HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/09/10 - Agenda PacketMg-FOR
r
r_
AiL
aTlY OF
RANCHO
PLATNTNI�)U cQ,-�,L7vj SSION
AGE 1
WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 1986 7;00 P.m.
U0116 PARK G }MKUKMY CENTUR
8163 BASE LINER
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
L fledge of Allegiance
IL Swearing in Ceremony By City CIerk for Peter Tolstoy i
1IL Roll Cali
Commissioner Barker Commissioner Stout
Commissioner Chitiea— Commissioner Tolstoy —
Commissioner McNiel'�`�
N. Announcements
V. Consent Calendar
The following Consent Ca' -,dar fte.ms are expected to be routine I
and non-controversial. Thi ;t will he acted on by the C rimissfon at
one time without discussimt Tf anyone has concerti oJer any item, {
it should be removed for d &,% assign. !
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 86 -16 - O.T. PARTNERS - The development of a
15,000 square foot office building on .85 acres of lard in the
Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) located at the northwest
corner of Utica Avenue and Civic Center Drive - APN 208-
062 -06.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT- FOR DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 85 -39 - DAVIES - The development of our (4
industrial buildings totaling 19,500 square feet an 1.86 acres
of land in the General, Industrial area (Subarea 3) located or
the north side of 8th Street, south side of Feron Boulevard at
the south end of Helms Avenue - APN 209- 03 -55.
C. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIO'�dAL USn PERM T 84-22
HIGHLAND COMt41UMYY CHURCH - The proposed master
Plan for the development ofof a 6,4006,400 square foot church and
two 2,250 square foot accessory buildings s❑//on 3.5 acres of land
in ie y wz Reside +t l District d2� oiiana8) l cl' e201t21 e
sou wes corner o c:n zan an g 1
08,
.j
IV,
D. TIME EXTENSION FOA rIVE TRACT 128,20
Ti
HIG .
. HlitGF 1. - A proposed custom lot
subvidn to create 16 lots -on about 4.1 acres: of landin the
Low Residential Development Diz-41--t ('�-,-4 dkk/sc), located at
the southwest corner of Jasper Street mi'il Hi0land Avenue -
APN'201= 214-09.
E. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13022 (WEST) - THE WILLIAM
_-
LYON COMPANY AeWew OK new house plan for the 4500
1 j
Series for Tract 13022, a recorded residential subdivision,
including 275 single family lots on 44.1 net acres within the
Victoria Planned Community, located on the west side of
Milliken Avenue, north of Vie Southern Pacific Railroad -
APN 202-211-13, 38, 41, and 42; 202-221-27.
VL Publie Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which concerned
individuaLo- Way voice their, opfnioll of the reh-ted project. Please
wait to b'D''recOgnized by the Chairman and address the commission
�y stating Your name and oddress. All sucrt opinions shall, be
"*t.iited to 5 minutes per individual for each
project.
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9995-
HARDCASTLE - A division- of 15.0, acres into I parcel and a
remainder parcel in the Very Low (1-2 du /ac) and Estate
Residikial. (0-1 du/ac) Development Districts, located on the
north side of 23rd Street, east of Eliwanda. Avenue - APN
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9955 -
B.CZ. DEVELOPMENT -jNC - A division of 1.4.Ur3 -acres into
7 i)arceit; in the inidtitrIf parlr Dlstrlct, Subarea 7, located
between Arrow Highway and Civic Center Drive, and between
,Red Oak, Street and White Oak Avenue - APN 209-351-42, 43,
.A, and 45.
VIIL New Business
H. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-09 MODIFIQLTIOil - BIXBY -
The request to add an optianal truck joadjrg_Ut%!k -faeflity ff)r
each building within Phase I development, located on the
north side of 5th Street, between Milliken Avenue and
Pittsburgh Street - APN 229-261-$8, 59.
1. MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-10 - BROOKS - Appeal
of staff's decision denying the_InstaUatron _0fa satellite dish
antenna Within the rear yard area of a single family residence
loca(<d at 6287 Sapphire Street - APN 1062-471-48,
f;
- u a 47
y
VEL Commission Business
IS, Public Comments
i
This is the time and place for the general public to aft.ess tta "V,
Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not
already appear on this agenda.
X. Adjournme ?
The Planning Commission has adoptA AdministWiue Regulatioas
that set an YI p.m. adjournment time. If items jo beyond that
time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission.
I
, VICINITY MAP
i
SPHERE OF ItiFCU %IVIsE 5 j
J t i
IHIL tSID j l
WIL
s
BANYAN y
W rs a �_ FQ 1lH FR_ SWAY k
�H:EGEiL ND
i
JVICT RIA +
.. 1- - - - - -_ ._- - - - --_
4
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMON(f"
R{
E
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14014GA
STAFF RE PORT
V �
September 10, 1986 1977
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission . I
Brad Buller, City planner
Chris Westman, ASs stant Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -16 -
OR' eve opment a a , , square aot
afrie`e u1 1ng on .86 acres of 1,nd in the Industrial
Park District (Subarea 7), located at the northeast corner
of Utica Avenue and Civic Cenzbr Drive.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approva; of negative Declaration.
B. Surrounding Land Use a „d Zoninq•
North - Office, Industrial Park (Subarea 7)
South Office, Industrial Park (SubarLms ?)
East - Office, Industrial Park (Subarea 1)
West - Office, Industrial Park (Subarea 7)
C. Genera's Plan Designations:
Proiect Site - Industrial Park
North w Industrial Park
South - Industrial Park
East - Industrial Park
West - Industrial !Park
D. Site Characteristics: The site is a vacant parcel located at r
t e fort eastern 1rltersectisn of Civic Center Drive and Utica
Avenue, Lot 10 of the Office /TPnnis Industrial Center. The
site is rough graded and improvements on Utica Avenue and Civic
Center Drive are fully conpleted with the exception of a
driveway.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The proposed project is intended for speculative
office `ause, and the Proposel architecture meets the quality
desired for an office complex. Upon approval of a Negative }
Declaration, the City Planner will grant final approval of the f
project based on conditions recommended by the design and F
Technical Review Committees,
r
ITEM A
•
V �
September 10, 1986 1977
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission . I
Brad Buller, City planner
Chris Westman, ASs stant Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -16 -
OR' eve opment a a , , square aot
afrie`e u1 1ng on .86 acres of 1,nd in the Industrial
Park District (Subarea 7), located at the northeast corner
of Utica Avenue and Civic Cenzbr Drive.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approva; of negative Declaration.
B. Surrounding Land Use a „d Zoninq•
North - Office, Industrial Park (Subarea 7)
South Office, Industrial Park (SubarLms ?)
East - Office, Industrial Park (Subarea 1)
West - Office, Industrial Park (Subarea 7)
C. Genera's Plan Designations:
Proiect Site - Industrial Park
North w Industrial Park
South - Industrial Park
East - Industrial Park
West - Industrial !Park
D. Site Characteristics: The site is a vacant parcel located at r
t e fort eastern 1rltersectisn of Civic Center Drive and Utica
Avenue, Lot 10 of the Office /TPnnis Industrial Center. The
site is rough graded and improvements on Utica Avenue and Civic
Center Drive are fully conpleted with the exception of a
driveway.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The proposed project is intended for speculative
office `ause, and the Proposel architecture meets the quality
desired for an office complex. Upon approval of a Negative }
Declaration, the City Planner will grant final approval of the f
project based on conditions recommended by the design and F
Technical Review Committees,
r
ITEM A
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
September 10, 1986
DR 86 -16 O.T. Partners
Page 2
B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee h,,�s
rec:ommen a -a-PP-r-0-v-a-T---oT tha project with the foilowilr +g
conditions, which the developer has agri;ed to:
The pavement treatment for the pedestrian walk
from the proposed ais'se to the tenniz pedestrian
walk should be consistent with the approved design
for the Office Tennis Executive Center MastsNr Plan
(other approved projects).
2. The proposed plaza surface treatment wall be
continued from the plaza to the drive Aisle'
crossing.
3. Parkway street tree planting and parking lo-6 trees '
shall be consistent with the approved Master Plan
for the Office Tennis Executive Center.
4. Tree wells shall be provided between parking
stalls at a rate of 1 tree well per 4 parking
spaces as shown in Exhibit "B ".
S. Increase the, parking lot landscape finger area at
the south `end of the proposed pedestrian drive
F aisle (crossing, incorporating specimen size
tree(s) and plaza area surface treatment as shown
in Exhibit; "B".
C. Environmental Assessment. review and completion of Part I and
art o the nitia ' tudy, staff has found no significant adverse
1' environmental impacts related to the development of the proposed
project.
III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a
egative ec aration for DR 86 -16.
Re ectfully s iitted,
r
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB: Col: ko
Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Map
Exhibit "B" Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Elevations
Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "E" - Landscape Plan
'I
I
slit",
ZA
r
� U
zo v
y S
i /yeti AA�
O A
O
t
6
-
� y \
W
O
C
F.
O
1
zo
rl
r
m
U
\
Spy4
vv-g�o -ffe F5- - 1jt7"' � �
r-
c u° 9 i■ Z= if °•r °K
Q
� ■. i.0
f
f ( K 6 OvYS
� � w O { r { ► xSMY
rl
r
m
U
\
'j
z
vv-g�o -ffe F5- - 1jt7"' � �
it -L4
"77
fit
t3 uj
-
%*
r-,*hPvlr
1, 10
lu
an
� 111\ 5
X Nir =.yralvvl,v vUi tilylviliv.M 'CAI,fp�,
STAFF REPORT
f C
C 5
0
197
DATE: September 10, 1986
T4: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-39 -
e eve opmen o our industrial uz lUs
to-tall ng 19,5GO square feet on 1.86 acres of land in the
General Industrial District (Subarea 3) located on the
north side, of 8th Street, south side of Feron Boulevard,
at the south end of Helms - APR 209-03 -55
I. PROJECT AND SITE OtSCRIPTION:
A. Action P.eguested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration
B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - Construction yard; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea
3).
South - A.T. & S.P. Railroad; Industrial Specific Plan
(Subarea 3).
East - Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 3).
West - Chaffey College Skill Center; Industrial Specific
Plan (Subarea 3).
C. General Plan Designations: -
Proje Site - General industrial.
North - General Industrial.
South - General Industrial.
East - General Industrial.
West - General Industrial.
D. Site Characteristics : There are no structures or significant
vege anon an the project site. Curb and gutter have been
improved on the site; however, parkway improvements are still
required.
ITEM B
7
I
1
I
k- ,-
LI
"S" STAFF
PLANNING GO"
o
September IUavies
�?
DR 85 -39 -
Page 2
II. IS. request) Environmental Assessment
i, rr ect's
Tt,e applicar. , four industria1osed
p, General construction �� The propo5ed p ecific
square feet.
Industrial Sp
or 1-9,500 the City
buildintts totaling 3 of the
is consistent with Subarea ative Declaration aSF on
°sect
use ° an e_ n --- 51 ew
U on a roval of a rove t o pr
Plan. An j ria a esi n
planner Wi y
one- r-- e= omm-�_ -r
Committee has
omm Review
�a,mittee° with the following
roject
the project
B. Desi n Revie pQrOva to
i—ecomm+en E' er has agreed
develop
conditions which the
p asking ratio ofrea ne should be
1. A manuf%:turing use
foi.t of gross building
500 square
provided. avers should be
brie p
a Pedestrian walkways such as
to connect the. parking wlks to interior
provided ublic ,
use and from P
proposed
Pedestrian walkways.
cover and 1.
including shrubs, ground
30 linear feet of should bQ
3. Landscaping* �usidesgof building
north uD °.
trovided to the east and
to the west side of building
prov
and public
should be screened from
(2) three (3)
!-he plaza areas
4. views tFeron Boulevard) with two
and shrubs.
feet of berming
screen wall should be
(8) foot high and shall be
An eight areas
provided to the storage to be consistent
5.
materials and color
appropriate
with proposed buildings- of solid view
6. storage area gates should metal, such as
obstruct'Ive material
be provided.
Materials and color samples should
7. part I and II of the Inwill
have
Study anY
-- -�—'�" Fias been fund that there result of th s
C. Enviro� ►menete1Asahssenvironmental impacts as
eEn comp asdverse
significant
project.
LI
(�y PLANNING COMMISSION STAMP 'REPORT
i�. September ail, 1986
DR 85-39 - Davie
Page 3
l
III. RECOMMENDATION: 'Staff recommends that the Planning; Commission issue a
Negaiive ec aration for Development Review 85 -39.
Ref ect u,1ly sub - ted,
Bra Buller
j =F City Planner
e
BB :CW:ko
H Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site plan
t; Exhibit "C" - Elevations
Exhibit "D" Grading Plan 1
Exhibit "E" - Illastrated Site Plan 1
or
f
k �
��.
. � »
� .d ■
subarea
fie+
mm pity
Center J
Ol
n4<
q p! /
CITY OF ITEM: vr— . 0 5-, \
RANCHO CUCA\ƒC.NGA TlfLE:-MO-N :
&y /! /C DIVISION2 LlrliT f e a» 2
\t
U
e
EJ
'na'rnno�raaaanaknr�
Ji!!Yd 1tl183SflQMt NVId 3t��
t: i ea�ataoea� a���e� S31AVQ a3�1tl13J
I//w/r/rtiLn_aeris/��r�rw/i/iw ■■ ",Si7s�/Tna: o
ii
AA
37F
# iii
� i_ j �!(
�t�
`
iilr ti i�¢
M 3
511
? q t
a'Ii I !jl
5�
4? �
I//w/r/rtiLn_aeris/��r�rw/i/iw ■■ ",Si7s�/Tna: o
ii
AA
A-71
'y�'y��O�y���OMTIIyY
NUVd Zalal$�lC�if
1;
t
Sain6a
0�laaisfll !f
mot'
Hwy
N
-f>k
'y�'y��O�y���OMTIIyY
NUVd Zalal$�lC�if
t
Sain6a
0�laaisfll !f
mot'
-f>k
VV-- - i 0iT -' C,
13
N
mot'
d
N
IGjiil;
���y
i IIF�
01
a
z�
y !jl s
.
lii f• -
t yyU
xy
j;u,.
ijI
o
�
8 �a�W�
13
tl�I
c�
_ _
a
1
1 Q'v �
W
11
yq �..
•ilk 1
Y�
y�j
� 1��
1M it �
'1
tS�
y
9��!
�
_
JI _
iieie
m
ikI
���
t
�3
tIj
1lfl�
I�hj'
i
�gw
Jw14
j1
!
VV-- - i 0iT -' C,
13
N
mot'
d
N
IGjiil;
���y
i IIF�
01
•1
z�
py�
j;u,.
S ,
x /!•
t}`�t''
I
tl�I
tS�
y
9��!
�
_
JI _
iieie
VV-- - i 0iT -' C,
13
mot'
d
N
Sg
01
•1
z�
py�
t
�1
S ,
x /!•
t}`�t''
I
VV-- - i 0iT -' C,
13
Ic
E
3 --1
asl
4T
j: 3ai
`.
q s
i.
� � � e Yi'f4HOfg110 OMA111y Na °Id
a >.�... t� 3.US
�aaa ml snaa�!
swauisyopc� aJ�.+eJ� _ 53IhA!(ig calvol5C17�! py
a
sA'
t
Z
A�q
m�+�
LW
i
ffatrfl■I�rt ff /Y�<t %�tiflf��rsrtf�fl tTylrfeyTt'ffflEldttt)fiGtff ■fl�yglflft rt��f'RRflfflf
i
k
a `
6'
F
--- ---- -- CITY OF RANCHO Ci3CAMQNGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 10, 1, 36 y9n
T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -22 - HIGHLAND
e proposed MasiF Plan or thE7
eve opment.o 'a 6,400 square foot church and two 2,25'
square foot .accessory multi= purpose buildings on 3.6 acres
aG land fn the Low Residential District, located at the
southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Garnelian Avenue -
APN 207 - 214 -08.
I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a one (1) year time
extension or Conditional Use . Permit 84 -22, as describ, -, above.
The project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on
October 24, 1984 and currently expires on October 24, 1986.
1I. ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit 8(-22, as approved with
con ad t ons, complies with all current Standards of the Development
Code. Sufficient funds for church construction should become
available upon sale of the adjoining Tract 12820.
III.' RECOMMENDATION: Staff recozwends that the Planning Commission
gran an ex ension for one (1) year until October 24, 1987.
ReSpefully submitted,
Rrad Buller
City Planner
8D:C41:ns
Attachrei,ts: Letter From Applicant Requesting Time Extension
Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Master Plan
Time Extension Resolution of Approval
ITEM C
i %land onimun ty- Covenant C 1
V�y [ �A �g ��]� fjii i ,, ' � r � t jl • w t NI s"i �F
ALL.iAM A. EM. \ ) ^ •.� } • + t } L hx ,� I y,1 �iR
' 6642Camelian
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 41701 August 15, 1986
987.5434 Office
x st
980-5940 Home t
Planning department
j -City of Rancho Cucamonga
s,.. -F. �.... iiox '847.
-
Rancho :ucamonpa; CA.
ALt.n. Mr. Seoti'•Murphy
L
Dear . Mr. i'Furphy i` r + � • + t ,,
The ., -•„ '.,� ,,^ �.- ,.:' ° +.' p�p i»}�. - -•.,
r present latter is to request an extension of our Conditional
Use Permit No. 04•-22 issued to the Highl and Community Covenant t :.
Church. The .subject property is located at4,he southwest corner „ 1 .•�M1j
o+ Highland and Darnelian in the City of R,�,ncttn Cucamonga
We are requesting the extension of this conditional use permit to
allow us to complete negotiations .with '-.a developer ;who is , +Fi M.�
purchasing our Tentative Tract Map Into. 1282¢. Upon the close
escrow on that property we expect to be able to began our
construction project.., L
Ems' Enclosed aff1f,;r•#
r, please Find a check in the amount of 62.0 6 to coven` �,tYL
k thr= -fee for the requested extension. IF you have any questionLi
A�?•• regarding this extension please call. me.
fir'. Sa n`cerel y.
i tt F 10, +a
William A. Enns,
Highlanr Comu,uitity Covenant Church '!
�',
M
W
®log ■ ■yA �� -■
�wfE;.at �iu y
I
son SEEM
- - r -r }w
�FF
o �
AL
M r --r
N URTH
CITY OI ITC,NI: COP 8 #- lZ
R.ANCI,O CL.GC IMOINGA TITLE: LvC471,0Ar MAP
PLANNING DIVISIGN L,�I f1131T- �r� u
R?4cr "In -Wry
1� L-j-
CITY or,
RANC,T-jo CUCAMOjNGA
PLANNINU 1),IVISIQN
NURTH
ITEM: CW 04.22
TITLE-: AON O�Pl' M,�AAM& idld
EXHIBIT- "Je'y
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION,
APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSIGH FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
84 -22
WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for -the
above- described project, pursuant to Section 17.02.100; and -
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the
above- described ConditionE1 Use Permit.
SECTION 1: The kancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following in—d ngs:
A. That prevai "ping economic conditions have caused a
distressed mat et climate for development of the project.
B. That current itr,iomic, marketing, and inventory conditions
make it unreasr)vabie to develop the project at this time.
C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval
regarding expirations would not be consistent with the
intent of the Development Code.
0. That the granting of said time extension will not be
detrimental to the pu`;1ic health, safety, or welfare, or
materially inju -ions to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Pl,neing Commission hereby grants a
time extens o`i n Tor:
Project .8ER11cant Expiration
CUP 84 -22 Highland Community Church October 24, 1987
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 107; SAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
ennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST: - fra3 Buller, Deputy secretary
i .
A
Resolution No.
CUP 84 -22 - Highland Community Church
Page Z
I, Brad. Buller; Deputy Secretary of the Planning CoWssion of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resol`uti.on was duly and
regularly introduced, passed,, and adopted by the Planning C61mission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a rehul.,ar meeting of the Planning Zomnission held
1 on the 10th day of September, 19861., by the fallowing vote -to -wit:
f AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
„I
-,
�axi-Z yr 11rilYt�AV �+Ut�EilY1VlVlxEi GUCAi�IQ
STAFF REPORT
tt
Q C
E
U �
DATE: September 10, 1986 1977
T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Chris Wesiman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: TIME WENSIO, FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12820 HIGHLAND
- A propose custom lot 555th vi s—''" on 'to
create ots on about 4.1 acres of land in the Low
Residential Development District (2 -4 du /ac), located at
the southwest corner of Jasper Street and Highland Avenue
- APN 201 - 214 -08.
I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a one (1) year time
ex ens on or Tentative Tract 12820, as described above. The
project was originally approved on November 14, 1984 by the
Planning Commission and currently expires on NovembeyJ4, 1986.
II. ANALYSIS: Tentative Tract 12820 is in conformance with the Basic
tan ar s for the Low Residential District as approved with
conditions.
III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
gran an extension or one (1) year until November 14, 1987.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Bu11er
City Planner
BB:CW:ns
Attachments: Letter From Applicant Requesting Extension
Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Subdivision Map
Time Extension Resolution of Approval
ITEM D
City of Rancho Cucamonga } "ri t Fc t r t^ rs z;
IW .; e
9320 Baseline, Suite IVI
Rancho CucamL,-4;a;, CA ` 91730
Attention: City Clerkls' Office
4 ± BE: TRACT NO. 12820 TWATM
Gentlemen:
The above mentioned Tentative fact No. 12820;,, ri.11 expire on 7i
November 14, 1986.
On behalf-£ Our client we are requesting a one (1) "year extension Y
Of time arr2 continuance of any, rPClassification, Variances and/or
other actions peltaining to the abbe mentioned Tentative Treat.
till ,
� � yams,
ANACAL ENGINEERING CONLp W d
by
f e1;e f
P CJQ.jh
cc: C.T.K., Inc., Owner M
P
.; .. C
C. J, "Our,1IRM. PREatot`taT ,
,
ANAcm, ENGINEERING Co. -
-
_. E
ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING ,
202
POST OFFICE SOX 3888& h ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92803 3860., 3
i..
(M) 774-4763
AAPst 20, 1986 ") 'ysr j;R i 4 P V ZVI
h. �Ii3 CUCA ri
Trf-cl -4kk 4X-2 Ala 1.131154-M) Tr,,cl A�.
Z cm - e. t- k-rvi
77-4d At im a
ll� P,-o
f
--------------
d Ab. 88
NORTH
CITY OF, ITEM: — -IT 1.282q__
RAIINCHO CUCt"'IOINGA TITLE- -!.ZcqrloivM
jilp
PLANNING J)j'l,'jSjk)s i".'VIII l-r. 'A"
-3
j..
'�• �; �• � .4'�' 1}MM'� WM1 wNSVY N• a1J 1+� y �' ��..IA
��. +t R1p � � SS1YN Y �. ..�. S'1►N .lam x .'V��enO♦ ✓. fIM � { ~y.Y�
�'. g111 Yf 1'w'' .• i
�'�. ,j }j,��j • Rsrd '4wlr aw.r �war.y � .....^^"' j � { I.
` .. ..- .... /rJ. i �• 4'�'�`` .kr.aY +rY - ✓.� � sis +yP1
7 w. et» E.`4i�la � ,.� r R'�•L,'.r t�'�^- �•�. -." ": t ""..".- ....-+^:.
{ 3r
FLA?.Q
111 N duw.M �N
I ORTH
E CITY Off,
-1 -10 C�.,r�,ANIOi�r�xt�s TITLC �vtxd #'vr'si� tYic�� �
.. .
� ' N,'4IN'G, DIVISION t:4II1131T
d
RESOLUTIO N
?. N U.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA14ONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12820
WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for.-'the
�.; above- described project pursuant to Section 17.02.100; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above
described Tentative Tract.
hL
SECT.LON 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following ndings;
A. The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial
+' compliance with the City's current General Plan, Specific
Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies; and,
B. The extension of the 'tentative Map will not cause `
significant inconsistencies with the current General tian,
Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies;
and,
C. The extension of the Tentative Map is, not likely to cause
public health and safety problems; and,
D. The extension is within the times limits prescribed by j
state law and local ordinance.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a
time extension or;
Tract Applicant Facj ration
12820 Highland Community Church November 14, 1987
i
APPROVED AUD ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986.
i
PLANNIW4^2 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCN.O CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bull er, eputy ecretary
D-
�, � ''`."T',
a7s aye'
M Z 4t {yam,
Resolution No.
TT12820 - Highland,Community Church
z
September 10, 1386 z
Page 2
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planri,ng Cpfnissi,bn of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do•hereby°oertffy that.the foregoing Resofuti`on wis duly. and
regularly intraduaed, passed, and adopted by the Pl °arming Commission of the,
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the''Planning Gotisson held i
on the 10th day of September, 1985; by the following vbte -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ,
NOES: C01MISSIONERSt I
ABSENT: COMMISSPONERS: $l
1
;:a
r
K7j-
EL—M,
�ll I VV nAINU11V UVUAMUNUA CA
STAFF REPORT
01
DATE: September 10, 1986 1977
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Bruce Cook, Associat2 Planner
SUBJECT: DESIGN REt�IEW FOR TRACT 13022 (WEST) - THE WILLIAM LYOR
-COMPART --Re—vie—w-07 _nev)!:751�' j��] : 3 : � I! or ; :�::,�!�; ��!��!)Uu Series for
Tr_a_c_Fn022, a recorded residential subdivision, including
275 single family lots on 44.1 net acres within the
Victoria Planned Community, located on the west side of
Milliken Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad
APN 202-211-13, 38, 41, 42; 202-221• 27.
I. ACTION REQUESTED: The William Lyon Company Is requesting design
review_a_p_p_ro_v—aF_for1 a new house plan for their 4600 Series homes
within their recorded Tract 13022 (West).
II. ANALYSIS:
A. Ceneral: Tentative Tract 13022 was approved by the Planning
Z—Omimission as a total development on November 13, 1985. yhe
181 lots to the east of the greenbelt are designed with a zero
lot line product, i.e., the 3000 Series-, and the 94 lots to the
west of the greenbelt are designed with a more traditional
center-plot product. i.e., 4500 Series.' This request is for
review of s new house plan for the 4500 Series homes west of
the Dasseo greenbelt.
At the time of the Tentative Tract approval, the Commission
approved three (3) house Plans within the 4500 Series, These
approved house plans included two one-story units (Plans I and
2), and one two-story unit (Plan 3). The original approved
House Plans 2 and 3 have now been designated as House Plans 1
and 2, respectively. The Lyon Company is now requesting to
eliminate the single-story house plan (Original House plan 1),
and replace this with a new two-story house plan (New House
Plan 3). The architecture of the new house plan is consistent
and compatible with that of the approved units. A revised plot
plan showing the Plotting of the new house plan has been
provided by the Lyon Company. The building footprint of this
new house plan does allow for its placement in conformance with
all setback requirements. Back yards are sufficient in size
such that there is significant building separation between
ITEM E
PLANNING COMMISSION S.TA�FF REPORT f
Tract 13022 .- Wi 14 -i,aft
Lyon Comgany
September 10, 1986
f° Page 2 ro
adjoining ,.rear yards. These large rear yard setbacks would
sufficieu'..-jr mitigate second story views into neighboring lots
such tha',.�-the placement of an additional two -story ; house plan
within the tract should not result in the loss of Tprivacy for
any adjacent lots.
B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee review4'q
th7s request at t eir meeting of August 21, 1586 and has
recommended Sts approval.
III, FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Manning Commission to
consider approua , t e following findings must be made:
1. That this project is consistent with the Development
Code, t ;te Victoria Community Plan and the General Plan;
a
2. That this project will not be detrimen,,jl to adjacent
properties, or cause significant environiaental impacts;
and
3. That the F,sposed use is in compliance with the
applicable provisions of the Development Code, the
Victoria Community Plan, and City Standards.
'i
IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
this reques .— If the Planning Commission concurs with the Facts for
Findings, adoption of the attached Resolution would be in
order.
Respectfully s' ted,
,a
q
Brad Bull r
I
City Planner
BB :BC;ns
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract 13022
Exhibit "C" - Approved. Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Proposed Revised Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Approved House Plan
Exhibit "F" - Proposed House Plan
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
r C
SMObGJI� .t �. �5331�tlT 3H1 ,
3 ti H • ('
J
�� ✓�; •. „ .. � �.z a L�i. --==.� g,i}
U s�
a. 0x�
w w [ll
Uj
j
'J 3 z z. Z
CC
ol
S 3
h Tn N N
Q I
Of
�-
w �u z z z a
9
I 0
9 0 0 J
$ _<m0,0w o =�
Q- `m_mmmm
w m 2 S x x v X
CITY OF ITE,I i =,
RANCHO CUCA INIojXGA TITLE=
PLANNING DIVISIC),N EKHIIIIT= " t .
i
� yE s e• �s r d
a� :aaa
e "a
fill
iPi
s;! Ila E
a
CITY QF
RANCHO CUCAI�/I01'GA
PLANNI'N'G DIVISION
—q
S-
RIM
v
7`y
¢NO-
fill
� -$o
i
:1 , v
1p ®L
TITLE-
EYIiI[31T. — SCALE =_
i
c
LOT 2E1 ]_ ..i
_ 6r 6 , �. •t.f.^ n.J .l
LOT 278
SG'om 6 PAW SITF
LEE SLEET WO. I
1 sfr� ,r wry so
j'h Y
/ � :I @ 'r:• ele �'p.4 ep'a ri n•v. .n.� \� a r °." w `
—e ' +:
.._I `i: • F •r0 � s. aj ®r aw -k. 6' y. � \ ®r ! t ®.. ®� c
• ` `.I � .• s o m t L w . � \ _ yrk:,••x 1 ( � Pin\ 4 � ng � 6.t, _nor . • �...
.[07'277 \ P r ! w � / ` ' � •,V r a -• .a � � _'- IS
LOT 2TC
274D - - sn...aw SEE SHEET Nm T,` —�
SHEET Y OF 3
TFNTATIVE TRACT NO 13022 •.�
�yn� ,�pypty
��dFdt.�.7DAS14s.' eR7I.LtA�M LYON �isnas 7ilOR1ECON9VLTlfe�CG;ROVP-
rb r . -.• �ur.c.erCONe X71W GROUP
I
NORTH
CITY or,
ITFrm= t f '1-60
RANCHO CUCA�VIOJJ�GA TITLE:
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT :"S d42cCALE;
E -5-
AM
�-
N maw owt�;4WPlfOdD 1
SCHOOL $ PARK SITE
• POTEMUL RV. PARKM
NTPLM
Y Win. a
1, y t
rw,acaar
°
LA
.a , \
jp
N 'f
f
3
1
DETAILED 3ITl= PLAN 1 -'
CITE' OF
RA\'CHO CUCAVIONGA TITLEt
PLANNING DIVISION E`LHIBIT: 1! SCALE-
7 �
�r► law ..;!� 6
e t PLAN
iota so �
tl
r
CITY OF ITEM I.
RANCHO C�rC., ATWONGA TITLEt G
PLANNING DIVISION EX"IBIT- 1 1 1 SCAT -R.
E
a SSAOHD
c-lTY Or ITEM -. V I
]tAINCHO CUCAiNIONLGA TITLE-
IT. sc I
PLANNING DIVISION F..
RLEVATIONS
PLAN 2
WW Nntt�•
0
� SIA ;x4tss ?6&-4
CITY 011,
RAINCHO CUCATMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
GALE.
PLAN -2
IISS 30 FY
n
-8 S3AOHD _
N
Z
O
h
a
1I
a
x�
NW
.QI O
At v
CITY Or ITEM:
RAINC O CUC.n11 ONGA TITLE:
PLANNING DIVISION gVilBI T� = G
mu
OR
PLAN Ali
CITY Or,
ITEM-
RAINCHO CUCAjvjoN A
.G TrME:
PLANNING D1\qS10A EX AB
�-Sc,��LL
I E
Ell.
IE
SSAOUD
x
a.
.a
Lu
w`
I-
a
a\
W
Z z .
J 0
avw
CITY Car ITr:.►: r--R �
RANCHO CUC-- AlfiJ,°GA TITLE: ��.+d04
PLANNING DIVISION GYf�II3IT- " 'L SCAT E: 1
Z'-13
Q
�
<
9 SSROFiJ
w
v
S
W
<
a
Y
( W y
Y
E3
W
<
0
Y
c
w:>
r,
4 'Mv id
? Nvld
�'
Y
ID
W
W.
iY
W
W
w
-�
W
A
W
W
Y.
1 1~L
�y
LL
�1
�
LL
L!
I
.W.1
Yj
LL
�
(
w
rd
Q
�
<
N
w
v
S
W
<
a
Y
( W y
Y
E3
W
<
0
Y
c
R p "�
,( Ll q
.LLi .i,l W
m lJ I i �. _ W.
W w W
G ^" W
N N N I N N I p
u z _ s �
\ ¢ s a �--•
CITY OF
ITEM: �(�.�� � 122, r �a _;
RAI CHO CUCAi1/IONGf TITr_E:
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT "
,``�
13 s -LOWD
i -
E NVId
.WI .Wi W
7t1 W' r
W W W
1 o
u LU
W W W
J J j
n w w
w
W » �
ER 6 Y
� Y
• C ■
Y C
r
e
� � n
ZL
W W W
W W c
N
t
CITN' or,
ITEM:
A1 -s HC? CLCAiN,IC�. GA TITLE ACO' -'— ►i �
PLANNING DIVISION E.X41BIT ` "-� SCALE=
1; 1
PLAm 3
MlFftl
CITY OF
ITEM:
RANCHO CLTCANIJONGA
TITLE:
PLANNING Di'll LIC)�q F—XHIBIT- q its SCALE-
�.x
ELEVATIONS
PLAN
A
CITY OF r
RANTCHO CUCkNIO \GA TITLE.�"'ur%ia�a� �t�t. , NA
PLn \N�tING DI'4 I510:V MUBIT3 "" SCALE:
E -•17
1
ELEVATIONS
PLAN
A
CITY OF r
RANTCHO CUCkNIO \GA TITLE.�"'ur%ia�a� �t�t. , NA
PLn \N�tING DI'4 I510:V MUBIT3 "" SCALE:
E -•17
0
n
' CITE' ar, ITEM =�.
RA CHO CUCANIOI GA TITLE
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: �'" 5CAI rl
a
ee D }
i
O �
0
s
I FF�
I 6
'a \ =a
,rW!
CITY ar, ITE \I:r
R INCH) CUCATIVI'INGA TITLE:
PLANNING DIVISION E1Hfi3t�['' -� SCAi'E 1
x
F ^
�RM
8:
I FF�
I 6
'a \ =a
,rW!
CITY ar, ITE \I:r
R INCH) CUCATIVI'INGA TITLE:
PLANNING DIVISION E1Hfi3t�['' -� SCAi'E 1
El
Ll
n
a
N
ti
r
0
0
0
a
4
11
S�v II J U
r
CITY Off' ITI; \I :��
RANCHO CUCATMONGA TITLE: e
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT. Its SCALE-
RESOLUTION NO.. 1
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAICHGA PANNING COMMISSION'
APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR A- iEW FLU61 PLAN FOR TRACT
13022 (WEST) LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF "KILLIKFN' AVENUE,
NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, WITHIN THE
VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY.
WHEREAS, or'i the 10th day of September, 1986, th6, Rancho Cucamonga
PI -,inning Commission held a meeting to consider the above -ides %gibed project.
follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved a!;
SECTION 1; That the following can he met:
1. That the proposed project is consistent with the
objectives of the General Flan; and
2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of
the Development Code and the Victoria Community Plan and
the purposes of the district in which the site is located;
and
3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the
ap ":able provisions of the Development Code and the
Victoria Community Plan;, and
4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions of
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements ill the vicinity.
SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tract 13022 (West) is approved V
subject to 7i47Md owing conditions: 4
1. This approval is only far the addition of one new house J
plan to the existing house plans approved for the 4500
Series adopted with the approval of Tentative Tract 13022
by the Planning Commission :per Resolution No. 85-169.
2. All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract 10322 per
Resolution 85 -169 shall remain applicable with this
approval for Design Peview.
3. All new house plans shall be plotted in such a runner as
t be in conformance with all conditions of the approves
tentative tract, and shall meet all miniqum setback
requirements.
4F
,*.
Resolution No.
TR 15022 - William Lyon Company
Septemb6i+ 10, 1986 <4
;, Page 2 .,
4i 4, Detailed site 6-- velopment plans including but not limited
to, plot plans and architectural plans shill be submitted
• .A' for the review and appraval of the City Planner prior to
issuance of any building permits.
x
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS IOTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986.
t� PLANNING COMMISSMU OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
r Dennis .
tout, airman_ -__;
ATTEST: r
Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary ,,,�
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the- Planh-;dg Commission of the 'City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the f`regoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular m�--tiag Af the Planning Commission held
on the 10th day of Septcaier, 1986, by the'fo1j6W'ing vote -to -wit,
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COWISSIUNERS; �1
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: - a
U,
Ll
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
By'
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
w
Q' 4
September 10,1986 U
i977
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer
Barbara {frall, Assistant Civil Engineer
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 905 - Hardcastle
- A subdivision of 15.0 acres of land into I parcel and a remainder
parcel in the very low (1 -2 du /ac) and estate residential (0 -1
du /ac) Development Districts located on the north8'ide of 23rd
Street, east of Etiwanda Avenue (APM 225, - 122 -11)
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:'
A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as
shown on Exhibit "B"
B. Parcel Size:
Parcel 1 - 1.0 acres
Remainder parcel - 14.0 acres
C. Existing Zoning:
Very Low - 1 - 2 du /ac
and Estate Residential 0 -- 1 du /ac Development District
D. Surrounding Land Use:
North - vacant —
South - existing singlO family residence
East - citrus grove
West - ;ucamonga County Water District reservoir site and single
family residences
E. Surrounding General Plan and Develo ment Code Designations:
North - Count y o� San Berraraino
South - Estate Residential (0 - 1 du /ac)
East - Estate Residential 0 - 7 du/ac)
West - Estate Reside €,tial (0 1 du /ac)
ITEM F
Tr "o,
�-r
TO: Chairman and Membr^ of the Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Epvironmerta:l Assessment end 'CPn 3tive Parcel Map 99!
DATE, September lD, 1986
PAGE Z
F. Site Characteristics:
Parcel 1 contains a sirgle family residence and s partial]
planted as a lemon grove. The remainder parcel contains a lemon
grove. The site slopes is a southerly direction.
II. ANALYSIS:
ne pur5ose of this TentativzV Parcel Map is to separate the property
containing the exi -sting single family residency, from the remainder
portion 1r order to—ell th_ single fnmily residence.
This subdivision does not technically conform to the Jhasic Planning
Commission Access policy (refer, to Exhibit "C ") in that,it does not have
dedicated or paved access tj a m intained city street. r,bwever, it could .
be approved under the allowable variation section..
Aitheugh staff strongly supports the basic .:cuss policy, it appears that
a variation Is warr3;zted in this case for tre following reasons:
1. The property as ;�t exists does not conform to the pnlicy, therefore
the subdi±rision gill net create the nonconformity.
2. The subdivision itself will •,not agc.,svate an existing problem.
Additional homes cannot b constructed or the remainder parcel
until it con,'Gmrtr to the` access policy (required by Sp_c:al
Coadition No. 1).
3. A similar approval was granted ;;' the Planning Commission on
October 24, 1979 for the property directly to the south of 23rd
Street (Parcei Map 4773).
The Plarning Commission appears to have the folloWitg options:
1. Approval of the project as proposed,
2. Continue the parcel map, with the consent of the applicant, until
dedicated access is obtained to the site, or
3. Denial of the Tentative Parcel Map.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial
to y. tafi conducted a field investigation and completed Part II of
the Initial Study. No auverse impacts upon the environment are
anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative
Declaration is appropriate.
0
7
TO., Chairman and Members of the Planning C1.1arossion
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Tentative Parcel Map. 9995
DATE: Sep*-ember 10, 1980
PAGE 3
it. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing hav-. benr, sent to surrOunding
property;5wners and placed %'!the, Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the
site �as, also been completed.
V. RECOMMENDATfOtl: It. is recommended that th,�--Planning Commission consid2r
all inpult_57U elements of the Tentative hrcel Map.' if after such
consi�Leration, the �rtoainission cexi recommend approval, then the- adoption
of the ki�tached Reso'luvinn and issuance of a Negative Declaration would
be ,ppropr� 'late,.
Respectfully submitted,
��A"t
ryel liani
- on
Se�-4,or Civil Engineer
SRH:BK:diw
Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "An)
Tpntative Mc.v (Exhibit "Big)
Exhibit "C"
Resolution and
Recommended Conditions of Approval
0
�-q
4 It
Site
170140, jW/L
43740
SL36 AV
I
Ir
1461 AC, M/L
. ............
Ic
424 AC
7.24AM
1-9
Par.?
asIs
Im
4.Z41C
— — — — — — —
ST
-'941
L64
ti
S4W
@
,
1.3AC
tbl
Par.
2
J 60
f
AC cao
loti Ac.
5.02 ac
2
IF-7
V
cm
rO
71
"AC
fart
3.044CAOIL
ar.4
(7:8)
(�
s
��'�`
W?AC
-
t�3 0 4
P..
Y
Tjj= T) F� p
CITY ul,
RANCTI-10
11
W
ENGMEBRING DWE-TON
EXMIT.-
�-q
Lu
0
;..a .............
!Vv 3.
N
Qw
O'D
w Zt.
W.
xx ¢ a L 7
it
9
iE ca
cv
C.,
L,
pul
IN ri
M -,, � &-- 64
zw w ;ii Ili 3.
fl,
w
1
0 j"
v
44
43 zo V) t
Ig M, 1 i>
gui
Ca
EXHIBIT "B"
7�F
�
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -07 I
A RESOLUTION OF ;THE PLANNING C0141ISSION OF THY
CITY
`
OF RANCHO C(CAMONGA ESTABLISHING SUBDIVISION
ACCESS WROVDIENT POLICY;
l
}
s
WHEREAS, the Planning C,ommisaion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
wishes to discourage the
proliferation of private unimprov1 � streets; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish firm Policy guideline to
inlorm property owners
of the City goals.
NOW, THEP.EEORE, HR IS RESOLVED AND ESTABLISHED, that as a condition
of approval of any Parcel Map, Parcel
clap Waiver, Tract Map or Lot Line
Adjustment an A,plicant shall hare access to a. fully dedicated
i'
and maintained.
City street. Where dedications and improvements do not exist, the applicant
Shall obtain a minimum
of:forty (40) feet o£ dedication',ird il:prove wjEn
(2ti) feet of
.pavEment needed et frontage to reach the !acesr,
iaintained City streei.
�
a
Variations from this policy will require approval of the City 1,ngineer
of the City of Rancho 4ucamonga subjec,Y to appeals to the Planning Commission.
'i
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 1979.
`
PLANNING C0124ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI•I ONGA
J
By:,
erm empel, Chairman
ATTES
Secreta-j of the Planning Commission
I, Jack Lam, iacretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamauga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopr -d by the Planning Commission
of the Cit}*'ef Rancho Cucamonga at
a regular lowin meeting of the P ?;inning C'�-mnission held on the 24th
by the followinL vote to -wit: day of January, 1979,
AYES: CM- IISSIONERS: GARCIA, TOLSTOY, JONES, RDTPEL
DOES: COMISSIONERS. NONE
ABSENT: CO12IISSIONERS: DAHL
t' "Crt
EXHIBIT
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP XVMBFR 9995
7
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map N tuber 9995, submitted by Mr.
,o- Hardcastle, applicant, for the purpose of subs; viding into 1 parcels, the real
property situated in the City of Rancho Cucatonga, County of San Bernardino,
State of California, identified as APN(s) 225- 122 -11, located on the on the
northsde of 23rd Street, East of Etiwanda Avllnue; and
WHEREAS, on September 10, 1986, the 'Planning Commission held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above- desc;,Doed map._
FOLLOZ: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS
SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan.
Aft 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is
OF consistent with the General Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed development.
4. That the proposed ° subdivision ane improvements will
not cause substantial environmen : °al damage., public
health problems or have adverse affects on abutting
property.
SECTION 2: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 9995 is hereby approved
subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special"
Conditions:
Special Conditions
1. Upon further development or subdivision of the remainder parcel, a 26 foo�
wide pavement within a 40 foot wide dedication shall be provided from the
property (including Parcel 1) to a maintained City street.
2. Upon development of the remainder parcel, the street improvements and
utility undergrounding for 23rd Street fronting parcel 1 shall be
completed. A lien agreement against Parcel 1 shall be recorded with the
final Map to guarantee these street improvements and the undergrounding of
existing overhead utilities from the first pole east of the site to first
pole west of the site.
F -�
yA TIT
P
M
RESOL'UI _ON NO.
PM9995 - Hardcastle
September 10, 1986
Page 2
3. A 10 foot wide equ ;,strian easement for local trails shall be } ^ovided
along the northerly, and easterly property lines of- Parcel 1. A corner
cutoff shall be provided at the northeast corner of the property to ensure .
an adequate turning dimension for vehicles. The trails shall be installed
at the time `of development of the remainder parcel. A lien acreement
against Parcel 1 shall be recorded with the final map to guarantee the
installation of the equestrian trails,
4. Private drainags easements for Parcel l as approved by the building
official :shall be noticed or delinated on the final map.
5. Drainage facilities for the protection of Parcel i shall ue constructed to
the satisfaction of the building official prior to .recordation of the
final map. Drainage improvement plans as required by the Building Of ;ical
shali be submitted prior to recordation of the final map.
5. Urainage fra,s for Parcel l in the amornt of $7,500 per net acre shall be
paid prior to recordation of the final map.
6. An offer of dedication of the south ten (10) feet cf Parcel 1 and of the
remainder parcel shall be delineated on the final map.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chair:ia-a
ATTEST:
Bra�Ic Buller, Deputy Secretary
I, Brad Biller, Deputy Secretary of the P' „fining Commission of the city of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was do-ty and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at.a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on 'ne 10th day of September, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMIS`,iIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIMRS:
w
a
6
'a
4
C
.o
c
i
�p
P
C
O
t
Mr
em
s&
4
�S
Tub
�
7q�♦
`r
.G�
w
Ny .GC✓
G w4
40.
y
�
;.
KU
NZ,
v4
�
45.E
P
Nq 'PaZ
pV
S
rw
1
J ate.
��YT
D
CV
a•`
4
`b dh.N
^9
v
NON
r
V
4
�£
A
w
Ty
P,
n
v
�w6i
sC
4.
:n •O'.
d
31
A•
y.�
O
_
-�or�
4e
y
�j•N 63 i�
M
�
G I
4w7
•yGr �1r
.OQ
L
N
u i q
YF4•$
L
Y y
ry
4 o
�G ^b.
4
Z�ii
4 C
V O
O W
�CC
g:FL
v
r 2
V
y^
w ^�
P4.
CwC
A
4
dwV
yc.y0
4�•T..
�N
Y t
W q
yC y uG
H
an
V S
=21,z
Qf�
>
!O•
Y
G F
y 4
�'4 i.
O
N N 6
i �
4 U
-.1
O q
M o C
& L O.i
G '
y �
b�.•i
'O�
.oL I.
e F 0
C GR O
L G
n
R O R �1V •
+A y
4 f^
L
Q
c u c
_
e C G O• i..
44
9
r
Yi•
O
C
u
d
q
O w P
b y
r• NU aNM
4•A4
pp& y
O^
K4
B4
ay
O
N d Y
A
a
.ffj»^V
N Y K_4
CO
^fid
l
I
U
I
j
j1
w w
�£
A
n
v
�w6i
sC
4.
:n •O'.
d
31
A•
y.�
O
A
V
K r
3w
L
Y
tnu
L
N
u i q
YF4•$
L
Y y
ry
4 o
�G ^b.
4
Z�ii
4 C
V O
O W
d
C r
1
O?
4
y^
•
e F 0
�_
y
G Y'
Q
c u c
_
y
Vl
Yi•
O
y
Y
NCy.y
q
O w P
b y
w
O Z
y
L
O Y
a y
B4
ay
O
N d Y
A
a
.ffj»^V
N Y K_4
CO
^fid
F�
6,
U �
,�
w w
NN
Lyy
„aV.
N A L
�'
Y ►CM
N O
L�
Nr
"'a4
N•i
1�
N
Y
U ^
,�S
d
c�
r
x
`
V
y
y
1Y. >
4
bO
Y,f
ao
y0
Fw4 q
NN
g
d V
SC N
V.R
i4 M
b.
4R
4w
(
C4
GM
O
r y
G
t
C•
y1t
K'
�
�
i
Y
+
1
tlr
q.J 024 V NY Y
E F ZNa T.w
4 2'�
O v Y + U o
Z � w
OIO 4wV rC
u o_c
{H E p
v
`IS
,
9r YNL O�E� « LL.
2 d q« V L M C= 0
Mw 1�.` ^N. V•
Y
— c.[ ouw
.+nuoi Ra
e as e n
�1
I
I v
Hq �+
vv
Y1r qy
00 CG
wr �
v a.
O V 6
cy E.� Na
� Cc
a+ e a
49 Y Y
N N Y
e
OI 9 V mg
u0 V aY ^r
4 v p y 0
w 6 4 6 0 H,H
0
u
«aY °m
o ^-
^ N
6
d J �
i=
y � w
ua
� +w
°q
L = S
Ell
' Yy�
—wa$
M
zi
=a
w
vd
.a
w
4
u
ro
Qi
e
N
N=
Y
YppZ
Au
�°
^rte
a
no
rY
ow
�
ry
vy
o
"
goo
wA
w
OL
� M
Os
5t
+ v
n =
as
W�
O L
{Oj Q1
Y
'r C
9 V
w N
a
y y c
O
♦ C
C
O
,0
«aY °m
o ^-
^ N
6
d J �
i=
y � w
ua
� +w
°q
L = S
Ell
' Yy�
—wa$
M
zi
=a
„o
vd
w
.:
a
u
N
e
N=
ov
�°
^rte
ac
no
0
wn
N
Ue
.Y. D•
9
OL
O
Os
5t
+ v
W�
I
h
0 V
KI
.a
.4
M.'
M
f
i
nTmCr nrt s A �.enTtr� nTTrti i w ir.lt Tev
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
STAFF REPORT
A.
Action Requested: Approval
of the proposed
Tentative Parcel Map as
a � r
O d
Parcel Size:
Parcel 1 - 5.0 acres
U 7
BATE:
September 10, 1986
1977
TO:
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:
Rarrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer
1.5 acres
BY:
Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer
TOTAL 14.36
SUBJECT:
ENVIRONMFNTAL ASSESSMENT" AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
-Fielopment,
9955 - B. C. E.
Incorporate - A subdivision of
acres of land
Industrial Park (subarea 7)
ir,4o 7 parce'� in the Industrial Park District Y
subarea No. 7.,
D.
located between Arran Highway and Civic Center Drive and betweeii
Red Oak Street and White Oak Avenue (APN 208- 351 -42
thru 45)
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A.
Action Requested: Approval
of the proposed
Tentative Parcel Map as
shown on Exhibit "B"
B.
Parcel Size:
Parcel 1 - 5.0 acres
Parcel 5 -
1.68 acres
Parcel 2 - 1.25 acres
P4 rel 6 -
1.5 acres
Parcel 3 - 1.25 acres
Parcel 7 -
1.5 acres
Parcel 4 - 2.18 acres
TOTAL 14.36
acres
C.
Existing Zoning:
Industrial Park (subarea 7)
+
D.
Surrounding Land Use:
fforth •• Vacant
South - Vacant and existing
industrial
East - Yarant
;'est - Existing Industrial
Park
E. Surrounding Generai Plan and Deveicpme cn
nt Code Gesiations:
North - Indu,tria ar su area
South - .Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (subarea 9)
East Industrial Park (subarea 7)
West - Industrial Park (subarea 7)
ITEM 6
;* TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Tentative Parcel Map 9955
DATE: Septemier 10, 1986
PAGE 2 -
F. Site Characteristics:
There are no existing structures wit ;,in the site. There is some
vegetation including 5 trees which will require a tree removal
p,Mmit upon development of the parcels.
II. ANALYSIS:
The purpose of the Parcel Map is to create 7 separate parcels for lot
' sales to be developed by separate users.
The public streets adjacent to the site are improved with the exception
of sidewalks, street lights, drive approaches and landscaping which are
required upon development on a parcel by parcel basis.
Two issues associated with the Parcel Map are:
I. Fee for Undergrounding Utilities, and
2. Driveway locations
1. Fee tar Under�unding Utilities - Special condition No. 2 requires
that fees be Palk' as contributions to the future undergrounding of
the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) awl
locatea on the south side of Arrow Route which is consistent with
current Planning Commission Policy.. The developer has stated that
he is in disagreement with this requirement.
2. Shared Access Locations - The developer iias requested approval of
several specific driveway locations with the tentative Parcel
Map. Staff is reluctant to grant appraral of the driveways with
out the benefit of a Master Plan or specific development plans.
Special Conditions No. 1 requires that shared driveways be provided
on the common property line between adjacent parcels and postpones
the approval of additional or deletion of certain shared driveways
until specific development plans are approved for the parcels.
Shared driveways provide all parcels with two separate access
locations while minimizing the totul number of access points. This
in turn reduces possible access Offilicts with future development
of the surrounding vacant property.
The developer has expressed disagreement with this requirement.
111. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial
Study. Staf conducted a field investigation and completed Part Ii of d
the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are
anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative
Declaration is appropriate.
f
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Envi.ronm%kal Assessment and Tentative Parcel Map 9955
DATE: September 10, 1986
PAGE 3
IV.. CORRESPONDENCE: No. es of Pub] t Hearing have been sent to surrounding
property owners anc((pirr_c,( in the Da�!ly Report Newspaper: Posting at the
site has also been _coWlizied.
V. RECOMMENDATIGN: It is recomnanded that the ?Tanning Commission consider
all input and elements of -the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such
consideration, the Commiss -ion can recommend approval, then the adoption
of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would
be appro?riate.
,i
Respectfully submitted,
Barry Hanson
Senior Civil Engineer
BRIi:BK :dlw
Attachments: Vicinity Rao (,xhihit "All)
Tentative Map (Exhibit "B "i
Resolution and
Recommended Conditions of Approval
�1-
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMOI`T,,'x'A
E IGWWJNG )IV3bbYON
IfiEM: � A
T.IIu
G -
s
. . .. ........ .... . ...
'4T
"'J
z PEI
21
r"
�//z
W, S,
V p
L�Rji'
PC4
3al
RESOLI.+, jON NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 01 TtE Cl of OF
RA "XHO CICAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9955
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number_ 9955, submitted by B. C. E.
Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 7 parcels, the
real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,_, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 208 - 551 -42 thru 45,
located between Red Oak Street and White Oak and between Civic Center Drive
and Arrow Highway; and
WHEREAS, on September, 1986, the Planning C.mnission held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above - described map:
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COM4MISSION RESOLVED AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the following findings Have been made:
1. That the map is consistent with the General Flan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the General Plan.
3. That the site is Physically suitable for the
proposed development.
4. That the proposed subdr 'lion and improv<anents will
not cause substantial t%) +vironmental damage, public
health problems cr have adverse affects on abutting
i property.
SECTION ?- That Tentative Parcel Map No. 9955 is hereby approved
subject 5 tT e attached Standard Conditions and the follorwiny Special
Conditions:
Special Conditions
1. A reciprocal access easement (35' wide by 75' in depth measured from the
pu;, "c st.•eet curb face) centered on the common prope ^ty line between all
paa.•,,ls for use by the two adjacent parcels shall be - ecorded by Fe -crate
inst.-ument prior to recordation of t.:e Final Map. T�e one exz:;ption to
the above being that the easement for Parcels 2 a-id 3 shmli he centered
on the existing driveway located on the opposite (south) side of Arrow
Highway (approximatel- 18' to the east of the comet n parcel line). No
other access locatio,.s are approved by this Parcel Map. Other access
locations and the removal of the required reciprocal access locations may
be granted by the City upon development of the individual parcels.
G -tP
1 � � � ° �
I
i
RESOLUTION NO.
Pty 9555 SX.E. Development
September 1'r, 1986
Page 2
An i= -lieu fee as cdniribution to the futj a undergrounding of the
existing overhead utilltie -s (teleoamManicativh and electrical) on the
opposite side of Arrow Highway shall be paid to the City prior to the
issuance of building permits -3n a parcel by parcel basis for Parcel's I-
4. The total fee shall be one -half the adopted unit amount times the
length from the center of Red Oak Street to the Center of White Oak
Avenue (1197.5 feet).
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS IOTH DAY DP SEPTEMBER] 1986.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Bu 1 1 er, Deputy Secretary
1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly &nd
regularly introduced, passed, and adopter: b;Y the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular= -;nee ineg of the Planning Commission held
on the 10th day of September, 1986 by the' +ollowing vote -to- wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
L�M
L
d'
C'
y�
E
w
6
Y Y
+i
acv
�J s
E
N Y M
L�
4 �
Lys
is
> O LO
u
n �
C=
n �
v q^
H�
� q �
� Y C
�-v
.p
N 9 i I
=�q
L
U ti
_�•�
y
tlL
aF
n
r A
A a=
Y
LL
E w
tE
A
2 tl
d
,_ci
A.a
d
n.i
y
$
y
d
pppppp��
_ �•
ti
OdY.q
wy
V A
c
C
,
c o
y
p p
22
'`
l
a. �^
�
u 0 � M
C
7 4
..• ^
�
�
C O•
e
Y u
6
Nqq.
tt
E
qwL CO,
b� n
C = i+
p Ls
'^
NW
am
CC
r
r
4.
i
y a- O
W
L
Y
E- s
�
rn
= E Y.
6w L 4.
CdyQ
_
MO y9L
OJ >
...
l •
b�.E
a
O
t0•
np
yaq
vM
4.L
Qw�
6�wOF,.
n U
�y
t.
LpV
a4r
L
F
NU
=N�
GL� U
NNY�
J4�
�o
U�
ao
�V
oov. iii
L
U ti
_�•�
y
tlL
aF
y0.
LL
E w
tE
A
2 tl
d
,_ci
A.a
d
n.i
y
$
y
L
�.w
46
K
•
�
E- s
�
rn
E
2
G
OY
yaq
Cr
4.L
Qw�
C
L
'Or
v
L'
•u
v G
U
L Ly
w
�
M
d �
� M
a
y S
w
aq
...
a^
O�
...
C L -O
y
�
G N
Ya
Y
•L•
O'
= 2 S
L n
MYF
p
�y4
O
N
LpiN r<1Y
r1
Y
ri.
rl
3
�a
��ta
JPa
.J
M y�
aY
G
M
1
a
.. *c
So'E
^cam Nei
�+♦
F4 F V
YI
� �
.Y
�
w
a
�a
Q
q ♦ M
40 10
♦�+�
°Li
wpeu4
=U
is
wn
r
Lu
EM
6E
RV
y�tC
C.4
4
I
yE
L.Vi ✓
O_ NO
GSy
0���
4}
i.�Y
...SST
°L'°
C
6Y
C° 4 Y
6ti1�.
p6gg
V
O
n'rL
�°
U�
Oad+C
�i
s
♦EO O
Ado
n R�
... r°�y
� LmR
6
nP
C7C4
N ri
N
33fC?11 ..
N
iR
N
NI
G-7
ri.
rl
D
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
I. ABSTRACT: The applicant; is requesting approval of the revised site
p an an elevation as Br- dified by the adder{ truck loading dock
facility.
II. BACKGROL1): On June 25r 1986, the Planning Commission at its
regu ar meeting, conditionally approved the 35 acre Master Flan and
Phase I development as shown in Exhibi,; t°A ", The approved site
plan and eleiations for Phase I inclueesd roll -up service doors.
The �o',_;tions of approval required that the service roll -up doors
be moved closer towards the middle of the building for the east
elevation of building within Parcel 8 a,td the north elevation for
building, within Parcel 7. The applicant warns to provide tenants
with the option of having a loading dock if a tenant requires such
dock -high services. According to the applicant, tenants have not
been secured at the present time; however, the availability of Such
Option would be a marketing tool. The applicant -intends to proceed
with the construction of the pro ,4act as originally approved.
Should a prospective tenant require dock -high services, then
building permit plan &-ck would be necessary to modify the _.
project.
III. ANALYSIS:
A. Pro osed M1,difications: The proposed changes �J Parcel 8 show
two oading o`cks are added to the middle of thm building (east
elevation) as shown in Exhibit "C ". Eight foot :,,igh Walls are
provided on both sides to screen the loading doct, ¢ari li ty as
rewired by City code. To accommodate the length of a
ca:,'liner trailer truck and its arning radius, the entire row
of parking spaces along the east property boundary is
eliminated. Since the use is unkn?wn vie can only spOculate on
the required parking. However, the required parking will vary
ITEM H
7
DATE:
September ;0, 1986
t
TO:
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:
Brad Buller, City Planner
BY:
Nancy Fong, Associate planner
SUBJECT:
OCYEWPMENT REVIEW 86 -09 MOVIFICATION BIXBY
reque; to a
-
The
an aptiana true oa :ng ac ac7
each auild,ng within Phase I development, located
ity
on
for
the
port, side of 5th Street between Milliken Avenue,
Pittsburgh.Street - APN 229 - 261 -58, 59.
and
I. ABSTRACT: The applicant; is requesting approval of the revised site
p an an elevation as Br- dified by the adder{ truck loading dock
facility.
II. BACKGROL1): On June 25r 1986, the Planning Commission at its
regu ar meeting, conditionally approved the 35 acre Master Flan and
Phase I development as shown in Exhibi,; t°A ", The approved site
plan and eleiations for Phase I inclueesd roll -up service doors.
The �o',_;tions of approval required that the service roll -up doors
be moved closer towards the middle of the building for the east
elevation of building within Parcel 8 a,td the north elevation for
building, within Parcel 7. The applicant warns to provide tenants
with the option of having a loading dock if a tenant requires such
dock -high services. According to the applicant, tenants have not
been secured at the present time; however, the availability of Such
Option would be a marketing tool. The applicant -intends to proceed
with the construction of the pro ,4act as originally approved.
Should a prospective tenant require dock -high services, then
building permit plan &-ck would be necessary to modify the _.
project.
III. ANALYSIS:
A. Pro osed M1,difications: The proposed changes �J Parcel 8 show
two oading o`cks are added to the middle of thm building (east
elevation) as shown in Exhibit "C ". Eight foot :,,igh Walls are
provided on both sides to screen the loading doct, ¢ari li ty as
rewired by City code. To accommodate the length of a
ca:,'liner trailer truck and its arning radius, the entire row
of parking spaces along the east property boundary is
eliminated. Since the use is unkn?wn vie can only spOculate on
the required parking. However, the required parking will vary
ITEM H
7
4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 86 -09 - ModiEiFtion - Bixby ,
September 10, 1986 ,t
Page 2
with the uses; for exa,aple, a 65$ light manufacturing use with
35% office use would require 97 parking spaces. The modified
site plan shows 91 parking spaces are being provided. As for
Parcel 7, one lo3ding dock is added to the north elevation as
shown in Exhibit "C ". Eighteen parking spaces along the north
property boundary are eliminated to accommodate the driveway
aisle width fov the loading dock facility. Based on the same
speculation of uses (65% light manufacturing), the number of
parking spaces required for Parcel 7 is 75,parking spaces, The
modified site plan Shows 87 are being provided.
B. Design_ Review Committee: The Coral ttee r-,viewed the proposed
modification to the sate plan and eleiaiions as a Consent
Calendar item on August Z, 1986. The Committee recommended
approval of the concept of providing loading dock facility to
each building. However, the Committee was concerned with the
potential auto and truck traffic conflict (3 separate loading
areas) and the number of parking spaces being eliminated as a
result of the modUied site plan for Parcel 8. The Committee
recommended' t!- t the applicant work with staff in resolving
these concerns.'
In reviewing the modified silo plan for Parcel. 8, staff
determined that the above concerns could be mitigated through
the following:
1. The review of tenant improvements plans for Parcel 8'
through the plan check process would assure that the
proposed use complies with the parking requirements.
2. To alleviate the potential truck and auto traffic conflict,
the area along the east property boundary should be
identified as no auto parking zone.
IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve a concept of providing optional truck loading dock
facilities for Parcel 7 and Parcel 8, with the conditions as stated
in the attached resolution.
Respectfully sub
Br uller
City Planner
BB:NF:ns
1 4'°�
a �
[7
PLANNING_ OOMMI,S'�� ON :f ` REPOR7
OR 86 -0 - Modr�i1'ation - Bixby
September_,198�
Page 3
K` Attachments: ReWutfOR NO. 8640 for DR 86 -09
E'hi it "A - Approved Master Plan
Exhibit "B" -. Approved Phifse I r.te Plan
Exhtibi.t "C° - Proposed M4di fi d $ite Platt
'5xhib . "E" - 'Proposed Modified: E-Flevations
Resoiutibn of Approval
`I
n
i
I
7;
RESOLUTION N0. 86_90
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT R£VIEW N0. 86 -09 FOR A 35 ACRE
MASTER PLAN. AND PHASE I DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 2 LIGHT
MANUFACTURING BUILDINGS TOTALING 63,474 SQUARE FEET
LOCATED BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND PITTSBURGH AVENUE AND
BETWEEN 6TH STREET AND 4TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL-
DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on the 5th day of June 1986, a complete application was
riled by Bixby Development Ltd. One for review of th
and e above-described project;
WHEREAS, on the 11th day of June, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission held a meeting to consider the z.')ove- described project and
continued to June 25, 1986 regular meeting; and
WHEREAS, on the 25th day of June, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project.
follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
SECTION 1: That the following can be met: '+
1'. That the proposed project is consistent with the
objectives of the General Plan; and
2. That the proposed use is in accord with the
objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the
Purposes of the district in which the site is
located; and
3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of
the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific
Plan; and
4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
.r
SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on June 25, 1986.
SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 86 -09 is approved subject to
the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: ,
i
. 1, 1
Resolution No.
86-9
OR 86-09
June 25, 1986
Page 2
PLANNING DIVISION
A.
_Ier Plan:
Mas
1.
The Master Plan is approved in concept only and future
devetopment for each
oarcel shall be subject , to
DevelbPment/Desigr review'process for Planning Commission
approval. Modifications to the Master Plan shall be
subject to Plannipg Commission
approval.
2.
"Campus-like setting" for the Master Plan shall be
emphasized by providing landscape and hardscape along at
least one entire street frontage per pamel and by varying
the landscape/building setback beyond the minimum
average
4F ft. for Milliken Avenue, 4th Street., and 6th Street,
and minimum average 25 ft. for Pittsburgh Avenue and S-Lh
Street.
I,
Perimeter landscaping for the entire site/Master P,an
shall be
provided with Phase I develop�ent to emphasize
the image of the "campus-like setting" with a unifying
a
lands�. pe theme and continuous pedestrian walkway.
4.
A landscape program establishing installation and
maintenance criterii for the shared planter islands
at the
interior property lines shall be developed and approved
-with the Master Plan.
5.
A uniform design program for security fencing shall be
developed and approved with the Master Plan and subject
to
the approval Of Foothill Fire District and the City
Planner.
6.
Texturized Pavement identif;g pedestrian paths shall he
provided at all driveway
en`t'-,a_rIces and shall be of brick
pavers, exposed aggregate, braeni?-f+.H hed .
UU1 or a
combination of them, subject t'0_CIty Planner approval; and
pedestrian connections shall be
pr6vided' from the
perimeter sidewalk to the main building entrance for each
parcel.
7.
L"ation and conceptual design of transit stops and
Wated pedestrian facilities shall be
provided and shall
!,z subject to Design Review Committee review and approval.
8.
The conceptual design of the "Gatr=wayll a symbolic entry
statement, shall be provided to Ath
Sireet and Milliken
Avenue; and smaller scale project entry statement shall be
emulated at 6th Street
and Milliken, 6th Street and
Pittsburgh, and 4th Street & Pittsburgh.
14-9
. 1, 1
6. Detailed landscape and irrigation plan for the perimeter
landscaping theme for the entire Master Plan shall be
submitted for reviev,�-=4 approval prior to issuance of
building permits fcr Phase 1.
7. A continuous hedgerow to screen parking area that fronts
on 5th Street and Pittsburgh Avenue shall be provided.
8. Undulating mounding shall be provided along 5th Street.
9. All texturized ,pedestrian connections shall be of brick
pavers, exposed aggregate, or a combination of them,
subject to City Planner approval. Samples shall be
submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of
building permit.
10. * All screening shall be architecturally integrated with the
building design and where possible a roof parapet wall
shall be used to screen roof - mounted equipments. If roof 3
screen is needed, it shall be of an architecturally
designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with
the building design. Full material sample of such -roof
screen shall be submitted for City Planner approval prior
to issuance of auilding permits.
Resolution Rio`.
86 -,94
OR 86 -04
June 25, 1986
Page '4
B.
Phasel-
i
L
A uniform Sign Program for the Master Plan and Phase 1
development shall be
provided and submitted for review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits,
2.
Detailed plans for the symbolic "Gateway" ea try statement
including landscaping theme shall be,
submitted to Design
Review Committee for review and approval prior to issuance
of building permits.
3.
The 1st service roll up doors shall be moved closer to the
middle of the rear elevation for buildings
within, parcel 8
(east elevation) and within parcel 7 (north elevation).
4.
Detailed plans for public transit facilities such as bus
stop, and other street furniture,
shall be submitted for
Design Review Committee review and approval prior to
Issuance of building
permits.
5.
A final acoustical report to reduce the exterior noise per
the City requirements for 'lunch courts shall be submitted
for
0
review and approval prior to issuance building
of
permits for Phase is
6. Detailed landscape and irrigation plan for the perimeter
landscaping theme for the entire Master Plan shall be
submitted for reviev,�-=4 approval prior to issuance of
building permits fcr Phase 1.
7. A continuous hedgerow to screen parking area that fronts
on 5th Street and Pittsburgh Avenue shall be provided.
8. Undulating mounding shall be provided along 5th Street.
9. All texturized ,pedestrian connections shall be of brick
pavers, exposed aggregate, or a combination of them,
subject to City Planner approval. Samples shall be
submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of
building permit.
10. * All screening shall be architecturally integrated with the
building design and where possible a roof parapet wall
shall be used to screen roof - mounted equipments. If roof 3
screen is needed, it shall be of an architecturally
designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with
the building design. Full material sample of such -roof
screen shall be submitted for City Planner approval prior
to issuance of auilding permits.
Resolution No.
OR 86 -09
June 25, 1986
Page 3
•
9.
The Uni rm Sign Program for the en-1re toaster Plan shall
be
prq,yided and subject to City Planner review and
approval.
14.
Pedestrian plazas or courtyards shall be provided
immediately adjacent to
or near the perimeter greenbelt to
Promote the proposed "campus -like setting". These areas
shah be designed as focal points. Interior plazas or
courtyards, when proposed, shall be secondary to the
plazas
or courtyards adjacent to or near the perimeter
greenbelt.
11.
Architectural design guidelines shall be developed and
should incorporate the following criteria:
a. Architectural planes shall have variation in depth and
angle to create variety and interest in the !Basic form
and silhouette of the building.
b. Articulation of the elevation surfaces is`�ti,youraged
through the use of openings and recesses which create
texture and shadow patterns and provide variety :n the
building plane or surface.,
c. Building entrances shall be well articulated and
project a formal entry statement through a variation
of architectural planes,
pavement surface treatment,
and landscape plazas.
d. Accent treatment such as changes in exterior materials
and texture is encouraged in conjunction with
variation in the major form giving elements of a `
structure. '
12. A statement through the use of landscaping shall be made
to provide a visual connection between the north and south
side of 5th Street subject to City Planner approval.
13. Full material samples and color shall be provided for
individual Development of each parcel.
14. The Master Plan text and /or the CC & R's for Parcel Map
9896 shall be developed to incorporate Conditions A -1
through A -13, and submitted for Planning Commission review
and approval prior to recordation of Parcel flap 9896 or
issuance of building permit.; for Phase development,
" whichever comes first.
H--7
;a
Resolution No, 86 -gc( ,
DR 86 -09 v
June 25, 1985
Page 5
BY
ATTEST:
ENGINEERING DIVITSION
1. The entire width of 5th Street, from Milliken Avenue' to
Pittsburgh Avenue, shall be improved,
2• the parcel map relating to the Master Plan shall be
recorded prior to issuance of building permits.
3. Private drair,ltge easement for cross lot drainage shall be
delineated onithe parcel map, or provided by CC & R's. CC
& R's shall be approved by the City Attorney and recorded
concurrently with the parcel map,
4. Slone easement for lot grading shall be delineated on the
parcel map,
5. Vehicular egress and ingress rights shall be dedicated to
the City on the follnwing streets: Milliken. Avenue,
except for openings as shown on the tentative parcel map
and the entire frontage on 4th Street ana 6th Street.
6. Easement for shared access shall be provided and be
recorded with the parcel map.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 1986.
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOReA
--(7 ,;:� ') L
• �Jd/L V. V1161I 114S1L � n �
S
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the y
City if Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetinn of the Planning Commission held
or the 25th day of June, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, BARKER, CHITIEA, McNIEI., REMPEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE is' 4
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 7
I� —p
f �
C
Z
O
V.
m
n
ct
O
. 0
. ■
Y
v
�
D^
tii
A N
MO YN GN S� ~t
~.S O
y
9 t00 Z. g:a
a
•• o- b +a
�
n a p
iyT ^
man
N�
AA S6
'QZ
O
at-
-;79,
�
'
nab,
,o
o
A
ZI
a
o RUa nn
`
I V
1
.'�
r.a TC
Z»Y9NNy nsf
= '°'e" sa<
Nc �-f
�.°n 'sn�.n
06
3
sa-cN
a�p-.ne war nr.'
T IC gin^
�^ EE ^
6.a..aO j
AAT S
.rv1y y6H
TO.N
� n
T '°
K�O Z
,Srv.w
_� 7va pS...
N��N
�ND yt TN N9�
a.E rA
�d 05°..Sb yr`Ti�c
' SOj Pub
+a
C�wA
p
wi 600by 3yN
°.�A
j -•
�� =f1NVY P��a�.
^�nw
NQ
N6
Ya�a
C�.1
qg.
Nn
j. « yg'ua
H.
^Oy..�. A.-
R
iort
S
_
^'a
nK2
oc�y�
A
rdS
�d}y°^ �GO
a°
ao ^c
� o n m
►GS
p o
o
«
5L IIi ci
o
Z
O
V.
m
n
ct
O
. 0
. ■
�.S
46R
CnS.a S F.-
nom u•
I a�
s� js� c'v73naa
n...,y 'n r0 'f pr•a�
b N '• r .n
j�' A? SO p•. aaY t6w; Ob ^rX aO _� �S 7 3a •n�a
O b'O p ano Z O�'Rt ��jj aSS YS 6•� Lr �• SAS• 4
�~ AE S 9Cr <.T•y a,^'� 3°' g ... •iSSO'. nN ..L Ga. 4�1>'.M..
AAA"' NA> C 3 nYr>O a�. y. 6 'C '� VO.O
•'a >
'v Us
' n „�ppp. n ad•
' °a a Y °e
0 6 6' 2 p OOpH� 0 A. 6 4 1< ab O i 6 ,.a. +`. 61rf Z i n Y t a gal s
�4 CnA1hn �OO nt p ha�0- an >j.G GG yr ~1 nn a a ar
n rp r N M d
Y i 1 n n^ O r �f yS b O ^. r T 6 S •n N^ a S
b n, + • Mw Nnb >RTa 4' `!O 3.. N ��R �u1�
�` ° � Sba 't+ .. >; �ppn°blSf y. rM 1p< =0,� np^Fn n ^��•
%['. • A (T i. nfY r G
�4[ R NAV Zya�r C „7Y3 aeSi �� ry�.
N r
r.. N
^a
�� ynNN 3 rrj� _ a o 4n a n n3.N^
a... na �y i� r� ��n. "'aaa�a•r. a �� � b° r ac.i
�n r M QC w Y» a a
t, �~°.n� ;,WOO"sn =n ? �� mu SRGa s -+no
^r v
o S•CnA NA >1>R
'L
r`b. N
Ri 4.14.C. Yd Y ra T 1
+�•tn nb �+. j
4�R KG- ?Q p N =o3 �xN :�^ a
�?r y`G,r •� i�Cn4 ; T V: 3.7 Annpo�SUA •! p Cb A paw
b t 4 a •! 9 3 R 4 S A 3.
N 6' O r N ... 6 n s _
NO �dN�L QH b•
2.1Nf C a�a0. �•. a� NmvA
Nr n .67< 3 GLK...A $n nNRY "•a r a may. '.
ap •Qdf�• Gd N(G1D� 1�r <aa -"^b� O: i�� win S3 N
< v n w�.,.b oc -tar
N..3i m•c R�,o. o
mb 6bar n �MM T p. rN•t ^O �a • R gQo
O • a u yA nN n 40 � T •A`, 3 a
a �r a 4n NYU T6N R+Y rid ^Y. nu.
gr
�.N.<� a�N. Nnp Woo.z +^, -n -+a rY
r ^Y w'iP 'cN � N`Y�
ba 1 z r
gib. R
�” c� $ N °° R• Ric b. +snir.m e°.o�•
6
NanR�.� � a uG6a •ans�r 4. f
Yi n .,� o• ^r f
GA aN67 n�pC .r..n- n[n3•GO yV ni r6 Tea. n +07n
1 a -Sib r Nub ' K N 4 — r a �• S y R T .� C �.+.
1n A . nn N�O.ri NN r0 r6lry.1 >
0 0� n NN ro as �a n° r
o-w `a �. gno.r�p ° •.+[ cc>
N , T SWR bC NXu 1aTn
6r•
• � �� A `�G b • OA 1� ~M b C. Ld
Ong
'f 6 O' 41T a•C f>rl �O1M ..Ob« d'
• \ ^• K •cn n�c nn� uno•<
{ 14 -to -
0
1 1+ \ \J o•
1 i 9^ ,r._a <•C r••10 �.�.• �} doh a} C ;,} O `�..
A O;09n`R 5.-dR ^ N
�c
p,C �N �SCP D rb 06 -+ +� rJpO 3a� O
R.a �Or K SM1 �.d a•C. •= `. N wl SQ rOU] > <�
ptt Y ~ p
23:
� nr 8A y'3 "'tY � Ca bN^ Q.cO 066
�'��dr OC6A �w a��fw y1P? Cb. wµ p.A a-Z
K >.D M1ap• 117 YAR D9 2t Q6p C. D 9S�
DH °3'edRr rDtio y° rQn� m'D �n M^
f. zvn�a. -•°� .M1°.
z..
av a ebf ^
e a' I—
M1q O1..Q �1 NO-
is .
3� }V
K~ ° ^<
O' a ^• R� T'K 4 0
S a d ay w w
vDw 'o*�w �v vn an � a nr c�RO ryM1d
s1A4wa c a`� K: M1R 38 c M1� =TM1O -mow^'
OM110 Sqy Yid ��' .0 .�.�N S � titl O DPI w>
ND ��R d 7 ?. 90 jCr l�lS
�•6n� w � 10 n0 1R
noYd H +1Q S� � Ou d 9r xN �R~
Y9=5. oa. Iq to eM1n ^•. i >o via M1a son ao
ti
!.• io ►e
•r � K IA W
2w wmw
n.M1i•i m RRn
to O� IOO �. Ate° D 9 A Z zkt °•
n��n o•c �� °M1 �t Rd1°n�v�: :�i° " ° w� I a� dRsR
ream n N.a� +M1 4M1eloM1nry ]s''^1 ]�'- wQ• d iaa �'
R r,n 0 n ' arDR, i NyA O.l R W 7•p "@� y�^ Y1•f w
9R� 3 00 SN � ON 4 v�O> OR^ NV
'R
^.'M1w _ '9� a �.wR1C nS-] w Oa ObM1 _ aN O•G 6�
o^°" w'nvD _pwd _'o• d i.:�w �^ py[,v p
p.-.N NC nn ODA �A °A j���,OG19]Q A 3b� Sr. �.s-M1l ?^•°'O
r6 pCNW y2]'1 rn � XvOi � N ^^°
b _]n°aS 3,A oSw � DAN V. RN dN
RO dYR 1010` aa.NOl. fi. 1tl 3N0• lr »A Z °nu
d 9 M n r. N 3 •C O`er d� 6 G w w R^ b n -... Q D. � �. V. n ; Rl-
t.
0 OOw"1 IO cCn 1yG N10�n •l r,>>
a �w 6R0 o.yr.D pM1wwy °M1 ^ �x iM1-
A a ? N C -+ N x r oo p R ^ M R� ... a N
M1n r ��0^ k RyM1O°'q.N
R.r 1,•A •
y �Y � =
W
.M1P ~o.D p ^� ^'•1r. A r R N b1iS0
60'am w G019..3N M1�Or� >d R GA n ) O 01^R1
Rya. S •C 6"f ']lG AN 00 �. ... 1j =, V O Od
A • M1 '
dyn3 1 ��Y� -1 -�+�6 Oq�np� 1°a w�M
3� y°•d
61.. 10
Ad-
� 0 1 R1A
N -r1
Q 1
n
rf
Z
Z
V.
n
f+
Z
O
a
1
f
i
3Y..
_m
e1
Y
ain
m
as
3 'd
can
Aj o
n.19.
oSS nt
cp1r3
w It
A C
6
o,Rw.
C H
—
T'-'' N.
Y
°n`N' it
Y
HoN
a
° an T'y N
ern
N
Y
ov
3 oN.N
6
oC G.n
6^
'ci �• mro A a
p O r
R. ^Y x
Caro
Y
wro
Fyn °Z.
FIR
•W� N9
ro.Oro m3 SAnN
S n � °— r..�
a
,y3( Gd
aoz
N
u
go N
SYO.
a
�
.dp
Y ��
r
4•
d Oro..
A.
C
;
�,
n n ro
y r °n e.
a i ,e t
aS
'
Q.
V ^.
RG S
O A• OS
142
• �. �C
'
�•61.
n
`
c
c
m;.
° ... ...N'
oPm..��
�'n
I^
H °v :.«
�fl
rote rd.G
TNryA<00
C9..
A ^4 , roi�1�pp t b °pN
d
C
pdN
:�z3 ��nN
d
Nf1Td
A.
t�eR Y lea ��r4
�
A 6'••'IS'� G
A3 n
��
r n°•�,o„o
°°'�n °'-°n
R�z-'
-a �p ^m �. y.4 n.
a:. �.
�P
C yp .% °P
R••^ +.
^ �y
T tlr Y^ n cAO^,
• ro
P3 y..
TAO °^. .a•.
mrr�
O
N.S�>N rte.
3 G
n,0�
y C1
no
d n3�OS>>
QX�
�Z.NS
r ?� Sro
qro Rya
Elo
a-°i�D
t�h.
ff9
°yh
:oaf 1_.
0�3. 3.OQ
N
• _
= nn
m
3'•
r
nAl6f ro CDO Tt
NH
T� ••
>
� 06 •
Rrw
^
Z �, N�
p�G O.-iN W
n
`•�
vw
Z
V.
n
f+
Z
O
Ll
IHt
3 c c Sexy �
.^. s6dDn
'nt?O S yr
P O
dS0 >.KaN
O �
� 3
b cn
N e.
CM ��
OJ
4 (^i
� W ^
n
!p
IA I\
N qlz I
t
P
C
i� q yT
d
h y
2.1
c
O
c3 d
O
6
n�N
1i N� r
✓ T
� y �C
T
y
(��
Z
1 G
as
^ A
.nY
zlig w A
awl
✓°
b
l
OR
r.O
,-
.�i0.6't
�n36G
CIP ^n
�
O.
e1R
N a! 1'
i R2
•
d^P
o • O.^
�r
O w y 3
»�.0
90 �n3
0.�
�
bt'O b'.'
a ? ''
d
'.n.
...
O^
n
EL 3 ry
3^
O
3
r s.
e•pi �H>
p
b�. ^6
pOd
day Ox
AII. ^n
p d �d �
' J R
4S
n0_
°
N�
n°'
a-
N N >
4�R
pf 6Nb ✓
O
Oy
^
'
N. �O7
3-9
•KCr
R6 ��
r tib
a
1p A
4 3 DL G
�C R..O ISD
G>
b7
d.
la 6
3 c c Sexy �
.^. s6dDn
'nt?O S yr
P O
dS0 >.KaN
O �
� 3
b cn
N e.
CM ��
OJ
4 (^i
� W ^
it — r 3
� C1.
b onnoy nson
N~ O6�✓
A b �+p -•m ^O
3 e
4
in n p,b w
aN
O.y9 oanN 1pa
w >n'f
N 7 S
OOP ^
=b 2v V1dit
��•�• uV
Z yr^ N
. n
b n
1 ....
^
3�pd.rnis �yw
d
L..
fD
rt
z
rho
S d �6't a
4 N
SI
'f N O
♦ y o d
C
i� q yT
d
h y
2.1
c
O
c3 d
O
6
n�N
1i N� r
✓ T
� y �C
T
y
(��
Z
1 G
as
^ A
.nY
zlig w A
c r
�c
N
° i
v♦ d
6
it — r 3
� C1.
b onnoy nson
N~ O6�✓
A b �+p -•m ^O
3 e
4
in n p,b w
aN
O.y9 oanN 1pa
w >n'f
N 7 S
OOP ^
=b 2v V1dit
��•�• uV
Z yr^ N
. n
b n
1 ....
^
3�pd.rnis �yw
d
L..
fD
rt
z
d
I
.4
Jr _
r I
4f�
r�
ro
n
2
O
�ss
'e
•
1
ya
3
4
N
°n °e
r
r
d� •�'�,pwC
rY ti N
GTZ'A
��'
00
w
S
N d m C
O 3
M1 S O
AjM1 �'.
�L..T
Y eml
- R. >
W
i II
3 �� �
O
AR gII
3 °1
+ n
C
aT�
R_
y
a� a
m
Ha
6n
O Y
MS G
n
y
C
1
�
y C
,°�� �•�
c$� A
r
a r
ro
n
2
O
�ss
'e
� 6o fli=i
�9l
3
°n °e
r
r
d� •�'�,pwC
rY ti N
GTZ'A
��'
a
w
d
•
n no. yn.� inn ,� yII g o.,a
ry yo 3d
Nq
M1 eiNr
�L..T
N Y..s
ry.,
ya
m II
NTAR6 y. �:
3 �� �
O
AR gII
C. c•
._ rm.A
n 9
r•n Ap
R_
3 C V
a� a
C II ^ ' K
6n
9
n y
O.
Y +i O• n N y V r
•C r m Nay 1 .mom m O
y C
,°�� �•�
_
2-J61
rnnmpl.
a r
r T n j0 O
YN II�rtY
� m
� N M1 •
t�[S
r. 3 A
y1T dd
n
C e'
G y
�o nY..
p •c o
K � p
ro
n
2
O
�ss
'e
� 6o fli=i
�9l
�
rlY.'YyNe'm =V �y
?•
V y� Or r�1X M1
° �
t n w 2 ~' �_ � R N •C
r
d� •�'�,pwC
rY ti N
GTZ'A
��'
6 »II ``
e.
b y
w
.'I•A
•
n no. yn.� inn ,� yII g o.,a
ry yo 3d
Nq
-•inp m..
R
nom
m3 E,o
ya
m II
NTAR6 y. �:
3 �� �
O
AR gII
C. c•
._ rm.A
n 9
r•n Ap
�1
3 r n
O c
9
Y 3
O.
Y +i O• n N y V r
•C r m Nay 1 .mom m O
y C
,°�� �•�
_
2-J61
rnnmpl.
a r
r T n j0 O
YN II�rtY
pbC
n..i.II m�
mb
6
b N
• � N O � Y
O �
w O r ��i.
'
n
Y
O.
C YYi
6 3 O 44O
fY!T dRn
s '
•.l �. �'�
7I
n
ors+
n xc .r
6mE(Yyl
ro
n
2
O
�ss
'e
x
,.#�
S taa A l
4
N JO r. b a r
O O• S 1� u p N D 9 •1 -+-f
w
A.�1
> 3 f'1 A
n y R
121 D p b
> S 6
+°
AN
>>A
m
n
n
O�
b A b 3 R9
•c N
n N Y
N
Ap
tea'
a
O
r a
d 6 °1'1 '
A b
n.� C w
9 '�
•Cl
py4
o
rt,
na p
1p r
-
A
r
ZE
ar
c
a I
y
4C \ \V11t
O oa
v
ns
n < A ^
1"
�=
b eo
°'
0
n
w
Ore
2.3
....S °
ba.
o
r
�•s
�a
i ^; Sq
�N 6u sII`G
N
ABC
> A
wg-
M N°
na
3.Sb
A C N
zl N
>
1i>
io
n
n�
a
i
f 1 s
ry
i•t� a r__I'` �
Ii i i1z
i
@17J� f loll Jc
ITTp
O
S
Q
dft
L
E.
PART It UNIFORM APPL(C4TION
NON-RESIDENTIAL PRQJE T
SUiVitVlMY DEVELOPMENT TAB " E
Project Name Rancho Cucamonga $ :si ness mark Reierence Fife No.:
Location : North of 4th St. , fast of Mil liken Ave, (Staff Use Only)
General Plan Industrial soecii tc plan
Development Distrfet ; Sub Area 12
PROJECT AREA
Gross (incl. area to centerline of abutting streets):
acres: 42, 6-1
Net (exclusive of dedication for major external and secondary streets):
acres: 35+
AREA DISTRIBUTION (Based on Net Area) ACRESISO. FT.
% OF NE't` AREA
1.45 AC/63.474 s.f.
Coverage
30,5
7) Building: : 30%
landscape Coverage �• � 9: ($) Building 31%
Landra
Vehicular Area (incl. parking): Parking 49 % Parking 45%
Landscape 21% Landscape 24%
FLOOR AREA DISTRIBUTION BY PROPOSE USE (Based on Not Area)
Area of Building Pad No. of Stories Gross Floor Area (sq. ft.)
Proposed Use
7) 27,714 s.f, 1 27,714 s.f.
$) 35,760 s.f. 1
Lt. Industrial
35,760 s.f.
Lt. industrial
PARKING
Type of Jse Parking Ratio 4 o Spaces Reowired
# of Spaces Provided
F7) Stan,:ard 78%
85
Compact 20% 22 Max.
HCPD 2%
21
3
3
(8) Standard 78%
112
Compact 201"I 29 Max.
29
HCPC 2% 4
4
Total No. of Parking Spaces Required: 110 143
Total No. of Parking Spaces Provided: 108 145
No of Compact Spaces 21 29
% of Comcact Spare to Total Space
. ,
0 a L All"
WOW HmnoMM
(l Tl TiTTi —i'f i its 1I' rr
V
)4 -IT
I
F
I
.Y
s
' \ /
�
,
'
'
^-
I q'i
zi
Wr
It
`--------_� .� ._ 71
KIE
In
� ::
3�.: , .
N�j
}}� F
F� r.� ..
L
��
�.
�� - -���
�',� �
���
� �"
� �� �
N l
C.? � a. �
��
��
��
��
� w„r;.
,+`
��
��.
��
\�
4'1
•
3 �
£,.
�if �
�
�:
+ ++ ��
'�! itl
1�1
4F,
r
3r�'
,,,`i
•p,
i ;
�1 ,
�',� �
���
� �"
� �� �
N l
C.? � a. �
��
��
��
��
.
•
I
o
a.
v�
Af
oQ
4 - -a -,-I-
lin
cnff
. +4
{ -;
��
[���`
C
)� ---�3
ii
:�
Fah.
j
s �
r� EF
H F
q
A
��
��
z
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIVII NO.
86 -09 PHASE I DEVELOPMENT BY ADDING TRUCK LOADING
FACILITY TO EACH BUILDING OF PARCEL 7 AND 8, LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF 5TH STREET BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE 7
PITTSBURGH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PAPIK DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on the 21st day of August, 1986, a complete application was
filed by Bixby Development Lta. I for review of the above- described project;
and
WHEREAS, on the 10th dad of September, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project.
follows; NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
SECTION 1: That the following can i-a met:
1. That the proposed project is cori,; 4tent with the
objectives of the General Plan; and
u. That the proposed use is in accord with the
objective of the industrial :specific Plan and the
purposes of the district in which the site is
located; and
3. That the proposed use is in Compliance with each of
the applicable rrovisions of the Industrial Specific
Plan; and
4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
envir nment"t— and —tfiat a Negative Declaration has been issued DR 86 -09 on June
25, 1986.
SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 86 -09 Modification is
approved su ject to the following conditions;
PLANNING DIVISION
1. All conditions contained within Resolution 86 -90 shall
apply.
14_.��
I raw
Resolution No.
DR 86 -09 Modification - Bixby
September 10, 1986
Page 2
2. Any proposed uses for Parcel 8 shall be reviewed for
compliance with the current City parking requirements,
prior to issua:te of bgilding permits for tenant
improvements.
3. The area along the east pr!ferty boundary of Parcel :8.
shall be identified as no a6 o parking zone. Site plan
shall be submitted for Planning Division review and
approval ,prior to issuance of build ng' permits for tenan°...'
improvements.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY-vr SEPTEMBER, 1986.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis E. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Wlier, Depuq Secretary
i, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 10th day of September, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
}
t��
WI
`
�
/ ---__
~ l
wllvonAINuAuuuuAaumGA
STAFF REPORT
�
^ �
~^'^` `
°~p^�_~=V 1W, 1=00 en/
'
TV: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission '
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner '
SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-10 - BROOKS - Appeal of
staff's decision denying the instaliation of satellite
dish antenna within the rear 'd area of a single family
residence, located ai'6287 Sapphire Street - APN 1062-471- |
I. BACKGROUND: As a result of code enforcement, Mr. George Brooks
suRri-tt-eff-a- Minor Development Review application on April 3C, 1986,
for an existing satelifte dish antenna. The dish is locatizd at the
southeast corner of the lot, approximately 12 feet from the rear
property line and, 16-1/2 feet from the corner side yard- property
line. The dish is 10 feet in diameter and stands approximately 14
feet above grade. The dish is constructed of a black wire-mesh
material .
`
JI,
A. Based upon review of the request and field
inspecTfion, staff determined that the satellite dish ant-Anna
was not in compliance with the Development Code. Section
17.08.060 of the Development Code states that:
"Satellite dDab antennas greater than I meter in
diameter shall he ground-mounted and screened from -
puuJ Io view on all sides with m combination of
w8'.�° landscaping or buildings."
In that the lot is a corner lot and the satellite dish antenna is
located 16-1/2 feet from the corner side yard property line, a
major portion of the antenna is visible from the Lemon Street public
^v^^-~'-~~/' ~^~'' '~~'" that the satellite dish antenna sonu|u be
relocated to tile base of the slope along the north property line with
landscaping provided along the east property to visually screen th'.
dish from adjacent residences or that tile satellite dish antenna
should be relocated to the west adjacent to the single family
residence with landscaping provided along the south and east property
lines to visually screan the dish from the public right-of-way and
adjacent properties.
ITEM I
'
' !
'
�
IIi. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed project is not consistent wai;:h t.z
Ms-
0 J�6'— cElves to a development Code and the purposes of the "ai - strict J6 «'
which the site is located. Also., the proposed."projtct is. not in
Codejiancd with each of the applicable provisions of the Deuet;a�xnent�,-
IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff °recommends that the Planning Commission determine
k that the sat'e'17'111te dish ,antenna at its present location, is inconsistent
with the intent of the 'Development Code and direct the applicant,to y
° submit a new, appli -ipn, to reelocaate the antenna Ito one of ttie spec3,fiied
locations with approprfate screening to the satisfaction of ►e City:.
Planner. If thex. applicant is unwilling to, rctocate the antenna and
r properly screen it, staff would recommend denials.
Res ]y su tted, ;i
Bra Buller
City Planner
OB :SM:ko
Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Letter of Appeal
Exhibit "B" Letter of Denial (July 2, 1986)
Exhibit "C" - Letter Dated ,rune 16, 1986
Exhibit "D" - Letter Dated May 16,, 1986
Exhibit "E" - Site Plan i
d
r
7—A
fF
C:
A
t E TD �t1`+C 4s�i1CtL, L sE " :A a n
rice -} - �C�r?C�;�'Gc ir7c� "7C) �t�.�,-
gs �t,c b f ► S -tV %'t a Pic r .v3-, S i t t t 1 r -E
Y-) D other -'acts l kit �e' l a cct-ui c- =Cc_ ,')-, O ve
` t
it Our'
62,vergree n ► Q n
�0 tm iC�►�n �L Gt�vcc 1C nat have -i:o Sew
61zs�Urb her- LV3 of--
rn Ao)c -i eri C\A reGL6 t,
OL
where.,
- the I r-) D i . L' VAp mss A-- ) ClV'k q. g
_�Ltotc� e she c v - t C rl e fi.0 'P) CL Y-)
everctreen -Yews GC?ver
C ish 1r�►£n sit o-� Co p' p1ct+n-�(�-t }'-)-L ,
Ct n�.�`ESSar GtCt i � and
u-n r ectsto in a_b 4
A
i
I
/
'Y -fit A O-n e Ir' Y- P cl u ea-�S -ck., ni e e VI
-�v - CL\( -e
Gtr '01cLCe, -OLt ht's re�� Clenc
:Sbc-n � s
. �� %1 ,; --):,o €- acct (,iLCt tC,
CA-r►d Comp- -i�o CL,
rnCA fir.
it
t
1 'n
)ct' eC \:
29'
17 f�)
1
c�1CAlvtpA
i CITY OF RANCHO CL CAMONGA
Y
stay- JetGey King
et
_� CernNMt�Arrr
Charles 1, Bw It 1977 � Jon D. L+Likels
Richard M. Dahl Pamela J. Wright
July 2, 1986
i
George Brooks
6287 Sapphire Street
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-10 SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA
Dear Mr. Brooks:
On June 16, 1986, a letter was sent to your stating that the satellite dish
antenna, as proposed, cannot be approved at this time due to inconsistencies
with the Development Code. In that _letter, staff outlined two alternatives
that would assist you in bringing the 5ate0l,itP dish antenna into conformance,
with the Development Code. The first alternative involved the relocation of'
the antenna to the base of the existing slope along the north property line.
The second alternative involved a relocation of the antenna to the west
adacent to your residence. In both cases, appropriate landscaping was
necessary to visually screen the dish from the public right -of -way and
adjacent properties.
Revised plans indicating the relocation of i,le dish and appropriate
landscaping were to be submitted to this office by Monday, June 23, 198& As
of the date of this letter, no correspondence has been received. As a result,
Minor Development Review 86 -10 for the satellite dish antenna has been
denied. The denial of your Minor Development Review application will become - i
final unless an appeal is filed within ten (10) days of the date of this
letter. The appeal must be filed with the Secretary of the Planning
Commission in writing, together with the $62.00 appeal fee.
If you should have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this
office.
Sincerely,
I
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANN103 DIVISION
co Murphy
ssistant Pl ne
SM:ko
CC: Rio and Alcorn, Community Code Representative
-Tff.
'8 f n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA
Cu 0 N -OwJOn D. Jlikels
a c zs
E'• Z C.unFttm:mlen
Lq� Charles . Buquet 11 Jc[[re }` iiinl;
Richard NJ.I)aht Pamela Iweight
June 16, 1986
George Brooks
6287 Sapphire Street
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -10 - SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA
Dear Mr. Brookst
The additional review and site inspection requested by you has been
compI0+ed by staff. At this time, staff feels that there are two
alternatives available to bring the satellite dish antenna into
conformance with the Development Code. They are as follows:
1. The satellite dish antenna be relocated to the base of
the slope along the north property line. Landscaping
should b,c provided along the east property line to
visually screen the dish from adjacent residences; or
2. The satellite dish antenna should be relocated to the
west adjacent to your residence. Landscaping should be
provided along the south and east property line to
visually screen the dish from the public right -of -way and
adjk,ent properties.
In both cases, the dish should be lowered at least 4 feet from its
present height.
Revised plans indicating the relocation of the dish and appropriate
landscaping should be submitted to this office by Monday, June 23,
1986. If you should have any further questions, please do not hesitate
to contact this office.
Sincerely,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANN AG DIVISIO
o t Mttrph
Assistant Pi n r
SMtns
r
cc: Richard Alc.rn, Community Code Representative
9320BASEMIr ROAD. SUITE D o POST nFFICF. Box g07r • a1Nriln[.> r.�1ln`ra rrt*enTrzt,%ot: ^n (Tiat9A9tASt
' 1
t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
0 o M 3efPny Kiga
V > Charles J. Juquet n Joa D. Macels
19n Richard M. Dahl Pamela J. Wright
May 16, 1J86
George Brooks
6287 Sapphire Street
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
RE: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -10 SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA
Dear Mr. Brooks:
Staff has completed th61.r review of the above referenced project. At
this time. Staff feels t0at the location of the satellite dish antenna
is not in compliance with the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code.. The
Code requires that satellite Alh antennas be screened from public:-new
on all sides with a combination 'of wails, landscaping or buildings; In
Staff's opinion, the dish, at its present location, cannot be adequately
screened from public view along Lemon Avenue and Sapphire Street. Tile
dish should be relocated to the north side of the property an.'.
landscaped with appropriate screening - materials. Revised plans should
be submitted to this office for further review no later than
June 2nd, 1986.
If you should have any further questions, please do not hesitate to
contact Scott Murphy of this office at (714) 989 -1861. Scott is
available to meet with you and review your proposal or discuss -
alternatives should you desire.
Sincerely,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING OIVISTJN
BRAD BULLER
City Planner
8B:SM:das
9320 RASEUNE ROAD, SUITE C e POST OFFICE BOX Sol * RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAWORNLA91730 a (714) 989.355:
s
.Tri_-
sa-
:.. .... -_ :. = . _._._._ .. _ ... _ _. _ . .� � _ r _ � p' �_�_._ Rte, _�-� � ...... - - -•-- __.�
- - - -bL
1 vi
�\ h
$U F�