The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1987/02/25 - Agenda Packet070. -02,- 25--87 PC Agenda, non-contr0ver'2ut, They will be acted on by the Commtmion at one time withouu discussion. if anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 14414 REYNOLDS -The review of building elevations for 17 single family detached homes within an existing residential subdivision of 17 lots on 10 acres of.land in the Very Low Residential District (less thani 2 dwelling units /acre) located south of Carrell! Street and west of Haven Avenue - APN 241- 101 -17. B. TRACT 12577 WESGGN REVIEW) - NORDIC Design Review of building elevations and plot plans for a previously approved tract mep comprised of 16 lots on 4.2 acres in. the Law Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of 19th Street, west of Hellman Avenue - APN 202 -041- 03, 52. -C. %.10 , . e, �c c� CITY OF RANCHO CCCAN.Ci%rl. FLA v 1977 W- 5DNESDAY February 25, 1987 7.40 p.m. 1,10N'S PARK GOMb+fi my CENTER 91¢1 BASE EBB RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALWORNIA L ?',edg+e of Ti IL. 8611 Call 5 Commissioner Barker Commissioner MeNiel Commissioner Chitiea- Commissioner ,^iolstoy= Commissioner Emericki I1L moments. 6 IV. Approval oiVinu*es ,,. June 2$, 1,036 V. consent CO-1"* ar The foIlcwiir rtrent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-contr0ver'2ut, They will be acted on by the Commtmion at one time withouu discussion. if anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 14414 REYNOLDS -The review of building elevations for 17 single family detached homes within an existing residential subdivision of 17 lots on 10 acres of.land in the Very Low Residential District (less thani 2 dwelling units /acre) located south of Carrell! Street and west of Haven Avenue - APN 241- 101 -17. B. TRACT 12577 WESGGN REVIEW) - NORDIC Design Review of building elevations and plot plans for a previously approved tract mep comprised of 16 lots on 4.2 acres in. the Law Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of 19th Street, west of Hellman Avenue - APN 202 -041- 03, 52. i �} C. ;"TRACT 13318 (DESIGN REVIEW) MAYFLOWER HOMES - Design review of building elevations and - plot plans foi a ' previously approved tract consisting of 16 single family lots on 5 i acres of land in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling j units /sere), located fkt the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue tF and ManzsnitL ve �APi�',20,1-181-28. V% PtrkiLc Eftrinp The following items are public hearings in which concerneq individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name, and address. • All such opinions shnll be limiter! to 5 eieirlutes per individual for each project. i3. ENVUtONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIOXAT, USE PERIIIIT 8871 - ' iYIESENGER CROWN COACH t t The establishroent of a motor hon;e/bus assembly business p± 6a,",an existing 168,000 square foot industrial building, and tft 4;3,Qt7Q square foot expansion of the existing building on 11.8 acres of land in the General Industris+iMail Served District (Subarea 2), located at the southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Vineyard Avenue - APN 209- 012 -15. ( Continued from December 10, 1986). DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -13 - MODIFICATION - MESSENGER - The request t�mod' y the previously approved Master Plan by redueirIz th- . < <e area of Phase III from 4.4 acres to 2.9 acres in the Generai Industrial /Rail Served District (Subarea 2), located at the northeast corner of 9th Street and Vineyard Avenue - APN 209 - 012 -16. (Continued from December 10, 1986.) E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN J, AMENDMENT 86 -03 D - CITY OF RANCHO CvUCAMONGA - A request 'q sinend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Low Medium Dansity Rcsid antial (4-8 dwelling ui;its per acre) to Low Density Residential.(2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and /or Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) for 68 acres of land located at the southwest earner of Wilson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - A'?N 201 - 191 -11, 17. (Continued from January 14, 1987) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT ` 63 -05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM_ONGA - A ,request to amend the Development District Map from "PC" (Flood Control) apd "LM" (Logy; Medium Density Residential - 2 -4 dwelling units per acre) for 68 acres of land j located at the southwest corner of Wilson (if extended) and i Milliken (if extended) - APN 201 - 191 --11, 17. i I i e' F w� 11 P F. VARIANCE 8701 - LANE - A request to reduce the minimum :. front' t'yar setback from 37 feet to 31 feet for Lot S avid from 37 feet to 27 feet for toot 5, on a 1.65 ,sere tract in the 'Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), lorded ors the west side of Turner Avenue, south of Base Line Rte Ironwood Street - APN 1077 - 041 -69. ,d ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13470 - WDS DEVELZINT - A custom lot subdivision of 28 parcels on }' 7.94 acres of land in the Low Density: ltesldential District {7-4 dwelling units per acre), located on thy" east side of Ramona Avenue, north of Church Street., Associated with this application is Tree Removal Permit 86•-64 requesting the removal of the ' 6 existing (4) Eucalyptus windrows - hJN 1477- 301 -38. , ! H. CONDITIONAI, USE PERMIT 84 -42_- ORATE - A two year review for compliance with the approved conditions of approval of an established 1,650 square foot church within a 5,600 square foot multi- tenant industrial building in the General Industrial Area (Subarea 4) located on the south side of 6th Street east of Archibald 210- Avenue - APN 07-48. r� L CONDITIONAL USII PERMIT 85 -03 - CHRISTIAN FAMILY FEL€,— K&HIF - A two year review or eompllanve with the apps conditions of approval of an established 1,650 square foot cc)a6h within, a 6,000 square foot multi-tenant ' industrial building in the General Industrial Area (;_ubarea 4) located on the south side of 6th Street east of Archibald Avenue - APN 210 -071 - 47, 48, J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -02 - PILGRIM HOUSE, INC. •-'A request to conduct retail sales of furniture in conjunction with light wholesale, storage and distribution within an existing industrial facility in the General Industrial Mtriet (Subarea 14 located at. 12215-4th Street., AP14 229- 331 -13„ K. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 8512 - MODIFICATIOt - JEHOVAH'S WITNESS - A reques* to modify a condition of approval requiring the undergroupding of existing 1 overhead utilities along Church Street for a proposed church on' the north side of Church Street, east d Archibald Avenue - APM 07732i- 04. c L. ENVIgoNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TRACT 1,71057 (-MODIFICATION ) - THEFEMDSTONE COMPANY - Mod' ication to conditions of approval rto permit wrought Imn fencing adjacent to, Dew Creels Channel for Tract 130;W, an approved residential subOvision of 22.55 acres within the Vic:toria, .planned Community (Lowy- Medium Residential,. 4-8 dwelling units,' -per aeve) into 147 lots, located at the southept corner of Highlahil Avenue and Deer Creek APN 202- 211 -13, 38. M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDruosAL USE -The deve)Lpment 0 tied &auto psychiatric hospital,4approximatelj� 53,00f, sere foot rf, floor area, on 4.12 acres o$ land in the WustA4 !Paxk District ( Subarea 7) of the Industrial SWIM Man, located at the northeast corner of A.-fdw Route and Red Oair Street - APN 208-., s51-42. N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEir AND C0 1170,WA.L USE PREP''! 7-0, - LAN &t 0 Tlb es. , - ment of a building contractors OtRie and yard n an exist building, with a lease space of 1,640 ryuare feet on 2.99 ecreo of land in General Industrial District (Subarea 4) located at 9375 Archibald 'Avenue, Ste. 501- APN 214- 07148, i O. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-24 - THE' PLANNING GROUP - The request to emend the approved Conditional Usfl Unit -w adding business rrvedp art services to a convenience sales'._Ahd services develop roject on 1.18 acres of lend in the General Indmtrial /Rail f District (Suba rea 2), iocatt d at the ; eorheast corner th Street and Vineyard venue- AP' IT 201- 01315. (Contini y d Prom December 10, 1980) P. STREET NAME CHANGE FOR TURNER AVENUE - Proposed to be Haemosa Avenue, a north south running street om the Ranaho Cucamonga City Limits just nortY of 4th Street to its terminus at Besse Line Road, a ii,N,stanee of approximately three miles. Q. EN UONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANDL TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 86- 02; ;- WYSTERN PROPERTIES - i•� a- 'test to amend the Terra Vista Planned Community 'Ay ests5lishing a Business Puk Overlay Zone for areas designated as Office Park, C';umercial and Mixed Use, within the Planned Community boundary - APN 1077- 421 -0G, 1077 - 091.17. (Continued from February 14, 19167) VIL Directorls Reportgo A. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FOR TRAILS STUDY S. TERRA VISTA, MEDIANS Vt1L, :(3 'his is the time and place for the general public to address; the C2MMINslon. Items,, tm be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. l The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regutationt that set an 11 p.m, adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they Ahall be. }eard only with the consent of the Commission. The NannIng Commission will adjourn to a woeahop on February 26, G 198,7, 6a00 pm., at the Rancho Cucamonga Hgighborhood Center,, 9791 Arrow fighway, Rancho Cucamonga. The pjrpose of the workshop will' be to discuss Term Vista Multiple Pant ity;Archttecture> and Awards for Design Excellence. 1i> de !, 3antce Reyrtoids5 P%nnhV Commisatort Secretary of the City of Rancho Cuca monga, hereby certify, that a � lie and accurate copy of the foregoing aganda was posted seventy- two (72) hours pr:, =r to the meeting perA.B..,';674 at 3320 °CBa3e Line Road. i 1 {r� L f � aPifDlli OF IWLuEpcK,, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �I 11� lu /'ITTTi' Ah� T L tTIYTTA n - lrl: ± VS C4HAYl�11V l,Ul t1JX1V15lliEi GUCAAfo, STAFF REPORT 0: DA;c: February 25, 1387 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning C"ission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MtIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 10414 REYNOLDS - The review of DUIMIng elevations or 17 single ass y detached homes withft an existing residential subdivision of 17 lots on 10 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units /h(.pe) located south of Carrari Street and crest of haven Avenb;e APR 201- 101 -17. I. .PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: approval of building elevations. B. Project Densitiy, 2 „7 dwelling units /acre. C. Surroundinq Land Use and Zont�S : North can $ ow es ential (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) South Existing single family residences, Very Low Residential {less than 2 dwelling units /acre) East Vacant, Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling unitsfacre) West Vacant,; Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) D. General Fl .,^ Designations: ro ec ., _ ery Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) North - Very low Residential (less thar. 2 dwelling units /acre) South - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) East - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) Vest Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) ITEM A .. Ong ends TRP1 142o4mmii 9 O ACT , Page 2 i1 E. Site Characteristics: The project site is currently vacant anH slopes from north to south at approximately 7- 8 percent grade. ?tae site is bounded on the north by existing Flood Control District and vacant land, on the west by vacant and unproductive aglriLUltural land to the south by existing single family homes, and on the'east by vacant land. This site is subject to equestrian .trail' requirements. II, ANALYSIS: A. General: The subdivision' design was approved on ' Se"pt r 8, 1982, for 17 custom lots by the Planning " Commission during their regularly scheduled meeting. The applicant is now requesting design review consisting of 4 different ,floor plans with 4 bedrooms, 2 full baths, ^c or 3 car garages ranging from 2,740 square feet to 2,9x2 square feet on minimum 20,000 square foot lots. The architectural program has one and two -story level homes with 8 contemporary style elevations comprised of brick and wood veneer, "S" the and flat the roofing material, and eWcco exteriors. Many of the homes feature split- level roundations to allow the architecture to "fit. the topography of the land. B. Desiq_n _Review ittee: The Committee (Barker ' 101s oy ) rev ew an approved the tract's design elevations on December 18, 1986; however, the Committee expressed concerns over the privacy issue arleng interior bats fronting Street "A" looking southward.. The s Committee requested a "line of sfght" study from the applicant showing the wo,st case scenario (See Exhibit "'I -2 "),. The study indicates an impact on rear yard privacy from iots 11, 12 and 13 at the bottom of the slope. The Committee Prected staff to generate a condition of approval (set 'Condition #3) that mitigates the degree of impact while also protecting scenic views from Lots 14, 15 and 16 at the top of slope. C. �Equestrian Trails Committee: The Committee reviewed the tRa alignments on wo occasions. During the initial review, the Comnittee was concerned over the grading concept which did not provide for flat usable area for a corral or stable and still meet code requirements of a minimum 70 feet from adjacent residences. Also, the Committee requested a smaller front yard setback on Lot 1 to increase the rear yard opportunity for keeping horses. Lastly, Section B -B of the Conceptual Grading F Planning ConA scion Agenda TRACT 10414" - REYNOLOt February 25, 1507 Page 3 Plan- d7d not c-)nform with the minimum ten foot trail widt# required within the trail easement. Revised plans ` were submit+ to the Conn ttee addressing all the issues :. to "their I O:tisfaction, however, the grading concept for Lot 6 has�retaining walls adjacont to the trail easement which maxt trail a toels difficult. Staff recommends that a graded ramp down trs the trail be provides' to the satisfact'�on of the Trails Committee prior to issuance of grading p.�rmits. ' III. RECMENDATICH: Staff recommends approval through adoption of the "r a ace eso u ion with Conditions. J ctfull tt u e. Br i City Planner BB:HF:te °fah Attachments: ,approved Resolution 82 -87 and Minutes k Exhibit MAO N Vicinity Map Exhibit B Site Utilization Map Exhibit :Cm Approved.i'ract Hap Exhibit DO Site Plan Exhibit "V -Conceptual Landscaping Plan Exhibit -Y - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "8" - Equestrian Trails Plan Exhibit "H" - Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit "I" - "Line of Sight" Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions 0 Ja RESOLUTION NO. 82.87 Ask A RESOLUT } OF THE PLAK4, ING COMML�`ON -NE CITY OF RPNCHO CU NfIA, CALIFWHIA; `- CONpl.I0�,,r�LY APPROVING TENTATIVE 11CT MAP NO. 10414 WHEREAS, ientative Tract Map No. 10414 hereinafter "Map" submitted by Landco Development, Inc., arplicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in thi City of Rancho Cucamanga, County of San Bernardino, State of Califordia, described as a custom lot subdivision of iOt acres of land intJ 17 lots, regularly ca6a befere the Planning ComMission for public hearing and action on September 8, 1982, and subjen to atl conditions set forth � the Engineering anapproval lanning Div sionas reports; and Engineering and Planning nine Division's reports and has Cvns na,;Id other evidence presented at the public hearing, NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Ccamission of the Ci _.of_ Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning-- Commission makes ttt followfpg findings in regard to Tract Tentative No. 10414 and the Map thereoFn (a) The tentative tract is consists with all applicable interim and proposed general find specific -plans; (h) 'he design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site 'is physically suitable fov the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not ifk -ely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or— use of the property within the proposed subdivisl!. (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. Resolution Wo. Page 2 i a ; SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 104'14 a copy of which is attached hereto, s hereby approved subject to all of the fa111-1ring conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The apMrovai shalt become null and void if the final suhdi. sign malt is not approved and recorded within twenty fou� 24j months from the approval of this project un?i4s an extension haS been granted by the Planning Commission. BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION 2. Provide drainage structures for interception of surface drainage from equestrian/drainage easement along wastarly boundary and from lots 3,4, and 5 said drainage to be conducted to safe location for disposition satisfactory to the City Engineer and Building Official. 3. The rough grading plan shall be completed and .approved by the Grading Committee prior to recordation of'the final subdivision map. 'T FAGINEERING DIVISION 4. Developer shall construct the following items along Ridgeview Avenue from the tract boundary southerly to Hillside Road: curb and gutter aiorg the ;t side including drive approaches; curb and `guc�er. along the east, side including drive approaches only at the locations where a residential development currently exist;; and all pavement including a minimum 26 =foot wide pavement where curb and gutter does not exist on the east side. Sidewalk installation on presently developed property shall be credited toward system development fees. S. Developer shall provide a drainage swale along the north shoulder of Hillside Road from Ridgeview Avenue westerly to Hermosa Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. Developer shalt provide a roiled entrance at Ridgeview Avenue and Street °A ", and any necessary drainage devices at the intersection of Hillside Road and Ridgeview Avenue. 7. Developer shall construct a drainage device at the west end of Street "A" to drain the runoff to, 'the existing drainage channel to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. �J I: JAICK LAM, Secretary of the planning Coeeoission of the Ci'tlr bf Rancho Cumonggav cxn hereby certify that-'the foregoing Resolution arcs duly and 1 regularly introduced;. passed., and adopted hW the P14nning Comrdslion of the . City of Rancho Cucamoriga, at a regular m" iri of the Planning PIanning cow mission held' on the 8th daps of Sept"er, MZ, . by the roj, owing V.ota- to�ait. AYES: COM L%Id' RS: McNieF ,, ROWOI�-BIrker, Stout, King ` NOES: C MSI0NERS: None W ABSENT: COGAt4ISSTONERS None � I ,�,.) / MoOil'n: Moved by Harker, that the requirement for sidewalks be removed an that this be continued for a two -week period. The motion died for lack of a second. Motion: Moved,-by Aertpel, seconded by M^,Niel, carried to pt Resolution No. 82-86, approving Parcel Map .tf--, 7646 with the conditi ' hat the applicant meet with staff and the traiY}�-:)mmittee to insure t equestrian trail system have continuity through this area. Farther, t sidewalks not be required and that tha;�� wage dystem be designed per requirements of the Cucamonga County hater District. Mr. Vairin stated that this shoul a done prior to the recom*tion of the, parcel map.. Chairman King voted no o , s 'Witter indicating that his opposition has nothing to do with th '091 Via, itast twat hs was cat comfortable wit& the r resolution,, 1 $ e e h; 7: p.m. The Planning Commission recessed .10 p.m. ThR Planning Commission reconvened F. ENVlII0tRd6KTA4 ASSHSSlestST AND TENTATIV9 TmV, 10st'4— - 4 A proposed -: custom lot subdivision of 10 * acres or---- in the R- 140,000 zone Into 17 lots located south of Carrari, west Of Hhuen Avenue - APH 201 - 101 -17. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the stat`f report. Chairman Xing stated in terms of the sidewalk isgiae knd street improvements to the south and improvement in the proposed tract, thrt it would seem that `the same issues exist on this tract as the last one. He further stated that it does not make sense`to put sidewalks in front of the lot when the rest of the street does not have sidewalks and he felt that the Commission should make a stand one way or the other to require them in bath tractar or none. Michael Vairin replied that another alternative would be to go along the east side because of the lesser number of homes and make a requirement for the installation of sidewalks by each individual homeowner. He indicated that this could be controlled by virtue of the issuance of building permits. Mr. Vairin stated that sidewalks are already required on one side or the other on the southwest side and this issue should be resolved as to whether sidewalks should continue all the way to Hillside and whether it should be a requirement of this map or a statement by the Commission that they desire to have the continuation of the sidewalk on each individual lot as each lot is developed. Mr. Vairin stated that he did not believe there were any houses on the east side. Planning Commission Minutes n -91 -� September 8, 1482. l_, ` .l Commissioner StoLtt asked 4w there is a requirement for sidewalks on 24,00 square foot lob. Mr. Rougeau•replied that Q is the interpcetatldn of the sidewalk resalution thatfihey be required on one side of the street on coliaotor streets even with the equestrian area. Cc ,ssioner peepel explained that the former Planning th'afdeweik issue and adopted a resolution regain 1dawalk3o had studied `it33s nature. He indicated that one of the factors that enters intosthis tis f that an northtaouth streets there Will be a fair amount of Hater running lei' the gutters during rainy periods and that anyona walking will be -at the mercy of the water. He Indicated that the resolution was adopted to provide a safe route so that people would not have to silk in the streets. Commissioner Barker asked if on the souther corner of the proposed street there is a potential pookat for water gathering. Mr. Rougeau replied that it is; however, it goes under the sidewalk and is taken into the guttar. Commissioner` Harker asked what the pocket gees into. Mr. Rougeau /replied that the whole cul- de-maa will drain into the south curb when the street is graded. W indicated that while they only have the preliminary grading plan, eventually "this whole eul- de-sac will drain naturally to the west. Mr. Vrtrin asked if Commissioner Barker was referring to the cul-de -sac rather than lit 6. Mr. Barker stated that he was originally referring to the cul- de- sao'and then lot 6. Mr. Vairin stated that the Grading Committee has required an equestrian trail as wall as a drainkge• structure here. Commissioner Rempal asked if on the two Sots in question there are any just below this tract on lots 40-41 that have no access to the street. Mr. Rougsau replied that although it doesn't show of, the map, Vivienda Street goes all the way to Ridgeview and does have offers of dedication. Further, there may be some offers beyond lot 41 but at least before any permits or subdivisions can occur there the rest of it will be obtained. `,,'He indicated that the cul-de -sac has been eliminated and an S curare puc in to provide access. Planning Commission Minutes _10, September 8, 1982 fY LA MLI Bougeau stated tbgti lot 42 could be subdivided into 2 lots 1)ut Ulat before that happens, Viviedidi "would have to h`%,extended. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. ;pn Hombeolcrepresenting the applicant stated that they would accept all conditions as required and that the improvements: ito Hidgeriew will be tough He indicated further that they must improve the gullay all the way to -1 Sillaide. Commissioner Hempel stated to W. Hornbeck that sidewalks are required an the one side, There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. cbeirmn i31iz asked staff if they have any ides.about 42w many homes are constructed on the east aide of the 'tract below $here the present development is. Mr. Frank Williams, air A3aa+ liated Engineers, engineer an�jthe project, stated that the only house that is,,-* Ridgeview aii-edtly is the ��Ouse on the comer On the east Of Hillalde• , Me indicated that lot 42 ahciCl on the sketch Is redly not there. .hairman King asked Mr. Williaw assuming that he VantGd to pe. his sidewalk on the east side, would he wish to have the individual lot Owner put him own sidewalk in. He asked what can be doile about the house am the comer. Mr. Rovaeau replied that the(e aidawa-,'I"duld be installer= under an assessment by ttrs City or through funds that a• now available throtigh a state program. Cb.%—i am s asked if is mikes sense to take the appr`� -Oh that the Mty has suggested or if it makes seiise, to asks improvemedt3 along Rldgeview when they improve it, as it relates to that piece of progvety. Mr. Rougeau replied that this was klad of a subjective thing becA-use the sidewalk represents the same GxPen3u whether it,14 Iona now or as part of -the tract fee development. He Indicated t4at it, tecomes a.,mattdr of whether to impose the condition on the developer Ott his time. He indicated that the tract above develops will Z)a the major pedestrian flow and while they will be putting sidewalks in, it will be quite a few years before it will be of Pill value. Commissioner Stout asked what the current under,,tanding is with respect to the sidewalks on the cul-de-sac. Hr. Hougeaa stated that he would interpret the sidewalk resolution to exclude the cul-de-sac. Planning Cam- fission Minutes September 8, 1982 144 clyairmaYS King asked it-,the Commissioir,is 14 basic agreement that the sidewalkAV Should be dons on a lot-by-lot basis. 'The Commiiasion indicated that they would sfe in agreement with this eoneept. Commissioner Hempel asked if "the developer w01-ild participate in a -_ reimburt"ement agreement if the sidewalk was put in. Mr. Rougeau rsplie►d that to did not know. Commissioner ReMJl asked if #t would be any different than a storm drain agreement. Mr. Rouge= stated that the requiremant &ur ii, roving the s?reet to the full width is a dfSinage rtquirement more than anything lie, else. indicated that if the sideva'k ='d.> treated that way there Vestal have to be a sidewalk raimburaemez lagt'QoOftta \ Coomissioner Rempel stated that the owner ur t(ie property should be made to do it and that he would be aisle to use the 1911 Act. M ^, Ronson sfgt0d that the only time the',Aty enters into as, reimbursement agreement as such is When a tract iaaa provided What the �.*ityr -s Ordinance and state statute refers to as su,PIkAegtal capscity. He indiratild that if there i is an improvement that has been deae offsite atat has not been done for the F.,ofeat to provider larger storm drams or sewers offsite, it is common to enter into as reimbursement agreemeaaC. He indioa- that in this case, the paving of Ridgeway down from Hillside does not provide aupplFlaental capacity to anything and woul&" of be appropriate as a raimbursement agreement. Commissioner Hempel stated that he was not thinking of thiv as far as paving xs zoncerned. Further,' hat there im -thing in the sidewalk that helps him 'kit whatsoaver.. He felt that aidswatlkA should comae from the development fee. Aouzosu stated that there would be no problem from an Stigineering st"dpoint but ae would have to chMak io see i.f this t;ould'be handled under the Systems Development Fee. The consonsuo o' the Pl=ing'Comatission was that this should be looked + into. The applicant stated that if the coat of the sidewalks were aisle to coma from the Systems Development Feer, it would not affect them.at -all., Motion: Moved by Resmpel, se,onded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 8247, issuing a Negative Declaration and approving Tentative Tract No. 10414 adding the condition that the sidewalk cost be i';overed from the Systems Development fee for ttiat one lot. M:, Vkirin asked if the condition cannot be satisfied, should this item, come back to the Commission. Planning Commission Mingt.s - ±L September 8, 198 , 0 Ir x 1 The consensus of. the Commission3 was trat if the condition could rot be satisfied, the applicant w0juld not .have to put the sidewalk in. F C.N' Ct7H17YT MAL t+uE PETl = No. 82 -16 - WALL - The establiahment of an arcade the -1 -5 zone to be ioct ied at 968'T Base Line in the Base Linn V, Inge': opPSr& Center. City Plann ,Flick Nomez, reviesed'the staff report, He indicated that the staff report dvised that a letter would be forthrcpaing from the Alph Beta' Corporation; h ter, none had been rscei °t!d.- Commatssioner BarL skol it' theca donditione are identical to those placed on the other arcalr<, Mr. Giames replied that t are. Cammiasioner ReT tal asked i his could Le :brought back tr, the commission after sic months to be t the applicant wes conducting hin business in., accordanzi with the parameters, the conditional use permit. Mr. Gomez replied that this could b done. Commissioner Stout ached if thers was squirament, for additionml restrooms. Mt. Gomez replied that there are, Chairman *Sing opened the public hearing. 1 Mr. Ron Walls, 5081 Via. Paraiso, k1ta Lama, stat that the only condition that he Would have a problem with is the requiremen for two restroomo. He further= indicated that the Barra ►s P,4,zza in the saw hopping center has no such requirement. Mr. Walls stated that this would create a hardship for h because of the cost of installing another restroom. Chairman King asked Mr. Walls if hs had any knowledge of what a waiting time is gcing to be for his patrons. Mr. Walls stated the he did not kn:.a. Commissioner Stcast ststed that in his letter, the applicant has indicate his intent of keeping hi:r establishment open until midnight. Mr. Walls replied th. --; that had been a typographical error am that the operating hours would be until; 9.30 p.m. on Sunday and 10:30 during the week.: Planning Commission M3nute3 -13- September 8, 1982 C5-5� NURTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tnu.. —L4 PLAMING DIVISDN P-MIMT--�A-SCALEt NOI H RAINCHC CUCANrIONGA TITLE, srr vex PLANNING DIN"ISK1N • — ; r � � YACAry a4i -aa + F .i/K1SYeA' !IP/!4// �• t�' � �`f lt4vrrraaw•` ra ; � � ya.:�.. Q. �s -._ Alm L VACANT .. , Alrq./Yi RDIAl PIC - •��+xrap Arrr. y a j CRaYa "w, FAIRLY MWHWML YA�N4 1 6aQYa 1.PARCRL7IAP AYi ( 10.1.77 wwwa PARCRO: MAP 79a7 i Af NOVO MW NUR L H QTY OF l iTwM: T RANCHO C;LCA MONGA TITLE: PLANNING DI'VtSi N EXHIBIT. SCALE M gee s: rw: �w /� iidly IR1kt T.K oW7 IMMI LW. WSt Nc)IGH CITY OF rrc.Nr. RAINCHO. CL'CAmoNGA TIC= PLANKING DIVISOON MOM- sckLC =��_ I , a o NORTH CITY Or. RAINCHO CUCAtvloNGA -mu eav PLANNING DIVM.X F-XHIMTL9Z_PLC_ �I e g; t. a K �� du �.4 a rcrrr— � *wit i NORTH CITY OF ITC. \d: Al s/i RAINC O CUCAMO GA T=a C-W eg,p. a a—, PLANNING DIVISION `t — t G 4 • N UatTH CITY OF ram. 72A-er 6-9V14e PLANNING UIVMQN F-XHIMT--2L:-- SCALE- i �4 (�1R117 11i�1�1�T51■ i� � tics'r —.:. _ NORTH CITY OF. PAS." 2&4= lTC�i: RAI•CHO CUCAMONGA . -mu. �, ., PLANNING D!�'LSK?�I EXHIBIT: SCAt,c: ,� 19 F, 0 NOUH CITY OF RAINCHO CUCANIONGA TITLE- PLANNING DINIISIOX EXHIPAT- "Aff SCALD e L-A PLAN P. G�k CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CU A'jNvIONOr3, PLANNING DIVISOON F -XHI13 T-. - r2! p Zn 2 r NOlkTH CI'T'Y OF ITEM: PLANNING MOO E�Eitr �- � ' =� 5�►t.ir- �....: { 2 r NOlkTH CI'T'Y OF ITEM: PLANNING MOO E�Eitr �- � ' =� 5�►t.ir- �....: 1 i _ r isuit -M � I t IS #IL r, DLt� \!i(\� r ' 3.atC 66FMaf IGXt� --4 NORTH CITY OF PLANNING DIS`MO.N 3'- ErH«r: �..�SCALE'---z- 4 rs , 'Ile 1 r -T- __-� —4 p � 1 F6 o 2 \. r PTi �_�IIY4 MiUO_` id ld P_aB'�d�i I V I NORTH CITY or mat= RANCHO CUCAI�vjoNGA : PLANNING DIViSiON Et:MJt3ti= SctC _,.. 1►' Lor P. i�f)[ti;H CITE' or. RANCHO CUCAIVICXNGA PLANNI \G DIt'iSI()N TrrLE: SCALD i i RESOLUTION NO. A U 0 THE RANG C C RESOLUTION F HO U AWONGA PLANNING Ct1MiISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 10414 LOCATED SOUTH OF CARRARI STREET AND NEST OF HAVEN AVENUE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT n;APN: 201- 101 -17 WHEREAS, on the 5th day of November, 1986, a complete application was filed by Art Reynolds for review of the above- described project; and WHEK�AS, on fAe 21 day of February, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commi!iaion yield a me ,ing to consider the above - described project. NON, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved V5 follows: _ SECTION 1: That the following can be met: i. That the proposed project is consistent with t4a�_ objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord .iith• the objective of the Development Cade and the purposes of the district in which i6e site;,is Located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable pro -, i(sions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare;,,, -or materially injurious to properties or iw.rovements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tract 10414 is approved subject to the fo o -w-ig conditions and attacned Standard Conditions., 1. All conditions of Tentative Tract 10414 as contair:;_- in Resolution 82 -87 shall apply. 2. All retaining walls as shown in the conceptual grading shall have a decorative cap. 3. Lots 11, 12 and 13 shall have clusters of 15 gallon evergreen trees planted midway up the slope to mitigate impacts on ;irivacy from views frog Lots 14, 15, and 16. Details shall be provided for on the final landscaping plans to be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. 4. All wood fencing shall be stltned with a water seal coating. I'M 4F 7 , PLANNING COMRISSISR RESOLUTION NO. TRAIT NO. 10414 - REYNOLDS ( �. February 25, 1987 \� u3:a Page 2 1 The flat bottom wr r� =, flf the fender tra west of - Lot 6 shall remain at 15 feet, but should reduced a on the south side of Lot 6 to 10 feet to duce the s height of the retaining wall. 6. A return wall or stained fence shall be prove for o the north side` of Lot 1 and elortg the west s1d6,of Lots 13 and 1C \\ 7. A revisO grading plan which provides for horse ac,cen to the trail on, lot 6 shall be approved by the Trails Committee prior to issumee of grading permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25Th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1987. F: PLANNING COMKISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman k ATTESTS ,: , Brad Bu I I er.--�Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of 'fie Wnnirg Commission of the City of ` Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify Uat theJoregoing Resolution was duly and G! regularly introduced, passed, and adopted ter the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting p"e Planning Commission held on the 25th day of February, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: C"ISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: t Q I.: r •G d 0. Y yoo -etNO' V� Y fi:YVgs 's •yQ.O 9 Y ° Y„O. p�9 M of LOC. =� PQ`s N O C.YiY a�NUt ��. Nei rB.s+ L6,YMU Y <0�. s Y v cat YL N <L Q}.�Y OA° wNYti� �VaO� y� �Y�MY YVY 6V�uw G.aY.'.C.. C R �CCa5 yi w�0i. wuag t4� a e� .y N u b:5 TJ ZX ��Z'a�. °a� �a�4i ■ ■Op s'3.aa. � 6N��". YIII L yy 1 CVU u_L Fad — y" {w. �• �� G� Mfg- 101i" «QKG CC Y- WWY • y.. YY rT� .GG L(C�YC N�m�O Y4C6y, N.p� Yy `�wgYql.p �v%�y�t?� �oa'nr ¢aYa+ c +'� .�'a .Y•.� Fot °O$. SL ai a N f m • 3 pNN -:2 Y NN dY �L��1�.�pA lvi dC a�Y SQ It YU9y yNe�Y� S Z <Ond O^'y yYksi O � ` �;` Y '•3 O MQ'Y — C u C Y Q � 00 3 pp�QVJ�^ 'O O J V Y N 4 YY » A q S� Y K -ss �yAUi' .CN :Hb�b `16 Cj p n2 w a4w tl N PK ` tl r v ° O � 3 E ♦ N KIZiz O Y Cam~ G C�5 Cpnl yyc� LYj 4A o M tl ` tl r 'n UGar. r�'•E� p °L p�VL3 zatzi p,, 4y 8[w yi Mµ'yd � A Ujg �O tiMY qqV " ° `gp H # A.e p✓Aiaif "� �,xv �i. _yyyyyyGGw \'� Y -.46t; E$ LG YY = 4TIZZ 715 Xx 70 z „N^ c y«N L1'CYw. Vii T NN�aX°�a.�i it,A ° °� I��o m� 1w to Z=13 1 L a{�� pa� p } � r�� OA• S4 66 Y YY �M`k� � f'r MM�^.Eap+CR, WwsT+y QII tiL+F•µ� Nf. all kz I �aYU �I ui94 L O SYtl se Myd +..48 Ct •! °sM S- µt LNE �O�tl pL� Otl� yp O � IL Qr F�y CY� i, -��yyn lcL-1 �7 S tl;� z Ay .74,-:: Y. Xa4� y Qvp YS Y O :5 -Z {�{.. NL 1 rCs CC u V T d O4lgQ 4� yC L r~+ .G y N Q G� -.2 -1 N V y NEr0T� ^ q 9 = L N=S5O L ; pp1G GCO G nMYtlN VO 9 N �G Cw's— u Y� Ol �Cr1^ L^ N M mL �4pi L c9L �° Yp 1 N Vt� r tlwtl �6L Q. rrJO Ge yL1�0 ^d w --L WSJ GGo p.� N.A. NCVc yy y- ,r0 "y� NC Eu,i4 YY lT0 COQ L.r� ^Y. 4C. Q QQ�.t .y 1�Y4 C� SM'.Y�4ae�afT i 0 � Y tl OO P9? RyyILY LQCC q 0 L w 6 R CL n ^ N p /- S N d K^ N a N 4 4 K Y 1 M'O C -Y 4 A Y N ;19-.3Gp YLYC:1 p��yK ^� wL 4`YQtl. St1�L. j6 ESQ- � t G�sa2 �y p_ LL O pp9y *� _ CJY N VOtlO MLNUQ Yp y Sy �`.ujO uOCCYUy rv,�G ll� .i 5O N`i �OV Ypi M ig Ru,c3$Spp. �:: 6 °t L C•ti S G i aNi p G Y 3 L Ttl`s� c o �aa.a 94GLytl Q dt r. Y 4► 4tl�1 Ctl�uN • O err w GCL. OC r�p~TO Y 60 D?yy G V' �O nCZI- tlO6� v Mr.0 NLR Ir -�q�aV NU 4 a N t C -• ^�._C L.s. a� 2 ate$ a '�'aI c$�'-sie �•D �'c'Y �i1°r COL�O 0�9 UG r++L Lyys� Or.. wry "'rN06 ^er PV 04 ®C r.0 V y^ 9 C Kay=C Cti Y`� L VmN Y ° t^ eONLGCq� —S. pV N C n {� g M N[ Cpp pF E��i YeP kN L)9 7 LL Co 64g4- 'y�'pV' L YOC Ud qYy L ♦Nw JlC4N _6� ^yY.O yLY pp�L +O 1tr PO� a9V Cyl��L q_PN.�y LL�O�f.. 6 pOC� LV aL.a °R LAY d YD NMOyC 9 E1 S E'�1 yy U^ Yyom. -egg.- CA Y.G wyC. �Y N O L^ Y .� O y 4 W C O Y_ * G� .'rte hr L N L ■ ■l ■E C t yy a. N O Y L 7 Y 9 N YG r®0 n• V i AA .9- C r.. C` Y CN � yy O .7C''.i 1,- N L i N V^ P Y 01 q M ri'O i 9^ 0 6 .0 Y IL i3 S, N Iz M Pof& 4a imp 21 .-° ° ou x ar s i 4. .M.Y Cy4 Nv0.=Y = r. Ul�Le `+L.3a NG� iN4J Pi.-r^. _a o2'- ,N Ti u�ac s �.c NreN �S ra v—p O°iE o- m a. 'i^y ro m� 4uYiD b. N YU 9 y„ t5 t ^ USNN tt G TO rLi 1G ¢�Ly J]� pr =.06 g4y66p �$, 0� a09 Y.� q9N d e L.� -Lp L`V ^9T{p '91 Dy"�96 L> P O •°- C - 9 �, 9 L V t C a qk o_�oo Nr °eg Qtw u. Y > yLL a Nccpu o u..'.°.rL a::-4 u O1`o^ arL a` 22 zwy �9-g ti d eP ;�y p C 3YC1 < C V O if °i9 r]�N .�� 9 C ✓ie ° 6t' DWiU.�n^ a y O'CG.!C � ✓wt Y 6�� > `e V.N■ q P U CUZ 93 5 L e or VO p q iU i9 rON 9 i°Cl6 C iN6 6Y6 ps. 1%i +°+r°w _ ! r yil�, � �aav � ��I a c - -, r_ a a Ldc�NA9v c cr Pd itE . 'J � �c Y ► ►a°. a a x x c c`�v.dam o�cs'O. c c uA °- } c cud' so •� ^ 9 0 K 6 ° ° Y 6 Cy L LVa� L Lpam.. �\ 9 ^-,.Nq � �i �*� n YO 6 pQ1 v9a D'�U ° °s a� t u nom: v Y'F p u.Yr ^+ V = T TO m myq e N=am jy .n =4' e e �` eOC NN m� a aySj! G N aN O S T Y 01 C O« Y Y C C LSZ: u+ oa9m yq.�p Y. y � y • L O C Oy oax1`T JiY u.�y L%� Y ti 60Y CC CA OC • p y, ,.0, y`J 95�'.• -6 O q W L i y .t Yt °Cy 0,0 `CYCY Aa @Z $ ` f ji' O Or aoQ x, q 8 a o d LVY O O Aar -.—Ss L L ' . NSU 01 b.f 4.AG� NrO u'SW °g L Y :. 3 N GLEN F �Ly�p pp E a u utco qo 0 Z CAL C i yy � •I^ N�V. @ 9 ti pp T .n 9NQ� � 1 p1• l • 0 GOIYrN O so 0. N N d b� WV N Z 1 C r C U .• Ly� S L qeY ° NO Cg O U p yYl a'=''Y CCYWfQ 9.tia �' Y � S pLL LL O1� LPC ^C.6 O'•L' a 6�CC C,A _ Yy s 6�C R 4 �rY L ^N S^ L� Y dip --Z ^ �YpA1 n c L, Ob Y a� YYg �S d?° 99 wlM 6C 1,2 �O ai `T6 54 Ny 11 7I O S T Y 01 C O« Y Y C C LSZ: u+ oa9m yq.�p Y. y � y • L O C Oy oax1`T JiY u.�y L%� Y ti 60Y CC CA OC • p y, ,.0, y`J 95�'.• -6 O a. Yy y .t Yt °Cy 0,0 `CYCY GL 9iY Ya ji' O Or aoQ x, q 8 a o d LVY O O Aar -.—Ss L L •i `C"" C u'SW °g v �qt fl Y Y 2r c �Ly�p N�NY ° wO.w CxC O O•�CyY V e-yCC Wp p_ C. �u VY.N Mqa C V Ii1 L • 0 GOIYrN P +c. $1i� O N N d b� WV N Z 1 C r C U .• O ^Ll.1 N NYO.. yy9 ■Y. Y6 a9� U ^� N UUM y:T L. �O lM G� y °Y. Cy Cn T�� cep q10 CPgtd. Y ti 60Y CC CA OC • p y, ,.0, y`J Ilk 9 Y Yy iy x yi. c 9iY Ya _ d A6U lu s LVY O O Aar -.—Ss L L •i `C"" C °yam ryp ° Y Mqa u°'b`,CO� �o >•tl v g�TC 2dOG C r C C OpY Ly� S L qeY ° NO Cg qY^ QO v yY _cc pU yoY �D�y O1� LPC CV O •' Uy tFS �Ly • y V _ Yy s 6�C R 4 �rY L YO S^ L� Wy.N 1.1YiC YYg �.0 d?° 99 wlM 6C 1,2 UeU `T6 54 Ny C.v r3 YN J L C Y4 UNZ c O N YSY C Y4 OSY C 6 }e a1a lY'.` bUN� q .G L1i �Gp `NL1a =. NY4p N� N c0 6 ^pO Ywy. �,. b. �`O pJ`` a^ W CY60 01 C H. 'O LN { ` 0 A OAp� °OsN =Wy Y 1••N6L N a -^ x s a Y L 3 �_.� V wy � acrd N xjSAp wd ce e�YOO G q C N;`• C NNg p. uc U „c.�•"1 E1 Yp Y .� ✓ 4 CC'O^ °Uq _ 6 C'Y Owe« o N C O SA C1N N.� Y ` �tr OG6 W LS Yu ° CC y'ka W r C Lra Y Ult L NOO/�/i1� Ch u�lyY OlS .� � O e qcU� 4C� O Y�w r�qL�cc1 U WUO. W 8T YA•4 � �I ,�� I w� �I N 1 M 1 V N Hf a ^I �•I �� 1 r V F a o`�!Q —Cw YY L i1 ij ✓�.» �Ca A9 �Q R�C�`� V $yL Yr '�� y� ji ��, s• � Yy r pa �O� tlL 4 sFi R. L. E Ny j 4 u•' M (J + � C°nq IbW�4 6l�O:yQ M•�i � � ��C rA VO� � -'l.' N ♦� ii V uY W J N 41: =ii � Y +Np b� e� J Y NCi �j c i.`e�® N �t.Vep� VpyCY yYNNjri �9 o�t'3mG$ v5 r Ln i M 4OlY. `` by — � �LCQC1 � p� y, U��CII �p�r Yr ai � � • ° Z.,c¢C yycRCF zo to Cam. �� -�� ,QKC a{ON� p Y! y7 � �p Q�Tyyi+1� �.U.U�g NLU. j•—�• C¢C.Y.y_, x- N- r ^� - ¢�•' nom°. 9.: + r o dog a -° Qi i' u�a. i qy qC1. N.prrL. C rJy - V N r,�1.N Yoti.R E Y N Yy R V.4 p a y x n OO ! 4 Ld * 44iY`: M °. yt N'#"N.• -d O V ®� .�tliby °sa. OD. N 2- D24 4M �V ~arN± S G= +ywg. � D..y M �qN K 3 �O • a � N L: � V V y � M� 11 Sit • Z NV/:..y ■; .r.��,"W �yyryr _p�. q Y� ^a5�{�� N °�q �4 �� y� � {tip? O�YfN C'. mY r 9i 3°MV ..IYY K $rte s_» W� 8 � ADU w$ 'tix s °Sv:Pv` 3%1 aT,�r sue` DN r D]1D aw I. 4W Y py 9pp Mb1 = N °Laui g� g€ g i0w. C N �u- 16 wrC ND �pi N CO Dr D w� Y9CC �x *. µ0py S ya 9: k KSF W i V.A <.4 y QJ T r wt N � BYO li v� -3 C V Yp wG ti a .� atia art TsY+ a M It a.�; � aA e wry O w L •' b w N p`. ��yyWcC Cyr C. CM1 �.� .Jy° S1 »v GN •�N 1 M� a 4 '� �^ C • b Lam^ Y • Vim gy "°' A lbw a. <�4 k'1.a `v4 0.NV N.Ae 4� K6W `3 .43 N N o of V¢$ K K 4 }�pI m, Mi� � �� a aD D DY N N.R� YV li � �i. X9\2 S L Y�{. i aq p p� AM Ld * 44iY`: M °. yt N'#"N.• -d O V ®� .�tliby °sa. OD. N 2- D24 4M �V ~arN± S G= +ywg. � D..y M �qN K 3 �O • a � N L: � V V y � M� 11 Sit • Z NV/:..y ■; .r.��,"W �yyryr _p�. q Y� ^a5�{�� N °�q �4 �� y� � {tip? O�YfN C'. mY r 9i 3°MV ..IYY K $rte s_» W� 8 � ADU w$ 'tix s °Sv:Pv` 3%1 aT,�r sue` DN r D]1D aw I. 4W Y py 9pp Mb1 = N °Laui g� g€ g i0w. C N �u- 16 wrC ND �pi N CO Dr D w� Y9CC �x *. µ0py S ya 9: k KSF W i V.A <.4 y QJ T r wt N � BYO li v� -3 C V Yp wG ti a .� atia art TsY+ a M It a.�; � aA e wry O w L •' b w N p`. ��yyWcC Cyr C. CM1 �.� .Jy° S1 »v GN •�N 1 M� a 4 '� �^ C • b Lam^ Y • Vim gy "°' A lbw a. <�4 k'1.a `v4 0.NV N.Ae 4� K6W li v� -3 C V Yp wG ti a .� atia art TsY+ a M It a.�; � aA e wry O w L •' b w N p`. ��yyWcC Cyr C. CM1 �.� .Jy° S1 »v GN •�N 1 M� a 4 '� �^ C • b Lam^ Y • Vim gy "°' A lbw a. <�4 k'1.a `v4 0.NV N.Ae 4� K6W 1 Q Z AOL r �u_pL, •J. o �D -: Yom^ Vie. ` ti�yc ��■ e1 N 3 $ C 5�;— �°'l ilk Y til - oL 8�gx °� * E?y� coq Gp E Iv12 pe g°Syyy Yr >� � _ 9 °p V N yY� 6 tyub. Y 12 yLyw Y�x .•• C a N��Yti Y4s � qN GIN �> Y •�Y Ya6 y QEOW L ^^ i W N �.L 4 y C peeY ��. �. Cy^� s� �0 —O .M .Z ss. gpLL ��YU y[3w ��3C Ly NY M6 CU. �1 Y� Ca? N^Y it °, Y.L, pp c aEn na. ` .- Y Za 0.Y Y y C C •3 N C � 3 614a LqY. H N.a C o d CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT cs rx r o a z v a DATE: February 25, 1,987 yF isn n TO: Chairman and ers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant PTannerrm"°°= SUBJECT: TRACT 12537 (DESIGN REVIEW 'NORDIC - Design Review of buuil` ng a ev o nd p o :-.plans for previously approved tract map comprised _f, 16 lots on 2 acres of land in the Low Density Residential'District (2 -4 dwelling units per acrs),.locatedzpn t th side of 9th Street, west of Hel ima-Y Menue= - -APfr 4041 -05,; t2. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: ` A. ^ ^Action Requested:, Approval of building Elevations and plot plans. B. Project Density: 3.8 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family resi ential; Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South - Vacant, Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Sin family residential, °i:ovrOensity Residential (2 -4 d� /ac) West - Vacant, Low Der'tit�NesidentjAl, (2 -4 du /ac) D. General Plan Dasi natiottr: - - Project SME - Low Density R6ffcte5tia -{Z- 4- dufitL North - Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South - Low Density Residential 2 -4 du /ac) East - Low Density Residential j2 -4 du /ac) West - Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) E. Site Characteristicst The site is currently vacant: ith a four percent s ope rom north to south. The Beryl - Hellman flood control channel is located at the southwest corner of the site. There are several mature Eucalyptus trees located along the 19th Street frontage that must be removed to accommodate the widening of 19th Street. ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TR 12577 -DR NORDIC February 25, 1987 Page 2 B -Z II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: The ;Planning Commission originally approved entac ve ract Map "12577 on January 25, 1984 as a custom lot subdivision. On January 14, 1987, the Planning CoWssion approved a one year -time extension in which to record the final tract map. At that, time, the Planning Commission added a condition to the tine extension requiring an in -lieu fee be paid for the future undergroundiag:,of the existing overhead utilities located on the north side-, 19th Street. B. General• l The applicant is pro;:osing to develop three, ,single story our plans ranging in size from 1,225 square feet to 1,670 square feet in -area« Three elevations are .proposed for each floor plan. C. Design Review Committee: On ,0ecember 4, 1986, ',he Design eview Committee Barker, Tolstoy and Buller) reviewed the project. The Committee stated that the building elevations proposed did not provide sufficient variation to disti, -44ish one floor plan from another floor plan. Also, the Committee stated that a five foot usable yard area be provided on side yards between the buildings and the top or toe of slopes or retaining walls. As a result, the Committee did not recommend approval of the project and stat_Ad that revise-a-ptannss should be resubmitted to the Design Review Committee for review and approval prior to scheduling for the Planning Commission. On February 5, 1987, the Design Review Committee (Barker, Emerick and Coleman) reviewed revised elevations which included the use of a side entry garage on Lots .9 and-Ur The Committee recommended approval of the elevations with a condition requiring the installation of a window on the front elevation at the right side of the garage for plan 1670 B (the side entry garage). III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff reccmnends that the Planning Commission approve the building elevations and plot plans through adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions. Resp tfully su ted, d Brad Bulle City Planner BB:SM:sgr B -Z PtANNING.0 ISSICti F REPORT TR?S7- ! - IC ; February 25, 1 VR7 ` Page 13 , (, Attachments. Exhibit "A1e - Site Utilizati-on Nap Exhibit; "a•, - Site /Grading Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit 100 - Building Elevations" (devised) �? Exhibit "E't -- OrI9 nal Building Elevations Resolution with Conditions } dalk J 4 v , P f i r 4 ' a ' TILT 125iT 4 + «— «v« « yet 13 ,- ,,.,, EL *me « « • t� — .Numb T1iLE =-423L ChlCtzml�Ti0l�f Pi.Ai tIl\G DiVLS'IC'�I , EYHIBIT I* SCGALE, ' m� 1z A fir+ Vita ...,¢rarr ■y:. '° I -P ((j "' WR a kvP If .;i l' �• .,�•.sm,,�..., ^•rxx 12; f MW '? w t y i b R; CfY OF tTE.tii: c 12577 . r T ft-AMINO MIS" .�.`--- --Y- Cg t s- r CITY Of. RANMO CLCAMONGA TM2, ' 14rVA1 �CEN /an/s E r �MI[I1I�tl � �� . 4 ,� �. k\ �; � • .� w. �� y� �! es�r � Brae . �«:` .a�atin`t� ��.� JMrt.�, a tir � ter, � �� l� � a��t � �±s . . ,a�R` ��rr�® �� :�.�� ....� � was■ 's�esu'� Aft _ r CITY OF T TE =. -isr� PLANNI,Nc Dlvlsm �i3' F-KRIBM S -7 tires e: s. ,� i 1�,. � . t 1 n 1 ��. ._ -" I 1 MY CC. PLAt'dNM M. S riAWL 3 CITY O NCTY -) CCCAs'l aNGA , , fit crry OF RANCHO y� /�q�� tTEI% � l�l1t \p41CV Lr�.sT�.�lt11�T 'j'j1 ME. -_,r PiAIt NI IJNG i7iT/�,SiQt�i '� �:GHltsit': S \LE. c AOL 1 i. Ilwd�r DI'J MN i EXHIM :rk F n 1 1 i t I } CITY Or. Tl CI.E ,.. '•,c . PL i \G DIVf.SIi)N o , � n 1 1 i t I } CITY Or. Tl CI.E ,.. '•,c . PL i \G DIVf.SIi)N �e h� f all iN i d, r CITY OF, RAN + D C CATM , 7T "Will, crry or- �7 Vr RANCHO CT;pdMCTNGA PEAMF ING MqSK)N SCA LE, all r I i 1 CITY Of. ]RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING Drvis aN ,.. -- SGtCE � - 1 -02 c2 -25 -87 PC Agenda �' 2 s f i f i CITY OF PLANNING D[VtS"FCA" 1 _, cJ EzCHit3TT :..-. 9.... SCAU, .. v RESOLUTION NO. l A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO` CUCAaM_ONGA PLANNING, COMISSION. APPROYihl6 DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 12577 "LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 19TH STREETf WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE IN THE LOW'�)ENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT } WHEREAS, or the 2nd day of October, 1986, a complete application was filed by Nordic 6Mf� pment for ravieW of the ak�ve -; escribed project; and WHEREAS, ,;on the 25th day of Fsbruary,", ,ILQ4 , fie Rancho Cucamonga Planning Conmisz1on hald a meeting to consider. tip=-;.;, ;r described prodgct, Mai, THEREFQRE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved t3 follows: r SECTION 1: That the following crn be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed., use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is. located; and That`4he proposed use is in complianye with each of the applicable provisions.,of the Development Code; and k That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public, health, safety, or welfare, or materially injuri(_Vs to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTAN. 22: That Design Review for Tract 12577 is approved subject to the fdVown�g conditions and attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: 1. _In additional window shall be provided on the front elevation of plan 1670E at the right side of the garage. 2. A minimum five (5) foot usable side yard area shall, be provided between the residences and the top or toe of slopes or base of the retaining wAlls, PL AN t(ING 'L�iiFlM 0 t("ESOLUTION NO. 12577 D't - NORt�'C FTRTR rlZary 2S= 1587; z' Page 2 3. Corner, side yard walls (decorative' blod,k) and I As ping on Lots 1 and 15 shall be pi-a4ided by tfia am cant. ht. Plans shall be submitted for review -, and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. = r 4. All pertinent conditions for Tentative'Tract 19577, contained in Resolution No. 84-11 shall apply. 5. good ieim or plant -nns with stucco, over shall. be =. provided around all windows, > Engineering Division 1. An in-lieu flee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing ,overhead 'utilitioas (telecoAmunications and electric) on the, opposite side of 19th Street shall be paid to bhe City prior to final inspection or uccupanoy permits, whichever occurs last. The fee shall be one -half the adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage (330t feet), APPROVED APES ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CltY'� 'q 'C UNI.Ho CUCAMONGA ; \. BY: avid Bar er, • a man ATTESTS ra u er eppty a rre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cortmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bq the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeti(4 of the Planning Compission held on the 25th day of February, 1987, by the following Note -to ='wit; AYES: COWISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: I ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i l y 110-a j �' M R: t b All � p �t ua.�u. s '% s P!j ;may -� a �i}•�p,n s��;rr. rar g.i�gt�y FTC wR� jai .4.'fc A, 'j IR-11 Says a Ka RE, 01-L llp Ilk Z a Ilk !;j¢N• OV�G�� y�W s rHa� >,$: M Sp�, .�.4�N yy. UvuS A WEA #3` 9l .vws 16`d` u »w+ u a G �. $' V4M yy A cU i M V Iy9P ■ �N w M p 0 Y 4N ►'"iJdi A o- s O ~icy.y � � W.��:�ti X11 \,,� VZ Cr. 't �` NALll p �. $' V4M yy A cU i M V Iy9P ■ �N w M p 0 Y 4N ►'"iJdi A o- � •1 2 u D 1 a Y ^3_4 fi � la bC a C VC i 4_55 e ASH s1$ gil 3,g W;tn J-1 fl, AL Zj y yQ• g� 1 ��wA �® Igia2 -52 =sH+ w Ec+ M LD y 23, ai s 53 r 9A5c -H >, jC[� d r � Jij YVI p6 ^L& •Y�O ya � S� M'}� —fuz L• ML� i • �O 3 -5—,3i Y ON • �p0 `�jy six U,YZ � `y it �.y. �'`D`=71 ■YY��$' �_..°°fi$u 4�. a Ng$pw.. L �� C O bC1`> C {tls� 'j Y cV �C7^ VNyO r0 Op w 4X9Q� 01 eC.NN Nq » �: >Ya 40�f. • yV�Ra�a[ _ MC N.Iw 6 ap�. O pu.�•AA. C�r o Oy nLo e N> C Y amo■YY e . V° $ d ' w°uc °�w agy i> l HVy ys � a S s ■VYO M�.^4 $ p�p 3n.uV.°� �Y ' o N . ."y : ` V{�` 't"":e��{.y N�C nen iQ yy ■a u^`s M '' . g a°�i+p�Y�y'? � ` 0 N S �; �V .0 N i b M�yi Cvs r iy 4 �u t g 4 tOI Crash 2 r-1u-zzi 3 j �7oCn ..wA 1�i NO: K ^M° N4 zz 2�06Yf -mss I 1 0 L m diQ,'°i fi CO.� Co 0�09.Oi..C.wti +3 BUG G LOS. te. Ferri$ ��i Yup °Yca8py'}y Z..Ya_ r CSyp3 Lo I, Yp• y�. �i^ tlykgp JsZ .e J1 • �.Ti AarN �41@/ iL ti y!♦ •i.=Y Y�4'. gIO pY ¢N ffyryp]] =Yp pa��,A Ya Yey�yL� �g"g ci a'l�o+; NaYr dN Y•$ ��Ltl} $�a'y'�b��Z� w�q�0.�' C� ��y.r gwwyy1 'K0 NAs$sTy.�'y 'i:q &yg�a•« y ood 7i "L4 KJ~¢i RY. �'?4 g »bA -1 G1{�S.I0 ry ` Yp®qtlsC S/i Spy $P Is _L Md 'Y CiN MME+ 'Sy" Y CY Vlf dinT'. 4-2 p: 1:rw.3� ogo mp✓ d71L A»A�.* dy y Jh ^ i F. 7L i i 2N i S � yy O Kp� K� 3-.It Kw u—N. 9 a GC _Y2 Lr N q1 Y a y d< q �� • LAL� wptl GGGG L + A M� �Y e�. Yids. u•a it ra pY� vN' a V . G 4 cr's saw -«"�.5 Y.$ CBS e1'' 0 t RoRsZ lk WE +w4. "f `�.. y ICIyLz�e b� 9Ca Yy* +Y+ Y qL� ~M4r�d OQQ~yy t�i.`k6C. _MN L !Q cC A p _ O L @ t f Y bf Yv LN Z- ` Q Se ga ppO a o Np QY r�T ~_ A Lti g y� qo O 5--g. O9C SO • Q O` }fir sQ —.3t ,? iFisir V V .YiO Y =YM 'C CC �Mp YCL q9 L N 0 W A Q t Y? 6 qC J YYaY M dyCr 9 +Y Op �Y VLY.M M ■+■ +a C •.Y��YYVy i KOMo'.a�.acr. p t Y..zwnb F. 6N <{; 4d 1••.O U_Y �OIY C. aCNd4 W0.6�N.0 1r � ( I � y e _gL Y M {/ "'`y�y �g v 3= �_ r aj.i rtaM uv� .p � 1pi•'�R �i q+ ay 2�� i :63y 21$31% jb! S a at w Y� ; va Ali 3- 3 MI AL az r r � M gll X,g�w s� ^ ^� 3E Y x. N`: 11 : p3 r1'S AL'S +� na. S -r z., s -:� b L w ` s = fat! - �y P 2 � � o� YY '.y .•� ip '3 S S k. 20 S S _SEg` e elf °4 y�? v �y MMw ^V 33s Y�4AM 'Y CG � Y � Y= GAY �P, S� MS�. Y —4b `� C ogg.> Vf V �O� ` a!000� �C p� iA �l� MYCpY 61, a �w.82 v 7s� w N f1 A m ,.t W ^ M � �� Y 1� -'> ga ga �- ZZI MV^ ill-in I N`: 11 : p3 r1'S AL'S +� na. S -r z., s -:� b L w ` s = fat! - �y P 2 � � o� YY '.y .•� ip '3 S S k. 20 S S _SEg` e elf °4 y�? v �y MMw ^V 33s Y�4AM 'Y CG � Y � Y= GAY �P, S� MS�. Y —4b `� C ogg.> Vf V �O� ` a!000� �C p� iA �l� MYCpY 61, a �w.82 v 7s� w N f1 A m 0 � V t I •a a • Mal MI -- $ o q . yg ssr s =MMNesr ex :Oilx His Q " Wy ` Y K a N ~ ° if 9g New �� g�� y. � VA �r r rani': A _ A 1' i L r'} O' `" e' Vii'• IL iv wOC N� �N °yO • rYYq« �1 V1U9H� ��9m WN. WY 6 iL0A6f! ! !� lBI K S 0 i YlG V 4 d.1 +QI .Q 4 Ilia$ « 8 jn " "a SU air Ir biY ewe• . leat. ¢i = '� ^ w�•r d Y * V�iu f j I Y of , j I o a 4 Y ffi_ Y4Y� ' 4 'Std'.: a* wr $3 dri , 3{ ae jj12 i �� s lit * P all 29 s ! 12 ��.115¢¢¢`` � N 1j i a's i vir wyY � w *La 14 r 1 ��r YAll, Tp aqe e t "'•sa�� b gam. ' 9 y, a j :Sw ut R i• MAW O M b J�� a Y ffi_ Y4Y� ' 4 a* Y A $3 dri YAll, Tp aqe e t "'•sa�� b gam. ' 9 y, a j :Sw ut R i• MAW O M b J�� ti r, a L a i� 6 vs- big 150 aS d . All fit- .. IL ^ ji ST J, C19m s q ^.� ��`fi � .i �, s �y • � ,�i y �� •\ !j y y . �L 12 .42 N C I N L ~I � "! • N r � �A M i vs- big 150 aS d . All fit- .. IL ^ ji ST J, C19m s q ^.� ��`fi � .i �, s �y • � ,�i y �� •\ !j y y . �L 12 .42 N C I N L ~I � "! • N r � 1-1 El DATES TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OFT(ANCHO CUCAl , NGA S d " RE PeC?R1 n, +� GA, i a r O O 2 C February 25, , 1987 1977 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Bulj_7r, City Planner Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner TENTATIVE TRACT 13318 DESIGN REVIEW - MAYFLOWER HOMES - Design Review of building elevations and plot plans for a previously approved tract map consisting of 16 single family lots on 5 acres of land in the Low Density Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Hermoss Avenue and Manaanita Drive - APN 201- 181.28. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of building elevations and plot p lans. B. Project Density: 3.4 dwelling units per net acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoni Nort Single family res en Sal .(proposed), Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South - Vacant, Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Single family residential (under construction), Low Density Residential (2-4 du /ac) West -} Single family residential, Ver Low Density Residential (less than 2 du /ac D. General Plan Designations: ro ect s -ite - Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) North - Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South Low Density Residential 2 -4 du /ac) East Low Density Residential 2 -4 du /ac) West Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du /ac) E. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant with a 64% slope from north to south. II. ANALYSIS: A. Background- Tentative Tract 13318 was originally approved by the Planning Commission on November 12, 1986, as a custom lot subdivision. The tract map has not been recorded 4s,af the date of this report. 1 ITEM C PLANNING ows, N � TT 13318 DR February 25,, 19$7 ;> Page 2 8. �dfgral, The applicant is proposing to develop all 16 lots at t s"fl"ma. The applicant �as submitted two floor plans with three elevations per fl "r plan, C. Design Review Coamittea. On February 5, 1987, the besiga Review ."Coaitte --�` aviaMarker, Bruce Emerick, and Dan Coleman R reviewed the project and recoraaaended approval subject to Ora fal owtog con4ftioits, 1. The driveway, on'lbt 9 should be relocated to the north side of the, lob tq_ provide safer in grwss and 2. The area and the, terminus ' of tfie - debsaics should be irrigated vW JAndscap d by the applicant. ,t 3. Corner side �-ird fencing~ tdecorative block) and landscaping sh6id be pravided by the applicant. 4. A minimum 5 fao t usable side yard area should be provic��d. Staff would also recora+aend that the chary yellow exterior color fdr Floor Pura 8 . elevation 1 be toned down. 1 M. REC NDATIQM*. Staff recormods that the Flan ing Co lssiuW � approve a uilding elevations and plat plans tt.� gh adoption of, the attached Resolution with conditions. Reqrftfull y submitted, $ra R er City P annex 89: SM: sgr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit 08" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" W Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations Resolution with Conditions r i OF � RANCHO CUCA O � GA Tnu, ,�,�� -rte, PLANNING D[VISIQN EXHITUT. sOUE, C- W1 t i 0 , CITY Of. �Y PLAMING �.. r - f I ' a� r r r , r + .r ta tj rk ' r t fl=it' j r f a, e Si a� I I cilly Of. a.li'11SC"1 +raLE, I crr y car Aft ri. `.fiitc \Ci 1 ?IF+P:S`i EXHIBITt b o SCAfiF. M CIT IV, P%1�PiiiioaG UTViSECI i+Yfi31"t`t —_. SCALE= I C-9 ! f 3 EEclit EF R} tit gi 1RIi! j crry OF RANCHO CUCmMQLN T MEa :PLANNING QTV"ESE � E It E� ;r i 0 MIN of, NAMING DnrLSnN 'F-YHIMT: � I� `z. 0 MIN of, NAMING DnrLSnN 'F-YHIMT: � RESOLUTI ))N NO. A RESOLUTION OF THEI�ANCHq�44CAMONGA PLANNING CGMMISSION APPPqNG DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 13313 LOCATED AT THE Sbb- 345AST CORNEki OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND MAKANITA DRIVE IN THE�,bW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Ff. # WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of January, 1987, a complete application was filed by Mayflower homes for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of February, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. NOW TF.EREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows; SECTION 1. That the following can be met. 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives`of the General plan; and 2. That the proposed use. is in accord with the objective of the Developtent Zode and the :;.jrposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed u e is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions If the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2 That Design Review for Tract .13318 is approved subject to the Poll' wing con itions and attached Standard Conditions: - 1. The driveway on Lot 9 shall be relocated to the north side of the lot to provide safer ingress and egress. 2. The area at the terminus of the cul -de -sacs shall be irrigated and landscaped by the applicant. Plans shall bL su-mitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. Corner side yard fencing (decorative block) and landscaping shall be provided by the applicant. Plans shall be submitted for review and approval by k the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. PLAiiNlNG °1 1 RG50Lill ION NO' TT 1HtyMES February 25, 197 Page 2 il K. 4.'* A minimum five (5) foot usable side yard area shalt be provided between the residences and the toe of the Mopes.s or base of the retaining walls. S. A revised color mat -er Jals sample shall be submitted ° which ,indicates a more subtle exterior color 'f-,r 'Floorr,Pf'6 'B elevation 1. G. All pertinent conditions of Tentative Traci: 13318 i contained in Resolution 85 -ti9 shall apply. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25Th .C;�'4 OF FEBRUARY, 1987. A PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF PANCHO "SCWNGA I " f laDav 'deicer, Chairman r ATTEST Brad Buller, DepuFy SiEretary % J ` 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comuissi" n of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the -foregoing Resolution was duty and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted 3y"the Planning Cowis ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of February, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: !, e AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: t _ a 'Q E —a�� a.'. y� beds Via'` .aeo�i'i a xg.rj I... 106 oa o »GLIB A . ¢QV �"g9•.. �O uses sY oQ i{4 � {O�'R� wC.vN B ati fit* Cdh� l epµ1s w�o�ii�Se1�yYlq ,`yy�Y� �wKr •Y 6aCar. a-al y iR Va au vi-A! 11111v Z34 10-1.111 N F L gs$gy► U$ iff JJ fioukZ .21 ! :i:i t : 41 ra �•dSa� Sibs $.L�ra ..�� 11 rl g ' ° vat.,'.�e°$'vI »,,, �' � 1 wrt. 1:. � � wc' e � r3 �4Ot �:O• pN� M gM Y �LM7O Ishii y0 , SCS_ Eli is Z �y }yO -a 2 r •pq y�� IMy�p'iN »a I �#�'`^ ` OV O V NNi q �+ � yYaaa`i�a I B ! �6.N s" � 6 V I Iby�� ` Qa pp Y L d QI► y� O t x �C 1 �l L v O VS Is S11V no iM ri b A b E gx 6 +� 4 y M Aiw CC T A ffim iL` V�qAP VS�Y M ,�Ny aM p. t 02 ��Myyyw pa as EDAB r �iD� � �.y1 6�Y a Pal � • g - As Y S$ y tt C 1 1% tls 'r �1 {� M c�i3$Hv < wi{ a u Yq W � L iM b E 6 +� Sk N �S VCp�,a�N�ffi�JJ� N v+ �A.H 41H as wi{ a u Y r 61l p VC =y� =■ui `r1 nu 3.5 C! V r Y WzA A.KO i. d� N Yy Y M!D M gang :=� �srie �Y fig ^ w y a »6- S �ggeY ga'= S$_g �o �;;+ =_ �� ilg �i0.. �fi `;t. +w •� - 8 � Ell� Yugo _ #xa � `�"g 34SUpll nw $ o�ia6 g M�' =$u aibay a 9 G y uv�qy¢�s�+pYp !Nn ~. M C GL`4A Er °Y YQ Oa Y GYY'QOO Yyo .�a� �p�u Y�� LY9 • +� NCS O yC ^^'y4 �Lweee��Cp aa. tQ Dp�,,'o ■yyaY `w �C 01 Z4 N Y Y d> ` O v G C 4 C 0 O Y A n G i1 g d q ,Cj 7 6 ti ¢ 4 C V~ tE L:l��1C$ �Yg�Nyy E,�q„gE C•6 ` G 4 O'�Y Ya `tl s pWa3D L 6 YG �d °OOO ._4 Y dgSq 47PL0 �`M6 I�C M.Q 6r N.p \Tw �QV .°r G4 .4.� FN KC4 lis <; tV } b E Y 'Ji Q M w w w S$ y tt C 1 1% 'r �1 {� M �IL W ej P(i < Y r 61l p VC =y� =■ui `r1 nu 3.5 C! V r Y WzA A.KO i. d� N Yy Y M!D M gang :=� �srie �Y fig ^ w y a »6- S �ggeY ga'= S$_g �o �;;+ =_ �� ilg �i0.. �fi `;t. +w •� - 8 � Ell� Yugo _ #xa � `�"g 34SUpll nw $ o�ia6 g M�' =$u aibay a 9 G y uv�qy¢�s�+pYp !Nn ~. M C GL`4A Er °Y YQ Oa Y GYY'QOO Yyo .�a� �p�u Y�� LY9 • +� NCS O yC ^^'y4 �Lweee��Cp aa. tQ Dp�,,'o ■yyaY `w �C 01 Z4 N Y Y d> ` O v G C 4 C 0 O Y A n G i1 g d q ,Cj 7 6 ti ¢ 4 C V~ tE L:l��1C$ �Yg�Nyy E,�q„gE C•6 ` G 4 O'�Y Ya `tl s pWa3D L 6 YG �d °OOO ._4 Y dgSq 47PL0 �`M6 I�C M.Q 6r N.p \Tw �QV .°r G4 .4.� FN KC4 lis <; tV } E a•+ V d .0 L Q 4f V2 V G Y�Y Y iO K n3 K .{4N. �. aS.. • �� OYyZY�N Y 3 P 1.. C�1�Y C+ .. Y Y3 ••.�•N✓ wi aW`y Y=i .Y•i��'... M Y Iz bA =L �yY P43 TcC�S VP• pp_ S Z �. L x «✓ 4j L.. tY1w. Ja `e°..$ `� M.Y.,, �•° $Yid P��' V"`G. , YL66� a C� 1 a • 4 O111ttt000YYY � P'r4p // bk) ^ U. .x v.c$ Y Y6YC` N go S-3 6N 9, VT�i 1=N.i bj µ_cpp�e CN4 4f V2 V G Y�Y Y i°Y �� OYyZY�N ✓i.$� VCY. a �{4y�4il M O�py C�1�Y C+ NC Y3 ••.�•N✓ wi aW`y Y=i g M P43 Y� •{T- pp_ S Z �. L x «✓ 4j L.. tY1w. Ja 1 w _o •^ P7 1 �� J; IF pa Y3 •C`a aW`y Y=i Y�• .2.4 Y� •{T- pp_ i��{�. Ja ^yL. 4ySW= >�O °�y �!A�g' L.Y��Y y�t`r Oi YL66� IS k. gyp• Gy Y GMY$ v.c$ ;jai` a - a 2- - -jspy, v3. q wL PaO pal :iZ a. 43 +— sr is.�O a•� LY �. C Y ON.. so, CcYYa � � ®CC+� 1.2 cd g N � `o tOS �I +w Mt ° Y sio.Yi�3�i +M �'L p.O q� YC •V pr. • Y� °4L� � °�w NA v Yi •• q y Y� S 1. c x s g p° 'G N C d. �d � �. y� p Y g C �.Y�� C— � «�� ^- cP `.Y'. �'p• `� N�f)" V`.PD {V, Y�w 9 —.G3a C Y:��. ►a Z.0 y� ° ONCE ^y— Lip GN J =fi Y�Wy Lp NNy >y�y •• •` §•p °S4 NSG at�LL4 •C ••NP r.t L4��.. Y i K9fM YO4 l�p,q �ti L �° L OtYI HO —Y C� CO i. f,p0 WO VYNM� � C P7 1 ~�7 "iN 2 CrYO a at Y C 3 C d Y 1- .y4yN piY Y r, ia.Y. SYt. w�» y r. 141 Yw e5 S_ jag cu u.'es'i -A.wj. f N AM all a. O S U�1�N'.. Y asY, A $�. vi Iz L' o. »A t x _. y 1.2 s3« yR rt it _ _ YY�i i Vq N &Z.3 N $p uE A. '4x L � yyypypypyp E 2: ` pppp� S B g N yg EVS. `'ail E�Y .C.tv " 4N ��0 a = �x�• P N rNg rl ^.2 w ` 'c 5��. o �a rte. �y E.} i, $Z:o Ea w N ' Y $w� .- i n acv a u i uA Y S� a-`• 5$�� U ��: S_vg �'' c N. 11-2 1 ��rCC ^L C 6. C 14y�YY 6 LOF w� 3 +• ti pNt �sO TCMY a4i V1p�CCO�A� p =C ��2 v +A 91350 L f. _._Y.Y CV v im.. X.— L40� YM NY. ..�Lt iwoJ L ►:C >� <L3 OLr� V tll iw W.YS �Y Y Cl - ,/6 11 r� V d 0 a Ives a till � »�� r s IS kg a �3 3 M tg N$ - os CC os we Q O1« O C C^Q�t w L p t N N Ff ( ( I J IN 7 V PST I x1E:3a 1 �91 NJ Y 11�M� i ° L V s?IL .2 RZIN v U YS �t a° L � � lie 1^ CC iwl.Y� DIRP {�4 w�71s y F a ^w^ lilk 91Y Y e ye�. 4 ° � Za A. ;3 grog 1- Sip �9�0 �6�6YL tf3 d7 N'� tw 6 �° p ^Qp�e lO, o Y. tl4 �N ti VtYON� ii J IN 7 V PST I x1E:3a 1 �91 NJ Y 11�M� i ° L V s?IL .2 RZIN v U YS �t a° L � � lie 1^ CC iwl.Y� DIRP {�4 OOG� 4� ��• �;_\ +� O�'II�� y r � ' y 4Na� Sys mix N �' L 1 Y� +NN N.. O i y � i r ., �r 7 T a $E y :4r'L �! s M , !r{n'�' i g \�,+�`s a e °�t3 C X22 S jw 4aY��++ yi xg HUS ex SUMS ass; Y a x` y iaya w' �'S'.i`snts 3Z to F A4W ei s i e r ~w ��iyup► grL� » 1•y Hu h F 7.- 2i+ JI AML i� fj a A s � i A_- Nil Na'p�� Elk$ LS sNS r L1 • i g at s a »a s ` R H y 5 r M r YSS iP 4 WR a Y + *Y k PfI( N S s i e r ~w ��iyup► grL� » 1•y Hu h F 7.- 2i+ JI AML i� i A_- Nil L1 • R r� N s i e r ~w ��iyup► grL� » 1•y Hu h F 7.- 2i+ JI AML i� r'1 11 IRN 0 U 4J O i n zu ThE a $ x e DZ8 ex imi-I Zs glal ZI g-Lr�riy g c�w" ■.o co'�35'.. I r` e. x j 3" y* r PtAMI:NO cow Mnloi ksoam- -o- _ OTC' 13318 OR - M FI.Oii� !i February Z5, 1,987 Page 2 4<- A minio m five (5) foot usable side bard area shall be prdvIded between the residences `and the toe of , the slopas or base of the retaining walls. 5. A revised color matereais sample shall Wisubmitted l whicts 'indicates a +¢ore suvle exterior color for Floor Plan 8 eieAtign 1. APPROVED AND ADCPTM THIS 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 19$7. PLANNING COMISSION 'OF THE Ct,'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: € Davia Mir- er,. a"arman ATTEST: Brad Buller, oej y Secretary f I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning' CoMission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do( ereby tertifv, that the Foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced }}, passed, mnd adop', -+d by the Planning Comission of the City of Rance Cucamonga, at a regular �eking of the pla0ling C(x=ission held on the 25th day of February, 1987, by the following voteotu -wit: k`. AYES:. COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMONERS: ABSENT: COMISSIONERSx i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST"F REPORT � t w p i U DATE: Febr€!ary 25,A987 W7 TO- Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller,`City Planner BY: Nancy Fong,: Associate Planner SUBJECT: ERVIROti_I T& ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -15 '�a" - e es s ta+en of a motor o us asse7 ' y us ness within an existing 168,000 sgomk'e foist f0ustrial building, ;W the 83,000 square faav expansioc of the existing build?Rg on 11.8 acres of land (n 'tack" (General Industrial /Raif Served District (Subai ea 2), located at the: - southeast corner;',f Arrow Highway and Vineyard Avenue APR 209- 012 -15 continued from December 10, 1986). DEVELOPMENT REVIEti 86 -13 - MODIFICATION - MESSENGER - The request y the-previously approved Master Plan by reducing the site area of Phase III from 4.4 acres to 2.9 acres in the, - general Industrial /Rail S&-ved District (Subarea 2), likated at the northeast corner of 5th Street and Vineyard Avenue - APR ,)9- 012 -16. (Continued from Aece0er 10, 1 86.) I. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, on December 10, 1986, continued is item to thij regular meeting, at the request of 0-be applicant. As stated in `the attached letter, the applicant is requesting for withdrawal from this Conditional Use Permit, and the related modification to Development Review 86 -13.. II. RECOMMENDATION: No action is needed from the Planning Commission. Res tfully itte f Brad Bul per City Planner BB :NF:ns Attachments: Letter from Ipplicant ITEM 'D f E ACL PxA; 4P February 4, 1:957 4 °�'' o1i "0 a;� Ft� rf j Mad Ms. Nancy Tong Ij9lt0l�1Py�� Plannir4 aepax-t*ont City of Rancho Cuce�a�; . _ I�FV6 9320 C Baseline Rd. '.Rancho Cucamonga, California 51730 RE Conditional us' a- Crown Coa(*, Tnternatiar t Dear Nancy: - - -x^.'- I want to take at moment to thank you on behalf of Messenger Investment Company for all your efforts as well as the time, pxtietece and ccoPeration you have shown us it -our attempt -to obtain a Conditional Uge Permit for Gown Coach. International. Crown, Coach Intarnational was recently involved in a corporate 91.1-,1,e and, while it is our understanding that thm escrow did not close, the resulting rep- organization Of thO company and its key personnel has forced us to request that this file be suspended until Crown Coach has completed its "transition" period. Nancy, I believe 3t 'is our joint go!ki to .ultimately Place a company ^ h 69al -Arrow R,, te."�i fts t4nancy will benefit Rancho Cucamonga -`and whose- 41prida of ownership'► attitude will bn a p,sitive reflection 'upon Messenger- Investment Company. )cUease call me should you have any questions. Sinc ly, Dana S. Sanders Vice president Southern California Commercial Development DSS /cl cc: Brad Bu''� -M City plLnner David BarxeL, Commissioner Suzanne Chit #ea, Commissioner Larry McNiel, Commissioner Peter Tolstoy, Commissioner Bill Messenger, Jr. 16912 -A for Karman Avenue, Irvine, CA 92774 7)4f474 -1300 v I] DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT. vLi Z rgCAMq STAFF REFORM 0 V FebruarT 25, 1987 19777 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT_ AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85 -03D - %.L1 i ur mul6mu LAUPRMA - A request to amend the lance se Elemeft7 a e eneral Plan i•rom Lori- Medium Density Residential (4 -B dwelling units /acre) to LOW Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units /acre) and /or Very Lora Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) for 68 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Wilson (if extendad) and Milliken (if extended) - APN: 201 -191 11, 17. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A& DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 7MMT 86705---CITY . request amen the eve:opme►: s r c p ran "FG" (Flood Control) and "LM" (Low - Medium Density Residential - 4 -8 dwelling units /act °e) to "L" (Low Density Residential - 2 -4 dwelling units /acre) and /or "VL" (Very Love Density Residential - less than 2 dwelling units /acre) for 6P acres of land located at the southwest corner of Filson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APN: 201 -19- 11, 17. 1. BACKGROUND: At the Planning Commi3sion meeting of January 14,- 19877—Fe—Commission continued this General Plan Amendment to February 25, 1987 for tNe Deer Creek Company to submit a subdivision map. The subdivision map would address the Commission's concerns of grading, circulation, density and land use transition issues on the subject site. II. REVIEW• The subdivision map (TT13542) was submitteC to staff for 'R view. The map has proceeded through Design Review and is scheduled to be heard by the Planning Commission �5n March 25, 1537. The mnp, however, is inconsistent with tae Circulation Element of the General Plan. Staff is currently in the process of revising the Circulation Elemeri: of the General Plan. One of the items to be revised is the alignment of Wilson and Milliken from its currently curved ITEM E tP .$G Q3Q`�.C� au�ia j `t' ' 1'GFl4 c4cr , Cq fe0ruary 25, 1987 Pago 2 L ....,<: r -, connection to a conventional 900 intersection, Wilson is the 1' northern boundary of the subject "site. The circulation element is V scheduled tr, be heard by th° (Planning Commission on March 25, 1987. { this revision Vill affect the submitted yap and, fheref{� .;1. �ieterminati rn of this General Plan, and Development Y° District Amendwent, staff requests these amendnents be continued to March 25, 1987 when all related items may be heard. III RECW' NQATION: Staff requests that the Planning Commis a con, nuance sion grant Of the General Fian and Qevlat Amendment to;:MArch 25, 1987. Development District ,. rtes utlY su T ra Sull.; r City Planp'r 88•CKsvc a Attachments: Staff Report of September 24, 1987 Staff Report of January 143 1987 ;xura� �I i j' i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG�. zvc�t ST.AFIV REPORT op z w O (�u '. DATE: January 14,, 1587 19777 TO: Chairman and Members of 1Lif, /Planning Conmi�lsion. FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT:: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -03D ° request o amen a an se amen a e enerai -Plan from Lava- Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling unit, /acre) to Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units /acre) and /or Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units /afire) for 68 acres of land "located at the southwest corner of Wilson (if extended) and•;Milliken (if extended) - APN: 201 -191 11, 17. ENVIRONMIF' :L ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT l�(T( moo- - - reques amen t :e eve opmen s r c,. p ronr "FC "" {Flood Control) and "LM" {Low- Medium D,ensi� Residential - 4 -8 duelling unit' /acre) to "L" (Low Eaensity Residential -c " -4 dwelling unT��lacre) and /or "YL" (Very Low Density kesidential` - Tess than 2 dwelling units /acre) for;; 68 acres of land located at the southwest corner of 4ilson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APR: 201 -191- 11, 17. I. BACKGROUND: At the Planning Commission meeting of September 24, a request to change the General Plan Land Use Map from Low - Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units/a.-re) to Low Density Residential (24 dwelling units /acre) in conjunction with a Development Districts Amendment was reviewed. This request was initiated by City Council. (Please see the attached September 24, 1986 staff report for more details,) At the Commission meeting, concern was raised as to whether Low Density Residential was an appropriate transitional designation from surrounding land uses (Exhibit "A "). The property owner also asked that 'he be given the opportunity to prepare :conceptual plans for the subject site, and present the plan to the Planning CormV)sion prior to decisions on the property being made. e PLANNING COMMISS109 `4FF REPORT GPA 86 -030 & DDA 86• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 14, 1981 Page 2 '7 if The tkmission continued this General Plan Amendment and Develoi{Iaent Distkct Amendment 4i order for the landowner to provide a conceptual plan cons�5tent with the Low Density desiq'iation. Staff was requested to provide options at both the Low and Very Low designations. II. OPTIONS AVAILABLE: There are two options available to the Commission: (A) That the Law - Medium designation to be changed to Law Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units /acre). This is consistent with the property owners preference. (8) That the subject site to be changed to Very toed Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) per the Commission's previous discussions. Alternative A: The property owner would prefer that the subjept s't�cFianged Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units /acre). This designation would permit single fam {I1y residences on lots of 8,000 square feet average minimum. -Tsis designation would pro0de an adequate transition of densities to south of Banyan`s average of 6,000 square foot lots -, However, the north, portion of the site abutts Deer Creek with its 1 acre ?ots and the transition would be more abrupt. On December 3, 1986, a representative of the property - owner submitted a tentative tract map application to divide the property Into 203 single family lots at a density of 3.05 dwelling units per acre (Exhibit °B "). Parcels proposed for the site range in size from 8,562 square feet to 18,940 square feet with as average lot size of 10,944 square feet in area. The lots are generally located on cul -de -sac streets coming off of the major north,.south . circulation spine conning Wilson Avenue pnd Banyani Street which created %q€ sub- neighborhoods within the project. While no unit product type has been submitted a, part of thi application, discissions with the the applicant indicate that residences constructed on stem wails with raised wood floors are being considered. As a result, the only grading that will be necessary will be for construction of the streets and associated improvements. It is important to note that no action is being requested on the tentative tract map application at this time. The tract map is provided purely as an informational aid to conceptually depict how the site cout a developed at the Low Density Residential PLANNING COMMISSION 'TAFF REPOR GPA 86-R30-4 DOA 86• - CITY OF RANCHO cucmomA Januarl%i14, 1987 Page 3 standards. If the Planning Commissf'�-.A does deteriine- ~that Low Density Residential is the appropriate General Plan an#,,Development ti District Designation, the tentative tract imp will conti ue through the committee process so technical and design issues can be resolved prior to format action by the Planning Commission. Alternative B: > The Commission has requested the alternative of ery LOW Density Residential on the subject site. This designation- requires 22,500 square foot lots and is normally associated with an extensive trail system and an environment conducive to equestrial use. If designated Very Low, approximately 130 dwellings would be permitted on the site by the General Flan, though if developed under the City's Basic Standards as a conventional subdivision, a mere realistic potenlal would be around 100 units. The exact number would of course, ?depend on the specifics of design. The Very Low designation would provide an appropriate transition in density on the north, adjacent to the Deer Creek project.' However the transition to the area south of Banyan designated Low- Medium would represent a two -step chanya (ilery Lori to Low - Medium), and itould as a result be less appropriate. III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMiENT The Initial Study has been completed for b6th the Low an < ery 1 -ow designations by staff an no significant adverse environmental impacts were identified to be associated with either alternative. IV. FACTS FCR FINDING: Should the Commission, upon examination of the subject nera an Amendment and Development District Amendment, decide that the change would promote the;; land use goats and policies of the General Flan, would not be imterially detrimental to the adjacent properties or would not c-4use significant adverse environmental impacts, the following are the findings that are necessary upon approval': " A. The Amendments do not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan; and B. The Amendments do promote goals of t,`)e Land Use Element; and C. The Amendments would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties; and D. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in surrounding areas. i pCAt{'r. fttCi C4XSSICFt `"rAFF REPORT !l6rO�U BQR'86� « - CI7`t OE REtiA:iii1 CUCAJNGA 4/ II 9 OP January 14, 1987 Page 4 3` item ha> been advertised as ;! angel t YI. CORRESPONDENCE: This wa posted, �%e 'j- a o: t newspaper. The prop rtat 3GO' feet of the not�aes were serf o atI property owners within proect site, III. REGOMNE AXON: Staff iS requesting direction as to the `-w0st es�gnation fo propperty- %££solutions are attached a ropr_a e. if the for bot and Very �.ow 0ty Re %{%goal desi Snati ong. these �ti M, &ppraval of the c: C is selects of One of oP rap to Resolution of Appro" C is necessary. Respec 1 submitted, Brad ar City P anner i 88: :VC Utacihnents: Exhibit °A" - Land Use Exhibit or - Conceptual Trap% Piar. ,_ J' Minutes of September 24, 1986 planning Commission Meeting Staff Report 4 September 24, 1986 Resolutions of Approval i I 1 r I ,I W 1,�MLAAP LAA L] LM M1 V L �� a Q �rc PC -i- LM T M -;M ,- =vv..9 vvt-r tsknw- Fc C:e -604,v jow ® ® # # 0 Am= 'rill J11 NORTH CITY OF vnno �� •� ITEM:-4 d3t� RANCHO C CAMON A TITLE: W. PLANNING I MSION EXHIBIT: A SCAJE: ( 2 � ' §§§ | | �| � h \$ � . .. ! .�kkk 2Icf 2 ;nom it \\ x �! i ! , � Ok , � ■ .�■ � &! :�^ �! i ! , � Ok , � ENVIRONMM! AC ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENCMEHT 86 -04 - CITY ' reoues,. o amen a Development s ric map -rte___ , = i ttac) to "OP-- (D,rfice /Professionai(t -for .75 acres. aiicr'� E located on the south side 1 of Foothill Boulevard, 25 feet west of Hellman f Avenue (9113 Foothill Boulevard) - APN 208 - 241 -09. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff re rt�,�`, o Chairman Stout opened the P folic hetari.ng. Ryan Sellers, 13106 McKinley Avenue, Chino, urgOq approval of the request. Steve Lucas, 9489 Apricot, Rancho 0�eamonga, sulrrted the request on behalf of the adjacent property owner. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. r: Motion; Moved by Stout, seconded by Tol stay. to recommend approval of Envirormtental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 86 -03 C to the City Council. Motion carried by the following vote: d AYES: COMMISSIONERS STOUT. TOLSTOY, BARKER, CHITIEA, MCNIEL G' NOES: CQ`c� SSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: 'COFMISSIONERS: NONE - carried' i Motion; i4oved *----'Stout, seconded by Barker, to recommend approval of Environmertal Assessment and Development Dittrict Amendment 86-04 to the City I CoaAcil. ''Motion carried by the folloring vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS STOUT, BARKER, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: 'tOMMIISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried L.aea 61900IMM MW RJK APNIMM W4M - CITY OF request to amend We Land _U-se-E ement of the GeneHaT n res diem Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) to Low Density Residential (2 - -4 duiac) for 68 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Wilson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APN 201- 191-.: 1, 17. Planning Cocmnissida Minutes -19- September 24, 1986 ;; 0--- --- - -- - +s' s rnt wk, V-4 %,&I I re reques o amen eve opine nt s r c a r Mood Control ) and -LM- (Low Medium Density Residential - 4 -8 du/ to "L" (Low Density Residential - 2 -4 du/ac ) for 58 acres of land 'locatei at the southwest corner of Wilson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APR 2Q,x 491 -11, 17. Otto Kroutil, Senior Plainer, presented the staff report. Chairman Stout1 stated that he thought the County's f'oothil'l Community _.Plan showed Wilson extended across to Etiwanda, Paul Rouaeau, City, Traffic Engineer, explai d that the Foothill Community Plan shows a street in the general vicinity 0 Wilson which extends across to 24th Street in Etiwanda. He advised that 8aiiyan is to extend to Etiwanda and that,staff would be initiatinj an amendment to the City's Circulation plan in the very near,,fut'ire.. iia further stated that the issue, n(ec+s to be more 6oseiy studied as to whether the curve from Wilson tU Miltrken should be retained. Chairman Stout was concerned that it looks like the City has turned its back on the area north of Highland. He suggested that if the City war) going to correct 8anyon on, the Circulation Plan, 'iilsan should be studied at the same time. He then gk.ined the publI;fc hearing. Tracy Lowman Tibbels, 10522 Wilson,:;(ancho Cucamonga, addressed the Commission on behalf of himself as a resident, d also on behalf of the landowner__ H felt that 2 -4 units per acre was a sebmingly appropriate designation for th site. He suggested that the Commission continue its decision on thil� amendment for 80 days to allow the landowner to meet with City staf,�, surrounding homeowners and Chaffey College. He indicated that the landowner`: would then bring a project proposal to City. Jim Delorie, representing Chaffey College, supported the Low Density designation. He pointed or,,`. that on the east border of the college there not only are atheletic fields, 'but ado undeveloped land that has been desi9fated by the college specifically for 0141d study. Further, that the college had no intention of ever developing that land. He encouraged discussions between the landowner and the Gullege in corder to develop a more coherent idea o How the land will be used. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Chairman Stout stated that he would like to see what the project proposal might look tike on this site. He felt this might be an appropriate direction to take prior to making a decision on the amendment. Planning Commission Minutes -2R September 24, 190 _ /4 1(� 11 ;t Commissioner 64er stated that he had no hesitancy in voting at this time. He stated that the -appropriate designation shou:d be Very Low. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he was on the Commission at the time the up -ies filed on this,piec"f property and one of the things the Commission was ,quite cG►;ce�ned _ oy' was the edge treatment between the College and this cite, He ezpiained'that it was decid -d at that time that the higher density wo %d— allow clustering of the units 6"Ad provide open space. He thought that the final project mitigated the concerns of the beer Creek residents in that - allowed transition between their property and this project and the tiustering of buildings, open space and *tJ edge tr¢,atment also addressed Itself to the College s needs. It seeaiaKf that the reason the proje -t was ., never built was because it was not economric6ly feasible to do so. F;e Oointed out that if the project was developed: at 4�' *inits per acre, there would be, -a terrible grading problem. He felt that the Lbw designation would not protside a proper transition and the only project alternetive would be Very Low. COWJ, <sioner Chiti{ea stated that her incl natlotw` were the same and agreed that tfery Low seet4d to be the appropriate d*49nation.° Comoa,isioner McNiel stated that, heP' id not have an objection to the Low designation. OttO KPoutil, Senior Planner, advised that the ,City t, �Jicant on this amenckent request. He asked counsel if the City "could 4W—y-fate the am'endm'ent and readvertise it in this General Plan cyle `,as a requesi for Very Low density. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City .Attorney, advised that if t4,'Cit1 is willing to withdraw its request; It could reinitiate an mcendment to fiery Low. Joe Sevilla, representing the Pennhill ' Corporation, advised that some conceptual plans had been submitted on this prefect to City staff. He fact that the request for the continuance would give everyone the opportunity to see what a good developer can do with this piece of property. He felt that he could solve all of the concerns of everyone i0volved.. He asked for time to approach Chaffey College and the Deer Creek Homeowners to show them the conceptual plans and then present them to the Commission before they make a decision on this piece of property. Mr. Buller pointed out that {phis amendment is for land use and the applicant could cove back with a proposal, but there would be no guarantee that this is the way the project would be built. He suggested that If the Commission's direction would be to continue the amendment request for 90 days, _ +aff coulo advertise the amendment as eithe` Low or Very Low. He asked if the Coaaission wound like the proposal by the :5ppiicant to be conceptual or should the applicant file a tentative asap concurrently with the amendment. Planning Commission Minutes. -21- SspteMber724, 1986 'r Commissioner Tolstay stated j�►at the problem 'he would have with filing the tentative map concurrently, itithat if the Commission feels the sit *, ?houid Very Low, the applicant would have made the expense of designing 'she z" act t, the Low designation. I r j :yam Sterpa, W., Glen Qaks, Glendale, Calff6rnia, property awner, was concerF*d that•the Cow ssi',i was once again considc*,tnj reducing the,:4ensity on his property. ite advised that he has been in 6giatiations with t)is project ,many timos. F, did not feel he could .find a buyer who ,could be willing to comply wit h one or one - half.. acre l o£s i U •hel ow the property they e ! _ . is a 12 unit per, acre projwc . Hr )dvised that while he would not be extreeely happy about it, he would accept the 24 unit per acre'6es1gnation.. Ile stated that a Very Low designation would seriously inh3D;t 'IV rmarketability of the ;property. Motion: Moved by S. art, seconded "b - 1-401olt. -to: coR inue the public tearing for Environmental egs nt dWW1�a'1° lan' Aamer lt=. W036 and Environmental AsSa ....ent and Development Di,sWfct x$-06 ` 'thr danunvy 14, 19487 PlanMrg Commission meeting. The lr ndowner is to r,,,jpiy the Co'mission- _ with a conceptual plan at the Low ; 00si gnati on. The L nceptual pli n i 6, to become a part of the priManant -�sr. d for comparizon of future appl��ations. Staff was direlcted to pr\0vi4e., 1ptions at bath the Law aaad VO-y Low designations. M. ENVl@Q MENTAL ASSESS0T A0 GENERAL PLAN AMENDME10 86-03E - CITY or RARC CCUCAFg3 C request amrem an_ se em col at tile UnMraM Man rod"W% /Professional to Medium Density Residential (4-14 du /ac for �,56 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Church and Archibald - APN 1077-332-26. ENVIR08iMENTAb ASSESSMENT AL+D ^EY;4 OPMENT OISTRICT AMENDMENT 86 -06 - CITk' O 7CISKs11 NI�M48C n ae6lW �Ra- a,rTwr.. r�°T'!R'T_ ._ _ __ _ °OP - _te •',V_FN-du /ac) for 3.56 aches of land located at the�sou he�sx'' corner of Ciaurch and Archibald - APSE 1077.132 -26. Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Stout asked for cla;{iication as to why this amendment was proposed, Brad Buller, City Planner, advised that the City Council directed that all' Office professional parcels in the City outside the Haven Corridor be re- evaluated. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Lloyd Michael, 6320 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, co -o%mer of the parcel, opposed the amendment. He did not agree that all Office Professional should be located on Haven Avenue and felt the property was appropriately designated. Planning commission Minutes -22- September 24, 194 c CITY OF RUNCHO CUCzuV10XGA STAFF REPORT F 6 2. jr DATE: September A, 1986 1977 TO; Chairman and Bees of the Planning;' moission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENYIRONMiENTN4' ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -030' - CITY OF X reques t to amend t e an Use ElenervC1110 fie enerac Plan from Low Medipm Density Residential 1448 di /ac) to Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) for ,,,666 acres of land located at the *sontnwest corner of 4Ft"6son (if extended) and Milliken (if eA*,ended) - APN 201. 141 -11, 17. ENVl1:dW!ENTAL ASMSS14ENT AND DEVFLOPKHT DISTRICT AMEN request to amend the ve opivn t District map ran 'FC" (Flood Control) and "LM" (Lour Mediuc Density Residential - 4 -8 du /ac) to "L" (Loaf Density Residential - 2- 4r;du /ac) for 66 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Wilson (if extended) and Miliiken,lif extended) - APN 201- = 191 -11, 17. I. ABSTRACT: Recently, `ihe City Cauncil directed the sta €f to initiate a General Pran Amendment for the area a..ist of Chaffey j College bounded by Wilson, Banyan and Deer Creek Channel. The request is for a change from LM (4.8 du /ac) to L (2 -4 du /ac). In conjunction with this Amendmen,:, staff has initiated a development � District Amendm96L from LM and K to L to assure consistency between the General Plan and ue ilopment District Maps (see Exhibit II. BACKGROUND: In 1982, the Planning Commission approved a ev3- e- 'lopment proposal (TT 11550) for 508 copdominiums and 8 tingle family dwellings far majority of th9 - -;te. In 1984, the Planning Commission approved an extensia -r -she tract map for two years. In June of this year, the project proponent requested an extension again, but it was denied by the Planning Comnissioa. The project exGs:.red in July of this year. The eas'zernmost 140 feet of the area, bounded by the college, Wilson, Danyr:n and the Channel (see Exhibit "B "), is currently designated FC on the Development District Mafia, LM of the General Plan, and belongs to the Flood Control District. In order to avoid fragmentation of future land arse, this 140 foot wide strip is /3 i i PLANNIRG COHNI SSI'ON c F REPORT f GPA 86 -030 -'CITY OF ACNO CUCAMONGA September 24, 1986 Page 2 i -hided in this �f ndment. If approved, this r' lmendwpt.;,ould result in the entire area being designated L under both *;fie General Plan and the Development Code. The Flood, Control Distract.is not opposed to the 5kangc•. _ III, PROJECT AND SItj DESCRIIPTIONi A. Action Requested• Change 1) The General Plan'-Land Use Mep Tra- i.or►- Efeai= Tensity Residential (4 -8 du /ac) to Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac), and Z) The Development District Map from L;bel *dium Resident al(4 -8 du/ac)/Flood Control to Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). B. Locations South.side Of Wilson Aver,ve (if extended) and west o7-gf ifken Avenue (if extended). 5` C. Parcel Size: 66 acres of land. D. Existing Land Use: Vacant,'undeweloned, E. Surrounding Lsnd Use and Zonirm, Yo - Fxtsting----T, a mity residential (Deer rreek), designatej-i'ery Love Residential (less than 2 du /ac), vacant, designated Very Low Residential (less than 2 du /ac). South Vacant, designated Low- Medium Residential (4- 8- du /ac) East - Vacant, designated Flood Control. West - Chaffey College, designated Low- b(4dium Residential (4 -8 du /ac.. G. General Plan D�esi nat�� Project T y -L �ions: u-*- tensity Residential (4 -8 du /ac). North e Ver •Low 8 si ie (less /ac). South La - Medium Oen tyResidentia(- 8du /ac) East - Flood Control. West - Chaffey College (Public Facilities). IV. ANALYSIS: The site i�-, situated between properties with General an s gnations of Very. Low (less than 2 du;ac) to the north, and Low - indium (4-8 du /ac) to tip south. As a result, there is a lack of appropriate transition in land use. To make matters worse, the existing Deer Creek subdivision on the north side of Wilson, is developed in one acre residential lots, while the''subicct site permits development of up to 8 du /ac. This :wises obvious compatibility questions, particularly along Wilson Avenue. f, =ice W, I F REPORT -. - - -, �. .-sj` September i4 "1 6 OF NCNO CUCAMONGA , J Page 3 The subj4tt site is also situated be like cell c between a semi -rural and park the east. anus to the west and .a large Flood Control area to Agai "n, the existing General Plan designation does not provide for an approprU4 transition of land use, The proposed change to Lora Density ty Residential "t2 -4 du /ac) would appear to L Provide for better land use transitions, while acroaodattng a reasonable level of land uses. cvelopwent compatible with all surrounding �` v The General Plan describes`--l"10 Lori Densitky category as follows: "The"low density residential classification is characteriized by single - family homes. The density is appropriate where the traditional r, eighborhood character of detached single - family itnits preyatls and where the level of service including roads, shopping a'nd recreation are not,sufficient to justify a higher density," The subject area is saeti- rural in nature and characterized by detached recreation homes with na commercial establishw g+g _,; or recreation facilities nearby. The public Re,sidential appears consistent with the neeral Plan c ter Dnnsall respects V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESWNT; �e Initial Study has been c alt no s gn can a verse environmental impacts were iiddentifie Lo be associated with the proposal. VI. FACTS FOR FINDIMS• Should the Commission, upon examination of the su ec klz Tan Amendoent and Development District Amendment, decide that the change would promote the land use goals and General Plan, would not be materially detrimental to�lthee adjacent properties or would not cause significant adverse environmental impacts, the following are the findings that are necessary upon approval: A. fThe Amendments do not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the Gene' al Plan, and 8- The Amendments do promote goals of the Land Use Element; and C. The Amendments would not he materially injurious or detr ±mental to the adjacent properties; and G. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms, of access, sf=e, and compatibility with existing land use in surrounding areas. C Pki1N!l +IIIl WIzSs' �t F REPORT _ GP11 86 -034 - CIrT` ,13F" NC!!O CllCAt60ti6K Sop ember 241 1986 r? Page 4 VT. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The j 1}'AD Ite erl; newseaper. The property was posted , and not were s r to a property owners within 34u feet of the project;,site, VII. RECiiMODATION: Staff mkoMiends approval of the Amendments. If the C'imm —iss on Mods the Amendments to the General 'Plan, and Development t, District Mal;s warranted, adoption of the attached Resolutions recommending approval to the City Council of the General plan and i Development District dleendeentr ` and the issuance of a %gajive Declaration would be appropHate. Re tfut f s ted ` ra utter % City Planner BB:RYtko 1 Attachments: Exhi bit ? :9 (� General er-al Plan and Development District Flaps i Exhibit "B" Flood Control property ResoUtion,of Approval e Generaf flan y .r .r L LMT LM �r I L KO Fc CARYN u " ! PLANN €�? €... gyp -C M'0 E M COPs1l149U1if4Y r Im Deveiepment Districts (/ v NORTH IRAI 'CHO CUC NIONGA j,,zLE: PLANNING DIVISION' =I � LXI IISM �IJ.S' X9:5a l TP _ r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Wsw1r.r 0 Z DATE: February 25, 1987 U 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VARIP9CE 87 -01 - LANE - A request to reduce the minimum front yard se ac rom 37 feet to 31 feet for Lot 6 and from 37 feet to 27 feet for Lot 5, on a 1.65 acre tract in the Low Residential tlistieict (2 -4 dwelling units /acre); located on the west side of Turner Avenue, south of Base Line Road at Ironwood Street - APN 1077- 041 -58. RELATED FILE-. TRACT 1i577 I. BACKGROUND: On November 26, 1980 the Planning Commission reviewed ana approved Tentative Tract 11577 for the subdivision of 1.65 acres into 7 lots. A "Condition of Approval ;Was attached to Tentative Tract 11577, prior to the adoption of the Development Code that stipulates an average 25 foot front yard setback, as measured from property line. This setback requirement is consistent with the existing homes along Ironwood Street. However, in that the current Development Code requires a greater front yard setback, the setback line shown on the Tract Map are no longer valid and cannot be permitted without a variance. II. ANALYSIS: The applicant proposes tr build single - family homes on 15 -W,000 square feet) and Lot 6 (8,000 square feet), in Tract 11577. The proposed homes are approximately 1,450 square feet having similar architectural character to the surrounding neighborhood. In order to meet the average front yard setback of 37 feet from curb face, per the Development Code (Section 17.08.040 -8), the applicant is requesting a Variance allowing a reduction to 31 feet (Lot 6) avid 27 feet (Lot 5), respectively, as measured from the ultimate curb face, while also providing a .jinimum of i:: feet usable rear yard area (Section 17.08.040J). The applicant has ettemptea to re -plot the two (2) proposed homes to meet the 15 foot usable rear yard, however, the re- plotting of these units falls short of the required 37 foot front yard setback. The applicant desires to decrease the required front yard setback by 6 feet for Lot 6 and 10 feet for Lot 5. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Development Cc*, requires that the ann ng ss of wke certain findings before a Variance can be granted,. Based on the following. facts, staff belie v re i 1pprovaTt justification to make the necessary find s o'? ITEM F PLANNING COMMISS16H STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 87 -01 LANE February 25, 1987 Page 2 1. The required 31 foot miMmumm front yard setback cannot be achiev_d, as shown in Exhibit "D ", and still maintain 15 foot minimum usable rear yard area. 2. The creation of sub - standard front yard setback3 of 27 feet '(Lot 5) and 31 feet (Lot 6) results from the strict interpretation of the Development Code. Tract 11577 was approved under Resolution 80 -72 with Overage 25 foot front yard setback prior to the adoption of the Development Code. The current code requires an average 37 foot setback from curb which can vary -_1-5 feet. 3. The surrounding neighlyorhood has an average 25 foot front yard setback frp' >l property line (37 feet from? and face), 4. The Variance, as specified in the application, will not contradict the goals or objectives of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan or Development Code and will not promote a detrimental condition to the persons or properties in the immediate vicinity. 5. The existing Ironwood Street was approved as an offset cul-de-sac placing a limitation on tot 5 & 6 in terms of lot depth. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing i em in The -6aily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to al I property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. V. RECOWENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission- review and a apt the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submmitte Brad Buller City Planner BB :HF :te Attachments: 'Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" T ApproAd Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Proposed Setbacks Resolution of Approval F� e B C NORTH "ITY OF PLANNhNG 'JIULSK>. EXHIBIT• SCALD �UKt ROf1i T_ / r„ LOT 48 IS rr t teaaraao�'"�.sa' L' 0 ,�- s-ct^' a "• .� �b � m LOT S C °� --� _ llo-_ i .. � 1�•� -JCL! ��` p �i ` __...1. Ivt. �J 4783 C NORTH "ITY OF PLANNhNG 'JIULSK>. EXHIBIT• SCALD 1 Y as a .y a 49 z Y l sr V NORTH CM or- RANCHO CUCA. O-NGA Trrt.: Yr` •'' PLANNING DIVISIQN F_Xtil tT=� --- i5 ,I Y l sr V NORTH CM or- RANCHO CUCA. O-NGA Trrt.: Yr` •'' PLANNING DIVISIQN F_Xtil tT=� --- i5 X 5 \! NOIZITH CITY OF rrc�i: 112 e7- aI' PLANNING Dit'SIQX F- Xfitmv -'"2' SG�►LC: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO e6CAHONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. -87-M TO REDUCE MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK FRO14 37 FEET TO 31 FEET FOR LOT 6 ANFT; FROM 37 FEET T6 117 FMT FOR LOT 5 FOR, TRACT 11577 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF TURNER AVENUE, SOUTH OF BA,cELINE ROAD AT QORWOOD STRUT IN THE LOW NISIDENTIAL DISTRICT - APH 1077- 031 -58 A. RECITALS - (i) WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of January, 1987, an application was filiod snd accepted on the above - described project; and (ii) WHERRAS, on this 26th day of February, 1987, the Pl�lning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 66854 of the California Government Code. (iii) WHEREAS,' ors " 7th day of December, 19'83, the City Council of the ct4 of Rancho C nga adopted. Ordinance 211 establishing setback requirements for resi4e tfal districts. B. RESOLUTIOU NOW, THEREFORE,_ the�''Rancho C;. 'amonga Pyt6nin; ComMission resolved as follows: 1. ThiE Commission hereby specifically, finti- that ail: -che facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, t %.itis Resolution are true aAd correct. 2. Based upon *substantial avid slue presenzedl do this Commission during the above - referenced. Februaw 25, 1997 hearing, including the written stcff report, and 6KK written, signed and verified . application of -the applicant, this Commission hereby specific, ty finds as follows: a. `me application apples to lots 5 and 6 of T-.�ct 11577 which is located on- he west side of Turner Avenue at Ironwood Street; b. The dbject properties are heated in the Low Residential District. The surrounding properties to the north, Kest and east are alto in the Low Residential District. The surrounding properties to the south are in the Low- Medium Residential District, C. The required 37 foot average frond, yarA setback cannot be achieved .using the'apprdved Floor plats and sill maintain the . required 35 foot - inimum usable rear yard area Planning Comimission Resolution VARIANCE 87 -01 - LAN February 25, 1587 Page 2 d.. The creation of ,ub—tendard front'Jard 'setbacks of ?7''feet (Lot' 5) and & feet (Lox O results from the strict interpretation of the Development Code, Trac1:,11577 was appr red under Resolution 80 -72 with av�rage 25 foot front yard se.aback (from property linel prior to the adoptfon of the Development Code. The Development code regAires a 37 foot •average front bard seaack ;,from curb, face) which i � vary t5 feet; e., Existing surrounding properties all have ari average 25 fr .-)t front:yard setbacks from property line (37 ftmt from curb), f. The Variance as specified in the application W1l ±at ciktradict the goals or obdactives of the Rancho Cucamonga General plan or Developrerm Code And will not pr mote a, detrimental cond#tion to the persons or properties in the mediate vicinity. 30 Based upon substantial evidencr presented to this Commission during the abave- referenced February 25, 1587 hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth In Paragrap►is 1 and 2 abc ;e, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows, a. That stOct of literal interpretation and e enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practUai difficulty or urine; :4ssary physical hardship_ inconsistent Wth the ob3ectives of `,:toe, Developkdnt Code_ b. Uat there are exceutional or extraordinary circumstances or Fonditions applicable to the property revolved or to the intea2l %d use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same di '`rict. c. That stMit or literal interpretation and - enforcement of the specified regulatit,a would deprive the applicant of privilegess enjoyea by tiro owners of other properties in the same district. d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant J specia; privilege inconsistent with the limitatf.•is .un other properties classified in the saw district. e. That the granting of the Variance will aot be detrimental to the public bealth, safety,, or welfare, or mat.riaily injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragripk- 1, 2 and 3 move, this Commission hereby approves Variarcw $7 -01. r Prr (la}�(fi��nc Css,ffr�i,{�ri +/� on F4t februau 25•01cI93T 1 APPR6ig A0 ADOPTM -MIS 25T.4 DIY OF �BRMY, 498% PLAHtiI* CCMISSION OF 7, UTY OF RANCHO CUCl ,4U BY: Mi d a er, ra;t ATTEST 'r`a Eiger, pu y SijFrewfy-- r. t I, brad Buller, Dept( Sa�rreurr of the P1aajnjng ,:Qwssfoff of 'the CIV or r. Rancho Cucaact p, daa hOaby- Awtify that the fofigoin� ReF-- lutiot was drily aqd regaelmly: Sii irodu -passsd, and adopted %yy *ha P7,t:t4fing, CONCSS10ft of the C-iV, of Rancho Cuoaar gsk at a replan we ar'the blaming. Commission h%*,td Uri, the 25th . ' of. tebruaryt, 1987, by the fttllaWj , RTES G"ISSION ,I ASSENT: Ct? RISSIONER5: l I 111:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUC:AMONGA; STAFF REPORIL` DATE: February 25, 1987 T0; Chairman .and Members of the Pla siin^ Commission rRCM: Brad @Alai,, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistr9t Planner SUBJECT;: VzV[R6NMENTAL `AySESSAENT AND TEO kIYE TRACT 13475 - W.O.S. UL9ELUFMLNT "- ; A -sus om Tot su , vd s an a parse s on acres of ivrd in the Low Di nsity Residential District . (2 -4 dwelling uidts per rare), located on the east side of Ramona Avenue; north oir Church Street. Associated with this application Is Tree Removal, Perait 86 -64 requesting the removal of the exist!$$ four (4) Eucalyptus windrows APN: 1073- 301 -33. I. PROJECT ANA D SITE - ?EZRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approv4Y of,, t'e subdivision design, coacepeua grading plan, trsy'removat permit, W14 issuance of a Negative Declaration for a %24 lot subdi,rision. ,r B. ProJecy Density; 3.65 dwelling un:cs per acre. i C. Su"6.undinq tarsi! Use and . %oni o� rig a family residential, Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South - Single family residential, t:sw Density Residential (2-4-du/ac) East Single family resrd_ntial, Low Density Residential (P -4 du /ate- West - Single family residential, Lora Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) D. Geveral Plan Designations: ec i 'e - ow, enzfiy Residential (2 -4 du /ac) North - Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) .ouch Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Low Density Residential (2 -4 du/ac)" West - Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) E. Site Characteristics The site is currently vacant with a 2 s npe` —irom n(.+r- o south. There, are four Eucalyptus windrows located to on the site. Mature wft3rows, are located aloe the north and east property boundaries, with two, less mature ITEM :G FLANFill}�"b I&TV0 �i° F REPORT Tentattive. tract WO5 Development February .25, 1987 Page it �.! windrows on the interior of the site direction and the other in a north south Jirectiton.en east -west IL. ANA —�Sa. A. General: The project is being su ''ts on of 29 lots ranging sizelfrom 7,440 square feet to 17,300 square feet in area. extend Teak Way from the northErne %sife auoundtract map will Street. Also, an internal street will connect Teak Way with Ramona Avenue. The cul-de-sac a,'f of Te k Way y to Church . provide for the future development of the Pa lYl,4 CO orwthe cornea Of Street and Ramona AvenU1, B. Desi n Review, Committees The Oesian Review Committee + ar er, anon rev ewed the project on Janar 2,( av and recommended approyal subject to the following conditions; L ft.grove Street Sbould be curved to eliminate the straight coinlinction between Ramona Aven,' and Teak Way, � 2, The grading plan should be revised' to variable ,front yard setbacks with an overall average of 37 feet as Measured fr,,m face of curb, 3. The building setbact,'iines should be eliminated from the Tentative Tra;,y (gap. 4, Yew Court should be extended twenty (20) fr2t to the West 'to pror;de for the future development of the cc"Mer paF cel . Upon further analysis, staff felt that the cul -de -sac should be finished aff as originally proposed by the applicant provided that the right of way for Yew Court was expanded to Include the arer< bound l by lines parallel to the street centerline extending to the west tract boundary as shown in Exhibit "D", This additional dedication will allow for the future reconstruct,on Or :street improvements as the corner parcel develops. C- Tree RemovalPermit- In conjunction with the tentative tract P aPP ca tonne app's #cant has submitted a tree remot,al permit requesting the removal of the for (4) e,isting Eucalyptus windrows located od the site (see Exhibit "E'' }: The Tree Preservation Ordinance states that where existing Eucalyptus windrows are to be removed, they shall be replaced . G - z PANNING COMMiISS10N STAFF REPORT Te tative Tract '13476 - SIDS Development Fegruary 25, 1987 _ Page 3 with Eucalyptus enaculata along . tie established grid pattern in 15 gallon size minimmr spaced a Ieight (8) feet on center and I properly staked. S,�Off feels th�t replacement of the windrows along the north apa east pro erty boundaries would be an appropriate condition placed o she tentative tract crap and tree removal applications. leplacement of the scattered windrows on the interior of a site would be accomplished k throigh installation of str"A trees approved by the City Planner. D. ''Environmental Assessment: ?il Staff has completed the Envi ron►aen a ec is and ,2 and no significant adverse environmental impacts a$ a. result of this project. if the Cov€aission concurs with these Findings, the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order if the Tentative Tract Map is approved. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan an4 Devel opment Code. The project -will not be detrimental to the public, health or safety, or, 'cause nuisances or significant adverse envi'rdnmt<nta7 impacts. I;: 'addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with applicable provisions of the Devviopment i Code and My Standards. J IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a public hearing and notices were sent o a proper owners within 300 feet of the project site, V. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the 'Planning Commission approve en a 'i-ve Tract trap 13475 through adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions, approve TreeRemoval Permit 86 -64, and issue a Negative-Declaration. Rectfully itt d, Srad 8u lei City Planner BB:SM:ns Attachments: Exhibit 'IN, - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Yew Court Dedication Exhibit "E" - Tree Removal Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions n a N N ♦, • r ! a\ �{ —.. :� '. ai Y � N { { , • M I, T! ' \i .! M N M .\ O .I. .t q r� - �1•, i1 \e � / Y is �/ ` p a. ! ' F. ' N �.. w • 1 w f a• i M w i a .0 1� j ♦ r s, YY r" li Y 4 It Tf- T. M-. I. I. f I'f IN F- WORTH � CITY OF I'ENI:rfy ECHO C%C �IOITGA PLANNING DrdISiGV EYHIMT =-- 4 SGIL 6 PL a --- w,.. r«., .+.` s.rs vw. ju. "y� �� t. QrItJi6JlmyZ H� 1 \ �Tv,Y _ �• ZY� ••C .e.. ..i» -.; Sri w.© •� A 4f 3L� ..rig � _® 111 w". � r u� � ZS d'a�+ �� • i� �� . '� I iii N L URTH. CII OF nmi- RA CT- CUCAiv1C. NGA TrrLE : ��, Ac"a ALUM 25 sir i i ! ZV)RTF. RCl/tT7`�l' Cppp?yyy, //^ CUkM n-a t: .s ScLLE Ar ,c .tom �.�'a. •.. � r «`� �� -" "'• � 4 69, 0 i Ll f gcr _ lk Sol x7 77 Vi E r: F<. v" s : v �, •� c'�a ��t._.._.. as t . A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ,,,�/ „��r < c ^ ,� •, �A+, PLANLNIIG IX4'it 6 - E�CHIBI'I'; r � e, FS 1-5 i 27� ` p pD}YRtBT /i i .....� ~• L...J' as I F1,104L EL 13 -X I / v i � • II CY�L� �p zo . >�_ �•' l7 w.. ._.. f I>r.� i it j CMACH w/• - -fur' , i Imo' , NORTH CITY OF ITEM, PLANNING DNISION � aG EXHIBIT._ I RESOLUTION NO. } -A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO*f SSION "OF THE CITY OF ' RANCHO CUCAhONGA, CALFFORNI� - C`ONDT,$1(1Ndx k Y APPROVING TENTATI-VE TRACT 14AP NO. 134M —, WHEREiiS, Tantatfve fract Kip No. 13475 hereinafter "Map" submitted by WOS Development, applicant, for the purpose of s4bdividing'i he real property � situated in the City of Rancho Cucammonga, County 4�f :an rternardinoi, State of California, described as a res''d-giial subdivision of 29 "its on 7.94 acres of la id located on the east side. of Ramona Av6ue, north of -March Street (APP: 10il- 301. -38), regularly carne before the Planning Commission far`;! {blic hearing and action on.February 26, 1487; and WHEREAS; the City Piawner has recommended approval of the Map,, subject to all dondztions set forth`,-Ii the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; ana WHEREAS, , the Planning Commission has read and considered ,_5e Engineering and Planning Division's reports reports and. has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. , NOW, THEREFORE, the 2fanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve at follows: ' SECTION 1: The Planaing� Commission makes the, follow -,a findings, in regard to e�Te— aT ve Tract No. 13475 and thaw Map thereof. (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plar., Development Code, and specific plans; (b) the design or improvements of the tentative tract, is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The .iite is physically` suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of tyre subdivision is not likely to cause subst,;;tial environmental damage and ar`aidable inj( y to hu.tat.s and wildlife or tti0r habitat, i (e) Tte tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public ;health problems; (f) The 0sign of the tentat'lve tract will not conflict whir" any easement acg0red by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. f� t~ G ,R Re „.elution tiro. Ient,,tive Tract Yap No. 1347'5: February 25, 1587 Page 2 i f91; That this ~project�will not create adverse impacts on _ the environment aatd a Negative Declaration; is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map 1k;. 13475, a copy of which is attached Ke- e” to, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions :.and the attached Standard Condition,*� PLANNING DIVISION: 1. Mangrove Street shall be curved to eliminate tip, "straight connection between Ramona Avenue and Teak Way,., The cent<Aine of Mangrove Street shall be shifted four feet to the north where it intersects Ramona Avenuer The centerline of Mangrove Street shall be shifted four feet to the south where it,' intersects Teak Nay,. 2. Priq't to tH�Assuance of grading permits, the `grading plan and plot plan shall be revised: to proviae variation in the front yard setbacks to the satisfaction of the City Planner. r' 3. The building setback lines sht.1 be eliminated frdp the tract map prior to recordation. ' 4. Variable lot widths shall be provided 71r Lots 8 -14 to the satisfaction of the City Planner. S. Eucalyptus maculata shall be planted at 8 feet on center along the north and east ,property boundaries. The replacement trees shall +be indicated on the landscape plan submitted for review and apgrovai by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building wrai ts. ENGINEERING DIVISIOV 1. The existing overhead, utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of the street shall _be undergrounded prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first as follows: a. Ramona Street - from the utility pole existing at the north project boundary to the first pole south of the south,roject boundary. b. Church Street - from the first pole west of the west project boundary to the first pole east of the east .project boundary. k c. Extending from Ramona Avenue easterly within the project site f - shall be either undergrounded or removed. Reimbursement of one -half the City adopted cost 6 for undergrovnding from future development`` as it occurs on the opposite side of either street is not feasible, because the '- property is presently developed'_ Resolution No. Tentative Tract Map No. 13475 �I February 25, 1987 Page 3 2. Intersection 7drains shall be constructed at the toterseciion- of Teak -Way an,'-Church Street or as otherwise determined by tWe City` Engineer. 3. Speciar dooinage d`vices shall be cnnstructat for Lots 151, 16,;,17 and flows through the curl, onto Church Street. 4. The right of way for Yew Court shal' be expanded to include the area bounded f� 'tines parallel to the .street centerline and tangent to the 50 foot radius curves oa bw,4 sides of;the_.street and the west tract: boundar•. This additional right of -011 allow for the future reconstruction of the street improv(wants. to the west as necessary for future development of the property to the west. BUILDING DIVISION 1. Lots 8 -11 shall be towered to eliminate cross -lot `dr'ainag'e and reduce driveway Spades. 2. Lots 27 -24 shall be revised to drainto Ramona AvenV,6. 3> The cross -lot drainage to t a corner parcel shall be eliminated. APPROVED AND ADOPTED T3IS 25TH DAY OF FEB:UARY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: 1_ avid ar er, ai rman ATTEST: Brad u er, apt` ., Secretary j I I, 8t z-_1 Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning ConL ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly .and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Punning Gotmnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Pl-anninq " ortrri ssion held on the 264 day of February, 1987, by the Following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: -ll ^ L Y 0 M Yp •�G � O �N` A. Lt i; CC L � ■Y .syy.yai�'a �5ai °"'-�yyr a$� as �c� i'�w+$.�C� ��`i, a, �. `".� +fir. ,, •sA�,. `�y� sue= Tug °o 4 � a IL Ut-I o )� €s yyyaI y4 „^ e K A S g{, ON A} .i �i •�F �� . wage wF %cT.� WNi�o ` g, Oi1fi�5 »° 3=2 4 : �r K N A+1 1 \ ' 3SuHeID -m O_ „ONM P q✓.'LY 4R 'C MCO 4��5 g4 N, S C I T C 6 ^ L Y 0 M Yp •�G � O �N` A. Lt i; CC L � ■Y .syy.yai�'a �5ai °"'-�yyr a$� as �c� i'�w+$.�C� ��`i, a, �. `".� +fir. ,, •sA�,. `�y� sue= Tug °o 4 � a IL Ut-I o )� €s yyyaI y4 „^ e K A S g{, ON A} .i �i •�F �� . wage wF %cT.� WNi�o ` g, Oi1fi�5 »° 3=2 4 : �r K N A+1 1 \ P q✓.'LY 4R 'C MCO 55 11.14 T C 6 +� M Y!� � %a= Y. a ♦�` S � y R y��0p� O Le Vy Y A tt. gy II$RY. y� sa l pL td~PYYQtl epi4�'�.Yi .t 1, 0 LTA � w Fs b¢YP M VV � W. Y� � � a i r I� 4s+1.'�•a �r..- Z IL l E ®b #.3•.0 In �” V �m 03Ye �'II �� 4axRi Ypp. L d ~y O „�B @fib ~N '� �� . th .C� i t] 4 � w S llw Y3 V ML�.�• _ KLi 0701 -02 o 2 -25 -7 PG A enda 3 4w k� 2 M U d O L. CL E 1 T O tl a p L fiy b,_N. +G L.Yl6W Y OOM �CZY p+ WpN �S' O. �MZ O. y =O VCY� O4 M ^yQ V�p. rC Cy4V ^: dN� VANw Vy p1 +�pp ff// uu @ @6 vC L FO 'S � •� "LU. lei 6 C. �N �.Y r� b plV94YC�Oa°i Cyo aG y�U. YOI ax C u. oa Y tM Mw� 003. +pCbL�'L �f=r66 L MJY°� SOS G•.Q Oa •+ a (f NO' >:E •iTaCAYt �. JJV to H VM� a.V q �CEPU ji4l VYy�. &O R E «�.. C 0�9 pppppppp 1' u � 1 ,a ° d G ` u N C V Y M M ` 1= ° ° C' Y Z `• in ai H 1 ap.. �`.a, ` L as. Vol I `'acj ati aN� ° N >a $ Y� o �.a ''ctla+°..d..� a µaYrk ^c+ ^° o g ° o ^poscYV « il'I�fi. '` i Z. aL° qCw�° Ate_ Y y�.M� Y♦•✓!lVVO'. SO 4gc.u.�' ppe.y Qo. SNa... QN is N4�iC V +� R V � ~�Y 6p�. yq L 5:69 Yu, JM CL Y+IOY^ 0.NOm m � a8° u y{�o' «sg ; aa`i,•'W.we �+. t M N 5g Y4 V'_ R }� "'. ir'"'' Sy�n'.'.'m .. v ° w 1e Y e Y' }p� Co.— y�� s $ ep� 4 Y S .TawpL� aAC YoQYO Two V�NR� +tJ a6>.v iY'a Nti mNg �o� is T4 w C YVy^ p A x y Y 1�.��rr s N O O� Y "' '3 on� AG OY „YF A .� vC`bW , SKIN &Nwp_a y`wy _c• CY � VOI• i IgpA yy yy �yA. ■ �ry y� @t� G N CQY a1r H�f.$ Y Cvd s CL C`If 0666 ,C,1 YOA Nli• H r01 C + ti N rrt 0 Yi s i f t 04'^ av� h°.41C �••N oy = 9•C dY ]��C� p °��CN L. a.TLC = al a�a' g ate°• u..c .L. 9 H !�, Vim � O 7 Y G 1► m. » u s 72 !Ak �y1(a ..yV Eq �. y Q V V w 0 ��` � N. .O C N L C A `. � b NF.. L R� •� p1. 6 �� {0, j C .4. Y L b e yee A •_• N ^ P 4 O N y C L 7' �i M c A >= i N. V, v1• r..;L. .C'�Y �L .. LW gypp• % °4u ..Tz L� GY ~^ L �v O v C 9 C L y y =6•°•a -a, a $ ,b � aR� �Y g• Ym iac�"��C�Y w4�g° °,c ca•°NI� � N T� y N •.• rQg ° Y y � C d v a �. M C0C O ✓� � C. >� N W u M O nO +C W� r >.b 6pP 4Nh.. C• 4Q�L$oLL O°I � w�eSLf aLb D=a• pw 4- c4'.°_Lagy : .cY N Ley L C x S Y u:LLO 6S t OV IIILx/// Cc G r a te ^ L 1� •°I pO a f N, ^ wwQ N CV � Y O'J°C. • C #. C V u. 0 A N �4 V O y V w M a N b N r Y V L C r a NEE Y V v� � Y O Y T i•. Y I Vr � O q� C O N C �. O ~� O m Y: a _G O Q Y O w 4 L Y 61� M W V IT T 9 O 4 4 b 4 �Gt C C ri 4 G C.6 V <s n L G h 4 L [3 K rui o N y w K Y 0 6 W OI + •C L y M N Y C K N ^ _o w �a �Cq Or L °�Z3 Oq d�a .+L ^ c =w Far. wr G , 04 MLYC d O� Sq0 CIL4 t C OVD yo•e. ^ L i�. 7u-a N�wV O dwgqM, 4�Sw..�c V ro a Y_ cr w« t_t YM P ^0.6 t.4. y Q 9 C t Y C Y p. u� O CM 2 G w M� L..a.�M Y^ V,FV a w uµ 4Y c i.TM .w ♦ Lp e Q.5gyg d.G`.8 �G s .ate qF O' LvroC nTa._ °mc YO'� ” �N t''. -c° Yro N Y q o. Ott a;; C� CN O. wEU� a��n�WC QHZ C za NBC K Cwr �o uqa Vp FL 4w �LFwe`o bf P P GfOOOD —IS A,.! 4.O C C G L M Y T Lp ~ Q V r v YO a O'..L. � ' _CC ,'d GY¢w^. tl ^ is G r tll t 6 GQt C —1z Y OE K~ uL� .p K O G.. i t j 9 IDS ^d Y k L* bp Qx Ca uN q.s =qdp wC.0 „M VpO ..dPOO TemS DCL wQd 'Ilk „C p6 p4p ��. p +q. O F.N w 4yCt bN ^ Y..VLY N..k bo ^�.. 9. �i4! �' N.l..j{QcQi �qY» V¢., 16 qiL VID �M cNp� T ea ap^ u pM ».��Vr 4d. bgQO'rr »yV }.� � m�L�M UY ».i:Uy cu p CL �wVC LM� jT`»C. P4 TG40'MBV NM« C`C �_ 9G� $� T' � .w `uyy L OG1 �C- 4 y o� S .. v GZ;R rei ■ �gil�dC tiY. Q L r ! oM 1 �pM 9 R0 Y VIZYbMN��g i +{Y¢ 4L9rppOHUaOkT� f:f� y s =p V4 Q} T d Y Wli~ pN V L; e'SN s tl 4L� '` s Y� tlC M i yypp M 1:5 4 Y✓ Y q L y+M�Y 3Q1�6Fi »`R��»M LU. QM Y4Yyw 'Y LL+ C4Vq R � EY y�IYi( YYYB YLM Rle; w. ^90410 ]$� tnrN4� ^ HS -C Ji90 4.2 �LG IN VVwi. a]. P�KOG o q 4��B L 6 V �teO• 1� MOM ^ _o w �a �Cq Or L °�Z3 Oq d�a .+L ^ c =w Far. wr G , 04 MLYC d O� Sq0 CIL4 t C OVD yo•e. ^ L i�. 7u-a N�wV O dwgqM, 4�Sw..�c V ro a Y_ cr w« t_t YM P ^0.6 t.4. y Q 9 C t Y C Y p. u� O CM 2 G w M� L..a.�M Y^ V,FV a w uµ 4Y c i.TM .w ♦ Lp e Q.5gyg d.G`.8 �G s .ate qF O' LvroC nTa._ °mc YO'� ” �N t''. -c° Yro N Y q o. Ott a;; C� CN O. wEU� a��n�WC QHZ C za NBC K Cwr �o uqa Vp FL 4w �LFwe`o tau ;XP C VU�pu CS cq q ^9,ww oYVm <Q.. CJCCN iOCtv�y `nr1` VV2S.. Gay 0.05- .yYC t"' W3tV OJyp YK LM J C w 4 EEEE Y � nnm "3 �.�. VLV. V y.0E06 w6C�C �,.6 b yy � ?O �• pw i� YL�. GqN ..YQiyy nN �iL ■L Yeaµ "CCCj Nv yaC. =. .emu f [JOT C VLS4 VeFY /3 ti LjY YY C O: S•Q y.JY+`� yrA � � � V `i'S"u6yCCw -p �y -w gOg>y` 9i Tj Ny..O. y�0 YNNWw ENV W aS yY g S u x _ aka ww m��, "N,'<�»: �Ir. :�•"CC��.... -,.___ w JAN �G �Yy ^�ppGGC. ®�, w�`' � yY p'y IGQYw� ��Cy ■G�AC b �y Gi~" SCC EwL.LNL. wap+J^ _ +VmV O C! SL� J �I�wy Op ;l.�Mwi •t+. p. �5j! { {� lip M V <L STiYI w5.� O Oa,O. NYS. Y µ� 6 11' =J�¢}$� F ap Y 1f� 'a . QYC {■.� yyw * Mt aR. nV6 y V Yy Y p�y y '.O + p<e aVL QGrt1'. ~ } o F Y6 'LC�O � p , M Y im Cw4.•+0wO . .' LY M w ~�p�•. � EG M O m y O YY 81 u 1�M • .3 21 .. ` 2pGT i ' �y Q Al -w ivi o 4i A 9 Lw _J 6M ZLWNiL 9i0 yC �YO Wi. Mif}3Y.N � $�•Y P' VI N O. UO , Y _ `a y � O tl • iM N � D N to �..oA`h �� .T'.o �p.YiO y0 rcY. •O+ wy 'Ja Z 4 NCp SGwJ er _ < a N Q p Y 0 3 G S D O �a y L p Y. M< Q i C4L- Y G • pY. n^ i► Y .K O 3 J A 6 �4 q• N 2b. S, 9 v�YY sQ a O iZor wt w.� u4 yiA V ®� c Z� TOy� cN .gy i�LOa $tG a m m� yS E ay S pr� 6py!• Q (.1 wC NYLC Y „Lya pL ^y0 y. 0...` G 52 e oc oaa." '- G u o Z. oay aM Sly ��. w3 •v .�'. �drpQ ` c 4�yij.� r � a x is I -a -w y Q q O E � C>, C QG 5 CL 2L 'O �^ YN !•dC ' Li . C .n _T Q• 0.6`x1 Y6 VN N ^.0 -A. OLY' 6N G y L Z p•.n <G _ HN E1C 3 ^�. 1' OY N 6 O E G a..�V. .. 23•� .IL6� < R6i� C{YNr Y N A < H N R A C3 z U a �n a oa� � Gb jN�O p p Y oC c a~ YY u i 6 01Y Yt10 a+ Yv L 5"'•O N `g YOic r BM.C. `` Ey yyMj "'.10a Y Z. 3Y M b ti. � `. eyg ■py 61M �.Y Y33 y �...i iu `� 4 AO a.V RY Vq f Y Y A Y� C ..L ♦. pp �i �3i�ii V ` O* •Y � L W °I° O�C� Y is C� ^G. N.2w O L.i -J, �h{ jam$ ,j r u YYNO"S yOR YYq�$�a5 .r Y� O` y Y.V. y d p CC ` a4.�`N +dal ul p u �. Y� �yyY A� �■ Y � � � Y��:�+ N� {N�� yY r Hit 22 . "3 O - i `. Y y� °• ti F Y YgAe ai p t ai . Y. N N� � A.6 y B '. �76aYi oa� � Gb jN�O p p Y oC c a~ YY u i 6 C Ov C a+ Yv L 5"'•O N `g YOic r BM.C. `` 3Y M Yy�Y��qy of «e°�i c� 'ab p Y oC c c ITS wy�Dp yY Y33 S 4 �Y�` a.V RY Vq f Y {afyYyNq p. ♦. Y' Y i V ` O* 4q + N N � i °I° O�C� Y is C� ^G. ` p u �. Y� G 22 . "3 O - i `. Y y� °• ti F Y YgAe ai p t ai . Y. N N� � A.6 y B '. �76aYi ��• Vo OZ ps. �,. Yi 'NUtie AC 9G °v. a tie°a. RPi,�V NyS'^'� jp�C = "Yeul• Cy Y N•i Oa. T. �r y� �Cp G� YW4 � F�Cy A. �pG MO y.�gV`CSY Ley Y.0 Mw `Ya C &4� �� sp� iL �bY '� Y YA gp4 Xm ay�C <F y.NA 4 W4V BYO �C11 'A6 w +A� 1i =;L% NY <�. RR BY p6Y MVp ♦ CH A K N.U9N� •�.G�l'�L N M 4 C N1t Pf < N1 10 tl«. V� t -. �L ;��'�.'�a ' ° °° a« . « € as S� p SLY' C� Ng9 >tl 32.. b S Y x w�tl 2« -0 z a u V at � �;� 7`— L. w 5 GY• pa°i � wY Y 15 i O � Y� °�g1 oe zyOl Y CN W Y4. au �«:Q OW �p6C. YVY. pw ax �rY� Y Y°ir l^Y.. O. L Y O tj 6� tl sFpU �.Q Cy V. `G Lq�w �tl ar «tltlL r M✓�: t WY pA �1 �. T= hY° TyaL, M��. ,¢ice Q� -.p. •Y 6'•S"L CJ9.. - Yy L «F M.i N•17 OwtlVtl Icu�6� CrM <H E... ?O�:a! a~ WrMLLLt i(i �9 V� <Yaie �p r n �W VW e E6w KM NI a t �' �S ^e41w �.. s ° ag a4 L v 0 =o... J a •' g� a rr. % °� �� a wa °tl� o� &m�e$ a Y E Q� ag N C C Sr Y� a: m wvt� Y c�� L YVJ E y 14L aM« ` N 1- ._. V Y SN = wJ .5 S.. qgii5 cv ` =.c O tL C�� 'a`V: +�C^ +L r4 c 3t� ■Y Y lFp L ds.1 ! »�+� ]r.�. Y. oaa �� G GAL viCm. O LwL �« « �t3 p. «L. pnCC' vGJC < C L 1Y 1 i �tpIpCN 4i +• < fly 2 � �rMM Y =VY. O L G. ONY L° C CY O L C NpW 4�. 66W yS�i VVV tl n 0 a $ r o qYs LPN a' i A YuM C" a C w�YL� p0 CC `cs ;. 8 L y �ZW •te °as 9- Ika �y L S� a coy^ r �Cp_» a.° oa ao :BCE 01co O L g,w ZeZ. y2�o kt Nn.t pv dry NY= 1y �O tv as Yuo VIM a � 6�py dN Co =Cw L wC`Y + Y N Cyr 6 4 N 4 Y Vy 44 .Vq pw �•'uI ~� .".• a �p1b' Di m$ YT No'g .LY.t ..`"7i+ J `j =Yi ti$�> a� a R rnv �Q ~y' �•• + ° �. ccwv .o..�N. N r o.. aw°1 M z.�. N o ,•.� 6 yc a iiu u suYe �1s1 V.- `ppz ss a a�i Y °u C-1 WO O ipW 9t �.nOU n 0 I, lu ---- CITY OF RANCRO CUC AM©NGA STAFF REPORT x � DATE: lebruary 25, 1987 19i7 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission. FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL uSE PERMIT 84-42 - ORATE - A two year review for compliance with e approve onditions of Approval of an established 1,650 square foot church within a 6,600 � square foot multi - tenant industrial building in the i General Industrial Area (Subarea 4) located on the southside of 6th Street east of Archibald Avenue APM: 210- 0) -48, I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Two year review of an established church. B. Purpose: To ascertain compliance with Conditions of Approval. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin vr-ojecz site - Multi-menant InguLstrial, ISP (Subarea 4) North - Multi - tenant Industrial, ISP (Subarea 4) South - Multi-tenant, ISP (Subarea 4) East - Warehousrng, ISP (Subarea 4) West - 'Vacant, ISP (Subarea 4) D. General Plan Designations: The church submitted plans to _ o5f1`7—n-Fu7Mn9 permits far an existing expansion into an adjoining suite. Project Site Gen:�rai Industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial E. Site Characteristics : The church is within a. multi- tenant -Fndustrial buflaing I n the ArchiCenter, 9375 Archibald. The project consists of eight (8) multi- tenant buildings. The entire site's .parking capacity is approximately 175 cars. At this time the center is not fully leased. — — J ITEM H Planning Cowd'ssfo A goda CUP 84-42'- ORATE 1 p ruary 25, t "' J a Poe 2 H. ANALYSIS: A. General: Staff has reVjiewed the church operation for - 000rMance with that Conditions of Approval`. An info�ml t - survey was also taken of grounding tenants. Al I of the tenants surveyed agree that the church did not have any_mlajer negative impacts on their businesses. however, one bdtiness requested that the parking spaces &t their front door be left open for their use since they a150 operate on the wr_ekends- The church has expanded its space. to twice the size of the approved square footage (see Exhibit "S "), This expansion dres - not conform to the original' approval and requires modification to the existing Conditional Use Permit undor Condition No. 5; and Developwt Coda Section 17,02.07OS. the applicant has been contacted and is aware of staff's findings and has agreed to comply the with modification request. III. FACTS FOR FINDiN6S: The church is aot in conformance with the,' or Tina on one of .Approval in that it has expanded its square k footage. f IV. CORRESPONDENCE., Phis item has peen advertised as a public hvzring Tn—M e a e ort newspaper, property posted, and notices were f senr. to property ovmer's within 300 feet of the project site. Y. RECOWNDATiON: The staff recoMaends that the Planning Comission i direct applicant to submit an.application for modification to their Conditional Ilse Permit within 30 days. j Respe!5 ully submitted, s rad Bull City Plan er BB:CW:vc AttachEtents s Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Resolution of Approval No. 85 -31 i r �` AWK klliG i livsyi i �` AWK klliG i livsyi iemeesri "r" laxewt`' /.YACUII e-- ..-- .. -�.J.. r�.� d/liC Q1} 1 1�ip, 171CaY / SdIY LYJRWIAEf(fgp , j V NORTH aTy O T � RANC-Tio cLCfimo rr�r[ PLANNING DIVMQN " F—xHi -T- L scALE; 74 A, w lilt ISO- 01 U1111iffill m r. MRTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLAN,iNG DjNqSK)j-q F-XHIMT- SCALE--O-Z';., \\ RESOLUTION NO. 85 -31 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMISSIOP+I AP.PROWNG CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84-42 FOR THE ESTABLISHNFAT OF A CHURCH FACILITY LOCATED AT 3375' ARCHIBALD AVEME1, SUITE 504, IN THE 8ENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT w WHEREAS, on th4- 10th day of December, 1984, a complete application was filed by Jim Orate for review of the above - described protect; and WHEREAS, nn the, 27th day of February, 1385, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. PION, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: '� T .1y q EC ION 1: That the fallowing findings can be matt. i 1. That the proposed use is in iccord with the General r Plan, the objectives of the Develo at Code, and tFe purposes of the district in which the site is located. ' 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions ap,,elicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the I public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicabie,provisions of the Development; Code. SECTION 2• "That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -42 is approved subject to the'tollowing conditions: I.. This Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission after a 2 -year period. 2. Large 4roup meetings may ocvur only on weekends and after 5 :00 p.m. an weeknights. 3. No institutional activities will be permitted which exceed the available parking or cause adverse effects upon surrounding businesses. Should any problems arise, this Conditional Use Permit shall be brought back to the Commission for reconsideration;,, py k 'sM17 C L CUP #,4°4.2 page � ,F 4. Public aesembly or-other large group meetings shall `z not occur uhhtV?. such time as all Unifom Building Code and Title 19 of the State, Fire Marshall's Regulations have bit complied with. S. An future ansion or intensification of the use shall regirea modification of this Conditional Use Permit. APPROVED AM. ADOPTED IVS 27th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1M. E PLANK C SSI011 OF CITY OF RAti M CUCJWXGA 4 BY: i18[!Ih S a racach ` oepu y Secretary I, Ri Gmm. Deputy Secretary of the Planning Coaaaission of the 11, it *d f an Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby carti'fy that the foh�egoing Rv,- 7Iution was duly, regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plannithq Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a re- lar meeting of the Planting Commission held on the 27t ft day of February, 1985'*, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS CNITIEA, BARKER..MCNIEL, ROWEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BONE ABSENT: COMM' NONE I r CITY OF RANCHO CUCA IlONGA (LyCAA& STAFF REPORT � a G DATE: Febiairy 25, 1987 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -03 -- CHRISTIAN FAMILY FrLLONSHIP two year review for compliance with e approve conditions of oproval of an established 1,650 square foot church within "a 6,604 square foot multi- tenant irdustrial building in the General Industrial Area (Subarea 4) located an the south side of 6th Street east of Archibald Avenue - APN 210- 471 -47, 48, 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIOKs A. Action Requested: Two-year review of an established church. B. Purpose: To ascertain compliance w °th the conditions of approval. C. Su"ounding Lan-, Use and Zoning_ North Fii- tenant in usd rir al; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 4) South - Multi- tenant industrial; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 4) East - Warehousing; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 4) West - Multi - tenant industrial. Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 4) D. General Plan Designations: Froje z bite - "GeneralLndustrial North - General Industrial South General Industrial East - General Industrial West General Industrial E. Site Characteristics; The church is within the multi- tenant industrial u ng i n the Archicenter. The project consists of eight (8) multi- tenant buildings. `The entire site's parking capacity is approximately 175 cars. At this time the canter is not fully leased. ITEM I ME PLANNING COWISS ON STAFF REPORT CTJP 85 -03 - CHRTSTIAN FAMILY FELLOWSHIP February 25, 1987 . Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. Gensral• Staff has reviewed the church,, operation for c*Tiance with the Conditions of Approval. An "informal survey, was also taken of surrounding tenants. All of the tenants surveyed agreed that the church did not have any major negative impacts on the busirmsses. However,. some 'Felt that on the week -ends it was a traffic hazard to place a portable sign at the driveways on Archibald. Further, one business requested that parking spaces at their front door be left open for their use since they also operate on the week: -ends. As a matter of Code Enforcement, t`.#1 City has been in touch with the church regarding. their illegal portable sign. As of the time of this staff report the issue has not been re`olved to the satisfaction of Code Enforcement. During the past two-year period, the Christian Family Fellow -hip has expanded its square footage to include the adjacent lease space to the east which was the Moose lodge. This increased the square footage of the - dhurch to twine the approved size. In addition, a second church, the Orangewood Baptist, has occupied the space west of the Christian Family Fellowship. Sotto of these churches sharp a conwon sanctuary. The Orangewood Baptist Church has neither a business license for a non - profit organization nor an approved Conditional Use rermit. Code Enforcement has been, in touch with Christian Family Fellowship and Orangewood Baptist requesting that both churches get the appropriate approvals for operation. The applicant has stated that they will be roving from this location by July, III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The church is not in conformance with the ur g na on lri"pas of Approval regarding signs, and size and location of church.. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing in The Daily—Report newspaper, the property posted, and ;,Notices were sent. o propert& owners within 300 feet of the project site. The applicant has been contacted and is aware of staff's findings. V. RECOMMENDATION, Staff recoamends that the Planning Cond ssien direct e applicant to submit an application for a modification to their Conditional Use Permit within 30 days. 11 T_Z F _ F 4 CITY oh RANCHO T,rCLr Q,— Y16 1�" PLANNING DIVISIaN i a k Wl 1� rdacwf " aaASgt 1 4V man 4 CITY oh RANCHO T,rCLr Q,— Y16 1�" PLANNING DIVISIaN )'fit ; , • . _ •E :�. � �$r ' ' � i;-f{�;^• '� _ •�.: �'. r -� - k l�tit4Nfl�f • C�tJ�sr� ,. IT 6 N'onH CITY OF ITEIN b PLANNING DIvLsn t EYH!MT- .,._ _a" RESOLUTION N0. 85 -35 ' A RESCLUTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE i'ERMIT NO. 85 -03 FOR OF A CHURCH LOCATED 9375 ARCHIBALD AVENUE, #503, IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 4 , WHERFAS, on the 30th day of January, 1985,:a complete application was fifes by Forrest Hindly for review of the above - described project; and a WHEREAS, on the 13th- day of March,. 1985, the Rancho Cm amonga Planning - Comission old a public hearing to'consider the above - described E project. ?`HOEFORE, . the Rancho Cucamonga Planning CeWission, resolves as follows; SECTIL,. That the -Following findings can be matt J' 1. That the proposed use is 'in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district is, which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to.thp public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the propgs.ed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial ,apecific Plan, SECTION 2: Than Conditional Use Permit No. 85 -03 'is approved subject tc the fo login,�,t conditions: 1. This use shall be permitted at this location for three (3) from years the date of approval. Further, the operat' q of this .Sond tionat Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning CammissiM in two years. 2. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if the approved use has not commenced within twenty' -four (24) months from the date of approval. i i 1 r Resolution No. CUP 85 -03 1tr Page r G 0 3. The sf -t< shall be developed in accordance with ,the approved site plans ' on file in the PlaC; ng Oivision4 the ~ -cond=tions -contained herein,, -and Industrial Area Specific .Plan regulations Prior to any use of the project site or business activlty:i� rY being eommenccd thereon, all conditians'. of approval shall he completed to the satisfaction of� the City(` Planner. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive''compliance with all sections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, all other applicable Cit *.y' Ordinances, and ; applicable community plans or 'specific plans in effect at the time of occupancy. S. Any signs proposed for this Conditionai' Use Permit shall be desi4ned in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require, rev%a and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 6. If the operation of this church causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for their consideration and possible termination of such.ose. 7. Public 'assi.mbly or large group meetings shall not commence uktil such time as all Uniform Building Code and Title 19 of the State Fire Marshall's Regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 8. The building may be used for religious assembly and group meetings only during the weekend and after j 6:00 p.m. on weeknights. 9. Preschools or schools are not allowed by this permit; however, this shall not ,preclude nurseries or Sunday School. - T -9 -7� 'Resolution No. 85 '30 CUP 85-03 Pags 3 APPROVED AND,f �PTEDJHIS 13th DAY OF MARCH, 1986. PLARN ISSION OF T.sE CITY OF RAN CHO CUCAMONGA BY- ennis t airman ATTEST: ic G ty-re—cretary 'ic 'Omez. Deputy Secre, tary of the Planning Commissim of the City of 0 Rancho, Cucamonga$ do hare4-y icertify that the foregoing Resolution was d ly and r and adopted by the Planning Commission of the ggula ly introduced, passed, Congission held ity o Ranc�q Cucamonga, at a regular meetit,6g of thq Planning on the 13th day of March, 1985 by the fullowing vote-�ito-wk t " AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, REMPEL, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COWSSIONERS: AONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE l;F1X ll�'' �iAlvctlti LUC;QMI,�NUA CtICAMO ' STAFF REPORT zc a w , O t G DATE: February 25, 1987 1977 TO: Chairmanj�and Members of the Planning Commi_sion FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Assistant Pla i1lr SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMCNT AND,?tONDITIOH& USE PERMIT 87 -02 -INC-- - A re lest o conduct re sa es o furniture n con unctionvth light wholesale, storage rnd distribution within an existing industrial facility, in General Industrial District :(Subarea 14) located at 12215 4th Street - APN 2?$- 331 -13. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action -', Requested: Approval of Conditional Use = Permit and Issuance o a gative Declaration. B. Applicable Regulations: The Industrial Specific Plan permits retal I sales from the premises in conjunction with light wholesale storage and distribution activities when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin North - acan a0 (proposed industrial facility); Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 14) South Vacant land; County of San Bernardino East Vacant land; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 14) West Vacant land (proposed truck rental facility); Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 14) D. General Plan Designations., Pro ec Site — Ge Hera n ustrial North General Industrial South County of San Bernardino East - General Industrial West - 'General Industrial E. Site Characteristics: The site is that of a recently completed rail serve n ustr a facility (see Exhibit 080), ITEM J PL ON��£4Yld 1 STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -02 - PlirMUSC February 25, 1387 Pag II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The site is comprised of three balldings, the largest u ng (C) is leased by two companies, K -Mars and Schollsl MA are distribution uses. The remaining two buildings will be leased by Pilgrim House; Building A; will be'their warehouse and Building 8 their showroom. The retail sales activities -` would be occurring from Building B. The applicant has Indicated that approximately 20% of their total business has been retail and the remaining business is wholesale. Availability of parking is a key ;issue in allowing retail activity in -the General Industrial area. Buildings A and B combined have 86 parking spaces which is primarily located along Santa Anita Avenue. The fallowing breakdown describes the parking demand necessitated by P11904m House. Number of Type of Use, ar'e a Ratio Parking Spaces Office 2,500 1/250 10 Warehouse 21,700 1/11000 21 a Showroom 16_1 1/307 55 „. Total 41,100, 86 This indicates that the showroom is basically a warehouse of furniture en display, parking is available for the showroom at a rate of 1 space for every 307 square feet of showroom area, which is well in excess of the 1 to 1,000 necessary for warehouse only. 'Therefore, 55 parking spaces would be available for the retat': "use, B. Environmental Assessment: upon review of Part I of the Initial SMY and ca�i/e on of art Ir of the Environmental Checklist, has staff four d no significant impacts related to retail sales in conjunction with wholesale activities at this location. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is consistent with the Industrial pec r c Plan. The proposed use, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, will not be detrimental to the public health, or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. PLANNING CQMMIBS`'0M St REPORT CUP 87-02 W PILGRI-N MUSl February, 25, 1987 Page IV. CQRRESP2 ,E; 5his item has -been advertised 'as a Public aar.ng {n iI �,Re ort newsipaper, the property posted, and notices s�e� ers withi:t a 300 foot radius of the r Project site, a U - Pe-- 1fIAaT�OtiR Staff recosaiends approval of the Conditional se eras n ssnance of a Negative Declaration. Res tfully tad: 7. Bu er ` City Planner S 88:DM ns I Attachments: Application ` Exhibit "A" _ Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan k Resolution of Approval with Conditions I i ,i 'i � �3 m z a. LLI 0 ._1 Lu Lit z 0 LL Q z ul IL LLj a r i " M PART I Uniformg Application �. APN FILE NO. GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED ^ X3°7- �-aG.i NAME F PROPOSED PROJE RE p FIRES / � LOCATION OWPf1OJECT(A S) ff 9 G Ga . 41—:71-1 i � C6z��t ;6 x.z IS- 411, �� 1 APPLICANTS NAME % TELEPHONE DIOR $S t / n r .t-rtJ tJyl....f OWNER'-$ t..N E P TECf PHONE �r ADDRESS r REVIEW REQUESTI D ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PEVAAVIIT* ❑ TECHNICAUDESIGN REVIEW -- C' ONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL' jx j NON CONSTRUCTION' 0 TECH NICAUDESIGN REVIeN — • DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT RESIDENTIAL* (ZONE CHANGE) ❑ TOTAL DEVELOPIV,'NT • GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 BASIC STANDARDS Q OPTIONAL STANDARDS • MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ❑ CUSTOM LOTSUBDIVISI3N ❑ MINOR EXCEPTION ❑ DESIGN REVIEW (REAPPI :CATION) ❑ PRELIMINARY REVIEW O VARIANCE 13 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ q *It !s manslato to complete Part I & 11 of the Uniform Application PROJECT DESCRIPTION y: FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (ATTACK AD _ ,AL SHEE`TS IF NECESSARY) f �J.fi,L.... hsi� J} ri w� . � iA.?-•tt c�yt'..t..4�tri...�,t ti.'- LL'= 'i��,�f�_Ly�t�l,• fir.. >x. r^ • y��..� G�ia / i� �/ r�bi��(Lsd�.�'.'L'YiClctsL � OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY, FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THAk ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. AGENT OF OWNER MUST ATTACH A LETTER O AUTHORIZATION FROM THE LEGAL OWNER. DATE--/- SIGNATURE: / 1 <'•� •` �• +-�-7�. -.z �... PRINT NAME & TITLE: DATERECD REC�EIV-ED@T FFO# FEES RECEIVED - - RECEIPTNO. V 3c�r%Pxl fir" > S` `-/0 5 -1'7 > J Fs ,'ftiiE s;g1��t a s ' JUM s sl I Zo -• ° Jc! —mg-0209M _. NORTH CITY OF, PLANNING DRI SON E.XHIMT- -&—SC1LE -ems J- , I '4 RESOLUTION NO. '> A RESOLUTItN! OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING C"ISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87 -0 FOR RETM SALES OF FURNITURE IN CONJUNCTION WITH VGHT WHOLESALE, STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION LOCATED AT 1221a'4TH STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the -nth day of January, 1987, a compiete application was filed by Pilgrim !louse, Inc. for review of the above - described project, and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of February, 1987 the Rancho Cucaimonja Planning Commission held a publico hearing to consider the above- described project. NOW, i'HEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: ?hat the following findin can be net: 1. That the proposed use is in aecap:iwith the General Plap, the objectives of the Develboi6at Code, and i the purposes of the district i:► which the site is located. t' 2. That the proposed use. tog thCr with the conditions applicable thereto, will not tx detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. , , - -L 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen a-n a•t a Negative Declaration is issued on February 25, 1987. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -02 is approved subject to e o owing conditions: PLANNING tiIVISION 1. Approval shall expire unless extended by the Planning Commission, if the approved use has not commenced within twenty =four months from the date of approval. 2. Any expansion of office space shall be reviewed and approved by the City, Planner to ensure the continued, availability of adequate parking on site. :r' CUP 87 -02 - PILGR'IM HOUSE February 25, 1987 Page 2 Aftk 3. Any signs °proposed for this Conditional Nse Pene she;?! br designed in conformance with the compresnsiv- Sign Ordinance and shah require review and apprc ".__ .y the Planning Division prior to in.ttallation of such signs. 4. If the retail sales Activity causes adverse effects -upon adjacent b4sinasses_, or operations, tree 'Conditional Use Permit shall be bvaught before the planning Commission for ` their review and consideration of Possible revocation of such use. f S. Approval of this request shall' -not eaai've compliance with all sections of the Industrial Specific Plan, and all other applicable City Ordinances 1h effect at the time of occupancy. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity � being caaenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed to the satisfaction-of the City Planner. 7. My tenant improvements shall receive appropriate permits from the Building and Safety Division. 8. Retail sales s?.ail be limited to 20% of total business activity. APPR01'ED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF FFRRUARY, 1987. PLANNING CCIMM4ISSIO OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: av Ba r er, a rman - ATTEST: Bra er, pa re Dry Is C =ad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution eras duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the planning Coaon was n Ei' the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at -a regular meeting of tba Pi?ining Commission held on the 25th day of February, 1987, by the following Bate -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: A.9SENT: COMMISSIONERS: to l T 9 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA )?T "F RF.PORT t r' RATE: February 25, 1987 ' X977 TO: Cfa;rman and Members of the PlarjW',fg Commission FROM,.:,, Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PER'MI'T 85 -12 MODIFFCATION - JEHOVAH'S WITNESS - A requisit —'fo' M6 IfY a cqAdIt Ion o approva requi -V ng the andergrounding of existing overhead �ztii ties along Church Street for a proposed 0urc4, on the north side. of Church Street east of Archibald Avenue - APt 1077- 321 -04. I. BACKGROUND:'the pro=ject was "approved by the Planning Commission on August M,986, subject to a coadi.tion to underground the existing overhead utilities along Church Street fronting the pro,;ect, While making arrangements to Clete the undergrounding, the applica,t was informed that,the work would be considerabley more expensive than originally estimated. Therefore, he is requesting that he be alioweO to pay anjjI in -lieu fee -instead of undergrounding. His request letter is 0,ttached as Exibit :,'Q#. The relationship of the utilities to the site are shown on Exi6it "C". II. ANALYSIS: There are two gene°al factors that have contributed to the actin cyst exceeding the earl ief estimates: 1. Edison I's requiring" "(for good reason),-.that a longer length of undergrounding be accomplished (1351' versus 250' for the earlier estimate). 2. A provision of the new tax -eform law has "_. °:.ed Edison to charge Developers an additional 86% for all Edison related facilities {an increase from $100 to $186 per foot in this case). The initial cost estimate was $40,000, which the applicant budgeted and felt he could afford. The latest estimate considering the longer length and higher cost, is $106,000. If he were allowed to pay the standaard one -half in -lieu, fee, his cost would be about $40,000 ($22,000 as an in -lieu fee and $18,000 to relocate some existing poles to behind the proposed curb). In addition, undergrounding is complicated by services to neighboring residences and the possible extensive relocation of an additional pole so that a guy wire wille outside the new north /south street adjacent to the east, bo ndary of t''-_ development. J, ITEK K } TO: Chairft' a°a a idrs -of the Planning Commission SUBJECT. CUP $a Modification Jehovah's Witness � R DATE: February ' , 1987 PAGE 2 f Staff originally required undergrounding for the following reasops:(r Aft ' pia L Some,.of the poles had to be moved to outsidf. 'the roadway at an additional cost °rich could bp,, wasted in farms of the long :r range goal. of undergrounding. e. The utility lines terminate dust to the west of the project; therefore, the 300 feet or Tess exemption did not strictly appTy.` I' 3. It appeared that this would be the best., opportunity to actually accomplish the undeegrounding. r/t It is also noted that the property on the 'opposite (south) side of Church :Street is vacant-, therefore, reimbursement of one -half the cost of undergrovidiog to �bssf'ble upon its dedzlopment. . This would reduce the..ost to this develper to $53,000; however, he would have to initial y !apfront these funds. III„ REC8NB4i'c DATI0H: Base %i u0ort the - complexity; of aCCOmp shingl' ne urn ergroun ng and the large unexpected cost, staff recor nds�hat the Commission grant' t1ta applicant's request for the modification.'- A Resolution to this effect corgi dining an in -lieu fee payment condition has been Oovided. Respectfully submitted, r Barn R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer s - SRH :jh Attachments: Location Map (Exhibit W.) Request �ettar (Exhibit "B ") Utility Locations (Exhibit "C ") Resolution le 1 PROILCIT LoeXTION crry OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGDMMMG DIMON rr I K. S. LEI. NG, STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, INC. easo MCMIMe "IL suiTa, I.- RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA Y17ao 9 7144984.2740 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning and Engineering Department 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 January 30 1987 Dear Sirs: This letter is to outline a serious problem that we have encountered =n connection with the proposed Kingdom Nall of Oehovah's Witnesses at 9747 Church Street, Rancho, Cucalonga. On August 27, 1986 we received a Conditional Use Pevmit•#95 -12 to construct a Kingdom Nall. During our Technical Review it was discussed that the overhead Utilities would be placed underground as a condition of development and that we fully €mporve the alley to the west of the property and that we construct one half of Street A to raft feet over centerline on the east. We were also required tR widen Church Street on the frontage of our property. In addition, . we were required to master plan the surrounding property to illustrate the potential development surrounding our proposed building. The Cucamonga Water District Is requiring that In addition to this that we install an eight inch waterline up the new street for a distance of about 230 fe including cutting CM.urch Street and pick up their existing neater main on the south side of Church Street. This, too, is vary expensive. We have tried to be very cooperative. We thank and camrend the planning staff for their help and direction on the architectural statement. Although we redesigned our building about 8 times, we are pleased with the final design and we are anxious to begin construction. We have no difficulty In complying with the street widening, street lights, fire hydrants, the curb Gutter and sidewalk, the construction of the new sheet, the 250 feet of 8 inch water line for the people behind our property or even the improvement and paving of the alley we cannot use because of the fire department. However now we have a problem that we request your yelp with for it presents an obstical we cannot overcame and may very well kill our pro$ect. When we first investigated the cost of undergrounding the utilities we talked to the City, So. Cal. Edison, GTE., and electrical contractor aitd several general contractors. No one would give us an exact figure for the cost:? we would incar. So. Cal. Edison told us that they would not give us any Quote until we submitted to then our grading and street improvement plans and it would then take 10 to 12 weeks from then. GTE told us that they would not give tcs their figure until we submitted a "work order ". The "ball park" figure that was given us was approyimately $100.00 a running foot. We figured that would amount to $22,800.00 because our frontage on Church St. is 228 Feet. Because of the uncertainty of the "ball park" figure we budgeted $40,000.00 for the undergrounding. We were also assured that } of the $22800400 could be recouped from the person who developed th property across the street. On this premise we secured funding. 1,�--A1 EMBM. page z Last -7htjrsdny January 22,1987 the lightning bolt st kl @tll I met.with Wke'Bear4 Customer Service Planner.lor Sothern California Edison on. our property. He lookr*4 at our project and tolw ;eke that to underground we would need to move the exis �q pole east of our propetty.approx 30 feet because they would have to lQtaiiguy wires on that pole since it then would be the end QP'the line and the guy wires would extend into the.otreet arse have to construct. lie then said we would have to underormo d from that pole past car property, past the Mouse next datir and o the next le west or oir property, around„he corns to a vault located. on Archibald Street a g and total of 436 feet. Then he told us that the, going rate for underilrounding had just gone up that mom ng to $1$6.00 a running foot. or $81,098.010. WFtT A 5Fftilll A visit was make with !Marty Reid an engineer i~c ^r GTE who is working on tea. our project. Ne told me that not the telephone costs for going underground that far would be about $25;000.00: Now we are at a grand total of 106,096, We only paid $65;400.00 fon the whole propertylltll AQ I' I'think by now you can see Our problem. We are a nonprofit religious or p gi ganization.. All of our building, engineering plans, architectural ,,fans, and all the labor to build opar building is by volunteer labor. We are'not_ Wealthy. We have no tithing. All Eur moniy comes from voluntary contelbutions with no coer3Lon. We can not afford this exorbident charge for undergrdunding and appeal to the City of Ranch Cucamonga for relle4j.from this burden. Mike Beard SCE. has .-assured me that to move the poles rather than go underground x will cost less than $$,004.00. Marty Reid GTE. has assured me`that the telephone costs to move the poles would be about $10,000.00. Allan Beech BCA Cablevision has estimated our ,Cost if we move the poles at $275.00 This alternative of just moving the poles represents a cost to us of $18,275.00' The difference between undergrourc(ing for 106,096.00 and moving the poles for $18,275.00 is an amazing $87,821.00. Please do not misinterpret our plea. We do want to cooperate. Ne agree-that undergrouding of the utilities would beautify the City v 1 our Kingdom Hall. However at that price it is tmpossible for us to Comply. "We wish to construct a beautiful building which will to a credit to the neighborhood and to the comity as a whole. Please give attention to our plea, our whole congregation is praying that your hearts will be moved to allow us this one concession. Your t 1�, FI David R. Ouncombe (Presiding Minister) Chairman Building Committee a i vt .ee ry 10014ys f► r iz 44 C ` [ - AZ� N141W 041 ITALM t 'y E RESOLUTIO NO. A RlSOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMIT$SION APPROVING A MODIFICATIOk OF A CONDITION OF A�AOVAL FOR fONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85 -12 FOR THE /HURCH OF JEHOYAH:S WITNESS LO�ATED ON THE NORTH SID, , OF Cnt3KCH STREET, EAST OF AS{WBALD AVENUE -APN: 1011- 321 -04 WHEREASon the 30th day of January, 1987, a request for a modification of conditions was filed by Mr. David R. Duncombe fore'the above stated project. WHEREAS, an the 25th day of February, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described condition mondification. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolves as follows: SECTION 1: That Condition 1 under Engineering Nv_T_sT5n5T Resolution No 86 -130 shall be replaced with the following: ft in-lieu fee as contribution to the future und+rprounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Church Street shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length .5rom the center of the alley on the west to the center of the new street on the east. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. Davia Barker, airman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of February, 1587, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS:. NOES :_ COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:% NJ" TO: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF "REPORT i February 25, 1987 Chairman and Vembers of the Planning Coneiission Brad Buller, City Planner Bruce Cook, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESa"MW AND TRACT 13057 CMIFICATION) THE FIELDS M-WE COMPAXT---W-dT ic8 on to con di tfons o approva per -fin, wrought I= fencing adjacent to deer Creek Channel for Tract 13057, an approved residential subdivision of 4._55 acres within the Victoria Planned. Commuaity (Low -Medt* Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) into 147 lots, located at the southeast corner of Highland Avenue and Beer Creeir - APH 202- 211 -13, 38. I. ABSTRACT The Fieldstone Company is requesting a modification to the Conditions of Approval for Tract 13057 to permit open - style, wroght iron fencing adjacent to the Deer Creek Channel. II. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13057 was approved by the Planning Commission at their meeting of May 14, 1985. A Condition of, Approval of the Resolution was that a six foot high block wall be, constructed along the westerly tract perimeter to screen views of the adjacent Deer Creek Channel. The Fieldstone Company, the project developer, has. submitted a letter requesting r. modification to this condition to permit, instead, an open - style, wrought iron fence. III. ANALYSIS: Tract 13037 is one of five tracts located within Victoria Groves Village.. Three of these tracts, i.e. 13067, 13058, 13059, have their westerly tract perimeters abutting the Deer Creek Channel'. For all three tracts, the same condition requiring the block wall adjuzent to the Deer Creek Channel has been applied. Staff has two primary concerns as to this request to modify the block wall to a wrought iron fencing along the westerly tract perimeter of Tract 13057. These concerns are follows: 1TEM L t�4AN1rIt i' fl SwIil1# a AFF REPOIRt TM X'3Cn's7 - UE FIELDSTONE CO. b Py 25; 1981 Page k 1. The wall proposed for the other two trA is adjacent to the Beer Creek Channel,, i.e. 'Tracts 13058 and � 13059, would remain as a block wall. To provide the open, -style wrought„ irons fencing adjacent to Tract 13051 would theii. resu'%� in an inconsistent fencing `.. program along this portion of Victoria's' perimeter. !4 o nued goal of the planned communities has % ays been to maintain a consistency of design. 2. The applicant has indicated the treason for this request is to enhapee view orientations of the mountains. Staff has some reservations in regards to this, rational. Staff believes that any benefits {. derived from the wrcught Iron fete in relation to enhance view oridntation of the mtountains would be } more than outw0i�hed by negative impact resulting from direct views into the Beer Creek Channel, The purpose of requiring, the block wail along the westerly tract perimeter was tc screen the flood' control channel. Staff does not believe that direct , open views into the flood control channel either from public streets or from private property would be a desirable situation. i i IV. PU6LIC NOTICING This project has been advertised as a public Hearfag in She Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices senT1-5 a�i" property r owners within 306 et of the project site. To date, no input has been received in regards to this project. Y. FACTS FOR FINDINGS. The Planning Commissioii should consider all material input in regards to this smatter. If the Commission concurs with the facts for findings as indicated, then adoption of the attached Resoluticn would be appropriate. EPORT Pt AtN d TRACT 13007 , d6ST t.# i§ltiRtZs CO. February 25, 1587 Fade 3 a a' VI. RECO�iTItIN. 1 r ` Staff recommends ,that the Planning commission this req!.� t for modificatfta for the reasons Mated. P' ulI i; ftt 4Retf leanner BB:BC:te Attachments: Exhibit "Ad — Victoria Groves Extkibit °R" — Tract 13057 Resolution go. 86-55 i E F 4 r _ f r I TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 43057 C[rY OF RANCHO CUCAMON" DECEMBER to,. t985 SITE UTILIZATION MAP VlO'lrI THoE sWreA,c,, uLYON CCvPAhY INC. m Loam Ff' TENT! 77YE TRACT ++-- . —_..tt BOii �A�iY SW PERM6TER. ZINE lvr f^MORfE CONSULTtNC CROVt 0 Ci'-P'Y CF RA NCI-10 GLTcAM4i` G TrrLE: ,° 5p PLANING DE WON E;YHIf3iT= 5CALE =�,.,_,_,r„_ Jrtoxaxaam � ��Naa2 €nrci'n+t��.:, '� ANVr1C�A °wvt'I�fMc _" 3 57 41 can t aarsw � �v:�' III fill, I z (:. all lit ^_ �. : va+ ew.e'.►.MVr.a.rrrr..or"s�w�s`�� i t i ,,,''� � � ` �w:. �: d a CM0 t 4 u+ r �z Tit y`° fa r ti� f 6 :.s RESOLUTION NO. 86 -SS A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING Caj1ISSjOg OF THE CITY OF . ; HO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CZhDiTIONALLY APSROKING2 OENTATWE TRr.--I MAP NO. 13057 The idillia�rER � T�htative Tract Maw No. 130 lereinafter "Map" submitted by ' i,yors Comepanyt SpPAtc? , -} for the purpose of subdividing the real ^ >, property situated In t!t City oVarafnzho CucA_ ga, County of San 9ernarJino, State of .California, discribed as 22.55 acres within the Yintoria Planned Community (Loge- Medfum� Rcs 4ntfal, 4 8, dwelling u4-u per acre), loeateki ct the sou ast corner, f�iighland Avehue and the Dear Creek Channel (APN: 2Q2- 211 -13, 38) int±?14��etts: regularly came b,,fore the pianning• Coy mission for' Public hearf%ti_ 1 action on May L'i iP96; and WHERF.e65, ti* City Planner- has recommended 4 0vsl of ;the MAO subject all conditions � "t forth in the EngineeringAnd Plannt�g Di,,rie�aie °s reports, and �. WHEREA& the Planoing Commission has 1 „dad and censidei_k —cam; Ertg:ceering and Planning Division`s reports ano has considered other evidence presented at !UW public heariewo. NOV, THEREFORE, tom. Planning Cmissioh of the City Of itav�ha I” Cuca�aonga does resol:xc as follows: SECTIOM 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regivd' tOMRIEVe Tract 96. 13057 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is co "istent w+th the General Phan, Bevel opmeht Code, and specific plans; b) The design or inproveftnts;1f the tentative tract is consistent with the General'Plan, Development Code, ' and specific plans,; (c) The site is— Physically suitable for the type of y developmen"roposed; (d) The design of the subdivision 43 not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and .voidable injury to humans and wild:ife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public heitilth problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not colfiict with any easement acquire,,` by the :public at large, now of record, for acrtsy through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 1 4- `77' PLUMING 00"ISS1" 7, RESOLUTION May 14, 1495 TT 1305+. - 'i'ha William Lyon Co. Page 7. &,six foot high masonry wall shall be provided along MmhImid' Avenue consistent with the approved wall des:�v;, Ior Highland Avenue. This r►�ll, shall be staggered and oiFfeet to increase y' ts► interest and j shalt be s;6dck a mi►limum 6 fod� distance behind the itighlastd Avenue right -of -way beyond the ral TrOs li ita of jarisdictfon to ensue% ad�Quate area to 'lan+iscape the Highland Avenue rr�f: *etscape with a windmv style of planting consistent with the } y da3ignata dssigtix standards of the 'Victoria Planned Community' LaAo,€caPs maintenance easements will be j required-, Rire `o�sa pert ter wail encroachew ,on= private I ts,and are to be dedicated. on the rinal Map. Finlri plotti.� of all walls and locations of all lands!;ape masemHNlts are to be determinwi prior to recor'.'altion of than Final Map. 8. Fi * ";Q snot high 'ecorative fences will be re4uirea along street side-lot lines for all lots that either' side -on or rear of to Victaka Gravers Loop Road. in rear -on conditlons wa ts,vill be of masonry block construction. `'in sit, <iations where street.' grade is below pad grader resulting in a sloped parkway, fence lines ar4 to be coinei'limt k*1th the top of sl-tPe. Landscape maintente�:re e4emerN;s +ill be , required where fences encroachont ;;o vate lots and are to be dedicate4r, on the Final ;Flap. Ficeal platting of all fences and locations of all esseaew are to be deteralkd prior to recordatikla of the Final Map. 9. Any retaining waits used, other th,4) these at the tract iarimeter adjacent: to the Beer Creek channel, are to be a maximuri. of 4' high.. A six fo`at high masonry screeA wall thall be p*b trsd along the westerly tract perimeter• adjacen; �, to the Deer Creek Channel. 10. All retaining Walls visiblf to the general public, i.e. on the streetnir. :.; corner side yards and within the front yf'-a are to be constructed of a decorative material-to the satisfaction a,F the City Planner. 11, All lot -to -lot grade differentials are to be rra gr:aUr than 12`, excepting this condition shadi not apPly to the slope from Highland dawn to the Orst tier of lots adjacent to Highland. Engineering Division I. Victoria Groves Loop Road shall be constructed E, fail width to Highland Avenue with the fiat phase of ' development. Sidewalks and parkway landscaping may be deferred until adjacent parcels. are developed. • s u,� roan ;. ATTESTa 1 Brad SuIlPer, e- ecre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretairy of the 'Planning Cowissi .In of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregvsn4,Resolution AS duly and • regularly introduced, passed, and, adopted by the P';;:nning Coasaission of the City of Ranchot "Cucamonga, at a regular sheeting Gt the' Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May, .',986, by the folkwing vote -to -wit: AYES. COMMONERS: CHYTIEA, REMPEI , 8A1L"ERD SrWT NOES: COWISSJQMERS: HOME ASSENT: COMISSIONERS: KNIEt. ,r 4 �, PLAR ii% CO PST " RESOLUTION f. M May 14, 1585` 1 1 q TT 1305? - The Wil I fan Lyon 4o. Page 5 - .5. The sea drain master plan fcr the area s6,all;-,,be cmoleted and approvzd prior to r�ecordatv�f! of the Final -��r 6. Cl *-^uct sufficient storar drain facilities to'sArve, ev& phase (of deyelopment as required by the City. E gins r. The facilities shall be designed to Contain 0100 W'1'thin the street. or easement, right -of -way. �. ) )�PRDYED AND PWI'ED' INIS 1 14pt DAY "oF MAY, ' c P PLANN MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCK %OCAI O BY: CITY OF MNCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT � �= _. z DATE: U a F4ruary 25, 1987 tsrr TO; Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission -i FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner t� BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE,JNEHT AND CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT S6 -30 ' - BROWN LEARY - e eie opment of a ou bed acute psychiatric hospi- cal, approximately 53,000 square foot of flogr area, on 6.12 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Red Oak F Street - APH 208- 351 -42 ` 1. PROJECT AND DESCRIPTION: A, Action Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a —psyc W- 6e, atric hospital; approval of Site Plan and Elevations; and issuance of a Negative Declaration.. B. Surrounding land Use and Zonin L Nort - scant; Industrial Park District Subarea 7 South - Vacant, with approved 51.4 acres Industrial Master Plan; General Industrial District Subarea 8 ` East - Vacant; Industrial Park District Subarea 7 West - Existing industrial condominiums; Industrial Park District Subarea 7 C. 'General Plan Designations: D- Project to Indugsr t Park Nor'.'a - Industrial Park Scuth - General Industrial East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park D. Site Charac eristics: The site is vacant with no significant Ih vegetation. Rrrow Highway, Red Oak Street, and Civic Center Drive are fully improved except for driveway approach. The project site consist of four (4) parcels of Parcel Map 9955, t that recently received approval from Ptdnning Commission. The developer is proposing to consolidate the four (4) parcels intoi one (1) lot for his project, leaning two (2) smaller parcels between the site and the future Post Office parcel, as shown in I Exhibit B. I i ITEM M _. � AE'PORT PLANNING COi+�1LS fIN S RFC 7 CUP 86.30 BROWN LEAR'€ February 25, 1987 Page 2 a t,• E. Parking Calculations: No. of Spaces . No. of Spaces Type of Parking Required Prod Raba -- _IMire ._--Ase --. "°' 140 _ Psychiatric 1.75 spaces 140 Hospital per bed psychiatric F. A licable R ulations: The proposed use, - Care e hosp to ireca GonditionalaUsadPermit withntei>2ustria��Par which requ the industrial Specific Plan. u.strict Subarea 7 of II. AN gLYS2s: The proposed development c0sists of a 8tb oed acute for adulis and A. General: psye ia.ric hospital with health ,care pro9r The' health care pm,gram� include tresnt for laveragee the adolescents. mental and' iemotional cdisorder, c c�� SUL) n 6a d -, while/,,, disorders, and hospital far ao; It patients approximately cent he Ith care, ! 90 daYs.• State to satisfy State of ad stay an average of treatments. include educational programs Attached for California requirements. and the o the facility =Also •r detailed descript; , ,; offered. PVchiatric Insti.,uV sumnarY of a market study. the executive atta:.hed is a ZZIpy o, the The proposed site planni`ng�wstatiement, th /'cacti et recreation project and building edesirian; pathway on -site meets _ open space, and the continuous p uidelines of the Industrial intent of the urban design g contains some elements If the extension Specific Plan. The proposed elevation style ofinel:alitroof r of post modern two :c. tore�geometric tales, etc. The most visible of walls and arcades, i scheme, arrangements of accent a:,e the building entry statement as shown architecture elements in the front elevation (Exhibit G). c B, Oesi n Review Committee, The Committee •(McNeil, (hitiea, 5 f 1987. }1t the on FebruarYtans some Ver rev ewe the project to address the developer provided revised p : meeting, of the Committee concerns in the following areas 1. Twenty additVinal parking spaces were added t9 the north east elevation. Revised landscape plans indicating an added density with the City f of landscape _material consistent requirements. El PLANNING COMISSTOk STAFF REPORT CUP 86 -30 BROWN LEARY February 25, 1983 Page 3 3. The revised eleva', oV,4 show added large square Obtiff and the grid pattern reveal, (11M attached F.xMbits do not shops the above motioned revisions, as the reductions of revised plans we not completed in the to 6e included in this report) The coomtittee reviewed these revised plans and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. The proposed stamped concrete texture pavement material should be changed to interlocking brick pavers, exposed aggregate or combination of them. 2. The continuous pedestrian pathway in front of the north elevation should be of such materials as exposed aggregate;, brick pavers or combination of these. 3. The block walls along south, west and north elevation should have additional architectural' elements such as brick capand /or reveal. 4. Light bollards should be added to the building entry area. 5 The Committee expressed concern that the design of the Porte cochere was "bland" And recommended that the applicant provide two alternatives for full Planning Commission di4cussionss 1). The original proposed design and' 2) a design with addition architectural elements. To date the applicant has not submitted the second alternative design. 6. The Committee was also concerned with this particular type of land use, as to the appropriate location for development of thi3 type of project, the related medical uses this typ6 of use would attract to the surrounding area, and the concentration of such J.�nd use in any one area. At the meeting a representative of Psychiatric Institutes of America (P. I. A.), Ms. Patrica Winning, stated that they have bought the Certificate of Heed from Continental Care. Continental Care, a similar type of facility was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission on October 23, 1985, which is in close proximity to the project site. She also stated that the related medical officer attracted by this type of use is minimal compare to a regular hospital. However, the Committee rec ended for full Planning Cowinission discussion on this; particular item, anti perha s' establishing sode-',4olic direction regarding this type of land use. JR'i - 'i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -30 BROWN LEARY February 25, 1387 Page 4 C. Enviromzentai Assessment; Staff has completed the environmental checklist and has determined that the development of this project is impacted by traffic noise along Arrow Highway. However, a noise study has been submitted to the City for review which determines that a stucco fence of 7 feet high and setback 45 feet from the curb would reduce the ttoise level to the acceptable level of 60 dba. Therefore, staff has determined that will,not be a significant impact in this case because the mitigation measure of requiring at stucco fence along Arrow Highway has been added to.the project and to she conditions of approval. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to approval on it on Use Permit 86 -30, facts to support the ;`ollowitig findings must be made: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan. 2. That the proposed use, building design, site plan together with the recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Specific Pian. 3. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a public hearing, property posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff rerommends that the Planning Commission conduct a pu tc hearing tai consider this proposed project.. Ii the Commission concurs with staff recommendation then approval of Condition Use Permit 86 -30 and issuance of a Negative Declaration will be in order. Res tfuTT�'s' it! Brad Buller City Planner f m- CUP 'STAFF REPORT ' 3S}`� CUPN 8 LsAR� .� February Page, 6B:NF:sgr Atta(',hwnts: Description Of the P. t. A. Facility and Programs Exft -. tive SUMry of Market Studj, for ;P. I. A. Facility Exhibit 'A' - Location Map Exitibifi "B" - Site UtiliZa�iion ,Map Exhoit 'C' Sate Plan Exhi,i , Casceptuai Urading Ply Jt 'rxhihi't RE- J" u ceptuakl' Landscape i= 7 *4n ambit " t�&w ans � Exhibit "1" Pdrtte cochere Design Resolutione9f`;±1pO'"nva'2 with Standard Conditions it /J �- 5 �{ i _ �. j x F.'�� - _ l { ��7; �f .'. ,.. .. - - � S. {. 1`,:. � � {'.... '�� I p \\ -_ � ��~ \\ i �'. _., _ _ fN., 4 F F �V"r° � `��6An PrY� � �. ' -; ... I`1 i.. �� 1 • - �1 �\ �� L 1 �,) �.. it .. -4A t i ( {� �� lr � Members AtA 1. Y1 `7 ig O , C AND PLAMNG r Ci Principals JamesA men pAC>vI,jLn b PROGRAMS C)o VWA Ember RobertRodnguez John Molsap }• e� Pry yp ledt.- yohiatric Hospital F (Oil Peter M. Park 2. :'rypo of ;Facilities Provided; $0 p.itient bids with 5ppparting davrooms, classroonsi therapy areass .administration, food service and gym. Associates: 3. Parking: 120 sp 'aegs,,00 required). `t Joseph A, Frazrer " raJmenSV.�uMer 4.. Daily Autratpbile Tries 180 to 200 totals = including l P wndaM.Moreland visitors. j KennethA. Seuber1,nq S. Empllyment Opportunities: psych�atrfstss psychologists# nurses, t��chers, itousekeepings and vaintenancea 6. Employees per 24 hour shift -. Days: so Swing Shift: s0 =2i Night: Total: 150 7. Treatment. (See fteket Analysis, for numbers of units,) 71 A. Adolescents will be treated i>r 30 to 60 dyas for a variety of mental tealth condit'tions includiR_ chemical dependency. B. Adults will be treated for 14 to 30 days for a variety of mental health conditions including chemical dependency. i{ Heroin a6ulction is not treated at Psychiatric } Institute of America facilities. C. One adult and one adolescence unit will be "locked" iisasscrrentadase; aced mean ng that the complete unit is locked at all Sole314 entrances. The individual patient rooms, activity San Oego, Caulcm,a%,2+ roomsc ate. are not lacked. (619i452.8544 755 8G88 Members AtA 1. Y1 `7 ig T T EWE . . . . . . . . . . . . ... Facility b Programs Jrrapals Page, g e �� >amesa try d A-8GwM *'OPa" units siitir paiap?s to j acne tftrau "g�aut�� men . do ZJnt3, qr. of thQ hosOUT to Ittiftsrooeis�, di'n4`eng%rooa, l JonnE U sap and gym. Hoviovsi'n no pati':onts are a lov d to /,' eav* the � graunc}s ,a�ttd .a'i'F oEEtdaor "a�ti.v tia3 a��'e� ciose,�1, ,✓ { E. The iaten a hey re ,went programts a,,ry to stabilize rA3socraa the, patient' 404 rerana thaw to 'a, pr;odu tivo lit 11s in the Ia5eph4;F�eaer cos*urrityr as soon as. possible This hospital, is a l Wan J. Fang toPm Care or custodial care: facility. Luku Lrr�da Moreiand — KennerA Seubark-g i '., it545Sorcn,�l;ueyP.oad Su to T4 SandegaQIA� ma 922i (6191452 -6541 *55 WAS Mtr^Guc -.l -- t t \l : i x .,� �.;. �,,� r�e� � ,r � , _,. :. �tj � • ,. ''��tl@@tl �' �� _ {� ` _ ry v1 Y 3�4 * '7.�� II /� . ' If �l_ ., ,..� (t.l .. ,r 1� `�•_� L 71� 1„ � �� '�, btu. � � i� � � k� �.. -` '' i'' �`l �� ,� , � �; _ �, �, 1` �,,. � ter'- �� ,. L. �� a 'z - __-. a �, _ � i` ,.. t �. �{ ti `� 3 NFt£ Specialty Hospital soup cber 20, 1986 PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXECUTIVE Stk*RY RANCHO COMM, CALIFORNIA o A new hospital development project. o 80 -bed psychiatric facility. o' Traditional stand alone - im PIA. o Growing market - 496,343 by 1991 - .42.7% growth from 2985 to 1495: o Bed need - 97 to 157 additional by 1991. �- 0 Psychiatrists - Support of five local psychiatrists and nini' psychologists. o Competition; _ ` Existing - 50 -bed Pavilion attached to San Antonio Hospital in Upland Pro osedr CPC in Fontana - 4 miles - steel town, lbw income - outside service area Charter in Redlands 25 miles - high income- outside service af4a o A CON has been granted for this project. 0 Option on land being negotiated - Not required :after 1!1!87 tier State of C.A -law change. s Total investment - 311,730,160. o Fleets HME Investmenz'Criteria. o Scheduled opening date - June, I988. (NME's rY 1989) 1; NK Specialty Hospital #roIV-1. Jber 20, 19 "SYCHIATRIC INSTITVTE OF RAWC"O C wNONGA jam aft -SEO PSYCH ATRIC WSPITAE RA" CIN MONGA, CALIFORNIA I ' 1. PROJECT DESCRiFTIDN The Ptychia rit Institute of Rancho CUCAftnsga (P. I. Rancho Cucamonga) is a new 80 -bed ps hfatrir hospital to be built in Rancho C, aaga, Salifornia. Adults and ;Wolescents will be served in this t=,p itll located itr southwest San 8Vnardina County. This is, a very high. growth, affluent area. ,CFA has ,9&n *rated support from six, psychiatrists and. nine psychologists. The projected average daily census based an these knawn referrat;NU it fel the fitist year of operation. PIA was ready to proud on this'�raject` several, months alt. but Baited for NM+E to. make its decision on whether to proceed with the Chafee Mq rr ai campus. Now that NME hai decided not to ursue that project, we Af,e proceeding with our project. t/ II « REC�SENflI1TIENe PIA proposes o construct and operate a $6,700 square font freestanding fa�ti l ity at a cast. of $1$6,621" pe:T bed. The total capital investmentAiatluding preopening costs) of $11,730,160 should be made because :of the`#sigh and growing population base. III. JUSTIFICAIOtt A. Servfce Area and demand for Beds 1. Service Area R;tncho Cucamonga's serOci area is 6dterp San. Bernardino County and Claremont in eastern Lo, Angeles Cs}u�ty. The service area generally corresponds td-, "CFA I7,t}7 and the northeast corner of HFPA 917. The citt.s or eo*unities comprising the service area are: tlntarfo, Uplanc'., Ranchi Cueaitvzga„ Montclair, )Vita Lama, Chino, Claremont, Mira Loma, Gast: -, and Evlwanda. See the map in Attachmert I for the location 6f cvc- wvnities within the service. area. The total' projected 1340 poput2:tion for the prismary, service area is 481,081. The population is projected to increase 23.7% between 1985 and 1990 and 16.3% between 1990 and 1;996. The 1941 total population is projected to 'be 495,343. A population sa=ary follows, rrd the breakout ty community is evallable in Attachment 2� (j- > R 2. In summary, Rancho Cucamrn_ga reprslentr:a growing market of substantial size. R, hospit in Rancho >,.-icmmt.)nga wi l i be - a good position to-serve a diso, inctive market area. Uemand He !L for 5 1a a. Awry _ of Demand/Need The only psychic -tric b30 in the service area, the F" bed psychiatric prP, attached to San Antonio Hospital in Upland, operates at 100% occupancy with awaiting list. kc,', 0 referral saurces pcadict a�a average census of 45 at o. Y,. R$ Cho Cucamonga N the first year„ To substantiate I the evvidence of demand from known referrals, a statistical � need methodo?rgX was applied to the servics area popt;t`atioa. It indicates A het need fur 97 to '157 beds, by 1991. PROTECTED P.JFU'ipFi _ R9NCH0 CiIC�u`�ONfl ,3t= �410E AREA _ %Change 9 Area 1985 1990 1 °85 -90 1991 '1395 99095 .._. ` Rancho Cucano a Service Area 389,032 481 081 ' f[ 15.3 _ , r, r 7.7 5.5 United Uate 4.6 ; 3.8 Source: Sauthern California Assbc�etiion of Governments (SCAri Aro3ectians by pooue.: zi ES'IINi.MD POPULATION' ay A&E WtHO WCANONGA SERYME AREA _ 'Age � .. + r J 1B 54 63 AllaA es Service Area r Populatiod 45,157 104.232 2985799 40,145 496,343 Percentage 8.1 ��. 21.0 60.2% - -9,71 1G0.0 Cal ifdrrir '' 7.6% 18.1% 62.35 11.79 104.015 AOL Source. 1990 County'age perce0zages developed by the Cuiiforaia Dep-rtment of FirAvice wer, applied to-the 1 -391 service area total population. (SCAG does not pro3ect zipcode 4c *uiation by age),, 2. In summary, Rancho Cucamrn_ga reprslentr:a growing market of substantial size. R, hospit in Rancho >,.-icmmt.)nga wi l i be - a good position to-serve a diso, inctive market area. Uemand He !L for 5 1a a. Awry _ of Demand/Need The only psychic -tric b30 in the service area, the F" bed psychiatric prP, attached to San Antonio Hospital in Upland, operates at 100% occupancy with awaiting list. kc,', 0 referral saurces pcadict a�a average census of 45 at o. Y,. R$ Cho Cucamonga N the first year„ To substantiate I the evvidence of demand from known referrals, a statistical � need methodo?rgX was applied to the servics area popt;t`atioa. It indicates A het need fur 97 to '157 beds, by 1991. b. tbit i atl ra of existin4 Fact itt , Ti;e i?irly psychiatric beds irrl the service area, at the SO-bed pavilio.} attached to San Antoni _ 4`t PIA re",gmends`4h, 80 -bed facility-comprised of 40 adult ds and 40 ti ,i adolescent psyc�iatric and substance abuse hedsY; r Programs Number of Beds !! Adu,t unlocked ":� 20 " z;�l Adolescent unlocked ?O )� Ada�escent substance abuse " � � 20 NPEb 20 ' T'otal a C, Competitt!jn $ Existing, � royi ?jrs wt-An the Service Area Within the primary service area,, the oply inpatient psychiatric si services are, pr,,vided in the 5504ed pavilion attached to the San: Antonio general; acute care hospital. Zurrently, this unit i =, running at IOOt pccwprncy with a waiting list. .Minima` programming•>is'provided, and the unit d6as not serve adolescents. b, 2. Development Activity within the iervice Area $, PIA has entpoed into to agre ment PLwOase 40 psychiatric � o beds that-isire being developed Continental ;n ciosLs "T,proximity 0 ti the Rancho Cucamonga )ocaOon. This will eliminate emy new corapetitive development i'� the P. ,l Unclso Cucamonga seruice " area. r 3, 02ye1epmenVActivity 6utside tb ervicln/(Area `i CPC is mov'ng ahead with its''Si -bed psychiatric hospital project -CPG north of Fontana. is, however, encountering,-,,delays in Ghtaining utilities for its site.. Patient origfis'patte-ns suppo;�t the f4ct that the proposeo_CPC facility is .o6tside the PILL service Charter plaos t-�'.build a hospital in Redlands, some 25 miles east of Rancho Cau.Oopga. natural patient flow would indica,�e this location to be well outside of PIA "s proposed service area;, 4. sierra Rovule Our recent acquisition in Azusa is looted approximately 23 miles from the Cucamonga site and is in a different market area. We do not see the two facilities compet'fig, but an the contrary will complement one another. 4 IS P( h ►a Wsive efforts to ex contact, inform, ind gain the > 1PP 0 of ftn, V health, professionals, community leaders,_ { oi"fi�iNal�;j and �uh`liG agencies. �ectgid° 1j d! Key psyonalogists and sociaf)workers have been interyiewed.t " o In'addittor. "a more Axtensive group of inental hearth care oroviders, was ssirveiYed' 4y maim with tax -;pi ne &'pw —vgt to ' determine their ,interest in. Pt:nning and supporting; the PIA facility. Forth of, oe resO4 -:nts who appeared most inireristed were invited 0 a meeting tO learn t orte f" �Wt PTA and Plates for the hospital. o Ply has also contacted and 'met with the Community Advisory Commission of the City of Rancho Cucam!,nga,�th.e San iernardino 1' 'COMRi5'kiOr, County 1��veltile ;Justice and D0.Uguencyk ftt, the County�j Mle tat Healtk A-1v Isory� -Beard, _ at Orel I as. represent :#`Wes of *he Board of Super'Osors, City Cougcil, and public sch�DoI and mental r ' health deR��rttnts. = V I .� E. Ph- sician Support, - The physician base Ito supVort She new facility is, excellent. KIT signiv "rcant active psys,rr trists in the area ;(six, including one . chil:d,.- psychiatrist) have been personally interviewed and invited uo partlr pate in planning the facility to meet local; needs. fir: ,. ,. P. Risk Variatfles. One risk it competition'fr'om ex isting or proposed facilities in the area. While the risk can be diminished 6Y the ( --�hport -of local„ professionals .in the area, time becomes a significant factt,. in dealing with the proposed new facilities. g. Census Buildup PTA is confident that the p`itient volume will be achieved The patient volume as, umptions ra lect expectations of demand from known referrals, need. and the r �mbursement climate. Census projections are built up monthly, allows for seasonal variations, in order to assure a realistic prof tion for average daily census. The projections, developed b consensus of PIA Development and' Operatives, are con.servativ compared to the actual predicted "demand from referrat squrce's asllshown in Attachment 3. The average's annual daily census projeeted'y by expe ted referral sources follows; „ r PROJECTED ANNUAL AVERASE DAILY CENSAJS (ABC) ADC Year Year z Year 3 ear Referral Source (FY 19891 (FY 1990) IVY 1931), (FY 1992) Local gsychiatrists 13 21 26 27 RecruittO.psychiatrists � r - - Other physicTnns '2 '2 3 +2 Schools 2 3 3,-,:, 3 Hospital emer9ency rooms 1 2 J Clinical psychologists/ 12 20 21 23 Mastered socialworkers 'irect referrals'to facility S i 7 Total X ,$ §$ �w L1 l A site has been located in a--`business park appro'ifmately 3.0 mi -les north t of 1-10 and 1:5 4i 1:i�S west of J -Z,8. The mayor growth -in Rancho 1 << Gucamon a is ;us;t, north of the site. The site is at the intersection of u Red ,Oak and Arrow 0riv& ,I 4. µms` ✓ �� V. TT tETABkE,�;` 18 months i apprtval to apeniag o ME appifoval tiovember , _1986. "a o Construction,prtjected to ,begin May, 1987, " o Construction complete - Nay, 1988. ' o Projected opening date Jnne, 1988. " w� 19W o„ J�4 v° L4 2 s �< sa IVA as s it i mausnGaroirre r 3AY - p 0 -s s N37P� � („ �✓ Pte. inF C c ~W �� YoIIJt 2 D t7 E X3TdW W m71{S(IQh: t�p,{yy� �p� ai Q 6 Il I C01 O vi G. oCa'a ,Ci 4 V 2 2fiR F U Y3 55 a v moalb8oz) 3nM3AV N3AVFf NORTH CI Or' TC.it: 1 -40 RANCHO CUCAINI NGA PLANNING DIVISIQN m- '- 4 k4 ®Q I 420 PAS 00:5 2 Em NORTH CI 4' ovv rrE_ RAINCHO C CANTO 'G , a- PLANNING LIVIS ON EXHIrAT'- _. SCALE. M-ao k s y NORTH crry Of. ITEM. Ilt PLANNING DIVIStO ��.t �e r 4 ilxw !/uY' YYTYIM.T YYYM \IW ._ YMw aYHpA ��,'i" a9 ' a_a alniaL rYSr awt 4 `.. I, itlYR YIGtw l` .YYS'�CiY'fr. K 91YtsaY 'nM LYYI IFq xiYni\Y °n YK 1A1T1YU n YIYa. ' ! ,iiii. aif' : Y -Y �Tr :Yw ayRlll. °M' .M ti0[ZTE[ �' CrIT OF RANCHO CUCAivlO,*\ A nTa PLANNING DIN'LSIQ m _ate 1 Cm t PtEW"wL sa w `rya fx» nYaa .� z� a Irx rod ►�asaxn¢ �CAWW" i 10_3 W.A fie � �- i CITE' OF PLANNING DIVED' J ►Yt -a3 .�HIt;tT: SC t.E= '` _ ti � tQ 4� rn -a t r as a 9 ell 8 r R 1 fl F a 3 1 g v 5 C g. a U �z k � In 9 U-Tf Nit m-a� I i i »} ) / ■ � � T . 7 . . J �\ � � � � � j � � E7 �t�$ � 1'r", 071 -0 0 2 -25 -87 rC Agenda 4 , 1-70 6, • + 1 I Jim ZI4F., ..f ;5.:+,ea r+ } • 1 _` mil r '�. � �� t. �; •,, .� `tee ,' / -3� � , s j t �vdr' • �i' i ,r + '�- ,� m RESOLUTION NO. A 96SOLUTIO14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLA��R1?NG CO�iYSSI.U"is „ APPROVING COWI ITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85 -!% FOR .Nt7 "BED if i PSYCt#IATitIG ?TTRL i3OiATE� AT THE XORT4 T Ci1R?�ER OF ARIOVI t OUTE W RED SOAK STAW- IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK TRICF SUBAREA, 7 OF THE INDUSTRIAL $PECL #,'IC PLAN WHER4,S, on the 9th day of February, 1987, a complete application. was fileld by Brawn -Leary Architect & R:u minCfor�lrevieii of the above- deooribed project; and. 11. WHEREAS, on the 25th day of FebruaryY Ig &�.� the Rancho Cucamonga PlaWng Commission held a pu4lic hearing to consider the above-d 0. irribed € project. NI?W, THEREFORE, the Rancho, Cucamonga Planning commission resolved its follows*. -- SECTION 1: .That the following findings can be'1'set, 1. That the prsposecFuse is in accord with th�� G!:neralj ! Plan, the objectives of the Iodu.strial Spec,i c Plait' � and the purposes of the district in which the site ..is located. 2. That the proposed use, togethc�' with the con itions applicable thereto, Nill not be detrimental ;',to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to proporties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Jat the proposed use complies with each of the applicabie Provisions of the Development Code. and tho Industrial Specific Plan. '.SECTION. 2: That this project with the added mitigation measure will not createarse impacts on the environment and that a Negiative Declaration is issued on Febr�dry 25, . 1987....' SECTION 3: That - Conditional Use Permit No. 86. -30 is approved subject t4 t e o owing conditions: PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 86 -30 Brown, Leary z:. February 25, 1947 k - Page 2 k AML Planning Division: 1. Submit revised plans indicating additional 20 parking spaces provided along the northeast side of the building, prior to submitting for plan check. 2. The stamped .concrete texture pavement shall be r changed to interlocking 4rick pavers, exposed' aggro ?ate or a combination of them. 3, The continuous . pedestrian pathway in front of the north elevation shall be of such materlols as exposed aggregate brick pavers or a combination of them. 4. Full material samples shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. 5. The block walls along south, west and north elevation shall have additional architectural '`- elements such as a brick cap or reveal. Detail design shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. 6. Light bollardtc,�,Oall be added to the building entry area. 7. The detail design of the large square motiff and grid pattern reveal shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building pera►its. 8. The tree pallette proposed for this project shall be consistent with the landscaping theme used for Rancho Cucamonga Business Park. 9. Submit revised lands%:ape plan indicating the added density of landscape material consistent with the City requirements, prior to submitting for plan f check. Engineering Division: k 1. A in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electric on the opposite side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The fee shall be of the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Red Oak Street to the east ; project boundary). M fig :7, 77 E PLANNING CW0=191f R" �u cup- , 86-10, Or ' It I - , Opt NO. own eary Febrwary 25, 198-7. Page 3 2. A, let. Iine adj4stment or a Parcel Map to relocat�k, Iq Tine� . that Cross buildings shall, be recorde�'%' or to, Issuance of bailding permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2"j. DAY OF FEBRUARY, 19s7. PLILWAG COWISSION OF TRE CIV OF RANCW CUCAMONGA By- -97 DaWid ar er irnm ATTEST —9-Fid zu7erl e S r y 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the P lanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do fibr.)4y certify. that the foregoing 'Resolution was du fy and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Ccinisalon of the i 'Rancho Cucamonga, at ZL' regular meeting of the Planning Commission held City ot, an the,'05th day of February, 1987, by the followitng vote-to-wit: 1p AYES: COWISSIONERS: NOES; COWISSIONERS,- ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IML M � gg6 C nom® w � r. o � i y� N �G A Y QwM n NG OC O y O V - N CAY Y ,. ww.$01 pwt Y u NE N. v% aGse .r�b66 66 mEr a« r L r+�o'� W.�. OY� 1?��O,q si: ^l�J tYNr yY �Olf F!tiptl M 4 N. JIY PML ^ S g w - Ma� o I 4 1 Qa4 ^ Y 9R V �m1�Y W wL� aC� c` •. Naw w mN~w q w � r. o � i y� N �G A Y QwM n NG OC O y O V - N CAY Y ,. ww.$01 pwt Y u NE N. v% aGse .r�b66 66 mEr a« r L r+�o'� W.�. OY� 1?��O,q si: ^l�J tYNr yY �Olf F!tiptl r M 4 N. JIY PML ^ S g w - I �n «.. x 9R V aC� c` •. Naw w mN~w P rag1 « wAg m r 4 ^ S g w - I �n «.. x aC� c` •. Naw w mN~w rag1 « wAg m t P ` W v=iygna utp yU Rg y x cw. N v$?4 O .i A rw 6r SNm.«ns ter.. rn - r 2 �.a U a a` YE® �gNRN OwN•O�4i$.� cd NY:MY a.l G3Yrtp ��° �w w {AV{Y� Is 9a i�.YL • 1YOCf, w.1 o d y o aS O �NN ILIL a. C C 7Y4 ^J +tlVY��c o +Yy` LUG M^ to cMr''s.�a 1PNV r � sp G fJy � p .C. oA. TJ A �Y1!cY„a�a fv.d °a a� Sg w as egg a� �2 5( S E8 K A-F USX rY L� q60 if cf +BB inn v fitO.! OwC f "�N +y w 4K b YdGdM L. d.f�L�[ LN �OL1 V LOOj`�j LN a z �Lj. f6 �C -3 y =tt ��at yS ay > QVVry� C�. per. OS YR` �. pyY �L -..dGU ^c -� MCcC Opp�SN VCrY M$Q °`_�.� uiy w�ie ^�¢Op2, �ugC`aligk� �'t'RL �'i °Ga a. 4��N. =y$ wY vCL-ptl 66c �6. e�"ewu. tiv =.�gp4`u pY.!!.Yp g °QYYc •u e13 U-- Y� da{,�Y Vu Nw �V L .a��c °C� 6T N�yM dOY O1 Q� L. >d VG pO90 L> iCA Gp 4E °{d{., ` �N� p �. TY c�G�Y Wcd Gb CO O q S=. �iM� aY gO.�IL '..a OB QwdY O �RZGpa,_ -S ti.�W G� VG9C pC� F+a.. PG NM J w Nw dNN w Aab d O! �� 1�t LVS1r 9r MY N wwYa� .. LL`j G �`4 Cppq Ntl yL g ee SIR Y 7p d$ ,,pp■ d Cam. N Y a g° �ca ^e°C °Y*�uga ^^aQayC p° cgo �. °c - cop ~moo O Ea L .Y C 7 + Y Y> •w O V d C> N O w �Y.$ m -31 N 1 a }3; V w a L aY Oppapp� Ya ~ aE� ►�Yw� C Y ►.�yy j FEZ a" r,-t_i5 -mM 1,2 gCgCf9� N °moo yys 11L A u am ac Y+ � 6~yap 6 fy� �T ^i'Qpi QYnpN Oyu m7 n' N yi1R 3- 4 � g C ^cf�1�n ^ da =Yp6Y® o wa�4y �YVY,' ft vG 4M �p Iv vz Amy yY 0CC0 Yp �IIM6� NL:1.$a <qt i. 64 �Y^pprp.�.. L. Ii�gmM J5�H. X ; MM CO. p. r C qC Y ^a0 React qR 9� �r:N Yom. N mqL. u S ► YZ Le. _ Y�N� a.� �^ s^ r p. 4g M`$s OON. Q y 01Y A i---Hl NS Y C,a �� .. Ya N Cy.G. 01 aN.ii NNw�{Q Pq=y C�x. 6 �NppC 8$p ~.. v ,w,w pp `Rw M CQtlYN� yp as a91p..a �wy� Am yYu =N yLj.GnC Ay ^y4 �L. YQ^O' S i L °M C yC W- YH4 a.Oj�^ L yy R Y + O b. L 6j.Cyp iilff�33• p O ►� ��y�iiTTiy pp'p N p LR ^�..a^l LYL q Lx qN ^ U N O 9% yC p uN Q .. Ra s np Cd C� 4 4 py�,w y.Uyq ►Ci. �R�q` <N.w ®Y ^6N R1.N uq NON N <N^ rra wti.M� 520. HNC ..� Z Y p X41 Lqw. rY SL C 4tp1,Y- �vLCiyy ^u O� L M a aye d X _. 4w1y m! a Ya ~ aE� ►�Yw� C Y p�C j FEZ a" r,-t_i5 -mM 1,2 gCgCf9� uu-2R yys 11L A LAN , zg.61 N � Npo� 6~yap 6 fy� �T ^i'Qpi QYnpN Oyu SbL. CSO�yL.. �M.,L. uC QNCw N yi1R 3- 4 � g C ^cf�1�n ^ da =Yp6Y® o wa�4y �YVY,' ft vG 4M �p Iv vz Amy yY 0CC0 Yp �IIM6� NL:1.$a <qt i. 64 �Y^pprp.�.. L. Ii�gmM m! a ^N... 0.4 so1S g6 G 1'S sib c TrpQeM 6q1' N Waa C^ � Y Q^ CfCUV VMS ^ '� Y Q y 01Y A i---Hl NS Y C,a �� .. Ya N Cy.G. 01 aN.ii NNw�{Q ;a NC o v ,w,w `Rw M CQtlYN� yp H '4 Lty • yt. Y qy o � L' L �' M6 N 9 Lwn T.d S i d C C yC W- a.Oj�^ L yy R Y + y. V ^M C^ u. a YO Lyac�R`9 tlt,o G uq.N YgYV Y Ci p duipp uN Q .. Ra s np Cd C� 4 4 py�,w y.Uyq ... Y.. Nr. 9L. YyR.. qO�.p Zv n�Cj a l R -C- 9gRpG ^6N ��p C.. uq Y u L �� 2{� a p X. C. �ppIuq Ny^ 61► % ^ a ^+^ NO` L N L p pEG u m! a Z N U a L a Ell W] .p` y E f �N ■yy.... a. O E. M N w .w Ira sail za yU 1%; Its O g y no �p°g��oiD •gym }J -U F85 y•6 ^gcam 0.��48 rew C¢ f P Q t Y] U N yOMa y0.. L 91 IS " FF usii r o„ LOI _¢s x 666 Nn�'i ". C10� 't o. Vi a m Op+ r.L'CY o��LL �J m i'UM 5 ..� �Jp.N V-' ■y «� I r 90. ^an • C Y ICS W O. � �p �. u J« IsP r S bZ.2 s vci -.83i 39. IT 9 .rq � yY6�pwty cY yy�Cc9q�Ap _¢ yC O a W �1 S r- if �pN�Sp yy. « Y� A9 �✓M1 q NCB. Y" • prY �Y �SE ~_ �L.� �!' dN� Ur 'v3w Ell Pq (L "q�8sya LAmG ' _ C�Y e U yG C �Ir.L Gl yC • W. tz- 64r. a " rY .� 6 g$Yo V_ 4OC. aaV �Yy°L r3CO C uNM quit' M GUH N.QQ N Q �C� 40 'SHE pM6,9 O y.cy CI `pY ^ 3=«�i ga CT� iY dd �Y 3 C oNe ��yy 5 ENV �qo c v ��'� �� ^$ r tl O e ' Y9 C E■■ pno � u Y Y• '-L. w OwC.. M 01 p�p�0.'rr �C 6 O�■p�a. "� "rp #t"iq EN V4 Y -YV P OTTq�C Y Lppp�L CC9 Yt5AS N a�8 ■pPl3L �0Q$0�S¢ G Q ca .o •� s 0.. y C i1�..PQ Ym'a. j A x ! i _ 3 P. ILS J4— Au%�y �Mw.a•6 a ��. sa +� o Ha ffi P �y q� .T $w �6 _ " �t i a ^ .�i `. _ $. y � p y.. +i N. i.'�� ft•- N � 0• }�.` µ — $� &� 3Ai Si ® P O M IR • N M A is $.bvy ~p[ a ffi fib' 9 =� MW a =oig eq$ `r ��_ p S Zi $u: O.0 .Y. :S. z •. YN ;-I N� OPi. �� UY�Y ateC. L'Y�Y.. .•� qi � ��LrT �y 03. 3!3% N± id 9. � .6�qC■ O y eV !'A .CCnr` �CFq. sirii. y' Cie .iis 6CC ^y.M4 VgO�ta w= yOq'. rry OY1.0 aYG9 a� Cpp -Z PN 40r= �N- G CO.�{ vA NY'4lN� aC 7. �Ci OLt !•'Y'4 C E Y T j h1 -3� a %y4 rD Y y a y. Zvi all Sk $ JZ5T Jq Its Jigs 1-1 t a ;r 12 1 _, °mss 1 1$ 44 I= -', *� .3. ski yY ! at 4L it S -t �.�z, OF: it a. ■a■pa �uv aur'r V y pad. � 6 • 9 u aa� a _ a' q 121H, ii la Cy 4R P'a 'i V ti: Y4M �LLL Y� NM •M V9 O a� 1-wi ut• 68' W f all tL•. ® A Y • N N 7[ a. ■a■pa �uv aur'r pad. � 6 • •p �Q � M� OC ig�. Y > � � a _ 121H, ii la Cy 4R y�. OOpp �1�iII LiY �I�� tl� a� 1-wi !a a'a Y D V in U- M L q rt cxtc -a le Z gj. fi gpQ{ LL EE yfMf. S" Cc :33 is u E;;y E'er'' a+ 1-4 94 E ES yy Yyy . LAr 3 yy O y �r Y4^ O z .0 v a 0 i a -a le Z gj. fi gpQ{ LL EE yfMf. S" Cc :33 is u E;;y E'er'' a+ 1-4 94 E ES yy Yyy . LAr 3 yy O y �r Y4^ CITY OF R.ANCRO CUCAMONGk1 �v�t STAFF RE11,QR AMIL o t- z DATE: February 26,`1987 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning f4m;irission k� t FROM: Brad Stiller, City Planner BY: Cindy Morris, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: i NV1ROii�l ilTA1, ASSESSM£pf7' & CONDITIDtM US£ PERMIT 87 -01 J'he es a s n o a Da ng' con rac cis o ce and yard in an existing building will} a lease spate of 1„640 sq. ft.'en 2.99 acres of land in tai General Industrial District (Subarea 4) located at 5375 Arch$bald;Avenue, Snite 601 • APN: 220- 071 -48 i I. PROJECT AND SITE DESG .P� TION: { A. Actiory Requer;,ed: Approval of Condit1boal Use Permit Ind Issuance If a Wative Declaration. ANAk B. -Surrounding Land Use and 2onin or - s ott rket, Indg4t,ial Specific Pi an (Subarea 4) South - Existing Industrial Park, Industrial Specific Plait' --� (Subarea 0 East - Industrial, Industrial Specific plan (Subarea 41 West .. Existing Industrial /Archibald, Indutrial Specifip, Plan (Subarea 41 C. General .Plan Designations• Sit e""�nera tt�ustrial J North General Industrial ,:- South` General Industrial East - General Industrial WeSt - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site is a single unit within an ex su ng mu - enan 'industrial complex Consisting of eight (8) buildings on 4.65 acres. There are 275 parking space$ for the entire site with 26 spaces directly adjacent to the uniit. E. Applicable Regulations: The proposea use is classified as a Buuil -ding contractors affice, And Yard which is a conditionally permitted use in Subarea 4 of the Industrial. Specific Plan:. f _ 1 ITEM' STIFF T CUP B7 j- �Ilinsi Wre Builders February -25, 1987 Page;.2 II 11 AItAL.YaIS.rr �., A. G M,ra l• Inland Empire Builders currently occupies 1,640 !qt eet of-Wilding GOD which has a total leass, space of 6,Sea sq.. ft. The aplplic &rat intends to use the spaclr primarily as an office with only a minimal amount of interfgr, storage. No yard area, or outdoor, storage is proposed. The btiAiiness will be conducted between f:* hours of 8:00 a,m. to 6::00 p.m, Monday through,Fridaay and wili be staffed by t►w employees. The proposed uto is generally compatible, with the existing adjacent tenants in Buildings 500, 500, and 701, .as listed in Exhibit "D".. These tenants include custom manufacturing and office related -users with primarily traditional weekday hours, as well as tw* churches with weekend and evening hours. Both churches, the Rancho Evangelical Free Church and the Calvary Chapel, ::are presently undergoing review by the Planning Commtssion, e applicant will be sharing a 26 space parking area'direc; y adjacent to Buildings 600 and 700 Olthibit.HVI Used on a lease area of 1,440 sq. ft., Inland Empire Builders kill be allotted four M' Parking spaces (Exhibit "D"), This will leave 12,. surplus spaces, indicating that there is sufficient parking available to support the intended.. use. B. Environmental Assessments Upon review of Part I of the Initial stuoy and cociplation of art II of the Environmental Checklist, staff had, , found no significant environmental impacts as a result of'-Ws proposal, I1I. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development, Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Specifin Plan Subarea in which it is located as evidenced by the Conditional Use Permit provision for a building contractor's office and yarn in this Subarea. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or Improvements in the vicinity. I] E REPORT l _ CAP B- y,� .Ie Builders o .. February 25, M7 Page 3 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial 5d'ecific Plan. That sui`ifdent parking exists for tht proposed use and surrounding tenants. IV. CORRESPONDENCE.- The item has been Advertised as a public - rearing e �`Q#r�t rewspaper, the roperty posted, and notices S.. to ai ti owners within 30D feet of the project, and to all businesses 'located in 8u41dings�6O01anrf 760.. Y. REC014iElitlATIONa Staff recommends that the Planning Comission s 4 ve Declaration and approv -z Conditf Mal Use Permit 87- 01 thorough adoption of the attached icisol "itior. and Conditions of Approval. Respectfully su itt rad Buller City Plainer BB :CN:ns Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Exhibit "D" - Tenancy and Parking Exhibit "E" - Resolutions of Approval N- J City of R: Cucamonga p o Applicaor AFW �.FILE Z GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED NAME OF PROPOSED - PROJECT .ELATED FILES U6237-t,11 !NC ARCHICENTEk #)j LOCATION OF PROJECT '(ADDRESSf`F" -" 9375 Archibald Av, Suite 601 _ _ i I A7 �IC;4rS NAME tELEF te01E ADDRESS Roger E. Turner, Trustee 714 241 -1141 1435 E. Warner Av, Santa Ana, CA 92703 OWNER'S NAME - TELEPHONE Roger -E._ Turner. Trustee ,j7g')24? 114 z ADDRESS - 1495 � Warner Al r Santa.-Ana rA 49705 REVIEW REQUESTEI!' � 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* ❑ TECHNICAL/DESIGN REVIEW 14 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT— COMMER01AL OR INDUSTRIAL* NON CONSTRUCTION* ❑ TECHNICAUDESIGN REVIEW -- z 1 ❑ OSVELOPMENT DISTRICT A 2NDMEINT RESIDENTIAL* W i (?)NE CHANGE) ❑ TOTAL DEVELOPMENT 2 f ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ BASIC ciANDARDS CL ❑ OPT.ONAL STANDARDS Q MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ❑ CUSTOM LOTISUBDIVISION l W[3 MINOR EXCEPTION ❑ DESICN REVIEW (REAPPLICATION) I > 13 PRELIMINARY REVIEW* ❑ VARIANCE W I ❑ EN7ERTAiNM.:NT PERMIT ❑ ❑ ❑ f *It Is mandatory to complete Pa I & III of the Uniform Application z PROTECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTIOU C= P46r0SFD PROJECT (AT7 -ACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS X NECESSARY) Suits G01 will T,e used as a building contractgr'° office and storage_ d( of contractor's materials, etc,. The Suite consists of anprox_'- mately 1b5Q ,;g', ft. of which approximately 400 sq. ft. is office spade with - it 11, 4 the balance warehouse space. No yard area or outside storage is 0 permitted. f._ OWNER CERTIFICATION 1 i i CERTIFY THAT i AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. I FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICtATIOI. .ND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE rr ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. AGENT' OF OWNER MUST ATTACH A LETTER OfNik (� I AUTHORIZATION FPJM THE LEGAL rjWNcR. C3 :DATE- 1 25 -87 SiGNATURE: t PRIINTNAM LE Roat.�ENIED u1rnPr' �t a .1MJer1 N'a, J AECEIPT 6d hf+:P t48 -36-59 �t Ti` 7?14 1 Uj Z.Ga a1C Par.!' Par 2 Cc 1 ' dt s' Is I :7 (8 003 M1 �. 49iAC SAC O 299 ' "Ott ti. E ° Par R/W i { Parr !' i ,�' 3.5E+1G - � • '� � Par sue: i zQ 3.33 CG` STRE _�:,r: •� � �a1 � $fit I� IV Z38ACt . , 4;1, par. F ►• :' -3E22 y4G M/G a waxh 4t r1 6.13 AC xVi _ to aaw kLi3�iC'321 (rVj` H I f &M,7 00 4 '38 'A38AC. 4 3s n , P CCC -26 r PAPT t8 y a 1.9QACti * i riMOI Z.2O41 Y v P. Ln4 sNfdt . A 4 f18aC�3 If2 2CR yy. 45 AC 4B s� a �,t T loluH j CITY OF RANCHO CUCATvtr- NGA PLANNING DIVISION F1HiBrr: _�►ic >> s r'. _'+ 1 I ,� ! ! ' -,fir,• ' -' �r,. � •� '•'.'11I,II,f�I ;' ^ii11III11I�I�E� ' ,. tlllll; +t ,II j �` �`? ,'i�'�CtiJ'�i�i �i•1t! °ri��ftlt.��t =�� 1 i ';,, I 1 3 Tx tr i'u s ` w ! •I �. S ' rt• s' �v, asfy__`= ?•L':�:•;mn�L.— .__- _�.... —._.. •.s'!+ti -.r .:- wsar---- --',�.•�•'� I/ �! NORTH CITY OF ETr�i: RANCHO CUCAj-vjoNGk TjrLE- At PLANN1,NG DS 'Lsm EXHI 31T= SCALE- 7 I-- CITY OF dap gz::o RATNCa O CUCATIVIONGA TITLE= P PLANNING DIVISION E.tFillllT ,. ScALc-. N -7 CITY OF PLA"NNINCC DjWSjo.N EeHier:_. . l.c= I A t BUILDIN& 600 -700 PAK;IN& ANd6YSI,1 USE SQ. FT. PAVING NLMER OF BLDG. SPACE RATIO SPACES Ceravic 1640 S /500' _ 3 Friewl Pkneo 3280 MOO i Ie1ard 1640 11 gui7 ers Total to Total va e 3 = . i° .mss N�carde F& WAVO . •.. � � M6snte. Jill. i •-11(11 {11 ;�•lllilifiiill s }4i'� CITY OF PLA"NNINCC DjWSjo.N EeHier:_. . l.c= I RESOi.t1TION A RESOLUTIOX ,OF THE � 6tNC1i4 TONGA PLANNINf ' COmissION APP'RQV2� G, CIS R el ",1 i5E PER iT NO. 87 -01 M A BUILDING t COMTRAMT� R C FICE �.4�ATED 9375 ARCN2BAt,O AVENUE, SUITE 602, IN' INE GI 9 INDUSTRITAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on ik Ilth daffy' of P.ebruaryg 2987, a complete application was filed by Inland Wfre Builders fer review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day, of February, 2987, the Rancho Cucamonga ' punning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described project. t NOWT, TKEREFORE� the Rancho Cucawn9a Planning CoW, scion resolved as a ValI ows: SECTION 1 That the following findings cart be mei 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Place, the objectives of the Industrial Specific:Pla`, and the purposes of the district in which site is located. AOL 2. That the proposed us , together with the condhtions appli „able thereto, *ill not; be detrimental to the public health, safety, or we are, or materir_tly injurious to properties or Mprovements. in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan, SECTION Zz <', That this project will not create adverse impacts on the eylvironment—an-a7frat a Negative Declaration is issued on February 25, 1937: SECTION 3: That Conditional Ilse Permit No. 87 -01 1 approved subject tta e o owing conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sectf)ns of the Industrial' Area Specific Plan and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of .occupancy., iU -9 c� A —10 f Reso.'ution No, CO � -M - INLAND 'EMPT' E BUILDERS NbruItry 25, 1987 6 rage }r 2: Any slgr}s proposed for this Conditional' Use Permit shall be desfgned in confamtjc* with tole CoWrehensive Sign Ordinance and the approved Uniform' Sign Proqra*L and shall roquire reviO and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 3. Any modiVcatioo expansion or other change in; op, ton will rr�yu re a revision to the Conditional ,else Permit. 4. That there shall be no otbtdoor storage of construction materials, d ,1 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY' FEBRUARY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUI PAONGA BY,, "... C. Davia 5arker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad u er, Deputy Secretiry I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the, PI&AMng Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the f6igoing Resolution was duly and E regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cowl scion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comission held on the 25th day of February, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS,. ASSENT: COt+MAISSIONERS. A —10 . rermcr ter, tti fx rnrr� nrr. -� . Lrry . - us a i vi i;rr irv.a,av a. v v�auvi� uri. � L,(;isk.k(tj,�ry STAFF REPORT � y' - i �N DATE: February, 25, 1967 TO: Chairman and Members of the planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SU &3ECT: CON_nITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -24 - THE PLANNING GROUP - The request to amend the approvea Conditional Use PeFmit by adding business support services t9 a convenience sales and services development project on 1.18 acres of land in the General Industrial /Rail Served District (Subarea 2), located at the northeast corner of 8th Street and vineyard Avenue - APH 243 - 013 -15. I. BACKGROUND: The Planning Omission, at its regular meeting of ece er , 1986, conditionally approved a 12,000 square foot Convenience Sales and Service Center. It is the proposed use, Convenience Sales and " ,vices, which typically include businesses as beauty shops, latmdry & stores selling toiletries, that required the Conditional Use Permit, However" in reviewing the Application Form and all the Development Plans as shown in Exhbi't "A °, Business Support Services type of land, use is also included. This type of land use cod-.1d include businesses such as clerical, •mpioyment office, blueprint/copying service, etc. Both types of lard use provide a service to the public or a specific client and would be compatible with one another. Therefore, staff is requesting that the approved Conditional Use Permit be amended to Include Business Support. Services as stated on the attached Resolution of Approval, II. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed project Is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and the Industrials Specific Plan. 2. That the propsed use, building design, site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Specific Plan. 3. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ITEM 0 F4 PoRr CUP 064.94 ;1* rang Group �. February 25, IBG Page 2 r M. GORRi SPOPlDFt10E: This item has been advertised n the Dail iy Report newspaper as a =ruol, c Pleasing, property postc-d' an no :Vices were seat to all propertj`,gwners within 300 feet of 9 project site. r, IV. REC"EMDATFQN: Staff ' eecoMends that the Planning Omission e p poed amendment Use Permit 86 -24 through the adoption of the attached resolutior. Res p fully s ed } or Sulr { City P nner! 08: WF: rs Attachments: Application Form for CUP 86 -24 Exhibit "A" — Approved Site Plan Resolution of Approval' 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga PART 1 ,^...,. ' riorzn -east corner of vineyard Ave. NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT APPOUANMAME The Planning Group (Jim DeAguilera, Pres.) ADDRESS. 1435 Court Street Reno, Nevada 89501 gEPIERAL INFQ!% aT10* REQUIRE-_. .. EarlWnni's ADDRESS - 7372 Berkshire Ave. - Cucamonga CA 91730 DEYE. DISTRICT GM �9f'i'Austri a..l. EXISTING LANI I.S. P. Rail c:.vM Vern+. PART t Uniform Applioa$ a FILE NO. TELEPH ( 714) 1.10 acres STRUCTURESQU n _ r REVIEW REQUESTED � °- 13 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* M TECHNICAUDESIGN REVIEW — • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT— COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL* NON CONSTRUCTION* Q TECHNICALJDESIGN REV IESti: — • DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT RESIDENTIAL* (ZONE CHANGE) ❑ TOTAL DEVELOPt.)ENT • GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 BASK,, STANDARDS • MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW O OPTIONAL STANDARDS ❑ CUSTOM LOT /SUBDIVISION ❑ MINOR EXCEPTIG; G DESIGN REVIEW C PRELIMINARY REVIEW* ` Z VARIANCE *It is mandato to complete Pa,t j & 11 of the Uniform Application PROJECT DESCRIPTiM* OWNER CERTIFICATION - I CERTIFY THAT I AM' PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, 1 ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.iAGENT OF WNER MUST ATTACH A LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION FROM THE LEGAL OWNER. DATE October 1, 1986 r SIGNATURE: PRINT NAME. &TITLE: Thomas G. I'iatlock, Architect DATE REC'D RE EIVEO BY FFD,* FEE5RECEI� RECEIPT NO. (� -3 5 -7 9137 i' � s s r I ni s M 4 � t T .{ •{,r.! §§E33 t t to is °� i t d73c i i i T sil.�i F ; a= flIF'g UU RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING. COMISS M APPROVING; THE MEN014ENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT W. 86 -24 DR c 12,000 SO. FT. CONVENIENCE SALES AND SERVICE CENTER TO INCLI��E BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 8 H STREET b VINEYARD AVEN C IN THE GENEMN. mousTR1AL /RAIL SERVI D ' 01$TRIC;[ APR 201 - 013 -15 I� QN 0 WHEREAS, on the 25th day of February, 1487, the Rancho f�camongaJ Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. Lq-v is NOW, THERlrFpN1E, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning'Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the fallowing -- findings can ut met: S. That the proposed use is in accord with thi- Geperal Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposits of the district in which the site is located., 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditlo4s applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to tree public hea'.th, safety, or welfare, or materially'' injuripns 1io properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with Each of the applicabl1e provisions of the development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adver ,-!!�, impacts, on the environmen an , et a Negative Declaration was issued on December 10, 1987. SECTION 3: That Amendment to Cagdi"a3 Use Permit No. ft -24 is approved) s-55ye-ETTo the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISIO`(' 1. All conditians of approval contain in Resolution No. 8+"5- 181 shall apply, except for Planning Division Conditipn No. 5, which is repealed. 2. The approval of this Conditional Use Permit is fbr Convenience Sates and Services and Business Suppoht Service land use only. Other types of land uses are subject to Subarea 2 {General Industrial District; of the Industrial .5ppecific Plan. r i� Resolution No r; CUP 86=24 - A;enftent February 25, 1987 Page: 2 *. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF FESRUAR`,, 1987. � 3' PLANNING CONMISSIOH OF THE CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a BY: L. David garRer, Chairmak ATTEST; tS, FAR 0k , reputy re art' _. s I, Brad Buller, Oeputy Secretary of the Plannt;ig Cowmission of the City of b Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, .passed, and adopted by fuse Panning Cowission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; at a regular meeting of (,'Zi Planning Commission hard on the 25th day of February, 198T,'�r the follow n�: Ott-to-wit: AYES: COWISSIONERS; NOES; COMISrjONFRS: AOSENTt COMMrSSIONERa "z i� El (SATE: TO: . FROM: BY: SUBJECT.- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT e z Ci February 25, ISO? is:r Chairun and fi bens of the Planning commission Brad Buller, City Planner Chris Westman, Assistant Planner STREET NME 'CHANGE FOR _ it1A 3i ;AVENUE - Proposed to Aloe Hermosa Avenue, a nor soffth runr"'ii ng street from the Rancho Cucamonga City limits Just north of 4th Street t its terminus at Base Lire' ikoad, m distance �+ =" approximately three (3) miles. I. ABSTRACT: The City Council directed that a strut name change be initiated for Turner Avenue. The street name change is now before the Planning Coamtission for their review and consideration. The Planning Com+nission must forward a recommendation to rase City Council. II. BACKCiOUND Turner Ave-ve runs approximately three (3) miles from 4th Street to Base Line Road where the street ch4(nges to the nam of HArmosa Avenue. The intent of the City Council request is to unify the two street names under the singular name of liey�wsa Avenue. III. ANALYSIS: By creating a single name for those c0ltrtor streets, the portions of the community north and south of Base Line will share something in com®on which would strengthen their sense of cowunity in the City. Staff has contacted the Postmaster General for both Cucamonga and Alta Loma and the re, ponse hl"s been that e� unification would cause short term disorganization during "phasi)'% out . The mail clerks would be ratting Wo schemes to a single street. Once the new street note is established, this inconvenience would be eliminated'. ITEM P PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPMT STREET NAME CHANGE - TURD!^ r,7- !E February 25, 1997 Page The Sheriff's Department was contacted and stated that the ` 4 Emergency 911 system would note impacted by the napie change, once the new naaKe and addresses *�r6 logged into the computer. The Fire' District indicated that tiey support such changes for the purpose - of unifying street names within the -city, Correspondence was received from the City of Ontario City planner, Joyce Babica,:which stat.,d concerns for the street name change from Turner to Herosa.... A Urge portion of Turner Avenue runs thrJugh several miles -of Wtario% and she;felt tq)at it was more appropriate to change the nalae . of Hermosa to' Tar er.. Ordinance 144, ;' )ich established Street Naming Procedure; -, 6a,ct n 2, ordains -that i streets which are continuous shall be exte»AeQ eir "accordance with present street flames A&)ever possible and feasible. Although the two street names are already in existence, it., would seem appropriate to foll�'�, these guidelines and establish vIe continuous street name for Tur "r /Hermosa. In addition, tha proN.oed change is . in accordance w th Sectioo,,G of Ordinance 144 and can be justified by the following findj;ngs: A. It is onsistent with tip =_ goals and policies and objectifies of the General B. It is consistent with the .,adopted circulation _ - el extent. C. It will not cause significant adverse impact on the environment. P. It is deemed necessary to ,protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare. E. Hermosa is a historically significant name in that it is the same as one of the original tracts in the Alta Loma area. Potential impacts and issues are outlined below: Major impacts: 1. There are approximately 125 residences of which approximately 100 are at the apartments located on the north side of Arrow Route which would be effected by the name change. 2. There are approximately 20 businesses Located at the 'would southern end of Turner which require address changes. PLANNING COM@9ISSION STAFF REPORT STREET ME CHANGE - TURNER AVENUE k February 25, 1987 I_ Page 3 Yr i Minor Impacts: There are 29 street ' -name signs which would require replacement es folYowss r 27 single blades S 35 each 2 overhead signs $ 50 each Total $1,045 PLUS L&Nor $ 300 (Approximately) Total $1,345 2. Recorded neaps would reed amendment. 3. Utility companies, emergency services and the Post Office would have to revise L.Wr systems to accommodate the name change. 4. The name would end at the Ontario City limits. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been noticed in The Daily Report newspaper, designated areas were posted along Turner an 119 wr" ten notices were sent to property owi.Qrs and /or residences who faced onto or abutted Turner Avenue. To kAte, no response has been received from any resident or business iocaaed on Turner. V. RECOWENDATIONt It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public Y hearing and consider all the aspects of this proposal. If the Commission should concur with the proposal, a Resolution is attached for your consideration. Tt�t , )9:4 Brad Buller City Planner 9B:CW:te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Resolution of Approval RESOLUTION NO. A. RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONC.A PLANNIOG COF9NISSION�, l RECOWMING OPROVAL OF STREET *W. E CHANGE ,NO. 87 -01 • i QttEsT* • A CHANGE FRco, TwRKER AVEW -1 TO HERMOSA AA FRGk 1719,' SOl iRR9 RANCHO CUCM O' W' A' JCI-rf LIMITS ! NORTH TO ITS TEMINUS AT BASE, LIFE ROAD. fD _ 1 WHEREAS, on the 25th ,,day of February, 1987, the Planning 4ommission - held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 658640 the California Government Cot%r; and L WHEREAS, an the 20th day of May, 1901, the City Council adopted 1' Ordinance No. 144, establishing Street Naing Policy for Rancho Cucamonga; and \ , WHEREAS, the City Courki; has initiated the request for i Street Naze y Change for 'turner Avenue pursuant to Section 3.A.3 of Ordinance No. 144; and WHEREAS,, the Planning Division has,prepared'a report discussing the justification for, the change, recommending a replacement name and discussing- the impact of ft, proposed change; NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning CoWssion `has made >, the following findings: it 1. Ordinance No. 144 stAtes.fthat streets that are continuous shall be extended in accordance with the present street namas wherever possibi3 and feasible. 2. The proposed nuie °Hermosa" has" historical significance in that it is the same name as one' of ..F the first tracts in the Alta Loma area. 3. The proposed change wopld of create significant adverse iaipac'a- on the envirc.4ent. 4. The proposed change is consistent with the goals, policies and standards of the General Plan. S. The proposed change is consistent with the adopted' circulation eiacent. 6. The street name change is detwd necessary in order to protect the public hearth, safety, cotlort, convenience and general welfare. . P 5 gr PLANtlltd6 CONkTSS WN RE;St�t:UTION ; STREET N. CifiN!!!BE A1-0I4 X1987 Februarry. Page New, THgwoRE, BE IT RE��!}LVEO: IJ 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 - 6385" of the i`. C. al1&in4a Govern -wnt Cod, the Planning CowAssion of th!! Ci f of "Ra— mho eucaeon hereby recommends . ! pprovA, on the 26th day of February, 1987', of Street Name, Ch No. 87 1' _4' Inge -013 2. That the Planning CoWssion hereby reer ends that the City CounL41 approve and adapt Street Name Change No, 8741; ' 3. That 4 certified, copy o€ this Resolution and related material h��eby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded, to t. Ciis Council. APPROVED AW ADOPTTED THIS 25TH DAY OF FESRIIARY, 1987. 'g PLANNING tOM�TSSIOU OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCARONBA BY. E. Uavid sarker, 8'rman - ATTEST: --g-r-aa Suller, Deputy Wretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Coxxission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and t, regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the P1'anniog 'Coanission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of February, 1957, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: NOES: COMISSIONERS: - ABSENT: COWISSIONERSa ", --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON&A STAFF REPORT, REPORT , - U b> DAi`r: February 25,. 1987 _. test t 4 TO: Chairman and MiemtOrs�,r t�# Planning Commission FROM Brad Bulloar,, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Aosociate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESWI NT AND TERRA YISTA.PLANNED COWUNITY Z--..—WESTERN FROPEKTIES R The reques u amen errs Vista panne n by establishing a Business Park Overlay Tone for areas designated as office Park, C`bxnmercial and Mixed Use, within he planned community boundary. I. ABSTRACT: The developer is requesting for recommendation of approval for issuance of the negative declaration and approval of the Community. Plan Amendment tn:,keate a "Business Park Overlay Zone," II. BACKGROUND: The Planning Comari.ssion on February 11, 1987 continued this proposed Planned Community Amendment to this regular m?ef �--at the request of the apPicant. The developer has submitted--a thiri: revision to the lust of proposed land uses as s .)own in Exhibit "A°. Attached fcir your review is a better from the applicant responding to staLff analysis of December 10, 1985 Planning CamMssion staff report. The following section is staff analysis- on this revi.ed proposed amendment. III. ANALYSIS: A. Establishment of a Business Park Overpay Zone: The purpose of s overlay zone according ,.0 the developer,, is to provide for multi- tenant projects fostering small business development. These types of "incubatoru spaces would be targeted toward small business uses who require a combination of office and warehouse type space, with the office use expanding over time to fill out most of the building area. In addition to the uses permitted by the base zone, the Overlay Zone would allow ether land uses ITEM Q (/ ,' A PL44400 CO SS N STAFF REPORT TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 86 -02 WESTERN PROPERMS February 25, 1967 Page 2 B. that range from administrative and professional use, retail and service use �o custom manufacturing use as a It i listed }n Exhibit A Staff comw it: This proposed amendment would allow, subject a additional Use Permit, Business Park Overlay lone in areas designated for Office, Commercial, or�Mixed Use. Iq resppnding to staff is-December 10, 1986 Planning Commission report, the "developer is proposing;to limit the areas were such Overlay Zone could be established within the Planned Community boundary as shown in Exhibit "B% The developer, as stated in the attached February 10, 1986 letter, clarified that each Business Park project would be processed as`'a Conditions? Use Permit to afford the City additional review and control. kiost of )the land uses proposed within the Business Park Overlay Zones are already permitted or conditionally permitted within the following mixed use zoning designations: WC (Financial, Restaurants, Residential ), MOC (Mixed .Use, Offis�e, Commercial ), and HHO (Hospitals, Office, Commercial 1, ,! s shown in Exhib -it "C ". Therefore, creating a Business park Overlay Zone within these commercial designations would still be rndur,:dant, except for areas designated as Office Park. The primary issue, then, becanes those new uses propi`sed that would be in addition to those uses STReady allowed in the base zone. A large matrix chart with comparisons of the land uses allowed within Office and Mixed Use will bi avail'ble at the meeting for your review. Recowendateon: The proposed amendment should allow, subject to a Conditional Use Permit review process, Business Park pro ects in areas designated for Office Park only. This would eliminate unnecessary redundancy and maintain the integrity of the Commercial and Mixed Use Zones. In - zddition, the proposed definition of the Business !park Overlay Zone which includes "office ano warehouse type space" should be modified with the intention of discouraging warehouse type industrial use by changing it to read `office and limited storage area ". Uses Permitted in Business Park Overlay Zone: 1. This section starts with "administrative offices" and ends with "automotive service station (CUP)" and as listed below: 1 �s PI.ANFI•TNg C'OAM SSIONaSlA#F RE)RT TERRA YISTJ 6QDa C UNITY AMENDMENT 86-02,.. WEST Et "'N PROPOT ' F`ebniary 25, 1987 ., Page 3 o Administrative officas , o Professional office!t including, bul,� not limited to, prq�fessions such asp, accounting, law, i income tax., ; insurance, architecture, engineering, medicine, optometry, chfropractic, podiatry, osteopathy, dentis,cry, real estate, escrow, financial brokerage, securities brokeraSo,, and interior design. o Retail and service businesses serving the needs of office,users including, - bj;t•;`, not limited to, printers, stattbners, secretarial services, '. office supplies and equipment, office l machine sales and service,: and aessenger and postal services. o Commercial recreation facilities compatible with office use, including, but not limited to, health clubs or gyms (CUP), racquetball °courts (CUP). o Banks and other financial institutions o Eating and drinking establishments o Automobile service stitio65 (CUP) Staff Comments: A review of these types of proposed useindicates, that they parallel thosq uses allowable by the City's Development Code within the Office /Professional District. Thereforo, the proposed land uses as listed above are acceptable. RecommmendatIon; Approve the above section of land uses within Business Park Ovarlay Zone. 2. This next section starts with "retail studios, stores, and associated workshops" and ends at "interior design" as listed! below: ij a PLANNING Ct 'ISSIaN STAFF REPORT TERRA VISTA PLANNED C0t*UNITY AMENDMENT 86 0 "c <',,`, WESTERN PROPERTIES ebruary 25, 1987 Page 4 4 Retail `` studios,; stores, and associatp,d workshops _ kshops for the __d�e��si_ggn, fabrication, an :U-Te of handma ��r cuss om —macW pFoducts products usinets and res ; en •a ..rases including. but not. limitEd to. the following,, which embody customized design and /or hand craftsrinship rather, than mechanized product .fit, pravid -nq, such use does not constitute a nuisance to adjoining usas by reason of naisrs, vibration, , particulates, odors. hazards, or fragrant or large scale transport and subject to the approval of the City Planner: Jewelry, wearing apparel ._amd<• accessories, stained glass wares.; - picture frees, quiffs, ceramics, ' glass, leAhergoods, musical instruments, pottery, housewares, gifts, art and craft items, photographs, fashion design, interior design. Staff Convents: The applicant has attempted to e ine more specifically the scope of -the land uses for the proposed retail studio, stores and associated workshop. Essentially, the revisions clarify that these uses should be retail establishments whose products are intended for business and residential uses. Virtually all products are consumed or used by a business or residential urn,"-, therefove this does: not further define the s.-h of allowable uses. However, allowing studios or workshops which fabricate custom -Made products �s listed above is objectionable, as it is inconsistent with the intent of the Terra Vista Community Plan and the City's, General Plan. The custom -made And fabrication types of products are specifically defined by the City's .Trdustrial Specific Plan as Custom manufacturing. Allowing these industrial uses within Terra Vista would violate the fundamental tenant of zoning; The separation of incompatible land uses. Certainly, a „design studio" dr "artist studio" would not be objectionable, it is the fabrication' -of these products that is of concern.. The app7cant could limit the scope of the above proposed rand use by ;i M� �a t PE ANeJIN6 i C� OtI OF REPORT TERRA VSstA Rt,liP'ED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 86 -02 WESTERN PROPERnE February 25, 1987 ?age 5 defining further that this type of ,land use involves # dffics�_-s, showroom and associate6'workshop that is limited to, art and craft items such as jewelry, quilts, pFiotographs, picture frames, ceramics, potteries, and specialty small gifts. Rrcaeeendatfion: Staff rerommen&.-that this- �ectioii a propose usR be changed gas fd7lows, Retail studios., stores, and associated workshops for the purpd;se of sales, office,,. showroom, and designt with workshop for custm-ude sa,Vles of products for display only in the shoiwoom for the fgllowiflg types of art anti ci°27t items :,, Jewelry,ti�pictute frames, quilts, ceramics, potteries, specialty gift items. Custom- made consumer goods within :studios, stores and associated workshops may be allowed provided that the custom -made consumer good; are ancillary 'to the studios or stores and 'do not exceed 20 percent of the leased floor area; and subject to City Planner approval. 3. This section started with "retail and service businesses serving the needs of residential users ", and rids at "ticket sales, etc. "_ as follows: o Retail and serv''ce businesses serving the needs A1,, residential users, including, bf 'not limited to the n)llowing anO ibiect to the approval ;P the City'kinner: Appliance sales' and repair, plumbing supplies and repair, television and radio sales and repair, floor, wall, and window covering sales and installation, paint and home decorating stores, catering establishments, contractors (excluding contractor's yards ), beauty supply stores, fabric stores, sloe repair shops, antique dealers, security device sales and service, X, telephone sales, luggage sales, pet j grooming and supplies, dance studios, opticians, medical supply sales and rr �, PlANK1INgo �TQt� �• �'F REPORT y TERRA VTsTrti R A t1ED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 58.62 WESTERN PROPERTIES February E5, 1987 Page 6 a ° rental, electrical, eioctronic, data processing, and telecommunications i sales ands )service, audio, /video sales T and service, furniture sales, upholstery shops (except automobile upholstery), apparel- shops, and i similar businesses. 0'�' Co*v pience retail and service -, businesses such as food and beverage sales, newsstands, bookstores, barber ` and '•beauty shops, cleaners, trammel bureaus, photo developing, tuxeap rental, bicycle soles and repair, i locksmiths, ticket sales, etc. � Staff Cmw*nts: These types. of commercial uses ire already eIthFr permitted or conditionally perm vied within areas in the Terra Vista Planned,Co�lniC; designated for mixed use (MFC, MOC, and kNO) sxcot for office Park District. '-Therefore, allowing expansion of- these types- of,uces only within the Office Park District would eliminate redundancy and maintain t e degree of distinction and balance between commercial, office and vixed use type districts within the Terra Vista Planned Cnity. Further, staff determines that the following lists of land uses are incompatible to Office Park type of land uses: o Appliance store and repair, p1moing .shops and supplies, television and radio sales and repair. These_ types of uses involve large household items, service area for repair ane,, warehousing which is indicative of intensive c mmercial use and would not be compatible to office uses. o Floor, wall, and window covering sales and installation, paint and home decorating stores. Again, these types of land uses could involve large showrooms, and warehousing which is indicative of an industrial use. However, these types of uses are closely related to Q- PLANNI S.R S;C REPb{tT � TERFA VISTA Pi:�4NiFW i*'4k1GTY AMENDMENT 85 -02 7 '�i6.�st'ERN PROPEI�ES i`ebruary , i97 Page 7 µ, interior designing, therefore, by changing it to interior design office with showrrom, but without warthotesing of products, could be acceptable. a Upholstery shops (except ,automobile� upholstery),, This type of land, use could involve largo household items such as fux�lture and is indicative of a custom manufacturing use wh ch ` is incompatible to office Park type of hand. use, o Dane studios, Dance studios should be classified as commercial recreation facilities and a c*, Conditional Use Permit should be required to ensure its operation would not adversely impact. � (e.g. noise) other tenants. " ANOL Reccmmadation: Staff recommends that the above ME o -.yes, ncompatible to ,office type of uses, be eliminated from this list, While dance studio should be moved to commerc.(al recreation facilities as a conditionally permitted lary� use, 4. This section starts from "conaaunity facilities as specified above" and ends at "parking requirements .approved by the Planning C- nission" as follows: - o: Community facilities as specified above. o Accessory structures and uses necessary or customary incidental to the above uses, i 0 other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification, o Parking requirements for business parks shall be the same as for Office ` _Parks, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. Q n/�` _.red PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT TERRA VISTA PLANNED C"WNITY AMENDMENT 86 -02 WESTERN PROPERTIES February 25, 1987 Page 8 Staff JComeents The above land use languages are acc,eptable.. Recoiedatfian' Approve the above section of the land uses within the Business, Park Overlay Zone. IV. ENVIROMENTAL ASSE55 NT. As a result of the initial study, staff ' as determined that the proposed amendment may' hake the following potential significant �x adverse impacts: 1. The proposed amendment by adding custom manufactvH ng industrial type of land uses substantially alters the present planned land use of the Terra Vista Planned Community and the General Plan. 2. The,. proposed '``Meend*nt would conflict with the objectives and policies of the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plap,, �P 3. As a result of the I proposed amendment in adding Custom manufacturing industrial, uses within the residentially planned community, truck traffic would increase substantially, adding traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians, 4. As a result of this proposed amendment, people ma, be exposed to an increase in health, safety, and nuisance factors such as noise, odors, or industrial accidents. _ However, with the suggested changes, by staff, a negative declaration ` could be prepared as the above land use adverse impact would be ■itigatzd. V. FACTS FAR FINDINGS: In considering the proposed amendment to the Terra Vista Planned Community, the Planning Commission must make the following findings: 1. The amendment does not conflict with the land use policy of the General Plan, 2. The amendment doss promote the goals of the land use element, and �` 8 r Res tfuTly p fitted, Brad Bul er City Planner BB:NF:te 1 Attachments: Applicant's February 10, 1987 Letter Exhibit "A” - Latest Proposed Text from Lewis Homes for Business Park Overlay Zone Exhibit "B" - Proposed Designated Areas for Overlay Zone Exhibit "C" - Office, Commercial and Mixed Use Laid Uses Initial Study, Part II PLAN' XN & < .' REPOR TERRA VIN ' RCA COMMUNITY RME!�)MENT 86 -02 WESTERN PROPERTIES February 25, 1987 Page 9 Thedmeni would not �e materially injurious or ? ff- detrimental to adjacent p- operties hARRESPONOEi » 'phis is a continued public hearing it'e from October 8, 1986 ii ',,November 12, 1986, December 10, 1986, ana\February 11, 1987 regule`r # meetings. VII. RECOM ENDATIIItt. Staff recommends that the Manning Commissi'Nm conduct a public �. hi'l ing to review the proposed amendment, raceiik public input, and .orisider the following options: r 1. If the Commission cant, -t Support the facts for findings, a Resolution of Denial should be prepared adoption on the- nett Consent p „�xegdar t Agendyour j ,., 2. Should the Commission decide to consider th i proposed amendment and concurs with the recommen& Lions of staff, then the applicant should be dir�,pted to prepare,=_;- revised list of land Lses for the`Iusiness Park Overlay Zones. Upon receipt of the revised amendment, staff would prepare a Resolution of Approval for Planning Commission review on the next f available agenda as a consent calendar iUem. Res tfuTly p fitted, Brad Bul er City Planner BB:NF:te 1 Attachments: Applicant's February 10, 1987 Letter Exhibit "A” - Latest Proposed Text from Lewis Homes for Business Park Overlay Zone Exhibit "B" - Proposed Designated Areas for Overlay Zone Exhibit "C" - Office, Commercial and Mixed Use Laid Uses Initial Study, Part II y _ DELIVERY BY,MESSENGER _ .+ February 10, 1987 T Planning Division Attention: 'Ms. Nancy Fong. City of Rancho Cucir*"gnga 9320 -C Base tine Rer Rancho Cucamonga, "�D791730 1 , RE: TERM VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 86 -Ox - '.ERRA VISTA B?JSINE'S5 _ PARK Dear Nancy. Thank you for your r!vi`ew of our proposed Business Park Overlay 'Zone as set,:. fo.fta In the stxfreport of Dece:,ber 10, 1986. We wish to respond to the Analysis section (Section III )-- of the report as follows, using your subject headings and paragraph Numbers. A. Establishment of a Business Park Overlay Zone This Planned Go7,Aunity Amendment is the zone change that we seek for purposes of this zone. It shiald not, however, be construed to obliterate the underlying zone- -that zone is to remain. Our `. intent, with respect to the CUP procedure, is to afford the City ado,tional review and conditio,:'mg authority over proposed business park projects, so that each such project that is put before the City is subject to the requirements of that procedure: Exhibit C to your December 10 staff report correctly shows the areas which our proposal as currently written would make subject to the overlay. However, it is not our intention to apply the overlay indiscriminately to such a 'large area, and we hereby request that the Business Park Overlay Zone be re,_-t:ricted to the areas shown on the attached Development Plan, This restriction can be incorpa�ated in the community plan by language in the f' text, exhibit, o, both. B. Uses Permitted in Business Park Overiay Zone 1. No comment. C - - ". Planning Division_ - :° Februar ,- 10, IM7 Page 2 , 2 �t �s ra not the intent of this proposal to allow,. in the paragph which begins "Studios, stores, and . ", 1naust 41 uses; rather, we see the,; us:-,s listed here as tire1y appropriate within the context of the residential and Wsiness t, ,invironments that- -, will : characterize Terra Vista: tP, en effort to refineC die characteristics of the uses which will be permitted, we have again modified the language of this paragraph, 3. here, too, tie language' has again been r�io'iified in an effort # ,ka ensure 066t permitted uses will br appropriate to Terra Vista. W'4iti)hnally, we #have deleted hardware stores and we have Ate Kibit.;d autom6'bile upholstery. We believe the remainin'' uses; with the additional regulatalns afforded by the text changes, are entirely suitable for inclusion within ' Terra Vista.. r` 4. T? rimment. We also beliere,^ with respect to the Environmental Asessmen', section f, (Section IV) of the report, `hat with the ;ncorporatioo of these changes this proposal now merits a neg!:tiva declaration. ' Thank you very much for your continued interest and cooperation. u Cordially, , ?' �$ John R.Y Melc_ er Vice President /Project Development JRM:kr:514z �s Al LLI = c. a C c 0 J U- �¢ W U c° ch u L �+ > v ro' s LU sa n +:. Q LU 4. a LL- d III � 4�M V t;l ry I co N 0 6U Zn yy Ul 4 Y o _ _ z 3 s ' 41 4t Wi ci ti in to a y °C w UQ♦ to ccG� _- °' r" R . e io C cl � .L SI y vt �-) N O " a 6l y. ul a an a N C A $ '°' t, (A U. a tR to C , _ of -- O ra fi , • O C0 L. S] ro ;w Cl CSI.- h L L aiz c Ol yro > t4 Q. R C c :2 al ` Yates. v� myoa o as v 0 4Z U. CLy C 7C ut'.�� U�U �. > •q o. �♦ d 't7 to C f°. �• U ,� '� til •tJ A) tR vi s ° aam3� =o c v L�ro`^ jai a m �ma- E � 001 is . �y C c. ° tCO a u. 0 al V tt U to « S. ro m C U g i+ L.... L C' O CJ C "eat C °z m m 0 to - v C «• r ar L� av)v w a0i E y a o to CM .J 0C.U0aCZ jU.0 ��'c`t,,l. U CL0tnOO,' V x C a a N .,f] jfl.. •�.. N p. a! C ,C N Cv A in M N am>Eo i L C U w ;N tn .L > L a Uf a) Ln C E °`Y L m� me cf II m aa,o a + N N ti.. ° co ° a 0=tnp v a) p� G? w �u- Qo °m� lh co o o a > G U w c r r- -. to L tnpo° co °C.m�� to t OY CL N .0 N. 'L a) O X L to y c r R to .N w as cn CL m n N d U W a L. S O � �«- .t] 7 C L p1 d N %n L �_ 3 LA haJ.NL O0. ;l7�...V C i C u°sC•In C ' —u 5O0 OUmO��.aOc¢. O O Ol co C La '�. > COj L; R cc—=Cc O= L Q" X y _' m r- .a+ 0 O L X m n — to L Ot . o- 7 a. r ; O Ul a) ? O p1 ,N ii. c O 6 c U w L 'a ` w a O. w aa) t9 5:7 y a:+ a•` u U� a) L? D pl N p; ut G ° O 61 a O O E ., ;, O r L ,.,. C Cl tl,l O C W & tn a0+ Q. @ 171 al C m ° =+ •E N .N L O S) C = C U Ut '•• 3 C d C!„ y__, to p .'"''3 CA 4 'II aLi C $ u �. t) N s AM �. LU �roc',,� ^ >Cmw s�.u� W °'tn Q °�R E cu Q�, =�<Cu t-°- mOnmEa°�Oa «m tr-Q4 �,H� ¢ tip ._... _. se t� 7c�-RaN - L m� a¢y int- C itL3� u 0.G yo ,0,;; wRC CCN�O dN YN N N w R L N CROC3 R O OdL Ql CN. dm amc.i°"'o, gamo N a 4o V; y,Ry t `Nm y 7so —0 cmE N 'D a R Cum ILE ,u C CL CL n y N °° y a O ?y N m pU R a O O L fl. 3 a t g cB,. "' tom >.. cm NNC RO.m. M,>1Ri2•.¢ N «. N V. wUC. C !! 'n C'a � • N R L � . � .�±. R 3 CC y Ql a tv L CL R E. d co ��, . G.G y y d j :7 ;t -. m C m ,U E j :� a4.: y N C O O , N �., T e7 c .�.. Cl. .0 E•� L O C C C S s � v m� c ''' �° o BEd Q 1 mo 61.0.+_R a 3C U tNIIm L s0. :.+ E U L O,N L tO Q + 1 U ¢v 0 .0 aim F V �Ea-"o nR10 0.0 i4 N c V b z �ct•D. C 0mc coiy�N V a ��V. a V a y E C Rt .00 0 E E L U w�•s- u N I !. .+ 'a E ai m R °y s m �a vi L m L C a� a�i o cac' v FJI 4 �a.CCLLy in D CD 0 yyL7 y u w �CC C. tO N71n '\ N III. G Rl.•� N L L d �L�C�°m fn N N E= y a C y II@m a (A E mNmrn Lv �LO�m$aam�a j Faoa GRL ovr LCay yN' Oipy�w�Gl .^ N. aN.+ u•. C C1� N Cd1.G t y oa a 7 v •CL w C `'' �•y.. , 4.. C U '_" y, 3. a L C C -p w t O C L C y f'-. i E 0 R L O C O ..� C m R L •� N 3 N' U �y u y sooC vLCa sa Nv;:NNmwCL N a N 3 4! m C7 Z R °O's as Q.a <LO. 0 LO +�+ f > C o C.L a' - ttA41.dUUJZ4,�.UQCLL •+' Q R L R N..+N m O ci f 1 m, Qi! ED 1 2 o f, a r 1 1 i q 8 LU CL .e O OI Wat)v122h^ im dSwG s Qi! ED 1 2 o f, a r 1 1 i q 8 LU CL .e a c o E r Vl 9A O AOL `"- Vk L se a N y w A C 41 G N U° N w 3 V ~ � � w v E e N w c w i to s L al !. c� ® a L y :°. N N= hMH V ` Q d w n H Ys > v '" a ' n tn �` u 1 D,�' N :, N G' L g A i D .Ai tsC - ' v E a u E E m sr e A W E° a 43 41 Q N � ro W_ rr U N o •� rz ^J.. VGf a. O .Y O Q L. L. t p v y p CL L ry, n« a+ y V a N14 a+ N d C •L N dl « [ C O [ u . [ L C ja R V N 'O N iz V y� NC M E O .0 IA G d y 47 N C �0 U Gl 41L du �ti N L V L_ M N :3 N V O C > u 7[ U V J 81 N m tn la L L C �� 2 !; k �v on d (A o o� N L Lam+°- m� `gym U N L`3° -'c °v��cLas'7 `off v tQ [ L C d <_ta.�ta� ..� i y r:.:+ c of d R N fit: E 7 — L= N L v N wR+� aNV� F� _ c u Wiry ;r. f -o Ctof p Va co W ¢ U ¢N _ CE Q� �K� C W C. w cp ai G �. L C N 1$ . _ CJ a e. Eft t7m in C C L t 'A ro Ei VNi C7 Q1 L Off, N N Nay V j m O di g. 4) z v N O F O o O c r r s ® • o. AMML c tn ,, atn 1 m d N H v. cL1 to d t. aCr N:t CJ L p rj N a g ra LA tn c Ll L tv E y j p c s PJ 'n Q v N C. 6S7 A L a R v tn L u CJ N p L'1 N d U V' C V N 0 N N CT > c c in in v tn w N •O •p In 3 �.. a. C7 r _� 7 N Z p N C < C < J G O j 0-17 k CrT'I OF MNCgO CCC :'UNGa pA-ZT rr - x ITrA c5T( DY "' IRON' IE TAl CFECKLYST Y FILING � .. LOG NUMBER ° : I Z t ` PROJECT tw id1 6 rti4+ T rtF Nfd T �h §, BvTia PfiOJECT LOC.9TiONz t / :3 t Jas TiliAOdKt{ CCWt�� ?rsiN ?c Lis t> - PACTS ' T+G�r+4 %IT _ �fTAX (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe) answers are required sheets). on attached r �• YES KAYBE No I. Soils and Geology, Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships ?" b. Disru_�ions, displacements, compaction or burial; of the soil? ' c. Change in topography or ground surface r contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification + of any unique geologic or physical features? 1 e. Any potential increase in mind or water • erosion of soils, affect$ng either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the ra.% of extraction and /or use of anI mineral resource? 2. tiydro?oIX, Will the proposal have significant result: `,in: �_rg - I�f V G 3. Changes xn currents, or the course of direction Of flowing, streams,'rivers, _r `= or ephemeral nstream Chan strea ,r == b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of runoff ? surface stater �,• c. Alterations to the'eourse c.r flaw of flood waters? ; d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water ?. ` .. e. Discharge in t-* Surface Haters.,. or any al °.-r ation of surface stater .quality? - f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in Ede quantity of groundwaters, E either through direct additions or with - drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? quantity? L - h. The reduction in the amount of water other - wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to Water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air 4u_ a1ity, W 11 the proposal have significant results in: Constant or e9r.L0_c_1_ia air emissions from mouile or indirect souTces'? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? / c. A1te ^ation of local. or regional climatic Conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or tem.seiature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: Ank a• 'Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number u£ any species of plants? 6• ore ln of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants.? �/ a. '7 0 fil a, introduction of new or disruptive species_off: plants into an area? d. Reduction in the pgtett3al 1, �)r a'gricul-ural productior.? :aura. Will the proposal 'have significant results in: a."Q'Irhange in the characteristics of specie -, '?Including diversit} distribution, or nup*ers Of.Any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique; -rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new 6 , r dz-tuptive species of animals into an area, or r�r;ililt in a barrier to the t4gration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existlng fi !-j or wildlife habitat? tell" 5. Ponulation. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. V the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, de i msity, d-,ersit7, or growth rate of the the, populazAun of act area? L. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional;. housing? 6. Socio-E-Conomic Factors. Will the proposal have ':I&nificTnt results in. a. Changa in local or regional sor-io-economic characteristics, including economic or co=ercial div-4rsity, tax race, and property -values? b. Will project casts be -'quitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., 'buyers,, tax payers or project users? 7. Lard Use and Planni-nz ' Considerations. Will the proposal have sign. _. -a-t: results A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b.. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? C �n Izpact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or noti-cozsuzp <ivf recreat;r'�'�sit opfartv&_I ties? I' 0 $., Transportation. Will the proposal have significant " results in: _ a,. Generation of substantial additional vehicular mOVement� h. EffectJean existing streets, "�or demand for ": j new St e.t. construction? -- -• c, Effects on existing parking fac:Uities, or _• demand for np " parking? d..., Substantial , impact upon existing transporta- tion systems' e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/oz gooes? t• Alterations to or effects on present and Potential water - borne, rail, mass transit or air tratfL- g. Increases in traffic hazards" to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedest ^tans? 9, Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and/or historical resources? 10. Health, Safety, and Nuisz'�ce Fa:tors. Will the proposal rave significant est;tts in:" a. Creation of any health hazat'4 or potential health hazard? T' b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c• A risk of explosion or release of hazardous i substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic r,rganisms or the exposure of ,,eopL_ to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f• F )Osure of people to potentially dangerous 4se levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? -A 'Al. Aesthetics. Wtll the proposal have significant results in- '\a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic ` vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c• A conflict with the objective of designated ,a► or potential scenic corridors? ✓ 12.. liriities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b. Natural vz packaged gas? c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? _ e. Wastewater R �aciiitiles3 - - _ - ? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities?� h. Fire protection? I i. Police protection? _ J. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1, Maintenance of public facilities, including ',:id roads flood control facilities? W. Other governmental,services? 13. Enerev and Scarce ° =s�;u +!test Will '.he proposal, have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon uxisting sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the con ^umption of non - renewable fcrms`'of energy, whet '�easibld'% renewable sources of energy are available? r/ ' "�4'.sx°a'S— z-v-.� pF 1, YES No e. ,Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce naat, al resoprca_? 14. tFandatorr -inddn of Sitnificahce. a. 'Does the p^roje•ct haV* the _potential to de ride' the quality of tht OP*i9'xa!nment, substantially reduce the habit of fisU or vildlife species, cause a f {„h at Wild on ifc populati to drop l .beow self tannin Le „� � V'R13, threaten to - eliminate a plant or „animal wait}, reduce = the number or re$trict the range of a rare or l endanger plater of arrimxl 4►r eliminate ': mportant�;�tampl s of the major: perlads of : ifortiia history ar Frktistory? f -- b, I Does the project Lave he po=tential to a,chieve41 y *port- term, to iii die ivantage of long-term, t1' environmental goals? A short -tern, iact on the environment is On( which occurs brief, definitive period of time ler.,cle long- _ tea itkpa �s will endure well into the future). ,! Ay O c. Does the pzOel have impacts which are indiN� dually invited, I but cumulatively cons . gable (Cumulatively cans d V=ble r., means chat eh i=_ l effecd. of an individual project area ider3b3e trhezi viewed in connection Zh the effects of past projects, and Probable future projects).7t d. Does the project have envirana;ncal effeKs which will cause subsiag -a - T_; sdversf, effects on human beings, either dir`sctlyr i�.3irectly? _ II, DISC SSION OF EMR 0% .C.M IrIAL (i.e., of affix ative answers to the above questions plus a`disritssa_, of proposed mitigation measu^ zs)., E 4 On the basis of this initial eralu4lon: G - 1 I find the proposed project CDCI.a ,40T, have a. significant e; °ect r 'on the enviro=,ent, and a 1'EC:.TIVE DECLn.R,3TL,c%!t will be prepared, c> 11 i ,; I find that, although the pv o ed project u here a signiiiscan effect on the e=17ixanmen' , - neYe will not L'e a significant effect in leis case because the'mitigatton t'easures desccibPd ar. an at s, fed sheet,,bave fir -4n added to I�t2 A, kro,ject, A 'XCyTIfE ` i3Ei2�i t7Y RILL B8 PE~PARED. ;t I find t 3;e. "pragaser grgaact SAY ve a significant effect.on the e7. iMaent, and ,aru is regai #�d. Bat€ •► � < �- - ^- - -� � - ' ` i. r tur Title N / ��.. `.. 1 ! 1 711 ATTENDED NOVEABER 20 19zT$' AWL AWENDUM TO '- INITIAL STUDY, PART °fI , FOR TERRA VISTA, PLA MED COMMUNITY AMENDMEUt 86 -02 i.4h Use and Planing °Considerations (a) (b) a) �SubstantiaY, alterations of a planniA land use of an area.- ; �t The proposed amendment would allow lighC, irdustr.ai development in, a residentially planned,'community. i,In addition to -the base Uses established in each „of the zoning districts, the Susiness Park overlay Zone would permit su #h lend uses' as custom manufacturing, 4ertain reteil and service types of land - use such as hardware stores, -television and radio sales and repair, fool and oeverage sales, baebdr. and beauty shops f cxhibVl "B”, wows potenti•3l areas within the Pranned Community wf ere` a Busies Park Overlay loge could be requested. The propdsW to° a84)w custom manufactd,4ng type of land dse would :ot be �onsisten:_with the intent'o the Terra Vista Comm' ty Pl an or 04e , Ci ty' c .Gevleral P1 an. Further., such uses zoui d create .,land use compatibility ca'nfl.icts macho noise, odor, light p�4vacy, aesthetic, access 3r►d safety. The Terra Yista, Planned Cc�mm'Wty; is conceit-id as a series of residential 7eighborhoods , nl,r �tv,`ether by common recreational , and institutional functions. ,Planned Development is dividad into four neighborhoods wil 4g two psrtherly neighborhoods more residentially orient/ _ le the ' southern neighborhoods`.,; have a higher proportion i,_,_runit devoted to commercial and mixed uses. The purpose:' of •this commercially, zoned area of_ Church Street is:to provide transition uses to the industrial area • south of Foothill Boulevard. and transition to the Residential` Districts north of C"urch. Street.` The proposal to allow industrial uses within Terra Vista is contrary to the fm,AAmenta> t(ave of zoning; incompatible land uses should be si per _t,*d to, avoid nai sang P. Further, it wool d erode "Te intent yt J.e TP -d Vista" Planned Community and not oe in-the best interes;.:.f the City of Rancho Cucamonga'. b) Inconsistency Wth General Plan and felat -� nship to the Industrial Specific Plan. The City adopted the General Plan in 1981 with the pdrpose of setting forth broad community goals to guide the C;ty- -.in' managing nffeo"tively the" cmplet integration of physical, so- -vial, culture and economic :;growth. These broad community goals err translated into spec"fic policy statements. and . specify, m4asures to accomplish the object?ves of the Plan. Some of the `4,ectlke policy statements established in tad Land Use Elemen that: }5 �o Land, use s ald be organized to avoid creating,_ nuisances among o i,�,cent Iand uses. ` o Industrial development shori'ld be coordinAed ' tr1 x►caurage and ink r industrial ar�,l :ritii' the maximm flexib l� and access ,to a regional circalatior, network. The Industrial - 'Specific Plan nrovides,,near3y 4,000 acces�of. developable land chat is properly zoned for the type of uses proposed.', AlTow1hg industrial uses ,away from the indac;triai Specific Plan area haunoa,-Y = would erode tke intent of this Industrial � pbcific�ti`plan.,, The Amen r ent: Jo id tiso a11ow �V ' certai,' Lbmmercia i�se5 within the usioess Nrk Overlay ;, "Zone. These uses include small, busi,riess retail and servive, s \ uses, such as a 3ian6j stares and repair, plukoing shops aria ,. pfloor f supplies, teleMllon`_'and rarlo sales and repair, ' covering sales and �insluallatian.; hardware stores, catering e;abTshments and similar businesses, eonveniertce retail and service businesses such as 'food and be�ce -age sales and newsstands. in essence, this woaid expand commeeCidl land ue6 into acres not,-intended ,'icr•'+hdse typos of dss. This would confl;t w ?x!f City -wi de regal ati ens of ' tiv l 0evhl op ant Cody. 'arid General`Plan which establish a ��dreful "bilance of commercial, , industrial lane office and reside /�-Tal uses. ` Transportation (a) 1W One of the. obvectives,`of the T?rri Viq,E.a Planned Coimunity"is to devalop ar extensivz greenway s t,:e rr with trails, bikeways -1,nd j sidMlks, allowing community residents,- to eliminate s&.ia autom6hile trips. The development of indL4-trial projects wom cause an increase in- trur?: traffic,. whV.11 -.)uld inGred`se the potential hazard to - esidertialCj8nerated auto traffic, bicyclist and pedestrian.' Health, Safety and Nuisance'ractors ibl, (c). 4e1. (91 The proposed amendment to add industrial uses in a residentially _ planned community could have cumulative adverse impacts to adjacent residents in area! of noise, odor, light and glare. a .I cgs I a, 0 (I CITY ©P R A&HO GUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 28,° 1987 0 TO: Chairtal, and Members ct; the Planning Comp ssion 1477 FROM: Brad .Buller, City Planner. BY. Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSE (RFP) FOR'TRAILS STUDY I. ABSTRAL:T. ' The Pl6ining Commission is to review and consider the Req',est For Proposal drafted , by the Comnit�y+ Services Department that _was:? prepared to solf-At consultants to prepare W Tra0s ,Study \es authorized by tGe City Council. j''3 Comrission`s comments will, `oe forwarded to the City Council fear-iheir consideration as they take final action on the RFP. II BACKGROUND This RFP has been reviewed by the Trptt-�_Advisory`ComWttee at their meetings of both January 21 and February'Cj 19871 TW4 Trails' Committee has recowndEd adoption of the RFP. Minutes -'of the Trays Committee leeetisigs are attached for your ri4iert. The RFP has also beon rreviewid,,;by the Parks ssion at their meeting of February 18, 1987. ThA iLOP is now being presented to the rxmning Cmm fission for their review an consideration prior to forwarding of the docts -,mit to the City I-,- ci/!l for final consideration. III. RECWEHaQ%fVN: Staff re „p t..sts that the Planning Comnrissian review this document and pro -64.i comment about its content, in particular the scope of the Trails Study. Your comments will be,forwarded to the City Couvrci' as they review ,;his document for final action. No formal Resolution of Adgntlon is wessary by the CommissioA, your comments *.'ill be forwarded to the City Council ,through' minute j action. I s ctfu= ”' r' , I P City annex BB:BC:te Attachments: Requestor Proposal Trail Advisory Com dttee Hinutes. January- 21 and February 4, 1987 ITEM R i PROJECT 0 SCRIPTT0K. Review and discussion of rev,sed RFP,,for_the 1 _— Trails Study. 1� J F1WRJAIZ1 A. I947 Staff present: Btu COOK, IGiREN MCGUIRE- RY° BILL 14OLLLY, HRW BULLEP ommittee,members: CHRISTINE HENOIr° FJ6M SSUES: „ PETER TOLSTOY.. SUZANNE, �LiTICA At the Trails meeting of January 21, 19 the Committee., reviewed and discussed the dvaft RFP prepared by the £a unity Service Department for solicitation of a cortultart to prepare the Traits Study.•At that time several suggestions were made on.items that the Committee felt should 'included be into the RFP. The Community Sirvices Department has prepared a revised RFP based on this input, and has submitted it tp the .Committee members for further review; ACTION= T?='TRAILS COMMITTEE MS'REVFEHED THS FWVISED RFP ,MID HAM ACCOMMItNogij ITS ADOPTiON WITH 'INE FOLLCRTING WOOIFICATIONff : 0 t . IN, 7HE PRZITACE FOR ^XQUXS'I' FOR PItUPOSAL, 77H FARAQgAP14 ' CHANT$ '' ALMOND TRAY e' TO "BLECHWoDH TRAIL.., 2. UNDER EXRIBIT "A'' . I ii. SPECIFIC IIdpMjE'NTATICN : Aj REVISE STS BULLET TO READ: — *wwERE REQUIRED: PROPERTY SUMFy' METHODS OF LAID ACQUISTfOW, RIGIiT�Or -WAY. IM POTENTiAL JOINT .{, AGREENEWM „,,.,, B) R:ViSE 6TH I -AXLET TO READ • , mAINTENANce GUIDELIN�L r SCH6Dt91 m, ENFORCEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF TRAIL EASEMENTS, AND COST ANALYSIS' Cj ADD PEII BULLET To -READ :•'DEVELOP A COST FORMULA FOR ANNUAL BUDGETARY ANALYSIS OF SPECiAL TRAIL LINKAGES. Ts TRAILS COMHl IYEt3 RECOMMENDED NOV To IR'C'UDE THE I979 TRAiLS STUDY AS FART OF Ti F RFP OUT OF CCNCER'"t THAT THE pURp= OF THE RFP I5 THE CONSULTANT 7ELLiT40 TF•iE CITY WHAT Try PROSLEMS-'AIE AND WfAT NEEDS To BE ` RATHER 9TiAN VICE VERSA. j Q E$ N dU:ltF(,56W 'ccmdtlTm C� S T ti t IGCT1 RFIV D'tSCtF fCt or :'REVIozc RRP 3� FOIt TIiI: 7�141LSn $'ey` F[ 13RLlAFIY x ` I997 IN REG RW "t'C THIS [SSUk, �IW 69It!!=IT'Itt ALRO,IVOWD THE FOLLOWING: A�iefidYSt: t j 7i#E 7RAILs GOO�1'171= WNII S TO IITCITItiN,E[dYgf.:tED tN TFpE '1ARFE5'•. TCft7Y ocE r.{u{',xcu.D INCLUDE mIm tldi ve IFa` ma:>� i'lit 3EL�CTtON OF TIC Ctxasrx.T C kN F1AYitiG INPUT AS To 1jlFA > ui.0 iNCLLJS�EY? IN THE FIN.JtL FI¢DtiRAssl: =HAT I•S CCNFTRAC'GCD. - COSWIT M woot.D h_ %LSD Z� lm 'fo W FtItPr •L1PPAIM TO TW STJkn= Or TIC STWy r,.mcFtya THE C cw 11's cmrtj,? loo. 2). TFTE 'CCMETTM FgW S TWAT AN If4P01VI'A%r Cr TO Or INCi.tBt]i£D AS PAW- OP' "M STtMr tS To COMLC! A Sir CF 161L SURFACIme STAWAFM THAT CAFI'ag CCNSt 1TLY ATp.TRD To AI,L'.TRAILS TO V4SUW A QUALITY TRAIL Wii7 M Xl .4* '4W USKFO CAN CaTAtt+I A: P XASURA LE RtDltW E)WZRIKNLE. S) .ANOTWR IWCAT.Wr ASPSCT T9 M IN=i=D AS ` Al VAOr Or!- '!RAILS', 5RJ7Y I&A C TAILED SILWgr :7r TM TRAIL SYSTEM AS IS QL( TS.Y 114 �tr PLACE AND It6WtVrtlCATt0K OW h'3ctSTlOG, PROMOM, I .E... M138tft r i SEGMEE NIS. W—OCKM gA9�k.U9CIe1m. UN44'(�" Fi6kImD 1d4k�: TH TRAYS 57LES5e SHOULD 1= GNTY 6f FIi'.URK EXPAN$KK Td$ SirS7IEIi, tglpq 9tiOULU AIIS.}.,,;.At y9 E IDMIti3?IF'tFL - PIMS600r. WITHIN Tw MSTIKO ' i ,• GIYST M AYs7 T19 iI` 1IAY:S tW3F 't'1 1,*WL.El�ffiS To ATom 'TSIE TRAIL S1'STsAI %OF*,. I. can �f �t�� r�L,+ MMS ail ssa.�i Aj) +r jSoR a ICO ud T EE' 3 PROJECT DEcCBiP3tt)k� . RCVIMW AND DtSCU3StON of • -REQ(XZ ' rM ....OPC'�IAL WV rr6t Ca^ 7Y sxs>ivlcla� c£PC.itINCN9r ARH #tt£ pl [• a OP" „so6;ICiT PROFAIALS FOK 1W PREPARAT1ON OF A CcMrAw Jat-vG CiTY•53AEC TIRAILS 'Tway, ` JANUARY 23, 190'1! - ...... '' STA!F F! ” tiP; s8l4UL COOK, KAREN MCGUt1M•1E 1 V COLP4II'1f' = MIS PPKS M: SUS CF MEA, PA1I IB:IW, CMISTINE CIENO'"T �GTION• _ 7t0E TRAILS CI MMdTTEE HAS IMtIYRED THE 1=4UEST FOIR PffqPMAL 40 E4SA8S SU- IMSRYD 71-a FObLOVINR - VNLKR' * sr „5. 1) A SMCIFIC T' Mir Py,% E FOR C6MLr. -IOr4 QF T*W STUDY &:"b Be tNDICA7iCD. 1, £G. 1&0 MAYS. ' z j ANAVISIS CW hKTt!=LaoIZS . OF: REYIEWlt" Dg,:TZLOIWM pioJECTS TO RA°09LF RECOMA! 44NTS FOR TRAM IMPROMMeNTS. 'iii, JtWALLAT 1CN OF TRAIL !bier 'AM M <I INLK9 MAID OF 7AAM t 21HOULC = .ACZtLMMa Alb PAwr OF TIC TIMILS STUCV. 7HI8' MAY INBX.Um M, EXAMINATION OF Mw OTHER JCIRISUICTt,-*n AMIK'!!'"M AWA MMITOR A TMLS SYSIMM. Alftk 31 THR TRAILS STC,W °SH09. M INCLUDE A, PF(A.Rlms acmm" 01► HOW LONG IT wo"o VAKE TO IMMMb1ENT TIM VARIOUS ELZMF-* TS 6i **a STUDY. 41 THIC VAITIOUS LEGAL F —lMCTS OF THE CITY REQUIRING A TRAILS -- M7T:Rd 5H''119.0 HE ADDRIMITD AND FO7PFAIWD. 71.113 WOL O INCLUDE ISSUit3 Gs tuVINC. Issues LIASILI7'Y, KSTHOD6 OF INSTALLATION AND ME7M= OF CST e- VNMMIID MAIN EMANC£. 31 THEM SHOULD BE AN OPENING NAmRATIvM IN THE P,,,4= TINO .Rtl OVAtIlwy MW OF Tim SITUATtcN %ANSI BAC2C"+ROUNV To TER IS9tX5/P jDM OF TRAILS WITHM Rntjca4t CUCA Im. POTENTIAL RESPONDENTS SHOULD are i ",vl LS WITH COPIES OF THE PERTIl6i W SECTIONS OF 71-AC QMWFAL Pi-Vi AM - D'CWL O *4C" CMM. AM WITH PAST ,TTtk j L STUDIES TO HIt1.P H oVi re ADCWA7E HISTORY TO 7M PLACE AND PRW- V£CTIVC OF TFA?LS WITHIN TjE CIt . Z) THE RFP SHOULD 1tMICILTE TI'!kT AN INITIAL COMaONIMr cW THE TRAas STUDY TILL BE A SUAI EY OF EXIST(,,,Vq COWITI'LMS TO tVENTIFt AG TO WHAT ACTUALLY EXISTS IN 71F!£ FIELti. 7) TIC RFP SHOULD CG,ARIrY TEA£ PURPOSES OF TRAILS W,!.H.-tC '14IE CITY, Er.. THAT Te3ASL3 ARE TO Be MMT"PLWO5% VCR USF' FOR HIKIM, 'BIKING, JOGGING. £QMST'RI AN, ...TC. 6) A CCGT ATa !,YStS OF IMPLEIl±'NTING lIARIlyW EL&MKNM or THE TRAM 5.mx SHOULD NOT ONLY BE PROJICEP, BUT S¢+O&M BE BROMN DMN TO PRMICE INJIYICUALI7_€10_CGST ACCOUNTING FOR SlmtrlfrtC SLM- COK-'MMNT`:4'WITH1N FAQ-1 ELEmNT. fir`, F. %111 I VIV SWUM %14 IU CU%4A.MQN%YA \t STAFF REPORT \\' _ Dai'Q 76bruaTY 19, 1987 , To: Park Devolopment,e msission From: Karen McGuire-- Z-aRxy * "' kNas.istaint Park Pla nnar Subject: Trails Otudy ea� :st par, Proposal adotio11 That the nark Development COMMixsion - ::evi*v the attached Requeai�. for Proposal EOr the Trail SMplextoaxtation Study and recoomend t",.at it be ,,oxCard*d. to City Council for revie4 and :.pproval . �c3sarQ�t�. -_ At the 'recTlest, of the Planning yommisn'Idn, i -- nugwit of. 198th the City council: authorized. the Comarnitg Ser ,,es Department to prepa�ra a Requests for Proposal (PXP) to ample tesJt a comprahenaive trail study. Since that time, the RFP luau been preparrd by the Community Servi ae s Aapazt-� ant and reviewed and - appri4od; by the Planning Division, Engineering Division, and the Sque;e €trim Advisory Committers. once the W71 is approved and distributed, a base committee will be assembled to eveluate this proposals reca - ?ed. This - aoi ,ante s rent be made up of one Planning Commission Nember, one Park D6velopm®at Com scion number, one Co=unity Devaslopmart planning Staff-Me mber, and one Covaunity Services Department.Starf member. UPOn selection of a consultant, a broader lease committae will be formed to work with the consultant in formulating the actual trail plan. This committee is likely to include members from the eexistln4 :k questrian Trails Co= ttea, bicyclists, hikars, as wall non-trail - users. 3 tI Becauss the Trails Implementation Study,,,is a "Joint", prof e of the Park, Ttevelopgant Commissiarn and the Planning Commissio the ,Request' Vor Proposal will also be slated on the a2ganda. for Planning `commission review prior to being dk� ected to gity Council,. C, i I AML nit U XX, 1987 xXXXXXXXx Attns :. subjsat: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TRAIL STUDY ' I. In roduQt _ This Re Prg osal RFP Request solicit for- p t 9 is bsinc� r,�i,�sed to " ptopossle from qualified., Consultants for a comprehensive trails study for Via Cit: of RalIcito Cucamonga,- deocribed in Exhibit TAII ,�, -Sg4 services. The trails study is b'ain„' fuzlilI. solely by the City oZ Rancho Micamonga. 'r' II. Contractua 34aauire,�w;p{;� ' , The Consu tant_ selected for thin prnjel Ct would be required to sign a contract for- pea±tormance of services. The contract: will be sub- tantt� ally, similar f' in„ form and dontgmt to the sample, IXhib t_ "Dre Prcfersiont � eryi a esnAet2t. $ '\ .III.: � 61308�i�. Rp�,µi�c+agnt:o A. E - : I proposal submitted in respot ae to this _ RFP noxll rdCress the ,informs Lion as follows on a point by point basics: 1. Describe your company in terms of Taistory, staff expeitienc�s, and training, with Particular /lughasis on, and identification of, the irdividuala who will work on this project and their specific role:, with the projet t. 9320 BASLLDMROAM SUITE C CIMCE bOX $W w RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUTWORNIA91M a (114)OWAIS1 ld Request for proposes \ = Xxr, 1987 `.:_.. A�ags two 2. Describe your coiapa3iy in terms of past experience in trail design.., with location examples, 4i as well as _, ai y studies which your company ,'has undoirtaken of a similar nature to 3. Liss at lease three (3) former c: L� is for -r whom comparabldi services have been performed ' within the.-.last' five (a) years. Inalndo the 'l name, mailing address, and telephone number of each client Ia principal:-' representative. 4. Describe your company's normal research Procedures Wid review process,., t 51, Describe your a�,�proach to this V�oject, i.e., establishing the time: fripaa fot the project ' phases as described in Exhibit ►'13 ",:e t schedule... B. Each proposal submitted in. response to this RFP shall address Exhibit "c ", CQarMs for Consulting Services, listing the total fee for serv,;..:es for completion of the project as described in Exhibit IB"`, pra�er�t Svhedule, and a description of the Consultant's fee Achedule, as well as an hourly fee. for Design Consultation once implementation of the 'Trail Program has begun. C. Fitas interested in responding to this request must submit eight (a), copies of their proposal to: Community Services 'Department, City of Rancho Cucamonga, P.O., B&: 307, Rancho Cucaaonga, California 91730 Attention: Trail 6tudy, Proposals not received by the City through the postal system or by personal delivery prior to 5:00 p.m., on xxxxxxxxxxx xx, 1987, will not be i considered. D. The City of Rancho cacamonga will host a question and answer session for all interested parties regarding the Trail Study. This meeting will be held at 2:00 p.;n., xxxxxxxxxxx, February xxx, 1987 at Lions Park Community Centei:, 9161 raseline _ Road, Request for Propos " xa6cCCx Xac, 1957 Page three IV. Prot @CitlY ems` r @i @ i1C QpngLi *aNt i J PrOP*** -! a Subr -Itt4d will' be ,. / a aV tswed anC! t]1Q" erogt: air' whioh `Most clearly alit' ' with the Cit. paroe,Bf of the prefect w 1I . ba Invited to The results 64 those interviews J1 hs fc t ,ed, to or the City vr Council freview and Swax�tC'of eont t---.4�J The City reserves the right to reject. `� an proposal and 4 s City of Rancho Cucamonga W.L. Holley, Director Community Service--t Department r f _. _ $�txLtes,rr pranasa Rancho C11✓14;tonga serail T_tapiemsntat34n Study t� The City Of Revicho Ck camonga, 'situated in the southwest: e:orner at San Bernardino Cou.�ty, is 37 males east, Of, downtown T,os Angaj;as and 1�5 miles - West of downtown San Baridardino•, The San Gabri,+l Mountains rise majestically to thet north and the co=unities of Upland, Ontario, and -Fontana guzround the, City on tho West, south, and easitr respectively. Tnoorpordt9d in 1977, Rancho Cucamonga began itmtaediately an extensive ,.ammunity based general plan development -program, culrainaring` ?.n 1981 with the `City CO."-3Y►cills adoption of the General Pian far �e � +° � C�„�amorxcr„a.� Ourirxg the process -)t davela ng- the G+aneral plan, it became appatent, that trhe cazamuzaity placed a very strong priority cars ,Teen spatce and the prov40ion of Weil. thought out recreational amenities and facili:was. one such priority concerrad insuring that a. network of trails that would benefit pedestrian, bic; cl.er and Oquestrian users be included in the Cityvs plans. This i enclosure) ssuer �„as addressed ayad is contained in the General Plan on pages 110 through 114 Ease While the Cenaril Plan lays Out a sstronq ebja: ,�t!,,ve and well stat!sd policies in this area, a campreisensive iaagtementatian plan is needed :o brine the objective to fruition. That is the purPose of this prrje ;... to areat�i a very specific cueratizq, plan, which addresses in ve " -Y wp ;;lic ways, ttmt impl,emeniz, ion of the trail, system, For exaa4pls, one Stich Gentaral. Plan identified trail is the Beachwood Trail,. It travels east tcaward west and is use4 primarily by joggers and equestrians. There is h ,)waver, a blockage in the trail, Oreated by one lot, due tw an uncoordirataA pro-incorporation Zesidential housing tract approval. * , specifically should that- he resolved? Moving fury er east we may find at grads roast. cros5iings. How specifically shOUld the czosaing be made? What texture for the surface; Vha+: kind of signage and how far away exactly for each such cro,,. -j- .ng? In ether words, the City of Rancho vacaZonga i . requas, r, 7r ai proposal, for puttincr toq�ather the 'plait's and for the building a comprehensive =ltii -url trail system,. 0701-02 0 2`-25' -87 PC Agenda 5 EXHIBIT "M E - SCOPB OF SIM= The service$rto be rendered by the CONSULTANT small include the r' following: t. �Ft €search And Ana 3 Ye o the $" std nn �Prx f a Tsui vi.�,� i The C09SULTANT shall be responsible for collection, generation and analysis of relevant Information necessary to proviOe an u15 to date, comprshersive description of t,,e study area. This portion of the study shall include, buts not ba li-mited to: i o A comprehensive Trail Survey of the existing trail components throughout the city: o Regional Multi -PU rpose Trails 0 Comz=, ity :rails I' s o Local f,�,indar Trails o Review' Of the Trail user groups within the city, both V rren..t and future, including equestrian, -riders, I'lil e:rs, Jo5*Yers and bicyclists. o Research, review and -possible supplement of the existing Policy Statements and Development Guidelines of the General Plan regarding trails to reflect the City's; increase in development and recreationists in .":.tder to accomplish the objecti - ;e previously stated. IT. ?d'tGthodoT ooi% O1° 7mn7 aener�d -a1 -q nn A methodology for the imt4lpmentation of ties city FQ1icy an Trails as developers in Segment 1, to accomplish a comprehensive and interconnectea Trail System, including, but not Limited to., i o_ A Master plan ce the existinS, trail components and linkages With the Proposed trails in areas of futt�re' devei <) pmant for each trail component. ` ' rl o The conditions for development of these new ira ;fls includi -nT pricritg Tof installation and feasibility and legality of property acquisition and <. developments o An anticipated cast a {timlate -Or -accomplishing each :of the three- separate f components: o Regional Multi - purpose Trails o Community Trails o Local fteder Trails III SoeCi i r T.1s+mm -v4�� 3-Plan I Development of a Comprehensive Trail rmp ementation PI an s± rlld provide a detailed mastarplan and related working drawings as res 4ruired a continuous system of integrated tr«ijs throughout r the City basso on the three trail aoidpnnents: o Regional Mult'L -4 rpcse Trail o Community Trails c Local Feeder Trails Tile ;Vecific it rplamentation plan should include, but nor be limit6d toe o 'zee precise alignment, design standards and specifICAions for each of the proposed trails, providing linkages, interconnections and incorporating improvements of the exAl sting trails where necessary. o Where required provide: Prsperty survey, methods of land acquisition, right -o*_' -way, and potential joint use agreements. including but not limited tot j o Eroperty, acqutistioxt o Trail construction c Maintenance and enforcement procedures o staffing requirements, o Developaaent of a cost formula for annual bugets�y analysis of specific trail linkages. Note: i A. The CONSULTANT Sa X11 deliver to the'CITY full completed, reproducible working drawings, details and specifications; which shall become the property of the CITY. S. All working drawings shall be drawn in ink on mylar. C. The specifications, and any other written material fray text format, shall be typewritten, and furnished in such form, that they may be duplicated on standard office copiers. D. Prior to final delivery of the dtrawings to the CITY, the CONSULTANT shall furnish xequ4xed copies of drawings that may be required for plan check, building permit, etc. E. Upon approval of the final prOeUct by the CITY, the CONSULTANT shall deliver a minimum cf 25 copies and shall provide the CITY with a reproducible master copy of the final product. JJ" a a Maintenance guidelines, s ^hedules, cost analysis a well as enforcement proceed eq; and. maintenance of trail easements. � o Availability of innovative financial resources for � - t trail development - possibly at the local:., - state ;z or federal level. C` o o A complete itemized, detailed cost an fay zcomplising each major section of the three trail components to provide art integrated trail system . ` G,' The CITY will furnish copies of all drawings and specificatior.G required for bidders, contractors and fob construction, H. The ,�Tity shall, provide CoNS"TANT with all necessary background material, including last not limiter to: Gmmo al ' Plan Dsvelopment Code, Trail Survey Map ;' EgUpat;;ian Trail Design Guidelines. and any other psrtifint ,nlormation relating to the study, _ s +r' i i r �i r Work on the pRtkjTze,,,.!1. is Qxpecfied to co;ZMence with ir. a short tame ;j after selection 17' a C9N5tTTTAN'T- Cam21etioh of the plan is anticipated within, 'a vox-manth time frames. 3i In the followiri� section, clearly 4efine the scope of work proposed to accomplish the project. please include estimated time to complete all "phases of to�v project, listing any and ail procedures, development pies, :naps, surveys. plan- doeumInts, technical reports, reai�nge and oral preaentations for 'each project sdgment' I ReeearCh and I{'2 alk :-a _ EXfiTHIfi M��t �% z ex tc�� FOR The CONSULsANS Will aCcomplish the pat3cha CucamangA Trails ;., implem ation. study in accaxdanee with Sxhibitf Schadule, for the following tees: X: Research and Analysis and II. Methodology ot; lmplementatioxt i2 Specific Implementation Plan 1! , p Imp P Regional Multi- Purpose Trails community TrItila $ it focal reader Trails S Total Add tion3l servicss,' 3ncZu33ng nAesig�t Conaultation'r will be billed, at the following rates: EXHIBIT IV, c PROFESSIONAL SERVICZS AGREEMENT 1 This Agreement: is made and ent'red into this day of , 19_ 1 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY'S) and (hereinafter referred to as "cowsuLTANT1°). A. Recitals. (z) CITY has heretofore issued its Request` for Proposal pertaining to the per2ormance of professional, services with respect to the preparation ("Project" hereafter) . CONSYLTANT has now submitted its Proposal, for the performance oe ypxch services. (iii) CITY desires to retain CONst TANT to perform Alfth Professional services neoessary to render advice and assistzZCe to CITY, CITY's 'Planning Commission, City council and .staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to Perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NOW, THZRE oRE, it is agrE. ad by and betLreen CITY and CONSUhTANT as follows. B. Agreement. 1. Definitions• The, following definitions r shall apply to the following terms, e=ept where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: (a) RX9±2-ctl The preparation of describert 'n exhibit Swope of Services hereto including, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such Jmk plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to CITY as required ze and attendance at any and all wark sessions, public hearings and other, meetings ccnducted by CITY with respect to the project as outlined in the Scope of Services. (b) Tue C.guncil: Shall mean the city council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Council is the governing i body of the city. (c) Thr, Director: Shall mean the Director a,f k Community Services for the City of Rancho Cucamonga., authorized by the Council to renressnt, the City in matters pertaining to the Project. (d) Se*_ -eggs: Such professional services as r are necessary to be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the proj act. (e) ,Coma etian o Proiec°.• Thr3 date of completion of all phases of the project; including, any and all procedures, development plans, maps, 'surveys, plz documents, technical reports, meatilgs, oral presentation3 and tucandance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project..acceptanc for construction is set forth, in Exhibit 10$" Project Schedule attached hereto. 2. CONSV=&N_- aCtees as follows • (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordance with Exhibit "A" and applicable with Federal, State and CITY statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULVANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents ") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit "'A" to CITY within the time specified in Project Schedule, Exhibit "13". Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit "A ". CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents in such form an 4 - _Z_ , in the quantia.es determined; necessary. by CITY41 The time limits set forth pursuant, ro this Seztion 82. may jai extended upon a written approval at) CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTAN 's sole cost and expense,, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms J of this Agreement. ''In the event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants ,that such persons sha : %I be fully qualified to perform services required _ hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees thit no subconuractor shall be retiLined by CONiSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY aarees as follow (a) To pay CONSULTANT m+ximum sum of for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff_, and .time all other direct and indirect Costs or fees, ind',1,'4A:Lng chL- work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in 4(:=Ordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, an a mu.%thly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are re mived by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit "C" either with respect to 3 hourl ;* rates or lump sua amounts for individual tasks. In no event, however, will said invoices exceed 91.1% of individual task totals described in Exhibits "A" and "C ". (c) CONSULT-ART agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 951 of the maximum payable heraunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final locuments, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final pays snt shall .be made not lat?r than 60 days after presentation of final documents and accep`r:ca thereof by CITY,. I I (d) Additional ti as: Paymerms fo additional services requested, in writin4,. by Cr_Ty, and not included in ene Scope of Services as _set forth:° ,in Exhihit' �rAn hereof, shall be paid on a reimbuzlament basis in accordance•, with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "W'. Charges fog,* additionai services skull be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be pai -, by CIV within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. 4. g„to Mrovide to CW$�UTTANm: (a). Information and assistance as set forth in exhibit "ATM herato. (b) Photographically yaprodzcibla copies of maps and other information,- if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to complete the project. (c) Such information as is ganarally available from CITY files applicable to the priject. (d) Assistanca, if necogssury, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and/a= privat parties., However, it shall be CONSULTAN'T'S responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. Ownersain of 09auments. ._1 documents, data, studies, surveys, dravings, mapa, models, photographs and reports prepared, by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTzwT,, such documents: and other i.dentisiad materials shall be delivered to CITL by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT, may however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at tha site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written; consent of the CONHVLTANT shall 'be at the sole risk of t el CITY. The CITE, -4.. r w 'indemn agrees to hold harmless and -y the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims and losses including defense costs arising out of < any such alteratzton or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CTT'.C, its staff or authorized agents. f. Termination.- This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written 'cNotice of T-rminaticn" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (1S) days prior to the date of termination specified in said NOt,4.ce In the event thi�;Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be. compensated at CONEULTANT s applicable hourly rates as set forth_,42v mxhibit "C ", on a prorata basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of terMination. 2n no event, however, Shall CONSULTANT receive nitre than the maxi.%Um specified in paragraph 3 Q -1, above.' CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all doc=ei!ts,J data, studies,C, surveys, drawings, maps, models .photographs and reports., whether in draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of date of termination. Ct�SULTAVT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. T. Natices and UesY Hated Rearesen`at ves- " Any and all notices,, demands, invoices and written commurr.ications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named individuals, ,furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the pa- -ties under this Agreement: Any such notices, demands, i,.uaices and vr:.tten communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty-eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States :nail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance* CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to ammence work on a subcontract until all insurance required 'of the I subcontractor has been obtained.. CONSULTANT sha take cut anc mainta'? at all times during the term of this Agreement the follor�, ng��poliaies of insurance: `a) worker1z _ Commensatic;n insurance: Before beginning work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance ,as proof that it has ,t -.ken out full workers$ compensation insurance for all persnns whom it +,pay, iamploy directly or through subcontractors in carrying o14 'the work specified herein, in accordance ',;Nth the laws of the S; „ate of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Cade Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to - -his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sigr and file with CITY a certification as follows: .1it am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor, ^ode which requires every employer to be insurj* rains liability for worker' compensation or to undertake seifti.nsuran.e; x In accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will compl, with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement". (b) Public Liability and Prgaer'-v Da -mace: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost' and expense; CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full . force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, -comprehensive, broa3 form., general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protection of a least one Million Dollars (1,000,000.00) fur bodily injury or death to any one person sr, for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars (1,000,000.00) for property damage. (e) Errors and omissions: !CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions ("malpractica") providing protection of at beast for errors and omissions ("malpractice" with respect to loss arisitsg from actions off'NStTLTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY. (d) General ,,T,su+-ance ��'; �p� me, nt�- All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be "c& tied only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies requireA under paragraphs a. (a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain languag &, to tha extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer waives the right: of, subrogation against CITY and C.ITY's elected vLfficials, office,;, emplayees, and agents; (2) the policies arm p= --a end nonccatr butinq with any insurance that may he ca- --lied by CI'T'Y, and-(S) they cannot be cancelled, or`materially changed except after thirty (3 0) days :notice by the insurar to CITY by - certified mail. CONSULTANT shall tarnish CITY with copies, of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate -evidencing the. insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 5. indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, in.;emnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability frog loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intent;.onal or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the perfcrmance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to all i consequential damages, to the zaximum extent permitted by law. 10: Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of perfc- manes hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Indeaendent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. ..7_ r lb�: ^rpnina Law; This Agreement shall b governed by and_ obnstrt d-a in accordance with the laws rt t4s State at California, _ ll. AttornovEs Eeefi: In the event any proceed, q is instituted to eaforcq'any term or provisidn of the At, aemeast, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover` attorneys' fees and,vosts trom the opposing party in an axountt determined by the Court to be reasonable.,.,5 i 3144 entire Agr, MelY'C.t This Agreement supersedes any -ax %d all w+� #xr :agreements, either oxal , or in writir..g, be_'t re' h `too ,parties Izith, i smapect to the subject .matter nerein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation bbr any part; which, is rot embodied harein nor any rsthe�4' ac teem nt, , statement-, ,,or promise not contained in this Agrk:(»nenll shah, be valid anti binding. Pny modification of this Agreement shall. he ' effective only if it tss in writing Z_gned by all parties. IN WIT44 -ZSS thA parties hsreto have executed this Agreement as of tha day and yaar first set: forth above: (i ti: :)NSULTAW.7 CITY OF FJWCHO CUCAMONGA i i Latr; Mayor F ATTEST: `f Approvers as to form: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk AWL City Attorney _g_ Excerpt Pitt The Rancho Cucai-� Sa General Plan i i RIDING, HWING,� BICYCL 114 i,Ekfi CLa Opportunities exist withjn Ranclxo Cucamslriga.l,` ` �`or the provision of traits far transportation and recreation usage. Horseback riding, hiking, logging„ running, walking acid bicycling can all be accommodated in scrite way within Rancho Cycamonja. r one of the secondary benefits of ilia many hood control channels lacing through the j City is the availability ty of right -of -way 'fir i trait :purpose. These rights -of -way were '. onto part, of the tan Urraarolno rpunty I ` Recreational, Plan, providing ft \ znutti-pur t pose visage; i.e. bicycles, tkrking, and equestrian. in nflrthern Alta Loma resideyttal develop- meat he,; provided for equestrian i4se. How- c, ever, there were no consi<_tent design Stan - darts employed resulting in.lnad uate trail systerir4, and a fragmented ection of easements within various tract devatcprrients, tie major��'y of which lack standard ,trail widths, uniform design, and developd;ent. Man }_:. ,traits empty into the street or ri.?ad- end at walls, '"a=ces, ravines, or flood= control channels. The Trails pcan deals with two areas; the resolution of existing trait problem areas withirr developed residential areas; and, a consistent policy for a tract system for new development where appropriate. Trail Concept 'The-objective of the trait sysfefi is to deliryate all overall network of intercon- nect,' ng trails which are integrated with recreation areas, parks, open spaces,, resi- dential and commercial and industrial areas. The overall trail concept is based. upon three components; - Reg.ior+al h�ultl- purpose trails Community trails Local Feeder-trails, ?, The Regional Mutti-purpose TraHs are the backbone `of the system. They are re- served, extended tong distance .corridors and serve as the main 610- hectors o thr ' a " regional parks- scenic cap \yoils, tine net forest, other c Jqr open spy „� , resici�'” andr,, .commercial `Tra'Ifsrfaprovides the use=r with �to ;;;;; ' °B=b� access the. Regional Multi- purpose Trails -_.... :::;:: et ii ." ; ttYj=, - � .,; to community facilities +'ch a5 Heritage , i s ,c..a�s.l. r k += �_ _� , .c.xni.- h. ; = s Park._; Alta l,o�na Park'�Base Line Par r in 't " c Elementary, Junior and S High Schpopol�s;` 1pic�r '` Shopping Centers and the .q lane! shopping Center. CoFnInunity Trails d dkten through the community along water ways, utility corridors, public rights -of -way, .easements, and along streets/1 havi 9 adequate parking width. Communtt trails, that extend south- erly- -of, the shad'd kea of the ,Equestrian/ Rural (3re.a, shold not be requnred to pro- vide for equestrian usage , except in areas where continuity of. the system is needed. 1 These trails form loops of varying' length and act as the lnitial 'Ifnk of unifying the existing disjointed Local Feeder, Trails. Local Feeder trails, not identified on the EQUESTRIAN / RURAL AREA :- map,' are contained within subdivisions and DESIGNATION enable the user access from their reside ` I lot to the Community or Regional Multi -' pose Trail, residential ^ neighborhoo- , schools, and parks. Emphasis should be, placed on establishing appropriate Local Feeder Trails at the time of subdivision . approval or development review. K. CBJECTIVE " The objective below and. subsequent policies in conjunction with those expressed in the circulation sub - element, shall be used to develop the Trail System. Provide an interconnected system of riding, bicycling and hiking trails which: Have safe: access and travel to neighbo�- hood, city, regional parks; recreationet facilities, scenic areas, residential, commercial and industrial areas; are aesthetiZzally pleasing and create a "country and rural atmosphere" by integrating natural' areas and urla&n Ah areas with V;'611 Planned tine, spaces, POLfCIES o That .the area as shown in the EqL ` Rurat- Aesignated area provide for: The keeping and protection of an private property, including ;.ovine, cleft- hoofed ; animals, an i try. Require that all development writ i area P61ate to existing and futur l occupied by equine, bovine, cleft animals and poul=try by providir connections through easements ii to connect disconnected trails needed access to recreation act! vi 1� I `• < �., a That all troll easement shall ba tainerl through an active prog weed abatement in a neat and r manner on all developments. o The g'tty should promote progra impraving existing trails such as re existing barriers on trail systems t the trails safer, more functiona accessible to adjacent trails. o The City, shall establish a maste system which provides for: - Regional Multi- Purpose Trails whit nett to regional recreation areas dentiaf, 'commercial and industrial Community 'trails which connect re tial areas, local activity centers, a regional shopping center and the F ai Multi - Purpose Trail system. Local Feeder Trails which connect vid;aal residential lots to the Goth and Regional Trail System. o The City shall facilitate the developa a Regional Multi - Purpose Trail Sysl Ij shown on Figure 111 -7. All segme the regional Multi-Purpose tr=ail s' I shall be available for use as eque: f pedestrian and bike trails where Peas 112 k E ! k? � � . g ■� � ■ . . ZL'�� E Im \ou \\ 7 m \\ t k } \ t : : Wa . ■R/ § " §.0 2 O 2 � 2 o $ k 2� :0. $ §� k w 0 \\ §q.. k? � � . g ■� � ■ . . ZL'�� E Im I) o The City shall establish an agreement with San Bernardino County for the use and maintenance of the Flood Control Rights - of -Way for the Traits. o The City shall - establish+ an agreement With public and private utilif(es for the, use and ma.nter ."pee of utility corridors and' = Kights dfi•WeY for trail purpoees, o All new development shall be developed in accordance with this Master Plan o Trails and adopted City Design Standards. o Trails shall be maintained on natural sur- faces and located along natural, physical features where ever possible. 4 The City shall establish a liason committee including" members from the local riding club, the Planning Commission, the City Council, the City Staff and other memebers at large to review all reidential- :projects in die City for trail usage. a Any-raw development should conllder prior existing bicycling, pedestrian and eques- man access and traditional travel routes through the property. o, riian- residential development should con- sider use of ° amenities, for equestrian, pedestrian and bicycling activities such as hitching posts, benches, rest areas, drinking fountains and bike stands.. • Whenever possible, along Community Trails, street trees and landscaping should be included into the design adjoining she trails, The pallet of trees should conform to street tree standards but be low main- tenance and drought tolerant. • The City shall consider a program for the maintenance, and where necessary, con - struction and rehabilitation, of Community Traits. • Whenever possible and feasible, the City shall .;require that all residential lots in the equestrian rural area have Local Feeder Tralls on the rear of the lot. 114 �- 31 k Yyr .5 ii }' b f �X San Bernardino County for the use and maintenance of the Flood Control Rights - of -Way for the Traits. o The City shall - establish+ an agreement With public and private utilif(es for the, use and ma.nter ."pee of utility corridors and' = Kights dfi•WeY for trail purpoees, o All new development shall be developed in accordance with this Master Plan o Trails and adopted City Design Standards. o Trails shall be maintained on natural sur- faces and located along natural, physical features where ever possible. 4 The City shall establish a liason committee including" members from the local riding club, the Planning Commission, the City Council, the City Staff and other memebers at large to review all reidential- :projects in die City for trail usage. a Any-raw development should conllder prior existing bicycling, pedestrian and eques- man access and traditional travel routes through the property. o, riian- residential development should con- sider use of ° amenities, for equestrian, pedestrian and bicycling activities such as hitching posts, benches, rest areas, drinking fountains and bike stands.. • Whenever possible, along Community Trails, street trees and landscaping should be included into the design adjoining she trails, The pallet of trees should conform to street tree standards but be low main- tenance and drought tolerant. • The City shall consider a program for the maintenance, and where necessary, con - struction and rehabilitation, of Community Traits. • Whenever possible and feasible, the City shall .;require that all residential lots in the equestrian rural area have Local Feeder Tralls on the rear of the lot. 114 �- 31 }.§ � a & 2 R■ \ /k§ v #S, §a UJ ,.§2 + «.2 � � / K$ ■» §#§ m C, � i �t \S § #7e2 �� ■ J HOW dl) :E U. 2 «S §F.§ 2 O\ \/ I O U 26 k 10M /2 �z■w� 2 §55K2 #o■ ■= . � §w keu■2, . »o LLI g 0 0 S, .2 § ® �a Rd� E222° @o s 7 20 $ ujRa, §;.2/ %& !010 U U| 4115' §9§ ��. {� \.| � t§ � ! ga. f -32 11 Bccrispt From The Rancho Cucamonga DevelupRint Code Sectfan 17.24.05a Section Oxerla, District A. Fur e.. The general �J a at this, district is to designate an area of the City to keep equins, bovine aadcleft- hoofed animals. In addition, the following outlines mote cifia pwposes,tuid intents of this District: 1. This desigisatioa is iatendad to protect the ability to malptain such animals;, �;. 2. This Diatriet is intended to promote a "ruralfarm! character in an urban,. �, seeking; 3. This District recogniAos and aneoucages the educational values derived from raising and malntah*4f such animals; and 5 obis District recogribm the recreational value derived from raising end lcraEntainirtg such anmaais H. - District itoundariesq-Ir addition to the area designated in the Edwanda Specific Y-1a 2oc tad g�nerallg north of Hanyen Avenue, beginning at the west City limits ano;gorng east to the future location of Millikett Avenue, sh&'. be included , In the Y��,,4trian Overlay Dist# t and as shown on tho Development District Map. C. 'C: euYs. :1llk new developments within t" District shall, be required to prpvide �r These tzraiit sha]I ba prevailed in order io develop or connect trails 10rr� tiriI or 2ocali fn accordance with the ado ted traits ma of the Genera Plan discoaluous trtuLs foe ne^id access to. recreational amenities. such as the Nationalorest,;equestriazt i:; sli2fes, regional parks and trails and community and local tr .. All trails shall be developed is accordance with thN City adopted "Fquestriaa isail Cuidelires ". in addition, development of any trai7s�alZ include pro visiorM far contiaucus asaititerunc�. �,� , fE D. Animal ReRulations. The number, tars and location. of "Imais are 1 in Chapter 17.0— a at this Code. "Elie keeping of animals in this District shall be consistent with These regulations: Within this District, subdivision'CC&R's shall me prot+,[bit the keeping of such animal3,: where the requirements for the keeping of Sili srdnaIs have been met. -355- t El nTMTT ^" in. • wTi -.rrR .-� �/ +s.+ �/i" &Y1 utvly V4 Vi1LTiViY V1'1 C13 AM S`rALFF REPORT^ f9c cti e Q F DATE: February 25, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TERRA .',il�T! A MEDIANS 'fir I. ABSTRACT: The Gommiss�pn is to review and consider all material and input and to establish" policy in regards to appropriate location for median breaks on primary circulation routes within the Terra Vista Planned Cornuni ty. II. BACKGROUND: The Design Review Committee (Barker, 1.'oleman), in their review of Tentative Tract 13270 at their meeting of January 22, 1987, expressed concern over the issue of median breaks within Terra Vista. This project is located on the south side of Church Street between Elm and Milliken. The proposal for this proj%t was to locate a median break within Church Street mid -block between Elm and Milliken to permit left turn access into the project site from east bound traffic on Church. The concern of the Design Review Committee was that median breaks would eliminate a significant amount of landscaping, thereby detracting from the overall aesthetic quality of the streetscape. The Committee directed that this issue be brought before the review and consideration of the Planning Commission -For discussion and policy direction. III. ANALYSIS: 1977 Median breaks along Church Street between Haven and Rochester Avenues are inferred in the Terra Vista Community Plan on Page IV- 49 (attached) where access to the commercial and office Dortion of Terra Vista is addressed. Access to this property from Foothill Boulevard will be restricted to 'h mile spacings by the median in Foothill. Church Street was designed to be the primary access (along with the intersecting streets) for these commercial "blocks", thus providing tie amount of access required for the planned levels of land use. ITEM S s ruANNING COMMISSION °STAFF REPORT TERRA VISTA MEDIANS ` February 25, 1987 Page 2 Fr From the standpoint of traffic service along Church Street, a aid - block median break in blocks longer than 8W feet will not have a harmful effect on traffic flow. All but one of the blocks on ,Church Street have lengths of 800 feet or more, with the shcwter -block occuring near Rochester Avenue in a residential area. 'From the standpoint of traffic service along Foothill Boulevard, full use of Church Street for access to this part of ,?�srra Vi is is essential to eliminate heavy left and qU1 turns it the signaled intersections on Foothill. Recognizing that the median in Church Street is solely for aesthetic benefit, the grometric requirements for the left turn pockets can be held to a minimum so as to leave an ample length of median island available for landscaping. This is shown in the concept plan on display tonight. IV. RECOMMENDATION., Staff recommends that the Commission permit a mid -block median break within Church Street between Elm and Milliken. Staff feels this median break is necessary to pro*, de full access potential to adjacent properties. In consideratito of the concerns of the Design Review Committee, the median break at this location has been designed to minimum acceptable stan'�O'w -to -permit maxim landscape potential to mitigate any aesthetic concerns. Staff further requests that the Commission consider all material and input and to establish a policy as to esta!!gishing parameters for acceptable median break locations within tiie Terra Vista Planned Community. No formal Resolutiw is necessary, final determination can be made by minute action. Re fuily's tte Braa But er City Planner BB:BC:te Attachments v ,. S`A t s C."r c a. eN La f _♦♦ t_ ti m � a �a r it to Z5 E E pE E T >� 0 t1 •wtY wall C7 r LL C. � ts u.....+ .+. N a.t a+ i N t•• t 3 N N +-�. C N c t Orotu L tUGrE^ >C�'7LCOCO us" c�aNOt ro� °/' :� s0 m -;c:. O tT O y d: Q U d m t. tU m N U a UO .x 8 —Y .0 V- CMS. U S�•OUC C ,E L N C1 "n B t_ U Ct C) y C N ro N m L— ro p. vLL �° w >'Ew �'^ m � mLU c C roOOC �LL�L L >wc%+0++pi >ro >iL,LN5roj :�'UN `LLaI N ymN. ,.CC.O V BN3OC�ta o3CU u. t3C3roy ymcyN °E° EN C'L41 L Qdt1OOff".U.41 4tjM 3 m 112: u �" v C ,. R a E .+ «°� Q. C a m= •'- ' E �a c Ln C� v Nay a u'" L o° a>i o 0 t_L O Ui+ pro > ro - 1 C N?` ct Cm a CLL u1 a� y*' v �.. � L: r= C_ ,M u �II� urn L+s+E =mom ?Jro .0 u UOL47 O u L -zroQyO✓3 InQSO Y�r ,r_Cc 'C °2S. t? O.tudANr%° ffl+L+t'a'UO`� C; ±t ro p ro 7 p x..:C u.. +n w w O CL E L N n U 0 L tL L a L c ro O N a C E m = LL .+ L Q ro -0. M, O C W '�"' m L a In- L- E +tv U t_:K;' to �tTO�asw�L Lpt�, > 7 �'-' U > .O t3..,p.I ;_ = IU C E =.a - q7 V 7 Z U O N C O1 O p, C° OM �� L 2-4 �-'� Uf U O U NC UE0) ra 00ti?.V Oro L IT v .yO+E'4aU+dNC to ¢ ° �NV�E ai aNi�ic Ut Eyy�o =C« a °aci.= +:-o'a Aft �N�EO v. v��yaV vtm.+cco3roos m 4OCnOfl s a e F - °uun. ¢ ¢mm3Ew s o or S -3 TiTl TTI yl Tl'I IT • I N ! r i t a 1 S-4