Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987/05/27 - Agenda Packet"EWA .. s CITY OF a RANCHO CUCAytONGA PLANNING CO1VJIvIISSION , j , 2 AGENT 1977 WEDNESDAY May 27,1987 7:00 P.M. LIONS PARE COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LIFE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALiFOBNIA L Pledge of Allzgiance IL Roll can Commissioner Blakesiey— Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Emeriek' _ Commissioner Tolstoy= III. Announcements IV. Cwt Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine end non :controversial, They will be _acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. I A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -15 THE NALBANDiAN GROUP - A proposal to construct 24,000 square feet of-IM ni - storage buildings an 1.64 acres of land in the General Industrial Area, Subarea - 1, located at the northwest corner of 9th Street and Vineyard Avenue - APN 207 - 252 -51. B. TRACT 10045 DESIGN R'TVIEW - MAYFLOWER HOMES - Design review Of build:ng elevations and plot plans io a previously recorded tract map cmonsisting of ten single family lots on 5.3 acres of land in the Very Low Density Residential Districts (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Haven Avenue at Almond Street - APN 201 - 422 -19 thru 28. C. TrYIE EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 9392 - ENTi C _NSU_LT NT - A division of 103 acres of land into parcels within the Caryn planned Cominunity boundeu-by the extension of Banyan Street, Highland, Avenue, and the extension of Rochester Avenue - APN 225=141 -24, 29_, 8, 28 and APN 225 - 141 -1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 10, 11,12 and 13. } 1�I r1. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12643, - It EVTEC - A testiest for Time Extension for Tentative Tract 7 9 e43 is residential subdivision for the development of 466 . 14 le family lots on 109 acres of land in the Caryn PIanned Community (Phase ),located on the north side of-Highland Avenue, south side of Banyan Avenue, west - sie of Rochester Avenue, east side of Milliken Avenue - APN 225- 141 -08, 12 -16, 18, 22;24, 26, 27 and 225 - 151 -3, 7, 11, 13. V. Public Hearings The following items are public hea. -pgs in which concerned Individuals may voice their opink of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the? �airman and address the Commission by stating pour nari(, and address. All. such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for eac3 project. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ` AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13305 - LEWIS HOMES - The total development of a residential subdivision of 8.08 acres within the Terra 4 Vista Planned Community (Low- Medium Residential, 4 -8 dwelling units per acre) into 48 lots, located on the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive' - APN 227- 1.51 -13. (Continued from April 22, 1987) F. FDOTHML BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN' - A public hearing and workshop to consider the provision s of the Draft Foothill Boulevaed Specific Plan. ( Continued from May 18, 1987) G. ENVIRONMENTAL , ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13304 - LEWiS HOMES - The total development of a residential subdivision of 11.13 acres located within the Werra Vista Planned Community (Low- Medium Residential, 4 -8 dwelling units per acre) into 59 lots, located on the nortiiwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive - APN 227- 151 -13. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TEFTATNE TRACT' 13273 - LEWM- HOMES - A total_develooment residential subdivision of 15.8 acres within the Terra Vista Planned Community (Median -high Residential,, 14 -24 dwelling units per acre) into 1 lot for condominium purposes for 256 dwelling units, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive - APN 227- 151 -13. i rP J I: ENVIRONMENTAL A$ -kod Xr FIND CONDIT10NAL USE PERMIT 8715 " - CALVARY C -VAPEL - A request to establish a church within a leased'�{et .of 5.,044 square feet (Suites 812;` 813 and 814), of ca new 5-acre industrial ` park that is under construction, in the General Didustriai District Subavea 4, located at the southeast corner of Archibald Aven:le and 7th Street - APN 209-211-36 and 47. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT ^344.8 -u WILLIAM LYf)N COMPANY - A residen ial f " tract subdivision o 29.25 acres of lmdinto 152 single -` family Icts in the Low - Medium Density Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Planned Fes:' Community, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon Way - APN 227- 011 -02, 03, 04, Q7 ` and 227 - 081 -08, 09. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -02B - CITY OF RANCHO LUCA` MONGA An application to amend the Land Use Element o the General Plan from: _ A. Heavy Industrial to General Industrial for approximately` X, 106 acres at the future southeast corner of Arrow r highway and Utica Avenue to the future intersection of Arrow Highway and Milliken Avenue; and for tr approximately. 52 acres at the southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Rochester Avenue; and for approximately 7.5 acres on the southeast corner of Etivranda and Whittram Avenue; and B. General Industrial to Industrial Park for approximately 35 acres on the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and White Oak Avenue; and C. General Industrial/Rail Sei ,ved to General Industrial for all areas currently designated as General Industrial/Rail Served. J ;' z L. 'ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 87-04 - SCI3LOSSER FORCE CO.- A request to reduce the number of parking spaces required for a manufacturing use, eliminate the requirement far trees to be planted 1 for eves -.3 parking sialls;';�nO also eliminate tine requirement for trees to be planted adjw ent to structures, 1 for every 30 linear feet' of building dimension, for.'the development of two new manufacturing buildings at , an existing manufacturing facility on 17.4 acres o' -` land in the .�1 Minimum 'mpact Heavy., Industrial District (Subarea 9) In; located at the s� thwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue - APN 229 - 111 - 17;-18. (Related File DR 87 -DQ). VL New Business M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -09 - SCHLOSSER FORGE - The development of two manufacturing buildings Lotaliag 5 000 square feet at their existing facility on 17.4 acres' 4 19me. withir- the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial- District (SubE Y` 9) located at the southwest corner of A�`�ow Ro�{ tuid Rochester Avenue - F i Ilf 229 - 111 -17,, and 1t: jK ®later File VA 87 -04). VII. Director's Reports N. TERRA VISTA rLANNED COMMUNITY STREET _ IMPROVEMENT IMPLEMENTATION POLICY O. BILLBOARD REMOVAL PROGRAM r VIII. Commission Busir DL Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission.. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. X. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adapted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment tame. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of I the Commission. L 1� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM®NGA rv- .;; ClTYY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM s n 0 0 v 1977 DATE: May 27, 107 TO: airman; and Members of the Planning Commission FROM:, Brae. Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren Associate As oc�at Planner SUBjEC a FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN Due to the large size of tie land use charts the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan report and att:,chments have Neen copied under a separate l cover. Please refer to this information for Agenda Item F. b — — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c�OC'AI STAFF REPORT W�, r U E DATE: May 27, 1987 1977 1 _ TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission ` FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: `ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -15 proposal to construct , square feet of mini-, torage buildings on 1.64 acres of z` land in the General Industrial Area, Subarea 1, located at the northwest earner of 9th Street and Vineyard Avenue - APN 207- 262 -51: I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: `M A. Action Regaest0i Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: lodes, - n vs orage; u area South' - Commercial; Subarea 1 East - Fic,fd Control Channel; Subarea 1 West - Vacant; Subarea 2 D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial - East - General Industrial Wrst - General Industrial n. Site Characteristics; The site is vacant and rough graded, street improvements and landscaping within public right -of -way along 9th Street and Vineyard are completed, the site to the north contains Phase I of the Vineyard West Mini'- Storage. E. Parking Calculations. No. of no. of Type of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Mini- Storage 2,400 1- 1000/ 23 23 1 -2000 { ITEM A- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 87 -15 - THE NAJ BANDIAN GROUP May 2"', 1987 Page 2 11. ANALYSIS. A. General: The project is intended to provide mini warehouse storage facilities permitted as an extension of the existing Vineyard West Mini - Storage facility to the north which was approved under Conditional Use Permit 84 -27 as i gas statfian, multi- tenant industrial buildings, mini - storage, and future building pad ;See Exhibit "D "). The project has been reviewed :�y the Design and Technical Review Committees and it was requested that the project come back before the Design Review Committee prior to the Planning Commission meeting in order to resolve design concerns. Upon approval of the Negative Declaration the City Planner will grant final approval of the project based on conditions recommended by the Design and Technical Review Committees. Design-Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Chitiea, M;3iiel, Colenan) reviewed the project on May 7, 1987 and recommended that it be forwarded to the Planning Commission with the following conditions: 1." That the site plan should �_e revised to provide secondary emergency poiets of ingress and egress according to the Foothill Fire District standards. 2. That landscaping should be continued around the northeast corner of Building D at the project entrance at Vineyard Avenue. 3. That the applicant shall return to Design Review Committee on May 21, 1987 with alternative concepts for building treatment on gth Street. 4. That spe6 1 landscape treatment shall be provided on the corner of 9th Street and Vineyard Avenue such as multi trunk size trees, accent trees etc. B. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and II of the Initial Study have been completed and no significant impacts have been found related to the construction of the proposed building. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is consistent with the General an an n ustrial Specific Plan, the building design and site plan together with recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with the Industrial Specific Plan and all other applicable City Standards. 11'7 ., PLANNING CG, s I'�StAF`REPORT DR 87 -15 THE NALBA!{DIAN GROUP May 27, 1987 Page 3 IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommnends that the Planning Comission tssue.a eyatM Declaration for Development Review 87 -'15. Respe lly su �( i r Cit y Pla er BB4CW:sar Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "S" - Site Plan Exhibit "0 - Elevations Exhibit "Q" - Conditional We:?ermit 84 -27 Site Plan Y, 7 nm µ _ 1 -7 �'.T....� nis cut urw G�UQ. �1fJ -• }I weaver 1� 1l;OR`w. ` CITY Qr-rEr�r:..�r3°7-- i R.A, CHO CUCAl jo -jNGA r;, PLANNING DIVISION EXHIi r.- 9�1 „SCALE: 'NUJ I � * 1:1.t to roc �to:c:. a1 rd Arenas 1 ru 'IIn. MINI nor. k - m_ r '7�L�l��l�" `�Y7R_ TIi� CITY OF ITF -%,[: PLANNING DIVISICkN EXHIBIT-_..l SCALE. ►S k a -` t �F BUILDING A, rsama. �x++..nca rsv c n�eua VEST ELEVATION At VINEVAAO A NINTH 71 •� 0 NOUH CITY OF ITEND RANCHO CUCANAONTGl� MU. LE: PL.A:ti:vFI.tiG DIVLSIty*,d EXHiBrr: SCALE; No A i` i KI - - vsa s. vs• arcaaavuv vUVtilYlV4V lTK. STAFF REPORT i DATE: May 27, 1987 ` TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TRACT 10045 WESIGN REVIEW) - MAYFLOWER HOMES - Design rev ew o: ul .ng elevations an plot plans for a previously recorded tract map consisting of ten single family lots on 5. acres of land in the Very Low Density Residential District (less khan 2 dwelling units /acre), located on the west Ode of Haven Avenue at Almond Street - APN 201 - 422 -19 through 23. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of .building elevations, plot plans and conceptual grading.plan. B. Project Density: 1.87 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning or - vacant; erg ow 6ensity Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) South - Hillside Flood Control Channel and Vacant; Flood Control and Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) East - Single Family Residential; Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling _ units /acre) West - Vacant; Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) D. General Plan Designations: Project e - Dry ow-Vensity Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) North - Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) South - flood Control and Very Low Density Residential District '(less than 2 dwelling units /acre) East - V - -'nry Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) West - Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units /acre) ITEM B PLANNING COMISMION STAFF RVOUM TRACT 10045 DESTGN RFV1EW MAYFLOWER May 27, 198�/ Page Z ABU E. Site Charactedstics: The site slopes froT northeast P) — ___9 souUwest at 5ugfily to, 10 percent. There are a f ew a rea�al T 'the generally adjacent �to street, where the site exceeds 20" percent slope. The! si te is bisected by the H111side Channel. �J II. ANALYSIS: A.- Background: Tentativ e Tract 10045 was originally approved by Plannfnq Commission on December 10' 1980, 7 as a custora I ot �"N subdivision of 26 lotsi Subsequently, the tract was recordod in two Tr�ict 1,0045 phases - consists of the. 10 lots north of 'he hillside Channel and Tract 10046-1 conifi�z. of the 16 lots south of t�.n Hillside Channel, B. General; The applici,,%t is proposing two floor plans,for the 10 T-M-I'd Tract 10,045 a one-story and a two-s tory unit. Each floor plan will haVi four elevations. The downhill lots have been -'designed, using stem wall and , -raised foundation construction techniques. Also, 6 1S-foot Usable rear yar�4 area will be provided throagh.the use of decksi The uphill 'lots bcve been designed wfi�t the garages split from the living Trio use of these techniques will minimize the grading �Andlor alteratfon to,the natural landform. C. Design Revi ew Commt*,td't\, On May 7, 1987, the Design Review Co%C Ttee ( Emerl c,K, 13uvler) revietted the project ant recommended approwl, sutdeCt to the following conditions: 1. Additicrial architectural detail,�.jg (brick or stone) should be provided or, the stem walls ol� Lot 1 to mitigate the mass of t�,e elevation, 2. Landsi:aping -thbufld be required along the rear elevations of Lot 2 and 3 to mitigave the mass of the elevations. 3. Architectural detailing consistent with thd front elevations should be provided on the side elevation facing Xavan Avenue of Lots I and 10. 4. ^,orner side yard walls (decovative) should be provided along Haver Avenue. 5. Small stem walls should be incorporated into th* f ront of tfie uni ts on Lots 7 and 8 to mi Mad ze the 2'1 sl0­.( adjacent to the street. AdNL PLANNLGtil�$Si3OHPF i2EPORT" I/ TRACT 10045 R$IGN REVTEWt —MAYFLOWER° May 27, °1987 = -. Page 3 � 1 D. Trails Committee: A 12 ,400t Community Parkway Trail should De . equired along Haven Avenue consistent with previously approved trail plans for this tract (see Condition„ No. 8). ; Staff notes that this -tract was " approved prier to the tr'nil policies, therefore local " faeder traits were not required, :,However,, the Hillside '1 Channel right -of -way to the south and the f1oGj control land to the north provide ;;citable trail access as determined'�y the Trails Cmaittee in 1981, III. RECOMMENDATION: 3iaff recommends that the Planning Comm si ±dn e 5uilding approve elevations and plot plans for Tract 10045 through adoptign ni' the atta�he,c,,Resolution Frith conditions. Res, ully s tied Ji Brad Bult e I r Gity PYanner, G BB:SM•te N Attachments. Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C " - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations Resolution of Approval with`Comiitions i I I I �i �1 e C q 4 d u l • i �91 I i LYNX 01- mr- .et:.� t� �- rf RAvc,io Mo, 1 i---� --= -•- _.._ � ^,irk F c� i 1 4 T w \ `t kM ff A crry OF- RANCHO CUC.A.1-VIOiNGA RT- SCALE, J� 7 r I ' V H r'TTY or. y� w r / / �( � /!� .t I i J err i f / �! ! i /• J j� tnl •J r rr i q-� 4 CT Cq,M G PLANNmLNG piVOON EYHYEi!' ': SckLE- 0y ;7 wi CITY Qh RA'NC CUCA-ML Oi .GA. [TEL t: _ ? d lam- 1 TiCt,E- PLANNING DR 5 QN S l EKHlM7: Z/ SCALE: vi aa1� jsC e AQ N4 F � 0 c�73 WW y� ! 1 1 i 1 Ovi �LL WQ 0 u3 r CI'T'Y CSI. 0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING MISM �° � E�CHIE4tT: �2 AGILE I 2 ,��lp I�n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trru, PLANTNl,NG DrvooN i i Mm I 1 i m` CITY O rMm- � RANCHO C,'C, &IVICi GA MANNT \G DV4SIGN E,�HtBCt°: t� � ari I 1 i m` CITY O rMm- � RANCHO C,'C, &IVICi GA MANNT \G DV4SIGN E,�HtBCt°: t� El El } } � .\ \�� � � \: IN r \ � � �:cll ro CITY or IT EN 1: 74' Ad-Wc- RANCHO CUC.-,jONGA TrrLF.- AIC- I� CITY or. RANKID CUCAMONGA PLAMitNG Lei ISM T 11 I .:E s { F W CITY or, RANCHO CUCAiMQNGA PLANtddiC, i3iV"iSM S.jS i i jf� j�i CITY OF RANCHO CUCkiMONLGA IIIINIODIV�- S_iq TrrLE- ExHlarr. SCAM 0 j] 01 r d n W YF I u it II r z E- 0 (r 3- F_ w� �:d aye 3 CITY QF T RAItiCHQ CUCAMONG, , Pi •16 ��c —.�. sr,\LE= -- - RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTIO9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSTON ` APPROVING DESIGN REVJEW FOR TRACT NO. 10045 LOCATED ,'A THE WEST SIDE OF KAAN AVENUE AT ALMOND STREET IN THE VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRIGi` WHLkEAS, on the 25th day of March, 1987, a complete application`wa-1 filed by mayflower -homes for review of the above - described project; and S WHEREAS, on the 27th day of May, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissioi; held a meeting to consider the above- described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commiss:fon.= resolved as follows: SECTION 1: 1 ;z�t,:.tie foltowing can be met: 1. That the ro osed p p project is consistent with the F. objectives of the Generrtl Plan; and ` 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of ttie Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and f. 3, That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and 4. Th&L t1h proposed use, together with the conditions applicab ?e thereto, will not be detrimental to the publid health, safety, or welfare, or mat,r'aily ic,jurious to prn- -^ties or improvements in the `,i cini ty. SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tract 10045 is approved subject to the fa oTT wingg conditions and attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: 1. Additional architectural relief (brick or rock) shall be provided on the stem walls, of Lot i to mitigate the mass of the elevation. The revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Landscapina shall be required along., the elevations of Lots 2 and 3 to Mitigate, the mass'of stem walls on that elevation. The -.0 idscape and irrigation plans wall be reviewed 4�n4 approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. Building and Safety 1. The cross -lot drainage swales along the southern tier of lots shall be improved to the satiffaction of the Builfling Official. 2. Revise the grading an the north tier of -,"^ts to eliminate cross -lot drainage. f, PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO. x DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 10045 - MAYFLOWER May 27, 1987 4 Page 2 Q Architectural detail -ing consistent with the front elevations shall be required on the earner side elevations facing Haven Avenue of Lots 1 and 10. 4. Decorative wells shall be required on the corner side yards of Lots 1, and 10. The design and location of the ' Walls shall be shown on the landscape plan to -ye reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits, 5. Small stem walls (two feet) shall be,:incorporated into the front of' the units on Lots 7 and 8 to minimize the 2:1 slopes adjacent to the streets. The revised plans shall be reviev" and approved by the City Pir..iner prior to the. `;ssuance of building permits. 6. Detailing (plant -ons or trice with stucco over) shall be provided around all windows. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits, 7. All roofing material shall be tile as indicated on the material sample board. 8. Developer shall install a Community Parkway Trail along the entire Maven frantage per City Standar ,'c, including street trees west of the westerly tra.1 fence. A street tree maintenance easement shall be Jedi sated to the City. A detailed trail improvement plan indicating widths, maximum sic.pes, physical conditions, .fencing and weed rontrol, in accordance with City equestrian trail istandard drawings, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 9. All pertinent conditions of approval as contained in Resolution 80 -77 shall apply. Building and Safety 1. The cross -lot drainage swales along the southern tier of lots shall be improved to the satiffaction of the Builfling Official. 2. Revise the grading an the north tier of -,"^ts to eliminate cross -lot drainage. f, d4, PLANNING COt�tRTM (lEI kI1T50Li1TFOR NO. r DESIGN REVIEW FOR T1"Aff" 10045 -�'MAYFLOWEP May 27,• 19$7 Faye 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF -gANCKO WtAMONGA BY: f, Larry T. MCNIelp ai rrr�aR- ATTEST: ra u er, epa y ecru ary I, Brad Buller, Di Secretary* of the Planning Commission of the City of le Rancho Cucamonga, ,ereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and f regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held 1 on the z7th day of May, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: f. AYES: COMMISSIONER$: NOES: GOKIISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: f a q� y0yp �@ � ■o; C.y. ae"Y .: `\ ft Lf.. o�w 6x00 �.6 —Lwq CL HG40E1S Ycy 05�0� °i ° :•a �� °«�'aaa �C °$° a�iu SSb�ar,. rim °°i'ea� $�e o''v �o.� - �u °`.�a. c'a•g ��ec. � \. Y�N. u�f�o vw°gao +o�a ®�A.nA.� Y4� O Su'p _� i d >O— C �vyr M V Y9 Ovp t!` y qq pp ff.�, P C —�y Y i Mtlg O [SY C.93 li.-S iYw w.q go E — °•- acrd 8ti,i u f. gi vw u �wva.��e mOi uSi s` z '9 ► r .z r Mob O `a O.+ om allia x ° �. p S ll w�0.-40` �aY� :RrEs °v$ 4ry°"d ww— a °' "• o °et V, e�t> A ° O s�e9d _� y. —g_ _ aei a, 2 w o m —�. a., wy 'u° oI.- `yq�fu p \ t- SAS lil 3 m3u af>3® 5 °s �L�f Jivii & :+ O a V K O Z g 0 'l Ask • � ,T.' YY8S.1�L0 ^ t ,,,iii ® j t O 00 y q a •�i 1 ,y �WW r ° .. s Y�34.MLp �Y f O'9 Yi i Z4 'l Ask >o01 �s. Gb�Y a yr Vi BYO Y. a ap s *ydjf" iY$ z 4L{.—CU 6M�Y1 L Y s pbpgCN �yV - ` Ng MS vN_i ^°ZQ�r M y+y Z —Q or g tl C �a« Y Q ([:y y Q S� 4 y q- N M Y 4Q L} 4 ~ NLZ.N 24q G r +y. KA- U GoC0. V C Gr Qqy r• y.,��t Y y ti bQGM G YI°. by L V 9�09V.�. gQ IL ! R. L. C^. .+ S b p yy Q +a 9. i4 N t c O u y 'N^yt CAN 16YQ -� aff9 R4; a YU quaric?u 14 S-v y y 3 p YS Y' Obi O C.n'M M P..1GS 6T! nq t G•�V Y. atli•M yV ou�o Y�yS "Ex -C -C N= -c4CYf a 6a Y[h C= C p c O 4wi70q ~C� Y Z Q h D Y t °s«` It N u Y^ ah y wG_pMv7�S C !w � w 49 c y YQQppys tcM CY °« j( y yi yyy.y et T c�y{ �+�b S. q3 Cy =�yy p. bG Y� t�IYffi r~ry{� iuy�Yjp.+ S.�SSVY 7 •�aY�. D�iLYL agy^_QC L�y�. OCR l��6G KYNYV6 QoLV�Y MN'NH lSa VI Y hYMN Ywrk WG.�tlY� iif =j!s°� Ni u bC M .y yAY° to q.b NY4 �• tl 0`Mw ^w e�iw 4 =LY.j. o2q.:o .1 C `Y Q,`Y. r SY } y `w 6 EOi ®�. �N a°Y 4 u0 Ai G� = 6VC C~ + u � .7h us Slow r -3Y �--a Ca C: Qnn G •per `� MY.�r 8 9 L L_ " Q V A 4 CY 4 : C Q. N Si{"' YY pp�,,` w Y Y> 3. Y �C$V4 igas 4 9 . L Y O ! w R V � pu I�YppCiq w tl �ppf �� ° w `arCC q xY'. � z� 79 � I.- y 62 was r °V ;Y; .- YC � aC S gar AOGC Cep^ ►� ^ '..1b yq CV O.'s bCWC O°�q ..C.CgA y CS YqN TY2 LT �'MOf LOW. '°� Ay Co zr0z vpOOv. S C Vb'C G9 +N�� GQ�` pl-O yG Y6rC `C CAA3 p.C�4Q� 2" C 2X; Y..� NZ CZ You 4b +`�O 6Qr�i wM& GY ±Y 4�C °OY�r�Y¢npr� �~0. w.V• XZ S9C Y Y .-4 G C M g �6G °�O. b tr C` Q'.Y ■. YO4 ve •Y; j .r Q4cyi VQC>Nr V`b C"Q All lip v+ qY+u 91�. r CY ��n+K Ol X111. �. �� � � ♦� {� °OVw `, �L° c r6c taxi o rfioam -c- r�wn cyV�i ivp°y � - yr6 ia EVxL rr• � Y O � — � L Yr A. n0yy�� ci Osdw m �zY d � tl i. M'e ° omyGr y"a� C449°f�if C •w-` NY V a¢ ymt a,: {{{��i� yh' ...= ,�OsOLm t�Y� ..C.w .r «C ®. -rrr auLO.hu 5,.. AMO gG m .Qwy� �.+ .tiG�.Ny + °. i. ^O rr. yTSr OC ��NO ^.• rOYw -i °StN 07�.p L+-C '.tYr L' N�C d•*r� L.a nyi0 °��YL4i +•LM dh A�1 VMS,. �y u ut�4.r� N�441 � ; Lp L aM N 1°(�r Q Y • �G: ~ µN.GV`.*—i°NGy- � � a � E � 'Qaa1`p$ Nx..Cy ! h Y ar L u m `' wpL sy � N � � MISnM � Y1�mr �qtl m �C4� n m. O 1 ° of [ SO. L •�� ®¢C N Y Y m Y w. - y O 1Ci g M —sta. V r� ■° ooN °4�CLC `wmwG` Aw.L iti Sy� W *m. 11O�OL�4CC �• +�°j ��! ci�i0..{pv N�MYM .('N.a C(M 9N0. PL.m M.3 KM Y�r PS a�1N0.0 ^°�CC lN�• ` KY OCpm4i YL. GR pFC OVrw.. Nc AY Q O�gOt Oi,C.ei 1P +y't $umdi�9 6v` O�Gq�m 11a L84 M ■NmNm wQ wC y EN C6� +$qq 09 +yN. LA> E. nw � L'^ my,y�cm ar'gi � P g � �.'� .2 y w■.g A`y i L ^y Z. Or NC $■ G =s S.� i a°iM a AR W✓ C4�� Ns YN uNz- �L sar° jai 21 uwa c=„p ~� ws a.N 4 v"F'`o � N O ay�c�N °ust �A t 1 - y ��M w M v txt .� $ U, 41 4� Z.;­ 6 ­ O Owp y A� 4� a.OL .r• yMr. -. *r mom' C��Mru a ,e.w. cum°. y�.y Ya'i �. .. M O �qq ks [1 Y a +u CT .a 4 L` J 11 L• •V• � ii �'q '�" V Y gyp. � Y Y Vt1 aUJ. KwuL �wC 1+ Sos I.. S� y L C 9 w G i N dir Lgis bNL'y jt' gS�jL N`p ah� Q ap Vy ij� A p LA+►N .0 i ■(» 1J+ 'ass= ga µ; Y'0. L74 = 4 y ay.Etla L. L 4a�C �4.a u �C..a ,.4y4 YA¢. pe ■C� „� DYb@C"� Spa. gL.aiN Or. Lw.- �auej ssC.octl.,.4vy�w N op V ICY[ 9 2 ZZw Mii 4 r ti� y A b�p ^�rvSCO OwuY CG 4 44 LMC 4i CS9R � 9w Q Sr y Ggas G''t�u'G R y V ^�`�. N. do a.~w.� S ♦mow � _w t b bup� CQ W«L aroDtly >a �4. �% E ay tlV1L qtl�.E S L V p N�J V O Mp ppY4A �J N Rte. ' �Y+/M i KM��y' y4N. 111-2 w�iN♦ N V.y cL.y 4Y �NU. 5.1p y ?, ..-T y it ii f It Z.2 h0 S 094E CyC I!m ti .v ZZ tl wp 4. opybw C2C yNO. IT x b ctip� w 4 4 a4N C ro4 M.� r 3 ro�'V 4 ySy M C •� R 4 y it w Y N Y M L 24Gx a OG �s Y V S Xs = Y b av4c y4 Y C E.0 *9 LL Gp�A N 4 Vim« k_yL V Y NM+ M.�qY QW Z E4tl YC46 °~LCi 4L G 'wp 9 YNM sY Z49ag. wa�yy4� � CCq 4G Y N V 01 b.3 y.1 tl a w 4Dy if w YZ9 AhR1 ply 7sY C.M w +ip•' "< SM A-all ti K q Cr'D aj0 4V Vy Yyri� 4 'CES3 L ~ �yti 46 A'4 �aw4SDF Vr N.. = M 1•rtl1. A C N ti T Miti 1p -ta, Y 40 +L,Y M •y Yq ZZ r4 'OCS Y� M�tl d NR qa p4 Gt� yf3y}��} M �p�G GQ •gC•'' `O�w g L. r ■ L. � O N ' zf` k a..°. r s4 s A w ` a sapsy, C� � a 4 R L �C4 CM�✓a+ V-0a �y 4Yi iL OryiY. 9 {w.uLO of a�w yO Vey. °1,4°n.. 4 it Ll Yom. _J t41 y NYS L A Otl VA u V 2g A V �a N vu 4G g$—m. w . < < a °.ks O yy a::. u c`ei° °tl ` �a. r YaV= a wo u M s o'n$a i Y M G b r' fi °tr 'd E :F ^Go .:N ° is ° `r8 r Nt'�a• ��,. ° `° .2 yaa4Y� i d$42 1 ems. ~ L .,� 1 W;I $u. Al aess O sal l`dC a Cpap o ,a `pv.� «oae �'� c °i Flo Yq a2Gtl Cn= .a..wy `i Y V Y' $ �CY �y Y q 4q c cagy 1 3 cl%'3 otlA ,,a4'. o O y ae -x =� °ppGNQQ. aI p■N■ Y� O wpt Lp. Y4Y state ' aYy,Q °s 4Ni .Y �3L 1 Ma.N. aYY V' r 6t YL 7V CY ^C -5'z ! 4 9 �. app 1` g` G aC �( y- 2° $`l= N' >V N Y� CtaG111 vO0 {3{� ±p Q M M o� � Gi ceuS ► Ni yl a N E3 C� � _ Y I,IV� CO Ly NOM��p• �pyba> fps Y� � P O YN iI v a a � C LrbV �6 Gtr V.=G= t «. <f !H it Ll Yom. _J x�.' C RGS 04 i`y W O ,tiOt AOtY i i` r Cow YY ,':(((`^^^... �.4yy0 pRpy. �-, �"O: N pC �..�� C y "CS ..,>ems{V. �•n VM � C • "'gip ,p �ry Q. n 9 L y Y »�= V C 1. G 4 S Y � � � ♦.� 6 L� L M » O–Z Y ■■ cL� O. 1L uC C GVOS nC `~ NQ LDU�_� 9. CCO O ♦.�$ dL Ste. r Ly i = 3Yy•W L..^. OeNC N V = 6+ ♦T l s» CCC 2— Yt U. Cam. j y.4� M 7 ♦ �` = ;��" ���y �U Qd yy w ♦. L V' `. �• 1• q Vb� CG' i4Y ` 4 u� ♦Q 4 vVCL s' C W7; y L•y Yt ®�4 yet 4 wG.� 4 y1� C dZ ��.. i K WA y = �V Ytl LL vYv pp V. Q w Y ilr yy s� qy i0 W '` .VIM Y GN ^ SCOW E g4 ' 4C -5.9 4C ♦ YQ'_ tlU A ` rL Y J L 2OV G al �I` L M V.1Y�L !! C Y �+:• is o'er s.�"p� ! �$1 � �j • if b Y 6u �«Lt L y `� G .s�Y• LV 9`: tl �,L, ' iz l5i_* 6 i= Y-L �O VMi E V'O . AMC i�i yyYyw �Mg ��„ M."aY.� y.«.{y Y.g- i'� « it A�� y♦y L�t ^ ♦E :tV Y'r •� �` G � � �M YWS K4� SM O «Y♦• H.! ;wY !d i� W «w LLV- 38 N9 .ems � � C Z 1 1 i �Y i.I VY Y♦. 10 Vim♦` r »�Oi _��' ' Y�Y pG { w i`y GGy Y q LH At tt S uw �.". :.`� �./` a a�aTi. L„YL•,Z �vb n�a NM QN. tr b M» a_et 2 p CO.y. `S� ya. kry p. I' Q•.11UQGG'"� ^'u yr y'• �`q } VC O N L g ♦K =� t O �i #{ L� _VC CY U IT wr tz ' 1 h 1 Ywa; 9 a 4 w e �a •Cp� �; , � a � RYA Y1� .Yi4 O4 �p N i kaS Y _ • ,9 z S a �a °3�8 tY .o r N; S► w.�� as as au Y» Y Y. y s S G O N 4 N wff ` V G. V.SN1, +9 Ytl ytl +My Y C =.^�. VN Ls. .nOV� q C as ate$. aaiY�t ��; —Qa NN ►N N. ■ L '�"� 6 {� .rNY y_ `V S`3'bC ypC�Y grfi a I�My r, Cw H I( `a e.gY TM.iq �pa Er KW LAZli ;E a K6 pC.� 1 4r4a Y9Y. a- C � r V 4EW_- .I STAFF REPORT 0 DATE: May 27, 1987 L Qj U -Chairman arO Members of the Planning Commission 191, FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer SU6JECT: TIME 11 ENSION FOR PARCEL MAP, 9192 - EN7rC CONSULTANTS - A crivisi of 103 acres of in-d into 4 parcels within the Caryn Planned Community bounded by the extension of Banyan Street, Highland Avenue, and -e the - ,xt,ens i on of Roch4ster Avenue - APN 225-141-24, 27, 8, 28 -ind'APN 225-141-1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13. .'_" BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map 9192 as shown on Exhibit was thitially approved by the Planning Commission:o^, May '22, 1985, for an /initial two year period until May 22,, 1987. The applicant is now reauesting the first of a possible three one-year time extensions. The letter of request (Exhibit "All) is attached fe- your reference. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution approving a one-year-,time extension for Parcel Map 9192. The new expiratton date would be Ma j 22, 1988. Respectfully submitted, & VW A0, /*4u/ n" - - Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:BK:jh Attachments ITEM ��I x, RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO'CUCAMONrnA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSIOM FOR PARCEL MAP 9192 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension ,For the above- described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2 of Ordinance 26 -B-, the Subdivision Ordinance; and ` WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above- described tentative parcel map on May 22, 1985. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following in3ings; " A. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time. B. That strict enforcement of ' r;+ conditions of approval regarding expirations wou).d not be consistent With ` tho intent of the Oevelopment Code. C. That there has beeii, no significant changes to the character of the aret,l in which the project is located that would cause th( project to become conforming or inconsistent with cu ^rent standards. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension or; Parcel Map Applicant Expiration 9192 Entec Consultants Aft R APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27 DAY OF May, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY,OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA n;, BY: Larry T. McNie , Chairman ATTEST- Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga., do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and replarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Co,- ;fission of the City of Ranchp �Pvcamonga, at a regular meeting of the Pianpirg,CoRmissla held on the 27t of June, 1487, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES COMMISSIONERS: Nott: COMMISSIONERS: -, ABSENT: CO.iMISSIONERS:`;,, .. %;CQnsultants., In.c. IWIS E. COISY Orivb»GrAtan. :;2�it4 �r (714) $25-2 �� M�•i e. I�t37 ' if--- cl r ,. Rancho Cumamotisa Xag., neering Division P.O. Box fjo? itallchu Cucamonga, CA 91730 -0817 Attn. Walter Stickiiay Lear Walt, on Mau 1. 1987 yo? u brought it `to my attention that Parcel. Map 9292 fPhase 2 of the Cairyh Proje,ety 'was dk,,g to expire wiLtilit tka next UI clays. As tha engineering reprQr- QAtativaa for Marlborough Develo'cle it Co`mV4siy and Kaufman avid Broad .qa sire requesting a 12 monts extension for this asap. Thi \extension is necessary try cant -�n4a and complete Phase 2 of tTiis project. f•10ase -find enclosed a check for $62.00 to covor the zees for extension of the Parcel Map. Your time and rttte:ct" , z� `�r�tlne this matter is appv,aciated. i Sincerely, OORobert P. King, P. Z, Project: Engineer RPK,/ma y { CO. Paul Byrnes - Marlborough ! Beaus Mayor - K&S enc. OOINURING biY�aitrtY 1._ Tr U.- �J9i Ft �lfido 19 mix. it tCN ?C11ff 1Ct'pw,js] OECR CANYON. *AY CANYON COUNTY OF SAN. 86RAIARDINq �•'a L4 CITY OB AAUtHO • —\CUCAMONGA , *` SPHERE OF INFLV .N4E CITYOFRANCHO CNARPEY j CUCdMONGA COLLEGE , t BA&YAN PRQPOSEti mmonwwl HIGHL.:aO BAS=-)NE rww ']OTWILL ui C a c z VY1 — OF RANCHO MUMMA EUGMEEBMG DIMI3N c .6' El Lill lii2L!,WA'TW0 AM I4Arr— cater `_�• �. ANNA �50,4©�• — Vo, ACRES � � ACRt:S 28.8C ACRES ��'!.�•_ / Tm►sears Cana , 0 a �1 5� raw ��y- •� -.✓1. e���'�?` I},'' ,., v �nT■vTaT+rrj ..rJ 1V 1, -, \�t� _ � �� —� SV ^•� �. r r�a.ecy o 1 m►•3'.F �-A 1710 a a L.r�.E.L.....w.,. nwrtnfraw A � r r all a...,q •. L aOia AREA -,03 Um asna tm• 2• ALL ■IR■I103 uI A -WIMTI OIlLIT[[2WtIlOtRO K: M Cur■ [A■q9 I'll fi1�M. IC. iOSEa TW1,ILL fO1tOfR .L alWlr lR. I. LSILTIK 2d11K a ClOT11 /. C. fN1�in wo fiflR :Il•!•iSID,ES4CiClMROIii. tl fiT]t tl ifi)f ,. "MIN 1NlIK . CYTR I.C. f.O. ■O NS NWTfT u!]! CICMlIt. 4 Hie SaYTM . T M. C4,T ]111 EAST Yl aK 1. CYIK3a Dlfm (YORt1 I!S /4— 7• ` A` FINCa O•IR Y[fT - uW0111lL 'lull. a (list (. TOT4..1AUR OF N CFLS •d- / 4 SignN ClEe.a•1W 0FYT ! 2. Ta{ YI 4. n1E 11S' vi 3utulm OO TIME (' lflf S. ]RfL COtE.Ti LSO, a GIE[I[R 1■ ■IlrtTll O• sITE. auTtl■, u fan [. I.ItOYCU■T REKISFO STAA 1E Kt. NRICKL[ m[I+rM E^ Citl OF ■woe COELe.M• y S.L1 Ita. RSTYa�Tt< 9. ?.IS tiT 13 to FI■NCIfL. CO■YLTmE ""Its 4R RttRf■!R, 4 O,LT uW CiFJIYiR. u 11131 10. SS[]SO■ I4KEL 4.3 225.101 -20. 7a. IOfr ON !i'TE NICM■!T t.0. ■-3W 225 - 153.1. 1. I. 7. (. 10. I1. 12. 13 a.f. YtR 1 ■SNI, fiOLor F.I, llfit>fIS O TN Il. IlfCEI 5 TO l[ OLDICLT[O TO IME CM W 41111 fli N NSRIllM M. EAST a Yr CYI1t. �„ W'•1IT11ai. ■A" C.C. t,� IM -uLIC fYE SatI0sE3. aEIK � SVt[IYISIO!1 Mllll■TIO■ 1Plt1.,[ST OUatT[■ f,O 1O■TIO, SOOiwE.'T WNTER OF SECTIO■ 30. TOY,prl1 l �(•(p��•,}V�.'f �p� {��j� y�� 4RT ■• ■VI/.E 6 YEti LO AFRMS)IK Km 11,I.M. AWL s fl E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 27, 1987 0 yf= 0 kx TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission U,E ' f FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner ion BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT, TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12643 - -ENTEC - A request or Time x east on or em,a ve rac , 43, a residential subdivision for the development of 466 single family rots on 109 acres of land in the Caryn Planned Community (Phase 11), located on the north side of Highland Avenue, south side of Banyan Avenue, west aide of Rochester Avenue, east side of Milliken Avenue - APN: 225 ^141 -08, 12 -16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 27 and 225 - 151 -3, 7, 11, 13, 1. BACKGROUND : Tentative Tract 12643 was originally approvea by the p anrnng oWis ion on May 2P., 1985 for a twi year period. This sub;ivisidn represents Phase II of the Caryn Planned Community which was annexed into the City effective �.pril 3, 1985. Phase I j of the Caryn Planned Community (Tentative Tract 12642) has been records' and is currently under construction. II. ANALYSIS: Concurrent with the City's adoption and annexation of e pac fic Plan for the Caryn Planned Community, the City adopted a development agreement which states that no conditions more onerous than those contained in t1v) original county approvals for the Car,Yn Planned Community and Phase I (Tentative Tract 1254Z) will be applied to the project. Therefore, tha. conditions of approval for tha subject tract are consistent with the Pfanned Community Text and Tract 12642. III. RECCAMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a one -year extension otis time through adoption of the attac6d Resolution. Res Wer itted Brad City BB:BG :vc Attacnments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Wcation Map Exhibit "B" - Tract Map �,_. $eSQllltiQn Of urQVai ITEM D 4WIN-aze �t ` `*Dar*UJteAAt*;, inc. 1355 E. Cooley ,- 9rtVtc- Colton, Cagttbrnia 92324 (71 4) 825' J� ,f ...ii �_�; �• `�� May 1, 1587 Y?.O, 381 -01 City of Rancho Cucamonga ` Planning Division P- G. 'Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91J,30-0807 Attn: Bruce Cook, ' Dear Bruce, The TeL ative Tract Map foz Tract 12643 (Phase `l of the Caryn Project) is due to aspire within the next - 30`days. As the `m engineering representatives for Marlborough Development Company and Kaufman and Broad we are re$uestina=2a 12 month extension for this main Please, find enclosed a check for $62.00 to cover the fees for extension of the Tentative Map. Your time and attention regarding ` this matter is appreciated.,_. t Sincerely, . Robert P. King," ? -E. - Projeia'Engineer RPK /may CC. Paul Byrnes - Marlborough Dean Meyer - K&B _r.a :7 e x: i i E; 1, DEER CANYON DAY(C CANYON COUNTY OF SAN SERNARDINO \ / CITY OF RANCHO ; CUCAMONGA. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE CITY OF RANCHO •�- CH AFFEY CUCAMONGA COLLECB. OANYAt" AVE. i PROPOSED FOOTHILL FREEWAY ki T—we d;l at ui 0 a Y W Z EXHIBIT2 VICINITY MAP PROPERTIES AT MILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1 y NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCA�lOiNGA rrLE: PLANNING DIVISIaN E?CHIl3tT- SCALE: ID-3_ IAft RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12643 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension fcr the. a: ?ve- described project Pursuant to Section. 17.02.090; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above described 'tentative Tract. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the f011owing ring. ni 59V. A. The previously approved tentative Map is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, Specific Plans, Grd trances, Plans,. Codes and Policies; and, B. The extension of the Tentative Map will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Spe%A fic Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies; and, G. The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and, D. The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby gran s a me extension for: Tract Applicant Expiration TT 12643 ENTEC May 221 1986 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8Y: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad a er, epu y Deere ary f PLANNING CO ISSIt�'M �iiBS�iL TION No. Tenta, lJve jl%art I;6 ' 3 - EXTEC may Z ` I98T. Page 2 {. 7 I, Brad Bul l er, Deputy Se'c, Mary . of the Planning Co ni ssi on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certafy that the foregoing Resolution was duly sand_ regularly introduced,' passed, and adopted by the Planning Comaission of the City,af Rancho Cucamonga*. at a regular meeting of the Planning Comission hfild on the 27th day of °May, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERSt ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ANIL AML 1 I i r CIS QF AANCIiQ CUC 9MVNGA TAIP HATE: May 27, 1981 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS #T AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13305 - LEWIS e tMT—development of a rest en a su tv sTon oT --FO8 acres within the Terra Vista Planned Community- (Low - Medium Re.�Idential 4-8 dwelling -!hits per acre) int' 48 lots IocateI on the southvl2st corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive - APM: 227- 151 -13 I. BACKGROUND: This project was ^originally scheduled for Planning omn� mission review at the meeting of April 22,,, 1987. At that time the project applicant, Lewis Homes, requested a "one month exten.i_on from the Planning Commission to provide them the opportunity to more fully assess,.the - Street Improvement Phasing Program proposed by the Engineering Division as a part of this project. Staff has not received any written communication from Lewis Homes regarding their assessment of the phasing program. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning, Commission approve Tentative Tract 13305, subject to the conditions of approval, through adoption of the attached resolution and issuance of Negative Declaration. Resp ully s tte , rad Bu er Citg P anner BB:BC:vc Attachments: Staff Report of April 22, 1987 4 Il y' w DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT i `April 22, 1987 Chairman and Meeers of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Manner Bruce Cook, As„ociate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13305 - LEWIS HOMES - The xotal development o • a resi en s vision of 8;08 .acres within °the Terra Vista PlaW"' Communi -ty (Low- Medium Residential,.. 4 -8 dwelling units �, r acre) into 46 lots, located on the southwest, corner of' Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive - APN: 227- 151 -13. I. PPOJECT -AND SITE ',ESCRIPTIO.K: A. Action Requested: The approval of the subdivision reap, conceptual 51—U.—plan, conceptual grading plan, conceptual landscape plan, and building elevations for'the development of 48 single - family homes, and -issuance of 1-Aegative Declaration. B. Project Density: 6.8 dweiO ng units per acre., C. Surrounding Land Use and Zopnnin g. i3orEacanilTnne as mangle- femlly homes; Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units .per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Cowunity. , South - Vacant, planned as single- family homes, Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Community. East - Vacant, planned as single- family homes; Low - Medium esidential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Coamunity. West - Vacant, Vlanred as school /park site; Elementary School /Park within the Terra Vista Planned Community. D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - &W-Re 1um -kesidentiai (4-8 dwelling units per acre). North - Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). South Low- 'Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). East - Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). West - !.ow- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13305 - Lewis Homes ± April 22, 1987 Page 2 M f�>> €: Site Characteristics: The project area is bordered 'to the north an ems y Terra Vista Parkway, to �he south and.east by Mountain View Drive and to the west by a future park /school ;,site, The Trail System (trail type "U", see attached exhibit 5 ), abutts this tract along its westerl; perimeter.. The site - slopes from north to south at approxiwitely a 3% grade. rye sit >is bisected in a north to south direction by a na0ral dramnage No swale. strectures, significant natural landf`orms or vegetat {on currently exist on the site. II. ANALYSIS: A. General:, -, This tract is bordered along its westerly perimeter by a ty pe "D" Trait'::. The Traii System is a key, unifying elew -nt of the Terra Vista Planned Comity. The proposed minimum lot size is 4,000 square feet, with an average-lot area Of 5,100 square feet. In the past it has been the poliev of E` the Planning Commission to require full front yard landscaj`iqg i provided by the developer and decorative hardscape treataiylt applied to the driveway, for all projects with a designaiid - kvr7 , minimum lot area of 4,500 square feet or less. Lewis Horses has prpposed development of this tract wi- th their'.. :'Oxford" Series. The ,lard Series incorporates elements of , english architecture using steep pitched roofs with a ,:oldold the structure, and extensive use of wood trim on stucco siding. Five house plans are proposed, two one -story plans and three two -story plans. The Oxford Series has been previously approved by the Plannii;g Commsission and has been constructed with Tract 12670. The Oxford Series is also being proposed for Tentative Tract 13304 and Tract 12802 (amended). This project -is tha first project proposed for development -oltthin the northeast quadrant of the Terra Vista Planned Community. The northeast quadrant of Terra Vista is that portion of the Planned Community south of Base Line Road and north of the Greenway spine between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, The Area Drfl velopment Plan for -this portion of Terra Vista is on the agenda of tonight's meeting for the review and consideration of the Planning ommission (refer to g Item "141). B Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Tolstoy, eric , u er review-e3 this project at the Committee meeting of April 2, 1987. The Committee expres;pd concern over the lack of cul -de -sacs siding onto Terra Vita Parkway from the tract, but realized the impracticality of this design due to the small size and unusual configuration of this particular ti PLANNING COPMIISSIOR STAFF REPORT - TT 13305 - Lewis Homes April 22, 1982 r. Page 3 site. Hof ever, the Committee strongly emphasised the need for the incoriforation of side -on cul-de-sacs where ever posit":le in k the plann_'rfof future single fan! Ty projects slang Terra Vista Parkway. The Committee did recommend approval of this projec., ' subject to -e o ow ng: 1. The pros Aon of a larger property line radius at the intersection of Terra Vista Parkway and Mounta?n View Drive to permit improved visibility and better landscaping on the street side of the poperty line:. wall. The intersection treatment applied here should be similarily applied to the over three corners of this intersection as they develop. 2. The provision of block wails It all lots which rear onto the= Z7— imentary school site and park sites, as well as along the sides of the green space opining from the tract to the park site. These items have been included as Condities4s of .=royal on }he attached Resolution. (See Conditions 11, 12 & 13 of "Design Review ".) C. Street Improvement3: At the last Planning Commission meeting, ewes Homes expressed disagreement with a condition requiring the construction of Milliken Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base Lire Road for Tent, tive "Tract 13270, Prompted by this action, staff has prenared the following exhibits to explain staff's concern with circulation in Terra Vista. Exhibit "I" shows the status of projects within Terra Vista,, the status of street lwerov, aez'ts within TeriZt Vista, and t' Amprovements required for this Tract. Exhi,iit J" contains- -,� preliminary plan fer the construction of mlajor streets adjacent to and - within Terra Vista. It designal,es what portion of the mad-.-,e street shall be construct' ;.ith development in a given subarea. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical] Review Committee reviewed a project and ermined that, with the re ;"Inmended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent --with all applicable standards and ordinances. E. Grading _Committee: ine Grading Committee has reviewed the pro3P-t= and de- teerr,r,ned .that, with the recommended Conditions of Appr' t1, the project is consistent with ail applicable Star irds and Ordinances. F-4 ic PLANNING COMMUSION STAFF REPORT TT 13305 -Lewis Homes April 22, 1987, Pao h F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completud By the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impkcfs on the enviroMent as p result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS. In order for this project to be approved, the Planning omm 'st on must f� ;%d this project to be consistent with the Terra Vista Planned Community and the General Plan, and that this project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts. It must also be determined that the proposed use, building designs, and subdivision, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval are in compliance with all applicable rege' ations in the Development Code and the tlfrra Vista Community PI an. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a pub'ric hearing in e a y eport newspaper, tho'-)roperty posted, and notices were sent to a ,_vpertK�,, owners within 30a feat of the project site. - r V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract 13305, subject to the Conditions of`, Approval, through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of-a= ,:±gative Declaration *RKespctf 11 s it ted, er Gi ty P anner BB :BC:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "8" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G° Exhibit "H" Exhibi t "I" Exhi hi t u J" Resolution i - Area Development Plan for Northeast Wadrant - $jbdivision Map site Plan - Conceptual Gra'na Plan - Conceptual Landsk'ape Man Building Elevatiot.s • Type "D" Trail Stre4it Improvements for Project -.Area Iirtprovement Doundarier )f Approval with Conditions tt e L x U > 0 z z _emu^ 25 0 , -'— tmau�TftijvK low ON .No, 3�,A Wt­!A e L x U > 0 z z _emu^ 25 0 t �1•Is ':fF� t jRI[� iC■ � ... - �� aaa.auaat � Q� a fff I ' •w � � 'imp � IL cc Ic CA a ti� Ito - Y Y41Tnt�M � �� r R s .� !6 - I fit•, t u • �� 29- : .Wm. llLlt'1f. fit•, t u • �� S .Wm. llLlt'1f. 0 O �z V GR •r�3'�' CAC .•.N 1SV14311LLtl1N3t ��y vt - �- ' Y151A MOtl31 wnattapaonn »van _ lAt. _ -- fimV'Y �. +� o � � _ ;.-' � _y,� • � \ � � Gtr b _ �'. G taRa� j z r � ! 1� Z -.�2y Vim• l� + ; v 7L—%' 40 V < �0 F a� G— - GO ZIP i C. %Gel' 0. 3..VVQ1 elf VISIA V■U.. - - ------------- Li :t r! U3 T la 1- 6 > Om z u e, ad �. oamm �� urea ®m�i 8 lr \tV. .4 1.10 t t: • � lam.— p, p t �. a s... 1 •.'!. • .. .. ? S 'TI� on ON a 1 i. _ G� Y LXXRLS J6 'A ? f Ash qp W Y R M T � ,� �• b spy ;'® i® I e � \./ ♦�/�{ F o � � T \ \\ a • �z ,� � r'� fiR�M ♦luera lZu- ai+aaa per •��•W�a Lr��` teats 'Or xiVLt suanxu MAd Y{!f fi'lflf 7/1fN. V74Y31 -. a �a fill � ��'- �.. ^ ' ,: imps .w .iveao oxu°a eaevp k 8 lr \tV. .4 1.10 t t: • � lam.— p, p t �. a s... 1 •.'!. • .. .. ? S 'TI� on ON a 1 i. _ G� Y LXXRLS J6 'A ? f Ash qp W Y R M T � ,� �• b spy ;'® i® I e � \./ ♦�/�{ F o � � T \ \\ a • �z ,� � r'� _ y YLS /A Y>lSil 'NfIpYYp A'J YIN153Y1. (( 4 SYMS�� -w4 i]lepy i y Y � l zz yr9 i IL — ! �e iUYr Ijf �i t,�.\• -fit 140 toll ; . �� �._.� � ♦ ii X"!� «* t ti s3 t 11 P o a ;�c TENS 1 ';i- -• - ���� __ rn } � �'i�k t ► ? � .•"' � , -♦= y fir• s;� � t da.. ;: � ,tea :o.; ■ ,Q t - < a Fp C X�! �} Y j _•�.._ '�Ti � MATA � h l `� ` I'Y'"' � f 1 •I> No rift t W C t 9 / r wC N I rrae w .same wunoe w riw w �3 SSY1091 t ,t m tnEY1YnY '. r ` i VA I An Ilk t6.,' .. = "o y #; Li w ! 0 lit d f r anvo •v�wowvona ow>tivr asat -oqunu anuvaw�i va�rn v :aas s-� NY'W #dtL4gfIC7 'tY1467'Jk�1 ' ss ':��'�, i S yam!" xN.u•na. aaa�m i q t ,t m tnEY1YnY '. r ` i VA I An Ilk t6.,' .. = "o y #; Li w ! 0 lit d f r nm h i i' V B --�i a ® IIE E - ?A t 17 t I �� zj t a ia' El ' le ;a ' IS It Y 3� r G� Q O u 1MLPpY 77T R .�^ r� •�• < � < 3 a-1.16k KL Pl -K1-� Wy - 1.131W IRL N0413313 WMW3 Y3��M It Y 3� r G� Q O u WA U> O u 0 Yrp w•w�w 'tr�u '/mow MMIdi'M � G 10FfYtlN[ :1 L1 1 1 li J� Q« g a t e -if 4 t u 3 S, C �Q) o° U lu E.- u �Z = o IMC E-14 ri Il u 41 LL E-14 ri Il u z L�r F a ; C 0 0 °j 4� Lf W O A 06 W gg E- zo 7 4. SAM OO Z M g W i, O W a o 0" s.. :t, ��,., E,�. s= '� � ?t � � k ii 6 m r: i c 0 M A8 JIM CL x ar Gi .o 0 m � Q ,a 'C F O i r � O cat + i= 3C LL Syr, Vier .. U >_i g 4 na �Q O OM zu S z Al Wa C3 �� Li cTi B f m z t Q S2us �. U. l� I s 4 LE6E• ND PROJECT STATUS =In Process EMP C Approved IM Recorded Pinaled STREET STATUS s Existing Pavement s =Required for this Project CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGUCEMG DIMON i s i E LEGEND 1 —Area boundary, JL Area number AREA CONSTRUCTION LIMITS I Foothi;. Haven to Spruce and Haven — Foothill '_o Town Center 2 Foothill Haveu to Milliken 3 Foothill - Haven to Rochester 4 Roches! €s — Foothill to Poplar S Rochester — Foothill to Church 6 Rochester — Church to Base Line 7 Base Line — Milliken to Rochester 8 Base Line — Milliken to Mountain View S, Same as adjacent area &&pending upon where access is taken. 10 Milliken — Foothill to Base Lin_ 11 Spruce - Foothill to Elm 12 Most of this area is already conditioned or developed. 13 Haven — Church to Base Line GEMERAL RULES 1 All projects shall construct adjacent streets full width to include curb an the opposite side. 2 Streets shall be extended (full width) off —site far enough to provide two means of access. 3 Corner properties shall construct major streets per both adjacent areas, N ism SeaN in ital .- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONiyh, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13305 and DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13305, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Lewis Homes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 8,08 acres in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 8 dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Community located on the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive, into 48 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action nti May 27, 1987; and WHEREAS, the u;ky Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditiois set firth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Con SSion has read and consid;,•ed the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and,has considered other evidence presented at the Public. hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucartonga does resolve as follow�Y SECTION 1: The-- lanrli64 Commission makes the Zollowing findings in regard to e`fint� aG ve Tract_Oo. 13305 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific - plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of , development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. a -Zlp RESOLUTION NO. TT 13305 - Lewis Homes May 27, 19 87 Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment- and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION l; Ten�ative Tract Map No. 13305 a copy of which is attached hereto, isTere6y approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Dsysign Review 1. Each lot within the project shall have a minimum rear yard open area from building to properhy Line, or slopes /retaining wall of 151 with a 2% ,19pe or less.. A final detailed site plan shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Front yard landscaping is to be provided by the developer for all lots. Each lo;'shall be provided with a minimum of two 15- gallon trees in addition to street trees., shrubbery, ground cover, and lawn 'planted in combination to provide a pleasing and aesthetic environment. All lots shall be provided with a permanent, underground irrigation system. Final details shall 'be included on landscape /irrigation plans to be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits, 3. Each driveway shall receive special treatment in order to enhance the appearance of the street scene. Such treatment may include a band of brick, special concrete or border treatments in like materials. The driveway hardscape details shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of-building permits. 4. Corner sideyard fencing for all corner rots shall be constructed of a decorative block material. Details of the wall 'design shall be included on the submitted las:ascape /irrigation plans, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. 5. Corner sideyard fencing and /or retaining wall shall be set back a minimum distance of 5° from the back sidewalks. All retaining walls exposed to public view shall be constructed of a decorative block. 2 b. For all corner lots, the side yard between the sidewalk and the sideyard fencing shall be landscaped and irrigated by' the developer, 7. All wood fencing installed by the developer shall have any street facing exposures tr,.,dted either with water sealant, stain, or painted. e��. _ RESOLUTION N0. TT 13305 - Lewis Homes . May 27, 1987 Page 3 8. !Upgrade treatments shall be provided for any sid% or rear building elevation that is exposed to view from any public right -of -way. Plans detailing the extent of this upgrade treatment and to what lots they are to be applied shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of any building permits. - 9. A complete and detailed fencing plan inclvding both perimeter and property fencing shall be included on the landscape/ irrigation plans and shall be subject to the review,and approval of the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. Six foot high masorvary walls consistent with the existing design for perimeter walls within the Terra Vista Planned Community shall be provided along the tract perimeters adjacent to both Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive. These walls shall be staggered and offset to increase visual interest. Landscape 'easements maintenance will be required where perimeter walls encroach onto private lots, and are to be dedicated on the final map. Final plotting of all fences and locations of fill easements are to be determined prior to recordation of the final map. 11. A 6' higtj decorative block wail shall be provided along the tract's westerly perimeter where rear property lines lie adjacent to the ,- school /park site. This block wall shc:1 continue along the north property Line of Lot 14 and shall continue to a point equal to the front plane of the living area of the house. A C'' high decorative wrought iron fence shall continue from thins ;Taint to the back of the sidewalk. 12. A 6' high decorative block wall shall be constructed along the westerly side lot Line of Lot 15 from the intersection of this side lot Line with the rear property Line of said lot to the point where this wall will intersect with the return fencing from the garage to the side lot Line. A 6' high decorative .,nought iron fence shall be provided along the westerly property Line of Lot 15 from the point of termination of the block wall to the intersection of the side lot Line with the southerly lot Line of Lot 15. The wrought iron fence will continue along the southerly lot Line to its point of termination at the back of sidewalk. 13. A larger property Line radius shall be provided at the intersection of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive to permit intensified landscaping treatment on the street side of the property Line wall to enhance the visual quality of the street scene. The exact configuration this of property Line . radius shall be subject to the review and approval of both the City Planvier and the City Engineer. �y r RESOLUTION NO. - TT 13305 - Lewis Homes May 27, 1987 Page 4 Tentative Tract 1. Notice 'of intention to form and /or- join the lighting and landscaping district shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, 2. Terra Vista Masten Plan Storm Drain Line 4 -1 shall be constructed from Terra Vista Parkway to Deer Cr3ek flood Control Channel to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to occupancy of any buildings, 3. The following streets shall be construr;ted full width for the stated limits except that offsite Isiddrwalks . and parkway landraping may be deferred until development of the adjacent property: a. Milliken Avenue from Base Line Road to Foothill Boulevard including landscaped median, b. Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken Avenue to Mountain View Drive including landscaped median, and C. Mountain Vieww Drive from Milliken Avenue to Terra Vista Parkway. 4. Prior to recordation of the final map, a drainage study shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer demonstrating how the entire portion of Terra Vista east of Milliken Avenue will be protected from drainage from the north. If increased flows . are to be directed to Rochester Avenue, the report shall analyze needed protection measures for downstream properties. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY to RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McKie , Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, epu y ecre ary RESOLJTION NO. TT 13305 - Lewis Nomps May 27, 1987 Page 5 i I, Brad huller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of I Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Reso"Wtion was duly and 4 regularly introdl*,ce,d, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc &itongb„ at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMVISSIONERS: NOES; COMMISSIONERSz ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: j 1 L FF I C; LU LU 2 n n is BF j" X ztz lc S,3 N. - B. cz 4z r- n; I a---- all 821 a.— Jh ts Xc; Uyr I t Z4 2-4 -'z - rt= Gs blIzzom"wo xr 145 �.°.s Cg Aa. c °a'�:i�.+..`ou L�.P '�L.a$ a•e.. v bI Ya P °�,v° V w••� J D.� t•; E LYE L 2-1 `.T 3 Y= N ' L n�p Y4 °°ew "=gyL. wNO Lqq ^qN go- 'ten ta'� «q v 4�NC�p�LLV j�v �u°e �. 4 L •±� ^^��° O � mr a� •�� i Cpn i� +PN CA' V >> Nw Cp ti�PY ` °OC ^� LN 6N�. I. V.N '1V= -3* ry CCC• C.�NN ��—C�M`p.:.q.O �pp'C.Y N. �t f49 O6 a AO� 4V� Vy `} s 9gSa �^ To. 4AE,> g'•� +~ 5.z"NY °pN p.J�yy I•°+ .�Y LLC E �! �lV 6i Y cAl $JO" N OC YCO 6 F iH �O ~JYCI 4 SL�'• u w..iOR � ' aR a�$ 2°3�4yN Avg' �wELOgdB6�n b� 5i4 n� F+yY S95.WLU ^t wJN ` `jR'tl' . .CM2 C >Y TJ3�• Fd Y V Av avc9 w�p °N� ^ � S r =xs�� 'y' € s — y Y — i y� Ly 18 fi�JOg �N LJ ao b aH"C'Y Y V Uj i Y�..i >ie Vi�ISy Y fl-lan S «w..°.� M LF r� 1 � m �I � •1� � �� u $yeau a� gUC ��^ s = p.�c wr°YI� ■. Yi T�y"'y��'V Q1�ku! °p�� Y }!i• a0 • nL � M d t� A �� L L� � !�i L� �. V N V O Y S Y° Y S w •� c' pd. �a 'yx�gNfs Hs. •$1 =R °`G� �t E l p C ` L Y LC L. w a CN C N y N. S >� w fJ s� _V a4 YPCp �C4 Y r9P NWta p�aHy•C•1 -•p�wy 6'7 wV.� sir ^C71 •Nu\'sV,�C�M`. �$pwc y� Y H W °X S CL°CLC^�p6y CM spy C pc�!wYT•. jj N G V Y• S "d C= S yy • G Y ` --.I q �y PG C Y= rya, it6 V° Pik L`O WC rd�yM_O ACC �w a �e �pp °��,9y.�Lpp 19 .CCwt N Ar �9a Or a 4 q�N .�VOC YL� iC 6�w L6 V CuQ O NG �C� .7 4.�,.A. �n•�9 we Y° CN..i�tT OCp Yp.�g 6 mNv_ t�,I � p N f C� tJyOy N. L y.1 p V,A C,t pyV� �?�tE L.L pp �J EGOS N =q� CC! T�ac r�L SNtl ` NPVVf� Cii;� W 7a O YV.> yNN .6 J?puNYiVpt �V o,J,,YVq�F. q6A� C.Cp °C °C C p.Oir ^S V SL Cw w..9p: 00 LJ�j� Y 4gYE �rNn �rnc °�a vwiX cuxo nua y Y CN =c�.p aP u e. aZ o _. �. ». / N 1 •.r ^Uy �p Y Odd qIi FYI F. ^ ^>, VY Ci.b -J'= YYYTO � _C YYy F-9P V ye qS..N q1q G D� '�C Y�aOC�e �ONY T1 Lpp�OO w w`yar. •,s•.y nC Y~ '9Y T � „wl� °a.OL �� �1�D� t �„�Y eN� VuU a C >C WW1 O „HYbn YYL�"'N C� � `.p J�3�^M �pdA A qb •�” m 9 GGQ V N„ Od$S`[PS OppHY LLgYC�O C°YV�G� /��'qf 'pC 5��> 6 P URN Y�+V oN L yY y �. aln +OvY 27Cy ^M b }�. i•\Ci °iY.p�f. YV �Y y� xW �V1 °•' w�y�~N� =y14 `�YLY ` Q. ii ° A ° ;� \' �' u d i"� Y Y Y Y ►-q Y ..e Q �^ �r w G Y Y = +ft8 � N K2 ELI= . E yy Cp OireC U « m Y. w A� Y 6 c 1L 6 N 0 E G •• OQ Yy N ; Y �p � T. n>p $.�wA pyNN 6u L� ,Z �y O`` ��pr L� YjI o'O eG' a „ �C Eyy 8°+ L �O� C�„�4`y�a &;B 94 N. LYYT•L,C wC�p 2 ;y9 YyL O4 O O 7L. {! 6t' ` i »C S NnCy fy` eDS �6 ^D L TU V+�LD G ^ fir'.. �^ � • S„ „O y 'w C j. �� Y L .+•"<y v yf� 4 1-0 �' Q br�ypiyp-. `U�• G „b» ^O „� TJ U G 9y D0 Nq y +^ L�� • CzT�R,Ly aL� � 9L° .UiT e1 i -t aM u1rY Y c GG ape Y.Rryw CL y ^b L QA.r W CC G.U^e'.0 �� „L ri L yb L3 O1u T Ab C��e pq � } ■$; r -.R. �Q° V `y j �b G. L�� Ct�L A- ^.v RZL� V'. �� C� vQn yq �� N« �i° ncz^ L -A9 aN_ ,i`: °d c.„ g :'„' 'fig <yn.o <v> :° y rn.°+ <u cbL «'e.oV°..°•LS. �a� <NS.. C waa.•u;.+.�. �w7� ni 0 E 11 E t N N M O `yoo.�Q 5 5�= IN OtuYV• C C� CWN < '• ,x ,,-.. q qY u E • X V g g I IlF C . .J �V - - 0 00 3 4 4LC Y YCyyNV 4 4 y °I.t I IN p p f fY�. 6 � • � p u ^ y Y J Ye • -� � � �. O O ` � � 1 u = yO..V..' � �: C O Y • 4 � � - �.. qFUR y• p - jJ Y, C Cu Ali V VLM r . .+ a a w p -aC o + N.ii Y * *cppppY ^ 'F i �Y 4 4 + +- Ckit L WES� q J f f,�Yn b ^S ' iYy � - ■ ■ ■Oppp'''NC Lu�Gpsn_� C Ca�g ° gx �1 � q J �•wyy-= ` �^ VitiY �W U y ; _ _�- .� +C I I�SR W WN H H Y 1H qN� ` a US + w $ �6Va sw 79 is > 'e$ yY Y 6 O as `� Y1as 4 n a N L N - v � W Na �g 8' � Y vY Aei L ANC a E= �� r i^�_ V C V y u� u�wc v P � n■ � YZ U 3 9 - Y •L, L w a V RgpY� lit -Zvi j zy Y L w g J'E Y aa� 9 }^y �va`6 '^V L Ci'Y SIR,. L V th p�r E Z — a C So�9 Z aea c O i S V J L p y t :i = s�NX g�= n Eli 8 c a t l J J wO.0 Y � N n`Y a_Y`• �Na$� f.Y�O g�c I Is I°i $« �s xg N� 9 dL �o `saC. 6 O Y} No L E PIP � 9 - <0. W 33 .`g tp L 6 ac t °w w C ^ Y N ; Y P n' N Ya sit "'CQSSS Tp � u� L g« o -u �• OI tV s v X v n` .o - N V VO C i O d N� r° OIL 88 'u �a Y� a � �e �g aN� �Y acv M SO Y� y � W X N� a.at8+ Y 4. a � � l!_ Y� J.L. Y V — gYWw n �Yu 4 � �NwO N j $cY ++ V Or cY 3s'GCC" V�0 0 ii y� �z'4Y L Q L TQ Y•C`M «� C `` 7 M • O.. V (�j j'Q@ C. LU `Q« y�.`Mij O »L V L e•f Cu T»O mow. yy Y � �y� U ttt333 QC O.Y. ;'aOy ` ✓� y� R ;'i"i �•. S•••r rk so Y �i M, 000, ?Y y�yM.•'cyJ$ TO T31 a:s IS u o a AS I J-8 haip N IN O N O1 n. W j r^ z LE, C S� _ 1 s sus r� rr In 41 1 i =. eu i ,Y YFB oa gb' k Ji � SS {� }!! yak a: A" 30 3i L� ` j Tr& S yp�i8y. k 8 as �L -I6�ySY s b jj% i; «� 8 «gg_b �»•'$� xit UP 101 CO 0 —al -n d C mgr « •'O.1'iY r V+ Vii, $'o�ii c�� Ss a3u�+ S �`ogjli� a �°�Y `gg-„� 4. N 1•f C • N 1.1 ! Yi .p aY i. v r LA Eeea Fa; Y +yrL' F€ s ge 1". i O a �+ � nip $ ■ ^� �n +uCY L,}L 22 5�y..Ow —A+2 L °Y Lt !— = a4Y� 4L S r2N CG� P.wY N = —0. -.off m yip r .0 You S. � 4�y i�40 Q. 4�� 4r `• -1 � +Og� p� g.` a" a�y�. rw x<u iE i9.y w r'r ^°►u a'r Fn' cS9r <�°. .ioiic °i8 a rw1 ut�. <n.a z wl �•r w1d Yr� .mtg1 SE's_- r 1t" r Gw » n g uCa � qqY r h u t S a» pYC p Fy+CO YN`. L.-p Y i„- d u taW � r � —r g pd Ny Gi O rY v5 O ■ ari � e Y« y V'IIL A4Y Y 1115 <L - S �•r w1d Yr� .mtg1 SE's_- r 1t" r Gw » n g uCa � qqY r h u t S a» pYC p Fy+CO YN`. L.-p Y i„- d u taW o °.3 k ` t 9 u of u no S � E i.� N `4 .e a w >, .S v o gg N 't aoL3 BE-, 0 o w �tl �QyyC 4 m r O L c pn� M O b y o °.3 k ` t 9 o y rm u S � E i.� N `4 5.2. N 't BE-, o p�0 �QyyC ti- y O OYS �yy�� �LV Ell Cq u.0 °fi b t u P ^qC O� V ccJ � hN O�Y� CO CaM Rat a C60. YQ li f t M = C 1 Y r Y y Y Oo N V K N _p t�rL u0a � Ly��b` aaC Cp Y n. ■.' Z Z y F c fr a u 4 v O V� • Y �■� � t wV' 4�" y� y �Cy tr 1=Nr. =w 6W. I-S K! 4 a =''= by sN° ag o y rm u o Try°. Say ,w�Oy� 3 BE-, o p�0 �QyyC ti- O OYS �yy�� �LV rw Cq u.0 P ^qC O� V ccJ � hN O�Y� CO CaM Rat a C60. f t M = C 1 Im vii 1 Vr 1WUN%rr1V t.Ut>IH1Y1V1VL A �t Gt:11Q STAFF REPORT a � w. 1977 DATE: May 27, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of .the 'Planning Commission.- FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto K::ryuti'4, Senior Planner Alan Wah}en, Associate Planner SUBJECT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN - A public hearing and wor s op to consi er t e provisions of the Draft Foothill Bouievi -d Specific Pla:j'-" I. BACKGROUND At the May 18, 1987 special meeti:,;y the P1atin' Comnission reviewed the Cnrmunity - Design and Architecture Standards provisions and hear! y'completed an analysis of the Land Use regulations, At this meeting, the Planning Commission should complete the review ar Part III, Development Standards, with emphasi's on permitted uss. Provided for your review are the folYowing materials: 1. Land Use Summaries, in matrix farm. 2. Amended land UselDevelopmeit Standards (Because of larger format, these are distributed separately.) For the purposes of discussion, review af the Land Use Summaries is all that is necessary at this time. II. DISCUSSION: The amended Land Use charts provide the following cTianges: o A revised listing of uses, more consistent with activities listed in the City's Development Code. In addition, the dining activities have been listed together under restaurants. o Changes to the approved activities as recommended by the Commission have been noted. In addition, staff recommendations are underlined for Commission consideration, as follows: ITEM F �I PLANNING CQMMISSION STAFF RVORT Foothill Boulevard Specific P1..41 May 27, 1987 ;. Page 2 a f Authorized Conditional Use Use Permit Planning Commission X p e Staff Recommendation, x o Staff recommendations are included to provide more consistency among the Subareas, and to make the Plan morn comaatible with 0 the City's Development Code. The Commission will note the increase in activities for the regionally related commercial district (RRC) of Subarea 4. the Commission should advise staff if these uses are appropriate and ,if n, the following development provision can provide sufficient guarantee for regionally related types of development; * "Commarcial /Office uses may be located in the RRC district only with the concurrent development of one (1) major regionally related anchor business of at least AML 15,000 square feet per site or project." F Finally, the Planning Commission should review the site development standards (setbacks, minimum lot size, etc.) for each subarea and activity noted (refer to pages 9 -6, 9 -10, 9 -11, 9 -16, 9 -16, and_9- 20) and advise staff of any desired modification. III, RECOMMENDATION; It is recommended that the Planning Commission complete its Initial review of the Praft Specific Plat and provide consultant and staff with directia,i for amendment where needed. The hearing shouid'be cc4itinued to June 24, 1987 at widch time T revised Plan will be sut',mitted for Planning Commission review and action. Resp ally s t Brad B le" City Tanner BB:AW:ns Attachments: Land Use Summaries, in Matrix form j Modified Land Use Chart and Site Development Standards (Distributed Separately) FX� a 'HAV 1SVV3 s W cc co ®' 'X '3AV VQNVM113 , UA _ l� a LU OL Ix w LU '3AVi N3AV H � *3AV 33HU111 W 0 Z 0 '3AW GIV91lfDHV/ '3AV NVWI 13H w 4 W loc ' '3Ad GUVA3NIA to -3 V, V331V B tu ic m fA ,3AVf 3Rt?us r i. F - IV " 1 v Sbarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four SC CC 0 lit P SC CC 0 W SC CC CO LtR MR U M/R CC RRC tR LI l:llR x x x x x Si Ares x x x x z x x x z x it 0 x 0 a P, g X x z x z x 'Studios x x X x x x x x x _ Xf — x I Weight x 0 x 0 X 0 0 X xf a 0 D 0 D 0 O rcycles, s): ry repair a 0 O 0 z x z z x ting, stery) D 0 X x x x x x x x x z x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Xf x D a 0 gQ Q Q g x x x x Ly ices x x x A x x x x x EoreS eatarial) x x x x. X x x x x x x it x x x x x x x xf z x x X x x X x x x x xf •y basis) x x x X shvents x x x x x x x x x x x, tavern) ,ainmt a D 0 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q bowiiug 0 D 0 D 0 O 0 0 tennis O 0 a 0 O 0, a a bspitais Q 0 0 0 O a Q 0 x x x x x x x a x a G 0 O Q Q D 0 ood x x x x x x x X x Xf X Am x x x x x x z x x x x x z x x z x x x x r xxx x x x x� n IV " 1 v Cr C l�1 Subarea One SC CC 0 tR P Subarea Two SC CC 0 ff Subarea Three SC CC CU LM MR U MU /R Subarea Four CC RRC MR ! I M/R x x x x x x x K x x X x x x x x X x X xx x s x x ( X x x X X X Xe x X x x x Xt x x x x x x x x x X x 0 x 0 k x x x x x X X 0 a 0 a L` 0 x x x_ x x x x x x Jim 0 X a x x x 0 x X x x x x x x xx x x xt x X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x x x x x* x x x x x _x x Xf x z x x x x x x x x W .I a 0 x x 0 oax 0 0 x 0ax 0 a 0 x a a oox ° 0 0 x a ab x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x a x x x a x x x x x x X x x x x x x x x x x x CD x x x X x X x x X x x X x ox Qz ax x x x a ° x 0 0 X X a ° x X 0 Q x X x x x x x x x x x x x x k x Cr C l�1 PERMITTED AND CONDITIOWL INU: Subarea 0 Q Q bt Movie theater 0 0 Q Q On Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four Office and Administrative Uses - SC CC D MR P SC EC 0 MFR SC CC CO LMR MR U 11) /R CC WC TR Ll MU /R Administrative, Business, and Professional Office X X X X X X X X X X X X: X Business and Office Services X X X X X X X X Finance Services and Institutions X X X 0 X X. X X X 0 X X Interior Decorating Farms X X X X X X X X X X Medical /Dental Offices and Related Health Clinics X X X X X X X 0 Y Xa Optician and Optometrical Shops X X X X X X X O X Xa�� i('altars and Real Estate Dffices X X X X' 4 X X X; X X X X+ X Travel Agencies X X X X X X X X X X X %e X Subarea One )Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four Residential Uses - SC CC 0 MR P SC CC 0 lift SC CC CO LMR MR U MIR, CC RRC tR LI MU/R Single Family Detached X X X X' Single Family Attached (duplex, triplex, fourplex) X X R X X X X Multi - family Dwellings X X X X X X Ancillary Residential Uses: a) Row -care facilities (6 or less) X X X X X X X b1 On -site private recreation ' facilities % X X X X X- X Accessary Uses: a1 Accessory structures TX— X X X X X X bT Hine occupation X X X X X X Subarea One Subarea Two JSubarea Three Subarea Far Public Uses - SC CC U MR P SC cc O MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MlIR CC RRC MR LI MU /R Transit Facilities Public Utility Installations X Industrial Uses - One Subarea Two ISobarea Three Subarea Four I MR P SC CC 0 MHR SC CC CO LtR MR U M IR I CC RRC MR LI MU /R AWL `.✓ 1 Subarea one S Subarea Two i isubarea Three S Subarea Far Entertainment and Cultural Ow - S SC CC 0 MR P S SC CC O tM I I SC CC CO LMR MR U M IR C CC RRC MR LI KIM Arcades 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 Cal tural /Artist.Ezfiibitfs - al Indoo-� gallery and art sales X X 0 X X X X X X X W Outdoor art exhibits X X 0 X X 0 X X it 6 6 Discotheques — O 1p O O O 0 0 0 X X X Theaters, at Dinner theatre 0 0 O - -h-UL- On Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four Office and Administrative Uses - SC CC D MR P SC EC 0 MFR SC CC CO LMR MR U 11) /R CC WC TR Ll MU /R Administrative, Business, and Professional Office X X X X X X X X X X X X: X Business and Office Services X X X X X X X X Finance Services and Institutions X X X 0 X X. X X X 0 X X Interior Decorating Farms X X X X X X X X X X Medical /Dental Offices and Related Health Clinics X X X X X X X 0 Y Xa Optician and Optometrical Shops X X X X X X X O X Xa�� i('altars and Real Estate Dffices X X X X' 4 X X X; X X X X+ X Travel Agencies X X X X X X X X X X X %e X Subarea One )Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four Residential Uses - SC CC 0 MR P SC CC 0 lift SC CC CO LMR MR U MIR, CC RRC tR LI MU/R Single Family Detached X X X X' Single Family Attached (duplex, triplex, fourplex) X X R X X X X Multi - family Dwellings X X X X X X Ancillary Residential Uses: a) Row -care facilities (6 or less) X X X X X X X b1 On -site private recreation ' facilities % X X X X X- X Accessary Uses: a1 Accessory structures TX— X X X X X X bT Hine occupation X X X X X X Subarea One Subarea Two JSubarea Three Subarea Far Public Uses - SC CC U MR P SC cc O MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MlIR CC RRC MR LI MU /R Transit Facilities Public Utility Installations X Industrial Uses - One Subarea Two ISobarea Three Subarea Four I MR P SC CC 0 MHR SC CC CO LtR MR U M IR I CC RRC MR LI MU /R AWL `.✓ 1 Subarea One )Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four Residential Uses - SC CC 0 MR P SC CC 0 lift SC CC CO LMR MR U MIR, CC RRC tR LI MU/R Single Family Detached X X X X' Single Family Attached (duplex, triplex, fourplex) X X R X X X X Multi - family Dwellings X X X X X X Ancillary Residential Uses: a) Row -care facilities (6 or less) X X X X X X X b1 On -site private recreation ' facilities % X X X X X- X Accessary Uses: a1 Accessory structures TX— X X X X X X bT Hine occupation X X X X X X Subarea One Subarea Two JSubarea Three Subarea Far Public Uses - SC CC U MR P SC cc O MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MlIR CC RRC MR LI MU /R Transit Facilities Public Utility Installations X Industrial Uses - One Subarea Two ISobarea Three Subarea Four I MR P SC CC 0 MHR SC CC CO LtR MR U M IR I CC RRC MR LI MU /R AWL `.✓ 1 Subarea One Subarea Two JSubarea Three Subarea Far Public Uses - SC CC U MR P SC cc O MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MlIR CC RRC MR LI MU /R Transit Facilities Public Utility Installations X Industrial Uses - One Subarea Two ISobarea Three Subarea Four I MR P SC CC 0 MHR SC CC CO LtR MR U M IR I CC RRC MR LI MU /R AWL `.✓ 1 Industrial Uses - One Subarea Two ISobarea Three Subarea Four I MR P SC CC 0 MHR SC CC CO LtR MR U M IR I CC RRC MR LI MU /R AWL `.✓ 1 PEMITTEQ 4W,CoOhlw US$S r� .Q Su4area Three : Sa6area,f'au- lbtel Uses — 1 SC M 0 R P Subarea Two SC M 0 fM SC CC CO UR MR U MYR CC RkC M Ll � E /R f)atBl Facilities (major) _ X Ancillary uses3 a) Beaat�y/B bw Shop X 6) Cafes X C) Cat ers SetViCe$ dt - Cocktail Lange % el Conference/Convention Facilities ?I Florist Shops Shops hiOfft h �epap��itwiIIt42 j$t�B5 X i) Pharmacies X J) Restaicant5 unit dotttl X k) Tourist Worsation z 1) Travel kencies X LL. r !•. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c MO MEMORANDUM F.. 9Z Z: t DATE: May 27, 1987 TO: �airman and Members of,the Planning Commission FROM: j K~ Brad Buller, City Planner BY: l Alan Marren, Associate Planner SUBJEC \FOOTHILL 30UL[VARD SPECIFIC PLAN ,y J Due to the 1�,fge= size of the land use charts the Foothill Boulevard� � Specific ' Plam!! er6rt and attachment. have been copied under a separate r cover. P'ieasei3'-efew to this infora,4'"ton for Agenda Item F. 3 K] E DATE: TO: FROM; By. SUBJECT:. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiMONGA. ���nr STAFF REPORT , ar r May 27, 1487 wn Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission' Brad Buller,'Gity Planner Bruce Cook, Aspociate Planner ERVIRONMERTAk ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRAal`-'' 304 - LEWIS a = "tFie` ev lopment of a residentia su division of 17.13 acres: located within the' Terra, vista Planned Community. (Lo4 - diva4 Residential, 4-8 ing units per acre) into 59 'lots, located an the na��hwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive - APR 227 -151- 13, I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action. Requested: The approval of/ a subdivision map, conceptual �ip oz plan, conceptual gr4ding plan, conceptual landscape plan, and building elevations for the development of 59 single family homes, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 6.4 dwelling units per acre. f C. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin Nor - Vacant; planne as attached/detached single - family - homes; Medium Residential (4 -14 dwelling units per acre) within, the Terra Vista Planned Community ; South - Vacant, planked as single - family homes; Low- Me(.. Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre),Within the Terra Vista Planned Community East - Vacant, planned as single - family homes; Low- Medium Residentiai (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) withsa the Terra Vista Planned Community West - Vacant, planned as multi - family apartment complex; Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Community ITEM G y PLANNING C"I$S10N STAFF„ REPORT TEWATIVE TRACT 13304 - C6IS HOMES M,ay 27, 1987 Page 2 I 11 0.. General Plan Designations: rojec ite -Lower- e3ium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per Acre) North - Low- iedium Residential (4-8 dwelling units -per acre) South - Low- Medfuw Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) East - Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Best - Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) E. Site Characteristics: The project area is bordered to tKt north by vacanE I an planned as a future attack-'q/detached single - family development, to the south by vacant land planned as single- family residential (TT 13305), to the east by Mountain View Drive, and to the !mot by a planned, multi - family apartment complex (TT 13272). The site slopes from north to south at approximately a 3 percent grade. The site is bisected in a north to south direction by a natural drainage swale. No structures, significant natural landforms or vegetation currently exist on the site. 11. ANALYSIS• A. General: This tract is bordered along its westerly perimeter y a pe "D" trail (see Exhibit "J "). The trait system is a key, unifying element of the Terra Vista Planned Community. The proposed minimum lot size is 4,000 square feet, with- an average lot area of 5,100 square feet. In the past, it has been the policy of the Planning Coamissi�n to require full front yard landscaping provided by the developer and decorative hardscape treatment applied to the driveway for all projects with a designated minimum lot area of 4,500 square feet or less. Lewis Homes has proposed' devel opment of this tract with their "Oxford" series. Five house plans are proposed, two one - story' plans and 4hree two -story plans. The Oxford series has been previousl; approved by the Planning Commission and has been constructted with Tentative Tract 12670. The Oxford series is also being proposed for Tentative Tract 13305 and Tract. 12802 (Amended). This project is lo..tted within the northeast quadrant of the Terra Vista Planned Community. The northeast quadrant of Terra Vista is that portion of the Planned Community south of Base Line Road and north of the greenway spine, between. Milliken and Rochester Avenues. The area development plan for this portion of Terra Vista was approved by the Planning Commission at their meeting of April 22, 1987. This project is consistent with the Area Development Plan as approved by the Planning Commission. 6 •Z. v PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13304 - LEWIS HOMES May 27, 1987 Page 3 B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Commit �)e (Emerick, Eller) reviewed this project on April 16, 1987. The Committee accepted rear -on lot configurations at the tract perimeters for this project to be consistent with the design of Tentative Tract 13305 across Terra Vista Parkway to the south to result in a symmetrical and balanced corner. However, the Committee reiterated their commitment to design projects that open up vistas along the streetscape, and strongly emphasized the need for the incorporation of site planning techniques, such as 0 de -on cul -de -sacs, to achieve this goal of an opened ano varied street scene. 'The Committee did recommend approval of thi;5 project, subject to t e o ow U.: 1. Modify tract boundary to show a trait adjacent to the north lot line of Lot 25. This will provide a trail connection from this tract and the future tract to the north. ,'«is trail should be constructeu',to trail type`'rl standards. 2. House plots on corner lots-a'-,, project entries (Lots 1 and 59, 13 and 14) should be designed to maximize rear= yard setback to visually open up the corner to enhance the> quality of the streetscape. 3. Provide a larger property line radius at the intersection of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive to aerait increased areas of landscaptag on the street side of the perimeter wall to enhance the quality of the streetscape. These items have been included as conditions of approval on the attached Resolution (see conditions 11, 12, and 13 of "Design Review "). C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project to ditermine that, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. However, the plans do not indicate fences on the tract perimeter to the west or north. The plans also do not indicate complete property line fencing.. Staff recommends fencing be required (see Condition No. 9). D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee has reviewed the project and determined that, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with all appliUable standards and ordinances. 6_Z3 PLANNING C0M%SSTON STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT :.3304 - LEWIS HOMES May 27, 1987 Page 4 E. Environment- Assessment: Part I of the initial Study has been comp e e y e app cant. Staff has completed Pa "t Ii cf the Environmental Checklist and found no significant s ^ts,on the �.. environment as a result of this project. IIi. FACTS FOR FINLIINGS. In order for this project to be approved, th=., ann ng Comm ss fon test find this project to be consistent with the Terra Vista Pl nhed Community and the General Plan, and that this project will not be detrimental 'to adjacent properties or cause signifioant..adverse impActs. it must also be determined: that the proposed us%" building designs;?.and subdivision, together,, with the recommended Conditions of Approval are in cvApliance 'Witft all applicable regulations in the Development Code and the Terra Ci ta' Community Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing to The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent all property owners Within 71.0 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Teintaflvo Tract 13305, subject to the conditions of approval, through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Res fullysujmitted, Bsad i City Tanner BB:BC :te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Terra Vista MAster Plan Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C "' - Ar°a Development Plan Exhibit "D" - Subdivision Map Exhibit "E" - Site Plan Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - W.1ding Elevations Exhibit "H" - Conceptual Lan(,, cape Plan Exhibit "I" - Street Improvnts for Project Exhibit "`J" - Trail Sections Resolution of Approval with Conditions �I d z 19 to ILI VA FTV = I ig I lit Rig Sal rg, v r rum Fk- t H SL 71, A3 46 Lt • Jz ow. .. G Yxti 1r.. 32 t 1•3 ari m � YiA'�iN��D ir�11YNd't �n i2zt rt z t� u a ta. a eeo r Y a Fi- F-7 inner - � � s� YYR [1YYrl/ YtLL'YY e+atravn u+ i .``w-_��i... HOC[• OH 1;RY134LLr1NiL �7dSt- � Y�HU31, f _µ M-- ,mer Y a Fi- F-7 inner - � � s� t v11+ 1 do X031 I O anmai In zz yf o < I r lawr� .Rr' S 3r > i ice' ver PY++�ii aM1•inv '__. _ e _ L- t "'� awswrti�rm sc.n .v.waw saw •.er af[ t0[[I 1]fN13N•r1/t3! 33 V-1 •sVlxs•X Anse nxr SIA YYF31 ..ter t � L IsnY�'voNONY7m oNaf•+W _�i�_ _�� {{ •if6Y MCIMb. NmflrS�l xii � C } �'�j � C�.1 $�i ' y 9lRCw 1x w^IS ataMp al �� •�� • ii++���� Li wtR ON d]YPt aMIVlNil � i i � Md81xl Yi7id ,_wctk'oNxlYyy aM1[LY1Na1. � l w k NJ Y O � � SiF:ft � � e T � ' S _ •C� Vim, (t ,! Pit °'y��i`,. ($lk T How F m e .- o 1. '. �'r Pr it It Of w OA it LU ta q�q i yC a a Y t i 1 liV7 ti9NCNVaN PW�NVr i(i� ^!/.. w_ :w Vd9/!t r3lil NY1A'Il:� QlTtY39N y r.Aii °M .fNn.. Nr.�uaa � it a :RI i 1 x � to ��o� y+ �7(�dit ✓V r1� �i r EiC •• � vVG�33 ��: T. ii��ii TTtt�� �:� td` '`y,,'�.....- �"�.!�'"�,{c"' � ..,.yam• ,.. _�. i ., ..� � (. ul a It . J �� ._ t.,._.-- '_�*�.�- _`yam•• s �nE i� : � � ��p VISTA �/''� .��• 1. o i ut +! O 0 f i z le' f a'iaYr norfow wrai°iw ... +rv.t.xu auwvN � _ zr- — � :�YQ -a tYati 'pp UVLl 1NLY1N31r NY1l 3ttYNrvNO pMtl T �{ 0 VAM Vzon ONIaYt9 ANYNIMfTINI S YIN iG i .r rr i y z..- ��` I•n. v +1 j C z r 1 '± z k•ly.�.- ��r i5iI =� ' OM e� a • <. •f Iii ` �;, Yid °< # I 01 ^� \ rv- t `° sFde � mac. n'� s m•y`�!� r 1 fm 3t�Jy. Z _ . _ ✓ ;.� is U VIIe, lid„ "2 ♦•i ;, r _ ¢ J`PABEd1 1..- IWeM�YY tmrw�r�p bra i M {�ip9RY }!O t!{514 {{Nii l! N 8 W �3�Y ' 13 VISA v si ,Ott4'Otl l3fil.lYl,lp1 1-,tl •YYM: t,011t�Ti 8 W �3�Y 8 H y :yyy� oo l P s V> ®° Ox H 8'' G i B E3 -/Y I r7rtT Lx ., wwoarr�sa:s�teerii ti Pq i -T Ej R'l r ka E3 o KI ti 1 i3 t. 0 LU LU I.- If a -17 -4� 14- 0 > W IC U. 41 DO z 7 a -17 -4� 14- 0 > W IC U. I Au C) U, 03 w 0 C MOO z 0 U. iy 6 ` :Sr - r o.w L? Yl$ /a r1F3l�1 wouvnuar,usr xrsi gun, s ! ^J■ &' - aa¢.,»rt�..ut,riM.. •ill -l'NL t i� ` i i 0 ti t 4 JEBI ~� U> VE31 U U4 Z R-+ Z 8 t U44 C m 1 f "1 Ysl b Y� �� YA f 4 } / i - Ti'fi1d3�1{O� L I - reeevouurv.uuv.ru t 1 f "1 Ysl b Y� �� YA f 4 } / i t _ z L y _ PARKWAY _ wv°, W wri ?^ uZiQ w$ TERRA VISTA PLMNED CQW.11 IT1 PROJECT AND STREET STATUS N Seale in lust HM 1500 PROJECT NC. 7"R 13304 PrWWl iminary Completeness �F ti TRC xis fi _ PC Recorded Finaled LEGEND: PR©JECT STATUS In Process ® P C Approved CM Recorded 5M Finaled STREET STATUS Omm xrsting Pavement w 60 Required for this Project 1. , 444 It rem — Fifll a to*4 Z, ?'errallicf4 Prfjy - it 3, MOL4ni*14 141r;it It 3&llV. Yd al lrPR, I CITY OF ITEM: —71 KANCHO CUCA4IONGA TITLE. PLC" NENG DIVE.UNN 6 �l a EXHIBIT= �E RE SCALE 4 W ` ' e'er� OX v g Q i4 caw y w co RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF yTME CITY OF RANCHO CUC& i�NGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13304 AND DESIGN RWE W THEREOF WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13304, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Lewis Homesq applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho, Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, uescribed as 11.13 acres in the Low- Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned'Community located on the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountai' Vfii;«= =Drive into 59 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for pu51-i c hearing and action on May 27,_1987; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommend4d approval of l�eJMap subject i to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the'yPlea::ainq Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and.,,ihas considered other evidence presented at,the public hearing. how,, THEREFORE, the 'Planning Commiss1on of City of Rancho i Cucamonga does resolve as follows; SECTION lz The Planning Commission make3 the following findings in regard to e�aETv`e Tract No. 13304 and the Map thereof: (e) The tentative tract is consistent with, the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Pian, Deveiopmeiit erode, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their f,abitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to, cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict wi,ah any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13304 - LEWIS HOMES May 27, 1987 Page 2 - {g} That this project will not create adverse impacts on, the enviro °,ment and a Negative :_Declaration is issued, SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. YA304 a copy of which is attached hereto and design ,.review thereof, is hereby ipp,-cved subject to all of the following condition's and the attached Standard Conditions; Design Review: 1. Each lot within the project shall have a minimu.n rear yard open space from building to property line, or slope /retaining wall of 15 feet with a 2 percent slope or less. A final detailed site plan shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Front yard landscaping is 'to be provided iy the developer for all lots. Each lot shall be provided with a minimum of two 15- gallon trees in addition to street trees, shrubbery, ground cover, and lawn planted in combination to p?ovide a pleasing and aesthetic environment. All lots shall be provided with a permanent, underground irrigation system. Final details shall be included on landscape /irrigation plans to be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Each driveway shall receive special treatment in order to es)hance the appearance of the street scene. Suet treatment may include a band of brick, special concrete, or border treatments in liKe materials. The driveway handscape details shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Corner side yard fencing for all corner lots shall be constructed of a decorative block material. Details of the wall design shall he included on the submitted landscape /irrigation plans, dnd shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Pl anaer. 5. Corner side yard fencing and /or, retaining walls shall be set back a minimum distance of five feet from the back of sidewalks. All retaining walls exposed to public view shall receive decorative tre&; ment. 6. For asi corner lots, the side yard between the sidewalk and the side yard fencing shall be iavdscepr;d and irrigated by the developer. • Y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT-13304 - LEWIS HOMES May 27, 1987 Page 3 7. All wood fencing installed by the developer shall have any street facing exposures treated either with water sealant, stain, or painted. d. Upgrade,treatments shall be provided for any side or rear b441,ding elevation that is exposed to view from any publid,right -of -way.. Plans detailing the extent of this up�jrade treatment and to what lots they are to be applied shin','; be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of t any building permits, 9. A complete and detailed fencing plan forperimeter and property fencing, including a fence along the north tract boundary and a fence between private : yards and trails, shall be included on the landscape /irrigation pians and shall be subject to --,%) t; +e review and approaa? of the City PlannE.e prior to issuance of building permits. 10. Six -foot high masonry walls consistent with tae existing design for perimeter wails within the Terra Vista Planned Communi�y shall be provided along th_ MW tract perimeters adjacent to both Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive. These walls shall be staggered and offset to increase visual interest. Landscape maintenance easements will be required where perimeter walls encroach onto private lots, and are to be dedicated on the final map. Final plotting of all fences and location of all easements are to be determined prior to recordatioi). of the final map; 11. A larger property line radius shall be provided at the intersection of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive to provide intensified landscaping treatment on the street side of the property wall to enhance the visual quality of the street scene. The exact configuration of this property -line radius shall be subject to the review and approval of the City_Planne; and the City Engineer. 12. The tract .boundary shall be modified to include a trail type "C" adjacent to the north lot line of Lot 25 to connect Street "A" with the westerly trail type "D ". This greenbelt may be of an interim nature with its final design subject to modification with development of the vacant land to the north. e -Z& }A P �1NNILL� .yEOMM„.SSSON RESOLUTION NO. . a TENTATIVE TRACT 13304 - LEWIS HOMES May 27, 1987 Pa4e r f. M 13. House plots an corner lots of project entries (Lets I and 09, 13 and 14) shall be `designed to maximize rear yard setbacks to visually open up the corner to enhance the quality of the streetscape by providing 18 -foot garage setbacks from back of sh:dewal k. Tentative Tract: I.,.., Notice of intention to form and/or join the Lighting and Landscaping District shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the. map or issuance of ' buildtgg permits, whichever Occurs first. 2. Terra Vista - Master 'Plan Storm Drain Line 4 -1 shall be constructed from Terra_ Vista` Parkway -to, peer Creek Flood Control the CKannel to satisf` ci: on of the City Engineer prior to occupancy -of any ' buildings. `6e 3. The following, streets shall constructed full width for the stated limits except that off -site sidewci'ks and parkway landscaping may be deferred until development of the adjacent property: a. Milliken Avenue, "from Base Line Road to Terra Vista Parkway, including landscaped median; <<F b. Terra Eosta Parkway from Milliken- Avenue to Mountain View Drive, including landscaped median; c, Mountain View Drive from. Terra Vista Parkway to Base Line Road; and d. Base Line Road fron Milliken Avenue to Mountain View Drive to include full south road bed, landscaped median island, and 28 feet of pavement for the north road bed. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of the cost of improvements for the portion north of the street centerline from future development on the north side of Base Line Road. e -Z& PLANNING CO ISS' 4H R�{1TION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT LE4IS HOMES May 27, 1987 Page 5 4. Prio► to recordation of the final map, a drain.�A study shall be provided nd ` approved by the City Engineer demonstrating how the entire portion of ' Terra Vista Parkway east 'of M111,1ken Avenue will be protected from drafnage,tg the north. If increased flows are tol;be directed to Rochester Avenue, the report shall analyze needed protection measures for dowrnstreaw properties. APPROVED AND ADOPTER THIS 27TH DAY OE MA`!,,1987, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI Tw OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: - Larry T. McNiel, Chairmar o, ATTEST: Y Brad Butler, epu y,_;aecre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly imcrodaced, pasged, and adopted by the Planning„ Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting --of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1987, by the following vote -to. -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ,_'' H • V W C CD d 4 �F L —.2 c> �T ri 6 g,� nv�o to °vim: 010 c. Zi�i y;a� °sO1oa c 7U b�yW N ♦n YY yn. 6y V .C.t YON �r�F ��- bYO=,ac g /LpC�Q OyS! LuY CCVCA u l U yp ^Y °O.^ N4� rL.D1.rL ..U. a =�� Y °r F+O M•"V '°^M.� 4�p��� pYy aO�Y �-,a ZZ €uN sy�uli mob a''��L�Y YcQO �: riL u-r}. y�c IS §'y9xpg� c o N c, = O y iCY P�{ OU`Ua°�0'e =.apiu y € ^pye CLi== oe° `.N'�5 0p R�bNCt fayt NO C% �U 4.yN �Cpp V�y�i asYN ^C.— Q N "ICS °L1�. tL dQ` "` ■Yn �� N6ii VM 1 - NL�`(O4 pyS Y• T�! MU 4c K ii l , y Y LH_xC YF x ... yyyC MM+Y`� pCU ^� V,tc Opq►gpV_. LNG! LYE• •�{. Fp �F Ot LT S. +12. FGIY. °Y 6.r YN G9 x.NLYS+ OON YY44Y tM+ O 6H a S O S H O O Z O V u K°c o N i a a Z Y 4` cc U v �• O r i N+ b N Q Syr +°' aN 4`l.�r pi Cy •� �� n a. «C� �N.. $ °chi y�at[ YN° U O 4 ♦° �• �w yy l wY M Z's ¢ yy C � b `. j N N c �a u ^�GGG uo 4 °pp cY Q N N y r y L S^ Y O � C C _.cO xr. C �Yf^N -iU ^£y g E y N � _a 3 L+ ° e -2i '1 �J 12 Y� ` 4 A E Q 2 V W 7 �utC 49 NL a C ?� rn iZl^ A .Yw V _EE C �^ m y r u L ru Q�S so °mow NL WCUOL y��. _ ss' c oa V y A ^`. N S ^ 4 4 ^^ ^ Q N L J 4c vu pi�N q4� N v a^qC N N q @ } ME. ^TOgM a gP. ^� Luyn C 15- - o ^,ao YC OT VuO CY � ^,Y va�E L'-o ci E?Gtp N6 yY■ 0 • Y V C N C r � 6Ntl V yad ~ V� IL b iO IOV -Z 6` cpuq iZl^ A .Yw V wOV1C b� Y gm`AY N ^ Y j T pa ��$N °^ T � u G V y A ^`. N S ^ 4 4 ^^ ^ Q N L J uN N C C q^ ^ � v O^ t uSj va�E L'-o ci E?Gtp N6 HrNG 1 ^i w V L U C M� u �N 9q L.On Y L gs d 6 ° G�...p. KN AN a.L qr 6 L N.,.,yp us ^�u tN -o rw. Y ✓ C V il.�Y.... K �t i ^9 cNc q .t6 L y QO N 23 E 9 0.'Y � 4 N ♦ L L V L C� � A F N~ N L G Camay VyO gOYY.� C�.,B� yC,. Yy�L G {YCtM gqC pN �WQC V. YCCY V r �Ya`u L�OI�l MO4Tl vLyN � ■ pO� CY..jI�� OLCN V.4 Y Q C9. ^VVV L4Y.6�O�Y ^ptl V�L�C GwY 1MGIV S1 CW N�YS�6 W S � C ! L Nu� L� m; U luz .r pp, W = Y � y vbo 6s' _ C�' q= a YL .�YQCC C� e ^��k C N L aN.- .u.Y. YU r ^y 6 .-. OW 1r -� ptiyOy ui4'4i x�' V`OUu aa n C n V '� it Q.oL cCcE� ru,Z �o Lr44rg L'$_u xi Eac NV��u �O� H ^ W9 ^qJf L -N.0 Cs�V� a xC QD1a Va°.CV V ^9- ^y=L tCy~4 �LjLB9 W.�9C Y dC ^�L6 CZC4T.c �nsu i` p N u L u Ey L9 y2Yqq C10 'C T9 =CL .`xW N -L. �NpT oYCC ^OLE VvC� ^4 frriVL �Cd CE �i v�.yx tCCc 4 ! ^NA 9w .CY C6VN�:O�•.• -- l�.+.0 wCq H q6 ¢i Qi c e 1 N + LOgO CO y Sy CV C$ .c0 C0 °+CIf.Y qL -aa` IT Y 3.5 ra ew Mp6 b q N= Y -^04Y� C -- r Tqp 9 A C O -uYa�y r CYY Ev V L S �y • ppa iiv 'N��a N O - NC M } yY1' S9 {ts b �p ♦Y V aY V 01°.. 9 Y � V O q y Ny Y�QC L 4 �• °Y�°��OJV OY�Y'Uf. Y La.'cN. w A-Z 3 Sa9c C N- i6 LLJ -Z .gg V�.Q t Y 9 L'E •° CmNL NCI u7NNg+a« aN a. b CC -ACCC o NpYp aA C a YuL aYUY ' b`Cpp4AN -4 U�fQIIIN Va u f CY E°y �� •rte' OQDo E�j pp y=m a KCL y 6V OgYC Oaf NOOTp qu N q °oSC i O E E N w l°f c�v� y Y v 0 N �°� L 1 N ^� -° $ +'°' r V 4 Y O N L g N �NYY �. L $NCpw: `.L: C .� Y M C -v va $v� m�N'"'C7 N Y,r 1 w ° 4 V G Y .°o9a Cwa ^ a ." nL rygi� 'e.L Y+°r.° 0 L 6'uNy. Ue� �.1C 0.�,. ( w °eCyM L• Oy.l{ �. r Y '.tT�rN�/ dup�CYY YY MYiCC. p�... �Op,,S Y.w'. Y•S' Y !eC+ ° °OeY4 °°n O' i z K ° Y co' r a J`q`LL�p°2 °=uC •in YG ^V C 71O ATLp�aL+. •F� L L S CN YOf. rVn Y; :912 C ^ r$ N ^ N N ! v^i^ t'y°j S NO hni iCNSY YMC�l! yVy V^ O�3 SA N40 O 4�Y 6 t Y` 4N b y ' r4� _ S -aa` IT Y 3.5 ra ew r y i* Oly �11L 6 S �y • ppa iiv 'N��a N O d C qar M } yY1' S9 N L$ yy �i G4 'Y M. Ca 01°.. 9 Y � V O q y Ny Y�QC L N.4NJ1 V�.Q t Y 9 L'E •° CmNL OC Y fu <N^ O Y u Y �� �dC L + rV _ Y a8 ww •rte' NN. i �� c 1� ¢t r �� p N Y =w -_yy a N i p C q E T{ E Yq•^� u. Tp VN 9 • nt- °.m-r Cd„°,N ,Up T -� -- _a 9LON L� d 6.°. O.j 1 w ° CbL .°o9a Cwa q p qV. Y:-L rygi� 'e.L Y+°r.° p Y p Vi °°n O' i z K ° co' `ue EN�i •F� �q° .L. ue."e ,N. Y; r$ tmL.m i c4 ». FG.v°i CV RO _O�°n .tea. Zr. S, ra. uia Oc. b y ' r4� 9 40 ,s .a2 l gva>iY Lr+ N{V G b% .Ya1L g 4 V ONO :8 ei G � tY d� Vag. .W ou =n �u� iYiIIIi y� boo . Y L X $n T � 1 O C A '72y y O V C .E. ca—. O .-zgOC 4 `VLN C: A ..L LL Y YIV. Pf'� ��aWjj V�n_ Y t 1^+ J~ 1ppE CY6 tQQOi Y,H yMN G Q° GOCj �'• V L N r'•N G V^ �• n. V _ u+ y y~•• u i a i 4 C 'Eli rT ` • p.+ Y N'YL YYYNS � ■GO ��Oii V sN^ *FOy a& I .q. N �` 6L V �� YECTC Lqpp �LYY "yGY OwT � bI�Cy Y Y �.✓iq. p Y LL -Tsi N V yyyy�j C.G 46V Y nY! Y��m Y ">.CY YC�L "YG G wO A' ggC�V � >'Y g�Nj �p 4' Y yO ,�i:^ rL-'nav° y r¢ny 3EaA IL a � Cac;E i�RUM \ Z wU+ l s p 00 = �Tt . Hd 39Y . vj�„� GLI:.g C Y dLO. �yGl vq °4L v j $a°fib L; R.- XE A F '� N C >q e ►. � q y q Le O Y q' pV•� L� Y � ^. C .n 0'r4 VOC o� �'� O EdY CC V n CyV LY �� C p O6 C °Vy n as�i O nb. CT • ! L A Lpsg OOwN �ti�i W L C V p 4 p YON ■Y a` � ZT y b L y 4 _d 6 y` � i. N •. ° ��1 �Y.^ 6 D �� yL-6 V EG =� L' � i CC 0 Y�'°myi Or oqV "`du q bq3 E6 "_iL w; OMU L V g -E O! O �C�Y LL N G Y ^O� N u r� C V NS c J��. •`: C� 60 Y!I g �tygi ^_ OL "�11 �aL VCC VT t.0 EV' � .�0� Ciy� 3'00 IL .G t ��NW 4 4 V✓q O�� L „ -p 4L Lw f Y Qa N1� C'Y 4^ G�1y yC4V A Y r N N � 2 1.5 L E+ C as L bT� Y A� S w C 6� O J N Y N (Ea�Lpp U W LL O¢a t W Y 2 L090^ • Y. ,s So 58 € X's h p" key 8 Y N yq�y�L j9 Lam— o it v" wt N�c' �3.^L '�iVV �CC � Y y. ai �O aILuEu=y"t O L✓i. pi C3 YwC ttw v�r -��. L� ���yy `u V �YM �'. ��.i fuT�yy � i Lp ti =CwCNC6 G VV Y' • �•C.� n A ^. 1+, CE L.0 pl .: w 'O al ,.GiN. ONM �y ^(pppp�p y'+vy °. Z.1 yuYo YNS aIyyEe -3ia ~O YYf� WH C 4 8 S 8O La L 9 . w L 7Oii G +�N Y Y oC 6w• j�� Gw. a aP °AAyG f �G° 'VIE a Y Cal C 01.9y O 0.�M cpp yN L19 i >N yyO CLwun nL G O.° OC C =y �MYL OZ d 6:tiy Y° +aM is 31 Ly� LL Y Y � Y °�+ b� p V Y �C Cw L Q4ti" Q�P 11 i,1� �ac ^z� +� 7A� �� �.•. pL^ .r@ tp41 rrl 0��. a Y`�.Y pr z. CyC4.� �N.bas re Yp +Gcyc ai od�i SY LC� N p`i� C« �n ^+• �'- o cow �i €€aiG [n a... :° ..� "$o� 2�3�L'.. is v °oNVv YP- N°py (q�N s �y f� • Y �999V ��s .GMiG �1�.� -L YJN9 WYC �G ti�62 SY dam ryL, lN� Few 6 �yI A y 11 �-i 11 osW 9q2. .wq •�q Li r n .eq b 6- b'i Ewa S, Eu 4a a v�q Ya a c tz oM voO W M� 4 Y °Val €„ n W 1,,.- 1. o Y C Qfu:q "' ✓��' It " ep vwi..uZ Nw�. Nd- o• r .L' $i°p'�i..... u v Y O 9u -L q pi ° IS e .W L w �•jTy � gW . _ T •'o q y 1-2 Cq°Y1.Y. G°: YUM4 -Y c o v ti d ls- pNy N M SwN LLI f ywG wupx 7r g «. uNG� l�.�M •6W °M�e6 4p1,yy"� d. r� V v gYNC V.� w0� �- wiiN =is Lw MU w QC D E I a tTf �� ii L '�= �c ^Y ° Y�i of y..$�� e ^.a r Y. 1"I D e �, l� r V =• �...` C Ly Y Ai^ Y it.� C mil^ a�i N y r � Y N O M N 9 6 Y ¢ U q W W Sqp VO ce ° C' �` C � 1 �� � � `r` \ \•y� NIf S osW 9q2. .wq •�q Li r n .eq b 6- b'i Ewa S, Eu 4a a v�q Ya a c tz oM voO W M� 4 Y °Val €„ n u O y Qfu:q "' ✓��' It q� p ��� a� u _ ahQ iYyyGC MqC= 9u -L q pi ° 1 e .W L w �•jTy � gW . _ T •'o q y y C G°: YUM4 -Y ti d ls- pNy N M SwN �4 *T ywG wupx .w L- °p uNG� l�.�M •6W °M�e6 4p1,yy"� 4h� Liu. r� V v W aY Lw f• a I a r Y. osW 9q2. .wq •�q Li r n .eq b 6- b'i Ewa S, Eu 4a a v�q Ya a c tz oM voO W M� 4 Y °Val €„ O Qfu:q "' ✓��' It q� p ��� a� u _ ahQ iYyyGC MqC= 9u -L q pi ° 1 e .W L w �•jTy � gW . _ T •'o q y y C G°: YUM4 -Y ti d ls- pNy N M SwN �4 *T ywG wupx .w L- °p uNG� l�.�M •6W °M�e6 4p1,yy"� 4h� Liu. r� V W �O N LL I a osW 9q2. .wq •�q Li r n .eq b 6- b'i Ewa S, Eu 4a a v�q Ya a c tz oM voO W M� 4 Y °Val €„ Qfu:q "' ✓��' It q� p ��� u iY% �Crq ahQ iYyyGC MqC= 9u -L q pi ° � 1.2 `4'9� Cp� qy u L w �•jTy � gW . _ T rv. pq q y y C G°: YUM4 -Y �a ls- pNy N M SwN ywG wupx .w L- °p uNG� l�.�M •6W °M�e6 4p1,yy"� 4h� Liu. NNNE �O N LL { N { sL O r a� 'C 1 V N . ac w £' uq`o uj FL E8 o a >_ �3 $ Qo V� 2c: V�Y I b 1 { N +ovs r3 y ■ pp�,, i; vpp. e. $ Qo 2c: d � �,1 Y '.' G • i 4' % Sig- V ¢` Bf y •i N� I C�Gy �iyy. p C��i _« yY �y ��� AL...iu "� ���., •+ o m. �rq �� was tt V° S° v -9-f n s.i ua' V a «y of icop ;moon �—+� CL A .: � L '.W iE y � Y v c c d 1 { N +ovs r3 y ■ pp�,, i; vpp. e. w p�V 2c: d � �,1 Y '.' G • i % a N� I C�Gy AL...iu "� E jvw o m. �rq CITY �)F Il NCFlr 4 CUCAMONGA cLCn ttp STAFF I?EP'0RT 2 t n 1477 DATE :: May 27, 19 Td Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission. FROM: Brad Sul,er, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook(Associate manner SUBJECT; ENVIkONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 1327; LEWIS HOME --A tats development resi enti�suis.Ttvision of acres within the Terra Vista Planrk'7 Community (Mediwn -High Residential, 74 -24 dwelling units per acre) into 1 lot for condominium purposes for 256 ,.;dwelling units, loca"d of the southeast corner cf Milliken Avenue and MountaiYi View Drive - APN: zt�f -51 -13 I. PROJECT AND S TE DEjrRIPTION, A. Action;,ge ue -tea: The approval of the subdivision map, conce_ a p�o ; 'plan, ,conceptual grading plap, mceptual landscape plan, and hu"Tding elevations for the �,ve} %apment of 256 multi. - family units issuence of Negative Deelarat on. B. Project density: 13.6 dwelling units'par acre C. Surrounding Land Use and Zvnin Na :`th - Vacant, planned as com ination of attached and detached single family homes; Law- Medium Residentia4' - (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) within the Te,ira Vista Planned Community. South - Vacant, planned for commercial recreation facility, I family apartments and park site; Recreational; Commercial, Medium-High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre), and park site all within the Terra Vista Planned Community. East - Vacant, planned as combination of attached and detached single family homes,, tow - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acrr) within the Terra Vista Planned Community. West Vacakit, planned as combination of attached and detached tingle family homes; Lori- Medium Residential (4 -8 ewell',ng units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Community, I4EM H11 r` J PLANNYNG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT V273 - Lewis Homes s F May G7, 198Y k Page 2 D. General, `Des_1gna��^°, .. Project Site - ,1ig�u KesioMntial (24-30 dwelling units per acre) . North - High Residential (24 -30 dwelling units`pqr aer9)._ South - High Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per`acr!Q. k^ East - Medium Restldentiar (8 -14 dwelling unit per acre). West High'residential - (24 -30 dwelling units per acre); ' Office. E. Site Characteristics: ,- "The .site is bordered. to the north by Mountain , .ei Drive,, to the scuih by t %te major `Greenvay Traf% to the east by vacant land planned -for, future 'Medium Residential development, and to the west by Milliken Avenue. The site slopes from north to sot!th at approximately a 3 -4% ,j grade. No structures or significant vegetation curren:iy exists on the project cite. F. Parking Calculations: Total Units: 255 ' Unit Mix: 1 bedroom - 72 ` 2 bedroom - 184 Par -kY.,g required: 1,5 x 72 = 108 1.8 x 184 = 331 0.25 x 255 = 54 Total = 503 spaces Parking provided: Covered: - 256 Open Standard - 244 Open Compact - 5 - Total = 505 spaces II. APALMS• A General: The site plan is arranged with the bui jings c u�l stered together in a single, large open space mass surrounded by an exterior loop road. Amenities include a recreation building, a pool, 5 spas, a sport court, and a tot lot A large central open space corridor traverses the site in a north to south direction that permits an uninterrupted vista from Mountain View Drive at the tract's northern perimeter through the site to the major Gr ^enway Trail at the prgject',s southern perimeter. Pedestrian connections are provided at the tract's southerly perimeter to enhance the project's orientation with both the major Greenway Trail and the future PLANNING COMMISSIOW STAFF REPORT TT 13273 - Lewis Homes May 27, 1987 Page 3 ` park site to be located south and east of the "project site. The housin4� program is designed as an apartment style, multi- family dev lopment. Buildings are all two -story 8- plexes with four unitsilabave and four units below. Access to upper levels ' is provided through open, anterior stairwells with common landings. JI Three floor plans are provided,, i.e. one 1- bedroom unit and o 2- bedroom units (one with dual master bedrooms). Each floors Ian is provided with its own enclosed patio /balcony space. 0overed .parking is provided with enclosed garages., Architecture can be described as Spanish/ gang Mediterranean in style employing use of stucco siding, "S" style tide roofing, and heavy, enriched detailing of building walls. B. Design Review Committee: In their report to the Design Review Committee, sta . p. resented concerns of inconsistency with the design intent of the Terra :Vi!ta .Commun.ity Plan in terms of site plan design, 3s follows: (, 1. The spatial organization of 1the site plan did nSt permit an adequate flow of open space: 2. The project :perimeter treatments at Mountain View Drive, Milliken Avenue ar,J the Greenway Trail did not offer the quality of street scene desired. 3. The site plan did not orient the project to the Greenway Trail system located adjacent to the tract's southern perimeter. This project was initially reviewed at the Design Review Committee meeting of Dece0er e, 1986 (Barker, Tolstoy; Buller). The Committee recommended _ approval of the Architectural esign an directed that vision be made to the site plan. A revised site plan was submitted for Des•i`gn Review Committee meeting on January 8, 1987 (Barker, Tolstoy, Coleman). The site plan had been revised as follows. 1. The central open space corridor was redesigned to permit vistas from Mountain 'View all the way through the project to the central Greenway Trail. 2. Buildings west of the central open space corridor were reoriented to permit vistas through to the central open space from adjacent building locations. PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13273 - Lewis Homes May 27, 1987 Page 4 3. The Open space system was redesigned such that the visual and physical connection of all building locations to the central open space location was enhanced. A larger and mere pronounced -connection was provided between the private open space.and the central Greenway Trail to enhance their physical connection. 4. Garages located on street frontages were staggered and offse *: to enhance the visual quality of the street scene. ,'he fire lane was redesigned to reflect a formal promenade. While a number of revisions were incorporated is onhance the overall quality of the site design, the Committee felt there were still some 4oncarns unresoly -'d and directed that - urther re isions be made as fo?lows. 1. The project's orientation tc, the Greenway Trail should bc� further enhanced. 2. The design along the project's east perimeter should include some element to interrupt site iinas down the drive aisle to prevent straight, uninterrupted view of pavement through the project site. 3. Rear elevations of garages visible from public rights - of -way should be accentuated with additional architectural embellishments to enhance their appearance. The second revised site plan was submitted for .Design Review Committee review on May 7, 1987 (Emerick, Buller). The - Cottmittee felt chat with the revised plan all outstanding issues had been.adequatuly addressed and recommended approval Of the project subject to the following: 1. The two most westerly of the three gar_ges located cast of the central open space and on the south side o:0 the drive aisle adjacent to the Greenway at the project's southern perimeter shall be iocatid approximately 90- 100' to 'the nest to align with the garage units on the north side of the drive aisle. The third garage shall be relocGted to the southerly end on the west side of the drive aisle at the tract's easte °r. perimeter. (See Exhibit "G") 11 H� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13273 Lewis Homes May 27, 1987 Page 5 r 2. The building at the project's southeastern corner should L',,,relocated to the ;wast as close to the adjacent building as possible t,r;:s)nhance open spare vistas to the trail and park. (See Exhibit "G") c 3. An enhanced garage elevation fo4, the back elevations of garages that face Mountain View, Milliken, and the k Greenway Tr&il are to be provided. The actual design detail is to be submitted for the review and approval of !4 staff prior to issuance of building permits. (See f, Exhibit "!i -4'' ) 4. The central open space corridor is to be planted as a formal promenade with trees plantsd on both sides of the walkway along fs entire length. (See Exhibit °G") All of these items: have either been incorporated into revised plans, or included as Conditions of Approval ,n the attached resolution. C. Technical Review Committee Tie Technical Review Committee - rev ewe the p'.�oject an e—terminec'i that, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with al's applicable standards and ordinances. D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the product and determin�e� tha;., with the recommended Conditions of Approval„ the 'project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been camp ete y t e applicant. Staff has completed Part 11 a the Environmental Checklist and -found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. An acoustic study has been p- epared in c mformance with the requirements of the General Plana The incorporation of ?-11 necessary mitigation measures into the project design have been included as Cond•*,'ions of Approval. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for this project to be approved, the P a„Iing ommiss -on must find this project to be co:nsi'.itent with the Terra Vista !'fanned Community and the General Plan, that this project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties, or cause significant adverse impacts. It must also he determined that the proposed use, building designs, and subdivision, together with all recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with all applicable regulations in the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan. PLANNING COMMISSZ` 4 STAFF REPORT i »; TT 13273 - Lewis Homes May 27, 1987 • Page 6 IV. CORRESPONDENCE: ;this, item has been advertised as a- public hearing c x TF—Thei aijy Report newspaper, the property pasted, and notices. were sent to a property owners within 300 Meet of product" site. V. RECOMMENDATION: " Staff fecwnends that the Planning Commission approve entat ve Tract 13213 subject to the Conditions of Approval through adoption of the atV�ched Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. ` Resop Wully submitted, )Brad 1v City/Planner ` BB:BC:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Terra Vista Master Plan t ExhiWt "B" - Site utilization Exh','bit 10C" - Area Cevelopment,t'laes_ Exhibit "D" - Subdivision Map �. Exhibit "E" - S `e Plan ' Exhibit "'F" - Concept,:ai�Grading Plar. Exhibit 'IG" - Conceptual Landsrapei an w Exhibit: "H" - Street Imorovement5 . Exhibit-'"I" - Building Elevations Exhibit "J" - Floor, Plans R9solutylon of.Approval with Conditions Y .j i i n nfi d � trj UN �ESe. ��ls. ��St. !ililii•W��11• Ail = ,�; `'•3 _ :fie! r., �F _ - anwaar w � • tszxwa ffitn L r i i. R�N�. "Aw fpiS ri gQ •3i ��it 11MM �f _ -'S:.agP.r....� IIiiCC • � w w ����� f e1 C. ' ,7^•'`n v a.m. -.�' i .. S� �, .,� p�� s�;t S3 s a fill 0' w % X14 ld A c t R im ps h + i- ` X a i �" $L 3 ��'. �.* s •3.. gQ s -as= ^ladtt-°.� o v.. a.. . � '.t 1, ,f {:5 •. �' a.a 1 < '4E t 3 a Alt[ f- ` � i4.� ••� -.-+ p�r`er� jf1 1 �s � } f\ Yjr Q1 *'S't"4 i 1 itlg7. s t '�. ;6th _�g.� J •_ _�� � Y4ti'�•�+` .:Seal' LL11_.3`- r•wa. � ! 4 ]IWYAV wiAYX b � a ]ntllflb M1wrN 0 J� F -� i - `l •d � i V 1X•'q P7 -17 t mm' I eg a 44l. iz 7f IBM, lznvao f v K � � �� riSrA vYa3i m.-1YMltbti�d0Y1W �r� ~ i S O �wg ;s Z: LY a y it E� I It f v K g � � �� riSrA vYa3i m.-1YMltbti�d0Y1W �r� ~ i g � � S <P %d %tttlq s p�p t r J r � l V tz- UaN h it y. ���0�• a1S+.M ++Irn+r 4�.�iKi OMrtN � �. .. � �.ki► °- '+ iS q: is ii Y ' ;k a ,. !� � :� �: y._ Jo eq ri�x !t xiEt 1a't: r. i �e _ iitis ski ikk+� i �y g �i tiij ixria e t ( _ 7. 5 Er � i ',fir .. - + A ti _—±� )_ - •�, .s�r. a' A h i - ♦r.l iTk 10 .• � � � 13 ............. -r- Fa -- ----- J6. 79 F-- 0 Q r 2RxIxv 79 F-- 0 Q r r ! ratan rsnt I saxtt+�rtt w rte, H c ' yyyy t' SZ - v � r ! 3nr t .... _�.. +.�� Fes• .i"�� � .. 1 r J � ratan rsnt I saxtt+�rtt 3nr t .... _�.. +.�� Fes• .i"�� � .. 1 r J � 1 If LIIL Tr IF 96 1 If LIIL Tr TERM VISTA PLM NED COM MITY PROJECT AND STREET STATUS NN ti Soo 1�000�15w k ° ) SVWe !n wet �� 60t 4 �c p_a PROJECT NO, TT IJ 7,3 Preiim i unary - ~- Completeness S TRC ,PC Reccrded Fffialed "MuAWAL �N IN M P uw W LM I LIN i u4¢• LM '$. p Lip �r ioc ` L �• f� per` MAC LEGEND: - PROJECT STATUS In Process rK7'q P C Approved C� Recorded ® Finaled CITY OF STREET STATUS RANCHO CUCAN10NO,rc1 M � est d , n Pavement � Required for this Proj PLANNI \G DIN!ISK)IN L Afh en - pull zitZt i ier e r 1 s Fail! wlw�h ON Apis! ITE;NI= EXHIBIT- i` a SCA' E of-IV — 11 k" r x i iEx=f:. ..wM - . VINvo:,nv0 A0 - VDMOt7VtMO ONONVY VJStA Vukay vxel0lilY7 R "SZI�VUOT ^_ i ' - iliCt LOWS UnNOOMO9 N 3A4003 %3 V "aW IWUVAM3 4 O < y . w i ~V, . . .. ... y Tr�l O 4 i e er y IL r° Uj ul , s; ! e i C—P 11 k" r x i iEx=f:. VINNO417YO 40 S3WOM SIM31 0 at Kf 7 W 134 'yy o Z H Nt 4, •._ rONONtiDm CNONrtl V1SIA Y1W31 ttstl SOYICi YYNW{'77S i6Yi1➢:SOYAMOCNOO 7' _ '� . . 0 uurlouv 4'JOU P;kOU sy� t ; YINNOlIIV'J j0 53WON SIMr3t- f, N�t F W o A u. 3 !� r N• Mat LU l !Y ♦9NOR1'JIi7 ON,11YY rain rYYn N 7Aa Ixml �'NSNO 774OWWIGNOO s := {:t =_y LU N�t F W o A u. 3 !� r N• Mat LU l !Y It s := {:t =_y LU �. - •Yj:li lor It s := {:t =_y fYj3i �. - •Yj:li lor ` F . Z I U y�y 1Ri• .f 3 x n i It s := {:t =_y fYj3i �. - •Yj:li � � Z It s f I F cY-.3 Q � � Z I U J G S ! WI J i 21 14� 2 p1{ 'Ya'YONOm7fl�07rJMrY VIMA A E XWW VILU) vovm I 3ALMS" V 7 - 0-4k '"k CO AF-If IS N�. �m r.v�.r'� ""t°'�'�.i'—A iT -.� sx3u�401aaWnaaa _ —VOOH wp x 11W it it it I I I LL Sim - is _ _ •y_:i .� t' F�;1�T )fi (�.✓1 •--- '. —�-cl j' er� j , f � f t . � •.. ti � i 'k S �.�. V� j1 xx f tit y I LL Sim r.— ...� • xS3 � � '- ^�. •.t ctiu off laulu � ' ��i�.. xi' u." • V,. smxwwoaxa: n i +�an�a - f +, ti •3 i.�Sr'tc i. - �� :.�,y $ � (• # c : to 1 n T i T Tit 99 yy �„ _04 - Fa �• i. s - �R i : .y �. � 1 ��1 j • • F k yl 9 TIi9EyF �ti 7�j 9 F . IF ----•F � ~ l 1 it- •t,-- �..� -1• mss_ . �; —. Ttf9t ;ar MIN n ON Wtl1 - � i W Yui. w • �i i t kI . lid 'jiF U z rt Ti #- Air t ` s 1 RESOLUTION NO. 'i A REST UTION OF THE PLANNING `Cv4MIS5Ia1 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO JCUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, "CONrTTIONALLY APPROVING TENTAIlVE TRAGr MAP NO. 13273 AND DESIGN REVIEW t4EREOF - APN : 227- 151 -13 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13273, hereinafter "Map" subritted by Lewis Hanes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 15.8 acres in the Medium Residential District (4-14 dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Community located on the southeast corner of Milliken. Avenue and Mountain View Drive into 1 lot for condominium purposes, regillarly came before the Planning Commission for public C.zaring and action on May 27, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and 'r WHEREAS, the Planning Commmission has read ano considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has consic-7i*d::other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION T: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 13273 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific Plans; (b) The design or.improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitabl; for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract, is not likely j- cause serious public health problems; (f) Tta' design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by -� h public at large, new of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. I i II PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N1. TT 13273 - Lewis Homes May 27, 1987 Page 2 (g) Twat this project will not create adverse impicts on the environment and a Negative Declar&iion is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 13273 and Design Review thereof, a copy o w is is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division 1. Decorative, texturized pavement shall be provided at all driveway entrances and pedestrian crossings across driveways. Final details and locations shall be included on the landscape and irrigation plans, subject to review and approval by the Planning Division, 2. All trash enclosures shall be provided with overhead lattice work or similar shaded structure to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Final details of the garages shall be included in construction drawings for review and approval by the Planning Division. An enhanced garage elevation for `the back elevations for garages that face Mountain View, Milliken, and the Greenway Trail are to be provided.. The actual design detail is to be submitted for review and approval of the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Ali retaining walls s »all be instructed a,' de.:orative block, subject to review and approval by the Planning Division. 5. Final design details of the perimeter wa<7 located at the east tract perimeter shall be included as part of the landscape/ irrigation plans, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division. 6. Low level lighting shall be provided in all open space areas ane along the Creenway Trail, Design details shall be included on the detail lighting plan subject to review and approval of both the Planning Division and the Sheriff's Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. All outdoor ;nail box locations shall be provided t►i'th a solid overhead structure and ap;iropriate lighting. The final design; of any free standing structure shall be compatible with the building architecture and shall be included in the construction, drawings, subject to the review and arMroval of the Planning Division. 8. An enclosed tot lot with active play equipment shall be provided= Location and design details shall be included in the landscape /irrigation plans, subject to the review and approval of the Planning division. PLANNING WMMISSION RE$rLUTION NO. TT 13273 - Lewis Homer' May 27, 1987 Pag 3 9. The primary source of heating for the pool shall be solar energ.m. Design details shall be included in the construction drawings, subject to the review and appr(tal of the Planning Division. 10. Construction details of the recreation building and /or ail shade structures shall be included in the construction drawings, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division. 11. The Greenway Trail adjacent to the project's south perimeter shall be developed as a part of this project. Complete improvement details for the Greenway Trail shall Me included in the landscape /irrigation plans, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division. 12. The site plan shall be revised as follows: a. The °•,two most westerly of the three garages located east of the- project's central open ' pace spine and on the south side of the drive aisle adjacent to the Greenway at the project's southern perimeter shall be relocated approximately 90 -100' to the west to align with the garage units on the north side of the drive aisle. The third garage shall be relocated to the southerly end on the west,r'de of the drive aisle at the tract's eastern perimeter, b. The building at the project's southeastern corner shall be relocated to the west as close to the adjacent building as possible to enhance open space vistas to the trail and park. 13. The central open space corridor is to be planted as a.formal promenade with }sees planted on both sides of the walkway along its entire length. Final details shall be included on the lane,scape /irrigation plans, subject to review and approval of the Planning Division. 14. Conformance to all mitigation measures as contained wiOd n the approved acoustic study shall be achieved to the satisfaction of the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 15. A revised grading plan shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Grading Committee prior to the issuance of grading permits. Engineering Division 1. Milliken Avenue shalt be constructed full width incluftt.g the landscape median from Foothill. Boulevard to Base Line Road. Sidewalk, street lights, and parkway landscaping beSond the project boundary may be deferred until development of the adjacent property. 41 PLAhRING.COMMIS=N RESOLUTION NO, TT Lewis 'Homes May 27, 1987 P3yi 4 Mountain `thew Drive shall be constructed full width io include ,. „ curb,; and gutter on the north side from Milliken Avenue to the east projectWP oundary. Parkway improvements-` along the north side may be- °x„2ferred until the development` "of the adjacent property. 3. Construct the portions of Master Nan Storm Crain Lines #1 and #5 from Beer Creek Channel to the site, and c* ?nstruct Park Basin #1, or provide an alternate drainage disposal" system as approved by the City Engineer. 4. Appropriati easements for streets and storm drains:- shall be provided as required by the City Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ` - McNie ,Chairman ATTEST: _ra u ry er, eputy ecre a I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introdur2d, passed, and adopted by the Planning 'cmmission -of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • its x r 0 � N r � x r 12 p D v N � O ° u« Y+°s O C Nis =a g°�� �$a tiv L r C ^a V 4 a tl q c` —S� qv �roa °5�, �sJ aLpp .•-� G.as O ° 4 i �` Q s a° ;a te r >o~ °l =maoa 5.).$ m.��i1 °� Ya•4 t tits. OIL <p C ` CYr�� Sy SC-p42y Y N pl.._ A y 8 r, Nyp D•� e �tl s �tlN� tl CL `.OvZ�O�Oy,L<yCZy� �rN ppwY+ Q�V�Yy +w; u..Q},.. 4 NY °y 2°6 VIQ 4gpp�VO VM ja QI�H'y ryy �f YN ^w9W y�Yy q $s ptl t °C•6 s °. IL ; .. g 1 . . ROa i$�awt� � 9"at Ij 3 °rSe Muw°tl $� �g ~'°Yk was igra d Vqq` ...p► si R3� V� N'3 °g •qVr.� VrM °Y \I W x r 0 � N r � x r 12 p D v N � O 1�1 C3.�tq O NO y C ^a V }O �sJ aLpp .•-� G.as O ° •- rd f°. �` Q s �d 8$•'•Er'=•No ML Sy a, L ..). �tl s �tlN� tl 19 f t 1�1 141 13 LUZ v :6 Q. �C n qI C C1OCL• .OUP �`y q. dO aa'u �EyMG �y dU � O 6.. �d UCW Ctd G a0. 0.'r ENSN L�JGC6 y o0.t O y t FiC NUJ NL A9YyU� 4,Up Uq _AN .,• U Gam° O.Y.. i3.i: Cuv. l;tiQ C pOL =. �.gi.�L� � q�'•� �qq ` � j� UFO �E -'� ..6 i't/ �N6 pC.q O�iNyU jn L N.td4m �� N =_ C `. UL 'y.F L —VwN Nwd A Cy..A C Y Q'.R a° VL y `SV t • ,�C O� N �Ca Z 9G9_M Nq A• <. w. 0 i .� � - U.c ,o'G +v+E• L'sUn� � d� L �Lp� �p .pfi ° vG App6C U �. fy�v W L U�."'.Ly lj � AM.NC ��y yyyY y4.G'O ice. ptL et C �OA r.. CC E _ t C A •" � O V Qt C � S.� W Y y 3' � M b rte. q n M u pev, v °`�...uq',., Y^ s °Q� +a '' +�,q°,1. g��■Cy o c pwa pb r. ��ySa�a+pi ca��r =•.. SV.o'�pp� �'! $r °G. i nG n VCS m � �opa✓S1� L n G a+AC qp °� pOVN m$ Ofa L =p <C+ <Ae�a sN °uu` mN�a'fi..GO.3 �.�tgEo cry WG ^s eIg c ►A.°. n� 'TOW -V ZC :_., A O O N�3 c S. nr �dND .G�• • '7 q�O Q. ..r y�YN `• U dp �C''O ig` s -g1 ra -o Ng N�N N s o .e ate• $ .N.+ ~' c q�CC Y� qY gouN�� U= v,yp L� CCR�M• Y, z$ „Y. �IV�• ��G Y�•; Vr CA�ip Cgi4 aqC �i P�cC n•�a +��� gH aN Gu V�, Ny Qy u.` do c� Vy� T uo,n"u EOL °,, o."mY'� ooL• qr�..! Ao +. •n � u +!U Gu N GpY.p< J � L C Uyn GOON a °�L.N n u�AN o�Vo T9 G+ •V..� i c. N C.UL Ga S psi , Z N Y e o ° 6�_ &qe���+ yq�sy o a c� Cpl `oN gyp. p. O + 'Oy C NL Y AA CyC n•JUN a° on. ci •c.c i Amk �sd aaq� ruse �c L S o•��c F.. rOG4 ass 4•N6 C ."� °. r _ a NL c¢iS •av � Ru N+ .$ ztlq ^aY O. qY ♦. rL�tl +^ yaa Qq. Gy N tl tl py Qgg �4 � .LTGC 1 NY y.. A 4uy �L N n ?9ua • 4� '" G V L�.^ cc„ m n. c�c � caa G,..c n w� ✓y qC 8 rr q2 �Y U urC ^. ?+ m qvy � p•Qe Q,s� vv.�K Nep ,,,i 6 KL ! D 4 T +m 64 u�i fu 6N t .C4 C » 4 M rn� cg —LT. dt ae cNi �°ea�`ec c $ � i °m n v -•e OM �e Ytfg9�G kq E 9 N� r9 EL `q__ jggiL�yG w ffi v �w N y L u a v dO q4p� J = ?N °4fl ra = �t�•s• L��cn�v ar Y Oa•c .• (.p �N cTcM�{� a C4 r G6d9aL l0 U � NI t W M Od G I. .t�y Nn QVO�MY NJ� �� 2-2 to GGRGdd qC6 C i3' L GE O � L Na Y W Qz n r_a d ti....•"G. c _ ^ N ' mil•• dY O eq 4� °00 OLOV A yCGr G ^I @tll'al�{7ttly}} V d at v O p `+- Z U E`~ g6�1` O ^ G• "N d N Y pp, C O 6 O Y N O O Qa�•¢ q ° d. q .°. fr1 W cam.. G C,N O " �C d G q O,Ka _GO e ^ O y� va d L Ca p ... ' 7 O R Y ^pU..4°. j L L '"Yn p - p1C ^ y 6 b N4 6" ^O Ct 6 O T^ a q N.MO OL q: SL MNtl 'LY•T4C O T M DTI, �r!a ""� G ? Cq pN.aL Cr4 dO•qp ^.G �r p•� vi d a N0 a.G ^.� C. CC.tl VwM C O 4.r L .'• "'.. r y w ` a p66 0 8:� L W .. 4° +• QQ O y Y O l O' N 7 It d opp y L� CO 4NYay �N Lp.0 OC •e r�A'N Gy4 ^ Zee �L �Oy N CN�T qV LU .j �^ .N Im Q�1^ � Lnapn u�A e %�.. T dd y W6c��tLVaOYR.Y�YCG1 ci� G N6LnaGw �tlp O ^��v �t NNg� NN qa =ffi at. 6�4,� a q g; qY r W . ° ^g O v q p a y. Cyp p q Y J •U. L rn L L �•.. 6f4'� YUp.0 L.O G4aC.�C1 G y} NG�� T'i4pp� nk.. Yr .n p G q® G Or L OL ~` yC Ya E,�q rN� tl g.YD tlyGy� 4 � �N: .7N ^ C FIOL OSLY _L.Y.�1 vy r.� OOtl LL �sd aaq� ruse �c L S o•��c F.. rOG4 ass 4•N6 C ."� °. r _ a NL c¢iS •av � Ru N+ .$ ztlq ^aY O. qY ♦. rL�tl +^ yaa Qq. Gy N tl tl py Qgg �4 � .LTGC 1 NY y.. A 4uy �L N n ?9ua • 4� '" G V L�.^ cc„ m n. c�c � caa G,..c n w� ✓y qC 8 rr q2 �Y U urC ^. ?+ m qvy � p•Qe Q,s� vv.�K Nep ,,,i 6 KL ! D 4 T +m 64 u�i fu 6N t .C4 C » 4 M rn� cg —LT. dt ae cNi �°ea�`ec c $ � i °m n v -•e OM �e Ytfg9�G kq E 9 N� r9 EL `q__ jggiL�yG w ffi v �w N y L u a v dO q4p� J = ?N °4fl ra = �t�•s• L��cn�v ar Y Oa•c .• (.p �N cTcM�{� a C4 r G6d9aL l0 U � NI t W M O Ll 1:1 �2d - so , \v M Ot CU 9�� 4 F v. sggy Ug� 3a •L..� �u� L�L B q N. YV LO Y E'.4' r E `+ W ooa ve,e o� su' -Ell g ct: G. �' L CEO 6 ayw O Cr^ uq+go RL= oa O L OD CM �C'�' 4 �. `yr 6� ^T C Q/f •� O.Y S lOi �7L NWY 4 L pa i' Nrim�� G� Q,CitO YN�. y VC a Girds Quay Y V` Cy a �Yi SLY W o Ny> aLCyii�� • mQ S„ " o, =c �ga 9 O Ll 1:1 �2d - Ot CU 9�� 4 Yd 22 LQUU `YLQY ZtT° O > u§ ■ Y E'.4' r E `+ p� � �Y.CV� 'yaYOy 6 y01 3 O O p 3Lu�a pa i' Nrim�� "�4uC u VC a O Ll 1:1 =agm FLU VC a aLCyii�� • mQ S„ " o, =c �ga ue � NY $ .Y.TY E Et_ d d', 5 — =a d v' $c .■K■s4 c L u 4 3 C G N Y to ^ M.L .a C GC , " N • C N LuY „�^ �.L r.d6 N O ar N i P O. S E 6 y 'Y f U d Y L C Yy■ Q° O N. ^ L 6'e N u O q L ^ y Q �`e aN 4`v c �. e`yna. N vrd Q..- °�`n f•C "�C� t0� �a mm AN.��. CC pip U.S. V P9 Q. ,^�d r Va�.wC OWC N40 s of -... &„o,° ria. c cd�ct�� �+Ep �o^• �` u,p"..;=�.i Is O A a W. p -= O° <a76 i� NR.N oc°r. N�� 0Al ugets P � Ld Or• td i L O O Ll 1:1 {tWn 1 ' O Z 0.' 0. E tQY^ 3N0 C O ` �E9 C yS y O O,pC °y �MY Z!y'IZ OYw. YSE Q ♦.• � v d q' � y NV.� 515 L M a ?y LyL N.M ( VG fa�aC O O ~ QC�C � ~ q q9 ^ ^ L rata. i'�CCdL (�S•G V AL r3 n. � ` J L geNy Y> W2CV C` .rCa 01L M' � LY 4 6W.r u i V y V .L°rp P. u °' ■p a�3 o,yY YP`" U .i �% ".]>'��'O Zc b G s V i u. N ■ W C CC4 U 4 V O. L l O a i x V OIN NLOa V ..� y��YYY �( ` �! V `.. Y Oq = N ice^ a n� YyOe tUwJ S S S S Oa S .�.p v a'i V'L N ^u4 Y�01 a M Y Ll �° NL qC Vpp = �ViLaV�L 9 1LIDS�V +K �.�40 iT4 O 9 Yy��. y �. � ii ate. LC aY Ly�OY Mw r CC Si.C. yiV �.=i v yu° p,E ? a . a�`yr cy Z X cG1 N .ti N yYa W V a.l V YI �O OH'a' C CQ O O ` `aV V y yS y oG s swu - -- Q QS�IIim 1N Y YSE Q � v y6 o CC � � 2 2 C CL�6i L LyL N.M ( VG fa�aC O O ~ QC�C � ~ q q9 ^ ^ L L t 3'P L (�S•G V _ Y a- N LF {1 C L�eyL� r0 th $ `° W 99�//�a qS a Ne S �v- 'u�L• g y Z. R �w V - CL is C Y ° 'y 6E °a N 9 Y O 4 +CO•qq� °y6. `. L�O .�W g� a^ ��Q &r: V L �� „i°Y.Yy` of y� �� �� _^ a L°o■ S� I' $- AY W{9 YC. uy La� „� � Cw YUY Up�. C ++?i VrL a &LiN 3 °L« � z.NN`4G i6 YO 4.100 a44C�. C V q 4Ye m q O n t .•. 0 s8 �p Ai9 V G N A •. Y�� n 6U &� .. � q .+ • • w V M i— G r 1M a o L a o1 gS t-'uE y�o � Y oY O ac H ^ v K �d 2e� VL HOC g� yL M.N NV•. Np � M ■ ■fir YI NW «.+ eeE 4wT �aF ��CS tl�= ■���i0 -VEguB YN`°• v N • N \I.1I `° pDv u V SSa 0. N G 0 s8 �p Ai9 V G N A •. Y�� n 6U &� .y .a �Eqq J a t-'uE y�o � Y oY I —N—Cn °q.W pw ^ K �d 2e� VL HOC g� �7 E4��L CC ES�DL' p`F5S r��ay Im 7 l s8 �p Ai9 V G N A •. Y�� n 6U &� �Eqq a t-'uE y�o a5��s oY I —N—Cn °q.W pw ^ �d 2e� VL HOC g� E4��L CC ES�DL' p`F5S r��ay yiL 4wT �aF ��CS tl�= ■���i0 -VEguB YN`°• ' `° pDv u V SSa 0. N G - W g I p���ppppy iY � 1k Im 7 l a O &52.d a na O_ a is v uj ,e C Y 0 O °E 0 u i n q Cf,{ °ph. 3 A M yy p4y, US- CZ �' a A Vol a$ r N SY; Li YS^ i A Oa N O�C Y�IL V y C. O pll y yy µu yC NAEM oQMOrC {31y yOY U -Ey N COOL{L¢}- qy� V CM Y�yY/. L AO SZE- •N el O'Cf CU "�O COQ m L ��4 L, C S1 as O� V�yY Ji .may ¢a. oNi� 9Ra9• iy 1N'� «/pq. M Y D.yy. Q A LAY y. C SI 912 p a O &52.d ATTtF ATl Ty AT.TA{'TA 11TTA A lA'A1T/T A �- -- a va- avaaaivaav vvvcae.�vi��s:n. G\i�'iOA STAFF REPORT O Q �_ U i> DATE: May 27, 1987 197 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad. Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT:. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -15 reques o es a 11sh a church witHin a ea—T' ,5edssoeEre.°df 5,040 square feet (Suites 812, 813 and 8141 7lof a new 5 acre industrial 'park that is under constAktion, in the General Industrial District Subarea 4, loOAad at..the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and,. 7th Sta!et = APN 209 - 211 -36 and 47. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit. B. Surrounding Lu�r.i Use and Zoning: 355FM vacant; urea 4 South - Multi- tenant indd "rial, Subarea 4 East Industrial, Subarea 5 West Single family residential, Low (2 -4 du /ac) C. General Plan Designations: Poaec-t—Si e - General Industrial North - Geneiral Industrial South General Industrial East Low°Residential, (2 -4 du /ac) West General Industrial Rail Served 0. Site Characteristics: The site is a multi - tenant industrial par . which is curdy -under construction. At this time there is only one other tenant which has pre - leased space in the industrial park. E. Parking Calculations: No. of ho. of Type of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Use Footage Ratio Required' Provided Cnurch 2,112 1/35 60 60+ ��1 k• r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -15 - CALVARY CHAPEL May 27, ?97 Page 2 II. BACKGROUND: Calv:, -y Baprti,t is currently located and approved for Arc iald, the Archicenter. The church was directed to submit for a modification to their Conditional Ose Permit as the result of a two -year review. The, church then determined that the projected costs to apply for a modification and to comply with the original conditions of approval were prohibitive in that their congregation is increasing in size and would soon outgrow their present location. Therefore, they opted to submit this application for a new larger location. III. ANALYSIS: At this time there are only two other tenants in the project. Cumberland, a manufacturer of plastic bottles and isopropyl alcohol has ieased the building to the south and operates during normal business 'hours Monday through Friday. A drywaii contractor has shown interest in the adjacent Suite 811,. 'the Commission has revi&,,ed this type of use in ind serial centers before and the Train concern has been for parking availability. Calvary Baptist proposes to operate morning and evenings on Sundays and Wer' gsday evenings from approximately 7OO p.m. to 9 :0o p.m. Based on a s!Inctvary size of 2,112 square feet, 60 parking spaces are required, 65 spares are available directly adjacent to the building. Therefore, at this time, if the future tenants have regular business hours, there will not be a .parking conflict as a result of the church. There are approximately 230 spaces available on the entire site.. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is consistent with the General 7S an and the Indus rial Specific Plan. The proposed use together with the recommended conditions of approval will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the area. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has 'been advertised as a public hearing ne f5a3T�ty eport newspaper, property posted, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the: Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit 87 -15 through adoption of attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Resp atfully bmitted, G ller City !M annex El s —;�; C� �7 . PLANN.ING COWISSICN STAFF REPORT CUP 87.16 - CALVARY CHAPEL May 27, 14A7 Page 3 BB °CWisgr I �\ Attachments. Letter of Intent Letter dated May 6, 1987' Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - floor Plans Resolution of Appro.al with Conditions �y AML / L l i ii 0 A `!t1 L' /l f/•.�,! 'G� j— t 2 t`fitt�.L4l'1� � irlpffy/r rffrl'hfi 4ea, dl -,-o Sc .?G/ -.�f 1,�9'�+it�.w �� l�G1ar1�►?�'.ue^r�v�' fi7"' �.`3v ,l�..rr�`, j Xt°' 'G'�7itnC4, /ir'Sf:erl"X 11747,.5 ✓��lG!' %s J�'y�"�.i.�.r/F Y.yt/ �rR✓cr,'r�z,/ /s.���.r�.1W� j iii --. -� Gam" 3 !�% y��,,.t'".e� ✓�iC +"�J 4..�1'G. /'�7%�r= .'E..I j.�'�!�` !'G°". �S ,- rstfG 7' j � \ ! /�5����Sf� � _.f.,�,� G� / � ,�t'•'�OG� .fir !-'� /� �i`i %�,�i".Z�� AlIkk RANCHO PLAT. fy r r f FFY;g Cw AZ;ONGA rare r.itir t '' May 6, 1987 A t_r516 ATT: Plann�rai� Commission This le``1MIr is in reference to qi ,Conditional Use Permit, #�a44W, to acquire a Modifbi a' Lion to a Conditional Lase Permit. Aft r investigating the cost that our Fellow- ship would incur to bring the spites up to codes req.uirementy we have decided not to continue to pursue the Modification to a Conditio 1 Use Permit, To improve these suites would put cur church in a financial burden. ' so we aiv,at present appJiing vor a new condi- tional Use Permit at a new loisition; which will be more beneficial and not as costly to our fellowship. All preliminary discussions with Foothill. Fire District, The Planning Division and Building a42 Safety Departments of the City have been favorable. Thank you for being patient with usb If you J, have any cLuestions, please call me at (71%x) 94$ -$532. i Sinc ely, im Orate w. n 1 Ihr•! mf4c WL 12 $,03AP. �` gAil �.r ,as �, •� ftr.3 S-" AC, 4.$S AQ 3.00 Aa u arar,� erne � A 040 AO-VA _ Zge Ac USAC i I ORTH CITY OF ITENP L) ,� RANCHO CUCA NIONGA TITLE: � T13i�t Mme` PL�.�;'v1 \G T7IL'LSIQ EXHIBIT- - ALE: NO o- -. # �... 91'Z5 Arrhihald 4 #A B G .. -.. 4a ..—. r i F E Q -- 9135AtChiSitd —��, F N ., �� — UNIT SP FT e A B,C D » F -- _ r A_ D 7.69 i. Ijjj���^^� 1 pp� F 1.200 .e :•F � ' i � � l � - iii ' � � _ E . f if�ill31� � V . �.� t ill;fttP �,.�� it _ ter; r i!toj 4. it " 7 # INDUSTRIAL &WITS ii ' C 901 A TYPP- SQ FT }'. r-- - - -- A 802. .4 1.680 t I i C 902 -------- &' 1,360 tE A E03 2,655 Pt 4` I D 2.176 90} A 805 E 1,960 tJ ;D 904 81 806: u Its 1- -- - - ^- -- -+ iD 90S ' > B — 808. _ D 906 B 809J v+ C 907 A SlI t If aC- -90&—OSE7} r CITY OF ITEM: .4_. Vii. —� `_• --1 RANCHO CL I \'Grp. TITLE-. � PLANNING DI%jSjQN EXHPBIT. -.j!j7_ :SOLE• -.-- � ._.,. 1 1 !r � t 2.d CITY OF RANCHO CUCkN,10 \'GA PLANNING DIVISK)IN T-1 TI'T'LE- eLA't.J EXHIBIT--C' SCALD-1-46 RESOLUTION. NO. m A RESOLUTION OF Tk RANCHO CUCAMONrA PLANNING r40MMTSSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BYO 87 -1s r ;CALVARY CHAPEL LOCATED AT 9757 7TH STPEET IN Tkc " GENERAL INDi'3TRIAL DISTRICT APN 709- 211 -36 AND 47. ' 1 WHEREAS, on the 21st day of April, 1987, a complete application 'w, . filed by Calvary Chapel for rev -few of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 27th day of May, IP97, the Rancho Cuca_mpnga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- descriaediroject. NON, THEREfD44. the Rancho Cucamohy.4 Planning Commiss'lon recoive'J as follows: SECTIONI 1: That the following findings can be met: 1, That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. Tha., the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, saf €ty, or welfare, or matieriaily JI injurious to properties or improvements in the vr.; ni +..y. 3. That the proposed use complies with each­ o-, the adplicable provis', s of the Development Code. -ECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -03 is approved subject tote o owing conditions: 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance r with all sections of the Industrial Specific Plan and all other applk,.able City Ordinances. 2. All signs proposed for this Conditional Use Permit shall be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and tine approved Uniform Sign Program for the project and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior_ to installation_ 3. If the ope-vation of this Conditional Use Permit causes adverse eftects to neighboring businesses, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought bafore the Planning Commission for their review and possible termination of the use. or s� € I, Brad Builer, Deputy -Secretary o!',.-the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 277th day of May, 1987, by the rollowing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES:. COMMISSIONERS; ASSENT; COMMISSIONERS: P 'R LOTION NO. CUP 87 -15 CALVARY •Chri,.L May 27, 198 Page 2 4. The buitdtn.g shall not be occupied, until completion of all improvements required 'by Building and Fire Codes to the satisfaction of the wilding and Safety Division and Foothill Fire Protection District.' Prior to occupancy, plans shall be viMitted to the. the Foothill Fire Protection - District and the z Building and{,Safety Division to show compliance. The building I„ail be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 5. The building may be used for religious. assembly and other large group (50+ persons) acti, ities only on Saturdays add Sundays and after 6.00 pm. on weeknights. 6. Preschcls or schools a <;a not allowed by this r. permit; however, -this sh't', not preclude nurseries or Sunday School during' -ihe hours of religious or group assemt9y. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMh1ISSION OF THE CITY OFAANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: k; tarry . , c e , na rman r ATTEST: -3rad Buller, Deputy 5ecretary I, Brad Builer, Deputy -Secretary o!',.-the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 277th day of May, 1987, by the rollowing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES:. COMMISSIONERS; ASSENT; COMMISSIONERS: ITEM J CITY OF RAN CHO CUCAMONGA -'CAAr STAFF REPORT 0 DATE: May 27, 1987 TO: chairman anO Mewbors of the Planning Commission FRM-.� Brad 84ler, City Plariner, By� Scott Murphy, Assistant WFanner SUBJECT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13442 ANY ILLIAM LYON C - A �esi ential tract, subdi-visjoh' of Z9.Z5 acres of land into 152 single family lots in the Low,Medfum Dencelty Residencial District (4-8. dwelling n u Its/acre within.the Victoria Planned Ccninunity, located at the northwert corner of Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon Way - APM 227-011-02, 03, 04, 07, and 227-081-08, 09. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DEV:�RIPTION: Air, A. Action Requested'. Approval of subdivision map, conceptual gradi-ng-p-lan—,conceptual landscape plan, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 5.2 dwelling unit.; per acre, C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North— 7 Vacant; Park ahT,52-n-001 South Vacant; Lo,- Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre) East Vacant; Medium Density Residential (8�14 dwelling units/acre) West Vacant; L—Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling uhits/acre) 0. General Plan Designations: Project Site - LOW-Meolum Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) North - Low--Medium Der?sity Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) South - Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling unitslacre) East - Low-Medium,Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) West - Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) ITEM J A p ROR t TENTATIVE TRACT 13442T WILLIAMTLYON CO. .' May 27, 1987 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant w,$th an average s•ope o f percent from north,to south. The site is bounded by the future park and school sites to the, north, Kenyon Way to the east, and Victoria ?ark Lane to the south. 1I. BACKGROUND:: On aecember 10, 1986, the Planning Commission approved "} the area development plan for the Vineyards North planning area. . The area development plan established the land ,use designations and 6-pecific road alignments. Subsee,jently, the Planning Commission approved Tentativ'i Tract '13279 (the "super block" tract) dividinq the Vineyards NorGh,into ten smaller planning areas and dedicating:, rights -of -way for arterial and collector roads, III. ANALYSIS• A. General: Tn aoplicant is proposing to develop 152 single FEMY °lots ranging in size from 4,098 square feet to 9,632 square feet ift area with an average lot size of 6,681 square feet in , area. The applicant is only proposing fo subdivide the,, F property'. grade the site, and install the infrastructure at ;.. this time. The "padded" lots will then -be sold to another . t° developer. The design review of the. product' .type would be reviewed and approved by the Planning' Ccmmis,,ion at a later date. B. Design Review Committee: Thy Design Review Committee (Everiek, Buller) vev` ewwed the proposal on May 7, 1981 and recommended approval. In approving the project, the Committez did bring up two areas of discussion - 1) Access for Lot 112 and 2) Front setbacks for the living area of the holjses• 1. In reviewing the access for Lot 112, the Committee stated that when the 02sign Review is submitted for this tract, special attention should be paid to the safety of ingress and egress of tithe lot, The Committee felt that !;ceess should be obtained from Street "D" rather than Street "Co. 2. With the submittal of the conceptual product type ,or this tract, the applicant is proposing units that locate a portion of the living area closer to the street than the garage (ten feet from property line). The garage would then be setback twenty feet from the property. On lots less than 7,200 square feet in area, the Victoria Community plan provides 1 °2. ■1 PLANNINEi'tatliSION "STAFF REPORT TENTA7IIN: IRAC`I 73442 - dtILLIAM LYON CO, w, lay 27, 1387 Page 3 k. ` standards for the setback of the garage. This setback can range from five to eight feet or greater than 18 feet from back of sidewalk or back of curb where no sidewalk 'exists. Additional analysis is provided in Exhibit "F ". In essence, the Community Plan does not address setL_`cks for this type of innovative house plotting. The proposed product type shown in Exhibit "C" is designed around a wider, shallower ; lot •that de- emphasizes the' garage by �t settings back further on the lot. As a result, . staff requests that Planning Commission discuss this issue and establish policy interpretation for the minimum front setback for the living area of the IJ residence. G. Technical Revl ew Committee: The Victoria Community Plan requ res sa recrea fTnai" vehicle storage be pr yided for twenty -five percent of the lots. This cad be,aeromplished through space on individual lots or tht-ough &9stru6tion of a designated storage elsewhere within the Victoria Planned - v J` Community. The typical unit plotting provided by the applicant states that the residences will be center- plotted with large enough side yards (10 foot minimum) to accommodate the storage of smaller recreational vehicles. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by e app cant. Staff has completed Par Al of f"e Environmental Checklist and has found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of the proposal. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, then issuknce of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS.`' This. project is consistent with the Victoria Planned communTfy and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, together with the recommended conditions of approval, is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Community, the Development Code, and City standards. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a public hearing and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. ■1 r PLANNING DMFiLSSU S OF REPORT ' TENTATIVE` TRACT, 13442 WILLIAM LYON CO.: � r° May 27, 1987, Jtl Page 4 VI. RECOMMENW- ,_'aA, 1f the Planning Commission determines that the 10- oo ron " s tb`4cic is cans°i tEnt with the intent or -the Community Pian, appP&,231 of Tentative Tract 13442 is appropriate through adoption Of the attached Rasolution with, cgnilitions and issue a Negative Declaration, If however, the Cn*,i ion , determines that the front setback to the living area is n'ot =Vonsistent with Tithe Community Plait, then the item should be referred back to Design Review Committee to review alternative product types for these '." lots. c, Re " F.. fall t, B.: u1 .City Pl ner BB:SM:te Attachinants: Exhibit "A" Location Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map A016 j F Exhibit "C" Conceptual Product Tjoe Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscaping Playa Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plana Exhibit "F" - Memo Dated February 25, 1987 Resolution of Approval with Cond3 ±;�iis i C b CITE' or. RANCHO CUCAMONGA rr � Tt%rL FEt c.�,� R.ANNGIC D[VISM EXH[L�tT = S !S SG10E= F GI' A - I 1 1 � a a CITE' or. RANCHO CUCAMONGA rr � Tt%rL FEt c.�,� R.ANNGIC D[VISM EXH[L�tT = S !S SG10E= F GI' .i �1 t .y 9r w' •Y Y 11 � 1 2 r x- �i• �� �.� � s §• / tit iirt .`* • z +. y rr YS` 'vj 1' •ova. • �I St 1;:..1•�t:i1.:1::st 7 1t .:i.ti fN:d,,s i z_ i� ill $xr111 '. . ............ r' x37i . L CITY OF T r RANCHO � CUCAMO A INORTf i CITY OF ITEM. == Y�/ 34�c� 7- RANCHO CUCAIN,10N,-GA PLANNING QIVI,SI, EXHIBIT �%" SCALE= I u Ell lu s W 3t 3 • ti i t. i .. W �XT ♦1 _ •. t i tsla ta Lu CITY Or _ ' d•e ` t.* tW \^fir s� },sa•.� �1�. .erg, 3 e � fiJ i .,, Pt.ANiVII\'G_ 171M.5I0I`tt lin H Lc ;gig ?t Y f: t= I CITY Or ITEM: IlAdNNCHG, TMLE--Q21gg PL-kNNL!t\G DTVLSQ.N EXHIBIT: .0 _ Z SaItLE. NE RLJ k § | !/\ $/ � ! � � q ? . � } ! � Zvi ai .y � . h| \- ym\/} CITY Or. rrE.% {�N��CU�MOINGA TITU- \ F-ANIN RG MqSK),N EXHIBIT. f) � a °Y r bri jig �y �z 17 7 . LA 4 CITY or, PUMNNL IING MrEK.j+i E.Ylit i'�; ray � r r CITY F RANCHO T C:U&% ��IC1 -GA rrrc E- nl 3 -e3 SCALF: �y= 33 3'� gr � r r CITY F RANCHO T C:U&% ��IC1 -GA rrrc E- nl 3 -e3 SCALF: i �I tiORT CITA}Y�, QT' PLkNNIING Dr\,ris --N E. HIMT: -- 'd SC&LE:- -' a N Ma Nf -E. I r W WE SHEET t4 j -SEE SHEET J r+ax srts 15 'trt � �'Y f • I'R. !,—r nacs.a au. 1 t r Al K Y' CITY or. RAINCHO CUCAMONGA FL kNNt I \G DRrMN ELF ttn� r: .r r• r � i . E s � ♦ \\ J'� 4 CITY OF, RA` CHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE PLAI�e'INIi\G i7(VISiON ttfrr. �'` i . � , �; � _ '*" /.,�.•� 2� . Oq!• .fit, �''' , ` S , �Mep o � _ Iv, ,i 11 tAr CITY OF. RANCHO CUCAMONGA T' O T, FLAN i,NG DI VISE N —•s E�cEitt3li = SG�tE� .�. CITY or, AGh rrE.% I.- RAINCHO CUCAMONGA TME- PLANNINC, DrVISIQN ` SFf tEta '. Ir it .� �•`�.; i� �a j M {I DRI CITY CSI. rrF-\ RANCHO HO CUC.AMONGA ALE: -- PL -kmihG Dr L i W Htt T: SCALE 4: vi U� Ile �. (F C� f r C•'>b �' Aq A y . _ ( F CITY or- UEN b PLANNING G L�i�ri5�J►�I .�•V�' swzo EXHIBM- ._ � Sc kL.E. t., 9 f r 1 o (F C� f r C•'>b �' Aq A y . _ ( F CITY or- UEN b PLANNING G L�i�ri5�J►�I .�•V�' swzo EXHIBM- ._ � Sc kL.E. x r a - , i If CITY OF Pl.AWIN<; Qivf,5nN E:Ci 4MT= ,3 5-2.1 SGtLE- E> 'r CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA MEMORANDUM I / F Z DATE: February 25, 1987 1977 T0: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner FROM: Dan Cokemati, Senior Planner SUBJECT: VICTORIA %ETBACK REQUIREMENTS ON SMALL LOTS It - This smemo is intended to provide policy interpretation regarding setbacks within Victoria. As you are aware, Decent tract submittals include house plotting concepts which revers --,plot the garage and bring the living space up closer to the stre��. Part III, Chapter I, Regulations & Standards for Development, contains graphic "typical- lot plans" for the various lot sizes which indicate setbacks for structures from the street. (these commence on page 208). For lot sizes of 7200- 10,000 sq. f and greater than 10,000 sq. ft., th,% typir�l lot p ans indicate fro.ityard setbacks of 18 feet and 25 feet, reipectivelyI as measured from the back of walk; For lot sizes ranging from 3,003 sq. ft. to 6,000 sq. fl-., the typical lot plans refer to the typical garage setbacks on page 204. The typ - "' garage setbacks are intended to dtscti1�,rage the storage of cars in a manner which blocks sidewalks or streets - therefore, setbacks a" generally either 5 -8 feet or greater than - `,feet from curb only (wnars: no sidewalk exists). The garage settbacks are 8 feet from curb or greater than 10 feet from back of walk where- sidewalk exists. The difficulty lies -in these smaller -?ots (Itss'than 7200 sq. ft.) if the garage is not plotted in the conve,�tional "up front" fashion. I believ that the it:tent of the Community plan was to'only allow setbacks less than 18 feet as a means to discourage cars overhanging the walk or street. Therefore the setbacks should bd inter reted to require a minimum of 18 eel firom t e res ent a structure to t e curb or side-Ka—TI-T7 S7 ewa exists), e In essence, the William Lyon Co has developed a new type of housing product that the Community Plan did not address. 5000 -6000 S.F. LOT tinter plot jj r r'Sldayo Y ' iW6 I • I sa :7. I GarcJ setbacks ;� Soon dr Lot: 4.5 -&.wnr 6000A'�SS •*�+� M"6m"w car" 60% fe rn a�itJa; �,,vprvt�,las�r r �p s215 TYPICAL iIARAGE SETEACKS r, � l ' FROM CURB ,ONLY — PRIiM CUfTa AND WALK (NO SIDEWALK)- dwr opms e Wkm wsriU4, ii's�k.+l Sys s!'°seLi bps Siw rJa AV c = tkc �m , afAmm�cWta S k }k; or tt�w r3 ix m ter »4, day �tar[+sq nxton+ioBrLa cK a p , aX4 ro mat �� o: bta �w rnblu ro+edxra� dmr: o,�Av nor txclm ulrh, sAr ex ZA I r8k ,ni RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNIW COMISSION OF THE CITY OF s 9;NCH0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13442 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13442 hereinafter "Map" submitted by The William Lyon Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County, of San Bernardino, State of Californ a, ,, desci,lbed as a residential tract subdivision of 29.25 acres of land Into 152 single fancily lots located at t5ri northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon flay (APN: 227-011-02, 03s= 04,;37, and 227- 081 -08 and 09), regularly came before the Pldnning Cam" ssion for public hearing and action on May 27, 1987; ,and £ WHEREAS, the City Planno,?'has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth �n the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read att,. considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports -ind has consie,red other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREF E, thg, Planning Commis,-.ion of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as t SECTION 1; The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to e�t —niiaE a Tract No. 13442 and the Map thereof: ,a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of try tentative tract its v consistent with the General Pl &,zs, Development- Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of r development proposed; I (d) PL- design of the subdfvision ;s not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to hummis, and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public. health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with Any easement acquired by the public at large, nckw of r�^d, fgr access through or use of the property within 'the proposed subdivision. f PLAN14ING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13442 WILLIkI LYO-N May�, 27, 1907 Page 2, (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the envirordeent and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2. Tentati ve Tract Map No. 13442, a cople of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following cindletions and-the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: Prior to-,'recordltioo of liact 13442, the final map for Tract 13279 shall b�zrecorded. 2. All pertinent conc'tions for Tract 13?'i4, as contained in Resoluti n 87-40, shall apply. 3, This map is belig approved as , i� Subdivision only. Any fzAture proposals for tfie Hevelopment Of five or i6're residintial units shall require Design Review apt,)roval prior to the issuance of building permits fot� any units. 4. The, "illiam'.1yon Company shall submit a disclosure statement for,thi5 tract to be r,'I",�twed and approved by the Citj Planne,�J, prior distribution to perspective ',Ieveloperst of this tract. The disclosure stitement shall include the ritv of Rancho Cucamonga's conditionr", rbquirements, and expectations for development' zIAndards and product types for this tract. , Iry applictticv for Desion ^be Review of this tract sban,� at,*ranied by a co�y of the apprqved disclo4ure stateaent signed by the developer. S. Landscape treatments at the pnd of -0e- side-on cul- de-sacs shall be designed to provide ar open view Into the Interior of the cul-cfe-sac,_ G. The faneag/wails required for the trart shall be consistent with th� fencing/walls Indicated on the cor,.i�ptual landscaping plan. Wood fencing ex,)osed to public view shall be treated with stain, paint or water sealant. Fencing on corner side yards and fencing alono Kenyon Way and Victoria Park Laiv(-t shall bz deci6rative block (encept trail fence��orFg Victoria Park Lane which sliall be per City standard). 5-24r 0 K] TENVATIk T:iACT 13442 - WILLL Lim May 27, ,87 Rage 3 7, Prior to orcupancy of more than 54 percent of the units within the tract, the pedestrian trails shall be improved with sidewalks, landsc -7ping, irrigation, and low level, lighting. The ?'� axis are to be reviewed 'anc apprdved by the Ciiy=uplanner and City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permi,,ts. 8. Any retaininn' gal ls used are to be 6'j, aximum' of 'four feet high. f- g. All retaining w ij:s vfs!We to the,, eral pub ic, e., na the street side of corn;ae,�.side yards aW within the front yard, --are to be constructed of a decorative material to the sal faction of the City ' Planner. 10. kil back of lot grade differe< 4als are to be a maximmof 12' feet. Engineering Division: 1. All pertinent conditions of''lract 13279 shall apply. 2. City maintained slopes steeper than 34 shall not exceeO,12 feet in height, 3. Notfe4 of intention to form and/or joie the Lighting and :Landscaping District shall be fled wit► the City Council pr°ar to .record;tlor of the map a� issuan. of Wilding r^itsy_ whichavar occurs- first. 4. The developer shall pay the pro'rata fee for future undergrodnding of overhead uti'4ties along Highland Avenue, as conditioned with Tentative Tract ;3279, prior to recordation 5. The trails to be maintained by the City shall be constructed and dedicated full width incorporating a, separation device such as a °Tall or xt.rb to 'define the limits to be maintained by the City. a PLANNING COtAi!4ISSTd' i6�tITIQ�d NQ. . f TENTAUVE TRACT 1344'L 'all.LUAM LYON May 27, 1987 Page 4 APPROVED Amn Abamo THiS E 27T4 ' W OF MAYS IOB7. PLANNING - "COMM6kON OF THE CITY GP I RANCHO CUCNJONGA BY: Larry e , rman 1 ATTEST: '—rad a e r Uep r.y Seer e ary i, Brad Buller,. Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comission of the City dt Rancho Cucamonga, do hllreby certify that, the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introdticed,7' as5ed, and odopted'by the'Planning Commission of She ti •'' City of Rancho Cucatidlga, it a regular meeting of the planning Comission W-1 d% on the 27th day of Pray, 1037; by the following vo.te- to -��: AYES: COVISSIONERSe NOES; C'dSMISSIONEEtS: ' ABSENT: COMMISS%NERS: 1 / 'SF 4 a czY°r�u •t ii � �.: a°A�'n Yom. i'c� p�N, C6 S��A ►�� �,y OL b`Da� 4QO� �tsti, w as�'o a3 iv :�� y$Q3Yaae�Sa+ vs2 nnN N a� 1 R C ®4 •., C tl py� � ■r� 1 j � Y ` Y t, ✓CC O �' i -'� mcm ^ .k lJ °g­ 64 QCy V�� ^YGC4 wuL 4uS cn �t ;N,c c3' e,�w .e,�.��i� Q,V 72-1YDp. ua �fiir' °gu Y�L.a �. .°¢.iqi ° » °�m�;'.� bo` a» iT g`eu9 ALA »° f. ON1i 7? •+1on�� o13c SIC rR,om ebn.Y °G3.' 1jL / y -0 11r O =. Vz ot$ Y ^'.y9M e.� G r �yV9. Y '. Q'c/ 4^,v �ip N y r QQ+ t,w�oNyB $«�T wNrdc gc'e ° y�eryy. 'e efts .^4tP� ens0. �_a�F ^ ^ ��.0.1 . ill-71 7 aiw�''�S >M 1% +sJCU� « °o ^y •'�..a t i�= ': �'q �'� .irY o • 6 i Ns M. L^M ST fi 'all wu fyy xNx C O o Y O o w 0 J�� �C G w• !14 e �g. f} z Q= n n w Y C Q MJt NM p4,r y •437 � i + �i i. J�� ear« s,. is $air% ` $'Pi�y iN ..°�� ?SAL' r s °gaq $ •� ° Y u°N, «.a, �►`' YVy° t•��:M/ �,, „;,�y�`�Y�i� far ��.A +q° '�CC ` ^:- 4tl °C 2'°�Ci Dp�g4q Vee.CCa O °� 9qa LAC V p Yb 6� „ p Q N:, y O P-,-2g f °^ u4 =� r.'. jam. Y.�!3.4 h� „ccY. M j0 y y°•iq `Q gip, 0 c� C�y iy oa =DA "Y•yN ' C 2 Z yp „�. Yna°...fi. CS �C�b YCL yIy ?3V �. U1: a �/� °5N �yyyT ®vet 6 Q i p° Y b. CI M ti pp. � {/y +� C. Y 6 Z. ^at4�tl.�yV Cq qG�• UY pi Np o °p r g5 u`` gMO 4 qrE.�” -to aC,�� � � x= $yeapyyyz p L C q• � Q q r 3 \C C Y N 4 y ^ U C R C Y @ N G O.aW Yy ^C 9 NYC -5 Ir-R iz C�^ - - q � YO a N. y �3 Z"a m §Nd 3Y .. t •��C„ V ®by L 4 V y1 C.» «yr p, G6i I Oy V..y «{�'`■ �s1 N.6N —1 C mA 3s A.00 c1 94 @r_Q� C° y Yb is °Y4 i Y. C +�19t �q.L$. ^i �yY °lu OOCU ^`� y^ AGN SYVV +V L�Lry4YC Y.eq. MVfM 44« u N ¢ I Via OTI. C.Q Sa Cy OY` cVV4.N �4 s�g2q ay 'Tj '_ g a ps 63a » ►v u L^{L'¢tl °1Y C1Y� `M iy'N _ }�{•�.yy jr �yC C��y nY � qy @qyY r�p YT v F Cr VU VL O'ebY �j fi ° Y bYOY.r d p -C W� ONH V O. w . q Si `n —Y pz ^y py iF W 4I C+ U C dpi O- C q„ q1 C r q� i IL _Y. � O. ° p d „ � ° � � S M ^. � AIrC.. ! � L •. � C M + g� + p � 6. 01 � - O y ^ 1 ti. F — 9 i4 pC _ Gy YC ��Lr VNY ypp �sd w °° CN YL L� ^d Y��rN YL�y „Y° �A,'n R. q' r'hJ f °�^ y~ N�' ��.YO V�q�. C.� QN.w x. • °rS�M �_N c� „O 45- Aw ' Y > ` ca„ a c orb r3 u aae"o =fa ag ` e= a y�- x R,- J!—% �.a ac °`e. �• »a .L.c„o ie .°. »a y+:§ wY UMV et Lui�aN rcgsnd ID Al C01�. CO.. O O¢ tTy 0004"n. JSN L'�� Ct t, V esi •- a.. ei,,,,v nm aYC �". � o.x :H off G' aM Ya 4Y Corn ° > °. tCC.^a �.L is�� �• C�U .� H iq V a N C H C, S GN YOY1 p }tT y �N YQ CL1 /TY C C �L. w.w H �O � • d � CC °Y, � 60 asCp °. °A Y � OHO Yr 1Y: C w. yc v.�dNH$y�L�I-G Ou .. Yw. gd 9 .� ar du+KV Y H_$i u$5 YO w.N YO:.H �1 tutu +yam� CCC<_QQO ... ■ y S Y I L O Ol '�[ N H A �' �. y r L L p G Y A A w y V M a G �wVp"1 °�� i 2 � y LN awl 6chw Pat Y q ° y't �'L 4 u M �. . ■■Ott yy wtt ra LNN I C 6`i LVP YO1w NM.Yi 6CY ypypC �J Ap ice. s� � p40` L u 1vS 6.s" H Cw wL Vp L.t. K 'sNn .ei tMV.e..LgtOI +w60 sam 6v t..gdq a :gypq'd y aN $ ajangrd. a� p yY_.o..t�.+e G C.CN^ � e4 wr �� aLi��' �� Hwy SHQ�1YwY E3 N�t 9q0� a q2,d oSm -aim z is p<i -1. sPo 4 vc Q ■� CN NCbye `. rH, *.:.;,g �IIO�. c wLA� x ~` HO 5 Od Oi R_CC fi.n� aPL YbH. pL. 44 N+ . n� uY.. •:i SpO Y�Lip r Y artl w q LY ^YY.� S V'� ■■ ■f pwN z a�~ b < S V O C H H °rw. °�° t+ i �e e i p ru�w ._+ •t yyy7yiw .om cc ei ■V wy V As too p - ..Y+yW.Qi 'uQ u TO tC` M4 L 2 NQS. `. yO O3s4 .1. i OY Y y Y pc w w Lo �m �.'.gy[ Y� °t. Nf YY��y�L. K.MHO '+t: AirA it KVN rAw `tJ QV HOM�q: iO.0 410 S.rn lnr�°. K� t ^� N ��� Cn6i sm _ 4 U. L� ay v]� "tCYCs .!'YO OYpY Y ■ W � �v Y■� Y a m tilt «a L 4 yyy ins g R �� �i =SJ nit Rpg j Y O aoGr�{- 12 4' Yv 4 S SN 7 C4M N .s K L' O C rtYt. Y e Nb ♦ 44d.YS.. °Ci X. �4Gp MVy�Y° ^" • Al: LS V ♦ LL O Y •y yu°40 +♦i 4LEU ` .. •^M �sO @bi. N Y �, .n eO•R� Yy �CyO. �¢ �y �O N�� $6 Da T� ®nnni qL e.- �� bad a$' • 3 .Y.♦g,ip� yy�.�. two � 41 Y rL�ocC. ~ Y °Y� ��� Cn6i sm _ 4 U. L� ay v]� "tCYCs .!'YO OYpY Y ■ W � �v Y■� Y a m tilt «a L 4 yyy ins g R �� �i =SJ nit Rpg j Y O 4i �l� aoGr�{- u; a�4� �4�� Nb ♦ �4� °Ci �4Gp MVy�Y° a • s LS e�yo: 9weL •y yu°40 �$L .. • 3 ~i yy�.�. two � 41 Y rL�ocC. ~ Y °Y� �• py� ' i�PPZ C� CC 6 Y ��V t�• s >SC CO yy � a�� GµpVWY �$ CSC � tV. �p 40Vw uYoqVY SNN S yq4 y m ` wa �tt +•.. b /L ♦Mw 4Y` V` 4 o"5 V.. 72- � ya y lyO�' J q �:' . ! � �N'@Y�C Cv YL e M:yA �NV �N AJ� j � �: Y M.r q g' CL� iA°LN '` Y gj•y _�Qy,Y i �gis'oN �� Moot N qa c y-2 +♦L e ° a�Y..y �ys.N"oi f ea >e= c °u �•Yr .L.� 'w� jp vc •°•=i �:i �. c'r ;, g'gn �' w - ����� �eY �:Q 4,$' vd °��. �w�. tiC "tea Y YV NCs L' 4'�i!'"ar OCt A tv Cis* NL. Y� Yr Vi YO�p' Y S �N10 «YL� Y•u C� _ N~ _ Y0. °N HE OY• L. 4�. OO4,, Pl. PQy' L t C`♦ iC On Qpy. p !sl 4i �l� yy4 V 9� {q,6h �w p� g9p S 6b � ,i Cl �• C S � •' V O a C . QygY aop VYA�� yGOYcO. YY G�R �. A � ��`�VVV. � „�y° a ■yb ��I GC ■yrr p�qp.1 N � � � \. Ws'�. y. V Y�OwC 4...a■fff� �� � }.� Y ti� w 'f �. } C I YbL mayy, VY ya Zil- rA.5.7; aN�ti Vt 4.�i C1 m$4 W” La° SC C Y � ]4:q .Ry fyyf ° ♦ per. � M +! • �.y4 YN. �Y 1.. iNwy • OLS' �� ' .... Lt �yi_C4 wL y I i! lYY+r. �yrt0 / f!Y. R3S S N 19�jj;. ,Q4�w ce WWo 3 " = °"fig �pNA. 4 IL C it 5. fa, pCp �r'Gp3 CM. 76 E U'� a .2 Y Yu^^``. y °wil. V'`yt-5 i Y z ii Q C� . 4v Yiee• Y a�a�C � V� �q� M1p YOw �1.�.� '. G V� �iyi 6Lyy Y6O Otl�wl Y °/•w� wy r'Q Rp��. l`�► .� - r� ±= N O��: N1�,LyyIe rbip +ydya '°'• mJ yp� ^fL LFdai w-Y..p 16 t,3 ° t 5 t� tt D 'i-a U f Y S m � > 1 N >. IYI . °1� H + N K6pp Y a C i G1 qCo . ptl .N � jY� ,9 � p y WM7Y� y Q W 4 : 0 -4 W; AC K0 eSt r Ap 1 IN 4 IJ tj W .Q 4 Y a6pL �C �, C Y L• R. GN N °a ZZ Zo Is Ikz— V .. yea, &�€ 9.aS' 6 1 Y YW.w �Y u 71. at s w ��• � €� ya � .2 3� a g ate. g:— �� _ +°a-° �.ya. •n SY :g =�> �Y ` °v av Noys«s qd G• �y II. +N r#Y C Ye �� Y�. ONV iw d u`. —j- y.. : o it -CU a°., '�`.'Li i, iir $�' cva �►° r. ,� :+�. rye. tl a -C I 1 ( t EIA V Y 4 O dW «g i dz Z ' acC'. Lv..EYYY yrhe a.ye' 8 4 Rw gee 2 ,> k .. IL ! 2 Ise Q�J ii r 5 Kai Gur D► $ Lsr J � N a- e rn z V �N11 Kd''L� W"g a i'13.p <A ai EIA �E s� " ' acC'. Lv..EYYY yrhe a.ye' 8 4 Rw gee 2 ii:T.. �.tj C: -bwS ! 2 Ise gNYQ y o�a. y�n Kai Gur D► $ Lsr J � -z i.�a a- rn z V �N11 EIA `1 aMrioN v' to uonaM 5gpts. vw G apy ?tv... aytC�pp g_X to Zzi a c Yr y v L �� ❑p g �Pepp�.� L J ' y V3y tl Y�:3 Y � O 1. � ■ 4 pp»= TgtL V q rv=iy O t �»Z ra�V s� Ag L M ZLap¢< aa7t y =4t[yL ■■OI. AA1 L �C � ayV qW..+ �. ��9+ 4YN C��q u ■y i:.c YT.G� �VY/� e40 L� � rL.y yihS' �� DM sr g.Y .m- <W n- `1 aMrioN v' to .0 vw apy Zzi v �s �� ❑p a� �Pepp�.� J ' y V3y tl Y�:3 Y � O 1. � ■ p m.SV� pp»= TgtL V q rv=iy O t �»Z `1 DATE: 10z FROM: BY: SUBJECT: -`- CITY' OF RANCHO CUCAM('NGA STAFF,qEPORT LID. i May 27, :987 F z Li > Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission 1977 Brad Buller, City Planner Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -026 - W 1 Y Ulh KANGHU LUGAMUNUA - Ail apps ica%i,)n to ameno the Land se omen o e "Eeneral Plan from A) Heavy Industrial to General Industrial for approximately 106 acres at the future southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Utica Avenue to the future intersection of Arrow Highway and Milliken Avenue; and for approximately 52 acres at the southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Rochester Avenue and for approximately 7.6 acres on the southeast corner of Sti.wanda Avenue and Whittram Avenue; and B) General industrial to Industrial Park for approximately 35 acres or, the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and White Oak Avenue; and C) General. Industrial /Rail Served to General Industrial for all currently designated as General Industrial/ Rail Served. 1. ABSTRACT: The City has recently completed the extenC:.e process of rev s ng the Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISP). The revisions "fine- tuned" the activities allowed within each land use district to better reflect current development trends. This in -- house /City- initiated,,eequest is to amend the General Plan Land Use Map to accurately indicate the more specific industrial use designations as provided in recent ISP amendments. II. BACKGROUND: In September, 1986, the City Council approved the reversed- 9-dustria; PPea Specific Plan. This General Plan Amendment is t: a :,st S.he General Plan Land Use Element to better reflect the srecific 'land use designation:, of the recently approved changes. These amendments include a change from Heavy. Industrial to General Industrial for approximately 165.5 acres; from General Industrial to Industrial Park for 31.,' acres; and the category of General Industrial /Rail Served to General Industrial. ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSIOR STAFF REPORT GPA 87 -02B - City of Rancho Cucamonga f, May 27, 1487 Pala 2 IIi. PROJECT SITE DESE.71TIO4; (See Exhibit "i "� AreiL�A } Action: Amend the Land Use Map of ;be General Plan from Heavy Industrial to GenetaT,!Irdustrial. Size and Location: 106 acres, future southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Utica Avenue to the futi,Nre ntersection of Arrow Highway and Milliken Avenue; and for 52 acres, southeast corner of Arrow Highway cnd Rochester Avenue; and for 7.5 acres, southcnt corner cif Whittram Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue. Area B: Action: Amend the Land Use Mar of the General Plan from General Industrial to Industrial Park Size and Location: 35 acres, northwest corner of Arrow Highway and White Oak Avenue. Area C: Action: Amend the Land Use Map from General - IndustrialJRail Served rf,the General Plan. Size and Location: See Exhibit IV. ANALYSIS- Area A: (See Exhibit "l ") The 106 acres located at the southeast corner of Utica AvLntie and Arrow Highway was changed from Heavy Industrial to General Industrial ii the Industrial Area Specific "lan to allow for expansior. of Light Industrial uses along Arrow Highway in order to permit a better transition between the Industrial;Pz!.rk areas of the Haven Avenue Corridor to the west and the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park to the north. The 52 -acre site located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Arrow Highway was changed from Heavy Industrial to General Industrial. IC-1. fl PLANNING COMMISSJBN STAFF REPORT GP/`;.87 -028 - City of Rancho Cucamonga May 27, 1937 Page 3 A i' At the southeast corner of Whittram and Etiwanda Avenues, 7.5 acres of Heavy Industrial land was changed to General Industrial F1 to improve the Light Industrial _poten },al.,along Etiwanda Avenue and protect the road from Heavy Industria:t impacts, These 165.5 acres currently designated as Heavy Industrial have additionally been determined to be excess Heavy Industrial with the more appropriate use being General Industrial. Area 8:, The 35, .acres cn the northeast corner of White Oak )kvenue and Arrow Highway, shoull be designated as Industrial Park as it has been in the Industrial Area Specific Plan (I.S.P.). Area C: The recent ISP amendment from, General Industrial %Rail Served to General ; ndustrial requires those businesses that are adjacent to railroad tracks to develop their structures to include rail access. Those structures that are witt)in the designated area and do not have access 4o rail service wil`i no longer be required to develop their structures with rail - access. This change will eeflect this ISP provision. V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Initial Study has been Completed by staff and no signs icant adverse environmental impacts were identified to be associated with the proposal. gazed upon the conclusions of the Initial Study, staff recommends issuance J a Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 87 -02B. VI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of the subject enera Plan Amendment, decide that the, change would promote tine land use goals and policies of the Geu� -c,al Plan-­-Would not be material.1i detrimental to the'adjacenc properties or would not cause significant adverse environmental impacts, the following are the findings that aye necessary upon approval: A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan; and industrial portion of the community; and B. The Amendment does promote goals of the Land Use Element; and C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious ors detrimental to the adjacent properties; and G. That the subject property is suitable for tte ue�� permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, si.:C and compatibility with existing land usl i.r surrounding areas. ker gs PL KING COMMn4 N S,1 FP REPORT` 6PA 87 -028 - City -of Rancho Cucamonga. s' May 27, 1987 Page 4 0 ,a. VII. CORRESPL:DENCE.- llfls; item h4s been advertised as a public hearing in: 'ae�i °4Qr Newspaper. >f VIII. RE "Q44MDATION., Staff recommends approval of the,Amwcbk�nt. If oa Minds the Amendment to the General -'Plan Lund Use Map and test - watrranted, adoption of the attached Resolutina., ' recomeendiny appro4at to the City Cc gncjl and the issuance of a -> - -Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Res 4ully s 'tted Brad e l� City P annex _ BB:CK:te fl Attachments; Exhibit "I" - `--industrial Arealap Resolution of Approval I 6' I, 1r .ti; ker gs 11 blt "1' e x y.y 6 + C Z t7 D H! � + CL i w 0 U i m blt "1' RESOLUTION NO. ,A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNZA, RECG*ENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 87 -02B. AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 87 -028. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby makes the followin'ings; A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would nci be materially injurious or detrimental to the ad;�cent properties. SECTION 2: The General Plan Land Use Msp shall be amended as follows: A) From Heavy Industrial to General Industrial for approximately 106 acres at the future southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Utica Avenue to the future intersection of Arrow Highway and Milliken Avenue; and for approximately 52 acres at ,the southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Rochester Avenue and for. approximately 7.5 acres on the - southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Whittram Avenue; and B) F•om General Industrial to Industrial Park for approximately 35 acres on the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and White Oak Avenue; and C) From General Industrial/Rail. Served to General Industrial for all areas currently designated as i General Industrial/ Rail Served. SECTION 3: A nzaative Declaration is hereby rerommended for adoption by t e ity Council fol- ,'.is General Plan Amendment, hase� upon the completion and findings of the _nitial Study. liT f; k-1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 87 -02B - City of'Rantho Cucamonga May 27, 1981 t, Page 2 •`: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning t Commission does hereby recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 87 -02B �r to the City Council. APPROVED; 1p)ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1987. PLANNING COWISSIA Oh,'THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �€ BY: Larry T. MUM, , Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bu I er, Deputy Secretary ? I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Plann4ag Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, ae heresy certify that the foregoing Resolution was a jy and regularly introduc°d, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission, 0 the a City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular sheeting of the Planning Cohmissf6n held on the 27th day of May, 1987, by the following vote -to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS- k-1 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Gv+,yo STAFF REPORT } ; 1z 1977 May 27, 1987 Chairman and Members of the Planning- ,.ammission Brad Buller, City Planner Debra Meier, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 87 -04 - SCHLOSSER F R CO. A request to reduce "the number of parking spaces required for a manufacturing use, eliminate the requirement for trees to be planted I for every 3 parking stalls, and also eliminate the requirement for trees to be planted adjacent to structures, 1 for every 30 linear feit of building dimension, for the development of two new manufacturing buildings at an existing, manufacturing facility on 17.4 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9) located at -the scuthwest Corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue - APN'229 -111 17, 18. RELATED FILE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -09 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the Variance and issuance of a Negate Dec aration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Vacan, (Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 8 South Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 9 East - Vineyards, Vacant Land; Industrial Specific Flan Subarea 8 West - Vacant; Industrial Specifi: Plan Subarea 9 C. General Plan Designations: Profect Site --Heavy Industrial North - General Industrial South Heav% Industrial East - Heavy Industrial West - Hea,6y Industrial 0. Site Characteristics: The site is surrounded by . Vacant land and old vineyards. Topography consists cf alluvial deposits .;loping toward the south at a rate of approximately 2 percent.' - ITEM L --7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 87-04 SCHLOSSER FORGE CO. May 27, 1987' Page 2 II. ANALYSIS. A. General: This application has been filed concurrently with Develo nt Review 87-09. Vproval of this 'Variance is necessary for approval .qf the site plan as,submi-tted. 1. Reduciio�n of required,number of parking spaces. The Inclustrial SpecATIC Man requires maiiufacturing uses to park at a rat'lo of one space per UD square feet 1�f - building area,,, The following chart Identifies total parkina-demand for the site: Parking Calculations-— Number of Number of Type Square Parking , spaces, Spaces of Use Eoo�a I ge _1ati Requ.rad Provided Office 16,500 1/250 66 Manufacturing 157,740 1/500 31,51 Warehouse 21,600 1/1000 Total 195�840 11873 (�kverage) lhe reduced number of parking spaa�az Is d4e- to the nature -of the machinery houseu %Ithfi,', this facility. The total number of persons required to run the operetion in the two neit structuwes (53,000 square feet) is 8 per shift. Currently, there are 164 parking spaces on site, with 70 spaces beirg added with the site expansion for a total -of 234. The greatest nusaber of employees on any e,,�e-shift is 146, even with 8 additional employees, , io� the new facil'ity, the need is well belovi the US spaces that will be available. 2. Elimination of landscape tandards. a. Within pat,king lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every three parking stalls; and b. Trees shall bv planted in areas of public view adjacent to structures at a rate,,of one tree per 30 linear feet of building dimension. A0 AN PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 87 -04 SCHLOSSER FORGE CO. May 27, 1981 Page 3 The intent of the Industrial Specific Plan requikment for trees within parkfng lots is to provide at least 50 .percent of the parking area with shade. Thus softening the visual mass of the parking lot as well as cooling the pavement surface and the vehicles. The applicant's request to delete this { standard is based upon continuity rtith existing parking facility design. Further, the applica.t contends that landscaping would hinder the movement .AAf equipment on -site. The intent 'of the requirement for trees to be planted adjacent to structures is t6. interrupt exp- ,tsive horizontal and vertical surfaq s and soft- -n the appearance of large structures from the streetscape. The proposed Building 5 will have extensive landscaping along the north and east elevations as they are aajacent to the streetscape. The south and west elevations of Building 5 and all' four elevations of Building 4 will have concrete landings for forklift operation ar:d access to the bn >kding. In this case, the elimination of the two landscape standards discussed does not imply any reduction in minimum landscape area (five percent) required for this development. In fact, including the streetscaps landscaping and the lunch park, the site contains nearly twice the minimum requirement for a development in the Heavy Industrial District. B. Environmental Msessmentc Upon review of Pars: I of the Initial- study and completion of art II of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant environmental impacts related to the approval of this variance. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: State Law as well as the City Zoning Ordinance, gives the _lanning Commission the auth'rity to approve a variance for certain development standards only when special circumstances apply to the project. Also, variances may also be granted when strict enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Ordinance. i F 9 PLANN'M'C`O*1,SSION ST.. - :F REPORT VARIANCE 87-04 SCHLOSSER FORGE CO. May 27, 1987 P g 4 In this case, the special type of machinery used is not labor intensive (8 employees for 53,000 squa,le feet of proposed building space) pnu is a unique facility as compared to other industrial compan.0s in the City. Building use and design are unique in that lanaings are necessary on all four sides for forklift operations. The design solut' -on effectively utilizes IO percent of the net site area, in landscaping along the streetscape and the lunch park to mitigate any adpverse visual effects. Cansequently, the plan is consistent with the objgctives of the Industrial Specific Plan and strict interpretation of 0e Code would .result in unnecessary hardship. In ,iddition,'the granting of this variance would not be construed as a granting: of a special privilege and is not detrimental toL the pubrie hearth- safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements im the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has beer. advertised as A public hearing in e a y" eport newspaper and ail property owners within 300 fee c e pro3ec site have been notified. in addition; public hearing notices have been posted on the subject property. 1 Y. RECOMENDATION• Staff recommends approval of„ Variance 87 -04 through- a od'ip ion of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully s tted t .Brad B ler City an BB Did: to Attachments: Exhibit "A" — Industrial Specific an Subarea 9 Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" Landscape Plan Applicant's letters Resolution of Approval S 4 f i e S • .� ki i i � 1.:.•. «.«,...., � ••� ~« 1: n �r— .__mr~— ,. ^r.'a"�"���� t � wv' � ........ eerre.,.sncssasialrtsiv f" f- 6s� (�` ,� p." !I 1 ii'iNSiiii i !1{ t'�t}g •.l r .. • W� fN+wACM1O4 ! a FROMM R jt sz _ z ss t• ■URA i � i sa...^'" f- .^.s�r�kfYT� j � �+k•.,w � f; WI 1 1117 MpMI Yf�Itlt t7 f l •Y/iSl 1' s A• -q � f 1 NORTH CITY OF ITE`eI: RANCHO CUCA 10N,, GA TITLE: ` PLAiNNI';G DIVISIQN EX ` HIBi'I': � ' SCA,tE: + , NAMIAQMW ' fil���.�����if��i���li��.i�7�ff ��:... �uw+o� r•I�• 1 ' t t, uoavm MAN I,•0' KWfh: NVIl706JR 'A o-I5> ) EKE >nq x,•AS) I NORTH CITY I RANCHO r C ;'T�, . M T -v4- HO C,LAN, ,Ia GA Tom: PI.ANNING DIVISION EXHIBrr ---. •+, SEAL, i RESOLUTION A .RESOLUTION OF THE RAN Nr1 CUCAMP� PLANNING COMMISSION ' PROVING VARIANCE N0, t'?,-04 T1 REDUCE THE NUMHV� , OF 1 'IRKING SPACES` REQUIRED "'f0,f A MANUFAfTURING USE; ELIMINATE'TNE REQUIREMENT FUEL TREES TO BE ' KANTED 1 FOR EVERY 3 PARKING STAI -LS; AND ALSO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR TREES TO BE PLANTED AWACENT TO STRUCTURES, 1 FOR EVERY 30 LINEAR FEET OF BUILDING DIMENSION LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER. OF ARROW ROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE .IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT - APH: 229- 111 -17, 18. WHEREAS, on the 26th day of February, 1987, an application was filed and accepted on the ebove- described project; and WHEREAS, on the. 27th day. -.jf May, 1987, the Planning. Commission helr a duty advertised public hearing pursuort to Section 65854 of the California Governmont Code; and WHEREAS', the number of parking /,'spaces required on -site is 402 and only 234 will be provided. Uua to the nature of the machinery housed within this facility, only 8 employees are necessary for,:z`!;DOo square feet of building area and the greatest number of empl oV. ss on any one shift will be 154, therefore, 234 spaces will be more than adequate to serve company needs; and WHEREAS, the request for deletion of landscaping o site is based upon cc:itinuity with existing design and that onsite landscaping will hinder moveimect of equipment; and WHEREAS, the south and west sides of Building 5 and all sides of Building 4 require concrete landings for forklift operation and access to the buildings; and WHEREAS, the elimination of the two landscape standards does not imply any reductfor in required landscaped area (5 percent of net lot area minimum). SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That strict or literal titerpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with ti,- objectives of the Development Code. 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conWi ,.ds applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to -other properties in the same district. ATTEST: �Rr—ad Buller,. Deputy Secretary I, o -_ Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly,iintroduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the rAty of Ral,icho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held ?n the 27tn day of May, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CONISSIONERS: NOES: COMI5SIONERS: ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: { 'LANNING C044T AION *',Ok4UTION % VARIANCE 87 -04 S!st l,05S51Z FORGE`' �\ . May 27, 198 �'� `\ Page 2 r 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of 'privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. 4; That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified In the same district. S. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or Welfare, or matewially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CISCAMONGA BY: Larry T. Memel, Chairman ATTEST: �Rr—ad Buller,. Deputy Secretary I, o -_ Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly,iintroduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the rAty of Ral,icho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held ?n the 27tn day of May, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CONISSIONERS: NOES: COMI5SIONERS: ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: { c. 4. r- �-1 L CITY,0F WWCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 27, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM., Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT_ REVIEW 87-09 SCHLOSSER FORGE - The development of No manufacturing Buildings. Toff-annq 53,000 square feet at their existing facility on 17.4 acres of land within the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial t. District (Subarea 9) located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue APN: 229-111-17, 18. RELATED FILE: VARIANCE 87-04 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. A. Action Requested. Approval of site plan, building elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Usq,and Zoning: North - Vacant; Industrial ZipeCITIC Plan Subarea 8 South - Vacant; Industrial fpecific Plan Subarea 9 East - Vineyards, Vacant Land; Iridustrial Specific Plan Subarea 8 West - Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 9 C. General Plan Designations: rroject 51te - ffe-a-vy—I-nUu--strial North - General Industrial South - Heavy Industrial East - Heavy Industrial West - Heavy Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site is surrounded by vacant land and old vinegar s. --Topography consists of alluvial deposits sloping toward the south at a rate of approximately 2 percent. M / ij LANNING COFMISSION STAFF REPORT F'm OR 87 -09 - ,SCHLOSSER FORGE May 27, 1987 Page 2 E. Parking Cm`,µ iatians: Number' of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use .footage Ratio RequivO Provided Office 16,500 11250 Ci Manufacturing 157,740 1/500 315 Warehouse 21,600 1/;000 21 Totil 195,840 1/873 , 402 234 (average) Note: See related file Variance 87 -04 for explanation of - parking calculations. II. ANALYSIS» A. General: The present Schlosser Forge facility con . Ea`' 142,840 square 'feet of building space including admfn'r�-;�ration, warehouse and manufacturing uses. This., applicati %n requests approval of two additional manufacturiifg buildings totaling 53,000 square feet. Future plans indicate development of an additional 107,770 square feel: of warehouse and manufacturing space.. The Schlosser Forge Company entered into a Development Agreement with the City with provisions for expansion of the facility on the 27.7 acres currently owned by the company. The tievelopment Agreement provides for expansion to be in compliance with all land use standards and policies in effect at the time the document was approved (August, ;1986). The term of the agreement is for 40 years. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Chitiea, McNiel, o eman rev ewed the project on May 7, 1987. The major aspects of the project reviewed by the Committee included landscaping along Arrow and Rochester and compatibility of the proposed architecture to the existing structures on site. Both Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue are Special Boulevards which require a 45 -foot minimum landscape setback from the curb face. As proposed, Building 5 sits 59 feet from curb face. However, landscaping along the entire length of Rochester and a portion of Arrow must consider a flood protection wall and/or berm.. The following two alternative solutions were discussed to resolve the aesth tic concerns along the streetscape in regards to the flood wall along the north and east side of Building 5: A4•2 0 PLANNO-0 WMKSkON STAFF REPORT DR 87-09 - SMOSSER FORGE May 27, 19877 Page 3 1. The wall of Building S could 'be strengthened as a flood protection wall and undulatir3 mounding provided within the landscaped area; or 2. Fill in the area behind the wall to provide a level section. Additional m, ommendations were as follows: 3. Along the Rochester streetscape, the flood wall south of the driveway should be moved back to the 4$-foot setback. Undulated wq.nding and special landscape treatment should be provided. The final design of the streetscape shall be subject to further Commmittee review prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The landscaping:within the streetscapes shall include evergreen trees of sufficient density to screen the east elevation of Building 4 and the loading area at the west end of Building S. - 5. The proposed buildings are to be coordinated with the existing facility using the same material (metal) and colors (gold and brown)'. Building 5, which faces Arrow and Rochester, has incorporated a slumpstone block trim along the base of 'the building to add continuity with the existing administration building also facing Arrow. The applicant has incorporated the flood wall into Building 5 to eliminate the need for a freestanding flood wall out at the street. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee has reviewed the pro3ect and determined that with recom:ended Condit-tons of Approyal, the project is consistent with applicable City Standards and Ordinances. The developer has requested that he be allowed to complete the utility under-rounding in phases because of the large cost. If the Comission, feels phasing is appropriate, the following can be added to Engineering Division Condition No. 1 as part IV: 1. The segments adjacent to the portions of Arrow and Rochester to be Improved shall be undergounded prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first for this first phaso. PLANNING COMWEISSION STAFF REPORT OR 87;_;69 - SCHLOSSER :FORGE May 27, 1587 Page 4 2. 1-he remaining segments shall oe',` undergroundbd upon completon of the next phase of on -site development, within two years �f completion of the first _ - phase, or in conjunction with undergroupl.ng on adjacent property, whichever should occur first. 3. The in -lieu fees for 'undergrounding on the opposite side of Rochester shall be paid to the City within 6 months of the completion of that undergrounding. 4.. Items 2 and 3 above shall be secured by a lien agreement prior ., to the: issuance of building permits for this first phase. D. Fnvironmentai Aa;`essment• Upon review of Part I of the Initial btu an comp Alkown or Part 11 of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant environmental impacts related to the d6velop"nt of this project- III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistert with the Industrial an and -the General Flan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impar:ds. In addition, the proposed site plan and building design, together with recommended conditions, art: in com,iliance with the Industrial Specific Plan and City standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Pgproval ol� Development Review �31-tig oc►yFi- adoption of the attached gesolut ion and conditions of ,.pproval and issuance of a ?negative Declarat ;on. Resp fully subritte Brad Bul e City Finer BB:DM:&e Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhioit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Flan Exhit!i; "D" - Building 4 Elevation Exhi`,ic "E" - Building 5 Elevation Resolution of Approval with Conditions = ?I' CITE' OF le r V NORTH TITLE' EYHIbrr. A LE i..� .... M�•i�'IS'[ 41 N, ! 4fIf V NORTH CITE' OF ITEM: Aft RANCHO " CUC AIN'101' G . TITLE.- PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT .- SCALE: °I 017 it ........... ........... Q) QD C 71 t I nay cn"4 L*JVCMCAPS LgcWNm Ni arr rmf PC" AW"r TPU nttwy ftwWorM Vcz Tpom rAPY- ^rKC Imm 1p 0 i NORTH CITY OF RAINCHO CvC .NL'IOINGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISIQN EXHIBIT. .-- . SCALE- p " 1 ir[R :hart. T% NORTH CITE OF ITEt1: _ i ' e -7- RAN,,,,ciO CUCANJO� rGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISI(),N EXHIBIT.-- SCALE. i t Ri�u'�111W_ 1_ iiTtt nnnt_rt _.ntq Ulll (ti ^it. -- _ pl' v�.n� ! "'• `�1� �ilifiilhlllllli�!(illilflu Ilf VIII ! f t 1 I Ili 11`i i����lii.� _- � .: � � � ,, , � ;t ;• � ,►� �, r r I,LI,I I,i,.,�,1.� ►.. _III�I�Illli.Illil►If11lIIIII (III!(I�I[Illllli(6�►II� ttl,i �I��hli Il�t� ►�ji :I R78i1s�.4 f "A�1?" 'd �P6�1 r �� ! � � �! � � �� ►t+ � �� � III►!�!��li �! ! �!� '► I ►! ! � dil(� !!! to {� i `� �����' ►��' ,I�il���'':�. ���� AE2112� 11ePfc %Tjow 1, R Q B �r. , � � !!I �, �,lll�l � ► - F ,�!l�I���t. <If(II� ►I��I►IGID! ..�I(f!(!(�Ilfl �. A W4111 C,12'714 Ce ��i%fli� ✓c�G15 %s',���c' Lc't-rt L/�r / ✓�I1��iZ�c /� ', \ORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN,IO,N 197_ —t �7 PLANNING Di S 1 GTITLE= 7 EXHIBIT =_, SCALE: E r, r., SCHLOSSFR FORGE COMPANY 11711 ARROW ROUTE krJ CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNfA 91730 1714) 987-4760 February 4, 1987 r. City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga,;CA 91730 ATTENTION; Planni;ig Commission We have gone through .our preliminary review and hope to have our "Partial Submittal" ready by,February 11, 1987. We are requesting approval for construction of two additional manufacturing buildings. One of the buildings will house our new heat treating facility. The other will house another of our manuf?�t~ing facilities. Vie are requesting a "variance" for the'''total number of parking spaces that the city requires. At this time,, we have 154 existing parking spaces. At any one time, we don't have more than 146 people working on premises. On our swing shift, we have 60 working, and on our - graveyard shift, we have only 11 working. The total number of employees required to run our two new operations will be 8 people per shift. We are, At this time, planning to add 70 spaces, which would give us a total of 234 spaces. We don't feel that we would be likely to have more than 200 vehicles on our property at any one time.. Your consideration and approval of this variance would be deeply appreciated. Sincerely yours, Albert W. Holguin, Jr. Sr. Vice President AWH:cm �o I _ SCH OSSER FORGE COMPANY 11711 ARROW ROUTE CUCAMOM'GA, CALIFORNIA 91730 171-41987-4760 February 26, 1987 CITY OF R�ttiCHO CUCAMONGA " .�_.,,,, P. J. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91734 ATTENTION: Dan Coleman - Senior Planner k';1 PLANNING DIVISION All SUBJECT: Variance 87 -04 r Dear Ms. Coleman: After review of your letter, dated February 20, 1987, we would like to submit an addendum to our Variance 87 --04. Ire the above referenced letter, Section I.B.1, you state that the Industrial Specific Plan requires trees for every three parking stalls for shading purposes_ At this time, we do not ' ave our parking lot designed with this require - ment. Wr,,wouM like to keep the new parking lot design the same a's our existing clne, for the continuity of the site and for the convenience of our employees, The addition of the trees for shading purposes will just make the walk from our employees' vehicles to the work areas much farther. Enclosed is a copy of our landscaping plan for the new addi- tions. We currently have a 5' hedge blocking our parking . lot from view of Arrow Highway traffic. We intend to extend this hedge to block the traffic's view on Arrow Highway from our new parkiiig lot. Your letter further references Section I.B.2, rcquiring.trec to be planted alongside structures to soften the buildings' appearance at a rate of one tree for every 30 linear foot of building dimension. Our building #S, will be land- - scaped to the north and east. To the south and west will be a concrete slab that our forklifts will need for access into, out of, and from one building to the next. Our Building #4 will have a concrete slab on all four sides for forklift accessibility as well. Also, Building #4 is well away from the street and the "softening" of the exterior by trees would hardly be noticeable. We are making every effort to comply with the Industrial Specific Plan; but, as you can see, these two items are not feasible for our application. We appreciate your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Albert W. Holguin, r. Sr. Vice President J, RESOLUTION NO. x: A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION Y APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW,, NO. 87 -09 LOCATED AT THE SOiITHWEST CORNER OF ARROW RAi`TE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE IN IKK" MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT - APN: 229 - 112 -17, 18. 1 WHEREAS, on the 15th day of April, 1987, a complete application was filed by Schlosser Forge Company for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the ?7th day of May, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meetinu'.ia consider the above - described project. ` NOW, THEREFOaE// the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met;. 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan., and the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is a, located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together vi�th the conditions applicable thereto, will not be cetrimental to the public health, safety, or welfaj�e, or materially injurious to properties or imp0ovements in the - vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not .reate adverse impacts on the environmen an at a Negative Declaration is is;Ued on May 27, 1987. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 87 -09 is approved subjt-n- -:c to the follow—in-9—c-o—Rritions and attached Standard Conditions: �4 PLANNING COtiMISSIOk itESOLUTION NO. DR 87 -09 - SC19LOSSER FORGE May 27, 1987 Page 2 Engineering Division: S. Overhead Utilities: a. Arrow Route - The existing overhead,, utilities (telecommunications and' electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded including all guy poles, from the first pole on the east side of Rochester Avenue to the first pole offsite west of the project boundary, including the portion presently 0veloped, -prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future d�, sl opment as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is feasible bec,use the property is undeveloped. b. Rochester Avenue - The existing overhead'., utilities (telecommunication) _9n the project side of Rochester Avenue'shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the north side) of Arrow Route to the first pole offsite south of the project boundary, prior to public lmprovemr;ro acceF ancv or occupancy, whichever occurs first: In addition, an in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical) on the opposite side ut Rochester Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one -half the d,rference between undargrou0ing the telecommunication and the electrical from the center of Arrow Route to the south property boundary. 2. Notice of intention to form and /or join the lighting and landscaping district shall be filed with the City Council prior -to issuance of building permits. 3. A recorded drainage acceptance agreement for drainage from Arrow 'Route shall be required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to Wilding permit issuance. A4 -1.3 jJ dh LA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 87-09 SCHLOSSER FORGE May 27, 1987 Page 3 4. The onsite drainage system that. accepts drainage from Arrow Route shall be designed so that the on- site buildings are protected from a QI00. S. Flood protection measures shall be provided to protect the buildings from flood flows along Rochester Avenue as justified D,v a Final Flood Repor * -as approved by the City Enginwmr. Planning Division :` I. The fiood.fscreen wail south of the driveway along Rochester Avenue shall be moved back behind the 45- foot landscape setback area, as measured from 4urb. Undulating mounding with special landscape titatment shall be provided. The final design of the streetscape shall be subject to further Committee review prior to issuance o€ permit. 2. Landscaping within the strelr:tscapes shall include evergree- trees of sufficient density to screen the east elevation of Building 4 and the loading area at the west and of Building 5 as well as any future manufacturing or warehouse buildings. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Wf-. Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller„ Deputy Secretary of the Planr-Ing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: 00WISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: A4-g4 C� a U Iti 7 O d .°•e 4 ��C Ly� j .e e" ypc ql 4 pV °Y wug .�iN *°- e�'�° •T,u oL�L`na P a N G E Y. `o � o -;W., GNU 4,c Y.e `oa w .LY It 8�? YWpv�v�uy 40 ^O °,4�u bw� ��ygy M. <i all CYCVY QY� _ V ir..�V > gwYC w cm- J a w O L O « RE J 4 14 Zfs i 1 � � � L Y.oE'r, w�V°NNty G ZZ.- 6' p N r�Y5CNZ« ,i' aa pA " w $ SA .^O 2.2 a« 6 'r ql yiM P . s .YUOo.i Ex- > L O� °o 'y i 2.I 1-9 o ` r Y - =« ■P> \ l. b d Y C •COwPGU' N � w O « i C CNax'p ~ ■y A O ` V 'M „. - -K �.. k . $Y •Y yy Y V V 00 L. C C M YY6 2~ 2 Y� C O L M OC K w y C O+ 1l Y N m a: CI �t o 3 8 0 o � 2 L V o< A -15 0 O =s LA e" ypc � P It 8�? N Mu > w cm- J a w O L O « RE J 4 14 A -15 0 O =s LA r�! I 4i rl r` F- LLI O C 11 2 6 N a cc =tYi a^N,�4 NL°fA itlE4? MF liL° QsYkL s°$3 $;= c o oc a $$ ECM � €+ • y�j Y.� + Y N° YC�r� •r Z C CCy «6� °PVC =YS •�6 CNV'Y+ VI «N N Ip a «yp� JN y•--,a i$a$ A.J. � QEuG «� e Y•+yY -y �NNny�NN� ya� ` yON aj. t4b55 : Qv �- yCY 'p'R kiz °,FPM T.L. +;n V N�LppB MY iQO�VVT ^�p6L+ s 4�°iT • a+ p v N "� N pGGpM O.b .G � eepp T -. A Q N r �j �' Y� V • H. � �y O Q Y V Iva iW L �C �r iN Nt tIMO• W�.�.4 �.0 <YI�AY� N��. iS !4 lV w'c Yj�� Y U 1$o$ °$ br w�C. $ ova �e.`„ C�NY��4s 6��s. LOCYj L� a a� JFA■ LJ gYoN �OY�•^' Y rLN $ wl� Dr CCam+ M 0 �Y gi G Mut ��.4Hw(C Np�9pY •p1� r «Y �_ � + a 6S ��y •`� � N� f19 C� #MCy� � >Ay � °L �b oc AW M� —i. "T'O Yn rL.w co cLg ►sou S> CA �GV J. CCC ISIR pO yyy �� ^wf—N L IL R L y S LG �+�"' Yu" V7° i� «.Lady C�Y9 q N OyyE Y^ } y0.° Lv ac. N=•„� $n�fS Q�4 ..r �� n -.°_NL ��O1 GY +.��� YYCa.pD C�6Ntl^ �T�E L� _ +TO•,.�0 �$ �.' "7;€ °Ip .Yi.L I si+Y4 L� +NV • 3 °N„. a° cc °ne �V?�. is N � „. g'o «.ce a$$� �Y�' my ...'+ 3 v..�'i� T►'S vca A` cyp + V woLL co <h'sn —wa HO -N?ii LV »�1.�v u.L aw+i«� oar �+ p °coo rL-z cs .°luv !4 lV v. �I O 2 Qj Qj LU W Cl. Ylr nni C)O ,p OC Gam_ 9. 900 + 'Al .yNt++Z, L4pi �YY O p � AL ►i O� Y`} L i1Ny{ y? �>5... ry. C Cp y y C Y O CY�C -or °fS +N _y It 41'Cn ^EY O'`it ONN YS Ypu.kET$� %.9 L EG YN p uylp'VM v Sc T Y ki > NY YGGUS Yj�n+ yyC�y yi�„•,h, + r' NYC`.m AI vvL 4�VN 'YY•a ^NY4p.`.uY� Vpfila CMC p�11 w�i c.YG L9 L vpw «- 4w `u! °OM Q9.� GR* fiY 4 bN'nr O LL YT �1V CC • NC `O VVI4 6CZ .0 gg�f G Ann L 1�11 qq µ Y L I�yI pM =y�y Y M 04n.p Yty.» `.p N� tiY D. 45:87 D 0T0`�q t °uo�N �M1 ++-o uNEYE�y��q'7^' " e�✓ N�Ai ACt`o'yt.L cw ,,,.4r� i.�o� .•nom �i r.. ty gSN •1NOV 1xm 9% N 5ii2$ of NN; +$ N 6 Y �u qT.��Q Y9ZW •. 'M .N 06 tt iM w .= n[y$aC Ag1 At r i.Q` GG G C d O GGG as yl ayl 4 BE 4 t: 9-08€` TV 8t moW;,. Wx p... � �. C CL' p• {�. C.•� Y K pM p � }Dp1.Y b A9yY •" wp L Y� Yr t Yay!p� �Cpr 04. 9VL� + �@ u9 LvI Yn+ �� O1Ep <Xp.L q st yYx.�YU.L i —n., .Y EYY. �Y V 9M . OYD N C^ OY'\ fit` OL • C'YD��C�E =i .5t6• pN i,.I Y6po.G}� hD L•.1— P¢ �CQj`p�Rp wl N D N py� a IO 4 a � ON by 'c�jD p " �°•A LE> S aD^ "i nM <o ~r ytC 6VMAL Ci D4d9 �.�4C � L�� N�7 L7 '">. '�'LGQ ?w �Y"4y•� Dl —�C 4iI.rY �_ Gy 1Vc <L1 < 99 rDV°i�� LOL J �l U nn A li ^�{ V 0 z U W Q Q' C26 El r/ Ei GVd •y Q� OO�d YF� o�Q4C9$�{ V^0'd St �;NV y ^.^ ` b l•' qvµ Nor G p a1-0. C =G y Y' gCG> Ga 6E yNY 4.¢O. aL.GW N L�N 1V"C� •+L r yT G Z� r 01009 � O Lw d � 111 w0. p ^O� �L CC9W Vg. Ur. q 7 V bVU yLp �o�o° 6cd Nu u' duet qj doh =°wa'o 'd agYE IIom` n »y 01odt3 �C�og 7siu, VSiG.�iq °� eI ;I � 1 40w +L 3C.., min '� SCd tUUL LGyy G- b �UL. $Ea�L. C ^El. �Lfd FQ "J U.OT °A1L.LOY i OC =NU `aLivdY YroN W, GC1q��� a 9, n■■p�pO O N y . .^.. cL 'e 22 qnp.1^ M qjY� �i «w1i1c � ma ay 1[Lt •+•1 o1 �0Y O�YA� O. O SCI G �.`�Oa 4T. jjy��1 -x dy w :Rh4 NiCp NC wL > qY� w «� �01.UG q0 G nF NA T y G 9'a N V A FEW r. °na o. vt N' n uu u b 6a I", w :Rh4 NiCp NC wL > qY� w «� �01.UG q0 G nF NA OOq N V A I O X01 tT =V y CYV 'Y 9 6 b 6a fLN «N y=S y^ dLC MAN °.. YLa•J y9 IOD yy L y ^y .4. + 1 , N U 29 �Y6 NN `$emu 6a Ta x. >.Vq Cq11�1LyyO L Oyyil1 �.. • 4 vy qM NN �Y.Y ZZZL V w G c^ci e> dd n u Y wn tl E O cMgp x'1.0, yt_�1 au N^ YD a CNdi ca °wo '%.tizd � $ v =s < . '_ v � � AwA °.d c � � � y c �,�T3� u d �.w.- .�•0' _ YLd w� Z6 w.d = •+ °e a w9•V1q 4i�.— ¢ VOq� u Y €drO CIi O r� Nob OC A��O Or-yV uw Cr a1o=. Nato W wa Nc d1 � w .Ti1 u .. L CC HLUUw .� ev E y v9$ Vir rn O �� tutor 9UOG NN T Mi NPTC ^ LqC GC G6® CIYN° �O LE= ►�Uu 1E mK Pit -t�' a F� R _i @ O d C >YO iisl �&I SyNu EEq �Y�3 h N V` An 9� � Y iXX1.q 1YG y °.NC9C OIYYp90 a» =E �'� N Ey4 ig Y vCC C Yy La C p�r goa`� AIL �TG �YNUY ° Y ne17i . L� c cow KY pl6 wY N 6nj � W ^'a ate' cy� Lwq r.. Y v Z 4�ii �.� q Y • 93�L.� Y+°L 4�1n yW �-Css �c1E� �YM66 E L° 9 v _e 9CN� gaol` DYCEIY��V[�''� V C F Z e � o a » 5 yj ., 24 •x1j. `� gg Jh a N a i-5 �✓ U 2 M m w jp a 2m N'� C� N NLN ��ip��.L Y� ^� p 6 ^Y2 �Nr 4p•.�lg Y °•�° Yp p� i O� g•'. R 1.9� L �CC N� Y � y r h~ Y M $:: YY �� y o� C m N LC��.Y Cpp 3 � roroil �CPW L CC!q^Y9 OC pn� § °� N O r0 rr y '9 A >f V LLY. ° gj 4Y9� � Y H 9 y �Yi l C •.i DEW pyO GO . 1nyy Cp i JLiLyNwM $ OPT ■r WNG9TOsL WViI I6 44.. aG�O= 4u Y�°1 tl0 Nt1 4YY1Y ta! S q G a F� R _i @ O d C �&I SyNu EEq �Y�3 h N V` An 9� 4A L C c• N. p 91^w a» Ey4 ig Y vCC C Yy La C p�r goa`� AIL �TG �YNUY ° Y ne17i . L� c cow KY pl6 wY N 6nj � 11 �&I � �Y�3 h i f. P a» ll LgS goa`� AIL �TG W �p�.:g �-Css �c1E� �YM66 E L° 9 v _e 9CN� gaol` DYCEIY��V[�''� V C e � o a » 5 yj ., 24 •x1j. `� gg Jh NI N a i-5 U 2 M m w �1O M 2m N'� C� App ^y$g• NLN ��ip��.L 6 ^Y2 �Nr � � �A �_a C«e O j9L �`'E $:: YY � zd �_�■ 3 .qp EgaVV &g ar r0 99 p. V LLY. ° CO w6C�yV 4Y9� 1Y1Y?'0. «c� C 1��G aN JLiLyNwM CYwo OPT ■r WNG9TOsL WViI I6 44.. aG�O= 4u Y�°1 tl0 Nt1 4YY1Y S q G 7 11 ` a C �dg°z_.y� Y9..N - L _M Ui L $ t�i..p+. '� 'G.N � � _ € ° wo 0.5 x Bobi T. �. i'". �. L.°-. .l gab °r C ,Y,;�•n �� ��± � ua �»nayyb � L, aN 'f C. rtu VyO �9 M y Yy�O1N ICN Uu rfrW LP + Y In g M O L yL 1 AV µu VY pNL.0 O WN UOpY fCM }> > �{dy 9. ~. CC cpp ..C.• L NLI `� � s S> 15 _.6 L VY� � [• L W L V xY C6y w �L�¢{r Yp LP.� - .P�M Y�� a 4�y UL pp �€ pp q Oµ• LU A VS -0 yY L OCc O ap L r� L 0^ N 9 L U (c/ WA �I p O l�LyT(�F LN `L 0^ Y.O. ^� f L L •�O?C E i r. W .o_V y N 4-6 NS. se �rw` W a u� g m.L.. '�' N Y e� iii r�u.q Ke.'p�,. i a dpi c E..$r..T Y yryyeY'.1 A 3i N pr � a NO�aSiW >11F �i !V 6�.C• 4YM��1yYy �� VO !W * �4 � F.�YW CO.� U 2 c 0 € _ s 8 � •O v N 3 Y r. J 1�VV_ �S 'm 10r r W tJ W , 1 jq-AO Y •�1u c 4 qv sy a�; 4� Aga 010 9 O= W L -�O TS�i•L O� q Lr VNt^ �.. O�Mfl N U ' VpyLfwiµ 9 L € �TYY1r n Li �'••1 �I4 � CON GMY ✓r Or � C`E A � 4r p � L. �.� V •. may+. �� it sv� NU4� s� w01G re cO c u« Y E S2 -E-. p. N UT Aga �gL -,moo ice. wn.G �•m C 2awn.� gpu�ytY.rs u r ;My it L r W w� Ye a ZZ Y O� O W L NVL N» r 0 O E 4 s O W �■■jO aN Cy S c 0 € _ s 8 � •O v N 3 Y r. J 1�VV_ �S 'm 10r r W tJ W , 1 jq-AO a •�1u c 4 qv sy a�; 4� Aga 010 9 O= W L -�O TS�i•L O� q Lr VNt^ �.. O�Mfl N U ' VpyLfwiµ 9 L € �TYY1r n Li �'••1 __ nW� �9VG� YCY ✓r Or 4 C`E A � 4r � Vyy GO! ]py� O �W_alUr �� it s� w01G re cO Vz C L •91 �C r Y -s x- S2 -E-. p. N $o Aga �gL -,moo ice. wn.G Ma.0 2awn.� gpu�ytY.rs u r YY1L L q N L r W J y G V c ZZ O� O N Y Aq.Al V• Low P 7Y .'off • Y Z ° a� s a'. CS Q. �N Y_ p � 4 Oy 6CY y p r0 1 y y■ V� W Y V^ I Y tl „� `V Bi C a. N 'y V C L v • 14y f0.0 iYd� CN ►N O Ly y Y P2 n 9 V C xQ \ .:L C C w eN -a a jo OY Yaci' M~ .i�•f + N T A v �« at COO +4� Y.p YVYYY^ p ;pa V Le•d ppL ° H � �N � � °i �p 4 S O c 0 a+ •S 4 y d' w. MW Y � C. Y ° CNiy_ Y p CY e„Y„� aawV S VY� rs4. �+ °y VN.0 L1ra °Y° C'YL YT qCa Y OC �L9C wL0• L LGC C YO '� N d+, Dr'O �aa A `OJ L'� �ar: 4p Y.Y� r V _9. S- ay Yw NMy°I Q. YY E `. y �2� 4 vii HuYi tW D� t1r' WN.�N r� O id H� N 6SV:7 1•f iSV.. T FMC IA d Aq.Al fi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT CgCAA `P Z DATE: May 27, 1987 > TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Barrye R. Hanson,, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Terra Vista Planned Community Street Improvement Iaplementation BACKGROUNvi- On April 8, 1987, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract 13275, wMch is located at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street (rpfer to Exhibit "A"). The Developer objected to the Engineering Division condition requiring the improvement of Milliken Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Baseline Road. The Commission decided based upon the information available at the meeting that the condition was appropriate, but did request that additional information be provided at a future meeting, which is the reason for this report. a The Developer did submit an appeal of the condition, to the City t ounqil; however, he has since withdrawn that appeal. DISCUSSION Staff imposed the Milliken improvement condition for the following reasons: 1. Staff had understood the Council to have given direction that it was prefered that the longest segments of streets as possible be constructed at one time to provide smoother traffic flow and reduce future public ir.,convience 4ue to piece meal construct-ion. 2. The Council hk I designated the construction of Milliken Avenue as one of the highest priorities within the City to releave congestion on Haven Avenue. 3. Several projects had been submitted by the Developer that were either adjacent to or would take access from Miliken Avenue (directly or indirectly). Those projets are shown on Exhibit "A". 4. The same land owner owns all the property adjacent to Milliken Avenue; therefore, the Developer was not being required to improve someone else's property. L ITEM N I Staff Report May 27, 1937 Page 2 r, In order to redn.e future miUlpderstandings between the Developer and the City, staff jeveloped the ,street Impro%ement Implementation Policy containe(,on�.cxh,4'bit "B ". S dilf has met with the Developer and he is in agreement wfth the policy, except that he did regiest that it also be epplied to adjacent - developments. Staff assured hint that it would be to the extent possible. x There are three basic components'to the policy: 1k'= A. Streets shall be constructed full width to reduce future distruption to traffic flow. B. Two means of access shall be ?rovided to all projects for emergency vehicles „and general traffic, use. C. Projects located ia .thin designated areas shall construct { specified segments of major streets. Staff feels thzt the development and implementation of the policy will reduce conflicts between the Developer and the City, provide optimum traffic circulation within Terra Vista, and enhance the image of Terra vista as a Planned Community. Respectfully submitted= eJGU�t AO, l� r �✓ Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH :jh Attachments: Exhibit "A ": Project Status Exhibit "B ": Implementation Policy TERRA VISTA. PLANNED COMMUNXTY PRWEET AND STREET STATUS N XWO Isms • in it Ui z qi PROJECT No. TT 1 3276 Pre iminary Completeness TRC PC Recorded Finaled LEGEND: + PROJECT STATUS In Process ® P C Approved ® Recorded ' Finaled STREET STATUS am= xistNg Pavement M Required for this Project !, .*ibkco- Full waWA cG,w k V, 00avitrl1 wte�rsti`. r @i st roa+d6 3, E/� - 2G `p�N�u��H� w[fHIH a40� rr8lt�" a� tvd04+ } St. _ ,xi 5/1/87 CITY OF RANCRU CUCAMOAGA - ENGINEERING DIVISION TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY ,SHEET INPROVIEWIT 114PLOOTATION POLICY Projects within Terra Vista shall be reWred to construct street improvements as follows: A. Streets adjacent to projects shall t,%P. constructed 'full width to include curb on the opposite sides. B. Streets shall be extended (full width) off-site far enough to provide two means of access. C. Projects within the individual Development Areas shown on the map below shall construct the specific street segments designated as follows: AREA STREET SEGMENT I Foothill Haven to Spruce and Haven - Foothill to Town Center 2, Foothill Haven to Milliken 3 FoothIll Haven to Rochester 4 Rochester.'-Foothill to Poplar 5 Rochester Foothill to Church 6 Rochester Church to Base-Line 7 Base Lirj± - Milliken to,Rochester 8 Base Line - Milliken to Mountain View 9 Same as adjacent area dependinq upon where access is taken. 10 Milliken - Foothill to Base Line 11 Spruce - Foothill to Elm 12 Most of this area is already conditioned or developed. 13 Haven - Church to Base Line NOTE: Projects that cross area boundaries (at corners in particular) shall construct all segments required for each affected area. LEGEND -Area boundary i Area number Ab,of -& ti t "'i - CITY OF RANCHO Ci.ICAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 27, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the PTannlog Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: nan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: BILLBOARD REMOVAL PROGRAM GL,t s1M7gV Fi I, ABSTRACT On April 22, 1987, the Plannin }ommission directed . staff—to prepare a condemnation program fi billboard ranoval. St&'f is seeking a recommendation from the Commission to the City Council to proceed with a phased program of billboard removal, starting in Fiscal 87188. II. BACKGROUND: In 1979, the City Council adopted a comp,,.nensive Sign Or inance w ich required the amortization of advertising structures thereinafter referred to as billboards). Staff has comp, yed a. survey of existing on- premise and off.- premise billboard signs within the City of Rancho Cucamonga (see attached). There are a total of 30 billboards within the City, 25 of which are located on Foothill Boulevard. In addition, the City Attorney has reviewed the enforcement of the City's Sign Ordinance regulations regarding billboards. The City Attorney has concluded that the majorit of the Sign Ordinance regulations are inconsistent with' the regV° ments of state law in their application to off- premise billLt —ods (the exception being the removal of billboards in_ agricultural and residential zones). The result of slate law is that all off - premise billboards must be treated in the same manner as with the acquisition of rea p- operty. Therefore, the City of Rancho Cucamonga would be required to go through condemnation proceedings to remove billboards which is a costly and time- consuming process. It would cost approximately $10,000 per billboard, plus legal costs„ to condemn a billboard and have it removed. III. ANALYSIS: Staff's survey of billboards indicates that there are our categories of signs: 1. Billboards located at a "major intersection or gateway (7 billboards). ITEM 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Billboard Removal Program {, May 27, 1987 Rage 2 ?. Billboards located on developed land that is not I(kely to be redeveloped in a manner -that would cause thd- removal of the f billboard (1 billboard), . 3. Billboards located on developed; land that is likely- to be redeveloped causing the remz7ai of the billboard (5 billboards). 4. Billboards on vacant land that will be removed when development occurs (17 billboards). Staff will present a slide show of each billboard in the various , categories. About one -half of the billboards are located on vacant '. land on Foothill. Boulevard oG. Naven Avenue. Staff would recommend that these be given lowest priority frr removal because the potential is high for removal when development occurs which would not require the ,expenditure of public funds. The next lowest priority' for removal would be billboard signs on marginally developed sites where redevelopment potential is high. For example, the Victory Chapel site (next door to the Cowgirl) will most likely be demolished some day as land values rise and the pressure to develop to its "highest and best use" results in redevelopment of the site. The second most important priority for removal should be billboards wnict are located on sites that have been ful,y developed where redevelopment is unlikely or many years away. The billboard located in the Perry`s Market parking l on Foothill adjacent to the Woolworti's Garden Center is an example of this category of sign. Because tle potential for redevel inent is low, the City should pursue condemnation. TI" top priorill for removal should be those sgns located at major :.,�rsections �,d gateways. Their visual prominence at heavily traveled intersections or at a key entrance to the city warrant their ;expeditious removal. These signs may be located on vacant land, such as the southeast corner of Foothill and Vineyard or developed land such as the northwest corner of foothill and Archibald. The only billboard located at a gateway is adjacent to the Red Hill Cafe at Foothill and "Grove. III. RECOiMiENDATION: Staff is requesting a recommendation from the Planning ommi ssion to the City Council to Proceed with a phased program for billboard condemnation, beginning with sign.: at major intersections and gateways, as part of the Fiscal 1987 "88; budget and work program. PLANNING ON laF REPORT Billboard Re yal "Pr -agram May 27 1987. Page 3 i t1 Res, ni ly ed,, lrad eal er ity P nner '^ BB:dC•vc Attachments F.%hibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" List of Billboards LL c it 72 TI— SE) . N J4 -11�1 lycr A&IM= 77tH MY-1— 3WAV iy LO O. •yry �, .GSA s a�'v' a!7r �,'��, ,yam i ✓ tl tart u�� TI w to w � � � K F° �_ • i ' s s _ Tl�i'� �-" —',-'— F- 31i�i4!ttd�-3ifQ114 By ^ — _ ° a a u v a I \ Q o 4 '% uj Cd co co G) F 1` to m F U '1 •- r * . -. -... 3 •�a .. �� ji31 Y �' Co �SL° ... y. �....�� ..., . ..� ♦i.�. � o'er �' �aN SIP WW Od tt Ilk I YJ I (ED �, 9a s 4i u `s; al ul Yh i � •".i N^ �- Y a II \ i yr •�;'�'4f'f, •� � J � 'r Y ryt ei.r- � � li 1 I. �; I ca Ul N 1 a a m 1 o "rci 3 lip Zi Ps zz co Q: ! }t�iGBQ• o sn N' is•iif +1 n alv. Lifhas.s�y 1 c, 6YptkF `T P i Y m v4 * .Sri _ - r'�,,�' . «�r'� ', �r` � ��,••.vS'�lc -. .99;;.� Yss�*r+ L"'"'� i� J. •.i•�(�O ��, �'- p/t.A /IY.7ll%� .._ �� y�� Y Q•}P�}i'��d .,� •- .` � a 1 rep � i`.' i . �.. .... .-.. �...+.����. § o u mss{ 001 y•t - F o. m �. /J i1 a 9p i � N m a1 MR N j C J ©° z W.. t od r g:6. C� �u hU aD -- Ue C� V T v': pip I c Q ac c ci ix� cr k ty W r Cd ca Vb J� �a avoly ARlNtSf13J S._ ! low � �o____ -Si' — . ..:+.mss•. — cc yob' _ .oi. Cd "o • � i61 'IBS. cci a, • y, }` LL PAZ in 43 0 t <Cori (3) It Tt 1. c) q e\1 S7— 77 -C s 0: If 31 Lj Aft - �. Ar ii� " .�, ^,_`' -. • .tr�a�riC a " ; j fie c „ I .. ' X119 ' {•^ �.'. l�I I1�'t .�fO.�. q- 7 1 4 4SS/ +.A-C h c L23 AC ••77 �I § _ �Z p � !� f •3 Q. �.! `EIli Ya 9AC 'fl Frr. 3 �- PM 4 ' 3.47AC PN f .�'� .x � .L r''- -•'. �{� i ; �' t )� t met -. v � 'r�!', .,#'26. AC Ai f t•.�Y� fy .� ��.Y. h+�.j� � • fir." !L{ �� A ..�f�. � �•'^ � � .. � H •..�ii�'F''�` dL c S ..ay 7 -'�.. •dfi. '2•.. �i:s -. ' .�c•�.rY �, •� ;�ci � ! r rte.+' �; _ rr s i { • r� i ".'E+ � �•,it�,. ; �' _tT,,,� .''� 17L't=l� �,1u• ,�. � t��� e� is �+ ,.1,• -�< �s _s r � � 7 •_ w � M . i� c�c i + ..y. � � ' }, � 4 S � f .'r.yR _ sx.� ,rt a • rtt •�` Lr ;^� s" •r f� S � .'i � {,Y• y � � t`r. 4 .7,r :•��.t �, 4�•_ mss. \•-Y1 ,.� �", r >.. � � .. � �..,�y `•�+fr �' . JOGG •� r SL `",p a+° iM i gna ,, w J is _ " j___ r� 'r }; a . : n-•C +'l' °'9 ''1 Hc-pw].,: 6'•-*,-;-z ai S ,L r s�-'f � •s tn. i+_.' �` :. ^ X15 =: 7.'�" �+; 2 NA' ,,tky{ r i4fi7 f ,t 4 •• .~ Or R ii c@c • O ggam• @� n lo 'ke ,y � ji a gC i �C� r'%!'i' LSD- af•FDA s9w � CHIC 49[ -9C 6> i•a c tcyV f N.. Y U fH s CD Cd WO t ' ` ( i N � n ✓f �• moo• , l 1 an C M 4 ¢e� LOX �, 7 0 C } _ : ^� �rrk�'�"` �� . sj - ++.�+''.. `'tax � _"�, •lz'•`t _ co al .a � H —00 O e no F a yy lmw I. I -- + tL N. cx co te- IL cu E C\Jio CL Q N c m co rs LH, cf lmw I. I -- + tL N. cx co � 'R�wA/•1 � R � Q�` '("fie : 3 6 1fl _ . �i pO •. i•�� . ^ ��� �� sue- Na a� Na Na Q L � �, �•'. i Fft d.iM, G "Z •'� it,'. + a I f °j 'V'm 1 ace k y. 1 M dye_ � a `ri t_ •Viii f� .. 1 � � �7.: �� .t� �T fk"•s g y 4 .•�y[�y1? a n� ,,� �'�I „? }` 1 ����J77%%% rY• » ^•�uW#i `.yq. t$ °* • � � � mss, ��? - �....! �° ►` � 's ~may' _ >•� .,..t:c..a+�o `} i �t ti i '•+13ii�t +rr ?�� r°_c�.'., �' ' +.JELaa ,4•s ,•,: _ � f rt {:!r r.� � `„� • .. ,,� •rangy ` � i � qK p V C ' a M✓t�.�� "r�"'~ ± r �'. "k R "..' .� ..y �f..- .t �n v h .. J'Y `� L s Its V, 3S'tff M� 3fyAAV td31N3? N ;Y �a Um e �$v w O n b py ... i 4( N R 3 N tom' -. A to Y bu _;a uO t ;a - .•� a mss' err. '•'�, C p5,,. cq 4 t w LD • ' ,� � m', _ a �+q Q�cn _ va to N t0 N NMI cl v J ti; t Lm f a Lt tp • S � � _ � .0.c 'b a: S A �, m _ y 5,A; 614 3, '`. '' 4 Af. �'tiw n Q` r 229' - 1 �� _ . �_To�� Veils• At�� • • ;`- r�z AC WI, g 7- -300' , ji- 1f✓d f. f ., NW '�L.• ---e' •`r lO =tT -85 �� �!a.SiiBSS�S /ifC$i • 21 �� &7 195ESS !- BidCkBLat �J a ..` - j BP?41f ��'��.POi�jB. -0 - - , . 'hers .$l�own'rr Ciro%. .. g 5 04 Ber,70.d,� GOW& :,xXXXX X XX X XXxXxXXx x X X XXX,t xxx x x E Mri 2`XXX xx X xX X XX X ��XH X X xX cnxxxXxx �x x xx P is ?�XXXxX X x XXXX X 7[ Xx X x n X X A y n a § tl' w Y a � a S n X X X X X 4 X a A X X X X npil n XX X X xx X;" XX X X X ACHY X X X X X M A Y ♦Y • n 3 p I.e • !� p OY yOiy'Y . Y \y Y C�dww X X wQ�se x iif q x 7We X X X X sA M A ^ p O a U nXXX E XXx ae\ w n X x x y. e UInXX eecnxxX xx G e3wnxxx XXx FeF2axxx Q XXxf[[ w• V a. X X X Y s7u X X a i Ln 1 F. C o 9 �Qy }T�+ i O Q"� Nam m.Ut U Aw FFFCC CCF. w 57�it1,0 x wtY L,3 M}. bIL M.4 ii pp(�. i.. YY �Y YNNNII�t�Twpy ZZ NN WEit Oat 1d WCir7.Y ^C Y. pXXXYUUUXX Gl XCJ XXX(JY xl 0. [2 V'J.L Om S e v C Vw Lw t Z w m1X,1C6G oi x? X v 33613 W 0: Q 4 — tai F uGtiCo waFMI.WEMCGOK C�Cw L:wai .`is NF �Li 47 ��2 ¢s\\ .li \wF( -.F hO�a00wwOa s ±a - .rcac.wwa�ss� s s• XXUNS S'=.YY =2S rXT wmw w:u 3,S 3CA 33 ZSM.:.S•}.XdNFf:YXY X:;XSC•lY nU 5 g am A4;II y.ii +:7.1 Qc amcoceCaw�re ra mmm��c;3a MA7My�ww333+ie.Q.4.- At"d'aII. .... 23.. .. ii�iiiJii 333 + .3 J.N NNJ ^3.i .i .7 ssx= m f FFI- 'f�FFF� -F FFt+ FFMF�F= SSF"� as c:c a�aou�Fi`fi�FFF� ? u UL`t Jf .77aP. :^L: V3t� • +�..{� UI'if t7. CC 3.. n 7:Z4e1ffi �ZZ. ^.222a'i .• \Gr r � 14.�..yi ..F..nrA .aRrn IIa MN17l j. YxC Y n••• ..rN �iN+C ^C? w INNNNC D3 L^.. 11 f7 Ci '7 ^!.. \ ^Ee= O.. v;R Tfn L \CaO -NM r hl oAC\ : .f o N tiv w.,..r..NNNNNNNNNmPiPiII3C^..- a E #/' /�'t it ; t"id, a ti, n cr ilf 17 (A U4 W, OV C 30, —00 to to on gs ' rp -0, to is a Z — tn "0 3, a' 1 06, 1, P-M a — f, a, to &I C rt En to ts us C. lb to 9 41 On im m w Ono a An al V, tA 0 0 ID aq- M IE cl 1A to IA x 0 x x x 0 x x tx Ix x x X0 0 x -Tt 'n 'n C7 a n ei ' ;'8 ' 0 a a tx IV Im =1 T I -, - a 11 x -, 01 Z 'I - 1. ::r La 0 rt I- tft A a -4. .1 In M 0. a IA C: tA Ln ta #A f 0 C6 Im :2 TD tA m IQ tx Ir. 1:3 c 36 rT F —n Tj cr 'A 2 (D so m 0 m n -1 =r CL CL 7r AA x x x x x x 1� 0 1 X X XIX ix X 1% x x K,.m X X 0 0 X, X 0 X� IQ 0 0 0 X IQ 10 F R 10 77 77,5777 � f TW It 'Rh cc 0.,n rip Wm 'g.-t =,n cL ja n 00 1., im 43 tv a M W 0 CO M to 0. na W, 0 lu It r -.- a OV rtt V. rl a al z CL w n vi 0 C. ci •C rq 0 jil er 0 cu m t4 $A 3 cc. w to 0 0. 1L rot 'It r RIX tr z 3 pq tA it 0 C? So 01 m tA C' C ID z fD rt 0 rp 09 to b4 >C O x x CD G P Xjx x X x X Ix x 0 x x x x x x X 0 C. 0. CL U3 tr v M 'A CL 0 'A fA ri -,4 CL pz 0. IM z CL 0 F Im !0 21 cr R o;— CL 0 IA z 0 Is M cr lb -0 !a PA Y IA tA CL 4a 1w iu 'A O. 06 X Q. x Ln ix X 0 10 0 cl X x Ox Ix X, x x 0 00 ka 0 M M V 10 a "Y OF RA& tiQ O x N n n 0 a M to -R 3 •� w ur a p4,u- u V A ,3 n. N 3 O C1 a C-J \1 :V fL,,� \CryC AA °" ;.- fi ew A ;.6 P. W T a En n x x !'x x x t n p ex x x x .x x x x X X x X r 1 g, v° E'er We -Inn g n N A p. na" d n n -s at CL i., aa2a p' CL a "Y OF RA& tiQ O x E MIL I�r a N n n 0 a M to E MIL I�r a Wr RM {'r E CG A ' A " (7 Ica ". �.. • C Q r n o �. �� � o ro K er _Han. � r w {gym Vr A p` K$ n SY C Yb O 3 H O to N 3 to ISA 4 .y kw vN VA H i Y H uFjveN O `v IC o o a to cif u o Z Z > hw C>1 A N O O in .( one W O O O O n cc .N. fu W M 01 M Al x Ln IM > > q 0'n c ll > > Q > a <•n �'p a o Fr 00 N r m a n° 3 rim AA C, my �A � m � -.� Y CL " 1 10 C7 «uroi'� G. � ° 3 03 C 4 n - e -wono C mono G � ». �C�O � tiO7Q � , mz nm:m r li� i�m as n a,�m o nm »m S '�� ear 7 �x eix. i a ro G r _k =T _x �x a r• U .it N H i+ N �'. H y. .)i A I N H `e "� H, H. - 0� d to <Q r <� <to e � 0. r a� <s� 0 7 v3 M no 3 3 3 -C3 V » Yro SJ 7777 ro n 77:37 D go Y? Y ? q; Y »a rM M1 n M a to a s 3 M a s o. a .. t. Cn � LA = 3 9 Qa + Gt N. PO � Write � TJ� Nf V� i!e N M N N i9v V` N , t T LU ILA ro N 0 7 X. ro 7 3 3 7 oroi> 3 S s 7 Yi c w a i v Mn . Q .. V aro ^3 n o H c Q N 3 r r r O a ro '.�.� :2 i:- e0. 0 0 S0 N Q.7 7 M M N Q v a_ :�'ra �H .� . .. n Tj Y CJ H R r Z Q Z °� :ITYOF RAC n o d +° ,n. 0 4 9 «w y , ` C c A» NJ n Z Z Z z op > > > ti; ;f ie t y ;i .. 5 { z y t, I �) co ;f .. , .. FRAA7CMWIIp �,,. of •.. d ^. -i M d ... e n d Z54 cr N g r d- d m. N W -' 0 o< n F 's n d C0 F 'r1 C7A m .. W w n OM A °�'. 0 to to n N 0,AZ t, < Z o C �C "it 10> °r'O m` 33 n C'o2n0N. W- c m C G o rL N A D mo a, X m' cr m Q mo' in 0 _ n r Tna 6t N 3 rm= .n Z*m <�� Oa c' a W M h DJ n� n— o N• 'S ,�'< N G ` (A C 'lrl °'.::n, 0 2 ma *M 9: • nf;"mmc a N - e d a N nS '1 9 'J1 v y 7 6�t NS ° S n d d ,. v_ oni -V co d o n N ZT +;sdr e w 4 cocr a 3 3c., .1 0.1- N *0 a m m o . t, I �9 iW m � G it Y 3 N m C G A D -D+ v> V n 9 -e d..a vv v dN l'1 d W °'.::n, C (C 3J. i0 a p n•�� •n7� a N n 9 'J1 �: o _ ZIP n N ZT n e w 4 cocr a 3 3c., .1 0.1- n N *0 a m m o OFAm N -U -r a n N -A n _r pp A n. d_ C In in V 0. y Hd y W 'D S d N (9 n n .0 = n t�D N _ n� as m u ? c p m W � `� n g v 0 m. n 0 o � � W .. x x x cx x x X x0 0 k x bx x 0 0 . t, I �9 iW m � G it ncr£;gzor��t `� n ttmd m a n w y C1 m R Rub . Z j : p d .`` p N d. ,as n f:i. G. w�i 'p. t1O L-� �Au N YM CL& n - a rt ti d. 7 d tY' N f roC r C6 QW 7 y7F ,. 3 iiM (A Na. ab F.:''T En d d N 93 Np N 0 CLM V1' N� OOC f-4 @ N TA � ma 6{ ti w' n N rr r+ n N• N. J+- N. S. d rr t N N go M r. th v x ,X X >C Ik x X X X O X O Lnn X' x X iX X x 1X O a Xb x x do X Ix rn,� x t X X O I r n w c. n o , m ro ro ro O Z z z r s r r n h x > r v .✓ v v R 9 Y -w C C n A d F..' ft f' 'l 0 N a' rt y O .i moaD 0 N a , c 33 I ;. . r r < cr v o m " '' a N � � wR " m w -r o a .m w ]Q O C o OQ M m o y - n Il ' 'c , K �. " Y N i ' ri '.i rm � -�� i .m W tr Ctr OO 0 :5 K N pp µ! N N ut D 7.tm O S£a•R . t -r K w� O m7 G -, `• m 9 m L. a ' ' R rr ; 'f o H 5 0 t•. a. '7 t.: �. G n �n cy r 1 n . O rr C. G tv M W O rt '.w3 N 'f3 _f T ti �„' {�� �tY,,, c. 1�+. N fri rOr G n t? w Oo •• •p. w t� 2.. W 7 lv sa d tl+ fd n ty m N to to wno o.o �� tom �ti. rb =14 aw0 9n~' ,tn nrsrt r,pa nJ w to N A A !( r N tp la ry X X o X :K x o X X X x r n x x O X x x X X X X X Q x x XIN IX x N x Ik X x O �O r C fI' 'i ITY,OFr RA a s M� c TY OF 0 n�N w N ,a R a y R 3 m °o D. ° a� n o j y w L 91 oz vro h o rt nR �^ P- Q A Y i N co tl! R C7. } N L —i X O R R tA y Q 2. _1ry t 0! ,'ATM w o O rT 0 W 0 d W ! O. O R N N 3 N O' ul ' ro R R I R .'K O• r N C R art N w b N N ar M n C ry a p�p x•• µ ?L t'P a rt RJ C Z � � N x X O O xk O X n. n x 1k K x n , oO O O 0 r. X X OX IX X X XIX X x � 1 X X X x X X X O. G O jo O 1 O Pu i M� c TY OF I 0 > Iari p D. j y w L 'e h o rt q �^ P- Q A Y i N co of n tl! R C7. N L —i C1 I y 2. o O rT 0 W 0 d W ! O. O R N N N O' ul ' ro R R I R N R N N n n , a. a rt RJ C Z � � N x X Xo X n. n , x X x !k x Ix toy R 1 X X X x X X X O. G !k ,. 1 rJ d a I a ;i s� sc 5 in IL ,N M {0 r A 1~ r i r• C G. tA Y N M h n �+- N N' p .w &2 Le O 2 2 > > a > +n � t W y.W O O m a* q w r x w A O p. Igo. a 7 » t 7 C r _ r- nm-m v �m.m -- x Mf a a.. 313 2 ' gggw r c CITYOFRA y0 a VINitOilld� •1 o a •}� w w r w w w ur oo x' _i .1�1 .� O OIL tE o Q s « «a'F QQee s A �, A 7 q u W W f W W 0.3 � � 3 3 � �, 3 3 r CITYOFRA y0 a VINitOilld� •1 o a •}� w w r w w w ur oo x' _i .1�1 _i .1�1 ,4 : -2i �! {{ F . 1 i CAD CIO 1 �. cc ' � I i i`\\ ~ �Ci p 4 i FY i i.s - .td N A. 9 aVy if Ot jg Im 7 Q V to, Y M ct � N d CL CL Is K. S x c> st x n z X0 tl x x ue Ix n N CL r Di A a � q C 9 f[1 ca t a (_ e C o nn s b a m ii N:N e " m� itK. ae m. 6 h1d j`wi 7 d N�� Ii1 0. r. Q" Yq Y�° .. fKD mn �. »Rte tb cr «. �o � =. rr IA. u N'2 rC Mw w Y "A ; y �0 pw+�o " y �j gQt t na CL D"N7 7 N A N emu C » � nS ��Q. p. N V-B CCi n N � N R G N �Qy x Ik C k X X K x .Q IN x .. n x x o o AID x x a >00 x x x x 10 x '< x o x f0 IktO tk x x w Ix k E 0 b to M I p 10 10 10 3- as cI x o to x 10 it x x x c a 9a NZ A ;� YtNil0�1'lY� T fill, 91 y i4 m ?_+ rs y .W ,t *'IC 9v fD � Ybl r�� 1•,. . K i y Cui ( l �i N.,3 R w _. p t1 ,C �Y�` q` L r *r' �y1 '..P 7 /► R n aq 03 gg N N w ar M Y m Ik x c X X X X x ac, x ta X X x X X X Ik O X X :: X x X Ik X %C X M X j Ix t+s p X Ik Ik a, C A Ik X b X x x ' _ F� r t r w r o n 2 e > x J T 1 33. m m - O. �D M D, o >o to Fm < 2 o. 4 A 7C' Q`:1.� N NO t/t• .gip ^� 3 +N �W Aw'��'.Y WR'� � � "� o + n N O t+tt N t A. M. 1 \1! C Em.'li • jj CA y tn o„ .rS a r • ,•3y7 n n n I F Yc to n � K a - X c X X xa x x o x n x o Ik It X X x x X pe Xo X X O X Ik p X OX x X IX b to tk p I X CITY OFIRZA YINVO31T4:)* O rm W x X O o x lA _C ill ii i un n n O . t.ej f An K y C( M y i X `� z �y � rt r µ in J3 V!2 11 Q R Se AQT' 4 LA n m M a k b - 1/1 :3 rt. A I - L _ -n Gu et N q a er � O ro x w x x ;r, n stn d o ?CX 10 OP O X p� X X X X f1;,; n k x X X X( X X.. © n 03 ki un n n O . t.ej f An K y C( M y i un n n O X `� J3 w n n u n 03 ki ka e (us rtn •_- -A N w M i1 A 7 t F rt A a N 1 C •� a p O' N �tn x O N 3 b- u+ a O 7 X y .. x 3 ti n n 'n -t x cl K x x r x x x w >� CY"Y OF RAt ,, x x x x t o X A v X _ya n x MW j% Lt' :n 3 r r r ct N o caYYaG'o C A •, CL I G i WAN ^d 15nR > np 0 n w a r n a: a— >a� R• ! „ � j � ry ..� A .... is y � 9 �pY° Yy •!!,� L: ' w�L N �.Y en► � w w f o NR�'�f1 �a I3'Y.Y ,N.a� �Rw a M w? ay p, � � � � a°'h,an u � a N a N M G tlr Y2 T O - N N Cf is y IT 01 tiQ o a LA n a > > s > > > 8C n N 1. d 9 Como Sono r' >" Qi on n a o n n n m m Z, X p=X m rr m X Y X o a± w 1 ��� - e u C o a v a ^tdi o —o flyn, n d o G'In9 3 3'03'0 3 m n a a n n a a w w 0 C 7f N N • ®� 04 M t O O T M M M M. -C � IT 01 tiQ r. :f � � a Y1 - ,. `iTYOF RAIyC W a 1 iN O $ � n =0 i a• 13 3 w fu c ' nn'asn 7 c c to n 1t to �� -ci 5. 3 3 �• V =•'" 3 3 3 3 Rm�m g N E s� r- a X. N X. n & n < <p < in o c n fh g n S c 7^ p tlf n aA. p 11 7 a•. 7'7. a a n a a a a n. n q n C � d r 0. .�.�. n N N r N N� tWl� V1 . O e ca N O � n _ to s, a o 4 U2 tWr_+ i a i pN Y'1 n a 1 iN r �. L 1 L R t1T r J« s N N A 7 W N O to r9 N O. 7 7 Wx tA Z�rr O n S S o m w S�•Sn 0. 7 ,^• a wWn Ny,O�;e p N Q A m n.� ao aX 7 W UY N n 7•'A N a +7 T 7 N b y W x� w 1C 1_N iL Y{ 71 UT b y n N A A^ p $ C N V• tow v IL 7 G.o N J A'�•a � 'A Uf ,n N a:aa o.ea. . —N vi rn n aQa as o a a Ca in N> -,V c 03 n n ��.n a mp °n r mG �.o3c Ada r th a 1a Sa n f 7 n el .' 4 a 4t 3. .� n " 7° g 7 •c r ^' °r6a.734 o 0 �nt 1 �n <a���•^ O t F. N � n =0 i a• ➢ q .9 r �. L 1 L R t1T r J« s N N A 7 W N O to r9 N O. 7 7 Wx tA Z�rr O n S S o m w S�•Sn 0. 7 ,^• a wWn Ny,O�;e p N Q A m n.� ao aX 7 W UY N n 7•'A N a +7 T 7 N b y W x� w 1C 1_N iL Y{ 71 UT b y n N A A^ p $ C N V• tow v IL 7 G.o N J A'�•a � 'A Uf ,n N a:aa o.ea. . —N vi rn n aQa as o a a Ca in N> -,V c 03 n n ��.n a mp °n r mG �.o3c Ada r th a 1a Sa n f 7 n el .' 4 a 4t 3. .� n " 7° g 7 •c r ^' °r6a.734 o 0 �nt 1 �n <a���•^ O t F. � n D a i a• ➢ q .9 'n c ' nn'asn Oro 0 p c n t.m�m Rm�m s� o'•� a X. N X. < <p < in a a a n. r �. L 1 L R t1T r J« s N N A 7 W N O to r9 N O. 7 7 Wx tA Z�rr O n S S o m w S�•Sn 0. 7 ,^• a wWn Ny,O�;e p N Q A m n.� ao aX 7 W UY N n 7•'A N a +7 T 7 N b y W x� w 1C 1_N iL Y{ 71 UT b y n N A A^ p $ C N V• tow v IL 7 G.o N J A'�•a � 'A Uf ,n N a:aa o.ea. . —N vi rn n aQa as o a a Ca in N> -,V c 03 n n ��.n a mp °n r mG �.o3c Ada r th a 1a Sa n f 7 n el .' 4 a 4t 3. .� n " 7° g 7 •c r ^' °r6a.734 o 0 �nt 1 �n <a���•^ O t F. r 71, �17'111 t c� too Aw 8 1 A C4 ET 2 � �- ro ••�' ,cat �',. �,re , a� � �n , -�i mt ° :,^:: n S �i ° ~` mcP@4�..o ,p "fit ..:ate 3 ��+. .°.:o @ @ 1 < 0 A •IV5. °, *M,+O�O P. IT zW , _R N 3 n to - �, O. =.n=�. N A Ora Y: 3e n rh'�., yw 4 A 0. m _ F 7y. 3 m o ••G -t N °'.+r m d M -s a G. A m G. pDn�i o Qo n'� £ CD M z i N C n 11 w A I w O i5- R. Ao NR v o N . A � ry r M= O 71 ... N n WA ' CL c n / / K ° a b� �:"A re�d9 I in CL w W O ro caA = .... C rn 7 c w1D .w tv -ai g i y m con IA C. v^A ��n n g w ct� � 0 S d n n /1 @ PI Q N ta N H. +< ;lr 7y7' O' N m » H W� N Z tA CL Y N 0— A 0 O '1 m0) •M• 3 . C+ g � � N n O O. lT !O k jk X X p x O x x t7 S . --a n w o o �� 10, Ik ;k IX Ik p iX O O X x ik N � * M h l m to W m -s w z C x x mom`"+ ET 2 riz,A� do < � !L,4 ro °, n , _R N 3 n N G A ion N p m 2p 7y. O N m G. 'NH ~ Nw Qo n 11 O i5- NN NR 41 N . A � ry r M= O 71 ... N n WA ' �M N N N N V C. .0 w W O ro caA = .... C rn 7 -ai g i W u C. n a v w 0 S d n n a G. N ta H. +< ;lr 7y7' O' N m » H W� N Z tA CL Y N 0— g � � N w pj X >J�c x r, x xy, xp, x x x o xp x x o x x x ik x x Ix Ya Ik x x Xk Ix x IP. X O O ~ x x Ix x I6 x tk x tk pe 1� Ic x o I y Ix X Ik x lx X X a IN O X x X'x X x 7v X x x x X Ik x N x �x ID Ix x o Ix I* I* IX X x i Ix St X 0 n n N X X lk ;U x x ^ITY OF R^, y0 _x Ox x x M � r ��' r A M O Ay P aS E 4 O a qQ1 ? of -`1 K tA to A rl 7 @t , n® @ Rir 7: L-4 cr 1 tb1 p „0 z� 6•-• 1Y. C6 0:3 ?J p pf nm7 a1+. ►�' O F@+. C °a 6f'A' Y .41 X R W iji G d @. i7 R A.'3 M- @ o" 7 f9 '.m LQ d rt fA " "f "-*a. -{ p a i1 ¢ C o, l� .a C3: N� " 1 N ;23 m t+ @ b@ M K Q. N N .y ... 7 � Y R Y 2 " Y , LI ,� :'3:r O �+ . ((Db '!%.: K: Y . C Lk a CS ."'A RO rt M W - D p,�. F4 f'i. m R @ C tt "1 m ® 7 9 A M d. D i. p, D iQ�+. N N rr O yy p r1 Q 9 r '4°7. �. d N '6 d H r� 3 iS' W W K m .r `.Y !s SR W£ 6t D K W p ~ Y 00 rt 1+ N Y N 7 ff N 0.0 n- Ci O. Y p �y. 3 Y .� Y .7 .µ W } 4 ,Z G M me'® 0 �'y„ t-ti n 0D¢ p. M R W O W E to �� a s� � A� t. M rq N L! WttR R d r@! .�1 O t d 0 t�1! rT 'N " p A. O rt p < 0>•' @ w A ° r D M r A Y w tA 7973 M R A CC Y R UD 0rH+ ! li . RI H W FA - A. na @ D rI •� N rt m n p _a m I R o N v Fµ+ ~ N IA y Ix X Ik x lx X X a IN O X x X'x X x 7v X x x x X Ik x N x �x ID Ix x o Ix I* I* IX X x i Ix St X 0 n n N X X lk ;U x x ^ITY OF R^, y0 _x X X x xtx x Fn In r4 Ix lk Ia X .� IM x b Ix O (n 1010 X O �� !n I c X r 133 x X Ox x x M � r ��' r A M O Ay P aS E 4 O a qQ1 ? of -`1 K tA to A 7 @t , n® @ Rir 7: E firm 1 tb1 p „0 z� 6•-• 1Y. C6 0:3 ?J p pf nm7 a1+. ►�' O F@+. C .. m r `- a A' N 3Y z VS N LI lu C6 N D O yy N -% A n m N N `H to p. .µ W P1 0 rT X X x xtx x Fn In r4 Ix lk Ia X .� IM x b Ix O (n 1010 X O �� !n I c X r 133 x X Ox x x A 0 .y a N A n N ! O a r V` 3 C 3 d 5r ' p O �!' � z.0 07 1Q D O �•'�1' O � C �.. .+ b '1 �•+ > 5 0-19 Wit C. M. !Tj „� N ij 9 4� .al. �; Y. �u N,. N 1y yNj it LL. _ C 3 ti w. n a _tom f � xxxxxxxo xaxx x n x x x x x ix, we r x x x x x t>< t� l r m -v Cv a �w Dr _� G vim+ _CL N a vii CD I CL 0 CD IA C v a y m Q rt c -S ci X+ Ci � yr � v cn w m - - a.Q 1 T° n N I C a.. C R M I n C W N \xx n m e m •ty a w N 2 K x Q x x X x N n A to N � ° N N I C a.. C R M I \xx K x Q x x X x C