' Barry': Hanson, ` Senior C.iav'i1 Engineer; Cua�t,0ghnston, Associate,;Planner; Barbara Krall, ; Assistant G,,np, Engineer ^; Otto ,Krdutfl senior "Planner; Dave Leo.sard;;� Fark Pro3ects Coordinator; ' James Mark6hi City Attorbiy ;; :John ,: Beyer, . Asti stant Planner; Janice.,REynolds,, Secretary AN "lOUNCEP@E:TS Brad Buller, City Planner, announced that staff has be�0'6 working on the plans for the Planning Commission tour and asked if, the Couission woui'd like to" conclude with a tour of Foothill Fire District. «e It was the concurrence of the Commission to add this item to the tour. �} J' APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Commissioner Chitiea requested an amendment to the January 22,,49$6. notes, page 9, 6th paragraph by adding "might be" acceptable, could `pons 1y "`" 6e compatible, and was "deeply" concerned., VU Motion: Moved by Banker, seconded by Ciifitiea;.u7animou'sly carried, to approver* the January 22, 1986'Minutes, as amended: A CONSENT CALENDAR A. TIME EXTENSION- FOP. TENTATIVE TRACT 12462 - JENSEN - A custom lot residential -subdivision'of 21 lots on 18. W acres `of nd in the VL ('very, Low Residential) District, `located on the °south 'si'de of Summit Avenue, east of -ttiwanda Avenue - „A ?N 225- 181 -02 & 03. Commissioner ' Chi ti ea reques,£ad discussion of Item A. ,.She was concerned with ' the replanting of the Eucalyptus windrow and requested clarification that the replanting would be done outside of the 'trail;, D a Coleman, Senior Planner, confirmed that the replanting would-be outside of . the equestrian trail -. Motion Moved by Chitiea, seconded, by Rempel, carried, to uibpt, the Consent Calendar. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, REMPEL, BARKER, STOJT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COOMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL carried PUBLIC HEARINGS R., 'EN "IRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND 'PARCEL . MAP 9180 - LANDCO FINANCIAL CORPORATI vi sl on of, 6. 7 acres of land . into parce I s °the General Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 2), located south of 9th x." Street. and west” of Hellman Avenue APN 209 - 01344. (Continued from January 22, 1986 meeting). Barbara Kral], Assistait Civil Engineer,:,- roviewed the staff report. , Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Ray Ferguson,' representing the applicant, concurred with the findings of the staff report, Resolution and conditions of approval. There were no further comments, therefore, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barber, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the ResolutiLp. approving Parcel Map 9180 as presented. Motion carried by the following vote: ,AYES: COMMISSIONER: REMPEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE r ,ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS:. MCNIEL - carried a Planning Commission *Mingtes -2- ; February 2�,i�8 3' j , � f � C. ENV1RONIENTAL ASSESSMENT.AND TENTATIVE, TRACT 12420 = RANCHO PARK VILLAS a c s ng e, family , ace s: an . ., acm. e u,d/ate) , Tnd, i n •'ahe Low Medium t Resi strut (1-6 �cat 111, he, a _ northwest corner .`b ^f Fith Street and'^ ^Hellman Avenue ',- APN 2p9 16I= 04,QS, �. ' and 06.1 ^ �a Howard Fields, AssUtant *Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened: the_ pub) c hearing. j) Paul Delalise, 34 1 4alle "rAliedo, Newport. Beach., repreeentin� the, appli -ant, concurred. with_the findings of ti•' staff i voti, Resolution and conditioRs&of . _ - - ...approval Mark Cysalino, 1354 Dd1' Rio Hay,t0i'tario,_ was concerned with f.,lood controJ on 3 Hellman Avenue. -He asked th&pr�ce range ofttiP 'units. z� ^- Mr. Delalilse repliAd that •the, ,price range is speculative at this point; but thought the units would be in the high ad0;000.range. a' ^ Barrye Hanson, Senior�Civii Engineer, addressed the .issue >of, €loodY gV on- Hellman. He explained that'Sthb project had.been'designed with high curbs and ` a low block -wall along the `Hellman property 1`i^ne, ` Chairman Stout pointed out that,- Hellman is one of =the Streets slated fg!^, imprn�ement under the City's Storm Drain 'taster Plan .which wgsul�etientual ty proviae--a storm drain in Hellman. - ,He. stated that the drainage study.fo"r this pro ect supported that this project• would not adversTai�y, ,,affect' =fisting dra;nage on Hellman. There w0eq no further comments, therefore the public, hearing'was closed. Commissioner Rempel commended the applll':ant for their cooperativeness during the Design Review process, He felt t�ta?, this devel opmeht will mproVe the existing flooding condition on Hel"hnan Av °- Ch.'rmain Stout agreed and further comienddd the applicant for taking,, the ' Design Review Committee's recommendations into.,consideratton. ^ Motion: Moved by,$empel, seconded by Chitiea, to issue aiNogative Deelaratiea and adopt- the Resolution, approving Environmental Assessment and Tentative r. Tract 12420, as presented:" Motion carried by the'followng vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, CHIATIEA, BARKER, STOUT ;= NOES; COMMISSIONERS. NONE n ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS KNIEL ' - carried : x n a� Y § t PTannir gtGo Missfon !ki'nutes" / •� Fabnua�ry��2,5��g86 � e 9 D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13203 - ROBERTSON HOMES - iTdATEW - A residential LyeTlopment consisting of cony ot,lnaum units on 10 3 acres of 1_and in the Kr,,.Num high Residential District (14 -2.4 du /ac) located on the north side of,�rrow'Route, ad ;scent 'to the'ent side of Deer Greek Channel - APN 208- 341 -13. Howard Fields, Assistant Planner, revi&I�d the staff_report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Hardy Strozier, representing the applicant, gave an overvie,i of the project. Mr. Strozier referred to copdition 6 of the Resolution requiring a 3 -foot low ` profile wall along Arrow Route. He suggested that flexibility be g0in to allow the use of berming and;softscapingc Brad Buller, City Planner,; suggested' ,'if the Commission concurred with the { applicant on this request, staff be directed to work with the applicant sincF the wall,. -iaht be necessary in some areas, further There were no comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Codnnissioner Barker stated that some time ago.he requested a report from staff which would outline the rules, regulations and limitations of.,fire sprinklers and alarms on 3 -story buildings in the City: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, advised that the City ,Building Offi'ti -sal was preparing this report for the Commission. Chairman Stout asked if the Foothill Fire District was satisfied' by not requiring sprinklers. Mr. Strozirr replied that the Fire District had required sprinklers on all ` buildings which do nbt meet the 350 -foot requirement; therefore, those buildings had been provided with sprinklers. ' `-` Commissioner Barker stated that a lot of work by staff ani the applicant had gone into this project in an effort to open,up the site Plan:_ Chairman Stout requested that dens .,ty averages for pro;,2cts be included in future staff. report. Commissioner Chftiea agreed that-the project had come a long way in rede�i9n to open up the open space. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, to issue a Negative Declaration* and adopt the Resolution approving ..Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 13203 with a modification to Planning Condition 6 all owing�jflexibility in the use of a 3 -foot low profile .along Arrow Route to the ;satllsfaction of the City Planner, and the requirement for fire alarms on all 3-story units; Motion carried by the following vote: -; Planning Commission Minutes -4- February 26p 1986 't P AYES :: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, REMPEL, CHITIEA, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS:, NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL carried E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9349 - SMITH - A division of 1.3 acres -of'- an into Z parses in the Very Low Re s 3sntial District (1-2 du /ac) located on the south side of Strang Lane, west of rarneltan Avenue i.PN 1061- 271 -07. � I Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report.. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There were no comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Rempel was very concerned that the Commission policy requiring public streets was not being followed if the parcelization was approved without street dedication. After discussion, the Commission determined that additional information relative to exact lot dimension and detailed map of the surrounding parcels would be necessary prior to considering this request. Chairman Stout asked, if the applicant would consent to a continuation Brian Smith, applicant, replied that he would agree to a continuance: Chairman Stout reopened the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Darker, carried, to continue the public nearing for Enviro nmental Assessment and parcel Map 9349 the the March 26, 1986 Planning Commission meeting'. NEW BUSINESS F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -44 - FALK - A proposal to develop a , foot oo n us ria ui ng on acres of land along the southeast corner of 6th Street and Lucas Ranch Road in Subarea 5 (General' Industrial /Rail Served) APN 210 -32 -05 N 06. John Meyer, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout Invited public comment. Gerald Edwards, 37.80- Ec!- .ards, Claremont, applicant, was concerned with the recommended rsloca +lion of the employee plaza area which placed the plaza area '`; 60 feet closer to' 6th .Street. Re pointed out that this location near the sidewalk and street would not create a relaxing atmosphere for em'PA eesp Ne was. also concewned that the 400 square feet required for the plaza area was Planning Commission Minutes -5- February 26, 1:986 t �17.'",i too large. Regarding trash enclosures, he requested that theyy . be moved to a more central location in the project, Mr. Edwards asked for clarification of Standard Condition P-4 requiring the filing of a Notice of Intention to joifi,, end/or form landsope and lighting districts With the City Council, Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Ergimaer, advisedt'at this condition was actually a requirement for a Notice of Intention to join an!/or form the median island land cape district, which is required of all dovelopment within the Industrial Specific Plan area. There were no further comments, thereft :,e the public hearing was closes. Commissioner Barker understood the applicant's concern relative to the placement of the: employee -plaza plaza area near the si4ewalki however, - could -not &upport his concern with the 400 square foot requirement., Chairman Stout suggested that landscaping be in vided in the current, trash enclosure area and that the trash enclosures be relocated to a central location. He was concerned with the corner section of the lot at 6th Str"t and Lucas Ranch Road and suggested that special. landscaping be provided. Commissioner Chitiea supported the placement of the jAaza area as.propased in the original site plan with the,. condition` that the size remain kOO square feet, and the relocation of the 'c*�,.ish enclosures to a central location. She was concerned with the gray color of ,,he accent,band and suggested something omething more colorfull. which should be submi'16ted on the Design Review Ciammittee consent calendar for approval. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, sieconded,by Barker, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Oevelopment Review 85-44 with added conaitions that the trash enclosures be moved to a central location, a 400 square foot employee plaza area to be located as on the original site plan, special laadscape trc-_1Tent on the exposed corner section of ' u cas Ranch Road and 6til"i Street, and the color band to be submitted on the Design Review consent calendar for approval. Motion carried by "the following vote:,- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHIT IEA., BARKER,-REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIOENRS: NONE ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNiEL -carried G. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 12830 - CITATION - Design Review for Tract 12830, a resRential subdivision of 21.4A acres in the Low Medium Residential District (4-8 du/ac) into 103 lots. located on the west side of Beryl Street, north of Base Line Road. -DrUce Cook, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chain-maza Stout -invited pubic comment. ,Planning Comm3,3sion Minutes -6- Februi. ry 26, 1986W , Jerry Linton,., represc,�ting,'the 'applicant, addressed condition 2 of the Resolution requiring: single ,story floor plans on ,Lots 88 through, 97. '`He stated; that Lots 88 89 and 91 do-not-have existing homes °behind the and ' requested that 2 -story floor `plans be allowed. He objected to fencing off the flood control area with a solid ,'fence or wall and was concerned that this would create an area to hide vardals. ` Mr. Cook advised that this 'topic was discussed at the neighborhood meeting and the suggestion was that wrought iron be used which would create a view area. Mr. Linton pointed, out that the condition stated "wall" and was concerned that - wrought iron would not afford privacy for the residents of the lots ai:kiacent to the,flood control. area. ,. K Scott Allen,_ project architect, objected to condition 3 of the Resolution requiring architectural 4etails on front elevations to be carried to some ` 'three extent. to -the other elevations,: He si„tea that in most cases the side elevations will be hidden by. fencing and lan ;caping,46d could not see the necessity for the condition. He asked for ttarification of "public vie:i" relative to- retaining walls. Mr. Allen objectedxto landscaping requirements listed in conditions 13 and 14,. and stated that the homeowners .could probably pw�fer to do their own landscaping, 7, The ,fallowing individuals addressed the Commission in opprsiti^.,-,,to the ,. project based on grading concerns and loss of view and privacy; Martin Balding, 9016 Ld'vine, Ranche,Cucamonga James Chilson, 9036 Lavine,- Rancho•Cucamona Geraldine Putnar, 9036 Lavine; Rancho Cucamonga: ' Norm Hiller, 7057 Garnet, Rancho Cucamonga Alex Sanchez, 906 Lavine, Rancho Cucamonga There were no further comments �efore the public hearing was closed. LLh � L � After discussion t r '„ • ..a � e �o�niss. .� +,�:rmin�� that further information was needed to address tie following arfim :. The C•om.ui ssion was very concerned that building pads not been graded ,had according to the approved grading ,;plan for this tract. Staff was directed 'to, check the grading to insure `the• approved grading plan was '-Constructed with the conceptual ,plan and whether the existing grading was per the approved plans. An exhibit was requested which would depict the steeetscape with 2- story,units on Lots 88,;89, and 91 as requested by the applicant. Direction was given to the staff ; and 'City .Attorney to review the terms ,, of the I , Right -of -Way agreemer'* with the Flood Control District, relative to' fencing. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded'by RE.mpel, carried, to cc.ntinue discussion of Design Review for. Tentative Tract 12830, Citation BuiI de: rs, o.the March 2:6, 1986 PIanning fommission meeting. R, Y ik Rivr�ning C:ommisiif'on Minutes -7- February �t, 1986 , H. CONDITIOWAL USE PERMIT! 85 -26:'- WILLIAM LYON - Consideration of to perimeter wall treawent for a recreatlona. ve icIe storage /mini- warehouse facility; appeal,of the decision of Design - Review Committee. Bruce Cook, Associate 16,;-e.r, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout invited public comment. Jim ifl,1y, representing the William Lyon Company, requested reconsideration of the Design Committee's recr-nnndation of tree pockets at 100 t�pot interval's and off' nets in the east , v ,t boundary walls surrounding; the .recreational vehicle storage /mini - warehouse, eacility. Mr. Bailey was concerned that this condition would decrease the usable storage and parking space and would create security hazards and maintenance difficulties. Mr, Bailey a_vured ;he Commission that if they weve not pleased with the final product, he would see to it 1' hat modifications wound be made: Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carried, to approve the wall design for the perimeter wall treatment for Condit oral Use Perm9t 85 -26 as proposed by the applicant,. with the use of vines on alternate wall sectiovis. DIRECTOR`S .µ. RT* • I. HUNTE GE SPECIFIC PLAN - CITY OF FONTANA, - Planning Commission rep 4--of ti nd use alter eves torte enter s. Ridge Specific Plan on 567.3 acres of land within the City. of Fontana, located on the north side of Suamit.Avenue east of San Sevaine Creek, hest of Devore Freeway. Curt Johnston, A .t.ociate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout sdted " that all , three alternatives _presented 'mere unacceptable:. He advised that staff had done an excellent job of ovalining the Comeission's concern in the staff report and suggested that these commants be forwarded to Fontans. !le could rot support any of the alternatives until those issues have been addressed.. Mr. Jovinston - dvised that staff and the Commission would have an opportunity to review and comment on the Environmental Impact Report to make sure that mitigation measures are implemented to address the concerns listed in the staff report. It wc$s the consensus of the Commission that none of the alternatives presented were -rcceptable and directed sta•Ef to forward the crncerns outlined in the staff report and the following comments to &e City of Fontana: 1. The overall density is high given site eonstraiits and the rural character , of the area. 2. The intensity of multi- family units along 1 -15 and commercial developmeft will establish' an undesirable precedent, for future developrmnt on surrounding property and along I -15. Planning Commission minutes -8- February 26 *1585 3. Natural featuresolf the S� re wil l be 'Si 3. a9 +tered° by the1 M `n, Equestrian trans should be locates atb,acefit to Sanf Sevaine wash. 5. Tmpravement coats di rectly , ral ated; ,410 the pro,"lidt, but wti thf h,," Rkncho S3 Cucamonga, must be provide&! -0 -the deu'elbper,,and /or the City of Fontana.' 6. Altsrnat.ves One or Tttr�!a, with large labs alang�the southern boundary of the project and Au �or�ercial�facil•i't .t ace i�east�,obJ,ectibrsabl,e.` a 4 (Added:Ttem) L J. STATUS REPORT TERRAaVISTAiPAR,K DESIGN Dave Leonard. Park`s "f 4P oJect CoordinnTor,; resente readerin's of Tdre 4.'Sta H Park. dg 9 t Motion; Moved, by Rempel,o secon- by Chi i ia, unanimously - carried, to-forward` ' the park design to,the City Council F•. *� *�* �'� l/ a -ADJOURNMENT Motion; Moved by Rempel, seconded by Baker; unanimously carried, to; „adjourn * 10:45 p.m. - Planniny;CQrtsnission adjourned,.,, e Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Deputy Secretary 3' 4 8. Plannin Camnssi"dn °�nues -9- February 2, 198 .� i a _ W5 1, CITY ,O RA g HZI CUCAMCiNGA STAVP MOM O OW' F a '1977' DATE: February 26;,'1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Co- mission ` t. FROM: Brad Buller, Citi lanner BY John R. ,Meyer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSYON FOR 7ENTATIVE TRACT``12.4,62 JENSE4 A custom . of rd identi:al subdivision acres of land in the V1 District ?ocated :on.the. south side of Summit,. east- of` Etiwanda Avenue, within the Etiwanda S0dVic Plane -.A.PN 2215- 181 -02 & °Q3. I. BACKGROUND: Associated Engineers` representing Mr. Jensen, the > owner o? entative Tract 12462 eq , are ruesting a two year time extension for! the above ''described tract. Tract 12462 was originally aNpaved Qecember 14, 198��. In November 'o; 1984, a moratorium was :e3,tab`l:1shed in the Etiwanda Specific Plan area for the development of drainage master _plan, and deve]opsient pal,icy. That moratorium was. lifted ~on May 20.,- 1985, by, the Cttiy Council.. ' Tentative Tract was then i4utomatically Oxt�nde�'to April 26, 19$6'. Th>';tractwas approved, as,ta. custom lot - subdivision l wherein, individu`t :1' s could be sold for development. �} IE. ANALYSIS: Staff has analneo the proposed time extension with the _ development criteria outlined, in the City's Development 'Code and' , Etiwanda., Specific Plan. '.,Based upon this review, the project meets ^ the basic developim,ent standards -for the Very Low "Res°idential District: ' The maximum time period for tentative maps is 5 years. Therefore, u' the Planning--Commission could grant up to a 36 month extension to. K April 26, 1989. k i ITEM Azt,e ` .Sa:s+2�h t ui rT Febriiar�r TEntative irae�1246� Jn"se+i °,1 r Page 41" - iThe, „ III. REGOMENDATION Planning , Division race nenris 'a 35 —month extarsion to Apr „il'6,`1984 y Respectfully sUbm' ed,' a+ Brad - Sul ler City Planner , BB:JRM:das' f J” Attachments. Letter from =�pp7 cant �^ Exhibit Locatn �.; . Exhib -#"8 � 5ife Plate Y Original.ResolNt- of "tap�rbval with Cond3ti4ns ; �� cx, Xtx Time EXtens� n Resold"D ,r ,i I Jfl � ^b x„ of "t: AssacY ��aaiedng�:nersrsr Ct3A9ULTiIVQCIUILENCiI(dEER3`' aid EASY ,Ef STWEE�Tr a ONTAWIOr CALIFORNIA 91764 c' 17141 986 8818: �- �, t PEA LING ADDRESS F.O $OX 9419,'ONTARIO; CA WB1 February 3, 1986 C/Ty�R 0� ie 4 Mr. Brad Buller, PlanningaDi'rector a/a„ a k City of Rancho Cucamongar� ' P.O. Box 897 /l++jl Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Vjir s Subject:?'' Request:-for Extension of 'Tentative Map Approval- for Tract No 12462 , Reference: Rick Gomez Letter 'to Bob Jensen, Dated May 21, 19g.., !r ; (Attached) " 1 41 Dear Mr. Buller: While construction drawings fore 't —f, portion of t'►e niiianda Drainage Plan to serve, the-area whit includdls Tract 12462 aro'nearzng completion, agreements for funding theser±storm� drain improvemEhts are still - under`' discussion. These discussions between the.City and several 1'aadowners'' ' and Cpvelo ers. are continuin while we belleva ro ess is being P 9� P, 4r g , made; .until an agreement is, reached, Fir. Jensen,c'annot record this tract. ,e� y Therefore a two year extension of the;,.apprdval of the Tentative Map for Tract No. 12464 is� requested, on behalf of Bob lcoppn, Inc, in } accordance with the referenced letter. The required,,a2'fee is enclosed. ' Very truly yours, li a• s ,npbert E. Mills REM /kf + Enc. { cc: Bob Jensen Lloyd Hubb's q. 1 may; FW . ' gr� 3 PNPf7NG �( DESIGNING SC6t1+EYINGz�� � Sq } 1 { a li7Ui6 CITAUS 511086 _ D N sM• AM �. CIYRUs xsJSC ', uT o5ovs IWss `q 7 1'14A 'I CITRRUD PPP ` "Over 's H CITRUS ` CAM — /P-1 m "SC NOISE h "ousc "o ust SUYYIT ` AVE"ut .. .` a.; d I Susiccr PROPERTY VACANT ` r i USC NDU7C VAC T " _ M1 '" _ SHASTA _ ORRIC k` IIWl6 IIW St CXISYIRO CITRUS oROY[ FROM C-fAf11L7 R631OtXl{Y f f y VACANT Y'PRoPOSY4-. sl %%LC FAYILT. RESIDENTIAL VACANT` 1 At I VACANT VCANT f MOroWJ< J P-1-20 / f /AVIARY � NmrH CITY. CF } R �rrrr mss I`h� EL.A"rl 'M DIVMN . Fxmur- __&_..sr_A .E : ii e � r� r g • �3z � � � _ o �E', s t j j Vii.. C ow cli r 1 ✓ r Via. 6 3 w3nv' Lo gR r i y o J { t p j F � ,jam -.-. � -. _ _--• �3� <nJ � � .!' � _ .f Y rn N CI'T'Y OF ITEM- RA CM C€UAl�IO TITLE PLAMING DrVISM EXHIBIT SCALE _ - �_� t�ia�Ir►�s ` RESOLUTION NO. 83 -140 U A RESOLUTION OF THE` PLANNING`-COMMISSION OF THE CITi! OF- RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12462 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12462 ' hereinafter "Map" submitted ' by Jensen 8ulders, Inc„ *applicant, for the purpose of subdividing `the rear property situai,ed in the City of Rancho' Cucaimon,ga, County of San t nardind, StAte of California, described as a.-custom lot residential sub division. into 27 lots, regularly came before the Plargncng Commission` for public hearing and action on December 10, 1983 and - WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject' A:o all conditions set forth in the Engineering, and .,Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commisw, on has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divi sion, a repof.ts'Md has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. X NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning "66mission of the City of Rancho f. Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning ;Commission makes the fallowing findings in ` regard to Tentdtive'Tract No. 12462 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent With the General .. Plan and specific plans.. (b) The design cr improvemenii- of the tentative tract is i consistent with the General Plan.and specific ;'plans; ' (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; �r ifs' ' aF (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and. avoidabie x injury to humans and wildlife or their habi tat; (e) The tentativc, tract is not likely to cause serious piO lic health problems; (f) `Qn of the.. tentative tract will not conflict easement acgluired by the public at large, y,. now ups -_ cord, for access through or use, of the property within the.+.pr,oposed subdivision: (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a .Negative Declaration is issued, 4 �. ��'� � � �� °.. �;� �` � � {' •fit T �� . Resolution k Page 2 5 4 SECTION 2: Tentatiye Tract Map No. 12462, a copy of -Which "is ; ., attached hereto, is fiereby ;approved subject to all of the following,conditions ` and the attached Standard Conditions. => 5 PLANNING DIVISION,; u 1. The existing'windrow located continuous to Summit Avenue; shall, -be preserved. All;,,' oil -site windrows shall 'be pheserYed or replaced,41tp ;,Eucalyptus _Maculata, per. Et�i;wanda Specific R1an` standar -tl's; " , , 2. :,Future acces3 to'- lots' 1.,* 11, &'�`2' 'shall be gained 04,L16ca1 avenues A or B.- Access shall 6e restr.ictedk along Summi.f Aviabe� 3. Fuca tiz=dt:ineways located. on` Summit Avenue, shall be equipped with .; a :nonslip texturized treatment designed to,�accommodate equestrian travel. ` g 4. This ;project, " shall comply v�ith aTl applicable _standards and; regulationsretatied to the Etiwanda • ? Specific Plan. ENGINEERING'DIV.ISION 5. Storm�drain,overflow structure shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer from Court ., :11C11 to Avenue "8, , APPRIVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th DAY, OF DECEM$ER, 1983. ' PLAW G OMMISSION.OF THE C MT OF RANCHO`CUCAMONGA , BY: r Dennis Stou a rmar ATTEST: Acti g retary o t e arming Commission ly_ Ar F 4 F „Rescolut3 ^n No,'83 k x -Page 3 _ Y h i ^ti4 / � I, RICK GOMEZ, Acting Seeretxary of the P °fanning Commission o' f the City of Rancho 'Cucamonga, do hereby ce tai yr °� that the farega�ng _Resoslhton was duly, and ` r� regularly introduced, Rassgd sand ;.adopted' by tho Prdnn:ing Gommissionf' of the f City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Cegular4meet7r�,g� of eth'e Plannigg CommisS oo held s - on the 14th day of OecembeK 19193, Eby the :fol "lour =ing vot6-t0 wit: AYES: COMMISSIONER45: REMPEL,,- BARKER, STOUT k. NOES: COMMISSIONERS. '-NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONER=S: JUAREZ, MCNIEL `1 �j r > 9 11 P i <. °u A. c.� yt. � ° <' u me �:. `,a,•�' .oa n. %ii '" yL L m .� -< 6� 7O V = b,Y C ^. ~qC YN,, O,L,•T.� b A^ m 06.^ r C QQ 4 OeA pYC VC 6.l q�q Nom. O. bG Ry Nw qy Vim. d�,L �ygQ �^4 a� ^�. dr9 d A•.. Y Y.r.° < Y < G l Q 01q cr bC l•. HL OA V uu ' •J'7 gdgN ^� 00:' �.0�0 Y=L �ws `>■■`� O u a. ELtLLVi V�6 ap.<U OO oUq .SS NA, YQ�.. 90 d^ LOI A'= b °N �yo S}�C dq N. .0 G'N`' i�L LSO °e 9J LO+ J^6p! Nom EL tOY� Qs� 6L re'O N < pCgqpppC%%%% zO tlL N •� a Gy^ Y.°ed E.N. LC��.t. ^ ^.L AIM m °vqy AO ntla ZO... YN N. rna <� �v�w q +Y Ya,^r`. o. ale•$. :30 �` Rf- aI �'L'Ye tlti B�• n <n Sii mqd N' q�K Hs ^ 3y Y w- T a�w$ ycuicic,a�� •=e ^ <o� , oQ c< oN` o ma 9^ Yvs •°i a.> Y C'O `Lu^ N itlY RV � t, b= _1t TyN.JO p n3 L.�� b iY Tq.^. Y �_ �1 ``� p..; AaIAT <N�YY 604N >Yp •C OAL4 <32.9 '•a Nava <�!1. 00 <L l�ON w.•. /6 HZ N.O l N j � d Gv f•^ 4 aY A C vz o zz r a^ s o.TY Gi n - YY is ^.... I Vq p� t. .5�.• �1� YY.tI Ovr•. OHx N� SAO oyb gg Lt q Y `� O O q •�.1� �L V .NQO ^N. E. yC YN C�.w i J L KwY TV A DA CN- Ki {c1yy ,C •C4PL C�v dYp 00. N+ �Nt. Y Y y YY J ..+�L Sp t �C.• Cid '.NU O !^O OCY✓ ir�r ,?yi. �N •'` wM N•N -Od�.O UE�6 •OJdY hA L6 f-9 Z<.dOt - -'^. A. �.. .�..• N Pf • Ys "y ^` Nom' IZ w ti < a V. 0 J O i 0. ki- A O O ^ Oy a a C e a.° ` `2 ! !6z N L ^r X04 ° cr .yi w V O N O� ?L 0°ON O ^VL UOap, Q': gg ° Y 4sa5au► ►ANN YyQ.c 00 LO'PL �•OiA O 6 N n tea— a 6 >Y> y�qN C'iT T.q yCi C.0 ww. >'° a d rr g •ii Nn g °w��a.r'.ay�e qic q q rM ��V$YYL O'PY Y' O sue. WWE�o.'•..�a °���� ��� �,�.. 0.i S_e4•a ^° �S. p a w ts.+. M ^•. U QA id V V a Y Y C L G U qp N QC A 7v 60 S O _ C H 6 0 �I Ufa A v.K i.O �.:�.� +•aC'aV : O'y �t U � {1V1r N a�^ CA y' O. d Oyg1'�. at —JCL A r a � aUOU a�T C� U 06,NS�O dIM OO-lei CCGtO �j pAp LOgp w o ° CN U t xwxy p`Ng� r O w y �vOY i g'w" aL Ndo�.�FM.$LPP'vp9$. NQy _qQ.. t_Y OL L3 qW= v°p. 0a.C`CO O ttU POa e. N Lw y QQyy c tt S42; 00 vaLx N+ G O O L q C W O O M � %y CC S L=� gO10 � =.0 OO�pNi�. OSW� rV yy ' varUUC pLY >Q PyCO C.•Oi�O yfLiN�0� Vr q YG O. Y A�G9 1 y— `NY —a6 �(r YO= so. �oVvq< C OO y. L ACLd O Oyy V Q Sr q ^M.�� ti O� UAL p� O a 3 y� OaMy —yYr �Q. �.��. 6•—gi� °.a '° —v5 V�'.j.' �O � S` �:4?�:,• /� °r0 MuC C'� x •^` —Uas A G"O^ a�Y u Cn�L OW QQp— O C, gw, .O Ltq.NY -.322 �. 4 =.. C pp bsu PC PC L061 N O C S � LOO 'OCC EUC 9. C� Oaa.VYCA~6 <�.pO < D ?x lO 4` GL[.. v La YC lv Oil p.G L OO4 A e.cP uV:O��� .AU °v u^ <oOOVY ' �.- L�f t avn�.LC.0 oaM oc• �.cc ca Kf Na N •V 4Y JrO O.Y ASP— F+ y.NCA k7 '4 �'^"'�"•+ '1 t �•-„�.L�, "�.":ai�+.6a. e.EL;. E..A2t':iu. L P O rj I y JJJ wpa �LUO .y-. 1u1 ^4 a�i :::, ^u qe�u 6LdN tGi <�•• Uzi c w aC i'ra cuo s9d c�.d A. YO L"o aY $L c sL < $ YyC6 roiw d L.V� 9 b q 9N A 1iL wO; 9 G U °•^� �s L 'Qq V N V p ,�6 � �L G bw0.0 � V d aaO d0O %bd NN o°t °u'bi °c ALL...s ..` co•> >� $ ag pL d i 6 BYO nefj w Tm q -M o�N .: O C w tea• 9°]y9 'p a4d Y0 c S— NSW it 6y�U NO CA6 G Y.q. 9 ^C 60C L1 OxA� �,�qG\ LCgg Nd >6 Y u' sN.Na i NOYr N tv 4C N Ud d ^N OCCO < d' l 9 V Y db N ro +. q ^� ,dC4 6N LG <w +O0. KY 1=a.« Ewa °uw NNC 3,'AM JL6�� F A�N�.. 641.m 6.V M I q Yf �C O+Om i r C a L G 4.0 dq • C: Oc.O�..j� qr CO ♦�c'd �a N. Ob UL.i LIyF yY b G GQ GtH Gt N.Lp Gi' �� O a p � C• YN 6 � U: wV H.9 L N Y � yG �Nd NY Y t� .°•C S O ��L �$ p. �NNO L °pp g d� D y 4Y6A 7L� 01YC Y�'L N[C./ L Lam`' ^ML xl Q y r Lt a—.NN O:�LGN g � >y`,�Q. <q x �. N N SNgpj C:d OO a'c> O¢C+N2AN L¢¢ S. g,=5 ° V. p^ f..i � CCCLcyy.0 OA <r }Y L�qC tCCtallllc � N OY C p�Od� ^� �? y �L VdQA QpY d.�GgypO�.� 7' DLO 6 �N 0.y.�ak OLd dOC w Y3. ^ P} S� aJ..Lr� O 9L dro.y�w... OuYf pl.. Gam.. n.�� .L+ ro•oo `sa qa d.. �c qs� ,c a��tY.d d � e� -^ YNea ca9oo -. } w o^ cwy -It O� OL °A LYC VO.�c�O t�bC D N4C ^6p AYp LN �% .• bLY�r � p 8w. rf A a.. �wV wti° C .•G..6 G >\ d0� ...� YVq.N 10 Gj rot d'^ ye Y ^Q O3 4TAY L p coGCAO G ` ~d N ...^ — �'�T d O.L U � ° Cw C� q • 4 N �� 601 J:N 1gif8 6- U O s- .9 ,t i y. u U Y 3 C ^ ^: ,,cc ° C _ %.'tt y 4. .0 �+ C cA •+ B U ^ � n. 7 w w � �..• � d'^ < 69 F'OM� 4,r 69 WYN 062N �-N <Nr� «9 KlY Y3 Vldd I i r� W G'{' - . bcQ.0 udaim �'d ,o� �rL.re c d rr u. . '. :;y Y.YT � rr ��fv aN 'a' S a°r< $•: 9. .b qNL _ v_< q,w � ° Y?F O d O N 01L p C0 Z L d Y V L. ...�W p m C. d p05°r '^ H d U LA f•• fi3 d T2 Y 6 Yy b c NO-0f.N NpN� ggp�:a V �d -0y C �U y °O E C q Y C O C L� a .� �• C F� O y T d b. O1 a a a � U N a f O. _ OaN�OJYR aafaa„�j V6n-g h Clv. NC.. QII rUi.W Nu�V'C f.°.. 0� q,�ry LC ^°yw 6EO� O may. � CN<� L ly C' 9° y5O OV :ate - N� »v OY Cr_ UCpf YILgi �'��yn Fri +}'VAC °O }NrW N N O�gAU 4 WNW -C L�•c L '.Of° • O;A L C6ffDyq OG.uL LG�9 dE r Ji �4L+1� L _MIN Q6UL l 4 C a O�.'r <H %6O Ct -S D6 a°~ c e t �.fr �L f°ifa DOU ��aA'KY C61 T.1 hp 0:::Td @.q w a u C a C �rA a L Of�S Y C c V ti U04.. a °d � uS•ri - y°.VYd d � � p a r rr L V.' V I-0 5 4 C u B�.» i°0 a P c. _ —b �auNi _ I v� ci p_ p �� m L° `suY= a SC L E 0i]�f•' Y y=lif _ rypWN.. C L Ov .r. '.B V gy C < a I L } iOao < � 6a as 'o qa ^« L `n pa -°• •-�q� C;q C » Nr AO ` a` y y6 :5 Oft q �v M -y <Q OM V, ♦� ��. O y. 4a Fa O » 04 W e�.� mr O.S a U Y R6 L�Q�+n /Q 6q U� Q. 15 V ro4 6;;a; Gt V,QU L L�"L. ±1� <EeNLt'^ 6i'O U"..! L °�i Mf•`6dN dLy� C q Lr hr 4 U 1 a iN E� W4. Wfi= RaYUY -w F4 i� G � I �. i2LU.NG N ai 1�41YL ., y�. 1 U Ali- U 0 � d9 0 yd U Y y_N L aleNF, O V COY... G. l - q �i 0 0 N OL L m O p OJI N ^ . yt N O 0 6 ti. .La.q Ct °r. v • p orOw: o y yt .. J � °i 4n o �B ^o roNe I° d ciw N o ° � p �. O OYr Od ^.+ 7•C N� 0u0 �i' Eq E6 W =. �._ sa N dOa gC 6 LF ON 0 N L d� p C r ° 4 E S.. 9� i N 6Yti. tD S � • I Qt ° •• 0 O y L C`CT�� GIN O^=N �� O!. � `6 q N YL 00 � Yd 9 N d 0C E L d O N W � C .. L E6 W � LO. ..q L Y`. pvi0 AL 0V.i e g mN 3^ C _ CB. Ut00 i J �> M 0 0 N N O N 6 P ••- ae.d -a. o ppgoa ,• O ci I to m09 r9� QYr . �OY 9C] ON N C t z C W Ln I I OtY00 a Z y n L r L q F00 0 0 0 G q L L0. E C. G L �+ac �LLU1 r5,� m �O U�iC 6DO VN.w r •�6 9C0 i. Nplr G`. w 4 OL LL 6rL„i d N OL OL W 4 OC S dC ..« p is dyL tap O r O E 6 A.. v u T 9 9 V "• 9 7 O C Vy ^9:C O q OT ' y O.a C�. • - >♦ E qq pn yL ±. 53.F0 dNM C py • L L �T N ON 0 G C •� � a G N r G y to .N P Lt Y a 0 'a. •- .� ( N �.OmYOrt OlyO qyL Sl1. :C91 c00 ��C Q C r •Ora y �vqi'° c °LO 2H 9 c0 YucF QaF m°'c.. '°no .r q.a al u p u4 o- d D 0 0 3 QA A S6'�H F ° d@ 6 u0 1 y ^0'L :IL 0u Ot` o .. �? q - • If a ppFI 3 N'.�. I i M I°,tb 5 a• is g N O 4O 1° � `V�u. L 9 6v � •- GN N q L N N 9d u LY HE V t� YH- ��• `5 •�: ui •O Y •i Y C. N WE O L `°ti' N • O. IY �L .+ AAA Yr „°,° ° a A � r +� r Y Y y G U L C V 4 G 6 a V _CA _ by fv G G G Q C w.r d a � 8 �zqa q� at °'• au v a q q L "`,1L,, .iv ,. u °d ol qe 5 v� 4Aw - V rW :OC OG nq q14 y }a 33u CWr 4zm- NO FOE S, LL bC L Y rya 4vE . Cp dL Y Y Ci TU gi �. O -YA YO PO L: ".G YY Cd O � ^Y d\!51� `sV'7� 4V1pa `fI �d_t(i \rvh\ F V. -5Z Y .era 'o 1r..V YOB a c WO oaaaS ~ 3 p O G� aQ:� N S.2 ND 1G. w E .Lr �`2 G • ° 4 N cW q N a= 4 "O N V G t O 4 A Y l Y E 6 N N L d Y1v o ar LOQ ua n O Y 40 Wy 6 L A Y4® �a d n]� d N:yd N a:. ^ m.. q "' d Y AI Y X Y « ^n'.Y O v ♦1G .•. Na OL a+ay �9 NbN O Eg- A Y�G wl Eq °Y0 La CMV qC NN Y YV0 Y C L G YAC N� 3�A O G V L y, 1 !q r aq^ °G GA Cl C y.• °� -a00 '.aa Gy G 6 EEL4 qd VLi as V Y7n4 N Vw 1 L I p v4 CJ IIF- W N L o _40?a G ON Y G� 1. }P -,S LYC aCd �qV f1 dEN 4 d64.z I wl n OL A" 41 M01 4 G B a _-o a Op d S „� VC e-• C E °E'E] yy O dAF „AV C.O C C C Nn Uq^ u O C A q C R ... q r L Y O• U „ d q Y A Y'. u Y.'Y 4 � !• � A a 'l Q C q �:., p " yy 4U +E 6NU L G C O NnWq^ 3.•. L •4 �' «N VIO�O VINO 4.10r« QLI. tL� W4+N'L i'U 3,.6 u °a t,. Ze Y " S is C) i 1- t a , F 6 a is O N p, N O e b ~ o r. d Y _ C� La d6pT L pya NO i pY y� ,pL G 9 d C v p CC O C d d A q L SL p 7\ _ • Y u 9 9 ` � i ,.. MW `RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION -OF THE RANCH07CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, i APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE-TRACT 12462 WHEREAS, a request, has been '?iled for a time extgpAon for the ' above- described pvcject, purseanteto Section 16.04.070 4 WHEREAS,. .the Planning Commission conditionally ,approved the above- described Tract. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made `the fo11owing f3 —; -. A. That prevai'lrng economic conditions have caused a a` distressed market climate for detielopment of the project. BP That current' -economic, marketing, .and., - inventory conditions make it unreasonable `to develop the s project at !,his time. } C. TKat strict enforcement oi` tbf'conditions of approval regarding expirations would- not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. '. 0. That the granting of said time extension will, not be ' detrimental to the public health, safety,•or welfare, or m;t rially injurious to properties or improva%ants j . in the-'vicinity-. _. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga VPlanning Commission hereby grants :a time extensior: _ Pro ect A3� >licant I Expiration 4, TT 12462 Jensen April'26, 1989 ;4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY!"tiF FEBRUARY, 1986: ' a PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO;CUCAMONGA' BY- 1J, Dennis L. Stouto Chatman ATTEST• Buller, Deputy Secretary. ., ate. 1'LAt�N`TN CbMMi S p RE�SOL T�It�N �' 4 h Feb' Tentat*ve ,7raci .12fi2 Jansen . Pa 9 e -2 x r� I, Brad BuilerT Oepu}y Secreilary of the Planning Comission of the City. of, A Rancho Cucamonga, do ereby certify thy& tFso foregoing Resolutipp was duly and. t -City oftRanch.r Cueamo aassd arlluar meetini ofpeaP7ahntn�' ryraeissSS r�f'h'eirl ^� on the 26th day of February;; 198x, 4by the f . tywing vote -to w.,�; } , . AYES : COMMISSIONERS: NOES: GOtNISSIUMERS::. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSv ;T y k I yr v yy CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4 � STAFF REPORT e ara DATE;. February 29, 1986 s-' � TO: - Planning Coimnissicn FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior,�Civil Engineer BY: Ba .,u.K krall, Assistant Civil Engineer _ SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9180. - LANDCO fINANCI'AL ORPORATION - A. division, or 6.47 acres,, or • and, into parcel "s in the Genera Industial /Rail served District, Subaiaea .2, located south of Ninth 'Street and west of Hellman Avenue -.AP-N 209 = 013 -24 a, I. PROJECT AND SITE'DESCRiPTIaN: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map B. P��urp�os_e<' To divide 6.47 acres into 3 parcels for future industrial development, ' C. Location -: 500, feet South of Niith Street on the west side of Hefiman Avenue D. Parcel Sizec' Parcel 1 1.98 acres Parcel'2 - 1.90 acres 41 Parcel 3 1.90;acres ox;al 5M net acres E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial /Rail Served F. Existing_Latld Use: Vacant G. Surrounding Land Use: North - Exiisting dustrial * " South - Vacant �-�� East - Existing Industrial !Jest - Vacant- A' H. Surroundin General Plan and Development Code Des, nations: North - General Industrial /Rai] Served- Subarea South r Hera! Industrial /Rail Served - Subarea 2 East - General Industrial Subarea 3 ;• West - General Industrial /Rail Served - Subarea 2 1, 4 a"� ITEM B � ' " PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF "'RPORT Environmental Assessment and,Parcel Map 9180` February 29, 1(,16,. Page 2 `` M I. Site Cheracteristi6s: The site is 4acant (y ;• _ and slopes in a' southerly ire3 :coon, 11. ANALYSIS: This parcel map divides 6,47 acres into 3 parcels for future indUtrial development. I` Lion Street is to -be constructed upon recordation of the parcel map. iF Missing off -site improvements on Hellman Avenue will be completed when` I. Parcel 3-develops.. , I" Utility Undergroundina No overhead utilities exist fronting this project, however, lines do r exist on the opposing side of Hellman Avenue. It is recommended an in- lieu fee equivalent to one -half of the F. established cost of undergrounding 229 feet of frontage be paid prior to 4 building permit issuance for Parcel 3 and th& _ jl 'services to the entire site be provided underground. s III. EvVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial St!idy as completed "by the applicant. Staff has F completed Part iI of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of'the- Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed su .r bdivision. p• IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property, owners and placed in the Daily Report: Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed, J V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input an elements of Tentative Parcel Map 9180, If after such K: consideration, the Commission can 'commend approval," then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be °appropriate. Respectfully _ submitted, BRH :BK:jaa a t. 4 Attachments: Vicinity Map Tentative Man . Resolution Recommended Conditions of Approval 1) Initial Study , `kn } Ap, O *. O O O j subarea 1 O C O _ O � F A 0 '. ubarea 3 Site i �'oF E PARCEL MAP" 9180 r1 �� PROJECT •— '',sv` �'dt1 1Q,4.,�U�iA��1�'17f A� tai TI MyI_E: VICINITY Mi�P s * -1 rr e ��� r < E`�`Gi(!E „ Au,� �IiUGDiil'Mxt EXHIBIT. ': D eznTlNe I ,e?t$ I WANT Y XY' 1 Sa ..II Aft `' typ 4LG riP 1} R ••li )1� °j, ii tiu \A t IYa N�PTI Ro� �- m tT ' i_s _j � i 7.I�i� .Lw1 i[c' o iar inu fr_1, nL.•wu =str t� I �..E/Y`6'�tr • I s G •.' CPU 9- •r- ,��• —mz J '�;>il`�•�.•."�. i'uRtt ew wno ns•aR 8"sl.,y N� W Q my - w I- j`` • � �.� PARCELS s i�$� I � 1WSTt•1 • rt 4L_'VsFa.aET'� sZ. �. - b.,• },iDl y�)•aILC:SNCr "1 ' tp oRKOEi NLY3.'1 •. Sa• 17 DeV[4 LOT. �• `x ��• as ?A� (' \ ` prl'• �'� p1Y O —�i�1, .�1 �• IDtiZY"AAATXXtwwwe[[1-0 1c: DJ6 rtiACrtc.r"L „�°ct•�.�1 T IA 1l fe' ..A� `�N�C' �. }. 0,�/% Ttrtr / C ICT iD•uwcc , t�! j: T qtr_ �� • ` -STNLY LINE --r7 sE [ORNER LOT7 7 } v.M 1I l A. Y.V.. 1CtEy:i;_f Fa°R SOYTN .•I•II��•)• - CA ►TL4LYOUCED' h 1 E A Parno.rP - - - •a•y.�i e c Tsa1 nLrlaustT V A CA NT w C t•. SR 0.4• s0. 4 007` E ��" 14 L ~' r fD IPTAAOCD4GL • ITtt•r, 11T1 ]LR RfS S1 /00 011•L 8 It]azili •~ _ •,Y, Ij •N `Tid111: / RU•Y[R_+[611LL• . „., tiefSVR•H. NC aCCC I -, L• s v�1 w our PQ X 11 w cTNr i �•�a rn REwA'.IUIa Tus' ar R,e.- TRAL4s n� RL•CLTAD.1y1ED pLTIpN /O4, all CC ;NCR i "' }:A '�, q P[DK AlOC EI�r3naPtt.' ��i fiGT1oN b KR S.tR /LS EXKIBIT nB1Y; � p� 11yy _ TENTATIVE MARCH „ ��4i 1$1\ • ila GE MAP IRiRANCHOj�,J /dQbIN�e A 1NEiT 1 Of 1 fN[!Tf a N 1 :80 THE CITY OF= CUCAMOONNNGAT}[P ASIOCl lY6INn[} BEING A .TIVISION CF • ORTION OF LO' T OF A PLAT OF A 71L £AST •E• ST D.EA'511[3 !1711 .UEOIVISION OF 1.,1% LOT 10, WCAYONGA. VINEYAL'O TRACT. II OPEN PEN' YAP RECORDEG IN eOON 20. IT I113i0!0110 FAGE 11 OR .YAPS. AEC OF &AN: NE"AROINO tiOUNTT. LALIFORNIA. I „� _ GASEMV1re ARFEGTINa TN11 ►AKc, THAT ARC • - -NJT nnrTLtl: BENCHMARK 4 TO GYUN'OND1 wNLYA ;D CD FOR h .—Es RR YOYa PA64 31 0P. PCCDS. S DO GO CEt I.A. VTABS IN N. CY;D •YM bT_ 'DO•; EST 01 q-.. L— Am, 2 TO COYNTY PA 1!D RO[ ".— C FLOWAOf GLCY.. r120, 4TH ... KR 441 M4C (MIb O4 OP aDO`O,Ixs S TO V pp 1M INC 14 D[AIWOC Pu[peSS PDR 6e4[„ PAaL OT O4. 01 S DD L HOCC 1'INANLIA4 COQp[AT10N A Tp SOSLIM- N 6YM111Na GT AL ROc 'D[AINAOC RD SO. Er: FV L1N0 AvG. raY1TC 10l ►ASADLNA, C4 91101 PU4R01LP,PEC {e6Y�PADG 101 O R OR 9 DD CO (111[ 6A9�24L2 i1TIL1TlES z�ccT c —so c EtloN CD ,§ • ,. OAS 174 BOi.•gltD SCALE I'•I00• M • LIN: 11b - PNONG 6ENE[6L TCLGRIONG lLC4NTY 1 SEWERhvA7ER�N49bNOA —Tee 04TOCI l - 167.27•Tt _ •. erN- 'er EXISTING ZONING VICINMf MAP iL L S. P. itT N RALC OPndOPnL . ' i n; WD 20lAA - nTe TILS KR G! f• • ! />7 Rq NOeM • .. AL l ryOPV([D TTF 97H • A1"•IA'25.6 If s1 LL• ST ' ^"- I .i ITA.TD. nLTa �_=l I EXISTING AS 1 --Tr I- •cc•Gec°[, (7- L} i { • EXISTING Tc .I Z GRG D6 �;� . '_T,`--C»[,•..It NT R s^` f ul I `. •.. _I —�I >: L GENERAL ; GENERAL j I i t Ta; IyAS` IT [nK1.;NCS r::, i $ I INDUSTRIAL i GENERAIG. a • N -r.:i I7 r�l tA; i ilo I tr41� - INDUSTRIAL I I! ! ' lie Y Ss,'� =J INDUSTRIAL tf. Ca R'� i 1I• I. d p �• Q • .Z A ': D eznTlNe I ,e?t$ I WANT Y XY' 1 Sa ..II Aft `' typ 4LG riP 1} R ••li )1� °j, ii tiu \A t IYa N�PTI Ro� �- m tT ' i_s _j � i 7.I�i� .Lw1 i[c' o iar inu fr_1, nL.•wu =str t� I �..E/Y`6'�tr • I s G •.' CPU 9- •r- ,��• —mz J '�;>il`�•�.•."�. i'uRtt ew wno ns•aR 8"sl.,y N� W Q my - w I- j`` • � �.� PARCELS s i�$� I � 1WSTt•1 • rt 4L_'VsFa.aET'� sZ. �. - b.,• },iDl y�)•aILC:SNCr "1 ' tp oRKOEi NLY3.'1 •. Sa• 17 DeV[4 LOT. �• `x ��• as ?A� (' \ ` prl'• �'� p1Y O —�i�1, .�1 �• IDtiZY"AAATXXtwwwe[[1-0 1c: DJ6 rtiACrtc.r"L „�°ct•�.�1 T IA 1l fe' ..A� `�N�C' �. }. 0,�/% Ttrtr / C ICT iD•uwcc , t�! j: T qtr_ �� • ` -STNLY LINE --r7 sE [ORNER LOT7 7 } v.M 1I l A. Y.V.. 1CtEy:i;_f Fa°R SOYTN .•I•II��•)• - CA ►TL4LYOUCED' h 1 E A Parno.rP - - - •a•y.�i e c Tsa1 nLrlaustT V A CA NT w C t•. SR 0.4• s0. 4 007` E ��" 14 L ~' r fD IPTAAOCD4GL • ITtt•r, 11T1 ]LR RfS S1 /00 011•L 8 It]azili •~ _ •,Y, Ij •N `Tid111: / RU•Y[R_+[611LL• . „., tiefSVR•H. NC aCCC I -, L• s v�1 w our PQ X 11 w cTNr i �•�a rn REwA'.IUIa Tus' ar R,e.- TRAL4s n� RL•CLTAD.1y1ED pLTIpN /O4, all CC ;NCR i "' }:A '�, q P[DK AlOC EI�r3naPtt.' ��i fiGT1oN b KR S.tR /LS EXKIBIT nB1Y; � p� t' -10 Y �j ENVIRONat'1ENTAL R �qE� �- V � ` ` Q APPLICATION � Ft rail � a INITIAL SMY — PART I 1977 r 6ENEnAL { For all aa•ojects requiring' environmental review., this form must :be completed the submitied to the D2uelopm nt.Review Committee through,t "e department where p "rojec application 7s.. Made,t Upon receipt of tir3s ap lrcatioit; the FlanninI Divisio} staff will ,prepare Part II of the InItial,Atudy and make recommendation-. : to Planning C,ommis�sion. The Planning Corte issid�i�ri17 aka° one �,; of three dete'rhainatiogs: (Ij The project wall' 'have no significant environmental imrraci and a Vega�ti'%• Declaration wi11 be filed} icy The G oject will have �a significant environmental impact and an kEnvironmental Impact Report will'ite prepared, 'or (3) An additional infiormatioa report should be Supplied 6y'the applicant giVing further information concerning the + proposed project. Date Filed: Project Title: p.m. #. 19180 'Al ~R Applicant's Name, Address, -1ephone: Landc�o ca. oration; "U 150 So. El M611nA Ave Suiee 10I Pasadena, +: CA-911o1 . Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Pro7egt- i* r. Donild'Rarnbeck Location of Project: West Side of- Hellman Ave, rnn+ acs. of 9th St., Ra cho, Cucamonga y r. t �s `3 ' Assessors Parcel No.: L }` 4 List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and fe`derai a enci� and the agency Issuing uch g Permits': 9. es sit ks pt F ' u yggg l r .t PROJICT DESCRIPTI.ON `. Proposed use or propor�ld project: ;N This oroiect is to divide exis[in¢ parcel into 3 Rarctls Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings,,,k � if any: Project site is 6.47 acres in area. There are existing biiildin "and none r000sed =t Al fN , Describe the env ranmertal setting of the project site including information on topography sot stability, plants (trees), land animaleii -any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach .necessary sheets): Site is vacant excIaL for native Grass cove: at !]resent ':time. - An ezistne drainage Swale crosses ro erty in a north —south direccion. Sorroundine parcels are 1igh't industrial. There are -,,o historical or cultural aspects involved. t s: I Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of � cumulative %actions, which although individually small, a whole have signircant F environmental impact Lka NO �._ a Or NICK THIS' °PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in grounO contours? 2. Q,eate a substantial chalige in existing noise of produce vibration or glare ?' i x 3 create a substantial charge in demand for municipal servi es (police, f re, Water, sewage, etc.)? x ' 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or Gc,erai 4. Plan de';gnations? X, S. Remove any existinq trees? How many? 6. Create the need for use or disposal-,of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or expYvsives? X . Uplanation of any YES answE's above (attac4,,additionai sheets if necessary) 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: 31nne 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: �h„P 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards._; 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, comolete the f'Orm on the next page. CERTIFiariON: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and' in, ` the attached exhibits present the data and information re initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that. the facts,estatements,±•` and information presented are true and correct to the best of my kngwledge',nd;* ,. belief. I further understand that additional information may be regui:red to �` be sOmitteo 'before an adequate evaluation can be made n Planznq; Division. j ,ay , e` Oat Signature Title y w , _�° ( RESIDENTIAL CONSTRU&ION . > The following information should be. Planning Qivision in the of .order to aid school district ability to accommodate• the proposed residential n assessing athagr t development. required to secure fetters from the school, district for increased number of students ',Developers, accormodating are the" ~ prior to" issuance of'buildang- ?ermts. Name of Developer and Tentatfi!ue;Tract No.; -- �" Specific Location of Pr63ecty''? t � PHASE I `RASE Z PHkSE'3' PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number' of single famii u its: �' n ?' t , ?. Number of multiple family units: •: 3. Days: proposed to begin construction: 4. Earl'?est date or Occupancy: r z{. ` Model's %r and # Of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Rarae', va' _ - ----- 1 k 'S1 �yP . + .3 f � °RESOLUTION NU. � �•., A RESOLUTION tF `THE:PGANNIyGLCOMMI "SSI.ON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA; APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER a 9180 (TENTATIVE :,PARCEL,.MAP NO`. 9180) "LOCATEDt�.SOUTH OF NINTH STREET, ON THE WEST SINE' OF HELLMAN AVIiNUE (APN 209 - 01344) t WHEREAS, t. "�,j'entative Parcel Map Number- 9180, submitted by Landco Financial Corpora-0'01 r and consisting ,of= 3 parcels, la2aied ,00 feet' south of Ninth Street on the, 0a side o_f Hellman_Ay n'qe, beiny_a <davis�.nn- of,'a7norfiian - - yr Lot 7 of A plat of'-'a subdivfs1'on -' of Lct 10, Cucamonga.Vi*.mrd -Tract; "as ; per ; ;nab+ recorded in ad`ok 20; page „44 of maP'ffo Kati Bern& 66 County, • Cali1,grnia; and WHEREAS, an F Mdy 8, "s X85; a formal application was ' sdibinitted requesting q sting review of ..re,. above- descri bed '`Tentative:Map ,;and WHEREAS, on February '29, 1986,° the Planning ;Commission held .a duly advertised public hearing for the ° above = described map. NOW, THEREFORc, i8E 'CUCAMONGA ° RANCHO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: = SECTION 1: That the following findings have 'been 'h,�de: L That the map is consistent with the General Plon.. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable fora the -11 ,? proposed development... 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements Will not cause substantial environmental damage, public, health problems or ,have adverse aFfects "oft abq,:ting <t property. r SECTION 2 That this project will not create significt0t adverse, r en,:sronmen a�;mpacts and a Negative Declaration is issued A on FebruaN, :?S, 1986. w SECTION 3't That Tentative Parcel Map No. 9180 is approved�s�iiN3ect , the recomr�en%tions of Approval pertaining thereto. : =A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . RECOMMENOED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" LOCATION: 500 feet south of Ninth Street TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO: 9180 t i west side. of Hellman Avenue DATE FILED: riay a 1.985 LEGAL DESCRIPTION;.' A portion• of Lot. 7 of a NUMBER OF 1075 3 subdivision of Lot 104 Cucima'agA Tinevard GROSS ACREAGE: 6.47 Tract, as per map "recorded Jn,BooW 20xapage` ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 2094,1j_24. 44 0— f maps., -San Bernardino County, Cayl,irfornia DEVELOPER OWNER' ENGINEER /,SURVEYOR landco Financial Corp. Same °` Associated Engineers f 150 S. E1 Molino Ste.101 316 East "E" Street `k Pasadena, CA 91101 Ontario: CA '91761 Improvement and dedico: ion requirement . in accordance with Title 16 of` the= Municipal Code of 'camonga includQ, but'may not be limited the city of Rancho Cu to, the following: A. Dedications and Vehicular Access Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way _ and all necessary easements as -shown on the tentative map. _X 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: t so feet on Lion Street additional feet on additional' feet on 3 rdrner property line radius wiil, be required per ;Cgty Skandards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress sha11 bda 'dedicated i, k as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreemertts,,ensq` access to, all,.parcels and joint maintenance of a l commo ' roads,, ,drives or parkin'j Fareas shall tie provided�'by'`C�C�& � s and shall be recorded concurrent wiah- -the map.{ ,,. 1. ,> r 7 X 6:) All "existing easements lying within future right -of -way are,zo be quitclaimed or delineated on the ma requirements. P per City Engi'neer's . 7-- Easements: "for,4�idewalk for public use shali be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private, ' property. B. Street 2mproveaients` Pursuant to the City 'of Ranch Cucamonga' Municipal Code,n ; Ti. tle ,16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and, port, security with the City guaranteeing the°.r- egu.ired construction prior to recordation o -the inap and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct. full street improvements including, but not limited to, - ;curb• -and, gutter, Arc. pavement; sidewalk; di ive;:approaches; parkway tree "s'and street; lights on all interi'oi 'streets. 2. A minimum, of 26-foot.-wile pavement Within a 40 -foot -wide `dedicated right- of-way shall be _constructed for ,all half 3 section streets.' X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Curb & A.C. Side Drive Street Street A, Min: Street Name Gutter Pvmt, Walk Appr Trees. Lights Overlay Islam_. Other 7 " Hellman Avenue X Xri -; Lion' Street X X X .f X X *Inclu3es landscaping and irrigation on meter` a X 4. Prior to any work beinT performed in the publi: right -of -way," \ fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained �V from the City Engineer's •Office, in addition, to any pother permits required. X- 5. Street- improvement plans shall be prepared by a- 'Registered Civil Engineer.;od approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles . or other existi ublir- utilities as necessary, , p- 7. Existing i t,,`es. - 12Kf or less .fronting the property shall, be undergrounaud. X 8. Install appropriate street, name signs,, traffic control signs r striping and markings with locations and typea ppro edit' they City Engineer. y ^Y, S L, I, _ X 9. street It �ht Tpcations, as required, are to be-Approved Sob thernCat'fornl�a Ed�son...Company _;and the -City -of� ancho' Cucamonga♦ Lights " sfiall be on decorative poles ` wtt"h underground service. X 10 Landscape and z'r°rigation plans syail" b` ' e submitted'. to and Approved' ,by, tM,,! Olsanning Division prior to the+: ssuande `of buff l di ng ;,perms t. . , X 11, Concentrated, drainage ` flowg`:W shall not cross sidewalks Ali Undersidewa,Tk'dratns shat i be installed to City Standards. t t C. Surety: F' K �£ J� y § R'� n+Y X I, Surety sh�0. be, pasted and�`aa Pagreement executed to tits ' 11 satasfacto ofd the F City ;Engineer and.; Ciyty Pt�itai ^nay, guarante��'ticompleton of tie npul'c ttnprovements prier to ` • reco dQon Hof ' the Final (4ap ; for Y,-. ons Street , and, prior to .� xr: bu:ldtng p�ermtt issuanm for,Nellman Avenue ;. P , k *m, 2: Alien agreement ;,lust be executed prior to-.,: ding` of` -the map a for tP�e fo,�lowng'° S. ,Surety shad1 be posted.ane` an a reemee�t executed ; EA ,guaranteeing, copletion.: o4f< a�jl on�stte �drainagefiac�tlitesk necessary "for dewater?ng aTj darcealFs io the satsfaction of tide Building and y Safey Dt4vlso�k Priori to r- ecord4i'ng for .yam " p> •» :and /or prior to issuance, <of"`build�ng'Fermtt; or, ,s D. Draina a and "Flood Control 1. Private£ drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be'' "I required 4and t loll Le, ddl-4neated or ,noticed, prt the' filial map. i • �. �.S K 2. Adequate provtsions6shal' be made. for acceptance, and dj t ;t of sur`:face'dratdage enter "ring the property frm` adjacent'ar „easa "i ` 3. The following storm, drain shall be instal °1Qd to "the satisfaction of'the Ofty`,Lngineer � r ♦' 4. Prior to recordation 'of the. map, a' hydrologic 'aridt drainage study far the project" shalT;tbe submitted to` the Cat<t for .review. '} y Engjtne`e S. A drainage deter }ton basin "per City Standards "shall : bed°. . constructed to detain increased runoff d`, � •"'fir ,J h 't s s 4'i �w r 711 r ' r �1 E. Grading X Grading of the subject property shall be,in: accordance with the Uniforffi: Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. . The final grading "plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a, qualified engineer g licensed by the State, of California-to perform such work prior i to issuance of building permit. 0 ji 3. A geological report shall be prepared by 'a qualified,-6n gineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application 'or grading plan check. i 4. The-,fina1-- grading plan -shall be 'subject to. review and app�.o;tal by the Grading ,Committee and shall be•tcompl'eted, prior to recordation, of the final, subdivision map or issuance of ' building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for, each parcel are to be submitted to title Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building,per"mit F. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits. from other,agencies will be required as follows- CalT ars for San Bernardi no, County F1ood,Control District. -- X Cucamonga County,141 ter District for sewer and water X San Bernardino County ,Dust Abatement (required "prior :to issuance of a grading permit) Other " N 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Kestrictions (C.C. &R..$) appeaved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation } of the-map. 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water,, electric. power, as and telephone �.: 9 p prior- to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance, is required. .r= 5. This subdivision, shall be subject to conditiojis .of, approyai from CalTrans /Sai,�Bernardino County Flood 'control- District.:' 4 ~ X 6. Approvals have rafit been secured from all „utilities and at; er interested agen pS involved. Approval of the', final be subject to any rea•.;cements that. may be received from ifem.` r 4 ..' k, .' .?,• - ..iii: __., .,,& t, �. ..:... # X 7. The -ling Mnf the ; entat ve map nr approval 'of same does ;not guarantee that, sevic, treatment caps ~i*v will be available., at t r the time ;tLaldin pemYcs -are requeste3;r'' ;ihen`buri "di`ng perms' s _ " ,..re, ested, the' ° Cucamonga County Water' Ristri ct will .be as�ed to certaify, the availability of capacity Permits will . not .be �SSUed unless said certif ?cation is recO Owed i p>, R writing. 8. Leal end Ma user Planned Trails shall oe provid d_in accordance. f with,til rail Plan. A detailed trail -plan in �cating�,sridths, "? maximum s7,'opes; physical:condit : ons, fencing an& we6d control, in accordance17witl Ci�y trail standards, shallbe submitted:'to and ` approved 6y th'e City Planner prior to recordation for` and /or =prior to build <.ng ipermit 1 ' issvnce for 9. Pr- to ^cord�irlg, �& depo�l' .hall he posted �,�Z�t[ :.the City covering -;tlzp estitnatei .:cost hf apportioning the assessments `under AssE5 'tment..District'82- 1,'at�ong the newly created parcels: X 10. At the time offnai ` map subnitta'l, ': the. vfollowing shall be submitted Tithe Report, traverse calFuiatidns '(sheets), copies of `recorded maps and deeds !jsed as reference and /or .. , showing origlnal' land division, tie notes; and bench marks , *' referenced`.` X 11. Notice of 'intent to join the'•proposed''Median Lsland Landscape A District: shall' be filed, with the -'City ,,Gouncil prior to recordation of the Final: Map. 9. Special'Condi ,tionr X I. ,An offer of dedication to the City for a 65 foot`wi.de drainage easement in line with the"existing easement on the Olmperty to '`the ;north shalt be provided over Parcel 2. Then easement coul'd� be riduced im width upon the installation o? t,a drainage fact iity within the ease.ent as ;approved by the t;ity.Engineer. i! rl _ X._ Heilman Avenue is subject to flooding, therefore, flood protection measures will be required .For development of, Parcel �. 3. A-flood report substantiating those measures ,will : be required and shall be approved by the City Eng;neer..; X 3. A minimum 15 foot wide drainage easement along -, -the sohth bou7-!ary of Parcel 2 for drainage from Lion Stree shall, be 'v prov tled. , X 4. An emergency al.,weather access from 4Parcel 3 toFLi'on Sfreet over Parcel' 2 shall be provided upon developments of Zither Parcels, 2 or 3. A minimum 20 foot `wide easement4for this' purpose " shall be shown on the final Map. *� r Al ' � Iii ANIL �i ti r j r yy , Y" I I k RA 97;`s: cnx aF wUiCHacvcnoNSA LL -0Yo'b t1UB8S; CIRIE GIN V . t� 4 b 5. Lion =Street shall be` constructed prior to occupancy , of. - any 'of t X 6 6. Toe °applicant -shal`1 -pay prior-to 7ssuartceof`butldtn p p-rqttn on Parcel Y'3 a;K,fee in -lileu of Undprgrounding the overhead utilstres along Htfiman- Avenue, 'said 'fee shall be. one -half cf the front foot cost'of underground'ng for the project frontage`on Hel7rnan Avenue T Y p, -- CITY',OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STF � 'FPnRT" 0 , p O. U. a DATE: February 26, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, Assistant `Planner y SUBJECT: ENVIRONMEiiTAL ASSESSMFNY AND�ENTATIVE TRACT 12420 - RANCHO PARK: VILLAS, - The development of 110 single family -attached units on 14 ?',acres of land in the Low Medium Residential District W-8 do' /ac)' at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue:- APN 209- 161 -04, 05, and 06. I PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: a A. Action Requested: Approval of s- bdivision, site plan elevations and issuance of a Neaative liclaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Vacant, Industrial Area Specific, Subarea 3. South - Existing Santa Fe Railroad, tow Medium Residential R-8 du /ac). East - Existing single - family residential, LoH,Resident al (2 -4 du /ac);. West Existing Santa Fe Railroad:,. Low Residential (2' -4 ' Co. du /ac).. C. General Plan,Designations: Project Site - Low Medium Residential (C -8 du " " /ac) North - Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 3. South- - Low Meoium,'Residential (4 -8 `du /ac). East - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac); West - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). D., Site Characteristics: Tha project s to is iocated adjacent to Ef ucamonga Creek Channel and has a tr'augular' lot configuration t` with a slope approximately 3% from north to south. PCesertly,_; the site is vacant with a .cure Eucalyptus windf�aw ''that' X traverses the site fram north to south, six (6) mature 'aim r tress along, Hellman Avenue and some- mature Eucalyptus trees', scattered, throughout the subject site (see Exhibit s ,� ITEM C PUNNING COMMISSION .STAFF REPORT TT 12420 - RANCHO PARK VILLAS February 26 1986 Page 2 a II. ANALYSIS: ' A. - General: The proposed development comprises three (3) phases and consists of 110 single - family attached units (7.7 du,Oac) �. along ,an internal circulation loop. Welling units are arranged around.-,motor courts (see Exhibit "D"). or. the western > portion of the ,'bite plan, several courts extend ir.to the 'entralized open''space ,area with 'duelling units clustered on 5oth sides of the driveways, The development provides 'a good distribution and guest parking with 59 stalls spread throughout the project site. The project will be serviced by three (3) points• of entry with - security gates. -The Itiain entry along Hellman Avenu' ris slated to be cor. =.eructed in the first p, ;se �i. At the extreme northwest corner of the s7r`r an "out parcel (.8 acres) exists contiguous to the project boundary. Staff .directed the _applicant to master -plan this parcel so that suture residential development is feasible and would integrate with the project proposal (see Exhibit "B "). However, due to .' the gated entry concept of the project, no reciprocal access Will be required. Instead, "Out" parcel will be serviced by s6parate driveway. B. Ccsi� r �n Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project on several occasions during, which major revisions were requested to the site plan for,,better building' orientation to open space area. The committee reviewed the revised site plan and recommended approval subject to: landscaping pockets with etergreen tree types next to garage doors, rive foot minimum landscape area from curb face to private perimeter fencing, and re- designing chimneys from masonite siding to stucco exterior. :.n addition, the Committee recommended elevations' that the .recreational building elevations should reflect architectural elements of dweiling units and also directed the applicant to provide design details of all fencing including recreational areas and private open space. The applicant made recommended revisions to his development plans;; C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee recommended turf ° block. in variaus areas for access of firefighting trucks (see Exhibit 'D "). In addition, the Committee recmiviinded that at such tine thatt,,flood improvements are made to Hel:man Avenue s the 6th ,Street entry will revert back to secondary emergency entry only, with knox box and-" Lastly, 'the Committed rec66rended undargraunding of all overhead utility ,;l;ines (except 66 K.Y. 6r -larger electrical li,nel). No '6v,.e ead utilities exist fronting, project on Hellman Avenue, howP lines do exist on the opposar,q side fronting Hellman AuEnue•.�" .` JJ } ¢_ V r PLANNING COMMISSI—iNYSTAFF REPORT TT 12420 - RANCHO PARK VILLAS February 26, 1986 4, Page 3 AWL v It is recommended that the applicant be required to pay an in lieu fee equivalent to one -half of the established cost of undergrour-ling the opposing lines the length of the project. On 6th Street, there ark; two poles, along the project frontage which carry both 66 K.11. and 12 K.V. and overhe�;d telephone lines on the opposite side of 6th Street. It is recommended that the applicant pay an in -lieu fee equivalent, to cne -half of the established cost of undergrounding the 12 K.V. fine and the telephone line across the streetJhe applicant ;agreed with all of the Committee's recommendations. 0. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial, Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed 'Fart II of the Environmental- Checklist and found no significant adverse I impacts on the environment as a result of this project. However, due to site plan configuration and driveway alignment, the applicant has filed a_ tree removal permit which indicates ,. removal of a mature Eucalyptus windrow, six (6) mature Palm trees along Hellman Avenue, and some mature Eucalyptus trees on the project site. As - mitigation, staff is vequiring AM replacement trees on a one to one basis of 15 gallon size ' Spotted Gum (Eucalyptus Malculatta) and also recommending that "_ --. the six (6) mature Palm trees be saved and re- located elsewhere on the project site (see Resolution Conditions #13). If the Commission concurs with said findings,, then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on the t�ttached resolution are supported by the follo-1,ng facts: 1. The project site -is adequate in size and shape to accomodate the development aid the mposed residential uses are in accordance with objectives of the General Plat; and Developme , Code. 'k._ R, 2. The proposed site plan, in conjunction with Conditions of Approval, U consistent with the current Development Standards of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspapers the property posted and notices were sent to all property owners within'300' of the subject site. `Y V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission 3 conduct L public hearing to consider public input and elements of this project. If af#, such consiceration, the Commission concur'.; with the Facts for Fs Zings and recommended Conditions of Approral?, adoption of the at ,shed Resolution and issuance of a Negative, *° Declaration would 5e appropriate: e tin: ` •. - A inn M 7' -' ^ PLANN NG to ISST OM! STAFF TT 1c420 - RANCHO PARK YI(,l:AS _ a Februry Go, 2486 � Page 4 � RABler City Planner BB-.HF:ko I r 'X Attachments: Exhibit `=A" L0cation',`Map Exhibit "B" - Site Uti I ization Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan � Exhibi`t "D" - 'Landscap.ing Plan Exhibit HE" Elevations Exhibit "F'4 Entry and Directory Sign Details Exhibit -::G" �- Grading Plan Exhibit "H" - Notor'- Court Detail's { Exhibit "I" - -Rec. Building Elevations & Floo"r Plan J � Part II of the Initial Study E Resolution of Approval with'Conditio' x -� A MGM G I .r �..nz.....,.' LM 1 M FC •.��; � f (� t 3 M 3 t L `, _c weir ®e• ®area ETc ■ ®s■ GIall t ■ t :� M LM€ C TJ ' i Fyn 4. I■ no ' • , i.S.P Eq NI �' r j 47 Tee per NURTH , J `1[ ray �' i s P ■3� ? Y 'EXHBLS;. - -XL- . Y r R t ppry r [� ° { lLLi1t'9 FZAAl I'll CQfNERAL IMOU -MIAC 46MENAL, yMCUSTR1ALJ � • ' ;.,1 - ..., °rte -'�' arweo ' mm � 1 o, _ J ro 11 -. A : . o ,� c � ; � _ y(i ek C ;roc �sr. p - aesnryit�b. l ¢- L°WMEi,tUl' 1N,'7U9MIAL I IRK NaRTt-i w CITY Or, RANCF { t I.E:.,�'6�,,�,r�'i.gr93G_ L�, EKHirsrrA ..� wwm �L a ��8 Pmsr;.y PHASE[ 'r 1 3 4ENTH STRI'ET akTA Ot7 O O •�, C,© ,1L�. ,� ; lJ� i�. I L•. U ©. 1 6{D0 fiY'8T p �Q l'.L.E lia lag !a >'e U.,Fi,2 -24a $] ,,J i I q , •�1pt ({,'1>HrG 146.600 24 :_ ' Cl 4%. *.. �� :sEiingEOlr.. ..n.126 [23 /puj ?axamb.' �.[s3 (carom DENSITY .:qos~ +Ggtis .aD�.,.,.,. ?, is :: / d ?, l•J C er=+'i !� z NET "S so Una OMM s ' : H Y STOAT so, .] PHASE I SsT�Of,1r ,ao• T L t/�,. --jl ' =tom• PHAS'c Ii .40 , ��. �- PHAX S. s' ' � ` yI I J...'.•11�f � `l: • •� �1�r^ _ it?.FY 1 E 440✓ a160Mag .j C01i110N AREAET Qo' I` Ili i j f� srX ^� tF wEa 7Anxu1 1'ORTH' 7 VH T TITLE :,._••�...L�'; �1 •` `r L° t�1`1I IIR DI�rLSip,,� , ! EXHIBIT- OCA SEVENTH STR� EE App Y `p C�4Cjj t T �• 3 _ r Al. r , Jscui. 4a0 JF I, ..s.�..".'.- ao�w Y +[ �� ♦ Ht_�.nti. —� }_iii t� �A �(. � .a P _ u°�,... ? CGS �.J-.Y � 3 —�� • �� Y ��:: + •� #��. `ENTRY— — SIXTH V REET� -� -� IT �EVarz t L•i G�'{1 t -. CAUIONGA a.� T1T11 fls,Q�M' 5 ,�Hir�T. �, �- J '•,sue ,w���`$i � �i MOTO.CGURT- ENTRY :� ".,r,'T' �t � ,^ ELEVATION nn• awnu x��.p i .0 .„ 3UILDIN6 SIDE ELEVA ON V. . - • 7-7 i— - - ri ! b I TW FTOpY PLAN -'SIDE ELEVATION rncc_M+ W SJJGLE STORY PLAN - SIDE ELEVATION - f �w. •ss � .aA � _ 4to tu�o ^ . r--; fit! iil'fif,prrm� r�� � �•�.,...,� -�, ••�i LI!�11�I,uuul!Il�: •a. j1 `H , _�- E _ Vl tibl qq i `„ �� -ice ...`•:� -' � .., ,- ��:.,� -ROM NELiMAAfj u. t\'Op,-TH •+ s CIT y� or .�' RANCHO CLr�� \TEA �j ��t: �:r-ra a, PLtVIIr,'G �p TlTLE`G�lasyArt!'. :. TV3IQI E<CHII3[T- ° 4 SCALS- j �d�n ru IlSfr.6 `•M.sm 'i t• — _` y`' Pommy 1 �� COMA " UII III 7 I J I I i r I` ��f �cro..1 Yom. Aeiwa+xf.°i UW�. � +196 rwra.•Rnio I.w�•�� -... w1. 4r.1•ltti llr�L1 y Ids • � ==-- -r T `r I �� �' '� - �— -- - N! !li!lUllilll I! I !�I I I ��' • e I �� • .. ' arx�... nw�w.t_nosrso m.a.q...;t, I �. I IIri117• ''ll }I! Ilf,�..••. t `'� !1!� p MR. ,rlk • \ `�CF 11 \l�A Q �TLCll\TCA �.1 F6irNI\ ?G Q SI C I y Lr , _ - ` y „ . SCALE- 4i� �.y✓� &ri�3`a2,� a:.. `I.�hVu."�''z.e7_ �Y':_'w !6 _''� :;I I �.. . � ,. L.�M� .�4'�9�'Pt F � ice+• i `�4t�— • +' J� _ .gym � � _ , 7= W-I ELEVATION l r , k .. 7t Iii �lillll °. � " . �� 'j- ♦aaf a III�� � � uSt.� « .... 1 „t� ” r, i .. r 1ii17aN� I ,�:• "' IIII�iIItl9RIlE ' dl 1 I v.r �t i # LDIPIG RECREATION 13UI ' I ri u I SQUARE FOOTAGE: LOUNGE. J68C ,�* KITJHEN MEN. ..212 ik..• WOMEN _ 3 I.. _...i — 312 ;.TAI' 860 3r p4tkw FLOOa PLAN 7r'�.: z 1NUZa H' CITY CRI - [Zl�d ' �: l��i�, c r i� p �^ TITLEI--- ���'sr�� P 4I I t iv-1slam, FOCI Ii�3lT:. �' •� .. = Y 1 �� i _ . t "���' _�.• t 9LEVAT16N. AT CC NTR OL :+�1•yr,1 •ASC •are a ♦K. —�I y� wr 9. •. _•� • •a�•� -FT�LV ATOM 4i LNTRANCL 9•T .'RA TlCE DES iGN- $E`1ENTH STREET �~— .v— SYsi�=�r b'�a'Ltir +• ,s...:".w'.,,...r,,,.,,.,�r � . W � � y� — - � Y°1"' ti E �� ,S.I Sr' iCI ......w '- �l i •. � ,.... � �i - .riCat •.•neox ZVVIT*R .f Al ENTRANCE - JESFGn•- ..r1E1'�Mn y: �. AE! iL VEMT.I 3T`:LP OES.4. •OR -r HCAL' YoTaS AMC SPECIFICATIONS — CITY OF �. AI4H0 i;L!.�AMG TGA ALtiTVNINIC+'.-jis✓�.��IQz�,1 �! �. �r _ 1�•� >. �YITI3Ci = —' SCALE /NAYr/RZ Rum MIA ., ` al (ti•-i .J' i . i -25 i s - -1w 9. i ^.� y � r `~ . � ( �"C`+I.,� \ j /••� I :6' `7`. t.. {s, .J.. •'k • •; �cp. ^::7i �i �+`t..e T t ' � �:•L r f� `art t NnRTH r l \� $ \' • _ �_, �: lttl r:ztl ii! i t. lee �0 TI i'LCi yi ��� b `1 '1, dN t f '�. `' �%' '� • V `�-•. is ! t f ` EXHIBIT= SCALE \ �/ �` . s (� •: r � CITY OF A X�.3 = CLCAIC'� \rGh 2 GAR GAR' Ty -AL -%-,W 1-71 T[i I A-s �i- C55 crry'OF w. � �, � I � �� � 1 � �„, .yip �`• _ •. "� Ir Y y f '� t r i i � j t, i tj Y j f. gee lk i � :> � , •.� .., � aft �i` -- see • f � '. t ` � •�i � .r �.�� j4 j1- j - ti � ��• f�i i .. z: 4NORT14 CITY ' OF ITE\ I CUOTCiA TITI.1:= yy' PL �I�jNil ` ' CIVISU�t EXI ilI31T- � ,' SCALI : Am--- ° — $ 1 7 ¢s :_ CITY OF 'RA.` cTio CUC.t�fOAGA . PART IT - INITIAL STuny e � 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: >ge APP�I= -r �• 3"' / =r�Psa %Cis e FILING baTE: LOG WMER: PROJECT:' ~• y E- PROJECT LOCATION: 1t/`fj� QyL' �i,rX ST�26 T' ��• An/l� J7�LG'o.7.at! rQU.E; I. EIMPOnIENTAL IMPACTS _ i (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe "answers are required on attached sheets). 1� , �``` 1• Soils YES S:L�YBE NO - and Geology • Will the proposal have ' significant results in Unstable ground conditions or in changes In geologic relationships? b. Disruptions,, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? C. ,Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d• The destruction, covering or modification+ of any unique ;geologic or physical feature's? e. Any Potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? Changes in erosion 'iiltat on, or deposition? g• Exposure of, le or eoo geologic p property to eolo ie hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, u . mud- slides, ground failure, cr` similar hazards ?. r / x s, h. An iarzease in the 'rate of extzaction and or use of ,ry mineral resource? s - Z iiYdiralaev; Will the ifropasal have signs =`scant .. A fi resuit : A '..W` w . Yag "�; `. YES E34YBE \a ' a Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, v Fiver' or ephemeral stream channels': � � s b. Chznges in absorption rates., drainage patterns, or the rate .and amount of .• trface water runoff? C. Alterations to the cou rse or flow of flood " waters? ' Change�rin the .amount of surfaca watei In any body r,f water? r e. 'Discharj jj into surface wacers, or any alteration of surface Water quality ?" ^' f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? ,, g•. Change in the quantity of groundvaters, either through direct additions or with - drawals, or through iuterfererca. with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? n. The reduction in the amount of water cIi' ei- wise available for .public grater supplies? `. Exposure of people or property:to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches2 j 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have s3gni icai rea"ats in: a. Constant, or periodic; air emissions from mobile `; or indirect source,�J' Stationary sources? --- b. DetiYioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment - +f applicable, ,'ir quality standard;.? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic ` conditions; affecting air movement, moistt;,`� or smperatil��'.? , G. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results , ' a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribtttion, car nember =� of any species .of plants? •� ; ' V 'tedt %tt = of the numbe :. of,any unique, rar' , . - 6r endaange-., d species'''of plants? . .. t YES 'Ilk ?t0 } c. ZntroduC; ion of new or disruptive species of -- ,. p'_ants into an .area? d. Reduction in the poten'tal fr)r agr, cultural ' production? - Fauna. _,'Will t;.e proposal'have significant results in: . a- Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or`bumbers Of zny species of animals?, b. Reduction of the numbers Of any unique, rare _ or endangered species of animals? v% a c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals'; d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or ' :+ 'Wildlife habitat! 5, i'onulation. Will the Proposal, have significant V results in: a. Will the proposal alter tha location, distri- button, density, diversity, or growth rate of ehe human.populatien of an area? b. Will the pr'24"al: affect existing housing, ; r A create a dare :a i for additional housing. ? , ; ' b. Socio- Economic Factarrs. Will the proposal have significant results t-%: a. Change im L3ca.1 or regional socio- ecancmic characteristics, - including economic or cot=ercial dives val ties? j44 tax rate . and property b, Will.yroject costs be e uitaisly distributed c ambns Pvojet., t I.e., buyers, tax payers oµ �tj�ject usFXS? 7. Land Use and Planning Consi�:eratiors. W111 the ?� proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present o^ J planners land use of an arQ:a? b A conflict vi?h aiy designations policies, or aioptad plans of :Al object iv cnt'.ties? y governmental kk' -npact upon t%a qu3aity or quantity of existing consum6tive opr non - consumptive A ` 4 rec eationaal . oppartur ties? ?e 3 .I ae T Page' "4a i5 "1 YES �rkY?� NO . 8. Transnorwation. Will the - --- or • at ._- proposal have significant { results -in- a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular'"/ movement? /f ` b. Effects on existing streets, or demand frnr N . new street construe Lion. v `. c. Effects on existing g parking facilities, or demand for Uew parking? "` d. Substantial "im Lion systems? pact upon existing transporta- e. Alterations to present patterns.'of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f., Alterations to or effects on present and potential water -borne, mail, mass'transt or 1 air traffi g. Increases in,3raffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? k 9. Cultural Resou=es. Will the proposal have ; significant results ine -; K a. A disturbance to the integrity of ,archaeological, I'aleOntalogical, and /or historical resources? 1Q. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the _ proposal .lave significant -results in; ; a. Creation of any health hazard or potsntia 1 health hazard? + / V b. Exposure of people to potential, health hazards? YL -_� 4 c. A risk of exploaion or release of ` hazardous ; substances in the event of an acct ;enit? p3 d. An increase in the 'number of individuals -• *. ' or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such '? organisma l e. Increase in exist4 -g noise levels _ Y f. Exposure of people to potentiJ,ly dangerous noise levels. g. The creation of objectionable odors? -_- F _ h. An incraase in light or glare? . t r j.. Page S ' Y. L3YBi; NO 11. Aesthetics. a tics. Will the proposal have significant �, results 13: _ ".; a. The obst'acton oe degradatian of an y scenic '! vista or view? be The creation of an aesthetically offensive ' site? J : 1 C_ A, conflict with the objective of designatee Or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Rublic Services. Will the proposal have -lIC a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following; a. Elect=3e power ?" b. Natural or packaged; gas ?, c. Commur; ;cations systems? d.. rater supply ?' t. e. Wastewater' facilities? j f. Flood control structs4r`es ?: f > g.' Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? i. Police protection? 3• Schools? k• Parks or other recreational facilities? '� r a r 1. Maintanance of public facilities; including rands and flood control facilities? M- Other governmental services? ` 13. Enerer and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have ' sign Lcanc results in; $, ., a. Use af'substantial or excessive fuel or energy? wb. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development; of new sources of energy? w d. An increa,er'o= p r'petuation of'the consumption non - renewable forms ok ener f gY. 'when feasible -a >> " - renewable sources of energy w µ re. available? y *'« •a: 7 a Y.ES:, YAYSE substantial: depletion of ; }nY nanrenewable scarce natural resources ?. - -_ 14. Mandato � - ry Find f ,SQnifi '' - - cance. a. Does the project have the the Potential.to degrade' quality of the,;envronmeni, substantially red:1ca thehabitai of ftsfi or wildlife species., cause a +fish'or wildlife papuiatbp to dro p . 4. below self sustaining levels, threaten ;to eliminate lant or,animal commt;ity, reduce the number or restrict_:the_ran�'erof a A rer or -` endangere$ p7 ant o; animalwoi eliminate 1's4Miaisiory 4or pehistory ?ersods of r . +; b. Does the prolect-,h4kVe the potent=ial ,to achieve , short -term, to the .disadvantage« of long -leaf, environmental rgoal § ?(�A,shart -term• impact on the environments is one,wrich' occurs in a relstively brief, def3nikive.period of time. while Long- term im pacts -- .will.. endure. well into the future) 4 C. Does the project Lave impact which are �Y 1 indiv duslimited, but= cumulat vely considerabli>.? (Cumulatively considerable' means tha* tltie incremental `effects of an individual pr�Oject arerconsiddi;able when .viewed- w in connectio:i with the effects• of ,past pr`ojects,; and probable future protects) d. Does the project havenvironmental effects _ which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,•,.either..dir,ecily or indirectly,? e II. DISCU SION bF ENtTIRONMENTAE ,EVALUAIrion (i.e., of affirmative answers• to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed „mitigation measures)., LLIF r i WWI W""h ;p,.� �"rvC• ;?g�r7. ..e �"",..a: S• '"�3�.e i�� 4 RMF ,w b.) Grad"ino for ;pro7ect proposed will cause disruption and displacement of top soi.l_, J�owever tFie _ entre- _grading (cherUf. will he- rev9QYted.by,, BuiI ing . & Safiety Department for, consistence with - Cityts;. Grading . Ordinance.; •' k 4 2b.) Project propos;all wall increase. impervious surfaces -that will create additional surface,, vine off'.. All aspects of drainage will be under the direq(ci'on '(see o ,,ithe City, 'Engineer 12F1 : r. 2I.) The project's rt e i comp'l`etely, protected from flooding througMfl "ood a ; walls and :othe'r measures requ.iredi 'by, the' En' -`__ er ng Dep'artn;ent. r^ However, in`ress° °and a Tess to,..tiie reject from 7th Street a He=llrian m-.. `Avenue, wil9 expose people to periodic fldooing during 'periotls of ' extensive rains The only .1 01ht of ingref� and egress „dur- ing..rainy periods is 6th Street headipg,�n'a° esterly ,directi6h r 4.a,) The applicant is pp p$ropos�ng to remove" )nature grove of Eucal,yptus . trees, ;., � 'Permit which w�iFl require a.yiree Re and extensive .re= � 1*6' planting in kind a`sap�ropr ate miaigatirf. 8a.b.) project proposal will create 'additj(onal vehicular movement, which wi wily require new street constructio (along, "'th Street adjacent to north project boundaryfto 10 "f beyond ,&.ttterline of 7th Street, 12a.) Project will be conditioned to. undergrou,�O :all existing, overhead utilities fronti%d,q"Iman Avenue and 6th Street (except for 05 K.V. i, and larger electrical l;ines). -" )� .� 12f.) Devej,%O rs will be' conditioned to construct Hehlnan "Avenue as o major water carry ng� street° requiring, a, combinatidn of special; curb heights, commerc -6if tyge' drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection Wa11s, sand /or _landscaped earth beriiis ',and., rolled driveways at',lroperty lines. s - s & 1 a V'4t. �v{ r A i4f r fit•, III. DET. - Nr;7ATION NN r On the basis of this• initial eyaluatie ^.: � a 1Z 2 find the propose.i projeht COULD kT have a aigni scant effect e on the environment,, and a- ?r'ECATIVE•DE(;LARATION will be prepared. I find that,'although the proposed project Could have a significant LJeffect on.`the environment, there � will not be a significai:t effect in thi 's ,case b'ec`ause tiia;mtigatian. measures described; on `an ; attached sheet have bei:n add "ed to the.project. A NFCATIL� DECLARATION WILL,BE =PR:iPAREll. ' I find the proposed project %iVY have .a significant effect on.;th-�• j envir=ent L_1 , and an EY/1IR9Y4IT LSPACT REPORT is required. Date Si n_'atuce r,. T ,tie ' e c ; 1N'R: C . ELF ti+�a y ^ �T ' G €1'"'« y'F yYr,.; agar. - f^ ar ; ,3 "„•'FS'^ r. , `�I` RESOLUTION ND. ? i� # A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA, CALIFOROIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12420 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12420 hereinafter "Map" subs�ittd by •w Fat Favorite, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing th'.J real;fprr�perty situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino St hie of California, described as the development of 110 .'ingle family attached units; on 14.3" acres of 'land in. -the Low Medium Residential DYsiii`ct (4 -8, rier /ac }�, '. located at the northwest Corner of 5th Street and- lie1lman Avenue ''into 119 lots, regularly came before ,thIe ,'P1ann'ing Comm*—` " for public, hearing and'. action on February 26, 1986; and'' WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subjectp to all conditions set forth ill i the Engineering Land Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning 'Division's. reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. k. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as.-`allows SECTION 1: The Planning Commission mi <es the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12420 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent i!ith the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans, sr (b) The design or improvements 'of the tentative tract is consistent with•the General Plan, Development Code, ' and specific plans; (c) The siteuis physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damcge and . avoidable injury; to human:; and wildlife or their habitat { (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious = public health problems; •„ (f) 'Their design of the tentative tract, will not conflict 1 _ with any easement acquired by the public at large., 3 ` now .of record, for access through or use of the property Within the proposed subdivision��gf< g H { e'2N 01 I� R 'iwx ��V• t3 � >" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION ;..; TT 12420 -.RANCHO PARK VILLAS ;�• February 26, 1986 _ Pag3 2 (g) :That this project will not create adverse impacts on t), environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: 'Tentative Tract Map No. 12420, a copy of which is , attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Design Review: 1. Material sample 'board shall be submitted to. the City Planner, for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits_, 2. All fencing details'and perimeter wall design shall be submitted .to the, tity Planner, for review and' approval prior to issuance of building permits. Any wood fencing shall be water sealed or stained. 8. Special landscaped statement (i.e. `accent trees ` and shrubs, flowering ground- cover, and rockscape treatment) shall be provided at all project entries and at 7th and 4 Hellman and 6th 6`:d Hellman. 4. Security gate details and project directory sign details shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and • "� approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5 All pedestrian linkages into centralized open ,'space shall be 'delineated by accent trees and shrubs.. 6. Final landscaping plan with unifying theme shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval - prior to issuance of building permits. E 7. A decorative perimeter wall -or fence shall be provided along Cucamonga Creek Channel, to the satisfaction: of the City Planner. 8. A. detailed lighting g g plan to :include both high and low ' 1;• level lighting shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. - 9,. Dense landscaping, 15 gallon trees ,(20' on center)" and shrubs shall be provided' along, entire; west property line. 10. 10' wide texturized paving treatment (i.e. brick pavers) across circulation aisle as shown on siie p #1 an shall• be- A provided I1 s'1 it (( G d 3d _v `s. b i i j • PLANNING CO'MMISS.IMI, RESOLUTION l` TT 12420 - RANCHO`PARK.VILLAS February 26, 1986 al Page 3 s i fro fl II. All guest parking spaces sha1T be identified subject to y City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.• - �1 12. Columnar trees /sbrubs shall be planted between' and flanking all garage doors. 13. Six (6) mature Palm trees along Hellman�Ayenue shall be saved and relocated elsewhere within project site, subject to the approval` of a tree removal permit by City j Planner prior to issuance of a rough grading permit. Tentative Tract: 1. The?appiicaq� shall pay an in -lieu fee for undergrounding l existing ov rhead utilities fronting Hellman Avenue and ' 6th 'Street for overhead utility lines (except for 66 K- V. and larger electrical) prior to building permit issuance ' or :tract recordation whichever occurs first. Said. fee shall be one -half the cost" for undergrounding the •. overhead utility lines on Hellman Avenue for the length of the project frontage,. Or, :6th Street, the cost of I undergrounding the overhead utility .lines existing on both sides of the street shall be "combined and the in- lieu fee shall be one -half the combined amount. 2. The access location on 6th Street, although undesirable from a traffic standpoint, is a necessity for this project at this time, •and shail`be constructed with phase I of the project, because both 7th Street and Hellman = Avenue are subject to closure due to flooding.` Upon the future installation of flood protection measures for Hellman Avenue, the 6�,h- Street access shall be removed ; . and replaced with an emergency only access. The project -a CC &Rs shall contain language to insure that this access •. p `� modification is accomplished at the homeowner's expense, at a future date when required by the: city. 3. An access location for the project shall be provided to He'.lman Avenue. The access shall be constructed with the f'. initial phase of development, if it can be so•designed to maintain a flood barrier' alonc�,J'nllnian Avenue, If 'not the project CC &Rs shall costa h language to insurew that this access is constructed at the home'owner's expense, at Y a future date (after flood protection measures have been completed for Heliman Avenue) when required by the'City.: ri Sy Sir f PLANNING "COMMIS i64 RESOLUTI Ott :» TT 12420 - RANCHO P-Mk VILLAS° February 26, 1986, Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO' CUCAMONGA BY: �r f� Dennis L..Stout, Chairman w ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy'SecretarY .I„ Bradi Buller, -D,puty Secretary of the Planning f Commissiclii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do rhereby certify that.the foregoing,Resoliition was duly and regularly, introduced, �passd'd, and adopted by the P�laiin_ing +cormnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the P:lanninj'Commissrion held on the 26th day of February, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: - AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ;. NOES: COMMISSIONERS': ' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: , r 5 '� Sir � � y�, ,a • � r �. • a+� a A.0 ° L A :�: —p �• �'Y^ ft ��d 4EbU ualYq: d •Nd a` 4!] >€ dE �ZL OC i ` L t yy 4 4LL O� Vd v. Z d0 LA 4A�nU qd G� °� h � ° 1 °• >c T� ` 6 r f C •s q y f �' fJ S C � G:� O % Y G O y q pEaO {�.0 C w Vp L4gC d,� ucY V= D t OaY' dY�pA LC GGip 4� _N Zs c 40� Z =E' lip b o4a W V��p...y qG ~Ob E G xYAC 'Oa d�bT f' c w O C � ci 3 �: Crd O L U4 w C QI C G l'a a u. D O dy d V q^ > q G d. ".. "y d Gd./do dam. u ?a N 'a m.ti a �°q • 3L� V-5.1 ;_� ae.K�p �^ uY."p" U �;MN ^ygdw: •�tU .E..p9 NUd OM.p.- 4�Fm vcsuW •-.m" .as > co�°n ew.y°wG u €dx o °1u M- 54 y ^O !Ib ,r EVr uy• fl..R.V r �6YE dfo.Tw CV ^_ EY 1 Y A.•.E Yl�d�N� bq.L qD Of �C 6� yv L d p •°c ago NT Cq ^ .. it c 4wo u Ezg qq Owd6 d'q S O� L9b a do ww^. d 1 U -n,0 d o.G V O. u •y .. O .y L N G G'ftJt np m® Oy 4v 2 w 9 Y +• ti C .O N C. u M O < w� u {+ S 6 0 4 ,6 It k c b d 242 t Novo J EL c Lc R E— W w > Q € T d ppEE E b f �x O° � Ct • °�yL Y-p�a y U T:9 o c V d 4Ay a O� 3 b W t O L it _ L. 6 t ,a N w d Z 9 d ~ LL 4M OF I n G.G. ^y 'F S 4 V d p S IN cM"O V3 E o Ce .Y Y.r.. •• w :. W �. F"• d U N J H N C1 Q N � 3 :N a P T" Myra I ". i�l do a o n^ �dW ouai,. QaL am_ a.i. o.•� -vo t a A y °a N Z. z c4 d >m V OdM N:cn ro L °x Nm C =.0 J 0001wro d U °••. 6 �..EOd V w N g E a N A o wV V d N dS LL 9C w d V «^ OO qw q�. � L S ^O r0N« gC jTL E ^� d. OLO'x� oNOd O >`d^ °�dx 4. Ero « `. L °'^'A O�iN Ud Y4 Nu •'4 •'M 4n�d> yi �Xrd yL Y 4 G O« L �. C.^AC' p N. Y 1 O gS�cp COOq d Cxn L _L •°+ '*'G^ G q V^ L d q C «° vr A y Y..qc ^L S r�Q4 E4 A ro N A •q G Vii. L, G. ro N Y�. d'd v•'oa =r•ui= x N roy C O a TO nr. Y 4.$u uro'°� w•°•n. N °� ue.� u eo�Y.G L'C� r • r � 1 6 NO= a"�euia ���•' .sue ' Nro e• orA.royLU =' <a°. ro:'w N �.'.: rEO L� � dd0 usm nx. uA: r « ^N N q�u• • TaN ro O b d L �d` >.. •y •.YNLO �co 6�I�N =G�. «.= rLy V a « ^M y9 'a L nA w^ of A:yr, O ky OdL wu v pdyg s° o dFi G a aoza�, ..> a• u:a�i «, �T a V rte u «y ° wp.Ga og o °v cm3 m �.x @ r. r d G d EV yOV Y N ;« L ro V rod Y d �u r d>. =o pOV4 E py dG AC w i 6 C u o !E.=+4. 6 p O: w Yd� NN NL ESNYV N. Q.yO. vYix W•OiCV W��j i CLwrd Nr16 O \ ti cT c 49 ON OHO 4 )f. •yOY.Cy- D ro 4v �y ^L O= O4y ro O O��Yr x `LN =d V= ^~ LQ 'emu« aqd Lro AO ooa «o 4YC O Y �_ � r�� 4 Opp S N c S y 1L KO °�'+;,.e i o.� 4r oqE � uo. �'..da �: w. T> T d^ ^.L ro••'°�3'�c^y owe°, ^e�n°d:�u i•- .°e y ^'� N °u< '� =� =0 L .2 OLD•° CL L' U LY o V A >'d •xg' V roNL, V OL L G 9•OU dCtf d E ` 6«c. Lyd w V ^ ¢O�p^ d— ,F �rxi �zY +00 W 'Orr•Q UNO'LV jg o 0 6 0 ° L° cNL � d O q. A d M u 0 ` •V+ C °NK >° LOY Ol '^ V 9. 4 4 q E O N.. A U Y 9�b < u EC1dL i6p0. L.^ 6 L� r ro� =.cO.ro « NC L ar U�c N E a: -Z o-��r� roaLa v�o v dn=.� •e'o Sd ,,, •L, '"6s. �m ...o� °� ^�u ro�NE SI c• x 1�e O d Y ro FF �. 'O O VO, 3.« C d E d L^ V t E d N a W r d L pnL �d Lc O dE O O Lp OO. YY U YpOL6. ' y y <N mi 4. N6 Lam"•""' ML N:ON LY U4 + «NJj N'<.O O OL YL C6s �CE Udn.%Yw dOOM'EO <Y •+Si6d w «qw•. 1"' «y. cn« �ff�:i''4$.�ai 1 ' C-30 1.,' YLi�i3 ',h�riusK`i9PCI��SYiia'"..' __ .., ed•V+�.., t.'NalY�i.. " 000o 1A a 0 Na.aM ° w,d° N of q �c L ' - w q C N G � O N� �'1 a p dYUr y L'� .. +• CIS ^N �K O.. ��. L uM v +.. G O N^O E L C L q A � O ^i _ ,q p0 q0 y..LO dxNp yu TT: •- a7 dgoIn om av . O=q•a L ..S A� • yL �.p OIL diai.4din�. p A �q� G L Z A ^ �'G, O OYN Y.NNa d7 q • ^L NSU Mu�e V. 3..i CJ C a� O D• •n. .-.9UO IYC°1 Up .�. Gp 4pO NO Cy ��° C•O YV~j'C M -'� -^ Sv LS C M.d.¢ QNOILML v N aq N4 dC. ^EYI1 L!3^ ON h �O °ia �L °/ "' °•"•1 �°J vim. sLa .. dac «� d u. rd. •I�1 L, VI pI N �C n Cad C tea.. „ O q L U CL� L p u P,t � =Q ° yO�C tL Y� pT O p�Y00D1 C L N N q N Q N Q N 3 M 0 1L- w S Q N Y OI }•. P A 4 0 Q A .� c a G Y 4. o I`d p N. ^ I II f I C o a O« y.p0 ApC CCOC`6 �.. 'da°•. qay x2 L R 6.'V. U =agya EGGE C 6 0I y x N ° d° 1 y q 0 N t.T C C C N � .UO 2 V Y� w • A U. � S ~ N C 01 S !.. L CS E Ur^, ^ app �La> O CL Q a° ptl AL asE`�.c v c L c N c o. F5w °.n Ny0' V C «p. NyL ul =9C =A 6�.IQ ^ L C E N a p C^ l „ p v 6 ^°D OIO p.0 U> U _ O p J •° ° D v G .- -Y �' Y N U O � Q ' C^ ° 4 q n'C O Ly EEp °C >wp. O� = L.?dN @e• y'O ^q O1 U aD.a G ° LI u pa «vpio .4.-. a svN .°. av sa f-o. D*z q..dccn r z TF, T) -5, C4 O 41 O a. =3 F L- %7,-'M1 m=u Cg J AFL i60 H-E v-5 Cz ga -21 E-2 Z jL %- LN Tt: u:a hY t e V HE-= 2.2 -Z - a. . 3 g 1- 0. 4Z =79;= ; E�A 2 IS E-- --I R", -2;!-! A .2= La w I ZZ &Z3 -us 8-2 -,-t! la) tiz l As --a C --'Z- A r,-=4 Z- C U, tz t Za I w Fm- COO Ci B 15 -a- YlY a 7 7R n uo 00 Ep�En v « A < N w '� �, N °��w..Y E °au LtlA u �� a°• T N V1°. d,n ia«i �' -_ uNL °o ''�tt"h {,• 2 � �C,a: •La ❑ Mid: r Y2 CV.. - � ON P.. � 8 LYLY. � «. C.O CL WV°.W pu:o �� ropE u �i qNq °u W •` N L ` Y9M�. is v q�'V"C ruQVA c N 6 WEtl@ Y 6 9L 4 L zt VOm S'" u° F Lw L tl V tl � °1AU DO UL, a c c N ° a w rn a rid �L 111111����33 r'• «LC�N NL 1 OV �. tl� o v ^�90 M~ °� +sL At fN C ,.•: LY.r COLY. !' R °u Q V a Co�YC1 C4 L °d 4w C °CY Vp ¢uM S l roca `C CtCU Qa'O .�., icJ ON C r. <QQCZ LQ. >♦ LoY .'« qw L _ dm v°�° UYY rY' aroY r ONp � V q d � Y O1 N F gYmLT°tl6m p tl U IIa r p yV �� s 6p t'^ CEq yq.Q,N Y r.0 J•C � qpE D VM OQ �L,�^ romp L�6R,p `CV a q` u wR VQ y <'Y tlMtl� •O Na �� Hd�iY '"� p rod. wQ. D Yq y6 Y Ncti < = Wig«g a+ UY V A G 9N u<��, .. ' 1A. i O V E r .� H C ~S AQ L u 6'L G� L U. pY ° 4 d' U. �•° u _.Y V •. q q. N O y 17; C O i s o _ X I. a.'c.. tl i a°.b O L « v u pro v tl a4 a '�•" < Y ^ ` vvM � a ro S. . AJ ^ 3 C, V Y . -= .y � - R P r OJ Y N. O1 V � � ^ < C• V M.V. ro Q ° C U � y �", W4 wq.• N.<..E L�Q G E.=i qq «ro g` DN °p�oSf �`.. ,`� y `�- V `E a ti1.VC1il� 6ptlQ} F M.n �RQ m,,. «�R oa v�+YS .Fi Ntl a`V. nv ov Gq t?..O�+N•E ^°.. WNO ;S.6 -GZ <� C.O' sL °.0 f'O L.e � y O OOD • Q:L NOO U J 40.OA� U.. Y d >.w..t. r+ Cv ^^ N = u 'I all dy HhO w U 4: U'OL �� nCd ; p RYN »P P r ' �'• '. L L � w d� 6M �9 Y ♦ i b vV 3�..4 V� •2 L} �V., M �+� N9 U9a» N O i n SS PP 600 CpL� CS CG A TZ W i 4 Op Q �C O�U G O E'er"' ub .Owl +• pN U ° R y C U ail { {ice. 9r per. a6C • b�yV L� WL� U>1 � L'., {'. pe r 'CN � S- } �� LyVj M �Vr� L7d WG. aN Ov m.�0u Z L. a,°. qLL d1 40. m .�O/ CO Cp�`•'YO CW Y °u i, X y J N U g d G Q - y Y N L L u9W� L EEi L EE \ Gad @W Fi `O� 6ULN sLY iM N.. Y.Ow Ga 9May,y y L .i W Y � ,O 9 ly ON VL .OL L mod. O Gyr L +P U O O CCO ,U�il d.� ~Uy�T U r C1 y.�bp16 EN:w yd V map P; \yy r.4 bf• ^ r E L EaN O U VVC �UQ pN •..W NfY �O.PO L L.-. iyvd? AUA B`' yL,y NL Gr ^VUyyP �` �N Y C dP p an nw .cuO ¢n`n r. i'nc.'c++rF .inn cL..wa�+ 4u a'+c --. wai. wi wu amen v °gyp .4 w d Y LyaN A G M G�dL � Yager- P M y v4M `wi. U.o p 2 O,..i W ti L a Tt L 6 bb Lq py ?pig... V�"N Y. K y+ ✓ 5 wy..'O �t .'V. Iz Ly. YV w. CNW 4� et• y? .. F 'O. P p G R q L tea[ �'.. o� rl as C d m '��p k'0U CltL ►J3.. Ep jy QH < M �4M � ) L U t L tj U 5� M Av a4 3 C a ayi La vM � 7 d K t C 'C QL L13 b 1 —9 O C C l ,LJYp NC d.L SOt r� N' a U ` 6Nti m as • t �x M c c .o K u o al c 1^ nt D � • d -:: pU Nom. C C� ry oF1L Z. Ci r0 may. q AW _ E U ,4: pd0 iql 4r? a c.N-a n...a �d dy n ac 'y^�• OC mod, 0. a Nvdi - p[ �Ut C.i -,NU E da Hv C O d "r C p ^ ^k ^cu T s NO du Lt EEu .99 O • 9.. a� • Ed 3� 72 a q=N x0 dY L nM V. 1 d ^j O q q 0 Y L ¢.°. »s o� o� »:c•�v'�.. i. 'o ¢`n 4:-: O a C d .. N ° "ZL Y aN Cd ; lit M aS a .1t u y a L aY .°; a.. "•..y az °m nu..co. c d a C 1 NU CO oT O Ya L Y d> tC V G GO T L c T ` U Z. C O«� YC U V Z u A A'O o t V d4 O. .. SGN -.. d+ •dL ti. 4 � 4 p A C a [.l� �j �j\ U Gp1 a l4 UOf aLi' y1 W O ° • � 6 W :TY V C O 9 N d ° LZ� 01 U` r.YaOw `�`, L q •� 1. «.. ° 1. YE.n a Ft w z / § CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 0 z DATE: 'Felbruary 26, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman, and Members_&` -','.ie Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Pia-riffel"! k BY: HowarO Fields�, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13203 ROBERTSON HOW5 - A residential develop ent consisting of 224 condominuir units, on 10.3 acres of, 7and, in th3 Medium-High Residential District (14-;,24 du/aC'/',t located on the north side of Arro�� Route adjacent to the east side.of Deer Creek Channel APN: 208-341-132, I. PLROJECT AND F. ,�']DFA-,'�RIPTION: A. Action' Ad: Approval of a subdilvision, site plan, a �t�iy �turQ, -Tesign, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. _-J, B. S Aurrounding Land Use and Zoning- North Vacan11, Medium High Residential, South Approved condominium project (Tentative Tract 125,25), Low Medim Residential East Approved apaytment complex, Lincoln Rancho, Medium- High.Residerttial West Approved condoxlaium project (Tentative Tract 12040), Medium Residential C. Gen -a' 12M s_L _.Designations: Project Site - Medium High Residential (14-24 du/a,z) North Medium Aigh Residential (14-24 du/ac) South Medium Residential (4-14 &;i/ac) Eal ,t Medium High Residential (14-24 dd/ac), West, Medium Residential (4-14 du/ac) 9. Site Characteristics: Project. site h&,s a tria,--jular lot configuration-TI-tatgenerally s1opes north. to south at a 41% grade. Project site fronts along Arrow Route and is bordered bo I Deer' Creek Channe I to the west and by tinco'h :Properklies N ap.artn lent cOmPlekes) to the east, There am no -significant 4K hi storicaVor cl ultural values related.to t6is tite. Presently, -fn ail e)� sting, truck g service operates on thi�; site. All ex1 st i A ng structure's are slated for,removal, V", . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM D F .p PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 13203 February 26, 1986 Page #2 II. ANALYSIS• A. General: Froposed development will comprise 224 condominium units within an internal Loop system, with the exception of three (3) buildings, located at the extreme northern portion of . the project site (see Exhibit OB"), Major features of the site plan include building orientation to the centralized open space area, - strong pedestrian linkages, and recreational amenities (.e. two tennis courts, two swimming pools, tut lots, and large size recreational buildings)., Proposed project will be serviced by .a reciprocal driveway entry with the Lincoln' Rancho project to the east (See Exhibit 'B -1 "), and ?iso a reciprocal entry approximately 550 feet north along'the.east property line (see Exhibit "B"). All parking; will be heated adjacent to the Loop, Road system, with 224 carports; 158 uncovered parking stalls, and 56 guests parking stalls, for a, total of 438 parking stalls. B. Design Review Cc,iittee: The Committee reviewed the architecture of the p,apo eed two and three-story buildings and recommended enlarging °the windows at the end elevations of Buildings B and C for consistency; and revising fencing details of recreation areas and carport end elevations to refiect dominant architectural' elements of the proposed buildings (i.e. stucco - and wrought iron). In addition, the Committee recommended provisions for a buffer landscape treatment along Arrow Route, including 3 foot lowsprofile wail in f7ont of the parking stalls with mounding and shrubs. Lastly, the 4 :ommittee f recommended raised planters /benches and potting of plants within concrete court areas of the buildings (Exhibit "G"). r The applicant made the recommended changes to the development plans; however, he failed to address relocating ;trash enclosures at the north end of the project site for better distribution and providing; additional details for a directory ` sign. Both Committee' concerns are " incorporated as Conditions of Approval (see attached Resolution Condition V s 4, 12). C. Technical Review 'Committee: The Technical Reviti: Committee' recommended approval subject to the following: Conducting a fireflow test, and a knox box on the recreational building and all gates to the.project. The Committee also i : required all three -story buildings to have fire 'alarms: installed. A detailed lighting,plan was recommended to provide good lighting throughout the site for site security purposes. The Committee recommended that the. applicant be.required >tc.pay an in lieu fee equivalent to one -half of the established cost of undergrounding the street, frontage, which will be reimbursed to the developer currently ° undergroundi,ng the 12 kv an`d telecommunication line on the opposing side of Arrow Route. -a F• � . '-' ^�,.. -^m,: •- ��,-w�. = SraGr � ? p PLANNING COMMISSIt3n RE ORT 1, " - Tentative Tract 1320. February 26, r986 Page #3 ) D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the initial Sudy has been - completed by the Applicant: Staff has completed Part II ofit)e + Environmental C" cklist and has found that the site is subje. �- to noise lerel�. in excess of '5Ld. eh A preliminary nods,_ analysis hasy been performed to determine'mpliance with the `' Pity of Rancho Cueamonga's exterior standards of 65Ld,., The # stud indicates that - because of` the distance involved (.134 feet), the CNEL will be reduced to less than 65Ld:at all patio,: and balcoiy spaces within the project, which complies with ,the City's standard;. In addition, the 'required larqe canopy trees (241'•. box, 30 >feet on center), along project frontage will provide further, exterior noise mitigation. A final noise" analysis, will be completed as p .4rt of the final building. plan check to en ure_compliance, with the City znd State interior; noise level of 45 dba. This,:study will be,completed as part of ,i the final bTild''!ng plan check. A .copy of Part II of the Environmentar--Checklist is attached for your review and ry consideration. If the Commission concurs; with these findings, issuanrte of a Negative:Declarat16h would be_•in order. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS:. The Findings listed on,thz attachd& Resolution are supported byte following facts: ` 1. The project site is adequate in. size and shape to f accommodate development, and the proposed residential uses are In accord with the oojgctives of the plan and :,_ the Development Code. k 2. The proposed` site plan, in conjunction with the y 4. Conditions of Approval, are..:cons'istent with the current Y �. development standards and rosulat' ns of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has bees advertised' as a public _hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, as,,,,well as posting of ,a large notification sign on project site. V. RECO14MENOATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission''. conduct a public hearing and receive ail public input on- this' fir= k project... If after such consideration, the Commission can support the Facts for Findings and Conditions of Approval, adoption of "the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended: > a k -' 3 PLANNING COMMtSSIONrSTAFF REPORT TentativZ Tract 13203, -; February 26, 1986 Page - #4 i ?' Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner Attachments: "txhibi,t „A-- -, Loeation hiap _ ? Exhibit 811 -Site Plan Exhibit !,,Cll elevations � - Exhibit � -q- - +- 0)oor Plans Exhib It "E' - Conceptual Land'kapi,n ='Plan Exhibit ' -F" Conceptual Grading Plan, ' Exhibit "G-' - Inner Courtyard =�Deia�1's. , Exhibit "H" =. Recraational BYd'g E�leW:ations &hFloorpian Initial Study, Pori; I1 ' Resolution bf Appro�'al with Conditions k , w it r f ,rr r t Ix1 -�;z% iii -S , I • . ;� i NIfr NIM ! � ■ 1 t ■ s 1 IF ■, Hall am ff ! 8 -� ` • • L .. .■ r�rrrr rr•.�rrrrrr■ r r t � '^�� . tartn�xi aaarrf� a Q 1� 4 S4 F7 - J i1 I e �Ew I f l� r a 11 i r i F, HIMI CL %�fllsr /rl,n) —� fl��. //Y • ` ��'j � • � \ f'• LV NORTH GI� • .� .- _ �} •4R&e�,y .�'a[CF'ae � `•i,c�arr �rrn� - Ty Or, r T ITE,:: RANCHO CLCAMOL GA TITLE: - _ PLANNING DIVISION' EXf4[BlT:- Nom' SCALE: f 'F i • a 1 k � Y _� f � � y4 d�� � 1!�.i (h ,. ® i. ... � � it i ®' ^� �1�` 'tA y�y� �. 1 �� �' Y�.�`� \� t1 \i�Ali \. ,.,dad � s ►-: � . �,.'. .. :i ,� .��. i �•3iii�� . � - ,� �', y ,.': s7 a,r.t�� L�^ , � aRF, La r 5 t FRONT & RkAR BuaDINC?;k THREE Mwy D El -El E VAMON IT M FRON-r & REAR BUMDING C THRVV��'SMRY END ELEVAMON PARMHO LOT ELEVATION J--L4 1 41 TYPICAL SECTiom LANDSCAPE EzvA-nom CITY Or, 77 1.- Qio CUCAMONGA RAN TITLE: 45"e PLANNIM,- DIVI,�!QN F-XHIB 'T'---k�—SCALE-- SCALE- TH tM I o v � �■ • 1 - L �: .� 1 ". �. �.', � � � f +� . -_ ��, ✓� ' �" .: I' n2,jN; DIVIStC?�I EXI-Iti31'[': c,►[:E ,. CITY OF Rtu4CHO .CUCAMONGA PART II -'INITIAL STUDY- ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE:-- X/ Af ,s ° APPLI=XT;� • FILING DATE: iT aI 1,F fo LOG NUMBER: 0 3 _ PROJECT^ � 1�!'.tl�,�' .�Eti6�� .e�.�T �2'� G°'!,L ✓.ddb • f PROJECT LOCATION I. ENVIRON*f NTAL IMPACTS (Ex- lanation of ail 'eyes" and "maybe" answers are 'required on attached sheets). Soils and Geoloay. Will the proposal :have YES MAYBE NO T significant results in: s a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? ' y br Disruptions,, dispiacemei.lts, compaction tar burial of the soil? f C. .Change in topography or 'ground surface contour intervals? a• The destruction, covering or modification of any unigte geologic or physical features? y� e• Any Potential increase in Wind or water > erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? _ f. Changes in erosion s??tation, or deposition, ?. � g. Exdosure of people or property to geologic hv.zards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or'similar hazards? • h• A.a increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? xydrelMy Will,, bb proposal have significant a Ary• results in: ;r;p d.; Change in .the. amount= of surface water In acv E a body of water? / e. Discharge- into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwacer characteristics? F/ I g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- through or through interference with an,. aquifer? Quality? Quantity? [ 'f h. The reduc3:1M in the amount of water other- Wise available for public water supplies ?' v% 1• Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flcoding L or.saiches? _ i 3• Air Quality. will the proposal have significant results itt• a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources"', Stationary sour t/ b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? e. Alteration of local or regional climatic e conditions, affecting air movement, moisture k or temperature? �. 4. 83oo Flow a , will the proposal have significant results n• ' Change 'Y the ' -t� characteristics of species,' 3 including diversity, distribution, or number • of any species of � plants.. b Iieductiwgn'o the ntmhers of nny uni ue tt o enstaneared" species cf ; o q ►rare .,s . p ants :.# _. _ �• .. . ,,�;. ..,etc_:. .i.f .. AIM P Page. o ygg . W WavBE ; SO a• Cha ngegr in currents, or the course of direction =of cowing streams,,' r rivers or ephemerei stream channels? < b b., than in absorption rates, drainage pa terns 6 r , ?� k c• Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? 'ao� +_� .:q f YES 'MBS NO c. Introduction of new or disruptive, species of Plants into an area? f d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? i Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results 3 in' a. Change in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or numbers Of any species.of animals? -` b. Reduction of-'the numbers of any uniqut., rare or endangered s g species .of animals. ? e. Introduction of new or disruptive species Cf animals into an area, or result in a. barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: Will a. the proposal alter the location, distri- bution,, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposa', affect existing housing', or c_eate a demand''for additional housing? S. Sock—Economic motors. Will the proposal have si�niticant results is a. Change in local or ra gional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial divetsity',tax rate, and property values, ' b• Will project casts be equitably distributed - among project ben>_ficiaries, i.e., buyers, t Cax payers or pra3ect users? 7. Land Use and Plannine Considerations; Will the proposai have significant results in? A a• A substantial alteration of the przsent or planned land use of an area? b.' A corfiict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental. " entities? e. An impact ,upon the qulaity or quantity, of existing cons=ptive or non = consumptive t y A. recreational opportunities? r Ito �� �� ` Pape 4 YES `.,LkyBE NO l B. Transvortation{ Vill.the, proposal nave sig zicant xr+ results in: a, Generation of substantial addiir:onal vehicular movement? b. Effects nn existing reets, or demand for new street con tru l 4� 4 X C. Effects on existing g Parking facilities, or demand for -ne'w A 4j I parking? � d. Substantial imp act`upon. Jr w existing transporta- tion. systems? e• Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement',of people and /or goads? tip f. Alterations to or effects on•present and Potential water- r�rne, rails mass transit or air traffic ?: g. increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclist,., or' pedestrians? 9. Cultura}: Resources- ',.Will, tF, proposal have significant ,results in:' _r' . ` •� a. A disturbance to the integrity of ,archaeological, paleontological, and /'or historica,'s resources? 10. Health,_ Safety and Niiisance Factors. Will the n proposal; have significant results 3a; a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? �� b... Exposure of People to potential health hazards? My C. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of'An accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals i or species of vector r g patheno enic organisms a, or the e,cposure,of people to such organismr? e. ,Increase in existing.noise levels ? f� Exposure of people to {potentially dangerous noise levelol, a i' &• The; reation of objectionable odors? yd.v An Mincrease in Tight= or ,glare.? bM1 _ F� ¢e 5 `` YES_ LaY'vE NO r;. A h i 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant T results in:,� a. The obstruction or degradation of -any scenic vista or view? b. The creati- Hof an aes,t.hetieal.ly 'offensive � site? c. A conflict sth the objective of.designaited or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a glgnificant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: , a. Electric power? b.— Natura`i or packaged) gas? _ r f C. Communications systems? d. Water supply? 1/ e,. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h• rice protection? ✓I ' i. Police protection? -/ J. Schools? k' � k. Parks or other recreational I nal facilities? _ �f - 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including' roads and flood control facilities? M. Other governmental services? 13. Enere} and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in:': a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? ! p� b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing i., sources of energy? C. An increase in the demand for development of a. .s new sources of energy? d.' An increase or perpetuation of the consumption a€ non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible' zenewable sources of energy are available ?V. Page 6 " YES MAYBE . NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natval resource? 14. Mandatory Findings of Sitz ificance, _ a. Does the project have the' °potential Ito degrade tthe quality p4; the environment, substantially s reduce the hzbitat of fish or wildl {fe species, cause a fish`!or wildlife population`to drop below self .sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict.the' range of a =are or ' endangered plant or anitral or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the en ronment is one which occurs in a relatively t, brief, definitive period of time while long - i term impacts will endure well into the .future). _ ✓� c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively ` -' considerable? (Cumulatively considerable ix. means that the incremental effects of an , individual p;eoject are considerable when viewed in connectiaa with the eft`ects of past: projects, and prooable'future prp.jects). I d, Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly ci indirectly? DISCUSSION OF Etn'IRONMFNTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of .affirmative_,answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposm&-- Itigation- measures), 2b) 7izoJ r .�•eo�,�mG. w.tG sae jsG ,+ � .nrazsar�-of �ro00AjW1u,,ej, Srf,1' •.S i C't&.t77yG XlmNVoef IiCL OISPlE�,+;r,� r. &W" Be Jwb" y-#e DIar-e.77A4t o,F SHE eW, �idf�,yEE,�, �)PA.Wsf�E "s�JrGG 8� ' > ' G�i2Eer�gi> TO s�fPE ar,,gv�to�.Rr aT� '44da, 1770.r 4y,0 coArye1,R6- l o ceas� , t �,2��✓.ssne�.��y ii ors-_ 441W -- -i1X A .s�ieKCq� ryo /sue ?0"-n ? eoW .&:i; e_ � 2�j �TO2roive/� 9 SEvB.Ot/G .L�rsrsveE o� i�y�, , )*W44 ry0is6 r/.G,al. si' E e4aeer >o ,¢ 4ccgoy !!7lU��p �;� �riLdi�✓S 'Ca�/STietstruv 579Fit fT 91GTio�rJ /ils°�7SW�s �„ 3��, i �itecE_S! Lav�'i�oJr- rf7f� aLECa rs,��✓as t. 9P✓ �,fiP yPE'.: S. ✓� N� ?'eviaer }; !tltt.� L�E�T� .3FAbiTioNA t �vEG.t � ,FH Se r+VCitE,Els�S y,ZE BfiD qREd7E� ?AIAW �'� may' Ta y�iV " '" oW,4' E9 L K ! Sr.mv'L ltst=�5 , f j III. DETMI} NATION San the basis of this'initia? evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a signifcerit effect on the environment, g anti a N'EGAT'IVE DECLARATION will be;' prepared. P P I find, that although the proposed project could hav° a significant effect on the env' ronmenti ' there Will not be a significan� -efrec cape because'the ilitiga;tion c w attache measures.described,un an attached sheet have been idd'ed to the c DECLARATION WZLi BE PREPF(RED. project.' A YEG3TI`E � €it+d } -' proposed project •:L4,y have a. sf a env rament, and a E:IVIP,Oi;�$T ts"=eluiredt �n the ;LVACT REPORT Date_ at e Title + a; 02- � .a r ti a ° RESOLUTION NO. , i } A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13203 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13203 (for condominium purposes) hereinafter "Map ", submitted by Gary Mazur, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property s- ituated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga," County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a 'residential subdivision consisting of 224•c6ndominum units on 10.3 acres of land, located on the north side of. Arrow - "Route .adjacent to the-e'ast' side of Deer Creek Channel", re 0 arly came before the•iPTanning Commiss14, "for 'pub l -ie, hearing and action on February 26, 1286; and 1 WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval.of the Map subject, to all corditions sei forth in the Engineering and Planning. Division's` reports; and ' WHEREAS, the Planning, Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division`s reports and "has consiaeiked other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning ;Commission of the City of Rancho qP Cucamonga does resolve as followsa1 SECTION It The Planning; Commission makes- the following findings in regard to Tentative Trac -No. 13203 and�the Map thereof; (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Cade, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development,. Code, and specific plans; £' (c) The site is physically suitable for, the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to.cause - substantial environmental damage and avoidable F injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f), The design of the tentative tract will .not conflict t with any easement acquired by the public at large,'', v now of record,, for access ,through or use of the" . property within the proposed subd "vl"ion. _ "k PLANNING9 :COMMISSION RESOLUTION Page #2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on _ the enyironmert and a' Negative Decl•arat,ion is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative 'Tract Map. No. 13203, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby apprc••� subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: rr� Design Review: 1. Applicant shall - submit material sample board to City Planner' a for review and - approVal prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Applicant shall submit landscape and hardsca`e inner courtyard details to City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. ` 3. Applicant shall submit all fence details to City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Provide decorative block wall along Deer Creel: Channel to the satisfaction of City planner. - 4. Applicant shall provide a screened trash enclosure for units 9 ,Y and 10. 1 S. Applicant shall provide a 10 foot 'wide texturized pedestrian connection to northern open space area. 6. Developer shall provide a combination of berming, landscaping and a 3 foot low profile wall along Arrow Route adjacent to - rA parking stalls for screening. �., 7. r� Applicant shall provide one 15 gallon tree every 20 feet on - a center and landscaping' (shrubs and groundcover), along the entire west property line. 8. Developer shall provide spasial landscaped statement at main entry, subject to review P," city Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 9. Developer shall submit a detailed lighting -plan to include both tj high and low level lighting for review and approyal by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 10. Developer shali relocate trash enclosures at the `'southwest corner of project site for better site distance. e 11. Developer' shall submit sign permit 'application and details of '' H project directory sign and other monument signs to the City, r< Planner for review and approval', prior to issuance of building",,,, {- permits. vp PLANNING COMM*_SSION.RESOLUTION Page #3 :i 12. All pedestrian linkages •into centralized open space- shall :be delineated by accent trees and shrubs. 13. Shade cover, (iye. trellis) shall be provided-over all trash enclosures., 14. Prior to issuance of building permits,,a final noise 'study shall be submitted which discusses the level of interior noise attenuation, the building` materials and. construction techniques used: to achieve a maximum interior noise level of 45 dba. Tract' 1. Developer shall install all, street imp;^ovements along Arrow Route frontage including to the bridge .on Flood Control property. k� 2. The applicant shall pay, prior to recordation, 'a fee, in -lieu of andergrounding overhead'12kv..andx'telecommun cation lines along ',J! Arrow Route. Said fee shall be one -half. of .the front fobt cost of undergrounding as established by City Council for, a distancr: of 457 feet, ' NO R. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26T4 DAY OF,FEBRUARY,%198& P. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY'OF RANCHO "CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman :a ATTEST: Brad Puller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the ,,City of - ^} Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify, that the foregoing_ Resolution was duly -and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commi_. -ion City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planningt6inmi"ssion held on the 26th day of February, 1986,, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: r _ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: F � \ VjY ¢M . r y f r� oyLbo AU Oa va: i ^ ^>.ao �c Na6. m'�.Y d �n (nv� �•r.N QCL V4 SJ� G y.L q^ C qw Y L TQQgg �. VCC' Oq° tl � dMH L •�MLf�«V.:p9N °f N UW 6 aL q� p� _ o � YCd �. • pq Ly A^ wa Ad SAO -C .� 1 L M b ` p 4b+ � 6q. P 4r by ♦1Q E. >Q V - - Q Cw • L G.p �M d .0 VOyM NuwC. y.w q�V P � N . V..QVL Q Y6= �. w.p 'VaG � �, U ELfE.e ppNq C �L nL °CLN i C�C'0c OI C Wd~ Yat U qw Lb.O 4y d POO q =QQ '� iC DI ws N� - p aC ,N=ina d.'d'ao Yw�u nN Nb bd r.� ���..b .-. v iY� g «�',•,� w E Cf Y q � y E c y d po E O I LA N C 0 p °fYEE yf da -� Y C g C P G C F ^Y Y• P° a - u E eq� q. ^04'p •CG'r NN At bCgaa+ � t qPC��.� fJ r� L'L E O PCy. ^gip T�f•w 'f d.UA °a y YQ lLI T� O. °'� ycTc�Va +C ?��i C.r LQ.CNp Q p.V qN if y..° �L • tl C y d0 Y qc0 .a Y. $� C QLCCf f u p r y F M V 1, N E- C a g V M C rCC O Y 0° Y 6 cL• U u Y u Nd : V G Dd uqN 8 6L +N•Y'k g69 iin LA .«;Y o E aq �.Nw'.fd � ?' c M ' CY N,�Y . SMN .i. A azN a 3 rz= $O O .Qa mC . Oua. M C '•• Lp E nH -_ m 0 4C y •� V °O gEP3Qg W �g �M L Nw b0 p may' °T° - • np 5 S Y a Y. E CL w '/W q p f1L L q q Q. .,a- V N'G Cain a P� STO.° w L °.h �v .sov C � O v. - i.. F � � 4 � d T Y LF D•C. ^ Y l' i a \` .J.e poE q L i SH [}. �•r Q .0 LNL.3a «qC C r.+yz+,.,,k.a%�e+>..wM �,m . „ .� ' 5�;•,.. ,arc" • a A Y w Y M N U. i.'. O M, E ^�a; 2p a° D w'093 �~C�Y EOM wt 6w. pLY.w Y.. -FIE VC pY -cy�N a^•°i~N: °U'.1."Q.L L 179 CC CVC L ',�y V X 4. ^yp q N <Vi. N~U Yq0 b�C�Y Y Y ^B- wU3 w 4 @ �_ 4w E >• $� ` gSN. l,VN NL.'Gi •.9 O LL° 'p o'fi No ohs u o< = �oA p 0•' wa�dN NTY4M0 L<I NRS N o,cta �w a YoYµ.:w4 w..Yp p .aNro ' ro4 Y Ct Y � 5 ati.�o^ •" t-NL Lco ;. c 0. FM Y U . a �. O c C iE.�ip\G \.oG �rpiY Y•.• N.MONIU•,A At. axt f..l O C °� C M i b L O•+' ro ° c� w wu O1. Qq, MYa .°5 as • N C >OLy '6y pG _ L U t +: L.y 0. �. U w L u y � H11.r.YL 6° ca ow M.w <a •^ aPu wO c�.op co r• o> �ror •O w. T ^ < S 4C Uro A M p L V s o oR f C< Q.-II .C- V,I_ 0 . N s ty 5�b � ^ B o u r TcE 'v Y•, t' O3 b M. dw Yt^ uw - w w oGx4� w a.•iY e. C �. u 4° . UT� a d `i y.O Dw �„ <�wco G.Y.. C Lq.„Viu °�w2 G CyoM= <Yro�s <CUC:.a bqC� w� °paY ~ °G u6 YC. �gEOroro.. u0 yT ^'O w.•'n:p Y <.. t.r 61,N< � <y NY °� pp 9 .pYP . ..6o L E N9 ONV ° V *7z C ? M o aL°r pLu N V O w A � .• Y C b U Dt S ro S � y� bN _< 0 6 N ~` W y i I C Y Y O- E. b ` b W ro 90 = GN � ^Y O S9bO o T ;T o pc: C g dO b N = w t __ V1M t ' V.iU 6 9 7 �Y •. p =. Q C 74 C �a.E l.� wT.J'. ^� bYY.uwNV�. C, N V. •Ff �^.,.V Y • C~_V p <.' 9 bEytb EU'O 6Y a GC .1--c ..o c N M ^ yE ... YC°i O w VOb og �. b b G 4 b V Y a O C Y w p .C. U 6a ° w O° O <A 4i 23p I�r. NCO ct-vui.a .nazi; cuw=.9 GUw.+. pLfa -w•�- N C:e - 1- «<in6wG - • ?. ��i I4J U S- R 0- �06 at so S P-1 % vAal o* ol .3 d:XqV, wy wdCL 11.9 49, —.5 -4 tz -- -a 'Z 4 Zb SC G^ 4Y Yt d�,My1Ng0 —5 X. 8 8 .2 E. 9t:_ 9 's E 2 HT 1!2 11 1, Zz W, ._-a. R. E. tL t y1 w N ✓ G H -1 ;;§,g -Nw "Fla a S= N u g d�pa AA .5z V;S In; bCLCIb X.- p2za U. g-st, "c 5-9 C td a T 'a E!g L--- XZ a ps a2z ul z :54 -N, Z -7z -Z a - -w V 2 - tC gz:� ., an. o h; « E�'x T6 �4.OL yc i� m3 'YO CC Ld M O y d • �qE °J� Ufa w i =UOd ° ditYi a "a � p° d i E.d GO dE� O a 6L p j N U H y Yt E f E A A V 4 b rn T yN� OUE ^ r. v Q1 m .e..�Y 9 M.n -E u - °d o,°.+dZ;- E.ac os_,.L F .- u P R to ' u'o �.rE u W •� � {C q G « Y —lo Y. ETay • 9 6 N ,O r 6V � r Q O Y. N � F�� .. O .Z ♦ c ^ '-. A^ tT ^..0 Q L a. Y yOpp.s 2 Fg W C V•,^:> G? Ya E.d Oy ^O' Od Od. W cM tu ro acL tfl;! aL S�NLO 6� io¢ LLO L aALi. H L 9 <aq _a°' 4!"n i F2 C h<f1M T -E I^iG V- ra.e N �O°� I`UW E..O� na. t�tn b.�gY:O >J a� b 1>l O O H � t•n < . Cam. Aft .ate Y �taGS Y�Otq rr.� 7L Z LS. yO -C rNa'L° .°+.. cd d do Y++a P • •` • N9 L dN ^S N m o K A a d y r A C N a •�U 6NVVr N LO c> q .^ ^��A. 4A ON ^Q! 4 > « OI N q Oe � b a d y L py Ii;9..P c eSOy C9a -^ dw'L L Ott � y.. td • � q. b •.E M 6* `.. a'o d ", E ,� � 00.+ 9y. N.O. ^ut Tom.^ Ste. ty•� E A Z 6 L ff >LY q N MNCALL CEOY p A • Wd PAL UO d U �E L' ..�..,. a... F CQ 6qO dw P °t Y = T.✓.O `E. YdFIQ . Rtl' Y E.� FiO E SO _ • a C Ea^ G L EOb �yq0 eLr trt G a0,t 6V CL c^ 6^} i..°..y4 G O A ^ O O E 4 -�W q t'l Y .+ 4 •� V tr C w Y9N d - , w 4 =1 �C..^ Nj pN jc•n E'CO J d R. AC..F. �V`O¢Ep V. .0 ac +c EO E•..... L1'ff f r NpuV vtN.. 2�^ uL�^ 4 1_-.q �-.¢4m C'].V N+• �u -W4. WEi ba'�+u: •m O O. OHO' t y,..n. y d • -'C � N t d o aL Cm Or�6 ry. .C..• V M yM O.O yrYLA Ora pYNL C 04-. L' V S L O b CGN aE a m Q.� T CNC`O C O O�.r ON n W I�YL>N Y°.N l.7 dp.' Yf. ON O1 c kL d�`n �m.ra,0 ya.Cl. n.•. 4rO yG � ro~ Y -wNw oN.NUw A 'O.CH .mCN Y � C O ~ G Y y:y y = Bo L rpaG 4rp �acib d a °Qn ,�aEie „_. a• u. 4 . 4 °dF N S 'su H L Em.. ° GO b�0 E ;'� E'N NEpywO kr GA A^ a4dN� - y a Y m� I O �a T' NwY P q�V e MG O m m L o.K .du P' • I. r V•O GA U O.L 11':S YY - ma Gc a aum a m ocp a bm u. �. a. N E N d ^ ° �cv u L.LY�E mG p Tb p Y� b -0 rq 'IIt Oq� y��d \- 'II C Cr- W € °•� L' L � m4 d 3 T;T N c A 9 Y C L.n. X. >dYa p) :b L�:n ma Y �e'r.�. �9 °Ef ~„ • YNN MO � 'A.4 p� CI cca ��?v I m'bC 1° aC„q c u aZ pp� AL aA a L•= E 4 V.Y q Y F n 1O Cq uLiE .nm m rm rn m qi O uq �_y T O y G A 'OCR GoN pq 4 �y c i€ �bAC n� � € � ..E. a« mN. b � R o W tm�°-cu E'O. xfl • rli a; � Y t u n L a w r M b N b y W h d y V° Nr 4 b A4 T r ad � •4. .. A C ApvL Cm.�u_ d O Y++ - •;J', µµ ,i• ' nb bp. t:9r0 C LV b CJV Y 5 rb �pW by„ O q a =C G db u4a b.TOaL °d.A'. Wt mp P {f O•G E "' rmY �du a. ay cm0 m ca °w F C� N O L rA O dq ma C Y- V El OO d VY x `,u.L numb c GFAG O.N'J'.AV dC On''nErL b °s, q ya" `o `oo u� d u u ei mom° w a YLO..oaay d° o °f q ° � ai•Ts x u � ,� .c � � i s �,� ' Cf. d V O 6T Y i] 2. L N N. c d.>y a xG ° 6 ss aE W d V » T q A » L N N I f � Qd a E Lc \�. *J� o�° ETq d . L CW ^Qw GEC � a Y d; c V d � .-I- YL- LL S N W V LL yO,LL d� °dMA Lp --m y I�t y Mp i v'O gmLC Q vEY ° ddC GC' TZ C— O • Ed Q dq d I_ //. q°V� y a� Q eGicaym vdiE9D NL.pq QdL � C a -L °�Ly� a nnii.Q0- q» .D L ; y O.' Nq.- TG \Q � d�.p Ey G1I � S.Qadr yR OE CC .Y.;r q q 6 a N E 0 y r°GJ 6 Ew rL� T LW aJY cNU VW TL y Y c 'Td�C NG q QGVtIM NOM�J N4 d .� �Qti R� W Y »Llil S6 V9 Q W E qty C Ty d 9 � u p d S C 6Q 9 =.0. 4'� yy x°» u� .rGC- t mW •`- Py,. >� iiiJJJs g« G v Z tm it op­ L 01 N N L d G s aMu. i ..F Vy... O DV Wau 0 Or a W LLY V Ga L L. L :` N o.r L y T �• ca O O i L L1 m.4 E W ��V? n6 N Gq dYT l - .+L .F-s �.Oa - n e.M ° me a 3 aa -1 ° c ��+N.. T mm d c m A , . °• L c m e� n� � � T nvr •AGE ' A o• a 3 v d LEE. rn m o° Bf 1 a Y ny. N �p CC L r U L E.m AN rU mq= W Lqq � C 4 N LO � p G d0 r `qra N cT .off ._ate r oo ° d � > :c md „' du L °tee a r. n y G p n Gq E �• L °� G t N N o O NV_ d L ° a V O N d y NCLN .d LL ! 2. n O OY W' L 00 E T r+.{ - °tLL G O �.. 4 9.W. vLL L O i U. 0 m d O 'A .} C LL GV s. ` O wzi rq nO'..Q 4a n � q d E q �• my .•>„G v 4! y^°,., r CW �'N ��'. q� '^ �i .�.' *... r dOU 000 L. r, � 5 -L v° .2s • U �.'.mez U 9V, ... im ar ,G'ITTOF RANCHO`CUCAMONGA CA yp STAFF REPORT oil- -t 0 A; FDATEV _oruary 26,.1986 v _u 1977 lanning GommSss.on FROM: Barrye R. "Hanson,:;,$enior Civil ,Engineer` BY: Ba6ara Kral 1, Assaistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND, PARCELA,)MAP 9349 � SMITH A division . of ' acres , o lana i:n o: parsets in t ,^fie Very Lo 'De'vel'opment , District.(2 du /ac) located on the sauth side of Strang Lane, west of Carnelian Avenue. APN 1061- 271 -07 ' I. PROJECT ANLU SITE DESCRIPTION: � A. Action Requested: =Approval of > Parcel Map, B. Purpose: To d'ivfde L :1 'acres of hnd. thto 2 parcels in the ,Very �oL-w�ievelopment District.. ,, 1 C Location South side o Strang Lane,: west of Carnelian. j 0. Parcel Size :" Parcel 1 - 25,341 square feet Parcel,2 -5 20,122 square feet Average Lot Size square feet E. Existing Zoning Very »Low Residential (2 du /ac) F. Existing Lan& Use: Parcel 1 - Existing single family t 'y Parcel 2 :Vacant G. Sur4undingLand Use K th = Exis: residential South -! Vacant East - Existing residential West - Existing residential H. Surralmdin. General Plan and Develo ment Code Designations = -9ery. ow, esn,_entia ui£aci; �( Sauth - Very Low Residential 2 du /ac? r r 8 East Very Low Residential'2 du /ac.� �° T West - Very Low Residential (2 du /ac) I .,i' i� �k r �tiryi�"i�nY..._.r. .. .,. •s:'_. A..a k rdF � 0 F Af �NVIRONMENTA6 ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 049 SMITH February 26, 1986 Page 2 Site CharacteHstiCs,: A �natural drainage channel runs- -through the westeMy side: of .;ParceT 1. A single family residence is�also located on Parcel 1. Parc6l 2 is vacant. U. ANALYSIS:­ The purpose,i6f the,.parcel i1pi is...to subdivide an existing 13 m acre parcel -�Ioi;4parcets. � P 't arcel � I w4 1 econtain the existing 11 residence on thb� pftqey�ty�" Rirc-61- 2 V d` w 91, -be eV0,60ed jz the f UZure. Both p , C,ls 4j- -cess- from ar String Uine, which -is a paved' private street extending—to ��th'a s' 44 e p from Carnel i ' enue a. dUtjanke,—of approximately 1600,-'feiij: Strang, La - Is p�es_e int -by "the. abutting property�o e This subdivison does ribi; confrom to, thelbasic Planning CoWission Policy stated � in Resol.utioh"� No4 . 7947 re,4Qjrin§' dedicated acc'ess '_ for subdividing, however i'L��could be approved`�nddr the allowabl'ie­ ariations section of the sa[me'-r6U4utions �(�df& to Exhi b tf',, _C Staff, feels that a variation is ap 6 the to the. General priop6ate_ ecayie -1 , — ' 'tffi r _ Plan and Oevelopmenf.'Cod` 1 ere b requji;amen s, t , are severa - parcels of I generally the s'ame, s'ize�`aiona;­,St-rang_' th- 'Lane, and-, i parcel 01 wi I i m dedicate street riihtfo,f,way and provide a, lienig' erif. for theifluture ,,ereem P':; constructions of A neediid,cut de sac bulb at the rmi'nbs'of Strang Laae. , The Planning Commissions appeirs to haveL the following options,: 1. Approve the parcelmap,,as proposed subjact to Ae.access variations, 2. Continue the parc-el­.ma0,,i -with t.he consent of the appiiimt� until dedicated access�..is obtained to th' site -r 3. Denial of I t I e Avenqq,. or 1yarce mflp. 'he Staff has received a letter from the adjacent- pro �rty owner iii fa,�or of the proposed parcel-map. 'p", III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and cons i dpeati on is Part r I of tFe—TRURal Study as, cd 1.dTi'cdP+,;_­ Staff mplete'd b4f the� an"I has completed Part, 11 of, the Initial tfudi'��the i7hq t has conduc ed a field InvestigatAom. lupo,�i compleL,ftn-'04_nd -'reVi,e4 of t e 6, ' 4: Initial Study and field investigation, Stpff fb�nd' go 410ente-.AA t, pac s on I the environment as a result of the �proposeid, subdivPision IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Nftftes of Public H'e*ar%'q 'have been s tl'� to, sbflo�6unding property own and �,Iaced in the 'Daily Repprit NjSwspa r. + Pdstj,!rg,,At t a the site has also been.c6mpleted. 'J 01- � "NEW 1NEffi&X1§fi d i SAC �a �.. '\• , Por.! y. co ZY?I 3989 1770 9710 939 X74.70N /oz ioz r ^2 ftp IL LA a.. ,,.�. Pert m2 a io�z ,oa 0 21 (si 22 rj} y 116 �.�� _7 23 ~28 Q 2a � � -� Ci•� TJi� Si� ra p►w� l.s.w F- : St `0° e 0 '�--F tt��11 9 q . �♦ J ,, M7. S92 92 2 PROTECT wo 40 'vz y J 93.oD 930 • � e C� OF t# n=' PARCEL MAP 93+9 3� 1C I® CtTC TC1NCs iC �liC1NITY MAP ,. EGINEEaMG IilMON, Mum 11 A it T x tia s s ; a n 3r -star x r` w. h RESOLUTION NO 79 -07 A.RESOLUTION'OF THE PLANNING COMISSION Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC91ONGA ESTABLISHING SUBDIVISION ACCESS :61PROVE2iENT- POIiCr. �. v WHEREAS, the Planning,,gmm1ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga t wishes to discourage the - proliferation of private unimproved streets, and i WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish firm Policy guideline to t inform property cwneis of the City goals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IS RESOLVED AND ESTABLISHED, that as a condition of approval of any Parcel, Map, Parcel MaprWaiver„ {'Tract ,tap or Lot Line Adjustment an applicant shall have.accesf� to -d fully dedicated and maintained City street:. Whare; dedications and imprbvementsdo net exist, the applicant shall obtain a minimum of fvtCy ( 40) feel of dedication and improve with twenty -aix (26) feat of pave' ent needed sheet frontage to reach the nearest maintained City street. Variations from this policy will require approval of the City Engineer of the City of. Rancho Cucamonga subject to appeals to the Planning Commission. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JANUARy, 1919. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,r e, Hermes Rempel, Chairman 'i �; II �f ,a LAU- Secretary of th e Planning Commission I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning- ^.omission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 01 do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly an6 regularly introduced, passed, and adopted ty`the Planning Commission of the City of Ra "` Cucamnnga at -j a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th dav' -,,f January, 1979,; by the folizaing vote tc -crit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: GARCIA, TOLSTOY, JONES, REbiPEL NOES: COti�L?SSIONERS: NONE {' ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL r �;.. EXH,I a ' SCE 41' R 7-7 A Y FES 181986 Via, 9061 AN FU .718191 lei 77 a - AA I rd Rr.. Pasasive-a *0 +k<- i'v;5 bK 1.3 ac"e's PARCCLS �57-t-M.4)V6 J, AVZ APM lOdl—A71—,07. =R11.5 I-tSm Is -oll AG�#V'014 ;76,19 P14 61.4 It W�e Wovi-A A.IRICS 'TV ac o400' I IV ..,W ep RM C-04. �b A S DR�lfvcv Li/� C4 1, 13 -big .&a*kLj C.$:Aot_r 1-0 b\ P.. MN;lAi "C L 1 V15 40 IV -rwD Vxiay Pima Momas o K S-r-O 016 L 4 A(,f_' Z24RIjVes PAS-r /0 A /I �Yo%ws A T_ tA'All Aam A X_.. V 6 UL 10 B u I i'� a 6 41 Q_ BID 1'r 1.*� a f _S r= Y:' L 7 E`7 y: e *�'. Jig, � NOTICE 0 PUBLIC HEARING '.. RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 121ANNING•COMMISSION' i'he Rancho Cucamonga (!fanning Commission will be holding public hearings at 7:00 v . an February,�26, 1985 at the Lion?s,Park Commun#y Building located ' at 9161 Base line Road; Rancho Cucamonga, California 91733, to consider th"a following described prix aet(s): ENVIRONKNTAL ASSESSMENT ANO PARCEL. MAP 9349 SMITH - A divis:sn of 1.3 acret of land into 2 parcels in the Very Lox Development District (2 6u/ac) located ion Avenue - APN 1 .061- 271 -07. ^ on the south `side of Strang Lane, west of Carne! , f Anyug-ie having concerns or questions -in any of the above items, are welcome to contact the City Fanning Division at '0,14) 989 -1851 or visit the offices !coated at 4340 Base Lint, !toad, Unit B. k, Also, anynna objecting to or in favor of the above, may appear in person at the above- demribed ,aeeting 'or may submit their concerr, -"in witing to the-- r Planning Division,' City-,of Rancho Cucawi ngp-4 "or to said pting. February 14, 1986 Rancho Cucamonga 'Planning, Cor, :mission k`v N r �• �^ t �. i �e 1 •. . � ti ''CM 4�.. ! �. • is r' t F"L1 " _zI f •. f ten, .:1' ENVIIAOT&EENTAL RE+ TI]E yr O APPPIRCA-TION ,r UL g IIti�ITIAI� STLM .- PART I = GENERAL For all projects requirn`ng gnvi_ronmenta.1 review, this form mist,, be ,completed + and submitted to the D�e,ye),opment. 2evieyj Cormnittee through the department where the project application ii made .Upon receipt of this a ca tap., the may' Planning Divisiaa: ,staff wi'lll� prepare Park: II_ of the tuitiulpStu'dX {and make w recoamaenda. +.ions toTannip;g Commission. -The Planning Co "1 .wnl'1 make„ one of three determirfationsi: (�) >ne, project Wi kl gave. ,nQ `os�i�nift.cant environmental impact and���a, Negative Declaration will be_fitea, , The_, 1 project will have a ss(gniflcant environmental impact add an fnarironulental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) ' An additfhai informat-gon report should be supplied by the. appticant,giving further informs on concerning the proposed project. Date Filed:_,:I1�,« �1 •i l :�,rS a :Name A Project Title: ,E Applicant's ' ,' ddressy Tel hone._' ., Namei— dress, telephone of Person To Be Contacted t Concerning this Project: !_ Location of FPo$ect_ 6M_- .,.�y_^ Assessors `Parcel No.: List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federat agencies and the agency issuing such permits„ PROJECT DESCRIPTIGJJ Proposed use or proposeO. project: t y e� - �` ✓,�, -ate wE �f�,� �' �q�f0>s)c ) • r Acreage of project area end square footage of exist. 'g and proposed'buildings, if an A f Describe -the environmental sett of ng the project site including information on topography, soi stabi ity, Plants (trees), land alt.imals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of Surround properties, and the description of any e%is,;ing structures and their Jtse (attach necessary Sheets):- .. /Eyc3 ,- °•�- ' Cc:F?-.y-rr � _` � ` _, _ � �:Ssre.r,s� .tir �t',�� +':i�t,J rc.4•.c.�7r r *r . JAJ.4�yiyer `L /.y / " �<S •raM -, X� <3�v,��' 7"'• 7�; .7"— ..._.._.. Js �ustZZr�, CTif l:S /{FrF.t/T Y�ist/2L►. i Is the project hart of a larger 9 Project, one Of a series )f cumulative:. actions, which although• individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental. impact : i -2 'g"" '— =a+c '*;E;'•t tee°-^" MILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO' 1. Create a substantial channge ^in. aroumid contours? - 2. Create a substanttal change in exiiztina noise o ;product` <ibration or ,1 14E e? 3. Create a'substantial change in dersand -'i°or municipal services ' o'(ice xp ,fire, water„ sewa9aetc J, ? 4. Create changes' in the existing Z�nny`or General Plan des ignat"ions� S. Remove.any existing trees? How man yz i_ 6. Create the need fr ,use or disposal of potentially L, hazardods materials,',uch as toxic sub.�tances, flammables or explosives ?,�-j Explanation of any YES answe 4•ab .o (atiach additional sheets if necessary): i Estimate the amount of sewage, and solid waste materials this project will generate• daf ly— , _ S. Estimate the number of u o anG track ti -,,P:; generAteii, daily by this project: 9. Estimate the amount of ,grading (cutting and fillt`iy) required ftr" this: = project, in cubic yards: �/Sr lO. If the project involves the construct residential units, �L�?rplete the farm on the next page. ?' isERTIFICATYOla: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in ja the attached exhibits- present the data and information regt!irep fog this , initial evaluation to the. best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and cc,•rect to the. ;best -of my knowledvQ';and belief.:. I iurther understand that additional i ' } o r abe submitted before an adequ,�ta evaluat ohan ' made the F t'znrl J : Division. Date: Signatures %�ry� Title : 1 nCSO' 4TION NO. A :RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,; APPROVING PARCEL. MAP NUMBER 9349 (TEOATIVE PARCEL MAP -NO. 9349 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF STRANG LANE EAST OF CARNELIAN AVENUE. ` WHEREAS, Tentati;4 Parcel' Map Number 9349 submitted by Brian Smith and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the'south side. of Strang Lanes eag3, of ... . Carnelian Avenue, being a division of Loy, 4, Block ,13, Ct..;�monc�a Homestead Associatic!i Lands, as recorded in Book F, Page 46 a San b6rnF lino ,Maps County, State of C- ilifornia; and WHEREAS, on June 28,•,1985 a formal application was submitted requesting review of "the above - described Tentative Map; and : ;AREAS, o;; February 26, 1986 the Planning. Commission held a "dully advertised public hear r.f`for the above'described map. I, /AC NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CU 4AMOWGA F!LANNING'C%%1ISSION RESOLVED FOLF.OWS: SECTION 1: That,.the following itiindings have been made: �. 1. That the map i consistent- With,tie General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivis.ior is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That '. the, site is physically suitable for the ` proposed development.: ') ". 4. That the proposed subdivision aitd will not cause substantial environmental dama�.t., public' health problems or have adverse affects .abutting property. it SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environment— ar impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on, February 26, 1986. ' y SECTION 3• That Teritativ;^ Parcel flap No. 9349`is approved,sub4ect to the recoane`nded Conditions ;of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS•_26TH'UAY OF February, 1986 J PG.ANNINIG COMMISSION OF THE CLTY OF RANCHO CUCAi:9) GA 8k': t �� Dennis u.' tout, Chairman " Tr �- gas W& ,y A TEST: Era Bu erg Deputy Secret ary I, Brad Buller, D'aputy Secretary ;of, thE, Planning Commisslo�r of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga, do hbre�y 'the ' ycertify ttrat foregorig Resolution was duly, hand regularly introduced, passed; and' adopted by the Planhing CN".M1SShOn of z h0 ! City of Rancho,- Cucamonga,,. af.,A regular meeting of the ?banning, +Co :.,is5ion: hE;:ld on the 29th day of Febrt,4ry;`1986., by the forl1 w:9hg vote -to -wit: AYES: C.,'MMISSIONERS'` NOES: COMMISSIONERS:: � ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:. .. a _ a } k b } 4 .. t 8 x t L'� �.4.btcli� 11*_° .wt. y :z..< ,.,- -- � �„a-� `� `.n'xsrr.i �, =ei "..+,� -r �•wa+r°q �''yinC'.' ^."�y, i RR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ` ?� l RECOMMENDED rONDITIONS OF APPROVAL w -, LOCATION:' south side of Strang Lane TENTATIVE PARCELj,1tAP NO: 9349 east of Carnelian _ DATE FILED: June,281985 _p LEGAL DESCRIPTIGN: Being a division of .a Nff,BER.OF LOTS:2 * portion of Lot 4, Block 13, Cucamonoa GROSS ACREW - (1.3.(ret.) i Homestead Association. Lands recorded yin ASSESSOR'.PARCEL�.M 1061- 271 -07 Book _, Pale 4 San, Bernar ino Caunt�"- y, atate,of California ,R i *A *kkkir *i**4 *k*ir*sirit- irA�t*iE ** ksY*�k* *irk'ikiF'ul�ie * *��Zg *iriF*iRirk #ihk�cik DEVELOPER OWNER EN6I"IEER /SUR{iEYOR ts ; At Brian Smith SAKIE Michael F: 'Mc "Barron ° ' 8861 Strang Lane _ 1720 F(ooedland Street lk Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 Oxnard,CA% 03��_ lw�� ;. Improvement a•*�d dedication requirements in accordance uoitn TitTe:'16 of, ,the t9unicpal Code of the C3iy of Rancho Cucamongz ..,:ii�ciude'but,�eayr not`bs•ltrti to, the following: - i A. tredicaions and Vehicular Access ` 1. Dedication,,. shall :be made or street rights -of -Way Y and all necessary' easements 1- showw4 thc- tentati Wmap. X 2 Offer of- Dedication steal i 'be made of the, fobtowin'gits =of- way on the following 'streets :,'(as shown on' Tentative �arcel Map)'. 30 xxxxxxxxxx ;feet on- Strang Lane additional feet on 'additional feet on y. Corner property Tine "radius will be recured per City Standards a_ 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall`be` dedicated as follows: S. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance igr6ements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of j al�lonaion ' roads, drives or parking, areas shail`'be provided by' "C CR an ¢ 'shat l be recordgd� cdkdrrent w th.," the Map.' t ' sue, ' 6• All existing easements lying within future right-of-way are to be °quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City E::gineerls requirements. f 7. Easemeats for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property.. B. Street !nppn ents. lrrsuant to they ty of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the t-.ubdivider mav, enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building Hermit issuance, 1. Construct full street improvements including, bLt not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk,., drive approaches, parkway trees and atreet ligh *s on all :interior streets. • ` . A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide medicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - L• section streets. 3. :nr;struct the following missing improvements. Prior to recordation for Prior to builling permit YSSUac::ce for ` u- A.G. 51d`e °,Drive Street tree Me ia""'3 n --�' Street Name Gutter wmi, Chalk Appf% ','Island* Trees Lights Overlay Other *Includes landscaping acct irrigation on meter r 4. Prior to any work being performed iii the p -jr right -of -way, feet ' shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the` City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits re,4uired. 5. 5tr-Inet improvement plans shall be prepared. by a, Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the 'City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachltrent permit. 6. Developer shall coordinate, and wherp,oecessary, pay or the relocation of any power;`,poles or� other existing utilities as necessary. 9 public •, a ' 7. Exi sting sines of _12KV .or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. 8, Install appropriate, street name signs, traffic control si nS striping.-an"' markings wflh locati f'.. ,s and types approved.by the City Engineer. 9. SLi,eet light locations, as' required,. are to be approved by the SoCthern balifnr,,la Edison Company and the City_,of Rancho Lights shall be .on °decorative - pole§ with uidge ground" service. : 10, L nsrape and irrigation plans, shah be sut�ritted to_;F:and approved by the PlanniOU Division" prior to she issuance of Wilding perm .zt. 11. Concentrated drainage #iar�s �shaJ�l knot cross 1dewalks, Undersidewalk drains shalile instal led'to'Gity Standards C� Surety �. Surety, hal be posted` and "an agreement executed to 'the satistutjon of the City` Engineer and City ",,Attorney guarantee inng complyetlon of the': pub`1'��c?� Or'oyements, ; ^prior : to recording for a.d�or prior to bpUf ding permit' tssuande ; for _ X 2. A Tie p agreement must- be exec� 'ed prior- t6 recor`d"ing of the map . w for the following: Constr►sction' of8trang Lane for Parcels I and -2 taq jncklude: -:curb ,utter, ,R C aayement, s {dewalk, street trees and sheet I. tsi, ' X 3. Surety shat` " be poste �d� an agreement 4 dcuted, guaranteeing ' completion ,,of all on ,Rite drainage facilites. necessary for de ateriny al: parcels ta- he5satis' action of the ,8u ldi�Yy and ,., Saf.Ety Div3son prior to „'recording +the.:fii T�map. D„ Drainage and Figidij C6o1 �� Private s drainage easrmments for aross4lot., -drainage, Shall be l required and_ -.W be ueTineatecL_ noti"ed o�._the final reap. )i X 2, Adequate provisions shall be..,made for acceptance and disposal p'! of surface _drainage entering ttie�. property_from- adjace "n+ areas ^. I' The following s;� orm drain shall be insta3led" to -., the �s sati :faction of the# City Engineer � _ 4. Prior to -recordation of` the ,map, a hydrol ©gic end drainage ,s � ;tudy for the protect shall be su6m,;r4 ,Io to the G-ity ngineer for review.. S. A drainage detention basin per City Standards 5sha11 'be ' constructed to detain increased runoff } ­j s, 1,�,,.�' +� �' , a's�p �� ,33� fit, - lam” �►,�, � �s" . Y 1 1i rM. E. Grading 1 X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the,q �T Uniform Building Code, city Grading Standards and accepted grading practices'.- The final grading -plan shall be in substantiall.canformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared, --by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. :i. A geological report shall be prepared by a ,qualified engineer grading Pg° f applicatioi or _ or oiol3n check-. submitted at the time o 4. The final grading •plan shall be subject to review and approval by the. Grading Committee and shall' be completed prf6r to .: ,recordation` of the final siiboivision map or issuance of t ibuiiding permit whichever come .,� first. ,? X 5. Final gradnq plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building 46d-Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building 9 pe!-m1 t. F. General Reguireivents and RV rovaas is t X I Permits from other agencies wi,ii be required as follows: CalTrans fOr San ISernar'dinu County—'hood ontro District =.Cucm.nonga County Water District for sewer and water San Rernardi.no County Dust`Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit)' Other !( 2. 11 copy of the Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions (C.C.&R.$) approved by-'the City Attorney is required prior to recorda`,iolf, t ,f the map. X 3, Provide ali utility ,services to, each lot including sewerage; s water, electric powe , gas and" telephone prior to street \ constructor: X 4.` Sanitary sewer and; water systems shall'be der *gned ,tr;'Cucamonga, County Water District stanuards. A letter of azcepiarice is required. S. This subdivis-it-., -shall be subject to conditions of approval : from CalTrarsdSan Bernardino County Flood Control Distr,c *. f. X 6. approvals have not been secured from all utilities' ands :gthor . i!;fteresixd �'Agencies ;nvolved. �Approval of the rfnal maps �iJ1 . tie subject to any requ:'rements that may',be receivedrom`:them .� . rat' � -4- X T, Tt +E fTl�rtg of the tentative map or �approv�,l of sary K do s not ' guarantee that sewer }reatnent capacity, will be ava�la�le';at t t the :time"*,bu`ild,$ng, pet�mi�ts are requested. When building. permitts � � r are';re uestedR the Cucamonga. Count q > 9. Y Water District will . .' b not be issued un]ess said certification �s rec'eived n wr7ting: t a N ti X 8.. Local and ,#Master Planned shall be prov °rJed in .accordance ,i W with•'th�eTraSal Plan. A .det €ailed trail, plan in�iCatng Widths, maximum sl.gp k, physical conditions, fencing and weed,cat7tr61 , ' m and ap��rovhed by..tthe City P;anner prior to` recoMR:, •on for t Parcel 1 iyd ,prior`td bjilding permit issuance` for �Pai°cei 2. X 9. Pr�gr ta,,_ecardin'g, a. deposit _shall ,be posted wttt. the'CIty P t- cover�i #ng the estimated cost of > -° appbrti6ml g the'4 lasses 'sments ' < . under Rsse ?ssment 'D strict- 82 1 among' the. newly ,created, parcels. , , y K IQ, At t`he time of final map ;subm "ilttal,:, the 'fbllow�ng- shall be ' sub itttd ,�` T copies of recorded" maps and, dezds used: as veference, an Trq'T, A raft eeneed. v -- — CITY OF RANCHO'4UCAMONGA wCAA,1 STAFF REPORT i F a Z O DATE :. February 26, 1986 nn T4: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FtiJM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: John R. Aeyer, Hssistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENT& ASSESSMENT AND !DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -44 proposal to develop a- square 00 -InHu- atrial building on 1.02 acres of land located at the soutieast corner of 6th Street and Lucas Ranch Road in the General IndustrialiRail Served District (Subarea 5) - APN 210452 -05 & 06. Parcel I &.? of Parcel Map 4762 r, PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIO "S:" A- Action Requested: Approval of ronaeptuall, master plan, site plan, elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Industrial Use, Subarea 5 South Vacant, Subarea :5 East - Vacant, Subarea ,5 West Industrial Use, Subarea K C. Ctnneral F7,an 0esignatiorisc Project Site - General Industrial /Rail Served North - General Industrial /Rail Served South - General Industrial!Rail Served. East - General Industrial /kall Served West - General Industrial /Rail Served D. Site Characteristics: - The Site slopes moderately to the sbuth r a approxima y one -two percent grade. II. ANALYSIS:, T A. General: This ,.oreposal consists rf one single -story . multi enant industrial building that fronts on 6th Street., The proposed elevations consist of eNposed aggregate concrete-' walls, tinted windows with black anod'•:aed mul :tions- and a e. painteu accent'' stripe. This is the first development 10" f •a = ' previously approved 16 lot parcel map. ITEM F ItF PLANNING' CommisS1oN STAFF REPGI.`T February 26, 1986 k.. DR 85 -44 Falk ' Page 2 �. B. Design Review Committee; Design Re��iew 'Committee on January , ma e e ,o .owing recommendations: 1. A Master Plan be provided for the balance of the block. 2. Alditional lan1rTaping he included along( the �_itth side of the building, through the use of tree pockets 3.. Provide eXact 'o,-ations of walkways leading to tl ;e building erg rances. I 4. Provide an employee plaza area with benches, shade »" r' trees., and comparable amenities. S. Provide alternative color schemes. The applicant made the revisions and then took the project back through DRC on a consent calendar basis on February 6, 1986. The Committee,reco "ended that the mast(;r plan provide specific locations for future drive 4pproaches and approximate locations of employee plaza areas, The Committee `=felt larger, . common plaza/'open "spaces should be provided and linked with stronger pedestrian connections, ' The revised site plan reflected additional landscaping along the south side the of building and an employee plaza area.` Hawever, the Committee recommended that the plaza areas should i; be a minimum 400 square feet (se,:Exhibit "E"). ' The Con -Vttee recommended this project be placed on the next Planning, Commissiori agenda with cord.,Liens z¢ concerning the locatior of walkways and color palette. In. addition, Staff believes the ideation of trash enclosure and emp ovee plaza areas should ,ae rec(insi dered. t VI ` , p a should be l mated nut�th of its present i bcati on,t away from the major drive approach,, (see 'Exhibit "B "): In addition, Staff believes one, rouble loin trash enclosure .1 catei;at the centers (see Exhibit "B"), ''the of buildi.rt7's south 1�evatien to replace the two individual eAclosures" located near the main- access' drives would improve the entri_s:to the liroject., C. Technical Review Committee: This project was reviewed by the. 1 E: mica. "fFeview ee ``I) who recommends: that ;Existing overhead utility lines be p:aaced.tnder ground and tile, poles "be removed, 2) and that Parcel's 1 A be combined tliroLgh° a lot line adjustment. r d'. _Owe, b�^ 3i tiH �b { PLANNING CQ¢fi1fSSI F+ N STRF REPORT February 26, 148& ril' OR 85, -44 - 'Fai k . Page 3" 0.- Grading ommute :: _ ,- 4 e The .raging Committee has conceptually approved the. gr4rng plan subject to an approved final grading plan prior to the' issuance of b.{ilding, permits. ' E. Environment4l Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has'been comp e e ° y e dpp'rcan : 'Staff has completed Part I;I of the f eri'vi ron ental '' checkI s and founr h no si gni fi,cant adverse :_'� f - impac +s on the,.environmgAt as a result of this project: -If the Commission concurs 'w th Staff's firdings an issuance' ofd a Negative Oeclaration would be in -ord`er: ,_ III. FACTS FOR. FINOINGS'^ This project is consistent with 'the General Plan an e n sz,�ia1 Specific Plan, The project will not cause a significant a�uverse impact and in,addibion the proposed use, building tiesigti,- site', plan, together with the recommended cciiditions of 'approval,. are in. compliance 'with the Industri•a Specific Plan and .!.all other applicable provisions- of. thgi City Standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Manning Commission review an consider all elements''of the project. If after such - consideration, the Commission concurs vith 'the frndings and Conditions of Approval as recommended, adoption of the attached Resolutian with Conditions wmli ,be appropriate. ' +- ' .415. J Respectfully s0M tted -,; Brad Buller L' City Planner. N BB:JRM:das:. Attachments Exhibit "A" - Location° `,u Site Utilization,Map � Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations ' Exhibit "O" - Conceptual Landscape and Grading Plans Exhibit "E" - Employee Plaza Area Exhibit "F" - Master Plan Exhibit "G" a Parcel Map 1; Initial Study Part II' Resolution of Approval and Standard Eondittons .l C ILI F.y raw "I SLI.-A S7 J CM ry MO. rrL 5, i:: z�L "T CH . -CUCAdlvla-Gk PL �MRlp DfVWK EXHWP--�L_ 6 t raw "I SLI.-A S7 J CM ry MO. rrL 5, i:: z�L "T CH . -CUCAdlvla-Gk PL �MRlp DfVWK EXHWP--�L_ 6 j r IfiTa., th LL t LANDSCAPING PLAN T _ rte_ _ QD -5 q }..a r � L,• � ` _ � as F GRADING PLAN' NORTEK . ��x \� � —fA DM CITY CF ITEiM. RANC M- CL C&MONIGA Tom; Pi.ANIVM - DATEM EXHIBIT: SCALE- Plant �4�a y �Yx SLIM - i,/IM'..r. M.re s.+run �I.rv� elta 71�p.lslM s.tw +r+w �+•. c.wrar %,. ea la �. R°�T<jpse�,�u GFdfpM� T•Y u1y t 0!Tpa�¢. ;�46 Fro". 14. V. cavac. j r IfiTa., th LL t LANDSCAPING PLAN T _ rte_ _ QD -5 q }..a r � L,• � ` _ � as F GRADING PLAN' NORTEK . ��x \� � —fA DM CITY CF ITEiM. RANC M- CL C&MONIGA Tom; Pi.ANIVM - DATEM EXHIBIT: SCALE- Plant �4�a y �Yx d F n /d9 I6 err,if1 Cal • w K L .r• 8 2 PARCEL 2 8 a F—' ., !; /.1 i► t Na7�,d Y1' yp.AO Ir2Y ✓�2rl.Jrv� g aR,vrl•l.J 1 • ! ,��� PARCEL 3 a'v 3 i 77L a 1 1....: � ,v,o•aei•w rare `�� 1 i� k PARCEL `6 F,a l rr da q -.IC t 7 1 iy � • f' � � a � i a L I i g PARCEL 9 g PARCEL $ r! t Uri "� •.csreerrrrnrsm - a � env ere.WnRII.NMD /: -� i � 4� HO.'•y Jd IN � o X71. k � ` s � c.roaat• a/r.rx �.� row• boa, e' t a.rrx r PARCM 14 MC—M 17 ,y � �•,fR:� �° 1 0 j V � pN9•tTlT.+r4$[M <tJwa. %r:.`1� .�. YJ G . / a rraavr - I N9I,• 7, ' 9 CITY OF �T� PI•Al'+]P�til`r� Tr'r'� -E` --r- =A EX IMr: Gr SCALE: x, t Abi C 11 .OF RANCHO CUCA%0*NGA t PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRON:fENTAi CHECF.LIST DATE: � A.pPLICA::.`: FILING DATE: _ fC---- LOG MWER: PROJECT;- %NCB k4U!__��7- '%4��171�f ' PROJECT LOCATION:._ /_L,�—_/� 12916A/� I. EXVIRON SENTAL 'IMPACTS f (Explanation of all "ye:" and "maybe" sheets). answers arse required on attached YES MYEE NO f 1. Soils and GeoloQV. Will the proposal have q,r significant results in:> a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? / b• Disruptions,. displacements, compaction or burial / of the soil? c. .Change in topography or ground surface r contour intervals? d,. The destruction, covering or modification Of any unique geologic or physical features? e- Any potential increase in wind or water, erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? l f• Chall8es in erosion s i ation, or deposition? f g• Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or'similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extract"•ion and /or / use of any mineral resource? f 2. EiYdrolM, Will the proposal have significant � results ins ? • '�:�.�,�ayat `�'. ea.Ih Se'6� ..r<..�...;. „ .. -. w. . v :.;u ,m..R` ~ nt Page ^, r YES u4YBE %0 a. Granges in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, ephemeral or stream channels? ' b. Changes in absorption rater, drainage pasterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? j c. Alterations to the course or floc of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of wateri e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface.-water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? - g. Change, in the quantity of groundwaters, h eiter through direct additions or with - drawals, or� through interference with aquife•t? an Quality? ` Quantity? f h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public•wattr supplies / I. Exposure of people 6r property to water related hazards such flooding as or seiches? - 3. Ai �- valit . Will the --^i praaosal have significant ;esuits in: a. Constant or periodic iir emissions from mobile or indirect sources? -1 Stationary sources? --- F: b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interf_rcace with the attainment of applicable III rl air quality standards? ca Alteration aE'local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture ' or temperature? r 4. Biota — s t' Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in; a. Change In the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, ? ar number of any.speeies of plants? - b PedudC3an of the. numbers of an u r ��� or endangered species of plants? unique, rare - ?aee 3.`; YES 1L•IYBE �0 ` ' c. Introd•ctioh' of new, or disruptive species of 3 plants.into'an area ?� / d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production'. Fauna. Will the proposal -have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers 6 of anv species of animals? = b.- Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new ar disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier ( to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? " 5. Population. Will the'proposal have significant results in- ' a. Will the ' proposal alter the location distri- 1 bution, bution, density, diversity, y. or growth rate of the human population oc an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing, housing, or. create a demand for additional housing? e i 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity,, tax rate, and property values? % b. Will Project costs be equitably distributed "# _ among; project beneficiaries, i.e. buyers, tax payers or project users? * 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the -: proposal have have results .in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or Planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, yyr, ` - policies, or adopted plans of any governmental r' entities? c. An impact upon the quiaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive .recrearional opportunities? � •.......,�. �,�.• �y,,o rte. n�:� YES ;!1Y3E N0,r 8. Transportation. krill the Proposal have significant results in: a. Generation of,substantl-al additional vehicular movement? t b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new l street construction? c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? f d. 'Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion - systems ?' e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people..and /or ,goods? r' f, ,Alterations to or effects on present and ' potential water- borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ,• 9. Caltural Resources. Will the proposal have !� significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, / } paleontological, and /or historical resources? / 10. Health, Safet, and ]Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: N° a.. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? l b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards ?. c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? / d. An increase in the number of individuals _ or species of`ver,tor or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? xa —_ u e. Increase in existing noise levels? - f. Exposure of people to Potentially dangerous 4 noise levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors? h. `An increase in light or glare? • 'TT / Ct1 PaSd' 5 r' YES u41 S& 5p 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? / •. b. The creation of ,an aesthetically offensive site? f c.. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? j 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal "- have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following; ` a. Electric power? b. Natural or pa6`xage3"gas? % , I- Communications systems? # _ d. Water supply? 'F e. Wastewater facilities ? "r — f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? �a i. Police Protection ?' J. Schools-) ` k.` Parks or other recreational facilities? iJ 1* ilaintenance of public facilities, inelr, din S roads and flood conaol facilities? {, M. Other. governmental services? 13. Enerer and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results .inz } a, Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? ?� ` b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? $ c. An increase in the demand for development of $� new sources," ,f energy? d.' An increase or perpetuation'of the " consumption% of non. - renewable forms of energy, when feasible "renewahi sources Of energy are available? , FF, � . se 6 SubstantYah deponof any nonrenewable tsr scare_ natural ource ". =res i*x^ �\ 14. Mandatar+r Find in s:.of Significance. a. Does the project hveh th# otentia t deSd� e I 'f e .nvi ;onnent, sutstantil reduce The habitat Of.fish'or wildlife } species, cause a fiah �or- wiidli£e o '1�.��� y P Au _'ion to drop below set£ sustaining C# levels; threaten to eliminate a "plant or animal commupity, reduce the numner or restr1a the range of a rare or 11 endangeredlan`torapimal or I i ei m3ate impertanL ekdmp"les ,o °f the majpr per California Jiistory or grehistory? Does the project nave-the Potentiai to achieve short - .terms to.,the disadvantage of :Long- re -rm, ent ironmental •goals °'._ i (A short = terms- impact am the environatient is one which occurs in a relatively brie, definitive period of while ,time ongI te' m impacts will endure wei�7: into the future. c. ' 'Doest the �, projecC have impacts which are individua =ly IL ted� but b ; cumulatively considerable7 jCuasulative;- considerable j1 " ma+Is hat the.3ncremental ,effects of an ;iidividual .proj;ect a *e` considerable when viewed in conzfecti:Ou with the:. effects of ast P Projects,, and probable ,future projects) . d. Does" the project have enviro nmental effects which will,, cause ' substantial adverse effects on human bein s eithe„ g , r oireetly or Indirectly? II. DISCUSSION OE ENFIRO*It�ZTAL EVALISM 10f1 (i.e., of affirmative answers the above quesr.3ons plus a, discussion of proposed mirj• -,ion P to � .P measures y., i tI %S ` X57 iY,ei n4.�iw� A�RSffi" Y'J6.�+.� f 1 IIL DETE3r uT�ATTp;V. , On the basis of. thi3'initial evaluation: I rind the p ` proposed 'Project sect 'OF�LD NOD have a significant. effect on•the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will 'be prepared•. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant �:. effect on the environment, there will not be a si ri in this case bebause th e, 'mitigation measures :describedcont anfieCr � ,- attached sheet have been. added to the p DECLARATION i,;ILL BE i'REPAREII. roject. 'A NEGATIVE , 2 find the, prop project '�SY have a significant effect .^n the envirnment, and an ENVIRON:fEiVT'IMPACT REPORT is-,required. Date /. Signature Ti le y .t M x �? �i x "LUTION 10. r af, A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPVENT REVIEW NO. e5, -44 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHE, \.CT CORNER OF LUCAS RANCH .AND 6TH STREET IN SUBAREA,5 OF THE INDUSeRIAL SPECIFIC',' PLAN WHEREAS, to the 30th day of November, 2985, a complete application was filed by Steven,Faik for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the`e6th day, of February, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. . NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission,., "resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following cat.. ',q met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord,4ith the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the dr trict in which the site is located; and-, -' 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the znditions applicable thereto, will not be; detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or -i terialiy injurious to properties or improvements i'n the vicinity. SECTION 2; That this project will not create r,^rerse impacts on the -Wiat environment a— Eff a Negative Declaration is issued on February 26, 1986. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 85 -44 is approved subject to ;. the f -3llow-ing concaiitions and attached Standard Conditions: ,. DESIGN REVIEW: 1. The master plan shall be revised to ;provide common (shared) plaza areas /open spaces with sidewalk connections between parcels. The revised master plan shall be approved by the Design Review a Committee prior to issuance of 'building permits for ,'("Development Review 85 -44." r`� JYC " � . ✓fj(If(J NVf F ^. M. qd Y ° u n �y 0 '-•L. 'V� ° w° N.6 tl,o;g« r •- '•'� z 'ww ii zgNio n °ueca o —o •+ io.�.�.wY ° YNy Y boa °o: pat T C w O , vc 4 ° a e y ° o c, °V V EG ° y'1 L°A i Yr- 2 C w 4 i U � C � u m i tl =k p- .c Ne,. �Y.L a, s ° w' d'..�q e s w ®..-'r. i >a L°`�N COY V Va. pEE V p a Y.y° ° p ^o qqn y Y G J o° cn rn S °a da n—gw E.C..- S 9^eo n MA oN °qS q c �d� PC ��^ 4• G ^ LQ V o 4 Y 4 O G .«•.6 CC Y p6p d ttN ^COL C YM CNT Yr =. 6.0 qm. FL 6l -pfi ant; 0 � °� •I « p °PEA Ypp °�u � t �E. - �y W. p6N=QYA�°^ p t w > �°• r °cam zl uy^ SO pd u j NKY npy �: n RE A'yk4 YF• W �...� N J l ,y Jy PLANNING CommnsI'0N RESOLUTION February, 1986 ^'< OR 85 -44 Falk ; .. r Page 2 !I 2. Employee l o. p y plaza areas shall be a mi�i r. 400 square feet in size, and shall includa� trash receptacles, shade -trees and othe li amenities subject to the City Planners app •o_ 3. Windows shall be dark tinted glass and th.., I I accent coloe slate gray. _ I4 4. Bicycle storage facilities shall be provVed.�l�i� City Planners approval. �l I ENGINEERING: j ill ail 1. A tot line adjustment combining parcels lj &: be completed prior to issuance of a build ng 2. Existing overhead utilities on the sod�h 6th Street from t``a first power pol j j I Lucas Ranch Road to -the first potter pole jias, easterly property line shall .be placed ui'der�l and the poles removed at the developd,s prior to issuance of an occupancy permit.! a APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26Th DAY OF FEBRL1A1 i1 " PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO,rUCAMONGA BY: ennis L. Stout. Chairman a I� ATTEST: I'` IIII Brad Buller Deputy ecre ary k ,III I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the planning i;omami3`SII Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that-the foregoing Reigqn regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning,' City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of tf:e PTai.r�Il on the 26th day of February, 1986, by the following vote -i' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMM1SS10NERS I;I�I I ICI v ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 'A i .r y w6a N O�UD tC n 6 m — T e N N N E L -• - E dw 02 b 0 p ^Y EO�� d° ° ^O ^bN 6N.Y. NN L NR3d dL U cu Cd ONy ` t iy6y dUy V C6. GONE. ° cNg xVd oTi�.G T.= v +ice 4 4��9 Nq ML WG.G y�L L ^'qpy' Ems. L d UO °EL N o: �� Y•d x o YL• �N�.. X3 5.NU w .— °t .. Ly 0'V Z^ c'+\cG ;O. Q EN dqo AHt d =N v T -•c L N.y,O= ^q o I O rn �' Y xi : cN °.N bo quln �W Etd •!.� Ny N, �Q ,r, O:. V aMiJ °:c yC�'c >.y.Y d•-Ni�F u( ac dw. N^ �'. °y. �' d �' ° ° 'a oYJ i°G c.Y u Ya Y u no d FF V Vr�6g dd EU. L L4 bSLGH a' TO .°+"'" mi coo. q p L VA1 ERI gECEETa9M � C d c .-� io.G � Yw•r .�� ... 6N dtE6 0 ��yV.L u uq ° AE T G 2 G C 2 L OYL Z: 1L w w Y ^y N ^...r YM. Wti^ Nn r. V c.O.gn ... � di•.rV 3�. ^N G9 {p�qd wS d �.. C 20Y IN CLNYd d tit^ .y mi �- Nd Trc o po ^OS Ial:9 t1 N a� 6Y w 4 q M M Y N E '° E L u O .�'. _ Q2'o c_ c o N ° aF L f C <fLC..� Gpaq Nd.L GC ^ S N =N eu ryO d0. A d V° c aYi b yw N O� :b C �0 +O O dp Tin NYdO N Y T L 3 ° 9. O ° dyr x O o� a Y CY QL �pff Z^.Y eJ6 aO.yY ^ u0^ _a` d L.A n c c0 is 4WI N609y Vq xL V ORe` NL CNG S� NO NC Wm pw °Nya E^ wZ6 yq °p Nt own 'd Y u S °. N ° xr= _ � dLL of " I d a> L ¢ a„ d� m oa p> Y-2 �.p �Y::E }C P' N GYYOY v�h �-° L; � L �Ol �Yq. lajq O�ygd C+ aO -V 9 3x'xq 6 U VV:O °yp °^=�y.Y c'O AO.d ': o' °.•V. >nL0 HLL ^ yVY �,O CE �V qp r,cd CN y« C 1a ^O•q cYGaOM L9. °wo L ^6iC Y YrT� i aidE d °L.. °.nLdO -'a LL L °Q. _,o S.•. O LL Vit G Yp 'v L uaa p w N p QAGS FLNOY •R. --.NaL NqA °°O °raw d °a CV .Jr°6d qM �"CE tt N N C6M C LO b • N H N .,. F1. 0 q r. y G n CO• Y Q j� na 1 ti � Ab d . -.. m' a° .« a a..- Dd .°, �. u. o-•.c. .°. E 6`C O d da u 0 z t d O « r c C L Y T T g N daN cn aL,1 u U E Ny O Of •�� N N W O. c - A M •° n N 'n v d ti s .D N p �; (. CyV Lb N GN d� (V.y CM Aye 00 i >• d E 1'JA 0 AN >��d gVCL d y O C 1 x 1. C d d o b H n D 9 2 c L ' 1" Tl AV�d �1'wI p U VL y MC � Vd Lj1 N L p ^x \rWN C. Y y V) a b N v u °N n E n Ld d. . r � TO O E OO! N bcc _ L w c - ' N. N: 61Ti1.. QN 3M01�Nt 6N YT ^. O1Y, OfA 1'160 4A�.06 4v t...O ...: .7 pl 1 I'A- Z: z� M_ i 1:2 e d1-1 da L� O C b y d fp a �. p6L p°'O1 E WN do G2 Vqd: A. O. y b duo a Lo a �A,q N aSE Nc �.� 06�gE� ANVYb E �'�T _ gQ �p41 Ie p •' c . C ` p d ^ N .. N.oc nDC N a ai `�� N y. r d b a A i+1 1n •-- `d y DC u n L.n• dU 01y0 b 3.^ yr- >• Nb .SC > N b a D If T pb N e E V V y.j N N 'p d aL Y ,4 q9T y y. ...L6 AdO: a Om NL VY. d0 nC_ECE> N w u^ N bN oa 4d> u '•-° LoL Ha°N. 12A. n CT �. Ol a Y V q. _.1 OO � 01 c ` u 6M. J� UydL d••° -Y + y> C EE1Ni1 nod ~' v^c:�• ^tpV. �V� d O CA`mp 3 6bn }.CN 6V .9 Q66"O/ <N6A WC.G «NY♦ :Hif A. Z77- I So- c�! I w 'o 4J a IN g u I— g-. Z2 E o,::i Hl. .0 j5. A- -u t%: 10 oe :E Y32 -E _7;; E.0 it RM 9, s:N 2 .9t. g, g=- 's 2-= u F7-- . b 2.= . �. 0 VZZ tvg: 2 SQ�z - =54 'W— awl% -g Z.2 -.,a: —58 ts a iz 'u Z:.g 1. -u 1. 7wa t; Z'. W;; o lo V—c �g 1. 4Z.. 2. 31= R g f; A k cz 4 wl ALA- Qu �: F q c -¢. 1, ENE d`N m O t. j , ZZ O� v�.. Y Q a+ 4 pu 0. L Vin. LF d Q. at ° CJN O:tO L..c•, LEf y ^ 9M9EV 9L=C L tr ty c q.r. , w•O ei.. G E•^W..W E A •°°' C EF yp dda.?w -.0 `d rn9 m t c u c p L L r a n Q e q^ Cd dp d.rn - AUh' 1 d d d O F w u 'c A c E • G q6 I OL r Y Q'4 VO TN' N U7 �� Cp L.r �A yQ d � O OO�W QW N U46A QyEE G Ld 2�6L QUM r 1 to ed Lom 72 QE. 4.AYpQ y .. • Q1•^ �N r 9m... v � T Lwy °� �. ui CM r GNU r� C =9° O O E y<t d o si m °o ;' 5 u.� � Q2 N � d.•N V Y Na ,,.y �� ad a qY �o V°01gQ9 a�pa N i k pC F^ _E rW q d La V d V Rr dy d A^ Y 2 a `p A N L L a qT C14T G 66 G ~ d Diq° vnN °^ a V ' A ^ �' N N •�_ mil. � u� O'er N ti 1 d 910•CP ° cE'lQ�� C1a�y� T N T 24. a N ^L LW '° 9^ '• N No A >Q q m'A `aii ° `� •C pN ' I d t L q fu V py. 3 A Y NVVVi.� C 4. OAV v O.nr E•�`L �Y 1 %OW WHD ff..o09N W VY 19- 0'162 F Qom, 4.V Qd Z- QL°i Y.. da ro 4 4- d .;'�,'.• ,0i t rF �• N O �� a� 0,31 J � � ej`} N 0p Y,- 'i i 3 +� 5 0.00 t c -S ' 4. i'yy0 w O' ♦ `^ G N y� � of T, u n Lq r w N pa n�YL O qy y t9uSF N S N Q Z M - CW6� d !• N� Z LC OY G : \� a C� W Yw C � U }.E p n E u o C d •n Et eb °eu aW d • SEC µ"}' ;� iY:':c L•a_C 3 CN VEE p N Cw L w L U C:Y c w H CLn U O LL,T Y r d ' - �� G L L • Cl' G T d.x Eu•.d O� NL6 t?:� mp GL Fd YY O 0� L 3 yy tiT U 0 0 L 1A 7 A d E H O„ C^ u U 9r .0 ` u aL Y d "OGOIq yS N a G V YY L w Eb.. � yY. d AGM S� 1 �/I.GW 7� sW,NM 9:OYM JRa� SV.r.CU y'n 44YN1d.LU Sp �Ub G. 4 L OW d Y d— DSY�.:.� . a W , � O q•�y •:w b 5 -.ss�n z p cu .6 R •°-.:i �. :"�" i " ���, v U., ass u t �V aJL d 4yYN FZ wW N :� i L�NL G i� Ua 6 L 2 W Iy- O N w�G O Ili .G..O IZ C Yp d S y 5J. 6 SLY E9 Ep c NN N NJ � OyB� dY O. �K G4 CA > \7�� ( //� L �E p M 0 1 p Q u a agrV. G 1p w La Cpl WO.4 VEE 1r�Y•^Z Oq t. G6.,^ G N �4m �.� b� �'F X•O d.. GK b L��O a f. E= Yy EO �ydj C rG.. �.O 6 3 pbpu «�c T. w r� b.;. SFi ab��, ob��zr c Ly IE� CE =_ wtn (FG y _ .1lu i c w p LA P. z H W F w N¢ ¢ �. '•jam � _ .? d E .•Lbw r;� y l O C y C A ;_ .Gd o � E `w• i1. d. -272 � ��dG d O dP 4. a ^ v66 p p CL d y d'6 90 LN 29 L 1'-•L LRT d A w do N Yd Y V d d N N L p �` � •p GL V � LC Tp R ' a r d L Q A h s fu J 9 O 2 E t p Zwk Z. u p d y c 0 1 d u u a ,! N Ax n $ ol o 14 t .D � G� .4i d d py ye ol p d O c pG a mcv �A • 'd• mpg AN NL L�` 2 ��,. °o �. Lawi N L D• p dC O dn� y .� L ^ L • 1 W s d9 L A.o �� ° .`. r r Sr 1.3, •k A �..� Ro'. d m C -s L Y« L «9 6a 90 Lai a't uL d C C} t A ` Y ^ y q u N l O ° p d L a A y ^ d C A n J Y yw ° ° p° `•�.. a v. AL a2 •y 3� V v _ U R � d G9 L?.6 Y9 otyf ` A � ` ry JtY { wm c ^�• r 6 I V y�• q- u .''G..O C o d � d dCY A� ¢� C Y.)c, d � 1 ',.�G p C� _i 1 � G t n• may, * 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA �vcnMo ` STAFF REPORT DATE: February 26, 1986' 1977 TO: Chairman,! and Member 'of the Planning.Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner - BY: Bruc'e_Cook, Associate Planner" r SUBJECT: DESIGN; REV •EW' FDR�':' WT 12830 -: lTATION�BU +ILDERS - Design review fora °Traci 12830 ' a residznt�ial §ubdivisi.on of 21.41 acres zn the LoW = Med'aumw'Residential ;Distr�tict'� (4 -8 du /ac:) into 103 T6ts located on- the west side of.:6ery1 Street'; north of Base Lire Road -MN 202 = 751 -40. I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 12830 was reviewed and approved .by the4 Planning Corteiission;As a total dcveiopmentGpackage on December I2," . 1984. The aPplicatit, was the. A -PI eI�(Anany-. S-ihce,. this original ,k approval, the teni ae tract map has been recorded and a • greding , permit has been is u"tel Tne A -M" Company,%As soled thdjr•- 'interest in the project site;'oe.Citaton Builders. Citation B�iilders is now submitting te � .•plan, and building elevations for the - 'consideration ti• of the Planning Commission, , II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION- i A. Action Requested: Approval of plot plan and ele,)�ations.,. B. Surrounding Land. Use and Zoning: } North — .Single family residential (Hamilton Rancr),,Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac)v South - Skogle family residential; Low 1164de0 tial ;2=4. ., . du/6c) .; East - Single family residential; Low Res ioential (2 -4` du /ac). West - Single family residential; Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac).. C General Plan Designations ;. Project Site - Low Med!!;/m Residential (4 -8 du/ac) °> to North - Low hedium„rt2sl dent ia1 (4�8 du/ac). South - ` Low. Resident i'ai (2 -4 du /ac). „ne East - Low Residential 2- ax.du /a'). Low �24 West Residential du /ac).' . ,; . l A ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT` Tract 12830 - Citation Builders February 26,, 1986, ," Page 2i;. tt � . D. Site Characteristics: The project site is currently being' graded for house pads under the current grading permit issued with the original tentative tract approval. 1° III',. ANALYSIS• A. General: This project is proposed as a continuation of the development of 'the Hillgate Community product (Tracts 12238 and 12530), located mat the':northwest corner of Church and Hellman across from Cucamonga Junior•N'igh 'TSchool. However, a new floor ` plan (1251) i"t being;, added, that is -, now included as part of the availabl`e.fIoor ' plah , for 'the Hil!gate Community. - The unit f -, models offered as a part of this proposal are as follows: a Model Floor Area* No`. of Bedrooms No. of St=021 ` 1251 1,251 sq. ft 3 1 1439 1,439 sq. ft. 3. 2 1523 1j523 sq.. ft: 3 2 (833 sq. ft. - lst floor) _ 1707 1,707 sq. ft 4 z 2 ;933 sq.. ft. - lst floor) *Living area only; does not include garage. s A:. variety, of building elevations 'are offered with each footprint with unit archlt',cture of -a traditional, contemporary nature. All roofing'ma r'ial is propotAt as tile. .` B. Design, Review Gommit.iee: The Design Review Conmittee.reviewed;`. the project maRzng Sno recommendation, instead referring this item to the full PJ,anning Commission to c9hiiaet the issues of ?ng "of house ugit ;prix, and building sFtbacks because' the u -ti' controversy,;;'regarding thiSr tract. `i4'e Design F � �" Review Committee• did offer the following di1-ectjcin: �. 1. Realign the driveways on Lots 251 36, an 99 to eliminate turning maneuvers within street intersections (the revised';,; site plan dues show, realignment off? driveways per theft ^` direction of ttrs .Design Review Commitf/Ae)'.; 2. Provide upgrade treatments for corner si�ye elevations and second story rear elevations that face the ,treet. 3. Architectural details on the front z elevation be , - .should., carried out -to some extent,to the other three `elevatiions r^ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tract 12830 - Citation Builders February 26, 1986 . Page 3. ' 4. On unit 1251 -B, continue 'masonite siding to other side of,' garage and wrap around to :side elevation. 5. On unit 1251 -C, eliminate winawall and continue masonite ' siding to other side of garage and wrap around to sine % elevation. 6. For Lots 88 -103, the following items should be considered: p' a. Lot 90 should be a '. sto ry floor plan only. b. Lots 96 and 97 have both been proposed as 2 -story units:. One of the lots should be mvisdd to a single story floor „flan. s c. Protection of privacy for exis'�! -,ag homes adjacent to the pi ject: Ae should be a, na ? ,ir.,.onsideration i.e., upiltar,`;,'r windows of _ 2- story, units , should not have E di.�ect''`Iews into the rear `yards 'oF� existing homes. ' Site H , studies s x?srRd be provided` for Lots 88 -103 7 f .`r lots = proposed• with 2- story floor `•,glans to show hei; relationship to existing home adjacent to the south. .* Items 1 through 5 have been incorporat..d into.the Condi -w-ns of • Approval. Item 6 involves the issue:,of the; tract interfzce with the existing homes to �tha south Which the Design Revievi r Committee ;, "referred to the Plannintz Comr,Assion for final. . resolution•.; a. C. Site Plan e:omaarisons: The Design .Rev4'6.1 Committee directed` staff to present a comparative analysis between Citation's new,. , proposal d the previously approved site plan and building' elevations proposed by the A -M Comp;,,,iy "-as part of the original . tentative tract approval back in._c984. Br %fly, the approved !; design of.` the A411 Company shows more 2- story- houses with �.Y smaller rear yard ' setbacks plotted on Lots 88 -103 adjacent to existing homes to the south than does 'the new proposal. by Citation: The new proposal is certainly less impactive and would be \zn improvement aver the approved plan. However; with ; the projElct, as proposed, there would still be I impacts­ to houses to,.the south resulting from the ;plotting of 2'- stnry� houses.-tha;, could be-mitigated by restricting house plats to single "tort' models only. F'or a detailed analysis of the site plan con;?aris.ns, pleas.,,efer to attachments (Exhibit < <, J . D. Site Line Studie The _n Review Committee requested that s xF the applicant site '(Iris tudies indicating relationships of all 2 -story units plottied on lWts 188 -103 '±o' the adjac en�,t „A. houses to the south. >;he Destgh�l view Commiittea indi`czted > t � PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tract 12830, - .Citation Builders ,; Febr(tary 26, 1986 i Page 4;. 4r `y that in their opinions - upstairs windows of 2-story units should not have direct views into the rear yards of these, existing cu homes. The submitted site line studies indicate that for Lots 91, 94, and 96, vr—° %_from second story windows would have ` direct access into adjacent lots to the .south.- Based on the criteria established at the Design Committee meeting, it %� E.' ,'Review is recommended that only i -story units be `plotted on Lots 88- 97. E. Neighborhood input: A neighborhood meeting was held .between the project developer and ')cal surrounding residents on January,, 6, 1986. At this meet r:g;, residents voiced concern that house pads at the southern perii�jeter of the tract adjacent �M to their own lots were significant ,y higher .than ''theirs and would greatly impact both their v ..ews and privacy. The ; developer responded that he has valid gi`ading permits issued by the City and that he has been gradina.�Lhe site to the approved plans. Staff indicated to the restlkii�s that grading of the tract 'had already been approver?, but.that other methods exist to minimize the impacts to their hom',"s ouch as by controlling both the number of stories of units ;1rt'teti on these Tots and the rear yard setbacks from these 041 houses to the common A. property line. The following issues were identified and resolved at this meeting as follows: 1. The =-.perimeter wall along the southerly tract boundary is to. be' built per the agreed upon design with the A -f Company. fThis design includes a 6 foot wall, 4 1/2 feet of which 'will be masonry block constrLrtir:r with the top 18 inches to be wrought iron (see Exhibit "H"). 2. The storm drain easement (Lot "A") is to be walled -off to prevent through access to the south. Walls should be of a similar design as the southerly perimeter tract wall. A wrought iron gate, access to tot A is to be provided' .with the interior of the easement to be landscaped. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to ' consider approval, the following findings must be 1. That this pr^ ect is consistent with the Development Code and the Genera' '. 2. That this oil- will not be detrimental to adjacent .' properties or ca._,t zgnificant environmental impacts; and 3. That the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the s applicable provisions_ of the Development Code and City Standards. �;s th PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tract 12830 - 'Citation Builders February 26, 194'5 Page 5 i 11;1 V. CORRESPIINDENCE• Although this is not a, public hearing item, letters have been mailed, to all members of thef,CaVine Street Neighbors in attendance at the neighborhood meeting who left their names and addresses on the furnished mailing list. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that :the Panning Commission consider all material input regarding, _ this ° pI`Q�ect: If the I Commission concurs -, with the Facts for Finding,, aid Conditions of Approval, adoption' o. the attache?. Resolution would be' in _order. Res ectfu11 sub�,tted,� Brad Buller City Planner BB•BC:ns Attachments: ,. Exhibit "All - Location Map: Exhibit "B" - Subdivision).Map Exhibit "C" - Proposed Site Plan - Citation ExhV t "D" - Proposed Floor Plans /Building Elevations - Citation Exhibit "E" - 'Approved Site Plan - A -14 CCompany' Exhibit "F "' - Approved Floor Plan /Building 'Elevations - A -M Co. Exhibit "G" - Sight Line Studies- Exhibit °1?" - Block Wall Design - Southerly Tract Perimeter Exhibit "I" -; Site Plan Comparisons • Citation & A- M.Company { Resolution No. 84440 Letter of Notification to Ad,ldcent Residents 4 Resolution of Approval with gnditions s 5P l PROJECI I I SITE r I �1� L4,Z6. .......... CITY OF RANCHO CU CA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP 3A title; P.M. 88 1 =5 page 77" 1 A n�o�rH t� CITY OF r T RANCHO CLCAMONGA PLANNING DIVI:SIav ., SCALE =�:` �jj � n 4 X1`0, t L. V: A n�o�rH t� CITY OF r T RANCHO CLCAMONGA PLANNING DIVI:SIav ., SCALE =�:` O w E � R 1 . i l �Nf t � .a •�� i••.��yy 5 \.. � j k it l,�•�1 f •i. x ( S y f. 'V4 S � —. 7x � .•Y -� ty • 3c t E, � r`i F Vow IA ' � •RLtAr \\ ^f A� t va. � ,x ., 6 -� �t�it�,d .. a ""� "�+•„ ;. T�'x R'T�' `f' r ^' ;_ a �# �4f7 acsfagt�,�9 'd�nsr _7Tx i f <' . 1 Lr�O✓�:Ei,L"u FI. � r E q�e SAi .4 I � 33 {{ �ryryi I ►i I. t c � 1ii�PP €,e: i, �' !•_ � } si! i 3 °t G 3 S SygQ }i Pf }i�i• iisfi4t ie6P °a#g c i� a•j3 Si 1 a� :� �R$9; �` ' i $ie11' tfflii° qsill } 3 3 }ag iete�6�fii YS, —tl5 `•e? }SE. i,.e p� }3pp'♦ ! i� #.# a I !It lii59g' r�3Ai# e} S��iticl gis° i° gg�i��� l'��aj�e °aSq- �== ��L1������,..a. e sft,: �,z_ a:_ ses c.aa:a sssa !. '� � r!,� ��,k•k 4 ai -_°-' j j jQ t bei'.'i (� �v � o `3 �'' ■' cc El F ui rat ate T2' c �• Na •Q;' t I O i. ` l ` f 1 i il,j' d I � ILI tu I 1 ' � w • t' .�:. f f7 *ij a I 0.•I¢•,: hr F l e q La Q aA a W - \ tl) 6 u cr - t 'F �r• 1 �. aA w it t; -' •� ull ill a ! N [Ll I as =s i l _. is • a w Ed� It " �I . O LLI E-0, tu Ina a•9 ' fir lu � q 4641 r>; ;� 3jjj � � � I' f wt�•�- � � � y "� —" � ���� _ ��b it 1.4 �z . JM• I -i ss�� I I �� � 1•! ut.- -� t Mum ° t r }� .'IryMi, \ d�� Vii• a�III ' If RU V I \ •l t{ I \� C� bi al.,� y tl� �,j �. 1� � 'i •..� ?) t t Pr ' �.'i . � 111 � C � � cr r � � i; 4 x ; ♦x� ) rti ,� S r �. •y ��' � N 1. � 1 a t t tt; rltV �'�,'{ � v C "' fl . � t �I 3R' 'I s t x.. rt '` t : •tif r`i`i a! 1 i A Y is t rk (IL.. }i'LC jn Ii�e'},L` r 4+•-�i 4 ` rA t a �'.r I I .,�`. It x •, tP!w t.,'It�t k.tr rtati G'Lnw 2.I'W.( Pak la LU iL ", � _ � s _ •..� __ • -•• � L � :. ) � { r r 1 � ' / , raS .r q a FF it t. ♦K Aj; u =$4 :', •. q��' a i�s -'s: 5� _�;.. LL -n' - t_ �g a pr 4`�i -.4i +�.c •e.� ".,,. `,.. ;■ 2. rr.S; max., =W i, 1 ..s•t••.:- "'. S zn lit Ar -ISM 51 0. ,1 F[py��{j�' _ •3 IL it-� fig 4 � M i 7 . { ,� T C7 -1 r �_ s � r'° �!' f�' ' —�; Via• �¢ " g i .�• —',rya : �!? 6 �V '0 fit TI CID . Ilk] M f�_ -i j Tj r.. I lei I I I I I ta—.— L ` Ir Lil 6 S 1 1 1 4 ® E*h, jr AMi ` '�N3 •"e�.:*�SYe �C�..�r 'mss.. .r:...— .��:•�� ..aY:. .r .t... 'S` '� > � \°t^Ct�1a ' � 3°.�C9 •.� C7x'. � �o - - �: x �t 1� d'9P'4 �;� . AM I 41 -U"M cn ir 9t 'L Ml IS EIJ ,fir 3�g� � ,� � ®' y�� �� - � . • :` �. - �� .;s. `•_•s .,a.. •;i 1 .fit•. Cy...._:. �.� «<„��"`•���` T�aa��K b.., ...rt a.�i� ��, . 3 • h' ++.� �c _� v�se_ ��ie+•.+,r_ t<cc + �''" an-s. ..'•:� s''. M Vlsl Irk Mss-o t. „�� I fir `1", k — k i� . Q,lo� . LLJ 41 a H if lu I f - I f FIn h Fln `�t.rs�'�. Yi `����y'. _ 4t �•. � i �� ������ It �$'�,m i o CLLL ; �;, 0 rl J. i i I ll� I �.: � � r t 1 a � c`a ' � 'it Fed• I r _ � c , EEF t ' � v • oaeu�. A.c A3 ` s L LM � r. V•t ''"'a "�'i'r�+"�' ^.Fy't<`'"1 a"'t`+,���^'�r�sf�'.r• ��•w... :2 QX 12 0- - C� ex! 3 s^' M.1 CLLL LL Is - r I l �} S { EF } r r . I Mc a- FL R; 7-FID. _ t L a [ rrii Q[ R! RIO III` j p q� til►��pa �. �• I I I �. • e. a:. Irk k r I .i ll r4 Ile .�P� -�{ +.r .ayY,b 'ael ",,,. •�.`}i 0��9 ~ �.�.� i �rt'q � y1i#+�"..d , !16- M), U. T -7. CV E9 u;j S Zj ll, u f OF tx 1.l� t s x ^ K J �d r� t b 3 o t* ' LT ew I r 8 —� s MY 6 k '- v 4= .. Al I d a� �, y � �• .� � ;; 1'€ qty —'i - S i( —.I 2Ai ... mi •t'P N re � i �.. _ Oil le p •K d N izi. 01 s 1y } t! <• in LL i W `y { i =- _._. _ �� .rte ►, �'C , - �.. ` •r+ �. icy f li a A' h 1 i ` V k r�• L �. DUI Too il 01 t .�0 C h �.'. v T .-- /g. �/'y yp�T ����] /yam • -. �•� � 'y � S ' .t. Mai . 17. oil FS { I K Ptr103 4 a ag ES FUCIRLD VEJ]• � a� �i _ _fit �' ' Jr, .. Alm Q/ = ••- Tr Iff IED31 '3 ES ES gain E' ' ��r � file• ' — � x ' yS .Y .r Q+ F �.�•. i:dr _ ^"�I T ` 31F_ -, t _ _ -Zang � ti lab QW 1L1.ii • any+ �} �" AI xi ^ 113 Ito. IFf ui rx '�� ti <t 4ss : p .€� w: • ^.. _ .'� ._� • i ,,fir ... ,.awe -; ' 1 B• a 1 sl'f !is F S i ! t "E An Ldp "a ME.:i I!�!I[i` {� off,' aaa� tp, �p . ...: . . .. � / \ \ ^.>. . . . /� �\ 2 � \\ \ \\ /� ^ \ \� / \� � �� � ^ � �� � \� /` . . a� d .. . . . � : %� / � \ \y .. . ,y < ��^ ? . v :} z \�� y .. . �, . a ... ..� >� « y. � \� \ \� \ <« � . :..� / /� � . \ \�^ . . . . 2y y�� y 2: � � \ \� �. \ � y..t a . . .: /� °.. . . � � � � ,� g . ` \.,. � >§ ��� ^� - :a. . . : . . »� ®�� \� \: � >«2� � 2 ° ? � « � , : � � . . .. . / \6.� \ / <\ y -. ?� . .. :t> \\\ ° . : »� \� ?\ � : > ���� ^` `��� »..< y.. ' ' : . �r. «-S . \ »<, < . � ° \ �. , � \. .. y � \ © « :- : , <w }� � � : . . G<��` /�� §y d����� /�� ©f��� © ©° r k�� \� . \yam .w,- - �� 77 ©� .. ° .� ?� \a < � °�y / � \ », .w « «� : \ \\ \lam ���/ �� . ^� ��� ..� � I T G'+ 3ss 'Wit I, MN, so IN �111� ®e69t>, !rYYr MYYYee oma CrP r �Y44 a J: �� SymjSr•Y�L ! I' we- � r { dFin, F S J Y x ..kit -{z $., i —_ - -a ` w H� tlA rig ni E;i fl ?, ,F�py t h l t i r _. ,a y k • cx m CAP BFrWEM ' Z1dG WALL OR FOCE+ - -- —^ M rc LU lip _ ESOiBtiFit$SE{EIIGRAOE - �l ----sAPPR04. [ �� M1 .asnM Foorwr. � .. ' i t SEC '�'6ON -'A .� SCAiE: ',�, t5 1'6 ON .v._J�� , Str } SITE PLAN COMPARISONS ' N L Floor Plans: The flab'-plans compare for the 2 proposals as follows: CITATION BVILDERS A -M COMPANY Model Sq. Ft 3 "'Stnfies Model Sq. Ft. 3 Stories 1251 1,657 1 1 1,582 2 (. 880)1 ( 702)2 1439 1,900 1 2 1,688 1 r; 1523 1 989 2 3 1,840 2 (1,156)1 ( X950)1 ( 690)2 ( 890)2 1707 2,131 2 4 1,946 2 (1,414)1 (1,166)1 ( 717)2 ( .7:80)2 11st Floor Square Footage 22nd Floor Square Footage 3Includes Total Square Footage Living Area & Garage 2. Unit Mix: Both proposals show, an approximately even 'distriution of their flour floor plans 'throughout the pro1 &b :.ite. Since the :approved unit mix for the A -M ,Company •included three 2 -story units and just a single 1- story' floor pla►i, approximately 75% of their units as plotted were 2- story.. "With •itatien Builders, th.Qir approved floor plans show :L 'wo 2 -story units and two Vrstory units. Therefore, there is an approximate equal distribtition.of 2 -story houses to 1- storms„ houses. Of primary concern are the plotting oil Latus 88 -103. These are the lots at the so+4thern, perimeter of the tract that are x e adjacent to the; isting homes to the south. In the design of this new tract, sens';iivity is �. needed on these lots to reduce their; potential impacts on the lots to thel. ;. south.` The approved plans for the A-M Company shOO12 -story writs plotted ` on 13 of the av,itiable 16 lots. Citation' Builders has plotted only 8'2- story.units on the same 16 lots. 3;. Building Setbacks: Since the project site sits at a basic grade a elevation that is significantly higher than the existing lots to the south, rear yard se *backs on lots 88 -103 become critical in determining Pow significant the impacts of these new houses will be in rttation to ' `) the existing houses to the south. The rear yard setbacks for lots, plotted with 2- story units are as follows; A -M COMPANY CITATION' *y Less than 30` ` Less than 4C' ` 2':. 3 Kamp- , Lest tt an Sall; 4. 1 More than:.,50 ° 5 4 . 4� RESOLUTION NO. 84 -140 a; A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12830.' _ WHEREAS, - Tentative tract Map No. 12330, hereinafter "Map" submitted by A -M Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividiny'`the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a. subdivision of about 21.41 acres of land into 103 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and ! action on December 12, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map •subje,ct to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning. Divi'sion's c ,reports; and WHEREAS, the�j Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and PlanSrnt�i9-= >:9ivision's reports and has considered other evidence preser�i..,.',,at the public hearing: it it NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission 15of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows:: SECTION 1: The Planning 6om)nissia4 makes "he following findings in regard to. Tentative Tract No. 12830 and the Map thereof: fa) The tentative tract is cr nsistent wi,, h the General Plan, Development. Code, a {id specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitaole for the the of development proposed;,, (d) The design `of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial; environmental damage , and avoidable a� injury to humans and Wildlife 'or their hab;�at, (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public -- health problems; - (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict •,•;; with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for acco - through or use of the °,. property within the prLAused subdivision. (g) That this projec,{ w, l not create adverse impacts on the environment and, a `Negative DecIeratiort is issued. ° g Resolution, No: Page 2 SECTION. 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12830, a copy of ,which is attached hereto, is ,hereby approved subject to C31 of t',e follovi ng conditions j and the attached Standard Conditions; w '~ PLANNING: £ vl: The final'dEsiign of,`the pedestrian and emergency access: is i s#j,ect to , -the ,ipproval,:af. the City P'lanneF; and mu'st.6e completeda,prior to, 6e map's recordation. ,, ,. 3 -, 2. 10� maintenance of1the twenty -six (26) foot pedastria *� and n emerYeicY easement shalt be sub7ect.to -the satisfaction'of -' ' the C1ty'rlanner, and done prior to the map's.recordatian. 3. 71 setbaoks of 1 the northerly units on the 2 north /south cul -de -sacs: shall be incrmed to thecsatisfaction of tFe " City Planner; , 4. The wall-,design for the decorative wall on Beryl Street shall match the wall design of Tract 12414 to the north. The wall design should include a minimum 35 -foot opening at,the•front of the cul -de -sac facing Beryl. ' 5. Where , ossible , p , on 'the Perimeters, the retaining 'eliminated _wails shall be and: s ?,ope banks used to adjust i,he grade.'.' l l; 6. A drainage Swale, shall; hi- provided, along t!.e south' I 6 property line of toe adjacent lot in the northeast portion of the site. 7. Lot 103 shall drain to the street, to -the satisfaction of the Grading Cominitcee,, in ,order to -lhelp reduce' the •df: erencei in if ;,,,,de elevation. 8. The `evelop cr 4s5all make a good faitsi effort to contact- the suti:,ounoing.'residents so that_ - a common single wall, r „ay' be constr` °]cted the ”' ., along per.imeter :�ract property li 9.- The 26 -foot pedestrian and emergency access easementsj9 shall inclade water easements to the satisfaction of f Cucamonga`Countcy Water District. 9 tt' $f h ENGINEE.RING ` 1. Realign ;`nt of_ the existing storm drain through' the eastern portion of the project shall conform to the standards,.' of both the 'City and the San Bernardino Flood xi �r _ Confr -,o1' Sis riet;. The, manhole !Proposed to be `located within 101 '. s ,Lot stragll be relocated to the Garnet Lreet. right -Ofway tb the satisfactiwof the City Engineer. s, } 2• A modif-ied-cul -i -sac sha71 be designed ' and constructed at the- north -end of Garnet Street to the satisfaction .of the CityEpginer« N APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22th' DAY' OF`'DECEMB'ER, 1984. 'PLANK. MMISSION OF THE C'�TY -Oi RANC HO Ci1CRMONGA j, i Dennis L:Y StouU' Chair-i- , l ATTEST:— ;1 ;Ric# 'Gom,° 0 putt ecretary • ,;---- ,,\R • I. Rich Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the 'Planning Comarission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was. duly, and regularly introduced, passed, i,And, adapted by the Planning' Commiss.tr?kw the ,? p-' City of Rancho Cucamonga:, at a­regblar• meeting of the :P1,annin,g,Comm ss?iKjn geld on the 12th day of December, 19$4, by the following-vote -to -wit: 3 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, BARKER, 6ITI -tf„ REMPEL,'STOU NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ',' NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE .;V Al wV C�V ra No o e'° ab moo.. i ZD dW U6 d = «4 qE � b 4 « w CO CAGE E N O O� yv Ai C� 3f q _ of e � t �E l2 O. aw vd'o a. v O9 G F �I:Q �.E a^•O q.. _� � -0O yv ^ EV U° q d a ,.�b VSO.• 0.� t °. .�. =N = ^v:. vo �.° ...L °a na V n . =° Y`� Ega9 c° �i1�E \� vpN"Y V w C w 4 « ,.. n o V i c. v `t E 6 •� °'b dp q CANE 41 pp yy(, F ��Y g692Ntga�. ° OGa« 6.la dw2 40.gm Oa4 u ° ° G: ^.. FL fiL pLi G N.o.L d k ` N b °va � ly J ,r y L aEpp. a C ^ 14 ti q mg o ti V � .¢ � •,.(ill O S ir.� s K ° pq'� "n.«. 154 _ .4 °a -�f y., a, ^ b? co Abu p LtUE yOLC•c. _`f.0 •.G� .p.0 ~OZ °b M Lam ,.E EY ai, -:. wl �li�N. ^O +ca: �� � by UVpNMTLD Rp ^Gd QgbV br �r c L w o N b O N i� CY � b dN � L t10 b �� N N 'O R =.% ��.N6L�OL+n rf�Op a bN.. L4� w LbS win Y'•. ° ,rl; LyLCa Cam. a�TnML�j or act 9qua yyy T YwC r Ny'O YO0 yL•at aL 9LC GK'= L a awa L o� n r .N. a. b N L b>•.a D. c �'.. a. -ov.N .: Lq V ^ d q Y_ a E C d p w °� �. C~ L w O grNww .O �.a ✓Q b~ L a..OL, •' T O b 40 _y q<° pl�� '10: .�r1� b t u ��. C l ba y.F!`O ur"� 1. '° a v c U CN2 r d eI �Qy +L D, y Q.e yy, i y C oo°� o a bq �r LK M c O r T O U V c�c °G.E_ ^ q:�^ p u ^ G °• W.. ^ 2 � C .. r as v d^ r� V .� •. QX LN p ',°ao 6,.°.. L 6 0 �L22ii y� ° �c =L•°EY.�.. D pOE �c 6�� E�YQ b^ n L p 6qy 6 G b r V V O CO aaC ..Lh5n.p nG VC yw C-C CO �°.O n.E t1u�y ... AE �p C C.ti�p.. w •.u� ACND O u G.Yy. gOhL u O p. v .-`;� tea. a9a a °O z�F' o.� c' INW. G� .'�f -' Im w � C w qt N OLL Y a.2 p ^yn rp S . [ _ r N.�.c v. •o.. aN L =as ov nE a „o."i w.p °L le N .. Ay _ l... ° C.:c L �' fl, o ^ C O C O~ D G C o-2 p O. D p >,� i_. X00' LCD - �. �CvYgg +1lC at ti s� g J tM �6 v _.O a �• — o.= o_ c v '. t✓ d �.V y cT O Cam. g= e: p� 0.z- Q °d •dL` =u°IY Lb a�Ln, as _ x CPO ° � O, 4 c d� ✓. C.O� l �.�OdiJ .. Y C Y y S q... +OLD cd V •P a c+ FV N 2. CL° ALA �� ✓� a+ 'O M °yam LVU 4 Y+ �:Ji L.. p H w �^.• O^ L �J C �' .. 4 L° PO.O O c 2!=—R '4 L.0 F .N.OYi L ANC �M i t VC 0 °a Oa p_ .4 p ✓✓ qJ Can E L p�° � ✓YY °�Gp. aN r. c 0� E t C ya ✓ 00 y` L y a M� •` N a ad. G a S M y Y Ld N V R3 Dy C: G� wa 4 V 6 pY NCO t,O a � T NPn'- ctO O t N p E y Y.- C E N O✓` aN ` nr aq� n LOT �PddNM p r� Q. nd V` b Y ^9✓ C + u a bt OTL a E t Y.c aG ✓U Oa tic F a Y c�u�Q e_G'G 4�' L 8 +� ,� a� 4✓ GNEHY V a `Y. 4° c a� 4v Low6 w +✓ CC O ^ O Na Yt 44 6w ry J tM �6 v _.O a �• — o.= o_ c v '. t✓ d �.V y cT O Cam. g= e: p� 0.z- p o o C = . Z C 4L _ p H w �^.• O^ L �J C �' .. 4 L° PO.O O c 2!=—R '4 L.0 F .N.OYi L ANC �M i o u 'o� bv. +�tJp .':t ° aN r. :. o ✓°." L,J +4 - �. Y.� TJ ✓'E YLG ^ � Dy C: G� N O C O E b y Y.- C E N O✓` ? L 002 q GGp C ` ^a VO ^ 13R 4 �,°�. Y a C c N^ V G c p n'. VZ u + a d d o. ° ° C•nq Y C y� •y ° o G o C r:� a0 i4° ' y V p4 o "Ja2 E r�Y OLD r� C:u ` gib. P`. 'I�OO as ° ` ti i np� Ja I.: ° a ,> V �, ° V C st gLjN N n`p t'^ ^^ Y O V L q 0 ° N F d uuNOic.s Y d q U C✓ d A MM o 8• N { Q G -q9 7 a+ ^ °u �. _ _ �y CJq rn. •Nl. � v�° q c•= �o bay. ,y ary y N O C Vq �.yQ g �d .Y 1NyNy: •� O � � Y L Y tT e o'. c giL Y °p ^ ba `a ti 4FE A x a'..•'v g o q u q a ors u r-' rd`. cN - 6 u. L N.. � L C p E a > C•YU a'y b � u. y V a � < 6. u 0 C .... W W V. r G V� t� q coq. • q? Y- Q1 _• q.°r O LW ,C =p O 6Y 4 ��V u..q � W a�+d� c.i6 E cy l X60 boy �. YY.� \. is r Oq qS aC y b r q t •y.6 4U aq al z b: o O va su V. QC9 _n.V WL W @'.. i....+y u N °� iG zRIK a.. �N -.o .: O. g.q A * 8< uasaF a qm. a' v c o Yo qS °„rcu Is yu _ YY OY yU C bd`q V US O WNL qv O W OY a u H YY p 'r El S Fr 7 a+ ^ °u �. _ _ �y CJq rn. •Nl. � v�° q c•= �o bay. ,y ary y N O C Vq �.yQ g �d .Y •� O � � G e o'. c as x a'..•'v g o q u q a ors u r-' rd`. cN - 6 u. L N.. � L C p E a > C•YU � y G _ _• q.°r O LW ,C =p O 6Y 4 ��V u..q � W a�+d� c.i6 E cy l X60 boy �. YY.� \. is r Oq qS aC y b r us`= per. VV V. QC9 _n.V WL W @'.. i....+y u N °� iG zRIK rQ.6ir, p. .: O. g.q A * 8< 1 F °oae G V N VVVyY, nY °> O ay At" E "•• W � d O_0... W L L � d O �ua� O n � V O O I p• v M � Ov ;E an ° p p n �� rn L I p L Lr O O G E - w r E NS°a. of v v n L w E G N O O G v v Y G G G G a C C p p x 93 N x Y F 2 Cy I.. a a q Y O • p p g ro v v° C - -,,i Oy ° ° b q Y v y y p E E OY 60 U UE ^- r Eli r i a as E �aru_s ° °yn4q ` `ocga Y Y.c z z .gcro —:_. Lp30. o � V V Mi q• E q G T_ Y Y° V r O O• n E O N G N T V G ' L `� o„sN° ~ y Y c L N a �W v �O a s ~N t iY. Q•• V v y U.. cj .n.. .. ar n y.. n c „ v °' . m n° CL L� qo C i °°Llu w pa i nm° �Ap�� oc c pz= nY o w w'°D o Y = c N O^ L� w� LG .� y Q�.0 O yOOrn O A V C V Kt O 'q O LM y At C a 'ffv ° 05. _O O NT G nN Q` r f O Z t L G g-4 o. O O p N L a .e L a C Gy �+W V y N ..[ W.. OY E y� EUUrni � L° L� a Y r & °at LC LL11 3 ♦ E ti ¢u n y O L e e. bra an °' 0 t .� n q. C n m e as c f� v � ;n c _ C E • c r. T � L p a ¢ E.e y p • Cc L Or of I Lu 'I . e 'Co o t� o =L _ q d 4 o " L i v Mg, 2 Cd V 6 Y w u N i 2 . a' Si; o �i L C w.a rr 9. •Ui i `` Lu �qpe E i• aV -• uY z �i bN ..TE G. > � Y.G 4 7 o O �V `•.V it E YEA J � a. o= oa �•' � y .Y N'� <r O. N O r9� •(r. �'a O> OWN q'c M � C O p:y W O < p .; .4Ytt��'E p %fit, yrf is, C ICAA, �. < 0 CITY OF RAllTCO CT fly. 0i JrayorJ_on D.,lfikels � Gwnrilmemben ii G( Igo ChaplesJ.I3uyuet 11 Jeffrgv King Richard 31, Dahl Pamela J. Wright I February 19, 1986 Dear La Vine Street Neighbor: Citation Builders has submitted plans to the City to:build single Family homes on 103 lots for Tract .12830. Tract 12830 is a residential subd.ivssion for single family homes located on:,the west side of'_'eryl Street, north':of Base Linz Road. All plans 'and files related to this project are available for Public review and are located in the Planning Division at City Half; 9320 .Base Line Road. Office hours are -from 8 :00 a.m. to, 5:00 Friday. p.m., Monday throilgh The Planning Commission will be' reviewing these development plans and- considering them for approval at its regularly scheduled meeting :on Wednesday" evening, February 26, 1986. These meetings are open.- to'the pu�lic and we welcome your presence. Meetings are held at L ;s�a!s:Park, 9161 Base Lil'(e Road, (just west of Hellman) and begin promptly at i:00 p.m', �/. If you have any questions or comments please direct all inquiries to myself. I will be 'happy to assist you. We look forward to working with you as we strive towards the deveI9pment of a City we can all be proud of. A. Sincerel;,�, COMMUNIrf DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLA IiVG AIVISTBft�' ry n Brice Cook_ Associate Planner BC:ko � M o sazosaa �rz*r Os oua Z« A cone Ba RA \CHO CUCAtiIG +7GA, CALIPORNIA 917SO,.a (71 liG' 414% 4 " 89.1851 Y iC nc r.... .v�C.1 -t. ....k.�.i._ _ •c..m fi P f RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING: COMMISSION APPROVING OFSIfN�REVIEW FOR TRACT 12830 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIOE=UF $2RYL STREET.,'NORTIf OF BASE LINE ROAD IN THE LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ' WHEREAS, on the 6th day of December, 1985,,a complete, application was filed by Citation Builders, for review of the above- described project, and T WHEREAS, on the 26th & of February, 1986 - the" Rancho,- r Planning Commission held a meetin '_`o consider the above described 9 project: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resol: }-,ed as,,, follows: SECTION 1 That the following can be met,;, 1. That the proposed, project is consistent with the objectives of ,the General'Plan; and ? That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Devrslopment Code and the purposes ,sf the district in which the site is 'located; and 3. That 'the proposed use is in compliance with each of the •'_. app lirabit provisions of the Development :Code;�and 4. That the - proposed^ use, 'together with the conditions applicable thereto, :;will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or, welfare,. or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2s ,that: Design Review for Tract 12830 is approved subject to the conditions and Standard Conditions contained within Resolution 84 -140 -jj and the following conditi�,)ns: 1. All corner dwellings and 2 -story dwellings shal7,haue he s•'de or rear, elevations facing the street upgraded with ` auditional wood trim around windows,' additional wood siding or plant- ons,F.or some other appropriate meth6d, subject to .review and approval by the City Planner pr =ior tC the issuance of building permits, 2. Single story floor plans only shall be plotted for Lots 88 � ' through 97." t. }, Resolution No Tract 12830 Citation '. '4 , Builders February 2b, 1986 !, page 2 ' 3.` -For all elevations of all mndsls . ,architectural details on the front elevations shall be carried out to some extent on the other three elevations. Final details shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to the issuance of Wilding, permits. 4. On Unit 1251 -B, contFnue masonite siding to other side of garage and wrap around to side elevation. 5. On Unit 1251 -C, elim,'ate wtitd'Jall and cantinas masonite siding to other side of 'garage, and wrap around. to side elevation. 6. All roofing material is to be tile. 7. The wall design for the decorative wall on Beryl Street shall match the Wall design of Tract 12414- to the north. The wall design should include a minim �� 35 foot opening at the front of the'cul -de -sac facing Beryl. 8. All retaining walls exposed to public view shall be r provided with decorative treatment. The final design shall be subject to review and approval by the City Planner prior to iss6ance of building permiks. p 9. A perimeter wall shall be provided a;iong the southern boundary of the tract. This wall shall be 6 feet high with ..she lower 4 1/2 feet of md:-,onry block construction ',the and top 18 inch portion oil wrought; iron ' cons- !uction. This wall is to ,ie consistent w;'Ith, the approved upon design agreed to by the previoss> developer -- A -M Company. 10. Rear yard fencing shall be, installed by the developer. t.. 11. The southerly boundary of Lot A, the storm drain easement, is to be walled off to present through access to the south. This storm drain easement is to b,2 walled off on three ;sides '(south, east, and west) with a wail of the same .type o" construction a! the wall provided along the southerly. perimeter of the tract. Along its northern side, a wrought irosr gate shall be provided to permit ,. access. The interior of the easement is to be landscaped. The details of -the landscaping of the storm drain easement shall be included in the i1inal landscape and irrigation plans submitted for review,,to the Planning F Division. The final design and imp rove5r;nt of, the storm ' drain, easement is subject to the: reviev., and approval ,of the City Png,neer. .; h s Resolution No, Tract 12830 - Citation Builders ,, .. February 26, 1986 ' Page 3 w 12. Side;;;zrd fencing for corn(,, lots on the site adjacent to the street shall he provided by the developer to insure an F adequate setback of the fence behind the back of walk. , 13. Side yards on, cnirner lots between side._: yard fencing and ' back of walk shall be landscaped and irrigated by thy. developer. The= landscapinn, details shall be included on the final, landscape and irrigation plans submitted for the review and appr'ot�a1 o ",the' Planning Division. 14. For side -on lots at the end of cul -de =sacs (Lots 30, 31, 73, 74, 63; 64, 10, and 11) the developer shall irrigate and landscape that portion of tl e front, yard between the driveway and the adjacent property; line. • Fnail landscaiiing. details shall be included on he 1aadscape.and irrigation "plans submitted for review and,�approval to the. ' Planning Division. ` l 15.- The final design for improvement and,mainGenance plans for the 26 foot pedestrian and emergency easement shall be �.• subject to the appraval'of the City Planner proor to ,,the issuance of .but _, {ing, permits.. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1986: PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: sry Dennis L. Siout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy ecretary I, Brad Buller, ;Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of $' Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of February, 1986, by the foiling vote -to -wit: _ ' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Y' < +: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 7T77T'�� K71 t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � ��cnnroi, STAFF REPORT 1 c9- o 0 F Z UL_ , > S DATE: February; 26, 1986 TO: Chai,rman`And Members of the Planning Commission 5. FROM: Brad: uller,-Zity,Planner By " Bruce Cook, Associte Planner . SUBJECT:" P;UP 85 26 - THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY Consideration of i the perhimeter,r wa117"litreatment for a recreational vehicle" storagelminfWarehouse facility; appeal of the,decision of �P she Design Review C6nnittee 1. BACKGROUND: On January 8`, 1986, the Planning Commission adopted l' Resolution No. 86 -02 approving GUP 85=26 for a RV storage lot with mini- warehouse - located on the north szde:of Base Line, ;east of the" ` Southern California Edison Utility ,,Corridor within the Victoria Planned Community., At the public hearing, 'the Commission- gave directioru that the applicant provide .treatment to perimeter walls to soften their. visual impacts � So-,e, suggested treatments included the use of alternating e:aterials, off setting Payout to create shadow lines and vine pocket plantings along the walls. The Commission then directed 'revised plans to be submitted to the `Design Review Committee. The Design ,Review Committee considered revised plans on. February 6, 1986, and approved the proposed design treatment r with conotions.- The project applicant, is not in agreement with the proposed conditions and has submitted a letter requesttWing t„z ', the decision of the Design Reeiew Committee." be reviewed -by the }' - ' full Commissions ' f - II. ANALYSIS: The William Lyon Company has proposed a erimeter i x P p wca treatment combining split face block with a fluted split face cap and pilasters. The wall is proposed as lineal, with no' offsets. j Wall height is to be 8 -feet high. The Design'Review Caginittee, in their review of the project, agreed #Vz'h the 'basic des' zjn .concept, but felt greater visual interest "was needed, _so '`added the conditions to stagger wall sections and to provide tree iiockets'to be spaced every 100 feet:. _. ITEM H PLANNING" ' MMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 85-261-,The William Lyon Company February 26, 1986 Page #2 The Design Review Committee's concern was that the proposed " perimeter treatment in combination with its tremendous length . (about 1,000 feet), would result in -a repetitive and monotonous design. This concern was for both exterior, public views and internal views from adjacent private property. While the perimeter'from,�gblic view is certainly an impor,.tant element, how a" this perimeter would be viewed from adjacent private property was an equally held considera +.ion. Especially important was the view '^ orientation directed outward towards, the abutting property to the east which is a large, ,,vacant parcel slated for mutt i- family' residential development.:: In, an effort to promote design variety to reduce the " repetitiveness of the wall length and to increase its visual + interest, :the C,�mmittee` recommended offsetting wall sections to provide horizontal offset and scale, and to incorporate tree pockets to be spaced at 100 foot intervals. The planting of these trees would provide a vertical dimension to the perimeter to help balance the large horizontal mass associated with the tremendous wall length. The William Lyon Company objects to the Design Review Committee's AK . requirements for wall 'offsets and tree pockets, and.has submitted a letter requesting reconsideration by the full Commission. The * basis of the objections are• that wall offsets and tree pockets would reduce useable storage and parking. area and would present ' security and maintenance difficulties° III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission., s consider all material input regarding this project. If the Commission agrees ` with the findings of the 'Design Review Committee, then' concurrence with the Design Review Committee decision should be documented through mihute action. - Respectfully submitted, E� a Brad Buller r City Planner r , BB:BC•cv Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Land Use Map Exhibit "6" - Location Map' �• - Exhibit !'C" - Detailed Site Plan 4& 'x Exhibit "D" - Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations /Wall Treatment Resolution No. 86 -02 DRC Action - February 6, 1986 Letter of Appeal from William Lyon February 11 1986+ r KiD �' = -• _ = `Ka.rcwMb.' ••4j � "vti? �� uLir' V 4a.ssr.sv� � WT1P. .:� MH MH M I Lj g ' y �,� ` ! �. - titer 'l "�� •�.:�+.✓"� �� .1 }r �I . / , L iz r - "",l�C�r ' .WSa.i /�®awFrF. ;,••. w f y RR � � \:: V ,a'Gi�taF �orsS. rfa® s"s•: �_ 6� o, i RR i` - t W • Pq _ ,,•` K ti ` � r=G.uerawvacr �.. � rsrls C . G.a.s•a:1e _ , iiF ' — v H :�' �• RR RR RR g C ela:uous. %ri.MRIER.AVE' X. yR RRPr RR o r "AOL r ¢ C S i19 S ! ' .�3 ' Li> .o a RELtO�AL CENiEp'• RC_ 'P _ VIC 1 T A �:= t � -�= . I•�-,, _ ��`� ORf LAKES RR W E LAND USE LEGEND 1• S u, .:c.�'J ?,�T���,' � RESIDENTIAL , i •:/ RR ,A..eetror r WA _ 4 o . " RR w =y,. ulnur A u OWA 1�5.' f libiAl 1 •�taIDtaP� C. a.-= ow. so 7 .• V L a " 1: ' r• (` �'} COMMERCIAL • 4 t i O KGq+lt C[riF. ' ( ` � r[CWUY AlIArFD:CrrKFlCDrrF.Gl4 !�'i A i P UTHER USES } � " RR . % Qyt 0 h • e,als.rom! wo-rtruiA a as q f/ tip. rcc nss..us:.aasa srrra• � COMMUNITY PLAN Vol t }` A Plannedi' ffimuni Nv I t' in Rancho Cr ca�mon a f A ,_ •r� .«s y® ti16 SWal9sf,9t$) ow q T trccHwAr _ Ian anne,�s � � rev ::i � �-E' "' �• , � ; auY���•' R� •..7 !` � fit ,� ..�. 5; •r s+`S e• its i • ' :jl ca If i t 1 Wgh't�. 1 I E i' bE v _ gH t C7 o cl LU ~ ! 0 LLI IR LU ram iI • A [ 3 S Q a � IL '< 4• _� - �Y61 z z 114 j2 a. LU -: F ., 0. � 55 V cl) Q m iv a•K•w. WS I N hMv - suu aura rsumnr US Ct y +j� _ y S � i . F; •••�..++r.+ar PM a�aa aau� •eeuieas r Q SE u w. > e M7 4K..y Wnoosu �� 'x: BA wa.o..+�w 1 ABM. �4•�" r o+ t :!gamg j LI rMrKSA r.�x 9 , NO yy f �i 444 I J � ? Y. o+ t :!gamg j LI rMrKSA r.�x 9 , CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS AGENDA february 6, 1986 1. 17 10€;2 - RELCO Bruce w. Review of rear buildings elevations r Committee Action-' Rear building elevations are acceptable..r Siding material needs to be identified. Chim ^eys to be a- brick, block, or :stone material, not siding. 2. 'TTs 12642.& 12643 - CARYN DEV. Review of revised Trar,t Maps for Phases I & Bruce r.{ II of the Caryn Planned,-Community Committee Action: •Revised design is acceptable. lot "F" may be Necessary to be realigned to a more linear configuration per the direction of the City Planner. 3. TT 12642 - KAOFMAN & ' Revi-`.r of revised house plans . ,BROAD- .Bruce? Carmniiiee Action: " Action is to be deferred until more detailed house plans are submitted. ' :... 4. CUP 85 -26 - WILLTAM LYON Review of perimeter wall treatment for RY Bruce facility g' Committee Action: The basic design of split face with a fluted split face cap and pilasters is . acceptable. The wall is to offset ? it,, and out with a tree well to be spaced every 100 feet. The internal circulation system` proposed is satisfactory, v F. 77", ( i( 3 ll RESOLUTION NO. 86 -0Z _ A RESOLUTION OF TIE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING''; COND?.TIONAL 'USE PERMIT NO. 85 -26 FOR A RV STORAGE LQT WITFI1MIINT- WAREHOUSE LBCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE a: OF BASELINE, EASF OF -'7HE SOU'iHERN CALIFORNIA 'ED.ISON UTILITY CORRIDOR 1N. THE MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14- 24'60jAC) WITHIN.THE VICTORIA PLANNED CUMMUNITY, WHEREAS,-on the 28th day of August, 1985, ai complete application was filed by William Lyon Co.,fpr revjdri of the above - described project, and._; WHEREAS, on the 8th, day,-of January, 1986, the ;Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comnisslep held a ;_ -ublfc fi,&i"g to consider the above- described project. NOW, tHEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission, resolved as . follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can b'r. met;-.. 1. That the proposed use is in•accord with the General Plan, the rbjectives of the Victoria Punned Community,'eiid the purposes%of the district in which the site is located., 2.' That the proposed use, together, with the conditions appiicablr - �hdreto, will not be '��trimental to the public -o } safety, or wel are;1.-or materially ' injurioiu� -rrperties 01 improvements in t1" vicinity: , j 3.' That the proposed asd' complies with each o" the applicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Community._ environment an tat a Negative Declaration SECTION 2• That this project hill not create adverse'.ximpacts; on the $ i s, issued on January 8, '1986. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 85 -26 is approved subject to a ,owing conditions: 4 " F 1 I# ` Planning 1. The approval of -this ,pe'rmi't is granted subject tg the approval r i and adoption of Victoria Planned Community Amendment (VPC) 85- .i 'by the pity Council. with adoption of VnG.,85 -01y this project` shall conform' to all of i:ts requirements for a RV :. storage lot. 2. The mini- warehouse portion of this facility shall operate only per, - ' parameters of the definition' of a min,- warehouse as 'spee4._.,; in the Victoria Community Plan. 3. The parking spaces within'the storage lot:;-'ihall only be used for the storage of recreational v. ?hicles and for no other purposes. s� _4. Covered enclosed parking shall be, provided for the caretaker's unit. S. A master plan of trees shall be provided and a Tree Removal Permit granted. for any trees to be removed prior to`-the issuance of permits. The existing Blue Gum Eucalyptus shall be, removed along the project's northern perimeter and shah be �z replaced by the Eucalyptus Maculata, minimum 15 gallon size, 8 feet planted at on center. b. The final design of the Base Line parkway` shall tie consistent with the approved standard -for Base Line Road. '.This design ,. shall be included in the landscape and irrigation ;plans I`. submitted for the review and approval of the Planning Division prior to the issuance of permits. I• 7. The circulation system: shall be modified to allow functional use of pull-through spaces where a vehicle can access a space without having to Pack up._ S. Potable water shalt be provided. 9. All roofing material on the caretaker's quarters is to be file ;•r E to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 10. The on -site landscaping should' be designed Avitzi emphasis to screen and soften vis(,al impacts fran off -site views. 11. Treatments shall be provided to perimeter wails to soften their visual impacts by such means as usr,,g alternating materials, creating 'shadow line's, vine piantin;gs on wall,,,; etc, to the satisfaction nf,the City Planner. F � R AW t�_ �J. - 0 a„ P Page'" 3 12 Masonryr °4ia11 . `ire to be provided along. all ,.prop.rty' peri nteter� Wa( hints sha11 'be !!!creased from 76 to. 8 °feet for` ineant,4f ad`di tz opa'l soreW ng ,and y security. The all, along '!ti b Base Ltne' shall staggered to increase variety and visual anteresL.: 13. Final l ans shall be Submitted for the review and aPprovai "of the Design R'eyieW Goa ml prior -to the is,suanceW b6,1 ding eE , permits. _ Engineering 1. The developer's engineer shall .provide a vertice�J aU gnment s design for Base Luse Road from Day Creek Boulevardto Victoria Park Laney to be approved by 'the City Engineer `p-ioti to the is of�a prad��ngr,or bua'.ding permit. `The coristhgction�of, y portians of thhe -r sxreef' i'iproveinents may have to `be` deferred', until a`longerfreach O- %roadway tan be constructed, therefore, and in 1iUt, 'tas , !�dyment;to the 1City will be required for defe:•red improverponts. f; 1. The method :,f drainijng',,the site shall, be_coefpatibl'e with the I'll design o4%5's Line °Road - as approved by'the',City Engineer. If ^ai nose , i s to be directed to the south. as 'proposed, an ' ea5'ement from Base Line Road to the retention basin to ,the south will be required prior to the` •issuance of'aigrading or building permit. 3. q- _detailed rflood report for the project shall be prepared by the developers Engineer: and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. The- report shall contatr.' detailed inforn�stion such as . °cal:culations, sections, etc , to justify the propnsed' designs, In particular r< an indepth analysis', of'the method 'of, protecting. the :site from _ flows through the rail 4 oad culvert *directly to the north of thee"` project (`249 cfs shown- on the preliminary report! shall be provided. I b` 4. Prior to the issuance of a'buf1ding permit, the developer shall in= one �-, pay an ieu flee for half the cost of undergrouriding the. e.isting'dvirhead utilities fronting the site on Rase Line. Road. The fee shall be held,-for contribution to the future' " undergrounding'of the utilities within the project area. - ` - • x :. ru 1 - �: r � . { � `7 �� jai � � „�.,t,.! s °�� �” kla � tsi -9/0147MLYAM LYON > 540 ARCHIBALD, SUITE B. OANCHO CUWAONGA, CAr 14(730 (714) 480 -2244 L d ° Mr. Bruce Cook February 11, 1,486Nr City of Rancho Cucamonga Subject: Victoria R.V. /Storage Facility j Dear Bruce, Pursuant to bur telephone conversation of 2/10/86 we.zhereby regLzst the opportunity to review the�Design'Revi.ew Commit tee I- zecommendation for pa4kj`trgatme'xi s forrsubject Q.rojea ithrthe full Planning Commission at its 2126/86 meting: A 'us f` At the g yo �.ld .. � that the Commtee wtinCed "tree.pockecs" spaced at 1.D r`oot. in- 17 . � tervals as 'well -as oft seis in the east and west boundary tia11s.> P We dojmot feel Chat;,either, of these requests are appropriate design elemznts for this project for the fW _Ving reasons If, ` - /1 1. Offsets �1 i.. these walls would decrease useable storage 4l� and parking space while creating security hazards and maintenance difficulties. Uditionally, the seal - � J impact would in our opinion, be ins!gnificant rased on the- lengtE and scale of the walls, the 'fact that both sides will ultimately be obscured by development" o- and the distance of the wall's from high —speed vehicular .' z� traffic on Baseline. 3 1 fiat 4,E°STATE DEVELOPMENT ii? - ., 1. y �a° S �It1r. Ha } 2. "Tree pockets" provide a significant security liabiLity by pr 'aiding access to an otherwise.controlled facility " and further create a nuisance for cleanup and a potential, liability for falling 'debris duringr high - winds.. !'Tree pockets" would also infringe on useable parking and store area °and.require, further compromises in a f the projez s•!° security integrity fur- tree maintenance a A::- from within the `project. ; }° This project has been carefully .and 'thoughtfully desijned'to: respond to the needs of the community and the'Aesires of theCity. We re's -- r ^tfully submit that tne•.e,ar�e�signxfiIant problems aresented by - - wat'> offsets and tree pockeip,'and we. request, they be jomitted as re �• quirements'of this proje„G. Please notify us of confirmation of the hearin�,L�'date,'for this matter ti { x 1 Respectfully, •• �.' Steven Ford Project Manager The 'FTilliam Lyon Company , �Y A\ � � S b t �< IT IM iCITY OF R4,NCHO CUCAMONG.A �jcnNo STAFF REPORT 9- - w • v a 1977 DATE: February 26, 1986: • Y., T6: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller Cjty.Planner 8Y: Curt Johnston, Atsociate Planner SUBJECT: HUNTERS- RIDGE SPECI.FIG PLAN - CITY ",OF 'FONTANA - Planning Commission review of° land 'use `a1 Prfiatiwes far the Hunters RdgeSpecific Plan, on ,.:567.6 acres and -Within the City of Forsttana, located on the north 'pe of `Summa£ ..Avenue, east of;San Seuaine Creek; west of the"Gevore Freeway. n; I. BACKGROUND: This; item was referred to the Planning Commission.by, the City;Counci1 it 1 October, 1985. Three preliminary land use alters Lives were reviewed by`tine. Commission; 'how.ever, at, that.$. . time�rt(e City of Fontana stated that,'the alternatives would be Y comp';etely revised" after further research .,and-, analysis. "'.Please refer to the -October 9, 1985, staff report atM minutes for background information and discussion of ma3nr issues. The following sections of this report proviae�••,an overview. of the previous Planning Commission comments, a description of the, three +FJ nevi land 'use alternatives and analysis. Review ' of the alternatve focuses' an impacts of the project as they ;relate to Rancho Cucamonga. 1� II. PREVIOUS COMMENTS: /l At the October 9, 1985, meeting, the Commission stated that all three alternatives presented were unacceptable. However, the ,alternative shown on page S of, this report was least objectionable, since it incorporated several characteristics important to this City as follows.-. y M 3 x u4 L *Y '�.. x ATEMI , .� "f � PLANNING COM.% SSI'ON STAFF REPORT ° Hunters Ridge Specific Plan -" City of Fontana' ..February 2'6,�` 19'86 Paget q j 3. The total unit count of 1,705 dwellings reflected mores sensitivity to surrounding land use and site cons(�­aints,�iuch as grading and flood control; 2. "Estate" lots adjacent to summit Avenue and San Sevaine Creek provide a transition to the half acre lots south of the ' project site in 'Rancho Cucamoncda.and'the. potential Regional '. Park along San Sevaine Vash. 3. The circulation system provides for access to Duncan Canyon, rathar than emphasizing Summit and Cherry Avenues; " 4. No commercial zoning is provided, and r 5. The mix of dwelling unit types - (single- family versus multi - family) is in r g:: _ y more tune with= future .development in the area. In addition to 'commenting on the alternatives, the Planning td Commission provided the following general concerns: 1. Pveservation and sensitivity to existing natural features, land forms, and historic features on the site, sf.buld be considered,. particularly in regard to mature vegetation such as Eucalyptus trees' and grading; 2. The project design should consider, site constraints and limitations presented by natural hazards such as slope stability, flooding, seismic conditions, wind turbulence, aitid wild land fire; 3. East /West access north of 24th Street, connecting the .site to Mt .' the west as established in the West Valley Foothills Plan, should be reviewed; 4. The project design should integrate the future San Sevaine' Creek, Regional Park through appropriate orientation and undue use transition; and , 5. Aogionai trail connections as outlined' on,-the City's General' Plan and West Valley Foothills Plan should be provided'. ;t :;T` ".e PLANNING COMMISSISTAFF ON S REPORT a Hunters Ridge Specific Plan - City of Fontana February, 26, 1986 ► Page #3 Y � S7f)n: 3�'7U N9 L7 7)�17yq� `9b tifp M► 151 " i ! lCBkrdaL" �iif 4St lid- ?.9 - - 4 aueu►xcis FS> qG7 k0 ex} °�I a i� 1 _ PAW ,� k t \. VX 7DI ummeib. evm K� i- Mw {YAW llaa INbY //f - r .Ip /,0 M � Ol Is PLANNING COMMISSION 'STAFF REPORT- ` Hunters Ridge, Specific Plan.- City of Fontana February 26, ;1986 r Page #4 III..LAND USE ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives reviewed last October < represented a range of design concepts with the number of units varying from 1,705 to 2,141 dwellings. In contrast', th�z,,proposals now presented are all very `similar, particularly in regary,to unit count, product mix, and, rrima- circulation,. Apparently;:, these alternatives are more deflective of the developer's it,tent.- Without going into the spticifcs of each - .alternative, the" unit counts range from 1,930 (5 5 du /ac average density) up,,.;'.-j' 2,075 (6.0 du /ac `density) average he typical unit, mix is rdughly 35 multi- €amity and 659'singl,e family. Of the single- family units, 40 to 50% have a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, while only 3% range from 10400 ' t1 \,15,000 square feet. The three 'land use alternatives are shown at the end of this report. Alternatives One and Two are very similar in _-ncept with ` a central core.of multi - family units and single - family lots around the perimeter of Up, project. �By contrast, Alternative Two °a proposes multi- f'ajnily p ^its a'; the southeast corner of the project along Summit Avenue and the 'clevore. Freeway. A 5 acre commercial site is provided along,the' extension of Cherry, % Avenue, north of Summit. r A feature similaw.in all three alternatives is the realignment of - the Hawker Crawford Channel to "the south perimeter of the project (on the north side of Summtst Avenue);,a regional trail adjacent to San Sevaine wash Viand along the northerly utility corridor; a 13 acre equestrian center; primary access to Duncan Canyon to thez, r east, aqd,. single-family lots rangjng in size from 10,000 square feet is 15,000 square, feet at the north end of the site in San Sevait a anyan. IV. ANALYSIS: The majority of comments presented in October still' apply with the exception that primary circulation to 0n east be will provided, and 'the design .does consider the future San Sevaine Regionai Park,(pedestrian trail, landscaping, and side -on cul -de- sacs open to the wash) Equestrian trails should also. be a• provided along the west boundary of the ;project anu- `within the utility corridor connecting to the equestrian center. Regarding Alternative Two, the multi- family units along Summit Avenue and the freeway may establish „a undesirable precedent for development along I -15, as well as impact the rural character 'of the area.. fir- �j PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Hunters Ridge Specific Plan - City of Fontana February 26, 1986 Page #5 Few design details of the plan were provided with the alternatives and are: "attached to this report. The Community Structure Plan (Exhibit "D") provides further detailing of Alternative Two, which may mean that it is the preferred alternative. Notes on Ear;.ibit "O -1" state that lots _will be terraced to provide views and windrows will be reintroduced. Basically, this is indicating that the natural features of the site will be substantially altered and existing mature vegetation removed. Given the intensity of the development, Cherry Avenue south of the site will require improvement beyond the 44 foot curb. -to -curb width specified in the Etiwanda Specific. Plan. Added runoff from the site and with realignment of the Hawker- Crawford Channel will also require major improvements of Summit Avenue where it crosses San Sevaine wash. Both of these items must be prov-rded for with development of the site. In addition, maintenance provisions are necessary for landscaping and trails along the perimeter of the project, particularly on Summit Avenue. In summary, the major concerns regarding the alternatives appear to be as follows: 1. The overall- density is high given site constraints and the rural character of the area, 2. The intensity of multi- family units along 1 -15 and commercial development will establish an undesirable image or precedent F for future development on surrounding property. 3. Natural features of the site will be significantly altered by the plan, ;i 4. Equestrian trails should be located adjacent to San Sevaine wa 4. S. Improvement costs directly related to the project, but within s, Rancho Cucamonga, ,must be provided by the developer and;u'r the City of Fontana. 6. Alternatives One or Three, with larger, dots along the southern boundary of the project and no commerical facilities, are least objectionable. ., V. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission should review the proposed alternatives as they relate to the City of 'Rancho Cucamonga. Comments should be referred to the City Council by: ; nE minute action for their review on March 19, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF ,REPORT '` Hunters .Ridge Specific' Plzn,. : City of Fontana February 26, 1985 y' Page #6 � nM Respectfully submitted „ Brad Bul er n City Planner a BB :CJ•,cv AttachrAJ'nts: Exhibit A - Alternative 1 - E4hibit B - Alternative 2 Exhibit C •Altcrnative:1 Exhibit D Design Sketch for Hunter's Ridge" -' October 9, 1985, Plan^- nngiTormnission Staff'Report Planning Comm.iss'ian Minuti= October 9, 1985 aw t a I SUMMARY • l a _ -• t �S - J • it *., TSC•a ih7 /FC AC Mrs _ •`l .`� t - Estale papal 2.0... J1.5. 63 ! f �..r• t.,J'•r� 1 7::�. 7200 34 350 12Z 1. ' • I{ . 1 "' r `_� — i. v -`:.. •:,r ^�1 6000 45 99.0 446 f•000 5.0 130.0 453 :ro • i r • ( t I rl •S W Br F An d D INO NAT IO NAL FORF dIf, �r -WtK a 12.0 I x7.0 25 2 ` Apartments 20.0 27.0 $40 rw '{ * i • 4 ".+'t E t •f.11 1 IA SUBTOTAL 344.0 2.Q76 Equstrian Center 13,9 AtC (mi —AY ) Afre 0lrsl • 1 N t f• { 3; •'�_ a .t I c n`y ' l'Fi� rr�s4 School/Park 1315. AC I :'*T° Open Space /73.6 AC Matot Road 23.5 AC r r rr 1 ex7AtE r t t; ' 1! rt.�.•- b4 ° R Yi TOTAL. 567.1. Al .f .�• ( 62.W 1'• . �..••1 n L +- •' ` j){r. •sir ke92pnai Team a s r r, PGIT tTra4 SPACEp r ^ P r {. �•...: r { COWSTMA 7:00 r 3 �i2DAC ( PAC J i tt(r {r{ (LMaw�rt1 {RnMeI i t���t�tr••.. � , `\A� 2DU— e��(,��FN • Eauleua0o. m. ItA00 -1l,WO V('fvL., S e M AC 15,000 a 1200 a2w"soo- nua SAN SEV;kk WA 5M *T )�y..l ti� • "/� ` '. tow 7200-4400 7x! ! -1 A6D AC f 4 4 i r .1000 6000.1000 0 Adak L 03. A, MF 216 DU I7 APAPTM[Nr5 i rj' r 27.4 EC 1. _rrr }ry •• F +.. ti r• �ff s r t r(. r 1..,,• z� °u 'p so ' •.ra ��t .. 1` .�7D�wroaues i. { � . � ` /4�� `'• • ;r:.` •,t,• %x,`�_ f ty '210Ar I �) t I .... .j 232 iw m.: ols �' ' 7 _ •1�.' 72pc � %j • sue'— A '.� ; + • ' ; fIXlf A •n1- /95AG• •� 9000 000 {. . 3 64 C9 SLOAC r MAC .. � rJC OLL,}r • Y;� Too all V. ti t1Z . t I •�( / •lea :1 issou 1 z :EiE7ENT10N 9ASIN v A SPECIFIC ALAN'•' �� r HUNTERS RIDG('fir PREPARED BY THE E t IC(TY OF FGNTANA � YYY [ "- "-'6' • - SUMMARY • s ( ..0 ' Product T 4T • , 1 e/ 1 Type DWAO AC i > , >• t1 -. E3tatplmmm 2.0 3L5 63. 9 • ,1A t / , / 7200 3.L 45.5 154 'e s • 1` (! ` , ,J ti..,.•. > 1900 4.` 906.5 480 •+ �'\ �.!', +. i. '1 = �' 5000 5.0 1945 573 ' d (' -SAN 9ERNA40INO NATION4 MRft%' T: o-...romos.' 12.0 31.0 372 1• 'i; I ' ^ s.• ' . f r ,'„ ,n Apartmenis 20.q 2�0 400. SUBTOTAL 349.0 2,047- •-'� - . '` 2 . , %s w..nr.m n:0eenaet t. CYST Open Spam - 967.8 AC 1 �' ♦a / it ,S ♦,• 1 School /ParR 12.5 AC I r Equestrian Center 93.0 AC a ,l � �� y 1 •'". f +'._, :,y MaJpr Agart 20.5 AC E5TATE ,' r l U/ oA G,,.- cerclal 5.0 AC • 31.5 AC• �.�• •i � `7 -TOTAL 56.'.6 AC Regional Trait e .. } ..•" `.•. i f•...Prpiect Trait S . ; A •_.�•^ Ate•_. OPEN SPACEt± - a. .. s t•s.I rre Y ,/3 "015 s%.`-� • 1•A• r •; IE066TRIAN �aENTm I i 2M���. i { i/gwu+ml NASq l ('ar.OA) A _ 2 o Aci , b _ 1 II P1n S,te f Lel s,te LorS.+• ( 1150 AG ( 94 ( � i• 1 �•(' y Eal.lelteaopl 11 Oa0- /S.OYJ MelaA00 { (6e pUT� W f! Y (� ,• �l 7200 9200.9500 e0S0 (. •. i,`' 6000 7200-9A00 i90J SAN SEVAINE WASH +�+.s�c��.. --I�` 1 ' T �- 4 ( r _ 5000 6050 -7500. 9500 133 DU sow 203 AC EE 1^ t - �. _�i l'RIC[i �ASIiJ• ,, I 1 - i , SCHOOL/PARK )) C i 27.5 AC , 1 •', I 12.5 AO t• 75 Off ` i, . • • .• O /5. 11 OPENSPACE r , 9/S •'wl�I $coo 1 ••.6000 TN •.1 . I 19.OAG:/ i 73A AC _- i 31 90 t1U. •/ W 159 MO AC ou, -t • 9000 LA •x• s • 37.0 AC CORN. E )00 APART Its. 290 AC t0.0 AC , .. / �. • l 1.0 W _ -.'1L 200 WAI'• W. \ f 5000 � A 71.0 AC , �MTYENTS�� 5(� 1 OTI(A ROA C r%. ` f I TIOMES 00 - • 1 105 ou 19oAc ':t9ETENTION.BA81 1 ;1. 57tO AUERHA179\7 HUNTERS lA;SPECIFIC Pj, A!V' M., - PREPARED 13)';' THE u� - a i ��"�=1TY OF THE +: �� SUMMARY Product rt' Type DU /AC AC D;fS Estate uaaaol 2.0 31.5 63 • ( •t` 1 .1+. 7200 3.5 54,0 189 .. ti.' {.. 1 T ' . , i '•>•` 0000 4.5 1295 584 . 5000 510 49.5 498: ' • : 'Y SAN BERNAROINO NATIONAL MRSaT " 1a 7ownhomes 120 1 &0 216 Apartments 20.0 19.0 380 SUBTOTAL.- 351.5 1,930 Ana{ (2.180 OU'S) .. ' i 1 1551 r~ School /Park 13.0 AC Open Space 169.4 AC •:,l s ` Major Road 20.7 AC 1 ' ti •r� `� " 1 1.41.. ex '� EWestriaN. Comer 13.0 AC ESTATE 1 .� ais Ac c:• 1 �: TOTAL 567.6 AC ...� Re9ionel Trait k' r 1 ` ['•_' 'Project Trait C a. t s• • SriA S N /• OPEN SPACE t r o I' f r ors .. P ... - 1 CENTER I • - y .'. , CEHrEn 103 011 �I � •) :.. 1M�n�mu t . - r (N 9 / to 911 i !!el PsE Srsa Goss rut Siea ..rasa � iao:�c. ael are. v y)1�s• ]111• Eslalellnmos st•o °o- 15,0°0 13.000 1150. AC l`/ t, rxoo (e OUT.. e200-3300 asap ee000 rxoo -eAOO paoo APIAsN.O TMENS SAN SEVANE WASH 'A i Soo 6noo -l000 6300 00 - i� j�pj7y�� A ^.'3000 ��• " t { :..: Sf . r '^ 201YNNOME .�j�° AC 4 - \''� •ISO a,c E 5 ..160 oU 1r NCH BASIM i s000 216 oU f , 41 DU , •OPEN SPACE ! _ ' ` r _ O t PEN SPACIE -(�� s _ S�p100VPAAK 7200 13.0 AC 5000 ,- ^� 4ZZ AG GODO Art J Q t of • 221 ou i i °000 t, 2ou €W, _ 1 � � 1µt r� , ` i ` � wr ,..w• � —�'' -' _ x AL�'�C nD HXrOV } I �A SPECIFIC PLAN � 4 HUNTERS: ��t� i [ i�� (PREPARED BY THE � 1 lt�J� CITY Y OF FONTANA w X 4. 7w,:-: Ewa on5 F4W6 ew c ��,tsv cD,vcEpT� . — Cn(�,��OIr��l E 4 -3 .mss. ...,.e... . , ... s ... .K..,,u . _ MG F «nnn..t..o.cuss � Iwnes,onu..uesssa. . HUNTERS RIDGE crrtrorrowAtACauwMu 1VORT 4 V CI' OF Thu., S: F -� Al` 1 IG D ESK EX) OT. - SCA �x 1' ` � I � SAw TRPMYmM �W4f0.Yl • I• PEDESTRIAL TRAIL - STREETS OPEN �_, •� [STALE - � TO TRAIL REGIONAL. EOUESTRIAN CENTER (r� SECONDARY PROJECT ENTRY sAns3vuE w.,x wTEa. J� SPECIAL THEME %JTERSECTIONS Palm trees, special lighting EEC REINTRODUCTION OF WINDROWS' ••!' � �'-ri .I •, }•� _ ...111 << , LOTS TERRACED WITH CONTOURS TO N OU S R PROVIDE 1t1EWR � t r EASEMENTS IMPROVED t� �y _— y- �`°_'_' -"• _a. xu.. '.t'(rH LANDSCAPE' r' Y 3030 ; v PALM TnEE' ENTRY ROADS triangularly space Palm trees pedestrian trail expanded r.o.w. to craete grand scale place up lights on trees at intersections RELOCATED HAWKER CRAWFORD CHANNEL ` �4 s off- street bike trail �'�• cl, expanded greenbalt,I Y trees and turf adjacent to street rlP -rap edge planted base of channel internal pedestrian trail to connect °• front door image with landscaping, ` PRIMARY PROJECT ENTRY trees and turf v simulated gate house walls, night lighting FOREGROUND LANDSCAPING TO HELP cross over bridge to project entry river rock pilasters SCREEN HOMES IN BACKGROUND t Palm trees up- lights HUNTERS RIDGE CITY OF FONTANA, OA RAISUM C --` ` MID PC.ANNiNG d�ZSM .-�- t, EXHIBIT:. SCALE: -- --_- -- .: p � STONE PILA5TER,'IN ' > Ak MEDIAN TO CREATE a ^ SENSE OF ENCLOSURE r ; Q r LARGE ENTRY PILASTER vJ u' WALL W /WALL OF ' ACCENT PAVING. - '� COMPLIMENTARY COLOR PALM TREES- -TAIL VERTICAL i 4. ELEMENT TO CREATE I FURTHER SENSE OF ENTRY ' PEDESTRIAN TRAIL ,_d � .- _ � 9*' six r. a I r r •d HAWKER'CRAWFORD-- CHANNEL lia -.•ter ;�jj.�,'+ --- r WOOD RAILS WISTONE r— —RIP-RAP EDGE &CHANNEL PILASTERS ON BRIDGE S U M M I T A V E Primary. Project Entry PEDESTRIAN TRAIL TO-NNECT EXPANDED RIGHT- OFrWAY i' WITH COMMUNITY 7RAIC`SYSTEM TO INCLUDE BIKE TRAIL, THEME LOW RAIL FENCE 1 RIP -RAP' CHANNEL EDGE SUMMIT AVE WALL &BUFFER PLANTING -RANDOM RANDOM TREE PLANTING TO TO SCREEN ;REATE TURF & TURN -OUT RESIDENTIAL UNITS AREAS ALONG TRAIL TURF OR GROUNDCOVER ON BASE OF CHANNEL Section of Hawker Crawford Channel T'Y rrEm. t4, 9,4 RAT PIANNUNG MisM EXHW. SCAU. 4 RESIDENTIAL CUL -DE -SAG BACKS TO EXPANDED PAIiKWAY SHRUB & VINE PLANTING 'A TO SOFTEN WALL PARKWAY OPENS TO CREATE AN EXPANDED SENSE OF SPACE try _ I AC,':T 9M1Id • '6, f �� /� '` ,yq J • .Z/- � w -- CHERRY AVE BROAD VISUAL PENETRATION > TO, AVOID TUNNEL EFFECT Cherry Ave Plan TILE ROOF CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT PROJECT FOR COHESIVE APPEARANCE TURF PRIMARY PLANT.'IG T6 CREATE CLEAN UNIFORM EDGE TO STREET DOUBLE ROW OF PALM TREES TO FIRST INTERSECTION Cherry Street Section Adjacent to Project Entry r. CIS OF rrm: RANUM CUCA MC1I�ITGA. TME MAW PLANNING DWF z a �I Elevation of Primary Entry CUL -DE -SACS OVEN TO TRAIL— PROVIDES r CONNECTION T/J OPEN SPACE I PEDESTRIAN TRAIL RANDOM NE BUFF :, OF SKYLINE. BUFFER a SAN SEVAINE WASH (� aL t RIP -RAP BANK y San Sevaine Wash Edge Treatment CITY 'CF �.. P.`� CL "C)l% A rr - - PiE..AND M r�i :sx v EXHIFd'I •j SCALE: CITY OF RANCHO CucoviONGA ��G�tirpl STAFF REPORT LI; lz U n.ATE: October 9 1985 TO: Chairman/ and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack L46% AICP, Community Development Director BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN - CITY �OF FONTANA Planning Commission review of land use alternatives for the Hunters " Ridge Specific Plan on 580 acres of land within the City of Fontana, located on the north side of Summit Avenue, east of San Sevaine Creek, west of the Devore Freeway, I. ABSTRACT: The City of Fontana is currently preparing a Specific Plan: for the Hunt Club property recently annexed. the consultant selected to prepare the document, the Planning Center, will present three preliminary land use alternatives to the City Council on ^ctober 16, 1985. Prior to this da�.z, the Council -is requesting informal comments from the Planning Commission. Th&�,�Cammission should focus their review of the alternatives on :. -,"cts of the project as they relate to Rancho Cucamonga. II. BACKGROUND: The-City of Rancho Cucamonga has an opportunity to ` comment on the Specific .Plan as provided for in a settlement agreement with Fontana. The agreement resulted from litigation filed by the City upon action by LAFCO removing the ; property from the Rancho, Cucamonga Sphere of Influence and annexing it into the City of °ontana. In summary, the settlement agr.,aement establishes that the gross density of the property will be no more than 4 units per acre. The City of Fontana shall requlvle payment of school impaction 'fees and any other fees' which 'may be identified as necessary mitigation in the EIR or Specific Plan. The two cities agree to cooperate in encouraging a regional park west` of the site in the area of. the San Sevaine Creek. In addition, the agreement specifies- that three land use alternatives be presented to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and their comments will be gfven "serious consideration by the City of Fontana ". III. ISSUES: At the time of the agreement, the City was concerned with the following issues: Unit Count: As shown on Exhibit "A ", the only access to the site is currently through Rancho Cucamonga, so the total number of G dwelling units within the project has a direct affect on,tft s ti f City.' The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Land Use Map originally N ,k ITEM V. , , -Z--, A ... PLANNING COMMISSIONir'- "= REPORT r HUNT,7RS RIDGE SPECIA,, -AN - CITY OF FONTANA C Octo! .'r 9, 1985 Page AM designated the site Very Low Residential (less than 2 du /a(,c") 'aad Hillside Residential. Land Use Transitions: The area within the City of Rancho Cucamonga south of Summit Avenue is designated as Very Low Residential (half- acre lots). Development on the site should provide an appropriate transition. Circulation: Major acces�•to the site is provided by an extension of Cherry Avenue. The i1, :vanda Sperific Plan shows Cherry. Avenue and Summit- Avenue as on-ii two lanes adjacent to the project. Increased density on the site will necessitate expanding the road " widths. Drainage Facilities: Development of tha property will increase runoff and impact downstream properties, unless adequate improvements are planned, Services /Commerical: . Considering the isolated location of the property, adequate schools, parks, water and sewer, and emergency services must be provided. In addition, traffic will pass through Etiwanda traveling to and from commerciai facilities. IV. SITE DESCRIPTION: The 580 acre site is. generally in natural condition with few improvements. Buildings on the site include a club house for the Hunt Club, a stone residence and maintenance' =- sheds. Flood control improvements include a` diversion dike and levee on the west side of the control levee property and. flood crossing the southeast corner of the site. Electrical transmission lines cross through the north- central portion of the site. In addition, a MWD right -of -way traverses the soutM!rn portion of the site. V. LAND USE ALTERNATIVE.,. As mentioned, The Planning Center has:_ developed tree -land use alternatives. The number of units in eact alternative ranges from the low of 1705 up to 2141. Approximately-•, 350 acres of the :site will be '-developed as residential and the three- alternatives show average net densities ranging from 4.6 units per acre to 6.0 waits per acre. Primary access is provided off Summit Avenue by a northerly extension of Cherry Avenue_ A brief description of each alternative follows; ` Alternative One is based on the concept of graduation of density, from the most intense along Summit Avenue (Commercial, W lti- Family) to the least intense at the mouth of San Sevaine Canyon. This alternative calls for 1947 units on 350 acres with an average density,of 5.6 units per acre. Approximately i% of the units are multi- family. Townhouses, apartments, and a {rive acre commercial J r PLANNING COMMISSION ,"�''. REPORT r HUNTERS RIbGE SPECIFi, _AN'- CITY'OF FONTANA =' October 9, 1985 Page g . site are located along"the,north side of Summit Avenue. -Half-acre lots are proposed at, the -. north end of the site. Secondary ;access is provided : j Sammit Avenue and a connection to the east is }Y^ planned. The ,major disadvantage of this alternative relates. `to land use transition and circulation. The townhouses, apartments and commercial zoning at 'the, south' end of the sjAte would be incompatible with half- acre, lots south of tummT Id #� .Avenue. addition, townhouses and 6010 square foot lots are proposed as a transition to the possible regioi41 park along San Sevaine Greek. Regarding circulations the street pattern directs traffic to Rancho Cucamonga with only secondary access to the east. A positive element under this alternative is the attempt to .. incorporate some of the existing mature vegetation' (Peppers, Eucalyptus). s PLANNING COMMISSION; "- REPORT r HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIE - -AN - CITY GF FONTANA l: October 9, 1985 s Page 4 raw tyra*a to sxs c3 O�tEf� SS JL6R X.S JRL J J TNJiiiiMlh tdD iK��lII rRa... ,. .: ' t l as _ i a w 6PCF1 SPKG/ P�s�R „� ✓ ytco � . r G}'U.tffl'CG Cis ° } -v^ ".per � •.� �°^�.`�`:' �'�ef'- �'.�y` � F' '1 :.Nr'e. �.,,�„�'a 9x? Y �! ,M M .�w, ..d PLANNING 'COMMIS 9 RT �`9 * ' HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIFY_ rAN,. CITY OF MNTANA October 9, 1985 ;. ' Page 5 Alternative Two.ciTls for a high intensity core about half way up the site Gommerci'al and :Multi - Family), with densities gradually ` decreasing both to, th'e'north and south. This alternative is also the most' intense�of the ,'. three; it pvoposes 2141 units on 354 ",acres of hand with any ,average density -of 6 units per net acre. Approximately, 35% of *he units are multi- family and another 44% are single family 'on 4500k °square rootw tots. Single family homes on 7200 square foot lots are`loca'ted on the``nerth side of Summit and along` the extension of Cherry Avenue. Half - ,'cre lots', are located in San Sevaine Canyon... 5ecoadary- future access is shown to the f east. "4W The proposed density of this alternative would create the greatest impact on Rancho Cuca,aonga. The vast :majority of units are either multi- family or, single'i' ily,on 4500 square foot lots. Also, it does not appear that` the proposed intensity considers the slope of the land and graving impacts: As the .Commission is av�re, side aT .z rear yard slopes significantly "reduce bui•ldin�, pads and yard areasf_. 9� pyrticularly on,, small lot "subdivisions. Given these factors,. ' , massive grading and the use of retaining walls-,will be necessary to ?aJ y' .maintain the unit count.:. c.. r 3 t Y { y PLANNING COMMISSION r"" REPORT HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIE — __AN - CITY OF FONTANA October 9, 1985 Page 6 LrLLlt ' M TNT Gas r�vi set ■ . 7t.Til7�it lLS .rtG 1?0 T.'O 8 1. i(Y47f+t6 Af fII 4F JF? efacat�rz Fn Ff tP1 Mr 71WNWC4 KO 4p, (!d SRf . iissT+T'C/+th fW 1al. �IN �4t T=—,r V,: s s NH ft\ i \�Kro I cwt i SItW PLANNING COMMI ,REPORT HUNTERS RIDGE SPEC+E�- „AN -CITY OF FONTANA October 9, 1985k. Page 7 ! 17 Alternative Three _has the lowest density with 1705 units on, acres. Thy” h erage� d,'ensity of residential property is 4:tZ dwebll,ing units per /net acr�p. Half- acre . lots are shown on the north side -of Summit and Qpng the lextension of Cherry. Apartment uhits at 20 dwelling's per - acre are proposed-At the mouth of Sam Sevaa ne Canyon. No commercial use is provided. Primary access fron the east Is planned. ' This alternative calls for a lower unit court, half - acreio( "s 'alongt the south projec�l6dundary,, and larger single famib lot along San ,Sevaine Creek;' and primary circulation to the :east: ,� The area of concPrd :is•,t4e apartments in Sin Sevaine Cahyon.: Though of limited effect on Rancho Cucamonga, the iproposed net density of 20 units per acre Wilt have a,-,sevare, ;impact on the character of the area and will require substantial alteration of existing, l,and forms. 4, s` J �K „`�ec_;U7 ^` PLANNING COMfN'ESS ON R n U ` HUNTERS RIdd SPECIh 'CITY OF FONTANA- : October 9- , 1985 Page 9 � T VI. SUMMARY. No 'one�'alternative seems to 1 provide the optimum scenario, with respect to 1m�acts"on Rancho Cucamonga. However, Alternative Three' appears to,\ be the. most acceptable ` in terms of jts, relat onship;'''to K'a��cho Cucamonga, in that it incorporates s�:vii -al x " characteristics 7mpc;�tant to the City, as outlined below.' 1. Total unit count is somewhat lower ( ±1700—A Is) reflecting � _ more sers'itiv fly to 5rte constraints and surrounding land uses; 2. A circulatiom system whicit depends heavily ion. access. to :Duncan Canyon (to the ast), rather than emphasizing Summit and Cherry Avenues; € 3. ,Half -acre "estate'!, lots t�djacent to Summit Avenue -and other areas designated for less'i`:han 2 du /ac in-'the Rancho Cucamonga, General Plan; 4. Lack oflcommerical or other intensive use f activ -'ies; and 5. A mix of dwejling types (singi� family v5G multi - family) more r in tune with e:'istin, and'planned devel 'opment in the area. i In addition, the final coneei�t selected should facilitate the a fol .owing: „ 1. Preservation and sensitivity to existing natural featui, s aria A, land fot ^ms, particularly in regaC to mature vegetation and grading,. 2. Sensitivity, to naturdl hazards such as slop? stability, 4 flooding and seismic conditions;: 4 3. Integration of San Sevaine .Creek into the design of the project thrr%+igh appropri -ite orientation,alld land use transitions; and 4. Regional. trail ,;connect ons as ouilined it iae City's General , �r Plan and Nest Valley Fepthills Plarr ' V1 I= RECOMMENDATION: The PlanningfCommis's•:on should review the proposed alternatives as they relate, to' the City of Rancho •,Cucamonga, ?LFti Comments should be referred` 6 ^the c ity Council by minute actigion far their review on October 16;P985.� "• fit. J/ t � � j t _ ` �y9 � �� y� _. • 1 +5 �� 1 uw t , `.. z � l �t V•J , a ,•� 1,61 -�- ti a '1 d t`�' �- fn�,r�`��t•I '!�`•i ?v�•��`V �� \ �J• t �� 1�/)\�5� i � r� _ t .} I �`'•t'J r. 1� °(n` `. t:`- 1Jli / Ir � 11h\l �� ~ � '9�� ,�•".: L jlftt -�L' v� IV>` .l;'1 c, -'['��' 11 }.i+. .o'er «��,,., -..�, f� �(.�✓ ��� _ . c �L:coO Y ",¢... ,n`� �.� r �' ' l() Jr �� JV!' (.�•' „' \. f. 1r`s-�- I/ o l . ,, ; `.,•,,, .. ti n � I{,5 . �y I, \v,c� � t � L.:,u /1 %�(� i/ c 11; f���.1,V�� � ♦�1_� s`t``� 2� J` It J��� r�tl �� \ 1ii1 \- `�! }�ivf••. f `.J' ,�,� a_,1 ^S. ini,�V't „ : ` �F- ;,,rrr�,% SAN GABRIEL M. TS fib -JJ Ja l:if• •� n • � r ROVED .. � li �' ✓'Zr• �t 1= v �:c`4 -t��i� ' ,1�1 �"_2+ 1 1�•; ��".. ,: "�_ Y ✓/ :+ a a_.. � r 3 y DRAINAGE COURSE :e3e s . ........... 'O VEE No �_ a � T LS ROL t4�'et Y t� r �. p�LY� +' I ! �.90,11rw1 •` .°I 'e uMlt( •,�Q �/ • \ -�i�l� _..0 � `I 127 )] Gwa c' •i 5 4 e' NORTH CITY OF I7 FrVI: ct �i �'. RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: (s',. -,acac Vim: ,r PLAN1P -MN,1G DIVLSIM EXHIBIT, SCALE: ' q V. HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN - CITY OF FONTANA - Planning Commission review of land use alternatives for the Hunter's Ridge Specific Plan on 580 acres - of land 'within the City of Fontana, '1,ocated north of Summit Avenue, east of San Sevaine Creek. west of the Devore freeway. Curt Johnston, Associate Planner,; reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Chitiea stated that she was concerned with the overall density: of the project,, and particularly with -transition - of density. She stated that Alternatives 1 and 2 should not even be considered; possibly something mare along the lines of Alternative 3 in terms of circulation and transition of density. She was also concerned with the large number of small single family homes. She su99ested ::_that preservation and sensitivity to 'histor structures should be considered and that fire and wind hazard should also e addressed, along with the feasibility of requiring fire sprinklers. ,Commissioner Rempel stated that he shared these concerns &hd war, also concerned d th access. He advised that the locaton of streets acing west needs. to be delineated and' was concerned that street connect-co' ns were not shown on the map. He was also concerned that "this may be the last review the Planning Commission will be afforded and was unhappy with me seeing something in the finer detailed stages. a. Mr. Johnston advised that the West Valle, Foothills Pian'1 show a majors east /west corridor north of Summit; however, the idea was iiiat San Sev4 ne Aft Creek would be a logical b6ndary between the two cities and .Once a res'onal park is planned for that location it was thought that there' would not-. be a street connection there. f Commissioner Barker didn't like the idea of taking all the traffic through Rancho Cucamonga's streets. He advised that the impact on traffic is going to be Considerable especially with this increase -in density. Further, that the issues recognized by staff in the report capsulizes the concerns of the Commission, in their; review of any other project with regard to transition of density, seismic, and compatibility. He stated that the list given by staff is a star'^ing point along with the criteria used in the Commission's approval of the projects to the west and 'adjacent area. He stated that this project must be compatible and should - refect the same kinds of standards, sizes, and ?1 other criteria used by Rancho Cucamonga to the 'full extent possible. ' He considered all three alternatives unacceptable. Commissioner Chitiea questioned why ll three alternatives p,e _Y twes show op,n space and parks,in. the same location.' "r•.. 4ohnston replied that approximately 2/3 of the park land s going to be located within utility corridors. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by. Barker, that all three alternatives presented were unacceptable. Staff to prepare comments to `the applicant. Motion carried by the following „vote: Planning Commission Minutes -16- October 9,, j AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BARKER, REMPEL NOES:- COMMISSIONERS: NONE ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, STOUT - carried N DIRECTOR'S REPORTS W. HIGHLAND AVENUE WALLS AND LANDSCAPE:'nESIGN - 4ILLIAM LYON COMPANY - Ural Report Dam Coleman, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report'. He requested that the Commission direct staff as to whether a test 'section of the wall should ° be constructed or if they felt comfortable enough to allow the applicant to construct the entire wall. Commissioner Rempel stated that the proposed design would make an attractive wall and would have no.probiem with constructing the entire wall. Commissioner Chitiea agreed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Chitiea, to approve the Highland Avenue walls and Landscape Design as presented. Motion carried by the following t AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, CHITIEA, BARKER _ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, STO•sT - carried X. TERRA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DESIGN - WOLFF, LANG CHRISTOPHER - Oral Report Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, reviewed t;`e staff repast. Mr. Coleman asked the Commission to consider th x''option of ct, tinuing this item for review by the full Commission. .t Commissioner Rempel stated that it is not k.nwn what the time line is that has been established by the School District. Vice- Chairman Barker was concerned with the aesthetic appearance of the ` structures and that the fact that they would be there for a tremendous amount of time until 'the state finds some way of funding school buiTdangs. = Planning Commission' Minutes -17- October 9;:;198 t :99 f e tt W. f r.'s lu;, �. c , '•� Y f 1� r f F ' ` 19�rp Ebr 6 'g N "Gdi1�MT3 TV n 3 sk p g kM F1 V m "Na 1L $oIlsi;s x,; " �. ommi§s�one era*` Corati'm�ssr "oneRfe�zie Qomissiane .itte�a:--"`-- GgrrimtstnanerSoukl � . MI Adfib icementSrF A RI 1. v e danusryF'2;;2��l986�J `'� � ) The ftpfti tng, waseaa8, �:' iiendar�.itEms: qie expectedr to,'I a routine and non. canft' ItakL Whey witi be acte 3. orr a�Z, he Corr2MIS A, at. one time wit aoL�t ssaon. Cf`anyon&has concern O'etn nyritem,, itshouitt ussion. A TIME EXT'ENSIOM FOk, TEWATIY"E TTRACT 12612; ,JEWSEX A custom, lot -resident subdiuisi`on o 2T :lbts on`.18 9 acres of land. in the Vt. , "(Very Lour Residentiaf)i bistc 'et, located on the south side of Summit Avenue, egst of Biiwan�a Avenue - APN 225481-02 ¢c 03. VL Public Hearings: (� The following items are public hearings in which concerned Individuals may voice their opinion of the. related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman ond,,.address the, Commission by stating your name and address. tLL'�suc opinfona, shall be [[!�� limited to 5 minutes per individi ~al for each pAoject: k pp a S 1A7 S A F r .+ -ait ^i a a7 � x> 4 4U© �I�iSSE�S.'1��E..�,+t,�iiii .�PA'RGEL�yi % 9�18A.- ,fii r HNN >T}s@O�FF111`i1NlGIIaZ1 RnAIw 'AS on o'64�7 g are o wind. into 3 aSC e�ne n kRraill r�Se a Lriet r� 2 0 �atr� sout4r�f 9� bst ee ndr . " ° ewes`iv��13' 2'4 rCGon True rom § ^ C. a,_.NYIRU _lIt9EN1AL�`` 4ESSlYTE4NZe�i1NDw2�T7i1aTR�C�a1 ?F 1rI 420IR� lR3:(�IiOf°PIA�RKViIL"II'AS T itelopmen f§ srnglefarc►lttache ae es o n rn t Zotni �f r esi ern i �� st ic8 c` oea tfie nor ner� 6f°hr °Steetsa�r nten e yAPN 209 6 04 0 an + D. EN1Fio?Mk�2l aiA+ LSE►SSESSMENfC�AND.ON�iA�IiACI" .. �` i 3�10i3s L17BE "RSISeO;I!T- ?Ii0NIES "NiO�It RE ' GIT G"E A P� resfd�ntr' eve opm�nt?�Cocesist, gif� condom;; iim�u J. J ory fl `3aeredolandin hetIedritmr igh�Re�^identi*t it c dulac) loc`"od"thei 3p'sid oirr�owaxut, adjecent to the easy arde of Deer GreeC'ChannelPN 208 31+1µ,]a3 ,r E ENI t MW , NTAT� ASSESSIVIEN,T A`NA {PARCEZ M:�P 9349E SMITEI A drvrsron =of 1 3' acrel 2 pai cei in t, °° Vety s:ow Resrdentiali Dastrret 'C7. -2 du/ac) iodated: on the sou "th side `.of. Strang Lane, west of Carnelign Avenue - APN 10 61- 27107. VIL New Business F. ' : NVIAONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVEI OPIIENT REVIEW 85 -44 -.TALK - A proposal to develop a 9,120 "seruard foot industrial building on 1.02 •acres of land 'along thi. southeast corner of 6th Street and Lucas Ranch. Road xr, Subarea 5 (General Industrial/Rail Served) APN 21li -32 -05 �k 06. G. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 12G30 =' CITATION - Design Review for Tract 12830, a resid.%Tlal subdIVISJOHof 21,41 acres in the Low Medium`Residential District C4 -8 du /ac; into 103 lots located on the west side of Beryl Street, north of Base Line Road. H. CQNDTIIQ�%A1, USE .PERMIT 85 -26 - WILLIAIYI l YON -= Consideration of, the perimoter wall treatrhent- o a recreational vehicle ,storage /mini warehouse facility, �appe'Q of the deca-ion of Design Review Committee. 5` t ��* , :?� un ' 3 cifi k� o � :a���9�,� ,.�� an t •. Fed - µ�.x° 5 tya on cv Phis "ats i'e ti,�e�+and�, iac fo* ta; a eraZ its to.alc�"tregs "Che oa t' dy peo 's "a9 t,4v �: t % « Acy}anmenY ' i qr The Plan ngrComr�eisstort hasadbedmtnti?e RguTaio that sef an�Y2 prm ad ozrinet t�me�i ;f,�tertts�goa �eyondii�uZ t rr�P! the shai'Z tie izea�zt�a�y with he eoiisent o�sY%e Ico�rtm � �+ru_ ' <' . I p � 1 p sK t; *fn IN&I e '4p v � B ,y t 4; �COELE00 B ■ t I ` B+ArBA �rW. Btu e! •nR "" • 5• ' � 1 ,.A � �+ .st ` 3�Feemwr... 3 y, .Ts 95Z %= r 24 i4: '�'1a9S9@■@ ICBI �' • ^- 19 en •� � k � �`� �` t �� ��� a vkY � �`,�� '4� ,. 'v;? ■ Anar - • ■ ' t � B s B pP, - • 1 g 'CUCAMOHOA- OUASTI COUNTY REOf ;t, �AAIIR. l4 ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT' p# ri Aj 1, izjeh$ ant' ~ ; ! DATE: February 8,, 19116 TO: Chairmq* and, MTbers of the Planning .Ogmnss`ion FROM: Brad Buller, Cityi,PTanner ; t a, BY: John, R'o' Meyer, Assistant Pl,pner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENS1Oh F F TRACT <72462t1ENSEN° `- A custom 6t res ent a etaif�in o f obi 0"49 acres of nand �n .he VL dgtrict _ local edon the south;.`s$lde til' of Summa,, 'e,ast o` EtiWande ;Avenue,, tirAiti:ri` the Etiwanda Specific Plan,;,- APN 225 - 181 -02' 03:` I. BACKGROUND: Associated Engineers* renresenti,ng Mr. Jepsen., the 3I owner of entative Tract 12462, ar:guestin two year e extension for the I above described .tr &et. Tract" 12462, has originally approved'6ecember 14, 1983. In. Novemhe'r,of 1984, a . moratorium was established id t4_, tiwandal e area for the development of drainage master ;plan .and development palic;y. That moratorium was lifted; on May 20', 1985, by the City Counoii. ' Tentative Tract 12452 Was then automatically extended .!to April 26, 1936. The tract was approved as a custom lot subdivisi6n i wherein individual lots could be sold for development..' II. ANALYSIS: Staff has, analyzed the proposed, tim(a extension with the development criteria outlined in the City's Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Plan. Based upon this review, the project meets the basic development standards for the fiery Low Residential District. The maximum time period for 'tentative maps is 5 years. Therefore, the Planning Commission cou j! grant up to a 36 month extension to April 26, 1989. l ITEM A X4 V ,� CON3SJLTlNOGIkItEN.1N6E $r: 3 # 3AbryEAtE „S ® GNTARIO_Ci�UFO�lJI�1917*84 • (714j98158 98 {,', *q MA NC; Ah NTApIO, C 9' 76t r Jill Mr. Brad Buller, Planning Director�i ` City of Rancho Cucamonga ” P.O. Box 807 ` Rancho Cucamonga, M, .91730 Subject, Request for Extension o£ Tentative Map "Approval, for ��rcii 4k`' Tract No., j262 , Reference: Rick Gomez Ldttoii to Boll, Jensen, Dated May 21„ 1.985 ' (Attached) e' Dear Mr. Buller: - While construction drawsngs for. tk a pciYt&on Hof thh Etiwanda Drainage , Elan to serve wTz the area ixch `includes Trac£ .12462e 'iea4 ng comple�tior., agreements for funding thecae storat day n imQrovpemrnts are; still, ± rld r discussi:on. These discussions between theyCtyx aril several +lancicthzers and developers are continuxnsl, tilhila we iPYieve ogress xs being made, until an agreement is reacherTr` Mrlf Jettsen cannot scold 4ths tt lat. ' Therefore -a two year extension of the approval of the' Tentative Map for Tract No. 12464 is requested, on behalf of Bob Jensen, Inc, in x accordance with the referenced letter. The required $62 fee is enclosed. very truly yours. L � o Robert E. Mills REM /kf Enc. cc: Bob Jensen Lloyd Hubbs TO T7 "983 52 PLANNING DESIGNING ,� SURVEYING A 3 I r CITRUS c I IWfL {IT1LY ®q�rd UFor6. HatsS ILLSt CITfUi OIIOYS �� ��i\ CITRUS Om On \i±� OIIOYC m r// tip .. T HOUfC NOUst �x I �L. c /AY 7 /p[81 tMTIAL "Wu Hour NW39 ... .. -... i' fiIYNIT RYLML(?; j r_ fue�CCT rxavLiTr �, I UfL NOUSS VAC Y YACANT. iJ � NLSTA {NV.YS $. 4.9 11 HWfL iR0117L 9XISTINO CITRUS oebNC'. 11101'0 9YC -FAMILY Rlf10LN. 3 Ni SI �/K ` /IIOlOfCO S /NOIt - lANILT RCf IOLN7IAL rACAN7 VACANT arc• IA VACANT VACANT HlasaIL /) �r II NOOK R -1 -.20 / AVIARY HOURS F�F 1 CITY ©F ITI= RAl'LM CUCAMONGA TME, PLANNING DIVISSM EXHIBIT; SCALE: rmw"19 E 1 Ml QW ARWAMAAX-�� ITEM: ExHii3rr: .,,,..�....,- t`?'y^TTaa+. is RESOLUTION NO. 83 -140 c p 7 A RESOLUTION' OF `CAE. 11 ,ANNING COMMISS3.ON OF lliE` CL'Y i w - RANCHO CO MONGA SUIFORNIA,. CONDITIONALLY PFROV•ING TENTATIVE TRACT 'F'P Nt1.., 1462 ( WHEREAS, Tentative fract:•,Map No. 12`462, hereinafter ;submitted by Jerjen Builders, Ine , app14,can , for the purpose of subdividing,',thQ� real proper y situated in the f:ityrl,xf'.R- rho Cucamonga,, County of San 9ern "ard�rio; State of California, described as a »'custom lot restdenti,al sub,0 I i,nn,`inter 27 lots, regularly came before the - Planning Corm ssion. for.: publitc hearing -and n action on Decemberl'].O, 1483 and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all condit;ons set :forth in the Engineering and Planning Ajvisi i s reports; and r; WHEREAS, the Planning ,r' repo h� read and consideredi,the Engi :ring and Planning Dfivision's reports and has considered other evidence pre -ated at the :public hearing. E� NOW, THEREFORE,; the Planning Commission of the City` �canchG '` Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the, followinfl, findings, in 31, regard to Tentat ve Tract No. 12462 and the Map thereof;' r (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and"5pe'cific plans, (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (c) The site is 'physically suitable for the type of k development proposed; ( (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to ca�.se substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative t* -act is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired' by the public at large, now of ,record, for access through or use of ;x�e property within the proposed subdivision. (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued, c: 'Y ✓ i RETry{ S1 ^G+^ Y.^ T ^x n m 17M- 1'4'7.^5}IF.'+t �'i `5"N J Page': >. . `g p� }w� §S SECTION 2 Tentat� e� Tract Map r4o•., 12462., 4, colay� e� ch attached hereto, of �s ereby�approuea t- ubject to, 41i tte fpllgping coed and the attached Stiha4^d.`Gond,;� PLANNING. D.IFISION: The e- xut1,4ng w��ndroyt` located uonti�guousr two 5urrcii�ta x Avenue ail: bye "sewue�d:� ATI st'te�nors�' ` °" Is, ire .; shall be presser on A, ar h"eORt z' e . �►�t�', Eue ,j a �s I Macu'l,aay inda Specy`fic Planadai�ds;.' 2. Future. access shgUr .be gained Ja, to al A�eaues ;A. or 8;, . Accdss shal be restricted along iSuimiiitm'4lvenue. a 'i 3. Future dr *y,6 ays ° olcatedr, on Sumni7tx Avenue shall be. � egaipped With,' a nohs7ip texirurized ; treatment- designed td, ac'a date egoeatr'i?an,,:travel: ' : Ali `ate 1'I 4, This prole�t shall; comphly- With appl4eable standards and regulations related to the _ktiwarida ' Specific � ` qn'. . r 41 ENGINEERING DIVISION 5. Storm drain overflow structure shall be constructed— to the satisfaction of the City Engineer from Court -----� "CO", to Avenue JAB'". APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1983. PLAN N6POMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: P f Dennis Stou hairman ATTEST: - Acti g rotary o t e inn n{ n Commission' �. x+_f i 11!10. �lqlrg r .t rJ sm 1j 1 L, RLCK, G(IMEZ, cti g ea - etarry of the p't ann C�fs�iyn':a RaBchQ Cu ama sgee, d e Y tif- tat ore; na ` eso� t on�was�' ]y ai?d reg!�larty �►a Qe ; Pa �" nd° °a apte telP n� °� ova tie' t City aftac Cu von thg, 14�th� ay x e errs zrbthefa"1- 1owP9wot�o�i;;� AWES.,. CINrMi +0 ..RS' �tP14EL, BARER; STOtiI NOES; �ERS': }, ABSENT: COMMS�UNE is' : 40 R, h1CFlLEI �-w Al a Eli 3 6. Z-6 YOC 5 a; it n .5T i YOB bc 6t cS'Y .4', At az .Es Z—z �_Ze Eta .27 I-M t­m a Za. 3► 5 & V v 2 Mt 29- :6e " I- = = i -,l; . -.::N : = E, 'I Iz Z a T"Z :Sa 9 IR V m pf, 4- ;.S _T ri &2:5 21, z -.82 av Z t =5 =.S .9.9 1 d u L o. tw SAY °Obf:YWR +Oa. d Yno b IL R' , - C; L µ n �b cw� ua a` ^iiYE " ,..8o "`4aa alY ra.11 7F.a dg tL gdt U `��Ew �4r'r U >V� RNyi O $a i y G� �c ^6 o.G Cn A' QyU,rpR �C4 � =q N4 a V ri Z`9LY f v b �� R � Q�� L Yy� DDq Q .Y.�Y�YbN� RAV � aN G` aG <. -.5Y. hiL Q$ E O4 Ii oa +aim vhu0 3 n • L� U p G N N 4.Lr,Ya �'y y 4 .00C �KL LO OL ��a ad O�Y v,.x 4Y 6p�n aV-2 3 0 0.1 j 2 IVY OUfj e ua CCnQ UO ° V 0.4 M.0 NA YCg$L 66 Z qil,_ q `D.yLOO vM 1�� Yom. Nw°VO �t X gq —^ O C=GµT YGw RaY yy t C +.Q�ON gy`Gr.� � Ny `iL iG Ya'O uV..�Q MNV i^ u� a��a 96y. O Vyy; ♦ p4 �`O Ay. "ciaw ii.bggpqs.6 10 ay ccO ]3R CO wN U. a m 'antic O 4�- @r yyaCy xq O OC �=ggµD nq�V �'U.'�Z QOn . haµµ VOOpp C CU' W�+ }�Y µ Y M LV M µ.CO aAl! y U « Q Y n 0.1 j yS. "�qC CCnQ UO ° V 0.4 M.0 NA YCg$L 66 Z qil,_ q `D.yLOO vM 1�� Yom. Nw°VO Y t4.�P6 O C=GµT YGw RaY yy t C +.Q�ON gy`Gr.� � Ny `iL iG Ya'O uV..�Q q M.r. Z~u p4 r ru°`ua A °Yq -Cr C;J 10 1 .2 �tj �0 LOV k. µw aYa! O A ' �■ O L w @r yyaCy xq O OC �=ggµD nq�V �'U.'�Z QOn . haµµ VOOpp C CU' W�+ }�Y µ Y M LV M µ.CO U « Q Y �b0 USG GVbr °p QUG C LpON G ^CC9 '';:5 a YS E'ce, qvR �w Y. 6a�c Q sicE. °^ 7 ny,G = dff u,a,+ o•o c^yey ° c G.pa h� oa"` a 404Y'� DCU q �C`7 L eat LQy e ?�b V.46 nGi iu a 6 D . h�4Y�.1 O�YL C.Q V V 4q Ua YUU yµ ar u .a+� 1 Ri. =t 1 � X4 L +�L 27 �r N'(i CG +C DV w Lam+ 5, tG.0 DUµ O� d -Q 0.1 j YL O V ^ t�A a d w t c ^ L i 5 9 v V, CW a Z 2-.2- V PO = AL O L N.LV+ d ,LL L O�?L •. Vj U °I.t OqD 0m 29P d O V `•. -m a �N..a o Tv L N� d � y N9'� n 6 m° ;I B. ,� t C A EY. L A y 0= C �L64 W. Y:Yr1� BOO - N Nd ttoa OI Vo A y« L N �^ LPL^ G3 V „4 x.0.4 Ns ° ° >osv�. �.oiy: G° om o NN •. �.��`oa �� !? ro a'6..w'°i. 4V � °�> L�1YG� -° LVQe r.•on •L.jSM �yS• P J.i� S.- $ T$27- vap C c m SO Pa von ° L a� rTO O G� ` G G N"QL E O W Ol+ ^> N VT V `Y'V -CC v Vw,GC -V6u t�N It 4L2 I�aa YSLi A "A°l- .222 dU M �J• �� qP O na c ewoW l..•'. `o n.:'.L.A �oaY.. co a aurn >a. EA N 01Y a w-..a 9.y W G y V p N Vt0'NV O Y JL °'� T 247 0. �� M P Nq. CLTO 9r.N aCN LO Y: wCpy pp t 'N -g- N. 9 NLx y0 YV O.L t • n twV ~A V +E-= E Y T �. L V w 6 G r i ..• N^ O N to s u S a O i y t V t V ul V ' Uh N G Of � C c d V g N O C C V , C gV S•� L aO v A V V• -• -q + �y10 .a� '� v o o '• a N��OG Z X - ° H q oy a X^ O N� G « u� ° G yvOO o- co A cNroi 7Y�ETJ�Y off 6. dog nN V G CC CL L V 6s = M. t' vim• OIL ^�V dN Eta °O•P • N E it 1 T Y � V O` < O L d° XCG _ p t` n: .E.. a V U N N E U a C -� Q 69 0��u- QN6o ZZ-A N-Ngv� 6N� 4iUi 4N 3NLV \< C d°cs 2 55- A I 0 aAYgy SaOtp -r Od W-rt �� aY � VO .NL N zi �� .Q '° c °i$ v ,,°, °1 °S off. ` °. ► ° a � �. a''R. '` ° A o '° �.' LAO a � .. N n d ^ Ol Q. V G q� .Q "• -, C1. a =. V.- 9-0-a - Qq d�N .a-. pd4•ld �N. Er.C. .�T � 4�.° � L d'Jy ' YY vvano. p .� p V C'OC Jil .C' L N T _ 6d Na .Zil Y r6 p��!. M yEEEGGG OC.F M s` VO. NL t� .n dr. mac. gYy1 NVC..� pN.y1 F � qg A dad V U.O R` \C N vC_ pIC as N` Yp.S -'se gGgy U N 6eY y �L Oa ��1�43G a ITG U L CN.. A TJ NU a Q d T 4. O y T Y 4 Y V Y CI Ol d t ° x `d1 L v >�rn LA cc. cV �E ^q ° rycn� 9 N d LN..U.6C d a ^ � r_iW LN r •y QY O I per^ � N¢d dC 9�� �O� OFge y Fr 'A U C0. O 5 -Z Is � CL.^NL �Ot ¢aY.N UC: WNa t-t M1 �. �) Q� W H' N� .. I.I� O� �� ♦ RI 1 6 IQeva d ca w a y l N b RX 41 j J O1 a L-+s Cg N 6 N HI, BB.. d w.. C 8.. • yl O a N 4 q. Y L QN �VO yCQ� pip A G G G6�. °dV LL Y q- d H OO U1L �L y w+OL � C C A V dLCI r� O T O LTCCO L 3QgCL �dC UMW .GTO 1 Cq =1 UaY 00� O sMina °' ofi icuw ;I is e V VSO: Lp. O d L v 3 A q �6ry L Z P A u..QW C'l �» Y L N N w p q L rt n V yY. � a+yyN q V NSr i.C. r'^ O �;aTO ar+d0,. �r.a E KMAn. ..y`. V... � EpWw aTN� V �6T"'t y L .G rt n'� ..L+i � i4• 1 C.n M a4cy qy^ °wnao R u,: °`+°• °�c ,TO � O =a. ¢Ly1VNC 2aG rQ�CG C �2! :y ~! N � C4N W m a74 Ott C `D Y�q� on°. ,ec. C LH Vw CO u EJO� V U v L nE b w �. L V• R y aly Vlr d 6r A OW ♦n q C p C G r6V� wL V alwM^ k n W au n T T. N c„u� E C c Ci W �. B RR O L C. n C� a1F N 'OU �. 2L = L aa�i is aR .mac` WPM^ < � COI N.V `OTOOMn 4NG 01 C.0 � p .t ` DA G �dEEV>ti p�yA �^ rr CD Cd. 5u WOV qlF RIn 1l V � Y=w 10O,,019 qO W q�.4 G�34.. ILa "a -n' z1a. d O4 CW. U Y� S yn _ cG�++ 6.w 4V Cp O � dy c 4 CF qqCC ateq. q OQ C y4 �� ° 4adruam �zx •n °-ryowi wla w = °s .mayy+. [`a C1� �- Old gg�.y4Z mOR� � H.E.. Wt�J � N•i+lr.� �O 3b �m LC p 01 dt �i CTir MP V6 �yG. qF y�R` V�� 000y1N uq.. .Cyyg µ3 O 01 .: •'A. �Y rH u..- �t�'J ', F`^ �L IA Cu4f4G Kiln 6.< A.'aF Yt4 y YRR.w t! �L Vim^ �� ;I is e V VSO: Lp. O d L v 3 A q �6ry L Z P A u..QW C'l �» Y L N N w p q L rt n V yY. � a+yyN q V NSr i.C. r'^ O �;aTO ar+d0,. �r.a E KMAn. ..y`. V... � EpWw aTN� V �6T"'t y L .G rt n'� ..L+i � i4• 1 C.n M a4cy qy^ °wnao R u,: °`+°• °�c ,TO � O =a. ¢Ly1VNC 2aG rQ�CG ato4��O'm 1R �.� 4a ao ee C' GNp nOC Tl` , OF AV`0.0...4aarT NU`i o..•G.� t SWQ CO e C. cc q qr�n C G r6V� wL V IY uac� a'w.�.YGq Ems, 40. ^ 6N • B RR L- L C. n C� a1F N 'OU �. d1, A q � rt aa�i is aR .mac` IIalP q�rc < � COI N.V `OTOOMn 4NG 01 C.0 � p .t ` DA G �dEEV>ti p�yA �^ rr CD Cd. �JaM WOV qlF RIn 1l V � Y=w 10O,,019 qO W q�.4 G�34.. ILa "a -n' z1a. d O4 CW. U Y� S yn R N 91 LA q OQ *N v q �.O .I�Y.� G.GN 6N �9 WI Y•r.. �Y I KM O.H� 6� A -E� a tD naa� y Svu %` yG Ar yes n� Y N 9 a Y w 2 u Lmr. � T y YE M� `�,•,.L N N 019 <.N '�.A U gMnN'"'•4t X dGL G y�u� �y „.Lp >O 9 ^ y n C 6•r p a M' T d q _ � p NO �N �= ti T x p w4 6e. A. O LW CN��r � K• O• � DLO4 .O � SOO �� L .D oCr A CV L9' y N a E O q6L O n p�00 XL O`a 5 Q U D Uq,pOV L t p �a L Y L Y nU L� �uN q Nu C Of A� V p Y,r O x O .�. =60 LgL�7C�yn'N YL� pq Eu CC `9'� Cy OOd� cc 0.19 ' T.��� L � 7 iY.�6. 'p9N Tam EL,�Ly aq LyoL ^L 7•n <G u 4 CO T y d C u C C- E.2 T y KOU n U vnW m \an'o.ou a+¢u cR- y.n�LUn u °-v A- -l4 w, o � yN a � y N p p D G G A � `• (. 2 d C q N N '- d'�.°. yd 9 9 - -. ^V LAC VL q L YA y yaya F L L y qC � i a A Y Y YF Y A p T i. � R C Y Y r TY M MM Yl i rGa � �'L^ q9 f oW EN G f O AV ^' a 0 +J v v U N < i EOd C � ZZ E N d °uu eI a ou 'O AV ^' \ RESOLUTI)� NO. y '' ✓� i A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING.CO MISSTON APOAMR`TNh, THE TIME',- XTENSI'ON FOR TEUTATITUE TRA&T: T12462 WHEREAS, k request has been filed for a time extension for the '.' above- described project, pursuant to Section 16.014,070 WHEREAT, the Planning - Comnission \conditionally approved the v, above- describedPTract. SECTI6 l,r The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made! the following f—ngs,. i n�c f f ' J, A. That pr vail,in- economic conditions have caused a disir,-ss0,- .,,market ciimate for 'development- of the project." B. That current economic, marketing, and -' inventory `conditions •make it, unreasonable to develop the projtti -at this time. . C. That strict enforcement of tie conditions of approval regarding expirations would , not be consistent with the intent of the development Code. 0. That the granting, Tof said'time.extension will not be detrimental tothe public heailth, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2:, The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extens o� n for: Pro Sect Applicant Exliration ' TT 12462_ Jensen Aprii 26, 1989 ' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH U.:Y OF FEBRUAP3, 1986. _ - ' PLANNsNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO,GUCAMONGA I l BY: L. Stout, airman RTrEST: Brad u er, gouty Secretary r� t . x 4, 6� c 'j �" �","': y � • "�wss �, �* n�,. r ." �-y ". � y �� u `" � T4 tdAM.,1e riot , - . ensen ` .� ^e' I, b`r�3d' 3ut1e L Oe uty Sei tar, of the '��ann�ng Commissnan "off the ;0 � t oaf ` Rancht►�Cucartsonga, d hereh �d jY 5 ► ten faregong Neso{ utioh asiiyd - i re ommis ig. q a asses n adapt y he iassn g� star ,¢s .my of` W -fi �Cne�ma 3;��at,� ran �a �+mm ifg, of � the Pole {s�ior� ���e1�_ , an 4 +he 25th dayrflf ebraBG, dyne *fallowing Votr�a w,fi _ AYES, 40M S ON NER- l NOES: tb* i.SSTONER*Si k ABSENT; COMMPSSTONRS': fr 1 jj rr o 4 C;ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G��Mp STAFF REPORT ��o W . DATE: February Z9, IS% ten TO: Planning Commission r FROM: Barrye R..Hansgn,.Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Kra11,,,Ast1stant.Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSEaSSMENT AND PARCEL MAPS- „9180 - IANDGO .;:TNNCIAL j QR ORATI,OTi A' w�rsi'on 'of 5 acres of . land into . parce s in t e GeNeral In.” ustrial >lRai1 served' District, Subarea .; )ncai�ed south of hinth,;Street and west ,of He°1man- Avenue - APN 209 013 -2 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uestee '�,ApproAl of Parcel Map U B. Purpose : To divide 5.47 L acres into 3 parcels for future industr`al f( eve elopment K C. Location: 500 feet south of Ninth Street on the west side of Hellman Av,-nue D. Parcel Size: Parcel I 1,98 acres Parcel 2 - 1.90 acres Parcel 3 - 1.90 acres T-otal 5.78 net acres t , E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial /Rail Served F. Existing Laid Ilse: Vacant r-- G, Surroundi � Land Use: Nort xisting ndustrial South - Vacant East - Existing Industrial West - Vacant N. Surroundin General Plan and Develoament Code Desi nations: North - General Industrial/Rail Serve Subarea -2 South General. Industrial /Rail Served Subarea Z East - General Industrial Subarea 3 West General Industrial /Rail Served - Subarea 2 IRV ITEM B I� PLANNING GOMMTSIt2tSTAPFRPORT Environmental Assessment. and Parcel Map 9180 February 29, 1986 Page 2 f. Site Characterisica ° °: The site is vacant Arid slopes in a southerly ` i direction. II. AN This parcel map divides 6.47 acres into 3;narcels for future in ustrial development, "Lion Street is to be constructed upon recordation of the parcel map. s �:• Missing off- -site improvements on, Hellman Avenue will be completed when Parcel 3 develops. Utility Undergrounding '• No overhead utilities exist fronting this project, however, lines do exist on-the opposing side of Hellman Avenue. It is' recommended an in -lieu fee equivalent to one -half 04 the of established cost of undergrounding 229 feet of frontage be paid prj;or to building permit iasuance for Parcel 3' and that all services Ito the entire site be provided underground. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of t e Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and mrl has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed' in the Daily Report Newspaper. posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input ana' elements of Tentative Parcel Map 9180, If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, 1/J711�C.� ERN: M: j as Attachments: Vicinity Map Tentative Map Resolution '- Recommended Conditions of'Approval Initial Study L� TENTATIVE a MARCH, taus A �� o .`s "Iflr I or r:sa[tts 4� 4 L AP O IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSSCIAT¢s saawuBt 316 fa>T •E< SP.. BEING A ZWtSICN OF A PORTION OF LOi 7 DR, R PLAT OF A SU[OtVt310N f LOT 10. CUCAuQNG4 YINET4R0 TRACY. 41 PER UA3 RECORDED }N 80DR 20., l7iH.7 Sf -SBIe y PAGE is OF Y4P5• RECORDS OF SAa 8ERN4WOINO COUNTY'•. CALIFORIIIA E45EMeATS AFF[GTIN6 TNtp PARC,L ,T AR[ } �' Npr pLaTTCo-y - :BENCH MARK L TD CUCAMONpI NN[Y4RD Cp IPA PIPT[': KS LE1D TIGS N CURD 1T1 8T.' P[R 4a4•FAAE i•1 OP pEE04.i pD Lf. RSC - EST OFN¢LLMAN 4YE: k TQ COUNT7 Or �J }D FDR olwl4E E F .ucc E:LE.V. 1120,.44 �„ . ►RR 41Ai <n4e 4w DR. rapo- CD OWNEIZ .' S'TO YSIM Wt POR DRII[UtpG PU[PDSLS L4NpC4 FINANCIAL GORro; TIDN. P[R LeL2a iMp6 ST Q4 tP S DD CO •fo SD EL }tOtINO IYE aSU1TC 101. " MABS, N N tYa1Nw6" CT A4 FOR 011IN40E PAewpFNq, CA. 91IO} 1 � PURabX4 1[R 8[42 <IA6C nI.QR Of S6D CO m4 }44q�2422 . UTILITIES.. ' �Yn sT ELEC Rlc �.. a si 1C•Ai4� r+leDU ca a. GAS C7y�B84�"VI C ID ..) SCALE 1' +IOGa PNONE a0 R M I- iL PItlNp, Pp ► alts . 4[s - S 4 -. 1 7 5?- W[RAYAT£R -6 A C..NTY.WT= D* u en sr a (i EXISTING. «ONING VICINITY .MAP veo4xeR LaT'7 w.z. s. Fn -R•aN r<c snR[ n >ilsnkct SCT w RICe pFaRll>uL >aeITT FpR xaeTx N. M(Nr 7�, 6A]rtRpr T PA¢>PCCp i. . 1 T£7.- 9TH • ~ StTi9�2YC 19>ia L2• _. _ _• - -' 1 ST EXISTING !11 {p EXISTING TTSA j T— T>i`,"IX.+w„at aff { [: GENERAL ' GEM-9 AL I a > 4e I i 1 v.rc4 r44 ,. • F - - - INDUSTRIAL A 4.-_1 I, $ 1 EXISTING ^ VI Ilk GENERAL E ! Al }1,r I INDUSTRIAL 'Ia INDUSTRIAL I x I jl i Ali i 1 R I a d {,I 'P'a'. ZY -$� c�tiT•rK1OR :`aYi -n t VACANT I a. " 4[G 1`LP - } x 1 C Fp 2•EP I4 4a Nor Fa i• �Il I Rcc a]ta S Y/tZr }i y1 STxLT GPr lOTµe NTNtLY I L.. • u a _ � _�1 ' § -_I 1 i.. a31 p0 F FT - -T] - -� PR[NUfI SlT ,�,Je2ftY Q r o - :"x I' �1�-7_ roA A— FupwsuiR fi'p+ .� G S Lt>tt [+no r� w ¢ PARCEL✓ srn ` TVr PARCEL c.1.Pn ' � R 1 I l "� plplr` i f WZ•efGiLN�2A Mpxp4 yaCkDIST_'Aba 'I ' t t"a i+� _ L.,-" �IpR VS [ ;CSC [R IQl4•/[t MIjIYL R 1� ICI i` !'� "O a STNLY u.;; LOT, Se <p2CA LDi 7� �`al p NIIL ON LINE � Ygi, - � "•TC". LCT7 PP' ➢UCEp �"2:w. EA>TRR�f UI _ �_ Fp i•oD:SP X h�x�MO.w eacpp] 4. .„,—V A GAN:T _ w 13, KR -wlt 8 < x 3 tiI j, 5 JIB W ` SYf R•it R.: / °UNp¢R RLE61;L[ SOUTH LINE SECT. 0- i• pRAK. CAP Wr FM 1VAll N =9 'In R£MAI W6 TICS M R t TRIGCS D ¢[•C >TaeL ex[O .m mO FOR f[a CDRN[R .Q FON S4. CORNER 4[CTION. FOS` x b R n PRpM w>saC[apRi, +'? 'W SItVEY CF PK.if16a GS;II D, fb]PR/98 f= ►Pl 6[)4.7' ` A9 -IV '�'�' EXHIBIT ' °3" ,� w ` za . E1�01I1ENTAL• R-E �IVI [�r7 w �,l APPLICATION '` II�TiTIAL Sv P „4 1977 _ART I GENERAL %' For all 4. projects requiring .environmental review this form moist be. completed and submitted to tie Development Review Ca'�1hnittee through thw department where ' the project application is Bade. Upon receipt of tf�1s application, the Planning Divi'siun siaff will, Part II of the Initial <St11dy and ma%e recommendations to 'Pl0nngng Coraaission. The Planning Commission wk111' make :one of three determupiitrons.' (1) The project; will gave no„ ignaficane environmental mpa t- .and a Negative, Deej4ratioh tzi.11 be fi ,e� (2j fie. �.. project wilI have a •_ 14,rliicant environment i impact and an''~ Environmental •A Impact Report A 1Tibe prepared, or (3) ran additional information rephrt should be supplled;By' the applicant. giving further information cancern,ing the proposed project. '} Date Filled° Project Title: P.M. g 9180 Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: Landco Corporation ' 150 So_ El Melino Ave Suite 101 _Pasadena, CA 91101 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: ' r. Donald Hornbeck { Location of Project.; <f= West Side of Heliman Ave, 500' So. of 9th St., Rancho, Cucamonga Assessor's Parcel No,: , n_ , 4 list other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: f 0 r PROJECT OESCRIPII'UN Proposed use nr'propos.ed. project: This v roiece s_ to divide existino-- „-i ;. - a __ r l Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and prop ed buildi'ngs, if any: _;Proiect site is 6.47 acres in area There are no existing buildincsand none or000sed Describe the erlviran„ ntal Bettina of the project site including information on topography, soil stability, pnants taffies }, land animals, any cultural, historical ur scenic aspects, land use of surroun'din description of any existing structures .` tad their usproPertiPS, and the sheets!: (attach necessary Site is vacant except for native rass cover at resent time. .torroundine parcels are light indus[< ^iala L There are no historical or ca'Stural aspects involved. i Is the project part of a larger -�� g project, one of a series of cumulative "I actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact •p�*•- +-ra a+^r -p a � } r+Zn '-ar ''w 's -'�z} MILL THIS PROJECT: YES. "r.Q 1. Create .a substantial change in ground contours? 2.,, Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce _. vibration or glare? 3. Crea!:e a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, ctc.)f" ,( 4. Create changes in'the existing Zonis) or General Plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? Now many? " 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flamnables or explosives? x Explanatio,i of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily.^ gone S. Estimate t4_ ee number of auto and truck trips generated daily'-by this projec 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting` and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: Nnnf, 10. If the project : volves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the text page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required Jor this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are ti-ue and correct te,the best 3f my knowledge: and belief. I further understand that additional inforrtstion may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation c?a be made by the Planning Division. Date: ia, Signature L . Title � 14 7. RESIOFM—,1ALa INSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to-the City Planning Division, in order to''aid 'distrl�Gt of Rancho Qcamor�,ga the school in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development . pevelnl+ers at<e required to secure letters from t :school dlsirict' for acco '*odating� the; increased number of students td issuance-of prior building permits. Name, of Developer and Ten;,ative,Tract No. - iJ Specific Location of Project,� r _ " PHASE I PHASE 2 UPHASEi3 ti\ PHASE 4 TOTAL Number of single family units. 2. Number of mul ipl2 - - family units, 3, Date proposed to begin construction: _ ij- 4, Earliest date of occupancy rc r Model ` and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range R _ - )t r. IJ t. J3 1-4 • n Ya;! t i 4 t RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, Off, THE CITY "tiF RAi�£,!O CUCAMONGA,= CALWORNIA, APPROVI -N.G PAROEL MAP NUMBER j 910 (TENTATIVE. P(IRCE( ,MAP NO. 9180) LOCATED,, SOUTH 'OF y NINTH STREET," ON THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN'AVENUE (APN WHEFOS, Tentative Parcel Map Number X3180, submitted by Landco { Financial Corporation and consisting of _3 parcels, located 500 feet_ south of Ninth Street;ron the west side of Hellman Avenue, bung a divsiar of "a portion of Lot 7 of ' plat of a'subdivision' of Lot 10, Cucamonga Vineyard Tract, as per map r cc,brded. din Book 20, 'page 44 "G.f maps, San BernardiIiip' County; California; and ` WHERE A$, 1 n May 8,4 1985, a formal application wpp1 as,--:submitted requesting reidew rrr th4 -Above described Tentative Map; and 1- WHEREAS, on Pebr�uary 29 1986, the Planning Commissio'd held ,a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. ' v FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA pU.,;dNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:, 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plans 2, That the improvement of the pro "posed subdivision is dOnsistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed developm'nr i 4, That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, p' -sir c health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and a Negaiive Declaration is issued on February 29, t 1985. SECTION 3 That Tentative Parcel Map No. 9180 is approved subject to the rer_ommen a fonditions of Approval pertaining thereto.. i i i I 77, rte"�'-`ryy y 1 •1 U 4 AY- n APPROVED D Y406PTED TS 2T, DAY OF FEBRUARY 1986. PLANNING. CO�MISSLO�� OF THECITY OF RANCFIO GiJCAMONGF4a,,K 1 ; Dennis L. Stout;, Ch tr�xn - 1,Y ATTEST: )I 'Brad Bul ler, Depury s. ecretry • 1 I, Brad Buller, Deputy tee re, ag, of.the Planning Cdnttnlssren of Rancho Cucamonga, the City of do hereby certify th t the fbreggiog �i<solut�on lras dt and reg� J'arly introduced, passed, and , atlo6 e b 'the �1 City of Rancho Cucamon 9' ' �� lu g mmassan ofd xhe at'at a re uI 9 r g?t`h athe.,Plean�r�ng CcrRmis5ion`heTd on the 29th day. of °1�ebruary; 1986.' ne follcwjAg vote ' AYES: COMMA''S STONER S: NOES: COMI`1ISSInp ACS• C ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I I , r, � l , ' {:ITT`.OE RANCHO CUCAMONGA`" 1tECMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATICH: 500 feet south`of Ninth Street TENTAT" VC PARCEL MAP HO: .."9180 4 west side of Hellmanrhenue DATE FILEDay B, 1985 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: _A portiron of Lot 7 of a NUlIsER'OF LOTS: 3 subdivision of Lot 10. r5ucAmnnn:, Vineyard GROSS ACREAGE: 6.47 1 �. Tract, as per map recorded in Book 20 naae ASSESSOR PARCEL No: 209 - 013 -24 44 of 4iaps, San Bernardino County,'Califorttia DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEERISUEtVE!'OR L�mdco Financial Corp Same Associated Engineer+ 1130 S. Ei Malino, 'Ste-101 316 East 'E" Streit M.. P, asadena, CA 91101 ffi Ontario, CA 91761 _ - " Improvement and',dedication requirements in accordance with TitTe 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Ranch3 C;.•camorga include, but:,may not be limited to, the following: A_ Dedications and Vehkular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -tray and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication shall be made ,of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: 60 _ feet on Lion Street additional feet on additional feet on r 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall li`e dedcated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agveeaents ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all commen roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C. &R.s AML and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. X 6, All existing,easements lying within future right of,way area to be uitclaimed or delineated on the map. p per City Enginee''s requirements,' "' A. =% Z. Easements for 'sidewatY for public use °shad be dedicated to the Cityere sidewal!� eander through private property: B. ,S�'reet..Impr64 menu Pursq', to the #city of Ranck, Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 15, Section 16.36:120, the s" enter- into an agreement and post secuxiiywith the City quaranteging the required construction prior to recordation of the reap and /or build* ° g permit issuance.;, 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not Iimited ta, curb anO- gutter; A.C. pavement; sidewalk, drive approaches, < parkway trees and street lights on ;all interior streets, 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide ;pavement within a 4h foot wide 'dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half -' section streets. X' 3. Construct the following missing,improvements: 1. ;• Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street A. C_ Meo "an +� f Street Name Gutter Pumt. Walk Appr.. Trees Lights Overlay Islander Other ' FIe7lman itv$nue X_ " aik Lion Street X X X X X X 4 *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter jl X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of- `way,. fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained t frcn the City Engineer's :Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plars shall be ,prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and apo,.aved by the City 'Engineer prior to issuance of an , encroachment permit. n p r t 6, Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. _ 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undernrounded X S. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, ttri €ing and markings with locations and types approved by the _ C tj F=,:igineer. x 9. Street Bight' locations, as required, are to be approved b iforni a' Edison Company `Ramon .• and. the �Citjr of °cho` + 9.r -` shall be on .,decoretfI;e undergrund •service. 10. Lands ape and irriga lon .pl'9ns shall -6e• submi -Fted toc' and M" aPProved," by the Pl ?nning Di'virsior� 'prior to thei issu n~e of build'i.ng;permit� �" 11. Concept t- Qrainage flows shall not ;cross sidew:3lks. Undersidewal,k drains shall; be installed `! to CrtyIStanderds. C. Surety - sy _ _ ,1. Surety sha11 be posted and:• an' agreement execyte�d, to =� satisfaction of the °> City Engir,3�r � abd Cit rn guarantiee1ny completion , of ;the public imprauemetitsptoey, to recordaion 'of the Fi:nai Map for' prior Lions Street acid to bu7d7ng��perit issuance for Hellman•'pvenae.', 2. Alien agreement -must be executed prior to record for ing of the map fallowing 3 Surety shall be posted and an - agreement .executed; guaranteeing completion of all on -site, drainage fkilites '`necessary for dewater*.+g all pAreels to the - satisfaction of the Dui -lding and Safety Diwison Pr or to recording ,Ifor and /or prior to issuance of building Permit for .' D. ^.^ainage and Flcrac� Control ��' 1. Private drainaga easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and--shall be delineated or noti6Id'on the final map. X 2. Adequate,�provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal'jI , of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. TWt,I following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4, Prior :o recordation of the map, ,a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be subh`itted for review. to the City Engineer, 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall, be constructed to detain increased runoff -3- E. Grath F Y 1. Grading of the subject property shaP be in accordance with the, r• Uniform, Building Code,, City: Grading, Standards and accepted grading practices. .. The final grading plan shall be in substantial ronforq=F_ with the approved conceptual grading. plan. X'' 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a ,qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of buil.diing permit. j. F geological report shall be prepared =by a qualified engineer or geologist, and - submitted' at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The.final grading•�plan shall be subject to review and approval' by` the Grading CGmmiatee and shalt be' completed < prior to recordation of,­ the final -, subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety .Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. F. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be. required as follows: CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control "flistrict X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer, and water X San `Bernardino County Dust Abatement (requi,ed prior to a issuance of a grading permit)' Other i 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved-by the City Attorney is required ptlior to recordation of the map. X 3. Pr;��Sde all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. "this subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other r interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requiremments that.,may be received from them. i -4 F 1. r ( x �.' dr. .., fr ;X „� 7- ,G+e fllin,g of the teitative.mao; <,or approval of sine does guarao that ..sewer .treatment capacity will +be ,' uaj iule� at i tlie,%' eA�building pergtIM* are .requested +When bulldin d` gapela� �s are requested, , thew Cucamonga. `'Coin "y Water O�stict Wka'11 be asked to ;certify the av ail lablityof c;bzcity permits;` w�dli trot be Prue, sunless .said! ccrtifi,eation cetved �(n WCti ima� ! 4 8 °�� "oval and Masfrer Planned Trails sh'a11 be pcnvided i ikaccordance {vith" th'e Trail Plan. A detailed trail p7aft inc��cat�►ng wtG�tFjS; maxhinum slopest,,physical conditions, fencing and weed ^cantpol, in accordance with..Catty traii standards shali be Sub i t d to and approved, by, the City Planner �pior oterd�atiCon for an pr tab_ut�dltgpermit H issuance For r. s 9. " Prior to, recording, a deposit shat %, be, posted with t e City. covering the estimated cost, of a pport7oning the�as�sm�estts `under ilsse,�smegt-0� strict 82 -1 among the :newly crei e Is X I0. At the time of final map submittal, the foil wzin sEia`11 be submitted:. Title Report, ,traverse calculat�orrsg (sheets), j copies of ` recordei maps and : 'deeds'' us-ad as- re�rerence and /nr showing original land division, tie .notes`. at�d benc�i.,.fiar�CS l referenced. x., x 12. Notice of intent to join the praposq# than I =stand Landscape District sh4li be filed with tc� Zity• :Council prior to recordation of the Final Map. P G. Special Conditions' X 1. An offer of dedication to the City for a.,65 foot wide drainage easement in line with the existing -easement on the property�to the north shall be provided over Parcel 2. The easement could be reduced in width 'upon the, installation of a drainage facility within the easement as,�pproved by the City Engineer. X 2. Hellman Avenue is subject' to flooding, therefore, flood ' protection measures will be required for development of Parcel 3.. A flood report substantiating those measures will be required and shall be approved by the City Engineer. x 3. A minimum 15 foot wide 'drainage ,easement along the south ` boundary of Parcel 2 for drainage from Lion Street,shail be provided. X 4. An emergency all weather access from Parcel 3 to Lion Street ° over Parcel 2 shall be provided upon development of either Parcels 2 or 3. i minimum 20 foot wide easement 'for this purpose shall be shown on the final map. •' # , ( X �tb t shall be" constructed prior to Deco anc ' b6i" jugs° on anx of the parcels. � , Y •,vf X ' � TBe a Pl cant shat l ply -prior .to ins u ce of -h„it 'S " = � ;i�nperm_ on' �• Pa►ce«7 3 ,a fee Yn- lieuof urtde;round� g the $ver ead utlttles a'iq g`�jfellm3n A,v2rsue: Said f a shall on �ha1f of_the front n Avenue, ost of pnderground 119 for the p o'ect I roniage on ell ma r �a { •'.. CITY OP" RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD'. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: t 6 � w �e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA U�C,tiro�c STAFF REPORT 2 % Cl 0 0 Fj _Z DATE: Feti u ry 26, 1986 U 1977 a TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner `s BY; Howard Fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT- 12420 RANCHO PARK VILLAS - The development of 1 0 single family' attach Gnits. on 14,3 acres of land in the Low Mediumrr Residentiah�District (4 -8 du /ac' at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue - APN 209- 161 --04, 05, and 06. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivisic:., site plan, elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration.. B. Surroundirg Land Use and Zoning- .North - Vacant, Industrial Area Specific, Subarea 3. South - Existing Santa Fe Railroad, Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). East Existing single- family residential, Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). West - Existing Santa Fe Railroad !ow Residentiai (2 -4 r` du /ac). C. General Plan Oesi nations: 'Project Site - Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). North - Iq'.;trial Area SPecific Plan, Subarea 3. South -: Low ,tedium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). East Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). West Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) D. Site Characteristics: The project site is located adjacent "to Cucamonga Creek Channel and has a triangular lot configuration with a slope approximately 3% from north to south. Presently,, the site is vacant with a mature Eucalyptus windrow that traverses the site from north to south, six (6) mature Palm trees along Hellman Avenue and some mature Eucalyptus trees scattered throughout the subject site (see Exhibit ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF *REPORT 17 12420 - RANCHO PARK VILLAS a ' February 26, 1986 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. G eneral: The proposed �development comprises three (3) phases and consists of 110 single- family attached units (7.7 du /ac) along an internal circulation loop. Dwelling units- arranged around motor courts (see Exhibit "D "). On the wester,,' p9rtion of the s•te plan, several courts extend into c��ntra.lized,`open ��pace area with dwelling units clustered '6n boO sides of the .driveways. The development provides a good' distribution and guest parking with 59 stalls spread throughout the project site. The project will be serviced by three (,3 }, points, of entry with security gates. The maims entry along Hellmar,;Avenue is slated to be coistructed in the first ;phase. At the extreme northwest corner of the site, an "o1 ,Cparcel k" (,8 acres) exists contiguous to the project bounddr5t� Staff directed the applicant to master -plan this parcPT' s�) that r future residential development is feasible and would 7�d'legrate With the project proposal (see Exhibit "B "). However', due to the gated entry concept of the project, no reciprocal access will be required, Instead.- "out " :parcel will be serviced by separate driveway. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project on several occasions using which major revisions were requested E to the site plan for better building orientation to open space area. The Committee reviewed the revised site plan and i., recommended approval subject to: landscaping pockets with evergreen tree types next to garage, d <,ors, five foot minimum landscape area from curb face to pri,tate, perimeter fencing, and re- designing chimneys from masonite siding to 'stucco exterior. In addition, the Committee recommended elevations that the recreational building - elevations should reflect- architectural elements of dwelling units and also directed the applicant to provide design details of all fencing including recreational areas and private open space.,, 'he appr.,,ant made recommended revisions to his development pans. C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee recommended farf block: in various areas for access of firefighting trucks (see Exhibit "D "). In addition, the Committee recommended that at such time that flood improvements are made to Hellman Avenue, the 6th Street entry will revert back to secondary emergency entry only, with knox tox and gates. lastly, the Committee P recommended underground')'ng of all overhead utility lines (excypt 66 K.V or larker electrical lines). No overhead util ,'ties exist fronting project on Hellman Avenue, however, lines do exist on the opp.sing, side fronting Hellman, Avenue. i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 12420 RANCHO PARK VILLAS February 26, 1986 + Page 3 __ of It is recommended that the applicant be required to pay an in `+ 1'ieu fee equivalent to one -half of the established cost, of undergrounding the opposing lines the length of the project. On 6th Street, there are two poles along the project frontage which carry both '66 K.V. and 12 K.V. and overhead telephone lines on the opposite side of 6th Strcet,. It is recommended that the applicant pay an' in-lieu fee egliit��lent to one -half of the established cost of modergrounding tie 12,K.V. line and the telephone line across the street.The apX,lican'. agreed with all of the:,Committee's recommendations. D. Environmental Assessment; Fart I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part lI of the Environmental Checklist and, found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of th(s project. However, due to site plan configuration and driveway alignment, the applicant has filed a tree removal permit which indicates removal of a mature Eucalyptus windrow, six (6) mature Palm trees along Hellman Avenue, and some mature Eucalyptus trees on a the project site. As mitigation, staff is requiring AM replacement trees on a one to one basis of 15 gallon size Spotted Gum (Eucalyptus Malculatta) and also recommending that the six (6,,aature Palm trees be saved and re- located elsewhere on the project site (see Resolution Conditions #13). If the Commission concurs with said findings, then issuance of a Negative Declaration wc%uld be in order. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on—'the attached resolution are supported by the following facts: 1. The project site is adequate in size and shape to accomodate the development and the proposed residential uses are in accordance with objectives of the General Plan and Development' Code. 2. The proposed site plan, in "conjunction with Conditions of Approval, is consistent with the current Development Standards of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Repcmt - newspaper, the property posted and notices were sent to ailf property owners within 300' of the subject site. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct ;'a :public hearing to consider public input and elements of this project. If after such consideration, the Commission concurs wlt,,rthe Facts for Findings and recommended Conditions of Approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuence of 4 Negative Declaration weurd be appropriate, k` gaps fF�EPQ &AT�� � I� T7` 12420 February 2 Page,4 1 • �J'+ C4_ Res pjeqtfully c,, _:itt,e Zad B Buller City Planner BB:HF:ko Attachments: Ezh,bith "A:' - L�oca -.,t p � Exhibit "B" - Si tie Map 6h'i it "C" - .Situ Plan *: R Exhibit ;',,Du Landscaping Plan Exh7biti "E" Eleuai orbs Exhlibit "F" - Eh�ry.an'y 03,rectory 5ign> Detail i Exhibit "G" - Fraeding Flab` Exhibit "H" - kator Court Details Exhibit Bnil�fing Elevations & Floor Pt.�� Part U of t ,e Initial° Study o Resolution of -\Approval with Londitions i N1 A- qr Vic.___. MH .1 I (1� �A FC 4 PC 17 ■■rr H ► �. �� — GC .ms GC ME! V �. k k' i 111tIYi t A i I.S.P. #i i a 4 ca ,tta L L a E 1. S. P 4 • �k'a�eT' SITL t 1 COY f v..ro Cirf T OF MINI. 42 V.7 o NC3r2'I'H RANCED CUCAMONGA TrmEt��7ic�ifl PLANNNU DIVISION EXHI rr-- -L �`: SCALE' o1 $ r • c:>a r r` ��; vo 180 l i �nw G •JNausTAUt PARK t� f NORTH CITY Or i RANCHO Cf ivlO`GA TITLE,, 4/72r PLANNING DIVISIaN EXHIBIT��SCAI.Ir= �aeaenat rNarsseru:y o1 $ r • c:>a r r` ��; vo 180 l i �nw G •JNausTAUt PARK t� f NORTH CITY Or i RANCHO Cf ivlO`GA TITLE,, 4/72r PLANNING DIVISIaN EXHIBIT��SCAI.Ir= � �'�" PF1.tSE,10 �rHASEI S EHTH STREET (GO1 ®I - fOp - - � 14 W ® DATA t. r OWNER _••.,,, i C) (O © }} 1 �} J � •� % r .� �. ` � � l eae cEaaca.EJlr : t ` 1 0 Q 3�4ttT1EVU uoo .fa'POi� BCACJ(CA. TAa"T- �' BUM w w /T$e oo LWOMAM n c ;` i CIAOUCE 32iT44 ei.a �l :tt C7' �. tip "�T•I� ' • 40.300: 7"71 4 ! I ♦ ' '�..4 y µ• .E+uGliait AVVG I46.600 24, y .�(' �..o _ 1 •J G' > !1: l'1.. gal `ARZAREot.. —led I25,0U] { U •l_ rf � +NOSr ALOES .�- NET AOr ouraeFt t -.•..1 7.7 'Acsa UNIT CaJNT aTC ss :. ,`` - \� y �• �1 1Pi VASE Z3 PHASE 11f`'�} -.y . --- ,y'f j O • PHASING 1_12 PHASE Z ♦ DZ • l '1, y ! ..1 tl.. I CO -E 10 p }HAS... 'S". ••••••• � \`� }` 1 Gc'; � ,L • 1aA1NMO 1T a e 0�A p iNI'N45A1T1:eOV. G G 01l4aP Y CX O P A flkEYA4S G Is, T o PHASIXo _mil_ STREET_... �..•..e•. "r.•..�..�e.:a.... �.� 31kTH SIXTH "QE—y - i — AFCai�CVER T4HpAt' �NORT.H RANCHO CUCAMIO.NLGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVLSI4�I Ca.-1 E�P"'T =— ��SCALE'.._ - Bev-,4w STREET � Y, W, KEY: \[ i p' Mpj vae�� �� �. Pte. h►x. 's („ �s � f � � "rt "� a +ti► xn.. +oae., aso 9F k {ti IdW.AF, I..IW...h. n. j •L, BM°i.l PLANT PALETTbi s BOOF PLANS 2 cm w 't w ➢MtiraC IZ TR NnRTH �� SIXTH STREET __•� ��\ CITY OF RANCHO O F C L rC �IQ TGt ITEIN1: -T- r/a y .2 rITLr,. ebyee =;Ff Q P NI `ds C: , JLSION'r� . � EXHIBIT: 'P SCALE -�.._ .^ y ^_.Y i�' tiff }7� "� � 1 � •-� �� Y rT.• y � � r � I � MOTOR CO p - ENTRY ELEVATION •'Y' SU;LDING SIOE ELEVATION Y' 1111111111111 no y. 7 TWO STOAlf PLAN - 910E ELEVATI� N: . ^. 1!�•u � 'Lill t . SIN - GLL r STORY PLAN - SIOE ELEVATION � Rao Gig[. •.!ti �- ' j!!/q�� tai Vii' Y Burp ,�� ^`���� EuE WL_.i[ .GN l� pn is / I.E N -- -'ROM *f ELLNSAti'..• ��ai2 H CITY or RANCHO CLT ' > CAMCr GA PLI�1<INiI\ y`1DIVISIQ:V TITLE- EXHIBIT: _ SCALE -. `---- I C ^� i. i err.�rawr _ t'e� i Ld ail- ®a9 ��0®®q�'�lul+ �rl�sysal �a �.��� �im_11�n�»q! _ I�_ �IIIII( ��I� (�L(d�ttlupl(I_Ueimi�uiip���I(► .�,f� F - r y mLp not-, G _ - ' . � �� —' ;r,;;••,w:�.� _ r IINI IIIII a � II��III(I�I� �r (( ?� . -ii'ar s %: tADRTH CITY ® RANCH .Lo CLTCA TONGA TI-rLE. 1' x., aAaAr,� E�vAno� t Y',,°•�IIIrEfltin�` 1� al-t•,�.�fi�3�l11 <<I `"�� �.�� �.. »' Ila. RECREATION BUILDING y SOUAIIE FOOTA GE. .6 a tOUNGE + : TO ] KIYCHE.4 MEN 7C ♦ WOMEN Y12 f - - Zit - � - �' TOTAL' WIG ' FLOOR PLAN NORTH CITY OT` IRANCI -1p CLTCAMO.NL GA 11"E"", 11"E"", •>.-�,a ���___ TITLE--OZ--3'Z T 2 e PLANNING DIVISION —�_ G_1 ♦ i Ea . . . . . . . . . . . . CLE VA T10H 1F CO MTm*L ALE V.. r,O o A eNtnANcz r RLNCE DES tGN- SEVENTH 3TREEF y , 1 � 1 ELE��iIOh -f 'tHC�L v��CBOK ^.l TRar�CE JES,GN• riELLMAN • iEE ig ItOr" 3Ta EET Oii.C" �OR4'.Ylt.l, VOTES ENO SVeCIflGTWwi ~_- -- - }~ -- CITY Or RANTCp O! �Gl TITLE.L►TA', PLANNING DIVISION Elf IIl3i I' ELF �� SCALE- I r § t � � ') • u � .` � , \'- ` 1 \ � ; � \\ \� i •`.. 2✓ ' till .11/� } S r'�,/I i f� .. c t � - rte• s- � �� ` - \` _ �-'� , re I NKDRTII jai TI`CLE EXHIBIT- --- SCALE= �rx . \\ � � I I + .�r• i CITY Off' RANCHO CUCA it d —s TMONG PL!"NlNr, DIV 11 ' [ rt. r ; A.R 11K �.�.,. AP Ire ��s�- t�- �xr --�`t� .mss. �s,� ��. �t�. r.-� `�s �a •ate � C • Crry CF 7. r. 12 4ez4) .j ,r { i mowd Dim 11 MEN .4 ate_ e - � ��r�t;�ii it �i��1r�'; ►���rt��,;� . , �.1: �'(�� z:.�.�,,. _ 4.� svetrN RECR cAi'! ®N .B4J1laDl[VG SOW E FOOTAGE; .f $ TINGE . � . ' _:358 _ I • Eug1 70 MEIN 212' BfME N 212 • TOTAL 860 l Cff j /t +t/1 � `j/ 12 RANTCM CUCAMONGA nTu: PIANNM Div ON; EX M: "z" SCALE: .x ��, '4,v i" t ' ,; �•� it tir �.,•., �' �• rI t NORTH ITEM Yc o C1Z Y ()T�' RANK C�tN(7A TIT] PLANNING DIVISKY`3 t: \tlti2(T: `J"ss ,•••r -•—= SC'.1L1: ,. :':, i7 #tea ,., .�, - '� . ti ' CITY OF xA.vcxo c�c�,�so�cA PART II - INITIAL'STLDY ENYZRON. NTAt CHECKLIST ;t DATE: DEC .a ffirs- ri, a " f ILZNC DATE: ltJAffr JS� $ �OG NUMBER: 7--'1-1- PROJECT: _ ird �__Llsr!:•fs one /riJ:3AC. PROJECT LOCATION; IYJWe_ ev, ATM ST�26ET RNb L�LG+►!.Kr/ V, I. ENVIROMIENTAL?;ZSpACTS " (Explanation of all° "yes"` and "maybe" answers are required sheets). on attached YEb :LAYBE No 1. Soils and Geolo£v. Will "the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground .Ineitionsror in changes in geologic relationships?' ` b. Disrupt{,ons, displacements, compaction or ro burial of the soil? k� C. ,Change in topography or 1-„d surface Contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification Of any unique geologic or physical features? e• Any Potential increase in Wind or wager erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f f, Changes in erasion siltation, or deposition? Y ✓ g* Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, "or'similar r ground failure, haz. -Tds? Ve h. An increase in the rate of eXLracti,on and /or use of any mineral, resource? ' 2. HYd`ralo v, Will the proposal have significant results in: YES u4YSE \A a. Changes ip ;currents, or the cour?ie of direction of flooring streams, rivers, or Ephemeral stream channels ?' b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and .......... amount Of surface water runoff? ✓ / C. Alterations to th',coutse or flow, of flood waters? d- Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or a, alteration of surface water quality? r f. Alteration of groundwater ciiaracteristits?r�'( ..ql! g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawal_;'.' or though interfer(;nce aquifer? with an J Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related haza , such as floodij�- or seiches? 3• rer Quality. results in: Will the proposal have significant �j a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? ationary sources? b. Deterl,oratiod: of ambient air q:Aity and /or Interference faith the attainment of applicable air qua3.ity standards? c. Alteration of local or re gional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, or temperature? moisture 4. Biota f Flora. Will the proposal have significant results a, Change in a " d the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distributia ' or num! er of any _; Fecies of plants? b. Reduction Of the numbers.of any unique, or endangered species of plants? rare Y l �e INA r� YES. jam C. Introduction of NO- , 11 new or disruptive species,��of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the Potential for agricu tu(i ral'' � � � production? Y ' Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant'result.s Y ' a. Change in the c.Itaracteristi_s of species, including diversity, d distribution* or numbers of a b -• Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rai ur endangered spe ies of animals? ' c. Introduction of new or disruptive species 'jof I animals into an area, or result in a barrier / to the migration or movement o; animals? V I d. DeterilNration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat ?" ,1 S. Po`ou'- 'ition.. '`Will the proposal hay_ - significant Sesu.lcs i.• a. Will the V. oposal a! tet the location, distri- bution, density, d diversitp., or grow, „h rate o.t the huran population of ar ')ia? b. Will the proposal affect existin, housing, ar create a demand for`— litional,lhausing? b. Socio- Economic Factors. Wi -11 the proposal have significant results ins a. Change is local or.regionai socio- acoromic - - characteristics, including economlc or commercial divcts3;ty, tax rate, and property � valuer�3 __ l �+ b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficia::ies, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? f f' 7. Land Use and Flantine Considerations, Will the proposal have significant result- in:” a. A substantial alteration of the presr_nt or planned land use of an area ?' b.. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies,. Cr adopted plaits of any governmental entities? t� e. An impact upon the qulaity err - quantity of existing consumptive or non- tonsumptive recreational opportunities? d C is potential Mater -borne i3J oar - ,traffic? ,� • f r a- Intre35es in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or` pedestrians? F t ^. Cultural, Resource Will the proposal have t significant results in: :. a. A disturbance to the,xAtegrity of archaeological, paliDntblegieal,, andjor historical resources? _ cr 10. Rn!al th Saie v, and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposai have significant results in: a. Crecticn of any health hazard ox potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to ?,otentiaZ health hazards? - c. A risk Of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accidenz? d. An increase in the nwiber "of individuals l or species of vector of pathanogenid organisms or -the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Inc%ma5e in existing anise levels? £- Exposure of, zrtpls to potentialZy dangerous ` noise levals? o ^! €- The creation of objectionable odors? -_ 11 jai increase in light or glare? ___ ......... /� m— . . _ r ` j YES L'L y wi . 8," Transacrratient Will the r results in- proposal have significant ' a, m _ movement? o ' b b, Effeets on existing streets ` ` nett streer.-,.constructigne`i °r demand= for c. Effects on existing parking f - Ylities,, n nor demand for u6is parking? _ d. 5ubstantial:impact. upon exstin g trap p : porta- : I r e. Al.rerat_Jns £s / iX d donor movement Of "people andlorgoods ?�' f. Alterations to or effectss on p � r present and. _ 1 : increase in the demand for development of J sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non- renewable forms of energy triter feasible ',enewabie sources of 'energy? E available? . l 7 r! . Page S S'r" YtSS _ ILAN E " " No 11. A Aesucetics Will the 'proposal have significant z z .s in: a. The obstrtit: ton '�Ir °'3egradation of 3 sceac any vista; or vie, f f w z. — — V r b b. The c4eatfon of an aesthetwcatly offensive site? { { C. A conflict'v.th the ob;jectt -4e Of designated ? ?r or Po ten tiai~ s ^enie corridors? ,. h A2- U Utilities and Public Sees. Will the proposal ' nee -for new systems, alterations to,the following: a.' Electric-paver? b. Nart�ral or packaged gas? C'. Commuuications systems? d. Wa"er supply? ih 3 e. Wastewater facilities? 3/ f. Flood control structu, , • r °' ± e =_ g g. Solid taste facili.tl e V h. Fire protection? 3. lblsce Protection? Schools? l k, Parer _ _ l P --- �t -nance of public facilities, including .. toads and flood control facilities? M. Other ovet-amentai'services? 13. r r' -err?- and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal _ _ sesvlts a. Use of substantial or exGssive fuel or energy? b• &, stantial increase in demand upon existing - -� sources of energy? f YES e. 5ubs+tar "ial AOPletion of i any nonrenewable scar a n�a�ftural, re`source? nr ' 24. Mandato rvk' "'s Findin s of �SYttZificance goes the peot ha'e the 'potential to d Wade the quaditp °of,thn�nvio apnt s bn "ant3� reds fe} t4„e habztit'c"f f3sh� or niii� i�. � r� T ie.speczes;.,J cause a fish or w'1`dli£e.,o ulatiAn to drop P P tir be-16w, serf §usttaining �eae]:s, threaten t4^ ettiainate a ;E z x..� Pl�nt�*lir and Zoc�csnitY, �eluen� • tl }e° ntmber: ox rest act the`,zang_ -of a, rare or _ endan eyed �• e for Ord imi�a +te impor� ant cncamples of the ma3o periods sf� California hf �= is to y or pzehst�ry? b. Does the Project, have Lse pot re nal to achieve short— the ds,radvarta p�f laag— aerzrenviroameota goals? sho tErim impact oh the environmernt .is' one Y7hich oc� ._, �.' s IYr a. relativelya, brief, def3sitive period of ,tame while 1 term impacts (gill endure well into :he .future) , C." Dees tine project haveAmpac:ts which arey 1 individua3ly limited,,, but cumulatively considerable? (EumulaVSZ!ely cbrsidersbie r =means that the increroai;`effegts of 11 ' incuviduul project axe conftu --i ie wh�tt` ✓iewed.. in connection with the effects of P4�5,t projects, and pstbable,, future a�rajects). d. Does the project have snvironinental effects W hich will cause substantial adverue effects on human beans either ..i�, f Jir g they d�,ect or indirectly? Ii. DISCUSSION OF Ei�'PTgONiITpi EVAlJnTIQ:t (i.e., of tfirmati-ae answers to the above questions pXti� a discussion of proposed mitigation at2a5ure ), ,._ SEE Arr'y'0HMC-At7'- S _ _ ,_. ter•' x 16.) Gradicig Apr proj'et prop osed wiT cause disruption and diiplacement }T however the en i; grading scheme w be r- evtpwed by ps� ;T;T7 f ng S frPiny Depzrtmerd: c4ns1si en y With; .Ci S Grad ;ng Ordinan e r s _ 2b.) Project pragosal tti1t1 ircrease imp @rvious surfaces �ihat iii= t creaire add 1!,ionaI4AurTAge � run -off. All aspects or dra4naga v -TV be -under the direct!() the City Lngineer (see, 120 2I.) The project Site 7s completely pwotected front f Odding �t roygh flood' . wz wal is and�'ot�iPr Measures required by the ngineering, Departmerr. Fiow.ever, ingress, and ,eg ,ss , to the projext+ fk4r<, 7tli Street4d rtley ,,an "t1 , - Avenue wl. e po, a peapsle to 'pe4lQdlC fTppdIng d'u v­ p�rtods of extensive rains, :Te vnlypoint cf ingress -antl" egraSS..durang'rainy 3r %ods is `Gth Street heading in a westerly di- recticrn. 4a.) The applicant i5 propos1ng to remove s maktu:re grate a,F,Zucalygtus trees, wh'(ch wild, require, a,. Tree, Removal Permit' and a tensive' r- plant.ing in, like kind'1 a4s 8a «b.1 `appropriate mitigation. The project proposal will create additional vehicular movement, which wi1,I require new street construction along 70 Street adjacent to north project boundary''to .101 beyond centc,riine a 7'th` Street. 12a.) Project will be'conditioned to undergroupd' all e�isting rverhead . , utilities fronting Hellmam, venue and 6th Street (except for and larger electrfical lines}'. I2f.) Developers �111',je conditi,ped to copstruct Hellman -Al ;tine as a major f water carry 1►g' street riquiring :`_X combination of spec aj curb heig'tts, commercial type drive approaches, 'rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and/or landscared eartiz,,berms and rolled driveways at property lines, r MR,151111 1111' Jill t�+ IEZ. 'DEZr !fib *t "`4 ". „ �L ti "a �� l7n the bas`i�s of t�iis�n�iaE' evalssation: i fn3 the:'r F��Pra3eSc ��ULD Nd hayc a s�nsrYca % xk 4�t eft t rte an' the, eslvIronmen Isd ta�110 &1 theropd1 ed �ro�eetbaldhae's ! e �,cc on "thee onmen th ncste a s3nHica}t e��t iti thi dd§ �tise tYeti! h atian measures i3esc�ea asi ai; attached sh hair �� add 4 1 eat ~x;to tine padect... DECL.SRA *sutV yTiLI$L�°�lRED r I f;tind the %prapos P oje�e °`L have as�fgniFf c�anta�et f.d tE o�` they ervi xtmetlt,; aad �h E`3t I T Y t b r t ti. F ^?I it u r ��,+�a 77 .k � RESOLUTION No. x A RESOLUTION '4 ►F THE PLANNING C6MMISSION OF THE CIV- OF RANCHO CU.CAMONGk C.4LIF6RNIA, j1 CONDI,rIONALLI'�' APPRiSVING, DESIGN REVIEW,AN0 TENTATIVE TRACt MAP NO. 12420 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map Na. l - I12420 hereinafter "Map" submitted by f s Pat 'FaV6rite, applicant,, for, the purposl� of subdividing the reap p�^op' erty situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga!! County of San Bernard ho., State', of California, described as.%he development�!of 110 single Family attar -lied un�[ts i on 14.3 acres of band In -the Low Medi.u�j Residential District (4--8 dulacL located at the northwest' corner of 6th Street and Hellman kvenue. into - 20 lots,,regul,�riy came before the `Planning Commission for public he;arrng action on February 26, '1985; and ;I :)WHEREAS, the City Planner has ve4mmended, appro-Uai of the flap subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning "Divis•ion's reports; and w WHEREAS, th'u Planning Commission has read' and considered the Engineering and Planniiio DivisiOn's'repori�� and has considered, other evidence presented at .the- publ t hearing. ' NOW, THEREFORE, the Pi�annillg C {�lr.aissn6h of the City of Rancho ^Iucamonga does resolve as follows'- SECTION 1 The Planning Commassr,n makes the roilowing fi'ndiogs in vegard to Tentative Tract No, 12420 and`th0Map thereof: (a). The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Cade„ and splc fir glans; (b) The design or improvements of 'fie tentative tract is consistent with the Gene -,al plAn, Development Coc;e, and specific plans; i (c) Th^ site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d), The 'design of the subdivision is iiot likely to cause 4 substantial environmental dama'1e and avoidable a,ijury to humans and wildlife or heir haoilzat; (e) The tentative tract is not 1ikely°,,to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict wi +h any easement acquired by the plsblic at large, -'nou of� record, for access through ?,or" use, of the pronarty within the proposed subdi,;is`ton. ', ji J M Pi ANNi;Pa COMMISSTait '� TT 12420.-= 'ES-aLU I FMCNO P'ARk` VILLAS ° �> February 26, 1986 Page 2 (g) T4at this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Decl "oration is issued, SPZTION 2 iantative Tract Mau Nc 12420, ., copy of :which '�s ` attached =' the her,to, is "hereby ,approved subject to all of the following coed` tons = and attaci+ed Standard.Condi,rions: Design Review: 1. Material sample board shall be submitted to the City i Planner for review and approval prier to issuance of building permits. 2. All fencing details and perimeter wall design shall be submitted to the,, City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance -of building.perr;its. Any wood fencing shall be water sealed or sta..rr::i. 3. ` Special landscaped statement (i.e.' accent trees, and shrubs, r-lf)w6rG4 ground Rover: , and rockscape treatment) S.ia ? be provided at all project entries and at 7th !Hellman and. &th; and Hellman. 4. Security ga e dEtails and project directory,, sign detail shall be s bmitted to the City Planner for review, and approval rO r, to`issuance�of building,germits, 5. All pedestrian linkages into Lzentralized opan space shall be delineated by accent trees and shrubs. G. Final landscaping' plan with uijifyino thence shall be submitted to tha, City Planner~'.+or review and approval prior to isscance of building permits. 7. A decorative perimeter wail or fence'shail be provided along Cucamonga Cr,2ek C`annei to the satisfactiot, of the — City Plansler. 8. A detailed` lighti g plan to include both high and low level lighting shall be sOmitteel to the City Planner for review and approval ' �o ;ssuance of building permiia. 9. Dense landscaping, 15 gallon trees (201 on center)'and shrubs shall be provided along entire west property line. zv. 01 wide texturized paving treatment (i.e. brick paver:) acr.ss circulation aisle as shown on site plan shai;9`be a provided. ttoLUTION ILLAS F br Pago 1 410 All, guest parking spaces ihall--6e, identified subject,to �City Planner revieW ard approva,,I prior to issuance of building perm-its., M Columnar ireesishrubs', shall be pUnted between 6 and f lanking; all garage door-s. 13. Six (6) mature Palm.trees along Hellman Avenue shall be saved and. re-locatedi elsewhere,­ within project site, subject to the approval of a tv�ie removal permit by City.� Planne- prior, to issuance of a r.)u h grading permit. Tentative Tract: I. The applicant shal.1 pay an in-lieu fee fdr undergrounding existing overhe�& 71uttlities fronting Hellman Avenue and 6th Street -for ovq'rhead utility lines (except for 66 K.V. and larger electr cal) prior to 'building' perimit issuance or tract recorda" htl 9on w 7chever occurs first�-�-: Said fee Shall be nne-hat�i the cos*t for, undergroq',liding the ursrhead utility an Hellman Avenue for th� length of :i the -Orojeci f N)ntage. Ort 6th Street,, the cost of unaergroundingf th! -overhead utility lines existing on both sides of thOl street shall he combined and the -in, lieu fee shall 4�yone-half the combined amount. 2. The access location on Sth Street, although undesirable from a traffic standpoint, is.'�a neces:;ity for this project at this time, and shall be constructed with Phase I of the project, because both 7th St,*eet and H�Ilman Avenue are subject to closur,�, due to flo.Giding. Uj)ork. th-a future ir-.3tallation of flood prote�tion measures ' for Hellman Avenue, the 6'&b Strget, access shall tT� removed and replaced with an emergency GrOvy access. The project access CC&Rs shall contain language to '�fnsurs that .1 4� 1 modification is accomplished at the homeownerls�expi�a�e at a futu,"e date when ,-squired by-thetCity. 3. An access location for the project shall be provided to Hellmatt Avenue. Ihe access shall te cons',tocted with-the initial phase of development, if ' tt can �e so de!�Igned to maintain a flood barrier along ,ellman, Avenue, N not, the project CC&Rs shal I contain languagc�- to imw� that this -,:cess is constructed at the-homeowner's expense at a fu --ire date (after flood protection measures,have been completed for Hellman Avenue) when required by the City. y r_ 5e ` °pLARiN N� @fi MIS �0 tI.) LIL •:, . T1 .111'0 6eruary 26;BG ~.• €�x 4 "F �, d i APPROVE Dj„AN�D A6O67E0 { I S 26TH 0AY OF•p �EBRUAR'Y,,,19F36r.: � l PLANNING C6NIft4ftSIOW OsF K'�TTY•, OF RANCHO' C,UC1 �ftGl BY: Dennis L. Stout, Ghatrm n tip x r ARi'ot r) Erstd Bu. ler•; Oeputy ecre,tarx <I, Brad Builer, Deputy S- cret0y of the tslann ag Corhmisti Atli, of Rancho Cur,2mohga, do heheby%erttfy that: the fol;ego r,14 so l t on wasr ur y, and regufariy introduce,ass ands, adopted by the Panrtang Gormniss6,on of the City of Rancho .ucer nt a�,,,at a rep, *,l meeting of the'Fgi pning ,Corftil s' �mr held. v on the 26th day of �F,�brt _rY 1996 by the follot ing, vole -to =pia • �, .' AYES; COMMISSI00ERSs` NOES_: COMMONERS: {t ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: y .. 1rl ,f �a e7 ti. a w {V � L A 4CN4 � •+g D E SAY V.� � � [y�`� i W O u ar rS 4n9h Nt�p im CU EY A U ` 6 6 D y�4U1L 6��q 00 V� Dap0 O'ad mod' AL N O!. .• L r dE Ja O. .n •-. EcOLT MVt) rY� d OGy 4 '6 .DING GE^ eW .O L b .:*y Y . ari T Y Cy Y uidC'D. dp U Yt may. yp Cy G aG } �C �dT OI.y O Y9 d +�EE N.OdA AoD YCp DO An 1 q'E.d�J:.DO^i VN:�� v�yJa ,q,:.i0 G44�YL 6qT � 4Ya.�t -Oy) LO 2 ° J] G d OC Ja �> O OTU L.. w" nrVN'G92 NLAI'�. E N �°oI races N� 9 dNL V vi.Ya+ 4N'^wYS C6p 6 QOAm LL 5 \O V 4 r 1+L 4L 4tJ d N ^ate t: A Eu o a a* S C Lt n� G 6 w O C N a R L" •C r -- 4 t C.!: Su.C�~ L V Y'� n J i= ^ y OL va �o • Q .�. a@) am. v V 6 t, taL Y d E n p N V Ng �H Y 2 a` : o W 2 M d Hw J N N nj f O r If 1V '^ L E«Ir c °M CY L n q > ?,^ Fy pG °RY�OV CY w LnG p O Q ,Z v� 1 �. '� d LV • a N gag S Z=- O q CC `O q G n« eE°N C6N a ti ♦♦ C d n Z1�0; N� Y° d' L w` n pdY pg`N LV .p L..O. GL tlµ O TG J y OLG - n✓F.��q�'Q VN9 ° N = =C. 41 V Ql mpNO °Z�.L L GV.L tl.Y Gy Yq V °Cn =.TOWN J.F E OL uL i +�L tT9 C� Wd dS]l D.,,, °aw. �^ O Q r' CGIw tl Y.0 i E NCO., yN t E ^A V..YL1 Sw.iaiL L C 3 �A 3y+�_L4 Cy M� �6Ny N . A e ,a�a.' mac.°_ z c o E. a'� 1.N 4t•u�w, iLZ °� r. c:n No a `DM '"'o QOpY q Da d �yi'f s '�YO G aQ Tw ^L 4 nC «: A A •- a u L. us-. Gd ^.D. YC ^.+p nN d: A w c �B. c =.YY C ^~A VGp 2 } d : ° d a tl. MN ° •- ...- o4�uc,N. Fc.4 �tw El a`.� Y at c9n Tod.,. tA;,.uE'o G 6O 60 S ^u N asi L SNN t TY ° @W1Sd� TnY. 6..d9 LGV QD44 02 q 1 wp G E« 6 6 Y L O N« L)J F w ei N. OCL iJ C N N d a+. 6 15-5.5 p -R a C cli 1 1. ^ NF Gy Y Y.w LpY y « NL Y q4 C G.L VO,C . a +uN. u° ° way i � F' t Da A w yF cO rnwn ^ n CYL h G! L tl N k' R.6 h'w w tL O ti O O O Y N C �s 2—!t n =.qne ^O QT -Z' = d A u 9 n Icy j p oG tlW1 i apG GS ...IG L.O. ANN 7 ^O d. � G do rqt 9G stlY Etl _� YAa uzAj comet ,'c,,.t.o cN N d++ $`5 t, coow c! Ntl. ctlay�� wwt wL 0 N 4G • Y GwC..ytl � tlG �.LiV EYV Otl 'SY y«q .o wh Gy V O.�M w w��N NO }. L'M G `. Ga .� V "L GCY 09 C O. [I ^tl �E[tlq V.Y tlR � tY ^O u OOAaTDi 6L� L� d L7.+GiCtl�p O� A G.�LL m ° :.ice L� ✓�.G OUd i GN 6Lp O, h.G NGA K.-Nfi i/I I..i DOO1.oV ^ ea, ` mtl^ ��V Y ��Rd AUp. YY °a �J° Ok2 64 N'DL OR.GLCB .GL � w .: .°.l .GL6N�L 6YgM O.�w. y..+Y MA�9 1�1MA Q.Ap ` t ci A , ° L ^ O1u o0 ow.euiDi'°° cr— a. N _ ptb . 9x 'T r O LQ ab q EL y t6 L G-0 wtUaG N Y U10 p qO OI ^amrb G 'L LarT �ppL \ y/ b Oy�4. ^ Ap OO9V C a06� _ Tr� ,• L U^ N O k_ �` O h w-0 g 4 U O p Ors 6 N N }. ^ i i �� AE r � OC .. ar p N, L b� ^° Y:mO U,DND °G'O n66U A by -0O Orp.A �� y Lw pb yT 122-.1- N b • N 1 M:.. p r YL GV O.n6b.ac A C A ^q b �diT 41 «bEN Y q �Or p N �+ 4Yb Vwd ly `.. q61 b NO. an 6N 00'r'NO OA^ -0S^ c 'Nl+y.- i .s O OI O'L UK ^^ 6 6L InNy GLN J3 w p q� yN no G uR aa°. `cn CL i zp p O' R. R i b N Cd o G 16 E O bE w c p (t OIOG L 1lr Nn�c qM 6$ °Lail ^Ly. RU d L' i �Stla a b O� NO dp q° L L c alY ° 1 17A° W..bM Fp0 6N pip 3,p EA C1 uym "� O F A ° a°1 T.N gaap albo Via+„°, ^n I5@ 1.t U 1 1 °IL G' •y°,y. G�J y y. Gl � °. �t°C�N, 9a1 �r'�? al L ° r tl i1 ° n N a ° �� � (O.. •-. Y °� a u -0 y p O b L d r V� a '.�. �^ na• �p LLN.L cy 6�G Lb X- _5 -0 OL 'VTG 6cc Oq'GC GD AP6MM \ 6wri @d yr. u «� OI tw.^ C 9 €� C oGb b Oval. SN HMr 6N Ofi NqO 4W�06 6. Y YL.I rM SN gx O �`Ya NY ^O a an °q qC. C.og ^Lill Aal. O H T L «N -0Gq Dam' _a c wNC .c O Np n^ .4°i 2CNOLG 4-0 p,^ O aye ^w Ond � N oi[ �y.dw UW aq4• N2 {++� 5. _ bpmG ba o. LAanm. ' t° YY�tia G Y p rq at m. OD u�q r°Oly L ° G<L ^Gar Y' O L^N'r V Y N° L ° O c M 4 « n a + ye an'° Qoc cp« o. N.A¢ ? r _ C p N s ^T N u is al o pwL °a �Ip3 bob °opy v « -0 u EaVlb a .•°i n- +r+',04.d p` c0 �y y a LANy ._ Ya � y0 Lapp Ep .d" p yC ¢c Y G aO.CO Cp CC GOC C W X No L pgyR N. V g0.b tn+9 r CLU OIL �P. U pOp ^V: w. n OI ^R O L r L y? ° p p o.-,. L O V . L c • d, O L .... O c G a x b n p O aN r_u a O N t>u A wa U ^Lp io u" tin b � r. 400�F 6h Da W66 ✓Na°.y: - n u. 01 dG a n „ ° &fib S -g qb �^ a `L 4 w J K d L N. er ov Lvc r 4 Y G N 4 !. Y YY2T� pGLq}Yi YC� w B Y ° •_ N •yy °Tr O� O a -nr. � V n9 C ,v •nu ,Y R Yon p Y 4y�ll F ^q0 G °� 'aydu it M.NIrw C' 6 �VH R.i.�+ T a1 YCq^ � o r�Y qua a.a YO m� a v. 38 a~ >♦ Y coauu Gl�ji4 Sc. L Q6. bM y u` g 4pY� Ou'OP O O7�q.Cr Y L^ J s f ,Y R L .62 9.; YV.M - VZE all °Lp ° YOM^ ry Ona O X '79 ati. O aYCCL. G06 Gv CA.:1 ENV a td1R F� i �W yN J9 z yio.� �y q�a }`� C- fu..'U. C ° GAY. w. tO pN L 0,0.4 O „y L 6Jq,L �t1YTE 9 raq `M ytY- ?,J N.TG Cs n\°, wM� � a q M v 6 q ea v � Y'A �c u ro „c. °rui O, �L N..+ g-..5 EE O, E a iL ..vim Y ,,++ qY .•..0 r+ rY nG �.G a.,. y` � � t o��� _L O l tl Y W W W E 7 t &v-. { rj f 1 Ist{ L Y Y..Op a a1 t ,a �,d N O O ;q 1' OIQ ,� 10.bY a �• t b a �. 95Ni .VOr LV� E 1 � ri � •�� CAVp CO =Y t�9pµG� V T� N L R hya R O 1f M 4ii �`.. a O V Z5= Q VC�1 L L y1pS hCp 1p.. QO- .;:•�V A L VIA Y�..1 4 LVL «. 4�Y. V Q 6 � �9A Amp ..a }IILUyo LN_q ° a. u'Y c � 4 r.¢g' C N6 •'f7 d O �O n I.. ^1`p A i $ C!• +S3 H. O V Y tit aI tl t �^i. ,♦pnY V40�Q¢Nb Jt O Vb b q � t9 ♦I16 yY� p2 +I u ��C 9 C4bV 4 ♦ w41w $Y��,. 9�. 4 � ����.' �LO. VN C. aav it �. AF ` at0. p tiNa�U pQ Y� N ♦+�.. COI i V ppVL OYOh .• Cr HN 64 V.8.Y ° ,- Ec L.. i ORCm. aY••T OV dye din :LC t� V °w. 3 o,� !!U 0.'pL as •a n a..�.ti'. S'.°.. 1 * Sq ¢« a° °° u « n �:. ' �C.VO V W Y. TV .O V O. = r -4T D.OV .CC qV�Y L04 -q O w.0 +r. PA Y _t AM C~ V� v F VV,A .. p 2 qz �. Y as x "' c3 'LAm +°8.2 .cc P V �♦ -,'r 24, . °C L Y y q Pi Mh 01 O VV♦yC L, CO.Oq M. �OL pO OAT: V M .tom ��•A+ �l '� c; i?4 C VO, a O. it ,Y V •C N.. it <°. v ra.� ^Ti . -'^ p , « p. T• 00 V E RN Lt 0 L^ .. O ` ff �,ac a a "an+ 'T Yp «u U Qum 1 ° a �. a1 � a>•p s� w. �lV L.0 a g >R¢.y. .1 w.` ke 3UC3 _ ?4 • rE, G b � y 6ty E et, VMQaT ¢¢ Y f ^^ b t>•p, cP A 2.5 U L. ^_ �.. _ v Q n NC >1! �Y4L w00w afitvo �•4'n0 L S C a: CY iM '3. M om r'eay VI$Y2 �.. u s.e ♦.t p�p CJ 6L ..Y CC � Y >♦o emu=. �p O:� ER ` L t CV4 bi Olu +•♦'.p JCy a1�'h ACS G h •O ° O a t a -,z O v a w OI p Y V tY tv C �~ lY 4<.1 �. 0. L C Fib 6.Y a!w d.0 'K aIV Y O: fC A a. ti aus A L yc �q 4� _ R IF F y 72 •� Nap a ,� _ �fineO E Oy No f q c c r. 7 L ytl� Y ZZ 2v NG.._. >Y. /NCE WO y� p OST K9u r 9 O.'S 9a 1E p. n'W qY a ii� Qi C^a C«Q OL G60L G DG rt C[l t VL y n Y9 i i C a C 0. pm�/ G 1 O Y°...1 y «i. O�q q°QY N/ =1 G r CM vp .3.T k LugN Cu L�r```/� °LV..C° 795.— KQ n }? L V V ` ai E O L �.�L L Wnp. � iif .C' Y° ,2E�.. BG@2M0.V NE .a °"_ CL i iii CU, ,z. LqL G.-.ro La a. °ia EE F�i°t.. p E gL 4y �uYi paq� o� 9._ Eapii L H- O._uu.L 6,2 "�ti Y'G. yin uuaY.o.0 NG LTS t' �E° gvbC Ci O y C y Y 1W O q N y L y 6M N lC »Y YV G a� N L y y u..� ° N O 4 ni.rA� Girw NOa+N -Viv 64�� i ° tY M S`u V a O y, C. O w U m ,Y 0. V O q.Eo � yL W1 ciuj. C N a ° O Y� vLL' ZY« E� Ot N:J oJO Sy a� x v Td.. Lr ° c y N E o6 E er d.L A f ay i b. u � qnG u ya m I � w !3' fiy ,- �- �c.��•�� .-, ;� rGR 'Yer }gpo¢\:`^wrr?;� f •�\VCJ Y t y c.S j t' � O y ( c d o a p c T N y p v u .22 q° m G 44 V yC4 to p •17 L.! Y .L OL L p0 N Oy Y .. t0 > O a OI et O L^ E n N L q nw °1 ^ L q C U r qzN uL dU L� v as ml p=' fF GN`7\ rC°•�.`4•C. ». G�`N G�.N LL ?. Qa. 1-•4i nJ. Cpid i a u C d 1 e y w � a •., .� c m Y 6 q E m?. Y L.gwi. O z U t Y+ Y a� A C L• o Oy d Y.� d t4 Y° C 6d q V�1 q.. L dd d � Fd0 CcU nq 'da w .d n _W N � L a Cyt r a+ L I b mn y.9 i'•' L c T a C L O� a0 W COL N d W a s y L 2 d�A.r0 d Nq 9FTL C � z r ya c u •OO o o,� a o w.g. >9 mo q� L W ml °od b dq Hv d ap aw r^� Cm+ w oNi= 4RN SO rr IN ib'. jyh CITY OF RANCH 0 CUC&,MOI IGA Gucn yo' STAFF ZtEII, PRT � ��r a a 1 DATE: February 26, 1966 jQn TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comriission frRUei: grad Buller, City Planner I BY: r "-'vmrd Fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT:,. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13203 - ROBERTSON HUMES - A residential development consisting of condominum units, on 10:3 acres of land „ >in. the Medium -High Residential- D�,strict (14 -24 du/ac), located on the north side of Arrow Route adjacent to the east Side of ',. Deer Creek Channel - AP': 208- 341 -132, I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Regc ed• Approval of a subdivision, site plan, -5—sign, arch 1tectura' and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surroundin ,Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Medium High Residential South - Approved condominium project (Tentative Tract 12525) Low Medium Residential East - Approved apartment complex, Lincoln Rancho, Medium- high Residential West - Approved condominium project (Tentative Tract 12040), Medium Residential. C. General Plan Designations: _ Project Site - Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) North - Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) South - Medip,n Residential (4 -14 du 'ac) East - Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) West - Medium Residertial (4 -14 du /ac) D. Site Characteristics. Project site has a triangular lot configuration that generally slopes north to south at a 4% grade. Project site fronts along Arrow Route and is bordered' by Deer Creek Channel tz the west and by Lincoln Properties (apartment complexes) to the east. There are no significant historical or cultural values related to this site. Presently, an existing trucking service operates on this site.. All existing structures are slated for removal, r. ... ITEM D PLANNING (iOMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' Tentatiivel'Tract 13203 r F February 26, 1986 a Pao- #2 - II.. ANALYSIS• _ A. General: Proposed development will comprise 224 ca :idominium t: units within an internal Loop system, with tht' exception of three (3) buildings, located at the extreme northern portion of the project site (see Exhibit "B "),. Major features of the site; plan include building orientation to the centralized :open space urea, strong pedestrian, linkages, and recreational amenities (i.e. two tennis courts, two swimming pools; tot lots, and large size recreational buildings). Proposed project will be serviced by a reciprocal driveway entry with the Lincoln Rancho project to the east (See Exhibit 9-1 "), and also a reciprocal entry approximately 550 feet north along the east property line (see Exhibit "B "). All parking will be located adjacent to the Loop Road system with 224 carports, 158. uncovered parking stalls, and 56 guests parking stalls, for a total of 438 parking stalls. c B. Design Review Committees, The Committee reviewed the architecture of the proposid two and th -ee -story buildings and -ecommendee, enlarging the'.windows at the end elevations of Buildings B and C for consiitency; and revising fenc'ng details It �) of recreation, areas- and ,carport end elevations to reflect dominant architectural eler.lents of the proposed buildings (i.e.," stucco and wrought iron). In. addition, the Committee recommended provisions for a buffer landscape treatment along Arrow Route, including 3 foot low profile wall in front of the parking stalls with mounding and shrubs. Lastly, the Coriapittee recommended raised planters /benches and potting of plants' G within concrete court areas of the buildings (Exhibit "G "). The applicant made the recommended changes to the development plans; however,, he failed to address relocating trash enclosures at the north end of the project site for better distribution and providing additional details for a directory sign. Both t... mittee concerns are incorporated as Conditions of Approval (see attached Resolution Condition Vs 4, 12). -' C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee recommended approval subject to the following: Conducting a fireflow test, and a knox box on the recreational building and all gates to the project. The Committee also required all three -story buildings to have _ fire alarms'- installed. A detailed lighting plan was recommended to provide good lighting throughout the site for site security purposes. The Committee recommended treat the applicant be required to pay' an in lieu fee equivalent to one -half of the established cost of undergrounding the street frontage, which will be reimbursed` to the developer currently undergrounding the 12 kv and telecommunication line on the opposing side of Arrow Route. _iF° va <M s y Fl PLANNING COISSiiION�,, FF REPORT FAbruary 2 x198`6„ ii`age D. Environmental Assessment: part I of; the Initial 4tudy"Was been completed by ttse Applicant. Staff has completed Part Iif the' Environmental G(iecklast and has found that. theslte�issubjeet. to notise eve ll . in excess,. of 65Le. ,, A pr61-- n, y" ";ng ;- 1 analysis` has been performed, -to determine. compliance With titer City of `tancho *among44s exterior standards -Qf 65Ld t, lie a . � study indicates' that becausi of 'the distance 1b,VdUgd, feet), tale CNEt. wsll be reduced tci 'Less tha pat!a n 55L�d ° ";at a�4l�. and balcony, spaces within the project which complies wzh "• wife City's standard: ,; To adc i.tione, tf±e requ��r4d lax, pe canopy tes. (24" box, 30 feet on •cen"ter), al:ona prqject f�,ontage` ill provide fv.r�ther .exterior noise miti§&f*on A,; final, noise analysis will be completed as pars. of. the final building plan n check to ensure compTlance with the Crity and ;State {iterior, noise level of 45 dba. This study willlbe.como eted as'part.c, ' the final,, building plan check. A dopy of Part II of the Fnvironme_ :tal Checklist is attached for your' review and consideration, If the Commission concurs with these firdings, issuance of a Negative DeclO,irat on would be in order. IT,I. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Find;.gs_ listed on the attacheiti ResQlution are supported by the following facts: 1. The project site is adequate in` size and shape to accommodate develt)pment, and the •proposed residential uses are in accord with the objectives of the plan and the Development Code. 2. The proposed site plan, in .conjunction with the. Conditions of Approval, the are consistent With current' [4 development standards and regulations�of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper as well ias posting of a large notification sign on project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: I',: is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and receive all: public input on this project... If after such consideration, the,Commisson can support the Facts for Findings and Conditions of Approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. AML �r � • sw °'�° c�:°"se � 8 ° °� r i aim — -,'S—r µ � 1 ■ rER'RA VIS'A' IF PLAR ��turo City Hall muse Now S ; ■ b � , p_ ■ • F, (.. �•• ■q +tea ■��w P.mae� ■�■ ■■ kt yy9■■���■s�I t It f. A: fro S �•' 1} :.: :, .� .■ L..r.` --t-1 -- _ •Y F { .L. -fie, ■�' � �a� =g 1 s� .a - rJ,.. _ e i Mill it ' `= I � ► � ! _1 iii _ N w� '' I (•Ili .� t a.. I� r� y ' a i egG t/uir d/ /X _ risll Q94 99a 441 11 I'l .. �..rn..w � -his � � i � � F— • i- f cwmrrrw a, d__,ix 't a p 1 i 1 V41 Z, Or' � �.j -. � /—'d \y„Gt�,rviier� RANCHO CLTCAMO \TCrt TITLE= t T� PLANNING DIVISIOa\I EXHIBIT. X13 ---- -- SCALE: a CJ r i N W CL 'a3H ca aims 4. .. a. to o u. � ,rd RROlU +��617r� 2 { 1 Fa > Z o t Q z O cr .l1 r., FRONT & REAR BUILDIM3 A — THREE STORY END ELEVATION ` �y lot r1�.1N.lwr • + [ (- Yg11.ti •WU�iai m. wn„y/Y � r` M a, s5f 1'1 aw FRONT do REAR BUILDING C — THREE STORY ELEVATION PARKING LOT ELEVATION - - END pale t TYPICAL &ECTIDr, LANDSCAPE ?.n!yRTIDN CITY OF RANCI-1Q CLCA ITM: °y�� "-T ., t3 PLANNING DIVISI a ���fTITIE: �G6tI9� �tl� s rS EXHIBIT- - ' -- _ SCALE: lu C. R PLANNING DIVISIO,-q EXHIBrr- -_SCALE. r VM FENCE oESG%l fig.. .. • j� FIRST FLOCq WARWELL PLAN IWM 57ARWELL PUN BUILDING TYPE A FW- $TAI nLL P.AN F CITY OI t� t�� f ITCtt I• RhXC O CUCA.MONGi1 TITLE. e. ..:! °t1'sNNI \G DIVISIOIN � ; tit fry �•,Ww S« t r VM FENCE oESG%l fig.. .. • j� FIRST FLOCq WARWELL PLAN IWM 57ARWELL PUN BUILDING TYPE A FW- $TAI nLL P.AN F CITY OI t� t�� f ITCtt I• RhXC O CUCA.MONGi1 TITLE. e. ..:! °t1'sNNI \G DIVISIOIN � ; r R • ; , •cucAMcNGa CITY OF RANcxo t FART II - INITIAL STI=t` " ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST } DATE•���� APPLICANT: :lOt � �+/el Jral c. PILING D'tE: lJ.�/ er'J L:G NLfijBER:.!� ` PROJECT.; t�/i3G.tf7iy�li.�ColemryT ,224e, �Zsr 7 ROJECT L�CATIO.I: I. EWIRONMENTAL I:3PAC,TS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" .,nswers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE ; , Yo Z. Soils and Geolozv. Will the proposal have significant results in: ' a- Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. 'Disruptiorcl displacements, compaction or • burial of the soil? l c. ,Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? i d. The destruction, covering or modification Of any unique geologic or physical features? e• Any Potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g= Exposure of people or property to _geologic hazards such as earthgteakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or'similar hazards? • h. An increase in the ta.e of extraction and %oL use of any mineral r ;source ?, % _ 2. H94rologY. Will "he propkaaal $zve significant :~ results in: :- r, mar A ` Pa " ge YES u4YBE' Sp y a. Changes in cerrents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? 1 r Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, v+ -� G -'=he rats and amount of surface water runoff? - t. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? �. Change in the amount of body of water surface water in any y-': e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of t/ surface water quality? `,. f- Alteration of P roundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of grourdwalters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through Interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? / h. The reduction in the amount of water other- ✓ wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as ,flooding or seiches? 3. _Air,t�ualgty. Will the proposal have significant results in: ? ? a. Constant or periodic air emissions s-om mobile or indirect, sources? _ Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attainment cf applicable i air quality standazds: - c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? f k. Biota E'iora. 13ill the proposal, have results i t a. Change in the characteristics of species, inclu4,g, diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? ,t 1� b. :eduction of the numbers of any unique, -rare or end --ngered species of plants? naze F YES !L&YBE -N0 c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of Plants into as area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant results Change �l a. in the characteristics of species, `+ including diversity, distribution, or, numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any uiligr_e, yore or endangered species of animals? ' c. Taioduction of new or disruptive'species of �. animals into an area, or result in a barrier `y to the migration or movement of animals? A. Deterioratian or removal of existing fish or ? wildlife habitat? 5. Ponulatiron. Will the proposal have significant -_ results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? , b. Will the proposal affect existing laousing, or tG create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Pconom%^ Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: "\ ' a. Change in local or regional sacio- economic characteristics, including economc'or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among Project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users! 7. Land Use and planning Considerations. Will the proposal have significant ; Cesults in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? • b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental' entities? a, An •impact upon the qulai.ty or quant'ty of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities ?. q a ` p rte- YES M&YBE tdQ 'rransoorr- rYon. :Will the __ proposal have significant results it-' a. General -on or substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing ;streets, or demand for new street donst,�uction? - c. Effects on existiug"'p w ,;;: "z *ies, or demand t'br new parking? ' d• Substantial impact upon existing tran"sporta- tion systems? l e, Alterations to j�resent patterns of circula. lion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential, water- borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9� Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in:. a.: A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, Paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. Health, Safetv and Ni3 ^'Factors. Will the propcs3l have significant results in`: a. Creation of any health hazard or'potential health hazard? / i b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous suostances in the, event of an accident ?' d.. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous f noise levels? S• The creation of objectionable odors? ' lh. 'An increase in light or glare? "' �' Page YES MAYBE NO 11. Aesthetic. Will the pro ;oral have significantf' results in: ✓; « ; �. �• TGe obstrue"jon or degradation of any scenic or viec,i? f o• Tho? teatihn of an aesthetically offensive sit`t�3 c. ,.,_ conflict with the objective of designs ed (tr potential scenic corridors? a / Y 12. >iMes and Public Services. Will <the S havT proposal have a significant need £or new systems, or a1"terations the to following: 9 a Electric c power. , b. Natural or packaged gas? C. Communications systems? a. WaLec supply? e- Waftewater facilities? / r ,t f. Flold control stiOuctures? Afth g- Solid waste facilities? �j Fire protection? I °� i- Police protection? i l ./ _ J. Schools? k. Pl)rks or other recreational facilities? - Maintenance of public facilities, includ;ng roads an3 flood control fa- ilities? m. Other governmental services ?, 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have sigr1ifacant results in; a. Use of substantial, or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantia:. increase in demand upon existing • sources of'energy? C- An in- -,ease in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d.` An increase or perpetuation of the consumption Of non- renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? Page fl YES MAYBE NQ, e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or k scarce natural resource? 14. Mandatory Findinss z of Sigzificanca. a, Does the Projatt have the potential to degrade 4 the quality of the environment, substantial: reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife Population to drop, below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant ar animal community, rr.Muce the number, or restrict,-,h e range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate € important examples of r,ie major periods of California history or t'�tehistory? b. Does the project have tho4Potential to achieve z' short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, E environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the ' environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, def;`nitive period of time while long- r term impacts will endure well into the future) c. Does the project have impacts w?,ich are individually limited, but c miilatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable , means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed In connection with the effects of past projects, / and probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which, will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly ?, r II. DISCUSSION OF rxn "DD�i _.. EVALUATION Ci-e., Of affirmative answers to the above questions plus, a discussion of gropased mitigation measures?. ;2,l,,j ?.frort�r �.e;oy4».reG �u,tG r��.s�f -9s� �/1� �rr�ra,✓� z+,t' l+�r��rtia+rS sae�.�rS, ':ra y, L" anv� .garrma,vsaL Surt'�+cC .Vt4.4_SpEe7x of?.,e.Pra,Qd WIZZ ac 'zoobea t#a zw704 "41 0--e •ee4 Ci ?/v j+3'aER, Ji@.Oinra? & WrGL .�rc� -ash 7-0 V&-- 5j-�cxJosVar� ,�iiers .avh �anlvEyEa �'d� vEE2 G�� CJlflerr,�r�t -, i i 1010 f 'a�-Ee7' �vrLL BE Slei{yEeY 'Ira _ R�Grnr.6 -.s�ey vr�orse 9v.9Lrfs.s �t rcYBolsxo.�T A,Pat� ,�ixe7�r f�stJ�.s!E2 W'Zt- joi�v9G prs� / �_aL UJsLp'- nit ihrr -A& g 41z"re s .+ ,A S ��- Qjireed Yd I'�Toe y TO ra1%A. e�iFr's 2E 2� AO-144 r�rs�/y;,ryy�� vrit�q�CTsc,+l Fr,'CASa�s GJSF C�rIF.�F iCfL��Q r`w $u�Ldr�+'f (.'cN/sT,�ccTirry S.^a�� �I.ECv»t�1�✓�S iA ,� �u �� w -• ,� H si rrvc�EAS6S ArtE nra tee. ?s/,ow - A �y Te r� , a +ea�5a_ ! _ .w . �a ' �° III. •DETE,.�� \j0`� ," � � On the sips of this Aitial eva eraiio °n; = �tI find the£ rooms L ..S P ed pr6jeec CbU7 v OT : a,�e aF" sa nificant =eE ect on the a�v� ronasent and .a 'r� G:n u:'E D$RLA1 IQ'V will be gregared. I r, fr3nd th�t g 4xhc •pro a ed W -, t h Pra7ect: could have a significant K of, act on "tfie enyironmene, ,thee will. no`t be ;a sign ,licanz ✓r eot in ;this ase because - °e mit s irj�on measures,descr beci,on' ai a,tx�ached s et h`Mje -b+een added to the prda'eec. A =:IEGATIV ' DSCL.lRATZOTJ WILTBFE EREPARED,. j""� Z find the praposedwproject XXY have 'a signs leant efrec; or, she 1 I envt2iiment, and an ,E;islRQ v?L� iS,;i:iPACT :1tE OR. j P j .. Date —rdw�R k✓ b S�gnatu e — Ticle Aj A j "A ... USOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE e LOM N IN r. COMMISSION OF THE�­� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAi, PPROVING CALI' ORNIA CONDITIONALLI DESIGN REVIE14,14D4ENTATIVE TRAcr MAP NO.� 13nq A WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map Nd. 13203 (for condominium ppr,.poses) hereinafter "Map,4 sub6ttted­,by.,.�, Ga'ry M I -,, fo the, pu o , of azur,. applicUt rp subdividing the real property;s, gated in the City of Ra ' Ilk C -Wonga,"Cdunty nchy uc of San Bernardino," StA-d-�6f,tall-f6rn described as-,a residential, sub'#i-ifsAon Consisting of 2�% condat'a-inluni units "on 10.3 acres of land ocated, on the north side of Arrow Route, adjacent to the east side of Deer; iCre'ek ' Channel, regularly came before tffo� 01an ing COmmissipn for public hearing and, acti-on on February 26 J. 1986,, and WHEREAS, the Gity Kanner has recommended approval of the Mao'subject to all conditions set forth In, the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; an-4, 7- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered�,the Engireering and Planning Division's reports and has considered- other evi�fence presented at the public'hearing, NOW, THEREFORE,_ the Planning Commission of the City of K�ncho. Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1- The Planning Commisslon makes the following findings in -Tentative regard td Tract No. 13203 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and spec.ific plans; X (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, V and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife.or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not 'likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired, by the public at large, now of record, for acce;i through or use of the property within the proposed subdiviiion. 12 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION _ Page #2 r (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. s SECTION 2: Tentative -, Tract Hap No. 13203, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: besign Review: 1. Applicant sk,01 submit material sample board to City Planner for review an&�,approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Applicant landscape and hardscape inner courtyard ` details to Planner fur review and approval prior to issuanci�,of betiding permits. 3. Applicant sha;j'( 'submit all fence details to City Planner for review and aof/ -oval prior to issuance of building permits. Provide decorati�e block wall along beer Creek Channel to the satisfaction of Gity Planner. 4. Applicant shall provide a screened trash enclosure for units 9 and 10. 5. Applicant shall provide a 10 foot wide texturixed pedestrian i connection to ne�^thern open space area. 6. shah Developer p :provide a combination of berming, landscaping and a 3 foot low profile wall" along Arrw Route adjacent to parking stalls for screening. ` 7. Applicant shall provide one 15 gallon tree every 20 feet on center and landscaping (shrubs and groundcover) along the entire west property line. 8. Developer shall provide special landscaped statement at main entry, subject to review? L; =City Planner prior to issuance of p : building permits, 9. Developer shall submit a detailed lighting plan to include both high and low level lighting for review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 10. Developer shall relocate trash enclosures at the southwest corner of project site for better site distance. 11. Developer shall submit sign permit application and details of project directory sign and other monument signs to the City Planner for review and approval, prior to issuance of building " permits.. tj 'r:'mmrli,,R";t7rarry� F ±,r.,. :,"�ppssR qs;v- PLANN, I`fiG COMI"SSTON' RESL ``j�FON Page.3 * vV 12. All pedestr an linkages ;ENO centralized open space shall be -" delineated�.ty accent trees and shrubs. , 13. Shade cover (i: -e. trellis) shall be provided over all trash^ enclosures. 14. Prior to issuance of building permits a final noise study shalt y be submitted which discusses the 1evO of interior SL 'e attenuation, the b6l4in, Aj� aerials and constructibri, �chnt'ques used io achieve a maxii�ain interior noise IevOl of 45 dba:,- Tract: 1. Developer shall install all street improvements along Arrow .• Route �rontage 15 ludirig to the bridge on Flood Control property. \1 ¢ 2. The applicant shall pay, prior to recordation, a fee in -lieu of undergrounding overhead 12kv and telecomriunicatiomc ' ines along Arrow Route. Said fee shall be one -half of the front foot cost of undergrounding,� 'established by City Council for a distance of 457 feet. ' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF FEBRUf,RY, 1986. ' PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI+I Gi BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST - Era , Bu ier, Deputy ecretil)y i; I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of'the City �F ' Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plan ping Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Olann�lg Commission held on the 26th day of February, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i� i- ... .. 'A�..... a ...._. .. .., .. i •z`oLte YY D' r q O ILI Y u t`YO_u4 o° �S1 L'�.Y LteM�uOi'. w ti. o • oqi xc a tl` N Lao. 0Y a r� U Yq Qj Yt YocO:S l.... CL x ml' 9 N Y+-O� 6L O B3i N i •z`oLte YY D' r q O ad u+• a y -E ' "d °.w. :f S l- '" o �yr jS3 .roc a Y ENO Tw Y tl VY �,p Y Y6w.° M Y CCUV� YVYC O1 Y�AYp E +'9 m. N.Y.. °�•�.rt �iYU O rocaw C.V� 6 +N•�YE 40i°C® :G O.L.4tl 4 m ILI tl` N Lao. 0Y a r� VG,. Yq nV a.Y Yt YocO:S l.... -.n 'Z C 2d N Rr yq. L q- V ^y " .0.1. .O "mwu-� a � s aC� :5 4 s. YpG coo° 4 NLL' Sii n "7Z Ir Yn vx- u"2-.E 99 _ea 0�V V nQ ° a�jC,. i c�c <' N cry � �.�°_va'°••w• p•' 0 g F axdi'Y"� °. � u n� nN NY° u ^tn•ad xt ate$ YNL. "a" .+v tl yi+Y' Y.- A ad u+• a y -E ' "d °.w. :f S l- '" o �yr jS3 .roc a Y ENO Tw Y tl VY �,p Y Y6w.° M Y CCUV� YVYC O1 Y�AYp E +'9 m. N.Y.. °�•�.rt �iYU O rocaw C.V� 6 +N•�YE 40i°C® :G O.L.4tl 4 m ILI 1• V w p 6 -77 T C -.n 'Z C 2d N � wTOL '� u0. tlNNy Y ^Y Q..L .0.1. .O a � fc.10 fi' Y �q EL t p vx- u"2-.E 99 _ea N � � �.�°_va'°••w• p•' 0 g F axdi'Y"� °. � "fie • S'a'a o. a° d ra a NA h.YC .°.� ' o I �. 7 I i e �o,nca b�.•� oq6^ � OfO�yp n°. E i o a L LL L �aN 0 YLga L ,E, O y gNEY u µw. dy w.a �pw goN1a p}OL W p •r. t '" a u Y Y a r vT . 9UOCN 'TpgH bai d.�Y.'E G p Yom= Y N «A0 qEE°.pL O'C NSUSN .°. Nay w 4W Nr � O Y.L 4 N Ay O ^^ N O `.Yi Y N f CA Od +�.bi ,.- Y. S � M Y g L •rc l'fi.++L6 6NY V� Vi •+N N.L$f C .-YAv 61C Yy ° LEyO. C 4 w a 5 ry w e. kg ^•ONLY row... Y(,j a�'�.•LY AS° L asap. v o � � M� w.N Sv ENO yL ' 1 w °p °avA Yw w- °YL biu° L =. y0 •M C.b _ 9 G5T Nq EN O is ttY TpG _ L L y N.. u q 2 bz N,O Yom. Aq y�r 21 Lb ^ O#= .A+9 >•"n Q v AFZ >jcv N=Z 83 ° p v 'ra v_' CTp V > j =20• CI. }«N N Y d N ;MlO�OCL CC..fi. W tY Lw n„p. I N n LN T�LN v 6N' YC dI90o a mMq ��A 8 �a O • _1=q AO Lnn _ L C qW= p6p:0'O a OUr• °► °OY l�bmL YQ^ Y C 5 N^ G C ^ M A �O rj =:C d^ °d OV 3NF WOU gN.Gn �.N _ ro rrq « >bc io4 L.`uv arc L� N �.GO H•°r ropON)'y0a °r° «O b Ly YV =�L `Ow rrrc �aVf E LVO„Z �LA a=.N O° Yu qu L.r.`9. C q >O 4b I Ytf 7 :q < ,°a 6L ° ~ N. 6 h^ r h O n <° S w ^ V L a• T 6 t) q �tMV 6da0 �. O1 Iz y •J Y C= O Y Ar�- 0L x G i 6N.pp ^ m ^p � a• N GyVCCb 72 R O C p w� r N Y. q C CC O •J a° N i V Y:^ C lag a+O1.6C �4C yLN� 4 CqCy � Otyj 4ll�Wb� aln °p.pu ¢. m wgr.q C cs biL q. 4 a °c a c4 0 �qe:u u v N ej T- A v °uN�OL O�O> +. NM.Y N.Ci. f•�. q°QA6 H of o -ao Y��u'Aa... _I: S c e�Vu. F �( ^•+a. OD.. ^ 'C V I YL ?V L YY r ! 6 >O E }. pq t 6Vd 9 C Yom° L CV^YR .Vac °.. go g�4 All, ° N Y q^ C m m a u c �'✓ i b v° u L� I Y cY $... s �•� � u ao o+ fitly A9 ° y M9 Y O V y aO Y Ny CO w�6 U R. '-4K q 4Y Cw • y by MV L M� L cLL +DN � �! 'O . pp T e'IV y1 ^q. U CYy`• V AVN V OO R^ L. Oat C + �y U C "� a U_ tl YRrR °OV Y V wry ^ OVU6 rtpl e N Va �2 `I qy aNd„ cu L QI4 =V NbK nO nNG pL V.- OD Diu �, L• ,,•T.ac o�'y a ...NC oV a i�^�ui u.N u w cw � ai RX II �, ¢ ca. us. .. o ov.Hp a°• ctls Y;o r. s L.°.�01. C- �. G� L✓ C N b1 L A Y .° S� O N O Sr pY �. V V - .q L a m e e'g'o ubo s.. H ° `q aut NM ^q M Y as� • G y.�� «..0�'. C� ,M rig �O LUM YtY.gOUnGM': b VSy. NV dq�. I {jp5 EVL° �® V� xN O�w t 4 Gq n'QC�L ^°qC OMN °O. yS� ytl 4u p Y. �%� I - �(_yI�• �y O PFPF NY <° •+il "� +.OG Oyw a1 �.uwM Lq L 16C =. e 50.,E �L q.CYb• 6`U 6 O iR Y CwYtl6 tl n._a 1♦ OGr- H y 5{L� ..p4n rt.' -V tlp rtN LOa Y.0 D,� HG V cpCO« .W "3' yNL CE iG V wa'6 04�L0 ONn -:.g al �N aLiV VY a g G .-. °pp oua —i Q I['•tl- 4N SNC. /=�.Z <N Vr-.. waaiw n0 <A� �: 6u XQWLpiM II R._ L i1� ^m t a1 a �M� 6 o Opp =R VSyC 4 Z=_. L L ee O. 99 _. a 2 LY .✓aa O Nq. C.= O ,a L:v �.� mp �. 0° Cw '•. a >ae u H e o': vs. n v Lv L _a - c an•.°o artNl �r tl2o ,cv nao son w 6 :'l O• d c C C Y rt !"z Y y O^ p r9 N.L g� yyV iO 2q]j rt yz HO N a.V Siw• by Cyw° NC L 4.a r VT °� Elm •µY. �� 9r V F O ^ a.L j .) r•+tY.✓y i 6 O,✓ 9 .d fi ~R 6 ^V A. j:= `Yq Y rtC° 'C °C MY ARCN s_.04EL LuM1.s S >n% N�HNq 6` OqG q. -�.. ^Q O� y0 by�V yCT�'••O tlV.m C , H O OC O 04 r< NT CY L L • Vr� O�Y-^ ClO G✓a rt0 a nC LO:� O. �2 1) V° \^ •-.L6 ywpn V g U L E oA °n.,.r` • QuO QaW t1 Q9M IY.ON <tl QO f- 011e 4an tl L WG:—N aO+2 777 �F Yea o4 ¢° cnc, ev.-° mQ E� =27g _Y �• � 4.yf! tAln O � V �� WS U+E-. )c li Uc - � Tj E � O G. U� .�, GY .. LZ ¢ m SY.G. a^ `y CK EQ L.LV C.R O a� ` 14u CUgE rn m .. NFL O� pQ�E Jy jg— Y HN =COO 9y bn LL.ryEI GC.. ,¢ Gp hOM G �L (.1 Yq wo �°- � Q. Q O xVa �CLYG� Oyjq, ��-. myo yrs � U .O O 'c O,a,,. tL p U U 9 C Y J ✓7 w� CS `.YY y '. .ea¢I_ 9 c c`O UY U. 'fait Y a T C O N l N Y 9 p ^Em 0 p C\0r, ..J =G6 OC p W CIM le S L OC Nµ0 V O L P On AOn0 er a S E. a A t t3u� t �� L L,w ++ c Y w Aft r t¢am n•dr'. p rca �... aL�o.'o W.n a.^md.c yr h airs r n =� =-A M N T U D C 6 N y G Y C' c - _ L t E Nu F O� OY A. O Oa O Y:p O J. c 9m E =t Au >q c - a u- 4t ON n{, V V = O tam E L a,y tt O. ^� a c GYRE w ON a O. E LT �n L O OaL L at3 g NN .L_ nq a. qL. a oy V O C E NL ffbffy 9 VO Y p V ==Za f; y � 9 H N y' Nom^ A G q.eO qE � .CO .^ ++ 29y 3 Ey qy NFL Ya N�.. u n rn Y a uT, 7 A YcI CT CL� t O tr W ��u - 79 « �- ` ``' E O' nj' !/ Y Gam.-. p_ C mot' 2 q .EL .NO�n t• ` FO C O r J i.. n0 v R.-`L QCn tT A. G4 U cC0 O Tf O,�. F U R , r 1-N.p YSt NNE 23,E ALE. A1G n a It OUn C5 O9 Ci OYy Y 6.a •�bo t Em " d A UO L U I- x ` ."' W pq rya CL Oa �.. rn LY qW Ci Ql, w t c c ». '� LL y'a L d�t L L Lir 4d � '.9 9CL ApVII �IIq as . �. 6F~ S C •� Ed Y yYj'L N N O L,G.. q EF C W q E d o. N wvn ��- L A d ^° V L • 'E - m eb E� « Y Y M A 9, M L A Y VNryO„ q° a..E v m ty .p _ } O EaEa W LLOCy Q6Y UO ON �u Y y u AO A .- �� • O d O A i+, C D PAW dD �W �A �+ [�Jf•� QA a Ab6C UM y m G J Iles d bL Oc T 2 L u bb w C 'v a d u G OA C Ob ka 9v LOq n4 N E a 2bc y °q N L c `�G.,v bL u^ tG ccu-- b C c.- 3 A a L n A O G'G^ a a 9'n" .pueY �p ma O W t Cd U' II as dE dE A� o' Lp d a Lp.. =-O L , 24b G A G A' O 0. d ^ O a Y. Hp N a a r OII m dL C y N W a0. . V E d L RGA r P 6 d o E N, N L L b P C O 0.a E II G3 ol L ^O' DO , q L bE a T cr w �v unia� N O uL a- c d c aA N c� d° °N EA u Y L C. y NY9Nr AD E� CF q` WNO WUU �6 a 4y p. pN t?�65 Qi 40 QITV FO q q a ti 7 eD ..•G� Y. y t, n_ C � y >n dQ Ly6�yn N '^ a. n P C S ` L E A q•. a � L) 9 LO. N Qa1 C E -O6 5 yo. G auiti. � R.�a Nq' "N.AU vyo F6r ,P.Fy o.;... Sy L ' AaLX w4Z �iCCi mT —'79" m- y �yE droY°.� yn Ld:6A- Ga CL Ed * Y R 2, y `.Y CCCI d .Ede GC�N CLY�N.L d ro46L� d CG Q tr .0 �• S.L A LOaa U� ° E N - V 1 .6C N rU 'LW. TL E S ,� N6W.A 66N� NOS .AT `yi1L 4U 6r WYtn L1L i�...�6 �°,yy .( y P to p: A d U P A N Os L L LAP ZE d E y .a a A V S L Nn 3q HN d F.q •^� N C y9 Fr �l� ++SL+n ED a J L '°•'o NL �fU G� Lu u B p� U d G CC N d C� � d w E CO. y F u C O J ° w '9 a C •'• AA y�uAi °U E6 E H NSp Ct w V� a C d O L'qV NN C-z F c� Q V � Ly z N ti � .t 'T C S� 'v 4'/ yw,. rr xr ci •O r,N >� as y L y Y� �La Y L yY n'^ `-.� ¢ W= N n .a- r d NEyy L r d o N 19 R Dt L •'-Vrn roM 3 N �S AI... CVP C L A3 L... eRiY Lrn i.3 �Y te- • a 1 �N � , � V G \1 N � \ _ yjppyF O O a0, 6 Lw 4. b L i� Y6YQ- p d L .> � n 79 w w O c9 d L M y T 2L d O. ~ M u 3 O L oy DrED W � cG r rov E u�.. �L Q v. CD• - L< V .u.� '� w t� ¢A U �.p LL � •�. ¢w Y u pr. ¢ d E S.R.. L d9 V c L N ..0 � rrU r fr. bU i C 4 R J S a O 2'.e+ h 22, " w FZ m d °, g � '� t G.'dyf� ✓ .� 4 t - CITY OF TtANCHQCUCA1vi0NGA cx r b n STAFF REPORT s O ` 0 7 DATE: February, 26, ;1986 TO Plann7tigrComnisso "n FROM`t Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: EN:VIRONMEMiAI ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MA ,',9349 - .SMITH - A':davision acre o an ` in c° k ,parce, s in a ' ow Development District, (2' du /ecl loca ed an the.s4uth side of Strang Lane, 'West a$ = of Carnelian Avenue, Op 1061471 -07 I. PROJECT AND .S.ITE DESCR °IRTIDN €- A. Action Reguested,: Appeovar of Parcel Map. B. .t Purpose: - To diwpide 1:3 acres of land into 2 parcels in the' Very Low D-evol'opment District, . C. Location:, South side. of Strang Lane;, west of Carnelian. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 25,341 square feet Parcel 2 - -90,12Z square feet Average Lot Size - 22,731 square feet E. Existinq Zoning: Very Low Residential (2 du/ac) F. Existing _Land Use: Parcel 1 - Existing single family Parcel 2 Vacant G. Surrounding Land Use: ortn — Exis �r�'ng residential - South - - Vacant East -- Existing residential =r West - Existing residential H. Surrounding General Plan and Develo ment Code Designations' Nort - very Low esi entTa u ac South - Vary Low Residential (2 du/ac) East - Very Low Residential (2 dulac ) 4;, West - Very Low Residential (2 du/ac) ITENF E ENVIR01ihaENTRL 55tSSM Nil AVD PARCEL NEAP 9549, SMITH Februarjr 26, .1986° Page 2 i I Site Cr:aracterist cs A na,.nal drainage chann"e�l runs through the westerly. si e o Parcel ] sin9i`e family residence is also ltocated,".gn Parcel I:. Parcel 2;s II. ANALYSIS: The'purpase, off�t�ie." parcel map i`s, .to subdiv7de an a .stiryg 1 3 acre `parcel an�ta twos parpe7 =s tlarcerl �1 X11- 666train the, iax'f rn9 residence on the proper.`,i y,. Parcel 2� 11 tiedeyelroped'l in4 the fuisure. ° &ot parGe;l,s Will take'; a`c`cess: from 'Strang ;lame Whxeh is a paved- private street extendangk tathe ss a -fro G'a'nnelian. ,Avenue .a d3stianee of= approximately = °90O feel #_ 5t� =ang ,Lane "is�apreseni y ma ntatned� ti the abutting. :property owners. This subdivison does of canfrom ti the basic Planning fonsnission "Policy D stated in' Resoif�"" No., 7947 requ'-vin dedicated, access. for "g- subdividing, hc-- 3ver%t coutld be approved`�inder the allowable varl,atibns section of the ame resolutions {refer tu- Exhibit'C) "Staff feels that a varfatj<,`n is appropHatel because the parcels confowr� ;to the General Plan an&,'Develbpment Code requiirements, ,here are several parcels nf generally, the Same iea`along `Strang Lane, and': the parcel map will dedicate street r ght n, way and"ptov }de -a 'lien agreement for the future Y. constructions of a"needed cui de sac bulb at the terminus of Strang Lane. The Planning Commissions appears to have the following optlo�s,! 1 Approve the parcel -map a s p roposed subject to the access variai�ons, 2, Continue the parcel' maq., with the consent of the applicant, untie dedicated access c ¢atai,ned to the site from Carnelian Avenue, or F 3. Denial of the parcel map, 3c` Staff has receiveb t a letter from the adjacent property owner in favor of the proposed parcel map. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration.is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted - afield investigation. Upon complexion and review of the, Initial Study and field investigation, Staff. -found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed sLbdiv sion. IV. CORRESPONDENCE. Notices of Publi'61�Hearing 'have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in >the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. 4c` SE�S �F�e r�dnyt 86 Page.a at +�. V. R��COMMENDAiI+IQN• It�� .��ec e�►` t at'te *P�1�dntttnC s con de = MY - � an a is nts o i at P rc 34 a ter sic ron�r * onrt a ss' an u eco e p roe Hof thea acied Re z tte..o� °a°Nega v + i7`e, ar o d be app.r.OD- tale s �� - �1 x Respectful M B bgs r k Attachments V,ifo Mar Eix�i b A�}� - Reso�l ion i9 07(Ej hi Yit� „C}> a ME Res�ol'u ton - Recoj�rne dedgnd'ht�u'r�sofp�proval �Initial'l�tu�y krµ1 .'VA v r r r J a Sr .rte';. •�.% � ..3esA�..:, _ .. veots.� . �... 2.3s,... '- ty _..�s.'}eCa.�.m...Aa,m ,�. a. w._.,�,e : ` �k L:.. .y7r PaeZ � : 4 - • � w F Q�,. Pa) t Poe 9 9 x964 iylA 9yld . caaaa a2 7f@H --•w PRt.7 000 fte Pail V 8l (ate 22 � 23 12f y liC LISAC sc ss 2'• A +c `o \lhal 5$QiANtP -s �, A i 5t _ �. .. �'Ur f,00 .. _... -' ♦ 7a r;' !wa ��yt �`�.`/` "}' s Syr t f A 0.M 4. 1.. f � 9.71A9i3A5 ' s .4 to it :. f2. CITY OF �� PARCFC. MAP 9348 ,t ��n �g �i�T A �� �T A RANCHO C c tC,rsal!'i{�i�aG V E C i N 1T`fi MAP A L:.. µ�. � •� � Mn4YJK'eIl" � �� N � ne acoz reF JaA ss•6i l t' AIR mz 5 (LO co 1 ��� *4 tom', '. ��+rt 5 � a^ � . �' X,�Y'`�.�%d'"!'?�' ✓!�"`r S, ,. , xcfi+. ` ek` ..;: �� �' wa V d `.< -. A ,RES;gGU c9��1 Tl 2 , Pig i`ti�ZNc COA3l115STAN OF TIt,E, CIT�i `OF� O CUCAPIOhC,�1 ES'kABLS IIII;G SUBDt�UTON ACCE5S'I�ROVaEMENT" POZCY._" ° .., a < WE(E EAS, t14 Plannin C6mmis Lori ,oE the -City of- Rancho Cucamonga � wishes to discau == 6p the p: clifletatiOn of private'unimproved , shpsets, an. t'} , WHEREAS, ilk: 14,te6ossa%y to °establish firm Yalicp guideline to inform property owngrs clf'bshe,City goal's. THEREF( E, BD +S RESQIiCED AND ES7ABLISItED,_r3. at as a aotndci ti 6n of approval o£ any "Marcel ?Iap, farce) tape 041vver, T1ract tSap ar Lot. "'Line , Adjustmertt'an appl cat t st%t]p haue sco�es` o a fully 'dedicaked a{}d' malntained City streets Where ddicatoiQ and imptot�ements do het exist, the. ppl3cAnt shall ob.Cain a minmumaf `foty'F(GO) feet n£ d`edl"catan end improve wi 2 twenty-six (26) f set ofavement. rIe'eded'µtreet.Efrpnta`ge to rea Chu Cde px` •,maintained City s:tree�ta Variations from this ;policy., will require appio,I of the City Engineer of the City Uf Rancho`Cucamongt subject to, appeals to the Pla # ;ning,. Commission. APPROM AND AD01'TE`il THUS 24TH DAY OF ,tANUARY, 1979. 'rt PLANNING COMMISSION OP ,THE CITY OF RANCHO CUMIONGA « � a ' - Herman Rempel, Chairman. ,, Secretary of the Planning Commission 1, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Res,ilution was duly and regularly iA.troduced,° # passed, and adoptel.r -q, the Planning,, Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting t' .he Planning Commission hold on the 24th day of January, 1479, by the fallowing vote to -wit: i ' rj AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GARCIA, TOLSTPY, JONES, RMTEL I NOES: COMlII5SZONERS: ONE ABSENT. COT•USSIONERS: DAHL U EXHIBIT 'T" ¢� ,�� mr OF - coo cir +ot� � � � • 'l3 6"' � P4�lnra"4 DIVISION ,FES' 1 1986 M' 198 6 •'lz Fcn ca.aaN G r91V N�►+� for +L4 J «a3 zcwec Q� . -tS sm p� Qi! �"!$•kzh rUL.`a14;t4h.d� h e EA-% +W G 0 N fie.b A 6 r Y" A:r P. Ai. T 4 lh`e—= 'r C*G3 NVA -e- P,.-C) p as-& N D14RING -1-Y4-z ACCT- /0 A Ja mRS a evo 1 UJJR #4RzC- e.OdfJwPtOj AVr -rte. -r- OC�.Vy P�LeruAr -rvvm..tTR.zwv/ -rv2*F A.RMA." i -vb -Vpvs- yoo pop,. -rt �►►� -R, ��.... - 7 cam, + d a. -• 1y 'yam t NdTId • °OF POBLIC, HE RING hYt RANCHO "CU PLMN , NG,�COMMIS I9N 1 The Rancho C'uoamoq PI fihfigg Crop ssion. will be Wilding public 1 at T:00 p.m.., on Eaebrua ►`26 l9$5 a he �lionss_Park to 7:00 Bu�il rig located at 9161 Base Lune 1Roady t „� rcho. Cticambnye California 81330, to coi d4der` the following described prQecir(s): a ASSES D PARCEL MAP 9349 - SMITN - A division of 1..3 acres ENVIRONMENTAL arcelsNr p the Virg Low Vevelopmen't District (2 »'du /ac) locatpu on the south side of 5tr-an%, Lane .,'west of Carnel fan, Avenue - ANN 1061 4 31 -Q7.. � ` Anyone having concerns or questions on any of the above items are welcome toll contact the City Planning Division at (314) 989 -1851 or visit the offices; Icoated at 9340 Base Line Road, linit a. Also, an-vane objecting to or in favor of the above, may appear in persnn -at , the above- described meeting or may submit their concerns in +fitting tb the Planning Division, City of )echo Cucamonga prior to said meeting.``,• February 14, 1986 �_� Rancho Cucamonga PlannIpj'Commission r p i I ( rw: VIRQNQBIB T" AL REVIRVT EPPLICATIOI ° p ,� F g • INITIAL STUB U !977 / II , T, GENERAL For all projects requiQi g envyi,Ironmenkal review, thus form must be comp'teted� . and °submitted to the oe,e�opment Review Con n}ittee through the department where woe project application fisimaTe''are PartrlCeofttfie Ic taalpStudy is , make a Planning Division staff wil prepare Co�xnissinn will make one recommendations to Planning Ccri l`►ssio�e proj,ectnlw9l i have no significT�e, of three determinations: impact, and an Environmental environmental impact and a Negatiyw Declaration wilt be filed, (�� project will have � significant environmental imp Impact Report will be pr °Pared+ or (3') . An additional irfoi, nation r..th should be supplied by then applicant giving further nfornsat ;eo concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: Project Title: �' �'� p Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone.�!_�� Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Name, Address, Concerning this Project: Location of Project: r' Assessor's Parcel List other other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: R. PROJECT DESCRIPTJ --dj' s Proposed use or proposed project: �c ;-���t _^�., '-Z" ` x t & Acreage of project area and square footage Uf existin .and' ro o if :any:- /G �; S b=T•ti> g P p sed buildings, l . f i. Describe the 'environmental ettiing z the project site including, on topography, —961T. gy ity,,,plants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, .land use of surrounding propetti!es, and the sheets) o�, =any existing s�tructurete and their use (attach necessary �I sheets }. / "�., ,C or Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of- cumulative actions, which although. individually small, may as -a whole have significant environmental impact Al /A WI1t THIS, AROJECZ �`i YES-NO 1• Create a suhstaAt�ial.chan in ground contours? � 2. :Create a substantial change in ezis$tn` noise of produce vibration or glaret� z '} 3. Create a substlanti-ri Change in demand fo��municzNnr � serViceS olive , a s a' etG. (P , S-lre w ter sewaq� 4. create changes in the existing, Plan deslgnati'dtis? g �'" General_ t, 5. Remav any exii wing tree-' l Hot, many? S.` Create the need�or use or dis os. ", of otentia7l y hazardous , fiat ,alss such as toxic ,substances, 72 ` flamnahles or explosives? ,, ., Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional s)eets if necessary . .. _:_.�' 7. Estimate the amount of sewage, and solid wasfe materials, this project wi11 aenerate. daily: r�,r 8. Estimate the number o': auto and truck trips generated daily 1by tms project: �, ,, , 9. Estimste the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, In cubic yards: Ali, /,g 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units,. cO ete the form on the next: pane. - CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above -land An the attached exhibits present the data and information required for U5is " initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the. facts,, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best' -of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information be be may required to submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the planning Division. Date :� Signature Title [f� �}'7e I. "_..:+T'eP.'—, NN RESIDVITIAL CONSTRUCTIdN The following Jnforijat$.00 should be. provided to the City of Ranc a Cuc mor�ga Planking DivIs1�� ord@z to a7r, l e sckiool d istrict ixr assps's"i g their ability to. Accomm ":aaVo'-the rd`o5ee residential dev2lopmentw Developers are' pfrom , required tb .secure le>`^ters the school - istt"t for. accemmadatin3 -the increased number of students .riior to issuance of bt..,:dding: permits Name or Developer and Untative Tract No.: Specific Location o: Project:.: ! PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL �. Number of single 1 family units: 2, Number of multiple; family units: 3. pate proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date. of occupancy: Modell and # of Tentative f S. Bedrooms Price Rana -4 t? RESOLUTION NO, A RESOD TION OF THE PLANNING- COMMISSION OF IiHE CITE' OFRAN( d2MOgd. °CALIFORNIA, ,AP.PROYING PAC :' mo NUMBER��, 9349 (TINT T,VF��PARCEL MAP I, 9349 LOCATE[! ON` THE �MTN- SIDE O'Y STRfNG- 1At;EiST. 4F =" "CARNELIAN AVENUE. WHEREAS_ T�`�ntative Parcel Map Number _9349 submitted byriany, Smith and 2!parcels, consisting of located on the south side of =Strang L / ^ne, east of Carnelian Avenue, being a dlv4siun '4 of Lot Block 13,, Cucamo�a Ho�estead . 141 Assocution .Lands, as recorded i'n Book..` 6, Page 46. of Maps�,T. San Bernard no ` \ County, State oaf Califor€�a;, and WHEREAS, on 'June 28, 1985 -a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described- Tentative Map; r and l ` WdFREAS, on February 26 1-986 th Panning 'Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- des4ribad map. 1,10W, THEREFORE, TIE RANCHO.CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS y} FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been m•7e: ' 1. That the map ..' consistent with the,6eneral Plan. t 2. That the improvement of the proposed" sup 4ivision. is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed devel.�pment. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health prob4ems or halve Adverse affects on ab<<tting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental- mpacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on Februaq 26, 1986; SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 9349 is approved subject to .the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF February, 1486 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman f � 5-13 ,n fix°• iii ` p *� � u ATTEST; e' Dep�ityec�^etary �� °`` �$ F 41 I, Brad BUi�ler„ �D�epu y� S crp *jN 41.p the PYanni:ng C�nxii�ss�ion oir th Caty ,of Rancho °Cueamnga;�¢dof ereby�cQ�ti�ythat the fo7egoin Resolution Wa'Sdb1 a and . regalaly ,int`►°odaedas`s"e °a dadop a 1'nning Comn�ss6i�te 4 , ed by ite P City d Rancho Ceamnga� ,a aega meefag, of the PJannivtg3Comqlssion ,iterld r on the 8th .day of e r6arkr °1486, .by he folT ing, - vot6!4:, wig; AYES CDMMI+�SSPO`NItS NQES: CpS *SSONERS ABSENT: "CDMMSSPDNER °5 6 � ff 15 w } 7410" T s �, s ,y .., to .A * ".. ` .•,: '� � CITY'OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA"'y � RECt}i'iEHDED °COHDITIaHS�OFPPR ©VLt��` i OCATION:. sough salde' of tang l "ane, iEtiiATIY&PARCEL AAP east, vhf • Carnelsiam; ? RATE FILED dune 28, jg.i 5 ti +LEGAL QESCRIP.iO ission of a HUFt y O^L01s�� 2 y portion of 1:6t $ 8,1 cic 13 Cucamonga 62SDSS AIRFAGE'" X1.3,q_neJt)& qp HomestEa�1 As "socjiaiton Cands�recorded AS�E�55 2 PARCEL NO i' 110°614 -27i OZ Ba * *qe�aunGy *A_t *+Y* ik* li*** ifk' k' *�**irirlrkirkRir*k ' _ fit#' &'k:ka}iMF ti6kir _ { A. DEVEXOPER n Uil ER ;�_ Et6AYHEEIt� }S 1Y Oi�.-t� ,- Brian Smith _ �' SAME. 17i,c iae�l F s �i� uaY -L 88f1Lrtran 120 ` _ 9. Lane Wood�and�Street" Rancho Cucamonga CA,,gUU s~ - Cxnao CAS gib "33 Improvement. and Bedi'cartion r iraiints Y �n accordance w 416 of the Runi`xipal Code o the City,af nc4�o Cucamonga �4 inciude .hut mey icro�� tse I sn�f{ , to, the follo�ring: _,.. A. Dedi.cations and rY'ehacuTat, Acces's 4 ' 1. Dedications ` hal'1 ^,,made of all interior ,s, reet rights -of -way. , and 01 necessary easements as shown on, 'the lentatift map. x 2. Offer of De0cation shall be made of.the following rights -oft way an the fdllowrng - streets: (as shown on Tentative Parcel Map). 30 xxxrxxxxxx feet on Strang Lane additional feet on additional feet on - 3. Corner property line radius wj -ii be required., per City Standards. l; _ ..� ; 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be`"ded cated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maiptenanc4 agreements ;`ensuring access to all parcals. and joint main'tenanceAof all co' non roads, drives or parking areas shall .be provided by C.Cj &R.s and shall be- recorded concurrent with'the maps; ��� �1; 5", 1"':,'7Pt ��r$`.L �.. 'T`artr' *TTa. .•+e- TSP'.*NR!fF4Ai;`P. .q,...1�. 53T'R`�°., i'..'M�Ra. 6. Al'i existiin9 easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or. delineated on the ." ma �. r6quirements p Per City Engineer s 7. Easements for S144ewalk for public use shall be dedicated to tne, City where sidewalks meander through private property. . �' B. Street I ravemrnts rsuant to the ity of Ranch Cucamonga .'Unicipal Code, Titl'e� °16. Section 16.36.120, the -` . $u6div4de may enter into-an ag.- eeMent and post securifty ,with the City guaranteeing the required construction prier to recordatfion: of the ,map andtor building permit. issanceT� ' Construct ,full street improvements ineludi,ng but not l trted to, curb , and gutter, AX. pavement, sidewalk, drr.e' apprm��c5�es,, parkway, trees and street Iights or, a l interi�or4s reots 2. A minimum, of 26-fdat Wide pavement within ° 'a 40 -foot � •wide dedicated right -of =way shall be construct7d Div.. for all h-41f- section streets. . -.. ..ti 3. Construct the folJowing missing improvements., ' Prior to recordA on for Prior to building; permit s#ssunce for CUFF i er. Drive Stree 't" true" q, h?e ian Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk A ` r. Trees •Llbhe; Overly Bland* Other ;. fi *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter 4. Prior to any work being perf g4med in the public right -of -.way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer'$ Office, in addition to any other permits reggired, S. Street improvement vlans shall bi+ prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment perm t.l`. 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. 7. Existing lines of 12KY or less fronting the property shalt be undergrounded. " 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs,] striping and markings with locations and types approved by, the . City Engineer. i i -_ ce F;duit Pr e roal�e �, ' 'as a$p'_ a � e fe . 47 � y " k Al i, m ee7i► for T and Al bet t- - tnj : kA .Q%.T a ai s osai L' u. or ag'� e,e'_dnnse � res o-eut,p ratr} !-a w ¢a�s'a d i p t �a� i fntS�i�,d a,Z , yLt prra. � elg C areas; l'loht ng ,storm drain ". ts`ali ''bed f sta8iled,i too the Ction of the City Gnnirioui` s Ii. C' nee t' ca sureiy�� "d sat' a xa. g +ar —or.dr X. 2 1 and, 2 t y� . tree r X. f 3, Su mb cq�mp ee, i dewaie [L [lrai�eaue��td�lQOSt;� X i. priVat �i. raqu'rea, X 2.- Adequate of sutf a 3. The fo satisfa ce F;duit Pr e roal�e �, ' 'as a$p'_ a � e fe . 47 � y " k Al i, m ee7i► for T and Al bet t- - tnj : kA .Q%.T a ai s osai L' u. or ag'� e,e'_dnnse � res o-eut,p ratr} !-a w ¢a�s'a d i p t �a� i fntS�i�,d a,Z , yLt prra. � elg C areas; l'loht ng ,storm drain ". ts`ali ''bed f sta8iled,i too the Ction of the City Gnnirioui` Crabt of ' hey subject property shO l be in "accordant with the . VIP k� Bu idizng Code, :City :Grading - 3StandardS ana accppted n. 'final 'p " w' gratitnq'` practices. The grading °l an sa1.1 6e in substaiitial conformance with the app"roved conceptual grading ' , X 2. A sofils report shall' be prepared by a qua engineer lidenseed byll, the State"-of : Cal- ifornfa >,to perform such` work prior ' Lo' Oarijai,c building permit. .� A geologicai report shall be prepared by aF quAlific' engineer ar eplagtstt and, submitted at ? tlte..time of aPplitation`, or grading plan check, ;I 4. � r ih furl grading, lan sl'all be- 'subject to review` and approval .11 'Cprnnittea by, i he Grading and`,;-�ahaTl be comet 't d Y p nor to recardatstdn.,oi file final subdivsion reap or, �t`suatce i of buikdiiigf permt�i `t�ljlObeuer - comes ff r~st, a`. 5. Fiq'arfix grddi "ng plans for each parcel are, to be= submitted to the ~ Bu�ldtng and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of Sufi&ll - permit. F. General, Regulrevie ,and Approvals X it 1 Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans- for San '6ernar.,dinn ounty ao ontY d strict y =,Cucamonga "County Water;.¢istri.ct for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust,Abatement (required prior to j �" it of a grading permit) Other Z. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R..$) j approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map., �� ` X S, Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that,may be received from them: -4- 7 7- 4. 34, st c ; 3� „among1 he net�Y 6077e� dW pare f s ; ff al ,map sub it�ta i; 't a fiolla, �i,ni�sh ; r6eA i eporte t aAverase ca 2c�ul aiorsr t {a�hee 7ded� ands de'ecfs usedes 'reference an '1'» ;lan�aiYsvorr;, t ;motes. antl beitdo Aar s � s�na iii oe,�vlu? %,giw,itrt j a OCltiiy# i nbUn 41 latoh, oaf theRnna`1 Maps x° foot' easemer t for T,acaF equtest ian. 'tram Id4 �6 shou' � w M x w4 alorc� the south property 1�,7es os;Pa�cet 1.a�;d 2 �` X 7a _ X 2. The 20 foot equestrian traial sha17 be' constructed ors ;parcel No—, 1 4 6u, 1 prior to .rec�rdatian' af, the final map: ¢ °� X 3. Drainage from this site_will not be all to flow east. Drainage fatilitfes direct }a�sl dta the f1,ow westerly i'r•,om parcel.,t2 across �Parq'el 1 shall" be, construct -ted,' Within sae X 8 L i a pr r�a�i�nag easement to the satisfaction of tWe Building Of9 0,1 -i"op Ito .' ma ` ire ani {i Qai X 4 P; ' f LLOYD 8. HUBBS, 'CITY EN6IsisER ^° � bY: M' ` -- X—: IUn Ai: R, caF i shi re3 11,. Hot U! 6. Special ,Condibi 7 7- 4. 34, st c ; 3� „among1 he net�Y 6077e� dW pare f s ; ff al ,map sub it�ta i; 't a fiolla, �i,ni�sh ; r6eA i eporte t aAverase ca 2c�ul aiorsr t {a�hee 7ded� ands de'ecfs usedes 'reference an '1'» ;lan�aiYsvorr;, t ;motes. antl beitdo Aar s � s�na iii oe,�vlu? %,giw,itrt j a OCltiiy# i nbUn 41 latoh, oaf theRnna`1 Maps x° foot' easemer t for T,acaF equtest ian. 'tram Id4 �6 shou' � foot ea`s" ment for loeal' eques i�an trait sha11 bey p�rov,d, eJ, alorc� the south property 1�,7es os;Pa�cet 1.a�;d 2 �` _ X 2. The 20 foot equestrian traial sha17 be' constructed ors ;parcel No—, 1 1 prior to .rec�rdatian' af, the final map: ¢ °� X 3. Drainage from this site_will not be all to flow east. Drainage fatilitfes direct dta the f1,ow westerly i'r•,om parcel.,t2 across �Parq'el 1 shall" be, construct -ted,' Within sae a pr r�a�i�nag easement to the satisfaction of tWe Building Of9 0,1 -i"op Ito .' ` recorda'tion of the final mai r'I CITY OF RANCIS Cl,2iMDKGA ' f LLOYD 8. HUBBS, 'CITY EN6IsisER ^° � bY: M' V ( k _.; Fr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cACAMo STAFF REPORT a C1 L7 } DATE: Fekjuary 26, 1986 1977 ` TO Chairman and Members.-of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Duiler, City,Piann {er y, 4Y: John R. Meyrar, Assistant Plankicr SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -44 - propa93 o eve op a 0 square ""fool n ustrial building on x.02 acres ofland located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and Lucas =Ranch Road in the General 7ndustriai /Rail- Served District (Subarea 5) - APN 210- 032 -65 & 06. ­Parcel 1 & 2 of Parcet Map 4762 I. PROJECT AND SITE - DESCaiPTION: 1 ` ' A. Action Requested:" Approval of conceptual master plan, site plan, elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zocng: i North - Industrial Use, SWaria 5 South - Vacant, Subarea 5 East .. Vacant, Subarea 5 West - Industrial Ilse, Subarea 5 C. General Plan Delignations: Project Site - General Industrial /Rail Served North General Industrial /Rail Served South General Industrial /Rail Served East - General Industrial /Rail Served West - General Industrial /Rail Served D. Site Characteristics: 'the site slopes moderately to the south at approximately one o two percent grade. ; II. ANALYSIS: A. General: This proposal consists of one single -story mu i- Tenant industrial building that fronts on 6th Street. The -proposed el'eva'tions consist of exposed aggregate concrete we! ..:o, tinted windows .With black anodized mullions and a painted accent stripe. This is the first development of a -- previously approved 16 lot parcel map. i ITEM F '17777 7, PLAN 1NIl1G G`�t1, 911IQ PO „,l, Rr s February 26 INZTI r DR 8544 - Fa1,k _ ' B. Design Review Committee: Design Review- Committee ot� J'anuary e 4011; m , � ” 1. A Master Plan be pr-ovideol for the balance 0.� the block." 2. Additional 1jarldscaping be incluied along the SOW side of the „building, through the use of tree pockets. ' . Provida a -act 1 ocati on's of walkways. 1 eadi nci to 'l the building entrz.11ces, "plaza 4. Provide an employee area with benches, shade trees, and comparable amenities. S 5. Provide alternative color schemes. The applicant made the revisions and then took the project back4: through DRC on a consent calendar basis on February 6, 1486, `t The Committee recummended that the master plan provitle specific ;! locations i for fyturerldrive approaches and approximate locations of employee plaza aareas -, The Committee felt 1arger, lomnon"plaza /open spaces �rOiuld be prcvided and linked with i' stronger pedestrian connections. \, The revised site plan reflected additional tan;�sc�aping along the south side. of the \ �\ ;,building and an employee FIa:a area. however, the Committee recommended that the plaza areas should bi s minimum 400 square feet (see'F- xhibit "E"). The Committee recommended this project be ;placed on the next- PI anning Commission Agenda with conditions concerpitig the location of walkways and color- - palette. In addition, Staff believes the location of trash* enclosalre and employee plaza areas should be reconsid:;red. Staff believes the plaza area should be located north of its present location, from away the major drive approach (see - Exhibit "B ";f- In addition, Staff believes Y one, double bin trash enclosLtre located at the center, (see Exhibit "B" ), -if the building's south elevation to replace ' - the two i ndi vi d6- _e( i 1 osures located near the IiWn access drives would improve the entries to the project. "• C. Technical Review Committee: This project �; -s reviewed b the 4 ec n7ca Review o�rimz ee who recommends: 1) that the existing overhead utility lines be placed under ground and the po1, b,) removed, and 2) that Parcels 1 & 2 be,--combined through Me �. *. ? 'rot adjustment, '.. s. r lm"— 75"' : 7� s ^b` I � 5 , PCANN•tG CO,14� � 0 � F R�kPOR;I� t ,. , Februa�L6_;9$ DR. $sue - Page 3 r }} D. Gradiri;'Ccf w a�ttee►e Grading Commi4ee .has conce tua1y ,. app ave t.dh to ftr a gt adimg, sub ent an approved Win. , {afan rfar, o th l ua4ce, of building ,permits.. 5 E. . Enviroomarttai , Assessment` , Part I of the, In t„1al Study ha's been $� comps e y t�ieaP Tacant Staff his com�r7eted Part II ofi the enviironr�Qntala��citec Fkst .and f1wVd no sxgnyf4cant Overrte impacts ort tegenWronm At as 4a Jesuit of athas pr`o;7ect If I. 6-e Commis'sion,�conCur �,qj, �Staff�s..findtngs an fissuance. of a . Negati ie tiealat t*Ea�nt�rouid`,'bp _in, order. ^" III,. FAC7 FUR FYNDINrras� th,, �ro��r�t Is -qonsi�ste,nt, with the. MGahe a'•1 " Ffan art t e an as riaa $pectfxa Phan. 'Tjle pruJ`ect Wjl'l not causer � a Ognific,ant adverse Impa'et and In addltTOn, °the propose,4 `use, building ,design; site , pTan, "tagdther with the recaf¢nended. "zr.i►ce with conditions rf rovai,. are in comp! the In4 stria? „. Specific Plan acrd all other applicable provisirona of the City j_ Standards.. IV. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning- Commission review and, consider all element's of the prdj;eet •::::�f after such consideration, tha. Commifssi'on,, concurs with :he findings and .I Conditions of App'ro'val as re&Ane -tided, adoption of the attached Resolution with wod-A be appropriate -. ,r Respectfully su . "tteda Brad Buller, City Plannf:r 86:JRM:das a Attachments Exhibit "A" - Location and Site Utilization Map Exhibit "By - Site Plan Exhibit "r," - El 'evations Exhibit "D" - Conceptual landscape , ",nd Grading Plans Exhibit "E" - Employee Plaza Area ;J Exhibit :4T" - Waster Plan Exhibit "4FG" - Parcel Map initial Study part II Resolution. of Approval and Standard Ccndi tions J 1 r \1 ,r,. { • z i •7 C 1I OF iT'EI�I: RANCHO CUCAMONGA: 1 PLANNM DnqscN EX IIBIT - SC�L E= r ]MINE wo Issit IN sm F;pnt W.i . /V •� [.N+i.1 Ti..x lea! ---- -- __ SI I}WiJre"fR" irla ufw.K cover io a ^ rR KM'Fw@iu iT4Nj G*'/{' r('(9iA ' AY M rTS yv N(!1�''(-•�,�Y:� i XbeF ie rG..!✓tq:d <.m ` r•0. _ ice'!""'. t V�Ci'r {•flcll. l+{'%p�YY .. A 4 m'!•11��GG - `,` yr4 fwAk ii•i- /CIK��1OL Tcm Z t1ir" � LANDSCAPING FLAN lam"- 1 �.. -� .�i utri -� -..,,r .�.L3• . K- „L_' ..I' d v,^ ` C.... � � � � � � �.. � � ��"5�i Fiiw— S'�Lr• � �� +�P(7{I�'_ �' d� _U�l F �i ~PLAN `\ NIOR'I'H CITY MEND RANCHO CUC MOINGA TITLE: PLAMING DI,!7jM� EXHraIT — SCALE: t —� � -- f 4. t I CITY O - j AAI`ICM i; MONIGA.^ f FLAI1jNtNG DINSION EXHIBIT SCAM .......... I +.,sr"J �• � ;�.�cv mss. vr« ♦.• Jr__ 27Gq�`f - '/d rr`sfs'� j / cTa'IP.. ^xsrd .. •.:j � ��•. u A t• /S E° I �} ► t a � r ten• *FARCEL2 8 � ii• + ti t c I RCEL f' a arait + >, • 1 r+� r . C rot ' \\ NOT•'N'l1' Ntct> w �irr ��� •• '� I '; BR s <a)•r1 � • � � _ •viwr,Mjy/,,. �i r'•trJf iv I.,• 1 S dos WAA tF 4 V new• PARCEL 9 g F RCEL 8 rrr.� Y LL [[[[ srz.......f � aJri•. rscv '�°`w,�tN�� ,�b irsay, i rn_ia o_ F;� RCM li jw j. I � r S }� r`it•Jr�as• l�} a rw.aec k �. y � tt `,• ' ,..r::s a "� ;ARCEL 13 s:RC`.L PARCEL e4 ,_ F.... i . i�.r�.c �� ,e I ki � • �aT��' sio t �,9. � � R <•.cJsay MwRML17 J(JG {J rn• � �ir` sr NN so. \e `✓w l• 810/4• .K1M• T• iIT I \ ri:f i ,.� \.�.iM:J:iJ�.O ��•' -_ n� X2.,,,2 �� •.i R41 ID• v 1 �.i ` JI • ?T •+.b yl NORTH CITY CF PI.rkINM D[`JSSM EXHIBIT-_ SC AJE. _ — 1 CITY CF RAACHO CL'CAN ?.. -. x= PART Ti' -. SNIII�IL S?1•A1 ,' i ENVIR%TtiIE. TAL CHECKLIST DATE: DATE ; " ar To PROJECT: V PROJECT OCATION: ,5 :. E.WiRON NTAL IMPACTS ! (Explanation of all °fye ,< sheets) k " and " "maybe ". answers, are required on attached l 7 YES , MIBE K Soils and Geoloev. Vill. the propos have NO _IL significant results in, a. Unstable ground conditions or ,n changes in / geologih relationships? J b.- Disiuptions,. displaremen'_s, compaction c,r burial of the soil? I Change in topography or ground surface contour intexvals? d. The deatruct•ion, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting dither on or off site , canditons? / f. - Changes in erosion`siltatian, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or poperty to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud - slides, ground failure, or'similar hazards? h. use increase in t11 -.rate of extraction andfoh -An use o f f :.ny min"_i_i' rceourceh 2. Hydrolaev< Will the proposal have significaflt results in: quality? - .> .. quantity? f 3 h. The reduction in the amount ox water other- wise ava-ilable for public water jl supplies? i L. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding r � f • e�'LP' �' - YES u3YBE ' a. tka=ges in currents, or the course of direction _lowing screams,,_ rivers, 's e a. Constant or periodic air emissions from voblle or ephemera stream c%annelsF - or indirect-sources? J � b, ChavEges i.n absorption rates; dr�ivjage patterns, or the interference with the attniment`of applicable rate and amount of s+trfake wager runoff? air quality standards? a. Alterations to the epurse cr flow of flood maters? J C. Alteration of local or regional climatic u d, Chang % in the amount of surface water inany body of oa temperature? n< water? 4. Riots e. Discharge into surface waters, or any ` f 2lteration of surface water qual tv? % a. Change in the characteristics of species, f-. Alteration of,groundwater.characteristic5? 4 !� g. Change in th. uan *.it q y -of groundGaters, either through direct additions i b+ Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare cit W�th= drawals, d,, through InterfpTence with, 3 or eneangered species Of plants? .ar, aquifr_r? quality? - .> .. quantity? f 3 h. The reduction in the amount ox water other- wise ava-ilable for public water jl supplies? i L. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding i—• , or seiches? 3. ei- ualitF< Tai11 tile. !x uposal b : 1 a significant r results 3n: e a. Constant or periodic air emissions from voblle / or indirect-sources? J Stationary,sources ?r.;: --. b. Detarioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attniment`of applicable air quality standards? � I C. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movemert, moisture oa temperature? n< 4. Riots Flora Will the Proposal have significant results f a. Change in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or number Of any "species of plants ?,: i b+ Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare j or eneangered species Of plants? Y ` ?age 3 YES .'11kYBE C c. Lntroductinn of new or disruptive species of slants into an area? y d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? (r sauna. Will the proposal•have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of sA =cies, including diversity, distribution; or numbers of any species of animals? b„ Reduction`of, the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? ,= C. Introduction of nevrfor disruptive species of animal's into. an are or result in a barrier to the migration os movement of animals ?' `. d. Deterioration or rkaoval of existing .fish or wl,ldlife habitat? `i. Ponulat::ote. Will the iroposal have significant results in: T t; a. Will `the proposal - alter the location, distri I1 butirin, density, 'diversit 3. or growth rate of the human population, of an _area? ' b• Will the proposal affect existing housinq,.or create a demand for ;additional housing ?.. 6. Socio- EconomicYgactors. Will the proposal have sign?.iicant ra.% is ian a. Change in locei or regional socla-eronomi�c ..� characteristics, including econo -aid or commercia'; diversity, 4ax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably c-;stri-bur,d among praject beneficiaries, i.e;, buyes, tax payers or project users? 7. .Land Use 1d Planning Considera ns.. Will the proposal have significant results in? a -_ 'A substantial alteration of the rese p at or -'� planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designatisns, objectives, policies, ' or adopted plans of any governmental ' entities? C, An impsct upon the qulaity or gvantity of `r :xistng consumptir_'or nan- consumptive recreat$ anal opportunities? �1 r� , YES MAni $. Transoortation ,• krill the proposal have significant - Z i. Al ` result in? k a. Generation of su_b. stantial additional vehicular movemeat? f b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for � *" new street construction? C. Effects on ex3:'sting parkia9 facilities, or % iemand for new f i parking? , d•- ,SubsE'antiah impact upon existing transporta- 1,ion systems? e. Alterations to"present pattesnsJof circula- "tion ! or movement of „people and /or good's? J. f• Alterations to or effects on present and potential water- borne, rail, mass traa'st'or air traffic? f/ x* X1 ak g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehfcles,_ bicycYsts r or pedestrians? t 9. Cultural Resources. Wi1J, the proposal have significant o results in: a.. A disturbance to- -the ::ntrmg-rity of archaeological, F t= paleontological, and /or historiOa resources? 10. Health, safety and Nnisance^ Pastors, Will the Fraposal, have significant results in: a> Creation of any health hazarc or potential ::ealth hazard? '•• b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards ?. c• -A risk of explosion or release of hazardous _ substances in the event of an accident? 1 d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms” r' e. Increasa in 'existing noise leirels? r f. Exposure of pecple',o potentially dangerous = noise levels ? g• The creation of cbjectionable odors? h: An increase in light or glare? d page S j YES, \0 '9 AIL "iI. Aesthetics. Will the troposal have significant results in: a`.' The obstruction or degradation of`snp scenic vista or view? j' b. The creation of an aestheticzlly offensive !l site? l c. A conflict with the objective of designated h or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Pubkic Services.. 'Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the. followings A. Electric pcezer ?' U_ Natural or packaged gas? C. Communications systems? d. Water supply' 1 --X e• Wastewater faci'ties? f• Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? i. Police protection? 3• Schools? ' t k. Parks or other recrearional facilities? I. Maintenance of public £acilities,'including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? 13. EnerrV and Scarce Resa,rces. 13111 the proposal have z- gnifican` in" results a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? I r` b. .Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development of new sourites of energy? d.- An increase or perpetuation of the cojj&=prjon of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable source$* of energy are available? 7 � i L _ \ A. C� +. YES e. Subsganrial `geplEkion of axe nanreneux scar9,e4�niatural resource? i hle or x 14. Mandatorr'EindinRS o� Sie�ifiea„nd(f IT, - e, Does":the projca, have the tt3e uali Pccettial to degrade 4 tp ?f ahg environment, substanxially reduce tie iiab%tat ;af fish' or wild spe,;ies, cause a fish ozSwil,' °'popnlatan4idr >ip beloir self° sutainn� level s, threaten ' Co elicunate a pAant 6 ndmal tommouityy reduce the number 'or reqt'tyict, ti ie range of a rare or en plant` oR`agfta7,`ox eliainate " important= exempjes .of tea major periods of j Cali@Q'rnia h :c c. 7 ,or prehis ory? b- Does the project nave the potential to a short - term,, to the dil -sadv ntage of long- tesmU� environmental goals? (A short -term, impact on ,tfie environment is one whicb'pOccurs in a rely *,ive[y 1 � brief, definitive p -3ad Of" time while lung- term impacts :will. endure well' into the future). c Does the project hove impacts which are r individually 13mited, 'but cumula7�,vely considcrab�;.? (Cumu�j&tiwely cinsiderable means that the incromentzl ef£e.ts of an individual g ojeet a-e sonsiderajle wten viewed in connection with the effects o'ipast projects; and probable future projects). d. Does the project have enviremneltal effects which will cause substantial adverse -affeeats .� on human beings, either drectly or indirectly? ` II. DISCUSSIGIS GF' ENl*IRO*I+i£ lTsSL EVAtdATION the above question's (i.e., of affirmative anSwe_rs to plus a discussion -111�proposed nitigatic measure,). ' "_ q e Ill .j rirIO � f x e {t 1 -1.�J ItgF# 3 ai the` as3 ih�i�s itaiAal h.„ua+luatlon: ,?� r r ' ,T ,find the p aj` a ra eft CQL`LD NOT �have. "af } oa the envzaen and I�EG�1I<<ESm "cr a» e£at ,' s s IT DSCI.MTZOI] tJiIt btRptepa ed �r`" n" +" I tihda'tiia�c autfazgh .the�psapoed �o of ecto �Qt :cauld havea signs ^feint �t eRnanme t, eheze will nod ba; a s3 n cat3,erecr r° 3n ti.is caserbe�auste a Yat' ,y awn +MqA u es, desc ibe�,�,% ar} r6 tatche seer hare: rf�een', added .to thz :,paa ect A .N fl '' PEI) -, - the pia3os?d x '. ;er�t J L e 4Y'. have. a signif:Lcagt ei eat ,i n the " gwit' ,d • a� envy, naenG�, aIId• aSs ENVTRDN`�T� 'Lxff"�CT 'REPORT' 3s, � + Date Title f-, it ,r yti J�.iy$LC.s3w37l7LSr. «.5err .a..w. n = `w " RESOLUTION NO. A R SOCUT ON 4 THE RANCHO' CUCAMONGA PILANNIN * COMMISSIDN .. APPROYSNG pEY1OPMENT RU4EW NO. 485-44, L OCATED" AT; -,. THE _ r SOUTHEAST' . COMES- OF LUCAS RANCH \ 00 n STREET IN SUBAREA 5 OF THE!.; OUSTRIAC a?ECIFIC iI l 0 WHEREAS,, ors ,�y6 � 30th day of NbveMber, 1985,' a. complete --application was filed Oy Steven k for review of thee, above described pebjec 7 area \ 'j WHEREAS, on the 26ti, day. of February, 1986,-ft-he Txanahc' Cucamonga Planning- r�mmmission h04 a meeting -to consider the above inscribed prnsec *: j NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resalwed as ollowsz SECTION I; That the following can he: met: 1. That the proposer pt feet is consti� tent with the .: objectives of tne'Gei�eral .lan and 2. That the, proposed, use is in accord with the objective .,of the. Devel4Pment Code end the purposes of the distriCt in whilch th• site iss-1 +0o4l and 31. That the proposed use d_�i compliance with each a+.' the applicable provisions of the Devplapmert Cade; Il ` and t\` " 4. That the proposed uses together, with the conditions ' applicable ther "o, w1Tl,npt .be detr;mentai :to the {� public health, safety, or, �.Afare, or mi'terially injurious to" properties or #mproveme►ts in the vicinity. , SECTION 2- -', That -this project will not create adverse impacts on-the environment -a' no r_fi'at a Negative DeclariM an is 'issued an Febe-uery .26, 1996; SECTION 3: Tha-t Developw�en't Review yltn. 8S -44 is approved s±rbject to the fallowing con3i:tion; and attar-bed Standard ;,ondit or:s,.t DESIGN REVIEW. ` 1, the master plan shall be revised to provile common (shared) plaza areas /open spaces witn "Sidewalk connections between parcels. The reused master plan shall be ap:,tofved by the Design Review Committee prior to issAance of building permits for f'y [ DevolopMEat Review 85-44. lY A. c ATTEST: Brad Butler, ueputy `ecrei ary I, Orad Burp k.: puty Secretary of the Planning . brntission of the city of Rancho Cucamony4, 4? hereby certify that the Svregoing;Resolution was duly and regulp':sty introduced, p-csed, and ii ptud by the Punning Commission of the City of Ranu` o Cucamongu, a> a regular- meeting of the Plar!ning'l±omyr ssion held on the 26th c:.: = of February,: 1986, by the following vote -to -wi : : AYES: COMMIS'al:�'!ERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: V' ABSENT: COMISSIONEFS: �f PLA ►itIrNGz CQMMI IONS 7;TION R 26,, 19.8b�` '� r'ei.ruary DR 8r —t4 - Falk -,. ' Page z" 2. &.ployee . pl:aza drni'ls shall be a ma i,mum of°r 40D sgctau feet in s��e, shall rclu3e benuhes., trash receptacles, sty= `: "trees and other, ,similar, amenities subject to the City Planners approval, 3. Windows shad be dark tinted glass and,the bcilding accent cohgr slate gray: x :; 4 Bicycle storage fadljt$as shall 'tie" provided bier they city PTanpers approvat.' s _,ENGINEERING: L. A lot line adjustment combining .parcel s 1 2 shall be completgd'pRor to issuance of a budding °p'ehmat. 2� Existing overhead uti11 ti es or, the so�!Vi ' stde of 6th Street from the first power p:Olp west of " L;cas Ranch Road to the first power;,pole east of the easterly property line shall be _placed under ground and the poles removed at , the developers elpense a prior V�- issuance of an occupancy permit. 3 APPROVE1 O AND AD0PTFD THIS 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANriD CUC,4MONGA 1 BY: -. Dennis L." u , Chai irman �I ATTEST: Brad Butler, ueputy `ecrei ary I, Orad Burp k.: puty Secretary of the Planning . brntission of the city of Rancho Cucamony4, 4? hereby certify that the Svregoing;Resolution was duly and regulp':sty introduced, p-csed, and ii ptud by the Punning Commission of the City of Ranu` o Cucamongu, a> a regular- meeting of the Plar!ning'l±omyr ssion held on the 26th c:.: = of February,: 1986, by the following vote -to -wi : : AYES: COMMIS'al:�'!ERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: V' ABSENT: COMISSIONEFS: �f �Z� l ^, rNL•Q L if ip Y> U r cLa {Y. N dg ag .q Lw �mr*r °n.V °'. soY.o ,�J T.o° a��GZ.G t �' � a q.. -atY nY• era �� co. � €�� - L rG� nV u g. of ? a f -.c D V, C1'�gR 4P °1 .EibO �N n 'aY o7 940My .2i EAN p 44 ?Y E U •O GWa" �: '� S.r 3 c L i 0 UE'L r.'Y 9 �..6 2 2 q� E C G °� N^ u4> i ; S mg 3 L OOO. po LO� vn.aA LgNE�. p'EEVLY °o LC G Y..rOC�i i� 9 ^� >K �L gU^'4d4 cya �y�c�ts a.w. F N 9R:LA oEt p� ��vLpd = '.p G � L69.�d Rd yE Rd DE1 Y O Ec$€ HI L¢ V V G EQrr p y 4p YR. Via! 4 W cu E C Y E_R O. Y Lt t �o y ?u mid aF L+ca L �, �r x Y N N �- O4 dy Q V r w R uV L�Yg692N .RFC.. P•pGJ3N C�.M CNT 4'43 Qs O.oN ,c -D.m cDy ILL GL4,6V 1 Aerte{ art, w N Y. ova'�TN n 9 OO ^ US o Ei p •y N� U Y� "fit Oip Vc L R T3� EcOaad • W c�II. rY O dvi c ,� 4 L c p VVV y R i W ..and ^Y. C uu yUV� a o O r i D O U Y v •. �'1'�✓ v 6 L ., i D C ° D.': E D'V Y"..O `` p3� -oak a' 4 •N. D.. =U 1-d SwSN¢.nt��� A N R N o y n N O ° E d q rFdN nw o pxu vc`u'6 wydq. CC;X u c y3 gg8i�^ CCU a� a.= C L O q d p N N�0 dOJt.d O< ET � u IM1V � O q W E 5 a^ C �:p. wawa a,,. q^ V ~C V 9 Yd Vr 66 ++ dir Cunt V 13 HN.NL i da =N LyC `�C yA N.L i J W c WY y� YO�C dAa. tOJ O1D a1°O. �yp..'p0 as -„ uEyY',n .� ~3'S:5 ^Ng Cy YO >? CD .- o aFi a C M ae L v..° fi �0 G .2x L'D° C�°•C N�". ^+e Uy. a°+q. 3N �� ^36 C.iS •. 621 .wo IA GTy. 3NdlJ N 4Y.NH w...-•:3 L, aCCC �i•MCL,pYN ^A q V2N�91.q iW �«aN u tio0. 2dO y^ W C'^ a ,- u 0.Q N E J T `a a� ;o °. 1°•a p• VgCa qY O 4 W.dO V'w� � rCE N-p ^u 3w�na9 •� =tea+ ?•• u$u a a.. � t=ua a. ^4 o � y d E... A24 b y YN�CL ruO ua. ° ca ziux 3vu L ��°' Nap, - Ly aJ C y >.L q�r r4 LX >a LOL l q cIV -o94 JT N v uc� U�:..aAY N� dCW9ci0 779- aim me nc 9.. ... o E yyr U d D.~ 9q v L S. C ~^ q.3 j c¢WO a L J 4VUwC b� �p GWY yC a � SlP�C Ea9 C Oy ° �1 ~p a a^'u > 3 EX U L Eo O yuA n� r Llec01 a W.N L >i� OVd NUC YL �y0'4LL d.NCL n. a i- •y-Npq GI-Nd Nq4 Ku J:Y'°6VuM X _ 5 J J C E ° L '44 Y OS 3 R N N p Y U °i N L gyp a E No q nn ,nW c 9 a °r coXN a: C c.qE. >DOy c3.;yo� q' gCrd E °Y 9 DI.0 C L.0 4 .crE Cy N y c E 2 5 y : VQ �C G4 '°"y yYY v .o ,r,�Ww vm,oL,s W N Cpl Np:N' J 1. LJ 9-3 CE pOT.° V i �< Y N Y np ins as o,eJO.. a ac a L L' 1p -r N N 4.0 �.. _ _ d dq 1 ^ ^. wq y y> 1 N4 M M4alpol e e+Q aCCC �i•MCL,pYN ^A q V2N�91.q iW �«aN u tio0. 2dO y^ W C'^ a ,- u 0.Q N E J T `a a� ;o °. 1°•a p• VgCa qY O 4 W.dO V'w� � rCE N-p ^u 3w�na9 •� =tea+ ?•• u$u a a.. � t=ua a. ^4 o � y d E... A24 b y YN�CL ruO ua. ° ca ziux 3vu L ��°' Nap, - Ly aJ C y >.L q�r r4 LX >a LOL l q cIV -o94 JT N v uc� U�:..aAY N� dCW9ci0 779- aim me nc 9.. ... o E yyr U d D.~ 9q v L S. C ~^ q.3 j c¢WO a L J 4VUwC b� �p GWY yC a � SlP�C Ea9 C Oy ° �1 ~p a a^'u > 3 EX U L Eo O yuA n� r Llec01 a W.N L >i� OVd NUC YL �y0'4LL d.NCL n. a i- •y-Npq GI-Nd Nq4 Ku J:Y'°6VuM X _ 5 J J C E ° L '44 Y OS 3 R N N p Y U °i N L gyp a E No q nn ,nW c 9 a °r coXN a: C c.qE. >DOy c3.;yo� q' gCrd E °Y 9 DI.0 C L.0 4 .crE Cy N y c E 2 5 y : VQ �C G4 '°"y yYY v .o ,r,�Ww vm,oL,s W N Cpl Np:N' J 1. LJ 9-3 CE pOT.° V i �< Y N Y np ins X _ 5 J J C E ° L '44 Y OS 3 R N N p Y U °i N L gyp a E No q nn ,nW c 9 a °r coXN a: C c.qE. >DOy c3.;yo� q' gCrd E °Y 9 DI.0 C L.0 4 .crE Cy N y c E 2 5 y : VQ �C G4 '°"y yYY v .o ,r,�Ww vm,oL,s W N Cpl Np:N' J 1. LJ 9-3 CE pOT.° V i �< Y N Y np ins j F oae.,o- o '� nom° L... yt.. m. e. an -o N. o.`u +L.°.. ni° syA c ~' r+°. � o ,'•e Lf� N °°�' u' �.. mu. pv c id c1O'N''v. ,n o c N +.�....• lie— _ CV1 nN q q N Gr G y� d a d 0 QM 4 d Lu G G L C r y F. O. 4 ms ,= n w .CIY0 6d n ENP Ed L d .HGL.+. G €u qNr� q:'H SNG l�-N.0 G'N 1a1.- ..�9k >D��a Nn.D Tn� s•d O.O d G10"n 06. CV It ON nw. `J••J. G 2 d N q G d bU N •^�_ q pot ._odw �•�- �% L.e °. m = ^m ^ r F SIR d oy 3a c -� q uq su &-% q p �n G d °uu° E L� 0 grnrJc. 6` p A N ' : �. .M C ;.^ � 'p' N �• � y � Y° Y N O 64 ✓°' d C m p �. O u d p S. L �r a�.. T C Y q 0 Y p ♦ y r d C N 'C y. r. r C a •� ^O N.dCM n C 6� �uG w.N Uc Laa v a b:CU.s d _ nc u`op° q d5 N4 j F oae.,o- o '� nom° L... yt.. m. e. an -o N. o.`u +L.°.. ni° syA c ~' r+°. � o ,'•e Lf� N °°�' u' �.. mu. pv c id c1O'N''v. ,n o c N +.�....• lie— _ CV1 nN q q N Gr G y� d a d 0 QM 4 d Lu G G L C r y F. O. 4 ms ,= n w .CIY0 6d n ENP Ed L d .HGL.+. G €u qNr� q:'H SNG l�-N.0 G'N 1a1.- ..�9k >D��a Nn.D Tn� s•d O.O d G10"n 06. CV It ON nw. H N G 2 d N V N t � E3L �L a L dMb _ n Ad b ?a hA vv ui H d q.OA N y ��A E y d d �r o o N n n r C +^ C ,nE+ b f� 'ac a a f' p a+�docc TTn E sF a d Lu G G L C r y F. O. 4 n w .CIY0 6d n d Cn..d H N G 2 d N q G d bU N pld r pot 2 c �y y wA.. u Ny VaFF Gw .M C ;.^ Ap Y'L �d q +T qO�V 4 Ey�c. L ppY pd v m L.N d y b - 'ma d ?'^ q c p ay a ° _ L_� L d q Nq d�qu LO N 'd pfp� 6 v U 6° 'r9 b. b pia C r-, OLL w V ova yG Lq �.Llty, 4lNyw c d0 :.ay LCE rGU p. CI rn cod N.°.N.. way y. d 0� LC.. NL6. np y 6nV1 . - +fd Lt qp p W6 G�1N'.•. y. r a b U .�i N Y �Uy C q LL W L O' Y6m� O °) �Qq P•o� NEB, ,^, d Z"; T a L L d C b 4� ... 1Z.1oa 1 F-6 O !p \r\u �I G i I{I .gym Ybq adb Lard �� W n6 nELLq �jad � ¢p1 uao_ gg Alk 6 C L ^dN EqA L Ly � N by: yyy m udLY pUN @n C,ry ^U 9 rq G� b q q q� E a Cb b P y a 4y d d O E q r y Sq� d Wy ppdE wNw dd O.uC EEy W N.�rU� i 0.0 L � O L m Vp 1^t1W t G �. gp.La Yd.N Sri mY.C: 4> � 6.Na 4 d .I N til. W l I, 6n� OI d Cyp • aaa h� q L L.L V NL °yn O1t'n ug A b XT Pick c° nua ` m`4q qd -�C C eroN. Gg"C LDC OS Q yU ud .2 qb do Eq ¢m EiNLgN ^ I d D L C N d E d d H -¢ p OS'••2. V ^ ^ d.N� h y .�TCaQ ��api. ppQy�.. n w4 W L yhi CN b gnbp � aQ C >E C Gb, L. Y� y4. NXP W � d C ° q E OI Of L C d C TLL TOr P TO �dN N L w V by d •^ N DE _ w�S4 wdAU �M O• r ^y L O Y b O G yy Pr-Na °u y v¢inY U WIL. W ES ddf>.V " G Ca Gh6 u u.0 x x C u Y UUd E E P PY+ptl r r� � d C b . bV . j Z Y YC° b b..�O�w r rIDH I^ SLq O OF D � �2 q ��V. 3 •: 1 i i C C dD• b qE � TAL C fl. d d ¢ ��q � ¢ P P LW> rDO G GIPq > 6W � > CCU u u.E a aq,n Z"; T a L L d C b 4� ... 1Z.1oa 1 F-6 O !p \r\u �I G i I{I .gym Ybq adb Lard �� W n6 nELLq �jad � ¢p1 uao_ gg Alk 6 C L ^dN EqA L Ly � N by: yyy m udLY pUN @n C,ry ^U 9 rq G� b q q q� E a Cb b P y a 4y d d O E q r y Sq� d Wy ppdE wNw dd O.uC EEy W N.�rU� i 0.0 L � O L m Vp 1^t1W t G �. gp.La Yd.N Sri mY.C: 4> � 6.Na 4 d .I N til. W l I, 6n� OI d Cyp • aaa h� q L L.L V NL °yn O1t'n ug A b XT Pick c° nua ` m`4q qd -�C C eroN. Gg"C LDC OS Q yU ud .2 qb do Eq ¢m EiNLgN ^ I d D L C N d E d d H -¢ p OS'••2. V ^ ^ d.N� h y .�TCaQ ��api. ppQy�.. n w4 W L yhi CN b gnbp � aQ C >E C Gb, L. Y� y4. NXP W � d C ° q E OI Of L C d C TLL TOr P TO �dN N L w V by d •^ N DE _ w�S4 wdAU �M O• r ^y L O Y b O G yy Pr-Na °u y v¢inY U WIL. W ES ddf>.V Ybq adb Lard �� W n6 nELLq �jad � ¢p1 uao_ gg Alk 6 C L ^dN EqA L Ly � N by: yyy m udLY pUN @n C,ry ^U 9 rq G� b q q q� E a Cb b P y a 4y d d O E q r y Sq� d Wy ppdE wNw dd O.uC EEy W N.�rU� i 0.0 L � O L m Vp 1^t1W t G �. gp.La Yd.N Sri mY.C: 4> � 6.Na 4 d .I N til. W l I, 6n� OI d Cyp • aaa h� q L L.L V NL °yn O1t'n ug A b XT Pick c° nua ` m`4q qd -�C C eroN. Gg"C LDC OS Q yU ud .2 qb do Eq ¢m EiNLgN ^ I d D L C N d E d d H -¢ p OS'••2. V ^ ^ d.N� h y .�TCaQ ��api. ppQy�.. n w4 W L yhi CN b gnbp � aQ C >E C Gb, L. Y� y4. NXP W � d C ° q E OI Of L C d C TLL TOr P TO �dN N L w V by d •^ N DE _ w�S4 wdAU �M O• r ^y L O Y b O G yy Pr-Na °u y v¢inY U WIL. W ES ddf>.V I, 6n� OI d Cyp • aaa h� q L L.L V NL °yn O1t'n ug A b XT Pick c° nua ` m`4q qd -�C C eroN. Gg"C LDC OS Q yU ud .2 qb do Eq ¢m EiNLgN ^ I d D L C N d E d d H -¢ p OS'••2. V ^ ^ d.N� h y .�TCaQ ��api. ppQy�.. n w4 W L yhi CN b gnbp � aQ C >E C Gb, L. Y� y4. NXP W � d C ° q E OI Of L C d C TLL TOr P TO �dN N L w V by d •^ N DE _ w�S4 wdAU �M O• r ^y L O Y b O G yy Pr-Na °u y v¢inY U WIL. W ES ddf>.V I d D L C N d E d d H -¢ p OS'••2. V ^ ^ d.N� h y .�TCaQ ��api. ppQy�.. n w4 W L yhi CN b gnbp � aQ C >E C Gb, L. Y� y4. NXP W � d C ° q E OI Of L C d C TLL TOr P TO �dN N L w V by d •^ N DE _ w�S4 wdAU �M O• r ^y L O Y b O G yy Pr-Na °u y v¢inY U WIL. W ES ddf>.V f w C Ow. N Y lZi E = L Y'"• C ro ° r L Y 9 E L � O • • 20 V' p Oro N b b �LN. < p'dL- O.. � ^ c.. i LOT 4OY YN tm �' Gd a n'L V 1 O •_,a ° o Ate. N'�6 YN CO�.R q�dY` °fib b a 7 O c' EN4Y ro A' ' P L j L EyrC C4«... aFL. YNmp dU1 L• '�.' a 1,.9 NR V � u N. 1 Y. �A C a dpL CEE q add yC a Yt• m C NN�! -/' `�Y..( LL OW .-. a�i � cE � C TT N 6 ^NLC IrIr n ... � ti � ti'O C N9 • < Cam+ >L C 4 Y •� Ili\ F 7 1 J1p� T "`` L ON Lm a LL.O. ' Yd E ylscM Y Nom@. ee � T. � •� L� O O C° 9 �'O b� C G L° y 9 p «..� r A f F Y it L °'Yp C ro sL lilO >� C9 Ovjm°� L�"'C'.gV o ^ z� E m O ��.6 Gq w YyEE ^ H CO m� �LmN. EY Oa - � i Y • r_ a E dEUm <� 9 b+Ca O y N u p O hY °nR:dO �.L 9 VI.VbN� 49roG OG Erb W Mu H O 4 _a� 3 . dd W �aoyy 4. pc i.�: r � p '" J .�. � `•,I R � NyL tiv a,�.. C w O 3 r�14 x ' 14, tlt< t -- it OdGy A,M E tl n q N b ^ S i _P N N a ° C Y e �gtlA2 Nb uqN ' ` G y� v YWC dby Y N� 64 - ® X11 1n ! �- p Sr CL. V ?' A.. y 6b n •• ° C•Y �... yxsY tl � i v u ° Fi S� - ^T ti LSL rn.0 +• C� "_ �. 1;3 Y.i ba � i NbTt O br tllr AYO. D < •i NO y. v1L � A9OV EbA NLb 6® C4 a O L EN' Y b O L E �� CC 4 ,y Etl Gy y bUN � =QN i�� Gy b�6j^ ° p E N O P Lw C ^a�iUL pM a..oa...�b N6 �. u uL °L -'•: w^ ^W u` p° GC _a 2 L O Gtlt6 tl v3 H+ G E W� fi Y� A t: L U uy fia iW > do p N6W eC9 .Or. N'Y O'Gri -i.M Y tl Wi-85 41 S' � NT< U' YY 64.e 6L^ hr %. LLU =e. V9 m 01. ti N N I•I ti Yf tp t Aft ' - c N. O� u O 5•UF O FE 3• a w L 4. O O� L my as fi0-�J a< SN ° L j " b 479 Y OC1 SZO PJ N O U tl ° C 4_ yO L tl° E a.N � Cd ► d :L _ c rL 5 J VW N L i 6NO uyjy Y M u C Cp� NG u U b?O a ^0 2 6O. C yC u Sy dp qW C� EV p ESf C , �� N t• EE b C 1.. � CT _ • Ca .- ya •� ..- U,r. - EO O� 6 rnm C �. N3 ) •ly. ttls• a a'4w. rn� tl L C O O• d 4 E O. Cp Y - w 2 O� NEEE NY 2 N aSo O� Ex au 4 � Y q K O �b L q4u .b a '.. uN t N a i» S^ d~ t 4 l Z C Y U u .•O• Y T. a W O dN 4L & WSLUtlN NK 6L V^ _j > Y V I- biU M m� 5 0 � vii y N� •�� �n � �` �4 E � 3 � 4 SE Yw i�1 f U d .O .3` L 0. q# S-= l 11 Go D Y C L o C CI L W Oz y Y. q v ' d d v L Cy tea°. Y rN L aY L ^ 4 C N 9. C� r AL G y O 4 t-9 t 'm N o i N N ^ r O d G ° G 6.0 a3 9 Y c0 Y T. y' Ga L •� d 'T N L A c •NL„'u wu y c �. 9 N r Cl: •�.. 9.9 n.- � d �n L d � d �. � �d G o LL dE °' d i L �' dt •- T 9 AG p9 d.c. ✓6 tl �'° x�. ON G i:'T o ou JN ptl u. ° yl ter. '°OU � N N $ L "...N .sd,9 ✓ NL ✓GG L CC E..d v a°i a 4 ^u +.N f. > G dV °Lna. �d LY N^ G d 4 n Uy M L .- !• L 6� Y- O.L y, ✓ ✓ �W L Hy 6O L� dC. •t 9N qQ O Yd' d i G y L A L G�d p L L o G y Iyy A9 ay. Nµ C as —21'. 4 d dp = y .l��p O1C �fja�CT.. NE N E W,,.� ...n yam..= TT n�^�° n.°. n b G d a .� �✓ ^t. ^d Ly may' ° •d O N �rC4 r » O7 p G..N•{ �.W Y.:G <G Yr 6J•°Jd 0 n ^ N Go D Y C L o C CI L W Oz y Y. q v ' d d v L Cy tea°. Y rN L aY L ^ 4 C N 9. C� r AL G y O 4 t-9 t 'm N o i N N ^ r O d G ° G 6.0 a3 9 Y c0 Y T. y' Ga L •� d 'T N L A c •NL„'u U d O °N p y c �. 9 N r Cl: •�.. 9.9 n.- � d �n L d � d �. � �d G o LL dE °' d i L �' dt •- T 9 AG 'Cy JN ptl Yy. e 'Z7 t �a^ G� _< l" �, `71 n rp CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cucnua STAFF REPORT 0 - " ... DATE: February.}26, 1986 1937 j TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, As Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR T,RACT.12830 - CITATION BUILDERS - Design j ` reviert for - ,Tract. 2830, a residential tubd:visIon of 21 Al acres in the Low Medium Residerft al District (4 -8 du /ac) into 103 lots located on the west side of Beryl Street north of Base Line Road - APN 202- 751 -40. I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 12830 was reviewed and approved by the anf nfng —Co nissfon' as a total development package on December ,12, 1984. The `applicant was the A -M Company. Since this original approval, the tentative tract map has been recorded and a grading peYmi has been issued. The A -M Company has sold their interest in k the p��oject .sit*; to Citation Builders. Citation Builders is now suLmitting site plan and aui1ding elevations fQr the consideration R„ of the Planning Commission. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of plot plan and elevations. y B. Surroundins Land Use and Zonin North Sing a family residential (Hamilton Ranch); Low Medium Residential (4 8 :a /ac). _ South - Single family residential; Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). East Single family residential; Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). West - Single family residential; Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). _ C. General.Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Medium Residential (4-8 du /ac). North - Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). South. Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). East - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). West - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). ITEM G . PLANNI(tGQIN.IIS 0 REPORT " Tract 12830 CZtat on dBu�► Cters February ;�t 198& ,: Page D. Site Characteristics: The project site 1s.` currently beang` " graded for house pads = under, the current grading issued .permit with the :T inal" tentative tract approval: c 111. ANALYSSV A. General_ This project is proposed. as a continuation ofr -the development of, the Hi l- gate.Comr�unitY. pxeduct (Tracts 1223$ and 0' 1253, located; at She northwest corner of� Church: and Hellman ` across from Cucamonga .ouhzor Htigh School. 'However, a new f'>roor �1 � plan (1251) is, being added °that is not now included as'part of � the available floor plan. for the Hili.gate" Commun.ity.. The unit models offered= as a part of this proposal are as follows: Model Floor Area* No. of Bedrooms,: No. of Stories 1251 1,251 sq. ft. 3 1439 1,439 sq. ft, 3 �I 1523 1,523 sq. ft. 3 2 (833 sq. ft. — 1st floor) 1707 1,707: so. ft. 4 "°2 a �! _ (933 sq. ft. 4 1st floor), *Living area only; does not include gare;GY A variety of building elevations arp offered with each footprint with unit architecture of a traditional, contemporary. nature. All roofing material is proposed as tile. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed " the project making no recomiendation, instead referring this item to the full" Planning Commission to consider the issues of house plotting, unit mix, and building setbacks because of the past controversy regarding this tract. , However, the Design Review Committee did offer the following direction: 1. Realign the driveways on Lots 25, 36, and 99, to eliminate a turning maneuvers within street intersections (the revised' site plan does show realignment of driveways per the direction of the Design Review Committee). 2. Providt upgrade treatments for corner side elevations and second story rear elevations that face the street. t 3. Architectural details on the front elevation should be carried out to some extent to the other three elevations. � PLANNING .CO PM'ISS10N STAFF REPORT M Tract 12850 CitaOon384ilders February 266 19$6: page 3 4. On unit 1251.8, continue, masonite siding -to other side(' of garage and wrap around to side eevati;on.. 5. On unit 121--1-C, eliminate windwall and continue masonite siding to other side of garage and wrap around to side elevation. _f , 6. For Lots`88 -103, the following items should be cons1dered., ' a. Lot 90 should be a 1 -story floor p- „in only: > b. Lots 96 and 97 have both been proposed as 2 -story E units.' One of the lots should be revised to a single: w. story floor plan. c. Protection of 'privacy for existing homes adjacent to .y the projsct site should be a major consideration; i.e., upstairs winnows of 2- story units should not have \ direct views into the rear yards of existing homsP Site line studies should be provided for Lot. d -103' for Tots proposed with 2- story floor plans ',.a show ' their relationship to existing homes adjacent ta,,the �r south. 'Y items 1 through 5 have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval. „ Item 6'involves the issue of the tract interface with the existing homes to the south which the Design Review Y Committee has referred to the Planning Commission for final " resolution. C. Site Plan Como arisons_ The Design Review Committee directed staff to present a comparative analysis between Citation's new ti proposal and the previous'�y,_approved site plan and building elevations proposed by the A -M Company as part of the original tentative tract approval back in 1984. Brieflya; -the approved design of the A -M Company shows more 2- story - houses with smaller rear yard setbacks plotted on Lots 88 -103 adjacent to existing homes to the south than does the new proposal by Citation. The,•new proposal is certainly Tess impactive and would be an improvement over the approved plan. However, with the project, as proposed, there would still be impacts'-to houses to the south resulting from the plotting of 2- story, houses that could be mitigated by restricting _house plots to single - stury models only. For a detailed analyst?.,- of the site plan comparisons, please refer to attachments D. Site Line Studies: The Design Review Committee requested that the applicant smit site line studies indicating relationships of all 2 -story units plotted on Lots 188 -103 to the adjacent houses to the south. The Design Review Committee indicated' k PLANNINF 60MISS"10 SIA�F REP"�,c�r mac% 12838; - ita,'tion 6uilder�s' -_ )� February 26 1986' Page 4 inion, that in their ,,.o upstairs windows of 2Ms�iory unit, should not have di.reec views, into the rear yards of these existing. ' � homes. The submitted site line studies indicate that for Lots j 91, .84, and 96, views from second story windows would have direct access :into adjacent lots to the south. Based on the s criteria established at the Design Review Committee meeting, it is recommended that Only 1- story units be plotted on Lots 88- 97. , E. Neighborhood l tputkt A neighborhood meeting�, was held between The project' developer and local surroundii2q residents on `q January 6, 1986. At this meeting, residents voiced concern that house pads at the southern perimeter of the tract adj,acer% to their ewq lots were significantly higher than theirs and would greatly '-impaot both their views and privacy. The developer responded that.he� has valid grading parmi°ts issued by the City and that he has been grading, the site to the approved plans. Staff indicated -to the residents that grading of, the tract had Or been approved, but that other methods exist to minimize /,.the impacts to their homes such as by ,controlling bout the .ny,nber of stories of units plotted on these lots and the rear ,hard setbacks from these new houses to the''tammon property .iine. The following issues were identified and resolved at this meeting as follow,,: 1. The perimeter wall along the southerly tract boundary 1.s to I be built pet! the agreed upon design :with the A -M Company: This design includes a 6 foot wall, 4 1/2 feet of which will be masonry block construction with the top 18 inches to be wrought iron (see Exhibit "N "). 2. The storm drain easement (Lot "A") is to be walled off to prevent through access to the south. Walls should be of a Oil similar design as the southerly perimeter tract wall, A wrought iron gate access to Lot A is to be provided with tha interior of the easement to be landscaped. °I IV. FACTS FDR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to consider approval, the following findings must be made: it 1. That this project is consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan, j 2. That this project will not be detrimental ;!Co adjacent ?' properties or cause significant environmental impacts.; and *' 3. that the proposed use and site plan, Together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City ,. Standards. i ! F2b 6 a�2, Pale 5' X `A4 V. CORRESPONDENCE� 'Although'- this is pot a "'!public i?eafing Ctem ., {A ette� r a;V,e�e�r►,'vnaileK to .all meets .mo tie L�aQrne �e \��I �ieighbox�i ritendance at the­ i ood me2tn4. whole Ief �hei�r �- nam�s an z addr sesp on'the fu n sh �,ma�iT -ing hst. W. REr fE�JDAtI"rtONa� Staff recommeyhds t�ia � the Plann�n;g Cori inn coasir et' x1 ate^al in a ardI th s< ra a nth <e Cammissn h ge r ya ltbh t o Facts °Ao� °Windup pang of ° PProva]; ado ��on . o� the °a•, Cached �Reso1uti"on r?ould $e� i Res ectfully subm 4l °ed, V ♦ � Y ,� 4 Jar° Brad Buller City Planner x, BB*BC:ns Attachments: l Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B "'- Sub fvislon -Map Exhibit "C" - Proposed Site Plan - Citation Exhibit "D" Proposed Floor Plans /Building Ele4ations - Citation Exhibit "E" Approved S*i Plian - A -M CCompany Exhibit "IF" - Approved Flaor Plans /Building Elevations - A- M'Co. Exhibit - Sight Line Studies Exhibit Block Wall Design - Southerly Tract Perimeter Exhibit "I",-- -«Site Pian Comparisons - Citation & A -M Company Resoluti ," �o: b4 -140 1 Letter of /Notification tt, Adjacent Residents Resolution of Approval with Conditions U W n i { �C!!CA3i�t CITY OF RANCHO CLrA1,i101NGA, title; �h Z ENGINEERING DIVISION g'' ,4r VICINITY MAP Page If A is I . fi. r•• ,,, 1wY r /•d. �} Y 6` 5i !1 Nt I.dd dt " '3 Le Ye t• k. A • t.* � as t+ {�a , • N:. � ,a� �` +'Z ..i t +« 4 Fs�i . .iw .n n.t, Y e AYrM 1r+h }} i, �� �' ..� w •M1.' FS .I n i.w a.it i —.FS .'L � ��Iy r «.r r �'z� 4 � `� � I � 1I ; I � � I " � �'%SM F. � «� iu�l s t ( •'� s � 7t � y✓ ' it' l •T1 q s " s o f �j I I� s :±X � r q L r t°y„ !_ . 4^ ..r ' A f� � ��... '�^�asx�.: -.,"" • .._...,tai_ ..�•i'�' � • �� Nt � � .N .� • � � w n ew w pl.� * w� '�4 i � tj �yt t � 1 `tl� p �1 It tl M �kl 4i. It �, p • " «er .t r,r arr rev. YI rr .`j..✓, r•r .j(L .. N •.:.xt ...sL '.eC. k A Mlt U �1 y"' V NORTH CI TY OF ITEII: T C�.�0 � GA T]TLE : RANCHO CL s� xus� PLANNING DIVISION E.Xl iIBrr. SCALE: n M� a�'. ? t;; a I+ a•; 6- +1_.,��*"' Md iii? �� �, iii i ` t�Cl � e.:«��'1�• y,o P : .. CIA Flo AV �a Ij MIN Hall; i E °ai �Fi ix ziEin !:1" s fill gg�:1� ;918,�b 3 ! � rn3aja (q'i�'6y�s�z�•f�rY ., °'rg ;j't� .s ! C:.i �� �a`c. 3iE!%lil:� -'• 5'� �# �$"':.!' -�3. °5 e i •�• ai c �z; s �: ;4ns s;ssz saz' ^z „ .4�iv, G: ti. y "°' r � aS+itiF ; d.. •..'i�' 1z �� 1� In 1 � 19.E c �� R{" FU IA •! ort amt � + q .{ ,a t - 4._-1 � off !. � z r e • ° �^ � •iii 'i .dtf; �� ..4 I. uj �! W in uo 0 amempe :pa9mo�ppapppp�$ �¢aapaY. °s " .� Map ¢ C�pEaoptfugp ¢ ctiv a�ppp piopemnsppyypupNy NppnpplpY(CNp�9 mp°npaggooanq Gagaptl¢tlN¢tl¢tl»Bp ■ �NpppApppONpaapq nc��iapotl�ipuaq�is� qap¢ ¢ppmppwggv i •�• ai c �z; s �: ;4ns s;ssz saz' ^z „ .4�iv, G: ti. y "°' r � aS+itiF ; d.. •..'i�' 1z �� 1� In 1 � 19.E c �� R{" FU IA •! ort amt � + q .{ ,a t - 4._-1 � off !. � z r e • ° �^ � •iii 'i .dtf; �� ..4 I. uj �! W in uo { 04 -W, ' t J,•i a'� } 31 . CLUJ it IS �•. ( Yom. it ty r lug Tv LU rx LL CC� s (t t t I �.�' t • f � ' R� a� � R=' 2 � •� m � t�- .a LAI IF . f it �' t i �gg¢ ` •�� � _ � 'S7`µ _ � ` I W w ! 7 ;k. rl i i a LU i LL fi�ivJ 'u 1 t.d 3 '_ ♦Ykr: y .1} " j •tnj� {!$l {u R (:�r+°S Y�` — a t \•—ill ,��' � L . r ;�� �, '9 i 1 1 1 a % 41. $ 1, pd M 1 •-r t } + � ' ! t 1. y1 (�y f •h' 1 t 1••i. •t�li �1 f� ) r .j� k� � S r. t.t *� U `•f.• � � �r .� r tY�it i M �� tk � .1 �:'� �i H,•F�r,ij x7 .. yti ` r• + Lt A' 7f�.!' ' > ♦J d {'+. M L y 7. a YIYI., �`ij R''( �1 1 .�.nj L � 4J t i a 11 t � � �Y (33 N•� TZ •`n FiujtG :.�. � ft 4 1 s l• .�rl 3 � . � t \ v, r i F '�.�rwl 4441lyr 1- �l"•1 `� r• - 1 'I ,t, � YS �' TI r �4. , 4t• t { ! ,,. + ;..Y 1 5 'IvX "i• t i y 1 , t • 4k� jl b� `�a\ ` � � ��� M1C 1 " tiY � � rf 1 ri t �A = ^t �tt � ) 1' `.d� �• ' y♦ � �• 1 f tr1C •111 � R fi Ui ul d C i1e > f lrl(IiF 1� {Y 2 roa ._. ' ,.,. jib --= -_ _ -� — .�.► °� � �'; Al { - haw i ^+., _.- r+•*•Gr:f'.�..�.�b '��.r.. r r•, _ � _ �� = � mss' *u � _ - - tea" � � t• �� Q'ol Fc. ro .•; Ti =io whti iii a `rj21 �} iK� IM. ,: C 1 a j�pyj�as I • - t'r' ` i !'P rte;++ SUM s LLJ fiIR ll lei- rinmRp a, t►tit i� � � ' - .�u:.s --tom• � :" �,:.....-=.: .of'��:.,.� ^_:+:.'�.'.n..,—'•'. "�- -` -`'- , .. •.. ._ :,, :, - •� �~(�' ~I T� ��1'd � Win: ih•.•.. ri fe; � ta}�3 ;i J'C� • ao. In ` Ti1 4 Z I .. 41� 1�}'. � t. 3„.c,���4• a � � P.�'^�•- �.nw�t � 9 ` 1$$`yY VT Oft CL r ..cc Oli • ` 33 rl ME un • 5 M 4� e �{ r FI ! — LL 1 ME, III g J R R it a j a 1 s T i t f � , • -J� ��� •�'Y 4. •s°•.11- —hJ ,kY � , —wa.r3 >,. __ _ • r.!.,"�����r.�. _ - .•.r�_. `?EI`.�"e: `.`,�.�'C9111'1'F3' --��` 2:: ^f � • a f.1- kt3rt.1. .:f' a. = ..._.l�f� ..I• v VIII II 11� /.'- LJi — LLJ- �ppp�f' � � tr � t � � ' ' • it El tj c � i� — �❑ �t'� I � I �I• yTif ji t �:s'- 'ty,".rii� �`it` � •-•(,. ''`1�..'r I..s. F•L .+. - t..- y � e'�.�a� �.,. '�..'rT��l;�� , -il!s_M -� •fir. Sry'S'.� 3!'G'ts 5.1 l Rg ki t1 6-F Iii - _ .. qt� at it ld t�i Y i ,v l `z 4 a ED `-'� ?• �.�•- F � � � »` Ott—" tc =�' � L ��� k , % l7' i v �tJ 10.11° ic(s�ar p� E7 -` Q,y k J } ,?.,, *ice. .• \ •, � ` ' 1• - �+ � �. 7 a-,Gz3c 6 i gr � tz sit W -' r r d ��� -. .;y r r..'. -, +..•\i ;.- i. ,.+ems s- � +�_ •fi «� � ".i �, t�. V . ..•, i .0 ..r i.j i.� tin -e4+ ♦ re'.s 9n aai�' `� , �.T� -. it Ir.. =-li •i rY.r- -f . . � '% � .. Mx ��� � � - • - ;fie . .. - � .. ..... _ � - -- �i t t I it - .�. �= C a - 3. M+�;i -i r_�� ,i i` ti :;. r.'= ��� .... >... 3• . Y �. Z.� r .y a.�. , ... Y iii1+*�aii.�� t EX � �u u �'"�} I 1 t ' it ;. . LL EB � fx PIT t- "'^',�. '"T,,^N.'.`"s.L.P.9J�v, s°q""''`r ..G'...'r ^'vT ��. r FF.'7•S�V Yy�:,a,fia-���- r -cya.. ;•,S <p_ st ! t 0 =k z> E M- r s a1a, _ �tw sC X v1- 2 i ,` 8� w 4 sa [ Q t 4,L ! :, B � , m m d CN fi Mel �I 0=11 f mot: — i p❑ x I OCR v 4 I OF I t f� 3 _ o ., Q 4 L ri _ a • 1 M �• a j s i a 1t ; 1 n, r 1 IF 1 cc 1 n, r ®1 11' 1 111 U moll 45 LU CLLU tz -71 'ar 1 . 7 ja ja r- - auj ES 111... --- C •C � � . � C . C2.71J '� .,,,,� t I ti V r t..u. �• T P!! sy_ _sA141..� ��- - s�' ` i ... '�k. , r I ❑» o - �.. � 1. �> a _�... .► �!• ME. UP ❑ - t� � }..Ye, -rte i•3a•S�� 1 .Q � '.1 � .. � i.. ) t - - �jfpc�� - p����b, j('1iF r '-! +... �.,,�L. •rpr .t_. � .+Fay} , ' F - 1Zuat'� nitre 1 A z y V— E1 ' :x I1CIf q I Rt t ` 113 aF w F�F LI Fs V 1 Q t 'n 4 01 ;or.� 11 r" 1 ,t; � t`, ,��� r �° ` s " �'� • rte-° 6. g_r.�yt "� rz 1 s --r 1 I 6-3D t .S s .i Il! iiti �ii i� I= i _.I iI F S j 1 1 �f is ^}-uz :' t'� ,� . f ;�� 4 ik / 7. i JAIL NN It r 1 f� gev, e f IN .! _ i A 1. ' i � .ESiI .A..•� � � x !, _,...... R z V p g � erg `a f t O Z -. �` ♦tSyA1 ._... ....... Id If ��1 +� ��; vc^ �( +p, :ryY w 'e`� ="n 5�n[� "� -". f°P4"�41:°'!i'�T f•-•T�y3 a R }� ut+�uunrrr "[lVk1 �O 8L,', fiHNQSV{y M3N' 3LS WUMNS3tl _ 39NEWuo VM JN11 FYI v + y t =' 4 IJ I M' fs •z S ai Fq .•i n t , r 019 0 i Agft x733PIX3 --LOU ;�,. S3IaVn N! N13H�01F1�JIHN iViOi ,nvm!oNIN I } pares `�► w'r 1.. 4 �� .. u 4' a� rnr V Mf ;, a M{ 1 1---+APPROV UMMSHED GRADE StYE le ' f _ ausYUac r- aQ�rvaa . `q� • . t SE CTION w-'A` �C cr- lr SITE PLAN COMPARISONS floor Plans: The floor plans compare for,the 2 proposals as follows: CITATION BUILDERS A-M COMPANY Model Stories Model Sq. Ft.3 Stories 1251 1,657 1 1,582 2 1 880) 702)2 1439 1,900 1 2 1,688 1 1523 1,989' 2 3 1,840 2 95O)l WJ2 8§0)2 1707 2 131 2 4 1,946 2 1:414)1- (1,166)1 717)2� )2 780 Ilst Floor Square Footage 22nd Floor Square Footage �Includes Total Square Footage! - Living,,Area Garage 2. Unit Mix- Both proposalsy show an approximate�( even distribution cif their f ur floor plans thfbughou-'�,( the, project site. Since'the approved 4V unit mix for the A-M Corioany int�ludad three 2-story units and just a single.1-story floor pl,'A n, approx� I imately 75% of their units as plotted were 2-story. With Cit[ation Builder , their approved floor plans show two 2-storly units and �'Awo I-Siorys units. Therefore, there is an approximate equal distribut-ion 6f 2-story houses to 1-story houses. Of primary conCern., are the plotting of Lots 88-103. These are the lots at the southern peHmeter of the tract that are-�adjacent to the existing homes to the south, In the. design of this new tract, sensitivity is needed on these lots to reduce their potential impacts on 'the lots to the south. The approved*plans for the A-M Company show 2-story units pl6tted on 13 of the available 16 lots. Citation Builders. has plotted only 8 2- story units on the same 16 lots. 3. Building Setbacks: Since the project site sits at a basic grade elevation that is significantly higher than the existing lots to the soitth, rear yard setbacks on lots 88-103 become critical in determining how significant the im��acts of these new �,ouses will be in relation to the existing houses i,10 the south. The 'rear yard setbac�,,s for lots plotted with 2-story un'its are as follows: A-M COMPANY CITATION Less than 30' 2 1 Less than 401 2 3 Less than 50' 4 1 More than 501 5 4 Ito) y 1 RESOLUTION _N0. 84-140` A 'RE ¢OLU iON 0` T E PLANNING COMMfSSIO�Y OF � i E C: TY .OF ,Y:OF' RANG , 0• " C iklA 0 G "q, GAL;TFOPNIIA ",`; CONDITION *L.', "A'P.P;f pYING ' TENTATIb`,RCT.p� WHEREAS„ Tentative Trae, Map,Noz 12330, hareJnafte "Mao!' submitted a 11 by ;4 -tii Company ai?p�1 4Z"ant� for he ;pu_posez of "su6d.J,V'I �z g;# ire re° ` a t ' situated" in the G "ity of Rancho ;Cucamon' a` Coynty f�` San �8c rn'a a aperof ' fog nia, described asr; a ¢bd:��v�s�"o'n of about :4 c­. 6s if to d into ,I03 Nits: ragular, y came} befo a �h`e Planniiog�*Gommis p'` aciion uh De�omberl2, X984', and' "' 6,r' , ublic caring an_`"tl i WHEREAS$; the ,dl y JP1ahn"` has venom ep�ed a proval. of the Map subject to all con'dxtIons s "et•, or h in 'the:'. Ehr4i erjng, •;ands wP!annin-g:, b vi�a�om's a ,reports; and , WHEREAS,. the Plan a , }� �g �'mm:sxSon :has .read and considered' the , Engineering and .Flanh�ngaDlvxston's rep'arts ;attd has cons�.daredother evidence presented at the p bPJJfe,.6 AH,`hg a NOW, THEREFORE- P Tan'n i qI gi Commissi "on• of t ho he Cit of Ranc Cucamonga does °resolve Is, � �f``l loWs4� „F SECTION I: The:Plannlng Commission`►iakes the followzng•fidregard to Tentative Traati 6 ings in Z' n;: Map, thereof (a) The tentative tract is oonsistent" with t;e Ge neral Plan, Development ode, aid specific plans, { (b) The.design or iaprgvements of the ton',;.tj,ve tract is E consistent -'with the Gendtlal Plans Development Code, and specif t+c plan,l,- (c) The site 'is phys.icaily suitable for the type of development.propoted4, E (d) The design of the subdivision is hat likely to cause Jl° substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious' public health problems; (f) The design of the tentativ-, tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.. (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on s the environment and a. "Negati've Declaration is Y issued. a Resplution 'Na , Page; * SEtT�Otl Tenat��e; Tract Map °Np� 128$0, attached her eI b Y, approved &s 61�ect to ai I of the f ,a� a "s and the attachQta�3rard Cj os.A; MOM- t,;.e °uf7inal� des ��c paf„ tie eke t3� a deer er�cy t a"c §s �' v ° sub+ ece t"c%� he ap rai ail f Ne C�y� PT dg en- an�d� campAletedprio ►- ttfie3map'ee'al�o S} h 4, 'WAE , AI 2. The WA ace of tWent sit ((��� 00% p dest a ci �, = " emergency�3semtx' sibe� sste_tto�es'a' the'�c�ity. e, part olio Caro i'he"riap',sy eco'i" ono r Th 3. t a e. ec �� t�_t Y �4� n,�ort�r �+« un�2tsk� on ,the ��ort�lsau<th cu ,deg sacs .sh ;:li V64'-In eased' to the sa T"s action ofl he 4 G�ty °Planrey yyyy 4. The; wall I e 19 r for" ih� er "decorei l e wail onuf eryl� �� shalt' ma es' treawal7 d� yr afr frae €"�2 "4 4'�to ane, The ,wa y fides go sfi°oh d i`nclu"�de a�mir�t�num��5� ;Vdot at they root of the c �1 de sac f.a ,inAE;8er 1 5, Where pas +stile, on fihe 'perete7^s, ;tie reta�nlntwai ^is r shall be el�tr�inated slap'e ban, s use e grade - i A drilnage Swale. shall be - provided' along' the s th Property .11.ne of 't`66 adjacent lot in th'e northeast port n ,� Of i -be site,.. .^ ' 7. Lott 103 shall drann to the street, to the satisfaction,, v the Grading Committee., in order to help reduce the , -differenceri.n grade elevation. S. The developer shall make a good faith t ��t to econttdct the surrounding residents so that a common, e walk -may be constructed along the perimeter tract prUF y lines: 9. The 26 -foot pedestrian and emergency access easementis shall include water easements to the satisfaction .of. Cucamonga County Water District. q!5 �. A 6NQUEERUG., `p Of the existing storm 'a -,ann throU�g the "" eastern ' ;• portion the prij,t t shy , confr}1. ,tp: the ',> s£�nuarc#s 1 o fi'the C tI and the Sa�nj Ba�^n4rda�no {�Flodd Conte o Dtsirticl,. The mango' ,Le pr�oposa }d o` ire ;3'1ncated �y s�lthin 3Loi' C s'fi li ;bes,'re'beated to ih� G2frtt xeet r'i.gt of,waY {� �e saisfa'ct °ofi the C:ty E`tigyi'neer: +' 2. A mo.dh� ieJ Z" W" sha311 be designed" !� d cdnstl�ructed at the na e`d of Gtdrnet Streeto "the the sa�sfact7ookiof , PPRQIIFD, AN9 �AD�OPREP, TGii� lZ,tli 6TA;Y QF DEQEt48`'cP, 1984. PLANNI , hlMiISSIO[ OF T}{ CITY OF RANGFIC tUCAMONGR T BY: Dennis �L;Y itauu- �C��rman ;y ATTEST;. � •. t Rtc� $omen, D pow ecr'etary _ r , I, Rick Gomez,., Deputy Secretary of ',the Planning Comb, scion of the Cjty Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby C?rtjfy tha'L the $gregoing of ResQi!kion was dU`ty regularly introduced, passed, and adopted jih P,anm,ng omiitission f City of Rancho Cucamonga,, and the at a regul`.ar me - aijgq;of�#1'e Planning, Cordnissi,o the on the 12th day of- 'December„ 1984, by the`fotixong vote =to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: "'MCNIEL BARKER, CHI -,"j , REM'?EL, STOUT NOES.: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE t '1 •. f mt ILK ! ff QQQ ) ��.�._.� Q w� C 4 H i• 6 � '� g b V O 41 n..P� °Q 1 4A U l,y� ..Y, fi d .'<i p 1�0. d °u ?'ca �aLwiboa � t) � �.. $M,c� ' •.'c ► Y6�q t C_p u�°+apy1 '•Cy Vii O'y° � u�'y' L�` n�um dli y r �L. m@ t P O N R et r y N t w L w C► 0 0 ••' �< .+ 1r � i k L:�N S 3p: wYuV G m Y °RRp �6. E „<. m T•n Gt ,1Sa Ob�Q 'iN ° ,s 'i °4n '\ V tda 9 .~wiq NC l /4M V ° Lpr Y tV1 .� pn. N iii aYU Y I G G G «Q C w1 :.�� `N /„i. �! N:w► '.p C V>o N a^ y?�Ry► `� C N +b S w� V uy�.'tV G °..nL c µ„ C'q" v H V u '°^`� a• p� N, y i� mi } sl ' Mh 6y V wuLO Ra yP gggb4q <.•.. �, b�d0�.. X04 � iJ •.C< aL C T� 4`L.1��em..VQ CY�..q�V w N_�� NO ►b 9 L yp0 N�y.< _ < ~ V^ a. V O V ~�a.G. OaC' <O�y ti> E Obb S gg �•V'R p p CG' °+w G Y�<` V E mt L �O ..:y'"?. °.. u n ;CYV .°d.P ,O.w.. ', • / G L.n O �_ C .w ► -m Nm Q�p� a�.N.� � _ ` w N v, H:G'Ga.R V.Vi L N v O.•. 6 Rti �. N.� N•,1.'1 4N�a<i S' rr�!! L .�. SOwO tt••��L Ln a'.1:.:•Cw RF6 pp 14. � _ P D Cam•} L �f R N 1 O `. � .�. <^ .yN oW any w..►.�M IN W• Y bT�� • � r o Q [� • �+. � Y � o C �� COI p C Y \~ 3 O E S L S' V G O <? V N w t T N.. � O u •[ L.4N s m �O 4Q�E�u vim++ [{��J�. u W r u n 4 ►°esA Ss.S Az �` � C m `a° y.. (lam l.i N q<► � �� r mY° E MN u i.Ai O F� R F*•w M.1 • u t m W : !et .+ ^. !et: ti —.2m N 1i a w v1 MP' t,,`L.. ` t cuMc$ a..o °° -ENO tee`^ •nb- 0 0 4 S V d . d •.� a L � n w V U d O w .p w. �V �.0 C�•��tl 9 ��a p� yam.° n ^.O .p n. C~ ¢ V yN �j E'er Yr w La -9 G CF w~.. d D•i £ ° "',^ wra��rd�Qy J^ dvcw wb~b, ••� ors � aar��y a^, a.. EtQ U r =L 4:aRn tea. .°d.� Gp y ° c+u 2.•,• u� qE .Q', U v." ¢NUd.. y1= >Ni SYi♦t,Y C $an3'•.N Y«c4 ♦: @u ^.G ... w.Ti :... Iz S � lla 1° O � rN• i " a Cfi C y� � °��t0 ,Te «t c -�1 NN r s ir GA L. V= sa 9 Y yN T d aM ,« r nng =i4 t_:5 o. S .0 c7 n R yaw r 0 C Y € dd L b 2 Q S.0 �' .., H Y p H C V -♦♦ 5 ap•G 4.a .°Ti E. C30 VC p« ELM,.• V6aU n^ �` tav d'L � Nn°pi, a a'Oi•i �eoa- • r S C E y 0.x R ° O N^ 6` Y ~ V O d' w V° y3 4�ni aJS i, Lam— c>k'% .•d L w. un. �M > E: V.G n °V alt a.o a-°•Lg --emu fS UW,.+ b.U°�. L° ��O Vic pC' a00.c Ju>. L0. id � 6'•,00 p e.LO 7nq E> t T dp 4 _p N11u EE _� a r Lb'i, rU Q aUAd i GLVi L1 C'_C0.p M �", 504 N`OC a C d. C A dS6C L �_.., .HOC• -: .,O ♦y ♦�. .mod u.�V u 1°i p .� Uo d=rti Ord°, L•wY •� E. "b Mir -u CE< -V • O oC >�y •y aC O'Gc � C T U � u C U ♦ °� G t _'nN V U Lgat °a Gip ��a CTa ~y � L °p,.4O �:O 'C e g Bbd a v ,,,, y •0 a ,., au. c° .T•. i c n ° L = (.t S'. t O udE y <M, °L.p rV Lfl>COb on w°, �L wQ •[ ^N,p. NqA KAY �ra]RU R�O,+.l t•C dO:.0 '..p �CO� O r�Yq 'I 1 cn x'14 sie .,Q�lq_d0 p R:C' ° �� °rain °. 3 V'O1°.L wL. a0 L y0.w Uu ., iLr Nna♦.go Gy y,+c >V A YO� wCf♦ L1SC�eai,C •°- V �'� w ^�.q. to N^ UL E a d GL Cµ - C � w b 4 E q DL Yom, 6 C o n'y° a� °. ° 3:ncs � °a' ri°Y i�.Nd. c b,°• w ¢1 Nw�l \�`Z yL°.b�0 ai y: SgWPVd wwL t. yrgg U °.� pcu� - ' Q a ,� < 0 G= r—" Y Z C A ti t,,`L.. ` t cuMc$ a..o °° -ENO tee`^ •nb- 0 0 4 S V d . d •.� a L � n w V U d O w .p w. �V �.0 C�•��tl 9 ��a p� yam.° n ^.O .p n. C~ ¢ V yN �j E'er Yr w La -9 G CF w~.. d D•i £ ° "',^ wra��rd�Qy J^ dvcw wb~b, ••� ors � aar��y a^, a.. EtQ U r =L 4:aRn tea. .°d.� Gp y ° c+u 2.•,• u� qE .Q', U v." ¢NUd.. y1= >Ni SYi♦t,Y C $an3'•.N Y«c4 ♦: @u ^.G ... w.Ti :... Iz S � lla 1° O � rN• i " a Cfi C y� � °��t0 ,Te «t c -�1 NN r s ir GA L. V= sa 9 Y yN T d aM ,« r nng =i4 t_:5 o. S .0 c7 n R yaw r 0 C Y € dd L b 2 Q S.0 �' .., H Y p H C V -♦♦ 5 ap•G 4.a .°Ti E. C30 VC p« ELM,.• V6aU n^ �` tav d'L � Nn°pi, a a'Oi•i �eoa- • r S C E y 0.x R ° O N^ 6` Y ~ V O d' w V° y3 4�ni aJS i, Lam— c>k'% .•d L w. un. �M > E: V.G n °V alt a.o a-°•Lg --emu fS UW,.+ b.U°�. L° ��O Vic pC' a00.c Ju>. L0. id � 6'•,00 p e.LO 7nq E> t T dp 4 _p N11u EE _� a r Lb'i, rU Q aUAd i GLVi L1 C'_C0.p M �", 504 N`OC a C d. C A dS6C L �_.., .HOC• -: .,O ♦y ♦�. .mod u.�V u 1°i p .� Uo d=rti Ord°, L•wY •� E. "b Mir -u CE< -V • O oC >�y •y aC O'Gc � C T U � u C U ♦ °� G t _'nN V U Lgat °a Gip ��a CTa ~y � L °p,.4O �:O 'C e g Bbd a v ,,,, y •0 a ,., au. c° .T•. i c n ° L = (.t S'. t O udE y <M, °L.p rV Lfl>COb on w°, �L wQ •[ ^N,p. NqA KAY �ra]RU R�O,+.l t•C dO:.0 '..p �CO� O r�Yq 'I 1 ti K--�l linkA 11 -qq Grn �,Z- tat! F V YC vg a =66 "bug 72 7, —Z-" 2L 2 p X;s -7; R.-; _14 2=z js,4-- 4i Mc !Z M O 13 - Z- 4 3- u,a nC at Sz; zu tl 2 5 9 . 1.1.1 q_ - 2 2 b2 Y .52 t--gz" N6 cc il1N d` 22 22 m O -qq Grn R v q t a C d & 6 Z u 4a yiQ QS� .g mV m � y u °3'°i_ YNN4w �.+ Q. dM. U Ow SOY q b:VO � G0. L._ bN ^. U`: _ •• N Y � •CNN' � d. o rya >q ^ aq b >G dO Na a4 l r7 G. ,.¢d m6 t5° •wE. V ;b. d � uLEE ar. �� ��L.1 Cw >•a°a YOLK '°:a '• M � «bVW �r ^~ ��'- C � as n° s:. C^ftp1C0. Q.. 4 ♦ dy. -�^ v= `YC aa¢�. °rNCU. YO > ^ ue 'S�S '� �u CC SDQSd..S. 3 C '1 uw�. '!0. N '.C° bf �� P"•v N� = •^Lp p,.r G yY rl G MGpt i.n > >. �•Ye bNwp6� Y Syr D p a.'o u. Om.N f.•VtYL 4j Cd 4.y 0.yi�w•uG y °� .�+py �A V °1y.�4 x � V} wq,F LV� NV WYY Sp ti�G2 N� N � L>F. °� ,C° f «�ao, 3tM.gy r 4 S YM R v q t a C r,a u 4a O .. yiQ QS� .g mV y o rya >q ^ aq b >G dO zMY E^ 6Y;4 �E q.Vy L � to V.�t ^y w L4 v O` E > ^ c • '� �u CC ?o o ¢d .c S.V S __ S E 1dr 4. yY rl G MGpt i.n bps to � � ^ �:^ a.'o u. >. o, ._ .�_ s a. ` • i m �+-° aaei o° q go° x ov_p be '"'C•ou � pii � E_v... L>F. °� ,C° � � � -� «�ao, 3tM.gy r 4 YM v R � n a, a G a C JZ L V •n � M L - r 4 y v N � C + � r u m �• � EYE v c a_ v k v 4 y c E U a r L O d m i q pYYYY 42. am 1LCNi rna � O: °' 4 4 c N9 t'os c ox __ ` 4 L 9 L .» r , Ali IV Z e.. L. b1. LY Y — G. O1 4 L q a II °t1T� N E : A d T .a. oV1F yE ` `rc.. °N� n a•vR n v �.. oNawry a °� c QCa II GOOD U .•� 6'E .sy O � q 4 � y � II•NC � q U ` '� Q I � q III`~... �` U 74 c u F O. c N C L �t u M4 E °a cc`n o='u a °c�a_ �`n � Yo`1 OyY ap ,o wII yt Vd4 ,{� _ cq `G9 w ca Q E �m 4L O� m t .Tye 60 Y •f .N • 9 K ' Om H y _ �.y .�'ft '4 to YQiM1— 6M e0 06.. _E .m. WCiLL KbUYO'ai`ro �'i S r T Y rr 4 4p Y VY 4� Vro i - 2 ti t 4F CL. U—S goic ZZ -Rz N ZZ 119 7i El , z '22 i, Vl� Sat VE r Z9 _2 -Z.E 12 5t: W4 2-N-' _tx t 'EN ,._E 2: '7Z CPA `( [.., >1 w . i9 I • �'r f ` 171' v �cu v u ' Y Ik C Y- i a °Y gs i 1 E w N u F� u ° .°. ' c .�.. 3 c } } N N E v • y 1! 'sC pY � U E r N A� pV ryry ,�� [...,.. a Y° ^Y _dam. N w� •°rte Y L ti � o > a _ii gyp. u P a :.d }. a n LO ' o' =`` •• L — N L C`v N a • 1 V°t !�L p E Y a `> N m '6 Y,N m a c u aCLZE iLgo c oX a qr a J' �U >„ y c Y > fy'�' �O y^ c v + Y° N Y E rs� icy I tU iLY. vfis Y p C; CM 6N0 4 G r C: .. • w�i Ill( �� 9I ���.. T� r � S �.� y h ¢ 9 N k 67 ., F A a•.gr �;?' J `�•A IT PT IV ANCHO t s Zka A 3taytkJon D blikels F 2 U Uacl3 `B"A_JtC11977 omuitmrm-dr m Jetfmv- hin w, 0 *4r0k4hbl v r February 19, 1986 _ v `4 -J ti Dear La Vine Street Nci;ghbar.. } ;0 Citatioi Bui lders has submitlted.,plans to the Ca t3 o bii ld ssn l fa il;+, hdmk� an 103 lot, foract�12a3R Trait 152830 `l`s a rekdn �1 `subd7i�p7or4 ., for single family homes�locate&?zbrv,t'fi& est, sjide> of Be � St6_0 -`` n0,rth�or Ba$e � �. Line Road. Ali.. p ans and files (elated to Lh�is� b�ject ale* a�i 91908-. for ,�public�revie�r and'are located iii. tFi�Fltinning -`D3 t�ioo zt& D>�Y'lfail 9 ZOnBas `Line Road. Of�`ice hours aFe from 8:00 a `` to *5'00 •£hrough Friday. Tne. Planning. Comsn'�ssnbn will' be reu�lT1g these "dev>pmCnt ' plans -and 11. considering ,them for mp�:osral at its egg rlf seh2"duled me� tt�iI- 4ednesday evening, Febrilar�c. 26, 1586 `(hes� nyetings`° are open to a� pu'61ic' and 11 we ;� welcome. mar tiresence,teettngs� rare hg:TT ai�wLio��ar1�; 46Y Base Line Road, . (oyst week o HelUman7,flnd be�ir} .aro'inptly at ? OQ •i . „ , If,you have any ques'tions' or comments please direct all inquiries 'to myself. I will be happy to .assi:st you. We--look foye,ard to working with` =you as we strive towards •the development' of a City w6 can" 41 l 'he pro ld of. i Sincerely,' 4 COMMUNITY DEVE,:OPMENT DEPARTMENT PLA' ING DIV,IS BrLce Cook - Associate winrtiiar' BCzko G, I(� 9320 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE C • POST OFFICE BOY 30? • RANCHO cL'CA510 .hGA, CALIFORNIA 92 ?3p • �Yl ij i8a1 . `� 7 RUOLUTIORAO. "OF"' A RESOLUTION4, AM- NGA PLANN�14G-i# 14 W. 'C ro E 7 UMS 7HE �.4 EST'� SXOVDF� YE;,%YL � S ggh il', z S 0 LO ay,kof Q.0c',om S, WHEREMS, on-Johe kh' ber,,, 1995.�, it complgft tiort. 8d! ,pot_ ta, '�Irievi.ew '6fo, I Lt file �y th�, abdv 4dei CP k MHEREAS- 2�%I.� d " *�', A", , I an'th' C ga�-An ay Reb,�,,6arYl,� 71119�6111�1 ", o V, - - A thtmov, m m PUnning pb*j, tsfbn, e-des roapci C 1c ambq.g.A - f. as, NOW F t-1 follows: "VI bAt -'t e�followim M SEC11214,,,t T; g cam,bp"Thiet. "d -Osikent 1. That �prqpqe ct 1�§ c6h t yii, the n iaa 01) adtiv#s -,Of "I 01ar i,,and, 2. That the iordp6�s8 �,�t,e 44 ��i t�,obrd w4tft -'th t ,of 'M-,Xq -64 tF iY 4 NO the D e v, 0 6, it,,' e xr _ke pur rives 4� h 1p wh Oted, an iWith �,dtk-'�of the 3� That use it, In --comp,_lalnqg�c app I i ro ions of,the DevAl i�hiCode,' -*Tid, 4. thOj p,r-,o;)ose'&- use tcgether,�,,� wit 6ondj the, fti ns aPpli cabi ez,-.tkereto Will,pot �e deti-imdot4l'�o kh, e,, �� b 10 i C d- f -or matter1ally fhi"rious to health ' ' w0i re, so f, Y."', or � d�. proper es -qr improvements'iij'� the victnity. - SECTION ThA*`heiign RWtw for Tract12830 Appro"ed subject to the conditions and Standard Conditions contaiped, 0thin sdlutlon 8�-,,J40. and the foll owing conditions- 1. All corner dwellings and 2-stlry dwellings shi�,jl have,"the side or rear elevations facin'g":,.the street apgraded 'with adi-'3tlonal wood trim around 'i`Indowss additional wood siding or plant-ons 'Aher appropriate method, subject to review approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance off building permits., 2. Single story flour plans only shaIT- be plotted for Lots 88 through 97. L 11 Resoltit7nn Nti« ' Tract 52830 r 0- Mation"Builders ` Febrrrnry 2Ur, x,1385,: Page 2 ` 3:.' For .all Oe,,ations oft•alI models, `sarchite turai�'detalls on i he :front. elevations shall' be carries; out to some, extent iln ' the =other three elevetjons�. ` Final del ail' ' shall be, ' submitt,4,f6r the revise and approval of the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. On Unit, 1251 -11, cmitinue masonite siding to other side of jarage and wrap around to side a,.ievationC " 5. On Unit 125414, eliminate windwall and -. continua' r4aswilt = siding to other aide of garage and wrap around to: side elevation, ... 5.. All "of ing: material is to be tile. �`. - The wall design for the .aecorati`ve,wal ` on Beryl Street, shall match,' the, w4ll desi4Ih of Tract 1.2414 to the north. The wa11 design should Include a 'minImum 35 foot opening ,., at the,-front V, the- cul -de -sac facing'Beryi. 8. All ratajning walls exnased" to puf is view sfzai'l be provi dud ;,with decorttivji 'treainent. The final design shall be spb3ect rho review and" approval by,, the City Planner prior to ix;taance of boilling permits. 9. A perimeter wail shall be provided along. <i<he southern boundary of the tract. This wall shat -1 be 6 feet high„ with the tower 4 I/2 feet of ma3onry block construction and the top 18 inch °c portion of wrought iron a construction. This wall '�s to be�)cansistant with the approved upon design agreed to .by tM previous.. developer - A -M Con1 an p y= 10. Rear yard fencing shall be installed by the ceveloper 11. The southerly boundary of Lot A., the storm drain easement, is to be walled off to present through 'access to :he south. This storm drain easement its to be walled off on three sides (sci4h, east, and west) with a wall of the same type of construction as the wall provided along the souther',y perimeter of the tract. Along its northern side, a wrought iron gate shall be provided' to 'permit access. The interior of the easement. is to be landscaped. The details of the iandscapi/,ig "sf thM storm 7 drain easement shall be inciuded in the final landscape and irrigation plans submitted for review to the Planning `f Division. The final design and improvement of the storm r drain, easement is subject to the review and approval; of the ;ity Engineers ! (75 Tract taton Su lders _,� February 26, 2986 u Page 3, 12. Sideyard fer�oi.ng for corner lots on the site the street •h4g be <provideccS by the developer R 7rtsure an ,<, adepate se,toack,'of the f�,nce behind the dark 41-ik...`TM, � of y r.' 13. _Side wards 49 .corner lots''between side-yard r "?rxcirR9 and �u back, of walk .sha�lI be landscaped ,anN: irrl"�gat"ed by the -. devet per; .The 1andscap4ng d'eta:� ,sha l be fncluded, on J ' the canal Tand VaPq:`and -trri•gation gala subm tted fb 4the i , Yevie .a d, •approval: to,,the Planning, Ai`Nsioi.. 14. For side on l at ots 1h8'enei` of •cul de -sacs {Lots 3o;-3i,I 73. 74. 63 &4, lfi, a„u u,j the developer shaT1 f,rri, "ate and landscape that portion of the front 'yard6teen, the driuesvay °adjacent y, and the°LL property;' Tide.,,Fiat1 a` landsc4pzrigeiai7ssha3`i e inIUded on ti;e 3addscape` d r �' a T�riga +ion l `for ��ewtew anPlanning a py royal to. the .s�46m�tted 15. The final design for imprOement and mafintelMamce plans or zp the , 26 foot pedestrizn and emergency .easement shall be �, subject to the apisruval of the City Planne rior to.he issuance of boilding �ermi.ts. APPRO�IEO AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF FMRUARYx I985fi PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO'b0CAMOA A s RY:Dennis L.;,Stout, CRh'r �. '. ATTEST, Fad Su I llgr7, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, DWUty Secretary of` the Planning Comrtisslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify -chat the foregoing Rerlolut on was duly and regularly introduced, passed, ar:i adnpted by the Planning Commission of the City of kancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning 'Commission held on the 26th dray of February, 2986, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS:. NOES COM " " +TSSIONEf;: 1 ABSENT: COMM ISSTONER� ' �n fr L AW CITY O0tANGIIt C'QCAAIONGIA j nm ;f O "w L a F't107 7 DATE: February 26, 1986 ry � , Td= cha'�.rmal► 'and Members of the P`Ianning commission FROM: Brad h l "erg, City -Plan er ',. Bl'• Brut;eMirook, Assocl a,P1at SUBJECT: , 3ctl Aid ,LYdi cdib N,Y CbnsidefatuB ' he,rnp?r?etre � l, ,tre tmniiara;recreationl vehic_ 1, st'a "'a�emarareous¢eac;1`titY� aPPEa7..enf the decision of ,tije� pes�ign�lRe view '�omna?�tep' �� V I BACKGIZOUND [ �On January''B,• 1986, the r Ia6Win Commission adopted a ,086''02 a rovaJ CUP g p �, QP X19 + 85Z6 fir a RY storage hat wath na wareh� +lsep located ion the- orth side of B'ase�Line, east of 0 v' Soutfier A 1�i rann E`�di`sod.. +U ilc7 u r Gurridor -within +lie V` curia P11 anned, Gunq,ty,, At the Jblac hearan the ©rtmissi "art 9� gave l'' direction that the applrcant<prov(de, treatment to perimeter Wells to srifte��a their :. visual zmFWO `S` Some suggested'." treatmefsts Tnc7uil2d the use,,' of alter�attiigg,materaals,' o{r settir� . i,ayout to create shado�t l.i�nes = and vIng ' ocket '' P piantings along he walls. 7hee'CO�vnission then directed revdsed plans to 4; sAmitted :�;�.o `the Design ,,Review. Committee. The `Oesign''itlevir g( t or�nittee c$6v' idered' revised plans. on' February 6, 1 986, and ap dyed the prop aced, design, treatment. ' with conditions. Tne pr_o ec applicant,: is not in agreement with the proposed conditions aand has submitted a, letter requestinq hai'• the decision of the Des;gn Review Ca.� ai {tae be r6viewed. by Via; full Commission. ANALYSIS; The William Lyon Company h,is proposed a' perimeter wail Treatment combining split -face tr,._ck` with a -fluted split face cad and pilasters. The wa.,,1 is proposed as lineal, aith PC, offsets. Wall height is to be 8 -feet high. The-Design Review Committee., in their review of the project„ agrwod with the - basic, design concept, but felt 'greater visual interest was needed,, to added a:he . conditions to stagger wall sections and to provide tree pockets to he spaced every 100 feet, ITEM H w° ,, a .:. -1 .�; ...q. si' ✓' ','� !. ''�,K'�� '���1i`�f ?CAN J PtI'NG CO M{!iIS�I4N T i ;,TAF�REP�ti CLIP 85 -26 7tle Wa l l l=drtt Lyon Company ; February 86;.1986, Page #2 �« i 9 Thee Design kevieW` Committes's concern was -'-ghat the •proposed a perimeter'`treatrpent in combination with its tremendous langth (about 1,Ofln, feet }, world resul� in a repeat "hive; and monotonous , design. Tfiis - -concern was for both„ exterior, .public yie'Ws and internal views,, from adjacent private pi`ooerty. , "While perimeter f yin public v ,ew is certainly an impoi^tant element., how , this perimeters Would be Viewed ft-am--adjacent private propewty-,was an equally held consideration. Especially impottant wash the view orientation dir- ..ected° outward towards the abutting property to the east which is °w, liarge, ,vacant parcel slated for multi-family residential development. *._ In an effort to, promote design variety to reduce .the repeti'tjVeress= of, the wall length and to increase its visual interest, "the Comnmifttee_ recommended offsetting wall- sections, to provide horizontal offset and 'scai`e, and, to incorporate tree pa l;Fts tq be spaced 'at 100 foot iMervals.. The planting` of these 'trees would provide a vertical dirensibn to the perimeter to help balance the large horizontal mass+ issoclated wittti the tremenda� " f, wall length. Tha William Lyon Company objects to the Design Review Committee's:t 7 requirements for.wall offsets arl tree pockets and has submittedO • a lettrr requesting reconsidera. i by, the ful= l commissioii. The basis of the objections are that wall offsets' "and tree pockets` \, would reduce useable storage and;, parking area and,, would present securt:y and aintendnce difficulties.' u III. RECOMMENDATION- Staff rec!Anends that the Planning .Commission consider all iiateriai input regarding' this project; If ttie Commission agrees with the Findings of the Ues�,gn Review Canymittea, then concurrence with the Design Review Committee decision should be documented through minute action. llespectfully submitted, Brad Fluller City Planner B6:6C:cv Ati.achments: Exhibit "A" - [and Use Map r Exhibit "B" - Location Man Exhibit "C" - Detld led" Site Plan I' Exhibit., "D" - Pre7lminary`Landscape Plan Exhibit "Ell - Building Elevations /Well Treatment < E Resolution No. 86 -02 URC Action - februYry 6, 1986 i Letter of Appeal from William Lyon - February 11,.1986 E i Ts' � '�, - ^.vs�•n. -„- . � t ?�T '^+!FF•9�. ^�x5'"z F"f7r , "A `7 �'.w.•...L.+rc'iu.�w�...+.. ��� y ms's �. ti ,.,,,: -t ,e•. w°v.�ep ttY'IM �. 3. L Rio EL►y1F„�ROADx ts. }.„ S .. y F r { �yy,.z• -�.v �!'.. "a'_,�'_"'» •'•+.asa the 4 � 3f: 'rd r..w:cr� f ' t::- (:' .�..' ° �:, . -• � •q�.� ^� _.,.ar�war�.+...�.vw'�.s �s ..... 1 RR OLD RR •xl. �� H 'f fl ea ''h�.��. M.'.i•;.._,,,, *- .. `..# t`n.` \jR71. ��.. �t ,i[��a^'�zlm� �� �w+�tF� ��'�V^•`_"�j y +"°""^"""'� � .E i,, f:. S'.�t L`e»c4tii•c.�.s.«- f.°o`a�i`„oai"i[' 4 RR r, RR + s��'` RFi. t �."arroireaa' _ {/i�. _ t wuEa arFtruE c � ,^ b .rr {�� fy% .�� � ,�• �'�•+±�± -'1 �,.�..a,[ z. �—�" .�...rrks $�'4 � 1 ] '�a', ~� tRR 1 RR'�� L R�'•' Ni ALCE� t ' EA oil ES; CO ,M —J ��• y• .F= —y " e� !VICTORIA LAKES a s F i � a; RR. W -s ? ter `'f • _ LdND USE LEGEN, �„y rr F ! :'•. u _ a l - �" z' .rte l• AESICENTM w{'ta. •f �'•�r.:jj lr.�a. Q tow 3•a owa 2 E k E ' RR 3 RR ,m...amur e-e pw. L] re0nw ..w ara EF CommeAVAL F,jlOT� flCtt({= Y:.RG_. - ,�� ��+� x•aaaua t1Y r �±q - t L:; •i aECro•.a{. CR +fta t � - i "[• atciwu .uu�e- orncaeeo-r[icw � ' p i Q r4itG[ AartaGq FMiC► i k'04ER USES 't la tnima:•.a.ai+ae +wee , RR 124Fa;p �' arK eta...rotawsrtaiawt t L_ p a:.t. f>n.n uscc COMMUNITY PLAN ell Wetoria A Planned, Commun`t in Rancho Cucamonga Awl �Rda, w _ ` '� ra�crnwr »,_ ...�., •.�,•; ,„ � _ llYSwaSifOUP�, e,, land pFsnnet5 '�' shwa�lua ski 't --I-3 ^s3�r 3Nt j s r rg IF CL cl iL ' 9 i2 O [ •3 W L 0 c i W �� W U 4_ r _ a CL CL z h,l :s 6 _Z Z O J i� CL g LU IL cu z W ¢- p' Cf) co C/) < I r I_ dyl i P N kih 1 ; 9r t ki, V11 s s bc� f So i i ' 1 f Et 4` i FT. _ � sly. .. � F • a '. 1 �. __.� SONSEHT 4A'.ENDAR ITEMS--AGENDA E� 5ruary — 6., 1986 .� ,r 4 b I. K. 7T lO$ ?7 - REt;CO / ^1 +TBruce ( Review of rear building elevations ;; v Committee Action. ,. Rear building, elevations-are acceptaole. r Sidi, ng material needs to be identified. Chimneys to� be a brick, block, material, not siding. 2. _ TTs 12642 • 12643 - GAR'YN DEY. Bruce , ;Review of revised Tract Maps for Phases I &� II of the Caryn Planned,Coarrunity iA Committee "a Action_ Revised design -is acceptable. ,Lot "F" may be necessary to be realigned to a more linear configuration per the direction of the City Planner. ' 3. TT 12642 - KAUFMAN &D Review of revised house plans i' Bruce Committee Action: „ Action it to be deferred until more detailed house plans are submitted. 4. GUP $5 -26 WILLIAM LYON Review of perimeter wall treatment for RV� Bruce facility Committee Action: The basic design of split face with a fluted split face cap and pilasters is r acceptable. The wall is to offset in and ou t with a tree well to be spaced every ry TQD feet. The internal circulation - system _ proposed is satisfactory. 3_ �c. RESOWTU 10td NO. 86 -02 A .RESOLUTI OF THE" RANCHO° CUCAMONCA PLANh�tJ COMMIS�ruN � APP RO> �N6 , CB OnTIONAt USE Pi =RtiTT N0+ $5�^? f"OR STLO T'AITH t14I WAREHOUSE' ! �L�A�T D� >ON T )w faiORaTH StID� OF B{ISKINE, E "A�S� OFD Thy `SOUi1NER t CAL' F RNS D�ISON��._ �1, ,�I�. t!TILI I CORR�I OR`IN THE' MEOIUM: }!an ?FC�IDEdfI�AL OT,STRI T t cI4-24 d)U AG, ,WITHIt+xT,1 E V29Tdt #TA �.`T 13 COhiMUN3TY: WHt fiE /iS on ,the 28th; day of August, 1485, a ,comp+et: pp�lAation was filed by,Wilit*q.LyoCq ,for reviadi� of�the� above d�cx•lbed project�_,and s a ; WHEREAS,. Qn `he 8th day,, of January, 198`6, the Ranch® Cucamonga` Planninrg co" tissio heFd' a publ;�c faearing to cons�i,d'e`r the above sar lied project. �{ NOW, TREK FORE,,,Oe- RanchosCucamon §a Planning Commission resol ,v? ae follows: SEar20N 1: That the fgllowing findings can be meat: g. 1. That the proposed u4,e is in- _accord with the General 4', Plan, the objectiVes of the V+6toria,' Planned , k Community ; andthe,purposes of the district ih which the site 1s located, 2.. °rhat'thr propose use, Together with the conditions ' applicable, thereto, will not be detrimental "to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially' injurious to properties or improvements in the t vicinity. 3. Th,,t the 'proposed use complies with each of the,, applicable- provisionE of the Victoria Placned Community. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment an tat a Negative Declaration is issued on January 8, 1986. SECTION 3': That Conditional Use Permit No. 85 -26 is approved subject t0—t-Fe-70-170wing , conditions: l _ w . °, tit a� ���, c_•- -` .'k Planning f l� 1. The approval of 'this permit is granted sut,�jg;f,to.:the apnro and adapt op of yacta�riafaPlanned Commune � A'mendment (VP(') 85 , Cro by Jtfie` City t Wi o ' r . uncl h ado,�pti ,�o'1tpC `85 p Ject s`haii, .conform ao all', of, ills regthreaints a+ �; )� 6. The final design of-ihe lgasa LiplL ,parkway shall be consistent storage 7.o ,•for - ��- .,z ': 2. The mini warehouse portdon of this facti�ty�shai'1 operate 'only Nor the pa of ry ameters the- defyn�ti0n a' m�of ;wareh use as,. specifie *o. in , qej tictoria< �nity Plan. ;Aj {; . for the review and approval of t(te Planning Division r 3. The park,i4n1g` pads wfthiing`the storage lot s'hal`l only, be;,. uszd for the ,< storage on,tl prior to the issuance of permits. of .recreati venri cl es a'nd for no other 7. purposes. 4, Covered enclosdd=- iarkf:n sh.il bi? provided r`o,�:.'ehe- cdAetakp }."'s use of pull-through spaces where a vehicle can access a space ,A, unit. without having to back up. 5. A master plan of trees shall be, provided <a nSl a Tree Removal Permit 'granted for., any trees fo be : re'moveil -the prior td is of permits. The exi.s#ng° Blue Gum, Eudal:yptus snal 1 be removed along the project st northern perimetEr acid shah be re ? d b Potable water shall be provided, F ace y the F'+rdlyptus Maculate; 'minimum 15 ga ? ?on size,. punted at 8 feet qr = enter. ' , . s 6. The final design of-ihe lgasa LiplL ,parkway shall be consistent with the approved standard for Ba a Line Road, This d4MCM shall be included I in Wd lands: ape and irrigation plait submitted r . for the review and approval of t(te Planning Division prior to the issuance of permits. 7. The circulation system shall be modified to� al j' err functional use of pull-through spaces where a vehicle can access a space ,A, without having to back up. 8. Potable water shall be provided, i 9. All roofing material on the caretaker's quarters Is to be tile to the satisfaction of the City Planner. i 10. The on -site landscaping should be designed with,, emphasis" to screen and soften visual impacts from off -site views. 11. Treatments shall be provided to perimeter walls to ;;often their visual impacts by such means as using alternating, materials, creating shadow lines, vine plantings on wall,- etc. to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 1 + s,', y " l'r.. s � �� � �a`ge•S '�� .`_' - 12.lasanry X11 s n are to be , prods ded a1 oAg alt 'd_ pgrty per,imetersn, bile e�gi�ts�r�sbpi be ;l:ncreased from ".F th 8''TO iile?is&Q�� d1��r��Ona� Soreening aY1dr5eCttrl'y. �i72 W� Bher bP stagger >,ed: tc i n6te,pe 'v�rt ety, anC a rsuai . a . f, 13. Fina! ,plans sha be submitted for the rev5ew art�d,,�approva� of the Oesigh Reui "e Comm tee prior to thesrnce of 6i 'ding., LngiRr e� erIng " 1 The di-yetoper's'' enneer4 sha11p�ro�de a ,dr}tical ai`gnment oc deslg� for• �Bse""Ltne�Rp "d"�fro�: Dayk,Grebk 6ou7evai^d to,��°V�e�r2a , PaF,k Range° to be a�pro. byihe4 �1tY'ngi(teerprior��o'ther issuance af��a gradnga�buaidi'ng pe�?m�t `The ca'ns*rttt��ai?nz. portions, `of �t,Vhe s.tree iraprpve�net�t0im ay • have to be _) urrt I i a long rear ofrdadiay cat,€e ronstrucCed therefiare, and ti i i e , sashes Payment to, tie tatty wt`t ! ie requi red r ', deferred impement °s, "j• °a.. 2,1' "The method of Arainning*'the site shall be ,cojtspatible with the " design _of° Base E.ige Roadas approved• by th' ^C1ty Englr�eer* If' , drai>lsyeis Ito ' °tie ditrected �to to saecri a's phoposed' . an { J'• i asement .from• fi se Litre "�Raa o tt retcgtion Basin to �thQ� so ",h wil•1 be r .quired prior) t0 the issuance of a grad!ttg or, building permit. 3. J A detailed flood. r,znort,Ilfor t he project shalt be- prepared by the devul op #rs Sc[igi rcax. and ,approved' by ,the City En` i neer . ri or to the -issuance of a 9rading..or bulldthg permit, the report j shall contain deta0ed infoamaf, kn such as calculatiions, w sections, etc„ to justify' the proposed designs. In partic:tlar an indepth analysis of the method -of Protecting the site from flows through the railroad culvert directly to tie north of the E project (24© .fs shown on the preliminary ,,re rt) shall b provided, t e 4. erior to the issuance of a building permit, thQ developer shall j pay an in -lieu i._ for one half the cost of undergrounding the .existing overhead utilities fronting the site on Base Line Roar. The fee shall he held for contribution to the future undergrounding of the utilities within the }project area. -' Am I I & lit v } S Pagea��f x APPR011fiD`�ItJD 1 D T +t I►S�8TH` DKY OF -,,JAN 1986. b PLAt�,N„ COMMI TiOy (�� �IYY DF §�ilAtiCFld fCUqAKPN G BY: en,�tis� out la►ztt w^ ATTEST:. f ra ur' erg rou ecret�� . I. Brad Bud °let��t,0�eputy "�Secpe�ar�y o ttiep P annyng Go �asszon o`i nth Cit af= Rancho Cucamonga do here certif t7 the f6Pgoigg�psgitian w sdul ynd' regtti arly `i nt od�ided F pas ed � d f a � g Co im s o�of the �t r . ed nby he PT dO,n��� - = City of Rancho Gt%among�, r..6 ��,mPet4ng'`,o�t tiie� Pl�a�n"�rng�CotnrisCsi:on held ". on the 8th day o l nt r 086 :by t�,e fol7 aw hg, vote, to rn ,` „ r ' j Jk a4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMP'EL, BARKERj- CHITIEA, MGNIEL, STOUT NOES: CO�ISSx�O�R S, • _ "kOf�E � ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:- NOta� u a f '# w�. A jA��, 7y'+�YY_ ter' ry � r s 11540 ARCHIBIID,�UIT B, RANCHO CUCANfONGA, CA 91730 #14j 9 ©0-244 .,a . , Mr. Bruce Cook February 31, l'986 City of Rancho- Guemong,a g _ Subject: Victoria,- R.�iwJ55torage F'aci`lity " Dear Bruce, ` s' Pursuant to our telgpbone conversation 21 'O.A6 `* of we hereby request the ogp6rtun3ty +to review ",the •llesign F,eW°fes�'Committrpe's €° recommendation for wall treratments, for; subject 'praj,ect with the r full Planning Commission at.,its`2 /26YA6 meeting. ' At the 2 /6 1B�j6esIgn.Review Committee meeting you told us ¢ that the Commies ee wante.d "tree pockeis" spaced at 100 foot in— r, tervals as wellt�as off sets in the east and west boundary wal1�. t .# We do not fee'.that,Fither ` of.fhese requests are appropriate design elements for this project for,the folioI;Ing reasons: r 1. Offsets in these walls would `decrease useable storage and parking space while creating security hazards and maintenance difficulties. Additionally, the visual impact would in our opinion, be insignificant based on the length and scale of the +ails, the fact that C both sides will ultimately be obscured by development and the distance of the walls from high -speed vehicular i traffic on Baseline. 4 rf Z� REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT h xr t r, r " t 2. "Tree ,pOe eit •: proV 3"e a significant ..seaur .ry liability U : Y Rxnva direg'arces4 tq an otherwise., controlled fscilLty' " And further sia to 'a`�XlWlsance for,cleariup' and a.potential�t, liabdliSy Far falling debris dpringrhigh kinds.. "Tree poc%ess'x would also,, infringe on useable Jaikng � ' and stortagg area , and ,require further oomptomis in :r r "'3 t the VrPjaots' °�sOdur-itt ..• integrity for tree maintenance from with,£ii the ,.project. . This project has been catphut..iy and thoughtfully designed to respond T , " to the needs of Ehe eomminity and ,the desiras of the City- ^ We res- submit thati G pectfully ere are sighificant�_°p rob lems'' pre say, Cad bX. wall offsets and treO pockets and we request they be omitted as re- quirements of this prdj.e:ct.F S Please notify us. of confirmation of the hearing date for this matter. i Respectfully, V� Steven Ford Project Manager The William Lyon Company` SF:pm r P ;.. J � �jF�'[ �S' rp°v"frcq'°`'�Y' .ta ^• s7A ,F ^'e qr q fi;�% ..- � "4 �, x CITY OF F,lNCHO OUCAMO,i+TGA STA F P-0 RT 7 9. M 1977 i DATE: February 26, 1981 j TO: Chairman and= Mdinhers of the Pla,;n•ing Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Curt Jotsnstgn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HUNTERS RIDGES... SPECIFIC' PLAN -- CITY OF FONtANA — Planning CQmmi ss°i an l.qu �uaw q , of land use'altei^n i res for the Kuhters Ridge Spectt-1c-Pfian on :567.6 acres of -land wAthin the City of Fontana, lbcted on the north side of SummT. - Avenue � A east of San Sevaine Creek, west of the Devore Freeway.' ; h.. 1. BACKGROUND; This item 'was referred to the P the Cit Council in October, 1985. Three fanning Commission on use ' y , ` preliminary land use alternatives were revieWed by the Commission; however, at that time the City of Fontana .stated that the alternatives would be completely revised after further research and analysis. Please refer to the October 9, 1985, staff report and minutes for u background information and discussion of major issues. ,. The following sections of this report p provide an overview of the �1 previous Planning Commission comments, a description of the three new land use alternatives and analysis. Review of the alternatives focuses on impacts v the project as they relate to Rancho Cucamonga. II. PREVIOUS COMMENTS: At the October 9, 1985, meeting, the CGmmisslon stated that all three alternatives presented were unacceptable. However, the alternative shown on page 3 of this report was least objectionable, since it incorporated several char_s,c-�ristics important to this City as follows: ,t � y ITEM I i k } i •� .Sa.''�; 'k 4 .: �; iii y� 'vyy� _�..��•....,� PlA`N, GP'GOM �� FF{3pORT� P!" Hun e�ys� R�"d9 Sp a � eh CAty of Fontana °� Februrt�y -`' Page: .2 ; ° Na 1, The total un rt count of , 705 dwe,,'h Iec ngs - ref�ted IMJi sens;it'lidy to surrounding land u'se and sate, constrains such as gradA. g an4flood controlk; ° s 2. pEstate;' tats adjacent. t "Summit,AVenue and Slan`SQVaI e Creek rovile a t%aanstion to the half acre lots south �+of the pra3ect site; an .Rancho Cucamonga and` the potentirale�al Park- •alnEZgF SankSev'a-ine wash. � r� 3_ The' circulation system provides for access to' Duncan aCanyon rathetr than um�lhsiiing Summit and Cherry RvenGes;,t _ 4. No commercial zoning is provided; .and „ 5. The mix of dwelling unit, types (single =family -versus, multi- family), is more in tune with fsfture development in the area. In to addition commenting on the alternatives, the Planninig Commission provided the foilowiK� gener-a� cgneerns: ryP - 1. Preservation and sensitivity to existing ., +natural features, land forms, and .historic features on the site, should be considered, particularly in regard to mature vegetation such as Eucalyptus trees and grading; 2. The project design should consider site constraints and limitations presented by natural hazards such' as slope " stability,-flooding, seismic conditions, wind turbulence, and wild land fire; 3. East /West access north of 24th Street, connecting the site to the west as established in the West Valley Foothills Plan, should be reviewed; 4. The project design. should integrate the future San Sevaine' Creek Regional nark through appropriate orientatiion and land use t ~ansition; and 5. Regional trail connections as outlined on the City's General Plan and West Valley Foothills Plan should be provided. ' tea. PLANII4 G..aC�Ofi �S�Q REPORT ' tiuruters d ofontarta �. Fed =uarY Page to ,71tRA1f�AJ y?,a`HS� f X151 j i two ti Y � t tKW t51 . Kr w 7t N' al i Hunters Ridge Sper;�i an City of Fontan< )) Februar�r 26, T9B6 Page #4c° T I III. LAND I1SE ALTERNATM ES: The - alternatives reviewed last- Octotier represented "rang of design concepts with t'ie number ofr u4itrs varying rom'>;;7,05 to 2; 41 dWelliti�s` In .6ntrasty fire µ ' props a*1 now presented are: fill very s3miltr, 'part Vcul,arly in regard to unlit count, product - mi:I and primary circu`latinn�„� APParentTy, tease alternatives are more raflectiwe ,of' the developer intent. Without ,gqung ,into the'�speci°fics of each ahte at1ve, fhe unit ceunts range` from 1„930 (5-5 du /ac average density), up to 2076 (6.0 du /ad aver dehs,ftyii typical. ,the u is rbughl ^y % multi fami'1� and'65� single- fimil/. � Of tshe "single -farm y� units, y g ,k 44 to 50i have a ii;nimum lit si'zetof 5,609 square feat, while only 3% range, rcm IQ,,:060 to 15,,'000 square fee }. ` The three land use al:ternaiives are shown. at the end of this report. Alternatives One and Two are, very similar -its concept with a central c�re�af multifamily units and single - family lots around' the perime er of the project. By contrast, Alterstative Two Proposes V',ulti -family units at the southeast• corner o' the'' oject along Suriffit Avenue and the Devore° Freeway. A 5 acre commercial si' a is provided- along the extension of Cherry Avenue, north of s° Summit. A feature similar iA all three alternatives is the realignment of the Hawker Crawford Channel to the south perimeter of the:_project (on the north side of Summit Avenue).; a regional trail adjace:st to San Sevaine waste and along the northerly utility corridor; a 13 acre equestrian center; primary access to Duncan Canyon to the east, and, single- family lots ranging in size from 10,000 cquare f66t to 15,000 feet square at the north en> of the site in San Sevaine Canyon. 6 IV. ANALYSIS: The majority of comments presented in October still apply, with the exception that primary circulation to the east will be provided, and the design does consider the future San Sevaine Regional Park (pedestrian trail, landrr.,aping, and side -on " 3 cul -de -sacs open to the wash) Equestrian trails should also be provided along the west boundary of the project and within the utility corridor connecting to the equestrian center. Regarding Alternative Two, the multi - family units along Summit Avenue and the. freeway may establish a undesirabl,tz; precedent ' for development along I -15, as well as impact the rur'l character of the area. x ^! wrl PLANT > p� CJM }ISSN f1ON` STAFF EPO T Hunters Rac±,ge Spec, :fic ¢tan - City of Fontana February6,1986 r Pages , Few design details of the plan were provided with the alternatives and are attachgd to this report. The Community Structure Plan "- (Exhibit "0 ") provides further detailing of Alternative Two, which clay mean that it is the preferred a'lternative�.. Notes on Exhibit state that lots will be terraced to provide views and 'J windrows will be reintroduced. Basically, this is ndicat -J- that the natural - )features of the site will be substantialiy'alte;- W,46_4 existing mature vegetation removed. ., Given the intensity of the development, Cherry Avenue south of the site will 'require improvement beyond the 44 foot curb -to -curb width specified, in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Added runoff from the site and t tb realignment of the F3wker- Crawford Channel ,will also require major improvements of Summit Avenue where it crosses. San Sevaine wash. Both of :these items must be provided for with °I development of the site. In addition, maintenance provi!,_ons are necessary for landscaping and trails along the perimeter of the-:. project,_ particularly on Summit Avenue. r; In summary, the major concerns regarding the alternatives\ appear to be as follows 1. The overall density is high given site constraints and the rural character of the area. J 2. The intensity of multi- family units along I -15 and commercial u_yelopment will establish an undesirable image or precedent fqr- '7uture development an surrounding property. 3. latural features of the site will be significantly altered b_v the plan. 4. Equestrian trails should be located ;4djacent to San'Sevaine wash. I I S. Improvement costs directly related to the project, but within Rancho Cucamonga, must be provided by the developer and /or the City of Fontana. 6. Alternatives One or Three„ with larger lots along the: southern boundary of the project and no commerica;i;-> facilities, are least objectionable. ?i V. RECOMMENDATION: The .Planning Commission should review the proposed alternatives as they relate to the City of Rancho. 1 C Cucamonga. Comments shawl -.s- ba referred to the City Council by minute action for their ravierr 6n eiarch 19, 1986- i h � � �m k dn�ers��i e ic�a g� y,,o Pon Y' nq Fe 6 1 s ,v page f p h ( S f 31 e , Respectt U,l lyj,submi tteA,r_ ., Brad Buller rA. City Planner,` gB: CJ: cv Attachments: Exhibtt-A klteraatilre 1 ray`. Exh�b•it ,O Aglternatxive 2 .'= ;'�..' Exhibit A�terna�tiYe'3 Exinb t O �De sjgn 5keLch 1,f or. 'Hunter's f . Ridge` October 19; X985`, Re port Planning. Commission Ml,nUtas October 9, 1985 4 C x ^F v 'III T SUMMARY P,� �t • ` l)�~{ . 7 t d +x of .,A:.h Prod'JCt DUTAC AC Ouls a r Jt �° er�raan 2.O 3F,5 63 :r r++. 7200 0.5 $S•0 122 6000 4.5 99.0 445 pi ..) t s s i "'., : r• •, ,�- i :yr ,, fi ;,3r. 5000 SA 1:30.5 659 j �" Y .l4 ° ` 4 8»WU R'tC Nii170NA1 P0 f+4 i7+ a •t l0tT M3 12.0 21.0 252 27.0 560 to SUBTOTAL ;344.0 2,Q76 qu"tvsartce+) r2.t)a OKS) .I t�>ttgTN. EqueOtrian Games 19.0 AC , SthooUPath =A0 t 't t s ^• ay J :., T f ,.. t'si" ►'�'�' ` Open Sogsv 173.6 AC. fi t . t. q `r S', 'it• `" '``' `"N± r4;atJ 2w Major Road 23.5 AC It { �4 ESTATE ,^ ' � i a J)♦ �1 ^�''1 �fti s 71TA4 362.5 Al Project TrAl t � ` , f.. � 1 U..OA1 , \ '• "' t � r• MNl f 1 �. � � • : t s -1� lt.. t ` � .. .a?4. �', ,1�:1 Reg(a+al Yrsi t)pEK3rACE S i .« .,.. i! rK� a J' Y ti •.. �E Cr J'l ter, ~ • `' • t' 7 ja •ne.«.rww...w�...s.rJ.... T.• L EC4ESMAN a as rw.•a.urwaJnwww '� r ' n : C• ( ti`, 7'00 r �CNNTt7r rr �lAApj • 120 AC f ^'J jj1y hMYwan) (Ra ),' (A—") 42 iw :.. b.,., y„ �, tMT Dad S+ta 6000 tet 3lr. 41 l0l Srr. air t 13 AC �- �,• i/,, 4 C171iJ. o r • ! / j �—� a4ea�y •. �5r-.+ ;t �} . moo ismo 12=0 T200 920Am 070 i 0000 2200.0400 2000 „ SAPI SEVAM)E WASH.'* a7�! 4.4"AC/IJ�(:. • ; i )' SOOO f000.2ppp: 530, 2JS IX1 St ArAt12YENi3� 2TA AC I • T 1, 23200 soon py r �(7/ t TOWYMOAIEZ r� �... 352 Lq I ` ) ♦` S K. �� l ar± r)eS A'tA'd . IOOtl � q. � .. � 3 4 i L ♦. -�' 000 `�" 2a 0(i LL " " I 36oAC 270 DV tasouq fi�rr d T w �' r KS y a •'� ,y ..�wf .Ara«uc. y '�""'2'.. ,•)» ETEHTIUK�BASiH' HUN 1 ERS j A SPECIFIC ELAN li %"'FREFARED BY THE- �_ G ,CITY aF FONTANA »Q , At-llgir II j� .FjETENTION cr OVE 2 A SPECIFIC PLAN r HUNTE R S' W �'PREPARED BY THE "T �CITY OF [RIDGE "ONTANAJ 115 SUMMARY P roduct Type DU /AC AG estate —1-1ZO 31-5 Zs 7200 3-5 45.5 P 0000 4.5 coca 6.0 1064 460 • L _••••..i Project T,:.',,,, 573 SweERNARomawknoNA FOR9.1 Towrthomes IZO 31;6 372 Apartments 2q.0 20.0 400 SUOTOTAL 349.0 2,047 't- Q. tan mrs) Open Space 167.8 •SAN 12.5 At: SEVA-WE WASH.:?-, t; Equestrian Center Major Road 13.0 AC 20.5 y- Famlt:ltaaoa 1) 000-moon Coirritemm 50 AC aaso Coco !=M-400 7400 z , At-llgir II j� .FjETENTION cr OVE 2 A SPECIFIC PLAN r HUNTE R S' W �'PREPARED BY THE "T �CITY OF [RIDGE "ONTANAJ 115 SUMMARY P roduct Type DU /AC AG estate —1-1ZO 31-5 Zs 7200 3-5 45.5 P 0000 4.5 coca 6.0 1064 460 • L _••••..i Project T,:.',,,, 573 SweERNARomawknoNA FOR9.1 Towrthomes IZO 31;6 372 Apartments 2q.0 20.0 400 SUOTOTAL 349.0 2,047 't- Q. tan mrs) Open Space 167.8 SchooUparl, 12.5 At: uuft.1 Equestrian Center Major Road 13.0 AC 20.5 y- Famlt:ltaaoa 1) 000-moon Coirritemm 50 AC , At-llgir II j� .FjETENTION cr OVE 2 A SPECIFIC PLAN r HUNTE R S' W �'PREPARED BY THE "T �CITY OF [RIDGE "ONTANAJ 115 TOTAL 567.6 AC Regional Trail • t w x µ { +...> - • L _••••..i Project T,:.',,,, uuft.1 4 y- Famlt:ltaaoa 1) 000-moon 13.000 aaso Coco !=M-400 7400 , At-llgir II j� .FjETENTION cr OVE 2 A SPECIFIC PLAN r HUNTE R S' W �'PREPARED BY THE "T �CITY OF [RIDGE "ONTANAJ 115 SUMMARY Product f:= t l j . v u� 1 l YP8 �lOu1AC AC 0U,6 1 a� Esfater— 2,0 3.15 7200 3.5 'S40 164 N,} ti ti _ .t L ,•'. u`000 4.5 129S 564 ,! .) c ,. •' N SC-00 5,0 99.5 499 �. i 1 l .:t • � _. � ` •SAM BERNAR03NU NAilUNk FCRE$r 'a' �., Townhomes 12.0 16.0 216. j Apartments _ 20.0 194 38c -, _ •r'.. •!, 11 '�• _+` f +. ^rl "lltrti�SUBTOTA4. 351.STS.930 r, j i r • 1' 1 1 :r :, tMali TWaAnpwa O 12.188 -op'3) 4 n 1 " .�.•` +IM •• {� ; i J «. ,~ t 1 Y School/Park ;13.0 AC Cpen.Spaeo 169.4 ACS` MaloT Road 20.7 AC s �.•• .' e ) 7 a, is r S �EDuaatrian _X Cent,, 3.O AC ,j ESTATE 31:.A C l ,, t TOTAL 56716 AC e }., , z,. j,``- ✓� L 4 Regional Trait �Y t 'x � � r � • - jti t'•.. � Project 7184 v f r OPEN SPACFyf �• _.. � i!.._ SCW 4 { I GUESTRIAh 2r0ACA [` n CENfR 103 . •, t -_ f1.0 A k { L f _ „ `� N t!•�d Slxe G,... wt S- 01.1. lal Sxa kI30 C1r: �� ' � � � 31P E Ia1st.0.a0o1. 11,000•)3,000 iJ,000 7206 a200-9500 $ago APiWTMr '1 } 80011 7200.4400 SAN 8'VAINE WASH Isla Ae NT3 y!' ` , �j 1 i w00 anoo -TaoO ae>o0 ago If 9. 3906 I t y 1fv J - •1 `. ` TOWNHDMES `t4-o he E r {eo otP r0 H BA„IM ztaliu E ` '.zl! 1E• Il lllJ 2410U r OPEN SPACE t OPENEN SPACE 1 rt 1 • �. �- ___ -- _= �— % %•' GOB.. { {{ •j - �! 11.0 AC 5000.. F 84.0 AC 424 A 111 lX/ C l 9 pU 1 1 s I• I �` � N ,f 4 1 X. 490 AC Y f j721 W `. �. 2999 27:0 122 OU •:a>: � urd ensw '� vi? ta�rr•�' i VLG r'-- t _ HUNT jA SPECIFIC PLAN f�'°" !6'�U V � �r. �� N ! � PL dam: cz���T,r RJ tr y� }' PREPARED BY THE � 1, »1 �,� CITY OF FONTANAJ' �j �� E' mu,erur�.r.wsa. i (.wovns..i.n.ccna. HUNTERS RIDGE cmroFFOrnaN�caustxwu .1�' as" _ �r NO,RFH �� ITF�` �, vt RANa7lO rir"(Y,\ i'fTLis: PLANNM TAVEM EXHur. !-, scA i E. --- 'f o =0-O �-q a f I _ -'/ + fi��' ° %,,rZli'YG.! 47,.V r E' mu,erur�.r.wsa. i (.wovns..i.n.ccna. HUNTERS RIDGE cmroFFOrnaN�caustxwu .1�' as" _ �r NO,RFH �� ITF�` �, vt RANa7lO rir"(Y,\ i'fTLis: PLANNM TAVEM EXHur. !-, scA i E. --- 'f o i �F Sm •' i � I `�• SnlFW +iOxO.Ltw41OF5T PEDESTRIAL TRAIL- STREETS OPEN TO TRAIL " �'•__z� xya a REGIONAL EOUESTRiAN CENTER r SECONDARY PROJECT ENTL, ;' y SPECIAL THEME INTERSECTIONS palm special lighting .trees, .J J G�J REINTRODUCTION OF WINDROWS r J • N LOTS TERRACED WITH 1 t ,q �-+ .7•�l Z• ,� bnaJ•I { J CONTOURS TO PROVIDE VIEWS EASEMENTS IMPROVED --• -w WITH LANDSCAPE" r���yy r• amo V� � �3 3 -t� � LZ '4 4� PALM TREE ENTRY ;ROADS triangularly space palm trees } 3 ts0»' ~�"" *• pedestrian trait expand-,d a.o.w. to create grand scale Place Ll;, tights an trees at intersections }; �i�^I� l . ' gip• flELOCATt, HAWKER CRAWFORD CHANNEL. off- street pike trail a ` expanded greenbelt, trees: and turf adjacent to s:.rest rip -rap edge planted base of channel internal 3 pedestrian trail to connect front door image With landscaping, P 9, PRI;AARY PROJECT ENTRY areas and turf simulated gatehouse walls, night lighting crossover bridge to protect entry FOREGROUND LANDSCAPING TO HELP river rock pilasters SCREEN HOMES IN BACKGROUND palm trees up- lights HUNTERS RIDGE CITY OF FONTANA, CA CI i Y OF RA-NU-10 CJC"ONG.A. TITLE= KAMM DIvIS N E`CHIBIT, -= SCALE., 71i, YL K� 1 ` STONE P11 ASTER IN MEDIAN f� CREi)T,E ` SENSE OF ENCLOSURE M�G` _;I } t s: 1 LARGE ENTRY PILASTER WALL W /WALL OF ACCENC PAVING, .;M COMPLIMENTARY COLOR PALM TREES—TALL VERTICAL I JELEMENT TO CREATE PEDESTRIAN TRAIL ` F a gt FURTHER SEtvwE OF ENTRV' H�SWKER CRAWFORD -- ��^ CHANNEL WOOD RAILS W /STONE- -< RIP -RAP EDGE & CHANNEL PILASTERS ON BRIDGE S U M M I T A V E Primary Project Entry a PEDESTRIAN TRAIL TO CONNECT EXPANDED RIGHT-OF -WAY WITH COMMUNITY TRAIL SYSTEM TO INCLUDE HIKE TRAIL, l TF.EME LOW RAIL FENCE All, RIP RAP CHANNEL EDGE g SUMMIT AVE A WALL & BUFFEP PLANTING RANDOM TREE PLANTING TO TO SCREEN CREATE TURF .B TURN -OUT \ RE,qIDENTIAL UNITS AREAS ALONG TRAIL TURF OR GROUNDCOVE3 ON BASE OF CHANNEL Section of Hawker Crawford Channel CIT T Rumq CLTT PLANNING DRgSTON EXHIND SCALE- r , ' RESIDENTIAL CL-DE-SAC. \ BACKS TO EX?ANDEDPARKWAY SHRUB & VINE PLANTING ii TO SOFTENNVALL r �r PARKWAY OPENS TO CREATE AN EXPANDED SENSE OF SPACE - t ' - - CHERRY AVE BROAD 'VISUAL PENETRATION TO AVOID TUNNEL EFFECT Cherry Ave ?fan _ TILE ROOF CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT PROJECT FOR COHESIVE APPEARANCE TURF PRIMARY PLANTING TO CREATE CLEAN UNIFORM EDGE TO STREET DOUBLE ROW OF PALM TREES TO FIRST INTERSECTION Cherry Street Section Adjacent to Project Entry CITY OF rrEm. s . RANTCM CUC MONGA TITLE= PLANNM D€VL ON EXHIBIT Y 5� Eieva«on of Primary Entry y � L CUL-DE-SACS OPEN TO TRAIL --� PR6vlDES CONNECTION TO OPEN SPACE PEDESTRIAN TRAIL I RANDOM PLANTING d� OF SKYLINE BUFFER SAN SEVAINE WASH RIP —RAP BANK ,a San Sevaine Wash Edge Treatment CITE' OF E RANCM CCTC'�MCoT rt�m: �� {�� � 'rmi... PLILNNING DzvISM � rr s r : e,. �3 F lµ' .1 CITY 0 - F RANCHO k, tiiviL)NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 9, 1985 TO: Chairman and p n Members of the PJanni,ny Commission FROM., Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN - CITY OF FONTANA - Planning Commission review of land use alternatives for the Hunters Ridge Specific Plan on 580 acres of land within the City of Fontana, located on the north side of Summit Avenue, east of San Sevaine Creek,'west of the Devore- Freeway. I. ABSTRACT: The Cit of Fontana is currently preparing a Specific Plan for the aunt G ., property'`'t•ecently annexed.. The consultant selected to prepare.ithe document, the Planning Center, will present three preliminary land use alternatives to the City Council on October 16, 1986, Prior to this date, the Council is requesting informal comments from the Planning Commission. The 'Commission should focus their review of the alternatives on impacts of the Project as they relate to Rancho Cucamonga. II. BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has an opportunity to comment on the Specific Plan as provided - for in a settlement agreement with Fontana. The agreement resulted from litigation filed by the City upon action by LAFC.O removing the property from the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence and annexing it into the City of Fontana. In summary, the settlement agreement establishes that the gross density of the property wll'be no more than 4 units Per acre. The City of Fontana shall require payment of school - impaction fees and any other fees which may be identified as necessary mitjgation in the EIR or Specific Plan. The two cities, agree to coorarate in encouraging a regional park west of the site in the area,bf the San Sevaine Creek. In addition, the agreement specifies tl,at three land use alternatives be presented to .-ie Rancho Cucamonga' City Council and their comments will be given "serious consideration by the City of Fontana ". III. ISSUES: At the time of the agreement, the City Was concerned with the following issues: Unit Count: As shown on Exhibit "A", the only access to the site is currentiy through Rancho Cucamonga, so the total number of dwelling units within the project has a direct affect on this Ci`c * The Rancho C I ,. -conga oeneral Plan Land Use Map originally 1 ITEM V X11 PLANNING COMMISSSION 7 "- REPORT { HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIA. , -AN - CITY OF FONTANA L Il.. October 9, 19BS Page 2 f j designated the"`site Very Low Residential (less, than 2 du /ac) and Hillside Residential. Land Use Transitions: lire area within the City.vf Rancho Cucamonga soRth of Summit Avenue is designated as Very City Residential (half acre lots). Development on the site should provide an appropriate transition. r Circulation: Major access to the site is provided by an extension j- of Cherry Avenue. The Etiwani a Specific Plan shows Cherry Avenue J and Summit Avenue as only two Lanes adjacent to the � ^' project. %J Increased density on the site will necessitate expanding the road' widths. ` p property ill in Drainage Facilities: Development of the p y grease runoff and impact downstream properties, unless adequate` improvements are planned. Services /Commerical: Considering the isolated location o' the k. property, adequate schools, parks, water and sewer, and emergency services must be provided. In addition, traffic will pass through Etivanda traveling to and from commercial facilities. IV. SITE DESCRIPTION The 580 acre site is generally in - natural condition with few improvements. Buildings on the site include a club house for the Hunt Club, a stone residence and maintenance sheds-. Flood control improvements include a diversion dike and levee on the west side of the property and flood cuntrol levee crossing the southeast corner of the site. Electrical transmission lines cross through the north- central portion of the site. In addition, a MWO right -of -way traverses the southern portion of the site. V. LAND USE ALTERNATIVES: As mentioned, The Planning Center has develops_ three land use alternatives. The number of units in -each alternative ranges from the low of 1705 up to 2141. Approximately 350 acres of the site will be developed as residential and the three alternatives show average net densities ranging from 4.6 units per acre to 6.0 units per acre. Primary access is provided off Summit Avenue by a northerly extension_ of Cherr;.Iluenue. A brief' description of each alternative follows:_ Alternative One is based on the concept of graduation of density, from the most intense- along Summit Avenue `,Commercial, Multi- Family) to the 'least intense at the mouth of ian Sevaine Canyon. This alternative calls for 1947 units on 350 acres with an average density of 5.6 units per acre. Approximately 25% of the units are multi- family. Townhouses, apartments, and a five acre commercial Z°'�1 ?CANEiIGOMtISSi p,?'�RLF'OT-^ HUNTERS 2I4DG;`S EG �N' CITY` OF FOyl'ANA ' 4ctobei� 9, 1985�� . sitehe located ��ajong thar north side of Summit' Avenues alf_ ache Iots'are Vrgp6`sed t the •�adrth end of•wthe slater Seeo.pdaf-y scces"�s is provided ' 'tai umm�t Avende and a connection to th •-W4i planed x The, m A dear ge of rt this `alternative relJ65 to 11 11 use trans; �o1 n 'The townhouses, apartment §- and commer.:claw zom `r the, south end' of the. iitbr vfouId be inccmpatfba wir%"9 � a t ores o s youth of Sum ii Av�entte In` s addtOdn, to�nhouses an d4 60001 ;square foot lots: `arse Ipy�ogose'�'°"as a ±" transt joti� the ,po s��'hle reg�oiial pia k a��o� g,. San drainetG'�ee Regarding, culat din tYR streei,patt�er d arectsi'traff�c °t o Ran, Cucamonga 4y,isecondaryg aeces,; to the east. A positivkO ,­�ement under this alternative is the attempt to incprporatg}�some>of they existing mature vegetation (Peppers, r Eucalyptus). )} t � � I �r " { A 7yl &4 PLANNING COMM'I"SS ON REPORT - ;�: . HUNTERS RIbGF- SPEC`') . -AN y CITY OF FONTANA October 9 1985 _ Page 4 ' 4SOS(9!'hciCU6 ST Ict3' 7 tK6 fJwuin!!s ea' 15d eD IFS , J IV OF FMITANA it Page F4 j, t t C, �0. AlternAtn�re Sao " a1� for a i h. intens.it core about h . the �s Goo chi _k sand Mo,1 lami ly) with den�resx 1i1� dec�edsin boot n to nl^th ands outh< T i a tehr�ata e$ i` a ' o the Amos jnten off the +thre d 'its aot3�4acs proposes 2141 a' ofarfid� It ankeaYerxage ddsty ac. Appro�ma�teTy 3 thekall�ts are mu 41 �amyal' 'an fin' i hQ`4 It sin fa aljr o 500 A 6t� 7a�s. S�i�g�ie. ifaini � homes- on �'A . 720Dy4�sgt eoottotsa;g "ocae on the ntorfi s�3�ev of xut dnd L in Sa a SCE yon Oh Se onda^ny� futpr�e� accC`re hots ace lAocated, „ g , ass - i,s shown ° iw he' eas ' The proposed" _ens y of this alternaiitve wdUld' crea d— the greatest impact o Raicho Luca sngb The �ast.ma��or�ty' E un;ift are edytheri mult�j= fam3�yrrs�zrgveinly o x4500 °sgylare ",Foot lots,, Also,. f daes:'not appeartiai�the�'pr.'oposed mtenity,c:tbs'iders , ttse stop,,of'. ; the land acct$ a 9 ;. gar i"g� impacts As, th a C aware, side and rear; yard sibpes'sTgnificanuly reduce build�og pads and hard areas, particuiarlyP4on wail to - subTivi ton.'s rG�iwen these faOtors, massive grad &q the ,u retain�ng;walals -wili be- necessary to maintain the',nnit count. A: i � y ks, a _ �w• k a wit.' ° I l PLANNING COMM18t Dips jr ---RE PORT HUNTERS RIDGE SPECIFY. _ -AN — CITY OF FONTANA r October 9, MS Page 6 i 7'.JOirfy}t `9.? ALL' ISO 7.0 ur FF Pit tK 0 ;►u�uwe7 rto „g eae F�Cr iPc`RMh r } ^. taw ra �� a. i l y , ` s. Tot W4 ' X.— aA, oprm Iwo 0 _.� 4 7 �7i i ■. PLANNkiVG� �Q�fs liu" ttEPQRT� � N!!YTERS ii,�OGi SPED tILL —N -CITY OF FONTANA " p October•9,,1Q$, Page 7 j y na Alternative Tutee has the lowest densft with 1705 units on 370' " acres, ?he au -Ykage densr #y of res�de��t'gj property, is f4:� dwe;11fng units,.er net sere: F `k1al -aoS'e lots are- �ShownT -on tOe,- torth, side of StiRm�t and alaitg 'the" extensfo* of Cherry Apartment units at �- O d4 el linos per core ire proposed Af the t th 3. of San S�vaitic Canyon dn: �ommgrciat. Use is provided.. Primary, access' frm they �. east aslNpltnde . This alternrdtM've f0l a U40v4 unilt count;, ;hal`f acre Iota, at-01s along the south #V;' 4c^t�,bougId4ry,,, anxd I wor,sangle family 10ts a' uab San Seuazine CrEie „and. Ppmary circtrla ion,�o tha, easy: The � concern i "s the: �apar in San, t meiits. sevaine anyq x, Thdugh of 411 11 d effect on 12ancNo OucatitQnga, tie proposed -. net `densjrc'�; of a0! units , per acre wiJI hqe .'a severe impadt oak the character file area and will require subit°antial alteratl: P av existing land forms. Ask- ;r �k tom: 1 , PLANN C IS 0 =l REPORT HUNTER }2IDGE SPE Fi.. -AN -CITY OF CtINTANA 0tabe`' 9, I985 Page 8 � A 771 _a YH 7J7 9 L^X _: 6 D� srmz+irar�us M� i�ag ■ niwf. �s9+vv tffYf7�1lS ttJf/fL 71cv :..a+c ■ 9ilK [wc vu�c. � YSIN J 4� r pLAN`CCOa�lS'OT EPORT `x U HNTERS itiUG_E PEC CITY OF FONTANA Oc tober y;i +985'' Page y VI. SUMMARY No one aiEe� ate ".ve seems to provide the aptam�am scenari with" e petit to imp c s (.1 ,'anc€ao Cucamonga.. However y Alternai�we �;, Three appea s -to ,bi: tyre most acceotabl in terms of its relai~ions`rip'toRanctro Cucamonga„ ,ail that it' incorpo ates ,several characi?eristics, important to the City, as outlined be ?pw 1. Totz yal taunt is somewhat lower (±1700 du's), reflecting more sensr4twi :- y to suer corls�traints and surrounding land uses; z` " 2. A circutlati,onsysirem °With depends heavily' o,� access to Ounqan. �* Canyon (to th`eleastI, rather than emphasizing Summit and Cheery Avenues; ` 3. Half -acre "estate" lots adjacent to Summit Avenue and other areas designated for less, than 2 du/ac in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan; , 4. Lack of commerical or other intensive use activities; and ' 5. A mix or dwelling types (single •family vs. multi,- family) more in tune with existing and planned development 4n the area. r In addition, the final concept selected should facilitate tNi following: 1. Preservation and sensitivity-to existing natural features and land forms, part icu;ar4ly in •regard to mature ve'getatioj- -apd grading; - w 2. Sensitivity to natural hazards, such as slope stabil-il�. flooding and seismic conditions; 3. Integration of San ;, =,aine Greek into the design of the projecx through appropraite 'orientation and land use transitions; and I- 4. Regional trail connections as outlined in the City's General Plan and West Valley Foothills Plan. { VIT' RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission should review the proposed alternatives as they relate-to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Comments should be referred to the City Council by minute action for their review on October 16, 1985, Y ,r a i Ov t�� -ak.-S-AA T7�°k i _ —gin• 1,117 711 xxr j c»L so �� iit� �, '�+' i ' 7•� L;...'�•., � l s •l f t��'� rl r. tA� r `� • �1�1t �'ii, -. �a�� .- � ����`� � � � � -� - � ��•' >� .'^� yaw'- �"''•�,i�1'r►- „r- ,.'..lr ain L.'ti °' %i��7 f f rrrr��ia, 1 f I \�, �. a_ h �+� /1G.J' • • -' a.. v��o r �%'r• "L� * / �i �r''`'' V• 1 •�7t .! �_/r � � .: r� � `l. MC..�a Y�v_+' Y fib,,.' lftic�,n ��� .�,•” =o� _�� t� '`J; t•' -;;i`r SAN_G'i46lEs; r _�� 1 '� ��1`•f! -�M�1 j1,,,� �+1� i:N ~ f,�� �niF f7 -,^.. ;-� x �'I ,."`� . -.�(i ''.•f �1 M1 �S,.r,.,.- :ter _... l: ``..r• yY , 7.�ti�/ ,z 3 .s`.• ,..vim �., �... /� ` _ ` � _.i.�.s' -:KL � �'f! 4 � lam•. � F ` k w —DRAINAGE • CQUC'i5E mss• f ''•i A lSt . f •� ��dL �r��� ,. �i Z RESERVOIR • 2/ -7 •.,�� Stouca � a - �1 N'OR'1 H _ CITY OF ITt:M: or s RANCHO CUCAMOINGA TITLE = jCAL ,,LAfp _ PU NNM DIV ISK)N E. HIBI T- c. i `b V. HUNTERS :RIDGE SPECIFIC RAN - CITY OF FONTANA - Planning Commmission review of land use alternatives ;or the Hunter's :Ridge Specific Plan on 580 acres of land within the 'City of Fontana, located north of Summit Avenue, east of San Sevaine "Greek, west of the Devore freeway, Curt Johnston, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Chitiea statold that she was concerned with the overall density of the project, and particularly with transition of density. She stated that Alternatives l and 2 should not even be considered; possibly something more along the lines of Alternative 3 in terms of circulation and transition of density. She was also concerned with the large number 0 small single family homes. She suggested that preservation and sensitivity to historical structures should be considered and that fire and wind hazard should also be addressed, along with the feasibility of requiring fire sprinklers. Commissioner Rempel stated that he shared these concerns and das also concerned with access. He advised that the locaton of streets going west needs to be delineated and was concerned that street connections were not shown an the map. He was also concerned that this may be the last review th- Planning Commission will be afforded and was unhappy with not seeing something in the finer detailed stages. Mr. Johnsto.-, advised that the West Valley Foothills Plan show a majors east /west corridor north of Summit; however,, the idea was that San Sevaine Creek would be a logical boundary between the ti,o cities and since a regional park is planned for that location it was thought that there would not be a street connection there. Conanissioner Barker didn't Tike the idea of taking all the traffic through Rancho Cucamonga's streets. He advised that the impact on traffic is going to be considerable especially with this increase in density. Further, that the issues recognized by staff in the report capsu14zes the concerns of the Commission in their review of any other project with regard to transition of density, seismic, and compatibility. He stated that the list given by staff is a starting point along with the criteria used in the Commission's approval of the projects to the west and adjacent area. He stated that this project must be compatible and should refect the same kinds of standards, sizes,`and other criteria used by Rancho Cucamonga to the ft,ll" extent possible. He considered all three alternatives unacceptable. Commissioner Chitiea questioned why all three alternatives show open space and parks in the same location. Mr. Johnston replied that approximately 2f3 of the park nand is going to be located within utility corridors. I Motion: Moved; by Chitiea, seconded by Barker., that all three alternatives presented were unacceptable. Staff to prepare comments to the applicant. Motion carried by the follw-ming votes Planning Commission Minutes -16 October 9, 1985 R , AY£� COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BARKER, REMPEL NOES; COMMISSIONERS: - -`WONE 4 f�f$SENT: COMMISSIONERS. ` MCNIEL, STOUT - cart -?Ied DIRECTOR'S REPORTS W. HIGHLAND AV`l1E WALLS AND LANDSCAPE` DESIGN - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - Oral Report Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. He requested that the Commission direct staff as to whether a test section of the wall should be constructed or if they f�',t comfortable enough to allow the applicant to "nstruct the entire wall. Commissioner Rempel stated that the proposed design would make an attractive wall and would have no'problem with constructing the entire wall. Commissioner Chitiea agreed, Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Chitiea, to approve the Highland Avenue walls and Landscape Design as presented. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, CHi7IEA, BARKER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: M. -NIEL, STOUT - carried #fir *:k X. TERRA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DESIGN WOLFF, LANG CHRISTOPHER Oral Report - — - Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Mr. Coleman asked the Commission to consider the option of continuing this item for review by the full Commission. Commissioner Rempel stated that it is not known what the time line is that has 9 been established by the School District. Vice- Chairman B,rker was concerned with the aesthetic appearance of the structures and that the -Fact that they would be there for a trpmendcus amount j of time until the state finds some way of funding school buildings. Planning Commission Minutes ­17- October 9, 1985 3 r,