Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1986/06/11 - Agenda Packet
0701 -42 0 6 -11 -86 PC Agenda � CITY OF RA ACHO CL-CLN 10\GA PLANNING CU'VimISSIONi AGENDA ` WEDNESDAY JUNE 11, 1886 7:00 p.m. UONS PARK COMMUNITY -CENTER 9161 BASE LINE ]RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFi RNLh L Pledgee of AMegiance II. Roil Call Commissioner Barker Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Stout Commissioner McNiel= 11L Annauneements IV. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar iten : r„? ?xpectcd to e routine and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission a', one time without discussion; If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11550 - STERPA -- A total development of 506 condominiums and 8 single family dwellings on 65 acres of land generally located on the south side of Wilson, east of Haver.. Avenue, in the Low Medium District - APN 201- 181 -07. V. F tbiie Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Ctairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinioi-xs shall br, limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. B. ENVLIONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -06 - _AJA - The development of three Researcli and Developmentl0ifice buildings totaling 200,000 square feet on 18.7 arses of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) located at the northwest corner of Buffalo '' Avenue and 6th Street APN 229 - 261.78. a C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CO 5E AMENDMENT 86 -02 - CITY OF _ RANCHO =AMONGA -- A proposal to amend Section 17,04.070 pertain #0 Temporary Uts of Vie Development Code of the (;ity if Rancho Cucan. onga, Ordinance No. 211. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ,&ND CONDITIONAL.FNE PERMIT 86 -08 - ALHAMBRA REPROGRAPHICS INC. -The establishment of a blueprint company in an existing building with F lease space of 2,184 square feet on 0.960 acres of land in the General Industrial/Rail Saved District (Subarea 2), located at 8755 Flower Road - APN 209 - 013 -042. E. MODIFICATIONS OF MULTI -F&V LY DEVELOPMENT= STANDARDS - CITY OF RANCbJ OUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Develop .r at Code to upgrade apa,#ment development standards and to require enclo_ted garages for 911 multi - family construction. Other similar modifications may also be Considered. "F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9896 - BIXBY DEVELOPMENT /LEASON POMER Y ASSOCIATES - A division of 35 acres of land into 13 parcels within the Industrial Park Development District, Subarea 12, located between 4th and 6th Streets and between Milliken and Pittsburgh Avenues - APN 229- 261 -58 and 59. Related project: DR 86 -09. sri. New Business G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELO `MENT REVIEW 86 -09 - LEASON POMEROY ASSOCIATES - The development of a Master Plan for a 35 acre Industrial Park and the first phase consisting of two light industrial buildings totaling 63,474 square feet on 4.7 acres of land in `the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12) located between Milliken Avenue and Pittsburgh Avenue and between 6th Street and 4th Street - APN 229 - 261 -58, 59. Related Project: Parcel Map 9310. H. PRELIMINARY REVIEW 86 -33 - HAYES - A consistency determination between the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies and a proposal to expand the Cub Tavern located :,t 3411 Foothill Boulevard - APN 207- 571 -75. PRELIMINARY REVIEW 85 -83 - RICH - A consistency determination between the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies and a proposed 10 -Bay Auto Service Center totaling 6,400 square feet, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, IF across from San Bernardino Road - APN 201-101-17. ViI. New Business J. BERYL PARK - WE3T EXTEAMON CONCEPT JAL MASTER PLAN n K. CAPITAL IMPRGV' ;MENT PROGRAM VIII. Comion Business EK. Public Vomments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. R. Adjournment E„ A-he PIanning Commission has adopted Administrative "Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the coruent of the Commission k r; VICINITY MAP. ONTARM 7MTfkkAitbNAC AIRPORT' W CrrY OF RAW HO CUCAW*#" i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAVi ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 11, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of She Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner G G�CAA4O� '�`. . 2 i C1 a ! r 0 O U 1977 SUBJECT: TIME., EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11550 STERPA - A Eo�ar ueve opmt—r of con om n-ums an singe amily dwellings on 65 acres of land generally located on the south side of Wilson, east of Haven Avenue, in the Low Medium District - APN 201- 191 -07. I. 3ACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a one year time extension Tor en ative Tract 1155G as described above. The project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on July 14, 1982. A two -year time extension was granted by the Planning Commission on May 9, 1984. Tara maximum time period for a tract map is five (5) years, therefore up to 12 months of extensions could be granted. II. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension and has compared the Proposal with the development criteria outlined in the City's Development Code. Based upon this reviow, the project meets the Optional Residential Development standards for the Low Medium District except for energy conservation. The Development Code requires an alternative energy system to provide domestic hot water for all units and for heating any pool or spa. Solar energy is intended to be the primary energy source. The project as approved does not require solar water heating other than pool and spa areas. III. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Division recommends a final extension of 12—mon s. /4P fu1 �y s�ed B a uller ty Planner BB:CW:ns Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Exhibit "B" - Grading Plan Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Resolution of Approval fcr Time Extension ITEM A TEPA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 200 West Glenoaks Soelevard, suite 2Ut t Glendale f..alifOmia 91202 f 1818) 2460616 May 15, 1986 Mr. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cur- nmonga Planning Department 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, C4 91730 Re: Monte Cucamonga Residential Projwt City File #11550 Dear Mr.. Coleman: I am in receipt of your notification indicating that the approval for the above referenced project expires ouu July 14, 1985. It is my understanding that a maximum one year extension remains on the approval for this project. Please fir-1 enclosed the required processing fee of $62.00 in order to extend the project an additional year. Due to the scope and magnitude of this project, it wes nct economically, feasible to commence tievelopment until final improvement related to the construction of the Deer CrEQk Channel and the improvement/extension of Banyan Avenue had further develrped. In addition, revisions to the project are presen ly being prepared which shall be sutmitted within the near future?. Even though I envisaan these revisions to be minor in nature related to the overall scope of the project designed, we envision apprm als for the revisions will still be required frcr.,Design Review, Administration R +:view and Planning Commission. Consequexltly, it will be necessary that the o<idi.t=nal time extension be granted. If any additional information or action is required, please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience. Thank YOU, for your cooperation and assistance in this matter. ery truly yours, ebastiano Sterpa SS:t Enclosure EN tom *C m fey kCdkgeCm4)t s °'1 t f / A-"- -•ATP- f--- �t1114-5)"� —^i File n wm � � M um rn • sm pop Ply Lkft - -.-- S toW f ment ' r (�3�FRePCSr�u -Ea Rt�sa� i�w�Y.72Danu.e�a1 Phases 7 2 C4 5ts Urit -, A 1012 74 ! 70 70 E 4 1 Udt - B 1212 74 11216 s Drat - c 72 2 8 t to t 6 1121 74" 1121 S 701 Unit - D S 2 Unit - E 24 72 48 1721721721 c Tawnhame Tawntwasc dgc �' Sa `�A'# R J. 'or 0 co 11 Ex E I E it ca. I Lk* GA ct tz F_ k;fa Ji. rc_- TN 1 891�, IZZ, ALTZIEWAL lugfl -5- Eke Ci RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTIONS )F THE RANCHO CUCA!XINGA KANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A ',IME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11550 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above- described project pursuant to Section 17.02.090; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above described Tentative Tract.. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the • T011OWT -9 findings: A. The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies; and, B. The extension of the Tentative Map will npt cause significant inconsistencies with the current (t�ral Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies; and, C. The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause public heai;:h and safety problems; and, D. The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Tract 'Ap cant. Expiration 11550 Sebastiano Sterpa JL_,ie 11, 1987 - APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LAY• Dennis L. Scout, Chairman ATTEST:_ k Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary i r7 "Ct� I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introducci, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamongar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of June, 1)86, by the following irate -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: El Lim E 11 — CITY OF RA-'* 7HO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 11, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -06 AJA - The development of three Research and Development /Office buildings totaling 200,000 square feet on 13.7 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 11), located at the northwest corner of Buffalo A%t;;nue and 6th Street - APN 229 - 262. -78. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration, Conditional Use Permit fnr Research and Development /Office use fr, the three buildings. B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning: North - Warehouse /distri ution building (Pier 1) under construction; General Industrial /Rail Served District - Subarea 10. South - Vacant; General Industrial District - Subarea 11. East - Vacant; General Industrial District - Subared 13. 4—t - Existing industrial use; General Industrial District - Subarea 11. K. • AE 194-7 C. F:neral Plan Desi nnaations: - Project �itS a General Industrial. North - General Industrial, General Industrial /Rail Served. South - General Industrial. East - General Industrial. West - General Industrial. D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and vegetation consists of a decaying grape vineyard which will be removed with the development of this project. E. Applicable Regulations: The proposed Research and Development/Office use within the General Industrial District Subarea 11 requires a Conditional Use Permit to be approved by the Planning Commission. ITER B PLANNING,V,mMISSION CUP 86 -06 - AdA Jun,- 11, 1986 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: STAFF REPORT A. General: The proposed development consist,- of three il, uiat:ve industrial buildings designed for Research and Dfivelopment /Office: type of use. The overall site plan with the building's placement, parking areas, a large centr,'ized plaza area between Buildings 2 and 1, and pedestrian walkways that are interconnected through out the project, cor>olies with the Design Guidelines for the Industrial Specific Flan, lfie proposed elevations reflect a sophisticated style of architecture that consists of painted concrete panels with revels, painted oversize concrete columns at the tffice entrance, and spandrel glass as shown in Exh4bit "G". B. Design Review Committee- The Committee has reviewed the project and has recormended approval with the following conditions which the developer agreed to: 1. Additional pedestrian facilities such as picnic tables, hardscape, be provided to the plaa;a area. Detail design of the plaza area be brought for Design Review Committee review and approval prior to issuance of bu4 ing permits. 2. The proposed triangle shape skylight is too small a scale compared to the building entry statement (rce Exhibit "G -411). The applicant should either enlarge the skylight, provide other architecture elements to accentuate it, or eliminate tha skylight feature. (The developer has indicated the proposed skylight feature would be eliminated.) 3. Additional 6' wide landscape fingers be provided to the north elevations of Buildings 1 and 2 and west elevation of Building 2. C. Technical hM ew Committee: The Technical Review �"Wmittee has reviewed the project and has recommended a maximum of three (3) driveways between 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue will be allowed for this project. Therefore, the applicant should remove one of the driveways along Buffalo Avenue or the westerly driveway on 6th Street. According to the developer, a total of four (4) driveways (two an Buffalo Avenue and two on 6th Street) are being proposed because of the need to separate truck traffic from auto traffic. The developer is requesting for fuil Planning Commission discussion !regarding this issue. Pursuant to the City Access Policies, all corner parcels should takw access off a local or secondary street rather than a major. boulevard. Also, where access must be granted to a major street, it is 'limited to one point per 300 feet of frontage. Since there is a B-- `�' , 11 E 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 86 -06 - AJA June 11, 1986 Page 3 planned median opening approximately in the middle of the site frontage, it is most logical and appropriate to line up the driveway 4aith the median opening. The developer is providing such access. As stated by the developer, the reason for prnposing four driveways is to separate truck traffic from auto traffic.. However, tracks coming from 6th Street would have to enter at the main driveway access whore there is a median opening for left turns. Therefore, the second driveway on 5th Street would not totally separate truck traffic from auto traffic. The proposed two driveways along Buffalo Avenue would not create traffic conflict or be inconsistent with the access policies. D. € nvironmental Assessment; Staff has c#-Wleted the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with these,, findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order following the CUP hearing. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project and the proposed ReAeareh and Development /Office use are consistent with the General Plan 4 -id the Industrial Specific Plan. The project will not cause significant adverse -- vironmentai impacts. The proposed use, buiiding design, the site plan with the elimination of the second driveway on 6th Streets and the recommended conditions of approval, are In compliance with the Industrial Special Plan and all other applicable provisions of the City Standards. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a public hearing and notices were sent to all pr operty owners within 300' of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATIONt Staff recommends that the Planning 00mission make a determination concerning the number of driveways and approve Conditional Use Permit 86 -06, and issue a Negative Dr_ ;aratioa. „r sp tfuli.y,s'bm to Bra Bull r City Planner BB;NFtko Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Summary Development Table Exhibit "D" » Detailed Site plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Landscaping Plan Exhibit "G" » Elevations (4) Resolattion of Approval, with Standard Conditions 0-3 t Ell x k:✓ r -.� a a �r !�-�• `' I • • f to • • ,, .,'� �...,�'i -!i'r � .s 77 14 Aji • tt.: fr � .3" E i" D i 11 � 4 r w (,i j N � 1 EX137iN.q � `{ [((t �� +rte L 9 MCIHN4 L�; A MOJEV t 4 r , 1tK1gRiAY� 1 +� 1 V1Nk Y.5,'�S t r 4P05 1 ��� y VINEYA9A8. EXISTlR6 4RAS9 BERM NORTH CITY OF ��t� RANCHO CUCA.i ONGA. TITIa�: �� Jr1/� %s��P�1t/ i'LAININIi IG rR7 aLAli EXHIDIT= . _ r CA f Yj PART If INIFORM APPLICATION $ NON•RESILIENTiAL PROJE SUMMARY DEVE L®PMENT TAMP, Project Name Ranch Cucamonga R&D Center it Reference File P Location : N. W. corner of 6th & Buffalo Ave (Staff (fie Only) General Plan : Industrial and warehousing Development District. Sub area 11 Gross (Incl. area to centerline of abutting street): acres: 15.71 Net (exclus; ,e of dedication fnr major e)tarnal and secondary streets): acreb: 13.77 iing Coverage : 4.59 200,000 33.4%, LEtn lscape Coverage 1.93 84,211 14.0% Jehlcular Area {incl. parking): 6.86 298,610 49.8% Hardsca.pe coverage .39 17,000 2.82! Area of Building Pad No.,of Stones Gros,, FloorArea (sq. fxi'.) Proposed 1 one w/ Potential mezzanine 102,000 R&D 2 one w/ potential mezzanine 60,000 R &D 3 one w/ potential mezzanine 38,000 R&D Type of Use Parking Ratio # of Spaces Required # of Spaces 1 R&D 1/350 290 395 2 R&D 1,350 171 232 3 R&D 1/350 109 152 Total No. of Parking Spaces Required: 570 Total No. of Parking Spaces Prcv:ded: 779 No. of Compact Spaces 237 Of Compact Space to Total Space : 30% IE 1 5. fF a ;a- __ iS s+r exre t ` 7 O � mi UZU }( 3U$ eei L UP .ads �g1 z 0 c� U 0 x U z s,. 0o m R O W N tl A A tI C2 pW t omn g �o w +' g z 0 S m F m r my rT ,1 i- yea a V�a `3g 2�e 4 Y i k J •� Q 2 a E ILI G- �3 U � a �t re 1�i� C u _ w• _Ai � 1._ Y Y Y Y� t: g L iv+ d/ � J i� w 9 i 13-/0 r4. LA 2_qC 49 Z �. o gwl a z L CJ (1 U a �O A UW a Em r Em I E E3 111,3-11 Lo zo IIJ C,6 �i z y w 3 co If I MR, LA a < Z o �� O o p 2° } W3 LU Qg z 0 U D U O 2 U z Q ui V o F-i Qw �U ti tl E g w � � W � w e r �d u n a a3 11 0 z m f� -o3 0 U U J co -< Z Wo O Z V �` V O z Z cc �W U Y n Q a� Z Q U U Z cc Q p r.y V O° ©U � C-' r C) a n i U Z I� 0 -o3 0 U U J co -< Z Wo O Z V �` V O z Z cc �W U Y n Q a� Z Q U U Z cc Q p r.y V O° ©U � C-' r C) a UV Ir -tj RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86 -06 FOR THREE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMEWOFFICE BUILDINGS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND BUFFALO AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DIS ,RICT WHEREAS, on the 21st day of May,, 1986, a complete application was filed by Gilbert Aja & Associates for review of the above- described project, and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of June, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: i 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the -londitiotis applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on-the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on June 11, 1986. SECTION 3: That Co- ditional Use Permit No. 86 -06 is approved subject to the following Conditions and attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: 1. Additional pedestrian facilities such as picnic tables and hardscape shall be provided to the plaza area. Detail design of the plaza area shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and approlai prior to issuance of building permit. 2. The proposed triangular shaped skylight is too small a scale compared to the building entrance statement. The applicant shall either enlarge the skylight or provide other architectural elements to accentuate it, or eliminate the skylight feature. "X,5�_ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOWTION NO. CUP 86-•06 - AJA June 11, 1986 Page 2 3. Texturized pavement across circulation aisle or within plaza area shall be of brick pavers or other materials subject to City Planner approval. Full samples shall be submitted to Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of huilding permits. 4. Additional six fczt wide landscape planters shall be provided to the north elevation of Building 1 and Building 2, and west elevation of Building 2. 5. The proposed four handicap spaces for Building 3 shall be evenly distributed. 6. The applicant and their leasing agent shall disclose to any prospective tenant, in a written format to the satisfaction of the City Planner, 'the following limitations of this permit: A. Buildings 1, 2 azl 3 are intended for Research and Development /Office use and ,:marking provided accordingly at a ratio of 1 space per 350 square feet. Further, no use in these three (3) buildings will be permitted which requires parking at a more intensive ratio than that provided. B. No use wiil be permitted unless allowed by Subarea 11 of the Industrial Specific Plan. 7. Any revision or me,.ification to this Conditional Use Permit shall require application for said chance and review and approval by the Planning Commission as prescribed by the City's Development Code. En iaeering Division: 1. All pertittent conditions of Parcel Map 9670 shall apply.. 2. The applicant shall maintain a maximum of three (3) driveways between 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue with no greater then two (2) driveways on either one of the streets. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary 1? -/�v 0! of PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NJ. CUP 86 -06 - AJA June 11, 1986 t. Page 3 r f 4_..i I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission, ox the City Of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Peso' was,, duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comm;ssen of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commssion, held on the 11th day of June, 1986, by the following gate -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0-19 O Z 41 U Q� 0 i n. y� t gCON C .%V. NDG 4Q� at nSo ".-u�° avN.°an eo' 06o n-- °Na. •�>, � u^ - LJ 6LL� uuibw Jit Lv'cY mY aL:� n NL ui•- o � a�, °no u r u sT °u OaY w •� +Yi° •- Y e� 1°r°a� O q^ VO L u L 9 w y g w °t rbw Oa E`c •C �= wow ...�R 9 a+ 3yd L d'a v�.-ul v °V y cu Y� c uI wYUUV =ay N'L.'�« tovdi ^Lt ooh �� °c° 'd a�a�v� C3clwp «dam - ^� ^-0 T-1 :5.� O pIa C ,o - =S y Y wo w .. ° u•=�N id o.. EVNN � Eu '€ L �.°Y�d �ao.q oo.�°.yY asc aN��N wqO v•°�-t^"u'"�°� q C.ry}Y�V NNCpa 7.C�d« Na byA g4 w • YV i1C Oyw�u �Fatr y' _ Vc?ai� pyY LR^dw �M Ru^',�q« A ° T« d y p d •� L A W 4 °•� D• C w L L w N ^ L 9. � 'f R cYy �QRM... ytj r ai•d. Q C; a N L' (w Np4y L �° � •c AY G i Y °G a1°. pG�EIpu jY � 94 E.Q^ y.0 L EOY w c`E VOI°cp d.YUYL °Q^ t0. •'b c Nw Y dUq nCGOyv .9.. O 24! A L. •r. d L ... > C Y N� 4 Y �i�L� E d rLN d LL�.�COu C. Q U A 4'd0 3 N d E 0 w H o `o 2 � t..l O LL O 0 6 •1. a � � J » Ll r� y e « w�woa yaR T b E u 1=- . 3 °1N q « N NCI dFy Lyu�.9 .^6 q L NC CH. ^E O,dO cL J Yd6 Nw c L 2L 06dt �'�t•�Uy.�yL Xt 6 u L 4 = 3 � r S� O o • N y 4. q O N N Z tvi y � y y EN p g n O •- qN F- SRS 2=2 y d L.•. c'O z tV Nu g E per•- Y � �E� >. we II G= f C O O O C •- •tiOi� A4. p• New c V UNp +C Y «Y dYNd�O C v u wad J Y »•• O �.� Ga S �OI O O - edy d d NL G 6 1t-N A L G ONMEg- ll� r 6'S alt. 6 Y� y; o Ll 11 E am axi ^• A �a o 44^ Y o - L IrAw � r yOj'^ N o =4 �aNS U N NY � m ^ J A N i! W un 6° �J °o N Z U = C« °ate E < q 6 L 6 n5 %Z !._E .rct C O ua my^ i 6 •N°v adz N u =ar 9 u y T Y y q i 6 a acanna >oi U n ^ ,ryFIN Nu L > A q u� i ipgp= 9 U N N« V i L N Y 0 •r- y. C L ° H ya Y N9 C a oay> •+ 6 i`- L N Q q T 1 "�- a �^ A i aN. ° q O ApE y O wv Tar„ N} ° C � C n ° u Y° � 6 • i C ve c " 1O �vaJ a rnq m� iff •C °ma � A u i A N M y O L « S1^ U n 9 � H O hL� w o Nd� E'oC C .V -4 f, vJww r NuM U Own^ G> N O u C 61 Y NF d � d ogN�A =U _tLC y L u a X Y p O ^~ 3 y y °qY q O N= V y N Y N p A _h 4 Y °« guy xo=, L�O AE�JN NLar Cn yOf�W nL Ow{OaJJN�q C Cl.„�N„�L « « ~ a1 o n Z cot 9 60 A '•. LV Lic^ vH gL Np Odi' � NvxiuL ^ 11 -t1.. �' J' U n cu �.i .vm, ^« �NN R r Q7 v r A 9 d C N • 9 O =� gg p1O p iYy u °. qo E�+�'ait NCQ,C„ A ayU N ^�cNO � da ^a.. a1ip�6F�� a aN tN..0 x0 w 7W �Y.N�C N LC OI ^Q V,��i N�tn9 ��ff N�9y. •- c NY.y Jy =� ^ N Wi c 4 AT q >t O .axf a'JA 6� N 7 w� c q w vu •- e1Lau°.0 w Y L U d S N C Qy Y �dodwgv °PYN N am axi ^• A �a o 44^ Y o - L IrAw � r yOj'^ N o =4 �aNS U N NY � m ^ J A N i! W un 6° �J °o N Z U = C« °ate E < q 6 L 6 n5 %Z !._E .rct C O ua my^ i 6 •N°v adz N u =ar 9 u y T Y y q i 6 a acanna >oi U n ^ ,ryFIN Nu L > A q u� i ipgp= 9 U N N« V i L N Y 0 •r- y. C L ° H ya Y N9 C a oay> •+ 6 i`- L N Q q T 1 "�- a �^ A i aN. ° q O ApE y O wv Tar„ N} ° C � C n ° u Y° � 6 • i C ve c " 1O �vaJ a rnq m� iff •C °ma � A u i A N M y O L « S1^ U n 9 � H O hL� w o Nd� E'oC C .V -4 f, vJww C Z d w ^ c A .n ^ � L �o w 6 C v„ N L U Y ^v a n au V l u C Q g N W • n� C° r L 66. N y Z a "eyLaoaa 1Lxm1.°.��Yt � o ^.4ix �N6pvu liurnoa ,�,^c ... O A u Oy N Lai+ m.,u.._ u i m q 9 =^ b 0 W9� n x.N OuLiN O•^ Z. dU wNg0.np «YLD 6'r' C ^ Y F q yN w.c° LA L ^A � c of uz'n °aA.e �' L nd RM Olr^ 01 rm4 'i 0411 N uf yn O� g ccY I._ N P A c NL >9u "o^ « Y A C Z O Y y C t A = U�9 A AIIL. -o n i C N N O N a ooT- c> N A v van�vaul°n H+=+Y n C A V- alyw y Y C u SC j R 'ORN�4 C U < o m o g y 0166 �G .r0 y1< 014'.00 V NW � L V N O C L C tlungOM V Dyl I=IIUU >'oy o H C M F.i ^d °v o r ^ULdan OY 1. GEVO w O.N C � ZEN A .-. 1^q E ♦�'3 A.N d p0 Nog« N q o L�O U C� O ni 6 Y Ou^ a 9 60 A '•. aN .N c�grna�.0 L tu4 *'« v�Va v L T_ $o w , ca N «� ^udN I n •- iao = iiY ^ La OOIL�cUn N A. N � U y 6yL1� N L ^m o� g a N C «f'.vAm NC�yLU D^ n3 o. C� `�a v a N^ Nv AO ApYTao nN avA uAi ^m aiin �dodwgv °PYN dva.m '� =o'�� : a L a ° °rcgal a.vv4 c v>Ai = 6 cu QO O^ W ^ ° q o i ° •s I Gcr' W N O w• 6 u W +• •� s d° Q L N +°. d inn 6 C Z d w ^ c A .n ^ � L �o w 6 C v„ N L U Y ^v a n au V l u C Q g N W • n� C° r L 66. N y Z a "eyLaoaa 1Lxm1.°.��Yt � o ^.4ix �N6pvu liurnoa ,�,^c ... O A u Oy N Lai+ m.,u.._ u i m q 9 =^ b 0 W9� n x.N OuLiN O•^ Z. dU wNg0.np «YLD 6'r' C ^ Y F q yN w.c° LA L ^A � c of uz'n °aA.e �' L nd RM Olr^ 01 rm4 'i 0411 N uf yn O� g ccY I._ N P A c NL >9u "o^ « Y A C Z O Y y C t A = U�9 A AIIL. -o n i C N N O N a ooT- c> N A v van�vaul°n H+=+Y n C A V- alyw y Y C u SC j R 'ORN�4 C U < o m o g y 0166 �G .r0 y1< 014'.00 V NW � L V N O C L C tlungOM V Dyl I=IIUU >'oy o H C M F.i ^d °v o ..I Z U QJ Q d � - 1 aoi..i. a� u ^ a� et LmpN�TAO rt rnd e.'Lm ,°; as � � ax ° �o atmc�• "o auNaJ > Y cu.°6 -"�" >Q rti• .rN d nco. B L Np° «I W D4 �� a�M�.A •-Ard•.^ -a d asp H z. ~�MUV q E C °PL Ody. OrH _ LZ ^O K ° H A GN cy., O COaOr oNNd �v. I0I..0o �� q G r OH t d '.• !•H cd q W siL d °q d � o br'^II MST. O'H^ C A d� 3L r° d N H. 7a dW NH S t q r T N .. C ^WY^ c m N ^ia?L .-u H7 rn u^ qN� n° v= nNOa+ -. nyaq ya «ox , ^ Ny_ - Orq L yl� { HQ L .r4V 9t `< NCO d.N H ~ �`^ 6dld N C Nd L�a00y�y WU �Ifr V4 _ H.0 60 $.�-` 1•.r L O 'JE'J H9 U C d S L Or U.Od€G T^ p0 m• eJ C C H NCL b y„d O ^qr,i NO.O tt C.H d °MLOH 'Y y c w A �OYra U OYN NHS CND Euli NO yam^ ON O k Jdd•4N y0 A d p KNi dd9y- H ^�TC>�3y C °yCjG Nb .dCy N o dy dp E .H Ord t L+-� qH 4 qV�d (�� O yL HddCA� O> yr _ Y[MC 4. NrY I•. NL ° 1H Ilb 'N a' d b O n C N H N M HBO L� A N C •.e CLq ^ieI �d =N E A S`S V M A dNUCOd d�A O O.0 O mw T dT3ulT U L O O N 9AO,oJ H N�A Guq E�L L+L CHL «NH ediLM N 6`OL• d L Garin .�..1 JTi titfOLY ^ UN .-C OdARN N UN < ^^ <N '^F.NO 1-Nr 6NU ^�OrY OrAN6`D <AT rJQ °. <U Y.O. • ti ocu aka ue c nd �d cOr Lm oc rn� ea __ ^+pT��� A I on y^ C •N�'N atd,�ay N L^ F '. M° d CM oA NO b u Y o.On 6 e".9- E • �^. •°Y ��bi by C M 2 vco YrE °aa C �C„mdC dq 'Ta d r^- a N A dT�H Y LT.0 -dp d.+.°J°.gi �> 6UO V ^E ^ y. i= Y �� 'H^ PU NN q N A6y V T° O YYEE N w q�xU O C d C OC = LsL ^ Y C^ q 9` � d r F C Nd q 7 O q 'o, 6 u d 6 -1 y y 2 N�W 99 N� N pq rLOp C L C «n �•NLH +A`Q H L 9 3 qA R i YrNN i T ^. 3yC, a• 9 .� q'u N. "L.0 gc�oo Us Ldaa' oy °ti 'a Eu d > dgxL UN 6LO c� NON 9Jd.OM E- Hq Ry 01H° ^UO• . y`rQ d � ^. CHA A9a 'd b GC uUmA dt 'OFL ALadtd wdn.�Ad .aew -dE� EE r�AMY L @@ Lgru nTRN u .°.�°' ypu N9 �W .A�j Arn4' Jno �C �'se c nNo u.0 < A c °^ bat..o yc wnw o am C.°-H U rm "T id° rOpEU4 Mo «' vA row,•, Y c Ad ^ E 6uN0 E^ t 9 H ^u >Vd.° --. Gy �+ uL� w+ d HL :z �V -Prl°i 4RK bn q •�.4'°l^ xuYi .H. Vqo� NH O. nd i. >t 'O 1pi TEL fUI U.�•'dL 6A`m .a <OrH/r /dnvdi cC9 ( rC-q QpP .0 •�rr6N tLL >2MNUYd. � l 4 A A p d.~O� CA GA C.^ -duGq O�ua L:G • c� .E ~C 4' R W °Q OOU7 � O uW OY y C � m.Z tdiu VNCAN LG•^G Ny u yQ .G . . T.:: LU Jd �n7 O�Et�.Y uOCN Uyan dG NA 6�OL ,-:E dcmW `. i •O� dOa �S3 O. tlilY � N«-C W _ C•+�i•�L.6 a+a+ roN � •tJ •r Z ^ E4u. 4C° Arni � ?O � u�M�OQ1 » x �n4d wEq�y u p�NUp OddN W d m w C4 �i U n 4a% tit�{i. C.• w°t. O ^L•L ,u OV !� vaT.2"Cy' MLGO A °pN S�Y 4°.CLV yN�NE M yuLL � uc T .m 4y. EC 0. °° tw A � v v J N v a. ° 7s y.!: as •- � .° � °ro' z o n z° rq w u c i ^roELC Aow i tlLi E °ru jup c .'..i° a a Ty wand ^Raw Epb ° �L° d mY .c. CGS Q » A t C Ngjd,r 0. � T .dL nV�r. 'O dLI.W «„Cr u G b aPyC0. rL a y� -55. t V q fO3 w Q D U Y O,�V..d9w°- � 2... ^aa ».O'^ 4 Y•[O `N H �LaV A•W�w CEE T.iIY N pN d0 <dN °r ��^ »inVFV m.a mt Awu» HE �V NY4 � E4 Oa+dnu L �� �bb 9. YQ 6+r. S4LLN6 r.Nm � Y- ti°.�WL A3p.JOifivl 4�NYd.4 N N O.Oa I •.. w S ^ 9 ^�a gG� Q6 TU TV No d� .dGO �la°i Y AY y C »adi L 4 L w 0.GgM 6O u G Lug A L U Q 0. n m q= q n L r Y. O� � C m O C b C u L' in �On U '� u 2II 0. a L M n •� C 1EE. •e ro 0 u i O 9 .r°- N y H+ a 71 nr '•'� d4A YSL � +n e~-G. LL TaT� „G_ •"_ y�9 2 g G L .54 C la V Y N a �iq z a Y LOC .nc... Or =� a C acv ue w QaALi • gauro y cA dym 6 � aL —c . E» WY.dN Li OV EN ro 4 Y �� O. N LNm«U+ 9 O.r Ci Lu G A rte. wb LN `ate 'O � y Q Z6Y q' L u dY yN E u....._ L V 6y d rx ° a aaa c. ao ca .�u vi _ _ Qv'v »N a =y n9 d�A y . �� c••nm O Y _O E� _.b Oi �.a N r G• Yln lIL _d6 »N p L"' p w Od a B Y �uOU Wu p r..unL 4a1 ..� u Q aY c »Y vLjG _N Nd qw L d�•hW WG 4 rFG r aa.ec6� L� NYO Yy C »ni CJy »Q LLagO NA .��. N�^�h GO.(1 rr°ur 0y Ay qT� 6W Gd A C� O ^N 01 L°cOJy U� U °J �Oq+ +^ yy.G.. W d» N W d a w t �ti. u Q r N 4 c = pM L w�A� w Ory `Y r 0�4 0 }4 z} Ir+ND Yw MtN ..G-. 57r .JLE� 6 ..GG f�b^='a. r 41�� GV�dii� U Wk WEk fttil MnU O � l 4 O !V N .ry i d r`o0 R �C�aa •pyi Mtl d Y � L A p y C y0 0 "^ a R t'4a RqE gYA-� V O • dY� L > ti C Q 4 N >.a mwS Gy 3-1 CC o•= 4.Im A b tl a »b w G L ~4� IIl W"�1D t y L R PD da aA^ > C 6 O r d fY�`NR �yac�i tlb�M Ol w w R N L n� uoo ^a9 P�4 A W N w V N L Q w N o N P-0 V •.. y gA7�YC G A.�NR4R w• q L~ G P. W K0�4Q OtA y�u _R W L � dy0 Ky atrrA " 0 O P O.R ^dFir E w tl�k r�HA U �C r c'b m b aribCL q'i1t i+ O qrW A O Cf z c i) q `a bury Y C L C C ay o 0 0 M y V EO Y 4 Cw Y. 4tiv s O N R R E N � .O✓ �D � u N � a U O N( 0 K C � C a P> R C� w L b Yg w a' U Cw Q j � P V w q.i 'O M1 N.r c a y.o d w Q Q b tl a� Ic Ldy > a rp r y h L e79 C` c � N j k R PQ� Qv WT eEx ++ y G V .b. YNa Cp- V = L y o w ay a L L m 1 N eyi w C N ^ N ° 4 G q V O tl 4. UA a b E W i LC L� i q C q C b L.C.x L NCO 5 tl 5 L Pugt d v C z'O Y a V F A w. oq ~nQ G�uw E 4. ArtlN� N My csia» v tl.. ,•b,yg` R ` d w a• O � L C tl� C�qL q tla daor a �w Nco a+o Gc u N V4V1� -22 b Y a� 3�q G u a C c-0 Xa i Q N tl ^vim OY y 'C 66A A L 'CG p.A u' n y pyWY. » �Q OS"ytl Y.ONC wt } O oy e Yub4L 4 R p b C CbN C�V 1'y r O L tl e N o G Q V d EueAq 4Y Y E T m.. �yq C M.- €pga =r Y C N L O 4 yw� fG. L y m R qna 2 Qr e v b a 4 v vc� pwRPr 0 M LrV. v 9 L a C YJ ^ d c V; L Y� 0+4t, �`aRCiO L yAw R V art A V 2 •C C+tl` VY„Y� e C 4W L N V Y oabiE L y q,a qON aN� C A4 06+N+E�lO. L G V Yw aA C YO �^ o Y > 6 5S. w"o Y C H M q pF� r�Ntl •- v u x wy N qT N 0 4 O L tl�0 OuO' pLU 4 Lw ri rj- E �b m bC k C Y m' •+L �u^ � W Y RNL ,Y MN YR L a R • N � ..C. w T .M R bN O CO 9Y �t >ls�V AL w P y- om Ly xpmp a'`t PM air aw"Qe Nip 4 WNy WrVU Ord t'�Ja d2 4+=-� 40 b u •i c i) q `a bury Y C L C C ay o 0 0 M y V EO Y 4 Cw Y. 4tiv s O N R R E N � .O✓ �D � u N � a U O N( 0 K C � C a P> R C� w L b Yg w a' U Cw Q j � P V w q.i 'O M1 N.r c a y.o d w Q Q b tl a� Ic Ldy > a rp r y h L e79 C` c � N j k R PQ� Qv WT eEx ++ y G V .b. YNa Cp- V = L y o w ay a L L m 1 N eyi w C N ^ N ° 4 G q V O tl 4. UA a b E W i LC L� i q C q C b L.C.x L NCO 5 tl 5 L Pugt d v C z'O Y a V F A w. oq ~nQ G�uw E 4. ArtlN� N My csia» v tl.. ,•b,yg` R ` d w a• O � L C tl� C�qL q tla daor a �w Nco a+o Gc u N V4V1� -22 b Y a� 3�q G u a C c-0 Xa i Q N tl ^vim OY y 'C 66A A L 'CG p.A u' n y pyWY. » �Q OS"ytl Y.ONC wt } O oy e Yub4L 4 R p b C CbN C�V 1'y r O L tl e N o G Q V d EueAq 4Y Y E T m.. �yq C M.- €pga =r Y C N L O 4 yw� fG. L y m R qna 2 Qr e v b a 4 v vc� pwRPr 0 M LrV. v 9 L a C YJ ^ d c V; L Y� 0+4t, �`aRCiO L yAw R V art A V 2 •C C+tl` VY„Y� e C 4W L N V Y oabiE L y q,a qON aN� C A4 06+N+E�lO. L G V Yw aA C YO �^ o Y > 6 5S. w"o Y C H M q pF� r�Ntl •- v u x wy N qT N 0 4 O L tl�0 OuO' pLU 4 Lw ri rj- E dm 4 N Y g L O�U YyA Y Q • � y V n0.60 V.L � � = � y Ldt L i Y V Y � 40aa� � 4 „ W U yF jS W; y s 40. L T. 9 c ^ O V w w QOO O y L + N u�R a C= in n C yY � p0 >Lwu .R, �' Mm$u i� a� m� aEmiansM �� xp ••- xy yir .F1u cad Qi .i mCr^NY 6.m-q 60c0 CL 0�4 �m .ACC ^ GU OT� Y YYD•... ° iN LT cYP9j w d O�W qM pCY°y L6�C1 v.u� ayy :5 'R V+� U� aC Y Y I I N til IN Ui �.NC amL..O gaOV 1a L L • C ° y 0 N' 7 01 m T ~ d c V C Y i U G O v Al 2 ^ Y a c ii E s0 Yq U mu^YL q.� m ^W N6 l.fy Oy COd rm ; L YvaY Nu vc y�i'c�.Ai •-•� y `.'.� oN" �' yN dm 4 y ' U " c L � y Vu CN It ✓ A A� s_ „ W U T 6� O• 'O Y C m E - O y 0 0 Y L6 YA yY � p0 m � E ••- xy yir .F1u cad o' O rno o ^ v y N y CEV^vOi Em C} 0 I I N til IN -23 O L N Y M y Y�it L � T O i : ax'. z'o• � 9 L t C �yE Ta G u ^ L rl G d V N O t y r 6 L L U V 9 1 t � O C Y 0 O ��d Y O q4 L 4 Y M nO+aC Y y a L ^� E aNV O V .ry Q. O� 1 O p g c T Y •o• _ = Y v. y u.Ti v o ° Y A u q L L° 3 L= N L Y V �• On S � F Y• � N Y 6 7 E A i Y 9• •N^ N r N ° Ta aM L 3y�y� oLY 3" uc LL a Et M.L a+ r C6G ^',O Y ^ Gn ALY V y. N L c w A pP C NY9 Yy AE N C` ^ O L m A aF aNY c L L ; Ya+ �a E` Ld ypNL a V o o2! o a d i E i La NACii v � Go g N d? v d d Z U i q L n 2 dad t E It nrn c C� N •^ua N r VaA aTi Ou. a_Ea� A.AC. Lv6 ioE . Lr C N W" iU L� a F-9 v 1-Y-� Q� CN JEd N� •.- Ly LY 6H G I I I ~I • ;�'• LLB' u AE c•u- °c A „ '�yAe N' O O1 ` 07 � � at.. y O yO Y V G OU PD EE .�4.p jt+r 41 i •.t dY ,�L O -E •C „i Z OyC P O d6 6V L L= > •y 1� � n w O y �� V C S•r � a� c c� <• . � Y Y G 9� O AC •Y L M N LU W L aY C dO O N A L C cm o u w T° � L L �” C u = ✓E aLi rNM w s '°v ai Z U ny rc a ]cui. �X�Y`Y 'S^c mu� � Lv • a m o^L Gm E� c^ LAt'a+ a >L° 8-41 �« oo ° uA sm O� 1 O p g c T Y •o• _ = Y v. y u.Ti v o ° Y A u q L L° 3 L= N L Y V �• On S � F Y• � N Y 6 7 E A i Y 9• •N^ N r N ° Ta aM L 3y�y� oLY 3" uc LL a Et M.L a+ r C6G ^',O Y ^ Gn ALY V y. N L c w A pP C NY9 Yy AE N C` ^ O L m A aF aNY c L L ; Ya+ �a E` Ld ypNL a V o o2! o a d i E i La NACii v � Go g N d? v d d Z U i q L n 2 dad t E It nrn c C� N •^ua N r VaA aTi Ou. a_Ea� A.AC. Lv6 ioE . Lr C N W" iU L� a F-9 v 1-Y-� Q� CN JEd N� •.- Ly LY 6H G I I I ~I COCOZON,GA CI'I`� Qr r. F -y o "r 1986 Commission Sane 11, the planning DATE: Members of r Chairman and Planner 1 T0: Buller, City t Brad tP ? lanner CODE PMENDMEN d FROM: Associa D OEyE�OPMENt osa to amen Bruce Cooks ME _ A prop of the ASSESSMENT N A T m Ran h se Cucamonga, BY : L Of R CNO - EN`�IRONMENI3 �,�r� pertathe City SuBaECT 04 u'Y �ect'o� Code of Developmen 211. model home sales Ordinance t that are requires that homes endment ,on 17.04.070^ " same tract ante the7t Tht ordin. sales Section Within t or lease. model Name performance AgSTR'C locate ren , f site Nse it. I� o eyed for le,• of _ Permit- insure that ices sa 'o m the Conditional included model home being it the establ have been of qff "thee ding Would Pew the granting ditions mert to Surroun ,- a and fated W m nime, dtW ttshresppct acts as d be station Build the imp es wool or 00 year, C amending complex nei9hb of this consider model home established April t of A r�Zi23, 1986, the fission Back in C,t blishmen II. 3A 0 -"that the Perm" the es Commisstion of this a,�iendmen r P veques t (;qae A ahe planning forward With pevelooffices.ected staff to move ales of ion directed Abition ;;ocnmiss 's ro ostab ment Code c lis del ANA�VSIS: the Develop is to Protect With mo III. The intent ``f, offices associated ,a noise, home sales fd traTfac� peocr t"ria be t A, Gene�S�t-e- model increased to that reques ne -f ghbor,es offic offices lre Commission st�Pul d evaluate each achieve sa',es Theate these impacts a�an9aage use home etc }. SPer is litter shed to m�togdit-tons, estabh on site can basted up ,ncluGe: the ibove PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development rode Amendment 25 -02 June 11, 1986 Page 2 r, 1. Tnat impacts from increased traffic are minimized by requiring that model home sales offices be Located adjacent to the primary circulation route Concurrent with as application for the Conditional Use Permit, a traffic study is required Po analyze the traffic impacts for the p-roject and what mitigaf 'on measures, if any, would be required. 2. That impacts from increased parking demands a- minimized by requiring that sufficient off- street parking be available. 3. That the model home sales office only be located within a room of the house, or the garage, ''1t not in any trailer, mpdular, or any other simi type of temporary building. 4, That the hours of operation be limited to between '0:00 a.m. and 6 :00 p.m. 5. That low level lighting be provided to ensure a safe and secure environment, but designed such that it is not a nuisance for adjacent properties. 6. That the model home sales office be of a shore, -term, tempo-ary nature by l miting the Cond - -bona Use Permit to one - year, with a maximum of a one -year extension. B. Environmental Assessment: Part II of an Initial Study has been comp etc: '•y sue;ta 'f has ascertained that no significant adverse •a.racts•would occur as a result of this project and has recommended issuance of a Negative declaration. IV, CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing item in The Daily Report newspaper. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: For the Planning Commission to recommend adoption of this Development Code Amendment, it must be determined that it is consistent with the General Plan and that this text amendment would not result in any significant adverse impacts or be detrimental to surrounding properties, The Commission should also find that with this Development Code Amendment as drafted, existing development would be protected fi rr. any "nuisance" factors associated with the establishment oz an off -site model home sales office. 01-2, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Code Amendment 86 -02 June 11, 2986 Page 3 VI. RECOMMENDATION - The Planning Gommission should consider all materia I an input. If the Commission, concurs with the Facts for Findings, then approval of the attached Resolution recommending City Council adoption of Development Code Amendment 86 -02, and issuance of a Negative Declaration, would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller - City Planner BB:BC:cv Attachments: Planning Commission Minutes - April "3, 1936 j Resolution of Approval with attache, Ordinance 2 C-3 It was the consensus of the planning Commission that Preliminary Review 86 -26, Carlton Browne Company, was consistent with the Interim Foothill Boulevard Policies and the project could continue through processing. 9;35 p<m. - Planning Commission Recessed 9.50 p.m. - Planning Commission Reconvened Chairman $tout announced that item C would now be considered. C. ENVIRDA,NENTAL A5T SESSM5,,1j AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13114 SCHULTZ Commissioner Rempel advised that he had made telephone contact with the applicant who consented to a two week continuance. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Mci;fei, unanimously carried, to continue the public hearing for EpvironmentaI Assessment and TentatiyP Tract 13114 Schultz, to the May 14, 1986 Planning Commmission meeting. DIRECTOR'S REPORT I � L. REVISION TO SECTION 17.04.070(d) OF DwVELOPiiENT CODE - MODEL HOMES SALES ; OFFICE Dian Coleman, Senior planner, reviewed the staff report. Jerry Linton, Citation Builders, gave an overview of his request for the Commission's consideration of this amendment. He advised that he would be willing to work with staff to come up with something which works. There were no further comments. Commissioner Chitiea was concerned that the amount of traffic could be increased substantially Through the existing neighborhood. Commissioner Mcriel agreed there might be some increased traffic but it would not be that substantial. He thought the Conditional U.a, Permit method was appropriate, and wanted to insure that trailers will not be permitted as a part of his request. Commissioner Rempel agreed and stated the Conditional Use Permit could take care of the traffic problem. He pointed out that model units are normally at the main entry of a development; therefore, traffic into the rest of development would be minimal. Planning Commission Minutes April 23, 196 is 0--A/ Chairman Stout agreed with the Conditional Use Permit concept. He suggested that the Code language should be tightly drafted as to specifically w' _ a -. Conditional Use aermit is appropriate and where it is not, address traffic impacts, and limitations. Commissioner Rempel stated that if the model homes are located on a collector street there would not be much of a problem, but on a small residentW street where traffic would have to go a distance into a development, there could be a problem. Commissioner Chitiea suggested that time limitations be established. Brad Buller, City Planner, advised that staff would try to expedite this amendment; however, felt the criteria the Commission is looking for would take some study and consideration. He suggested that staff bring proposed language before th�,- residential Design Review Ccmmittee before it comes to the full Plannirj Commission. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that staff move forward with the amendment to the Development Code. M. VICTORIA GROVES PARK CONCEPT Bill Holley, Community Services Director, gave an introduction to the park concept. He explained that development of this park would necessitate the removal of trees on the site, thereform, the staff had prepared an extensive presentation. Dave Leonard, park Froject Coordinator, gave an overview of the Conceptual Design Plan and presented slides of the site. Commissioner Mci..el was concerned with parking. He stated that Windrow Park seems underparked and recent ballgames there have created congestion with the adjacent model homes. Mr. Holley explained that this situation is due to the fact that the Community Parks are now under construction, which has displaced some programs. He stated that rather than cancel these programs, City staff had looked to some Neighborhood Parks. He advised that the Neighborhood Parks are not designed or intended for Community Park purposes and will return to their intended uses after duly of this year. Commissioner McNi -1 asked how many parking spaces are being provided? Mr. Leonard advised that there are 26 parking spaces on the site, plus the use of additional parking on the school site. Planning Commission 14',-ites -16- April 23, 1486 ( '.:3 1�1 RESOLUTION NO', A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCH CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 86- 02, AM dING SECTION 1.7.04.070 PERTAINING TO TEMPORARY USES 0� THE DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ORDINANCE 211. WHEREAS, on the 11th day of June, 1986, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant tc, Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission Finds it necessary to revise the Development Code requirements pertaining to temporary uses. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following ink ink 1. That the knendment is warranted to permit the establishment of off -site modei home sales offices when it can be demonstrated 'that the said use is designed to result 'in minimal impact to existing surrounding development. 2. That the proposed Develophziit Code k.andment would not have significant impact on the environment; and 3. That the proposed Development Code Amendment is in conformance with the goals and policies of the General Plan„ SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucarmonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on June 11, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Covernment Cade, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval the 11th day of June, 1986, Development. Code Amendment 86 -02 amending Section 17.04.070 contained in the attached Ordinance. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 1171' GAY OF JUNE, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C`6 PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION DCA 86 -02 Page 2 Yennis L. Stout, airman ATTEST: Br Bu t ? puty Si retary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly iniroducea, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of June, 1986. by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COWISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EM C-9 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMNGA, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO C?GA.MONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO nw!►fiSE SECTION 17,04.070 - TEMPORARY USES WHEREAS, the -, .ity Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: follow +g: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the I A. That the planning Commissiu^ e° Cie City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public nearing 'geld in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends 'the j Amendment to Section 171`4.070 " Temporary Uses ", of the Development Code u- r.e,�einafter described and ` this City Council has held a g public hearing k " prescribed by law and -duly heard and considered said recommendation. I B. That this Development Code Amendment is consistent with the General Plan cf the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this Ai-.ndment is consistent with the GbJcctives of the Development Code. O. That this Amendment to the Development Code gill have nc signif Ant environmental impact as provi��d in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: That Section 17.04.070 "Temporary Uses" is hereby amended to rea as ollows Section 17.04.070 -C to read as follows; 7. Model Homes. Model homes may be used as offices so elt y far the first sale of homes within a recorded tract subject to the following conditions: (a) The sales office may be located in a garage, trailer r, dwelling. W 0— CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE DCA 86 -02 Page 2 W3 (b) Approval shall be for a two -year period, at which time the sales office use strall be terminated and the structure restored back to its orignal condition. Extensions may be granted by the -1!ity Planner in one year increments up to , ,aaximum of four (4) years or until ninety (SO) percent of the development is sold; whichever is less. (c) A cash deposit, letter of credit, or any security determined satis-�actory to the City shall be submitted to the City of Rancho "ucamonga, in an amount to be set by Council Resolution, to ensure the restoration or removal of the structure, (d) The sales office 4:.- to be used 90y for transactions involving Vie sale, rent, or lease of lots and /or structures is only to be located either within the tract in which the sales office is located, contiguous tracts, or a planned community. However, the Planning Commission may consider ,off -site model home sales offices subject to the grapt:ing of a Conditional use Permit (See Section 17,04.070. - C -8). (e) Failure to I.erminate sales office and restore structure or failure to,ipply for an extension on or before the expiraiaon date will result in forfeiture of the cash deposit, a halt in further construction or inspection activity on the provect site, and enforcement ante -: , ensure restoration of structure. (f) Street improvements and temporary otr- street parkioy; at a rate of two (2) spaces per model shall be completed to the satisfaction of the ,ity Engineer and City Planner prior to commencP -int of sales activities or the display of model homes. (g) All fences proposed in conjunction with the model homes and sales office shall be located outside of the public right -of -way. h) Flags, pennants, or other on -site advertising shall be regulated pursuant to the Sign Regulations of the Municipal Code. CITY COUNCIL ORDI/ ANCE DCA 86 -02 Page 3 M Use of signs shall ;require submission of a o si permit application` for review and a g the Planning Division prior, to "nstallatior, by 8. Off -Site Hodel Homes. A model hmme sales office, when ' not""— Tgca�— within o =e of the three circumstances identified in Section 17.04.070,C- 7(d), is to be considered as an off -site model home sales office. Off -site model home sales offices may only be permitted subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission as perscribed in Section 17 .04.030, and in conformance with the following criteria. (a) A sales Office within the model home complex may only 1a located within the dwelling itself, or wi tit'. �f the garage. Trailers, modul ars, or any similar teimporery structure, shall not be permitted. (b) A cash dQposit, the amount to be determined by the City Planner, will be required upon issuance of the Conditional Use Permit to insure restoration of the mGdcl home sales office to its intended ultimate configuration. (c) Off- stftat parking within a paved lot or by some other means a;;crptable to the City Planner sh411 be provid°d a« the ratio of 2 spaces for every model home and shall be located within the limits of the model home sales office. The provislon of off -street parking is a necessary prerequisite for the granting of this permit, and its deveiupment shalt be completed prior to the cemmencement of activities of display of mcdei homes. (d) The hours of operation that the .fodel home sales office way be opened to the public for business shall be limited to between the hours Of 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. (e) All fences proposed in conjunction with the model home sales office shall be located outside of the public right -of -way. (f) Adequate on -site lighting shall be provided to insure a safe and secure environment, while at the same time being designed and placed in such a manner as to prevent stray light or glare from becoming a nuisance factor for adjacent (2--/o CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE DCA 85 -02 Page 4 properties. Thai lighting design emplq.-ed should be of a low -level type of system, i.e., Malibu style lighting. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to the commencement Of activities or display of model hones. (g) The approval of this permit shall be far a one year,neriod,. ;Et which time the model home /sales Office_,_ use shall be terminated and the structure(s) restored back to its (their; original condition. Time extensions may be granted by the Planning Commission up to a maximum of one -year, or until 90% of the development is sold, whichever is less. Request for time extensions must be received by the Planning Division at least 30 days prior to the date of expiration. Any requests for extension of this Conditional Use Permit beyond the tdo years would require the application of a new Conditional Use Permit. Irrespective of the above, any model home sales office in existence as a: combination of as first an on- site use, than as an off -site use, shall be in existence an aggregate total time not to exceed three years. (h) Before approving a Conditional use Permit, the Planning Commission shall make the necessary mandatory findings as prescribed in Section 17.04.030 -E, plus the following additional findings: I. 7nat the model home sales office is compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and neighborhood, and that its location will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare, or result is any significant adverse impacts for any residents within the surrounding established neighborhood. 2. That the location of the model home sales office is ad3acent to a primary circulation route (collector, secondary, or arterial) so that any additional traffic generated as a result of this project will not have any significant impact for the surrounding develupment. To insure that any traffic impacts associated with the establishment ..o CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE DCA 86 -02 Page 5 of a model how sales office are minimized, it will be required that concurrent with any application for a Conditioanl Use Permit for an off -site model home sates office, that the applicant will also include a traffic study to be prepared by a certified traffic angineer detailing all potential traffic impacts expected to result from the project, and proposing any required mitigation measures that would be necessary to reduce any traffic impacts to the surrounding established neighborhood. 3. That sufficient on -site, tiff- street`parkincg is available so that any additional parking demand generated as a result i`of this project would not have any significant adverse impacts for the surrounding development, 4. That the individual elements of the model hones sales office, i.e., lighting, signing, fencing, hours of opera;,ion, are , designed in a collective, coordinates manner to ensure a safe, seem *.e, and aesthetic environment, sensitive to and compatible with the surrounding development. 5. Thai: the model home sales office is to be of a temporary, short -term nature;. short term is defined as having a life expectancy not to exceed two years. 9. TI —Ater coaches or mobile homes on active construction sites liar use as a temporary living quarters for security personnel, or temporary residence of the subject property owner. The following restrictions shall apply: El (.a) The City Planner may approve a temporary trailer for the duration of the construction project or for a specified period, but in no event for more tNan two (2) years. If exceptional circumstances ex.isi-, a one (1) year extension may be granted, provides! that the building permit for the first permanent dwelling or structure on the same site has also been extended. (b) Installation of trailer coaches may occur only after a valid building permit has been issued by the City Building and Safety Division. CITY COU4C1L ORDIHAt10E DCA 86 -OZ Page 6 (e) Trailer coaches permitted pursuant to this section shall not exceed a maximum gross square footage of six hundred fifty (650) square feet in size (tongue not included). (d) The trailer coach, ;must have a!, valid California vehicle license any shall provide evidence of State Division of Hwising unproval as prescribed in the Ideal th and Safety Code of the State of California. A recreational vehicle being defined as a motorhome, travel trailer, truck camper or camping trailer, with or without motor power, shall not be permitted pursuant to this section. (e) The temporary trailer coach installation must meet all requirements and regulations of the County Department of Environmental Health Services and the City Building and Safety Division. (f) Any permit issued pursuant to this section in conjunction Pith a construction project shall become invalid upen cancellation or completion of the building permit for which this use has been approved, or the expiration of the time for which the approval has been granted. 10. Other uses and activities similar to the above as deemed appropriate by the City Planner. At that time, trailers shall be removed from the site. 11. Temporary Office Modules. The use of temporary structures, suc as tray ers or pre - fabricated structures for use as interim offices, may be considered in any district subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit and the regulations stated with Sectin 17.10.10 -F -4. Ell 0--/3 KI KI CITTI OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 11, 1986 GAO f `3CA .0M0y r f n r 1 r 2 O O F� $ U > TO: Chairman and ;Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra MeiAr, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' AND CONDITIONAL USE QEP.MIT 86 -08 - ALHAM R R ROGRAPHI�S - The establis }iment of a blueprint company in an existing building with a lease space of 2,184 square feet on 0.960 acres of land in the General Industrial /trail Served District (Subarea 2) located at 8755 Flower Road. APN: 209 -013 -042. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning• North Industrial Park; Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 2 South - Vacant Land; Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 2 East - Vacant Land; Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 2 West - Vacant Land, Industrial Park; Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 2 • C. General Plan Desi nations: roject ite - General Industrial /Rail Served North - General Industrial /Rail Served South - General Industrial /Rail Served East - General Industrial /Rail Served West - General. Industrial /Rail Served D. Site Characteristics: The applicant proposes to locate in an established industrial complex that has a total of 58,826 square feet of building space on 2.194 acres of land. E. Applicable Regulations: A blueprint shop ~s classified as a "business support service" which is a conditionally permitted use in Subarea 2. ITEM D 1977 PLANNING CUMM,s,SSION STAFF REPORT June 11, ;Qwr CUP 86 -08 - `lhal'eera Reprographics Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: 11 A. General: The existing industrial complex was approved by Director Review 80 -10 and developed per applicable conditions of approval. The applicant will be occupying a portion of the building on Parcel 7 of Parcel Map 6005 (see Exhibit "B "'). The parcel has an existing parking ratio oi:l stall per 435 square feet of building space which would allow the blueprint company to E, ilize five parking spaces. The proposed °,r}and Blueprint will conduct business from 8:15 a.m, to 5 :00 P.M. Monday through Friday and will be staffed by 2 employees. The applicant indicates that he would like to put to profitable use a building which he presently owns. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff conducted the Environmental Checklist and determined that the blueprint process could create an objectionable odor from the use of ammonia. However, the operation of this business will be subject to compliance with Class 8 performance standards. The Class B standards are so designed to procect uses on adjoining sites from effects which could adversely affect their functional and economic viability. In particular, all uses shall be operated so as not to emit matter causing unpleasant odors which are perceptible to the average person beyond any lot line of the lot containing auch uses.. Staff has found no other adverse environmental impacts. If the V tinning Commission concurs with these findings issuance fir' a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of toe Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located as evidenced by the Conditional Use Permit provision for Business Support Services in ths. Subarea. 2. That the proposad use will not be detrimental to the Public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. � 1-] PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 11, 1986 CUP 86-08 - Alhambra Reprographics Page 3 IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Re'port newspaper, the property posted and notices sent t T� 1 t 0 property o a property owners within 300 feet of thul project. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue i7—Nerat7i've Declaration and approve Conditional Use Permit 86- 08, through the adoption of the attachea Resolution. Aesp fu rad Butler City Planner BB:DM:nas Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "All - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Resolution P-3 i` AlhambrU - Reprograp , cs Z9 -4455 283 -0974 Inc. March 5. 15'Br City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road -- Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 92390 This letter is being submitted to satisfy Seotion B Number 3 of the requirements of the aPPlication for a Conditional Use Permit. J Proposed Use: Blueprint Company i Roues of Operation: 5:15 a.m- to 5:00 p.rr. Monda4r through Frida4 Numb . of Employees: 2_ Reasons for Reouestirig Conditional Use Permit: to make profitable— use of building already owned - Sincerely Jack Soli President lhj Lam"? 17North IsLStteet,Alhambra,California 91801 Ex 10 sub CIRCULATION _ TRAILS /ROUTES 120' R.O.W. 0000 Padestrian Creeks & Channels 100' R.O.W. 0000 Bicycle ® 88' or less R.O.W. �(�[� Regional Multi -Use , �: ti Paris 1 - RAIL SERVICE -1— }— i--�}- Existing 1r—I Bridge Special Streetscape! f=+ f +i-- Proposed 4`�` Access Points -use Landscaping 0 4E 3' 800' 1600' NORTH CITY OF iTr�i: cy�_og ANY' M CUCA MONGA TI' LE: DNIS -DN EXHIBIT. SCr1L.E. —_ ,9 Alt t-17-H CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 01 rvoRTH Tnu.. .EXHI RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMIS <ON APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86.58'VOR TnLAND BLUEPRINT LOCATED AT 3 755 FLOWER ROAD 1.4 THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN DISTRICT WHEREAS, on tie 14th day of May, 1986, a complete application was filed by Alhambra Reprographics for review of the above - described r -oject; ar;d WHEREAS, on the 11th day of June, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives. -of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not cre -itit,, adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on June 11, 1986. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 86 -08 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if approved use has not commenced within twenty -four (24) months from the date of approval. 2. This approval shall run with the applicant and si,all become null and void upon a charge of ownership or if the business operation ceases., 3. Any modification, expansion or other change in operation will reouire a revision to the Conditional Use Permit. 4. Operation of thl' business shall be subject to compliance with Class B Performance Standards. In particular, all uses shall be operated so as not to emit matter causing unpleasant odors which are perceptible to the average person beyond any lot line of the lot contai -iing such uses. 22-9 PLANNINf COMMISSION RESOLUTION June 11, 1386 CUP 86-08 Alhambra Reprogra,.hics Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY :. DennisC Me ATTEST: rid Buller, eputy ecretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of, the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, do hereby Certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at'j regular meeting of tft, !'Tanning Commission held on the 11t, day of June, 1986,E by the following vote -,•, -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISS10was• ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS- FA EN El iJ 11 ---- — - C17 f 01 kANMO CUCAiI ONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: tune 11, 1986 TO, Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buler, City Planner BY: Otto Kroat 1, Senior Planner z f � U1 1> 1977 ,OBJECT: MODIFICATIONS OP MULTT- FAMILY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - CITY QF R'UrNQ_CuCARINGA - A proposal to am-vid the Development Cade to upgrade apartment deveinpment standards, and to require enclosed garages for all multi- family construction. Other similar modifications .day also be considered. I. 8AC GROUND: At the Mt,y 7 and May 21, 149E meetings, the City Council d scuzsed potential todi•sications to apartm_nt development standards, and requested the Planning Cctm.i•,sian to consider modifications to existing Ordinances, as follows: 1. Bring apartment standards in line with condominium standards (except for subdivison requirements). 2. Consider modifications of parking standards for all muitl- femily units to include requirements for enclosed garages. This report outlines these two reouests separately in the following sections. The Commission is as -.ed to hold a p0lic hearing on these it -= and make itv, repmmn;encations zry the City Council. In addition, the City Council is in the process of discussing minimum dwrlling unit sizes and minlmum lot size requirements. The Commission may be asked to review those issues some time this summer. H. UPGRAD1,NG OF APARTMENT STANDARDS: Tire City Council has expressed t an interest in making apartment standards identical to condominium standards. except for previsions dealing with subdivision of land. With few exceptions, the City's Development Code daes not distinguish ownership and rental units, i.e., condos from apartments. The Development. Code Seals with "multiple family" units regardless of ownership status, howaver, there are some differences iA the required parking standards, The number of parking spaces for apartment units and townhomes %condos shown on the char} be low: ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF kEPORT Multi - Family Development Standards June 11, 1986 Page 2 CURRENT PAR,CING REQUIREMENTS SPACES PER UNIT Apartments i'owri' fuses /Condos Studio T.3 -'1' 3 —' 1 Bedroom 1.3 1.5 2 Bedroom 1.E 1 <3 3 Bedroom 1.7 2.0 4 Bedroom 1.9 2.0 Visitor 1.0 per 4 DU's 1.0 per 4 OU's Currently, one covered space in a garage .or carport is requii-i for all ,multi- family projects. The differences between the two dwelling types are relatively mind *, with apartments having slightly - less stringent requirements. At the time the standards were developed, the City's r-7ierience with apartments indicated smaller units in gern ra.l, and {3htly lower deiand for parking. However, recent trends in ,lti- family development in Rancho Cucamonga obliterated virtually S differences relative to parking, as apartment projects are built with future conversions in mind, and condominiums are rented out as apartments. This %- -ould seem to indicate that a single set of part ng standards "multi family dwellings" would be ?pprooriate. If the Commission concurs, this would require that Section 17.12.040 of the Development Code be .modified in accordance with Exhibit "A" a,'.-tached fur your consideration. This change would eliminate differences between apartment and condominium standards by increasing parking standards for apartment project*, (However, this change would not affect covered parking requirements, that issue is addressed separately in to following section of this report.) III. MODIFICATIO14S TO COVERED PARKING R'; ttIREMENTS: Currently, one covered parking space per unit `n a garage or carport 1,r required frr Multi-fallily projects. The Counc), has expressed concerns that garages may be preferable to carp:rts for they required covered parking. The main reasons for the chaa -,o- would be to improve aesthetics, public safety, and quality of rasidenti,l projects in g-,ieral . Staff has revii -wed parking standards in the West Valley. The requirements for other cities in tole area are noted below. in addition to open parking, the following covered spaces are required: fe c' PLANNING COMMiSSIUN STAFF REPORT Multi - Family Development :',andards June 11 1586 Page 3 Upland Condos - 2 spaces /unit in a, garage Apartments - most restrictive zone requires 2 spaces /unit in a garage or-carport Chin,,: All multi - family residentia't - 1 space %unit in a garage or carport Ontarir: All multi - family residentia'. - 1 space /unit in garage or carport Montclair: All multi -- family residential - 2 spaces /unit in garage Issues The following isR ^jes have been identified fcr the Comini,sion's di- cussion: 1. Public 'Say -sty. Staff has ,contacted the Sheriff 'S Department relative to the issue of ,jersonal /property safety: for garages as cc,apt.reu to carports in m'11ti- family projects. the Sheriff indicates a slight pi- eference for garages from the public safety Nerspec'aive. However, he also notes that although a locked garage may be more secure than an open carpo�,t, many people may utilize their garages for tether purposes such as storage and continue to park in the open, often in public streets, 2. ruuncticaality_ Garages art,, often used for uther purposes much Ts storage and the cars are parked in front of tha garages, in tae driveway, or an the street. This is particn, "' ly true of smaller units where storage may be inadequate, is may have the effect of actually reducing the number of open spaces - available for open parking. 3. Aesthetics. Enclosed garages can be more aesthetically pleasing than carports, both for how the structure itself appears and for reducing the number of automobiles visible on sight. However, rows of gar ?gee in ; %lti -faro ly developments can also create a negative vi.;ual effect along the circulation corridors of the project. tasign and layout of bout garages and carports needs to be care °'ally revieyed with each project. 4. Cast, The construction of enclosed garages instead of carports r etrp.<_ents an additional cost. The 8IA estimates the builder's casr or the garage. at about $2,350 per space, versus approximately $850 per space for carports. It should be noted that these Figures nary widely depending on design, materials, number of units, topography, and other considerations. C— —"? PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Multi- Family Development Standards June: 11, 1986 Page 4 Alternatives- Alternatives for multi- family parking requirements. include: 1. Current requiremp its remain in place; one covered space in a garage ur carport. 2. Requirement of one space in a garage - remaining spaces may be in a garage or, unco•,ered. 3. Requirement of garages under Optional Standards only; cz -ports would continue to be acceptable under `,asic development standards. Anoth -, option to be considered vloild be to require garages in the lower density multi - family ranc,,,s such as Low Medium and Medium, and to use the existing requii: ments of one covered space in a ' garage or carport for higher density residentials categories such a� Medium High and High. Staff intends to do a brief side presentation to show examples of covered parking at the Commission meeting. IV. SE'r 1ARY /RECOMMENDATIGNS: All of the modifications discussed in This report require public hearings and 4hanges to the Development Coax^. The Commission is requested to review these issues, ail to mu'xe recommc -idati--ns to the City Council on the following items: 1. Modifications of apartment parking standards to be consistent with condominium park;► „. Recommendation: Staff recommends the proposed modifications in accordance with Exhibit "A ". 2. Consideration of covered parking in garages in lieu of carports. - Recommendation: Staff is requesting appropriate direction from the Planning Commission. Given specific direction, staff will prepare appropriate resolutions for the Commission's consent at a future eeting. Res ctfully Acted Brad Buller City Planner BB :OK :ns C, Section 17.12.040 Section 1712.040 Parking Requirements IW The following sections list the required amount tf parking for each category of uses, special requiigments and tptional requirements. A. Residenliai 1. Sj�gle- family detached dwellings (conventional). Two (2) parking spaces �Ithin a garage. 2. -t imter development (condominium, townhome, "e.e.) semi - detached single tiimily (zero lot line, patio homesf, duplexes, etc.) Erid mobile home parks. (a) Studio: 1.3 off- street parking space per unit: of which one space shall be in a garage or carport. (b) One (1) bedroom: 1.5 off- street parking spaces per unit of which one space shall be in a garage or carport. (c) Two (2) bedroomsu 1.8 off - street parkiag spaces per unit of which one space shall be in a q -wage or carport. (d) Three (3) or more bedrooms: Two off - street parking spaces per ta►it of which one space shall be in a garage or carport. (e) In addition to the regv4 -ed number of parking spaces for each unit, r one off- street uncovered parking space shall be provided for each four units for visitor parking. For single family zero lot line, patio homes, and duplexes, on- street parking may be substituted for visitor parking, where sufficient street pavement width and distance between driveways has been provided. (f) For developments containing five or more units, up to thirty -five (35) percent of the required uncovered spaces may be compact car size. (g) The use of carports requires approval from the Design Review Committee. - �rt3a.— (a) Ba clot and one bedroom iwelling unit: 1.3 off Are ling spa ^es for�each dwelling unit t f which one space sh nF a garage or carpe rt or each unit. j (b) Two (2) bedroom dwelling units: 1.i: - street parking spaces for each dwelling urat of whic one spa all be covered for each unit. l (c) Three (3) bedrooms or delILIg units: 1.7 olf- street parking spaces for each dwell* unit of which one space shall be covered for ' each unit, plusrT.f off - street parking spa a cor each bedroom in excess of t ee' {3 }. (d) Ir" dition to required number of parking spaces for each M,'t, one (1) guest parkin space shall be required for l/each four (4)) units:`- DATE: _ TO: FRCM• BY: I SUBJECT: Ell El CITY OF RANCE..0 CUCILMONGA STAFF REPORT June 11, 1986 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Barbara krall, Assistant Civil Engineer Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 9896 - Bixby/Lesson Pomarov Associates - A division of acres of and into 13 parcels within the Industrial Park Development District, Subarea 12, located between 4th and 6th Streets and between Milliken and Pittsburgh Avenues. {APN229- 261- 58 &59} 1. PROJECT AND SIi'E DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel "Map B. Purpose: To divide 35 acres into 13 parcels for the development of i master planned Industrial Center„ Phase I is on to.Aght§ agenda as D.R 86 -09. C. Location: Bet,�jeen Milliken and Pittsburgh Avenues and between 4t;1 and 6th Street:.. D. Parcel Mize: arced - 2.1.acres Parcel 6 - 2.2 acres Parcel 11 - 2.0 acres Parcel 2 - 2.:1 acres Parcel 7 - 2.1 acres Parcel 12 - 2.2 acres Parcel 3 - 2." zones Parcel 3 - 2.6 acres Parcel 13 - 7.7 acres Parcel 4 - 2.2 acres Parcel 9 - 2.4 acres Parcel 5 - 2.;' acres Parcel 10 -2.2 acres E. ExistirqZZon!P2.: Industrial Pork, Specie is Plari. Subarea 12 of the industrial F. Existins Land Use: Vacant G. Surrounding '_aad 'Use: North - Exis£ing Mustrial building Solath - vacant East - vac,3c ; West - vaca+ e ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION: STAPF REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9896 BIXBY /LEASON POMEROY ASSOCIATES June 11, 1986 page 2 '. A K. Surrounding Genera; Plan and Development elopment Code Desi nations: North - General Industrial • buoareik ] —"- South - City of Ontario East - Industrial Pair,- Subarea 12 West - Industrial K&k - Subarea 12 ' I. Site Characterisfl cs: Thls site is partially covered by an abandoned vine a�"an s opus rom the North to the South. II. ANALYSIS- . The purpose of this Parcel flap is to subdivide the area boun Ath, Milliken a ,y 6th, and Pittsburgh into I- parcels. The master :- plan.. for tie area will be discussed with D.R. 86 -0- which is on tonight$ agenda for consideration by the Planning Commission, The first phase of developiert (D.R. 86 -09) will comprise parcels 7 and 8. The total aria will be separated into two large blocks by the dedication and construction oe 5th Street, which is to be constructed full width for the total length from Pittsburgh to Milliken upon recordation of the � Parcel Map. The other streets are already improved-.,except for sidewalks, 'tights, street drive approat)es, and landscaping, whirr will be completed upon development of the a0ja ent parcels,, III. EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES: Overhead utilities consisting of 66 K.V. —a —exist Ines an7 other a ectric along the 4th Street frontage of the project. A condition requiring the undergrourding of all lines except 66 K.V— electrical has been included in the Conditions of Approval. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I o ± e rR tiai Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has corridlated Part II of the Initial Study, -he environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Uocn completion ane. review of the Initial Study and field investigation, S ;Iff found no adverse igpacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. V. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public !tearing have been sect to surrounding propery owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also bean completed, '. A C.J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9896 BIXBYfLEASON POMEROY ASSOCIATES June 11, 1986 Page 3 VI. RECOM14ENDATION• It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input —an—T elements cf Tentativo Parcel Map 9896. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adontion of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, BRH :BK :diw Attachments: Vicinity 'Map Tentative Map Resolution Recommended Conditions of Approval Initial Study 'C-3 VICINITY MAP CITY OF RANCHO CLJCAMONGA ENGMEMUNG ]DIVISION 'el IjM. PAZCEL MAP 9896 T'. • VlCINiTY MAP VaX�, 211.- t/ A t-,J �d rte-+ �f q t '•,ttii 7 o� T �t 3 a El r j p:. tz n Act r� '1i '-+... i f` ..., •:• _ _ 0 + j,: t ;es _ tC Willi x C 7 w' fill to W j 3• k. a 1p �� �1 S t 3 .._ s J: -6 �f q t '•,ttii 7 n T �t 3 GENERAL APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY PART I I For all projects requiring environmental revisw, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Comr,,ttee through the department where the project applica'..ion is made.,; 1�pon receipt of this appliolation, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Co;m ission w{ 'll make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be fi1Edl,', (2) The project, will have a significant environmental 'Imp-.ct and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information, report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information conccrning "he proposed project. Date Filed: March 12, 1936 Project Title: Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Applicant's Nare, Address, Telephone: Leason PLt.eroy Associates _44 Plaza Square, Orange,, CA 92666 (714) 639 -5541 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: Phil Kroeze; Leason Pomeroy Associates 44 Plaza Square, Oranga, 92666 (714)639 -5541 Location of Project: North of 4th 5t., East o= 11i11ikei. Ave., Soutli of 6th St,, West of Pittsburgh Ave. Assessor's Parcel No.: Dc a 251 -57; 0229 - 261 -59 Li-. other permits necessary from local, ;•egianal, state and federal agencies a d the aver cy issuing such perm1ts :__1M 1l anUU c and bril lin; permits only I -1 C KI 11 PP.OdECT DESCRIPTION Proposed usa or proposed project: Licht Industrial Acreage of project area.and square footage of existing and proposed builditigs, if any: Site 35t Acres Building:;: Parcel 7 27,714 s.f., Site Area: Parce'k 4 2.1 AC Parcel 8 35,760 s.f. Parcel 1 2.6 AC Describe the environmental setting of the project site including information on topography, soil stability, plants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, _land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary . sheets): tSee Attached Narrative) Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact No Pte-2 I -2 =5 n. d contours? X IS pRa3EGC ;,- in ground duce •,.�.. Nii t change noise of or substantial ,n wlistin9 I, Create a 1 change i al a subst nt"a is P Create• or g• a in demand f r mu vibraion e, ` tanti Chang sewag F a s fire, water, Gene'rul �--- 3_ Create ub`:a, Zoning or X 5ervices �P° c ,� the ex,sting Create chan5 Lions? Plan design° Now man - trees? of Poi :entiallY' X„.,o existing or osal 5 Remove any for use di is substance'•'• d x essarY Create the nee ials sucn „s 1 sheet_. °. 6' hazardous maters losivesl h additiena ' ables or attar �—� flamm YES answers above anY ExPlavation of this Pr•o Z *L 1 F� lass 1 solid wa_s�te qmi�t�er 91 Of sewage and, �Eu�E¢� daily by this 1e oust ener � am � tea Estimate daily .' W try iP� f ° will generate anFs t� u red for this auto g, Estimae the umber of fillings re3 �60o cu. d. pr01ec "C.-_ -�? t of grading 36, 6�: d• F�ll • 36 ComPla�: G tial "snits, the amours ands._- of residers g, Fstimate in cubic Y construction protect' in ra�ect invc teesgene d above and If the P the nex page. furnish aired for this Ia' ,he {crm on , -hat the {acfi'+ statements and tifY Q;,ta and infotha iohefa krowled9 I hereby V%r the and of MY to SON= is present m, ability, to the bes'c may be require9 CER"CIFIf • zxhibi best of , correct information the Plann the attache }uat to the are trueta additional be made by tial in"' in o man ors P�z'unaE stand that e`,luatior. can I furs — an adequate beli=ubmitted before �Ls be s . Si.�nature pivislon. ©ate 3 1 I -3 ONE 91l $tmlebaker Ruad calllbrnia 9OH15 213 493 14:5 U Yrsnrgr.t. R —Ad A,11 -14- RnKe , .. March 21, 1986 City of Rancho Cucam7nga C(- Attnz Planning /EngiLeering Staff Rt:: Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Master Plan Development Dear Statt Members: BIXBY DEYEL'1PMIENT COMPANY We would l.lke to accompany~ this presenter .-Jon of material with a personal ;iote abol t our firm and thoughts pertaining to the property at hand. Let us begin by thanking each of you for taking the time to review these plans and provide vour respCt�, Ave,input. Bixby Ranch Company- is extremely excited, not only about the project itself, but also about being involved in -Che development of your city. Obviously we ;wee this will br a profitable ussociatioa, but ,ne of. the reasons we were drawn _o the Inland Xrnpir�- is our feeling of common heritage. Bixby Ranch: Company began as a ranchinr• concern over 100 years ago and ha.i been closely involved with the State's agricultural and urban development ever since. The cornerstone of the Company's success and stability over the years is its deep and lasting respect for both the land entrusted to it and the communities in which it's located. we have a long- stending reputation for integrity and excellence,; Over tha years. we've been responsible for the development and management of shopping centers, office buildings and industzi.al parkc a4 well as a variety of apartment buildings, restaurants ,nd countr, - -,lobs. j Bixby has always taken its strw�trdshi, of land very seriously, striving to accomplis what is right for the land arA its surrounding communities. we rely on 3.arut from tr se communities and make every effort to be; responsive to their needs, both present and future, i S I 0701-02 o 6-11-86 PC Agenda 2 I Page 2. Our experience has shown us that this app I roach only makes good busiress sense as such responsiveness*has resulted in adding value to our developments in the long run. We have assembled a team of outstandina architects and engineers to provide the planning and design services. Each member has an impressive track record of quality performance and share= our own high level of integrity and commitment. We are privileged to work with such a fine group. our selection of this particular 35 -acre property followed several years of research and analysis. we shard your perception that Ranzi,,6 Cucamon-a is the gateway to the Inland Empire - the faute" growing community in the country right now. And we see our property as being located at one of the entrances to that gateway. Bixby is fully committed to creating a development whose quality is consistent with the image we believe the city enjoys as a whole. Our plans call for a 13-parcel division, accomodating potential users o-,, one parcel or com.�ination of parcels. We understand that our job not only includes the initial development of land, but constant maintenance and attentiveness t,-) the needs of its users. As the business complexion of the area changqp, so will the function of our users and our de•velopment concept j,s being designed to evolve accordingly. The Project The Rancho Cucamonga Business Park is located in the Southeast sector of the City cf Rancho Cucanonga, It is bordered to the North by Sixth Street, to the South by Fourth•Street and to the Wept and East by Milliken and Pittsburgh, respectively. The 35.5-acre site will be bisected by Fifth Street running East West. 1 �m a IE Page 3. The overall master plan concept for the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park is to, create a single unified development- Within which individual identity is achieved through consistent planning. The parcels would be individual and self- supportinq. Shared entries will be imFismented between adjacent parcels t�h reduce the total number of curb cuts along any one street. The bui.lding!� will all be organized on their parcels with the main building frontage facing toward the main frontage street; therefore, containing the service to the rear of the parcels. The Site The site is relatively flat and will be graded to flow from North to ^uth. The eleaation of the entire site will be slightly elevated from the adjacent roadways. The solar orientation of the site and ultimately the buildings is a true North South relationship. ''The winds are from the Southwest in the morning escalating to a prevailing breeze from the West in the afternoon. Views from the development are Borth to the dramatic San Bernardino Mountains and to the distant San Gorgonio Mountains to the East. Access to the site is primarily1by Milliken, which runs North South from the I -10 Freeway past the Western edge of the sit North to the city of Rancho Cucamonga proper. Access is also achieved East West by Sixth and Fourth street frcn the I -15 Freeway past the Northern and Southern edge of the site. The Architectural Concept EThe building types that will be developed are intended to be one or two - tenant buildings with office, manufacturing or assemblage uses, all of which will have varying servicing requirements. Building sizes will vary upward from 20,000 s.f. Page 4. The flexible programtzing of the development is that of responding to varying market options. The 'irst• phase development will be speculative but potential build-to- suit lot sales to individual users or parcel combinations may occur in ordcAr to attract users in the future. The design guidelines will e;-�ablish common building elements and amenities. Sot" of these elements would be materials, colors and pli! ring pallettes. Amenities will also be specified such'$s planted arbors or pergolas, enriched plazas or courtyards adjacent to entries and architectural walls that screen service areas. The_.creatlon..of people places such as jo7ling pathz, a-par__course and individual-building out(; . 0C eating patios will be designed into the project. , The design guidelines are intended to ensure basic design criteria conformance to create a master planned;, cons.istancy co the entire 35.5 -a7re development. Individual identity will be achaved through creative interpretation of these guidelines throughout the development. The Landscape Concept. The landscape is a kkey ingredient in ble.iding architectural massing, varied land uses, and City criteria into. an overall character. The .Landscape serves to organize circulation patterns, solar influences, areas of differing uses and open space into a quality image. Rancho Cucamonga agricultural and' historical references are an integral factor in the propoaed development. The landscape framework shall reflect land use, roadway Adths and open space. Evergreen corridors running in a North South direction will provide shade patterns 1 while East west Corridors planted with deciduous trees encourage solar penetzation.. Pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular circulation patterns are designed to avoid j conflict. 2 I] E t Page 5. The landscape or interior parcels s4all recognize landscape framework and extend the framework where appropriate. Trees, s' „rubs and vines compliment the architecture and soften building massing. Shady parking areas occur under evergreen canopy trees. Plant materials are selected for their aesthetic quality as well as low maintenance and water r_quirements. Irrigation and maintenance of all plantings ensures '- their viability. Phase one Structures Phase one will consist of two buildings; one at 25,000 s.f. and the second at 35,000 s.t. Each of these first two builCIngs are divisible into one or two tenants each. Future phases or the master planned development are intended to provide the greatest flexibility and the highest and best use of the property. Therefore, future combining of parcels could occur to accomodate the large single user build -to -suit. Covenants, conditions and restrictions as well as architectural design guidelines would be established to ensure quality design and development integrity thoughout our Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Master Plan Development. To gesture the historical rural context of the site, design elements were established to further integrate the development to its surroundings. Planced arbors, trellises and pergolas will reference the "vineyard” context. These theme elements will be integrated into all the future building designs as the major architectural unifying elements. It will also serve as an element that will visually soften these often box- like structures. Additional elements that will be integrated into all the designs will be freestanding "architectural walls" that extend from the building face creating signage and color opportunities as well as containing service areas. These walls will also act as sight line baffles. JI Page 6. We want to participate in the growth of Rancho Cucamonga, and we believe our recent purchase of-a nearby building within the city limits serves as evidence of our interest and support. SO you could say we're already investing in your future. And this heightens our enthusiasm in the project all the more,. The historical importance of this area has been kept in mind almost as much as its future importance. we tried to incorporate this heretage into thy: design of the structures and landscaping. We are looking forward to working with the City and its staff on this project. Very truly yours, . .A i� 'cbe Principals of Bixby Development Company, 0 1= 141 1 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE�IITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9896 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9896), LOCATED between 4th and 6th Streets and between Milliken and Pittsburgh Avenues WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9896, submitted by Bixby /Leason Pomeroy Associates and cnnsisting of 13 parcels, located between 4th and 6th Streets and between Milliken and Pittsburgh Avenues, being a division of Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map No. 6085 as recorded in Book 70 of Parcel Maps pages 74-i " records of San Bernardino County; and WHEREAS, on March 12, 1986, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above-described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 1986, t }e Planning Commission hG�d a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESO!VED AS SEf740N is That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting - property. SECTION 2: That this project will not treats significant adverse eivironmenta impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on June 11, 1986 SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 9896 is approved subject to the recomme n ea Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11th DAY OF JUNE, 1986. 1 i PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. StoR, C6airman ATTEST: Braa Buller, Deputy Secretary 9� I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at d regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the llth day of June, 1986, by the foTiowing vote -to -grit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r--16 LA 11 C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REC"ENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: Between 4th and 6th Street and TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO: 9896 between Miliken and Pittsburgh Avenue DATE FILED: March 12. 1986 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A division of Parcel l & NUMBER OF LOTS: 18 2 of P.M. 6085 as recorded in Book 70 GROSS ACREAGE: 35± Pages 74 -77 records of San Bernardino Co. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO:229- 226 -60 &61 DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER /SURVEYOR Bixby /Leason Bixby /Leason Fuscoe Williams Len 9ren & SH-ort 911 Studebaker Road 911 Studebaker Road 601 N. Park Center Dr. Long Beach, CA 90815 Long Beach, CA 90815 Santa Ana, CIT92705 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal 'Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited to, the following: A. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: 54 feet on Sth Street additional feet on " additional feet on X 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. X 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: See Special Conditions - G - 1 X 5. Reciprocal- access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of a',l common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C. &R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. X 6, All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on thi map per City Engineer's requirements. X 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. B. Street Improvements 'Fursuant to the ity of Ranch Cucamonga. Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation ok' the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.G. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed fnr all half - section streets. X S. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to recordation for 5th Street Prior to building permit issuance for parcels fronting 4th Street, 6th Street, Milliken Avenue, and Pitt`— s ih vend Curb : A.C. Side- drive Street Street A. C. Median Street Name Gutter Pvmt.. Walk Appr. Trees Lights Overlay Island* Other 5th Street X X X X X X 4th Street ** X X 6th Street ** X X Pittsbirgh X X X X _ Milliken ** X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter **Meandering 2 Y � e� -ii E MI f$ L. L. J X 4 Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addW on to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil En�lneer ana app 4ed_ by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an. encroachment permit. X 6. Developer shall coordi,iate, and where n2cessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. _ 3. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the grope• °ty shall be undergrounded. ` X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X g. Street night locations, as required, are to be approved by the `thPrn Cplifornia Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucan,�,_ya. Lights f 11 be an decorative poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. _X 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. C. Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the city Engineer and City Attor ^ay, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recording for 5th Street and /or prior to building permit issuance for Milliken, Pittsburgh, 4th Street and 6th Street. 2 A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the snap for the following: 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of ail on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit for 3 Ir-19 D, Llraina a and f loa::i Control �j L Private drainage Rasements�'!f cross -lot drainage shall -'be required, shall Ca deli?;eated or noticed, on the final map. X Z. Adegt- ate provisions srtol1 be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation at the map, a hydrologic ;nd drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer far review, 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff Grading X 1, Grading of the subject property shazi -a in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final adding plan shall be in substantial conformance witq, jpp;uved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a g licensed by the State of ,California tc uerform such work prior to issuance of building petgtit. 3. Argeological report shall be prepared by a:,qualified engineer o geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. i 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to I recordatfon of the final subdivision map or issuance of buildipj permit whichever comes first. X S. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuanrr of building permit. Ex 4 I" -IFC✓' �1 L E. Ger«,r?? Requirements Andulvvrovals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans for San Bernardino oufiEy- Fload Cont"ol istrict X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water X7— San Bernardino County trust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other X 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R,'s) apprwred by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephu „e prior to street coostructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Hater District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. lytis subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control D'.str4ct. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits -e- .requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availab.1ity of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. B. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the ;frail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance or X 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82-1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of firal map submittal, the following shall be r submitted. Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets, "? copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or- showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. Notice of intent to ,join the propojaed Median Island .ands ^ipe District shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the Final Map. G. Special Conditions: 1. Vehicular ingress and egress rights shall be dedicated to the City on the following streets: 4th Street and 6th Street; Milliken except for four (4) openings as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map. 2. Private drainage easements for c -oss lot , drainage shall be delineated on the Parcel Map. 3 Slope easements for lot grading shall be delineated on the Parcel ;dap. 4. Thu, existing overhead u W ty lines, except for 66 K.V. or larger electrical, along 4th Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole west of Milliken Avenue to the first pole east of Pittsburgh Avenue prior to occupancy of any parcel. S. Secondary access easements shall be provided for Parcels ! 1,2,3,4,5,6,11 and 12 and shoh..'an the Parcel i1ap or provid6n by the by C.G. &R's. H. Raster Plan: i. The Master Plan text and /or the C.C. &R's for Parcel Map 9896 shall be developed to incorporate following conditions 2 through 14, and submitted for Planning Commission review and approval prior t3 recordation of Parcel Map 9896 or issuance of building permits for Phase i development, whichever comes first. 2. The Master Plan is approved in concept only and future developments for each parcel shall be subject to Development /Design review process for Planning Commission approval. Modifications to the! Master Plan shall be eubject to Planning Co,* scion approval. 3. "Campus -like setting" for the Master Pian shalt be emphasized by providing landscape and hardsc,,pe along at least one entire street frontage per parcel and by varying the landscape /building setback beyond the minimum average 45 ft. for Milliken Avenue, 4th Street, and 6th Street, and minimum average 25 ft. for Pittsburgh Avenue sod 5th Street. 6 ,a. } k, 4. Perimeter landscaping for the entire sitw'Master Plan shall be provided with Phase I development to emphasize the image of the "campus -like setting" with a unifying landscape theme and continuous pedestrian walkway. 6. A landwtr N. program establishing installation and maintenance criteria fOr -'the shared planter islands a ' the interior property lines shall be developed and approved with the Master Plan. 6. A uniform design program for security fencir.; shall be developed and J approved with the Master Plan, and sutlect to the approval of Flo }hilt Fire District and the City Planner, 7. Te;,turized pavement identifyierg pedestrian paths shall be provided at all driveway entrances and shall be of brick pavers, exposed aggregate, broom finished concrete or a combination of them, subject to City Planner aporoval and pedestrian connections shall be provided from the perimeter sidewalk to the main building entrance for each parcel. 8. Location and conceptual design of transit stops and related - pedestrian facilities shall be provided and shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and approval. g. The conceptual design of the "Gateway" a symbolic, entry statement shall 'be provided to 4th Street and Milliken Avenue; and such symbolic entry statement be shall repeated at 6th Street and Milliken, 6th Street and Pittshurgh and 4th Street and Pittsburgh. 10. The Uniform Sign Program for the entire Master Plan shall be provided and subject to City Planner review and approval. 11. Pedestrian plazas or courtyards shall be provided immediately <djacent to or near the perimeter greenbelt to promote the proposed "campus -like setting ". These areas shall be designed as focal points. Interior plazas or courtyards, when proposed, shall be secondary to the plazas or courtyards adjacent to or near the_ perimeter greenbelt. 12. Architectural design guidelines shall be developed and should incorporate the following criterias. 9 a. Architectural planes shall have variation in depth and angle to create variety and interest in the basic form and silhouette of the building. 7 )C7' Z3 13. 14.. b. Articulation of the elevation surfaces is encouraged through the use of openings and recesses which create texture and shadow patterns and provide variety i:v the building plane or surfa^1. c. tluilding entrances shall be well articulated and project a formal entry statement through a variation of architectural planes, pavement surface treatment, and landscape plazas. d. Accent treatment such as changes in exterior materials and texture is encouraged in conjunction with variation in the major form giving elements of a structure. A statement through the use of landscaping shall be made to provide a visual connection beWeen the north and south side of 5th Street subject to City Planner approval. Full material samples and color shall be provided for individual development for each parcel CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: E EI I! 11 nvmtrrr.. r � -- v111 -1 1Yilyl Vill ltlJ VtilYlvlmui 0 STAFF REPORT G yc r.. O Q DATE: June 11, 1986 `977 TG: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND OEVELOPM °NT REVIEW 86 -09 - BIXE > /LEASON POMEROY AS OCIATE - The development of a Master Plan for a 35 acre Industrial Park and the first phase consisting of two light industrial build-;gs totaling 63,474 square feet on 4.7 acres of lagd in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), located 'between Milliken Avenue and Pittsburgh Avenue and between 6th Street and 4th. Street - APN 229 - 261 -58, 59. RELATED FILE: PARCEL MAP 9896 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of conceptual Master Plan, Phase I site plan and elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Meldisco, industrial building under construction; General Industrial, Subarea 11. South - Vacant, pity of Ontario East - Approved industrial project, vacant; Industrial Park District, Subarea i2, West - Vacant; I-idustrial Park District, Subarea 12. C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial Park North - General Industrial South - Not available, City of Ontario East - Industrial Park Wes{: - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The s��te is vacant and vegeti3tion consists of decaying vineyards. The northeast corno ,of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue is designated as The Gatew�l to tae rite. ITEMS G ?LANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 86 -09 - Bixby /Leason Pomeroy Assoc. June 11, 1986 rare 2 II. ANALYSTS: A. General: 1. Master Plan: The intent of this Master Plan Is to serve as a guideline for future development througV establishing driveway acce•,s, overall circulation system, drainage patterns, ar',' architectural design concept. All future developments within the Master Plan boundary would require separate development /design review. A related parcel map is also being considered by the Planning Commission at this meeting. A separate staff report has been included for your s°zyiew. The proposed Maz�t�r Plan subdivides the site into 13 parcels ranging from the -.rze of 2 acres to 7 acres where 'ne eitension of 5th Street would bisect the site area into two parts. the Master Plan is intended to create a single unified development withir- but maintaining individual identity as well as being self - supporting. This is achieved through speculative, built -to -suit lot sales to individual users such as Phase I development. Each individual proposed development will have individual plaza /open space area, To emphasize a pedestrian oriented camp=s -like setting for the Master Plan, the developer is proposing to install perimeter landscaping fo.- the entire Mas;.er Plan boundary with Phase I development. 2, Phase I Development: Phase I development is )cated on the north side of tuture ath Street. It consists of two light industrial buildings with one tuilding for each parcel, and are self - supporting except for the shared driveway access. Plazas and outdoo, patio areas have been provided for each parcel as shown in Exhibits "H" and "K ". The proposed elevations consist of painted tilt -up concrete panels with painted wing walls that serve as architectural elements as well as screening of surface area as shown in Exhibit "J ". Additional elements such as planter arbors, trellises, and pergolas provide iisual interest to the otherwise simple concrete tilt -up panel buildings. Staff Comment: The proposed architectural elements provide some relief —to the typical bax -like industrial buildings. However, such proposed elevations may set tine tone for the architectural program for the entire Master Plan. Staff is concerned that greater building variation in depth and angle s,.mld be used to create variety and interest in the basic form and silhouette of the building consistent with the goals, of the Industrial Park District. Staff recomrends that strong design 6-Z 0 PLANNING COMMIS!-- -ITAFF REPO21 DR 86 -09 - Bixti eson Pomeroy Assoc. June 11, '986 Page 3 g,,idelines be incorporated in the Master Plan text and the CC & R's for the parcel map to be rev "eweci and approved by the Planning - ommission to ensure that architectural var.;ety will be provided for ;n this Master Plan. Design guidelines could include the following criteria: A. Articulation of the elevation surfaces should be encouraged through the use of openinn-� and recesses which create texture and shadow pTtterns and provide variety in the building plane surface. B. 8uild'ing entrances shall be well articulated and project a formal entr,;, stat =ment through variation of architectural planes, pavement surface treatment, and landscape plazas. C. Accent treatment such as changes in exterior materials and texture is encouraged in conjunction with variation in the major form giving elements of a structure. B. Design Review Committee: the Design Review Committee has reviewed the project and made ;the following recommendations for the proposed Master Plan and Phase I development. Master Plan: 1. Campus -like setting for the Master P1.i be emphasized by requirinc landscape and handscape along at least one entire street frontage per parcel and by varying the landscape /building setback beyond the minimum average 45 foot on Milliken Avenue, 4th Street, and 6th Street, and minimum average 25 feet for Pittsburgh Avenue and 5th Street. 2. Perimeter landscaping for the entire site /Master Plan be provided with Phase I development to emphasize image of a campus -like setting with a unifying landscaping theme and continuous oelestrian walkway. 3. A landscape program establishing instal lationima?ntenance criteria for the shared planter islands at interior property line be developed and approved with the Master Plan. 4. A uniform design program of security fencing be developed and approved with the Master Plan. PLANNINr ;OMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 86 -(;' - Bixby /Leason Pomeroy Assoc. June 11, :986 Page 4 5. Texturized pavement identifying pedestrian paths be provided at all driveway entrances; and pedestrian connections be provided from the per: zter sidewalk to the mzin building entrance for each parcel. 6. Location. and conceptual design of transit stops and related pedestrian facilities be provided subject to Design Review Committee review and approval. ?. The C(Mept4dl design of the Gateway be provided and subject to the Design Review Committee for review and approval. 8. The Uniform Sign Program for ti.- entire "' r Plan be provided and subjected to City Pianner� review approval. 9. Pedestrian pla:.as and courtyards shall be provided immediately adjacent to or near the perimeter greenbelt to promote the proposed campus -like setting. Interior plazas or courtyards, when proposed, shall be secondary to the plazas and courtyards adjacent to or near the perimeter greenbelt. These areas shalt be des•iyr-ed as focal points. 10. Architectural design criteria be developed and approved with the Master Plan. Variation in building planes through the use of openings, varying setbacks, angle walls, and recesses which create texture and shadow patterns is recommended. 11, A statement through the use of landscaping be made to provide a visual r.onnection of the north and south side of 5th Street. The developer has agreed to incorporate the above recommendations into the Master Plan text. However, the developer is requesting that this be submitted at a later date in order to incorporate all of these recommendations in the Master Plan text as well as the CC & R's of the parcel map. Staff recommends that the Master Plan text should be submisted for Planning Commission review prior to the recordation of parcel map or the issuance of building permits for Phase I, whichever comes first. Phase I Development: ?. Convenient pedestrian connections be provided to the main building entrance. 6 ' ! PLANNING COMMISSION .i'AFF REPORT DR R6 -09 - Bixby /Lesson Pomeroy Assoc. June 11, 1.986 Page 5 2. Mounding along Milliken and 5th Street should be undulating. The developer has agreed to the conditions. C. Existira Overhead Utilities: No overhead utilities exist along i:he frontage of the Phase 'I deve"-ipment. However, overhead utilities do exist along 4th Street frontage of the Master Planned si",e. A condition requiring the undergrounding of all tines under 66 KV has been included in the Conditions of Approval for Parcel Map 9896. D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Envirnnmzntal Checklist and has found the only significant environmental impact would be an impact upon the project from Milliken Avenue. Staff recormsends that a final tacoustical report be required for exterior noise as it relates— t°o -Tunih cnerts. Therefore, staff has determined that there will not be a significant impact in this case because the mitigation measures as mentioned above have been added to the Colditlon; of Approval. If the Planning Commission concurs with these Findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR r"INDINGS: This project is consistent with the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan. The project, with the added mitigation measures, rill not cause significant adverse environmental impacts. En addition, the proposed use, building design, site plan for Phase I, and the Master Plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the Industrial Specific Plan anJ all other applicable provisions of the_ City Standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider all the material and input regarding this project. If the Commission concurs with the Findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration, and approval of Development Review 86 -09 would be in order. Res tfully su armed, r idler 1/1 z:: City Planner ( RB:NF;ns C- .,,!5- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT., DR 86-09 - Bixby/Leason Pomeroy'•kssoc June 11, 1986 Page 6 J Attachments: Letter of Master Plan C?nce(t, M I arch 11, 198�i Letter Request`(Ag Addit jona, Time to Submit Master Plan Text, Max 22, 1986 Exhibit "All - LocatiQn M,:p' Exhibit "B" - Site ftilf;ation Map Exhibit 4CII - Parcel; Map Exhibit 'IV" - Maste�' Plan Exhibit IIEI, - Master Grading Plan Exhibit 'IF" - Detailed Site Plan for Phase I Exhibit "G" - Conceptual Grading Plan for Phase I Exhibit "N" - Conceptual LAndscape Plan for Phase I Exhibit "I" - Elevaticns with Landscaping Exhibit "J" - Elevations with No Landscaping Exhibit "KI" - Typical Patio, Plaza Details Resolution of Approval with Conditions 6-6 v 411 iUidehAvr Hmid L,nie Ih•urh (.41ifnniia '10M.i 213 493 1475 P,wrq,.k Prra.n 19. 16a, hk,. {h—W A. W.O.h- xr.— A. Ch,,,,w BIXBY DEVELORMENT COMPANY March 11, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Planning /Engineering Staff Re; -1 as_ velopment Dear Staff Members: W.a would like t- accompany this presentation of material with a personal note about our firm and, thoughts pertaining to the property at hand. Let us begin by thanking each of you for taking the time to review these plans and provide your respeol�sve input. Bixby Ranch Companir is extremely excited; not only about the project itself, but also about being involved in the development of your city. Obviously we feel this will be a profitable association, but one of the reasons we were drawn to the Inland Empire is our feeling of common heritage. Bixby Ranch Company began as a ranching concern over 100 years ago and has been closely involved with the State's agricultural and urban development ever since. The cornerstone of the Company's success and stability over the years is its deep and lasting respect for both the land entrusted to it and the communities in which it's incated. We have a long- standing reputation for integrity and excellence. Over the years, we've been responsible for the development and management of shopping centers, office buildings and industrial parks as well as a variety of apartment buildings, restaurants and country clubs. Bixby has always taken its stewardship of land very seriously, striving to accomplish what is right for the land and its surrounding communities. We rely on input from these communities and make every effort to be responsive to their needs, both present and future. t- - 9 Page 2. E Our expe)ience has shown us that this approach only makes good business sense as such responsiveness has resulted in adding value to our developments in the long run. We have assembled a team of outstanding architects and engineO'TS to provide the planning and design services. Each member has an impressive track record of quality performance and shares our own high level, of integrity and commitment. We are privileged to work with such a fine group. Our selection of this particular 35 -acre property followed several years of research and analysis, we share your Perception that Rancho Cucamonga is the gatewaq *o the Inland Empire - the fastest growing community in the country right now« And we see our property as being hated at ohs of the entrances to that gateway. Bixby is fully committejd to creating a development whose quality is consistent with the image we believe the city enjoys as a whole. Our plans call for a 13-parcel division, accomodating 1 potential users on one parcel or combination of parcels, We understand that our jib not only includes I the initial development of lwnd, but constant maintenance and attentiveness to the needs of its users. As the business complexion of the area changes, so will the function of our users and our development concept is being designed to evolve accordingly. - The Project . cr The Rancho' Cucamonga Business Park is located in the Southeast sector of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. it is bordered to the North by Sixth street, to the South by Fourth Street and to the West and East by Milliken and Pittsburgh, respectively.. The 35,5 -acre site will be bisected by Fifth Street running East West, 11 Page 3. The overall master plan concept frrr the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park is to create a single unified development within which individual identity is achieved through consistent planning. The parcels would be individual and self- supporting. Shared Entries will be implemented between adjacent parcels to reduce the total number of curb cuts along any one street. The buildings will all be organized on their parcels',ith the main building frontage facing toward the main frontage street, therefore, containing the service to the rear of the parcels. The Site The site IS relatively flat and will be graded to flow from North to South. The elevation of the entire site will be slightly elevated from the adjacent roadways. The solar orientation of the site and ultimately the buildings is a true North South relationship. The winds are from the Southwest in the morning escalating to a prevailing breeze from the West it the afternoon. Views from the development are North to the dramatic San Bernardino Mountains and to the distant San Gorgonio Mountains to the East. Access to the site is primarily by Milliken, which runs North South from the I -10 Freeway past the Western edge of the site North to the City of Rancho Cucamonga - proper. Access is also achieved .East West by Sixth and Fourth Street from the I -15 Freeway past the Northern and Southern edge of the site. The Architectural. Concept The building types that will be developed are intended to be one or two- tenant buildings with office, manufacturing or assemblage uses, all of which will have varying servicing requirements. Building sizes will vary upward from 20,000 s..f. Page A. 1A The flexible progra^.uning of the development is that of responding to varying market options. The first phase develop;-,ent will be speculative but potential build -to- suit 10t sales to individual. users or parcel combinations may occur in order to attract users in the future. The design guidelines will establish common building elements and amenities. Some of these elements would be materials, colors and planting palettes. Amenities will also be specified such as planted arbors or pergolas, enriched plazas or courtyards adjacent entries and architectural walls that screen service areas. The creation of people places such as jogging paths, a par course and individual huilding outdoor eating patios will be designed into the project. The design guidelines are intended to ensure basic design criteria conformance to create a master: planned consistancy to the entire 35.5 -acre development. Individual identity will be achieved through creative interpretation of these guidelines throughout the development. The Landscape Concept The landscape is a key ingredient in blending architectural massing, varied land uses, and City criteria into an overall character. The landscape - serves to organize circulation patterns, solar influences, areas of differing uses and open space into a duality image. Rancho Cucamonga agricultural and historical references are an integral factor in the proposed development. The landscape framework shall inflect land use, roadway widths and open space. Evergreen -;z-ridors running in a North South direction will provide sha4� patterns while East West corridors planted with deciduous trees encourage solar penetration. Pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular circulation patterns are designed to avoid conflict. 6-10 r El Page 5. The landscape or interior parcels shall recognize landscape framework and extend the framework where appropriate. Trees, shrubs and vines compliment the architect.re and so;„ten building massing. Shady parking areas occur under evergreen canopy trees. Plant materials are selected for their aesthetic quality as well as law maintenance and water requirements. Irrigation and maintenance of all plantings ensure.; their viability. Phase One structures Phase one will consist of two buildings; "ne at 25,000 s.f. and the second at 35,000 s.f, Each or these first two buildings are divisible in!-o one or two tenants each. Future phases of the master planned development are intended to provide the gveatest flexibility and the highest and best use of the propert,:. Therefore, future combining of parcels could occu,: to accomodate the large single user build -to -suit. Covenants, conditions and restrictions as well as architectural design guidelines would bA established to ensure quality design and development integrity thoughout our Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Master Plan Development. To gesture the historical rural context of the site, design - ;.ements were established to further integrate the development to its surroundings. Planted arbors, trellises and pergolas will reference the "vineyard" context. These theme elements will be integrated into all the future building designs as the major } architectural unifying elements. It will also serve as an element that will visually soften these often box- like structures. Additional elements that will be integrated into all the designs will be freestanding f "architectural walls" that extend from the building face creating signage and color opportunities as well as containing service areas. These walls will also act as sight line baffles. : a, 01, o B$ �w �� °�° � °�`� °� Ace ele �$� � ® l�/ a. C ° � / - � e�o���% \ �� �I e 0 o o�«� 0 0 a e �. # ; e \� \�� °�� °�e� \�� # lx�° \ate \. ae e ° �e� \� #� � ©' -01_ CON , o � \ \ ; \ BIXBY RANCH COINIPANY Pi1EQ u Wx1ty, 9OVMOEA - IBIS 1952 May 22, 1986 Chairman of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 -C Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 >ttn: Nancy Fong Re: A.R. 86 -09 and Tentative P.M. 9896 Dear Sir, We have been requested by Planning Staff to Provide, prior to Planning Commission hearing of the reference cases, a draft of the Architectural and Development Guidelines to be attached to the Mast;erplan of Development of this project. As we are currently scheduled to go before the Commission on June 11, and only received this additional request oil May 19, we feel that this does not leave us adequate time to prepare the requested guideline and have staff review it without father delay of Phase I of the project. We would therefore like to suggest that the guidelines could be submitted for review prior to recordation of the Final Map without delaying approval of .Phase I or the Tentative Map. This would Still allow adequate time ror preparation and review of a guideline Vilich would properly incorporate the Planning Commission approved zonditions oi' approval of Phase I and the Map. Si�cerely, f � . vvi xo1 . Judi M. M :Caslin Project Xanager cc: Phil Kroeze /Lesson - Pomeroy & Associates , } Ulu 411 MOEBAKER ROAO+ LONG BEACH. CAUFOR11A 90815 • TELEPHO,4E 493.1475 • AREA CODE 213 �"�^'•..�tv^•, ".....,,} � -- -•fin,. � t �l 3M 4{ Ye.IVT p � I Vii Hill hill lull P[ Is "A P JIM ot b -. .�.�� �M ���. .tom: ,r >• ��. �< )f � .._ _ iu 6-475- . .............. AIR= lium I iffiffififth ,; I f Ca Ell p f _, ! 0 JR,� El � f ZI I a e s a A 7.1 H r t 6 -td 0 >s _ k - r� O iz- Q lit ,. �� tiro ` t _► `� L-i-A r t 6 -td 0 >s _ k - r� O iz- Q 11 6-19 ig vu PU MEL !"SIP Mill $1 I I Irli ig Irk ik -4 ,14 r all sc�s FM r h,-um H, M i 6-20 I1 F F I e I fir I �� � \. � ] /� \- � {{ � / \ 11 ll�w }! |� < / � 2211 � A 02 4iv ;L T $/ I fir I �� � \. � ] /� \- � {{ � / \ 11 ll�w }! |� < / � 2211 � A 02 El .I � �k rl lu �x i t R a 6 ASK tu- . f { � S Js zz� QI i o Ai I! Ic 11 I /.7 �Q 1 v s 9 �Q 1 v F 6 -2cp f 11 O { O i ti ®!I A U R. El El 6 -29 !t tIt Ohl 1 1 -,I 1 0 >-(Oe s U w J 7 1 • � -Ts 4 Y r tY� �r t it ty yam./ � ir.• GV' r, 4 1 01 Em 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -09 FOR A 35 ACRE MASTER PLAN AND PHASE I DEVELOPMENT CONSISTAU- OF 2 LIGHT MANUFACTURING BUILDINGS TOTALING 63,474 SQUARE FEET LOCATED BENEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND PITTSBURGH AVENUE AND UETWEEN STH STREET AND 4TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 5th day of June 1986, a complete application was filed by Bixby Development Ltd. One for review of the above - described project; and HHEREAS, on the 11th day of June, 1986, thr: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as . ' SECTION 1: 7at tae following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of tke. General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan; and 4. That the proposed use, together with tht conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or - elfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vit.inity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment anu that a Negative Declaration is issued on June 11, 1986. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 86 -09 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: (5-29 Resolution No. DR 86 -09 June 11, 1986 Page 2 PLANNING DIVJZ-S�l A. Master 'Plan. 1. The Master Plan is approved in concept only and future development for aach parcel shall be subject is Development /Design review procQss for Planning Commission approval. Modifications to the Master Plan shall b,: subject to Planning Commission approval. 2. "Campus -like setting" for the Master Plan shall be emphasized by providing landscape and handscape along at least one entire street frontage per parcel and by varying the landscape /building setback beyond the minimum average 45 ft. for Milliken Avenue, 4th Street, and 60 Street, and minimum average 25 ft. for Pittsburgh Avenue and 5th Street. 3. Perimeter landscaping for the entire site /Master Plan shall be provided with Phase J development to emphasize the image of the "campus -like setting" with a unifying landscape theme and continuous pedestrian walkway. 4. A landscape program establishing installation and mainten!nce criteria for the shared planter islands at the interior property lines shalt be developed and approved with the Master Plan. 5. A uniform design program for security fencing shall be developed and approved with the Master Plan and subject to the approval of Foothill Fire District and the City Planner. 6. TeAturized pavement identifying pedestrian paths shall be provided at all driveway entrances and shall be of brick pavers, exposed aggregate, broom finished concrete or a combination of them, subject to City Planner approval; and pedestrian connections shall be provided from the perimeter sidewalk to the main building entrance for each parcel. 7. Location and conceptual design of transit stops and related pedestrian facilities shall be provided and shall be subject to Design [review Committee review and approval. 8. The conceptual design of the "Gateway«, a symbolic entry statement, shall be provided to 4th Street and Milliken Avenue; and such symbolic ant "y statement shall be repeated at 6th Street and Milliken, 6th Street and Pittsburgh, a�.d 4th Street & Pittsburgh. 6 - 030, 2 Resolution No. DR 86 -09 June 11, 1986 Pave 3 9. The Uniform Sign Program for the entire Master Plan shall be provided and subject to City Planner review and approval. 10. Pedestrian plazas or courtyards shall be provided immediately adjacent to or near the perimeter greenbelt to promote the proposed "c vus -like setting ". These areas shall be designed as focal pointF, Interior plazas or courtyards, when proposed, shall be secondary to the plazas or courtyards adjacent to or near the perimeter greenbelt. 11. Architectural design guideV^ - shall be developed and should incorporate the follow)r<g criteria: a. Architectural planes shall have variation in depth and angle to create variety and interest in the basic form and silhouette of the building, ti b. Articulation of the elevation surfaces is encouraged through the use of openings and recesses which create i texture and shadow patterns and provide variety in the building plane or surface. Ell c. Building entrances shall be well articulated and project a formal entry statement through a variation of architectural planes, pavement surfl -.- treatment, and landscape plazas. d. Accent treatment such as changes in exterior materials and texture is encouraged in conjun,-.iion with variation in the major form giving elements of a structure. 12. A statement through the use of landscaping shall be made to provide a visual connection between the north and south side of 5th itreet subject to City Planner approval. 13. Full material samples and color shall be provided for individual development each parcel. 14. The Master Plan text and /or the CC & R's for Parcel Map 9896 shall be developed to incorporate Conditions A -1 through A -13, and sutmitted for Planning Commission review and approval prior to recordation of Parcel Map 9896 or issuance of building permits for Phase I development, whichever comes first. 6 -3 1 Resolution No. DR 8e -J9 ,une 11, 198E ige 4 0 B. Phase 1: 1. A uniform Sign Program for the Master Plan and Phase I deve:e,tiept shall be provided and submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Detailed plans for the symbolic "Gateway" entry statement including landscaping theme shal'r be submitted to Design Review Committee for review and approval prior to issuance of building permi'�s. 3. The 1st service rol; up doors shall be moved closer to the middle of the rear e' +vation tur buildings within parcel 8 (east elevation) and within parcel 7 (north elevation), 4. Detailed plans for public transit facilities such as hus stop, and � tf•ar street furniture, shall be submitted for Design Review Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. A final acoustical report to reduce he exterior noise per the City requirements for lunch courts shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for Phase I. 6. Detailed landscape and irrigation plan for the perimeter landscaping theme for the entire Master Plan shall be submitted for review and approva' prior to issuance of building permits for Phase I. 7.. A •ontinuous hedgerow to screen pa; °ping area that fronts on 5th Street and Pittsburgh Avenue shall be r ,vided. 8, Undulating mounding s €call be provided along 5th Street. 9, All texturized pedestrian connect,,ons shall be of brick pavers, exposed aggregate, broom finished concrete or a combination of them, subject to City Planner approval. Samples shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. 10. All screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and where possible a roof parapet wall shall be used to screen roof - mounted equipments. If roof s, 'een is needed, it shall be of an i.rchitec*urally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design. Full material sample of such roof screen shall be submitted for City Planner approval prior to issuance of building permits. 6 -.3?- Resolution No. DR 86 -09 June 11, 1986 Page 5 r, ENGINEERING DIVIISION 1. The entire width of 5th Street, from Milliken Avenue to Pitts`urgh Avenue, shall be improved. 2. Tire ,parcel map relating to the Master Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 8. Private drainage easement for cross lot drainage shall be delineated on the parcel man, or provided by CC & R's. CC & R's shall be approved by the City Attorney and recorded concurrently with the parcel map. 4. Slope easement for tat grading shall be delineated on the parcel map. 5. Vehicular egress and ingress rig €its shall be dedicated to the City on the following Streets: Milliken Avenge, except for openings as shown on the tentW ve parcel map and the entire- frontage on 4th Street and 6th Street. 6. Easement for shared access shall be prt,ided and be recorded with the parcel map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF 'flE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the ioregoing Resolution was duly and l regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of June, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: � -33 z 41 U W C L G 'r mL U�u`o.L Oa:i �,yNa uYOU t q d 4v o9T�pN= ygN X < oc« .qb °u E ` V..p�d CUioG LV YEra w >u O'Oby �^.. ••' E V d Ob qi v ^•^ O L �� 2 y.2 z„°,aocnm ary 3u �LO O'pq u€ W o y E L p LL c u EE c L �q qa aLi. d 4ow @E t Y a.r 8 iqr VN ~•- QA N`LyL4.N �dN vN b L i0 C N °n Yq bSNLgi+- b) f• W x G O 2 � u o V C O � Z N iE 4 v brow '"a ba_. Nb Y .ro GE u °• N 64 L � � �i Q, qu ^GG ro.,_.0 LdL Va t Nq'�ju dC L.ru CVY Gnu r dd�4 YQti bL. Y q�q g �EG.1EyyC yVUd° da. i1 yrnCO Ynd g ;� V U Z! <auSW ,-Y+• ai �� con Eo ~ ^c3w aaM v��yb yu ^.Oi -0auyY i,,,, N�N N N YCL ^q rnv9 r =�yn pu° cY�c�o i b v .- EEgauN Nth d4 } Y6� L qE �^ O Tbti46 L Yq0 ° ONY4 Y u Y e a oc Y�c EwL °a p b e s o o. rwY _ u F- O? 2) x S Y M 6 N +• Y ++ 2 Q O N m !- L O. L 6 V F 6 O h J U O h 4 1 j NE •� O �� ^u N•E 6R• �c N.d-. ur Y� °mi:i N^ N 4mu,t 4. 11YC:tl Z y yyy y ^^ c LAN 6 _ N t.CO Or -Y.b- N < N • by ��L �Yw� ~Y t ° Yoa = Yaia z +� V 9y'°o+Lao ^N°e. c c L YM 1� G= q ..C-a+ C O O 00 q Oyb NOI`•^C' G E •- 6T �u W�d ZV NN so F `•yC 2w-u 6.OS YU�Y � ` C qC C ggq v.OYC T D L NY -,p Pte} y�i y4 s- '°^N+~ q O Q w H q 'u 1OON 2.� Nia.r N 1.1 1Il rl 11 El I] •CCpY nL Ou CL d>1 c C� A u Gnaw W d L b y Y O c y ' O a d L d z a. rnp n a u 9 Y a °uw+ ° °y OOO ."-6N LKS d NC C��N u F b 2 ?•+ N� °c C m = Nid N ' >dp1 �A�N ya cam° �aLb tit b dl.TC �Nt gaNCT° rV4� 4 •s RL b .+ n Y.0 Y`a q dr° -.°na �p r q Y L c+° 6M L u L Y U E Asc yZ b�F VN� n.r a�M y Nyc NzY y E d9 b9 Y L V b u u 9 c A v r G ny C v5 qT cE N u �3 ^c a L —n Q U d �t w ,- - ENi .ad ^EUL4��j °p6.'b� 1�KaY- 46y c v cE VY a mii) 4'O wc„�ONUu r ti 1 Ni rAY y+t• N d °vo gxg GCaJ j O H�q^ STq L _NL >Y w°i � Bpi � rC Oly' x iSVCip9N Au ui °.°emu Y N N �c a a'a1AT z� U.�9y q C �apayo Ltd�YN V r a Y"sT H y M.y Q ub3C G a A C Y vm =t vp� i L an°n N t C La �V'.y0 a1'14.9 C C b V d .. m O V u u`k u iO u L 6w. N cqy Q A 6 rl ♦�.t 1 i r �ndidC Oq.G j]..r� w . tf10."NOY V N ►aLdAd ay w b4 as L. C �Vy� Eas a _ 090= PLASM CAEE aE a: -, ` -�L nM d y�' O�w°'eNy Cd q p.Y- 4VG nnMq �r. b R q � 0 B � N Cu O ".O e• Y O u t Q •C 4 L° C � 9 Y •q u w y F v� o� Q O du�ads aN 'r' N> Q �Ou a—ydlaaoc"' y � E oa q.n� Ld -0.4Od aav � Lr°cy >°an°• ,a°c q E Oq CA4a 'a q' 96U>�u^ly �atEE V 'p0 �v LL yH � -a°t �.� 'O LL y Nu Ly LbP LG.Y w hg0d� pr y CINUd 6Ny TNa �Nb rSq dM. � �oN� t] di uvSiuL • 'c^ 0. �Ya uNN�vdy J ~� OJ LC.... R. d T >t Y rQ ^. :{: Oea.p o N YU �O '. . tn� ac .L A dN ate. ° °• -d> °y u',c'o x dLyn cngw ^. u°i .e S. bo`)«n 4.. d°1a.•. i��o°iaw 85 °'•- N E> _ L Y� n •- J 7 O x T'^' � N V N ESTyi! „ L F C y u q. 6 y y1. � ON j d u t1*. ^•G b q. ° OG C ca �+ ^d e:)� Of r -yNb N �a 0.6: CpLY � cYL a uN d+�'h L NC �N � Lw ~�dL6 byLF6 YGYa d'a Oduya� �6Q Ytaiq OaYi nd91 Cy 0.0 N��'^ r. °bY pqy� °y L N. YyEy °F•dG LO bOfN tiCY _ L +� r-• �y O2MVl Li.+ yai+.°Ut N9Y FFCV AAE nLa �Y O)°ruN y ud -.%E dCY Q .sad G. ti 1 uan� d tii NZNU�ii=3u'Ci 41V �1 4M MN vM cL C +`.0. c C ~1 V +E-Y. ° a Wr.-.3 �C Ni ^ 6L ✓.y0 A q Nd6 •CCpY nL Ou CL d>1 c C� A u Gnaw W d L b y Y O c y ' O a d L d z a. rnp n a u 9 Y a °uw+ ° °y OOO ."-6N LKS d NC C��N u F b 2 ?•+ N� °c C m = Nid N ' >dp1 �A�N ya cam° �aLb tit b dl.TC �Nt gaNCT° rV4� 4 •s RL b .+ n Y.0 Y`a q dr° -.°na �p r q Y L c+° 6M L u L Y U E Asc yZ b�F VN� n.r a�M y Nyc NzY y E d9 b9 Y L V b u u 9 c A v r G ny C v5 qT cE N u �3 ^c a L —n Q U d �t w ,- - ENi .ad ^EUL4��j °p6.'b� 1�KaY- 46y c v cE VY a mii) 4'O wc„�ONUu r ti 1 Ni rAY y+t• N d °vo gxg GCaJ j O H�q^ STq L _NL >Y w°i � Bpi � rC Oly' x iSVCip9N Au ui °.°emu Y N N �c a a'a1AT z� U.�9y q C �apayo Ltd�YN V r a Y"sT H y M.y Q ub3C G a A C Y vm =t vp� i L an°n N t C La �V'.y0 a1'14.9 C C b V d .. m O V u u`k u iO u L 6w. N cqy Q A 6 rl ♦�.t 1 i l � • .00NO CO PLO. CNiipu Tt P= P EL�'d Ouu ^� 10 �- A2 LOCO LU CIL T� L N« T E a°O T U r .2 a'^ E L a L ^d u 9« u 09 L�'uVUUpyr 00 E °d d o (c a my uo pu^ao i °° N> °'mac �p, LY AW r••bp ..Oib� .ON t Z w.Sby E°n.� pd Yu C40OO�N�YywjT c9a ^H b ..r Lid t L _ C w G dd N �C � 5c a� °• .o.°n .--up o No iaa as y'N' M°s iO ^ «« � LyC M bCIC p WC���O� LCL� � q N„r �pLDO 9« 1,. a C w06rC «Lp'tU GqC �•�.. c �NVN v N •haw v2 aWadYN «qq.«i� �v.Crs ° r�qL. Er «d «�q NT q« y' —ZNHY q 9 w «L n•N'I . \.''NAVyu' yu ^�pa�ep wa �S c� d � b � y d o d. Lb a a. o ^- w « u � .� c q•- ° w ` •' } �,`o.. N....+ � apa YaLi .°n L.ci r `�� a m e• •^ L ,..lt ,rN Cy w a Aql LN nL s�o �c�o `o.- ° my y gd.da i.dc�N�•- a emu°•,- N '3C liL> _ wp Yb O�aYY dip mg �`L LOON ac= T�pLi €d • \VJ1 +`'ni`ON KN^ �tN .L NO 1- «L 4N Yr•^' i0iq p0 4of 4Y Y.O N + A a °' u *. dwv PA, 'mom tacq 4r°.. NaS c rn�a as c w � °e��o. �. n s'�^ c vdi a o ^ •_+.« 'r^ « yo°' A $ i=y„ o ofs 9',S d.L. 4N. rar�n •`••• 'aDa 9 .°r q N L�+aq >�n Cd O !!Ldy �=°. I^`o i _ ' d O N 9 N yT i.Y Qty T Gr �• L• + u d L}• T �uo �P .D LS uc � �a w ra arE «mil 64C Lo1� �N V 4 YE C =� C bO uE.i' LdNO° d m`T LV p • ~ T p L C t UY o` «•,, aL aN y T it t L Y Nay EE« C ^•� pN.p . Euu u•uNb .' G� nm N.^.`oN ^U- L °q ipcoc Ey w Lr4w. d` dS = ..C. tNx uriN.fde ��. d pya �> U qQj a.°LO y «.°CC Aa ds EE V` � u G L .G- U N• C V w` 9 « V r 'q « C L p C u`i q& .u� uq C p y�v N 1✓ u�` i!d °L �C° • ddM^ ac.ACqu •e .. ^ u EZ 41.i 4O 6Qn 4N6A WGd.Gw vpi M.r V d 6 o i/ — 3 Na ^Qa a9 ^a Yp L u T L �:i o • L N a .'�icEU. -ice o °v .Oiq E � u•Ti t� �rUOd 6.N. d �' C Ea yC0 —•Lp ~ p a A Y CpLO w d dONi yy VCiJ c C Orv. L" dd LTq C. uEC - c cny a. O y�y ��`� N`n _� pLGa..N t uENEi F- Wd AC��p V'dL Y U97z �t Y«•'. �. c6 Fes- y.E ay o'. imm y A «.. Vi qa f. ot y L " T Q. aE.+O YrOy O. N Q d n0 �y ^nd ° is OT Uo0 u v b0 uOVE ° -um `G,�y�t b '^q C � c� REOC U SVYy tTN NY�y pbC U � N'�yY U6 teEr. bs0+.• Vu. r G W p H tp U Crt .yy i2 IG- sS p.W CO�yj A ^ °d LE da Nt z .Y� N...;�vi EoyiH prcd N °N RL Ed Oy J, e.EC.D L noya °n U R> w N c O d u >LL rC.O. r"'R<'c L y 31 �6 rt-AR O ^iOJWL 6�6yY LOndp L L S v H ri'^AY -O N n Y.j W � H S Y N O C a R .D � Ep \�_� 9 V. rn L tO 'pu N -J TyY ..0.b " 6 udd y C L E pZ. v0 = A A • Y % p N •.• 4 L Y d p q �' Zf pr pR or 3 c aM .-R C Vu iu° i u t r p p u o �a uoa C d q � b .m N 2 Aigq N L dy u'OT� 2Lm yam' OI u C °Cn Dui Cq Ly CS L« u qp CR 6n ayy ny ` wrObN .O-.� a0 .9C usi E C d t 3 W�u.- R y 0 0 n E~ C .O .:� L u G y m �' •Oi d 7Z; :,j a d9a aNiN �CdL t✓ _ ?i .�uN y i� « y t` N.da E dG q L m U a `c yFiq— Ldp N O C� Rq aW ut OC tom. d N2C b N °t p AA C c 6 C > L E O ^nS ^?" L V �cvu qY�C q gCq.A O c C LO-2g OCLo. YO�.�..v .' ^^ E�e Rt `5LL y' LY U L F _pp pN A C C L �i' ` PC D440 S0.••• .JLE •.- q R. n' qC® Du 1. 1 C Z U �n L d ra, rao�s� m< `yE uN L 4 QdQY. E Y` i�nLq ME° L ��c JGYO�n O °O "C'uwYaVwq o a q d.C1tyL O. dN.0 °L ON V L9. ,>�� xNtQwcE xyA a� �..c dF6 q 6y L^ gO''pU N' CL.N -c 01G��t CEE .- o e o N •• � E V L.mL V Q OUO C.O ti u AL �� c^ vv La � L gc xL uo Epp ° d V u O N E wv vv a^i E n� y 2 d C� 2 p N V rcu "^ao w 1°v waou A a 2 4 � a° rq A 7y Y u � v Oy e E �c c L C �. Lq� qY d ,v, c a Y ma u� �f E L`�u L�vgi .0 ci iu€ cu^ L 6.A L a �_ w 4 M q, YyvC N cX Lu L L 3 EpE D` a.�i.CpCv'r�- ULa.. ZA O'V C L °YD` Y^ VgmL W.� =Cq Y <NO O E •- i 0 1 N ° 'Ot C dp d y `0 N° V q Y �N u l..nA EE OL NW 6 Y ENW� ffp SON 'p° L LLdq Co.pLd OEEG _ V Q r�Cu. -4 C^ au�i Y O q zl �� J: E Is uLi� uOL C �� L9 V L L G.S. • 4 TC aL+ A X a+ C V a L C O..-. O ^yC Y 6 = L q'O Y at C 00 ^q r q±. r No°f�° gUL4 9AO�L O� C� .4 ly S.0 v Z o J L LoLY O L C �. Lq� qY d OuA AwN. A.LOr d x u� �f E L`�u L�vgi .0 ci iu€ cu^ L a �_ w 4 PCm6 °C.xA L L Yqg a.�i.CpCv'r�- ULa.. ZA O'V C L °YD` Y^ VgmL W.� =Cq Q �• O C 4L N G= M C dp d y `0 N° V q Y �N u l..nA EE OL NW 6 Y � SON i C Uq xC LLdq Co.pLd l nU ,p L.r G� au�i Y N O W ONC zl �� J: E A uLi� uOL C C��y. L9 V L L G.S. ta O0 O ^yC J..T�n 00 ^q r q±. r No°f�° gUL4 9AO�L O� C� .4 ly S.0 Yq A. 7 lid YUY LoLY A iC u o� p1 o u. a q .a- -` -�az Q� a`o amp ev i = °Q. c —3Fr E E E Q. J L uu0 «� _oOP O< �E9GYJ N O O.OAQY aU+ ^+t u Gq ESE 4 _ uNNQ 9 C NQ�.a W � � N Oyi » »Q p - w O = L V u AV pwgg G UYR2" Men —' N.pQn� N s Y U =o aj .n Sp LQwq N� ��w Doi�.i 4 c y d CtI.�IL'� LC3� GfJ Na CJL �p� r.¢ L 6�wdu ..J LU u . q V E Y G v v y C N w i a q q p N9 �. p u > u o.N OEN d;pc ndwC mt —a" CL yY Lz QdLryY- ' C Y C N,a CLa'� a,G1j. EU odc O0. Ly nd EE. .QN qr, d Y .� U^ q CFwi �NyVV< �q 4d r E'FwV d jLU Au+L,. L..� d V�OY� 2 L AU adb �S.�N L'dH dU Nf.,1 Np lbW 3N LC O n GP N LY �y Ud N 6W u G do Al wv dam.« 6V y'w tuu NL iu 3 tiV 6 W c4 cj M aNOG � U �� V aN iaw Y a c °vY rwJ U � V r Tx2 C n p u = N O C cE v E aJ�d ,J om LT U 9 p V q D EcE t U C pO LG = 4 E n �d a . A d q C' V Ca �ww e� pg Y N ay v �v ey a� eE,u e YFi p S U. L O q 0 vyiV m b q 9 ,., JNJ E CF d r s6 y N u d 2Y �'•Y•u CFF B Y Y y D. �C _ r Nd O occ-d Eq Nu nm 4v Wj tam�o NC CL COj` U G « p L w L L a 6 v i r O o i 4 i 1 O 4 U N � � � d 9 L nab N Y y� Y u Q F L u9 ccw Yj w U W p a o O c L1 vx'6 N c maw p o=w 6 aAJ d O K a Q is N C O d V �y O L wV d Y a `oa b V � C .O 4 z� L.i � b 0 '�'• w w A O Y O b Vu LL N N N 1 b N q « L q 3.s =y Yw NO d «e m ac o . qo0 w yL �u dvSY i i.w is � Y L wpm ay Eo u !lq aa' pE wV .ay �L L w O N w N U L= 2-o a c d Nq p o 5 Zi r 4 e. t 9-t 1-21 t N r4-� to.h qN -MA O of uil 10 t 1 ^f t A a r r ' i u e, « x. Y E n o cc T o Y sw A 6 b N N �b Ya a w A oe �nc o ✓ .n 3 w� E ¢CL A o E d C R 6 U N� OC •e n!T V NI 4 Q '`f� gdua V V 6w A t'wO L O1tiA N E'er �n as «a y w p� a � L maul d w a Y ovz �yY v � 4 E A « t dY m � C •�. r nia N c r= 7i. %2 w Ya C .'gyp � N 6 SD Y CL �^C D'U TrtiV y-t cV � a «n •Y 6.A.1 V-0 « `Y R g« � O V lo s ' 1 7 V L � T 4 u v o N 6 C ..o. c U N W � U. Y Y � n L O S +� D• LL OW �N 7y J+w L� E� L Y nN I �� E. O b0 da CC � Lp Uk Z edi .Cli 4 i UA iA �ty d a N Y fi a u v L V GY 4 C A p A E u o a aN '� v4 aV ML Vm C C a aN 4 ^� V AV L Y� Nm Lei b `✓, ~ uV y d L aeu q °� 1-5 d^ a°di9 c r A q lo O d O K a Q is N C O d V �y O L wV d Y a `oa b V � C .O 4 z� L.i � b 0 '�'• w w A O Y O b Vu LL N N N 1 b N q « L q 3.s =y Yw NO d «e m ac o . qo0 w yL �u dvSY i i.w is � Y L wpm ay Eo u !lq aa' pE wV .ay �L L w O N w N U L= 2-o a c d Nq p o 5 Zi r 4 e. t 9-t 1-21 t N r4-� to.h qN -MA O of uil 10 t 1 ^f t A a r r ' i u e, « x. Y E n o cc T o Y sw A 6 b N N �b Ya a w A oe �nc o ✓ .n 3 w� E ¢CL A o E d C R 6 U N� OC •e n!T V NI 4 Q '`f� gdua V V 6w A t'wO L O1tiA N E'er �n as «a y w p� a � L maul d w a Y ovz �yY v � 4 E A « t dY m � C •�. r nia N c r= 7i. %2 w Ya C .'gyp � N 6 SD Y CL �^C D'U TrtiV y-t cV � a «n •Y 6.A.1 V-0 « `Y R g« � O V lo s ' 1 7 V L � T 4 u v o N 6 C ..o. c U N W � U. Y Y � n L O S +� D• LL OW �N 7y J+w L� E� L Y nN I �� E. E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT SATE: June 11, 1986 TO: Cha4rman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: 3rad Fiuller, City Planner BY: Cebra Meier, Assistant Planner a o 1977 —.1 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REVIEW 86-33 - HAYES - A consistency determination between the Foothill' Corridor Interim Policies and a proposal to exp.nd the Cub Tavern located at 8411 Foothill Boulevard, APi: 207- 571 -75. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. burrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - vacant Land; General Commercial South - Residential Condominium Development; Medium (4 -14 du /ac) Residential East - Residential Condosj.nium Development; Medium (4 -14 du /ac) Residential West - Auto Repair Services; : sral Commercial B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Commercial North - Commercial South - Medium (4 -14 du /ac) Residential East - Medium (4-14 du /ac) Residential - West - Commercial r. Site Characteristics: The site is 1.6 acres of land containi;tg e ex-fis-t-fin-9--favern as well as an automotive repair shop. Th: two :usinesses share a paved parking area that is oartialll striped. The southern boundary of the site parallels the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. There is cur') existing along this portion of Foothill Boulevard, however, no parkway improvements or landscaping are present. D. Applicable Regulations: Taverns such as this, operated %n epen en o a res aurant, are conditionally permitted uses within the General Commercial District. However, this use was approved by the County in accordance with the County Zoning ordinance prior to any applicable City Development Codes. Our ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DEPORT June 11, 1986 PR 86 -33 - Hayes Page L records indicate that a CUP was not required by the Cr�,nty. A use legally established prior to the effective 0-4te of the Development Code which did not previously receive a CUP is deemed a "pre- existing conditional use." ouch uses may continue in accordance with Section 17.02.130 ;(Non- Conforming Uses). Alteration, expansiorii or reconstruction of a. building housin a re- ex istin conditiional use must corrily with Section regulating_ non- conformi.,g uses, u —nt +,' such time that a Conditional Use Permit is granted. It iii Staff's opinion, that the proposa? to construct a fence, patio slab and two horsy shoe pits is an expansionlalteration and would require a CUP. Howevef, the Planning Commission may find this proposal to expand not significant enough to warrant a CUP application. II. ANALYSIS: The Foothill Boulevard Interim Policies are provided to help direct design potential for development along Foothill Boulevard and guide the Planning Commission's decision making t process as it relates to consistency with these policies. The intent is to provide direction to the applicant and Staff early in the review process and avoid undue time delays or expZnditures.. • The applicants propose to fence in a portion of the 'area on the east side m.' the existing tavern to develop two horse hoe pits and ` a 150 square foot patio slab (see Exhibit "B") The Note - Conforming Lots and Structures interim policies allow the com`inuance r,;r existing uses and buildings under current conditions, dnd promote consistency of design and technical standards throughout the study area at the time of development, conversion, or redesign.' However, this section deals with new development and /or cciivei+sion of \j residences to new bses and does not address the issue of expansion of existing development. The overall goal for Foothill Boulevard is to establish a high. quality, attractive, and unifying design image reflective of community heritage, and provide a viable setting for a balanced mixture of residential and commercial activities with safe and efficient trafric circulation and access. Based on this goal, the following Interim Policies are applicable: Policy ' Architecture The architecture of new construction shall be sensitive to the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga and relate to nearby structures of communj y significance. Desigr elements may include, but are not limited_ to, river rock /fieldstone walls, exposed beamwork, vine arbors, curved parapet walls, and ccvered walkways or arcades. #.2 e 1--] ""V -g PLANNING COMhIISSION STAFF REPORT June 11, 1986 PR 86 -33 - Hayes Page 3 Comment: Although this is not new construction in the sense of a building or addition, there is the opportunity to provide a vine arbor or tre!lis, over t,�e patio slab (see comments below) .. Further, a 6 ft t wood fence is proposed to enclose the horseshoe pit area. River rock /fieldstone pilasters) could be provided to reflect Community heritage, Policy 2 Pedestrian Urientation Site planning, including building orientation and parking lot configuration, (tali enhance pedestrian connections on - and off -site. A continumis pedestrian systes is required in all new projects with connections between buildings, parking areas, street adjacent sidewalks and transit stopa. Anenities shall be provided such as plazas, shaded seating alcoves, expanded walkways with surface treatment, taxturized pavement across drive aisles, raised planters, trash receptawies, and drinking fountains. In addition, out+coor eating areas are encauraged. Comment: The horseshoe pit is more of a recreational amenity than a plaza. However, a shaded seating area could be created:, by providing a vine covered patio ever. The applicant is proposing picnic tables to encourage ou''dow- eating. Policy 3 Setbacks Regardless of parcel depth, all new development shall provide a winimum 4S fcw" "ttileIng setback wad average streetscoz - :-iducaping G cured from *he ultimate curb face location) on Foothill Boulevard. Comment: The existing structure is located approximately 17 f °et from ultimate curb face. Any new construction should meet or exceed the 4-w foot landscape setback, inr',uding the fence proposal in question (see Exhibit "C "). Policy 4 Landscaping Streetscape landscaping and irrigation shall be regoidred to the extent practical irca-ijunction with substantial reconstruction, renovatio'7 or exterior remodeling of existing structures along Foothill Boulevard involvinc the issuance of a builds ^g permit, ""V -g PLANNING COMMISSIO'j STAFF °REPORT June 11, 1986 PR 86 -33 - Hayes Page 4 Ea Comment: The applicant's proposal is to landscape only along the fence facing Frothill. However, some form of interim landscaping should be provided alongside the existing buil,4ing as well, Photographs of the site will be Presented at the meeting. III. CONCLUSION: In similar cases along Foothill Boulevard the Planning ..om 'csi on has determined this type of expansion is not consistent with the Interim Policies. Further, the Commission has consistently stated in these cases, that it is preferable for the applicants to postpone formal application to expand pending completion of the Foothill Specific Plan. In addition to the above, the Cub is a pre -ext .ing conditional use within the General Commercial District and may require a CUP under Section 17.02.130 of the Development Code. Further, expansions of non- confo- ~ring uses and structures must be reviewed by the City Planner or referrhd to tNe Planning Cwnnission. Lastly, though the site plan issue- �qre -ndt before the Commission this evening, it should be noted that any new construction must comply with the 45- foot building setback.. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determire that this expansion is not consistent with the Inter ;m Policies. However, should the Commission find this proposal consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Interim Policies, the applicant should be directed to �vbmit a formal Conditional Use Permit application for Expansion of a Non - Conforming Use and Structure. Respectfully sub :tted, Brad Buller City ?larner BB:DM:& s Attachments: Property Owner's Letter Applica;W s Letter ExhibT4- 0Afi - Location Map xhlbit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Foothill Boulevard Setback Interim Policies Al F-kcott Murphy To -- Pla.niug Division City of Rancho Cucamonga L, 5 l 86 DATE — Dear Sir: _..,.__ CATE ' I am the legal owner of the property at E411 Foot - 1 hil.1 Blvd., Fancho Cucamonga$ C lifornia�accupiccL by DI)n and Michael Hayes, DHA The Cub, They have adv+,ed me of tLeir plans to ad-' a fenced outside patio thereby enlarging the premises. Permission is granted to make these additions prov- ided they are done in�a substantial', and workmsnlixe i manner in accordance with t:-,,e laws and codes c:f the i i city and other governmental agencies as per our leas I 9Y , T. R. 5hinkle (Owner) If W � N- � � y'�ekr Croup hG •_ �.._•.•-.• 1 6?l&4' -; f „!��c.G-�,.� ec� I - 16-11- i I Ell X U i R-9 - NORTH CITY QF - T rrE�i: P:'�_ V ECHO CTT TCAMo NGA TITI E: %© " F -M,4T. Sri ki.,E. 'I r.lsrya, 4 AC lwz .. NORTH CITY QF - T rrE�i: P:'�_ V ECHO CTT TCAMo NGA TITI E: %© " F -M,4T. Sri ki.,E. 4 a G�l NORTH MY OF RANCHO CUC A�V'VIONGA Tirt�: _��7"� P�1_1 PLANNUNG Urv-s a-4 EXmIBM- e'ov ` r THE Av a-jz� 1 �t 7 � � C NIORTH CITY OF _ UT TrrLl -:- PLANNTrj\� DIi=l>.5M i~.Yi IF4T: LF j INTERIM i POLICIES a, ' A. Genera 1; Requirements: Preliminary ;Review A.1 Prior to processing Development /Design Review applications within the study area the Planning Commission shall conduct a Preliminar_' Revie:v to determine consistency with the Interim Goal and Policies contained herein. The intent is to provide direction to the applicant and staff early in the review process and avoid undue time delays or expenditures. A.2 Submittal requirements for a Preliminary Review shall include a Site Utilization Map showing the relationship of the site to surrounding . property and improvements, a conceptual I Site Plan, and a description of the i proposed use. Additional information may be requested as deemed n^cessary by the City Planrt;r. Time Limits /Extensions A.3 Approval of development proposals, except subdivision maps, shall lapse eighteen (18) months from the date of approval. The intent is to allow early - re- evaluation of projects not yet constructed for consistency with the adopted Foothill Corridor Study or other then current City standards. A.4 Time extensions for any development proposal within the study area subject to a lapse of approval may be 9T-anted, In twelve (12) month increments and not to exceed a total of four (4) years fram the original date of approval, suLJect to any inconsistent provision of State law, and the following findings: a. The proposed land use, project design, and conditions of approval comply with all applicable provisions of the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies; b. • The PY;Ojec:t is consistent with the Policies, standards, and requirements in effect a• the time Of the extension. I c, Compatibility: C. The granting of said time extensio will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious too properties or improvements in the . vicinity. d. Current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions have made it unreasonab'i8 to develop the project prior to this time. A.fi All land use and development proposals Shall be compatible with ultimate uses on surrounding properties, particularly residential uses, and mitigate potential conflicts to the extent practical, IiitiSation M sures may typ4c:ally include, but are not limited to, piaster Planning, transitign of building height, architectural norm and Cansity, 'andscape buffers sound attenuation, reduction of wind turbulence, visual - ,I:rriers and /or grading conditions to disrupt line-of- sight, concerns, and alternative circulation and access. B. Land Use: Tae intent of the following policies is to provide a viable setting for a balanced mixture of residential, rommercial, office, and other activities of community wide significance ^rmpatible with surrounding land uses. General Plan Amendments 8,1 Applications for General Plan Land Use Amendments are discouraged. Prior to approval of any such amendment, however, the Planning Commission shall j make the following findings: a. The proposed amendmant is ,learl can ,, with the intent and l purpose of the interim policies for the = othill Boulevard corridor. b. The proposed land use is compatible with ultimate uses on surrounding property, C. The proposed land use will not create significant traffic or circulation impacts. -i2 d. The proposed land use will not be detrimentr.'i to properties or improvemerts in the vicinity. Development Disc` -icts Amendments 8.2 Development Distrie, boundaries may be considered menif consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element and Interim Policies, and where neces.;ary to achieve more logical and efficient land use and site planning patterns. The intent is to allow flexibility during the Master Flanning process and prcvide a tool to achieve the objectives of the Interim j Policies. 1 Land Use B.3 Current Land Use regulations within the Study Area shall remain in effect, except that the following limitations - shai1 apply during preparation of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor Plan. The Purpose is to avoid land uses Which may have adverse aesthetic impacts, until such time as desiA guidelines and technical standards are establshed to deal with specific areas of concern. A complete list of permitted and conditionally permitted uses is provided on the atta,hed Interim Use Regulations for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. Existinj or previo.,siy approved businesses and buildings shall be allowed to continue under current regulatcry provisions of the City. The following new land uses sljall not be established in - the Office /P, °ofessional and General Commercial Districts o,ithin the Study Area. Expansion of existing uses identified below shall be allowed sbbject to t1,e provisions of the Interim Policies for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor and Development Code Standards, Animal Care Facility With nxterict• kennels, pens, or runs - Cemeteries Contractors Yards - Equipment Rertal Yards - Ice Machines (outdoor) - lini- storage far public use''r Recreation Vehicle Storage Yard - Vehicular Storage Yards I, The followinc new land uses may Fe established in the Office /Professional or General Commercial Dist ices within the Study Area (see attached Interim Use.. Regulations), subject to the approval of a Conditianl bse Permit. - rarpentcr Shop or Cabinet Shop Drug Stores ant, Pharmacies (CUP in DP District only) Nurseries & Garden Supply Stores - Plumbing Shop and Supplies Second Nand Stores and Pawn shops Spiritual'.sts C. Master Planned Bevels mp ent; The purpose of this section .s o provide for integrated development at the earliest possible time in the review pro.ess. Master planring of uefined areas will avoid dsvelopmLnit of single parcels of lane in a man which prevents or p;•ecludes future development of adjacent parcc,ls it, the best way feasible. The specific intent is to eacognize and solve pr^bif,;s before they occur and take advantage of opportuniVies white they exist. Master Plans Required- C.1 ' conceptual Master Plan shall bo required for Planning Commission review in conjunction with development proposals wherever necessary to assure integrated development, enhance harmonious ant orderly development, mitigate site constraints on adjoining proprty and maximize land potential, Boundaries /City Benefit C.2 The area of Master 'Plans shall not be confined -by individual lot line., but determined by logical Planning boundaries and site candtinns as required by the Planning Commission or Ci'J Planner. Master Planning beyond the boundaries of specific project sites is intended to benefit the City by coordinating land use and site planning to enhance opportunities for quality development consistent with the standards for Foothill Boulevard, de esrphasize "strip - commercial" by creating organized groan G of structures and uses, and provide for efficient utilization of land. Content C.3 At a minimum, Master Plans shall indicate conceptual building locations and orientation, overall circulation, points of ingress and egress, parking lot layouts, transit stops, landscaped areas, and pedestrian n:ides, and circulation. In addition, the City Planner may require other information as deemed necessary to assure- consistency with the intent of these policies. D. New Development: The 'Intent of the followi -- Policies 'is to establish a high attractive and unifying des-v' ma a which qualit,, 9 promotes a sense of identity .and reflects community heri tage and to provide for safe and efficient traffic flow and optimum vehicular and pedestrian access within the corridor. Architecture D.1 The architecture of new construction shall be sensitive to the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga and relate to n.arby structures of community significam-R. Design elemenfs may include, but are not limited,to, river rock /fieldstone walls, exposed beamwork- vine arbors, curved parapet walls, and covered walkways or arcades. D.2 Ail applications for new development within the study area shall include a writ' en statement Of architectural intent indicating haw the proect is sensitive to the heritage of' Rancho Cucamonga. Pedestrian Orientation D.3 Sate planning, including building orientation ana parking loft configuration, shall enhance pedestrian connections on- and off -site. A continuous pedestrian system is required in all new projects with connections be— eti buildings, pan-,_ areas, street adjacent sidewalks and transit stops. Amenities shall be provided such is plazas, shaded seating alcoves, expanded walkways with surface treatment, taxturized pavement across drive aisle , raised planters, trash receptacles, and drinking fountains. In addition, outdoor eating areas are encouraged. Combined Access 0.4 Through the master planning process, driveways onto Foothill Boulevard shall be coordinated for consistency with existing City access policies (i.e., 300' driveway separation) to the extent practical, regardless of parcel width. Public Transit D.5 Public transit facilities shall be considered within all master plans,. Convenient pedestrian access shall be . provided from designated transit facilities, such as bus stops. Streetscape Design D.6 Streetscape design elements for all new projects shall be coordinated for consistency with the guidelines for Foothill Boulevard in effect at the time of development. including intensified landscaping with specimen size trees, berming, and meandering sidewalks. In addition, street furniture and alluvial rockscape and monument signs may be •aquired where appropriate. Landscaping D.7 E. Non- Co nformiuq Lots/Structures: Landscaping shall be designed to create visual interest and variety to the streetscape, enhance -building architecture, buffer views of automobiles, screen utilities and service areas, and distinguish pedestrian spaces from vehicular areas. The purpose of this section is to allow continuance of existing uses and buildings under currr t conditions, and promote consistency ar design and technical standards throughout the study area at the time of development, conversion, or redesign. Master Planning E.1 New development and /or conversion of existing residential buildings to a new use is permitted on non - conforming" 1 lots, provided such development is an integral part of a Master p;an development consistent with the Uterim Policies for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor and Development C;.de standards. The boundaries of such a Master Plan shall be determined by the City Planner per policy C.2 abo,te, and should provide for consolidation of substandard parcels. Landscaping Z.2 2ega *dlass of parcel ftth, all new development shall provide a minimum 45' building setback sand average streetscape landscaping tmeasured from the ultimate curb face location) on Foothill Boulevard. E.3 Streetscape landscaping and irrigatior shall be required to the extent prac-i ic;-1 in I,anjun:tion with .. substantial reconstruction, renovation . o^ exterior remodeling of existino structures along Foothill Boulevard inaoivirg the issuance e a building permit. Ll E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 11, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Plannin5 Commission FROM: Brad Boiler, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner c' t �1 R rR Az U�t��> 1977 � SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REVi:EW 85 -83 - EICH A consistency determination between the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies and a proposed �:O -Bay Auto Service Center totaling 6,400 square feet, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, across from San Bernardino Road - APN 201 - 101 -17. I. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is for the Planning Commission to determine the consistency of this project with the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies. The intent of this process is to provide direction to the applicant early on to avoid undue time delays or expenditures. II. BACKGROUND: A. General The site is developed with two rows of office mild ngs, one on each side of the property boundary, totaling 10,148 square feet, the 2,135 square foot China Alley Restaurant that fronts on Foothill Boulevard, and parking areas as shown in Ei;hibit "C ". The rear portion oT the site is vacant where the applicant is proposing to develop a 6,400 square foot auto service center. Foothill Saulpward has been recently widened to V,' ultimate width and a new drive approach installed. Remaining site improvements do not meet current City Standards. B. Surrounding land Use and Zoning_ Areas north of the site are designated as General Commerical District, and consists of existing sinSle family homes. The area west of the site is designated as General Commercial and consists of vacant land, retail use,. Commercial nursery, and a gas station. TNe area east of the site is designated as General Commercial District with an existing restaurant, Sycamore Inn. The area south of the site is designated as General Commercial District with existing restaurants and other commerical uses. C. 8nii,:able Regulations: Major auto repair (engine cork, muffler shops, painting body work and upholstery is subject to ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PR 85 -83 - EICH June 11, 1986 Page 2 11 a Conditional Use Permit; whereas, minor repair (tune-ups, brake, batteries, tires) would be subject to Development /Design Reivew.. III. ANALYSTS: The key issue for the Planning Commission's cons"de`ration is the compatilibity of tie proposed use with surrounding properties and businesses. A. Land Use /Compatibility. The prop ^led use is substantially different thaii ;he adjacent office, restaurant, aue ,L— dential uses. Automotile repair could potentially create noise, vibration and aesthetic impacts. The proposed building orientation would screen service bays from the south, east ar-+ west. Mitigation measures may typically Include, but are n. limited to, Master Planning, trdnsitian 0 building height, architectural form and density, landsca;,ii buffers, sound attenuation, visual barriers sand /or gradOg conditions to disrupt lime -cf -sight concerns. The details of any mitigation measures fcr the potential adverse impacts could be reviswed at the Conditional Use Permit process. B. Site Plan /Circulatiri, The prc,osed project offers an oppportunity to �pgrada the existing on -site. improvemants. In particular, the proposed site plan indicates a 'complete reconstruction of the main parking lot to provide sufficient parking end adequate circulation. The addition of the auto service building and the redesigning oY the parking area would create op;artunities for plaza areas, and continuous pedestrian system consistent with 'he Interim Policie-. C. Streetscape /Landscaping. The proposed project provides an :,pportunit$ to upgrade the landscaping and streetscape scheme for the entire parcel consistent with the goals of the Inte "im " Policies. This could include, but not be linnited to, intr;sified landscaping with spocimen size trees, berming, and mea.:dering sidewalks. In addition, street furniture, allrivial rockscape, and parking lot shade trees may be required. D. Architecture. The proposed elevations indicate only a small T.r—tio--q-or the building receiving architectural treatment. Larne expanses of ur,- corned stucco walls are proposed. The Interim Policies require design elements which reflect community heritage such as riven rock /field stone walls, exposed beam work, vine ar!ors, curve parapet walls, and covered walkways or arcades. This proposed project also provides an opportunity to upgrade the existing office ane restaurant buildings. In the past, the Commission has requireo upgrading of existing buildings as a part of any development �r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT" PR 85 -83 - EICii June 11, 1985 Page 3 application. The Planning Commission may provide direction to the applicant regarding the extent of the upgrade of the w3 stirs buildings (photographs will be available at the meeting). V. RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Canmission finds that the proposed use is consistent with the Interim Policies, the applicant should be directed ;o address the issues discussed herein as part of their formal application. Re c ally swXKii ? ad 1ler f City Planner 86;NE.ko Attachments: Suwery of development laole Exhibit "A" -- Location Nap Exhibit "8" - Area Plan Map Exhibit "C" Site Utilization Map Exhibit "O" Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit "EC* Proposed Ele*atians Exhibit "F" ti Der Plan 0701 -02- o 6= 11-86 PC Agenda.o G:vim.. 9 CLX JC1 1977 PART 11 UNIFORM APPLICATION NONRESIDENTIAL PRO" d'C SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT TABU Project Name ::Auto service center /commercial Reference File No.- Location : 8353 Foothill Blvd. (Staff Use Only) General Plan Development District Z'_' PROJEC'P_AREA' Gross (Intl. area to centerline of abutting streets): 98800 s.f. acres: 2.27 Net (exclusive of dedication for major external and secondary streets): 90200 acres: 2.07 ]••:9 uv� +jry,(.h�F i•.0 \yp.h '. ... .- , 4. L i. ..,_•'.+.'..: `{ "4. :`AREA piSTRIBUTION (68Eed�csn etAM 13.*- RESISO.IrT , c. >�'� °�O OFIVEi'A EA. Building Coverage 18550 s.f. 21 % Landscape Coverage 17349 s.f. 19% Vehicblar Area (Intl. parking): 54301 s.f. 60% FLOOR`AREA DISTRIBt3T10:V BY PFinP�SE USE(Based on Net ea)��,,w Area of Building Pad No. of Stories Gross FloorAraa(sq. ft.) Proposed Use 5267 s.f, new 2 6267 s.f, auto service 1h -4d s.f.existing 1 10148 s.f. c mmerci.al 2133 existing 1 2135 s.L.. restaurant PARKA a?' „ r i s Y type of Use Parking Ratio # of Spaces Required # of spaces Provide commercial. 1/250s.f. 41 41 restaurant 1 /100s.f. 21 21 auto service 3.62 /bay 23 25 Total No. of Parking Spaces Required: 85 Total No. of Parking Spaces Provided: 87 No. of Compact Spaces 0 Compact Space to Total Space : 0 1[__ I K ilii e �. 4 riJ �- •, M v i 4 � `J. /9lMl•J as .�° 4 t .. H A r 41� Fr 4 mix � ` - r, i r, G p, L FI /0 X �I MOO 1 / �6T F5r1C(� = 2D Pr /z ( - wo Moat k� 1 NORTH CITY OF ITEM. RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE- ff=X�-�� PLANNING DIVI.SIoN EXHIBIT- SCALE,_,�_ 12 0 11 tz P CITY OF RANCHO C JTCq M© WA, PLANNING DIVISION n 1 �-r 0 NORTH ITEM: TITLE = . EXHIBIT,•. SCALE- "! 'r-ia KA l_J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ra te: .Turn ?, 1 ^FF `moo: ''er-+Fr.- of tr^ ri, 1+nirr Ccrnission rrcq -: r311 hc'lley, CcfiUIWJ ty Servic es Tic pa rin En . ry: Jjr,i`enecetti, Sssistant $ark Planner Nt ect: Pe.n l Parl, - Pest Extension Conceptual Flex; s n Abstract: The rerrl Park - ;zest Extension corcel:tual raster plan 3s beinE subnattcd ty the Cc 2auit5 Cervices t:epartr:ent ioZ* rel -itV and cmuert. BACFGRC ,r,. The Ee yi Bart Hest ratensicn, Wbich is ari=xi"tely IC acres in size, will ev.e_;d the existii!g Eea3;1 Psrl, facility tc cari;eli�, htie -t, tLis tell include ti a Let-:;rolitan Water Distri:t ri €bt of way. The cencept;al T_arl raster ,plan, see attac1�.,erst exhibit A, i_ the Tro6uct of the neighbcrin€, resiuents and ra=rzers oz the COL unity SerG1ces Departvent. This raster plan includes tl:e foilcwInU uses which are consistent with the existirg park facilitie& to the east: 2 liLhtee? soccer fielft, picnicl:inF, sae play arec with FlaY equilreLt, rest rGCts, volleyball, basl-etball, an exercise course and arr-le or cite rarkin£,. T'TCCt%'R:PATICII: 1. To review and corn,ent on the conceptual Eeryl Park—West extension raster plan arcs; 2. To proviee, dixecticn to the Director of Coatsunity ervrcE3 to proceed to City CoanciI. I ITEM J �� � - GYM 1` +•`+f'-• j ~ 1..�./ -^ -� '• •. O ltt ca +I 1 ��s�,,!�'\�, Wit• •� � G' =ULS vtwwvvJ L�JLFj U Ll CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 11, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Blane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM n1% Z ? 14,7 f I I INTRO91ICTION It is my 1J,.asure as the Senior Design Engineer, to address the Planning CommisF',-1!x,1v?th legards to th^ Capital Improvement Program. In my report I`ll endeavor to address 4 r areas: 1. 1986 -87 Estimated Revenues 2. Basic Elements of the Capital Improvement Program 3. Review Progress of the Street Improvement Program, 1985 -86 4. Review the Major Elements of the Proposed 1986 -87 Street and Drainage Budget II. REVENUE SOURCES The City presently has (9) nine basic revenue sources available to the Capital Improvement Program. These include with their 1986 -87 revenue estimates: Gas Tax $938,919.00 TDA Article 8 and Article 3 $884,276.00 Systems Fees $1,800,000.00 Drainage Fees $800,000.00 SB 300 $215,000.00 FAU (Pending New Appropriation) Block Grant (CDBG) $200,000.00 Beatification Fees $800,000.00 continued... TOTAL REVENUE $5,948,000.00 ITEM K. 11 of �.aff p o9'am _ Co ,ss� Jaent City, planning it l imp r =� `jj_thi%l the capital meat Re' 2 ue sou eVeloP t of s_ ?age as to th t n Fees Q. A 4 ae ation occur ment , .4ith ana aaea,o is aodn C }fin a fee �e� ups susect to Z R st co orai deVeI \\resultant redo d FRj re tea that thes Sys s :When c?d a Gpg� an eXPec , �ae Pm nt �s re be note aeyi le co, co'.� n9 year,at,on ,jith 19$6 "g' �' t also It us c n may be reduced �n r State appropr udg Priations d is a tw° afia e Sg o{ the pro9' x Qro9ram consist the1s cond year e Cap'. Mal ImproVemer_ �yith pr'. 0rity ill • gRS1G pRgaS elements to the itainate a\ nuis n st rma S. ins+ The four V ements to _I nd 90 f Stree all ntr o�u11ity of: id• im {fi dr ,11% siste -&rAtythin the 1• prJ en t° traffic' eXi al tra, Ponta °l Wi ain� win, r genet l flood im�nation- a fo era 2, Vidi'n9 gen d to haZav liatl a tQma g, providing for directe cuiVert across piths have ation tention �s ear box on RVenue ld and the demon Elimin St at e last y d Wils Rfch�ba in9 °f Storm all Naiard ssity our that wit�ll de Ran Fo °t far the me ma Cr from �emeals ta Of to be not uG� ed at; tlelima Lom4leted s of Rl Ad RVenue affIc � Val beeD ly ye beeTraF tic ` p Hans hue CA bridge ian'' {o t onhl Fact 'Pr 5 ° ty l °Gam} Cre� comply ti 9hi an eC is rub d n9 p °� rn ucti 011 ressl draiun are t` m b n9 ad aatache 4roJeCts �n 'Pros mainten is of the e ganya °,esenti� t �7ee around repot are P n the �� 9• ity cent ea the fl5tor streeditions ith Maintenance and most G ��e lh vo ru a to i� yea the 1{ ll °Wing c ecnn Street SysterVey 'Streets sur Pa till" w of t 125 ro les ui Sys' eo�edt continued''• Planning Commission Staff Report Re; Ca ctai Improvemntt Ffoi oi; Page 3 19.8% of Streets in very poor condition 15.2% of Streets in poor condition 26.2% of Streets in fair condition 16.5% of Streets In good condition 22.2% of Streets in new or very good condition Froca this survey an initial estimate of $5,000,000.00 it indicated to bring our arterial and collector street system back to an overall good condition and $1,800,00M.) needed to maintain the remainder of the system in a goon or fai; condition. Projections for the next five years would straw similar budgets with a shrinking of the reconstruction backlog and a gradual increase in annual maintenance to about $2,000,000.00 annually. Please remember that this does not include the local street syste . Surveys of the local street system are proposed for this next fiscal year along with a computerized r+aintensnce strategy for the entire street system. Drainage The Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan prepared by L.D. King in 1931 is our guide sheet for storm drain improvements in the established area of Alta Loma and Cucamonga. The 1981 update indicated an initial need for $40,000,000.00 in facilities yet to be constructed. The new Etiwanda drainage Galan indicates an additional $5,000,000 90 to $10,000,000 worth of facilities to be constructed in the areas east:: of Etiwanda Avenue. In the past year we have seen the completion of the Alta Loma storm drain, and the first section of the Beryl - Hell -.r storm drain. An estimated $3,500,000.00 was expended fcr these 4wo facilities. Designs have been performed for the first major Etiwanda drains for East and Etiwanda Avenues between Highland and Summit. Funding sources for construction of these drains remains limited. Plans are presently under way for the Baker Arrow storm drain. Preliminary studies have also been performed for the Turner - Hermosa drainage systems. Beautification This is the first year that major beautification efforts have been able to be performed. This is due to the recent addition of a Landscape Architect to Staff. Improvements to Base Line east of Carnelian and Carnelian from Base Line to Banyan have been recently completed. Plans are in preparation for major beautification projects for portions of Base Line, for Archibald Avenue parkways and for Haven Avenue medians. continued... — e5 Planning Commission Staff Report Re: Capital Improvoment Program �\ Page 4 IV REVIEW OF STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, 1985 -86 We currently have 28 projects in active design, awaiting authorization to bid or in construction. A complete list of these projects entitled "Street and Drainage Improvements 1985 -86, Projects la Progress" follows this section. A brief analysis of the project list would show estimated expenditures for the various program elements as follows: Traffic Safety and Facilities Signals $770,000 Bridges Railroad Crossings $444.000 TOTA" 1,339,000 26% Recon,,truction, Rehabilitation, and Maintenance S1rdewaiks $100,203 Maintenance projects $830,000 Major Rehab„ Recon., & Widenirgs TOTAL $2 032,372 2,962,13 581 Drainage Facility Storm Drains $285,870 6% Beautification $503,876 10% GRAND TOTAL $5,087,321 k"' 7 -- it 40 1 i STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROvEMENTS 1985 -86 Projects in Progress Project Limits Budget Fund ' 1. Turner Ave. Widening Feron to A.T.S.F. RR $216,912 CDBG i 2. North Town Phase IV Acacia, Belmont, & Bth $201,59.? CDBG 3. Archibald Ave. Sidewalks Foothill to Base Line $80,203 TDA Art 3 & Beautification 4. Archibald R.R. Crossing S.P.R.R. Crossing $25,000 Fed 203 & Systems 5. Grove Ave. R.R. Project A.T.S.F. Crossing $294,362 Fed 203 & Systems 6. Rochester R.R. Project A.T.S.F. Crossing $33, n" Fed 203 & Systems 7. Archibald R.R. Crsg. Pads A.T.S F. Crossing $88,000 Fed 203 & TDA Art 8 B. Arrow & 9th Reconstruction Archibald to Vineyard $345,000 Systems 9. Base Line Sidewalks Hermosa to Ivy $20,000 Beaut. 10. Lemon Ave. Recon. & Bridge Archibald to Hermosa Widening - Joint and Alta Loma Creek $363,000 Gas Tax 11. Archibald Widening /S.D. Lemon to Banyan $437,000 Gas Tax 12. Grove Ave. Widening & Signal Modification - 8th to Foothill $650,000 Systems 13. Hillside Rd. Widening & Storm Drain 'Designs) Archibald to Malachite $30,000 Gas Tax 14. Hermosa Ave.. Widening & Victoria to 19th Hamilton St. Extension Deer Canyon to Hermosa $445,000 Systems 15. Local St. Reconstruction Gas Tax/ Phases 1 & 2 Central Cucamonga $330,000 Redev. 16. Local Street Maint. Phases I & 2 Alta Loma Area $155,000 Gas Tax 17. Traffic Signals (5 Loc.) Vineyard & 9th $370,000 TDA Avt 3 Auk Base Line & Beryl Arrow & Hellman Haven & Church Haven �& /Lemon /C_. "6 Budget $100,000 $180,000 $83,000 $105,870 $30,000 $321,300 $68,545 $40,000 $1,659 $2,312 $70,060 $5,087,321 Ilk Projects_in Frogress tcont� Protect Limits 18. Traffic Signal Archibald & 6th 1S. Highland Ave. Widening Alta Loma Ck. @ & Bridge Reconst. @ Cambridge 20. Baker Arrow Storm Drain 8th to Foothill' & Street Reconst. Baker to Cuc. Channel (Designs) 21. Etiwanda Storm Drains East, Etiwarda (Designs) Higwrand & Summit 22. East Ave. Reconstruction Highland to Summit (Designs) 23. Carnelian Landscaping Base Line to Banyan t 24. Base Line Beautification Various Locations t` 15. Archibald Beautification 4th to Base Line r (Designs) 26. Archibald Underground Foothill to Base tine 2i. Foothill Blvd. Grove to East Ave. Design Element 28. Haven. Beautification 4th to Wilson Medians TOTAL WORK IH PROGRESS /C_. "6 Budget $100,000 $180,000 $83,000 $105,870 $30,000 $321,300 $68,545 $40,000 $1,659 $2,312 $70,060 $5,087,321 Planning Commission Staff Report Re: Capital Improvement Program Page 7 V- PROPOSED 1986 -87 STREET AND DRAINAGE BUDGET We propose for 1986 -87 continuing to completion those projects Cl!rrently in progress as well as starting projects are listed in the following list 28 new projects. The new entitled "Proposed 1986 -87 Street and Drainage Budget. The project list includes basic element expenditures as follows: Traffic Safety Signals, and Signal coordination hardware, Traffic Projection Study $826,500 Railrsuad Crossings $200,000 TOTAL $1,026,500 14% Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Maintenance Maintenance Projects and PMS Surveys $917,330 Rehabl., Recon., and Widenings $1,02),750 TOTAL $2,125,080 29% Drainage Facility Storm Drain Designs and Constructions $1,049,500 TOTAL $1,049,500 14% Miscellaneous Expenditures Corporation Yard $505,419 Reimbursements to Development $100,000 City wide bench mark survey $150,000 City wide aerial mapping $200,000 TOTAL $955,419 13% Beautification Medians $1,400,300 Parkways 710,211 Undergoundings 122,328 TOTAL $2,232,839 30% GRAND TOTAL $7,389,338 It is noted that the Grand Total for the Proposed 1986 -87 Budget exceeds the estimated revenue source as fellows: $7,389,338 5,948,000 1,441,388 :systems and Beautification fees currently held by the City will be used to make up this difference if needed. and planning for carryover of some An attempt to over program projects enables the City to take advantage of unexpected revenue source and grant,by activating ready to bid projects sitting an the shelf.) l "9 PROPOSED 198687 STREET & DRAINAGE BUDGET Proposed Projects Project Limits Budget Fund 1. Base Line Widening & Resurfacing Hellman to Archibald $?4L,000 Gas Tax 2. Base Line Signal Inter- connect, Time Base Coordination $50,000 TDA Art 8 3. Ct1 Trans Sig;als on at Archibald $74,000 TOA Art 8 i*oothill at Vineyard inc. above at Turner $47,500 4. Traffic Proj. Update City -Wide $25,Qn0 TDA Art 8 5. ROiber Pads @ A.T.S.F. Carryover TDA Ert 8 IT Crossing 6. Archibald Ave. Inter - coAnect, Time Base Coordination \?5,000 TDA Art 8 7. Corporation Yard Acqusition $506,4'9 TDA Art 8 8. Base Line Rd. Recon. Etiwanda to I -15 $37,500 TDA Art 8 (Designs Only) 9. Archibald Realignment & Recon. 19th to Highland $143,250 TDA Art 8 10. Banyan St. Extension Archibald to E/o EIR & Design Only Alta Loma Ck $55,000 TDA Art 8 11. Amethyst St. Imp. 19th to Orange $37,000 TDA Art 8 Design & EIR it 12. Amethyst Ave. Recon. 19th to Fth. Fire Stn. $115,000 TDA Art 8 13. Preventative Maint. Variois Streets $130,000 SB 300 Slurry Seal 14. Pavement Rehab. Local Streets $262,330 SB 300 15. Hillside S.O. & Recon. Archibald to Malachite $239,000 Systems 16. ROW Acq. Archibald Ave. 19th to Highland $51,000 Systems 17. Beryl St, Widening Lemon to 665' North $65,000 Systems 18. City -wide Benchmark Survey City -wide $150,000 Systems a i �j 16.. a Project Limits Budget Fund 19. City -wide Aerial Control City -wide $200,000 Systems Flight 20. Vineyard Rehab. Arrow to Foothill $170,000 Systems 21. Ramona Avenue Victoria to 19th $75,000 Systems 22. Arrow St. Rehab. Archibald to Turner $315,000 Systems 23. Pavement Mgmt. 4'uj-vey Local Streets $40,000 Syster:s & Computer Tie to PIS System 24. Archibald Ave. Widening S.P. RR Crossingg Carryover 25. Grove Ave. t 8th at 8th ST. ' aaryover Signal & R.` Crossing 26. Grove Ave. 'Widening 8th to Foothill Carryover & Signals 27. Hermosa Widwing & Victoria to 19th Carryover Hamilton St. Deer Canyon School to Hermosa 28. Milliken Grade Separation A.T.S.F. RR Crossing $200,000 System8 (Design) 29. Dev. Reimbursements City -wide $100,000 Systems 30. Traffic Signals Base Line & Amethyst Archibald & 9th Base Line & Alta Cuesta Haven & 4th (112) $305,000 Systems 31. Base Line S.D. (Design) Etiwanda Line 5 -3 ,35,000 Drainage 32. Hellman S.D. (Design) Monte Vista to Cuc. C,;. $162,500 Drainage 33. Turner - Hermosa Foothill to North $741,000 Drainage Drainage System of 19th 34. Rochester Avenue A.T.S.F. RR Crossing Carryover 35. East Ave. Reconstruction Highland to Sum;nit $500,000 Systems and Storm Drain Drainage 35. Base Line Beautification Various Locations $509,650 BF -aut. 37. Archibald Avenue Beautifica 4th to Foothill $175,561 reaut. *ion 38. Haver, Beautification 4th tv Wilson $1,400;300 Seaut. Medians Project Limits Budget Fund 39. Hermosa Avenue Victoria to 19th $100,000 Beaut. Undergrounding 40. Etiwanda Rock Curbs To Be Determined $25,O00 Beaut. TOTAL OF PROPOSED WORKINGS $',,3$9,33$., ®0 9 Planning Commission Staff Report Re; Capital Improvement Program Page 10 8I CLOSING COMMENTS In closing it is noted that in almost every year since irLorporatipn that the Capital Improvement program bas nearly doubled in size. it takes much imagination and maximum effort to accomplish the mammoth task of completing plans and contract documents to allow for the spending of these funds and the building of these improvements. The new project list seems a machine gun targetting an entire horizon of needs within the community. Funding is available to do improvements within all of the element areas of the Capital Improvement Program and therefore the staff approach in formulating the list as it presently appears. As a staff advisor I would welcome the Commission's input as to prioritization of effort with regards to the project list. ThF list is very long and with current staffing the opportunity for those projects falling late on the list to carryover to next year is great in spier- of ail efforts to avoid such occurrence Should there be projects desired by the Commission rlich are not inr,fuded in the present list those can be added yet to do so will eliminate ti"q existing funding balance. A Project deletion should be considered .;,.an adding any new projects. Ps part of this year's list of new projects the acquisition of additional computer software and field data collection is proposed to automate our street maintenance efforts. The Pavement Maintenance Program is anticipated to play a major role in determining which streets will be addressed for maintenance and reconstruction in the future, thus tailoring the project selection currently performed by staff to maximize the dollar re'..ur, for our dullar investment into such workings. The bench mark surveys for city wide survey controls and the accompanying aerial flights for city wide contour and topological mapping will also provide assistance in prioritizing storm drain construction and will provide better control in determining drainage areas. These last items should provide a major augmentation to the ongoing base mapping and geobase mappin; presently in progress by the Building and Manning Divisions of our Community development Departments. �'ajor beautification efforts along thrre of our communities major streets will provide a major upgrading to the aesthetics of our City. I believe I can speak with pride that Rancho Cucamonga is making major growth leaps in all areas of capital development making the community safer, more convenient and a more attractive place to live and work. Respectfully submi ted, %- 4� LBH :BF :bc 4-11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING PPPRG:ft OF THE 1986 -87 PROGRAM FOR CtUNITY *M "T'nVENfENTS, CONSIE FING OF MAJOR STREET AND DRAINAGE, ,.,,» ," IC SIGNAL AND BEAUTIFICATION PROJECTS WHEREAS, on the 11th day of June, 1986, the RanLao Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the attached proposed Capital Improvements Program; and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission concurs in the recommended program as proposed; a,-1 Plan. WHEREAS, the proposed �r,jgram conforms to the elements of the General FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: Find that the attached Program of Community Improvements consisting of Street, Drainage, Beautification and Traffic Signals are in conformance with the General Plan of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 2: Recommends approval of the attached proposed Program to the City Lounci of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for its adoption. SECTION 3: Further recommends that said Program be reviewed and updated on an annual basis as a part of the City budgetary process. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS Ilth DAY OF June, 1986. ,PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis E. stout, ., airman ATTEST. Brad Buller, Ueputy secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commissior, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adoptec by the Fanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regulr-r meeting of the Planning Commission held on the lith day of June, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NGES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSE:;T: COMMISSIONERS: d