The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1987/07/22 - Agenda Packetg1l 1 11 �! I � I I! IF q ac�c�ta (i eT a? CITY OF RANCHO CL:CA-*v J AGENLEA WEDGES )AY JilL'i - .22,1987 7;00 p.m, TION PARK COMKUMY CMTk & l IiII ' RA CHO C_ IIG ii1 OHI GA, CALJFOJ UA L Pledge of Alle lane IL Roll Call Commissioner Slakesley^ Commissioner Emeriek Commissioner Clutiea Commissioner Meffiel Commissioner Tolstoy t IIL DESIGN AWARDS PR8'.SJ�WA.:JON IV. H of Minutes April 30, 3987 M,vy 18, 198'1 May 27, 1587 Junf- ,10,1987 Y. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected' to be. routine and hon- controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discusscon. If;_anyone, has concern over any item, It should be removed for discussfon " A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEMI FOR DEITLOPMENT REVIEW 87 -24 - PIER I iMPQIff WEST - A proposal to construct a 165,074 square foot warehouse /distribution building addition in the General Industrial District, Subarea 11, on 18.8 acres of land located on the west side of Buffalo Avenue north of 6th Street APN 229- 262 -27. VL Public Hearings The following items are p. blic hearings in which concerned- individuals, may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait ;,�,-, be recognized by the Chairman- and address the $ CommWon by stating ylur name and address. All such pre nions shall be Limited to 5 minutes per individual For each project. G "� �.� CITY OF CQNEVPS-S1CN AGELNEA 1977 \ l� WEDNESDAY JULY 22, 11187^ ZkbU P7�• iJON9"PARK COIIdRSUNITY CEbITER", '' 0161 BASE LINE RANCgO CUCAKONGA, CALIFORNIA \\ L Pledge of AllegiancEC IL Ron can ,. Commissioner Blakesley _ Commissioner Emerick Commissioner Ghitiea Commissioner Mci+liel Commissioner Tolstoy RESIGN AWARDS PRESENTATION TV. . ppwval of Minutes April 30, 1987 b ,May 18,.JR87 May 27,118 7 4une 30, 1987 V QW=nt Calendar The follouw qg Consent Calendar items are expected- to be_ r`1oc:tine and`non- controversial. They will be acted on by the Oommission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMEN21 REVIEW 87 -24 - PIER -11-1 WEST --A proposal to construct a 165,074 square foot warehouseidistribution building addition in the General Industrial D ;strict, Subarea 11, on 18.8 acres of land located on the wrest side of Buffalo Avenue north of 6th S -eet - APX 229-262-27. VL Pudic Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned indiv duols may voice their opinion of the related project. Please w5,,' to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for Each projeef. 7r 1 ^f 7 "Yi j B'' F,�!?aEYtLM +EOIxACr kt1'T Von—T �{ RV caused a rec"�ren�t%nfoe�ifficona€ t1i��Drf .�yvirarme�La"+` Imp�� +Repbrf for �7te 'F�ao�i�t ' �LiTet�ard , Speo��c �,lar s;eet `Ohe �ect�ic Platt et,�zss�sts of deta;led lY{ttii use itegula°tiots and' stdtldaids far tiie deveTgpet alatt 'l?ooth131' Bouuvarcl betweegt ,G�e Avenue road Seen Avenue,,tcveei� tit$ teawy' `d Gontit Bred from o, y 8;195,7). C. JMPT I" BaRLWAAD SPEOIIiIG PLAN - A public �aearitg to [ °i cors�de aPOrnC�a1 0 the d ;e(tootiititaulevard Seeiiia Pate n cat peei#fe F2an!Orov.!W '_s fkr �detaii i Ian d use e0egaties ;and ei'eVelopYnent standards far all future 1 _ development on prapenties •adjacent to Foothill Eoulevard iG`ont need front duly 8,19F7) D. A. °IBE5B1V�Ei3'P ,111LD GENRAFl ALAN '�0, AMEND'avi i� 3N -, Cif iiAIICF3€2 `OUC�11LONG -- - A request attend the Land' Use Mafi of the General Plin to refieet'fe d use. chars by the Foothill j k: proposed Boulevard Specific" Plan. (Continued from July 8, 1987). E. ENVIRONiMEF Al, ASSESSMENT AND ETli1LANDi3 `j SPE91F1C AWN APa.EIL,DUENT 8,7 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -, An; amendment to remove from the Etiwanda Specific Plan approximately 57 acres of land on the north side of FcothM Boulevard between the 1-15 Freeway and East Avenue; appopdmately 5 acres of land on- the southeast Corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill ' Boulevard; and approximately 14 acres of land on the southwest eornw- of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 227-211-2,'y 25 & 27, APN 027 221- 01-G?, 07-09} 14 & 22 -27, APN 227-231-19, 21, 28, 29, 33 & 34, APN 229-311 - 14 be 15, APN 229- 041 -10, and portions of APN 2.27- 231 -16 . & 23. _ F. ENVMONME14TAL ASSESSMENT Al'iD INZ3USMIAL SMIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -01 CITY OF ItANCI O CUCAMONGA - An amendment to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan approxiir_ately 80 acres of land on the south side of FoothM Boulevard between the I- 15 Freeway and Etlwanda „Avenue - AP14 229. 031 -01, 16 de 20 and portions of 229 - 021-57'& 59. ; o � n G. E`NVIRONMEWAL, ASSESSMENT AND TENTS IVE PAR(�EL MAP 5996 ^ DAYIII �:BOTA',D�{.- A Subdivisl0*� Qf Z2 acr~ . o� land' Into 4 parcels ill tYie %ry. Low (2 dwelli unffs per acre) Resid6tiai Development Distrlct Iodated on 4 the south side of YAson Avenue, eatt of Mayberry 6enue - i APH 261181-59. ReUted File VA 8`1 -08. YARUNCE 'BOWDEN 37-WA - - A request to reduce ndnimuftk lo't depth• and minimum net average lot A gar a 2 a0re parcel in the Very Lo- Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Wilson,Avenue east of Mayberry Avenue -- APN 201-181- 59 Reiatgt, Pile TPM 5996. L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITI014AL 1`r U li. PER1FiIT 8i 25 - BURK - A request to establish _a ' gymnastics school within "Pe Industrial Park T istrict (Subarea, S ), located at 855fUtia .Avenue 0.200) - APN 209 - 1,4218. �' J. t&VIRONMENTAD r ASSES ".- ffT AND TEPtT TIV -- _ TRACT 135fifi �'CARYN (rOMP NY - A propo,Rel to - subdivide 67,8 acFes into 161 single family lots it the' Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acr(-) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Summit Avenue and Almond Street - APN 226 -111-02. e K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMEI4DMENT �Ro01�inTdLLIAi4I- LYON COMPANY - A re%_ast to amend the Victoria Community A.l tel: to reduce the minimum required lot depth on 3 }000 square foot lofa from 75 feet to 60 feet, to reduce the minimum required lot depth on 4,000 square foot lots from 80 feet to 7C feet, and to require a minimum tarn (10) foot-front yard setback for the living srza on 3,000 ai d' 4,000 square foot lots. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL, IISE "PERMli' 8 ? -19 - SHARING THE WORD FELLOWSHIP - The development Wf a f4aster PLart Church Facility consisting of a worahip cente?, office building, classroom building, and multi - purpose building and a request to use the facility as a' dayeare center on a 3.87 acre parcel ;of land in the Low Density Residential District 12-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the sou.hwest corner or Jasper Street and Lomita Drive - APN 202 -036 -13.. Associated with this project is Tree Removal Permit 57 -34. jC O > 3 � 7 F _.. . .}gyp .. '; �+ *,� M A'+'Y� %il1'ltieif ,WR.lW% -A1, .. _. ASSESlT.1tL'NKID _ .: N "F:4p1nW iitassti�sulWd U TF in0ar s , ' to lists. in the Low;14ledhumr P.eAleaisa= dtiotellii� units pot- ac z vw.h(ri,, 3'►'e vet itu Planned mi�xurc� ,located: at t3ie soufliWest coiner of. V4estania. Park -Lane ' 2tbehesfek. $�renue - �� ?27 0;8i�i4, ltk ash: X. LN M066WNT, T AM �u�TD�Ct)�IrAL 4 • U 11tLT` 8 ; t - If V�IS • i - A rsguest for tthhe,. xiistall&tioir temporar csf a muciulae structuw' to gerv* as an in r twits it center- for . errs, Yist�a' srftaated on, a 50.40 acre parcel' Within the: 't'0=ihuntiy Commerciel�' Ezistrie+s ( - of Tema ryist*a Iocated on the northeast earner of Foothill r a anti its�se �Aaenue - APR 10,77-421-05. : I �`� O. ENVr tONMENTAL _ ASSESSMENT ND TERTA MZA �I.AN'•I1RI� fJ '1ti4sIF1��lN�},°t�'�',?�rNII`i� ,$'£ Q� - Ni:E�R2T h FR Rai 'S r cl Te> isa Vista ' 1?Ianned. �i Community by es#ablishiV a. Business Pak Overlay Zone for areas designated as Office Park, Commercial, and Mixed Use, within the planned community boundary. ' P. MQ,531F1CAT10'_q AND TIME PXXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 8F-O6 - LM,-_()L-N - The development of 624 apartment units on 2.7.6 net acres of land in the Medium -High Residential District (14-24 dwelliiag units per acre), located on the north side of Arrow Route, west of Haven Avenue - APN 208 - 341 -16 and 17. VIL New Business Q. TRACT 13542 DWiGN REVIEW - GRIGSBY - Design Review of building elevations and pot plans for Phase I of a previously approved tract map, consisting of 96: single ! family lots in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 : dwelling tits per acre), located between Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street, east of Chaffey College - ARK 201-191- 17 and a portion of 201-191-11. R. DEVELOPMENT `' REVIEW 85-48 MQ,D ° ICAvTIC31t - GOLDEN THFdST - A request to modify the approved edeg nt colors for 8 multi- tonant Industrial buiidirigs deveI r s oil acres of land in the. general Industrial. District Nub a>♦es 1 3, located at the northeast corner of '7th Stra:ei ands Hellman - A:PN 209 7"71 -20, 36, 49, 50, 51 5.2: ' 1i°eyTrctect i' Files DR 8548. r i r = � o (� *PHINE OF MFLUR*CR i E `7 f, --= ✓r— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT _ z � U}, . a 1977 DATE:; July 2Z, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, assistant ;Planner SUBJECT: ENVIR Nh1EyTpL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -24 - proposa o cans ruct a square oat —"-- ,house /distribution building .addition,.in a. the General Industrial District, Subarea 11, on 18.8 _ , ps of land located on the wrest side of Buffalo Avenue north of 6th Street - APN: 229- 262 -27. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding �Land Use aad 2nning or - .. rus r a uFa— Yle�alt (General Industrial ) South - Industrial, Subarea 11 (General Industrial) East - Vacant, Subarea 13 (General Industrial) West - industrial, Subarea li (General Industrial) C. General Plan Designations: roJec e - enera n ustrial North General Industrial South - General industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site is the rear .portion of an T- ex s ng o w c as an established warehouse /distribution facility. That portion of the lot has no structures; however, there are existing grape vines. There is an approximate 8' downward slope from the existing building's finished pad elevatir�n towards the westerly vacant portion of the lot. The Propoti s north and west have existing structures. The site to the south will soon be under construction. ( r� ITEM A — : t 1777- 7111� {; t PLANNING CfhNb1ISS10 STAFF REPORT OR 87 -24 - Pier i Imports, blest July 22, 1987 l Page 2 �, 93 k 9 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of x ' Type 'square Parking Spaces ;paces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided .:: Warehouse: Existina 254,000 varies* 30 30 t = :. Propo -A 155,074 varies,* 95 134 :. Office 9 ,030 1/250 36 3 >f Total 151 200 *Warehouse /distribution parking ratio: t 1 /1000 for the first 20,000 square feet 1/2000 for the second 20,000 square,feet V4000 for everything over 40,000 square feet ; g t II. ANALYSIS; A. General: The project i s the Second phase of Pf ' r I Imparts ware Ouse /distribution facility. The project is in confomance with the Industrial Speciffic Plan and the provisions of Subarea 11. -this type of use is consi-stent with surrounding uses. The project has been reviewed by'the Design and Technical Review Covnittees. -Upail approval of the Negative Declaration the City Planner w; great final approval of the project ,based on conditions reconiended by the ,Design and Technical Review 0mmittees. P. Desi rn.Review Committee: The Committee (Chitiea, McNiel, FongY rev-e-wed tne project on .�Iuly 2, 1987 ane forwarded it to the Planning Comission with the following recommendations: 1. Gray accent bands, iAnticaT to those found on Phase I, should be provided on Phase II. 2. Colors and materials for the scv'en wall along the south property line should be coordinated with the main building. 3. In order to provide adequate height for screening at the southwest corner of the site, a terraced landscape area would be appropriate. Detailed design should be subjected to City Planner review and approval. 4. Adequate landscaping to be determined by the City Planner 1 should be provided along the south property line within the 3 ,i slope Easement, J °i 1 t: Tr Ml I.x Xt r oI of s t h e�� C �h d oo At ' 4 ParTtsa 1tr y i. ^ yy� y« y� y. p •* ... . lYT.« � FQ�.eek9iX ps1.4f e:.. U i'i+ r�#rvp',Lite � t W � ye,tcmmt erl , �t a%e Ilt_ Specrc P�ian azu1 x she appl.i�ca'bFe G r 47 a-9 a re a tha It nah''vo, �3� sse °on , w opilel r Re ear, 7- 2 ,x Resful�l;,�� Brad Btu City P' annex'. BB:GG:vc Attarhwants: EXchibi,t "'A" - Location flop Exhf'bit "'B" - Site Plan Exhibit "cm - Eleuatfons G a ;r. . ,.6.i..'.�.ii Yh1.�tV:w �,• _ �]dK3`�Cm'..e 't „�axx'w. <u_ +l .a f F 1` Ia ,3Y x 2f 09 AC 34+ J 3 q 9AS x F 1, N Par, 1 7 Pad 1% .ss,.r - •er,.r' _.' o cat �P ' vsr: rncnr i °* 1� g m � 3 1 y c M .Pact Par.2 2: •ReL2 L rxr�� q / • ZS.dtiAC 3 y 1._6.M AC: 18.96 AC Pur.5' tJSSAC • P S " i pact PasgPaa3= it Fu3 eA3a pw. P4_r.T Por.4 C, * t3 y 'fTQf y i 932AC, 1 3. 96AC� 3 Per 2 6.746AC cN. sx.s 1.94 AC U AC was ,� 1Las's 210 AC Z2 AG V 1 Par.2 ` I ?cfi e h. Pon T < a a Aar, t A 13.77AC 1j 12 V i `e 9 794 AC. +S - 40 - 16 AG • x'" 4.302 AC a : ' �w� y 342O4 Tlw•- 9a. — � 1 '- JiY.0.T -, 24... 41 9.7e A^ 12 i s N " - ti 42 136 AC- 1113 , m Ul @ ffil9. AC �< 43 936 iC u 9 a CITY CF rrEM- rl 1 3 C7 - r E k sa.d+wa..K ia,wcuekNCU N :1.2, A.-em; �" �� i ■ourH �K•vwzao� niw r Zft 1N, • 11F0#1TF1 ■LEVArnaw X. ZVlilel c.gaY.resdl' _waor M I MY CF RAM TTF'LEX.�Csr-LiJ -= CrrY OF RAN H6 CUCAMONGA �I STAFF REPORT 1� DATE' J+itl V 22 I987 E TO. Chairman and Members of the Plafihing Commission FROM: Brad Butler, City Planner BY Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENYIRONMEh1TAL IM*_T REPORT FOR TttE _,FOOTHILL sOULSYARD �t - >o reyfex a cot's ? r a reooamaen` on FO- cer l a�ioR of the Draft Environmental'_ Impac L Report for the Foothill Boe;tvar t Specific Plan project. The Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the development along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, between the I -15 Freeway and East Avenue. (Continued from July 8, 1987) I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission �aill hold a continued public hearing o consider responses to the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. This report summari,tes the environmental issues raised in the response on ^-xnmercial land use, traffic and circulation and realignment of Red' Hill County Club Drive. Furthers recognition of significant unavoidable impacts is identified and .a suggested statement of overriding consideration is provided, It. BACKGROUND: At the July 8, 1987 meeting, the Planning Commission rev ewe responses to environmental concerns relating to student generation, land use and air quality. The Commissioq concluded the responses were adequate in these areas, but as a result of a request oy Lis Homes, final reYiew of the land use issue was delayed until this meeting. In addition, traffic concerns from the City of Upland, Cal Trans and owner of affected Red Hill property will bi= analyzed and addressed in this report. III. DISCUSSION: Commercial Land. Usti: As of the writing of this report, the additional npu expected from Lewis domes had not been received by staff. If the additional information is provided, it will be presented at the night of the meeting. ,ITEM 9 PLAN RE, 0 �T Al opTi ,iIC•.. P�.}i�i Page 2,. r. U `.Traffic CircuUdoft Th'e're�sonSP.s to hiho. Ga3Tr,gt�s concerns pii c roOa an >; sees °awe oontained fn the EU.R consult�al t °s � (see Exhibit, r, � of duFiy lfi, i9 7, The a responses whioh fih��. -' Engineie/ ng "i ision concne wYtil will f'o a ar f t fi , W if tt a Plan ng' Gotm fss i06 finds that ,they A6 p t o e .na iw1K adt.4uate�ly ad�ees the �� stated concerns, 3ied HI'l1 Count Clilb Dim W ltse potential rell4ocetion of Red lfii1T' o T1r ve .a :o r e Av tsue causede concern by the . affect. .d prcoety owi*,r a'od '� t of Upland. Upland's ca n , aie� l addressed in: the 'SCR 4on; tinVs memo oz July 15, 198- fse,e' Ubi"b 't *O t:. The property owner commissloned 41 traffic stud comparing proposedi)realignmeni wi't�t'an route to, F6-, thil-1 aiterna Boulevrr eas�Af the intersection. present W5,traff3c study was reviewLd -o by �.`,Ity staff and th,,- Fvo jsili Fla tra ficc engineering cons�sl'tati- The dontents of t` i study ajid the results of the reviews a :,* summarized below: Traffi� c- Stuc(y (Property finer generated' LL, ANk t Alternate A: Connect Red`llill County Club Drive,', to ' Foothill, eaet of current location. A. �t6ZT connection would . allow apFogressive tr -"fic flow on Foothill Bcufavat°d, if sigaaiizjd. 2< 6etter commercial. access would be obtal.led because of an additional opportuni;.ty for U- turns. Alternate B: Connect to C-rove ,Aven e, 1 1. Traffic volumes on Grove nokt of Foothill watild cause back --up- Aicil would b)'ocky the new connection. 2. A street through the property at tki' northeast corner of grove and Foothill would constrain development. 3. Such a street wot.'' l have to be of a substandard design through the'Oroperiy. 11 sk . a �STJifF jiFORT ,.. iE _ F00 E 'B,4tl} SMIl IG Fi AX' -L9TR I Qslge A -response_ by UV Md plan CO 11 taut Al4eroatte A' tannest to Foothill Souieverd.<, I. The conditions under irhish the pragressje mavemeht w.oulli be possibl `would require the use Of Aa w4aw signal"; ° wkgh voulyd 61f be possible in the 14' median required iii Fat ill, or wol d rti } .4ireinappropriate signal ° it ai -dg.. 2: e -a tun S a«;ailabl� at GrOve Avenue An�i at Sass 8�rnandipo .Road will pr6 ide_ suffic�iigt access tai ,p p erty °Along Foothill. r, 3. The study failed Ito comment on. the ader'e ' traffic impact upon the Red-'' -Mll neighborhadt, wrIch. would be caused by a signalized, direct, .; connection to Foot'i11. Alternate Bt Connect to Grove�Ivenue. 1. The kigh ,traFffic vol. lRes predicted an 6rove -enue canr�t be substantiated. This re- routing ' of Red tiiW',Courrtry Gluts Drive will reduce its - traffic voiu r by 50 %, thus the increase traffic intro dU gd d�:.To Drove -_` ;;Mue will be of ° insignificant effect on the Foothill /Grove intersection. -\ 2. Prr�Orty, development often involves the need for " 44nificant street constructioA even when no Subdivision is involved. The impact of a street through this property is, therefor, not unlike several similar cases in the City which have or will occur, 3. A street zli nment through the y r g g �praper�,� is possible which minimizes Impact on development and allows safe traffic service ; i 4. The study failed to comment an -the impact on property of a connection to Foothill, which would be .significant in- that art entire lot wouidS•,"_ye to be dedicated or purchased. �\`f AIL T J _ , FLA�3NIt '.G, i Sit}i2 , R - r RE: FOOTHl"L� BOUi,fVl� SPECIFIC PLAN EIR � � July 22, 1,98? - Page 4 , `believe To summarize, C'-ty staff aad the r-M consultant the ti potential impacts of the Red Hill CoU64 0,u6 Drive realignMent are not significant whh. viewed within the total traffic and land use structure which exists i the immediate area; Further, the ',mproverent in circulation,' for ~* Red Hill Country Clsib Drive and i oothill Boulevard, halance benefici3lly agakinst"' the level of negative - impacts which eight occur;-; Grove Avenue. Also, Gal Trans Rs commented favorably on tite realignment. Y °by The issues raised OalTrans, as to street improvements, cafi be mitig3.t "= ajr following Gal Trans, standards ,in',. \the Vital. desi ,ii of � each element, IV, CONCLUSIONS: ;he EM concludes that there are signiffcant rreYerc #e rnvironmental changes and these are summarized- in Sectioa M of the EIp, These changes which will occur as a r4suit of the project approval are as follows. ' L An incremental increase to local air pollutant emissions, and a decrease in air quality 4ownwind of the study area. ;ntal'air pollutant emissions are summarized in Table IV -O/E of this document. Mr- pollutant emissions will be slightly higher than •1'' those vhikij .would result if the .proposed project wer^ not .,. approved: , 2, An incremental increase in the consumption of water, and 0an attendant increase in the generation of wastewater, compared to existing levels. water consumption and sewae generation ` (which area discussed in Section IV-K) will be' higher than levels which would result if the proposed project were not approved, although levels would continue to Increase even if the proposed specific plan were not zipproved. S. .0 increase in the amount of stores water runoff produced by the project area during storms, compared to exist;ng levels, . !Ultimate storm flows will be marginally nigher than levels } which woul:: result if the proposed project were not approved. 4. An increase in local traffic volumes . compared to existing levels. The number �f trips generated within the study z--rea -will be approximately 34.2 percent higher than would be the case if the proposed pso(ect were not approved., Further, potential impacts of the rrviserl` circulation ;systev can be mitigated or f the improvements resulting in n, .overall improvement to circulation in the rorridir balance favorably against 'h* potential impacts. I PLANNING COMISSIQN ,STAFF REPORT } REi FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC' PLAN EIR July 22, 1987 Page 5 S. An increase in noise levels, compared" to existing levels. Noise levers will be marginally higher than if the proposed project were not approved. The EIR concludes through analysis of the alternatives that wany`of the potential impacts would occur in the corridor without the enactment of the plan `ds a result of development under existing regulatory provisions. Further, the report recognizes that the Specific Plan is designed to reduce most of the anticipated problems re!.nilting from. development in the corridor. As a result, td' W501y with iCEQA requirements, a Statement of Overridin5 ?Consid:- cations must be included with the .final EIR actioEr. St -;off ;-ecomnds the following statement be provided for this purpose- "Futuro development proposals submitted under `the Foothill Bou3 -yard Specific Plan have the potential for creating some significant environmental effects which cannot be fully mitigated. These effects, identified in the final EIR. are the unavoidable result of development ;taking place in partially developed commercial areas of the"rommunity. However, the degree of these impacts is being mitigated to the fullest extent feasible through the measures incorporated into the FIR,, and the drift Specific Plan. The Foothill Boulevard ,Sp6 :. fJc Pian Itzelf is a measure: to mitigate potential adverse impacts of development on the existing community which would otherwise occur without a planned and comprehensive approach. The draft Specific Plan contaa,iIns, provisions tailored-to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor ane,'-is meant to replace existing City -wide zoning regulations 'that do not address the unique.qualities and community traits of a significant' portion of the'City of Rancho Cucamonga. Consequently, the adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Dian will result in potent.'l environmantai effects that are substantially less significant in scope and extent than those affects which would otherwise occur under existing zoning regulations." Y. RECOM!9ENDATION, It is recommsended that the Planning Cmission recommend a the City Council the certification of the Foothill Boulevard Specific -,Plan Environmental Impact Report and Addendum by the adoption of the attached Resolution which includes a Statement of Overriding Considerations. r #t ' ti0 s,. {� PLAN' £I� Pale. 4l $r r City Fl nnisr ®6 :AWko Attachments: EkW ft. '"A� .,- Amended El P-, ages S ExEtibft �i`' - tetier atn a of Upta�td Exri °' Let er rmC, rays :� �t D -!moo fi ate ii ni ;n4 WrKS,rk'1 duly? IS., 1987 t 1 ',j i E 5iestotr Bk'ings a ana "J" d l-ates Traffic t5$uc April 7, 1987 , Letter fret Dins Assts -.fates, Jane 12 1987 Draft Resdi ui-i"e o f CID i i Ipb• � ^ "'v 4 CIRCULATION m� J According to DhS, "tie construction of the x.jaxsed sec+:ar.., " is necessarY to acc.:Pmmcdate increased dsvelcoment and traffic demand. thi median is essential for ,r. efficient and safe future traffic .1 Op`4-r3t3.nnS alone Focthill Boulevard_" (Tex-t from -DIKS Technical Memorandum) In general, construction of a raised median woul,i improve traffic flow by re$ucing;mid -block turning motions as drivers - `," enter and exit si es on, the opposite side of the street, ` Vehicles making these turns can, impedes, the flow of through 4. traffic as they cress traifi,c lanes to ant r or axle driveways. Lack of a raised median can resul±-J � in significant traffic hazards, since motorists must cross onc�iming traffic to mane left turns into and, out of driveways an Foot}lill Boulevard, Safety for pedestrians would also be increase lby the median, since rs crosswalk areas are more clearly markediat median, break points, P_ and since thE:...,- n9dian can serve as a safo stopping place f or persons who can'' -r_.S cress Foothill Boulevard during one 'signal interva:lc The proposed specific plan also encourages the consolidation G of access 'points to multi- tenant devplgrs:ents and -separate parcels to :-educe the nuwber of acces�paints an Foothall Boulevard. ii e. Oxher Circulation System Improvements. s; k addition to the construction of a raised median, several other potential circ.rlatzon system improvements are examir.ed in Chapter Y, of this document and in the proposed specific plan. These improvements ❑anszst of realignments or extensions of Red Hi4l Drive and San.Diego Avenue. fft P4edlan Conmtruction. Maintenance. and Landscaping. /( The raised zciian discussed above will result in secondary J {� impacts ird addition to improving the ability nf, Foothill { Boulevard ±o carte through traffic. These impacts are dzsc:rssed below: _: Construction Developme =t of the median improvements will require that some yrrk occur within the Foothil -1 Boulevard right --of- vav, resulting an temporary inconveniences to drivers. it 3 r CIRCULATIGH � t J 0 n- - - Kai :ntehanoe. Landmcapinct plan 4d within the roPOi6d median will reguire re�ar d+aintenan. and irrigation, pota-ntially resulting '`im tem;oorary disrupticns of traffic flew '-'if 11) work within- the m4daars requires t at a lane( s) be cipsrd for safety to the workers, or water is overapolied -' and causes Pavement to become wet. Tine first impact can likely he by scheduling work to avoid RMAX hour traffic conditioon ; the fond can be avoided by reducing irrigation a.nd m8naaino the acplication of water. Landscaping The planting at trees within the median could pose a ha^ard to motorists striking these trees durin0 accidents. According to the state Dewar -ment of !)Transportation, tree ai___ce should be lim±.ted to a four inch rtiam� titer or less, since trees- o_ this size do not typically cauS(e severe damage to vehicles when struck. In addition, yo)aDg trees could clscure views of slr:;''ers until they are oi_d enough to allow views under the'lr fc41,-•? 4. Mitigation Measures Thq, following :neasures are proposed to mitigate Circulaticn n impactsiof the proposed pro3ect: F.. -r. All study area intersections should be improved to their ultimate configurations as sc*on as possible. -- A raised median, as described in the proposed specific r' plan, shall be constructed along the Foothill §oule- vard. - Realignments oY extensions of roadways as described in the proposed 5 ecsfic plan shall occur as quickly as,_," possible. -- The City shall select which, if any„ of the proposed roadway realignments examined in Chapter V. Section F, will be implemented. If selected, construction of realignments shall occur as quickly'as possible. The City, as discussed in the proposed specific plan, r� shall 'encourage- the consolr,datxon of access poants for .multi- tenant developments and multiple parcels.. CXRCULATION To reduce the numb --r of vehicle trip's generated within the study area. the :ity shall suppoI use of public "transit, rides licax,Yng, carpool3.ng, and s z,.Ear `measurers. Potential support�,strategies include: .t Providing in1mrmatioa, en available rideeshari�<tia, carpooling, and other services to all study area employers. �a Enzouraging study ar_a businesses to provide preferred parking spaces for vanpool or cai:pool vehicles. Providinn of bus turno"'f bus stops /shelters, and other' features to. fcommodate public transit services. The proposed specific plan, which will provide a signs '' fl,cant number of employment opportunities, will also�� ( ?4duce regional vehicle trips by allowing residents ofJ' Rancho Cucamonga to work wx.thin the city.: All roadway, median. and landscape inproveTeiits shall"F be'submttted to Caltrans for Yev, ew and anoroval. All :fork within the Foothill Boulevard right -of -way which reguires lane closure and /or 'traffic contro; shall be'bnnducted in comoiiance with state standarCs a_d shall include the use of warning signs and lane t a_ers. Maintenance work within the median shall be scheduled to avoid peak travel hours and reduce the patenixal for disrupting traffic flows. `` IIJ� Irrigation of landscaping within the proposedi';nedian shall be managed so as to reduce runoff to th'- extent e possibl. Potential runoff control measures d include- �1 Use of drought - tolerant leant s ectes t-- reduce the need for irrxgation. Use of drip or similar water - conserving irrigation systems. Geszan of the median tc incorporate sval2s t capture runoff within the median. T c F ^11 �_ ._. •.� -_. .,. �...., .,,._ .....;�'�`.^�a�4,. �_ ;l��a:+e.•til €!� ,. _ _ .. ... _, r... r..._, _ -.,mss. t�^� �� the st'uzf area -taap, i:.I, ty will be exceeded at S overal �ntersec- I tams even is planxied provements are conatr- ated. 40,+6vever, a l sance more than a35 p�tr- c t of total ' ra fic on Foothill aoulevarci will originate outside �e' study 1hree, the level, of mitt *lion available is small. Th `' while impacts of the prcapo;sd project Can be reduced, total y^ti�ulatIve impacts will not 'be mitigable 4 through the proposed pil�jt. Since the majority % }reSS c on Foothill Boulevard will be ; generated outside the at pK4 area, congestirin will •result even it the proposed project - vx "t approved. t_.nce c.4rrstruotion of roadway improvements would` 9" eonstruptgd in a piecemeal fashion if the proposed specific an as not approved, conge2tioin would be higher in the short term until all required improvements are constructed. O �� R CxlGiULA I'2dti. °. 5 5. Analiprl* o ,SYgnt icano a, The crnposed ar03'tot atxl1 -t acrease the outrher of vehicle trips ultimately geua' a �I percent more 'tvtps '0111 ba geae'rated within the stuA;yy a ea,, at � �1 b- !zldaut than would occur if the proposed projeo~t v6p,4,; :Lot approved.` ,` The o0'3»h3ssst- n Grf stump area traffic anad rig?tnal " t traifac w�li resvi. =ignaiicant 1&v:eI% of ..eangeOki.oin Within 7,777-11; }x wSCHOOLS R. SCRWLS This section prov.;des a siz. O:f the p- r-po ed, ;roject,s impact on the demand fCjr school, facilities gm-nerat4_.,d'ith:L the study area. 2. Existing Setting The study area is 'pzov�' ided with school services b.7, three school districts: Centrk4 c &)f School Distrit. Et'&;Uda,_ School Dist, ct, and the Chalfey N3rtat UAlon, High School DtwEr:v,_t._ a. School District Facilitlop, F_-C:U�ang school lacillties, maintained by the districts serving the study area are summarised in Table TVHA�\,c'belov. As shown in T�jble' IVY -H/A. all schools Serving the city--'vith i e exception oaf i,/L4anda-Xn-Ler?n4- diate and ttlwandra,, High School -- currently haste -more �atudents enrolled than they were designed to serve cir at�'capacjty,. P2anned school fac:Uities and their de-sign capaolties are shown In Table IV-H/B. 6/ tt <2 �: Y. \` t h �r �� SCHOOLS a TABLE IVY -H /A EXTSTING SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES {Seurcet School D1$tr1cts1 School Capacity/ Capaoit;. District Elem an' jary Sahoals Enrollment letnior High Schools Enrollment `,F�aa= ssxx4x)'Ixx s ¢ s- a-= a�sasat= .:ax`3�x�xxgaaa�xxG= �osC��s sxsn�a�rxcs3�o Central Central 5121555 Cucamonga Jr. High 85l�v 912 Valle Vista 629/657 ' Dana Korced 605 /801 sear ',gulch 650/690 Stivanda SSunwit Mementery 660/716 Etivanda Intermediate 360:292 Chaffey Joint Union High School District Alta Loma High School 2300/2300 Etivanda High School. 2500/1900 TABLE IV -H /H PLANNED SCHOOL FACILITIES ZSourc¢: School Di*tricts) X Planned Design Opening District School Capacity Date (Estimate) Central Coyote Canyon (Elem.) N /A' September 1987. ;° Elementary School 500 Prior to 1990` Terra Vis ta Jr. High. 800 Prior to 1990 Etivanda Windrai(a (Elem. ) 660 September 1987 Caryn (Elem.) 350 September 1988 Heritage (Elem.) 660 September Isaa Chaffey Joint Union Unnamed 2500 September 1x91; 1. Enrollment figure not available. When opened, Coyote-,Canyon school will contain 15 classrooms for grades 1 -6, two kindergarten classrooms, an.,. an administration building. Additional classrooms and a multi - purpose building will be constructed by 1589. ------------------------------ I� IV -H-2 SCHOOLS b. Schools Impact Fees. All of the school districts serving the study area currently assess school, impact, fees for nev residential and commercial development. According' to the elementary school districts, both are assessing .lees of $0.17 per square foot for commercial development and a1.O3 per square toot for residential units.' The Chafley Joint Union Hxgh School District &&mosses nev development at $0.47 per square . loot for residential development_.and $O.O8 per square foot for commercial development. or Student 6eneratinn Ratesr School districts nerving the stndv area have developed formulas which they use to determine how maxty students will be generated by a residential or commercial development; for use in determining the impact of a given development an the need for school facilitiear• Eommereial and residential generation factors used by the districts are discussed belmwr Eommercial- Student- 6ener'iatian Under the provision of new state law in effect since 3anr 3 1987,- commercials developments are cansidered to impact sch6a1 faciliti+ssr mince parents who live in one school district but work in arst'hc�,r may now choose to enroll their children in either diatrict: eamme -cial developments a1 any type which have employees,- there fore.- are conn_dered to have an impact on school'fac* }ftmear al- Legislation Affecting School Districts. Tradi- tional `7 schools; impacts have focused on the demand for students genera Xd hj+ D_ev residential development. Based an historical data collected by school districts or other- sources, the averages number of st *ldents living, in a given type of housing t s-!.nole family homes, apartments, etc.) could be must plied by the number of housing units proposed to calculate the number of students which would be generated by a given project. If a project had no residential comr-inent, %t vas assumed that no impact on schcoi facilities would result. New state legislation in effect since January 1, 1987, however, has resulted in potential changes to traditional school attendance p.tterlis which require that the �im acts of employment - enerating uses be examined. SoeEifically. 'AB 2071 (Allen) was enacted on January 1. requiring „ school districts thtagghout the, Eta t re to accept as students the children of parents who owork within a school distr,.ct`s boundaries, whether or not the family lives within the district. AB 2071 provides sow':_ orotecticn againat rapidly increasing enak- ollments for school d�'stricts- -that ..l is, a district nee -,not accept a non-resident sCud^nt if it can shoes that the additional; costf educating -'a transferred student would exceed the amount of additional state ald rr"o?j., -ad for &het student, Districts can alsa refuse to allow a.' ant tc be transferred out of their area if the transfer s+ould srcpact a co^ urtnrdered desegregation 1p an. Hawever, the a feet :.of the 1a-f in to aav each P.p employment- generating develo r ment (including the gr—q pas @±j prolect) the potential to imgaat schcoln bi, c;rgatina new Zabs and, potentially, bringing the children gff these war ers, Into local school district&'t (It may bed otad that many school dis- tri cts have historically accented non- resald nt studrtptW from ather districts an an informal basis: the effect =of AB 2071:trA to rNau3re districts to accent these stud ts" ai>d a) ;: canal se arrangements) . SCHOOLS A related ball, also in effect since January 1, 1987, AB " 2926. provided for the collection of f�^vea to pay for new facili- ties needed as the result a.f new ,,_.vmmerclal aid residential development. AH 2926 c� .tab2 s. ►ad zaximum ieert --s1 ?. 25 per square root for commercial cueveloumErnt aand 51.50 taar jrQsare foot for residential development which could be levied agjninst new con - struction. The bill a so prohibits local a enc ids s'.-om issuing AML building permits until the local school distract haes verified that these fees have be- �n ap ad. In addition, this ie Zlatian estabiishe!'� a list of all measures which could bemused to miti- `ate the 'Stchools impacts of any project, ba;- 1cally limitino- agencies and school districts to traditional mei'ods such as fees, :Sella- Ragas districts. dedication of Sandi and so on. Along with estabiishIna maximum fee limits and raafl-King the withholding of building permits until thene fees are aid AB :926 also requires that districts colleet3cnq „these'Fees shay -that the fee, '�- - shall bear a reasonable relationship and be limited to need for schools caused tx the deveplo2ment.0 A school district may gharge SAM amount uo tci the maximums estanlished in AB 2526, but must show a reasonablg relationship tetween need and the fees it is charging. It sr�ould ",he noted d that some istricta in slow- aroving,2ortions of slate are charaino very I--. Ui vhil � others are the Maximum sllowed GL law and also relyina on ot1: Funding mechanisms to meet their need for school facilities fiY'ndina. - ScHQQLS `. �Commsa l Student Geeoer®t on.�� Amsess n ttse s:moacts of camaaarcdia,T: facil__^__ ^times reauares that a /tseries of auestitina bs an�'wrered:_ J 2> What s the emra30vmer t den -Lty f.�,n em ioye_ra gee souare %a#', tF a =Wum%er of s ogre, ;tQet of a i, ven t *ae qt ccrmmcrc9:a1 delik- o2Te9al �h? Th -_ a -tap Z. he number o emolo_yees w.itich can be expected ir,�FS a develapmen.t off know rn, si. e. This f] QLrre .varies b the. type :aL cominer- cial use Lyaiohouses :Ear instance_ +gill have fewer workes.X than a re +_all c_mn� anti by legion,. (Matte: If the square feen ,, of bu,a,l,c -Ana srs a is not knaUn.., the acre�;!ge can he multiplied by a floor soveraae �, atio, to dvtgrm ne the nmber of square 'feet of building saace f,, ar : a s.te ) � 2? What is the fam!A.L shG of the a -eraoP worker -bra this type os facility? Sint^ some 'tYDes of businesses attract workers of xj!r-t;,n_M aQaQ Land since this a,&* n� Workers in general can�"-VarY' region), this f3,atir is difiere �t for various i usinnesaes and various regii ns. The purpose of this figure is to estab:Iish the number,' of students an aveelfa4e snrker will have at hams. 37 What is the split bet�ween"alemi?t. 9ry and hhisxh school Students in these homes? AP noted above, samr_s tVines of f US98 aZttraci al.tder wor�CLrs�_ . who H,tE more likely to :have high school -age s_tudentm at home. :chile others attract,_ younerc ?r empiUVees, who are likely to have families predominated by school students. This figgure, IS used_ to allocate the total s:sdentr, into the ELC92er cataa-rsries. 49 Nov' man ag_w workers who do not love within a s`choal i district will relocate from other areas into the district? This;iigure further eliminates Student_ from the "commercial impact pool." since students os workers' who move into and lave it a school cfiatrict will be counted in residential impact figures. In she case o2 the Font:.ill H2!Agvard SAeCific. Plan . this fiaura reaognIzes,'chat same or the workers`vho obtain new lobs s ated :cn the s_ fully area will also live the the . school districts. I 5) Qs nnw lobar created, how many "ill be taken by existiaa I resa.dsnts? This figure recngnazes £h am. ss a worker J alr+aady has has Sr her students enro7.Ted is t:ho .1oae�'_ school district, tB� Ltav+_e already been cour'tE not trul arti im2acr,� ag� comt6erciai develas,ment_, 1 vp 1 f� � r' IV -Ii-G 8—/7 SCHOOLS r 6) 0f those persons who..work but do net live in a sciooi districts how maw will enroll their students in° the` V , k• district in whic)they Work? The svm Of these figures can provide a reasonaba " accurate estimate of the number of new students who will be generated izz an increase in employ ert'yithin a school di.stri:ct as the result of a commercial development. According to elementary schoaX districts,serving the city, a f gur% of 0.46 students per -employ-se is used to determine the impact of commercial de` Vvelopmeniis. This figure is based on ' performed b demographic studies y the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. (The reador may wish to note that this figure indicates that commercta_, devtalopments will generate more tudents than residential development. For ilstance, a one -at;re commercial development, . co_structed . at a floor -to -area rats, of 0.40 and staffed at ,a rate of four employees per 1,000 sy-Aare s feet, would employe, apprci�cimately 70 persons and generate 32 students. By comparison, the same one -acre site, developed with residential units at a density of 24 units per acre, would result in the generation of approximately 15 students f according to residential, student generation figures discussed below+. ` r AOL A review of'Ae mgthos[q.o_gy used in the CTUHSD study reveals that the 0.46 elementary students- per- emplayee figure, while correct for the prover use; can not be accurately apolled to the .� F�)cthxll Boulevard study area. Ti.ere are three primary 'reasons " for this: 1) the 0.46 students fi uxe is an unweighted average of seven employment categories, of wi inch only four apply to the proposed sgecific plan, 2) thir, figure does not exclude students of workers who will move into the local school districts, 3) this _ figure does not exsl•ude persons already live in the area who work in the districts but live elsewhere ant! enroll "their students where they live. The sscond ca &gory above -- students of workers who will move into the local school dxetrict after finding employment there- - �csan be characterized as an indirect impact. That is, these students will be generated bp, residentxal development (since they will live within the district), but the addition of new commercial growth will indirectly generate demand for housing. These impacts are counted as residential L_sr ae cts -and are mitigable through fees, etc., charged for each new dwelling unit, To obtain a more accurate esAmete of GS±Mg sjal elementary atu42hlt gt;rerati�n�_ information contained in the CJt:HSD study was comtjxned wxt•h gthe•r research information, as follovat } IV -Ii-G 8—/7 W" ' au:: rr SCHOOLS i. WRL(Iht-ld As noted above, the 0.46-elementary-students-p r-em- plove,it figure was based on an unweighteg average of the students -per- employee gigRres, for seven Z --p_m loyme rate-. _ c(ories (as shown in Table 4 q�± the CZUHSD study, in the sppendlces to this. addendum). _ The ;L�uxss' n the CJUHSD study were tjgsqd an surveys of bZTmIriessea in the local area and can be expected to be reasonably accurate. To obtain a more acgur.atg estimate-, acreages in the four categories which epply—to the Foothill'Bouleyard Soeci- fic Plan (Office, RotAll. Tranamortati-onICommunicAtione/Utt- lity, and Light jagaa&ryL wer-ti, G ',nbinod with the students- per-en.1210yee figures RhoEn in r'CJUH SD study to a weighted average of 0.35 ;�tuj;7_' fper,emgImpee for the study area as a whole. should bt'.--7 Lt . 1<:�ted that this: figure will be lower if warehousing -type uses are estahlished in the areas designated for _1,4_4bt Industry in the Foothill Boule- vat Specific Plan since this -2y - of jis Ver low pg has g� )7 students - per - employee figure. a. gji �Insti of Double- Counting:, As dlscusacl earlier, an important step in the assessment of commercl.al. schools impacts is the elimination of "doiahle-countipq.!, of students whose parents_ live and work within the same school district. The 0.35 students-per- employee average for the study area therefore represents the total number of students of area jEar-k rz and does not exclude reslden,.t students already qoui,`td in assessments 2-f- resldentlal impacts. As noted, students S_ar-'be excluded in three steps: 111 those whose 'parents will move into the local district after obtaining . a. lob there, 2) those whose parents a.--.eady , live, Sr work in the district and now have their students educated locally, and 3) those whose parents work but do not live in the district and will Ic-ave their children 7. schools near ]their homes. To ;3erfa m qtg» *1, an average rate of relocatit,'Nn of 35 percent war. used, �= Indicated In demographic., research Precared for the ca.ty gLi Ontario. 7°hat ism it 11 be expea- ted that RRoroximately 35 P-qi:cent of the persons, /who obtain., new lobs created as thw, result gf. t_4e Foothill Boulevard Specific, Plan will', > move int:6 the area.. and will thus represent residential, rather th;�n comTrIq:t'c.Ial Immacts. As discussed above, this' is an Lin7:Lr g -ct counted and MA�&-'-UqA—ted as a direct r--Lmi6ent=rg;l impact. A f, SCHOOLS a Ste! #2 Ran 6e performed usirL an average res3dency rate, cf. 36 percent, as indicated i:,m.. The Research Network, f4 which prepared the QHSD study. This figure indicates that 36 percent of the students ci parents already w_orkina, xn tte I district have been counteq in assessments e° "'residentiaV iN_pacts. For Slog # no information is available for local cord bons. v —ev4r• & conservative estimate of 55 percent '. was used. That ice,. it Was estimated for the purposes of this addendum that half 01 those p_ersans who work but do not live in the district and w311 not moves into the district will choose to enroll thCir student, locally. To illustrate this process, 3 "- hypothetical office development which will employ 1,000 persons can be used. £: Based on the students- •per- employee figure ,.shown in the CSUHSD study_ this tusiness would be expected to genc+rate appraxvmately 360 studenk3 it, 000 x 0.36 ?. However many of IL students can be eliminated. ac shown on the following a e. SAHPL g STUDENT GERERATION CALQVLATIOK s ° Basis Estimate! 360 Total Students of Workers Minus 35 Percent to ",-Ref lect Persons Who Will Move Into Local Districts: +•= -126 Students ! s 234 Students Suhtctal Minus 36 Percent `_o Reflect Persons Who Already L:ve In Local Districts:s_ :.84 Students 15Q Students Subtotal Minus 50 Percent to Reflect Persons Who Lies Elsewhare and Wilt Enroll Students Outside the Area- _ 75 Students 75 Tot` al New Students 1� This is an indir e_t commercial imna ^t. 2. This � ;4E a direct residential impact. IV-H -3 SC=HOOLS - Z. k t 7 : Thu§. as hown, ±--h _e hhXlgothetical office develooment, w w, old oxtuce anProxima <telz i5 Sludertts, based on a.engeratio.n rates and exc3lmd1.na Mdauble- csountedR st,udents. 3. .L Feet Fer Eanlavee y Based on fiqure4 conta=ined in the. CJJUHSD Utudv and acreages tar land vases in the proposed, imecifi.c plan, a_ weighted average square Feet- nor emnleyre. inure Wad calcu- lated.- lated. This calculata.on k&e.1 d an'J evera`tPe.; 0 '�1 square feet p2r' emplovee fa: the shut[v area -as a whole,., or 4�7 emnlovees per 1.000 sauair fee±^ r,L iV ee- R*! dential Student Generation. Residential developments are generally the primary source os students within a school di?Jtrict ; (although, as dir;aus'sed above, figures' used by the districts indicate that commercial developments generate more students per acre than "resi dent ial deve- ','opments). In general, F� student generation by residential developments is based on his k _- oricyl data for various types of vesidelattal development. For instance, smaller housing types, such as one- bedroom apartments, a.; \ are generally fr~und to generate fever students per ufiit than single- family hiJ es, which are more likely to be lived in by families with children. 1 1- The Etiaanda sch distrio the 't uses a figure of 0.60 students Per unit to determine the total number of student S'enerated by a residential development. The Central School Di rict uses an average generation figure of 0.35 students per unit. Chaffey Joint Unign High 3ohooly District` uses z figure of 0. 15 students per dwellirg unit. (j tit. Existing Student Generatipp. Based on the student generat�bn figures shown above and tt,p survey of existing', developed, land uses„ existing residential student generation is shown in Table- ,IV - -H /C, below. IV �I -9 lJ..A SCHOOLS i i Ir TABLE !V-H /C EXISTING STUDY AREA STUDEDif , 7WJ4r" TION Dwelling ,1 !f Vnitsl a•tudents Land Use 'Gyps Acres = Eiriployeesl Generated Residential K -8: 121.8 975 369 Higi;, School: 146 Transportations Retail t>rdmmereialf Entertainment 445.22. -S8a 9SA --- -- -- -- - -- - - it Nctes for Table Iii -H /C: 1. For residential ar,/kas, an average factor of eight dwelling units per acre was used to determine total units. For commercial, existing development as identified in the July 1986 land use survey was used; employment was estimated at four employF_s per 1..000 s:gtiare feet. Commercial student gene-ation is based on generation factors used by the districts. ------------------------------ It shorld be noted that trc existing student generation above assumes that- 4} all cosigns employed within the study area choese to enroll thei`�, children in one of the districts serving the study area; 2+ all persons employed witKin the study area }ire outside the `attendance areas of the four school districts.- and 3} that the eatimaited stq:�ent generation figures suppised by the mchinel districts ars accurater The numbers shown %n Table IV -ails are •hus 4skely higl"er than is actually the case; since: 4l the figures probably include sdanble- counting' of stur'4nts generated by parents who live within the attendance areas of the school dtatricts- and work aithxn the study areas and 23 not all persons who aerk within the study are& but live else- where will choose to enroll thetr children in !kcal schools. To de termine the ^umber (�i sta:deri ;s currently being directly generated by existing, emPlayment- generating uses it thin the study area, the Calculations described earlier were applied_ to the aParaximately 41.500 square feet of pffice uses and 473.500 square feet of retail us<s identifies?, in the 1986 land use survey oerformed for the proposed Uroiect. aased on these acreage figures, and using weighted average square- feet- oer- emoloyee and studsnts - oer -_moirvee fx ures_ for these uses as shown in the i IV-H-10 �� - 6 —1 {� r a SCHOOLS AnL r CJUHGD stud study area a laXment- generat. ins, uses rurrentLV '� tea.. directs produce a2uruximately, 225 gtudents., It should be noted that, v oe existing obs can not b considered to attj:act n, parso�is trhe ol+y; the 35 pera ;kit_ factor "move -in" factor shown; above ua�J'not subtoted cram to l student generation. 3. Project Impacts s` The need fox school facilities generated within the study area will tncrease upon development oi' the proposed project, due to the construction of near commercial and residential, develoo- `` ment. Impacts of these types of development are discussed separately below. Pesidential: student ceneration which would t, result i£ the proposed specific plan were not approved is also discussed below. r. ar eammerciai DeveAapement Tmpacter Aft nested;' shove; Commercial templcsyment-gercerattne�� development in eonsided to xmpaat schools since parents may enroll their children iin ;.•lhe school dzatrict in which they wmrkr eommereiai deae3ep,heot tmpeats of the proposed projectf hazed are the .factor cf 9.-46 stddents per rmployee`'aci , d by the districts are shewn in Table 1 helour i t "eAHLE I0 14 EhepmeNT- RELATBH *Hawed an Hr46 Students per Emplayea+ c tide ats ' Development Type dares, Employowes* ,Generated w�swwrwwArwwwr ,YSwwwwwwwwwr..arrw� wwwawwrswa ✓LMNwwww.r'saa w Eommereiai Retail 269. -9 Is sie S;-6S2 4* Of£iee Sang 46rS92 3; i79 Eight lnduotrsal S5r2 96l 44a^, -- -- -- -- - -- .'. Total Students: 42;261 ?xisting. Employment- ; �- Related Student 6Pnerotton: 969 Totai Increase: ilr364 r. ----------------- - - -- -- ` " - �ea--ivr• T- sirl.e• iii -E�tA: � lr Employee figures based an lot coverage of 4e pereentr For commercial and Officer employment generation of four employees per #x989 square feet of building space vas uasd: Industrial employment generation assumes one employee per ir9ee square £ertr All figures are jvorst case* and,,ansume ? redevajopment of all exiatsnq eomrereial areas to maximum intensityr i -- - --- - -- -- - - --- -- - -- -- It shalld be noted that the total emplq:pmrnt- related student generation shown in Table Il: -Hf8 aaanmea,., *hat i+ all persons living rithir. the study area vfll enroll their atudenta in for „al schoolsr 2l all new study area employees will relocate from other arzaa; 33 all persona racking within the; study area but lzvsng elsewhere choose to enroll their students in lCCal school dim- j trieta,- and 4l all s;ndeveloped or underutilized areas rill be developed to their maximum intensity- Since' -all of these canhot be assumed to be truer the impacts zho*. 4 in Tabie Iv-Hf9 can be assumed to represent a ■carat ease* acenartar setaal projeet- i rotated student generation will most likely be lever: All study area school distrxatar as noted earlierr are operating in excess of their planned capacitieac Additional studenta generated by employment uses will add to existing feeslitxes shartages.- All new commerefal ones rill be subject to the schools impact fees charged'-`by the three school a strzetsr IV -H -12 3erera Cian fo5 t � pro aose i rli ec� wa.s c8lcula., I To determlb- the numMticrr G emaBoineesz an avemat ,wild._ i Q coverage, ratio o ' -44 sr^as a 3 ed to the apa�aY�o.cimatelm 432 acr =s within the s�tu s. I �(enroi pad ,' a :2mOltaym n't uses f a th.aw4Fti _ this (inure meat 'likely n rer 't s ai itual rronstrudtt:LQn= ; Usind this figure, a teatal - r ras>,imatsly 7..5 gati.l on sgua t° feet' of emnlovmect 411"1, ehjrr3t xithir,, tie stuCO V area at ,. buzldout." Thms, 7fi ure N �usia c- weia.5 d averaxge ' of 4 -1 emolov 9� per QOc5u i� feet. {Melds an' "eatimast,ed a5 25 ?moYaye�� within the stud.- ax, -4a.. The total nu*ber of students generated these workers crap be determined by anal -_rag the jMa-�htgd, averaa.e of 0.35 students per emploveie. This flcure itidi,3utes that the, maximum 35,395 workers will have app ox35natelz S?, C?W scla:esal -awed char- To eliminate douts`��- counting, the ca?mulations showi...,,."arlier were used to'eli-n3nate` those students who wi.}.1 evesrtually live r within the district and those whose "parentM.WIIl mat enral then In local sahools. This figure indioactes that a total ' a2onrrximately 3, 5'75 students wili b# directly generated commercial uses in the fipotbill Bortlevard 8pe6ifid. Plan area. Of these, approximately 2,1350 will be now students who have : pat been accounted for in estitriates of residential, arawth or in' exist; ng ? enrollments, Calculations used to r'eld commercial student generation, are shown an the follavincr riaae. l( J .a._4" r§ a a CorGmer:..�..ea��. Student , Ctii+nersi+i�l.:csri„ r.is� ,the C Cir met sodoloaar das'ov _��' era i3er '- ;ester imated commere'a ��sEud +A SCHOOLS n t= TABLE TV -H %D COMMERCIAL STUDENT IMPACT C.,LCULATIONS 1 Item Number "' # Total A-- of Commerc3 art land: Square fleet ai 9u lc nas Per Acre (40 Percent x° Gover,a� 17,424 '* Total Square Feet of Employ- ment Uses: 7, 530, 000 i;. Total' Employees. 35,395 24.7,11,000 SF)' Total Students- 12,384 ` CO.35 per Employee Minus 35 Percent 12,384 for Persons Movina - 4,334 into,Diatrict: � 3,050 j Minus 35 PQrcertt, for Persons Who 8.050 Already Live i,_n _ 2,900 Local Districts- 5,150 " i Minus. 5t arcent -tE� J Refir,.ct Persons Who Live Elssvhere and 5,150 Will Enroll Student - 2,575 Outside the Area:. i 2,575 ---------- TOTAL DIRECT STUDENT IMPACT: X575 5 _ Square Feet \ ------------------------------ t�¢ i r SCHOOLS ' oomroarsson. the anproximalely 222 ac�as wit�oxn the stud,« area which awe cur'�rently -zoned fe+r a6mmerrciaf develcopment would 'S generate' aayra,cimately �.OSt] more elementary students than are a, naw produced !..coas:meroisl uses in the' study area, once all aua lablR land 'waaz de eloped. A fatal of ao.oroxi %Ately 1. X75 students would be gtaherated itth -1- the study area it the ;ryg osed proae_et were gj2sent took elacg tinder existing -onina cateptirgem. (This iioure is bas4ed o_n devel.00ment of commercially iorredA land at a m3xtuxae of office to `rrlaill eeuivalent fj try e3Cdst�u1'd�.'ve— la,�ma -ze�t and at a floor - Ito -area of 0.9(1:1. Em, 1. o, ees< d r-st auarr -foot and studen�`.s- par- eucnlovee ratios are aaarae an weii }ated a'verace� r.erzved fx csm the GJIJ:itSD study 1 . —" Thus, the proposed Foothill'Botrievard Saec�fic Flan will increase the nwrtrgr of new elementary students directly O.Onerated tZ commercial uses at bulldout of the study area from /l,al �a. mately 1. 275 do a,pgo oximaLely 2. 350 tan incremesttal a -ase ' 1,075 elementary students), due Erim,artlu to an in the, amount of land de-si.gnga ted for emalavment- oenerat rag .use-A). r �r b. Residential Deve peter t Iwpacto. Ash- discussed above, two of the four school dis rlcts,,s"rving the city -- Central and Etiwanda- -have attendance areas' which - include residential portions of the study area. .-The Central School District includes subareas 1 -3; subarea 4 is within the Eetixanda School District. Student generation, based on student generation figures supplied by the ,districts, is shown in Table IV -H /E, below. TABLE IV -H /E RESIDENTIAL DEVE.LOPMEM`;� RELATED STUDENT GENERATION K -8 Increase Total Housing Students Compared. to School Di :ntrir_t Units, Generated ^ :isti ', j Central 2,184 764 430 Etiwanda .^_59 295 252 Chatfey JUHSD 2,443 566 220 1. total housing units based on proposed specific plan land use categories. All dwelling unit yields assume buildout at maximum allovable density, - and thus represent `vorst case' condition . ,J IV-H-15 } l :_6 ' 1 SCHOOLS' u' o r' S f As' a'tovn inpTable 1 -q/e# this number of students generatpc -- vitnin. the stud atwa will increase as development in gpcorda`tf�� with the proposed'rlspeclfia plan proceeds. Since the proposed project includes less residential Land than iS included in the the existing city of Rancho Cucamonga g:esaerai '„`loll designations for the study area., ultimate residential student generationckill be Tower than that vhiLch could penult if the proposed project were not approved. However, toj_si sttudent g"ermtian. based on commeresaxl generattaa rates anpp}zed by th4 school dmstrr -tz,- wfil increase: ,As noted aboW,e, . both the Central 4;nd Etivanda school districts currently have student enrollments in 'excess of their design capacitl*s. The proposed project will add to the existing )shortage of school: fadil ties. and may - 7reato facilities shortages. based on projected commercial - related student generation talthough construction of new developments could be dependent upon availability of scf-,00l facilities). Both the Central and Etivanda school. `districts currently assess residential development at a fee of sl.03 pe •square foot; the Chaffey 7UHSD aharge:s a fee of 60.47 per square foot. All study area residential development will br subject .p those fees, c. No Project " _Residential Impacts, As discussed in Qhapteri;,V of this report, the "No Project* scenario assumes that tfio sti:dy area is developed according to existing lard use designations. Under this scenario, which assumed that the proposed project is not approved, approximately 2,850 residential units cculd be constructed within the:__study area of all residential areas are built to maximum allowable densities). Thus, the proposed project wi'.l result in a reduction of approximately 400 study area residential dwelling units _(15 percent) - -and a reduction of approximately 240 element; ry stu- dents and 60 high school students -- compared to the `x,,mber of students who would be generated if the study area de veloped according -to existing general plan des- L6hations. d. Indirect Impacts. Since, as discussed earlier, employment-generating `uses are considerei to generate demand for school facilities, the proposed project may impact two additional,; ,districts serving the city - -the Alta Loma and Cucamonga :school districts - -if increased in ehsity of use within the study area enc= urages development of new commercial uses within those districts. I U, �M 1 SCHOOLS 4. Mitigation ![ensures The following measures are proposed to mi-;sgate Schools impacts of the proposed project: -- All'''resid @ntial and commercial developments within the study area shall pay the legally established schools impact fees to the elementary and high school districts in effect at the tlme`ef development. 5. Analysis of Signillcance 7 The Praia ed project will result in an increase in the numher,�^� students generated within the study area, as the result of both increased commercial and residential development. Ai`cor -'ing to figures supplied by the school districts, commercial deo:elopment will result in an increase of approximately Ciireue 2,350 studea.s, compared, I to existing levels. Residential devel- o,lment will result in an`:1zncrease of approximately ,1,000 stu- dents, compared to exista.nd levels. iiltimete commercial - relate student generation will 4,z creaser based on student generation figures used by the dxs- trsctzr stnee total comweresa3 screege w =l# increase ender the proposed project:. The inmremental increase in students` directly generated by commercial uses will be approximately 1,075 students, compared to the number of elementary students which vauld be generated the study area if development took place according to existing coning designations. Ultimate residential student generation will be approxi- mately 45 percent lower;vhan levels vbich would result if the proposed project were not approved and the study area developed according to existing general plan designations. Overall, inc-uding residential development - related students, the proposed Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan will result in the enrollment in local school districts of approximately 800 more students then would occur if the study area developed accorTn to existing =oning designations. As noted above, this is due to an increase_,in the amount of commercially designated land under the proposed specific 1p an. Increases in; the number of students will worsen existing fscilNtias shortages in all city of Rancho Cucamonga schc•r *l j.% IV -H -17 I . K districts send exe�ate a shprt��e ekf facilxt:iesr -,�f scheo3:a „m p sots � <, fees for "v deve10094WAt :axe +Lot sufficient to provide fox^ ' the ca1� tructian eX , #ft� luxes. Dc- velopmnt of some uses colad � be�i delaye,'l i., school. facj.lities -are not abiae to f serve neK students. �M � ii 73 �s _ � t PROJECT ALTERNATIVES F. ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY ALIGHHEHTS This section discusses alternative roadway %lilllgnment scena- r1os contained in the proposed specific plan for various loca- tions: within the stugty area. Each alternative ref1scts a different solution to Varrinua cirnulati.on system deficiencies or other problems which exist wtthin the atudy arena. Each alter- native is expected,; to be capable of solving sole gjm of these problems, although each also inb.ivoa ditferi*:g secondary impacts resulting tram Implementation. It should tsf, kk noted that it is the intent of this section to examine these alternative raadvay layouts only; ro recommendation regarding any alternative is intended. Alternative roadway align 'ipnts for varic<us locations ws.thin the study area are discussed: #.elaw: 5. Rod Hill Re lignment As discussed in the propors2d specific plan, Red Nils. Awenuo Country ,lub Drive (subare 1) currentle intersects Foothill Boulevard at an a*kward angle {approximately 30 degrees), resulting in awk,iard ttrrning motIrnns for vehicles entering and leaving Foothill Boulevard at this location. Due to ,his condi- tion, it was determined -by the City that Red Hill *venue Countxyr Club Drive will be realigned to provide eater operation. Two gne alternative realignme'"t. scenarios were was prepared (-see figure V -F -4-16 Ser an flluatratfan of Red N13�t Avenue slter"tivea*r and 3f. _ ',,rstrated in F'aure V -FJ1. It shauld bg noted tL;&+_ tva other realignment. scenarios were examined cloning the I rma:3cn ai thv pr posed project., These scenarios vcuid trc.ve.involved realigning Red Hill to meet the existing intersection of Sark Ai rn.crdina Road and Foothill aculevard. Fowever. i+ vas zfaterm ingd' :th_st xes�li.gnines R— Ni3.Z to this �fc3.i would invalve either sutztantlal imaacts to the Sycamore Inn., an identified historical structurec or si ,Snificunt grading of the Redd Hill itself. which is an identified. significant landmark IE.i,thir�, tho city, xhs- veto._ these Alternatives were dismissed an- in£esIs?hle and were not included :far consideration In be ra geed clan. S3miia ]Y, asxather alternative which yould have realioned Red Hill eauntry Club ri-Me to intersect Foothill Boulevard amt S.90-degree uncle was eliminated due to so,tenyial impacts an adjacent properties. V -'F -i. ■ €a ; ,1\ r PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ' or Right -Angle Intersect *onr Thin a fern -rtive Involves a real Ign;';nt of Red Hz }3: Avenue to provide a right- Ang{ke_ intersection ":pproxtmately 556 feet east of the existing int;►r &eetionr .The portion of Rest Hill Avrn`ee which j'!curr_ #-.ntly intersects with Foothill Boule�'*rd would be vacagtedr This alternative vouid Involve the dedication to,-' r or purchase by, the Sity of, one or more parcels located on Footb,il,.- Boulevard in thn prop R * Hill alignment: Any structures on these parcels ±would be remrJd: Since Red Hill. Avenue would be 'reallanedr nam levels on :4djaaent parcels would increase; since these sites are presently adfacens ;.only t4 Foothill Boulevnrdc j br Extond ;*o Grove Avenuer This alternative would involve extending Red !hUl Avenue to connect with Grove Avenuear Under, this sltornativer the portion of Red HIMz .Avenue which currently- connects Pith Foothill Boulevard would to vacata,Or As "wish the zzutherly extension alternative, th&s scenario would involve the purchase or dedication or parcels along the new alignment; noise levels parcel,'? along the new alignment and not currently adjacent to Red Hill Avenue would increase; Since this alternative would not create an Intersection 9ith Foothill Boulevard; and would remelt in the elimination of the existing Red Hill Avenue intersec'.. -x,anr traffic impacts on 'Foot- hill Boulevard would be reduced; although Grove Avenue +and -its intersection with Foothill Boulevard+ would experience' higher levels of traiff -,- possibly resulting in congiestionr As discussed above, i M realianment alternattvs'sis examinecC in the procosed specific rr� an. Th1Ls alignment ,(see Figure V -F -1) would involve extending Red Hill Country. Cluj2L Drive to connect with Grave Avenue_ , The portion of Red Hill Country, C10:! ' Drive which currently connects with Fog ?hill Boulevrd would be vacated.. ri This scenario vould involve the purchase or dedication or parcels glto the nev alignments noise levels for Rarcels along the new alignment and .lot currently adjacent to Red Hill Country Club Drive would increase, although noise levels produced by traffic on the .roadvav would decrease, since ultimate traffic volumes would be decreased (see below). Since thi-a alternative would not create an intersect#.o_n with Foothill Boulevard, ar<d would result :,:n the elimination of 'the exi.stina Red NiXI Country Club Drive intersectiaeL`' traffic impacts,on Foothill Boulevard would be reduced. V -F -3 YJ„ PROJECT ALTERNATIVES v. s l` i` Accordi.:�g to, 'the Giti; of Rancho "Cucamona,a enaineerirlg d�artment. *stlsts ing. - trafflm .levels on Red..-';S#yi.l3: try Club . � Drive tags meal tri-d Sri .T;s�ly. 1 87) are aptisroximately 4,000 ,ADT; the ma jority -nf th .se .tri,ns.. acc..J d trfa morn:ina fed Mill Countr -Y Club br3ue is utise±� `1 commuter as a silhK%X tout td' x oi4E boumd r ti Foothill Boulevard Since r..ealian.ing. Betel H3.11 Cau�str4 Club Drive r to Grow, a Avenue uouYLdd ellminart:e its use as a shortami traffic 11 levels a_ 4 `nro3.etitbtd to `ham. E-OAUced to a mrox;&m&t,ely 2.M -2. 500 A _ QT_. 11 the cx3;stlmg. alignment Is rg tained. trafiaa levels Mould ti remain at existing levels or drojit sli h� t3v two-,pprogimatelSt 3. 500 AQT. L Greg, ve Avenue, vh ,ch th:e Q4 _t y of Rai* --%o Cucamo�aa intends to construct to a fonr -lane width between F Mill §oulevar.d and the intgrsection with Red) - kt11.I YSountry, Club .rive will be adeauate,J to accommodate ra ,at d flows. T.ie intersections of Rod frill Country Club Drive, with eithe-,Grave Avenue or Foothill Boulevard C would be caoable i�t iaaeidlin s projected trafilc volumes withaut scionalization. . r., it should hte noted that the reAlignment described to this 4ag.rit+nt gnd the nronosed specific plan is conceptual only. The act, ua:' roiatina•. oii the roarlwal, inclu.d3na. the horixnta.l and vertical alignment of the roadway and it intersection with Grove Lvenue. as well ag constra -ints of anv5 'Placed on adjacent pro ties b� the realionment, would be addreased=t the time the design of the roadway is prepared. 2. San Diego Avenue As shown in Figure `V -F /2, San Diego. Avenue currently provides access between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road in the western portion of Subarea 2. As shown in- Figure V- F/2, San Diego Avenue provides sole access for only one parcel; all others can be accessed by Foothill Boulevard, Vineyard AV".ue, or, San Bern"Af rdino Road. Therefore, it was determined that this roadway may be t=acated or realigned. Alternately, this roadway may be left in ,.As existing .alignment. These alterna- ti:vea are discussed below% a. Shift Alignment ii,o Wont. Linder this scenario, Son Diego Avenue would be Shifted�;.approximately 90,1eet to the vest, towards the flood control channel. the existing connectSon between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road would remain, in place. PRO3ECT ALTERfiaST7 $ �., FIGURE Vt i' 2s,. aAf( DIEGO 4VEUUE L x. 'l5 . : a � OTECT ALtZONArxvis Retention of ,the existing connection between Foot;}a,�44 Boulevard -.arid San B;er��ardino Road mould r "�ult in �ontivoed traffic impacts resul�4n9 from the close -proximity oX the inte'f - sections of San Diego and Vineyard avenues with Foothill Bou,l.e- yard, primarily dirz-Uptions. inn ,traffic #lo related t turning . motions of vehicles accessing Foothi..19 FouA vfird from Zan Die' a Avenue and vice versa. In addition, retention of San Diego .Aus� -nue ran its existing alignment could result in traiiie impacts to the' Intersection of y San Bernardino Road and Vineyard Avenue sAs congestion at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard ''`.aaj! Vineyard increases; motorists may useOSan Diego Avenue /San Zetrnardino Road aa' an alternate east -vest route to avoid congestion on Foothill Boulevard. This alterrative vould also reduce the e-.cist.ind unusable land vest of San Dlego`__Avenu:e, since the exlsting roadway alignment of ectiveir reduces to 90: #'ztet the depth of the developable land adjac,etlt to the flood caArol channel. b. Eliminaate Foothill -to -San Bernardino Connection. Under this scenario, the alignment of San: Diego Aveenue would be changed to eliminate the existing connection between 'San Bernar ding Road and Foothill Boulevard. Thlu could be achieved by either leaving the existing San Diego Avenue /Foothill Boulevard Intersection ir,place and 'realigning the northern portion of San Diego Avenue, or by eliminating the Foothill Boulevard Intersec- tion and realigning the southern portion of San Diego Avenue. Removal of the existirq connection between San Diego Avenue and Foothill Boulevard would eliminate the potentia,� for tae of theI {San Diego Avenue /San Bernardino Road route as an alternate to Foot'hIll Boulevard, xeducing congestion alolg these roadways. Impacts related to traffic levels-- primaiv ly noise -- would be reduced---,on parcels adjacent to this route. -11 the existing San Diego Avenue/Foothill Boulevard inter- i section were retained, the existing potential for traffic conflicts related to the location of this intersection in rela- tion to Vineyard Avenue would be eliminated, although access to at least one existing parcel would be removed. rk., s " R(3JiE ^T AL�"JSRH•ATry ij�t n �h�`}et tern;n sine , "for Shia roadway '004: 3t ��s�� #fie 3* ova ' g . J Fstac'a \a Co, u ,,,,,rt Is an mast w ^es roadway riarA M. " ° "Fxoothili " ' Boulevard a� \d sour o San bernardano 'Roar3. T e tea�na avlesw= or A. this` r aacFbf� concon��st. �f tvc iriethosis of taroiidi�a� a nc•i}a- south „' csnn ctiaan b�tw:een EstFS ia,Gourt;. San; Seaai�ard�1o.`Road,. •a, +rrd•.toot° hill Bovtliwar,t_ 'rvo alt rx�ative were e),,amIned: 1) a roadway Y?ea.11gnment to provide for a prt,ia<te roadway providing: a limited eonncsaon between San Eernariiino ?oad and Foothill Boulevard, and h 2) construction of Estacia Court as a dedicated public roadway 'connecting San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard.' Under the 014,mited access alternative, only residentia, development served by Estacla C,,3urz, would be prcj �lded vita accesu between Foothill Boulevard. Commercial uses sex-void by Estacia would have access to Foothill Boulevard. only. This ,alternative was draped ,in response to the concerns of residjmts., on San Bernardino RL-ad, who indicated their desire to limit traffic on that roadway: In general, the provision of only limited access I would reduce the traffic and noise impacts which would result if -tsta cia Court were constructed to provide unrestricted access between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Avenue. As discussed ' earlier regarding San Diego Avenue, motorists could use San Bernardino _Avenue as an alternate east -west route as,: congestion on t_'oothill Boulevard increases. Provision of only limited access to San Bernardino Avenue woul;l reduce the opportunity :for Its use as an alternate route. 4 L ' = t` Y- ,a ,.. .... _ _+•.�,.L. . _...�d61;�., *,.F4,, w.e _,a u3, _,.... w.. .q ....... L"�;w: a'k`u rr 77, PP k ,. CITY OF UPLAN L M • ?'. f + id 4oti No. 48r Hd Ave �. Box6ik Upland, CalifbmJk 91788 ' (714) 4XI -t35 : w.. ''•=1 ZS June 1987 CCfx PLARNMG DWiSt011 MO NGR a� Mr. Otto Kroutil JUN :4,1131 City of Rancho_ Cucamonga p ^;, 9320 Baseline `Road Agsyi101iiju�t! %l�itls ' Rancho Cucamonga, CA ?.97701 Dear Mr. Kroutil, n . REF: FOOTHILL BLVD SPECIFIC PLAN DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The City's Planning and Engineering Departments have reviewed the draft environs me,5tal impact report (D.E.I.R.) for the Foothill 9 vd. Specific Plan. Comments on the D.E.I.R. are as follows: i• Section IV -D faits to address the constraints imposed on d velopment of property at the northeast corner of Foothill Blvd. and Grove, Avenue as a result of the realignment of Rad Hill nvive. Z. Section IV -0 -19 fails to address the noise impacts on adjacent residential ar2;�s created by introducing a new street intersection into Upland at Red Ail U Drive and Grove Avenue. A detailed noise study with mitigation mea- sures should be provided in the "D.E.i.R. speQifically addressing phis issue. f: -;3. Section IV -D -22 fails to provide specific noise M,iigation measures for the rerouting of Red Hill Drive to Grove Avenue. - 4,. Section IV -F -I requires a more detailed traffic analysis of the two alterna- tives considered for alignment of Re¢;Hill Drive. Both alternatives will impact adjoining properties. The analysis should include: A. Addressing a third scenario which will be "no project." B. Discussion of the existing and future (projected) traffic volumes on Red Hill Drive. C. Discussion of the need for traffic signals in each scenario, �. Discussion of the capacity at each intersection in each scenario. c �' _, .. , .. , ,.,v �, � �,., .�,�,.:, ,�., in ��,../ a. �:,- :,•.� .� . w T�� i I Mr. Otta' Klrao Ii i+ �,. Page 2 Addresgs ing <tk hortzon�t al and vertical align I,r Grove Avenue;. f � nar�o i l i iri gowlble adverse vertical street alignment �ac�rlg � 1 i,m %ted s�gfit. disCtandde_ '� F. Discussion whether'illie street wi'i be reelassii� ed? S. The D E.1.R fails to propose or a aluate other R means for the rerouting,or�realignmen. of Red'Hiil Drive in SeCtionpVSF?IrY y We would also 1ke to take this opportunity to reiterate a previous comment that there is significant concern- with the adverse noise and traffic safetjDjmpaets of introducing, a new collectai \,sltreet into an established Upland neighborhood. . ¢ -, Although some exftLIrg,' impacts on Foothill Blvd, world be a�2eviatad, sew' and far more, severe impacts would be created on Grove 'Avenue,and its vicinity. The City of Upland wouid> therefore If�a to indicate 4ts disaQarova:l of the realign- ment of Rey. Hill Drive to Grove Avenue. ` Should you have any ques:sions regarding this, matter, please contact me at (714) (fir ' 982 -1352, ext. 252,; Sincer ly;; t , 1 :' J hn O. Atwater, Associate Planner pland-Planning Department 3h 0 .State of Galifarala To ttatw .(iearinghouse Office of Planning & Research 1400 lath Street Sacramento, CA 95814' Attention Peggy Osborn From ChPAFTMEW OF TRANSt OXTATION District 8 r; Tro :. spartation and Housing Agency oat* : Jui� 22, 198T File No.: 08- 38d-66 -4 1 ScH #87021615 --- fitECE1VED --° ctTY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION sub(ect: DEIR - Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan AM FA 7,80,10411,141 A8t41Et8 We have reviewL.a'the above- referenced document and req,est consideration of the following: 1. During construction within State right of way, any lane 1 closure and/or traffic control should be in compliance with State standards including advance warning signs and lane tapers. 2. Provide at least miningn sight distance for all vehicles entering and exiting al: all access locations. j 3. Provide sufficient vehicle storage in new left-turn pockets. 4. All new traffic signal onstallations, including: mt ficationa of existing signals, shall be financed by the develcr. ar. ' o The report does not address the primary pure. a of the State highway which is to allow the motorist to traacrse the ,.." "`C', facility with the least inconvenience and in a ,afe man o Traffic .ail be concentrated at the intersections sho nYthe conceptual plans so that any driver who desires entr `��= place on the opposite side of the street, relative t Ls z 31987, direction of travel, is forced to proceed to the nex �E n G section and make a "U" -turn in order to get to his �� '`_ �. -' destination. o Other concerns ar.i with planted medians which show trees ` lawn, etc. The trees shown will constitute a fixed object within 30' of the edge of traveled way and will, during younger stages of growth, obstruct the vision of the driver. Maintenance and watering will also add to problems for the driver. Workers in the median will be a distracting influ6vOe and watering could cause a wet pavement conditions during dry wa_Fther which is not anticipated by the ordinary driver. Thi could cause loss of control of the vehicle. Stste Glearrng�'io'�tis� - Atter. ,tign Peggy ,6.s'b.orn Page 2 June Z2, 1957 ' ,o "Enhanced" intersections showing paving blocks of unknown descripC4ion in a ciecular pattern, within a'. s..uare -� have not 'tom\ been accepted by, the State for use as a sit�ist; t:ut.e for ", 0;,-r present paving materials. Bollards con,&* tote fixad abj-t cts and would; ^be disallowed. r r �Caltrant sapports the realignment of ,Red 1,Hill kvenue t. Avenue am tip° ellim nation of the existing conaedtion cf San Diego Avenue to Foothill BOalevard, as -stated untie t Project AlternativeA. It is unclear as to ths,,intedt' off gJ'�e alternatives for Es °tae;ik _.Court. Estaeia Cou. t., is an east , west sheet as is San Bernardi r.-.p Read and Foothill Boule'ard. We would appreciate t�,e opportunity to review and comment on ,e proposed DEIR in order to evaluate possible impacts to the transportation system, particularly State Routes., 6b. Ne urge early and continuous liaison with Caltrans on proposed glans as they affect State high4ays. 1 If ;you h.—Fe any questions, pleas: contact .Marie J. Petry at (7? 10 383=4541. _. GUY a. VISBAI. \'\ Chef, Transportation Planning Branch A �1 rE MP:Ib ec- FDHusu Plan Coordination unit, AQTP File (2) 1 I ti. I LAN NING NIETVVM( mp-MORMDUM DATE: JiiLY is, 1�.j7 TO- ALAN WA�iRZN CITY OF!'AOCHO CUCAMONGA A Cl rf OF RANCtio, cucaMONGa ANNING DWISION Awl JUL 15 1987 FROM: ERIC NORRIS as. RESPONSES TO QI'ALTRANS AND CITY OF UPLAND COMMENTS ON WIAFT EXR (FIRST CIRCULATION) The EJ11owing are synopses of the responses to comments we will be Incorporating in the second circulated version of the nraft EIR for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 1. (Fails to address constra',ats 2. The extension of Red Hill Country Club Drive to Grove Avenue will be addressed at the time of development of the properties over which the realigned roadways are developed, since these properties will required access to Grove Avenue. Any constraints would be addressed as the design of the realigned roadway is preparf7d. Y� (Noise ImPacte jrx resident ', areas . . . Based on projected trlffic volumes; it is exp"." that noise impact gen^ra%,ed by the commercla:4 development 'Within the city of Uli.14:nd at the northwest corner of Grovt Avenue and Foothill Boulevard exceeds that which would be created by the or"003ed roadway realignment. Traffic volumes on Red Hill Country Club Drive will be reduced as the result of the Proposed realig 4ment; volumes, on Grove Avenue will be consistent with this roadway_ planned four-lane width. (Specific noise Mitigation measures Refer to responses to com.Ael, �ts I and 2. Hill country Qlub, Drive will decrease (re Noise lelyels on Red le-4�.Ls) as th,"'result of the realignment" ducing, noise, E P(0)t(I "rwgeMOM * Envimrim4wat StufAes Policy Analy-m - Land Planning ,x A Deftct 105�x M11A futlid. Ontario, CA qv, $z .0 �1 9,44 JIMUM ALAN 4k N JULY 15, 19 -87 PAGE 2 4. (More detailed analysis of two alternatives .1 The two alternatives sire; 1) realign to arove Avenue, 4knd 2) retain existing alignment. Second realignment alternative has been dropped. 4a. (Address third "No. Project" scenario .) w see No. 4. , Y 4b. (Discussi6n Of'existiag and projected traffic volumes . . .) Existing daily traffic an Red Hill country Club, dive is approximately 4,000 vehicles per dad;, based on r' ;`unts made during the last week. Accordinq to Paul a., thr majority �,-f this traffic is generated duriu6';Ither morning peak hour, when RHCCD is used as �) shor,Hcat to westbound Foothill Soulavard. Traffic volumes on RHCt;ff, -would drop to approximately`�2,ta0O- 2,500 ADT if the roadway were realigned to Grove Avenue. If the existing alignment were retained, volumes would drop" p slightly or remain the same (approximately 3,500 ADT), since t the eassting•morning ohortcut route would not be affected. 4c. (Need for traffic signals . . .) Based on projected traffic volumes, traffic signals will be needed under either alternative. 4d. (Capacity of intersectlon The capacity,-.,of the RHCCD intersection will be adequate for projected ti-4ffic volumes un&er either scenario. 4e. (Address horizontal am 4 vertical alignmeInt . .) The alignment of RKC`1:0will be addressed at the time the roadway is desiVned. A conceptual alignment only is shown In the Draft EZR. 4f. (Will the street be reclassified?) Although Grove Avenue is nct designated as a secondary artariaX, the into =zt`of the City of Rancho Guctmonga has been to develop the roadway to this width (two lanes in each` direction) north of Fu;xthill Boulevard. Half- width a AhAN WARRZK 'x j �!ILY 15"1 87 , PAGE 3 r. !: 1 ! " a imprcvemewt{s to move AVo,'Ve have a..rendy been constructed by the 01ty pUtipland_iu .a4�^txxectian with the ex3st!x�g . commercial deg ±.elo rant at diove crud roothill. Conctruction Of Grove. ven g to second ��y art+ I,arl stagdardn' woulid extend • north from F'otthill 'larzlevard to t'he<' realiganec� fiiiOCD Grave would revert, -,to a two- lane_roadway at that point. b. (Fails to address other .silternatiwe1 realignments Two alternative re ,Slig mRant-v of RHCCD wers %,*xanined during � khe Initial prepa 4tic of the SpecifYc Pan. There differant alternatives would have taken tw,<w sligrictl7 routes to realign the Foothill Soule!val.c. ,intersection of RHCCD r. ith San Serrm.rdlXo Fbad. However, these alternatives would haov existing 5ycamo Inn involved -ei er serious impacts to then reR (, or restaurant ratablishment of historical, significance} extensive *a��ing of Recd Hill, an identif3t�d visual resource _\ in the city, �..' \V Galt ^�,t9-Disttict 1. (Lane closure d.zring construction" .) The City will comply with afepirmi,t requirements aecregards lane closures during co +- +_Vuction_,af'.improvements. 2. (Sight distance Sight distances will be !*t, ntained per state standards. 3. (Vehicle storage in left -turd pockets .} State standards will be applied as regards sufficient vehicle storage in left -turn pocket�:�.. 4. (New, raffic signals shall be flnancsd by ?evelopers . . .} While it is recognized that developers shall be required to pay for the installation or modtf cation of s.:gnals which are required only to serve their projects, it is anticipated ; that store -it-lid City of Rancho Cu6imonga funding will be usse!cU to z .o,,trr,4t signals w7hic h -ire required to serve increased traff%,;, v6lume9 -rot specifically related to an Identifiable proJtct(s ). } u f `i ALAN, WARREN JULY PAGE 4 Q 4a. (Prl!�ary purpas13 of Fonthill � -!s through traffic 4 The_Sppecific : xan recognizes this purpose for Foothi.l,_ *, Bo;�-,"' evard, and xa zee extensive provt—ions for improveraeuts to the abiJj.: t of Footh {ll to carry'-tilrough traffic (qn eolen improvemeA'". -'.�cess restrictions, right tarn pockets, 6jnsolidata6x% ar',,access. etc.) 4h, f ( lraffic toncentTated at intersections . . •.} ,- _ f ' is rFecognized -,that the onstiurtiot. of raa inns °wi3 concentrate tttrne'at intersections. however,•i4llowing Mid- black turut- g i- avemeiats conflicts with the primary purpose of Voc-1. TJoulevard, which is to serve' as an eatst -weat access route. :Zn tais regard, 'it was dete�rminec that maintrenanct of tote hie4est possible carryins,;'eepaviity and the concentration of iarning movements at s ynelizod in-�eraections overrides the minor inccnvenierce to some motorist& caus'd by the Y�?ed to make U -turns to reach some locations, 4c. rrees in median' All trees g.?anted -vr thin the med,an will be consistent with state standards. Location 'o€- all trees si►all be' reviewed to emture idetuate, sight d1,9tances 'at mediar. br.eaka and driveways. (Workers in and irrigation of medians..r'1 . .} Work within the median shall be schedIuled to avoid peak hours and zeduce traffic impacts. Trr5gatlor mill lie llmit.ld, due to the use of drought - tolerant plants., Runoff will be controlled through reduced watering and the design ,of the medians, which will incorporate swales to confine runoff. 4d. (Enhan -ead pavement All enhancers pavemer is w11:, be submitted to 4altrans for approval grior to installation, (Bollards The proposed bollards have been eliminated from the proposed specific plait. ,. a ALAN, WARREN c � UL'Y 15, -Ag-U V'T_ 4e.. {Eatacia Court_. .? ) r The altem.ativea re-`er to the potential. for olOnatruetion cat an interhY k w �tttai losx etement whic,h would ,cpkinoc-t ` z4tac;a (J 7mr't with kk�o.otEi311 Boulevard. ,This a43Way be zsttxudtcdr.a „a gx.iwmte, l , aitecl- access ru'ada�ay� o` as a �. p%blic roadway gz'avid nag un.lizate:d 4kr eaS, nes.e alternatives, arsre d velopec -to gddze�iq` �cncecns of rs,;�edencs north in asaa i� Ciic r .ighborhoQdsr £` ualt 3ted pobliaccesss- were provided. FAT, r n r 3 4 �Ta G „� f t ♦ t �. YITF 4" e s .. x ��, �1• . >b , Ti,AFEi @✓£, tk4N5i?6 RlASIQN•E GINF�i3 N April 7, 1987 Mr. Jack Vladse4; 1'< HMG Architects c.. 8.32 W.. 9 :Jpiand, 91786 Dear Mr. Madsen ` Tra*s tted herewithi1s a draft of oor repok on the Feed Hil,i Country Club T ., Drive rerouting. -in the City of Curamoiayu.,f_ e study is based upon v-.forma- tion protisded by ,you, City Staff and DKS(icsvgiates.`consultants to the City,. The stu3y has reviewed�existlog and future traffic conditiogp and<�-Xamined _ alternative alignments i�F =,Red Rill Countryjalub Drive. i'A recommer:ed align- r� m.ent has been developed baked up,)q,these analyses Th,�s re:commendatibn is 7` for Red Hill Country cluli Drive to connect. dir �,yy- irJ�aothi:ll Boulevard. Please re �X;this draft and advise us of any ques ions if�c Ilents;�,at you may have. We trust that the study wit =t be of assistance to ati. Respecti617y submitted,% WESTON PRINGLE & ASS MATES Y � ' Weston 5: P. ncle, P.E. Registered Professional Ergireer State of CFlifornia Numbers C16828 & TR565 WSP.bas { 7870320 Ii CCC. IVEfl I CITY OF RANCH6 MCAMONGA. PLANNiNC OIViS,orq r hf`[i. ism PM ; 2b_°i UA T Ci•X M)AN AV�,NUE 'SUIT!✓ i }U pGtl LF�TQ? CALIF>Jkit��iA 92f 7 ,.•: 'rte• l .. It L1J / 11 TRAFFIC STUDY OF " REO HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE REROI TINS IN THL °41 �.� CITY. OF RANCHO ',CUCA NG ;j V April 7, 1987 - Prepared by i d w WESI'OI PRINCLE & - "-cSSOCIATES r� 4: l ; UTY OF hANCHO CUCAMONCA h1Ato4m i t)lu sim tc 1411 AFIR r� r P ;J s ...;.%�..: �1 i\Iu, 1 I` J tl r JI Red bill Country Cluh'Drive currently intersects Foothiit Boulevard approximately 300 feet easterly of Grove Street in the Git• of Rancho rucamonga. The inter- section is controTleri with STOP signs,, Traffic operational and safety concerns have been identified due to the proximity of the Rec) "ill County Club /Grove intersections, the volume of traffic on Foothill, the lack of traffic controls ! and other factors. As a result, the City of Rancho Cucamohga has developed two potential rerouting plans for Red Hill Country Club Drive and -this study examines factors related to each alternative. ? i The two alternatives include relocation �� Red Hill Country Club Drive to intersect Foothii: Bouievard to the east of the current location or to re- align Red Hilt Country Club Drive to intersect Grove Street northerly of Foothill Boulevard. These two alignments alternatives are-, re illustrated ;on' Figure ,1, Each alternative has been reviewed with respect to traffic operations ano safety to assist in the selection of a specific ai ^gnment,. EXISTING CONDITIONS Red Hill Country Club Drive extends from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line E, a `` ` e 4j 1 . x „. r ,Any 7 SIT" MVQ 1 k Avenue with a name change to Alt.,�,C esta. �'t is basically a two lane facilii,,y, with the section frqr'Calte Cas�riv�''io Ulle'Vista hiving single family homes, �' fronting. 'While ter' rent °t"af #, volume data were not avai?b3e, the street sloes provide access to the Red Hill Country Club and reAldential area. In audition, it is reported that the street is us�`£by through traffic,',-,wtween Foothill Boulevard and Base Liie- Avenue. Foothill Boulevard is`�a major e4st west arterial zr� State Highway Route 66. 1 Easterly of 'Strove Avenue to Vineyard Avenue, there are two lanes in east., direction with median channelization. 'this channelization allows left turns into and out of various driveways ,rnd streets_an4t is r,Urre6ily a painted meaian. The intersections of Grove�Avenlr, San Bernardino Road-and Vineyard Avenue are currently signalized with separate left turn phases on ,':oothiil Boulevard. Grovo Avenue north of Foothill Boulevard is basically a two lane st Pt that provides a connection between residegial areas hri`Footiiill ;Bowles >al�d. A commercial develap�ilent does exist on the northwest c rner of the Grove Avenue/ Foothill Poulevard inte� ection with a driveviay access to Grove Ruenue, The northeast corner is currently occupied with a nursery and any redevelopment would include additiso!ai pavement on Grove Avenue. Red Hill Country Club Drive intersects Foothill Boulevard approx!*etely 300 feet easterly of Grove Avenue.:, The two streets.from a "V" opening to the east and Red Hill Country Club Drive has.a short radius curve to approximate a right ang'i� isrtersection with Foothill Boulevard: There are two striped lanes for southbound traffic or, Red Hill Country Club Drive at Foothill Boule- r; yard with ST1.P sign control. A two -way left turn pock_t is provided on Foot- hill between Grove and Red Hill Country Club. ,here is also a section oF Red Hl-i Country Club Drive to the south -of Foothill Boulevard. Both the alignment of Red Kill Country Club Drive and pruxim ty of the Grove Avenue int_rsection result in traffir, opeFational and safety concerns. The queue for westbound traffic at Grove blacks the incersection at times,<lcft ;, turns from Red Hill Country Club Drive are difficult; left turns into Red JML Hill-Country Club Drf�6 are prevented from using, the median by westbound traffic and overall unacceptah a conditions currently.e-.,ist, E FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The City of Rancho Cucamonga and region are currently being developed with a resultant increase in traffic volumes. Several studies have been completed for the City by DKS Associates to plan for future circulation and transpor- tation demands, A specific plan study was prepared for Foothill Boulevard which included traffic projections and recommendations for intersection spacing (median breaks), PM peak hour volumes for the Foothill Boulevard intersections at Grove Avenue and at- ..Vineyard Avenue were obtained from DK5 Associatesz, These volumes represent, " "bu il d out" conditions with no Foothill Freeway. .The projections also assume a raised median on Foothill Boulevard with openings (breaks) only at Grove Avenue, San Bernardino load, Baker Aver I nue, a poi;Kt,12QO feet w €;st of ',vineyard Avenue and Vineyard Avenue:,*These { projected) traffic data nave been utilized as a basis for the analyses of alterna, v;es for Red Hill Country Club Drive, These projected volumes were utilized to calculate Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) and Level of Service (LOS) values for the two intersections (l;ae It~U methodtlogy and relationhip of ICU to LOS' are described in Appendix A), The 1CU analyses for both intersections are contained in Appendix B•, based upon build out traffic volumes and the` ntersection geometrics lit ed- in the tattles. These, analyses indicated over, capacity conditions at hot Ih, intersections and the reed, "For an improved circulation system or change in land use plans. The mitig�5tion of these probleris has 4ot been addresscd. These analyses prolide a tool for analyzing traffic bpelational needs of Foothill Boulevard. ALTERNAME ANALYSIS The two alignment alternatives for Red Hill Countr1k Club drive at Foothill Boulevard are examined in section of the report. As indicated previous-11- l� , v I' future traffic demands on Foothill - Boulevard indicate that an, impacts to traffic operations wrr'ald be significant,' This is the p- rimary concern of r � the al'ternati�te ane.,lysi's. Alternate A Alternate A would realign Red Hill Country Club Drive to intersection Foothill Boulevard approximately 750 feet easC,�rly of Grove Avenue. In order to provide 1 ik adequate traffic service to the area tbutary to Red Hill t.ountry Club Drive, a fuil intersection at Foothill Boulevard would be required. With bulldout traffic, it ca.i also 5e =.lssuw.d ttit, this intersection would warrant signali- zaton. On this basis, the principal concern is the ability of a new0inter P section: to fit into a progressive signal system on Foothil.l,Boulevard. F v The ICU analyses in Appendix B were utilized to provide an indication of cycle length and cycle split requ_ireme_nts. Since the Foothill /Vineyard is the cri- tical intersection, the analysis for,this intersection was utilized. The t ,preliminary analysis indicated that a '90-or 120 second cyc ength could satisfy demands. When pedestrian crossings of Foothill Boulevard are consi- _ dered, a li ") secon& cycle seems best. It was further indicated that 54s�Lconds 7` would be required for eastbound through traffic and 13,", seconds for westbound left turns. These data and intersection spacing were utilized to prepare a pre' time diagram as illustrated on Figure 2, Review c' Figure 2 provides an indication of possible traffic coordinatiu alang Foothili Boulevard. This is preliminary only and subje4t to refinement and revision; how aer, it, does provide an indication of cor,rtraints and Oppor- tunities. With the conditions illustrated on Figure 2, only approximately seven seconds would b_ available for Red Hill Country Cub Drive traffic, A similar ccndit:an is indicated fcr the San Bernardino woad and the on -named intersection west of Vineyard. These locations do not readily "fit" t-e tim(spac�2 relationship that would provide a progressive signal operation. lt!re are, several techniques that could be utili,zed.,to provide fors; these 519tialized median breaks. The through bai,,cd wid'v;t could he r'e&,; ed at these locations to allow for side street traffic arx(_ /''pcdest Jan crossings of Foot- hill Boulevard. Another alternative at reio'cated Red Hill Cdo4�n ry Club Drive r ca w r w of l - (3FlVA3N(A a _ o N a. av38 s7 Na103v." ., . * _ a�st?dorsa m vO s �aa�ae o c�a \ o Q ci ' . a (; LO oaoa ONIOHV'NLl3E) NVS W )^ _i'dGSd ) �ki0 Bf1•I3X81NflO? w c ULr ' i TIM d3e 1` h fYS � a'11Qa� r M �F znd at the access wese,of Vineyard would be half sig, ls{ ,This concept ' would allv,4 left turns in and out, utiiizina the median fir de,;eleration and acceleration lanes, and only stop Footn.jill,n-)ul� ,"�ard traffic in one> direction`: Similar' designs hav�:�ttilized on Mac Arthur Boulevard at �� r Douglas Street near the l�ohn Wayne A-I; port and on Beach Boy Ievard in 5t4nton, ,_ A secondary - .znefit of a.s gnal and med er break at �)te realigned R(-,d hill Country Clutr'Qrive would be improved access for commercial uses on both sides of Foothill Boulevard. Since the proposed median would restrict all driveways to right turns only, z %signal would allrw for U -turns to replace the current left turn movements: In summary, future traffic signal systems will-,be desirable for FnWthiil Boulevard, A system will limit the opportunities for median beaks, and sig nalized intersections. Preliminary analyses of time -space relationships indicate that there are potential problems with signals at a'realigned'Red Hill Country Club Drive, San Bernardino Road and the proposed brea!: west of Vineyard. Adjustments to allow the signal at San 13ornardino Rdud woul,4 -also aIiow a signal at realigned Red Hill Country Club Drive.. Another.opV on of a half signal at the realigned intersection -can be considered. In either case, a signal at realigned Red Hi'!,;i Country Club Drive can he providt without a major impact upon traffic operations on Foothill goulevaM. Alternate B This alternative would,, real ign- -Red Hit[ Country C1ub;Drive to intersect Grove Avenue northerly of Foothil' Ooulevard, Preliminary plant indicate. a connection to Grove Avenue to align tt,th an ekisting commercial J'riyeway approximately 200 feet north of the stop ling for southbound traffic at Foothill Boulevard. The alignment between Grow Aven�je and the existi?6 street wuuld be through the existing nursery with some.tyge of "S" or rey *1sing• curves. This would split the property in some manner depending, upon the final alignment of RYd Kill Country Club DrivE ` While this alternative would eliminate possible inter- section on Foothill Boulevard, it does include some negative factors. 11 �; The projected peak hour, volumes fo6'f outhb.rnd Grove Avenue at Foothill Bouie- i vard (See Ap�alndix 8),,*uld''indica -te the need for a left turn porker length of l approximately t!}D feat:,; A southbound through demand of 22D vehicles is r' 'eo- is jectea for the PM hour. These demands would makeothp addition of a new street to.-the east .undesirable. Vehicle queues could, bia'ck the new inter- section and conflicts wound develop with vehicles entering and Jeaving,the commercial :area. Signalization would not be recommenced due to the prorcimity !_: F c :: of Foothil)L'Boulevard. Probl,2ms similar to the existing condition on Foothill Bois ;evard .�t a e# `Hil1� Country Club Drive could develop. 4 L/ i Redevelopment of th,_ nursery property is currently being Pruposed which would include nursing care, a ret'rement center and doctors clinic. Th9 construction 4F a,TIl ector type road through a development of this typo Would not be desirable. ,This type of complex is pedestrian oriented and vehiclelpedes- p " trian conflicts should be minimized. In addition, t Ore could be noise / end air quality considerations. 'd An alignment through the nursery site could result in substandard or right angle curves. T hese would be undesirable rable for a collector street such as Red Mill Country Cub Drive ,1ue to safety considerations. In summary, Alternative'B would realign Red Hill Country Club Drive thrOLgh the existing nursery site to Grove Avenue. While this alternative would nut regarre an intersection on Foothill Boule ard,,,it does have some negative factors. Projected traffic demands on Grove Averue'coulii result in queues blocking the proposed Red Hill Country Club Drive intersection. Increased traffic demandz;on Grove Avenue could also impact the intersection operations at Foothill Boulevard ?rd Grove Avlifue. An alignment through the nursery site would adver_.:ty "affect redevelopment of the site and result in a sub- standard road with respect to safety. SUMMARY This study has reviewed alternative: - routings or alignments of Red Hill Country+ Clw) Drive at Foothill Boulevard ip;the City of Rancho Cutaovo.Aga. :Existing ny� G ,rid future traffic conoiltions. have been reviewed and summarized to` ptovide a high level of trMffst ogoations and to maximiza capaci " along Foothill l � ffoulevard, A preliminary dime -space dY gram was lrrdpated to assist let'' t evaluating future`conditiops. " Potential, .r.rablems were r nj Alfed,w th three potential sigr(�7r�ed inter sec- >, �.,/ tions on Foot Boulevard between fl;o+e and Uineya� {utilizing the -time= > space diagram. These proOoms co he m�ittg?,. .ted by reducing, the thrp rgh sand or by instal J pg half signals. Thesesitgat�ns would be r-rrtd vhitho `^ the Red Hill',,` :juntry Club QrV4e j&tersectian. A benefit of a signal, at ar realigned Red Hill Country Club Drive is improved a(mcess to existing com- mercial uses through (- -Wrns. { i� F, {intersect Alternative B would' realign Red Hill our:try Club Drive to Go�� Avenue and not Foothill Seutevard. Wile this 1 lu`r —,3tes the impact of�} new intersection on,,,Footh!17 it does havej�several=*ative impacts.• T se - include congestion and operational problems an �OYe, increasea �ongesti,�n a� the Grove / Foothill in ersectian, impacts upon redevelopmint of the q,r- sery site and possible substandard design of Red Hill Country Club Drive. z, C'on:ideration of all factors examined indicates a real grmret to intersect Foothill Boulevard easterly of the current interjection is besi is Alternative A\avnd would h6ve the Ieast negative impacts based upon the factors examirid in this stady. A more- detailed study of signal system re -- quirements along Foothilf "Soule *yard shoeld be completed and include the Red Hill ouatry Club Drive intersection. U ,; & e'!7— g,r a� i TM .yr..�`z' r �f jl @ YYrr t APPEN41X A t ' EXPLANATION Qf�- 44TERSECHON CAPACITY UTILIZATION AND �. LEVEL OF SERVk- r i - i m UL. i r 7Q -Q: QJ MIR r fk k. 1 APPF-NDIX A EXPLANATION OF INTERSECTION CAPACIV-- dTILIe'ATION V 1 77 ;77: i The capacity of a street is nearly always greater between intersections and less at intersections. The reason for this is that the traffic flows continuously between intersections and only part of the time at intersections. To study intersetion capacity, a tech',Iique known as Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) has been developed. ICU analysis consists of (a) determining the pro - portion of signal time needed to serve each conflicting movement; (b) summing the times for the movements; and j comparing the total time required to the time available. For example, if for north -south traffic the northbound traffic s 1,000 vehicles per hour., the southbound traffic is 800 vehicles per hour, and the capacity of either approach is 2,000 vehicles per hour of green, then the northbound traffic is critical and requires 1,000/2,000 or 50 percent of the signal time. If for the east -west traffic, 40 percent of the signal, time is required, then it can be seen that the ICU is 50 plus 40, or 90 percent. When left -turn phases exist, they are.incorporated into the analysis. As ICU's approach 100 percent, the quaiity`of traffic service approaches Lev _-1 of Service (LOS) E, as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 87, Highway Research Board, 1955. Level of Service is used to describe quality of traffic flow. Levels'of Service A to C operate quite well. Level of Service G ',a Typically the level of Service for which an urban street is designed. Level �t'.Service E is the maximua volume facility can accommodate and will result in possible stoppages of momentary` duration. Level of Service F occurs when a '":xil'if�t is overloaded and is characterized by stop - and -;�o traffic with st:;i ayes of long duration. A des - cription of the various revels of service.apj%,,,ary all the following page. The ICU calculations assume that an intersecti�+n is signalized and that the j signal is ideally timed. Although calculating ICU for an unsignalized inter- section is not valid, the presumption is that a signal can be installed and the calculatln snows whether the geometrics are capable of accommodating the ex- pected volumes. It is possible to have an ICU well below 1.0, yet have severe traffic congestion. This would occur because one or more movements is not getting enough time to satisfy its demand with excess time; existing on other moves. Capacity is often defined in terms of roadway width. However, standard lanes have approximately the same capacity whether they are 11 foot or 14 foot lanes. Our data indicates a typical lane, whether a through lane or left -turn lane has a capacity of approximately 1600 vehicles per lane per hour of green time. The Highway Capacity Manual found capacity to be about 1500 vehicles per lane per hour of green for through lanes and 1200 vehicles per lane,per h1ur of green for left -turn lanes. However, the capacity manual is based on pre -1965 data, aN rerent studies and observations shear higher flapacities in the southern Cal,fornia area. For this study ,a capacity of 1600 vehicles per lane has been assumed for through traffic, and 1600 vehicles per lane for turning lanes,. f APPENDIX A l.EVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS Level of �� 1. Nominal Range Service, ji Of ICU (a) r 1777 A Low vclumez ; high speeds; speed not restricted- 0.00 - 0.60 by nvcer vehicles; all signal Cycles clear with nu vehicles wanting through more than one signal cycle I ` 8 Operating speeds beginning to be affected by 0.61 - &70 other traffic; between one and te�i percent of the signal cycles have one or more vehicles which wait through mace than one signal cycle during peak traffic periods. C Operating speeds and maneuverability closely 0.71 ;6.80 controlled'by, other traffic; between 11 and' 3 0 scent ofAhe signal, cycles have one or. moi* vehicles which wait through more than one s~ylal cycle during peak traffic periods; recommended ideal design standa04. D Tole'i,abie op ?rating speeds; 31 to 70 percent 0.81 - 0.90 a of thii.siynai cycles have one or more vehicles which "wait thrugh more than ine signal cycle { during peak traffic periods; often used as { design k*�tandard in urban areas. E Capacity\;the maximum traffic volumes an inter - 0..91 - 1.00; `. section can accommodate; restrl -ted speeds; 71 to 100 percent of the signal cycles have one _ or more._;ehicles which wait through mere than one signal cycle during peak traffic periods. F Long queues of traffic; unstable flow; stop- Not meani "gful pages of Tong duration; traffic voluma and traffic speed can drop to zero; traffic volume will be less than the volume which occurs at Level of Service E. (a) -wU (Intersection -'apacity Utilization) at various Levels Service versus Level of Service E for urban arterial streets. APPEEIDIX B, INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION WORKSHEETS �y 4 INTERS ITY UTI,LIZATI61' ANALYSIS PM, PEAK HOUR ; INi ERSErhTiON' FQ��QjTHILC / GROVE MOVEMENT PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED LANES CAPACITY VOLUME '° VJC , +{! . �t NL 2 3200 419 0.13 ja NT 1 y, 1600 292 0.1$ 'l NR 1 1600 438 0.27 SL 1 1600 i8s 0.12 * . ST 1610 220 0.14_ F SR 1 �) 1600 110 0.07 EL I 1600 '115 0.07 *' ET 3- 4800 2305 0.48 ER I x.,1600, 1$0 0.11 y,. WL 1 1600.= 18,7 0.12 IiT 3 4890 3208 0,67 WR 1 1600 195 0..12 NORT�F.+!SDUTH CRITICAL SUMS = 0.30 EAS,tWES7 CRITICAL SUMS = 0.74 CLEA DANCE _ '= ICI 11109 a OS N= NORTHBOUND, S =SOUTl HOUND ,E= EASTBOUND,W =IwESTBa NO s L= LEFT,T =THROUGH,R= RIGliT, LOS =LEVEL OF SERVICE ,, * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS �» iNT�RSCwTd'N cAPATY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS „ r PM,, PEAX HOUR .a INTERSECT6 -N POQTHILL / VINEYARD I MOVEMENT PROPOSED PROPOSEV PROPOSED PROPOSED' LANE'S CAPACITY VOLUME VIC ; NL 2 320D 2G$ 0.08 NT 3 48 00 2562 0.33 NR 1 1600 530 0.33 SL r 320 409 0_23 ST 3 1300 909 0.14 " SR 1 1600 213 0.13 EL. 2, 3200 401 'S X13 " ET 3 4300 2524, 0.53.* n. k• ER 1 1600 1L1 WL 2 3200 416 0.13 { F�. WT 3 480O ,2434 0.51 = %7 WR 1 1640 566 0.35 <` � NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = 0.46 EAST/WEST CRITICAL S1 ;5 _ 0.66 j\ CLEARANCE _ 0.05 ICU 1.17 LOS = r N= NOP. THBOUND ,S=SOUTHfiOUND,E =EASTBOUND,W= WESTBOUND L_ — LEfT,T THROUGH,R RIGHT, LOS -LEVEL OF SERVICE DENOTES" CRITICAL MOVEMENTS A3, d�.yv I r DKS Associates r 411 West Fifth Street t Suite 500 Los Angeles, G4 80013 12131627 0419 > 4: dune 12. 1987 Paul Rougeau Traffic Engineer City of Rancho 'Cucamonga _ 9340 Baseline Road, Box a07 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 9173E -0807 RE: Red Hill CC Drive Rerouting. A87x0001 Dear Paul: We have reviewed the report. "Traffic Study of Red Hill Country Club Drive Rerouting in the City of Rancho Cucamolga ". by Weston Pringle & Associates and have the following comments: General o The Level of Service,Galculations shown in the Appendix use a clearance value which appears to be low. The intersrections of Foothill Boulevard at Grove and at Vii1eyard will probably require multi- phased traffic signals, given the high volume qf left turns projected for the future. Traditionally. a value of 0.10' used with four critical signal phases.` This value. instead of G.05. should be applied at these intersections. `The result will be higher °ICU" values. although the Levels of Service will not change;. they will remain at "F ". Alternate A o The assumed average speed of 40 miles per hour in the time -space diagram appears to be high, considering the fact that two of the intersections will be oversaturated. Vehicles would need to travel at top speeds closer to 50 miles per hour in order to attain a 40 mile'aer hour average Sneed. A time -space diagram using a lower speed is recommended, prefer - ably 35 miles per hour. f o Near the bottom of page 4. the report suggests that the throftth band width could be reduced at San Bernardino Road and at the proposed new intersection at Red Hill Country Club Drive. However. given the time- J space diagram in the report, providing more red time at San Bernardino Aft a would provide no benefit at Red Hill Country Club Drive. The` ~1pposite is also true. As a result. providing sufficient red time att"both of these in'ter.sections would narrow the band Width so that Foothill Boule- vard is considerably impacted. A3, E Paul Rougeau June 12, 1987 Page 2 o The installation of half signals would improve traffic progression. but the median would be too narrow to implement this design. The median is about 14 feet wide.at the proposed new intersection. and tapers down to zero near San Bernardino Road.' Adequate acceleration lanes would not be feasible at these locations. k o We disagree with the conclusion that a signal at the realigned inter- section of foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive will not have a major impact on traffic operations. Band widths in the time- h space diagram would have to be narrowed considerably in order to allow for side street traffic at this new intersection. o While it is true that the signal at the realigned Red Hilf Country Club Drive intersection would allow U -turns to be made. the same could be said about unsignalized median breaks. Furthermore. in order tr• preserve a high level of service on Foothill Boulevard. access to commercial properties should be _via the median breaks at Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road with off - street internal circulation to be provided t5 serve the commercial properties between these two intersections. Al'terna'te E f , i o In general, the assumptions and conclusions drawn accurately depict the impacts this alignment would have on local circulation and traffic operations. However. no attention has been given to a potential land swap between the City and the property owners. Rather than splitting the property, the City could shift the alignment further north, redu- cing conflicts with Foothill Boulevard relzted traffic, and the medical complex pedestrian traffic. o Although overall levels of service and congestion wouldd, increase on Grove Avenue. it is more desirable to use this alternative as the primary site access rather than Foothill Boulevard. because Foothill Boulevard is a major arterial that is projected to carry substantial volumes of traffic in the future. The median system was designed to maintain the highest level of service possible including the enhancement of safety through a reduction of vehicle /pedestrian conflicts, Please feel free to contact me at your earliest ronverience regarding these comments. Sincerely, OKS Associates Joey Falter Transportatioc.�rngineer i 7136.a001nccc.rpt t.. �lt lu 9 RESOLUTIOV NO. A RESOLUTION :3F THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CE-RTIFYING THAT THE FINAL ENVIROik1ENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ADDENDUM PREPARED FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN IS COMPLETE AND ADEQUATE WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report and Addendum was prepared tv, address the potential environmental effects of the Foothill Boulevard Specific. Plan; and WHEREAS, the draft EIR and Addendum has undergone the required public review period. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby certify the final Environmental Impart Report and Addendum as adequate, based on the following findings: 1. The final Environmental impact Report and Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and State and local EIR guidelines. 2. The f`anal Environmental Impact Report and Addendum contains appropriate measures to mitigate potential Environmental impacts, and adequately addresses all reasonable anvironmeiltol concerns generated by the project. FURTHER, LET IT BE RESOLVED, that the following statement of overriding considerations is also adopted: "Future development proposals submitted under the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan have the potential for creating some significant environmental effects which cannot be.fully mitigated. These of -lets, identified in the final EIR, are the unavoidable rei -,O. of development taking place in partially development commercial areas of the community. However, the degree of these impacts is being mitigated to the fullest extent feasible through the measures incorporated into the EIR and the draft Specific Plan. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan itself is z measure to mitigate. potential adverse impacts of development on the existing community which would otherwise occur without a planned and comprehensive approach. The draft Specific Plan contains provisions tailored to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor and is meant to replace existing City -wide zoning regulations that do not address the unique qualities and community traits of the significant portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. I I 'T 77 EIR 02. IWK Page 2' -A Ma' pfii 14 �I's poient-$O. enytronMentai; t4t, Foothi-44 ftyftvard Specil, It, e etft V It r6t, a 43V ktk aitd, -extent whitt �v w6fvt& o"ifi oz,�,Ur uQev! iai ns_ APPROMtD,AW APOPTSa TiNES 2-2ND, MY, GP JULY,, 1987. J� _AWNG COMEtSM OF' ThE QM, OF RANC Ws GUCAMONGA LarrY T.. Mc%11074, cw�warr ATTEST: Brad i3ttiii�er,,,Depaity,,'recre-mry 1, E."ad Bul 1 er, Deputy �ecrettavy, ot the, r-lanniq comission of� the, City of Ash- Rancho Cucamonga,, & hereby, certf f -goft'g�,Resplgtttjon� was du1y and y, tha�j ttre fbve regularly introduced6, psted, and adopted'40-thi Ptinf&hg, Commissiort of the City of Rancho Cucamong4 at__1 re-qUI-ar, Me ti')�qt of thre PlannUg Camisston held on the 22nd day of July, 1987's ty the fol"eowens vote-to-wit. AYES: COMUSS-raN NOES: COMIS'StOMERS: 'SIONERS. ABSENT: COMIS Q,k CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT l� DATE: July 22, 1987 k �� /� ✓ TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Coarmission NOM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan 4larren, Associate Planner R Kam. R R� SUBJECT: FOOTHILL `,'BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN - A public h_aring'to -, consider approval o e ra oothili Boulevard Specific " Plan. The draft Specific Plan provides for detailed land use categories and development standards for -all future development on properties adjacent ~, to Foothill Boulevard. (Continued from July 8, 1987) i J I. BACKGROUND: At the July 8, 1987 meeting, the Planning CI"- i�ion= " o ere nal direction on the Foothill Boulevard S�c�Tfi °-plan. Prior to its final determination however, the Ran Cho ';Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce requested an opportunity to revieww -?she final draft prior to Planning Commission action. P1dnnir;g st-��4 met with the Economic Davelopdent Ccmmittee of the Chamber on Jule 15, 1987, at which a sumary of the planned provisions was presented. The J comments received from the Chamber were generally very positive, and staff does not anticipate any additional significant feedbeck 1 ;, presentative from the Chamber may provide input at the t progli >� meeti�, g. r, In addition, in a final review of the document, staff has noted a few last items need to be adjusted. These are noted in the followi;g sections: Maps: The extension of the regionally related commercial uses along the east side of the I -i3 Freeway was mistakenly left off the iand use map. Exhibit "A" indicates how the final land use map wili - ►epict this area as it was shorn on all previous drafts. The maps will also incorporate the new freeway on and off ramps on the east side of 1 -15. Tree Plartings: The plan allows for a variation of building -setbacks in the activity nodes :From a miniMUm of 25 feet to 45 feet. The double row of Sycamore street trees was designed for the 45 foot setback i ITEM _C PLANNING. GOMaiWWOM STAIr'F REPORT,' RE: FOOTHILL BOULEY i PLAIT July 22, 1107 � Page 2 a1 concept. In some areas however, such as the Archibald intersection„ the City will wish to encourage a 25 foot setback. Staff analysis of Chia alternative reveals difficulty in using a doutyle row of Sycamtorrs in such a narrow setback. In addition, Cal Trans prohibits large trees within State, hfghway- public rights- of-way. Therefore, a modified streetscape planting of P ?ape Myttles is recommended for the activity centers (see Exhibit "W ). Is tree species should be small enough for WTrans acceptanete and would sati4fy the City`s desires for a picturesque street tree to provide a formal' accent line within the actisvity centers. Further, this species is well adapted for this climate and will, as a side benefit, provide accent color, along the sidewalfks and as an alternative median island accent -tree. The streets,,cape within the Bear gulch area should retain the use of Sycamore trees in a single row concept, which would tie into a natural planting scheme of Sycamores- on private property. Minfamm Lot Dimensions: The plan does not list m n-3mum lot standards {depth and width for properties in the Community Commercial district, instead referring � to General Commercial standards in the City's Development Code. SiAce' there is no Community Commercial District designation within the Code, staff believes confusion might result as to which standard should apply. Therefore, staff recommends that we incorporate a 200 font min mum lot width and 175 fog*�lot depth (which stays consistent with the General Commerciav= =fiignation) for the Community ';ommierical lest standards. Eucalyptus Grove at Foothill i4 East Avenue: The Ftiwanda Specific Plan calls for partial preservation of thin Eucalyptus grove at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard. as follows: Foothill /East Avenue Location: This site has beats selected for Neighborhood Commercial use ulth specific intent to allow for partial oreservation of the existing Eucalyptus grove. She site plan for such use shall incorporate as many existing trees as possible, but no less than; GOB of the area of grove nor less than 25% of the trees. Provisions shall also be made for a 20' wide Greenway through the J�nterior boundary near the northwest corner of the site ft future connection to the Comity Trail system and Miller Park.: t PLANN:I,'IS REPORT RE. i0(1�C 11i. "L ' �RCCIFIC PLA July ;? 1987 Pas: With the rew6iM of this site from the EtiwandC) Plan, this provision will be loost. Staff suggeets that this text is incorporated into the Foothill Plan. Executive Summary; y Staff Is continuing to Mork with the consultant to improve the graphics and their relationship to the text. Additional items anticipafia.d to be added include: cam-` a. A spall strip asap showing the project boundaries and � subarea locations, r i' b. A pervpective view of a typical activity node which will show the formal urban design characteristics. 11. CONCLUSIONS: 1 All Planning Commission direction for modification of the Draft C Plan have been completed and the Plan should now be ready 1`C ,City Auk Council review. The Planning Commission should note. however, that the General Plan Amendments required prior t:; final enactment of the Specific Plan, will not be ready for Planni—ng Commission action 4. until the second meeting in August. Therefore, the attached draft Resolution of Approval has a condition requiring adoption of the General Plan Amendment before the approval is effective. This Procedure will allow the City Council to begin these public { hearings while the Planning Commission action on the General Plan Amendments "catches up" with the specific P13n City Council action. 111. RECOMENUT-MR: It is recommended that the Planning Commission, recomann o -the 'City Council the approval of the Foothill Boulevard'" ;'cif'ic Plan by the adoption of the attached Resolution. Respully s, itt ra r City PT ner BS:AW -.ko Attachments.: Letter from Paul Max, Rancho Foothill partners Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" l; Resolution with Exhibits tj 1.,) C?i ) ncho I t� cc 0 s i ,idly 10, 1987 0` Neil VeQ Ni ry c o�'��a Ott Acho Commission `��'gf9, c o Panning Department �l�jl�af 9540 Baseline Road � 131�l5NS Suite B Rancho Cucamonga, CAA 91'730 Attn: Commissioner harry McNeil, Chairman Commissioner Suzanne Chitiea, Vice Chairman Commissioner Bruce Emerick Commissioner 1,svid Blakesley Commissioner Deter Tolstoy Ray Rancho Foothill Office Center 10155 Foothill Boulevard i Ran:11.o Cucamonga, CA Dear Commissioners: Rancho Foothill Partners would like to extend our appreciation for allowing us to speak on our behalf with regard to our request to have the City of Rancho Cucamonga implement a minor addendum to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Our request, as stated at the public hearing, wound be to realign the proposed CC zone on_the south side of Foothill Boulevard, from Turner Avenue in an easterly direction to encompass the ' existing Michael ,F`s restaurant and our adjacent vacant property, consisting of approximately 1.6 acres. As the Commission is aware, Rancho Foothill Partners has already gone through all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga`s processes for the development of a 37,000 square foot, tvo -story office building, for our subject site. 0ur request was not presented with the intent to abandon the project, but simply to expand our options to allow us to create a development which may not only be more economically feasible for us, but would also benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga with a greater tax base than the use jk presently planned. We also feel that since our property is basically an "in- fill" type of project, our request is reasonable and should have no great impact An the overall Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. OMSWNTUDAPI\XS CIA=T CTtifllft!`1fV [`aatens :rnes��ssu_�aas, r- -1 -• l� +". S ..r y ", :k % ac r i,. �'a".` elm. °icy — "� si .k' t ✓ �� Raacho July - -l�fl,. " m t3sa4tt s ff hirt4een, nom We will be :,ertitedo�ni�n,g .Ch�e �?7.a<nn�yg, TY p � u and July ZZ. 1907 Zcha' Aext� sch�d ad j. rIAg- dupe }. to 1e�ectte 1 our request. We voul<d sg c* any- input the Cogtaigs om aray #, have regardtwg trhia matter, s� We would Bake to q:xteaid our t6mks for the co�xrtes es shown two in the gas°t and we look forward to your assistance in tha near _ << future. ,�:incerel [ Rancho f i ]Foot ,4 F 8�s`tnQ"9 $ Max . Partner PM /dls cc: Brad Buller - i1 Alan Walters Sheldon Latt AA IL K , j �r uurr V Chi R R v v �` } A RESOLL'TIOT1 OF; SHE PLANK C ISSIttMf OF THE CITY OF MUD; G Ah1QHiYiA, CALIFORKIk REPM- liAOI`I S ADOPTION OF � T E FOOTHILL BORFVAPD SPECIFi�'' a� , WHEREAS, it is fife desire of tha'�City to encourage an orderly and planned system of growth thrqugdtput the Foothill Boulevard Ga'rridor of the and ;t WHEREAS, A specific,olan for the .Fl-othill Beu' yard Csarridbr would provide for ,such ,such a system of growth; i ': � ' WHEREAS, planning lairs of the State of California provide for the City's adoption of >d 'Specific Plan wt:irla sets forth land uses and standards for devzlvst and WHEREAS. the 0C ifomia Environmental �aality Act {GEQA3; 3f I570, a5 amended, potential ritigatj6n measures, and possible alternatives that might be caused or fount necessary, by the adoptioo of xhe Specific Fla»= and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended certification of an �`i.. Environmental Impact Report avid addendum for the Specific Plan project; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning CdMission held duly advertised public hearings to solicit public revieet and comment on the Draft _ Foothill Boulevard S,:ecific Plan in accordance with Government Cods,Section 65500; and WHEREAS,-full coasideratior. has been given to each pomment:or, rawest made concerning the Draft Footh11.1 Boulevard Specific Plan, and the City has initiated review of the General Plan land ur�a designations effected ay the ^` Specific plan; and WHEREAS, all items have been accorapiished in accordance with the State Law o California regarding adoption of the Spen-.111c Plan and certification of an Environmental Impact Report. NOW, YHEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the - City of Rancho Cucamonga recommend adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan for tke area is shown in Exhibit *A-!"' and "A-Z' as prepared by the City staff and revised yy the Planning Comomis'sion su, ect to enactment of General Plan Amendment 87� -028. t. i Yu � 5 FLANitiSVS40D �hEa�OL'IO � RE' � ?4't FRF PLAA! July 29, , 18"$ Page 2 _ r „ APPROVED A?6 A D�3 TEPWTNIS 22ND 'DAY OF "JULY, 1981, � F :< PLANNING CUi±6MISSI" IIF 'TOE Ci ,Y of RA CIiO CUCA lf1N6A U BY: `arT'i! . UM, Gnarmart ATTEST: ,5 ran u 'pa, .. crp °ary E, Brad Buller, yr SeCretary of the Planning Conmi;sslon of the C ty. of Rancho G aatonya , -9 Qr by certify, that the foregoing Resolution was duly nd regOarly initr f, passed, and adopted by the Planning Copasiss on of the City of Ranch,�Cu�,.�„ 'Mar ya, at a reyu meetftg;� f the Plaanina C #'ssi a held on the 22 day o� Juty, 1967, by the foil<>vin4 yrfc-to- wit s AYES? �: C"ISSIONERS.; rtllf�S: COWISSIONERS: .: ABSENT: CMISSIONERS: ;i II �. 'z 9 � A Vim_ t. ` t- it .u_. ta.L . .:m ., AL", —14 E ((^ AM P yy ti, •Z CITY OF ITEM. ForRri ► BOI►► FVARn �-E.rt T . PLAN RANCHO CU ; 40NGA 'TITLE: _ efi PLANNiNG DIVVIS EXHIBIT AEI 1 10-9 SEEM' , �� \�: U ,41 t 9,77' DATE: July 22, 1987 TO: Chafrman and Members of the Planning Comraissian FROM: Barad Buller. City Planner y BY Alak,WArren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: EtJYIR0NMWAL AW $St ElIT AN©'GEkERAb PLAN MBNDAi£t T 87 -Z _ revues a amea f e -Wad use map a e nera . to reflect lanai use changes proposed by the Poothill''-- „Boulevard Specific Plan as follows: (Continued from Jul�,8 ",1981) y Commercial to Office for 8..45 acres on the northeast corner of Grove Avenue and - F'oothil'l Boulevard - APR 207 - 011 -43 & 44.. 2. Office to Commercial for: a. Approximately 3 acre an the northeast corner of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Sao Bernardino Road - APR 207 - 113 -01, 10; 4= b. Approximately 3.5-- acres on the southwest corner Of Carnelian Avenue and Sari Bernardino Road = APSE 207-102-03, 05,, 08, 09, 12 & 19; c. , Approximately 8 acres on the northeast corner , ')f Interstate 15 and Foothill Boulevard - APR 22j- 211-24, 25 & 27; and _ d.-. Approximately 5 acres on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APR 229- 311 -14 & 15. 3. Medium Residential to Commercial for: a. Approximately 11 acres on the southwest corner of Turner Avenue and Foothill Boulevard portions of APR 208 - 321 -23 A 24. b Approximately 7.5 acres, 175 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of Etiwarda Avenue - APR 227- 201 -08 & 22, and portions of APR 227401-07; and i� ITEF!; x,J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT :y c. GPA 87 -03B - CITY OF'4ANC-HO vuWONGA duly 22, 1987 Pagel { c. Approximately 5.5 acres, 500 feet ns+rth of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of East Avenue - portions of APH 227- 23 -23. 4. Low Residential to Commercial for approximately 9 acres, 300 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the east side of Turner Avenue -� APH 1077- 601 -08 & 10, and portions of APH 1077- 601 -02 & 04; 5. Industrial Park to Commercial for approximately 37 acres on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APR 229 -031 -03-13 & 20. 6. To adjust, the line betwe�A Medium Residential and Commercial in the block b�,'rdered by. Foothill Boulevard, San. Bernardino Road, Hellman Avenue and Klusman Avenue (see exhibit). Division line as shown is spp'r'ox W' , Precise location of land use divisions to lie 6etermined through the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. I. BACK "J�RO�DUKD__• The land use changes listed in this item are actions n4°,, ss—Ma e—d by the anticipated enactment of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (refer to Exhibit °A "). The General Plan Amendment will change land use designations for those properties along Foothill Boulevard proposed for change by the draft Specific j Plan. The General Plan must be amended before final approval of the Specific Plan by the City Council. II. DISCUSSION: The Environmental Assessment of the General Plan ROM -f—is tied closely to the Environmental Review of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. For that reason, it has been determined that an expanded Environmental Impact Report, including the General Plan issues, is required. The EIR review period will end on August 18„ "987 and at the August 26, 1987 meeting, the Planning Comimissior may act on both the EIR and General Plan Amendment. The Planning Commission recommendation for approval of the Specific Plan may continue on to the City Council for their review. During the Council's review period, the Planning Commission will then be able to hold public hearings on the General Plan Amendment and EIR with the City Council withholding final action until these items are forwarded to these by the Planning Commission. n r Iii. RECD E€I�IED� T Ott': The, ;dPlanning, Comftsior �iauld Open the pu sh Tiearenc a Ry arl {ii Cont n+xe it unto: Oe gas� 26 1987 <} reet�saq €a lrial�;�dr�siceration Faith the cc i .6ted Environ*en l tmPadt Root. Res p _ ally s teed; „J Bea f City aftner BB <AW.kA Attaehmentar exhibit "A" if Amok i it ti: V L 6 - Z z l/1l � rr 11• ° M�M E-4M yyW Mil !rt OZZ z z A Q cl U wo o u Cat 6 - Z z l/1l � rr 11• ° M�M E-4M yyW Mil !rt OZZ z z P ;.n x, 9 vil.s Vl• }1tkLS6.iis}V VL14JtSLYiCf1`FiTt1 Gt� .. a r- o � STAFF REPORT U > DATE: July_ „22, 1987 W7 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, C Y Planner BY: Alan Warren, As'lciate planner SUBJECT: ENYIRONMENTAI. A%SF SS�h,4_Et�T AND ETIWANDA r,1ECIFIC PLAN 'ITT 0F-!M1-ff0 OCAMORGA, n n to remove rma'5elyiwanda pec c an approximately 57 acres of Tend on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between the,�\Ia15 Freeway and East Avenue, approximately S acres of land on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard;, and approximately kj!�acres of land on the southwest corner of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 227- 211 -24, 25 & 27, APR 227 - 22141 -03, 07 -0, 14 Cl 22 -27, APH 227- 231 -15, 21j, 28, 29, 33 & 34, APR 229.31t- 4 & S, APN 224 - 041 -10, rl,d portions of APH 227- 231 -15 & 23. I. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: A portion of the Foothill Souleva4 Specific-Plan- area a ween the I -15 Freeway and East Avenue is currently regulated by the `Etiwanda Specific Plan (E.S.P.) (see Exhibit "A "). In anticipation of adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific plan, these properties along Foothill Boulevard should be deleted from the Etiwanda Specific Plan to avoid- overlapping development: regulations. Action on -this amendment should wait until the Planning Commission recom ends adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to the City Council. Further, the adoption recommendation of the E.S.P. Amendment should be conditioned upon final City Council adoption of the Foothill Flan, Staff believes that the findings 'Fisted in the draft Resolution can be made in conjunction with 'che Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan actions. II. RECOWENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission i'ecohmna approval of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 87 -02 by the adoption of the attached Resolutions. \IX ITEM E ; - , -4:iij w- . r ROPOT l7Px RIiWHO 'CUCAM UGA July2„ page 2 Respe fiully subeittdd, 8r @ Cite annex 88.i*ko Attachments: Othlb:t '"A" Resolution No, w- . 7 f. RCSOLUTION NO., 9 A RESOLD- r1WOF THE RAWJQ,C CM,OWA MANNING COMI..S$ro RECOt+END ;ItiG AtavAL Op' A SPECIFIC PLAN -Lx, A. } AMEl1DF1T.8"7 Q%' RBtiE,,�iIN L ON Tk18 SnU°T41 SI'.r_.. ; FOOTHILL NUl.£ MO BETWEEN �E I -15 FRE&AX AND EAST AVENUE„ THE SOV1'7404I CORNER OF FOOTHILL OGUL {{((ARD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE', AND THE SOUTHWEST ORNER OF MTHI'LL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE BE DELETED FRCM 74E E.S.P. WHEREAS, on the 22nd day, of July, 1987, an application was .filed and accepted on the above - described project; hd WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July, 1987, the Planning Commiss�n held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant_ta.�S�:on 6�4 of the Ca ilfornia Government Code, SMTION 4: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following°fi Ungs: 1. That the "subject properties-are part of =the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan as recommended for approval ' by the Planning Commission; and 2. That the -aubject property is suitable for the uses permitted in wie proposed Foothill Specific Plan in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 3. That the proposed district change would not have :Significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 4. That the proposed district change is in conformanm with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro ec w not create a significant adverse impact on the enviromnent, and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on July 22. 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 55855 of the California Government Code, that 'the planning Commission of the City of Rancho',CuManga hereby recommends approval on the 22n `ifay of July, 1987, Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No.. 87 -02 for the area to be removed from the Etiwanda Specific Plan as indicated on Exhibit "A`. Y e Page ` TieF 40 lip' Co inn h reb ,� rec o nds t fit; e City Ga s3 l apps a and adopt ttfW t6k Specific ` - Flan eri,d►ae No. rG2�'sub$ect tr i4ae Chy=Cous"cil a) Gen*^,Il 'Pla'n Amsnd!nent{Xoa 87,i-68, and � b) Foothill, Ho-Liev4rd specif \\ APPROVED AND .AYQpfED THIg'22NG`DAY.OF DAY, 11211 PLANNING COMb1ISSION OF THE CITY OF RAMPO CUCAMON6A - 1 BY. Larry T. McNlej. Chairman '! _ \� � ATTEST: K Brad Butler, epa y cM 1 Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning COmaission of the City of r Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the' foregoing = Resolution.was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plar_ina Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at regular me-eting of the Pianninq Commission held •, _ on the 22nd day of Jul , 1487, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CO€WISSIONERS: HOE'S: GOMi3" �ION�RS . ASSENT: COMISSIONERSz r a r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM€3NGA ClyCAMO STAFF REPORT �.�' t Vb�n - w o . a z !, U D DATE: Ju?y 22, 1987 1977 F TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY, Alan Warren, Associate manner ? SUBJEU: ENVIRONMENTAL ASuESSMENT ii-!D INAUSTRIAI. SPECIFIC PLAN 1 7� ENOMENT -81-01 Z-7 ""� amen n to remove ra;: e n us r a rea Specific 'Plan approximately 00 acre, of land on the south side of Foothill Boulevard betwen the I -15 FreewEy and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 229 - 031 -01 -1 & 20.and portions of 229 - 021 -57 & 59. I. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The portion of land in the - Foothill, 1150017evard spec c an on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between the I -15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue (see Exhibit "A ") `ts currently regulated by the Indu' trial Area Specific Plan (I.S.P.). In anticipation of adopiron of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the industrial 'land along Foothill boulevard should be deleted ,from the I.S.F. to avoid overlapping development regulations. j Action on this amendment should wait enlil the Planning Commission recmiends adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to the City Council. further, the adoption recommendation should be conditioned upon-City Council adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Staff believes that the findings listed in the draft Resolution can be made in conjunction with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan actions. II. RECOMMEWATION: It is reconnended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of I.S.P. Amendment 87 -01 by the adoption of the attached, °.esolution. Res pe tfully s tted, Brad 8 ler City lanner BB :ffit�ko Attachments: - Exhibit "A" ;. Resolution No. = \., -.ITEM F aw r. ` - TIMM Y- 10 RESOLUTION NO. 1 A lIESOLUTIO O TFIE RANCHO CUCAMOMAI PLANNING C SSION r REr;:Oi t ka1, OVAL 'OF, IN USTRIT fL AREA SPE�TFIC 0-LAN .. REQV__ 71 LAND 09 Tift SQUTH SID OF r 11 iL4 �O BET�i6Efii EVAitF9 THE Ia1,5 FREENAY ANO` E,TIWANtfA RV£H 1 `6t ,DELETED FRAM THE I.S.P. ; a EREAS, on the., 22n& day of duly, 1987 an ipp'l ication was fined and accepted on'tha above- described project; and WEREAS, on the 22nd.da—W of July, 1,987, the Planning, Camissian held a duly advertised public hearing, purl aot.. to sectiott 65854 'of the G- iifornia _ rauerttent Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission- has made the following rinaings z 1. Than the subject properties are part of the Foothill - Botilevard tpecific Plan as reconaended far approval I by the Planning Comnission_ a` k '' L. That the subject property is suital le for-the uses,` permitted In the proposed Foothill Specific Plan in -_ terms of access, size, And coRpatibility with i t existing Tani use in the surrounding area; and That ti�e proposed disc -ict change would `not have ' significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 4. That the proposed district change is)An conformance with the General Plan. E SECTION 2s The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comarission has found that ' this proaecFMW=not create a significant adverse impact on the environment, and recommends issuance of a Dlegative Declaration on July 22, 1987. HN.. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:, 1,. lhrt pursuant to Section. 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby,,.. ., reconmendy approllal on the 22nd day of July, 1987, Industrial Area `Specific Plan Amonoment No.: 87-01, for the area to be removed from the Industrial Area Specific Plan as indicned on Exhii4it NP. I F_ P iii PEARN. a C RE : �Ta S OUt�t4 July: Paget =, ;. The PTa�ing Cmnr °scionat�y rooirsaeds that the City 9 a ave� an�'L lido k % s�triaY.• rea: Specai �an .2000erra � 5ub ect ,to she . City, Covgd "Vl op; ibn of Wndeent Xd44' q1- ;,and bS Fao,*1ij,1" Boulevard Sp ec ff S. That Ce�ijeG�Gia phis Resaltution and rel]at�.k mater1 he�', adoe by fire P�1aRl�;,ng 'C%iais ion ,I + - APPROYEt ; ADORTFU 111M 22ND"'Ti'A e aUEY, 1387. -, PANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCW CUCAMONGA BY Larry T. ft fel, Chairman ATTEST: u er., epu y Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy. Secretary of the Planning Goissio» o the City of E Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resrylutfoo was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning,Com� ss3on of the City of Rancho C�camonga, at a regular meting of the Planning Cor�ai'ssion held on the 22nd day ,f July, 1387, by the following vote -to -wit: APES: i COMISSIONERS: - NOES: z'- wiSSION €Rds ABSENT; COMbISS�`ONERS; 11 FE �� x n -, ALJ L] -_r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM©NGA cA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 22, 1987 F TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Kraal, Assistant Civil Engineer ONW \1, SUBJECT: ENVIRNTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 5996 - DA ID 'RUWDEN A subdivision o acres of ar into parcels in the Very Low (2 dwelling units per acre) Residential Development "District located on the south side of Wilson AvenuEss feast of Mayberry Avenue APN 201 - 181 -59 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESrRIP'iiCfi A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as ss flown: o6 Exhibit "88 8. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 22,500 sq, ft. Parcel 2 21,000 sq. ft, Parcel S ,21,000 sq, ft. Parcel 4 22,500 sq. ft. Total 87,000 sq. ft Average 21,750 sq. ft'. C. Existing_ Zoning:_ Very Low (2 D'U's /AC) Residential Development District D. Surrounding Land Usez Nor t - xis Ong s ngle family homes South - Single family homes under construction East - Vacant and single Family hems West - Vacant E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Cade Desi natinns h�' North ery Low 0 /AC) Residential Development ` South - Low Medium (2.-8 DU /AC) Residential Development East Very Low (2 OU /AC) Residential Development West - Very Low (2 DU /AC) Residential Development G ITEM" r. '... i r, •tip l� PCSR TENT. PARCEL t9r'lP` 6996 JULY ;i2, 1887 PAGE 2 1 , r, F. S tei'CCharacteristics: Thef`site is vxtant and slopes pproximately 8% in a southerly d rf %tion. rr ` II. ANALYSIS. A. General: e, 0 The purpose of this parcel map is to create four parcels for the future development of individual single family homes. The Parcels I i as proposed do not meet current Development Code standards for average depth; size and therefore a related variance (`,EA 87 -08) is on tonight's agenda for the Comtrission's consideration. Approval of the Parcel Map is contingent upon approval of the variance. The site is located within the 12 acre area bounded by the site, Wilson Avenue, Tract 10827, and Haven Avenue as shown on Exhibit "CO. The area is predominately undeveloped with the`exceptiq!ri of the Ravis home located imnediately to the east of the site. fl The f area is designated as very loan (2 du /ac) potentially -yielding ar j many as 24 homes. A street master plan for the area was developer k' with the approval ~of `Tract .10827 to the south (see Faature Streets on Exhibit "G "). Only one street connection to Wilson Avenue aligl:ee with Cartilla Aversue to the north was approved, hocause of the close proximity of Mayberry Avenue to Cartilla Avenue. The Davis residence temporarily takes access from Wilson Avenue via an easesnenz °ver the easterly portion of proposed Parcel 1 of tnis Parcel Map. The applicant is proposing to use the sane temporary access easement for the proposed parcels. B. Issues: Staff requests that the Commission consider a redesign of the Parcel Map eliminat'n the southerly cul de sac on the proposed street (Cabrosa Piace3 and extending it southerly to connect to Northridge place, which is the most northerly east /west street currently under construction within Tract 10827 immediately to the south. The redesign is shown on Exhibit "F ". The reasons for the redesign are as follows: I. The connection to Northridge ,Place will provide two means of- access to the 12 acre Master Plan Area, If only one access is aailable and becomes blocked, safety vehicles and homeowners have no alternate way to enter or leave the area. Also, it is City Policy to provide two means of access to all projects whenever possible. TX G 2`5 l PCSR �I TENT: AR MAP�59' dlii:Y h PAGE 3 2 It WOV0, eliminate ,the need far tiw = enporary acct s;connetti'on l r to Wi�lon „AveEape rthch is, updersir able; beca,us'e it °r�retes in addi' kana7 tr affi'o cgrifl ict .'poigt os� Wfi ion A ue s and,_ n ) add oval ,cros�sin.� of the CoMun�xty. �rra�, on,thP� sdAi Si s,a� of 11i1son A e�tue, In tK future, the dri.vewayt pp oatah on san AV, �Ti k have to °.be remo -yed and• replaced with taod`ard< _ = streets Paay, 'and l improvements, .traa and the ports on from htilso;t Avegtx tlros,a Place wa1 have fie beaqved' aitd regi�adad;ci^eting a disruption: to the r esidence fop parcerT. projei� as- propos The 3. Con+lnissioh `Resolution 8oaed would not canfom try Planning 79�07'iwhich'ere�uires a pai►em'eft width Q of '25 feaet WiW,n a, 410 foot rfi�ght of way to reach. he nearest r . City Ma3•titai°ned Ureet (;See Exhrr'bit "E” attached °). 4. Thit cantiectian w^111 eliminate the need for the construction and future maintenance of a s�'orm drain pipe through private property by allowing drainage to fl -ow within a public <strcet. '. In addition, it is noted that tW redesign reduces the average Tot . °, size deficiency, although a variance is still required. A comparison of the parcbl areas (in square feet) is as follows �a Parcel ;proposed' Modified Difference 1 22,500 '' 22,;500 0 i 2 21,000 21,000 0 3_, 21,000 23,480 + 2,480 4 22,500 21,600 - 900 'total 87,000 88,580" + 1,580 Average 21,750 22,145 + X395 % of 22,500 * 95.7% g8.4% / + 1.7% * Required average pet' Development Code: Two problems associated with the redesign are as follows: 1. The connection of Cabrosa Place to the south and eventually to Wilson !Avenue will undoubted attact some increased traffic from the south to Wilson Avenue, However, the amount of traffic is Considered minimal, because there is not a large attraction to the north: such as work or recreation centers, and it is a rather circuitous route due to the two 900 turns. is o G L1111T`. PARCEL i10 - :19 axy 22 1987 PAGE' 4 �3 Y 2. The access easement for the Davis rresidence wil) have to be }} abandoned ualunt &rily by the owner or closed by the City. It would be undesireat)le to keep it opQ:n and also make the street cornet is"on to the ;south, because it would provide a direct R; aced s to Wilson Avenue. It is noted that the access will be ' removed in the future even if Cabrosa ends in a ct; .) de sac in order to maintain, the single connection ,.to 411"son Avenue opPostta Cartilla Avenue. Conclusion: l \l V r The Commission appears to have two options: 1. Approve the parcel Map as praposed' by the applicant with the-. temporary access to Wilson Avenue 2. Approve the Pz °cel Flap subject to the requirement to make a connection to the south. the resolution for the project was pr prepared for the approval of Option ~ j 2. If Option 1 is approved, Special Condition 3 under Engineering Div'sion shall be replaced with the following-" 1. Temporary access to Wilson Avenue: a. A standard 301 wide commercial drive approach shall be constructed on Wilson Avenue I b. The temporary access shall be designed and constructed to support public service vehicles. The pavement shall be a minimum of 26 toide. c. A 30' wide easeeent for public service vehicles shall be provided by separate instytment. d. The temporary access to Wilson Avenue shall be removed and the effected trail and street improvements along ilson j Avenue constructed at the time in the future t hay an alternate acces',s is provided. An agreement to this effect secured by a 'lien agreement against Parcel 1 shall 'be executed prior to recordation of V* Parcel Map. h 1 l l yy a� 5 tme � ar ar Fg9 6 letea rc00ptemi 'l 131 at�Ve i 19 p apPNiGav� -„ mss° u � e � SU Ge 'nai�g yet o3atheee '�' PQ a �'� is pr be er ;RHta . Sva�' SU�t i�►9 We eyspapeY appr °V ° J• tia� are elate' lea` ep°'vt si0nti �y '• the 4atea apprap of pUbr Oa`Y ;r9 �i 5°iss tie ant'arati °n caced �r t @i nrOS pp : thrion apo cec NCv; a p� tea. at the Gah rata Sa1u . gyp. anp1e th e en ,i re �Q R Sp � Q c � 0 �° S* Crt to Y tee Z pY °peha5 a1s —t it is chi {icLf a of apprap s site 11,x' *At a face, aPpti aura p ap lase p the a t { °I` acct° °Yti 4p1 0Me %+Qeclar } � neCec�ta�n � tie�at� As \' ° {ttea, Re�pe�tf °�1y �, n al 6a�r o Ci-O hibit owl) a *� Sep' it WO xh�u M ai 'Vi °iri ��e Map Exh 4ia� obit n i Pttachm e5tts. Masse piu n No a 1 taP l bit pp vaA re C°e o��tio P�,�•ce1 °nom °f �' t °a ''ooh 'ied �-oaditi Re RecO��• _ F �. C7,Y OF 'RANCHO CUCMONGA RANCHO DIMON lu tF CITY OF *RA CI 0 CUCM0N(r'► ENGMEMMG DWMON - sowipA S TE EM M fPVRY r ACCESS FLAG PORTION OF PARCEL I RESIDENCE /� �w �r P" �_l,� "� t`i, Iyj'° � :�� __ ��• �� . � ;..�' y ` � r' \c ` ,c„ ` is � ' . y e 'r �, �� `�.� 'Sid �.� `� y. ., i .�' � �.�� ,� F � �� 1 i �� ,� • . t ��.x, � � � � ��S � l� t a �� `x ��QVa y: �• �--�- �� .. _�� . .�c�, _ s R; t L.Paolo. ,•r -pvr ,din t PRop 2 Nt, Rti:T, wAtAt: 1 £�t. GR. liD��ViL lq:: ar{� �9�..T •, t t lit TNt met pm 5174p eiC. e�G SL16P.i10i+o --�a C-f. hill Pm9 t.0 'j s��-teou V -0 CrrY OF WGrii rvr' RESOLUTION N4ti.. 79 -07 A RESOLUTION DP THE PI,ANNINO COMMISSION OF THE CITp OF RANCHO CUGtMOkA ESTABLISHING SITmmsION ACCESS n1PROVE4ENT POLICY. WHEREAS, the Planning CQMM4sion of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga dishes to discourage the prof4feratxou of` private unimproved streetr`Y,and WriER€_4S, it is necessary to 01stablisr -firm policy guideline to inform property owners of the City goals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 19 RESOLVED AND ESTABLISHED, that as a condition' of approval cf any Parcel Mao, Parcel Map Waiver, Tract Map or Lot Line Adjustment an applicant shall have access to a £ally dedicated and maintained C$'y street. Where dedication and improvmne,4ts �,b not exist, the applicant s.iall obtain a rainimua, of forty (40) feet of dedication and improve with twenty -six (26) feet of pavement needed street froritage to reach the nearest maintained City street. Variations from this policy vi.11 require approval of the City Elginear of the City of Rancho Cucamonga subject to appeals to the Planning Commission. APPROVED AM ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JANUAT , 1979. PLANNING COM TSSIoN OF THE CITY O RANCHO CUCAMONGA erica, Rc:mpel, Chaim;• ATTESI_� LAC Secrxtary of the Planning Commissi,�,rs I, Jack Lem, Secretary of 'the Planning Commissior of the Ctty of Itrtrtcho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution vs+r duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of January, 1979, by the following v.,te to -wit: AYES: CCMISSIONERS: GARCIA, TOLSTOY, JONES, RMVEL NOES: CM MiSSIOl*'ns- 'tE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL s,- _, VifLSQN. AVENUE op E K x a 30' ' 3 ry it oco Sr L Ll [ 4.160 SP I r ! ... f i � !f h 24,to�U'3F !{ 1 CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ma MU M E, NGDMKMG .4:WWLf'A4 16 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIM OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5995 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Hap Number 5996, submitted by David Bowen, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 4 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State Orr California, identified as APH(s) 201- 181 -59 �..cated on the south side of Wilson, East of Mayberry Avenue; and WHEREAS, on duly 22, 1987, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFGRE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COWTSSIOH RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan, subject to the approval of Variance No. 87-08_ 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abetting property. SECTION 2: The' Tentative Parcel Map No. 5996 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special ,; onditions: Ennineering Division: 1. The cul de sac bulb on Cabros4 Place and the temporary access to Wilson Avenue shall be eliminated, and Cabrosa Place shall be extended to connect to Northridge Drive to the south. 2. An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Wilson Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the recordatiort of the map. The fee shall be ore -half the City adopted,.: unit amount times the length for the project frontage. 3. ;4 ten foot wide private trail easement shall be provided along the 'est project boundary. ,RESOLUT.ION, PM 5996 Byildin4 Division _ 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, quaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to recording. 2. Final grading plans" for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building acid Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. 3. All slope banks in excess of five (5) feet in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of graVing or some other alternative method or erosion control shall be '.kinpleted to the satisfaction of the Building Official and City Planner. Irrigation shall be provided to germinate the seed and maintain growth for a period of six, months after -i germinat!on. 4. On -site improvements, necessary for dewatering or protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction up.,n any parcel that may be subject to, or contributes to drainage flow' entering, leaving or within a parcel relative to which a- building permit is requested.. 5. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and acce ted d' Practices. The final grading p ora Ong gr g plan shal'I k'e in substantial conformance with the approved ^rantual grading plan. 6. A soils report shall be prepared by a q!.ialified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. M!l1 e , Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brao Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Pidnning Commission held on the 22nd day of July, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISGIONERS• NOES: COM41;5'SIONERS. i ABSENT: ;COMMISSIONERS: . i yyB O rw V A 0 .,a rse S-u in A xxv Szu jgjj lit �`{- m p r WO x Utz] ts ems. 131= Y. 71 0 « qd _E M A 4 N v qn N N c qb `V C yq Y Y� 04 4 6 L N C q Q T ti N wf `C O �f I N « °$ s1 Ot 71, CQ, �O L e6YY V pp y� aG YM S� 1 CC qN uo bye: Yn L$ Y �W VOY Ait'sp �6 ■� 8a 6V YZ Q Nqr N O y a -v -u` HL'i_ bic iJ' 11 «C v G C O rd 3d �<S� A �1 L M. I .' ` Z N -2 y6, 4SGM � C N ! i�\l� � � ` 0 ol - b� St-t O Z zs V.L j{ C N O %Q..°. b - [ppT 2p =_8 rJJ c UM`f N tai KCd 6 Y'� G" Ask y 0 « qd _E M A 4 N v qn N N c qb `V C yq Y Y� 04 4 6 L N C q Q T ti N wf `C O �f I d.Q nx. AIRNL ti N A i N « °$ Ot CQ, �O L e6YY V pp y� aG YM S� 1 CC qN uo bye: Yn L$ Y �W VOY Ait'sp �6 ■� 8a 6V YZ Q Nqr N O y a -v -u` bic iJ' 6qj «C v G C O rd 3d �<S� A �1 L M. I 4e Rl d.Q nx. AIRNL ti N A i N « °$ Ot pp y� pa ~ C` _gt= S.d= qN uo bye: Yn N O y Y g C° Cl ` Y R 4 G C O rd 3d L M. I 4e Rl a —C ` d.Q nx. AIRNL ti N A i — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a3c . « —Amo STAFF REPORT r _ q O �> DATE: July 22, 1987 U > ? 1977 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Huller, City Planner By. Greg Gage, Assistant Planner e SUBJECT: VARIANCE 87 -08,.- BOWDEN - A request to reduce min € %um lot ern m n aim -ne average lot area for a 2 acre parcel In %4,, Very Low residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, east of Mayberry Avenue - APO: SCI- 181 -59. Related Files: TPM! 5996, TT 12851, GPA 85 -03 1. BACKGROUND: In January, 1984 . the applicant filed Tentative Tract URI, a proposed 8 lot subdivision in what was then a Low - radium Residential Zone. During the course of the public hearing :for the subdivision, surrounding area residents submitted a petition concerning the compatibility of th4 proposed subdivision with the surrounding half acre properties. The Planning Commission determined that the circumstances warranted re- evaluation, and ,directed staff to ijitiate a General Plan and Development District amendment to Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). The Commission considered these *tems on May 22, 1985 and recommended their approval. Prior to the Commission's recommendation, the proposed tentative tract -4s Withdrawn. The City Council approved the amendments on June 19, 1985. II. ANALYSIS: Th`�s ,proposed variance for 4 lot subdivision would crea a Tots of 21,000 square feet, and 2 lots of 22,500 square feet. The resulting net average lot area for the proposal would be 21,750 square feet. Since the Development Code requires a 22,500 square foot minimum net averags for new subdivisions in the Very Low District, the applicant is requesting approval of a Variance. Approval is also sought to waive the minimum lot depth requirement of 150 feet for 3 of the 4 lots (see Exhibit "B" for lot area /depth specifications). Addendum: An alternative circulation plan to connect Cabrosa Place 0 or r dge Drive is recommended by the Engineering Division. If approved, this alternative street plan would alter the above- referenced lot area and lot depth figures, however a ?fariance for Amhk net average lot area and minimum lot depth would still be required. The lot dep, and area changes resulting from the altgrnaraive street design are shown on Exhibit "CO. s ITEM H r� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VA BF -08.- Bowden my 22, 1987 ?ye.2 The Development. Code requires that the Planning Commission make certain findings before a Variai -,e can be granted. Staff believes that sufficient grounds exist to substantiate the necessary findings, as follows: 1. The size (2 acres) and location of the property limit' =the number of viable'piUrna'tive lot configurations. 2. The required access dedication for 'street purposes (Cabrosa. Place) substantially reduces the •,depth of lots 3 and 4, necessitating the Variance request. 3.. The proposed lot sizes would he consistent with mony of the surrounding properties in the sage zoning district. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Before grarti;;V a Variance, the Planning- Commission shall ma a the following findings that the circumstances before apply to the property in question: 1. That ;strict or literal interpretation of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code, 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances, or conditions applicable to the property involved, or;,to the intended use if the property that dck not apply generally to other properties -in the same zone. 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of the properties in this same zone. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation on ott, properties classified in the same zone. S. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing item ?n The -Daily Report newspapers the property posted, and notices were sen: ova 1'°"property owners within 300 feet of the subject p; operty.�, V. RECOMMENDATION: 'Staff recommends "that the Planning Commission cons er -aTT" public input on this matter. if, after such consideration, the Commission can support the requested Variance, staff recommends i doption of the attached Resolution. tir 17 "a _ eIAN�"Gi, REPORT r� Brad Baia 'rver { City Pt annex J, Attachments:e terron� ,ql iant� P,'", ° Exh — ArTft P asrcel Map 5996 Rosig to 0, *Proms , lift ,. ... ...uv`3 W,.. ,_Y s .0.i �.itJ�Lh•�- .. 'e.�4V'. .vim e.. .rz ,_ �+Yr. r.$h,'i. u d° . J. M. !l I L.SONS CIV L ENGINiEE R 7 l iOnY OF RANCNq CUC4?AONGA PLANNJNG DIb,StON '�. May %�, 198? � ±� �r' 87 �y PU City of Rancho Cucamonga 9920 Baselina Road: Suite "C" ! �' i Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91740 Attn: Planning Dept. Mr. Greg 4ag� Re: Tentative Parcel map $9W; 'Gentlemen. o herewith request that toe subject parcel map bet eaproved wide the following variations from your eatablt.hed lot depth and Sot wise requirements. _ 1. Parceli »' and 3 are,- .1roposed to have as area of about 21.000 S.P. This vari°ax from, the city minimum area of 22,300 ;n1. At* variance is= �44uestod bicsaa* of the phj,sival a.enstraints of the size of the property, and L,ecauso most neighboring propertie4 to the hest and North are 20.0008!. i 2. a depth of 'parcels: within this parcel map do K nGt meet. the city minimum of 130' because of the proposed 'street pattern is the area and because of,lta physical six *. The dedications mad* force this property "'Z _ to violate tleeas miaisums. We request Qoer approval-of - a Varian a -Allowing us to haws ,less than 1506 lot rya depth. Pteasa approve the above varla meow is concert with yonr j approvsk at the Tentative Parcel Map 5CUS. Very trm3y yours. J.11. MSON ClVtL 21101*18R a t.nrporati, a l/ ay: Jsroae X. *ilson Pre�aiden� JHW : pd >„ )1� I'? nN 1-04Z m d a� Y>r� 1 2rae r_rz"'-' rZ r -tr- sue.._• N 0c E O mN 1 sC s f W � �i ii j. ►�. i �r A.f n v I "ifloGMC.� f 4 WILSON 1VENUE j*�!sl�t7r'�Ir Vlf.E CF r = •- �iA�c�. nN 1-04Z m d a� Y>r� 1 2rae r_rz"'-' rZ r -tr- sue.._• N 0c E O mN 1 sC s f W � �i ii j. ►�. i �r A.f CV —ll NMIli w� t Vlf.E CF r = •- �iA�c�. 8�`- O ff F. A►��- N= _ Mkp -AAN 1# FYY FMrrr CV —ll NMIli � L Pv � WILSON P#EmvF NOTE: DASHED LINE ''3HRWS r z -ATTUAL LOT DEPTH. I NET 'd(ERAGE LOT AREA ( _ {AUERNATI$E DESJGN) = 22,145 SQ. FT; 1 Ir (30-:� t 'rid �4 t NORTH ' CrITCF RANCHO CUUAMONTCA PLkr'4NM DMEM _ Ufr. . SCALE =�11I' 7. r RESOLUTInq NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUEJAMONRA PLANNING C6AISSION- � r APPPOVING-- VARIANCE NO ` 87 -08 'tu :;ttir7UCE THE MIKMUM LOT DEPTH 9,11 'YET AVERAGE LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS ON A 2 ACRI PARCEL LTr. ,',ED ON TN >l SOUTH-SIDE OF NILSPV AVENUE, EAST OF MAYBERRY 4YENUE 'A THE VERY LOW RESIDENT' AL DISTRICT ' APN: 201• =iB1 49 �- A. Recitals . ' (i) MR. DAVID BOOF -y hav filed an application for the ^ ssuance of a Variance, No.. 87 -08," desct'•ibed" above in the title of this ReSbruL)r:: Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subj4�.t variance request is referred to as " (ii) Pa 0e 22nd day of July, 1987, the Planning Cowtaission of the City of ? =ncho Cucamonga conductQd a duly notied public hearing on the l subject matter of the application, and said public herring fns concluded prior 1 to the adoption of thiL; Resolution. I (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoptioi of this Resolution � rat have occurred, t'J B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is "-nerehy fau^d, determined and resolvpd by the ffanninq Commission of the City Of ftneho: >ucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that -all of the facts i yet forth in the Recitals, Part A,, ;of this Resolution are trt :t and correct. j 2. Based Upon- substantial evidence ?esented to " his' Co ission during the above- reference July 22nd, 1987, , a.ring, including ►critter, and oral staff reports, together with public tesh;oony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The application applies to a 2.0 acre parcel in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). located on the south Side of Wilscn Avenue, east of Mayberry Avenue, which is Proposed to be subdivided into four lots by related Parcel Map 5996. b) The , pro1r to ehe north, a,�d scuth are currently designated for resadek'.O .s?s,, .-and are developed with 3-Ingle family dwellings. The Properties to the east and Nest are designated for resdential uses, and are vacant, except for one s"- ie family dwelling immed1wx'ly east of the project. . c) T:te application has been sub*itted to allaw'a reduction of the minimum lot depth and +ai^.imum net average-lot area requirements contrary to Section 1 -1.08.040 of the o�dncho Cucamonga bevelopment Code within the fiery Low Residential District:: 0 r. t PLANNiNa Cot US5iM Z ESOkUTIl1�i A0. ' Variances 6j -o3 - pen nhilI Devdl'opsaen�t� ,) July 22, 1487 1 Page 2 d) The vt iance as' specified in th,,"applicatiort will not contra�Jict the goals or objectives of, the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan or Development Code and will not promote 'A detrimental condition tip #fe persons or property in the lmmedi *Ate vicinity of the subject site 1'or the reasons follows: as i) The creation of the sutstandard lot depth /average lot area results from the required street dedications. (ii) The property has unique physical limitation.:, (parcel size and location, dadicatV,,h requirements) that are not typically found order simila,- zoning classLfications. es Thy granting of the subject variance ;+rill not be detrimeital to the public heftlth,• safety or '4elfara, or gate call � in.furiaus to properties of mprovement� in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclu°i`om; see ferth iti paragraphs 1, 2, s and 4 above, this Commissior, hereby approves th(rapplicat oR with the following conditions: a) 'Approval of Variance 87 -0? `` �: ''1 be cantipgert upon approval Of Pa.tiel Map.5926. AM APPROVED AND AMPTE9 irllS 22ND DAY OF JUI.Y, 1987. PCANNIW C"ISS.IIN OF THE CITY OF MCHO CUCA+'tONGA ! 8Yc Larry T. McRiel, aeriliaR ,.. ATTEST• ra u er, ,, -u yy . ecre ary I, Brad Buller, veoll* Secretzry of the Planning C� iimzission of the City of Ranchc, . `Zong.�, do Hereby ceiti•fy that the forecotIg Resolution was duly and iotreced, PA3sed, and 3doptezi by the kanning Commission of the City orty City of F 3T -Wit at % regular imating of the PIanning Co±�_?ss'.on' held on the 2? -tW, by the followi;ig vote-to-wit: AYES. NOES; C"ISSIONEks'. ASSENT: COM"; ;SSIO!(l:: t-- r r-- GIl'Y u RANO:k � CUC,AlN[oxGA t STAFF REPORT A DATE; July 22, 1987 I} Tr : Chairman and Members of,the,�Planning lowission FROM: Brad Buller „.City P1a�t,er (111 $Y: tireg Gage, Assistant 0,anner I SUBJECT: ENVIR0194ENTAL ASSESSQI kt AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -25 KURK - reques ''a es a'STisF a gymnastics sG o0 w 7n an ,ex sting industrial complex located at .8636 Utica Avenue, (Suite 200) within the Industrial, Park District (subarea 6) of the Industrial Area Sp�!cifit Plan - APH:;, <. ,209- 142 -18. I. PROJECT AND SITE,,DESCRIPTIOW: A. Action Requested: Appr.yj4 of a("6n u'.istt,1jction O'�ditional se Permit to es abhish a gymnastics scb j9thin4n existing Industrial Park locate* at 8656 Utica Avenue ';Sufte 2001. B. ,Surrour4in nrandrU s aar Zo inrIct /ii, aven Avenue Overlay. District; vacant, Empire Bank, K- Ma,,'.** Center South - Industrial Park,District /Haven Av�n'ue Overlay District; vacant, gas station, l;�dustrial East - Minims impact Heavw.Industrial (Subarea 9); vacant West Indtistrlal Park fl „n °',ict /Haven Avenue Overlay District, vacant, abandoned golf course C. General Plan Desi natlrcns: ro ec 1e Z �n us ffa "Park North - Industrial Paris South Industrial Park East - Minimum Impact Heavy industrial West - industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The ",;roposed usti is located w_tthin'aa \ ex.istipg ,n us FIT`-Fark, viiich includes`;,a variety of uses (s4 E: ,bit "C"). P'• isently, % only builnlingt 2, and 3 are oc upiee_ Approval was recently granted for Conditional Use F''Otjtf e, '87 -11, Which allowed the Elks Lcdge, to establish a 4aternal meeting facility within building 3. . ITEM i T 777" 7 PL 'T R'S, AFF RE PORT, 711;U Cop 0-2-5 Jul 22, it, Page 2 - PARKING CALCUL ONS: % Num6er of Number of T yo Squart Parking:, Spaces Spa.,-As of Ose LGqaEe Ratio Re !2_Quired Provided Printing Stop, 9,604 1/500 19 20 11,600 111009 2 2 Spa Center '4�6 Drywall Company 1; 1/1000 2 TV Shop 11400 3 _4 Yard Maintenance Shop 1,460 1/400 4$' 4 Elk4s Lodge 6.037 varies 80(1) *Proposed gym- -6,000- -rastics school 1/i siu'4enu + Wnstructer 10 12 (1) The EVK's Lodge is-limited to the use of 15 parki�g spAceS dUoing .Sular businesi Oo��rs per Cup 87-11., Additional tpaces are used for lodge fulmf,,,�ions on weekends and ,during, t7he evening. F.. Applit.able RegtOations: The ��_Xqduei;rl al Specific Plan (Subarea 64-01-iovs recreatfonal-facilities [including exercise studios and classer,,)��'�,'�ubject to the approval of a Conditioni� Use by Permit tkr,`,Plann,;n9 Comfzsion. 111. ANALYSIS: A. Geyrral On Hoveaber IQ,. 1985, the Planning Commissioq rOproved Divel opment Rfvl ew 86�26, � to al I ow the devel omment of- 3 industrial a 3.4 ac're parcel. The project was the first P rt of -proposecf,� 18 acre Master Plan. The applicdnt is. proposing 'to .,,oe approximately 6,000 square feet of tenant space �jithin buil,41nj 2, Whicit has a total floor area 0 19,208 �iqudre feet. � li�e proposal entails establishing a o_vmnastics facility for beginners, and adults with the majority of Ustruction taking pl.ace primarily during the evening hours. Some Instruction will occur,dering morning and daytime periods; however, the number of students in attendance would be fewer than duriag,the evening ho"s. _are PLARMING.0 SSTON STAFF REPORT cups 87 -2)i, - Burk �uia� 229 198.7 L.,._. Page 3 5 �l+ jf As with other proposals of this nat� 1e, the two primary issues in this case are; 1) V)e availability of on -site parking, and 2) -the compatibility of the us 1 with other uses ,in the complex. The site was developed JtL a multiple parking ratio (i.e. office, light manufact+aring,`industrial), and provides a total of 114 parking spaces for n(1 3 buildings. Thirty -six spaces are provided immediate!y, a J,acent. or near building 2. The PevOopimtent Code regtui:res 1 p ;king space per 3 students, pl us ` (i space .per., instructor for �commer6f ai schools. The current proposal would result in a '�ximun of 18 students acid 4 instructors, at, any tine, with ;:,rt'sultant parking requirement of 10 spaces. The current on -site iparkiiT4 of 12 spaces for this unit would therefore be adequate to accom odate the use. E' 1d upon the current occupancy characteristics within the cvl:ter flee Exhibit "C "), compatibility conflicts are not expected 45 a result of the proposal, The majority of ter. ;:ts within buildings 2 and 3 operate during ne mal busirtesChours MOO a.m. .'30 p^), and as previously toted, the-b, o� instruction activity= withU'the proposed gymnastic center wduTJ p occur after 4:00 p.m. IV. FACTS FOR FiNfiiNGS:,, f F 1. That the proposed use is in accord',vice with the General P1 an F the objective of the Development Crlde, and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea fin which the site is located. 2. That tha proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially - _injurious to properties or improtrements in the vicinity, J, i 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item his been advertised as a public hearing in Tti. <x ai y eport newspaper, the property posted and notices sent, to aki property within 300 feet of the project. VI. RECOMENDATIM Based upon the above .analysis and facts for fl ndi'ngs, staff recovinends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit $7 -25, tnrougn._the issuance of a`Regative Declaration and adoption of the attached Resolution. ' 1r u3 i kj Y 9 P -' dr14e 30, 1987 CITY OF 1;L4NCiiO `cuCAt+icxrA PLANNING DAPT. J { iYMM CUCAYONGA, CA 91730 - `1 Gen lemen, _r Dynasty flymnastica r,oaahing staff .conrFstu of iAstructors rune axe C.P.R and first aid ,certified,`AttetedIug, regularly schedules' Dynasty instructor meet ng.r, ;and attending annual U.S,A.I.G.C. and U.S.G.F ,coaching seminars. Gymnastic classes aare Offered to students beginning at age three years to adult, and 4ra- 11tered-at beginnin developmental levels to learn co.ipe',•itiote -level. Artistic gymnastics will be instructed an all four Olympic events - ..var.lt, `4,wbvea parallel bars, balance beam and floor exer.iae. Compl�imeng��y to artistic form of ",ZYMhsstics isc� dance movement. Dance inovement for gymnRstit`s will be 'offered and availtible to the youth and adults of Rvncho CLxgamanga. Another form of gymnas`'ics is rhythmic ;yranastics w1ilch is fairly now to the United States, thir� will also be offered. Rhythmic gymnastics utilizes harO apparatus j (such as h5-j,>, ball, tope) with dance movement, thus increasing � handleye coordination and increas; .qg Rracel and agility. All everats instructed introduce related skills on a progressive learning level, before a high lever skill can Ne performed and achieved, all built2 ➢ng blocks and foundational skills toast be ma;utered. This p=omotea an increase in safety awareness and an i increased success rate. This increased success sate provides the lee ;er with a steong self- 1mag *. At Aynaaty Gymnastics emphasis - i IL plaaad on ndividual self, accompliskment an4 self esteem. Attitude and 36ti l grown, e,n "I can attitude", as well as the physical achievement in ,gymnastics are iligblighted and maintained. gtaneho Cucamonga will be represented prof ass ianally by Dynasty Gymnastics on a local as '-well as in -0: national basin. After considcra�le d'eliberet,ion concerning parking, we determined that Haven Tech Center .marts than adequately satisfies our'V`arklmg requirement. r: i i ra i A I I Y ;.'; Dur':ir airr a�oa enaa° achrrol, lag houi a w4L havi a tctas ai' �t eiht�en'(8udes'aaohr.i4� 'I.,natruars -. - regulation ' ,r�`erqui�re maxI•m Par the G'hi�= ±��a.•s x� parkin a ace y er three ,C'2 ofti tin`203Pa�ccaa M0010 11) ) sti�d$nt�i 4,ad one (3) 4?► `' I•a paee per fa,cu ,ty.,mesater Or ampsoyo.e. r The 'saxes Te`cii, Center protrideia : thirtyuine (9D ',p4rkiri�, Acecrding to �iitr Po,partisiis�ate - share of` tl3a apaeas. parszel baxedr Square foatage We Ar *� pAi*p ftd t,�ie�Ive (1SI pa.rk€n with eei teG9 e�teh Burring our mcs.st intense uwve Fer�ioeis we easnply y parkins re u,4iit s sL Additionatlly, I wain liXG'fa po wte out that our:' P, a, use periods are ira the dvsn�in and our neighbar in that build[[ is, a. � dayt3'4�! user. r�� , 3eeand'1y, aver BAS allltude.nta attendfn are `ctro g UW-R t=sty G nstics �• ipped off, by tholr parents' or friends ,and pirsiesd uP -aftar classes are compie,f4d. I4 other words, the l0 'O irking spaiees that are required will vary+ seldom be u3*d .i'f ar -,all. We #4,a _emu, fins `'tkfo "Ply to your, rGVeXt Icomplete- it you ` haves � dai y questions or si:e addi.tionai, iaf'armatioVn, iiiease dogtt hetr � Otte to con'tact u . Thank ypu f'or your tibia` and positive Asak cons�� station regarding our, request for a -a, ua.e r ;t at g8�g8 Iltlea Ave.: #2QD, : Ranehe `UCe cnonga.' We goofs facvrirrd'to eo is being our ,+ seaety. with, the cit'� of Rancho Cu�eam �ma and fills � s bul��neaa e6oenun sty. ��. gas, G t ful ly, � B�seasrn Blackschleger,,13ur>k phi Rusmill Burk, drr i l AMAN �i i #_ 1 Dni t:td Sfiates i q�naas3 ies ed atian - *J. S. .B, hatioial 3 odern.in� body a cwmnast' s Sautharr; C.ui ?'Yr -nia Women *s dymnast es At aocscef #i>an 4 *G- t .A i s M-':44 tsfns:. ,And tszkgl`iLj -08 iacal end state � som a itions ss Internatiafrkl'S m ;sta ion era Calif,- arnia at Statl end 1 titi +tg;d Statos : tat Astaoetati ®n for Indapendeat 'GYMnasti 8ehaoia `ti.3., r - II S.A., ,S p.ro -9des in.Wtrurtkc Al material and updated gymnastics im n orpati A to „member sc oolsw i , OWNERS” �G.f Roseann Eurk=- graduate California ,Stat , 1 tech 3' arc U6ieeraEt p, Pomana; Baehdlc of Se ease Ds* 4e, Physical Educat�.c�n, Donee l�i:nor k; S..C.W.G.A. - rcpresentati�e`� Certified: Emergency Modieal Technician , "� -A Al y% OIL K-4-1 t 24, -At MY CF rrEut SJU mzz- P_ R UIO CLUAIMCMA Tau, CS cm PI-xm AN PLANNM DIVEM, IRXHP A. i HAVEN TECH TEN".'r• SURVEY TZRAW- N VZz Pau-% PrInt,Ing Z� ADDRESS, $684 Utica Ave. #1000 Rancho Cucamonga SPACE: Approximately 8,604 sq.ft. , Se! Exhibit "A ") OSE: A commercial printing operation including general office for said company, including sales and disc -ribuf or,: HOURS 0l9 OPERATION& 8 a.m. 5 p.m. PARKING REQUIREI)t 9.6 spaces lARKIWi PROVIDED: 18.5 spaces TERANT NA= i upa Center Addresnt 8688 Utica Ave. X300 Rancho Cucamonga ,,SPACE: Approximately 1,680 sq.ft. (See Exhibit "A ") USE: Storaga and distribution of spas HOURS OF OPBRATIONt Saturday & Sunday from 8 a.m. - 8 P.M. PARKING REQUIRED: I spare per 1,000 sq.ft. (1.6 slce,.;a axteded)..-, PARKING PROVIDiTs 6 spaces TENANT NANXx Banfill Drywail- Company ADDRESS: 8628 Utica Ave. 8500 Rancho Cu Mdonga 4 SPACE: Approximately 1,876 sq.ft. (Sea Exhibit "A ") i USE: Inside storage & distribution of drywall products and genr ^ral office use on'.y. HOURS P" 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. Monday - Friday (field work 85% of the time) PAMIN43 REQUIREIIz Warehousing = 1 space per 1,000 sq.ft. ('1.8 spaces needed) PARKING PROVIDED: 7 spacers l- r �1 OF).),, rr MLE,.24_bW,' 11-77-1 f . Cz Z) i� !' TBZAHT XWEtl Iwan'ts T.V. ADDRESst . S928 Utica Ave. #240 i Rancho Cucamonga SPACE* Approximately 1,09C' sq,it. (See Exhibit t USE-. `'Taieviaion repair and service location; general cif, °,Ice HOURS OF OPERATION: ,$ a.m. - 5 p.u. (One ma rpe,�at ?on) { I PARKING REQUIRWO Multi -use tenant_ bldg. where offiaie, area does 25% )f k,.ldg. area t1 not exceed `P440 per 400 Sq.ft.) 1 spaco PARKING PROVIDED: 4 spaces TENAWr NAME& Hanson's Yard Maintenance a Landscaping ADDRESS.- 8628`Utica Ave. #160 Rancho Cucamonga a SPAM Approximately 1,450 sq.ft. (Sae Exhibit OAW) USE: Landscape & Maink±na3ce! Of'fiea/warehouse HOURS OF OPBRA.TIONs 5 'a.m. - 2 p;tti (equ Amen, pick�'Gr p c morning .ind returned at the ,end of day) PARKING REQUIMs Warkhouse (7;sp400 per 1;:760) - ; ;.4 spiaees needed PARKING PROVIDED: .4 spacers Ti0!YMT tiMMs Elk's Lodge ADl7Ri3SS1 8690 Utica Ave. 1`430 Rancho CU- eamonga SPACE: Approsimittely 0,087 sq.ft, (Sec Exidbit USE: Fraterni 1, -lodge meetings, socii[J' funotions and the on- site $al* and oba'.'Aption of Meer, wino, liquor; dining and dancing for l0d$e;embera and their guests only. S OF OPE WTION's L: nch bate and evanin;3s :Manday = Friday PARK MG REQU IRED% Per CUP approval PAR -KING PROYID'ED2 85 spaces (evening) ;16 spaces (daytime) t rr MLE,.24_bW,' 11-77-1 f . Cz Z) _ ( ( pndkiwi ..n ' � 4 � spath, Cir pit. 80014. / .. .. .r NOR!; Mit{ ti ,�'xya• U4eacCr �aRalA�'� SRS 'EIooR Z`xE:'CiSF. �. j rna� z 1j • .� P.C2tuhCt �►nS --rr + �� tc�Xi�i ® � � � 9� t RESOLUTION NO. A`�KSOLUTION OF THE RANCHO --�GUCAMONGA PLAN] "NG COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. `87 -25 FOR A GYMNASTICS SCHOOL LOCATED AT 8656 UTICA AVENUE (SUITE 200) IN THE INDUSTRIAL 'ARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 6) WHEREAS, on the 2nd day of July, 1987, a complete application was filed by Roseann and Floyd Burk for review of the abova- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning j Commission held a public hearing t�-- zvnsider the above - described project. ,oilows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Ran?no Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1. That the following findings can be met. 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectiv< -s of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located* 2. That the proposed use, together with thb conditions applicable thereto, will not be r. ;%rimental to t!te public health, safety, or w�lfa•n.., or materially injurious to properties or iEkn.rovements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complier wlta each of the applicable provisions of the Devr'i.apmsnt Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen an at a Negative Declaration is issued on July 22, 1987. SECTION: That Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -25 is approved subject to e a owing conditions. 1. Approval of this request shall not waive bmpliance with all sections of the Industvial Area Specific A an, and all other City Ordinances. 2. If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible termination of the use.. 3. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and Sialr Fire Marshalls regulations have been complied with.'" Prior to occupancy, plans shall be I submitted to the Foi till Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety DivfOon to shtw compliance. `The building shall be insRricted for compliance prior to occupancy. 'L/FiTtiiz a 5 R�OLIDN NO. .. CUP 87 -25 July Zr 187 Page 2 F� �a! 4. Any signs Oroposed rg�', itie f ii` %iy shall be daSigned a confor anoe w 't Co iQnac UoiEOt rehensive Sign program f rr t and shall requi -re review and approvav,by the Pi-a Wing Mon prior'to ins� �ilaI Ion, S. The facility wall be operate'd in confor��pvv, With the p9rfot#n6e.. st�nsiartIs for .subarea 6, including* nzt�.ntst limited to, noise f)e ets' APPROVED AND ADOPTED TH 22ND DAY OF JULY, 1987T PLANNING COMRISSION OF TFitr CITY OF RANCHU CUCAM09GA (% By: CV, ATTEST: ra ri ou I I er,` %nu y eGk ar -'"'� r, BrAd Fuller. Deputy Secretary of the Planning Coamission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing.�esolution was duly and E regularly introduced, pissed, and adopted by the Planning Coimr ssion„of the " City of Rancho Cucamonga' \ \at a regular meeting of the Planning Ceasnission held on the 22nd day of July, \,.' 87, 4y':'`he following vote -to -wits AYES; COMISSIONER ' HOESt CWISSIONERS•:'' ABSENT: Cf)P9AiSSIONE ^; . 4) ,I f r f � 3 r CITY OF RANMO CUCAMON'GA ��cAnt STAFF REPORT ' DATE: duly 22, 1487 U6 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission 1 1977, FROM: Brad Buller, Citi 'Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13566 CARYF. 11i VELOPMEAT proposal to su v e acres o a d n o s "ngle family lots in the Low Density Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) within the Et*rmda Specific Plan; located at the southwest corner of Su nit Avenue and Almond Avenue - APN:X226- 111 -02. * Asseoikted with this proposal is Tree Removal Permit 87 -50. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested Approval of subdivision map, conceptual grading pan, pfiasing plan, Tree Removal Permit, and issu6nce of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 2.4 dweliing�L_'[�s per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin North Vacant; man Bernardino Res -2 South - Retention Basins; Open Space East - Retention Basins; Upen Space test - Vacant; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: roJec site - ow ens y Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Flood Control East - Flood Control Kest Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) E.; Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant. with an average slope of apprsximately 3 percent. There is an existing Eucalyptus windrow located along the north property line a d a row of olive trees along the east property 'tine. The pro ect is bounded on the north by Upper Summit Street and on-the Oast and south by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District retention basins. rcMY.3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF R£PORi ,TT 13566 - CARYi DEVELOPMENT July 22, 1987 Page 2 • IT. ANALYSIS: k A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 161 single am�Tots ranging[ in size from 8,500 square feet to 41,800 square feet in area. The Etiwanda`s'pecific Plan requires that, rots within the subdivision average 16,000 square feet in area, and that the Mini um tat size shall be 10,000 square feet. Prior to dedications for Community Trails, the average lot side within the subdivisi.gn was 15,008 square feet in area. However, wife the Etiwanda Specific Plasm requirements for Community its Tr along the north, east, and south:' tract boundaries,, the average lot size is 14,704 square feet area. In addition, Lots` 53 and 64 do not conform to tne`- minimum lot size requirement of 10,000 square feet in area - Lot 63 is 9,500 square feet and Lot 64 is 8,300 square feet. Staff has been working wi''� the applicant to prepare a revised plan to address these issues.. The applicant has indicated that j revised prang =- providing a minimum lot size of 10,000 .square feet and!i minimum average lot size of 15,000 square feet will be availal:e for the Planning Commission meeting, f B. Design Review ['�Tmittee: The Design Reviei Committee (Tolstoy, elm rricK, u ex )- rev ewed the proposal and; �4,ecanmended approval subjeec Gtr -the following cundit1ons: 1. The on -site realignment of streets should be reviewed by the City Engineer. 2. The equestrain trail issues along the north, south and east property, lines should be :presented to the _ Trails Advisory Committee fvr resolution prier to scheduling thew tract- for Planni, 3 Commission consideration. C. Trails Advisory Committee: The 'trails Advisory Committee on g-1 y r'ev ewed the pp d ect on May 20, 1987 and recommended approval subject to the regdirements for Community Equestrian Trails along the r<#rth, south, and east property boundaries. Following the Trails Committee meeting, the applicant expressed concern about the requirement for a Community Trail along the east property line. The applicant felt that development of the trail impro ,'Nents would necessitate removal of the existing row of olive. 'trees. Also, there is a County Flood Control levee located adjacent to the tract's eastern. boundary ttia4, while not designated for Equestrian Trail, is -being used for trail purposes. As a result, the applicant requested that the Trails Advisory Committee reconsider the requirement for a Community Trail along the eastern boundk�ry. r PLANN`IN6 C'OMr1ISSI01t. STAFF REPORT T7 13566 - CARYN DEVELOPMENT July 22, 1987 Page 3 The ',rails Advisory Committee reviewed the proposal again on June 3, 1987. The C �mittee recommended that Community Trails be required along the north, south and east tract boundaries. The trail along the north tract boundary should be on the south side of Opper Summit Street (24th Street) consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment (ESRA 87 -01). Also, the trail along the east boundary need not.be located within the tract but 'may be located on Flood Control property provided the necessary agreeitents can be arranged with the Flood Control District to the satisfaction of the City. In either case, the trail should be,locatcd at the botteN,of the levee adjacent to the olive trees to take advantage of` the unique environment. The Committee went on to say,; -that the trees should-be made a part of the City Landscape Maintenance_ District to help preserve the trees. D. Tree Removal Permit: The applicant has filed a Tree Removal Permit for We —removal of the Eucalyptus windrow along the north boundary and r;lected alive trees along the east boundary. The rA!noM of the Eucalyptus windrow and the replanting with a columnar type of tree is consistent with the requirements of tie Etiwanda Specific Plan. Also, the applicant has provided an arborist ,vt:port to address the condition of the remaining trees. Based on this report, there are six olive trees and one Texas umbrella tree that are in poor condition and should be removed. Staff suggests that IS- gallon replacement trees be required. E. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Environmental —ec s-f and found no significant adverse impacts as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with these findings, the issuance of a Negative Declaratibn would be in order if the Tentative Tract Map is approved. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan an everapmen'i Code. However, the project is not consistent with the average and minimum lot sizes of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. A revised plan will be submitted to conform with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The project, with the added mitigation ineasures, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. in addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Development Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in a a,iy'"Tteport newspaper and notices were sent to all property owner: YlThln °400 feet of the project site. \..s., ruy r•°•4c�' n PL•AN�I�it� �•, k � �F�i�EPURT ` {= TT 136Eo G Y '`� LO ENT L 4 ,Page ' V. REGQFi~IEi�F1AuT10N� Staff recommends that the Planning Commission , approve Tentati ve Tract 13$66-through adeptiort` of .at ac :ed ,',sae Resel'uti, approve Tree.Remova Permit 87-601 and-issue a eg tive 0ecl ap a an. Resper, fully submitted, ra 6,- o City P anne BB:SM :te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Uti;li¢ation Plan Exhibit "B" - Tentatitte Tract lisp ` Exhibit "C" - Canceptual Grading Plan ; Exhibit "D" - Master Plan 1 Exhibit "E" - Toe Removal Plan Resolution of Approval firth Conditions t� 1_ .. i -,F � r ✓_ - ,..�• ✓" �, a./".'" rte~ —��r� -- - _.?' ' ••�- � -' �� ry rte_` ,,��,� " _ s° ,y / /ter_► ""=- -' rvj.r COMM- a" MAW a mook Y�m Mae as ; �maee yen w m Km mm. Ars mmorm ssmr mood Tonum Me ftwo r " r ,:�2F— 'r _•_�� —Nor® Por V MINE . . }} �j ■ICI � ilil IIA I I I , A� I �,-j -11 rsfjt , L4 ft j ZVI 14/ Aw 0 9114. IIA I I I , A� I �,-j -11 rsfjt , I �,-j -11 rsfjt , 9114. ,x 737,; ' Orr. slims ' lu H, lll� I-- 4-v 1�11 3 -13 It - AIIIII tji �� . •1 y li a A � � q w x � 4 s • l l p b �7 tar. w� �. ii.��• �✓ t. � ,�� L ",� .' .. Will!- E i° RESOLUTION NO. A A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING, COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RA' -,HO CUCAMONG,A CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING a TEK DRIVE TRACT VAVP NO. 13566 .r WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13566, hereinafter "Map" sybmitted ky Caryn Development,. applicant, for the purpose of subdividing Cthl' real prooerty situated in the City, of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, desa1bed as a residential subdivision of 67,.8 acres of land into 151 single fara'ly lots located at the southwest corner of Summit- ' Avenue and Almond Avenue (APN: 225- '211 -02), '-,egulariy came before the 3 Planning Commission for public hearing and action on J41y 22, 1987; and x WHEREAS, the City Planner has'recommende.'',approval of the Map subject ".` to all conditions rvset forth in the Engineerinl:• and Planning Division's ' reports; and E WHEREAS,'. Planning Comaission has read and considered,. the Engineering and Plana Ij Division's reports and has considered other evidence ` presented at the public hearing. NOW. THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows; SECTION 1: The Planning Comission makes the following f- jndings in regard to en a ve Tract No. 13566 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific,pians; M (c) The site is physically suitable for tie type of development proposed; (d) . The desfgnn)of the subdivision is not likely to cause bstantVA envi- ronmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public heath problems; (f) The design of the "tentative tract wilt not conflict with any easament acquired by the public at larger now of record, for access through or use of thr; z, j property within the proposed subdivision. r %i f .� w PL ANN INQ C"3TSS°ro)i es,( �i.ti ON N0. 13565 1 TT -� DAR filxYEk o#�tfi� July 22, {{ Page : �J (g} That this prpt3eft will flt?t .create 3d "verse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is N issued. SECTION •2:T Tentatfte -Tract Hap No. 13566, a copy of which is attached arts"�is oereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard,Condiztions: Plannipg Divistona ' 1. Community Equestrian Trails shall be provided along the north, south, and east tract boundaries. The precise alignment 4shall be shown on the final map ya which shall be reviewed and approved by the Trails Advisory Coasmittee prior to recordation #f the map. 2. One Texas umbrella tree��'and six <,63 Olive tl''ees are - approved for removal -along the east property line and shall be replaceu�in klid on a one "fcr -one basis with minimum 15 gallon si;e: ;1 3. The Eucelyptus windrow along the nortri boundary shall be removed and replaced with columnar type ` t7As as required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. - Engisy. ring Division: ;r 1 The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications) on the project (south) side of 24th Street (Upper Summit Avenue) shall be undergrounded along the project frontage extending to the first pole off site (north and east) prior;to public improvement r` acceptance or occupancy, Alchever occurs first. Reimbursement of one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development on the opposite side of thr+ street is not feasible, because the property is in/ a County. 2. Nutice of intentid.! to form and /or join the Lighting and Landscape Districts shall be'filed with the, City Council prior to recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 3. The developer shall submit a request for the vacation of Almond Avenue as shown on-the tentative map prior to final map approval. 1 v NN 4, 119 page . 4� If the project is to be phased, the ,SN reets and �ith draigage .facilities to be const ,noted each phase shad? ' s approved by the icy Engtnder. 51 Alt tntertor loaa"t. streets shall oe"cQnstructed,wig a 36, foot d itrb se�parr. �tlnq within a �i{� foot r ght -.of- �. , way. Sidewalts shall be provided' ion at least one side. 6. Twenty- fourth Stmt (Upper Sure Avenue) shall be impro4 4d ftklI width to inciu`''curtt and gutter on the north s4de for the entire ;% gth mf the proj?ect�.. r 7. Lower hoop Road from the /test tr&,t boundary -to Chem Avenue". l a. Construct .the ;roadway to include a minimum 26 i4 foot wide pivnent (2 lanes), full fill rY embaokmen* for`,the ultimate roadway width, and = Pali length culvert capacity to pas► a Q100.. under the roadway. Ask b. if the tract is to be developed in phases: t: (1) Bonding for the total cost per (111) above shall be provided prior to recordation of the first final tract ° map, G (2) The construction per (a) above shall be completed prior to occupancy release of any parcels in any tracts i containing parcels south of the Lower Loop Road and /or the first two east /west tiers of - -parcels north of the Lover• Loop Road. The developer shall make a good faith effort to obtain an easement for the roadway, however this requirement shall be limited by the provisions of Section 66462.5 of the State Subdivision Map Act. i (3) Either the roadway per (a) above or similar improvement of Both Street . from the east tract boundary to Cherry Avenue shall be completed prior to the occupancy release of any parcels within the total tract. ry l 01 CQ iSSaON: R WO4ION NO,. 13 i FA RR ItrLQPMENT y July 22, 1987 Page 4:. C. Funding' assistance fvr the roadway per (a) above steall'be as fol`Iows. (1) The SiYstens� Development `fees and Drainage Aorea#e Peen ' frc the project may .jbt °tredilia towa,'N the direct cost of 6nstr%tian of the - _ �ktiort - of the r,a&- (inl�uding re tell regional drainar faeii ties) � acrd s the basirk= W so approved by the �ty Cou4ii x. (2) A post �n of the 41;500,000 off-site roa4 a}r; construction contri'bu on per COUWy' 13564 ` „ Tracts and 13566 = (l oco led' t4re north of this tract) ara , ,e credited tow.'; -±,, the y Impr�,l�,Awnt costs if so approved by the CCiite Council and °Co +,Imty. _ (3) The developer may eater into a f reimbursemeNit agreement for the cost _} of im pOovemerttr. from future development as it occurs immediately adjacent to th! roadway; Waver, If ' credit ,, against the $5001000 co4tri,6tion per Tracts 13564 and 13565 'is granted for Vase portions of the roadway, future r` 1:0ursements shall be made to the contribution �.. fund and not to "the developer. `- d. The roadway shall intersect Cherry Avenue as far v north as possible to provide as much distance as { possible from the freeway. Ik 1 8. The site shall be protdC ed' ^from off -site flood f ?3w+s as follows or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer: a. Ytezt tract boundary: Provide a structural block wall along the entire lengths, a miniMum of 2 feet above and 3 feet below the adjacent natural ground to the west. In addition, the pads: adjacent to the wail shall be elevated ,2 feet above the adjacent natural ground to the west. a ... € PLARNIRG COW=�N i t RE SO tTfOR No. TT 13566 s CARYN, QEVEL-10MENT .� July 22, 190 ,. Page S ,s":l b. North tract Wondaryt Provide a levee on the earth side of 24th atreet from the San $evaina, spreiding� grounds near 24th Street extendir ar niia�resterly. a sufficient distance to intercept _ 1 flows from the .north, nest, and east and not, x, divert flows to the-,,p roperty, the-,,pto the. west. The north 'face Of the I shall be hard faced and , shall have sufficiv, longitudinal r3 grade to be self cleaning. cr, East tract boundary TiW -pads shall' be eltated ,r "� above the Ive year, flood level within the basins % `F= to the east. a west bank of the north basin shall be rein, rced to prevent erosion from t _ _ flows entering he basin. r; 9. Storm drain facilities shall , be provided as . determined:- necessary by a final drainage report and ". as approved by theity Engineer. The system design shall provide -Q1OO ),roteetjon. A master plan ;hall. be provided for the Off-syte area to the west../ All i ,. facilities necessary to serve the- area to tha west that may be located within this tract shall be constructed`to the tract boundary. lit. The proposed storm drain within the rear of Lots 2, 3, and 6 shall be relocated to be within Stre ets J and K. i ii. A detailed alignment study shall be provided for the Loot Road from the west tract boundary to 24th Str&i< prior to recordction of the first final '' map. Ae study shall investigate both the current Etiwanda Specific Plan "$" alignment and the proposed alignment curving to the north intersecting 24th Street at Wardman Bullock Road. All necessary street right -of -way required, for the worst case alignment within this tract shall be dedicated an the final map. 12. A detailed alignment study shall be provided for 24th Street extending a sufficient distance off -site to verify that the roadway is placed in an optimum Iocation in terms of impact an adjacent properties, transitions to existing pavement,,and crossing of the San Sevaine Basin. ANIL t w ! ry APPitp11E[t ,AkO"'�M --' PW 1St1 .g Ay OF JiiLY, 987a y .ks PhAWMG COMM, °ISSF6 Of 149 UTY OF °ANCHO Q'OCIUlCi46A Al J i Larry ATTEST: I u I, Brad Buller, beputy, Seer rry, 'Of t4e Punni6 Comf4siyon� '-of { city of \� Rancho Cuoamonga, dot'?Y certtitfy iy@ fo. . Besoi utfior� wa s attd regularly introducert, P epapteq by h't P%annimg Conwi,ssio City of Rancho Cucao� at' a rtgt�i ntaeing bf the Flamm��jaeis i� .�O" ,!,_ he 22nd day of die ,Y 19871, by the fallawi'ng� AYES: COWISSIONERS3. NOES: COW, ISSIONER'S: ABSEPIT: COMMISSIONERS: i k C 1s 5. j . Ar W lu Ic 1 IF :O'♦C.N.�T �d 1 _! v `j r • 0�yµ' Y� . .3Yg ' O�CY ': i Y. YP KY@.� Y Ce� .. � ¢+•�3wp,_iy�.o aC+. +0°$Y��r,:4 ��.,�g'at`^�,. µa V�p��. m$��i ✓. I 21=2 sail - "!r. V -'j igfit lw= I y t 4 { yc °Mi. _CM +� Gr a ok r Iasi <'t` os is s,i,� le MW r al uS.�cwaa.. r yYY$�y1 � l i TT Ryo (� Y yCC � op bay y� ? tiM. M x �pp 4 j:i x° 2 p' a21 eS 1,16 `'v I "4 4 NnI W R r ' �co^ oil; g a .sg: lit' Z. Jul tlyNit t�Y7�i {FF Y Ci y M ��v T u ^Z 44 IT yy�c4� <i5 €� �S�35E Si�w Wit( KQ 2880 yip iVy1�t P�•E y GY..• M'."1 'e 3�tN"`L tlaG ,i.._ isYL 3.3 . ra °a'i`+�t`` � ^b i mO ISZ's ✓ L'C.tt nilial Ta E� =r+ IS :V O.e+r � 30 CIO M If Ma am GS Qe 7j a 11`��'' ♦ Y� }i dM� AL r .. y M��tl ft —S M � Y �N � l a v It—kit EU M G pR fi M41 V p �pp....�� _ yc ,p� Oyp ♦,..� ~_ bY. J +G�i `_ q� ^VAC. p� f' ��iL eyS'i��- � xyt ' " g '.~.. + °` A � % � '� N t►',j�, y t � ,r. � � }+. a at Lo t p � i'fi w^ �aT1i p��tl +w 01 spa �1 uc y� i#Y 'TIi A p y G• 9 y�0� yUU Yjt1E•i�l +"' �n+ lCyr.�0 Sp'ps.Yagsty. xeQi' i�; ytbe"is` ..`� $ wY:+ Ys O� V tL w+ Qv C O 4 fi +TM i �T � + ♦ t o � +?'eta ♦ t Alx_ + KQ 2880 yip iVy1�t P�•E y GY..• M'."1 'e 3�tN"`L tlaG ,i.._ isYL 3.3 . ra °a'i`+�t`` � ^b i mO ISZ's ✓ L'C.tt nilial Ta E� =r+ IS :V O.e+r � 30 CIO M If Ma am GS Qe 7j a 11`��'' ♦ Y� }i dM� AL r .. y M��tl ft —S M � Y �N � l a v It—kit EU M G pR fi M41 V p �pp....�� _ yc ,p� Oyp ♦,..� ~_ bY. J +G�i `_ q� ^VAC. p� f' ��iL eyS'i��- � xyt ' " g '.~.. + °` A � % � '� N t►',j�, y t � ,r. � � }+. a at Lo t p � i'fi w^ �aT1i p��tl +w 01 spa �1 uc y� i#Y 'TIi A p y G• 9 y�0� yUU Yjt1E•i�l +"' �n+ lCyr.�0 Sp'ps.Yagsty. xeQi' i�; ytbe"is` ..`� $ wY:+ Ys O� V tL w+ Qv C O 4 fi +TM i lu 4 Nw.NYN <Ma� RN 'NO t i 1 i g0� ~ >iVy • f app!, p} � bey L' If-1-3 q U� Y ina _g 3.q «36 Nbget! 4-2 1 -24. VyC GG 4 +. !.was! S= ^ E 3 YG�q tom. iY aM xs9 Yqp,Y r N"qQ O o r,NCul 4"i's �'gyya0 w^ y �A ryCN u.tr i y ^ � # +r � R �Y �6 N! Y r z t s ppp LC $a, m•.� N -u'Ot ..i+'a23 pr4t�iv � '1-a�. r'�yAp L yC. i� 'fi�� °•IC «t °"' .Ct{ au`.0 RCy"�iy�n1 i�RL ,� S�` N' Y .s1�� M Y1fi�Yara iv "R YtQ K4Yat� ? S4N Mp� '^R.V �57...�0y ry Kl 4 Ci F- "CIYp.GMya Nr V A' 6!"+ �lYi4N! a Q ag,,��$ "g`.P le yg Mt`4 �NiY 76. 1qG� + ! TT i�t gM•$i ts YC7 .pr_µ Y pR! tyV+MRV ��NTV~p. �t4. 2t� M ytO �pY- y J ysr++Ti�6��. �N�[t � �yxup. i rte{ l f 6GW C 4N.Y Wa ts- -4NVp. 1 I M i t .� o�.yY•1ts � z z � � � € € it __ a a{ q q 111 Y Y �'.ep l�N� N�gqff�.. V VYY p p�C! y yiR � ��y � �AT6 � �yy7 6LO9 G GYw 4 46 p p�p� ' ' o o.il `C NY� y y"iypD O O t ! !+Nqi Y+�p{ Y Y t• +y�® 1 L. r rr�I S Saty L'J N Ni 1 L X 5 54 La•�• � �'v g1 f JA Y y o+Z+eaZr s i g0� ~ >iVy • f app!, p} � bey L' If-1-3 q U� Y ina _g 3.q «36 Nbget! 4-2 1 -24. VyC GG 4 +. !.was! S= ^ E 3 YG�q tom. iY aM xs9 Yqp,Y r N"qQ O o r,NCul 4"i's �'gyya0 w^ y �A ryCN u.tr i y ^ � # +r � R �Y �6 N! Y r z t s ppp LC $a, m•.� N -u'Ot ..i+'a23 pr4t�iv � '1-a�. r'�yAp L yC. i� 'fi�� °•IC «t °"' .Ct{ au`.0 RCy"�iy�n1 i�RL ,� S�` N' Y .s1�� M Y1fi�Yara iv "R YtQ K4Yat� ? S4N Mp� '^R.V �57...�0y ry Kl 4 Ci F- "CIYp.GMya Nr V A' 6!"+ �lYi4N! a Q ag,,��$ "g`.P le yg Mt`4 �NiY 76. 1qG� + ! TT i�t gM•$i ts YC7 .pr_µ Y pR! tyV+MRV ��NTV~p. �t4. 2t� M ytO �pY- y J ysr++Ti�6��. �N�[t � �yxup. i rte{ l f 6GW C 4N.Y Wa ts- -4NVp. 1 I M i t 4-2 1 -24. VyC GG 4 +. !.was! S= ^ E 3 YG�q tom. iY aM xs9 Yqp,Y r N"qQ O o r,NCul 4"i's �'gyya0 w^ y �A ryCN u.tr i y ^ � # +r � R �Y �6 N! Y r z t s ppp LC $a, m•.� N -u'Ot ..i+'a23 pr4t�iv � '1-a�. r'�yAp L yC. i� 'fi�� °•IC «t °"' .Ct{ au`.0 RCy"�iy�n1 i�RL ,� S�` N' Y .s1�� M Y1fi�Yara iv "R YtQ K4Yat� ? S4N Mp� '^R.V �57...�0y ry Kl 4 Ci F- "CIYp.GMya Nr V A' 6!"+ �lYi4N! a Q ag,,��$ "g`.P le yg Mt`4 �NiY 76. 1qG� + ! TT i�t gM•$i ts YC7 .pr_µ Y pR! tyV+MRV ��NTV~p. �t4. 2t� M ytO �pY- y J ysr++Ti�6��. �N�[t � �yxup. i rte{ l f 6GW C 4N.Y Wa ts- -4NVp. 1 I M i t Ea"c yc��o. Bill 8 aip yNy ti A 8 �• Mei �M^ i' �ww qL V V,.. GLY AL a✓4 41'O uT tlg VL� C1f Ny �M.0 �`4ii Ce� p wT LAJ YY ` hqi N' i �i bNi y`O' Syy� i`+�• Z�N �' yb•_Y Y. q�yj a Ovr ". ^ �� SG A sO10 :wy�OO}}YYiy.�N M1pO{� y�O q��*� 10` Vi i. N6 tJ Y a °Y, �y'•..N. p," e ✓ w 3 Yao acs 'i •' t VY 41 Y ��u r3 d �+9t -3Q a�sypEi '�ct�� q Ww �vCa M G�6p .qG YL C�yO `. p �OYM.,ccag qpQ �i Y �CL �]•L p�,GY ^� �40 8 +*lM Ira.. ✓OyS� - �gG0. w.9 �J. d, Y:.Y<O' •v�+i tF� ^. yCC 9yi �yNy� yVVAKW�✓ �f. �r e� �Qq� a� €L �.yo�$G ✓�� uiE Tiryp}•a Yool�+Gi" a ^6a�t� w 4�' i E: q '" E•-^ ..55!! �i °5 O.•Nir s ✓i3 4 +J }' ca w } V N qt�0 8 Va`. jpN ,G M C �. Y ✓ .L (. C OC4 O�I�SS.. Y (aLai..�" �� 6 Y� L �. "� \O. CG • "�Nt 1KVy Gptl L ~�9w� yV qw Vn^ M z Y M�LC u�Ot .6n 0 HvG M OY aO q¢$5 lj C 2LOiG�B/�. ill bM� NaY$ CL� V6. L YCd +LO+��, y° Y Bill �. i e to ':Y y" iq NgNg� �++�� w � ✓ 6p gYy.6 o '. ��n $�� rs7(Y�w 5Y C�qy� �vC ate✓ vM�o C�aM C LG �NQS p %r at C -S pg G m tlLf Y p.. i.'s y� •np. TMt`. a i 6 y�j sue• i...,,. a i 01 L is VIM yWt31s¢,1 ,q, Y yy _cm 4w a C € ��y6 'J+•• Vr3 li YYyNgW yS1 w C aq�OM/G "qL H= Ell s 1.562A l' TVyv " J4i� •Cti F "w9 �•iA Z. ii/1" L f. QY7 °7� qw _ « Y^ � � 9b � ■d YYY! i1 � C fi � N 4 C G t;. f0. yg Y V aiT y }�,j6.dM N' ;0 Q$ c1 VI !4 9: IaR jt Mtn tl..a, ,• o�¢�,,�� a,�� °rte LV R� � « "%CSgn ,. tioo 4 � 2%. rye � gam« ^ {Epp y4 W u,418 N N 2j eu Y 4 P�J� oS$ JAS °�gst _ CL ib ^iYG V p�pmLr � �Cq� $''N .,.� � +�• �t'p ^�dl 91. !. s ai So _ jj I's kf b .0 axes C^' -33 qLM_+ Nil C.L 07;, aYtlaV G. C� WW C C�V L °uNAgagj z" °y I& ell wzi to to 2i • $. � � r 1O o C' Y s ar y dim O AE MR le "51 EON .0 TLI is m�p$ai� ' y� �Ya`ji 2M ^fin o� woii. s..'etlwoe AI fi WN W6 3a SLmi1 -0. < a w ' c�V L� % o c egr �i[ IN 1 ol �1tl NCc � W 4p L��, cO6 ,O C�97 /� V CNC �ivRy Ci Li+ \ N�Rd Mw ��w U CdLCLw w R 4 � � Q8}� JCwL iye 4 O i 6N bC Y� N q YNO�N' L 13�. �. p 3C E. $a yMr��iy ' �. zY �q�?F� LLynd \_♦ •=Y c~ii �L C ORM Lp QYO Y VV'.. N 6 N R 'L V'��' , �pR• � v�� w yM• t ZZ R.Y'd� MY 3w-$ Y;' .. wl\\. .! N C O ty,°VSR sP V Y Y 1O1 NC1: C.QCy� y •O CA M Cei `Y d� A. QU �W Eq i I d fLI L Cidp Lb i.os �Pi i . W ® p�'� f: d 41 O'O N A/ jI tl My1gy ` i1R y YM C V a� R� p h' � �O 3 � i ,� Z O� w• S E s w, RE {,,,; � V p y� w E r a L pV V�ud wTN p� N.wn w .4i _�sg CU C 1U� AL t� wCN 1W.1• � a A d i R f�� q t�afi£: no �i5 si' w .n ' L > wwLM°i� Y N u Y Y4 p ,i 0� Q1M aRe y�� .SItl. CL yd�., CEN Ell pW Nd � M`Ud NfY 0141 V-�g a i4 yT�ygL CdY. ' g0. �( O �O R 'O p1� OLOd TPL �•�M�g +R° ax«A aaY< •' .y�C� * ` = N M q' C j� w U o"* A R N- Y� �. ... iY D p 2.2 yS .2 9 4. q y � u � �� tlw �3 w�C ^� �3 �, Y� C c$' may► M ji3 s3 8 Y d .'. \ 3. y�yo.X_ ��aZ w•6 _ R M Y A i _pp� Y tI i �Qi - *2�TtTN I Q}j', ,C Mw ■ i �. 'tl 0?uy o iR�Cr• L'tl OOR a�d N� ■Yp V N Cps V�V E �O1 7 qi � I TC/iw`� all l . � 6 Y Wi ` N GidR ! CL. y ,t •a/yy LN.0 �Cwupfi NLL pC1 41 � � ^M�Yd IL.�4i N¢W M�rr. •C 6W �`L W ! t0 p W Y � 9M �VrrLa �. g�E t3•' p.nu .rr'� ¢mod Ov� f or°4y5 L 2L Z �O ff* « e a s a•.- m m - w j 1y.M 1`YO �M I q s -.3vu A` gLYO mag �Bp =CLJtiC +6 Cif Y S�V .a!••�Mt a b.. �M�Nr. VKO MNy ;;A is, .4 li5 MM N YW W C r �aaY i SI ��+K y4p ia,v_.. L9� Z aB.yymC .0 q� 4 i.CW ,WC Y�Na U4 V O. C • SNEB -0MM JOQi� VQ V N�4 �� B o N �. p cYa is wv V �� m71 •R 8. a^y V Y.K f1I �CCCCE Oi�p 'Oni6• L 4Yas yVa� yy sp IN.. L V•i 2. Cyr ��i�4 N uLjl M �' N a W a$p«H N wcl4 y.L 0 'y�(• �a1'I imiW Ni3. 4''l ��. qp Mr L +•I�'GN1 Z =��`p� •�pN O� 4± y ^B� S b �M�t`�l 1iu +pN TYa tR'Si q g �g C.J. O W N ~B ei i tl Ma M. �y O f•�iA +SSG tw til •O N V • g � h CQ � N:. Yi .M N j 4i s a•.- m m - w j 1y.M 1`YO �M I q s -.3vu A` gLYO mag �Bp =CLJtiC +6 Cif Y S�V N u MNy ;;A is, .4 li5 MM N YW W C r �aaY MpN C q� 4Jq�yy JD Nf i.CW ,WC Y�Na U4 1 nm �m 11 W - 7�F7 f DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: � �X LV�M%.04AW %JU%_1CU1L%J174%X.M - STAFF'REPORT July 92 19R7 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Scott ft,'phy, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMW - AND VICTORIA f.OMMUNITY PLAN WMWWMS/�UL - KLUM LYUN:iMKW ___ A--- t to reques amend trie Victoria community Plan --- feRt to reduce the minimum required lot depth on 3,000'square foot-lots from, 75 feet Ito 60 feet, to reduce the intnimm r(-quired lot depth or 4,000 squ?t- foot lots from 80 feet 6 70 feet, and to require a t t;mum ten (10) foot front yard setback for the livinw�area on 3,000 and 4,000 square foot lots I. ABSTRACT., Over the past year.'�he City has expressed a great deal W--$d-n—cern over the development of small lot subdivisions. In .,particular, the City has been concerned about the streetscape aated by the use of center plot units on narrow lots resulting in a proliferation of garage doors along the public streets. The William Lyon Company is proposing this amendment to address the concerns raised by the City and to.:,-,create greal:6, variation in the streetscape. It. ANALYSIS: A. Reduced Lot Depths: The applicant is proposing to reduce th6 required n U507-ot depths on 3,000 and 4,000 square foot lots �-r fifteen (15) and ten (10) feet, respectively. This will result in a minimum lot depth of 60 feet for 3,000 square foot lots and 70 feet for 4,00,' square foot lots. The trade-off for the reduced lot depths is the increased lot width that allows greater exposure of the living area to the street:. For "ample. a 3,000 square foot lot provfdtng the current lot depth of 75 feet would have a minimum frolt.tage of 40 feet. A typical center, plot unit on this lot, with the five foot side yard setbacks, would have 20 feet of garage and 10 feet' of living area visible from the street. If the lot depth was decreased to 60 feet, tt.e frontage would be increased by 10 feet to 50 feet. A similar increase of 10 feet would be incorporated into the living area visible from the street. Ibis would provide a better balance between the garage and the living area along the streetscape. K t PLANNING COMMISSIGN STAFF REPORT VCPA 87 -01 - WILLIAM u,UN COMPANY July 22, 1987 Page 2 i B. Front Ya1�d Setback for Livin Area;;, Within the Victoria onmun an, lets' are nq sped a setbacks for. the living J area of the dwelling unit - the setbacks indicated in the Community Plan are specified for the garage only (see Exhibit "A 27 "). These setbacks range from S -8 feet to 18 feet or greater (see Exhibit 4`80), in that no stitback is specified for the ` "unit, living area of the the Planning Commission has. through approval of tracts within Victoria, established a policy of allowing a ten foot setback for the living area of the unit. r While the ten foot setback minimizes the dominance of garage doors along the streetscapt, the Penning Commission stated ! that the ten foot setback should be landscaped and that any _walkway or structure should be located outside of the ten foot setback. in addition, the Commission felt that the second story of the unit should be setback further than ten feet. Special attention should be paid to the setback of the second story during the Design Review process. C. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the EnvIronmental checKlIa and determined that the requested modifications to lot ,depths and front yard setbacks will not have a sIgnificant impact on the environment. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would b6 appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to consider approval of this request, i e Planning commissibin must find that this Amendment is consistent with Victoria Planned Community and the General Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This Item has been advertised as a public hearing In e a 71 y sport: newspaper. V. RECOMENDATION: Staff rer emends that the Planning Commission consider alluterial and 'Input regarding this project. if the Commmnssion concurs with the Facts for Findings, adoptisn of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. ly submitted, r A er BB:SM:ko ` Attachments: Exhibit "A" -- Existing Lot Depth Requirements Exhibit "6" - Existing Front Yard Setbacks Exhibit *C. - Proposed Standards Resolution of Approval' ,� Jas 0 oasJi+ds ;;. t0�r�i�iescpp�tittsaAs '.. -' 1 CITY OF- t � ' 1i Zio PLA UlMNGA tj%lC. wk p� lu tau* 9 :R X k t'�� iefQ. feeP�ic��r�b�st. CITY OF P ANN , tr_ K K y� 3 AML it CITY or. RANCH CUCAMONGA ; � �i.i# T�iC': tii��l'�'I4� 1�1- �� ESN. ►.i� F. rE I * 3000 S.F. LOT CENTER PLOT UNE ZERO-LOT-LINE •10 MtK LANDSCAPED AREA CITY OF RANCFJO C TME� 4%smg!��,4- SO I '77-77t- PROPERTY UNE CENTER LOT LINE Or MIK LANDSCAM AREA CITY or. RANCHO C Mut MVMON Al RESOLLMON No. A ESOLUTI,oN :THEANCHO CUCAMONGA, PLANNING GQ MJSSLON COM6fE.'dRli APPRt%`': VICTORIA CMNITY TEXT TO (( dB4 NDMEN " J1 Ta THE COF9 ME'rY RE UG TiiE tiINI�4GM REE'QUSR LOT DEPTH "ON' 3,00Q= "ARE F LOTS FROM 75 FEET TO 60 FEET, TO REDUCE THE 141MIKS �i REQUIRED LOT DEATH.i1N 4,000 SQUARE FOOT ,LOTS FROM SO-FEET TO 70 EEi, AND TO 'R €QU3',RE A �lIUMM T f{ {1#3? F oT'FRONi YARD SET9a" FOR THE LIVIRG ARE¢J ON S, 000 AND 4,060 SQUARE FOOT LOTS WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July,`1987, the planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant tp Section 6586.4 of the California Government Code; and' SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby makes the l�ipg z n ngs: ,� I. That the Amendment will provide for devel opnf;nt cf a comprehensively planned urban camqunity within the District that is superior to development other+rise '1r allowable under alternate regulations; and ,1 2. That the Amendment will provide for development ':,• within the - District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development aHd growth management polici s "of the City; and 3. That the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by deveiopem:nt with the District. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this proJ'ect Will not create a signiticaht adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on 34iy 22, 1937. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 6500 to 85855 of the California Government Code, tirat the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ' recommends approval of Victoria Planned Comunity Amendment 87 -01. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the My Council approve and ..adopt Victoria Planned Community Amendment �-87 -01 tb moW.fy the.tommunitr Plan as follows: j k PLAtiN2# sDH> y�QpOPNO j 3 Page Ij ' a} The arinitaura :YeRtii^ect. lot dep €h 4r 3;Oy0£) square foo-i bats shall ue� feet,` 7 L t1. b) T}ie %t1lmam (jl red lot diaqth., on -,4, OQQ �vere foot T is zhali be 70 feet. c) The iftimum front d setI£ ckjfor tie first s story IiVUS area of the•,40 +i liegi upif si ail be` a ten # 10) meet'. Any second story shfi be settiack fume r than ten,(lO} feet subject to" .: approval du f, q De,$�,gn R&I&R, � d'. the tract. The satbat area, shall ba 1a dscaped and is . exclbstve, realkways nr str�•ucth es.; APPROVED Agg' iPOPTED THIS 2290 DAY OF JULY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r BY: Larry T c , i eel Ca rman ATTEST: Brad u er; mpu y Secretgry, 1, Brad Buller, Depart, Secretary of the Planning Comm isicn of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, ,do hil,eblr certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, paced, and adopted by the Planning Commission of tite City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July, '1987, by the following vote -to -wit: - AYES: f. ComissibNERS: NOES;, COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: a U-4r. _MA ' G=7THE_ --FELL4 -F- WORD JWSW The devplo�kmnt oT a r'7 7�7 7" - fa y consistIng of a worship Masrer plan Gnurcli K�v - center, office building, classroom building, and a multi- ding and a request to use the facility a3 a C HO CUC.AMONGA6 F REPORT ck-)CAHko. daycare center on a 3.87 acre parcel of land in t'.e Low Density Residential District 12-4 &ailing unit's per acre), located a�'\, the southwgsi corner, Jasper of Street and Lomita Drive%\ APN 202-OZ6-13. AssocJat.ed with this project is Tree Rep'�val Permit f,,7-34. I PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action equested: Approval of V�ster PI-An conceptual an scap nq plan, conceptual �4raoinq plan, buil'din; elevation�,_ phasing plan,,,Tree Removal t, and issuance of a Weg4t1ve Declaration. z North - Single Family ResTffe-AnTial; Denity Residential 1977 (2-4 dwelling units per a '.1 r e ) ",,, I DATE: July 22, 1 C; 8 W Comercial EIst - Single Family Residq,11`tia)`-,,, Low Density Residential 10 Chairman and Meubers eY thn, Plauning Commission (1.4 dwelling uniti2�per aure) West - Cucamonga Creek t_�bod Control Channel and Vacant; Ir.ity of Upland C. General Plan Designations: rROM: Brad BuIler, City PI anner ac North - Low Be -,rRe i�dential R-4 dwell'ing units per acre) South - Nelqhborhood�C=mrcial BY: Scott Murphy, Associate -Manner East - Lcw Density Residential '12-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Flood Control T,,, P".VT'DMWPMTA1 Min AmnVrrnuso U-4r. _MA ' G=7THE_ --FELL4 -F- WORD JWSW The devplo�kmnt oT a - fa y consistIng of a worship Masrer plan Gnurcli K�v - center, office building, classroom building, and a multi- ding and a request to use the facility a3 a daycare center on a 3.87 acre parcel of land in t'.e Low Density Residential District 12-4 &ailing unit's per acre), located a�'\, the southwgsi corner, Jasper of Street and Lomita Drive%\ APN 202-OZ6-13. AssocJat.ed with this project is Tree Rep'�val Permit f,,7-34. I PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action equested: Approval of V�ster PI-An conceptual an scap nq plan, conceptual �4raoinq plan, buil'din; elevation�,_ phasing plan,,,Tree Removal t, and issuance of a Weg4t1ve Declaration. P1. surrounding Land Use aad Zoning: North - Single Family ResTffe-AnTial; Denity Residential (2-4 dwelling units per a '.1 r e ) ",,, I South - Shopping Center (across. t'ase Lint'l; Neighb6th","Mi Comercial EIst - Single Family Residq,11`tia)`-,,, Low Density Residential (1.4 dwelling uniti2�per aure) West - Cucamonga Creek t_�bod Control Channel and Vacant; Ir.ity of Upland C. General Plan Designations: Prnject Low DensiPt esidehtiai (2-4 dwelltig units, per ac North - Low Be -,rRe i�dential R-4 dwell'ing units per acre) South - Nelqhborhood�C=mrcial East - Lcw Density Residential '12-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Flood Control Q, J, ITEM L 4 ' •%� "','�"?'' 'W`"�A"'�' .' S yam; .�' „4" ,. .,,�� pp-.� t A } �� •- PLANNING COMISSIM SUFF, REPORT - CUP 87-19 - SNAgtka THE'WARD FELLOWSHIP July 22, 1987 Page 2 ;+ D. Site Characteristics:' The site is currently vaunt qnd;,. generally slopes Mi northwest to southeast at tVCr e percent. There are, however, a fear areas located at the ssskith_ and southwest portions Pf the site that slopebetween 15 and ?V k percent. The pro�,dct is bounded on the, south by Base,, 'L6,e r Road, on the nortvi ;4 Lomita Drive, on the east by Sierra,1ista Street, and on t[T4 west by the Cucamonga Creek Flood O'ontrol Channel. There are s4i,(5) Eucalyptus giobulus (Blue' Guar) trees dispersed throughout the site. . IY. ANALYSIS: ` A. Master Plan: The applicant is proposing tea develop -a worship ceder, office building, classroom bui, # r.g, ' and a multi- =purpose building. The worship center 401 be single story, 8.950 square feet in area with an ultimate seating capacity of 650 people. The office building; will be single story, 2,900 square feet in area. The classroom building will be two- story,. 12,950 square feet in area. The building is designed With internal portable walls in order to allow classroom areas t& -'be { modified as class sizes change. The multi- - purpose building is, at this point in time, pus ly conceptual,. The applicant has indicated a location where the building can beTocate.;;but the � elevations have not beer reviewed by the Desfgh Review Committee. As a result, a condition of approval has be��,q added requiring Design Review Committee approval of the �wlV - purpose ;. buii'ding if the applicant decides to construct the building, B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee lakes dy, r c , routil) reviewed the proposal and recommended approval subject to the following cwditions., _ 1. horizontal river rock eleWnts should be introduced across all buildings to tie the project together. 2. The retaining wall along the south and west property lines should be designed to provide a stucco finish with river rock pilasters. 3. The planter wall,'along Base Line Road should be constructed with; a river rock finish. 4. The material and installation of the river rock should be of a high degree of quality. 5. Extensive landscaping should be provided a;hng the south and west property lines to soften the impacts r of the retaining wa71 and buildings from Base Line f r Road. ` a= = PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' CUP 87 -14 - SNARING THE WORD FELLOWSHIP July 22, 1087 s Page 3 • 5. A horizontal element should be introduced at the top _ of the retaining wall to provide visual relief. Staff mould also recommend that wrought -iron fencing be � used, instead of chain lir,;., on top of the retaining wall along south and west property lines j "see Condition 3). Planning Commission policy ha been to require upgraded yl wall /fence treatment along thijegional Trail System in the Cuc „amonga Creek Channel. C. Phasing Piano As is common with many churches, the size of the congrega on and available finances necessitate construction of t the church facility in phases (see Exhibit "E"). The applicant has indicated that the entire site will bw graded at'3ne time followed by the construction of the office building. A portion of the south parking area will be installed to accommodate the office use. Landscaping will also be installed along Sierra Vista Street and a majority of Jasper Street. With Phase I, staff reels that the retaining wall along_Base Line Road should be fully constructed with the rock pilasters and stucco finish and that landscaping should be installed air the base of the retaining wall. Also, staff suggests that temporary landscaping and irrigation be installed to prevent erosion and control dust until the remainder of the site is developed. Phase 2 of the Master Plan will consist of the construction of the worship center, completion of the south parking lot, and installation of the remaining landscaping on the southern portion of the site. The worship center will be initially designed to accommodate seating for '58 people and ten,. classrooms. The 111 parking spaces in the south parking area will be ader ;ate for the 358 seats. The third phase of the Master Plan will result in construction of the classroom building and the north parking area. In addition, the spate, within the worship cents will be modified to eliminate the classrooms and provide more seating resulting in a maximum capacity of 550 people. The'168 parking spaces provided will be adequate to serve to the ultimate seating capacity. Phase 4 will be development of the multi - purpose building. The applicant has indicated that the multi-purpose building: may be constructed as part of phase 3. In either case, the multi- purpose building wi11 require Design Review Committee i _xeview and appi!oval prior to issuance of building permits. r PLANNING COMMISSVON STAFF REPORT CLIP $7 -19 - SHARING THE WORD FELLOWSHIP Zuly 22, 1987 Pag1. r` D. Daycare Center: While there are no immediate plans to use the site as a aycare center, the a;rAicant has indicated that, upon completion of the Master Plan, they may wish to provide daycare sorvice_s for. up to :120. children. The daycare center would be located within the classroom building. The playground area would be _located Get the west side of the classroom building thus providing sufficient buffering from the existing single family residences to the east and north_of the site. However, the majority of the proposed playground area is iil steep singe.. A preschool with 120 children would require 4 minlm!11`' 000 square foot playground area (120 x 75 square fe4A per chilli'). There is approximately 1,500 square feet of flat area that could be used for playground, s:est of the - classroom building, which would only accommodate 20 children. Therefore, staff would recomn[end that at sslc, , time- as a rest oo s es re , a leap ca on or a e re +aUire S-01 tea A 1c1J oemonstrat-F now State an ME,, be me see condition E. Tree Removal Permit: The applicant has filed a Tree Removal(, Irermit reques ng the removal of six (6) Eucalyptus globulus';, (Blue Gum) trees. The trees are dispersed throughout the site '` - they are not part of a wirirow (see Exhibit "01 "). Two of the trees are located withiir, #'e proposed parking lots. One of the located in_.line with the multi- purpose building. fie three remaining trees are located in areas that are proposed to be graded resulting in several feet of dirt being removed-pr filled at the tree locations. The conditions of approval'-will require extensive land :caping of the site, Including box size trees. F. Base mine Landscaping: Two small lots owned by the San Gabriel Vafley-Kuln-fic-ipal Wafer District and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District lie between the church site and the Base Lune right -of- way (see Exhibit "C "). Planning Commission policy has been to require full improvement of the street frontage. This necessitates approval of easements from the Water and Flood Control Districts to landscape this area. Staff recommends that the area between the church parking lot and the fidewalk on Base Line should be fully land. aped as part of Phase I. G. Environmental Assessment: Pari I of the Initial Study has been comp e e y e app cant Staff has completed Part I1 of the nvironmental Checklist and has found no significant Impacts on the environment as a result of this project. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, then iss-aance of a Negative Declaration w5u -10, appropriate. La �. t 4h, dh' Wg yy_ 1 , J!uty t _Attachments: Exhibit "Ae Side Utilization Map ' I SIS Y,P -91T�S FF I Exh# t " " fletsledAite Plan � ¢ h pa : W11, i e 41 1' �pp1 I stanoai•d"s Ii CORRES00A news pap owners W Exhibit "F" - Bu(lding Elevation', Aesol utton of Approval with Cond V. RECOW4ND approve° , anaissue Resa�ifuT iY:Js Ir 'L OP, , 1 a! 'W 411 ; a C d Rang �h��`� � w � teot «r�� ; �� Ge am real �iy ' �� t L2 ocauspcantd Fo os� an la he n.�`�%'tpn,en� .Cod''1 _r1�'' Gk � t�as� bee adxe� tie ling aid tfiG..eor we e.;0 o aro ;pnvpe £ rl het aft a ro � ect site.. p P ��li�f r�cart�nds that th�,�Pl�„nnin� Com�m�,ssi`on tls. ,Ee..875, `Tree Removal Permit `8,, tod City Fn ner BBSM.te _Attachments: Exhibit "Ae Side Utilization Map ' I Exh# t " " fletsledAite Plan � ¢ Exhibit "{" - Concept -441 Landscaping Plan Exhibit, "R" "- Coftr#4 iah Grading Play I Exhfbit "E'' -Conceptual Phasing Flan i Exhibit "F" - Bu(lding Elevation', Aesol utton of Approval with Cond (Csions ...2 7�.7� #7 t-4 yM ((]7I177 a 4 uassm d3� � � 1 � • � j )All 1 = � •c I� s a asui t Y ° M /�+IbI"'CJW�il ��tiW�MF1°4Z7 , k. .n 1 u ldi �. at mot. �, aq Ila Ll ti 14 5it r u ` � � � � � � is a w''�.` • ;je 9a �3� OWVAT *UPI" ex Q R Q q d r-A m I Fit ))) t 1 ) s' �� YY it i a � I ' ?1 �� t 1 Cliff' OF UOUMONGA rrc \t: _� 87 A WTI MWTI r , f a s� e A C f � nj t i jinu ass w � d lo, 1 . :. � VAMP ii , m 2 m ip AOL ip S t c RES040TION ,90, " A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO COCAMONIA PLANNTMG COMMISS,ION.� APPRaVIN0 tONDITI�ONAL 0 P MIT hb. 8,7_1 _FOR SHPft G7 THE WORD 'FE.t�.� M[Stit LOC rEO �±T THE SOUTHWEST CORNER J !PEA ST!M' T, NR � 0KIA, DRIVE IN THE LO !d DENSITY _ R S, OENTT'AL wrikidt Am- 202- 026 -13 WHEREAS, -in the 15th day of June, 1987, a complete appl #- cation W7,3 filed by sharing .th`e- Nord Fellowship `For review of the above- descri'ued project; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd•day of July, 1987,- tho'�"taneho Cucamonga Planning ICommission field `a public beari'oD''to considew the above - described project, �o HOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Coamissaon resolved at follows: SECTION .1: That the following findings cam be met: 1. That the proposed use is �n accord with the General Plan, tbi objectives of t'he Development Ccde, and. the purposes of the 'distA' t in which the site is located. �� Z. That the proposed use, together- .-"r`th the conditions aprl?cabie ti�;oto, will not be detrimental to the public heal t►j., safety, or welfare, or materially injurious t,r properties or , improvantents in the ' vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the app licablE %provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2• That "his project will not create adverse imoa�ts on the environme -"aat a' Negative Decla-ration 1a)issued on July 22, 1987. SECTION 3: That Q)nd1tioni1 Use Permit No. 87 -19 is approved„ ._subject to- Fe- MITewing conditions..: 1. This approval is for a` church use, including a worship center, o offices, .clas,,.rows and a multi- purpose buiidinQ. The preschool use is not approved by this Corditionai. Use Permit and ihall require :eparate application for Conditiopal Use permit - approval. j i PLMN�tN& RgS6LUT1 NO. 5 « CO 87 -19 -* S jAklk ' ,ft IORD FELLOWSHIP July `22, ��W Page Z 2. �tiorizontal. ,river rock elements sha I be introduced across all buildings t'J tie the o3.ect together. The rzvi•sed plans sha;lrbe reviewe and approved by the City, Planner prior to the ' i'ss fance of building r pemi'ts. 3. The retafningM wall along the southa nd west property ]ides sfrall. `be designed with a sl cco= finish and riverr rock .piTaster and a wrouggit AM fence on top. The design °Of the wail anal fence shall be shown on the ffail, landse:ape plait find is subject to review and approval by thex My Planner prior to the issuance of building pe:nwits. a. planter wall along Base Lane Road shall be c =a: strut led with a river rock finish. The design of the wall a\hall be shown on the final landscape plan -: and is su6iect to review and approval by �the3 City Planner pri43` —,% the issuance of building permits. �- = 5. The material and installation of the river rok_' ` shall be of a high degree of quality. 6 6. Ex, nsive landscarng sW11 be provided along Oe ¢ south and west properh4 lines an' between' church site and Base Liae curb face to s,6ten the impacts r of the retaining wall and buildings from Base Line Road. 7. .t horizontal element shall be introduced at the top of the retaining wall. along the south and ..west property lines to provide visual relief. Thet )gn of the wall shall be shown on the final landscape _ plan and is subject to review and approval of the City Planner prior to- the issuance pf building Permits. i S. Design Review Committee approval shall be obtained for,the multi- purpose Wildingr elevations prior to `issuance the of building permits. g. Interim landscaping and forigatiott shall be provided.,, for phases that are to be graded but not yet ' constructed. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building, permits, �i o PLANNING ((OMISSION RESOii'TrbA No. CUP 87 -1a - ��ItlG TitE WOE i ELLFi9J5tiIP � duty 22, 1987 ege 3 10. The applicatri shall ot� thin approval frc a the San ., Gabriel Ya]Tey 19un c�W-` ater District ,end the San ( Bernardino County Hood Control Di strict to l t landscape �!�.e ar-p between. the :fiurch properly and Base Line with Phase I. The area,�shall be annexed into the City tandscape Ma3nt�jnance`District. Engineeringg ai.vsion: i I. An in -1 ieu , 49 as contribution: to th i future vndGrgroupzdi)g of tae existing overhead utilities (ttlecaraaitnications and electrical, except for 66 Kv _ ei,%trical i on the, project side of Base Line Road shall- bey, pair►''. to the City prSgr to • of ,_issuance � building parmits. The fee shall be the full City adopted unit amount „times the length from th!r' -- centerline of t,ie Flaod Control right =of -way to the cent rlirne�of Slerrr, Vista Street. 2.. A t4- iporary eul -de -sac shad be constructed per City. , Standard Drawing No. 206 on LWVA Drive to the `,isfaction; of the City Engineer, APPROVED AND Ai}&1#1D THIS 22ND 'DAY OF JULY,- 1987. PLANVIA' s C"? SSION OF THE CITY OF RW,;W CUCAMONGA' BY: arry ATTEST: ra. er•, epu y S acre ark I Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the .City of Rancho Cucintro , do hereby certify that the furegoi,r,4 Resalgtion was duly and . regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Nanning Commitsiocz of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held, on the 22nd day of duly, 1987, by the following uota-to -wits AYES., COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. ,3 1 r u 0. .V VN »w�3 p�,ppY LryryY ®O. N +y Ny�44r�tG� fly 9E11 ]1 w A iv EN q%/Fs Wyk ,•.3s w'�'$ 4 \`fi Q:i LS. -W V - fS N V iS L i N ♦ V aS�d'„e„''a v bit A ; 8 �� M. Z w yy M lip; M p yp O M � `N ' CX- 11112 J. °a a'ae 4 g :. rs .ig Tt FAY qrNL:k.5 a� 6 a E 1 .W.IC ffi y y, I Y :tlaIf��. sl o a Y Yli�. js = _ fags-: CHRIS 0 Q y it Is till-Ma's D F RE. a 'i 4 W, a's is '13 1 Gd cc a �i i U, :N sit df y3y p,Vy G � p 4 \p P�' yM¢gN .., pa1�yy4 4y Ca CK ��•5 Y��it OVRY �y�Qyt N JRi L { M r •qWW. O M..�4 ® K yyI� i C ft .v�e W�O I .N iyi lCMr yI�L�K��w INCA I Ay =° � CCC 6 ww� ri O Cos au -� t �- A is sb _ fSf lA iJ�!4� it a °$$ 1.,1 2P 51M Sh...'L Net 4' arc,. m K yd J L Qjj 1'w M44� L N M 4y �F i Ni `Y yam. 21 a� a N I Qi�i�rtt,,i ♦� 311 4�p"aYL l Of 5; ' ~ y K gs=z Kiska Ief 2 1 VEIj 4 y[ `c i 3- v i is o. 3i� pg� j� ygg� L L � h ii PA r. a v -4 gg ._r iv =31i �;j .3 t T O th Val ,9 S.,85. -12 yl law- 004 pi - - it! ai N-11 fzn, =-,;a - a! at0 i ju i ;2141 :fig -9. FUR gj mats? 31 d.v IV V14 • X_ At M u 1 4p- lit r 71 ! ov sa 53 1 I F to E w jjj Zu A-W 0-1 'as Act art -. .2 Lk m 'w= *yyyya= Mw O.S.3 -4 • M 3 v Tr =33- 4 E I URS 321 -a LA -C t� a•�ii v 1E r 7 01 Q.Mi �, a �Y W W 6 b W • y M boa. e as =��, j. Y am Usti Y13Y - w all L .�Y6 wN«� c �N S^ yF W �o � ]MS 4d.Y «•iYrYq�. - isY' =V.•H tL K §4YC Fla IPH 0i F YYu �..iE„ Yk�� $•r A a I• W ~I :J 0 PoaLY K � �s'. �� N ryry TL pC wT W'. `i4 X0'3 �yinq Valli A "82 M i•^ M y ��t��33333 y B 5- T Yyi" -1 ` NIA\ i q u - -- set W` wt �V • a� NN y Y e.w• �. M r y ®` a �6f AST Y� !'!.R Y N �C �•.w t � - 3buYYYWay •y�w ^M�4 •`�+ ^M'�•uiu4 � �1�= `;,Y11««icOWcll; N Y G,VS.�.. ��.1 WGpG,N G- 0� 3g'p ` Vpp y ■t (� }wY WY y.' N N w 71 V.•!. nt V_ i «go Zile ;pp ,,T_ Ulu Yx%N y w • �YSA Saw Gp ; 7f .+ Cw ; w 5 7 01 Q.Mi �, a �Y W W 6 b W • y M boa. e as =��, j. Y am Usti Y13Y - w all L .�Y6 wN«� c �N S^ yF W �o � ]MS 4d.Y «•iYrYq�. - isY' =V.•H tL K §4YC Fla IPH 0i F YYu �..iE„ Yk�� $•r A a I• W ~I :J 0 PoaLY K � �s'. �� N ryry TL pC wT W'. `i4 X0'3 �yinq Valli A "82 M i•^ M y ��t��33333 y B 5- T Yyi" -1 ` NIA\ i q u - -- set W` wt �V • a� NN y Y e.w• �. M r y ®` a �6f AST Y� !'!.R Y N �C �•.w t � - 3buYYYWay •y�w ^M�4 •`�+ ^M'�•uiu4 � �1�= `;,Y11««icOWcll; N Y G,VS.�.. ��.1 WGpG,N G- 0� 3g'p ` Vpp y ■t (� }wY WY y.' N N w 71 V.•!. nt V_ yy fj }�y Y 000 N O.Y V C Y Y f( ri cc l Y �. It W... � +'� 'S ��e fr 4 ywG» l Rtl'I� f� ILL •N' _ Y »i Y C f � _ !X F� At 0.h p� MIN Su KM4. $ a p.Hq,w M H N + •��j�Q �� za i p1 ! w.. {.f Oi'.r ok YYY 1� Q5 t �3$ -2 21 tal 51 rve o y:yR s _ pS LON 1% °°� #i} tb �.y ya R �wy1`a g ' #"y��A :29- iI •i `qLL4 +a yy �S Y` § N�1 rp. {c�LAr LQ.1 az �Ytl Y ' +�r p Y y» aY1 YYYu 9 �_a� YLyy'y�y..� p� y!w `Y _8- ��fy �:. Y1 °h {�•�. CgO�i• I �4pw aa ..y It, + e� p .2,23 day y� 6Yl py ^• Y i _{ � 0 4w 0 � Y« M^�'�r CU-VISI .0 y f b. i ,a w a M„ N •• yt r }/ M N MR 'scia g` ark u 1 ` , T'�` ,.•y. ..L N 3 & i Nk C 1 vo Eat * $ ZIe CCC ^ j' : ", ! g� 2 r 12 aofis(a ai+� Ll •W r � v Z YL�, -Y µ wty a 3c •+ $ w aye { a a+ to �$G'N'rjVu 1� 's` �gby bO 24, �. ui .' M' 4.1a 3-� 5s� IC ,a w a M„ N •• yt r }/ M N MR 'scia g` ark u 1 ` , T'�` ,.•y. ..L N 3 & i Nk C 1 vo Eat * $ ZIe CCC ^ j' : ", ! g� 2 r 12 aofis(a ai+� Ll •W r � v Z YL�, -Y µ wty a 3c •+ $ a +It a "2S V is— pit, by. il O w Lar TANA `` f.{ 17r . . _, � Vyy'a ��ti W wit -- LtL ♦" 4 �t «w } h 1 Q �t +� Rol °O ME $'C ;Uri, RO. ` air . Y SEE SL Q�L xY wa fTy "ii�� at o Alf- Six 93 1 Val g. Lo 44 yy b j U-3 ON9� 4�Yt yw \\ AIL 1N ../. IAN �Ct Y$y MV P r Lj ~ � •♦t NNw ".7A�� Ring.=. m c iiiii mN� ri Z 4 me An 0 M -S _�Olt TAFF - REPORT MPANY July 29, Page, 2 E. Site CharattAristics: Ther site is currentl) percent-slope from north to south. The proj the north * ViA;ria Park Lane, on the sout Pacific Railroad, on the east by Rochester A West by Kenyon Way. I!. BACKGROUND: On Deceff .4er 10, 1986, thePlanning Cc TO XF-H-Teveloj?l�ant Plan for the Vineyards Nor The Area Devel%xient Plan,,astablished the land qso specific road alignments, Subsequently, the Pt approved Tentative Tract 13279 (the "super block the Vineyards North into ten smaller planning are rights-of-wayfor arterial and collector roads. III. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to c -family lots ranging in size from 3,000 to 6,C area with an average lot size of 3,748 siw The lots are designed with a larger streel shallower lot depth. By P-*�;raslnq this lot��c applicint is able to :214v,,,inate the prolife doors at the street by set.1ing the garage bac living area towards the,-,trtat �,see Exhibit Nj of lot-, configurations, �,io�vvee, many of the tract do not conform; t�ie current mi requirwnts. The applik.&.�t h,jso, applied for a the Victoria COMMunitY Mim 'text to address The amendment-will be considered 'by the Plann a separate item on the agenda. B. Design Review Comittee: The Design Review Cc Tolstoy,- ffuTTe_rF_r_ev_f`ewed the proposal and rec subject. to the following conditions: / ) , 1. In reviewing 'the front yard set4ck prop applicant, the Comittee stated-that a i foot landscaped area should be provided front property line and the building Also. the Comittee felt that the second be setback further than ten feet. Thl stated that the exact setback required fQ1 story should be reviewed'during th6'Desigr the tract. 71 ti PLANNING, PLANNING, 60m4T.,SStON STAFF REPORT -< TT 1.3445 - Y:IIIAR LYDN COMPANY � " July 22,. 087 AN. r=age 3 ' All front ya,ds should be landscaped and include ' ,A combina� ion oi4 trees, shrubs, lawn; groundcover and a permanq',tt irrigation shawld be provided. ' 3�. The lot widths of Lots 14, T5, 22�.Zndj)23 should be 'City incre&sed consistent with` pail } c.* -.:f providing wider cot ter lots allowing far greitii -Yiorner side•- a- ,y �asr--d.setbacks. Lots 11, 18, 19 and �96 are wider than would be) required by the City and can be reduced to provi-de/the available land area to widen Lots 14, 15, 22 3. and 4. In analyzing the lot size proposed by the applicant, the C- rmmittee noted that p the mtnimrm lot depth ' required for 3,000 square foot lots is 75 feet as compared to the 60 foot lot depth indicated. The ,, J Cammittee stated that they would by supportive of a t Community Plan Amendment to provide for wider, { shal T ewer lots. The Victoria C60munity Plan text-'--'requires that recreational vehicle storage must be provided for 25 percent of the lots either through space available on the lot or in an off -site facility. For this tract, t the applicant is proposing recreational vehicle storage by providing access, through the garage to the rear yard. The Committee discussed the adequacy of of recreational vehicle storage provision or if the storage should be provided off -site. The ti',atlmittee deferred this issue to the full Planning C�rrmmission for consideration. C. Environmental- . assessment: fart I of the Initial Study has beei^\ come a e v itre app scan has ' . . Staff completed Part II of the'' Env teonmental Checklist and has found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of the proposal. If the I.ng Commission concurs with these findings, then issuance of a A Negative Declaration would be appropriate. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Victoria anne community—and the General Plan. The p;•oject will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, together with the recommended conditions of approval, is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Community, the OevO opment Code and City. standards. } v V. gORRE -SPt1 has 'been aeiit rti5ed in The a i �ec'f� r newspaper aspral tic hearing Banc atisces word set o ot�ne. si;tian)Otixfeet of th` e pojeot rsiev.` VI. REC", EMAM 10,*, -4 St#f ;1^aa ids that ih� PtaQr� 6s�sicw� a rgss a reore ibna ehicl'e stprage issueh aRy'� necessarf,,,�candd �t egos .After ct61,ila -st qg he ai "o,�eme tio�'a�. lsrs a, staff reco�raanc "that the PYirninq Gonissi ?on app'avd Tntatl�e Tract !3445 and issue a, ega ive`tle;laration.' n ' RespSqfullY, submitted rad 8 er City anner BB :SMvie Attachments: Exhibit n9 - Location (dap .' Exhibit "B" - Te:ttative Tract ,Map Exhibit "G" - cut``''ptaal Product Type Exhibit "B" - WL,/Otual LaWdscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions *i L' d J, wiorrsw yea^ =31 . 31 qw CITY or. KANclio °ball i i CUB "MN r. 4. ... . ...... .................. ................... .......i• { t r i lie. I n :Z jy as S crry or. RANCHO CUC.Ai IQNGA TCCL= r i Pv e Oocacvo ale 1 CITY F 4! Al PLANINUNG 'i �R F C rRr i`g }y Is �x �a crry Of. RANCHO cLT�r _ ,'Nt nn:cxv M-/ e F77 •r mniwei� w � 3�4 �. ♦ w 'Yr �i. �r �a' i�� ♦w igr� i a CITY OF • ...�^�#p .,,� d �G �.lE �.tri Qi�TCH 4f L`a'KWJ4��[ L. T i�i• - AM(\C 1vt'\ �, ..i��r6�l i— /�� J..�.�i.aJ 771 -1 -- al. jl CITY 01.1 ULM. RANCP ,10 CUC&MONLGA MqLj q- W-M 4 cif 01.7 a �h =-AM, p 5 IS --- n 4 cif 01.7 r r i (9p x ,i t t I l CITY ol. R MEN ANCHO Cl- TrrLF., r' --•�,f . J ;n �• w rr A + 1 r .,, , r '3 s A i ! Q � e r his ib r CITY 01. RANCIJO c CUCAIM(XNGA Kati-vg �i i .. n emir i t 717 -7 u ,�� s RESOLiiTiox No. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING,COMISSION, ON, THE CITY OF RANCH `6CAIdONGA, CALIFORNIA COMPITTCNALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE 'TRACT FLAP Nb. 13445 WHEREAS,' TPntati?' ? Tract Map, No. 13445, hereinafter "Map" submitted by The William Lyon Company, applicant, for `,„4e purpose of subdividing the real oroperty situated In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San "),' 'a-,,scribed Bern4r, State of California, as a residential subdivision of 32 iPs of land into 215 single family lots located the at southwest r corner or Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue (Ay ?27- 081 -04, 10 and 11), 'before x regularly czme the Planrinq Ga4rdssion fz:_ public, hearing and action bn July 22,1987; and ' WHEREAS, the City Manner has recommended approval of 'the Map subject to all condition. - -set forth in the Engineering an-1 Planning DivtOon's reports; and yr WHEREAS, the Plann3:i`g ;Commission has read and onsidered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at Ue public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE', the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning 6mmission makes the following findings in regard to yen a ve Tract No. 13445 and the Nap thereof: (a) The tentatve tract is consistent with the General H Plan, DeveTbpment> Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistentw1th the General Plan, oevelopm_nt Code, `- and specific plans; (c) The site is physically - suitable for the t: pe of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avo;dable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; l (e) The tenta -?sae tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; if) The design of the �antative tract will not conflict i with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the 'the pruperty within proposed subdivision. 5, PL (iiNG O"I RESQ'L TI ON NO,. 4B - - -ILLIM LYON, t4. July, 22, 1987 T Page 2 Yy ' (9) That this- project will I the environment and Issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Trac attached MR, a, s her €ay approved SL and the attached Standard =Conditions: Planning Division: 1. Prior to recordation of for Tract, 13279 shall be 4 Z. All pertinent conditi, contained in ResoleeCron 3. The .approval —4 Tract a ?praval o € -VCPA 87 - 01. 4. Tkis,rtapts being apprc 0011., Any future propo :eve or more residential RL 'Ooiew approval prior t Permits for any units. 5. The William Lyor ComPanl statement for this tract j by the City Planner perspective " developers disclosure statement ._sh Ranch,, Oicamonga's a o►�e expectations -for develop types for this tract. Landscape treatments at de -sacs shall be designe into the interior of the 7. The fancingjwalls requir consistent with the fenc conceptual landscaping -`9 to public: view shall be t i water se!alaat. Fencing fencing along Kenyon WG Victoria Park Lane shall i grail fence along Vic•tori per City standard). 2 r 1 t�tlt€ uy Page 3 (l" S. Prior to occupancy of more than 50 percent of the b unity within the tract, the pedestritan. Trails sh.aTl be imprc_veA- with sidewalks, Tandscapit .rg, frrivgation, and low lexel` 1i;ghting. The, plans' are to be ° reviewed and .a'pproyed by the City Planner and the City Engineer. prior to the ,issuance of building permits, .. ;. 9. Any retaining, walls used are to be a maximum of four feet r 10. All retaining wal1s visible tor the general public., i.e., on the street side, of corner side yards a;Q within the front yard,, are, to be constructed of .a decorative material to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 11. Ali back of lot .grade differentials aiee, to be a maximum of 12 feet. 12. The lot widths of Lots 34, 16, 22 and 23csha1: be increased to provide greater corner side // /yard setbacks. The revised plan shall be reviewed and approved by :,^. City Planner prior to recordation of they final map. 13. The following ftems shall be included in the disclosure statement and shall be consider "Od during the design review fnr this tract: a. If two -story units are proposed„ the second story portion �ihall be stz�P from the first story. The Exact setback required for the secondstory sha'l'l be reviewed during the Design Review for the tract. The design and placeL"ent c,,7-two-story homes will be carefully reviewed to enhance the neighborhood streetscape. b. A minimum ten (10) foot landscaped area shall be provided between the back of the public sidewalk and any structure or entry walkway. Engineering Division: 1, All ,pertinent conditions of Tract 13279 shall apply. I r r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13445 - WILLIA14 LYON CO. duly 22, 1987 Page 4,, 2. The developer shalt pay the'pro rata fj�e for future undergrounding of overhead u�tilities�f"long Highland Avenue, as conditioned with-',.Tenta.-rve pact 13279, prior to rec.6�da rti i. 3. The trails �0 be mi intained by the City shall be constructed and dedf,ated 4)ull width incorporating a separa':ion device such as a wall or curb to define the limits to be maintained by the City. 4. A drainage inlet structure in the southeast corner of the school /park site within Lot "A" shall be required to accept water from the school site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. No building permits, with the exception of 5 model hones, shall be issued for any units within the existing F2MA Flood Hazard Zone until the flood hazard is mitigated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. The 2 :1 slope south of the school site shall require special landscape treatment to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City planner. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY Of JULY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: LarryTT. WcNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brag Busier, Dep Secretay I, Brait Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning C4;.�ission of the City of Ranch,, Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing s-: tAlutfon was duly and reguldrly introduced, passed, and adopted by the PlarfAing -Commission of the City (if Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on th4 22nd day of July, 1987, by th €,following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES. COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: CuMMISSIONERSt 3 i AT „s•'Y Yt «yL N�v i, N Y pSSV Y C C9ryp r'� bO ♦C iH� N'�6 Lp1 V b ♦.L+4tOp -Nq y'� f.\�1Rj Y,v na'S� ~� N 1V 6�wA ui ws Rr\ .�. � Y Diu►` y' 0.L.M �y,+y'. L o.e,,�� %g Y O ^ G >o `06n AC C pLopq yw Yi LC« 4S ~ c qy«q ail D —I— E i�{t jq 4+Kif �,w.NVq »fyT4iri1E gG0. C N gCAt 7�U ��y l9 abr Ems~ MYp j�M `N �d” !:- Zfq 1--- Viu OC. iLV. OY TCM pm MO V �Yp�. p� N�N��O 4�1pQ ywgY+� � It3p 1ofe" YYe!n Naal5v yCp H ¢ V jj` 0 �4ii { 4n 9 Q �yy Q tJ r_ f• 4 �.. v L •,� �. q V a es� � �xC P�Ni rg•^" yyNyq.�NR.�M 4ri sYt{i 4 p wr+ } NP 411.8 _ ei a^ $ N q y y G « 0.y} &M fiw 4� N +• O - GAY y a0.1 s `1 •pu`� se.v. .i sll yykornpyy 0.t ��•`s i��M ��. <NP yll{ a N� Y'L 6YAi1 K 11ACNpQ d Cu C yV��YO$...+.. n. d�.MC pm .uZCQp; r1+.RL =Oy V �Yp�. p� G ^ap^'^ E - � rr M� ■CCC� Y Y { 4n s qua 4 CY� a }°'► r�t Y.w�yll q i fop O E S IL aw. p p-=- �y OI Z.E S pp 4 a C Yy�pt � u C y .mil •1 j�7�.�• 9 6 1 �C{.fi ply+ M BTi 1U •• � M E O q �i ti ,y it:i Y C 2c 71 €l ? «g 4 Ll C y Y A •. H Y s F o Lr Mi g Lf'L NE a ^ ryyN v .d w.GN Y� wN a�y�� yL .y a'•+ t {1 p wJ d d - LJ L �Y c• iu N49 rsNea L Y yVM� OY CY: �, ONE .NNE �3.w �'�pw��a• `° aa�j} +�NO wig b'i\ G � C� Y4C qw � ^yw 1G•M S' ��a�ppCCY�� wN NYY ML, Vc pCL tD iiY �QY� «� �•_�� F j• , ilk; k �G �µ�4YY� <�••6� YL MY��6' �YM ti ti n 71 €l ? «g 4 Ll C y Y A •. H Y s F o Lr Mi g Lf'L NE a ^ ryyN v .d w.GN Y� wN a�y�� yL .y a'•+ t {1 p wJ d d - LJ L �Y c• iu N49 rsNea V i oo^ C W MUY iNLC °p Y�y�L }y}y ling ig `Y C9 G'}N V N`s.'~ eCMw•.�.GY r• O p�p M•� � � p� p. 1µ N 34-2 +vY d YGP lL s• Mme' g y� Ca 6�jg `p OY�iI + op/ L GyfG1J' �Idlr �i L L ~w V�6 �.Y: u��y. • YNM OMB �� Y�. ��{opS �j „T S��4^� ��•y��ay i� '�.aH «•C�Y�yp >V i•�19� �Y� a'`�C�PS Lis 4ySfiO �t,= 6"G`IL+ C�af��i`77C �G� > ° "•� OY��3'G JA �pp � ! NayY N ®�diY C f`�iwp �tl �r Y` ^ice a �•r3 e+*`� � °'e'rJl Y. •'7'< (Y� �s NLI NOt 4N ..l��V NAY4n� Fr+.VY�1�+Ne �•G'•�K 4S [ `j l -.3 E L Y .NNE �3.w �'�pw��a• `° aa�j} C.xL >Y ��Yi .52 ♦ d Y Xw Y p�. �j$�L S' ��a�ppCCY�� wN NYY S Vc pCL tD iiY �QY� «� �•_�� F j• , ilk; k �G �µ�4YY� YMM. .y SlO PIC IS >ttYCY yY�M �c Ppp H ° L w•�wMM � LG V Y Y L -Z� 'Gig" +Ty�y¢Y 3� O.sy} 11 g y ��GCj• cC B � i � � +�qQy .(L ��iIL� �L A Y• G T V i oo^ C W MUY iNLC °p Y�y�L }y}y ling ig `Y C9 G'}N V N`s.'~ eCMw•.�.GY r• O p�p M•� � � p� p. 1µ N 34-2 +vY d YGP lL s• Mme' g y� Ca 6�jg `p OY�iI + op/ L GyfG1J' �Idlr �i L L ~w V�6 �.Y: u��y. • YNM OMB �� Y�. ��{opS �j „T S��4^� ��•y��ay i� '�.aH «•C�Y�yp >V i•�19� �Y� a'`�C�PS Lis 4ySfiO �t,= 6"G`IL+ C�af��i`77C �G� > ° "•� OY��3'G JA �pp � ! NayY N ®�diY C f`�iwp �tl �r Y` ^ice a �•r3 e+*`� � °'e'rJl Y. •'7'< (Y� �s NLI NOt 4N ..l��V NAY4n� Fr+.VY�1�+Ne �•G'•�K 4S [ `j l -.3 E Nyl• R: 210V ap 'V OYt' - —0. 1 Ira T >° r `,.!how .. ;?.L�+ o �L Y� oN a, CY °M 4P L "fin �l a•-� .i a `tz' m ��S^�I $.. $ g,v 3"Q�° i q �{ Q • tlN� G. q� ^�a�••VY q �Q� yN�. 4 yyY� Ys O.F+ V� yq YNY OY. Fpp q p -0 74 C1, � w 11,L CN ,•� .+r�awoo�, -N� u �� °� •�•Y •- �� a�NiO =�aC a1N��M L y H 'Y0'pL ^��O{{ 6�(p1 Gw4r,"W ma gN O� � Y1 4ga- P LON yMygY�Z�pf pyj EE1.e� Y ~i0 s.Es 2 lu & A ba 4ZLN ° U.CMi� C�tC�y`M s xtlp�nS� G Ny.Q- 9�g11 �a� fit.. Y/9� yS �[¢�'N .4 L•'nQM{y � ♦•(� G'�r•9�b �T yam .0 `,�1� �}!� �y1 0�. gyp'♦ a Y 0. �y,,.t �, N M. l•q� �N..�y ��ItaC ^Nr �?} .ay'l�j`��'��.. qQ1 jy: G. n"S.0 3RiI•sD • O�+ aL 9 w.•G.$ Y rw OIrOK Tr We r » 4 aa'gpge }fir yQ �Yp3 n� C�55 ay� i its �Ti oft 'O 'i aGOg ,cy« �� —:9R ,k� 8nM" v CMC rCtlC+rL�. 7 L.y184 ^ r ~c + Y Ma q �, y4e �� 9e avDrO `�Y'�, 82 a� fig' •'�' q° M «YOE.'� tt N _ +aLo --a: $$ i vN� « w� °tae °S' 7,5 --do's u� "$ �i am'''ino '0 O1 y1 .3sa N. 7iaN °aa. $ ar u Tc+r N. o�' u; :� $— aid e� Y_r g + j5'�a WE — 's Z% Sig Y a_� r8a qq $I viu a Lwi1 a°a.. '� �$a:� �•rF 4 °G 'u va.+ N^� rn o 2-2, e{ 'wL�M yL �a,• w. 43 �gtlG $��" N =�.� �� •. �� V.�6r MO a,}a"�iv NC��Ni S-8n•�l - UZ Y4° V wow r••°iyM, V.6 �yN NN ,y�9 _ +Y6.9 r 6 tt 6 Ley cYylSYfqq 'srsdO <7 +3 @ al -%i 'WiLwYV� K" G lV P1 r i M ,� �1 5 - 7,, Mal =-5x-a "Z z uZ -v-m 1-0h S� 159-4 e 33 SOP Is Z sm. 9 u c—.-. V. A 2 :!.s—3 -a mix %—IR V_ MY._ . top- fli `NA i. O Et r, -22 r 4 z 32z. _1, E, -1, it I i: -Y r II! -. - L ig Z" -vz: xr. Z - & I . 02 1: Z�e mm -C - 15 Jrg z E 16, u-- . ,SIX k u b K pq f z MIS e a Ijj 23 5 . w$ q k L =�i 1P` y � ,°, Si�a ��$y+ � wiRY wa N`�% �uw Ni hit E OU -a LIS 1= SO z ZZ -rut Lj 3 ZLE GUY Q1 fit Ciz. 'S'. 984 iW t-6- ES IV A Ea _-A l e grimA 5 - 7,, Mal =-5x-a "Z z uZ -v-m 1-0h S� 159-4 e 33 SOP Is Z sm. 9 u c—.-. V. A 2 :!.s—3 -a mix %—IR V_ MY._ . top- fli `NA i. O Et r, -22 r 4 z 32z. _1, E, -1, it I i: -Y r II! -. - L ig Z" -vz: xr. Z - & I . 02 1: Z�e mm -C - 15 Jrg z E 16, u-- . ,SIX k u b K pq f z MIS e a Ijj 23 5 . w$ q k L =�i 1P` y � ,°, Si�a ��$y+ � wiRY wa N`�% �uw Ni hit E OU -a LIS 1= SO z ZZ -rut Lj 3 AdIL ' }n O S ~ si.Y�� ySf p4uLC .. �w4 dry ;P L s aw Npg6�+tCjt+I �VP1 y F S$ 92 c•. rs _� .. 'lfµ�u�w».� y� ,�`y�,,s.� �i•'x4 v sr` i� oy�, � � miff i-aR M y� .Y, 2 yy3 If u 4�S Y 0� oc 4 yCyr vP �� y �g M R � m r~ Mme~ y_W� Rpp W W 1ws ems. w wi�ao °w. 4 w F Va P p O C V VV 1l 'p +sM! LC y� 04L'C �+Va�t L V�y� �rLy MAC• � ny S �.6 Y rev�� F ! VwhJ�Y ♦� � ggF `.u� YY Y R��Y � Mme+ O M iFFip Y a A S X-01 s P tl ' L L %srEZ HTL � � V veil- � =-3.3 L ��N`` I. co C N J to l ply yS a AM Y iOy y O V V V F y Z� M �q yM4tl sw.. r- C ?m � 41 y � O Y� NL P�f �V A 8 1.9 VL MN rtVy~ N^ YO. qpN p� ilk M N�� »� N YVyyr 1]'ItL L V y w ya � �Jt g,aj M @� �q� N • N nll rt Era u ou � t � f V � y~y O p � C oC V \ 2f L m w. I w N Q TL o p R V � O N ee� Y Y� S a1 4 6 �rC As� F=NUi3 ts�N ' 1 .i" M Olt; O i 4V as a- ask im a yyO--� L Mav Q..CC. T cV� �Y6 3wi'iu�.VN. ^1p�Y �g i �g N EPG� �• �p. fiA -y-' wL.. L.CCt� Ay P'. ON4i tyll bW 52 <Y.1 7R r W 0 Y L "�` Y If L " .� M YCg w H Hp I +wCS y �t G � yC 1N�. N N Ij e u u` € €r11 " " rc�i +Fi f o z z° i iio�Wp'. g g« wK . spy R .. w w� - - , •� -9 �4M p R$ _ _ a` L L6L L C C� ' 'wO � p 2 ix 2% �4:� " +yylyyi+ -1ww = =", "r C — � �OAE 41 y � O Y� NL P�f �V A 8 1.9 VL MN rtVy~ N^ YO. qpN p� ilk M N�� »� N YVyyr 1]'ItL L V y w ya � �Jt g,aj M @� �q� N • N nll rt Era u ou � t � f V � y~y O p � C oC V \ 2f L m w. I w N Q TL o p R V � O N ee� Y Y� S a1 4 6 �rC As� F=NUi3 ts�N ' 1 .i" M Olt; O i 4V as a- ask im a yyO--� L Mav Q..CC. T cV� �Y6 3wi'iu�.VN. ^1p�Y �g i �g N EPG� �• �p. fiA -y-' wL.. L.CCt� Ay P'. ON4i tyll bW 52 <Y.1 7R r W 0 Era u ou � t � f V � y~y O p � C oC V \ 2f L m w. I w N Q TL o p R V � O N ee� Y Y� S a1 4 6 �rC As� F=NUi3 ts�N ' 1 .i" M Olt; O i 4V as a- ask im a yyO--� L Mav Q..CC. T cV� �Y6 3wi'iu�.VN. ^1p�Y �g i �g N EPG� �• �p. fiA -y-' wL.. L.CCt� Ay P'. ON4i tyll bW 52 <Y.1 7R r W 0 � t � f V � y~y O p � C oC V \ 2f L m w. I w N Q TL o p R V � O N ee� Y Y� S a1 4 6 �rC As� F=NUi3 ts�N ' 1 .i" M Olt; O i 4V as a- ask im a yyO--� L Mav Q..CC. T cV� �Y6 3wi'iu�.VN. ^1p�Y �g i �g N EPG� �• �p. fiA -y-' wL.. L.CCt� Ay P'. ON4i tyll bW 52 <Y.1 7R r W 0 0 `a ul N � ° d L w� L O QQ M y vt pe L V Asa Lvf �iM u ^rw yci A +! 44 V 4� Oa SON y 9 +➢ �yY�g t�yGgy {Y fl^ ym$w � �; iyl YyY CYC OYC� 1pyy O ♦ {{�� lOOi� wq. yi.. aagTgr . F 1r- 4�. Z.U. ZS N `u JfY aa�av I1wa�+' tar iii ? $ }>p1y �(:.Y� � sy rya ��J ICY � 1 � +�Ly�yL �� CCL p�M b� � y'�O..�M P C� 6�gpY 0��, ■p�. O x hu > C AI L1L�fr a ZOff W Rs t W K .:k CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � STAFF REPORT i DATE; TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT. July 22, 1987 Chairman and 'Menbers of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Debra 14eier, Assistant Planner f11FTRONlIENTAi, MESSMENT AND UON61 rIONAL USE PER -M TT 8b-Y?t i�r:rras mAES - A request ror the Ins flat on or a, e-M racy modular structure to serve as am .informatior center for Terra Vista situated on a 50 9 were parcW within the Commnity Commercial Distr4ct of "Cerra Vista located on the northeast: corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APM: 1077-421.q)5. Applicant has also filed a Tree Removal Permit. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan and building elevations and"issuarrce of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin : or - s. anne ommunit� South , Jndustrial Specific Plan, Subarea b , East - terra vista Planned Community Test - General Commercial C. General Plan Designations _ Protect Site - ommun y ommercial North Community Commercial South - industrial Park East - Community Commercial West - Commercial D. Site Characteristics: The site is presently used as vineyzrds and M significant land form are present. Signifitint vegetation includes Red Gum Eucalyptus Windrow along O.e Foothill Boulevard frontage: The naty�al 4?vund drains from north to south at approximately a 2% grLde. PLANUM COWISSIOR tTAFF REPORT CUP 86Rx4 — Lewis K: July 12, 1987 Page 2 i J ii. ANALYSIS: A. Generals The fnforrat•ion center wit, "be developed on the site' ra rijii1 ultimately be the Terra Vista own Center. This. entire project is temporary in nature and will be removed with the development of the shcppittg center. permanent street improvements will not be requi,rtd' along Havem Avenue or Foothill Boulevard at this ti"- However, the applicant is requesting to remove 6,1 Ree GM Eucalyptus trees along Foot-4111 Boulevard and 5 trces 6 haven Avenue -,,.at the time the infor -ati „n center 'is iasta led. The trees ; s be removed prior to ultimate development of 7'oothiji. Boulevaarv, the applicant would like to resaol the tre-as #o install interiv, fencing and landscaping along ootii',Foothill and (haven. B. Design Review Committee: 1,e Comaittee (Emerick, iitakesley, XrouttTT reviewed "iB"e pro ect -;zn July 2. 198? and re6i miended j approval of the project based on the following comments., 1 1. Provide additional stucco deailing on each end of the structure. 2. The proposed monument sign,,desfgn was acceptable to the Committee. Ibis sign will be r used at major entries to Serra Vista in various locations (i.e: was: Line at haven) R s well as its use in conjunction with iiie information center. 3. he Commit.ee agreed, that since the Eucalyptus Windrow would most likely be removed within the next 12 months for street widening of Foothill, the applicant's proposal for interim landscaping was acceptable. Landscaping (turf) will be provided to the maximum extent possible (as permitted by Cal Trans). C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee has rEviewed, Me pro4ec °any determined that with recommended conditions of approval the project is consistent with applicable standards and ordinances. All permanent street improvements and utility undergrounding may be deferred until the site is to be mare fully developed if such improvements are secured by a lien agreement. D. Environmental Assessments Upon review of Part 1 of the Initial Study and completion o mrf II of the Environmental Checklist staff has found that the onIN notable change to the environment will be the removal of •E')e 66 Red Gum Eucalyptus trees. Removal of the trees is ne,',Assary for ultimate tevelopment of N w cr _ �r e PLAN F" 8I AFF REPORT° #sues � �« 'l�•9 l Page 3, _. = k Foothill .Voulevord and Raven Avenue (see Tree Removal permit f, 8t- 7}, fro• oilier significant envfr 6menta7 impacts are rel;a�ted to the e•v0006ht of the infoyzation canter. III. FACnS and- R RIN9r1N� vkelo es project is: consistent with the G °:�eral- This pas nt Code and -. the Terra.' vt` to PUrined ° „Community. The project will not be diatri*entM to adjacent; properties or cause significant eytvirord -6-6 tta`i _ 'i Utsz . add.tion, tie proposed site ; )an and``b0Tdfn.g design, ogett er th recommended' condl� ons, are in dom},i jan� a ti+3ti�, the Development �i% and City Standar'ds.: IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has peon advertised in The- aiiy Ra.ort newspaper; "property posted, and notices sent to praper y owners j within 300 feet of the pegject site. - t, V. RECOMMENDP ION- 5taf{, reco*,onds approval of this site,;plan and ui n e eva-lions and issuance;caf a Neg'a`tive Declaration.. Respectfully submitted, *ul BB:DM:vc a Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Rap.= Exhibit "5" -Site Plan Exhibit "C" ` Building Elevations Y = Exhibit D Tree Removal Permit Exhibit "E" - Tree Removal Plan Exhibit "F" - Temporary Landscape Coacept -Exhibit "S" - Monument Sign Design .Resolution of Approval 1 Cl \' 1 0; CITY CF TtEM- 4c'xon RANCHOCUCAMONGA RAMM DFVb €ter _ . sr-Au.. t3 TT 1 Z,4 + 1ANS Chtw- rTM9!s yydj JtitqY�.. ��yr yam. g FOOTAi14 _ _ A04aAYFt2C ...�._ _ 'l *M F 51iKAL DeC3I0N CffY OF M. Tnu: PLA.IwI`tM l3iVBI =tMT ----O SCME: ,":... r. PIRII 7,7 r / - —WALLS, EXT. STUCCO — ROOFINO4 CONC. TILE l . — tASCU1:. G S& GUTfEN AM0 El 11 xylC rri " 'gyp' 1.^ -�.. r .�.. .... 'i,� •:1 •' '' � 1 .. NCTS: 3 OCCUR AS STREET ' FACING WVATION ON;.T FROND' t HEAR ELEVATIONS J ry II F LEFT BJGHT 112C ELE6/ATIAWS St.'s 1H• 11. crry cF NEM= _ ( RANCHO CLUANKXNUA TITLE= PLANNM G DWSM MMM _ x �" ra Z 0 V .LL 0 Z LLI it Pry City of Cucamonga Tree Removal Permit DEVELOPMENT GENERAL INFORMATION -OR MORE THANSTREE; is •i iNEARFEET{JFl+VINC Ordinance No. 275, pertaining to the preservation of trees rn pri ;,ate property, requires that no person remove or relocate any woody plants in excess of fiftoeri (15) feet in height and having a single trunk circumferenEe of fifteen (15) inches or more and multi- trunks having a circumference of thirty (30) inches or more (measured twenty-four (24) -inches from ground level), without first obtaining a Tree Removal Permit from the City. TO BE COMPLETED Bit, APPLICANT. Terra Vista Information Center and vicinity LOCATION OF SUBJECT SITE: North side Foothill Blvd. from Haven Ave, to Spruce Ave. NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF APPLICANT: _ Lewis Homes of California 1156 N. Mountain Avenue, P. 0. Box 670, Upland, CA 91785 (714) 985 -0971 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHOKE OF PROPERTY OWNER (if other than applicant): _ Lewis Development Co. and Western Properties, same address and phone REASONS FOR FEMOVAL(attach necessary Sheets): The trees will be removed to facilitate installation of interim landscaping to beautify the community. The trees lie within the ultimate paved area of Foothill Boulevard and therefore must be removed when the street is constructed. — — PROPOSEDMETHODOFREMOVAL Trees will be felled and the stumps pulled. LEWIS HOMES of CALIFORNIA APPLICANT'S SIGNA 3 -11 -87 ADDITIONAL FILING REQUIREMENTS This application shall Include a plot plan indicating location of all trees to be removed and retained. The species, number, and size of the trees tr Le removed shall be so designated. if a tree is diseased, then a written statement from a licensed arborist stating the nature of the disease shall be required. ACTION o FYAlultlon of this 41301cation is based on the eritor'v on the reverse aide. r— LC APPROVED ❑ DENIED By' Reasons: Date: Notification of application shall be given to property owners within a three hundred foot radius ten days prior to approval. If no appeals are received, then the permit shall become effective ten (10) days from the date of action. This approved tree removal permit is valid for9Ci days from the date of figat map rece dation or building permit issuance, whichever comes first. Should applicant fall to remove the zees itnin this 90 day period, a new permit shall be required, unless an extension Is requested fourten (14) i4yi prior to the explration of the permit. 1 u TFZM06 To, Se r- F- Heavep it1 Z U! L: su it �I wa a was.►•• aae♦► �►. iw •oa•rairi ►rr► ♦rarsas ♦.��yi�tiae Ritia ea ♦s ►a•ie. N I T`Y MAP C Fr✓ rEZ I Fz M�tAl..) NORTH CITY,icF ITEM RA 1� P[ All-NI I3Tsi i EST€'; . __ ' SCAM- � �// ' ^ ' ' '' o ' �` its+ f l RESOLUTION NO. C �s � A RESOLUT110X OF T'taE RA ,40 CUCAMONGA PLANNING 'COWISSION APPROVI€Ntl CONDITIONAL USE TERRA P ERMIT Nfl, 86 -14 FOR, ' VIISTA I11F A1'IONi-x._ TER LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAET CORNER OF FOOTHILL Bt?Ui EY/kRQ ,AHD RA WEN AVENUE IN THE CW.991TY COMERCIAL DISTRICT 8F TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY WHEREAS., on the 17th day of June, 1987, a ctgaplete application was filed by Lewis Homes for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hgari�ng to consider the above - described pr63ect. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resc�yed as follows: SECTION 1. That the following findings can be met:. ° 1. That the proposed ruse is in. accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is- . located. 2. That, the propased use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimentM to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the a(ol icable provisions of the Devrlopment Code. SECTION 2: That this project will --t create adverse impacts on the environmen an at a Regative;neclaration ,Issued on July 22, 1937. SECTION 3: Thrt Conditional UeJ Permit No. 86 -14 is approved subject to—M MTTowing conditions: Planning Division: 1. Provide stucco detailing at each end of the structure. 2. The drive aisle location shall meet the parking setback adjacent to-Wor Arterial which is 28' minimum from face of ultimate curb. \1 3. The information center will be removed at such time as the Terra Vista Town Center project begins development. i 4, Details of the 3' high screen fence shall be 'reviewed and. approved by the City Plan�,.� prior to issuance of building permits PLANNING COMMISSTION RESOLUTION W). CUP 86-14 - Lewis Homes July 22, 1981 Page 2 Engineering Division: 1, .The current drainage problem at the ,northeast corner of 'Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall be resolved to ,,;the satisfaction of the �Jty Engineer prior to occupancy. 2. The facilities shall be set back a sufficient distance to not interfere with future street improvements.. 3. A ien agreement shall be provided to cover the cost of reeving thpf8evelo(*nt Monument sign if a city special mon6,aent si, fi is regOred in the future. 4. The temporary driveway along Haven kvenue shall be a minimum of 600 feet from the curb return. S. The existing overhead utilities (comauinications ana', electrical, except for the 66 KY electrical) on '.-c <' project side of Haven Avenue shall be undergrounded �r the first pole south of Foothill Boulevard to the first'1 pole north of Town. Center Drive prior to public,- improvement acceptance or occupancy,, whicheler accOs first. Partial reimbursement of one- • half the differs 4ce between the undergrounding c't of., tt& utilities on the project side of the street minus those (telecommuni- cations) on the opposite side of Haven Avenue is feasible, from the presently urdevefoped properties, 6. The limits of street improvements for the project shall be as follows: a. haven Avenue from Foothill Bouleva'Ki to Town Center drive and b. Foothill Boulevard from Haven Avenue to Spruce Street, 7. The required street improvements and utility undo, grounding may be deferred until permanent dejvelopment of the site if secured by a lien agreement. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 3987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. WNW, Cnalffian ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Sicretary :r' v IP �` .. PLgNfW fir. Ltil'ITIN No� �CUp, 81-� y 27— I, Brad Buller. OeRaty. Segretary of• the piann3nq_ft Ission of, the Cii�! of Rancho Cuc6amgnga, do hereby certify that the f0M,g0ing Res0i piton was d6ly, and > regularly i'ntrodgced pas d, aped adopted by the Planning Comnissinn of the City of Rancho Cucapan a; at a ragui.ar meeting Of the Flanndng COMP95toh.hekld on the 220. day Of tr19, 1587, by thel fall i o►afinq vofe -to- t . ppp AYES: COIaMSSIONER'S: NOES: COMMLSSiONERSz , ASSENT: C�iISSIQNERS i �j L, ii iI j% amt �M r _ iz- ee "'i �uY�ayy li Yawy1w� �� Z�{�y �� y� o �`aa all i,5 d aa F w GC .1 u 1" Y LPN N y=i Y RA �,g _ °'atY�"3. "SYi��'�$ �& aU !q= Y1�N N M ^y Y xi+ sa �.►, wp ��R PN. N 14� aT� 3 8 v �. lit IL the~ k Sam .w. °uiatiFi$ #a A a a sw AS a i3.0 SL`s Y N �. • s ; `s.L�.rf�N1�CaK figa �µ '+'1 •�w.Lw � Mp �u pp 6 ° cauY N =$C r �{L, Jos 1! Ira ,tea $ ,�� •?-{y �,S tail;y °y ra qq � oVi aHi `d • H /7 � ,A I _ I' U. E 3 a M y k 21Yy S2,;: I 4 ttv aga µ L r � iF '. �,� 3 u� 92 To yLLL�. Mwe}Q gR LV��q�q ^'w, g O.,yM�M i.µ8' L w,.; ��C� L�atC • ��y Cii YI. w io,Nt M�ya � W w y k 21Yy S2,;: I 4 ttv i AM w i 2.- Y. • µ L r � iF '. �,� ^'w, g O.,yM�M i.µ8' L w,.; � p2''��¢j C , ♦., io,Nt yLa K ��eQy �Nw 6M' y •``�•� MMM111 M4!� x tt Y�YY �y y OEM =C g wal V Y w Iv pp _ wee• r W m Ica. M �ai • i w L � v yMi!♦ R O!.~g @� N» a ig Y N N p .a prg chi ^w7r »Zyms. XxIg i0 Apt ^�O LY liz; so 29— 44Y M+ �r/ yy Y +plyy Pit p G� ! 3^ L? A sy� iGL `•�y ` '_ �n`��«ry Zak 8 vu rl ��xc i Tz —Tl l��r Y� � � `� 6 d dt"v �y�3l �Y$Nq�� e't �ao�wr VVVa3�Fo�a=i -Y1 ®6P �j Y# °c" gg'"' 1` i�"F "r' a+ �+�.s Y � Q •'*• w >!drY'N Y.O U K�Lp `�7.L'+' '� 1Val -,y� '.. �w+vay M� +p'. 41 y;y +A Y. yyL ya►, L y Lw+sY a`n M.z al lul Q 4 .. p�` N ti� L ca d ^CmM �x. ^ "b �1 La RN QL Y04 '%i'yv�� • � �.V 6L q�f0 �N L �q, � Sy �70F�6tlM MY, �iI�V q A .CfIpC C. �$'�S� ogs�1..q�6�OMV iy mo 4i A m ^YOV ps, •.pp� ys My �pf �QI��{ �p iiYiii c U� tiP �L 'NAY MQ`y)MNAaV v VSO NT. N wM� V. .Y. Na !?'��ai,'1� a: •.q ^a" ,.C, ��R fin"` m °►' o` =` �aNWV✓LN� a ^ y zN. a R. 6 g C qs °I C tC 2'. CC gis ei`:. .psi('e �N� w 4gQSN�p�F ba ia$ 039oi.. A„ L� ci, CC� iY O. �A�bMN`LP LM Yl��d p. '� c4LL� O ^R.r,�gcc O�yl��Iy$Q CIV GG C 4C•. 1•p f +oiMM 4: M,C'!� ,^��6111{GN N � cLi o � RYaY �` rL st°r R M+r i{NM.13 X69.0 I °IbQ 76 %^OOb CN .rte YWi9�q C.R .n .g°� NC.G i1 $N9I °i ^N M•�.1 y °C �� Y"r,aL ' .R+Rrj �"` &E, .2g2a': L`L V iG�RO.•C.LNwlY G I� yy!� NyM� �L,�r,.LVUOCa�j� S ►� a cgF 7R11� �.. 14. •.rRi irZ t� Gl �i ar7M� .�.re.`�yII y��y 3.,�c.�yy ^vI�I.. Z. Mg-S. -c'Z .2 Ic =/N9 M�wi IN M�M ®wa 6R -qY la V�IiN W �vut' C yQ9 yTy S E C P f � e v YI. �ss8 v L R N« G qq Y)4.ft.�� 6 G1 OCaw91� 2 0., N6LY. A. mc ai. 4. Ng pT R 6� �R�� IL sis I ■� 8 M� q Rr SX Ra � N MR§ta9 4 Wd YN GNN TIL J. i� ��, � Py GN'QN YP y�•�. N6M.�a�� 3 ..� Kg v MN�`v v GC I�a F+iw'.�i`9•N L i ti N® 6 M� L' 7.T� y °. 3 y � 'LL �r � 3. tg�3 YaN09•tl � rdo ,a v9 „ y.-o s bu Ss• R Y q6 °oyff� w�y uC �Y11.V LN3pgpv �a° ° nm' � ^ze cL•la y ygTiY a >{ Zi--S IV i NIA a�`�4LY. AY y VQ R r 3 p2. "a--. +` r 1 `' a+'•` y A 99 T��`` �•}. CS R 3 ;Z a O {IJI P .O:�Ly C 4prgyq 4N1 "�2p.` �Z; �v` o34e a a v.Rh asslRaaJ.°. r ! t C J �� N-16 Iwo i cam'@6 YY' V=RI�C C.R.rO L Nr- R -TL L Y aL1' $ SZE a$> L9' w RYGr �LL� •. pLO L'R� L C L�rt. r 9 yGGy Y� W �vut' C yQ9 yTy S E C P f � e v YI. �ss8 v L R N« G qq Y)4.ft.�� 6 G1 OCaw91� 2 0., N6LY. A. mc ai. 4. Ng pT R 6� �R�� IL sis I ■� 8 M� q Rr SX Ra � N MR§ta9 4 Wd YN GNN TIL J. i� ��, � Py GN'QN YP y�•�. N6M.�a�� 3 ..� Kg v MN�`v v GC I�a F+iw'.�i`9•N L i ti N® 6 M� L' 7.T� y °. 3 y � 'LL �r � 3. tg�3 YaN09•tl � rdo ,a v9 „ y.-o s bu Ss• R Y q6 °oyff� w�y uC �Y11.V LN3pgpv �a° ° nm' � ^ze cL•la y ygTiY a >{ Zi--S IV i NIA a�`�4LY. AY y VQ R r 3 p2. "a--. +` r 1 `' a+'•` y A 99 T��`` �•}. CS R 3 ;Z a O {IJI P .O:�Ly C 4prgyq 4N1 "�2p.` �Z; �v` o34e a a v.Rh asslRaaJ.°. r ! t C J �� N-16 Iwo F7' .. f LI MTs ify3t ti.� qLY fl 4p "L�.S }�L I'w ", Y..,1s Ra�. CUCyC.I NL7 d Ii VCNr N•ti�0_J. V N LN Oct si IN. Zvi dl Lm gill yt �y ymPe �a� irast = Y n$a� it °4a«wy pi�«t1.`Y "rE�R n a nyfrMMt$ N � «r oLln� vN. «a � % �C .S m ' oa.$o -' � �a10r �L G� $' L ar u o+ Ayj N Y YC L « w V yza nN G D.. gMNN G. OWN. Y J? ^ Ct INY g.g: a rp --=eSSSxy ^p�C Oq �qG 4ig� 0 > 1S C 9 +VL A =w st.-J& e I A N r !! :0 A{Y� G7.0 .G be.r �mprprp yy VV L �tl 9 Q 7 M C MS M G 1 qC •L r q e - ^4 ;N,eV � N � Ltl ' YV+�¢•� �� 4cC T �u� V.�It 3s�� O •_ r ®4 q tei a+ _N +* 4 y 3a11�ee2 m v` MFt r �y$y ilia. v v� m ey +5 �+C1 M c � w'..8m ^Y � w «.y- stir p `. yLeS^ 4 diO.i m >rq �Lla .. +yQ «a'.L w$ M'�a .'�t� a ^ld r Al e �' �3i CmSR 1m L�qY N� YqM ANrtlY ep pt{ =Nr C ■O y`^ Yplpy��. �]{.°� -.�C _�r Y�c aYw• L WRe CGN r� «C �t 'Y�^.-s $e'N�ae .�fF `a . ' ppie r-e Cy/yyy K �ms° e \� „eV , . .. «vwpCL �tiuM e a ,� .sa ° . cC•e�wl1 g=e�C��' r1 "��w� 'p q��' . � � ' f �r� Yf � A. f G s'bY �m _ � NC4"`a �`T` � . �id.. s y 1a°. 1j J°Q0e�5 y w +~4 � �' bxNy?, y' s . N t�y}e I yLLp oc�O}i- Y 'n .v•s=q V i �c= 2 K '.%d A �,o v° Ly� w'N �`yy C '? e `o M$ M 'Y�4 1P rac a Q _ Y4 IAN ?f� L4MMMMMM Y ~O GAS ■p .r 'NIA �f1 0 aZ 1' F{ V to d d 1 oca .yYa Ya rd T$'" O N c m +moo YirNO is dl «YY L N CyC. r�6rYi OY Y �7Aiw � y L Y Y �PNzg v A�i« 6Y YYY YY�� LyyY La Lam” Lev ai «s i E ° 'yl^ yjyM O N «° Q 0ta yu.�OCtQy q�R T`w yy��rp `.MWO'� ♦♦ Y ppv6 L N N 13y� T C ^T q z Yn L L y u t S-2 �e Ov +. E3 - .2i `}8' .1 c A, v ti ee W C o C vs`�l'� Of W. °ye CI.r. Vile 4:15 PLC pCi V9 pL „$ 3t M S oca .yYa O yg L N O L +moo YirNO is dl «YY L N CyC. r�6rYi OY Y �7Aiw � y L Y Y �PNzg v A�i« 6Y YYY YY�� LyyY La Lam” Lev ai «s i E ° AWL `YYapQi o +�p cods e� +v eaSae� �. �%OY y0 p� VMS P71� ^'N 'p �■ DC b Y' ICCY L G r L� a No i TL RP Y +M p iO a Opy 9 � y Y OY 3' ++ yp� R + C M �• 6 L O C' 4 C+ �. aN �6 C N CN O C R Yy «� CL OYM M �Y vav° vNi�'� +O «yyj�> sa'S'1{ �CYSCLYO°i +� 400Rw L` Y b`N O. P Y C Y Oi N�+N�p B L MLY o O QOg ^'� N +NM� ~qN +il _ C � N�q � X06 L0 ■�pnlOG NN N ^y +@ �� p�f,� ` q i p yt& CQYw.`. Wes" QC ii « f� C C pO l' C itY Cggd,��. pv. �O.r +fig �aa�T2sJ ^wyl C C ++ZZr Nba .CG ~Y ~F" = y� 81p C! ~ iy YY A ;iV +pppyi M xf� i `. + {«.� L IC D�� j$, M> CaO ' YUyO Q9 4C t °� OO � L via L p V La `s 4 M C O pYN a M ✓� «Y ((LgJgJ Ell Y t�pJ C.$ -S L C��M �� V +L V� C°q N ►+�!i• y T7Y CN wl3 q0` Mme^ M6QY pC .0 A qI Y�Oyy 0. + �YH� XO XR G + LGLw *i LL'p�• Rif ayC ,CO O a� WNVVVVVV WYV 6 t0 = p' ('M MEW N� �� f I tLd��. a ice+ `� � � ;. tf�• 1 /",40 AS Ru 4: 3: _E - � *I a pg " % Is. - ..z zz Az! S b .5 Q Zi a k. R:i - j.5 t id 1. 4 mi $ a. Z. -gr a - -a.T- E Z sat ga gas -8 E , A . ;l "g a .14 g-5 Z, V- E Z;f Z. e W St NCC t 2 ma &I - ._VS gl� "t VIE 3. -,9.n ge 6- 'S..o Xb, c%° 'L "L ; E. J., L X 2-11 J". W_ 2- 29 a -.5 1 A v ZZZ r ru ax 21 21 =N -e z a V -5 W E S X 3rT Z" a. . . -,.a r -. � -C % -0. Z,,s 44 s 2 a, a CP v �s L IT W'.5 .2 Tz r, 18 23 v 9 g j.2 Q-Z .5-8 ;a E �GC 4i it 2 "Z Eli -a" IR CIE. 12 I Ut 0-9 z 15 a u LA I C. wpr Ch a . r.1 47 �.W o bi VE L3 a J 41 .0 m u,15 A;,9 Nile SAO 1. .5 z c zi Qw_ IZ a .2--s if gig E 32 is- .I - -4 1 �- . z? 'OT tz 2.1 44 ing 3 St!i liar, rf'Q L 41 is *To zi Aa =se . ts ax-C DATE: TO: FROM: 8Y SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT G3C'�MON ARO �9 s F � 2 j 1977 July 22, 1987 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY amen Serra s a Anne ommun y by establishing a Business Park Overlay Zone for areas designatied•as Office Park, Commercial, and Mixed U e, within the planned community boundary. L. ABSTRACT: The developer requests a recommendation of approval for T eisuance of a Negative Declaration and approva3 of the Community Plan Amendment to create a Business Park Overlay Zone. II. BACKGROUND: The developer originally proposed an amendment in Uc_to_Fe-rF-oT 986 to establish a Business Park Overlay Zone.. After several public hearings, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed amendment to establish a Business Park Overlay .Zone to allow industrial uses, was in conflict with the goal's and objectives of the General Plan, Terra Vista Community Plan and Industrial Specific Plan. The Planning Commission, on April 16, 1987, denied without prejudice this previous amendment to the Terra Vista Planned Community (Terra Vista Planned_Gommunity Amendment 86 -02). The developer appealed the decision of the Planning Commission, but later withdrew the appeal prior to consideration by the City Council, The applicant has now re- submittEd the amendment to establish a Business Park Overlay Zone which incorporates almost all of the previous rec(xmsendations from staff in eliminating industrial uses and limiting the intensive retail and service uses. The following section analyzes the types of uses being propo5,-,d within the Business Park Overlay Zone. III. ANAL�SIS: A. The Establishment of a Business Park Overlay-Zone The purpose of s verlay.:.one, acearQ ng o ble developer, is to provide for multi- tenant projects fostering small businesses. Small business users typically require a,comtination of office and limited storage area, with the offlcc-use expanding overtime, to ITEM 0 ;` r � RT- s equipment, office machine sales and service, messenger and postal service... o'.. rommercial recreation Facilities compatible with Ofice use, including, but not limited to healtt, :'r��:Tuba ar gyms (CUP), racquetball courts it-UP). t� w PL,fiI�t�ItiiG, Tit�SIdil� 5?Ah"F REPORT ' 'i1iPG AMEi+Ct 8� 0?� — Vl,ESi>rkN OEllEi.OP« Jtiiy, 22, 1987 Pale 2 ` > >��fi1T most of ti.L building zrea, in �:dditif� to the uses )�erm3tted by the Base Zone, tiie Overlay Zone would allow ether T�ttd uses that .range from administrative and professional uses,: rLz� #1 and st':rvice uses as .listed in- Exhibit.. "A ". Staf, Ga�raent� This proposed Alnrr,iti«'�ent woiaTd allow, subject ��,, a@t. I. , otiai Use Perini t, Rosiness Park Overlay Zane in areas designates[ for Office Park only_ In reviewing the 'list or the land uses proposed withip tite'pverlay Zones as shawp in Exhibit ` "R ". Staff det'erntine+� that' Wiese uses, which age from administrative and professid "�'.' uses to retail- and service . uses, are compatible within the Office Perk dear =�iopntent. They would not creme redundancy or i.�cbslance of_ „CotanerciaT: Office, Industrial, and Residential land uses a�3thin the planned cainrt+ranity boundary and Citywide boundary. �. Recorrnendaicion: Reprove tha,este+�lshment of th+r._8usiness Par's Overlay zene or areas designated as Office Park, south of Church Street. s S. Uses Permitted it Business park - overlay Zane: � 1. This section begins. with "Administrative Offices” and r, ends whit "Automotive Service Station (CUP ?" and as listed below. o Administrative Office a Professional' office, including, but net limited to such professions as accounting, law, incmie` tax, . insurance, architecture, engineering, medicine,- optometry, podiatry, r;niropractic, osteopathy, dentistry, real estate, escrow, financial brokerage, .securities brokerage, interior design. o Institutional. and Government Use o Retail and service businesses serving the needs of africe users, including, but not iimited to printers, stationers, secretarial servi�e s, office supplies and PLANKNO COMMISSION STAFF l<;PO� t } TVPC MENDRENT 87 -02 - iiSTER "DEVELOP. July 22, 1987 Page 3 o Banks and Other Financial Institutions o citing and drinking establishments. o Automobile Service Stations (CUP) Staff Coments: A review of these types of proposed uses indicate ai'ihey par_llel those uses allowable by the City's Development Code !,rthin the Office /Professional 011trict. Therefore, the prjpc�ied land uses as listed above are acceptabic_; The Commission may wish to consider allowing dance /martia'- arts studios to. Commerical /Recreation Facilities wader a Conditional Use Permit as these types) ,31' uses are also very similar in nature to health clubs and gyms. Recc®endation: Approve the above section of Land uses within e us Hess Park Overlay Zone and add Dance/Martial Arts Studios to Commerical /Recreation facilities under a Conditional Use Permit. 2. This section begins with "Retail studios, stores and associated workshops' and ends at "City Planner approval" as listed below: o Retail - Studios, stores, and associated workshops for the purpose of sales, office, showroom, and design with workshop for the custom -made samples of products for display only in the showroom for the following types of arts and crafts items: jewelry, pirture frames, quilts, ceramics, pottery, and specialty gift items. Custom made consumer golds within studios, stores and associated workshops may be allowed provided that the workshop area for custom made consumer goods are ancillary to the studios or stores and de not -exceed thq 35% of the leased floor area, and subject to City Planner approval. Staff Ca®ents: These types of land uses are similar in nature to ar s sf-udios" rhich would be a compatible land use within an office park development. By allowing office, showroom, sales, and design studio, types c" activities, it provides an opportunity for "one -man operation ", or an artist to set up a small business. The main objection to the previous proposed amendment was the introduction of custom manufacturing uses, which are inconsistent with the intent of the Terra Vista Planned Community, the goals of the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan. Staff recognizes that these types of design studios do need some space 'For custom made samples of product or incideki l custom -made the limited order of PLANNING COMISSIGH STAFF REPORT E~ TVPG AMENDMENT 87 -02 WESTERN DEVELOP. July 22. 1487, -page 4 , .. products` It is also recor ized that it would be impossible to distinguish the custom made samples or the limited order of a t custom -made product from a customer. BY limiting the leased floor area for custom made samples and/W consumer goods to 20", rather than 30% as proposed, it becomes an incident6) or ancillary uses to the main function of the business, which�is the office, sales` a »d showroom. Recamendation. Approve the above:, section of land uses with Vie mod1fica on that the maximum percentage of leased floor area for custom-made consumer samples or goods be limited to 20% subject to City Planner approval, ;f j r ` S. this section started with " rtail and service businesses serving the needs of residentiaE) uses% and ends at "ticket- sales, etc." as fellows: a Retail and services businesses serving the needs of $' the residential uses, including but not limited to the following and the of the showroom, catering establishments, contractors (excluding contractor's yaPds), ,'building supply stores, fabric stores, shoe repair shops, antique dealers, security device sales and service, telephone sales, „luggage sales, pet grooming and supplies, opticians, medical supply -1 sales and rentals, electrical, electronic, "processing, date and telecommunicatiors sales and service, auQio /video sales and service, furniture sales, apparel shops and similar businesses. Convenience retail and service businesses such as food and beverage, newstands, bookstores, barber and beauty shops, cleaners, travel bureaus, photo developing, tuxedo rent, '.. bicycle sales and repair, locksmith, ticket sales, etc. Staff Ca®erits: These types of commercial uses would be L j compatible wiiF►in an Office /Park development. There would still maintain a degree of distinction and balance between comtmercial, office and mix use type districts within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Rec tion: Approve the above section of the land uses t a the I u mess Park Overlay Zone. 4. This section ;'starts from "CommhAity Facilities as Specified Above" and ends at "Parking Requirements.... approved by the Planning Commission" as follows: D-4 PIA. I f DOS I01 �Sy�FF:REP01�1 ' TvPfn AFtNDMEt�t iVE$iLiRN'DEYELOP, J:uly'22, r Page '5 _ o aComaw uiti °es -Facilities cs Specified Above o' Itcc Con j- d uses necessary or I cils acr%1y incident a3 � the above uses. ti o qth r s+es Pich ar, �U 'd by the PlAWngCommission t-t bo con" tint witfi the, spirit and tn�,ent of this i 1a�n ,. "use cTas�iFjcatt #on. -4. u Park hgr requirements for business, parr shall be'`�ne° shme is for OfficetPark, unless otherwise approve 1J W P anning wnwission. Staff q2W_ ts: The abbe-. land use °language is acceptable. RecsmeENatian• Approve the above section of ,the land uses h n f" usi'ne4s Par`) Overlay .tone. U Iv. ENYIROMMT& ASSESSMENT )it a result of the initial Study, staff as a erm ne a e proposed Amendment Mould not create potential significant adverse. impacts, in that, he proposed Amendment does not alter the present planned land use�Wf the Terra Vista Planned Coaimunity and the general Plan; and that ft W0,14 not conflict with the objectives and pbliciEs of the jeneral L and the Industrial Specific plan. If the Commission ;de staff findings, a Negative Declaration could be prepared and recornded to the City Council. V. FACTS M.- TINDINGS. In considering the proposed Amen&.ent to the Terra s a tinned Community, the.,Planning Commission must make the folling findings:. 1. The Amendment does not conflict with the land use policies of the Gen2.aj,Plan, and Z. The Amendment does promote` 'tUhe - growth of the land use element, and 3. The Amendment 7would not be materially injurlous or detrimental to adjacent properties. VI. CORRESPONDENCE; This item has. been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a public,hearing and the property posted. J. I P1 AlStt6 'COt�Fi.2SSZON STAB:= REPORT E� Adi N[ �1fRt 8 -02 � V:1$,TERN AEYELO! ", . July 221, 19a page b j YI2. RECOMMENDATION: Staff �46m*itds'that the Planning Commission conduct a public nearing to review the proposed Amendment and to receive public input. If the Commission concurs with the findings, then adoption of the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council would be in order. Respe u%,' su' tted, ,t' j ra u r (Oily Pl nner 08 :NF:ktS Attachment.: Applicant's Lette►, of Request Exhibit "A" - proposed Text from Lewis Homes for the ftJness Park Overlay Zone Exhibit "a1° - Proposed Designated Areas for Overlay zone' Revolution Recommending Approval to City Council 1 ;f +l Y dt.� mMi 7E 4711 VWXd. 7 ¢ June 15, 148'/ � or Planning�zrision =.} y City of ,Rancho Cucamonga „s 9324- C,Base Line Road Ranch6' Cucamonga, CA 41734 .<: ATE SONz Dan Cdteman ' Senior Planner SGBJECTc `PERRA41STA PLANNED COMMMXglY A MMMENT NO. 3 Dear Dan: ! Encloses; are three copies os iris revised text for Amendment No. to the Terra. Vista Community Plan, dealing Vith the Ausiness Park overlay Zone, along with the Uniform Applieatiou and fees, As you know, the purpose of this Amsendment is to provide fY?r a varimty of , small business uses in Terra Vista subject to approval of'a coda],,ional use permit. These uses are typica:ly small but growing firms who initially' require,a combination of office and storage area, but whose office functions eventuazly grow to fill the entire space. The enclosed revised text into 1\' rporates all of the changes rccommlen��ed by the previous staff repo-v,:, and also inrIzpar s a percentage Iimd t an storage -type area as recommended by Brat \Buller to us subsequent to" hs 4 Planning Commission hearing. For your convenience. a red-1 Ine of the laAt ve lesion of a amejF*`nt ;text Is also enclosed. We .'ill appreciate an early;! -ing on this' }a` and, we hope, final version. _ Cordially. s,EW HOMES OF CALIFORNIA a -j (2ha R. Mel her President /Project Deve-lopmemt J'RH. km h, 1 fa6 N Moul, ;n @ Pp Box 5r ��. Upfana, trkai i$5 1 714) 985.0971 Devexooed by LOW'S 2 r � L -� OH PIK CYO M en � � .0 Q a v n U co t c G 0 u 0 r ti mttn tn Q Q 3{ W c 3U a V fr i I Ln m i` n U., w i1 A 2 i L to N p CL th a++ CA O "` y m,GR05 ± N m 3 >n. N IA a+ N N w G C.. Y N C O y? y� r. to C in y ,.O C N C C tD O H U Rf •U ".` O w _ W CAtO O a+ M C p O 0 .ti ,C L �: B si L. i`. CTJ N Q O .in 4L3. L. 0 u^ w I C yA ft S. O � .� Lt2naj � O U j m uul 0- in R; G Nmu L L Z. Nit} N a L N C Cq is sy U .+ O 'a N 4 L �tD00��C'C� "ya O �;a47dUd vN y0 ro ID tGAi S�.N+ O. O aG`1ra OQ.vom=L' r „ d atOiuUU iG ,v>_ ;i «a3wk a. rnv)Or� ant oOiN w a ° _ot� y „ N > .0 y" .� L. G m C ,o U r N iv Q!" IV in o aE u 7.cr (fit n- m OZ C L : 0. WA , ° as � , tA Dt V � ai w ttS G y r= 4t C l� C i3 UN t2 A 0. t" .+, wU C avim` pO�AOmG n Mme 4« ` O Z7�+p Ox m �d Ca m N 7 M� 0. NNQb 4� qtO L to L�+EL OS in CL Q.0 40. G t0 ` C tZ m 0_ M N U t�.�C a. u5 0 t4 C "' 8t y t0 z W A' zt >4EMZ � p C � CJt� N �u 4) a�iNC3M+4 JC A� "per L ti emu_' m Xtu- G rIm A U " .G.' .w d( U NC! O Lw O 4t•-'. O d Ut 0 M E> .�+ Nb C1 acsc 4.c d _ CA at tL„ >t, Q Cr L p to �,'HL -0NQ *+n% r. � a M Qi St CG- + � +' �. p C! > ,i+ y C71 G X mEi..�' . GOO. a- CL.� • R ,i"' N i31 £v-.. G O ++ O E CwU. O 04. L �N ++UULO Ot ro v oo) C= N C a^ trt m" C C O 4J G 'fl ""' vS O N L O r ao; Q a t C U w3 •N G77 Cyi' "... •.•-G O G ct> N�ttu�yUtna 4Y C sc t6 d G O H '(j, ^ 0. n L E 6? d CZ Q u 'Q ..! 4 Lu T- w LO N•CL,>B,EXL�mA A "J CL.Q .+ O O iG A 2 i cc 01 41� k ac a l Qj ,.Y N �+ L ��0 CyN �v N fn'RU ro w N � ° �C) - O 3Na to N J > ci C ° ucF; °= QLn ` Or ct O t L Ca N C) . p L �••- v m-o t0 7 S3 Cr C t0 L an 'D q, G .:+ ? O -p > E N. G X = A. Y �Mo to *. "La r_�L'in Zm3E �.N L S. Qe .. +^ 67 S N U N t@ '� L_ tV N N. y N L °E3O•v- CC+^ VX Via. • °N �3� x R L .G 6F v C d..0.L IIS a.+. W-. `a a+ C N �O C'GLO V� �.+° O p,aCQy�N -0 tO CYQ°L sm iocUt° ,y °cC1',� a �� to ri d o cr Q Ct y C L C vy aNr N V aria A ami'°' p_ tn r1 O N +''p0 C m w a Q O A L t6 V L LO_r t0 y L A d j tn to .'...0 O N f0 U �'tp N N .•� a `l •.7 N °'O -O O C ` v car ° @ E tr- aLr ° a t7.. 'a V m°.. C °'' L •O L N. to 3= •O L V th N U 9. i N �.L? ° ° °wEm&, C'C+ °V .ar°O)mwa 0 t3tf°c- �- ca• w nUUl'a° a]3 U ..6 Qcrd m t0 jtcCm N 0 L_ rn 8 . ,.. w e r «.., toy g°i.C�Lt'^ �C o - �N� —aar ? —�oL. d" In Fi ° ! y N CL Cr N � u �� :lS � N a t ` O Tt CI 10 O ' « t , . N " N N L N r > tY W -C L Ci to d tp IQ N' di tC~0. L ... v�E+.+ 0 0 r °^ N aTJ, O E N O N a.r. C U �� N•U OD a _ z U Cr 7 L •+ C C1 N N C an �, tL pO 0 a a tp wM Oi��S1Ot9 L- `� a+ R O 'A -C m. C !? U .3 s' .N Wr O N I C O N A d rr N �., _ •— ° V L yr N y : v C, ++ uj C)+� O M.L O CL 6r d�''"L =fig' NCO & C 019 •�Lt4 Ct2 V N °= °•3 t; +'K,L'°�t3LL D d?; .. 1j ^a t�'d•Cr+�,''„6i O'C O L Cr V4�'CSw 14 tC L1SLttv0 -4 U tNA4)rL+ 41 0 MC= ul � mall, Y Y 'xE) cl m � Y �m f on JS it uj r ' r t y mom CL lK yam, �; _ j, .� M .rt momAt r jig Ct� ?° syil� � Id CJ 'xE) cl m � Y �m f on JS it uj r ' r t y mom CL lK yam, �; _ j, .� M .rt momAt r y � . E50LLITION NO. wy fl, * TE{E "PLA KI'N0 COMP9 +Yt OA i3 ;8E q,�TY OF` 1 IRRt -IFQ l�T/t, E�RCOk2�031ine Ap , an , WE. TER 4 }i Ohl ITY MENl N.-,' N 8tT :02, %err B ig �L RE T% `8r` f 5CA8LIS��6 �, 1 R ►�2�t1E F{i AR£�,5 DESfl�11E spy �FF�I:E K-7 RISIPiC .tlTf�b'TffE PLANNED CQt7NIl1!.8tilialOR.. € t %'IiER ihe• p?TAMI fng C.oemiss160 'has beld #1 adve -if ped �uhtic hearing to cggider Qq� �. commen�S on �t�e. pw�± -sed Terra- Visa Tanned ,0 Amendment 8T ;02 P o�nfitiy WTI ON I The Rancho Lu ��bnaa Planlin� C,� isston hereby makes the follow ng a , ngs� � , n A. The AfthdMent does nod onfilict -with the Land. Use r pOI_1 C4 , of the.8eneral pt an. h ? D. The l rtendaocaat proaotes goals of the Land,11ce Eleiai nt. C. The Aaiun &rent wou'- nov''tre n�tei fly injuriaus detr iaentil to the a�,ld "nt peopor`iI5- i SECTION 2 Tile' Rancho: Cuca a� a pl j\ Cowaifssfion h -13 found 'that this pro' ec : ev noV errite a: s- %gniftcant aaerse }, ire��ct on thx ,environment and r tuaends issuance of a :legatio -, Declara Ton, &,, 22, 191, NON, THEREFORE, 5E IT R& lVEDs t 1. That `pursuant � Sertipn 55d50. 'to 65855; of the CalifOrnia Government Code,- that the ;Punning z: � ` ° Cads;ion of t o City of Rancho Cucamoneit hereby recommends approval of .,tern Vista Planna,'Zomrity Amendment Na. 87 -Q2. The banning COMiSSion recwmnds that the � City Courcil reprove and adopt Tersa Vista Piarned Couni+ . r`t ndmient 87-02 to modify tie Community Plan as attached. r 2.a. =. _...rs - �. •d s - .,... #yw.at i�„,�,,�- .•m.a�3 .4, _.._,.. ... __.r ._ > _ ..tvS:Y.^,�'k,&.._, �1 x� �srER�p�a, TII=S JU y 22, 198, E, Pa.T APPROVBD APit3 N7Qp7ED 7F{ISr 22?i Qty OF JOEn98T. �.' _,PLANNING 6t *ISSLON 0FI M4 'GTTY OF ;_Ymd."o cucI MQNGA IN arry T7 Mql, a xan . ATTEST; Brad ur izrj. ep# y, e, ;re j.ry �t Iy Brad Butler!, Deputy Sedrotary of the Pinning .CbmpissioEt of the City of Rancho CucamonPa, do hereby.c�tif�r that the fgreg6inq kesolution Was duly and regularly intraduced, passel, and' idbpt=_d by`Ithe [Banning' Cominiss�irh of tho City of t?uncha Luca +3ngar., at a regular meeting of the PJajn sing C is Corr held on the 22nd day of Jule y, 1987, by the M 1-14 14 votd =to -wit: C r l 1i ANES: CC1MMItM., NEBS: CO ISSIONERS: ABSENT: , -i' C SSICNg R-',, l� f r k " M 9 �^ .. r - _ S CITY 01 RAPiCT �� CUCAMONGA 1 STAFF RIEV , T 0 BATE: July, 22, 1487 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Plan'irg Commission FROM: tl Brad Buller, .City Planner 1� BY: Sc; )tt Murphy-, Associate ,-,Planner SUB3ECT: MODIFICATION AND TIME EXTEHS10M O:•,R 66YELOPMENI REYIEw 85- e eve ohmeraA . o apar n um s on of .land in the ;Medium -High Residential District 14-24 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Arrow Route, west of Haven Avenue APR: x'08-341 -16 and 17. I. BACKGROUND: On Aug,.z 28, 1385, the Planning Co "fission reviewed an approved Development Review 85 =06. The project consisted of 624_, apartment units to be developed in two phases. The initial phase,. consisting of 376 units, has been constructed and is currently occupied. No building permits,have ,Yet to be issued for Phase II, consistir,J of 248 units. II. ANALYSIS: A. Time Extension: The project was originally approved on August. 2$, 1985 l or a two -year period, The applicant requests a time extension to allow Phase II to be completed. ° The maximum Period of approval is five years; therefore th,,- Commissio may on grant up to a three year extension in_ �eive,- 'mont6 increments. The project conforms to the Development Code. B. Modificatlun Phase II; Js proposed to be modified to take a *.an age o " the reciprbcal access to the west as a major entree. The applicant is proposing to provide a recreation building and swimming pool area as a focal point at the southwest corner of the site. The residential building originally proposed for this location will be relocated -2o the northern portion of the site. As a result, slightly less open space will be provided at the 'northern portion of site; however, the overall open space area and number of units will remain unchanged. C. Design Review Conraittee• The Commiti --Ze Umerick. Tolstoy, Bulled reviewed the proposal and reconsmended approval subject i to the following conditions ITE!i P 3R M1 1;41fr 7- MMMMM \age 4 b 3 3. The poor area and r4cr*UPn building locations should be'. swi tc4e4, 2. A solid decorative block wall should :be provided along the r' I�' sWh side of the pool area t� prom -le privaoy for too pool s F At the Design ;Rsviqjr *etii�zg,3 the staff ex ess�d copcern aboutt:,� = the design of they. s harwf , drivewaY located 'At the so West l� Jcorner•.,h�f the site. st "felt that the accesa"needed further` review and MI)t t. Upon .further examfnation, �jtaaff found ; r at 3 reciprocal- access agreement did no oxist, between this site and the adj �:ent prop to ,fhe West for the dr Y��ay onto Arrow Route, Discussions with the applicant duvtfiq the review process seemed to indicate that uo acsest onto. - -Arrow Route was necessacy to serve this .pro$e6t. " As , a rpselt, no ii rec, pro yal access aare nt'-was r egdrea milt the Project to the weft and„ in fart, has 4eea walled offs Yhereftare,, if the aAAI icdtat desiroA to provider accatt. ogtq. Arrow : Route through 3 the__* a of the shared driveway, a. r prccal acce5$ agreement ;' the adjacent proper owner mast be obfatined by , *he j! SApiica "t, # the applicant is able to obtain the ;ieeessary 1gre nt, the<driveway should be designed as shown in Exhibit / ti N , By dof�g `to, the dr*i+ii ray of this site will tie in with tile existing driveway for tine adjacent property... /' Tt cis uSS Ws sittation with ` the applicant, he has indicated ,;tt if the agreement caarnot be obtained, the site Will be;;de;Aoped io arcordancc Wth the original ;approval (August 28, 1985) for the site, III. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in he deity Report newspaper en all property owners within 300 Tee nave beep notified of the requ st, Ill. RCOMENDATTON: Staff recommends that the plamning Co mission approve Me modifications ,and grant a one year time iitension for Develo;meny Review $5-06 through ad0p,eion of the attached .Resolutions with conditions. 1 I cl3 ` 1 •�H PL 100 8 tS STAFF REPORT Ok Resp u? "iy 'c+llbn+it :: j,', I rar City Pj nner _. .n F , Attach mts: Leer from Aopiican Exhibit "A" Appmed Master Pian:; °{ z Exhibit "B" d Original Sifie P" ' Exhibit "G - Reu3se� Sii��, Pt 1 Exhibit "0",,- Sh�ar•,ed Ar9t�,way Aesig€r Resolutm iif Apj,�oval vn Conditions for Aodification Resolution of Approval with ConditioM, for. Tim R_ t li n 1; v ctrY op'Ck$toflGA oft7tstt74 June 22i 1987 -' Juts = 3 1x37 0 Mr, Scott Murphy City of Rancho Cucamonga 9230 Baseline Road Post Office Box 91738 RE; Time Extension Request Of"i -06 ;Alta Park Apartments Dear Mr.. Murphy: w As you are aware, Lincoln Property Company is requesting a nde year extension of our approvals for the above referenced apartment project =, We would agprecia*z i,i, Manning Ccxm�nission Hearing on this request W,* the earnest• possibia data~." The Al Park Apartments were approved by Rancho Cucamonga Is Planning r Commissfk�t on August 28, 1985. Our approval, OR 85 -061, permitted the devolopmiiist of 624 apartments on two adjoining parcels. The 376 unit �irst phase of tiis project is completed and is approximately C`O% leased, We are requilsting a'one year extension of this approval,,-and in order tn- permit the E projjlct°'s 248 unit second phase to begin construction later t;rls yr:ar> This Additianai zith4 will permit LPC to cpmplete revisions to its pl?!ns to accomoda`ie a recently submitted zitd plan revision as well as 'ior changes I ' requir¢d by California's new standards for the haifdldapped. g PIease do not hesitate to call me i4` you,hae any questions regardinct -th4s Time Extension Request. j 5i ely, Paul Den Assistant Vir-3 President PD: l kw P n t tSlt l f1C�� cowsw r3a r ;vtare t,eg aauLeVAFFMB UTO *M WESTL XIC VtL tCM CALWOW4 A 9 ��ec0.s • �x� t tai `�� `_ J: l• ;� E� ,�� z CITY OF r�.+[1V ��r' ill CA :7 ClT or* 'J R TC cui:� -� Q - � nlm W.., +a '�l r *iN.KT {�.'f. fir Ry Y'i 'yp"'. x.. .- .`y'�:"F w-- �?;a'^yT�: R'" fi ^f., --$° •'q 171 PLANtiII..� iA llaSiO t R@SOL TI.ON NO. DR 8Et' 06 ' neot July 22,�� - Page x 3. All ' pertizents Condit ;cons; of approval for ttie original V Devel+opownt - Revi,� 85 -Ob, as contained, in Resolution 85 -Y20,, ,N shall apply, = e , Eli neeri'r�g ,�i vi stops, _ An in -1 iec fee >as contrfibuign to the future urrdergou€tding of the exisfiing ' overhead `utilities Q'telecoaWnicat`toAs and V electr�ca`l) t -a t;ppO&M Sid* of Arrow route a ;', l be pa3et to s the C by. apr %av tq the isisnai4t of building peiitts. Tka fee M ,shall be , hal�_ the City adopted unit amunt tiaras the length of the pr03,eot: 11°6ntaga. s 2. If the necessary recipz,�al access agreeare , is obtained, the shared driveway shalt be, designed per Exhibit "C" of the st 'Aff report subjeka to reviir .,,and approval by tkL„,,Ci Engineer. f C APPROVED AND ADOPTED ViIS-22W DAY OF, JULY, 148* w e�,IKl�NING COWISSION.,OF l7kCITY OF RANCHO CItC RGA : BY: �--. L'ttri� r. HEM al r^ean ,. ATTEST: e -9—FaTTIV14, Uep— ufj►�f- reUR/ I, Brad Buller,, Deputy Secretary of the Planning`Comission of the City of Ranch Cucamonga, do t,, -reby certify that the foregoing_fesolution was duly and regvlczrly introdudeO, isstd, and adopted, by the Planning Colmission 'of the f f1ty ixf :Rancho -at a regular meeting of th£ Pla"if -ng Commission held -_ oil the 22nd day, of Pik j, 1987, by the fol;'owing vote-to-wit: AYES: C0r ^1 '1',SIWMS' NOES: COH SIONERS: _ r, ABSENT: CDWtSSIOH y P r % AimaALI I Mill M us WOE R �;_ Ol 02 w�ggem c:; ',"' W -•mss Y.. zr p ; .--f -� .Re- of �a yv� +t i, x' Y RSSOLUTIOU hf0. J { A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO ClltMoN A PLAN41NG COWISSION1- APPROWNG THE TIME kXTEM',l�i FOR DE3tEI.?.*EgT gffiEW WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for tha above- descriaed protect, pursupip to Section 17.02.090. 107 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above- described�DevL#lopment Review 8$-06. SECTION 1« The Rancho Cwcamonga P1 ,3nning Commission has wade the following` Traings: A. That prevailii�4 economic conditions have cpused a ' distressed market climate for deveTaopment ',of Ue project. r B. That current economic, marketing.. and inventory ` conditions: sake it unreasonable to develop tie project at this time. C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval'" f regarding ekpirations mould not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. 0. That the granting of said � cra extension wMt not be detrimental to the public hg�, ; i Pt PLAKK iOr�, � 1T'QN NO., ' 4u W age` IFPpYEOiNprJpO 'LE�til` ?2Np,,B14'lfIUE:Y s 3987. PCANNIN6 COFIISSTON pF Tff ` ICY LFNO' ClJC3AFipNGX 1iY:' Larry T. �e, ' ";7t i ATTEST: � `B`ra�i' u er, upy"'!l re vary �N f I. Brad Buller, pepu� •Secretary of the plfnning GOWsslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, o fiere y ertify thalt the foregoing Resolution was duly, and re,ularly fgltroduced, passed; .,and adopted by the PlannY�9 C fission of the -city of Rancho Cucamonga# at a. regular meeting of the Planning Commission held ' on the 22nd day of dully;. 1587, by the fo1'ToWing vote a -wi t: F AYES: Ct'jMMSIONERS: NOES: OM'iISSIpNF�.RS: A8 EF:1': COWISSIOERS: l a rt � lip ! , i ' z7- k. r Ask DATE: July 22, 087 T0: Chainian And Members of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TRACT 13542 DESIGN REVIEW - GRIGSBY - Design Review of bul I Wnla el eva ons an p-ot—p ans for Phase 1 of a Previously approved tract snaps consisting, of 96 single j family lots in the Low Density Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre; located between 4ilson Avenue and Banyan Street, east !if Chaffey College - APN 281 -191- 17 and a portion of 2 01- 191 -11. I. PROJECT AND SITE- D €SCRIPTIO A. Action Requested: Apr -3val of building elevations and -'plot plans: r _ Y I B. Protect Density: 3.09 dw6 ling uliits per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin : North !n9l-e'Fam1ty es ti aenti a1 and Vacant, Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant, Loki - Medium Density Residential District (4- dwelling units per acre) East - Deer Creek Channel, Flood Control West - Chaffey College.' Low- Medium Density Residential District (4 -8 dr -Iling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: ProJec • Site - Low Densi y Residential District '(2-4" dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) South •- Low - Medium Density Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Flood Control West - Chaffey College PLANNING COMMISSIM STAFF REPORT } TT 135,42 DESIGN REVIEW - GRIGSBY July 22, 1987 Page. 2 4 E. Site-Ch ar acl')Ilri, cs The site is currently vacant with a s opT ee of a p x m4 e 8 'south. y percent front north to The site is bounded by the Wilson Avenue Extension to the 'north, Deer Creek Channel to the east, the Banyan Street extension to the a. south, and the Chaffey College Stadium, baseball fiend, and parking lots to ,the west. II. ANALYSIS; A. Back rount: On March 25, 1987, the Planning "Goom;ssion rev ewe recommended i, and approval of a General Plan AP ent k, and a Deteiopment District Amendment to change the designatilps on this site from Low - Medium, Density Residential (4-8 dwel31hg cnits per acre) to Lcw Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). Its conjunction with the General Plan and ' Bevel opment District; Amendments, the applicant submi ted Tentative T race 13542. The tract consisted of 206 single family lots ranging in size from 8,754 square feet to,19,547 >. squga feet in area with an average lot size of 10,923. The P1anr'Ag Commission, in relating lNe tract -map with the proposed amendments; felt that thej) proposal would create a smooth transition between the Very Loi „Density to the north and t Low - Medium density to the south. As 'j result, the Commission,, Tract upon the Council approving�thea General Plan and DevelojAent District tme The City Council subsequently approved the amendments. The new land use and zoning designations and approval of the tentative tract became effective April 15, 1987. B. General: The applicant is now requesting .approval of the u ng elevations and plot plans ft -,Phase ,Phase I consisting of 96 single family res•idenc-,;at the horthPrn portion of the tract. the units propose`- for the site are basically the same units 44nstructed in the ''Compass Rose” project with.. modifications to minimize grading (i.e. raised wood floors, stem walls, etc.). The unit mix consists of 2 twa story and 2 one -story flapr, plans. Each floor plan has three elzvation treatments. C. Design Review Cosm:nittee: The Design Review Committee a es ey, erIc , Krouffl ) reviewed the proposal on July 2, 1987 (�?�?. Committee stated the project was acceptable with the exceptitn ' of provision for detailing around windows. The Committee stated that it is the polir..y off, the City to require wood trim or stucco plant -ons around all windows. The applicant felt that sufficient relief has been Provided on all g 4 ��RP N QF (IS P RBPO T ' 7T 1384 t]E� WX I d 'faRtGSBY JOY 2 z rl Page .3 ,' �fevataons wfth the various pop -out and recessed elements 'The ' applicant slat d3 h ' cfe it ng around WOdows will be ,proYis d bn s�ide•ele3at[dns o Co. 'or ]rOts.. Ohre e$s R rew p amfittee recomaepcCzd tiiatts its be fiorr�aed to the "Planning Commi sioon or ns�i, ek ti n` of thiis 0,01 y issue. IIY. �2ECGMEtiOATIQ Staff' recommends, that the 3�]anning Cord icon approve a gn revtew''4of buflding el'evatfons and plot plans for Tentative it rah 13542 thra adopton. of the atia6hed Resolt#i~fon of'Approval' th, Conditions whi'c� tai]ing.;around e all windows. Respe lly $u ted^ I' rad Bull; r City Planner BB :SM:te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Util zation ap Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C° - Building Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditions t , i; EF wm- • �� `'•• y to . void aat N � A � Y 3 a ? y V FL.a I[LNG DIVISM F- KHtr3rr. w-* I' ilk iti crry or. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tnu, aVWiCN Ext4imr. t _ � CITY OF. n �A r� y � :��5:.�. 3.< i ** i CIw RANCHO � . �, Y ' , ,.. tad y� ` ` '�"•':' �/ �� ::'� �"">`{ � 11 c' k ; __ r�coNT �L�VA` TIC 4 CITY OF- m. V C' nzm, RA71N CUCAiNlql,\r Tmr o Igo 11/ rF�.. �� i tt f � Igo �� tt f � 4 ■ i (, t �� 'i r�r li ? j ear II 1G ,F a law. I fir, to CUCA.ML ONG�k TntE,- YOKO, F. Amok PO A !e f / Olt E CITE' Oi PLA P 4 4 F. Amok PO A !e f / Olt E CITE' Oi PLA CITY ot. ,r RANCffo C LZ&M w- W17"11 7 7 -:t�. il, ME �RESOLUTIOi M NO. A :RESOLUTiON OF m RANcHo cuumoNGA m*,NIW� COMMISSILON AMOVING Dk&GN� i(EVIEW FOR TRACT��V.' 13542 L67CATtD BM&N WILSON, AVEiR AD BANYAN. STREET, EAST OF CKAFFEY COLLEOE IR THE LN DENSI*fOY RES-1DEhTM DISTRICT APN: 11201-i9li-17 ANR,,A PCQ,.7�,09:�OF 201-191-11 WHEREAS, on,,the 15th �V- of-, June, 1967, a complete application was nt fo e by Gribsby neveiopme rl, view of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd diky of July, 1987, tht RanLho Cucamonga Planning Coiagissloo held a weting to consider tk,,,_ e-� ed project. 4bov descrAb NOW, TAREFORE, ft;e Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as fillows: SECTION 1: ThWithe folloying can be raet: 11, That' the proposed project is cons-sten't with the objectives'of the General Plan.- and 2. That the proposed use is in accord wi th the objective of VT., Development Code and the purposes of the district In which the site is located; and 3. That the-proposed cse is in compliance with each of the 6�,qlicable provisions of the Development Code;_ and 7," 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not �s detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tract 13542 is approved subject to the fuTT80—n9conditions and attachisd Standard Conditiths- Planning �ifvision: 1. All pertinent conditions of ResoliAtion 87-37 shall apply. 2. Wood trim or plant-ons with stucco over shall be provi ded around -all windows. PLANNIOT COMIMM-1 imo. Tr )MY 2210 '�K page-2 APPROVED, Akb, ADOPTED THIS 29,ND DAY OF JULY. 1987. "0 NCH PLANNING COWISSIdi' F THE CITY OF RA .0 CUCAMONGA By: el Ch -an Larry T. McNi a1W b ATTEV: Brad M 1 er.- Deputy"500retAr'y I, Brad Buller,.,04puty Secretary of the Planning Coamissi-on,of- the City of 'uti Rancho Cucatoo,"a, do hereby fy �,hat the foregoing, Aes I on wa -s duly and lrlit',' and adopted by the -Plap regularly intebOuced.,;pAss Oing toupissfon of the City of Rancho,- Cuc=nqa,,-,4t a re§ulal- meeting of the PI,,anning Commission held on the 22nd.lday of �Jvy' '987', by the following vote�to-wit: AYES: NOES: COMISStONERS: A�45!k- COMISSI&ERS: 1v �..,. Fxd�, ci tj LU CL arT ss.Y.�Y� M dwr f ..�QAAYYf a6tt c .r hue ° p W.6 BY sf Q <w MR�OCl— wN�NN,�y�y�� g! J$ wMG`+C S Y�V 4"qU� OO N 0 A w� r ♦ M YQ %� ate "2 Ic ,2-1 �s 6 6r�Dy yqT WW a� y�9 11. C�.yLCOCa ., N Gi =21i 'V. • 1 Y ®ElCw00 i�Y CVy �CpyY v D�COC f =a II ¢4yu ��w� C —512 v M Z Yb s t..., LINT � y JJCC aa. Y �t w O �•• Ta �`. w O R _!. T Y ��vY • qu. tit !'w' • 1 Y ®ElCw00 w to v. S p ►la � pY wYY NY • -ae = � Y�s � it SL Yom. ~! ��ry��YgY J Yg ` 0 =t ^ i O a�Sg�EN 11 � �'- v N Kam. Jyy( r � ...� N 19 •t Yl ,. R 0 W pjr �'� 8�� $dam ^erg pOjai ~P! �, X.1Q2 2. j Ca ^66Yjp L NY OrarS�p� O `O C ^E �� Q a'- i• �{��O ap��ys� i -X. ` Ss 'E" 'EN`'an. �i —Z 1ye: v rI_A yr+ - _ i PH fit � s 0 'F. +a $�j �.'.�M Wit Nr.G c CI � _t 6 CC yyD+ .Y�6 YM 6�r. �jyY `IrC P• P y tl.N� P § !R�ab A � T ;330 t Y w. s �fi VOL Cy�M� 0 « .OIQPTr d KV M L; pi �$`�€ �'� 8�� $dam ^erg $� •.".g� � ~P! �, X.1Q2 OsO$ IA Oita — i -X. ` Ss 'E" 'EN`'an. �i —Z $ v N ~ t! E PH fit � s 0 'F. +a $�j �.'.�M Wit zg N Y.I 171 Y &- fibs IN, it Nei r i.ga d C� his � hec ~� zM S1 � N Vim. R. Y y p N �� 10.1 OO a 125 i fi <..L 2 N �$`�€ �'� 8�� $dam ^erg $� •.".g� � ~P! �, OsO$ cV Oita — i -X. ` a 'E" 'EN`'an. �i —Z O �±1YV��'*Y �°i�Mw E PH fit V 6 0 'F. +a $�j �.'.�M Wit Nei r i.ga Ir^ zM Mw" Vim. R. Y ri IN Fad "pp 3 ? '� _ 4 -1�� £$'t J Y'A m5p ~'a .51 a^P= liar NVO� Nz Y ^~y� 4 �Y . ♦te r rL{x.`M 'liar �Ca L :q,3 ~_11+ yyyN� eyM MMS.r•~ _C if �1 s� L ird �6�.~ •qY ��.p L�� NON wYU *' N. �9�Oe ~ 'S NM ~L e r L� �c�5{ �'� • �Y4bS ¢ap ��bP�z YV p�}lI a¢iN tCYi �EEsSS33:: NNit 1�•1'.w5g. � c w =`.s L O y E~oeo is m YL' O.L 2owI; S's » Yy ¢ 9.LS 0Y ~-ZO ^e+ N po 13 C OG 0.4C�Y��A Oro gNy�t eirgci Y Sy y� igr ip y� nr« yy Nj'�i 4 S AMVV yqq+ YOi pyy�il1 _L yyH. e/r Lyy d roroY SM ?N w� y. i.i Ry{.� ..' N.i 7 ^. � ^gP• a'O fb�Fi �L »V�Y QLe � "Lw o a$ L p «r Y y p » '� «r •n�asg cis » ;5:; N II 'w Tp N M � S4V NZ, O.L a S's tat btaat&»M yo« » QY R 6. ¢ 9.LS 0Y ~-ZO ^e+ po 13 Y O Y. ` 0.4C�Y��A Oro 0. 4N Sy 4y�S�_�a �µ MyVpy� ip y� nr« yy rte' °s.6 ^u.C�'�3 AMVV yqq+ YOi pyy�il1 _L yyH. e/r Lyy d roroY SM ?N w� y. .�C.CM.y1l �,n O , N NO a &p�V Ry{.� ..' N.i 7 ^. � ^gP• a'O fb�Fi �L � 'YY4. IuN S�•�•. µy. V.�s�EtGwG QLe � •( i5 a$ �A. Stspl �p!pg' �N�� p L.• '� «r �4es cis » ;5:; N II 'w Tp N M � S4V NZ, Q « * p Yx K » N p pqN a[ w » { ei L`M+' C� C «p wgTn ioa �°� •��lr KN `MJ 1% I N2 Q;; e1 w f tjj g7li . , 4 { �•f 2M I .31 k _ SST D^' rd Q' N L+ at � C •4M �6^M.M i0.' YY 4 M JC 1+p 4�N M » M jje� s air gz..ya. a+.. +,aaya�t py.'t NfsK�� GK� Map rte' /- . 'LC�i.`$ i �� 3 • 3s � u�» y�Xlp Lr.,S v YY a 2;6 r !ou gy+..�,�p Y r •�i ' cc• Ik6.L SO ae}�yyq�'pS W.IMG rN ~�Cii aBiza get, w•y� » Ise �LQS�p �•8 p�Cl� p L.• '� «r « U N w� NHC O :C Q « * J+ryc »�yLw +aB i 4 V0 4i IGM c K� Ys E •: r b .a V « N d Ni! ■ L a aM n� Z i II pa ME »Q y• ..6p i L .4-C u 'pVp & y C yMY�k�Sb prAS 0.9 qwY •M �i »t `� X83 -M.y Oz OS m e wt y ~waC.6.L » u ti N 1' IL 0 2 W "I i M g itrAn. u fya 2.R �.1 ■$ yV N i} �4�� °o OH1 SL�` ., wda uec a :rX C,BBl!g ai -s i 1411 G Caw 4 !a L PpY�By y�y 4 aC i LS „_q qg ca $tea eye' .Y+ g 41 PUBS N i�PYIwJ i "I CCi — .qQ D Y YY - Y .. YYV` qN.P� t +f� as.�e. EE O tlyG v C��Y• L YYCaa Y 4 L V V W QY aP61a� 1CL • 00 md� tlXft yNw�y6 yY. 4 E. fi $ TE2 1 v 0 0 f xv fit �Y N 1 r V., its $°`� a N '�Pr S4 pMb� SaPa 946 P ` V:i rob b 4� 4 ■�Ypp y G C Lz Y N L,w SN'L NCN {44. ryap `e�Ln MMy� 3 ee tt _ ■r ¢may a +`,, ..'d: �' Y m•CMaW swr �Y:Q uT Vt ♦w �e �$y'g BQyY $ V H \! I f i M g fya 2.R �.1 ■$ P C 4 rm_ �4�� y it ate p I -� I ai -s i 1411 G Caw 4 !a L PpY�By y�y 4 aC i LS nppfa a� 4�i1C g 41 PUBS N i�PYIwJ i CCi — .qQ D Y YY - Y .. YYV` qN.P� t +f� as.�e. EE O tlyG v C��Y• L YYCaa Y 4 L V V W QY aP61a� 1CL • 00 md� tlXft yNw�y6 yY. 4 E. fi $ TE2 1 v 0 0 f xv fit �Y N 1 r V., its $°`� a N '�Pr S4 pMb� SaPa 946 P ` V:i rob b 4� 4 ■�Ypp y G C Lz Y N L,w SN'L NCN {44. ryap `e�Ln MMy� 3 ee tt _ ■r ¢may a +`,, ..'d: �' Y m•CMaW swr �Y:Q uT Vt ♦w �e �$y'g BQyY $ V H \! I f sat zzi B. �NS =aQNL`` fi y H 'V Q ept q z, jj L Y� LC 1� pL/ Y �Y{sjY7w G2i CSL L1.. m.N� O! a �IH�Np aye. 1A a °S �. $ u - exl YNLC �� R O A da v x y M «p 9 a 1 _� � N c"„ 1177'�'MM� } �o iii t'v. R mb '.�b?� a•.' ;# `"�` .°. S ar..° ';? ;j �' ^'� L +$ fin^ Yf�. MvN..M y6 g fip� 0aY r` i a� Mal xE �g: 36 it > pi a C^l t`. Ytei SC �L S i L •4 N -.rS ♦ 4�9 2RM4—yL-Ce1 eH+ SS xta L'�^ °,,.'p if 7 a ♦ aT C a6p /.�µf. �y 2.1 941 Ott U`wbur +i w as o �-«� rt',jw� ax ;1$oa .f-:3 M _! N C. ►i 1f ��Q991I w HN V,� SC y�jp i1f0 � '^ LpYl d'r �ti � f1st 24 pp,,.� CSt LC yy@ M¢$py q y N iw+.ar q» 4Mg M 4 Yir LW T.�R rah }� ±� »� L�aa�i +ui... �$i`+satpw wsv ueuu �a vaaDt <is >.�d�$u <�.3i �w c +i +� u t aK 221 aV N wz 2-H LU je z it" -Z fli .9 $.4 zz it IN j r ut �g I bg 20' to Lb loo i i t: if i :t gs 21 131; 1 S3 ry 79 1 A =- a lit I . p H t % -a lit- 94 k4a z,, 74 es 3 at :it 1 2 'j U's all j.s r b OF El ICY i RE e .2 4 z yyy(�� Sai K= zsr W" I i ill �vw LLLLU it iiii 3 �,' yy n !• i 2;1 n g N��r 'yy'+•�� ate, �a�.. � �. �' C YY p L� � Y� M {1 N Le i tM j Y,lh ,!Y ° °yI I p O� L I O 4� � N� ��°. pC Cq�r•Q p` O� ` q� VOfv a Lw q « °Y ! E »8 L IS p - a Hai A N Yl 1Cj ryt o I= OYSq •� O'Y r 4 y �W 0.O.�� al g u S{ L r ^bn r sw tl v ZZ. SZ -° L °�T op ud~ NPR Sao \, iiii 3 �,' yy n !• i 2;1 n g N��r 'yy'+•�� ate, �a�.. � �. �' C YY p L� � Y� M {1 N Le i tM j Y,lh ,!Y ° °yI I p O� L I O 4� � N� ��°. pC Cq�r•Q p` O� ` q� VOfv a Lw q « °Y ! E »8 L IS p - a Hai A N Yl 1Cj ryt o I= OYSq al g u S{ L r sw tl v ZZ. L °�T op ud~ NPR I n II I 4 DATE: TO:, FROM: BY: SUBJECT: ^ It V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT c�^�o 0 0 July 22, 1987 197 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner ,Nancy Fong, Associate Planner iv DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85-48 MODIFICATION - GOLDEN BEST _. - A request to modify the approved accent colors or multi - tenant industrial buildings development on 9 acres of land in the General industrial District Subarea 3, located at the northeast corner of 7th Street and Hellman - APN: `209 - 171 -20, 36, 49, 50, 51 and 52. Related File: DR 85 -48. I. ABSTRACT: The developer is requesting that the Planning ComifSsion approve new accent colors for the project described above. Staff is recommending that the request be denied. 11. ANALYSIS: A. Background: On February 12, 1986 the PiannQng Commission ssue a egative Declaration for the proposed project as described above. Subsequently, on April 3, 1986, the City Planner granted finial approval of this project, after the developer revised those plans to address the Design Review Committee concerns of January 16, 1986. In January of 1987 the developer obtained building permits for his proposed project." On March 27, 1987, staff conducted a routine inspection of the site and found,,-that the newly painted accent colors for building A, C,, G and H were inconsistent with the approved color. Staft(Issued a stop work /correction notice on the p,tinting of the building. On June 23, 1987, the developer submitted a modification to this Development Review requesting approval of the new acr -ant colors. At the ;request of the developer, this proposed'icadification was sche6uled for July 2, 1987 Design Review Committee meeting. _ B. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE: The Design Review Committee on July 2, 107 rev ewe a proposed new accent ;colors for thi,, project as follows: Building A (light blue), Building 5 tgray), Building C (green), Building D (orange), Building r (brown), Building F (yellow), Juilding G (sky blue), Building H (purple). In addition to the accent color band, Building A, B,, C and G will have red accent bonds at the office entry. The, ` ,. ITEM IR ..._. u 4 ,� - LANNIMS C0*T"S' S1O4 STAFF REPORT DR 85.48 Modification Golden West r :July 22, 1^987 Page 2 Committee stated that the Pray tone accent color for bui'ld6 0(" is consistent with the approved colors while the rest of the new proposed colors are inconsistent with the approved ones, The CoWittee stated that the new colors scheme cons�s s of Very bold and' - vibrant colors. ili'e approve colors are siMitar in the primary, color but all art? of subdi4ed and muted shades, especially the two blues, the green an4 the purr�e color. The Committee did„ not recaa end Ap.r�pwal (RL the proposed mo ca on as:` ocean cm or sc eme or s ro act. Staff cent: The Design Review Committee has established po1i reviewing projects that all co7ora should camp ament the architecture of the proposed project and should be subdued. Further, the 6ban Design Standards and Guidelines of the,' Industrial, ,Specific Plan states that the Colors, materials and finishes sha-1 be,,coordinated in all exterior elevations of the building to achieve a total contiaui#,y of design. Also, building, materials, colors and texture shall be compatible with those of adjacent or nearby buildings. Staff is of the opinion the the ;proposed %}r color scheme, except for the gray color, bot ohly cowgek`os for attention- of the - building, they become a form of "superg `?kJc" signing, IV. ENVI°ONMENTAL`ASSESSMENT: In reviewing this modification to the eve oilmen ev 1; ew, staff Completed another environmental - assessment of the project with Vie-: proposed change. Staff determined that the new color-`schemelfor the eight multi - tenant ou174ings woa7d not create any significant environmental impacts. V. RECOMMEROATICN: Staff ;recommends the-,; the Planning Commission deny "mod1f1c t'1—e a 3o`n to the 6eveiopment iteview, through the adoption of the attached Resolution and direct the applicant to repaint the rroject per the approved colors or resubmit a new color scheme for vasign Review Committee review and approval. Resp ally submitted, r r City PI nner 88:NF :vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location-,Map Exhibit "S" - Approved Site Plait Exhibit "C" - Approvdd Elevations Resolution of Denial � � {'. ;�'.• ,. .fit °<` t ' t 1 Q E �ifk cm .aip , Oki P t„ 7 41 , ", 41-F V 1i f _- ME] Ilia slim R- ei "W7 Tor- R- ei Tor- 14: rh bLA -16 :. „t It ^ • .K :� •rte i � 1 :� '.. "r� ti a -tt.'t es��« r-t%�• • �.�t '� �" - R: IV if zr q- _ =r�. t;q �'•3k �- 'y�' } s �s ,�- Acv �.. E..., RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,'�LAk nG L12 9ISSI0N uENYING MAIFICATION TO DEVELOPMEN: /REVIEW NO. 8,J-48 TO ALOW NEW!-COLOR ACCENT BANDS FM ,"THE EIGHT 48) '�4UL1'I- TENANT INDUSTRIAL. BUILDING �gM' LOPI18 LOCATED �,T THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 7TH STREET AND HELLMAN AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT - APN: 209 - 171 -20, 36 , 49, 50, 51 AND 52. A. Recitals 1. WHEREAS, Carli Architecture, on beha }f of Golden West Equities, property owner for the subject site, filed an application on November 13 1985 for Development Review of eight buildings on` approximately 9 acres of land.. 2. WHEREAS, the City P1-nner granted approva'7,,of Development Review 85 -48 on April 3, 1986, 3. WHEREAS, the 'pproved plans and material sample board, which .includes a color pale *,ie, on file in the Planning Division indicates that the approved color palette consisted of subdued and muted colors. 4. WHEREAS, the bu }_ldings were painted during construction with fold, viorant colors that are inconsistent with the approved color palette for thus project. 5. WHEREAS, Golden West Equity Properties has filed an application for the approval of new accent color bands for the project as described in the title of this Resolution. 6. WHEREAS, on the ,22nd day of July, 1987, the Ra>>cho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeGIng to consider the proposed project. 7. WHEREAS, ali legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.i ", B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it rs hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Coinnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as fol `ows: 1_ This Commission hereby specifics' {;ly finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and "orrect, 2, Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced Ouly 22, 1987 meeting including written and oral j staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The proposed new colors for the accent band do not provide for compatibility with the existing and surrounding buildingsi, and air' in , conflict with the Urban Design Guidelines of' the Industrial Specif;-&--v-11A. m.. b) The shades of caTor chosen for the accept hands s are bold and vibran'z where application of these colors on the building would create an ` aesthetically site. ' �+offsnsiye y. }'Sased.upon the substantial a Bence presented to this Commission during thewttyyEve- referenced public hearingi,tand upon the specific findings of ' facts set f ith In paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and `follows, concludes a a) That the pragosed modification to the Development Review is not in accord with the objectives of th,t\ Industrial Area Specific Plan and the '. purpose of the District ;n which the site is located. 1 b) That the proposed modification Would create an aesthetically offensive site. c) That the modification 'does not comply-with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions sipt forth in paragraph 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the request for modification to DevelopmenijReview 85 -48. 11 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 1W. TI G PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry T. c _e ,.. a rman ATTEST: - Brad a er, Beputy—Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secrofsry of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning 'Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT':. COMMISSIONERS: `# q ` :. U,an2za se art .. d 14`' SUITE l24 ATTORNEYS AT LAV � .• .1J6M IS� CtNIQ CENTER LAW QFROi3t, 'ES BANS, J12. ��'�� ,jW=66 crVIC CENTeworwe j THOMAS B. RYGCH+E i r.Amcf b CUCAMdOA. CA,2{'FORNIA 9.17,30 1 -dujy 15, 1987 0 U� City Clerk Girt' of Rancho Cucamonga s.eline Road a Cucamonga, California 92730 w; P.E': Tract 13,063 - Citation, APN 227 - 071 -07, 11 and 20 Dear Clerk: J ' Enclosed is a check for one hundred twenty six dollars ($126.00) which is your ire for an appeal from the decision of the Planning.Commissiotrjmade 8; July 1987, agenda item N. Although we have several concerns and do not wish to have the appeal limited, to any particular aspect of the tract, our primary concerns at this time are: 1. the perimeter walls; i" 2. windbreak replaceeent reoruirements 3. lot configuration, house placement on lots, a side setbacks, 4. waste disposal-,- 5. traffic circulation. Please nrite our apppeal and inform me of toe hearing date before �he City Council. ncere %y, I awes an s, cc: Gary Collins, Ray Trujillo OF E 6 encl : check , C1i0 GU�C,'A (j i'Gfi ►S7'RaN AN J1� 18 128? , t; 0 I] N .G0VTNGT<tN G CRCJWE r ATTOPttVZY5 AT LAW TELEPHONE (714) 9083.9393 1131 Wt= 5T.51XTH S7FE�ET FAX 1714) 391.6762 POST O.P'Ftce LOX 1515 O NTARIO.I CALIFORNIA 91762 Jull, 17, 1987 0EIUS1) CITE! OF RANCHO. MAMMA ADMINISTRATION JUL 1.71987 Planning Commission - Am -.- :. ' on City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamon CA 91701 a MAURICE G. COYINGTON HAROLD A. BAtLiN ' I SAMUM CROWE ,yY GEORGE W. PORTER ROBERT E. JOUGHERTY DONAI.� G. HASLAM 1; RO '. ,;SCHAUER EI I;ARO A. HOPSON .!!ANTHONY SMITH �TEPMEN R. WADI .KITE R. ANDERSON, AVDREY A.. P €RR1 RANDALL J_ PITRE TRACE L. Ti8®ALS OERALO R. GATLIN SHr,ILA M. JAMES ME". �ilE FISCH _ ROb:.RT )t WEEDER REBECCA MASS , 4` � k Rancho ga, Rea Appeal From City Planner's Decision in Minor Development Review 87'-24 - Proposed Addition to,- r a 50 Craneway to an Existing--Building Applicant an,,A'Appellant: Tamco _- Lear Planning Commissioners: '?Tamco hereby appeals each and every condition imposed by the City Planner in connection with Minor Development Review 87 -24. Those conditions are contained in the City Planner's letter dated July 8, 1987, addressed to Gerald L. Telford, a copy of which letter is attacned hereto for reference. Tar.co bases its appeal on the ground that each and esery condition set forth in the attached letter is arbi- trary and unreasonable under the circumstances: (1) The fencii,q condition. The foundations (footings) of the present fence are not designed to with- stand the added wind loading tha,�, would result from the addition of slats. Winds in the'Etiwanda area :routinely are in the 80-90 mile per hour range. In addition, the addition of slats or the replacement of the existing fence with solid material, would not serve to obscure any part, of Tamco's operations from view from the I -15 freeway because the freeway is elevated above Tamco's property. (2) The landscaping condition. Because of the ' elevated freeway, proposed landscaping along the westerly property line would also not obscure Tamco's;v-perations from view from the I -15 freeway. Also, the st side of the fence (on Tamco's property) is parallels$ by a narrow access road which separates the fence from the slag pile, leaving no planting area available on that side. �,i a z 777 `" P3.arnincja Gomm�.s,sigra - P - - "j July 17, 19)8T, Page TWO (3) The ng,condition, When Tamco 's w' existing melt shop ng was' constructed, the sid�nci was specifically sel;,eet� , ;b,6cause of its baked -ou f3ni h and long lasting .guaj t�,es in an industrially sensitive, exivi rqn- ment. it was' not sae t.;o be painted. T+an:co doubt's that any contractor w;u3,cT q'uaiant, for any ienled timtQ p-er:,.od, a any product that may be applied over, the exis ing sitiaxsc . Because of the size of the building, it is, estimated that thy' cost of painting, would exceed $1.90,000.00:. Also,, por- tions of the ducting on the roof cannot be painted due to the hot gases which are transmitted. (4) The screening roof- mounted equipment condition. Much of the roof- mounted equipment carr,,es hire temperature 4 gases to the bag -- house and is naturally air - cooled. That air - cooling process tannot be restricted or curtailed, wfilch a solid or semi- s-011d screening would do. Additionally,,, Tamco has serious wind loading concerns about anything pleced on the roof. The ducting extends some 18 feet above the roof peak. Because of' the high wigs experienced in the area., the placing of solid screening material on the roof would create a serious safety problem. er' Tamco respectfully requests that the conditions pertiain ing to fencing, painting and screening of roof- mounted equip ment be deleted in their entirety. Tamco also requests that, the landscaping condition be deleted unless Tam.. ^.o can obtain the approval of Southern California Edison Company to VF-':ace the landspapi.ng materials on th <,west side of the property line fence. All notices and'correspondenc 'concerning this appeal should be sent to the - ,4ersignedd t r t - Respe tfully, , ` Robert E. Aov; pert g Y of COVINGTON & CRONE Attorneys for Tamco REbsjo Enclosure cc: Tamco CITY OF RANCHO +CUCAA' ONGA rae oatae a- eor, a-dw ate., c urea W30,014 sas.iss.t July S, 1987 Gerald L. Telford 12459 Arrow Highway P. 0. Box 325 11 Rancho Cucamonga, 0;4 91739 ' SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW b7:24 - PROPOSED ADDITION ON A 50 FOOT CRANEWAY TO AN EXISTING BUILDING Dear Mr. Teriford: The Development Review process for;�the above - described project hr,.ieen successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the fti Toning findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and coopera'ion during this review process. We sincerely hope that thU.Process his Vvg a positive experience for all involved. This decisio` shah be efftive following 43_itl -dax aooeal period beginning with. the date \`of this letter' FINDINGS 1 A. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. B. That the proposed project is in accordance trith -the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan, the purpose of the district in which the site is located. C. That the proposed project, together with, the conditions applicable thereto, will rot be detriment-A to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vlocinity. D. That the proposed project will comply with each of the applicable'provisiIns of the Industrial Specific plfp. CONDITIONS This project is approved subject to the following conditions; 1. All outdoor storage and yard areas shall be screened from view through a combination of view obscuring fencing and landscaping (Section IV, page 92). IN " -� 0 .Vdyw Deborah N. 3hoxn Afty Kint 00. D=Ws L Smut awia J. Bwpm n Pamela 7. Wert I.wrea K Wlasse=an { gags' a, i(i oiscripg *fencimg shall 4e added? _ — wetemNUrid� ,of the subdect parpl (DXht A 1 i i'en i � be'c* , n 3of a, . tm fight feet: in he i arid sh�a�7g ; oo F boded wit a sold�ay�.af e�atorl ' such +9s «Mo' dtal4 or, ch`n.ic Kik7� aTs._ = D.etaii edw 3 �I;dY,,Ad stia�l be' submitted W th'e Pl annt.�g Div itod for. proval`� p'ritor t� the i'ssuinci of . i boil ill .P i , b. Land 11-19 % . s. primarily :drought tpd:grant in nature. sha l bea added= along fie vtester7y, 1pr9trtY boundary a� s�h_a�i�,coesist of _fast" growing evergreen. k= trees, plan, ed � fleet' on center, inters rsed With m fast growing ergaeen shrubiry. u 2. A landscape and itria,tion plap shyl be submitted to the Planning Division for ,View and appro la l prig to the issiiar�e of building peIm tS� ; (ll 3, In regard to 'the two, (`g) options for the proposed addition: a a. If the 'permanent ", or fuller enclosed f1lition is constructed, the entire building and ;,<addition shall. be repainted to provide a consistent color; b If the temporary craneway structure is constructed, _viy the new addition need to be painted. If proposed color scheme is different from that shown on the proposed plans, it shall be submitted to the punning Division for review prior to the issuance of builcang peace .s•, 4. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened with a solid enclosure which is arc.itecturally compatible with the building design. Any roof equipment or exposed ductwork which cannot be screened shall be painted to match the building. Detailed -- elevations of the roof equipment enclosure, shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and 6ppreval prior to the issuance O building, permits.. Please note that conditions may specify completion of', :ertain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits. i IIII • , IMF you shoo* hie ti + dY Joarni p s peC f is dn tffree t6 coma #lr in ,o ,✓a y 5inceretl, 4 COMM—UNITY DEVE-LopM ;01PP, �{ TFlW u; Per City P annex 4° Ba *CK :ns -! Attachment: .Rr �Y it yy tf F `J - W ' 14.'.'i `. g � '' rn �! / — .vrr 9.• .t 2-r c RUU7'� •4 Par.I ADS 14.33,8 A C IM AG � a 19.2 rw aes 3r: ; ir1GV7 f � F'oc 3 F € f s a, � tl N6 [i. a\ �� \ti.lro. w.Ta��T�i�Y�e4/�It l�fKfl�r �P: i � a'�• w �t ` '. CITY OF / - j t - "'57 C YoJYt «ir/ 4 �y/Y {i(t1L]JI'k v �I 'Ji r _ Fl July, lks. 1987 , fit?' RECEJVED �. ti f Crrr OF RAr4 .- C0CAWNgA PLARNM nrmlori JAIL 2 198.7 Heap Mayor Stout and Council Meaiers.[ „ The encigsed' appeal is being submitted behalf of the residents of 0�mino Sur and Sierra Vlista regardi, tentative tract 135,41. fiAso find enclosed a map illus -trating our propbs3ed alternative. � � i Any questinns regarding this app eaa or -our 15roposed alterna. -.I.ve gray be directetofiahelle or Thar I,insd3eyJr. 8479 ,Camino Sur. 98.5-4432. Thank you for your ceisideration. F Michelle Lindley CITY OF RANcHa C,VCAAj A ®M!NlST,�A7C)AN 5 � Jul,x 90 19:37 ,. Razicho Cucamonga City Council AOL City Hall 9320 Baseline Road' Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: ,Tentative Tract 13541 l Dear Mayor Stout. and Council IIemberc: We, the residents on Sierra Vista and Camino Sur, wish to..,._ the decision made by the Plann:p2 ,Commission on ' E Tub 8, 1987, regarding the proposed uevelopment of the 4. :acres of land located north of "Red dill Country Club �2 Drive at Sierra Vista. We have no objections to' the d?velopment in general of the alove, refer6nced parcel, as we .agree that s ?�Ich development c 6uld increase the value of our homes. We do, however, object to the proposal that Sierra Vista become a though street for the following reasons: k" 1. The homes on the west side of Sierra Vista are ! currently faced with the dl,sadvantages`of having no view; and an Edison company\,easement with power -lines cutting through the west s.iat of our 7 ?ts. Theretbre, we feel the only real .,Taiue to those h -�mes an the west side is the fact that there is very L4-mited traffic on Sierra Vista. 2. Both Sierra Vista and Camino Sur are\ poL;:ed to all.ou for golf cart traffic and several' "af the .residents on these streets who are members'of the dbuntr:''Club do travOxse these streets regularly n their slower moving gole'carts, a fact that all of as on the street are aware. - and cautious ]f. due to the narrowness of existing streets. 3.. Several of the families zn Sierra -Vista have smaIJ children who would be exposed to the- addiui,oaal dangers of the increased traffic on a throu3A street. 4. The ingress /egress for this proposed project is= anticipated to be. from the south end of the develop- ment at Red Hill Country Club .,)rive ho4ever, with the majority of major shopping being to the north on Baseline and 19th streets, it seems logical that if Sierra Vista were a through street the new residents would drive north on Sierra vista r!�ther than south to Rcd Hill Country Club Drive, then north-on Vfar11 '' lsta or Alta Cuesta. 5. Even .3hough onlyT 2 _.its are proposed, most families today have a minimum of 2 cars, `or possibly 3, with a teenage driver) which could conceivably nearly double the cu,sent :raffia flow on.Sserra 7isti and Camino Sear. We h }ve lived. -with the.. potholes'= anc1'eroding sutfaces of these street�!Yor som4 time but the possible addition of " r. r Rancho Cucamonga City o ancil Re: Tentdtive Tract 13541 - page 2 traffic from this proposed development would further contribute to the existing erosion. 61�. =:! Current city requirements 'for residential streatss{{II require a 361 width of paved/street in addition to cup.b sidewalk and parkway area. 6i.ice Sierra,, Vista and Camino Sur have only a 201 width of paved street, opening :sierra Vista to through traffic will, we feel, create a hazard due to the abrupt narroxi4q of the street from.3-6 feet to only 20 feet in width ad the City's Rngineering Department .ias stated`thai ;,they have no plans to widen the existing paved surface on s',erra Vista or Camino Sur.. Sierri,',Vista currently dead -ends at the north end of the street and is',accessed only ria an approximate 90 degrae turn onto Camino'Sur. Due to this configuration, a member of the Planning Commission agreed that traffic faced a'much more serious hazard in accessing the proposed development from the north than from the south. s, The development company stated that they intend to�widen the entrance at the south end of their development, remove some existing tall shrubbery to prow "lde better visabilityx and agreed to install the necessary signae to create a four -way stop at the entrance to their project and Red Hill Country Club Drive. The Planning Commission seemed to h43-- ,no problem with the idea,, of leaving Sierra Vista a closed street other than for access of emergency vehicles. That being the casts, we would like to propose that an alternative Flan be adopted to provide access for emergency vehicles while still restricrting the flow of through ,-,traffic, by means of a cul -de -sac or similar configuration at the north end of the proposed new development with a crash -gate ac%7ess for emergence vehicles. On contacting the Foothill Fire Distr ^ct, they voiced no objection to the idea of crash -gate access and, in fact, such access has been in existance at the north end of Sierra Vista at the entrance to the private road for marry years. The development company does not plan to build-on, or occupy their proposed sub-division, and stated at the Planning Commission meeting their willingness to work with the existing residents. Therefore, we hereby respectfully request the City Council to either overrule the Planning Commission decision, or uphold the decision with the revised condition that Sierra Vista remain =a' closed street while providing emergency vehicle access,thereby protecting the value of the existing homes, reducing the risk of accidents, and maintaining the more rural environment that the existing residents value so highly, r We.thank you for your consiciation in this matter. P' D �I amp Nanye . ' " - s` c kddress / Address r7. C % Address Address Rani�ho cucan4i6a. city council Re:. Tentative Tract 13541 ee Na of Addrrjess Name Address (� Namq Address 'Address Naige me IIA Address'- o r f -ll G.�lMtiltC3 1 NA Address DLOe Address l Address e N e v -- Address Y 79 Name Address Name Address J Address Qt 1Address Name' Address amp Nanye . ' " - s` c kddress / Address r7. C % Address Address .F 66 73 a7 72 it cd 6i9i 71 7 td 8 1 r69 r°. ♦ N Cf La Q 19 6 12 L FAY acw.c L'S 1 M ok 10 F ,. h r wo i L. a vla✓ ,�. .,_qEQ, . nikt f 3 1s ft' TRACT NO. SU6D1Y v 4769 M.31 z ,.. 15 ,� a,set✓ c 1 .� 23 `? 7y .,,.✓ LO, 14 13 RFD HL SL+o. 12 I Ms. 2'y 33 l Q CI'T'Y OF �► CUCAMONGA \\ 66 79 Eo v t 67 72 f 1 69 O. ! 19 t 12 lip Fp. .. .. ., lo 1 �. H.OMN rt CIVM 1I� _ 16 RM mil iCF NO. susc;j v ISr 23 PORI re..srN LO' + d„14 13 12 ... RED HILL SL -. • M.S, ,e1:33 N POFVION LOT. 13 w� ii I No . CITY 01.1 _' ING DRISM 1 V,77 7 4 i 1? afy � 67 72 U 11 --- _ Ld d. 1 68, t/; 1 7 Ed 70 AP 12 1 ,� j W 1.. 173y 10 t' y �`I , If 7 � Nom. i � i, n,.ae.✓ ..:p.f �p�.11� —i- BANE 11 a tJ 22 A_D J ? — w MtY • 1 �� re�rsa� t 'tJyC? NO, �JDI 1 jl —V I5 •� .. aF } 3069 0 o T — 23 POR? LO .,.. 14 13 — 12 RED HILL, I SW. • M.S. r ` ?OFdiION LOT 3 Q r, CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.Mr0.XG,6x R Air ING DRIB M �✓ E.'{t-itt3t?t' _ 8 iw,, -`�11 f Wt s . "WI-W1 July 17 19`8�T Re: Tent, -�.ve Tract 1554 C 11 Dear Mayor Stout and "CO,uxci4. Members: - Regarding the appeal regaos'ting tha Sierra vista not be made a through street, I would like to express my personal 'feelings- in acdiLion to the reasQrs state ` in the areal. r .Although "Recv, Hi-U Pr Cates" primarily developed duet to -the Country Club, that isn't.,why many of us today. live on lithe hill ". As you know, Red' Hill is a� N'nique one -�of-a -kind area - a somewhat rural, �no.unt& In�esque. h en in the midst of' 'a very rapidly i growing city. It is fox that enviram en"t that many 'of us chose to buy out homes here. I never :truly realized how aocustomed I had become to the sounds of traffic until I moved onto the hill and experienced the wonderful world of ",quiet;',! I quickly discovered that I really ` love being able to drink my corEfee, each mo ing.while listening to birds chirping rather than cars asst z The size of the proposed drevelopment and how many cars it may ` or may not add to the traffic passing my hod.- ;isn't necessarily the g issue..; If it only increased that traffic by one car, that's one more Lian we have now and the thought t1 13t it —could be five, or ten, r or twenty, depresses ;me even more. I e -4lize that our i1rurall, setting doesn't :appeal to everyone but it obviously is our choice or we "'wouldn't be appealing this I` proposed c)ange. Those that prefer to live in a more "modern" neighborhabd with sidewalks, street lights, and through traffic, E'~ have many choices of location within the city_ Those of us that prefer not to have very few. You, as our Elected representatives, are faced with a tree mendous task in dealing with; -he incredible growj;h we are now' experiencing. I appreciate the fact that requiring improvements in new developments is one way of planning for the future, aad I respect your concern and effort in trying to make it all work effectively. In return, I hope you will respect our desire to be able to enjoy our homes as we have in the past. I realize that development: is inevitable in undeveloped areas and that many times re- development benefits the community as a whole, but I somehow doubt that the "community" really cares whett 6r not Sierra Vista becomes a through street. Those of us that lid on it, do. -W�_areii't asking that you prevent the development of an un- developed-parcel of land — merely that you not allow that development to,unnecessarily infringe on our rights as current residents. Respectfully, i 1 Di$.ra 5taggs 7¢62 Sierra Vista Rancho Cucamonga, Calif.. a t t CST CI�Q X O1�GA � +via MGR; V.I�J. J � rA DATE July 22� 1987 19,77 =n TO: Ctrairman',and Members of tiro P""lnn Commission ` FROM: Al an warring p.s„ocsate P1.�n�ser- P SUBJECT: MODI'ftCAT1ON- T0.!ooT ?iILL MLEV 4D SP €CIFIC PLAN TEXT Pursuant to Planni .bg Commission direction the Wyanges no on th i attachment will be incorporated into the approved plan doeume t Man Use Matrix and Per*itted a�:d Co��ditionai,Uses ista) prior to forrtardig to the City Council- Thest� modifications were inadvertantly omitted from those listed in July 22, 1987 report:. - r AW:vc r_ Attachments: Amended Land Use Matri;« L-: 14 ,j i i c 71-1 0 �J PM MTTTM Amn rn81TTYnw im. 7 -71-n7 Subarea One Subsea Two Subarea three Subarea Four Retail Cow.rcial Uses — SC CC O tR P SC CC D U SC CC i:0 LM MU M CC RRC )R U fl? . Antis GPs x x x x Appareli S FX *liance Stores and Repair x xx _ X x Art, Music, and Photographic Studios and Supply Stares X x X x X x X X X x* Atn�.'etic a, .s Health Wo and Weight R:4ucing Clinics X 0 X D X 0 0 ! X Xa Avtr, Service Station D a 0 D D 0 )j D 0 Auto Service kh;ding matorc ., yel2s, �~ ,oats, ' ailers, raalo�ee�ss1. a) Sales (wdth ann'lIary repair) 0 0 0 b) Rentals _ �•• ••--•• CF'*7iftlar'7wa'rf F nb - ,••••• include major engine nuork, ffkler ships' palatc.lgg, body 0 0 0 j win AutmliC i(ash1ng :!1 ) Parts and Suplies X x X X X Bakwies (rewil only) x X X x : X x x X X X Barber and hauty Shops X X x X X X X X X x X X+ Bed k Breakf-.t 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 bicycle Shops X x x X X X X x X X x X X X Xt x x 1t imprint and %tncapy Services Book, Gijt and Stationary Stares than (other adult related material) X x X x x x X X X x x x Candy and Contiectioitarles x X X x x s x x X Xt Cetering Est ;bl s3umts X x x x x x China and Glassware Stares x X X x X X X xf Christmas Tree Sales tots (operating on a temporary basis) x x X X Churches 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 O Cle.ming and Pressing Establishments X X x x X X X x X x Cocktail Lowge (bar,, lounge taF- n) including related en!er6iamrent 0 D 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 A Coaaercial Recreation: a) In47or uses such as Bowling anu billards R 0 0 0 0 0 a b1 Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketL 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Convalescmmt Facilities and Hospitals 0" 0 0 0 X x 0 0 0 0 0 Curtain and Drapery Mops x X X X X Dray Care Centers D 0 0 D D O 0 0 0 0 Delicatessens and locialty Food Stare, x x x x x x x x` z zt Drug Stores and Pharmacies T X x x x x X Farws 1(arkets x X X x; X Flow Cawing .' x X x x x .. Florist Shops `1 X ;' X X x x X X X z z 4 fi+ LfEfi eof1 P, ( July 221, 19.87 Cha ma� and embbers;' "pf this P finning Commission �. City of Ranch amonga'° l° -- San Antonio Communiti, Hospital Subject: Rerouting of Red Hill Country Club Drive After repented requests. the City has refused to offer any kind of notice for preparation regarding the Planning Commission's meeting or an agenda. We were Informed that said agenda would be handed out only at the meetincr • The City has never responded to us. concerning our report submitted by a professional f- ' traffic engineer. To this time, we have not been able to respond to questions raised by the Olt, in regards to our report. Our report was based on concerns void ed by City officials through interviews, and the traffic capacities and statistical projecti�Yis obtained from the City's traffic consultant, DKS ;Associates. We are surprised to learn th.�'the City's repot: discounts our report, premised` in part on the incorrect statement that oih �: report k sed on unreliable sources - Vne City's own consultant. �� ty_ ��,�ucamonga� �, . In light of the above Circumstances, 'we feel strongly thi.' Ci of Ran. has not obtained adequate in turmation nor fully pursuel ,she issues 'to the degree required to make learned recommendations to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Ronald L. Sackett, President � 1 Z ...�..• 9g9.aaaUiflSfCirM%ad. lPWnd.{ 0(1.18.9 Z$Gk�17 ii 11. AMMVedby ihBJoichtio¢uz�sSan� 4{ 4 Lee H. Pearce 5 i P-116 rb � <' ' Alta Lonrai C fa 9170E c\\ `L--, j rc —R E PIE I V E a-- 4) f11iY OF itAf1GH0 OU0AhtON6A 6 . is pLRAEN�l4G' DNISiON .; �iL ;� i i987 AM pm l ) sz C i • TTT E y ' X" .r� �w •' 't +tf�y;l� C: l4; .r Lee IL Pearce r 746 T§par AIM i0mal CA 94701, Vy VI 4 L , � f Q ,.- �, `...S�C.'t. St..�J� ... L'��3'v�,1 4•�La..� \ 'I L1l.a ��1 �`3l1'�. c�.�' j�a- �.a1+' i tom" -•�__ `I,�..st.. a ;..�� 3 r - f� t y: N Fri �,' (?� r • h '°� � v 7N};�� LomikCA 94 "m 4 �f �\•�'g1�..,Ies � �S.T�F��+ t3�.M' �,^�Zyw++�� ? \� +sI Y \,= AM � kUz 111 . � I 1 C'