Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1987/08/26 - Agenda Packet
v. NINt COW ON, WEDNESDAY AUGUS'P 2&,1937 7.00 P.M. P LIOti lzt t3i?11dhY JN,RY CENTSB �ht1�AE"3;LINE- R"(1][€Q,CUCAMORGA,CALIFOTifM L Pledge of Al fence U. Ron old :.r_ Commissioner Biakesley_ Commissioner Emerick Commissioner Chitlea Commissione r McNiel Commissioner Tolstoy IIL Announ&aenis IV. Consent Cdendar The following Consent-Calendar items are expected to,.-be routine and nor,-control y.-AnL They wYil be acted on by 'ii;�) Commission at one ;imvr A--ithaut discussion. If anyone has concern over any item,tt should be removed for discussion.,, A. ROME OCCUPY." ati1 11t'.WIT 87-255 - CISNEROS - A Resolution apptoT r :.appeal to allow childbirth classes within a single far Jl; r. sidence at 10736 Sundance Drive. °(Continued from A +.=t 12,f 1987) v V. Public Wirings The following, items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related prrject. Please wait to be recognized by the Phairman and addrd:;s the Commission by stating your name 1 and address. All such opinions shall',be limited to S minks per individual for each project. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL' USE PERMIT 87-28 MESSENGER - The request for a Master CUP. to allow Business Support Services, Convenience Sales and Services,,and Food and Beverage Sales in Buildings 1, 2 and 3 62 an approved Industrial business parki in the 0 neral Industrial,District,Subarea 2., located an.the south sale of Arrow,at Bear uu?to5 Place-, APN'1s9-0i2-19. (Continued from August' 1987) - 'i... Y' lJ. '+'NaVlIR. ' :1' 11I it T .1-WFOJ#,"a a�.T�OR.: goo Il cez L —11 , `r .iSG �MbFrNIAlYlO�&p^.�,p 8ff�0313 'T{o� nside��a,;` 11 reeoenaon^ br oe>"tieat ,. the a? ai nPeet �e for th �Plant eIIal;Plan Amet) InEi1t N63f project: Tfe l,� 9oee%fir.ll consists of detailed.San$ eg�ilatians and elan., ds tlje :development,along Foothill Boulevatd bery Gr -ove7 Avenue,ajul,raven Avenue,between the 2, 15 Fke6way ihd East Avenue. ° �. ENVIRL'?I�NTAI, ASSESSNT lAl!TD GIN°ZfItAL PLAN AMFat VWWe •&7--03B-t3Ftr OR_ Bt,AZtif ONG A A reques.:t to amend the I and so Alap of tide Geher-aT 1 plan to reflect land;us# changes propose,by the 1?<aothili . Boulevard Specific Plan ed ftom Jifly 22,19k) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS ENT D 'x'EtT, 'A�IV:F TR,07 T NO.: 1312 I,1 ISl R-- $ - e" to al deV" opment of n residentialsubd)vYon of 10. -acres within the Medium (4 14 dwelling units per acre,)land use designation of the Ter; ' Vista Planned Conjfmun ty into townhouse,condominium units on a single parcel located at the nortb,44$t corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken- APN 1077 091-29. ra ENVI 4DNMEXTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPhSENT CODE AhiEN�3MINT &7-01 CITY OIL RANCHO IL I ! An amendment to Sections 17.02.1 S'0 and 17.06.020 c of the Development Code pertaining to the- definition of and review process for state mandateii reeycllW fae"litles. i1 ft ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13&44 - NORDIC A residential subdivision and design review of 24 single family lots on 16 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling l units�!yer acre),located at the southeast wrner of Hermosa Avenue and Vista Grove Street -APN 201 101-06, 08,•11, 28 and 29. Associates with the tract f>F,`� g ee Reanoval Permit 87-29 requesting the removal of one east-west windrow and selected trees frdih two other east-west r windrows. 0 � S �\ H. f.c M er�f subi sia�r,of 79:2 acres.d lanq 'Yo,32 �a "^if the and sserat Elk IJistfie t:. area Y6� owated at t Ito iag, corner of bra hib d Avenue and ourth , Sts'eet 210=062� $, 11, 02, 6, 33,'tind 32. y)Relate Fisp: D3 $'fi7. VI. New L. ENVI3307t L ASSESSMENT AND DEVELO,WENT R'E}tIEW 86 37 - EEITII QdMk J3Y/LI7S1 )GC?Ml'A1�?Y Ttie aevelopnent of a Master . an for:a 79.1'd acre indusfrral park consisting of 33 lots,in an Andustrial Park Distret, Subarea 16t-Iocated.at the northwest quadrant of 4F,t,Street and Arehibald Avenue-APN 210-0:62-02,11,13,- 262 82 and 33;. Related File: Parcel Map 10393. j J. TERRA VISTA COM14UMTY PLAN AMENDMENT NO.4- SAN ANTONIO F ospITAT,' r.. K. OFFL_SITE SUEZ;VISIGN DIRECTIONAL.c.,IGNS L. TENTATIVE i�CT 13475 DESIGN REVIEW WDS DE?►ELOPMENT-Desigtit'Review of bvffd_ g elevations and ' site plans for a previotfsly approved tract map consisting of 29 single family lofts an 7.94 acres of land In the Low Density Re.�dedfial D14rict (2-4 dwelling units pen acre), located on`the east -ide of Ramona Avenue, f,;.-th of Church Street-APN 11G77-301-38. M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOp14IENT REVIEW 87-08 - WESTERN PROFERTIES - The development of an office park consisting of four 2-stery buildings totaling 250,000 square feet on 16.58 acres of land in the Offie-\Park Distriet of the Terra Vista Planned Community, Iota ed at the northeast eornE2 of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive-APN 1011-1-91-06,10 and 09. Related to this proposed project is„a Tree Removal Permit 87-20, requesting the removal cf tWb groves of Eucalyptus treeslapproximately 56 trees)1kthin the site. VIL eommisban Humness r 4.`.. - 4 4 YIId. 1,, tblsaYatitc Mi f's-vie gone'!al*place,fo't thq general VL'Wo to oddre3ss:,he mom}';m ,dterx o°he discas.W here are chose-whie do.not al eeoxity poor'On this agenda. cti c:. UL Adj�e"t c)� Tate 3�tartning Cornrrrisstort .has adopted Administrative Re tens,that set are�1,p.m,cdjOWTMeltt tune. _;dte#a a that time, they shalt be heard only with the comerat of the minwion. 3 c p #�•`i1 y.e v� Y ^�r'� ,. '^�:'*+8;;'7;"!'c1Y�,^s-k^nkq''F�"i�y'Ni�/" 7 � � * h r [ ,:. ^ - [ ... .. ...�.� ......., t._•. '''... ,.. ,4 +� a ,� � ..., .,�' 11PHS119 OF INFLilS ICS * Hit LGIDI kil I t I '4 % i A AN t Y I SUM It ; .o. ,ae,: Ci !AIL .ang EWAIYY �,� — fr y M II N t PT VICT NIA s 1u ta, AS CH rzr t -_F x ID HILL �� anR job sc 9 ct lSth .Yth I " 71 atn a w SAN B NNAAIIIN RA£SW Y CITY OF RANCHO +CUCAMONGA mv- ,i �; �s r �,xi „;.,: v az cc or IkAW— o Ct7C®MGr�c�A M 9PORT , kn :' 1 t DATE: August'26., 1987 T0: Chtirrsan.and t06trs of the Planning 'Commission FFOW „F.:' Brad WlIer, City-.planner ` BY: Greg Gage, Assfstant�Planner SUBJECT; HOME OCCU"'kTION. P��41T 87 -25�5. �- G�SRIEROS: A Resoli3t3on appro, no, an appea ' =o a ow-c- classes within a .. single family residence at 10736;Surdante Drive "- I. BACKGROUND: At its August 12, I987 sheeting, the Coiwaission upheld Tff e --TT-- is appeal to,pemft,childbirth classes within a single family residence. The Com isifon also direot"d si`aff toi prepare.a Resolution of Approval, with'�;onditioi to Ii'mit class sizes, hours of operation, and a provision to allow periodic review of the use by staff. The Resolution of Approval' is attached for the ". Commission to review. II. RECOMENDRTION; It is recomanend2d that the Commission approve Home Ocupa on ermit 87-255 through adoption of the attached Resol utio,r. Re fui i Br 1 City Tanner BB:GG:ko Attachments: Resolution of Approval => w �r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING HOME'OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 87-255 FOR CHILDBIRTH CLASSES (WITHIN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE} LOCATED AT 10:736-,SUNDANCE DRIVE IN THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - APN 1077-151-75 WHEREAS, on the 4th day of May, 1987, a complete application was filed by Wrayanne Cisneros for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the It:,�day of August, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga 'Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project,, NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as " follows: SECTION 1: That the fallowing can be met; 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Mode and :he purposes of the district in which the site is located and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, Safety, or welfare, cr materially Injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of tIK4`Development Code; and 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen an s categorically exemp,� in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. SECTION 3: That Home 1ccupation Permit No. 87-255 is approved su!aject to-Tffc-75M owing condi�;lons: 1. Maximum class size shall not exceed 15 persons at any time, exclusive of instructor and resident family members. 2. The use shall be periodically reviewed by the City. If it is determined that the use is disruptive to the surrounding residences, the permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for review and possible revocation. Ar Q31 3''ION NO., Page 3. Phis r p ravir thall ctdt wa :re.c p1ianae wi-th� the-' pro►r3s�nns_of Vie+ De4el�op"nt.Collet oci Tmr+ru,. >+sa Caamtup,ity Plan, Ud udIng 4polft le Ftti a O�etspation' Criteria,.. 4 I-Gstruction at the residence shall snot commence prior to J:Ofl p.m. on weokdays„ and shall not continue pax 16.OD p.,m'2 (Uto) nfghi:� per week APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26-M DAY OF AUGUST, 1487. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �` BV: _ 'n Larry e a vman P ATTEST:= Brad a er, Deputy Secretary tdilk I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the 'Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuca+;*nga, a` a regular meeting of the Planning CowIssion-held ` on the 2fth day of August, 1987, by the"following vote-to-wit; AYES:. COMMISSIONR- S: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS. r — CITY OF R"CHO CUCAMONG4. c��o STAFF REPORT srµ z _ O O DATE: August 26, 1987 c� 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission L; FROM: grad Bulier,, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ,ASSESSMENT AND CQNDITXU',nL USE PERMIT 87-28 e requestor a Master Conditional Use Permit to allow Business Support Services, Convenience Sales and Service, Food and Beverage Sales in buildings 1, r== 2 and 3 of an approved Industrial Business Park, in the General Industrial. District, Subarea 2, located on the south side of Arrow Highway at Bear Gulch Place - APN: 209-012-19. I. ABSTRACT: At the request of the applicant, the Planning Commission on August 12, 1987 continued this item to this regular meeting. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uested: Approval of a Master Condi'sional Use"Permit to aT ow Business Support Service:,, Convenience Sales and Services, and Food and Beverage Sales, and issuance of''Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land bse and Zoning.,,, Norm - Apartment, ear u W-Oark; Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South. y�.Z-aan,=Existing industrial buildings; General tndustriai District, Subarea 2 East - Vacant, Existing industrial buildings; General Industrial District, Subarea 2 West - Existing industrial buildings; General Industrial District, Subarea 2 C. General Plan Designations: roJec e - General Indtist;,ial North Medium Density Residential South - General 'Industrial East General Industrial West - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The seven multi-tenant buildings are presently under cons ruction, III. ANALYSIS: ,J ITEM 8' ¢_ PLANNING,00W-ISSLA# STAFF REPORT CUP 87-28 - Messen'ger` �W Auguust 26, 1987, _ 9 A. Generals On July 23, 1986, the Planning �iomnission con l onaliy_ approved Development Review 85-13_�1for the development of the 26 acre Arrov B siness Pdrh that ahsists of 3• phases. Phases' development inciudes'��,`muiti-Tenant and light manufacturing buildings totaling- 131,Q0,�stsare feet and Phase II development includes 2 warehouse distributiovl r buildings totaling 223,400 square feet, ;ks shown in Exhibit "CO. Both Phase I and II are under construction at the present time except for building 13 of Phase 1I, while Phase III is a (" f future project that is subject to separate development review E � process. r Th2 applicant is -requesting for a Master Conditional Use Permit R; to allow the following uses within buildings..1, 2 and 3 of the Phase I development: Business Support Services, Convenience Sales and Services, Food and Beverage Sales. According to the appli`iant, the purpose of the proposed Master Conditional Use Permit is to upgrade the uses in these buildings along Arrow Route to provide compatibility to the northerly ,residents and allow the leasing of the messanine spaces withi`i buildings 1 and 3 separately from the first floor manufacturing industrial r type of tenants. See attached letter from appli int. B. Compatibility of Land Use: The following are deffinitians of= kTfie three land use types that the applicant is requestto : 6ro in the proposed Arrow Business Park: 1 1. Business Support Services: Activities typically include, out are nor. I imle o: service which support the,activity of Yirms, such as, clerical, employment, protective, or F minor ssing, including blue print services, and multi- copying" of pamphlets and small reports for another firm. Activities not including this category are the printing of book- and services of the personal nature. - 2. Convenience Sales and Services: Activities typically include, but are—no-f-TTmEed to toe retail sales from the premises of frequently needed small personal convenience itims and professional services which - are used frequently. Uses typically include, but are "riot limited to: drug stores, stores selling toiletries, tobacco, and magazines, beauty and barber shops, apparel, laundering and F dry cleaning agncies. 3. Food and Beverage Sales: Activities include, but are not limixed to the retail sales from the premises of food and beverages for off premises consumption. Uses typically Include, ,:but ara not limited to: mini markets, liquor stores and retail bakeries, catering businesses excluding chain type of gro4ary store. 13- , s 71 PLANNING.C".1$S-1,6N $iTAF F REpoRT CUP 87-28 - Meso ger August 26, 1987 Page 3 In reviewing those, uses allowed within Bus/i`ness Support Services such as blue print :;hops; clergy.pal Jand employment agencies, staff believes that they would provid!i compatibility to uses within the -Industrial Park, The reason is that these type of uses would provide a service to`other firms within the Industrial park. bey, would fit well in locating at the messanine within buildfhgs 1 and 3 (see Exhibit "E", floor plan of the' messanine). A review of the proposed uses within Convenience Sales and Services and Food and Beverage Sales indicated that they are more towards the quasi retail type of uses where storefront exposure would be required. These types of retail uses wouTd„prefer ,-.,locate in building 2 with stor�f'. front 6posure to Arrow Route, , However, the applicant has sot aside only 3.,400 sgpare feet in building 2 for these proposed three type of uses, versus a total of 20,300 square feet in the messanine of buildings 1 and 3. Staff is skeptical that these types of uses such as, liquor store, beauty and barber shops, retail bakeries, stores that sell toiletries, tobacco and magazines would locate in the Messanine of buildings land 3. When this project was first submitted ,for staff review in F September of 1985, the ape icapt proposed a` multi-tenant project including a "Master Conditional Use Permit" for service, office and retail types of uses. Staff informed the applicant that the proposed Master Conditional Use permit and the multi-tenant project was not in conformance with the long range plans of subarea 2. The purposo of this subarea is to strengthen its manufacturing and warehousing activities complimented by rail service. The applicant has revised his project several times in an attempt to comply with the industrial Specific Plan by limiting the number of multi-tenant buildings and providing warehouse distribution bu_i"gs.where one of the, boVidings has potential for rail serViL� in Phase Ii. However, allowing a Master Conditional Use Permit `a this time is still contrary to the purpose of this subarea 2. C. Availability of Parki�ng The total gross floor area for the severa n us r a u iiings is 131,455 square feet. The Industrial Specific Plan requires harking for multi-tenant, use where the office portion is less than 35% of the leased space at a ratio of 1 parking space per 400 square feet of gross rs floor area. Therefore, the total number of required parking spaces for this project is 329 spaces. The site plan shows a total of 377 parking spaces have been provided, leaving 38 extra spaces (see Exhibit "0"). The following table shows a summary and a break down of the number of parking spaces required versus provided based ot. the,square footage of the proposed use within the seven industrial buildings: r.a PLANIfIK C 0CUPt� -2tsenge�y. August)2fi, 1'38 Page 4 A - PARKI SUMMARY '- NG, Rumbew of Number of Bldg/Type Squat' Par in.Pa Spaces Spaces, of tise* Fa- °ta$ Ratio Required* Prav9ded. :� Bldg x: Business SupPot�c- Service,, Conoft fence Sales &. �\` Service„ Foat & '��� J Beverage Sales `i�,,400 1/260 a"7 37 Multi4enant 16,916 1,400 40 40 P� 2; Business Support Service, Conuan- fence Sales b _ Service, Food ` Beverage $ales' ,3,400 1/250 14 14 ` Multi-tenant 13,358 1,400 33 33 Rating and drinking Places 2,040 1/100 20 20 Bldg 3: Business Support Service, Convenes �.." ience tales & Service, Food ,. Beverage Sales 10,900 1,250 44 44 Multi-tenant . 17,431 1/400 44 44 Bldg 4t Multi ;inant 11,976 1/400 3G 30 Mu si tenant 14,610 I/400 37 36 8109 6: Muni-tenant 15,630 1,400 39 39 Bldg 7. Multi-tenant 16,795 1,400 42 43 131,456 377 377 *Based upon proposed request for cup. - PLANNING COMMISSf'ON STAFF REPORT Culp 87-28 Mesgenger Augui"� 2 1 1987 Page A review of the above table indicates that the site complies with the minimum. parking requirements base, on the summarization of the proposed use. Exhibitr,`D" also shows that e parking spaces are adequately distributed around , the ,,-yi0iity -of the seven industrial buildings. Therefore staff determines that tt-- site has adequate parking spaces for the addition of these ,�s�asi" re p#1 type of uses sucht- s Business ` Sp"ort Services, Convenience Sales and Services, and food and Bc,.arage Sales. D. Purpgse and Intent of Conditional Use Permit; ll;e purpose of Ifie Conalzional use Permit is to create ex bil�ity necessary, to achieve the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan. Select uses in each district are allowed subject to the granting of a ronditional Use permit because of the unique site development requirements and operating characteristics Which may require special consideration in aeder to operate in a , manner compatible with surrounding uses, The Conditional Use Permit process is intended to afford an opportunity for broad +� public review and evaluation of these requirements: and characteristics, to provide adequate mitigation of any potentially adverse impacts, and to insure that all site development regulations and performance standards are pro%gded ;fin accordance with the Industrial Specific Plan and Devel'(wn }Code. Last April, the Planning Commission has approved a Master Conditional Use Permit to allow Administrative/Office use, Professional/Design services and Insurance, Financial and Real Estate services within the Vineyard West Business Park located at the southwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route in Subarea i. In considering this proposed Master Conditional Use _ Permit, the Planning Commission emphasized that the granting of this Master Conditional Use Permit should not be considered as setting a precedent for the entire City. In summary, the site does have sufficient parking to accommodate the proposed uses. However, these types of proposed uses are considered as quasi retail use s that require store front exposure, which would also medn an expansion of retail uses in the industrial or,o The applicant's request seeks to capitalize on nearby mult#o-family projects by providing commercial uses to support these residences. The intent of the industrial Specific Plan is that these uses were intended to be.supportive of the primary industrial uses. The granting of a Master Conditional Use Permit would set a precedent for the entire City. It could also diminish the opportunity for broad public review and evaluation to ensure potential adverse impacts could be mitigated. (3'S e , Pt itiriilNO 3N AtOOR1 ' l�q CUP 87 29 kfe oaf <' ,r August 26, I987 �' (I Page 6 e E. EnYironmentrl i4s4essment Staff has completed an Environmental t'fiscTl "sfi arrd"has �iieraiined that no significant environmental ' impact will eacur 0 a, result of this prop. W project for !' all owing a � ^ Conditional Use Permit. Parer? a Negative Desiarat3an, his bet issued for tins prdect on 3piy EBB 39.86., IV. FACTS`FOR FI in order for the 'Planning Commission to appreve"tl s pro4ect, facts to support the following findings must be made: i. That the proposed uses - Business Support Services, Ca,:venience Sales and Services, and food and Beverage Sates are in accord with the Gendral Plan, the objectives of the industrial Specific Plan and the'purpose of the subarea in which th`P site Is located. 2. That the proposed uses would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, _, or materiully injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed uses comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. PP' V. CORRE'SPilNi EWE: Ibis ite m has been advertised as a public hearing !' in Ine Daily Report newspaper, the property posted and notices were' sent Ut al I property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOM61ENOATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny u0nHITIOnal We Permit 87-28. However, if the Commission can make the necessary findings, a Resolution of Approval has been provided. Respe,;tful l su ted, BrWBul ler City Planner BB:NF.vc Attachments: Letter of Request from: Applicant &xhib;t "A" Location Map Exhibit MB" - Approved Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" , Detail Site Plan Showing the; number of Parking Spaces Provided Around Each Building Exhibit "D" Floor Plan for Elutl ngs Y and 3 including Messanine Resolution Of.Approval -. r MESSENGER INVESTMENTCOMPANY July 23, 1987 Mr. Dan Coleman Senior Planner Cit;,, of Rancho Cucamonga 93Z, Baseline Road P.O. Sox $07 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 RE: Arrow Business Park DR-86-13 Dear Dais: As we discussed, Messenger Investment Company recrests the approval of a Limit«d Master Conditional Use Permit for the buildings that front on arrow Route. f.;. wish to allow the following conditiona:ly permitted u6es in Buildings 1, ? ez4 3 of our seven buildings which total 131,455 squ+3-re fear of this multi-use tenant general industrial project (total square footage of project including ' ._tdings 8 & 9 is 353,855 square feet, see DR 86-13) . Conditional Uses Requested: I. Business Rtipport Services 2. Convenience Sales & Service 3. 'Food and Beverage Sales This conditional use permit will allow us to upgrade the tenants for the three buildings adjacent to Arrow Route. Thi. would allow the neayaninn spaces in Buildings 1 and 3 to be leased separately from the first floor custom manufacturing/industrial tcsnants. Messenger Investment Company believes chat these uses ,vould be more compatib'_t with the residential areas north of Arrow Route and would create less noise and truck traffic. We havo enclosed a revised parking suruary plan. The building square footage has been calcuiated based upon the net area (glass line) less electrical/mechanical rooms and stairwells. The parking recrairements have 3 t =_16912-A Van Korman Avers„ atvine,CX 92 114 7141474.1300 M. been broken down by use. As indicated., there would be eufficieht parking for 23,700 sc1i 4iim feet of the proposed conditional usss at 1 spaaw",250 squaro-_!;eat and 1t,040 square foet of "eatina. and Vning establish- ments''1 at 1 space/100 square, feet. We propose to div-, ibute these uses betwean Buildings 1, 2 and 3 where the additional onsite parking is located.. The tenant, spaces in Buildings 1, 2 and 3 'arc as small as 400 square feat each. With thn square footage of each use limited, as proposed, Messenger Investment rtP Company wishes to obtain a Master conditional Use Permit to elimimate ,the need to return to the Planning Commission for a conditional use pkrmlt for each tenant. The planning staff could monitor the total allowed. squ_--re footage and restrict the project in € this manner. I have includtid the following items with 2 e letter for this Conditional Use Permit application per your checklist: 1. UnifoxA Application 2. Part 1 of the Initial Stt:dy t. 3. (4, 3 1/2" x 1111 site plan (parking summary) w (4) 8 1/2" x 11'1 sample floor plan of mezzanine. of Building 1. 4. This letter , 5. (5) nets of gumt% d labels for notification of applicants 6. (3) sets of gumme(I labels for public heariiig Zotification 7. e:k in the amount of $398.00 for Conditional 1 ,Permit. . in tiLe amount of $87.00 for Initial Study - Thank yc ,our assistance in the application of this Col-Itional Use Permit. If the application_ is inao .late i.n v way, please notify me. S e - I Sco��Peotter E. Pro ct Manager C SEP/cl cc; Dana Sanders, Messenger Investment Company S Jeff Gordon, Messenger Investment company MESSENGER IN VESTMENTCOMPANY .� BUILDING 1 PARKING 4NALYSIE:_ 07/22/87 10 24 AM TOTAL BUILDING AREA - .a15 SF i) CONVERT TO BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES �-% F REQUIRED PARKING (BSS) i ^SPACE/250 S'r' 37.6 SPACES EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS G SF REGJiRED PARKING (E&DE) 1 SPP S/10Rt SF 0.0 SPACES REMAINING MULTI.-USE ;r£NNAfVf 15,915 SF ALLOWABLE "OFFICE" 3=%. 5,570 SF MANUFACTURING 65% 10,345 SF j REQLV' D PARKING (MUT) 1 SPACE/400 SF 39.8 SPACES f TOTACtAARKING REQUIRED 77 3PACES BICYCLE PARKIKS PRUVIDED 4 SPt'rBS= I SPACES AUTO PARKING PROVIDED 76 SP'ACE•,3 TO-AL PARKING PROVIDED 77 SPACES BUILDING-2-PAn! i!NG ANALYSIS^ 07/22fS7 lt?"ia4 AM TOTAL BUILDING AREA - 18. tg'' Sr CONVERT TO BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES. 3;400 SF REQUIRED PAPKINS (ESS) 1 SPACE/250 SF 13.6 SPACES / EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS 2,040 SF a REQUIRED PARKING (E&DE) 1 SPACE/100 SF 20.4 SPACES ' REMAINING MULTI-USE TENNANT 13,358 SF ALLOWABLE "OFFICE" 35% 4,675 SF ' MANUFACTURING 65% 8,6133 SF.:Z 2- � REQUIRED PARKING (MU") I SPACE/400 SF 33.4 SPACES TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 67 SPACES f BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED 4 SPACES= 1 SPACES { AUTO PARKING PROVIDED 66 SPACES TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 67 SPACES BUILDING 3-PARKING-ANALYSIS 07/22/87 l0a24-AM i TOTAL BUILDING AREA 28,331 SF CONVERT TO BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES 10,900 SF REQUIRED PARKING (BSS) I SPACE/250 Sr- 43.6 SPACES EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS 0 Sp REQUIRED PARKING (E&DE) i 8PACE/100 SF 0.0 SPACES REMAINING MULTI-USE TENNANI 171431 SF - ALLOWABLE "OFFICE" 35% 6, i0l SF - MANUFACTURING 65"A 11,330 SF REQUIRED PARKING (MUT) 1 SPACE/400 SF 43.6 SPACES TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 87 SPACES BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED 4 SPACES= 1 SPACES AUTO PARKING PROVIDED 85 SPACES TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 87 SPACES BUILDING 4 PARKING ANALYSISQt7/e2/87 Y0:24 Ahi TOTAL BUILDING AREA 11,976 SF CONVERT TO BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES 0 SF REQUIRED LARKING (65S) I SPACE/250 SF 010 SPACES EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS 0 SF � REQUIRED PARKING (E&DE) i SPACE/100 SF 0.0 SPACES REMAINING MULTI•-USE TENNANT 11,97S SF ALLOWABLE "OFFICE" 35% 4, 192 SF I'! 1 MANUFACTUPING 65% '7',764 SF 1 REQUIRED PARKING (MUT) 1 SPACE/400 SF 25.'3, SPACES TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 30 SPACES BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED 4 SPACES= 1 SPACES AUTO PARKING PROVIDED 29 SPACES TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 30 SPACES BUILDING 5 PARKINru ANALYSIS `-07/22/87 10:24-AM TOTAL BUILDING AREA - 14,r,1a+`SF i CONVERT T'.7 BC!SINESS S't;1=PORT SERVICES 0 SF RELWIRED PARKING (P,8S' I SPACE/250 SF 0.0 SPACES ' EATING & DRINY"fNG ESi'ABLISHMENTS 0 SF REQUIRED PP,tKING (E&DE)' 1 SPACE/100 SF 0.6 SPACES k REMAINING MULTI--USE TENNANT 14.,S10 SF ALLOWABLE "OFFICE" 35% 5,114 SF MANUFACTURING 65% 9,497 SF REQUIRED PARKING tMUT) I SPACE/400 SF 36.5 SPACES f TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 37 SPACES BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED 4 SPACES= I SPACES AUTO PARKING PR'WIIED 36 SPACES P.TOTAL A PARKING PR OVIDED 37 SPACES BUILDING 6 PARKING^ANALYSIS 07/22/87 10:24yp1l TQT^)L BUILDING AREA �15,630�SF�� CONVERT TO BUSINt^SS SUPPORT SERVICES 0 SF REQUIRED PARKING (BSS) 1 SPACE/2SO SF 0.0 SPACES EATING tR DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS 0 SF REQUIRED PARKING (E&DE) I SPACE/10o SF '0.0 SPACES REMAINING MULTI-USE TENNANT 15,630 SF ALLOWABLE "OFFIC:E" 35% 5,471 SF MANUFACTURING 65% 10, 160 SF REQUIRED PARKING tMUT) I SPACE/40e Srt" 39. 1 SPACES TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 39 SPACCS BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED 4 SSPACES= 1 S.GAG.ES AUTO PARKING PROVIDED as SPACES TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 39 SPACES BUILDINS 7 f ,RKING ANALYSIS _4T 07f?2187 19;24YAM' TOTAL BUILDINGAREA - -� J 16,79E SF CONVERT 6 BUSINESS SOPPORT SERVICES 0 SF REQtUIRED"PARKING tSSS> 1 SPACEI250 SF 0.0 SPACES EfTING & "DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS 0 SF REQUIRED PARKING <E&DE7 1 SPACEl100 SF 0.0 SPACES REMAINING MULTI-USE TENNANT 16,795 SF ALLOWABLE "OFFICE" 35R 5,878 SF MANUFACTURING 65 E 10,917 SF REQUIRED PARKING (MUT) 1 SPACSi400 SF 44.0 SPACESt:< TOTAL PARKING. REQUIRED 42 SPACES BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED 4 SPACES= 1 SPACES AUTO PARKING PROVIDED 41 SPACES TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 42 SPACES f i t I t _ 3• r F/ARKING_AiA1:YSI ,$Iii+1ARY ;f 07/2e167 10:$4 AM TOTAL BUILDING Ake � 1�1,rr5SS SF- � r CONVERT TOE LDS 5 R+IIS. 537 SF � • s REQUIRED PARKING " SA'"S `" '? tSPAc"E1�50 SF� 9k.8 SPACES EATING & DRINKXNG 'ES.TABLrsHmEN7iis3 2,¢40 SF REQUIRED PARKING _�E&DE)_ 1 s;$Av�t/leer SF 20.4 SPACES REMAINING MULTI i�/pE 105,715 SF ALLOWABLE "OFF I OE& } 35% 37,000 SF MANUFACTURING 1 65% 68,715 SF REQUIRED PARKING SMUT) 1 SPACEl400 SF 264,3 SPACES E TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED,; 3579 SPACF&S 5 BICYCLE PARKING ='RC11ZDkD 28 SPACES- 7 SPAC'=S AUTO PARKING PROVIDED 372 SPACES TOTAL PgRKZNG PROV%DED 4-79 SPACES l f �a ' �/,�-q�� ���i°>�r r� :-��`.''•��.,.�.� .; ,�;sue �, eW T Y f • . t WTI, 1 z = o, 14� iYt1 J CONVERCtAL lLDO. LM , _•,i i�±' BLDG. DIDG�� IL . t ,a -mot ._y�'•t� � r� lM;�.TIILIT��-_ , ^w I RM CITY OF rr I PLAI�MrG DWISION FXk-II rr.--g j •�Y•.i:.bOM�. NOi�t.�ti-Y CY,Mp.. — Tn I Y]ew 3 m. ; f h t i s • { _ I �qt4. l ILLIa g LL as _ I t r. I11��!•i t� Ilii I.t1 � I)� ►t ! 1. � ►Illr i?! <.:, rH e 4 � R— -4 La Q ..J ssr. N1ss aGf�lwr"y \, e RXiCJ=6 RDIK� '. I Q MflLa WuT1 U0u �wi �' •�+��M..mac�f aNi.bin I�AL'f h'NInM�.�p� w«..w ew..w •�rrr snu..w Y NO L, GTY OF C Ca nANNM >LiRIb"I(maJ E f�F3>Ci' SCAM. s 4 M a koop RES%UTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-28 FOR SQUARE FOOT OF BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES, CONVENIENCE SALES AND SERVICES, AWFOOD AND BEVERAGE SALES, TYP&SbF LAND USES WITHIN BUILDINGS 1, 2 AND 3 LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF VINEYARD AVENUE,, IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT - APN: 209-012-19 WHEREAS, n the'4th day of August, 1987, a complete application was filed by Messenger Investment Co. for review af the above-described p�" ect; and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of August, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held 'a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the condit!_Ions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable Provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Specific Plan. SECTION 2: That !;'his project will not create adverse impacts on the environment-SIRT-Wat a Negative Declaration is issued on August 12, 1987. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 87-28 is, approved" subject to-fffe-75TTowing conditions., Planning Division 1. This Conditional Use Permit is approved for Business Support Services, Convenience Sales and Services, and Food and Bever-age Sales only, as defined in the Industrial Specific Plan. All other uses shall be subject ILO the land use regulations _for Subarea 2 of the Industrial Specific Plan. 77 m r P�.ANN, C0 SlIOFt�yR�SQt rON NO.. - �� ,m. ��� �• f I✓1tP 8�.28 Augur 12, 197 Page 2- - tiF 2. A maximum.af 9,400 square feet of leased gross floo.,`aret,=*ll >` be allow -ed within 1u iadmaximufor h3 three land uses as started „ n9 3,400 square fkt of leased grass floor area wail be allowed within,buffding �r the three land uses,as stated in Condition Ncr 1y &.Aiaxipum of 10,900 squa-re feet of Passed gross floor area, will be allowed within, building 3 for the three land uses as stated.in Condition No. l- and, a max-Imum,of 4,040 square feet of leased gross floor area • will be allowed within building 2 fur eating and drimkin.g type of uses.. 3. A written document, showing the tabulation of required and rtrovided Parking spaces, and the square footage of leased gross 110or area for each use, within buildings 1, 2 and 3, shall be subiitted, along with each proposed tenant improvement plans and/or business license application fr City Planner review and approval, prior to issuance fit such tenant improvement building, permits and/or approval of business license application. APPROVED AND ADOPTED Tt1.yS 12TH DAY OF ( iGUST, 19$7. PLANNING COMMISSION,,OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC)1- Larry T. FgNlej, airman '- ATTEST: `,,Brad Buller, epu ,,:�r'�"-e a y"— I, i`s 1--,Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of August, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: CObMISSIONFRS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: s� ,CITY OF RANCH©CUCAMONGA ucAM STAFF,REPORT C z `yf{ 1977 DATE: August 26, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROW Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Marren, A sociate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD review.an cons er a rec mat on' or cer R ca ion '_o the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Foothi)1 Specific Plan and General Plan�,Miendment 87-038 Projec The Specific Plan consisis of >detailed land use regulations and standards for the development along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, between the I-15 Freeway and Ed!,t Avenue. I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to cons-i er responses to the Draft Environmental ;:pact Report (EIR) for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plart. this report surdmrizes the environmental issues raised in the responses on traffic and circulation and alignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive. Further, recool'tion of insignificant unavoidable impacts as identified in a suggested statement of overriding consideration is provided. II. BACKGROUND., On July 22, 1987 the Planning Commission review responses to environmental concerns related to the Ftrcthill- Boulevard Specific Plan. The Commission recommended certifi-ation of the EIR and based its approval of the Specific Plan on the findings, mitigation measures dnd statement of overriding consiJeration of the environmental review. The project EIR did not directly reference the General Plan Amendment issues related to the land use changes proposed by the Specific Plan. Therefore, an amended EIR was drafted which includes previous responses to the initial document plus the required references to the General Plasm Amendment land use changes. III. DISCUSSION: As of the writing of this report, the thirty (30) day review period has not ended, __ Responses. fiib. the"Draft EIR have not AML been received and are expected after August 21, 1987. Draft will present comments from interested parties on the night of the public hearing. r , ITEM C 17 PLANNING CG IISSIQN:STAFF REPORT EIR for Foothill',,Bdulevard August 26, 1987 Page 2 , ,d t- 1 ti The expanded EIR includes the staff and consultant responses to comments received prior to and during the auly 22, 1987 public hearing�on the initial EIR. SecausV,,the revised EIR I 'nearly identj^ai to the provious document ;:see analysis and concltasions contained in the July 22, 1987 report are alpropriate towards the review of this amended EIR. One, item of correction is the deec�iption of-alternatives to the Red Hill ;Country Club Drive real;gnment (Pages Y-F-1 thru Y-F-3). In updating the revir.,td FIR the Consultant provided only one . alternative is► response to, the preferred'ozi`gnment in the final Specific plan action. The original two a1 ��: 4ives discussed should remain as a part of this environmental r .t a�. ..1?}+2mfore the attached section (Exhibit !V13 should be included as the Red Hill Country Club DMve dfacussfon in Section F. IV. CONCLUSIONS; The EIR con�lluudes that there are sigrir'i=,t env rorneen a changes and that These are summarized in Section YII of the EIR.,,These changes which occur as a result of the project kk - approval areas. follows; 1. An incremental increav�L to local .1;r poll-'3ant emissions, and a decrease in air quality downwind of the study area. Total air pollutant -missions are summarized in Table IV-B/E' of this document. "Air pollutant emissions will be slightly higher than, those whicii wc:.ld result if the proposed project were not approved.. 2. An incremental increase in the consumption of water,, «_z attendant, increase in the generation of wastewater, com0gred to existing levels. Water consumption and sewage generation (which area discussed in Section IV-K) will be higher than levels which would result if the proposed project were not approved, although levels would continue to increase even if the proposed Specific plan were not approved. 3. An increase iti the a=Lnt of storm water runoff produced j by the project area during storms, compared to existing levels. Ultfiinate storm flows will be marginally higher than levels which woul-I result if the proposed project were not approved. A." An increase in local traffic volu►ces compared to t-xisting levels. The number of trips generated within the stugy area will be approximately 12 percent higher than would be the case if t1le propo,a,'ed_ project were not approved. Further, potential imparts of the revised circulation 1 ` A 1 77 7 PLANNING COW.�S.9(0 i AFF•R£PORT r , EIR •Far FQd' i I #Soul"wand August 2 , ,. Page 3 syst�m card be mitigated or the impruvemestts resulting in an over.AC1 improvement to circulation in the corridor balance`favorably against the potential impacts,_ 5. An increase in noise levels; compared to existin levels. Noise level-s will be, marginally' higher pan "� the pr000sed project were not approved. The EIR concludes through analysj,s,of the alternatives"that-may of ' the potential, impacts. wood odour to the, corridor without' --the enactment of tNe plan as a resirrit o't'.: development under `kisting urth regulatory provisions-. i~ er, port recognizes that the Specific Pian i5 designed iao re the t�gce renwst of the anticipated problems resulting fr. ddv�:l&paw:nt In the corridor, As a result, to comply with CEQA requirements, a Statement of Overriding Consideriivrm-- .must be included with the _final EIR : action. Staff rec&wnds +,:he statement as approved o.r' July 22, 1987, as shown in , Exhibit "A" of the attached Resolution, be considered, V. RECOWENDATION: It is recommended tsat the Planning Commission recommend o the City Council the fortification of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and 'General Plan Amendmt,'nt No, 87"-038 Environmental Impact Report with revised pages as shown on Exhibit "B" by the adoption of the,attached�,Resolutian which includes",a Statement of Overriding Considerations: Res ully s tte ra er City PI nner BB:AW:vc Attachments: :July 22, 1987 Report ' Draft Resolution Exhibit "A" Statibent'of Overriding Considerations Exhibit "B" Revi'sed Pages V-F-1 thru V-F-1 Draft Environmental Impact Report (tinder i, pa` ,te Cover) r CITY OF RANCHO CUG.QMONGA: " STAFF REPORT t UL 43 y 1977 DATE: July 22, 1987 TO: Chainian and Members of the Planning Commission FROM:, Brad Buller, City Planner ' BY Aran Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENYIROHMENTAL IMPACT KC`uP.T FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC -PLAN - TO review and conslaer a recommen3a on or cer c iotl of the Draft.P�vironmental Impact Report for the Foothill Boulevard" S' Jfic Plan project: The Specific Plan"consists of d fled land use rrguiations and standards for the devei(.,., along Foothill„Boulevard betwe-en Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, between the I-18 Freeway and East Avenue. (Continued from July 8, 1987) I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission will hold a continued public fiearing o consi4:r responses to the Draft Environtilental Impact Report (EIR) for the,Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. This report su=rixes the envirynmental issues raised In the response on Commercial land use, traffic and Circulation and realignment of Red Hill County Club Drive, Further, recognition of significant unavoidable impacts is identified and a suggested statement of overriding consideration is provided. II. BACKGROUND: At the July 8, 1987 meeting, the ?fanning Ccmmission resiewed "responses to environmental concevits relating to- student generation, land use and air quality. The Cnission concluded the responseo were adequate in the;. ` areas, but as a result of a request by Lewis Homes, final review of the land use .-s,,sue' was delayed until this meeting. In addition, traffic concerns from the City of Upland, Cal Trans and owner of affected Red Hill property will be analyzed and addressed in this report. III. DISCUSSION: Commercial Land Use: As of the writing of this report, the a i Tana np"uf-expected from Lewis Homes had 'not been received by staff. If the additin--_:,information is provided, it will be presented at the nigWor-trra meeting. 47 M , PLAtiG c �T .+rE R�FEIf RE FOQ1 M1 6Ui1� ARb BPEG�FIC;PLAN HEIR July '.£ Page 2o Traffic CIrG[!'lat3on: The, responses to the Cal Trans, concerns on J ci rcu a are contained In the EIR consultant's mQo, (see y Exhibit "Jul, 25� .t9B7 These .resnorses, which the fng neering.Divi n concur with, will form appart-of the finwi EIR �if the P1 rpning.Comn4 on finds that they adequately addreas the - sta`��d.concerns.. Red Hill Ctiunty 4c1`ub 04riye: The. potential relocation of Red Hil1 �un` y dab fir,ve -oroe Avenue caused coadern by the acfected properly ow€, b the GiV of Upland. Upland's comments�,,are addressed in the 'EIR consultant`s memo of,,3uly 15, 1§87 (see Exhibit "p"Y. The property owner commissioned a traffic study comparing the - proposed realignment with an alternate route to Foothill Boulevard, east of the present intersection. This traffic study was reviewed by i:i1ty staff a,nd the Foothill Plan traffic; engineering cor-3ul �nt. The contents of the study an t e results of,the reviews are summari;^red below: Traffic Study, (property owner generated) Alternate A: Connect Red Hill County Club drive to t " Foothill, east of current; locakion. 1. This connection would allow a progressive traffic flow on Foothill, Boulevard, if sighalixed. 2. Better 'commercial access,; would , be `obtained E because of an additional opportunity for U-turns. Alternate 8: Connect to Grove Avenue. 1. Traffic volumes or. Grove north of Foothill would cause back-up which would block the new connection. 2. A street through the property at the nor�heast corner of Grove and Foothill would constrain development. 3. Such � street would have to be of a substandard design through the property. l a FL�tNHI i;t1MJiI I�0 EPORT . RE. FOtlTH ALL 8411 + CrFIC PLAN�EIR July 22, 1987f y. Page 3 Respar�sc Caf;Y and Plan Clnsuitant. r—` a `AAernate-A Bonne-t�athil'l (foul evard I. The ponditions "und?r whitlt� the progress ve movem4A s would be possible, Z!'la,'require ttiii`',use of a Of signal', which would not be possible In, the 1.4' 064446 required iii Foathi:11, or would require inappropriiX%-''*-s'Enai, tihsing. " 2. The ,4--turns available at Grave'A�renue and at San - iiernardino Road will .p rovide sufficient access to property along Foothill. 3.' The study failed to cwment on the adverse traffic impact upon the ,Ied Hill neighborhood, which would be caused by a signalised, direct connection to Foothill. Alternate 8: Connect to Grove Avenue. The high traffic volumes predicted on Grove Avenue cannot be substantiated. '(his re-routing ' of Red Hill Country Club [hive will reduce its traffic volume by 50%, thus the increase traffic introduced onto Grove -Avenue tfil be of insignificant effect on the Footthill/Grove intersection. 2. Property development often involves the teed for j significant street construction even when no € subdivision is involved. Tice impact of a street through this property is, ,"}herefor, not unlike several similar cases in the City which have or will occur. \II o l �3. A street alignment through the property is possible which minimizes impact on development and allows safe traffic service. ' 4. The study *ailed to comsment on the impact on propertylof a connection to Foothill, which would be significant in that an entire lot would have to be dedicated or purchased, ' 3'.i PLANNING COMRISSION -,sAFF REPORT- �- RE: FOOTHILL"BOULEVARO SPECIFIC PLAN £IR July 22, 1987 Page 4 i To summarize,"City staff and the ,�,ee2R consultant��tbelfeve the potential impacts of the Red Hi7 v Coraty ;,;lub Drive realignment are not significant when viewed within the total traffic and iand'use structure which exists:,in the immediate area. Further, the •; improvement in circulation for Red` Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard balance beneficially against `the level of negative impacts which might occur on Grove Avenue. Also, CalTrans commented favorably on the realignment. The issues raised by CaiTrans, as to street improvements, can be mitigated by following L'alTrans standards ft the final design of each element. IV. CONCLUSIONS: The EIR concludes that there are significant rrevers a environmental changes and these ar4 summarized in (- Section VII of the Eir These changes which will occur as a result of the project aprrov. . are as follows: 1. An incremental increase to local air pollutant emissions, and a decrease in air quality downwind of the study area. Total air ,pollutant emissions re summarized in Table IV-B/e of this document. Air pollutant emissions will be slightly higher than µ those which would result if the proposed project were nrrt approved. 2. An inLremental increase in the consumption of water, and an attendant increase in the aer.2ration of wastewater, compared to existing levels. Watet-, consumption and sewage generation (which area discussed' in section IV-K) will be hisber than levels which would ilesult if the proposed project"were not approved, although levels would'continue to increase even if the proposed specific plan were nct approved. - 1. An increase in the amount of storm water runoff produced by the project area during storms, compared to existing levels. Ultimate storm flows, will be marginally higher than levels which would result if'the proposed project were not approved. 4. An increase in local traffic vole-s compared to existing -) levels. The number of trips generv'ed within the study area will be approximately 12 percent higher than would be the case if the proposed project were not approved. Further, potential impacts of the revised circulation system can be mitigated or the improvements resulting in A overall improvement- to circulation in the corridor balance favorably against the Potential impacts. PLANNING COMMISSION ,(AFF REPORT RE: FOOTH'TLL SOU'--:YARD SPECIFIC PLAN EIR .' July,22, 1987 �i Page 5 11 f 4 5. An f,hcrease in noise levels, d�mpared to existing levels. Hoiy levels will be marginal ly'higher than if the proposed project were not approved. The EIR concludes through analysis of the alternatives that many of the potential impacts Muld acc�;r in the corridor without the enactment of the plan as a result of development under existing N� regulatory provisions. Further, the report recognizes that the Specific Plan is designed to reduce most of the anticipcted problems resulting from development in the corridor. g As a result, to comply with CEQA "requirements, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be included with the final EIR ' action. Staff recommends the following statement be providel for this purpose: "Future development proposals submitted under the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan have the potential for creating some significant environmental effects which cannot be fully mitigated. These effects, identified in the final EIR, are ` the unavoidable result" of development taking place in partially developed commercial areas of the community. However, the degree of these impacts is being mitigated to the fullest extent feasible through the measures incorporated into the EIR and the draft Specific Plan. The Foothill Boulevard Speci-Tic Plan itself is a measure to mitigate potential adverse impacts of development on the existing community which would otherwise occur without a planned and comprehensive approach. The draft Specific Plan contains provisions tailored: to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor and is meant to replace existing City-wide zoning regulations that do not address the uniago. qualities and community traits of a significant portion ofi'.tie City of Rancho Cucamonga. Consequently, the adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan will result in potential environmental effects that are substantially less significant in scope and extent than those effects whirF would otherwise occur under existing zoning regulations.' I V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission j recaiMen-d-To—the City Council the certification of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Environmental- Impact Report and Addendum by the adoption of the attached Resolution which includes a Statement ,of Overriding Considerations. S Via` ;?`w; " ...' e,Tw+a-•r £ "�s,�1,i{j+y pLANNAIC�+ s. RE F� ARlZ SPECK PLANfR Jul P Pa ast 61, ResP ull s td i City PI ner 7-- BB:AW:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Amended-EER Pages;, }a : Mi-bit "$" - Letter from City. of Upland 'ExhIbi t "V Letter from'Ca1"brans Exhibit X—, Memo from Pla►�eing Network, July 15, 1987 " Exhibit EI:lWeston Pringle and Associates Traffic Study, April 7, 1987 r; t Exhibit "F" - Letter from-bKS Associates, June 12;, 1987 Draft-Resolution r i i C fir, F RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY Off . RANCHO CUCAMONGA REWHENDING THAT THE CITY COUWI(L CERTIFY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE FOOTH ILL t" T LL BOULEVARD SPECIF IC PLAN LAN AND GENERAL PLAN. MENOMENT NO. 87-03B. A. Recitals. - (1) There has been p' dented to tbis Commission in. conjunction with this Commission's consideration' of the recommended adoption of the Foott: ll Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment No. 87-038, a final Environmental Impact Report. (ii) The final Environmental Impact Report referred to in this resolution consists of that document dated May, 1987 entitled "[craft Environmental Impact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific -T`n and General Plan Amendment No. 87-03B", written comments on that draft ri at and written responses thereto .submitted by the staff of the City ov- )Rancho Cucamonga and testimony presented during the hearings on the recomir"ended adoption of said Specific Plan insofar as that testimony pertained ;to environmental matters. Hereinafter, the above-referenced documents will b- referro to as "the final Environmental Impact Report". The entirety of th,. final Environmental Impact Report hereby is incorporated in this Resolution by this reference, (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Cii"ss of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga take the following actions with respect to the final Environmental Report: (a) Certify that the final Environmental Impact Report has been prepared on the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, California -Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq. and in accordance with the regulations promulgated thereunder. Further, that the Council certifies that it has considered the contents of the final Environmental Impact Report in considering the adoption cf the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, (b; Find that the final Environment it Impact Report does identify physical environmental impacts inherent in the project and that changes or alterations have been incorporated in the project which mitigate or avoid all significant environmental effects thereof other than a cumulative contribution to the degradation of-air .quality and noise and an incremYital increase on the local traffic circulation system; - (LHIBiiL'!� d' *WN am Foo ,.Baoc- � ,a August 26� A,t Page 2 �> 9 ` (c?. Pi that n6twilt ding till ut�g gated, adY rs environmental. i�apacts s f Fin r�agMaph Ni bov t[.xt spectfao , conoJaic � k and social consi°deg jj,lon& "ke any project atlterrl taive s e iaf(dd`in the Tina:�Environatenpal Impact Report anti-consMft-ut s an ov rr�d�n kasis for Council approval ofthe.p odecti- n (d) As to,those fmpae s, identified in the= ftn°al En i`ronmAntal Im� asi ct Report w ich cannot fhbl,.tie akolided by :fthigab-lon Oeas nes and project alternatives} adapt a, state ent of overr";dfing conxide'ratiaRs in substantial form to that set ~fiorth 'in •Exh1bit A", `attached` ler o and incorporated by,th4s. reference. :t. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26-rH DAY OF iiGUST, 1g87. PLANNING COMMISSION OF TiiE cM.. OF RANCHO C1tCAMONGA � 6Y Ilr Larry T. Mcliel,—Chainaft— ATTEST: _ Brad Buller, epu y cre Ary — ! I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planing Commission of,')e. City of Rancho Cuca nga, do hereby certify that the, foregoing Resolution 4isduly and regularly i roduced, passed, and 4dopted �Iy the Planning COMmissf I of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regth4r meeting of the Planning Comm Msion held on the 25th day of August.. 1957, by the ft ;awing vote-to-wit: 7 AYES: COMMISSIONF.t NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMF9ISSIONERS: ` Q ' i W www , OF: }!f£R.RIE mr. Co usimpt kTIIFilS The final ''Envtmomi to impact -Report idGnifiisfies certain 4 impacts wt�ch cahr�oteasis be avoi^fed by. i ,igaiion na.�utt^es.' Thosx� Impacts co psi q of �!cu t (i4e coptr.,f t&oft, to the ate a op+a of air quality and`�ois j o � With act .1Inbre0-h''ti 1Cnorease410 ,��.�tt's on the local trafffc cicrlat..on iithedgth'eseaapacts, the project shoUi tl be approved Gas ;a upon the find KAs that a is economic and social Gorsiddr,�ations °make ilrlfeaOV14 Any pr6 t alternatives spesii'i+4A i ` the, final Env xo;,WtItajr �I seat Repot and, x° accordingly cons itutes;an verrI *qg basis foe,pica ect appro al •1 Those �\ 9� considerations are ti t.the E'�othili Boulevard Specific PlAn i� f is a measure-,to mitigate potential adverse Impacts, of deveelo � n the existing community which mould Otherwise ac-cur wit-bout pqann�d and comprehensive approach to future development,. : Tile Spacif':1 plan contains provisions tailored, to the ko.thill Boulevars C''Ti r and is mi nt to replace existing City-wide, YoniMI re plat€3-ans that o not ' address the unique qua`titi,s& and coin&K-ty",'is of that portion of the City, of Rarcho Cucamonga. Consequently,`-the adopt-fon of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General plait Amendment No, 87-03B will " result in potential, environmeniall effects that are suhstantiall'y less significant in scope and extent than those effects which W,uld otherwise occur under existing zoning regulations. 4 EXH:IST'1' ".k" s PROJECT ALMMTIVES AIN F. ALTERMTIVE ROADWAY ALIMENTS This .section discusses alternative roadway alignment scenarios contained in the proposed Specific Plan for various locations within the study area. Each alternative refieecs a different solution to�various circulation system deficiencies or other probleok,which exist within the ' study area. Each alternative is expected to be Capable of solving these Problems, although each also inrlves differing secondary impacts resulting from implementation. It should be noted that it is the intent of this section to examine these alternative roadway layouts only; no recoemendatiG regarding any alternative is intended. Alternative roadway alignments for various locations within the study area are discussed below: e 1. Red Mil Realignment As discussed in theproposed Specific Plan, Red Hill Avenue f (Subarea 1) currently intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle (approximately 30 degrees), resulting in awV'-- d turning motions for vehicles entering and leaving Foothill Boule4,.d-at this location. Due to this condition, it was determined by the City that Red Hill Avenue will be realignod x-^anarios were prepared (see Figure v-Ff1 for an illustration of Red hill Avenue alternatives); K a. Rights-Angle Intersection. This alternative involves a realignment of Red Hill Avenue to provide a right-angle intersection approximately 350 feet east of the existing intersection. The portion of Red Hill Avenue which currently intersects with Foothill Boulevard would be vacated. i This alternative rauld involve the dedication to, or purchase by, { the City of one or more parcels located on Foothill Boulevards tiie proposed Red Hill alignment. Any structures on these parcels waui`d be removed. Since Red Hill Avenue would be realigned, noise levels on adjacent parcels would increase, since these sites are pre,.?ntly adjacent -only to Foothill Boulevard. This 'alternative would iAave ' realigned Red Hill Country Club Drive to intersctt.Foothill Boulevd�!d at a 90-degree angle was eliminated due to potential impacts on adjacent properties, b. Extend to &rove Rvemm. 'this alternative would involve extending Red Hill Avenue to connect with Grove Avenue. Under titis alternative, the portion of Red Hill. Avenue which currently connei;ts with Foothill Boulevard would be vacated. i ,j �t EXHIBIT "B"! C-11 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES' EXHIBIT *V Page 2 F As witir'�the southerly extension alternative, this scenario would involve the purchase or dedication or parcels along the new alignment; noise revels for parcels along the new alignment and not currently adjacent to Red Hill country Club Drive would increase, although noise levels produced by traffic on the :roadway would decrease, since ultimate traffic volumes would be decreased (see below). Since this alternative would not create an intersection with Foothill Boulevard, and would result in the elimination of the existing Red Hill Country Club Drive intersection, traffic impacts on Foothill ' Boulevard would be reduced. Accordin,- �o the City%af Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department, xist3"—!-'ffic levels.<4' Red Hill Country Club Drive (as measured in ju'ly 1g8T) are appro-zcsotely 4,000 ADT; the majority of these trips occurduring morning hours, when Red Hill Country Club Drive is used by commuter as a shortcut to westbound Foothill Boulevard. �Ince realigning Raid Hill CoF;ntry club Drive to Grove Avenue would 01iminate .its use as a shortcut, traffllc levels are projected to be reduced to approximately 2,000-2,500 ADT." If the existing alignment is retained, traffic levels would remain at etii\sting levels or drop slightly tr approximately 3,500,ADT. Grave Avenue, which t;ie City of Rancho Cucamonga intends to construct to a four-lane width between Foothill Boulevard and the intersection with Red Hill Country Club Drive, will be adequate to accommodate projected floors. The intersections of Red Hill Country Club Drive with eft-her Grove Avenue or Foothill Boulevard would be capahle of handling projected traffic volumes without signalization. It should be noted that the realignment described in this document and the proposed Specific Plan is conceptual only. The actual routing Of the roadway, including the horizontal and vertical alignment of the roadway and its intersection with Grove Avenue, as well as constraints (if any) placed on adjacent.,properties by the realignment, would be addressed at the time the ddA gn of the roadway is prepared. In addition a third realignment scenario was examined during the formation of the proposed project. This scenario would have involved realigning Red Hill to meet the existing intersection of San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard. However, it was determined that realigning Red Hill to this point would involve either substantial impacts to the Sycamore Inn,.an identified historical structure, or significant grading of the Red Hill itself, which is an identified signifir:rt landmark within the City. 'therefore, this alternative, ►rat dismissed as infeasible and was not included for consideration it the props:iir 'fan. RED► HiII�t� �" hl: AL�ERNATi / 5 � � i f Ile NOTE: STREET'ALIGNMENTS ARE CONCEPTUAL ¢NLYi. 6 C (} GTE F 01'RANC 'C7ZANONGA " a MP IT STAFFft OR, ATE: August 26 19fl,, a ;. a TO; Chairmo_and Members of the'?Ianning Commission 19� FROM: Brat Buller, City piannQr j BY: Alvan Marren, Associate planner SUBJECT: WMENTAL A8$ESSWNT AND CfllERAL PLAN AMEND14E 87-0"E - rer.,ues, Q a:�nen3"t the an use map n e n a reflect land uce changes %Vproposed by_the F. kthiJl 8oulevarC' Specific P1an as V pws. {Contir from July .22, 1987) I. Conrvrtial to Office for 8.45 acres on the ('L�theast corner of Grove Avenue and Foothill Boule . d » ApR, 207-011-43 and 44. ' l 2. Office to CommeMai for; ,(a, `�ApproximatelS� 3 acres or'ahe�-northeast corner of Red Ni11', Country Clut Drive and San Bernardino Road - APR 2O7-113-01 and 10; b. Approximately 3,5 acres on the southwest corner of Xsrlielian Avenue and San Bernardino Road - APN 207-102-03, 05, 08 �09,, 12 and 19,, c. Approximately 8 acres on the northeast corner of lnte;?state 15 and Foothill Boulevard - APN 227- 25 and 27;, and d. Approximately 5 acres on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 229- 31 -14 and 15. 3. Medium Residential to Commercial for; a. .Approximately 11 acres on the southwest corner of Turner Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - portions of APN 208-311-23 and`24. b. Approximately 7.5 acres 175 feet north of.roothill Boulevard-on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 227-201-08 and 22, and portions?of 227-201-07; and , c. Approximately 5.5 acres 50.0 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the west side ref Eest Avenue portions of AP.4 227-23-23. }� i A PLANNING COWISSION'STAFF REPORT GPA 87-03B - CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMONGA ,august 26,,2987 i Page,.? AMIL 4. Low Residential;" to Commercial for approximately 9 acres 300 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the east r side of Turner Avenue XM 1077-601-08 and 10, and portions df 1077,51-'2 and C', 5, Industrial Park to Couwarcia't for approximaf 37 acres on the southwest`corner of Etiwanda Avenue and i Foothill Boulevard APM 229-031-03 through 13 and 20., 6, To adJust the 'line between Medium 'Residential Commercial in:`" the block bordered by Foothill- Boulevard, San Bernardino R.lad, Hellman Avenue and Klasman Avenue (see c6hibit "A" of the Resolution). Division line as shown is approximate. Precise location of land use divisions to be determined through the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. I. BACKGROUND: The land use changes listed in this item are actions r ' necessitated by,-the anticipi�. d enactment,nf the Foothill Boulevard Specific' Plan (refer to Exht it "A" of the Resolution). - The �. General P':an Amendment will change land usA designations for those ` properties along Foothill Boulevard proposed for change by the Draft Specific Plan'. The General Plan mu�t`be amended before final approval of the Specific Plan by the City cil. II. DISCUSSION: The Environmental Assessment,;of the General Pi an 7m{"MUHY-is tied closely to the Environmental R^view of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Foir that reasons it has been _ determined that an expanded Environ�fital Impact Report, includiF the General Plan issues, is required. The EIR review period wfrl end on August 18, 1987 and at the August 26, 1987 meeting, the Planning Commission may act on both the EIR and General Plan, Amendment. III. RECOMMENDED ACTION: If the Planning ComA ssion rrcoWr_nds ' cer ca on o e 'Foothill Boulevard`,Specific Plan anQ;General Plan S7413B EIR, t is recormended that General Plan Amendment 87- 038 be aaproved through adoption;-^f the attached Resolution, ACiti /�� t+ed, nnex � BB:AW:i e AttachW,nts: Resolution of Approval EW;'fi t "A" RES."Lri ION NO. J A RESOLUTION OFc-AT E PLANNING COMMISSION OF Tl� CITYt,OF_ , - RANCHO !}IiCA�10 GA CAL,IFORNfA, RI COtialEN}INC AA ROItAL OF &'ENERAt. $L,4N 5t6M +fTt10. $7-t338, AfNiriN6a'�tE LAND USE ELDENT OF" THE RANCHO COCAMONA GieNERAL PLAN' �t Y a• W'EREAS, the Planning Cowission has heed a duly advertised puVic hearing to conside? all conwants,on tte proposed General Flan Amendment tjo, 87-038. ;'/ SECTION 1. ~ The Rancho Cucak nga Planning Commission hereby makes Me),70110W ng in fpgs. A, The Amendment does not conflict with .the Land Use Policies of thi/General P'l.a►t. The Amendment nt promotes goals of the Land Usedement. C. Ae Amendment would not ^be materially in Iii4ous or detrimental to the adjacent properties. r SECTION 2. The General Flan Land -Use map shall be amended as- t follows: 1. Commercial to Office for:P 15 acres on the northeast corner of Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 207-011-43 and 44. 2. Office to Commercial for; a. Approximately 3 acres on the northeasfi_, corner of Red Hill .6untry Club pride and San Bernardino Road - APN 207-113-07 and 10; b. Approximately 3.5 acres on the southwest corner of Car¢rl{,�n Avenue and San Bernardino Road - APN 207-10?-03, 05, 08, 09, 12 and 19; c. Approximately 8 acres on the northeast corner of interstate 15 and Foothill Boulevard APN 227-211-24, 25 and 27 and -1. Approximately �:5 acres on the southeast corner of ttiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APR 229-311-14"and 15. I 3. Medium. Residential to Commercial for. a. Approximately 11 acres on the southe'est corner of Turner Avenue and Foothill Boulevard poKions of APN 208-311--23 and r' 24. = err ` PL�O!l11ii0�C�t�F9Mc�S5I0 RESO4UTI,0p NO. 7 GPA 8,T60 C 1° OF R NGKO CUCAMONGA :> August 26, 1987 Page 2 ��1 b. ApproximaterTz,-1 7.8 acres 176 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of Etiwande Avenue - APH 227-201-08 and 22, and portions of 22.7-201-07; and c.. Approximately 9.5 acres $00 feet north of J Foothill Boulevard on `he crest side of East Avenue - portions of APH 227-23-231L 4. Low Residential to Commercial t'ir approximately 9 acres 300 feet north of Foothii Boulevard or, the east sine of Turner Avenue - Arrl 10.77-601-08 and 10, and portions of 1077-601-ae and 04. .. 5. Indus:riai "Park t Commercial fow approximately 37 acres on the southwest''corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APH -,229-031-03 thro4i' 13 and 20. 6. To adjust the line betweeiz Medium Residential and Commercial in the block bordered by Foothill" Boulevard, San Bernardino Road, Hellman AvenuL- and Klusman Avenue (see attached Exhibit"A"). Division line as shown is approximate. Precise loeav on of land use divisions to be determined through- the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. SECTION 3s A Negative Declaration is hereby recommended for adoption by the City Council .-for this General Plan Amendment, based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. NOW, WEREFORE,.BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Plaening Comission does hereby recommend approval of General plan Amendment No. 87-03B to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOF. 0 THIS 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RA.NUO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry-T.-McNiei, thalrman ATTEST: ra u e-, epu y 5acretary ) NGA �I I, Brad Bu1ieY, Q y Seeret r of the }�imnfAg Comission of the City of r Rancho Cuaswgs� etey certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly intro user assed, and adopted by the, €�lannfnj C is�ion of the City of Rancho Circa" n a; at A regular Weting;.or'the OlaniiiRng ;oWssion held �n the 26tt�'dby of`�jiist 1'9$7, by the following vote-to=wit.: AYES: CY WIISSX'Ut MS NOES: C(P4'X,551o&St ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: � I� r a C.. GROVE.AVE. Ic BAKER AVE. r 1� o VINEYARD AV�.�: lz o HELLMAN AVE. C� ARCHIBALD AVE. aN �o I a Y RISER AVE. v s m .a tid ul HAVEN AVE, o L 1 ' p o r, a -aI C,cl ii O 7 ETIWANDA AVE. Ic�-. a' i r its { m CITY OF RANCH16GUGAMONGA Gvc„ nro — STAFF RkPOR kcy� DATE:'`\, August 26, 19871977 r, y TO: Chairman and Hvmbers of;the Planning Commjxsion FROM: Brad ®uller, City Planner BY: D,bra Meier, Assistant Plav-,qer SUBJECT: 631VIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13271 - LEWIS e total eve opmen of a_rest en a su ffv'Tis�n of_M.fi acres within the Medium (4-14 dwelling units per acre) Land Use Designation 4f the Terra Vista Planned Community into 128 townhouse-condominium.un?ts on a single -' parcel located at the northwest cornt-* of Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avenue - APN: ;1077-091-29. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the subdivision map, conceptual p o p an, conceptual grading plan, conceptual landscape plan, and; building elevations for the development of 128 townhouse Style units, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. r B. Project Density: 14.8 dwelling units per acre C. Surroundin Land Use and Zoning: Norm- ProposedC y Pit a—ram South - Existing 'Vineyard; Planned as townhouse style project within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned. Community East - Existing vineyards; Pinned as Office Park (OP) on the west side of Milliken and a Neighborhood Center (NC) on the east side of Milliken both within the Terra Vista Planned Community West - Existing single family residential within the Low Medium District 14-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista. Planned Community V. General Plar, Designations: Prf ac e - ow- a Ium Resident4al (4-8 dwelling units/acre) Noith - Future City park Sad b. - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Ease ;i - Neighborhood Commercial We_acd - 'Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per,-icre) ITEM 'E PLANNING COMFYSSPON STAFF REPORT TT M71 - Lewis,Vomes, ` l' August 26, 1987 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics The site is bordered to the north partially oy Base the Road; tC to east partially by Milliken 'I Avenue; to the south by TerraVista, Parkway; and to the:west by Belpine Place. The site slopes from north to south at approximately a 34% grade. No structures or significant r vegetatio_'i exists on the site. F.,:= Parking Calculations Total Units: 125 Unit Mix: 2 bedroom:- 81 3 bedr�..W- 47 Parkino�Required ;8 x 81 = 146 2.0 x.47 = 94 0.25 x 128 a 32 Total = 272 sptces'required Parking Provided: enclosed - 128 �J open - 138 Total = 266.spaces provided The present site plan design is deficient 6 open parking spaces and must be amended to include the required 272 spaces. The correct number of parking-spaces shall be shown on Detailed ` Site Plan prior to issuance of grading permits. ANALYSIS: A. General: This tract is within a portion of the Ter:?1 Vista Plan designated Medium Density Residential (4-14 dwelling units per acre). Although the proposed Bract densit is 14.8 dwelling units per acre, the flexibility built into the Terra Vista Plan allows re-designation between adjacent density categories through_,the Deign Review process, as in this case from Medium to Medium-Nfgh. The site is designed in a townhouse fashion yet is being processed as a condominium project. The project is designed with a meandering interior driveway and appropriate landscaping with a defined''pedestrian way un one side. On-site amenities are distributed between two Y J primary open space areas. The larger of the two containing the pool/spa and recreation building and the smaller area containing a spa with a shade structure and barbecue facilities. As is characteristic of a townhouse design .each unit has a private rear yard area and an attached one car " garage. Additional open parking is provided in bays throughout AdIlL the project. Three unit types are provided, two 2-bedroom and one 3-bedroom design, clustered in buildings ofA-6 units each. PLANNING COWISSTON STAFF REPORT TT 13271- Lewis Homes n August 2.6, 1987 Page 3 B. Design Review Committee: In a report to,the Committee (McBi'e1, G Barker, o eman on August 21, 1986, staff identified basic concerns about the design of the project in terms of the overall site plan design. 'he following staff comments briefly describe the issues at that time: R 1. Transition of density between this project and Tract 12670 to the west. 2. Variation of�bOlding setback along street frontages. 3. Straight, uninterrupted drive aisles that allow views through the entire site. 4. Repetitive building separation that is not conducive to an intere':ting streetscape. 5. Building orientation designe�ii,in a grid pattern. 6. Consideration of designs treatment along the Special Boulevards -- Base U ne Road and Milliken Avenue. 7. extensive use of retaining walls was present throughout the project. 8. Provision of landscaping that created a street-like appearance rather than that of an alley. Ac a result of those comments the project was completely re- designed, including use of, a new architectural product, and considered by the`Committeeagain on August S, 1987. At that meeting, the Committee (Emerick, Buller, Coleman) agreed that all previous. concerns had been adequately addressed and recommended approval of the project based on the following comment -- As a condition to this project, the applicant agreed with the Committee that sidewalks, parkway landscaping and the Terra Vista monumentation at the corner of Milliken and rise Line should be constructed along with Tract 13271 (see Exh` C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project-, and determineda with e following special conditions and recommended standard Conditions of Approval the project is consistent with all ;applicable Standards and Ordinances. The developer will be required to construct full-wtdth street improvements' along Milliken Avenue between Base Line Road and Foothill B ulevard and along Terra Vista Parkway between Spruce Avenue and�,� Milliken Avenue.__. The developer will also be contributing an in-lieu fee 'tor the future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities on the north side of Base Line Road. �^F*an'sE t" } , ,.`. "'+,['t ,�. ,�'•' ^ice 11 * } RL_ANNNC�,Gtti�iiS� �i` REPORT 7'i` i'32r` Letir�� ones.. August6�,� � Page . t , D. E v7ro eC As a s►rteht: Part i of the Initial study bias been I c TO y° app T an't. Staff has completed Part iY of the En leobajkeftw1`CKeckIfst`a°nd found no significant:iampacts on the en�t ^diiment a a resent of the proj"kct. III. FACTS FOR FIND. NGS-t This pr i5 consistent with the Terra s Planned, o zni-ty and tie �e �l "Plan: and will ;not be detrimental to a aoent .,properties, �r 'cause significant adverse impacts. The p �oseci;: 6uiing design and' subdivision, together ,nth all, ��econm+emdt+d�Con dons of Approval, are its compliance wit17,a f'1'hab 4 regulations of the Developeent Cade and the Terra' Vista Cni ty,Plan.;„ IV. COMES This item has been advertised as a public the*,tA g in e a y eport newspaper, the property posted,, and not,�ces were sent o a propr:riy owners within 300 feet of the proaect site. V. RECOMENDATION: Staff reco*mends that the Planning Commission approve endive Tract 13271, subject to the Conditions of Approval through adoption--pf the attached Resolutio and ,issuance of a Negative Declaration.113 Res uily Bra B He tied, � City lanner BB:DM:vc Attachments: Exhibit °A" - Terra Vista Master Plan Exhibit "B" Site Utilization/Area Development Exhibit "C" Subdivision tdaap Exhibit "D" - Preliminary Grading Exhibit '`E" -• site Plan Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" - Front Elevations (Mustrative) Front Elevations (Typical) Exhibit "H" Side Elevations Exhibit"I''- Rear Elevations Exhibit "J" - Typical:.Patio Cover Exhibit "K" - Walt/Fence Details Resolution of Approval with Conditions; ej s 5 � !C. RAL PAR )''M1� :�• Ar ',ei'•�i� \��� .'._.`" ,, r _.... _ ..se u..�a _•,.- .; Mie u_He M.�a CAFOitlN n""' '" °P i+�.�sc�4 rARlcxinaY 70 OW" j. '�' ,� ,.•�?,, CoesilcKiAl, w�.w.oe u►+u ^•� �CA y � , APT ~hY� ILK=. ,ilRAlimRvtgyDP• nucr.awe R''RR y •1 - �' •„�«f IN aerss _ 1 ' P"m t a �4 µns i 0= ,1 C sm �.«•r,. ,se., P .RReICR '" ,^ >� { . �... � .`r ' .•� ly .'�twr- ism at gxF�t;, �..� ta�'�:•. Fvi Y ,''T�*sr�re�r ti 1�4Y�6 R ,•1•. ��� i���f"" '�"IL L \ RjS+�e1RA en e,.r► t, * CEaow 4A�!t a tf ,,..e Pro ft 1L ftAldR z Hmsritx iiw T wPe,� xrwYea��i t NUN, 3 ..j..r••-• !fit OtW14tt .• 1AY74Y APAR'LYtR7 -�-a a. S1•s-�...:_ � s5 S r aavc • 'F,'� J {Tt 3xy� 4 OFFMI PARK ,aul w tt •ems I t,�t � fit"YY a: .l •. i' AOeESA1JRAMfiI 7 r rr.� .t y AY OtRCiAL\� s I ],H CITY' OF ITEM:027.E RAINCM CUCAMON TITLE:' ,,EE k{ u PLANNING EXV3 7ON EXHIBIT:_ SCA- 1, - ,99 � i I I as. _. yrj K� 1t t11 1 i .-t �" •.... << .fig It � `..w �\� `1�r! ,r``` �� �� �� " '�� ����� �,+`'.. •f F ,� �� l�w`�� � � f��'� �� �s Lens � s }}1 r f .i.....1+..a...� � .� ter., '„• .�.,.�,r �' 1J�•'j1� � ._ lot jIz` x } .t` .�. \.:f ,Y l !T•..:yam — t ` e "�'f �n IN TENTATIVE TRACT INO. 13271 i ^ i ro:eaxuaxmtuK roNraaaa .N 7N!CMV Of NAxCev-c Z UMOx9A ,. COW"OI*Am VW—ANdtxO tiTASE MF CAUVORNtA row 9997 t IMIM") 9.94 ACpt Ism oxtrs s for NKDRTH CITY OF ITEIM: I''. MNNIING MAN EXHIBIT: SCALD r TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15271at Tot ctw of M&MCV4""now" - cmxv•of CAM ttttAtoloO reAft Or CAulOtnlA o.Aa Moro f&W fro VMS AAlt ffof UMroorOl _ !Ot COosoMlrloM raAfraNtt 7E tA4t { not _ _ - -y 'SOA* �A-i..,.- -Yr ��.. afA/�r +\ ,t��� i 'y'Y- 1 17�At..� { ! �• .N� 5 ; �+I orriSa PAY S , p 1 t!•� OPVMVO ` i ! _ 'c { 1 :�.f u►a� ! w u+1+«{ui �r,j..N r na t N i h r.au • '' I � f PAR"AV i -'� 9'Y�,natA, +{T.r' •�, }(.i ,., '»t!Vf `fir •l 4 go. f +;j Si a�� t'• �� A S VACANT xx We "la r hdf A frttra amine V� �AJRTH CITY OF : ; . M RA►'� CUCAMON TTFi E: Larfi PLANNING DEISM EXHIBIT.�__ SCALE- ,775 '" 77, "i r r I � y1f ! `N, i t ONE 1RRRI s .) i= 1• , "a CORSiOwma INIalOs" TENT"IVE TRACT NO. 132'11 ot- X&CITY at RAMI"CPCAKOROA COORTY OF>tAM aSfiil mwo STAIR OF 4ALWORx1A +vxa Lrn til.sxatV -a,.iAtau lRILRLTa L to-t NX" CITY C�l PLANNI.'''VG rDIVi +t EXHWlr-- SCALE Elb ------ ---- $ASK LINK NOJ.D } d -!n`:r� 1 i x a:- rig 'Y+ �^ ..��—"ter•.. � i ii:l t t 3 CITY OF r IT� PLAINNING MrSION 'EXHIBIT; SCALD I BELPIM PUNCE 1 rrnicAt SECTION !I sac l fit' t4 ulfam AVZMM rLx t T.Q., V='T% PAAX.WAV scTeON -� IMH u_ f cr, RANCHO 41TL&,- PI.A 1II�3G ) ! :.,' EXHII��-_P_:z rAI.Er �' NAlt LINE xo.w i� P LFvti k` NUR _• I4� roy tfFP1CZ �11K _ �N W � . .y 1 a JFa •��.. �� �-� I I' _ �./ •'e�e ei• s" a � e '� Vie. a �,t. _.. A a L l an c e o • e�. a. q. i T1f CITY OF try t YE 1327L Afan FLA.' NI r x IIPVI.SK)NI EXHIBIT- SCALE- r t YR 13 D - r ' I r 3 G B D I a A r g 113 G D _ Nt�TH i CITY OF rrEm. R.,kNCHO CLLkMONGATx1ZEi �,dT� ! '1 PI:AMM DIMS* EX itr s� ALI A, ik Vol- a 1{. v ti � ,} •�ii �'Lh rt � r� �•e,s a SU� � )� ,i`i1 of `� �� •; x a'���'� .r c`. � � �• )ram r,„ r _��t� , t U e t.,. �� ri. "�',�rl�,f � r'.. '�' ,�"'3..-_ e_,.rt_,.�• � "sYi. .r�,v__'' y. rr ka 19 +p•' a��-+I►`. :(J ,.t c �1 i.,,, .� . .s r ;C 4t.1 `-- ;F.....r. �j 6 NMH CITY OF -A NAI'r ING DfV'I EXHIBIT. SCALE- �J --- - �. -- ane■tiooeasw a,ow Rw Me NTH CITY O ITEM- RANCM €.;LUA NC P"LA,MIND E iV SKYJ EXHINT. �SCALF / i r i 1 r, . r a mr a -21 ♦ . I f - �" '� �. .i•_ r�'�A �� aia fit"��w 1 f �'- OXSTf�t011 SLLTTfUAU{ � 4+'�^�r'� !{t MpLft MlAO'M MOOT In4c tOMCMTt 111� LAN �I �JItTi-> `sr�;t1`.t�'hri-•�-z�.{t' 3 _ 3 _ -!R z32 - s------7's�C4� � •s.=-_-i� - � e C B C E iD i' i 1 . -, .. � �..a �� • vim+, �r ,� � �, � �, 4. i �w �L'� ��'`��_ µ�: ; o-Fes..♦ s+. � K I Q F ■ h. 1 _4 _ 7• V. -fit � G _.., -., /iL:�LG P�tO[//.d�,G' ,lillf.7,�i' �'1/rd✓G�Gr�,.�i,9ri1..�.�.�G��� NORTH CITTY CF rrEM:JC Pi.Ale'ND3G m,isKN EXHIEU. J- �- SCAU, y � ctow oo .au A Per kIlItA TO SOT IHONIMOL ' Q ` �; 1 ' " fit-M—AdNNM DIVIRQN EXHUIT= .L—SCALE_ lip, MON sumb �4WWW Cap CITY CF rrEM. •iu M V% DI VS"S" _ Y7/i�j a $j,ss• , rah RFSOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY Off' RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 13271, LOCATEf"AT THE NORTHWEST CORNFR OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT APN; 1077-091-29 _ A. Recitals. Lewis Homes has-,filed an application for the appra!al of Tentative Tract Map No. 13271 as�'described in the title of this ,;esalution, , Hereinafter ;:1 this Resolution, the subject Tentative Traci Map referred to "the application". (ii) On the 26th of August, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamaga conducted a duly noticed public neaF ng on the .application and concluded said hearing or, that date. (iii) Asi legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Re"iOution have occurred. B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found,:determined ano'Iresoived/lby the anning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucai bnga a.; follows; 1.. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth 'in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution are trua and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence present�,.-d to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 26, 1987,1 including written and oral staff reports, together 0 th public tze iy, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follow4 4a) IrAt application: applies to property located at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway with a street frontage of 533 feet and lot depth of 899 feet and is presOntly vacant; and* . (b) The property to the south and°_West . is zoned for resid Ttial uses and is a developed trfth single family r ,idences and is vacan".., 'respectively. The property to the north is zoned for park uses and is vacant. The property to the east is zoned for office par';; and neighborhood coW&ci,;1- uses and is vacant, 3• 8aad�+ upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific fin ins of fads set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby fends and concludes as follows; 1, i d PLANNING COMISSM9,AESOLUTION NO. 1T 13271 - Lewis Homes August 26,'XS87 (a) . That tentative tract is consistent with 'the' General rIlan Deval } pni'ent Code, and specific pions; and or design (b) The r 9 imp a."e2is of the tentative � tract is odnsristent with the 6Pner3l Plan, Development Cote, and specific plans; and {e) The site is not ohysically suitable for the., type of development prop;)sed; and-, (d) The design of the subdivision is :tot likely to ` cause substantial enviromwtal damage an4-,- avoidhble Injury to humans and wildlife ar" thew habitat; and f (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) Tie, design of the tentative tract wia not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access , s through or use of the property within the f pr'opose4_4lubdivision. 4. This CoA ssion hereby finds and certifies that toe projecv has i been reviewed and considered in compliance w);Ch,:4e Califor11a Tnvirunmental Quality Act of 1970 and,, further, this Comf is',on-hereby issmv-a Negative DAclaratien. , S. Based, '?n the findings and conclusions set -forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, t '; Commission hereby approve] thi appiicati'an subject to each and every condition netforth i?elow and in the attached Stan and Conditions attached hereto a;ud incorporated i�erein by this reference. (a) P1anfing Division: i. Qfk'�l :ive, texturized puvement "shall be provided at`'all =y -tray entrances and pedestrian crossings at driv,4w3y7. Final details and locations-.shall be included on the landscape and irrigation pians,r:=subjei,* tri review 4"3 approval by the Planning Division. ii, Aat` trash Wctosures shall be pr:w�ic(ed with overher; lattice -.York oe, similar shaded structure�,, ta `thee sstisfae• 4n of the City Plinner. ; ,> ConstrugVini details of the recreation buildipg and/or all shade ,tructures skull _:�e ineit,t;ad in the\'zonstruction 4 drswi gs, sublact to tree review, and approval of the PQ .ng Divis on. A71 retaining wk3is sha31 be decoratively treate r� to re.lew and approval by the PI-Inning Division. kµ r� �., PLANNING COMMI-WS 04,OSI OE:UTION NO. TT`13271 - 42WJ•s ►io e- August 26, I987 , Page 3 V. Final design details of the perimeter walls/fences shall ` be included as part of the landscape/irrigation plans, .subject_to the review and approval of the Planning Divisiok vi. Low level lighting shall be provided in all open space areas. Design details sh-ill be included on the detail y lighting plait subject to review and approval of both the Planning:Division and the Sheriff's Department, prior to ` ther�i�,3uance of building permits. " vii:;,'All outdoor mail box locations shall be provided with a solid overhead structure and appropriate 'ighting. The final design of any free standing structure shall be compatible with the building architecture and shalt be ` included in the construction drawings, subject to the ` review and approval of the Planning Division. [, viii. A fence enclosed tot lot with active play equipment shall be provided. Location and design details shall be included in the landscape/irrigation Mans, subject to the review ,and approval—of the Planning Division. ix. An acoustic study, �r:all be submitted in reference to Milliken Avenue anii Base Line Road and all mitigation measures complief-O th to the satisfaction of the City Planner prior to ,Asuancti of building permits. X. The correct number« a peeing spaces shall be shown on the 04tailed Site Platt _N+r?or ti issuance of grading permits. xi. All rear and side elevations that are adjacent to _ ptrimeter streets shall receive enriched molding details and window mullions. xii. Street improvements, parkway 1pndscaping and Terra Vista•, Monumentation at the southwesticorner and along the entire street frontage of the Offie4 Park parcel at Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue shall be constructed with Tract 13271 and be completed prior to final occupancy of said Tract. (b) Engineering Division: i. The following streets. shall be constricted full width for the stated limits streets, that off-site sidewalks and parkway lan0scaping may be deferred until development of the adjacent property; a. Miliikek .avenue from Base 'Line' Road to Footnill Saul evard'and c PLANNING,Comm O M7 -V 54.01ION NO TT 1 • is is ;des IIUgtJS 2fi, 190 Page 4 b. Terra Vista parkway from Spj^uce Avenue to MI11iken a `r =' Mepue, e 740 for portion alreadS! improved. y . 1 , An in .t`i,ett fee as contribution tot he future I, underjaroundina of the k, tMAl twerhead Alt'litsy aV (com Mt,% i•o;s and. el ec rival, ��'h' 'ei , far ate '66KV elee!srioad} an tree :opposite si{de ofl�.s'tl.ine Hoad sfral 1 he oai`d tot die City prior toy the. mppr"o�a1 a€ the final ;map. The fee sh.011 be one ilal f the City adopted unit amount tines tre length of'the°OMJect frontage, iii. A i nift �f so` from the curb to the first park°ing space perperrdicu�arr`to the drivewalf on Terra Vista Parkway shall { _ be provfde�!, la 6. The Deputy Secrotary to this Commission shall certify to the � adoption of this Resolution, -r 5 $, AP ittIYED`AND AOOPT''s0 JiHIS 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1967. jJ PLANNING 'CowISS�16M,'OF THE CIT`' OF RANCHO CYCAMONGA r BY: Tiirry a, ATTEST: Brad a erg,,, uepufy ere ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretory of the Punning Commission of the City of,,, Rancho Cucamtonga,. d�khereby C 'Afy that the foregoing Resolution Was duly and regularly intrsdtdCeLi' passed, Isnd adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Caicaimonga, at a regular meeting of the planning Commission-held on the 26th day 4f August, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COWISSIONERS NOES: COMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ✓�b `31i i.y '��( A. S i Y 1t �t L40• NWO+•�L p,1�iQ r' Ty�' Yyy yYry -0.Nu �1 Jt yy.� Nrc.f44 "r3wr3:J �.�yyo.� 4 iQQQ 4 L R. Q t Y G Y Y p i nLQ }^QiRF 6� q2Y qy� R d� � 9C"C y;ieyr�'n.�'•q wiA1,.. is�i��C ��?'��y �C��q�` Np� y.4,YJy� 7 �" Rw�w�}i avy p p�,�.r�. sSYvs ,��..G toW iLa Y.�� �L•L d� .+� .. a� .5 a� 9�n f e'!-'�uEq�u tl�N Q y ten a3 € " Q aIs eSn'a�a `}S 'V �- y equc �Ut���{6 nt.ysY _W VL 60 _Yqy V.�tl.N® p V�f�aab'rCi"' � �tf.ug,`i$ e.�r$djj�['. '�a4y� -'� Sze. cst$►. ., GL:'a 'C Y ��my {Y1 YV VGGti` AM eKysF,y+}i aryum + ur jN i MY r..G-Vy2.L G$.YLm�. YNCN�� p^�{P, CAA$ ~ y�r�Yf L6 1lNVp tl a}A�tl1.� yw Y■� Z1�r N�tT`C C EQ�eS Nyl y^Q�ii �dd f.2G! v &nn YCr�¢ ,11. > µma NN Lt c4Ai. patl 4��N 'I^tl0?r QR:B CYg���i. N� "Wy �L��V� � MI.MtC�7a YG N�GAy dui„ Q O ,u rwy wW �_ ip�..� wp' ` gyp �+a��f�C�$II4�..S ww N� as �sPY�V, rm s rY6 �O� tl IC'Y L L Y 5 N y C n R A !• tl I•r S Y 1 mf dq M', L ti N a��ex E. a5 :e«"N. :4i r`' a �s$r n�a «aNuv � GY644.0�.G Vij tq� �N mLm ,p W t Q4• Q�. C V �'n G�1N 1y N C ON "I* CAT v6i « =ay48 u ¢ 3 .. F N •� gMaYi y�{ G L wNi � �" �Q ���.y6Qw a�4'. ' o"'i 1hi V v ! W aCcL V 4 is ((.�• V yY CyNI,Z=yo of b �� �s ,■ S^O CipOy�OYC Y�C qqL"YJii aoN C -1 mu o 4{{ ,rd•�-Ad+ �v S ppi �jN6yij ApLy« .Y.°iY Oqt 6ws D.H Ya3N m��L `Vr Y� iNYL MW tl i tl� � ypQ c N"` yyyH��� o�° o u a'�.o r o{■Gq�"y„N C x M,w` .'ri..�`4'pN o 0 qq 1p�o_. y,owY�q s�$Y""'y�y�'� h• 2.9 �ar �4CY 5X NLOt SCv r,w �a1 ��r y =QQO �^ W e�.O� ; aj� L.�{b'ly �1p�L� Hr..•.�M'tyiiyNo y p�7c. a fr•S(S 6 t N ' ~yQ .p`O,:rO�r®y�� V i�4j i^I n' Y tl tl�MM ®/yN�.x. 4«11 Ve W G yyLN qy N p Y■4 Y N.L'.'• V y YY'L ��i f Ye C Q« .CON 7Y 0 Ci s (.. qq •i • Y3 O nN 'y c C F � + ` Yrtl g�� yG� �p t Y :gn� y�-•p� CQ4 N— _ ` �.•, +Ys�i+� a ���ttNpp Y�•itlw�� r.a°J �,. ttL �a��'a W q $y aw '+ ''ir,yG y�{Af� �� _,�.•$tr�u G^ 0. �� d+Y a�N. �3. rypc G'q ` - • tl�r�� psi C OYCp ka CRC V•Vll�.^�6`))II G:a Y�l^Li 1sgq111F • tdi{�Y.N C— .•I71.WNP"C(,� Nw. O VF BUS G6d'p^ yN� ^�NwM la 0. gg 1- �e� ,�. �a7i NOW3 g2sw GJ1Y`s�, '��a'a�� 1O, 1yX _ se�Y4y��� caY►���g �y1�Cp �v4pr� ag� E■. 4 OCNSl din �If NNs• �NYW M i1b NN Is rL iY r^�.Y Gt a'S.L 1Y a�� SM G Ai Yf 1 p6�C CC n Yo +W+�^^u ` �i«./C •Qy� +'� ^ <GV 41 4 f4 a_yJ.y�w'Sidd o'p4. - X IS Up it `O Gr« « gM OM Yam\ LwY L� �+N i- ;- M� NU. {. Cr ^q at �ty s K .9,�'4 a•^^ icy. .^9yN Lp�# �'^.p. i� Y ^G•J,V .G O W 9m= YpI Y 5 6)o N Y N li "�o 1C YL gYG�s I's 1:aCCV N CY Ng� NC �.l� + ^ N g .: o�� �tT� =Y'� "pn� 'u- qv}1'9 N R p ia q Y ii A G 0 t�t��1�' lY L 7 fyCy O�L} M y�,OI Y Ye l yw� � ur6M� `•! L Y �a �c.L'.a c s.�`6 yi Yy V NO�B�pe L'yq C. CO�yea ' �.p� GO�. Y� Cu W�ni+P .q R�gCi Y C�O.GC «_'Y \J L'➢^ -1: 41RRRSS. eC MY :W�a„ LACC Cs C =w C G Y^v S L® w G i d N �-aog 0W $roa A n M "Cc $+a vC 3it0 ��'ytlB GNACL g 23 .+1ca~8y"N' zewNor � ��P$ o u v¢� w`: � ypNMY �Lr O .I p�p 6 r•" a�V NO YY�.Y�^Y ytlp L +�L Clw.V«N 4 W •{j� P. 'OCy,A YNw wYy. *Hill 6 {1.G rN L +a V yG MY .LY V5YdY,C1 ,6 QY6y J�94d 1� wv<M X "" U fT V Z { 4Y�LY�1� w�+)� W ^M1�M1•. q� �0��6®�YC�i Gy4 wz^ i �` 2 wF �� ._wyCoYtfl °fioL� L NC U^"O,w V N:N Cb !p0.Y« {� v W: NAM L 1 N+ . ^EZ (X' �yYp eYC ai btYy W `NNVfI�q S�4. yl CC qW�� ^Of..ls N6 C! R C t9 tVrlw .N NO.L.LA7 �iC9 �1tq VWnN� NaK �CC pL iW 1�11�Q"��Ly�a`2 +Cn9V1; Cq i! qpy�.Y■.WC Y�'•�l' YOIQ �C.z6QN ^VY aNi tYtp Mbr °i O L$M yy N C+ r O�.4��^�N O fib f]I OI t�p _aC W at C VyO YO NYY Li O yB �ACNG . 9 ll�agpy. yy y( Y L^ t{ �•t«ram g yy �gWlK Yb L1 ti y�N Z. [I ba�NWNygg41 ��r■yq. Nyy CNY.L WLW ytyVj� V 1 y���♦FF v.YO KY WN pLf Otl.G. NA Cv^'.'i 4i i VI. :p +V C V \7��p.`�1 M�� O` ^fµ`a CNes-g1 1._C14 CW M s Vi f~iNr�l •�i�ff~O `,Y•Ie L CLC XW% sgpll.�p`1 :�VC3 Y n4a��f^ 9^[4� Ow A'n •V gyp%,�b BLV Wv�N QL �yG1i OMB '_. siVti!gYM. y�W YN _�Nt\� ypR Nam^ Op+p`{{�I{L{��b Yaass° qVTL yyt 0= y� E iwW.a� cw�l. f:,. ``� Yuy NQNcO VI OIC WI��Qqq¢�. i Nss ICE a Mwn.K i. {Aw AN X-z KN5.2N tlilb \\Vi o0 iYw Vm !Y � CpN 1 f� 1. wauC cfC ea Get y i�Yp�y�.. °.-3� «3'. N� ..ovl� N Yua'L� c� wyN N2+N OQ 'i 6 L N`�r[� 6 p pa3 w y N Z M� Y� tnil {p! Y�6��G yVii CL N V sf'. C C M^ .0 O Y tad p�II M� O C s .., K N y 3 '>�o la 's �fi•l'. " �t� Ne $ a yta•}s N�•gCo OR v i'> G a-.w Y a+ w� as afry wta opyC �o�C W.`. LM1l g4 a.ft oYaY �Ew QW �� .rt5 �y �tl�"o4+ ri`+ NN y.pe eN Y �w VAr^ bpwy act «Mb GtlEV^ +^ «g- .e� OYO`O Y.® 'all I^ltOLy y y Vy N�r' C A 2, OOiOlIa�ry�f V pN stV' N��J Oq �4w.wN. ^� CL�114 vw40w ci C,G M• ClIL{IO Cb:Q pY� �C C i 7 M «L ti' � � i W b � G yl b�i� N Y '�d N iB l•��� Leq�y sl "' ,�ovr u ^N g� w «$ gar+� me o YV CN:a +.C Vy �yl.yam. 6yfyq` Y yN=V L y °I� ^.n YSI w'O tY^.4 yC SNbr YQae.VaA.�4 i. CCCOC Y C .aC�C w ey;y�I-0 uQ � �ii i NVIy V tl. L>b CL°L yIy C a C C. W VA OCM^ W■V�. YN r6M Q MN^fi V w.'^L'i C VVw.`p LV q a ^G +~id4 meet C V L CC 3Cr A pVCLam L 6 Ar.f 9KO N HG.N iV Cv i-ON+4G KN� W0...6W Na0ii` V C f J s Rio i 3 oc� =J ocu�� Li M of�f A e�� �C;/t� j�.:_ �Y✓ l �a> M� tL�uC! Yy~y V dN Vs N w S tSi Lam'm'" o .••^Y' W � V ��CpeLLayiiYQ•$p�{ VG 'yy�•� ^0 � � F1YY.� wN @ -�W L'+d .cCC M }. «� t+q ww rdP o YYpp "' yyL O_p±V,�'. ✓7. µ.� p �T 1.9 o v m Ni `Cy✓N�� rYt CYC^' S �YV yW Ya �aV O �®— CvYO'. . 96 �3A.w, d!'i ppa'^Y,� ��tl �. Y,,1CC�•y 1«+ ��}Oop a.$'� �✓�✓C� r ~C �� tiL M4 V N is e•4C.Y. C`Bw a�✓ '^' 7.-` t? zyY9 M` an. �OYpC y��� ti NmqYY�F. C✓�I� ®�'Y Y 4tl 8qC�. .�Y2]� o✓6+ YL y.TfiM ✓ ~ aV L G •06, dAtl{ C Oy1� �4 p> Y, G f`Y`Oi ^«�>i� aL•v! Yr !• �0 C1 GY' 4 NL.0 w d.� Yww «Y. Qi «,. 3L :!6`� a?v N Y b k 3+ ~h` o'sYr ��� i`^Ru4 `mgY�iy IN Sm. R �wsgyo « epu� V .F C O.a L ✓ 4.d" 4 b .V .C1A .. 1 �~4OCS tq (�(�1Vl yy� u C Y(! 01 q w G =Y NY o N G^ = Y yy �i - � '�^a a q i CCpi O V {� �3r CC N� N kCV� A 1� �SN C_id i' Y pN � Ow'''po i^Cwi L ✓ M 4C 1w N •L m0 OHO yL✓ d > acSttP '''' �� �r6-^ �ZM+.,9_i,� ± g";vo A^� Sp�`�ypCe .m� '"•w - N�N� w S w�� s 4>Q tyOJ L�•�6" M fpw� L V' �• Cq L ��'e a w C Yp .a[ c �pup4gs V � oOb • M LO `~•Na C 7 � �pFw LLtl • � ws Y c� �aI SY GL wCC• w�{✓y�� L C J. ®. i'A g✓Y Y $�� �T y Y �Y_fMY N 0 14-2 r"wL ■tYw T^ Y�. C �f.;roG� rLO.O``M N t yYYYyL 3 52 p'Y'C ,CN M... M Nwpe� 3•..` R� 4 Y � C N V � SiOY. `P G�qM YC �' Wy Ye � Y�a�P� �N� tsz O'LCT O C �.� N mM 6• �wC Ca p N Ojw{]� pYyp ^ 4� y �pp� tl r LO MSG O �y N^wrap + C Y y. 4 1 -. .a` at'M 149-1 V4i, yc y�� jam, Y•{L L Y=� O C Y V C Yj.- � q. j/:.� ^�C @a• 6. 8%J aY YN^ N O M.w 9 N C ip YC S I V.y y Y1 q Y. Y ± V Y C O q (� '1yO N+C SW ✓2 L Y^• Cro J+ wLp F-08M Lm 4G A6 �^ lit V L R LGL. 0.0 F F•A.r•w.n i� O tl N� C y •:� Y « y.>■pi' y� tF � v �Np Jot YA C L9+ L YVRUI� /+, Lq LY`CC I` OLY N L M O Lp 'd Ltl0^ V sg YM$LNi C$d ` \ n ua � &■ qQ}p Y=YC MOCC MW ^ey O VicY L .: ppY Y'�.T V O itq aw Y YryNZ a O C SL G r,q $ e { �yC■,�Htlr ... VyV w"i�o' uC Yb oL»ju— WM� p..` V . �l: u. Zia all tl Na ~ y j•N, y « ac w ag �y YO O O yO y6 L H t CY�y� TC CO tyNa V Q A�'C (�(����5±�.� g .c0^�f �0tl� M Y � $ V�.� -ate+ 4• lyN��� a.^y .I f'apY yO N Vy� R N9! L L pY L M x Y.0 l Mq '9 pY Y`� L /J ' S_C to L �MEa��•:i •'it po YC p tl i C COTW GM LM 34: q rtta 6 �4 C _O Yi Y pY iQt a am. � LC $ aip� M L - R' Z. $v p .LoAyU i R e o RS'iP.` o$Y R A-t dN p� a . W y+LM CG r wL'.-.3 lag ci. Ss�LCC >p■tl p V.'�� � ONm�1 ^� iy � yam¢ L�^ O�Cp,aa PCr V9 Y- i O q 4 RR ygsj6 ) �.6Cr6• yY0 6 KCM. `C1d'OI C V Y $L ~eNC ~ ^ y L A V aM L 4 p,p Y Na Y■C ^ u p6 La L R N% Y i«O^ p � QOpe p�W j ,C r Y OI. L�C^ yiy C La 6 M C CN W y„a Y p ez 4:11 J Gp O 00 ^M MY G. MOP�6 oN `-.YLL. R Y L Y $ I� �.` N tl N Y M L Y M! �' ® rIS per. p Q s O xi 9 m &1a¢ NQ YCYy N± N �i"y�N sc^y ~ �Yy� i�i 45 &A O N�C?® 4,��� �=0 N p 9 .N Cam.. YY44 VVqN C50MAg�1 ^N +cbL6 O� a. �. �} KqG Oa�N..i V` NC 416V L� �O�/�Y NY 3LL Cy6y1RY ^ppOp{� Y uMN� 9 WN WYU �6 G:T�fi't tai ApO nV KO�arS 94 C 1 M Y yf: aC I L � t7 F � J oo.Y y ._ �- yv,•Y�� tic �c� o w �s..n o. � N c 3 •• �3 Y �o �� 021,. ._. e.• :G «.cam t = "� _� 4 �-. �N1 � _ Y V Ly =G Mrs.L �.�1 M W P g S Y V Y M R G a Y Wc. qY vLQ YcY " ►' .off �1—c �+j �s a�� o C ii +" .c L oON A a2 e3 .ri.Y.. Tawyyv Qu Lam_ Y 4 O a s. S. O Gg y y�y Y Q» g L 01�y� - ppgx`� C L ��V �}f� C.YG �y 6s� a • ��p aL0 ^V C qi � CFyUyL Yte 59 ^_O. N•�'+'...• n. n•-�y •vFB. »�' ug"a4�L. rtq .�s SL v � �n a u e _ w « g IS t'u a IL icaiv ¢� g N r N Q 4 (� GL CY N�Y..0 C 0 C U E LYy Y V. Q V &" S ti Y�g 7 G Ll I •W O Qy QyM' O .G, ai Ytl �O'Mi _ OIMO S w M+p C« C b • y�f _ Yq r, Y LqO. Yi. �.yN fN• .i LY.� L » 1 RQ 4p yyy s C C M '&M Op^X= 4 N lot .. YCY 6N �Y CN SgS 8g , y O:O ��$ gN Q O pp yy » ILI ie Y6�YYCSi"^eCa M I G Y^" LM tl _ Y- 3. ± „�� P \ r..- f) Y[ �. S g t: t a Y O 30` f Yp E�f 'o� ova •-o L 4i si OVA 1Pn r'O r Y.Yw �_N �a«i I .x 1I(. O =ilOM YGA 'pZ LFW L � peY I C i�� VSY �LYyyLP[y V^� 2 I4+YG K ; t I O+ii Cif �O {sNj d V�V P M.U. V _M Y L r V N N O M V s Cyy qYY Vppu4 90N Ya`I QV W > y0 Q�L+� Co4.L. 4J `M Y� L O V u• p^ MP' w ®��• d L was 7^ G� z2-1 G a Q+4� N Pn O.N O�w ■ti� .�� s "qN=B �s�w v v Y +R ��r� 'ado .u.N r8 GAP Ne c� CL�y Yeppt4 ��dvSc uL aL' O+py yG- C Nye [1 O V YC4� N61 NLn^ >PVi� ^}C�E„�Y>��� qC`M(yr�I�L�• O 1. gL q{YL.=A«CY 4.iYl CG �2 NL O'+ CqEN-a ay^Q��yE OIL ^O. `Y a-Y� Cw� 4 E G �61;G yR +Yc �p Ygwy pG V VZ y�G �si 6 F O Mrd^9 iN SY� 16•V V�i' O.V CO VM7 NMI CNNM 2� i(W Pr L G Y N.G. d.1r �� ,G pe & N 1�.� Ko G L+ .2 J�0aC 15-2Sol -I ~� J bI • �`NN C` ._ 3 .n d E-3/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC, . " STAFF REPORT '1 j / F Z t 1r U > f, F` 1977 f, DATE: August 26; 1987 jTO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Greg Gage, Assistant planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT CITY OF RARCHO CUUMORGA - An amendment o ec ons and 11.06.02 c of the Development Code pertaining to the definition of a,�d, review process �. for State mandated recycling facilities. ;, ' f<. I. ANALYSIS: Recently, the State Assembly enacted An 2029, :'�q a i orni Beverage Container Recycling and Litter :Red '.,i.. abn Ac : A primary provision of the act requires supermarkets with annual sales over $2 million to provide recycling centers,,fok alLminum cans, bottles, plastic, etc. Currently, there are ieight markets.. , within Rancho Cucbnonga which are 'directly affected by this- legislaxion.` After reviewing AB 2020 and, the Development Code, staff has determined that there is no specific language addressing the permit process' Vor the State mandated recycling centers. H3wever, the Minor Development Review process can be interpreted to include the review and approval of the recycling centers as defined under AB 2020. By processing each new facility independently under a Minor Develooment Review (Section 7.06.020), the location and design of the centers can be closely monitored. Wheneker appropriate, additional landscaping and/or architectural treataert can also be required. An alternative process would be the application of a Conditional Use Permit, This, too, would provide for close monitoring of the new recycling centers but a much more extensive review process. At this time, staff favors the use of the Minor Development Review process and believes it will provide sufficient controls to insure that the implementation of AB 2020 will meet the quality standards of Rancho Cucamonga. We anticipate, after the existing eight centc,-Y.,'comply with AB Aft 2020, a majori`,y of the future recycling centers will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission as a 'part of the Conditional Use Permit for the particular shopping center, ITEM F PLANO Itl M, CS!l�t�ISSi'O4 S�t DGA 01IT OF:RAsr10 CUCAMONGA ' t August 26, 1947 Page 2 Q �V However, in order to properly review compliance of AB 2020 with the existing shopping centers, staff believes Planning Commission .' interpretation and . possible clarification of the existing Development Code g be necessary. if the Planning Co fission determines that, a Code clarification is necessary, the fa ?owing definition and language adAitions to the Development Cuee are forwarded for Commission cons(deration: 17.02.140 - DEFYNYiI0N5 Recycling-Convenience Zone: The area within a 1/2 mile radius of asupermarket as ae ned by Government Code, Division 12.1, tt: Section 14609.4.. Recycling-Reverse Vending Machine: rA mechanical device, which accepts one or :more types or empty beverage containers and issues a cash refund or b( redeemable credit slip: a. A machine (or machines) which occupies less than 60 square feet and is placed under canopy and adjacent to a business which sells beverages in redeemable containers. b. A machine (or machines) which occupies more than 80 square feet but less than 342 square feet, which is placed within a parking area or other approved location of commercial or industrial',centers. Recyciiw -Mobile Unit: A kiosk,._ bin, or container which occupies less Ulan W square feet and which is used for the collection of redeemable beverage containers and other recyclable material, which is attended during hours of operation. Containers and/or their contents my be picked-up by trucks, vans, or trailers. 17.06.020fcj Minor Development Review The following language to be added: 6. State mandated recycling facilities within commercial or Industrial zones, as defined in Section 17.02.140. II. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSRENT: Staff has completed part II of the environmental-checklfst and concluded that the pr�doposed'amendment would not create significant adverse envirmgental im►acts. Therefore, staff recommends issuance of a Negative DllkcSaration. ' � , J zi PL NIii Gtk� " R NYNGA August 211659 � Page 3 III. cARREspQNDIiQE. ' Ws item was advertised as a pu is hearing in The'D X+ ort POWS'paper. RECOMKE-NQ-Ok- :It is recommended that the; Phlansting Commission ' TWA.�a� 04 Aes \fut on recomapend ttg•approval of tht proposed ametr meat and "^ -once' of a Regative `Dealarition to a City Count'l. :> Res ul ly � ara e City P nraer r BB.GG:te Attachments; Fact Sheet for California Beverage;Gontainer Re,.�yFling and Litter Reduction Act Questions and Answers on the "Bot a Bill" � Development Code Section 17.06.010-- Minor development Review "j Resolution of Approval I 41 \\ll r Al CALIFORNIk—BM AGE CONTAINER RECYCLING qq AN6;.,,ITTFM REDUCTION ACT FACT SHEET estabAB 2020, Calitorn a°s recently enacted Bottlif',,Bill, —lished a new racyclinrl program to bevazage containers to be administered by the r,opartment of Cony..-rvation"s Division of Recycling. The first of its kind in the nation, t%t program is intended to increase reoy*ling of beverage Containers and decrease l titer. Thousands of recycling centsrs will open statewide s, for consumers tq;-redeem their aluminum, plastic, glass and non-aluminum metal be containers. o Convenience zones are established showing wane-halt mile radius around every major supermarket which has $2 `'1,r" on or .ore in annual gross sales. Recycling centers ctale operating within, the 2,741 zones by,7anuary 1, 1�98 or dealers within these zones will be fined $lbo daily. o BeginninTsaptember 1, 1987 beverage distributors must pay to the state one cent for each beverage container sold in California. Redeemable containers will carry the mark "California Redemption Value." o Beginning. ;OCTOBER 1, 1987, consumers who return their marked beverage containers to certified recyclers will be paid one penny per container, plus any applicable scrap a value and bonus. o The program has a goal of 8o percent recycling. However, if a 65 percent rate is not reached .for any specific container-type by January 1, 199g, the redemption value goes to 2 cents, and to 3 cents on January 1, 1993.. o The unredeemed portion of the fund will be used to provide incentives for recycling centers to serve unserved areas, recycling bonuses for consumers, litter and recycling grants for community conservation cons programs, public education and promotion, and administrative costs. o Incentives are also provided for nonprofit organizations and curbside pickup programs operated by either nonprofit or municipal districts,-, `/ i + Questions on the "Bottle Bi " The Beverage Cantainer Recycling :business to the grocers,the beeera a irt- Act AB_'020--gars tnt°ejjer,Oc- dustry did net want the cost of their " e bill creates a beverage con- t°berl.1987.Srnteitrequiresanum6er produt s to increase dhe c i t o ,and a. stainer recycling Grogram for °jnrtion�Sycfriestoyrovideforrhees• enviranmeatslists wanted litter tifornia to be administered by the rablishmer of eornruience renters for reduced. tt"te Department of Consert'ation-s Di- rtevcling around supermarkets,wei.e vision of Recycling.The act establishes asked Leon Vann.Jr., Chief of the Di- So what was the result of tha E network of recycling centers where visior.afRecyclingoj 11eCaliforniaDe. Qs process? four different beverage container types partment ej Conservation to provide A These interested parties worked —glass,aluminum,plastic andnotraiu. answers to a series njquesti°nr on the s with the Legislature through minum metal--will be redeemed.Cov. g. i law and its itaplrmentation, 3 tked beverages include beet and ether long negotiations and came up with a $431t beverages,carbonated mineral and compromise everyone cc:,d live with, soda.waters and similar carbonated soft Lawmakers took a look a.chi problems ' By Leon Vann drinks. ,Jr, other states with traditicnal bottle bills J were having,At the same time,tl,vs cis- 13ecause the legislators believed re- J tenedtotheindustriesinvolvedandthe "yclingbadtobeconvertlenttowork,the What is the history behind the environmentalists and came up with.4 law requires recycling centers to be set v ttassageOfAD 2020? 2020,passed by the Legislature and up within one-half mile of any super- For 20 yearn environmentalists signed into taw in September, 1986.AS market that conducts$2 million a year s have tried to pass a traditional You study it entrepreneurial and see the free bilk,is very ormo a in annual grass sates, So,the ' bottle bill in California But,because preach to rec y NO)mandated the Department of Con- , t setvation to designate those half-mite +J thaseeffortshavcprowntabaexpensive r'41nredemptionvgalueforrconsumersnas a�� C°nveniencezones"through for all parties involved,a coalition of well as convenient tr lit* out the state b January industry and environmental representa- ties. It does not regal e s atop'or take y I't.87�gdcad- Iinethe department met.Consumers lives was formed to ve proposition icon 11 back the�ontaiaers. The bill also pro. may then conveniently redeem their wise. An initiative, Froposition ll, viides that ttnredeemed funds beUsefor CQn�°e�f°rcashatarecyclingorre- which would have requi'xd a Five-cent bonus incentives,pubic education and demptton center established within one dopostt ors beverage containers,was de- promotion of recycling as well as for of the 2,,743 convenience zones.A pro- Aft 6y the voters by a margin of 55.9 California Conservation Corp to 44,1 in 1980.Alt of the playeLa had litter cleanup, togvision o,zone bill allows the department grants for to tinnt one exemptions in up to tO per their own reasons For opposing a tradi- eentofthe half-mile redemption regions tional bottle bill,Gta:ers did not want established throughout the state. but to take the containers back ill their How dtxs the California Ttev- stores,recyclers did not want to lose a ittcc RedttctIon Act work? ink *d 00 has clipbee determined there are Stores, 18 opportunities, such "°s'�"'��4+• as acu:bside,peogram,,ttveilable in those r zones.And,it is up to local co%crnmenis is an obvious solution that-auld reduce to request the exemption, the materials sent to lantfills signifi- How dove find out mvre fit Starting September 1, 1987,distrib- canny. Successful implementation of ^ AB.OZO and its imp n u[cnwilFpayapennypercontainerinto AS 2030 has the potential to postpone loca governments; a special state recycling fund. Con- the need for additional lant'fil`sites as he Division of Recycling will sumers who recycle will recei,;e the welI as to stabilize rapidly in using re- Ae present regional uorl:shops on penny redemption value plus applicable fuse collection and waste disposal costs. curbside programs and a model zoning portages :acting October 1 %t"hen they ordinance.prepared in conjunction with return,their redeemable contatners to a How can curbside recycling the League of California Cities and the certified recycling center. Del;;trs who programs help? County Supervisors Association of Cal- do not have recycling or redempton lo- ifornia,this summer.For information. cations%%ithin their convenience zones VnderAB 2020. curbside pro contact SusanEddvat(916)323-504or on or before January 1. 19SS. must As grams can be more cost effi- call the Departments toll-free Hotline either redeem al4 four containeF types in cient. Local governments should not at 1-800-642s669. theirsraresorp r fine ofSit)operday. discount the idea of implementing a since increased izcvchne and de_ curbside recycling program in their" � thaf other benefits does this creased litter are the goals or the new areas.if such programs do not already Q s bill create for cities? law,very specific requirements v%erc sec exist.A curbside program in conjunction nder AB 2020.grant funds are in the bill by the legislature.By January with buyback and drop-off centers has As available to cities and counties 1, 1950. if the recycling raie does not proven to be the most effective means of to set up local Community Conservation reach lid pecrent,the redemption value removing materials from the waste Corps projects which can assist mania i will be increased to two cents.If(:1:Jan- stream.A multi-material curbside pro- ipalities in recycling and litter abate- uary 1.1993,the rare still is not 65per_ grain.one that collects several types of meat a_ivities.Using the Conservation f cent. the redemption value would recyclables.provides the most conven- Corps on local recycling and litter proj- incr[rsse to three cents. ience tx consumers. ects could be a real savings to cities. At the penny level,the measure will Zoni-ag ordinances in some Wi.w specific issues should bring in approximately 5t00 million a s cities do not allow rec,mlin �• cities be considering tight year. ofti—nds oeeme gintainershe untbe- centers.How` the Department hart now. cause of u redeemed containers vv ill ga s filing that problem? to a 'Red nption Bonus 3ccount�" � Zoning and zoning ordi s Such funds will[ `used to esrablish re- /� Ctn"enience was a major issue o are the major issues fL. I demption centers- unserved areas,to i"1e for legislators wren they were governments right now. Cities need to provide recycling and fitter abatement drafungthisbill.That'swhytheycalled evaluate how theircurren[permiuing grants to Cnmmunity Con+ervation for recycling locations v t- -one-half process fits or doesn't fit with the re- Corps.as bonuses to consumers,and to mile of supermarkets. the legislature quirements of AB 2020. Nla.v cities provide information.education and pro- also was aware that zonini ordinances such as San Jose, Sutinccule and.Los could mot.-n of recycling as wel a ld get in the,way of 1 s to corer providing con- Angeles,ad5antaCrucCounty.already � administrative costs. venience,so they adopted language that have begun preparing amendments to strongly encourages local goy:-nments their zoning ordinances.Cities can con- to allow recycling facilities in conven- tact our division for copies of the model What opportunities exist for ience zones.The:act scys local agencies zoning ordinance which has the goal o; • local governments under this shall not deny apermit for a mobile cen- streamlining the ad ninisirat;ve r,,,cess bil , ter or reverse vending machine,whose wherever possible and to help develop operator is certified or h is applied for local regulations appropriate to different This bill gives local governments certification, on a property zoned for types of recycling facilities. An "over g a real incentive and which commercial or industrial uF-s within,a the counter" type permit process for to begin curbside programs which can convenience zone and with the fermis- smaller"operations would simplify tee benefit them with the growing problem sion of the property owner. it further issue for both the local jurisdiction and of diminishing landfill space.A Febru- says that to deny the permit under these the rmycler, ary report by the California Wiste fan- circumstances,the local agency must Local jurisdictk:ns should be looking agempnt Board states that landfills in maMe specific findings that the opera- at the model ordinance,which encour- Sacramento and 19 other counties, tion wiil be detrimental to the public ages the use of common terms, Stan- which now a,,^pt more than 70 percent health.safety and well being.The law dards and practices,and prepare for the of the state's trash,will be full by 1996. goeS on to say that local agencies can rush from recyclers who will be appear- According to the report,Californians make reasonable rules and regulations ingat your counters soon now that pwe've, lossoutabout37m;ilion tons ofgarbage governing the pertnit so long as their begun taking afplications for certifica- a day.At this rate the report warns,the rules do not r Tc►ude service to the con- Lion. The model ordinance was daisid- state will be out of landfill space by the Wnicnce zori,;."This does not mean the oped from surveys of city and as m tted.Slince residents inaloc 1 c is o tr state is preempting[peal authority.The planners and esistmg recycling t enters department recognizes that it is totally ;'determine their experiences and con- 21110W es ace more and more reluctant tv ' up to local governments to site recycling cenns,and after looking at zoning poli- allow theft local officials to a', - facilities, But, we are working closely cies that have been developed by several lantifiUs,many cities are seeking alter- with local jurisdictions to encourage cities which are familiar with recycling native ways to meet their refuse dispos- them to help make this program a operations als problems.Recycling on a large scale success. Questions&Answers also know that an exemption simply c rI&A,to adopt their conditions on recy- ftry r,inuedl means the law no Iorger will require re-,.-_ xg centers as part of council policy ry cycling centers withrfn each convenience 'rather than part of theronin_ordi- zone, bAt it does,%not preclude the de- nances. because its so much easier to { Cities also should consider whether partmeni from certifying recycfers whr change council policy than to re•amepd the%want to ask for exemptions,if they apply for that city,if the recycler mee-a a zoning ordinance, Of course, as we -beGeve their curbside or other recycling all'of the other requirements,—.or certi- said earlier,our staff is available to pro- prn_rams meet the law's requirements. fication.Several cities and c,)L:n.reshave vide technical assistance and to attend Keep in mind though that we're allowed organized local meetings which include meet-Ss'-if local governments request only a total of'10 percent exemptions- retailers, recyclers, planning`commis- it,and we will have it'-regional work- kthat'. 274 zones,not cities: For exam- sioners and their staffs,to discuss ways shops on curoside programs a;d the plc.+rebe;ese'Fresno may be asking for to meet the requirements of the law. model zoning ordinance in July and exemptions—there are 48 zones in t`•at We've found these types of meetings August.zoning .o that would mean nearly one-fifth provide excellent opportunities to ex- of our 10 percent exemptions-could go change information and address siting Wba:-nie does the state play to Fresno. Local governments should issues.Some local agencies have de- Ve in all of this? AFor our division it has meant • starting from scratch—hiring staff,renting office space,finding fur- niture,and equipment and developing MANAGEMENT �/�NAGE ENT CONSULTING administrative procedures. 3 con- 'i(f/'1 Byl (01 1�] identified anti mzpped the?,743 con- FOR,. (��/ !`'�/� c 4mence zones and made those mans LOCAL GOVERNMENTS available to the public.Emergency rcg- �� ulations gcmtrnirg container labeling. Arthur Young.with one of the largest government consulting ertification.accounting and reporting practices m California,has astaff of specialized consultants requirements-and processing fees have dedicated to serving local government organizations.Our been or are being written. As we said consultants are result,-onented.government services earlier,'we are developing the model p•c'es;.onais wtih extensive experience in all areas of zoning ordinance.and a marketing and . a: cc..•-;y,anc special distract operLtions prorporiunplai is being formulated with input from the industries involved. • r:s of expertise include We've held public hearings and sreet- ings with our advisory committee. at- •F^arc .A-al,,sss and Planning tended workshops and co-sponsored • ^"a:a Sy„?ertms Evaluate:+,^ Design and InstaUabon conferences a,id meetings of local^ov Io Mp.rage-lent Auaits of Organizations and Procedures ernments to explain and fashion the 4n- 0 ,^tan Resources Studies,inclr,ding Classification and plementation of AB 2020. As we near our program kick-off date of October 1, Plans we expect the need for more workshops 1-irfor-ation on how we can help you,call any of our and meetings with local officials twill in- Consalt:ng leaders crease so the pressure on us will con- tinue evep bevond the October Fick-off date. Nadi"Levin Joe Hill rrz-'cisco Sacramento What benefits are there for the r415)951-3227 (916)443-6756 a consumer? Convenience will be e main im- Bob Type As mediate benefit for cconsumers ws Ar;geles under the new law A minimum of 1,700 2'3)977.3390 .+^'� recycling locations will be added by pri- .•a^`" t vale industry statewide vhere con- ��a"°""^y sunters may co !,air nve;;ently redeem their y Seigel y'���t[►� , Orange County ����t containers for`_-1sn:As the program ma- lures and the reach our recycling goals, (714)850.9409 v consumers also will benefit from stable Gtasp garbage collection fees and from the re- Vatomen¢C�suttf,A end- ing pp46 ing in beverage long which runerapidly a idly +Ne take business personally we'll all see the b;neiits because we 11 bq,saving our natural resources which, !r] as we have btgunto realiZc,are in lim- u ited supply.0 u : 'a�.;fr' 77 � r I n 11ORt 1'I 0lj v l3' ant Rcmdew 17 An Intent of the Minor Developoent Review proces. to-`p vasie itis�isii�ratiare xeview,of irajocts+r�i cli,because`of their li,nited slste - �gg0j4 h1ve aiaiiior aest-hetro,. `hand ,use, or traffic llnplicationq,:;and , fir:'. re pie."ir y sigii;2icant ;Impact ON pub_�c utilities or services. the Sltifioc'I�ev lgpt a t-Review,sracess is to suke that zilch rmi.ted j protects comply with ail ap ticseble'city at�andar,,ds and ordinances, and are not detrimental to tom, ii ic.,sealt , siafec ,+iar "Velf re. or materi4n ii ieious to proNrties at improveinenEs l°i that._;vi''mkadiate vitinrty. } B. Auth&A _i'he i ity PT�Mer is a rsriyed to&Wrove Minor Develd�pment Review applicatiauts ar deny£applicaetiords elld 'trr llm oii reasonable conditions upon juah � spproviil. Conoiti�aias tita`, nelstiia' ,butt shah trot be aim ten to,requirements for l spacialc+spstce �<t� e3»l ences,taiiar,;and scr� nin ;requirements for 1 installatioai -ail .nFn#enance rag_.1�ndge :n sniff ecosifit ��aitrol incasures; requatrimen or stew improvements w wioatians, regulation of'vehicular 9 / isiirress. ea�aesa and traf ie Iarc n • tion'trf si ticn a$'hours or oilier chsreretirsatiAnequiiYtmgn cue fniiin of tun asc�aping 'd o er i gt1'tsl osta s rrii.ent of cleYelopsaiant scheiiules or time lim' r for.Performance or coi>i�letion,'acid such attar,•condi"tines as the C'rtp Pianrez.mqff deem ne„i scary to m'r_kE the find",alga retyuirac`in SeLt'Oh 17.06.02p.-F. C. Pro eats R ,3 equuiriii� i:ain�ar i?eveiooment Review ,,sii app.�eatons nor iYii3aor rieveiopnien: ' eview ara required for re , enttal, commercial, industtisl, and inscitution4..Orojects wiaich may or may not involve the issu,�rice of a building' permit for construction or reconstruction of a structure which meets the,following criteria I. Structural additions which do not result in an inceease of more than 50% of E the floor area of the existing building or 10,900 square feet, whictiever is less. Y f k t Section 17.06.020 k 2.. New structures not visible from publi: view and located on the same assessor's parcel as an existing business or institultion� Seid structures shall not result in an.increase of more then 50%of the floor area of the existing buildings,or 10,660 square feet,whiahevdr is less.` 3. New construction,expansion,or si(,nificant.reconstruction of parkin¢lots; 4. Rho es 131 hma nt e.ndlor on t z�iton of an o�Edonr stOra& area on the r."y aSRep,6ite&S,and in conaunOtion wth,an e_xEst�n�*business, .,,r�� ' 5. ih@ construction and/or placement of silos,sat411ito disks, antennas, water yr` _ tsni.sx,roaf or grayed mounted equipment visible from public view,or similar r0ructures and�uiemen asdeterminedv e Ci r� nner. )1 ._ D. Appliicatiions !r.application for';&Minor Development Roview shall be filed with the Plann:rig Division in a manner prescribed by the City Planner. E. Deveelopment/Design Review Applications Inyolving the construction of new buildings or building-additions may be referred to the Development/Design Review Committees for further review,as t:;:ovided for in Section 17.06.010. F pindines The City Planner shall make the foVDWing findings before granting dppraval of a Minor Development Review Replications 1. That the-,iroposed project is consistent with the objectives of the Development.Code, and the purposes of the district in-wh,ch the site is located. 2. That the proposed project together with the Ginditions aWKesble thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health,Wa ety,or welfare,or materially Injurious to properties or improvements in the Vicinity. 3. That the"proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. That the;~ noosed project is consistent with the General Plan. G, Neva Aeglications following Denial. Following the denial of a Minor Development review ape icat on,na&pp eats n for the same or-substantially the same use or the same or substantially the same site shall be filed within one year from the date of denial. i ,, i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 87-01 AMENDING SECTIONS 17.02.140 AND 17.06.020(c) OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PERTAINING To STATE MANDATED RECYCLING CENTERS WHEREAS, on the 26th day of August, 1987, the Manning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code;. and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds it necessary to clarify and revise the Development Code regulations pertaining to..State Mandited recycling centers. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission finds Vat the proposed evTi'a Copment Code Amendment 87-01 is an implementation of the General Plan goals and policies and that the General Plan EnvirOnMental Impact Report adequately covers any potential significant adverse impacts. Further, t!-1 l Planning Commision finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact raport is required pursuant to Division 13, Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code. Specifically, the Planning Commission finds. A. No substantial changes are proposed in any goals or policies which would require major revisions to the EIR. 8. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the Circumstances under which the project is being undertaken. C. No new information on the project has become available. SECTION 2; The Rancho Cucamonga Planning fommission has found that this pro ec w not cre?te a signific>,.E adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance or"a Negative Declaration on January 14, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 66855 of the Lalifornia Government Code, that the Planning Comaission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 87-01 amending Sections 17.02.140 and 17,06.020(c) as follows: 17.02.140 - DEFINITIONS Recycling-Convenience Zone. The area within a 1/2 mil e ra us of a supermarket as defined Government Code, Division 12.1, Section 14509.4. PLANNING COMPASSION RESOLUTION NO. OCA 87-01 - CITY OF M HO CUCAMONGA August 26, 1987 Page 2 Recycling-Neverse; Vendinr,'Machine: A mechanical device c ag scep 7, a ore types of empty heyeran containers and issues a cash refund or a reee- e12 credit'slip: a*' A mvf,;jne (oir machines) which occupies less than 60 scJare feet and is placed under canopy and adkiacer to a business which sells beverages in redeemable containers. b. A machine (or machines) which occupies more than 50 square feet but less than 342 square feet, which is placed within a parking area or other approved location of commercial or industrial centers. Recycling-Mobile Unit: A kiosk, bin, or container wn c occupies Tess than 342 square feet and which is used for the collection of redeemable beverage containers and other recyclable Material, which is attended during hours of operation. Containers and/ors their contents gray be picked up by .t'Yucks vans, or trailers. 17.06.020(c) Minor Development Review � I The following language to be added: 6. State mandates recycling facilities within commercial or industrial zones, as defined in j Section 17.02.140. 2. That a Certified Copy �: this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 3., The Planning Comission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adajt Development Code { Amendment 87-01 as stated herein. = j APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH"DAY OF AUGUST, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE Cl'.-"* OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i BY: Larry T. MEMO, Cha rman t ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy ecre ary it Page 3 T, Brad Bull � yt e11�,p6p 5ecretary of the Manning Coardssion of t ie C tx of Banc o Cucaro gs� ,re ely semi that the fmrggbing,Resolg1tion was d �r regulrar°ly ttth dhc-e �t4gd, 46d adopt cd by thi Pt ¢ Co iss ion o ttle° CiV of Rancho Cu,0a�toaiga`.fit a re�tlar-feting,of the�'adlifng Co a iron ti l F on the 26th``da+�R�Al�us�t, 1947, ". the fallo��ng votJto-wft; AM; ,Go"i-SII^'fNERS: NOESr' COW,SS.;'ON ItS: ASSENT: CO MISSIONMS: - ,f 41 v 1 r€ ` F' }y CITY OF R"CHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Z O DATE: August 26, 1987 „ 1977 t p TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission_ FROM; Brad Buller, City plan no.r BY: Scott MUrphy, Associate Planner r' SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL aSSE:SSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13644 NORDIC res en la su v s on an esign rev ew o ssrnT family l-nts on 15 acres of land,i n the Very Low Residential Df-�Jrict (less than 2' dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of .Hermosa Avenue and Vista Grove Street - APN 201-101-06, 08, 11, 26 and 29. Associated with the tract is Tree Removal Permit 87- 55 requesting :he removal c' one east-west windrow and selected trees from two other eaa?-west windrows. ' h PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIfT�ilN: A. Action Requested Approval of subdivision design, conceptual gra ing p an, bui ding elevations and plot plans, Tree Removal Permit 87-55, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. H. Project Density: 1:'6 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zonis : North - ng,a ami y es aaen ial; Very Low Residential. (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). South - Vacant and chicken ranch, Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). East - Vacant, Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). West - Single Family Residential and chicken ranch; Very low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). D. General Plan Desi nations: irojec e - ery ow esidential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). North - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). South Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). East - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). West Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). ITEM G ' PLANNING COMMT§SION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13644 - NORDIC }! August 26, 1987 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics; The western, ortion of the site is curren eve ope whit two chicken ranches and a single family-ram +fence. The single family residence is to remain and will be U6�rporated into the tract. the eastern portion of the site is",;.currently vacant. There are two north-south ' windrows and two east-west windrows located on the site. The north-south windrows are located along the eastern tract houndary and through the center of tte site. The east-west windrows are located along the northern tract boundary and through the center of the project. There is an additional east-west windrow located just south of tract boundary. it II. ANALYSIS,: A. General: The applicr'l is proposing to develop the 24 lots W10 a coaritination mfibne and two-story units. There are �,hree single story floor plans ranging in size from 1,850 square ,feet to 2,500 square feet in area and 2 two-story floor plans, ?j'650 and 2,700 square feet in area. Each plan has three elevations. Plan 1850 incorporates a side-entry garage t_^. i provide greater variety in the streetscene. Plan 2700, is designed as a split level unit dropping roughly six feet from front to rear. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Emerick, u er, Colemani reviewed the proposal on August 6, 1987 and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The tentative tract design was acceptable, however, the Master plan for the area to the south should, be revised to provide a more integrated circulation system. 2. The east-west Eucalyptus windrow thrc I�h the center of the site should be removed due,;to the close proximity to the proposed dwell. !gs and replacement trees should be required {ito be installed along Hermosa Avenue. j 3. More extensive use of brick should be pro ded on the front elevation of the Plan 2650 B. Aso, the brick should wrap around the corners and,i return down the side elevations. Following the Design Review Committeti meeting, the applicant submitted a revised Master Plan for the area south of the tract. The new plan provides for better circulation for all parcels between the tract and,,Fiillside Road, G,A r7' 711 PLANNING COWISSUON STAFF REPORT ,7R TENTATIVE TRACT 13644 - NORDIC August 26, 1987 t Page 3 i 3 a i Staff also feels that the following conditions should be included to bring the Jentative Tract into closer conformance with the City policy: 1. Corner side 'Yard walls (decorative block) should be provided on all corner lots. 2. The footprint on Lot 11 should be reversed to avoid vi:`ibility into the garage from Hermosa Avenue. C. Technical review Committe*g The Technical Review Committee met on August �937 to iew the project„for compliance with City 5tanda'ds. 'Other than the usual discussion or, underground�n��)of existing overhead utilities, the one area that had ?t`heen adequately addressed was the provision for secondary �to4ss for emergency vehicles. In that the cul-de- sac is.,rougt! 0 feet in length and the timing of the street improvement j, f:�r the Vista Grove, •extensicn and the future street int iY;the 'cul-de-sac, the 'Fsjthill Fire District is tha requiring t,a secondary ina;ess-egress point. During the meeting, the l6gical location for this urgency access seemed, j to be the east side of Lots 5 and 6. The access can .be located within the tract or on the adjacent property provided the necessary easements are obtained. The access is temporc7y in nature and will be removed with the development of the parcel north and east of the tract,, D. Trails C;omii% ee• The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the proposa onr ugust 19, 1987 and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. A twelve (12) foot community trail should be provided on the east side of Hermosa Avenue. 2. A twelve (12) foot local equestrian should be provided along the south tract boundary. 3. A twelve 12) f�zt'ctear, unobstructed local equestrian trail should be provided along the east tract boundary. The trail should be located on the west side of the existing windrow. E. Twee Removal: Originally, the applicant was proposing to remove only lose trees in direct conflict with improvements to the site (streets, trails, residences). This results in selected trees being removed from the windrays. During the Design Review Committee meeting, howEver, the Committee recLonended that the middle east-west windrow be removed due to the close proximity of the trees to the proposed dwellings. a The Committee recommended that replacement trees be provided along Hermosa Avenue. k-:kCNI QbWW Tb!! S*F REPORT TENTA� ;k,NOfIDIC P9et2k1887 F. Environmental Ass Staff has completed the Env roc.. aAm. &sment, and found no signifitcant adverse environe t�7t, i�paets as a result of this project._. if the Cc s-S amif' poncurs with these findings, the issuance of a Negative DeclAration would be in order if the Tentative Tract map is a�proved'. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS 1rn project is consistent with a Deneral Flan an eve o C.�djf. The project will not Qe del mental to the Public health' or safety, or cause nuisances or gnifieant adverse environmental im�ac�s. In addition, the prp;,6ed use and s,ite plan, tagether with ISe recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with applicable provisions of the Development Code and City Stan rds. w IV. GORRESPONDEPEC_E: This item has been advertised°in The Daily Report newspaper as a public hearing and notices were sent to all proper owners within 300 feet of the project site. �� V. RECOMMENDATION.: \taff recommends that the Planning Commission approve lentafive Vzt I r-44, Tree Removal Periit 87-55, and issue a Negative Declaration, jl Respe fully submitted, Brad oiler Cit Planner 89:SM:ka - Attachmen+s, Exhibit "A" Site Utilization/Master Plan Exhibit "B" - Sub'dAvision Map Exhibit "C" - Site/Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations Exhibit "E" - Tree Removal Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions 44 I a i . .. i lnaaa♦ aalwTUtk .�— ---� ( y W ✓• T•y f�` ... d 00 tl��i 'u P qq i�`� �? a � v arm• z� ., it `} ♦ (- �{ o ! .4 L_J j. c l T CITY OF ITEM. 1 A- C Lr✓ C CA T f j TITLE- PLANNING D(VIISION EXHIBIT. Salem, rim m.LML ant r 1A ft-,f k ' all ........... e LJ r � IY 2 CITY OF V R A�1� CUCAMONGA TrrLF= PLANNING DR ISiON EXHIPAT:_jiff-21, SCALE: 1, i ip 0=17 Y «_alli' � nRe� ['a�IiC C w.rw. M ;4 \ R �k 41 i ry JJ{ pgr T I�, I EE CF, r ITEM. . ' ' Ir Pr.,-"s1r;'.vt_NCT DIL'ISM E..XHIIBIT-, SCALE. Tit z r - A ==4T i14 - 2 r 7• - i CITY, OF iTE.M- - ,��❑ ,,, � � •,``fir__ y . RA HO l rCAMO1' A TITLE:._ PLr��```II.'�C'r Lx�'L§ICli�i EXHIBIT: �� SCALE- _ Gr % 4 w v V � a 7 T z t CITY Y CF RANCHO Y . ITENt PLANNING DIX-ISM, EXHIBIT: SC A, j f H i IN CID let; tilt t 71�1 zi � a -f�tf CITY OF rrEM-z R.A CUCC"'O1 ' TITLE.PLANNING DjXrjSKDN EXHIBIT- SCALE: � 1 ,� F, T ! d cv s N t 3 it !} t 1^ 1` Ll — •� r. RR Mj c jee} CITY CO' ITEM: RANCHO CL''CANjo�R l� TITLE: PLf�titii.�I Di1'�SK? 3 EXHIBITS-%cAI,~_ J o �s cl• t 01 93 } � 1ttt111 gg00 � O W \--� �♦ CITE' (Y ITEM:0RANCHO CLKANjO1%A PLC. NUNG DIVISM EXHIBIT-P6_._� SCALE--r= G f3 �2� �� ail ��,�•,..� 'r FRONT ELEVATION WMA 1 l t4T4w V(TMMI R ELEVATION 1 I i IT . , ITEM-- � .�. CLr—"\K)N rGA TITLE:_ t -/fr-A fsT PLANNING DRI SICTh; EXHIBIT- 'SC.,kL.E: a l y Aw 15"A y Jf9J111.ffL 1%ft}lgfr j Mlv,..riK Iy FUJ -`lltWYf'IY�.41 LEFT.SIDE ELEVATION J.a4Jr'!!4f•,J. l ' 1 +t.Yo fir♦.. .Mrt.rrw�l..nit+�4rrw.l�t Ili RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION ,;' CITY CF ITEM: RANCHO CUCALN NGA TITLE- PLANNING d�ive��r S" I� I3Ii'�SK� EXHIBIT;-. ,_.SC:.3[.L: � Poll e 2€00 8 4.:' *. ink 111, '� Q aI�CI fl �MYM in fNntl. REM FMATM 1 t.ITY OF RANCHO CUCA�,Njo NGA PLr1NNUNG DJN SKuv EL HIBtT: °? k ray 25M H rill •� P3 Fl ED w'NMs�,yay- pE►TIMg,Qp1P`wTlyIM. �NiaM10.Y1�M FI 1 � I RigmT MEvArav'.CITY OF ITEM: .. C�,'' `���Q;i � TITLE: PLANNING �'1 ?A EXNi1(T=-42A-L SCALE 2600 C un _ ��tm.reNhxM � • w+.ow G7�Ci L DII FRONT ELEVA-nO1V...�....,,•.• . -- - REAR EMATI0IV CITE' OF R.A;"sUHO CUCA,.Nlo.�Car� TITLE- EXHIBIT. PLANNINGDi1'LSIOItic' SCALE: 6 a � f 1 25M C i —— i LEFT ELEVATION ......... .,�« c LLL!!! RIGHT ELEVATION '1 CITY0F, ITEM: RANCHO C j.;C k' NIO!�UA TITLE 6z6k5t7 MO7 Ik PLAti`a[NG FXVJSJC''; EXHIBIT- f• _St�L Ir ,\ = n _ G j Tk W J ®OG VA i r\ Lo LL CITY OF ITEM, PLA^ti'V('VG DR'LSIC EXHIBIT- � -SCALE. m N ; ,• 00 � I 110 t= f ! LU Cl0a o s y i _ I1 i CITYOF CtCA� TITLE= � tY°fi/�`5i" ` PL..k.NNLNG Dlti i Fj'NiBIT'= D-.�..SCALE: r—� T F� J d, •� r W t _ I ci r` A R o '•9 f ? Q Y CITY OFT IZl .''tiCI- 'CLC�A, .NA T€TI:1E: PLA titifllG DI`'I$K N EXHIBIT. '> Lb ' .-. ..Y,• .. .'1'�q.'�"'p" i ""q"" ''�.'.gyp.°' n • i; <. 2700-A y�.• ''FRONT ELEVATION F� RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION _ E CITY 01' PLANNING EhRISION £.'k;f-MT:!&L-SCALL: 21'00-4:, • s r � r REAR ELEVATION LEFT 910E ELEVATION ' i CITY OF s t�.�,�' HO CL.�C.`1 jN 0: � TITLE: rrr�� :, PLAINNiNG .DI`'1SIDIV` EXHIBIT-0 17 SIC y .f �€ jN a tl �t .Q 6s Q . w QQ<1QCi IQQ .fJ FRONT ELEVATION. h ` r RIWIC:SIDE ELEVATION ........ I I CITY ITEM.- � �i ; TITLE- �+lf.- PLANNI.NG IMVL K[Nt EXHIBIT- �5(r1I.E= € t C� ta. ry. 2700-9 ig SW}� �. HEAR ELEVATION Q!, . w 1 LEFT OHM ELEVATION i OF may{IT�y�'(/��� q��{ Y�g� ITEM: PLANNING DIV61ON EXHIBIT-. SCALE.. n , r` - •- r.. � Es.VW r I tF. 4 Ali h , e N s j j=i Mir t CIS"Y o;, AA �C ITEM: PLANNING !XVISM EX iIEIT+D-AP SCA[.I!'# h •'I{ u r -� ' I l 1 ! 11 T �r�R tl 4IL o 1 j N s 4 ;1-4L.w�T��� —7-1���'Fmss�--�-•-ems T'P'.�7_'.�T'7� �• CITY CF rrEtit 10&4V RANCHOCLJCA GA TITLE: 4 PLANNING ]DIVISION EXHIBIT- SCALE: (. 0 e� AWL RFSOLUTION NO. n s A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13644, LOCATED AT SOUTHEAST CO3NER OF HER`%nSA AVENUE AND VISTA GROVE STREET IN THE VERY LOW AESIdE2ifIAL DISTRICT - APH 201-101-06, 08, 11, 28 AND 29 s A. Recitals. (i) Mordic Development has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract 14ap No. 13644 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application:", (ii); On August 26, 'sy87, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga co:,Aucted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concicded said hearing on that date. (III) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. ' NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as followst 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during., the above-referenced public hearing on August 26, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to p-operty located at the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Vista Grove Street with a street frontage of 330 feet and lot depth of 1287 feet and is presently improved with a single family residence and a chicken ranch; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is zoned for residential uses and developed with single family.residences, the property to the south is zoned for residential uses and development with a ch•,cken ranch, j the property to the east is zoned for residential uses and is vacant, and the 1 property to the west is zoned for residential uses and developed with single family residences and a chicken ranch. i 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of fa!pts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and i concludes as follows: r°�.`- ..,'+.r'_ PLANNING OOMIOR RGSUIUTION NO, rti Augui • page,fi (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the r=1- General. Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improti vents of the tentative C� tract is consistent, with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically sditable for the type of devel4rtmentt,proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is likely to r cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is l'�tely to cause-serious r public health probleAS; and (f) The design of the tentative--tract will conflict with any easement acquired by the public at F large, now of record, for access through or use a of the property within the proposed subdivision, a 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been 'reviewed and considered in compliance"with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration_ ar. Based upon Vii� findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the applic3tion subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, (a) Planning Division: I. Eucalyptus Maculata shall be planted at eight (8) i~ t on center along Hermosa Avenue to replace the window, `Q removed. A deep watering system shall be providel, property irrigate the trees. The location of the tr't-. ,1 and method of irrigation shall be shover, on the final`-) landscape plan which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. ii. Architectural detailing used on the front elevation shall be sssed on the house side of the garage. The revised piani shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior,�to the issuance o;";building permits, I; - I 777, PLAN)73N6 s 5 bP� 2ESOL trON No. r ' •_ TT 1364'4 Y-. dil4<1; •: a � • August 26?;1� � Page 3 z_ lit. Architectural � Railing used on the front elgvoti=on. sh4 wrap around al,b. extend down the sfde elevatiohs; The revised plans s1tjil b`e r�,OLewed"-and approVk the pity; Planner prior t'o`the Usu*ance of buildfn v=-- g Permits. iv. More .extensive .use of brick shall be "bsed on, the front. l elevation of Flan.;26508.` , The revised plans shall be reviewed and approved L'y' Char Planner prior"to the 'r issuance of building permi v. A temporary emergency access shall be provided on the east side of !its and. 6 or another location` approved by the w City` Planner> and the Foothill Fire, DiArict. The ' emergpoy, access shall be fully constructed to the satisfaction of the 'Foothill Fire District prior to f, nal rx. occupancy of Lots 17-24. vi. Corner side yard walls (decorative block) shall be provided on all corner lots. The design and location of the walls shall be shown on the final landscape plan which is subject to review and approval by the City Planner K" prior to the ispjance of building permits; vii. Window trim deta�l shall be provided around all windows. viii. The placement of Plan 1850 on Lot 11shall be reversed to P avoid visibility into the garage from Hermgs Avenue. The revised site plan shall be reviewed and apt r9v by the City Planner prior to the,issuance of building p#-fits. ix. A twelve (121 foot dedicated community equestrian trail shall be provided on the east side of Hervosa Avenue. The ,revised tract map shall be reviewed a,;d approved by the City Planner prior to recordation. X. A twelve (12) foot local equestrian trail shall be provided along the south tract boundary. The revised tract map shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner pvlor to recordation. xi. A twelve (12) foot clear,, unobstructed ocA equestrian trail shall be provided' along the east tract boundary. The trail shall be located on the west side of the existing Edcalyptus windrow. (b) Engineering Division: i. The Alta Loma Basin, located to the south of the site shall be excavated to provide, sufficient storm water retention to;off-set the increase runoff generated by the development or an in-lieu fee shall be paid to the G(ty` , prior to recordation of the Final Map.. � N, PLANNING COJMTSSM-N RESOLUTION NO. TT 15644 NORD C August 26, 1987' « Page 4: ii. The existing overread' tilities (telecm vnication and electrical) on tllx_-_prajeci�siGe of Hermosa Avenue shall be undergrounded from the"f0st pole on the north side of E Vista Grove Street to the first pole off-site south of the proje.ct's south boundary, prior to Fublic improvement acceptance or ` occupancy, %Mztlaver- occurs first. t� Reimbursement of one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future deveiopmefit as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is ft;-.sible because the Fr_operty is undeveloped. A �ortign of the Master Plan Storm Drain shall' /be constt;cted in Vista Grove Street from the westerly s�de of Rerme.ca R.anue, to the easterly property bouro,,iry. Credit fro,, the d"raiti,ans sees shall be applied toirards construction i,� this if; rm drain line in Vista drove Street. F iv. Vista Crove Street .,hall be constructed full width from Hermosa Avenue to th easterly property boundary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. F- The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the ad 9pltion of'this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS M44 DAY OF AUGUST, 1987. PLANNING COMMI;';ION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONGA BY: Larry c,,o_ � a rman l _ a 1 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Depu ty Secretary J I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and rec.Marty introduced, passed, and adopted by tr,e Planning Commisr-lon of the City of Rancho rucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 2b1h day -of August,_ 1987, by the follor±ing vote-to-wit: AYES: CObSMISSIONF?S: NOES; C� MISSIONOS: ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: r, aUav:. i�i aNc eCoi � ",' `S4A`N3 wmUM rVp 4N6ppp ..I NSCy�`4^ j il,g�:'�,y pa.$ .19 ivC��fl �y: i.Y.y� `iSdry� �' I \.,u � $� S� ..n� tit388�n� % —:fit- .,A Ili i®• �+ Y ft a ys g a �jaE.M4Tr.% Pr s ' � `off^�' �r' iS<. S »u E GYM+ vO le 3S i p , i31� V g _y Ig Vn �O ps G »w�+ Y ii �■■aic0� Y its # _. E'g`� it Lo G-33' 44i^ 1�e�y Y`�i J�T� � �� +�a��n JN VEN �V 4=i+„O.uyi,�lCp �. �,�:•5�= VVtSN Oe�'��V4�: RN a N VO.4 ixii ty YYp• '+t� r' ley+�1« Y��Q. YYY�V w�a~ ��i!o�{��W�r� LDS � ✓s`�,y� �GO X FA CMC Vis y !N� Lv� •r 4igu. «�^Yy V�`9 �OY`� LR"- y 4_`o.r'p�'�. 3p'C�VOI=i1.1� ',�.4 �t $�'�4v� .'1ST b N�> • G L p yy+ e Y � f N re N �s jz 23 r n"t �y='S n& dL it aura I �N.x � `I fit ^O� IMP �C Tess & 133 e? ! fit W ,' 8� ��r �� w Y� �Y� NY YiY6 y Or�O%.Hu V tit •;sY� O�q 1'� nw N•C w i F M 2 3 5 r.59 >a k NlMr Mii ... �r � MVb- �LVI.pf Y�My�i.9 CC ` t p aM+ vas gas1 ta- $ Vp � � R � � th lieX. 35 s At s tijrj. cyrn �. .1 i�.Y�N �l y��.� 6 L^pJ y� a M3" � y�Yytom'$ ijL ~_^� i V _5 y� pyp pNCCy� ''iir C■1= J2 �L gam._ ir^ y1431■ CO SHpt:`s.GY +- E A ►M O~ �N Y Y�}. }.�„ � F N L-Mvn <...»,b' .nifi+7 <a 3,Y8e':3F .s { ^ .. �3 q t +�y iUR at ^nN ANY Mr�1Tt� \'t.il i'.�t`�'Y$= Yf M �atyi6i Elk Ali r MY. yy w y�qTw i »pG� 1 5i ytCi _ NY QQQ �Y tt 'tVy��1t po "� t Ise rYj^ Qr e?s 1yRf` L, YYn^NT >{ rip Y� Ryuy.� wN M LL9ks3~ I1 � yiA Zw� Fwg .A �«p 1r '�$�La. /14 Z' "� ' N !_�r ii AVG i IIIIL 1 rA Y r lti..O R" y i—c yy Oi A y M yyR. CC p i f. VNN ll�c�cN �p6p � � ` �i''�.' w� off+ ■Y�RNy wYY " '^A !.i � M 0.�` per♦ Yreft CMtyM'^ y` Cy• ;.. `t �.$«' P€ ~ST 161E IIq RR,^g1 w_ `1_ :p�7 pj_S.Y C +4 41 N IR" m p g rZT, t y P I6�L 4 tY+ M. N SIVA y Us _ e a ♦ c_■g■ 11 Z_r Ails MGM a.t{wwj �_�� V YN f.V N.. 4N �� �.y� i�at i�� Yw'^Or. !► :cjt;�,t'� <�+:3r 3' <i�w. �-�,N <v 4�i �o�+=.e. 2'c� �r�i►. ���`s$vZ.as - v r T N ri e iei io " � rr 0 Y�O 'GGS ��C1/Wp A. 32 xp��, i11 OLD -V ��" Y LtJ A' N�4//i� ss WO.gi �10 ILCfJ Y A L0" _ffJJ Cp s CC CC v {i� y^•l (/ ^pp.UNiil/ sV Occy' �.;.../ ppppp/pyY � t +y^ Jim � Lys Silt. 3L' spar c ��.r -2. Ag L 3:b'V" �,^�a TVs-•��$'' 3gMS_F 2 € i 'r �. ^gS _Nv' fayF� - a Y3 X.. d s6 yai� 5s , yi^S i s ♦�L yr� �S`{�1. �O p �4.l a�Ld wr�X gLCysV -�Ly LyTa 9 ,M� a• Mm� � ~ � Mq �Ni�Y�L. Y.FY�+ J �� •O i� .. s 5u$ H VI ^ C `9 Xgi pO'yOp' Qy$sSp�pP s �^Ny4 y VZM ^ Ss� ii i^Y a VJ~L> N� N:.O 6 � ay4 u `• ate Y$ � m ��' e'Z'a' pa{,� C•� P• M� �y ♦ et TYLS ^y CY ii L ,,,CCCyyy M As 5—E,-; I ,R ._iy�s,8'� €CN drt,. L Nrrc _i r224- yp��. L y r �i1,«�.+ i «�Qt 4 y� yy±�� ! V L 'r uY ]1 4 e 2 30 Je «��we - wwXa "7 ��X�c �F.� _: eq�=f!S. �• �ha. s�gy�� �MVDM Y1 VI 2`�� J4 Y .CM 4C 6C `S z�y L 1.MQ Y2Yto dR6�7•'+.� 1. G �, g rr' $� 3'`"v $ ! 5 raj &ARVfit dF IL TL «o C`> $ yE� •r t� Yµ4i a e LL r t M U A Y B. y - t �'►� L q C L C �. u C S LIF Y$Y 2 a Pq� aY n l d m. > w L« Y »� g T e �. L a �' Y A �a N r .•cn. s.. `a 43 spa ate" -4- a a I aa� x rJQ �� x' i�iY.li <9 Yaw. y( ', °3" Y E - iL•i" � � 6v 6` ^ S`i' cr geY a g �a -...-$ f Z. vaE� sYYy o$ie: cr � Y jai TL �� jjL�s"b� V:,c� . T•: M •j µ_��^V �q �' � o�i O cLL fL }q���y,, .:�r`Y$b�. �O P q�i��� og $y�]sy�t1 �~ ~ '��`• IaOM = �i� i H t1N �p� YgY yI. r FTI "s 4 e� �{ :V. y Ycy L Y �Yt e v 1d Q L v ` Y CMG C r y ♦:5 4-,,. .,, i•6 s�'i' �`+L� Yw a.Sy �6 � �� "Y' '°�8g'>'� i,y�)av�t�Y�QQ" �zr�.oc �ZyZ : Fq ��..�it� �r 'YY���• aN �'�' y6�-.gyp. Ic ..Y 0 gypy6.�. �" a y �� ♦ y tyL> M Q N f� '.`pCrQII .N'a'G• n r �Y L ���ii®u-. ��py��ths``+. yLq��..�ti�l�w Lq 11T �LPr�R L • M `aLY Lira Lit C N,l� � •• a '�Lp ay w a fY $ s L�. O N �WC ►.OYN'My � l�a �"� C _C i _ gsgga �,71w$ oa•+ �t�c '� wi C.2 el � � � �d 'e �3q ,�n• Qi a `^ .�N ':G� ^,.. NM Ypa qe. `� MV C Y p iu.L y � a $ OL L Lr � OA� �Y S�s.' �� ��� ,'k�J' ♦ 6 L 1y� �- �T '.tea+ TC�,- �++� +aZ $$$ L i3Ow• �p pV S M 4SITL � Ll . •> s ov Mi Ell n.W+ LT p2_ } `} arsr,2 G w9 Vi S� {•+ lC y Y$ awes •✓�_y nib +T9 w�j N JYOI+$' �. j= Vy✓ e i6N � w �^ G q y . Z_ WMKLrz i Ll® ryYW •C0 f r. O N woe N. wi A w ie N of a {V{I. IT \ Cd YI GYO Y z� 4S �5C �� 9 M Al-a S°�� py� q�Tw aQ pL Y "op • �! g � MeO � �a« g�Gk pl loc�k �p,_,. �I �a�• yp �N � MY� � N w Y�i� {YM��'Y`oC q Ly CaY .Y N I. {7ht L/; N T bq N`pT b■ _ _ae• �4 �dyy11�. pgp�il tLMt sy�YG4�a�. pV� it Z. pf IIghYC 1• xxwo6 g]a ++� q pg � I C �'� ��" sp r YY =�( �,�i 4 PV O� I•NT .�r � qT� nPVg . Y �� ao N� NLj w� N� o. Y � yYlxgp, .0�}p�� a`�IW yqp�(1 Mklly. a V L N Cs.. , ytt aln 2STS NVp s k.I� <L fi YLT C Ca. KyL�I Gqp iw{L m �.. a 9y GJ a ._ Am; .. ;,. 32 2 C, 4 [.� iL Via.jq[ l� `g � « p 4 u v mi T �U-1 f`LLL G1 SAL y�y tpp�4 b a is 4= ate rW' 4 �M `� * o �pp �y�a33' �`j$• �*:rya q�1 A p Ayo �C W� .J V Q�i j �•y461 } $ Y� C t�0. syi0 13.jrj��. Fa` ~mow 'A" yr'OL r i. NM' uY (yC a� sq iY�.dip! v� iL A 2VZ .—:z {1 '�.� ifR vN �VS �C 4. wC' L 'p ipt Yf_4 sW iw a CITY OF' tCHa(TTCAMQN'GA Ign U y D�frE:" August 26, 1987 Td. Chairman and Marrs of thell)Ianning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior C l�il Engineer BY: Joe Ste,a, Jr., Associate C�vil Engineer SPUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL AASSESSGIiVT } AND TENTATIVE PARCEL W 10393 su v Stan o . acres o an • into �^ parceels i n 't the ndustrz.a 1 Park District, Subarea 15, located at this northwest corner of *chibaid Averrue and Fourth `Street., (APK: 210-062-13, 11, 02, 26" 33, 32)' 1, OJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Aci:ion Re ested: Approval of the proposed Tefitative>Parcel Map as shun on Exhibit 06a S B. Parcel Size: The parcels range in size from I.0 acres to 7.8 acres wi :h 25 iri the 1.4 co ? 0 acre range and 8 greawe-e than 2.C; acres. Y E C. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 16) D. Surrounding Land Use: North'- Vacant South - Residential (City of OntarivLl._. East - Partial vacant and partial e ding industrial buildings, Nest —Cucamonga Creek Drainage Chant,61 E. Surroundin Gener41 Plan and Development Code i1si nations � North industrial arK'(5ts area _____ _ (City of f Easth--GeneralrIndustrial (Subareai51 Nest - Flood Control Channel } { F. Site Characteristics; I The site is vacant with the land sloping approximately 2% to the south. r PLANNIN& CO.'MMTSSION STAFF REPOkT PARCEL M'1P 103.93 AL 1, 1987 Alk PAGE 2 Ii. AW.LXSISt The purpose task the Parcel Map is to create7*3 separate parcels to f potentially be �!�velaped by separate owners. lVo develgoment plans have J been Submitted at present for any of ttiie parcels. OR_8h-37y also an'Zonights, genday provides a conceptual design thane for the site. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. The applicant 6mpleted Part I of- the Initial;, tu.y> Staff conducted afield investigation and completed Part It of the Initial Study. No`- ;� rsa impacts upon the environment are anticip ted at, a7,result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Bearing hove been sent,to surrvurt+�+ng property owners and placed in the daily Report Newspaper. `�vsfiing ac the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATI04.'. It is recommended that the Flanning Commmisaion;consider a il� put W elements of the Tentative parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Commiss on �-,an recommend approval, then the adoption of the,.attached Resolution and' issuance. of a legati ve fled aratl sn woul d he appropriate. Aespec:folly'submitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil engineer BRH:JS dl ro Attachments: Vicinity Maps xExhibit "A") Tentative ;lap (Exhibit "811) Resolttion and Recomriended Conditions of Approval 11 r. h! ail �r"'Al s� V f 401, Blvd. y I ' OF PA LL t 4 aH) � f70 r i fo Yl ZE r^ t S• RESOLUTION N6.' 1( A RESOLUT-01 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Of THE CITY OF RAMCHO tVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONOITIONAUY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER NUMBER 10393 .i W"NEREAS, Tentative Oareel Map;Number 10393, submitted by Keith/Lusk 'v Company, applicant, for the p�-pose of subdividing into 33 parcels, the real ; property situated in the _City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, + } State of California, idel` fied, as APN(s) 210-062-13, 11., 02, 26, 33, 32, q located at the northwest coo er 'of Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street; and WHEREAS, on August 26, 1987, the Planning Commission held a duly adr?rtised P0./lic hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CONK41SSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTIai 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General. Plan. 2. That the improvement of the 'propos6 subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. i i 4. That the proposed subdivision-land improvements will not cause substantial envird.,-Aental da�age public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 10393 is hereby approved subject to t e attached Standard Condi*ions and the fallowing Special Co�,di ti ons: i; Special Condisions 1. OVERHEAD UTILITIES: a. Archibald Avenue - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the futur((� undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities° 1 (telecommunication and electrical, except for the 66KV electrical) on the opposite side of ArchibaA Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to recordation or therfinai map. 'The fee shall be one-half the adopted unit amount times the lengtcx from the center of Fourth Street to the north,bottndary of ?arcel 33. b. Fourth Street - The existing' overhead utilities (,electrical, . except for the 66 KV elects,cal) on the project side of Fourth' Street, including the service line to the south side of f;urt.h l j it ter,<_?r � > RESOLUTION < PACE 2 Street, shall be underyrdunded from the first pole on the *3sil F side of Archibald Avenue to the first pole.,on the west side of a r Cucamonga Creek, Channel, prior to pubic improvement acc"ce or occupancy, whichever occurs first. 'Reimbursement of on,-4half the adopted cost of undergrounding from future development as, it :curs on the apposite side of `he street is not feasible ` Because :he property is in the City of Ontario. 2. In order to retain the option for mutual access points for adjacent parcel s, an easement fore-mutual access shal l bs pl aced on the Parcf F Map, :,,The easement shall be 30' -in width, extend 64 onsite from ti is -, street right-of-way tine; and be centered on the common property line between adjacent parcels. The requirement to use the mutual access i � easement shall be dectded during the Development Review process for each parcel. The first parcel to develop shllll corstruct the drive r approach fuli width. * 3. Additional dedication shall be provided on the Final Map to the satisfaction of the City Engineer for the following. a. a scuthbound right turn 1•.ie on Archibald Avenue from '8" Street to'Fourth SirCa�; b. an additional We:;tbound lane on Fourth Street from 'A' Street to Archibald Avenue; and c. Entry M61ument sign and related landscaping. 4. Construct a right turn lane zn Archibal- 1',.;venue from 18' Street to Fnurth Street. 5. The developer shall obtain a corner cutoff easement for the northeast corner of 'A' Street and 'C' street 6. Notice of intention to form and/or join the lighting and landscaping district shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map or issuance of building permik 'whichs-pr occurs first. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CiJCAMONGA BY: i Larry T. McNiel, Chairman AT'MST: �radBu er, Depulcy Secretary a ll PAGE 3` , I, Brad 8�a1! zy Dev*y- A r of thq Olga al"a C ion a#� Rancho CUca �t.�ga, hr� hy cet ify that ;:fi�,for Ong a utivanaIy aix' hegut arl y iniwraduc ii passed,.and adoptad the' Planning Cta�aissib Of the City of R'snoh&,Cw� nga, a* A regul or mc��i�ng-nf;Oe p`anbing adnis w helot on the 26th day of Augd!pt, 1967, b tb'Pl fOViwino dote-to-wig AYES: tdMI��� x NOES: COwuSTOms: AVENT: COMMISSIONK45— i ` f �.i It , III H Su :. > r �. u LIlie a,. a y .. 'Alblita � ky4 Lk U Is wx jug ffi w yjy} 4� YyY .. eFte: Y Illy 5�t fill if . i 411 , A �� a —g_•. i Q r ' ; ''fir 151 4 11 t0 14,;fr to fi. i Yt `L «xrk ♦ ♦ �n 4 M► Y 4 J� � ~. mi > � �^' �r� �}i „ '� ., �N Kq,.. �•�'.IR Vw y$,pMp ti1r� Ni� .,. 24 "a lo Y 1 V r NMil� Cam . Vt tin n qs� �ppY 301 a�LiY �5�l .. Y gOYYp. LY� cyNL �Vy8 _ -s i C L A 6Ca u11� Z G CC �a all 1 n � t. n 6v E � ! Asa M€ 99 b ac 3Tg k p. aL 1 rt i C l a na a�� Ci LN + La O.q N +�� ...a�Y � s��Y y� q■ �p� ^4� izze All It I YL NCO M=^n 6tiV ly. R6r ���� � =.n�� Y C...� w. vi$. .. N Y! < ;\ N k C1fy 4k RANCHO CUC,AMONO.4 1 STAFF REPORT 191 DATE: August 26, 1987 ' TO: Chairl�an and Members of the Planning Commission y FROM., Brad Buller, City Planner ttY: Nancy Fong, As�pciate Pe nner ,W SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT! AND DEVELOMENT REVIEW 86-37 KE' Y-W e ve opp-n of a Wster Plan 7"rr a acre n strial park cdns'isting of 33 rots in as Industrial Park District, Subarea 16, located at the` northwest quadrant of 4th Street and ;Archibald Avenue AFN: 210-62-02, 11, 13, 26, 32, and 33. RELATED FILE;• Parcel Map 1039$.,"" I. ABSTRACT: The-, applicant is,requesting 'for approval of the Master an, , parcel map and issuance of Negative Declaration. II. BAU,GROUND., The Planning Commission, at its regular meeting, of I%y 87 conducted s potlic hearing tb ronsider the above described project. fie�';PT`noing Comissiolt:-made determinations that cefteria should be es` 'fished lit the M"er Plan for shared access between parcels cons-:a'tent with City�'s Policy; end for wecial design considerations in areas of building gassing ane jdscape treatment %t the corn.- ;4 4th Street and Archibald Avenue. The applicant at tt,e meeting stated that th`-y agreed to work pith staff in cstablishing such criteria. With the applicant's consent, the Plannir� Commission continued the project to tFe June 10, 1987 regular, meeting and thereafter for 90,.dayA so as t^ allow sufficient time for the applicant to develop these crit( `a. II!. ANiti.':SISe' I f; De.� n.Review Committee: The applicant liras sv�)�mitted a revised Mser Plan haz 1.5TTes criteria for shareC,access as,.s l�bwn in page i and 10 of Exhibit "8` .and cortcep ual sket#Aes of elevations at the corner of 4th Street and Pchibald Av%�nue. ar shown in page 23 of Exhibit "PL The �nittee 1PkNie1', 01ake ey and F-outil p on August"8 '�1987 rev iewed the revised Mauer, elan and :Ecemmended approval. -2- -87 0 PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT OR $647 - Keith Co./Lusk Company August 26, 1987 Page B. Envir"ental Asse 'sment: Staff has completed the n nme taT"'CffeTc�As and has found no significant adverse environmental impact as a result of this project. Further, each individual parcel development would require a separate environmental assessment to assure that no accumulative adverse enviramental impact would occur. If the Planning Commis 'on concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be inappropriate. IV. FACISP FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to approve 51R, proposed Master Plan, facts supporting the following finding§,�iiust be made: I. That the proposed project is consistent with objectives of the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan and 2. that the proposed use ft in accord with the objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. that the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the industrial Specific; Plan and the Development Code; and 4. There are the provltscri use together with the conditions applicable thereto, Aiil not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or ita►pro yF :ant r in the vicinity. V. RECOMENDATION: Staff 1 !c%,Vends that Planning Commission approve Development ev ew 866-37 :-sld issue a Negative Declaration. Res ull itt d, a l City anner 88:NF.vc Attachments: May 13, 1987 Planning Commission Report Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit V - Master Plan Text Resolution of Approval with StindarO Conditions 7" :, ,�.. y "t -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT-- Px � DATE: May 13, 1S437 1977 TO: Chapman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: BrAd Buller, City Plans, BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner i r. SUBJECT: a—T9.0 crRL ASS 3tr le AN crea opmenbPMEidT REVIEW� TFt of a Masteray 7,o a park consisting of 33 lots in an Industrial Park Distr;ct, Subarea 16, located at the northwest quadrant of(4th Street and Archibald Avenue APN: 210-62-02, 11, 13 26, 32, and 33. (Continued from April 8, 1987 meeting) , Related file: Parcel Map 10393 I. E3ckiround: The Planning Commission has ontinued this project TF-3ie fi-"Fiarch 25, 1987 and April 8, 1987 regular meetings to this meeting at the request of the"applicant. II. Pk9,1ECT AND SITk DESCRIPTION: A ':Action K��quested: Approval of conceptual Master Plan and issuance o a egstive Declaration. B. rrounding Land Use and Zoning: Rar - acan , existing single-family homes; Industrial Park _ District Subarea 16, Low Residential District (2"'a e,.;el l i ng units per acre) aduth - Vacant, apartments; City of Ontario East - Frito-Lay Distribution Center, General Industrial Subarea 5 w West - Cucamonga Creek, City of Ontario ; C. General Plan Designations: roject site - Industrial Park North - Industrial Park, Low Density Residential South - Not Available - City of Ontario East - General Industrial West - Cucamonga Creek - City of Ontario o-, { PLANUTUG C ISSTON Sl'AFF REPORT Oft 66-37 - aNJLlSk.uPMPAtiY May 13, 1987 r r Page 2 D. site Characteristics: The site is Mcant and veg,e#r ��`�a ns� af gn c e ygvineyards. located at the corner,, Eh r , street ;and Arch'ibal d Avenue are approximately two matu pai m trees 4nd,three other unidentified mature trees (see Figure III-8 of ,��e 'General Plan). This corner is also designated as a primary gateway to the City. III. ANALYSIS: A. General: The, intent of this Master Plan is t611-1serve as a guiSelline for future development through establishing driveway f access, overall circulation system, drainage patterns and architectural design concepts. All future •ueveiopment within the Master Plan boundary .would require separate Development , »; /Design Review. A related'parcel map isals'e being considered by Planning Commission at this meeting. A separate staff report has been included for your review. The proposed Master Plan subdivides the site into 33 parcels ranging from the size of I acre to 7.8 acres. The Master Plan i s designed for industrial lot sales program. Individual or combinations of lots will be sold, designed, and _ultimate construction will the responsibility of the. buyer. Tr emphasize a pedest`k, g oriented campus-like setting for the > Master Plan, the veloper is proposing to install all necessary infrastructure as well as perimeter landscaping along 4th Street and Archibald Avenue as a marketing tool for this Master Plan of lot sales grogram. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Chitiea and Cglamae, originally reviewed the proposal on December 4, 1986.. .,;t that time, the Committee raised the following conrsrns and_ recommended that the developer revised their plans to be submitted for further Committee review: I. The site planning design guideline should be expanded to . include provi; 'ins for shared access between parcels;a, limited access on 4th Street according to the City policies and no access on Archibald Avegiue. 2. The taster Plan boundaries should be expanded to include the triangle piece to the west abutting the Cucamonga Creek. The reason for requiring the Master planning of this piece is to assure the tip of the triangle would not become a "no man's land". t: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT s UR 86-37 - KEITH/LUSK COMPANY May 13, I987 - Page 3 3� Written criteria should be added to encourage buiIdittg placement that create opportut:ities for plazas or other ' landscaped open spaces encourage to spacially enclose open space on the same site or adjoining site. Building orientation should include consideration of wind protection for site activities, Graphic examples should also be provided supplementin'� the written criteria. A. Written and graphic criteria should be added to the Master Plan for the uniform design of perimeter fencing wall should the users require such a--security fencing. S. Special design consideration in the areas of bui 1 di ng massing and landscape treatment should::=tom provided to ,:he corner of 4th Street and Archibald Avenue as It is the gateway to the City. a 6. Detailf-I preliminary grading plan should ',e provided that show concepts of on-site grading for each parcel development, and to be submitted for Grading Committee review. _ 7. Written and graphic 1�criteria should ba added for providing design const-11eration to the location of the t loading areas. 8. Graphic examples shoul4 be provided with those proposed design architectural element features -is listed on page is a1 Gf the Master Plan text. 9. Graphic examples of landscaping parking lot should be provided in the Master Plan. The developer revised the Mas, ?r Plan to address most of the C& mittee concert--,aa mentioned ab.;ve. One of the revisions include relocet14—*he proposed Street "G" to abut the westerly. aC acent property as reconmendea by the Engineering Division in providing addi*ionaT frontage access for this triangular piece of parcel. Other, revisions include providing graphic examples in the-Master Plar. in areas of entry plazas, visl Ws entries, exterior people space, perimeter fencing or wail=, architectural design features, location of loading areas, and parking lot landscaping. F',',ever the revised Master Dan di-d not address the concerns of si(.Yred access and the special design considerations in areas of builaing massing and landscape treatment at the corner of 4th �. Street and Archibald Avenue.- The Design Review Committee ; 4.^ y �'PLANNING COMMUS-ION $17A F REPORT DR 86-37 - KEITH/LMSI K irtlMNY May 13, 1987 Page 4 ;,reviewed the revised Master Plan on February 19, 1987 regular a meeting and generally find the Master Plan text to be acceptable exzept for the shared access and the building massing issues: The developer requested that these two issues " he forrwwarded,to the Planning Commission for discusz;ion, ' C. Issues. 4 1. Shares! Access: The developer stated that the Master Plan R prpgrami�or individual lot sales where individual access into :the parcel is preferred. The developer also stated N'. that: shared rccess betr;e-en adjacent parcels may create maintenance and liabiiity'•j~oblems for the developer as well as the tenants. Staff Count: Planning Commission policy is to enoourige ' are�` ccss between parcels, especially r�hen din opportunity arises through the development of a Master Plan, The purpose of tho shared' access is to minimize the number of c .pflicts presented to the drivers on streets and thus tncre'"�e safety as well as safeguard the streets ability`>.to carry as much traffic as possible and efficiently. Therefore staff recommends that the Planning Commission adhere to the Ci.#y access policy, requiring the establishment of criteria(",l r shared access. Exhibit "B" shaws examples of shared access design that are acceptable to the City. 2. Special Design Considerations in Areas of Building Massing and Lanascape Treatment at Me Corner of 4Tn Streer. an rc a d Avemue!— the developer itatedMal"an arc i ec ura ar wilding massing concept has not been developed for this corner. The developer prefers not to develop such design concepts at this time. i Staff Comment: The Committee made this recommendation requ rin'? ng special design consideration in areas of building massing and landscape treatment at this particular corner due to the fact that it is a primary gateway to the City. The Committee is requesting for some conceptual sketches to establish criteria for future developme-n-t--a-nTWd not intend for the developer to prepare precise plans. According to the DevelComent Code, the purpose of master planning is _to "plan ahead" by establishing procedures to address special or unique needs or characteristics of certain areas designated by a Specific plan. Therefore staff recommends that the Planning Commission adhere to the Committee Ah recommendation in requiring the establishment of criteria qW Pt ANNIN9`C`OddMtdR11FF REPORT May 13, 1987 Page 5 o , ' for special design considerations in areas of 'bail ding . massing and landscape treatment at this particular corier (see Condition 5) H. �a D. €nvi ronmen*;al , Assessment E Staff has_ completed the i av ranmen, a� eo sk-aflid has, found no significant adverse jl environmental'I iii*t -as,a result of this project, Fuvthnr, each tr,0vidual, parcel `deve1r. . ent w¢uTd require a separate envi r onmental-a�aessment to,assure that no accu�aul ative a{�lferse e envirun�neotal impact would occur.. If the Planning C ai' ion concurs with these findings,, issuance of a 4egative Decl4r on would ice appropriate. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Ce=1ssion to approve tfils proposed Master Plan, facts supporting the following findings Faust be !Wade: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with objectives of the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan;- and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site, i, located; and 3. That,"the proposed use is in compliance with each of the aprjricable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and i_Re Development Coda; and �. 4 There are the proposed use together with the conditions ajtplicable thereto, will not be detr mental to the: public hi3O th, saf/ety, or welfare or materially injurious to props tie tr improvements in the vicinity. V. CORRESPONDENCE: notification to surrounding property owners within j bUU feet of-7E e project site boundary has been sent out as revui red by Subaree, 16 of the Inaustrial Specific Plan for the March' 25, 1987 regular meeting. VI, RECOMMENDA UN: Staff recommends that Planning Commission consider a *;, er al input regarding this project. If the Commission � concurs wf;�h the findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval ofyDevelopment Review 86-37 would be in order. f { k QD PLAhMINO-OWISSION STAF, REPO►,C OR 86-37 - KEITH/LUSK C69PARY May 13, 1987 Page 6 RespeC liy-submi ed, 1 ' City Planner BB.HF.vc „ Attachments: Exhibit "A"'- Location Map Exhibit "B" - Shared Access Concepts Exhibit "V Master Plan Text r Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions y , E t i I • I i t f 9 k• i i li.{ ' t I ] • i •�� Al : .�,� r ,� 60 co RNERPO" N E Cf MastB,' Plan r f 0 i I i FOR THE LUSK COMPA Vy Wlsv "ID n 1 CORNEMIYTE Rancho Coca= nga, California BYE + THE Wsx Mwauy r` LOCATED IN: Sub-Area 16 Y Industrial Area Specific Play / r - 4; ti City of Rancho Cucamonga Naster Plan Prepared 8y: The Keith companies j Janeary 14, 1987 Revised: July 15, 1987 n 7- %f� y CORNERPZNTE A MASTER PLNNED41 DEVELO� HBO - Rancho Cucamonga Caliv rnia t, T A B L E O F C 0 N T 2 N T S k Page No. I. INTRODUCT ON . . 1 PROJECT CONCEPT • . • • • , , . 'r II. DESIGN COENTS A. Concept site Plazt AlrM' , B. Illustrative , . . • . . . 4 w • , , . 4 Concept site Plan Drawing • 5 Illustr.4tivs Plan Drawing . . , . , III, SITE PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE GUTDELINM A. Building intensity . . . B. Landscape Coverage , • • • • . . ' ' . . • 7 C. Building Heights ' • 7 D. Setbacks . • . . . • . . • 8 E• Lot Access •Paints F. Parkin Requirements g quirements 11 G. Sidewalks . ` . • , H. Storage, Service, and Loading Areas • • 13 I, Refuse Collection Areas • . . . 13 J. Screeningof Exterior HechanIcalEquipment• I5 K. Screening of Exterior Electrical Equipment and Transformers . L. Fences and Walls 17 M. Utilities and Communication } v ' • , • IS ZV• ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES . . . . . . 20 Architectural Character Sketches . - . . . . , . 22 V• LANDSCAPE CONCEPT A. Introduction . . . , . . Landscape Concept Drawings and Plans. . . • ♦ 3� VI. PHASING . . VII• GRADING AND DRAINPGE , . , . . . .. . 43 Allowed Uses for Indum vial Park Tentative Parcel trap . . . . . . 46 Contact and Reference List 47 Traffic Report , . • 48 Xm I INTRODUCTION This MasterPlan Development is intended to implemeu 'the City of` Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Ares S�oeci'ic Plan. It has been preparedCin concert with the. Specific Plan requi.remants for Master 'Plan Davelapnent o and addresses, the southerly portion of Sub�Area 16, located at the northwesterly quadrant of Archibald and 4th Street. The General, Plan has designated the site as an "Industrial Park". The City of Rancho cucamonga*a General Pllr� `and the Mndustrial Area Specific Plan has stipuleked: that a Master Plain be prepared for Sub-.Area 16. A sunteary of industrial park used for the sub-area is outlined in^:,ghee rear of this i document. The purpose of this Master Plan will be to assure that the project develop"nt, named Cornerpointe, will be a single unified and controlled design statement. TUs Master Plan fraC-twark will be the guide within which development will taker place. A uniform application of these guidelines will: o Implement the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 3, o Establish and define specific design controls. r d o Act as a stimulus to achieve a common design goal. r" v Ensure design coordination among adjoining parcels. This document will work in conjunction with City ordinances and the Industrial Area specific Plan. a PROJECT CORCEPT The Lusk Company, the owners of the property addressed j within this Master Plan Development, inte;:�cis to market this project as an Industrial Lot Sales Program. Individual or combinatioio of lots will be sold and design and ultimate construction will be the responsibility of the buyer. The design of each building site cannot be determined at this timed however, this Master Plan will guide the ultimate designers to a common design statement. D43/04105MP 3/26?r ? „J j ... ., ,�f�\:1 77 The desigavom onents which`�comprise this master Plan duvelopaent include the fcllowLtV., j GciS yt Sue, Plan A ' xllu`#;rahiva plan, site ma*A . axed Arch$ -o tural. -ttidel nes r W Archtec.'tri �tsaract�r Sk$tche+s-;, LandOcA&FConc t Pldn and Dev4gxi Studies F. Each of these coagsonents is deacribed in th following M secticans. A tentative xi ,is also t inch suhai eci with this master E3an which indicatss lot siZes and','roe sed ' infr'`structure-,. It is Included here 'Zor refd.�nce ` pury6ses. a - r ; R 1 11 043/04105MP 3/26/87 i 0 4i r, CONCEPT SITE PLAN AND j a ; i �r _ II. D�S=GIv GOMPQN t1�Sc A ConCebt This plan i`.lustrates potential building envelopes within the propossA lotting% d street Pattern far the development.'-area. The intent ;s that buildings would be generally located in a o predetermined area of each lot in der to achieve building massing at primary corners and =' to create Predowinant architectural massing. The F` building envelopes shown indicate the "desired" ;,location for buildings on each 1®t and these building areas may be coaPosed of one or more a ' freestand*nq buildings.- The boundaries of these envelopes can be s;omawhat :lexible, depending upon final budding configurations, btt represent lot.the a�sproxim7t`te locatio o build;}ins on each ¢ � Access pc'i nts� are -isho" to accommodates `k circulation for each parcel. If in a situation where several lots; are consealidated, into one ownership, access r `"-zs could be grouped. In general, access p ,nts should be carefully located in that thel breaks in the landscaped parkways will be limited. The iittent is to Provide a visually dominant landscape edge rather khan a series of rando! , access drives. Access ":ill be limited, all Fourth Street.-- The illustrative plats takes the,Concept site Plan one step further. It shows- -what 'Could be building and }harking as mutt', for typical parcel development. The pure "se is to ssb w the variety of conditions Possible and lcmmon treatments that would be ,;-onsistent through 'the proj�cc site. What gives the project uniqueness in its flexibility with similar trertments of parking, screening of storage areas, and building setbacks;. This Plan is a conceptual Interpretation of parcel, development'under this. Master Plan. ,, it ,is an attempt to show design reiationship4, ";however, final parcel design shall be submitted by each individual ,parcel owner. D43/04105MP2 3%2b/8? �I Jr 4 , a i +T� If e +p 4kc-f'sue y.y„4j ` f 'r" G`I t � t. to + tz RN Rtz 'VI F J� NZ LNIII cn LL 5A, F w Lu Cis .[y.,t�4 LL 1 LU ilk o x n' Z 4 ( aaR7aCYaaiD 11a .)Na . � tu BTx J 13"S qsy, t4f - t y t wa .pro e. _ clrwatXC tttQt�S - W Q � Anal 1'�m¢f Y,ltj vo no : fE ,v �s ] � pa, P8 q v~ L" r, These delines are to he used in cQnje Lion the Xn4gratrial Area S,peciti,c Plan Guide lanss. They , do not ,ssugeY�zerle, but ccnaplement r said Sph if3 c Plan X $delinem, $oipeveir, to 'fie 4xtent these Master Plan Guidelines are more restrictive than tti SSecific Plan, they shall prevail. �#., a�ex�:.7dino fin ens;ty obiectiyes To ensure that the intensity of site development is not excessive or dexximental to the perception of Covnerpointe as a unified series of industrial °opi-Lkksw. 2. To ensure that the ,m$te dsve opsnent does not excessively ifaps -utility o transportation systems. 1. ,Site coverage could be consistent with the proposed use with the parki:Iq requirement for said land use. 2. P-!imum l9t size stall. be 'One acre. 3. Trangpgrtation improvements wig - be consistent witit the findinc- noted in the traffic report at the rear o thin dos:gmrant. B. IAUd22&Pe GoverA_q u ` 1- To ensure that at least a minimum portion of C a 'WelopmeY.} site is devoted to landscape r materials in order to maintain a sense of continuity with ,adjacent sites and to contribute to the perception of Coraserpointe as a "Paris like environment. 2. To ensure that at: least a minimum of landscape materials are available on; developme a nt site i.n order :to contribute to D43/04105MP2 3/2b/87 7777 AA'. �^ .. in order to contribute to wail-being of potential users th�i ervi.ronmental of each site. Guidelines 1. .A minimum of,-,at east 15% of the "pa within the pro lines of a developmenti'aite s2-aall be devoted to landscape material,%. (see additional landscape requirements in, the 13,n'486apa concept portion of this do, ume't r y refer to Xndustr al specific Plan, fob ,retails regarding thl specific requirements. Builds He ghts i. To maintain a reasonably consistent and compatible height profile throughout k' cornerpointe,. ruSde��he4 No building shall exceed four stories, or 751, in height. (see Yndustrial specific Plan fc r furthsr clarification.) D, Setb3CkS 1. To alch4eve a feeling of openness along the stree+bs that reinforces the perception of CorneLpointe as a series of industrial "parks". To encourage some regularity of space formed by buildings on either side of a street. 3. To achieve a landscaped setting between the street and buildings. 4• To provide for a street-side edge which will have a landscape character that Will unify the total development and be sufficiently distinctive in design to differentiate Cornerpointe from other business developments; D43/04105MP 3/26/87 f , 7� r =' '. t 6•,�.by - k 5 cx 6 5. t rov e.ae " � . _ To P._ vehicular sight lines which allow �, diasari�e3'n do f orae co p.0y from allot ar provicja vehicular Bight lines whim a]'lea r s d ne .�gaKass an Baas to properties sa f z�nd s m; U,along roadways. 1 7• TW accommodate maj:ar CorngrPointe id�nt3ty stateuents ,at street intersections leading iilto mad•within the Park. Grid 6 1 , Bulldirng setbacks shad be as follows (eaccept Whim aabdifi ea as set forth in Industrial Area „spec tflc Pa". Street classification Setlatcks Determined From Ultimate Face of curb Average Depth of g Landscape* Setback** Setback*** f1 Major Arterial - and. Special Boulevard 45' 451 25� fi -5econdary 35: 35, 201f Local 250 25¢ 15' * The average depth shall be uninterrupted from the face of curb, except for'�sidewalks, Pedestrian hardscape, plazas and courtyards-,:and monument signs. ** Street fr6ntage walls and fences over, three feet (31) in height are .subject to building setbacks. *** average depth of landscaping ,must still"be provided. Front: As shown per stLaa� classification. Interior Rrnair: None. Except when,,rear lot area abuts a .side street, the setback shall be '5 minir tim.".,= D43/04105HP 3/26/87 ^'c l S� `+,:p°a`"'3�..g.' •::f a,sn^" a ' :'�^^*� '-.,-y' rem : ' �.sra-•m r II ' - •; Rear Abutting Street: As shown classification on Interior Side:. 5° minimum, Street Sides As shown per _street classification ' •- The preceding section was excerpted from. the Industrial Area Specific place. 2. Properties adjacent to.r:residential areas shall have a'7 mini rum. of 45+ building setback from- prd erty line on interior lot c: line and 451 fro Ultimate face of curbs on abutting streets.;' 3. For buildings exceeding two (2) stQTies° or 350 as measured from;highest finish grades, WN whichever is more restrictive, an additional 1° setback measured from Ultimate face ofcurb shall be required for , each additional ;"aught. This setback ;deed not exceed 70i 4. All setback areas shall be fully landscaped in a manner both compatible with and complimentary to the on-site architecture and landscape design concepts. Qbiec 4vac 1. To Provide a clear and logical vehicular point to a lot.. 2. To limit the number of curb cuts at: the !` street in order to maintain a uniform landscape edge to the streetscape. skared Anode tb&t two COWSHM entry and D43/04105MP2 3,/26/87 10 � u F r: F. paS��S";1tQ Y2bh;*i E+IDi1Yts � p 1. TO provide sufficient on-site parking to accosaslodate, all vehicles associated with the use of each lot at any rate time,, and therefQrs not require: vehicles to be parked on public roadways or an lots of other companies. 2.. To configure parking areas such that nth ew Utilized by patrons of swainswain structure an�fir are Utilized by neighbors not tx � r ;ture patrons. r*i,,.dd%Ltnes a I. Parking Requirements a. Warehousing or buiWing- for storage: 1 apace Per i,000 square feet for the first 20,ODo ttquare: feet., l space per 2,000 square :feet for the second 20,O0o square Peet,, X-SPafe'per 4,000 square feet for,all space In exdess of, feet. the first 40,400 square `} b. Industrial/Manufacturing: l space per S00 JJ square feet. c. Research and nevelapment: l square feet (research services�Y).per 350 - d. Office and Administration: l space square feat. P per g50 a. Multi-use tenant buildings where office U" does not exceed 35$ of building areae l apace par 400 square feet. The freceding standards are excerpted from the Induj�trial Area Specific Plan. 2. :20t to 35% of all required parking stalls shall be devoted to compact car rase. Minimum stall dimension shell be, s' in width and 16t in length and marked for compact cars. • D43/4410533P 3/28/87 pS s z 3. All parking areas `shall be buffered from public view through the =use of berms, landscaping . material, and low walls. 4. AJ.—icading facilities and maneuvering areas must be..on-site with the use. 5, All loading facilities shall be Permitted only in the rear and interior side yard areas. s. Aisle width to loading docks shall be a nialmum Of 541 width, exolusiVQ of truck parking area, ' plus: additional If dth for truck parking (tyPically 40 to So .f. 7. Loading docks shay'be setback a minimum of 70• ' II from street prulyrAy line. a. Parking stalls for trailersshall be 50, X 1 �t and provided at a ratio of 1 stall per truce loading dock door. „ 9• Loading facilities shall be adequately screened from the public view by building appendages; walls, fences, landscaping, or a combination thereof. lo.. Minimum aisle width adjacent to loading areas shall be 15' one-way �and 28' for two- way, 11. Should businesses locating on a Cornerpointe development site wish to encourage the formation of car pools by their employees, consideration should be given to designating reserved "Car pool" parking spaces. signated "Car Pool" spaces should be given pro erential locations in relatively close proXimity for primary employee building entrances. 1� 12. Designated "Cycle Parking" areas sj�ould be considered for the convenience of ;anployees using bicycles or motorcycles. In rder to avoid the clutter of cycles parked in locations, it is recommended that" planned "Cycle larking" areas be convenienti� located to employee entrances and be provided with racks having security locking capabilities. B43/0,4P5Mp 3/26f87 '�• (� , \a / 12 i c, sfae�rlks 1= To! provide a safe all-weather efficient and aest+ts',etiIca,lly pleasing means of pedestrian circulation connecting lout along the straetside perimeter.. 4•.__.To provide a sate 'all-weather efficient and ' esthetically ly pl,sasing meanu of pedestrian c� rculation,.serving each site. side sidewalks will � be installed, by the � e7,,te` ual lot builder within Perimeter la 'scope easements. 1nt.ernal street°acape sit wT3ks gill be installed by the eventual lot b � AarT t 2. Qr.=ste pedeatrian �ircul2tion systems shall be prow ded to meet''tme circulation needs of o site users. Such systems should provide safe,, allasveathes. efficient, and aesthetically plea`sin means of on-site movement and,,-ahould be an integrated part of the overall architectural and site design concept. 0 3 �Whe�e usage dictates, connections should #gym wade b4tViiin on-s,}te_ and perimeter pedestrian circulation syuta•p.H. Storactg Serv;ce dnd r��ding Aroma _obiec eve , 1. To ensure that storage, service, and loading areas are locate1 upon a site so as to minimize the visibiA� f loading and service vehicles from primary visual exposure areas. 2. To ensure that the storage, service, and loading areas are designed and located on the Oita so that service vehicle activities and movements do not disrupt the efficient flow of an-site and off-site traffic. D4 /04105Hp 3/26/87 1 r ' •, ' �� E�'t r k + 'TM's a-'�' ...„.g 77..7777g: We 1. Storage, service, ]maintenance, and laaziing areas'aaust be con�stX4cted, maintained, and used i , a.ccoudla�noe with the following conditions- a. Uitlsess approved in writing by th4 csityy, no eoaterilec, supplies, or `equr3pnertt, includi+€q terueks, or other motor ehi Cles, shall ' .1 stored u ( pon a site esecept 'de a clos 4u lding or behind ,a view barier'' sezaa h such materii,aas' sup✓ ies, cr;. vsl4idles�,. - ac Foa adjent sites.. �/r2ny storages c areas scIreaned by visual barriers shall be located upon the rear portions of a site. b. I'rosions shall be made on each site for any necessary vehicle, loading and not on- street :vehicle loading shall l!!,permitted. e. Loading dock areas shall be setback, sec seed. or screened. DbiACt^iveQ - 1. To ensure that refuse and refuse containers ae not visible from primary visual exposure areas (straets, primary image entry drives, floors of image buildings, common visual and recreational amenity areas, etc.). i To ensure that refuse enclosures are effectively designed to receive and cont�kin` generated refuse until collected, and enclose refuse containers after refuse is collected. 3. To ensure that refuse collection vehicles have clear and convenient access to ref4se collection areas and thereby not 66htribute to excessive wear and tear to on-site and off-site developments. i D43/0410SHp 3/2.6/$7 /� G . f; �eide.„ines I.. All outdoor refuse containers shall be vistr&lly screened within a durable 6'pn. • comb�rs, or higher non tible enclosure, so as net to be visible from adjacent lots or site*, neighborilt properties or Streets, tto refs;se collection l} areas shall be persittod between a street aAd !i :the front of a building. 2. Refuse 4c:0110ction areas sxhauld be effaavely designed to contain all refuses generated on- 4site and deposited between Collections. repasited. refuse should not be visible from Outside the refuse enclosure. 3. Refuse collection enclosures should be dielned. .~` of durable materials With finishes and colors o which are unified and harmonious Vith the overall architectural these. 4. Refuse collection areas should be Ito located upon the lot as to provide clear and convenient access to refuse collection vehicles '='and thereby minimize gear and tsar to an-site- and Off-site developments. S. Refuse collection areas should be designed and located on the lot so as to be convenient for the deposition of refuse generates on-site. �� �. ,fir �anin�s o€ �scterfo�- Mecrian raY �r...�?�tteanr 1. To ha^,re all exterior components sit plumbing, heating,praa.Essinc , heating, cooling, and ventilating sysi� not be directly visible from within the lot or from adjoining streets, hats, of buildings. 1. Exti�-rior components of plumbing, processing, heating, cooling, and ventil.atir�g systems (including but not ,limited to, piping, stacks, collectors, hea-i ing, all, anks, F" I D43/04I05" 3/26/s7 rt u i 'i o i ventilating equipment fans, blowers, `ductwork,, vents, louvers, meters, compressors, incinera,tars, ovens, etc,-) motors, shry�l not be directly° visible. It is recammendad that in inn the case of roof- be, Ofesl ch,& nical *W1114ant, building parapets .2 be otesuch height that: roof-mounted screening -' dev'--1 ,not be reguired. If building parapets , da ' not provide the required screening, mecf,t;ical otwipaent shall be screened b , an unobtrusive; screenin ' device that will, appeur 4, " as an architectural�dessi part of the L,verall mechanical e i �• Where root-Aounted qu pment an/or ductwork project vertically more than one and one-half (1-1/21, feet above tha roof or roof parapet it shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure Whi"ch exhib-tts a permanent nature with the, building (,sign and is detailed consistiiiti with buds Wig.f 'Where roof-mounted mechanical equipment silo�or ductwork cts one and one-half (1-1/2) feet or less above roof or _oof parapet it shall be consistent with the color scheme =inth� building in a3 3�asq a t<' 3• Any devices employed to screenteror K components of plumbing, processing, heating, '� cooli;ng;� and ventilating systems from direct view shall appear as)an integrated part of the architectural design, and as such, be constructed of complimentary and durable materials and finished .in a complimentary texture and color scheme to the overall architectural design. 4. Any exterior components of !plumbing, processing, heating cooling, and ventilating systems and their screening devices that will qi be visible from upper floors of adjacent buildings shall be kept to a visible minimum, shall be installed in: a neat and compact fashion, and shall be ainted h a color as to allow their blending with theirvisual background. (j' D43/04105MP 3/26/87 r7 j e, a1' 5� 1To exterior roanlapHants-,of I 1 usnbing, processing, ` Aneatirig, cooling, and Ventilating s bts maufted on any bund i'atRms shall ; ,y ing ara31 is 1'ssa the are an integrated 't"hitec'tut4l 4 fe�►ture. K. ScreQnineT.off Escari �.� amrl- 2ran �,_rs�eers 1. To minimize th• visibility of exterior electrical Oqu,ijment and t�ranufo mjj rs f. rLM pYimn2v visual4+ "Airet areas (streetx primary "+ ' image 'entry drives, floors ,.of image buildings, „. and common visual., smd recreational ,'r`ikeni.ty } areas, etc.). i. Transformers thal::may be visible from any primary visual A�Qsure area shall be screened with either planting or a durables non- Combustible enclosuze (of a , design t . configuration acceptable o public - utility) Where possible, it is recommended that refuse containers and transformers be intearatad into the same enclosure. `r 2. Transformer enclosures should be designed of p durable materials with finishes and colors wh"ah are unified and harmonious with the z _ overall architectural these. 3. Exterior mounted electrical equipmarst shall-be mounted on the interior of a building wherever possible. When interior mounting is ►rot practical, electrical equipment shall be mounted in a locsation' where it is subatantialiy screened from public view. 4. Exterior mounted electrical equipment and conduits shall be kept to a Visible "Minimum Where visible shall be installed in a neat and orderly fashion, and shall b4 painted to blend wlth its uHting bZ07kground. el a c143/a4losr p 3/26,/g '- ;; 7 77 YV To permit flee ix.-tEallatic)n of fences �znd walls within a lot for the sound. attenuatioat. �`"'�se of site security, activities , para�ion of functional and screening of unsightly functions and a�t.iuities: 2• they have fences and walls installed-an such that $rchi ectural design and compli$enta 7y gn e3i ert adding intesresi-co thm cveral architectural °?an .q<oncegt. 3 To have, no ua'a s or fences reduce. � p qualit oaf d6velo.ment or reduce the rCepintetded of corn P 1�rcEption "parks". �pointe as a series of business To discourage the construction of walls fences fexcert, as ecessary to screen outside _ storage ,,n loading, and 1%tvice areas. ✓ 5• To ensure that fences and walls do not, because Of their Tht, location, 5 contribute to or design,, a des;^eaee in the safety of afficiency<,of traffic flows on-sits or in gxonting„ streets. 1, No fence or wall shall be constructed ,closer than thirty (30) feet from the curbli:ie of a fronting street unless excefid 3�o„, it is of a heicyiit not to 2. No fence or wall shall exceed a height of $to" unless otherwise approved by the City of Rancho tucamonga- 3. All fences and walls shall be designed as an ` integrated part Of ::he overall architectural and site design. All matRrials shall be durable and finished in tekt res. { complimentary of and calar� design.,. the overali akhitetetura`i r E1�3/04 2 05MF` 3/26/8 i T �' 4. F fit'lain link fencing may be used in 'a7 Sala not, visakii in the front setback area. �� �;1;,�;air,�d �'oel�l�n.3C8tfa12^g►siviceg .> 1. To .have the d0r,ye4ointe \interior a3"treEtscape polect visually fraB ,of unss ghtly cav$rheacl power aW -telephone Finns, Ot llty polog •and ot�ss eatiliti; sand communicatip oquip,+=h and.: com}2Isr*tts. 2. To ' PZOPact' OZf-site utility syscta�ms %from becOMIlag over-burdened�:`'by indivi.duaX, lot utility ayaataas. 3. _Achieve minimum disruption ofbtf-site utlla�:ties, paling, and landscape during ti construction and maintenance of on-site utility �I systems. 2. All exterior on-aate u,tf')itiea including, but , not limited to, drainage systems, sewers, gas lines,iI water irons, land electrical, telepFione, and cammunicata`cns wires and equipment, shall be installed an�maintained underground. 2. cn-site underground utilities shall be designed and installed to minimize the cEisrt -"ion 'of off-site utilitirca, paving and 3andscij4 during construction and maintenance, and shall be of such; a design so as not to glace excessive burdens upon off-situ utility systems during 3. No antenna or device for transmission or receptigt, of any signals including, but not limitedrrto, telephone, television, and radio, f sh4li �e placed on any ,7tgt so that it i.s < visible from the primary eettiadte area. 4. Temporary oXerhead peer and telephon / facilities are,'permitter} dfirir�g constructxsan. f D43/04105MP2 3/2ti/87 �.9 v �a r _ , i These guidelines are.. �0 bs rased it con. Iredust2a7 ea ea ' Pemific.`Flan Guidelift's. not s ie;rsed { b4t cem lEsmen ,. se ei axr,Guiaelinea2 How ver e"eaetsnt k these ba ta5c ari guidelines 6)PO more rest`ictive t:an, tha„S ii`ic P arr, "t e s ha'll=pr-evre .'• �L ind and bu faess en i ro a kt of f �� enhancing the Phvalcal 2. Ensure land u10e compatibility between parcels within� e � , �x project. 3• Ensisre • land wse gbmp a,tibi7 its of the p,. °fi twith land uses on-adJacent prnperty. r Encourage high-VAlity architectural and' site 'A Mning for the pro; ect Rg��1Ta + k!s All structures erected within the project, with the exception of trim ' architect feature sand minor featuren ; shall ¢ constructed of masonry, concrete,'- stucco, Wood, glass,steel; or other nate`rials of a similar nature. 2. Exterior wa,._'s shall be Painted o^ suitably trar,`.ed in a manner `-hat is be-`arnins to the exterior construction material. " �ide�i-nes 1• the. Prodeft a , rchitect"ral theme will be Arc irs= l�Oft ne, consist •.fit •.kIa g aes tz�i' fry.. ette cool g �- and aa Lst2 Ofi r aT� eat iaq tin@aed vlaosas, I I�43f(�41QSMF1� } 8 U u ^2' Y.til1"Al 1 ss 'ent,fihem�a' st Cn C a* 8^ 117l 2fLa0"An!;,.'y MINA A rh 3- TA x; y� erv?xail heap w " Mom `iias will 4. R s Cediraugh T o 4 s a ed the Sl inte5cesti ng In some cases � ®fin 14trge lots, ClUsiter' AA n p�,mci36 cii 3na�3 1 M- W, 'so i n the wi Xl reduce the 4— 1 7E►49'�k of +ret Wit, S"laias-ati<ordsS,a s.a ^ .� rbox avAnities sty h paints. and :CoCal 5. sensitiVe arrangement and pror-mrtlon of exterior window Openings, exterior fascia treatmento and building accent areas, helps relieve the massive .anpearanee raf las�cta= exPansiVa exterior walls. Variations in the Proportions of window openings at the lower, leVel of a building struc outure soften its transition with the grnd play. Recessed window openings ;also provide relief along the exterior building walls. _33 k 3. r'•a, � c 4 _ t a s 9.Era} F s =1 t 3q Lp : .tea mk 4, j II x' e, �� J✓at�ixi� Y� "i` Y 14 A .a 1 �e S � I 1 R k� • .f 1 t 4 a - ..aimrr- y f � Td' d sr} ,Page �w I ` 1 1 i i i A RTIST-".S-CONCEPT THE KEMH .Sj`E" - f 111�N6, Ct�IVII,a.�NIES r; t y � , r r CONCEPT e' V THE KEITH COMPANIES r e i s ------------- r` THE E r�''�i G Es f V T A�TD�GAPF OFdG-"ten pg A� c, F The landscape consists of elements that give gozT[ to t exterior spaces;. thus, the character of the lands.cups is created y elements such as act-eats and bt1 setbacks and the variety and placament of laiedscape �* elements. ive:t that P of ect architecture and buildin s ��Yithin d�orne painte will most likely. he of va''sts ='Pes A,AM s.ix�s, landscap3hg as a desi ryfnq a play the k gn' element will env r e in cresting and conveying the,ove-gall character of Cornarpoir�te as a "Parklike" work environment. The purpose, tl',en, of- hese �g h Design Gdelnes' is to Landscape 170vide design 4rit ria which will help to ensure that Cornerpointe achieve that is diethetave, clearly unde�rsta '-�4b2+a,an �a :< unified. , �, ti-n't'rAdLci^ :nth As a part of the_C�r�nerpointe Master Plan, a Master Landscape Plan fi4ss bed�n' �conceiVed to organize, unify, and create a distinctive whole of Corner ointe. character for thep The Master .Landscape plan recognizes that the project consists of two Prominent zones, namelyk the streetscape zone and the interior zone, An derstanding of the nature - of these two zones is important to understanding j the landscape design guide2,3,nes and their intent. The Streetscape Zone is the setting zone and includes all arterial image , collector roads. All improvements within this corridor will have the greatest_ of control. Attributes within this 2s,ne include. a• The Landscape Easement: This is a public easement beginning at the back of curb and extending inward for a distance of 15, to 450 along all arterial and collector roads, j depending on condition. The north/south streets will incorporate vertical trees. Spacing will allow visual D43/84105MP 3/26/87 28 i 7 •�, r \' penetration into individual sites.) Thy will recall the agricultural hedgerow ane baffles east/wast windsQ' The yeast/west streets will incorporate a Landow g-DuPings broad 'hexed trees that will be sheltered by tx* hedgerows. forth/Sou't.rnt ; eet Tees RucalY-i*Ws sidoi xylan rose& .Eucalyptus poly- thexos x iquidambar styraciflua *Palo Alto" Pinus elderea �astfiFFast snirea�tai streat �-P,� Cu iosis Halo p anacardiodes Magnolia grandditolia r Accen Tr Id_ncr & lot entry � '� 8ti a�blyi, i Prunus caroli�'' a +Chorisia speci+ciaa r Arbutus undo-standard B. Interior Zone The Interior Zone encompasses all exterior elements from the Tandscape Easement to the building. This zone is wJbrject to the ends of each, individual tenant and thus is leant to have a greater degree Of flexibility than the streetscape zone. Common concerns 'within this zone include: parking lot arrangements and landscaping, regulatory and directional signing, and service area r..t-eening. It is intended that the interior zone of ` Cornerpointe recall the orchard and/or ,Irove-like infill character that existed between hedgerows of California farm communities. Parking lots are to be planted in geometric patterns with 7'a campy,(` creel. 2. Land2gMA:'°esver�aae A minimum of 15% of the area within the property lines of a development site s4�11 be k D43/041osjf\' 3/26/67 2� - 7 1a A�l e tex. y devoted to landscape maverials unless tithe rise y approved, 3. Parkins Lot Tree Pl anti ng Ri@y?i rsieer1L� a- Tree swells and planter areaa within paved F*warnq areas. shall provide a minimum 3• char planting space. b. Tree well and plantingg edge curbs should be used in lieu of wjfeel stops. c. tine 11.) planting finger ever 10 spaces, J d." one (1) tree per three (3) harking spaces. Barimeter plantings are in(Auded in this calculation. e. Provide: shrub screen planting -,around >. exterior of parking lot. 4. Parkinv at�hd Pedestr .a�► _i k,-.r7 a't an a. Parkikg l ocation and layout sty :4 d facilitate' easy and safe pedestAan circulation. 1� b. If the parking layouI; is ore or two rows deep, a walking spack with a minimum wieth of V between stalls .,should be provided 'at strategic locations. " c• If. parking lots exceed two Mows in depth, the alignment of the ais,les�ishould be in the direction of the pedestrian movement. 5. Parkins Lot ti�ant t�atej,al List A single species tree is to be used for each parking compound.. The tree species may be different in separated parking compounds. S%Jggested trews Cupaniopsis Acerifolia Pistachia cbinensls Schinus Terebintaifolius D43/04105MP 3/26/87 � 4 30 I 6. randscatys ..nncett , _ ssao � d . X`�#i9 La►adsa�a� coca azs es fits' ett,2t���ss i .�,.�rai�e '�tpioal, comld„tions i'd ea4ettttis thst 5i3 b# rquied a,t coM-argolAte. fr n ti D43/0¢10 -17 43 O ib 7 WAAb . 60 12 14.Y gyp - r,-, *THE KEITH,, !� Ct�1VIPIES -- -ZI-41 e � IKITHE' ,KEITH _T, as COMPAMES. II 1 I I I --------------- aswwe►aa�alwswa®aw�w®www,m,�ww��.� ®+ a THE KEITH COMPANIES 1 1 j II 1 Y ..+ ..ham , 1 71 TH KEIM "`' 35 Cr � ar V ' a 3Zr— it i fi I I' *.L k tu J Ul S W • , z W LU CN •+, q �h LU C7 z a t w EUl w Q ct ul z Lu wa z o W Off. U �R A FLij es- U z a¢ O w . m cu co WCD _ o NJ N S o W D 1` CC N {w tu > (ul 11� z a U 2 :. J'Qcr _ U + ~ F .pia a uj Y� Z (no U W F- Q CL U 0 1 34 4 �.:f z tu r W F tom) C: ?,W c M F" J .:i W a o o %1 V U. co m be LL tv K ri -w cr- W ~ m ¢ (� Q N c Q -j _ m77 Q _ U O Qcn i Q Z 'sue CL LU ~ • O z (Do %map "i► '" Q Lt1 yco U) ; C) U � J ,2 a 0 w r5� G I G to W tu i z �U x ' I � � ur w � } w Cr_ l w w II _ w y z Q w ;x F. ui a au CC a .t +L w Y Q N Zj m w -1 _ � Id— 0 Lu CL CSC, •�� � ¢ \LU \ a z CJ Ljj CL k, An M ., �. 7-7 tu U (/ tu cc tu ' co 3 i Q ffi a W cc Y C LU Q w �. > = + c w w JCCW S CL LU � z (Do a, uj F p .� a. cn _. ca CL (i Eta, �Yif d a � �d�n y -w. Taw -� �- �,;:: n�.-� ,�'�=_-�• -c�! vI Aft�iSlN l " The project area T nded to be d veloped in ons cons s, As a ;ot aatl 1'rp7r , love o)iment will consist o£ alu' stt eet:,aacl insxas tuctu e, imps "vements necessazy to a� llssa .indiv' dual lot sa]es and dewaleiaea�t in Y portion ct t'kae ?_op aty, ? �11. as inaplementatiioh a the perimeter 'landscape taeataBnt along Arahlba�Y•d and Fourth Str'scet. D43/0`41 5MP 3/26/87 Jp -� "tI �R�►DTPIG & D WAGE � i The gradirl concept for the property, is intended to �. build upon. the natural fall of the property from north to sou.h. The ultimate grades of individual lots will flow pis. natural fall of the land allowing .drainage to e3tr *r drain to abutting streets nor to drat+, across �l adjoij4;t lots (cros^s-lot draimaga) to djacent streets. The moss-lot drainage concept is proposed to eliminate the needd to elevate the rear of lots for 1 drainage to",stroats, and in so doing, min mi2ma or eliminate 2 J ma3tu#actured slopex bet-green lots. This concept wilt re(Xuire drainage easamrents over )ots which -_ swill be shown on the tentative tract map fir the property, fly I ;} J43/04105MP 3/26f87 'A 43 �. krT7.."vgW 'c.E '!1 ...�`➢ ` � �s `_ 7.gr-,y. SUBnARKA r M."d Ilse Designation Industrial Park Primary Function This sub-area serves as a< tram-Aitldn; none from more �.ntsnsiva industrial or coamercial act,ivitiecs to reuideM-ial areas in the so thwest corner of to ty. As such+ new d�vel opnent�ust be sensitive, to the surroundings with, apprqpriaa architectures and 4i«ts plsnndrxl to mitigate Potential conflicts. Land uses within the industrial area should be compat,iblo with'surrounding �,.. uses north o Street��and along Archibald 'provide for use activities a,.,eociated with airport such as. tourist commercial.. This sub-rrea is sated between 6th Stihjt and 4th street and Arch bald and Hellman and contains property substantially undevelapedw-; it lies adjacent to a direct: access to the Ontario y International Airport: and is located at a gat*way, to the city. E 1 Permitted Uses Custom Manufacturing 5 Light Manufacturi:ag Administrative and Office Professionai/Design Services Research services Light Wholesale, Storage, and Distribut on Building Maintenar_ce Services Business supply Retail Sales and Services Business, Support Services cor,nnicaticn Services Eai:il;q and Drinking D443/0410SMP 3j26f87 u � I , Establishraintip Financial, lWurancs and Real 2state Oervices Keciic A 041th" care services Pcotessictiki services Re tion *�oc*xit es adn3nis< tii* Cb c sbtvices Conditional Uses`` AutoMOUI)e Rental Automotive S,ervica Station Ccnveni;encw. 'SalsRss and 3 es Enteszt8)snsea�t a fast Food` Food a ld Beverage Sales; Pmricral. snit"Crawatory services Persona. Services Cutltur. l i Public as2e4, Y Pub'4c Sarety and itt'?.lty S�arrvviices Re!_-4ious Assembly D43/64205HP 3/ 37 \i r p, t 2, I J ,�— Fri I IMP log Nfi o VA Ah ` i'�- _-'_° £a._.=I• �' , Y_- CIS` _, - �'. -,': Li t c ! f x s 4 fs NQ CONTACT AN, REFERENCE DEv8L43PLt2 This Lusk d*om��tny :. r IX-Vine, CA 9 723` k Carol. PeMine iI #041 Putnam DE5IGIT r-ONNULTj4NTB: The 2Ceith C xianie 200 Saker wtrQSt Co&tZ! Me a, 92626 Roger ISsr'b7�, Pab Cur. sham Steve.-) - -r ';OW-MMTAL AGMIC.IES: Ci of Rancho Cucc3menga 931 Eago1ine Road P. :O. .Box St?7 xrancclho Cucaki0r94, CA 9171'0 PI .ng Department Phana: (714) 980-1861 Engineering Degsaaeh Phone: (714) 989-1862 Building and oarety Division Phone: (714) 989-1863 - I � 1 D4:%a41Q5)1p a 47 -�L �;j k M . 2 r� 144.31 HAMLJt 3i -E€�•' aUITE 1 t >> VAN HtJYS. GRctFpR 9115Oi 918/785.1570 t b78 tw � October ty,1986 l n.Carol L.Penning Pro(ect Manago-F } Industrial='Division- The Lusk Company \ P.0.BOX C?14,9580 line,Californda 92713 511bject• Cornerpointe Businr~ks Center Rancho Cue ga,California Flit Ng-,2102-09--00 r' Oear Mrs.Pennino: r �_ As y9u'4thorIZed in your letter o •tober 2 adequacy of the r - _ 1 1 1986 we have,,ivated the prop sass to are(,internal ejr(;ulatiott avethin the-are, designated az Subarea lq,b the City o ` 'rancho Cucamonga - y ff Subarea 14 is bounded by Fourth`treat, Stxth,�;eet„krchibald Avenue, Hellman Avenue, and ti,- Cucamon9. Creek Channel, and it consists of a total f api)roximately 145,0 aere;� _ O.f�that, C;arn"ointe Busirs" Park- s have a grp�area ref 79.4 acres(68.4 acres of lilts and 11.0 acres of~:' scree sj. The remaining 65.5 acres af.Subarea 16 are`-iWned by others. The Proposed access to Cornerpointe#'usiness Park would consist of theee- local public stt Ms that would 1- 'rsect the arterial streets. i. Fourth Streit midway between.Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue 2. Arch`-bald Avenue approximately 550 feet north of Fourth Street I Hellman Avenue at thz north side of Cucamonga Creek,anproxim,tely; 70U fret south of Sixth Street In addition to the loos: stree.; that would��Pravide external access� Subaru SE,there wouli,.be three e-sternal access,rive,vays, to .. Sixth Sqz c:opposite Klusman Avenue I 2. Sixth Streit opposi C AmetE_yst Street 3. ;Archibald Av,'nue appro.timatelY feet SOU t4r of Six thr6trtci r - T h�A F ty.�,. _ _ ,_`�i •�`'^ ., •`Gx"'t") . _.< <. ia,.. s9e.�._ _331 \ i T ennroo October The three foul streets that a;lter tocat _ stn et; N+auld:"form. the internal-circulation ro"rk'that," I'd provide �' access to telndnvtd�Yil�Cornerpointe t3uiJnessP,ar lotsiarlil Loth*, '! six,Subar4, ph ficrtTes that are ovtnetl by otl erg The, lily rrrt atcY I:fi` prsert eabt served t e o , ,, e the y 1! Pr p.0sed i tterrfal;st pc c net voi�C"wa rd b Assa Nslti property which may-have acwess fr�ni adjacent properti! )r from Architald'Axenete, Cornegpointe;9usines •perk_ the of r G i been m properties within S+ib :�•-, t .3 p posed for &M-1kVidient 4s'«tdtrAn l pats, expept far�`4.7., C[k Parcel that old-1,0deveF Cd.as a State cf Califo{nia Departmeot of Motor Vehicles (RMV) office on Fourth Street east of the proposed local;street, The traffic volumes that would be generated by t;;e pro," 3ed industrial psrks were estimated on theba„is of trip generation fac�prs in the p"te *carton T ip Generation-7nfrd,4dWan,published 5y the Institute` f Tans Wilt Engineers, Washington,''l2 C„ 1982. The traffic volumes that would Etc generated by the; OMy office were,estimated o.r the basis of ttsk;factors in the publications,9th F art on Trip Ends Generation R4�ecrch Counts and 12th Prayress Report a Trip Ends Generotlon Research Counts, ; published by the State: of caf orn.a Department of Transportation in i San 17��6�s J of .f seo�,E:aliforni�,in T974 and 1979 re est"W a . spectively. In Table 1 are the hour, morning Peak-hour,and afternoon:peijt-hour traffic voluf 'i5 rhU wouldi'm generated by the proposed Subarea J%s&veloprnerets. The directional distribution of traffic'in Table 2 was estimated on ths�basis of the cunfigu6iton of the arterial street nazwork.and the t:) ations of residential d"4lcpments, oth'at` industrial devefopm._r�t;, and freeway : intcrchi,nges. • �i __ __ '.��'..:... _ ,..,w._k''#..�,ae�dlP.,N„��ai�;:...� a ._•s.w,1.a_,.. ,.}s., ,_ �.., ��`�: ted ° ".' rs. :..>B'c .^.- go i 0- 2 O.N. ca is 4E ' g' Q Y' g ® C4 H ` 3U q z = to a 4 c h cow a ` w t .51 u s.4` -v CS cm yz ca •g Y A d C C . O t, C 1 .,- lot 1 rs. 'ar"611.� V tlYllni7 3 0+ ! 1$ 9z�6 r A 'TABLE 2 E5TPWATE0-DIRECTIONAL Di,'"r,PEtlSUT�631V (` _. 51tt 1i, A 13 'TRAFFIC � DIRecnoiH J ! 11649TR11tt,,t'dtR% DELy1h77NENT Of Mot, \iEMIctES ?. A T,7� ylkd;dr6 A th!`ROrth ra�Ms�. 25 25 � Yo and_fro�th!aovtp 25 Tolndimmao f 25 t5 TO and fsopll'lstwast � 2S Totd iQ0 as 00 The mornin g Peak-hour,and afternoon peak.hour traffic volumes were asslgnet! to .ine arterial and local street network and driveways serving Subarea i"6, in Figure t are the es';imated volur4i- of,5ubara t 16 traffic ;( F' at the local street/arterial street and l dr vewayfarteria street intersection ns. ' According to Mr, Paul A. Rougeau, city of fR ncha Cuccmonga Traffic Englne�r, each fora! stryit would have a 44-feot-wide roadway within a 65-far r•-_wWe ri ht.of- " in each direction. The two.with one travel lane and one packing lane 1 lane cros 1,200 vehicle; s iee1lons would each have a capacity of per hour,total in both directions. TPe S;� .1hest two-w«f traffic volumes wouit' �e an estimated 530 vehicles in.he afternoon peak hour on the local street norm,of Fjurth Street, That volume would'require Orly 44 percent of the street capacity,which woui'd result in uperazions at level of service A, the be,t level. The volumes an the otiur local stMets and on the driveways would be lower, and all of those facilities also WQ41d operate at level of service A. To accommodate the left-turn demands at arterial streets, it the local street approaches to the is recommended that each of those appro Lanese one for left-turning movem aches have two ents and One for rig} ,Cs s t turning movements, The left-turn!arhould be iSQ feet long, l �` , 77-77 a 1 _ stxTti TOar r—js� s —55—t5,: UZ 75 G 3 "to t i t S5-150 C t � of 1 X ION id POU"Tte STREET J L 2W—So C NO! TO SCALE NUMtII n,OF VEH!CLES XAon:n -� 9 Rtterropn. ?aak ti'our Peak Hour —000 — Oewtopment Sweet _ d r�osrr`e xna tsxn,r 7 aY FlGV'Rm1 c) ta�rF to IkCr*5Aa0 f SUBARE:A't$ pr" 4-HOUS RA�FJC j r`, 3,j . yi A' iVlrs�,�co :.?P.eoninc � v � 41110 ws The ad'ditionat lanft4buld be Provided In one of two ways. i. 'Within the,,49-footiwede loe�il street roacrway,Prohibit sides for a drstznce..of a Parking en both Provide'a �E3foot-tong eft urnal lane,a 6fl-foot-feet ong r tseacsrped a�40>£'cgt,Ong taper. An the tote! eight igh t aljpmach tc ttte�rtcriat strge2„widen the roadway to 5�feet whit ei$tit-f tot-widts-idewalks within the 6&f00t-vide right-of. way- Retafst the Parking on both sides,and pmvider the left.Urn lane and iransltions!lest;abed above. The choice bF the canfiguration discussions with c, to be used`3houid be deterrr'..ned in: ty officials and staff members. ° /f yot have an , Y questions or comments,please;contace us, We would be ° Phased to discuss-our tindinFs with City staff b memers: if You desire. ' Very truly yours, DONALD FRISCHER & AS�?CtATES �. D,onald Frisch-..-,,P.E, �s DF_ALK:/r cc* Dd ald D.Steffensen a 1 1 � r. ,-I � s: R,ESOLUTION NO. IV- A RESOLUTION OF TH_,RANCHO CUCMONGA PLANNING COMISSION APPROVING OEVELQPML,_t REVIEW NO, 86-37 FOR A KASTER PLAN LOCATED AT THS NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF 4TIJ MEET AND ARCHIBALD AVEMUE IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT - APN: 210-62-02, 11, 13, 26, 32, AND 33. A. Recitals, (i) Lusk Caa has filed an application for the approval of Deveicoment Review No. 86-37 a described: in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,)the-subject Development Revi4w request is referred to as "the appldcation". AM On ;the 8th" f.ty of April, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described{, project and continued it to'the May 13, 1987 regular meeting; and (III) On the 13th day of May, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga .Planning Cowtission held a meeting to consider this,project and continued it to the June 10, 1,987 meeting; an&t, (iv) Or the 10th day of June, 1987 the Planning''Covmission, at the (" request 1 the applicant continued this project for 90 days; and `1 (v) 0n the of 26th of August, 1987, the P:w tning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted ,a duly noticed meeting on the application ?r and cenclided,said meeting on that date. (vi) All legal prerequisites to the ad(}tion of this !I,esolution have occureed. 8. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined ant, resolved by the P1 ,,r;iing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: s. ibis Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth it the Recitals, Part A. of this Resclution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 26, 1987, incluf$ing written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: ; The application applies to property ircated at the eorthwest quadrant of 4th Street and Archibald Avenue and is presently, unimproved; and s r.., PLAk I+`t QO f ItiN SOt,U*rtDN NO Y DR Comp any August 26-, iJ&7 Page 2 �1 �,(b) The property .to' the north of the subject sib is residential, th&-� roperty to the soGth of th..t site consists of residential, the property to the east is- industrial., and the property to the r7t is. unimproved land. h5, 3. Based upon P the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the a �veareferenced public hearing and !Jpon the specific findings of facts set fo,,h in paragraph I tend 2 above, this Co fission hereby finder-�zod -concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project, is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and tE (b) ;,That the proposed use is in accord with the }'t objective of the Industrial Specific Platt and the purposes of the district in which the site I � is located; and ? (c) Tt:at the 'proposed use is in compliance with r each of the "applicable provisions of the E Develo�vont Code and the industrial Specific Plan; 4nd (d")� That 'theee propos id use, together wit hI the conditions appiiccbie thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or=improvements in the vicinity, 4. This Crnmiission hereby finds and ce{f tt%'Jkts that the project has been 'revie-red aid considered in compliance with the"6.lifornia Environmental Quality ,act of i,�70 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a ;egative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below end ILL, the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by t` t,s reference; (a) Planning Division i i, The Ma€ter Plan is apl)irnyed in concept only and-,-- future deveTopmerr for �� shall be sabdeci to >Beveloprapnt/aesigr ysew ).process for Planning, Commission approval: ,Aodifications to,the Master Plan shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. f PLANNING Ct*ISSZON 9,ESG(.UTION NO. DR 66-;7; w Keith N./Lusk ComPany August 2G, 1987 Page 3 _ 71 Landscaping along the en:f:+e froljtage of Archibald; Avenue and 4th Street sha} be required. Detailed landscaping and irriaatio1'11 pla;rs shall be submitted for Punning and EnOering Division review and ne approval prior to `recG� ion of Parcel Map 10393 and shall 'l= o leted in conjunction with the IF infrasi r: to(Ie impt ovements. Developer shall dedicate an easeri(lnk, in sufficient ' Gize of area is aetermined by the City Engineer and City Planner, for the major Gateway monument identity sign :to be built by the City at the intersection of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street. Developer shall coordinata landscaping with this City beautification project. (b) fngineerinq Division i. Development of this .site shall be subject to the conditions of' Parcel Map 10393 And any othpr conditions as necessary based upon the review of n specific development proposal WA-thin the site. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CCTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: _ Larry T. KcNlel, a rmari — ATTEST: raa1u er, epu y ecre any II I. Brad Boiler, D< aty>Secretary of the Planain4 Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,!ti\passed, and adopted by the Planning Coarissien of the City of Rancho C',icamonga, at a regular poting of Lhe Planning Commission held on the 26th day of August, 1987, by the)---)llowing vote-to-wit: ': AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: CCWISSIONERS: 1— .3m b-3.'`i'To�.�>.> pr rd�avY yN.gc p�A"o yen aC�X'SZ q.�' �2.r2 . iGi`YO Y "gG'V ' r` C gCf�p' C. \ +$gy p aIvy x $ L�YY NY op'z $n�L US agy� t4 y i� C O IN fitv to ! O flLcc w�LV"' ' ..Yip 4 Y�O Y E ` QN� 2- 6`p. ppa CCa CwpNpYT Y�.�YV Qg2NlC � OOaM 6 Y <M� ✓3 _h 11 Fi OLYV R Y •^�Y t O M Y V L vis Y _ c qp. D 1. N Y4L Q pp YR �Y�'..Vto VQ 44 to Yyf y� Cp le NM- r g � Y 'd'�,E « p' G �. O gDO 3 tlY i Y I �. LSS L VY�1 tp O 'N t }�O.i?v i�.I„a�•N� .. � �.. � r 4.CS O wG a� 1t+M 4!r 1aO�NlCr aOe� 0 3 ,urn1 013 rs N eh r N 61,:,r Ym SIZE nv i�' V N.► O^p� �'Y�Fi �lmy�— Y � 4 ��yV M. �tlr �'F i_1 �uil'� ��Y� Y, buy �Oadi a 333 �� YA i AY"• �ye1 ` - Nfia« fin' Afi�� _.'�gam �g�HE � r'=^ $�,{•. �eN. �d C Ggo� �'a'4i o�c aE^�e13�'� ` •fan •Y NSYi g� ::.. ^G•et ZGY Yb S, —..y "zz- Sz wag' ' 'H.p LL4 � P� sqp• �N��y �eu�_N`yl s�' iLJ ud .a Cj „p„ � •T, np=� OF^� ��q�IMI�gA 4�'YNH Y9Y yf<�V� �$ �1`qi u� .. 3 tC m.e •L.. Mi+(•y �� �qq!Ci��6. L>s•� V $L — C� YC :Zrl peK yy C�.�q�$m —ws �$ � fim� Ca`I>_� 'yqqy��1 G4aL� yyH ^iCp:. GMY^I �O — S4-NSm ` C-l? If L=R N Y ti g - 4 i q _ fie=FY' T �iAiM s 'fi a�i•-"` 'a. � a �i1►Y� a:.`4+� L. o Y�< . OL F e cw L N a`I hJ � �+ZI YL 912 LNmY C ` � pe yCYy••. �H� L �•Z �C .�G` �y p` �—�G `cy_f eNy a!�Y.» u u [j+} + Jb�rM1C 8.�.6MYfis�. RU .�YSri g q .u, s•e n'- oamiy 'iH'�s 6 •H• !fi �p afis i M0 yn w« eo ye CLjr _sr_H X EfiM u ._ S4tfiw a� YY—..pp � eo� Ito � =d=v � v� yve'iio=rilpp g_e CIG NN N V NN f..>tl L,L Y't €4Y GCOL_ O CaNefy YYC�'� O L� O CC A6 V Y^v V_C ^ Om 3y�/ �L •� a,d � Nm MNN �' :.11C 41''�M `BONG Si'•�J d2YM IN •Cue �upLbAZ^ P Ec go�h� � o v$• �, .Qtq+Y V{.y�£1..G. oY yR11.. +7pC. ;is pn ya r•^• t .. 0L£ 3 rG�j LL 43 'pa �np yy4 cA. sa .-rn M:S`Nu «aYo vl. 8;��-<v ��vYn�%3�F�� �`,�'�?cw �+1�X'•co� .' :i r 1,70 C{�y qu A O+t. co z st V CIb O�^b It .E.'�i lG e L 2 �.y t� wM. xiN ��t\L•Y uiN��4 iq ii ' O,yyr w? y 1.35 ^uC MYU Y V VP 7.• pia? `��►G K ytyL M' �w py ypL �y�r� ON CD �Ot�.Apt4X yr 'O.NrL �FU�.P YY CC CRa.�YN C4 O MIN is,,Re py t v+ �8 FF`a9 =E wd nu mri:n •✓ L� l Kw � �Yh00 •� c <x sra e`nr; airu.+ sr' S �� 4 ".tu t�'Yd�wdo � fit it i FEM e_e. jay RNR _y�` M�O9�n E� °yak {N•ff �Y o'�� �� Yc�. �g�;����� Lys;rvi Ly " �1J ^ �iG y ~ gg S6V �.•J �6w it�l �y r iy 3. N: � �5: Y °1 � « _•rAr f.��� V� T u �� � � l'�O C. NiA Li�J� w�j T{�`,.°�L nC ^.z� V 1pu U} g�t$ 4. ° wY� � C��L u�+ S. C Y9V 6Y C' ViY` M.�` Y� it M—pJ66Vtl - 5 • is O w. .S V �YT*g ...�V fi k i e� r FR Ct9JCp OINIUL CC s .+ Etc a rOISY E. y�w 4��C 8 5y� }y �v�Yi'�t pMrr � ca'• 4ry" 4"C't' Fyn �E os U Qp q qY^■iC CO.yy /�s ^4YM 4 a! r wyMY ^_..L. 4 gar sac rb 9�CY,y.��y �O} t N iT y gg� i O V J` =ti O C+N Y I, 0• .µ�Y t p �p " Y.. gp^r CC r 8. ^yin Na.� c•��t��' YQwN � �ww f�t,o��.0 yo.�7S `L" �tYi pgy Nr$ L na �A Y Sys YC�YC C. NC p Gr.�. -' = .V€ b C- Z +..�}LL4 y pis .I H^ 3Lpg�. r ', $4-- �oYCY _N CO.YK «t�tVCC..�., NVO K . �rwYYy_Q}y' w'CO Y GOC ZC6u SiliN �i� r W ' Wd1=il • N-�C N y 6Y� } Y C o � y NAY w �S r. Y OO (•N., ® Y U YY T Sia L atit YO ci C q. a „•i ` p r L e.- au Lau•'- Hp uui 91. C pppp yY 06 �C OC�ii ✓��c $= C �OL `y � �C CY6 �� �rY f Dy w�N 1r(YY�CC M`' L6O p4 L± r ~ � k.r Cg. Sy Np 4r TYL Y�LYY r H L g $'o NN. "�� cm o .L�.� tic �Ny ryY i or EQ en F-11 wa ^Yr C V. C OL � s �fC1tl�1' Vw Y YVW ■^.YL . 9Nr V` C{{{{{{111•�11 ^ YNC q; C �S� � �y�'.f� ���� tNl y UN-p '�"IIN�0 C VYC wYr �0� 6' i C Y�Y C01 Q .cyi ya U� Gy�Oj�O �01.- . Zarc a c Lu•'a_+ u c y O�u.� '�cm itg pie cr rB� �c o^ yNpCp UM Y V' 'aSC �ay C�^ Ygp 9 N yL Vp S gp J L� � '4, H A�q+ 'L 6® O Y N•^ C W Y.. W E 9 Y V V J -- G S O 'E■'.` t o p Y ` s u` N M�i. LLJ -H � 0� C N _ ti Yy C G O� a Qppyyy., L .D �pq _V A�ylit! fi� o �„ G Ya .n.:,^�pLE Vie. c u y c gg } £ yy?� a � �a�W.. do. �30 3fN e'f$ayin ari l. [A as oc c cu �` oYyCY Y +p C^. Cx 3 Cw v LN�`G� ��CC 53 yN his ■ • jL,YoY ^! a� ST` C u:t,�GGGY p C. 9P L MY GYZ"! s Y y �C •bi cC _ yy }�j tw p p n p� YG a Y' �9Y C VYN Y� I,L M $ CQ V CR np is- St �j a $� : ■ � pY` pys .d � �Y � g _YC� ��+ P471�. ... 'Lal Y7� :B�`' O V s O lift! � Y$ Y 6 r ! ALI Is�"' Wig., T �-F R c +■q : .�CqI as No 3r S ' auc��: u • E ij^ppj■■,�. ono �a �4.�CC,u�'c .oi�*j a= Y16 yY, .Id {{.� Na WNA WYti �6 W3A7 a Iagiy ( �w S 4 V C4I�1 N b 11 /3 r {1 Q Yy b yy�1 op Cp 9 � 0OOtW. YV N8 Yi M:� wCC+�OO �.Cp. vy�1..! O M $yO�Y.O � � rC• tN X w �� � �' NYL L. iwt C C Dby NN O1 ,� a -its all ' yp$Sf &fol " F"TZ' ju �$ N a g yip jf�L ?'g 93"�' a+"o r� L`ua g> ` Yy rY +a a n 2i L Y 6C 49y_ -me i g�gp _ tla !. Na Oyll y' R Y��10C�� Y9c=rj g��L p OrE d ,{pd`' � . ad1� $�'a E '�Y �•ri rp ^W�N '•� CLTY� CL �� Yq�Y CV�{i11 rL �� ^Ot eL+ Vy{�1�1 qc �p4 �L ��qr Mu. HD 6.Az� <!J 6' WM.W LLLI 96 4 a WWW V; OL�i1 5M F!W r Oy p L Ey' MW O 1 13 =H y eG CON N 'iL �r. OL r r�Nf c pp �r Lpp ��N� O i E N yp �C Oi � a4O AY` J F.'n., L LY� �YO. Y q.LypW Y! a N w.Ody rT •Y 40 GL KL �Lppp>H �� �C b O Vy ly�" C� YBe Goa 'A iLO.. MQ SC ;� VL H4= O N �yN rfiY q�bL7 �O ry L C all g gpoL =81 �14'�l �C ii d,�.'•'. �yD. Eq. d� E. ffi. r � w` 3{CE E ,r�" K=� Mg�_ G•iY !O G � �N�. �JA �EO Oi1L t H � -fi• r .t e_ ate. j/ 7 wv a� Ygo� 1"g�s e f .� WVYLy laO� � ✓^lU N V !1 n4iN GY F COL O�H OCp M3.y� C +` Ctr� �+aVo/ V� 4YcC AP ♦L p� rprSy I4.Cro VV eMVCE - .O.N L r L « C roa _L y; gOC` y�t N 3`w Y a IT �Xg6� €z�,� Sh4�b1Pp`yya ±=A 4L YL40.p C LrEH 65 Yam.r� � Q 24C� � 6L s s M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��earr�o a STAFF REPORT -ir a c 197 DATE: August 26, 1987 TO: Chairblan and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner x BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUNECT: 7'ERRt9 VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AKNOMEN`�NO. 4NO. 4 - SAN,:ANTONIO, HOSPITAL I. ABSTRACT: The purpose of tonight°s meeting is to determine ix the anPl""n�g Commission wF91d support a mbedless" hospital and related t% medical offices on E�xse Line Road, as requested by San Antonio Hospital. The :;;;vent is to review the overall concept of the proposed amendment end determine if therpe are for issues, and, if so, what these issues are and what add?`,ional e6irgnmental studies I� would be required. 1 II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT: The proposed amendment is summar re n text ana graphic documents in the fallowing attached o Summary - Terra Vista Community Plan Amendments No. 4 o Traffic Analysis (Appendix A to Amendment No. 4) r o Description of Rancho San Antonio Medical Center III. ISSUES• A. Primary Issue• Why does the hospital have to be located on ,.use ne �n other words, why won't the existing hospital site on Church and Milliken work for the Rancho San Antonio Medical Center? B. Land use Compatibility: Is a hospital and related medical offices an medfumAff-gif density senior housing compatible with the surrounding land uses? C. Circulation: Will the hospital and related medical offices erss 0 l'y-T!mpact traffic on Mountain View Drive? D. Aesthetics: Is the scale and mass of a hospital consistent primarily residential character of Base Ling? r TYGPA NO 4 a August Page 2 c` ,r Res ul ly,suwtted,: City p_ 5ner ' (( BB:DC:kc. Attachmnts: r I, j, - m rt _ CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMONGGA STAFF REPOAT DATE: August 26, 1987 Lsn TO: Chafrit n and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, senior Planner SUBJECT: OFF-SITE SUBDIVISION DIRECTIONAL SIGNS I. BArKGROUND: On April 1, 1987, the City Council adopted Ordinance Ao:-"'309' Wich established regulations gu ations for off-site 'subdivision directional signs within planned communities. On July 8, 1987, the Planning Commission discussed how the provisions or Ordinance No. 309 wound apply to the Victoria Planned Community. The CoNmiss,bn _ supported the concept of allowing planned communities the ability to prepare a sign prograr, with greater flexibility subject to Commission approval. Staff1has prepared the accompanying amendment to accomplish same. II. ANALYSIS: The William Lyon Company expressed concern with the . folo Toow' provisions of the recently amesfied Sign Ordinance: A. Number of Signs Permitted: Ordinance No. 309 allows a maximum Ot six sign panes o ead a customer to a site. The existing off--sign program within The Windrows Village of Victoria R illustrates what the ,Lyon Company feels is the minimum program needed to lead customers to the sales office (see Exhibit ")V). Fifteen ,sign panels- are used for each model home sales office on a tc-,al of twenty-two sign structures. The Victoria Planned Community is unique in that many of the sales offices are located "hidden away" and are not located along a major street. There are also multiple entry points to Victoria. Therefore, the Lyon Company argued that more signs are needed to direct the potential buyer to the site. Staff recommends that Ordinance No. 309 be modified as shown in Exhibit "B" to require the submittal of a sign program for off- site directional subdivialon signs subject to the approval of j the Commission. The sign program should include a detailed design and placement of each structure. { ITS K iFfPdtilC1G � F ORT 'Gt R OF Ig l$ R Fb,'IIRECTIONAL StGg$ August.25, Page 2 ) r B. USa of Flx s: The Sigh Ordiy6ance alTdws a maacimam of,six flag 3n I rpe=unc Ton with: a sales . Tice of�Ite . flags must be dispiawred iri the, .i`m dtate viGi;ni.ty of the safes crf�Ire and must by ooa ed otitsi:dt? the pubstse right-adf war. Thy Wit!1ian Lyon Co any, desires flags along toefr major entry roads such as Victoria dark r qe nr �illik�„ beifise their ;iGdeiffis, are located llfterfor to Vict,oria.e StA-ff feels that' the existi•ng- YiGtoria taonwent sCgz►s aed IiT�t' di�eetifaO'k], s.gn st natures located at their Mabr-entry roads::proxide' ample. Nptf e to prospective `6:uyers that there are homes for sale wii n ti YiGt6ria Flagse sre also undesi:.rable.wi:lRhfn public right-of- " - way because of the potential foie liability, iaaintnahce and enforcement Rrobl=eats,, staff does mot-recommend any changes to the regulations Gonoernipa,the use of flags, III. REt;"ENDA't 16 - Staff recommends that the: Planning Co mti scion recoamenr3-approvaI of the attached ordinance amending the off-site sign regulations for p1ansed communities: A Resolution ` recommeriiing approval is bttached. I Respe tfu1iy Witted, Bra B G ty anner BB:DC:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" _: Proposed Changes Resolution of Approval Ordinance i 7'7��� ' .�.. szs, HsT IB£E GOUN R GARDENS MEADOWS MODEL e'e xax�x w•ac:.r�xm:i�„sz...�=��a��,_��z.��z_ �__--�.—z��s�c���,. 2 1 1 1 Sx p'. 10 4 Q ,o 1 d {A} 11 A 0 Q I (8) 1 1 1 p .;,2 0 q p 1 13 1 1 1 Q 0 Q 1 is 1, 1 a is 19, 1 1 4 ' 20 1 1 1 0 ___ 2: I TOTAL 14 i ORDINANCE N0, A?'OROINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE(PITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNgA, CALIFORNIA, AMENUIN%. TITLE 14' OF THE RANCHO CUCAMON 7MUM?CIPAL COD," PEKTAINi T aNS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamo'follonga goes ordain as ws: SECTION 1: Tide 14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is nereby amended by as 1ng ubsection 14.20.065 to Chapter 14,20 to read, in words an4 figures 'as fy)lows.- -§ C��+/ �%ltf��' 14,20.Ofi5 Permitted signs Off-site subdivision directional sign /ttE of a within a nneo amsnum Y: e To ng empnrary s�W4 +nay oe permj e /cLK/{@d Cowtt�iJni y panne community, whim was established pursuant to Section �� 1/, 4.020, subject to the provisions listed: V customers to the site wi thin` the planned com+rni ty '� 1.,•, tlin Cnr�rg�;Q.; , Signs shall oe located within the boundaries of i.re Planned Coremunit except -;;bid signs shall rrat, be located on perimeter s*rests to the Planned all `rty. p�`j�i K do �(aGEct7�of n &C4i �H y-tru,•fure• B, Signs shall be no larger than sixty �, Qy Lart'inches and shall be grouped on a four-sided ,sign 'structure as le shown in Exhibit "A". The top„ hea0c-t board shall identify the planned community. �. �• -A--fi-d���� re snail-lie•-�eea-Y�-���.�an--s-i� `f�`e+awn—e•' �n3--ar--i� a�--•app,•.,vt�d- Further, each sigr, may only contain the rt;me of the subdivision, and a directional arrow as shown on Exhibit A, except as Otherwise provided for herein. • 15a..1'1 I.n S J•'�iLT7rQ• Signs placed on private prop€i-ty sha]? be dons with written consent of the property'twner amp filed with the Department of COMunity Development prior- to issuance of permit, Signs in the public right-of-way shall bo reviewed and approved by the City Engineer issuance of the sign permit, prior to I I is m 4 4 f a " Theirtk 410 3 be 6 0 ddd�ti ., a spar StG�r�i* , dde� il�e�artt° � eboYak ds�ipT'o1fta,rp•�uptepanrce►serad ,d , o ees� po0 . sq ba wed. sh as pustdrsx ' s " es � s � s.a71 a Al lad OtU� `. r { np subddrr siat drree�on signs *ra� �C wady t e su dot i span in e o' mrt t ae ec� pr�lsbx to ti i ssdant`. new. permit. A # lslrndr-ed doIT d1 cas delaai skat1 be Rd ,th to rnstan°�e c oi� b§+ ils the tytfm •. Alar g priemt edovn rcvsacLs of h. `jet may y `ille� Y . nhaal:. of .. v31 W. , deduYc ed o e ad posit, A�L"ti�ar�al oo be inc� ed by then• ty reSuTt�ing foss ttie'r'esoVja1 0, :i11.egal sig,rxs skirt "be charged;fothe eelor: "1ts The s i7 a sht'11 be allowed unti'I subdivtsion3 is said out or, in be base-bf a'l 'asing a!`�`i: �, until 90 percent of the u ats lsaue been iialse.d'ar ttatad, 'xN This section sha11 not be cons;treed as to pro'nibit the developers wit#in a Planned Cocamunity frets pafticjpating w in the off-situ subdivision` sign programle�enEed and installed Waugh the 'BuIldUg ind,; Association Signs may also be used to lean people to non-coemerclal `. coffmnizy facilities, such as parks and public schools. j ,t 5 k RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLOT412N OF, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENIl�1MENT TO TITLE lt,'OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PtRTAINIHG TO SIGNS WO&REAS, on the 26th day of August, 1947, the Planning Commissio held ' a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code, SECtION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comrission has found that this pro ec w hot create a significant adverse impact on thc�--;nvironmen`c and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaratian on August 26,, 1987. NOW, THERFFOAE, BE IT RESOLVED. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65856 of the Califor 4a Governmenti Code, tho the Planning Commission of the City of Ranch;;Cucamonga hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt a the attached Ordinance amending Title 14 of the Ranch Cuoamonga Municipal Code. 2. That a Certified Copy of this ReW; Lion and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. II APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry ie -, Chairman ATTEST: Brad u er. epu cre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of .Rancho Cucamonge, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of August, 1987 by the followring vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CCWXSSIONERS: ,VSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 3 v , ORDINANCE NO. 309-A AN ORDINANCE Gr f'v CITY COUR'CIL OF THE CITY OF RMHO CUCAMONO& CALI,P&;I& MiNb IO TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO f'UCA6lONCrA 1MiNso, AI CODE pERIAINING TO SIGNS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga-does ordain as t i oilows: SECTION! I Section 14.20.066, of Chapter 14.20, of Title 14, of the Rancho Cuca el'pal Code is hereby repealed and re-enacted t� read, in words and figures, as Follows: '14.20.065 Per* teed signs—Off-site subdivision directional signs within Planne oaepun, y; e o o ng emparary si gns may a perm. e w n any p anne ommunity, which was established pursuant to Section 17.14.020, subject to the prdvisio*s listed:. "A.. The developer of a planned tomaunity shall submit a( sign 0rocram for leading customers to the site within the planned community to the Planning Conanssian fior review and approval. ' Said grogram shall inclade the detailed design and placement of each sign structure. Signs shall be located within the boundaries of the Planner! Community, except said signs shall not be located`on perimeter streets to ,.; the Planned Community. "O. ;Signs shall be no'larger than sixty inches by ten - iP<hes and shall be grouped on a fove-sided sign structure as shown in.Exhibit "A". The top header board shall identify the planned community, Further, each sign way only contain the name of the subdivision, and a directional arrow as ska*m on Exhibit "A°; except as otherwise provided for herein. "C. Signs placed on private property shall be done with written consent of the property owner and filed with the Department of Community Development prior to issuance of permit. Signs in the public right-of- way shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of the sign permit. "D. There shall be no additions, tag signs; streamers, devices, display boards, or appurtenances added to the sign as origina,ly ;+proved. Further, no other directional signinfmay be used such as posters, sandwich signs, or trailer signs. Pa • U .S- di "na oesd witMh I a sudbdvit4on r ectioid ai�hsl-p$Aal oO go ain .ques r ,st be resoved°prow to i°sruae of a� t��rr s«grr poste t "p. A ar:e u ced-ab1 tar c4shA 1pos t skull b�placed wfizttr'tTt, 1+ to sure c,� i f-a'►iee w,i, i s iry��tl� dui _ eed a it to �e,props a''iliis�si ale 6e �, Eby the and stlie f cash of r�osle idea from the depusixC, i+l ds i i arl coy �ttwf d by tts'o-City re ►thtirig� eova of 4.l)aai sfgnnil chargdd to,the � �opei ' "G.. The p sh l be kl�om. until ubdf l on is old out or fin # e gate-of teas�ty o,M- ,until 6 percent of a otts hawk been ua"d or renter. "H. This section,shall not be owistrued as to prohibit, the devel o�e rs wi thi:n a planned Comwo ty :from partfapa;,i19- Yn je off site s-, viS+6A sign f program W-�'1e, 'n:ed and, installed shrou.gti the i Building Ild'dis,triaT ASsortition.-,(BIA) - 1 "I. Signs may also be used to load' people to awn- commercUl community facilities„ such as parks and pumic schools. SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been rev ewe n.compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act` of 1970 and hereby concurs with°that Negative Uelaration posted with respect to the project.. SECTION 3.. The Mayoo shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause-We same to be published wiithin fifteen (15) days after its _ passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n r o,'talifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California m, rl ,S f .. a .. r r,t -'Sl-,.HAD. OW RUN it Y i r _ 'ire t c -- — CITY OF RANCHO Q-Ty `..CONGA $TAFF REPORT 7 a G > s 'PATE: August 26, 1987 I TO Chairman and ?embers of the Planning Comni.ssior► � FROG: Brad BulIer,,_City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 13475 DESION REII€W - WDS DEVELOPMENT - Design rev pit Q u Og �.e a�;cns an p at p ans or a previously approved tract consisting of 29 single family ' lots an_7_:..94, acres of land in the Lah',Density Residential Df:,1r et (2=4 dwelling units per acre), located. on the east side of Ramona. Avenue, ninth, of Church Street APN: 1077-301-38. Associated with'Zhis project is Tree Removal Permit 87-30 requesting the removal,,of the four (4) existing Eucalyptus Windrows. 1 1. ,",PROJECT ,AND SITE DESCRIPTION. A. Action_Requested: Approval of buiidin ._elevations and plot s p anT�s ani ee emovai Permit 87-30. B. Project Density;. 3.65 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land 0e and xonir. ; or - ., ng a family'resi al, Low Density Residential 4,2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single family residential, Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling unit-; per acre) ZZ:4 Single family residential, Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Single family residential, Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. uenerai Plan Designations: rojec Site ow DerNity Residential (2-4 dwel'iing urn per acre) North - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units 'i.'ar acre) South - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acres East Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Ah 1 _ ITEM L y'' PLANNOro Ct ' 475 (D6ISa QF�• STAFF REPORT TT 13R( - DS°t2+kel apment Auqu3t 26. 196:; Page 2 a C. Site Characteris-tics: 'Tire site is currently vacant with a 2% c ofau;•-.orro south, There are'four Eucalyptus windrows toct_ ed on the site. Mature windrows are located along the north and east properti) boundaries, with two less mature windrows on +tte interior of the site,. one in an east-west direction and tee ocher in a north-south direction. I h ANALYSIS: A. Background: On ',ebr .ry 25, 196'1, the Planning Commission aph�g ren,+,at ve tract 13475, a tract subdivision of 29 lofts ranging in gize from 7,404 to 11,300 square feet in area. As part of the submittal for the tract, the applicant submitted a tree reRuval applir--&Mon for � hi removal of tvi6 fourth (4) Eucalyptus Windrows. During the ptblic,hearing, several, area residents expressed their oppcaTt on to the tree:removal. The Commission felt that since no larborist report had been submitted, to address the condition of the trees and that no product type was being proposed, a comprehensive analysis of the tree removal permit could not be conducted. Therefore, tiie Planning Commission denied the ts-ee removal permit and directed she applicant to submit a new Mae removal permit application, I ac,.ompanied by an arborist's report, at the time of des gn review for the tract. B. Geq..ral. The applicant is proposing to develop_.;he tract with one single-story unit and 2 two-story units. The one-story unit will be 1,507 square feel in area. The two story units will be 1,584 and 1,528 squara feet in area. Each floor plan will have three elevations. C. Design Review tommittee: The Design Review Committee (Tolstoy, EFF sk—, l"emaa) or ginslly reviewed the proposal and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: { 1. A third floor plan with elevations 4hould be added to two floor plans initially suWitted to create greater variation in the streetscene. The additional floor plan should be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to scheduling for Planning Commission consideration. � 2. The Eucalyptus Windrows should be replaced with Eucalyptus 7 Maculai.L, eight (8) feet on center. 3. Provide window trim retail on all elevations. 4. Provide a derorative ,blcck Mall (i.e. slumpstone) around the_perimeter of the tract. r a a Rr APdu .26 opment Page 3` i S. Staff shoUM work with the applicant on finishing Yew Court With- a Will. and landscaping. On AU9U`st 6,' 1987, „the Design,- Review Committee (Emerick, Buller, Coldm".) reviewed the additional f1'eur, pl4n with et evat ons ancf repo dad approval. Tree itaMovaU As requested by the Planning Commission at their Mee nI o' he :cuagy.25, 1987, the al pl fcaafis has, provided'.a ew tree r ovs�t` perm-it applioaE gn atOOW—an ad by a-t a ai�tA, report. Thy report focuses oY� the cbnditios of the °'wiFnslrows a1 mere;the east .ane north; tract ivounda�'ies. The report ind3Zates that`a1*6i t al of the trees wa in the w windrows ��e a;,safety"hoard or pose a potential` safety:ha:iard to the area due to ;a poorly developed root system as a result of iotrot or loots eying, $asad er, Ois ioforwAtion, staff recoamends that the north and east W.ndro r be replaced with is v' gallon Eucalyptus iiicui tta at eight (8) feet m center. The two other windrows are located at the interior of the site ' one running east/west and the 'other running north/south. These trees are relatively immature and are Planted` in an info mil linear fashion ith a number of trees scattered }, throughout the area. In that these .trees are located in the approximate locations of the local streets, staff recommends that the replacement be accomplished 01rough the installation of street-gees approved by the City Planner. III. CORRESPONDENCE While the design review does n(_} require eca U ,ca on, rdinance #976 (Tree Preservatt-!:;n) requires notices to be sent to all adjacent property owners w4.In the tree.,removal is proposed in canJunctian with a development/Vproposal. 'Therefore, notices were sent to all property owners ikithin 300 feet of the site. I IV. REC"ENDATIOD. Staff recommends that the Planning Co-emission approve tFi°e elevations and plot plans and the tree removal permit for Tentat,v! .. Tract 1Z475 through adoption of the attached resolution with conditions. 3 a J. r PLAMNI, 1 ���� �'zt3 s i REPOR TT 134T5 :�q '- 4117 'Deve �rpmerYt "August 26, 1987 �' a Page 4 ; .. t IN ' n Res ully bmItt d, Br r , Cit labner BB:SK:vc o Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site/Grading Plan t Exhibit "C" - Bui dinj,Etevations Exhibit "R" - Tree Removal,Plan Resocution of Approval wf,,th Conditions i 1 i { � a "T7*s—s'x`WT j,'°y„1„r ._ _ ._.. iA 14 H ' N • r f !!!!{(4 +•mot'"w j t .. � « fil a •� \ �� .. It ••k'7t. •9 e � et a 1. xY CITY CF ITEh1: � . R M C N/1() TITLE i PI..A:NING DIVISION EXHIBIT. A SCALE- s a 'Q arf 1 T !� i7••�• YY' ~A 4' ;T. 1�1; •. �it� ,.'fit } 6 I , I�;�art=• � . �j� � I ',�.� 4 �` 17 All 21 19, It E- Y w wkti CITY OF 4W-f RANNOL� CUCANIONTGA TITI-Et- PLkNNM. DIV6If}IV EXHIPAT: � SCALE, a. z a ! x — k fil wt �Y 'M 00Y -OWL----W-mr-, ki CITE, OF T ITEM:RA:SUHO �� T � C l K'A TITLE. L5 .LYE/ PLANNING 1DWISKXV EXHIBIT. S2 SC:ALt: ' 17 4 �x { a1 �p �y oil _-{ 1'f7-k 'ri np�- '- Z P 9 A•9�t� _ 1 V anus, . y ' as9s i 1f'1• GHWt'x � mpo F del �►� � f 1 y i r /at 1 cif f= t Egli mow , ,� , (d}i►�. ., \if i I7`i�l��i � r tfi VX a « � IIII ' '�t�.'U�� ���\fit-.�:9i•■ t �r7 a4 r;y .� '-! !lllifitF Ti ""w "lt•r�..a Pa Ism it � M w z t.�, .4 t7r►. A .� -�.�. a e��ra �� r pin m It t �An Iwo MW ■phi r min, j.s 6 e r.:rairdii� J4 Illy 'Raw TI till �. MW At d d� 9: - �,� r'.. u' n a .an' a• � �pM Leo 1 34 6 � err 25 h . Y — {{ //,'��: �f a �a �••• 'A 'A i t..•AGM � r awr wr J;M�a! `I.ya,;' yr 3 + S . f{,� •a j� � .�.�,.� � .a• �J yr—^' it MELT . J iNMTH CITY - rrENI- RAW.- M CUCANIUNGA TrFLE- PLANNING DWMON EXHIBIT- 12 - SCALE- 4 'RESOLUTION NO. 7 A RESOLUT10k OF THE RAM"RO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMISSION ;.' APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 13475 LOCAIM'-ON THE EAST SIDE OF RAMONA AVlNIIE, .NORTH OF CHURCN"STREET IN THE.LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT A. Recitals. � M NOS Development has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 13475 as described in the--,title of this Use .Olution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is'eeferred to as "the application°. (ii) August `on Au 26, 1987, the `g �� %nning Commission of the City of i h Rancho CucLmunga held a meeting.to considl' Ae application. g p q p , have occurred? All ie al rere u9sitr�^�.i the adoption of this Resolution B. RC.)lution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined-and resolved?,by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as fnlaows: 1. This Cou,kcsion hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-refe"enced meeting on August 26, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed deign is in accord with the objective of'the Development Code and the pu,;oses of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable there-,o, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,- or materially injurious to properties or improvementr- „,_ he vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph .l and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition "set forth> below and in the attached Standard Conditions i attached herejo and; ineorporated herein by this reference: v' <a i (a) Planning Division `4 i. . All applicable conditions of Resolution 8725 shall apply. ii, Eucalyptus Maculata (15 gallon minimum) shall be planted at eight (8) feet on center along the east ar.d north tract boundary. - A deep ,catering system shall be provided to properly irrigate the trees. The location of the trees and method of irrigation shall be shown on the final landscape plan which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. iii. itfndow trim detail shaiT be provided around all windows. The K revised plans shall he reviewed and approved by the City Planner prier to the issuance of building permits.. t iv. A decorative block wall (i.e. slunvstone) shall be provided PE around the perimeter of the tract. Ille design and location of the wall shall be shown on the final landscape plan which is subject to review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building`oermits. v. A decorative block wall and landscaoinq :shall be provided at the west end of Yew Court. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building JUL permits. -' 4. The Deputy Secretary to this Comission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1987. PLANNING COt'ifilISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC410NGA BY- Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Depu y ecre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission`of the City aF Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby Certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, parsed, and adopted by the Planning 6a_-umission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of August, 1997, by the following vote-to-wit.- AYES, COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: V p+p yi"LLL�'YYY( RE dil nrV41' g„tp 11rY y� 'yLlk�w:...a �µ�a•s yi lull aS yH, aF' 'a 46 V q t T6l W'Y. � M A.R PIN g n— d i+.l L � xvh. Y R^ V '.. '4' a 'i4 143 Y+� �x aG4 AM Y LlNMA .... Y C �t Hit-!a. $8 75;ba J w*+�Nm +p�C 64*HY �' sgu,y. rY L aS$a'�. E � ���ya,� +�ire{,���{{y+g 4"� sy '�_ 'y�' f>>}• 4''�r{e�'+A� �S+rt s!g4 ' OOL .�.ypY _G,Q?V`pfM6 NF YMp{ Yy y 1t_C �tAN_u F tliiiY CL y�q �J NNN {M..w yN�pybMA (S C..CL MY VlV' , R�y' NNw YG \I r.VO40� b��N 44 ut Q. L i ice. if n li lki. a _ ps it IS ANN fe f �t -. CY�r7j�6. �w•�i'� n p�a �o.ic b aw.'41i� aa� '� ��` me `"'ym D.qL yry tN Y y 6 � v.Y n Y Ya .0 49i 4-N9 y6 Y°y OC+r ✓4 nq y .� A.M yC: ni , V M Vn�e eQy � �T R�bb Sf G�tis.a; �ry A\L1 Y ^q0� 4fe t^�iy�•. #i+ ��^N `=�aryL1.NyL y NMEyr. Y , �pL NO u NW L WZ4°.�Ci tlt�Y CC GY� L Apts C. u Y.� L. v Na. �x+,r, I:% °s;._.YCm" .o.� "' 5--z Cs � CrNq ✓^MV —�- �'��L L{j x�gg COS` `^ '^�'� vy°N f'''af �L' 8'C��T''�'c'�r�` ,e4 a �&^'�' �G.i+. C i _UP I i.��A `- 'VM NS Y1T -ggTi ~�N Y tom. GV CW N 666 y04: d� Mg NcOa r �qa �:�.. „ r1u' '6:: .Oy��. C �� wa�yt L,yCy� N �v.0 SCLq°6 iSN 4t it�b4..8 � \\` N igp� 'y+'C�I. �Ny �2:��QY �,: :�� CW 6� f._. OI�Sf ��y� 6`ppN N. �� q�YL ;1�1f MY�YL. to Gz tl ^ q4 y8 M�C� V�sY GM Vw qq [q� y C +poC q+. O:� y R �` �jop�b�T� LIC p� C CYY '�aV y Sr 4 -_ V �� YYCt'O 9ZM ca73a Al $��NL'xfYYY�JJJ�� � mall�3`yy�5 y Y �e N O N_�CVf^ YYC.fc1N irL(1�y�[ q � vC ^ L T V. q61 fKii Y °" .94 i'++rs.Fz .YnhB.v` qa cc�MZ o ^ ,d fJ^ .�'1 4 u Niiisi*N 'O.6 g�M.9 �. • S NC a*« N N y .►N��O tzs �wqi AC� Y9Y gpNyyyg Nl �^'Tr"N` 4 �f ac•SM• y�Y� Lo IM.yc„CC �1°N6a��� ~ y -ta—O �»Y�NV �.q $ p�y��Y 2�_2 7z 4 •P 1C N `�,O+ i Q {y4�� 0.N1 0 C GyY_ 0C NHY N a :-r 9 � c fi_: `�y°.± A`O may= ewc" EY_.'"tl� •'f�' : 0-5 cO.�V..cno ' pg r L$ 4L �`q'p ILLO g4T•tY M� q. c1y�a N TTC C` qT •C9 NN oI ■y NS dG nO Wi ...a0 i` v,-�faCY1 y= 0., �M pG iC �^1.51 z�Ll D. NLY O� YC N^ C q =!+ A, yyytlg ,21 q V�ti=q6 ^Vs aL 9A �A�■ LD Ip�d OOapp^ N�4' .N:y YpNY�Y�{1� c V'a�=qOL VOYACtq. yR M'. at+L ice. ■y LV'. M�ji (11�` L�5~vCL�R�� ,! N V. cc�YgaR ' 4yYCN 6��R �V CY p YO��'1Ir.^P� CA. N9N ~OW�Np q>MML 4jyi L `G �av�V sQ cs so^! �Stl�V C 6 pC C�a�Aj py4 .c o gOuy{G� Lyyp y/ VlP Ny y�N { tU�4 Y G17�M� �peQ� Q� 3pF. <r•M1l +1t4• q.Y JY'V OiOC4Hli�,yQ y. p � J / as o�111 a Se Pu o11 9L.tl.�tnm�'q..gLxLa r '�$ ,^� q�' � co&�ioWr5� ay $ YC tlN 4F Yt Z.. qO P.�6i0�VC L GG�vq' Ca ow y^w zZ'7wW+.�� �Sku c€1 C q�Wa' C +ti oM o ark �a gvWy�a oDw„2 ak�;q X .aA aC s q 8 u u� �"^aS$ OEu.. �a. ^yC 1� N YLIJ / W �Y^ '1 N Y .C.C (y� iWi=g N A C W d + Y Y' k mL. G-1 a.vE YOWLN.dc ^ � � e< �� y -mow €yE ataa� eyC+i o4a xv �'_ 9_" +�� o {.g�'o'YY�ee�yy P'�3 o.0 x qLL�t `2 �uupCYpS MCLwa"•. WpO �• �M YZNY.,7L�NLCC 'Q: i 'AN �OOL yyiL�90v6aCq ®a�$E$ rNi■ Ti MMfCL GItI p Wy64 .Q CO Ct iQ y b I o 7a GV �a aMQ p,� PM. 5 L MLei y'V►� 141 �W'•�y y � .aNCNa Y3.r LV VLr^C qCi ♦'''SL y_a02'[ �� NMe�Lw OIgSNL � L� �1 ^ago Y L N VT.. LPYL ►MN aYp�CN_N>C^N4.r 464 3Y.Y�m w�c5` •—gig JJ q�qY>NY � L Q,`W S' Qi^NN tl^0 6C 9 9 6 ff �p ON YMtl•4 COY C�J L NM� NAQ VLy'C���{f�tlp �RY� 6 4V., L N L L ■'N L ■�I tl N� yWj���11 .y C P`�LY�w y GC y�Vi JCS.y tlC _a 6W w�S•CND <. =NO 1.Ni <NICJr w.O.T O+N qp <i�VL r 1 M t C C V T w O�_4.�c P P a 4 't.. 0 am AYv 3as. AP �N NQq>7 p N? Y 6 W.G L 6O O'PF S aT Wp p . yNj. Q. L W w Lr QL� Ash: u•C� tl.�t'1-' 1 �J'. yo + L' o y:'^q''tj ya gY $ tl Kin c��BaIF, «A• W^ e. u 9W4 -i.w WJ. �wtl. rd q�" c =N$ 2C aii NMC q ,. 3 YM M 2N. arw-N Dui N O ?�^ � �^e. P � +� M L46��ON vu -$i �o W w'+s p$N�� M. L•q �YN C WYM P� = rr• c fr ^a i�± qt M. 4' V yry w 44 L+p~ t~W.w.VC — M_�V «jO'�gsJ 4; �J nj qN 6� '. CVl a 4^4N0. y b� ` 6N .V w` cz M as t.0 'W •Na�Cr`Y,W .CA ♦ t6�� 7. t^ N�N�1. � g.'� V7 �C $�sS�° tqa _CM yW�L V�y yy� rW+ a^ P mac.. J� 6 tl..0. . Y�Y R� . e aq��n _ty• 33 _ SS_y GV yLN NM �.,n S{. Ne V67G� <M�W B.�r®.. > !pN FV.4N `U +CO rOCi �GI C <M.CYC. 4t64vlYYO. NI A. I GTC �=p Oda pYyY YY� A. 1� ' ps�3w p�. tYJ•.p. K U"; V C Cg p#c f1 a a. W , yy 3cY �sY r!� SA q 31-4 � � i:.o ,. ' �. i LgYYG at c�fY_Y T N I p 4 GG • Y wp.VG� Nu �i�W ~4U� � �Ci a19Y�.� aiyy CCuNi N Na ikit ++Y; w YO. 0.v Vp CLj' a Lpa Uq� Its Y YP ~ ^CUN O. 0 YMY wC9 Ca`� Ow V' teaµt Y_6. Ypiw� IS _ map gv+ 8$`8Y Q^C '���� »YoY YzS hoc` . L 51tj ea-0w. r 4 e S G� ,1 .YL CL +^ 11M Yfi- NYG.M Y a eL 3B X W Y..—• L L O U�w p. »w w v'N R r. -s qN yy W . { y yW Yqp. +�'l � Ct$L�• Y 0 ' HTN A 4�7 6O{p�CCQY1 ��+�, •M 0�0 � CL��'� M'LL�y��� �LY i9�O � 4 y�C t »ggg Y� N.aV�i4 TT,YUa Y4' Ow ���w is 2�asri a'va oil F_.;f A ^� 3� 3 � i C pap�� E u s� Y � pp G 11yp� Op pp 1 Y w'prS U■c �' w+e o c 6s.G C ' {ap4��11 p16 Q YCLpvp G yMI.CNL Y +S^�C Z UV.. l>.^6 mci L ''.,Y.N w�Q L NV� 9 w N^ii. M 0y L N ^a Y ^ ~ `c 3 a M �S CC Yy Y cL 1�w St. O y ' G N i u C V C O _ C w>w' �m o.�6 0� ca Lo�'Qi� TI 4�d as 4L 4p yyc� _N {a1aN �SFw� � varYi >w w• a .�N a »a€ Is L Y 6 papp N'` N. p�G CN i�(Lpa yC NNa 5, `F:p. NN awl �LL� IKE 93Oc pIp fCLA� O�jY �vwp YOc bMtp! ^�wL yYp�6 Y c NO MYL YY 4c S Y�UL& -�" NNC w{O� AwM ^ U�iiAIII i9 ppy■6 N a�TSw.i� 1� p�gr +6 W NIC w^4 3 CI i ■ C {�F a Y w �4 wan " 614 - �.A v O N CI L N C U ^ C a G� ,yH; 1 G�V��r Uo ISZ KY.4.. a�Y.L Y3N' 44Noy4:. _. al.Ti X 1 .3 Qa �' 9. c 7t�Y JL 3 �` Q O LS'iTa' CV iW'!. i0+ 0�!. c� \ i\y_ �2•. F/ �.a.- � u�v•;t•y W'� 5 e q � •��`P�c i. i � y3o� Pwa.�tT+s•e w+ 'v �' n a"za e VJ;T,Cy 1r�MiLi 1.l YC �^C `� /�j �O'.O■� \�p Y�04y. CN ]C��. S} LY Y,V{•i. w�iRp. F'• /�S•Li Wb'■ ~,�r�4MY 'M� O� �L L ~ Y.RCO �W IL LU ju is- �Yy-,1 tl� ` � wa �•• 0� y M 1 Sy�^^-z PI Wes• P.�e.r� SY.Mq VU CP _eqf _ �Y N f,�C � YQ�C� Y L i � C� w.Mpp Y 3 Mp � a J ^ V M w N Y A'�w� ap��y11 L O M OTY! A �S� d M M. Y M a dp 6 9 3.2 r>j.a .+PM�Q4~YG gQ �~ SI w eua+ � g•-„. 'aa¢�• Y� i� �'"g'4 ...5 .q� n. u,• ^ups Yq oY�. fV��� <OV VO Y1q � } V�aVM •�Vy� PyY i^. Lt6� Cpa�M ft L�Cap�.�.ayi YLZ C b >_!. ' Ov Oar r •L"W V i pPJ 00 _ LL7 yy`.��aa ow a4 Y ias� s i�.+aN op-$:C:;■: �-_— ��..F 'OW CO G ~p V Vw6a� C �'6�M � NY G2% �� •� C gay C ` q Yy•Y �i�p c Y.t'Y g�y1, ~YOwG l` yu' ytlLPO ra 2� MO1 vSvan'3W ua g .g« rJ L •'4 4. a-c .2 n Y Oc P Li�i4 y. Y s yO O.;w -IRE L a iV r % u Y 6 Y..�Y7�, ag 02 $y. �'C"S A Aw. S". cidi U V^y Z=. 42 Qw �` NS. �Y'`i�'QacL� Li. '� `►jr pY '� o."'a.$ iLFSIt— �V m to ',Op.0Y �N Z YL 383 q f p VO I� Lp� 6�• �`� � .9My.` .3WP�C ari. 01f�p {� ��VC Ye L5.�> qT yy tMtf•MyY t GpV N y, ^3Y WC^C`paQ. W�V OY 7,.�C.Ls+ Nrm VIL���Lyy 6M P��aq�Y WNtl WYV TL t77'O.E < YO107ti lV Ni f LY p M1 N1 (4� II 1_ ,�. GoOyy M� _L Y tit IiF �yQ'6Y MW O p p�y' Iy�t: F IIIIIIIIIIII����'"' W u�gg��� L�. yY;J J 4� +z, o Y � O G i Y N to L L LcNL/ i' C A�, p. .sT � �sv It ay..It o g vN gatY Y Ap & C^ —Zo % fl. �(>^G ■N MNM YOB � OIpY 4a + L� ~t y '~ � Y+4 191�' M L 014 Y Y Y L C $G'r G 4 Y g r • a� s��aYiti i� LpssY ram« mm aNaff� .pY'YYAMM a$C EB :4� ALC LL Q6�YL Svc Na iYY+ !N 6w W NL.LU a& 84 IGYp. Y �C J .,GYGCLOCCR �p'p �. wG•• Fg YW !6w n CA OI war .fir H ti � Y S 01 o` u io y wo NY uMli a q Q �qe Y C OGI.. gyp i4 _wYyp,� �N GcLC SG 4r WC a C Zov -163 f3 _yyy� Y @ > �$ ppig C^ DIY L i .p s.St G 9N ^ m G v4 N'T III V L MLj yyY�� N7 O ^C a> LCp. YKM JL�I O�eC LOB G J i, pp L � 3 Y L I{ yVy Oyu C LPL �'vV O O L L a�'o i5 p �1 � o �Yuyyy$yy� � 'uo� � .T�y�C■� N a.{4 � +piu.¢ `�.jt ``o L f6V1 pp�a y�1�Yy 7 Ola W ? \ 30 ggY 'u+ors. _ •i p� Ow� all ` I"Y I.Y. �'K�"' ap V6 L -9- O YG y VVL_� �Qu a�^ V Y.• LL a, 3� NY -,,� r9 `I Y+qq.cu zd''L eY ,.Yet gi Cap '' Lc C�YL . `p„�o It gy4Y 0CSC: pNp�sy Y �nn��i M L a® ux X.4 � C V L^ .1 ALO Q VO OX {�� tl. �aC Y�qN■ op al>f� y.L'Y iL �gW •Mj�. � M '_= Cx `ALA aLwQ �YYyG C.cC. F-. - <N �u�•i«YY,�. iYl't4".�. <i L3r�w9i.'1a+`$Ci u � M n2L.2 $oN'u Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGIL WORT STAFF R1r G n 1977 DATE: August 26, 1987 TO: Chairman ar�d Members of the Planning Commission el i;i� FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner ' BY: Nancy Fong, Associatei Planner SUBJECT: E RONMENTAL ASSESSRENT AND Gz ELOPMEN7 REVIEW 87.08 1'+E: - The eve opsfen o an office par consis ng"o o r 2-story buildings. totaling 250,000 square feet on 16.58 acres of land in"the Office Park District of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Towr.Center Drive APN 1011-421-06, 10, and 09. Related to this proposed project is a Tree Removal Permit 87-20, requesting the removal of two groves of Eucalyptus trees (approximately 56 trees) within the site, I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site 'plan, elevations, Tree emove erm -20, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning- North Deer CrAek—Fiooa channel, Vacant, attached single family homes; Low-Medium Rsidential District (4-8 k dwelling units per acre) South Vacant; Community Commercial District East - 'acant; Office Park District West - Virginia Dare Business Center, Brunswick/Deer Creek Shopping Center; General Commercial Distrtzt., C. General Plan Designations: rfjJect 51te - office Park District North - Low-Medium Density Residential, Medium Density Residential Soutl: - Community Commercial East - Office Park West - General Commercial D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes gently from nor o sough at approximately 2 to 3 �)ercent. Vegetation consists of native grass. Two graves. of S6'IRed Gum Eucalyptus trees exist at the northwest and southwest corners of the e which the developer is requesting ;to remolre, The ITEM M Al - - PLANNING COMISSION ST4FF REPORT DR 87-08 - WESTERN PROPERTIES August 26, 1987 Page 2 ii two- brners at Town Center Drive and Haven Avenge, and Church St�eet:. and Haven Avenue, are desigaated as secoliidary gateways to the Terra Vista Planned Community. E. _a_9 Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage e Ratio Re aq fired Provided Four 2-Story 250,000 y250 1,000 1,000 F Buildings II. ANALYSt -� A. Background: The Planning Commission, at its regular meeting of ri 987, conducted a public hearing to consider this proposed project. The Commission stated that the architecture is Indicative of re sophis,icated office park development that does not provi�{e for transition or compatibility to the residential developnLhnt to the north and a future 'community cnmmereiai to the south. r ,,e Commission stated that they court, approve the project with-�, condition that the elevations 4 -' ' revised to reflect an architectural style reminiscent of residential and su63ect to Design Review Committee review and approval. The developer disagreed with the condition.. Based upon the above analysis and determinatic), the Commission could not;make the necessary finding to support the proposed project and'directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial. On April 22, 1987, the applicant requested that the planning Commission not adopt the Resolution of Denial and stated that they would agree to revise the elevations to address the ;architectural concerns. The developer has since submitted revised elevations for Committee review. The new arChitectural scheme consists of a- tile roof, tower47;;covered arcades, plaster materials, colored ascent bands and' columns. This style of architecture would provide compatibility to the residential district to the north and the future Community Commercial shopping center to the south. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (McNiel, BlaE.es ey, rou_fTTT reviewed the revised architecture and landscape plan and recommended approval with the following conditions: t, q J� a� PLANNING COMISOON STAM REPORT f OR 87-0$- West,AN PROP 741ES C) August,26, 19.67 Page 3 / 1. That to avoid o sr cluttering the building. ;nin►aT f 2. at a 'twenty-foot 'wide lanotape paseo be provided on both sides of the driveway entrance off Haven ' Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway, while a 15-foot widf landscape paseo on one sid&fof the driveway entranres off Town Center Drive and Church Avenue woulube acceptable. r`> : The Design Review Committee at the Ftarch 19, 1907 ruing E reviewed the site plan and landscape plan and had mare the following recommendations which have been placed as conditions of approval in the Attached Resol tion: r 1. Within plazas, additional amenities such as seating areas to accommodafis_ a larger nuaber o7 employees, special pavement su6k' as brick pavers, and bollard lights should be provide4, 2. Additional street trees should be provided along Haven Avenue, Church Street, Terra Visty� parkway, and Town Center Drive. 3. All project entrances should;have specia`, landscape treab-,nt which includes multi-trunk trees, annual coi`or, and accent trees. 4. Undulating mounding up to 34 feed and/or a low screened wall with appropriate shrub massing shall be ? provided along Church ,Street, Terra Vista oark�rsr Town Center Drive and Haven Avenue to screen pi I ng areas from public view. 1 S. The triangular shaped piece of land located at the southeast corrlgr of Church Street and Haven Avenue should be landscaped as part of this development. The developer stated at the meeting that they havm- hired a landscape architectural firm-to design all gateway landscap.h,g within the 'Terra. Vista Planned Community boundary.*, 6. The intersections of Haven Avenue and Church Street, and Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive, are designated as secondary gateways into Terra Vista. Therefore, the southeast corner of Haven Menue and Church Street should receive a similar treatment to that proposed ^,r Town GenterYrive. fi PLANNING COW ISSION STAFF REAUT � DR 87-M -WESTERN PROPERTIIES" :• August 26, 1587 Page ¢ '. 7. Within parking areas, evergreen canopy shaped trees are recommended in `,ead of the Sycamore,, e Island pines, and,L q uidambar trees._ dicated or,-ib landscape plan. l 8. The developer agreed to explore the opportunity to expand landscaping into the Veer Creek Channel right- of-way (similar to Virg nia pare) to provide for additional landsct'ng. C. EnvirUmertai Ass�. Staff y has completed the environmental cheCK11st and determined that the dt",lopment of this projecE may have the fallowing adverse impacts 7 r 1. The development of this project is impacted by rord . noisy:, A noisy;study has been submitted bye?:.. - developer to provide for mitigation measures in add`•essing this adverse impact,. , according to the nl�fte study, the 65 d8 noise 'dontour which is the acceptable level based on the General Plan for office and commercial projects, is approximately,IC'_ feet away from`the centralized plaza landscape area. The noise ntudy.concluded that no mitigation is required for 4d4Cing outdoor noise, while conventional con-,tructian methods for'^the buildings would mitigate the interior noise. 2. The removal, of approximately 56 mature Eucalyptus trees is shown in Exhibit "D"• The developer will be required to plant replacement trees. With the above mitigation measures being ,conditioned and added to the development of this prclict, staff has dbtermined that there will not be significant acverse impacts in this case. If the Planning Commission concurs with staff findisigz issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order`.for the Planning Commission to approve this orojec , facts to support the following findings must be,made: 1. That the proposed project is consisterii"with the Objectives of the General Plan and the ',erra Vista Auk Alanried Community; and i J F1 r ► - Mks' .REPQRJ. DR $7-0$ - .TERM 00P RTIES _ A-I just Eq, 598 ', f 2. That the prot;oseo use, wilding design and site plan,, Cogethar wftit the rei&iiit d: conditions of approxal are in xnpt r*4ce -�3th e � of the, ap'plIcabie prov7sie�s of tfte i3 eveCo li ° Code and Terra i� .4 r Planned Qmu tn�! �: + 3- That the . proposed use, together with conditions aph1'icable thereto, w;lll not be detrimental to the �) public 'heeth, safety or welfare, ''o'r mateMati r �C:> in3uHod" tq �+roperties or, improvements in the vicinity:, t, IY. RECQMENDATTQN. Staff reci mnds that the Planning Commission dppr.Ave evMppierit Review 87-08, Tree Removal Permit 87-20 and < ? issue a Negative Declaration through adoption of the *,ttached Resolution. `- Res ull fitted, ( Cit Planner f B�if{FitE " 'r Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Map i Exhibit "8" - Site.Utilization Map Exhibit "C" -'Detailed Site Plcn _ Exhibit-"D" Cancaaptual G,radir--- Fran Exhibit "E" - Conceptual ,Lpndscipa Plan Exhibit Or - Elevations Resolution of Approval kith Conditioris r_r `! 0 a M ,5 1t �x C? �[ (GTluzAlmd?4 dW 41MRNL FVA'MVt!kj Mkr '' IA-�K$MRi 04:iA.�StidLMOA6L InT .� _ pjA.7M1 Oi CA1�B.RLI (. rw .%ra• - A��Y tom'� •`� �� �F,+�1� �'",�� � ..Z ✓' 936 Gam' i:C�12TH; CITE' OF lTGtit. -RANCHO CU'OkNj�'�'ONbA TITLE-- f � PLANNING DjYjSK).N E.\HIBIT, ' SCaL E=.__ `t `„ TAWI EL 7 . Ii 1 -. Yk t71a.Y1tY D+liAlltlgP'Y7tA:VOkU '+'� r,r ( i RAkCCi iAMNai!"J1Mr AM Atoto"Colt 4' � % fir, �?�. -'•'� r,.,. CMt 141811"vowyAta frr YAC&"twaaew ~ ff a7WYAiD j'S✓� d 1ftlt,CANY�WIYv9 a'ti4taaa •+.r,� tp AML CITY OF RANCHO TIMS PLANNING C Dl '1 IC}` 1 V � EXHIBIT : �.. air C.• �N .�' inxis 41 y +• 'S�NS/^ _ Y 1 It X e \ _ 'Awl, All — v p Qi 16 .� E� ra` so =1 r j �1 •At � • ' ,Ir M' - +9 " r sea., �• ,\. l. i ., r r• �s Q t7 � 4i It ��. � ",` •— �. � '•+J /"" �''�/\"� '`:a'?j}� Sri`�J�i g+� ,.,, a3 i'r `47i, tY IBM P :ham � � � •-�,� C •'�sec� o � n� i�• V I ( i b S s i 4 3 T ` Ti t i R , ��-� _ •-..��•-- LLB � D �:� 44; Y 4 � 3 o M M .1 l � , ct 4 i-/ Rai r 4. ,yl SECTION a Mintz,PaMq,PKX40LA wr.v.Aw cilly 9, -7t---- P ,_ E. �" �y 9 �c 77�- - 5u r eft .� 2ou+ �..:_ aW «:..._• .m �..r....�� i .. R w. 1 Iy—I�SI1! 1 h:."C.- ` ter► i E � o P �� �' _ ,�� �+ S�IW��C7i�4 .., v.. - «F� "- � !��-;... 'r°ay°sa`pylitFd.�►. t �� 'RW�1PIiy0t, ._ _.. _ <. 5� -.�. r ' �_� ` F r� . ' .tt..� � i �� �� � � a r�- EEE ,� � y �x � � � # i/ _ F ti � � � ,��, �� ��-= � ��; �e { .. 9 2 �'�� i 1 a f�, i 1, � ,.�.�t - � � � 1 _. E ' � y G `� 1. { � //��� �� �.I 1� � .. _� ' 4 1 t - � • �� + M 1 � ` {{ x� W � i �' , 11 �� i � '�+� ..,w+�+rw.r T r stl. 117 rd -. . Ana �f ♦�I A � awl - �: a• � rr jr, It-gal 414 a �9 i wig —_ 1 a=• ME ' 1 it .t r: h ti ti .. a.. u,�r�9 44 `4 �q `. } `' f f 111 '• c� � r r r. _ RESOLUT*ON N0, i A RES-00TION OF THE RAWHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COtMMISSION APPROZ G DEVELOPMENT' R£1d1W NO. 87-08, THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN OFFICE PARK CONSISTING OF FOUR TWO-STORY BUILDINGS ` TOTALING 250,000 SOUAAE FEET ON 16.58 :dRES OF LAND l 1 LOCATED AT THE NORTHkW CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TOWN CENTER 'DRIVE IN THE OFFICE PARK DISTRICT - APR 1111-421. 06, 10, and 09 P. Recitals. ; (i) Western Properties has filed an application for the approval of E Development Review No.' 87-08 a-.': described in'the title of Resolution. Herei-iafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Reviel.' request is re erred to as °the appticat?on" (ii) Oi the 2f h of August, 1987, the Planning rComRissioa ^if' the - Ci _? of Rancho Cucamong?t, cohducted a duly noticed public meeting on the application and cone-uded,said hearing on that date. (ill) All legal prerequisites to the ado;tton of this Resolution have- recurred. B. Resolution. 104, THEREFORE, it is hereby four mnined and resnlved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho C _.,ainga as follows: 1. This Cbmmi_vsion her^by specifically finds tha4- all of the facts set forth in the Relitals, ?art A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based tipon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above�rxferenced public meeting on August 26, 1987, including written and 0,:J ,,#off —.ports, , tuge0er with ,%ublic restimoily, this Comission 5ereby finds as follows; 'a) The :application applies to property bounded by Haven Avenue, Ttem Center DriNe, Ter Fa vista, Parkway and Church Stre.*, presently unimproved; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is resider=sal, th�� property to She south of that site consists cf unimpt'ov.d { lane the prjperty to the 'east is unimproved J>ano, and tie property to the w.t Ia a basfness part, and shopping center, r, UP09 the substantial evidence pt'esented to,th's Commission dur,r. public hearing and upon the specific findings of ' facts se 'graph 1 ana 2 above, this Commission tireby firda and concludes _ I M-! r; PLANNT* GON iTSSYt N AMWLi1TTOp .NO. DR 8748 4EST50.PROPERTlF5 ` i( August 26, I987 /T - Page 2 1f %/ AWL (a') That.-the proposed project is consistent'with �( the obJectiVl.� of the General Plan; and 1 fibl That t�e proposed use `is in accord w Ttih the, t 1 objective of the Tern' Vista PlannedCommunitl�y and the-purposes pf the distrft.t„in which the site' is located, and �a (c) That 1fi2 proposed use"s in ` apiiance with enh of the applI cabl a pMovi lions of thr Development Me .and Terra Vista PIanned, Community; ad 1, (d) th4t the Wirosed use, together with the Conditions 4,Vplicable theO,, to, wi`l be detrimental ;_�)the publie health, safety, or welfare, a*s"6ater3aily S83urious to properties or improvetikirts, fn the.rfcinityr. 4. This- .omnissiov hereby finds and ce ifiez that the pro c i s been reviewed-'and considered in compiiarrpe with"the Ca-lifornia Environs al Q!Fali yy Act- of... 1970 and, furthpi, thli;'Commissior+ hereby jtsues a Nolative Declaration. on the firv#nm 1 5. Saved U . , r p �._ ar1w�oncl usi-n,o, scat forth in paragraphs, 1, 2 and 3 above, this cosmiss�� herewipproves the appli,�oyion subject to,O !: each and r!vtlry condition) sF,t forth,belgw and fn the )..;tached Standard C�aiitions attached hereto zpd incorpokkted,�herei7.�Y� th1/reference. (a) Planninr�. Olyizi- �\ A 'UwcaV-f o0t wide landscape pa§eo shall be provided on both sides of `he driveway entraree off Haven Avenue ar:u;' Term Vista Parkway. IA 1546dt wide.landscaoe paseo shall be provided on one-side of driveway entrances of; xoun Center--,"eve and Church Street. ii. Within plaza, pedestrian amenities such as a i seating area to accommodate a large number of employees. Special pavement treatment such as brick pavers, bo' ard' l'ights, etc. shall be provided. iii. :Additional street trees shall be provided along Haven Avenue, Church Street, Terra Vista Parkway and;'gown C nter prive,, Rxv• "Ali pro,�Ct ent►-'les shall have -spicial landscape treatment which includes multi;-trunk trees, annual color and accent tree,. rx T PLANNIJ%:COWISSTUO RESOLUTION No. DR 87-08 - WESTER( PgOPERTIES ,a J Augist 26 1987 � Page 3 rr V. Undulating amunding ►.p. to 33s feet and/or a low screen.,wall with appropriate shrub -risings shall be provided along Church Street, Terra ra Vista Parkway, Town 0,^Pter Drive "and Haven Avenue to the satisfactiorr.,,;f the City P,;arner.;, �a vi. The intersections of Haven, Avenue and Church Street aW Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive being designated as secondary. gaewayr into Terra Vista shall have the --ame special ` treatment, vii. Within parking areas, evergreen canopy shaped trees;shall be provided. ' viii. The developer shall expand landscaping into the Deer Creek Channel right-of�-way (similar to Virginia Dare) to provide additional landscaping. A lett-er of authorization from the Ccunty Mod Control District sha*l be filed with the City. F' ix. Additional tree wells between the landscape planter ftnrs shall be o P 9. provided in order to t - comply with the code requirements of 1 tree per 3 parking spaces. x, The location aria--4esign for the 'bus shelter Khali be subject to Design Review Committee revie-v and. approval prior to installation of such bus shelter.. (b) Engineeria Division; i. The ' existing overhead utilities (te1r.- _ co►esun.cations and �lectridal, except for 66 Kv i electrical' on the project side of Haven Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on t;te south s-ae of Town Center Drive to the first 1 pole north .of Church Street, prior to public improvement acceptance .or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Partial reimbursement of one-half the City-adopted cost for undergeounding from future development a it occurs on the opposite side of the etreet is feasible from the Presently undeveloped prrierties. it Church Street, Terra Vista Parkway and Town Center Drive shall, be constructed fu1- width along the project frontages. - Parkway improvements (sidewalk and landscaping) on the opposite side of the streets may be deferred until development of the adjacent property. �1 r PLANNING NG OiOh1�tI SIQ � i}`t`Lt1N IIQ. IC ,- NW DR 87-OP _ was �" P rz s 6` August 2� , 1987 Pige 4 l; _ iii. `ihe, potion of Master Plan Storm:Drain L:'no i frog-'Dom Creek Channel to the east side.of Haven; Itvenue shall be constructed or an �) alternate Method of drainage disposal'" "rnvided as approved by the City" Engineer, The lj ( alternate 3wEhd shall a designed and approved by the City En-1 er prior to the issuance of :bu��iling and gr ding permits. iv. Notice of intention .to firs 3ndror join the lighting and landscaping ,district shall be filed' with the City ,.Council prior to recordation of the plop-'or of building permits, whichever occurs•first. 6; The Deputy; Secretary to'this'' adoption of this Resolution. li3xeaissan strati certify to the k APPOVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TN DAY QP AuGu r,. 1997, PLANNING COMMISSION QF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMoNGA. Larry WNW, c FaMm-3n - ATTEST. ra Buller, Deputy,,Secre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly intraduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comnissir-n of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,.at a ttgular meetin'q of the Planning Comission held on the 26th day of August, 1987, uy the following vgte-to-wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: NOES: CWSSIONERs - ASSENT: COWIS-SIGNERS: 1 iG^Mrd 'yci«asi. 4Aai, if rut au oa gil.-�'' CK i9 '^;mom . ti t S > q ya,� 1g r3 x.V� rwg K� b. V4 GM q�Yay� yyw iCf p��r �9q a Ca N� �} all li��i A p KRd 111 9w�rp �.R{. y fi�, Y. wY7+pN.sssx��t rq MporGa -qY � w c V4M d ;$ SIuJ� 1�. rt A - _ A� L�+�..Y� '0 �w CYMw ^Y�s' eyt C®RA {H{.. u LL«9.tlySS„wtt .:A HY f./ + wN�y"S 4�.pp YY aQ`Qyu Y y4£fN4 aw F�U$M CL �GN 40AF A y Ci hib4 «Y� u a m g3uri 4 .3S G A Q a. -+ "�� ■ lit CV�O��O�YCOTNO Y LY wW Mw ��� i VH OCp�y3 a.. �� ou � -sY� Oi�0�y0'S.YOy VLK.iS C Yi� � �N^M T�•N p � Y V N Y `{Q.« Y O. V�`-'� V � M w A r `O ,! �L�.O .yu Qp C.�y UIY q -.013G..4i 4 Z Gn 'SG 'Zi�L^pper LGW C T�L . � '�•4att Sa' a n�zYLdu� N�H• �a�4 �� i so v uT� T uL «.-N''5 Mx.Y'" o �T,'u.s x4f._. 4 4�i"s v"ci yc *..•.r « AY �Y+e� Ya:srw eS`_«tLia��S� V. j O � Ly.V.r6 u.. pgMi YE H g"„0,�.`,.'tli �q ue'"ea EO.aF� cw cY�� .yx�La _' g er�ue1'.S y� J;` +x'i6va+ N C LAM M �ooi YCN■ �N��aaa ^w+ O.�CC'�9 ,315Z .My L'N N Y^�� ..qA A S K V�7. CV�~ ��S.1�29N w{tl�.4., CtlppC §Y L� �� W> P elf i.Ca tVY L �� �.'�WC�QY VM1y �[ 3+y�CC.M yyr~. � SL t}rr�Jji �4■G■ • jl }.- H C GO OQ pit 1C4�Y.; 4 V+L w•VY'y pO iY M My�d V R u*s� q i r..L r: ut O R�L �.f�6 �`MG,t VI�+p NL� M it t� 9 � � y?..�i � iSID LL. a�a0 1Yifd J c yR�v�yy"+: -Coo�,Y OT «N Mena r� Y O ~W .- +•Ly® bu. N. o angy .L.�YY «S4 ,•,'� ,+'"wr.. p .' y�'�9CL` nY q�.�^v �Ny pG N Cc`y H� qw ^�OyC �V�eeZ ppN��LOL>v,n9,auy.� �C4 �Y W� b CO .y�.G.w • r p y� pL � C ,G ^EN� LV NJ �o E.C. G.YYL ~+'���+ q~9� m {wpy� N0Cbx� iMl'r� G �p 7.Y w +�+ -Sc C '.N� �.YpLL Y lit .rT.i 1Vg .:Cb$ 3 .. c. ppgA� V.a' GOppw��. G®4pla - M�VG9y V.GyGjVEG �0�� J, .� .. .t�Ri7 Ac 9'J''�C.iyw. S$ffLCC d.+y �wf+'•,��gs+.^bVb��pp OCpY6�Y'mmN�V9I.V"0iP seO .NN -ne O ViC Yr A.Oia:yCLa, -. HL�O Tc Z. �J� C q � r�. •VL�i..V.0 N� a VYa�4 CCM^y�q ,. �0��� YP p�� ■��O HWt��j2 l o •. i ' SizL N a4� LVgYC W� s LqR G Nq�H.MfJ YeLe OV n gA^ r C�Osfyy�. Y4 ty _ .V.N9d4 O iC9Nf Oai�cs c- GYL ti_ VV' x � Y6a n01 yQ�sYy A'V�J `^J fEp s�Sb.. (v�� ...gL EG ` J I�.L`MT ND ^N� v/4i 6i! /N® YWfHhw FMML4 ,/+�7<6L ' = rR cX $ 8�f s$oas~ry �wy."S .ct,� " Liv N $ ro uaQrrs&�MfrS1~[..`. °YYtR�� i 4 WN Y y.Qe9 �O 'fr�¢1gvvCL CC`VA �V vY + � m z tls ' tl .u.a uA$ wowN� ayE .FJ, s� � iI u. e,o wee�y a Y N�Q»� 3N VT „� a.� O ro! rQ• Jt ``~ CL uJw 3j tlf:,Q N N O hV a'RfaSv . dYy 'O+�a.G» 44 xas- q•tlR i Y Mh Gc FS ,tea I»g� ivc.4 p. y uYa qi ~�lNy� .� ,_• LC N. .51 � a Cti yam.+ 'i tS,p,WV'Q _Q y �IC�un YqY. •I 44¢i p a + V u a� v � y .�v 7ii$O w ro► »��It.'+; % tl� -3 1 D.1 Al: 34Q V. ;ffyi t'v y 0 H.ya=YYUN -2j;! KrB A".,1flj 1tN Mai 7^4 �€.�$sB.µE Srw A 4 i 'g O N�.. YVYLLW.D G^M Cw+ CN'My(t}TMyN • � NpF. �2� yN � 1� $V4 .f: ' Sn"N•*Sa iNNn O.�A' Q L 1 94 iMS*V ■N JY a7�Q" tlNU NO «6uVf.`i�4C..s ."Ya �N S4' Ly0 l"^ S. H wpi. b <M w :t.N 4' H M Z K N y tiyp q C L9�fMOsO Ctl�94 S 1L V. N M �_� as x Ga� �,—sit 6.13 ' yN }i{'�tl.y.tl � Cb N n ppp..N �sE }pYYNp� V��G YY xq.. 6Yy L.a 9 .. _CLVAM _M y Y qtl ciM ,Im S tC ��jy yy c �• g q .w y�t�. _��C t+sw wN 5tl ! + N3C `' 1 L f . V ro p V C.O u R f N � yy { y Wa 'y��av y ssB' � Y DD w" yyW Y a s M p py QL.tl.S a~ O M i�.pi O MN fir. C i W yes .-iQ w� �An� N �V•C � iA yN VyL4 w+f. Jga?wNV NCcy /�Q Gnw�� �Yy�4f Qq. i ! hS i. _`� N� SpIY�.V -V .,SAC L 4HL® �'L+ A4.,?.a 9L' / 'V+.y!]v+ mY ,C4_7.Z.. .4 L K�'n0 Y7M� Y KbH H� 6 ^►.OC� %y �[ y{�tliY�nq Y di C m i (I Il ■54X Y0.6 $O�VP., AYY�� Y)JIGLN AY,. Y S�'N• 1'� GNp6 !I CtyL y2, 2C■CIC -NA, SOL y�.4n �y ` 72 c2 5`2 3 'a,�.0 Y n'u' CA . W x3, ca$ cam , $:.� S8 Ap N V ; Ad Y �. a •L. A•Y p. ,�L,,QGG N SEN Y Y Y Y 43 CNY VM ON H z92 viIGI �L .�•' oafdvi-'�.�. V)�ai +q O. ,iY? ' _. _d, W .ip' NY N~N 6i4 X1%?v YVOM' Y Pj�^IE4--m �SIY.'y Y s � 1 e 3' �Q G 2� g� c am€= ^}}AIIF ".,d-Y 5v�+1 V*9.5lz aro12 n �w N.ii " Yp.^Qta'MGq. 'M7.$IIY?nyI 6C=VU raVS V.fQOy pVXOSppL ,a V+O MNp1VQ WYNwO C_- J^i Y. Y OY.Yy• Y M OptV n�GnI A tYi yT NN yr p 4 A. T�C N �. ` Y O W G N�Y. N■�p.G 0-j! g— V O 4c Yy N,S io3 RI T^T Y N.y^ Y L.� C aLGY `LaaigCqi�� A�NEp,q ^CQ � ��$� bG�Y��39• $..��.� A V �L•S 9ON� 6CCO N` yyv.Q,Yi ,,CCtlG�Ode I t Q`L3•yf( �yM�L N M �L'O ��V9 F•Q'� �T 4S Yl� h•- YO�Y Y ,G CCN ON A Ly� bi Y . V^. _ F.:it1 HMRKO 1.54V0 N N 0it� ' Y N • pp y ppaa 'a 7 C AA A� V Nft yxA C� �0 G.`ZC aA 1 G 4 A" igt{,�� 9 'pjC YNr y 36fC� C yV Y„NV•,6 wN aypt Yyq Y�1. �+ Y�Lc Ya AS6 L CfL «. Aw V.nr. y t G N LO L a^6i L` •�S�.�N• N Y.G i S n� �Y 2^IS V[ppC 3g"S _ 3�57 g N yy y a RE .rN t � 4 $LA ;In C� tlq N LL IY.e. 6p A+. C� Q3Y 6 .. �C..F �pV' _ �yX 6 S V A� ,yy al"' pa"ucai T` yt' Q« Yi '�3.C. S..ncc`.NCC y IC N i N A L e n i 4 ^y,a .D r' O�A y G a .egg Ic �� ..N NLvS �sn^ 5 3 . 6fMve Gt•OA • � 6ttt Y�n O�OtCe � fN.�• C6py�M NN f�~ 7Y�1'. yr•^ u C ,�[.Nf• M�pz Y C� S L y •Y a L t YYY y~ O�M+� 'Sq S C i V G S.X. # �" M _� INN; aY VL Y e ' a=p yN 4 p�1AM q CII G IG p� OP. �5,t6 usli .s L 'tl Y • .N� C �VG C �6f L ON~- 4 V. Vim' LND p p $may y pp ,,��..��..��ryry by yi SO'w�^4 aYi C�.92tL I.�■ 0��: ►=��1 IC^ �LYIog N�4' V N N��MMMM�^` C01K Mv. N� 'Y C6P.�G V L*+¢ L^ I! LLNY ANL ♦r L` L6 -0N OA LWY Y g 1-Y.S M i •'lls dL�� <. �4.:-A`.G. �i Ci OV YM ate• C Y■i ti ■NI i.Waa ty M P'1 Wag AR T. �p i $y tl ('2 uS tc 11 f' s y VyVLO L M�OpV: Yy y Mai `\\ C G� � A V \ Q N s Q 7H=tl L wo� �.�.o Bay 4� N=�a ?�,3 p Ng°E. ys tic 2 9 $ a ~ Sii Na��tip� y ^Cv aV 4 4 F pw N. iN1�G�T :fig�K1.. 4i as pp a `a 'L N.�.-pn tea,. a4 s ap ^ 4 qC tj C. Y p0�. q�t; if CL �� r_ + yT LY q �! �^a dnw f!l!gqJJi"y°G+.V p � lips 5 9yq� 6MM• 'u Z2. lLOI �q�y}� v. � .,SOY Y0611 • tg1, 9M V� Y_ `C 1j L ate Y Y JC 7 M �y tlV1� Lg9 p Cps `Ow+tlpu Ye ?tv G� u, ac s e tl p p sSQ ty� 2 C IgV. }ytM 04q Y �`p CYV O,y C3Y •�L � CIV 6 Q V J V w A4L. S �lP1�C Y `! O,Ip'p.r ^C 7 �pT SQL. tl u 'L V Y,�n yo„ Mao Lu all %a Z.= -19 - 1& o N,2..» V q 'its w�qYNOk Yi xv OrSO M ►�Mp � M L L, T a :—' Y g _ �� 3q: _w a o u yV Vto N Y CT Ytly ,�, CCE.rs 4 •� T at q 0. ~ 6 6 Lw M p.:: Lyy it 5 1! 4' W VU O. O OTL � 4 � I i ktt t: ,.. mp, 4t YY , uj q N C��t '^ 'i'M Y>N6 �G G pY p �Y }i ao ul y1�U`". G`� O.y. gMy�V 6<a'� Ny �YY� ' ui taISEY ON` S .gyp A H, ... ax G Li Qa CiL OMY 4tl s=•4 O� 6i �.Y^ .may "aN� LL `rdf .. «.� pJE'yn r�u t► &A $ Zy,: �e �, e�rcca.,. Yg �jG�1,Y �Y CY yY^LL■ y YY Y q ^Y � a� _ NV�^. ■„ iy� r.� Mt�-'.V'1gN pY te. Mtl M� �a LOF �. ye�g�. O y��p6 �pN� �O�ap HC' Lv� <4i aY` WKML�9 t.1 � id0 <L � +Y� C tl • o•♦ Q g 0 S t IV- EN CL 'Y Y yyQ�y5 ' 4..Lp. ..N�Ltl CYt. M"N yqW. � Y++A '"yqy` � .d^..� �Y♦♦•..V• YY~CN.�G. wM tG �Y G L�O MCG YC < 9`.,� E A CtlGL Y iq :SZZ Y _. o:,$ oopa:..� Y•. 4 NO6. '�� ',^ '� .: 11 yam' . LYY qLN-z �Y 53 J. r�C Y� per. tlC^N.n oN aM ._y�Q�O Y'pd6Ri Y � (Y�tCCll CW^,GM 9 SA IT Lp GV p Ket�- ��gqC4ttt N V N L�tl J�^•M l � N�� .��tgCqyy. {�Yt!l��,rF G�,L LVO pMp y:'OLOcpC tlAi O L Lr �EIIm kill; t4, GW O N w ti 1 l i :2 12 yam` O„ +� nor �A .. cq ` h 94 Y`O YM �iit� i sib$ 2 f'nH L V yyRM A� ti 010 C b Y v N O O ywy a '$ 5E N Y�• , o` Ear 83 i oi12 '' 2 _ Y :1 €YE o u = N c� wr�r J433$ sYy a w0 o.c.. .art w sS M Y` q�ggctt.• S N }P.. i a 4.j,� N G t j 2 in 60 rI� L G32. _9L l �+T� yp�.._ } �tsl�' t �e{+T jam,{ y,�.^�-y7�, �-± i.•�5 a 1:tf(� r'LJ �v ?' '�q+[ 'L',.7I''(J�tJ�,i..1=TkS..J1�\J y�, r +� UM '� UATF Augu t W, 1 87 1177 _ tt T'O: Planning Commission 1 Alan Warrens Associate Planher ; S1Jt'sJECI: Foothill Blvd. ecific Pi tt and General Plan Ames dment i:R , 2n-nts and Responses ' Attached are ommerov,'to the subject EIR which were mceivva after an writ�Ing of the .taff report. Included are tie EIR Consultant's-responses toil ese cCfrxrrenus for Planning Comission cons��derz%ti�n for incorporatiom Lito the figal.em i`r eatal, deternratian. Staff reranrmend5; tfi3t thr Planning Carranissan.;fiind thine responses adequatz in addressing the concerns, ro r i P F ;1,,1 OF yens a7.2�rrDOM ' DATE: August 2&, 1997 : To; Alan Warren, City of:>3anrho Cucamonga FROM: Eric Norris RE: Respoi:Ees to Comments Received on Second. Circulation ! of Foothill Specific Plain Draft Elk The following are synopses of Our proposed responses to comments received on thq,, second circulate Draft EIR for the Foothill Boulevard SpecItic Plan.- Department of Transportation, June 22, 1987 ti Response,-. to comments contained in thizse'letter were addressed through revisions to the first circulated vers1on of xhe Draft EXR, No turther „revisions are necessary. J Denertment -f Transportetsdn. +gust 1A. 19A Cciewent: An identified transportation corridor lies within the vicinity of the proposed `project which shotiilc brs set aside and dedicated for possible use as a tra%isportation facility. Response: The transportation'corridor referred to Is the fature alignment of`'the Foothill Freeway (Routk 30), 'rich iQ identified In the Cityts general -plan. This tyrridor is outsidei the study '-%rea' and will not be -Affected by the proposed project. Califo._;ia Regional Water ouality Control Board.:,? Santa ion,,August 17, 1987 Comment: The Rf�OCB recommends that indirx .ci ial In trial Use " developed within the ae4scly area subjected to spe ,;"ic rev )w to `cdetermine `hsir po 'ential water , q► ,lity impacts and to formulate ,bite-specific m tigation measur1ss, where necessary. Laqd Ptanrffog and Qesgn •-:__h i Anaaysis fn�ironme�al5tud+es+?rgier4 Ma��emecrt L 2940 East G Street.S*wh i'459,0,ntario,,CA 9t 76A • (7-4)94-5-273a i d h tl a✓w%4 a w YY * Xn �➢ ^y_§Z 4 'fit Yr' C1 't J. r; AY,AN WARREN a AUGUST 26, 1987 _E 2 r r,' Response- Ae following mitigation measure should be added t; to the Draft EIR: "-- All industrial uses developed within, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area shall be raviewed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Regional Water Quality Control Board to determine their potential to impact groundwater quality (through materiel spills, runoff of paved areas, use of potentially 'harmful materials, € etc..). Where necessary, implementation of measures to reduce potential imp-Icts to acceptable levels shall be is required prior to issuance of building permits or r` certificates of occupancy." Comment: Although sufficient treatment plant capacity to serve proposed study area development will be available upon completion of proposed CBMWD treatment plant RP-4 (proposed to bc;on line by 1995), problems -.,ay arise if this plant is ;' available. Proper seraicing and-? disposal of th`, 'project's wastewater would need to be re-evaluated. Response: Pomment noted. Review of wastewater disposal strategies for the City of Rancho Cucamonga will, be undertaken, 'shcuuld construction of RP-4 be delayed or abandoned. _ The Resources Agency of California Division of Mines and Geology, August 17, 1987 Comment: The Divisirn of Mines and Geology has classified much of the lant.-`within the project area as containing significant deposits of aggregate resources. The Division of Mines and Geology recommends that a discussion of the mineral resource potential of the project area, as well as a discussion of the proposed project's impact on laca}1 and regional aggregate suppliQs, be added to the Final EIR. Response: Although the study area is' located in an area which contains significant aggregate deposits, rem6bval of these resources is not feasible, for the fo,.,lowIng reasons; ALA-If 'WARREN J x µ RAG t .I } .A mkJgi Sty of 'toe development' s.aking, place within the' stx�dy area V+fill consist...`C f'redevel4py&f t 'Of 111MIOVItno Uses `- 'hex e�ore; th ��s are z�. ava3la# a for oonve�rstazs ' o ra#sera ext fit an. 2y Vaccant szands ;•vi'thi4�Oe. study, areia WhJch could. earn; 1, y be used, s�or, mine�l erctraction are eiteau bo+o smnit (sing3E lints al, small parcel r l. for econ'*Ml use, or are located ad3 cent to estabiisrued re iientlal or co ime ret al areas which would be corag$t#s1E with mining operations. It should benoted that, while development of :e, pra'posexo `e,at will preclude the use of they,stuffy area for mineral extraction, currently p1nnned land ii uses also .preclude this use. in add4tion, the >_t establishment"Of mining opPpat#ons within the study area would conflict WI4Eli ` re of the primary goals of " the proposed project, is the enhancement of. the ppearance of the Foot boulevard Corridor.. Cucamoncta Cou*►tt? Water District.�.�Jerba °Comer�t J1 t; Comment• The , Draft EIR, 3n the discussirn of the potent#31 realignment of''San Diego Avenue, makes the statement that land owned by tite CCWD between San Diego Avenue anc the existing flood control channel. Is "unusable.,, t., CCWD disagrees with this conclusion. Response: The -*Tent Of the' lax�uage in the Draft EIR was not to state :it at this,land cIould betotally unusable , or that realignmeat of San Diego Avenue would totally preclude✓- all uses of. the CCWD property. However, it sould be i:Z-cognized that the shal.'„,ow depth of this psrcel will limit the uses which case conceivably ,be developed, It you have any questions regarding these proposed respoz,,N.5, please give me a call, IJ A k "x _ .,.._ erg.,„c,,,,��'tf�,a. ;i3•eoa.� ,3 .�..... ._ �.F.d_. , 'ac d „dot aiv;_:75"s.a_ mw�a+.. � �� ���" `"rt`T �'� Busihati�s>?sanxpaitas►tFt4d" ,f �rtejt�,:. � ran 'd . State cleari og.ou,se Aata _ August 14p 19V Office of Planning a Research Fib No.- 1400 10th Street 08-SBd-66 4.1 01 5ac,ramentop CA 95:814 SCH #87021:63.5 L+ Artention Peggy_ Osborn From DEPARTMtEW-OF TRANSKMA'MN District 8 Sublets Foothill Boulevard Specific; Plan and G.P.A. We have reviewed the above-ireference,.d acoument,. Enclosed is a copy of cur. initial comments which are still,valid. The Southern California Association of Governments in its l:egiar'tal Transportation Plan, ,has identified a number of futrre. transportation corridors. These corridors will be needed to help relieve congestia', especially during peak commute periods. , One of the a::ientified corridors lies in the vicinity of this ' development (see attached We request that land be set aside and dedicated for possible utie- t%s a transportation facility. We urge early and continuous liaison with Caltrans on proposed plans as they affect State highways. if you have any questions, please contact Morgan Choate at (714) 383-4233. GUY G. VISBAL Chief, Transportation Planning Branch SK:bh 91987 j. Eno. l F TaTP cc: FDHusum,Plan Coord Unit, DOTP a ' 9k }� J E T r LLJ ce M cic cr * 1 F W S W uj ® O cv or~� .,sg�ii MAR U.H Y 000042 irs a a�srry�eMtsNi gw, ss,'frarnporfa wn v:nd Agency ?+0temarandyrra To State ClearLIghouse - - _ - Dwc• -June :22, 1987 Office of Planning & Research - - 1400 10th Street Fae t4o.,08-SBd-66-4.1 - Y Sa;rame;nto, CA 9581e1 SCH;T021615 Attention Peggy Osborn From - 00-ARTMEW OF TRANSPORTATION District a submit: DETR - Foothill Boulevard Specific Plao We have reviewed the above-referenced document and. request consideration of the follcwings 1. During consttuction within St&te right of way, any lAne closure and/or traffic control should be in compliamoe with vtate standards including advance warning signs and lane tapers. ,I 2. Provide at least minimum sight distance for all vehicles entering and exiting at all access locations. 3. Provide sufficient vehicle storage in -new left-turn pockets. � 4.. ,All new traffic signal installations, including modifications I of existing signals, shall be financed by the developer. o The report does not address the primary purpose of the State highway which is to allow the motorist to traverse the facility With t*)e least inconvenience and in a safe manner.- 0 Traffic will be concentrated at the intersections shown in the conceptual plans,,so that any driver who desires;, entry to any place on the oppositw side of the street, relative to his direction of travel, . s -forced to proceed.to the next inter- section and make a "U"-turn in order to get to his - destination. j a Other concerns are with planted medians which show trees, •I lawn, etc. The trees shown will constitute a fixed object within 301 of the edge of traveled way and will, during younger stages of growth, obstruct the .vision of the driver. Haintenanae and watering will alia acid to problems for the driver. Workers in the median will be a distracting influence r and watering could cause a wet pavement conditions during dry weather which is not ,anticipated by the ordinary driver. This cou;'l cause loss of control of the vehicle. ;. Stste clear* anB a s� 1ttentidtt 1'reE Page .2 r f 1'9 87 June RE � 1. o ''Enhanced" intersectzofh shotcin•g paving b ,obk, of unknown desoription'in a- kn, wlth,i pa,,re, hs, o;t;. been ao pted' by the State &r use as a a" itUlte,#or but g present pavin matiorlats.:: 18"AA- h-as eonst time ` ixed :abjeons and would I be disa�laWed;,- o Caltrans' supports txr� z 'aI'ign,,men>t of Red'Ail I Avenue to Grove A�enu•e and 'the elaEmiz�a�i:ih og the existing ,con{nee'ticn oft: Sara Diego Auenu°e to Pssat41l Bb�letxard, is stated undies Project Alternatives. it is.'unolear as to: th4 intent of the alternatives for EsUcza .Gcurt. Eita'cl.a G;OLI t is 'an east west street as is 'nn Bernardino (toad and Fo.othill,Boul.evard. Tie would appreciate the oppor�tun ty to review and eommsnt on the . proposed DEER in order tO ev*iluate possible llmpaets to, the transportation --_ystem, particularly"Stwate Route 66. We urge early and oontinu:ous liaison with Galtrans on proposed a#''feet; State highways. plans as they . if uoa have any questions; please .contact Marie J Petry at (714) .38.3_45141. _ 1 ` Original Signed By G. V+sba6 ' GUY G. VISBAL Chief, Transportation" Planning Branoh A cc: FDHusum, Plan Coordiration c lit, DOTP Pile t21 r ; a a .Y,H.Y P•L....��; 'Ela4'.lS!-. ice.6_ .., a .. .-...r.d�" .. -... .. n 4'W �5-:l�'�f...'� �.s 1' 3 � b Dr. Gctdon Show ln.F AUgCiSt7; '1987 The Hescurres Ageno ,y, s 141E 9tW Street, 13th Fir Sacramento, CA 954� California R"ioml Watc 0.*jIEo grt�rpE�dArc��,SAni�t Ate.,�s�Ear{4 ' ssos fMOIANA wvaswvM,SUJTgX*o +rccr: DEIR: E[M6T ILL 8(2ULOARR 5F 3'F1`C AL.AN AjgD GEN ?�RH �IAPtEt4T NO. 87-0,3$ s' SCH# 87021415 ` We have reviewed the Draft Environmental I.mpa;t Paport (DEIR),8peci�Tr, Plan for this �rroject. Wei note that the project will include 55 2 acres of industrial 'Land-use. We I recommend that, individual Oeve.itvk nt proposals',be.subjected to Speciffc review of potential taker qutality itapaO.ts (and.mitigation) associated with them. This office should review these.projec#; as they arc--r6posed, in addition, we note ca page IV-K-8 that sufficient treatm � �lant!tcapacity should be available for this project at the proposed Chino basin Munic .pel Water District's (C" ) RP-4�, which is planned to be constructed and on-Sine by 1995. If probledts should*arise regarding the implementatiph or'R-p4, then proper servicing and dtsposal of this projnct's wastewater would need to be ,t re-evaluated, 1, Nancy A.'�Olson , fc Sanitary Engineering Technician ` Enclosure: State. Clearinghouse corm i* AUS 2 01987 CMARIN T cc-. Olio Krautil, City of Ran Cu � �C'ttse 'NAO:wrr ta ai3ht } 4 '? a.;�.." � .,,,st$, ' �" .va•� ..,..x�::;�. ., __ .".,�+*.. ..,.tea s.. .... .. ^"Yb.,.'�"3-..,.._i.._lm t4�» � � 4r � k+� f r• Ate,, � f 460 N.Euclid anus 460 LT Cead^C#Z9rnWt1,1,85 (714)9821,35P� 26 August 9'87, Planning Commission City of Mancha Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917Oi Honorable Members of the. Planning Commission � REF: FOOTHILL BLVD. SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONME,dTAL IMPACT REPORT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 87-03-8 The City of Up and would like to indicate its concerns with the proposed cir- culation of the Foothill Blvd. Specific Rlan._- As indicated in the Specific Plan, the proposal is to'4ealtgn Red `l)ll Drive 9 westerly to Grove Avenue. There is significant concern with the adv&s.e noise and traffic safety impacts of introducing a new collector street into`%,a es- tabl.shed Upland neighborhood. Although possibly some existing impacts or. �{oot- hill Blvd. may be alleviated, new impacts would be created on Grove Avenue, thus transfering problems from: one location to another. Traffic concerns include the sight distance for a newly created intersection,. the lack of evidence that a reduction in thru-traffic: on Red Hill Drive will occur as a consequence of the realignment, and the fact that the introduction of a major M intersection in close proximity to a sipalized intersection will likely affect the operational characteristics of that.-ti octant intersection. - Reprp-!entatives of,the City of Upland previously indicated concerns at the 22 July 1587 Planning Commission meeting. We would. therefore, like to take this opportunity to reiterate the City's concerns with the proposal for realignment of Red Hill Drive to Grove Avenue as applicable to the Environmental Impact Re- port, the Foothill Blvd. Specific Man, and the General Plan Amendment. We would request that our public testimony- from the 22 July Planiing Commission meeting be inciuded in the public record for the items referenced. 1i' _s_.. „�r .. °•..ate _ .a s► � a�sulwLia SZ;a " a4 s Planning Commissfian, Gi y Qi Rap-ho Cucamonga 26 August 1.987 Page We hope that you will mritissly consider, the City ,of Uplartdfs concerns regarding the realignment of Red Hill Drive. Respectfully, Jeffrey A. Bloom, Planing -Oir�mtor UGi 1d Planning Department JA/j ft i . t 4. 'sS:,. 1c5' 1�—�'=—=:'�,wos..=., �.�.��.�::a,..a... ..rra`. u�.y %'.@E.'9;..✓.''- .yr� s FA , J1 Auynst 25, 107 To: Planning \,OrMission ry ,. Fro,a- Alan War�,Qn' Associate Planner „+ Subject- Foothli ,l Blvd. Specific Plan and Genreal Plan Ameii4m4pt ZIR, response to commeb:esu from the State Divin. oil of Mines and Geology In addition to the'JRIR Consultant responses to the,.sttbjvot isSU4 a review of 'the January, 1987 California Surfaae Mining and R�--clamat''�ton Act(SMIMA) Designation gaps doea +trot indicatl any Regionally Significant Gostructign Aggfiega to zt Resourq,, Areas within the S'ecifc Plan project boundari<ev,. Therefore, the Speci.Eic Plan Mill not affect the resouM potential of those aa-aas Officially ^zlassifled as aggregate resources on the most recent SMARA Oesi.gnat�on Maps, c' q s r, - ' a C�Tf- F RANCHO CUCA AQNGA , 1"310RA,MUM Date: Augk- , J g8 Placining to"misSi D f *Il From: Russell1 . Maguire, City Engineer C, a By; Paul Rougeau.,, Traffit Engineer , "s. Rv Subject: Trlff`itc Rt�ort - Terra Vista Community Plan, Amendment No. 4 A traffic analys� ,was prepared for -this proposed 'rerra Vista Commantty o Phan Amenrent 0 was reviewed by the Engineering Division �r adequacy. °� �t has bein found that the analysis adequately covered all impacts of the proposed ehanges'and commented appropriately on them. The analysis shows that there would be a decrease i `�'�- amount of generated`by the portion of Terra Vista affectZ b, =,'e proposed x - amendment, so the result would he, a benefit to .traff conditions on <` streets in the area. Jl There is a feature of the amendment, the analysis of which was not Included in the scope of the traffic report, which should be noted for } further clarification by 4he applicant. The reconfiguration of tUe neighborhood commercial site dEpends on an access to Base Line Road which. may not align with a previously approved street connection on the north side of Base Line. This question should be answered prior to approval of the w-indment, since the configurations; of shopping center sites often have limited flexibility. G � a y,. ' s �'2,a.�@d:e��,.®.ti .x,.:a,,.iGds±A�t,'+�s'�.��.�n ,Ya4Zn�i't:mn.,..�.,:",`w_.A' .. ._ :�'..„ems,... ., .i ♦' V� � r� `'` ... ,,why •' a �c,: ,... , g} NE5SE15lt3ER tti1YESTMENTCO+MtPANY August 25, 1987 o y Me. Nancy Pong Associate PlannW Planning Departm6t City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320-C Baseline Read <' Rancho Cucamonga, California 91720 RE. Arrow Business Park Request for Master Conditional Use Permit 87-2$-Messenger Dear Ms. Fang; Messenger Investment Company would like .to request a continuance on the above refer$nced request for Master Conditional Use Permit to the next Planning Commission Meeting. Thank you for your assistA"Z a and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, MESSJ&GM S� ANY cot E. e t er Project M a-p SEP/Plz I 2 A Vwa KarmanAYaaue,k-eme CA 92714 714i474-1300