Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1986/05/14 - Agenda Packet
0701 -0 o 5-14-86 P,C, Agenda ;Packet Page 11 C. 8 \ / \ ( // � 2§ co . aƒ / � \� ®0 ol 2 . , QTY Or i Q PLANNING X10NL JNL 1Ts sIVN .G 1MMIL i "`• ., I977 r WEDNESI}AY May 14, 1986 7:00 p.m.. F LIONS PARR COMMUYITY CENTEk 9161 BASE LIMP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA,LIFORMA ACT10,N L Pledge of Allegiance IL Ron Cal " Commis. loner Barker y Commissioner Hempel X Commissioner Chitiea x Commissioner Stout X Commissioner McNiel7Excused IIL Announcements VIPROVED 4 -0 -1 IV. Approval of lftutes I March 26, 1986 i V. Consent Calendar The•foIlowing Consen! Calendar items are expected to be routine APPROVED 4-0 -1 and non- controve.__,.Y. They -k;4-11 be acted on by the Commission at one time without - *iismasion. If anyone has concern over any item, f fE14S C, E, G PULLED FOR it should be removed for discussion. DISCUSSION 1 A. FINAL TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10245 I ASSAD A custom lot subdivision of 10 acres of land into 15 lots located in the Very Lot `Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) at the southwest corner of Haven and Hillside - APN 201-111-14. I B. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 3383 - BANKS - located on the north side of Base Line Road, `Wrest of East Avenue'- APN 227- 131 -29. ;` C. Return walls /fences C. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 11997 - NORDIC - Design subject to Design Review of ootgdnts and elevations for an appro,ad Review. Committee review Tentative Tract of a 19 2esident al lot subdivision on 9.75 and approval. acres of Iand in the Very Low District located at the southeast earner of Hillside and Beryl, - APN 1061-621 -01. �e._` �4 D. TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-02 - LIONCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY - The development 'of three warehouse distribution buildings totaling 463,210 square feet on 22.09 ae,*es of land in the M dmum Impact Heavy Industrial Zone (Subarea 9) located at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue :qnd 8th Street - APN 229- 111• -08, 09. E. Applicant to be E. FINAL TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12171 - notified of trail STEPHENSON - A cOtom lot subdivision of six lots on 3.5 requirement. acres of land in the Very Low (VL) District, located at' the northwest corner of Musman. Avenue and Whilaway Street - APN 511- 06 -07. F. PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR A JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SITE IN TERRA VISTA G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12991 - SHELBOURNE - A total residential subdivision and design review of 49 single family lots on 56a :acres of land in the Low Medium Residential District, loc( 1 at the south side of Lemon Avenue, 500 feet 'east of Ar%, Abald Avenue APN 201 - 252 -21, 22. (Continued from April 23, 1986 meeting.) { H. APPROVAL OF BASE LINE 'ROAD AND 19TH STREET BEAUTIFICATION CONCEPTS VL Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which a�cernec'. individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. 'Please wait to be recognized by the Cha;rman and address the Commission - by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual.' for each project. L. APPROVED 4 -0 -1 L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13114 - SCHULTZ - A 21 custom lot subdivision on 5.5 acres of land in the Low Residential. District (2 -4 du/ac) located at the southeast corner of Vineyard and Calle Del Prado - APN 208- 921 -03, 04. (Continued from April 9, 1986 meeting.) " J. APPROVED REVOCATION J. REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 714 - VFW a 4 -0 -1 - A meeting hall serving alcoholic beverages in an existing building with a lease space of 5000 square feet on 3.47 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 3) Category, located at 8751 Industrial bane - APN 2016- 031 -74. (Continued from April 23, 1986 meeting) 5 K. ENVIRONIVIEFTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMrr 89-0-3 - AJA -The development of one I-story office REVOM -------- building totaling 25—,990 square feet, two 1-story Research & Development/Office buildings totaling 38,940 sqt!are feet and two I-story multi-tenant industrial buildings totaling 28,228 square feet on 7.09 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) and Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street - APN 209-401-01. �tRelated File: DR 85-45) APPROVED 4-0-1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPM-ENT REVIEW 85-45 - YJA - The deTelopment of two office buildings totaling 000 square feet, and two I-story multi- ten ant industrial buildings totaling 39,S-18 square feet on 7.09 acres of land in the Industrial Park D;irict (Subarea 6), and the Haven A-venue Civerlay District, located at the northeast corner of Haven Ai'7',riue and Acacia Street - APN 209-401- 01. (Previously Subfiatted as Conditionr-1 Use Permit 86-u L, APPROVED 4-0-1 L. Slope —improvements to be ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES�-17AENT AND TENTATIVE TR��CT 13059 7C completed prior to occupancy - WILLIAM LYON MPAN Y - A residential t! Bet subdivision of 25.8 acres withiiT—the 'fictoria Plarned of first unit; conditions of Community (Low Medium Residential - 4-8 dwelling unit�'per TT 13022 to be complied with prior tn occupancy of first acre) into 137 lots located north of the Southern Pacific unit; alplicant to be respor.- Railroad and east of Deer Creek Channel - APN 202-211-13, 38. sible for slope maintenance until license/agreement M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT is obtained from railroad. . 13057 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A residentia tract subdivision of 2.2.5-5 —acres -wiffin the Victoria Planned M. APPROVED 4-0-1 Commttnity (Low-Medium Residential - 4-8 dyielling units per same7_6n-ditions as Item L. acre) into 147 lots, Ineated at the southeast corner of Highland Avenue and the. Deer Creek Chan '�-APIX202-211- 13,38. CON, 0 JUNE 11 N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSh.'RNT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13058 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A residential traef subdivision of 28.51 acres within the Victoria Planned Community (Medium Residential - 4-14 dwelling units per acre) into 201 lots, I cated on the west side of Victoria C" Groves Loop Road, S07 of Highland Avenue - APN 202-211- 1-31,38. 0. APPROVED 4-0-1 0. same�-conditions as Item L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE, TRACT —residential 13CSO - %JLLIAM 0-170—N COMPANY - X tract subdrviiron of 19.5 acres Ti—tbin the Victoria Planned Community (low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) into 86 lots, located r. the northwest corner of Millilken and the SouthernPacific Railroad - APN 202-211-13, 38. P. APPROVED 4-0-1 2, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12802 (REVISED) =LEWIS HOMES -The total development of a residential subdivision of 11-0.6- acres in the Low Medium Residential District (48 dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Community into 103 lots, located on the south side of Moutitain View Drive, east of Spruce Avenue - APN 1,077-091-03. APPROVED 4-0-1_ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE -RACT 12835 (REVISED) - OVERSEAS REALTY ENTRRPRl*__ES_ Multi-family residential devgo-pment ecUp-rising 132 condominium units on 9.52 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (3-14 dwelling units per acre) located east of Vineyard, i- 600 feet -.orth of Arrow Highway - APN 208-251-05. In addition, applicant has requested a Tree Removal Permit to remove the norther,Pi windrow. APPROVE; 4 -0_i R. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7912 - HAHN TENANT INTERIORS, INC. - A division of 1.57 acres' of land into 3 parcels for condominium purposes within Subarea I of the Industrial Specific Plan located on the timth side of 8th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN 207-271 - 53, 54 a-,id 55. V& Old Business S. Staff directed to S. TERRA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #1 - Review of forward comments to revised elevations School District. VXM New Business T. APPROVED APPEAL 4-0-1 T. APPEAL OF A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF MINOR Resolution to be provided DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 8&05 - CALIFORNIA FINISHED on June 11 consent calendar. METALS - A request to allow a 5,460 square foot metal canopy addition to an existing manufacturing building located at 9133 Center Street. U. DETERMINED CONSISTENT U. PRELIMINARY REVIEW 86-28 - MASCkRENAS - A 4-0-1 To_nsistf.,nEy determination between ',he Foothill Corridor Interim Policies and a commercial office building located on the south sit'a of Foothill Boulevard, east of Turner Avenue - APN 208•-".3"30. DL Director's Reports V. Staff provided with V. POLICY FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING further direction. OVERHEAD UTILITIES X. CommMon Busiress } a I A B►. Fublie Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which Flo no': already appear on this agenda. 6 11:15 P.M. XUL Adjournment The planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shalt be heard only with the consent of the Commission. Iff ,K s i ;b A CITY OF RANCHO C'L'G1,MONGA. PL- AITII1NG CON&IISSION, - AGENDA, WEDNESDAY May 14, 1986 7 :00 p.m. LIONS PARS COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA L Pledge of Allegiance IL Roll Call Commissioner Barker Commissioner Rempel Commissioner - Chitiea Commissioner Stout Commissioner McNiel III. Announcements Approval of Minutes March 26, 1986 Consimt Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routh,,e and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed, for discussion. A. FINAL TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TP. , 10246- -. ' ASSAD. A• custom lot subdivision o 10 acres o ,, ±aik into 15 ':ides loc$ted in the Very Low Density ,$esidential'Distr''i+ct (less than 2 dwelling..-units per acre) al the southwest corner of Haven and Hi}Lside -AFN 201- 111 -14. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 3383 - BANKS - located on the r::zrth side of Base Line Road, west of East Avenue - APN 227- 331, -29.- C. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 11997 NORDIC -'Design Rev?ew of footprints and elevations or E approved Tentative Tract of a 19 residential lot, subdivision on 9.75 acres of land in the Very Low Distriet located at the southeast corner of Hillside and Beryl - APN 1061-621-01. k� D. TIME EXTENSION' FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -02 - LION COLN PROPERTY COMPANY - The development cf Three warehouse distribution buildings totaling 463,210 square feet on 22.09 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial Gone (Subarea 9) located at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and 8th Street APN 229 - 111 -08, 09. E. FINAL TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12171 STEPHENSON - A`custom lot subdivision of six lots on 3.3 acres of land in the Very Low (VL) District, located at the northwest corner of Klusman Avenue and Whilaway Street - APH,, 511- 06 -07. F. PROPERTY -ACQUISITION FOR A JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SITE IN TERRA VLSTA G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12991 SHELBOUERE A total residential subdivision and design review of 49 single family lots on 8.9 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential District, located at the south side of Lemon Avenue, 500 feet east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201 - 252 -21, 22, (Continued from April 23, 1986 meeting.) H. APPROVAL OF ?LASE LINE ROAD AND 19TR ai-REET BEAUTIFICATION CONCEPTS VL ,Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice �heir opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13114 - SCHULTZ - A 21 custom lot subdivision on 5.5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2- 4,du/ae), lq -lted at the southeast corner of Vineyard and Calls Jel Prado - APN 208- 921 -03, 04. (Continued from April 9, 1986 meeting.) J. REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT' 84 -14 - VFW - A meeting hall serving aico!,tolie beverages in an existing building with a lease space of 5000 square feet on 3.47 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 3) Category, located . at 8751 Industrial Lane - APN 209- 031 -74. (Continued from April 23, 1986 meeting) W D. TIME EXTENSION' FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -02 - LION COLN PROPERTY COMPANY - The development cf Three warehouse distribution buildings totaling 463,210 square feet on 22.09 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial Gone (Subarea 9) located at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and 8th Street APN 229 - 111 -08, 09. E. FINAL TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12171 STEPHENSON - A`custom lot subdivision of six lots on 3.3 acres of land in the Very Low (VL) District, located at the northwest corner of Klusman Avenue and Whilaway Street - APH,, 511- 06 -07. F. PROPERTY -ACQUISITION FOR A JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SITE IN TERRA VLSTA G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12991 SHELBOUERE A total residential subdivision and design review of 49 single family lots on 8.9 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential District, located at the south side of Lemon Avenue, 500 feet east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201 - 252 -21, 22, (Continued from April 23, 1986 meeting.) H. APPROVAL OF ?LASE LINE ROAD AND 19TR ai-REET BEAUTIFICATION CONCEPTS VL ,Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice �heir opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13114 - SCHULTZ - A 21 custom lot subdivision on 5.5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2- 4,du/ae), lq -lted at the southeast corner of Vineyard and Calls Jel Prado - APN 208- 921 -03, 04. (Continued from April 9, 1986 meeting.) J. REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT' 84 -14 - VFW - A meeting hall serving aico!,tolie beverages in an existing building with a lease space of 5000 square feet on 3.47 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 3) Category, located . at 8751 Industrial Lane - APN 209- 031 -74. (Continued from April 23, 1986 meeting) K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -03 - AJA - The development of one 1 -story office building totaling 22,990 square feet, two 1 -story Research be Development /Office buildings totaling 38,940 square feet and two 1- story multi-tenant industrial buildings totaling 28,228 square feet on t.09 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) and Haven Avenue Overlay .District, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue affil Acacia Street. - APN 209 - 401 -01. (Related File: DR 85 -45) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -45 AJA - The development of two office buildings totaling 62,000 square feet and two 1 -story multi- tenant industrial buildings totaling 38,228 square feet on 7.09 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6), and the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northeast corner of Havens Avenue and Acacia Street - APN 209 -4017 01. (Previously' Submitted as Conditional Use Permit 86 -03) L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13059 - W" LIAM LYON COMPANY - A residential tract: subdivision of 25.8 acres within the Victoria Planned,: Community (Low Medium Residential - 4 -8 dwelling units per acre) into 117 lots located north of the Southern Pacific Railroad and east of Deer Creek Channel APN 202 - 211 -13, 38. M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13057 WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A residential tract subdivision of 22.55 acres within the Victoria Planned Community (Low - Medium Residential 4 -8 dwelling units per acre) into 147 lots, located at the southeast corner;, of Highland Avenue and the Deer Creek Channel - APN 202 -2`,17 13, 38. N. ENVIRONMENTAL EPSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT '1305�8 - �3' LIAM ?,YON COMPANY - A residential tract subdivision of 28.51 acres within the Victoria Planned Community {Medium Residential - 4 -14 dwelling units per acre) into 201 lots, located on the west side of Victoria Groves Loop load, south of Highland Avenue - APN 202 -211- 13, 38. i O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13060 WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A residential tract subdivision of 19.5 acres within the Victoria Planned Community (low Residential, 2 -4 dwelling units per acre) into 86 lots, located at the northwest corner of Milliiken and the Southern Pacific Railroad - APN 202 - 211 -13 38. _.r r; rr P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12802 REVISED - LENIS HOMES -The total development of a residential subdivision of 16.6 acres in the Low Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Community into 103 lots, located on the south side of Mountain View Drive, east of Spruce Avenue - APN 1077- 091 -03. @. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12835 REVISED - OVERSEAS ; RFALTY ENTERPRISES - Multi amily residential development comprising 132 condominium units on 9.52 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) located east of Vineyard, f 600 feet north of Arrow Highway - APN 208- 251 -05. In addition, applicant has requested a Tree Removal Permit to remove the northerly windrow. R. ENV, RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7912 - HAHN TRNAFr INTERIORS, INC. A division o 1.57 acres of land inter% 3 pare@! for condominium purposes within Subarea 1 of the Industrial Specific Plan located on the north side of 8th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN 207 -271- 53, 54 and 55. VII. Old Business S_ TERRA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #1 Review of revised elevations VIIL New Business T. APPEAL OF A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -05 - CALIFORNIA FINISHED METALS - A request! allow a 5,460 square foot metal canopy addition to an existing manufacturing building located ac 9133 Center Street. U. PRELEMiARY REVIEW 86 -28 - MASCARENAS A consistency determination between the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies and a commercial office building located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Turner Avenue - APN 208- 33 -30. IS. Direc'tor's Reports V. POLICY FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF E. ISTING , OVERHEAD UTILITIES t X. Commission Business t.= 'I r =�•: a4a 19' XL Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. ffi V� jomment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an ZI p.m. adjournment .time. If items go beyond that. time, they shall by heard only with the consent of the Commission. `f., \ I P-1 VICINITtir" MAP r VICINITtir" MAP CITY OF VMCHO CUCAMONGA; PUNNSING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting March 26, 1986 Chairman Dennis Stout called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Stout then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: David Barker, Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNiel, Herman Rempel, Dennis Stout ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Pan Coleman, Senior Planner; Bruce Cook, Associate Planner; Nancy Fong, Associate Planner; Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer; James Markman, City Attorney; Dino Puteino, Assistant Planner; Janice Reynolds, Secretary ANNOUNCEMENTS Brad Buller, City Planner, asked for a consensus from the Commission relative to the date for the Planning Commission field tour of the City. Mr. Buller suggested May 17, 1986. This date was accepted by the Commission. Mr. Buller additionally announced that the City Council approved the contract s•1 z.ting forma- Planning Network as the consultant for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Chitiea, carried, to approve the February 26, 1986 Planning Commissions Minutes as submitted. Commissioner McNiel abstained from vote since he was absent during that meeting. :r. ± y 4q CONSENT CALENDAR A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -36 - HIMES- PETERS MODEL - he development of—a-7-42,113 square TRW ware ouse s rims inn acs ity for hobby model products on 1.9 acres of land in the General Indusrial /Rail Served District (Subarea 10), located at the northeast corner of 7th Strew.;, and Bridgeport Place - APN 229 -261- 71. Commissioner Chitiea requested tte item be removed for discussion. She was concerned that the corner post was too dark in color and suggested that it be a lighter shade of blue, more in keeping with the rendering. Motion: Moved oy Chitiea, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried to adopt the consent calendar with direction to staff relative to the corner post color. * * * * PUBLIC HEARINGS B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT,ANO TENTATIVE TRACT 12991 - SHELOURNE - A total residential subdivision a' -; design review for 49 singe famiy ots on b.9 acres of land in the Low Mediu:i Residential District, located at the south side of Lemon Avenue, 5001 feet east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201- 252 -21, 22. (Continued from December 11, 1986 meeting.) Chairman Stout asked if a representative of this project was present. No representative was present. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Commissioner Barker asked for direction relative to a continuance for this project. James Markman, City Attorney, stated that since staff had made telephone contact with the applicant who agreed to a continuance, the Co;iaiissin cauld either continue the project or deny the project tonight and direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial without prejudice for Commission con,ideration at their next meeting. He recommended denial of the project at this time since the time line for a decision by the Commission had expired under the Subdivision Map Act. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, to deny Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 12991. A Resolution of Denia, without Prejudice is to be placed on the April 9, 1986 Planning Commission agenda consent calendar. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, MCNIEL, CHITIEA, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE r 0 Planning Commission Minutes -2- March 26, 1986 V. i It ABSENT: COMNiSSIONERS: NONE - carried C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSME?.`T AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13114 - SCHULTZ - A 21 custom of s! ubdivision on 3'acres of an in the Low e_s en ffa District (2 -4 du /ac) located at the southeast corner of Vineyard and Calle Del Prado - APN 208 - 921 -03 and 04. (Continued from February 12, 1986 meeting.) Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report and gave a slide presentation of the project site. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, requested the following modifications to the Standard Conditions: Page 5, Condition L -2 modified to require 25 t—tal feet of right -of -way dedication on Calle Del. Prado; Page 6, Condition M -2 to be checked; Page 6, Condition M -7 to bt Flfeckeud relative to Calle Del Prado. Commissioner Chitiea requested that Planning Condition 1 of the Resolutica require review and approval by the Planning Commission or Design Review Committee. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. W.M. Schultz, applicant, stated that the Commission's concernz have been addressed where possible to do so without creating engineering problems or obstruction of views. Walter Gu €tafson, 9000 Calle Del Prado, Rancho Cucamonga, was concerned with the loss of his view to the south and requested that a restriction be put on the proje,:t that multi -level homes could not be built on the top four lots. There were no further coin ;, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Barker stat_ I the Development Code Amendment should have been discussed before cons5c_ :ion of this project. He was concerned that the latitude which the amendment was intended to afford *hese types of developments may not have been adequately addressed at this time. Commissioner Rempel stated that this was an ideal site -.to budid true custom homes because it offers some aesthetic value as far as building split level houses on a piece of property ra her than to pad eph house out. He pointed out that Mr. Gustafson's property is 19 feet high than the pad below him; therefore, a two story home probably would not affect his view. Commissioner Chitiea stated that overall padding should be looked carefully into and not cane on an individual basis due to the complexity of the slopes adjoining one another. Further, that maximum creativity should be allowed in cases such as this. She additionally stated that if the grading comes back in groups of 4 or more, not only each lot should be looked alu individually, but the grading of the entire project should be reviewed to retain the natural character of.the land along with consideration of the neighbors both above and below the prviect. She was not satisfied with the grading of the pro. ?a:ct as presented at this time. Planning Commission Minutes -3- March 26, 1986 Commissioner McNiel agreed that alternative methods should be explored to provide usable ,area, but also realized the difficulty of moving water off the property to protect people surrounding it. Commissioner Bar "er pointed out that if it saves an attractive piece of property and makes it compatible with the surrounding property, the City is ,tot obligated to make :;ure that t.iere are '�he maximum number of lots on any piece of property. Jerry Crant, Build — ifficial, advised that it is extremely difficult to treat lots indiviau<_ _ )n a suludivislon ct this size; they have to be treated as a whole from a grading standpoint. Commissioner Rempei stated that there are other ways to insure ttiat there is proper drainage for the project such a:; a drainage easement on the south and east side of the property. Further, that this is a valuable and beautiful piece of property and the houses should be designed to flit it. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, addressed the usable yard area and _advised ghat this issue had been booked at by the Grading Committee. The grading plan as proposed on exhibit C, which depicted looking at each lot on an individual ba;,, . Raul d achieve this. Comr licaer Barker stated that this design relies primarily on cut which is W` !ld be limited as much as possible. He pointed out that deck usage as , at native is not addressed in this partic0 ar design. Chairman Stout stated that some type of compromise should be reached somewhere between a total grading concept and the concept that some type of special treatment would have to be done on the design of houses to make them more closely Fit that type of terrain, He felt the project needed more work and could not make a decision on it at this time. Brad Buller, City Planner;, asked for a consensus of direction from the Commission. Chairman Stout stated that this is a fine piece of engineering given the .onst- O nts of looking for paded lots with certain buildable areas and certain usable spaces in addition to that. However, the question is that a couple of policy concerns were apparently not sufficiently addressed in the project or proposed Code Amendment. He wanted to see how these policy concerns could ba addressed by this project and what affect they would have cr, the engineering aspects. Mr. Schultz was concerned that the Commission was going away from a great deal of engineering study and compromise on both sides towards something that does not relate to the physical nature of the site. He stated that this site is not one which could be developed into large custom homes sites, given the constraints of surrounding development and conditions. Chairman Stout replied that the Commission was not implying that a certain size house or design should be used, but suggested that an innovative design could be used that is not so outrageously nxpei ;sive that it can't take advantage of that location. Planning Commission Minutes -4- March 25, 1986 Commissioner Chitiea stated, that the grading plan needs refinement while still dealing with those issues. Chairman S -out agreed that refinement was necessary and wanted to see some conditions relative to the type of construction with respect to some suggestions about methods of making it fit the topography better than a flat slab. Further, that decking could be used for usable space so that the'lot would not have to be padded out to the point where all building space and usable space is on one flat plane, and that pad sizes should be reduced and the grading softened a bit, Chairman Stout asked for the applicant's consent to a continuance of two weeks. Mr. Schultz consented to a two week contlauance. Brad Buller, City Planner, advised That staff would not be able to come back with a detailed gradinj plan in two weeks. Chairman Stout replied that he was not concerned al+out the detailed aspect IYlt wanted to know if these problems can be solved by these types of conditions. Motion: Mov 4, by darker, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to continue the public hewing for Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 11314 to the April 9, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. Chairman Stout announced that the following items were related and Mould be heard concurrently by the Commission: D. VARIANCE 86 -02 - SMITH - A request to re��ice minimum lot .depth from 150 �r fee a .3 acre parcel in the Very Low Residential District (up to 2 du /ac) located on the south side of Strang Lane, east of Carnelian Avenue - APN 1061- 271 -07. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9349 - SMITH - A division of 1.3 acres of land in -to 2 c-xce s in a Very Low Resid enttal District (up to 2. du /ac) located on the south side of Strang Lane, east of Carnelian Avenue APN 1061 - 271 -07. (Continued from February 26, 1986 meeting.) Bruce Cook, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report relative to the Variance. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report relative to the Parcel Map. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. t; Judy Smith, 8861 Strang Lane, applicant, requested approval of the Variance and Parcel Map. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission Minutes -5- March 2v, 1986 F r Commissioner Chitiea didn't think that mak €Ng the street wider at that point would make a difference at all. She advised that she didn't want to set a precedent, but in this case making the street wider would not help. Commissioner Barker agreed and further stated that to widen the street would create a monster rather than solve a problem. He was in favor of approving the Variance and Parcel Map. Commissione% McNiel stated that widening the street create a more negative affect than a positive one. Chairman Stout stated that this issue was weig4ing a policy created to protect residents of the City from poor circulation and the problems of taking over substandard streets after periods of time against fundamental fairness and hardship. In this case widening the street in this area would create a hardship and basically people who live on that street would have to forfeit major portions of landscaping to help oat the person who lives at the end of the street. Since the area is already built up,- the street widening is not going to have a major visual affect. He felt the City's interest in straightening out the street at this time is far outweighed by the hardship which would be created. He agreed that the policy should exist but should not be enfced in a rigid manner such that in it defies logic. Commissioner Rempel felt that those people who had similar applications prior to this one should be contacted and advised that they could now develop without widening the street. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Barker, to adopt the Resolution approving Variance 86 -02. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, BARKER, CHITXEA, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENTA: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried Motion: Moved by Chi tirza, seconded by McNiel, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Parcel Map 9537. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, BARKER, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9537 LOZIER CORPORTATION - A division of 26.4 acres into 2 parcels in t5e General Industrial' designation (Slibarea 2) locatei east of Vinrvard Avenue between Arrow Route and 9th Street - APN 209- J12 -10. Planning Commission Minutes -6- March 26, 1986 s Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Mr. Stofa presented,a revision to the City Engineer's Report Condition G -2 relative t. the drive approach on 9th Street. Commissi -:her Chitiea questioned the adoption of a policy regarding undergrounding of utilities as stated * +a the staff report. Chairman Stout replied that this was ,'one through minute action. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. John Ascheris, 16192 Von Karmen Aienue, Newport Beach, requested an amendment to condition G -3(a) to require in -lieu fee to be paid prior to building permits for any parcel of the project. Chairman Stout asked if parcel one or two would develop first. Mr. Ascheris replied that it was not known at this time which parcel would develop first. Chairman Stout stated that parcel one is extremely critical since that street is an entry to the city. He advised the applicant to take a close look at it for aesthetic and landscaping treatmant. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, suggested that the in -lieu fee be required prior to building permits for parcel 2. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Parcel Map 9537, with amendments to the City Engineer's Report Condition G -2 to allow flexibility of the reciprocal drive approach on 9th Street, and Condition G -3(a) to require in -lieu fee for utility undergrounding to be paid prior to issuance of building permits for Parcel 2. Mot'lon carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, MCNIEL, CHITIEA, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried G. CONSIDIERATION OF REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -14 - VFW - A request; to operate A meeting hall and to serve alcohol ic— beverage in an existing building with a lease space of 5,000 square feet on 3.47 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 3) category located at 8751 Industrial Lane - APN 209- 031 -84. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to set the public hearing for consideration of revocation of Conditional Use Permit 84 -14 on April 23, 1986. Planning Commission Minutes -7- March 26, 1986 i\ r 8:25 p.m. - Planning Commisssion Recessed 8:35 p.m. - Planning (.,.mission Reconvened with all members present * * * ** H. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -01 - DIVERSIFIED - The development of a 22,000 square foot retail di ing (Payless) with outdoor sales nursery within an approved integrated shopping center on 11.41 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commercial District located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Lemon Avenue'- APN 201 - 271 -53. Nancy Fong, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout advised that a letter had been received frt.n Mr: O'Meara which proposed a language modification for condition 2. He asked if Ms. Fong had reviewed the letter. Ms. Fong replied that she had received the letter. Chairman ,tout was concerned that the applicant proposed to store items outside other than what was approved at Design Review. Commissioner Chitiea requested that natural rock be specified f;,r use on the building exterior rather than use of synthetic rock. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Barbara Sisson, representing the applicant, presented photographs of outdoor areas of other projects which are currently used by the applicant. Chairman Stout asked if the applicant intended to take all items in and out of the store every night. Ms. Sisson replied that this was normal practice. Chairman Stout stated that synthetic veneer was used on the Lucky's store and similar material on the "Ye4n project. He had no problem with veneer and had seen some which appear very natural, but some are obviously synthetic. He questioned how this czuld be conditioned that it be called out to have review. Dan Colemen, Sc,iior Planner, suggested that the condition be modified to require staff review and approval of a sample. Chairman Stout stated that if it doesn't look like natural river rock, it's defeating the purpose. Commissioner Chitiea requested that the sample submitted 'ae large enough to get the full impact of how it will look on the building. Chairman Stout stated that the project should be conditioned that plant material shall not be visible from the street. Planning Commission Minutes -8- March 26, 1986 Commissioner Rempel referred to the applicant's letter of request, and stated that the items listed from Jarivai4y to November should not be dis ^layed in the garden area. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Chitiea, to adopt the Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 86 -01 with an added condition requiring the rock veneer to be consistent with veneer used on the Conditional Use Permit 84 -31 and subject to the review and approval of the Design Review Committee. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I. REMPEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT NONE NONE - carried iT 86 -01 - CITY OF KANGHU GUGAMUNUA - A proposal to amend 1zction ti.uo.ulu -5ta) pertaining in T custou lot subdivisions, and 17.02.140 pertaining to definitions of the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ordinance 211. Bruce Cook, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Barker asked if the language of the proposed amendment would negate the authority of commission to make changes without recommendation of grading committee? Mr. Cook replied that the primary decision would be made by the Planning Cormi ssi on. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, advised that the intent was that the Grading Committee would report to the Planning Commission. To clarify the intent, he suggested striking that language and modify the condition to read: "additional grading may be allowed subject to the Planning Commission where the site constraints . . . . Commissioner Barker asked what would allow the flexibility for alternatives such as the use of deck area, as previously discussed. Mr. Cook replied that the intent is that structures are to be designed to fit the natural topography and allows flexibiity for alternative grading schemes at the discretion of the Planning Commission on a case -by -care basis. Commissioner Barker stated that elsewhere in the Code is a regulation which says there shall be 15 feet of usable yard space, he didn't see where that is addressed. He was concerned that this requirement in the Development Code might be in conflict with the proposed amendments to the sections. Planning Commission Minutes -9- March 26, 1986' Chairman Stout agreed it might be wise to add a statement to that section for clarification and reference for those types of situations where people who do not read,entire code. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There were no comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. The consensus of the Commission was that further refinement to the amendment was necessary to reflect the use of deeming material or some type of substitute to the solution of flat grading. Additionally, a statement is to be added to Section 17.11B.0404 pertaining to usable yard area, for clarification. The item was therefore removed from the agenda to allvd for proper advertisement and notification for the April 23, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. Old Business J. DESI(.N REVIEW FOR TPArT '12830 - CITATION BUILDERS A residential su—idi w� on cres to the ow Medium esi ential District (4 -8 du /aci into 103 lots located on the west side of Beryl Street north of Base Line Road - APN 202 - 751 -40. (Continued from February 26, 1986 meeting.) Bruce Cook, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Jerry Grant, Building Official, provided a cross section of the grading plan at scale and reviewed the site's grading. Chairman Stout asked for an explanation of how the Grading Committee examined the project and what changes, if any, were made from original proposal. Mr. Grant replied that this proposal is actually four feet less than the original proposal. He advised that alternatives had been explored such as dropping parts of the street or grading to the rear of the property, all of which created other problems. He advised from the Committee's standpoint, the grading plan presented contained the best of all features of grading practices and the Committee felt it was one of the best jobs that could be done under the conditions. Commissioner Rempel asked the grade of the slope from the back swale. Mr. rant replied that it was a 2% slope from the high to the low point at the low cu,rner of the lot. Chairman Stout invited public comment Jerry Linton, applicant, advised that he had met with the homeowners to the south to review existing grading conditions which he explained were the same if not better than the grading plans of the previous developer. He pointed out that the previous design reviex contained closer rear setbacks and had two ,core 2 -story houses. He felt his project had come a long way in considering the adjacent homeo�iners' concerns. Planning Commission Minutez -10- March 26, 1986 Geraldine Putnam, 9056 Lavine, Rancho Cucamonga, was concerned with the loss of view due to the height of lots to the rear of her lot. Ms. Putnam stated that she had not been given an indication of how the Commissioners felt about this issue. Martin Balding, 9016 Lavine, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that the developer did explain his position and he appreciated his concern and cooperation. He was concerned with the grading height of the homes to the rear of the existing tract. He suggested that the previous developer should have been required to work with the homeowners hernre the tract was reviewed by the Commission so that the concerns and issues could have been mitigated. There were no further comments. Commissioner Barker asked what authority the Planning Cummission has in responding to the concerns voiced. James Markman, City Attoney, ;advised that the tract map, which included street grade levels, was approvid under the Subdivision Map Act and if this project conforms with that approkai, the Commission is bound by that approval. Commissioner Barker stated that he felt frustrated and was not happy with the situation; however, the Commission was apparently powerless to do what they wished they could do. Commissioner Chitiea was sympathetic with the concerns raised by the , i.2owners; however, based on the City Attorney's direction, the Commission could not correct the grading situation at this point. Chairman Stout advised that !* Commission sits as administrative judges and everything is done in public. He explained that t%e reason the homeowners had not received input from the Commissioners is tha•, they do not comment on how they feel about a project prior to the public hearing. He advised that the Commission does not prejudge items before a meeting in which they take public testimony. Further, that the new developer has improved the design over what wai done before in that the site plan is better and there are less two story models. He advised that the Commission had done as much as it could to improve the project based on the authority they had to work with tonight. Commissioner Barker stated that a consideraole amount of time was spent on this issue at the previous meeting and he saw some of-the changes reflected in condition 2 dealing with lots 92 -97. He asked if it were safe to assume that each issue discussed for modification was included in new conditions. Mr. Cook replied that the Resolution was amendad per comments made at the previous meeting. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, advised that there was considerable discussion at the last meeting regarding treatment of lot "A" which was addressed in report but not made a condition other than what is shown on the plans. Commissioner Barker asked if the conditions reflect the area to be walled off to allow access to south. Planning Commission Minutes -il March 26, 1986 Chairman Stout replied that this was not a condition since staff advised that the County Flood Zontrol District will not allow this condition. Motion: Moved Rempel, seconded by Barker, to adopt the Resolution approving the Design Review for Tract 12830, Citation Builders. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried NEW BUSINESS K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -45 - AJA - The develoKi nt of two tuildings totaling 45,9uU square feet and THFee multi - tenant industrial buildings totaling 77,076 square feet on 7.09 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) and Haven Avenue Overlay District located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street - APN 209- 401 -01. Chairman Stout announced that an application for a 'onditiona'i Use Permit, which is required in conjunction with this project, had not been received as of this meeting. Staff recommended a continuance to April 9, 1986 in order for the Commission to review both items at one time. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to continue discussion of Environmental Assessment and Development Review 85 -45 to the April 9, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. L. PRELIMINARY REVIEW 015 -66 - WOOD - A consi %tency determination between the Foothill orr r Inter-i—m-MoTTcies and a commercial /office Master Plan concept located oa the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Turner Avenue. Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout invited public comment Donald Wood, 10040 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, gave overview of his request and asked for direction from the Planning Commission. Commissioner Barker stated that the Commission had recently reviewed another request by Equi's Restaurant which is located adjacent to this site. He reiterated the Commission's previous decision that this location is a problem and a feasible master plan is necessary for that area. He advised Mr. Wood that it would be necessary for him to gain cooperation and agreement on a master plan from the property owners adjacent to this piece of property.. Planning Commission Minutes -12- March 26, 1986 ,,�ar Chairman Stout stated that the City Council recently appointed a consultant to. prepare a plan for the development of Foothill Boulevard. He advised Mr: -Wooe that the ; ompletion of the plan would take approximately 18 months; therefor -, Interim Nolicics were developed for those applicants who did not feel .hey could wait until the completion of tN plan to develop. Additionally, the preliminary review process was establi,;hed to insure that applicants did not put a lot of time and honey into a prijject which may not be consistent with what the City envisioned for Foothill Boulevard. He agreed with Commissioner R Barker that the master plan proposed by the applicant does not meet the intent of the Foothill Boulevard Interim Polilcies and that a master plan would hacz to be developed which would be agreed to by the adjacent property owners. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Chitiea, unanimously carried, to determine Preliminary Review 85 -66, Wood, inconsistent with the Foothill e' Boulevard Interim Policies. PUBIC COMMENTS i Dan Richards, Stephen Daniels Associates, suggested that staff should explain i to people the City's position toward development on Foothill Boulevard until completion of the study. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, unanimously carried, to adjourn. 10 :10 p.m. Planning Commission adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Deputy Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -13- March 2'6, 1986 DE 11 Y I. BACKGROUND: The applicant Ladimer Alkhaseh, for Assad Development, is requesting a time extension for Tentai.!t; Tract 10216 as describtJ abov,?. The project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on June 9, 1982. A two-year time extension was then approved on June 13, 1984, extending the expiration date to June 13, 1986. The applicant's request for a 1 year extension would be the final extension perritted un:ier the State Map Act. II. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the project for consistency with the development criteria outlined in the City's Development Code. Based on this review, the project meets the basic residential development standards for the Very Low District, except for minimum ^�t average lot area. The Development Code requires the minimum ._' average lot area to be 22,500 square feet; the average lot area for this project is approximately 21,226 square feet. III. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Division recommends a final extensio�Z of one year be granted, thus making the final expiration date of this tract June 13, 1987. Respectfully submitLtd, _ 64�c�/ Brad Buller City Planner BB:JM:ns Attachments: Letter frc:n Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Staff Reports Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions Resolution of Approval ITEM A - CITY OF RANCHO CucAMONGA c�QnAAI STAFF REPORT �1p cg a 1 r 0 O y DATE: May 14, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: J(-hn R. Meyer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: FINAL TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10246 - ASSAD - A custom Tot subdivision of 10 acres of land into 5 lots located in the Very Low Density Residential Districc, (less than 2 du /ac), at the southwest corner of Haven and Hillside Avenues - APN 201 - 111 -14. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant Ladimer Alkhaseh, for Assad Development, is requesting a time extension for Tentai.!t; Tract 10216 as describtJ abov,?. The project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on June 9, 1982. A two-year time extension was then approved on June 13, 1984, extending the expiration date to June 13, 1986. The applicant's request for a 1 year extension would be the final extension perritted un:ier the State Map Act. II. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the project for consistency with the development criteria outlined in the City's Development Code. Based on this review, the project meets the basic residential development standards for the Very Low District, except for minimum ^�t average lot area. The Development Code requires the minimum ._' average lot area to be 22,500 square feet; the average lot area for this project is approximately 21,226 square feet. III. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Division recommends a final extensio�Z of one year be granted, thus making the final expiration date of this tract June 13, 1987. Respectfully submitLtd, _ 64�c�/ Brad Buller City Planner BB:JM:ns Attachments: Letter frc:n Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Staff Reports Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions Resolution of Approval ITEM A G ERSH FELD I ALKHASEH ENGINEERS STRUCTURAL DESIGN t April 4 1986 l C' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA {� f PLANNING DEPARTMENT z 1;. t .9320 Baseline Rd. ,' 1 'r. Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91701 + _ ► �� i r4 Re: TENTETIVE TRACK #10246 'y1� ". Gentlemen: Please find enclosed our check in the amount of $ 62.00 We would request a two -year extension of our conditional approval for .Tentative Tract No. 10246. If a two -yea;< extension is not available under City f t {, ordinances, we would request,the longest extension available Due to other proy+tcts of the owner and the market, 'we have not been able to proceed forwara on the Tentative,Tract to date. However, it appears 'to k�l +� %t,�,t'� us that we will be able to commence work to finalize the Tract Map in the.4p near future I t x r. . , <,p';•. ", � f ,. -.,�1 ^K^k. l -i A Vr, R..P4 1.44 1 , :? ;5.?• , k �1 .;Should "you have any if questions, please contact the undersigned at3� i �4714-983-2721). < x t• J', yp� "'' 1"t{x xi tt � ! ,rr ft�F� y t A tt�E,' ; 1{ �� ' �2. +f t��- FP r.Thank You: t �'•.�� P? iF j 'iµ;!1 t.-tf 7 �g: . +4Y jN�,� 1'+I fi 1 , f. �'Li ;y XYri+ 4Yt Hi ,i'n CJ 1t zCj 1 t�j}�i G ( " /5J �.� La zmer Alkhaseh is v 1, P E zV iyilEnC 1 T,•I. 1 , - .; }i.« { + J '! f..� {W t !Z� r iTrx L Pt.3�,,� R•'i {r�,,}2 .. ••K .. E t i ' i.i { th '�. s 1'^ro. I A r ttA t s €H i I ^E- t ,.,' , E;. x {,� iw�' � Y% f � } },� . )j)j �% tom) ♦ {�. E 't<= 6 « a . � i�t!i 4} �7', .. 4..+rxl 9 " W ;�{; � ;_er �."� �^ � Fj�'.� l t i4'�•��.t F� + � Y w4 ",� l y h •`,�>+. � _ t! N t ,., .7�` } } � ,.713} 'R {�F- `•�74.. - J 'Y i '11'7 � iii J�� t S'y�# +• .si[.:rt 7��,•,k,. . 'E].t.�`'�'S� ' 320 WEST G STREET,tSUIiE 104, ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA 94762 141983 -272 .. « ., cf ��.� �._ _ __ _ 111.50E _ - •- _ _ .. -.� POW ._ _ i. _ SiAEET PROJECT s _ SITE - C 16 V� NORTH MY OF ITEM En —i'T lC�2y n ... IZAI CHO CLGUNIONGA TITU PLANNING DIVISIQN E.,IjY13iT SGALE= z — r r . I Im i NORTH CITY OIL ItANCI'iOGD11 "IUN G% TITLG:_J� /1/�° PLANNING DIVISION ti PROJECT SITE _ Ott I NORTH CITY Y OF RANCHO IO Ct,7Cf-UNIONGA TITLE= r Pl..ri:ti:NING lDlVlSIC V EXHIBIT - SCALE: NORTH CITY or, I T EN 1: , RANCHO CUGkj NGA TITLE.- (n -9. PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT- p o i ems, E (f). The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. K LAt. . RESOLUTION NO. 82 -54 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING GOMMISZJION OF THE CIT'; OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALTFOk4IA, CONDITIONALLY APPnOUING TENTATIVE TRACT 11AP NO. 10246 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10246, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Luther Alkhaseh, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as the southwest co,ner of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue being ten (10) acres in size into 16, lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on June 9, 1482; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does rp,olve as follows: 1p S SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10246 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of de- velopment proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause ,- s substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; } ( (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health r b ems, E (f). The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. K LAt. . Resolution No. 87 -54 Page Z r (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map Na. 10246, a copy of which is attacFnd hereto,; is hereby approved subs /tt to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Co,tditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Lots 10 -15 shall have gated Equestrian access to the Community Trail along Haven Avenue. 2, The corner lot radius or, lot 15 shall be 24'. 3. The racorded feeder trail easements are to include 15' corner cut -offs at all intersections of trails. 4. The street trees along Haven Avenue are to be p'tanted in the 6' wide par"way between the Community Trail and the curb line, 5. The rec€,aed CC &R's ~for the tract should include a prrvision to require that any walls to be constructed along Haven are to be of uniform design and materials. 6. The rear lc, lines of lots 10 -15 shall be planted with evergreen trees, and properly irrigated in conjunction with the construction of the Community Trail. The trees shall be a minimum of 5- gallon in size, Larger trees may be required, depending on spacing. The detailed landscaping plans for the tract shall include . this rear yard area and shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to the approvad.and recordaty -)n of the final map, ENGINEERING DIVISION 7. That p)rtion of the block wall, along the north boundary of Tract 9430, existing in Vesada Street is to be removed. 8. installation of a stormdrain system to incept and drain all runoff from the tract to Naven Avenue shall be required. The location and design of t-ie system shall be approved by the City Engineer, prior to recordation of the map. 'K Resolution No. 8? 54 Page 3 BUILDING AND SAFETY DiVISiON 9. Modification of the drainage structures and locations will be required in order to provide the following (a) Equestrian trail structures located on the up -hill side of the easements. (b) Provisions to transfer water from the up- hill side to the downhill side where necessary, (c) Provision for an energy dissipator at the vicinity of the southwest corner of the property. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TF DAY OF JUNE, 1982. "=.ANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •1 BY: Jeff a tnig� a an ATTEST- -._ Secretary of the P1'annil' -Commi -ssion I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of June, 1982, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES': COMMISS';;NERS: Tolstoy, Stout, Rempel NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS King iti .• €t . _ _.,,��y _ _ _., �. .fig ill li �Y y' .n Zzo r O r � Pr ^ j -�•C 61 ' n • N •O•'6 O �j � ^ • ` � 4 7 .ter• ' '� a �, � O A J. i O O � :• C C n • 4 4 N N C 1-01 O P P > o o� v >. e en„ a Cr0•� ; ^�!• C C r n r � r• �.'� � � r 1 1 ;' . CYq p O�' 9 p r SCn S SRO.^ M May - S Senn <~ ; ;d 30 o -0< S o . • � O ^^ � �`• c r r �o S n n v •c � �Yn < < Nv � � w w • �• Mn Y n`°'-'`o �' ° a a z. v Yu3 n v u u S S j j •% n 3 n n 6 r 9 y y� 6 P P !• N N N Q Q rD Z.O n n~ O Ou �•? C C^O w = 94,yp O� O O 1. r11 T •N N Ii N N F aY. rowwN Y Y r ° � O O O �. 6 °S .w S N O inc.n w G 0 l� y Y Y. n Q � s„°• o 6 7 Ya O••C = � 0 • r o m o ^ ^� ° as n 6 m ^ x x >m up. � � F n c cn ..,n 5.0 9 o C Cdr n n0 ^q° ' '6 +per n n•� . O �� � .�. 3 0t� � �r�Si -� r `.r�M O ax NQ 5. p p 1 3 J - bG. k k ' V3 N S� n _ _ N a' J J1 3 6 O On °`g�° • •cPj1 `^n Y Y S ^P O O Oo.:.. _ _ 1 1. Lr i 2 p0 A O 1 -• 6 6 N N ` S NY n S O � � O. �'. IR 2 2-2 u� c c ° w �.�_:» " n ° a n= vt E.� - I, n w N �u ou noF3 �6 +• < ..'.. �wr w �^ bq G33 n or- do01 3_n - `a _. � d qN tiC�V 4btu�> ar 1 1W _ p�.9'.36 rp b = nNa O O�if n = >O^ti r. C� O� wpp ��u c�.Y O:.•. .O..r�.�'!T_ •C� _ .tom r 7 Utl = o ° u s. � p, •w. a a N o ^Cf+ N a- a � p. � .°a p N '. a = =� �oNi�n O�r R. CO. • >t °�v ° O _�_ trio �•Cn , -Ign•c n,- pN ° OG S u2 n orj — rGw q^ r 6JV •• � t O.. gyp. C, E Crr 1- CtlaO nrt .n 3d °O OZ tea. N � r a ! a 6`- •t•nSO v n N b � N ~ v •° bA Via` C n ° .. �C).�n� �` 'ail �.^ • < q � C O 3 ^ ONr u 6 � iD r_+. r R?• a C_ry p� >c 39 l ... a ' n3 et 00 w 1� 6 .- •1 o �a NY u .oru n N. O = °per W = °c o Sffb0 r C� ~3 <? '� • N rS ig 21 R ^ >aa.a �aS q Ir'O P.n V � Ow IO O ° SN 52; c n� no p!z -� J a c i t9 Ad, t a , ag I i I I i n' �. 4 • • 300 5 5 q•?5 D. En L'I IX Ix Ix to � - V N • IN S11 CC! N w� er dr N O A w � O � � o N r o N n J° H � Or n a� O'er G9 :i tV • G W 00° � t NO _ c 'c °• �'e 'o o n y ^-r al � ,,, oa• N° a o0 t ^ c ni a Sj _..7+0 'a^7v to _ w 6. Y. £ O ] ��_. C� � 1AwS ia• �.0 +J nit' V ° > � 4 N =.NT C �• 'o �Y Nw ~ n°i n � n 6 ^.o •n n^ ^= t,� 4 Jam NW,Ow n Ynn 1r +4 r `7 Y t a2 27 �.n Not°�a ,. dz NI + o e En L'I IX Ix Ix to � - V N • IN S11 CC! N w� er dr N O A w � O � � o N r o N n J° H � Or n a� O'er 24 _ O � nT '�r n n3 v' c� 3Q ^°v O n t"1\ V o �n a° � 74 4 n 0 0 G9 :i tV • G W 00° � t NO _ c 'c °• �'e 'o o n y ^-r al a. - r Y N ° ^ c O t G pp^o 'a^7v to _ w 6. Y. £ MJ 1AwS ^O nit' V ° > & sn O•r jS `s �Y Nw ~ ^.o Si .. � 5' a . 24 _ O � nT '�r n n3 v' c� 3Q ^°v O n t"1\ V o �n a° � 74 4 n 0 0 R -1;). IN �1° 1t- G9 :i tV • G W 00° � t NO _ c 'c °• �'e 'o o n y ^-r al a. - r Y N ° ua pp^o 'a^7v to _ w 6. Y. 1AwS ^O nit' V ° > & sn O•r jS 90= �Y Nw ~ ^.o Si .. � 5' a . -j7 `7 Y t a2 27 �.n Not°�a ,. dz NI i � e' ° e = c a 3 n R -1;). IN �1° 1t- G9 :i tV • G 00° n n z £ A n O 1 NO _ c 'c °• �'e 'o o n y ^-r al A N d� r Y N ° ua pp^o 'a^7v to _ w 6. Y. 1AwS ^O nit' V Pg!zz > & sn O•r jS 90= o Nw ~ ^.o G o_s. -j7 `7 Y t a2 ' i � e' ° A o R -1;). IN �1° 1t- G9 :i tV • G n n z £ A n O 1 NO _ c 'c °• �'e 'o o n y al A V t w r Y N ° to _ w 6. Y. n qua a N�a °Q nT3 .aka = V 3. r OAS M4 .70w hry m OSS n�` Oer.�� ° �Y �y 'i � ?ACN � =1++��1N nu 1�' 5 » h �c @ N �Y b �A C A q.•,a Ell .� � p O �Y x J c qy C �' s99 yl 4 �qr Lte �' a. wY tO M ° ... � n G C v w- • � 3, C 3aa0 A 390 IIO 4 =s a c ... 1 ••y. „+o o. 1 6 L • # # f fp A 4 4 N N 2. A 5p �O < ' y A A A � a A AO qa f f f f ' y0^3 3 3 t 7 A O O O } } G G1 _ y y .�'w- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10246 - ASSAD UHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above - described project pursuant to Section 1.501.82(b); and, WHEREAS, the 'Planning Commission conditionally approved the above described Tentative Tract. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings; A. The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial compliance with the Zity's current General Plan Specific: Plans, Ordinances, Plans, k Codes and Policies; and, B. The extension of the Tentative Map will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current Gtigral Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies; and, C. The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and, D. The extension is within thp. time limits prescribed by state law and local ord nance. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Tract _ licant Lxpiration "VL46 Assad June 13, 1987 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary P, -� Resolution No. TT 10246 - Assad May 14, 1986 Page 2 I, Brad Buller,_ Deputy Secretary of the Plannir, Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamon,Ia,'do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly inty',oduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, dt a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of June, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ,:DES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: R 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT jO CVCAMplc9.. < i in O O F DATE: May 14, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: BarrMa Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION PARCEL MAP 3383 - BANKS located north of Base-Line Road,,-jest of'East Avenue - APN 227- 131 -29 T_ntative Parcel Map 3383 was initially approved by the Planning Commission on January 26, 3983 for an initial two year period until January 213, 1985. 1The first of a possible three one -year time extensions was granted on January 9, 1985 extending this approval period until January 26, 1986. The moratorium esta5lished for the completion of the Etiwanda Area Master Plan of Drainage automatically extended the approval period for 133 days lan,il June 8, 1,986. The applicant is now regii. ing the second of the possible three one - year extensions which wou; - extend the approval period until June 8, 1987. His letter of request is attached along with the previous staff reports a^ -l- quirions of approval,;foe your reference. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adoPt the attached resolution approving a one -year extension of time for Parcel Map 3383. The new expiration iate is.to be January 26, 1987. Respectfully submitted, Barrye Hanson Senior Civil Engineer ++ I SH :BK:ns I V. / OF RANCHO ENGINEERING DIVISION 'VICINITY MAP title; AP A —CE L' N page el * ^| ' rENTAT/VE SURVEYOR ;RCEL MAP 1VC1 X8,3 OWNER j15 FlL D. FRANCS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO Cuc AMONGA ✓AMEs BANKS ✓R 43/5 DIEGO, A. 921 ST. 13181 V/CTOR /A SAN D /EGO, CA. 92//5 MARCH, 1980 E7/WANDA, CA. 91739 (714) 981-0471 SOUTHERN PACIFIC R.R. TRACKS lVB9°5630'E NORTH LINE OFLOT /O /695.78333.03`__ i � 333 cp 3 rY/RE FENCE U,;. IRS-- 1 STORAGE_ N R=50' BLDG O p d= /26 °52 /2 „ 26 °El C ,� 0 L= //0.72' 22EU . l R 50 Ln AC. 4� tm I � —•_. W 303.//' Q y� 0+SHE0 I-- ---OFFER OF DEG/CAT /SNiAC. SHEDS 3 � W N8914815E 303./4 O a- � JQ N89048%5 1E 303./7' 30' —iJ a =20 s1,os I d= 90°/1'00" = RES /DENCE 0 L= 31.48' / `g •T= 20.06' 0.7. AC. o N89048i51F 28313' EvC. ROW 04815 E 333.20"' _ SOU7HL /NE ar-LOT /O OFFER OF LKD AT/nN GENERAL /MFO,RMAT /ON VT /LIT /ES: GAS WATER, TELEpHONEAND ELECTR/C /TY NOW SERVE THE RECENTLY CONST aE0 AS N /M6 SA' LY TO 1 HE WEST AND Cl g BE EXTENDED TO ERVE TH /S PROPERTY AS NECESSARK SEWAGE DISPOSAL 70 BE• &Y CESSPOOL AND SEPT /C TANK. TREES: SEVERAL LARGE EUL:4LY T!/S TREES ARE ON PROPOSED PARCEL 4 AND ROWS OF MEDIUM TO LARGE EUC A/W ALaVG THE NORTH AND SOUTH BCRDERSOF ME FlPJITY. t AINAu^E: DRAINAGE SLOoE IS APPROX. 2l ALMOST DUE SOUTH /N D /AECT/ON W ITH THE RA ILROAD ON THE NORTH STGPP /NC• Wg ITtE/ fLOYY/NG SOUTH FILM ENTER /NS THE PROPERTY. NUPOSED LAND USE•' EVENTUAL CONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE FAMILY TESIDE' -'S BUIL•OIVQ SET- BACKS 70 BE A M/NlMUM OF 25 'FROM THE F.170SE0 EAST STREET DED/G4ACbY LINE[ VIC/MYY MAP NO SCALE L N — N m Z 4V ` •�on�j�oe��oo I �s 04 'Ay (AT •�,� I r , ^z ^ Z O U z z O J F cZ C, \LIFORNIA 'G? Cl� ti� 1 ;bp a itM3 dO�S AtiORNEiS :Ai 1,:,.V �. �.) 'S- RFET, ;UIiE IKB JAMES ©ANHS ..R -. 00z: =—IcE Box +73 THOMAS .a RIZ'cH1E 'JRLAND. CALIFORNIA 9178S X71 a! •aa1 -0931 I April 8, 1986 Community Development Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road �1 Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Califo,Inia 91730 Re: Tentative Parcel Map 3383 Gentlemen and Ladies'; Tentative Parcel Map 3383 expires 8— June - 1986. I have been unable to progress on the map because ,af a transaction which failed in escrow. I request a one yea-., extension of the right to record the map. My check for $62.00 to cover your fees is enclosed, Thank you, rncere�Yp-; -� awes Ba s, Jr. cc: Mary Lane 1 Enclosure: Chick I rJn— 5 t CITY CF RANCHO CUC �.�ONGA ,CA,%f y STAFF REPORT {� °���^ U > 1977 I DATE: January 9 1985 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: REQUEST FOf TIME EXTENSION - PARCEL MAP 3383 BANKS - Located an the north side of Base Line Road, west of East Avenue_ Parcel Map 3383 was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on January 26, 1983 for the division of 5 acres of land into 4 parcels within the Low - Medium Residential District located on the north side of Base Line Road, west of East Avenue. This tentative approval is valid for a period of two -, years and with appropriate extensions, an additional two years time may be, geanted. Mr. Banks is irequesting an extension of time to comr'ete the final map and street improvement plans. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended thait the Commission adopt the attached resolution approving a one -year extension of time for Parcel Map 3383.. The new expiration date will be January 26, 1986 . espe tfully submit ed, LBH: .iaa Attachment I "7 n IV j, 1 MjLmks ATTORNEYS. AT LAW 4'� s 99 -C" r'TREET. SUITE IOe JAMES 8AN%S,JR' 1 P03T OFFICE 80% 278 THOMAS B. RITCHIE - UPLAND, CALIFORNfA 91786 17141 981 -0931 16 October 1984 Engineering and Planning,D.epartments. City of Rancho Cucamonga 9161 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Parcel Map 3383 Gentlemen and Ladies: want to apply for an extension of time within which to make the improvement required in the approval of m;r Parcel Map. incere "rte,` JAMES BANK ` JBJ:prm �z $ AA 1 a j DATE: TO: FROM: BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUC.0 MONGA STAFF REPORT January 26, 1983 Planning Commission Lloyd B. Nubbs, City Engineer Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENT 1 3383 - BANKS TFe division of a acres of land into lots wit in the R -1 zoiae located approximately 660' west of East Avenue APN 227- 1HI -29 (continued. from Planning Commission meeting 3f November 10, 1982) CVCANtp, f S f1 C ~� z 1977 i PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The above described parcel map is being re- su�m=itte y r. ames Ban s, to divided five acres of land into 4 lots, the smallest being .71 acre. Approval was previously given by the City Engineer on May 12, 1980, This approval expired on November 12, 1981, This site is presently undeveloped. To the west is an existing residence; to the north and east is vacant land and to the south is an existing nursery. ThE land is zone R -1 with a General Plan designation of 2 -4 dweiting units per acre. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan shows the area as tow- medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre,). The same plan places the site outside of an equestrian area, but a community trail is proposed along the Southern Pacific Railroad. PREVIOUS PROJECT: The subdivision proposed lies considerably removed from the nearest pu is street. When this is the case, Planning Commission policy requires that a dedicated and partially improved public street be provided between the property and an existing public street (see attached resolution). The parcel map covering this property was originally approved in 1980, under the discretion given the City Engineer, due to the requirement placed on that map to improve a drainage course to Base Line, It was felt that the improvei-iients ncessary for the drainage would also have provided an acceptable access until further development in the area provided a more suitable street pattern. A Negative Declaration was granted in April 1980. At that time, the Interim General Plan designation was "Windrow Residential ", 0,1 to 3 units per -cre, P.NALYSIS: The Commission is now considering resubmission c° this map under a proposed Specific Plan which has designated the area with a land use of Low - Medic.m (4 -8 units per acre) and which has further developed its future circulation needs. The attached vicinity map shows a backbone street pattern which best addresses the constraints existing in the area but it is not intended as a "master plan ". _ t ITEM B if Planning Commission r Ff Report ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS*NT AND PARCEL MAP 3383 January 26, 1983 Page 2 The proposed subdivision conflicts with the pending Specific Pls• in two respects: First, the designated land ue is entirely different; secondly, the existing access and drainage paths do nc.•" coincide with, the best locations for a future street. Physically and env`ronmentally, the proposal r,ould be acceptable with an access as provided in the recommended conditions of approval. Such an access would be temporary, however, and would be vacated in the future whEn a street system in the proper location becomes available. With respect to planning, the - proposal should be carefully considered because the conflict with the Specific Plan land use is significant, but the recent subc,vison to the west is a duplicate of the one being proposed and provides a bala,.-ed neighborhood centered on the cui- de -<suc street. The possibility remains, however, that any of the existing or proposed lots could be further subdivided on an individual basis with no opportunity for master planning. It appears that this potential problem is limited to the 10 acres accessed by the cul -de -sac. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your •review and consideration is Part I oi° the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Fart II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent t6` surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site r has also been completed. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Commission consider the information given in the foregoing report together with public input during this and previous hearings and take one of the following actions: 1. Approve the tentative map as submitted, which calls for a 40' public road dedication to Base Line, understanding that the road would have to be superseded in the future. l.a. Same, with a 301offer of dedication. 2. Approve the tentative map with the condition that only a private, -d access easement to the property will be sufficient until the f6, streets are available. 3. Deny the map if conflict with the pending Specific Plan is found to be unmitigated by the neighboring similar subdivision Resp tfully submi ted, i LB :jai Attachments: Map °- City Engineer's Report w, Initial Study Resolution JA70 � RESOLUTION NO. 79 -07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCH('- CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING SUBDIVISION ACCESS 1MPROV. 'AENT POLICY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to discourage the proliferation of private unimproved streets; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish firm policy guideline to inform property owners of the City 3OW, THEREFORE, BE IS RESOLVED XND ESTABLISHED, that as a condition of approval of any-Parcel Map, s?arcel hap- Waiver, Tract Map or Lot Line Adjustment rn applicant sha;4 have acceas to a fully dedicated and maintained City street. Wh6te dedications and improvements do not 'exist, the applicant shall obtain a minimum of forty (40) feet of dedication and improve with twenty -six (26) " -t of pavement needed street frontage to reach the nearest maintained City street._ Variations from this policy will require approval of the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga subject to appeals to the Planning Commission. APPROVED ANA .ADOPTED THIS 24Th DAY of JANUARY, 1979. PLANNING COMMISSION Or THE C-',,Ty OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: -f ,,� // vlierman Rempel, Ghairmari I ATTES Secretary of the Planning Commission I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City ofi-qancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoingResoluti,on was duly and re arly in«oduced, passed, arA adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of January, 1979, by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GARCIA, TOLSTOY, JONES, REMPEL (' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL `06 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON1GA CITY Ef1GINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: James Banks,Jr. LOCATION: North of Base Lime, between East and Etiiwanda Avenues LEGAL DESCRIP11ON: Portion of Lot 10, Blk "K" of Etiwanda Colony Lands W] TENTATIVE MAP NO.PM 3383 DATE FILED: resubmitted 8/82 NUMBER OF LOTS: 4 RECEIPT NUMBER: FEE: $230.00 ZONE: g-1 F * * * * * * * k * * * * * * * Yr * * * * * * * * * k * * * * * * * •`. �k * * * * it * * * TENTATIVE MAP PRLPARED BY: Jnhnson & Moslev GROSS ACREAGE: 4 acres ADDRESS: 1033 E. Rosemead Ct. MINIMUM LOT AREA:- 0.71 acre Ontario, CA 91764 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 102 ft. RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE g James Banks, Jr. 13181 Victoria. Rancho Cucamonga 91739 981 -0931 � REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications 1. Dedication by "final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: any additional feet on Pecan Avenue 3n, _ additi(=xl( feet on ak street _ . A410910MAJ feet on - -_-- _- ` 4; l§ ithA�;' RX4SX�F�11 l�dKx1F���3(iF&8X8ii�'�. Other 3. Rights of cular access shall be limited as fol -lows: 4. Street ca ,on required or: 5. Master Plan, f Streets revision required or: 6. The follow d perimeter intersections require realignr,.ent as foriows: 'RCE 1�' TENTATIVE MAP NO. 3383 Page 2 is Improvements (Bonding is required prior to ® Recording for Pecan Ave and* ) * Private Ease^.mi IT, Building peyoiZ for a tree ) 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all X interior streets. 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: STREET NAME CURQ GUTTER A.C. PVMT. . .7u... SIDE- <DRIVE WALK 'APPR. V... V Jllc4al STREET TREES STREET LIGHTS MEDIAN ISLAND � OTHER X X X at time X Oak St. X X r X r X ' Bement X i X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. _X_ 10. Provide all utility serf ces tc Pars, lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, te; -.rnone and ca ')le television-conduit. All utilities are to be underground. x_11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the•relccation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. _x _ 12. I-etall appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. x_ 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage an-i street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Erdineer. _X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall M designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptan9V is required. x 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underground service. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services Twill require an A.C. overl-;r• 17. The o owing specific dimensions, i.e., cu -de -lac radius, street section widths) are not approved: 18. The following existing streets are substandard: They will require• Approvals and Fees ( 19. This subdivision shall b� auject to conditions of approval from CALTV'AiVS/ )San Bernardino County F jod Control District. X 20. 'Approvals have not been secu.,ed from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. RCE 20 ig l3 .. 1 TEi1TnTI.E :`..4P `t0'. IM v 21. Pernits from other agencies �•rili be required as follows: A. Cal`crans, for; B. City: X C. County Dust Abatement District; D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenchR_ are ov� r 5T ip: Y E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other: Ma:) Control Page 3 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro vile for two•,1ay traffic and parking on all affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map:� 24. All corner lots shall ha e a corner radius at � tht '�ight -of -way ine in accord- ance with the City rf Ra. ,ho Cucamonga standards= 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26. The bL o—' undary.p the Tentative rJap nr ", -, s clarification as follows—. 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanat,on required. Parcel iA Waiver. 28. information subm?tted at the time of application is / is not sufficient :o support the issuance of a waiuer of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act-end local ordin -roes. "�Y�iQX�i4K X (Bonding is required prior to M:Recording for Drainage DRAINAGE )4liR�iRIS�i o u1 —) 24. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood In-�srance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of the, program ari Ordinance No. 24. 36. 31. t 32. 33. X 34. ' RCE 20 A drainage «hannel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. .:h flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. If eater surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. Culverts required to be Constructed across streets at following locations:_ Broad scale hydrologlc studies tyl e'requ rr`e o assess impac o increased fns ?af i apkroved drainage facilities to drain site to Base Line and elimina existing flooding ,ituation of Baseline Road. TENTATIVE MAP NO. 3383 page 4 AWk Miscellaneous X 35. Cust abatement will be made a condition of issuanre of the grading permit for this project. 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with file Planning Division report on subject property __37. This property is not �eUhin the present City Boundary ana will require annexation. 38. All information required to be bhow; on the tentative map is not shown as re- :. quired: X 34. Proper grading and erosion control, iociuding the p :even ation of .cdimenta- tion or damage to nffsite property shall be provided for as required. 40. A preliminary soii�:,�;eport will riot be required for thi< site for thr follow- ing F ing reasons: A copy of the 'Zoils repot furnisher] to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engireer:ng Division. X 41. The filing of the tentat wi ma- or approval c� same does not guarantee that sewer treatmp,,c capacity will be?,available at the time building pfrmits are requested. When building perm;ts are requestrd, the Cucamonga County Water t District will be asked t; certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless Said certification is r.tceived it writing. X 42, The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 6i436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Ict, that division and development of the , r-.,perty will rot unreasonably int Mere with the free and complete exercise r of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement .,Id the signa- ture of any such nublic entity or public utility may be omitted from the Final map unless the City is notified in writing of any objectidn to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of Grid Section. X 43. At the time cf Final iiap submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse r calculations (jheets), copies ijf recorded maps and deeds used as 1.eference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and'oench marks refsaidnced. 44. Development, shalt be limited to one drive approach per street. %iltiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches ai tit lines. 45. Local and master planned equestrian trail, shall be provided is accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan, A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum siop_s,.physical conditions, fencing and weed contrrl in accordance with the Cit, Equestrian Trail Standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recorda'cion of the final map. . X 46. Access easerr6nt to the property shall include city forces for the purpose d maintaining public portions of Oak ar•1 Pecan Streets. CITY OF RP ";,Ho CUCAMONG.A LLQ 0 B. HUBBS +'r CITY ENGINEER ' c By RCE 20 rn , c, 4`. i t l - RESOL'6T''Xl NO. 33 -09 A RESOLUTION ,1F THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL '4AP NUMBER 3383 (TEilTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 3383), LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC PAILROAD, WEST OF EAST AVENUE -± WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map dumber 3383, submitted by James Banks, Jr. and consisting of 4 parcels, located at the souti, side of Southarn Pacific ''air road, west of East Avenue, being a division of a porticn �:f Lot 10, Block 110 of the preliminary map of the Etivanda Colony Lands per map recorded in Book 2, page 24 of Maps of the County of San 3ernsr--ino, State of California; and NHEREAS, on June i', 1982, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above- described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on January 26, 1983, the Planning Commission held a duly I advertised public hearing for the above- described map. I NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCK3 CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION ,4VED AS FOLLOWS: IMF SECTION 1: Thct ,:; a following findings have been made: 1. Tnat the map is 1consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consisterc with the General Plan. " 3. That the site is P:,.' si-'�lly Z- .1table for the proWised development. I 4. Thai the proposeda subdivision and improvements w #11 f not cause substan,ial environmental damage, pudic health pxooblems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this arcject will not create significant adverse Environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on January 26, 1983.E SECTION 3: Thai `" cc! ,rap No. 3383 is approved sub -0ct to the c— ditions of the Citg't; -ct pertaining thereto, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ih, , JANUARY, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO-_LVCAMONGA _ k . ; RPsglutiC: -.No• Pages 2, 33 -04 i i BY: Jeff ay n ai n - , •Secretary t e latining.Comgission I, JA;K LAM, Secretary of the Planning Comeaission of the City of Rancho Cucat.pbga, do hereb;, certify that the foregoing Resolution regul-,,rly introduced, passed, City of Rancho Cucamong., at was duiy and and adopted by the Planning Commission of the a regular meeting ca the 26th of the Planning Com.:�ission �)eld day of Janu>ry, 1383, by thA following vote -to -.wit: AYES: COidMISSTJNtr..'- MCNISL, BARKER, REMPEL, STOUT, PING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - VIP i rr t f n- I r• t i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY - "ART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET- To be completed by applica,it Envirowrintal Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Conntittee through the department where the project application i:made. Upon receipt -of this application, the Environmental Apalysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take zction °no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three de "erminations: 1) Tha project will have no significant environmental impact-and a.Nie4ative DeclaraV on will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and aro Environmental Impact Report Vill be prepared, or 3) An additional. information report should be supplied by the applicant: ;gi.viag further information concerning the proposed.project, I' I PROJECT TITLE: South Eippard Ranch _ APPLICANT'S M-W, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Tames Banks. Jr 13181 Victoria, Etiwanda. Ca. 91739 (714)899 -127 BUT NOTE:- mailing add: 'r. 0; Box 278, Upland, Ca. 91786 NAAE, hDDRESS- TELEPHONE OF PEPSON TO BE CONTACTED WIXERNING THIS PROJECT: Janea.Banks. Jr_ . gnat• of -r;-o m-- LOCATION OF PROJECT {ST''EET ADDRFSS Tax Code A::ea 7011 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUINF SUCH PERMITS: No. Such other permits as may be _ec ired_haye been obtained and one on file witn City. I -1 �j —� E j PROJECT DESCrlIPTION-. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT_ Lot -split of one fives -acre parcel into tIaree one -acze lots and one two- acreijlot. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISSTING AND PROPOSED BUILDING, IF Yv l ill ultimately F v DESCRIB;c THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMNTION ON TOPOGRAPHY,, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECFSSAnv CL7mvzI .. _ Is Ws project, part of a larger pr -ject, one of a series of cumulative actions, Which although individucilly small may as a whole have si nifica t - g n envkronmental impact? mm- mh'. nr ,- .,-- - '�t split with a view instruction of four h��uses. In W!LL THIS PROJECT; YES- M X 1. Create a substantial change in ground' contours? X 2. CrT,te a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demanc for municipal.services (police, fire, water, sswage, etc.)? Increase by four houses. _ X 4. Creatr changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5. Rsmove any existing trees ? - How many ? None, unless required by the City for road purposes. _ - X- 6. Create the need Tor use or disposal of potentially ha4ar4i3us materials sutih as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Exp?anatia r of any YES answers above: ?'here are no es" answers above. IMPORTAta ' If the pro3act involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION:: I hereby ,ertify that the statements furnished above ' and in the attached exhibits present the data and Wormation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements;, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that addTtionai information may be mquired to be e ;ubmitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development _ Review Committee, Date 5 July 1982 Signatur R Title Owner i a g I -3 f -; RESIDENTIAL CONSTUCTION The following informa {;ion fhould be provided tr, the City of Rancho racamonga Planning Division in ok-le 'to aid in assessinc, the ability of'the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. ` Name of Developer and Tentative Tract NO.:' James Banks Jr. Specific Location of Project:' N. of Baseline, lq. of East Ave'llue There are no current building plans. PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1.. Number of single family units: one One _ One one Four 2. Number of multiple family units: None None None_ None - None 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 1984 1985 1986 1987 N /p, 4.' Surliest date of occupancy,. _ 1985 1986 1987 1988 N /p, Model and n of Tentative S. Bedrooms price Range 3 -5 140000 150,000 16Ci p0 1'70,0'00 r T -4.. ''s 4.1 i ri -o RESOLUTION NC. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMiSSiOta, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 33.83 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension above- described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2 of Ordinance for the 28 -B, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above- describel tentative parcel map on January 26, 1983. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has following findings: made the A. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time. B. That Strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. C. That there has been no significant changes to t, character of the area in which the project is located. that would cause the project to become conforming or inconsistent with current standards. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissiot hereby time extension for: grants a Parcel Map Applicant Expiration 3383 ,Oames Banks June 8, 1987 APPROVED AND .QGPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTESTz Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary -1 Resolution No. Parcel Map 3383' May 14, 1986> Page 2 I Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing RE.solution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning C,immission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, t a regular meeting of the Planning Commission herd on the 14th day of May, 1:»6 by the following-vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONER`. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i I kq ysgp n U, .� CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 14, 1986 —' TV: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission ' FROM �adDuller City Planner BY; JGhn R. Mikyer, Assistant Pianner ` SUBJECT: ' revier of footprints iin—d,,Rlevatio s for an approved tentative tract of 19 residential lot subdivision 6n 9.75 acres of land in the Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner or n,//sioe and Beryl - ^pm 10*1-621-01~ I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Approval of elevations and p~:ot plan. B. 1.95 dwelling units per acre. ^^ -^ Surrounding Land U�:e and Zoning: , North - Existing single family development, Very Low . Residential South - Avacado grove, Very Low Residential sas4;, - Existing single family devn-lo9ment° Very Low Residential Heyt - Heritage Park~ Open Space D. - ,"we^^ "" "='r ^"° D=' �^"^ North - Very Low Density al South - Very Low Density Residential V..i- �� - � �~ � � ^ �. ..��. ~~. n �.. � " �� �� I West - Open Space ' ' .� E. 9.75 acre parcel formerly usecl-as a vineyard. The site slopes unifomly from norlth to south at approxit-ately an 8% grade. ' .. ITU1 C PLANNING Caw ssm STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract lIP97 - Nordic May 14, 1936 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS A. General: This tract vas ;.originally approved on Ortober 26, 198.3, a subdivision only. The new developers a,e now requesting approval of elevations and 'plot plans for the 19 single - family lots. Proposed elevations consist of 3 floor plans r *nging in size from 1,815 to 2,660 sq. ft. Fhe largest floor pls;, has three elevations;''the other two floor plans,:bave two elevations. This project is consistent with the conditions set forth in the crigin.21 Resolution of Approval which include: the use of hammer'nead and circular type driveways along Beryl, side and front entry garages, variable setbacks, and variot►s architectural treatments. B. Design Revit.4 Committee: The Design 'Review Commmittee discussion focused on four issues: 1) the mix of floor plans throughout the tract, 2) the use of bay window on Plan 1850 -6, 3) the massive roof element on Plan 2650 -A and 8, and 4) providing upgradad treatment to corner side elevations f,`cing Hillside Road. The Committee consensus was to achieve a b'4tter and more balanced distribution of unit mix throughout the project by adding a Plan 2200 along Beryl, and a second Plan 1850, on Eastwood. The applicant agreed to use a bay window on Plan 1850 -8. The applicant has provided revised ele ations for 2650 -A and B which break up the roof mass. The Committee requested that on 2650 -A, a cap be placed on the balcony and wrapped around the side elevations which is i„cluded in the revises, elevation (Exhibit "D"). The applicant was also directe6 to upgrade with veneer on the chimney on Plan 2200. The Committee then recommended the project be placed on the next available Planning Commission agenda. The Conceptual Grading Plan was submitted showing a 6 foot high block wall along the Hillside Road Equestrian Trail. The Design Review. Committee did not disca�ls the issue of whethe- this wall was required, or preferred, at its April 17, 1986, .meeting. However, since then, the applicant has ccpressed his concern and discussed with the staff the need for said wall and has submitted a letter on May i, 1986, requesting ::hat the wall not be required as a condition of this design review. The intznt of the Community Trail Design Standard for the perimeter wall was to provide a consistent streetscape appearance within the equestrian /rural area. Although other 06 a 4' w �9, I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 1 Tentative Tract 11997 - Nordic May 14, 1966 Pv�'e 3 types of fencing c)uld have been chusen, such as extruded concrete fencing, the solid decorative wall will avoid the situation where each homeowner builds their own privacy wall /fence, that � n create a "hodgepodge" appearance. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that the wall is required along Hillside and is nut ;optional. Flexibiiity of masonary materials is ails, -ed to provide for product identity. A. combination of decorative block, '>lumpstone, river -rack, and plaster /stucco finish car. be used. effectively to provide a streetscape that compliments the architectural style of the project. The south and east property boundartes will be de Sloped with local feeder trails and split rain fencing. A second issue not discussed by the Design Review Committee, but with the applicant, has been the perimeter streetscape treatment along Beryl Avenue. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider requiring the installation of consistent return walls /fences along Beryl Avenue between houses to provide a uniform appearance. If the Commission concurs, an additiona' Condition of Approval, reflecting, th., inclusion of return mills/ fences should be included in the Resolution as follows. f Return walls /fences be installed ;ratween houses along Beryl. The des qn and layout oV the walls /fences shall be revs" ad and approVLd by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. III. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider all terial and input regarding this project. If the Commission concurs with the Design Review . tommittee`s recommendations, approval of the elevations and piat plans through the aloption of the attached Resolution wcald be apprn „ariate. Respectfully submittce, Brc•i Buller City Planner LB:dM:ns Attachmants: Exhibit "A” - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan and Grading Plan Exhibit "C" Conceptual. Landscape Plar Exhibit "D" - Elevations Letter from Project Engineer Original Resolution of Approval with Conditions Y Em 12 NORTH PLA7t►v}1�y��c1p�Y/�� ■T'IV SONTx1���]'�Bim i! arf�rrti�� I .............. .. . . . ....... 0701-02 P.C,,,_Agenda Packet o Pa2e of 8 l� i E [ �Yy Y 1 9 .,..>,..... ' W Y ,� ...;�. CL tu li Pit o► U „�4�:.H ' 600r.:[PtafaYa tall y. i Q't ulNn[ae�® W WI /� � eeaavutr Ywaanulnut � e�ai J L� K v� EE-e p•i.ID <.a•+esV TFKT NR {bt 'rrt'tan Lt4dptt Mlalrltt ppA �• FttlYVp1TT ttrltTp,at Taall Y.�, � —.•x.. ti.. rMD R•Irl a «.lrwtTwpTVUa 'c ,tit s ` - svtwtlOp � t:! tMT. tYt14lp4t i .� _ f ^ •_� A WE i'c tutTF44YV. � � _ nron caasapa, CITY OF RANCHO CLTCAMMGA PLANNINt r'VEM *EXHIBIT �. SCALE' J a . �A Ti1GHT...bIG- 14 7- =1-:- IT TT c L— m Vt ! : NORTH CffY OF i p _ LC IONGA TITU— aid lA'gi -N A , i H Ahi M DIVL90N EXHIBIT: --P sC'AI E: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Run IMMMmi Emmonq ST MWI-M, I NORTH CITY OF RANUX) WWI (6550 PLAINNM ExHiBrr---V SCALE._ e F lum 220U A Dd NORTH Cl -7, OF UCAMONGA rrEm: f x a ZINC LxViS"KA�1 EXHIBIT. SCALE. :7 n OOR a Ar.I NORTH Cl -7, OF UCAMONGA rrEm: f x a ZINC LxViS"KA�1 EXHIBIT. SCALE. L N si 22000 �Nry III i$ ,y CITY OF rmm: go-a- Inv-r- It A"-/ CUCAMONGA '�7 FL ANNM DNLSM E.XHIBTr- 'ice SCAtE. r -)0 IUHIMT In? 11 ' ■■ '1 ■■ , t� It NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CLTCA. CNGA rm�t: PI.NNIIVG UPVI.SId1V Tlu '- -.- -?. EX14IBIT:- .SCALE- LEFT SIDE eLEVATION �„���� atutnatin�u uut FRONT ELEVATION NIGHT SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION Sofa ljm am 0m 0 ii'tilixnennuunnlnnlNm1 FRONT ELEVATION NIGHT SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION Sofa LEFT SIDE ELEVATION RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 2650 C FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION NURTH CITY CF rm0° ' . RANCHO CLTCA.IVIONGA 'rrrtE: � � Pu mt DPw EXHIBIT � SCA.LE ^' NORTH CITY OF UEWDIAPIL --a R is ANUD CUCAMONnN TITLE- Rrruu W&L/,CgAf-,g c PLANNM DPOSION EXHMrr.- sCALF,. F,- LIM * i A. MITCHELL LANGE AND ASSOCIATES ?A50 BUSINESS CENTER) OR SUITE 122 =.NCH0 CUCAMONGA CA -,;f T ..+ ogq•9905 11r. John .Meyer City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 Baseline Road Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 \I c�ry�lai op Pf 4r YC y ,� �iy�Cb May 1. 1986 J6 Dear 11r, Meyer: Tract No. 1199! Hillside Road/Beryl Street Rancho Cucamonga Job �45099hI This is to serve as written notice that Nordic Development Company does not wish to construct the six -loot high block wall along Hillside Road equestrian trail as shown on the conceptual grading plan. Per our discussions, you will note this revision to your staff report, but no revisions to our plans vAll be required. In addition.. t.: - ;range w'.11 not remove this project from the Planning Commission's consent calendar for May 14, 1986. If you have any further comments on this revision, please call me as soon as possible. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation with this matter. Very truly yours, ,111TCHELL -LANCE AND ASSOCIATES By JAI.ies B. Lange, Project Enginear &ILA:JBL:jim `t cc: Mr. Hank Stanger, Nordic Development Company j Clt,'tL ENGINEERING AND LAND PLANNING UPLAND OFFICE: 8.40 West 9th Street, Suite K, Upland, CA. 91786 (714) 946 -9919 RESOLUTION NO. 8'- 135 Y+ c A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCFO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.. 11997 f� WHEREAS, Tentative `tract Map No. 11997, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Landco Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a custom lot residential subdivision into 19 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on October 26, 198,3; and WPZK'EAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Dil-sion's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at tie public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission : - of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The 'Planning Commission makes the following fir ngs in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11997 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent -with the General Plan and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of devklgpment proposed; (d) The A* :Jr; of the subdivision is-not likely to cause sub- ,z antial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now 'of record, for access through or use of` the property within the proposed subdivision. (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts an the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. (h) The final design of the development shall include variations in building layouts that will include such things as side and front entry garages, variable setbacks, and xarious architectural treatments. MI 1= Resolution No. 83- 13��� Page 2 t SECTION 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 11997, a copy of 'which is attached hereto, is -ereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The 10' equestrian train and drainage easement (south property line) shall be extended to Beryl Street for the purpose of equestrian access and police protection purposes. ENGINEERING DIVISION 2. Adequate slope protection and/or channelized improvements will be required along the easterly property line to the satisfaction of the City Enjineer and County Flood Control. 3. All lots facing Beryl Street are required to have hammerhead or circular type dri.vewa%,s. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1983. PLANN3NG-'COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: S L.,JLOUL, ATTEST ��"' Secretary of -the PTarMing Commiss"on Motion: Moved by Rempel,, seconded by McNiel, carried, to issue a Nega,�tve Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Tentative Tract 11397 with a variaoie setoacKs, and yariOLS architeeturai treatments. AYES-- COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - Carried Chairman Stout voted No for previously stated reasons. ' Planning Commission Minutes -16- October 26 1983 C ),7 - i a o�YL `♦coy c^ gy�c uq� ado aoalc au ° op"e v o. V N iIw up yt L°C4 PO V a4 L N .O .Gjr LV. N y _ �C q uq C Y iz r •y 6� i X G wq Y ^ 20. G V Y G .•G. o S• ���p Y ^? Y^q OLU C'rw YSL wN° >gL> °y L °^ ^G••. NV.0 C.. V'0 °� ♦•wi NOU - i pN NOU, NO qw Y QUO ^u�� ..Y-.0 No N q�-'u^ .r^`; Y� .N.o ova ^'GY..� �y wy ✓ •Y-x q.w .Y-� o.�,•, 4 r G -^ L ° � � 4 Q� C ��_ • a O ^O� C t N •sn N r r^ Yw pN.N.c µw° qR�' .-► N ^�.� wL °c,« us �u� �. �. a> RL N PC Pu�� u Y N N.Gj 4C LDi M. V ^u OhN •Y P� L S GNr JwG �a w.° qp - NGO P u M O OL. V N Y N �V/ O•hL p y MGY • ♦ a q CN �Ma C '.s •" yy^ N D Ms - Y .G id -N uy G ♦♦ N O G- > Y u NCC L Ouu c w Y �@pf O• . y i 0+ � L H _. pij L R Y ~ O p� G W M a 4<y.4 --v 2 0.+ T ^cV~ p•JYj„wY Ay O•L,. �Vy ep • O� CV 09Cz TC y CO Sy $° Va> {q G0 �cg€0 Kw °wrt <>qV <Nza tK^ <wL.m <a HKa .� -••tn� f-.t NG O L HI f N O C � Y J �' a � >o Y v o. • 3 Y •Rid p•. N y Y C �C q uq C Y iz r •y 6� i X G wq Y ^ 20. G V Y G .•G. o °u jL1 pVY ON. °� �F N� O uu yC N -- 5i T Gft Rum r� 6'r YGQ : P l q Y�.y w O °•Ty YQ N UN ". Y YR a •Q Yy �. C N Yw ^NN Y N ^�.� u !n9 N .5v ;5 ♦ _ S N J . y i 0+ � L H q• G L R pYp C ~ O p� W M a 4<y.4 --v 2 0.+ T A E L Y^ Oy p S `lCCI O L C Y O C � Y J �' YYwY6 otp ..ge pn op • `N` N•• M, O6 �M uQWi Y6Y ha LG �A O HOGVu m o.x O1 .Nn �c . 9 a mn � ' 2z: ME 72 AL r_8 LL c q Ks U Ogpt�S•°^Cq G G.Nr 3 d v E u ^ LOO 4 CUU y C q� p U 6qu a`EUUc TL Cd. 4".E L}w i ^ ^�y EEO Qp • c ,° 0'-�9' x E� LNN N. FOw90 r b t u C i =x 0 d N ���•' .°.nSbY nb.� U _ yq, .`i�� i°+V 7 J.t° E♦: UYF O 6 E N N O T 'b .. �°o E -} n C , u Ca pY pEi_ E UD p0 b.e aEe .CC Eu Am •'• O1 °c�:: °V.o- °`o bOgN Yo.^Y pia 'C l C O A ate. a° 7e�`c' -°y R-2,5. �� •�. r.WZ -x boa rY' ..C. •n „ GL NM. u� b U i Su.UEq . v � U =�� ui. SOU vEN:aou'^iR Lu'^u can d � yCY•D Z. j�v�a c u . r.���•+q0 O" y ... •^ � Ga >- u � 9 V A u u C x qL..0 � x o uc� a €�a,aNe mE.iu:;d �- Z^ °iya" >oyy.... u A. y N E N E o r f:� Gy A GAO O N o OS w- M d 0 EqC .b. y0 n o U,y W 9 g ro S N o N U O.0 -�=�„ iC nb —%5 = C Or u VC-- 7 CT ou.•b- iaiih E. �UL-� ipgi =u U e u d~7 T,0. >a�idu.o" 1 cu vU ^9.hN C..Oa CI x °uE Sba u^ NU NL O Y�oLb.Ee dy .-.� OY�T C�Sit. o M N C E y y m,�`°� yU u C O O 9b uOU �F'•.N wU.. b y q a^ p 2 u 9 � u E L C u br.....� qC L 9 6 a .- c c -G C •^, o c W r O N Y E O'9 u .4 U b +- O S x L • ,NC F-n GC 6Euo. 9 LLN FZ 60L S6 p nq , �3 MLM� tipV Sx qi•c' -F-MN a 64N fa 0 m o.x O1 .Nn �c . 9 a mn � ' 2z: ME 72 AL r_8 LL c q Ks U Ogpt�S•°^Cq G G.Nr 3 d v E u ^ LOO LLaiuU O. Oo no� u E u Yu0 r NUUu 6 au 9 N V Nb V y" L °O S "x .. NL Y .C-- C ET x•.O, x u NLxaupauiu Q.Qiv cEquS a x Y bOgN Yo.^Y y^ c ate. a° i E r.WZ -x boa i N�°q 6 9 C u O l N o c E 9. E y q d O q C M N L L f T A P v C E Y N N f C U n ac u A. y L a d U Sony i f u 0 9 2 o OS w- M d 0 •,.. E 9 N 1- c O. W 9 g ro S N o N U ¢^ a .- a V —%5 = C u d~7 r.u� C� � L ^^d 0• CWp�.q �O OUO ^, b 2v O rn � c .a a .r OC y y m,�`°� yU u C O c U 9 ui 9b uOU �F'•.N wU.. b y q a^ p O i�.°- .-r q x U O p °`� 9 � v.9 br.....� qC L Nn Ye.• ••- V K�xa N9q � V 4V U r 4V qu. Oi•^ hM�[xC gqu4{.� y�C fa u v A a O1 .Nn �c . 9 a mn � r 3 v a Yip d'� b x u C Ly L ° � A sa bu�ei x u in^ O 9 u C Z u . _ i C u 9C b u n I U y" L °O S C Y .C-- ct ad fo as c^' ua.r vm� :ua bYUy `G' ro d r 4 t L MG hC� P °ro q7j - d 4 ra�V' tl n r u9 N Math E tl. avOUQ b nVa ' d� O•-•C— Ey L � ULaN ... • �S ^. —S ^Cd 04L N� Q 4. �y w.S TyN tlL GV rd =LG6 ov ��. rn Lb Gib Nby yd =q� q�b� _ qvp GEQ 69 a u.LO °. qd MY. d w F a .. w pu0q uE L'. Yo n�yq dvais mv. 9 t OY TU' d it ad's o« � �Nd r n C Y No d as b> 9 o 7 N.OG N1r T � ✓. C.dp f�q ti U O d —i o qy Mz q � ` —o Nd wb vwV dN COf�� --C 1v b q .5 66 q O u. Q I( NI 14� f1 LL 0• d^ o at.. O d M O b a 0 q` c d L C O 3 x O u g 0. L N d p 46i L0 �1Ya� d q a:2 ^p vL P— N U NwNd GT MC GNi qyd [L^�L S .G. —yCOd L r Eca i Sb Stt y =E � b OOyd� ^—G � y. G — d q C • — �q. wC .... a. L p L o_ IGgL °_ 6 qq godo ;b,0 °w'EV _ K � adiN�grvoi M� L wO p. d r~N U —G.q. 4 � CE LNb PEE gt3td O �.Qa C�VY C X 0 0 � u U ,^ � L O Ol N C• 6 oB a d N GL `.d pYQi D �S VULLM y f`. 4.y d 4 L �L E� p Nft V V Ed °�`y 6 49. �ON��O p 6K6q CL WW 062N —NqN 4Yf.+ Qa <N SY.OJd 1 N�. �� • PI N `J � � \YYYaaatiiYrr Y i c -ate • � �`n .aV aL • OY LC C. Ya4 � O.�d "Z D C r uT U C • C ✓E F.t a .' 1� .+E a =O` V �O C Y a.w tEo Elr EEE �OLO Uy4l nb 01C N .� �` O r j OiU. � Y L ytaNO �. d i[ �+ LX YM a L L ��� war u L u d g b T• �� Y � d N E Y li a�i N A C V GO y 0 0 e• dyY GO ^�aau �. � a..� uk a ;S bi a� u � ei C R G CO 6 � � ro ay n d p C,y •.q '=L .yn� Y� er y� �a mania 3oq o'er rG--. y�x O' {i.Ln d Y g w i C O 4� E c. O y 3 ✓ y, » C .r b N M1 8 q �' CO L NE Flo vw NQ^j ai . Y .5 Y. ru c a� vP Oae NV �r �a Ysb.. l�-L�V vim ro Ai: ro o 00 dNi a°y'Aea q OL y o Ev�NO al N L�rn� • e L '.- d� . Lny RE .� tiEC° 6�py naW1.1 otGCYiL 6w ot-C t L N N C u-~.. cE 4Y� iuN9 C V i .X,ai. �4 N� Otp� [l�6I4w ¢OtV 4uw'w.0 { .C. NI F � � E � uo � C uo .urn Y ti °c a N T 4yc ro •i .mow. u •� C N. p 'q' LF 2 a N Y U nC C Ubq b mC6 M,.We ''C^ Y u V r C WU Y 9 OY-Gp � V CuV= �LpV ar L ° V aN G �^ UL�eEi h as 4 D cN .COp� � do LdY I Q u T c e . N F dW `u C Y9 6'lN HYi 4L 00i P C � �. L uau V E L oia.w . �E L d o ro o E ro ^ wyM W Y U Y c O d F a A Y A t d 4 dC .O fIY r a .V N q."'y EEy�r .^.r la X aL W L 4 LA L N l �a t L rnEW 4 n6aG .y 4ID C Lro 6p G 6W�WI}. T 'alt a c WET LYOa 4a �f'+ n YuU °' TDY K m � O... L v. `UC LL.f3p� eI aDa D d47 YvYa _ C > h w C -a) O 41 U v •n O a R� I � VY•. `Qn J I4 0 1. 1 C wi- z VIJ Cam{• ra. ^ at L d rn « w W O �.= L EC 9 N a t L ..nC � d Y C � v c e ° w ° v N n a. E. yO V •y an d •.° -`v. C .. = E E i C •_ y o N . � b b. ° N d �� n n ?� r .°. n u L � .- j� � •' M r u s ^« 4' S do 3 C M° a4C •o mN•`+ W m n0� E n• v 2 i .`.q « C� d C L n E O K.,c. cy e v 2 E a } °o EYu L`yN OV » aeE N C uYi Y « od N yE tea^ do d.^•. N� �� aN NVL'��m •°r RG d ° e�N. Ci d.T. • YL V N r °• 9 d ...N a ^mom `°yO vdc uyi rn dog Cp —_ c9 •L •—p` q ^Ci 7`G K^ °V d ` S Etc-, t A V:..L� hu9ii 4. •caG O6�E�i lr¢aa Q°U UO CdiW y F aiic 9 21 �I bl ^� r•I C;. �� � i NI R� I � VY•. `Qn J I4 0 1. 1 C wi- z VIJ ti6 I DG 1 I Ll ^� N NN Q s � v W s H _ d N E a u Lo I -1°9 VY•. `Qn L•d 1. 1 C rn.dwmvE Y Ln n d d = E E i C •_ Ot y ud ♦a ° 6 `' d — mo d � b b. ° N d �� n n ?� r .°. n u L � .- j� � •' M r u s ^« 4' S do C M° a4C •o mN•`+ W m n0� d nod .`.q Ey t C� d IKa 'fi L n E O K.,c. cy c�raYl � i ° } °o EYu L`yN OV » aeE SEE Tu o C uYi Y « od RG d ° e�N. Ci d.T. • >s E 9 V N r °• 9 d ...N a ^mom `°yO vdc uyi rn dog Cp —_ c9 ^E o aG ds21` 6VVY NCO DNS OcH {V 6•`+'�pY t A V:..L� hu9ii 4. •caG O6�E�i lr¢aa Q°U UO CdiW y � � +^ aiic 9 21 V V d C O O` L U9 P u C_a -J Eu c ° q • ° L r. T � o a ^u p Z T C nO y �•E�=y d L NC ^ O d uw Nub TY o� N �- qCy m o ...d �b w� N� E06 G b lE a YL E 6 iAY L qo iA N l V-p T N x Y S U Q ^ 9 µ' Z t O o q L U L N a u € L w C q� b pYV. O o °p D �-2 O U a9 xw ��aM'C vu d A S Cz I vt � °a6 L OA L ` C G 40- � b•1? ..a.. uT �9 �b LL,C. a a 0 �'+ F +• 46N 6N z= O. yy S•^- F^M KM 4Nj C� i a I I . - YoY L • -' y N« ✓ «c« sL°. 'oY au .a « yU Y W L Y N Lia w OOAa� w +i. T V U N y C >--g D. P o y A d xe4Q yN 4 '� 6d Obi Md M C -09M C a 4 G 9~ O D N C L «Lm Nt c Zor o Lp °E EOai4. M a 4W E LL ^u y °Y q b N rnb � '4 y OL d pi geZi O N'Op N « et yLU 'a N- ww 2 N m`a ..tj d T n ^ « by • i O• d L v T x L q ,a.. ��1� U �,s G u iq yW L U a O C y .°..L ° C Aga u~ 6° DOS ytp ti rL•b ub qa a u` a «c o N o'&L° — c- t- EL 2� 1. z1 � v v i co E O ` It _ CC � ° q L 6 L 3 a ° ^Y.• ^A Ld L N 4' N °d .O N� TL T w O die NY Y^ «�tX aLVC `LU tJD� YDC ^W Nb ° Yy G`. C AU tin, C _ L W wu0 r TY p .� T BUI^ u yLy VC a C «y dCJY >,L r N xN 4d E .N a• CO NLt ya-Ir ¢ V NGSYq 6yN HUyo R C NNtt Cu %L m� DL Lt y V 36 t-ia y O r O U QJ 0 L a N y ` • O H p ~S Ub OdND Oy Y u. t O Q T %� um y 6 F U c.>-.y ode ,I! ¢q y Sq LAb (' Y CC dm�T TY u R'S Wit '•� r O dU U� O _ �a 0y G °N 4 N � LL0. 66 H`•�`� dpi U.UO • U 11 BL E i i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION O{ THE- RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIG.+t REVIEW FOR TRACT 'NO. 11997 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HILLSIDE AND BERYL IN THE VERY LOW DENSITY.['ESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 26th day of March, 1986, a complete application was filed by Nordic Development Company for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th day of May, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning . Coar.ission held a meeting to consider the above- described pr;,",ect. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the f,Ilowing can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of'' the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tract 11997 is approved subject to the fo o{f ring conditions and aitached Standard Conditions (Items 1 thru 4 shall receive City Plav er approval prior to issuance of building permits): 1. A Plst`2200 shall be placed on Ueryl Avenue. 2. A second Plan 1850 siall be placed on Eastwood. 3. A bay window shall be used on Plan 1850 -B. 4. Plan 2200 shall have upgraded brick or rock veneer chimney_, s. 5. The 18" diameter Walnut tree located at the corner of Hillside and Beryl shall be preserved. I 6. All conditions of Resolution No. 83435 shall be :liet. C -a 4 Resolution - Tract 11)97 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby pertify that the foregoing Res6Tution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS. NOES: COMMISSMNERS: ABSENT: COMMIsSIONERSc �', t r] DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GAO G�S�Mp,1,�9 z t � o A May 14, 1986 �) Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission 1977 Brad Buller, City Planner Debra Meier, Assistant Planner TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -02 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY ---The development of three warehouse distribution buildings totaling 463,210 square feet :on 22.09 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial Zone (Subarea 9) located at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and 8th Street - APN 229- 111 -08, 09.. I. BA KCROW i: The Lincoln Property Company has requested a minimum one -year extension to the above described project. Development Review 84 -02 was originally approved April 25, 1984 for a two year period. A time extension request was filed on April 24, 1986 (see attached letter). Phase One of the project (Buildings A & B) is complete and in the leasing phase. They intend to begin Phase Two (Building C) when leasing of Phase One is complete. II. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension with the development criteria outlined in the City's Industrial Area :Specific Plan. Based upon this review, the project meets all Industrial Area Specific Plan requirements. The maximum time period for Development Review approval is four years. Therefore, the Planning Commission could grant up to a 24 month extension to May 14, 1988. III. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends a 24 month extension to May 14, 1988. R ectfully bmi�tted, Bt ad Buller City Planner BB:DM:das Attachments. Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Building Elevations (Building A Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations (Building 8) Exhibit IV - Building Elevations (Building C) Original Resolution of Approval with Conditions Time Extension Resalutinn 3 ITEM D ak April 24, 1986 VIA MESSENGER Mr. Scott Murphy I Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917,01,) Re: Project File No, DR8,' -02 Lincoln Distributiot',Ceiater Rancho Cucamonga Rochester Avenue at ;'q.ght.'z Street Dear Scott: As you instructed me in our telephone conversation on Wednesday, April 23, enclosed is a check for $62 to extend the expiration date of the above- referenced project. As we discussed, Phase I is complete and in the lease -up pha3e, and we intend to commence Phase II when leasing is complete. Accordingly, we ask that the validity of the approval bf extended at least one year and preferably two years. - Thank you for your assistance, Sincerely, , LINCOLN PIZOPERTY COMPANY X4 Bill Shubin Project Managsr BS:ll enc. RCCCIVED- -CITy OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION APR 24 1986 pY AN 7(81g1�pI�1L11I�I�iglsPS 2415 Campus Drive 1, Suite 201 Irvine. CA 92715 (714) 8SI -5122 6 v PARTIAL ROM rARTw. RoRT>f mar i ow r PARTIAL XQUTtI. )�`tl`''�.• _. 111111 y►'...__1�ii '. :� o ��11 to ri ri � �f .tnma! �C .J NORM j CITY CF rr M 24• o2 RANCHO CUC mO NTGA - LANNM DWLWq "YHIBtT -- G ; Ex , y raaTAZaoara PARTAI NORTN` _ - wj.7�T P$ATAL swim . 4 �. ELEYAl1pN38tDp;;� �v�n�w�. i MTH CITY OF _ RANCHO C,,CAMCiNQA: SCAM:. `J t _ - WEST i pum t f { i •.�^ EAST .I F' - ELEYADON$91Dfi.Ci...:.awaaw. L� NORTH ORTH a1 a OF _ RA NC�-Kj CUC MONGA TM LE- LEU,4TID1�1 PLANNDr,. D 1ISION EXHIBIT- -�. SCALE.., _ -- RESOLUTION NO. 84 -39 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION - APPROVING OEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -02, LINCOLN PROPERTY f COMPANY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE NORTH OF 8TH STREET IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT j (SUBAREA 9) t WHEREAS, on the 3rd day of March, 1984, a complete applicati:an was filed by Lincoln Property Company for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on :the 25t1, day of April, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga ' Planning � g Comm' fission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. � r NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolvei as R follows: t SECTION I: That the following can be met: i 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and i . 3. That The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code r and 14. That the proposed' use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on April 25, 1984. i SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -02 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Warehouse building elevations shall be texturized) or sandblasted accent strips provided in order to provide visual interest to the structures. s Resolution No. 34 -39 ##- r Page 2 D ENGINEERING DIVISION` I. A lien agreement shall be required for the construction of the easterly half of the proposed cul -de -sac street at the west project boundary prior to issuance of building permits. An irrevocable offer of dedication of the street right -of -way shall be made to the City. 2. A lot line merger shall be recorded prior to issuance of building _permit to eliminate the lot t line across the building. 3. A storm drain system shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer through the project site to intercept runoff from the northerly procierties, The system shall be connected to the existing storm drain on 8th Street and a permit from k AT & SF railroac shall be obtained prior to issuance [ of building permit. 4. An on -site or off -site storm water retention facility per City standard shall be constructed tQ retain the excess runoff created by the development. This condition may be waived after formation of the Assessment district for Day Greek construction. a. Standard Condition number N -4 -may also be waived at the formation of 0Z Day Creek Assessment District. 6. An irrevocable reservation for an easement for railroad purposes shall be made for the benefit of tf, northerly properties for the purpose of future .lead or drill track service. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25th DAY OF APRIL, 1984. PLAN( OMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ BY• �M�" ze —Rt0Qfi/ Denn i s Stout, - hya�i rman lLT � ATTEST: ! i Ri/ck Gomez, Deputy Secretary t' y. d Resolution No. 84 -35� Page 3 i I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Vancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a.regu'iar meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of April, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: k ol U lu I• Aft F E u� O 4• N W O b � c aqy uc 6E° ..Aa n AY° mi m' Ac On a .1 ° Tc as v u L unu 3 6p °Oz liq IdU Tye b2` C q NO qP O L C UY CO C. 4; C29 -Zq Y N�� TAO Y 2 iwM. b� Nq nt ail, _ it sec 6 • 3 C �S way b �a.D C p • .. t.. N � �l u .g+' O nb� tq b�N. yam~ c o.p CO ° C C F N� nQa �v S V..n b C Q ac AOy Y upE E mu E NL Hue E om.°-. j a •� b cu 4� a= vw a ,...� � oa �c t n'- bE uN au u^ •p LS �a C oQ up q OY q � ° ^ N � . ^ b g q G n + €Q a p � q C }. qq C T c� O •a-N ° v C ` t t c N 4M�DY QO.AO 6Ya u Q aat ¢p ° °uu cN�c' .F wo m wa p qn i nN ° N wa AZ no. I 1'l� V� V . N Yf p 2i •� F E u� O 4• N W O H b � c aqy e` c ai .odo mi m' .1 as v u L unu 3 ol q c nt ail, _ it sec � � a G q^ N ucep yam~ c o.p CO ° C C F N� nQa �v S V..n b C Q ac AOy Y upE v b uNE NL Hue b yp p6j a •� b cu 4� wc°` w'•'.... y 'oo _ `O` N'� Ncc log N o. c p° b no. b ° N. ci a. u2 u >b ra Ica ^I N LO I 1'l� V� V . N Yf p 2i •� H Im 0 >� E v fi _a2 NaL A n v� nE 0. PF LOd 0. ° E.y C.« 43 o n o c - •• rs O O L 2 N ... °Vn L E «V O +N � NO LOaC Ldn� ^vG E� c_ c.� a•� Ev nES� 4d LuF. 00 e-- E ._ 'd^C'•nHUO au d i�� [,._`. t rn�.-c iL _o a C u •• = • ^"uo.dn «. �^ 0 r ` V o V` 1 a M q e`m ` JOE d d E C +e o L S O L c w G.d G o d L o� I «_ u +aau HaE. •C .' ° �T '°'d« _"^. ^� _ Nom. om ^"Q2 -LUNY .s..`• «... o'�n �°.CNi hQ�N .~ o,9 Y � N E H '� n Y .� d Y� F d N •� ui � U �� t d n « � � u� W « u 4 P a ° N O « A C � C E C O Y LE A3 d o end ° ^_ 0. t Y. o« E c��h >r E Y Q _✓ a o C d EE4 Y�A.rn E a V w�T BE �O CE6L0. ON O y. D. � c 0.ut 64 0.VL «A- da aNP Rl Nr L F N.d„ O A••c•E0 ^ L q..°- A O w.. D n ii �' C °.0 a E U O N« Na�E A c O. pcA Ni 6L L O% •' ° NL«v��� 'O O r 3 L O d y �HC Sao V >aQCH A L�F OtiF 0.« GP Y >_ = L ra °: a • -� °uua °. ° dCP. �° QY zoo 9aL'- C YL vin Nn_N� Ca G �C 6E «6 1-L 6046D. 0.�S.w A wL.°i.T Uy E 0.�u�. °Cn >> V q q q 0 ECE ..� °d.�> > d n N n0.` v -1w a� a.�. N 3i r 0. ri Im 0 _a2 NaL u° Cm a nv omwd Al, t 6d '.« °O 0.o Nd aAe aooNn «.v Ow J C d Fl�Kgw c_ CAE a�s� LH« "E.J.� "• o y M Qua �C� «Y s~'•� `LCEA NLTq� +aau n u = nN d -O A'-c a^ oe Nom. om ^"Q2 -LUNY .s..`• «... o'�n �°.CNi hQ�N C V dt c To C CEy 6E u20. 7 .+° C CY qy � OaA°T Y NO N°. •n y d� E.'r • vi.�a U C E rn a � 9 • �. n9 A Ly ad3 d. j�v w �Sar aad C tdLi V NE Y N Sao d�� c a', v.- A?NONd� cga .- 9T °'dam yOtL 9aL'- C YL vin Nn_N� Ca f C6Cd ••atu FAO « Uy E 0.�u�. °Cn >> V q q q 0 ECE ..� °d.�> > d n N n0.` v -1w a� a.�. N 3i r 0. CE OZa 10Lau aL �a �. Y •„GOB O O. N d0 > sL O �Or y -Z 79 q G {°J C� >yc V 6�NF. '3, G' 0 r. U aJV d d a N o� C <Y CO nw a+c• !- �•J[NC q. Q < ✓<.V N� L cCE16 • �i ^ice I 1 f Im 0 Cu7 i= r.e Dc wrq a`°a° co. o•Yi .i yA O L N n�LL°. Syt pG0,66 O Y Y 6LL 4y L C � •• N y� G N . ND a Y Cd G °= sA C EaEi"Y NN ON t u _4C V' G O,c D V q i d b V L � c � � A O Y�o t a T G•-^^ n G °� � p w- U O G d O O L n q E y. S L O L O• Na Y aTVa �N p Y,�.�N bcq pGwS�d O = c Z�Cto Y T q} m+ C -c LOO b _ ^�^ `._. vuL iUC c •'Y^bi., «,mAo EL. a tyd uNY�FN °6.q �OCI.T r G VINOY.ia N2 I 00 - a..c aY mL� Cpgp. xo t na °'a^+i x ..-y., i ... C Yr°a a -2 :3-z ♦ 6��p. bN YZ LN OM YO C o� Y a:.'c, o °m 'u.. o ° s � T u .+n•- Y 61 ° nN` - Y� r`o Nx N °+L.. ^•8 u�o °ova, . °. °- .�-, r_N Yan .�. >O L S Uy.,LO, a� °1a NCy Exlr~(� 4Pd ap8N CO W4v60..3 v)...xgw 6x 4A° C'N �N. CIY O Za uZ O me T ^ii+jj a C TON A y ;a Cam. A 'U x� OGq L. x .. 3C Nr. b ASV OOd! U x� O L K� °� Ym 94 E•..` ��. LLGq E y �° t LN rj� p a.=.yY r`O L C V P^ 3 3 C K c er 4 'f+ a L a O pY j _Y NeS� Y dLO xq l A rE eo mom. G. a�tTi Tu. E� uLA. ��� a bCC 00 °• E .E °. NaV A3 xa �L6r �q � 464 O[°i Q• O;Ir � •�` • H � �, a1 LL + 1 Cu7 i= r.e Dc wrq a`°a° co. o•Yi .i yA O L N n�LL°. Syt pG0,66 O Y Y 6LL 4y L C � •• N y� G N . ND a Y Cd G °= sA C EaEi"Y NN ON t u _4C V' G O,c D V q i d b V L � c � � A O Y�o t a T G•-^^ n G °� � p w- U O G d O O L n q E y. S L O L O• Na Y aTVa �N p Y,�.�N bcq pGwS�d O = c Z�Cto Y T q} m+ C -c LOO b _ ^�^ `._. vuL iUC c •'Y^bi., «,mAo EL. a tyd uNY�FN °6.q �OCI.T r G VINOY.ia N2 I 00 - a..c aY mL� Cpgp. xo t na °'a^+i x ..-y., i ... C Yr°a a -2 :3-z ♦ 6��p. bN YZ LN OM YO C o� Y a:.'c, o °m 'u.. o ° s � T u .+n•- Y 61 ° nN` - Y� r`o Nx N °+L.. ^•8 u�o °ova, . °. °- .�-, r_N Yan .�. >O L S Uy.,LO, a� °1a NCy Exlr~(� 4Pd ap8N CO W4v60..3 v)...xgw 6x 4A° C'N �N. CIY N^a d d4 c < A • O EL+aTi � 4 C A m v yu y`c E ETC IRE €EL Aed « u�o; « rn b Cw AG y L UU E u GC_ d L i ark u. n E9 ac. you v r`a o• «4dy ov do u t T(I! .^•.ac0 2aa i++. w d y O tl yCl r ^.d. CST u<RU U C ^V •� b�W�. EEb ^�.. A~ TW U RL OC` C. 2a L tiW p� b UqV CVO A' NO L O O de •E W n n N C •- On n 6 Cm Afi 4C emu_ C d WOEC � L` V; — ° • N S _. fl -1 _ dd =� � yFyi.� �vDAi VO _ .•c CT w L. O cd G1 p�L E y v ^p «y - •" ».n aTv'. G= ^�� UAVyN wo. oop, - U Fq�.ES dO D `i aVc AC dAL. •+> NE • C'eJG �9.CUU dd QS �� Or YqO GE y� 26Y. `u �f„OLV ea ^dNUd «�••Td Lm6q. A d d4 yo ooffao ff gym v �d 9UC n�D.D '_'•gD mad 1iN .r to U� WMb W �4 fA�CA67, 4O1Y QU4.p ri Y. N^a d d4 c < A • O EL+aTi � 4 C A m v yu y`c E ETC IRE €EL Aed « u�o; « rn b Cw AG y L UU E u GC_ d L i ark u. n E9 ac. you v r`a o• «4dy ov do u t T(I! .^•.ac0 2aa i++. w d y O tl yCl r ^.d. CST u<RU U C ^V •� b�W�. EEb ^�.. A~ TW U RL OC` C. 2a L tiW p� b UqV CVO A' NO L O O de •E W n n N C •- On n 6 Cm Afi 4C emu_ C d WOEC � L` V; — ° • N S _. fl -1 _ A I i ; wu�` o+°.n en.N -• l• ece PO uw t0 NJ PYL�v wo S o y S� wFMG n sa a } ^T�7 yOfoivv U= rW v t�1 b t; 2 W ' L w0 1M 1 YT V, Eby CL ,• °' e w VDU °•n Y ^4� T��'q�t Mw3v2 nL w^ g :s wUNL VS. C �� �' � U l a p N L p L E - L � Yom• w° V O G V ° = '� r v Y Y � m.-.o caY HOC. - 04, °L' Cu �w`•O w•= ° 4CZ7 Q Y9N+ O 6.2 .o �� p C >ti C � L •'oN � O A.Gy6 YLY y Y u L L A. G TO C ^.• O.L N G w CC � o Nd Y Y w ^tea �, a° �. n ••. •^ jp w G L. n � L�noa .°roy E; c a.°. Y = •°• ^L c " E u C c.T w� Y.° unq N- C a w J • 4�'.� v.L E w N - a p as L a6 go L L` v ^ An •Y. LV d L 1r^ °q C � YYpV w�QW= an a[A rne. ^a w °ARyC yVy S ^ y..t E N�j z pa C Y N 0 9 p 6° N .� u E L w VN ^" N L VL !•Y,Y 9• �CO BOO ^aaN `r. N ~^ wwp�. Y al LO a Y/ CN EV°^ `EOGE.sv y YVIA N w dY E _ -4-2, Yw E E CY dN• l_C 7W- 11 T w N.w Y a Y G C Lc;I 8.2 Lt yQ A I i ; wu�` o+°.n en.N -• ece PO uw t0 NJ PYL�v wo S o y S� wFMG n sa a } ^T�7 yOfoivv U= rW v t�1 b t; 2 W ' 1 yr LEA U C A coa wu�` o+°.n en.N -• ece PO N E PYL�v wo S o •�Cm wFMG n �aC a } ^T�7 yOfoivv U= 2 G b t; i�SGg H zz °' a w VDU °•n Y ^4� T��'q�t Mw3v2 nL w^ g :s wUNL VS. C L = • L �� M6 ww CC = 4. 4CZ7 _ V1 R 6.2 .o qY y` L •'oN Eau ^n Eli _ .. `8.'"- Yo L�noa .°roy nooa^oa a.°. Y uui. a vod °u •Y+ N o.T o n._L- .N.o�. Is lac v._$..w. YN� c.T w� Y.° unq N- C a w J • 4�'.� v.L E w E °ww - a p as L a6 go L p16� y v ^ An •Y. LV d L 1r^ °q C � YYpV w�QW= an a[A rne. ^a w °ARyC yVy S y..t Lo s G s' L - u• z pa C Y N 0 9 aoc P O� p 6° N .� u E L w wC ^ ^" N L y '\. O Y L !•Y,Y 9• Cl°I L... wVCyTN ^aaN `r. N ~^ wwp�. Y C9 CN a V `EOGE.sv y YVIA L Yay C9 qQ •Cn O ..TAO' ;.2v _ °q � C E E CY dN• l_C 11 T w O Y a Y G C 0 0 8.2 Lt yQ 0 Ln I C O L Y 9 •a 4 New Y P t OItIYY+. L r O O V :.o Y U. yy » E • Y �d U L LO a aa� Y .. - y;, Y. Y r y P E yi„�YU • a 's �.0 y N Ly ° = T oY°. ^L i n n u MOF U V L- w aN C. L S. h�Y yt y Y 7r vH k t N p = PO V o z P y Q .O Cy � •x ¢p QL E .L.�° C ... .O .- UP �4. O O V S Q N •- = C G E" V n O� Y u = u. C. V a� P `V� Z_ ms 90o- L ESA aC 'y°m dx u 6 u u V S yyo .on iP �4 1to ^7 LO p �paYN ° a>.& '+c Dt C- v u. � � °� a P> d ° w d s y c� L •" q n� v +•. v tN YE` cn�- Yip f U q q C � m y d Zis 'cum y 6 p A L L �a.•, �a K q N aC eayiE _ dU yv N n wV bU 9d� �� J- u S t kz.� 6 Mn; K.5 � YN n � NI - M U�..O. Y.P TU �Y W. LT LW U G1V V7aa O C O L Y 9 •a 4 New Y P t OItIYY+. L r O O V :.o Y U. yy » E • Y �d U L LO a aa� Y .. - y;, Y. Y r y P E yi„�YU • L. �.0 y N Ly ° T oY°. ^L MOF U V L- w aN C. L S. h�Y yt N 1 Yu�• '.' YN Y L L u Gans •V- w V S Q N •- = C G E" V n O� Y u q M L u. C. V a� P `V� a W OTU ^M .� i s ESA aC 9- L y 2 pi'i. Y L .o a Cvf r.y ° uiV cVY0.. 4.+ 'pW 4ULL V �4 1to ^7 LO p �paYN E MV Dt C- v u. � � °� a P> d ° w d s y c� L •" q n� v +•. YE` Y Fop 9 6 6 d p G E 6 p A L L 12e n d 4~ � YN � r M U�..O. Y.P TU �Y W. LT LW U G1V V7aa aL LN 't U.w : OLN ..�. W 9 NUV1S!` iV E q� :,s NO�P Ni Vv U 6Y� p,.=. Wyp�lLY a6 .54 .• 6 -lip La v � � .. t . � \ �&Iq C - - )f /,i !k / . . 5 ). ZS } { )E {E k�/ . C . . � \ �&Iq C RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -02 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above- described project, pursuant to Section 17.02.100 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission - conditionzlly approved the above - described Development Review 84 -02. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has .jade the foil owing if tcTags: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for development of the oject. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at the time. C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. 0. That the granting of said tifie extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or Welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in tl:_. vicirFjty. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby - grants a time extension or: Project Applicant Expiration OR 84 -02 Lincoln Property Co. May 14, 1988 i APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DA. OF MAY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. ou , ia_rman a ATTEST: 7A Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION May 14, 1966 DR 8402 Page k I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and-- adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a rEgular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May, 1966, by the following vote -.to -wit: AYES: COM14SSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: D-11 CITY OF RANCH* CUCAMONGA T AM" REPORT E DATE; May 14, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: :,ad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner CG�a G ICAX fok r o F $ Z v 1977 SUBJECT: FINAL TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12171 - H N r� - A custom lot su division of six lots on acres o and in the Very Low (VL) District, located at the northwest corner of Klusman Avenue and Whirlaway Street - APN: 51 U6 -07. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant, Stephenson, is requesting a final one year time extension for Tentative Tract 12171 as descrioed above, The project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on May 26, 1982. A two-year time extension was approved by Planning Commission on May 23, 1984. II. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzea the proposed time extension and has compared the proposal with the development criteria outlined in the they BasicvResidentialaDevelopmentpStandards of the ment eehtDevelop meets Code for the Very Low District except for the minimum net average lot area of 22,500 square feet. This tract's average lot size is approximately 20,678 square feet. All lots within this tract do n,aet the minimum lot size requirement of 20,000 square feet. Equestrian easements have not been provided for this tract and the property owner /applicant orignally intended that the keeping of Committeeurecommendednth t thetexistingsdrainagegeasement serve equestrian easement along the west and south tract boundaries, and that said easement be reflected on the final tract map and final grading and drainage plan. The Standard Condition of approval (A -23) regarding providing trails was made a requirement of Tentative Tract 12171. ITEM E PLAnNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12171 Steph_nson play "14, 1986 Page 2 II1. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the final extension of twelve months. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner i BB :CW :cv Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - May 23, 1984 Time Extension Staff Report Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit "C" - Site Utilizat on Map _ Exhibit I'D" Map Exhibit °' - Grading Plan Resolutim t -52 Time Erten�*�n Resolution of Approval a� GENERAL VENTURES INCORPORATED 16776 BERNARDO CENTER DRIVE SUITE 1108 SAN DIEGO:, CALIFORNIA 92128 (619)'485-8920 Citv of Rancho Cucamonga April 24, 1986 Planning Division 97-40 Baseline Read P.O. Sox 867 Rancho Cucamonga, Cal. 91730 r k We have enclosed a check in the amount of Sixty Two Dollars ($63.00) to extend our ar raved project No. 12171 . We are requesting this extension because is has bpzn economically unfeasible to complete the plan heretofo,-e,- With interest rates cr%ing down to the present levels, we believe it is now very feasible for as to complete the project. i Thank you fcr your consideration. i; Sincerely, i T. G. Stephenson P- esi RECEIVED— dent CITY OF RANCHO CUCA(NONGA i. P.c. Carol Kelly IANNING DIVISION APR 2 81986 ° -, A�? PSG ot �1$191IQ�1I112121ti(3,4iut� , DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJEC": CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 23, 1984 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Rick Gomez, City Planner Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner TIME_ EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12171 - STEPHENaON A custom lot subdivision of six lots on 3.3 acres of land in the Very Low (VL) District, located at the northwest corner of Klusman Avenue and Whirlaway Street - APN 511- 06 -07. I. BACKGROUND- The applicant, Stephenson, is requesting a ore —year time extension for Tentative Tract 12171 as described abn:*a. The project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on May ?6, 1982. Ii. ANALYSI"- Staff has analyzed the pi- oposed time extension and has compared the proposal with the development criteria outlined in the City's newly adopted Development Code. Based upon this review, the project meets the Basic Residential Development standards of the Development Code for the Very Low Distri%, except for the minimum net average lot area of 22,500 square feet. This tract's average lot size is approximately 20,578 square feet. All lots within this tract do neet the Minimum lot size requirement of 20,000 square feet. Ill. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Division recommo -ids a final extension of two years. IR granting the final extension for the two year period, the Planning Commission is finding under Section 17.02.0200 -7 that subdivisions and developments of property pursuant to a tentative tract map or tentative parcel map which has been approved pursuant to tFe provisions of earlier ordinance of the City and which is in conflict with this ordinance may be continued and completed in accord with the provisions of the approval, provided it is completed within the time limit in effect t the ti of its approval. ,r Reset.. submitted, Rick omaz City anr�eh ka:FD:ns I 'i i / NC44ia 44W Litirr i I _ t } i ~ I .t _ t I NURTH CITY OF T ITBI:__ A'f IZf-a1 ? r : c o cLTcA1VIONGA TITI :_ k PI- AIVNINr "iVISIO\1 EXHIBIT& SCALj : ts. a FlAf Fc %'Ndd'A'NG � � ! wi.fr c f . • !Oti': xc� P /Ffk'i. T-�• � �X /4T ON 9/: E � � —J I U LJ J ?V 44 L� ' L �� ! I I3N.liK 91:1✓ • - - -- ti v ti F9 1 _ NORTH TTY OF 1TEA4: G RANCHO CLTCA -1\ A0.i \T`sA TITLE- PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT(�,- SCALE, -NTS^ u 1= \ry yI n7o TENTArIVE "MAOT NO 12171 IN THE C" OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA 0 COUNTY OF AN BERNAROINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NDRTH CITY OF ITEM. RANCHO CLTCAMOiNGA TITLE ST 1?-1-71 Mpp PLANNING I DIVISION EXHIBIT. t:::' SCALE: �1q[Ri N/N'f At tdr r 1..wu nw df ter 9 .. J /,y `an. rA14�ti. L,.sa � F f�•x` r _ t ♦ `I ' '.`• � , � � f �. r �, «r ham: -`.. x � \� --• ` t •' �.�e— Nr'-C: t�l-` — f �_ � _ of .t�.�•'`;`: h= ^� n�.vra� .. � 1 -4'sR' vmc f 1 ! ,r; n�fsrrd'" u�i"vr n 1� /m!i iiiaS � �Z a 11 t t • • • wry n� • EI'II"_'fl"'�1•'yj MINIM PA �.olix dnrd •e rQw 4Bd/tiN�pP rp Owl 4FLt /ON AA �� �j NORTH CITY OF ITEa1rI: RANCHO CUCAMO%tiTGA TITLE =fa<tt �>Lt PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: / � �} ' 61: `.- 8m NO. 88-52 ` { ` ' ' 4 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No,. 12171 WHER-AS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12171, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Thomas Stephenson, applicant, for the purpose of subdi- vid-ng the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State Of California, described z,-4a-custom lot subdivision on 3.3 acres of land in-the R-1-20,000 zone, located at the northwest corner of Whirl:*!ay Street and Klusman Avenue - APN 1061-511- 06 and 07 into 6 lots,'regularly came befor,e the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on May 26, 198�,* and Divisions reports; and —~~, the ^.y Planner m� approval #e Map ~` set forth in the Engineering and Planning . ~ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the evidence presented -- Planning. reports has v»r�u �wz � qx s�ered other ' preswntem nt the public hear ng^ Cucamonga MUW. THEREFORE, thelP1aoning Commission of the CIty of Rancho in �reoa,d lhe Planning Commission makes the following findings ^" .=./`u" ve /rucrwu' 12171 and the Map thereof, (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable 'interim and proposed general `and specific plans; (b) The design or Yw � p tentative tr�,t is consistent --— with all applicable `vrcnm and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The s �te � ' s oh�s�udlysuitable for the tYpe ofde- xa,opment proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentatIve tract 1snot likely to cause ser�� public oea/thprobems� � '-- (F) The design of � with any easement _ within the proposed subdivision. record, for access through or use of the property ` O ' ' o ' � -�� A Resolution iao. 82 -52 Page 2 C (g) That this project will not create a'iverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12171, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approc3d subject to all of the following conditions and the attached StandLYd Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The required setbacks as shown on the Tentative Tract Map sha'iT.be shown on the recorded Final. Tract Map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 17 , . „ /. 0. I, JACK LAN, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify thjt the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of hiay, 1982, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, Stout, King, Sceranka, Tolstoy NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None 1� ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 10 E � :JR y c � _ O C n L r J n S 3 J G R A O n O N r.A wC O, O C m iwn .. n' • R r o- o -t �. °O n I R's A� •,. N G � d w N� ? � C w ?; 6 n L ^ N E;; n C �• 3 n > .Y -r > ^ v>. ar^ a a•oo n �o �`+ � ....N rb N �` �A(^'J a3� O� �p � S •- .n OOIb P3 b^ �� F n.N. �n J � N > ~= �. $ °� A-ric •r'"' s��. i^, �°_. A� am R4. b n nN w r`P• N O0. `*.^.n .>Y ..• • .00. Y nom' ^ .Oi. ~¢ � m V a-. n n � Y r n n9 O >.N ° bu +. • ±w . O. ° •C A N r° >° >5 �A- nN = < r r6a nn n w b R w d Z 13 S .p m•O 4 O �� b �� ° • • , IV I� I� �L\ K 1 �N I I I ti ti I I ` 1 I ` � �� r < bw Y a A A 1 ~S h� O @ r. N • d S A O•d w w w hm .° b Q. V O� VI ►• d R N s ON nu.Ad Y3 L~ _ Y t6nn e c, i b •vc nn n » n W. a` _n �d °� °tea +• a> 7mn » :. "`w.n o, o.c a'�es. znu `'c'- ,� -In => n ma` ^Q` •c �^ °�• �a tz �� °w m� '04 • >w ° sy HE +t^i bs ~I" x ^ �-. w »'n +a m.o '°•'S .l n nw ... ° n nm' Sao u n °9 •,t> n »a° >•.-n` ° m..z < u o� n '� cr. �. _`b. n .°i - v 15: 1 m 4 •r.,6 scy 'OI =• °s "P S�� no r. i -, �3 n O qi s Z $ N n'N % a n �. R �cn 3 0 °aw � r. r O �°• 3 aNyT N n oa; ;, o n.e.a .. ^.anm m Ir N:+��n•' n Qo r -n` o a'• d r N o zt inv a` n io �'�mr^a °_,c >m ». 'i°c o° o•- ��� 7F mo,. vn 't cn FF ID i, 6wo 9N9 z b+m o... �,�. i n .ms - oia wp n. m�N'" �' y v •°•4 fi ' � srr OYO O�` d. 1 O �Q n N Y.w�^ � I^i• Sm � y `•q �>•n ^. =u _ atit an °a �° o � �r� R.. n° n .>... �` o' ry w n n .Y, 3a� G nnn y y .ter •' wG v n cv aR 1 .^.' a.. cu _c +•w ^ w3^°, Ivs M rg 0 N �> • 0 4 O O = S q 7 N •` ?" fN 4_l . Q N , a � F. n? _•" oy ni�•�oV°.— "re non b �OG+CJ� di0 °blin ^6 ION• ly >t»n=ri S � b » »dN �J•�M •10 NrYI pM �• 4^ bs dnwGA ^Ii �n = NO» jG. -3. j ` _ M1 iwv- ti1> Cpy '• C 'Wh »i 7� »� $. at n 6v n S. nlo� ° ^ ° r Elf N �Z OIC> nA G >ardj S°• + �3 =e>i .fit 1p N �9 ° r^" � a iii • N + W O +K ire Z:�1 0n I d lQ Iu lo N7 ^O ap • $`•wn •c >» A`G'O a» d0 -Z y A b j N N O c ^ Z Q N r. <N > ° ,•• C A M1 rn N Z» N nc ]O 33gq q r�� d vCP i0. q j° • S 4 n» b '•fiN�N r + � 'A �» 0 ° A » tc Y O r rf1 a M1v O� + nn C.d naaMw. .ry" q. -NAr M1^n y. a d a�.q_ azs a' d• 90u p � 7r A O �'�. >•G NI • H irr •11. 0110 ^ o•A e°»I Anna irPVnvP.'On.°O 1 � UK ly �f1y "'• v,; ° < is N� i q •r0 =nn' •e' AT n ^: e' f'OOV IG O n >p °y nj�• M n O »3 IN K( I k+ lQ Iu lo I I I • � — j�'S �A •w. v N C O» b n� m �i °a A, � Q N r. <N > ° ,•• C A n � r �� �• Y M1 rn N Z» y� —N? nc O n r�� d vCP i0. q j° • a q d .° �� d >r ° N � l R� d r rf1 + a i bad O� + nn C.d n... �• _• ° 1'O O GI P ..•M1 o d ='ICP' n q w y. a d a�.q_ azs a' _ 6 G7 M1>' 7r A O NCO ��>^. a +11p NI • H irr •11. 0110 ^ o•A e°»I Anna p ^\^. finis. � ° c o d gc r v,; ° < is N� v nnn• � i o 03, � OQ V 0 ..P M1n �n PN ^: e' ^ •^•. 1 w N 0? A M n O � y r o n^ M1 ^° oan rr nr� vwu r w -?n ni w ° N; ^ �• .rrn 4 G o p2 +3 a �^ ol 1 r •~o N ASS ° A O M1 �a g o gg w » 0 > r T3. Cad 4 vo o ooll•-1 _ _ n M N S r •C O S � b G M1O ° O ° � 01 P Ii F M1 ° O ° a � i� nw e a C -1a- I k+ lQ Iu — �A ~ Y an C �• ' �s-� CA nNn c.11S b •� _ po �n azs a' P. G7 M1>' 7r A O NCO ��>^. a +11p NI • H irr •11. 0110 ^ w •i y >..N w.N 01 n an i 1�. A n O» i w SN M �j n G C Y O C P •M A a � O C � 6 •' 00 � nnn. a A r f A �kkkKR • � Y N • IN r q O C O n^ ? y d 0 ry A gm« �� a ay — Yq by » as 7n " mS NA p O NC ru ve � •e'a� r •° . . a. a i e^i i9< �. ^S�r w do �: °—' B 1 "SU°i �:fl 6n 1p AP.f1..N N69V bA0 I a• ' I 4G raj p; 1 3 G A.3 fffJJJ �q �C�i J T ( O G �'�. 6 rC N mr DS q. O 9 '•00 a ill q' s r..• ie 6 C •'J �� °erjj N�. � 11 �N c.p FOrV d.SCO" n� e eC "1 q AO �� N y O A n 06C � ° 10 nron � .O ie.w� N.wA N. 4 z .a an N �w ''vim rn� � bG 3S w u =L3i Bo G Z— " j n •Y w �7 ZA • 3 0 r s P 3 w ^ M1T nu L�O r J. nn� 11 C1,G ?yC'r > y r n q w ?. R E n� r f A �kkkKR • � Y N • IN r q O C O n^ ? y d 0 ry A gm« �� a ay — Yq by » as 7n " mS NA p O NC ru ve � •e'a� r •° . . a. a i e 'R k 1 N b 0 I a• ' I 4G raj p; 1 3 G A.3 fffJJJ �q �C�i J T ( O G �'�. 6 rC N mr DS q. O 9 '•00 O} -•� w I o i q' s r..• ie BOA na ( w ;U n o �' �1f1 o e eC "1 q AO �� N y O A n 06C � ° 10 Y w LL] � .O ie.w� N.wA N. N � '.`.. NeFi an N �w ''vim s d n nl rn � ` •"1S^ q. O H � n 1 �M AN l S •°'.d A A N Ow y S °. b.n..r A NY as +� O` � 6 — r d a� ° '• �•CN • 1. �. b w q r= .`_..X P ,v � ne d e 'R k I kI l LLy �� 1 °.Y °n D O} -•� w I o i q' s r..• ie BOA na ( w ;U n o �' �1f1 o e eC "1 q AO �� N y O A n 06C � ° 10 Y w LL] C� A O q d• ° ie.w� N.wA N. N � '.`.. NeFi an �w ''vim s d n nl rn � ` •"1S^ q. O H � n 1 �M AN l S •°'.d A A N Ow y S °. b.n..r A NY r I IR rm gelgi 'I' 1'� _ R. �1 o 9 6y .`_..X P ,v � ne d •• N naN dvn �i N•• l6 p6 n° 1 Q' bA` • Q�' N8 .r C • �� ..y y n 3 S q'C — a Cr •P..w o PP q r W c T = i a' C9 M n s_ b � 6 on` 3 .L �6 6 � m, a au �cP nn ^n � u o a S� m 6C b� T 6 aaa a M 6 6 I o � nn � e =� n� d q s = b j oCR 7 j> � 9 O 10 xn u° c. ° G� w n n I I i N • Y R � � n 7 end ro h;N n.n. b �A e °d o O.n e oaM Litt- k • �p n n' n b c 6 6 g 6 b 1 n• a-- = j 'N n aa, Egg M � b 0 •• 1 s r m o P nnm a 1 O ° as w ~ 9 n � n° M A a � a". N r � • y a Qa 9 6 = q R R < r ? m a m N P � m > T � Y O " r N 1 = n ro c N n r 6 0 C � -• 1 ^ 9� v �•P Y A�� �OnR 3 ^OC_ d S 4.�1t = = 1 1.�0 •[C6 � � 00 � •L.Gi �°n awr. ^ ~ d m min <_6ip tZ nw.� b ^V ago au L ANA^ ��• ^ bRl n nnp Nn d d d�V., n- .•blob RO rm r 6T3P u''n .. »^ ru Ta•.° pnm• � � ^P nn '3n`c Rwz� � 62RO • t� ^ j N 79 .^. 6Y..•. N '• � R . AL: b a M � b 0 •• 1 s r m o P nnm a 1 O ° as w ~ 9 n � n° M A a � a". N r � • y a Qa 9 6 = q R R < r ? m a m N P � m > T � Y O " r N 1 = n ro c N n li O 6 Iw a n m a 3 z M1 60 am n r §� b w ao R O a � G b.^Sa a C6 Hb r O On° 14 +6 da °^ M A O G� n m Y n o' a � , O t43?r O.TM: H ^?'.,< { { °YQ` ao �. x•16 °. ^qua o a a ao Lg.ra a•a�a�. 7 _ T ° ao R�a °° yT LZ a`°; my^�" Cl33 6P�T1ann '� b j�- n' l� G •C S 9 o. o'o+.v r� ate°° •R^c n'N� 0 A P G° t, •G op v� 1 �. �, O g O R R y �p ° •O oS�p. 1b9 N n m SM1r � o'6.r t =mod fair, 1 31 •. 90... Ob9��. �p Z w O 6 Iw a n m a 3 z M1 60 am n r §� b w ao R O a � G b.^Sa a C6 Hb r O On° 14 +6 da °^ M A O G� n m Y n o' a � , O t43?r O.TM: H ^?'.,< { { °YQ` ao �. x•16 °. ^qua o a a ao Lg.ra a•a�a�. 7 _ T ° ao R�a °° yT LZ a`°; my^�" Cl33 6P�T1ann '� b j�- n' l� G •C S 9 o. o'o+.v r� ate°° •R^c n'N� 0 A P G° t, •G op v� 1 �. �, O g O R R y �p ° •O oS�p. 1b9 N n m SM1r � o'6.r t =mod fair, 1 31 •. 90... Ob9��. �p Z �• h L • ' N N 111W_ M wn.r Ya. Na n•coca 9 ?nb �b TN r6t,� _ p e -- Z °m a LC O4 m°1 n O�O nnaa All gM i A ON N6 o,,�a °O�N nn yS � ea P m �dm.,,My y T so��i• nna e P � an C 4•�° s�9 •`6 °°' "°? 3... R" "9 °p y.O° o.°i •. o'er. e",i� �a� 0o SO o,a^ o' �N d S6 g M1 d •Z .nnR Sa'' gaeb 'mm °gin n a,�c° ~9 � - •a'c'e wo °, aNu ce �oocaa aOi "' , a vas °n +oR �3m•a. •� ^ ~,., on R ES p � r 3 3< r. � •1q O G S 4.�1t = = 1 1.�0 •[C6 � � 00 � •L.Gi �°n awr. ^ ^ e d m min <_6ip tZ nw.� b boa a ago au L L; "m or°� �an =.nib n �. SV= 6 a q4 � aP.. »^ ru gM i A ON N6 o,,�a °O�N nn yS � ea P m �dm.,,My y T so��i• nna e P � an C 4•�° s�9 •`6 °°' "°? 3... R" "9 °p y.O° o.°i •. o'er. e",i� �a� 0o SO o,a^ o' �N d S6 g M1 d •Z .nnR Sa'' gaeb 'mm °gin n a,�c° ~9 � - •a'c'e wo °, aNu ce �oocaa aOi "' , a vas °n +oR �3m•a. •� ^ ~,., on R ES p � r 3 3< r. � •1q O G C Uzi > yV O R 4u °[ h',CI'� g1fi iii �M �p�p ��. .n 4ti�n -•> N � � > y/'fi `yb� AN ..3 O` W O. > O �qM R t•.6T y. 1ir0>p ^y N �• W P3 �h a.��N R. .� a Rtl >� �wb nn oo v �:. �•�..n o.,:�_•• n � n .. '� or3^ � ^ hF +Y� �f 3 w na�rn ��nC r _ O 'yhy cu �, °w ° y4 dfiA • w -°. r�pp °'a- W.+ p '<.. �.'• > Y. <°. o. O� r ".tea n 'n � °a .°.,� Q a'» ns� �cwr°a �N' N ch o• f w .w. w ell .... 'Y Ana " "'nR M ..o ;'\ a •• �'.° =_°, ery7> '. Cl' ca. (D (D fD ^ n o L1 Z to P q� 3 ,a a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF Tri'S RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSIOM APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12171. WHEREAS, a request has been Filed for a time extension for tie above - described project pursuan.t,to Section 17.02.090; and, i; WHEREAS, the Planning Commissi,i; . conditionally approved the above t descried Tentative Tract. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission 'as made '.e following findings: A. The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial compliance with the City's currant General Plan, Specific F'.ans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies; td, B. The extension of the Tentative yap wilt not cause significant inconsistencies oith the cu,rent General Plan, Specific glans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies; and, �. The extension of the lontati%a Map is not likely to cause public health ara safety problems; and, t D. The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance. i SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: E Tract IRLLcant Expiration 12171 S "ephenson May 14, 1987 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAN OF MAY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Lennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: _ �Bra uller, Deputy ecretary 1� �5 `, .. :<1 ,_.;VNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Page t I, Brad Buller, Deputy Sek:retary of the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, ,passed, and adopted by the Planniog Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plannikig Commission held o!. the 14th day of Mpy, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NGES� COMMISSIONERS: F ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS { i ' I E k t F i h. i A r 1 12 I i 01 I DATE: TO: FROM: aY W I ECT: — CITE 0'' RANCHO CUCAMONGA TI AFF REPORT 0 GC7 F 0 c. -n O O E Z U > May 14, 1986 Ir 1 Chairman an:'titemhers of the Planninq Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Rubin Yu, Associate Planner PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR A JUNIOR .HIGii SCHOOL SITE IN.. TERRA VIS7 I. ABSTRACT: 'his report provides general information about a proposed junior high school site in the Terra Vista Planned Community. The Commission wily be asked to make reeommecdations to t�= Central School District. II. BACKGROUND: On AFril 23, 1986, the Central School District Tff',a—r-m-eT—tTie City of its intent to acquire a junior hic!i school site in Terra Vista (between Tentat've Tracts No. 12672 end 12673). State law (Educatior, Code Section 39004) requires School Districts to notify the City Planning Commission before acquiring property for a new school site. The City does riot have jurisdiction over 'ap?rovai or genial of the site selection. However, the .ity Planning Commission is authorized to _:ubmat recoiremendations to the School District for their cc.isideration. Such recommendations must be made within thirV (30) rays. Followirg rece�pt of the Cit_v's recomnendat;ion, the final decision on the acquisition is made by the governing board of •che School District. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The subject site consists of approximately 15.1 acres locaWe near the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway ard Spruce Avenue in Terra Vista Planned Community (see Exhibit A). The property is designated as a junior high school site by the Terra Vista Planned Community Text. The site is vacant and slopes gently to Lhe souti. at approximately 2% to 3 %. There is no vegetation on the site IV. ISSUES!AvaLYSIS: The props ed school site appears to be adequate in sizeze snd centrally 1Lv,sta.d in its service ,rea. The si e together with the adjacent ji,-,rk serve as the focus point of t):% neighborhood. The propraed joint use of nark and school facilf iris throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community a,. !ars to be a srdnd concr°ot and economical in lard use. Furthermore, the school site will Aso be accessible to the students and local reAdents through ITEM F PLANNING. COWAISSION STAFF REPORT May 14, 1986 Terra Vista Jr. High School Site Page 2 3 :trail system separated from automobile traffic. Although the School District is planning to acquire the subject site, the actua, acquisition may take place a few years fram now pending availability of funding. The School District has indicated that it is very likely t".q District will build and take occupancy of the school buildings L�;:fore the property is acquired, possibly through a lease with ttie.pronerty owner ('Lewis Homes). But, this Is not expected to take place within the next two (2) years. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Commission review the proposa and--direct Staff to forward appropriate conmetits to the cent al School District. Should the District proce,_u with the acquisition and /or placement of temporary buildings, the Commission should request that the City be giver. the opportunity to review aed comment on the site plan,-, architectural design and off -site improvements to assure compatibility with surrounding development and improvement standards. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City 'Planner BB-RY:das IF i i; .3\ m ao/ Im / \ \ � . ; .. ze \ \ C; cl � .>. . � � \� \�� � �: �22.� |� s Egg \ §§ . ./| § |&c2d§� |§ |§2 (� ze \ \ C; cl � .>. . � � \� \�� � �: ADMINISTRATION. Frank Cosca, Ir. Ed.D. Central School i s t r i c t District Superintendent (fie Thomas W. Garnella, Ed.D. Assistant Superintendent. Business Se 4457 Foothill Blvd„ Rancho Cucamonga, California 91i30 1 (714) 989 -8541 CIT", A F RgNCMO 0 c n, �►NNiryr, pt SOG�nrapA April 21, 1986 AM APB 23 1986 71g�yJlUJ1i�JZJ�t3J4l� 8 Dan Coleman, Senior Planner Planning Cgmmission City o: Rancho cncamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Mr. Coleman: The Central School District wishes to notify the Planning Commission that it plans to operate and acquire a new ju -nior high school in the Terra Vista Planned Community. A copy c+f the legal description for the junior high school site is enclosed. As you know, under Ed. Code 39004 we are rE3uired to notify you of our intent. + I have included a copy of the Coda. Wa would appreciate the commissian's. I� investigation and subsecpient report within the prescribed period. f If you have any gc:csti ;ins, please don't hesitate to call me at 984 -8541. Thanks !I for your help.. Sincerely, Thomas W. Garnella, Ed. D. Assistant Superintendent, Buslness Services j7 c: Anthony Palmisano, Syolfr/ Lang /ChrisCopher Architects,lnc. Kay Matlock, Lewis Homes ' BOARD. OF TRUSTEES ^� Ruth A. Mutter Ilenty G Stoy Richard Alexander Debbie Sokar Joyce G. Bergson Preatent Clerk Member v= Membji Member y. ; K E. 6. LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A• 4Y . JR. HIGH SCHOOL SITE. SOUTH. OF TENTATIVE TRACT 110. 12672 1 'TCAT PWtTION.OF SECTION 1, TOWNSF:P 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN 2 BzRNARDTV.7 MERIDIAN.. IN THE CITY OF RANCHO.CUCANONGA,.. COUNTY OP 3 'SAN BERNARDINO, SPATE OF CALIFORNIA. AS SHOWN ON C.ECORD Dr-SURVEY 41 RECORDED IN BOOK 32, PAGE 72, . IN THE OFFI^E OF THE COUNTY RECJRU)£ �w ' "1F SAID COUNY.1 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 5 ,. 6 BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SPROCB AVENUE g AVAD THE CEIMERLLNE OF muUNTAIF VIEW DRIVE; TxS'dCE ALONG THE 0 fi ^ ?- °^ytNE OF SPRVCE AVENUE SOUTH 3 "04 %18" WEST 95.00 FEET TO 10 -CHE ,RUE °OINT OF BEGINNINGt THENCE SOUTH 3 "04 -181 EAST 118.49 S1 -FEET TO .A TANGENT CgMZ CONCAVE EASTERLY, RAVC:iIs A RADIUS ..;F -2 1000.00 FEET. THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROT16 A CENTRAL 13 ANGLE OF 3.30'38" AN ARC LENGTH fF 63.60 FS-11T TO A POINT,. A RADIAL ' 14 i LINE OF SAID CURVE TO SAID POINT BEARS -SOUTH 89'25.40` WEST; ]j THENCE LEAVING SAM CENTERLINE AND SAID CURVE SOUTH 89 °25`40" 16 WEST 406.70 TzET; TO A POINT IN TIM ?IO.ST EASTERLY BOU?XJARY LINE .'.17 OF TENTATIVE' TRACT 126731 THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE NORTH ly.. 18 13-04-06- VEST 23.40 FEETa rq"lENCE.truRTH 62.12120° WEST 840.04 19 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGRT -OF -NAY i.IZT OF TERRA 20 VISTA PARXHAY; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY .SHE :101414 28.57'34" 21 EAST -7.84 FEET 1b A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING 22 A RADIUS OF 1556.J0 FEET. THENCFJMITBEASTERL;R ALONG SAID CUMu- 23 THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23-59129- AN Anc LNCfx or 651.54 FE..T, 24 TO A POINT., SAID POINT BEING THE YOST WESTERLR CORNER OF TZMATIt { 'j�u TRACT 12672:A RADIAL LIRE. OF SAID CURVE TO SAID POINT HEARS NORTH` 26 37.02'57" WEST. THENCE = .VTNG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE AND SAID 27 CURVE .ALONG THE SOUTi'BRLY BOUNDARY LINE OF TV,.TATIVE TACT 12672 29t�. SOUTH 37 ^02157" EAST 289.99 FEEIt TR£NCE SOUTH 64- SS'42" EAST t 29 210.00 FEE[; TRENC= SOUTH 36 "SS'42" EIS7 321.00 FEET TO A.POINT .t11,1 ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF -WAY :SHE OF LPRUCE AVENUE; THENCE L£AVINr� It 111111 .� LEGAL DESCRIPTION - JR; RIGR SCHOOL SITS SOUTH. OF TENTATIVE TRACT 12672 (COST.) 1 THENCE LEAVI4G SAID WESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY =;F', SOUTH 86.55142' 2 EAST -44.00 FEET TO- A, POINT ON TIM - CEiiTERLI:.'E OF SPRUCE .AVENUE, 3 SAIO POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BBGI:HiING. 5 SAID PARCEL. COt1TAI4S 55,14 ACRES. - 6 PREPARED BY HMOLE AM ASSOCIATES, INC. OF SAN 2ERNARDINO COUNTY 7 J.ti. 126 -5445 i 9 6 -13 -85 } 9 GHIMSC 10 . 11 12 13 t 14 1 IS 16 1 S 1s ! 19 20 21 i 23 24 26 27 Ej 41 i y, •! PEA r 7Ehrn7"/V J r A" m ;l 'a / PRO! -�eD JIS. %I /GH 3chff?OG S /TB g, sl 131, 0�7 {' `•8 "MOM 7b& r, se9•sr?o'a'Rlwc. v.. v a r 2179 CALIFORNIA EI)LICATIO.14 CODE § 39003. Financing of Reconstruction of Particular School Building The reconstruction of any school on -all or a portion of a site whicL as been used for public school purposes uninterruptedly since prior to 1890 may be financed through the State School Building Aid and Earthquake Reconstruction and Replacement Bond Law of 1972 (Chapter 19 (commencing with Section 17400) of Part ;10 of Division I of Title 1), if the legal title to such site or a portiun thereof is held either by: (a) a city school district, or (b) a charter city, and a city school district has obtained or is in the process of obtaining a lease of not less than 50, years on such site or portion thereof from the charter city. § 39004. investigation and Report of Planning Commission Befo-P Acquisition To promote the safety of pupils and comprehensive commu- nity planning the governing board of e-ch school district before acquiring title to pmpei Iv for a new school site or for an addition to a present school site, wall give the planning commission hav- ing jurisdiction notice in writing of the proposed acquisition. The planning commission sha-11;nvestigate the proposed site and within 30 d-,N) s after receipt of the notice shall submit to the governing bd',wd a written report of the investigation and its rec- ommendationb; concerning acquisition of the site. The governing board sha!! not acquire title to the t�roperty until the report of the planning commission has been rt'(.eivej. if the report does not favor the acquisition of the property for a school sit-a-, or for an addition to a present school site, the governing board of the school district shall not acquire title to the property until 30 days after the commission's report is re- ceived. § 39005. investigation of Site Near Airport To promote the safety of pupils, comprehensive community planning, and greater eaucational usefulness of school sites, the governing board of each school district, including districts gov- erned by a city board of education if the proposed site is within two miles, measured by airline, of tha =point on an airport boundary which is nearest the site and excluding them if the property is not so located, before acquiring title to property for a new schon: site or for an addition bz4a present site, shall give a EM �U lw tr -- CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAIXONGA STAFIFREPORT t�,� � Z1CAJ%f.0 A t .M DATE: May 14, 1986 ivn _ I TO: Chairman and;Members of the Planning Commission FROM: '.,ad Buller, City Planner BY Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Ak -" TENTATIVE TRACT 12991 H L dR—,N-* U - A residential subdivision and Design Review o sin e`family lots 8.9 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential District, located at the south fide of Lemon Avenue, 500± east of Archibald Avenue , AW 201- 252 -21, 22. (Continued from April 23, 1986 meeting'.) I. BACKGROUND: At its Fpril 23, 1986 meeting, the Planning Commission continued this project to this regular meeting as requested by the applicant. The developer is . again requesting continuation. Revised development plans have been submitted and are scheduled for May 20th and May 22nd Technical Review Committee and Design Review Committee review, respectively. Attached for you review is a copy of the letter of regoest from the applicant. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this item be continued to the June th regular Planning Commission meeting. R ctfull ubm- d, Brad Bu lar City Planner BB:NF:ko Attachments: Letter of Continuance from Applicalit b 'ITEM G f: exxELBURN& April. 22, 1985 Chairman of the Planting Commission and Planting Commission Members City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California 93730 Re: Request for Continuation of Planning Commission hearing Gentlemen: We have made substantial revisions to our plans for Tract 12991 on Lemony Street east of Archibald to accomodate suggestions made by the Planning end Engineering Divisions of the City. These plans are now being reviewed by appropriate committees and we anticipate no problem in resolving any minor technical issues which may arise. Accordingly, we wrnl3 appreciate q" continuation of the Planning CO.•nmission hearing until auch' time that the hearing is rescheduled by the Planning Division. Thank you for Your consideration and continuing inter..at. Yours very truly, Allen W. Parrin -- RECEIVED -- C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PMNINQ QlViSION. AM MAY 81.086 t�►�3�t�1�121�1`�1S fi . , ri 6 e '7evsiaprr0nt COrporatkin SSW Atessane 0 Ek9Aeve^cl .divers de. CaSmrr is a2soe t?14) � 1 r El E V .r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST.ASF REPORT DATE: May 14. :986 TO :. Chairirv.n and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Laura Psomas, Landscare Designer SUBJECT: 19TH STREET AND BASE LINE ROAD BEAUTIFICATION GLG4,Hp>�� 1 9 Cat A„ q C$ .en Presented for Commission review are the proposed landscape design treatments for portions of both 19th Street and Base Line, Road. Beautification of 19th Strret is proposed for selected parkwall areas between Sapphire Street to the west and F!_;mosa Avenue to thn east. Base Line beautification will target primarily those parkways which are bare between Hellman Avenue to the east and Marine Avenue to the', west. DESIGN In the more extensive 19th Street beautification, the typical condition being treated is the concrete parkway adjacent the "back -up" residential wall situation. As 19th S*:reet is part of State Route 30, parkway design is dictated by rigid Caltrans requirements concernia'►g sight line distances and tree girths~ The proposed design respects these requirements by using low flowering grQ ad covers where re -tired and combining them wita Crepe Myrtle trees (Lagerstroemia ,fiidiCL. ..aic Mayten trees (Maytenus boaria) where permitted. Sidewalks will "jog" to give a meandering quality. Base Line Road is the smaller of the two projects, primaril;; focused on filling in bare parkwa! The suggested street trees are the Sweet Gum (Liquidambar styracifia) and the Red ironbark (Eucalytpus sideroxylon) which will strengthen the street image as they area already extensively used along Base Line Road. Cr;crful shruLs, ground ,:over, and vines will similarly reinforce existing parkway landscaping. The construction cost projection for -19th Street Beautification is $244,150. Vase Line Road Beautification is projected, to cost $91,487. Both projects are to be funded with beautification funds. Bidding on beautification project construction documents will likely occur two (2) months after 'Council approval. ITEM H PLANNIMG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 19ti, Street & Base Line Road Beautrrrir7tion May 14 1986 Page r ..- R7COMMENDATION: Staff reco�n -nds that the Planning Commission review annc approve die beautification concepts fc,• brth 19th Street and Base Line Road, and recommend approval to the City Council. Veqtfully submi,lted, s r LBH:LP:jr Attachments Em 21 an 0701-02 o 5 -14 -86 P.C. Agenda Packet o Page 3 of BASELINE ROAD I 197H TYPICAL LANDSCAPE TREATMENTS :... a U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT { U���> l9ii � DATE: May 14, 1986 TO: :hairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Plann er BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13114 - CHU� LiZ - A 21 custom lot subdivision on 3.6 acres of land in the Low Residential District, located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle Del Prado - APN: 208 - 921. -03 and 04. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Ten ive Tract 13114 and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 3.8 du /ac. C. Surrounding Land _Use and Zoning: North - Single Family Residential, Low Residential. South - 'Single Family Residential, Low Residential. East Single Family Residential, Low Residential. West Red Hill Basin Park (under construction), Open Space. D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential. North - .ow Residential. South - Low Residential. East - Low Residential. West Parks Public Facilities. E. Site Characteristics: The project site is vacant and surrounded by single- family residential uses. The site slopes significantly to the southwest. At the southeast area of the project site, the grade elevations are approximately 20 to 30 feet higher than the property to the adjacent south. Although the site is not located within the Hillside Residential District, it does contain some significant grade changes, which effect the proposed development. The total north to south grade change is on the order of 50 to 55 feet. Adjacent to the .north project boundary is a substandard width public street (Calle Del Prado, cul -de -sac). ITEM I ,y I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 13114-- Schultz May 14, 1986 Page 2 II. BACKGROUND: On April 23, 1986, the Planning Commission contirae:i Tract 3 =4 to allow staff additional time to work with the applicant in preparing the necessary information needed for i Tentative Tract 13114 review. III. ANALYSIS: The applicant has further developed a revised grading f plan for Tentative Tract 13114. This plan indicates a reduction in the quantity of grading ?nd disturbed surface area in an attempt to address the Commission's grading concerns and direction. It appears that the most critical lots of concern are Lots 4 thru 8, and 14 thru 17. The applicant has prepared a conceptual grading plan using a stepped building pad technique in order to reduce grade cuts and fill on the north ar..i south lots respectively see Exhibit "D "). This technique allows ease of driveway access into a garage from the pro,)osed street and gives a development appearance F to the extent prai tical) conforming to the natural grade. This grading concept is designed to accommodate privat,t useable open space in the form of decks, patios, balconies or somt other similar form of built structure designed to fit the nattral topography rather than graded level yard area. Since the applicant is only requesting approval of the Tentative Tract, and is not prepared to submit a complete development /design review package, staff recommends that the following condition be imposed on the approval of Tentative Tract 13114. A total development /design review submittal, including a grading plan, building placement, building elevations, and building colors and material samples for the entire sub- division shall be submitted to, reviewed, and approved by the Planning Commissic prior to recordation of the final map. This condition will ensure that the grading and unit development of this tract will be responsive to the natural topography of the site. This condition also prohibits individual lot -by -lot grading. ` It is staff's opinion that the proposed conceptual grading plan for Tentative Tract 1311A.' with the condition noted above, reflects the City's policy of mini„ al grading and appropriately illustrates the concept of stepped building pads. IV. RECOMMENDA41ON: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract 13114 per the attached Resolution and Coiditions of Approval, and issue a Negative Declaration for the project. • N PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 13114 - Schulty May 14, 1985 Page 3 Raspectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DP :cv r Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Exhibit "E" - Grading Section GG Parkway Detail Section, Call Del Pr'ado k Environmental Assessment Resolution with Conditions of Approval Standard Conditions of Approval i F 6 -►--3 N 9 i II (� •ty. 3Jg3/ • �o V gnRw s S3� 01 3Y AMIY1 aw ixn V .tw.w 11Y30 b Wav gi o J — d 3 4 t r. T 133Y1i !2" < miuw a{ t S = r 133Y1t � •' � �v 371p3/q— �YO]Y12 31rs� o z a _ W 3arla� lei F/ti�. Cr >SY'71.3x1r W I m � ate I t` AYV�M W O Su xxrd nuwsxnwao �vla3w s I I a3sodsoYa I 001%, Mvu .. i-till 7) MOT _j <9s; ii � .•'Tie }.- � �� ;± i ISM y• � t czi! i �;; tli3 ;is Sr f � xV Jy 3 'ilQS J.3lf8L �, YR PT. <<WOfY�.ZY1? 't!Cd � �y :J if d T�— a 3s p: _ •t .jib •gt31! CL ¢e: 3 i 3� 11111M =Paa iil tfis i s! i•i PIN ill b_v; ASIIT� � F z�trz •rt•K E- g •ans ,;wan auvxarrr� ss�ro� �� •NOa', �' i ►-� xvusr anv ! r ' � ,l ✓ ^ � / / i f A � 1 ! jCy \'� � L. S� ej Op Ao •. .t F Iii d w i . ,r � � , � ':i ' •yam ' /�\' � � � W/o i t. s� arfl/ n I Of 211, -- J a: -e-e T 1 N T � G u v r i ei I• „ � a� h CT .a I , LA I � J Cn r � L LL]�r 0 7 U� �O U � 0 z U� LA I'� f S+� or lu r � F a e U a p� 0 s s z ` O � 0 ; k.. f WALL 1 i 7,'l C)L OM 4 L•ANflSCAPtr1y "�t D�lfLli� k j M1'4 =q SEC" 14H" La I UffrH CITY OF ITE, @�I• _ r i� r 3 ��� RANCHO CUCAMOiNGA TiTIF_: �A�kwax 1rIR�� ��eTii�t�t PLANNING DItIISIi N E;'FiIQIT =_�E " ALE: WrC5_ k tic ro.Uc zG� t f �N�`�IRONb. �T�TTAL REVIEW APPLICATION o l ~� z _ -- > INITIAL SrTUDY - PART I GENERAL For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project apprication is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Play. ng Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission ;gill make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have na significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (31 An additional information report should he supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed• 7 2r- R' Project Title: 77F— , 14 , Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: W. M_�ttu� -r- _3 Jr. �._L♦\Gltt� A�11 =_ .�P�: !- tLY -Si.�. 9tY °� �SS..�B'38 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: _J.M,WtLSOtAactvrt_ 3S-7 u.5 = ��t�tA LLVE = -�SPt lat�►nG . 9r-tAr -14) yt�c zfiec Location of --j_ct: T4 ?7 VINLYA2n Avc ioe .,_ Assessor's Parcel No.: <>-, List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: i . f. i. j 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION f Proposed ise or proposed project:__T,,R�,� -t-� 5U8F.- ,v1ktoht > ►r, S.i1�1.G_LE EA��I..Y__TZt".cliw.. -ncc iCdSTa.ct to TSB M 'r Acreage of project area and square footage of existing at.! proposed buildings, if any: s, so e Describe the environmental setting of the project site including information on topography, soil stability, plants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary E sheets): T�.tE P� n,J�GT SlT✓c 1 �! •- � ••r aF 1iNY �S t�t= �,i •-i4EES 4 � ,S�.a� 4t�T4lW L «T OT L ° _._�A NI \LV Q C\ bEl�G =S TO THE �OQ 1 E.��'� i� 30�1T1 -1 `i'll� t?tcn� t .�' MM ty 'TY 9wott �S tTL lS t To T�1 ►�c-1- i Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact a - 110 I ^2 -T°10 f CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts,. statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Date: 7/24/RS Signature Title 1 -3 -T' ) WILL THIS PRO MM YES NO I. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for ounicipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? X S. Remove aay existing trees? How many? uaug 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosivese Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this''project will generate daily: too c_at:i F:,-2 p&q p.:fc2 Eo-r 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this » project: 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this +- project., in cubic yards: 2Q.A6ote V f 24 aeot C.Y F/ . 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page.. f CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts,. statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Date: 7/24/RS Signature Title 1 -3 -T' ) RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following ir,f'ormation should be provided to the City of Rancho CtWamonga Planning Division in order, to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are required V� secure 1- fitters from the school district for accommodating the increased number of s:udants to issuance prior of '`wilding permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location cf Project: A!F'92o7c, Ieco ��T '�o'F B.iS�►�, t PHP�E I', PHASF_2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of ginvle family units.• 21 2. Number of multiple family Lnits: 3. Date proposed to -� begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model and r# of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Ranee Lk', .. W. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART IT - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APPLICANT:��. FILING DATE: —LOG NUMBER: 7fJ i/ 12sllT /3//� PRCJECT: PROJECT LOCATION`S I. ENVIRONMNTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils. and Geologv. Will the proposal have significant results in: a, Unstably ground conditions or in changes in f: % geologic relationshipo? 'eruptions, displacemaats, compaction or al of the soil? Vf c. Cha:.ge in topography or ground surface J contour intervals? (/ d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ e. Any ?otential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? / rf. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g• Exp _rre of people or property to geologic hazardo such as earthquakes, landslides, mud - slidej, ground failure, or'similar hazards? h• An increase Tn the rate of extraction and /or _ use of any mineral. resource? Iydroloav- W :M the proposa,', have sig,ufice at rasa! *s in: Page YES u4YBE NO a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction 3f flowing streams, rivers, or epheaeral stream hannels? _ V b. Cha;iges in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and :amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course oz flow of flood waters? V d. Change in the amount Of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface Water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? V g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with - drawals, o:r through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? i / h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? I- Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as Flooding or seiches? 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile j or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable .air quality standards? C. Alteratiou of local or regional climatic s conditions, affecting air movement, moisture 1 or tewpesature? ✓ 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results In. u, a. Change in the char:- teristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number t of any species of plants? ,fit b• Redudt.: in 'mum c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposai'have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introductioa of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removai of existing fish or wildlife habitat? S. Population. Vill the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the locat::on, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand fLv addi tional housing? 6. Sacio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: , a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project co.--s be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax pavers or project users? 7. Land Use and Plannine Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planner: land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non- consumptive recreational opportunities? ?ace 3 YES v•rB S0 V --Z' � ase Y, YES YA 7-',` NO 3. Transportation, Will the proposal have significant results in: r a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? t C. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? f f d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? J e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? ,f f. Alterations to or effects on present and i potential water -borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? J g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? " 9. Cultural Resources s. Will the proposal have fi signicant results in: v a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors, 4Wiyll the proposal have significant results in: C a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health f hazard? _ b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous sutstances In the event of an accident? rj &. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? J` e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? o / g. The creation of objectionable odors? V h. An increase in light or glare? ... he ?a;e 5 YES '.r4Y3E NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the ;proposal heave significant results in: a. The obstruction or iegradation of any scenic vista y- view? b. The creati(,t of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities ind Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? p b,. Natural or packaged gas? V c. Communications systems? ✓ d. Water supply? V e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? V I g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? (' i. Police protection? [ J. Schools? J. `I k. Parks or other recreational facilities? J 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? y' m. Other governmental services? % 13. Enerey and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible r renewable sources of energy are available? J _ _ YES "4F?= No e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. Mandatory Findin— of Si _ ficance. a. Does the project hava the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or Wi,',dlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal: or eliminate Important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory'? J b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage off long -term, environmental goals? (A short -te,,m impact on the environment'is one which occurs In a relatively brig ". .definitive pAriod of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). f' c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed ` In connection with 'the effects of past projects, and probable future projects).. d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION nr EN(7IRO*,I*IE;ITAi, EVALUATIon ( , the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitilationemeasures). The desirn of the proposed project will cause a disruption and displacement of the prssject site soil, and change topography and ground surface contour inte -vals. These impacts may he mitigated to be acceptable by developing the foilcwing grading techniques: 1. Rear yard cross lot drainage, and 2. Shared use and maintenance of side yard slope banks. F These techniques would allow the lot pads to be lowered, subsequently reducing '¢ the height of rear yard slopes and in turn, reduce the overall amount of grading. ILI Al T ?aze 5 LE { i ?asa 7 IIL DET�3l:TS$' On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed.projecc COULD NOT.hati,..a significant effect on the environments and a SEGATIVT DECLaEATprN will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant „YY effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attzched sheet hive been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLAMT10:T 'WILL, BE ;PREPARED. EDI find the proposed project ;iAY hava significant effect on the envirnment, and an E3VTRO: mit nmp&T REPORT is ' ired. Date :7 OTitJ e e KI RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALL`,! APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13114 WHEREAS, Tentative Traci Map No. 13114 hereinafter "Map" submitted by W. M. Schultz, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of approximately 5.5 acres into 21 lots, regularly came before the P- Tanning Commission for public hearing and action on May 14, 1986; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recoomended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engipearirg and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evieence prec znted at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Ranr-Tu Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1; The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 13114 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Tentative Tract 13114 Page 2 (g) That this project, with the implementation of the Initial Study Part II mitigating measures, wil not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is-issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 13114, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. A total development /design review submittal, including a grading plan, buitding placement, building elevations, and building colors and materiE,l samples, for the entire subdivision shall be submitted to, reviewed, and approved by the Planning Commission prior to recordation 4f the final map. 2. The developr, 11hall be responsible to install and maintain the perimeter lan'scape parkway on Vineyard Avenue and Calle Del Prado Street prior to annexation into the City's Landscape Maintenance W strict. 3. A detailed mall plan for the north boundary line alcng Calle Del Prado Street shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits or prior to final map approval. 4. Slope banks five (5) feet or greater in vertical height ;Zd of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be at minimum, irrigated ad landscaped with appropriate groundcover for erosion rontrol by the developer, to the satisfaction of the City P. ?ginner and Building Official ,prior to release of the. grading bond. 5. Slope banks five (5) feet or greater in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped by the property owner, prior to occupancy,, and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15- gallon or larger size tree per each 150 square feet of slope area, one 1- gallon or larger size shrub for each 100 square feet of slope area, and appropriate roundcover. In addition, slope banks in excess of eight ?8) «c vertically, and of 2 :1 or greater slope, shall also include one 5- gallon or larger size tree per each 250 square feet of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this condition shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the property owner prior to occupancy. { AL , -a1 . tl Tentative Tract 13114 Page 3 Engineering: 1. Existing 12KV and telecommunication lines along the east side of Vineyard Avenue shall be undergrounded at the expense of the developer by either one of the two choices below. (Consideration shall be given to the telephone service line along the north side of Calle Del Prado. a) From the southerly tract boundary to the first utility pole north of the northerly tract boundary (approximately 165 feet); or b) From the southerly tract boundary to a new utiT,ity pole installed along Vineyard Avenue just nor};i of Calie Del Prado. 2. A private drainage easement for cross lot drainage shall be required for the southern tier of lots, and shall be delineated on the final map. 3. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated on the south side of Carle Del Prado. 4. The central cjZ-de -say: street shall be lowered as much as possible in the final, design ire order to provide the minimum possible elevation difference oetween the pads on the south side of the street and the existing homes to the south of the tract. Building and Safety 1. A rear building setback line on the south tier of lots that prohibit any construction within the "slope influence" line as produced from the top of rear yard slope that exists to the satisfaction of the Building Official, as recommended by the Soils Engineer and verified by a third' party review, and shall be delineated on the final map. 2. The final elevations of the pads on the south side of the central cul -de -sac street shall be as low as possible relative to the adjacent street elevations as controlled by acceptable driveway grades. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary . _, x }. Tentative Tract 13114 Page 4 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES; COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: -�3 I I k n� Z 6 4J U •O 1 G. 10 11 ET oo as ° uAya�..N..N,SC� cuov YpC �7ca�> p E u^ TN 9u 0y� p E =S Y ^ tY 6`Oy� C6 yV ^U"e" .� =dam G06 C ^Ny ^ A a V `cam,N doA N,n'A'_a r rn'�Y° c o ey° '%,a&5 svr d q ^ ^ c Oydt T^ 'O� A AaA Fb8 a� CC @Q p 41 y C.°..O Aa VO wY yyC '�y NN t1EO @yC@pL °pY .EGUY� Y BNd O U ^44 aA p1. O ";d= 3y6 Y om` us as= ^o �N r .-LNUd s�umo:oaN�ni� o -.zooan v m H Z J O O N ~ Z V G¢I 9 6 H f y� N 6 O � H V � O ^WJ J U!U H � j Q Ems^ Ng C TN UU° 11 nu z w. �. �YU6`i NO�tiY Qp.�G A^ p�eEr lu •E u 9�u�Y 04O't u CN VU °_.^? N I L+ u 10 Y L u Gy Y p L N 69.. a c q u OdY °r. C« aT A. y eov A q iY 0 U6Ep 6sy U 9SY 1..° «mMUm v °..^.'.�G YAZ"A OAS X44 8 U CI Gq C A «N L ai I. u.�a d,,.,.. v..d c. °ua _ S q L O L E.L.AO Nd CyC Y YY U = A _Z L A. q^i O Yf^OY....Yo d� 9GL0' OU.t 1^4L6 ET oo as ° uAya�..N..N,SC� cuov YpC �7ca�> p E u^ TN 9u 0y� p E =S Y ^ tY 6`Oy� C6 yV ^U"e" .� =dam G06 C ^Ny ^ A a V `cam,N doA N,n'A'_a r rn'�Y° c o ey° '%,a&5 svr d q ^ ^ c Oydt T^ 'O� A AaA Fb8 a� CC @Q p 41 y C.°..O Aa VO wY yyC '�y NN t1EO @yC@pL °pY .EGUY� Y BNd O U ^44 aA p1. O ";d= 3y6 Y om` us as= ^o �N r .-LNUd s�umo:oaN�ni� o -.zooan v m H Z J O O N ~ Z V G¢I 9 6 H f y� N 6 O � H V � O ^WJ J U!U H � j Q Ems^ Ng C TN UU° 11 nu z w. �. l,.E• c".uc c Sv.a .' mY o 0 N3 JE U 9 °�ANV'c E.0 W U LN.nNy.` p .°+ N...o4......q c=? o °O„b� i q L O V QY Yy A _Z L A. q^i O Yf^OY....Yo d� A Y M Y LUG. Y Lp, AC.�6YaY A� � o ou yO� yC Y N wCy p � o rn p qT M�,G yU NU�U U � �6v« E Na. M ia2 a 6 �v a q 46 1.T .i LtO'TsD Y i N� M y 4 tTVwAd j V 1 v b -Y- O Cf. L..C. $L wa.r'., 4dr. O'nsN �Yy `3 .f L: c.n yyq< »R V Yt auw..D "s$' X tc`p Dy..�D..NCaLL 9w�rtN�Y "C p . N= U�-7o`. yy O L R•yCy O. L 'nw V g, y Q { ^, 6LDNLD. +l nxiuL 1r.=..Dr C..�0.g3� Y�CUL U^ L. ry Gb Ng w4 rj o f ar ^ N+gqxx .p.c a bOCQ' wuyVr9 YNU 4J��.NW'Q •Q ^q Y C UClN �.SitQ U +C C L LC T V N'N l .0 I%�. N"b. V2 T CL V_.Q.a `i « ??a J. m=tl .bA N k ui p°!'Q ► OMp. j'aQ E•N^U`N `•-D- '.,1:;,.bp D� NLC r NC ZYv a" RR66� ra Cp �N a. R. C RNV CN w.wY NbY..F+N bN Vbp C'S! Q{E3tgL 3R$uUi NVyCQ3Q L`$�Q, NNw ^Y VM3 44u880 -2 aCb ^m � AwyyN ^�p rwRgbaNr Y> y pyf o �q�gy _ 6brj�Y wN.. ygCb MYp V+LA UN ,N. CT` LYid3 L �.0 L.9 `4M C �O b•6Lw�4...L U �� CL '6 <•. CL. ^C 5u CwN ... qV V doo vv C t„ M V SF s D i O C K6tlo.4 KNV V..• N Li � V4N Y.+..4 Ww1�2 G KL C r"n R i,p N4 V i tit %T aa a tl.T.ci r ,Tw R bt .w •¢L O.eCS w aa�w =ss a.to ague pp g� �.rsL x Vi^ D Q.D+y Hb RV4^ iR�. C• Y 6q t w �.N Cat60 UQ0MN L OA; 2. 9C^ LL1e CB IIIEEE _� Ta A ^1�q.Q YC.i C w y+��: <`^r o �++ S 4 tl Sw C 1VR qq bif � G u V ' M..L by V.s >R _8 WI. WI i NNR 4xy I h3 ^ NS V b u U .>iatl e G< t^C V l ;+ aL QDj .t Um,• j� wr •^• .i 'IS-. a�x .-i✓Jep R.,:`w M D oR Lcya LL..~VN NwQt ^yN+C NaNC Nw by b» COY A,✓..U.Yx.04y•V DVM..<. ONR A "'IA�b N pC1 rx< b QdL �tb GY _b DI =wY'. A+ip1 V Ut'�Qy:N L4 'as a .::C� ai ♦`Ntl M AY. a'34tQ Ldp. .t+ <�a .�, >VN >`B V�`l b>b WgZgjY RU Yys�.'•� {uj MW YM.. O. n! 4C a'cy �QU NyVYeti Y� y ^Nt NO N.y C^V <CVo �OI�T LS W L ^ ^bV A L ^by�.y C OVACraaL C.ti400 A�4L!Y y Hrn+l Ci A+ b^ VU^` OLi q�JCVY.N VV R =N;, vri� WOf. bp 404. AL .<aRtiGb �b. NY p.yy<tt N CL� J ^CN YY A� <` `^.-S..C+ UV {O NV. 4�.�M 9�b6YSC �� ^J1�E D C•pN ^y� Y LuC _wL Ap.9 Cl9 O ?i VgpC b�iL ^MT N «: O. Y ~V V9 a+QS•D M GMU PS G C V g�R 5 21. °>.'^� c+ paGG.�� � T" ors .•c..�pete L..��$y N N� ..LL Oz y4 bN = y0 r b �P 13 •^4 bY.yO CL~�y'Y ebb. DN. DO~QO uaa b bt.c R iM rrO C.^. 1 JC bCCYO+�V Y'O 44 YL NLfy ". ^ >YYy �y 01 ^�1V Va�yilw bpSn, GG A21 ATRa =uH K gat Ln rrL� M L^�C Qu T�OOi 9�p. tt �4N iY.COY V NC I+�CNGA NR L I 1rY DOpO GO a ^c O�y CLLOaC 1 Oa yl u Lp.°i � OIL E.. p .,.d Q a49 N`Jq pO 5Y 2:5 N Z L O,y G dLiLG N♦ q T O. �` n°EIY�pNq > W diCq to '` NpL1�C roN •� " E O NN Y 9 OPa 6m�L. V•C O c q c9a Lv.10 L a� ^p � K� L Ya D. O N V O d O.N O Y.00 > T A ain AY ¢mac Y L €lr C e,Ny Yu d a« a00 ^.� NOYj L Y � 7a.• �. ° Y.p EO .••°- r N aL C90 d N •r Y i.NN Y a Y.Lt i a N.d cd da 2. �L.« > C M Qy5 ' QV/ eUO °n� _ qwP LFi ♦.qq °° Gua a ra ON 9a .' ~ °ro •n L q`oL'u adG ro x Ny � c¢ n °% d a � N.gvY t•V iiv�r c NO v •rC-A �.an p q C L O d a L d n l C d ^�_ Ee g L 9G d N° 6 Eay� .�YO dOl° n O ° c a+« d o a nNOr L� AL iG aY @a°^N q a Yf A'r C >a L O C O O 9 � L O d bid^ idq� u 1LLOOV rdp dp° G W N.. C4 Y dye roa ° p 4.i+N0 •4 gwL.m j dNd 6C'6 E` f- EN d LE H�a V aqq u oa T dA gip. 90 COu C C�V r°�FLl9YCN6dc Y°ro N NroN 4Nr 4N SNO HNt QN a[n,7 4ro.G -G6 L°u LLO•GO GN U t d V ya» _ O c « .-° L 9 d d yaL n p .,.d Q a49 N`Jq pO 5Y 2:5 N Z L O,y G dLiLG N♦ q T O. �` n°EIY�pNq > W diCq to roN •� " LuC i...o ^«aa c qro off.. r N idly 9� 'a 014` '^«o au pW °uv may 90J'9 u G c= C a= Y G L p .rl Old d Ya cN ro Q N Ca N Y« d ¢mac Y L €lr C e,Ny Yu q EES .n�ur� O A q ro« a Y.Lt i a «a c c L y d N.°C Y y« «_� •NroN Y9u ~�' OGN �.r. YLG Lg9�pE9 Ed .° V q N. 4.Ca0 N °�I Nqp 9LVw. pC p q Crod« c L O ay O ^�_ a.9ro CE>o g L 9G d N° 6 SA4° p Y .�YO dOl° n O U.0 • p r Ur E�. d4. V� ° c C C >a L O C O O 9 � d bid^ idq� u io v A � °L �G dye roa ° rn}q. Lr r 4.i+N0 •4 gwL.m j »GA. 6C'6 E` 49N 1»6v6i 6U 69 1�0 4N67 T W66Y{tlr°i y°. C • M .I Nu Gvu NO aev Gd Yo.�v a3i o U LYO •a N EY m� a1" a uT �EFF'OyE a.� E Uuu ^. V.L+ V C ^6 �a9d �GEX O.^1'� 1 u E C Y • N v O= \!1" -•11. kkY t _ y�• -!OOO ^, U> uuC= �"6 J I.zI _ o1µp � E�oL t Y �E W Uu t NN a �N C. C•N ^ ° 6 � a ai GCN Y. <� E VytdEN. NEC F Y Y EE yLN� R C u N �O1Lq yRyyd �L ` a i n Z: CQ u CEa @ °V Sp L ate^ °moo v m .1q: O� . «F .YC a Bq O Yn Ua V F d a � _ LOT +"•..°.N Y=q L m AU.0 Y,Y M1 ° AYE GdGR ROi O Ldd� u °� x1.a o++ •r �m6 O•C.+ C.y..+J ^u CRdjaid 'aGY goAG 9y � 'O C Ci R �. Rua G�i ZE�dN CA6 ^ ^R YU� Q d u ^q6 ^• GC^ 6 M60 C.''� G a '2 F• 2Ry Y dT 6. y.L �a+ N Yy �.y¢,t.s 1` ioR uday Nor v €aie °!°JN GLy ^.o va Er ,NCy N. Y Au udC� d •]y m �g O U + . LEY u G fu. a+Y duA 4 6 gyp. LuEa 01 --w- d C-� m L W O 4N T H>CCSd u=}GL ^> 2 Viz- o. R m 2 VrI E dRuO ° Y Z ��>•u ° =N� 1. 3 .3k -" 6^ od^ 6 Y C r � L ^ It G - d 1 4M. NmL E n -1.5. d� Lv .i m v nL -1-0 �1 E IoO S 'Al .G. NCL Aod I u ua C ayq � q Y •; NL .O°Y0. �N n0. C z0 t Y^ qN GG 1ui1Nd A 6 V }1 .-• ,Q ^ N °� L aR+ A u M ^'o Q N Y N @y iNN Y voi L � H} N L. � YGIA ° ^ L> a 2q NZ N �uN uuOHO tq =jq V c u ^ ^EE+ uV0 FFFFFF))) G q s... O°1C �pv ° LR Ouuy u u�G.0 r2 v °G p�G'o `d Nadu N O' �O .+. >• a n9 N L qoM T...G �ddc d YGO EOC y1dN N On, N LL'+ Y+ n�L u n ^yG d R C N AL A V °E opz Lm. A" N?qL ° y°G GOB ` baui 5X= mE"a o >u a cRT .� ^RL ° d ivE a wL° u a = R Y>yV Gw' nO� o 06 Y WLL c'°'' a ? u L 9 G u= L R a d rG c I C A O _g pO Y V a •.• d ° U+'• U° O = Y �+di.Y. 01 d N Yy d d r N Y Y '� 0. G R Yu MN� Y .21 �L 4;=". i C ^` .� ++ R Y1 Y^ NOY - - d6 d• CI C Y !1 `OCG O•^EE NC ^ ^Ca. U6ga1 01� d a •� L 0.N d WO OdN C A6LL Nom++ •°•, d {�. R LC.Or �•> �� ' HN'd YM NN r t7'^ +i Ems• � F6 ^per O 460 GYN+ U LL E WES a \YYN N M ON Q Z k v N 0 d Ic I� Ll) q ocLc •'aC " ' M C .u, °q Yy d ^. }E real yyLL ` w N 9 u U N .STN 01 d a+y CM –�� • OCNY AYEE LLuL F e L, b N L.0 GYC 6 E CU C 2: C... a..uNp Cp3 N a•• L S d ` yLV� � 4Y N N�V m ° pE m N+'u � au •� a da Na C•°r_ O O q Ex` UN ° � Lam. a .•. ° v 4� d v°1 u aLi ^ ^5E 4. a ddL W� a d O4• A n N .,1U L d E NtOL a' o eSY Nyq qdw dN9 CL TV . QU E W O E e•I. bG Rr L b L q E ^ y0.0 •S+ r� 6N a2 ^ N'd'04 U d adTq U yE p� r 1°.t r C a M qqd C q 0 b C Q p��" UfE.. 6 r C 1Li1A1i N .0 d O� L p a �.. L p UNN> C u� 20 q p O T 9 v oB q q A r c N ^ E n N u o d IL m .00 u 9 6 0 u J 001 d O b 0= Y. 00�W b^ C1°r b C p r �+x V.\• n q` o •E I �O 6LG O Y N" 4Y bu Cq c.°^ud•�, O Z J .TO 17 P N b 0 Ll) •'aC "C M C NW N.Y °L.0 •� Ob 3 b b— ^ u•C U N LQ 01 d a+y CM –�� • OCNY AYEE LLuL N° Y -U.!,. no c Fp � 9uma ^caa ��^ Ap a•„� .^-Y $ n m; i L1`uY. ^uuc lniib2 SQ• " "'a ,ce Q °s tun do c �m'^"e .Y°1b NF3 °e°. A.a ,at °' do d o r.^,, qbN bu Cq c.°^ud•�, <Y E r .TO q L TN qV dt;6� d O LY. 0 GY d d; U .Nn st: -go Z, -O ,L a U q d L w LL b d 0 U ^. Ll O 4 uric 0 L C N L p N nr 6 6 N 6� �d U c ^L �U y nfn > �gyP01 nE°1 °pp YW xgWb =y1.^ LC 6N N. q0 ^p bT ^ xY ��tD uV aq L �^ y O .�O^N ^A ACt.tO d9b0 uY9p d yLdu V +•^ apv W x« C^ 09�n O Lp 2t L N� you AC n1 Lp L'^ ^pNL O CU u Ca TY, N N ^E WN9 N64. W.. ON Yu �p �' �}°i1 U 7 6w 60 a N a N O qOY 01d � KPu ro 6 d EppGE = V N N w 4 N n U b i A N U 1 O T dv y lLJ -G2 tr �L •Jxp,'( - f .fie Ll) > r LN1 0 O d o�. mw a. u . 1 m a n TUNi 9 Aoyb N� N Ou op Na p.`o n Vdy r c � u�•pd O cyU ~ V �o E u q �O =N :39 2 Y L i o i• y °yT � p+ d � -':5 d N N Eqd. 2y c � 'a Sq y N .^O. N TZ 9^ �E ua xzl N cn -66 N b2o Ei v c >N �3 6A4 QL 42 vooN Epp ° UNq NC 6L �T V� Sk cu ACNE °Gn0 CLO` C YGC Cil Lj `�1 LL A -u ca� oa,°o •, '� ° cb =ror v uq iJ. Q.. O ^AN ❑y � y` am q� ai"�° qua+..C.. da ifj L- uy d ' aE. Au n P L01N 2 � d CN. ^aT+ 6i. cW�a 6qu � ^y +`_� CdWFi CpLG Lq '�uO NAYy °V. NO. CE G'nW L r ^Oa.r 9 � CV CY LSY pG �. •� v T 9 .mod o} cy pp F9typ uo ppC �.aN N�UO cvc fit D O a= •-• N NLq° eRa TL G g Y bL U N Lam( L N 6i W N y .ter i N W W .: �yiYYp.4 °� b n. ° C u L L W.bG .'x-'p Xu L > r LN1 0 O d c mw o u . 1 m a n av op Nd •_9jo. S u C' G. St r 2 C Y. i tT N N ' i o i• y L ° �, ° E o Eqd. 2y c � dd y0 Sq yd °plb �a. .^O. N TZ 9^ �E ua xzl N cn -66 N b2o Ei v c >N �3 6A4 QL 42 vooN Epp ° UNq NC 6L �T V� X 74 71-1 -ay r°. a y qq m"y d d ^ L u aCd N. p L nts, s uyEE+ EE �bY o a ° m `o YC o �C�s d tpN � b p C i10 L o Q N c G � T yacu ea N ^ q ! N O U r 12 --ot Zo o- -o l 9 X 11 4! 1 1. 41. 12 E.2 S . I "Z t .2 Is- W6 k ISM P- r,.o,. al'. t O o ;.oB 2-8 oa g 4 o iol -o,. wl w -o Sep m u 4 4 -1 VV aV 1 5 wo. -: Iz r D E W. - viii yr 1Y11LX%JllV - vVUlilYiVlVlrLi r,�}CAM0 STAFF REPORT ��� N�9. O � C UL_ DATE: May 14, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -14 - VETERANS OF FOREIGN WAR - A meeting nal I serving alcoholic beverages .n an existing building with a lease space of 5000 square feet on 3.47 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3), located at 8751 Industrial Lade APN 209 - 031 -74. 1. BACKGROUND: On April 1986, the Planning Commission requested that a representative of the Foothill Fire District make a presentation at the next Planning Commission meeting, Wednesday, May 14, 1986, with regards to the current status of the VFW facility application per 'ne Fire District's requirements. II. ANALYSIS: Staff has contacted the Foothill Fire District whc agreed to have a representative at the May 14th meeting available to answer questions. The applicants of the VFW have also contacted the Fire District following the April 23, 1986 Planning Commission meeting, for further direction and clarification of the Fire District's requirements. Attached for your information are copies of the correspondence from the Fire District to VFW identi.ying the necessary Corrections. It is staff's understanding, at the time this report was written, that the applicant has yet to meet the Foothill Fire District's requirements. Should the applicant meet the. Fire District's requirements after this report is finaled and prior to the Planning Commission meeting, staff will present an update as to the status of this project. HowevEr, if there are issues still unresolved, a representation of the Fire District will be availa.'se to answer questions at the meeting. III. RECOMMENDATION: Upon consideration of the Foothill Fire District's presentation, staff recommends that the Planning Commission revolked Conditional Use Permit 84 -14 through adoption of the .attached Resolution if the fire alarms have not been installed and approved by the Fire District prior to this hearing. ITEM J i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REVOCATION OF CUP 84 -14 - VFW May 14, 1986 Page 2 Pe tfull rjritted �� uller lanner BB:DP:ko Attachments: Fire Distlict Correspondence April 23, 1986 Staff Report Original Resolution & Conditions of Approval Resolution of Revocation ti. i { 4 i FILre PROTECTION DISTRICT P. O, BOX 35 • 6623 AMETHYST 5T. e RANCHO'CUCgMONGA 91701 / r (714) 4874535 lan"o. *y 6, 1986 Mr. Matt Hogue, Commander ! Veterans Of Foreign Wors, Post 8680 r 8757 Industrial Lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Hogue: s An anonymous complaint regarding the VFW occupancy was turned in to the Fire Prevention Bureau. It specifically charges that: 1. Loose and toped wires are all through the ceiling in the bar area. 2. There is a 3" canon shell, with a live explosive head, behind the bar. ' 3. There are no emergency lights, nor smoke detectors. The first two items are a complete surprise to me and will require me to make an on site inspection. If the conditions are truly as we have been told, the VFW mu6't correct this situation immediately. k The third item sounds like something to do with a lire alarm system. You and I earlier disct;ssed what the code required in the way of fire alarm. According to the Uniform Fire Code, a manually operated fire alarm system is required in *the VFW. This would exclude the use of smoke detectors. According to my letter of September 6, 1985, 1 sent you o copy of the fire alarm requirements found in the fire code. We are still waiting to receive fire alarm plans. [( You are requested to do the following: i 1. Send us a letter within five business days stating your intentions to install an approved fire alarm system. The fire alarm system Is still required for the VFW even though you hove reduced the occupant lead of the larger room below 300 persons. The last time I requested this you verbally contacted Fire Marshal Almond, i believe your organizaiton was looking for a new location. 1 must have a decision from you now. 2. With;- 30 calendar days, submit two sets of plans to the fire department for approval, prior to installation of the fire alarm system. 0 S Mr Matt jogue 7-;.W , Commander January W 1986 Page wa Failure to comply with this letter will leave us no choice but to advise tt��, donning deportment to revoke CUP 8444. Thank you for your complete cooperation. Sincerely, Susan D. Walfe Fire Prevention Inspector SDWIss cc. Dino Patrino, Planning Division k t r s Page 2 :XI:S /EXIT CORRIDORS 1.X 2xit signs shall be posted above required exit doors as noted, and illuminated at any time the building 4s occupied. Light intensity AM& of exit signs shall he not less than one footcandle at floor level, qW Exit sign colors shall contrast with the ;walls, with letters not less than 3/4" wide and 6" high. 2 All exit signs shall be on circuits which shall be jeparate from all other circuits -.the building and independently controlled. 3. X Exit door hardware shall be approved panic type and installed as noted on plans. State Fire Marshal listing numbers for pani•hard- •ware shall be submitted to this department prior to installation. 4. X Exit corridor doors shall be State Fire Marshal listed and shall include automatic door closing devices. 5. X Vertical exit corridor wall finish shall meet Class I flame spread ratings. Horizontal exit corridor wall finish shall meet Class II flame spread ratings. DECORATIVE MATERIAL 1. X All drapes, iisngings, curtains, drops and'other decorative material that would tend to increase the fire and panic hazard shall be made from material which is not flammable or shall be treated by means of a flame retardant solution or process approved by this department. 2. X All interior wall finish shall meet Class III flame spread ratings. AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT ~ 1•.X Any air conditioning ducting penetrating an exit corridor shall have a State. Fire Marshal listed and approved fire damper installed. Dampers shall operate by products of combustion dev'-ces. 'State Fire Marshal listing numbers shall be submitted to',— is department [, prior to installation. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS 1•_ Fire lane(s) , cul-- <-5ac(s), hammerheads) or turn- arounl(s) shall be constructed zs z.oced on plans (see attached). EMERGENCY LIGHTING 1.X - If the building-is subject to occupancy during night time hours, emergency lighting shall be installed for all areas of the building. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to this department for approval prior to installation. 2._ Emergency lighting shall be installed for all areas of the building. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to this department fK approval prior to installation. �, Page J ROOM CAPACITIES 1. X Boom capacities have been calculated not to exceed the tollol-Ang. An occupant load sign, which shall be approved by this department, shall be posted in subject room near an exit. LOCATION MAXIMUM PERSONS MAIN BALL DANCING/DINING 267/125 SECOND HALL DRINKING 49 PLAN RESUBMITTALS Resubmit copies Of plan pages' as indicated below, and all oth °r gages as necessaz-y. OTHER N¢ sal-PUUMA& tb s+-bmitAn 83,x11" reduction of the site pla%f-" this departmenttOv .fur ik- permanent files. Bone 419-84 - REbIARKS: According to the revised occupant load, this is an A-3 occupancy, Which means It can share a cOMMbn Wall with the Occupancy to the east, which is a B-2. O(N TION oM 6DNDITIO" _ FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT - -• - PLAN CHECK REPORT OCCCPAINCi NAME: Upland- Rancho Cucamonga VFW Post 8680 CHECKED BY: S.D. Wolf e ADDRESS: 8751 Industrial Lane DATE CHECKED: 072484 Items noted below are to be accomplished /corrected prior to issu«..�-c of permit. Corrections are to be resubmitted to this department for review. FIRE PROTECTION EQUIP MLIT AND SYSTEMS 1. X Fire extinguishers) will be required. The size(s), types), number and location (s) will be determined by this department. Installation is the responsibility of the owaer /occupant and required prior to .occupancy (see attached). 2._ An automatic fire extinguishing system is required. Building construc- tion plans shall have an approval stamp i'rom a licensed structural engineer. Plans shall be submitted to tae City of Rancho Cucamonga and approved by this department and the City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to installation or issuance of a permit. 3._ The automatic fire sprinkler system, including all controls, shall be electronically supervised, with signals terminating at the Eire department dispatching facilities. The proposed method of supervision shall be submitted with the fire sprinkler design. Approvals will be required prior to installation. 4. X An automatic fire extinguishing system shall be installed for the cooking area. Plans shall be submitted to and approved by this department prior to installation. An approved hood and duct system shall be installed (see attached). 5.� Ap,.roved fire hydrants) are required (see attached). Plans shall be submitted to and approved by this department prior to installation. 6._ An approved, supervised smoke detection ` system is required. Plans shall be submitted for approval prior to installation_ A cosy of the service contract shall be provided for fire department files. 7._ Temporary fire protection facilities will be required during building construction. The contractor and /or developer shall contact this department for specific requirements prior to commencing construction. FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS 1. X Fire flow shall be a minimum of 2500 gpm, at a minimum residual pressure of 20 psi, for a duration of 2 hours. Calculatiors" developed by a civil engineer or the Cucamonga County Water District, substantiating that the fire flow will be provided, shall be submitted to this department prior to plan approval. 2._ Fire flow has been previously provided. J _� Business�Ndme V�f.•".,() / - C 9istrict Street Address ,.a+F�Wri11 j 1 plj /� Date a-a S —a lk:s on ��r�e -- NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS..., PUBLIC ASSEMBLY At a recent fire and life safety inspection by this department. your premises were f items checked below. ound to X.ire vie correction of �e YN OK NA VIOLATION 1. O W/( ) Provide and maintain adequate lighting at all times so all persons can readily find, distinguish, and use ways of egress. 2. O (! ) Provide and 'nstall a Lrcved* exit sign(s) at the following location(s): A. C. �--= -1 3. O ( ) ( ) Provide and instaii approved + emergency lighting at the following location(s): A. f 1t CA h1 M f- A/! B.• C. A• be provided anelor maintained as follows: S. (1,4 r ( ) Fire extinguish -rs; shall be provided and /or maintasned as follows: A = Install B = Service C = Relocate D - Repair TYPE NEED LOCATION 6. (} O ( Automatic sprinkler system tested date. Deficiencies requiring correction: T. O O ( Fire alarm system tested dste. Deficiencies requiring correction: B. jl ( ) Provide and install approved panic hardware* upon the following doors (existing locks upon these M'21—LA1,&14aAAt it be remove e kA , 9. 141 ) ( ) Provide proof of approved flame retardr.nt treatment of the following items or decorations (failu to provide State Fire Marshal certification will salt in our testing of sample(s) at owner's e se, as ne scary) ^ r �-8 f page 2 of 2 pages �,�- Business Name 1� Business Adress nyr�Sryi �t') vN OK NA c' ,,, - , 11 r• �W VIOLATION 14, y , ( ) ( ) Provide and maintain electrical wiring 'nd applia ces in a s fe cannd , Deficiencies requiring correction: �I a ` �. Provide and' maintain •,torage in a safe mgnne5. Defici cjes requiring correction: M r 12. O ("f'( Provide and install occupant load signs as directed (letters and numbers minimum 1' high on tort backgy-opryd): 13. {) (.J ( ] Fire lanes shall be maintained unobstructed and pasted with an aooroved sign. Sign specifications provided by Fire District. 14. O (L Address visible. Numbers minimum 3' high on contrasting background. 15. O (`7 { ) Conplete Appiiearion(s) for Permit(s) for the following: A. B. C. 16. O ( ) (/J Items referred by Fire District to other agencies for aiint follow -up, enforcement, etc.: C. 'footnote: Specifications for appliant::_ appurtenances, locking mechcnisms, piping and wiring required by this official) notice shall be submitted to Fire District for approval Prior r for to installation. A s r ov ale diagram will probably a required. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: I&OLne AIM a (- 0 IL — � A n CORRECTIONS SHALL BE ADE IMMEDIATELY A reinspection to determine compliance will be corducted oq_ �� QQ�% barring a fire department emergency. If you have any problems or ques�ion p ease contact t e un ersi ne rt r reinspection dale. g p o_ r' A; F OTNiLL FIRE DISTRICT D. Box 35 ncho Cucamonga, CA 91701 14) 987 -2535 iginalTIOFi iginai - Fire Prevention Bureau �Py - Compady Representative Signed: ' ire epartmenc epresent i v., Notice Delivered to: - p-G (CDmpzny Representativ ignatu e gusire; .Name Street Address m 5-7%5`1 District `� Date NOTICE OF VIOLATION PUBLic AsSEMBLY ir; At ms check fir,: e <od life safety inspection by this department, your premises Zaere fj;nd to require correction of the items checked. below. VIM OK NA YIOLITION Provide and maintain adequate lighting at all times so all persons can readily find, distinguish, and use ways of egress. Z• O ('7 l) Provide and install a oroved* exit sign(s) at the following location(;): A. — - . r cwa ( ) ( ) ( ) Provide and install a roved" emergency lighting at the following location(s): 3 C a O O (tip ' °fixed automatic fire etanguishing system* shall be � tided and /or maintained as follows: 5• P1 ( ) ( ) Fire extinguishers shall -be provided and /or maintained .s follows: A = Install B - Service C =Relocate D = Repair TYPE NEED LOCATION ft a4! 1,U 5. (} O (� Automatic sprinkler system tested — date. Deficiencies requiring correction: d. i e qurn 9 correctio n. g O ('7 Fire alarm system-tested 8• ( ) ( ) Provide and install approved panic hardware* upon the following doors (existing locks upon these moors shat] be re ovea)V " d 9h& �Q IA g• Provide proof of approved flat to provide State Fire Marshal se, as pecessary9: i - treatment of the following items or decoratigns (failure in will result in our testing of sample(s) a _owner's !1 r ! LA rage 2 o 2 pages Business Nar•��' r CLIV— . Business Adress � VN K NA _ VIOLATION g [ S-1 10. ( )wide and ma Pain electrical _ .1. hiring ard, appliances ' a safe ma�ne/� Def2?_ ^ciao re uiri- correcticn:V i �11�L/ i/1 t &"OR. I9 /t i s 1' O (Lf [) Provide and maintain storage in a safe manner. Deficiencies requiring correction: 13. O (vr (. ? Provide and tal occuoant load signs s d'rect lette s an numbers minimum high -c ,ontrastin background): d ( � S =C I Ake- > 7717 1 tnel+�� B L vim. 13. f O Fire lanes sF be maintained unobstructed and posted with an aooroved sign. Sign specifications pro ided b Fire District. 14. ( ) {) Address visible. Numbers minimum 3" high on contrasting hackgrounc• Is. ( / (V) O Comp^te Applications) for rPermit(s) for the following: r B'. 16. W( ) (V/Items referred by Fire District to other agencies r. ' 'Dint follow -!rp, enforcement, etc.: is C. 'footnote: Specifications for appliances, appurtenances, locking mechanisms, pip fro and wiring required by this official' notice shall be submitted to Fire District for approval prior to installation. A scale diagram will probably 6e`"required. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: CORRECTIONS SHALL BE P "IMMEDIATELY A reinsp•ction to determine compliance will' be conducted on d0Y3 W..sp� a fire department emergency. If you have any problems ose contact t e un e— rsignt , orror to the te.spection date. rw' Signed: i �Frre epartmen epresenta}'ry it e Notice Oeliv, red to: (Company RepresentaJ a Signature) FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT P. a. Box 35 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 (714) 967 -2535 i� if ISTRIBUTION: riginrl - Fire Prevention Burea; opy - Company Representative J —1� t Fig PROTECTION D15- TRJ(c P. O. BOX 35 • 6623 AMETHYST ST. • RANCHO CUCAMONGA 41701 1714) 987 -2535 �. September 6, 1985 V Mr. Matt Hogue, Commander Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post 8680 8751 Indust_ial Lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. HogLe: As a result of a reinspection conducted September 5 to chess{ compliance with a Notice of Violation dated August 23, I.am left no choice but to write you this letter of warning. Most of the violations noted in August were not corrected,, This fact is jeopardizing your Conditional Use Permit by allowing your eccupancy to continue to operate in an vnsaie manner. 4 .• I must also advise you it has come to my at_ ntion your facility is required to have a fire alarm system in accordance with tke Uniform Fire Code, Appendix III -C. I have enclosed a copy of the alarm description. I have explained to the Fire Marsha:. this is the first time you have been told about having a fire alarrr.,, He has directed the following shall apply to the VFW occupancy: 1. Within five business days of receipt of tlis_ letter, you must inform us in writing if you . intend to install the fire alarm system. 2. If you do not choose to comply with the fire . alarm requirements, the Fire Marshal will order the large assembly room to be padlocked. closed until the fire alarm is installed and all other deficien^,ies in this room are corrected. Eliminating the use of the larger room will accomplish several things: 1. It changes the occupancy elassifiGation from an A -3 to a B -2. This means none of the curtains in your building have to be flame - retardant treated. 12 y z Mr. Matt Hogue, VFW September 6, 1985 page two 2. It negates the requiremzzt to have afire alarm system by reducing the total occupant load below 300 persons. 3. It means the panic hardware does not have to be repaired or adjusted in the Main Hall. Any questions should be directed to Chief Almand during the week of September 9. I have scheduled a reinspection for September 19 at 2 :00 p.m. P Failure to correct all violations by the 19th will result in our recommendation to revoke the Conditional Use Permit on your occupancy. I again sclicit yo*nr cooperation in bringing the VFW up to minimum fire and life. safety standards. I r Sincerely, G k Susan D. Wolfe Fire Prevention Inspector enclosure i F mbm I i Fo(Ahill Fire, PROTECTION DISTRICT P.O. BOX 35 -6623 Jar+IETHYST ST, s RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 AO A�� - (714) 987 -2535 �y�Rj 9 GT�?9�c $1, cP G a o August 28, 1985 rZ9f0'� 1io♦ Vim. Z9. �g r� P r 6, A r� #, Mr. Bruce Cook Planning Department !, City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 �, r Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: VFW, 8751 Industrial Lane Dear Mr. Cook: This is the i o erwork on the VFW I discussed with p P , ou Friday, August , 23. As you con see, the;i have some violations which should be correc- ted by September S. I985. t Please call if you have any questions regarding this occupancy. I shall advise either you or Dan Coleman when all the vio,,tions are corrected: Sincerely, Susan D' Wolfe Fire Prevention /spec *or SDWIss enclosures Foothill Fire PROTECTION -D)TSTR= P. O. BOX 35 . 6623 AMETHYST ST. a RANCHO CuCAMONGA 91701 00•,IM II . �� I'i,. C GUC T DEPT - �'';:,: KT DEPT. (714) 987 -2535 FEB ig, February 19, 1985 AM p� Ms. Nancy Fong, Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: CUP - VFW Post 8880, 8751 Industrial Lane Dear Ms. Fong: As of this time, we have not issued a hermit to conduct a piace of public assembly to the VFW. Aft The VFW still owes us a plan showing all the aisle ways in the respective assembly rooms. It was decided tbgt the video games would be relocated, which will change the occupant load in the "Second Hall ". The VFW must also submit a letter stating .here will be no frying in the kitchen. otherwise�we will be forced to ask for a fixed automatic fire extinguishing system over the stove. At this time, we prefer to deAy extension of the CUP until such time as all our requests have been met. Thank you for your cooperation, Sincerely, °,,OLtiJ01A ` (,{J`/�`�1 f /fin Susan D. Wolfe / Fire Prevention Inspector SDW /s5 gas CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT CLCF XrpN O f 11977 DATE: April 23, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -14 - VETERANS OF FOREIGN A - A meeting hall serving alcoholic everages in an exis ing ouilding with a lease space of 5;000 square feet on 3.47 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3), located at 8751 Industrial Lane - APH 209 - 031 -74. I. BACKGROUND: On August 8, 1984, the Planning Commission approved i;ar, is o aC' Use Permit 84 -14 with a 12 -month review period. On October 5, 1985, the Planning Commission conducted a 12 -month review of Conditional Use Permit 84 -14 to determine whether the use operation was consistent with the conditions of approval and applicable City codes. On March 26, 1986, the Planning Commission determined that there was sufficient evidence to warrant a full examination to consider revocation and set a public hearing for tonightS meeting. This revocation consideration is due to the failure to comply with the Foothill Fire District requirements to install fire alarms. II. ANALYSIS: According to Chief Almond of the Foothill Fire District, e epnone conversation, on Thursday, April 10, 1986), the applicant has yet to meet the Fire Districts requirements. In addition, the applicant has failed to submit plans per the Fire District's request. However, the applicant has taken further steps in meeting the Fire District's requirements such as purchasing the necessary installation equipment, according to Chief Almond. Apparently Cie applicant is making forward - progress but Is not completing tie work in a reasonable amount of time. Should the applicant meta the Fire District's requirements after this report Js finaled and prior to the Planning Commission meeting, Staff will then present jin< update as to the status of this project. .i .. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 23, 1986 CUP 84 -14 - VFW Page Z AMIL III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission revoReondifi"onal Use Permit 84 -14 through adoption of the attached Resolution if the fire alarms are not instal=led and - approved by the Fire ri trict prior to this nearing. Respe tfu/l� y su itt Brad Buller City Planner BB:DP :das Attachments: March 26, 1986, Staff Report Original Resolution and Conditions of Approval AML l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino,',A�sitant Planner G�`O CLG1bfp�Cy < i o�� � z � Q z 1977 I SUBJECT: REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -1v - VETERANS OF FOREIGN !TARS - A meeting hall serving alcholic beverages in an existing building with a lease space of 5,000 square feet on 3.47 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) located at 8751 Industrial Lane - APN 209- 031 -74 I. LACKGROUND: On August 8, 1984, tFe Vianning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 84 -14 with a 12 -month review period. On October 9, 1985, the Planning Commission conducted a l2 -month review of Conditional Use Permit 84 -14 to determine the use operation consistent with the conditions of approval and applicable City codes. It was reported that the applicant had yet to meet the Foothill Fire District's requirement to install fire alarms. The Commission granted the applicant 90 days to comply with Fire District requirements and direct staff to prepare a status report for Commission review. II. ANALYSIS: According to the Foothill Fire District, the applicant has yet to meet the Fire District's requirements (see letter dated January 6, 1986). The applicant ha,: failed to submit a letter of intention and plans per the Fire Dist, ^ict's request. The applicant did install a fire alarm system, however, the instailtion does not meet the Fire District's standards. After re- construction to address the Fire District's correction comments, the Fire Marshall made a recent inspection (week of March 17, 1986) and found th the installation continues to be non- conforming with the District', requirements. It is believed that the applicant has had more than a sufficient amount of time to comply with the Fire District requirements. The Planning Commission may periodical review any Conditional Use Permit to insure that it is being oprated in a manner consistent with conditions of approval or any manner which is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welzare, or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. If, After review, the Commission deems that there is sufficient e0d+ence to warrant a full examination, than a publi- heard;; shall be set to consider revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. z ,: PLANNING COMMIS On S7 ^F REPORT CUP 84 -14 = VFW A. March 2E 1986 Page 2 III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that tlere is sufficient evidence to warrant a full examination for revocation 23, 1986. and set a public hearing date for April f R eedctfully itt �, ?' Brad Buller City Planner BB:DP:ko t. RESOLUTION NO. F ? -76 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERIFIT No'. 84 -14 FOR A MEETING HALL LOCATED AT 8751 INDUSTRIAL, LANE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY (SUC.,REA 3) WHEREAS, on the 16th day of July, 1984, a complete application wis filed by VFW Po*�-.,8680 for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of August, 1484, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission W d a public hearing to consider the above- described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolvitd as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: L That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the purposes of the Lane, Use category in which the site is located. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the !vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -14 is approved subject to :he Yollowing conditions: 1. Any proposed charges to the general activities pe- staining to the use a: described by the applicant in this application must be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to those changes commencing. 2. Prior to the use of the building or business being commenced thereon, the existing building shall be made to comaly with current Uniform Building Code and State Fire Mq, *,all regulations. The applicant shall contact the City's Building and Safety Division and Foothill Fire District to discuss these requirements. I*- C. t _ „,° 4; Al / �w,ri . h 01 �4 ,, d Resolution 91o. ! Page 2 APPROVED AND AOOPTEO THIS 8th DAY OF AUGUST, 1984. PLANNYG $OMMISSION OF.IHF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONSA �< uenms t Stou )airman f. ATTEST: iC Gotuez, Deputy Secretary _ I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutiotr was duly and regularly introduced, rte= ed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of August, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: t AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, BARKER; CHITIEA, McNIEI- -STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS-, NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS NONE I, SS; f l it , r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF T4E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVOCATING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 8444, A MEETING HALL SERVING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN AN EXISTING BUILDING WITH A LEASE SPACE OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET ON 3.47 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3), LOCATED AT 8751 INDUSTRIAL LANE, WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) VETEPANS OF FOREIGN WARS (VFW) filed an application for the approval of a Conditional Use Permit 84 -14, described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the CUP ". (ii) On August 8, 1984, the Planning Commission ,:proved the CUP with a 12 -month review period. On October 9, 1985, the Comni ,ion conducted a 12 -month review of the CUP to determine the use operation consistent with the conditions of approval and granted a 90 -day compliance review period. On March 26, 1986, the Plaeuing Commission determined that there was sufficient evidence to warrant a full examination, for revocation and set a public hearing date fur April 23, 1986. On prtT 23, 1986, the Commission heid a public hearing to consider revocation of the CUP and continued the public hearing to the next Planning Commission meeting. Thereafter, on May 14-, 1986, the Commission continued a public heraing to consider revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Thi^ Commission hereby _pecifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of triis Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- r-eferensed August 8, 1984, October 9, 1985, March 26, 1986, April 23, 1986, tnd May 14, 19;6 Planning Commission meetings, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The operation of the VFW facility is inconsistent with the General Plan regarding the compliance with the Foothill Fire Protection ;. District's fire safety requiremen-s, JI b. The operation of the VFW facility does not conform with the conditions of approval, as stated in Resolution in that fire alarms have not been installed is required by State Fire Marshall regulations. -J -a-�- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLCION May 14, 1986 CUP 84 -14 - VFW Page 2 C. The operation of the VFW facility could have a significant impact on the environment by exposing the members of tie VFW organization and persons and properties immediately adjacent to the subject site to fire hazards. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced Planning Commission meetings and upun specific findings of fact set forth in "81" and "82" of this Resolution above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The :�Peration of the VFW facility 4s not consistent with the General Pfun; b. The operation c7 the VFW facility is pet consistent in the conditions of approval. C. The operation of the VFW facility may cause substantial environmental damage. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in this Resolution, this Coam'tssion hereby revokes Conditional U;e. Permit 84 -14. APPROVED "ND AiiOPTED THT.a 14TH DAY:Uf MAY, 1966. PLANNING COMMISSION OF r4E CITY Dr RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. tout, hairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy ecreta�, I, Brad Buller, Deputy* Secretary of t:le Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and reqularly introducwd, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of -Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular ineet;nq of the Planning Commission held on the 14th �-y of May, 1986, by the following vota -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ic CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA. MEMORANDUM 11 DATE: May 14, 1986 t'l ^ s 19V -TO: Chairman and 4embers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner'° BY: Nancy Fong; Associate Planr+�r SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -03 - A.JA - the —development of one 1 -s ory' office 13u11ding totaiing 22?300 square feet, "c one - story: Research & ^eve;jpment /Of se building totaling 38,940 square feet and two 1 -story multi - tenant industrial buildit,,,totaling 28;228 square feet on 7.n4 acres of land in the Industrial Park District ':(Subarea 6) and Haven Avenue'-Overlay District, located at the northeast ^orner of Haven Avenue and Acitcia Street - APIN •209 - 401 -01 Rel« =,f File - DR 95 -45) The Planning Coranission, at the April 9, :986 meeting, continued the public hearing to this agenda, and directed the applicant to work wits staff in resolving the Planning Commission °s conce-ns on the site plan and e%vations. T:lis pro � t requi'ed a Conditional Use Permit because the applicant had proposed Research & Development /Office for two of the buildings pursuant to the Faven Ave..aue Overlay District.: The developer no longer wishes to pursue the Research '& Development /Office use, therefafe, a Conditional Use Permit is net required (see le}ter from 4he developer). Staff recommends that the Planning Commission close the public hearing for CUP 86 -03 since no actin is required. The staff report for Development Review 85 -45 for the ;wew proposcJ office and multi - tenant industrial devezopmenz has beer 'attached `or your revi rzw. i BB: NF: ko L_ ir CITY C.r^ RA1ITCu0 CUCAMUrTGA STAFF REPORT O C1 DATE: May 14., 1986 tsr TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 8Y: Nancy Fong, Associata Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -45 AJA The development ofi two office buildiags totaling 62,000 square feet and two 1 -story multi- tenant industrial buildings totaling 38,228 square +eet on 7.09 acres of lard in the I'idiist; ial Pars: +District (Subarea 6), and Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street - APN 209- 401 -01, (Continued from the April 9, 1986 meeting.) (Previously submitted as Conditional Use Permit 86 - 11,) I. ABSTRi.CT: The developer is requesting for approval of .f o Alan, elevations and issuanct, of a Negative Oeclaration. II. 8ACKGROUNJ: The "Planning Commission, at it's April 9, 1986 meeting, held a public hearing, considered public input, and con,.3nued the project to this regu'!ar meeting. The Planning Coiiumission -aised concerns regarding the consistency of the design with the high- quality, sophisticated office park character required by the Haven Avenue.. Overlay District. The Planning Commission directed the 0- cast to ret se the site plan and elevations to address their ,Cerns, On April 17, 1986, the Planning Commission conducted a 5rerv.,' workshop to review the revised site plan and elev ;Xtions. III. ANALYSIS: A. Site Plan: The revisec site play- indicates a 2- story, traingular shaped office building and a 1 -story large "C"- shaped office buiding along Haven Avenus with a large plaza area in between. The building orientation o °ovides maximum �creening of the park;ng ,,•Peas- At the workshop, the Planning " - - -mn r�gycsted a c; -oss- section to illustrate the grade differ, the future detour and Building B. Exhibit I'D" sJh "an from the point of Haven Avenue to Building B bt tha construction of the uetoar for comparison. 'N +� - ' the Commission at the l n PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 85-45 - AJA May 14, 1986 no, a op was that the revised site plan was consistent with the Haven Avenue Overlay nittri'ct. D. Elevations The new elevations show a 2 -story offi,.e +nor ui; Ing A located at the corner of Acacia Street and Haven Avenue. Thz pr-)posed elevations fcr all of the ouildings show articulation isa the building pianes with variation ii depth, angle, and recessed npening;; that provide shadow patterns and jj variation in surface treatment The Pllt.ning,.,Commisv ^.on at the Aprii 17, 1986 workshop re.:ommended the following revist)ns to the elevations: 1. Roof height variation to Building B stall be provided. '^e, proposed elevation for Building B shows a s fight roof height variation due to grade charge:. ay shown in ;Exhibit "G2 ". Staff reromTends shai greater roof height vari ati un be provided by„ extending the height of the roof subject to ci.y. Planner review and approva ". 2. Building D that fronts on Acacia Street should, include treatment °to tuilding plane that ties i_ wi.h the building plane of the rest of Buildings A, B, & C. The west e,svati,)n of Building D ahow similar . building pl. %ne treatment as in Buildinn C. However, the,!southeast corner of Building D could be cut at an angle to eliminate tE4 first roll -up service door that is most visible? -from public view on Acacia Street, This same treatment could be -repeated at the southeast corner .',.Building C and the northeast corner of Building D for consistency of Lhe building plan (see Exhibits "C ", "G4 "', and "G5 ". 3. Additional architectural treatment: su+:h as more glass area be provided to. the south elevation of Building B a± well as wrapping around the same treatment to the east elevation. (The developer has incorporated this recommendation as shown in Exhibit "G211.) n�. r r PLANNING "OKASSION STAFF REPORT DR 85 -45 - AJA May 14, 1986` Page 3 Y. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consisi:ant Oth the General Plan, . Industrial 'Pecs is Plan and the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The '. project will not cause significant adverse environmental impacts an _in addition, thy, proposed use, building design, and site plan together with the recommended Conditions of Approval are in compl4ance with the Industrial Specific Pan and Haven Avenue Overlay District and all applicable provisions of the City Standards. ` V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff rrcomnends that the Planning Commission approve 6 eve opmen ;view 85 -45 and issue a Negative Declaration. Respectfully sub `tted,'` Brad Buller City Planner BB.NF:ko Attachments: April 11, 1;.6 Summary of Planning Commiission Workshop for CUP 86 -03 (DR 85 -45) t April 9, 1986 nlanning Commit ioa Staff Report March 26; 1986 Planning Commission StaVi`Report R Minutes E),hibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Revised Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Cross Sections ;Exhibit "E" - Revised Conce., %tual Grading Plan Exhibit "F" Revised Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" Revised Elevations • a< Init al Study, Part IL Resolution of Approval r k 4 1 SUMMARY OF PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP FOR CUP 86 -03 J DATE: April 17, 1486 TiMF 7:00 p.m. (following Design Review Committee Meeting) PLACE: Neighborhood Center RTTENDANCE: Planning Commission: Staff Attisndees Dennis Stout Dan Coleman 70—IF Utman Dave Barker Brad Buller Gi') Aja Suzanne Chitiea Nancy Fong Ti(h Beedle Larry McNiel Barrye Hanson Daji Richards Herman Rempei S*: _,ve Wheatly' The Planning Commission, at its April 9, 1986 regular meeting, held a public hearing and continued the project to this special Planning Commission workshop. The Planning Commission raised concerns regarding the site plan and elevations in that the design did not project a high quality, sophisticated style as required by the Haven Avenue Overlay District. At this meeting, the developer attempted to address the concerns of the Planning Commission by providing revised site plan and elevations for review. The proposed Building A is now a tWo -story office building, while the proposed Building B is a one -story office building. ReseArch and Development /Office Use will not be proposed for this project. The Planning Commission reviewed the revised site plan and elevations and recommended the following revisions: 1. Site plan concept comply with th^: design goals of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The Planning Commission, however, is concerned with the grade differential between the detour and Building B. The Planning Commission recommended that a true cross - section (to scale) from the point of Haven Avenue to Building B before and after the construction of the detour be provided for comparison. Z. Provide roof height variation to Building B. 3. Building D that fronts on Acacia Street should. include treatment to building plane that ties in with the building plane of the rest of Buildings A, B &.1 C. 4. Additional architectural treatment such as more glasF area be provided to the south 'elevation of Building B as well as wrapping around the same treatment to the east eievation. 5. Staff recommends to the developer that the revised site plan should be forwarded to the Fire District and the Sheriff's Department for their comments. The Planning Commission Workshop was adjourned to the May 14 regular Planning Commission meeting at 8 :00 p.m. a E — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT I - DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: G��O G�;,G1btp,�C9. OBI G A I, z April 9, 1986 19r, Chairman and "embers of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City planner Nancy Fong, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -03 AJA - The development of one office building totaling 4T, 909 square feet and four 1 -story multi- tenant industrial buildings totaling 70,076 square feet on 7.09 acres of land in° the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) and the Haven Overlay District located at the northeast ::�rner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street - APN 209 - 401 -01 (Continued f;om Marc: 26, 1586 meeting) Previously submitted as Development Review 85 -45 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Actiov Reuested: Approv!1 of site plan,, eievat;ons and issuance of a Negative Declaration, Conditional Use Permit for Research & Development /Office use for Buildings B and C. B. Surrounding Land Use and Toni North Vacant, AT & SF Railroad tracks; Industrial Park District (Subarea €), Haven Avenue Overlay District. South - Office building under construction; Industrial Park District (Subarea 6), Haven Avenue Overlay District. East - Warehouse /distributior buildings; Industrial Park District (Subarea 6). West - Vacant; Industrial Park District (Subarea 6), Haven Avenue Overlay District. C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial park, Haven Avenue Gverlay District. North Industrial park, Haven Avenue Overlay District. South - Industrial park, Haven Avenue Overlay District. East Industrial park. West - Industrial park,, Haven Avenue Overlay District. D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant. and ,,elatively level. ,_ Metropolitan Waiver Distr`-t easement exists :within the landscape setback area along acacia Street. A landscape, I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -03 - AJA April 9, 1986 Page 2 Em easement and a construction easement exist wii.hin the landscaping and bulding setback area to the west and an 8th Street easement exists within the parking area to the north (8th Street has been vacated by the City). Although the grade . is substantially below Haven Avenue, the ultimate plan tc, build an underpass under the railroad tracks which would reverse the grades. E. Applicable Regulations. The Haven Avenue Overlay District covers the westerly 300 feet of the project site (includes Building A, B. and C). The Haven Avenue Overlay District-gave special consideration to the site and would allow Research and Development uses 'within &,ildings B & C subject to a Conditional Use Permit. Tue office use of Building A is permitted. The multi- tenant 'Induss,-iai use of Buildings 0 & E is permitted by Subaru :a 6. II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The Planning Commission, at it's regular March 26,, 98� 6 meeting, continued this item in order to advertise a public hearing for the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed Research & Cevelopment /Office u..e for Buildings 8 and-C. The proposed project consists of Office, Research & Development/Office and multi- tenant industrial buildings. The overall site plan with this building placement, dispersed parking areas in the plaza, complies dith the development policies for Haven Avenue. The elevations reflect a sophisticated style of architecture th;„': consists of painted concrete panels with reveals, painted accent bands and spa -idrel glass (see Exhibit "F "). ThE proposed land use for Buildings 8 & C is Research and Development / Offfice. At the time of the Design Review Committee process-, the Planning Commission had recommended to the City Council ar. amendment to the Haven Avenue Overlay District to add Research & Development /Office as a permitted use. Huwever, after 'two public hearings, the proposed amendment failed to receive City Council approval. 'be Haven Avenue Overlay District, however, gives special consideration to parcels e4rectly adjacent to the railroad which is the case for this project site. The planning Commission may consider additional uses permitted in Subarea 6 subject to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit and a firding that sup :h use will be consistent with the stated design goals for Haven Avenue. To ensure that the uses meet the City Is definition of Research & Development /Office, staff recommends a coiJition_ be imposed �a` Ul Y• PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -03 - AJA April 9, 1986 Page 3 requiring that prospective tenants be notified in writing of such limitation. Further, prospective tenants shall be required to submit a detailed description of their business operation prior to occupancy and prior to approval of business license. B. Desi n Review Committee: The Committee has reviewed the project and has recommended approval with the following conditions which the developer agreed to: 1. Cross sections should be provided for the northwest por,:ion of the site showing the proposed site design without the "detour" and one with the "detour" incorporated. 2. Buildings D & E should be identified as multi tenant industrial buildings with 1 per 400 square foot parking ratio. 3. A combined monument /project identification sign should be provided at the northeast corner o-,' Haven Avenue and Acacia Street. The design of such sign should be consistent with the southerly approved project (DR 84 -51). 4. Special landscaping treatment should be provided along Acacia Street and within parking ama, including canopy shade trees, to mitigate the loss of tree planting within the, Metropolitan ;Water District easement. 5. Any proposed roof mounted equipment should be screened and the design be architecturally integrated with the elevations. The applicant's devised plans address Items I and 2 as shown in Exhibits "C "and "G ". Items 3, 4, 5 would be included in the Conditions of Approval for the CUP. C. _U *ility Undergroundina: Overhead utilities exist on the opposing _ide of Haven Avenue ono the project side of Eighth, rStrjaat easement. It ;s recommended that the applicant pay an in -Lieu fie equivalent to one -half of the established cost of ❑ndergrounding the telecommunica ion lines along the street frontage of Haven Avenue and require the applicant to underground the electrical and toleco,nmuniccion lines along the' Eighth; Street frontage at their expense. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -03 - AJA April 9, 1986 Page 4 D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impac} as a resc,lt of this project. If the Commission concurs with These findings, issuance of a Negative.,Oeclar;,tion would be in order following the CUP hearing. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS The project is consistent with the General Plan, the Industrial pecific Plan, and the Haven Avenue - Overlay District! In addition, the propnsed Research & Development /Office use is consistent with the design goal for the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The project will Mt cruse sian,Ficant advF <-se environmental impacts. The prJposed use, building design, and site pl4n together with t,ie recomniended condition:: of approval', are in compliance with the Industrial Specific Plan and the Haven Avenue Overlay District and all other applicable provisions of the City standards. V. CORRESPO!DENCE: This item has been advertised in The Jail �Repoort newspaper as a public hearing and notices were sent to al pl _roperty owners within 300 feet of, the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff vacommends that the Planning 0--ission approve Conditional Use Permit 86 -03 and issue a Negative Declar_:. un. Re� ctfully sltbblxitt Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF:ko ' Attachment. Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Detail Site Plan Exhibit "D" ,- Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "E" Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Elevations Exhibit "G" - Parking Calculations Initial Study, Part II Resolution of Approval a 1 J 11 CITY OF RANTCi!O CUC.&IMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 26, 1986 193i � TO: Chairman and Membars of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner B1': Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -45 AJA - The development of one office building totaling 42, '900 square feet and four 1 -story multi- tenant industrial buildings totaling 70,076 square feet on 7.09 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) and Haven Overlay District located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Acac =a Street - APN 209- 401 -01 I. PROJECT.AND SITE DESCRIF'iIOO: A. Action Re nested: Approval of site plan, elevaticas and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surroundin Lan - i Use and Zoning: North Vacan "' Al Railroad tracks; Ind,�atrial Park District (Subarea 6), Haven Avenue Ove^Fay District. South - Office building unler construction, Industrial Park Distric -t (Subarea 6), Haven Avenue Overlay District. East - Warehouse /distribution buildings; Industrial Park District (Subarea 6). West - Vacant; Industrial Park District (Subarea 6), Haven Avenue Overlay District. C. General PIan Desi nations: Project Site - Industrial park, Haven Avenue Overlay District. North - Industrial park, Haven Avenue. Overlay District. South - Industrial park, Haven Avenue Overlay District. East - Industrial park. West - Industrial park, Haven Avenue Overlay District. D. Site Characteristics: The site i,, vacant and relatively level, A Metropolitan Water District easement exists within the landscape setback area along Acacia Street. A landscape easement and a construction easement exist within the landscaping and building setback area to the west and an 8th Street easement exists within the parking are, to the north (8th Street has been vacated by the City). Although the grade is substantially below Haven Avenue, the ultimate plan to build ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSION Sr/-'7 REPORT AR 85 -45 - AJA i March 26, 1985 Page 2 Ll an underpass under the rviln)ad tracks would reveese the grades. E. Applicable Regulations: The Haven Avenue Overlay District covers the west— e` rly 300 feet of the project site (includes Building A, B. and C). The Haven Avenue Overlay District gave epecia. consideration to tLe site and would allow Research and Development uses within Buildings B & C subject to a Condition7 Use Permit. The office use of Building A is permitted. The multi- tenant industrial use of Buildings D & E is permitted by Subared 6. 1I. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed development consists of Office, Research & Development /Office and multi- tenant industrial builldings. The overall site plan with this building Placement , dispersed parking areas in the plaza, complies with the development policies for haven Avenue. The elevaticy►s reflect a' sophisticated style of architecture that consists of paintrd concrete panels with reveals, painted accent bands and spandrel glass (see Exhibit "F'" ). tie proposed 'land use for 00 1dings 1t & C is Research and Development /Office. At the time of the Design Review Committee process, the Planning Commission had recommended to the City Council an amendment to the Haven Avenue Overlay District to add Research & Development/Office as a permitted vse. Howeter, after two public hearings, the proposed amendment failed, to receive City Council approval. 'therefore, Research & Development /Office would now re uire review and approval of a Conditional' Use Permit. The a 'leant was notified rF this requirement and a pub is hearing will be set upon receipt of ,a CUP application and balance of fees. B. Design Review "-mmmittee: The Committee bas revi-wed the project and 'as re" ended approval W i the following conditions W zh the deve!oper agreed to: 1. Cross sections should be provided for the northwest portion of the site shoring . the proposed site design without the "dF,- tcur11 and one witil the "detour" incorporated. 2. Suildings R & E should be identified as multi- tienant industrial buildings wtch 1 per 400 square foot parking ratio. 'i __ PLANNING COMMISSION STt't REPORT DR 85 -45 - AJA Y 3 March 26, 1986 Page 3 3. A combined monument /project identification sign should be provided at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street. The design of such sign should be consistent with the southerly approved project (DR 84 -51). 4. Special landscaping treatment should be provided along Acacia Street and within parking area, including canopy shade trees, to mitigate the loss of tree planting within: the Metropolitan Water District easement. 5. Any proposed roof mounted equipment should be screened and the design be architecturally integrated with the elevations. The applicant's revised plans addrEas Items 1 and 2 as shown in Exhibits "C "and "G ". Items 3, 4, 5 would be included in the Conditions of Approval for the CUP. C. Utility Undergroundin4: Overhead utilities exist on the opposing side of Haven Avenue and the project side of Eighth Street easement. It is recommended that the applicant pax an in -lieu fee equivalent to one -half of the established cost of undergrounding the te`ecommunic6tion lines along the street frontage of Haven Avenue and a require the - applicant to amderground the electrical and tel ecoiVuni cation lines along the Eighth Street frontage at their expense. D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant *adverse environmental impact as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with these ? findings, issuance of a Negative .eclaration would be in order s following the CUP hearing. i IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue this item so that public hearing for the CUP can will be set for April 9, 1986. :.- Res ctfully sut, tted i Brad Buller �F City Planner BB :NF :ko PLANNING COMMISSION STt— REPORT DR 85 -45 - AJA i March 26, 1986 Page 4 Attachments, Exhibit ".A" - Location Map Exhibit i" - Site ktiIization Map Exhibit 6C" - Detail Site Plan Exh •,)ii "D" - Conceptual Grading Plat Exhibftc "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exr'n t "F " - Elevations Exhibit "G" - Parking Calculations Initial Stud-;r, Part H } m 1" CIRCULAT 1 120' RAW. 100' R.O.W. _ 88' or les i R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE Existing ` ++- + ++• Propos €d TRAILS /ROUTES 0 0 0 3 Pedestrian r g a e e e Bicycle ci0 Regional i MUN -Use •` ^ Special Streetscape/ Landscaping _ Power Line/ Utility Easement -• Creeks & Channels s t n Bridge Access !dints 1Pcrk i ^ (�> Fire Station �� ARE& 00 Y 9 4001800 16l'.0 i 4 Lij 2 i" NURIT-I - CM." OF I. ` _ r _� RAti=LLTCA D*ICNGA P,,C. Agenda Packet Page. of 8 l 1� 3 ! RI pWSTRUL Sif"PPM AYlM4RA W= FS AT.11YM • I � iltl ti11FEi GtOaEElR . 1 Gajem NWSTR& 1 I p8R15TfpALPMK Till � "c7 j �GElF}1f1pCJSTi:I':. t ' NORTH CM LTEVI: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'd'ITt�: PLANNING DIVNION EXHIBTI'a:_ SOAI.E3 err ee ,i vi ad _ t p ST" STAEET EASVOEN7 a.•n ieoo b' + - TEMPO EASEM nr / t j I C o .. 1-jT�o 1 �A+ �d..t•e' -f f.nd.y°' `� , A r 1 A B ' 11 • t0• 1 j �. 0 11 ( ti «id feu . r � � .W'_._. �. d '•3. i j• ne.�Ay hn' �° F I � sgrct } of wl ° \, i 1 ° I \` 6 __A AIM IN0, �� IIC�E t7tufl f' ,rtl�r�e� out -0 r f l Z AK C7 • ; � s Q 4 �� ( ELrMrn1�'�E AYa EA6EMENF S , t7/^ M-7 ACACIA STREET ° TA6uLATroN USE SIZE _ PAAKINO A OFFICE 2f.000 EC.FT p601250) C AFFICE 36.000 60.FT. 162'11250) •r• • C RAIN 23,610 90.FT. 60,11400) I a IND /w 11.366 60. FT. 36 01x00) 100.226 30. FT. 7'6rti 360 TOTAL 113 OOMFACT 2.1S I V • SITE C:Jp,100 90. FL LANDSCAPE 76,369 60. 17.241E I 1��Ty�n�7 1`OR" 11 1 - CITY OF _ RAN YT'Frti1= _ 1 NTCHO CLTCAMONGA TrrLE ; IM, F i= DIVISIaN EXHIBIT' } a SCALE=--- - �It � a n I � I z O CJ Q Oo E+ L J '77 -1 lie fN CITY OF, RANCHO C X ICAMOTNGA MANNING DfMaN Rom MM NIORTH ITFAM. TITLE- EXMBIT-. SCALE: e PANTED RCLL -UP COCR CONCRETE PANEL f k WEST L f BUII.OINa B ELEVATIONS y , e - ; r v . NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CLTCAIONOA � - _ p� PLANNING MOON : EXHIBrr -. • .S5 SCALE /' . [+ Ao r CONCRETE 41VIAL EMY COL R COLUMN & 5AAD RLACK OUSE CONCRETE EAST BMWING D ELEVAVONS NORTH CITY OF ITEND RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: low PUNNiNG Dwson, E)CHMM t CITY OF RA.ti HO CUCA'iDV h PART II - I:TITIAL ST[IDY { f. *M ENVIRO NTAL CIiECI:LI5T DATE: APPLICANT: >'kJlt f}Src�G ~- FILING DATE:_ /� �:85" LOG NUMBER ftM(W, S' PROJECT:TtJp t�FrCF 13 4i Tc 7.441 , PROJECT LOCATION,_ �o�►7i3tiE�p �1 I. E*IVIRO:,MNTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required sheets). on atta -dad YES MAiBE vO 1. Soils and GeoloRZ. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions,. displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? C. ,Chat.2 in topography-or ground surface cotitour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification Of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water y erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? - f• Changer in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologiq -' hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud_ slides, ;*round failure, orb similar hazards? f y h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use 4: of any mineral resource? " 2. Aydr, oloQV, Will the proposal have significant 1 results in: r Page 2 YES MAYBE 1d a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes In absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c- Alterations to the course or flo-, of flood waters? d• Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? ` / e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? V g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct auditions or with - drawals, or through interference with aquifer? an Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? I- Fxposure of people or property to Water related hazards such as flooding _ or seiches? 3. Air Qual�ty. Will the proposal have significant results in: , Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? ✓ b. deterioration of ambient air quality and /or = nterference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results Tn. a. Change in the characteristics of species, rr, including diversity, distribution, or number ;. of any species of plants? b. Rediiction of the numbers of any unique t£r' or endangered species of plants?y 4 ,rare 'age 3 1 YES }{GYBE VO c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area ?, ✓' d. Reduction in the potential for vgricultural production? 1r Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of / animals into an area, or result in .a barrier J to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or remov. ^1 of existing fish or _ / wildlife habitat? 5- Population. _ _ _ Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- ® bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? I b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create _ a demand for additional housing? 6- b.tio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have sir ^ ?ficant results in: .�. Change iu local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax .rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed d� among project benericiaries, i.e., buyers, f tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Plannine Considerations, Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, i Policies, or adop_ad plans of any governmental entities? / 1/ c. An Impact upon the qulaity or quantity of ,F existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? Page 4 j `J u , e. Increase in existing noise levels? s f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous ,. noise levels? S• The creation of objectionable odors? h, An increase ire light or glare? LIN M ;, x YES 'tAyBE NO 8. Transportation. Will the proposal, have significant Cesuits in° , a. Generation of ,substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? V VI' c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand f for new parking? d- Substantz3l impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? ✓. e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion o or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water - borne, rail, mass transit or f f air traffic? f f g. Increases in traffic hazards to Rotor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? . .� 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integ -ity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? f f O. Healy-, Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the — — proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of peuple to potential health hazards? c, A risk of explosion or release of hazardous f substances in the event of an accident? y f d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such j j u , e. Increase in existing noise levels? s f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous ,. noise levels? S• The creation of objectionable odors? h, An increase ire light or glare? LIN M ;, x r Page 5 YES lmyn NO 11. Aesthetics .' Will the proposal have significant re.,u >es in a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive s _ V4 c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have i a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the follow: -g: a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communications systems? f d. Water supply? !' e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? f h. Fire protection? ` - -' i. Police protection? f F J. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1- Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? J m. Other governmental services? 13. Eneret and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal _ have significant results int a. Use of substantial or excessii:e fuel or energy? y b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing j sources of energy? � c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumptirh _ of non- renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewabl' sources of energy are available? ; Page YES No e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce naturL,1 resource? 14. Ma 11 _ndatOMLLindinAa_Rf SiRlificance. a. Does the project have zhe Potential to degrade the guality of the environment, substantially reduce the habit-_.!- of fish or wildlife cpec_tns, cause a fish or wilelife Population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered Plant or animal or eliminate -important examples of the m.-ior periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the Pot,�.,ntial to achieve short-term, to the disadvaw-age'if long-tem, environmental goals? (A ,nort-tFrm impact on thu environment is one which occurs In a relaciva.-y brief, defire-tive period of time while long- term impacts Jil� endu,*e well into the future). c. Does the project �'--ave impacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individaal project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future Projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effectz ,on human beings,,either directly.or indirectly? DISCUSS'TnM Av EVALUATION (i.e., of affi ive,answers -Dove quPstions Plus a aiscussion of proposed mitirmat gation to Mearures,'. ,f Pafi III. DETERA NATO, *.7 On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environae.y, and,a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ' I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation, measures l described en an attached sheet have been added to the project. A r NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE ?REPARED, t ❑ I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect or' the eavirnment, anA y an ENVIRONQSNT L`D?ACT REPORT is required.. / Date` / S gat. �a s F Title F f � } a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION 07 THE RANCHO CUCAMONPA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -45 FOR TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS Arlo 2 MULTI- 'IENANT INIJSTRIAL BUILDINGS ',OCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND ACACIA STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT AND HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRIr" WHEREAS, on the 12th day of December, 1985, ,•complete application was filed by Aja & Associates for the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 26th day of March, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project and continued to the April 9, 1986 regular meting; and WHEREAS, on the 9th day of April, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning commission held a public hoaring to consider the above described project and t inued to the May 14, 1986 regular meeting; ands WHEREAS, on the 14th day of May, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning is-ion held a meeting to consider the above described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and Haven Avenue Overlay District; and. 4. That the proposed 'se, together wiith the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the j vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a !Negative 9eclarat•ion is issued on May 14, 1986. SECTION 3: That Development Review 85 -45 is approved subject to the �° following conditions and attached Standard C:•nditions Aft PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION DR 85 -45 - AJA May 14, 1986 Page 2 Planning Division• 1. Any proposed roof mounted equipment shall be acreened and the design shall be architecturally integrated with the elevations. Detail plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to .issuance of building permits. 2. A combined monument /project ientification sign shall be provided at -the- northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street. The design ' of such sign shall be consistent with the southerly approved project (DR 84 -51) and the Haven. Avenue Overlay District requirements. Sign permit application shall ba submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building pey- mils.. 3. Specie; landscap ng trailtment shall b,i provided along Acacia Street witnin the -,and parking area adjacent to Acacia Sure£ to mitigate the loss of tree planting within kne Metropolitan :Dater District easement. Tserefore, extensive tree planting shall be provided between the easement and Buildings !'A" and "D ". The easement itself shall be planted 'with shallow rooted trees, shrubs, and groundcover. A continuous. hedgerow shall be planted to screen the parking areas from Haven Avenue and Acacia Street. Berming shall be provided along Haven Avenue and Acacia Street with an average height of three feet and a maximuN slope not to exceed 3- 1/2 feet within the MetropcIi4an Water District easement < Approval from the Metropolitan Water District of the detail landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to City's approval of the landscape and irrigation plans and prior to issuance of building permits. 0 4. Pedestrian oriented facilities such as shaded seating areas with attractive landscaping, fountains, kiosk, benches, trash f receptacles and other street furniture shall be provided within the ceaitralized plaza area. Detail plans shall be included in the landscape and irrigation plans and to be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance building permits. of 5. Full material samples of the texturized material ° within the plaza area shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance building permits. of k K-3t n'. Im '1 ti " PLn►iING .COMMISSION RESOLUTION OR 85 -45 - AJA May 14, 1986 Page '3 6. Greater roof height variation for Building B shall be provided. Revised plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to submitting for plan check. 7. ".he southeast corner of Building D shall be cut off to ,lair out the landscaping at the project entrance as shown in Exhibit "C ". Revised elevations for Building D' shall be submitted to City Plznnner for review and approval prior to submitting for plan check. 8. The southeast corner- of Building C and the northeast corner of Building D shall be cut off to flair out the landscaping as shown in Exhibit "C ". Revised elevations submitted for City Planner review and approval prior, to submitting for plan check. 9. Two parking spaces adjacent to the landscape setback located at the most easterly project entrance shall b^ eliminated for providing stacking distance as shown in Exhibit "C ". 10. Large landscape planters and pedestrian walkways shall be provided within the row of parking spaces at the curve of the driveway across from the southern tip of Building B as shown in Exhibit "C ". Engineering 1. The driveway locations along Acacia Street shall align with the development to the south. 2. Underground Utilities: A) Haven Avenue - The opposing side of Haven Avenue exist 66 KV electrical, less than 66 KV electrical and telecommunication lines. Thn applicant shall pay, prior to building permit issuance, a fee in- lieu of undergrounding the telecommunication 4s Tines. Said Fee shall be one -half of the front foot cost of undergrounding as established by City Council. B) Eighth Street Easement - Existing telecommunication and electrical lines less than 66 KV adjacent to the parcel fronting Eighth Street Easement shall be placed underground from Haven Avenue to the first pole east of the easterly property line prior to issuance of an occupancy perm: 3. Notice of Intention to join tha proposed Median Island 'Landscape Maintenance District shall be filed with the . City Council prior to issuance of building permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION DR 85 -45 - AJA May 14, 1986 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH PAY OF MAYS 1986. t PLANNING'COMMISSION ')F THE CITY OF RAUCHO CUCAMONGA r BY: ; Dennis L. Stout, Chairman k _ ATTEST: i Brad Bz.11er, Deputy Secretary 1, Brad Buller,, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of. the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and a6a,it^d by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission' held on the 14th day of May, 1985. by the following vote-to-wit: C AYES: COMMISSIONERS:. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: t i i ,f !k l� G br+ c Nc` °cNS� y �. O•i ^rte E i p a qtg n° €' E? L'p j • • E mss• Y lU nem c2n «E T�.b N 0.mys�- «vim q. nU Z `.n CVO a'd•U n A q.W G NYC n �O�g 4-p E p Q) UJ •O N O U C � L E C N9 d _ #CY d� D.N 9�LO r... EC C°pq 3LW all �E. rr+ � _ vE ° COL N- OO c> qrJ «a € °OYE EIG Y L Em 9 qG q GC G Qr g N E C.r Wa dy C 7U L N' 6 q �. 6r� >� C. .E d. �E.r NL4•V.9'G y i V T - N NLO OLq�IU� 6r YA6Q S.NLg2 C. E d fOkaCN d 6�6m .� C Ou L p m \ Q N G C W a° y �. O•i ^rte E i p q' hS. j • • L.NNN.V u p 0.,. V u 'M1: - N 0.mys�- «vim q. S .co .qco: » �o cao5 ° o: � d ' C Ji � M C.+d• _ pd a3y dd G1LO L U q i V T b CC N=AN N J tiGH Y L p q C4 n ^. Y \ Q N G C W u E nd �VCYYNa=i �.Y .tY6 Y J '.Cr n q q r• «upOi Y' N f6y.nr 6 �uOt «�u�.Y a �O F J N I.1 O Z 4i U GJ 0 S_ CL S Ba a. A «vti gLLU �.aa °r O Y9E01 ° �vb t °e°+ NN R.H. • d. .� r O s Y O ^�r «Y po:NL � « «i s�ci nAY U. C' 31 y NEN�o r e $arm d ++dN YYA 9N =.d 3�`y� VT•°n 'MdgN 9 OA G'•Nj NEi v yO�T +jCt'N °o NY pO Lt] '0o T Na'9 • L O Q uFSPc a `u G`E L�q ` q o° cA r coq o °u�y^ uA 8 • L cb u d w.'t .A+V ^•Ni dd.+EO Ldm�L'y d3avY1 n A� VLdu- A« ««M V9 UY V C=i aV N Y. w • CC CC niucL �•#•N •�N C d6 .�.b 4.b . «UAL V1 =>K a VZ C L y N« Y.OVq t1 byA 72 O6 CAru u�N+L+N OG.d�Y YOUG4 Gam. y N t O A O r s E,.-- Ep «, tL M C .. E V Occ ;; C E« 2 G .0 C ,O n }Y� �y. iA 6 a_Ti 0 al�q w°. L F+rC EON 'h Y ru o aa.Y Y-Y o tit. o cEabe �O =y^.�° a °nN °uQ .N.,G�d AV r L Cq Q U� A GdC« i /�.N .A NAA d Y Nyuigi wY «� ^uQNy NUNS •. a ff n" 9 C YY °� L Y L N V d p y>jM'A �L GAO L ;Y b6 A.W �N 6Q�v UC ^NO vpO C.i Abu NZ_ ile NY, q`p GLYU N YN ° •.d =LL d N A A U« A sO 7 w G E a- T d N �, A �> Y Y'D y� L'YN ° L •O• o CAY.V.N U= �Y�.N G 'J Y 9a Y 2ap0 9 s'0 O' NNW 4o J A c b d z a Y C T.G q n 0 8 ti W .95 b° yam ^= A C C9G p6` b.Gt= q C C LL L OTC N= A.GC. bOp. M Y J9L•N yw A� GL y `r O+, O 4CM_a S N9 E O YN > i„•; Y C H t� r N 6 a « d C q GG, � r- , E^ q. «469 e4 .- �u rtLL EY dl A.ZO �d9 ^p C «690 NC i LC Y C 4 L G G 4 ° w M O •f r U d A.°c p. .• O A k Y°. dT J 9aNC • L`„= YV 9 G «M strt �V «PO « «,•..�N pry U~ °N C +�rF tr Y. q T d V N N A A. ��.41 ^ •° « Y V a 6 G G F G O A O p 0 A4N Va> LAL04 2bb C q pAN# VLr TOb O `J b�} q Y 4 N .. OLLG�. O. U CS u U p gid.O... Q 6 �� 0 G r q F >. d.. G L U C r U L« L 6 U L C d U 4 9 U ® Y 6u r p .C." t 6 xc. FL• -.a,. < 0 •°y N G q f. •Gy A C I• p. I EI rC �.?)d Vl Eo o A ✓9 y°O �_ LLy 9 .b do y N b •` N y GY '�quTiy q. t 6 L M •y i 4 ° M a m°'a U L q =i:� °Y - X =� � r Cy �° �A T NLY N ✓ep NL 'Eq €9 w u c « t A b won G� • un „s, d�a � M G.9" ns l r E 'o, 49 c`� a O «�y � ui L a d j G96C„o yM.... LAC =E. CO A E G L I IT G LO a- N Ce s C C� V NLG • CC CC niucL �•#•N •�N C d6 .�.b 4.b . «UAL V1 =>K a VZ C L y N« Y.OVq t1 byA 72 O6 CAru u�N+L+N OG.d�Y YOUG4 Gam. y N t O A O r s E,.-- Ep «, tL M C .. E V Occ ;; C E« 2 G .0 C ,O n }Y� �y. iA 6 a_Ti 0 al�q w°. L F+rC EON 'h Y ru o aa.Y Y-Y o tit. o cEabe �O =y^.�° a °nN °uQ .N.,G�d AV r L Cq Q U� A GdC« i /�.N .A NAA d Y Nyuigi wY «� ^uQNy NUNS •. a ff n" 9 C YY °� L Y L N V d p y>jM'A �L GAO L ;Y b6 A.W �N 6Q�v UC ^NO vpO C.i Abu NZ_ ile NY, q`p GLYU N YN ° •.d =LL d N A A U« A sO 7 w G E a- T d N �, A �> Y Y'D y� L'YN ° L •O• o CAY.V.N U= �Y�.N G 'J Y 9a Y 2ap0 9 s'0 O' NNW 4o J A c b d z a Y C T.G q n 0 8 ti W .95 b° yam ^= A C C9G p6` b.Gt= q C C LL L OTC N= A.GC. bOp. M Y J9L•N yw A� GL y `r O+, O 4CM_a S N9 E O YN > i„•; Y C H t� r N 6 a « d C q GG, � r- , E^ q. «469 e4 .- �u rtLL EY dl A.ZO �d9 ^p C «690 NC i LC Y C 4 L G G 4 ° w M O •f r U d A.°c p. .• O A k Y°. dT J 9aNC • L`„= YV 9 G «M strt �V «PO « «,•..�N pry U~ °N C +�rF tr Y. q T d V N N A A. ��.41 ^ •° « Y V a 6 G G F G O A O p 0 A4N Va> LAL04 2bb C q pAN# VLr TOb O `J b�} q Y 4 N .. OLLG�. O. U CS u U p gid.O... Q 6 �� 0 G r q F >. d.. G L U C r U L« L 6 U L C d U 4 9 U ® Y 6u r p .C." t 6 xc. FL• -.a,. < 0 •°y N G q f. •Gy A C I• p. I EI Ell 11 AA { m C. ^d v yY Et V V p% 0 � N c Vii. q2 OO O E i r0 i6c N ti� do O^ ��'q m�u TL c�y�o z L c9Y N9 d oN Tatio9i mY "O m .op c cR .c � �. L �d0' 9•.^ ` R� S Va N,p V.CdaNC T. ,{,� N�O1 SL. NON > rRWnMNp` aL+CL fU 'O . .. °� .°. N o a R aa.u.- �° a Na .•.0 f1 c x �� N. EL- � N p •D a d E '�G GNd! La=+C L� _�� R� O1G V� � d�C��i -•�LO uq<' a''L Q�.Tn O mop yg.R YC o N� P.�R.••.Q,Np 6�D1y u° c e, i� A �Y O 6� N •= E y RLt 'I,..��1 r,.�q nL0 dl]Eb NC y 9Y. UH'�Y o. o•-. c R o y ' L ��°. Aw L Ec DN I 3C x i da D v i O.dG .. d _ p c+aT dTyy bQ v: 9 Ed1 NR N 6 N� 4vni '3HO ): »c ¢ir u•R- .R-rn >rn ao 4 R�oi 6u 1�0 �G» tinu a'm v°� m �' •.- gaoc °1c rno .° ^L>. .m.�. °adv N� .. TE} sacc LNdc G iY as o�c„ c r 1dR r «d OC p��.+ C uN C ?� O � u aE• c m R L p L Z n c O .r T n �« 9 L d V ' OL« •9-0> d�j�9 C LE Dc al qm N NS dT °D OWN uNi�r r�C Lnsc L i^ c uti °u 9 e �dc o� �^ Fdw }a .^- u N�6 mar Ha V�.N y Yiq 9 Np A Ly 4Yn rn o•naw CC CE =S yNtY 7E[J � «y ry adi�e-c os t Ra V L �NaN Q V 4c� 2> W gal V cedar 9^NFiy- R9y «t°i:.COV Eud �dRy Y G�O° d L Y «� rr R° aT Y�oR �•N.- iq9 LO E L., 6N —is RRD 9 t r R +-q E L pLR V .•N•. d «D ,c R NY .E AU R g:5 . w T NVr° ^al ..BZ dV O. CAA° V 9 Y9. y c N bE OCy ^V nc^ RoN u:, O� Vi� 'd R.a�'a '^ L D 4• ^LLD L �� °.. —°^.N. yas + >. Do ^ E° Y L 6. ^ ^_ ^ m L -O R N u l •^.° t v.NO 4R.rm } y L C> L 6 49» !-6N 6ti. 6V i5 .24 C R .*a 2L <nGR G L W6 pr.Gi a°i y°, \ \\ bl V �+ K"', ''� I'� A. �W �N� � ' k•. I� Ir� IN ^•!�; +93 Tn1 3' Nn6 C9} Y >aY >' .}. elf l^0=i � rW SjN +� N9• a° r dN A ° CON FS ?�IpO OA� �� ON �a°lt mi>p a°lJ 9• �� 3-�0 �6tr � l p �m . �atYN�°w °� n °N ?3• � � oE� 'a oD mnn`ar n d p >° oy. -v.Y -• n�NO v2S n'lC bhp^ SY' � Sy>j,O N da.� ^N� a ^ +�O -.•-°w 31. �y<3 Crmi iNr naNar. no pr l. r ^l ^°rN> ,° �e r ^S NO^ R n,y9N < °an r a °nom l9n bN >d�6° alAw N LO l• 'o-odo �< l�^ lon~ .. O, r3 ^v -•Vm ZC 70 •i < T�, a ° G ZS Ny�11 ac �.^.. °O '°I • ^. 6` DON ..9 rAOY .T ;;57 �O d a 0AZ •in o, -"i moo N �N <.s•w ^mz n loco 'c^ Jr > °n o Y d 4n >u > +e. APO n;o� �x lldN� ° n. c 'a 't 4 ~ S 9 • • Pf'1a O•'n �; 1A ^1Pa �; N•��S ° O d.S 'NTIaC a��. -1 na n�rr dD 3 v r nOc J �F Nd;l OrD �+l Yl. y H 1R9 1,pC11 YRaN ao a N N ry a • T .N. °. � > ;o t•�n4 N4 N r NN ^33H Nr)•rw? R1 73 y�µN e0in n cr o �� 9Or>Y 33 y 1. Oi N ' q^ ism iaPC N �O . G r ;D ng ^� <03 mT ^° can n sr..a� ao .N.si os F. oi- ° o°o 'd°? ac n r9 o� o m.a. _ a�. Sr• •. T�Y.O� r r W--- rd� O� 00 D Y^ ^ O O 6 y Y A ,., �o zic °nom r ("1• 6 .NE �.^ > TnCd m ��� N 31N6 ^R�p. ^CN vZ 0.3y. O OR l"1 ^^ DrY NZ A A.dK ° OA7 G! ~Nr �TnC C 330 �+ r`C Y • A Ask u >n :°minion.: �e a°no cac. A- 'S 0 V. n c+ N. Rm1 b y _YO� Ay s = a o Net y A LAC Z d 0 �'I y 3 C` w �. 2 .I.I c O y d u L �+ ° •J dJ A4E u wr< 30. Y L Y^n N bo U .raj r ELF r n ao ' L LOI e. o'^ °I 6qL 0 0 � o V oV° Ya `. A N w E b L�.0 N LYC� 9 .2 �' Y q�pc �y 3 r� N C O N «c CCp «d ny�l u1 q.OaU C w °a ao T °A Ay u c ° AL SOr ^ 990 LLOQy Z;.5 gg ¢ 40i°lO ? OIA C .°q !° c L 9aby GN AS E n Y rG C T•-• ^ i Ldt G'L ° m N b .^S—'u n C' L'p nM1^ OB b Y OO�IJ OF U9 Q�- ppVn .]a•C. i�� QV� cuO�' WI � • ' bd LC 'T Y°IY b P y y 010 �. R. N L n ab b N.•� M.2— cTS L- `h u m c G duY ± « .•. ° q 0 6 =v�eLi p d a d y m 6 A °b C� cO V UIZ� .2 Yti d' C Lb C O�•c^T 4+^wl C O9 yu a p a wd�-" L+c-odd -:r Qn �- ^ a a a _ 3. o G Y o ., a° ^YI OV abd .°- w .°.O „b. q b° L y U t c�yy YU «L .yi.4yyt o bV �� °yE , TA eb bL } V YY VN qy w9yyN Y« eqq~ �n LOab COLLE% E.^ ^1r Ay 0�6c VO L Eo + d ay « Cam. .°•i� qu. LoLAm EFf n.N. crL, ^• ^.° pti q u a.°.. ai r a 'c L V °f' ° N A Up b d L w i b••• yO ^OI °T >m ° p I.N. bC�MO. 1]yb. NM a. ow '� L� yE'to YA OIL Y u aY. a. q VC aoLN Y Y Y�+ aFN mL w TN ^ u Op UTZ YN nb t .. WNb W.4L°I ga tLDA63 Y Iw M. Hp S d V • � ate" y �� °= .°. g L. Y O• r O D. g �i�LU NCO° O•U U L W • < < c 4Cl d d. M d V GGGe ► t U w L V—' N O � � gip' � .0 ° v o•` ..+•,ci u✓ Q'c0 u s N u� d T u tY a_Ta 6Y � Y u N 6 `• x q q � p� •°• Cv NN y NN O uoaJ v .�.. c w N.�v �.:•°� Lu E v� N.E UiaLi.^ °d •cv ma. €aN. v' adp d NY 'a +c ^a N '• J °a�A'.r G2K a�L 6u LO O � ev �R yo ce O�'.M u 9U NUpOI -^ 0 CW E N uy ,�„Va. U. n ~c�L VZN OJLi p< L. Y•^ ^' �a c uy a L.. NV I 9 oad. a ^`o. '^vq° Nv a N =a � •-oss ° . =Fuo `•- •+ L II ov 6ndEu U�?f.0 �j9�U AL '^N�• Ni � L � uZC G p !• Otd �N UgO.� SY1'N yTN U.w°. .L L Y asS °• L lags by° 15 d Lx uu�o iqa� wssan �r ^ ° � 3 x L C w C C u Y T^ �. mTuV °a eCCa J L 9 W Ta<i Z NG562 63 «.M NOUN a: ai 6.� Wu NL LLI �l • � ate" y �� °= .°. g L. Y O• r O D. g �i�LU D '� v•i• n s 2Y s < c 4Cl d 2 N `v V GGGe ► t J ° N �J �• c Le. au � gip' S dq I {A L T ° u NM co Q'c0 u s N Ana T u tY u u++ 6Y V d �j 0 u< x q iO' ° p'm =� p� •°• Cv NN Y.tl q NN v .�.. c w N.�v �.:•°� Lu E v� N.E O. q < NIN u�v 0 0. ) i ov° < C s s YE t GGGe ► t J ° N �J �• Y S dq I {A L T ° u y 6 O Q'c0 u s N N c r r U a Q a W u�v 0 0. ) O Z 41 U d •n O d r E tl r T 9 q T qu L D q L u L 4 A 6 a+q T= 9 n .`•. a o ^Sc cp a nc o a •-u '0 o u N L V n .'Ju �tl � wc4 Lt. ov dN, 4u. i a�i c ••• 9 Oy • xY �~ '�L w. a•� CST Fi� � c L4A 42S M Lug ~a • �p U LNG w•O4C. K— 07 G�v1 4`^� �► � NI LAI 0 4 u 9 q Y a A Y hN N N V S ° o• ` 4 � M T � ui i �• LY �u o� v. uY ° u$ E � ate. Y4g W i v qo �Y 4 m SY tlI _ tlw 4I Y N rl a u Lt� n N ^L N^ M 4a o9 M q O L Nom^ L N $v� a 4uu •^ q °c NL 01� 4\ C 01 C Y Q Z W Y� w O.•. Y d —It^ C = �utV» LO Ltl C � r Y pT t u� a wCiN} 0 Yu d CL o" b� tc� gjgy. O b Y L4h� � a FE LHUa 4I L W Y a Q N w u Y M O � L o c y1 = O > r cL cq L O A C �p p 01W 4 y C u p't� Y ou 1 HI O O dam. ^O O L7 Y tl M4 a^ w 49N Lam+ tl � a u 9 • _'• � c Y K M N L 4w Y�L ^ $a f•d 32 w ^ nL V L L b° L y •d � w d f' Y8 d tl OI G Na =oo oG� L' a a � = 4cy a+"a+ o>' v m �c Ey0 w4 N^ ♦. o 2u y of OEM 0 da_ Y N tl CY �� • N °Z: � u �+ 4u V TY. ,RuN p k-1 CwY d pT E i 64 aCY b ° 4 4 4C Y4 b s Ho a °96 tlOY ri-a+ LVB L!4 Y9 9.p �y SY. ptLn � V HI N� 4 u 9 q Y a A Y hN N N V S ° o• ` 4 � M T � ui i �• LY �u o� v. uY ° u$ E � ate. Y4g W i v qo �Y 4 m SY tlI _ tlw 4I Y N rl a u Lt� n N ^L N^ M 4a o9 M q O L Nom^ L N $v� a 4uu •^ q °c NL 01� 4\ C 01 C Y Q Z W Y� w O.•. Y d —It^ C = �utV» LO Ltl C � r Y pT t u� a wCiN} 0 Yu d CL o" b� tc� gjgy. O b Y L4h� � a FE LHUa 4I L W Y a Q N w u Y M O � L o c y1 = O > r cL cq L O A C �p p 01W 4 y C u p't� Y ou 1 HI CW011 eerveD -- y NA^0 N6 D V 3 ON CNCA A.# Pr1/�Y 91986 �.�z,� tiN ..a,t:, 71$l�t14rI2t�,�,�nt�t4 sPbf :.. ., May 8, 1986 VIA EXPRESS MAIL Mr. Dennis Stout Chairman, Planning commission City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91736 R$: Request to Withdraw CUP No. 46 -03 Dear Commissioner Stout: This letter will serve notice that G.N. Utban Company wishes to withdraw CUP Request No. 86 -03 for its development on the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street.. Buildings A & B are now designed for office uses and parked accordingly. The OR &D" Cond$.tional Use Permit is,,-no loncjer neceauavy. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely,. Thomas L. Utman President TLU /Ce tr REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT e 16 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA STAFF REPORT r'�CASfq Cif O F; z May 14, 198E i977 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Bruce Cook, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13054 - THE WILLIAM _-_C resi er.tia tract subdivision of acres within the Victoria Planned Community (Low - Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units p64 acre) into 137 lots located north of the Southern Pacific Railroad and east of the Beer Creek Channel - APN: 202- 211 -13, 38, I. BACKGROUND: On March 27, 1985, the Planning Commission approved t e rea eves opment Plan for the Victoria Groves Village. This Area Plan establishes the future land use patterns and circulation system for the Groves Villagt;. On November 13, 1985, the Commission approved Tentative Tract 13022. This ma? subdivides the Victoria Groves into 275 individual single- famil,, parcels currently under development, with the remaining areas bell, subdivided into larger parcels for future subdivision per the Vic- ,.oria Groves Area Development Plan for future subdivision. Tentative Tract 13059 would subdivide Lot 273 of Tentative. Tract 13022 into 137 single family lots. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map and conceptual grading pan for 137 single - family lots. B. Project Density: 5.30 dwelling units per acre.. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) (Tentative Tract 13058) and school /park site within the Victoria Planned Community. South - Railroad and Vacant;, City park per the Terra Vista Planned Community. East - Vacant; Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) ( TOntative Tract 13022), and school /park site within the Victoria Planned Coiehunity. West - Vacant; Deer Creek Cilannel, and Low Residential (2 4 du /ac) (Tract 116f6). ITEM . I� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 14, 1986 TT 13059 - The William Lyon Co. Page 2 D. General Plan Designations Project Site - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). North - Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac); Medium Residential (4-14 du /ac ). South - Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). East - Low-Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac); proposed elementary school site; proposed: park siti. West - Flood Control; Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). E. Site Characteristics: The Victoria Groves Village is predominantly vacant and void of any significant land forms or vegetation, save for a grove of mature Pepper trees. This grove was to be preserved as the major element of the Groves Park at the terminus of Victoria Park Lane. No structures or improvements currently exist. The proposed tract is bordered to the south by the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way and to the west by the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel Within this area, the property slopes to the southwest at approximately a 2% grade. III. ANALYSIS• A. General: 137 dots are proposed. The land use designation is ow- a Uum Residential (4 -8 du /ac), with the designated minimum lot size being 5,000 square feet. The approved design for the Area Development Plan s1r3ws a major north -south spine street with lots rearing on the school /park site (see Exhibit "8"). The subdivision design has been revised to eiiminate a tier of lots abutting the westerly and southerly perimters of the park site for the purpose of enlarging 0o school site to meet the needs of the Alta Loma Schoo'i District. Floyd Stork of the Alta Loma School District has submitted a letter indicating that this new design is acceptable to the School District (see attached exhibit). The subdivision design is 'essentially consistent with the approred Area Development Plan. This tract is being planned for subdivision only; new unit development is being considered at t:ais time. The applicant intends to grade these tracts, improx_.streets, and sell "padded lots" to another developer. Per Ordinance requi,ements, building permits could not 'be Issued for any unit development until such time as this project has been resubmitted to the Planning Commission for review and approval per the Design Review process. • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 14, 1986 TT 1309 - The William Lyon Co. Page 3 B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review. Committee has reviewed the project and has recommended approval. With their initial review of the project, the Committee determined that because the slopes along the southern tract perimeter on the railroad property would be visible from the adjacent City Park, these slopes should be landscaped. The Committee has approved a landscaping design scheme incorporating the use of decorative ground cover on the slopes with tree plantings =along the top of the slope adjacent to the perimeter block wall. This block wall is to be of the same design as the perimeter wall on Highland Avenue, and is to be staggered with tree well insets., Windrow style tree plantings will occur along the entire dimension on the property side of the block wall, with accent trees being planted on the slot de of the wall within the provided tree well insets. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project an ^ ermined that, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with all applicable Standards and Ordinances. The easements obtained by the Lyon Co. from the railroad related to the slopes are for grading only, no right has been granted by the railroad to either plant on their property or to permit access onto their property for landscape maintenance. A Condition of Approval is included requiring the Lyon Cu, to obtain these additional rights from the railroad before the map can record. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been ctimpleted y the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. A copy of Part 11 of the Environmental Checklist is attached for your review and consideration. IV.- FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Victoria Planned cmmuni y and the General Plan. The project wail not he " detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, together with the recommended Conditions of ,Approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Vicioria Planned Community, the Development Code, and City Standards. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in Tne Daily _ Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300' of the project site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 14, 1986 TT 13059 - The William Lyon Co. Page 4 Ask VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve is project through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, r Brad Buller City Planner BB:BC•das Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location 4ap Exhibit "B" - Area Development Plan Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract 13022' (Master Plan of Subdivision) Exhibit "D" - Tentative Tract Map /Grading Plan Letter from Floyd Stork of Alta Loma_Schooi District Initial Study Part, 1I Resorption of Approval with Conditions Ask - ha 4. ' 11 ;1 ? 1f S- OUCNIM 714L �� 57`• `NL I Vi ' Vr 7 �.1 of L_Aw-� o 0 Zz. Zzo�, �uu a c It r71 w w � 0 w w 6 U O LL -- F F F F -- - --- ! t 1 M Lo Ep xxx � Lu W Lu uj 1 � E r ! m m _ I` N w z lI I iia a a& • � s ! w wn < wd OS _ �� N S 129 l61 \Gp a� U U U •. :5 ! amsicw N UJ Wmmmmm x x x x X Q w Lu Lu W } . CITY Or. 1R•.AINCHO CUCANL -IO \'O �riTLE. PLANNING DIVISION F-Xl ilBIT - SCALE =.- a L —5 cw7riBoXwn `N�'''x~:`zt7Ji*ax�r'� A. •• . � �Nert-o-co,�.alNlnr ems ,` •at �,,�,:. � "� -. IKitAM � \ENE ESC: > 1[1r -�• t. _ �� `Tee :�% � �� .•1 ^�` :�st t� ncrmuj� �..n pE3pBlitS{, - Jill ? t NMIE 1. •'R�� � ,..Rrtta i -♦ �AE3CEIIE .•r � 1...- �' J .✓.:tilt ' pAtFC? 0.LLAOAD _ • •RANCHO CUCA, jpA 0016W NTYPARK sourN AEpIN ODdn . <''�i• t _ tt . ! •..T E• -�. 11 J•. L ..r. cvcr.R.Fkrti Iffflam TENTATIVE TRACT NQ. 13059 TENTATNE TRACT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �—i SOUNDARY NO -MMSER 18, 1885 600' PERIMETER ZONE SITE UTILIZATION MAP ei VICTORIA THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY INC. CITY OF T RANCHO CLrCA1 OTNGA Tom: PUNNUNC L1iSTj'S`I:ON EXHIBIT . SC:r1I E _.. AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN VICTORIA GROVES Rancho Cucamonga, Ga LS'ON (�aro+uemrrs�t,vc(:a�o�tfr r LAND USE LEGEND •AND UNIT TABULATION /; , r VELAM eue+eea,a COM PHASE I e(l — �i • " .e A •.1 II °YSO.+otimr n.ea ee I rr,,Ir DO." Lon low•�Fan((abam at. »AC 214? le'S 'ai au,a r", - .._�'1 �'. '4' ^ `� ars•a•++r oo�i+ � � za av,c �j _ ,�••�, PHASE 11 `n atx:,rovs�. ` F' Tor" M. t PHASE 0 / ( �rsra..,a --•"yi t� {.� f r�1� ' FvlF M (amY�d �vft` 1i ?• ,1 .i' l�+cj, �i \.I ?i. r� sa•oa sue I p, _LM/morm f e.. i-- , r Ji �, • ' -`/� —f il�' �:' �,Jt77��ii � a ry �/J � � � 1.1 1 :- t t � t i a�,.i `' a `mac 1 �• tr I. i t�i " � I 1• tip / �( ` I.� -� .. � : y S 1 t _ �,t�.•' .•° � ' Iir �'' i � �1'_ �, `,ham_ / .., f ,1 j • ��' t t•1 • 'tip r` Y� // � � � i -1 1 1' t • _� �-� � .Y""� 1 f - }� av p - \ {�w..os. � � ya � isj� L. �xo a a. "�-'._ r• _- - K..._•� CITY��at+iV ify�� �i � Nia°°.ro.e• RANCHO GLC� � IO \Gt� TITLE. tz PLANNING DIVISION EYI IIrlT. " n SCALE: __- _____- a. L--7 EI 1 t i a�lil !` -�t6 e+ it >> i`lari —t — ' !s1!11 �e.FS0 /III Y•S t I t i t -] r It Wl l t p' ; a' c � ?I .� i' }.� ' �: » � • •� ° • Wit. , �1 ' �, sF• +t`- � ,s y 1. .fit +t Y+ '�' tt ji .. '(� ttt .'i( ' �t;f' `,� j 't ( t'�" f Lt,� t r' �`�� � 1 F �• I (• '12 4•t•r �t l .r ���..+ir r�. til? . -1. •.nli•�. .Q—» .t�y- .�1��"7T(' FI Q � , •� r r; 1 � ' 1 .6� S.: E i a t^ 6< n la + f t ;�° � f j !t. �• (' d`�. 1 � -.te X31 ,'�� �, i t iL'�+!.••' r J , ( - I i•t •.r .r�g � •(- gyp' j i, i Y •� I i1' 6 '� t F� Yt + t •Y %'8 YY �� Y �et �:'Yt• �� i y•L � B 22 1 Iy •'I �� t �• t� ! r Y Oh ° - Ito 14 PLANNING DIVISION TITLE: „. EXfilpIT: SOLE: -- - ---1�� � " " d, AnLol20 ORL n n SU0. v iva. s xaw ��,� . _.w•..'�•r'•w.."w'. w ..w. 3uuw.n!» u••°.•• , tt�il�7oJ�rr�o�A 'g7�wybt'tiU4t 3Ft1. S OUD �!'td.i14.iJLOI/ p l f vu. a w�ew,oin�v 6SdEi 'ON!0VUL BMiV1Nal if c 'Ni tgg: t Mi �� iii£ R z' Wit ` 4 {# M1 in 7 s F7n 5E, ct r I �.V t to �� `,-q nKt, I... I list 1� j, Ic IT Ito, unoo -a A'• Iv st IN. 7--f Lg T=i 141 if L-ID r: R J 1-1 M sI n —_ ,� +r z .•SSE }�--.. _ 3¢ .s 'r' .4 "= : i z }i '-t. .. I S f• � r 1 ,:� n"1, a ol V d t ~ Y f P71, � IZ r j1 LJP I I 01 U. Z 0. n, till! i" 5 CC Ilk 41 f P71, � IZ r j1 LJP I I 01 U. Z 0. n, till! f P71, � IZ r j1 LJP I I 01 U. Z 0. n, F" " Alta Loma School Distfici 9350-F Baseline Road # Post Office Box 370 • Alta 1-0ma, Callfomda 91701 ♦ 7141587.0766 JOHN E. WMURMY SuperinftdEnt DEAN q ENFIELD PtWitntmPU'Person"I Oburving 100 Years ofd Ialinl children MLLYSMIN Cwriculum/special Pmift-M December 12, 1985 SrACY NELSON BU.VMU Services William Lyon Company 8540 Archibald Cucamonga, California 91730 Gentlemen: On October 21, 1985, a meeting was held in the office of Jack Lam, Director of the Community Development Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. At that meeting, it was agreed that the grove of native pepper trees in question would remain and, jn turn, the Williacn Lyon Company agreed to make additional land available to the Alta Loma School District. Subsequent to this meeting, the Lyon Company submitted a map incorporating the agreements reached at the meeting. This is to inform you that the Alta Loma School' District accepts ciAs proposal as satisfying our requirements for an adequate elementary school site. Very truly yours, Floyd M. Stork Building Consultant jh BOARD OF TRUSTEES R CE 17L V11"Aa MEG 17 1985, THE WILLIAM LV SAWBERNARDIN l DIVIS", PITY OF P4NC'iO CUCAMONGA PART IT IYITIr'. STUDY ENVIRON:fE TAL CHECKLIST DATE; Md 6 h A APPLiCArr- "'t 1� I.I J_tA f FILING DATE; Lj&,,�� LOG NUMBER: - PROJECT LOCATION: 4111, I. E- IROI ?SE tT�L i2II9ACTS i (Explanation of all "yes." and "mayb," answers are required on attached sheets), p 1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have YES MAYBE NO significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changer in • geologic relationship? s b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? C- ,Change in topography or ground surface �^ contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical feature:? e. Any pc.tential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affe_tiug either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltaticn, or deposition2 8• Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such _ as earthquakes, landslides, mud - slides, ground failure, or'similar �- ' hazards? h. An increase in the rate of a „traction and /or use of anf mineral resource? 2. HYdrolo�; W ;ii the proposal have significant results in r, . r t page 7 --� results in: a proposal have significant YES 11AYSE \o a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, ~ b. 'Deterioration of asbient air quality and /or channels? or ephemeral stream Interference with the attainment of apr;:Lcable b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage C. Alteration of local or regional climatic patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? conditions, affecting air movement, moisture c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood $. Biota craters? Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: d. Mange in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality ?' f. Alteraclon of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or I with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise ava, -,le for public water suPPlies7 I- Exposure of people or property to water related hazards stNh as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Quality. Will th --� results in: a proposal have significant a. Constant or periodic .Air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary gources? b. 'Deterioration of asbient air quality and /or Interference with the attainment of apr;:Lcable air quality standards? C. Alteration of local or regional climatic ^- conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? $. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: AMh a• Change in the characteristics of species, ~' Including diversity, distribution, or number { of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any or endang(1ed species of plants? q ue +tare " Faze 3 y_g TgaYBE `o c. Introduction of new or disruptive species. of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal' have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics ol species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of ar.imals? c. Introduction of new or disr,iptive - %pecies of animals into an area, or result in a. barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. R-terioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? —_ 7 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant -. results in: a•. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution,,density, t diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? a b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, oz, create a demand for additional hl>using? 6. Vocio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significanr results in. a. Change in local or regionF:l socio- economic characteristics, including economic or -° commercial diversity, tax rate, ,,nd property values? b. Will project costs be equitably di:•tributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and rPlanning Considerations. Will the 7 L• G proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or E planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans oc' an, governmental entities? c. :.n impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non- consumptive; recreational opportunities? 7X Page 8. Transportation. Will the Y_S :IAY3r No proposal have signi.icant results in a- Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? C. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parkingi d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and Potential waarer- borne, rail; mass transit or air traffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 4. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. Heal_ th. Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the _ i- proposal have signific4r;r results in: a. Creation of any health hazard jr potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? C; A risk of explosi ,)n or release of hazardous ' substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to Potentially dangerous noise levels? The g. creation of objectionaale odors? h. An increase in light or glare? 1C Pa3e 5 Y =S nTSE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results int a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive 7 site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new sysi,Is, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b. Naturi or packaged gas? C. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? �Xc T 7 i- Police protection? J. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including, -- roads and flood control facilities? M. Other goverr iental services? T 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: ~ a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c.. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the censemption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of ever y are available? _ l -' _:77 ?a.e 5 YES ".,4Y3E NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. Mandatory Findi enifica -IS . a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environa.,nt, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildl$.f�2 species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate i'plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or ennangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short tern 'to the disadvantage of long - term, _'nvironmen ?,al goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but crAmulatively considerable? (Cumulativel,* considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed In connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will causes substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ II. DISCUSSION OF E IRORMENTAL EVALUATION (i.e. the above Questions plus a discussion o, of affirmative answers to f proposed mitigation measures). Ur"1 iM ��r�Ts -TT4% Pico+- t+•A�p l sst- Sly -[.ts IFo&rr ( 1V_ -,1S or -Ate V Gati- ►,ic,.t�.l L= ' i�a-1 '�.J1-S1 -i - �rac�., � f , t '9 Pace 7 yT III. DETr ?�!_ T_NATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the effect environment,,, and a NEGATIVE DECI nRATZD:7 will be prepared. i find that although the proposed project could have !a significant' effect on the environment, there will 'Abt be a sicnilicant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A YEGATIIS DECLARATIO?1 WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project :i4Y have a significant effect on the envirnaene, and E,MIRO:':Lr'vT an IMPACT REPORT is required. ,i Date i Signature Title , 'ry iF RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13059' WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 14o. 13059, hereinafter "Map" submitted by The WilliAm Lyon Company, applicant, for the purpose of sulidividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 25.8 acres within the Victoria Planned Community (Low- Medium Re.isdential-, 4-8 divelling units per acre), located north of the Southern Pacific Railroad and east of the Deer Creek Channel (APN: 202- 211 -13, 38) into 137 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on May 14, 1986; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval ;f the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the. Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows SECT109 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Wntative Tract No. 13059 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems x 7� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION May 14, 1986 TT 13059 - The William Lyon Co. Page 2 (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the._proposed subdivision. (g) That this project wiil not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2 Tentative Tract Map No. 13059, a copy of which 'is attached ereta, 3s hereby approved subject to all of the fd1lowing conditions and ;he attached Standard:Conditions: Planning Division -, 1. Prior to recordation of Tract 13059, all conditions of approval applicable to and imposed upon Tentative j Tract 13022 small be complied with, 'including; but not limited to, the completion of off -site improvements and greenbelt trail areas. 2. Prior to recordation of Tract 13059, the Final Map for Tract 13022 shall be recorded. 3. The greenbelt trail located along the northerly boundary shall be indicated on the final map as Lot B of Tract. 13058. 4. This map is being approved as a Tract Subdivision only. . Any future proposals forte development of five or more residential unit;; shall require Design Review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits for any units. 5. Concurrent with any application for Design Review, the applicant shall also submit an acoustical study detailing what mitigation measures, if any, are required to achieve noise levels, both exterior and interior, consistent with City Standards for lots abutting either Milliken Avenue or the raiiroad right -of- way. 6. Landscape treatments at the erd of side -on cul-de-sacs shall be designed to provide an open view into the interior of the cui- de -s::�, Design treatment shall include the use of decorative wrought iron fencing and sidewalk connections from the sidewalk to the perimeter street. _ r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION May 14, 1986 TT 13059 - The William Lyon Co. Page 3 7. A six foot high masonry wall shall be provided alr,4.� Milliken Avenue and the southerly tract boundary adjacent to the raa'road right-of-way consistent with the approved wall design for Highland Avenuo. These walls sboWd be staggered and offset to -increase visual interest. Tree well insets per the approved conceptual landscape design for the slope planting ifleng the southerly tract perimeter are to be provi ddd.' Landscape maintenance easements will be required where perimeter walls encrmch into private property and are to be dedicated on the Final Map. Final planting of all walls and locations of all landscape easements are to be determined prior to recordation of the final ma,3, B. Five foot high decorative fences will be required along street side lot lines for all lots that dither side-on or rear-on to Vic!Lria Groves Loop Road. In rear-on conditions walls will be of masonry block construction. Ir, situations where street grade is below pad grade resulting in a sloped parkway, fence lines are to be coincident with the top of slope. Landscape maintenance easements will be required where fences encroach onto private lots and are to be dedicated on the Final Map. Final platting of all fences and locations-of all easements are to be determined prior ti recordation of the Final Map. 9. The slcne along the southerly perimeter of the tract is to be landscaped •onsistiZnt with the approved conceptual design employing a decorative ground cover planting on the slope bank, shrub massing, trees and a continuous windrow planting with intermittant node3 of accent trees at the top of slope. Windrow trees on property side of wall to be irrigated by a separate irrigation system, to maintained by that property owner for eac), individual lot. Accent trees and slope planting on"" slopq side of wall to be on an irrigation system for maintenance by the City. Block wall is to be of same design as that approved for Highland Avenue. Construction landscape and irrigation plans detailing the final design of the slope landscape treatment shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to the issuance of any grading permits. Full slope improvements including walls, landscaping and irrigation shall be installed concurrent V-1th pad grading of the tract. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION May 14, '�186 TT 13059 ',-.4e William Lyon Co. Pp,e 4 10. Any retaining walls used, other than those at the tract perimet r adjacent to the Deer Creek Channel, arp to be a maximum of 4' high. A six foot high masonrSo screen wall shall be provided along the westerly tract perimeter adjacent to the Deer Creek Channel. 11. All retaining walls visibl,�6 to the general public, i.e. on the street.;ide of corner side yards and within the frpnt yard, at-e to be constructed of a decr%rative material to the satisfaciton of the City Planner. 12. All —back of lot grade different71s ore to be a maximum of 12'. Engineeri g Division 1. Victoria Groves Loop Road shall be constructer', full width to Highland Avenue with the first phai�e of ' 'parkway development. 5�idewalks and landscaping may be deferred un'I'JI adjacent parcels are developed. 2. The entire width of Victoria Park Lane shall be constructed from the Loop Road to Milliken Avenue with the first phase of development. 3. Milliken Avenue shall be constructed as f th ollowt,�. the first phase of development: A. Portion from Victoria Park Lane to Southern Pacific Railroad: (1) Full improvements for west roadbe.1, (2) Full median with only one opening at the Loop Road, and (3) A minimum 181 wide pavement for the east roadbed. 8. Portion from Southern Pacific Railroad to Base Line Road: (1) Ful'. median (2) A minimun. 181 wide pavement on both sides of the median, A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION May 14, 1986 TT 13059 - The William Lyon Co. Page 5 (3) Drainage control devices such as paved di.t ^.hes, AC berms or curbs shall be installed as approved by the City Engineer. C. Railroad Crossing: (1) Construct full improvements for both roadbeds including medians (except for parkway sidewalks and landscapi..g) for at least 200' on both sides of the railroad. (2) Tha developer shall coordir;,te with the City to hav�_the railroad crossing signal and arms i ns'te 1 ed prior to occupancy to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. D. -he cost of the permanent improvements is excess of the standard one half street improvements adjacent to the tract boundary shall be subject to reimbursement from the City for the adjacent property owners upon development of their property. 4. Storm drain easments as required for cross lot drainage shall'be de_d�cated on the final map. 5. The storm drain master plan for the area shall be �¢ completed and approved prior to recordation of the Final Map. 6. Construct sufficient storm drain facilities to serve each phase of development as required by the City Engineer. The facilities shall be designed to contain Q1.00 within the street or easement „. right -of -way. i is 7. Southern Pacific Railroad Slope Maintenance: Id' A. The applicant shalt obtain from Southern Pacific Rail Road a signed license /agreement for planting and mai ntei.ance of the slope on the r, "'goad easement prior to recordation of = the ma., aks-.1 S. The applicant shall provide adequate vehicular access to the railroad slope mt )ntenance area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION May 14, 1986 TT 13059 - The William Lyon Co. Page 6 'To recordation of the map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY, 1986. PLANNING COMMfSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SY: Dennis ou aixman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I,�Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of tine Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resoiution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th dW-6? stay, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: L. • �VL VV 4'Y..L Y > nw n T L C.4 O ucy_ L N nN Ya G Vw. G udw os s v° o V 6- q g Y y m tT tJ y° F� w=Y y C 4 M N 79 2�Y V A` N L Gd ° p� 5 +O dci Yw.gr, p Z: uAUn nYU°icr ea . L S' VA y S .2 1.T ECaY N F ./ J YBN:- � ....� 'N^'FGCU Y i =a, ~ >°,-. ,A'` Z Yr A «i� -'^Y Cr LUG Orw2WYy �w L �_i. ° B O 6 w S y E w L N° y V °s rc G a c N '-° Y G'� O q G g 9 A f C .� LU dG j. 6 V FF -r `L� L y.YG �-r M A Y.•.. °6 s 6 �j V ygC- p S y LO yV•O Y u o -=i 2-.,: Nc Aq GY ze C� -y9L •'u.°...d. FG .'a.Yw EN ^ Yuyu °o.z L2::! ° N'• �6 Or 41^ ncuw dY OZNLZ� OVA 'OYt CLY w Ow® ` ^cp' �O YY O N m ti W > �n O O F• O u° u ° o ° i W N S r, o O r r N < J O °w 0 c O °u Y Y � Y rY. LL p sj W G 6 J t a Y V t � 1 O yP= H O AY �d~ d N •+ - = X10 J 6 O � < 4 r { N M YI ,I N «aAT"oo > nw n T L C.4 O d a p Z Y nN Ya G Vw. G udw os s v° o ^ y.. o,u 1OOgn —e L�yCW Z- =N'u +O n•° '•OLN + .Utz; G Ny L S' VA y S .2 1.T ECaY N N M YI ,I N e``.+ ". Su`e� o+v.= '•i G .�•c p>.�LO ��u � GYL t,m�u E� u 0 ° � b �^ u 5 2 y t• > y o t� .+ � i w � M V N tJ 2 .. >J,O�n 9i q Ci Mu °9y �� / L.�.y1.G. yCaL,Y Li v02 °O G^ O.O, feI yy Op n A O �6y + 'oaLO,nx GYM id O tiM L r { S M �w0 N`Nti • ' �. w YY° Y °I L i y _ w Y.'T n V C N L` 9 V C w T YYi D ii �n .iyp Yal VY N6p9V S.C..NL yp CSf C O C C�CN LV IOO a a°+WS RVY b LL�2 Vp•�.O NxCOqu1 lK `� L wL/ i L N � ^^ 4> Y�L Yi Ytln 11 pb.w .�.�. C a�704�aGi bcgbO Y O1 G' L N n V' N m y ^> V Ol V O Y n L C V q. l 9 C b. °° Q ✓ N C� y w yF �°. ^O .-. x„��V Yu Dqt• qw d� CSCC V9 .�ug'.`� -.0 `°h yN �+ti•y6 V�t gGQa 9] < Y t `y1 4z 1� w N O.V. Vat'•!. V N 9 C t C y � V i ^. b 9 y V 0 R r. 4 C G A aG. p 0 p � °~ °� 5• b6� °1.0 G ^a w.0 Cep 01'O° � � yi P� O W.O•�G, VY �^� V t•npq'O \.NO �w �+�C OY� 4UV •,,. °y N °u Ta � ^i G NO. Kw °G ° r.NCV K.-p °yiVp a� k Oc u. V �{ ° C }IO �M 6iaY t`CCQyg V ^U>.b LY YG { oo A6 C�`O C qa• C ua YG O4 4 LO 2 r� i.-. y w° CY O" t U 4� ^ °yam O t ]T .� O•`np &y4 yx �LO 4v €NV 4 "w 4g� UY t. N va rOV ,.N =O.Vgv °Y C'QV� n 9 °> �jCy CV V z! 'N C/ bOC� .G..�vN •' ^..:C f Ned �Sw.V i ngL M ..'p....� Q d rTtGf bN'N yYVN j ®d�M ..V.H1 qu .i V�L�Oa mm }.YN • v •y ut tLt� y, � •�� U� T G f i. i ti. � •.. V L' N N L G 4 >1 < 6 Y 7 V J•' t'1 ° Y N w t7 In`pC1 yu r oY._ `S^'4 9uu ^w ^p >YLH� N.JJr ar �Wy aNU 6`. c 4i t4 V c` qr�o. YUy u p� u a. y •`Y uN4 N .0 N� 9OEpU `la�°N CN���� tN� iC yT. ,4t 0'.a •Oipp +n D.y .9-. �. y�V4 .G rVi C N ~VG'q 6G. O V W Y � C V V O b 'S•i a` L V { L n N q A V C G +^ V � 4:. Fe � N ^ C 9 `"' �...`.m. NY Z� �~ a N ac b. o2.��lf V O `N .� axi u.�.•n— °v +'�b mLn �vi'Q OU .+i °c µ`ms.. <E{ip a a Nv w 1IQ r�+N tai s RM �u ' V 86L O o .Fy S� CaO, c G all 1 s� � ti Gc t vw.oa v1 O. q 11p1 l Lt e``.+ ". Su`e� o+v.= '•i G .�•c p>.�LO ��u � GYL t,m�u E� u 0 ° � b �^ u 5 2 y t• > y o t� .+ � i w � M V N tJ 2 .. >J,O�n 9i q Ci Mu °9y �� / L.�.y1.G. yCaL,Y Li v02 °O G^ O.O, feI yy Op n A O �6y + 'oaLO,nx GYM id O tiM L r { S M �w0 N`Nti • ' �. w YY° Y °I L i y _ w Y.'T n V C N L` 9 V C w T YYi D ii �n .iyp Yal VY N6p9V S.C..NL yp CSf C O C C�CN LV IOO a a°+WS RVY b LL�2 Vp•�.O NxCOqu1 lK `� L wL/ i L N � ^^ 4> Y�L Yi Ytln 11 pb.w .�.�. C a�704�aGi bcgbO Y O1 G' L N n V' N m y ^> V Ol V O Y n L C V q. l 9 C b. °° Q ✓ N C� y w yF �°. ^O .-. x„��V Yu Dqt• qw d� CSCC V9 .�ug'.`� -.0 `°h yN �+ti•y6 V�t gGQa 9] < Y t `y1 4z 1� w N O.V. Vat'•!. V N 9 C t C y � V i ^. b 9 y V 0 R r. 4 C G A aG. p 0 p � °~ °� 5• b6� °1.0 G ^a w.0 Cep 01'O° � � yi P� O W.O•�G, VY �^� V t•npq'O \.NO �w �+�C OY� 4UV •,,. °y N °u Ta � ^i G NO. Kw °G ° r.NCV K.-p °yiVp a� k Oc -27 o :2 7 be Ly 32 "!2 s z iv — rvbrn p 2 2t zx 7 tm R., -91 G 7i :5 1; Iz ai Al -27 o 031 141 ;1 Q-a-va nit Nne tf ru :2 7 be 32 "!2 s z rvbrn p 2 zx 031 141 ;1 Q-a-va nit Nne tf ru �qa d � a[ E .c Taw• 4 q F , • . L 'q d ' y i'^ 4d..c 'W •d U. LL.� pi�ei �y'•4y L , °� crAFd ^ S _p C L �•' E d 4 ay y i� G J cC 3 ^ V L O.Sy arM Y u d Ell C'Yd 9NLY. LCnN .� A� t) d x b U q q�. � d •. b o o GqmL Vpd dqN�^ bbd 3 ♦ V Q 8.9 �ns.L cTd q CCj NE�YM a N^ � Lb ._• Uv d F•uWLd. eyW 4 L. r y..+ q V,O N 1 s M� na o L Y4 HL � ; °y CO N�rti O nY mead+ 4 gIN.c.°. ° L aL^ N q o yc�w q aq a akqE d > H�L .^'a N 6GU iLU.ln6 Fnq �qa P^ •qt Lit v a F , • . L 'q d � ^ C �_ � G pi�ei �y'•4y L , °� crAFd ^ S _p C cy S a d bl.�N a"Cb�T arM Y u d Ell �L y�vE qm Vpd dqN�^ Haas u np 3 g Q ♦ V Q 8.9 �ns.L cTd o a N^ � Lb E Uv d F•uWLd. y.0 U i s l C G'.i C.A1�N N•� L al C r q4.p w q V,O N 1 s M� na o L i ^oa cv ns g Q ♦ V . r w C q c "••. A C bgad � gtiy O �� of UQ M� na o L Y4 M� 4', � 4 Y�� h O i•� � 4 O y� 0 L aL^ N C �. a q akqE E c,ia o LbGC ° Lv. Y na Dy E.� -C C�u .041..s� .1L WLL �M c mb ~i 1. N.c 'T^uL� o7 a �LCS tL •'� OY� � �l UbyT . L4 d 4d N n N1 Y6C ... C. .VI L nqY N np bnQ y ^....v �. • do o u a. as a > atu TL a YNb.. NSA G'�a C— Ib.�•• 4 �lC� q O �' ate'^ Z ^ �L NN23 >1Z.V.Y �' TL' cOu o Zf.. £'� b C 4 M '� M L -� �' • WET LaQ a u.`�''� ;5 El 0-11 O �l C Z .}1 U d °n 0 - a lu w 'ep ADO. -9.E E1 NE b.�p >b T d rlpJ epf ✓ L pd.V ✓� y � rn A� � q b .n TN Y= CW • � CGa o ^ •^d OID L ` N e N V tII tb., e 6 � map c E ti v ^ � put L✓ p+L OE L..«p. Ny CC _'F•. `E cfS p✓j b �y t O = ECei .eR YEV px` EYE Y G O ^EE A' N >d ' Y A ^o A A p d� Zc- E e'•" C 2 '° C W g b y^T y• N"'• Ofa La n� E� W� d .p du n N d E 9 O •� 4 A {J Y u r Y .A �".� R� u.'v ��� c�o ^9 =y u ,•. Lq ^� L •^-cE rTc ^ wN_ +u-.B� t oqa^ �a ^aE �o u °bud 6O• O m ^2^Jb V W. Gfp. w Y.'p Q+�i d +YM E u W Nl M O hI' C 6L ap 4 •• • 91 1 2 W j µ ' I 4 w ^ ^ ~^ 9� C u q 9 a✓ y � rn A� •'" �� A p 4 a � b0 p'O y d Y V Y ^ A P � � p N6 p A y•.. ed <4 NrnN6 '�u C Lp •� Y O pet 9y E. �. �� q� T`pq d� V G ✓. y.:N ap' 9p N ^^ v. ,v v✓ ma. ..o L.� pw 9 p fr'•� C e 9 p to EQ,L E u n C` T A Qr M. q e,>a e• — a µ ' 'O r. ..f P y 9 O } '." C E _ S 9 V 9. U U Y Y A G ^ y p ar I� J M •O N� q N • W N 9 W Y V � 6 {•LJ `Je 6 2 <✓ 60 d 6JTU L n !-O q i N A d' a N. � • w c 0 x° L 3 AR ^ G ! O u W . E �d o c O C � •- in a w c u° uv L V ^ W r L o Y Si V 6 ° c u a S=.. L Vp1 g LO O 1 V� c a ° L4O c u « oN '= E aMtj r V YI a ' Ic +Q t i d� � �°+a•d� e e S p n mw.0 rl6 qQ 4 4, Qi UNp y u N i .ti ya .° %- ° ° '° E V S• C ° C C � M V �' 2 »d y ° y dE C lit- ECE d d » •• is . » w +v ,� w �dL u « n v iA ^V y is y'p9Y apa E E S Cl ,n ' c' n —a c. o noo , cq «cp m cu v°L'c+ ° I. A^ L CL �� y C • qqv L.•. NY «_ w � ^ .�« dO,C S S N o ^u V O CiY>1 }�� yu°i2« .0 'Q na � uy O•� i i •�. u �O .».. aYOYa �''a sia v »uv o 2 1 M. D O N a Y.G y` i 6i S5COd d NE. O OTC Ci y FL & 0 6 y 1 Y A-., E E pp L V L n> y O ad N ^ w dY 6d N t q O ^ 9 i Y W A« d q�f O •-. �.pd 0, E L pw � d Y�E T T lO.l L L. 9 C a ^ T b L y C �m� aY.r d d C uT grad .pc •�•.. W C Vd0 G « Tom. «N � .p N 6W Sr. 46MJ°• NVas+asi NO 64w 6V1.� W�.�L 4V 24 V�J ! U°. c 0 x° L 3 AR ^ G ! O u W . E �d o c O C � •- in a w c u° uv L V ^ W r L o Y Si V 6 ° c u a S=.. L Vp1 g LO O 1 V� c a ° L4O c u « oN '= E aMtj r V YI a ' Ic +Q t i d� � �°+a•d� e e rl6 qQ 4 4 Q Qi UNp y y°, C 9 9 y ya .° %- ° ° d C ^ Q > C ° C C NC. y� M M V V e61 2 2 E ^ � .• E 'Y Y ECE d S q V V 4 0 Om w +v ,� w iA ^V y y'p9Y apa E E S ^ G ! O u W . E �d o c O C � •- in a w c u° uv L V ^ W r L o Y Si V 6 ° c u a S=.. L Vp1 g LO O 1 V� c a ° L4O c u « oN '= E aMtj r V YI a ' Ic +Q t « t N^ V Y L d an o N O e . V e LL ay rL T �a 'V fJ � N v l T ~ V L.dC ET O.v w �, L ov L Tu Y `V od. « _ °.. Lua r O t„1 d d Y oL � You � V .^ 6 q. � d•� G DI Lod � COl Md d DC GU Rj� d6.e Gd 6L w V � w uY uur' a\y 'p^\° aradFl •w- u ad.«- \`o T(1 N L9 yW } 7 « TM 4 os of r r A '. s b '. ' < u� <.'��� LG� YT nY aR r°n A q i d ^L E "i �d Ul= = C GNP }A ^ y^ >CA CO at Y` 4cd 61C°Ja r Iz P' « t N^ V Y L d an o N O e . V e LL ay rL T �a 'V fJ � N v l T ~ V L.dC ET O.v w �, L ov L Tu Y `V od. « _ °.. Lua x d u° u n oL ° � V .^ 6 q. � d•� G DI d ✓ c" w V « t N^ V Y L O y LO W N� N O e . V e LL ay rL T �a 'V fJ � v l T ~ V L.dC ET O.v w �, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 14, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and :+embers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSML•NT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13057 - THE WILLIAM LYON CGMPANY - residential tract su s Yv lon o 2276.97 acres wi in the Victoria Planned Community (Low- Medium Residential ", 4 -8 dwelling ;units per acre) into 147 lots ldCated at the southeast corner of Highland Avenue and the Deer Creek Channel - APH,• 202 c.11 -13, 38. I. BACKGROUND: Gt, March 27, 1985, the Planring:,Commission appeoved e rea evelopment Plan for the Victoria Groves Village. This Area Plan establishes the future land use patterns and circulation system for the Groves Village. On November 13, 1985, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract 133022. This map subdivides the Victoria „roves into'275 individual single- family parcels currently under - development, with the remaining areas being subdivided into larger parcels for future subdivision per the Victoria Groves Area Development Plan (see Exhioit "C "). Tentative Tract 13057 W00 d subdivide Lot 280 of Tentative Tract 1302' into 147 single family lots. II. PROJECT AND SITE DISCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map and conceptual Trading plan for 147 single family rots. B. Project Density_ 6.F2 lt)ts per acre C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Vacant; Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac). South Vacant; Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) within the Victoria Planned Community (Tentative Tract 13058). East - Vacant; Medium-High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) and Village Commercial Center within the V'ictnria Planned Community (Lot 281 of Tentative 1 ;fact 13022) a,r :a ITEM M /yea PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 14, 1986. TT13057 - The William Lyon Co. Page 2 West - Vatant; G.er Creek Flood Control Channel and Low- Medium Residential (4- 8 'du /ac). ITzitative ;> ' Tract 12952 was just recently approved within this area). D. General Plan Designations; - Praject Site - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac' Medium Residential 0 -14 du /ac). North - Foothill Freeway Corridor; proposed High School site, South - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac); Medium Residential (1 -14 du /ac). East - Meiii,tm Reside'itia1 (4 -14 du /ac); Neighborhood Commebcial. ' West Fiood?�Control; Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). E. Site Character' "'tic' ;:,' The Victoria Groves Village is pre ominan y vacani Tand .did of any significant Land; forms or vegetation, save or a grove of mature Pepper trees. T is grove was to be preserved as the major element of'the Gro es ' Park at the terminus of Victoria 'Park Lane. ko structures or Afth improvments currently exist. This proposed map is the nest northerly phase within the Victoria uroves Village, lying adjacent to Highland Avenue. Within this area, the property slopes to the' .1outhwest at approximately a 5.5% grade. III. ANALYSIS• A,. General :. The ` proposed tract is ronsis•:etrt with the Area ev(3 eiopment Plan for the Victoria Groves village conrgptualiy approved by the Planning Commission (see Exhibit "B ") The designated minimum lot size is 4,000 square feet, wiUi the u✓erage lot size be'ng 4800 square feet. This proposed tract is _planned for subdivision nnly; no unit development is being co „,siuered at this time.' the appli.,aat intends to grade this tract 'to sell "padded lots” I.a "another developer. Per Ordinance requirements, the project developer would be required to reapply for Design Review before building permits ccbuld be issued for unit development. At „the soathern perimeter of the tract is an open space lot to hp d6voloped -as part of the Green Belt Trail system. n PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 14, 1986 TT13057 - The William Lyon Co. Page 3 B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee first reviewed this project at the meeting of March 6, 1986. At that time, the Design Review Committee dU not recommend approval and directed revisions to address specific issues as follows: 1) Eliminate double frontage lots, 2) Eliminate disproportionately dimensioned lots, i.e. lots that are much longer and Wide, 3) Revise street patterns to* (a) Provide a greater �usage of sideron cul-de-sacs, and (b). Viminate offset street crossings by revising intersections to align as close to 90 degrees as possible, 4) Eliminate the dual access points to both Tentative Tracts 13057 and 13058 located approximately 50 feet apart, by providing a single access point into the two tr=ts to pr3vide for a more safe traffic cir..Mation pattern, and 5) Revise the grading scheme to eliminate the massive slope banks along Highland AveriLie (some approaching 95 feet in horizontal dimension) for ease of maintenance and to provide more useable yard space. The William Lyon Conpany has sinced revised the map to address the stated Concerns of Ue Design Review Committee. The.revised map was then subsequently subm'tted for, the re-review and approval of the Coi;�ittee. Tho Committee found the revised map to have addressed aM--5-31r areas of concern anir rec 3roval of the reFsed subdivision mag and conceptu n. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed tne proj-eff-ain-d-&e-teirmined that, with the recomended Conditions of Approval, the project is coiiais�pnt with all applicable Standards and Ordinances. The Er'gineering Di'vislon aad similar concerns of the Design RvAew Ccm.ittee that the origipa--design showed access points for Tracts 1305iand 1Z858 too close togtther. The revised map showing a single ac�ess point for the two tenti)tive tracts has eliminated this concern. PLANNING COWISS103 STAFF REPORT May 14, 1986 TT13057 - The William Lyon Co. Page 4 F D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study Xmas been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. A copy of Part II or the Environmental Checklist is attached For your review and consider^tion. I E. Underprounding of Utilities: No overhead utilities exist Tr`onti ngInz s pro; ec , nowever, 12 KV electrical and q telecommunication lines, do exist on the opposing side of Highland Avenue' It is recommended that the applicant be vequirad to pay an in -Y eu fee equivalent to 1/2 of the established costs of undergoundirg the street frontage. IV. FATS FOR'FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the 'Victoria Planned o— and yl�and the General Plan. The project will not be dtrimental o adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Community, the Development Code and City Standards. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a p, c hearing in a a�iTy— Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent ;--11 property owners within 300 feet of the project - site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: % Staff recommends that the Pli_Ining Commission approve this project through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully su itted T` Brad Buller City Planner BB:BC:das Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Area Development Plan Exhibit "Cu - Tentative 'Tract 13022 ' Exhibit "D" - Tentative Tract. Map /Grading Plan Initial Study, Part II Resolution of Approval with Conditions M I L73 S-CUCNIM 3141 7 S3XV1 3141 . Vi I 3 is wgit .t j, g 5 N cl) Mu M n Lxu od z LU f"Z R ir of UFA" 2 x 0 z V) 0 :5 - uj m M m to m M 2 > mum LUI x 0 uxi M In m LU ti CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN-ION ,,. 'TEN'- , �Gr 'I PLANNhNG DIVISIaN TITLE: .0c.41" E.XlilBIT- SCALE- ---------- TENTATIVE TRACT r- D NO. 13057 TENTATM@ TRACT Ciry OF RANCHO CUCAWONOA SE�q MUMMY 801)` P01&7M .ONE DEl:EMBER 10. 1985 SITE UTILIZATION MAP VICTORIA GROVrti THE WILLIAM LYON �' S �Sr^ANY INC. "�"� . tR��p esn�noauns<nsrvvaoacx�oas.vi a�.sir�s .� rnr c ,Y Or ", PLANNM DrvISION € AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN VICTORIA GROVES Rancho Cucatonga, 0a. - - wv,u®sae _ _ _ waaue '--•� - -- = - - C LYON�:ORSEta43[2yi`1NGClr , -� .ZT ultN DOr/ _mot _ • 1 ' LAND USE LEGEND AND = '�t twaac mrsf.pat mar UNIT TABU on ,• •= a''• Fir- 1 PHASE { LMrrr.m / Ct:,\ • `•s+ t G T.r". L t..�. uOtYniCl von �_l ? _�' 2\ •t IVY 4a WAC \ i • :i •+ Jam' =t C 1 1 -A �w•aow� a�oDai'I tix OLD 1! I( D tOw+E�IL OFlQt1l tTS]Lo - •_! -1 { ..l •6' \•Ll t', ,1 .y' MH t-�f tca- 1ma,trwty aaro T to 10 aon y J .. �'\ tt • ro0���'\ - w`'nu►"°I °°°n ti { }_..r. i-1 .mnooeitt axo.e.6 !%t a ' .. r t.. y.. ~ -•� _ � �.ii. _ M u -t.auw ntaan r "N - A PHASE 11 .�....�.. raoWle ' /f�'j . r _ ' •tom- :" . f ERt j tz t 3°''' 1 z •, J �' .` �? \.. yyrMl 110 a'....wrE " /� ; 77.E — �. `' L �, •. ,1 � ^ Y �� i •. lwOP09EO ShCa IR[ I1MO08m IIJ![Yf[ .�� ./ �� � �•� ,\ wm ' . ssr K.t r i t { ass 1t _'. a- = Y +`,`�•y •. t •+. .,,ai i \ y et l x 1 i �: '�''= 6 / a,.�{ r ? '��_t_F���r �� v4p� � `:=•c .''arm` • \- . _LMS =w 'r a : 1 / (., e ]t •�� ,� t om• IIp �( .. Acre t -.., „,�• t�.y �7'. i `... ma, e.4 - �•-- _..�Maoao ,.... -' tJ~a _.may., �,:•. ,:. Yl.t.-. -� CITE' Or G -- IT_" .. AiNC O CUCAIV'()`: �ns 'n f4L t 0 251 Ilk, WE cm Lm J11 On CITY OF- ITE,% 0 RANCHO CUCAN "`'r "'oj TITLE- PLANNING DWSION EXHIBIT- SCALE= lit lit �ns 'n f4L t 0 251 Ilk, WE cm Lm J11 On CITY OF- ITE,% 0 RANCHO CUCAN "`'r "'oj TITLE- PLANNING DWSION EXHIBIT- SCALE= Ell 4\x IN tk In's, S NIV i 41 vk Vt. U, IN --Wv0 it - , t.rz I Ewo, ti 7 5-14-86 P. C. Agenda Packet o Page -5.of 1-09-avu'utsx 100'sr'W v*f�` ,�1ox7 wvl"l.%,Y� ANtldW J t l�WVf' 1 ail 'W7 XTI fSOEt•'ON SOVLU 3AI1V.LN31 X. Fri s ��3j`' I t}t} {;; ':i{ � {If �11f�llfi•ai{i 2 .;t ' rl . 2= Sf •`� if. i 133 �i3� l�l ►�y 1 r 91, 0. r ` j,o FvL ,, .s o.av`e . • .o►s a�rcuue tt w yap I 5 _ /'r. `� \y ��.� -- e�a�(•ag. a it �! } x �• �.: . � E 2 i Out a � � s CIZY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL. CHECKLIST DATE: j' A gjJ L°I ip APPLICAST: �u4.Ld FILING DATE: LOG NUMBER: � _-=T- PROJECT: °ROJECT LOCATION:- y-a�•� +# - �V� ���Srz�,iRaGCJHftS1i I- E11VIRd1':1ENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on sheets). attached YES M.AYF.E NO �. Soils and1Geologg• Will the proposal have s19-- ficaat results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions,_ displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c. .Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification Of any unique geologic or physical features? e• Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people at property to geologic hazards such _ as earthquakes, landslides, mud - slides, ground failure, or'similar hazards? h• An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? 2. Hydrolo Will the m. proposal have significant a`, results in; , Page YES a +,Y3'c "'D a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, cr ephem: -ral stream channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the :ate and amount of s runoff? urface water C. Alterations to the course ar flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount oj. surface water in anv body of water? Discharge e. into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? _ g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct^ additions or with- drawals, or through .riterference with aquifer? an Quality? Quantity! h. The reduction in tie amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? I- Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air _ Q uaiitX- Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobsle or incirect sources? Stationary sources. ? X- b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attaintnt of applicable air quality standards? YY C. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. in: Will the proposal have significant results ' a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Reducticn of the numbmrs of any unique, rare or endangered species of I plants? ?ae 3 No c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant results in: a. Change to the characteristics of species, > including diversity, distributiva, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? -_ " d. Deterioration or removal of t• exis,xng risk or ail:. =.._a habitat? — 7 5, Povulation. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human populaticu of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have k significant results in: a. Cl -ange in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? . b. Will project costs be equitably distributed' among project beneficiaries, i.e., beers, ff tax payers or project users? Ci i 7. Land Use and Plannine Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area: -- b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of ' existing consumptive or non- consumptive recrea4lonal opportunities? gn -�y ''_e » 1 YES \L yBr No 8. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant -results ins a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? C. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- ti.on systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? y f. Alterations to or effects on present and �`- potential water- borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have Sig- ifi.cant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. Health. Safety, and Nuisance ;actors.' Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances In the event of an accident? a d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors? h. An Increase in light or glares Page 5 YES uzl'3= No 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or View? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? e c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal h'aWe a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b. Na:, ,l or packaged gas? c, Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? u T h. Fire protection? I. Police protection? J. Schools? -- k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? _ m. Other governmental services. r 13. Enerev and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results :. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? a' b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? C An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? 7 d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non- renewable forms of energy, trhen feasible renewable sources of energy ar, available? 'age fi YES `LaY3E NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. Mandatory Fiadi_ o£ SificancA, a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality, of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate f important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). C. Does thf. project have impacts which are individually limited, buL cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively conside-.able means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ZT. DISCUSSION nr ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUITION ( the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitig tionemeasures)to TH1s K, ��`�l�e•�-t L.�4-� b, 1�„�,�„��CrSTS �1� r'IIitG [►q.1 M sr��� � v ?.,VtaW Fuu" � LarR$p ►s�►�v�r�a,�- o dtr-t► TNT. SIR �Ps►� �N Gan ► c. -j`io,._i t-1� -t�i�. �5�,- �aga�, '�a.ae -�� ��ec- +utJt-� Patz. 7" III. DETERMI`iATIO`7 On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find, the proposed project COLLD'NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a N'ZGATTVE DECLARATION will be prepared. '�� I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect a this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheRt have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project :LAY have a significant effect on the envirnment, and azi MIRON.`IENT I11PACT REPORT is required Date g iI9. i l�.ir C£C2 itle 1, , RESOLUTION NO. t A RESOLUTTC`! OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ` RANCHO CUCAMON'GA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING R, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13057 WHERE`S, Tentative Tract Map No. 13057 hereinafter "Map" submitted by :ihe William Lyon Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 22.55 acres within the Victoria Planned ( Community .(Low - Medium Residential, 4 -8 dwelling units per acre;,, located at the southeast corner of Highland Avenue and the Deer Creek. Channel (APN: 202- 211-13, 38) into 147 lot,;, regularly came b:a ore the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on May 14, 1986; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended,_approval of the Map subject to all condi1 ons set forth in the Enginee:rfig and Planning Division's �`. reports; and W'[REAS, the Planning Comission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidefi" presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ® Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Plarnin, Commission makes the following findings in regard to e- a we Tract No. 133057 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Pian, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acq fired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed suodivision. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION May 14, 1986 TT 13057 - The William Lysn Co. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 13057, a copy of which is attached ereF to, is hereby approved subject to all of the followin3 conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division 1. Prior to recordation of Tract 13057, all conditions of approval applicable to and imposed upon Tentative Tract 13022 shall be complied with, including, but nok, limited to, the completion of off -site improvements and greenbelt trail areas. 2. Prior to recordation of Tract 13057, the final map for Tract 13022 shall be recorded. 3. The greenbelt trail area located along the southerly boundary shall be indicated on the final map as Lots A and 8 of Tract 13057, 4. This mar) is being approved as a Tract Subdivision only. Any future proprsals for the eve opmen o five or more residential units shall require Design Review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits for any units. 5. Concurrent with any application for Design Review, . the applicant shall also submit an acoustical study detailing what mitigaton measures, if any, are requireo, to achieve noise levels, both exterior and interior, consistent with City Standards for lots abutting Highland Avenue. 6. Landscape treatments at the end of side -on c'ul -de -sacs, shall be designed to provide an open view into th• interior of the cul -de -sac. Design . treatment shall include the use of decorative wrought iron fencing and sidewalk connections from the sidewalk to the perimeter street. 7. A six foot high masonry wall shall be provided along Highland Avenue consistent with the approved wall design for Highland Avenue. This wall shall be staggered and offset to increase visual interest and shall be setback a minimtmr 6 -foot distance behind the Highland Avenue right -of -way beyond the Cal Trans limits of Jurisdiction to ensure adequate wi�i a wi nnrow s %1 a oef p�rtting can seten wehcire designated design standards of the Victoria Planned (Y) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION May 14, 1966 7,13057 - The William Lyon Co. Pa; 'e 3 Community. Landscape maintenance easements will be required where tiie perimeter wall encroaches onto. private lots and are to be dedicated on the Final Map. Final. platting of all wails and locations of all landscape easements are to be determined prior to recordation of the Final Map. 8. Five -foot high decorative fences will be required .long street side lot lines for all lots that either side -on or rear -on to Victoria Groves Loop Road. In rear -on conditions wails will be of masonry block construction. In situations where street grade is below pad grade resulting in a sloped parkway, fence Lines are to be coincident with the top of slope. Landscape maintenance easements will be required where fences enrxoach onto private lots and are to be dedicated or, the Final Map. Final'1,platting of all fences and locations of all easements are to be determined prior to recordation of the Final Map. 9. Any retaining walls used, other than those at the tract perimeter adjacent to the Geer Creek, tannel, are to be a maximum of 4` high. A six toot high !!i masonry screen wall shall be provided along the ® westerly tract perimeter adjacent to the Deer Creek Channel. 10. All retaining walls visible to the general public, i.e. on the streetside of corner side yards and within: the front yard, are to be constructed of a decorative material to the satisfaction of the City P1 annQw 11. All back of lot grade differentials are to be no greater than 12`. Engineering Division 1. Victoria Groves Loop Road,.shall be constructed full width to Highland Avenue with the first phase of development. Sidewalks and parkway landscaping may be deferred until adjacent pLrcels are developed. 2. The entire width of Victoria Park Lane shall be constructed from the Loop Road to Milliken Avenue with the first phase of development. I �� a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION May 14 1986 TT 13057 - The William Lyon Co. Page 4 3. Milliken Avenue shalt be constructed as follows with the first phase of dt-VvI opment A. Portion from Victoria Park Lane to Southern Pacific Railroad: (1) Full improvements for west roadbed, (2) Full m -d1an with only one opening at the Loop Roid, and (3) A minimum 18' wide pavement for the east roadbed. B. Portion from Southern Pacific Railroad to Base Line Road: (1) Full median, (2) A minimum 18' wide pavement on both sides _ of the median, is (3) Drainage control devicus such as paved ditches, AC berms or curbs shall be installed as approved by the City Engineer. C. Railroad Crossing: (1) Construct full improvements for both roadbeds including medians (except for parkway silewalks and landscaping) for at least 200' on both sides of the railroad. (2) The developer shall coordinate with the City to have the railroad crossing signal and arms installed prior to occupancy to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. D. The cost of the permanent improvements in excess of the standard one half street improvements adjacent to the tract boundary shall be subject to reimbursement from the City for the adjacent property owners upon development of their property. 4. Storm drain easements as required for cross lot drainage shall be dedicated on the final map. Tx. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Mdy 14, 1986 TT 13057 - The Witliam Lyon Co. Paga 5 5. The storm drain master plan for the area shall be completed and approved prior to recordation of the Final Map. 6. Construct sufficient storm drain facilities to serve G each phase of development as required by the City Engineer, The facilities shall be designed to contain Q100 within the street or easement right -of -way. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OPAJAY, 1986.. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis E. Suat, chairman ATTEST: F Brad Buller, Depury secretary I, Brad e..11er, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commissionof the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the faregoitig Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS, r — D13 (tea o O s � a V _ « w e V i A A m m `o d — u _ o c a a V V MJ O 3 y L y O J A. A ] U E _ 9 aa; cM' q 1• Aq �G.nE u q.L € Ny a N 09 Y Mme' ° Y ° 3� ° e tUO q ° t ya CV OyU S u V Gyr.6L Y as C 2 1. y v9. •y tC�A OI E .1 u S SW LO ACM ^6 Q A dp and Mw iV. `oy < V u_ 'N U �' E C V cv 'cam a� aC d dro Yv u'C^ .V S^ N c V« 9aL °U Y� .^+ 9 O C Sao >~E •1. ...z�^ ° �'? ° x L= 8'--. t.°. aoouq o.Oau SdML dpY O u•.i Y` ^n 9. 6u ti. E 5 ar Y CON CCy..9G4. L Vim,. yat yeC ° %.Cr ^6 �C•yd^ NGi `Ty YyN q ^�M U� N,q^ 9 L'°9 NyN 166.08= iM �� N`O SaaC E« =,43Cdp •tee a u �Q'Q,� M° w c wNC no°...0 4° p 4o c LC O�.UNDO3 LqS� ° H D.OwyM Y Qu..NYM 3 °+T 9 CY.6 <Gg10 r.°C° O O.L RV n; �T (tea o O s � a V _ « w e V i A A m m `o d — u _ o c a a V V MJ O 3 y L y O J A. A ] U E _ 9 w WI �9-1 aa; cM' q 1• Aq �G.nE u �t+o cnL CwN qt o. > °° °u «- v -Xt.- L S Y yG.N XN _ T OCI.` + V q O" OY.z 6 Yr v qau., o nu u S SW LO ACM ^6 ' NC L°ry r°iY UV Y�V caMr O�J Na EO'V� l� yj w WI �9-1 ic i q �utc b y C 6�. E d 4 u • E �¢a Tabu E y G bar _ A olYyJ C E yd 55 .. i o. j N °gym ACU^ :.YNo LE °„ :a... � O � o ° EE G O y E .a.NMN LAN C r C.• a • r= awTULOO Ai HgvY°.LuC = Cn� c �`�. ' L OAU.i O q 2 °n ^ Gd LCw ty ° G y'6L' °N t/L q.E avOi N CEOY C p L d C 4 � � `. b �.'O` A+N• y w. ` 1i'tL EE�. ,^^ L �� -. :.1 Ql eGUI° ` ° OlSil ap+L _ °d t.6tud v H w�G OAT dd `•^ u.gd4�.M pbq TIC r ���.- .am �qo4 E 4 •r] o �uY ° ^bb L ci 2 °2 Y w CL LL x.o OT ^Lx0 V_ IV„A V y> y O t -;.5 % O..O W°•- =.aY L Gx pN NAC T. n 2 1• =N rn ° TEE N.voa�v O O ^a. y y� o om payL D• C A 2 C �O YyQ4.. ^� T� � c.. '• d Q� 014. d C d AC '•pTLM \•F' GyN Y i i° C.Ta•.tT �•� • '_ q`C Y °9M C �� E L O Y �'°� = A E° ANq Na•.�.v� S.nN ^°1E = �Q dil °do N a. d r GagE ^u 2 °0• `o d d° 9C� °a °� _ Ad 4E-n6 C N Y ar N •a. 33NdV w -W Nd.°+�q O Wr^3C ° y�^/ -.- .N. 6 iAMA N6 p f ti S.Y� U ic i q as b O L 7 3TC j N °gym ACU^ :.YNo LE °„ :a... V C L n —xzair }1 O � o ° EE y u N` uLi y c Y. V.`.•A wN .a.NMN LAN iAE 4.:N �� a • r= awTULOO Ai HgvY°.LuC ��o2r N q� °ci, ° =S•^V t/L CEOY C p A� ^E ° v1Y y q�AY°�.0 w` °N N 'Y.^�a N A �� .OIL= 3 N9 L, U i• �� �^ c r � EE Nd4,•C,", 1! >Ny.0 d NI L:j'� V�iY� O.i N^ qW2 LL x.o OT ^Lx0 V_ IV„A V y> y O t -;.5 % O..O W°•- =.aY L WWa C n T. n 2 1• =N rn c a b6 O Ca O L q .=.0 °un.�O T -° p° °Eq°pu N .p Ao A .E qU.V y C o w�; EV X 72 GyN C �� E L O Y �'°� = A =_ �O O E y 0 Ly N• _. V t Y C W° � Y d N V Y v � r °a °� _ Ad c~u L °s aa-•A eL° — ° y�^/ -.- .N. cu' °c c�,"t'n yopp �O.= S.Y� Olu � C GG V b L 4H6t 5i y 4 H 4 >.O f�NOO E Q�N.p LV{. 9 V19.16Y n.4 ♦^ V AO bL�LO °'U'x >,} nY L Jr96L NY ply V b ° ° v°I V 066.} O i- ol fail izz A V I I a 1. 1 z t o oz At; A 4J 1. S z 3", 24 z t _=� Z:� .5- A A. h a .1 9"— Z Z '- - S=7&-�_' i : 0- z F; :5 5zs A, V S. F- 7" 2 A w I . - lzi -0 a E! X u WE 7i t: 4! w E 0"; .2�;E Z."z -t! -4.,- 1. 2LI. 0= c; 13 3, V. -Z tz a It va Z �i 0 1-- A A lf F.-2 A 1.2 -1 88 A rc .0 ag A- s "- Is C; a A C& Z "Z Eu. Sw z z A, as A, 0 . a- .�z w 0 Z. T.; 1; 6 ZZ t_, U, ..ZE t EA mz m 4. .c I. == = Z . t' I K� C= .0 X E -M- 51 -J4 z. 4J V N •n A Q. WIA = .... n 47 ° E w otu EE S^ �U q o a YC=i d -1.2 -y. N ^Ca G 3d ••U. r'd aY� rd d« ¢E� oC 02 dct CZ uY Olz U E� ^ � C Q w N° t V c sEay L. g E d G r umAq V A N= ^ q C d P 0 V °rsuyu OET.O.J N SOa LOq c ^ar ✓ U -C'� L aas ° U u� I c =u U.drO L L LO m O Y a « = «TL N N NCO ^ 4 a y n^ ^N % u y�ti G ca dn> •- qV A NTnd �4iiiw d -uC� i LSL VIG +N- 1- R 9 _N i0 = .... n 47 ° E w otu EE S^ �U q o a a -y. ^Ca G 3d ••U. r'd aY� G 0V ai r aLi Au «4 U Y 6Q` L J b � C Q w t V c g E d G r umAq C° q+•°j•E �O 24 V °rsuyu OET.O.J N Y .GO auk iu c ^ar WLL C Via. PPu u� I c «°�G V- oAU TEL L Eq v G O Y t-l:W 4. nz O.J Ga{LH L N 6�o•°rp N N 6Ud . ° S N Ao w V tI -�K-1 a ^Ca G 3d ••U. r'd aY� t0 ai r aLi Au «4 U y Cq � C Q w t V c Nvi qe Nd ae : m m.°. >mu °q •'. t^ c O N Y .GO auk iu c ^ar • ro �. u,LO^ C Via. •LO.a` �. �� ecA . > d n a Y .ne L. r w L N z Get Ao s t^ �Nr i E: s. a,•„ A •.-° q 9 _N pq L}• Y av« «N NOS d U E IT v vs OM A V Haas WN L p Y «y F O d A tOy< y Lu `N nAai p NNqE dC Y�y Aa«iFL o~oC> r_a N daE w y ac TV NS° ° ca y u m�'. z.Y .-.p ms C o G 2 Y N t rn SL mn E �• ?� C A} O N Y Y Ub en O ^y a Ny Ta arc^ C 4C > G E dd A A U °O L ^ a ro« v. uq °Q C -i 8 .°. C^ .. cgo y u L nN d CL Lupf °+��- ¢^� pt-Nd U� VI Nom•.- ion' �i °e` 4- rm+C -q+C- 46m . CtVN�- U W1� W¢j hY�y V tI -�K-1 "' � « L � a ro p O cE v N urn a EY tp E E =y ° t a E N uo 6 u� N E : C G q u LnT L 4LL71 '1 =`oc rocca�L _ a 9 T � p a E M e •.Cl)i qi - O a CL = O A O a t C C W~ N r L d N y aq 1 _ roGC 4 > vL v i- n N AYY yOCf S ^9� iaYi N OW. -•- 'O' G C z W J Y N V9 6N "' � « L � a ro p O cE v N urn a EY tp E E =y ° t a E N uo 6 u� N E : C G q u LnT L 4LL71 '1 N y aq 4: Y _ roGC 4 N AYY yOCf S ^9� C �C U t pq NaNU Aq 'O' °+E• Y ro CP aY 1- E'C^ uE Yu u'. T� Y bL 6 N O o V pIi Y N ro y Y W O C •O� AY f.: pn Yu • N.^ pp YN rz ... c a. A. al L N c T Op !'LB 6° 9N L OY pp u� n` °O Fa 2 w IL•N VON�T Y iYN9 WYU L 'L •^ �6 i,i�6E !� <O O 6 C1Y Y 1�0 y �AN, u .�. cz� 4� � a "' � « L � a ro p O cE v N urn a EY tp E E =y ° t a E N uo 6 u� N E : C G q u LnT L 4LL71 '1 W. 41 U G1 •n c Q. v v pu « LW k y r N Lt v a e Y dL +: w:+o.c .°coa 000 a� �o a caa a.c u ,C �° L a U 0• 9 u O' � O G O T lr N N C L iq' o y9 2 v ^ V a a Ht Y2 ^t L ° o d O A .NF+L v Ed �y LL°.r Y d ^a �c qc ~ E d aN y p o 7j .p Y v Y 'Oao oa C w+ .V d• 6y cN N� Cpdj q 2 L r T L O O dr T E A r d p N S L qY a a.E.NgU N 9 a t d N�_ -. O 4T w a°a u r L -Ga°i OU LddCY G pd °pq ccq qr CW q q� L¢. O�sq Nu d9 C w Nb r7 O � �i� �M d� AO O r CLI LSLp1w r ^y 0 a. Y i i C cU�tLL G V L � r 6.l L p C T u �� q d „Lt W L ,,, u ° v_•- a >, �Cy d Ema _`.wn cd CEd �' L p - CY. p iry L Gj,!!�. N. ^ _ �4aN� o Op Lu nu,u^L �^ q �.� Na urp.°+o N ^ 62aw �L. C,� 68M1°+ hO�� Y VrIC O qU LY�.r W EN 6V + y ��W �~ w SN RE W`u.L LtI Z6 L10. i 2 Q p ! Y°. 14 �y b v v pu « LW k y r N Lt v a e Y dL +: a : 6 qp L 6 X wr IL C00 ^9an CZ � O G Nd C L iq' y9 2 v ^ V a a Ht Y2 ^t L ° o d p E B. .NF+L v Ed �y LL°.r Y d ^a �c qc ~ E d aN y p o _ 'Oao oa C w+ de qu cN dA 6vL Way ° Vqq NO: K'L r ' U� N C S 0 zc °ER i k K ti W X ! O C: N J .a a °a N 3 ui 4 a aW a°a u 2 N fY1''� -Ol E a n G wp. d m J T 6 r 9 U C f N= O 09 q V L 0 v = � r. Ldd E ^ t 4 O L L L � 6h0 L � O � 6 C o d Y u Wzv o Lyq r � Cd a y q d a O L9p `o o s °jp w u ar L o c N q p, d u .°pO � ae 1 i °wE 2 W q C L L 6 ar r d o s i 'O �= as d � M 6 d ^ �a d�u °a u � L u N L a � i u �+ d L O u o v L +y r o 'n 2 LL uo2 Yo W V L Or u•~ L d 6v O 1 i I 12 0 « M r o c i o o O c r 0 d a a L N L - v. q E E a O O � uy� Y •N q0L NL N C a. ypApN ^� }i U 0.9 V. y i •� o.. i G. w N VW N Y Q C E 3 N C L .fir L L� O.i anV V° d. wi. c •- ea c C N •O = E N U L C aau �a to y•L- `.�. ofn �. q .' �° � B. ..N q a° ci ¢ r M. - a>.a E U W Z N � i^ t d y. t L.o N •O y L N ..., d �^ q aT c �O w q O^ O HFM C p 0 0 46N. t' g L� J2� Of u 9 Y dr- N V J D %aq� di u S ^. F.M Y Cxa 6•r t�G :d 4n rr o a °wE 2 W q C L L 6 ar r d o s i 'O �= as d � M 6 d ^ �a d�u °a u � L u N L a � i u �+ d L O u o v L +y r o 'n 2 LL uo2 Yo W V L Or u•~ L d 6v O 1 i I 12 0 « M r o c i o o O c r 0 O O � uy� qN •N q0L NL � M � O Zy^ p��r2 C a. ypApN ^� • CO q y 4 VW N Y Q C E 3 N C L Vw y Y qG L� O.i anV V° ..N q a° ci u r qu a q U W G t 6° O O, aQ Zay q aT c �O w q O^ O HFM C p 0 0 46N. te a° KN L� J2� Of u 9 Y dr- N V J D %aq� di u S ^. F.M Y rn -3D °wE 2 W q C L L 6 ar r d o s i 'O �= as d � M 6 d ^ �a d�u °a u � L u N L a � i u �+ d L O u o v L +y r o 'n 2 LL uo2 Yo W V L Or u•~ L d 6v O 1 i I 12 0 IE i Ir `I L t. vc nruvt,n•✓ vu�.rurtvlvvn C.;CAAro%, STAFF REPORT �0 �q 0 U> DATE: May 14, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13058 THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A residential trac su iv san o acres wi in a Victoria Planned Community (Medium Residential 4 -14 du /ac) into 201 lots, located on the west side: of Victoria Groves Loop Road, south of Highland Avenue - APN: 202- 211 -13, . 38. I. BACKGROUND: On March 27, 1985, the ^fanning Commission approved e Area D evelopme t Plan for the Vic -wria ,,Groves Village. This Area Plan establishes the future land use patterns and circulation system for the Groves Village. On November 13, 1985' the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract 13022. This map subdivides the Victoria Grol,,ees into 275 individual; single- family parcels currently ,e;der development, and the remaining areas being subdivided into larger parcels for future subdivision per the Victoria Groves Area Development Plan. Tentative Tract 13058 subdivides Lot 279 of Tentative Tract 13022 into 201 single family lots., II. PROJECT AND SIZE DESCRIPTION: A.' Action Requested:, Approval of subdivision and conceptual grading for 201 single- family lots,. B. Project Density: 7.05 dwelling units per acre C. Surrounding Land Use and 'Aning: North - Vacant, Low- McQium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) within the Victoria Planned Community (Tentative Tract 1'x057) South - Vacant; school /park site, and Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) (Tentative Tract 13059) both within the Victoria Planned Community (Tentative Tract 13059) East - Vacant; Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) (Tentative Tract 13060), and Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) (Lot 281 of Tentative Tract 13022) both within the Victoria Planned Community ITEM N PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 14, 1986 TT 13058 - The William Lyon Co. Page 2 West - Vacant; Deer Creek Flood Control Channel, Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) (Tract 11606), and Low Medium Residential (4 -8 .du /a, ^) (Tentative Tract 12952) D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac); Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) North - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac),•,Medium Residential (4 -14 dulac) South Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) East - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac); Eedium Residential (4 -14 du /ac); proposed elementary school. West - Flood Control; Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac); Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) E. Site Characteristics: The Victoria Groves Village is ;Vre 5- -,-Zan y vacant and void of any significant land forms or vege'setion, save for a grove of mature Pepper trees. This grove was to be preserved as the major element of the Groves Park at the terminus of Victoria Park Lane. No structures or improvements currently exist. Within the area of the proposed subdivision, the property slopes to the southwest at approximately a 2% grade. III. ANALYSIS• t A. General: The primary issue relates to the proposed subdivision ayout as it differs from the approved Area Plana The approved design of the Area Development Plan for this ,proposed tract shows, along its southern perimeter, four cul -de -sac streets f projecting southerly from the Loop Road towards the park site, s with the resulting side -on lot configuration (see " Exhibit "E "). This layout was consistent with the Victoria E design guidelines that is intended to provide 1) maximum public E, access to the greenbelt trail and 2) psychologically make the r greenbelt a part of the neighborhood character. The side -on lot configurations also create "view windows" from the school /park site through the subdivision towards the mountains. The currently proposed subdivision design proposes a series of lots that rear onto the proposed Community Trail. With this configuration there would be no view windows to the mountains and eliminates access to the school /park sites and the greenbelt trail. Rather, the.view from the park /school site w::uld be of a wall /fence along the tract perimeter adjacent to the Community Trail. Staff recommends that the map be revised consistent with the approved Area Development Plan. 11 D iJ F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 14, 1486 TT 13058 - The William Lyon Co. Page 3 e This proposed tract is planned for subdivision only, no unit development is being considered at this time. The applicant intends to grade this tract and construct streets to sell II "padded lots" to another developer. Per Ordinance f requirements, the project developer would be required to reapply for Design Review before building permits could be x issued for unit development. The tentative map incorrectly identifies the greWbelt trail to the south as Lot E of Tract 13022, which ',should be indicated as Lot B of Tract 13058. Also, the map - incorrectly identifies the northerly greenbelt trait as Lots F and G of Tract 13022, which should be labeled as lao)s A and B of Tract 13057. Staff recommends that this tentative map be revised accordingly. E B. Design Review 'Commi +tees The Design Review Committee recommen a ions are as F0, ows: f e 1. Lot dimensions as proposed are satisfactory. For lots with rear yard dimensions Tess than 30 feet, these narrowed dimensions are provided as slopes only. Flat, useable yard space does maintain a 30 foot dimension. 2. Design of the subdivision should conform to the approved Area Development Plan making use of side -on cul -dg -sacs adjacent to and providing access "', .de Community Tvail shown along southern perimeter of the tract. i 3. The trail and park /school site interface should i be at different grade elevations, with the trail at the same general elevation as the adjacent home sites and a slope bank down to the park /school site. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project and determic-& :rat, with the recommended Conditisha of Approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the apps can Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. A copy of Part II of the Environmental Checklist is attached for your review and consideration. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 14, 1986 TT 13058 - The William Lyon Co. Page 4 IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project must be deemed consistent with e Victorla Planned Community and the General Plan, and not detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, must be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Community,: the Development Code, and City Standards. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Re ort newspaper, the •property posted, and notices were sent a a property owners within _B00' of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission direct the applicant to revi;'e the subdivision layout along the south tier of lots to be consistent with the approved Area Dev6&Votent Plan and to identify the greenbelts properly as stated herein. Respectfully submitted, i- Brad Buller City Planner BB :BC:das Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Area Development Plan Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract 13022 Exhibit "D" - Tentative Tract Map /Grading Plan Exli.W t "E" - Comparison Site Plan Initial Study, Part II IE lu 11 A a iMCtlGNIM jNj ��� 53MV1 3N1 Y + Em Ut MS�I I 8 LL mmmm LU X X X wwww .. ■ a R "lisR 0U cow' Z �cc w w ch �q® Zi x � I LU ® M iD M M = =55 mz N w W W W B2 '� f � Lui fE > F=. i CITY Or. ITEM. _.., 0 RANCHO Cj:CA`IO\GA TITLE PLANNING DIV LSIO�N EXHIBIT- SCALE= _ A f TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13058 sENT11W TRACT Y WY OF RANCHO CUCAYONOA ..�.. 806' P8W&-TER ZONE DECEMBER B. 1933 S!r'E UTIUZATION MAP VICTORIA GROVES THE WILLIAM LYON rOMPAW INC. �• IM CI'T'Y OF rrEi�t :- T'f�l5 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DiVLSM F:XHIWi -Atl- SCALE :_ 9 :N• .14 Tr e-% 1., Mi • A I 1 2 1 5 > ILL CITY OF ITEN I: RANCHO CUCANIOA L GA TITLE: P"NWRNG DIVISION EXHIBIT- -:Ctf- SCALE: gin 1xiiii IM41 Tr e-% 1., Mi • A I 1 2 1 5 > ILL CITY OF ITEN I: RANCHO CUCANIOA L GA TITLE: P"NWRNG DIVISION EXHIBIT- -:Ctf- SCALE: r Ask Ire _ Z` C q f. a 1; 1 �S3a•xe�ge Y F; Sg;f�Ileec =pyc'e! 15.1 pp§•: m $qq;i I 61NET f OF 7 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13068 VICTOR► GROVES LYON THE I/JN LY l�Y AW}LLUM nnaz' i:S ���PANY NC. ny{aa�t I�M�RSECONSULTLYCtiRWr aTY T TTFd1Ia - _TT 1��e, + r F'LAMM DIVISION N Etx[Brr: !12. Aa, - -- fit ilk I I � g CITY CF or 130 jm RANcHo cL,(YAicNGA TrIu. :lw�-TNS w-m PLANNM DIVISION EXHiBrrLl- scALE. Em, EM L 1 7771 XL :Y4 X V f enLp_ CITY CF RANCHO CLICAMCNGA TITLE: TVOT4, W P-1 PLANNING DIVEM EXHIBIT: SCALE- In 0 CITY OF RAP:CHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL Sr DY ENVIRONI'MNTAL CHECFL%T DATE: MA.,r APPLICANT: FILI'_;G DATE: rte. li, l` g5 LOG NIMBER:__T"'T" PROJECT:��fei- s�a�'e��iK�e..1 0� Zb 56 6e-a�s ist°fo ?fJ2sa.le,t_s � t�� PROJECT LOCATION: diym�,_ I. ENVIRON^LENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "mayue" answers are required on attached sheets), YES MAYBE NO ! 1 — ! Soils and Geoloev. Will the proposal have signiricant results -in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? s c. .Change in topography or-gruund surface contour intervals? d. roe destruction, cowering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features ". e• Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? -� f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landsldes, mud- slides, ground failure, or- similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and/or use of any mineral resource? . -- 2. Hydroloev. Will the proposal have significant results in: in: results a. Change in the characteristics of species, " including diversity, distribution, or number' of any species of planta? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plan s? x Page i YES w.AYBE a0 a. Changes in ourrents,.or' the course of direction Of flowing streams, AM rivers, or ephemeral stream channels ? = b. Changeg in absorption rates, drainage:,pa. terns, or the irate and amount of surface 'wai er runoff:! c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the 'amount of surface water to any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration y of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? e. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with - drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction In th4 amount of water other - T wise available for Public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? F 3. Aiz — Quality. Wil_ the proposal have significant T results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect ' sources? Stationary sources? --- b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standrrris? C. Alteration of local or regional climatic tit conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant in: results a. Change in the characteristics of species, " including diversity, distribution, or number' of any species of planta? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plan s? x U 11 4 ?aza 3 c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal 'have significa-M results in: a. Change in,the characteristics of species, includin% diversity, distribution,_ or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _ d. Deterioration or r,�noval of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 7-f S. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? r 6. Socio-Fconouic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. ^hange in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or cor=erci.1 diversity, tax rate, and property values ?: b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? yy T 7. Land Use and Plannine Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the prasent or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? ! c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? S ?age 4 YES NO 'J_ Transportation. Will the Proposal have significant in a. Caneration of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects an existing t' ',eets, or demand for new street construction? c. Effects On existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d- Substantial impact upon exiscing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present ,?atterns oi-circula- tion , or movement Of People and/or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water-borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? S. Increases In traffic hazards to =:= -,vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and/or historical resources? ;6L 10. Health, Safety', and Nuisance Factors. Will the Tr_0P-__ have significant results Tn-.. a. Creation of any health hazard or potentiaZ health hazard? b. Exposure Of People to Potential health hazards? C A risk of exPlosio, r release of hazardous substances In the event of an accident? d. An Increase in the number of Lidividuals or species of vector or pathenogenic, organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to p otentially dangerous noise levels? 9. The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? Page S. YES uaYBE YO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results ine a. The obstruction or degradation of any vista or view? scenic b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? C. A conflict with the objective of designated p or potential scenic corridors? E 12. Utilities and Public Services. hill the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following; a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communications systems? t d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid Waste facilities? —=- —_ h. Fire protection? i I. Police protection? J. Schools? z� k. Parks or other recreatiorsl facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilitie "including roads and flood control faciliti..0 m. Other g0veramG:a„1 services? 'C 13. Enerev and Scarce Resources. Will the pro posal have significant results in: y� a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An Increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation. of the consumption i r- of non- renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? �, e- Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or - scarce natural resource? 14, Mandatory Find a- Does the project have the Potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially 'reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife Population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered,plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Californip. history or prehistory? b. Does the project Eave the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact an environment Is one which occurs, to a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? .(Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are coiIF.^_derable when viewed In connection with the effects CZ Vast projects, and probable future projects). d. Does the Project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects an 'human beings, either directly 4 di 'ace 5 1 YES `AYBZ No or a rattly. It. DISCUSSION OF EVALUATION x the M--e (I e" of affirmative answers to questions P Ls a discu s -of-p;op,sed mitigation measures). _rAv- 'T..... W- + FLA"-JVL�o LAo4v-LV.%-L _F .,T PLA-44 MID %,4 - �1 ; 7 N-le r 10" lace 7 ' On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COLLD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLAUTION will be prepared I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures descr :bed on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECURATIO1 WILL BE PREPARED, EDI find the proposed project MY have a significant effect on the envirnaent, and an Wz IRONMIT IMPACT REP01,T is required. Date %'�A � lgBC. afore Title �d CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Cl .0 A10%, STAFF REPORT SO Elf 0". Z ` Un > DATE: May 14, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission I FROM: Bred Buller, City Planner k BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13060 - THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A I residenti-31 tract subdIvision of , acres within the Victoria Planned Community (Low Residential, 2 -4 dwelling units per acre) into 86 lots, located at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad - APN: 202 - 211 -13, 3$3. E I. BACKGROUND: on March 27, 1985, the Planning Commission approved e Area D evelopment Plan for the Victoria Groves Village. This Area Plan establishes the future land use patterns and circulation system for the Groves Village. On November 13, 1985, the Planning ? Commission approved Tentative Tract Map No. 13022. This map subdivides the Victoria Grove_ .nto 275 irdividual single- family parcels currently under development, with the remaining areas being subdivided into larger parcels for future subdivision, per the Victoria Groves Area Development plan. Tentative Tract 13060 subdivides Lot 276 of Tentative Tract 13022 into 86 single family lots. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map and conceptual gradlng plan for 86 single- family lots. B. Project Density: 4.41 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vz ^ant; Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) and Medium R-sidential (4 -14 du /ac) within the Victoria Planned Communty (Tentative Tract 13022). South - Railroad and vacant; City park per Terra Vista Planned Community. East - Vacant; Low Residential (2 -4 dki /ac) within the Victoria Planned Community (Victoria Vineyards North Village). West - Vacant; Lew - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) within the Victoria. Plannad Community (Tentative Tract 13059). ITF14 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 14, 1986 TT 13060 - The William Lyon Co. Page 2 D. General Plan Designations: Project Site%= Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). North - UAW- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac); proposed park. site. South - Railroad; City park East Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). West Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). E. Site Characteristics: The Victoria Groves Village i„ pre om nan y vacan and void of any significant land forms or vegetation, save for a grove of mature pepper trees. This grove was to be preserved as the major element of the Groves Park at the terminus of the Victora Park Lane. No structures or improvements currently exist. The proposed tract is bound to the_ ,uuth by the Southern Pacific Railroad and to the east by Milliken Avenue. Within this area, the property slopes to the south /west at approximat:.ely a 3% grade. II7. ANALYSIS: A. General: Eighty -six lots are proposed. The land use Zesignation is Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) with the designated minimum lot size being 7200 square feet. The subdivision design is consistent with the Area Development Plan conceptually approved by the Planning Commission (see Exhibit "B "). Thi3-tract is being planneJ for subdivision only; no unit development is being considered at this time. The applicant intends to grade these tracts, construct streets, and sell "padded lots" to another developer. Per Ordinance requirements, building permits could not be issued for any unit development until such time as this project has been resubmitted to the Planning Commission for review and approval per the Design Review process. The proposed grading scheme shows a fill slope being created at the southerly tract perimeter within the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way. To create these slopes within the railroad right -of -way would require that the 'William Lyon Company acquire a grading easement from the railroad allowing the Lyon Company to grade on railroad property. The William Lyon Company has submitted to the City verification that the acquisitian of this easement from the railroad has been secured. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 14, 1956 TT 13060 - The William Lyon Co. Page 3 B. Design Review Committee:. The Design Review Committee ha, review a project and recommended its approval. The Committee determined that the slope bank along the southerly tract perimeter, on the railroad property, is visible from the adjacent City Park and should be landscaped both to control for erosion and to soften their appearance. The Committee reviewed and approved a landscape design scheme incorporating -t; -e use of a decorative ground cover on the slopes with trek �A antings along the top of slopes adjacent to the perimeter block wall. This block wail is to be or" the same design as the perimter wall on Highland Avenue, and is to be staggered with tree well insets. Windrow style tree piap`:ngs will occur along the entire dimension on the property t._ie of the block ^-a1 i, with accent trees beinLi planted on `tip sloped side of thF wall within the provided tree well insets. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee raviewed the project and determined that, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with all applicable Standards and Ordinances. The easements obtained by the Lyon Company from the railroad related to the slopes are for grading only,'uo .ight has been granted by the railroad to either plant :r. tn�?r property, or to pernit access onto their property for i lscpae maintenance. A Condition of Approval is included re4ui'irt,):g the Lycn Comp :ny to obtain these additional rights from the railroad before the map can record. D. tuvironmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed By the afp ican . Staff has completed Part Il of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts orr the environment as a result o this project. A cnpy of Pact II of F the Environmental Checklist is attached for your review and consideration. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent: with the Victorid Planned ommun y and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or 'cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are i.1 compliance with the applicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Community, the Development Code, and City Standards. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The ai y eport newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300' of the project site. PLANNING CaMMISSION STAFF REPORT ,a May 14, 1986 TT 1300 - The William Lyon Co. Page 4 VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend!, that the Planning Commission app -ove this project through adoption of the: attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration, Respectfully bn�itted, � s i lei Brad Buller City Planner BB:BC:04S Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Area Development Plan Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract 13022 (Master Plan of Subdivision) Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map /Grading Plan Initial Study, Part Il Resolution of Approval i;; *ti Conditions t t f S.M0116NI.�. 3Nt �� SaHVl 3N1 T T ss n rt, iTC ti 1 V z z W L d Exit W 1� Lu �! — c ZI 3 3 ' _�_� ZF 0 C3 to z ms s vI r � z- �� E � CC j m cj a W N J 34 ul CO m m® ID F g US LUI W W W LU F4 CrrY or -° iT RAINCHO CUC L JO GA � t: —1 t TITLE= � �1 %'8.►c�s P"NNI \G DIVISION EXHIGIT " '�' rmuw Z ad: .QA TENTATIVE TRACY NO. 13060 LLLR CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA TENTATIVE TRACT TENTATIVE NOVEMBER 19, 1985 6W PERIMETER ZONE SITE UTILIZATION MAP iTsAlm 'ROVES T!E aWLLmIAM a vYON - qQMsum PANY INC. o ONSUL7VC CROUP .t.�R. 0"' EXHIBrr. 2 SCALE- AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN VICTORIA GROVES Rancho Cucamonga,Ca. J!; - - _ - —LYON _ COMM, .SLYIWAM LTON,C..y.� f )j 1 �1 .• j�!`I T. LAND USE LEG '43A� °� END AND {� t.� UNIT TABULATION s. �t '' PHASE 1 LMKOOao.m r •_ \ l , !tl : .�a,,.� f 7 •y LOw.e CVWFl nn.O MAC ,u con tOw�EnaL OE/lVrY t7SJ.0 - h 9r' t i T S\ 1 ~ u\On- ---mz. �o cu M~ as.e ._ k - a,aa`a°v.e r f y' +i �'� 't .em.e o:Ooan PT u u w.e, wrxc. msrr PHASE 11 PHASE ! j'.t 1. "" u� ::uw Owan,r �� ,ter �7_= x" I IT • - � l.. �n t l . � ;Ira. ' x r r- a rnorosm sonO�rm �rbrOSm PAW .c .... \ „y"1` j i m LlvlxmN -- - % i� \ •ll�• I ' fir,,' �' =+ 1.111 I I I I i f- � �'•_ -� >. �•- ..r "7GYTI,FIW —_ - lactic - .�._�.y_: —� ^.�uiom�: ::. __ � r -�lti �. CITY OI' ° - RANCHO CUCA�'10 \NGr1 ITE,�[: TITLE: --2`� PLAT KING DIVISM �� n E1IiIIIIT __-_ ,_SCALE -...__ e s `a /a P � r t !r) 7 f It 144-- CITY or RAINCNO CUCANION GA DIVISION ITE.%I ---g TITLE: E;tFifl3iT." SCALE- K1.t I•, i z�' . Y 'Y ti a � s�YY IN 1a ■dadiil a} j� �¢j e s `a /a P � r t !r) 7 f It 144-- CITY or RAINCNO CUCANION GA DIVISION ITE.%I ---g TITLE: E;tFifl3iT." SCALE- K1.t I C .rte �tY? � ! air• .?1 ? 5 -� t +� T ,�. ,U J - 1 1 i �i lJ dno�� �uuTasko�ssxolr ,+` 'a.�w Cott ttistn}.M�y�. JiU AD VTAU3— 07,1— IT11Mi Hl SAM) VIHOLLOJA Y YJyyyr a3sn3u 090EL 'ON IOVU 3ALLV1N31 C 10 l A33.9 133M5 ru.ti our �rwrrr F U jar S Sia lit ! ! ��ri lj< i 4'ji r ii + ;i I _ r .rte �tY? � ! air• .?1 ? 5 -� t +� T ,�. ,U J - 1 1 i �i lJ ,U J - 1 1 i �i lJ TTT jjjj } e� u..� .. _. .. _. ... ... its YtYi S��'i!lyll j jar S Sia lit ! ! ��ri } e� u..� .. _. .. _. ... ... its tzx z. 0.1 fit Am -26 D- (0 M" Em All 3u S44 NO. 3 D- (0 M" Em SEE SHUT N0.3 IE v A f o Ali ta 41, It 0-1\ CITY OF RANC:iO CUCA?tONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMI, - TAL CHECKLIST DATE: MOB►•( ? IeI�C� APPLICA=:T:�G �tGLtiic.l Ly.� FILING DATE: e.U644 A — _.WL LOG NUkffiER:�?jp�� PROJECT: �F4A4TSz3tVtst iii sS t�.r �,1t., �� PROJECT LOCATI:ON::(_�T�� � I. MIRO`MENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required sheets). on attached YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and GeoloQ+i', Will the proposal have ® significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions , or in changes '',4.4 geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compact_`on or burial of the ' soil? C. ,Change in topography oz ground surface contour intervals? ' d. The destruction, coveting or modification of anv unique geologic or physical features? e. Any Potential increase in wind or water erosion or soils, affecting either on or off 4 site conditons? u T' f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? _ r- g• Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards suet. as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or'similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? 2. Hydr22O. . Will the proposal have significant H , results in: °aye 2 YES a. Changes in currents, or fle course of direction Of flowirg streams, rivers, or ephemerai stream channels? b. Changes in absorptift ratas, drainage or the rate and Suitt __.. of :surface wateratterns, runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? r`— u, Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. �. Discharge into surface waters, or an, alteration of surface water quality? Ile f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g• Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with a n aquifet? Quality? .Quantity? _._ X h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? ._ T Y I. Exposure of peo)ole or property to water related hazards such .Ys'flooding seiches? I or r IV 3. All Quality. Will the groaosal have significant results in: U. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with tiie attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota -- Flora. Will the proposal have significant results In: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? Reduction of the numbers of any ¢nique, rare or endangered of plants?yy ' s c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the _ potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal 'have significant results in: ?ae 31 YES `= m SO 7y- 7 r a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare EMM or eadang -red species of animals? f C. Introduction of new or disruptive species of " animals into an area, or resuilt in a barrier ;r to the migration, or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wild?tc_ habitat? R 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for alditional housing? 6. Socio- .conomic Factors. Will the proposal have t significan results in: a. Change to total or regional socio- econnm$'' tharact aris tics, tncludins _ -n0aic or 4ommercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., b..vers, tax payers or project users? 7. ?znd Use and Plannina Cons ide^atious. Will the pi�posal have significant results in? a. A substantiate a ?aeration of the present or planned land use of an area? A conflict with any designations, objew`lves, Policies, or adopted plapa of gny governmei. -al e entities? C. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of = existing consumptive or non - consumptive a recreational opportunities? ?ae 31 YES `= m SO 7y- 7 r Page 8. Transoortation. Will the proposal have significant res;llts in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, ar demand for new street construction? C. Effects or existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta� tion systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and Po'=ntial water- borne, rail, mass transit of air traffic? i g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists .e or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources, VI-1Z me proposal have significant results in:� A a. A disturbance to the integri�.q of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. Health, Safety and Nuisance Factors. Will the _ Proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? '- c: A risk of explosion nr release of hazardous; c :bstances in the event of au accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals _ or spec:,es of vector or pathenogenic organise_ or the exposure of People to such organisms? _ e. Increase in existing noise levels? ;. f. j l\ Exposure of peop'�e to potentially dangerous noise levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors? 7° IMF'' h. An increase in light or glare? Paye j YES u4Y3= -No 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: . a. The obstruction or degradation of any, scenic vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? C. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal h ate significant , nee; for new systems„ or alteratio.is to the following; a- Electric pope -? b. natural or pa kaged gas? C. Communications systems? - d. Water supply? .2!e e. Wastewater facilities? .. Flooq` control structures? g- Snli3 waste facilities? h. Fire protection? e i. Police protection? J. Schools? k. Parks or other rec,'ational facilities? 1„ Maintenance of public facilities, �Kncluding roach and flood control faciaitir ? M. Other governmental services? 13.• FnareY and Scarce Resources. Will t*ie proposal have significant resul s Win: a. t1se of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? _.._ b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing, sources of energy`, c. An increase in the demand f; r developuent of new so�,ces of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sourcea of energy are &.vailaule? 3 ,a? YES `f Y3E NO e.. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? - - 14. Mandatory _FindinQS of Sienificance. a. Does the project have the potential to n>•grade the quality ca ty._ environment, s'-Sstantially reduce the habitat,of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or w'ildlifa population to drop b(,'.,jw self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a Plant or animal community, reduce the number or se; trio the ran8e -of a rare or endangered p'iant Ls animal or eliminate important examples of the major per- ds of CalifOrnia history or prehistory? b. :.aes the project have the potE.ntial to achieve short -term, to the disadvant ?ate of long -term, environmsrtal goals? (A s %ort -term impact on the envir,)nmer_ is one which occurs in a relativel,, brief, definitive per-fod of time while long- term impacts w;'.11 _ndure well into the future). r.. P-es the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cuzulatively considerable? 'Cumulatively considerable J means `hat the Lacremental effects of an Alm indivi6"l project are considerable when viewed in co:,nection with the effb,ts of pasr projects, an3.probable future projects). d, Does tLe rrnject have environmental. effects which will cruse substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION OF E,ttMONMITAL EVALUATIM (i.e -, of af:.armative ans*sers to the above questions plus a d >scussioh of proposed mitigation measures)., THt� °"("R�' "� 1� Gm�� -� i.at��ti•l � iM�.��tsTs ,- f-fi�ir• � e.' MD MI-ne.A qJ C" p'Ca f On the basis of this initial evaluation: I.fin'd the prop¢ p°_Dject COt'L3 :70I have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the envitonmeut, there will not be a significant +effect in this case because the mitigation' measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the Project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PTLEPARED. I find the proposed projECt :Lay have_a significant effect on t.;ie_ envir:taent, and an E: Z ZPON',IE�'NT Z.`LEACT REPORT is required. S gnstura ; Title r s RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF E PLANNING COMMISSION 'OF THE. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING 11ENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13060 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map ''o. 13060, hereinafter "Mar° submitted by The Wiiiiam Lynn Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing he real property sittated in the City of F.ancho Cucamonga, Count; of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 19.5 acres within thn Victoria Planned Community (Low Residential, 2 -4 dwelling unity per acre), located at the northwest corner of Milliken Aven.e and 0e SoL,thern V cific Railroad (RPK 202.211 -13, 38) into 86 Tots, regularly came before tie Planning Commission f °r public hearing and action on May 14, 1986; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth im the Engineering and Planning Oivision's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and ,:or, "sidered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and aas considered ot!er evidence F^Rserted at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City' of Rancho C;,:amonga doe_ resolve as follows: SECTS d 1-. The P1 anni ng Commission makes that fol,l owl i, ii ndi ngs, in regard to en awe Tract No. 13060 and the Mar, thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent witk the General `plan, Development Code, and specific plans;' (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tratjt is consistent with the General Plait, D�relopment lode, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable .,r the type of devel :)pmtent proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environir,�ntal damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or th_r habitat; (e) The tentative tract i 's -.not likely to cause serious public health prublrims; PLANING COMMISiSt011 RESOLUTION Me,y 14, 1986 TT 13060 -• The William Lyon Company Page 2 (f) The design of the tentative tract will not cot Act with any easement acquired by the public at 1srge, now of record, for access through er -use of the property within the proposed subdivision." (g)' That this project will not create adverse irapacts on the environment and "a Negative Declaration is issued. SE&ION 2: Tentative- Tract Man -No. 13060, a copy o£ which is attached e- retois hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions, Planning Division 1. Prior to recordation of Tract 13060, all conditions of approval applicable to and imposed upon Tentative Tract 13122 shall be complied with, including, but not limited to, the completion of off -site improvements and greenbelt trail areas. 2. Pri,ar to recordation of Tract 13060,, the FiPrai Map for Tract 13022 shall be re :or0ed. ;. This ►reap is being approved as a Tract Subdivision only. Any future proposals for 'rz e� vet'opr „,"Fof five or more residential units be require Design Review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits for.any units. 4. Concurrent with any application for Design Review, the applicant shall also submit an acausf: cal study detailing what mitigation measures, if any, are required to achieve noise levels, bgth exterior and interior, consistent with City Standards for lots abuttng eiti:er MilliKer! Avenge ur the railroad right -of -way. 5. Landscape treatments at the end of side -on cul -de -sacs shall be designed to provide an open view into the interior of tAe cul -de -sac. Design treatment shall include the use of decorative wrought iron fencing and sidewalk connections from the sidewalk to the perimeter street. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION May 14, 1986 TT 13060 The William Lyon Company Page 3 Alm "A" 6. Lot is to be developed as a public easement to provide a trail connection from the Victoria Greenbelt System to the future regional trail along the railroad right -of -way_ This easement is to be a minimum 15' wide, with meand *rinq wall: a minimum of 6' wide. The easements as iil be fully developed with sidewalk, landscaping, low level lighting and fencing concurrent with the developmnt of street improvements, 7. A six -foot high masonry wall shall be EIrovided along Millikea Avenue and the southerly *."pact boundary adjacent to the railroad right -of -way consistent with the approved wall design for Highland Avenue. These wails should be staggered and offset to increase visual interest. Tree well insets per the approved conceptual landscape design for the slope planting along the southerly tract perimeter are to be provided. Landscape maintenance easements will be required where perimeter walls encroach into private property and are to be dedicated on the Final Map. Final planting of all walls and locations of all landscape easements are to be determined prior to recordation of the Final Map. B. five -Foot high decorative fences will be required along street side lot Dines for all lots that either side -on or rear -on to Victoria. Groves Loop Road. In rear -on conditions walls will be of masonry block construction. In situations where street grade is below pad grade resulting in a sloped parkway, fence lines are to be coincident with the top of slope. Landscape maintenance easements will be required ' where fences encroach onto private lots and are to be dedicated on the Final Map. Final platting of all fences and locations of all easements are to be determined prior to recorrt=-tion of the Final Map. ` 9. Ti,, slope along the southerly perimeter of one tract. ` is to be landscaped consistent with the approveL conceptual design employing a decorative ground cover planting on the slope bank, shrub massing, trees and a continuous windrow planting with intermittent nodes of accent trees at the top of slope. Windrow trees on property side of wall to be irrigated by a separate irrigation system, to be maintained by that property owner for each individual lot. Accent trees and slope planting on slope side of wall to be on an Irrigation system for maintenance by the City. Block wall is to be of f o Av�4ans Gsenst uccir�n as lanes a�c�rovand ri�alt on detailing the final design of the slope landscape treatment shall be submitted for the review and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION May 14, 1986 TT 13060 - The Wiiliam.Lyon Company Page 4 approval of the City Planner prier to the issuance of any gr.!,,j,-rng permits. Full slope improvements including`dallss, landscaping and irrigation shall be instal1ed'concurrent with pad gradsrg of the tract. 10. Any retaining walls used are to be a maximum of 4' high. 11. All retaining walls visible to the cenerai public, i.e., on the streetside of corner .side yards and within tine front yard, are to be constructed of a. decorative material to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 12. All back of lot grade differentials are to be a maximum ur 12'. Engineering Division 1. Victoria Groves Loop Road shall be constructed full width to Highland Avenue with the first phase of development. Sidewalks and parkway lands apirq may be deferred until adjacent parcels are aevelopsd. 2. The entire width of Victoria Park Lana shali be constructed from tiie Loop Road to Milliken Avenue with the first phase of development. 3. Milliken Avg ^nue shall be constructed as foilows with tie first phase of development: A. Portion from Victoria Park sane to Southern Pacific Railroad: (1) Full improvements for west roadbed, (2). Full median with only one opening at the Loop Road, and (3) A ihinimum 18' wide pavaiiient for the east roadbed. B. Portion from - Southern Pacific Railroad to Base Line Road: (1) Full median, 1) A minimum 13' Wide pavement ors both sides of tie medlanr_ 3) Drainage control devices such as paved ditches, AC berms or curbs shall be installed as approved by the City Engineer. rl PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION May 14, 1986 TT 13060 - The William Lyon Compiny Page 5 v C. '„ailro4d Cressing: (1) Construct full improvemEnts for both roadbeds including medians (except s ";�r parkway sidewalks and landscaping) for at least 200' on both sides of the railroad. (2) The developer shall ,00rdinate with the City to have the railroad crossing signal and arms installed prior to occupancy V. the satisfaction of the City Engineer. D. he cost of the permanent improvemeits in ewess of , the standard one -half street imp,?ovements adjacent to the tract boundary sha,?'l be subject to reimbursement from the City for' the adjacent property owners upon de OoNent of their property. 4. Storm drain easments as required for cross lo`, drainage shall be dedicated on the final map. 5. The storm drain muster plan for the area shall be' completed and approved prior to recordation of the final map. 6. Construct sufficient storm drain facilities to serve each phase of d: <vel opipent as required by the City EnL,ineor. The facilities shall be designed to contain Q100 within th. street or easement right -of -way. 7. The slope areas along Milliken Avenue shall be removed from the lots and dedicated as street right -of -way, 8. Southern Pacific Railroad Slope Maintenance: A. The applicant shall obtain from Southern Pacific Rail Road t signer: I! censet agreement for planting and ^aintenance of the slope ort the railroad easeiment prior to recordation nf the map; and B. The applicant shall provide adequate vehicular access to the railroad slope maintenance area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to recordation of the map, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION i May 14, 1986 TT 13060 - The William Lyon Company Page 6 AF :LOVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C:UCAMONGA � BY: Dennis L. stout, airman I ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Rasolutiotl was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Conuiss•ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held 1 on the 14th day of May, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: i NOES: COMMISSIONERS: (� ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ;1 Y 2 O 0 0 e. c U 6 F y H 6 O 4vLN!�to.1 x ; '^ W �7 H N p 0. a`r -•A�n dL �.. C� �A +' »e »L of 4 p4 •G dCJ ode. `rC. 'L C.a �' LZ Y o•Od m «u.:; -+ ^ay ozT �,�y.• aic r CE G�q.. u�Y c C� Z p N'l ��d _ I. t p Lp1L n O N r °�!U °�,uM «cd c' ^u by aw poo Y�y °cn yo=u n i E,ian N n ay ^a .�� Azu`� p v a" p �•4+^ ua Cud C `r .� • r G E� r N a�.`+SyJi C6.r•Y s 6CN �. .n •Lr' �> C2vYC+ C. �.p ^.uQ 1`. `�UEE.O. +DL A+Lq C�p ^G O♦ a 6' c+Pn hpD �CNU wo'.O LN L pC MN P 44 C Op M..♦ d.a� a0 >r RA> � �♦� u � '4? L E C� sy� _ '� L9 C Y:p »LyD, ~d_ ee9 Oy uyCOC pYC L y U d E C x .•1 Y D — ,GV Ya d V Y R4 d. +a C » C C °p Q.Lyjp� d E L d Vd '+'O Y� C p^ L VQ �Qr. '° C 'U OC�CL.CA `L a v Y ..P.d a° V u aQl D D ;7s WquO La L L C b1 N V N n9YuUiL Z P � d d M M• CpN Vy P N Y� QMµVY2 r ^a• pC A <P� r �tiV C OY tC -pl`. p.LT 0 Y 2 O 0 0 e. c U 6 F y H 6 O � �PaYY L b rr♦� E o m° o a♦. �♦"adn u L N{ y~ {�r L 4 gg ~ t• O Q p iY' U C 0. DZ c d a b �u(5s♦D. � N.."c oa�:v GoQ ° 4 AV f M 3 ^ Y 0 J W �7 H N Y tie• ,,1 .� p V Ai t r n O N N � � ` j v w 21 Q W f V r G E� N � ti Q J K V ♦•� 4 � �PaYY L b rr♦� E o m° o a♦. �♦"adn u L N{ y~ {�r L 4 gg ~ t• O Q p iY' U C 0. DZ c d a b �u(5s♦D. � N.."c oa�:v GoQ ° 4 AV f M 3 O �YU^ C 6a•. =d PV.C`PU U' •Q��W�lu aCU q °'V'O rC V C �n L GNgn � C L G �o ay •, u: q N N uo .°cwNV uNn u,Ge q 42d Va 4q E U t yq U y w u u° 4 C '94% Z- + q v N ff . qN v • �C--. O ° to q EaN o °� °qu» 1Oj ° an•°s gO V L C �.- N a +•- � •• .GALL aw Z Ct ^� OL � yu aLa rp O°� °z° ^ ^d w GCNEy U !e'iN Aui U .. -�rnvr •.GD . YNp U rvruYL N2fC OL a ., C 1— 21A N u n T c° u° q ' Q u Y Y L YC V�uW • Cw =VrC Can^ �Y= N^�aa� a'2 W aGw� wu NE. Vy �Gr ��aN4q N t°1V�CO ucOL L w '..O L °� VY 01 °C� ^a L A �.ff• -yyL° ^ a0 ~NNN Y`uq q6= �° COv. • u G_ 'M� L N G U NYYCN NC.NL a .�.•.�� °aa q °Od c� >°-� ° r P N W q0'O FaG G N q q E u •G.°t! v.q-, £Fi4y� L$ �:! q U� .` L. ate'. � w Nq °Lr.Yr� a.+w• ^ooy�.a V ✓ C d y ^°M `�. ° u01 C O V ^ U� °e N L 9+rw. aN pp> C� G A Rs. pm y 2a M � �° 9~NL�T'O ot� w2.4 �.r• m C - •^ �mee y u sv ' � cV a GSL„aoY+a�-�3 u' "La..B.w ° u 52 L EEl•+y V2 ft! e N Zu ^q pL G G q L Y �q N. � .L 6 50 ti u°.0 Yi C a.5= 3 OL°Nn G =,a'= 4 y V c Cc L ° °` u u u C L Y Y !� • •^R. i0 r rot .tea BS 6•� V V C V r rr% 6 a —5 c C L G G� ` C CS •, u: q N N c ° u,Ge q q y u ei w n u r ••L_qy . V TaNi Yq�u� Lr G•o _ .u.._ooe L2eGi °O� �4Y•°' u qToo c Gr i M G E V q N 6 C i C w u Gc •�.t u�cn^v .+aq ... o"a22=! °Mw tit ut �o gyov co6� •- a c�i sq° Al N La V =yu G ^a O_ a o ,^ nz O. � O O q� V• d L� w. D °o c Y t� Y ° «._.^ L v EQnc am° N vc L m tiFi�o OO N •. UY o 10° t • i.LY w N O. � 6 Q!f � M by «^g00�aL � V ~ L b L° w— 0 0 a o •uH� °av A ° C T i ° q .•L.• gOVO e° aa.� �' M= LE B 4 ' w R i+• a ° O V.0 i N ° 0 w NCE� IC � c • ° - ° a d C Ss O i.ft ti d> N 1 0 •Vi OI 2i °�N >� w0^•`ndm yyV VuA Ny 'N JCL n ` �?� G V `LJ °'� �' coq �^ V°L'aw V •-.a «.°� cz.. mat .�+u'caNNN n�d _ CLe � C L y mr O '^ N a N P p y •^ t E N L a� a LO ° 62w NY9 Or nr"" N06° u amp ooM YL wY Y O' L bNd EYw ^� Q•u °pN °'Q N j caq�t„ 4^ °r NL ° 0 � � �m c L Lmu r bggv�q Q «N _ — u° ^,�a �.i ^. I w `c.M cLC Yy°•i ° a ad °cbLq °= •i c° °`^ v cHCa c ° ° uv N L u L NNa^ N^ n O u- aui`4,n ` N 6 H •^ 6 N O H f C w =q d_ F a S N t K N Y .�- b� > g w N 6 0.. K, q D d 4 J 1a. 0 9 011 m 1 a1. �L�C,LaeV ... � E {•O 6N � � Ly y m>w' ouNCnv O U w 6 b V is am° ac vc L m _ ^QC �..; L q, .0 • a� N°q� �y N2 b b3�a.L d N •� ^ B 4 ... a .. • ° a d C Ss O i.ft ti N 1 0 u 6 C O.yN. '" • °d' a n�d _ CLe awi cC C u Yta. mr O q_.. v amp ooM „:�L L°. •. � 4^ °r Nib C V 7V V {.f ° dp _ — VC.M .aL� O•d 6C«. Ly N. C O u- aui`4,n 4.tiN0 '4 N #> > d°M rpM KU KO f C w =q r> 4° O F a m 1 a1. �L�C,LaeV ... � E {•O 6N � � Ly y m>w' ouNCnv O U w 6 ✓z Y« Er A� �w ». _" ortni Yoe V E N r Coy ✓ A C V V T CI ?° N Y w U w N -N 4� n Va E t✓ y. �,d4 � O E —C.0 ^�A � B.YiS • '.d � Oar YQC Yu,.�"d 'E xU V y`d96 ..fi4 EOL4 00 E �,. �A v, w°..p 4 e.nN�� Oj7Y 6x 4 CV M�O� nu9 ` .� O✓ �4eY.� CNC V O NE✓ c >✓. '^L¢ +°+..ao L. 8?4 zN�LN.� '^✓ = L °= w6 Y�L USO L6w.N r:.N F. �Y w`�JO VYY • T ��' xco Wei' c ✓"•v` V YEq GL,'�nS w ✓.°,N n ^� N ✓u1 _ '0 ";:H • -c °YV✓ u � � — � N.^.r Cq6 9�.+�IYi GVG Y +q` �+Y� �.°aw dC ✓ m ao N✓— a �q 4O^ CV9, '�V C�Y �Or1 F4, ✓CiLO EVyd�N' OI ✓V,"6.,y 'O ` y =w ez —rno °� w J`. � su °o•+ vwu�a°, �w °�" �L Ygi °•� =w� _gA ,GY. ^«2�w 8 uy a.✓N� o�y. ✓e � a =S Na L« �195 =xwgE^ M' Y bx .� uUZa G Y c9 u �A NW yWtx SEE gp FONT di L QV 6iE Y °Y .c 6 p.. at b wyp Y ✓' Oqw 6 ✓ y..w aY.4 A� i.a ^r qAM p N N 6 2 Y K ✓ .^ Y G O M Y O G w b U~ Q"O � O L✓ rV-. 6 F � L p r w V w r 4 p« 3 L Il N 6 r^ y E^ L C >.✓ u L V 6.6 FAA .LGYWL >�. O.a Y.N wMY.G N 6V.q =emu v4o 4L. .4« « rev L rn V. aNx. �� ✓., so ✓L e. ✓� Y Uw 9.4 ✓p�L ✓4 El I- II Y n G CI q O C q ✓ 2 O G YZ: q .-.. Gad LY 2Y.lVxC �Y VaL aYg+r w 8-7; S N ?✓ O N N q G u Q'N x o 9 E r✓ •> E; q C .. V °ari ^` w .1 . �' M� ai NC p 9± V G Y 06 a0a " °4 —qO� C4 &.°.` .�q.6 .ri q9 y.w. G.q ayY o9 .G.a �°wyi✓ n GG � � r +y _ n E •' n x �YN • C.. o E L A•, ✓acv w N •°,a an C o.-E Gy YN LUw `a. C GNr. :Gy n xNN `Lr6014 .Yf «O4Y� `y nC 4G 4 L G 0 A t v — N ✓ °' a wE x J �, r o n Ga Cwa 4w u qw� L «u ✓ww p� Vie„°, �sY ri'G °N� d lo o .. w« 1E V u r° « Y N N •_ �� <^ a 0 ✓ Y a x. ^ ✓= L O.^ E° g 0 A C C g A Y w 0 w 0 6 N Y L F L� t4. O. L NOVy GC Cwt Y �tL t L1+ —2 t C 6C ��'� �' L L OO p MN, 3w 3r C E W W W E Z L Y✓ •��}� H NI A • N 17 v: '1 }l ' U a •n L G. lu 16"x, Ln 9 � U � � N e � '•� - � VV f N a =Y try O YwN Y O U36 Y• O YYU6 .qOt ME L a A a Sc `•� yOprGp w4 afL u aAOq •O `O qcr� C ^ ^ N° W► y > Nq.NLC N cc ^ ^Y`TC OI �. C4 N' Y C .• r�V lC� E �. _ of 4o Y V O�W t, �� C O� •w N 419 <}� C� �L p i V« i�l • N a Wl J Go 1.9 _. as u n •° •�•• q Y ,c c cu^ r c vO1 '" a `tO a P 2ggo. v 9.2 v .en ►r ca u" uE4° » 2 tao Y a Er �w0. •�� v�6q V �� aU YE �° C•. nU • a 1. VY _ .4 �� 4 r GrO Y Ypp % N Q. y G L.� N U �' E'' n ° � a•6 � P � v N a �: >> .044 N �.... ... a Cm.i o Rrdl V ^�yY c 4.cV0 u u E_ Y a• �\. .-.g° WYY 14 C • N• 11 Ln u Q C L Q n Y v e a: M `; G a. L nM« 1: BYO « v c E C Cam' d a o 'xv w � M wqV O G Y � ANY f � I El Y a N r a V O 3r Y E 1 L yY Y Or U t y YNy„e Cy�N� Sw 9 V 9 ~ V� � p y p 0 p'� • � d l L V V Y b .py �i _rt u' b ,. r• avv ° » u =a�� a o a c ,2-4- L O a y n y LU u>• _ 'eLi � L'N x Y nr� y y' z A o aL•r •3 oiY.. m Z r, p2 V wN r.Y d at 6 Ygy2 Y • L p> V L vLt +•w n� M a � up LW � pN vy � c � N • L rr yo4.. n". °+. „T "'o s N O :L �n -Y O.. ^w nb� c qq"�'° : «.m �Q�g N�YO rrf Nei °. r6 In �YN ILL 2 L °rL v ..< CN v. 01gw U w .h 'HT Y'• >7 a0 G 1�CL � p C�1V4. •'. 6�2� Sv•L•� ••�L °Nr` m L° p1gC OY a M^" C • aa: 2L N bc= v'fii� ° � C °c �7 w« v ... ° ^ i M•2'..o i o py d nN cy¢ugr YSa� °n .� --,s �� vs�� vrw. � Sw•-c� «xL� :o�L, Y4N agaY a•$ �u �cN i °iLi v° L �.tY.. .°."n'u'• -. .p `c ar °' a m nS y„ y» u U �. Ny �` Iw F STN LYOrVw h ttW S� N•y.y� 'C6 »r Ly NO iY V}O LwY« !U S� 43 y'^cW P+Ni �U 12 n m a. ti ..1 N .:k ! • a0 u Q C L Q n Y v e a: M `; G a. L nM« 1: BYO « v c E C Cam' d a o 'xv w � M wqV O G Y � ANY f � I El Y a N r a V O 3r Y E 1 L yY Y Or U t y YNy„e Cy�N� Sw 9 V 9 ~ V q• as PY 6 T Z c E... SE V cS 5S w q Lq b .py y O Y � qyp r M ... r L O N .. Y v 2 Q s 6 i C O' F ILL 2 A OC U w .h S L Y'• G T � y • m u Q C L Q n Y v e a: M `; G a. L nM« 1: BYO « v c E C Cam' d a o 'xv w � M wqV O G Y � ANY f � I El u 0 O J "u du a �a N V 2 Q S r a` C 6 L I W q G �- L •G. N. x 2 r O az� r WO e u � cy- . IF G aGi �9 y u .� �^• wp c C TY N Oµ ' cam• .� 4 NE� q ? v F� q > � 6 '" d N v U 2- — .-o 9.2 eG x U °O U Q O M L••.• 7 fV..=. GON 6 N OSp O 1•j N b A i O u a.n d 9aG °r _ Oj u G''• 4E a 2 j 6y Y N.T. YN y F.... ° mo dL uaq ° 999 . d.n ac.99 a w `au oc d .G ct l� Ly. ..UL - q .p � •,. d 0 U 03.x..— vE2 Nc Lq�' p.• c. °V ... _ _ a .2 . °.a° u 0 O J "u du a �a N V 2 Q S r a` C 6 L I W q G �- L •G. N. x �16w. mil' N E — � C1.• C O ig a t p N dt L E .G. cnL N` 4 N° ! Zl d v + U �S.e• Fy u s V a � q N Y � v D M O. G '4 u >. V N E O k T � per. VY. od yY O� LN G E4 L n ^w G aGi c YY N U° pS TY N o � ° 2Oq � c q > Azz u' '" d N v U 2- — .-o 9.2 eG x U °O U Q O M L••.• 7 fV..=. GON 6 N OSp O 1•j N b A �16w. mil' N E — � C1.• C O ig a t p N dt L E .G. cnL N` 4 N° ! Zl d v + U �S.e• Fy u s V a � q N Y � v D M O. G '4 u >. V N E O k T � per. VY. od yY O� LN G E4 L 0 I, BACKGROUND; Tentative Tract 12802 was originially approved by the P'a in nn 9Commission ors February 13, 1985, for 221 total lots; (149 lots with a minimum oa 4000 square feet, and 72 lots with a minimum of 6000 square feet). .ne amended Tentative — Tract would reconfigure the 72 lots with a designated minimum lot area of 6000 square feet into 103 lots with a minimum lot area of 4000 square Feet. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of revised subdivision map and approval of precise plot plan and building elevations for the development of 103 single family homes, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. , B. Protect Density: 6.20 du /ac. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning. North - Vacant; future school site and Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) within the Terra Vista Planned Community, planned as a 5000 Series single lot family subdivision (Tentative Tract 12621). South - Vacant; areenway corridor and future pars site, and Low Medium Residential (4 -8 de /ac) within the Terra Vista Planned Community, planned as a future 5000 Series single family subdivision. East - Vacant; Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du/ac) within the Terra Vista Planned Community, planned as a 4000 Series single family subdivision. ITEM P i vis i vi yea 4vvtxv �,U "�[3iYltJ1V lrA L_CAAlp,V�q STAFF AFF EEFOET jr1„ t DATE: May 14, 1986 1 977' TO Chairman and Memhes of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12802 TR I 0 - TEWI HOMES - he total development of a residentia suiv'ision of 16.6 acres in the Lost- Medium Residential District (4 -8 du /ac) within the Terra Vista Planned Community into 103 lots, located on the south side of Mountain View Drive, Past of Spruce Avenue - APN IOf?- 091 -03. I, BACKGROUND; Tentative Tract 12802 was originially approved by the P'a in nn 9Commission ors February 13, 1985, for 221 total lots; (149 lots with a minimum oa 4000 square feet, and 72 lots with a minimum of 6000 square feet). .ne amended Tentative — Tract would reconfigure the 72 lots with a designated minimum lot area of 6000 square feet into 103 lots with a minimum lot area of 4000 square Feet. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of revised subdivision map and approval of precise plot plan and building elevations for the development of 103 single family homes, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. , B. Protect Density: 6.20 du /ac. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning. North - Vacant; future school site and Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) within the Terra Vista Planned Community, planned as a 5000 Series single lot family subdivision (Tentative Tract 12621). South - Vacant; areenway corridor and future pars site, and Low Medium Residential (4 -8 de /ac) within the Terra Vista Planned Community, planned as a future 5000 Series single family subdivision. East - Vacant; Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du/ac) within the Terra Vista Planned Community, planned as a 4000 Series single family subdivision. ITEM P i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 12802 (REVISED) - LEWIS HOMES May 14, 1586 Page 2 West - Tentative Tract 12802 under construction (the westerly 149 lots of Tentative Tract 12802 not a part of this revision); Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) within the Terra Vista Planned Community. D. General Plan Designations: FF50e -ci-r to Proposed junior high school site; proposed park site; Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). North -. low Medium Resident'-1 (4 -8 du /ac). South - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac'); High Residential (24 -30 du /ac). East - Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). West Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac). E. Site Characteristics: The project site was formerly a vineyard. The site has since been clearer; and graded. Development is beginning on the westerly portion for the 4000 Series of the previously approved Tentative Tract 12802 (see Exhibit "E "). The property slopes southward at approximately a 2 -3i; grade. F. Applicable Regulations: The Terra Vista Planned Community permits one( 1) Net ling unit per 3000 square foot minimum lot size to approximately 7200 square foot maximum lot size in a conventional subdivision in the Low- Mediva and Medium Residential designations. IiI. ANALYSIS: A. General: This revision has been requested by Lewis Homes ecause the 6000 Series homes originally planned for this Location have not found good acceptance to the market place. As a result, Lewis Homes has discontinued that line of homes. They are now ,proposing to develop this tract with their "Oxford Series", a 4000 Series home (see attached letter). This series of single family homes was previously approved by the Planning Commission with review of Tract 12670 within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The design of the homes submitted as part of this proposal is consistent with the design of the homes as approved with that tentative tract. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee was Zo-ncerned about a re a ionship of garage locations and their proximity to corner intersections. Specifically, the Committee recommended the use of wider corner lots to: 1) promote greater traffic efficiency, 2) street related impacts onto the dwelling unit, and 3) to provide wider parkways to encourage a more intense streetside sideyard planting scheme for an improved {fir PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 12802 (REVISED) - LEWIS HOMES May 14, 1986 Page 3 streetscape. The relationship between house mass and streetside =ideyard setback for corner lots should achieve a balance between maximizing sideyard setbacks and minimizing view impacts to the street and neighboring lots. In response to the Committee's concern, Conditions of Approval have been included to the Resolution as follows: 1. Side -entry garages shall be provided for units on Lots 37, 73, F., 90, and 102 to maximize efficiency of ingress /egress to /from lots. 2. Lot lines sl +ail be readjusted, where feasible, to maximize streetside sideyards for corner lots. A revised tract map and detailed site plan showing the re- plotting of lots shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to recordation a' thy' final map. 3. In plotting units on corner lots, those floor plans whose des-gn is best suited to , the configvratics of the lot and strikes the lest balance between maximizing streetside sideyirds and minimizing view impacts to the street and to neighboring lots should be used. 4. Some elements of the architectural design included within the front elevation should be continued on the other three sides of the house exterior to provide an enhanced architectural profile to all four sides of the dwelling uni ;`., Revised elevations detailing these added 0 e<ments shall be ` submitted for thr, review and approval of the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review I, ommittee reviewed the projr�c and determined that, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the Trading plan for th,- revised tract map and found no significant changes frum the grading plan approved with the original tentative tract, and determined that the original approval granted for the previous grading plan is still valid. t E. Environmental Assessment:, Part I of the Initial Study has been complete by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the PLANNIdlli COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 1280? (REVISED) - LEWIS H•1MES May 14, 1 }86 Page 4 Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. A copy of Part IY of the Environmental Checklist is attached for your review and consideration. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Terra 'Vista Planned Community and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to - .adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts. In addition, the proposed use, builCIng designs, and subdivision, together with the recommended Conditions rat Approve,, are in compliance with all applicable regulations of the Development Code and Terra Vista Community Plan. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a- public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMME ;.;>TION: Staff recommmends L+dat the Planning Commission approve the revised Tentative Tract 12802, subject to Candition3 of Approval, through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuancxl• of a Negative Declaration. Rte tfu_l lQy submi' red, Brad Buller City Planner BB:BC :ko Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map (Approved) Exhibit "C" - Site Utilization Map (Amended) Exhibit "D" - Area Development Plan (Approved) Exhibit "E" - Area Development Plan (Amended) Exhibit "F" - Tentative Tract Map ( 1pproved) Exhibit "'G" - Tentative Tract Map (;Amended) Exhibit "H" - Site Plan (Apprc-ied) Exhibit "I" - Site Plan (Amended) Exhibit "J" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "K" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "L" - Building Elevations Initial Study, Part II Resolution No. 85 -16 , Resolution of Approval with Conditions Y Y 111 w TH PA YXZZA April 25, 1986 Mr, Bruce Cook Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: TENTATIVE TRACTS 12802 and 12802 -6 Dear Bruce: In answer to your inquiry, the above - referenced tracts have been redesigned with a different lot size and dwelling type, because the 6000 Series homes originally planned for this location : have not found good acceptance in the marketplace. We are, therefore, discontinuing that line of homes. They will bt~ replaced in this location with our new Oxford Series, which is being very well received. We are also designing a new line of homes, known as the Park Series, the first p))ases of which will appear in projects- that we are now readying for City processing. I hope this answers your question as to why we have redesigned these tracts. Please call if we can be of any further assistance. Cordially, If r Kay Matlock Project Manager KM:kr:505t I? 1156 N. Mountain Aao- P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 (714) S85 -0971 p -4/ Developed by Lew"I Homes :J INK FIGURE It-17 Land Use Plan no 0 Tetra Vista SI N LM urw:wwr.rcdn w•a M rx•rox.vn wn MH .eou. �rx•w.a. H �.o.xx.vnnn�ww+al CC cwu•n +coawx C aa.wu NC •mmsaeaa..acvi HC wa�axausmrew OP arocru. MIX MO xru1ou.nxrwwnceo<w.w, wv: ��'o.nawe.d a+xa.•ww.cawrvc P B 1 A h .kH E nnaxur(oce4.� ®. P NO a rtr ' o ,500 10001500 L Scale in teal ��/ Itl -23 ' i NORTH CITY OF ITEM RANCHO CUCAlViO�TGA TITLE= t ,*--,V t p" o t t-bv 1 PLANNING DIVISIQN EXHIBIT- -- -N _._ SC,-,Lc,: I f SITE UTILIZATION AND NATURAL FEATURES MAP TENTATIVE., TRACT N.O. 12502 Am IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA �i i :ia�nw:° ::•am :°ui:..we.....,,r� ..vrno.., n..:.:. � wn.. • car. or ...cw ncux... r:.`�m::i i�.LOOU� °ev w u.u.ro,n�w,,,�er: •wue o: rcuiioiiu• n. u.ncs or NOVEMBER. 2984 '41.S ACRES ' 72 LOTS OF 6000 S.F. 149 LOTS OF 4000 S.F.. 9 Z NORTH CITY OF ITEM I: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE -s PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT=_ S(-'tkLE---' AMENDED SITE UTILIZATION AND NATURAL FEATURES MAP TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12802 IN THE CITY OF R4NCH0 U...ONO. COUNTY OF !AN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA MARCH l9iC • li.i. ACHEB 103 LOTS OF 0.000 B.F. 4 O El aa .t • v_s ial 10 0 z > 0 b-4 . . ... ..... .. . . ......... to co tlo 7 r -77 l CORMOO GR. NW R —TOIC Z8 Zvi :--i u 0— 0 4z,�P I T Z EM -tD ER 7 ig k s k i 10 N_RTH A4*irl 7 CITY OF RANCHO CLTCAMONGA PUU\MNG DIVISM ExHiBrr--]Z—scAu. nn > �a a i NT- 111 _ NORTH CrrY OF rf LM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tn7 PLANNM DIVIST EXHIBIT _, .� SCALE- E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION 1TSVI- TITI,$- <'r •G _trt EXHI `IT- :�-5 - SCALE- P -t NOY TH I Dim Lj if --f �- r,� I NORTH CITY CF R A IVIO TITLE: PL.A - NIM, DTV EXHIBIT. M =t3 --0 SCALES- N y e sit: z PIN < P'µ W $ VIEW I Dim Lj if --f �- r,� I NORTH CITY CF R A IVIO TITLE: PL.A - NIM, DTV EXHIBIT. M =t3 --0 SCALES- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PI.ANKING DIVISION FUTURE P/Wf ITEM: IT I Z 529 TILE: i r. tZr in -. OMV A N EXHIBIT; FORTH ssi i { _may DETAILED SITE PLAN TENTATIVE XQ"M►L. IV*. .:.L ACRLf TRACT Ti LOT. 0...000..►. NQ..'Z8�`./►Q Z itf t0T1 of .000 N.V. IN THE ciry 0►IAMCN0 CUCAMO.QA ' ! COOMTY O► SAM stKnAmDI00. ` tTATL of CAurosu A 4 \ �C• +�e.w. wwr�wYrr .... �.ur� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PI.ANKING DIVISION FUTURE P/Wf ITEM: IT I Z 529 TILE: i r. tZr in -. OMV A N EXHIBIT; FORTH ssi lag v a ZO 10, 00 W 0 Ifli z ul con.!n CITY CF RAINCHO CLCAMaNGA PLANNING E&EM w �I L -a �L shy INURTH TULEV'Sw--b EXHIBM T'�-SCALE-_,. um IE C4 Ul cc I � Tll ri z P ;Pr ""r cc WO 99 Ia. 4, & it , Al CITY CF, RANCHO CUCAMONTC.A. PLAILMM P-/'!�, 42, SCALE--_ s. IL US O tu Z OR . i - A 0 A 0 LLOO. OU CrrY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA nAINNING DIVLqC)j-,j E2 EA r� NORTH SCALE: p- i� g GHT SIDE ELEVATION 1 1 s I LEFT�BIDE ELEVR'L�zm -- w mwp .w. 1 s !_ 'HATAS1 I •w.w , aoartra r�r� f+sw• C U' _ILi _ as a.i•. ��.. v "�'TM ` PEAR ELEVATION '" PARTIAL�OOppL�N �I �r rsu ILA 7. ' pp r NORTH CITY ITEM RANCHO CUCAMOONGA rrLE, T PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: e'? saw JJ IUTMLR ' rtrae 1Wr•rwrtweanw •emrwaecemsowws.nwa 1/tTi �`.f�00R PLAN ".- NORTH CITY ITEM RANCHO CUCAMOONGA rrLE, T PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: e'? t L l M- ILL v It M - 111, AIOHT Sit)E�I fiVAT10N - J_,. .w.w.w _ ,..5,,.:�i.r- ( AEAR ELEVATION ��^n` y i _ Lr a0a131,0;�- it '6EET 910E ELEVATION ;��� \ � „��, _ FRQ�{,v >naN• 'ifr• iiN V `^�µ ^ �•,1•t' iWl t.naMt�Me[t_neb- I• +ri.{ ROOF P•�jj •amrrwae�msmrRwnaw Opli AL :FC OA PLAN OPTH CITY Q' fI EI�I. RANCHO TGHO CLTC ANIC)NGA Ttr t I a PU,.NNTNG i3[ MN xf itBri'= w SCAU. L ELEVATION 4- WA= so"s eWw mrwo+san - ♦ NORUi CIn'" CF RANCT Dl CUCAMONGA PL NNM DMITUN 6--SCALE.-- W .SIDE ELEVATION .ROOF PLAN - a7s. f I 'epo- 1�2z VA r41! nlu�tiwtlniil�.u� I KIA MY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IF gtQOR PLAN % Nom Tom: .4s! � R � 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DRIISM LA NORT C♦. 1TENI.- T}TI-E'-ill EXHIBIT: SCALE. V! • LEFT SIDE ELEVATION I k CITY OF RANTCM CUCAMONGA PLANNING DpvlSM -, XFLV'i kM= %EVATlQ MAW= •oomm SUZM-Ur.Wf LAM TLXTUIM CITY OF RANTCM CUCAMONGA PLANNING DpvlSM -, XFLV'i kM= %EVATlQ !`n ii D FLOOR PLO ,rrru. FXHIMT. SCAM I E MI-005;7- 15 A ■ All, ' PAR14Al SECOND FLOOR PLAN CTITY RANC CF HO CUCAMONGA PLANNM DIVLqaN EXHiw, 1 SCATLE -------- ib MI-005;7- 15 A ■ All, ' PAR14Al SECOND FLOOR PLAN CTITY RANC CF HO CUCAMONGA PLANNM DIVLqaN EXHiw, 1 SCATLE -------- L s ..LEFT 31DE ELEVATIA�„Nii � toaw� r�r a r_yrr r,r,w.p IaOM� rc.o $YOB 00.. 12.0 Tm. ra.t vum ,ry. -!u+9 +�Mw+t uca a.LBKr Tu- - .,.i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY EWIRON MNTAL CHECKLIST Aft WA DATE: r" 1.4 (6; , ^r,i APPLICANT: iG �bMSzS FILING DATE: PROJECT • ��i.1T —x I fe N /te iP �iBeF:.2:c:�_S '��' 016�` e t�L-� PROJECTLOCATION LeTs :+ _ Ylt � I. EAIVZRO \MENTAL. IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and GeoloR . Will the proposal have significant results in: a. UP_stable ground conditions or 3r, changes in geologic relationships? r: Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? Y c. .Change in tapography or ground surface contour into- .vals? d. The destruction, covering or modification Of any unique geologic or physical features? e- Any Potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or of_ site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? i;. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or•similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? -- 2 HydcEloc_v, Will the proposal have ai:,nificant results in: 0 Page YES MAYBE NO a. Changes in curuents, or the course of direction Of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? _ Z c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Lischarge into surface eaters, or any alteration of surface water quality, f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Q- uality? Quantity? ._ 4 h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flo -oding or seiches? 3. Air Qom. Will the proposal have siZnificant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? �s b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alterablon of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or 'number Of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any uriqu,,, rare or endangered species of plants,?,, __` Page 3 YES `L�"YBE SO c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of T— animals into an area, or, result in a br r to the migration or movement of anima' d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri - bution, density, diversity, ar growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6- Socio- Economic Factors, Will the proposal have significart results a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including econom_.: or commercial diversity, tax rate, and values? property i b. Will project costs be equitably dlsLrituted among project beneficiaries, i.�.., bugars, tax payers or project users? 7. Laud Use and Plannine Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an b. A conflict with any designations,, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental a entities? c< An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of ;q existing consumptive or non - consumptive � �� ! recreational Gpportunities? '`'j � Tr ?_19a 4 YES NO 8. Transportation. Will, the proposal have si�nificant results in.-- a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets. or demand for new street construction? C. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? 4Z e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people andfor goods? Alterations to Or effects on present and potential water-horne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? 9. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pe6estrians? 9, Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A i-'isturbance to the integrity of archaeological, pa leontological, and/or historical resources? 10. Health, Safetv and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have signific ts in: a. Creation of any health hazard or pot ential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to Potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances In the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to Potentially dangerous noise levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase ir light or glare? ;0I i Page S YES XkYbL NO Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a- Tire obstruction or degradation of vista �r view? ant scenic b. The cr ;tion of an aesthetically offensive site? C. A conflict with the objective of designated nated or potential scenic corn -dors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? c- Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? t f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fir e rotect � P 30 n. -- i- Police protection? J. Schools? fi. Parks or other recreational facilities? e 1- Maintenance of public facilities, includ .g roads and flood control facilities? M. Other governmental services? 13. Enerev and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have s ignificant resuits in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand -� upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? --- e s d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy .� gY are available? - � Page 6 YES Lc-%y SE ;10 ` e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. 'Mandatory r .,.ndin s of Si aificance. _ s a:' Does th +' project have the l potep ial to degrade the quality of the enviroiaen� s±Jstantia.11y reduce the habitat of fish _or vil3life species, cause a fish or wfldlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, seduce the number or restrict the range of . a rare or endangered plant or animal or +: liminate > impt;rtant examples of the major periods of Calirornia history or prehistory? s b. Does the project Gave the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of- long - term, environmental goals? % short -term impact.:on the environment is one which occurs; in a relatively brief, definit j *-- period of time while long- term impac ,4s rv_ _ endure well into the future) . c. Does the 1lroject have h impacts which ich are Individually limited, >, but cumulatively considerable; (Cr�,aulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). - d. Does the project have environmental effects Uhich will cause substantial adverse effects ou human beings, either directly or indirectly? ` > _ II. DISCUggIO,y OF ENFIR0%ZM yTk, EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative the above questions discussion answers to plus a of proposed mitigation measures). r y Page 7 III. DETE?y!ISATIMI �5 On the basis of this initial evaluation: j� i /X41 I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a signifi'ant effect on the environment, :.nd a SEGATIVz- D£CL.�ITIOY will be prepared. I find'`that although the proposed p' ?toject could have a significant effecr" on the environment, effect there cz3�1 not be a significant in tb'Ls case.�ecause the mitigation measures described on anf attached sheet'have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. (--1 I find the proposed project 'LAY have a slgnifics envir nc effect on the ament, and an Eh�IIRbtfl yT DJPACT REPORT is requi'`d. Date m L9 S b azure ¢¢ Title Y 7 s e KI RESOLUTION NO, 85 -16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE `,ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, C- 2NDITIONALLY APPPOVING TENTATIV't TRACT MAP N0. 12802 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12802 hereinafter "Map" submitted by ! -ewis Homes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 221 single family detached units on 41.5 acres of land within the Terra Vista Planned Community designated tow - Medium and Medium, located on the south side of Mountain View Drive, east side of Spruce Avenue - APN 1077 -091- 02,03 and 1077 - 421 -03, 04 into 224 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on February 13, 1985; and WHEREAS, the City. °.Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's izports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12802 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specif #c plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at larger p, now of record, for access through or use of ' e property within the proposed subdivision. „41L _-~ Tentative Tract 1280: Page 7#2 /~ � (q) That this project wi] not create adverse impacts on the - environment aad a Negative Declaration is '"""""` SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Nap M»^ 12802° a copy ur Nhich is attached /" n subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division z. Each lot within slope or less) rear yard area from building to pi,perty line or slope/retaining wall of fifteen (15) feet*. A final detailed, "-,ite plan which indicates slope and retaining wall '_cations a,-id unit plotting shall be """m/cceo prior to issuance of building permits. u. Each lot within the project shall be provided ^d h front yard irrigation and landscaping including street trees and seeded lawn. Details shall be provided an the landsc-ae and irrigation plans submitted to the Planning Divi, for review and approval pv-�- to issuance of buildi,,j 3. Corner side yard fencing and retaining --11s shall be set back a minimum distance - of �� from the back of sidewalks. All 'interior street facing- retaining walls shall be constructed of decorative block. 4' Street facing side elevations all corner lots and the rear of two-story units facilig Spruce Avenue, and Mountiin View Drive shall be upgraded with additional wood trim, wood siding, or plant-ons where appropriate. Construction details shall be indicated on the working drawings (including specific lot numbers). -^ Low level ./y"^.ny unu// be provided along the interior Greenway .." sections. Construction details shall be provided on the improvement plans prior to issuance of building permits. , 6. Construction details of ' the retaining l wall treatment submitted for review along �W Terra Vista Parkway ~^~'' be ' ew to the Division prior to of -foe fi --'= �m ~ recordation __ of the Tract Map, . block on the perimeter wall shall be reviewed and 'vaa by the City . 7. Lot "C. (in between Lots 121 and 122) in the east side Spruce Avenue shall be landscaped per 0ty Standards and % pedestrian walkway provided. Park redit for lot "C" shall not be granted. -J , !'l Tentative Tract 128c4. Page ;�3 t 8. Greenway trail improvements are required along the south boundary of this project from Spruce Avenue to Lot -'B ". Said improvements from Street ' -F" easterly to Lot "S" may be temporary in nature. 9. Final ::,!sign and construction details of the greenway trails including landscaping, irrigation, walls and fencing shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Engineering Division 1. The applicant shall construct the following off -site access roadways, with a minimum of 26 foot wide A C pavement within 40 feet of dedicated right-of-way- a. Spruce Avenue from Base Line to the site. b. Church Street and Elm Avenue from Haven Avenue to the site including a bridge across Deer Creek Channel. The cost of the bridge shall be credited towards the systems development fee for the Terra Vista Development. 2. The following pertains to the drainage from the southerly cul -de -sac streets: a. A drainage study is required to document that increased flows are not being directed to the south. b. An easement or acceptance letter is required from the l property owner to the south. c. A velocity reduction devise shall be installed at the outlet of the draif ' to reduce erosions do +stream.. Maintenance of facility shall be the responsibility of the ?veloper. 3. All' gre -,.3y trails shall be dedicated on the Final Tract Map, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1985. COMMISSION 9 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8Y: d� Denni to ATTEST: R ck Tentative Tract 128Wt f Page A4 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary- of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the r- City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of February,: 1985, by the folluwing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSJONERS:7 BARKER p I 31 Mg, IS 7F - I: P .U� om -loi�Z-Half-1. :o: Z, ux H. - 2. Hon is 2. z 79 Ali o ---zi —o' zni 2. uz: 2'. =-E t R. - 7 v. F Z c; t �Xz Z-;.5 T -.r sp OR ;12 21 -S'! Z, Z 1 A N -1 211 12; S. Zd- -.s RV :.5 { ! G b na .00q Ps w V .rnga, �' u� L So G a vti^ O" ° ^yOYtp 2. w� ^FO aCc�'�a o g AN V .+ y�� r .,., ` N � � L Y 41 U ! O = •E,,,c u^ Y l o >La'O d� covq v .°N fir,. ^a C. 2.9 G ,° w 6 C a G Y G` N •' 'O C uV ^° Ip C =407 O N ra G O C. ww Ga^ oiw crY ErN .� NONYL�v..9aym N o.�u T� % ^•� cam.' �m�ssa u b ^I HI ^ y�s nL Pia.. La u `rvw °a c'c wa rnw i .. y Y E r`•s .°co a. °.V.a Y^ U y b U0 .,,ir Rau acu d` uo.� oru° a.`q .w YUq u N y N FEC 9CC.NU ly•°- G N Lu ��'.� yoN _ � V^ 4 >5 Y v Y C Y 5i C�cVl=-V L GyN 3 U Yt ��LaY^ ii- C U "'. u7 9Y Gb4a w CC d 9 y0. Ob U Y« at V« ^ .._- u .� b . ° V° n _ ° M'aClLr ..n . Sq v O Yw ^ p yuy Ns Y.0 ^p Y'GY r =� • 6O1jd o E-E Ka �d GN ubYL ar..ti a N G4 O.VN ^O VOA Ls YOI d� O a j O q p ^ ^fina•;M nd�N Gp 6C jv dq� VG ^ au .. tp,,. vON na .00q Ps r� w"a .rnga, O Y C d w 9 y U O.i G Cc SL °«N. G 2. w� ^FO aCc�'�a o g AN V .+ y�� r .,., ` N � y�s nL Pia.. La u `rvw °a c'c wa rnw i .. y Y E r`•s .°co a. °.V.a Y^ U y b U0 .,,ir Rau acu d` uo.� oru° a.`q .w YUq u N y N FEC 9CC.NU ly•°- G N Lu ��'.� yoN _ � V^ 4 >5 Y v Y C Y 5i C�cVl=-V L GyN 3 U Yt ��LaY^ ii- C U "'. u7 9Y Gb4a w CC d 9 y0. Ob U Y« at V« ^ .._- u .� b . ° V° n _ ° M'aClLr ..n . Sq v O Yw ^ p yuy Ns Y.0 ^p Y'GY r =� • 6O1jd o E-E Ka �d GN ubYL ar..ti a N G4 O.VN ^O VOA Ls YOI d� O a j O q p ^ ^fina•;M nd�N Gp 6C jv dq� VG ^ au .. tp,,. vON C; .�-•i P -qo 21$°c� E u a E V y � C NEV qs L R CN� V L � n out° 'ET . o '"moo ud � R 3 p L o °rya wN W i�0 b is n cy �Yeg 9 E 11 �.°L. C dw %CL °l�.j � 3w°• E'er.. Cc SL °«N. G v6 _1= a U� ^qE O'ybjb °� w� ^FO aCc�'�a o g AN V .+ y�� r .,., ` N � � NUN•.. bud u° '� Noaa uccNL op °` G 2.9 G ,° w 6 C a Js. 'O C uV ^° Ip C =407 Llcc' =- ww Ga^ oiw crY N�� wd N o.�u T� % ^•� cam.' �m�ssa u 41ww „Y„ aD 'Y un Tu ��v ov.°ew .r.,E.. YUUaY N .°.EG C; .�-•i P -qo 21$°c� E u a E V y � C NEV qs L R CN� V L � n out° 'ET . o '"moo ud � R 3 p L o °rya wN W i�0 b is n cy �Yeg 9 E 11 9V C ut • .. V ^rp pl ° Ocbt� C C L A M u L L y NAl� yW w,cv LO ^.«VC G4 `Y 7Z yr. OR. + OrnAtJw °.i lCV n^ �y d pig .°. �j» ((•V i Ui Lrr. L,N� �G.L °•r+Vy ep\ � '��=J eNy.� QL w A tp,G C�•� � J uP�O�ac E piV •., 9va� nYq 4j{ ° p` u c .:' ra .n •` � m $tea -t �•q �6 aa� `C^9 NM Iq q yPp� � � A Q'V wq0. u p u^gy A. budC a Q � L u •-. A v O °VC Vq 01Y O +C jN�4 a.w v NC• `r ^ n w Eayi .,^.N �^_O rL-�O { Yuri�w'o _V �� N d�C� • VVt1.W Q�pq 5 �-°. UVC`nNN ° >.°..rd O9 NZ CL�� �Cw G� y W q � Y r faw�aee x N_qr " °a^ =r.L. v' °N Y arc o u C_Ca.rw v� A o== v ° W. Sao n modNW tw o v ff�u rc T ZH 9V C ut .Yp r .. V ^rp pl ° Ocbt� C C L A M u w= wq yW w,cv LO ^.«VC G4 `Y 7Z yr. OR. + A F c r 9 N Z L Y wW.0 qN n^ �y d pig S' C�Lt � °`V y + O•r o` va •w �Y C° '• y..r°. r L w '�� uuAq 4t LTA N v r G4 OVA r pL^ r tON tz �N �i O Y.y� -..• N Tf f N i O UL_ V4r y�� N c c a 6 + tY. V..Cp U NW p_o:.�� n:q� rq a. E+>+ WvCpCp O L. Gp6 A A p +w �yr4 as w L A d 9w. iL �ME�•Gi N`.w V r tM01 W4Y0DS 44 W W 4 Nr w R H N pt N O Y�LO. of �} nWLM CEO cv �i u9 r Y '•`00 �Y qa yV. pp�V y a OW Epp C w a F Nwr q� ~i tV v rV t -lire N UH r^ p l O w u •. s rs o Ou 4L Y u a YN T w Cpl a ra P O L} NC Lt.° ng YO=q M.Y^ wy Yf00� �Yq wr' ^ L pL O w ° Y Ftt L L Nr E.• N.o hw .. +. <wr• 7c Wt :I INI b' cn a PJ mqa a^�da Q ry 04 q 9 y N an t LGti ° Y �a9� - ^Ed ^moo �E =yc •. aci° > v urpiG � 3 � d QG ^01 jq- ° y Od dud aFaC =U Er �� 6R d0 � _ W RN -C_ C •a Hd eLiU '_ 6 L [I i • ` tt`C au qyE Uq u 6. f1 c4u•aCO y.0 6'la� _� u L u 4� pNo� �qU jN pETZ- Sl mw �� CE d do�C C 06 •` O vO po j qC 9 S N C V q"O O w.0 in NEFU _ �VS.Cd 6Y SC �� WfrO LV � � y� Y O O p O u y w u V. ♦ >`NU' N y C.a' Y auE. ... OIL M �.6 OON CO n -c!•C to y E q c a s rYWl 6 to 6.^Rw.O V[ Hl -2 a ^ u NC _ s ^. YO — WNE � / I IN •i 1 q aq u`6 1 Ey y p n: µd u Cc C FL UC^ 9 OCgEE c k V2u.^ -. I -st 3k _q X_an a paw Y°r ��y.'• UC° d U�o a�GY.N .CIVENi . E y OCN a.a 2:5 G•�: c£ �=up' NV G.uir E C.Va - o . -op .L.r ♦O NC M `L and N G q YG u ^YOL uCS S W CC' C >• p.FG� - � Z'S d NM L� MO q^ ^ pt. - r r a 2G WC ^••. ,trd� �Leai S".d CEdi A. .4'. r.Q�� - t� h EO Vp uL G.dn- Ma- CV�GT I-Vim" i "L Tc9 auu -E ^ u uu.-8 vzT E! v •a °^ O a 46m s 2 LQ i� w C d cM OY WY. WBS v Ty dq�a •w [' " °] O. OR ap qE 6+°r 9 Q tip FL 0. ,dydY 6u 6 I l u - -qp 3LiLNQ i • NI [7� O!� u J L = 3 V b N a u n, o O1 m by m c 4.3 ♦ ]�S! r� 4 �' U o � v L Y a a a^ qr O 7 O N S u E v n d3° b Ysn p O q T n L C O I n0 K -= C • C � L E �y iii °� x - e CnY 2 o• N Yryj i^ ¢q e i T D qOE yt O u aN T9s yiu u L9N O1 m by m c u 7; va O U o � VE Y N G _ U n Y x 0 p u E v n d3° b Ysn p �.°. n L C O T.� ^� n0 K -= C el sn = y I CnY �t i' E Su e i T D qOE yt O a v E U C V ° T. v ae °•v N L= SL �. OT f v -V. y E.q a- �. u +• «i L G Q L W �C f' .. u �' ^q r e� �� • u C •L,iO •r o x e p v+E •t. u n n c.TPO M E CVO e.E ap�v O1 m by m c Y n,n o Y i'•r o � �$ � e°E•. YvoE 9.LO'a «T a +' is pry -n q•^ � � q q <s sn = y � PuT q ' S 660 Uq y �a°i i T D qOE yt O va .. • V E C V Aj OV • C• l La o .°c e °-am C�� > °r � -V. y E.q a- �. u +• «i L x ° E ou . _ Yy U« Win' 4NU SN C �C f' .. u �' ^q r e� �� • u C •L,iO •r o x e p v+E uc• I' °v x 6 L. ° .°o a °ter E'er " o 'r^ f Y q6 T °P 9 a —u LL '�6nm c �j ° «eY �9� a. c' g4iC �Ly Vy� • Zip 6q L^ r t P' p p P ?k V N � C Y N. 4 i n u M u D= NV'ONr G N to A. 4 g q 0 O6 V t l: 1LmaV QOY'YO C•q. A uq G q w i * na a W ' o T E E c 2° d r � iM G a c' z a ti E� mY t 4 tiW a 'o ?s W~ U N ^ � r � K o ¢ �W�y b`WC ° ^ yr ^•�� r S �.t 3 y O b Ga m W uo W d ^t u L d-f L aMO �Ttins n �" a n u.��i wy' 0 Nv T E Ejt C d u coe F 4 �qCl yy C ,n O C V �u TN Y ' Ra S - d 2`pq �G Wit° Oq O L ll C1 > Z na LwL d L qyL ..r q vZL q�NC' Y �ntiu il aOA �gN8 4i 4p 9 pL� 67 C Ci d .,E-N it =r,W `C Nd Ygru Cj ^^ Y 2 .t�` cl .:: ,= L V V. EA CV W 3r�i, C� N 1 t°.CO GL9 dO °L -. s <U drC. WaLiML •� o ° o py C iu 26 uv �q v .-r , d Fes: ¢n,n npaL ;I �z k Ow dy V @ �y d y N`pw. »r•° -'Q n q w � v°io�..ta T E E c 2° d r � iM G a c' z a ti E� mY t 4 tiW a 'o ?s W~ U N ^ � r � K o ¢ O �.t 3 Ga m W uo W d ^t u L E 0 L b a° M t r c e � 1 Ll mY t ?s t L O ^t u L L aMO �Ttins n �" a n u.��i wy' 0 Nv T E Ejt d u ml > Z na ymd nw cEu l q�NC' Y �ntiu il LpN c�au^ b OIGN Gc 67 d a cl 4Ot L Ow dy V @ LSw a nu y N`pw. »r•° -'Q n q w � v°io�..ta my e � 1 Ll ° W �a Y `p 4J U N ro <`°. a c Cl. -- t u � ro�`o n cY � t I o}1C9 Yy n a4sz! C .2 u� urn a LEYE.y G _ �� A w V O 0 4 a d V t y Y 6ro N C d. Ta a tT ^ ro c a a Y `= M j S2 a p E CL N•� L N uG ` C 5 �� ZZ d d . A a c Yy a rd y d rood O ~ E ^. Oil ct,• q c � ° W ` y NcLV •.. �s N EL `� �c� aw Oda Nv �W � piy°j °y cT—`• NE deeei trod 4 W d •C k .., _.. Ts^ t...• �. 4v dN> t`a u > d J d.= roY py W v < 4 tV'f is RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12802 (REVISED) WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12802 (Revised), hereinafter "Map" submitted by Lewis Homes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 16.6 acres in the Low Medium Residential District (4 -8 du /ac) within the Terra Vista planned Community, located on the south side of Mountain View Drive, east of Spruce Avenue (APN: 1077- 091 -03) into 103 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on May 14, 1986; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set .,orth in the Engineering and Planning Division's. reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to eni a ive Tract No. 12802 (Revised) and the Map thereof: 1p i (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Dcveloument Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, t and spec;f:c plans; I (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; ie) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The ',.sign of the tentative tract will not conflict with my easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. '. ti K] PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION TT 12802 - LEWIS HOMES May 14, 1986 Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12802 (Revised), a ropy of which is attacge-ff--rierto, is hereby approved subject to ail of the following conditions: 1. All conditions of Resolution No. 85 -16 and its attached Standard Conditions shall remain applicable. 2. Side -entry garages shall be provided for units on Lots 37, 73, 85, 90, and 102 to maximize efficiency of ingress /egress to/from lots. 3. Lot lines shall be readjusted, where feasible, to maximize streetside sideyards for corner lots. A revised tract map and detailed site plan showing the re- plotting of lots shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to recordation of the final map. 4. In plotting units on corner lots, those floor plans whose design is best suited to the configuration of the lot and strikes the best balance between maximizing streetside sideyards and minimizing view impacts to the street and to neighboring lots shall be used. 5. Some elements of the architectural design included within the front elevation shall be continued on the other three sides of the house exterior to provide an enhanced architectural profile to ali four sides of the dwelli,:g unit. Revised elevations detailing these added elements shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ennis L. Stout, airman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Ueputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: k.� viii VL' LYLll \VLiV V V Vt11I1VlVlSti L'CAA STAFF REPORT 0 U DATE; May 14, 1986 IF/7 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, Assistant Planner SUB,'�CT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12835 REVI ED r 0 ERSE REALTY ENTER RI E - A multi- family residential evelopment compri_ng of 132 condominium -,nits on 9.52 acres of land in` t7e Medium Residential Ol,trict (8 -14 du /ac), located e:;t of Vineyard, 600± north of Arrow Highway - APN 208-'631-05. In addition, applicant has requested a Tree Removal Permit to remove . the northerly windrow. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 13.87 du /ac C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning. North - txisting multi-family development (Woodsong Village, Tentative Tract 12721); Vedium Residential District South - Approved- multi- family development (Villa Mirage, Tentative Tract 13131;; Medium Residential district East - Bear Gulch Elementary School; Medium Residential District West - New townhomes (Tentative Tract 12386); Medium Residential District D. General Plan DesiGnations: Project Site - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac), Mater Plan Overlay District North - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) South - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) East - Bear Gulch Elementary School; Medium Residential (4-14 du /ac;, West - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) E. Site Characteristics: The project site is vacant and slopes to the south at grade. There are no significant scenic, cultural, or historical values associated with this site. Present vegetation consists of a declining Eucalyptus windrow along the north- ,property line, a few mature trees along east ITEM Q PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 12835 (REVISED) - OVERSEAS REALTY ENTERPRISES May 14, 1986 Page 2 property line and an Avocado tree in the center of L:;e site. The applicant intends to remove the existing Eucalyptus grove along the north boundas;Ir and preserve scattered trees at the east property line. In this pre,rious approval for tentative Tract 12835, a letter from the consulting horticulturist indicated the existing Eucalyptus windrow along the north property line was in a serious state of decline and recommended removal (see attached letter). II. BACKGOUND: On February 27, 1985, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved the development proposal for 116 townhomes on the above referenced site under Tentative Tract 12835 (see Exhibit % "). The applicant has decided to change the produ :t type from 116 townhomes to 132 condominium units and has re- ,,,ubmitted an entirely new development proposal for your review. 'II ANALYSIS A. General:Tho, applicant is proposing to construct 12 condominium units in a typical 2 -story stacked flat magnar. The 16 buildings are arranged around three (3) parking courts along an internal loop road system. This creates a central open space with sidewalk connected to dwelling units. Active recreational features include a tennis ,court and kiosk, swimming pool /spa, and a tot -lot area. The project has a contemporary style of architecture consisting of concrete mission tile roofing, exterior stucco plaster, exposed wad trusses with wood fascia and hand rails (see Exhibit "G "). The proposed unit sizes vary from 802 square feet to 920 square feet.. The following data is a project breakdown: BLDG. NO. OF APTS/ APT. SQUARE TYPE BUILDINGS BLDG. TYPE FOOTPE TOTAL A 7 8 2 bed /2 bath 920 ` `66 B 5 8 2 bed /2 bath 844 '. C 3 8 2 bed /1 bath 802 D 1 12 2 bed /1 bath 802 12 Total 132 units The applicant has provided for 271 par. ing stalls with the main access to the project site taken from Vineyard Avenue, an additional emergency access is located at the northeast corner of the site. Also, two (2) pedestrian ronnection from Bear Gulch Elementary School to the east are indicated on the precise site plan (see Exhibit "D "). i l El PLANNING IMISSION STAFF REPORT TT ,2835 (..aISED) - OVERSEAS REALTY ENTERPRISES M�.,; 14, 1986 Page 3 B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee has reviewed an• determine that t the site design, elevations, and open space areas comply with the applicable ,: rovisions of the Development Code. The Committee recommends approval subject to the following revisions to which the developer has - grrzed to provide, 1. The overall design ; ,for the recreational building should emulate domilhant architectural elements of the main buildings and allow for applications of solar panels. 2. Side elevations for Buildings "A ", "B ", and "C" should be enhanced through more archi'tec`;ral detailing (i.e., wood or stucco band, louver vents, and vertical stucco detailing). 3. Provide a greater number of landscape finger planters throughout parking areas, in order to break up large paving surfaces and provide more shede. ® C. Technical Review Committees Presently, overhead utilities exist along the frontage of the project site on Vineyard Avenue. 66 K.V. lines are on the top of the existing poles as well as other electrical and telecommunication lines, — The Committee recommends that telecommunication and electrical lines less than 66 K.V. be underground at the time of bviTding construction` However, it should also be noted that t:ae propos %d project is the last development along this stretch of Vineyard Avenue to be developed. All other projects were conditioned prior to the new policy and utility lines were not conditioned to be placed underground., D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and has determined that the development of ' the subject site would expose people and property to water - related hazards, such as flc3ding. However, this h-.s been mitigated through securing and recording a drainage easement along the east property line to allow the construction of store' drain facilities, according the to City's Master Plan Drainage System. In addition, the subject site will expose people to high levals of noise. A preliminary noise study identified appropriate mitigation measures to reduce present exterior noise levels of 70db (CNEL) to less than 65db (CNEL). The results show a seven (7) foot high wall or berm or wall /berm combination along Vineyard would be needed to reduce the noise impact to less than 65db (CNEL). Other options include having no buildings inside the 70db (CNEL) contour using several of the closest buildings along Vineyard as accoustical shields for recreational areas to the east (see Exhibit "D"). The architect incoporated bth techniques 'in 16 j PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 12835 (REVISED) - OVERSEAS REALTY ENTERPRISES May 14, 1985 Page 4 E/ the site design. Hnwet'er, 3vaff recommends provisions for a 7' high decorative masrnary block wall /berm and dense landscaping conjunction with the above mitigation measures. Interior noise levels will be reduced to the City's criterli of 45db (CNEL) by the use of special windows and entry doors on buildings Icing Vineyard that are within the 70 -E5db (CNEL) cont,pur. The final noise study still identify additirmal construction techninues and huiid'ng materials to further reduce interior noise levels to 45db (CNEL) or less. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The site plan and elevations, together with recommended CRH ici are in compliance with4 the applicable provisions of the Development Code, Genral Plan, and City Standards. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or Gauss significant adverse environmental impacts due to storm drain facilities which will be provided to dispose of surface run -off and noise attenuation features` will be utilized to mitigate exterior and interior noise levels. V. CORRESPONDENCE: 11iis item has been advertised in The Datly Report newspaper as a public hearing. In addition, a large 4' x 8' notk? :ication sign was posted on the site and notices were sent to ali property* owners within 300 feet of the project site advertising the public hearing. To deter no correspondence has been received regarding this project. V. RECOMMEN.DATI0N: Staff recoviends that the Planning Comr,rission approve >_ntative Tract 12835 (revised) through the adoption of the attiched Resolution and Conditions and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted,: Bra Boiler City Planner BB :HF:;o Attachments: Letter from Horticulturist Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Master Plan Overlay Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Site Plan E=xhibit " "' Landscaping Plan Exhibit -- Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Elevations Exhibit "H" Floor Plans Exhibit "I" Carport Elevations Exhibit "J" - Misc. Details Exhibit "E." - Approved Site Plan Exhibit "L" — Approved Elevations Exhibit "M" - Tree Removal Pa,,mit Initial Study, Part II Resolution of Approval q, i Richard G. Moire Consulting Horticulturist 914•D Redding Way UOiand, G 9178& 714-981-1835 Mr. Vartan Minassian Overseas Realty Enterprises Inc. 300 So. Harbor Blvd. Suite 600 Anaheim, Ca. 92805 uo 13 'S Dear Mr. Minassian, At your request I evaluated the trees on the property near Arrow and Vineyard. The trees are a Eucalyptus variety that wa,: unt) extensively, as a wind break when, this araa was Planted to citrus. The latin name for this tree is EucalPttuss globulus, The trees on the north and south Perim' of the property are in a Serious state of decline. There is considerable die -back and it is my opinion that it would be adviseable to remove them. They will be a hazard t_ people and structures due to the Potential of breakage. They have been known to cause serioVS damlige due to falling branches. Even if prunned back thay would never be an asset to the Property. The same ho %de true for the two large trees on the east side. The 1p."ge old tree in the center of the property towards the Vineyard side is an Avocado. Growt ^a habit indicates it is the variety Fuerte. I st"ngly fee;, it is-not Korth saving either since it would be a rusence in a track due to its age, its suscpiibily to roo tot, breakage azzt fruit drop. I hope this answers your inquiry, If I can do ar*thing further for you please feel free to contact ate. BUILDING R8INQ ►t�l'DMIRG Glo. *H ILC71 IEL _ itcs=: Since'relym , 'Richard Q, Maire Consulting Horticulturist �.1 CITY OF R AN CHO CL'QWONLGA PLANNING WPSfDN Q—te U �A LI-A rl� IVORTE TrrU: .L ©eq�'rocT SAP EXHIBIT: — �29" SCALE--. u N pift, �40 I J RMO TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 12835 IN THR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONW. %qPAAWM. PLM OU, MAY LEGEND NQIMIVN QvtRuy IUSTRIC)p BOLMDARY IMINC)ARY OF ttkTAY]Vt TRACT No. IC83S GRAWAGE AREA AMMARr DRAMAGE AREA "UMIER MANAGE AREA ACREAGE anual4ri MuLow -0 wow. i Mom 4 320- M..M, NORTH CrrY OF RANCHO CLKAMONGA nTL.E.. PLTANNM DTVMN EXH113rr. --22LSCALE- Ric If t Flees cOi• I IT ..w.a.elr•w.,u -� �f— Slu... l—J 1 ' .:Y vK' A �:ttg vl•� 1 ., =f +o 111 I �37tI�1; jAt�1LY j l.' - `e'er t .., ^• ra•r. rt,�er s �rsi "" o 40 Ei0 ISO FAEPMEQ DECEMSE11 111965 CITY QN, l '� EXHf3i1'�_J� SCALE -_ — I .I I, r t%Q- Kamm oaT I.> [.' xecuasa D GOVRFtO P2F 'h ` Z OLGK:pM.+ DD • ilLe OTA...D. ilCeY 10o X ,7. 'r9 aTALLD _. �6T( OTALW FIbNOta NORTH RAKED, Ctr-�mojNGA PLANNM DM .. _�!:r]RIBM '`s • ,t1U mew l PG1rJd��`t� �MGvJ�a �G1�?1 `� LA.C• ARLA 4M AORDD D0D OLe4x . 001 WT* ,ON . a o-J ws 01.076 PALM O AFDA oFw DFevx w•eR a CI Do�.•.er CIO. foezl ovTA;.e.� wALir naeFFwea rw. bea ao+TM aueaa a.ya. Dore aoo � "4".t .• aww '=bob O 50LOO GOO Di:, V.1 D Aa TTwe N0. DLa[o AFTOIELOD AFT TTFL Tor u A 7 0 O Clali BATH bo D e b s e4as; eww ya 0 O D O yt D211 DA" / 11 a DLOII BAT9 D. H no u Mu` UT DD C' T,% AYT Tier Oa. TOOTAG9 MO. AFTD TOTAL 0 DLOF DATA 602 D}. DO 40.bTO o }• D ODO /S DATM 84. D}, .10 DDioO Jt, D DLaI1 DATM 970 J}. b0 D1b00 a }. P1*2 O}. r t%Q- Kamm oaT I.> [.' xecuasa D GOVRFtO P2F 'h ` Z OLGK:pM.+ DD • ilLe OTA...D. ilCeY 10o X ,7. 'r9 aTALLD _. �6T( OTALW FIbNOta NORTH RAKED, Ctr-�mojNGA PLANNM DM .. _�!:r]RIBM '`s • ,t1U mew l MRTHmik TMLEtAtOW _r S+c':A, F. w a�rr 1 A � C1aP pL _ 3. -- � t moo"` d° A s ,r r It �► b lam MRTHmik TMLEtAtOW _r S+c':A, F. w a�rr !\ .' � '`. . . � L | ^ 0 40 80 ISO um MY OF RAN CM CUCAMONGA SCALE- ''� � '`. . . � L | ^ 0 40 80 ISO um MY OF RAN CM CUCAMONGA SCALE- ,t�7 NOS RANCHO C CA,MONGA PI.&NNING DR%M, s EXHI LJ OIIILOINO FLOOR ALAN Grp .FRONT 6Lif V ATION RICH KLBIVAITION Li A.1 I .rrf rl 1i � ►i 1) slo CITY OF RANCHO GY.TCAM(YNGA Try; PL.R,NNiWj E tlIRO,N SCA L TWO ■OORO sm /ONY 92Ar,4 �od�oac� cmIr TCM 4 CLICA,t O �T17A -) Q, EXHB[Z'= _sh'' SCALE 12 H 12 �J I U � Lll�?L /LIt�J Q • _ . rIOR1T-i MY OF ITEM- 0 R-&NNM ( MS EXHIBtT:_OR, - . _. SCALE: �- '� Fm CITY OF RAM-D CUCAMONGA PPANM TME: DPRO Rt, EO) Ul('V, 7 I NORTH CITY OF RANCID cLicAMO-,\, GA TrrLE: PLANNING DIVI rlat EXHIBIT =_ FMQ% O,4. e. "aAM r4ow *HO Pi T6 OJl1CF►qMT GG UTi'AMKII TOT o OtPA ).9 PON a TAPPRWGV y0 ClPARiTgNT MOR' 11 fAcCIA -.'ALL =t* _NO= cfu T" cor tea. rQ�c _ —_- -- . w.rmp !'LOtlCr ADOVV h/ AORYWO LDNe i p ATTAGtt2 7STt1 •_ 7° *TL TWO CCX r wt w000 -rwM mr. 1 - TMOX. VV- zscrON MAWPACTI M k �y GIRD V U TYPIG� \!. CARPORT i r till M m 4L NORTH CITY OF RANCID cLicAMO-,\, GA TrrLE: PLANNING DIVI rlat EXHIBIT =_ �.�. :� •- it TURF Bl.oGK NOTRt TUV 0-041C To DG 6A10 OV91k 1` 0r aAhD OVRR oCW°ALT90 RAKTN TOp- smIeRR0Y40 ORThD9N QOWORRTR SURM Ol.06K0 c „' .nt s -Ls r a jt s 1L1- x .tix Y: - •�tiR aR � 44. M" I NORTH L Aim()iN A TIT[ E: ���►a: ._ t.A1VNu' _ EXHIBIT= SCALE: ` - u M611N +TTHTUI +YI+W In111 Y++TM uw cm +IN+InRy c .e.I.rasnn x Iu. Iw vTr sm Inu- r..ww wr 1SX LI NORTrI ` K ANN rX, Ir![ VZI€ NT EXHMrr . SCAT -- ------------------ 0701-02 o 5-14-86 P.C. Agenda Packet o Paqe7,ofl8 M A C CR REAR n Ci l .L O RA TCEO CUGWCNGA MRTH ITE1I: TTI I E Awl F,XHIBIT: ",I. fir" STALE: CR CR C - l3 REAR NORTH CITY OF ITE;�I: X��` RANCHO CLTCA,MONGA PLANNING R • I)R'ISUN EXHIBIT. 0. � FRONT .� � « � � \ 4 4 REAR v V NORTH C TY OF KAMM CLTC - M.CCTGA Tom, �' ��►����► � PLAi�i�itl'�G DIVL ExHr ►, •°SSCALE-- man, Wi4btgK) TCo 5"'UJCY 11-DICATU-5 41 :1. Nost4*4 Wip4bIL6 mAll FORTH CITY OF rMNA.- D --ZZ&/2gAZgr RANCHO CLU-jWaNGA E: Rrsm WM FXIJIMT. ',w SCALE: CITY OF MNCHO CUCAMOVGA PART I1: - INITIAL STLIIY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: 0;�A1, APPLICAtiT:��,+� s_�.tiG% ✓it�Tcetr� /crs a FILI:iG DATE: U/i: ZJ-. !f 3- ..LOG NUMBER: _%.''- i �r mac- VROJECT:� PROJECT LOCATION: I. EWIRO:"IE:IT ?_ .L IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). 1. Soils and GeoloRV. Dill the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions,. displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c. ,Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting er,ther on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or'similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? 2. Hydroloev. Will the proposal have signi:icaett results in: YES MAYBE NO 1 e v ' a: f I Page 2 Frs u{:•B= no k a. Changes in currents; or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream Channels? ' ` b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? �. C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood — waters? v d. Change in the amount of surface water in any _ body of eater? e, Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of ;roundwaters, either t;7rough direct additions or with- , drawals, of through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity':' f' h. The reduction in the amount of pater other- wise available for public water supplies? I- Exposure of people or prope:tv,t to water related hazards ruch flooding as cr �reiches? V/_ 3. Air Quality, Will the proposal ;rave significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissior;s from mobile or indirect sourcew^ Stations o Stationary sources. b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attairuaent of applicable air quality standards? lzl c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? -� 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change In-the characteristics of species, ' Including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the rru abers of airy unique, rare Ourendangered speciev of plants? Ir c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an urea? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural Production? Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant results in: a. Chanve in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the locatiGo, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results inc a. Change in local or regional socio +•economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and planning Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? a. An Impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? ?age 3 YS `UYBE NO IV �i • - - 0111 t% J E, Page w YES 8. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant ? ±aY3S NO results in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? r b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street, construction? s c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- K tion systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goads? f. Alterations to or effects on present and f. potential water - borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? l/ g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,f, r bicyclists or pedestrians? 4. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have ' significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? r/ 10. Health. Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? _ f b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ �f .._ c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? e f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels?/ g. The creation of objectionable odors? �. 1 h. An increase in light or glare? ?ase 5 , Yls L`LlBE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant I results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of 1p any scenic vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? ° v c. A conflict with the objective of designated ^ or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or aiterarions to the following: a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? C. Commun3 `dons systems? if d. Later s,.dply? j e. Wastew ^ter facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? I. Police protection? ° v J. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? �! 13. Eneret and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand fr development of new sources of energy? d. An : zrease or per of the consumption of ucn- renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? �/ k 'aze 6 f p YES MAY37. NO'. ' e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. Mandatory Findings of Sisnificance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, v cause a fish or. wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal c3mmunity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate o important e- amples of the major periods of "history California,' or prehistory? b. Does the troject have the potential to achieve Phorke,. ,, . -.o the disadvantage of long -term, ' ea�_lronmental goals? (A short -term impact on th_ environment is a;1e which occurs in a relatively f brief; definitive period of time while long- term impact$ will endure well into the future). c. DoLs the project have impacts which are individually lim ;ted, but cumulatively 1 considerable? OCumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an ! individual project are considerable wren viewed in connection with the effects of.past projects, and / probable future projects). - d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? - ✓ II. DISCUSSION OR EMRONMENTAL s- .VALUATInN (i.e., of affirmative the answers. to above questions.plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures)_ r— RESOLUTION NO. ® A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO!4`ISSION OF HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12835 AND DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12835 hereinafter "Map" submitted by Oversea Realty Enterprises, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing thq real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a multi - family residential development comprising 132 condominium units on 3.52 acrcc of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 du /ac) located east of Vineyard 6001 feet north of Arrow Highway, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on May 14, 1886; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditiw,; set forth in the F,ngineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the ' Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has consid,,: d other evideno? presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to en at ve Tract No. 12835 and the Map thereof; (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; _4) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c1 The site is physically suitable for the *ylle of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to ;ause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habita -t; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, ,now of record, for access through or use of the property wither. the proposed subdivision. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION TT 12835 (REVISED) OVERSEAS REALTY ENTERPRISES May 14, 1:486 Page 2 (g) That thiF project will not create adverse impacts on the enrr,, �nment and a Negative Decla� -ation is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12835 and P. -sign Review thereof, a copy o w -1c6is attached hereto, is hereby approver subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditi ms: Design Review: 1. Special la;sdscaping treatment shall be provided along Vineyard Avenue, at project entrance and at the recreation areas, and to be in a unifying theme. Also, accent trees and shrubs shall be used to delineate pedestvian connections to central open space and Bear Gulch School, ;ubject to review and approval by the City Planner prior co issuance of building permits. Texturized pavement shall be provided to the entrance the project. 3. New Eucalyptus windrow shall be provided as replacement on a one -to -one basis.to the northern property boundary, per Ordinance 37. 4. `Ins upper unit of the two -story stacked flat shall have a private open space of 150 square feet. 5. Pr,ivide evergreen trees (15 gallon) at a rate of two per side elevation of each building in order to soften building mass and to serve as a backdrop to side elevations throughout the project site. 6. Final landscaping plan shall include planting of deciduous trees near windows along the west elevations of all buildings to minimize solar heat gain and :wise mitigation measures, ie, berming, noise attenu -:ion walls, and dense landscaping along Vineyard subject to review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Provide two (2) pedestrian connections to the east for Beach Gulch Elementary School. 8. Applicant shall submit an acoustical study prior to issuance of building permits, which indicates mitigation measures to acMeva interior 45 CNEL maximum. Construction plans shall conform to the recommendation of said report. j 9. Provide emergency fire access to satisfaction of the i, Foothill Fire District. �L4 11 E, [a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION TT 12835 (REVISED) - OVERSEAS REALTY EENTERPRISES May 14, 1986 Page 3 10. Shade cover (i.e., trellis) shall be provided over all trash enclosures. 11. Provide one lrs gallon tree every 20 feet on center and landscaping (shrubs and groundcover), alonq the entire east property line. 12. Submit a detailed lighting plan to include both high and low level lighting for review and approval by,the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 13. Submit sign permit arplication and details of project directory sign and other monument signs to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 14. Details of carport elevations shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 15. Provide enhanced side elevations. for Buildings "A ", "B", and "C" to City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Engineering Division: 1. Existing overhead telecommunication lines and electrical lines less than 66 K.V. from the first pole nearest the soith of the project to thn first pole north of the c project limits shall be placed underground at the time of construction of improvements to Vineyard Avenue. 2. The accumulated drainage from the tributary areas shall not exceed the capacity of the existing Bear Gulch Street. A strom drain pipe may be needed to accommodate 100 year flow from subject property to Arrow Highway. 3. That portion of this site as indicated on the City's Master Plan of Strom Drainage shall d ;ain to Vineyard Avenue. 4. The east scde of Vineyard shall be widened to accommodate a right turn pocket with required transition taper to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY, 1486. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: . StUft, eildifilldil " PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION TT 12835 (REVISED) OVERSEAS REALTY ENTERPAISES, May 14, 1986 Page A ATTEST: Brad Buller. Deputy Secretary 2, Brad Buller, Depuvy Secretary of the Planning Commissions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, do tvthy certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regulai° meeting of the Planning Couanissicn geld on the 14th day of May, 1986, by the fallowing vote-to-wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HOES: C0MM S-IOHERS: ABSENT: CO AISSIONERS• 1 Z 4J u O L Ci I Ell G �e �d4 -du YOV4>7i NDpq ^� 12 xd UIT .Ux dN LM •"G d O LL U A'pI�GC A.� d pNL d� 4t tDA OnE =G 34 C y �• d A w 4 0 C O A. � M E� y 0 y, y N ■+r N ONf..I 9 YN C�G e N S�Y. N. � yyyatl ',dam y,D0. >Of � Lbw wwV Ua ov A ay a d Y ecL� � wuM Lw° ar�L ° u4o m�`A.�r �raY+3 dyL 4tlrngd p tL gU � u`YL }ao�uY 8N a'.-K L' Eu -w.a a Epp EE6 d �N. � L e D4NA LTwLL�pG OG �� DxO OIL O.O b 01 Ady yNj q6� O � A p 8yuNN OC E.� O�n°q!,yL y a o Lj`♦ ^�~O °r�L A69 w,V 4 �: y � 7W 6iTEE LD ii C4C �V a 4 N Y�yry Aar � �O d�.F Qd¢� Yo env N 4�opu tlj we°'. w yLS�E .5� M1�G Uxia Gc { �Y N> AUYY i . COM 6.'r V A d� 7 •S- e L iD Z� i- O O O N .0 Y M � N� Y r S R O N 0: £ .°G p l 6 U d m i E o v C. O w � H Y y L gEOMgx � e .•o. aN t ^:A NS Off`• 6 N.Q. USG d Ay �"r.00 y �~L W Z-> u ( 11� q O N uNi'C Y Zw OyA O� LpTA `, t9 d�c N u �''� a1Tg ECai F ^at t!:5 Y y^ �n iO lf; c:qn -'Iw d d'•, 9 OS x y° Aa e�9n YZ NC Iz tl u 4 0. L Tu OO ECS EI N 6'r- 0. 'm n N 6 v J o :. l° G V a 6 3 1' Y w9vtir G4 Ta t»ai TV-?1 t I= tv dV aar E+d w. ate. tc mppc roa ca y.9.+_f�a:c aL aav Pp¢.� EVV CN w� Ga ra Ma y^ 4 tQ.Sb NM3rS ``G GC 3 4M ^fi .PV •+G � 4V �Y M7 i' N\- `pyp�• 4CNa .O� NA ,ay yX y a4 @dNi/agi adn.L °W w cad o'N.r^ C tl]aLp ay aNd]y prN9 Y 4' EG ^° Y) YGY T��J C cSG }30,1.0 O.I. \.. 2q.4 Cam. a¢Y.^• ,mod :- 4 L... L 7' IC ¢' a«. bf 4 aSdCL rYiL 2b N.r L ^qAY 4l %- C Y d 4 a N r D °� '.• A V¢ 4 h« L� .\+ k S' ^D G'EyErw � as RNd Y +,'ta„LT,SN U. aL wp�y +'xY N Uq O6\•e are -.`« GNw%d i\a'D dN•if OfXyc yra`+ 0.LNLa yr3nM \' ie•SW•G �"'0.A4.4 ANT V`1YA 9Qa � raG� �L N. c v' c,- Aac° 4.gL ,=UaC� "�C'c 9a Olddsy 4^ 4Nwy;C N'3^ G mMN �. az; pw\wyr.� .R a Cb �Ldti G rnL�4 ^O roN EY G a7 V"� GUN t Fa+ ^ . VI« N'tb o. ort_ *YarEM�Ci�� Y� jgYyY P 90 � T Ny9 \vy AP.. In prd TryiO 2;;r � c Ea a,� _N Q!r 9'6 NL�ky �� °SGN N CMG S N ra Y]42� ,IW p °r A cYG Ag4r�Or" .✓p aC cQO^ a cwxz G "' V9 tz m 3U cA at L t tl). byMre ¢yV CW Aq Ev N; �N L ~t fP G� C ~'A GP��1. OTiRML VLb c p \dLd E. aE a Lu•. -a I� _ c ^ yVG ES 74 M1 �� Cfw�M�n24V w C.r W EM dC ^ p y `qq C �+. 4.D 6 viYi VM ViNL X FM ¢S tad O .�Iar N.'n d+ar+�•F �G �Fauii Hit Y a a a N ViY c aN•c '�vc.ao »lrosp ca'O4u .+.4yp A y N td!ya -w V 2 UC tV M EfaO Od�d- N yS ~ N C"9 N c� �S„•a C 9dAr.. LlA py 0..Cww tad 'p .lroL VpdN U FY Y c O a.a.. G¢ a4 ! Uy TOo Yp 9 Oqa V' ��6�aN �pL Or6? E GdF G9ad+N Cd C0.v }�. arX NG�C Y,w �c.4gG 11 d� Lqc, : am r_ � E" V4 4rAOM' ara� T rC N «ro2q. NM ^+•p6 v� Y`. dmr_i a=qO ci ror4"C +rr a4 p a.°Y�o �^ ^�X �a \L� O N u9i ♦d613 dam^ qdq. aL ¢`' ^,.0 GG C•�ad .a L °^! u dy}.. rid W9 dA 9.� Sj }dC ro CfCNN je^ N i..9. N 4 ^j qN. C r Y..V��Q LVLL uroM �G CL Ct ✓ W 4 t Lam. a"'. �•- i Yq MNT .+ G.a VV M 4• =�vyi ��V YY yur-St CiA V� 'Vo roy yi v`La g ='a° � c ^s OS\. l��urd o'c rcca °. OSy yvG- ud:� U�L °o A N � i�d Lq U 4 p �RR KA 0.LG ~NC. r•LS NON 'sLrN� yield u y4Y ° Ta 9«9F4 p <V r`a.¢t' Y. d t•. \G � al ..Qi t� Y a a a N ViY c aN•c '�vc.ao »lrosp ca'O4u .+.4yp A y N td!ya -w V 2 UC tV M EfaO Od�d- N yS ~ N C"9 N c� �S„•a C 9dAr.. LlA py 0..Cww tad 'p .lroL VpdN U FY Y c O a.a.. G¢ a4 ! Uy TOo Yp 9 Oqa V' ��6�aN �pL Or6? E GdF G9ad+N Cd C0.v }�. arX NG�C Y,w �c.4gG 11 d� w � J N AM Z 40 V N O Ci. bOYiJ `O^ CO ,p �C CU O^OOU�YfbLAO �Ut a EL`d "Z.2 ..•Y N T6 5.01 AU��OwU. cp �, _. d. �e �i1 C �+ d • ALL+ r EV: vue.d...d ^01 bNY0 NN^ E o.TT qa,`c,, o. Y ,^ F NC �� • u u y �� i i d d ^� A A � 4 QIA L p � A,4!. SL C9bno.UrYY. � �.-A A �••� ASH. uu - '" ou Nw�4a vO ° °- .°H ""� u `,N °° A °. N •lil d d u $ d `o nw m Nr va Hd � . OCY L ya d.n ^.fIC Y Wa nNO.N LOlY C'= oroW CO Ms ,sn:: oA..^ on' E olu E c' id. ° n2A .IG U' AU �tL'N bN.M NE NOo .c.-° rN_uq_ CNUq�.. AV4d J � Y°v �L C �� D•np tr�N00 ,�dv`.0 r N W ° ,SC v cpC aA. Yy NYK rnYi'NL ANA -O.j O_ C» tyA ^ d dd4CN di ^Nei 6 �W� L E �yycU6 ts.A °. _ yqC CIQOY Ev Eu to .aei�i� vo�� odv+° -L NCN.Nx CN^ qN 2N0 FNS 4N V��GIY OI pA N_60 gACOG .4V liCA6N a _32 rn� L'r as' �= O M a d o� 6 O N� aL ,r _ W o OII` y v ¢oc .°^E ^pp La •A d C> E M N 6 N q 9E. >°c`n '• c °n`Yo ULQQ ir'ny OCa ~h4 plf� E .c,.ya. uyvg�aui � L'• �dLY .FayNjN none °ila°`n= qua rnA..g C ...mod a' u° aL °Ip E d vN� •-A Ieu NeV•i d•'a sLn x uGU L C4NA w6 pUNn°a l,•°. N • N M t lvt.1 O p C Ad C d d. UY Y n N qo YuIA O W n9c _ uaA Ay 6Q tT A EO`? 11�- O AN Yd N Co ^ W� tab NuU °",a �•� A E C Az �9 nd+ r i YZ NL L^ 5 d C`Ly is u NvN N^ r v° 3> U� r9 n um gY1°`o E y U O 1e Y LAG �n wn Y N dd + V • n� .r-Y- 22 6 N UT u U A 10 n = d n cu eYO u=a ¢sOna . u..�c 4`A t -.z aav N fn°n nZ os air ¢v �uL$ r °°, y`o a _32 rn� L'r as' �= O M a d o� 6 O N� aL ,r _ W o OII` y v ¢oc .°^E ^pp La •A d C> E M N 6 N q 9E. >°c`n '• c °n`Yo ULQQ ir'ny OCa ~h4 plf� E .c,.ya. uyvg�aui � L'• �dLY .FayNjN none °ila°`n= qua rnA..g C ...mod a' u° aL °Ip E d vN� •-A Ieu NeV•i d•'a sLn x uGU L C4NA w6 pUNn°a l,•°. N • N M t UC _o ^ iCCA ~ m cE ' YC U Vc • T^ LU dGp w T Oad p IL^ � ; q O.M E. L ^L E.�u >r L ao u �dc ' w ��uo �a^NiNLLS c A =�N •� •ti+ 6 L c = ^ � •' QJ W O 0 n� ,., c a Y W g° q d C 6' d a. 4f 4 00 ^LA AE �a A ^d LLO 2 =V. CNNYU U °d Vy�G1LL ^a � �a A o ° F. ..ccU ^ ^ yz'^ L W ^L O^ A9 pyyyd eN S. } .. ,conk ^a•- pr `.G.°, ar..e.�n v ^�'OU Tll°p- d6q,p y. y b d � V p^ a d d• T m c` V N E E d� � a L C U d G V FIFI l�°roOA IL -46.+ SLLLN6 Adayl� 18 ' Tu O 1-. IY.�6LI.V� N d m�gYd.O N aqi r. p. Vd r kr� G ryg4 [F� '2-- E pc c m oyv 2v «� vaN ^n y u° Lo° re d =U m`. .5 dai .yE..w. AqT cE •_ N � c n +^- � LL S O N2 L� a 4 Ld V •_ T c C C dpNC A^ JOq d« a LCn Vyu OOry4U �� a 2 Nbti_ ED O� L aLU Gym Ec wW dN �V y`N C IT 9 d n�c oa nycz � T vT.i QjN NaLiL y d d Q� rL U U °�... o'^ OLa'v O L N cA Cd ° :2N4d L LOGY 'EO ° '^ .�� N L ^ y c d Md R w °� M y U n O�> ° p N V V.pa.E C y AL OCM 6K L .An N.pd m AP nA O ^ do .. V 2 t4 uNx c3 L 10 ad. yi CyNj � O=w Y ^ vN9 A Td NO Hy V OL. wLL .-.yL C- ULL N w� T �N20 c mt a. Cd HNa Vd d i aa�r°i .-. N6v^ c^' �•N s p O�Y OU+ V� O V E4°. WET Nd AY EE G.4M Y 4' ^q c, V soo 7 noc.°.2 .Nam E o' a+CY Ofd WYi.E Yd4. J c E daeco cH L°u t d d a W l .1 > N o- Yqa �� ► N << d N vm N �iO `a o w~ •'>o-s � 'min qGE 9 v b° I c Lo du cNN 'v "ten Lq^ ui. rnxb oNL od o d a Co`,a-'o- dL1 L Y =« 6wr TC OOrq E ` O O' C D Cgyl �w dN ° oa �.r•�~ Ndaq YEN d d wC. ` 4 �_ N pN M S d E d 6 y¢' U c��E �o E.CV .a °y¢ z� o. o x ud d% c °> V n� ^W dfa nL mow°. f.a T ^nJNC OO Ca Opa O qN E d C N C Q ^ L N L N tg �L° d Nn,t. o � H q. ^ ^9O dL r'L q T°� qE y° •' d RsY [LmLV COYVO OAT N. 7 U.7; 9n✓° dr Cxq. LY°.. d^--O— Cali° t•o �' =a u�Q�N ,uq L Nvd 6L6 6 VM LLq C C.0 q H2_ \ L< < d N o�AaT� c E daeco cH T d rLd.€ vm N �iO `a o w~ •'>o-s � 'min 'm =� a vY�va o m Y Lo du cNN 'v "ten Pq c9 L co« o.N. vs �e c �oon� a� g a A a.tea u v r .a °y¢ z� o. o x cm° v 5 c °> V n� ^W dfa nL mow°. f.a c-.Y o LvuL t•o �' =a u�Q�N ,uq L Nvd �` LLq C C.0 q H2_ dpq °�O q N W09 VU d �L �O pi @u 60 dd GmU 1-0 4 Ki d U �•:+`o °' s o 000 of 'oo. M a �oaaw u � � L n u O.NC T N o L YdEY u L q dy a o.`°^ u do ^ yE � comma :P pN� Y Y ME O G r x rl4 ^, L d it CO .r d �bY O u .n6 N CW y dm1� NS OI u z G n rGeO +Ny w � O n� L.O d u 9 a+ •^ ^ r . = i dP c c sv da oim u9 y TrO n2 L n T .L dae L q W` YT nu « NQV O Y N W SLU G noo dT. Fes. of 9. m. ucc sL °„' ° q..5--g- 6 q G Vi W $ a LY.. .�'u Ea QM 5--g- g gYTu9 c A Nom. p.� 7 qU d (llp L A. W yC1 N C d ^y E +U CLLR Nq L.V G= tLLLe mVaLia iL EN. Es- wN Cr�vap 'O zU w -El ^O. H.pi C LLU�pd zO mw nN CE'u °Lr W.� Ri S 5, L :n La. 'sv NCH ,a}N �o c p r \c0 `Y TL +L TNT ut •-mod a� r iT. �'Yq .,,W P^ pr 10-1 N py9 • U ^4 T d ONT C LN dW C d Y N6W n.- Q.6 r=nM �0�� yl9 kd G. Y.0 QU 6� tyu LLU SC 89 4 i b H b b 0 d U �.w L " o c G •p x g 42 L n u O.NC T N o L YdEY u L q dy a o.`°^ u do ^ yE v yu comma :P pN� F GE r x rl4 ^, L d it CO .r d �bY O u .n6 r RA NS Z O u z G n � tlC u= p d N dP c c sv da oim ^ V J N 6 q G Vi W $ V. .Gpq N6 Ea QM NE Ur N !•f n: s 0 « N d �.w L " o c w L zo 0 s .. x p L n u O.NC T g V IQa! 6 4 YdEY u L q dy a �a ?L p 0• u E O s' p L C p u 2 1p N i d oa x n C 0a j ..G. y IC:1 u -4 Go O LAW n e w NS Z O u z G n � tlC u= w w' u PC « N d �.w L " o c w L � Y L p x p L n u O.NC T YdEY u L q dy a u V y p 0• u E O s' p L C p u 2 1p N n C u j ..G. y IC:1 u -4 Go O LAW n e w Z O 11 of i U Ll v DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 14, 1986 Planning Commission Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil engineer ............... Y ...�.. new rnn�cL. r1nr /7u MIAMI ItNANI NTH— EIR INC. A division of x.57 acres of land into 3 parcels for condominium purposes within Subarea 1 of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the north side of 8th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue -- APN 207- 271 -53, 54, 55. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map B. Purpose To divide 1.57 acres of land into 3 parcel for the construction of industrial condominium buildings C. Location: North side of 8th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue 0. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 0.52 acres Parcel 2 - 0.52 acres Parcel 3 - 0.53 acres Total 1.57 acres E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial, Subarea 1, Industrial Specific Plan F. Existing Land Use: Vacant G. Surrounding Land Use: North - A.T. & S.F. railroad, existing industrial and ._rant property South Single Family Residential (City of Ontario) East Existing bar West - Existing welding shop H. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designationsc North - General Industria , Su area J. South - Residential (City of Ontario) East - General Industrial, Subarea 1 West,- General Industrial, Subarea 1 ITEM R ■f PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 7912 HAHN TENANT INTERIORS, INC. May 14, 1986 Page 2 Adh Y I. Site Characteristics: The project site is vacant and slopes in a southeasterly direction. IL BACKGROUND: Parcel Map 7912 was originally approved by the Planning Commission on March 23, 1983. A one -year extension was granted on March 13, 1985 extending approval to March 23, 1986. Due to an oversite, the Tentative Parcel Map approval period expired. Therefore, Hahn Tenant Interiors, owner, of the property, is resubmitting the Parcel Map for approval. Development Revie!,o 33 -02 and Variance 83 -02 for the development of the parcels were also approved on March 23, 1983. The Development Review has been exterded t�) March 23, 1987 and the Variance expires. April 10, 1987. A cony of the approved site plan is attached (see Exhibit "C "). III. ANALYSIS: This ,rap will divide 1.57 acres of land into 3 parcels with the parcels configured the same as the previously approved Parcel Map. Street improvements and storm drain plans have been approved. In fa:at, the Final Parcel Map is very near to being recorded. IV. EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES: There are overhead telephone Tunes along the frontage of the property. Telephone lines also exisi at the rear MW property line of the project along the railroad right -of -way. It is recommended that the overhead utility lines fronting the project on 8th Street be undergrounded at tiro, of construction of improvements to 8th Street and that the overhead ut lity poles along the rear of the site be relocated, if necessary, to install the drainage facility. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideratioi, is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result she proposed subdivision. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. VII. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of Tentative Parcel Map 7912. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. +'I n PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 7912 - HAHN TENANT INTERIORS, INC. May 14, 1986 Page 3 Am 7 Respectfully submitted, BK - o Attachments: Vicinity Map Tentative Map Resolution Recommended Conditions Of Approval Initial Study . O �n ' ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW � APPLICATION Q p z `> INITIAL STUDY - FART I GENERAL For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must he completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application 19 made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the initial Study and make .recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission wilt make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. f Date Filed: April 29, 1986 r Projert Title: Eighth Street Industrial Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: HTx construction, Inc., 10722 -Arrow Route, Suite 102, Rancho Cucamaonga, CA (714) 980 -3664 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacte Concerning this Project: Brad Scott, HT, Construction, Inc. Rte 102 Rancho Cucamon a, cA (714) 980 -3664 Location of Project: Sth Street w/o vineyard Assessor's Parcel No.: A'P.V s 207- 271 -53, 207- 271 ^54, and 207- 271 -55 List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies A and the agency iss!;ing such permits: ccwb- const. Permit Santa Fe R/ const. Permit , i ,d PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed project:_ The project consists of constructing six small industrial condominium buildings, each building beinafuther divided into four condominium units for light industrial uE— e parking areas will seperate the buildings and landscaping will b. placed at the north side of the parking areas and along the parkway on 8th Street Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: Total project area is approximately 67,350 quare feet proposes: _ _building area is approximately 4,200 sa ft each for a total of 25.000 sq. ft. Describe the environmental setting of the project site including information on topography, soil stability, plants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets):_ The Project - site -is a sandy loa, open space sitting on the north site of 8th Street. Thle site is bounded on the ntz,' . by the Santa Fe R /W, on the west by a weldina shop on the east by "Scotty's Tavern" and on the south by _ 8th_ street, The south side of 8th street is a single- family residential area The Project site,has no known hipt-oriaLl value. The only flora and fauna onsite is some scrub bush and light weeds and an occasional gophe.r. The _property generally -lone- to the sou'henst at about a 19 rate of grade There are no structurez -on the ro ert except for a drainage inlet, which _ will be replaced when imPmvements are made Is the project part of a larger project3 one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually s environmental impac mall, may as a whole have sign %ficani: t xo ,R— I -2 LJ CER'IFICATIOM: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluati�aa can be made by the Planning Division. - Date: 4 /29 /8e Signat e� Ti't'le aa�.dnt ' i -3 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES 1110 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ x 2. Create a substantial change in, existing noise of produce �^ vibration or glare? x k 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire,, water, sewage, etc.)? x ' 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? _X 5. Remove any existing trees? Now many? 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially' hazardous materials such as toxic s0stances, f flammables or explosives? x Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): s i ® i. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate. daily: Not available at this time 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips -generated daily by this project:_ Approximately 30 autos and C- truc;;s _ 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project,.in cubic yards:_ cutting, 1140 C.Y.' Filling 910 C.Y. 10. If the project involves the construction of ragldeatiai units, complete the form on the next page. NAk CER'IFICATIOM: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluati�aa can be made by the Planning Division. - Date: 4 /29 /8e Signat e� Ti't'le aa�.dnt ' i -3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION € The following information siould be provided to Planning Division in the City of Rancho Cucarionga order to aid the school ability to accommodatie the proposed residential district in assessing their development. Developers are required to secure letters from the school district for accommodating the increased number of students to issuance prior of building permits, r Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: > PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: �r r 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin co ;°:;ructions ` 4. Earliest date of r occupancy: Niadel# and # of Tentative 5a r;edrooms Price Rance I -4 t in i6 O 1J !9 't Q. a 0 A ' 0 0 p" subarea 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUC�1 q/� �� ��� may/ �lllldl . j�ttl lTA F1VGitWR,ING DIVISION Iru'' PARCEL MAP 7912` TITIX.. VICINITY MAP FIXTUBIT.- A ,, ft F, HE ao pso tN3 tip F 2. Sw E "A FE MAP IN I yga F, HE ao pso tN3 tip F 2. Sw E "A FE ' 1-4 k ! .. 0-4 i E 7+i p M f d i ! i N � �� A •�i 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY 0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFO -NIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUK1 ER k 7912 (TENTATIVE PARCEL 0AP NO, 7912) LOCATED ON THE NORTH ` SIDE OF 8TH STREET, WEST -IF VINEYARD AVENUE 4 r WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7912, submitted by Hahn Tenant c Interiors and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the north side of 8th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue, being a division of Parcels 1, 2, & 3 of Parcel Map 6316, as recorded in Parcel Map Book 62, Pages 6 & 7, records of f San Bernardino County, State of California; and WHEREAS, on April 28, 1986, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above- described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on May 14, 1986, the Planning Commission held a. duly advertised public hearing for.the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is const-zent with the General Plan. F 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is r consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision snd improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create signific.;nt adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on May 14, 1986. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7912 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION PM 7912— HAHN TENANT INTERIORS May 14, 1986 Page 2 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad. Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Pianning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foreg&!r,,! -Re_, union was duly and regularly introduced', passed, and adopted by the Plannin;Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a. regular meet -ling of th Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: i NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: L 5 CITY")F RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAi. LOCATION: North side of 8th!Street, west TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO: 7912 of Vine and Avenue DATE FILED: 4/22/86 ;p LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcels'l, 2, 3 0: NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 PM 6316 as recorded in Parcel Map Book 62, GROSS ACREAGE: 1.57 Pages 6 & 7, records of San Bernardino Co., ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 207 -271 -53,,4 State of California & 55 ' DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER /SURVEYOR r; Hahn Tenant Inter °Qrs SAME 2 Associated Engineers 10722. Arrow Rte, Ste, 102 312 East "Ell Street t Rancho Cuca. CA 91701 CA 91764 t Ontario Improvement and dedication requiirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Co amonga include, taut may not be limited to, the following: A. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. E 2. Dedication shall be made of the fallowing rights -of -way on the following streets: - additional feet on E additional feet on additional feet on E 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards, I 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated I as follows; X 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent witf-c the map. ''9 « 6. Al- existing easements lying within right-of-way are to be quitclafted or delineated an the map per City Engineer's /^ Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. - S. Street Imorovements , '-' on ' 16.36.120, the subdivider ma,j enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the refiuired construction prior to recordation olp the map and/or building permit issua-ice. l. Construct rull atreet improvements including, but not limited =^ ^"." and gutter, A.G. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of wide pavement within a 40-fuot wide dedicated shall he constructed for all half- section streets. X 3. Construct the followinu'.missing improvements: Prior to recordation of the map. Curb & A.C. Side- Drive et Street A.C. Mrdian Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk Appr. Trees- L!2hts Overlay Island* Other *Includes landscaping and irrigation an meter X Prior t= any work heing performed in the public i fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in additfon to any other permits required. X Street plans shall be a Registered `.,'' "'u".e=' and approved by the C,`x Engineer prior to istcunce of an encroachment permit. X Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X Existing lines of 12KY or less fronting the property shall be undorgroun4ed. B. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer, ^ � .. -------- '9— 1 4 X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with unHarground service. X _ 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted tJ- ai.d approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. X 11. Concentrated drainage flows shah not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. C. Surety X 1. Surety shall be post J and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recordation of the map. 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison r•Ior to issuance of building permit. Q. Drainage and Flood Control X 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2> Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer X 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. A► 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff AIW k E j t E. Grading X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the A Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perferm such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivisicn map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of buildini permit. F. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: Ca1Trans for San Bernardino County Flood Control. District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San. Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) X Other: Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R.R. X 2. A copy of the Covenants„ Conditions and Restrictions (C &R.$) approved by the City Attorney : required prior to re ?,-edation of the map. X 3. Provide all I', ;lity services to each lot including sewerage, water, elrxtric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructun. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. _ X— 6. r, This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTransJSan Bernardino County Flood Control District. EI Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. ' a .' i l? X 11. Notice of intent to join the proposed Median Island ',.andscape District shall be filed with 0e City Council prior to recordation of the Final Map. G. Special Conditions: X 1. The storm drain system, as required, shall be capable of handling 100 -year frequency storm through storm drains and /or through a combination of drains and surface flows with adequate inlet and outlet structures to control debris. The system shall be designed to the ;satisfaction of the City Engineer. X 2. Construction of drainage facilities within private drainage easement at north and east property lines shall be required. X 3. The applicant shall be required to acquire all appropriate approval, license permits, etc. from the Atchison, Tnoeka and Santa Fe Railroad Company for any work wfithin their, easement prior to recordation of the map. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY EW2 -INEER by: �"' t1 i ;J X I. The filing of the tentative map or, approval of same doe;, not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time 4uilding permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes„ physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit'. Usuance for 9. Prior to recording;, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (s'�ets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as referei-.e and /or shuwing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. Notice of intent to join the proposed Median Island ',.andscape District shall be filed with 0e City Council prior to recordation of the Final Map. G. Special Conditions: X 1. The storm drain system, as required, shall be capable of handling 100 -year frequency storm through storm drains and /or through a combination of drains and surface flows with adequate inlet and outlet structures to control debris. The system shall be designed to the ;satisfaction of the City Engineer. X 2. Construction of drainage facilities within private drainage easement at north and east property lines shall be required. X 3. The applicant shall be required to acquire all appropriate approval, license permits, etc. from the Atchison, Tnoeka and Santa Fe Railroad Company for any work wfithin their, easement prior to recordation of the map. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY EW2 -INEER by: �"' t1 i ;J '10 IE F CITY OF .RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REP'OET DATE: May 14, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Gan Coleman, Senior Planner r:&tiIoN�� � ! r 0 1977 SUBJECT: TERRA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NO. 1 - Review of revised e evations. I. BACKGROUND: On October 9, 1985, the Planning Commission reviewed the plans for Terra Vista Elementary School No. 1. The Planning Commission had requested this courtesy review because sf the concern to maintain design quality within Terra Vista. The Commission commented that the proposed elevations did not reflect a quality consistent with what is being achieved for Terra Vista. The buildings were considered unimaginative and lacking in character. Further, the Commission expressed concern that the temporary facilities may become long term based upon the past track record of school districts in general, and the State's ine6lisistent financing policies sor permanent facilities. In developing the revised elevations for the school, Lewis i{omes and the Central School District have attempted to balance the City's concerns with the State imposed fiscal constraints. The attached letter from Lewis Homes explains the revisions made to address the Planning Commission's concerns. Colored renderings of the original and revised elevations will be available at the meeting for your review and consideration. il. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a courtesy review of the revised elevations and provide the applicant with comments. Respectfully submitted 6� Brad Buller City Planner BB :DC :ns Attachments: Letters from Lewis Homes Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit. "B" - Location Map • ITEM S r - a T EARA VI 0 April 10, 1986 Mr. E. David Barker, Chairman HAND DELIrVERED City Planning Commission . City o•i` Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 SUBJECT: Terra Vista Moduiar Elementary School Number l Dear Da;:id: After you expressed concern, on behalf of the Planning Conrairsion, about the der.ign of the Terra Vista temporary elementary school, we asked the architect to uevelon, recommendations for ways to enhance the school's appearance. The archi- tect's study is now compl!te, and, as promised, we. are transmitting the r_w elevations to the Planning Con-mission for review. Three changes have been made, which, in our view, result in a substcntially improved ex -arior appearance. First; tr qht primary color has been introduced to enliven the buildings. Secondly, wall r0ors have been changed around the 0-lows, to break up the monotone building surfaces and highli;ht the horizontal relief provided by the roof overhangs. Thirdly, the - fascias now provide a contrast of both color and surface texture. The crmbined effect of these modifications is a better lc,oking school which we hope is seen as an - mprovement by the Punning Coasni scion. The constraints surrounding the design of this; school have become, if anything, more onerous since I wrote to you about then in December. The Sate Allocation Board is currently embroiled in a very confusing and convoluted attempt to re- define the standards by which it differentiates portable buildings from permanent ones a distinction of critical importance to school districts seeking State construction funding, and of paramount importance for the Terra Vista scnool. The Board recently went so far as to deem the mere presence of utility connections to constitute permanent construction. At its last meeting, the Board determined to abandon that criterion, but has not yet arrived at a workable definition of port- able buildings. The or',y thing that is clear, at this point, is that we must d3 everything in our power to make the Terra Vista school as temporary in' nature as possible, so that it will not ruin the school district's funding prospects for permanent school facilities -- not only in Terra Vista, but throughout district. 1156 N. Mountain Ave. P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 (714) 985.0971 Qeveleoed by Lams Homes [�� h f Mr. E. David Barker, Chairman City of Rancho Cucamonga April 10, 158E Page 2 - U'iI'. we naturally share the Commission's desire that the school be an attractive el, iient of the neighborhood, we hope that the Commission, in re- reviewing the design of this school, will consider the financial and regulatory constraints to which it responds, and which are largely beyond our control. Our effort i s been to provide a truly temporary school facility -- and one that w;ll be seen as such by Sacramento -- without s,acrificina the duality of the educational process that will occur within it. Cordially, LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA r� �n R. Meicher4 A.I.A. Vice President /Project Development JRM /ecb Attachments Color Renderings (2) cc: Thomas W. Garnelia, Ed.D., Central School (District George Wiens, Wolff!Lang /Christopher Architects, Inc. �s r S I 43� � CITY OF RANCHO CUUuVIONGA �' �'C1' � = r unnfn•md.n - ttt333•••�< C =. �, {'h rlcsJ.l:ururttl lefl�c} iiinc 1977 ! {ichardM.Dahi Pamela J.Wri -ht October 17, 1965 Ralph Lewis Lewis Homes P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 917£5 SUBJECT: Terra Vista Modular.Elementar School nl Dear Fig -. Lewis: Thank you for the opportu -ity to review the plans fnr Terra Vista Elementary School R. As y -u are :. +are, the Planneng Commission requested this courtesy review because of the concern to maintain design quality within Terra Vista. The high quality a.- +niqur haracter of the Terra Vista Planned Community can be attributed to a combined efforts of Lewis Homes and the Planning Commission. The ' "..:-ing Commission commented that the pror.osed elevations d d not reflect a quality consistent with what is being achieved for Terra Vista. The buildings were considered unimaginative and lacking in character. The Commission expressed concern w;th the future *longevity of the modulars based 3 upon the past track record of .chool districts in gRneral, anti the State's inconsistent financing policies fat' permanent facilities. It is our understanding that under your agreement with the school district, Lewis Homes will own the modulars and lease them to the school district. We would encourage Lewis Homes to provide more attractive relocatable structures $ in keeping with the design standards established in Terra Vista. A, community facility, such as a school, has such a great impact upon the image of a neighborhood and can either reinforce a strong positive image or detract from it. 1:1a Again, thank you for the courtesy design review. We hope thu Commission''s comments and suggestions will be taken into consideration in the final design ; and a product is developed that would be consistent with the fine reputation of Lewis Homes. 9320 RASF`JWE ROAD. SUITE G • MT OFFICE BOX 801 • RAir'C1.0 CUCA.lIONGA, C ALIFOR.VIA 92730 • (7I4) 968 -I8 t r Ralph Lewis Octot:ar 17, 1985 Page #2 If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ` COMMUNITv DEVELOPMENT DEPAR MEN }' qDav , Vice Chairman Rancho Cucamorga Planning Commission EDB:cv cc: Frank Cosca Jr., Central School District George Wiens, Wolff, Lang, Christopher Planning Commission Terra Vista File Bruce Cook. E � t, 4y, Sri i f f � TERRA WS .7 A- December 13, 1985 Mr. E. David Barker Vice Chairman Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga P.J. Box 807 Ran-ha Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subjec•: Terra Vista KDdular Elementary School Number 1 Dear Mr. Barker: 11 This will acknowledge your letter of October 17, 1985 to Mr. ?ewis, in which you convey the Planning Commission's concerns relative to the design of the captioned school. Mr. Lewis has asked me to respond in his behalf. Naturally, all of us involved in the Terra Vista project are anxious for the highest possible quality of development. We think that everything that has baen done to date at Terra Vista reflects our commitment to excellence, and we plan to uphold that commitment throughout the project. H AEL In developing the design of the school, we Central School District have been forced to operate under two very real constraints. The f=irst was the financial difficulty of attempting to provide a functionally complete school -- 'iiat is, a new site, all site improvements, complete outdoor play facilities, landscape and hardscape, and a full complen,ant of Gore buildings. as well as the Classrooms and all necessary furniture and equipment -- without letting the costs soar to the extremely high levels typical of permanent sthooi construction. This was a very difficult, challenge for the architect, Wolff /Lang /Christopher, and one that was met only by the application of a great deal of creativity, flexibility, compro- mise, and hard work. The constraint .here was not the amount of fees that we would otherwise have paid -- the school as designed will cost several million dollars and represents an investment substantially in exs;ess of even the District's fee level -- but, rather, simply the economic ceiling beyond which we could not prudenLly go without jeopardizing the economic feasibility of Terra Vista. The second constraint under which we have operated is the impenetrable confusion which surrounds school finance issues in Sacramento, and the uncertainties inherent in attempting to design our school facilities program in a way that will be consis- tent with policies which have not yet been enunciated by the state agencies concerned. The uncertainties arise largely because our program with the District is one of the first of its kind in the State. The main objective of both us aed the District is to have a permanent, state - finances; school built in Terra Vista at the earliest possible date. It is ironic but true that in order to preserve the 3istriet's eligibility for State funding, our temporary school must be as Am 1156 N. Mountain Ave. PO: Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 (714) 985.0971 Developed by Lems Homes L eij ' Mr, E,, David Barker, Vice Chairman Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission December 13, 1985 Page Two temporary in design and appearance as possible; and the more it looks like a permanent school. the more likely it is that the State will withhold such funding, thereby turning our temporary school into a permanent school by default. This would be disastrous for all concerned. The critical importance of playing by the State's rules has overwhelmingly dictated the nature and design of our school facilities. This extends not only to construction details -- where, for instance, we had to abandon our plans to construct the buildings on slab floors as the District, and tire, preferred -- but also to design issues, in that it is essential that the school not only be'temporary and relocatable, but also that it look temporary and relocatable. The Bear Gulch school; -for instance, which was mentioned as an example we might have emulated, does not meet the State's tests which appear to be evolving in Sacramento, and may very likely be deemed to be a permanent scIlool, which would be quite a setback for the District's funding prospects. We are unwill- ing to risk such an outcome in Terra Vista. Nevertheless, because we respect and appreciate the guidance that the Commission has given Terra Vista for the past several years, we referred your comments to Wolff /Lang /Christopher. They, in turn, prepared a response, and a copy of that res -cnse is attached for your reading. We further requested that they review the plans, and develop recommendations for ways to enhance the appearance of the school. I apologize for the tardiness of this response, and I assure you that as soon as we have received the results of the architects' efforts to enhance the appeariance of the school, we will return them to the Commission for review. Thank you very much for your continued interest in Terra Vista and Lewis Homes. Sincerely, t_ LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA chn R. Melcher, A.I.A. Project Development ]RM /mb attachment .,y. V fl Arch f October 22, 1985 A OCT 25 1905 UPLAND _RECEIVED- OCT z 5 1985 ARCHITECTURE DEPT. Mr. John Melcher Lewis Homes PO Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 RE: Review Comments from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission Terra Vista Modular Elementary School #1 Job No. 84- 186.30 Dear Mr. Melcher: As you are aware, the Planning Commission responded with a less r than favorable review of Terra Vista Modular Elementary School # We, however, as a professional architectural firm, take exception to their comments as outlined in the letter. It is obvious that the Planning Comrris >ion is unaware of the constraints that Centro' School Cistrict, Wolff Lang Christopher Architects, and Lewis Homes have designed this facility under. It is unfortunate that the budgetary constraints were not appre- ciated and the res•_lting design be viewed in that manner. Tire comments that the school was unimaginative and lacking in character shows their ignorance of numerous portable school buildings that have been designed and placed in countless schools throughout the state that are no more than plywood boxes lined up in rows upon asphalt paving. We believe that our proposed site plan is highly responsive and imaginative in the way that the classrooms have been arranged into clusters that form around in- terna' courtyards to facilitate a sense of place for each cluster and provide a cohesive plan for the entire fully developed pro- ject. By having the buildings clustered together, they provide an exterior a,pearance of a more substantial and attractive building than ould be if they were all separated by 204 wide asphalt paved alleyways. The exteriors of t di he building, we feel, are also above ' �> ve the standard portable able classroom type,. We have provided operable windows on two opposing sides of the classrooms to facilitate 9375 Are 4j;/ald •Building 200 • Rancho - Cucamon a . 9 Cali`ornia . 91730 (7141987-0909 _ ; better natural daylight?ng and ventilation. A substantial 4' overhang with a 2' fascia has also been provided above the win= doves. The color sche5ie, -which incorporates a wainscoating and accent trim appearance around the entire building, helps to strengthen and unify the overall appearance of the school. While the "se buildings are considered to be portable %,4nd are not designed as permanent facilities, .thev a'.Fe of; substantial con- struction quality. When compared to the standard type dential construction techniques used today, t'iese shoolfbuild- ings are of at least comparable levers of quality, These build - ings will have a life span that will far outlast the length of time that they will be required for use by Celitral School District. Landscaping is also an important element that is an, asset to this proposed design., Rather than surrounding the buildings with asphalt paving, they are entirely surrounded by either a land- scaped courtyard or landscape areas with concrdte walks. The school has been designed to be adjacent to amd allow improvements' of the permanent school playground, The desic!n also provides the temporary school with a good circulation link with these play areas. As design professionals, we at Wolff Lang Christopher Architects believe that we have met the challenges of pr4`vidi -ng Central School District with a facility that will fulfilltheir educa- tional requirements far a temporary basis, stay within the budgetary and space requirement's as defined in the agreement between Lewis Homes and Central School oistGic; and provide the community with a facility which will be much_rrore of an asset than a liability to the neighborhood in terms of both design and function. Sincerely, oorge/ M. Wiens ` rchitect AIA GMW /no x Ili n E i 1 (•"'1"- • "•"•`^^�I '� •� 4¢ L•lIiVO Y HO nvano OM�NYtl s� y6u 1f1 loo�� ,'Wvmaa I� r + u i VwM MUM, dill n a, .9N I - - ----- .J� LAAH I M14 v ,d + v�/, 1 � F • M- !5 O 0 012 o 8 I as. !LAVI�SWM. IL % CL CL IL 0 0 17 cu f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMI ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 14, 1986 ICA 0, 2 i n O O UIL �> 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF A CONDITIOR OF APPROVAL OF ;INOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-05 a ow a b,460 - CALIFORNIA square FINISHED METALS- - A reques o oo metal canopy addition to an existing manufacturin7 , building located at 9133 Center Street. I. BACKGROUND: On February 10, 1986, California Finished Metals su m1 a construction plans to the Building Division to obtain permits for an existing 5,460 square foot metal canopy addition to a manufacturing building. Upon completion of the review of the Plans, Staff determined that a Minor Development Review was necessary for the addition. On April 1, 1986, the Planning Division approved Minor Development Review 86 -05 based on certain findings and subject to several conditions (see Exhibit "� "). Among these conditions, two conditions were opposed to bring the site into conformance with the Industrial Specific Plan: 1. Berming, landscaping and screened walls shall be required along 7th Street in order to visually screen the existing outdoor storage per the Industrial Specific Plan Standards. 2. Street trees, a minimum size of 15 gallon or larger, shall be installed' per City Standards and shall be planted 20 feet on center along 7th Street. On further examination of the site and discussion with the applicant, Staff determined that berming and landscaping were not necessary along 7th Street and deleted these items as conditions of approval (see Exhibit "E "). Landscaping and irrigation lines were installed upon completion of the 7th Street improvements. Berming along 7th Street would necessitate the removal of the existing landscaping and irrigation lines. ITEM T PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 14i 19$6 pl'q 86 = Calif. Finished Metals 'age 2, The applicant has reviewed the conditions requiring a screen wall and planting of street: trees along 7th Street. The applicant is in agreement with the planting of street trees; however, the applicant is in Opposition to the require^�^.nt of a 4 foot high screen wall. As a result, the applicant has requested that this condition be reviewed by the Planning Commission (see attached letter). II. ANALYSIS: The 7th Street frontage was previously improved with a com Tnat o;: -of chain link fenc!'ng and oleander bushes, During the Planning Division review of the project the oleanders were determines to be inddequate to properly screen the outdoor stol•age; the storage area is visible from 7th Street and Center Avenue. The: oleander_ .will take several years to mature to a point when adequate screening will be provided. A�,ditionally, the Tridustrial Specific Plan requires storage area screening within the General Industrial Land Use Category to be constructed of concrete, masonry or other similar materials. The intent is to provide permanent screen materials rather than relying upon landscaping whir, mig not be properly maintained over the long tarm. III. RECOMMENDATICNt Stiff recommends that the Punning Commission review an consider X11 input and elements of this project. If the Commission concurs with the Planning Division, then approval of the conditions for Minor Development Review should be upheld and the appeal denied. Res ctfuily s 'tted, s Brad Buller City Planner BB:SM:d Attachments; Ex{iibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C Photographs Exhibit "D" - Letter of Approval, April 1, 1986 Exhibit "E" - ^upplemental Letter, April 9, 1986 Exhibit "F" - Letter of Appeal, April 9, 1986 1 AOL �j R 7 iV �' lylNtiXa .•Y..,r I LL.+4�Cw. �' . i•.: \�. t~:Cc� v 18;dc' 1� +� xi.s�u ?UYazzCjT++:T fJ :. -.•, zw.�._ t �i� t _4� K 1 "_•. i .w�.,sc i� a�o.se..a '"c y�1 i,.:,�_,�!�3 CIT Y Q:.. RANGE .,) CI TCAMCTGA TM-E: g IrKi S N EXHIBIT.-,-6 SCALE: 77 a 1977 April 1, 1986 r CITY OF RANCHO CUC -A.MONGA x rcrJun D. Mikels C airciGn.mRm Charles Buquet 11 Jeff My Kin1% Richard if. Dahl Pam;aaI.Wrig-ht G. L. Hemenover California Finished Metals 9133 Center Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 SOBJEC'r: MINOR CEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-05 - ROOF CANOPY Dear Mr. Hemenover: The Development Review process for the above described project has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon certain findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and cooperation during this review plrress. We sincerely hope that this process haa• been a positive exper;:r.ce for all involved. This decision shall be ef- 7ective following a ten (10) day appeal period beginning with the date Gf receipt of this letter. FIND • 9S A. That the propa.�d use is in accord with the objectives of tae 'idustrial Specific Plan and the purpose o• the district in which the site is l.icatled. B. That the proposed prtj,ct, togither with the conditions applicable the -a*n_ will not be. detrimental to the health, safety, ;r welfare_ or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the proposed 1.•oject is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific. Plan. D. That the proposed project ,s consistent with the General ;'ian. CON'!I (IONS This project is approved subject to the, following conditions: Planning Division 1. Berming, landscaping and st:reen wail shall be required along 7th Street in order to visually screen the existing outdoor storage per the Industrial Area Specific Plan standards. Detailed plans shall be submitted within thirty (30) days for review and approval. 0 4320 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE C • nS 0 FFICE BOX 07 • $A.'vCI1n CIICAl1fONGA. CALIFORfiIA 9173D �(714) 989-1851 1 G. L. Her (--over e- F Minor Dek opment;, aview 86 -05 April 1, 1986 Pa4e 2 f 2. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or'larrt:. ,, shall be installed per City sta:idard and shall be plpnted 261 orr, tenter along 11h Street. 3. Approval shall - expire, unless extended by the City Planner, if building penni't-- are ;not issued within twenty -four (24) months of the date of approval. 4. AR-nroval of this request shall not waive complcnce with all se,',;ons of the Industrial Specific Pla: -, Development. Cade, aid all other applicable Standards and City Ordinances -in effect at the time of bui?rim , permit ise.uaIlLe. BUILDT';G DIVISION 1. The applicant shall obtain all neces:;ary permits from the 0 144ina & Safety'Division f,ir the metal roof canopy. 2. The applicant shall comply w1rh the latest adopted Uniform 3uilding "ode, On,' arm Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, !rational Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, n.•Mnancrs, and regulations it effect at the time of issuance of rel -,4tive permits. If you should hav: any further questions comments, ,please do riot hesitate to contact Wl:= office. Sincerely, , COMM' I Y DEV OPMENT PA? MENT PLAN I a DIVIS ON Lean Coleman Senior Planner CC:ns cc: Jerry Grant, Building I Saferly Divis•:on '7' -n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG-4)� -11-wJon D. Mikels J; 1 77 Chnrl"J. 1juquet 11 Jeffroy King Richud.11. Vahl 11amehi. Wright April 9,,1986 Richard Arden Mounteinview guilders 2619 South Waterman, Suite C San BernardinG, CA 92408 SUBJECT: MINOR nF,,(F1.nPM-NT =%1M.1 pe p,� - CALIFORNIA FINI11?7D METALS Dear Mr. Arden: This letter is to confirm that I have inspected the project site and determined that no berming will, be required along 7th Street. As we have discussed, a 4 foot high masonry screen wall behind tie landscape setback will be required to screen existing outdoor Rtorage per the I;,-dustrial Area SPecific PTan standards. In addition, '*� I;onditions of -kiproval require 15-90lon size street trees planted ;-;-t on center. Thank you for ta;-.-ng the time to visit our off- Lid ex�lain the circumstancer, svr�Zding the recent 3trE!et lin0ovements to 7th Street. If You Z-hould have any further questions or comwents, pleaso do not hesitate to co,itact this office. Sincere!,,-, COMMU EVELOPMENT,,O--P "�-,'ANENT PLTN N�G Dl� SION k--1 -54 D�.C,jl eman e r .i" nior Planner DC:ns cc: G. L. Hemenover Scott Murnhy V p POSTOFFIMBOX897- k1,XCH0CUC&N1oNGA CALVor L,,1A31?30 14)989_18S�.( Al y April 09, 1906 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 REFERENCE: Letter of Appeal Minor Development Review 36 -05 Roof Canopy ?n Wwwn ;Y: May cnnr orn: In reference to your letter, dated April 01, 1986, Conditions frar Planning Di- vision indicate a four (4) Foot high sere =.n . wall i to be located -,::Long Seventh 5t1 aet. We wish to appeal this condition: because of some exist:ng editions, as fC-lows; - 1. A naw chain link fence hay-, been placed upon the irpproval frcm ;ity ::!f Rancho Cucamonga one year and two months ago, permit number 1506, also at the saw time, all engine -ring, dra:.�iaas, calculations, land, scape, irrigation, and concrete cuLb and gutters, also street construction and pavement, ::ailroad barricades anri street lights were alai cmVletad as per City of Rancho Cucawnga improvpmEnt Pgreement, file reference V -023. As per te1F)h r-e conversation on April 08, 1985, between Mr. •=,'chard Arden and Mr. Dan Coleman, Mr. Coleman agreed to eliminate the fol.lwi.ng items from the April 01, 1936 conditions from the Planning Division. IN- berming and landscaping, but not the four (4) r=oot high scr--en wall on the Seventh Street, we do agree to place street trees as per your, ret uirerents. 2. The second reason not to eonstrezct an additional screen o-all is because we have pl ante6 Oleandar Bushes in front c thr chaise liul: Zencia for additional screening. NOTE: We feel this type of s,=-aning will eliminate the possibility of grafi Ly, as this is a naja: nrobipxii in our neighl- mrhood. 3. The third reasor, is A%-- have a 'oroblem in constricting a: block wall because of an existing concrete retaining wall to support the earth berm at street level against the storage y.md area whim is approximately four v'4) feet below the existing street level. The new block vmU could cause an addi_ tional surge pressure against the existing retaining wall. and cause failure. Your special consideration to these said condditione will be greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, RECEO Co-- Mr. Lee HerrienoveS 1Gi?Y (1F RANCHf CU!• 1MONGA CALIMRNI9 Fn1I�D ML:A:,S FLANKING DIVISION AM APR 10 1986 PM 7A9110lu6211121%141 j16 1E DATE: TO: FROM: 3Y: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCA:YIONGA STAFF REPO ET May 14, 1986 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Dino Putrjno, Arsistant Planner y tom PRELIMINARY REVJEW Ea" -28 - MASCARENAS A consistency determination between the Foovhi1l Ccrridor Interim Policies and a commercial office bu; ".,ing located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Turner Avenue APN: 208- 33 -30. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrouadinc Land Use and Zoning: Project- Vacant, Office Professional North - Night Club, General Commercial South - Single - Family Residential, Low Residential (2 -4 du/ac) East - Day Care Center, Dsfice Professional West - Resta!irant, Office Professional B. Site Characteristics: The project site is a 1.7 acre vacant parcel between two developed sites, Michael J's on the west side, and Kindercare an the east side. T6re site grade is approtimattly � to 8 feet lower than Foothill Boulevard and slopes gra:lually southward. II. ANALYSIS: A. Genera': The proposed projecr- i:; a 3 -story "L" shaped office building in which the entire ground floor is reserved for parking. The second and third floors contain 35,250 square feet total leasible office area. This use is appropriate for the Office /Professional District and consistent with the Interim Policies. The site is surrocsded by fury developed commercial and residential uses with which this project must coordinate access, circulation and landscape treatment. ITEM U I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Preliminary Review 86 -28 - Mascarenas May 14, 1586 Page: 2 B. Interim Policies: The Foothill Corridor Interim Policies are provided to help direct the design potential for development along Foothill Boulevard and guide tie Planning Cornmit;sion decision making process as it relates) to the consistency of these policies. The proposed project is subject to those policies which relate to developmer!`t, thus, not all of the policies ar applicable to the proposed project. These policies are outlined and addressed asfollnws: Policy 1: cayatibilit • All lalsd use and development proposals shall be compatible with ultimate -uses on surrounding pro'klerties, particularly residential uses, andl, mitigate potential conflicts to the extent~, "practical. Hitigation measures may typically include, but are not limited to, Haster Planning, transition of building height, architectural form and density, landscape buffers, sound attenuation, rederction of grind turbulence, visual barriers anVar grading conditions to disy -upt line -of- sight concerns, and alternative circulation and access. Comment: The proposed use is a permitted use in the Office Professional District in which it is proposed. This use is also comp3tiblL with the restaurant and day care use on the west and east sides respectively with regard to combined access, visual barriers, and transition of building height. The proposed building architectural form incorporates a transition of building height at the south elevation near the existing residential uses in order to mitigate line of sight potential conflicts. Other mitigation measures may be applied to this project during the fi,rmal submittal process. Policy 2: Pedestrian P ientation: Site Planning, including R ding orientation ' -fling lot configuration, shall enhricspede;�rian connections on and of+f-site. A continuous Pedestrian system is required in all new projects with connections between buildings, parking areas, street adjacent sidewalks and transit stops. Amities shall be provided such as plazas; shaded seating alcoves, expanded walkways with surface treatment, texturized pavement across drive aisles, raised planters, trash receptacles and drinking fountains. In Wition, outdoor eating areas arm encouraged. In 9 r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Preliminary Review 86-28 - Mascarenas May 14, 1986 Page 3 Comment: The proposed site plan indicates a pzdestrlan plaza area of approximately 1,2200 sgaare feet in the center of the project site at the building office entrance, with texturized pedestrian path connections across. - .drive aisles to the parking area and public sidewalk along Foothill Boulevard (see dttached site plan). The plaza area desig-�t.Pas_ adequate potential for shaded seati;i alcoves drinking fountains,,picnic ' ty-,e tables, and other outdoor amenities. Policy s Combined Access: Through the master p at.nng process, driveways onto Foothill Boulevard, shall be coordinated for consistency with existing City access policies (i.e., 300 foot driveway sv- ,:eation) to the extent practical. regardless of parcel width. E Comment: The proposed project will share access with Kindercare to the east. In addition, an access at the rear of the project site is k proposed to line up with an existing drive aisle to the Hrest use (Michael J's) for, indirect access to Turner Avenue (see attached site Iilan). Policy 4: Streetsca ee and Landscaoinr Streetscape esd 0 0er nt for a fi r�amr projects` shall be coordinated for consistency with the t Tjidelines of Foothill Boulevard in affect at tie time of development, including intensified landscaping aith specimen size trees, berming' and meandering sidewalLs. In additien, sireet furniture, and alluvial rorkscaRe and moniement signs may be r(quired %&.re appropriate. Landscap'inq shall be designed to create visual interest and variety to the ste•eStscape, eachanc,e building arititec ure, buffer views of automobiles, screen utillities and service areas, and distinguish !Westrian spaces from vehicular areas. U- A �; i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Preliminary Review 8E -28 - Mascarenas May 1.4, 1986 Page 4 Comment: The project meets landscape setback requirements for Foothill Boulevard. The landscape concept would bi developed in more detail as part 0" the formal development applicatioir. Policy F: Architecture: The architecture c' new construction shall be sensiteive to the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga and relate to nearby structures s.' community significance. Des gn elements may include, but are not limited to, river rucklfieldstone walls, exposed. beamLark, Mine arbors, curved parapet walls, and covered walkways or arcades. Comment: Although Rlevatior5 are not a requirement of the Vieltnlhary Review, it would be appropriate tv provide input to the applicant regarding their. cori'sistency With the Interim Policy. The proposed architecture is not consistent with the strict interpretation of the Sntirim Policies. Ncwever, the Commission may want to give due consideration to the prop sed contemporary architecture by recommending certain Interim Policy design elements to be incorporated into the proposed design. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine TreTiminary Review 86 -28 land use and site plan to be consistent with the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies and provide direction regarding the project architecture. F Respectfully submitted, Brad butler City Planner b3:DP:cv Attachments: Exhibit "All 1►icin;ty Map Exhibit "8" - Site Utilizatin Map Exhibit 11V - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevation Plans � I'I air 13 d m u L3 nm :tm (I Pj 0 :-" IL 0 F law co T OIL Z" Lj p S J a 1 I n LL ! D Z g 1 0 pp§ -dOYp� ! l I• Q S i l •♦ �. p.' � Zp s n i ia. z Y t Lii 6 LIU T Q 1---- �_ a r z a A� C h N } %1 nG i ■ Q. U-7 LR ■ r5 -13;r p o II r,o U � E 7 DATE: TO: FR0;4: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 14, 1986 0 O, i9r, 1 Chairman and Memhprs of the Planning Commission Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer POLICY FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES I. BACKGROUND: On October 10, 1985, the Planning Commission held a workshop to formulate a policy on the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities. The general policy established at the workshop was as follows: I. All types of streets should have utilities placed underground as a condition of land development. 2. Actual undergrounding may be deferred and an in -lial.i fee paid in those circumstances where the Planning rommission felt it was impractical to underground at the pre, ?nt time. 3. The obligation to place utilities underground should be sharad equally by properties on both sides of a street in proportion to street frontage. Now that staff has had time to gain experience in i,nplamenting the general poliry, it has become apparent that several general circumstances occur on a regular enough basis to warrant their inclusion in a specific policy resolution. Thou items will be discussed it the following section. IL DISCOSSION• The attached Resolution contains what staff understand to be the general policy proposer' by the Planning Commissii- , with ad'itional specific clorificatiion items suggested by staff. Sec ions 1 and 2 contain the general policy as proposed by the P2��ning Commission. Subse:0on Lb. contains some examples of when staff feels it would be appropriate to deter undergrounding to a later date, action 3 was incleled as an extention of the egaal sharing of ctists concept_ Staff has el, countered several cases in which utility lines are located on b5th sides of a street and each contain different types of utility lines. When each is undergrounded by a development on it's side of the street, an unequal cost will be borne by each developer. therefore, this section is an attempt: to equal-.ze the costs. J ITEM V PLANNING COMMISSIOF STAFF REPORT Undergrounding Overhead Utilities May 14, 1986 Page 2 11 Section 4 was included to clarify the fairly common situations where po a lines contain 66KV ar larger electrical lines. Exhibit A shows the location of these pole lines within the City. Exhibit 8 shows conceptually how the various differett types of lines are arranged on the poles. Subsection a. merely state, °hat the 66KV o, larger lines are not required to be undergrouti 11 or in -lieu fees paid; consequently, the lines and poles gill remain. Subsection b. allows less than 66KV electrical lines to remain if there are no telecommunication lines on the poles. Where both less than 66KV electrical lines and telecommunication lines are contained on the poles, they are both required to be undergrounded. Staff is concerned with this subsection. First, it is a fairly cumbersome and confusing concept. Secondly, it appears to be inconsistent in that in one case it is acceptable to allow smz:ller electrical lines to remain and in the other it is not acceptable.. Staff feels it wpuld be less confusing and more consistent to require in all cases that either (1) only telecommunication lines be dnaergraunded, or (2) all utflitiea 'less than 66KV electrical be undergrounded. Suggested wording for Section 4 is as follows; (Alternate 1 - Telecommunications only) Only telecommunication lines are required to be undergrounded or in -lieu fees paid in accordance t,ith sections 1, 2 or 3 above„ OR (Alternate 2 - All Lines) All lines shall be undergrounded -rr in -lieu fees paid in accordance with Sections I, 2 or 3 above, except for 66KV or larger electrical lines. Section 5 was included to define the limits of undergrounding and fee payments. Subsection a. requires payment of fees to include the length of lines to the middle of adjacent streets etc., to eliminate the possibility of small gaps of non-undergrounded lines across those areas. Subsection b. defines ending points for when under grounding occurs. In general, number (1) is preferred, but could add significant additional cost when the next pole is a long distance offsite. therefore, Number (2) was included. Staff included number (3) because it seemed reasonable to stop at a �o *%e that is less than 5 feet from the project limits. The iistinctiot, for corner, properties was included to eliminatt lines crossing streets where possible, because they are considered particularly unsightly. PLANNING COMMISSION STAR" REPORT Underground ng Overhead UtVities May 14, 1986 Page 3 Section 6 provides a method for establishing uniform unit amounts or in -lieu fees. The utility companies have indicated ":hat they are not interested in designing individual prujects just so that the City ca,., determine : fee amounts. They have, however, provided average costs that will become the basis for the fee amounts. The curren' amounts on a per foot basis are as follows: $100 for electrical, $50 for telephone, and $10 for cable TV. One last item warrants clarification. `the Commission nas made it clear that utilities along streets are to be undergrounded, but it has not been made clear whether existi% k,tilities within alleys, railroad rights-of-via,,- (for example along 8th Street), -_*z,:, 4 oulo also be undergrounded by adjac_nt developments. It cou d -oe argued that such facilities, in particular alleys, are not highly visible, therefore, they should be exempt from the policy. If the Commission were to decide that alleys, etc., should be exempted, than the Resolution as presented is acceptable` because it oiily makes reference te. streets. However, if it is di�cided that they are not exempted. it is suggested that the first reference to streets in Section I be footnoted as follows: *A' i references to streets shall also mean alleys, railroad rights -of- !;ray, etc. III., RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Cognnisision approve the attached Resolution subject to choosing an alternate for Section 4, deciding on the applicability of the policy to alleys, etc., and r making any other modifications as necessary. Respectfully submitted, Bar. -ye R, Hanson [ S;;nior Civil Engineer BH:cv Attachments: Resolution of Approvcil Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" :__ Al j RESL'_uTION NO. �* A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNTNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CJCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR THE UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD OTILITIES. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order zo promote a more aesthetic and desirable working and living environment within the City; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to inform property owners and developers of the City goal'. NOW, THEREFORE, be It resolved and established that all developments, unless specificaTly waived by the Planning Commission, shat! be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal of the related supporting poles adjacent to the limits of a development as follows: 1. Lines on the project side of the street: a. Said lines shall be undergroundee at the developtir's expense. b. In those circumstances where the Planning Comtnissi :n decides that v=ide; rounding is Uvractical at present, for such reasons ds short length undergrounding (less than 300 feet ant' not undergroundnd adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users, disruptian to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall ?ay an in-lieu fee for the fail amount per Section 6. c. The Developer shall be eligible for reimuursement. of one - half the cost of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on the opposite side of the street. Lines on the opposite side of the street from the project: The Developer shall pay a fe, to the City for one -half the am3ant per Section G. Lines on both sides of the street: The De _doper shall !�nmply Section a ve n �ew with le for r,=imburseme-.t or pay additional fees so that he betws a total expense. equivalent us one -half the total cost of undergrounoir?a the lines nn both j sides of the street. 4. Pole lines containinq 66KV or lamer electrical. lines: All Un-e s a I I be unV rgroun a d -or—in--1 tea tees pat m accordance with Sections 1, 2 or 3, except. for: .r , --------------- 0741 -02 o 5 -14 -86 P.C. Agenda Packet o Page �8 of 8 a. 66 KV or larger electrical lines, and b. electrical lines less than 66KV, if no telecommunication lines exist on the poles. S. Limits of Responsibilities: a. In -lieu fees: The fee shall be based upon the length of the property being developed from property line to Property line or the center of adjacent streets (alley, railroad or nannel right -or -way, 'etc.) for corner properties. b. Undergounding: Undergrounding shall extend to: (1) the first existin pole off-site from the project boundaries, (2) a new pole erected at a project boundary or across tfa street (alley, railroad, or channel right - of -way, etc,) for corner properties, or (3) an existing pole within 5 feet of a project boundary (not at a corner). 6. Fee Amount The amount for in -lieu fees shall equal the length Per Section 5.a) tims the unit amount as established by the City Council based uNan information supplied by the utility conrpanies and as updated periodically as deemed necessary. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 141H DAY OF MAY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: ra u er, eputy ecret�ry I, Brad Buller, repgty secretary of the Planning Cormnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of t o Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS: Vf ;f ic Ll LOCATION OF 66 KV ELECTEICAL LINES Le end ® - 66 KV lines NSEW -side of street Q-substation CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlt ONG.A ' ENGRMM .ti G MM ON a y 'W G::�� OVERHEAD UTILITIES `F;LOCATION OF 66KV ELECTRICAL LINES �.,�. • • ,: u CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (o" GG KV E/ecirre &! (fly /8/ j ck ccklmlt » rc4�7'104 —c OVERHEAD UTILITIES N T=. RELATION OF VARIOUS LINE iT.-