Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987/03/25 - Agenda Packet0702 -02 3-25-87 PG Agenda � � C6 LA r MY OF RANIaiQ O�CANIONGA TLAN INING COM JSSIC)N 0 AGENDA > WEDNESDAY March 25,1987 7WO p.m. UUNS PARK COMMUNM CANTER 9191 BASE LIKE RANCHO CUCAMOHqA, CAMORMA �,,�L Pledge of Allegianee IL Ron call Commissioner Barker Commissioner MeNiel Commissi,--,:,,v Chitlea Commiss! , dri.r Tolstoy—,— COmmlb-S!6;14,� EraerieF EIL Announ!*-neniz IV. PIVIsenthtlor. of Cqmmendation Rewlution to IL D&Vid B"ker V- Election of CtWrman and Vlee-Chairman VL APProval of Minutes June 25,1986 January 28, 1987 February 11, 1987 VM Consent Cdandar The following Consent Ual8n&jr items are expected to be routine and:nOn-conir ,9versial. ThQY Will be acted on by the Commission at 000 tinle widbut discus3fGm if anyone has conjoern over any item, it -should be removed for dtscupt3iom 771 1 0 4 L- J t b r & ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSiy1ENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMU PLAN ii COMMUNITY AMENDM9N1? 2 - WESTERN PR01'F"t TiEd -,The quest to amend Terra Vita Plamied �» Comrmmitiy bb establ�Wn�} a Businesgr Park Overlay Zone for areas designated, as Commereial and Mixed Use within. the Wanmd Co i�ijy boundary. '1 ( E. ENYLRO,NMHNTAL ASSESSMENT AND TRACT.i 13057 ltilODll?1 TID THE& DS {f E CG WHINY - modiUnation to conditions of, approval to +permit wre t iron feneir adjacosit to Deer Creek Lor Traef 13057, an! spprov4d; 9sidential i,§ubdivision of 22.55 acres within the Vietoria_`'" Planned Cdtnmunity (Low- Medium Residential, 4 -8 dwelling units per acre) into 1 &7 lots, located at the southeast c -ler of HighLAnd Avenue and Deer Creek APN 202 - 211 -1tig. (Continued from February 25,1987) i 1 C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT (.,% REYiEW it6 2'1 MOFINTAiN;; VIEW BUILDERS - the developrnett ` o ;r' a 13,70 square foot manufAtturta f twarehouse building addition to an existing 86,000 s+luare foot building in the General Industrial /Rail Served D�strict (Subarea 5) located at the southeast corner of 7th Street and Coster - APN 209 - 242 -08. D. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 12902 - NORDIC - Design J review of building elevations end plot plans for 29single 1 family lots on 22.73 acres of land in the Very Low Density residential District (less than 2 dwelling unite per acre), located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Almond Street - APN 201- 071 -05, 06, 25, 26, 35 6C.36. - VIII~ Public Hearings The following items are public hearbVs in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of 'the n project. fated Please ,T wait to be recognized by the Chairman and d1dress the Commission by stating your name aid address.. All mch opinions shall be limited to 5 minute-i Per indi dduci for each project. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN IME-RD NT 87 -02A - CITY OF RANCHO OUCAMONGA: - A request to amend the Circulation Element of the General Plait. M` 7 K q, F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASUSSMENT AND G `*�L� �'Le�I3 MEN13M NT 86-01D) - Cl Y OF RANG O, A A request to amend t_hs Land Use ]Eteman 'of a Ge Plan fretn Lowy- Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwe7 in - unit$ /acre) to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units /ecre) and/or Very Low Density Residential (less titan 2 dwelling units /acre) for 68 acres` of land locateO a: fha. . ` Southwest corner of Wilson (if exf6ded) and Milliken (if extended) - AM 201-191-1,1, 17,. (Continued from. Pobruary 25, 1961) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRUCT ARE -NUM NT 86-65 - CITY t1B RANCHO CUCAYIQitGA A request to am @nd the Development idL�trid Msg -from "MFG "" (,uiaad Control; and "1,1VIn (Lora- ._ Medium Density Residential -• 44 dwelling units/acrd) to --IV' (Low Density Residential - 2-4 dwelling units /acre) and /or F "VL!" (Very Lowe Density Residential - less 'than 2 dwelling units /acre) for 68 acres of land located at the CSuthwest " corner of Wilson (it extended) and Milliken (if extended) - Ae.�� 2 -.01- 191 -11, IZ. G. E&,%, AONMHN'TAL ASSESSMENT AND T'ENTA'TIVE TRACT A 13542 - DEE& CREEK v A custgM�10t SUbdivision of 206 '+ single family parcels on 66.65 acres of land in the Low Medium Density Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per ,acre), located east of Chaffey College between Wilson ( Avenue and Banyan Street - APN 201 - 151.17 and a portion of 201- 151 -11. { I H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATiVF TR&C'T- 11 1l IiIEDMAN-HOMES - A total residential cavelopment r of 123 single family lots on 84.5 acres of land in the Very Low f Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast darner of Archibald Avenue and Carrari Avenue -APR 201 -07144, 37, aW 45. L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIARCE 86 -118 AMENDED - ; SPETN GEL A request to waive the maximum heig4t requirement of 50 feet for an extendable radio antenna to allow an existing antenna to be extended to r 72 feet on a .47 acre parcel in the Very Low Residential° District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) located,-at 5327 Carol Avenue - APH 1961ALA 19. -t l J. TIME EXTENSION FOR C014DMONAL USE PElii IITI 84 -2 AL A L9nfA Q., RIS`ILAN CiiUOtGFI - A request to conv'�rt an ') coasting 1, $ sq care foot si�agjs roily residence tp,an office . for the Alta Loma Christian Church on .25 acres of land in tha; Low Residential District (less than 25dwdli% units per ael �) located on the we!i -.side of Sapphire, "across from 987 a - APN 1062- 332 -23. (Continued " from January 28, li. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN'D 'TEN`M`_4TIVE TRACT 13'2'79~ �.39ILLdAN YL O COMP�A� - A real�c�� tial tract 9jbdivision of 08.23 acres Into 1 lots to ot�eate &finning areas for the future development of the Vineyards North Village within. the Victoria. Planned Community, g°,nerally located north of Southern Pacific Railroad, south of Highland, "mot of Day Creek & east of Milliken- AJ'N 227y- 011 -01, 02, .. °> ¢ 03, 04, 05, 06, & 07, 227- 081 -�01, 04, 08, 09, 10;' 11, & 227-v 091 -36. L. ENVIRCNMENTA6 ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 8742 Dk;rKK DEVE�LOT MF. l - A request to reduce the riumher of marking spate d, the side yard setback area, and the ` front yard setbac�(ard to exceed the height limitation for a 1, j . proposed 11,000 ware foot office building at 9113 Foofh"li i� Boulevard in an ffice Professional District looted on soutn side of Foothill Boulevard west of Hellman Avenue and east of Vineyard Avenue. Tree Removal Permit 87 -21 requesting the removal o? 3 mature Chestnut trees, 4 'Licuidambars dc 4 Modesto Ash trees - APN 208- 341 -09. (Related File: DR 86 -46). M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND xENTATiYE PARCEL M `11393 - KEVM MKIPANY - A subdivision of-7942-acres X lar v ,� utto 33 pc ,cis in tt,e Industrial .ark District (Subarea 16), located at the hart :wwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street - APN 210- 062 -13, 11, 02, 26, 33, 32. (Related Files DR 136.37); UL New Businm N. ENVIRr»MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RUM. OR 8T-46 - DECKF DEVELOPMENT - ., proposai to construct an 11,000 sq.-ft. of ice building at 9113 Foothill Boulevard in the Office Professional District located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, vest of Hellman and east of Vineyard Y- APN 308- 241 -09. Associated with this >proposal is Tree Removal Peermit 87 -21 requesting the removal of two (2) Chestnut trees, 4 Liquidambar trees, and 4 Modesto t t re es r, O. E0MONKENTAL ASSE%, DAENT AND DEVELOPMENT" ' JEW 6-3 - iiEITH COW-A" - The development of a Raster Plan or a 70.17 acre industr iial park eonsistng of 33 lets in the Industrial Park District - (&,barea 16), located at the northwest quadrant of 4th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 210-062 -02. 11, 13} 26, 32 and 33. , (Aelated Files PM 10393) P. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 36-40 d CHG ARCHITECT INC. - 'w` The cteve2apm@ + o a �4,ti'00uate fdgt bank 5 curity - Pacific rational "Bank) of 0.68 acres of land withia an _ t ' appr.lovee!"25.3 acre shopp rg center Ii Cite Neighborhood Commercial District of the Terra. Vista Plannsd'Coromunity, loo thed a:t the northeast'eorner of Base Limi goad at%d Haven Avenue - APY 202 - 901 -25, 26. @. r NVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ` v A EVIEW 86-42 - LEFF - The development '0 11 Industrij multi- tenant buildings totaling 150,754 square feet on 9.15 acres of land in the Industrial Bark District (Subarea 7) located on thii north side of .arrow highway between White Oak and kaple' 8f'Sr,}ts - APN 208 - 351 -69, 61, 67 -70. R. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND i)EVELOPIVIENT REVIEW $6-45 - AdA �- The review a a lot Master Plan 0 15.59 acres and development of lots 2 and 3 of the Master ¢ Plan. Lot 2 consisting of a 41,500 square foot - %ndiistrial building on 2.36 acres and :Lot 3 consisting of a 52,2511 square foot industrial building an 2.77,accres.of .land all within the industrial Park District (Subarea 12), located on the east side of Pittsburgh Avenue south of -Stir Street - APN 228- 263.. -3, 4. S. PRELIMINARY REVIEW 86-76 - GREENViEW ESTATES ` A consistency determination; between the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies and a proposed development of 142 townhom2 units on 11.86 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 du /ac) located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue - APN 207- 201 -30 & 41, -43. M Director's Reports T. INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS - SUBAREA 8 U. PRESENTATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VIDEO - Oral Report XL Commission Business I i (i VI I I �[�a I! Y. MA r .................... ` t.,.. r.._ ...�, .. ............ ��� .e ^ - SPHERE OF INFLUENCE ! 1p NIL LSID akc A * a _.! O t SUMAIT Twit. PA , AWA qp CT SWAY �a ^s se = -pia r -1 w • • r w m 3AS9 LINT 0 'lic x:H ' v* U � CHURCH raa�wray•w�a -.. P,.,rLL�'R °� \( a s GO HILL. • �%' � CITY OF RANCHO OLIOAMMMA 1 W iLj-- a IL ,. Ak CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, STAFF RE PORT DATE:, March 253, 1987 1977 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROW Brad Buller, City Planner SY: Nancy Fong Associate Planner SUBJECT: E IE11nk1 ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY e tsb-uz - NWERN FRUNLK 'IES - 'Tile request Ito aye nd a erra Vista PT, nne ommunity by establ ist,ing � a Business Park Averlay'Zone for areas designated as Office Park, Commercial and nixed use within the Planned Community boundary. I. BACKGROUND: 'The Planning Commission, at its regular meeting of a e ruary -'987, conducted a public hearing to consider the proposed amenemnt to the Terra Vista Planned Community as described above. The Planning Commission could not make the necessary findings to support the proposed aarendment, :r►d directed staff to prepare a Resrlution recommending denial to the City Council. Attached for your review is .a copy of the Resolution of Denial. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planeing Commissi©n Ropt the a ac ed.!Wsolution recoawnding denial to City Council. Respectfully submitte Brad B ler City Planner BB:NF:vc Attachments: Resolution Recommnding. Denial ITEM A a RESOLUTION NO y A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COM'TSSION REC€l UDING DENIAL OF TERRA VISTA PLANNED tOMMUNITY �k" NDMENT 86.02, TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLANNED TEXT BY ESTABF.ISKIR I A &USINESS PARK OVERLAY ZONE FOR AREAS DESIGNATED AS OFFICE PARK DISTRICT, COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ANN MIXED USE DISTRICT WITHIN THE PLANNED COMMUNITY BOUNDARY. A. KECITALS (i) WHEREAS: Western Peoperties Eras filed an application for. th.Q -> approval of a Terra Vista punned Community .14mckent 85 -02, described above in the title of this Resolution. (ti) WHEREAS,, on October 8, 1986, the Planning £oWssion of the City monga conducted a duly naticed public: hearing on the pNogosed amendment, and:, at tae request of the applicant:,. said he of Rancho Cuca oar was f continued. ' The applicant on November 5, 1986 sutwitted the first revision to the proposed amendmient Far Pl"ninr, Commission review. At the continued November 11, 1986 meeting, ;the Plk Commission continued the hearing at the request of staff, to alldi,, tffitcient time to review the proposed!` revision to the ament�ent. iho'reafter, on December 10, ;1486 and February U, 1987, the Planning Commission again held public hearings an the proposed araendraent whAre or' ash such date, it was continued at the remost of the applicant. On February 10, 1997, the applicant submitted the second revision tai the proposed amendment for Planning Commission review. (iii) WHEREAS. at the continued meeting of February 25, 1987, the j Planning CommissioH hs+?a� public hearing to conl1der the subject matter of the proposed axifdAnt and directed staff to prepare a resolution recommending denial for their review at the March 25" 1987 regular Plannin3 Coreaission meting under, a Consent Calendar item. tiv) WHERUS, all 'legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Reso'Tution of have occurred. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it 'Is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of :Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comdssion hereby specifically Finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. PLANNING COMMISSI -ON STAFF REPORT ".' TRACT 12902 -DR - NORDIC n -, March Zs, 1981 J Page 3 Aft j Ji 5. Lot should be redesignei, N minimize the land "Hermosa alteration of form adjacent to Avenul,q. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission �,. approve t�ie�iuTlding elevations and plot plans through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. RespectfUl7y subg�itte , ;I ` /Brud Bul er City--Pl nner ' BB:SM:sgr j Attachments: Exhibit "A'° - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "B" Detailed Site and Grading - Plaa Exhibit "C" - Building Elevations i Resolution of Approval with Conditions d 'I CrIvy Of. RANCHO CUCAiMQNGA PLANNING DRrE[CN D-q TrrLE, exHiluT.—d—g-ALD 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCATM0 -a rGA TrrrE:.��,z _� 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCATM0 -a rGA TrrrE:.��,z _� F, CITY OF PLANNIN tXVE C1l'�I E?kFiiE�iT: _SG1�LE= 7 Y PLANNING COMMISSION'RESOLUTIOU NO'. � TVPC 86 -02 - WESTEW PROPAT.IFS r *. March €5, 1987 a Page 2 ' 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented Commission during the above referenced October 8; 1986, Novemaen_12, 1986, 'December a 10, 1586, February I1 1987 and February 25, 1987 pablic hearings,. — including written staff reports, this Commi ssion hereby specifically finds,as follows: a. The proposed amendmi� , by -tddii1g custom manufacturing industrial type of land uses, substantially alters the g pssent planned land use of the Terra Vista Planned Q- nwnity and the Genera's Plan. J, b. The proposed a*ndment would conflict with the objectives and policies of the General Plan, industrial Specific �K; Plan and the Terra Vista Coommi-ty Plan. c. The proposeo;,ame€ldsment, in adding custom manufacturing i industrial uses-,: within the residentially planned community, could' have.,a significrnt. impact on the environownt by exposing people.to an Increase ti traffic hazard since truck traffic wopid increase substantially;,, and, expose people to an increase fin heal' h, safety and nuisance factor such as noise,,,nd odor, 3. Based'-upon the substantial akz!dence p6 sented to-'this Wmamission during the above referenced public hearingu and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows f a. The ameneApent is in conflict ztith th3 Tan'd use policy of the General Plan. b. The does not pr. saute the goal s o)f the 1 and use Ills element. c. The amendment would he materially injurious or Detrimental to adjacent properties. 4. Pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of V,.e California .Gorernvint Code, the Planning Commission of. the C,'�\ty of Rancho Cue-a onga hereby recommends denial of Terra Vista Pia+_ned Community Awndment 86 -02. 5. The deputy secretary to this Commission shall certify to the a4_ption of the Resolution. TVPC 8��02 P€ ENt itTl S March 25, 1987 % m Page 3 rvt APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TR DAY OF MARCH, 1987, PLANNING COMMISSION OF TIE CITY OF ►2ANCHo CUCAMONGA ' BY: ' E7 DTV,48aKer, CHWIPS557 R ATTEST: ra u Deputy cr r t .• . I, Brad Deputy Secretar y of the Cc:jaiss�on of the Cit,Y of Par,6ho Cucamonga, -da hereby Certify that the foregaing'�es _': i =at was -d0j and x regu:;ariy intrQd ced,,-,4.ossed., and Adopted by the Planning Cmdssion o�.� the City hf Rancho Cuc"Ong ., t4 regaiat- seeting of the Planning CEmmission hoed on the 25th day of MarCis� by thie following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FOES: ,COMMISSIONERS:, ABSENT- COMMI'S'SIONERS: � 1 i t i i { r_ r f f CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA C�ycan-rQA STAFF R EPOJ-,?T m r Q O a F _Z DATE: March 25, 1587 tsn T0: Ct`,airmmn a(y) Memte"rs or the Planning Convi ss-ion FROM Brad duller, City Planner Bruce Cook, Associate Planner. SU JECT: NVIRONMENTAL ASSE NT AND TRACT 13Q57 (MAIFIOTION) tfcation 7,1 ( U ons o, approve pe, i"w3 ought "iron fencing iukjcent :to Deer Creek Ci:annel for Traci: 13057, an a9provzd residential subd<ivisioh of 22.55 acres within the Victoria Planned Gwns�nntty (Low- Yedium Res do4tial, 4 -8 dwelling, units pQr' acre) into 147 lots, Ucated at the sauthe�s5 corner of Highland Avenue and Deer Creek - APN:- . 21e -13, 29. I. BACKGROUND: The Fieldstone Company is requesting a modificati0 to on t ans of Approval for Tract 13,057 to permit an open -style wrought iron fencing adjacent to the Deer Creek „Channel. This item ' was heard as a Public Hearing by the Planning Commission at their meeting of 'February 25, 1987, At that time the Commission stated their intent to deny the request, but withheld taking action due to the applicant rat being present at the meeting. The Commissi -q. requested that staff notify the applicant of the Comnissiu'h's intent, continued this item to the meeting or March 25, 1987, and directed that a Resolution of Denial be prepared as a consent iterc for action by the Commission. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny - this eque_sT -for modification per the attached Resolution. Respe tfully submitted, $r u er City P1 nner BB: BC: vC Attachments: Resolution of Venial i ITEM 8 ;. RESFILtITION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING'COMMISSIOlt OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAM tt,A-, CALIFORNIA, DENYIN10. MODIFICATION TO TRACT MAP NC: 13057 WHEREAS, a modification to the Conditions of Approval to permit wrought iron fencing adjacent to -Deer Creek Chanrei for Tract 13057 regularly came before the Planning- Cowission for public hearing and action on February 25, 1987; and z WHOM, _the. City Planner has r°ecomended denial of this niodafication for the reasoos as set fora+ iq- the --Planning Division's report, and WHEREAS, tiv Planning Commission bas read and considered the Planning Division's report and has considered other evidence. presented at the public hearing, NOW, THERE €ORE,. -ilie Planning COMMissf "M of the City of Rancho Cucavinga doo resolve '; follows: SECTION r,_� T P'tan� ng Commission makes thr following findings in regard Tract No. 13957., The wall proposed for the other two tracts adjacent to the Deer Creek Channel, I.e. Tracts 13058 and 13059!, would remain as a block wall. To provida the open -style wrought iron fencing adjacent t6 Tract 13057 would then result in an i�tonsistent fencing program along this portion of Victoria's perimeter. A goal of the victoria Planned Commnity is to maintain a consistency of design. ' (b) The stated reasck,fcr this request is to enhance Vier orientations 0, the mountains. Any benefits derived from the wrougitt iron fencing in relation to nc ,in enhanced view, orientation of the mountains wo"�rd be snore than outweighed by the negative Imt Act retultirjq from direct views into the Deer Greek Channel. The purpose of .requiring the block all along the westerly tract perimeter was to screen the flood control channel. Direct, ripen views into the flood control channel, either from public streets o -, from private property, would be an undesirable situation. SECTION 2 Modification to Tract Map No. 13057 is hereby denied. i i ,I J PLANKING'COMMO OR kc.4LUTION NO. ' sr 111V \V I309a7 4 THE ELOSLONE COMPANY fAarct 25,1987 !Page 2. p APPROVED AND ADOPTED THii'25TH gAY,�F,,MARCH, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF `L NCHO C.UCAMONGA BY:, Barger, Gnairman ATTEST: Brad u 1 er . Uiputy secretalry, I, Brad 'Buller, Deput y Secretary of the Planning Ctmimissiorr of; the City of ' Rancho. Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the � City of Rancho CucaatPnga, at a regular meting of the P16Mng, Commission held on the 25th day of Circh, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: E' It AYES: COMMISSIONERSt , NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUC.4MONGA STAFF REPORT re' DATE: March 25,<< 1987 r, a1977 TOt Chairman and\l -ors of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Cif/ Planner BY Chris Westmain, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR WYELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -27 MOUN'FAW --VIEW- Ct3€ 5` 75—i.-ve.op n square tool; manu ac ur ng / warehouse building addition to an exist1n,1 85,000 square foot building in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) l6cated at the southeast -corner of 7th Street and Center Avenue - APN 209 - 242 -08. I. PROJECT AND SITEDESCRIPTION, A. Action Requested; Issuance of a Negative Beclaraticn. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, ISP (Subarea 5) South - Industrial., ISP (Subarea` 5) East o Industrial, ISP (Subarea 5) West - Industrial, ISP (Subarea 5) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - .General Industrial North - General Industrial' South - General Industrial East - General ndu r Ge 1 st ial West General Industrial �> Site Characteristics: The site is curr4;ntly developed with square ee�, of combined manufacturing /warehouse space and an additional 7,160 square -feet of o'f3: q space. The existing building is rail served. The properties which are west, south, and east are developed with industrial Uses. The property to the north is vacant. ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' DR 86 -27 - MOUNTAIN VIEW BUILDERS March 25, 1987 Page 2 E. Parking k lculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Paotage Ratio Requieed Provided ° Office 7,160 1/250 21 al Manufacturing., 67,480 1/500 135 135- Warehouse 25,200 1 /1000 20 20 I /2000 2 2 Proposed , Warehouse Addition 13,715 1/2000 7 7 Additional Sp;!-.es 42 Total 185 227 1I. "VALYSIS:' A. Backg round: The proposed new addition to the existing facility Ts—TR—en-red to increase the off loading and,, warehouse facilities for the project site. .- B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Chitiea, McNieT -., Buller; reviewed t edesl` n of the addition on March 5, 1981 . and recommended approval c1th the fallowing conditions: 1. The outdoor retherm unit should require a�-4,itionai screening from Center Avenue through the use of berms, a screen /security wall of pilasters and wrought -iron, and an intense planting palette consistent with what is existing on the site (i.e. Cypress and Olive trees). Detailed plans for the screen /security wall and landscape theme shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the is;,uafize of building permits. 2. Ef,jnE rarklag spaces at the Southwest corner of the site should be eliminated in order to avoid possible traffic conflicts. 3. The Committee &termined that allowing the use of corrugated metal' siding is appropriate in this particular case.due to the relatively >minor. nature of the proposed addition and the presence of an existing metal addition. KA'BN ,= C YS QIEi,� !# F REPORT DR se-97, - )?90�iliNIN VTJ BOILDERS � March 2s, M7 page 3 C. Engineering Division: The project was over ea a iliti raquPrts and was trined that the overhead utilitlas should be undergrounded with I development of the proposed addition as a conditioir of approval`. The Engineering Division also deti6xfned that present draio'age facilities were not adequate and other measures should be taken In order to improKt upon them. These measures are also listed as conditions of approval. D. Environment l Assessweot: Parts I and R of the Initial Study ave On COW, e ` and no significant impacts have beta found as a result of this project.. If the Commission issues a Negative Declaration, then the City Planner will,approve the project with conditions E b i I11. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 'that the proposed project is- consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and, togett z with the conditions of approval are in conformance with the Development Code, Industrial Sptcifick Platt and all 9thgr applicable City standards. IV. RO NDATION: Starrf recommends "'that the Planing Commission issue a ega't Declaratip-n for DR 86-27 by minute action. Respectfully su Brad Bul fir II City Planner t 83.CW:te Attachnwnts: Exhibit "A" Location Mp Exhibit "8" Site Flan Exhibit "CK - Elevations Exhibit "D" Landscape Flans a�s�,asaar,iewnitts�xi� . ' � y ✓ z 0 {f I I I sl `•�' � \.ter• � 3 f t .4.tlill. :rY - ,t y s ILJ . I ' , \. - _ +rte� ••l� �' �` V v� ,w, *r � � i4•1�N•♦♦♦MN • [ s3 U d W 4 IM ��{'i�,i'�'i �fj�lN X1111 � a+r�es+�wo , i ! e t 2 1 T = s s Z i 3 2 j 2 +fit 3 saseaaotae t If!! w -.. � t _ . P' + °'e '++ •..,,.....♦ .�.,a. •� a "^�"""t� M; � ��.��� i w! •`^� � " ..b�...i.,.'tM a�`..a ...3. _ °' � ' j°"`..� a t- e ' l k t • C_..'7 K I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST"F REPORT' y � r 3 � h Z DATE: March 25, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant.",Tlanner SUBJECT: TRACT 12902 DESIGN REVIEW - NORDIC - Design Review of ova and plot plans or 29 single family lots on 22»-73 acres. of land in' the Very Low Density Residential DfStrict (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located an the west side of Hermosa Avenue South of ATmond,-,Street - APH 201-071-05, 06, 25, 26, 36, 6d $6. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of building elevations and plot �lans. B. Project Density- 1.28 dwelling units per acr-z. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: 'North - vacant, Very Low D-en-sTty Residential (less than 2 l ujac) South - Single family Resident,,41, Very L%, Density Residential (less than 2 du/ac) East ,,Single family Residential, Very Low Density -jesidential (less than 2 du/ac) West - Vacant, Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du/ac. D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very-15—wDensity Residential (less than 2 du/ac) North - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du/ac) South - Very Low Denc.-Ity Residential (less than 2 du/ac) East - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du /a) West - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du /ac) ITEM D A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT E - TRACT 12902-OR NORDIC March 25, 1987 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: -`'The site is located at 0e end of Hermosa Avenue at t base of the foothills. The site slopes- from north to south at an overall grade 'of about 1:01:, exs~ for a bluff along the crest bougdary that exceeds 30% grade. From northeast to southwest,. Va natural drainage ^ourse traveC,�es the site terminating at the flood control facilities at the southwest corner of the property, Mpst of the site -s densely planted with a red gum eucalyptus trees that are about 65 years old... ` II. ANALYSIS• A. Background: This project was origiaally approved on Apr1 -1 23, 19E, as a custom lot subdivision of 28 single. f3 ;y. lots. In Parcel Map 10351 'the addition, was approved-, by Planning £t Commission on January 14, 1987, allowing Lot 4 of Tract 12902 to be split into two lots. B. General: The applicant is proposing to deve14 all 29 lots at this time. The applicant has submitted.fouc loor plans with 3 elevations per floor plan. Flan 2200 is a.single story unit, 2,200 square feet in area.. Plan 2500 is a single story unit, 2,550 square feet in area. Plan 2650 is two story unit, 2,620 square feet in area. Plan 2704 is a two story, 2,800 square foot unit that steps down seven feet from front to rear. C. Design Revt.w Committee: On March 5, 1987, the Design Review Committee " mer c , P. Tolstoy, D. Coleman), reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the following Ij conditions: -' 1. Grading should be reduced on all lots through the use of natural rear yard areas or decks areas as opposed to manufactured flat areas. The revised grading plan presented by the applicant was acceptable, except as otherwise noted below. 2. Small retaining wails should be incorporated into the rear yard of Lots 16 and 23 to further reduce I grading. 3. The driveway on Lot 1 should be relocated to the west side of the parcel. j 4. The residences on lots 2, 3, 22, 23, 25, 2 and 27 should be shifted to maximize the preservation of trees between units tat least a double row)., A a r a \ j '* � 3 oa11 •;w ;R I i • I CITY OF rMN RANCHO CUCAif ONGA PLANNING DI f K I SCALD _ t a LV r `lk r a \ j '* � 3 oa11 •;w ;R I i • I CITY OF rMN RANCHO CUCAif ONGA PLANNING DI f K I SCALD _ t v 2 o N 'I 5 �[e cm U., -A ail Paz L lk 44 - e tq(°J I C � •3:� �s4999S n1 t {t♦� i l a� .°�,� L 7� CITY O RANCHO CUCAMaNGA TrrLEv PLANNING I)iViS xN °q ��� rc�rr:. -. . y.'Sr NLE Itl F Iq Y 0 I I. I I I i CITY Or. rrE&1: PLANNING DM SIGN b��® t Q H K O I8 Itl F Iq Y 0 I I. I I I i CITY Or. rrE&1: PLANNING DM SIGN b��® t Q H K O CITY OF n-c %r. � iZ-A-P2 RANCHO CUCA.t�ItINGA 'i M..E= 105' Fm LEFT SIDE ELEVATION " IHOW SC" S ELEVATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DrV —�. 2500 A lov Trr E. �I�Y Tl%DiS Exxcr3rr:-� SG%.LE -_ REAR ELEVATION! CITY OF rrc%c: ,Z� %29 2Z) PLMNING Dnnsx D-13 s k 2500 a no _ f — W- LEFT ELEVATION �,.�,,..• RP ME MONT ELEVATION TTY O rrcLt: �i?962 RANCHO CUCAMONGA �;� ©,ss PLAP�tNI,Nc Drvow EXH113m. >>7 GPiSiil�i iq/1Y MilY� /�L py. REAR ELl VATkON CITY OF ITEM t= ' /2gd2 zee RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: pi;..`1.Ni`�(Iti C: C}CVLsm a i3 _ I Ell WSW IL . EVATICM 12 CITY Or. 9��2 aANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrL-E HIT PLANNING MISON Z-160 F- XM N ■ DO LID El i7gL7n i- sann o 3q M7GE] i a � LM I Cr"y Or.. ne PLAMING DWESI F-XHIMT: 'lv L ul to C%l z 0 i. It O O CITY Or. ITEM: RATNITCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE: PLANNING DIVLqnN Sr ,\LE- H; z 0 i. It O O CITY Or. ITEM: RATNITCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE: PLANNING DIVLqnN Sr ,\LE- lu lu c t. r .1r. 717 1 I CITY Or. rrE.% RANCHO C00WONGA, TM-E- PLAMING DrVISIQN F-XHW- SCALE, 2700 -A FRONT ELEVATION " RHM $WE RLEVATIom m. CITY Qr. ITGN[ =Zi RANCH CUCA Vm.CX GA f m_E, PI.AMUNG DRgSK]N • Ir W] CITY Oil", rrE.% i RANCHO CUCAiQN(-,'- TrIu. s PLAMING DWISM D-, FAONt EMAT" NOW A EUVATM a.. .,.. CITY OF, rrEm- /4g4g RANCHO CJt,. A—IMa lNGA TITLE. &Z.eV0, -►� 142A4S- � Kj CITY O AIN(, CUCAMO1lGA TITI-E: �L,-f�f7 ,- /ice' � . J 1 T /sf R �p CE y Ate, Kj CITY O AIN(, CUCAMO1lGA TITI-E: �L,-f�f7 ,- /ice' � . J CITY i �:;f�I .� yp g� �� �L`1. -2 • Iz9nla RANCHO CL'�V 0N( : ;t� � � TITLE = �_ e Nrif G DrVIS'EC N b-(p EYHI,�iT- G+►LE I n _ 1 III ��a 1 Ala lu- W (j W JOE T z a m J W 1 W D PS � t J } 3. r - I qq 1 CITY OFD rrE m: _ Ag-,:?02 R.IAINCHO CUC r1ItiUNGA TMLE- PLANNING IMrf 'ISK)N F- XHIMT;- C.,s!'s�tLE 1, RESOLUTION NO. qW ' CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION A RESOLUTION OF THE RANG, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 12902 LOCATED. ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE SOUTH OF ALMOND STREET IN 4 THE VERY 04 DENSITY RESTRIENTIAL DISTRICT �4HEREAS, on the 23rd day of February, 1987, a complete application I was filed by Nordic Develcpment for review of the above- described project, and � WHEREAS, on the 25th day of March, 1987, the Rancho Cucam6hii Planning Comttission held a meeting to consider the above-.descri�ed project. I NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved a � follows, ` i SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with: the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the (proposed use is in accord with'! the objective 0 the Development Code and the purpises E of the district in which the site is located; an4t 3 That the proposed use is in compliance with each \'of the appiicable,.proviisions of the Development Code; and ` 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detr=imental to the public health,' safety, & welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tract 12902 is approved subject to the fob owing conditions and attached Standard Conditions: 1. Grading shall be reduced on all lots through the use of natural rear yard areas or deck areas as opposed' to manufactured flat yard areas. The plan: shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to. the issuance of any permits. 2. Small retaining walls (less than 3 fezt in height) shall be incorporated into the rear yard of lots 16 and 23 to furth,.r reduce grading. The walls shall be constructed of natural materials, such as alluvial rock, consistent with the rural setting. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TRACT' 12902 -DR NORDIC March 25, 1987 Page 2 3. The driveway on Lot 1 shall be relocated to the west side of the parcel to Arovide safer ingress end egress, 4. The units on Lots 2, 3, 22, 23, 25, 26 and 27 shall be shifted to maximize the preservation of trees between units. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance Of any permits, 5. The grading of Lot 24 shall bo redesigned to minimize the alteration of land form adjacent to Hermsa Avenue. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any permits. 6. All pertinent conditions for Tract 12902, as contained in Resolution No. 86 -41, shall as)ply. 7. If a block wall along Hermosa Avenue is installed by the developer, the wall shall be constructed using tan slumpstone block. 8. The CCBR's shall require all walls visible from the public right -of -way to be constructed using a tan slumpstone block. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAA14ONCA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of :7e City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commissior of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I m €;° �y(�i #oq'sqyo `.CV aYS yp�� i�wul�i pC, y�Ly����`gjj.g9 ��� 4P yOCMM�p� 1AV M )4�y. +7 L�r Jq±LY pr _S� iany� L�'vL.y�AT 1Y GI"I B'., LV91� - V.a. Nsg ^u ��r e��q�tiY+.�`c' "':� �'`Z���1�z•• « Qr' P A -AS; P-.1 a yp c V W« i • YV I�:: ? J.lf�r try. Ir,g. j. IT ,��,'��'.. � s$�. °N.i •�, rs is 1ij t isj �zMaIl VV� . Y, 1� aCM��Y �� Lg %S mC$. z sA ri.iYr Ytl4 g`° p��` "iGS ky.. vs itw .... ga °qi`n, Yy.$ k o�ffi a isifS UN Div ac.Z+:: � 3 gfifilz a=i f $ \\ L may« .� '.���a` +��•Y` aa.ai �w wg AaiMII g 8�; ofy MW rw. g�"'.2, g.. i w y ae = e y y ,. X y' Y��• L ml F : lei >aOY OI YYw GoC >.M � f GG.q� RY �b� s C.fJC OP fIl.i.p.<pYy =<a19w0 OC4 4 040 �� (Ly �aTee6wN VY�Ia.�Y O. t....1Y3Cgq Y Luw pp Q2N. °Ciq ��C�e QQ °Yq ^3p.yL,! �pEyGi+O•�� O,e= V'Y+ n�asi 1�u aY c'•`� °pn`yysu ��� ° X.2 'as q} f ' s'LZX ena OLU y~agO�a . °OpE oT4 CV �yyav N�. V �Y ay.L^ ' =v Ln` eN M.Yt...E ~ ud NwEY� apL\i66y U O¢C N 4 `Z1 4 N6 i i Y .N -` wipz° C L�.r YNG L O�a�C6 y�y q. O C A � d u� r w �• O t� � uy �q O� 4 b M V y l "•. 4 L« 4 e V 3 V��w dL N`LG ■yy W Gyy �Y • .C.Y e�7 4 q q � r� p ` � � � a � vs >• � � 4 � N Y 9 �. { Y C Y. � C � N V � � 4y N � � L A � - O ^ R r L, 4 Cv.w 0 - i Y.L� lr � Eau �aKO N 3 L N.0 ,d = TAN {� CCa G` Neil: cNc �p A Mc- 214 E 6gVwN* An -1-1 �p LS @�wmi6 D.�� OC ?r!V2 Cx ccO N u M w N N A 4 v i 44p Y • I - MC $u SE 3-,° v Ys o s L OIO yL °��:i vrpM• � V MBA N ►S N 9My a LiC w�� « @ L; `G4y`.•i. i� qCY qti ^ N1 jY. y�OyO !Ny_i Amt C Y$ p' W +GpY Y ^aC y'VO Y` O� ^�IOQ "{MO�tlyy N +��� ^NG r 3`N 1 V:j �� °� °L V�W4MCC gCq pO2i. M4 y.yy 4 gY HS V �p■ �w L A Y C 4s V" r "gas 0.# j r Ci C L�� p Y »YO O Q Y 4 q • w L w y OC N L'O E p.Y V N Y V Y C Y O N p V L; O Y V E q w N u N _ p ^: E L 7 01 L b Viz a��.Lnr iq cs� -� iSW grc•�que��ga C G oo. .�. Q o?�[pV 3 +yC� � �. `.9Cln�.S�tl� 4Cp =�t {¢y� o by^• °.� -sY °- ",f •L `�-!'jY�• �y� V v�0 ^1,�rY C °�. C �� � L ` Y >• G ! Y L tlCC N 7 I OI � ;'= 3 VCC. � w b � Y M ° M CNG O• bCC • cO i � p 1p0. ^i y YYV Y9 V$ryy� ^y. 0g 4V Cdy 6`C CCtl 09 +a0 �.(i �. ■ y q> V N C ft ! °z u oW v�O:OW �.atv »s -t.N`o •e'° - +a -YS a 0 C: +S.x ms's`. tti�i�CC � Luaa `. .a cOSdr LL S.pO a` u'��Q pew N��d `• N ^n Vb 'V O C 9_LL q ^a.�. r. Y� p�v9 Y'� O p\ Y O o + -CC. q L '..; q:= wM y• 8 to ..�Yp V Y, an .L.� =.0 �d c{�. YBYS nq s-a ..yo acrd8 ab.,ur 9oyae. L•• • Lr. Y LL V10• Y OY L t pX'z OY� i �!g•� +C Sr S AiyY pYML CL ^+ Y 4 Z. Y Z T` ••�. = N y •.C. C e p O V �+N, .9 y V„ N +16 �., u N b 4J VYP !Yr NNYY �Y�e Ytr p YZ je-$ vO dr9''6 '°rdw a •n �a�y' 4.. •^�rYY •y.CN�Lir O� L" v'�se N c'S �y.� od.. } �Y be °` «Y '�u.nr w. Srrr ���+ S"n +M ■Mpa o-151 aN€m o mVIi�ES ? � i9�/'f V�O ��N 8CM Y� up.Yi�V.p•�Y ���� O L =�r _V b iL +Y-St- "s ai kN w F a y Y6 �.axqq�s sum µg. �N `r� � 4'Y'` 6Y. M. `aJgiML 3t �n�. N�.S C1aa�1 � l N'�..�,.�+ ' N G p {{{::: yy�( i� �ja CYg.g L i ­a. CMS. <' S.M� ., {V �.•'•LN >: SS sY Y �Y SRYN 4 f L'•1 r. A 01 •nu 7 a °Y � � 3g N y Y� O � . ° YawY.$g' i + a O a ^moo 6Y� + r V L p ^ 9 M YY, tl O Y A� O •b,• q. S r G R t Y 04 a 0 S 4r N �= Y. d r` O. VQ4 ypp ts.N.s- S.�{, -CAS Y�4 C + S� =N Y� � 8 ys 9} C LV+'�Y••pp} =� a� ~�� L� .r lYr b$C C YEN r' ptf Y a' C0+ Est.— W b >N. +.. Ygo C•Oirpgp L.X 4 sJ{ i y �i0 ^i ca.& +qii «ds ud „N.�. o� Sa aI woj�- L ^S e ^i Y'a C6Nw Nb i +.O VV �.••. i > L Y 35 ON am,- r�Y 6oSCa a dN ■_ by ii r. L Ea ru Y N Y�• +i N Ca� ? Y 1 -1Op�.. YN� ^ • �V °Y g rN �€� ' y`C L � r 6°• • .1 -48 VVCOI VpG $ : CC L r s a c ^ NY -,a- ( � S 9 C� � A `•� au N + . u an N Y ^ � p � Oi M y@ Y A M C ?'N r al ncrr� ��� �2� 2 �$ es D```id - u��• ^��a ^�.'+ bin. r ^� s�. qp :eu fwNi.� .(Ow. bL >• S @N V !•6M <{.} tb croea 1�YN +M yY SG�L C <N iN Yic Wi 6MNCS V. C r M O a �j I YyyLA. t=1 ptg� �j `e ¢ oq_pY cxp e 9_O. z 4�Z C V4 V p 0 I= iL61OIY. 9e.s • Oq 4�` sC C Y Zti r 4L� �V =�= �HSSSS.0 �u Yr 'OrY YOU 4'iC � yCCCCDI ■`' Cl 22 °{�$y ms.µ `rid' �!6`�u br °t +� 9-a XS Is roe Yy � .t -82 11 9o$ 31 --�o Zl- �o � Y. rC •� L" C Y = 9qY L 1� 8SZ• M. _� imQ.SymY_ M Y i1 y� V Al.Y end ^u s VOy. QL N9.6. ~FN� C 4 X�Y M� yypy.� ,°Q yii X11 M q 3y$� C .W41 �L 2 J 9 aiYi �r r ► 1 Q r i r... Y.41 C�Vi•3 WN� H.� a �� ` * 4 Syr 9Y.��Y.,� it H ' arm, . vwOV YE MY. vC•••••• C n 09YL Y� 7a v V' Z.- O i Y. ° M d 4\^ _N 6y;Y �. s�0. �a V f L Y iY 0.Y�n Ny}$! Y a`d _Oyi1+ La �Yp ^: �1L C�..y ` O.0.° yz .c0 NY a Uzi N� • • y'e q�a ¢1Kt1�YCS C yy ` pfGO~� �� yy Yr. N YYur YH.cMO < � V� g O e a� _.� Y-. Z G e O p• J �y G Y7 ty YY 4s1: i. L C Cli.r _ ;a! ;n e!; atin Y:0. 6 �J Y... e pyN a„ mm �o or .� L•�` 4 Ham �+ <L� p V M� . Y .NY Y 1J Yr iYYI ti jS 1bY�V I ♦ N 1.f `i6 xJENS; yy s °(� Yang (f jV) � Y D O1LL0 L i6a s " Z - 7li Oq:N qJEE S�p � V L >> `' a0i uC Aq. YY M.VO �Y Z OM�. OMN�Le \i9" 3F e gw�II�$� „« a y J O•r 1 ow Yw. N tlpY� QNC. L p9 s`o pp QC tC yp C {yT; Y�u. till VM S - ;.§ ro C1 al q �^ �J1,t i �^ Cb» Yyw N a1Q r lit "moo $o $;2, ML =O yye.NB� II� —u i_ Mai a-, am« u. IA y a roS Sly ro`o$ 3Sn� ge P v4 �y r�eo'�' �� Yc'NiF IM- `� �^°u Mai + MY'ONX 900 M M M. •G` OVy Y Y Yn W N QLL W V Y �® u a s i tw R °' �C NZ L O 4 Y O Y l �I IF-1 \ f 14 pF a1 'i I 7 N{_pppq��o>- MA dAN � N S' i. M. `. ` Y O • _�L =,� C � N8r v a° zo u- r e y ! d }Yyy V `. y�-' � G 6 �I' � � C 9. b 4 i_• G y NY F � yy3 � � .j � r ^ C ~ C b CO S K C7 � Y = ii Is CcO 15 3-11 O E. y pw,Il ,SV b �=y g `• Vx� 3 w fir$ ` w �. r�°u' 8j Ila la �rw e, -me -flit `.wig $ «; es+� S w= " °VspE_ '.�s %I �t1► • Vwtl` `Y _vw _ ■■N �`ir yM1'. S�. r EE$SS iY9pp Y <V a' WZHV :1 R { <8is°. u i LSAb" Z qo wQ <.w o � 1 Mj e3tl ZZ- I -1Z R- _wQ ai 4 ♦" an S. a $ g Qti.,, b° M e� °.• N, a 1 r am o a ft -M:2 _S g I; i3 I. "° Vx Yrg CW �mY _3 ; l Q� Is= 71 �p =8 u$cY ', •,as c4Z SzYb,;g�5° ?(q x3 all 81 �n '� $YZ% m vy a ice°. N` • KN •• = .Vg Y� OXO p VN C A 5 } w L CC g�j y 17-22 2 1 Z I irk 'j N! ;YY iyyi w7L "r y 1• L.Vb A tw t Y iiii 6_J al 0 z U. N 0 L tL '.M zi Y u po, y.�. �+w• y W F « p` M y�yy p� _` j y, p L= S Q 4Y +�11 � �^yj� v �« Sj � • � C � JJ I � � � � (. N Y — tl Yy ■,��° V `y�y — � ^.N J. p � 111 �.�.L �`� a ` «� a€ a IRS r a-- o „3 Ns �3Yt° ���y "{ .- �..�i► s` ." ��, �; 'egg e$a e� ^� • Y b v j a M Q :;$ S 3 •n i u~Iaj spa•? �« 'E a..i. '�t+l. $�• .°0..x ►«y� If 21 R HM�... = LYt.R - = � tY. — SZ Ci ►31 3it 4a K � • 40 � N � � N M! D —3q tI 11 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST"F REPORT �OCAnto'vey 1 r 1 r o� DATE: March 25, 1987 �,^a T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Russell 11.,Maguire,,City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic'Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRORWRTAL AS.-WSSMEKT - ?i GEMERAL RLAM AMENDMENT 87 -02A - I MY'�" ;"r MU �'`•" A request amend the Circulation Element of e en+era ,, Tan for the purpose of accomplishing the following changus. t 1. The extei►s,on IF Wilson Avenue, frw) /' Carnelian Street to Archibald Avenue, which includes existing roadway between Archibald ri3 Amethyst, and 1,4 mile east of Carnelian and ,a:nelian. 2. The i)eletion of Banyan Street from approximately 3700 ivet east of Haven Avenue to Wilson e'venue and the extension of Banyan Street from approximately 3700 feint east of Haven Ave +e to the it of Ftiwe',,da uenvp and Suaw ;:Avenue. 3. The ext6Mon of Wilson Avenue from approximately 400 feet a-ast of Canistej Avenue t, the east. 4. The extension of R4chftL r Aveme from Highland Avenue to north of opposed Banyan Avenue. 5. The deletion of Fiiliken Avbnue fre.v approximately 1500 feet -south of ?"i,son Avenue to Wilson Avenue along its cuwved ali- ,:gent and the extension of Milliken Avenue from 7500 f.t:`t souts of Wilson Avenue to norV4 of Wilson Av_nuti. 6. The addition of an unnaied majLir art4 ial from 24th Street to the north and being approximtely 1000 feet west of and parallel to Etiwandd Averir,el and, the extension of East Avr nue north of 24th Street. I. 1ACKKSROJII,D: These changes and additions to the Circulation Element are proposed to romplete the City's circulation system and to provide access to areas in its sphere of influence. The amendments are described in more detail below. ITEM{ E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF KPORT RE. GPA 87 -02A MARCH 25, 1987 Page 2 1. WILSON AVENUE FROM CARNELIX! STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE Wilson Avenue curenn x,, exists as a; secondary arterial ram arne can Street to 1/4 mile east as a. completed section and from Amethyst Street to Milliken Avenue as 4 largely und�svelope4 roadway planned nor in{proveme. {t to secondary standards. While its termin-.s at _*chibald Avenue, as currently shown, would provide a valuable alternate via Haven and Milliken to Archibald Avenue, further westerly extension would greatly increase its service to the City. Between the west City limits and Archbald, only Cwnelian Street will provide significant capa.ity for traffic bound south to yet to Past -west arterials. Beryl, Hellman and Nmethyit have all dezLloped with many lots rronting them which causes friction with the "collector" ;.,aracter of t)e tractfic using them now and in the future, Continuing the development of Wilson Avenue as r east -west arterial from Amethyst west to Gara3lian will relieve the Smaller north -south collectors of much of the increased traffic in the future. Diversion of traffic to Wilson front Hillside and Banyan will also relieve similar conflicts airing those streets. The alignment of this extension is across *undeveloped property except ..,� for a house at its connection with Ame i:yst Street. The alignmen was park of the county master plan of streets add some right -of -wa offers exist. The existence of, one horse on the eligranent is not seen as a serious obstacle since the ultimate connection will be many years away. Z. BANYAU So.EET The Banyan Street extension will provide an ,n erase za °.f route across the City between Wilson Avenue and Route 30 (now 19th Street - Highland Avenu. future freeway). The propf;sed alignment carries the street; along a mate which inelurfas, the portion being built; now as a p -t of the Ca,Vn Planned Conrunicj. z�t?d ,coins existing Summit Avenue i Etiwanda. 3. WI ;SQN AVENUE, EAST OF CANISTEL AVENUE This extension of Wilson venue eas o Milliken Avenue pro -Mes a circulation link for possible future development, as well as a continuation of a cross - city arterial route, if needed. 4. ROCHESTER AVENUE Rochester Avenue is included in the tarn Planned Community an a—?* qtr extend north of Banyan, should t;at area be developed. 5. WIL MN AV'.NUE The curved alignment for Milliken Avenue which is s owT n on 'theexi%tincd General Plan was dz;reloped prior to the improvements on .ae- Creek and planned improvements an Day Crrek to contrei floodiny in that area. At that time the entire area n63t o Deer Creek was contemplated to remain La developed indefinitely or b used as a regional park or undeveloped recreational area needing mintmrl access. It a;,pears now that a conventional intzrsectirin Rt�iNhbRG e(*= -UN, AAFF REPORT March 25X1987 i ;°age 3 - Aek MIT .' between Milliken and Wilson Avdjues, with 'the p4tentiat: for extensions 0, the streets, will be4ir serve the expects "circulation ` 5. El'IGlAtA AiIEN�JE - Fut�lro duvelonent of the` sp��ere of influence in' an¢�requ9re the extension of East Rvenuo north of 24th Street and an additrtlna] arterial try; the west. this westerly arterial is proposed :to be affset from Etiwanda;Avenue xo• discourage the use of Etiwarrda Avenue as a route through the r+unity } and divert, sphere traffic to Qay ECreek Bouievarri; Addition of this arterial and vihQ extenioon of East Avenue° ili campItte this circulakion gual begun ire the Etiwanda Specific Plan, [ II, zEl1'IR Staff fins completed ar, Environmental `xi-SE smeni : e pr N d amendment add,--has deteriMaed that t6re:,will be m signif;,lcan� envirc= -&ntiaj impacts, •Part:I df the Initial Study is attache.,t ftr�'. your, review, III. REZ; EIi Ifl : It is recommett &4 that,�the, Planning Commission receive ,. ppubT3"c` Vi-gz regaiit3 ng this 'proposal and,, if deemed appropriate, wecommend appravol ai, the amendmegi sir, the. City Cou )cil . :A Resolution `. is attached providing for such afendation. fi Fes Nct ��submttted R:ko 4i Attac4ments t= t•. 5i goo= Ito apuaMN3 l a,o.a t_ ! i - ,�I uayalrW raac w �. m �{ ! usouu Y � C r � ,a•imy 1 i � ii! PIeq�4],p i II u+UaH i I j I He Q p,e,faur� miza ! I � asllswe� �i IZ tz 1 j' J7�µ��iQ�{jX{gZ o rig - II y • '' `I� n� r7puan�rl3 I Y 4aauge>Daia �_�. i • i � � f � aiwy ele5 1 i usvwl a lawny � F t , i 1 u Weq'431p i 41aY1 r e• ' calla 1 t � � �{ II I its - �WeF ^ a a I m e; yr .j GENERAL For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be cumpieted and submitted to the Development Review 'C nittee through the department where the projetit application is made. Upon receipt of this application,, the Planning Division staff will prepare Par II of the Initial Study ar�d mike recommendations to Planning Commission. a Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1'j The reoject .will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative 'Dec�)arati6r will be filed, (2) The project will have a significant enviraq*ntal impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant givirg further information concerning the proposed project. Date F'i'led: March 6 1987 Project Title: Gefit,-41 P Ian ;Amendment 87 -Z2A 3. Appiicant's Name, Address, Telephone: City;of Rancho Cucamonga, P.-O. Box 807, Rancho Cuca4�ionga,,,California 91730 (714) 989 -1862 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer, City of Rancho Cucamonga, P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (714) 989 -1862 Location of Frrject: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Various.Locations Assessor's Parcel No.: N/A List ether permits necessary -rrom local;, regional, state and federal agen,'ies and ire agency issuing such permits: None .. J?h PROO CT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed project: Geieral_Plan Amendment to add arter41 '` streete ano GFfange alignojeht of cu went v designated arterial st *gets.__ Acreage, of p.�ject' area andt'square trotaga of existing and proposed'ouirdings, if any: N/A Oe%rihe the environmental setti�n of the project site including information on topography, soil-,, stain ty, plants (trees), land animals, , any cultural, t histdrical or sr -en aspects, lane! use of surrounding Properties, ,,nd the. description of 'an;p existing structures and their use (attach ne6a::s sheets). 4 _ No 'rnaCtM�tcfiian ra nc d �,r�til d_ eVel�sofi� tff 8rea's occurs. ' naA etrurt��rn of noeaihle. is orirrtt_ s nnifIcanae is wl r tthe� r...:nn � Ave r, ue }, a,� n± �tnr„�.tti Nn 1 abri will rF+�rtiru� rpy{ k: whpii gnstrLtGtioFl af. .hat t oro_i St is—scheduled. ---- -i ice_ Is the project part of a larger project, one.. of a Sariea of cumulative { actions, which although individually smaU , may as a whole have significant f envircnmental impact No Qgnst,�t p� a_ r000c�d �t this time. �J a I ''ILL MS PROJECT: YES NO _ 1. Create a suhstanti'1Al:Oange in ground contours? _ X 2. Crep'e"' a,tubst-At,al" change in existing nois? aC' produce v*�ratioA or glare? = �, X t 3. Create a subr- antial change in demand for iIbicipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, a} )3 ,, ,,. K — — . hanges in the existing Zoning or General 4, Create. c Plan designations X a r 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? �� X ' `Y 6. Create tho need for use or disposal of potentialf'y haza,,dous materials such as toxic substances flammables or explo5 -ives? X Explaq.Ation of any YES answers'abcve (attach additional sheets if necessary): t, i _GPnp_'.a1 °Plan r.r. -„lit n�LEli?itle;9 chan�p„s are nn nnen� ---- ----------- — 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project Kill generate daily, N/A 8. Estivate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: N/A 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required fo.R this project, in cubic yards : NIA 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the text page. UXTIFICATION: i hereby certify hat the statements furnished above and in the iii -ached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaiva'.ion to the best of m ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are trkie and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand That ado tional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation be can rude by the Piannii`tg Division. ' Date: March ci 1 6.. )�7 Signature: � s Title Traffic Engineer i )CA 1�3� RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ` The following information should be provided to-ths Pity of Rancho rt,ca,:�onga Planning Division 'in order to the aid school district :fin asssssing Their ability to accommodate the proposed, residential development:-' Developers are ` required to secure letters from the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of`building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract,NO.:� - a SpI ific Location of Project; �`" CHASE I' PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE d TOTAL - It'" 1. dumpier of single 4 family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: ` 3. Date proposed to = ,j begin construction: 'r 4. Earliest date of occupancy-; Modell _ and # of Tentative S„ Bedrooms Price Range t r �'!1iii l!, EXHIBIT 'A_' lop i_ The extension ff W.Uson Avenue, from Carnelian Street to Archibald Avenue, which includas existing roadway) between Archibald and Amethyst,` and 1/4 mite east of Carnelian and Carnelian. 21 The 'deletfon of Banyan Street from approximately- __�700 feet east of , ;even Avenue to liilsan Avenue aLnd the extension, of Banyan Street from r approximately 6700 fee east i, Haven Avenue to the intersection, of Etiwaoda Avenue and ;umntit Avenue. 3. The extension of' lson Avenue from approximately 400 feet east of Castistet Avenue {,o he east. 4, -J a The 'Ixtension-.Qf Rocnester Avenue f lom Highland Avenue to north of p'ropsed Banyai' Avenue. o 5« Tho deletion of %fill iken ;Avenue from approximately ISM feet south of Wilson ,Avenue „to Wilson Avenue along its curved alignment and the extension of 441liken Avenue from 1500 feet south of W`fison Avenue to north of K son Avenue.. I' 6. fhQ addition of an unnamed major arterial (from 24th Street to the north and being approximately 1000 feet crest_ of and parallel to Etiwanda'Avenue; and, the ext�ssion rf' East Avenue north of 24th f Street. ' EXHIBIT *AO `- M 1. The extension ^f Wilson Avenue,, ;from Carnelian Street to Arfklb� Avenue, wFAch includes existing roadway between Archibald and Amethyst,<14nd 1/4 mile east of Carnelian find Carnelian. r 2. The deletion, of Banyan Street from ap�raximately 3700 feet east of Hav ^n fiaenue to Wil`m Avenue and the extension of Banyan Street from app ,ximately- 3700 feet east of Haven Avenue to the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Summit Avenue.',. 3. The extension of Wilson Avenue from approximately 400 f4at east-,-, of a Cain, el Avenue to the east. 4. , Tae extension of Rochester Avenue; from Highland Avenue to wwfvi of proposeUBanyan Avenue. 5. The deletion of V iliken Avenue from approximately 1500 feet south of j Wilson Avenue, to Wilson Avenue along its curved alignment and the . *' extension of Milliken Avenue from 1500 feet south of Wilson Avenue to north of Wilson A enue. � ' 6. The addition rs', an u4niamed '; Wor arterial from 24th Street to the north,,ind beiOJ .�approxima sly 1000 feet vest of and parallel to Etiwanda Avenue; *$d, the extension of East Avenue north of 24th ,. Street. i 1 i cr RESOLUTION NO, A REibL0TI0" OF THE PLANNING C;rMSSIOk, OF THE CITY OF jr RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RECONMENOING tENDMEMI TO THE ADOPTEn . CIRCULATION ElEMENT Off' THE RANCH CUCAMOW., GENERAL PLAR TO THIN CITY COUNCIL WHEk6% the City Counel has activated the optlonal General Plan .. Amendment cycle, and , WHEREAS the P:ann3tlg:,Gtimmi:ssion, had held a Oily advertised public k $wring to consider all comments on the pr6osed General',;11' -m Amendment. NOW , THEW -ORE. BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cuca�.7nga Planninj Commissions &s hereby recommend that the City Council approve U1 following Amendment toy the circulation %Aement of the General Plan. SECTION 1: Figure III -3 shall be amended to reflect the following "t changes." 1. The extension •of Wigswn Avenue, from Caenoliah Street to Archibald Avenue, whfi � includes ,existing) roadway between Archibald and Amethyst, and 1/4 ni11l1 east of Carnelian and Carnelian. 2. The ;deletion of., Banyan Street from approximately 5 3700 feet east of Haven Avenue to Wlilsog A4en0 ,rnd the extension of Banyan S4,,reet from approximaveiy 3700 feet east of `Haven Avenue to the intersection e' of Etiwanda Avenue and Summit Avenue. 3. The extension of Wilson Avenue frma approkiptely 400 feet east of Canistel Avet.ue to the ease. 4. The extension of Rochester Avenue f►wm Highland Avenue to north of proposed Banyan Avenue. - 5. The deletion of Milliken Aver«e,frpm arsroximatc3y 15M feet south Lof Wilson Avenue` to Wilson Avenue atom its cu_•ved alignment and the extension. of Mii'iKon Avenue from 1500 fee: south be Wilson Av roue to t4orch of Wilson Avenue.' 6. he addition of an unnamed major arterial from 24th Street to the north � d being ,:pproxiwaately 1000' feet west of and paraailel to Etiwanda Avenue; and, the extension of East - Avenue north of 24th Street_ PLANNING COMMISSION RESI3RUTION N0, CPA 87 -02A - CIRCULATION ELEM,sNT March 25, 1987 r� ai r S1:CTION 2: It is recommended that aAegative Declaration be adopted fo- thiS Venera'RR an Amendment, based upon the completion and findings of tile` Initial: St +sdy. ` APPROVED AND ADOPTED'.THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH* 1987. k PLANNING COMMISSIGA OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 BY: F E. David Barker,. Chaiman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary V I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cw4ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, du hereby certify that the foregoing, Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by tta Plan�.Ing Commission of the regular City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: IYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSEtIT: 'ZOWISSIONERS: 1 ' I i i f � f . NE DATE: TO: ,FROM: BY: SUBJtJ,: CITY OF RANC O CUC a 7WONG lv STAFF AEPORT March 25,t X987 0afi,rnaF and Mem:aers of the Planning commission Brad Buller, City Planner �a Cynt5fa S. Ki:aser, Assistant Planner I i. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESaMENT,00 GENERAL PLAN Ar4ENDMENT - CITY OV - segues amen Use Elai*nt of e General Plan from Low.#ediuc4 Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units /acre) tt.<_Low Density 4 Residential (2 -4 d+wv.•lling units /acre) and/ar Yery Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling �nitQ,ar��e) for 68 acres of land located at the southwest corner,+ 'j WiIson (if extended) aid Williken (if extended) - APN. ,,Oa` -191- 11, 17. ENVIP.nNMENTAL ASSFCSMFUT AWn n9:= ADUCUT I I IIMtrnYPT w VI a`I .Irw /N uu%wuM-N% — P% Uc-4uCAL W amend the Deve opmen r c`L�T From "FC'�" (Flood Control) and "LM" (Low- Medium Density Resident,!ai - 4-?, dwelling units /acre) to "L" (Low Density Residential - 2 4- dwelling %i ts,acre) anal /or "VL1' (Very Low Density Residential less than 2 dwelling units /acre) for Fib acres of land located at the southwest corner or Wilsou (if extended, and Milliken (if extended) - APN: 201 -191- 11, 17. I. BACKGROUND: At its meeting of Febrvary 25, 1987, the Planning ommiss continued this General Plan and - Develoe:>,vnt District Amendment. The v^, - -se of continuing this ianen it was to have concurrent revieo of a related Circulation amendment and proposed subdivision map. The Circulation Element is being revised to ange the alignment of Wilson and Banyan, which .'order the site on the north and sGuth. The Meer Creek Company has submitted a - subdivision map (TT 13542) that attempts to address the Conmission's concerns of grading,, circulation, .density and land use 'Transition issues. These related item;; aee being reviewed tonigi t. ice. 9 PLANVINO COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPI '86 -33D - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO.NGA _ DDA 86,05 - CITY OF �pN� IO CUCAMEIIYG'` Marct_� d, 1987 ; Pag:: 2 II. OPTIONS: The Commission's primiYy concerns for this site have been - grading, circulation, density and land dse transition. There are two options before the Commission (please consul previous staff reports for more detail): A, That the existing Loft Medium "designation (4-8 dwelling units /acre) be changed to Low Density Reoidential (2 -4 dwelling a,nits /acre)« This 'is the property owner's preference; _ = B. That the subject site be changed to Very Low ° Density Residential (less thar, 2 dwelling units /acre) per the Commission's previous request. Alternative A: This d °_signation would pr3vide an adequate transition of densities;_ with the 6,000 .square foot lots south of Lanyan1,`,, However, the' north portion Y -,the site. abutts Deer Creek (1 acra rots) where the transition Wire be more abrupt. On 'December 3, 1186, the Deer Creek Ca:Npany smbmitted a Tentative Tract Map (TT 13542) to staff. The Commission may refer to the staff report on TT 13542, that will be discussed later thi -, e t,ning,.to s -e k4 this site may ue developed at a Low Density s(°Jr} hd. if the Pla& -P ng Commission Oetermines that Lbw Density Resider, ;,al is the approk {d ate General Place ;ml Development District designation, the Tentative Tract Map will c, := inue through the prci;ess. Alternative B: The Commission has requested the ",alternative of Very Lew~ Residential on the subject site. The Very Low designation would work more t `fectively with equestrian trails and w ^uld require less gradi'ra : <+ ae site. This designation would rr pvidn an apprtrpriate transitiz,y of density adjacent to the Deer Creek project. However, the transit'on to the area souch of Banyan designated as Low - Medium would ^epresent a two -step change (Very Low: to Low- Mn,.dium), and would t -- ;less appropriate. III. EWIROKNWAL ASSESSMENT: The Initial, Stut,r has been completed ff`r both the Low an Very inw designations by staff and ti9 signfYicalill adverse environmental impacts were identifit.! to be ass, -iated with either alternative. AWL 0701 -02 .3-29-87 PC Agenda, + PLAWNING COMMISSION STAFF REPur4 -T GPA 86 -03D CITY OF RANCHO WC ?,MNGA DDA 86 -05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUC1J4'ONGA (larch 25, 1987 Page 3 AOL IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of the su ect eneM�a an Amendment and Development District Amendment decide that` the change would promote the land use goals and Policies of the General Plan, would''not be materially detrimental to the adjacent properties, or would not cause significant advers enviromental impacts, the fallowing are the findings that art necessary upon arrival: A. The Amendments do not conflict with the Land Ilse Policies of the Gener4l,klen; and B. The Amendments do promote goals of the Land use Element; and C. The Amendments would not be materially injurious or detriment&1 to the adjacent properties; and D. That tie subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in surrounding areas. � V. th RRESPOND" E: This r:. +�R has been advertised as a public hearing e a j y e orn�rspaper. The property was posted, and c�ces rare sen o a;I property owners within 300 feet of the project site. FVI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff rx requesting direction as to the most approi,r a _ —de-signatioa for the property. Resolutions are attached for both Low and Very Lvs Densfty Residential designations. If the i Commission seifects one of these options, approval of the appropriate Rovalution of Approval is necessary.. Re! fful ly Witted, L B t er City Tanner BB:CK :te Attachments: Staff Report of September 24, 1987 Staff Report of January 14, 1987 Staff Report of February 25, 1987 Resolutions of App:-,Qvai DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY G.F RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA; STAFF REPORT" U1 February 25, 1987 1977 "I Chaf,inan and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Cynthia S, Kinser, Assistant Planner ENVIPONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86••03D -M17-0E-M=O cucARoN A - A request to amend the 7and Zs_eElement of the General Plan from Low-Medium Density Residentitl (4-8 dwelling units/acre) to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre) and/or Very Low (less Density Residential than 2 dwelling units/acre) for 68 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Wilson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APNi 201 -191- 11, 17. ENVT,RONM_ NTAL ASSESSMENT AND - DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT X:AKENT 86-0b - CrTy OF" RANCHO CUCAMONGA_____V request --�Y amend the Development District- i p from uFC" (Flood Control) and %M11 ( Low-Medium Density Residential 4-8 dwelling units/acre) Ito %" (Low Density Residential 2-4 dwelling units/acre)' and/or "VL" (Very Low Density Residential - less than 2 dwelling units/acre) for 68 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Wilson (if %4xtended) and Milliken (if extended) - APN: 201-191- 11, 11. I. BACKGROUND: At the Planniqq Commission meting of January ,4, - igal, CODL,Ssion continued this General Plan Amendment to Februa-y 25, 1987 for the Deer Creek Company to submit a subdiv.sion map. The subdivision map would address the Commission's concerns of grading, circulation, density and land use ,.ransition issues on the subject site. II. REVIEW: The subdivision map (TT13542) was submitted to staff for review . The map has proceeded through Design Review and is scheduled to be heard by the Planning Co fission on March 25, 1987. The map, however, is inconsistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Staff is currently in the process of revising the Circulation Element of the General Plan. One of the Items to be revised is the alignment of Wilson and Milliken from its currently curved Planning--'Comm A�gen:d� '- GPA 85 03D. CIiY 6F IIU CUGkM4NGA :r , February 25., 19+37 Page 2 connection'-'to a conventiottal 9& intersection.....fiwiilsoil is the northern boundary of the sabject site.;, The circulatiar► element is k scheduled to be- heard by the Planning "Comdssion on March 25, 1987. As this revision will affect the submitted map and, G, therefOre, d-eLermination of this G€neral Plan and Developmp t `t District Ameodliera, staff requests these amendients be contin4i" _ ,r March 25, 1Q$7 {--Ihhe'e all related Itens imy be heard, _ z w Ili. RECt N!?A11.0H. Staff requests that the Planning Comission cgrant a con" n#`uanc`e of the General Plan and Development District I Amendment to March; 25, 1987. ` Res ally su , ,A s ra Buller City Plann BS:CK:vC Attachments: Staff Report df "reptember 24, 1987 Staff Report of Janory 14, 1987 r�Y 1' DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 Jana' fy 14, 187 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commissicn Brad Buller, ;City Planner Cyrthfi S. Kinser, Assistant Planner c ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENEP& PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -03D }' request amen a an Uie amen o the, -Plan from Low - Medium, Density R ^sidential (4 -8 dwelling units /acre) to` Low residential M -4 duelling units /acre) and /or Very Lore` Density "Residential (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) for 68 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Wilson (if extended) and Milliken: (if extended) - APN: 201 -141 11, 17. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT request to amend the Devel opment 0i s r c p Fame "FC " "' (Flood Control) and "LM" (Low- Mediu(l Density Residential - 4 -8 dw0ling units /acre) to "L" 0w Density Residential - 2 -4 dwelling units /acre) and /or"y "VL" (Very Low Dens,,ty Residential - lets than 2 eselling units /'acre) for 68 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Wilson. � (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APR: 201 -191 11, 17. 1. BACKGROUND: At the Planning Commission meeting of September 24, I a38" request to change the General Plan Land Use Map from Low- Medium Density Pesidentia` ( -8 dwelling units /acre) to Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units /ac, r) in conjunction with a Development Districts Amendment was revie -ed. This request was initiated by City Council. (Please see the attached September 24, 1986 staff report for more detail's ) At the Commission meeting, concern was r�1sed as to whether Low density Residential was an appropriate transitional designation from surrounding land uses (Exhibit "9 ). The property owner also asked that he be given the opportunity to prepare conce;tual plans for the subject site, and present the plan to the Planning Commission prior to decisions on the pro,<,',ty being made. r PLANNING COMISSION `AFF REPORT r GPA 86 -03D b „k)OA 86• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 14, 1981 Page 2 The Comdssion continued this General Flan Amendment and Development District Amendment in order for the landowner to provide a ' conceptual plan consistent with the Low Density designation. Staff was requested to provide options at both time Low and Very Lo71 designations. II, OPTIONS AVAILABLE: There are two options available to the comm3ssion: (A) That thii Low- Medium designation to be changed tc Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units /acre). This is consistent with the property owners preferenr.e. (B) That the subject; sitD to be changei to Very Low Density Residential (1Pss zrtan 2 dwelling units /acre) per the Commission's paevious discussions. Alternative A. The property owner would prefer that th& subject itebee ”- changed Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling unitstacre) Tk!,s designation would permit single family residences on lots-' of 8,000 square feet average minimum. This designation woW d provide an adequate transition of densities to south of Banyan's average of 6,000 square foot tots. However, the north portion of the site :abutts .-,er Creek with its 1 acre lots and the transition would be more absdpt. On December 3, 1986, a representative of the property owner submitted a tentative tract map application to divide the property Into 203 single family lots at a density of 3.05 dwelling units per acre (Exhibit "B"). Parcels proposed for the site range in size from 8,562 squire feet to 18,940 square feet with an average lot side of 10,944 square feet in area. The lots are generally located on cul -de -sac streets coming off of the major north -south circulation spine connecting Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street which creates a number of sub - neighborhoods within the project. While no unit product type has been submitted as part of this application, discussions with the the applicant indicate that resirences constructed on stem walls with raised wood floors are berg considered. As a result, the only grading that will be necessary will be for construction of the streets and associated imrrovements. It is important to note that no action is being requested on fire tentative tract map application at this time. The tract map is provided purely as an infgrmational aid to conceptually depict how the site c`o -uMe developed at the Low Density Residential fi t Yt .t ♦T., PLANNING COMMISSION ^rAFF REPORT GPA 86 -03C & ODA 86• - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 14, 1987: Page 3 '1 standards. If the Planning Commission does determine that LLw Density Residential' is the appropriate General Plan and Development District Designation, tbe•tentative tract map will continue through the committee process so technical and design issues can be r,�olved prior to formal action by title Planning Commission. Alternative B: The Commission has requested the alternative of Very Cow Density Residential on the suhtict site. This designation requires 22,504 square fort lots and is normally associated with an extensive tail system and an environment conducive to equestrial use. If designated Very Low, appr� ,fttely 00 dwellings would be permitted on the, site by the General Plan„ though if"developed under the City's Basic Standards as a conventional subdivision, a mer- realistic potential would be around 100 units— The:.exact number would of course depend on:the specifics of design, The Very Low designation would provide an appropriate transition in density on the north, adjacent to the Deer Creek project. Howover the transition to the area south of Banyan designated Low - Medium would represent a two -step change (Very Low, Ito Low - Medium), and would as a rssult be less appropriate. III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Thc Initial Study has been completed for both the Low ano very= w designations by straff an no significant adverse environm(''ntal impacts were identified to be associated with either alternative. IV. FACTS FOR FI61NG: Should the Commission, upon examination of the su ec enenTT_PTan Amendment and Development District Amendment, decide that the change. would promote the land use goals and policies General, Plan, would not be materially detrimental to o adjacent properties or would not cause significant adverse environmental impact's, the following are the findings that are necessary upon approval; A. The Amendments do not conflict with the Land Use Policies of` the General Plan; and B. The Amendments do promote goals of the Land Use Element; and C. The Amendments would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties; and D. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in surrounding areas. `a PLANNING C00ttSLON —AFF REPORT v G.PA 86 -03U'& DDA 86• - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 24, 1987 Page 4 '? VI. CORRSPONQEfdGfe This item has been advertised as a public hearing n The i ;1t'e ort newspaper. The property was posted, and t'srt ces were 'sent all property owners within 300. fet of the r, project site. VII. RECOMMEN®ATIONi Staff is requesting direction as to the most appropr a esYgnation for tha, property. Resol-utions are attar ed for hot and'Very fow Density Residential designat3ons. If�the 'Cis selects of one of these options, approval of the ap rop to Resolution of Approval is necessary. Respec 1 submitted, i� tom"` 1 Brad �6 er City P, armlet sx I BB: :vC ! Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Land Oise }=c. Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Tract Plan Minutes of Septem�ar 24, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting Staff Report - September Z't 2986 Resolutions of Approval l F-10 f lull .5i� 3a1,Ri z� ;_�J H ill ������1� ��� � p SEA • o • Asa *9 q Ra, w � Z /will 1,11 jj� 3� pill :ggl 11 Ig f uciii�IT x i �f t I t a d ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 86-04 CITY request to amen a eve opm-en i s rict map 'rr``' u ac ; to "Op" (Office /professional ) for , acres of tan located an the south side of Foothill Boulevard, _1126 feet/ Vest of Hellman Avenue (9113 Foothill Brlevard) - APN 208- 241 - i Alan Warren, Aswiate Plflniar, presented the staff report.'' ,r Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. (' Ryan Sellers, 13106 McKinley ;avenue, Chino, urged approval of the request. Stile Lucas, 9488 Apricot, Rancho Cucamonga, supported the request on behalf of the adjacent property <ywner. There were no fuvther comments, therefore the public Eataring was closed. y. Motion Mev�d by Stout, seconded by Tai :stay, to recommend approval of Environmental Assessment r and General Plan Amendaenv 86-03 C to the City Council. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS STQUT, TOLSTOY, BARKER, a& 1Z4,, MCNIEL , COM MISUONERS: %OWE ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS WME - carriea Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded bp, Barker, to recommend approval o Environmental Ascegment and Development District Amendment 8(j-04 to the Citr Council. Motion carried by the following vote: : AYES: COMMASSIttNERS STOUT, BARKER, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY j NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS NONE cam: d mw WWW ' — my OF request o amen a an use em. o :e enera an roma diuma Density Residential (a -8 du /ac) to Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) for 68 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Nilson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APN 201 -191- 11, 17. Planning Commission Minutes -19- September 24, 19 SMW AM DMOMIr 0IM6TI, MNNT 86-06 CITY • A reques o amend the eve - cipenis rte; a`i °pfr- as ° 5n ro I and "LM" (Low Medivat Den sity'Asidential - 4_A du /ac) to "L" (Low Density Residential - 2 -4 du /ac) for 6'i acres of land iocated g at the southwest corner of Wilson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) APH 201- 191 -11, 17+ Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner, Presented the staff report. Chairman Stout,. stated that he thought the County's foothill Com munity Plan s showed Wilson extended across to Stiwanda. Paul Rougeau, City "Traffic Engineer eXpiained that the Foothill Community Plan shone a strii in the general vicinity of Wilson which extends across to 24th Street in Etiwanda. He advised that Banyan is to extend to Etiwanda and that staff would be initiating an amendment to the City's Circulation Plan in the very near future. He further stated that the issue needs to be more closely studied as to whether the curve from Wilson to Milliken should be retained. Chairnac stout was concerned that it looks like the City has turned its back j on the area north of Highland. He suggested that if the City was gain to correct Banyan on the Circulation Plan, Wilson should be studied at the same time. He then opened the public hearing, Tracy Lowman Tibbels, 10522 Wilson, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the Commission ANIL on behalf of himtself as a resident and also on behalf of the landowners. He felt that 2 -4 units per acre was a seemingly appropriate designation for this site. He suggested that the Comission continue its decision on this amendment fog-` 90 days to allow the landowner to meet with City staff, surrounding homeowners and Chaffey College. He indicated that the landowner would then bring a project proposal to City. Jim Delorie, representing Chaffey College, supported the L"ow. Oensity designation. He pointed aat that an the east border of the college there not only are atheletic fields, but; also undeveloped i'add that has been designated by the college specifically for field study. Further, that the college had no intention of ever developing that land. He encouraged discussions between the landowner and,the College in order to develop a more coherent idea of how the land will be used There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Chairman Stout frtated that he would like to see what the project proposal might look like on this site. He felt this sight be an appropriate direction to take prior to making a decision on the arendeent. Planning Commission Minutes -20 SeptzAer 24, 1956 �1 Commissiwv*r Barker stated that he had no hesitiincy in voting at this time. He stated that the appropriate designation should be Very Low. 'Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he was ot� the Commission at the time the reap was `tied -on this piece of property and one of the things the Commission was quitie concerned about was the edge treatment between the College and this site. He explained that-At was decided at that time that the higher density would allow clustering of the units and provide open space. k) thought that she final project mit1gated the concerns of the De-or Creek residents in that it allowed transition between their property and this project and the clustering of bufldin'IIV open space and the edge treatment also addressed itself to the College s needs. It seemed that the reason the project was never boat was because it was not economiccaly feafiblO to do so., fie pointed out thet if the project was developed at a units per acre, there would be a terrible grading problem. He felt that the Low designation would not provide a proper tr jsitioo and the only project alternative would be Very Low. Commissioner Chitiea scatted that her, inclinations were the same and 1�agreed that Very Low seemed to be the appropriate designation. Co+maissioner Mclliel stated that he did not have an objection to the Low designation. , Otto Kroutii, Senior Planna,,�, advised that the Ciix;; is the applicant on this amendment request. He asked counsel if the City could reinitiate the amendment and readvertise it In this General Plan cyle as a requesf for Very Low density. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, advised that if = t City is will?ng tole li withdraw its request, it could reinitiate an amendment to Very Low. Joe Sevilla, representing the Pennhill Corporation, advised that some conceptual plans had been suWitted en this project to ,:,City staff. He felt that the request for the continuance would give everyone the opportunity to see what a good developer can do with this piece flf property. He felt that he could solve all of the concerns of everyone involved. He asked for time to approach Cha #fey College and the deer Creek Homeowners to show them the canceptual'plans ar then present they to the Commission before they. make a decision on this pieop;of property. Mr. Buller pointe „out that this amendment is for land use and the applicant could Come back with a proposal, but there would be no guarantee that this is the way the project would be built. He suggested that if the Commission's direction would be to continue the amendment request for 00 days, staff could advertise the amendment as either Low or Very Low. He asked if the Cormaission would like the propose by the applicant to be conceptual or should the applicant file a tentative map concurrently with the amendment. Planning Commission Minutes -21- Septftber 24, 19 Commisst,�„er Tolstoy stated that the problem he would have with filing the { tentative map concurrently, is that if the Comaissitn feels the site should he Very Low, the applicant would have made the expense of designing "iie tract at the Low designation, Sam Sterpa,p{l'f Glen Oaks, Glendale, California, property owner, was concerned that"the l;omeission was-.once again considering reducing the density on his property. He advised he has been in negotiationr�- with this Project many times. He did not feel he could find a buyer who would be wilding to ccapl�_'�d th one or °one -half acre lots if below the property there is a 12 unit per, acre project. He advised that while he wi;*$'d not be extremely happy about it, he would accept the 2 -4 unit per acre -:designation. He stated that a Very Low designation would seriously >inhibit thce warkatability of the property. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by McNial, to continue the public hearing for Environmental Assessmena and General Plan ARAndRent 86430 and Envi;rormentai Assessment and Development District 86 -p5 to the January 14, 1987 Planning Ce mission meeting.: The landowner is to supply the Co mission with a ct "ptual plan at the Low designation. The conceptual plan is to become a part of the permartnt record for comparison of future applications, Staff was directed to provide options at both the Low and Very Low designations. M. "a rian Tram urTaceir=roressionar ro 14edium Density Residential (4-14 du/ac) for 3,56 acres of land located at the southaast corner of Church and Archibald - APN 1077- 332 -26. °0P' t4 —K—_(8;;T d1Vac) for 3.56 acres of land located at the southeast. corner of Church anCArchibaid - ApN 1077- 332 -26. Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. _ Chairman Stoat asked for clarifi es tioa as to why this amendment was proposed. Brad Buller, City Plainer, advised that the City Council directed that all Office Professional parcels in the City outside the Haven Corridor be re- evaluated. Chairman Stow. opened the public hearing. Lloyd Michael, 6320 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga:, co -owner of the parcel, opposed the amendment. He did not agree that all 1)ffice professional should be located on Haven Avenue and felt the property was appropriately designated. Planning Commission Minutes -22- September 24, 1986 CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CU(,.,LYtONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Septtmber 241, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission) FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN MENDMENT 86 -03D - MTTVfF''TiATR;f reques o amen a an Use Element of 'the Plan from Low Medium Density Residential (4 -B di/ac) to Low wig ity Residential (2 -4 du /ac) for 66 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Wilson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APN 291- 191 -11„ 17. ENVIRONMENTIL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT A14ERDMER`i" 85 -0 - A request to amend —the Development District p —from "FC" (Flood Control) and "LM" (Low Medium Density Residential - 4 -8 du /ac) to "L" (Low Density Residential - 2 -4 du /ac) for 56 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Wilson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APN 201 - 191 -11, 17. I. ABSTRACT: Recently, the City Council directed the staff to in a e a General Plan Amendment for the area east of Chaffey College bounded by Wilson, Banyan and Deer Creek Channel. The request is for a change from LM (4 -8 du /ac) to L (2 -4 du /ac). In conjunction with this Amendment, staff has initiated a neveloptfient District Amendment, from LM and FC to L to assure consistency between the General Plan and Development District Maps (see Exhibit- 119). II. BACKGROUND: In 1982, the Planning Commission approved a ievveeiopment proposal (TT 11550) for 508 condominiums and 8 single family dwellings for majority of the site. In 1964, the Planning Commission approved an extension for the tract map for two years. In June of this year, the project proponent requested an extension again, but it was denied by the Planning Commission. The project expired in July of this year. The easternmost 140 feet of the area, bounded by the college, Wilson, Banyan and the Channel (see Exhibit "B "), is currently designated FC on the Development Di tract Map, LM of the General Plan, and belongs to the Flood Control District. In order to avoid fragmentation of future land use, this 140` foot wide strip is F-16 PLANNING COMMISSION s V REPORT GPA 85 -03D - C17Y OF /�CHO CUCAMONGA September 24, I986 Page 2 inc,uded ir.- this Amendment. If approved, this Amendment would result in t6 entice area being designated L under, boo the General Plan and the Development Code. The Flood Control District is not opposed to the change. III. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requ— esstted Change: 1) The General Plant Land Use Map rem LOW edfu-n-FlYansity Residential (4-8 du /ae) to T Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac),'and 2) The Development District Map .from Lori Medium Residential (4-05 du /ac) /Flood Control to Low Residential (2- �,du /arj.; B. Location: South side of Wilson X enue (if extended) and west o era ANe {Rue (if extended). c. Parcel Size: %�cres of land. D. Existing Lani!; -Use: Vacant, undeveloped. E. Surroundino� �Land Use �and �Zoning: or - ERIstingg s ng�e Wfl residential (Geer Creek), designated uP"v- CQo`+c Residential (less than 2 du /ac) vacant designated Very Loan Residential (less than 2 du /ac). South - Vacant,- designated Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) East Vr:°ant, designatV ,Flood Control:, West Chaffay Ccllege, designated L ^-- .a &dium Residential (44 du/ac). G. General Plan Designations: Pro ec e - M-Medi nsity Residential (4 -P du /ac). North Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du/ac). South Low- Modium Density Residential it-S du /ac). East - Flood Control. West Chaffey College (Public Faeil£ ties). IV. ANALYSIS: The site is situated between properties with General lane isgnao ions of `fiery Low (less th„n 2 du /ac) to the north, and Lore - Medium (4 -8 du/ac) to the south. As a result, there is a lack of appropriate transition in land use. To make matters worse, the existing Deer Creek subdivisioia on the north side of Wilson, is developed in one acre residential lots, while tie subject site permits developot. .` of up to 8 du /ac. This raises obvious compatibility questions, particularly 0 ong Wilson Avenue. F-1 7 PLANNING COMMISSION S F REPORT GPA 86 -030 - CITY OF NCHO CUCAMWGA September c4, 1986 F Page 3 The subject site is also situated betw(-_n a semi -rural and park- like col "ege campus to the west and a large Flood Control area to the east. ' Again,-the existing General Plan designation does not provide for an appropriate transition of,land use.' Proposed` change to Low Density Residential i2 -4 du/ac) would appear to provide for better land use transitions, while accommodating a reasonable level of development compatible with all surr,�.ending land uses. ; The General Plan describes the Low Density category a�,� follows: ,c "The `,,ow -density ksidential classification is characterized by single - family homes. The density is appropriate varerC the traditional neighborhood character of detac!ed single- family units prevails and where the level of service including roads, shopping and recreation are-not sufficient to justify a higher density.° r The subject area is sEA- rural in nature and characterized by detached single - family homes with, no commercial establishments or ppOlic recreation facilities nearb�v. The proposed chance± to low Density Residential appears consistent with the .General Plan criteria in all respects. V. ENVIRONMENTAL A&ZESSMENT, The Initial Study has been completed by staff and no s gn cant`- a�e°rse environmental impacts waee identified to be associated with WN proposal. FACTS FOL rIXDZNGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of the su W-R General Plan Amena nt and Development District Amendment, decide that the change would proaKte We land use goals and policies of the General Plan,, would not be materially detrimental to the sdjacent troperties or would'not cause significant adverse environmental impacts, the following are the findings that are necessary upon approval A. The Amendments do not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan; and B. The Amendments do promote goals of the Land Use Eiez mot; and C. The Amendments would not be materially fnjuriuus ur detrimental to the adjacent properties; and D. That the subject propirty is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, site,; `ad crmpatibility with t, existing land use in surrounding areas. r � �0, iiEPtbRT' i � C CiHE'+ LUCAN014GP� GFA S 6 -0 4� C TY tept6ker 243 Page 4 } This item iias been advertised as a pudic hearing in The YI CORRESPONDENCE: eras Posted , and notices were semi The property a p "p .:z s aper. ty or the Project site. ` owners within 300 fef a a :poperty Yii. PECt;Pd4MOATIog, Staff rrc'oemnds approval of the , flda�nts. If the Developwnt 1 �. Resolu ns i-` ss on ids warr�i�i ndmetac ption of the attached Resolutions District Map the General Pi an and <t recomw ading amoral .to the City Couriell taf G. 3nd;, t1e issuance of a Negative pEYelopaeent Strictencnt5 Declaration 4ouj , be a�,_ >opriate. 1 : ted VeripuS% r b arr�er BB :RY:ko Exhibit NAN - geneeai plan and Bevel.*"nt bistr�ict idaps . Attachments: Exhibit a - 'Flood Control Property Aesolution'of Approval ' � f PaxtC= -- " _ _ - 1 chaffey College General Play L .. Lh.® LM 3 1 a- Y.... FG CA1RYAiI PLAAIPlPt) r "f _ p�� ' ctDMMC4tl6 Y i� Development Districts wt)ItTE l i cl�c�� or. - X15 - 0 3 1TCi1 _ , — r _ RANCHO C,C NIONCpl. TITU 1'1.ANN1 \G DIVIS1UV — a , a +.as• LSOM NOIM -1 ` E r l li EI ;..;; i 11 RESOy?TION NO, f .� A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAN' i///11G COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CALI'4RNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CSIAEWAL PLAN AMENcTENT NO. 86 -030, AME4` Ira THE ELEMENT IRE RE R,4KH0 r-71 AMONGA GENERAL PLAM FROM LOW MEDIUM DENSITY �ESIDENT,AL (4 -8 DWELLING KNITS /ACRE) TO LOW DENSITY !,2SIDE.NTIAL (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS /ACRE) FOR 68 ACRES ON'"!HE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXTENSIONS OF WILSON AND MILLIKEN. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 86 -03D. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby makes th,zfolIow h- q-TT'1 n s: i A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be materially in3urious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. SECTION 2: The General Plan Land Use iiap shall be amended as follows: From Lori- Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling Unitz /acre) to Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units /acre) for 68 acres on the southwest corner of the extensions of Wilson and Milliken': - APN 201 - 191 -11, 17. SECTION 3: A Neg"'vve Declaration is hereby recomh@nded for adoption by f Y Council for this General Plan Amendment, based upon ,the completion and findings of the Initial Study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend approve, of General Plan Amendment No. 86 -03D to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DRY OF MARCH, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION rr TPE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary F—A' pLAauu� £ar��s�GN '��s�rt.�tl'xo" GENERAL 8[ AN AIWD?N $6 -t33Q " r March 25, 1981 ` Page 2 4 I, Brad Butler, Deputy Secretary of t1he „Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, da heresy certify that the foregoing giesolut on was duly and rniplarly intraduced, potted, and adopted by the Planning Co ziin of the I Cj y , of Rancho Curamor o;, at a requl,art meeting of the Planning Conini ss on held on the 25th day of March, 1.987, b,l he fcllowir. :g vota -to -fit. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMISS'ONERS.; ABSENT CGMISSIONERSe I r7 F i - I RESOLUTION N0. r A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPPOVAL OF DISTRJGT ,NGE NO. 86 -05 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTn.: , DES -1WP 4TI0N FROM " FC" r AND "LM" TO "L" F04 68 ACRES LOCATED A'lr THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXTENSIONS OF WILSON AND MILLIKEN - ,.,APN 201- 191 -11, 17. WHEREAS, on the 15th day of July, 1986, an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of`March, 1987, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Sectiu- 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the fol i owing`TTRTngs: 1. That the subject property is sui�ible too the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surw ding_ area; and 2. That the proposed district cC? nge would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance F with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that t this projec w not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on March 25, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commissit;n of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recomaerls approval on the 25th day of March, 1987, Distric( Change No. 86 -05. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt District Change No. 86 -05. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution ?,nd related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council PLANNNING COMRISSIUM R5SOLUTION MOB DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 86 -05 March 25, 1987 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1987. ; PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ' E. 5avid ar, er, a r5aR K. ATTEST: Brail euller,-W-uty—SicreAtary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do here4y certify th t the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and ad�ttd by the Planning Cowdssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular)' �e eting of the Planning Commission herd me l,+ on the 25th day of March, 1'987, by the vote-to.-wit: (f 11 AYES: CiVISSIONERS: `. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: I' ` ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1p 'I i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMIbSION OF THE CITY OF y RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 85 -.030 MENDING THE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN FROM LOW - MEOIUM'DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 ZWELLINh UNITS/ACRE) TO VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE) FOR 68 ACRES ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXTENSIONS OF WILSON AND MILLIKEN. WHERf4S_ the Planning Commission has held, a duly advertised public hearing to corsider';.all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 86 -03D, SECTION 1 :\",The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby makes the follow ng n nss, A. The Widi'--nt does not conflict with the Land Use Pa >lciev,4 the General Flan. B. The Amen',,°�rri� promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. SECTION 2: The General Flan Land Use Map shall be amended followsc From Low - Medium Density Restdentiat -44-8 dwelling units /acre) to Very Low Density residential (Less than 2 dwelling units /acre) for 68 acres o►. southwest corner of the extensions of Wilson, and Milliken - APH 201 - 191 -11, 17.._; SECTION 3• A Negative Declaration is hereby recommended for adoption by —W—My— Council for this General Plan Amenatnent, based upon the completion and findings of -the Initial Study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 86 -03D to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David 3r er, Chairman ATTEST: is Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary " -Ab PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GENERAL PLAN RMENOMM NO. 86 -030 March 25, 1987 Page 2 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary the Planning of Commission of the City of Ranchc,Cucamonga, do,.h2reby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, and adopted by the Planning�-,Commission the (t i passed, of City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Flanntig Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES, COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERSF ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r . Y t / F �7 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION' RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 86 -05 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM "FC 6 LM" TO "VL" FOR 68 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXTENSIONS OF WILSON AND MILLIKEN APR 201- 191 -11, 17. WHEREAS, on the 15th day of July, 1986, an application\ was filed and,, accepted on the above - described project; And WHEREAS, on the 25th day of March, 1987, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1, The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has wade the following n, n9s 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change w6uld not have significant impact on the environment nor the _ surrounding properties• and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commaissie has found that this proJec wi aot create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on March 25, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: I. That pursrAnt to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California -; Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of March, 1987, District Change No. €9,05. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt District Change No. 86 -05. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. � u "NING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT DISTIIICT AMENDMW 85-05 March 25, 1987 Page 2 N' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1987. PLANNINR COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM8GA j r a e: 8Y: \. .; . David Barker, 4s a rman ATTEST: Brad u erg, pu y Wretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Corsaission of the City of Rancho Cucamoi:ga, do hereby certify that the fOregoing Resolutloo was duly artd regularly introduced, passed, andalopted by the Planning Caaarissian of the City of Rancho CJlcawanga, at a regular �aeeting of the Planning Coantis ion held x., on the 25th day of F{arch, 1987, by the fallowing vutie- to -Xmit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: o ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 7 LJ E DATE: TO, FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONsA STAFF REPORT I w e iti March 25, 1987 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13542 - DEER custom lot s ivls-Ron o single ai y parcels on 66.65 acres of land in the Low Medium Density Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per aT -e), located east of Ghaffey College between, Wilson Aven�• and Banyan Street - APN 201- 191 -17 aitd a portion of 201i-191 11. I. ABSTRACT Earlier during this meeting, the Planning Commission rev ewe General Plan Amendment 87 -02A tq modify the Circulation Element, and reviewed General Plan Amendment 86 -03D and Development District Amendment 86 -05 to modify the land use and Development District from Low - Medium Density Residential to tow or Very Low Density Residential. If the Planning Commission recommends aproval of the Circulation Element modification and the change frm Low - Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential, the Planning Commission may consider Tentative Tract 13542 Cased on the merits of the project. If the Planning Commission recommends denial of the Circulation Element and /or recommends approval of a Very Low Density Residential designation, the Planning rgmmission may deny Tentative Tract 13542 based on inconsistencies with the General Plan and Development Code or may continue this item until the General Plan Amendments and Development District Amendment have been heard by the City Council. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the subdivision design, conceptual grading plan, and issuance of a negative declaration for a 206 lot custom subdivision. B. Project Density: 3.19 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin Nort - Single Family ResiTeintial and Vacant, Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du /ac) South - Vacant, Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) East - Deer Creek Channel, Flood Control West - Chdffey College, Low Medium Density Residential (4 -3 du/a%;). ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RF!PPRT TENTATIVE, TRACT,; "_�k— DEER CREEK March 25, le-"7 Page 2 t _�a ° 0. General Plan Designations. Esroject —te: = Lo►v Medium Density Residential {4 -8 du,/ac} Borth - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du /act- South - Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dulac) East - Floo,: Control West - Chaffey College E. Site Characteristics: The site. is currently vacant with the slope or approximate y 8% from north to south.. The sits: is bounded by the Wilsor, Avenue extension to the north, and peer Creek Chdnnel to the east, the Banyan Street Qxten5ion yta the so-�th, and the Chaffey College Stadium, baseball field, and;' parking lots to thE.,west. III. ANALYSIS: A. Ca�ckg_rooun'd- On July 14, 1982 the Planning Commission approved' enter a '"tract 11550 consisting of 508 condominiums and 8 singl, e family residences. The plan .ailed for the single family- residences fronting on to Wilson Avenue to be. on 1 acre lots to provide a more gradual transition from the existing 36,000 square foot lots on the north side of Wilson Avenue, 41so, the majoritf, of the area located adjacent to Chaffey j tollege was dev.'ed to recreation and open space area to buffer the residential units from the activities taking place at Chaffey College. On June 11, 1986, 7 ntative Tract 11550 came before the Planning Commission requesting a final one year extension of time. At that tine, the Commission__stated their concerns about the development not meetir- the energy conservation requirements, the compatibility with the surrounding area, and the adequacy of the circulation system proposed for the site and surrounding area. As a result, the time extension was denied._ Following the Planning Commission "s denial of the time extension fo:- Tentative Tract 11550, the City Council initiated a General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment to e::alore the options of Low or Very Low Density Residential designations for the site. PLANNING CpMMISSIP3i STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE T► ACT 13542 - DEER CREEK March 25, 1987` Page 3 r } B. General Thee ting a' proposal of single applicant is submit iZy `homes that they reel addresses the :concerns expressed by the City. The development of the 206 lots will in result an overall density of 3.09 dwelling units per acre, this would provide a; snioother transition between the Very Low Density Residential Designation to the north 'and the Lour Medium Density Residential Designation located to tae south of the project. The lots proposed for the project range in size from 8,730 square feet, to 19,547 square: feet in area with a average of 10,923. °.square, feet in area. Also, the applicant is proposing to extend Wils�,n Avenue and Banyan,Street to the Deer _Creek Channel thus allowing for the future connections to Mfiliken Avemie. The apolicant,is also proposina a public street that will corinect k lean Avenue and Banyan Street. f., C. Design Review Committee: The Design h'eview /,�6mmittee (D. Ber, er, 0. o.eman , reviewed the project on jat.dary 22, 1987, i and recommenced approval subject t'a,the following conditions: f 1. The original ^ proposal submitted by the applicant 4" proposed a circulation spine with a'direct connection between Wilson Avenue. and Banyan Street. The Design Review Corcr,,_ttee felt that the circu.'lation spine (Ganistel !venue) should . be modified to provide a defined break in the connLction between Wilson Avenue and Banyan: Street in order to reduce the potential j triaffic speeding and to improve the bite; distance _ visibility wt intersections. The re- alignment of the circulation Dine should be reviewed and approved by the City Engler. 2. The side -on cul -de -sacs shoull be landscaped by the applicant to provide a consistent thew• along the - circulation spine (Canistel Avenue). 3. Corner side yard fencing (decorative masonry block) should be installed by the applicant. 4. Laodscaping should be provided- to buffer the I residences from Chaffey College. The plans should be - reviewed and approved by the City p,, naer. 5. Landscaping should be installed to provide a smooth transition between tte existing Deer Creek Community to the north and the propised development. G-- 3 M QLANNING C�3P iI5?10p STAFF REPORT ' TENTATIVE TRACT' 13x42 - DEER CREE�C 3 March 26, 1967 page 4 ,l the Technical Review D. Technical Review Committee: During f 20' 1987, staff noted that the �9n�s�ttting o anuary c nnections to the ro using a number of drainage o applicant was P P In staff's eXpera-ence!, the Flood Control Deer Creek Channlry emitted the number of c „nnections - nerallY not P District has g- licant. Staff is concerned that if the' proposed 5y the. app ' ermIt the Conn have n co the Flead Control Dstrict doesthot app:iaaift, �,ay grading, as Proposed by alternated to drain tha�= streets Uack tovtards °the center of the site, the Flood Control of a letter from the connections at The City A s in receipt rovsng detailed core =iu� 1_them in the fut” as More- lfterefore� District stating that they are not app this time but may 'see attached letter). information is avairar ed and �= ,rthe cannsptlans as determinedvbY the staff recommends tha the revised Engineer, are necessary, significant changes`i'm._.tine grading P ress by the Grading City Planner. and City ermits. grading P;'.�, sha17 be reviewed and zPP Committee prior to the issuance of any P, completed the Staff has E. Environmental Assessment ro ect. If the env�ro n c ecctss as, p r found esult '4f thi issuance of avnegative e;.vMonme »tal imps Commission concurs with these findings, declara1. ould be in order if the Tentative Tract Map is approved. Council If the planning Co an ipprove C,Pneral Plan IV. FACTS FOR FIHOINGS:an Amendment 87 -02A, and app approve enera the Project al to Density Resivelo ent Code. The Amendment 86 -D an dDevelopment gistrict Amene�noPm _05 {rum Low - Medium Density Re with bloc heavth, or safety or will ct consisted , d the imen detrimental the pu In project will not t van together with the cause nuisance o i {use° and adverse � 1, ro�encomplp an a Wit addition, the proposed .. Approval, a Standards. reconmended rovsions�ef the Development Cody and City applicable p i and notices were sent to al+ property This item has been advertised in the Dail Report V, CORRESpOT� !CE: ublic hear ng. ro ect site. Newspaper as a p owners within 300 feet of the p j M" G-5 r PLANNING COWs5SUN STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 1364 - D'EER CREEK � March Zr,, 158? ' page 5 Y. RECOMMENDATION-. If the Planning Comnigxion approves General Plan., i, Amendment M to� modify the Circulation Eiement and General Plzm r.. Amendm,it 86- _and 6evelopment District Amendment 86 -05 from Low- Medium 6'ensity,- Residential to Loan Density Residential, ;�staff �. recommends 'thee, the FIann.ing Commission approved - Tent.ativq Tract Map, 13542 throdoh adopiion of the attached Resol�Uti n With- conditions. , Rey ctfui'iy �I _brad Bluer 1 City Planner i 88:SM.sgr s+ 1 Attachments: Exhibit "A'' - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Mip Exhibit "Cu - Conceptual 4 v ceding, Plan Exhibit "DW - letter from F-viod'Control D istrict Resolution of AperorAl with Conditions { I i i r I i G-5 a �M ®z Y y �l pip 7 2 CITY GF rrE%l: PLANNING DP4SItXV r � 9 LlV *1M R �p t :S s I :i v I - J2:' 8 G C' I L it 1 L t t l E -• CITY Or. T PLANNING G DIVT.S QN EXHIM D &2 ! , c.). I ql i Z*4 sir s-1y CITY Of- RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrU- PLAWINC; DpASMN EXHIBIT- SC, Li. ct)l wo 'p } f W-1 f naaMVa -7-PT 7 CITY or- RANCHO CUCAMCNGA Pi,.r1NNI1G MVISM EXHIM .-- :�..._._SG-,c,E G -1c 1 CITY OF P'LA!' NiiG D[VI G--11 rrF -%i: —2T' 1,351,12 E.YHti3iT C/ , SG%.LE -- E c crry OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA T- ANNI1G, DIVLSM •I- rMt C� w. s 4 u CITY or, MEN I= �vi�� RANQ . f� (:'UCA.'1 ONGtr► Trrf..E- PLANNI,N m'TSm �3 EXHIBIT. Sc:A G- - IN I A� L.' CITY Or, RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANLNI,Nc; DrvsK).N G-/4( TITLE- �aLIV,8t�_& EXHIBM.- IT SCALE- 13 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT -ON/ COUNTY nF SAN 6.:RNARDiNUs FLOOD CONTROL /A�RP(3 T �d�4�/ ENVIR ENrAU �­�N f r PUSUC >NORKS AGENCY, a ��,_ L5 E"t Thkd StMt • r1W pwtNMXM. CA +22415-0838 (714) 387.2800 ��y� M11HAE G. WALKER J;J March 4, 1987 P Filet i- 501 #1.00 Tract 11550 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Divisior. P.C. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ' ?F' Ririru,7 Attention; -Mr. do cfa Re; Zone 1, Dear Creak Channel Tentative Tract 13542 Gentlemea: Reference is wade to your transmittal with Tract Map No. 13542 and requesting the Districts review znd ca gents. The tentative tract is located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, 8,'etween Chaffey College and Dear Creek Channel, in the north portion of the Cit4',of Hanel- Cucamonga. In our opinion, this proposed development, is reasonably tree of serious flood hazards fron major flood channels and'arainage courses, Portions of the site may be subject to excessive street flown and accumulated drainage from the north. It is therefore recowmended that a separate rep,zrt be obtained from the City Engineer's Office with respect to local and on —site drainage conditions. our recommendations are as follows: I. A six foot block wall or other District approved barrier shall be provided along thq east side of the tentative tract. 2. It is not4id that internal drainage is to be outletted into Deer Creek through six side drains along the east boundary of the proposer( subdivision. The number of storm drain connections 311all be limited to one (1) ai. Banyon Avenue and one (1) at Wilson Avenue. 3. A permit must be obtained through the D13trictt3 Field Engineering`, Division prior to any activity on District right- of-way including!_1 the area referred to on the Tentative Tract Hap as "Excess Flood Control Lend", unless current right— of -.4vy negotiations have been consummated prior to the start of construction activity, At the time of permit .!�uiew the number, and location of the proposed side drains will be reviewed with respect to specific requirements by both the Dis„riot and the Corps of Engineers. G-1 Letter to t�e CitY tr*`Rancho Cucamonga March 4, L414 Page '2 _ 't r _ Should you have an furtber Y y � questi4r�s c �incerning this matter, Please feel free tc, contact the undersigred at, (714) 3ST -2515, Very truly yours, f � ROBERT W. CORCIJERO,'Chief -' Water Resources Division RWC:HWa:mjs cc: Ken. Willir� Flood Contrpf-� ngineering Jim Aur ; r`izld Engineering, (J 4 a 1 i •- _. 177 V RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTJDN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CgiAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TEN "FAT::VE TRACT MAP NO, 13542 WHEREAS, Tentative Trac �, Map No. 13542, Y-4reinafter "Map" submitted by the Deer Creek Compiny, ahplicant, for the purl _6 of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Raticho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 66.65 acres of land into 206 single family tots located east of Chal'Pey College between Wilson Avenue and Banyan :Street (APN 201= 191 -17 and a po, iion of 201- 191 -11) regularly came before the Planniq Commission for public hearing and action on March 25, 1987; and (( WHEREAS, the City lanner has recommended approval of w'he Map subject to all conditions set fa,th in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, `:he Planning Commission has road and conk u—&*d the Engineering and Plar;t:ng Division's reports and has consldored' other evidence presented at the pubvlic hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the PIaning Commission' of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: j SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the followiag findings in regard to rentat vie Tract 11o. 135421�nd tiie Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is 'consis`iekt with the General Plan, Developm nt Code, and specific plans;;: (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan; Development Lode, and specific plans; I (c) The site is ph;1s;ically suitable for`the type of development propoied; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substanti environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wi? -"`le or their habitat ;. (e) The tentative trac. is not likely to cause serious public health problems; _ (f) the design of the tentative tract will not c '.: with ary easement acquired by the public at large \, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE-TRACT 13542 BEER CREEK March 75%, 1987 Page 2 (9) That this project will not create advfrse impacts on the environment and a Negative t.*clatation is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 13542, a, copy of wh1cn is attached hereto, is hewsby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached c.-4a;idard Conditions: Planning Division 1. Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13542 shall be contingent upon approval of General Plan Amendment 97�02A, $eneeal Plan Amendment 86-03D, and Development District Amendne"t 66-05. 2. The side-on cul-de-sacs sh',,rTl be landscaped and irrigated to provide a cok,,�0stent theme along the circulation spine (Canistel Avenue). Plans shall be reviewed and. approved by the City Planner prior -to the �­ssuance of building pertaits. 3. Corner side yard, fencin� (deicoratti ve 'masonry block) shall be required. The location and type of materials far the wall shall be shown on the landscape p-rdn which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. A decorative masonry, block wall shal7 be required around the entire tract perimeter." The location and type of mat"Irials shall be shown on the landscape plan which snall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issk!ance of building permits. 5. Landscaping shall he provided to buffer the residences.along the west property line from Chaffey College., The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Cit,, Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 6. Landscaping along Wilson Avenue shall be installed to pro,fide a smooth transition between the proposed development and the existing Beer Creek Community to the north. 7. If substantial changes are required to the grading plan, as determined by the City Planner, City Engineer, or Building Official, the plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Grading Committee prior to the iAsuance of any permits. e lu PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13542 - DEER CREEK March 25, 1967 Page 3 Engineering OCrA sion 1. Banyan Avenue: a. The portion along the project frontage shall be dedicated and constructed as a standard half width street with fuil improvements on the north side a`;d 26 feet of pavement within a 40 foot dedication. . b. The portion irom the west tract boundary to meet the existing portion to the west shall contain a 26 foot wide pavement centerad within the ultimate right -o¢ -way however, a 401 minimum width right -of -way shall be provided initially. A permit and. easements shall be obtained from the Mettlapolitan Hater District for the portion within its right- ofzway. c. The portions. described in a and b shall be constructed with Phase III as shown ors the plans. 2. Secondary access shall be provided for all Phases as approved by the Foothill 'Fire District. 3. The portion of Master Plan :Storm Drain Line No. 3 -K shall be constructed from Deer Creek Channel to the west tract boundary. A 'debris basin shall be provided at the westerly inlet or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of the cost of construction in accordance with City Ordinance No. 75. 4 Internal storm drain facilities shall be provided as necessary based upon a final drainage study approved by the City Engineer. In particular, the need for flow interception at the intersection of - Canistel with D Street shall be addressed. Also protection frets drainage to the north of the site shall be addressed. 5. All storm drain connections to Deer Creek Channel shall be subject to the approval of tho -` Flood Control District. Any redesign of the proposed storm drain system due to district requirements shali be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 6. Right -of -way shall be provided for access ramps to Deer Creek Channel at Banyan and Wilson Avenues as recommen4nd by the Flood Control District and opPvuv,-.,j by the City Engineer. U- , �' �"=zzz r, PLANNIN.% COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13512 - DEER CREEK Marcft 25, 1987 ; Page q, 2� The -- developer shall bear all costs incurrer±-> (including con&innation proceedings) in t(4 acquisition of the off -site right -of -way required for storm drain and street construction if it is not r acquired by some otdier means prior to recordation of the Final Map. An agreement to this effect between the Developer and the City shall be executed prior to recordation of the Final Map. 8.. approval of this tentative tract map is contingent upon the City Council - approval of General Pian Amendments 86 -03D and 87 -02A and .gevelgpment District Amendment 86 -05. Builds 9 Diyisian 1. All drainage across Tots shall, be conveyed in easements and drainage devises reviewed and approved by the Building Offii.:iai, } APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY, OF MARCH, 1987 ff i a; PLANNING COMMISSION`OF i'!E CITY OF RANCHO GI;CAMONGR _BY' �E. David Barker, Chairman, ATTEST: Brad Bul I er, Deputy.: Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and 1 regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: 4BSENT: COMMISSIONERS: f r j 6 WLy�j^ GNy ku Y a a� GsM �EC°�60�. `` s ccyy OUS �d Uy 6 G `@.L A� i Q G Q S 1 L $tl { n J u r d L yQC. °� ONY i tV �. 06 e.LL 9 -y ac y QQ �d ya qw n..gGp .NY L° L $TT ' FPO Q �Y• A lyuY�N. �. M 4 Y >� CQi GW YY�p _ Np2� Y ,rya$ n�cdlit g� R ess EKq- Glo {y� w C m` a OrYG tl Y L a i 8 L s4i { i d I WLy�j^ GNy ku Y b GsM �EC°�60�. MEA UA - ^vai. Go MMy p'O K. btl L.r iy 'a C'N N yw. y;ii yC ' V GO g6 YL CZ y= upvM�T ..e � M '71 q at O (n��� \p � YC« f � `Y�`��` CYMYt�Y l u Va'G.2 Y' iA.� O. S A HY 61�SLNN NS Y� I.N.N • Z12Y1 u..b a,v vo u.a en�y. °8.�.ri +Yw�n•.$a o nL° qi' o.0 .G- NUu OY O' O,w4 ,, Yq aN$ rRLN a b-,- 111.063C- DOE ucgyY Qy �w� o d > °o$ ZOLn '� M L a r °^ °` OA V n�p1�O;Q M.q L O's 1.r. L L. L •y.QY 9 N �.. Y L:y V^ ^' q •°0 vw q +: Z rY aN� t�oAOa°a d—V.0 'o max u.L qsu° i 'rq^.r.�� ✓� >i�L a Ygi Ywbq c.°. ° !r`e Lxb wpN V � C6 SYN bgpN p N�uYYL N�'C ;. ;. CM V:O z •II'Y .Yp tl �^o as 'yQ «ey.�°'• �O gypg °as GQ Cp • U C $ S L Gpy 0.= bV Gp y$ Q N G V9C „. ^Y.N$� ~.M /N� NUYyC Sig II� �iY{S4!Y big `OBI.v,x K'4LZ UG O �y n Cr 6 V Y YL UY 21 -.2 bC Sq 1 C.b. Q� p6F W CG q. ^O�+q L}! p Y /rCy �tl�Y pq= =L � '.4Y C {L(W`a1.T dYG` Y7�. "; .�iA >Y '•�• aS �. wC ]�Ci CgC�•�C Sw e .f { Y A c 8 T C �� n: 9Oagw O° <S.tG p ■� 945-H Y�9 6aYd` pY pS YpL.Jt C04Ra$b.•. MY�iL CCGa COCA{.� aY `Y CC S. y``.9d ^YLO sGy NM Bl�tlii'li p O 4W NN Mr�.iW �! �.i a xCp CG iL q�� NOi tl N Ca V H c Z� SM Yit .i.�s�ir eC rueYN O�L6 a �M w�m@e€ tloYy.i ° v iN a°z w4�. •` Lr� 1n� Y � v.� =C I..�aw `. L `YC +15:'N� CC YY O ■q V a M s` N� ^34 O.` CCg ia� ae Ig ^Qbpa9 �$`s C�� Z. L� °9,5o�Cb uSCYCi ..y u�au q Y « CY^ _mow Ua pE� �� GYM �G uCtlNY..� tl'CC LC iW sA > sits 6 L v ny �c `�oS`} -ows b2r$'o+°. o$ IL -Z —104. iayyr� L JAS'^ y� w..rG •a6 C�L NC pGLY9 Y 8 °� b�U g+n`�v ��C 'LSG CS�+ ..O.V ; ^a v'•y.N �� O g L Yy O N° K Y+ K CQ c�. .,01 6L .. °�`bC�• 7M+ Cp S.�L ZIS «YL +Y N G fir.My� EY. yU° YM� Carw.yO .0 B Oq'N.mL.. q CC °C CdG e.O ^q'� ,J Ya> A bC G o C y�y ^bC 4�pp � qq ■y ° °��= G� Yp O O rgbN iY1�.Y� C!• a -• LYY «q"6'Cb Y> i001 �.q 'QOgYaY. 9 n U o w 6 R� L �. G < .� w 0 Y Y A V Y. O t A 9. 6 Y C� Y C Y b° ` ,- D V b O 6 tw °nrn -. oud +4 �c mL am c r tlan.+� <u g«e`a.� .o 04 O r AML c`a w� CAL coc of $u O ° O OYc :w� OCu +NULy ryay �La 't• U212: Y y° ory Y "ti1fi .,, wo a•�" =a, +�ao G °uZ v Y d O11R +p Y ` LK C Y O at. `o .� y° yON�6Vo N "• �.. y O —52—r . g ..-z �L La'a, w w i f' q o+•s, `o �R+ CNa ° q � c.N Y BYO 50 ^yYL°ca owmop N' X01 °w�.V O.a •TO =Op w i 4. a.:, bay Q.� G Z N �. N Y ''. i• 4 y Y' L w 7 O O L Q pw N L C .G. N.5 . 2Y:YN YNU � YSgcI Wa v�,. =L tvV �G r Q NYY YQV�aw.C. w.awp.o= $w�i � w�C °yuo �� c•^a �� .o L.QN.V ^�•1N �,a1 w Aid. ca. �a.,e ° �o =« ■e' YsagS oea. L4 Lo. ��jj w L.•�.. asq rL Y O �L swcG c �`��, a�g$+ -u�L.4 �n'°c S C Y To a aZ au� � F.A L GO +A IQ yyv C N L N 9pp M g Eq C Y L _ �LyG 6N' 1V Y qL. G +.CCOG C A��1+�0 dG111N NYMLr 014�a L•C.\ YO +q� y w +U p T O W ■ I C~Q� A T Q Y O V Y O tql T N 11 KYS All 1O yY_ G M 'C 4 ^Y u y C N Cyyp ^ Y q • Y Y,t ■Cy G ■ ■°V1..S■ 0Cy w6tlG `° Vp`N ..a $�CNYIVOO f$, 4iew *C1 $txj� d+ C V �N �YM Y w N -NSM G tN� SKY Yin w 6,3 n,•L• tl L ^ G g�j�Y s+ =w"° l=N�. SIN U.-= aso1$`wRe�i�R SS a !u 1: FiLna l f is Y +� ad °. i•Y.q IT H y 4rp r. O. L 11. Y4C a N qtly '•`'e 01'�. QQ q�d •A� NO. to q�. Na 4 _`� � 6� �.YO y •. Va'Cy Q1-j6 6��� � L6 < Y. r w ` Y � q ' w a �. Y I �. d � N �•i1 � < N = ; . + AGGO � 016^°L. t IL t y 0 aa.!:- 'Y� V ^ }O ^ S wS i y you yQ �G + ° u O O Va■a rYs.i f q Z4 `A p L�ya'° �.• •'r� LOC $ N Oqy �` 31. `. CEC LV' " °p4 aaru wiY o� ,i e- Y � it I/a «.M 4s. aLr,� pi -. Y s' f; CC. W wd 'Sy M 0 lit Euaai N. V Y 4 R.� tY.V a= U ••bi oG.� G. L Upu q �Y. L7a� q 4 p t'p l^ n° CY1V. rr6C �J a N„•� �q'Y,� YV 6L — Caw9 Lp� _M pL O �' GC ��tiw • VJ a�p� •^. 1` C L 4 w^ w0 O L Ryv;N Q1 Y V 7 63 01 y ��O»0"G'�E eY l; `. a,� 1� t O y oy^� .3,2:5 N.M�`LH. a 1. y g w Y y O Vc 6 .. `Y+TC Lev �72+ 44° LM C 0 .•�Y•2^ q 01 pCMw. Y mg t E a Y .�.°uw. u 6 3.� 1°YY� L � wa 4r �y� M. L6 6 <,•NO <qw. pp } <'ON l �6M _' <ti <a aBM�.i. 4ti0 <K0• C WGL�a 1°r p Ra o O �� NI. � nl fl N� {I \] AI C •I NJ 11t G---P 3 R Urd a^. .N� YaYdia Syyr p' Ei A�V CCpc 4+ L�Ly Cqv ~41 .G O.LNY .YC•� ~� p p Y P y O O V bCC'° 6Y.ti , Z L �9Y�6 M U q- C u �C .. V £YQ q ue G V C 4 Y 4° �C -.ti O'�i y` O CyQ 3VLr R LY u N Yom®9 bW« ESL N G5 V Y p H F w q1CC �OUO y. L ¢ g_ } p . i g z y V V 4' c �•i Vvy d Y G 2 p C� q C V H� C� '^ qq � r 4IIr G O pV RQ �I•.� � � �f.d Y 4.`. A Yom. O o�.y v w SLaNf °l� u. �'Uw.. q`VG6 L�yu* all Ord 5... o VrF• � ..q� nR L NR a°i +L' ' YpCC�C LTMC Si1> °ui � CO yrrN AY >� Lea LOp py BEd L�<0�. GG J p! YPLU° Y Oq NQi Pt- rb � Y �p�p� Y QL ~Y 1U^t iii ROd qV UQ 6LSy S a�LY Cr`. Y , 6 >rM J Mp` •�.r �Y.YVVj 0p6.: 4G ifY 6 CL y ?4 Y• Or Q y 0 �p - OW� 9M L N V VC. M• O 9+•S yam. U p p 2 Y OI N C D SY�_C d 0P q�L a Q� ,r t E' LOSObLp Y so(QN fO�� �R `q \: N ��r ` 'i Y Y e Y zS Y� � J i1 L O,� u� i1. tlL Lwn Lt W Y� O� *� ' ■ 3yii�r u3i4i rvt E N q.CC. -...L _ u 4YLU q yaG r 61.4 U R t>C1! �4 QO.� b uY■C L �aYis• CC CCVN 4J 9 6° L Qirt. ...q{{{ M � y9V Ot pppC Y 3_a j�4L Y RC �V p q YYN r 60000> d > p• N O Y. =QO L. y e V.. C �Htl O. M Lqq Iq G ° .� tr.�t� V Op Oyyy L Ong q L p as C\C ?G � ry�i. ��4 G r8ze 4. 1. UVI 9 Z, 9 A NNiV A L R 1� f .� Z N W 9 w •.~• C V v O1 as N M✓ r •CCO L C y u � G 7 VV � L� w tTtp Q1 �� Aft R iq 9r L�Ly C� ~� p •� OWNSS r �C R R. p w a Y i V O• V V O C T. 1:. 'O..G L Q N Yom®9 q` t� LO q 9L V Y p H F w q1CC �OUO y. ~ Lu.�uy Ow` ^iVu� L 4' c �•i n C V H� C� '^ qq � q 4IIr G i LQq��, SpJt L.r ~~ra>a {O. V° =b�_ y, CO. ► Y O'R Y eTn � VrF• � ..q� nR L NR a°i +L' ' YpCC�C LTMC Si1> °ui � CO yrrN AY >� Lea �w s,Co - 9Y�p � QL0. ON CO1 �p�p� Y QL C GR O ~OIN ` °V 'j6M • r qV UQ 6LSy g$O� g•i `8W"± a�LY O'V _Q � yyO,. srViN 6 yNy� b All 6 CL y ?4 Y• Or Q y 0 �p L. �� CG N V w y 0 M• O,h. K`.` U p p 2 Y OI N V Q L F 6yy V r L Q jp U C 6 N_N Y O J i1 L V F Qra EE.V r C•y q L p as ?G = ��4 G � ■ °D.� N� RH^, NNiV A L R 1� C .� Z N W 9 w •.~• C V v O1 as N M✓ r •CCO L C y u � G 7 VV � L� w tTtp Q1 �� L 4. O Y V C U �^ V Y w L. a+ •°+ JLii� .� S d G 4 N �. a�•�.. � q� 'J K0.0 L C d N OVN CSVN� f�J G M � � Ep (q C WLr 4 1•tiy�0..Na+V �I r �1 �►i ~I �°� �I NI �[ o �( �N( �( W � 11 MI. Nr ❑ L ,S �...... � app `. c_ �f� VU=�S e. M..Y •J y� Z. f0O0 IP.y Q � 4 M lT �. wo L S V! 4 N iti oM. u y- O Vg _v ?N� rY� °�•O ��M L, y v �� • $4 o •e-7 ate°.++ ..aoy �' �"w � 1` ♦Jf. L' L S. a uY:. C�a LV .. �.0 VC ..�-Z N b y g V ' CCII ^ aC C� Oy g�'p N1P ~ N ♦� r^ V g O b e NJpC ^�..N NY1 �g•�S tl ! +�1C� �P. _ ISM � pq N� � f 'yF � 1-Hi f of Cp � C^ �S N VQ• � � {{iYY- as �� izl S t �•• 9 Q, �. C. 4 .pY N ii ,, Q.C� �.� np. S =Y §, � UZ ".. y0 tV 1i yy...a Rp rb Six a L: ° 7 M V 'z+ Cpw O 1pp 116p�y` Y w.L. �' y _ LOY yLL CCO Yw V �. it E� y gN uy1.9.6 40 a,i 6y ON . °yoyg ilrn dL S� .g Y ; �y uS Rt 6 My C �MYIS� 9aL_A ON �p9_L4 p ®C y-y3 aO<p Ntl po� �L4N i SuP �f ppY D 7CV ZITT. i 4 G V Zwi'YY V gad " NC V �O•C= 0YYCC1�.9 dM11NC �� �Q =N J� �O Ty � ^�� 3.Ya Y�� DVL,O V•dSy +°rte. STf ■■PA C G Y. �L PO'pr_ C� Y ; q1 t? .r °NTYY cpp +cF �N 1f CC U^�� 9K L uy OJ6 A�61M wO p� 0.04 g M a.�1�N A84"�' .G ,f eO 's10: t WN9 Wid 4i ab try RR. . Y9 p L� q��ti YY OWN_■ " C GL S� oCV '.s �1, Py `ti p�G v :C aCH OLq �i y q A LL. tall V �ya0_y yQ,yp ntyY y �U ' -gCl'T G{N1 °uaY Z- y1w 7.Nyt ry '4.y j ���gyyQ. - af; ." u.Lp qs c av�p c °L e� a L4� ga aY HC� 2W LnYp Upti �t.Y 00 �q � i 41 .p.. b.V fC•�L MP Qy -OAd 6ya �L..: xa IS tln�:. bwgQL�''°c3 va .R `os..�.► n� a �g a °vim df3lgiiao a� a3v rs° °o a .+HUW snN gb i'- 1. Y Y qw v« yp $Y L o c � row =w °gyp a SI 9w G. „ NL. TIC ■y.� �� 3 xCxG u �l1 yp• 6 A V L N N 'w NVt N q. it Jt P N a p �y s sir Lg' w ii N 'q i i y 1 r` L o c � row =w °gyp G. C1 q u �l1 yg t vv 1r Y IP ��xxw *�g tlCQq y P �Y=�� 04CtC aMr �� "a4• i�• � NGLp� yViC 3 � ALL ° Y i 'ra. //�� G-a(o 11 0 U CI •n a i a �' JJ \J -P-7 e » L a. c L� •' y L j f L C Cq � ° 4 as 8 ,•, ° =— L+ L Y YY O � n q Y �� G v •' 4 ..G•yT Y C L j y Ly 3 vLa. ` �y NJ Y• wil0-zy f. Ya mac^ Y +VY iy3a MQQ AC i1D 4r �^; �° Kfi0 \LJGa V zqp� QGC� Lll zu.. p i N Y ► Z O N Y C w d ti 6v L 1r b Y ski tYJ. Q 4 y MI �YI \J -P-7 c •x C M i �M =X 4 as 8 ,•, ° =— L+ a 8 q� p S Q q Y �� G v •' 4 ..G•yT Y C L j Ly 3 �'J�1 MQQ AC i1D 4r �^; �° Kfi0 \LJGa MeL X OF —RAN i HQ ir°.3CElMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1937 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad:Buller, City,Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant. Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13316 - m MES - —total resi entia eve opment ooh$ singe fam p y lots on 84.5 acres of land in the Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 - dwelling units /acre), located at the northeast ccrner of Archibald Avenue and Carrari Avenue - APN 201 - 071 -�14, 37, a11d 45. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval -f _the subdivision design, sine plan conceptual gray , "'>szxn,- conceptual landscape plan, building elevations, and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. °rniect Density: 1.46 dwelling units %acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Nort - Single Family Residential, Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwell'.ig units /acre) South - Single Family Residential, Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) East - Proposed Single Family Residential, Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) West - Single Family Residential, Very Low Density °gsidential (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Lov Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units /acrel North - Very Low Defitity Residential (less than 2 dwelling unit5/acre) South - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) East - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwellin l g units /acre) West Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units /acre; ITEM H PLANTING COWISSIO14 STAFF REPORT - < TT 13316 - FRIEDMAN HOMES Mi�rch 25, 1987 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant wiW,a majority a t e site sloping from north to south at a 10 to 19 percent gradient. There are two gulleyt that run through the property with slopes in excess of 19 percent. The gulleys channel the natural drainage from north of the property, through the site, and out th4' southern edge of the project, II ANALYSIS: A. G4W ral• The applicar-t ir, proposing to develop: 123 single fa—mTTy—residences on lc--s ranging in size from ;70,000 square feet to 34,000 square 'eet imi area. The avejage lot size within the project <s 2, 697 square feet in arpa. The units have been designed in a Mediterranien architectural style incorporating bo.h front entry and We entry garages. Three r:olor schemes are being prep:$:_ to compliment the architectvre'.� B. Design Review :omnittee: The Design Review Committee (Barker, o savoy, a eirT76r` iginaally reviewed the proposal cn December 4, 1286*; ,At th�� time, the Committee.stated that the proposal was not xn eompl ,.,ance with the obj� ;ves of the General ]plan and Development C6de in tW` )followins- Areasc 1. The develo,nt should encourage the use of a variety of housing style5ki, 1 5p'i t level Srading. techniques, maintenance oi".sews, and arrangement and spacing to m'rnimiYe grading- and maintain the natural landform. 2. The development sho0rL relate to the natural surroundings and minim�.`e grading by following natural contours as much as possible. Split level pads, built -up f,,undations, sttppeil fnotings, can be used in areas of moderate to steep gradient. 3. The deelopment should respect the topography of the area and minimize physical and visual *;teration of the land fp- m, particularly in the foothills north of Hillside Avenue.• 4. in areas with slopes ranging from 10 to 1!) percent, development with, trading may occur, but existing land forms must retaip their natural character. Padded building, sites are permitted on slope, but split level archiTectural prototypes with stackit,f and clustering at- expected, !f a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT I'2316 - FRIEDMAN Ore- -5 March 25, 1987 Page 3 As a result of these concerns,; the nesign Review Committee did not appr,ve the proposal and stated that the plans should b_ revised to meet the objectives of the Development Code and the General Plan, On February 19, 1987, the Design Review .Committee (Emerick, Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed the revised plans. The Committee noted that the applicant had incorporated the use of sljem wall and split level construction on a majority of the trots within the project. On the uphill lots, proposed a break between the garage and the living area of approximately feet-. On tae downhill 1oU, the applicant was using a 30- incV.- high stern wall at the rear of the residence in order to minimize the a&ount of grading. The Camittee stated '', t the revisions' had general;y met the objectives of the General ran and the Development 'Code. The Committee felt, however, that several of the building pans could be reduced f!,rther tht•*:Jgh the use of "larger grade splits than tFe 30 inches currently proposed. The Committee stated that 'at the time of staff review of the final grading plans, specific lots should be identified by the Building Official and the Zity Planner that would necessitate the use of greater grade splits (i.e. higher stem walls). These changes should then to incorporated into the final grading plan prior to the issuance of any permits. This rd- quirFatent has been incorporated as Condi ',on 7 in the attached_ Resolution. C. Neig`borhood Meetings During ^` course of the review process, e applicant as ,met with idjarent home owners to receive their input. - In 3dditioft, sta +;`f conducted a neiRiLorh•iod meeting on March 11,'1987, for property owners withi,, 1010 •eet of the project. Throughout the course of these meeting,. tiro uxjor areas of concern were identified: (1) The preserv&•ion of existing views for the residents to the north and (2) The visibility of rear yards of the proposed lots from the existing homes located to the south of the project. The homeorf ers to the north of this tract are concerned about the poteaciat obstruction of their vi(-.4 down tn the valley floor and thoi r view , ",o the east towards the mountains. At presc.tt, the proposal alnng Almond Street calls for the building pads to be located 25 to 35 feet below the homes north of Almone Aiso, with the exception of Lots 31 and 36, the residencus south of .Almond are proposed as single story. The cc,rainatien of lower building pads and single story units has been acr-eptable to the property e�rness north of Almond— H-3 F PLANNING CP44ISSICR STAFF REPORT TT 13316 � FRTEDMAM,HOMES Marsh 25,,_,087 P Fage 4 r x _ k The situation at the noriawost corner of the site is sligftly different than .Almond Street. 1;hile the building pads are 21 to 37 feet below the residences to thyo north and west of the project, and late. 59 and 60 are single stsey, the homreowners are very concerned about their view being blocked by the two story units currently proposed for Lots 58, 57 and 58. The two story units are 26 and 27 feet in height. As a resulr' of the building heights 'e portion' of the vi€�•.to the valley floor and , to the Mountains-iould be oWcructed. i.:erefore, the residents would prefer the use of single story units an Lots 56, 57, an 58 isen Condition 8). I kfiile the - residents south 0 the protect along Carrara Street generally are In agreement with the tract. they are concerned about views of rear yards to .U* north. The t -tits proposed for the southwest corner of the site are located roughly 25 to 3Q feet above Carrari. As a rrsuli, the: property owners south of the development will be.,locdng into `t rear yards of Lots I through 8. To help "TvAta the contemn, the applicant has agreed to install a( not high si umpstone block wall. A portion of V-_ rear' o however, will still reshain vi =sibl e., The residents fear' .,. t some point i it time, i ndi vi duals may move into epe of,utte- kits and store old cars, .. recreational veh:cl-ss, junk, etc., that will adversely affect�_,nair view and � the value of their property. St&rf .has ioaicated that nis will 4e monitored Chroulgh code enforcement to prevent or � eliminate an undesirable situation. Staff recommends that the 1 & Res pr%ihibit the st>rage of junk, trash and debris, disabled vehicles, and that lots shall be maintsfined and kept iti o weed -frce- condition (see Condition 8). Auer issues discussed of the neighborhood include: 1. A inalority of the People in atWidance fell that I the keeping of horses was not desirable for this tract, Residents were informed that the; proposal falls within the Equestrian Overlay 6istr4ct and the keeping -nf horses Is permitted subject to the requirements of tt',e City. 2. The residents of' Alm ona Street wish to Keep Almond as rural as possible. They felt that providing ati asphalt berm in place of curb and gutter would be more appropriate. The homeowr.-rs were informed that concrete curb and gutter- is the standard used icy the City to provide miaismal maintenance and a3palr. lu XJNL t. PLANNING COMMISSIO)l STAFF "GPORT TT 13316 - FRIEDMAN HOMES March ZS, 1987 . Page 5 3. The residents of A77tond Street would like tine City to install full street improvements on the north side of Almond as a capital improve=nt project. This would require tl ty Council action through the annual budget pricess. 4. ,Aany ai. , the people in attendance would like to see the outer slopes if the debris basin land:;caped. 1is has been required in Condition 2. D. Envi, l fnz ental Assessments The applicant has completed Part 1 of e Environmental Assessmi-Int.. Staff has completed Part 2 of the Environmental' Checklist and has identified an area of potential adverse envirtimentai impact. The northern portion of the,site falls withijh the - Alquist- Priolo ` ; ial Study Zone of the Cucamongp-. Fault./ A gealogi.c;investig42 an was conducted to determine if geologic hazards were present that may affect development of the si';e. The invescigatio" revealed that no evidence of previ,as 6ultiny or subsurface rupture within the property wasr,~jesent. However., as an added pr= cautionary measure, the report 'r Ortgnended.;.a 100 foot building setback fr,%n the north propert; 'Line W, ich has been incorporated into the project design. The jeoltgic study has been revie� -ed by _ the' City's rnnsulta°it a!d has been determined to be complete and adequate. In addition, the project would require the removal of Eucalyptus trees near Lots 6, 67 and 68 (see Exhibits "C1" and "D1 ") for grading and street improvemerts The :tppl,cant will be required to replace these trees as a condition of a Tres Removal Permit. The existing Oak tree at the nortl east corner of Lot 44 will be preserved. Based upon this re.' hr, staff has determined that the proposed project does not have a significant environmental impact. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance rf a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR F,NDINGSs The project is consistent with the General Plan and Deve-Fo-p—me-H Code. The project, with the added mitipatien measures, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause instances or significant adverse environmental impacts. In ad,`ition. the proposed use and site plan, together with the re --ommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with the app" cable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as .T public hearing and notices were sent to all proper y owners within 300 feet of the pro;;ect site. In addition, a series of neighborhood meetings were conducted to receive community input. Letters fromvAdlacent Property Owners Resolut7`.on of Approval with Conditions 77 ?+ PLACNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' TT 13316 - FRIEDMAN HOMES March 25,'1987 Page 6- r V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff Tentative recommends ,vas,`; the Planning Commission approve Tract Map 13316 through adoption of the attached } + Resolution with Conditions and issue a Negative Declaration. �4 submitted, 4Respefully l h Brad Bu er City Plarne� 8B:SM:te a Attachment -. Exhibit: "A" - Site !Utilization Map Exhibit: "&' - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site` Plan- Exhibit °D" - Concept ",-�f;rt,ding Plan . Exhibit "E" - Conceptual - Landscape Pla i Exhibit "F" - 'Natural Features _ Exhibit "G" - Building Elevations db Lett(. -rs from Fr-' edman Homes _. Letters fromvAdlacent Property Owners Resolut7`.on of Approval with Conditions 0 t a a= � jfs I� +i8a •' i FI I crry or. rrF-,c: PLAMING DTVtSK) d t I EXlglB T: SCALD • _ •t.. -ter —' G ( } ` = -���i �i raerr, tit; �•� ; E' �' M � 1p ^�. I max 1 i.IN- 0 t a a= � jfs I� +i8a •' i FI I crry or. rrF-,c: PLAMING DTVtSK) d t I EXlglB T: SCALD i z r F CI'T'Y QT' r E7{HIE3iT ..— ScALE- - j 1 4. � \� Ni", A♦1..:��� rat to 4 \ { \ t`„ � � `r,,l : ;�,� ;��• ' h, \A t J j �e�tt x ,i1 °i \fit �'�. �. t � t C 1' 1 a:��� .2" wit �\ � M{ =• .� T,;,� ' p :4 i ,� � 1� t 'ice' �1•. t tc � tj fit lit ,I lo V 77 fl 17' n It r1 1, l es 3 " 'I ` -lax, 9C'5fi' /ZEt @6'V ��aBf t11 CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMaN GA Trn F'`- ANi1d \G i}WE.S i EXHIBIT. — ...So -'a; _ ink ` . �� :�� f`�� d eas '�� `` . ,�, ° ��• fir. � , ����;.�, . + �' \ w !• � •; � , 0.,r`, t \�..� iN '�li, � � `+�..x'�'�, `�� � }� �, • may, �i .5 , 1 � � �il , ��, +r t f,. RANCHO CUCAIMU',"GA Tr { tit let. \ , ink ` . �� :�� f`�� d eas '�� `` . ,�, ° ��• fir. � , ����;.�, . + �' \ w !• � •; � , 0.,r`, t \�..� iN '�li, � � `+�..x'�'�, `�� � }� �, • may, �i .5 , 1 � � �il , ��, +r t f,. RANCHO CUCAIMU',"GA Tr pE 111 ,t`'c \ _� -• � \. \ . ; \ \ \ \\ . � t �t,�ti ICA t t I�� � :� r u �•• _` 1 � � ,, " t �� �tl �i j - i , . � �; - i —; °? _i (tom, , � . '. j..>; •. ." . -, =1' �ti 1 ` `\ �� �` `'cif ``'� q_ , 1�' 111n i•{ � .� _,\`�t ` �{ i •� .V i � M e , i I f ` � �' 11 � f { r r � '�•'�,i },a'i� {if ,m �(j Y) •tr 7 v Ilf 1• I9 i • { J J' s e� � awaawr -[li /Rain 'd .0 Ih Li ���, 056tr %qf! 2NC `S2S5 t!1 � 41 CITY Or. PLANNING I}I+fISION H_11 ESCHtE3R•= /3`� SGiLE r 4 Cj Nix kkkkk k _ I '41 1 1 e` + •i t �t � �, i \ .te `� i `�' `�.`l.i 1. l_ A, a 1�''., IJI- - ! � �� ' � ' -`r!1 •� rl� ���t > � _� � ` •y + � ! i 1 , � �� �� 1. F RCIT �/ �O..��{/'�� T �/ ♦y ' �/�) r�rF- t 8 6i l.l`TVJ. IO C UC a MOIN A g 6 l 4Z'.t e! c- • /Yr./* PG I +C�_t...r' \G Di �1 l `(Ht r� Sc, LE. �i f 1� I � t � 3 {t t ►," +iy�{ Ml a ♦ J Uk a Inl®r-1. AU IT wool t` + , ,• r a,'�q.��i •Y�} a ,r 4•I• «�• ,sal. I.. �C.. CITY Qr, rrF-\ RANCHO CUCAtMOiNGA TTrLE: PLANRN',f�G P."Vl5 )N J�'% E`CHTi3iT C�.�.SCr1tE- _ C. xQF RANCHO CUC� -viC iNGA Im c i TrrLE- E%HIt rr. SCALE �d u CITY or, C CA' pa RANCH PL:` VIIING DFVISK TrrLE- FXHCBiT --�L3- \t , MY or, RANCHO CUCAMONGA WI EM TrrU.-, :5 PLANNING D 0701,-;;02 2 p `t i f 1 ,•It ' f k Ef�i i 'y � {' is - ''�•v��r.. � !! ,T t jv r jI 7b CITY OF RANCHO CU�CAIMONGA PLANNING DrVEM //-/7 E t X, ms awL F- XHIMT. 42/ SCkLE- CITY Of. RANCHO C;UOMOiNGA. PLANNING DiZrEK)N L rrE.% r• 33�. TrrLE v /Jtij/ LY. t'I' +o. MY CITY or. ITEM- R-�k"'ECHO CUCAIMOINGA, PU.NNIING MISION ipp I CITY OF T RA' C4 C; ImoNGA PLAI�iIiG WOON H- V a :2 62, E- rrE%I TCI LE EXKIMT ALE � f f ft i f 2 4 re i +�lyf h tt It t f I UM Ml � �� � art �s iit.fla CITY O RANCHO CUCA�,'V ONGA, PLANtmING Divz -aN , 2 LA U t EX HiBi' E/ SG1LE- i r7_2 CITY OF RANCHO CUQA.. ti 'Gib TITLEe tTg_rf: I �1 ! PUNNING DtVLStC,`ty ?_„SCALE- All._ . ti i �iflllil f� i r7_2 CITY OF RANCHO CUQA.. ti 'Gib TITLEe tTg_rf: I �1 ! PUNNING DtVLStC,`ty ?_„SCALE- I A a) A". :c Ova t c t / ` E 14 . i N ,` E 1 III PRI 3���y, V� iiE.( �[11�1'1i4 M ,�11! Iti� ik itCll Fi CITY OF ' -NCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE- PLANNING I?c`VL4`M �� EXH[BIT., ELE "L 1 iy i "API j. Lt Ni : R.o�n CQdI i - T (v �/ e �•� i'•� 1 cn • �. � �sa� -. It arc:. � - ,. N�� t ! I A a) A". :c Ova t c t / ` E 14 . i N ,` E 1 III PRI 3���y, V� iiE.( �[11�1'1i4 M ,�11! Iti� ik itCll Fi CITY OF ' -NCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE- PLANNING I?c`VL4`M �� EXH[BIT., ELE e r s it MILt, IT. lr a crry or- rrar�r 3 RANCHO CUCMMaNGA P IING D[VI M ����� � it i►�ii 11 R its .01.i 00 crry or- rrar�r 3 RANCHO CUCMMaNGA P IING D[VI M CITY Or, rralf ].R.�NCHO CUC4,IMONGA TrrLE PLANNING BF W)N 1-1-075 lk .,eel 4k IV CITY OF rrEm.. 0 RANCI-10 C7L:CA.VMONGA, TrrLE. PLANNING DEVISM EXHIBM ZZ 3k2l%LE-. CITY O RAIITCHQ CUCAlIIONGA, TrrLE. PLANNu\<'; Drvism ESCH[i3Ti': N y Z 1 Y co z 4c .d a d CITY OF rre�� :f33i/ RANCHO CUCA,�' ONCA, TrrLE: ���•,�,4,s �' PLANNING MVIS ON Ir t t CITY O RANCHO CUCAMI OINGA Tom: .�w-lew- PLAML ING DrVlSnN EXHIBIT -,/ �. ,9 T March if, 1 -987 ; V Hr, Scott Murphy City Planning Department 9320 gasoline Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Catifornia 91730 Gear Scotts 7 t G, As a result of the community aseting which was hold an March 17, 1987, Friedman Homes witl nccapt t h a f o I I o v i n 9 changes in E Trentative Tract 13316. These changes are necessary to m;tigate r' remaining planning department and community concerns. f' The following table highlights the required chnakes which are to be ref3actod as final plans only: LGT a L.9 !1.62 i NEW P bg t ST 3 2 56 4 1 55 3 4 54 2 3 47 1 3 28 3 4 29 4 3 108 3 4 20 1 3 16 4 3 17 3 4 90 1 4 120 2 3 80 2 3 i NEW MATRIX j i PLAN 9 GuaNTtTY PERCENTAGE �6% 1 9 2 18 15% 3 44 36% 4 _53_ _43% 123 LO0% 11155 JERSEY BLVD. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 97130 (714) 987 -01955 �"30 Mr. Scott Murphy March 18, 9987 l Page Two i ,.,.' In. accordance with our agreement, You will fiac- litatc these changes ges by the use of conditions. i:e are not required to prep-ile any amend&-!, plans to give the plan.' ins Commission. All changes wilt be addressed verbally and by condition. Thank you for your help and cooperation.. e SineereSy„ - r Martin owd forN.ard Planner MD -kf f° 7 Fcbruary 19, 1987 r Mr, Scott Murphy Planning Department 9320 Baseline Department Mancha Cucamonga, California 91730 t; c Re; Przposed condition of apprdvat. Den Scott: Friedman Homes has a committmant t•r cnoperatet and include adjacent - residents in our project p Lanni nglprocess�ing efforts. Their vested interest in the succe.%4 r our projCCt is unquestioned. As yju are already aware, Friedman Homes has made considerable efforts to include the adjacent homeowners and allay their concerns prior to any public hearing. The residents of Almond Street have been very supportive of our, project In direct response to their concerns we Slave adfusted the product mix below Almond Street as a dire--t result of their requests. In addition, the owner of the housC. behind lot 60 and 59 has requested certain assurances. In response wxg iYave, amended the site plan to sh+w single story units to preserve their view. Additictially we will provide a slump "lock wall on the north side of Lot 60 and on the north and west side of lot 59 to attvactively separate the existing homes from Tract 13316. We are offering this type of wall as a dirac, result of the request of the adjacent homeowners. The residents of Carrari Street have cooperated and met with Friedman Homes at length and throughly discussed the project. They have signed a petition in favor of our tract subject to Friedman Bones providing certain design amenities.(Seu copy attached.) In response to our neighbors' request and suggestior:C,- Friedman Homes wishes to have the following conditions added tv Tentative Tract 13316. 1. Provide a 61 stumo block wall behind tots 1 -8 ton south sicia) inclusive, and be installed prior to the `—suance of the first occupancy permit. J) 9 `1,'IA 9 713 0 .' _ - Mr. Scott Hur by p Febraa -y 19, 1987 Page Two Provide Landsceping to City standards within City right of wayl,,, on the north side of Carrari Street. 3. City required impr,-lvements to Carravi:.Street..t* be accomplished prior to the issuance of the first occupancy pirmit. k. Stump stotia black Stall to be provided on the north side of Lot;; / 60 and the north and.west side of Lot 59. S. Lot 59 an1R 60 t, aye single sto Iy Uni tn. e ' 6.. Lots 30 -37 to have units aS shown on platting -dated rebruary.19, 1987. 7. Nc'r th veri rater watt at north side of Lots 3D -37 to be ei ther 6istump stone or combinatia6; block and wrought iron with rr.a5onry pitasters desponding on desiees of „residents atbng Atmond Street. r 8. Remainder of fenc na,ptan to be submitted tcs the Planning Cepartnent for approvaL prior to the issuance of any buiLding parrits. AMA We appreciate the opportunity to work with the residents and City staff of Rancho Cucamonga to provide a quality devatopmert a? which we can alt be proud. Sincerely, Martin Dowd - - Forward Planner no:kf i 71 qwp f74,' etvate Z t �A.... � - �• �, �'S R,•1. 1 -�^. ' ` f° - i�C . {�,!'t �; ?��•1 ±:`'.i �- R't,... 1.� Fes. �t�,��`i t � ` VQJ _ � � I Jib �- ,i- f 4 January 28, 1987 Hr. Scott Murphy City of Ranchac Cucamonga J Planning department 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Scott: Please be advised of Friedman Homes, Inc comfflftmeiit to accommodate the concerns of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. As this third submittal reflects, all of the concerns garnered from the Last Design Review Meeting and the subsequent meeting with concerned staff. -have been incorporated into Amok the total development plan. The grading on each Cat has been significantly reducac. In addition, split level breaks have been incorporated into the pad design on most sit lots. Slopes which were previously .Proposed at 3:1 and 4.1 have been pulled back to 2:1 The increased land3cape requirements, decreased grading and addition of new architectural plans are di,rect . results of city direction. With respect to the Architectural, concerns which the City expressed, please not& that we have provided the desired solution. We will retain the same archi tectvilail concept vlai r`. the City has already approved, as product type 1. >Powever, we are adding a series of product type 2 which provides a split level design and deepend footings which wilt result to the garage being below the main bulk of the unit. This design will be used on the uphill situations to further reduce grading requirements and increase the aesthetic blending of the product into this foothill setting. , A third series (type 3) wilt be provided on the downhill situations. The use of deepanded footing and a raised deck with steps leading to grade has been designed. Type i units will be used only where a flat stab exists without requiring excessive grading. Typically. mnly; on the north /south streets ;could Type 1 product be used. 11155 JERSEY BLVD. RA\CHO CUCANIONGA. CALIFORNIA 4713( `` • (714: 987 -0955 Mr. Soott MurpF} r January 28, 1487 �' � j%, Page Two �l J�` C i As depicted en the plot tan, the approximzl '_n%� ix of writs are shown. As you agreed, this idenW"ioation of which unit is Type 1, Type 2, or Type 3 is not shown, `wi. tt therefore accept the condition that the exact - tc;antification oil unit type wilt be submitted for planning approval prior to the -,-ubm;ttiat of the precise grading plan. Using the parameters describt� above, the Unit Type may be determined by observing the stop* condi ti.. oar. a The plotting and orientation of the unite on each lot has been done with sevsrel criteria in mind. Aside from the marketing aspect regarding the percentage of unit types, the most important consideration was the creation, of a _ •'vitatof`'streetscape. Carafut attention to varied aetbaciLa and positioning of the garage aids of a unit at the too of adjacent slopes has bean done« of utmost concern to Friedman Home& is providing the best possible design and ,positioning of units to assure that all via-ts are ` preserved and enhanced. As you can sea by the number of sievations and profiles, a tremendous number of combinations. become evoitabt,b to create the moat exciting. -,custom" tract subdivision in the city. Careful exmminati one of the Loor plans wilt show additional step down design in some units. In summary, eight distinct eCavations arp!in0 proposed for the four fto0jjftL �I plans. Three elevations are 'provided for each product type. �I The product type and creativity necessary to create a unique project ha}%�; been grr.vided. i wit:l look forward to your continued support acid antictr'.#e no further delays on our way to a pubtic !:maring before the Plashing Commission. Sincerely, Martin Dowd ri Forward Planner MD.kf L� I i 4939.Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 March 19, 1987 } TO PiAtNING COMMISSION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM.ONGA SUBJECT: TETITATIVE TRACT 13316 We have been working with Scott Murphy, Rancho Cucamonga Asst. Planner, and Martin► Dowd, Friedman Homes, during the past months in an effort to express our concerns regarding the development of tract $3316. We are greatly concerned about the impact that the development will have on us, a0d we ask for considaraf-lon from the Planning Commission since the proposed tract interfaces with the eastern and .southern boundaries of our residence at 4939 Archibald. ' Scott Nurphy has 'reeeis -ed our three_ prior letters of correspondence and var'aus phone calls. He has been courteous and professioAlal in discussing our concerns 0. and trying to resolve tb* problems we foresee. '.irlart:i.n Dowd, Forward Planner for Friedman 4omes, has peen responsive to our requests for block retaining walls on the two boundaries of our property that interface with the tract. He has also agreed to build one -story homes on lots 56 through 60, This action is greatly appreciated by us. I am enclosing drawings of the tract which show the impact that the proposed one -story pad..elevations will have on our view. We have drawn lines projecting views from various focal points on the east side of our home. You will notice "dead spots" whr - -t.e our exist - ing view will be blocked if existing, pad elevations are not decreased. Additional grading is necessary if the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission and Friedman Homes are going to give us consideration in preserving our, existing view, The pad elevations on the following lots with one -story homes are a continuing threat to our view and of conceri!: Lot House Current Proposed Roof Requested Diff. Plan Pad Ftlev, Peak Fleur Pad Elev, in Ft 57 2 2242.0 2263.0 2239.0 w4 58 1 2250.0 2268.0 2246.0 -4 59 2 2246.5 Gar.2264.0 2242.5 -4 2248.5 Hse.2269.5 2244.5 -4 When looking at the above elevations please keep the Page 1 l ; Enc.: 6 7 Page 2 of 2 -1717 follosd'iyng in mind: 1) fur pad elevation is 2256, r ' 2) The proposed plan 1 roof peak ht. is 18 ft. 3) The proposed plan 2 garage roof peak ht. c4s 17-� ft. g 4) The proposed plan 2 house roof peak ht, is 21 ft. . ' In addition to lowering r!.e' pad elevation on lots 57, 5$ and 59 by four feet we would also ask!that you consider moving the eastern boundary of Lots 58 and 59 further to the east which would allow the homes on those lots to be moved to l f the east. Current plans show the garage placement on i Lot 59 to be only 25 feet east of our property line (15 ft E allowed for equestrian trail). h'n would also lilce to spe the pad for lot 59 moved ;north ! at least 12 feet. Vany windows in our home face the east .; and have beautiful views of the mountains and city lights, r Ile realize that the proposed development is a business venture for Friedman Homes, and we do not intend to matte s. any unreasonable demands, however, our requests are based on our obligation to protect -four own investment. When Vartin Dowd was here on Februarr-19 he commented on the fact that we do have a large investment to protect. We are attaching a copy of the real estate.lAsting which describes the ma, 'ificent view from our property. We would like to'invitP members of the Plannin8 Commission to tour our residence and property so thst a better understanding of our concerns might be realized. _Please call the phone number listed below prior to your arrival. 8incereiy, Della Christie Bert Christie Fhones 989 -5661 Enc.: 6 Thr rral estatP ListiT"n below erscrihrs thr view from '�.. our urooere7. Our vi.rla contributes a substantial sum ." of Tionry to th _appraiscI 'value of our prol.lorty, .� .� traNS -^CTts. OMC L. $ S T T N 6 S U P P L E M E N T .. Y17647 4439 ,. k410A ` r curry Ifinow j .Ot LaAa—Nee�is�r ArCMb&I4 Avenuo OH! OP A RIND -CS!9� ,kRSK VILLA- DLAMIMUL pROv. z HILLTOP SET �1l.PARORAYIIC y%Iffi..mj6 I agar . •err CONY-, .Pront veranda or IzA Spanish alsr- ooldrod file NciiTr� w Sunken living roan has tongue4grooTia artiling - .••q =R •�..:... Aris . 'LNDeF•5i 40 TO SPESL DED S wilt aansive braes k wall OS windows Formal, aining.faasi of Spanish %Iq with trench r -- _ Door+ laudl� d; to Patio t R39 ARCN2su4 refct A OT 134X178 litohen a ors 15X11 Break, ra w /7tanoh Doors, " ,_1Jt1 RaP.3+vt- .TAI'C. T,._. 112-i4C Sn~itiaT}Brick Barbaque, i Built Sae galore _ ea 5 30X95 SAtn 2 $n IT 36 tT"N DETCH EVY SEPTSC warn inviting 'separate Few.. Ra has rlr to cell aA Ma 93911 3A 2roXSS NSAT £tA1A� LESS POOL. FOON7a /5 TKrbeaLLt: HiI a0od. Pep W . arched openi r' a 13X11 L1V 01M 21X12 COOL C•A/C %IMT 1 PAL 4ARL 3. 11caST ftne A1Atr4 = ppatneling. OWID664 wst -bar 11•_4 - .Preach ea 93X12. • AH 13X21 FORK,. ROST AITCH i STUWO eCt h£TL AOOrv4 FMILY1a0w me "Ot� dcore leading: Out to 2nd %Slid patio Iosaisnse Not ^u. ca also has e1a0dlDaaaed oeilings it Wa , Na REAR sLaT 40T. fVMS 0: 1R -E w STORr 013W p1CRO tee AITA,Lom Pronch Doors.11x? walkin Bader lined closet w /b /i draaasrtvsnity,hugs cereals tllod y, ' S1_COPSR."5MA L'i18NDh MtAk - -Out Hewn Tub with 2 shower hesda -. Solid Stained Door's T /d,2ntorooa 71091erse sap. tEMITOP OF AACPI MD..MASSICAST.B, _T.SPAN7SH VULA FDR AN EXEC KnR APPAtCIATE'S HET 8AR WED COY PDDD kV PETS laundry race s / samiaa sink OUAI TT t"ATADWLE TsDAY,3lLAC KEPT PRPtATELT PAW £L to= Roar Patio tuna the length or the house -lI5'- �. a WATD.PL CALL FOR APT.DDE Ta :DOOSt I iifieaiTt .i v.-, All :; papiah filed &1—W Y �I �' Roctr ddttl0TU1 1/2 sale adjacent lot to the HorTh + ta00Pk1t OW 147 -5267 POSSESS Tae NCO aysllabli with tloai pµrohase . �l ,. �0 TARML. REALTOR Le PN ABf -1781 grow NE SAFE 'l OCC a i h r � 11 n G A O 4 t .. • ...ice. +r!. +- %54 1 r: ■ $ > fi �' 1p cal a % f � •GiaaCii'� 3.l.LT.aiT.OYS 6 N a 1 F [ II 2 A K F( I , / t* r Ils Lo (Jo LO N J _ c ❑rude.. - � I�. ( ° ado sr f m W -06, +z= X-li ova 3Ils,ziNz) cc �.�y a Q9 S ¢ •t'� iu A x Qu c ti ya cW Ao S uj Z-z Iu 0.0 w Ndo Z 7 uj .J LU i.- a- "LL la 0 � M March 18, 198; City of Rancho on h Cucamonga Planning Commission 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Sirs: As residents of Cexrari St. in Rancho Cucamonga we support the contiziued planned gr wth of our community. However, as property owners we have ser_':ous concerns about the proposed site plan of the Friedman Homes development bordering on Archibald and Carrazri Street. Our specific objection to the clamant proposal site plan is: That the Friedman .Homes bordering on the north sine of Carrari St. will lave the rear, %of their homes with underdeveloped rear yards and horse trails fazing the front of our properties. (back to front exposures) We have been in contact with the representative of Friedman Homes on numerous occasions and have worked out many of our concerns to our satisfaction. But one main concern that still remains is the enforcement;of the OCR's o^vering tract #13316. We are in receipt of a copy of the proposed Coots as submitted by Friedman Homes. Our understanding is that until the homes are completely soli, enforcement of the OCR's is required by Friedman ?comes. However, once the homes have been Bold, enforcement of the CCR's are al- mcst non existent with possib:11ity of lengthly litigations by area homeowners to correct violations. We therefore respectively request that regulations be addressed +hat would enable the code enforcement department of the City of ­.echo Cucamonga to take appropriate action when necessary to enforce these rules. This is to include rear yards facing the homes on Carrari St and main- tenance of community horse trails in the area. We request this because we have seen how CCR's in other tracts have been enforced, and knowing that future property values may be influenced by unsightly and ill maintained yards, ie. parked motor homes in rear yards, abandoned vehicles, high weeds, trash piles, satellite dishes, and horse barns that are not <o code. We make this request. Hopefully you can appreciate our concerns and take positive action to correct this negative situation. Concerned Citizens of Rancho Cucayao ;4 UL 17 4939 rchil%ald t-VerL'F` ^archo M icamonza,`r.A. arc- 2, L °47 9 Scott t 'Itivhy ' Planning nFeartmrrt RE: r000sed Tract 1331 Y ,'y hus:'arc Ord" t have reviewed the =mod Plevations that you and I discussed on February 27, and we wane \ yot, to 'crow that we greatly anpreciatP your proposal to chargP lots 56 ,1nd _ 57 to one -story h0^1P'5, ;,n a cortirvibe efkort to rrPserve of +r existinn view wP ask t'-a1 -t!-e ~011,OwLrgig considerat'iortrm- he :rac'es 1) Pad 56 the carq Plelry -^ *ion of 2233 sh,4`- 4 not be a rroblem if a ore.- stor=e hire built- there. :1Pase rr-; +est that a *+1=r 1 '^otre be o- that Lot. 2) ?a,' q7 - F.vpr wirli a one- sror•. - '- e thth nad r1pvatlor of 2?6_7 •.its �a�rF q -0*Frt7 &� rOG� Rab F�eLj' .�z 7i.Ct �WFi dhiCY ..tt� r.K SIX �nF: •r- -A,-! o lovation of 2231. 1rasF ?t71-,_­-, rrvf'.cF t`` aY tad to 223r4- refit•, s r •_ 2 home SP or t!:at , ,,o t. :ae'59 J,ilcP I:o have the -Dad r' Fvation r-c" ce,4 to 1239 per oi,r Feb. 25 1-ttFr, rowever, r_har6`;pd our minds a`:o� t revers ink tt:F -^rorosed Layo��t. '.+itH the Aaraee on the i,P ° sidP of the haxIse and t' ^e doors openi'n- :toware the east it would trovide a better sound tarrisr for us (as'you explaired). Thank you, Scott, for your courtesy and your concern regarding the impact that this project will have on us and our irvestmert, 1 Sincerely, poa C "rs. Bert Christie r a 3cort *rrnhv -archo •�rraronnn ^ronosp, Tracr 07_1` is t°P sFCone tet -rPr it w!'ich I rave rrvs� --tre `.,:r rorcprns. t-Mat Tv. arcl..I :-ave Lr, rPa r(qs to °roros -A tract 1331F,. irr *air corcrrr is obsrrtnctioN of our ei;istiro- view. ftf r rpvipwir° the rlars that, ;vott e3vp -Pf- on 70-, 21L .4e fird that tit-' nad elevations or lots 5F, 57, and 59 (, cause Preat gloctcar_p of o-iir view. Ir order for our view: to be prep,erv-'d we as?c that „vott rpqui�it the following pad Plevsrs' chargesc LOT Current Gar-',,, > Proposed roof P:=gvested oad elevation r.eak etev, nad elpvo Diff. 56 2233.0 2261.0 2227 - r+.0 57 2242.0 2270.0 2230 -12.0 5q 221�.5 2265.5 2239 - 7.5 ';her . lookiro at- these plPvatiors nipasp lcpeD three things it Tird: 1) otir nad vlevatior is 225(-; 2) the proDosee .)^F -storti roof heizht is arottt 19 fpet; 3) the -^ronosed .two- stort� roof height is as'oiit. 24 'feet. ''ver rhough onp -srory home is planned for lot 59 view ?-lockasp *ailt occur with n QarapF, nad elevation of 224�'i% U:e request that the Dad La `..Jvpd 15 feet north of the nrpse -t location (per yo-.3r sttgapstior) as well as adjustire the e,' Yage Dad elevation to 2239, rip would also li'<e to sep the r_arage on the eastern boundary of that r lot insceau of bpirg 25 ft. from our boundary lire. The would help to reducP some of the noise ould articinate from the driveway and zaragp area. The pad elevation of 2234 feet for lot 60 is not a problem if a one -story home is 1niilt there. UP do request t_nat the flaraee he situated on the sq -uherr property line of lot 60 and that it face the street.. I ax enclosing dravtdrQs of the tract which show th- imnact that the Proposed pad elevations would have on our view. •.e hay. _,:wn lines detailir, our projected 'views from various focal points on the Pest S P of our horre. As you car see there are Large "dead -octs" where our xistirQ view will Fp hlocleed if Dad elevations are rot - l - 2 - dACrPaSPd, It annears to us that additional =raelr4 is required if thr, 'rancho Cz,,camonza Planrirs tor- ission and Friedmar :or-ps are Po;np to give Is consAeorarior =rri assist i- rrrpservira 'llr P:tisti ^a view. c?c'itioral co1rcPrr.s: 1) '-hen Will locations of trees bP .9ptPrmired (sp= � rfi L -2 of clrawires)? ^:heir rlacAmpri- -^ay 'aiso have futiire iTOact on oiir view. �) ';ho 1,1111 rairtain tho Pgttpstri.an trails? Yommwnprsl assosiation be in the tract? Too "'any.• of :O,ta totna's trails are reslpcted much of the .. titre, and we i:elievP they are a real Pvpsorp. I'm erclosirg copra of oicrvrps of a few PXamples° of pxistrnf, trails. 3) Thee is a large unused space where the equPst- riar trail Past of ottr properties runs into tale northwest corner of lot 59 and dead -eras. is there a plan for this vacant corner? 'IPYrp corcerrpd about notQetial debris coliecting there. 4t ::hat t «e of walls or- fenving is proposed for each lot's properly lin(is w thinz. -the tract? 2i1l rota nirv,w „17.s he built to establish a vist:ally pleasine view to homeowners on higher elevations? The tract to the west of us has done tttis, end it's vpry attracttvp. I,- attachirs rhotos of some Tracts tokrarp m t:Pd rasp of various tvmps of walls, and fprcin3? create a vist.tatly disolf-asine "taDesrry” view, "e realize that the nronospd ctPvPiopment is a t-usirpse v0 -ture for YriPdmar ;:or_: ks, and we rio rot intend to make 1 ary 1'nrPasorablo demands, bowevpr, our rectipsts are based on our obligation to protect our own invpstmPrt. I'm attachi.re a copy of the real estate listing tJitich described the magrificPrt views Prow or!r prooerty. ' hen Martin Dowd was here or. Febrt,ary 19 he commented on the fact that we do have a larop investment to T)rvtPct. We apnrpciate Friedman Tones' of for to j provide block retaining walls on otir east and south property lines. As you know Vartir no•ad has anrPrA to talk with Us regarding our corcerrs of the im -tact that all the dirt ar.d def:ris will have on �o�s^°'pool and property maintenance during eradire are construction phasiNs. ::e articioatp plot =r comments, and we request that coi rctifv I's whPn'- .Pptirps are scheduled to take olacF. regarding tract, 1331. Sincerely, r rs. ' rt Christie T'n c x Te -' l l P' •. CR) `� (,yam`, ' � � • ti;. \ Iflflf� .�la7N T /L Ee4MT , l r \\ NA 0A. c — � •�, ����! � +rye �\ r,.. empq --7t7 n�mC4 077�!- t: j ,4 G ��CdJNFa.4 ,� -4L III jT A. rya . { RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIO0 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITI "k „4LLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. -13316. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13316 hereinafter, "Map submiitted by Friedman Homes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real pr``aerty r , situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 84.5 acres of land into 123 single family lots located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Carrari- Avenue (APN: 201 - 071 -14, 37 and 45), regularly came before the ` Planning Commission for public hearing and action on March 25, 1987; rnd WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommena'ed approval, of the Maur subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's C reports; and i WHEREAS, the Punning Ccnmission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Dilisien's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, tf;. Planning Commission of the City : of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION ,1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 13316 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the Ganeral Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is rot likely to cattse substant;al environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problEms; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.. (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on 1 the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. �1 PLANNING GOK41SStON RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13315 March 25, 1987 Page 2 SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 1)316, a copy of which is attached ereto, ii hereby approved subject to all 'of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. No structures shall be permitted within lOv'foet of the north property line of bats 44, 57, 58 and 59. i 2. The unit -A Lot 5T'shall be relocated 12 feet t- the north. 3. A six foot high slumpstone block wall shall be required along the south property Line of Lots 1 through 8. 4. A six foot high slumpstone block wall shall IJ required along the west and w: A side of Lot 59 and; .gang the north side of Lot 60. 5. Perimeter fencing shall be required along Archibald Avenue and, the south side of Almond Street. The locatj :-. and design shall be shown on the landscape plan wh.,:., shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. I "Ito 6. Carrari Street improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of any occupancy permits. 7. At the time of final grading plan review, those downhill lots with significant rear yard slopes, as determined by the Building Official and the City Planner, shall incorporate the use of greater grade splits (i.e. higher stem v,. ?s) to reduce the amount of grading to the satisfaction of the Building Official and the City Planner. 8. Lots 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 56, 57, 58, 59 and 60 shall be single story units. 9. The CC & Ws. shall require that all buildings, structures, yards and other improvements shall be maintained by each property owner in a manner wtich does not detract from the appearance of the immediate neighborhood. 10. The existing Oak tree on Lot 44 ;shall be preserved and protected as required by Municipal Code Section 19.08.110. The tree shall be enclosed by an appropriate Aft construction barrier, such as chain link fence, prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit and;'�rior to comnencement of 'work. 11-55 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13316 March 25, 1987 Page 3 11. The ;4n- Jicant shall apply for review and approval of a Tree Removal Permit prior to removal of the existing Eucalyptus. , trees in the vicinity of Lots ,65, 67, and 68. The trees shall be replaced per Municipal Code Section 19.08.100. 12. The debris basin slopes shall be 'landscaped and irrigated to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City Engineer. ENGINEERING OIVISION 1. The debris basin and the entire storm drain system shall be constructed to the satisfaction --F the City Engineer. i 2. All driveways shall be designed to prevent` vehicle contact with road surface as approved by the Building Official and City Engineer. 3. Lots 9 and '10 shall contain a flood protection wall or other overflow protectfon dcvfce to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Almond Street shall be constructed with d, minimum 26 feet pavement within a 40 foot wide dedicated right- of -way from the easterly property line to Hermosa 'Avenue. 5. Street grades greater than 12 percent shall bei,4bject to final approval of the City Engineer. 6. The vacation of "the Vk stnut 'offer of dedicati`n° shall be completed prior td Jcordation of the Final Map or as otherw'v approved by ,fie City Engineer. 7. The proposed debris basin shall be dedicated to the City in fee or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 8. Overhead Utilities: a. Archibald Avenue The existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the project side of Archibald Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the south side of Carrari Street to the first pale north of the north tract boundary prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs. first. Reimbursement of one -half the adopted cost of undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite of the street is not feasible, because the property is presently k .tel oped. PLANNING COMMISSION.RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 13316 March 25, 1387 z Page 4 b. Almond Street = An in -lieu fee as contribution to the Future of the existing overhead •`�jndergrounding utilities - �L'elecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Almond Street shall be paid to the City prior to occupancy or final inspection, � whichever occurs last. The fee shall be one ;hale the adopted unit amount times the length of the n_ rojec frontage. y APPROVED AND ADOOTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG� 9 , BY: E, David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: grad Buller, DeFuty ,.ecpe any I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City o Rancho Cucamonga, do heresy certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly an regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission Gr the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: I ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i j a se a.r ✓ /.sr�C�3. q `R��C�at MM <TY T.QA Vit~Yi �C.IO �Cw�Ci �U �wJ OV LtlN�r it wa .�oY`NVr =i ~4i !;S. �. V9IC Y knv E S�, N gg S34P.5. qe�j� °i t V7 O6Ea 4 a4 _ e qt -63 _ - t I -5 r ew +. sEr au SIC Y�4 LI'�.�rt O�44� 4a1,.Q dg4w �yi�. GM M 1yp 4� TCS.,Ytl. s�r i na Qµ��� w",�'`QNtlNrv� 3si�p 5g'a�31�� �.^.C�'ej ' �Y.�yi' AGO Qr~ic , ^r.6�"��•�a¢ �� ��D .wN y� Y VO�`04 .., O. V.l^r = "SN °Y O MCr�y9fY Nw� 0. p1p.���Y'� py�' ��K•�K.,,. `wV y.6V YMY w.1� FORA M. f[�� i M� iy .lt Q �fR Ir�A�i. \4? S a w� v U u e Y N D E W Cy.R• w yp by D an .a "yy�P. DN7 0 V . °•• w 'u' i N Q V C;1 V. $ K- ,C- ..yrrr �• 1 �` Na: 1` y` w tl N yyyey �gg4. `. s chi k C It i r •. e..: s. O Z Y v O L. a.YUw t V.ES O. Y ~�° r «� Y' c�a.9 N Y aoi 0{, Nld V � C O + s p Y�� w � o Lo w 6Yy�Y 4GAl.{ t�PQAY! -pO�My .0 CC YYVtl$•� �+- . WE ts w � % Y r'�yM YyNV ,C yp« OF '"cwgSa„ If.,0. C M ^ 4�� E a�4LN b�Qi�Rr�L •�4 w°�_y4 N 4_ SY�.Yp q p X Q iww0.M Nx Lam` �CC+�.�b �i _ ! • O..C.4 Ny Yyy 1i A%- 'ppK � `RO pL YMr. tiV i� 1 `Y yi C. W N *:;.-E !z a Y 0 iY ls ryyi�� v Ley Yw N Z^ M GE N lbtnj Ila Y L 91 S1L all V w Y 4 yNg�g Sy N u w _ Y= p y p` irIL ^ $ M p �6 q•C.0 Ly ^~ au yY o` M C Y q a g Y py r� Kti�«•N w i� 0 L 3« if ^ Mg o� > y 1c` NL i`OS y` sO.,fiC ^p4� `Y6p y= 4`Yy7l�rN+Y Yi�MML O i �.M �'y. `Yy•!y� 6y` al xasliul; w.c.^i'� •�, E�'8 i.■ v� �G al!C����{{{���V•i���Yi YyGC ���WL 1. njr q.?nv,z+$g j-fg. VYN ` L -- Y C y V 09 Y � V ^ + Y 6y a __ ,� 4 �� t u ! l N y � x. � ,b 0 ■C. t '� N�VOC +�.. AU C Zp�C My `Y6 Cw �L48wbr. � ��• "� p �yp L y. =J pd3r. D NY �Y G� # =r Y OMN VRr . C� y# 3. V �yp o Y V Y y�� 1•. �Il y. 4 C N� O y ;yam Y4Y L1p] 4 pw -H ^ vt . �w� YYpyOii. . Y i_■ P O OC ^. � Nip PE Y .l. Y 9 . L .. O : Q :. r. 7 .. O y C i N om. � O V L L w iYi Y' CQ �'• .!. Y T36Y+l t C pL Y Y Y O u n K4O4° q F•:.MC K^O' +.p NX +. KY L �V A r O•__ r�+IMp- b � A CI .: 1 Nl I -"l "�-1 "+ 'I �1 . 9~5�1 N L{ G i -N p C EUS 1. w � e Oy f, <M GG ps. w SyGyG� C +O O V t�8H1 V 1 N 11 11 �C'gcw4��:•°. . Z d C K J A ✓ C. q A q S O S L Y O H Cy b Y �L a 1 Y w. CYL �ydL GOy Yy O` --b . p i. Y� L C 4. O Ctl p« 19 Y 1 Y 4 C p4„ a Cr . C S -'Z .2 zN oSyY NcZuu L« 4 � 1y Y L L i� Y p O b c 1� Z � =jgrV ., ¢ �. �// 'p uN SL GOOC.y`YZ O'Na Gb rte; ■ CyY.i NUiM ia-34 43 o Y ~NG GOM GOMy�m �NG °p N,Y^ 3^ 4 N�. am. 'r 6, 0•�"' y�y, r3 «. �� .G.9: ^A M. -4 $.°+.. pp ppCL� y S =qL�p C$V6 a ^"Ed(r a= Yp. ENO OY WYYN NYaYM lJ2 IJ�gO�t 40- LO LQ7. L4. C „.. lw +L! 0.�4 ^•N06 q qyO C w C.Y� UYO } 1CM -Ga aza V5 S,:- - y. O Z Y y G ~ t Vt,, °cC C M « O q M N . 1 . \. Y Y O L 9 0 $ Y fr G S Y4O O ti= I OT ' 3ad w4 + L ^+�GL�. y Sit. 4q N t x y 'D YQ YMS4 tl`rl♦ pS y. +`Cp eyU1c q�{��y ' Y ys ��Yy. �LUg`� 6�lGf' New �•a N qY ^Oi OG��� 0�y��p� !^. CT �.pYO« R L NC«. iNS :xN z:•`o .-Mi <NU N$o i�g %� c.$i r'.HAI 'N^Q to GS = Sp wLxM w� a ° a 4 S!c L F.9 G 'C CC DDpp sImo. S p 1 4^ •� C Y1t'�L LYG 0 °dd s +~ -.S4 i 00 Yw qdI CVOCY Gyyi ~� '} N� L X NY YO FY «4✓ S 60H YYL qi vL,s•Y` v3r.Nx °' e ° n v $. Z. •°-zg ibt o2.0 q� L C LP «.O � ° ��. O r y N G^ S Y y 7. r^ � Lpy • A V X11 tLY� G EC Y L Lw� CG Y �10C 9�► 4 e ^N YYC^ �� Q•«i�4.. rG STM.«« 'LSD a4ige ^t fit. r' ■� tea -C3 ?c1Y� °��R YYLybO NO i�Ysp > ibN Y6N ii.1 K4 �ON�iI <46 C iN�S• 2 66wv�•�v M tk, G[ f. a-•a �n Y' t "a 2L cuEY u% A -T, Y LNYa YO Ci ad Y Y ff 1j uC4M yO.� uc � at �1°r�N N1 YYW 4i r M N Y z O C v Y �O C �a°Y� 04 • y Y 4 %w M C°^ •pY, aa• GC6CN O ^a G VQ a _ � v o —29 4 vV 3�� OiC� ■N ��6 i�.S `. a v G�•- Y9 OL�t � b. V w• Y � y u NALC. Cp Vy i11 �i4 a r L4GN d «Qs pua J'g6 V y+ aLO «S n yam R S L Ca RQ Yyy V Ra p■ L S wSYYC YRp ° 6+ $62! zlr W`g ctlu., �,"�_� pR6 NAB' OA�Lw 1l r.N•. �Y. Now • a:` Y V A aC�G�{I�Mp V NLJ •nCC6Y N�yY�O NYeLYa.. -o 2aZ ;54 t- a LL.YI � z'rY°n. iV YtL ?~ 64 OM.�n pSC VS �N ,i UN^ i 4 I a-•a �n Y' t "a 2L cuEY u% A -T, Y LNYa YO Ci ad Y Y ff 1j uC4M yO.� uc � at �1°r�N N1 YYW 4i r M N Y z O C v Y �O C �a°Y� 04 • y Y Gsc � y ey Y' N p . r� •pY, aa• GC6CN O ^a G VQ a _ � v •� V —29 4 Y 3�� OiC� ■N ��6 i�.S `. a v G�•- Y9 OL�t � b. ■ A{0. f1Y Da A N >�C NALC. Cp Vy i11 �i4 a r L4GN r. � C O �LYG t�� pp,,yy t yE O' Ca RQ Yyy V rYA p■ L S wSYYC YRp ° 6+ a 6T �,"�_� bZ =o/ u�YYt.IFi �Y. Now • a-•a �n Y' t "a 2L cuEY u% A -T, Y LNYa YO Ci ad Y Y ff 1j uC4M yO.� uc � at �1°r�N N1 YYW 4i r M N Y z O C v Y �O C r YY Gsc 2°Fa u N v L —29 4 a yy� � °i y LO Yyy "rte .. Y3$7i�¢ N L Cp ppb is St i t�� pp,,yy t yE O' G V 60. a�X ON WE V CtT is p■ L S wSYYC ,01 N aai YC �O - "t�1 r YY Gsc R a M N a L a u - Y G G NCCYly ° aVVc0. t yE O' G V 60. a�X ON WE V CtT is p■ L S wSYYC 6+ a 6T �,"�_� �Y. Now • a:` gVV`i wito -o 2aZ °.SN u =. 90 iV YtL ta..Na .V. }C�YSQ OM.�n pSC VS �N ,i UN^ N N= 6 Nty'��Y Y�L A�IIL h GC =. FY t�1�1v. Ct6 QVN "+ U W1sa {C1� WR1 @Oy�}r ■pg 6lY�Y -6i n 6 � V^ C > C N+ Iwo. L •. w 0��.. ° V ,�°a�- �^5 s• is i «p� ° V. vv•WW��S Y a n '°i �•NT w.rCL r�� fil \ °YY� Q'C usESe y �c y� G� ..y V L ♦� •Y. s N a •c° N 3 �Y'• > tu �c L NY� p iii 3a"'3. a�Yd �� �. rd. � g °ti :ji .{�V °e6•,' �.�. a��N. NL�'a•8�avgy L ava.'^ a� uY• H C N • �' � • � � of � ^ `'` �"' c� Y: �1 � V P G Gr . W L `"S • Y _ G O + it � L M. ` tl Ll ~ � O « •°i =� p � u V yLV�. �. r t Y C �q Y V y CO. ^eye Y O C a '"u+gr,- Y•!i'i Ha 9 N t Nq •^ a�.V ^ D •`•� 6•u= `yV l LLO <.Q W9 Y D �T� Y fi�� �•9 �O.••W tom, �« -� 6 G.Y. L.V vG !..OLO. 6ri i G 1,7� �yll .p •I t W J y� L^ N •Y L ` ?�C � « ^^ sL° •Y'. °� Vq�. '_tS TOO �C. arT .• n Y « LN ti ar• S tl« OL M D. 2f+ _ Nr•. =GMC •d O 4L. g O O. N O! G C M V cy a�v=i C M. yC a G�.Va Yq y� nO L.q ai V Yq C^ Q.Ve.' 4 6.s ^• � .� M C YGM�� • � 6^. O• `O �L N. LILY •O L^ 6• a a CA N.O.°'S d ^ �gp� M9 S O O Y C =�E « r O N^ C 6� G .O '� ^ CV t OA +� Z O `.r O 4� °O • uJ p •L.p b V.S{.. ° C O �, ° C r ° P C 0 N! Q L °1. ^ V O • N pp C 4OL dM A�A� p h O..Y NY G~ 01.OY • WI`S,` • N Y4NS p Ga 6 �!•R C L N S Y V G�O.+�vi ^'1. wCF D WYV �1 J�6Z 6V -6i <Qfy rp < • a Y i g SIM fa a;N•C L; y'N O. yyr R• L ac pse c' ° °�� a a .L.ogi zis M4 5Yy.xl r�<Ya CCV -L.•aa L Y< p RRf aW O.0 VY.,.. U H Cyr 6 � N P gL AO y O Sm ass c `a�aiyo L"�' `$' aY QY Loa LOw 6D ' 6`a c CZ ■ O _q�p N C p y yyYY yZ YY 6C y Maee Y Yt 6N..` YY A A ML TYw Vy vt°�� vt1 aY.r <il i- We.NLLV as a±G �(\ M.V � I I�MVW �6» •�� 9 CL cz V All °i 4y w W Q L °s s o» S 12 i� p M q6 � L H yy G■ v a\ YiM \ 4M� 4Yt�w` N6 PgOO Z,3 Ic �� w� \�\ C 1YLNP G•• JP o,m $ cy� M2 6Nr EY st, ab Ea „� a�i YLY s.. C■ �SJRin rLS� ma” o� X" Y ' " Y Yom'& NL� gg°�N. e� CON V All P 4y Q L - Y� OAtot °\ 12 i� p M oN� ' V q= wY♦ Y G■ v a\ YiM \ 4M� 4Yt�w` u� Z,3 Ic w� \�\ C 1YLNP O••r JP o,m $ cy� M2 6Nr EY st, SalY` Ea „� a�i YLY s.. C■ �SJRin rLS� ma” o� V m 0 z 1 a HCsu yu Y t •°`liiN S YOY L C' Y • YgLp �C.M rw: N ` b Ny{Y 1 d Np.. Y \C R7 Xv =,LL,X '.acs, m= c�Y ^ o n= '^o Gc� .eeY'.° L \ •� a.aa°Yr, G�» or^ i �i� eoC `r !h0 6Y Y� CQS•L ON >C C'Y- p0• A � rq OG'�N LO >� Y.0 b Qz hvTIVpL,, fw yAj <Y ^xA 1 � �. � CYJ Ly��:..�rp M''~ Yn. +V � Y°. Mkp C��L'N E `YQ ,. wC Z.G = +CCI Y� � Sr i4 �`�� y� •:` GY '�S GA C � >N � Vy Y C ■M Sr $1 `.Yi w' p.. N.r NI H7 S. p Op CD ' L�T � b � t � � M y � � 2 $6 h•+• 6Jti0 iOY• PNC C • � ^ ^I � I '� ,•� �NI L� »� jN� ��I �S �� �I 1 S 11 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � *oe�cr{�ro�,c9 STAFF REPORT � .z DATE: March 25, 1981 3977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Greg Gage, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 8648 ,(AMENDED) - 3`is MAEE"A request o waive a maxi7k eig requirement of 50 feet for an extendable radio,,�n_tenna to allow an existing antenna to be extended to 7� feet on a ,47 acre parcel in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) located at 5327 Carol Avenue - APN 1061- 111 -19. y; I. ABSTRACT: This itd,,� was appealed to the City Council al,,d referrnfi ac o he Commission to review the applicant's amend\`d requF;t for a varfance. Because the amendment is essential',ly a new application, the City Council lacked jurisdictional autl;ority to hear the appeal until the Commission had considered thr new application. Staff is �,commending denial. I II. BACKGROGMID: As a result of Code Enforcement, the applicant had originally sought approval of a variance to allow the continued use of an existing fixed radio antenna, tower, and to permit extension of the support structure from 50 to 10 feet in height. At its meeting on January 28, 1987, the Planning Commission denied the proposal on the grounds that there was insufficient justification for approval of the request. The applicant subsequently appealed. In filing the appeal, the applicant proposed to amend the initial request.byt 1. Providing a retractable design for the antenna support structure; 2. Increasing the maximum overall height (extended) t 72 feet; and 3. Keeping the antenna and support structure retracted to less than 35 feet when not in use. The Planning Commission has not previously been presented with, nor discussed, the amended request. ITE`t I _a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 86 -08 SPETRAGEL March 25, 1987 Page 2 III. ANALYSISc A. General: The Development Code establishes the maximum permitted height within the Very Low Residential District of 35 feet. The instiallation of one antenna, „, :'..:i exceeds the maximum height of the base district 13 permitted, provided "the antenna shall not exceed 50 feet in height, fully extended when in use, a-nd no higher than 35 feet when not in use (unextended) as measured from ground level ". The applicant has advised staff that the antenna has been lowered to less than 35 feet, until such time that a final r, -tsolution of the issue is achieved. The amended proposal would provide for a support structure capable of'being extended to an overall height of 72 feet, exceeding the maximum permftted height (extended) by 22 feet. When not in use, the antenna would be retracted to less than 35 feet in height. How?ver, the applicant previously testified -that the antenna is used as a repeater station 24 hours a day. The amended proposal is more consistent with the applicable portions of the Development Code, relative to retractability. Still, in order to consider approval of a variance, a hardship must be shown to apply to this property which does not apply equally to other properties in the same zone. As justification for the request, the applicant has stated: 1� Strict enforcement of the height requirement would cause a hardship with respect to antenna - reliability, 2. That amateur radio is a necessary and important emergency service,, and 3. That amateur radio serves to protect the public health, safety, and welfare in times of emergency. In reviewing the original nr000sal, the Commission found that no hardship was applicable to the subject property which was not equally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district. The facts relating to the subject property have not changed since the Planning Commission's initial review in January. The only change is the type and height of the proposed antenna. PLANNIRG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 86-08 - SPETNA &EL March 25, 1987 Page 3 B. Environmental Assessment. Staff has completed Part 2 of e Environmeatal Checklist and found' no significant impacts on the enviro0ment as a result of this project. If the, Commissior. approves the requested variance, the issuance of a Negative. Declaration is recommended. I III, FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The", Development Code requires that the annrng omm ss on mak¢__cprtain findings before a variance can be granted. Based on the following facts —`}ltaff does not find that there is sufficient justification for approval, despite thei,amended request. 1. No extraordinary conditions apply to the subject property which do not apply equally to other properties in the vicinity, f 2. The granting of the variance :would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties in the same district. - Before granting a variance, the Planning Commission shall make the following i findings: 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation woW d result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship 1 inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. 2. That there are exceptional oir extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the " property involved, or to the intended use of the property that' - do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. 4. The granting of tyre variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent pith the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. PLANNING GOMMIS$1,0N STAFF- REPORT ' VARFANCE 8`6 -08- - SPETItAGEL March 25, 198 l Page 4 J = 5. That the granting 6r the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements In the vicinity. , IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing 'item in t ..ai'!y Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices seni.I' o a , property owners within feet of the subject _300 property. _ V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends tha;r, the Planning Commission deny e amended request, unless ttie CooRission can support, positive facts for findings necessary for approval. a, ►lly s itted ARee er nner , 4 BB:GG :te 4 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit °B" - Letter '°rom Resident at 5338 Peridot Exhibit "C" - Letter from Resident at 5356Yferidot Exhibit "D" - Letter from- !:esident at 5325 Peridot Resolution No, 87 -17 Denying Variance No. 86 -08 - Minutes of January 28, 1987 Plannng Commission Meeting City Council Staff Report of March 4, 1987 Resclution of Denial , mi r e i Y Liu CITY ter. rTGeI= MARIANQ11 §§ =Qa RAi•CHO CUCAtiIO. GA TITLE- ESIPILEX MAP NO RTE, C;Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A��NIhO DiY:S,ON Ali JAN 2, F�f I Exhv'bit 'B January 22, 1997 Greg Gage (( r " Planning Comsiaiion se: Variance 88 -08 " Rancho Cucatin e1 S etna / P 6 9320 Use LinQ Road, Unit ?4 AP t iObT- ii.1 -15) Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. {{ 1701 1l 5327 Carol Ave. Sirz wF. r . This letter is in reepanae in your letter and *10 our tel +"zbora# call to your roffice. r f V Since rich- 3 to pe heel put up his radr3o antenna lam% sumoter, our radio has so touch attotic at various times that we cannot listen.,. He wort* a neighbors saying that the' interference would not affect our radio or teiat i0tion. Well, it doosl Also? it does not do aq� justice to our beautiful viawr of the mount- aina. We object stroag4 to this antennal and' Xar„� n Erjrly 5311 Perid :" `�venua Alta Luna, CnC. P1701 c (71,4) :489 -24944 C;Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A��NIhO DiY:S,ON Ali JAN 2, F�f I Exhv'bit 'B 5 J-InuarY 23, 1987 C. Pryor 5350 P7-or Ave. Alta Lama, CA. 91?01 ,Dees Mr''Aa$e: Myself and others in V nei6borhood have noticed}an increased aw=t of iuterferei to in our television and stereo "Ct jtian for coos tinw."' now. I feel that the added extension of tht-aatenne on Carol Would bo a7grean nuisante it the City P*A4 d this ruling. Our ree,n)tion is hozTIV',* now. Pleas* consider reJecting `this, as M, right now it is a terribi.i�.`eye9 ware for all of us. i Sinc�e}rely4 -- RECSIVLD —� CiTY OF PAP. S0 Ct—^Mv;ONOA Art P6; Exhibit MV t. t i�•- �- � -'�-�- _ 7 � �Q�' asp....- �. .a� �57e � 4 I �c..uu•4k� �L�qr � r�U �f F r 7,;te- S3.2,5- Exhlbdt °D" . 2 ,CITY OF RANG -40 CUC_a1Vi4N�' i, MEMORANDUM DATE: March 4, 1567 ;, TO: Ma,-or and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Greg,Gage, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIR0PM�4ENTA1. ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 86 -03 - SPETNAGEL - A re ""as wa qu ve a MCF, mum e g requ -remen 0 6 feet,for a s)xed radio antenna to allow an existing ante�•1a to he extended to 72 feet on a..47 -acre parcel in the Very low Rest&ntial District (Tess (:ran 2 dwelling units 'per acre) located at 5327 Carol Avi.x0ue - APR 1061- '111 -19. T. RECOMMENDATION: Direst that the we - -,plication be processed for P ann ng omm }ssion review and consit�zi,tion. II. BACKGROUND: As a result of Code Enforcement, the applicant had or g na y sougijt approval of a Variance to allow the continued use of an existing Fixed radio antenna tower, and to permit extension of the pport i tructure from 50 to 70 feet in hei0t. At its meeting on Januia y 2% ,1567, the P"' ning Commission denied the proposal on the grounds tr_?t there v=ia( ir;ufficient justification for approval of t`re request (sae attached Staff Report, Part TV). Tha applicant is appealing the d cisior, of the Commission on the basis that all pertinent data wrs, mot considered: Further, the applicant proposes to amend the fhl.,val proposal by: 1. Providing a retractable design f:�r,the antenna support structure; 2. Increasing the maximum ova 411 height (extended) to 72 feet; and 3. Keeping the antenna and support strueW -e retracted to less than 35 feet when not in use. The Plannin Commission was not presented with, nor discussed, r s a w. -n ems' rd equest. Ili J ,.. i� CITY CCUN6 -kj 571''FF R pL�T i_ F Variance 86 -08 - 3petna (t7. r liarwh s 1987 _ Page 2 M. ANALYSIS: Based on State lak requirements, the bevelopment.C,ode Na-F-5—en, fs,)rmelated to r,-re planning Con -nissign raview of Variance 4',,,Acations. Boccause the applic4nt, has amended his Variance request to,, \one not, reviewO by Zbe Planning Commission, ` the Ci+y Council Iic" aurjsdjctior prarequisites to act An the t request as amended.'. xesp 0 _ Bra - _ Brad B14 per � f City P annex ; BB :GG :ns iII Attachments: Letter of Appeal from Applicant i - 'Exhibit "A " --� Vicinity Map Exhibit "B�'- Letter ft am Residents at 5338 Peridoi Exhibit xC" - Let"zer frgm Resident at 5350 Perid(,'*- Ex'hibit "D" - Letter from Resident at 5325 Perfdot Planning Commisstgn Statt Report, Janue: #y 28, 1987 f Planning Commiss;on Resolution of Denial" l i - i I �e7 ,c .c FeMuoY g Z,19? c. Pill Beverles4. "Authelet �'���4�II�12a1�►,.3t4,$ +t.;. City Clark City of, Rineho Cucomonge -� P. 0. Box 801 Rancho Cucamonga, California 9 136 Dear Mae Authelat: I' The Planting Comul- lop denied Envir';Iaantal Assessment and Variance ;af -0$ wir• out coasi4ering ie�tinant data proednted to f tbeae ?!n subatarieiated docuceents and- by aral testitoasy, e Also the Pedaral Causunieation Commission's limitad nre- anptio* dt'ear PRB —1 was got 'conaiderad by; Khu pXanning ? Com�:seion. : Therefore, "x f * "eal the de,aial o Chr - -: Rancho Cuca�iankia City Cq 'neil. In ea effort to maintain no ghboThood harivon„ and tranqui lip;, and beacanas I .belier�s the C{ ; ty of Ran eho Cucamonga and I, can reach an, agraeaaemt vlaich witi i aerve -eke city's legitimate i purpose -snd will accomp;;*, "ag legitimG')te ecmmunicaC3ans needs, I an amending ny origf applScation cf November 13, 1986 to proviuo for the foll�� ,u i 1 That tha �xutenL yc'pport structure shall -No of retractable design and will not require .,'xF wires. ,.'fat the antenna support structu_e is capable of of being fully ext6nde..4 to a height of 72 feet. That the antenna aupgort structure will 3e kept ra *racted (unextazdsd) when not it use." "fin "t Zhu term "3ntannaa support structure" is defined to mean the tower and dcea not Include to antenna asst or aLt4a—Uts used to redfato radio'•frequnnC7`nnergy. That, when retracted, the antenna su ppoxt structure, including mast and antennas will not ezce*d. 35 fait' as nessured from: ground 1ovcl 7 „ T►�t the antenna support struture is vo be a Tr. -Ex r Lower Corp.Model IM -470 a Q.S. Tower 1:4rp. Model T% -472 ;''. r HDX -572 or I tower of 'simi4r design. � Should: You resquir� - dditionil inf� ?laatiq��t {, Please IeeT .frea to cant+sGC qe. Sincerely„ Charles F. Spa aagol k 5327 Carol Ave. Alta Lola, CA 4im (714) 945 -9305 i 1 CIF CSI' RAI CHO CUCAMONGA PLAt'�JNINL O €3tVt KYN -T-A( rM-NI: VADIA CL AA -Cif TtTi.E- aHM i V 11 NORTH r P` January 22, 1981 Greg Gage Planning Commissicc, ! Re: Variance 80-08 Rancho Cucamonga Spetnagel 9320 Base Line Road, Unit R APS 1001- 111 -19 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91 �1 5527 Carm1 Ave. Sire This latter is in reapoie to your letter and to our tslophona call tm your office. �\ Since lyre 9petnagal put up his rafto'ante9na last num:sr, our radio has so such static et various times that we cannot listen. He v►orte neighbors saying that the interference would not affect over radio or television. Well, it does! Alsor it does, not do any * *tice to our beautiful view of the uaes�t- ains. W* object strongly to this'antennat _. r "n and Marion Early 5338 Peridot A.vajue Alta Lo0a, Ca' 1. 701 OU) 989 -2499 -- �Et`IiVED --- CnY OF RANI -10 WCAMONGA KANN= DIVZON AID JAN :3 _ r. f S { 1 1 ' ff E'!'/t� h t �/' I t .8b M, ll January „23. ?987 C. Pryo.>il i i 5350 Per4o t Ave. Alta Loma, CA., 91%m Dear Hr.. Gag&: MYself and others in my neighbmrhoo,1 have aotioed an increased amount of interference in our televi8�,on and ateroo reception for some time noii. `i I feel that the added extension the saatOMM on Carol would be a great nuiannee if the City Pagabad this rr.'UR. Our reception is horrible raw. = Pleane consider rejecting this* as or,riO" sq" it is a ter:;ible eye- sore for all of us. Sincerely, - r C o qW i. I 1� R ECEiVE`� CITY OF RAW*G C " A.VIONGA PLANNING W-1:4-1 ON hh Phi �9 [Exhibit 'C' ;I Y .u..� �l ✓li.�Lt.fp Ax z�-i J.. i -77-61 1 T, %_2, 4 �,`_ � 1 �._. �f.�s l 1� °�� 7 �L C � ♦ � � wi•Y rti Ate. .� 1 .a f j Exhibit ;� lu CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' e��CAM, STAFF REPORT F Z January 28, 1987;1 j'> DATE: TO: Chairman and Members of the Pianni.,g;Commission FROM: Brad 8.41l er, City Planner BY: 1ireg Gage, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: [ "NYTRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 86 -08 - 'SP €TNAGEL - A request to waive tne mx mum e g requ remea X35 feet for a fixed radio antenna to allow an existing antenna 50 feet in height to be extended to 70 feet on a 47 acre parcel in the Very Law Residential District: (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) located at 5327 Carty Avenue - APN i�J6'- 111 -19. I. ABSTRACT: �s a result of code enforcement, the applicant is see ng approval of a Variance to allow the continued use of a fixed radio antenna tower. Although a building permit is required fcr the antenna footing-,y a permit was not obtained prior to runstruction. The appli; ant ha. "so requested approval to extend the existing radio antenna frow 50 feet to 70 feet in height. Staff is recommending that the Variance request be denied on the basis that the required Facts for Finding necissary for approval cannot be met. II, ANALYSIS• A. General: The Ueveloparent Code establishes the maximum permitte d height within the Very Low Residential District as 35 feet. The installation of one 7, -tenna which exceeds the maximum height of the base district is permitted, provided "the antenna shall not exceed 50 feet in height, fully extended when In use, and no higher than 35 feet when not in use (unextended) as measured from ground level". The existing antenna is approximately 50 feet in height, and is not retractable to a lesser height and is therefore in viotation in its present condition. The applicant also proposes to increase the discrepancy by an additional 20 feet by extending the antenna Ind support structure to an overall height of 70 feet„ As Justification for the proposal, the applicant has stated: (1) That strict enforcement of the height requiremRnt: would cause hardship with ' respect to anterona { reliability; I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Variance 86-08 - Spatnagel January 78, 1987 Page 2 (2) Tnat a.,,ateur radio is a necessary and important emergency service; and (3) That amateur radio serves to protect the public health, safety, and welfare in times of emergency. In order to consider approval of a Variance, a hardship must -be shown to apply 'to this property which does not apply generally,.n ' other properties in the same zone. In considering the request, no hardship has been identified which is applicable to the s,.bject property which is not generally applicable to other properties in the Very Low Residential District. Also, the hardship was self- impesed in that the antenna structure was erected without the City's review or approval in excess of the 35 foot height limit when not in 'use. In a Memorandum Opinion and order adopted September 16, 1985, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) discussed the preemption of state and local regulations pertaining to amateur radio facilities. In its disrussion, the FCC recognized the importance of the amrateur v, dio service for the provision of emergency c, T mNJnica$;ork5: We will not, however, specify any particular height limitation below which a local government may not regulate, nor will we suggest the precise language that must be contained in local ordinances, such as mechanisms for special exceptions, variances, or conditional use permits. Nevertheless, local eeu*t� ;% ations which involve placement, screening, or height 1)f antennas based on health, safety, or aesthetic considerations must be crafted to accomnedate reasonably amateur comhunications, and to represent the 'minimum practicable regulation to accomplish the local authority's legitimate purpose. The City Attorney has reviewed the FCC ruling and determined that it does not preempt the City's antenna regulations (see attached). Ir accordance with the FCC order, the Development Code doesn't preclude amateur communications; neither does it discriminate between amateur radio, televftion or satellite antennas. The Code provides for reasonable a+at, ue communications, while still representing a rp nimma of rog 44atlfon in accomplishing the aesthetic goals and objectives of the City. Therefore, in the absence of a hardship applicable to the ,property, and in light of the existing operational status of the radio facilities, an extension of the tower and associated support structure is not warranted. Further, in that the safety and structural integrity of such facilities are legitimate concerns of the City's regulatory process, the soundness Lm 11 PLANNING OWSS --1O f SIAPF- ,REPdkr la" H ance woe - spetnagel C January 28, 1987 Page 3 and adequacy of the existing antenna footings ^hould be investigated, B. Environmental Assessarrlt Ii Staff has completed Part 11 of the nviF —iro ,� a� �Cne -! T and found no significant impacts on the, enviro�ic a reslelt of this project, If the Commission J, approves th, requastojd "Variance, the issuance of a Negative Declaration is recotaminded. III. ALTERNATIVE: As n -A ternative Walton to approving the requested ; ar a4nce, a redesign of the existing antenna configuration shoul be considered. , By providin a fixed su r g ppo�ti ;�ucture wtit,� af extendable antenna, reasonably effective eo unicitions could �e �tichieved,, while cs�lying with the applicable p6 ions of tAe Development. Code., IV. FACTS FOR F*NDIWIS The Develoyment Code. ,requires that the ann ng' omm si"sio� ' make certain Findings before &.Variance can.,be granted. Based on the following facts, staff bel ieves that to re is insufficient Justification to make the recessallf fin�si,1gs of approval. 1. The existing antenna height of 50 feet does tiot`':onform to the 35 foot, height limit when-not in use, Fu'ther, the applicant's request to extend the height to 70 feet would increase this ,discrepancy. 2. The nor.conformity was self - imposed and not due to the extraordinary conditions applicable to the property, suc( as topography. S. That the granting of the Variance would Constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the 'lim tatibas placed upon other properties in the sarie district., 4. T "at approval of the Variance does nec resolve the potential safety hazard created as a result of an unirnspected footing. Befor, granting a Variance, the Pla,ming CoMlission shall make the fol i .ark' ng fi -.dl, ags; 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the, specified regulation workld result in practical difficulty or urneceissary physical 'hardship inconsistent with the objectives'br the Development Code. Fy. PLANIdTT* C- MUSSION ✓STAFF REPORT Variance 86 -08 Speti"_el Jan�-ary 28, 487 Page 4 2. 'That there are exceptional or extraordinary cfecumstances or canditi�ns ,-applicable to the property in�rolved, or to tale intended use of they, property that- do not apply generally to: other p.ropertigs inn the same district. 3, That strict or literal interpretation and enfercement of the specified regulation tmuld deprive the 6ppi cant of privileges en4.oyNO by the owners of other properties -in th±� s0e district. 4. That the graking of the Variance will net constit ` 'a grant of special priviege inconsistent with the limitations on other' properties classified in the same district. S. Tiat the granting of 'the Variance will not tie detrimental to the public health,.�iafety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the ykinity. �1 V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as //a Public Nearing Tfim 3n Me-- Daily�R_e o�rt newspaper; the property posted, and notices were sent. w atl property owners ,within 300 feet of the subject property. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny e Variance—request and direct the applicant to pursue an alternative solution. R fitful ubmittel, rad B + City Planner BB:GG :ns Attachments: Letters front Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Memorandum Opinion and Order of the Federal Cornninications Commission, hated September 16, 1485 Exhibit "60 - City Attorney Opinion Resolution of Denial November 13, 1986 .` Ilk I am a radaa ems aur, lictaced by the Federal Communications Commission to operate in the medium irusd high frequency,bands from 160 to 1 Smeteca. The amateur radio servica has, from ir.0a inception in the ear1i�19oo's :_ been involved with publsc service, technical expzrimsatation and iiaterw -' national good-vi-,- `fo, ncc. piiah these, an effective ann - fficient j antenna syetes euedtial. Fundaaevntal =tena t design zegwOes, that., for an ante_�.�ra to radsrlu�m efficently, it au t be A�ed a minimum wf 't one - fourth wavy angth above ground-. At the pt'eawRt time, the lowest, frequency b. .d that I operate it the go m4'jar hand._,- (3.5- 4.0, -*z). forth e- wavel�agth at this- f>raquency is 69.e�eet. Ilaxiaum aateunta effieiency is of prine importana._. o tae ber„ag" of Cha aahysical location of my pr4.Arty„ The mountains are epprozitae'�' half mile to the north. To achieve useable, consistOAt and reiti,sb o communications, antenna must have a free. unobstructed and low angle' of raditirn. An of these critera are met by raiutaining antenna height at one - fourth wavelength above, ground. To sumarize, an antenna pcw4orms most efficiently when i ya planed a +A minima of one- fourth r ve3angth above ground An�effici tl�nteatna systes is es.iential t*. provide conai -Wtant and reliable c at tials, especially to the north due to tlhe'topographirai barrier o the mountains. c� , There €ore, 1 ask to have a variances $raatea to s tion 37, /W8.O60 of tIiu Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code #,'d be alloyed tt-. erect �� sntenna support structure 70 feet in height. This antenna support,structure will be constructed using good engineer- ing practices and prinipsis and wiJI pose no health, safety or welfare consideration. Charles F Sgctnagal 5327'Caroi Ave Alga Loma, a%Uf. 9,1?Ol cc: Gorge J. Rohrer, Attorney at Law D. Craig Toz, Deputy City Attorney l s z. 77 Greg G��e%' December 23,_1 Assist*;I Planner Planning E ',vision City of Rancho Cucamonga SULIECT: VARTANC£186 -08 n Dear Mr. Gage: - The following information is provided as an addendum to my variance f V nPlication dated Novae,,Abee 13,.11 1486. The Federal Commnnicaelons Commission recognizes amateur radio's f4; necessity avid importance, to ewergeuc:y` communicatier%s in that it �. is specific*Ily stated as a fundam4axtal, purpose of the service. Recognitioa and enhaacagent of the value of the amateur service to the public as a vcl- untary t1oncommercisl comg4nication service, particularly with respec� to providing emergency coamunication (1) WGrld governments recognize tit: ability�if the amateur servic_ t provide disaster communications on. a worjid -wide basis. That international disaster communications f, would be facilitated by temporary uca of certain frenuettry bands p1loi�,ated to the amateur ser-,i -, That under `thl, 4 circuastanc�r�. ' the stations s, of the amateur ,�.srvice becauser +` of their widespread distribution and their demonstrated capacity in such cafes. "can ssist in meeting essential communication needs. (2) Local and regional amateur radio clubs are continually involved in providing public service ar`u emergency communications as evidenrad by the Cerritos recent air disaster, the Mexic. City earthq Vice, the Hands Across America anti the 4rape Festival. Since 3ne of my areas tf concern is to maintain a station available to respond in times of emergency, a; hardship will be created wi.hout effective antennas. The moaatai:zs t; the north create a radii barricade. A consistant, reliable and, _fficient eaterna sasbm is essential II a 0701 -02 0 3 -25 -87 PC Agenda 4 Public service, public safety and emergency radio is excluded from height restrictions. (3) Iwo The purpose and intent of the Development Code is (in part) to promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare. (4) The Federal Communications Commission believed that, be «,.ause of restrictive - egulations ?ertaining to amateur radio facilities, a limited preemption pol-cy was warranted. (5) Local regulations which involve placement, screening, or height of antennas based on health, safety, or aesthetic considerations must be crafted to accommo- date teaeonably amateur communications, and t re- present the minimum practicable regulation to accomplish the local authority's legitimate purpose. Therefore; This variance should be granted as it has beer shown that amateur radio is a service that has demonstrated it's necessity and importance in ;:Imes of emergency. This variance should be granted in that doing so is in agreement with the purpose and intent of the Development Code as amateur radio is continually engaged in public service anal, in times of emergency, is regularly engaged in communications for the purpose of protecting the public health, safety and welfare. This varian A should be granted in that strict enforcement v;sld cause hardship with respect to antenna r ;-liability. The full text of the c, ;k:d , <acuments are enclosed for your con - vience. If you requires =iddittonal information please contact me. i Sincerely, I Charles P. Spetnagel 5327 Carol Ave. Rastzho Cucamonga, CA 91701 enclosures (1) CFR Title 47 Chapter 1 Part 97.1a (2) CFR Title 47 Chapter I Part 97 Appendix 6 Resolution j40 (3) Development Code, City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.0$.060 I(1) (4) Development Code, City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.02.010 C (5) FCC - Memorandum Opinion and Ordfr -- PRB -1 cc; George J. Rohrer, Attorney at Law Ralph D. Hanson, Deputy City Attorney 5! i4 + i iiaa�e AQi SYAL"i /w Secs. 20 A 21 Back lost PCs 11 T.1 N. , R.T W. 50R Berw4m - ODWity �11 V �O H ` ����++ IN R CITY Or rrM- 11 F. 21 -20 RANCHO CUCA rION, , ion y,i3 5!,39 HS7 173 frit7 tao>e vaas s237 east �ayl I 7T957 r. r 72 n 11 M 10 3f. 9 {jq ®. e7/ 7 4 /w Secs. 20 A 21 Back lost PCs 11 T.1 N. , R.T W. 50R Berw4m - ODWity �11 V �O H ` ����++ IN R CITY Or rrM- 11 F. 21 -20 RANCHO CUCA rION, , El lu l Ex f MA7 it tioJSC rat MY fat Fto�a[ad -Cw4r Radio Asetoss Tamar. DiYm: 3pstsa$sl. Cthgrli.• d vandrm AMISS. 3327 Carol Ave. Ales toms, ZA 91701 pmM 714.945 -9309 I„ *,r ,,e t�Rot'aSSti i�/RAtE1� E %rSYi,JG b a tO1t CH crry or, iTC..Nlt M IA„N.E$"- a RANCHO CUCA- ,VIO,*,\GA Ah r PLANNING DIVISION E�HltilT �. SGTLC= ��� r a� t Before the Federal Communications Commission aj W&-s tington,, O.G. 2054 In the Mattor of ) Federal prai�ptlon of state and Z PR3-I local regulations pertaining ) to Avateur radio facilities, ) ANA1�1 r�F+i�rAN ANj) Adoptellt September 16, 1985 T R*IoasidtSeptsmber 19, 1985 By the C/,) mIs$forICommissioner Aiirera not participating I. On July 16, 1984, the Aver lean Red to Relay League, Inc. UR,Ri) f i led a Request for I ssuance of a ©ea laretory Ru I Ing st, Ing us *.,-t dpiinoete the limitatiOns of I caI zoning and other 10s81 and stato reguwory authority over Foderally- licensed radio facilities. 8; ,lfkailq, the ARRL wanted an explicit statemOnt that would pres"t all Hxal ordinances which prokp,biy preclude or significantly Inhibit effective, reliable amatear ra f come .n lent tons. The ARRL acknow iii Ces that 1"81 author tt los can rogu lat amateur instslisticrrrs to insure tW;bafoty and health of persons In the ccmnunity,, but aelioves that those p®gulations cannot be so restrictive that they preclude effective amataur� C:oo mun(cations. t 2. Interested parties were ad'Ased that they col id file com ants. In the matter I. Wit-1t extension, cogmats were due on or before Oecembir 26, 104 20 with reply comments due on or before January 23, 1985 '. Over sixteen hundred ccanortts were filed. I Public Notice, August 30, 1964, Romeo. No. 6299, 49 F.R. 36113, September 14, 1984. 2 ? "o I It P'otice, December 19, 1934, Mime* No. 1498. 3 Order, November 8, 1984, Bums®. No. 770. 2 3. Conflicts between snateur operators regarding radio antennas and local authorities regard ing`restrlctIva ordinances are common. The amateur'' operator Is governed by the regulations contained in Part 07 of our rules. those 'rules 'do not limit the height of an Amateur antenna but they require, for aviation safety reasons.. that certain FAA notification and FCC approval procedures must be followed ,for antennas which exceed 200: 4tat In height, above ground level or antennas which are to be erected near airports. Thus, under FCC rules some amateur antenna support structures requlrr, obstruction marking and lighting. On that other hand, local municipalltles or governing bodies frequonfly,'enact regulations limlt{ng antennas and their support structures In height and locaticm, e.g. to Tilde or rear yards; for health, safety or aesthat -. constderaations:. These ilm.itlng'rtagulatlens can result In conflict because th& offectiveness.;:�# the communications that emanate from an amateur radio statipa are dtreGtly depahoent upon tho locution and the height of the antenna. Ame4ur operators maintain that they are precluded from oporating in certain bands allocated for their use it the height of their antennas is limited by a local ordinance. 4. Examples of restrictive local ordinances were subml, ?tea by several ` amateur operators, In this proceeding. Stanley J. Cichy, San Clogo. California, noted teat V. San Diego amateur radio antenner, come, under a structures ruling r Moir "limits building heights to '30 feet. Thus, antennas there are also !Imli6d to 30 feet. Alexander Vrerlos, Mundelein, Illinois wrote that an ordinance of the Vilia£e of-Mundelein ' provides that an antenna must be a distance from the property i'<a„ #,tnat is .equal to one and one -half times Its height. in his case, he is 1)44 ed to an antenna tower for his amateur station ,lust over 53 feet in height, 5. John C. Chapman, an amateur living in Slaomington, Minnesota, coeimw ed that he +,as not able to obtain a building permit to install an amateur radio antenna exceeding 35 feet In height because the Bloomington city ordinance restricted 11structuresei heights -o 35 fret. Mr. Chapman said that the; orrinance, when. written, undoubtedly applied `•,o buildings but was now being applied to antennas in the absence of a spcq;iilc ordinance regulating them. Taern were two options open to him if he wanted to engage In amateur communications. He could request a variance to the ordinance by ray of a hearing before the City Council, or he could obtain affidavits from his neighbors auearing That they had no objectton to the crcoosed antenna Installation. He ,ot the building permit after otltaining t ^e cooperation of his neighbors. His concern, howL-ver, is that no had to geT permission from several people before he could effectively engage in radio communications for which he had a valid FCC amateur license. - 6. In additizn- to height restr•fctions, other limits are enacted - toest:jurtsdlcttons-- en4t�alimb doyleys on to or fences around q them; minimu,h dtitanc+s from high voltage Power Ines, minimum dtstane of towers from property 11PO .t_ and roaulations pertaining to the structural� 'a snur,4.;as3'of the antenna Ihsfia`! tat Ion. Sy and large. amateurs do not find �r sa t t b Hess #e, t y precau onst o Jecti:sIRIC 10. = ;Anal they do ob,f act to art. the sometimes prohibitive, non- etfundablo aPPitatton tiling foes to obtain i permit to erect an Wntenne installation and those provislgns In ordlnanci�s whim regulate antennas for purely aesthe-1c raasans, rho amateurs catond,; almost universally, that "besuty Is In'th* eye of rho beholder," They assert'. that an antenna installation is not more aesthetically dtsplee�_!ng than other objects that seaple keep jaw their property, e.g, motor homes, traitors, plck-up trucks, .:., Collector$ and gardening equipment. 7. Amateur operators also oppose restrictions on 'their amateur operations which are contained --"n the deeds for their homes or in their apartment leases;. Since those 0--ttvictive covenantii are contractual agreements between private par4tes, tlT- are not gonerally a matter of concern ^yo the Commission. komsysr, since some amateurs who tatwanttd In this Proc0*dtn57 Provided us with examples jf restrictive 1 covenants, they are Included for information. Mr. Eugent p. Thomas of Hollister, Callfarnia Includod In his comrients an extract of the Uciaratlon of Caeenants and Atstrlctlonc7lor Ridgemark Estates, County Of San Bonito, State of California. It providese No antenna for teansnelssion or reception of radio signals shaft be erected outdoors for use by any dwelling unit except upon approval of the Directors. No radio ur -reievision stggnols or any other form r'f electromagnttic eadintton shalt be permitted to originate from any lot which may unreasonably interfere with the reception of talovisloil or radio signals upon any atler Tot. Marsh0 l tftison, Jr, Provided a cagy Of the restrictive covenant contained in deeds for the !Bali Martin Addition -f2, Irving, Texas. -it Is binding upon all of the IrAdners or purchasers of the tots in the said addition, his or their heirs. executors, admintsirators or assigns. it reads: No antenna pr tower shall be oracted upon any lot for the purposes of radio operations. WIiI(am J. Hamilton resi:es in an aoart,nent bu:lalhg in UIa4stona, Missouv:, lie cites a clause In his lease prohibiting The erectlon of an antenna. Htl i, I a ` Stotts that he has been forced to give up opscating amateur radio eau },ant except a head -held 2 mater ft,4+� -1+f1� AiHz3 radio 'transceiver. He =Intai ?ris that he should not be penaiized Jus"v bee'rause he lives in an apartment. Other rostrictive,covanants acre less global In scope than,V-0se cited above. For example", Robert Woob purchased a home in Ilouston, Tex"4s. HIS deed restriction prohlbI tail, 0transmgtting or re +.awing antenn4),`o4tending above the roof I i ne,sr $. arataur operators generally oppose rastrlctive covena�rs for several reasons, They maintaia that such restrictions llrnit the place's that they can reslds it they want to - pursue their hobby of amateur raQla. Samo state that they Inpinge co First Amtndmont rights of free %pooch,`'others bailevo that a constitutional right [*,.being abridged because, in their view, e, veryonir has a right t lIV o sccers the airwaves regardless of rhort they+, 9. The contrary otilef hold by housing subdivision cowunitles ae!i condominimum or homeownerfs associations is that hmatour radio,inste►Ilettons constitute vafety hazards,, cause InterfertnCo to other Coctraitc equipment which may bs aperatod in the home (televisions, radio, steraos) or are eyesores that detract frcim the aesthetic and tasteful ippearanee of the housing development or apartment complax. To cacsntoract these nogative eonsagyences, the subdivisions and assocl4tIOns ;nclude in vholr cieads, leases or oy -laws restrictions and iioltations �Vn the location and height of antennas -..", In scime eases, prohibit thew altogether,. The restrictive covenants are contalnod la the contrgctuat agreement entered into at the time of the sale or lo&w* of the property, Purchasers or lessees are free to choose whether they vish to reside whare.�such restrictions on amateur antennas are in affect or setttt elsewhere,` i-t rte �+antt 10. The Capartment of Defense fOOi?i.�tupported the ARRt and emphasized In its cc'AmeftTs that continued success ot•`esristing national security and emergency preparedness telecanmurelcationt plans involving amateur stations would be sevaraly diminlshad If state and local ordinances Aare allowed to prohibit the construction and Usage of effsetive amateur transmission ~i facilities. DOD utilizes volunteers In -ter Military Affiliate Radio Sirvics (MARS)4, Civil Air Patrol (CAMP) a0d the Radio Amatenr Civil Emergency Service tRACESl, It points out that these volunteer communicators are operating t radio equl;rrent Installed In tnetr homes and that undue restrictions on 4 fP4S i; ;oialy ur er t *,' sus;l as of the mllitary wnica racrults volunteer a.tateur operators to render assistance to it, ?hE GarmtSSipn Is not In4•Civ_, :a tho !AAR$ program. { antennas by local authoritles a2v,6rsely affect their efforts. LOCI ststoi that the responslvenesi:l of these voluntwr systems would be lmpeired if local ordtnancaa.inter #ere with the effectiveness of these importatnt national toI*ccomwnicatton resources. DW favors the Issuance of w ruling that would set i Imlts for loca'i find state rsgulatory.' *die %) when they are r dealing wlth.ai5rfsewr- #attotts. 11, various ihaptors of the American Red Cross also came forward to support tne_ARRl.as request for o ;preemptive ruling. The Red Cross works closely with amateur radio voluniteers. It bellovas that without amateurs' dedicated support, dlsa�ster reli¢tf operations would slgntftcantly suffer and that its ability to serve disaistiVr� victims would bs hampared. 1t fouls that antenna height (Imitations that ipight be Imposed by lace! bodlaw'vlII negatively affect the service mo rendered by the volunteers. 12. Cities and counties fn* various parts of the United Suites filed coowwents In support of the ARRIN request for a Federal preemptioi ruling. The ermments from the .rarector of Civil Defense Port Arthur, Tearals :are representatives 7 74: Amateur Radio Service plays a vital role with wr Civil Cefense progiFam here in Fort Arthur and the desbgn of Yhefa antennes and tovert lands greatly to our ability to communicate during times of disaster. 'r!a do not oeilovs therlb should be any restrictions on the antennas and tourers except leer reasonable safety precautions. Tropidal storms, hurricanes and tornadoes area +gay of life here on the Texas Ij Gulf Coast'and good communications are absolutely essential when preparing for a hurricane and even more so during recovery operations after the hurricane has past. 1.3. The Quarter Century WIreI ass -Assoc iation took a strong stand In favor of the Issuance of a declaratory ruling. it beIIeves that Federal preemption is necessary alo that thero well be uniformity for al Amateur radio installations an private property throughout the UnItod States. 14. in its comments, the ARRL argued that the Commission has the jurisdiction to preempt certain local land use regulations which frustrate or prohibit amateur radio cv!- inicarlons, It said that the appropriate standard in preemption =ass,..' Is not the extent of state and local Interest in a given regulation, but rarrer t`a impact of that regulation on Federal goals. Its position is tnat 'Federal preemption Is warranted whenever Total governmental- regulations relate adversely to the operational aspects of amateur communication, The ARRL maintains that ' 3a-- r � localities routinely employ a variety of land use doetcos to preclude the installation of effective amateur antennas, Including height restrictions, ' condition*[ user permtts, building setbacKS and dlmonsifonal limitations on R antennas. it sees a declaratory ruling of Federai proanption as necessary to cause munict pal ttles to accommodate amateur operator needs' In nand use planning offorts. i 15. James C. 0t „Connartl, an attorney who has represented several 6. amateurs before local zoning huthoritlesp said that requiring amateurs to seek variances or special use approval to erect roasonabill antennas unduly i restricts the operation of amateur startons. He suggested that the Commission preempt zoning ordinancet which [,%post antenna height licits of 4 m: less than 65 feet. He said that this height would represent a reasonable accommocatlon of the communication needs of most watours and tho legitim_te concerns of iocal zoning authorities. 920.651ag QUA= 16. Ths, City of to tiaso, California has a zoning regulation which =ntrols amateur antennas. its comments reflected an attempt to reach a balanced view. This regulatioa has neither the intent, oor tht affect, -of precluding or Inhibiting effective and rellable commvnlcatlons„ Such antennas may be butte as long as tnoeir construction dose not •unreezonably block views or constitute sywe4res. The reasonable assumption Is tnat ftore are always alternativos at a given site for different placement, andlar methods for at thotic treatment. Thus, both public objectives of controlling land use for the public health. safety, and convenience, and providing an effective communications network, can be satisfied. 11, A blanket ruling to ccmpistety sst astde focal control, or a r ;rrji "hich -recognizes control only for the purpose' of safety c= antenna construction, wQutd be contrary to .... legitimate local control. - 17. Comments from the County of San Diego state: White we are aware of the benefits provided by amateur operators, we oppose the issuance of a preemption ruling which ocild elevate 'antenna effectiveness' to a position above all other considerations. We must, horever, argue that the p Iocol government must have the aoiIIty to I ace a reasonable IImltatlons upon the plaeeaent lkfnd ' cantiguratlon of =*tour radio transmlttln4 and, recOving antennas. Such ability is nece ry to assure that tht local drZIslon -ma ,ors have; rho c!jthorIty` protect the Public hok h safety °and aeifar* 6 $i cJtizens. Ir in conclusion, t would ilk* to orghasize an Important d)fferance between your regulatory powers and that of local governments, Your Commisstonrs approval of the preemptive requests would astabltzh a 'national policyt. However, any regulation adopted by a Focal jurisdictionn could be over- turnod by your Commisslon or a court if surh regulation was determined to be unreasonable. 'a. The City cf Anderson, Indiana, summarized so" of the problems that face local communities: I am syMpathstia to the concerns at those antenna ownws send i understand that to gain tht tmum reception frog their dovlcad, optimal iocmtlali�ts necass". lic%ever, the preservation of residential: zoning districts as 111veablef nelghborhoods Is Jeopardlzed by placing thew antennas lh front yards of homes. Major problems-' of public vafety have been encountered, particulariy vision blockage for auto and FJdestr)aa access. in addition, all communities are faced with various but ding lot sizes. '�Aany building lots are so small that established sntbnck requirements tin order to preserve adequate air clod light) are vulnerable to the unregulated placement of these antennas. .the exarclsa of preimptivie authority by the FCC In granting this request would not be in the best interest of the general, public. Iwo. The National Association of Counties (NAC\J), the American Planning Association (APA) and the National Leagus y7 Cities (NLC) ail opposed the issuance of an antenna preen. ^.tion ruling. NACO "emphasized that federal and state power must be viewed in harmony and warns that Fade. -al intrusion into local concerns or` health, safety and welfare could weaken the traditional polfee power exercised by the state and unduly interfere With the legitimate activities of the sTates. NLC bel loved that both { a .. �y. Fad *rat and Iceal Interests can be acp ommdated with6 autherIty to regaal+ets the Installnt! , of amateur Fadf said that the P66 should contxn''0 to leave the Issue a aatennss with the local government and with the stato preempting local alntennas. The APA riqulating amateur ' �d uderol courts. 20. when consider-trig preemption, we must begin with tvo constitutional erovlslans The ton -h amendrasnt provides that any powers which the constitution et:thsr does not delegate to the United Stns *ss or does net prohibit the states tram exsrctsing arts reserved to the states. These" are the ponce powers of the statse The Supremacy clause, however, provides that the constitution and the_Iews of the united States shall' supersede any_statr law to the contrary; Article Iii, Section 2. Given these basic Promises, state laws may be pris"pted in three ways -:first, Congress tmey expret] ly preempt the state lair: See . , -,— firth AaekIng Co., 430 U.S. 319, 525 (1977)., Or, Congress may Indicates Its Intent to completely occupy a given f1eid so that any Stott lea enaompasssd oritl'l that field wcutd Impl(city be preempt*d. Such Intent to preempt could be fcrind In a cone "essianai recgulatory,scheme that was so pervasive thSt It Would be seasonable)to assume that Congress old not Intend to permit the stq')a to supplenersnt It. S40 at e lt+„y runts' nvtnnr b L2an Assn vi_An 1A _,,.ztzk 458 U.S. 141, 153 (1982). Finally, preserption may be warranted when :state taw Contitcts with federal to*. Such conflicts may occur when wits: bath Federal and state regulations is a physical ImDOSSihIlity, ", FInrida 1 ime i Ay =ado gyever`, 1 2,y. amid, 373 U.S. ISZ, 142, 143 (1963), car whom,- stag: law 1PsTands as an obstacle to the accomgilshment and exe.eutlon of the fuii.purposos and obascttves of Congress." Hines v, ngytdQAJjZ,, 312 U.S. S2.47 (1941). Feurthsrmore, federal regulations have the same preemptive affect as federal statutes. FfdgIl1v Fftd CaI Sa_v,_in��r Lan RsA=1A1ten do C1011M. 51u rm. 27. The situation before us requires us to determine the extent to which state and local xantng regulations may cant IIct with federal policies concern:t:,amntaur radio operators. 22. irew .- atte5� comlAg before us present such a clear dtoitotomy of viewpoint .as dce, the instant issue. The cities, count t::..ibcaI communities and nouiing asscclotions see an obligation to at of -+hair cil7txens and try t 'address -heir carcerns This is at:compiished through regular1or,S, ordinarcas or covenants oriented toward tna health, safety and gsner. ", welfare of -nose tnsy regulate. At the opposite yoie era the `rtduai = ^r-aur 0;4.ira -ors and their su ;ppert Srcups who are trou'blots bv`'t est re;utwI-Jons e 'ch :ray in.ni2it the use a: amateur S -a"OnS ©:, i'4 some *0Sttr V5, TO-$tly preclude amateur communications. Allgned with the cperators t'e sucn entities as the Department of Defense, the American Pad Cross and 'acal civil defense and emer4ancy organizations Kno have fcun! ;n Ar.atour Radio a pcot of $kilted radio opera mere and a z� it 71 1 readily available backup network. In this situation, we believe it is appropriate to stiko a balance between the federal Interest In promoting amateur oporatl,"�% and the legitimate interests of local governments In rtgu fat Ing locai zoning matters. The cornerstone on xhlch we vile predicate cw! decision is that a reasonable acc alien may be mace tatween the two sides. C? 23. Preemption Is prtmattIy a funct(Oft of the extent of the con III or betwoon federal and state and local regulation. Thus, in considering whether our r*94101013s or policies can tolerate a state rogsilation, we may consider such facto -s as the sevorlt�+ of the coofIlot antl the reasons,# underlying the state =s regulations. In this regard; ww have previously recogniaod the legitimate and Important state interests raflaected in lcocal4. zonleg regulations. For examp1*0 In Earth SetalIits Coweunications, Inc., 99 FCC 20 !.223 (1903 ), we recognized that - . counterval I Ing state interests inhere In the present silvation . . . For axamplo, we do not os :sh to preclude a statwR or locality from exorcising jurisdiction over certain elements of i an SMATY,.operation that proporly may fal l within Its aetr,rlty, such as zoning Vr public safety and hosith, provided the rogulzilon to question Is not undertaken as a pretext for the actual purpose of fru#rat'ng achievement of the proominent federal objectives and so long as the non - federal regulation 's applied In o nondiscrAmInatory mannor. 24. Simliariy, we recognize hare that there are certain general state and local Irterests which may, In their even - handed application, legit imatoly affect amateur radio facilities. Nonetheless, these is also a strong federal Interest in promoting amateur coaomunications. Evidence of this interest may be found to the comprehensive salt of ruins that the CorAmisslgn has adopted to regulate the asmatour service.3 Tha,.- rules sot forth procedures for the ilconsing of stations and operators, frequency aliccations, technical standards which amateur radio equipmer, must slot and 000rating practicos which amateur operators must follgm. We roes -)nIa* the Amateur radio sorvico as a voluntary, noncomniercla coswi( cation service, particularly with respect to providing emorgenc. coeV Wcations. Moreover, the amateur radio service provides a reserve. of trained operators, technicians and electronic experts who can to catiec on to times of national or vocal emergencies. By Its nature, tnp Amatl•:.,- Radio Service also provtees the opportunity for Individual operators j to further international goodwiil. Upon weighing those Interests, we 47 CFR Part 97. 10 believe Polley It Warranted. State and local reguIdTions to Preclude amateur communications, in their COnmnitie*"-.,)r*.'1n cc:- react preempted. d fjlct with federal object:vas and must be 25. Bec"'o amateur station c=municatlons are only as effective as the antennas i4j)Oyed, iji'.tanna hililg-0 restrictions directly affo— the effectiveness e �"amateur commun lcatl6ns. Some rwat*ur antenna ' 5,onf Igurations\ quire more substantial ln3t&ltat,-Ons than otters If they are to PrOvIde +As amateur operator with the cOp=nlcqtjQAVL that he/she desires to engage In. For exampl*,-an antenna artNy for International anatwr COMMun lCations wl I I -dI ff*r from an antenna used to contact amateur operators at short.�- distances. We will not, however, spealf Particular height 4 [Mltstldn r� b*jOW Which a Y tny regulate, nor -*III we suggest ocal 9OWImInt may not gqest the precise language that must be contaired In local ordinancosp such as mechanisms or con0tional u.e permits. for sP*c[41 oxceptions, variances, Nevertheless, local rs§alatlonis which Involve PlOcemsn", scresr4ng, or height of antennas b0sed an health, safety, or aesthetic con-; I derat Ions must be crafted to accommodate reasonably amateur communications, and to represent the minimum practicable regulation to accomplish t*ia local authorityes legitimate purpose. 6 26. 0�4�-tr'-Isly, we do not have the staff or financial resources to review ad I state dad local laws ",.t affect amateur -operatTjons. We are confident, howavtj-, Mat stare and 'local governments will endeavor to legis,'ItO In a M.fnel- that affords appropriate recognition to the Important federal interest it •Stake here and T.- er*by avoid unnecessary confilctr with , federal policy, as vall -s time-consuming and expensive litigation In this .irea. Amateur oiler—'tors wno zel love the - t--3-3ty have arecluded accomplishment of their Caen overroach1%; -- ' t 1=11 Or state governments have ieg(timate communications goals, may, In ad4li•Ion, use this document to bring our policies tO.Tha attention of local trlzunals and forums. 6 We ralreraTe rhat our ruling rerein does not reach restrictive covenant; In private contractual agreements. Such agreaftnts are voluntarily entered nTO by the buyer or tenant when the agreement is executed and do not .;wally concern this Cowlsston. - �. ^ 27. ftCordlogly,�the Request for Declaratory Ruling filled July 15 14134. by the Aawrlcaoa R dto Re_cy League, Inc., IS GRANTED to the axtist Indicated herein and', In all other respects, IS DENIED. , Q) pED€RA1. C6WUNMATIONS C"ISSION Wtillam J. Trlcartcd Secretary a ! V C" GA fr{Oid .. A 0 C cu of RANCH ..•'L�izr�rmtvw .Glee CITR p�NNIKC+G11YiS;QN ' ,ate OCT � � 198u f1 I � "a R� 2 t%4k5k6 NU ZR ONE ClV1C CENTER CIRCLE SLS�L'.I�SII FOURTH L. HACKM FLOOR AN P.O 90K loss +I ANOREw V. ARCZYNSKt ORCA.CALIFORNIA P2522•1059 RALPH O. HANSON O.f4,AIG FOX hl�l 9(J,✓t?'C3C1 MARTHA TELEPHONEf MARTH JO OEfs L.i,p - i2f31 691-3811 October 20, 1986< George J. Rohrer Attorney at Law Rohrer & Holtz A Professional Law Corporation 1421 North Brookhurst Street Suite 125, Anaheim, California 92801 is Re,:, Charles I- etnagel ry Dear Mr. lohrei:: Thank you for providing this office with the federal and state authority dealing with amateur radio antennas. The federal case, in particular,, was enlightening with regard to the FCC's limited --p-motion. That preemption appears to be identical to their earlier announced preemption dealing with satellite dishes. After reviewing the text Of the FCC's preemption as stated in tha rhernes case, the r_e_'ent: question appears to address itself primarily toward development stand-%-ds applicable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. More specifically, althrugh the FCC has imposed a limited preemption dealing with re4-ulation of amateur radio antenna heights, it is tAe opinion of this office that existing regulations, arguably impacted thereby, are not rendered inva,lil unless the public entity is unable to articulate a legitimate health, safety or welfare interest furtYlered thereby. This is rot to say that specific reasons for an anterna height limitation, for example , need be articulated before such a standard is imposed. it is our position that the requisite 'lealth, safety or welfare consider- ations are implicit in the SJ foot height restriction, just as such concerns are implicit in any number of structural regula- tions and standards. 1 t C As you seem to be generally familiar with the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 17.04.040 dealing with "variances may provide some further relief, for you;; client. As with all1,� variances, t=he procedure is prcavid: *d in arar- to accommodate special tooagraghiccl -or other" physical, conditions peculiar to a particular piece of property. in the event you are unfattilia;, with the provisions; of Section 37.44.040, we have enclosed a copy cf that section for ymur us'e M4 summarize, although we acknowipdge the limited ore - emb:ion anr;auhced by the FCC, tie do.zot believe that its lanquaaa invalidatzs'tection 17':0s,060 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code'dealing with antenna height--, Relief.. w the restrictions of that section might possibly tae ro obtained through the use of variance procedures railable. Should you care to discuss th�s,;matfier at J.I length, please dc.not hesitate to contact "the undersaned at vo, convenience, or fee: free to discuss this matter with City Your convenience, sta. Very, "truly yours,, _ w. Craig Fox y Deputy City Nittorney DCF:Ijl City of Rancho Cucamonga Incl. r CC., B-ad Buller, City Planner ,. 1 , Ji RESDLUTIQN NO- 87-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE Kr 1",140 CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING VARUNCE NO 64-68 TD 'WAIVE THE M IMUM HEIGHT 2EQUIREt 11T FOR A AAITs NKA LOCATED AT 5327 CAROL AVENUE IN THE VERY LOW HESIOENTIAL DISTRICT A. ' RCITALS {iD Qn gectr r 7 1393, the City Council Of the Cfty of Ran4' o Cuc 809a adopted grdfnanc` 211 providing for the rsgulation of antennas. On November 14, 1936, an aptl14Qtf0O was filed and accepted on the above- descriIteC, (fit) on january 2$, 1987, the piasning CcEWssiGn held a duly advertised pub.:: hearing pursuant tm Section 65$64 of the Califoenia Government Code. 8.�ESi ;E tif41L°.. TN£REFORE the Rancho Cud: le foll*wa,- a Planning Cawsissiar resolved as I. 1711is COWSSIOA hfreby specifically ffnds that all #9se facts set forth in the gecitais, Fart A, of COY "Qct. this Resolution ors true and 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this crW scion during the above- referenced January 28, 1983 hearing, fncludfng the w ftten Staff MPOrrt, aMd the writt 1, signed and vewiffed application of the applicant, this CQ=f0ion hereby specifically of as folios: a. The application applies to PI'Operty located at $327 Carol AvenJ* On ,a lot prosently ieproved with a house, garage and a 50 foot radfa s.U:tanna; b. The property and surmun'Sing, properties are in the + Very tow Rdsl*ntial District; C. The existing '6o foot radio aotenn: does not comply with the 35 foot height llnft when �t in use LunextessdadD as a�asurod frog `round level as required by NvelopmMt CrAl SectiOn 17.08.060I. Further, the application requests to extend the antenna height to 70 feet; `,!7-7 `7771 ReSOTUV06`40. VARIAKE 86-08 January 28, 1987, Page 2 d. The existing 50 foot r4dfO ant"na wai �.erected Without proper p#Mfts,for the footings prior to I;Onstruction. Based upom sutstafttial��tvidtnCft Pr2SOted tp this Comisslon during the above-raftreftmd JinUary 28,, -1937 hearing, and upon the specific findings Of facts �et forth in Paragraphs I and 2 above, ttyls Comtssion htraby ffnft iind conclude$ as follows.. a. That strict or litoral intirprotati d enforce"'ot on an Of t* Specified regulation, - jould not result In practical difficulty CP unn*CeUdVY PhYsital hardshtp Ineonsistant with tjw Obj%tfv" of the Developmnt Code. b. That there are no eneptio"T extraordinary circumstances or conditfoas to 06, able t* 04 property "of inva or to tM jRV*njMd �Uiii the proWty tilat do not apply ciftralij t� other pr'"Ortim f-n the saw di, strACt, co That strict or literal in,Wprotation and enforcewnt Of the speciflad reguUtfon muld not dtpriv* the applicant Of 'enjoyed by the owner$ of other Properties in tho San odstrict. d. That, the granting of *0 Wartanm will constitute a grant of speci-41 prfvtl*" incOmSisUnt, with tho limftAtions on other prvWties classified I the saw (T e. That the granting of tft Variam'14 will be detrimental to the public hes.1th, Welty, or Welfare, or Uterially irdurious, to propokiies or Improwaftnts in the vicinity. 4. Wad upon the findings and CMIUSiOns sot forth in Paragraphs 2 and 3 above, this COMISSIO" hartuy denies the application. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARYS 1987. �`,� it PLANNING CO 011 CITY'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA av rman ATTEST: r, Pu Y ;re ary ,. - t. Brad BuileM DeputY Secretary of the Plar,sin r Rancho LucaMonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing essi n Of as City aof regularly introduced, passed, and aoopted by the Plan,in� Carnission of the C11y of Rancho Cucamonga, at a ragular muting of the P] °a �n9 on the 28th day of January, 2987, by the following vote -t ! PIng CoutaisSi.o1r held AYES: COMMISSIONERS., EMERICK, CHITIEA, BARKER., MCNtEL, TOLSTOY k. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE- 1r `, I'i � T TANNING COMMISSIOR MINUTES - JANUARY 28, 1987 - FOR DISCUSsION PURPOSES K. ENVIRONMENTAL 1`SSESSP�yENT AND Ve .iIANCE 86 -08 "= SPETNAOE'�'- A. request to waive t e ma mum height rerui. ment o eqt or axed radio antenna to allow an existing antenr?'50 feet in height to be extended to 70 feet on a __47 acre parcel 'Jn the Very Low Residential Distriot: (less than 2 Dwelling`cnits,per acre) located at 5327 Carol Avenue - APM 1061 - 111 -19. Greg Gage,'AssistoI Planner, presented the staff report. Coi nissioner Emeric": asked if the regulations are 35 why the applicant has an existing 50 foot antenna. Mr Gage advised that the antenna was installed without the City's review or approval. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Chrles Spetnagel, 5327 Caron Avenue, stated that on May 29, 1986 he attempted - to secure a building permit for a 35 foot antenna tower. His intent was to t erect the tower and then seek, permitsion to construct the tower to the height F he desired. The Planning Division and Engineering Divisions both approved his E- application and signed .off on the building permit form. Building and Safety informed him that his drawings for the footings were unacceptable and the tower would have to be installed a�, if jet were a flag pole. He was told that the depth of the footing would have to de 1 foot fo every 2 feet in height. It He informed Building and Safety that this was ridiculous and that the drawings t were done by a reputable erector of commercial and amateaur towers. He became frustrated and cancelled the,,application and obtained a refund of permit fees. He advised that the tower is; of proven design and has been on the market for over 20 years and the footings, are capable of supporting towers up to 300 feet in height. He acknowledged that the City has legiti;nate health, safety and welfare concerns but the footings were installed per manufacturers instructions. These instructions had been reviewed and approved by a registered civil engineer licensed in the state of California. He stated that his station operates under automatic control as a relay station available 24 hours a day for amateur's in four counties. He felt that an extraordinary condition does exist, that a nonconformity does not exist, consequently nothing was self- imposed and the only special privilege was his privilege to operate an amateur radio station. He indicated that staff fails to address the exclusion of public service, public welfare, and emerge»cy radio from height restrictions. He felt his suppn�ting documents proved that hart of the justification of the amateur radio, Zqrvice is to provide emergency communication and an amateur radio is con',i,14ously involved in public service activities. He stated that his request for 70 feet is the minimum height required to accommodate reasonable communication on the frequencies on which he operates. Chairman Barker questioned the height of the tower. s� ��T 1.1 Mr. Spetnagel advised that the tower is 50 feet in height. Chairman Barker asked if a vertical antenDa. was placed on top of that height. Mr. Spetnagel replied that this was correct and that he used a high frequency agge., antenna. Commissioner Emerick asked Mr. Spetnagel if he had any feedback from his neighbors a3 fai- as the current antennas. Mr. Spetnagel stated that fie contacted the three properties directly abutting his and those property owners indicated no objections tn ti�� tower. He indicated that he had poled Ban and Hiedi Burns, Thomas and Martha Stanton and Betty and Don Anderson. Commissioner Emerick asked if the height of the antenna would impinge upon anyone's view of the mountains. Mr. Spetnagql stated that he didn't feel toe tower would impinge'any more than the current transmission lines. j P Commissioner. Tolstoy asked if Mr. Spetnagel was prepared to show the Commission wt,QZ_ is planned for the top of the tower. Mr. Spetnagel replied he was not and indicated that this information had not been requested before tonight. Chairman Barker asked if Mr. Spetnagel cons, m�l J crank up antennas when t4is equipment was purchased. Mr. Spetnagel advised that he had owned this tower for a number of years. Wayne Overveck, 900 Avenida Salvatore, San Clemente, professor of communications, California State University, Fullerton, supported the applicant's request. He presented slides which he felt illustrated why a radio amateur would want a high antenna. He stated that what amateaur radio is all about is emergency communication, which is why the FCC has ��ecently issued an order pre-emting local regulations that unreasonably restrict-and deny reliable amateaur communications. Chairman Rarker asked since this particular piece of property is located at the ilorthern part of Alta Loma on a slope what kind of impact would that lor,ation have an the signal's angle of entlZy- Mr. Overveck advised that a location on a slope working in the uphill direction raises the angle and makes communication more difficult. rn the downhill dirLction, it makes long distance communication easier because the angle is lowered by the terrain. ' Chairman,Barker asked if .Mr. Overveck was an expert on antennas. ' Mr. `,eck advised that he had written a book and a number of journal article�,,'on antennas. Chairman Barker asked if there were any advantages —of self supporting towers yr over the crank up :antennas, - - ,• _ ,s - Mr. Overveck advised that this is a question of eco'homics. A self supporting tower is more expensive. A typical model crank up guyed tower As a much less expensive tower. A crank up tower that is self supporting and could meet the City's code -�)f staying below 35, feet and going up to 50 feet would be quite a bit more expensive than one that doesn't telescope without guy wires. i Commissioner Tolstoy questioned the 80 meter frequency and asked if it,;was correct that there are lather frequencies for emergency communications. ?. Mr. Overveck atated that therel� are other frequencies for emergency communication. He advised that the: applicant proposes to communicate on a variety of different frequencies. Each of the.various frequency bands have different propagation characteristics. 80 meters comes up sometimes because : historically during the Mexico City earthquke it was used extensively for - long distance night time ;communication. ' Commissioner Toistoy asked the cotsmunicatiostdistance of 80 meters at might. Mr. Overveck advised that imp? operator would be capable of world wide communication assuming conditions are'reasonahte. Tony Petrone, 125 Morgan Way, Upland, supported the request. He gave an overvie'; of the emergency communications aspect of amateaur radios. ftnald Verdon, 5068 Ada Court, Chino, supported the applicant's request and gave an overview of emergency corindinications. Jan Burns, 5321 Carol, adjacent property owner stated that he had no problems with Mr. Spetnagel's antenna as presently constructed. He did not feel the presence of the antenna would affect property values. Sandy Spetnagel, wife of the applicant, supported the request. She advised that the Spetnagels work with the Boy Scouts and urged the Commission's support of the request. Ed Combs, 7027 Valind�, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that he felt the tower could be seen at the 35 fjot height, therefore could not understand the height concerns. He stated ;hat Mr. Spetnagel has one of the best sites in the area for the private radio tower. The following individuals addressed the Commission in opposition to the AWL Variance request based on aesthetic concerns, interferrence with television,, reception and luss of property values: John Waymeier, 8149 Lucinda I Dick Miles, 5262 Sapphire Barbara Frye, 5327 Della Penny Senzero, 8181 Lucinda Jeff Frye, 5327 Del1e Sonny Senzario, 8181 Lucinda Tom Armejo, 5249 Carol Cheryl Ward, 8153 Lucinda Elliott Cousins, 8214 Lucinda Etbel Wa�aneier, 8149 Lucinda Commissioner Chitiea asked thze applicant if he was only person with a tower in the West End area. Mr. Spetnagel adi"vised that he was not'j i Commissioner Chitiea asked if there are other people communicating onthese frequencies. Mr. Spetnagel assumed there are. He rebutted the comments made during the public hearing by stating that the existing tower was erected ten moni,hs ago, and clarify that it was installed the last week 4nd, in August 19861 As he previously stated, he attempted to obtain a building permit but felt he--was getting no where therefore decided to pursue another course of actin. He advised that since these proceedings, he had spoken to the City's Building and Safety Department again and asked 'them what the requirements were for footings. He indicated he met those requirements. He had a California License Civil Engineer's calculations and data sheets signed off by him and was not concerned that this tower is unsafe in its present condition or at the proposed height. He advised that he visited Scott Cable, who furnishes cable for this area, and was informed that entire system outages as well ,.s section outages during the past few months were due to the merger of Scott Cable with Acton Cable, Further, that Scott Cable agreed to conduct test if complaints of interference continues to verify that Mr. Spetnagel's station is not interferring with the cable system. He also verified that he had no cable channels operating on frequencies assigned to the amateaur radios. He felt that objections to his station regarding aesthetics are subjective. if aesthetics alone are allowed to dictate what structures are or are not allowed in the neighborhood, then everyone should have the right to raise objections to the color a neighbor paints his house, the type of shrubs planted and so on. Commissioner Emerick asked if Mr. Spetnagel mentioned he ha(� contacted the City prior to erecting the tower. Mr. Spetnagel replied that he did. 1, J. 9 M-1 `. ` CnmmissiooarEmerink questioned how many times the City had been contacted. Mr. Spetnagel advised that he had the City once. Commissioner Emer1ck 'asked if Mr.' - was informed of the '` — '"' t regulations. Mr. Spetnagel advised that he provided with a copy of Section � 17^080.60 of theDevmTopment Code. ' Commissioner - reaz height standard for a stationery tower and 15 feet additional fdI an `- e—' tNit cioes up or down. Mr. Spetnagel sti�ed that the conflict was is the term when in use. He contended that his"�*tation it' X.-ailable 24 hours a day. " h~ Commissioner Emerick' %�ed if Mr. Spetnagel was home 24 hours a day. ; However, | � " be operated twmeroui,,�imes during the day. Commissioner Mrs. Spetnagel operates the radio, or if anyone 1 � else `o the rum1\X the ability tu the radio. j ! ~ ' Mr. ~h ea neither �th=r his wife nor the rest of thefnmily the � ability to operate the radio n ° 1 � Commissioner Emeripk asked if Mr. Spetnagel had a 40 hour a week4,-Ib. ' Mr. Spetnagel replied that it-was much morwthan 40 hours a week. � Chai if the term we operable or operating. He asked --f the ` ` station transmits all the time. nr operating all the time, but it is capable of repeating digital transmissions. Chairman Barker asked if Mr. Spetnnqe was recording the messages. ` Mr. �W replied that t� � �� b�� . �=� ���os a� n recorded; �, they are — stored in a buffer if he cares to ss it. .,"��- Commio°innmr Tolstny asked if this is a repeater station. Mr. 3petnagel replied that it is. Chairman Barker asked if other units depend on the existence of that packet digit peter to continue to function during the day. , ` ^ ^ = Mr., Spetnagel stated that on its present frequency he has reception to palm Springs and Hemet that repeats both ways in the Los Angeles basin, Orange IMF County, and along the coast line up to LAX. Commissioner Chitiea recalled that Mr. Spetnagel said he contacted the City once and because of the information he received he ;decided to go ahead and build his tower. She questioned why he didn't approach soursne else or try to go through proper channels. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was -closed. Chairman Barker stated he would like to try and eliminate some of the side issues so the Commission could 1 dentify the real issue oi, which to make a decision. As far as the tci Avision or any other interi``^ence with high fidelity equipment, he indicate that if the applicant °s equ', nt is good equipment and the neighbors egittpvient is good equipment there s1lould not be a problem. He pointed out that iraaitionally amateaurs have gore out of their way to : _iotify their neighbors t1� they are available to ��P them work out problems so that their reputation as ham operators remain.; very high. He did not think interference wa a major issue and suggested that the Commission not address that issue. He 1, ated the reason for the discussion of the various types -and designs of antennas was because of a concern with safety factors. The winds are emphatic and sometimes certain types of antennas can be dangerous. Aesthetics is important but he felt there was aL technical point to be addressed which is that there can be an antenna -35 feet -in height which can crank up to 50 feet. Tr!s particular antenna does not meet those standards. He advised that he had 16ked through recent antenna sales and there are a number of antennas which can resch 50 feet which go,',down as low as 22 feet in a depressed state. He felt the two issues to be "addressed are: is this an unusual enough situation to warrant a variance, was there no other - equipment t% available which could have been purchased and placed into operation, and is the regulation itself in need of being evaluated. Commissioner Emerick stated that obstruction of view should be addressed not from an aesthetic point but from a property right point. A property owner is entitled to a certain view right of the mountains and the valley. An obstruction of that view impinges upon someone else's property rights. Commissiothr MCNiel disagreed. He suggested that the Commission act on the issue of the illegal antenna. Commissioners Emerick and Tolstoy stated their opinion that the issue was the Variance and if the necessary findings could be met to approve a Variance.. Chairman Barker suggested that the Commissioners,;go through each of the findings to see if they could be met. Commissioner Emerick addressed finding one. and stated that everyone in a Zoning district should be treated equally .unless they can show a hardship situation. He saw no hardship in this situation in that the applicant could move his antenna to another location or implement some mitigation measures such as a tower 35 feet stationary with a 16 foot crank up 'extension. If that's not high enough to meet the required specifications as far as length of radio beam, so be it. The Commissioners concurred. Chairman Barker suggested there are a number of alternative types of antenpas that could be used which would comply with the City's code, rzquirements. 'He asked that fj;nding 2 be addressed. Commissioner Emerick stated there has been no showing that, there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances associated with this request. The applicant lives in the foothills of the City and there he is faced with both an advantage and a disadvantage. The disadvantage is going down hill where the radio angle is` increased; the disadvantage is that the angle is decreased' an the uphill. mountain side.. He stated that this not a unique property in that there are literally hundreds of other houses in that same stratification of the foothills. With respent to finding 3, he did not concur that there was a deprivation of privileges enjoyed by others. Tt:e 35 foot standard for fixed towers applies to everynne in the City. Regarding finding 4, he stated this variance is granted to allow a higher tower up to,70 feet, that would be granting a special privilege that can't be demonstrated by any of the facts presented in this hearing. Motion: Moved by Emerick, seconded by Chitiea, to deny Variance,-,86-07. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS EMERICK, CHITIEA, BARKIR, MCNIFL, TOLSTOY COMMISSIONERS: NONE COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried Chairman Barker directed ,staff to conduct a survey of the materials on the market and the names of the manufactures to assure that there are appropriate types of towers that fit within the framework of the City's current. regulations. Commissioner Tolstoy aked what would be the disposition of the illegal tower. Mr. Buller advised that staff will proceed with Code Enforcement action and the applicant will be given a reasonable time to abate the antenna. r� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAlfiONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING VARIANCE NO. 86- 08QAMENDED� TO WAIVE THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENT FOR;, EXTENOA$LE ANTENNA LOCATED AT 5327 CAROL AVENUE IN' THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT A. RECITALS (i) Oa December Cucamonga adopted Ordinance 211 providing or' the regulation of antennas. (11) (it) On Kdvember 14, 1986, an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project. On March 25, 1987, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pdrsuant to Section 65$54 of the California Government );.ode. B. RESOLUTION j NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancno Cucamonga planning Cortmission resolved as follows: I. This Commission hereby spec;"�irAlly finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and ccrrect. '- 2. Based upon suGstant3al, 1. vidence presented to this Cows, ion Srira the aqo ! referenced March 26, 1987 hearing, - fncluaing the wri#ett Staff Report, and the Written, signed and verified � \pplication of the applicant, this C.' i sion hereby specifiolly finds as follows.. a. The application appi•ies tG property located at 5327_ Carol Avenue on a lad presently improved with a house, garage and a 'ju ;aot radio antenna;: b. The property and surrounding pro pertiesiare in the Very Low Residential District; 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission daring the above- referenced ;,March 25 1987 hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Comml$sion hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpr Litation and enforcement of the specified regulption mold not result in practical dif#'iculty or unnecessar,Y physical hardship inconsistent with the ataject ves of the Development CodaL PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.. VARIANCE 86 -08 - SPETNAGEL March 25, 1987 Page 2 b. The there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable t;, the property involved or to the intended u— - the property that do not apply generally zu other properties in the same district. c. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. d. That the granting of the Variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties 4lassified in the same district. e. That the granting of the Variance will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially Injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs - 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. API'=VED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- E. David ar, er, Cha irman ATTEST Bract Buller, Deputy secretary 0 I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that tl�* foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1987, ty the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: U DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY IO�'IF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT CJ�� NL•\9• C z March 25, 198719 %� Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Greg Gage, Assistant Planner TIM€ €XTENSI314 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERVIT 84 -21 - 1LTA 'L RV request-to convey an exi—"' ti rig square ° 5 ?5o srn'Te family residence to an ofrsce for the Alta Loma thi =.:?tian Church on .25 acv2s of land in the Low Residential than 2 dwelling units per Aci,i), located on the west side of Sapphire, across from orange - APN 1052- 332 -23. (Continued from January 28, 14871 I. BACKGROUND: At• its meeting or. January 14, 11387, the Planning omm ssron continued the above referenced time extension request to the - January 28 meetinn. Staff requested the continuance to allow the church ample time ,i clean ip and re -seed its vacant property to the north of the office and pre - school facilities. Prior to the Planning Gommssion meeting of January 28, the resident at 6375 .Sapphire submitted two letters which reiterated previous concerns about the church prop_;,ty. Specifically, the resident was concerned about the impact of the vacant church property on surrounding properties, and the compliance of the adjacent c1-,+1rLh pre- school with approved operating s. After reviewing the issue at its January 28, 1987 meeting, the l Comhni ssi on determined that the necessary clean up and seeding had not been completed. The Commission then continued the item to tonight's meeting and directed the church to proceed with the improvements. II. ANALYSIS: The church has since completed the clean -up and re seaing of the vacant property (see attached letter) and installed a stand -pipe for irrigation purposes. An inspection of the site conducted on March 18, 1987 revealed that germination of the seed had occurred, however the moisture content of the soil was relatively low. This can be attributed to the limited irrigation facilities which have been i ^stalled and could cause tho'-:seed tom: die out from lack of moisture. In ac(=dance with the request of the resident at 63:5 Sapphire, the adjacent church pre- school was also inspected for compliance with ip roved hours of operation. No violations were evident at the tlml of inspection. I)tM 3 F m ,µ17, 1're ? �117 k4l PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT w CUP 86 -41 - ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH March 25, 1987 L Page 2 i ~ The vacant; chukh property should be monitored by staff to ensure' that landscaping_ is properly irrigated and maintained in an acceptable manner. Also, the pre - school . facility should be checked ' periodically to verify that all conditions of approval are being °i observod. If either of the aforementioned issues is determined to s be in violation, the problem" should b6- referred to the Commission for review, acid if necessary, re',ocati,,i of Conditional Use Permit M 83 -04 should be considered. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the ;Planning Commission approve a. one -ye4r time extension for Gond3tional use Permit 8441, and that the Comission advise the' church to provide' proper irrlptiof and routine maintenance of all vacant property north of the existing facii ties Re ctfuily suamltled, '._ Brad S er City Planner 88:GG.sgr qw Attachments: Letter from Resident - -at 6375 Sapphire f Letters from Applicant Exhik t "A" - Location flap Exhibf;; "8" - Master Site Plan Exhibit' "C" - Elevations 11 Plar.,jing'CojRRission Staff Report, January 28, 1987 J f Planning Commission Staff Report, January 14, 1987 Planning Commission Staff Report, ;ir.Jember 28, 1994 Resolution of Time Extension is First things first, Before a time extension is ,granted, how about enforcing conditions an other CUP concerning the Alta Loma Christian Church. Foy lowing conditions are not being enforced: 2- Staff Report 9 Jan 85 A- Groundcover and irrigation system 2- Resolution 83 -55, Section 3, Ztem #7 Outdoor preschool activity hours The hours are not being observed or enforced. During i co'? weather yes at times. But during warm weather the children are outdoors several hours in the AM and after lunch, most of the aft#Artr nn The hours are 10:34 -i1 45 and 4 -5, Not all clay or when ever they feel like it. The continuous, noise of the children yelling and screaming has causRd problems. Better control and observing the approved hours would be appreciated. Also, the outside play ground is being used at times on Sundays. W.H. Ungles W. H,. Ung7.es �i 6375 Sapphire Alta Loma �, 24 Jail, 87 :. Planning Division f Rancho Cucamonga Re- 7 Extension for Conditional Use Permit 84- 21 is First things first, Before a time extension is ,granted, how about enforcing conditions an other CUP concerning the Alta Loma Christian Church. Foy lowing conditions are not being enforced: 2- Staff Report 9 Jan 85 A- Groundcover and irrigation system 2- Resolution 83 -55, Section 3, Ztem #7 Outdoor preschool activity hours The hours are not being observed or enforced. During i co'? weather yes at times. But during warm weather the children are outdoors several hours in the AM and after lunch, most of the aft#Artr nn The hours are 10:34 -i1 45 and 4 -5, Not all clay or when ever they feel like it. The continuous, noise of the children yelling and screaming has causRd problems. Better control and observing the approved hours would be appreciated. Also, the outside play ground is being used at times on Sundays. W.H. Ungles r_ DAVID Li,F&CL11R`F M ts�s SAPPHiBE $T 61M W1" Ur." Wma CJItlPOR �tY1• March 6, �CCLI�if a.._ 9H7 rr_r of RANctto c_ca:.ia!�ca � . -NImc CIV:S!orr City of Rancho Cucamonga Ala (AAR jU- i �7 Planning Department r�pgr9i,.��.i�:�.ti � .1 P AVtn. Greg Gage r'[_r5, RE: Alta% oma =ChrisY�an Church i Conditfoaal Use Peet)it No. 84 -21 Dear Mr,. Gage, The fillgwing work has' as. been core ie�t undeveloped P'`K - e�•on the P portion o� our church �7o ert • i 1. Grading and Levi-ling ' 'I 2. liydroseeding with swee i t aliysum -which 1 s E highly drought resistent and 1 flowering plant In addition, on Saturday Narch 7, 1987, a I #' stand pipe will be installed in the center o this field for the purpose of watering the,allysum. The watering will be done manually with a "ll" hcse. This should complete the,:-'equirements for our conditional use permit. If `here is any question regarding this matter Please'g•ive us a call. _ i i Sincerely, John Graham President Alta Loma Christian Church f JGlmz A nondkoomjmgorN1 falf0WSh Whav only the Hfblels mU#ht 'a R, rvt ir b 't -9x Ar/ @rf@Ca,�t+�i3.r• $a On��n( G3u.�YS.. @.,40.,v`)x, el s r �_ f Ris t �� - d y'Y i�y � v a #••w tt N = a A iF t JD AML s i tT 1 Y y Ens r » I SITE PLAN m i I i j NORTH IZ A N C'I -'o C UC ' 4 \ lO (Tr1 TITLE all `rba t y • .. ff ' Ri' ��..++ t • 'a }Y }.% to r+ r u ;.j V a �Y n�u�F .•v rmr wa. a+Y.• C J-40 i I h r •F y F. ?TING TiLr li'COt��- TYPICAL y,.± A f f 7N 1! t i J !,. , ! L .�f (� 1 P �,��..y@ f i / 7 r •''• � � � a ill. � rt .t '� a. - , `[AST • N� W DOCJiCDxTL!KGR Wo— timfNG• APPLY. MUI 1R1 ;z GCI,O!C TQ TJ RPOenI Pa1s4cNOC� J'x•17C1y TYrtIGL P� A` r 9 �, I � �� � � cN�lrrr •, ....1�I . ., c1S• ✓ � `'•�•. "J.r S• - � ! ��t •E. iJ 3 Jd,i> iJf J�{ -::.s •aaf „'�,I ?Y: C 7+ � •!.I r, ,;,isa 4• i�• �w. I , 1'rIi J1 j ` (; • . SOUTH 4x�N COp e�IC�[cVla; S A _ �--� / �Exi5TiN6 WeovAIASTMIN A% N15W !9TDRC1-KONi' r'4TWwcb r.. _".� . .r - ±'rt'... -^err• �.! ' 1.:" �.•+. ..�— .,.– _��_........-- _.._..,._ .�'` � � {fit {�'�Y i� J1A. 2t .. �, . s • .WEST - NmW• JX 4 H PIK • J4JLTIPUaroxJPr�gCNpicim bLVab• STAIbi A7 A6oNt, TYPICAL ' 'EXTE1Z1Otz•' �LE�-I°IQh,i �• CITY RANCHO C� ? QNr ITE"l1;� GA TITLE. LE 10 t�S PLANNING DIvvrLSIQN EXHIBIT.--" -C" SCALE. grn- S DATE.: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: — CITY Off' RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT -o G��-4r�yry January 28, 1987 7-97 Chairman and Members of the Planninx Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Greg Gage, Assistant Planner TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -21 ALTA LW CHRISTIAN CHURCH - A conversion of , square foot single am y res erce to an office for the Alta Loma Christian Church on a 25 acre parcel of 'land in the Very Low District (0 -2 dwelling units /acre), located on the u�st side of Sapphire, across from Orange APN: 1062 - 3�2 -23. I, BACKGROUND At its meeting on January 14, 1987, the P1aaning omm ss on continued �,e above referenced Time-Extension Request to tonight's meeting. Staff requested a continuance to allow the church ample time to clean up and reseed its vacant property to the north of the office and preschool facilities. On January 18, 1987, the Planning Division receivad a letter from the resident at 6375 Sapphire, which reiterated previous concerns about the vacant area and its affect on surrounding properties. A clean up and reseeding of the property has not ,vet' been completed. Accordingly, the requested time extension should not be approved until such time that all work is complete on the vacant parcel. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the planning Commissionr continue phis item for 30 days, and direct the church to complete the clean up and reseeding of vacant church property north of the existing facilities. Res fully 's tte ra 11 r City Pla ner BB:GG:vc Attachments: Letter from Resident at 6375 Sapphire Planning Commission Staff Report, January 14, 1987 9 j d F W.H. tingles 6375 Sapphire ;1 ~�A:ta Loth 10 Jan 87 a Planning Division Rancho Curamorga He: Mme Ektension far ConditiLcnal Use Permit 84 2t" I rave no ooacct -ons to the .ntinuation of cup 84 -21 an tL_' II grounds set forth in resoiation 84 -135 dated 28 Nov 84., The " I extension %hould be for another 2 years. But on(. thing bother -S me- how can the City ccrssidesr an extension of a CUP rrrhei the first CUP 83-04 has never beets. £ui].£iliad. A staff repo dated 9 Jan 85 A- GrazdCSxY ier for Ex j7asoa.' graded ".areas, �1 f Thy landscape P called for irrigatian sys3ten and ver on al ,e install an groundxrover rn all'eaxposed areas. his has never been done. The area in question Is an aye -sore, afire hazard arxi just a Jlaeral nuisance. 'For the last couple years during the dry season the residence an the east side 02 Sapphire have been subject to an attart of tumble weeds from the church property, The Alta Loma Christian Church has mare very littlq effort to control the matter. In fact;. in,.Nov 86, they cuL some of the weeds - piled them up along Sapphire on there property and waited until the winds cane to blow the tumble ageds onto Sapphire and the Property on the east side at Sapphire:(the tumble weeds had been piled up;for carer two weeks) The tug)le weeds caused traffic problem and 'idence probleam. ' I had to call Code Enfor= -ent to resolve the Matter. But, time matter still reins. I would like this matter;aolved before we go on. W.H. Ungles BATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT CYCANJO,ti 4 j .3 Ci n _3nuary 14, 1987 1971 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Greg Gage, Assistant Planner TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITION.'U. USE PERMIT 84 -21 - ALTA LUiKA 011ISTIA4 CHURCH A conversion of a 1,ubts square toot singe family residence to an office for the Alta Loma Christian C;iurcn on a .25 acre parcel of lana in the Very Low Residential District (0 -2 dwelling units per acre.), located on the west ^de of .Sapphire, across from Orange. APN: 1052 - 332 - 23. I. ABSTRACT: The Alta Loma Christian Church is requesting a two -year ex ens on of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -21, due to a period of slow growth. The approved 'Conditional Jse Permit allowing the temporary conversion of the single family residence to an office for the cnurcii, was due to expire on November 28, 1986. Although time extensions are normally approved as consent calendar items, this request was advertised as a public hearing due to a newly added condition for utility undergrounding. The Ergineerirg Uivision subsequently determined that it would be inappryCpriate to attach a utility undergrounding condition to this request. The public hearing must oe conducted as advertised. II. BACKGROUWU: The Gommissio.i approved the Condition.," Use Permit on ovemoer 8, 1984 and, directed staff to review an existing Conditional Use Permit f the adjacent church pre - school 1CUP 83_- 04) for r -,:apiiance w4 I the Conditions of Approv?1. Staff identifie& �.averal issutis regarding landscaping, lighting_ wall treatments and hours of operation for review Dy the Planning Commission on January 9, 1985. At the applicant's request, the items were continued to the Planning Commission meeting of January 23rd. At the January 23rd meeting, the Commission reviewed the outstanding issues and determined that the project was substantially in compliance with the Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 83 -04 wits the exception of groundcover installation for erosion control on church property north of the existing facilities. During the hearing, a church representative indicated that the 3.4 acre area was initially seeded wi``n groundcover; however, the seed nod failed since ro irrigaticfi system was installea. The Commission reached the consensus tnit the church should re -seed graded areas with a drought resistant wildflower, without irrigation. PLANNING COMMISS1nu STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -21 : ALTA ,A CHRISTIAN CHURCH January 14, 1567 Page 2 III. ANALYSIS: Review of the site.,has shown that the cnurch has su4stant lly complied with all Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit. No. 84 -21. The Conditions of Approval for the adjacent pre - school (CUP 33 -04) nave not been completed nowever, in that the vacant church property north of the pre - school and parking lot nas become overgrown with weeds and litterecq with debris. The lack of maintenance for the vacant parcel has resulted.in several complaints from adjacent homeowners cinti,�ning :dust ar.6 windbl' wn debris.. I`d. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Development Code allows the Planning omniss on to grant time extensions for _projects in 12v°rwnth increments, if tnere nave oeen no significant changes in the Land Use Element, Development Code, or character of an a a within which a project is 1rcated that would cause the appru�ad projectt to oecome inconsistent or non - conforming. Thus;- -;;the foflloraing findings must be met to approve the requested time'artension: 1. That the proposed use is in accordance witn th¢= General Plan, objectives of the Development Code, 'and the „purposes of the ditia Oct in which tnr�si'te is located. ` 2. That the p noosed use together witn the conditions applicable thereto, will -lot be detrimental to the puolic health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity” 3. That tree proposed use complies with each of the appiicaole provisions of the Development CMe. IV. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommt9ed that the Planning Commission continue » s tem for 30 -45 ways and direct the church to clear their vacant land of all weeds and debris and re -seed it with a drought - resistant seed (such as Southwest Mix #8051). - R tfully .t aui r City Pla ner BB:GG:sgr Attachments: Letter from applicant dated November 24, 1985 Exhibit "A" - Staff Report for Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -21 Alta Loma Christian Church dated November 28, 1984 Exhibit "B" - Location flap Exhibit "C" - Ma, ";ter Site Plan Exhibit "0" Elevations LOMA t QAVO L M&CI ARY MWgTi November 24, 1986 CHURCH � 1 03M EAPPHORE ALTA LOMA, CAL! a1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division''' 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 CUP No. 84 -21 Resoi .No. 84-135 Exp. Date: 11/28/86 Subject: Extension of existing Conditional Use Permit, CUP 84 -21 Gentlemen, On November 28, 1984, the Alta Loma Christian Church was issued a Conditional Use Permit, CUP, for the temporary conversion of a single family residence into a church office. The residence in question is owned by-;`he church and is located in the southeast corner of the churl ,p• operty. Refer to the attached information for a copy of the site plan and a list of conditions.7,i the original permit. Also, the church Vembership and employees have attempted to comply with all the CUP conditions, and to the best of my knowledge non+ have been violated. For the past two years, this i,esidence has been used as a church office and it has not resulted icy any problems with the neighbors or the community. However, the growth of the church has been much slower than what was originally expected. Because of this slow growth period which we have experienced, the church is formally requesting a two year exaension of our Conditional Use Permit. Respectively subm tted, C)4 John Graham President Alta Loma Christian Church JG/mz RECEIVED Cn ! OF WKNO CUMWDNfiA Enclosure PLANN "'(' )`VON ?a NOV 2 51986 PM A nandw=kvdoaW altowship wham only dm Bibis is t nor CITY OF RANCHO CUC,.uYIONGA � ICn k STAFF REPORT GATE: November 1984 1937 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission ( k FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N6.' 84 -21 - ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH - A request to convert an existing ,868 square Toot single family residence into an office for the Alta Loma Christian Church on .25 acres of land the Very Low u Residential District, located. at the west side of Sapphire Street, across from Orange Street - APN 1062- 332 -23. r t I. PRG'JECT AND S_ ITEE OtS-CRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Convert single family residence into a church office. B. Pur2osz: Provide administrative office facilities for Alta Loma Christian Church. C. Location: 6390 Sapphire D. Parcel Size: ,25 acres (10,890 sq. ft.) E. Existing Zoning: Very Low Residential F. Existing Land Use,? SinSle Family Residential' - ii G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: ort Institional nay church , Very Low Residential South - Single Family Residential, Low Residential East - Single Family Residential, Low Residential West - Institutional (church), Very Low Residential H. General Plan Design ations: nations: p rect Site - ow gRe- siden tial (2-4 du /ac) North - Low Residential (2 -4 du/ac) South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) West - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) FLANNING COi4PlISS1nN STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -21 - Alta i Christi4 !Church November 14, 1984 Page 2 i 101 I.: Site Ch-irag eri-stics: The subject property is a rectangular shaped ;o� //. his property is basically surrounded by the adjacent 6'hurch'property. J. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code permits church 'Office aci it eis withn the Vq% Low Residential district subject to a Conditional Use Permit: In addition, no structure originally designed as a residence shall be used for an a ;fire use unless the building and site are improved to meet all code requirements for an office development. II. ANALYSIS• A. Back rou-d: On October 10, 106, the Planning Commission continued Conditional Use Permit 84 -21 to give the applicant ample tine to revise plans;,indicating the relationship between the proposed use and the Masser Plan 4f he Alta Loma Christian Church. On November 14, 1984 a Plaster Plan of the Oita loisa .nf stun Church, incorporating the conversion" of th (f' subject single family residence into a church office„ was )resented to the Commission. The Planning Commission continueb,,Conditioval Use Permit No. 84 -21 and instructed staff to draft- �.resnlution for approval cv ;—zideratian. B. General: The attached resolution reflects the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -21 with conditions of approval. These conditions address the following: 1. Conditional Use Permit Time Limit 2. Hours of - Operation Restrictions 3. Signage Requirements 4. Occupancy Limitation S. Landscaping 6. Use Limitations 7. Lighting Impacts 8. 3uilding :Code Requirements 9. Grading Reclyirements C. Environmental Assesment:_ The proposed project has been determined to --Fe categorically exempt from tho provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Sectio 15301, Class 1) in which the conversion of a single family to an office use will not have a significant environmental impact. PLAN RING C0M,4 SSI0N Si'ArF REPORT CUP 84 -21 - Alta I Christian Church November 14, 198 11 Page III. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon previous Planning Commission J(, irect oo' n, Tt - s. reoomm4nded that the Commission review the attached resolution to rz`sermine'the project eonsistenty with the General Plan. Should the Commission support the findings and conditions 00, approval, adoption of thy- attached Resolution would be appropriate. SpeCf 5t1�}mltt2$, c' R r City Planner Attachments: Lester from,Appiieaut ;xhihit "All - Master Site Plan Exl'isit "B" - Floor Place Exhibit "C" » Elevations Resolution S 4 RESOLUTION NO. 83 -55 A RESOLUTIONIOF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CO bITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83 -04 FOR THE ALTA LOMA CHRfSiI N CHURCA LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE, OF SAPPHIRE STREET, B'zTWEER ORANGE STREET AND LEMON AVENUE IN THE R -1 'I';g)MZONE WHEREAS, on the 15th' "day of March, 1983, a complete application was filed by The Alta Loma Christian. Church for review of the above- described project; >and WHEREAS, on,",-the 27th day of April, 1983, the Rancfto Cucamonga � 7 Ploject. anning- Commission held a pitblio hearing .to consider the above- described E' pr NOW, THEREFORE, the F.ancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: " SECTION 1 the folowing findings can be met- 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes�of the zone in.which the "Use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will. not �he detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use wit f comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning:Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declarati�,,n is issued q+t April 27, 1983. r SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit; No. 83 -04 is approved subject to the fo owing conditionsi PLW,VNING DIVISION, 1. That the existing co - _.:ce block wall (which lies adjacent to single fa(.Xiy dwellings to the south) be increased in height 18 inches in order to provide sound attenuation and buffering or a, new wall cor,:;tructed to achieve the same purpose..' In addition, this sail shall be extended to the westerly property line. Resolution No. 83 -55 Page 2 r� 2. That the existing thrae -foot higK' l conrrete block K wall, ;=,,which traverses the norther -.y and westerly wr' propertV boundary, be increased in height ;to �;aix feet to buffer surrounding single family refA ences.. ` 3 Thpt a '10 foot dense landscape buffer be provided adjacent to single family "residences to the north, south, and west (parking areas included). Details and phases shall, be shown on detailed landscape plans. ` l 4. All laws and regulations of the'State Department of 'Social Services relating to licensing of- children's ti (education) day care = facilities shall be complied with prior to opening of the school.. 5. If the operation of this "school causes adverse effects upon adjacent properties, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for their consideration and possible termination of such uses. )p 6. Operation of the school shall not p oommeYice until such timr_1•s all Uniform Building bode and Title 19 of the State Fire Marshall's `Regulations have been complied with. Plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. 7. All supervised outdoor preschool activity will be limited to the hours of 10:30 a.m. to 11:45 a.m., and 4:00 p.m'. to 5:00 p.m. daily. i. 8. Expansion of the pre ;chool beyond 80 students will require the approval of a modified conditional use permit. 9. Preschool play structures shall be setback 20 feet from. adjacent single family parcels. 10. All proposed and future structures shall be limited to one story in height. 11. The master pian for the entire site is approved in concept only. Precise design and site plan review will be required for all proposed future phases. l� �. �xd Resolution No. 83-55 Page 3 12. The street improvements along Sapphire Street shall include grading and street paving with an asphalt berm along the adjacent property to the south as necessary for drainage _ and protection of the neighboring property. APPROVER AND ADOP,0 THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 1983, PLANNINC�OMMISSIO CITYE" At WO CUCAMONGA BY• a e rman - •Secretary jw/ASE$ � e of t e P annmg omn"fission` I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was, duly and i t regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular mea :n; of the Planning Commissiop held on the 27th day of April, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit, AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, STOUTS BARKER, JUAREZ, REMPEL NOES. COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE f) l RESOLUTION NO. `j A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONaaA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION _FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -21 WHEREAS, a request has bee. °filed for a time extension for the above- described project, pursuant to Section 17.02.100; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described Conditional Use Permit 84-21. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made Ghe - following A,,,,- ,That prevailing economic conditions have caused " :distressed market climate for development of th'c project. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. C. That strict:enf6cement of the conditions of approva'! regarding expirations would not be consistent witf�l the intent of the Development Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the,,4blic health, safety, or welfare, or materially injoriclus to properties or improvements i.-. the vicinity, SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time exten .on orc Project Applicant Expiration - Conditional Use Permit 84 -21 Alta Loma November 28, 1987 Christian Church APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: T. David BarRer, Cnairman Ai" EST: brad Buller, Deputy Secretary NEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, CUP 84-21 - ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH �a March 25, 1987 Page OWL I Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning_ Commission of the City of Rancho,= Cucamonga, & herebyy certify that theL forega ng Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the P1�anning Commission held an the 25 day of March, 1987, by the fot: wing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSXONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Gc��ral, MEMORANDUM c o DATE: tii,xch 20, 1987 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the'Planning, Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner ,,OBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESCtENT AND TENTATIVE TP:ACT 13279 - WILL LYO(ti COMPANYN,, The staff report for the above item will be delivered to the Pla7ning Commission on Monday, March 23. The report. has been delayed due to unresolved issues with the school district. `s BB /jr ITEM K 0 EM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT Q I} i "z . . DATE: Mardi 25, 1987 u 1977 ; TO: Chairman and Members "o the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Wf,s an, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 87 -02 - DECKK J OEVEJUPME reques to reduce r number of par a n si=s required, the side yard setback area, and the front yard, ,setback and to exceed the height limitation for a proposed 11,000 square foot office building at 9113 Foothill Boulevard in an Office Professional district located on the south side 'bf Foothill Boulevard west of Heilman Avenue and east'of Vineyard Avenue. Tree Removal Permit 8721 requesting the removal of 3 mature Chestnut trees, 4 Uquidambars & 4 Modesto Ash trees - APN 208241 - 09. RELATED FILE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-46 i 1. BACKBRO11,40: The applicant is requesting the variances in the of l oael areas: A. Parking j B. 'Side Yard Setback C. Front Yard Setback D. Building Height II. ANALYSISz A. Parking: The applicant is requesting a reduction in the number o. par -Ing spaces required. Tne number of spaces required by the Development Code is 41 at a ratio of 1 space per 250 sq. ft. based on 10,160 sq -.ft. of gross building area. The number of spaces provided in the proposal is 36, thereby creating a net deficiency of five (5) parking spaces. The applicant's request is based upon a provision in the Industrial Specific Plan that allows parking to be calculated based upon net floor area by deducting electricallmecnanical rooms, elevator shafts, stairwells and multi -story lobbies. This provision was added to the ISP in response to the larger office buildings along Haven Avenue. Staff feels that parking is critical on smaller buildings on individual small parcels. ITEM L L—A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 87 -02 -� DECKK March 25, 1987 Page 2 t B. Side Yard Setback: The applicant is requesting a variance from e -required building and parking setbacks from the west property line. Ad`acent to residential districts 4 10 foot parking setback and 1 20 foot building setback, are required. The project proposes a 3 foot parking setback and la foot t building setback (see Exhibit "B "). The intent of the Development Code was to provide adequate spatial buffering between a higher intensity use, such as office, and residential areas. T, nearest apartment units to the s% west are approximatelr 85 feet from the -proposed office building. Further, the office .buildina and parkins, is adjoining the Pepperwood Apartment carports and unenclosed parking areas (see Exhibit "D"). C. Front Yard Setback: The applicant is requesting a reduction in e Tequi re a -55-Ming akid streetscape setbacks along Foothill Boulevard. Foothill Boulevard Interim Pulicy t­2 require a 45 foot minimum building aqd a 45 foot avei!age streetscape landscaping setback,. A 31 foot building setback and 40.25 foot average landscaping setback are proposed (see Exhibit "B "). The site plan design is based upon' a provision in the Deveiopment Code for existing lots of record with less than 175 feet in depth which does not apply to Foothill Boulevard. The subject parcel is 163.50 feet in depth. The Foothill Boulevard- Interim Policy E -2 requires a 45 foot setback "regardless of'' parcel depth ". D. Building Height. The applicant is requesting to exceed the maximum ouilding height.. in. the Office Professional District, the Oevglopment Code limits the height of any bu;tding within 100 feet of a residential district to 25 feet. The project as proposed has a proposed height of 29 feet. The surrounding apartment buildings are all 2 stories with similar building. height (see Exhibit "C "). The Development Code would otherwise normally allow a 40 foot building height. II. FACTORS FOR CONSIDERATION: The purpose and intent of a Variance is to provi a ex it�rom the strict application of'. ,felopment standards when special circumstances pertaining to tho gperty such as size, shape, topography or location deprive such.,. `erty of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity ant.,_ jithe same district inconsistent with the objectives of the Develor.Aent Code. In reviewing individual cases for Variance, the fallowing criteria must be considered: 1. Special Circumstances A. is the property unique with respect to size, shape, 'topography or locat'on? L—A ` ` ' 11 - PLANNIkG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT � VARIANCE 87-02 _oECKK' � March 2=, 198' ` = � , Bi Are there ..e'xceptional or extraordinary circumstances appl I cable to the property or proposed use that do not ' apply generally to other properties in the same aunwr 2. Preservaiion or Property Right (Hardship) A. Can reasonable uow. be'- do of property without this Variance! , ` � Without this the applicant denied privileges "^ in,the same zone? ' C. or cremtedby the physical hs'tr-- - the site? 3. Damage to Others � A. Will the Variance he detrimental to the public health, safety or we/rare? ' B. Will this be ege i the limitations on other properties in is "the same zone, ' III, , l. The project site is unique ' development Development Residential and built as apartments, wh.:%,reas tht I-oject site is zoned Off ice/Professional. The site wAs redesiglated to Office/Professional because it was too smaY to be developed as apartments. -The site is also of legal non-conforming dimensions. It is 168 feet wide versus 200�, feet required by' Code, a 32 foot Oeficiency. It is 163.5 fes_�, deep versus 17F feet required, an 11.5 foot deficiency. As a resul t o'T' stAbstandard lot dimensions, the parcel size is also non- conforming. The subject parcel Is 27,468 sq. ft. in area, whereas, the in the Office/Professional District, Because of the surrounding existing 4evelopment. there is no opportunity to combine lut~ i: order to meet the lot dimensions required by the Code. ?here are no unique topographical or shape coridttxmms. � 2. The Variance izquest is the result of a combination of factors: building siza and location, parcel size, and surrounding zoning and land use. The location of the building is dictated by the size and shape of the parcel -- absent the ��/ _3 � . ��� ` PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 87 -02 - DECKK March 25 1987 ` Page 4 use of a parking structure, which "would be7-cost- prchibitive for this size building',. To the extent that the applicant chose to develop a parcel which 4% substandard in size, the Variance request is self -imP sed. ` Reasonable use could be made of the property without variances for certain uses. The site was formerly, used as a preschool facility. Other types of uses would _require smaller building Y area and fever parking spaces, such as a service station or - .- estaurant. The applicant could buili,,:an 8,180 sq. ft. office- or retail buildit'g; therefore, withgpt this variance t,e appicantt would not be denied priviiegals enjoyed by owneF of other properties in the same zone. t1s 3. The applicants has based his request for the parking vartf-Ace on standards which 7tre applicable only in the Industrial ;'pecific Plan area. Although 'thc LISP allows for certain deductions for= multi -story 1'otbies, a &zirwel is, elevator shafts, and mechanical equipment, rooms, the Development Code does Wit ai1ow for these deduction` in the Office/Professional District and requires parking to be based on gross floor area T'K,refore, staff cannot support this as justification for a parking variance. The granting of this Variance on this basis wogd'be a special privilege inconsistent with limitations on ether `l\ properties in the Office/Professional District, ` IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Before granting a. Variance, the Plannfliq mum -al. of the following required Findings: That strict or literal interpretatian and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship incensisteno with the objectives of this Code; 8. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved, or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone; C. That strict or literal inte.:pretaticn and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone; D. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation on other properties clsoz ^ifl,ed in the same zone; E. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. L- Pl4T O Si'AFF REPORT VARJAk ZY- t EC1CK March 25,,187 �7- Page 5 V. CORR €SAORDEMCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing in a aTy R naft. newspaper and all property owners within 300 -= fe fie sm. site have been notified. In Odition, Public 11 Hearing n Fes have been posted on the subject property. U, RECO? Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny e ar artqq. request. If the Coissian concurs; Staff std� pld be directed td pare a Resolution of Ce9ial for adoption on tr next Consent Calendar Agenda. If the Commission feels that i.he reggJred findings can be made, staff- should be directed to prepare a Resolution of App' )vai with findings for adoption on the next Consent Calendar oenda. Ras f tlly s tted, 1 l Bra Bul r City Pi ner BB:CW:ns - Attachments: Letter of Justification Exhibit- "A" - Loc4tion Map Exhibit "B" - Si,ce Plan Exhibit "C" - StreetscapelSections ' E Exhibilt "D" Side Yard Setbacks I I i �L. i L-.."' G tephen Daniels 111. commercial broke;ag January 28, 1987 CHRIS T'TESTMAN CITY 01"� RANCHC CUCAMONGA PLANNING DEPT. 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Chris, The site plan far the Foothill Professional Center h" been ! redesigned per staff's input, and now requires only two minor variauces instead of the six we originally proposed. Below are listed the items for your consideration: 1) Building Neighk The maximum height for this zone is 25' and we a'- proposing a building height of 290. The 25' heirt requirement comes into play because the lZity's 0 Ae regarding projects ad,;acent to residential property. In this case we are surrounded on three sides by two -story apartment buildings. We from on ?Oothill Blvd. and wish to build a two -story office build�,Ag of =,4� lar height to the apartments. I Simply stated, the overall height for an office building j with 9' floor to ceiling heights, 13' floor to floor heig -"s,, and sloping roofs which screens roof top mechanical equipment, cannot be accomplished within the 25' height restriction. Thirteen feet per floor plus three feet for HVAC screening gives us a building height ai 291ft. 2) Parking Requirements We are asking for a parking variance on this project that will meet present office building standard,, currently provided witt-4n Subarea 7, the Havers Overlay District. As you know that area is in the heart of the new Rancho Cucamonga and will have the most intense office building uses in the City. Parking will be calculated on a net building area deducting !our malt-!-story lobby, stair well and the methanicaljeldetrical room from the gross building area. p 8331 UTICAAVENUE 3UITE204 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA4lFORMA 91730 714/980 -6868 C,hiis "Westman City of Ranch'3" Ci�cwaonga January 20, 1987"' Paga 2 There is NO CHANCE that any of the areas deducted for in the Overall square fOOta9ft will EVER be used as�,office, space,,,th*refore creating a demand for moic parking. ' " I DAon Corporation prcvided the City wiz�t a parking study that verified the go"i,h4lity of� deducting those areas oniy and the City bos awopLid that study and implemented the Haven Corridor .54,andards. The,area surrounding Vt,2 Foothill Professional Center is fully.,Jeva,lopw�360 degrees 41-ound the sit*. We will not have &f-y other neighbiuring propertleit crooting parking problems that coald be dotrIzental to this sit��. We respectfully requ"t tiat you analyze. ourj�r030ct in total and hope that you will so, we have developsd�aA exceilent product that all of us can be prou4 Si -e,z!qly, 1� Da. -;; W. chards rtner Dec�;-,�' Dev,elopme :§�ppany ?y� r SAN SERNARJIMQ ROAD y ty icam lAcl�. t aKO�is o!r<TER _' v9 ✓� `y l w1PEs w 2 p /AC CDM ME CIA NR Z > COMMER IALACAN� I It _V�.. II �' V A 7 L4MI 9Y JRCA 8 lAE F30THILL RI M F jtI D&\, DISTa 6*� C. .Z 1 W - (1 .. Q. \ AFART1AtMS pDO. MARTYlttT9. TOWN NRdl3 HED HIGH AEs EV. RWAC 94- 240U /AC D EY. ISTs M i 1111 t.Ow Res ' 2- 4VIVAC PROPOSM 944 COHDOMIRRMS 4! S� y' MED t- 14011IAC. LLI >Sa V V NORTH 1 CITY OF iTC.`!. RANCHO CUCAMONGA - TITiX. PLANNING DIVISON F-XHit3 T,- ..A- SCALE: _. NLMJLAFVAM i i� a `eie:a�.cter mw'*)�M woe urawAS�r -� •—i - 2 V=vw b ' LIM } k R I La a \ jj 1 o + i 1 1 b 1 t� 11YM91!!�.QR111Q 1 1 T7lW�lOR7411 1 r Woo ` i �I VHO CLOki-VIONGA ,E; /m PLANNING DIVISION eery (WIG) tip 4 Q� b 'A5W t NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN110, •GA =C.E= -SOE W D 5 �� -,-15; PLANNING DIVISION EXH«-rr --L, -2 — cc: Lys f Clrf OF RXN, CHO CJCAMONGA, cv� Ago STAFF REPORT,; d ^J DATE: March 23, 1987 1977 i TO: Chairman and Members � the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye a:'Hanson, Se Aor Civil Engineer ,BY Joe Stofa, Jr., Assa date Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASS£ NT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL. MAP 10393 - Keith Company su v S on of 79.z acres of land into 33 Farce "is a t e _ n ustriai Park q strict {Subarea 16 }, located at the northwest corner of Archibald, 0enue and Fourth St r eet - APH 210. 062 -13, 11, 02, 26, 33, 32. (Rereted file DR 86 -37) The applicant is requesting a continuance for Parcel Map 10393 to the regular Planning Cowission meeting on April 8, 1987 for the reasons as stated in the attached letter (Exhibit A). RECOMMEK'Z"&TT ON Staff recommends continuing th!s item to the April 8, b87 regular Planning Commission meeting. Respectfully s0mi ttcd, i Barrye R. Hanson 1 Senior Civil Engineer BH. :JS :dlrt + Attachments: Letter (Exhibit "A") T J I E h E .` T. F C 0 A&1 P A' ti i E 5 :? mrngrg •Cllu�gtr».q•Hug•.ir;haYA rr t.HHAxurpr•iri lr+Na•rurt *•IrY :.d +wa;r rh.r. N,,•.aamrN!6rn march 19, 1987 �M S Ms: Nancy Fong Asse =i.ate Planner :. Community Develdprr.3nt Department ' City of Rancho evcamonga f° P.O. Box 8071 Rancho Cucamonga; California 91!30 RE: DR86 -37 Corne: pointe Master Plan parcel Map 103 -93 �+ Dear Ms. Vongs ©a behalf of :my. client. Vha Lusk f CompAties, we request a continuance of bur Planning Commission meeting scheduled for March 25, 1987 to April 8, 1987,` in order to allow us ' to further study the design issues brought to our attention in the :resign Review. (' Ihank you. ,% Sincer_e1�, Robert unnin am Director of L dsca 'Architecture > W$ H: H4 "S!L•i'A.G11SfH.SICSH.C:•1 ?142G t"ti 4i �4e•PdUO+,�y.1iA +, l N4lE It lr r rl.•, Inl •Iv A IVII)WAt C:i 9,1 S1IIM154 ".+•1744 &.t.� _�+tanJ�! »3CK•sr lWav Ifur /,inJC.++Nr tYrAr.ir" HHr»trM. to v_'tl't'77rr >Y > -tl +'+ . r 1 CITY OF li_4NCHO CUCAM0_P4Gt1 c ^pro F STAFF REPORT �v�° c ? iii Ing F. aiz JATEt Alarch 25,< 1987 TO. Chairman and Members of tpe Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Plagr>rt, BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL � SESSMEN'1' AND DEVELOPMZNT ; REVIEW 86 -46 - DECKK —01rV t propasa o cons rucT -aan 31000 square o0 0 ice building at 911 ?'r3otniil Boulevard in the Office/Professional District located on the south side of Footnill Boulevard, west of Hellman Avenue and 'east of Vineyard Avenue - APR! 208241 -09. Associated with this ?ropusal is Tree Removal Permit 87 -21 requesting the remoV,l of two (2)` mature Chestnut trees, 4 Liqui&mbar trees, and 4 Modesto Ash trees. RELATED FILE VARIANCE 87 -02 I. PROJECT AND SITE, iDESCRIPTION A. Surrounding land Use and Zoning: ar - e af en er, Gen—er—aT Commercial South - Apartments, Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) East - Apartments, Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) West - Apartni- -.its, Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) B. General Plan Designations: ?rolec e - ice ro essional North - General Commercial South Medium -H.gn East - Medi Lm-Hi gh West Medium -High C. Site Characte:-istirs. The project site is approximately .6 acres. -re is a:'vacant residential structure and .eleven tr:ature trees located on the site. Through close coopei^,ation rrith the Historical Co:mtissl ,)n, the applicant has located'a recipient for the hcJse who has agreed to move it to another location w'thin the city linits. This structure is being considered for historic landmark designation u,--)n relocation. ITEM N PLANNING COMMISSION StAFF REPORT DR 86 -46 - DECKK.OEVELOPME;NT - March 25, 1987 , Page 2 There is an existing parking lot with spaces for roughly 16 cars. The pad elevation of the house is 2 -3' higher than- F�othili Boulevard. Street tieer and sidewalks were installed . through a previous CCnditional Use Permit, D. Parking Calculations; Number of lumber of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Foota a Ratio Required_ 9rovided Office 16,160 tf250 41 36 The deficiency in the number of parking spaces provided is addressed in a separate report for Variance 87 -02 on this agenda. II. ANALYSIS: ; A. Background: On December 10 1986 this project was reviewed by e man ng Commission for consistency with the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies., The,.­ Comaission wade a` positive determination and the project waI 'sent , back is staff .� begin the formal review procedings. ,As part` °of the site design it was necessary to apply for multiple variances which have been processed under a separate file (Variance 87 -02). B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Sutann�,.C'Mtiea, Ldrry c I-eT-a-fid-Brad 99 er reviewed the design on M&C"t 5, 1987 and made the following recommendations: ,I 1. Though the Committee discussed the number, of parking spaces required in rei €tien to the overall site design of tyre proje# it was recommended. that the parking .Variance and''Zer Variance issues be discussed by the. full ,Planning Commissioe. (See rela`'ed staff report for Variance 87 -02.) 2. The applicant stated that he agreed tr ..mpiy with staff recommendations of relocating the transformer and the requirement of 36 -inet„ box specimen size trees along Foothill Boulevard. 3. The Committee was copcerned that tha, proposed building colors do not provida compatibility to the surrouhding e;:(sting build')'ngs, and recwmaeno t�:at the color palette be charge to more earth tone. A color schem:.v should be submitted to t" City Planner for review an+u app, offal . AT- a result, the applicant hcs s�jbmitted a new color scheme as shown in the colored renderings that will be aaailabze at this meeting. PLANNING C ►+ISSION OFF REPORT OR 86 -46 - DECKK DCVELOPMENT i. March 25 1587 ' �. Page 3 a 4. 'The Committee conceptually approved the site design and h architecture precluding the need for variances. " C. Environmental Assessmo -ot: Upon completion of Part I and Part o e ntt�a u , staff has found aeverse environmental impacts relating specifically to the ciiisting residential structure on the project, site. However, the structure is being relocated for, Mistoric preservation. In addition, the project would re ,wire the removal of ten (10) of the eleven (11) heritage ees that are protected by the Tree Preservation O,dinance;, The that removal permit was not, discussed at Design ReKiea Cd ttee. An arborist report on the 'health of the trees was ' Rot prepared by *,ale appl i cant. Pursuant tv' the x requirr7*.nts of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, relocation of these trees is preferable; therefore Condition No. 1 would requir e. relocation or replacement if 'relocation is not 1 :%I. FAGfS FOR FINDINGS: The !proposed use is consistent with the ma ow ene an. ever, the project has been determined to be not consistent with the Development Code and Foothill Boulevard Corridor Interim Policies as, described in the staff report for [ Variance 87 -02. r IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommenL Denial of Development Review 86-46. How eirer, if the Planning G0mQ1ss1Qn can ma e a —t e required findings for Variance 8742 and can support the removal of the heritage trees, then approval may be granted through adoption of the attached resolution "} and issuance of a Negative Declaration. If the Commissior:'cannot support the Variance and /or tree removal requests, then sta s culd be directed to prerare a Resolution of Denial for adoption on the next Consent Calendar agenda. Respe fully sub�aitted- r - (Brad Bull r City Planner BB :CW:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A` - Site Utilization Map Exhibit *B" Site Plata Exhibit "C° - Elevations Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Resolution of Approval with C&,ditions F _ dt Ul � 3M7371Y HYMli31{ :no 4" < Y9 o z_ cc /� ��� Nr m,. all Ir tit IV F ' RESOLUTION NEB. A R&S .UTION OF THE, . C Q CUCANtONC i PL IHG COMMISSION 'a APPROVING, DEVELOPMENT MW NO. 86 -, OCATEt� AT 9113 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE OFFICEMIZ&b,�,IONAL D=STRICT WHEREAS, on the 9th day of,4 Harch, ' 1187, a ceTplete;,appiication was filed,by Deckk Development for review of 'the move- described project; and 'WHEREAS_, on the 25th day-, Gf Barth, 1487, the 'gancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hold a meeting to consider the above - desuribed project. NOW, THEREFOR:, oe- 1,RAncho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as f -3Y',rws: 'i SECTIOP -1: That the fol'-Owiiiq can be met. I. that the ;proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General _PIan; and 2. That the Qroposed use is In accord with the objective of the Development Co.h and the purposes of the district in which the s•'. &- is located; ant! 3. That the proposed use is in compiitknce with each of the° applicable provisions of the (�jvelopment Code. and �� t ` 4. That the proposed use, together wfth the conditions applicable thereto, will not bo. 0e rimental to the public health, r a , /, or- we fardj „or materially injurious to s'o !ties or impr, ,cents in the vicinity. SECTION 2; That this project ►nil l- not create adverse imps -cts oar the enviruivnen an at a Negative DeclirWon is issued on March 25, 19x7,_ SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 86 -46 is approved subject to the follo w� g'co`%n itions and attachecr Standard Conditions: "'ARMING 1. That Tree Rernayal Permit 87 -21 is hereby approved subject to the foflowi,•ig'. F 0701 --02 0 3-25-87 PC Agenda 5 Resolution No. DR 86 -46 - gECKK March 25, 1437 Page 2 a. The City Planner snall cause to be prepared, at the applicant's expense, a report by a qualified arburist regarding the health and condition of the trees and the potential for relocating the trees on- or eff- site. The aroorist's report shall be completed prior to tha issuance of any grading or building per its and prior to the removal of the trees. b. If the trees cannot be relocated on- or off - site, they,, -, shall be replaced on a one -for -one basis With the ' largest nursery grown trees available as determined by the City Planner pursuant to Municipal Code Section 19.08.100. Replacement trees shall be indicated on the detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be rLyiewed and > approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. t c. The existing Chestnut tree in the northeast corner of the site shall be preserved and enclosed by an appropriate Construction barrier sucil as chain link fence, prior to the issuance of any grading or huil4in3 permit. further, any.. existing -,trees tra& ti '# anted on -site ", shall also be protected by an a�prb i4r iate construction" barrier.. Ail other requirements of Municipal Code Section 19.08.110 shall 2. That 10;a o• the required number of trees for the project ,hall be: of 36" box multi- trunked or larger and planted along x {,F4 foothill Boulevard frontage. 3. :Landscape and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved by Cal Trans and the City Planner prior to issuance of.building permits. 4. Where applicable, ,ali requirements of the . Historic Preservation Ordina ;,ce, Chapter 2.24 of the Municipal. Code, shall be ct.46plied with regarding the removal, relocation, alteration or demolition of the existing house. 5. Approval of Development Review No. 86 -46 is granted subject to the approval of Variance No. 81 -02. ENGINEERING 1. The drive approach shall be reconstructed.perpendicular to Foothill Boulevard and centered on the drive aisle as approved by Cal Trans and the City Engineer. ANIL Res01 uti06 No. OR 86 -46 - DFCKK . March 25, 1987 Page, 3 a j APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF-MARCH, 1987, PLANNING;- ,OMMISSION OF THE -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: rr 3 av ar er, a man '. ATTEST: Ura u er, epP49 ecres ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of ithd "'�City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Wig dujay and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning CQM. isW �of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comi- S`sion held on theJP6th day of March, 1987, by the`•fcilowincq.vote -to -wit: AYES: C"ISSIONERS• l NOES: COMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i i —/0 Yr OC'L. Lu> ��+ w -V G.A n pA 72_14 m wa O �Pas-1 �. ,. p=w 6O �ZC rmimNP �M s��O!g vYYi at <Ua � <a c.�L"uuYA'9"w wu�y3 z y1 Aa °c��q Oaf �acY °� OIL G.�LL a C< AY 1 yG -0 +� ♦+ o,..r �m� ®%�aui go'.oy N -rte _i$E��. 4 O _ Y d 4=ny9 v. O VT M m U' w L C y <(/ uz;ti u 6V Z Y L O w G,pr Y r 4L M j q'4C 9 �}4 W. gV,�A dl,iL Y�j 4O •S. d VTS�ir Y Y ocs «y �: �.bMN c�u •,. c agAU =a�i' (, §' d . p S N N O^^ Ek 4 °aCCeW a V K O m. °w ESN _ aps 4N VI� i µ° N Y J. C LY CY C p Y p 6 g A N a a �a.� > Y w w ° � 2- F paaYa ^O �n.A« 4e La'°' el; � ��p.p �:q _. Oy�.N ^OC A. c�rw y8 mH _551`: .. �s 4 VGym OA L � YY •EE. .T ° � � m wN G<O O G 'y �Y .f��C C LSM =�gC <l .6.MG ZG�a:N ac °u 2 u i "u M o «oa A,cwoo u a p W Y Q < N Y T G ' � S W ^`r 9Ly OcSm O O ~ A G•G GSN t;yy..^ �O zO r V�wt b p0 +imp byys O Z � Z C... a Y� � L L v. ® S `< O 6.L1p A L ....✓.q� u w of C <.. Cz u6q.Ep c LEy o ems N � -a 3 � � c � nu S YO U�iu u�aGi �u Y � N � `a= O f p NA C<. •wni NA NL = .� -. C A f/ E T.ba�1 bom °�7b�+o �ri.AU y" >i� ?> td,Rye•' q pffy.p �� C A A y.w U!'�"ppOY11 CR VL° u °L .°aN9 qq R. .y qqp,� F� °Cy �LAr a°1W � �w Mr iJ�QQ= w 44G dl U VL 6 1 ^ � Y6 Piy y g6 L Lo.3 4Nq yT A0a1 v'2ya L NyLyG L `h gONL gaze. �.G t'..C,A�R^iiW - 0. Ca+d �_ iarbNa Usj °yd _ hC�L Tu uy b Q N� QaC"�LaY.q pf?G Z ^O'O.p, O C A `• °L. 4 y O•N„ +rt . G w Una 'Z b7p O' t�L rNCy Y Cyyy6'O. a.NN �v a. # 94NN Nr ^r• �0 Ly CY U NL tlf`i Y^ Sµ ppw■ qOG • N! O L O w p r C M a W b pnf V i+ H N p�W N g 1CY -.°.. A.f tYyY CCVQO ` V V V bwN q�Oaf i:a «vim u.�'� g�.� n,�w a LTJ.�4E lV��3 Cd e.c A b iQ � » . $ 0. o°t 'pOGMbCC ~L� �w VrN6.Y+M"t 4TIfC gyp. 7gpx��a'w� C���y w�.. V�NbC� .p. •r.' xVT.N WdU-JC Nr ADO YL Lr q qupgpw'^N QY Wda 4O�'RK Ati bCy C'M^ `au'.$�d� tlZy1NrM d ~Ci!laVb ?i ISYN DVb�N +µ O°g'+� ° AC�°$CGyy u� K 4wa 5wai V 4 NMN NL 71 ZNda3 g 4MNNMw°f +p`G 1V��2 O C S L iyw MO. ¢ L C °C C q6 •TfC V C .p rii �� A bK •bur tb «L MLq �f �e� V 0.0 yaO N +�6 dQUq s w.yW A ^ a��. �q� W O b • �Fl+� eye Y e'N'�u. v•q+ o9w a° �°^fw t•yLL. ^c '^.Lit +::w ubi��9 -0L.U. u BE 6P q�� � +O 4...a =.ON apQ Y6 K^ �w S; •ypi QL. HyG4.od 7i pw O W2 CR+b. $1 A. Zi A 76 CAt w;3w01 LY.G.G v=iCUa '°R 'am A6 OIO ^G UC 'l� q °tt �M1• C^ �L�a dr OtC lRjz A� CAAT4O CLgq „. n+ i_°°. Q. NV ;.G p. =..1 CO� NrD NV y`GII1 ^.RL A �.Ns•iv- v -0T �qro,^ o'a °u S A2TZZa grn..pq dye coat; caaL a..r ova pt as va ~4 N O�y O.� V•°11 V�W twC K • Ni T... LL .e T=a v +4 =y V M.e OrLL IS a{� �yLj 41y 6 ONq °;tyO Y CA4 CQ gsj S�,ObI bL��dRI row °' »dw C C O'y�.y CnO.O�Y vq y ° arouo oo o yO�.C.•. r s i aVN L�.$y.Ld Cq t• A4 6 i 1 F N l f! Hsu abvb t as vaar� a q � 06 �� � W .w pT A G Q•W. -. ^.0+� �y N ��! y yG�pp aOq�ya p •'<6 c C C' C A NN C C Lq. 9V =0.� Ty �T �� NAM. ~ c Q1t •^. `V�p�pCM �. N6 ."N S bc Nb. a0 n` a e� CLzc O EOr« q F t L A O C OCC N O N^ OL 9 4a a- ,b N D4 aQq q b G c ybq N 4 ^ y L 6W • U AN a L L D Q a x N (� u q a • z LNdy. y u N a 6 Cam• D YCApyC b V e ya ot.L am Dnv sL g Na >_� ue DNNwm uco w oo =�o day G °n�Y� PA�� r .,.. _aL •n Q u'"t.L OIq i� 4 ^< GLp G�. v N L C. N T b A U .c AO' Cq. CY CN at Y .w+ NA u N qO C. . Ly �C�^ OdH OLD c y. °Y .D. A N 9 O L N ^ N O C^ Ny OD! O A G L• a N C �L qbC g b 0 R 7 U C Y t q G w� L n�MN y ND'•�N �., @. q.��•i CN�-1. C NCyY a,.^ yilt W�uGi. v� W�uA rD _ �1D a�ffFL V'.ON A�q.� y.D dLOOND•6N AY �i�j� A O�Q..N Ly ..C.L�~ O yy C E��Y qV LY �y a NdA OV 4 61�tD�nd90 D'` dD6^ q��NYC g=ga lL nNyLU UE�O 4� O •.. i4 O CC a 6 Nb C V N L 01LN UO� ACyi+. a O n G i3 1 V N $'L` O^ N. p Y. dL.4 yA Ww LVO q V'q 6 NN i Yr..O U - �eT T ba NN N d et C�.0 rryy Cf p� +yL �L R D L 6C NOD Lp+G aAS o- -- .- NY. T.6 is + y LN N C N •Ga N< N N^ ■ Y 4 N A N D yy /� N L LL < N V •2 pl A a A N Q O qG L I A +• @ _ < V L. O� G H l f! Hsu abvb t as vaar� a q � 06 �� � W .w pT A G Q•W. -. ^.0+� �y N ��! y yG�pp aOq�ya p •'<6 c C C' C A NN C C Lq. 9V =0.� Ty �T �� NAM. ~ c Q1t •^. `V�p�pCM q0. a�3 A.Q' Gq uyOp W ^0.� N p Y A O C OCC � U O N^ 9 • L Ory�ryV 6 � Ir K L. aGl ^DL G c A� N 4 ^ Nu. 6W • U ..D.� a�G V •• t � a43 660. �• dw.�Lpi O�� N�6 C CG L y rCO Q. LNdy. y u N a 6 Cam• D YCApyC b CaNq L 'N^Q M _� Ctiy .9N PA�� 0.do Cbw N AFL y.�b N OV oa..^. =Y . ya a .OY OyyD do v. N� a° L6�ia "' +•a<q y^�V�L `...b�qy at A .w+ NA u N D � t^ r > D9 ou^i C ^..... n,IL OLD c bC LO Y °Y .D. • o arpo Nt L OClYp.b a'D H. C.c5 � � g qa�.l �&� �L qbC p oC NN +^ •„qL Ol y D�b D tll aY y. ._ O >6p V y^ a n�MN y N.a°i L C Cl OISN O yy C O C O b Gb N N W.0 N O Nyr CE T Lw.2 9 UE�O G GL q Wq L' b y qy !, L D L UO� ACyi+. a O n G i3 1 _ y Aq� ^OL6U ba d e E < G iEt rT K q d Aq a� OLS • y Y Ot ELY. � 0. Op'jy •N.. C 1N C «LL O G Y Wa4 u ` ydC a d'zY pq �d _.'ff to 1L C « �� • I~: o. a «o ut••^'. T, 99 ocg�'O1 u yay C. J d o «zu cq ee L do.N si.N" Y'u t,Ynyt'` v -q L. J-% ` U ry obo p"iao6. !z- .•a YN qro Y« F c O a ` Hk Tbq� p yp�« �Ei qVN tl �1e. �LC�.'� 4O «•" !. ' °S Los N {t WM T �9 A Y YOB YO SC'GVd 9 J y NL y �'eLa ua Cp0 OyIZ T p Y o q y YY = S�ra WT YUb Guv Y pOY LL G W «(,q 4.rU AL E« Y q L1 Y � C O) L G C q � « °° S ^q� °' G � '•'t W d. C 0Y L 9 J .. - 4YyY y O r$ c Oq N ��e �•q S W a{ par Ot n^ U E� pG S � Y A m YWi.i � Y O« C�Ygy{ �a G ^L G+•.N nn�P .�9NU O. pU� y Npdi L'+- °0 � aN a ��yYy YHIpL t" C` F 4 Y 0 y' L O M. O Y TCCr O d p M;. q'4 Yq p U C q d Vutj� O Y S F G S Y C Y 11! yy., ty� pyp gZ yy q9q 56� �C ra �sq_Y O I'UWL YLi36Q1�N M p ypy 5�1'wG N N LYE S r I D N m S til T u p Ny a Ya-1n «u..YL. M LLya}« C L d 4 b S . n y � C b tZ- . 9 y 1 . C yyF C � .. AO ^GO 4gvG d OUN. �d0.n Y tl= D « � .es e- .Yp N L = OG Y i ,,. 2 a q t O L.L L> Z u °�� t;v �� v rdc N .. s`° n ep YC• d$s wcqd n`. gn eo� > = en gin n pNq ov ao.t. YmN g°.� @L LL.Y.v„i yi. V. qY Y L dSCY '9. ^La. y.«69 S2 S CL� G� X00« O qNq Yq p @yG bW. N { t ®"YLC 1 G�«O O - 0yJ O. « L 4 � C N L n 9 � N � « On E OL • « O DI 4L . p a t � d G Ot ' d ° C C = Y �•6+� t �« N . q Q y n a oS« - p 0 a Y d C V Y NN Y r- «ei 7Z &f c &Z �'G.G°.. c U mar K Mai a N H_ i vE.0 W�p E "U -=�YN r Ixa,a Y 9 ~�qgg r:o. ty+r'Ytl� ° oa� G �� v CL V. N` uie V a '• L Yb O Y .L•r0. ■°6 C.gLL cN'� «G v- a C.G. aY+Y yV •� L. �.� i qN �LL UCiy j NEO ''. N -t` Y qp Y a iM1i"•' / �L C N t•j l L of Y� ci 1' ° + 'O's, M tiPY`rr ~yu i A b ♦Yy a otl l). ai Y L° hY`L =�-P L ru QM p G L y Oy6 ..CGG a w itlVb �6 r e » e� WO IL 3rY = ✓pi IiYW�oY�r iY tl tl^ .r3 $ ^a g� ^��f Y « v H Ca NNYO �CYy YY4C y CY «� i i< b U 7y■ �C ybY aLFCr ` G.. 4 35 r C�. « O p L �cCY �C FN Nn YOi Cz V yNpQGy ~cLMy. N yy Y� = y o �i �9 �K �S6`� 6+ QY a OC �. rp fflY C. Up. �c Qt •• quP. A yi. p? 4 gg`` tR3 O. 3 Y K 5 y q CL ` IX E Y. C ��� a L C 4�E _ _ a wg� deE L °iGY C4Y G b�^ a.` p IL •• ,i CY=® M E C u jr Y a O 'i w,r� C L m. 0 p qa Y 7 p i g} rnatx tt a LA GYY NLQs± a �e '� .�iAStli t3E O 6 N yY ddw O~�4 Ypw. p . °. i t Uzz pw. L T V yL V� YPUr OQ _Eau "C0NL. Q IV M= E N O 4 Y�V NV.VN p. X' s R7N0 C Y Y .x a' NY pi NOY Vpd, � 14 14 x i d �l 'l �d �� i �Q d o °ar —TIp 4I Y V LL ✓ Iz Rp C Cy Wes! y 3 _ .02 �Ny K Q L! M Srre C1w Y Wr�Tj{ p O a V. 3Rx wN. C� Y YNr LL 1 C i I .iO ww fpru+ M 4 R p § !s Zia t 0. 4 L N N »uL b Y: 3N.1 egGi if � ripC4J C ai 4 4 ^fir L S6i »* .L" R L 4oi wpy A Vip_tt ^�� p y GY Mr.YJtliN upOrLLpV +i Awl Y A y yNq O a — zy i4 «np�Y 9 alt N� C'a L6M GZ a Y O »ry++ o 0. 4C0 C V d r �6� rY a 61 Y Y.L f�yyyyy �y .5.5 an c� .._. t fyiC eM `EC NQ QaEV �^w �L C i.i .iLL.'F4 .pox tz *YI V CULL4C �Mn rj» asr L.w >vY..'s <u % °�"•. w+:w�v. �e`t re �g �aa <w°, �. r L —TIp 4I Y V LL gg ✓ Iz Rp C Cy Wes! y 3 _ K Q L! ~¢ y4 C Wr�Tj{ G F V. 3Rx V C� Y YNr LL 1 C i I .iO ww fpru+ M u S !s Zia t 0. 4 L N N »uL ML 4 b Y: egGi if � +Ca A M C ai 4 C C! W Y L S6i »* .L" R L 4oi V — T/ �v~ ~• yy L p a =r C T� Y 'a9 4 °ter o pAM i(� N �dt vYi� 4 ` ". '✓^- »Z + t 6w Y u a co S N u 9itAyy a�a. y ✓`� oG.My u r*. O 311 C aw a n Q G V O 5v L !p »g V w v O Y O Y 0. A Y r �a M,e t N G R 'S 0 w Y :z M K M 1 j f4S w YY. A4 d Si `a!+ fH.i y. s� -\ F4L1 $�.. w a^ O �M 4YL tel: Cz N „L,A D. Cn'0.wG YT n' iiy �GG•sxVV u� ��� GNP yI {� � �! ,a.✓ " n N #yY{� C ^pw aII�j gar ^yN YYr'� .°. ^It: a,SN ayBw r .Ze^ xtl.".. G�5 K M O d4L v 6 G 0.a �w l Vuy T R� Y y�y�6 NUJ N RW N� .0 GIN _YM2 +Y N Y ^ W —TIp W 4i K Q Wr�Tj{ N.J i I --J >R u S t 0. b Y: vn *�- �V R�N V — T/ �v~ ~• yy L p a =r C T� Y 'a9 4 °ter o pAM i(� N �dt vYi� 4 ` ". '✓^- »Z + t 6w Y u a co S N u 9itAyy a�a. y ✓`� oG.My u r*. O 311 C aw a n Q G V O 5v L !p »g V w v O Y O Y 0. A Y r �a M,e t N G R 'S 0 w Y :z M K M 1 j f4S w YY. A4 d Si `a!+ fH.i y. s� -\ F4L1 $�.. w a^ O �M 4YL tel: Cz N „L,A D. Cn'0.wG YT n' iiy �GG•sxVV u� ��� GNP yI {� � �! ,a.✓ " n N #yY{� C ^pw aII�j gar ^yN YYr'� .°. ^It: a,SN ayBw r .Ze^ xtl.".. G�5 K M O d4L v 6 G 0.a �w l Vuy T R� Y y�y�6 NUJ N RW N� .0 GIN _YM2 +Y N Y ^ W r r O ~tee O_w HE V �6L " L ° � M V � � v � 0 0 Q l c Yv� 1V4 V LY� L � Y _a � r ds as Lam. L' Y O = L" 'M i W L ^ V O u ggam•' u � Y v �. o• V O =� p. � G f'.�_L ^' a�V VM " O C w •��� Wit= y Cw j C LC U y R 4 L L C lVi C Y. C C_ O w O Z a aG ov. S 4. u o." as a o� L _° L NH C u�.ya.�� cm °" 4r -�•� �^ a 'Y'S w°." y'u�= Dui 'nac ba` 1 Yom_ N ' 4 —tva xC IL ► r p S w �� 1 I f I NNJ'1 uw • N w O -- ---- -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ctcc_", S'' "F REPORT, a r 0 F U DATE: Wirch 25, 1987 1977 Zf TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner t. SUBJECT: MVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TEK.ATIVE TRACT 12279 - THE i1ILL11Wr YDR - _ AresIdential tra—c7t--s-O'division or acres $"lots to create planning areas for the future, development of the Vineyards North Village within the Victoria'Planned Community, generally located north of the touthern Pacific Railroad, south of Highland Avenue, west of the Daly Creek Channel, and ecst -v Milliken Avenue AP11: 271- 011 -01., 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, a'od 07; 227-081 - 01, 04, 081, G9, 10, and 11; 227- 091 -36. 1. PRNJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: i!f Tentative Tract 13279, the Approval " -5'f _masTer supgWf tentative tract for the Vittoria Vineya ds �= North, Vil I age. B. Purpose., To create blocks of land which are planning areas -can i if be further subdivided for single- family :ots. C. Surroundin Land Use and Zoning: acan Property u ure Foothill Freeway); Caryn Planned Comunity South - Vacant; Victoria Planned Community East - Ranch and Vacant Land; tow- Mediuu, Residential West - Homes under construction and Vai:ant Property (future Grows Villages); Victoria Planned Community D. General Plan Designations: ro ec Site »Yowl um esidential North - Low Residential South - Low - Medium, Residential Cast - Low - Medium Residential West - Lbw - Medium Residential and Medium -High Residential E. Site Characteristics: The site is ­a ­,at and contains no s� uctures or significant vegetation. The area slopes at approximately a 35 -4% grade frogs north to south. ITEM K A. General's The Tentative Tract is consistent ,;ra the Area De— veioppent Plan. A Condition of Approval of tho Area Developpent Plan was that a trail be shown on the west side of Rochester Avenue within an expanded parkway. The proposed street. 'section for Rochester Avenue shown with the Tentative Tract shows a 14' wide parkway with a 6' wide trail. A 4' land,,2ape easement is shown adjacent to the 14' wide parkway to efft_,tively create a minimum 18' parkway. The Design Review Committee con=-red that this design is consistent with the direction of the Planning Commission with their approval of the Ptea. Development Plan. B. )esi n Review Committee: With the initial review of this project before the De g Review Committee (Emerick, Tolstoy, Coleman) on February 19, 1987, staff expressed concern that the proposed design for Victoria Park Lane was not consistent with the design parameters of the Community Plan. In the design of the Victoria Planned Community, it was intended that Victoria Park Lane be a continuous open -space element ti% %t ties Victoria together. The Community Plan proposes a design concept for Victoria. Park Lane as a "road within a park ". The Design Review Committee concurred with staff's asseswiint that the original proposal for Victoria Park Lane with this project did K— PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RC5bRT TT 13279 - THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY March 25, 1987 Page 2 II. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission approved a conceptual Area Development Plan for the Vineyards North Village at their meeting of December 10, 1486 (see Exhibit "A "). This Area Development Plan establishes the planning areas, land -use densities, road alignmep,s, street sections, location of schoollpark _ sites, designation and location of a 5 -acre site for development as a community facility "site, _and , the master plan for trails for the Village. The Lyon Company's plan is to develop the Vineyards North Village as a 3 -step process. The first step is the "super block" tentative tract I e. Jentative Tract 13279, which implements the overall planning concept for the Vineyards North Village approved by the Area Development Plan by creating individual, super parcels out of Back of the planning areas, and dedicating road alignments for the arterial and collector roads. The second phase of development will be the trait subdivision of each of the super ( parcels. These tract subdivisions will subdivide each of the super parcels into individual parcels for unit development. The conceptual grading schemet internal road circulation, and trail alignment will also be established with the tract subdivision. The last phase of development will be Design Review of specific product for each of the individual tracts. III. ANALYSIS: A. General's The Tentative Tract is consistent ,;ra the Area De— veioppent Plan. A Condition of Approval of tho Area Developpent Plan was that a trail be shown on the west side of Rochester Avenue within an expanded parkway. The proposed street. 'section for Rochester Avenue shown with the Tentative Tract shows a 14' wide parkway with a 6' wide trail. A 4' land,,2ape easement is shown adjacent to the 14' wide parkway to efft_,tively create a minimum 18' parkway. The Design Review Committee con=-red that this design is consistent with the direction of the Planning Commission with their approval of the Ptea. Development Plan. B. )esi n Review Committee: With the initial review of this project before the De g Review Committee (Emerick, Tolstoy, Coleman) on February 19, 1987, staff expressed concern that the proposed design for Victoria Park Lane was not consistent with the design parameters of the Community Plan. In the design of the Victoria Planned Community, it was intended that Victoria Park Lane be a continuous open -space element ti% %t ties Victoria together. The Community Plan proposes a design concept for Victoria. Park Lane as a "road within a park ". The Design Review Committee concurred with staff's asseswiint that the original proposal for Victoria Park Lane with this project did K— PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13'179 THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY Ma.Fch 25, 1987 Page 3 not meet this design intent of the Community -'Plan. The Committee directed that the roadway alignment for Victoria Park Lane be redesigned to vary the median width to create a more "rural" appearance as was originally intended. With this change, the Committee recommended approval of this project subject to the following: (a) The completion of Victoria Park Lane (including landscaping and trails) is necessary to maintain the continuity and aesthetic value of the street, aiuj the development of that portion of Victoria Park Lane not within the project area is vital. (b) In order to maintain the natural, rural atmosphere intended, ' for Victoria 'Park Lane, no retaining walls should be buil`,within the right-of-way, In response to these concerns the following have been accomplished: (a) A revised roadway alignment for Victoria Park Lane has - been proposed that shows an unda ',.�'ting, varying width median that is consistent with the direction of the Resign Review Committee. (b) This project has been conditioned r-equiring full parkway improvements along the northern portion of Victoria Park Lane on that portion shown as outside the tract boundary (this is the proposed 40 acre hig% school site). (c) The projet has been conditioned prohibiting the use of any :ataining .walls within the right -of -way for Victoria Park Lane. C. East Entry Road: The Area Development Plan for the Vineyards North was originally reviewed by the full Planning Commission at a workshop on July 1, 1985. A primary issue at that time was the relationship between the Victoria Planned Community and the approximately 80 acres of land not under ownership to the William Lyon Company north and east of the Vineyards North Village. The Planning Commission "a direction was that these out parcels should be annexed into the Victoria Planned Community for planning purposes, and also to insure that development would be consistent with the design guidelines and standards of the Community Plan text. Consistent with thi goal, the Planning Commission directed that streets shall tie used to physically connect and relate the out parcels to the Vineyards North Village, 4-nd direct traffic away from Victoria <- 3 . Y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT, 13279 - THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY March 25, 1987 Page 4 D Park Lane. In response to this, the Lyon Company upgraded what previously a trail connection to the "East Entry Road" sPown on the proposed m1p (see Exhibit "f "). Subsequent to the design of the East Entry Roa , the Chaffey Joint Union High School District has entered into negotiations to purchase the southerly 40 acres of the 80 acre out parcel to function as a future high school sit.?. If this 40 acres is developed as 3 high school site this would increase the, ,need for a street connection from the Victoria North Village at Kenyon Way, through the out parcels to Rochester Avenue 'e „Pond what is presently anticipated. With no street connection froal;, Victoria fin the out parcels, access and circulation to this area would be quite circuitous because cf the necessary limitation to access off of Rochester and Highland. The East Entry Road will serve to provide the necessary safe and convenient access to both the high school site to the soy;ch rM the future residential development to the north. The street connection provided by the Ea$t Entry Road is quite important to the orderly and well- planned future development of the property north and east of the Vineyards North Village. However, the present alignment of the East Entry Road in relationship to the planned northerly perimeter of the high school site provides no guar. anteed means at this time to provide a street connection from kenyon Way to Rochester Avenue. Therefore, the map has been conditioned requiring that either, the East Entry Road be realigned as indicated, or some other means of a guaranteed street connection be provided to the satisfaction to the City Engineer prior to recordation of the final map. D. Technical Review Committee: Technical Review Committee reviewed ` the project and di ermined that, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with all applicable Standards and Ordinances. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been comp eted y the applicant. Staff has completed Part Ii of the environmental checklist and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the General Plan. the Victoria Planned Community, and the Area Development Plan approved for the Victoria Vineyards North Village. The project will not be detrimental to eajacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in k -4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13273 - THE WILLIAFt LION COMPANY March 25, 1387 Page 5 compliance with the applicable provisions of the Vict ,)ria Planned 'Comounity, the Development Code, and City Standards. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing\ k in The Daily Re22rt newspaper, the property posted, end notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI- RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve this project through adoptizjn of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declarat�ron. Resp ctfully JuJpitted, Brad B ee City A anner l BB :BC•vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Area' PIan /Lot-ation Map Exhibit "B" Area Development elan Exhibit "C" Tentative Tract Flap Exhibit "D" Conceptual Streetscapa Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" Street Sections Exhibit "p" - East Entry Road A OutFarcels Resolution of Approval with Conditions K -5 Im su ,e i fAr o { :3C uj ru A p :aasaie.d.t: I cl ODE '= LIQIl�IDI� m XF2's�a --- ___ -------------- rsa �..�. e < -i ; Z= 0� Lu 00- ,� w l"�1 � a uj LU W u� OMB UC� � I i► Yom, cc •s ae cm EJ L I b a xis l r 9 p up a g f ¢ i at f � S Oil Y in Q All LU a t Ii Gv:itl AWN+ O _ 1 . •/ r i K- 10 • 31 i r 10 S 4 !4 u K- 10 ma ,g I 7- Lu 2gt #E s ' 3 W �:: i T_ s uj 7- k-11 i a s r k-11 i a h'i� I i1 N LU l fill. $ 9 ,-, Y y U Imp ICIku ati Bi E l% RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING 'EOWISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT RAP NO. 13279 WHEREAS, Tentatiw Tract Map Igo. 13279 hereinafter "Map" submitted by The William Lyon Co., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 308.23 acres within the Vineyards Worth Village of the Victoria .Planned Coanity generally located north of the Southern Pacific Railroad, south of Highland Avenue, west of the flay Creek Channel,, and east of Nil 11100 7Avenue into 13 lots, regularly carne before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on March 25, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has n`co, ended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the 1�ngineering and Planning Division's reports; and I! WHEREAT ,j the Planning Cowft;ion has read and considered',the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidtince presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning CoMMission of the City of Rap ft Cucamonga does resolve as follcus -. SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to en ve Tract No. 13279 and the Map thereof - (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans, (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. K- ! PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLLTION NO. 7 TT 13279 - THE WILLIAM is -YOS COMPAMY March 25, 1987 Page 2 (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on tha environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SEUION 2: Tentative Tract Neap No. 13279 a copy of which is attached hereto, s ere y approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions; i r•iannrne usvisione (1) Six foo \, high masonry walls shall be provided adjacent tr- all perimeter`, roads sham ion this proposed map, and along the tract's `tutherly p4Ameter adjacent to the Southern Pacific Railroad ese walls shall, be staggered and offset (excluding that wally ti scent to the railroad slope) to increase visual interest, Design details of all walls shall be submitted for the revi"d approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of any build)lS j- traits. (2) LandscapeV�i) intenance easdreta ;;will be required adhere perimeter walls encr ;h into private property. These easements are to,be dedicated oe'the final map. The final plotting of all walls aa, locations of all landscape Casements are to be determined prfdi� to the recordation of the final map. (3) The landscape. plan Approved as a part of this snap is conceptual in nature only. A, final detailed landscape plan, n' ci` lud n selection �f planting pallet, shall bas submitted for the review and aoDrovA of the City Planner prior to the issuance of aru building permits. (4) An equestrian "trail shall be provided within the northside parkway of Victoria Park Lane. The final design of the equestrian trail shall be included in the landscape plans aid shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Taalls Coa;;'ttee prior to final approval of street improvement plans. i M The slope on the tract's- south perimeter on railroad property shall be required to=�'randscaped with some type of appropriate ground cover, Final details shall be included on landscape plans and shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City P13nrer. (5) Any retaining walls used are to be a maximum of 41 high. Retaining stalls visible to the general public are to be constructed of a decorative material to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Irrespective of the above, no retaining walls are to be permitted within the right -of -way for Victoria Park Lane. l`..I k 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13279 - THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY k March 25, 1987 Page 3 Ask r Engineering Division e (1) Approval sha11 be obtained from Southern California Edison for the str et and storm drain crossings of their property prior to record0 on of the final map. (2) Approval shall be obtained from the Southern Pacific Railroad for grading, landscaping and maintenance of any slopes within their right -of way,,a�rior to recordation of the fut;re tract naps adjacent to theit��,rJ)9ht -of -way. (3) Highland Avenue sh 7l' be widened on both sides✓ =�f the North Entry Road for a MO. turn lane and a left turn pocket to the satisfaction oUthe City Engineer and Cal Trani (4) The developer\ shall obtain P.U.C. approval for the railroad. ;crossings of Rochester Avenue and Kenyon Way.. t. (5) Rochester Avenue shall be constructed with-full improvements from Victoria Park Lane to Base Line Road. (6) The design o� Rochester Avenue from )'ictoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue sna11 be sufficiently completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer in "order to determine the n precise location of its intersection with Victoria Park Lane. (7) Storm drain facilities shall be constructed in accordance with an approved Master Plan as required by the City Engineer. (8) The construction of an interim retention basin may be necessary at the southeast corner of the project to mitigate increased ,runoff to Day Creek Channel as required by the City Engineer and the Flood Control 6istrict. (9) Food protection mea!mres shall be provided for the portion of the project located in a Flood Zone A. (10) The parkway improvements (trails, landscaping, Ac.) located along the northern portion of Victoria Park Lane shown as outside the tract boundary shall be constructed with t�e tract improvements. (11) The portion of Victoria Park Lane (full width including all trails on both sides) from the east tract boundary to the existing portion to the east shall be constructed within one year of the completion of Day Creek Channel. An agreement to this effect accompanied by an appropriate security shall be completed prior to recordation of the final map. , PLA ikT#�- uOMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13279 - THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY March 25, 1997 Page 4 IA (12) The developer shall bear all costs necessary to acquire the right -of -way (including condemnation procedures) to construct the required offsite improvements for Victoria Park Lane. An agreement to this effect accompanied by an appropriate security shall be completed prior to recordation of the final map. (13) The alignment of the East Entry Road from Kenyon Nay to the east tract boundary shll be resolved prior to recordation of the final map as approved by the City Engineer as follows: (a) it shall be realigned so that its south right -of -way line intiersects the west property line of the easterly adjacent property at a point 40' south of the north line of the south 20 acres of said adjacent property (APH 227- 0:1 -08); or (b) It may be aligned as proposed subject to the developer obtaining offers of dedication for the portion from the easterly tract boundary to Rochester Avenue (a minimum of 401 in width) on an alignment approved by the City Engineer. (14) The existing overhead utlities (telecommunications and electrical) on the north side of Highland Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the west side of Milliken Avenue to the first pole offsite of the tract's east boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future developmnt is not possible. (15) A device (low block wail, curb, etc.) shall be provided at the right -of -way or landscape easement line of all streets as necessary to define the limits of public versus private parkway maintenance 'areas. To the satisfaction of both the City Engineer anO the City Planner. (16) The developer shalt be eligible to enter into a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of street improvements beyond the street centerline from future development of the property on the opposite side of the ,greet, except for development not subject to City review such as: utility corridors, flood control facilities; schools, etc. The reimbursement shall apply, in particular to Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1987.. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: 1rau Butler, Veputy ecre ary 0 , = PLANING COMMISSION R$S'OLdlT'ION NO. TT 13279 THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY March 266, 1987 Page S 1, Brad Buller,. Deputy Secretary of the Planning Couission of the ,City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Was duly and k regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning CondWon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular Greeting of the,blanning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1987, by the following Vote -to -Wit: AYES:: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COhMMISSIONERS.�- ABSEUT: COMMISSIONERS: i 1 I J N a jY ypy,, u ^'1 K�ytlCtl ^a L pLwM .IfCYc Nil 119i r L LIX S :2 * N M y Al wY ^r �aa�yy+ Z CNr 0 .��r�'� yYy rte^ pyssaa L rrryO y_YaI' '�q ^p.,Y_y gN. S� 91-5 Y[Y KNr •+T NO N ev f kA w ; E, >w P � i g �g N ° °•+vu at 1-41 N /� A Z pp yy fit's �� ^t1 p'G^Y .�C! Y V ➢L jig- r� � 1 °p'NFs YG as J >a�=�D `k - 19 .3 n W S N O N a jY ypy,, u ^'1 K�ytlCtl ^a L pLwM .IfCYc Nil 119i r L LIX S :2 * N M y Al wY ^r �aa�yy+ Z CNr 0 .��r�'� yYy rte^ pyssaa L rrryO y_YaI' '�q ^p.,Y_y gN. S� 91-5 Y[Y KNr •+T NO N ev f kA w ; E, >w P � i g � M b §� ITS ^ N cr y a yM1 � a4 � � Y 1 er N `1 1 4 v Y V ➢L jig- r� � uzl J ^� M >r� `k - 19 � M b §� ITS ^ N cr y a yM1 � a4 � � Y 1 er N `1 1 4 v tnZ N a O � d 11 3zuC55jyGaft 1 Egli 7L L�gpY YU JCJ m u Y C. Yr aW ° 4 Y'G pCi o ^ O. aQ~� YOV9 Old ry. ^Mp LYLi1^"�^'yN 6N CN�. O=IL.. p2 -5- p »� CSV^ 0.4 ;B's G ^ C O L� V L• -9-h. Ow■ y`I ' C q N' IX quNiE> � ^p Q S''Y.Njn��vi.K `O Nq L N .J ■ B Ns M Q tU..U. -C A..YU Oa. TNT 4V,UQC O ^L IL.NYY ■�.r U� 0 �.� C M 1[1+yg Yi s- YYYY J6IL1 aU+^ myfi ^Q WY 6� Ib YL .g C! rYy _Y'p :`,^ �y 3 V Y as—'s �g1 N�. +WSCi w _ 9 0 _ p O. V V Y »^ -.s LE L i `q - N ^O g- .52- CLC. t C 2S CC O tts Z. 6'pOpIL J RNIr •Liv Ny = ^uu06 .0U9� 0..0 LCb.i � N:5 _ C V yY QL O•' d °y� � C� 4 q ■C■ -.9Y ay _Y q YYI 9 p G 0 c< a -.V's r Y L .0 .� Y Q Y !. QN6tV �M1 }.L�.0 OYY Qq �Up1 LVL[ inwi KU tmr b t� a .fir w Yk -ao Ag Y ON Q E •n t' d N Y.. Gp4 W L CN O M vur. .• - Ne ,a.� ^a mk.Y L`SS p O L' 5, Lam yY0!� s, -ey�C ea �i Wt��$. OC •C L.P a•C N66 N� Y v nld «s Ys uitL o K pp• V O O° L C�C M c.N1 gQ$"' crm as NN VVp��oTY � » »Q oC�C>q OL S"'p,0 OY4 ^� C IL MUD rd u�.y w `�av «vIL°. °5u5n V qaN Cam,. CCiv�Na... O f.i�O�NV YoyCp YL W 34N. F Gq.r - H�YNC4 /�•�.w66L r� 1 1 & • _« �1ni g ` `� i isNgj L M M` Y Yy O g —3 • ••`• Ag Y ON Q E •n t' d N Y.. Gp4 W L CN O M vur. .• - Ne ,a.� ^a mk.Y L`SS p O L' 5, Lam yY0!� s, -ey�C ea �i Wt��$. OC •C L.P a•C N66 N� Y v nld «s Ys uitL o K pp• V O O° L C�C M c.N1 gQ$"' crm as NN VVp��oTY � » »Q oC�C>q OL S"'p,0 OY4 ^� C IL MUD rd u�.y w `�av «vIL°. °5u5n V qaN Cam,. CCiv�Na... O f.i�O�NV YoyCp YL W 34N. F Gq.r - H�YNC4 /�•�.w66L r� 1 1 & • Y v nld «s Ys uitL o K pp• V O O° L C�C M c.N1 gQ$"' crm as NN VVp��oTY � » »Q oC�C>q OL S"'p,0 OY4 ^� C IL MUD rd u�.y w `�av «vIL°. °5u5n V qaN Cam,. CCiv�Na... O f.i�O�NV YoyCp YL W 34N. F Gq.r - H�YNC4 /�•�.w66L r� 1 1 & • Z N �O L 0. D O Ry' C Q j O C pe +Ill Y L g M r 5 Ps C ! 4 WCC y .-2- UU A a L F S Y- V 4 g Q Y M A NN PxI .. pQp• 2's .5 •Y UOfSO Y 6 �� q .Uyd�p.MyOG L a.� Y L~ Y' A °^ C y Y L L Y G w F u N ^� q Us aNa`o`$ovaE gs nK °h � y O` y q ylR q^ G� O� v 9 U Y.. •� � Y N g Y C. O a pM O N q° u In cG `s� aK a «� °°` �= �cNa�Y+.��+. g SSA •.c 4.ga,ffis ^ w y m Wit/ N•+. SIB. 0.N zU u «....w .Nwu •..}4 ^V� i; pub CL�' G.NV �. «•.w• Q. pity VaNy IY° -.-PC .E-N}y�{ N 4 >09.4 fNn yF T� qYY ILA Oy SL �.. wtl pLYv�' tw ~`° �YxYY pqN GTi qY ~V `SOIL .y CF�w !dp���y rLyu. YN. y, p Y ppl- u� � q N� yy (a p bN �6/ � L U� N N y^ O'� Y..1• Y �J S� O4 �! V N+�NNM ICN." +Kw 2t. »Q bMt KN4 ^�OIS 0I9w G� I4�06 � Y ���pN d Opa aLd w� ab V. w q�O.YC U� C„P ^d9A �y L. t .Gi G Ca 0 6 M: Y v N` p _6 Q■ S= G. ^ Ys °,gala �` N S^ ins` d1M �OFQ NN.UG NI Lei[ u �,l.`M *Y .-.Y e14'- ^ >Y P N LQ °. OI L"�� ;�� 9 NC.d -LG d �O <r ■i t.irw •ppN,i r � =`.1saY�1 ^N, � ^'°• ' w��+ a$.ri �p p$isC� wo_sep�j N Ali !uW ll�Nyq q CY= 6U� N Gam. C�YM ^` C ^Y. d�rl CO�Cggy Tt 6yye wO 9 Yy u C d N p p. L u.! • F Mq p' Y d� u � N y N N q ' OCSGyyI m ^d.n NJj v°. iOC b�L 6M �y vK3 G� C3� ■ ■1 C'1..rYY90p�up� O qYG g3Yr S ti °na. CCr OIA NN �yuL �� gNrT `Yq.cL C� pp°,, • u. }}yy A p L y C '.l Q` 4 Y A. N Y.. Y`° L 3C = =.a C\ C 4 N g q y°LY'�pC r qry wy 1M Cq� O O ylop qO • •d 4addGN� 0 .K - rA. lwO^ OOP A.y : r<'�VN N 1Y M 6ENa ' .•.C-M V .K...4 Y�,. u�I�`lr O 4]r. >qy� G O pKL N �p�p 8 y0.V i6�2a VnAMF s r S O^L 13 AM R d z iJ v •O i !1 C W V ^.« �yl�i WWprr� O L _ �� a.�Q 01^ •�Q CI -Zt V V O� CCY EN4 NOS >.p �0.°l V LLUL • yV =. .On 1. Y age 2.N Ctq. -y 4t4iOV �YVV1I pyL�i. °01 • Ny Ld V�� < v1Y^ V`U U 0.,0,°4 r�6�01 fa 6. N.Y. E�L� as d V q Lp. p p N S S Y�C�am. V�!' a C AI., J�•'�. Y. C V<NV y taU sNU3 y� uu�GTl r S". y eooe q�p � n ,ppv� a y N. uF� § o. Y0..VJ C NCy09C Y°..OSN. '_ Ci. O O V U m^ QU04�:}NSpM Y S r ■ b �. ZOO �fS' ^ y O � FN°N �0 k. Y' vwe.° �•y�ia au'qr�,',u rgg ° v W X � 3p9 C L .C9 cL a �. $ . 4- 0. 4. i'^^. a Pn O O _� V G A. SE O OW uc « °s°J.ey W q I. N q^ d <O. Vq M =191t , yy= v3 °s. ^ �` ,e4 o � OV pJ «pA C.- a C y y:. YYY e S'y 6; yr 9 ye y 6$LY Y O�Qf r LY OY y�Y W O�J 1!—' OOON �Yo qI. C s N r V V Y. Vcy A' "S A' pL Y C C � q Y.0 M L l 6p »! Cw MaJ• p Y paV �¢TO' H tp9N<Y. Y��6i. 49 M ¢�.F =�� O %'" Sq. F.:! i1 q �OYgC `LV¢e�e Qc }yy Npy• F6M iUa 1/�1 Hi��i NW N 4�6ANVsiV� trif?Y.Q YYi y R`Y. ° � L CC d q70 pO CS ✓ L O�g4'YY p � ^F yyyy O�j�.q C� U�Yp °�•°n p N S S Y�C�am. q°1SyY.O+. IZ 'L V O NL Q V O uN .C.`I Ngpq .N q°1q pS $N W.; 4 9_ N `° LvYpy °SP$ ES FN°N �0 k. Y' V g y H>o Y N �� $ tl W X � 3p9 C L .C9 w a �. $ . o °°° i'^^. a Pn ' Y$ °s°J.ey W q I. N q^ �N g nr'c a� Y. v3 °s. ^ �` ,e4 o � wr Y ab pJ «pA �♦ �'_ y X00 LNG � ye y 6$LY No y Y p a u 2--go Y U q C C N M q Y.0 M L l 6p Cw MaJ• p S. L Wp'r O>.� (� p9! r. O %'" Sq. F.:! i1 q LO '__3 2cgl Qc }yy ° uq Y °. .i'.�Q qo�O A s g UCC�U.gQ .8j �Y� j_% M o�� L N Y` uG V. L.Y V N^ ° � L CC d q70 pO CS ✓ L O�g4'YY p � ^F yyyy O�j�.q C� U�Yp °�•°n L OOr + G S-N 6C OVN O $� �N. LLYO qpY <6� GVN+° V Ni 14 14 G 14 4 O 4 1 YGL C Y GQL� L SW � 04 •�/• u.. tYAI Y L. e � C v Y 4 K Y O s E�� LAy SS �Y ��l yM OQ 1� g`. tz YN"�g �M giy`C�C w.:a =e. k 2 qe y `YfLi ii N p�. � i L O C }si:Y 'N� . at 1 Uy Y $p Ya lVi V. rQ_. Y Vg `M Cog i��G9t oM� OY y L X 3 aqY gull y� z. Yj`l� q CW�M aO 4Nlk. UZ MY N�{��O ...-. LI Y�� L� Ar ® • Y ®_Y Y N 9.r Yrl q1l NY. 9a16 YOy.� C N �I YYb aO CRY +j. aSil �3d$ M� ii o $ Lt96�. Y2f3z: Y aN cC uuqq ■w .�` YM HY e�j _011 i Y� w Or�.LG iL•ylY wN YL gY rt.JN � Gr z a ~1! O 4 1 YGL C Y GQL� L SW � 04 •�/• YYYL tYAI Y L. e � C v Y 4 K Y O s a fLfpp!!Yl N �Y ��l yM OQ 1� g`. tz YN"�g R Y #i is `YfLi ii N p�. � 1 1 .._1 �G D C t LAY Q � 04 •�/• t` S�s tYAI ppG. C�� - Yomt. E fLfpp!!Yl a_C 'J ■YY �Y ��l � � L is Cp 6a��5 ~r. IL Its - C y� •® Yj`l� q CW�M aO ®Q.� 4yrW` h L^ qN—■ 1'gT + O 9.r Yrl q1l NY. 9a16 YOy.� C N �I YYb aO CRY +j. aSil Lt96�. Y aN cC uuqq ■w .�` YM HY i`O Y� w Or�.LG iL•ylY wN YL gY rt.JN � Gr z a ~1! 5 _3 y slw� { q +L Y ^ ` O e p ^ Ot^ 11 &w•! «7i rd.�Y. 'D.e�°., «¢q ry aR L °•"• og M rdw.�"»� Y V d G$ O m. N Yy V. S Yid Ol Y D Y Y Sl l� ap V. TO CG! �d0 7� b0U= 1&1 e tl NON�SMs4 SYM� 17'Y:�4^"�V WNQ uuu . 01:9 .910 C V a i z ci m •n i a 11 f. r_ s`3o`ov N��LrS �� �_N s $sue s ` � S •• °g`Y =� El z u s S p y 8 v ay a. 6 0��..� Yn�..�a tlC6 d 4fM �! S. ey�V�.� ± • B EsO � ���. aL S4 L. R. a r o C- i 4 q t $ o Y e N`u sue. .... ♦ `cam £i«N L°aw�. ��Y• t. en �a >. Q.�' 1i B $� y��-'M �Qv. �o «.� kc oeo ; .N$ '�q r'rn s gZ S wKQ T me $� v 'uL w W p QQY,,yiy O � Y O�b �N e G L - =N .`V to � • a� ggyuy 8 .� � A L H ♦ q O rg �"= sy 6 Y �GCpC 1 D �W°°w4. y�GS ` y _ Ca ab9 gC- B O ! 6 G O 8« G Oy Yo b■ My A N Uw bq B �++x w {qqq� a !y� •.9 Lr � aN e•, w _� <PL W C all r—d. cp <L V 33 I Oil ji gZ S wKQ T me lL 4 O�b �N ,YQN -Z N pt� c'o � ♦p5, RY '�� L H YY dap N�0.w.p S6 76NY /. YHp �GCpC 1 D �W°°w4. y�GS Q� +g �y B • ! 6 aL � d6 V GN G s: as r a 6 N 1 < -y i o me lL O�b �N ,YQN -Z N pt� PB � ♦p5, RY '�� L � YY dap N�0.w.p S6 76NY YW YHp �GCpC 1 D �W°°w4. ya� o `'` +g 8z � B • aL � ppyy GN G �N d as r- a 33 I A N 0 z as v a 0 L a r ti r "Z pap N! p o I r_ u n L 4A. VK�yya as Y pz CL. yY b L C^ 0Q Y YM S C ^ bJ' L Y N Lr .. Ka u+8�" V Q` 3 ° y", 'sY Ci.N, Y nv p4 H Nc. .r6v L�r. N.OY @K ... �OrL ND ^ ;- M� Y rtu r�.'CN ° 2 C� QIZ °G e ygyaLL� Y 1 .. C �l CyYt. A ar's Q va-iJw us n YY t�' °V L63K V ��. 4NLTL pA 5..�8 �� �t 44y.Y w4L VY� pYd J ya{9. N G •Lf W y2 Vw'Q iY � yM V 4�aa aaYa �; "=2 Nom:!+ °C h64 L M° C L C 6 N. �~ O a4 Su 2Q -' a SV9 M C Y d y' ±if r ti r T �H E I„ I T' I� C 0 M P A N I E S ._ I P /ariul!!8 fuy(fu&JuMT71($.i li{G lJfe•).tu (tart(e irt�lJl C.'ure•(tlt {�u S'C {•Gtr. C&wnjcrjon (ahageMeh! r March 191 1987 Ms. Nancy Fong �K Associate planner Community Development Department C City of Rancho Cucamonga t P.O. Box 8071 f: Rancho Cucamonga, California,:91730 "1 �4 RE: DR86 -37 Cornerpointe Master Plan l Parcel Map 103 -93 Dear Ms. Fong:; i On behalf of my client,. The Lusk Companies, w@ request a` continuance of our Planning Commission meeting scheduled for March 25, 1987 to April 8, 1987„ in order to allow us to further study the design issues brought to our attention in the Design Review. Thank you. sincerely, �f /Director obert 't.unnin am of L dsca Architecture' 80hee5treet. `I i ,'00 Cwtaflte". C4 92616 ('IJ) 540.Oft00 1609E "radate 04%1.54e D. Palmdale. CA93550(605)2- 3.9?•f4 { 1! 1 5225Car{ vaCre& Ddt v. Eaiidin9300 .cukt307,RkvWde.at9250" ('141692.71''0 I " 0 �� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCI- � STAFF REPORT �4 Agh i ��� CyCAIbfO,�y t C 7 a ;. E}• DATE: March 25, 1987 1877 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning. Commission F04: Brad. Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy F('Ag„ Associate Planner SUBJECT, 05VELOPIi9l7 REVIEW 86 -40 - CHG ARCHITECT, INC. <.•' The 1 deve opmea o —a4, —a4,wo square toot 6affic ur Pacific National Bank) on O.68 acres of land w%:h n an approved 15.3 acre shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial Oistriwt of the Terra,Vlsta Planned Community, located at � the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Havel Avenue - Y APH 202 - 801 -25, 26. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requessed: Approval of the detailed site plar9 e eva �Qns. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or z Care a e� r, 3Tn—gla Family Homes; Medium Residential District-(8 -14 dwelling units /acre) South - Vacant, Single Family Names; Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units /acre) East = New Single Family Homes; Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units /acr ) West - Single Family Horses; Lair Residential (2 -4 dwelling #ts /acre) r C. General Plan Designations: Prolec site - Nelgnbrrhoo d Commercial District North •• Medium Density Residential South = Medium Density Residential Last - Medium Density Residential West - Low Density Residential _I D. Site Characteristics The site is vacant and slopes generally from nor o sou . Vegetation consists of native, grass. The northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue is designdted as the major gateway tq the Terra Vista Planned Commw,ity which requires a speci�Av theme and landscaping treatment. ` -` ITEM P PLANNING COMMISSIGH STAFF REPORT DR 96 -40 - CHG ARCHITECTS, INC. March 25, 19$7 Page 2 E. Parki'alculations: Number of Number -o k Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Bank 4,000 1/250 16 42 II. ANALYSIS: K.ener`al: The project site is part of the approved Terra Vista VTTTaye Master Plan of an integrated shopping center as shown in Exhibit "C ". The approved Master Plan for the shopping.; center indicates' that this pad area is planned for a future retail building. The developer i ..,proposing to construct a Security Pacific National Bank on this site. Thz proposed site plan is. consistent with the approved Master t� Plan of this Terra Vista page Shopping Center. The proposed elevations contain the architectural details of the approved shopping center such as towers, arcade around the building, and curvilinear gable. S. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Chitiea, Busier) on AML February 19, 19ol reviewed the propgsed project and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. The stucco over detail should be of heavy wood to provide adequate shadow patterns. 2. Heavy wood eafters should be added to the-, ;fi rst lever of *he roof line. 3. Thy curvilirea( gables as shown on the east e "' �Ition should, lowered to be below the hey;' ,ght -,4e os vne tower. 4. The stucco material and color should be of "Santa Barbara" Style, consistent with the Terra Vista Village Shopping Center. 5. Random ,tacking of clay roof file should be provided, consistent with the Terra Vista Village Shopping Center. 6. The landscaping under the west and north arcade ; should be changed to textured peaestrian walkway consistent with the Terra Vista Village Shopping Center, in lieu of the landscaping, tree wells ,;•; and free standing potted pianters should be provided long the west and north arcade. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 86 -40 , CHG ARCHITECTS, INC. aj March 25, 19871 Page 3 , <ri 7. The revised elevations should include conceptual signage and shall be submitted for additional Committee review. j The developer revised the elevations incorporating most of the Committee's recommendations and submitted for Committee ?view on March Sj� 1987 under the Consent Calendar itertl? _ " " {he CoW -(ttee rkyiewed the revised elevations, and recommended approval witk the condition that the top of the curvilinear gable should be in line with the bottom of the roof line of the tower.. The conceptual signage should „be designed to be consistent with the uni sign program 'for the shopping center. C. Environmental Assessment: Staff has o'Pleted the Environmental Cec s affil has determiined that no;,, significant adverse impact would result from the devei opt► /nt of this project. Further, a Negative Dec "araVmn has been issued for the Master Plan site area on August 13,"1986. III. FACTS FOR FiftD!NUS: The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of MF General Plan. and the Terra Vista. Planned Community. The oroFtsed use, building design, site plan, together with the' recommended conditions of approval are. in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Planned Community. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfar3,'or materiaily injurious to properties or- improvements in the vicinity. IV. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve eveToppment Reviai 86 -40. 4ity il sow, , er ne r BB:NF :te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Approved Master Plan Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Conceptual landscape Plan /r Exhibit "G" - Eleva�l ons Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions P3 4-T. . r i� t t M1 " .- t�,7 r y. `fit NORTH CITY RANCHO r T CLCA MU G& rr PL.ANNI \G DIVEIOiN TME � E.XHtBrr- SCALE; ..•-`' P5 k Y ✓' f' � lr�j✓ � � r' /. ,..� � � /r;'frr i 357'.. �1�''•- 1 `., � ti i� �� /'tip' •i; 'i/� -� � t � ! Y \ \ \k .t\ VA 4 v4 at ti lit, till �n IT Ar till 'J'1 At ni+ Ll • x ��t; t r IFEN y�t , t VA 4 v4 at ti lit, till �n IT Ar till 'J'1 At ni+ Ll as.a' 1', DRtvt;Wi.Yi i 2r -a r J.S,s je'•a� -31 J `4 __ 2D7.3Yt PROPERTY WVE-j 1t Fuil St., 177 ' Tr"ft '• Ll Security Pacific Napalal Sank N, i t ( Ie EnobsW auaT y Am. 4400 SO.Ft. Q FIN. FJi. EL 22.0 V. In -.BASF LINE F•.OA42 - .�_'_,^ �- -- 1 ' 4 i ... kS�m.. °,.d' mw• R r: a..nrF.eicx.n.usw t.31'.w JrAt ` 400 NR.44. Rlyd, t,.. An k& CA;001: (313)413.4240 SITE SECTION B -B 10 0 CHCG SITE SECTION A —A ` r .2a•r I (YRTY f CITY OF ITEM: ! RANCHO CL°CAjva0 ►GA TtiLP: IfI� PLAN ING P LIN'LSI N EXfilmT SCAB: - P7 7a 7'. 17 NORTH i CITY OF, Aft. RAINCHO ✓UCANIONGA -nTi-P=_ PLANNING MOON RIO AML 41 7'. 17 NORTH i CITY OF, Aft. RAINCHO ✓UCANIONGA -nTi-P=_ PLANNING MOON RIO Alft 3 Av c v 7z� T. moo 10 01 7z� T. I 1 { - 207.371 PRDPEXTY LINE •^ --`j �1 } YG� E Taaall Security Pacific Naticnat Bank EnOasatl- ebld%f AMC 4,900, SO.M. t N F -1 \ FOR LAND$CAPINO OF THIS AREA �- BEE PLAN L -1 — FOR LANOW. :..NO DF THIS AREA BANK SIGN t 8 f -� SEE PLAN S -, j BASE�LINE,ROA6 � - � '- NORTH CITY OF T RANCHO CLCAj�vIGNfGA TITLE: PLANNING DjVjSIoN EXHIBAT' SCALED ID--10 .r,Ub - iill{ttfilR. .w�wuul�4r����luW 1 IUlU�1lGllitllltplp iiNj +ut�liltiuu t nut li l fe «ih r nnnl lxnliwutl y uw r ueu w NIIiySINNUHW Ht 1h WW t . J6{Sxt117{if {741 nttlgliltl4{IfNitpN t11 1 aN 1 �iYt�N11NiN11i�N)�lil ut ��'wixa . nuelMi111f111» »llunuu4»tl»tell� NgNjl(..... Mnlliyit . u ei ..i n; k igl45n�eia .. e a , • -.:: 4L al 1 u«tx$ruu��U�ux::au :�t,l��t 1 it t 4t 1 t!� lfHNt9 �I�tnitfH{xNilltli{IiHy{lift��i{��wtutf�It4:��iHt:f� +ni{► 'tltiHiui .l�:aie�• - -,aws* i1�'ixlt >•riirt °�: -W �'ra ar.� s ►iilaS�NMM, y�l. 11 _Ilb��111MM�M1Ne�1�MHfl�i;_. :. 1 I S 6URiTY RAC1iaC SAW SOOT ,•CLEAR- GLAZED WINDOW SYSTEM WOOD PANEL NORTH CITY QIaTC`I= Al r PLANNING DIVISON EXHIMT= SCAt.&._/._- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO.. 86 -40 FOR A 4,000 SQUARE FOOT BANK LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNEA OF BASELINE ROAD AND HAVEN. AVENUE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 11th day of February, 1987, a complete application his filed by C.H.C.G. Architects, Inc. for review of the above - described pr'ojeat; and WHEREAS, on the 25th��Q y of March, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above- described project. . follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga:P1�,inning Commission resolved as e I SECTION 1: That the following can be mete 1, That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and Terra Vista Planned Community; and 2. That the ` proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Manned Community and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of `the Development Ccde and Terra Vista Planned Community; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or imiprov- ,ments in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That thi'_,,project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen an at a Negative Declaration has been issued for the Master Plan (CUP 86 -06) on August 13, 1986. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 86 -40 is approved subject to the follo`w1'ffg7`co—n-ditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. All conditions of appro.ial contained in Resolution 86 -119 shall apply. P -13 `> PLAWING GUMMISSYflfd RESU UTION NO. OR °86.10 . CHG ARCHITECTS, INC. March 25, 1987 Page 2 2. The stuccq over shall be of heavy wood to provide adequate shadow paL, erns: 3. Exposed wood located at the first level of the roof line shall be 6 inch by 10 inch consistent with Terra Vista Village Shopping Center. 4. The top of tfie curvilin6, gable shall be in line with the bottom of the roof line of the tower;,__ __ Revised elevations shall be submitted for Design Review Gommittea review and approval prior to issuance of Wilding permits. 5. All exterior materials, including stucco /plaster, wood panels and colors and texture shall match the approved materials and c+alors for Terra Vista Village Shopping Center. A building,-,materials sample board shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of r building perRits, r� _ f ' 6. Random sta,: 7 PL N fiS TSSTO I2ESO�,J 14bg NO. OR'8� CHG ARCN'fTECT', INC. March 25, 1987 Page 8 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comission of the City of � Rancho Cucamonga, :do heC!eby certify that the fpregoing:Resolution VAas du?y and regularly introduced, Fussed, and adopted by tnJ planning Come I n of the City of Rancho Cu'camonq,a,"at< a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit; AYES: COMMISS16NERS. NOES., COMMI.SS'IONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; l r r k _ ryryi r /r o Q Y S�{ +i t1 U � 4J a yy t 4 .rZ. • O W N O r G C n w ..V. jajai� 4@yg .� 9ypM� T. b q 0.0 uO99y ^C� �C pY O � 6�4�;yG 'L ♦L YvN. B O� N �. �. �i .. tV o„ G, yOOV J Y �+tNt ��- ^L^ pz _.B '�^nC puaRQt^ q wnN^ �N �GCb&YO YwVO �°�r!SE tan, aEuy' Gs Qa qy M pL 0— CA S A.Ss{�^p 3mr ffCpy gi? .GCs N.yp d gi�aa�" v uGCe a(cc w y°c4�e[' a �µg yu�����i �yC �T�QQ^,M 33C r �YfiaF -a I1 �Y1N yi.Y. �\YYL Y w@ w 0 w Rij vs� m N O Z12. D I3 b sit N F G Y H q 4 1uL Mc T=om. t ifa - > > S is V pC ti L G Ny �au x ai ti $' w Fn E-41 �n .4 N A a uA s Y it W a s..N. a s e e Z ZJ I w i � ! i • •t i s Y it W a s..N. a 4 �2DT .,g t y �r c a yayNCUF wACaLwa� any o`� --�a «�' f} Y n� it Y of r., a �,,, e 9 .+2 n4D YCY� ar'P(�y�Y PU u� Wp�wy Ne. 44 a X-11 «N�•jLL n4�'�V�a� wyggY. 1j }CY, Ya Aiip Aq '— R 5 ° a~ �w cY+ sa.NZwti yv�yyyi-C�}ay�y,� AN CYYTA �Yw., p Y�x° ylyi YA MG. Y °y� A°qk rpp~ ur Cuao.°wpo,'Ipp V4'7i 1. �'^i•yVy. i usO.C?. »� 1PGyg.�YN Y YC`.� pY a.�.$L^' y+ 7y,.V: I.°iw 44a +a cv- L COI'+H aSi 4� c Y iDp '.N tlG E o d Cpf a *pggo -= ucry ■nppp{ DA Mi•9�r. N9 ` YCY.0 Aw9 Lpi N�C✓d0 C set. Y� yM Ca. Ate' AgY.$.L --alas •x$ , �rtO+yry. y�wN. 4 My Op. aCµa� Yrd il »YT^PC� C.•�i �� \°+.�°"•. �.Qa�i b't^yf 4�°. M'�w� N q{�. �' pa'°rN SY O`er 7N. �A °c�d Pa i�A 8Z'S 1 Y T �SlhM' c N w Aa+ l erg S ;qz•'S �aw4 6MYi +� ii f 43 LggY yt L'A'A gprt �� C ,p 4y8 L ♦ • Y LL A �+ � T ^ w W A 1: � � t � � � Zm� V O3 YG ^ CC s yY � ylM1Oy Ty„ L°.°*.fw Q �{4�a jAA. al � C O■ ^Q�C 4A myw M'ztt uN C� 6 fY ji -A 'V IjQ nRRCN {yS E' L••'F� �. yNS ^YF+q! LOiL AG7Z _ CwLw a Aj Lc a CM Z�pp M 'Y w_ toe- u2 Op rr L YS��W yG '....hui wAY ^Q qw YYq'd- vcs ti ve P.p n cch yy .a rRwNSwi V £ +° iV<C 9Y qA y�'�a Y L g 6 C ►� L K nnLR A F.rNQ i(TNp v� 1(y gyp gu9� uo i6 tli w � n 4 V N wy. L ywj L41t D M K-121. uwy -i Y� Ny _CC Y 3yz 'F Ow pa�''OOy'�ry. Z �Q UCLbL �6�wY AY OmyYa °ODUCC +w P�a yy S=Y =�giN MKGU�� N= �lKagw r$c, 'I c'rMl a9 NANM tf.ry t 153 �Y.Y� ° _ rv' wc�� ^$ Yc.. °6 4 h� XF pNp» „aNS <4� q­8 6L D.a aa � Rio c ='sa >v YCAYL +'�" 1T++JrMCAMAK/6� P!f 7 I s a f y q 27=-4.t22 v�g Qg g P E pj�`Np �n, y"N S Y auZ pL ZN. w 54 $'.p Ny VC. O. u1 nxxo L CppC �y6yy�� YM`°', C•anQgyS „vpY C Cy 53 L'La°• ceuy s.. aL RAN. Q v L• � N u S u C N y !LO 6E dC `y C LC d C i a�t�1 va `6N r� YN+.LY.Y Ys- L.� +fZfw .L -C O4 CNy M� ON YI.IM �° rL`( CY L9O N. O.6M 9 ?� �9 N pq�8"Aa b1:3 j ^1� Y.�C a,rL U. -7z- Y 0 y N v~v O Ct L O u Y. t a u x Ol �. L N y? L.n $ L C C 7 • in a q�l+ 0' ��w 4J ayOaa mY. 6 ♦�. '�' pp�.a �! y y CI Y OI C Y Y a• U L e.1 �v . a! N w u A c. !: J w N �W„N• __1 ^a''e Y oa N rg.. M C onL 4= w 5. L c^ ,fir w�ac 'OF1w Yaf � n ° ua inq L'. �r� a4ywV aE new ygLU fj .'c•N• b aw rS�b.... �L3N � Ya wn� „. COd.N.a &ti.:o °a$OV” gtM =„ "4.N « s g c LL N vu �V Y vs y �°N da 'd!L' Pu.` uL,Y^Qy CYV �J pN^ CV� t' N y L.�i nC OM �rV.yA ±V4 r.W w ^ YG1°F Y° dudGN Of Yp6 a9M 6•`.�� .C.y�• L9 6�1 GGdN wZ u.O q.8 vu°iy�.Ll CT ��O. C. PO^ V°a.= @ • OL 9 rY H^ `y p R� MV O ■NUwp� d yNy9�P�0C 4yy.O1 C O'uwY � e �e' L Cap OLY+O • YtY ay> C� w^. ."S■^ L.`r V C..YwJJ :i w_ai �' ..w f.i !LV LN l�L�adi:Y' 'N Lt V ^�. pG� aC4.. ■��6 L :21 ••i•GY d:L V Awq CTC>pa� •Cd pr iN6• WO nMNa°e YO. o PY9 W In i 0 CI a �o E A Y+� C Y z.� u N ` yGC M O C =pp Ya yQ wL14 -v L aq. ;� L - >, •a ^yam +C' p � �ris. � p 6"4 oVU�� u~CC7 y+�M ay� aNNy p�9 ZVI MCr �CVC� !.M •r a'�N �gAA{`JM3 NY.i p M ~N Y� REM R~ pp V3.1 M R yy G ^b. O1^ c1 C R Gr+ f) �ci�Y aav� fit HIEVY' Un D 'Aga Y f,22 1.p . L= L C L E4L� .12 LD N'sp YRjQy � C: W 14 L iS .3W Y N N S A R w j 4 c C 6w a a 6 } 9 � L N y1 Yq �i1�F_YS V4 V a14� aiwy �lW Xj Y ��R �1ee Y S it j Y.0 a ^4a ^ ifs. ��Y NbYV Mp ,SM « 'tly "s c .6..�p0 ��LQ gyp{ 3 2 gu V� GG p CCGy L aY' L(OF �` p Nti V•'1bF V.0 u� 'od1 p6�S i` ON. Ip. iw 1«Y. 4¢Q.^..�0 �K 61nw �. •t7 rt. 0 %�dr `c Lc t� k p-:3 z C pCy,Y LY L VNY b -_ L .5M o�[pa 4Lp a�y4!f YL'46 C NL 4Y.a � C�4 ypwi ppp pppp yc %. ayLO oNw G�.py r Mqt L01 W. Yia�y wyi +R' Y np 4 U p p �LyYyC # ■■ p 1 p •` p t `• ° •n. V p N 4 p o e �; i N t '0` N p« L o C'. ?s y; Y 4 9 N i Yp4a C Y T L.COY .. 101.r. C� p S Q L� M pOw �', wy 0e p4 •* Y Z yMU N iywi 1f 4�w � y..d aL E qq 4R a „L 9CyxL DC + yNC�ae 2�+�C^p�E,y�Q`' �gt`a{�y1N4A Tma a 9 C 01 �Oy � 6 yY cy O t ti l qom CC IIQ CCW WH y +4 C01�w q a L E w 4 F. Rol R-.w. Q. •auy crt nt ... ys... 'c ' °c 44� Opu a.. � 9`M� !f 1 Y a ^4a ^ ifs. ��Y NbYV Mp ,SM « 'tly "s c .6..�p0 ��LQ gyp{ 3 2 gu V� GG p CCGy L aY' L(OF �` p Nti V•'1bF V.0 u� 'od1 p6�S i` ON. Ip. iw 1«Y. 4¢Q.^..�0 �K 61nw �. •t7 rt. 0 %�dr `c Lc t� k p-:3 z C pCy,Y LY L VNY b -_ L .5M o�[pa 4Lp a�y4!f YL'46 C NL 4Y.a � C�4 ypwi ppp pppp yc %. ayLO oNw G�.py r Mqt L01 W. Yia�y wyi +R' Y np 4 U p p �LyYyC # ■■ p 1 p •` p t `• ° •n. V p N 4 p o e �; i N t '0` N p« L o C'. ?s y; Y 4 9 N i Yp4a C Y T L.COY .. 101.r. C� p S Q L� M pOw �', wy 0e p4 •* Y Z yMU N iywi 1f 4�w � y..d aL E qq 4R a „L 9CyxL DC + yNC�ae 2�+�C^p�E,y�Q`' �gt`a{�y1N4A Tma a 9 C 01 �Oy � 6 yY cy O t ti l qom CC IIQ CCW WH y +4 C01�w q a L E w 4 F. Rol R-.w. Q. •auy crt nt ... ys... 'c ' °c 44� Opu a.. � 9`M� !f 1 Y 1- 11 t $�y 3� c . g � 4P y RLppg Y`V$V�R. Yx RNitlsq �p C` Y4M Vo hill QM` ^. i YRNO l�r po�iyi• �M yV�gO gA e-H y8 i41y ! M y py iS C�a•�y Nf.� ...�uYY �MMM AV 4a \ Yn OM C N y .wj¢� YR qG'ai d4_.y ��a mac■ �^ �• � �:i 1Y� Paq{wa gi ltY3 r.♦ CN 4 � � M � -R}� � � +� w ♦� • $O.pw i uV ,R � YR �4{�4LY'b �' ♦ =SCM —`JyYx Pip! + jf" I. flt� N.v[■ �,. i;j j Kf —J Iv� 1C�3V® I' 171t fit}= 'ti± y`My ;M yY�S c3i� :j Q _ tV iii 'V � ' rit -.cvt... gist' ^a o r +MC moo v C Ca. C az +— {44�'. ` e1. i, w e K $ vy !f w s! S` g' V; L%�4 •.^ y Y if 0= N� i�N Y999999y �.= �U 4b a�1« u y �i �Y`'1:. j� u OQ �Ci y 21.4 •0`. Y1 ^Y4y:�a�. E. a y ty�. {{,�NC YV 6O. Y0 t p��R �` 6R a �. A. .C� N « Y• O�r `SR izl M + uwN�•� PY is ^/ N M V �� `— y � �II Q K M �a iiR:{�i { ^L 6. V Wa "a Y'ri�w ■C. NM Oy pp Pn ^saC ^ . Q OE r'� � o .°ice R O'S � a Y! it .. r C`�+ KHI ���ypypypYr 001YaC C a,'' µ m.r o« e^" �. w � y�` u a .• CC n a a a t� y � � O� �,�' 00• � NN°He '4.S�IQ OO.�O:i`V. WIV: Wy .J �G 1V.� Oak :; ► R ti P_ 1- 11 w 6C O L nrt SA ZZ Vyw' a cg o' ex 5 o .. + k %z �L Y �.. +�` ewe, -i.� rw' O4 Y M VYTSY�.p y"�.l Y�LR Nom, �� C_V-4� i +L ~� V 0�.�L! a.a ` `� O'NV _d �� V`�-�� �N �� ..�� 'y. .��C4 �. fd4. rrq�yy• 341 r rX 9.9 OCL r3Op� z. -FT `r YC4 LR•=. 4p 4.Ca l 7 �� f{ f ig sM V, s — Q n� p ° Cdr gips 9 O qN e. viv v+aw ArO tafW ■ y eve_ CC y s.. Vr^L. �?yA IS rX 9.9 OCL r3Op� z. -FT `r YC4 LR•=. 4p 4.Ca l 7 �� f{ f ig sM V, s — Q n� p ° Cdr gips 9 O qN e. viv v+aw ArO tafW s vi f rs v a •o a. s� I �.La pV a =n � �oN � 8 V O�{• tL. �/ �yO�y a nn � Mr 6C ° °iy icy �. oL 7 O. j O V «. •+C.% « °un c • "�.'yu ^�JJ3r ~ �uu �`Fi �'a�cq '°''_+�_. �° c'�' r zQgpqa •• LL u.` �a�n, Vy e �CC �x O•'4.0\ C�tl� �p My�9 y«V • qqV 6.5� ' L°J H� 'n« p�1 Yr `9�ec pLfi 'Sig ti.K i1Nyy33L. {6� °M' EV'B•�N 1.�"=a V{y q.. r� I �x ccYe n$ =wX CY 3 °S Y C 6B F2 uMC a. c".. .es wa..« ra � tY� si cr{ea' •C 4. LTV $9H. r « ° P --- --- - : <' ; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOXIGA STAFF rTPORt Da',TE: March 25, 1987 ) 1�> _ 10: Chairwn and fibers of the alanningCowi ssion _ FROM: => Brad Butler, City Pldnner = 1' BY: Debra Meier; Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENTOONMEe AL AssnSMEN'T AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW( 96 -42 - 1E .` '1 ne eve opp ant of -1 n us r a l-gi enan nun 'ngs totaling 1°67,754 square feat on 9,15 acres of lani,Aa the bdostrfa? Park nystrict (Subarea 7) located on VAIN north side of Arrow Highway between White OL;c and . fw,1e Streets APN 208 - 351 -60, 61, 67 -70. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action _ _7Requestea: A&oval ' of -ite.. plan and bail ding e eva :ons an ssuance A& oval Negati4`Declarati),ln. qF B. Surrounding Land Use,and 7(,pjng- Rorti`rF� - vi'neya",=innust'riai- Specific Plan (Subarea 71 South - Vineyarif, Indvtj :`moo+ Specift elan (Subarea 3) Cast Vineyard; ndusi-,4al Sppiific Plan (Subarea 8) West - Vineyard, Indv,Arial Specific Plan (Subarea 7) p C. °General Plan_ DoT nations= t WdSPI t Si " c er`al"f hMstri a i " North - Industrial Park South - Heavy'Industrial East - C6ieral Tndustr iafi West - General Industrial D. Site Charatr..t0istics: This site, os well as undevelopec areas around t, Fm n n use as vineyards. Curb and gutter is' existing along all streets. Developmeat of the parkwa,7 will occur at the time of construction of ttte project. The natural ground slopei gently from north, to south at abo.at 2 %. Tbe site '.s also a part of the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park. ITEM Q 16 "K� PLANNING STAFF REPORT OR 86-42 Marck�' 2S, 1987 pa§6,2 JdM6 6 E. Parking Cilculatiops: Sluare Parking No. Spaces No. Spaces I _0fUse Foo4�,'-_� Ratio Required Provided Off ice 36,811 1/2,60'i, 1,47� 147 Multi-T%�nant 102,786 ol/400 357 261 Total 408* *In addition, there are eight bi,cycl-e- parkinr;�-, racks. which is equivalent to two additional vehicular parkinj spaces. 11. ANALYSIS: A. General: 'Me, projdLu' COnSistS of eleven buildings, two of whicfi Z two-stciry office buildings facing Arrow Highway; the remaining buildings are single story intended frr multi-tenant li�ht industrial users. The Vte contains four outdoov, lunch plalas for ccmon use of the project, cop-lete with shade trees and appropriate hardscapi­-.—_qtfis Usie Exhibits uC*' and 00"). Arrow Highway is des%A"e� a Special I '� Boule�iard, -and requires meandering sidewalk, intentiffid, iindscapfnq, and creative,ai.chitectural consideration. 13. Design Rei'ie4 Comitfie: The Design Revidw�_CommitteL-' has reviewed thls proJ-e-;";'­Fn-7our separate occasions, the CommIttee members bei Ag Chitlea, Larry McNiel, and Brad '�Mler. The project had major issues to resolve including'. I. 3ite PlInnin6. Overall pedestrian �"C'irculation did not connict parking areas and public transit facilities with building entries and open spacti nor provide adequate handicap dccessibility. The vehicular circulation was awkward and inconsistent with City policies. 2. Lanidscaping. Landscaped areas 41nhin the project were narrow an&'Tneffectively used. The design did not create oppdrtupities for clustering trees or focal points to enhance visual interest or complement building archito--cture. 3. Arrhittscture. The buildings lacked articulatio def building surfaci and did not address SpReciar Boulevard s nd6rds f9r the Arrow Highway streetscape by providirtg crotive architectural consideration�,�! 16 PLANNING COMMISS11M STAFF REi)ORT DR 05 -42 Leff March 25, 1987 Page 3 k Once these major issues were addressed, the Cowmittee recow*nded approval of the project with the following conditions: 1. Ali ndscaped ar s shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width, unl 1 they are .diacent to loading areas, in which case 4 feet would th be acceptable. Whenever possible, landscapeo are `sliml be provided that will allow clustering of gees to be planted for best aesthetic effect. 2. The en'trie to the tax+ -story buildings that face the i parking lot show receive textured pavement (brick paver) treatment and & ditionai ;andscaping to produce` a more aesthetic entr statement. 3. The pedestrian pathways that cross drive aisles should be concrete, edged with brick pavers. r C. Technical Review Cow0tteei The Technical Review Committee has rev ear pro ec an -determined' that with recommended conditions of approval the project is consistent witt* i applicable City Standards )and ordinances. In addition, ! overhead utilities exist along the opposity- side of Arrow Highway. Since it is9the opposite side of the street, the � Engineering Division recommends that an in -lieu fee be paid for fut;,re unJergrounding of these lin;<s consf� tent with Commission policy. The in- lieu fee would am6unt .to one -half the cost of undergrounding from centerline of White Oak . -Auenue to centerline of Maple Place. O. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Part T of the Initial study aifi­d-7-art 11 it a Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant environmental impacts related to the development of this business center. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS This project is consistent with the Industrial 5Pec1f1c, Plan and the General Plan. The project vili not be detrimental :. to adjacent properties or cause ',,4gnificant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed sit�',plan and building design, together with recommended conditions., are in compliance with the Industrial Area Specific' Plan and City Standards. l PLAN�dII!{a (+iiSs�Iti �F REPORT �. DR 86-42 Z Zbf . March 25, M,7 Page 4 � V. RECCWHENDATIONY Staff recomwds, a reval of ve!� f p#t D� �n Review t roue the adopti.vn o±� the attacied' r . reotutionr, and conditioni�of approval and issuance a a 4egative Pec'ibration. n Resp fully fitted . B rads ter City fanner Attachments.:. Exhibit Location Asap Exhibit "B" d Site Plan �i Exhibit "C" • 'Landscape Plan Exhibit "DO R Lunch Court Detail Exhibit "E " - Building Elevation T►Oo- storvf k Exhibit °F% - Bulging Eleva, Single st7ry ExHbit,% *" - Enlarged Details F 3 Resolnion of Approval with 'Ccnditicisrs 1 4 of i'o ass RTH CITV OF, LA _ C wRti•i paa.{fH P (a }R iw[D I 'w'ela°Y' tf[„fraac`s i � (nKM.n..nas1 GYP JAwMIt .rAaf_w•n sd w/.yak l[+4M✓f � ! : tis JSg vysm 4aMUMJwa•.' JAttJ .++el.ee ..fr.rji/[x+n4 r+e+JMi J.[wV .xias nymf >a• mA• iu.r[• .as;Jar o. IMf.tiP. W+J J+ea� eimf P_eP . NGPr C•uS A.iP alwP awNl ,iWV!! t°iwcii! 1[.•m ayTjAa mMNif[PMaii��•�p�s MLi <AN�Pie� /•vwt �[pw�•� •i �s ti1'wru ,ne, .a. l.•a ��� JYMb.iitia • / iAt crry OF rrcM9 ix RANCHO CUCANIONCA 'i'i'x'i s, i ce ., PLANNING BIVISIQ`1 LXHIW:— _ SCALC=._:� 0 WHITE OAIt AV t, lo A9 9 0.1 1: AV L I PLACI LEGEND W400AM" Z. 'OUF4UUvY' L 12 r— � klAeOljhY NALUP W TSANI OWrLCt�UX16 BlIOpA'rAlRM04T' rriuijuotwrmAAjA CH� C11414LC- "AfkNUC. Z-iel MONW9. 61riNIP17 ILJMCA MA4LIQUA, OTOUATA Aetllel WI�Zl AWI UAU-,fPe"ew"c"h mx ATMs OUCAL(P � j 9W7Wj "J,Uu VUO*k . Elm SHAJOS i AMJA S. 40WHCR. AIAW.Ab, CAWftft t&CA"41A, C-ROEUlm,, CapWk& C.. tr V- A, jmwtch, vitowulAw" +Z I ar.LM64M JANWICA, TPVWftAfWAWK jki�mlualvcv A MLIU4 044AFUEUtlb.' 1511—Z5 PZ—AL1. CITY OF Ac B&- RAINCHO CUCAIVIONC .,A ii Tnu. PLANNING DIVISION F-XHInrc. \ .' -r,' Mk!,O W F--� v4i, L± N i i i'1 + .. SG IL • a _ -a mnoi�p tQ wkie -H A404A iv mer mczvl f-!- Er> G(ZA t.tl t J . T v AP-67 0 MO-AV;:I.Y-A • � i Nc:.�%a �; L•O�;Ec �,'' `,mil NN � ORTH r v kIA ( 1E-ti4,6D 6$-1 WAU4, RANCHO CUCANIO GA TrrceE.1&�:�f PLANNING Dl'%IMGN EXHIMT- SCALE: �it'as ~YV•rV �w4<t.r+W f ��a irwra�+ee4 V ^�Varw .��"w4.Tw: <a wW.,wm•°f LY.l'.3 w N Hill 7' o wesr' Eieoti .,�nr•..<r ,sr FcEVar�nnr rt i, /' i q �%RG.7 t+t Q^ �•. u .a.:,:e' /qk .W�L _= terse %t�� �I � y < aC - .ac1[we T9,gAISVER.SE S C7-'ON tibRTH CITY OF _ RAINCHO CUCAMONGA Trrm,��•�il.��ff���?' PLANNING DINT N FXHIMT- 6 FT A � 1 . NcnTU E.•�TfRTLON ..au- .ta -/4l, .s�"OLrrtJ ELCy,grlf]R .: � - E?ST ELEVRTION a «YGaag. r , j s' ��2a °..°.'.run.r.w�..rcs..rrar�+.cw ar.laue•! TFfar.'s. r� - rMT r G NORTH cinr OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONr, scr,ccf n,lo A�` rem spec Lhr CITY Or. RANCHO CUCAivlO 'GA rrrt.�, 1.� fii5- /I- PL.ANNIN Q�t tQ�t F- XHtpxr, i RE:SLTION EfO. A RESOI.UTIQN OF 'THE RANCHO CtiG1 0i:6A .i�F ?YNL CDWISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT, REVIEW NO. 86 -42 LICAVED ON THE FIRTH SIdE OF ARROW HIGHWAY BE14EEI WHITE OAK AVENUE AND MAPLE PLACE 11 THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT - APR 208- 351 -60, 61, 67 -70 WHEREAS, on -6e 31st day of December, 1986, a complete application was filed by 'bavid Leff for review of the above4escribed project; and WHEREAS, an the 25th dai,of Marcl„ 1987 Cle Rancho Cucamonga Planning j Commission held a meeting to consider the obove- described project. Now, THEREFORE, the Rancher Cucamanga P?arnning�A ommrission ruzolved -ps � follows: SECTION 1: That'tl;e fallowing carr' be met: 1. That the prapo4d 'Project, is conlii ;tent with the objectives of the General Plan; 2.' That the proposed use is 'in accord with the objective, of the Development Code and tl industrial Spc: *ific Purr and the purposes of the,fislzrict in F whfa t the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance Pith each of the applicable prov� 3i¢aa of tte level4iwment Code and the Industrial S; ec' IC Plan;:: and ' 4, That the proposed use, t6gether with the condition, applicable thereta, will not,-#e detrimental to the public health, safety, or o41faare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECT1C4 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts a the environmen ar. *'f'i'at a Negative Declaration is issued �on Marsh ?S, 1987. l 3: That Development Review No. 86 -42 is approved, subject to the folldW ng'rF -3—n itions and attached Standard Conditions 1pr �i Q701-02 o 3-25-87 PC Aq nda o APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH D'►Y OF MARCH, 1987. PLANNING C"ISSbDN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST; ra Buller, ` 6" putt' a ar�i y"" Resolution No. OR 86-.42. - LEFF March 25, 1987 Page 2. PLANNING DIVISION } 1. All landscaped areas shall be a minimum of 5 feet in !, width, unless they are adjacent to loading areas, in which feet ` casd�4 would then be acceptable. Whenever possible, landscaped aroas shall bet provided that will allow clusters of trees to be planted for best aesthetic effect. 2. The entries to the two -story buildings that face the parking lots shall receive textured pavement (brick paver) ' treatment and additional landscaping to produce a more aesthetic entry statement. 3. Pedestrian pathways that cross drive aisles shall be concrete, edged with brick pavers. 4. Provide speciticatiuits for 'Lunch court benches, tab7es,' chairs and trash receptacles, and provide sample of brick poers for Planning Division approval, prior to issuance of building permits. ENGINEERING DIVISION I. An in -lieu '10%, as contribution to t[to - future undergroundirg ti.-s' the existing overhead utilities (teiecommunicati,s and electrical) on the opposite side of Arrow Routa shail b_ paid to the City prior to issuance of building ;, wits,. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit .d »:ac!t29 times the length from the center of Maple Pliace to .i rr ..enter of Mte Oak Avenue. 2. A parcel map or lot line adjust3ent shall be recorded prior Im building permit issuance to eliminate lot lines that cross proposed building. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH D'►Y OF MARCH, 1987. PLANNING C"ISSbDN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST; ra Buller, ` 6" putt' a ar�i y"" Resolution tic-,, OR 86 -42 - L6T (larch 25, 1987 , Page 3 I. Brad Buller,' Deputy Secretary of the Planning Codgissioh of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that tha foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning i004ssion of the City of Rancho Cuca��,bnga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held ' on the 25trh day of- rch, 1987, by the fpllowi vole- to -wit: AYES: CQ ISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT- COMI�kIONERS: FAML Ip R ,1 MO G, t Y Yom+ yCOw qM4 a q qa+ ^..j > TN.O a �.iiu t a y NOC «dL. O.yOn`Y -4 fi t ^d iC ON a VX� 1-1 N t S 4 z z v:. -,, s yL Y cd YgG L Y V gU R VL c26 Z—.- ^G qn j C 28 Tu LQ V ov UG 2 `pY 1!4-3 Ypi�pQ G- U ■> 6y Lr~�O V �p 6Y Gwb CpM Y�L ^�...!TY M +..CVQ 4�U ^L! OL. ]ep� !Cl Yppg�YL ~dLN ^Y ^.CGYr dO�w L -3 7[w•,Y�q �"Fio IQip V �� • O - L �cYMa�`q •�3^ 404:s�r:CU ea1Ly e��u 8i wuw� ^ YdC�t'u p�+ u ^ w Yy V wp ■ N Y •CCM .! L jY }OA�V CGI Z.3 V gz a7Y S Nq �GN ^gT1 Mp p�Y C Cpt •O t5j� x n^ c p n q +00U i..�� NGk- y �OwtlVO N'Y$q NpGg �}` GL tlYO.. pgww9� ♦4'� ! <�" O Ys i '17=1 a, 9 YyL9w.p- O c GS Y w atsa ydU sy ®pi �La'{'� ^qp ^_ tN 9_p e { m>m m V . s j` 1 1 S �a o +{. a u° yU� �i rL a 3$.a ac who. -!i�s6 b^ V ¢L'. {{Syy !N Y U ■> OWN V Y�� iS O ? L -3 °y fiN 1p Y0Y1aY V �� • W Cct CY.� 0.0pp �"" f N� Pp�p Cali NYC � z N Y •CCM .! L jY }OA�V CGI Z.3 V gz a7Y S 1z °??ya- � oL u x n^ c p n q Nx.. +G •f.S L INLO•�.�gON NI O C q Is a3a°iro Rnaann annt O O S O� '1 yy� d Y a v e y n ,� a "O" V. n Y r� r = C � p IC �; A o'er -•r.3. "cw.v3 nra,�aoYr TN not R°:�... _ 3 ro a � p �aySwo " �� �T >`a iaa. anY as • m ,e4i wppbb°n ^^�'n �." rpn .ai ? a r.y G j o a: O'rM1yA A O NS n yY^ pp� e•_� RO OAA ¢.r Y'�'•.G.�e. n� p` O.R' y 1 ^�" rS06 w 44 a,a.M1� '6V.wrt `.�A� tia �rN � �Oy�IO �M1YO -yY T .1 �.nnr SA aN y3'J+ in� O3 prI �OOi i<�yi rM1� 0 Yip- Rvry�, 6{a 0 6 4 O pp���y ads b Q � 12yr i5 »�O.�NH:3 i�z.w nf+.9��a.O 6. `q •�1 P6C �A Olp 9 1y. C9 ty Mry C n�T ry4 e=an�$ `gig" °na ;� nsi � $$ at.— ar. Sm �. °9n r$...,e� n1n '4'o$u -+•w g°R� +� aA4in J S��V D4�np@n~3vo 'aca"an: ��yep aLT �`¢• a =N. 8 q NsCCS ryw qna a!;.. T ++ O - tta a. y $ gQj 1..1 'f ` 1 as tai M. �. 3. C ^M�'�� S.=r Ia')�^ �w� Y3.rM •.:� `"i �l¢a AMP r Y-R••Q F n u S 1 �q � 1eae�jj i j i i G 6 ay x a•'SY n' SR.* R• '@ f~0 a+ .C�,n. i-ai4 A% N11)a5A:OV. I� t ��� L'O btSj��i ! � '4�0 >wZ ~i � fln St�•1� 10 6 � � 09A �M i aap� aa..ti a +3 nc S n aQgK�« � �3 �n�mnb Y an. r�yw�"z ••3`r m °�a^ w3 '&B�S1 '.' 4as`Tn�� y.]1 �_ _ ��p/1 �wyy� wr s • ` d Spa Nr. Aw p i PA r�' 5hH 9 00 IV_ a-NBC. y aOiN� at NA »aYn S+en pR .�.. r 3nY �f (i gtl yQ -• »ic Jy n nas g'aaoU .TjM -�waN �i}�.. pS v �� a +m n3. n•�pa -�$'nra wwu�`�'a p.�S ^. 4 � IA � � V! n � A b 4gr O �t n W A � uri • � �S n � w �(O a eT a � 9J r � ° � Y xw* 2S - �cY 10wY� » a.°i`Y'.�a an ge1na �oa Al vi-A ft == g'aw 7i ?w n ..cN n nul�a�.p '•w unira °a. �i�i'ac m ^> OZ PIE � >•w �c i .`b`" i »�,n ^�< Q>•` o �''Pe one$ $gyE AftL as swan ■n u v�'si y?ys� b'° ij J66 �Q -'Nt, fSQ.. a< Yr.? tr V NZ 9 N o.K.. aeo.9. nwAq ^Ya 'IYR o n� c n z n •• a a.'. -f n S y N y M 0 N w n 'n n a. a e <o M1 n i mean -lei MA, i 0.4 1 3 t 3 ls 2L al NI Ax 15- 9;;.5a .74 .1b IMP Sib i R t :. 4" iz�-t 2, Z7 zN 0 5. al a . :3 4 ap_ 15 "Pa 02 : -V -1 —, S. F_'__ rd i S s I I PIS C% 45 Z 1. -Z Aa :ISE vt z! tjO.s 4n, "Va A a lwa !-;.S;l zh pi F 1-15 C ki; -N U iyyy al 1P, M gigan - 4 N m Gd cQ c MA, 0.4 1 3 t 3 ls 2L NI Ax 15- 9;;.5a .1b Sib i R t :. 4" iz�-t 2, Z7 CyYy a . :3 4 ap_ 15 02 : -V -1 —, 45 Z 1. -Z vt z! tjO.s 4n, "Va A a lwa F ki; -N U 1P, M N m. cQ c MA, O E i \ y Of N pp <^r �'y1 $� � eR n3� �.n� u7' nA � � $ 3N•8°h Z5� R r a a TSO. w`ms ; . N 35R p r r>§¢ l "N �°me= �e w T x0", tl AS rN 4> •f R r ° .• : up E ; �TN � $ i O � $d �q ° a n ^ pp•• �>Cr Amf P�� C n 3� Fda °A $ r ,k Zza z! 14; K l A -1 wab° 'a� if T , i •�c°n' ~S, -�• b{1.N L ii 7 A b L'e... '� i °1•Ge ��A n %iM rT.`l O� O On A� O!> R 4 0 G rt t T b Y N N K �C C C� K. „ i ` S. C C T •%~ S g$'' �." °,t' +� Wig,'.$ i.� a FM .Aron ti ^'� y� ISMS MSS$ w�E Ra AS`' ° `ApN °o a$2 oozi i °a a aa�R aka .�$ Nil sa of Wa R's OQ�Lm�f TIC 6N at1N A� ,�ri C6 TN1ppp „1,,,i 6Kp AIO: Iy� C4OGv ms L. $3,{r$ la` SCP R �O A n.6NVi pp py N .n aSN � Rem au Aa.A O•.Nt � vs y�9 �01 WfAtTq Tp .. wN A U nA�S.Y� y���•�n.eyt�Ow P �n� A a • A A A. yp•r • N r9 YM A6R 1•�1 4w S lI , M. {O RS Or qLr <N g Elf ■Aar Ary�•$►p� =T }tip• N2ew R_ 6A4 W R Y 4Z y O \: r4f,•.gp n6OS�� :i 'i•A Q$iSA�ps `IAN a6r pY r pNe K� .O. I'.r., @l �J�•, gR IfTI AwA A�nN �IT►S 0.A on °' ro�ryt¢r+ q+i�gin q� "mac yn�o�a ;J < Frig: �1.E- :%T - 'A1�. iOA :.~i � O•�� Trlr•nr w.�w < fAl g s ° A a°fa y� � � °,�A! �. lw4n '$r,2 rg° A'gan� nrN NE t S2r $g3$ i �' >. 'roif 5.r s'Ng• 3 < °O mvro Aw w ort5� sc� V- i �'�io . -d spin'°^ n� c .H9 vEwa Ur g RraT. :?I.a AK A wq o 1Q PIS * l=ae�x s.. ,•$ 'ptiw 1��4�n c.3 m a� •' �4, SSA fir. �.4 n,r3� R ._.'�no3 �1 QQpL �nA�R� A>—:� O O,N J• D•A °s. 3 r f! N TNw r w �CSr • 06. N �� M1 +�C 2��iyp N 'r tpA �Sf=i 'Of .AAA rip 6�W 6� 4Trf+ 4CNr SCR !S C.. n st 0 M pa tusi Ob E r�M L I O�Y Y�� O w Mal X On A Z. yy IL u Y = P Q. Y�N Pg�y+tlti« O v ti CR. r. a'Y� i!u_ a.N ;N ` =r S R tlSM pstlia�rj�� � N yy ■ u4V ���tl Q�PNCy� s.. CAA K a M CO C y`Y E T O w C wq• X On A Z. yy .t P ^G O v ti CR. r. a'Y� `° 8g S ca = u4V s.. • , g Az .AC O Vyvy v AVz Vz ■ � {y � C � tl. Z a. a d a � tl� � • Y His I 4yq 3 i itlA21¢� Y� 4 �^ q LC T'S: F e w N n 4 Yi W RY Keyy C aL p° L ey a �a ps C °p P4 tl +rk °dp ytl�L . N�Ni� Y6 4 n ^Yl ft �w M fYfg a ' ^1 A CO C C F� V A O w C wq• X On A Z. p p t_ . .t P ^G O v ti CR. r. a'Y� SES Ma n. u4V • , g Az .AC O Vyvy 4 ° u °�3 a.�i' 4� os S av�• q °Ny n'o' a4i aaL•'.D« 2.5 Fi7n'a' EO' cz «� CwL1 a y Y, Y C w�YON Y�4 ji-a.1. ° aurt ovm ;L�. y''4aq, V ,m DOAO �Y P6 Y■[ ^y E yAAGP _Nt p�n ^O�NO.N r. is° ^' It P C � Y HV O .3 ee' .iu a0p� LO. Y I V P4 ■ C3 y �.4pptlY� LC Cn Yufj.C� A p ~E �al gO.Y �4 OO44Y 1lf li�N p 1.9 1440 CI. M.044 OG +II+�Y iMO Gov W YY ?i 6 q._ua .1 MY r�� ytl Kp tyt.� o Y q'. Aa <C V 41 .4 ;1 lK ``i. +1 A '41 V N [* �udu aV. N$C `. qEL wN'• ° � � w '. 4aa Ly .: o• Fp ap�O� �'� Eat � NM ��°�- • A ¢� ^ all •�N !1L P Jg �' w.g M 3 Y L O .-IS u IRS CL TH m Eli— ot�� L l ��ko� a gr o.'•« �N xe +� €8 Ems OL �2n 6y p P y I ^Wi �°V! igY. "nd. p��LE6 w�. �i �J �^,•p e Q vOwN •� d9 r,e` dd« iv �'.` r'f «w`Cia $v` ` ~, � N� e•fI e Yv1t u u 6EC •• Y w^ i ac �J.. a^ �° r L� e$ o:: xi; ro` WF \ M u. . Vi; QyyO M �� ? � , �YY MN. ApGO Z -. iN 6.lNU 6S p p�p��Kq , 30• `YYiv �j� r eyC.yL zq ca '� Y Ya` =z BEd 6° as p $ N V -�a.. �w° aN�� Y G N � ti p M ` V ti '� • � O �� II 2 uri��r CyN °Y fC ;'•L �p •+.. aql�= ppY� Q4a4c Oe.- YyW rz, `y YYr°l Yu= + Y y V � U, s 6 V 6W w� S 6W pWp ice` `1� -aG I 0 7 +,t U .n C� S. -"� 5 P 'i a IFS eta $$� r. SZE r Ili a fir.. - N 3's 6M �� w a ^em u° a; yY R 4,`G '^-b R^ Y a'D Cy.6 •UeN A �.� nom. Vi �.N...s. Yee 14 1 4 n� L R6 G� H ppt w+ a �[ R A � Lw is Mr M r 0 bit t E Hz E da; sa a .'u+u ;--H a � Zia = 4 Ua � �4y �+Fr aia Y�I Y� �Ur Lv may. s$=s �. H ....fe�is',ai r�C isl ?E VA„ CR 31 .z,-. ,.PI s -1 C 1��i L vim. +v� Ir 9� x c#c p j�f 1d1�� a �yi C ��aR rd 6r Y�N.Y I+' It lW G.s• K I -"� 5 P 'i a IFS eta $$� r. SZE r Ili a fir.. - N 3's 6M �� w a ^em u° a; yY R 4,`G '^-b R^ Y a'D Cy.6 •UeN A �.� nom. Vi �.N...s. Yee 14 1 4 n� L R6 G� H ppt w+ a �[ R A � Lw is Mr M r 0 bit t E 59� a � a a � Zia = 4 Ua � Y�I N yR�B� ro x c#c p j�f a �yi e y rd c'4 !a 9 •e 6 Nw. ti j a L i 6 a« Y e m r-.- o -"� 5 P 'i a IFS eta $$� r. SZE r Ili a fir.. - N 3's 6M �� w a ^em u° a; yY R 4,`G '^-b R^ Y a'D Cy.6 •UeN A �.� nom. Vi �.N...s. Yee 14 1 4 n� L R6 G� H ppt w+ a �[ R A � Lw is Mr M r 0 bit t E Nor "0. IN DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA U3CAM STAFF REPORT 0 U March 25, 1987 1977 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Debra ►eier, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELLMENT REVIEW 86-45 - AJA - The review of a f—iv—e—T—ot Master Plan 57 15.59 acres anU develolment of lots 2 and 3 of the Master Plan. Lot 2 cons, �jsting of a 41,500 square foot industrial building on 2.35 acres and Lot 3 consisting of a 51,250 square foot industrial building on 2.77 acres of land all within the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), lccdted on the east side of Pittsburgh Avenue south of 6th Street- APN 229- 263 -3, 4. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a five lot Master Plan, along 'iiitfi Site Plan and Building Elevations of Lots 2 and 3. B. Sur,-canding Land Use and Zoninq: lqurtD - Existing industri—arTa-cilities; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 11 South - Vineyard; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 12 East - Vineyard; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 11 Mfsst - A master planned R & D complex, Phase, I under construction; Industrial Specific Pla�-A Subarea 12. C. General Plan Designations: r 'Poject Site - Industrial Park North - Geney,al Industrial South - Industrial Park East - General Industrial West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The majority of the site is still used as a —vineyara, the vineyards will remain i!-til each lot is developed. Directly across Pittsburgh Avoo'.' " is the Bixby Ranch Master Plan with Phase I under construction. Curb and gutter exist on Pittsburgh, and parkway developement will occur with the developement of each lot of the Master Plan. ITCH R PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 86 -45 - AJA March 25, 1987 _ ` Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: No. Of No. Of Type of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Use Fo INe Ratio Required Provided Lot 2 Office 4,260 1/250 17 Manufacturing 12,730 1/500 26 Warehouse 24,460 1 /1000 1st 20,000 sf 22 1/2000 2nd 20,000 sf Total 65 97 Lot 3 Office 5,350 1/250 21 Manufacturing 16,050 1/500 32 Warehc-ce 29,850 111000 1st 20,000 sf 25 112000 2nd 204000 sr Total 78 107 II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The Master Plan area consists of five lots along the east `i7i a of Pittsburgh Avenue south of 6th Street. Lot 1 is currently under construction with a 58,500 square foot industrial building. Lots 2 and 3 are being reviewed for approval with this application while Lots 4 and 5 are intended for future development and will be reviewed and approved through future development review applications. The eastern boundary of the Master Plan will become the border between the Industrial Park District "Subarea 12" and the General Industrial District "Subarea 11". PLANNING COMMISCION STAFF REPORT DR 06 -45 - /WA March 25, 1987 k Page 3 I] ` B. Desi n Review Committee: The Committee, (Chitiea Buller) initially reviewed he project on February, 19, 1987, nF�ing the following concerns -, 1. Lunch courts should be provided with appropriate amenities and should be separated and distinct from the entry plazas. 2. The Committee expressed a concern that certain driveways entrys lacked any kind of interest or statement while others are unbalanced with large statements on only one side. 3. Variation in the vertical building plane would be desirable, ;out should be compatible with concept of �'- the Bixby Master Plan which is presently under construction on the west side of Pittsburgh. 4. The master planning of this .parcel should focus on the Pittsburgh strtieetscape, in particular, variation in building setb cX parkway desigrr -compatible with the Bixby Master Plan concept. 5. The eastern portion of this block is �_;ignated a General Industrial District (Subarea 11) and should be Master Planned at some future date. However, the 1 subarea boundary line should be a prolongation of the east property line of Lot 1 southerly to the proposed street and shared access should be provided from the proposed street between the two subareas at Lot 5. The folly ng revisions to the project were later reviewed and approved by the Committee on March 5, 1987: 1. Lu.,,,,- courts are provided that will include shade tres and appropriate handscape amenities. 2. Project entrys have been re- orientated, clustering entry plazas separate from loading zones and clipping the building corners at less prominent entrys for landscape nodes. 3. Variation to the streetscape is provided by bringing buildings on Lots 3 and 5 closer to the street frontage. I] March 25, 1987 'J Page 4 IC. Technical :view Committee: The Technical Review Committee has rex ewe � r a`�'"d teratined that it is censi� tent with applicaute standards and ort�inances. D, Environmeeski, �Ass,essment E-p6n review of Part I of the Initial 3i ani�art 2 of the Environmental Checklist, staff has' end no signifiMt impacts related to the development of the proposed Master plan. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS. This project is consistent with the Indus ,*rial spwflc plan an the General -Plan. 11w. pro4ect will not be detrimental to the adjacent propert %es or C,,use significant environmental impacts. r.r} addition, the proposed site plan and building design, together with the recommended conditions are in compl`,ance with the Industrial Area Specific Tian and City S'tah4rds. IV.. RECOMMENDATION.* Staff recommends approval of Development Review { 0 -4b 't4rQu9ft t"W WOW= of the attached Resolution and CondfUMS of Approval and issuance Of a Negative Declaration. Res t €ol iy .�.�" Brad Bu er City Planner BB.DM :sgr Attachments: Exhibit "i4" < Location Map Exhibit ''B" - Master Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Enlarged Details Exhibit "E" .. Site Plan tot Lots 2 and 3 Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations Lot 2 Exhibit "G" - Building Elevations Lot 3 Resolution of Approval with Conditions 6 El X3 N jlF CITY Of. RANCHO CUCA2vjONGjk PLANNING DIVM,4 I -j NORTH r r ru\ i - 0 C Ove" - A5 TrrLF.-4A!4- � WAP EXH513M, SCALD zr TAEII"T*N BI.Ofi 9F. P/j�(NO lAlA`..wu� f 1 flfAlOV M fa niroV. SNK /� Z s ae>aea fw •o> >osnv. a >t.�e 1 a>.�war >fs fff f��x>It. as �c To fw 11.1 -0.1aw .c CITY or PLANNING DiVISn.N SC iLC. e t[, J LEGEND THEME rag_g A EVERGREE`7 TREES Jf' "IMF 3= �JNi7f..O JE= DROUGHT iOLERRN, ' FLOYfZAINO OROUNO:;OV =❑ JEV.a ^ ACGFE.ENTT FLANT PALETT[ g M1$�Q,2DNE SPEGIwN ,wtl1M �� 4Q(CiouoUm ACCENT TREE PCANTfkG �� �$L�4R`, N�_J�i4?,E„pT THEE pC^ANi�11�. �RE €Tr E( PLANTING VERTICAL ACCENT TUTEE PCANTfNG V�NCAT DN 4Nk 1 FNTINO ,•POUND CUYEN ►IA�NTINO � wwa Rid =I i rn 1 No trT H CITY CAF iTL ,t: ' RANCHO R-7 (' - -- - -- ' � 'ice Q(m �• r ENTRY .\ V NORTH RANCHO C CA'IvloNGA -nTLE Oo- ►� c am` PLANNING DINIGO.N r� I a l el,07 ! T a TABULATION J - GROSS$fTEAREA BLt . 'j'a G sr t:l AU NET SRE AREA AYtl9 a:f PAfw vix •f ACt ��� ~��on�cw a-ma AREA -v l,a,U s�A,s is 4x •U VE MAR. AREA ilf ssY�,V ,x,xx,LPy.�U ; LANCSCAVE AREA �Y ff IyU Affx�IHU _ WRCSCAEEANEA 9U[bb•,, AREA v, AREA •a,p. } u��E uh,aal. ryl�ms PfU � pss WARNUCACTWN61 fa„ iNP M ii�4'AOY y 1 ,Z,HOOSE .�.ii� a, xx TOTAL ,. v u sa s sux sr N lax YI07E: y10 EfOdiNl AERUSOTCR'ES ALL EAISTNO UTE.fOES 8`lOW GRADE NORTH CITY OF rre \[. ° RANCHO CU DVIO\GA .9 j2A8Z PLANNING DI`'ISION F- XHIMT.- AC.._ _ SC.ALC. -. r WRTH 1 � EAST cads, �� _._..,. -�! - � —�_._• iaiia�a�ar I SC.TH WEST SLU6.2 c V O RTH CITY OF rrtb�t: p,'v° R- -iif'CHO ' -' ANIO GA mTu: - � PLANNING D[t'LS N 11Himr. _ LE7 -lG G f ( SOUTH t � r EAST .. .NORTH LIM ' WEST CITY OF. RAINCHO CUCA'I'vlo 'GA PLANNING DI` I tiON L 1O)RTH TITLE: E x tti�tr: . SCALD A RESOLUTION NQ> A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO. CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -45 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PITTSBURGH AVENUE SOUTH OF 6TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT APN 229- 263 -3, 4. WHEREAS, on the 14th day of January, 1987, a complete application was filed by Gilbert Aja and Associates for review of the 'i�bove- described project; and NHEREAS, on the 25th day of March, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meetir.3 to consider the above- deser_,ibed project. NOW, THEREFORE, the'Ran:tho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: - SECTION 1: That the fot,4owiag can be met: r, 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Phan; and _ 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code an& the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is loca'=and 3. That the proposed use is in compliai:ce with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Specific Plan; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will _riot be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially 1 injurious to properties or improvements in "the vicinity. SECTION 2 That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment�an —that a Negative DecTaration is issued on Marcie 25, 1987. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 86 -45 is approved sgbject to the Follow n—g co—nffitions and attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division Master Plan: 1. The Master Site and landscape plans are approved in concept only. Development of each lot shall require separate Development Review application and approval. �� f� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR 86-45 - AJa March 25, 1987 Page 2 2. The subarea boundary line between Subarea 11 and 12 shall be a prolongation of the east property life of Lot 1 to the proposed street. Therefore, a lot line adjustment is necessary for t;ie southern portion of the existing property tine. The lot line adjustment shall be accomplished prior to issuance of Wilding permits. Lots 2 and 3: 3. Pedestrian amenities such as raised seating, benches, planters and Doter appropriate street furniture shall be provided within plaza 'areas. Details shall be provided on final landscape plans and submitted for Planning Division approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The lunch courts shall be screened from loading and trucking activity by use of low profile culls or shrubs. Engineering Division 1. The propose -' east /west street located' at the south property 11tye shall be constructed as a standard half- width street with a,-mininKm 26 foot pavement width within a 40 foot dedication. 2. The missing street improvements .along Pittsburgh and the proposed east /west street may be deferred until development of the adjacent frontage if secured by .a lien agreement. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: 9. David ar er, a rman ATTEST: —TrFaWTUT.er, Depuq Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: db NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Q 2 F i_ /J •aW YCLV tln..,,.. -oA° a.n c$�.r`. oA' SA �i, f'.un'e, u. -into o«c..in on. n �. � � �.. ip p S'Z D6L'^.p t i^ ~°mow» FQa4a LyLL�ry�q usey1 I E E 1 b qG.. epE H OwV°u✓ tlTM La q6g. pHG ° >L(N tlp ��qMYYM yf �GLN �tl 1 r g O Cu O.Yt qbCd M wW ` V'Ld� 4 i �yy ° gyOpLY '.~~��$.. 4F � p} , `Gfi�uC.V yT!"Q�' .Y HfiY ' .. = E~. � ut Y Lty Gz as 2_ Q2 .Es yO= —XI V tly yw3 VOO T :. G G �yf1 YG k0. _YYO Gt�M V Z`' C AGW«_ li .GViV pLtlG �pp�pff t1,�,3� iw�1 Y6N.. 2�aa N ^O �aa 1pH W ^+p =yC` nb�Y� ":,GC�44� Y G, Y COy Ge°.YA�Gy�. N y i l L W B rat M yi oL. =•-�.� ®f�'.°._. n °a ,g rau m a+$ d.M. ML GW _SW� �r y _ �${ pp $eie °u� wGJ°� aeG t�L "ao4 nY C y < t� ii 6st�ai� rHWrLrMr�� V Yt` 4tl, ( f tl yU1 aOO �apC� 6e��� qc¢ p. it r {�{..DfJNY.�.�Y-=.�n r�.{Ji,. CG� �pC 1Y�'YCCCCC °� yyW ticJ V� yY,C pnO.Ay rW an�. `T 414n�2.W1a�,.- i'�p� K 4L {� @",.. YnI aAi b I i L 6th I s W O O u E'nL icy a i o w o gy G R y M. v _vv � ��y t r �� •w N `- yy�� YY11 9L N dG 4 NS V Or Q Y G L tl � G tYj$ N.. rn .si C i7 ^yam` 7 . � Ng` ig aqr 1 [ i (f rV' G 2 u U Q. «sc ir+c +a ca m IS Uz o�NOaµ H � i <.f `49� C.T N. �LLA��4�Y LNN I SriaN� Ogd9y.Ar YO^ cen «. �� ^e sa°.s iii nv,; uto a=NiA �h9 Ec N!... N: «�� y v q oo N a 'li$i N V V • Vy OA�� L^ �fyy N q g° n ate ip. NOC 4y'O ^n N�y N >g���N ECd YOY d u Yap'vC N,ay. Sy' _ C'e,+� ;Si C�G^ l GV~ �$�'�r��LY A25 �SM i0 01^ Q AWj •vCM°N VA�r Mg V^ s�y�Yi yd�Cg$ �v�t!.u'aS ndcacp YYLS t O+'E < M6R OC NYY� Si�K'Nr'�7'E +s'Ssi. m �vT N H N G Y n a€ Sys y�. '� d qya pCLc it + GS L O .V Nr dr p At L O 6S` y r u "2 ri ^Y ^V YaNL �CL AS ^Vy1R Sd M' N C_YV°i Y.= qq�jN adi�C � �YMy. °C �L._V Qr Y �t " w�^ AT eerr n Yap° > � , ^Yp .O i' LfzLO Nc d�u Eli C �r:.O ■ �' L` y`= 'y C� EytC yaNV ^ V V Y Q> °^ u O VM C v ■9v° OrC C d Ell C O S N S °z'i'nc NC = /�LNO «Na Y.QC N a'L <Y Vic. JM O C L i DC Y H d �Vp P Y N T, J6 'YLO9 �cV yOOS w•. �` YYi 2eOp >si p YNL�� C� =�' ,«CN Y Oi�Y�Afi C` MM y O Ni ^ O �4ru6� uc �Cdw � �NC� Nw L °yr� dyNYY a� �LEY> p��C dKil 97 V �' S Y. q p. Vw OQQp S LCp yMa E.-iiy NE V> s + ac C I_. o ++ Cp pLp p� �YSSE WSf) 'I LL 23 N6 NI of �T N `LYqN d ev!xn �n P.2 e O VC� O y +N 4Q N N OC N G wS > y C L i Yif d • � MtC�"YYM ii I sia a edm n« _qqu pp o Y9C G 01E 9 6 w O.O S w ~ V ^' IswC:J:4yY w M up O Vr upNN.F o�,,ccA dcN CNC q N O MCC 8 ~ N 4 SAZH as LpO �Lq A nc a pe {a FY 'b Y w Y C Gy i V �raY NG�J arV <6L 1 OKI s ? •J aCO w+ ro t3� rt oCO.}d}Cz viui la"+ °ark M c tiupvLY i.yy.Q 1 aDUY gG"Stl 23 O• 4... h Rm NA �x CC 9Yq 44Y ��pCC�� Y. �ioo� MC.6 GYYT� � 4T.wdy M L. E =Y� Y Y S Y. w1 UU�� 2 - L.d 1IC f C6l :-; YCI"2�aCONCNC M 4 , E` yut 4�qN �.0 Ox 4 GMa 5 p sY Vq4 b4Y NaY.r09 y�y��cc NQgrV Y ^ bYNayae\S �M -- �. u�qN' NY �.♦� Ya' y YCQq�epq y�V Y _�� >r Cq.�O�V=K ~�M� M ONa+Y YR Vr �����L. w C N � L 9L'a�� yY. «Y ywL � �i U �a�{�N `O� �N. ♦+N� �"rC' �6N O.V••OK'� Hess I11,' 4. 4 oVLC IYR asp Y3Y "^ ♦ liNtl 1n N A+ r p Tyr N �Nfl� sYY . N mow+ 04 KN LaN rA� N >4} o YN wSVY ; YYOa�CY Ya QyM .'� NA 6 aY 1T�C JQ OM M� i\ ~C ,T U R` �_ 4 gt 1�E W YGL?6dGG NN�.Y y•L .02 � RI: Lq N :;4!:; O.Y L % A V --t r Y N iNN YpY MC�.w S s at T+� Q �4jYM y3 V jh YN 'dam'^ ♦ YyyM N !7 ��fy! �� R�y6 .G Y� wy�6 HI*NMpY ���Y �a1 �+r�.0 ♦Y• MY, Y6 M 9q G pYY yS`.Y tl0.. =r QL 4µ :b0 CAM Fn1 NCV GM�� j,�CS yJ 4fW its Ray' ri r. }M p •�uw w. C.f.��Lw�6. 1,� w py� r�L: QV '1��y C tltl pYC L NON MW� KM 3.N0 \ \I�H.0 �N r?r�01Y 01 M�a i�7 C�GV ^O�. <. CV IrLY 6�0Y1.. o i -1.2 a Sty Yw N ~�C ♦ 9Y 1i of O V 01r Cn.. N�1 CF CRY 24% =gO�M _ ¢CZ yQ�f�. N r ai y. se LQSyO f.. yrr• — y ��is777 by> LC O �q y oiy LYVz C xB. 7E nK� "w �^ 6 ++N � o+e. o.« Y Ns � ■ Qy aQy3 a�Mp w hN°' 1i w etyN «. "o�a v �p E uBi am iw tf.3 AI— vC'rC`oaQtl OY +O�Y ,..F 9-. LaIi«'gs`.,~Vb$ t '}1Y. 4�i J V.�n~O�•]✓ -1 Ly'Q rL. `tl p G CL�tl Y 4gt. GC __ LQ 4� q Y ZZ q„`:O� °C p,1 �/1 N �yx y=yy. V �Y BWpwcs L9 5Z. N �C N C y4q �Y M Lc N L O Y O ?CNSY u'C r' NKMV p rO >MWO �Q �pY p�p,,a.�.�N.. wLYz 4., sY.WG Vy1y4y qii +msss 6. q0 NN..C^yi 01` CMww ill N4 �O.w iela -� DI Op ECt q +Y9 JYO Ytia 10^ V a-" C7 I- y -0.��. C 4CM� y.qr.� VA �'y +�: t■� �. as~ Gy 19 OwY M H CAY U�UV tl�.� A =} L}Y io H. ►y Y� M d0 ti` �s VwwOd ♦YN ^�L L. 6 YL. CYY�O 11.. K «n'8 tR.4m } CQN N6N 4C/ ib HOK�4 'C }' YrrN00 i 1` a •n 0. �¢ a' K r� Y C a €ip .�e•?p ^ N o do • iiii r b n or G id.' _2 4- ' F q L j Y C IL CL� p�u°M qY °� w yu L uw + 1� ii rYi m�r LO�C � i�t °L� �bC +Dyl i�] ° 44N�� CO Ai� +iact,�M{ a.W� L• SEgMi y��� 2V1�i�� r�j�T C u� •1�i+M` °pK pr Liga +i�u+� i�`N '$;r` fy. Y6 ■,wp°.'tU uGitl 9C 0� 4�L0g `C� N 1 4�pN1 rG. Yy ^L u.LYeIzcx.Y •�w��. A �C+rac'i.. ::� d :. ^p. alb 4S ier tN .i ^�pU ��, i t =f ZjCaC �,a� Y tl�4 �lzY Evil v Sp"n j.YY O. VCS MMy+ Y Y Oty ° ��iJY I�SY�y NU Z-Plli d— d �j m S W n S Mb A ra. .°.rY Mp 00 viip V Y'0Y Ao�.Y �p4Y AC c�c.C� C. q a Zia ?el Ell i �� °p p`Y a 'coo •$u� � MrS� .� as aqm�e> �V um° LY gv = men' aLY . '�('+�� •"gui. W�C�• ~~� V.Vi CuY9C d ,����•_ YiLt C y �ng Y wLC C VM NVp� y.° a�u ^Ye_L. qr OM ^. N C O +La vE 6 Y :'xiw w Oa 6Y �L +6 $a C r3 rf Aso ap g +j .. 01 y 9 p i 60� ¢ qwp. Da Yi gy@ip M� bwy l p..b cj9. arq�,a bar M.MCy ..$ � '40� psp°.^ „ M, e�u °• �. ^°r u. x�N..t 'M'a tp dYqi W CN LYa ifa4� Y Yq�Vq.C� O(�p{My V^ N� �y++ y` � L� Mme' Y O L q+ j O ggp Mo•,.. NM sue+ ,,..e= < �: °q� e,L3 `°�uM�`'a �j ,�$ a: �r�rs, VL R-17 11 c7 I i •rv� ' °ri E 0 IV% -1 �µ x�� 9 Y M ti Y V ~~ N z 9, V yrti III CQ H� L Ala �g YYw +��� iti S $� € 5f a g Nall 3 � 'j� a d r yy L` O�l � `~ � � �v� Y � $•at + 1y i�1 O r FOR ■ G 9 �NG° � +�^ it -04 �3qg tai Rp seV Iai�_.4: i 4.ay+e Obi q�'y9R. �OH _ pa •A• C uY�O•.�. N �D its', 5Ye C td C' N� MN +a • iO, Y}4 t� � , .DY Pa yr i 6y '•K. N3 Q 4P .3 ♦ON siT qOw Z. Z� 9�GH . URN Kfib ONL CV � � tr C W L ^ ` ss 4j 4 �y Y � JA �.� "same g 4 V yrti III CQ H� L Ala �g YYw +��� iti S $� € 5f a g Nall 3 � 'j� a d r yy L` O�l � `~ � � �v� Y � $•at + 1y i�1 O r FOR ■ G 9 �NG° � +�^ it -04 �3qg tai Rp seV Iai�_.4: i 4.ay+e Obi q�'y9R. �OH _ pa •A• C uY�O•.�. N �D its', 5Ye C td C' N� MN +a • iO, Y}4 t� � , .DY Pa yr i 6y '•K. N3 Q 4P .3 ♦ON siT qOw Z. Z� 9�GH . URN go O r ' �•�+ ,,,$ + xti .5Y !$u6O$ 3 "dam 'S Y i N i `ya pp� s b gC yOy, V L iM NaAi y ¢' y44 dux Vg� « 42-0 let .2 ilk jig 1; uVysgw 1yE Y -31 �_ �b •,L 4°: Y Y 1VC �Y • 16 i.�i4 1 C te?3�r� M� ova.' +SU �o° t u 3si' a° LLii $St.�8 vyS C4 1 I+N 4EY !0M `N au v t_. TR u _ K 01 ` + �g ii �J� YggQ `� >YN -Yy VT;d !f2 rgFeXu�oC° alleY Y Uai i t, Ij Y Z �Er 1 , E S ° 'rlti p ¢c L V LZ .lit �pY r _Z•M d V ?Y GY a C v� Q gCYI s .� 9��yl mg °ale .. ° =u �us S 4 f�C w` r wa o rr °N.C�°�, • 4 eM $ Y iaN. Etr.°..0 e N+a f. SS — M .$ teoa�=,• a 2. w Y O.0 S 4 � o,�T'Q az +•L • i JD- a4 gr_Y� yp 3 4 C L V M 1. Nr aw.. 4W 41• ![_ >N.Y.0 r 1 � L6 f0 A 2Q rr .. S ° 'rlti p ¢c L V LZ V�.4 9��yl mg P6 ° =u �us S f�C w` r wa o rr °N.C�°�, • 4 eM $ Y iaN. Etr.°..0 e — M O.0 S 4 � a.t ! I tY 3x_r JD- a4 gr_Y� yp 3 4 C L YQy M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 01�CnAgo STAFF REPORT owe d t m �a o � iz DATE: Mcrch 26, 1987 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Prad Buller, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, Assistant Pinner SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REVIEW 66:76 - GREENVIEW ESTATES - A 1 WM- s ei�ry determ na ton between a o4 1 orridor laterim Policies and a proposed development of 142 townhome units on 11.86 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units /acre) located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue a APR 207- 201 -30, 4% 43. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting a determination, of consistency—, "with the Foothill Corridor I1.terim Policies. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonings or acdnr; General Commercial South Existing Mobile Home Park; Low - Medium Residential (4- 8 dwelling units /acre) East Existing�Mobile Home Park; Low- Medium Residential (4- 8 dr:allinl units /acre) West Existing Townhomes; Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units /acre) C. General Plan Designations: roaec Site - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units /acre) North - Commercial South - Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units /acre) East Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units /acre) West Meditaa Residential (8 -14 dwelling units /acre) D. Site Characteristics: The subject *te slopes gently at approximate I y percent northwest to southeast across the site. There is a grade differential that varies between three to twelve feet along Foothill Boulevard and the project site. An existing single family ft me and several small accessory build(ngs occupy the site. Surrounding the house is a smaltl citrus orchard and several large shade trees of various sizes' and species. The remaining portion is covered with native shrubs and grasses. ITEM S PLANi4�5�UWI. fU,:STAFF REPORT PR, 86-76 - EW ESTATES MarCh 26, o8FIRF Page 2 II. ANWISIS'; The applicant proposesl-�o build 1Q i6wnhowes �Jtuatjd arounrA—n internal Uop road system with motor courts taking, access off the loop road system. Theie is a central open spa�e�spine that me eanders throughout the site with �peditteizn connections ard linkages allowi,ng equal acces3 Wthe mtral open space area.�Jfie architectural vocabul,�ary of the project reflects spanish-!�tyle, buildings constructed with textured stucco, aluminum windows and mission tile roof. Also,, Vie ar6hiticture features garages 'tucked underneath the buildings and provis4ons for' prfyfte open space. The Foothill,"Boule�vard, Interiii PoUcies ;,ate interided as :d W-9n lines for deveT-4 along Foothill-,during the preparation of guide ��4 theFoethil V CoMoJ The Intent 4 is,to. provide direction to the applicant and V �during the revieo process and avoid undue time delays and 6x*Aditures. Tlw-. ovoprail goal for Foothill Boulevard is to establfsh a high quality, attractive and unifying _m design th_g e reflective of the community's heritage, and provide a viable se';zIng for a balanced mixture of residential and commercial activities with safe aP4 efficient traffic circulation access. Bas6d on this goal, the following irearim policies are applicable: P�;Ilfcy I Architecture The arvhiftcture 61' new construction sha-.Il be r sensitive to the he itage of Rancho Cucamenga and r1late to nearby structures of comwj ty ?.ignificance. MOO OtMents w4y include, but are not linfted to. river rack/fieldstorm walls, exposed beawa;rk, �Arve arbors curved parapet Wls, and covered w4lbays or arviades. Coment: I oe a Mtectural program features spanish-style elevaiGs that are compatible with the winery heritage of Rancho Cucamonga. �,"-Aspects of the design elevations will require refinement during the devilopment review process, such as the side elevations which face Foothill Boulevard, These elevations should reflect toore articulation along the buildings plane in terms of stucco detailing, roof brows, gabled ends, exposed 6eam worll�, or vine arbors,, k PLAN9iNG 'CUPg+1I!SS H, STAFF REPORT I' PR,86- 6 - GREENYYEW ESTATES March 25, 1987 Page 3 - Policy 2 Pedestrian Orientation` Site planning, including building orientation }an4 parking lot, confi,guraticki, shall enhance pedestrian connections on - and -aff -site. A continuous pedaestriat�sysem is required in all new projects with connections bet*w buildings, parking areas, stmt adjacent sidewalks and transit stops. Amenities shall be provided such as plazas, shaded seating: alcoves, expumied lbckYs with Weface treatment, aexturized across dries,;• aisles, raised pavement planters, trash receptacles, ai °drinking fountains.. In addition, outdoor eating areas are encouraged. a± ' Cement: The project proposal features a central open Space spine which eaeanders throughout the site and a sidewalk systeae that links unite with open space. All linkages tb-at cross circuiation aisles r, will' featare texturi2dtt surface. - fir_eatment. In addition, pedestrian orientation is further :} enhanced by providing several sidewalk connections from public walkway into the project. Policy 3 Landscaping and Streetscape Design Landscaping shall be designed to create *.d stwl intiresf and variety to the streetscape, dance ! building architecture,, buffer ;, views of automobiles,'scre.A utilities and service areas. and distinguish pedestrian spaces from vehicular areas. Stresfiscape design eleients for all new projects shall be coordinated for ssnsistency with the guidelines for Foothill Boulevard in effect at the time of development, including intensified landscaping with specimen size trees, berming, and meandering sidewalks. In addition, stre°t furniture and alluvial rockscape and wxwment signs may be required where appranrfite.: Coment; The project will provide an additional tei feet of landscaping area along Foothill Boulevard in order ' to enhance the streetscape an4 provide dense streetscape landscaping and opportunity for specimen size trees, terming and meandering sidewalk along Foothill Boulevard. This will enhance building drehitecture and buffer views of parking areas. `� PLANWNG GDM tSSLC S'. PORT'. PR 86 -36 -• GREEtd 1V &IXr ES >, March 26, 1987 Page 4 f TI ,WENDATTON, 1t is recomended that the Planning Ct ission ' ermine zgdz the proposed project is )consistent with the goals and policies of the Foothill Corridor and direct the Applicant to h" proceed with a formal review application. Resp t €idly su tted - Brad ller City Pla fior 5 Attachmt-8tsv Exhibit "A" - Locat ;on Map Exhibit "B" - Study'Area Boundary Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations "E" Exhibit - Conceptual Landscaping Plan i "I I 4 � ' OP r t ;r "Y At6 L! m ` CSS � OF Z' .. =M '. r G GG Gc MH p . ✓ FG LM MO L. 1 `.: 'L - T EA r L vaxrn CITY OF S- A kel-, . fxT( ^{ 1' l.. k. '� L� lJa{ �.� vim• CITY OF - Foothill Y� lTEV Corridor�Interim Poll S F�A1�C t �� � ICfXGA TITLE- Study Area Boundary PLANNING DINrLIoN EYI IIGt T s�i if uI((ff L9� CITY or- RANCHO C4CAi-VIONGA Tall PLANNING DINT ;. j, �, , ExtilmTt r 11 CITY OF RANCHO C!UCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1987 TO: Chairman and-3embers,,of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT! INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS SUBAREA 8 I. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: CA�tp�9 ! n CC . Q C� F Z 1977 In September of 1986 :,the City Council adopted extensive amendments to the Industrial Specific Plan (ISP), as recommended by the Planning Commission. During Council review, concern was voiced over the expansion of Subarea 8 (General Industrial) into portion of Subarea 9 (Minimum Impact Heavy Indur` _'al), adjacent to the I -15 Freeway, The concerns related to passible loss of employment potential due- -to the subarea boundary change and resultant heavy industrial use--! imitations, and also potential negative views of outdoor storage and activity arras 0 authorized uses from the freeway. The Council approved the ISP amendments, but requested that Subarea 8 adjacent to the I -15 Freeway be aaditionaliy reviewed for these concerns. The City Council desired that the issue be brought before the Chamber of C=;erce for their analysis and input. During the first ^part of this year, the Chamber's Economic Development Committee considered the recently adopted amendments- and found them to be appropriate. In its review, the d6kiittee wished to ensure that storage and warehousing continue to be allowed in this area at least as an interim use. Further, the Committee recommended that a "Lime of sight analysis should be required for each use located adjacent to this freeway, to be conducted from the western most travel lane of the freeway ". This policy would hopefully ensure that any storage / warehousing operation is appropriately screened from the public view. Staff concurs with the views of the Charrber in support of the existing ISP provisions as recently amended and we further agree with the "line of sight" provision as suggested. ITEM 7 l PLAN}l C TOE' STWF REPORT INDtlSWAL SPECIFIC PLAN AmEMDmEmTS .', SUBAREA 8 March 25, 1487 Page 2 II. REC NDATION: It is Pecommended that the Planning Commission determine that tha existing ISP provisions for Subarea 8 are appropriate for development a1mg the I -15 Freeway. Further, it is recommended that the Manning- Commission authorixe�, staff to request "'line of sight studirs from the frectay as sugle'sted by the Chamber for all developments in Subarea 8 adjacent to the I -15 Freeway. Phis can be a matter of Co fission policy, and no amendwient to ti ISp is required. These recommendation4 should be forwarded to the City Council for its consideration. Respectfully itt , ti IS 8u ler i City Planner .j BB:AWste Attachments: Subarea 8 Development Standards Letter From`Economic Development ComAittee s -, T El 1, v IV-53 1-3 Jill i 0 0 1g� f � �,/ IV -54 SUBAREA 8 j ' Land Use Designation General Industrial Primary Function This rea functions to provide for General Industrial aetivi`ies and to assure for a trains. area from the Heavy *ndustrial category located north of this YJ subarea. North of Arrow and west of Milliken., the industrial L uses should be allowed to continue and expand with all service according to the development standards of the plan. Subarea 8r�extends north of Arrow approximately .14011' east of Cleveland to the east Plan boundary including a` portion south "'of Arrow along the eastern plan boundary. ; Permitted Uses Custo..Mansfacturing Light Manufacturing Research' ervi ces Public St age s / Light Wholesale, Storage, and V+stributior- Medium Whol? °gale, Storage and Distribution Agricultural %Nursery Supplies and Services Automotive /Light Truck Repair -Minor Automotive /Truck Repair -Major Building Contractor's Offdtes and Xardis 801 ding Maintenance Services Building Supplies and Light Egrripment.Sales Business.Supply Retail Sales and Services Business Support Services Communication Services Eating and Drinking Establishments Laundry Services Recrei ion Facilities Repair Services - Administrative Civic Services r Flood. Control /Utility Corridor Conditional Uses Medium Manufacturing Administrative and Office Professional /Design Services Animal Care Automotive Fleet Storage Automotive Rental /Leasing,. ; v Station' Automotive Service 5 Convenience Sales and Services Entertainment Fast Food Sales Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services Food and Beverage Sales Heavy Equipment Sales and Rentals Medicalt�,Vealth Care Services f Personal Services �,/ IV -54 SU'; {REA 8 (Continued) Petroleum-Products Storage Publ is Aittembly Public,'tafety and Utility Services Religions Ar3 em51y' Access and Circulation 1 120'- Right -Of -Way - Day Creek 8oulevird Milliken t sa• +r •r +a• sa• � sr ,r rr _. 130 ti. NOW 1 4 1001 Right -0f -Way - Arrow (No median on Arrow) Etiwanda •; r Rochester NOISIER 7- kt, Ina I �► i+au I u• 1 14.1 88' Right -Of -Way - Jersey ss sa• +a u• +a +a' +: 44 it. f IV -55 T5 SUBAREA iConinued} p 66' Right- Of-Waj -'All other Local Streets 6a it. R my Minimum Parcel Size ON-Half (1/2) acre Setback Requirements Average I {Measured frait ulti- Landscaping Parking Building :sate face of curb) Bay Creek Blvd. 451 251 451 Milliken 461 25' 45 ' Arrow 45 26° 46 ° Rochester 45' 25' 45' \� Etiwanda 4'5' 25° 45' Jersey 36' 20' 35`' All ath6r „' Locai 26' 1661 ZA' Streets Candscapin' RAqufrements 12% of net lot area . € Performance Star 4rds Noise: The maxi mm allowable noise level of any use NUT not exceed 75 Cdn as measured at the lot line of the lot 4.ontaining the use. Where a use occupies_a lot abutting residentially zoned land, the noise <4exel shall not axceed 66 Ldn as measured at the coffin tot line. Noise caused by motor vehicles and trains are exempted frosa this standard'. Vibration: X111 asses shall be operated so ats. not to generate vibration Lilscernible without instruments by the average persons bt and the lot upon which the source As located. Vibration caused motor vehiclis, train.,. pry temporary construction o% demolition is exempted from this standard. IV-55 Access and Circulation SUBAREA 8 (Continued) Petroleum Products Storage. Pablic Assembly 'Oublic Safety and Utility Services hz,gious Assembly 120' Right -nf -Way - Day Creek Boulevard Milliken 100' Right4f -Way Arrow (No median on ?Arrow) Rtiwanda Rochester 100 ft. now { 88' Right-Of-Way - Jersey u• sr �t' + :• �t' u• u A4 1t. SIR ft. ROW IV -55 SUBAREA 8 (Continued) Particulate Matter and Air Contaminants: In addition to compliance wia the Tqpw s an ar s, all uses shall be operated so as not t2 emit particulate matter or air contaminants which are readily detectAAble without instruments by the average person beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses. Odor: All uses shall be operated so at not to emit a. a r causing unpleasant odors which are perceptible to the average person beyond any lot lire of the lot _ containing such uses. Humidity, Heat and Glare: All uses shall be operated so as not pr" a uccee unidity, heat, `1 re or high- intensity illumination which is percq, Able wi'Wput i instruments by the average person beya�. the lot line of any lot containing such uses. Special Consideration Due-to tWpotential conflicts between uses wiVain this subarea Andy sas within the Industriao,' Park Category, cif adjacent Subarea 6 & 7, building setback from abutting property for Medium Manufacturing and greater intensity shall be no less than 45'. Clabs C Performance Standards of the adjoining Minimum Impact /Heavy Industrial area (Subarea 9 ), allow existing businesses and future Industrial uses which � produce noise, particulate matter aad air'contamInants, vibration, odor, humidity, heat, glard' or hicn intensity. Uses sensitive to these conditions, such as precision manufacturing or office projects, should consider these .factors prier to location in the vicinity of Minimum Impact /Heavy industrial property. Both the potential park site location and fire station location are shown to irdicate approximate location. 0evelopmatnt within 600' of the I -16 Freeway shall have outdoor storage areas completely screened from view alohy _vki freewey, Because of the existing rail services users with tail service needs are permitted c{tAL SNiti "• within the area west of Milliken Avenue. 1(RAMMtj "`-joy To preserve and enhance the image of the c unity special congiderations shell be given th,'he quality of site desiqny;:architecture, and landscaping of al , pro; art:ies adjaceni 'tr, the I -15 freeway. Attractive` =_ screening of outdoor ;_',rk, loading, storage areas, roof,ift and ground mounted equipment from significant freeway points cf view shall be required. 0; Iv -57 1 is Aft k7alts,o CHAVIPER OF COMMERCE 7365 CARNELIAN STREET, SMITE 130 February 23, 1987 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 917301 TFLEPHON�E. 7141987.iot,' E City'; c£ lancho Cucamonga Attn: Brad Huller. City Planner 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CPS, 91730 Subject: I9 Amendments Sine -awea #8 Dear Brad: Y The Economic Development Committee has now reviewed the draft amendments furnished by your offir'r several times, and finds ccncurrer,ce with the amendments air tUrrently proposed. At the January meeting of the EDC, discussion centered aroutid what types of creening techniques skould be required for new Lases looted a'jacent to the Devore Freeway. The EDC feels that thew Futur uses should be ac4equately screened from view, Znasmnch as this corridor is, important visual entryway to Rancho Cucamonga. Y-he EDC zzels that a visual line -of -siqht analysis iC,could be required for each use located ad•tac€;nt to this freeway, to ;fie condu ^ted .from the v =astern -must travel lane of the freeway" :, Pertaining to permtitted user.,,-the EDC feels that, while storage rises along with warehou s,.#° may n<6k be the ultimate employee- intensive kind of lance 'use to ,1:,•. realized, this axea may see interim development of uzey,like these, at least until such time as the, regional sh t'bing center and other r developments of that character become real.„ty. The EDC ,supports the amendments as presontsd, and will be available at future public hearings before the manning Commission and City Council •:o `so recommend. T}, *nk you -nd your staff for yo�x assistance in our review of this project. Truly yours, RA O CUCAMONGA CHAMBER COPt�czc� %E�S;_� ary tchell, Chairman Eccn t Development Committee cc: Bob Dutton _