HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987/10/14 - Agenda Packet0701 -02 10-14 --87' PC Agenda o ;
9� r
"r 4CM OF
WMLSSM
ND
a
GE
1977 J
; c YRDNP DAY OC:IDBEtt 14,19 67 7:00
k.; 9151 BASE Lnm
R"CHO CUCXAGROA, CAMORNIA
L Pup of AHe&ace
i
Commissloner Biakeday _ Commissioner Br4eriek
Commissioner Chitiea i Com."issimer
Commissioner 71'01sto
i M Announecoments
5eptfimbsr 0, 1987
September 23, 1987
V;, C+tlender
The h1lowing Consent Calendar items are expected to be routs e and
,ion- contmversial, They will be acted on by the Cammfssion at one
bm *i_ x i0out discussfom If anyone has concern over any item, it
sh;V. ;a be removed for dlicumlon,
fi. 'i'h'VIRQ�:AdEPTTA'L ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT
IiE'llEli� 87-42 - EMFJtiE PARTi3EitS - "A prapaaal to
construct a 10,1 8 squsre foot office building op .64 acres
of land in the Industrial Pork District, Subarea 7, Lot 7 of
the Office 'Dennis Executive Center located on the north
iida of Civic Center Drive,,'metween Red Oak and Utica -
APN 208 -082 -ti$:
7
- VL POW* Uearigp
The following items are publio hearings in whui,h concerned
individuals may voice their to anion of the related project.
Please Wait to be recognized b; the Chairman and addresa the
CommhWon by statinq your name and address. All such
- opinions shalt be limited to 5 minutes per'individuai for each
project. .;
13. ENVIRONMN'TAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE
TRACT 135 - WANTON - A custom lot subdivision of
3.7 acres into S par �Fls in the Very Low Density
"
Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre),
located on the east side of 'Sapphire Street, south of
: hillside Road APN 1061 - 691 -8, 10 and 11�. (Continued
I from September 9,, 1987 meeting.)
C. I•rNTIRONMENTAI, ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE
TRACT 1372-7 - �rAK§%§L S - A residentiol subdivision of 12
single family '3-+_ on 3.53 acres of land in the Low
Residential District (2-4 dwelling uni A per acre), located
at the southwest corner of Carts lia ` Streset and HigbIsAd
Avenue - APN 201- 214 -11. (Continued f°ik[n September 23, i
1987 meeting.)
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 87-14 - GrREENVI£W ESTATES - The development
o 140 multi family unite on 10.15 acres of land in the
Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre),
located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Baker Avenue - APN 207-201-30, 41, 42 and 43. Associated
with the development is Tree Removal Permit 87-62
requesting tt—, removal of a number of trees scatte red
throughout the site. (Continued frorn),September 23,,1987
meeting.)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE
TRACT 13950 - CREENVIEW ESTATES - A. residentiel
subdivision and design review of 140 towrnhome units on
10.15 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (0-
14 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast col her
of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue - APN 207301 -30,
41, 42 and 43. Associated with the develc oment is Tree
Removal Permit 87 -62 requesting the removal of a number
of trees scattered-throughout the site. (Continued from
September 33, iu381 meeting..)
d:
t�
8.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASNOSMENT AND TT.}NTATIYE
t
TRACT T 7 2 - YYII,L3IAM LY01S 00AWANY -`A residential
=I
s0diuisfon of 120 lots on 24XF acrea of land in the Medium
9i`(4
-14 dweEing units per sc-re) and Medium-High (14-24
dwelling units per acre) Residential Districts within the
Victoria Planned Community, located at'ne,,porthwest
corner of Victoria Park Lan+: aril Milliken,. Avenue - APN
202-211-13 w4 141. (Continued from -I-'spiember 23, 19$1'
meeting.)
F.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT.
R I7 - KOFF - A ;sropasgl to construct 168
apartment units on 3 a-ce g of land in the Medium-High
Residential District (14-21 4
units per acre) .located
north of Base Line, .550 gti, least of Day Creek Channel -
APN 227-091-21- Aswei� ed with the proposal is Tree
F.en2Aval Permit 37 -67.
G.
ElnUONNENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VBSTIN(:I
'1'EN'fATTYE TRACT 13715 - WALTON CONSTRUC Z0-9' ,
.� residential subdivision and design review of 5 sing. a
family lots on 2.54 acres of land in the Ygrrv, , Low
Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per are),
located oit the north site of Jennet Street, west of Sapphire
Street , APN 1062- 011 -02.
H.
TIME EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF CONDZTYONS
OF APPROY` F'k3R PARCEL MAF $57$ - SANTA TE
DEVELOPME ' COMPANY - A divas on of,-131 acres o
land into 14 pmeels 01—an She Minimum,, " -npaet Heavy
Industrial Area (Wbarea 9), located on the, South side of
Arrow Route, east'and west of Milliken`Avenuo - APN 229-
111 23. -
L
ENVIRWIM44TAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATNE
TRArCx 13523 - AYOUB - A multi-family residential
development comprising of 9 units on .69 acres of land in
the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per
acre): located na the east side of Hellman Avenue,, 325 feet `
north of l th Street - APN 201 - 474 -12,
J.
ENVIRONPY12NTAL ASSESSMENT A2TD p- YVELOPyxT
COD AMENDMENtT 87-19 - CITY OF RANGHQ
C�Ji CAf C G - n amendment to the Development Code
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Ordinance] 211, to revise
Section 17AU40 pertaining to upgrade of pr<rking
allocation standards and to require enclosed garages for all
apartment and condominium projects; and, to revise
Section 1I.08.690 pertaining to upgrade of General Design
Guidelines � for parking areas . in multiple family
developments; and? to revise Section 17.08.040 pertaining /
to upgrade of minimum residential unit size. '
u
m.µ (J `<..r—^� F a :Y.' _ ,`r —r —r —:—»•: -.p^'t l ' =if '°'^�'°"—
i
eA ",E w , - semmument awjanem.ff
in eonj nneil�m wlxh the Palka Fmk . s RestaM=t, ioaated at
°`a
123 H*hUmd Avenue.
L. El"ERT }ANT I�ERl41lT i;7 -02 - L�8 The review of
prrrvid g .. key, live bates, cotitedy acts and dancing
in conjunetAon with the Club Hi—Brow to- be located at
10134 it?othiit Boulevatd.
a=
VIL Old Dwiam
M. CONDITIONAL USE PERirlIT 84-28 - Hi MpHHREy
TRUCKING a A review of eompfl&F6q—of the conditions o�
approval or a trucking firm and caretaker's quartsrs in an
6
existing building on 8 acres of land in the General IrOxistrial
ti
District, Subarea 8, located at 8604 Pecan Avenue, south of
Arrow highway - A -PN 229-141-08 and 220461 -24 and 26.
VM. Sew Boxiam
N. TRACT 10046 - MUESTRIAN TRAILS �- MORROW - A
request to delete a portion of a local equestrian trail
easement within a previously approved tract eonsisthig of
27 single family lots within the Very Low Residential
District (less than 2 dwelling units per aerei located on the
north side of Hillsides nod, west of Hermosa. Avenue,
O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 87-44 - INTRASTATt; FINANCIAL
DEVELOPMENT COILPORATION - A prop: sal. to ttonstruct
at 21,000 square oot bank bMa"'ing on 1.5 acres of .and in _
the industrial Park District, Haven Avenue Overlay
District, ioeAted on the i outheaat corner of Haven .Avenue
and Cl -la Center Drive - APN: ,208- 622 -36.
7S. Caumetl Referrals
P. APPEAL OF PARCEL MAP 5996 - DAVID BOWDEN -- The
appeal of the Conditions of ptoval requiring an In -'lieu
fee for the future yndergrounding of the existing overhead ; ;(
utilities for this project located on the south side of Wilson
Avenue, west of Haven Avenue - APN 201-180-59
i
i
y
�a• L �APMG WIVAN FREEWAY RIGHT -OR WAY
sTRElMgA_PB sFrBA
XY. COMMbdM B=Twft
xM ptMk4DDxM@Atx
This is ,,and phwe for the gener42 pibtic to aa&imw zhe
Comm%ssion. It7;in3 to be disawed here are those which d)D ik
dIn- .; y appw on this' -genda.
The Piam&19 Commission hss adopted Achn&dstmdj
RegAatior, that set an ii p.m. ad�t munent tiros. If items g'd
{: beyond that tame, they shaU be h� ! only w"th vle av�sent;j,' ;
the Commission.
r
SAN OWNHARI
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAfil ON ,
�1
VICINITY MAID
Fib
I,--�
Ul
i
e J
•pmall Q 111lI.N�GC
i
Q �
agai
ac' l
t
t,
IAL
.��A
itum
!
Sk •
p.
C YNlf.:
,FR
WA'I
� �+
iieii+�`
ea
she �asn
'VIC
'RIA s
SAN OWNHARI
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAfil ON ,
DATE:
i T0:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF 1?-4- ICHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
r `'`AMO�'c
9
C G
V
October 14, 1987 19`7
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission-
Grad Buller, City Planner
Chris Westman, Assistant Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -42 PARTNERS ioOf - cods ruc a $asqure o ce uilding -
on 64 acres of land in the
Industrial Park District, Subarea 7, Lot 7 of the Office
Tennis Executive Center located on the north side of Civic
Cen,zer Drive, between Red Oak and Utica - APN 208- 062 -03.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration.
B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North Common-Area, Su area 7; Indus,rial Park
South - Industrial, Subarea 7; Xndustrial Park
East Office, Subarea 7; Industrial Park
West - Vacant, Subarea 7; Industrial. Park
C. General Plan Designations-:.
Project e - n ustr a( -'park
North - Industrial Park
South - Industrial Park
East - Industrial Park
West - Industrial Park
D. Site Characteristics : The site is part of a master planned
eve opmen is vacant with no significant vegetation.
Sites north and east are fully developed while the west is
still vacant. Street improvements have been completed except
for the westerly shared access driveway.
E. Parking
Calculations:
Type
Square Parking
Number of
Spaces
Number of
Spaces
of Use
Foot Ratio
Re aired
Provided
Office
9,249 (net) 1/250
37
37
ITEM A
v
PLAW41NG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -42 - EMPIRE PARTNERS
October 14, 198
Page 2
II. ANALYSIS: _.
A. General: The project use is consistent with the General Plan
an a Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 7, and is compatible
with other projects in the surrounding area.
Upon approval of the IIlegaiive Declaration, the City Planner
will grant final approvail of the project based on
recommendations made by the Design and Technical Review
Committees.
B. Desi n Review Committee: The Committee (Blakesley, Kroutil) r'a ewe e p W-ec"io eptember
17, 1987 and forwarded it to
the Planning Commission with the following recommendations:
1. Additional landscaping should be provided to meet
ISP requirements and the conceptual master
landscape plan for the Office Tennis Executive
Center on the east and west sides of the
building, and within the landscape setback along
Civic Center Drive,
2.. The applicant should work with staff in
developing an architecturally U- .egrated seating
arrangement at the north side of the building.
8. Hardscape treatment should b,� provided which
reflects the building and its materials.
4. The sidewalk on the west side of the building
should be extended south to the public sidewalk.
S. The existing pedestrian connection to the tennis
courts on the lot north should be linked to the
proposed building from the northwest corner of
the project site to the northwest corner of the
building.
C. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and II of the Initial Study
have been comp e e an no significant impacts have been found
related to the construction of the proposed building.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS The proposed use is consistent with the
General an an n ustrial Specific Plan. The building design and
site plan, to9ether with recommended conditions of approval are in
compliance with the Industrial Specific plan and all other
appiicabie City standards.
-z
i
� LANNI ����: �:.= i2E.PCRIi
DESIEL6�'RE11 1 • 89 42 EMPIRE PARTNERS
October 14. 49.87
Page 3 „
IV. ReCOWEMDATI.ON: Staff recommends that the Planning Comission
ssoe a Negmve declaration for Development Review 87 -42.
Respectfully submitted,
City. aniRr
BB•CW:te
Attachnwits: EKhipit "A" Location flap
Exhibit "8" - Siie Plan:
Exhibit "'C" - Elevations
A-3
ll
1.
i
x�
bra �� rw¢w•L' t3� " �; t,'�� .JY' N p'. O'
_ m3 ,pC. f/ iy
G a �ii7. r o
Z t%ttsstq% .ter t v
W �� �, 1 GR PARI:
t- d 1 1 „� rrs°PO�a; ='► -d
r�3. y,,•a+�° ` „Q`-- n
I 1 1S i
' FOOTHILL tV t BtyD.
j ci
RE GIC, AL t w�t St r 1 �„ a cat tus �J W
S"tCW PPLAZA �Pe !! r
.Vic Wter
_,a CUCAMOAWA
•
KtW*U PA
W a 4b Or �I
Q n JgI{
VfM, D _ I�
ARROW ROUTE
11
r: cr
t a ZIP CODS 91730 {{ cc
tu
u
d MP Jers k#Ivd. to
a — -- —
s u s
tree II r r t
Li 11 — Ncw t _ - -� J
r• Davten
`014 zi
jj ' ° St. Dr. e
`\
trees * 11 c t
q
� yyj RANCNOCUCw71rONGA �
rn / r
crry OF, rrEM=
RAIN CL CA TITLE: r�rTYJN MAii '
F41,14K.
1�.
�J IKWT FIT TYP. 11
Tw,
TUBED
Q WALK
Ott)
's
� -r'' ' • �
..
UG"T MXLAM TYP. j {i LY�L
s z_
K]
BLUXAM
COMC. %UK
l
T Lj hti— LA46SCAIE
c`XiENTW�
IT 12' W iZ?A2
323."' TO C FXTM LPa OF AEOC
CHIC CENTER DFVVE
CITY OF CT %4.
PL ANNttoiG DFUtSIQN IMT-�'--_____ SCALE-
A- 5
i
NORTH
�V
Rspfj �R --
S _.- 1(11 it 1l:1il���� �,♦ III 1 {IN
p
11
13
DATE
To.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT 4_)
October 14, 1987 0
Chairman and Members of the Pianni9g Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESM►"'_`. AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13359 -
custom lot subdivision " `o acres o an
Into 6 parcels in the Very Low Residential District (less
than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side
of'Sapphire Street, south of Hillside Road - APH 1061 -691-
9, 10 and 11.
I. BACKGROUND: On September 9, 1987, the Planning Commission
conduct e a public hearing to receive input and testimony on the
proposed development of 6 single - family custom 101, ;,. At that time,
with the recommended condition of approval for � '."Community Trail
located along ti? ",southern tract,. boundary, fM lots within the
subdivision averaged only 21,392 square feet in area. The
Development Code requires that lots average 22,500 square feet in
area. The Planning Commission stated that the requirement of a 15
foot Community Trail was necessary to implement the Master Plan of
Trails within the Equestrian Overlay District. The Planning
Commission, however, felt that there may be sufficient
justification to consider a variance due to the amount of
improvements required with the subdivision. As a result, the
Planning Commission continued this item to allow the applicant to
file a,variance request.
Subsequently, the applicant has filed a variance request for a
reduction in the average lot size. The notice of the request,
however, was not published in the %cal newspaper ten (10) days
prior to the Plawining Commission meeting as required by State
Law. Therefore, staff recommends that this item be continued to
the October 28, 1987 Planning Commission meeting so that adequate
notification can be accomplished for the Variance request.
R"ully i ed,
BC
BB :SM:te
ITEM" a i
l± F in M
Al
CITY OF RANCHO, CUC ONG:
S'T.AFF RED" OR:'
".`'DATE: October 14, 19$7'`
TO:;:. Chairman and Mer;^ of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, C`:. ty Planner
BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: EItYIROlNlEN1AL ASMWJrr AMD TENTATIVE TRACT 13727 -
re en s:r s on o s ng a aT" rm�l'y
0 on 53 acres of land in the Low Residantial District
(2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located at tha southwest
corner of Carnelian Street and Highland Avenue - M1 201 -
214 -11. (Continued from September 23, 1987 meeting).
On September 25, 1987, the Planning 6,ji tsifm received a letter fromm the
Department of Transportatirn (CalTrans) indicating that the southern
portion of the tract war. encroaching into the existing State Fra*-Aay
right -of -way. As a result, the Tentative Tract Map will have to be
redesigned in order to resolve this right -of -war discrepancy. In that
it is not known at this time how significant the cbAnges will be, staff
recommends that this item be continued- to the November 10, 1987
meeting. This wilt allow the applicant to make the necessary r,�Wisions
to the satisfaction of Cal Trans, the Engineering Division, and the
Planning Division.
ubmitted, Planner Cit BB:SM:te
77
ITEM C
o I
1�
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � 1C.,
STAFF REPORT
October j y�
r Z
a
October 14, 1987 19777
Chairman,xnd Members of the Manning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Scott Murphy, Associate Planiser
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -14 -
aKtt,wrsta t,3ihlti - the oevelopment of 140 MU — family
units acres of laud in the :Medium Residential
�Jistrict (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at the
southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue -
APR: 207- 201 -30., 41, 42 and 43. Associated with the
development is Tree Removal Permit 87 -62 requesting the
removal of a number of trees scattered throughout the
site. (Continued from September 23, 1987 meeting.)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13650 -
a - A ReRsTffe—fflat subdivision an"a d'estgn
rev ew of ownhome units on 10.15 acres of land in the
Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per
acre), located at the southeast corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Baker Avenue - APN: 207- 201 -30, 41, 42 and
43. Associated with the development is Tree Removal
Permit 87-62 requesting the removal of a number of trees
scattered throughout the site. (Continued from September
23, 1987 meeting.)
I. BACKGROUND: On September 23, 1987, the Planning Commission
con uc e a public hearing to receive public input and to discuss
the proposed development. At that time, the Planning Commission
discussed the Tree Removal Permit a�-plication and the potential
noise impacts generated from Foothill Boulevard. The Commission
stated that the two trees recommended by the arborise for
preservation should be removed and replaced with specimen size
trees due to the poteitial of root disturbance with the
installation of the sidewalk. Also, the Planning Commission felt
that a final acoustical analysis, in addition to the preliminary
noise study or file, should be conducted prior to the issuance of
building permits to ensure that adequate noise mitigation is
achieved from Foothill Boulevard. These issues have been addressed'
ire the Resolution.
ITEM D
1�
PLANNING CESSION MOP REPORT
DR 87 -14 6reenview Estates a
TT 13650 = ilreepv ew Estates
October 14, 1487 0
Page 2
II. DRAINAGE EASiNENT•
n R-We—ap_n7Tcant had not obtained the necessary easements to
adequately drain the site, �9 potential of condemnation by the
City must be considered. The "Planning Commission does not ham the
au ;hority to comic the City to posslbte eond 'tion
pr/,.04.0ings. As a result, the Planning CommistTdn continued this
item for two weeks 'to allow the City Council to review the
condemnation in concept. On October 7, 1987, the City Council
reviewed the issue surrounding the possible condemnation in order
to obtain the necessary drainage easements. After receiving all
public input and testimony, the City Council stated that, should
condemnation D;;\ necessary, the City would initiate the appropriate
proceedings in 6rder to obtain the drainage easements.
III_. RECOWENDATION• staff recommends that the Planning Commission
conduct- a p-a c hearing to repeive all input and testimony\,,an the
proposed development. After r4geiving all !!put, staff rrcspmends
that the Planning Commission ',.,approve Deve opwnt Review $7 -14,
Tentative Tract Map 13650, Tree K-Amoval Peiait A.74Z and issue a
Neg;,tive Declaration. '
ARes ctfull ubmitted,
$rod u11er
City Planner
BB: SMt: vc
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report
Resolution of Approval for Cjvelopment Review 87 -14
Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract,13650
w,
L�
.�1
F
11
DATE:
TO
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RAN PHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 23, 1987
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller „ City Planner
Scott Nurphye Associate Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-14 -
GR Ine aevelopment of,
unTfs— 0 8.15 —acres of land in the Medium Residential
District'' (8 -14 dwelling units per acre)-, located at the
southeast corner of Foothill Boulevav-d and'ilaker Avenue -
APN 207-201-30, 41, 42 and 43. Associated with the
development is Tree Removal Permit 87-62 requestine) the
removal of a number of trees scattered throughout the
site.
ENVIRONMENTAL. __ ASSESSMENT Ak'Q TENTAriVE TRACT 13650 -
GREENV1EVV_Eb.AlJUi - A residen -
den subdivision and der- 14-n
review off_70-fo—whhome units an 10.15 acret of land in the
Medlux ReAdentlal District (8-14 dwellIng units per
acre), located 3t the solithilast corner of Foothill
Bo,.slevard and Bakrr Avenue - AA 207-201-30, 41, 42 and
43. Associat4 -1 with the development Is Tree Removal
Permit 87-62 requett;4ing the re%Njai of a number of trees
scattered theoughout the site.
I. PROJECT AP'a.SIIF DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map, site Alen,
building -elevatiohs, Tree Removal Permit, and issuance of a
Negative Declaration.
B. Project Density: 13.8 dwelling units per acre.
C. Surroundin g Land Use dl
Zonin g
or - renera 7 gom
ercial
South - NobileVoxe Park. Low-Medium Residential (4-8
dwelling units per Acre)
East ftbile Home Park; LowbMedlum Residential (4-,A,...,
dwelling units per acre) 11
West Townhomes; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units
per acre)
PLMIaw eomysii'O REPORT
DR -
89- i7i3Crst1 Efi ESTATES
Septeer 14f 23, 1987t_
Page 2
D. Genemil Plan Designations,.
F'a„ec = 9, uR! as dentiai (8-14 dwelling units per
;lrtrr - '4mierciaal
Low- Madium Residenti &.' f4 -8 dwelling units per acre)
ia�st . Law- Aiedium Residential (4.8 dwelling units per acre)
11"t - Mediena Residential (8-14 0"lling units per acre)
E. Site Characteris;tic,.s: The site slopes generally, €rom northwest
sou uaea sPR4iat4�;l► 3 percent, There is a grade
differential b*m,**n the and Foothill BeulRvard varying
€row 3 c*et to 121 feet in height. An existing single family
ho" dnd 3tveral small accessory buildings occupy the site.
5urriounding the Louse is +s smell citrus orchard and several
large trees ip€ variouo sizes and s- :ecies. The vesaining
Pontius► is c6Vered with native shrubs-, and grases.
F. Parkins Calculations:
Number u€ Umber of
Type Spaces Spaces
of Use> Required ,Provided
Two 3edroom:
Coverm! 82 82
Opeo 66 66
Thrve Bed: omw
Covered b8 116
Open 558 0
Guest 35 6i
Total 299 Sag
Ii. AFIAi.YSIS:
A. GenerAl• The applicant is p-Oposing to d €velop the site with
'1WU -`4w%m me units. The units will consist Of two and three
bedroom vnit.3 ranging in size front 938 square feet to 1,395
square. feet in area. The three- bedrom units will have an
attached two -c -r garage. The two- badroon units will have an
attached one+ cdr garage. Amenities for the project 'nclude a
recreation building, a pool, two spas. two tOt lots and four
barbecue araats.
�` /4
'd
AML
PLANNING Ct 1410' l"AFF REPORT
September T11361987 ` KEERV "IEW ESTATES
Page 3
B. De sig n
Review Committee: The Comittee (Eaersck, Blakesley,
rou
5 nd1T r-e' Mewed the project on duly 2, 1987, and
made the following recommendations:
rs
1.
The concrete areas around the pool area should be
minimized to provide more green space area.
2.
The ,sidewalk along Foothill Boulevard should'
imeander.
3.
.ill retaining galls should have decorative
treaj*6nt.
'
4.
Additional architectural detailing should be
provided around all windows.
S.
variation should be provided in the ,design of
garage doors. _.
€.
A standard design should be provided for the
Patios on the ground floor..
7.
Additional relief should be provided on all
elevations fronting Foothill Boulevard. The
relief should include architectural detailing or
the use of landscape materials..
8.
Special- &ecent landscaping should be provided at
all projecx"entries and at the corner of Foothill; "i
Boulevard and Baker Street.
9.
Special landscaping consistent with tNe Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan should be pr6'ided along
Foothill Boulevard.
10.
landscaping should be provided throughout the
site to create a unifying thee.
11.
The grading plan should be redesigned to provide
an additional 5 foot level area adjacent to
Foothill Boulevard. The revised plans should be
reviewed and approved by the Design Review
Committee prior to scheduling the project for the
Planning Commission.
PLANNING COMMISSIO' TAFF REPORT
OR 87- 14lTT13680 - ..KEEKVIEW ESTATES
8eptLAber 23, 1987
Page 4
Following the nesign Review Committee meeting, the applicant`,
revised the site plan to address the Committee's concerns. Nero'!
plans were submitted and reviewed by the Committee on August 6„`
1987. The Committee approved the revised plans V-4bject to the
following conditions:
1. Eliminate parking space numbers 74, 81, 62 and
83.
2. Shift Building II -4 south to provide-,a minimumd 10
foot landscaped area between the building and the
parking spaces to the north.
3. Relocate the trash enclosure at the southwest
corner of the site to elitinate visibility from
Baker Avenue.
C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee
Fe—viewed URe proposal ne 30, 198" and, aside from the
usual discussions of undgrgrounding utilities, felt that the
only area left unresolved was the proposed drainage of the
site. « applicant is proposing to drain the tract to the
east and, as a result, requires an off -site private drainage
easement to an acceptable disposal area as determined by the
City Engineer. The developer presently has a drainage easement
through the mobile home park, but needs an additional drainage
easement from the mobile home park to Arrow Route or Cucamonga
Creek Channel. The developer has been working with the land
owner to obt0n the necessary ,asement but has not completed
the transa :V6. The &N0 ision Flap "Act wool( require the
City to condemtin the property necessary to install the required
drainage facility if the developer is unable to obtain the
easements. Failure of the City to condemn to obtain the
c!ksement- would null and void that condition; henne, would
result in a project that did not have proper drainage.
The Planning Commission, however, does not have the authority
to comusit the City to condemnation proceedings. The City
Council should approve the condemation `in concept" prior to
approving the proposed tract. Therefore, staff recowmknds that
the Planning Commission continue this item to the meeting of
October 14, 1987. By doing so, the issue of condemnation will
be presented to the City Council on October 7, 1,987 for
direction. If the Council is acceptable to the p- ;ibility of
condemnation, the item will be brought back td-the Planning
Commission for further review. If the Council does not wish to
pursue � ;ondemnatie ' e Planning commission could allow: the,
PLANNING COWISSIO' YAFF REPORT
DR 87- 14/713550 - ..r(EENvIEW ESTATES
September 23, 1487
Page 5
applicant to continue! this item for thirty (30) days until the
dra�Trage eas�eeent ben be obtained or the Planning Commission
count deny tfP project due to insufficient drainage facilities.
D. Tree Removal Permit: In conjunction with the proposed
deve-Fo-p-m-n-t.--tffe--a-p-plTcant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit
for the pr ')posed removal of 26 assorted specie3 of trees. An
arborist's report has been submitted to address the condition
of the trees. Based on the recownendations .;of the report,
there are five trees worthy of preservation. Three of the five
trees, iowever, are located in areas proposed for structures or
drive aisles. The other two trees, a California buckeye and a
Brazilian pepper, could be preserved depending on the alignment
of the sidewalk along Baker Avenue. If the sidewalk was
located adjacent to the curb, sufficient area would be provided
to allow the trees to remain in their present location. If the
sidewalk is to be located adjacent to the right -of -way line,
thereby providing a parkway area, the trees would have to be
removed. In reviewing the current sidewalk alignments in the
area, staff notes that there are no existing s',- -talks located
on the project side of Baker Avenue south of the site. On the
west side of Baker Avenue, there is a meandering sidewalk
across from the southern portion of the site and a straight
sidewalk adjacent to the curb at the intersection of Baker
Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Staff requests that the
Planning Commission provide direction as to the future
disposition of the trees. In regards to the remaining trees on
the lot, staff recommends that they be removed and replaced
with mature trees as required by the Tree Preservation
Ordinance.
E. Environmental Assessment: The applicant has completed Part I"
a Staff has completed Part II of the
Environmental Checklist and has determined that the site fails
within the Red Hill Fault Special Studies area. As a vosult,
the applicant has provided a geot%chnic report to determine if
the Red Hill Fault is located within: to project site. After
evaluating the trench that traverses the site, no evidence of
faulting was found within the project site. Therefore, an
active fault line is not known to be present within this site
which would ne- essitate additional building setbacks.
Therefore, staff recommends that a Negative Declaration be
issued for tM s project.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS; The project is consistent with the General
pan an eve opmen"t Code. The project will not be detrimental to
y public health or safety, or cause nuisances or significant
adverse environmental impacts. Adequate drainage, however, has not
Tq
KARRUG C-09USS - TAFF REPORT
DR 87-14/TnMGf - oKEENVIEW ESTATES
September 21, 4iw,
Page 6
'--'�,been provided for the sitt. ts a result, the proposal is not in
'dompl'ance w1th provisions of the provisions of the Development
Code and City standards and policies'.
IV. COARESPONDIENCE.- This ite* has Wen advertised as a public hearing
1n thew
_P rt new- per and notices have been �!��nt to all
property owners wilol-n 36�f
eet of the site.
V. RECOMENDATIM4 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
4.N:, al I pub
conduct a pqWT1,c; ;)e,,, rece1V ou ic input and test�iwy
Iter recetvii
October 14, 1,987 The koplicant has submitted a letter
on the propp�sqd, iq all,, input., sWf
t
recemmends that th 'IR Cow, on continue this item to the
agreeing to the contft n e.
Resw5t us- isu t
f i ted,
Brad B er
C City P
ity anner
BB:SM:te
Attachments: Letter from Applicant dated September 16i 1987
Exhibit "P - LooRtion
Exhibit 'B' - Siteflan
Exhibit NCu - Building Elevations
0
5,
I LAM A,vlO ASSOCIATES AAcM:TeCTl1RIE oNC PLAi1N!NG
t. :3=7 cAT.R"r A cAwn. *AN GIEGC. CALIFORNIA saiaa • TELi fM91 56!�;-9223
QATit September 16. 1987 --rI CEIVED.
err * Flo CUCAMOrM
Planning Department Sip 1 u TSB?'
AN City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 "C" Baseline Road �`��t t tilt t 12(3t41EP
Rancho Cu6amonga, CA 91701
�
Attu: Mr, Scott Murphy
.; Project: Greenview Estate iownhame
Foothill Blvd Oaker Ave
Ref: Continue Planning Commission Public Hearing
through October 144th, I987
Dear Mr. Murphy:
Due to the complication of the blanket easement at the ad-
jacent property, I agree with you 20 continue the Planning
Commission public hearing, 1-eom,�eptember 23, 1987 through
October 14, 1987.
t
Thank you for your recommendation and cooperation.
ince yours,
anchi'nglLam AIA
Architect
MLllsc
c. c. Dr. K. Chen
Dr. j. Huang
I!
NCa' OPT
_ OS d M r U
a" L
Fc
ZZ
ti
if
PAM
M / �M ,FCC M�
■ z r' ;r�= �- -- aaaa aata -Sits y=ar usimsaea` mass
LM
GC
ig
a _
-- Lm��
t CITY OF
RANCHO CU r�c�c:
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCkNjo
,NGA
PLANNING DR'SM
D-W
44,
ITEM: ;r
SUALL
cl,
El
CcSOLUTION No..
A RESMUTION OF THE PLANNING CrMTSSION OFF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAt MM RECOWENDING APPROVAL OF TENTMVE TRACT
MAp wn. 13650 FAR THE DEYELORIENT OF 140 TONNHOME UNIT:
ON 10.15 ACRES OF LAUD LOCATM AT THE -SOUTHEAST HEAST t'tWM OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ANP RAKER AVENUE IN r,-- .dim
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT -<APH: 207 - 201 -30, 41, 42 AND A3
A. Recitals.
(i) Greenview Estates Development has filed on application for the
approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13660 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolvnjon, the subject Tentative Tract Map
request is referred to as "the application ".
(ii) On the 14th of October, 19b'7, the Planning Commisr,' to of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(lit) All legal prerequisites tc the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, deter-mined and resolved by the
Planning Coarsission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows-
% This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth �n the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based uporT' substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the abb- e- refer -enced public hearing on Octeber 14, 1987, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker AvenLv with a street frontage
of 648,82 feet along Foothill Boulevard and lot depth of 837,55 feet and is
presently improved with a single family residence and accessory structures;
and
(b) The property to the south, east and west are designated
for residential uses. The property to the south and east is developed with a
mobile home park and the property to the west is developed witty a'townhome
ccmpl ex.
(c) The property, with the rLcommended conditions of approval,
comply with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 1365D - GREENVIEW ESTATES DEVELOPMENT
October 14, 1 "?
Page 2
(d) The devesapment of .14o multi - family units is consistent
with the Medium Residential land use designation of the Gtnerai Plan.-
(e) In that the applicant has not yet obtained the necessary
drainage easement, the City Council is agreeable to the possibility, of
condemnation in ord61 to obtain the drainage easemennF.
3. Rased upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Csmmission hereby finds and
concludes as follows.-
(a) That tentative tract is consistent with the
General Plan, Development Code, and sp°rifie
plans; and
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative
tract is consistent with the Ganeral Plan,
Development Code, and specific plans; and
{c) The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed, anti
(d) The design of the subdivision is not''kely to
cause substantial environmental damage and
avoidable injury to huawns and wildlife or
;heir habitat; and
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to :ause
Serious public health problems; and
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not
nflict with any easement acquired by the
Public 'at large, now of record, for access
through or use of the property within the -
proposed subdivision.
4. This Comission hereby finds and certifies that the pro,':.ct has
taen reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
tuality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commissinn hereby issues a Regative
beclaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above, this Commissian hereby recommends that the City Council
approve the application subject to each and every condition et forth below
and in the attached Standard Conditions atteched hereto and incorporated
here;n by this reference,
t hLANNING COt USS10J] RESOLUTION NO.
TT 13550 - GREENVIEW ESTATES DEVELOPMENT
October 14 1987
Page 3
Plat ng Oivisipn;
1 (a) The following items shall be incorporated into the final
landscape =tan which shall be reviewed and approved by the
City Planner prior to the issuance of building pernitsr
1. The sidewalk along Foothill Boulevard shall
meander.
2. Special accent landscaping shall be provided at
the project entries and at the corner of
Foothill Boulevard grid Raker Ax'enue.
3. Landscaping consixtent with the Foothill
Specific Plan shall be provi along Foothill
Boulevard.
4. Landscaping shall be provided throughout the
site to treat! a uni'cyirg theme.
(b) Variation shall be provided in the garage door design
stkbject to review and approval by the City Planner prior
to the issuance of building permits.
�or (c) Additional ar0itectural detailing shall be ,provided
around all windows. The revised plans shall be'reviewed
and approved by the City r'anner prior to the issuance of
building permits.
(d) Additional relief shall be provided on all elevations
fronting Foothill Boulevard. fie reliaf shall be in the
form of architectural detailing or landscape materials
subject to review and. approval by the City Manner.
(e) Parking space numbers 74 and 81 shall be eliminated and
replaced with landscaping.
(f) Parking. space numbers 82 and 83 shall be eliminated and
Building II -4 shill be shifted' south to provide a minimum
ten fog: landscaped area betweein the building and the
parking stalls to the north!, The revised plans shall be
reviewed and approved by •tne City Planner prior to the
issuance of building permits.
(g) The trash enclosure at the southwest corner of the site
shall be relocated out of public , -iew from Baku Avenue
e::bilect to review and approval by the City Planner;
PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUYON HO.
TT 13650 - GREENVXEV ESTATES DEVELOPMENT
October 14, 1937'
pTge 4
(h,) A final acoustical anal sit shall be submitted to ensure
that noise generated from Foothill Boulevard is _mit%ated
to within the levels permitted for both interior and
exterior noise levels. The report shall be reviewed and
approved by Ue City Planner prior to the issuance of
building permits.
(i) 'The 26 trees to oe removed shall be replaced with the
largest nursery grown trees available as determined by the
City Planner. Replacement trees shall be incorporated
into the final landscape plan'wnich small be reviewed and
approved by the City Planaer__,vrior to the issuance �t
buildIng permits.;__
Engineering Division:
(a) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and
c - actrical ) on the project side of Baker Avenue shall be
undergrounded from the fi4rst pole off-site south of the
project's south boundary to the terminus pole on the north
side of Foothill Boulevard, prior to public 'cipr,vement
acceptance or., occupancy, whichever occurs First.
Reimbursement :if one -half the City adopted cost for
undergrounding :o future development as it occurs on the
opposite side of the street is not feasible because the
property is presently developed.
(b) A private stormm drain system shall fie constructed from
IMS proposed project to an approved disposal site within
a private drainage easement to the Kati:`Iction of the
My Engineer.
(c) The developer shall make a gr -d faith effort to acquire
the required off -site propel -V interests necessary, to-
construct the requi.1d storm drain facilities, and i. he
or she should fail to do so, the developer shall at least
120 days prior to 'submittal of the final map for approval,
enter into an agreement to complete the improvements
pursuant to Government rcWe Section 66462 at such time as
the City acquires the property interests required for the
improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by
developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the
offi -site property interests required in connection with
the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs
shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given
in an appraisal , a.. ""t obtained by developer, at
developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved
by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the
adoption of this Resolution.
i� -1�
n
IM
PLANft1i1G rC RESF1t !lTIOlt NO,
TT IJOD. - fR ZttkcS D- 49.0PRENT
October 14,, 1 1
r - Page 5 �l
k`.
APPRGVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1987.
PLANNING COMISSIDN /OP THE CITY OF RldMCHO CUCAMONGA
a
�. BY:
arry if. 1 C e a rman °-
ATiC T:
ra u er; ?pommy 're ry
1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do he.»uby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted 'by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 14th day of October, 1987, by the following vote -to -alit-
AYES: COPV§SIONERS:
NOES: COW SSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS.
M
YQ 'OY 4yM
�CA rVjN 7Y.
o'ri�w�Ctl Stq ^Cn G�{��te°
W 6Y Vpa ��p ~6N
65
Si
��$NN433yyH S+g�.
N
w
0
�p
2
O
;V 't
F
ss
yC�yO>p :A OIJ�S C. � YO1 ywY4
yy Qa
eN JLC S O b� 6 T 6 Y C O 4 L' 9� Y
42
,tCW aSSys 4>r «Y 1y uCuCYS� ALI
Az
gCITW♦L11�LN
Y6Ly Uti C
t!$S pp_M .466 _Y E-
twi S L F
N s
y i gY
SOG Y p L.4CM00
M • Y • Q �� C' A. Z z
k N'qp yY ? {•��w.M7�y °e"I.CR.
_ �R • N �N. Yw.��g66P C�.9�
G O» n�L�ywM�w
�_
e Y Y SJ M Q Y> O
2 � C � ■N�. VwF�v
V O Y `. CU Mb.
°
AE NNN ;M rs° MMw`- +^�. -�
Va •V
P V N
o
gy
_ W�y �_
Y ! S y M 4
Cgis
a `a C
pia
g. 3.
)r-ao
11
f
V
11
^ ++YY,^ t >POrl�l Oyb`a L.'feo as CO 7 Y ^ �Y~4
{gypp Qir6bbb Y pp�+ O � rr-
O
''a
a" qg p.N-. X g$y43 {'$ °S o t! «v
8 Ai�tlj � y■� Y ±�(L @�j y M
Y�a-- 4 Y��wC �e ■9 N VO' iei� ~p ��w4Tg® qw
L'C��.�V.�
CiC �8yy .tw�P�: N Y 3p�— afb�ii �'L ^g�Y 012
� aw M
'
C O-.M ■ w�' 4� aYSb �r{� y+i �
Eta ^tl
�r�� L�beS' wg� ' �� N �4 =° �; ��� w bvw v
_ 1(., N
l¢1 N�� 'M+Y jy lC aNi� O.
f�f�/ ° b =
E w -:zFt p Y V A 6 V 7 yCwC
rig Yjl�f §� GC YC> Pyw.wM y UT
° ^o„� >Y `•`
r�we 2-5 �''$ 1�«Nyo-'
L GM 01 MM. o { j C ■p yj° bi�p p
&yti�u �w� `vx`^t Lga YpN Y�r�fl }. Qpy� }�BYN C�p�C >Sr yQ +C
C }iVu; in u: w� r _sNs OS Mi�M1 u M yrp� e� w , h' `�e i 6 ` O ^ L �_yj Y
4 ■SJR Y.�l N$pJ L�� rii +.�" NCO 12 I. L AMR, GC
w obi w�i
Li
b d'
a�a$;.�. MN
y�qi ae j4 �
di
�g � �t�
La of �si�oii C
g4 gO (1 y' A �aG
C45 Lam.., t4 bH^a
G V vY T4 *�C b O
p 3 c 65-3=
° m yet «9^ gy'�o3tyiy.
Apr y a 9 Qt s 6 w a ' a"
Y+`�M9 c
�
yL N Y f} Y N b y C
pp9 C6 p�`j �byV°wa 6qC
d Pi i Oi + O
i «$ «i`
Y
CO �`qC C'
Y " 4 y N� `
°a=$s o
tib� + +°L VGd�Ct
CC
P
a^�Qj®pyajM� �Q.��Yy�
SB�yCgyf yYw. VyLG6i�
I
N
t
s8
��
q
b
o ° Y
t ^
S
b
cw
a S$
Y�«+
�^
qr
bra
ova
M r
iow
u
ro3
Or
g�
4ira
J� c
L
NLY O
Y C
YP w.
G
AT
O
y
Y
b d'
a�a$;.�. MN
y�qi ae j4 �
di
�g � �t�
La of �si�oii C
g4 gO (1 y' A �aG
C45 Lam.., t4 bH^a
G V vY T4 *�C b O
p 3 c 65-3=
° m yet «9^ gy'�o3tyiy.
Apr y a 9 Qt s 6 w a ' a"
Y+`�M9 c
�
yL N Y f} Y N b y C
pp9 C6 p�`j �byV°wa 6qC
d Pi i Oi + O
i «$ «i`
Y
CO �`qC C'
Y " 4 y N� `
°a=$s o
tib� + +°L VGd�Ct
CC
P
a^�Qj®pyajM� �Q.��Yy�
SB�yCgyf yYw. VyLG6i�
I
N
t
-
i
`_p ttNk N ��Y pqT �01 ��O' \q +L GC p�pe q�� � •GqO pLO
Q r� ^N �.p q ON YQ yY�Ow.�N O�NY' � ■�O�O� t qQ ��..
V
ON ^y
�c
=�3t a.u: •T`Ts55/ /yp4'K ;� y =•- S_Su�pppw�NC d� �N" �N iMY
C6 NgGqN. ^ es(� ra2N '.�. YyyyO�la. NGO N Vy q YY CR L N Y'�+
�Vty NM •aM O.p Y�. C yCtyYiP?~�ptli� VCiOVMy =w 4`N�wy
gig i� YL•� p ^Py EO± MIy O� ± ^O�vNy L +LY quyV qY YM �4�LSt cN� ,!
4 + "• �� YiM + M=4Squy�N YLI�C Nj1_t MY{QpL
Gas LLt/ L +r aLN YIrt �Y O YNHYiI.�a yGG �1ttq T,4 aY �
�.YM TI y 6 K Y M q _ G•r 4il� MO L
�q yt QY. Y LS p
w 4dO0. ICt �P .^mow Y.qN MN� �w=iq L�j � +� +� Nti• +yam.
�y�trtY �O O�� �IL'N: CoC 1pggLNsy N=
Pill{. 6 y} b r' .!. + sCq YY1 w Y w Y Bl •w+ r L' l ^
nY.���Yat 1,� �N ,G�� =6 NyL+ G��pN yyyyK Yi O���tGS� �q OI _O aL0
L N V w L r N
L
Cy Cy
N r.NgN !M QN iN0 HN� LM Y��OI i.01�M S� �q�•L +C� �{jN iW
� to OI Ci
ocy as tic a u �nur cg i �`.aa�t.Y+
�$ �s to yN
�N+ 'COCA NR � yC gpY �Yt6
pp N v q N r 6 SY 6 fq. oL G L L
3G.. qd Yal• plop• ' j.9j-Q
�t Va y+ �O � (M. ~�C
q N L O •y,,. � � � ■ �4f cq ^ �. �t Y � +_ ' R N w p'. Q �NYa g1y6{' Y_
L •yr0 'y eO� T+ L' p +` Y�L� G GSt Y'p y~YVL
Yp& nom• �'y.{ C d yq•a
O O Y Ti 2 L pY y N II a ^GO N py w V
it! Y
6C O tcyy E �t.N ypV C ii•I•I CGL� w C> > N'P
w Y w
lip
pw i y V 4'S Y Y w y C6 LLa p� 44� V~ 6C
w .� GV�1 G 4 r y ;� �� p ' Ly N�NW i
+5 Al 4 aiOi ^ Y Y 2 p cc
i ay . w p
.-1 p
sO My � A
me.
q �
�nq fiVVq
s py� w ,G G O p ■Y
bL 411 •.IYM ���0�•�V
Wp Y YN �aY.Y N DY O�LB� ri �7Y .M AgMN.YwL
LC y �ACcd N ^1yDC �p�yyL Y rL�N V�Cw MS IvVeViyptwi �C }YYO
Yqa w1L yY> ^y ��J yy � NN C�yY $ -:j o= V }}■GJ�
Y1 Y� �p {O�'•ilf4 L = 4C. N. +AV.V yw �N� rOs M =V
x � ••
pt/ +■3 t C w^ V �4CC4v ��Y �N � Oiu.YLN wGM� w s Ny NO'pYL
,G t . r■ 9 K q � yt/ 4 C �
Cy NP tq�� y iQN IV fiN !V !d OnCw �[O.^ G 'C WOp . 65 A MYO�.
N
i0 ' ..n N M ♦ Ifl tp u
N
2
C7
11
Q ,r>
ice$$ r:I c:E,i &R °SV,YX,
Elf S
fa
L la y 4 yy py YY p �.V 7 004 Vi. 12 :O
°g'`'oo' ���
C ■p�Cp p YN
W WO -Z8 0194, uwy
y
it -�, ■ Y
0.
pK tY�eI Y0 ttY Y
w.- g
e 1° Yom;, in �«$g AI yy^ oY�d Yw $
eCyywiy, Oy.' M: ^ jay ¢&
60Y d.Ll'ipyy:ii �4 Y 1M1�lyM ��r?! MLq.Y q Y �a w01
y� 1. � TL
Le
a't'�i7l�§3t�r �$eSQ
Y5L wwC gizV
� ^T
Y1 ^yY F �O
y
Has' a $ a o �{" +�'�s q'�'A c$. nos dui Su A.21
!— ti �L�Yi • w Yz q ��� 6r . ���N
w _CC CY �Y tYJU O.w L {{gy�pp aY y�
t 0.K �^L O L C y'4O YCa
y ■L YqY q y ;f -= Y ^M �Q V ~O . a �6A ^N V i L 1« YYO
y 6 DY9 L ` OCC:T N�'hry NVyy qp L4V iiia
YL ^ L sqY TLXY qO. S. L Q
R9 �y�[ M N ' 1 y ~b�• NY 1rp; 1i g 9M Q �
$I ^'y. C y� Y I XXQCSi ^ Y]$p�CM `Y 0 uG d. q4' .'L
GGG�y..
y O. .10 � r {M�
^k Az y ''� LY O C XS DV NYG 0 �1 =L
p{ o uu
Lx ;S: p Lp ~y {� Y y yY M 4 YY i a — N 0
Y 1 q X u s
A '"N 8 o q 'ALL a
Y 01 Y YM � 0-5 Y O1�wC' 0r D_�O O�sY S t,f T
4 ++Y Yy p Y^ q�'L
M �iW ' G 4L�Xt NA�YC L. MD + C iT O� ■■ 4
g6"nM C� M 11O $oQ y.�
l�NQ Y NJ� JLXw. K .-.- K6.YXw y�Y =�1
J 7'\ —a
V /Y f QQ t YL Y a G i
ki
}ii¢
FFii °1 O t
ul
w°.Q XL.. i
O V ° 44 �. i ,CO ► TV Mr Ypp MQ Y! V v
�$'�'.. ��•••$ 3 N "r w Ya I;'- YES. L
Wasi �•..P.e L LYL•My4p� Y
iY 6:�~II V y -1 HM E !( I '`S m
Y t pCqp 00++ iL° 'L. a lzl1 vL O.. pF6
�O@ O
y� Y
Ca
Y•.
'
va
«Q
C
N w CM
=�`p
yf.l GM
•C
Lp
Ip
�L�a
pY Y.p
N.]�:G�
�44Y11` +�{
LN4C
O Y zip:
gam. ypY
N y�
Yr•�
aCC
O
=C�
v
�.�
qC�
i
Y
`�
r
iN��
MayY �
�y�
LpiYGC
�
Yd4
�,.
�
S. y.�.�
V�
�N��
�¢.GY
pB
VSO. g
��
�•i�
p�N�
O`
L
�
G��.
1vAyr
3j
gi
i
jj
r
�'u
I
° e
y
F-1
A
yyN
ar
�!
q�C
6` +�
sM�
r f
» V
as
p
all
r p
Z
6 O
.0.3 i�q.
y
+ y
01
.n �D
M�`�
a O C
C y N O V
+
is!
Q$
�Y3�i, aa�/n
"yyyCiK
CwS
M NY
W
!t`
NtyY�''Y4!
�ir.
`^�p�q{
�V Vlei
K4'O
QYi�Y
iYV7V7
d
iaJ G7
l'M
}ai maia
cS�iai
yM
YVN�
i
h
a.
V;
Sit
P& SZE
Sc I
r0 y ,d a _
sy pY �e
V au
ism V,
is
rya pa °e '� L►L- �y�ag s \ 'C a T. i
gas =5 _ r YY
r Y Y[ Y n..1. OL a$. C�4'LLOWWIWyy RvJ rY $ _�Wt w�,g
CV ttl � 5-5
"iYNC .iLL L�1 'LM C,�/Oy ilOr Siyt Vp GOV
Y�F`a bL �aM �� �l�G�"q ■p y,r Y � T_ M yG �
Z. NSNY`.4 V.O
V "OH'�C." VC;'F 1d VW O ytr.+ap ��
aY�iYnt%. ai ua Lo. e� 1 EMU- Am S,
•`•jdg '7Z .;'�,r
61-05 L� LYY •rV ig "tt�L{6�'e ^`� OtlC itl
V
aY` 4 I
ti� w 1�tl � �NYW iGM
_RO
"$
rar
-YMOr
V
NUJ
_
ZEE
C
E
LL
Y
Y
� N
Y
W
M
ML
NYN
CJ
1
i
LYd
+M
m�ia�u
q
Y1M
N
� Y
� O
If
Piz
gP
S�14
if
$n�
L +�C
Y
"t
pa�
a.1,WC
L6Q�iVQa`O
}
b
°
M
Fig
g
a
tl4
N"
MVV
N"
O.
Y
C�y6yy
M C
OY
ACS
L yy
p"
l6
`
`
O
tl
My�
( ■C� {My� y6yy6
M
< 9-C
•1.. C}p
W� L
ppC1�09
�t
Y
tiRf
.CL
t0 OI
..
N
Al
.i
_RO
"$
rar
-YMOr
V
NUJ
_
ZEE
1
�0
pr
d
L >ONrY
Li
1
F 4N
LYd
+M
..Ou.-
If
Piz
gP
S�14
if
_RO
"$
rar
-YMOr
V
NUJ
_
ZEE
pr
O1$IIr�
L >ONrY
Li
�L
F 4N
LYd
+M
..Ou.-
If
Piz
gP
S�14
if
$n�
L +�C
Y
"t
pa�
a.1,WC
L6Q�iVQa`O
}
V�40.
h-LV
«1Gy
M
MyO,N/.1
yQ
V1 W1r
id1
1M
-C V O.
n�
.j
1 Cam'.
Yp
Vo
L S
C
tt
1 Q
V Y
Sty
��u
^o'fi
w M
6
M
p r3
+ e
C
f
O
i
Et
G+I�+
ds4 y'v
Crn.
V
AV
1h
w�pa
W
p
4 O
•
yy»�
N
w. w
_
wYYl ^yyc
as"f
412
!}�
il.
VI�
iii.
T a
yyy
y
aC.. iat
6 ~
.�
STZ
_
..
OpY
«�M
�A�tl
y G r
a^�V.
tir�ryM.
4 N L
YMO
KNp
p0�
4��G 4
5"V
ip{�s
- ti�pFwi
s
.N
�Ltl
xi
,T
tlY
Y
W
L
pwn ivwYy�
Y N
�yCqy
L
�
r
E
g sC C b
Y 0 e
MNAf
L�"
Ufs
A
'3
V
«yy Y.
•
Y
a ♦Y
A..V.
1y4,
iV. tltt'
Mfg!
}
td
p}& 7
�yy.
M �Mtlp
Sri
yy
KLlq
C7t
+bN +�
F:a
K.LO
F+wpi
1R .Q
K
N
�
{
1
(bra
- Y
�1
V
1 Cam'.
Yp
Mif.
Sty
��u
^o'fi
w M
k
p r3
+ e
C
f
V
AV
1h
w�pa
W
p
Ff
•
yy»�
N
sp�y
as"f
412
!}�
;
VI�
e
m
j
i '
' I
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA14ONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
P:PPROVING DEVELOPMENT - REVIEW NO. 87 -14 FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF 1440 MULTI - FAMILY UNITS ON 10.15 ACRES OF
LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL'
BOULEVARD AND BAKER AVENL!E IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT - APR: 207- 201 -30, 41, 42 AND 43
A. Recitals.
(i) Sreenvieu Estates Development has filed an application for the
approval of Development Review No. 87 -14 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review
request is referred to as "the application ".
(ii) On the 14th of October, 1987, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW,, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planniz; Coma,ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
I. This Conaission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
bet forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution a", true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above- referenced public hearing on October 14, 1987, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and B ker Avenue with a street frontage
of 648.82 feet along "oothill Boulevard and lo': depth of 837.55 feet and is
presently improved with a single family residence and accessory structures;
and
(b) The property to the south, east and west are designated
for residential uses. The property to ft south and east is developed with a
mobile home park and the property to the west is developed with a tcwhome
complex.
(c) The property, with the recommended conditions of approval,
comply with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucaimonga.
(d) The devFft-jpment of 140 multi- family units is consistent
with the Medium Residential 'land use designation of the General Plan.
f PLANNING CQFMISSION n3M UTTON No.
{ r'' DR 87 -14 - GFB:ENItTE�t ESTATES DEVELOPFSENT
'r October 14, 3387
Page 2
P
i
(e) �z that the applicant has not yet obtained the necessary
\� drainage easement, isle City Ca%)ncil is agreeable to the possibility of
condempation in order t* obtain.,the drainage easement.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above- referenW public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed project is consistent with
the nbjoctives of the General Plan; and
Treat the proposed use is in accord with the
objective of the Development Code and the
purposes of the district in which the site is
located; and
(c) That the proposed`-, se is in compliance with
each of the appl,Jcable provisions of the
Development Codes and
(d) That the proposed use,``' together with the
conditions applicable thereto, will not be qW
detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties
or improvements in the vicinity.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1570 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
5, Based upon the findings and conclusiokis set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approvrs the application subject to
each and evxry cwdition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions atta&iLed hr;�eto and incf-lrorated herein by this re €ere-ace.
Planning Division:
(a) The foilowinS items shall be iricarporated into the final
landscape plat. which ehall be reviewed and approved by the
City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits:
I. The sidewalk along Foothill Boulevard shall
meander.
2. Special accept landscaping shall be provided at -
the project entries and 'at the corner of
Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue.
WMI
it
PLANNIN9 CkMMI8S1 ESOLIMON NO,
DR 87 -14 - GREINV Ek ESTATES DEVELOPMENT `
October 14, 1987
Page 3 ..
3. ''Lan;ascapingj rconsistent with the Foothill
Specific Plan shall be pro+r#,,ed along-Foothill
Boulevard.
4. Landscaping shall be provided throughout the
site to create a unifying them'.
(b) Variation shall he provided in tb �,' "garage door desigr
subject to review and approval by the City Planner prior
to the issuance of building permits.
(c) Additional architectural detailing stall be proided around
all windows. The revised plans shall 're reviewed and
approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of
building permits.
(d) Additional relief shall be provided on all elevations
fronting Foothill Boulevard. The re'�fef si9il be in the
Form of architectural detailing or landscape mat±.rTitrs
subject to review and approval by the City Plarner. i ":
(e) Parkirg space numbers 74 and 81 shall be elimina* and
replaced with landscaping.
(f) Parking space numbers 82 and 83 shall be eliminated and
Building 11 -4 shall be shifted south to provide a minimum
ten foot landscaped area between the building and the
parking stalls to the north. The revised plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the
issuance of building permits.
(g) The trash enclosure at the southwest corner of the site
shall be relocated out of public view from Baker Avenue
subject to review and approval by the City Planner.
(h) A final acoustical analysis shall be submitted to ensure
that noise generated from - Foothill Boulevard is mitigated
to within the levels per.'itted for both inter ;or and
exterior noise levels. The' -eport shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of
building permits.
(i) The 26 trees to be removed shat1 be replaced with the
largest nursery grown trees available as determrired by the
City Planner. Replacement trees shall be incorporeted
Into the final landscape plan which shall be reviewed and
approved by the City MInner prior to the is%xance of
building permits. ++��
1
PIA44TWQ i*W''SST4 RVSDLUTFON NO.
�.
DR 87 -14 WWWTEV ESTATES 1fFi.OPMENT
October, 14, 1987
ti Page 4
Engineering Division: I'
fa? The existing` overhead utilities (telecommunications ar;8�
electrical) on the project side of Baker Avenue shall be
undergi�ounded from the first pole offsite south of the
"pro�lect "sscuth boufi dary to the`'ter.minus pole._0._- fie north
side of Foothill Owlevard, prior to public improvement or
occupancy, whi ever occurs first. Reimbursement of one -
-- half the City topted for
:- cost undergr,�end1m from future
" development as it occurs o e opposite side f the
street is not feasible becathe
property is presently
developed.
W A private storm rany shall be constructed from
i
this pre poset. p o > tr an pp ro vrd dir posal site within
`Inage
p a privmte a easement ,'a the satisfaction of the
City Engiv*Rr:ana Building Official.
(c) O'Ffsite drainage facilities shall be deV""ved and related
easements obtained _necess&y to convey ;flows from the
k development to an a�deptable disposal 1c ition as approved
by the City. Engineer and Building OffitfQ, prior to
Issuance oV4ny permits (foundation, grading,' building,
etc.) for the project. Co,.rstruction of the facilities
shall be completed prior to 0L- occupancy of any of the
buildings.
E 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall Certify to
the
adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED �V ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1987. -
PLANNING CC44MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. Wel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary
I
PLANNING CCMIS `IhRESOLf?T10N
OR P7 -14 - GN M E Al' S D L£iPl Nf
October 14, 1987 ' r=
.'` Page 5
I, Brad Buller, O *puty Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby. certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly ind
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by.the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucawnsa, E a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held,
on the 14th day of {}cto'a a: 1987„ y the foi l M ng vote-to-wit:.
AYES: COWISSIBNERS:
NOES: C" $SSIONERS
ABSEM CONkMISSInNERS, "
C!:F
yy
�4}L��N _M iYiO iLI�M �y CCYO7 sAT Cmi ^Cyyr tOp YOI �YY .
`�•��p'bV O 4g. V V�M qpG •�'Y jf ■pY uC� `� iY�-�
O i V. ^��ip► �. L'�Y1� n L � p.
•11 4L3Y K��N ,.�=�0 �QA Ca61), 2:. ^C= acCYOV
ow'O. E.°.
V e.y �•Q L�}j pY _u3 ws ..�tt NOUN+ �0 �• �, �1�ry CVM p�� ^W
b=
T
tl yM y�IC..N �wyYY �Iftky �yMO 4��!�ry.�O Vn� ■��
*6+ L MYy3^ 9'sO0 {�Y Y S r ♦.I QI-A
l { µ�
� a ��M�
-8 ra '! H� ^r.•NM 4C01�`N Cep >y �g y�s 'd eiit -at Fy}e�'u
w j C P,.. � L ✓✓ri1 ..Ci LY ` i .�. \Y, q— IS � ��TT 'J' L �'� p ^G
oxw.VY CCO pA�M i ^i a'fiw Nos Tr,
e �L �Qi °. Y� N'c EY _e ALp� aV Y.sYyC ayl. S tom_
Y Vv GNYwi �y CC ` O�Y19q Y� yy
Y kN vOCCC YL. OA 1 C
` Yyp
g$CV
0LOg ;L -c D —. IN wr liMM
nai Cc]
Y
�--i
W
D _
�Qp
2
0
0
F
J
`Y(1
1J
iC
QY
•
p
JiOA �C�9.!�O}
� y
•
°
q
w �
Q �•- Y ■Y ■c °w o � ��j
.y�J
.fgC yy4a
1w.,.
�Y
p`
1y G�
N
ylM�
p•v
J
tY�
p L
MY
L
h�`�O'IY
O
p V
ppY.��
y Y
G�pY
yy Lv
94
^�
uYS
yS
O o
�In
�i
O0. Y
fit. ., 9 i� +N+
LL•
yy
■
y �1
�Yy1
G
a0
¢
ttN
M FAY
{^YYY.""�
lr��YN�pa
K �r
`Y(1
1J
caupw
off,_% esyw`ia��acx +sIiwu'4>
nom.
Qro �N= qw yi> L• y L O�
Mu �� V��rw. 4�NwV O4'rS O� *'OUa�f�ra Lww � ari�gw 00
C
'04"aN•( {NwV tl' _yCC ywwG � u 9 tits w�
°v.Qib
+� �+ pQNCNti Yw i Y a c'�c �g
N °CCx 9w�O'.,.�p�CO�L ^CV'iq °.w•>yYN Mi' lGCSa4 A8
yMyi'yV��gM le�O.G: Gw
rory N
` 3
LL. `O OA GC' Y �1 Zy cwcw d:V M. nL
Aq; � q § a�6 �N 'CYO1L N� � Y�'Y Tp
`' �° � � � $ C • 'O �?1{'t� � i RE. ► � L6 � a YV L � y 'O p
w L N. a ♦ 4~ 3 `.L
;;:-:j. 4 � V '@ ► Q N. • d e N w
YgY
FIN- -«92 Z-. w � e > y,r M!'�Yr Sm ►W. C iC
pLV
yy+!�M1fQ ?y C y�w 01 . y�.• w ��:.CC w � ro M, ►G ay� Y � I�ai yMw V a1r°~
r ~ I >sY.CY�+' PyYyG HE alw -I ...Qa
p
Lw��M. 4.7M4 !G °ii ii uY yw�.SN Cs iYw 04T. Ev L z
V )Gy R� ar 4 4au? .. Yw6 it 'ON wC �y tM
C�dw yt�n�G gd�Gw yG �wwN_�i _y�
;a rail �jrUC <Has t�g60
t 7sJ0 RNVYr IIF,YN NL Yti Y i Y
A 9OY . Ow. �?a� c ►. w roK NU�LOye VY �"�.
Ywroaa Myw`+d R yQr a .53 f3 YL 0 y0 i..
a.
N,y N�pV qG
6iCw N�' yYp, N,d� P+ Mr`" LQ�'S Vi14g„I C*R
nt yN rods E1Z .'`� 3 . — itu ey cosr .Y�csTN
� � w ^ O Y�a� N w ° _ - 1: 0 p. C. -y uC w �J ► O w N N t4 yy
Mir ��ayYO>o £tomY F NrGNwMCOt �a4r w M£$8
►I it F, L¢�t NCL Y Ni> Y
Ya`4O L` �G+ �yr� �� �,C �yC�p•p3MG `yCUY � ^C T�N� `cOOyL.
• t9
y�Ypy � _O .•► .. y YQ� wM�. O " �� M'G '` �F..��d+ro G EO ► 'YO +�i wG. "Ip ^4
D» 4 u ^ i4iz � O p .V N :«0r {aye `
� ~
ur Q
t °'G G1�`O�y� S. Nii Qr.ai IV
X1e y� 4+�;a «x :..r, �'w' m.�4a'> Poln C W�. >4 Elm b
Ew.? y�i'r MMMG.y,'a
1141 Y 6 �Q ` gN� L > .4w �7� w0 wJ ► y 4 t �Lcl S~Y.i � • N1 � G VY LY Ly. ±C LV C�Nyyr MC a 9Yti -us.—
6 p bts.nwCn, �
ttrO ,.M CC.H . . yr V Q
b'3
■ Y� y �,
Ni Zy OI � •G6G L.Y� '� a N M. Y. �` �
ra. 'OM C VCi VYjY„ y GV y°y �P" �r 4q CN6CN H.
�MjMa u i1v 96,y� p; pOQ. Cgy ^�A V 6.91r j ��Ci! xti.O O Y °
i; L. y. _C MYC ��+ wYr >�"�,iO!►rNrrl ~Lw i�yp
EQ0'i M' Pw i �1pwJy� L Vyehh ►Y p4L�{uN 0.fY 3p` dd.y¢ro0{yyly rd UC��Op O
<�OCG wN Mt NCI wiCr Mi+ Vf VwN �iV ..�M9�Rry NF�O. h..a4l 6L
\ h M
N
t
� Y.
.1`Y 'A
a o'a Y C t_ qu� y� G
V' S•l yy 6IIIO yyL C iQy L �yi��/
�n4O VyN� Vy iCU ,Gt1l q^ Pp +,'a�W�.YCCO. _'CC y�v � SC9L
fL NC y 6 O9 Y� +Y��wC°tY pw CV. YwpM�Y ��yl,cu� C wOY'M
!i �.: q��N O~�. G ON `O w'°•YOC°�OONNpS �yOLyOEo � w ®A�
a�ww p I L y�'$M1 + °w03�9 $Y�$
C L( C C • NL {� Liz
_ w ■y q4 >y jOp YGNS� YN.� �..3 Y ^� � Nh
3W N D 01 YYp GY V K U N E� C 6 •� � O a4{ N� M N �9 CC ?• w w w C° �
`•✓ CN Y L V V =po4 p^�Y siC. ppw Qy�NY.j�
•rCUzi
$NC� Si o'l�pO.Lw nN 44tOt����YY« G ^oCC �yY�� `��3pp� vN Cw �n's
�iS2 YN a0 WO._CO. E °��O`l =pL•Ci MOi "^ C +. wo`�C -
B5 o NY >.w- Yp Lw + Y C y
�T'� ^CC Yp s. pCM� �L. Y°M8WOpY~Yia s0���•7YY BN 9L '�
O 01r O G 1 w Y N+• w y ` y W w 6« Y N
O yY M C �pppy s■ vLt�-
Yt4TA NM '" .•eC..gw•���Y1 Z'g � I{N
E. ■'" a �1�^ ~NN NL' *y7 �' /YL9 �.a yC
iYGG re.-
N C
Le
aMYC
YY p \ ^y' y .y a rC �•���I1 C a
z G O /
CIIN <�� t� SN.6 �W= RN V�e�Wi Wq �QO �C w+°• L 6y ya�pN,
V
0 k
ppyy SS y�ca cg ei rb° Lta�Y�,�
V ^N
w C Y1 Y
Q iiC1 ° ,C
y= ` 9Er N L.1Ra 6i �•p� OL W` V^R -..,
E ^B mop CQ1 �. 6 ^. M,CY
oa° Sas; _
_
_
$N s p yQ �C1
O O w TLS _
Gi w byp w ^Y M R NN �a w s^ 1 > Y Y O r
6Aq VO ^yYlli
�vr •••$ ', $ '^ oQ 3p s�nwCE c'Yw `^u
Of�
A
L CC wwg •" q. �cY' N L� EVy2 P� LL °w LwCYy�.o ■Y
CVG Cvi i Mn w 6C �V�V nT wyOYO a.EY4 ^TaQQ'
�wLa •� +y+�oui .. ..�u N�� �a'r�` +��g� � a`4$ *'wNNY�i
dp�s� w: yeo.. {�� a�"'4y� ��yY �"y °w .rwi� .N•S"L'_i �� .w- ^i..rF.,..y�"°sc° ..
tlpY
pyq�
O.EY� L� +y
��.a� r V Er ^ aC^ « ^�• W aN Ew O UY^ . Y..� w w a V M"• QL �
�r� Wise,
�o��� o� <wE. zz ari $W
2
0
M
VPie. _
Se�5^ NuG
c Y -'■ i q>N �
$4th
aC. Z
•
all N N J
r, LES
!
CC uy qy L
C'�Np. Cdr t CCL CY rr
g i O yrj L N y V' SE-
LO E gL V Gyy
YVY ^� � F
c8 �aC$ o�$cTj u
h 4q�L r`gp yyLWgpY _�QQ }= L,
s.ZK « 4V�C N�V V
V �p ■Cp■� GV j� _� L C6Cee eYe if m
6. M + y Ji 1� A
+L A0CC N11 -PS, 'p�y[Vr _ttMYL
9 �0 r
s
_5I
pC A i H p yp C Y
qg_ _
�Lnp C T C c�6,�4„ LM �ppp? T
�V�Q
4 V i YN♦ ■ ■■ Y Qy Y �� Lss N Y
$GL i 1 CLy Yyr� j
ZI -g
ZC ^. � 9 g C
en
y
N CC Y V oC C E4+ C
r LY i LEI} C b _
is* Y Y rl N � Y�•r. �y us i(
l
V O+
^ N ;� W+
M�
ail
E r
a
wg>
p
gg
Y
N A
v0�Vy+
VCC
~
L V
�pN
Vi
O «p YYY
W
M« yyam
UZI
CM
^V
C�+�L�ANC
.Q V M
�YwLLy +'
n••N
2.
a^4y
goes
r'z p.
�V °YL `■
� VMV
C�
34
9209,
+4
Oyyo
� V W
YY 11�
p
yN^
Hit
L �
A�
pA9
l L
s o -
C L Y
L
�100
�c'.
Y
�MlY
�Y
Cj
«
f.
9q4
V
{8Y tC
O +Vr
w'
t ''
i��iii
Y^
O.OW
N
si0� pP, ~
dsiN N`'
19 V6i! G+
�LL^+C
I ` >
«D0
�mr7iid+
L
�,^� � 888LLLqC
CCN s q OM
swr
Q V « G F ^
w�XY
D �
Lsi
ail
E r
a
wg>
p
gg
Y
N A
v0�Vy+
VCC
~
L V
�pN
Vi
^tea
2.
a^4y
goes
r'z p.
C�
+4
Oyyo
� V W
YY 11�
p
yN^
Hit
L �
A�
pA9
l L
s o -
C L Y
L
�100
N � !
Q
CL�` � qd SNM LLIYwpY
1la v ° �
ONMl ziv -.C-
q = +� OZ�R SYOY4
.q Y y� y s �Nu� YLLp Nw
e� (�^�� `a�0 { ■{■�ENNL
qwM � LY YO.M�
It- gy =Li
pp Yy�� NLL'. g0p
ari O:s aaa�
wg
aqp,��
0 p9Y 1y. Wray qy6. 7 µ � `yv
yO a L
A O g A 4. r8 y w N C'S C N
�•Y N �� S�
� a u
Cq Na
qy
qq
Y
vSg
a� w
L O. I{�
y'r
Yp
a6
_
S.
eh
■a i
y
LY y
�RVYSJ�
�R
�Y LC
YgSM O
NYC O
v.+
a N
pg
gig
•.�
11-IR
NL
O y.
3
m�agrr
9
Ny.�^
;.
�.
aAA
Y
CL
q
u
sO4
IG
GGGGG
^o
��4411 �
o u
�i'�
�o
.Q
P�
VV
p
�Ma9
p�Y.
�iMy�i OC
21�
A�y ~
aN�
LC
��i
wN
»M
'�
oI q01 CY
NM��C■
}�, 40
Yfi
��
��
C
A
N9
?CV
VT
B
Gr '!
L
O.GyY.
VI�^
q
C +'�C ♦( �.
0 0O O
iY °a
O
w.
1bMYM€
'N 6lZ
88
��AN
LCL�.
NY
it V A 1
Ltl `61.M
QORw. ry,�
^'�Y
L 3
�°vSkM
Y'�QU
�4
3y
.. w{ gypp.
.Op, o
yyqp
i01V
t{1 yNq�
wtt.
F c
AC
A A 6
a
�J.I
O��rq+gyP
Q
O T-2 c
O L
L
;Z31
40E Ut 9%
f
�
FS
t
CL�` � qd SNM LLIYwpY
1la v ° �
ONMl ziv -.C-
q = +� OZ�R SYOY4
.q Y y� y s �Nu� YLLp Nw
e� (�^�� `a�0 { ■{■�ENNL
qwM � LY YO.M�
It- gy =Li
pp Yy�� NLL'. g0p
ari O:s aaa�
wg
aqp,��
0 p9Y 1y. Wray qy6. 7 µ � `yv
yO a L
A O g A 4. r8 y w N C'S C N
�•Y N �� S�
� a u
Cq Na
qy
qq
Y
G
e
L O. I{�
y'r
Yp
a6
v
YaYiY
v.
O Y
` �`y
p'.�.
■a i
y
LY y
�RVYSJ�
�R
ilS•
+
Qa�
v.+
C
q
pg
gig
•.�
11-IR
NL
O y.
3
m�agrr
9
Ny.�^
;.
�.
aAA
Y
i
v A
IG
^o
rCvna
io
�i'�
P�
VV
p
�Ma9
p�Y.
�iMy�i OC
21�
A�y ~
YT.
LC
�0o
wN
»M
oI q01 CY
=O
}�, 40
Yfi
g ~q
4
C
n`
C
A
N9
?CV
VT
B
Gr '!
O.GyY.
VI�^
'N 6lZ
C�
��AN
LCL�.
NY
it V A 1
Ltl `61.M
QORw. ry,�
^'�Y
L 3
lYn`�1Y
.( YV
�4
t7�o2
+itti
>a��r�
yyqp
i01V
t{1 yNq�
wtt.
F c
CL�` � qd SNM LLIYwpY
1la v ° �
ONMl ziv -.C-
q = +� OZ�R SYOY4
.q Y y� y s �Nu� YLLp Nw
e� (�^�� `a�0 { ■{■�ENNL
qwM � LY YO.M�
It- gy =Li
pp Yy�� NLL'. g0p
ari O:s aaa�
wg
aqp,��
0 p9Y 1y. Wray qy6. 7 µ � `yv
yO a L
A O g A 4. r8 y w N C'S C N
�•Y N �� S�
� a u
Cq Na
qq
pp
■a i
y
LY y
�RVYSJ�
�R
ilS•
+
Qa�
v.+
11-IR
NL
O y.
CL�` � qd SNM LLIYwpY
1la v ° �
ONMl ziv -.C-
q = +� OZ�R SYOY4
.q Y y� y s �Nu� YLLp Nw
e� (�^�� `a�0 { ■{■�ENNL
qwM � LY YO.M�
It- gy =Li
pp Yy�� NLL'. g0p
ari O:s aaa�
wg
aqp,��
0 p9Y 1y. Wray qy6. 7 µ � `yv
yO a L
A O g A 4. r8 y w N C'S C N
�•Y N �� S�
� a u
F
r «•"'pY L1tN y..i.� O « OyNMO � � G � ��Y LO
N �OpX V�
ac
p�Y r b N
yEMc 3�■■ ,io LiY ~
18 y qM G L; f~i0 My� N V a� N L� YN
VzIr VY Op L CC N C p�
Sti M y L. O Y y« ee pO� O Npp V 'C y C
C C O j r w C C 41 N u Y C M L L
CyfN
its y11 9 JN 4Y t-IU_ •C-_ V q �. �ji. i NEp V h
y�ir a pf
{Q
$�I. - -ywc a
SYN C L(L i o~ yN �'+Y... =V Nd Y 6 Y i 4
9vy Npr
y� y �
lab,
Y p VY yy o y YY
g�.�'i
u±�.�$= Sas ipai� 'Y__., r$ .'t`y.� =_uy tc.
r YO.4.,y GYUgV «1`L a
S Y Y `G
LyYYL F� IO. V.Y NM MSLyyY�. aF Y i r6= tp+, tl sV •L C¢A T°
�Ow�er7w N�7 1-6z; iGi
vi
&_37
Y N
St°
;,
1f
p
1
N
L oy
y�
LYN
V
�`$
q
g
3x
CWP.r 6`
xi
.t
aLw
�VY�WY
a
q�1�
rT�
C
GpyGk
�Y
r
CYr
cC
D
�jv
yyL n^
-G
N O
Na
yy9r
$
V.r^
Y
7 w
} L
a
7 0
w�W
}y
CYO`
♦ Iff
.p
^op
FS
pCC
OC
C■yO
iv
■gcVy
C
y
VL
NN
N
NV
N=I
+�
M
]( Y
C
N 00
Q
&_37
St°
;,
oz
reeao.aC�M
1
N
L oy
y�
LYN
rGM
�C01.i Imo.
Appyy
(V
CWP.r 6`
xi
.t
aLw
�VY�WY
■Lyi
q�1�
rT�
.CAa
GpyGk
7N
�jv
yyL n^
-G
N O
Na
&_37
St°
;,
oz
reeao.aC�M
N
L oy
y�
LYN
rGM
�C01.i Imo.
Appyy
(V
CWP.r 6`
xi
.t
aLw
�VY�WY
■Lyi
q�1�
rT�
.CAa
GpyGk
7N
�jv
yyL n^
-G
N O
Na
0=3
V.r^
Y
L.-=
6MV
S L V C C O
NiSW 4r
KKW
w�W
♦ Iff
.p
�aY
&_37
O
p
�
{.
L'rS
N
(J
tlY
44
ei
is se.
o
psu
G �
w L
Ya
Y O
>
yu
°
d
pG4
y q4
N V�
Y
Orr.i
yCL' M
�
'N
&
tl
G6Y
G t
�3
0
3g
a
Cif tl
C�y
7q
sew
�Y
aIu
L
C C
Y�t4 w.�
Y
YAM
666 Y'
O y 0
tlY G
� C
MtlM
J
r L =2
O
G 9 1
1 4:1 22
{.
L'rS
N
(J
tlY
Sd i
f��
�C
yu
Iy,
pG4
y q4
N V�
Y
Orr.i
yCL' M
�
ttY
J O
O D
tl
G6Y
G t
22
a
Cif tl
C�y
aIu
Y
tlY G
� C
MtlM
J
r L =2
Y L
T~ Y
+O` G;�YY
ippiN C
A�
T
Q
c
=Cp
f9
T
`
f>.YppyCy°
6
uY
So
y`�gC1
O
N y
N L Q 9
Y +„ s^
Y O
YyY
LY yV
itf. c0
pL qx
O ay
HALE a
C
14
G
„
pr
x
av
�
�M1
®■
u
p Y
M
Y
y
V
i
<M
Y L� ^C
NNaTi 3r
vO�yyM
G=J
pLp
Ohl f
�I
l
1
C Tr
tlY
f��
yu
Iy,
pG4
y q4
YL
Orr.i
yCL' M
.
L.0
ttY
J O
O D
tl
G6Y
G t
Cif tl
C�y
aIu
tlY G
� C
MtlM
J
+O` G;�YY
ippiN C
A�
3i�V.O
ZA�LL
LY
FMa
f9
T
y1
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
STAFF REPORT
Uri
E
a
DATE: October 14, ;987
T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Pianr►er
BY: Scott Murphy, Associat�(rvanner
i
SUBJECT: ENVIR(INMENTAL ASSES (NT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13722 -
WV- .:iA�"� "CI - A residential : su v s on o
,o" s oonn -, -. acres of land in the Medium (4 -14 dwelling
ul�ts per acre) and Medium -High (14-24 dwelling units per
acre) Residential Districts within the Victoria Planned
Community, located at the northwest corner of Victoria
Park Lane and Milliken Avenue - AYR: 202- 211 -13 and 14.
RELATED FILE: Victoria Community Plan Amendment 87 -02
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested Approval of subdivision map, conceptual
a-n- scape plan, conceptual grading plan, conceptual prototype,
and issuance of a Negative Declaration.
B. Project Density: 4.86 dwelling units per ac ""
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
or - sat ili age Commercial
South - Singe Family Residential; Medium ;residential (4 -14
dwelling units pe acre)
ast - Vacant; Medium Residential (4 -14 d*gling units per
acre)
i West - Single Family Residential, Lour- Medium (4 -8 dwelling
units per acre) and Medium (4 -14 dwelling units per
acre) Residential
D. General Plan Desi nations• h
Project Site - medium-Migh Residential (14-24 e-welling units
per acres') and Elementary School
North - Neighborhood Commercial
South - n,.A -
East - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dw0l ing units per
acre)
West - Low - Medium (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and Medium-
High (14.24 dwelling units per acre) Residential
ITEM E
�\ PLANNI'M COWTSSTOR STAFF REPORT
TT 13722 - William Lyon Compa4
October 14, 1987
Page 2
E. Site Characteristics:r; site is currently vacant with an
average slope o firom , ;ortim�to south. The site is bounded
on the north by Kenyon Way, tln the south by Victoria Park Lane,
on the east by Milliken Avenue, and on the west by Fairmont
Way.
H. AAM S` IS:.
A. lack round- On September 9, 1987, the Planning Commission
con&—cffid a public hearing to receive input and testimony on a
proposed Community Plan Ramenda"tnt to change the land use
designation on this site from ►Medium and Nedi -Nigh
Residential to Low- Mediuia Residential, After receiving all
input and testimwny on the request, the-Planning Commission-
determined that the amnt`asent was not consistent with the
objectives of the Generaf' Plan or the Victoria Community
Plan. The Planning Commission felt that by lowering the
density, variation in unit types could not provided witimin the
Groves Village. Thi t would thereby exclude a portion of the
population from obtaining housing units to fit their lifev}ale
and income. The Planning Commission also fol t that '�0,e
location was :uittd for :multi- family development due to ye
location cf the commercial center to the north and the ea ,!
acces^-bility to elementary schools and park sites located t)!
t%e m:..st and southwest. As a result, the Planning Commissie^,,
recommended denial'of the Amendment to the City Council
On October 7,1987, the City Council conducted a public hearing
on Ue proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment. After
considering all the public testimony, the City Council
determined that the request was in keeping with the intent of
the General Plan and the Victoria Community Plan. They felt _
that the proposed Amendment would still provide for a variety
of housing types within the Graves Village and the Victoria
Community Plan as a whole. As a result, the City Coun ^il
directed staff to pr,pare an Ordinance approving the land use
,- hange.
B. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 120 'lots
rang ng in size from 5,DOO to 12,510 square feet in area. The
average lot size within the subdivision will be '-s,712 square
feet in area. The applicant,. has indicated that this
development is a.tract subdivision only. The applicant will
rough grade U . '.i'.�, install the infrastructure, and Men
possibly sell the tract to another developer. The design
review for the tract would be reviewed by the Planning
Commission at a later date.
9
0
PLAN J�r
:PORT
TT 405 C-impany
October 14, 7
Page 3
C. Design Review �Commfttee: The Design Reviev Cowittee (Tolstoy,
Z1FFrc-R-,.-M- ' nFeMwed the proposal on September 3. 1987
and re0panded approval subject to the following conditions:
fie; e;i lrevised plans submitted by the appiicant eli,�,)nating
thell----!�L%ed for retaining WV along Milliken Av6ae and
providing a greater width for lot 33 was acceptable. 1,
2. Variation,'-fir lot widths Is not necessary. The dwelling
units sh6_.4 be designed to provide variable widths and
varying stdoyard setbacks.
D. Environmental Assessment: IM completing the Environmentsl
Uneckilst, sratt nas identified that the site may be subject to
Sig nificant noise impacts from Wvllikun Avenue. As a result,
an acoustical analysis has been submitted to address potential
mitigation measures to reduce the noise levels to a less than
significant level. Based upon: the recommendations of this
report, &�1 high barrier should be constructEA along Milliken
Avenue to adequately mitigate the noise aad ti bring it within
acceptable levels. With the incorporation of the wall in the
conditions of approv.' i , staff feels that ,a Negative Declaration
can be issued. That the Planning Cod f�is. zZjurs with these
findings, issuance of a hegativp,76eclaratio'a would be
appropriate i.:' the project is approv�.,d.
1II. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Victoria
Planned ro-m-OnTry—and the General Plan. The project will not be
detrimental to adjacent pr3perties or cause significant
environment* I impacts. �-o addition, the proposed use, together
with the reconnded (:ORO�10ns Of approval, is in compliance with
the applicable i*ovisfons-bf the Victoria Planned Community. the
Development Code, ,,�nd City Standards.
IV. CORRESPOWENCE: This item has be�"'uvertised ifi-,he Daily Re"rt
newspaper as a public hearing and notices 'were sent-fo-STT -prope-rfy-
owners within 300 feet of the projec)` site.
V. RECORMWIATION: Staff recommerd., that tte Planning Commission
approval Tentative Tract 13722 through adog Jon of the attached
Resolution with conditions and issue a NegatiVe Declaratl-on-
s PLANNING COt± SS M StW REPORT
TT 13792 - WiVIA .Lyon Company.
Page J
Ras (ally s Witted,
Bra B ler
City Planner
BB.S%:vc
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map
Mxhibit "C ' - Conceptual ',._btotype
Exhibit *D" - Conceptual Landscaping Plan
Exhibit "E" - Conceptual 6aading Mo
R.-solution of Approval with Condi t"s
Sm!Y7
.4
1 _
k1' 4r}
PLANNING - DIVISM EXHIFAT• e SC:ALL
G
E _:
A „
t 2.259 SF OS PLC
G 9
R'� 1 S LO SAW B. 4`,x51 Si .12�G
. `o-[ SU ►�� ,F.0 Lf 91 7:$03 G. S. SF
�.' a L .f�'� 61
S.266 S3 6.300 � b.]OT 5 06 �`�c
' ,SOT y
LL 31 6.021 63 x .499 94 f` 5•g75 F. 2q,04n ". 120 Sr St
7.314 72 far, *]0 6G 6,412 95 34.510 L 6•71� Sf
2 139 i3 i JAO L5 6.641 97 10.712 TOT6L G1: LOTS S.�p. SF
3 7.962 4 i 6.226 66 6,576 91 �. 6Y5 AV£B 2A LaTS 12.5.
4 6. 35 6.iSS 61� 6,615 99 5.425 1101- ?ALCr
5 6,032 36 6.195 61 6.2'•x. 100
6 tltn 37 6,554 69 f.154 101 5'.51
6 6,765 3s, 6.61S 70. tG.� 102 5` 125
�k 4
7 7.3S4 2S 6. -A1 40 " 6,922 125 T2 6.40 3°'0 ltl }. 6.695 ..
9 S.0SO 41 -. 51 0 105 6.690 -_
€. 11
6.150 9l5 42 S E30 7b g 027 10 6. 2 . .
12 6,260 bq 5.006' 75 >., 9.Y0� 107 6.300
5.000' i6 JOB 13 S.604 45 5.304 77 6< 33 1G9 5.j
15 5`074 ;6 5.1` 71 6.,01 11 "• 6.]95
6. 47 5.450 79 9.10 lil 6.310
16, 6.t3i. 41 5.550 10 9.657 112 7..310 -
17 6 11 5.509 . 12 5
so . 49 5.600 -. .5 11"5 350
- .6.150 114 •4T2
19 6.953 51 j],1i2 M j,2S2 t15 7.655.
20 3,974 52 6,375 64 5.150 ,16 7.05
361
4J 1 6,350 52 6, .r - 15 5.150 117 7.110
5`SWf 5t.. 6.'S7� 56 5.210 1t1 7.319
27 _
5.200 R . 6.116 17 oSO ]i9 692
74 6.6SS 56 6.120 $a 6.05 120 9,
5.9 57 6.739 .4t7 4.325
g- 26 6.664 59 x.259 90
Its 7`611 60
29
i i� g • � 1 ar. ire � � �`N_. w ;. r � _ �'r°r•
�. ? jyj iB lr .• �• .zLiK is..- mss_._ % \_ :�t� � -.
1• ` ` F.j s.. --4-�� •a4 " k ,+
t «
rF1�' T1Tl --�
p'�ZNa .�
0
I
-,t, p
N
1-H
CITY CT MAD AV-
RANGIO CUCkNIONGA TITLE-
PLANNING DR'SM EXHINT.- SCALL--
Ji 'i -
- .. fi
I
KA
CITY OF
ItA, ITEM:
NCHO CUUMMON.-GA
DIXIISM TITLE,
PLAN NI NG
EXHIBIT --Af=e-_, SCi�LE:
f.
Hill
KA
CITY OF
ItA, ITEM:
NCHO CUUMMON.-GA
DIXIISM TITLE,
PLAN NI NG
EXHIBIT --Af=e-_, SCi�LE:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTYON OF THE PL ,NNING C014MISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROYI:iG TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 90. 137^2
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT 0;-' 120 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 24.67
ACRES OF LAND IN THE "MMIUM AND M,EDIW -HIGH RESICENTIAi
DISTRICTS WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED
AT THE NORTHWEST CPRNER OF VICTORIA PART; LANE AND
MILLIKEN !.VEHUE - APN: 202-211-13-AND 14
A. Recitals.
(i) The William Lyon Company`-`+as filed an application for the
approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13722 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter ir, this Resolution, the su6Ject Tentative Tract Map
.r ,uest is referred to as "the application ".
Cs {) On the 14th of October, 1987, the Pianninr, Commi Sion of the
Cis, of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date;
(ii -1) All legal prerequisites to the adopt.or of this Resolution
have occurred. I
B. Resolution.
is NOW, T:fEREPORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Pla ^ninq Commission pf the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
I. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true &nd correct,
1. 8aged !upon substantial eviderce presented to this Commission
during the abuv,�- referenced public hearing on Cc;:ober 14, 1987, including
written and Oral staff reports, together with public testiv!ony, this 1
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to the property that is bounded by
Kenyon Flay on the north, V;ctoria Park Lane on the south, Milliken Avenue on
the east, and Fair, ont Flay on the west. The property is presently vacant.
(b) The property to the south, east and west is designated for
residential uses and the property to the north is designated for commerc.al
uses. The property to the north, east, and west is vacant. The property to
the south is developed wits+ single family residences.
(c) On October 7,:1987, the City Cooncil of the City of pangkc
Cucamonga approved a Commatnity, Plan Amendment to change the land Ae
designation from Medium and Medium -High Resid<:,tial to Low- fiee'um
9 "" d reading of
thei0rdinance.The change will become fi 1 3v days at'ter the second
PLANNING CMS5IOK RESOLUTION No.
IT 13722 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY
October 14, 1987
Page
(d) The develbpt5ent, w3'th the recommended conditions of
approval, comslIP', w«th th!±_,minimum development; standards of tyre City of
Rancho Cucamonst4.
3. Rased upon the Substantial evidence prese-
K01 to this Commission
during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
fats set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follcwsr
(a) That tentative tract is consistent with the
General plan, Development Code, and specific
plans, and
(u) The design or ia►provevents of the tentative
tract is ;.onsisten't with the Generate plan,
Development Code; and spacifira plans; and
(r) The site is not- phyizaily suitable for the
type; of dsvelopment.proposed; and
(d) ..me- rtesigrr rx the subdivision is not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage and
avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or
their habitat; and
(e) The tentative tract is not liKelyy to cause
serious public health problems; and
The design of the tentative tract will not
conflict with any easement acquired by the
public at large, now Gf recorl, for access
through or use of the roperty within the
proposed subdivision.
4. Ttis Comm�tsion hereby finds and certifies t.at the project his
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
t)ual ti v Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Dd'iarat, fi+n,
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
I, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application ,subject to
each and every condition se: ::nth below and in tho attached Standard
Conditions attached hereto and herein by this reference.
A. D canning Giyis ,sn
I. This map is >being approved as a Tract Subdivision only j
Any future proposals for the dteve opaten o vz trr more
residential units shall require Design Review, aIaroval
prior to the issuance r{ building Permits for any un,ts.
PLANNIING COW'ISSiON''AESOLUTION NO.
1T 13722 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY
October 14, 138,7
Page 3
w
2. The William
Lyon Company shall s�oatit a disclosure ,
statement for this tract to be reviewed and:appro -ied by th
City Planner prior to distribution to pt#rspective
developers of this tract, The disclosure statement shall
state the City of Rancho Cucamonga's conditions,
requirements, and expectations for development standards
and product types for this tract including th2,provision
for variation in the unit widt=hs to create varying - -side
yard setbacks and building. separations.
a
3. Landscape treatments at the end of the side -on cul -de -sacs
shall be designed to provide an open view into the interior
Of the cul -de -sac.
4. The fencingi -iiis required for the tract shall be
t consistent with the feneingjwallr indicated on the
conceptual landscaping plan. Wood fencing expt,sed to
public view shall be heated with ,tain, paint or water
sealant. Fen.ing on corner side yfeds and fencing along
Kenyon Way, Rochester Avenue, and Victoria park Lana shall
be decorative -block (etceat trail fence along Victoria Park
Lane which shall be per City Standard),
5. Any retaining walls used are to be a maximum off,:= TwQt
high.
8. All retaining walls visible to the' geneial. public, 'i.e., on
the street side of corner side yards atvii within the;.f� -ont
yard, are to ;,e constructed of a decorative materil.l to the
satisfaction of b)e City Ihanner.
7. All back of lot graft differentials are to be ?, maximum of
12 feet.
B. Ed�lneeLing Division
1. Ail pertinent conditions of Pa.cel Map Zoi85 snail apply.
2. The trails to be maintained by the city shall by
constructed and'' dedicated full width incorp*rating a
separation device surf, as a wail or curb to define the
limits to be mainntained by "the City.
3, A drainage ivilet structure shall be constructed in Kenyon
'Jay to Iccept the orate.- "from the northern parcel to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
4. Construct tilat portion of the approved area Stove Drain
l%ster Plan as required by the City cnginece. f
E. City maintained ,lopes shall not exceed 3:1 e cept as
apprm*, d by the City Engineer. /
r�
PL COITION NO.
TT 1 , ` G ,LOWARY
October I,,
Page 4
6. The Deputy ' :vretary to this Commission shall certify to the
f
adoption of this Pesolution.
APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBERo 1987.
PLANNING C ISSTON OF THC CITY OF'Rik)40 CUCAMONGA
es :;
BY:
arry T. 161 a r ai`" r
;i
ATTEST:
Brag er, Deputy secretary
I, Brad Bullu. Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
R;.ncho Cucamaga, do hereby ;certify that tW fo regoing Resolution was duly and
regularly i ;ntroduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning, Commission of the
City of Rancho Cursamonga, at a rettular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 14th day of October, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit:
z
AYES: COWISSIONERS:
AML
NOES: COMKISSIONERS:
1
USENT: SOMMISSIONERS:
f J
1
ke�•
'
:_c ^.,
E
t
Z
F
3w3
a
Yy i 4u V VlL.I t��s
iC �+�w Nwe ^u iYYp L Y
Cc
rS
M
��I }.M {YjE+p Cti
E
pia 3 °-0-' EX
%CZ:51! aSP
Y a« ..66 `
�Y ANVOyN �OOp
���� N o n o
V V y
'd L�S^9Ysa.Y` it Sp
Er y O°� N.L Y� 0.
�I
} y
u
t.
�S
0
V
F
O
y,
YCLiGY
V r
."Y.iuyy� �E ���� YYC o`s4CCpa
°i �yiy 6R lC Y� w V ^fit wsL oT
$vO L'O , YO � N. �0aY4 Zatt
cw `N.'i I Ca 9 i Cn:4Y
�� :t w iL L Ua
Y N 6 t My CyY 6V ^.Y
Lp a Vqµ� gpl, A
sto TL
p y p3 N T
N CC • ■ .y� H
nj
J. NV Y i CMS
«E° i Sgt iSt>
Y YI ^tt
9 M_
_a Tj
92 ; st �1
a
Stya erg,
4
00
a.;
NZ �Y
ocrr
Y J
O
u^
4
C V
- u
A p�
�aE
a
t r.
H
JM
f. P
�\ faY+..� C�(J C>L.'ryOYyN Y <3.i VIIY 34� K G�N4 4. Y1
\
'Labs O iO�� Yi
y Criw�1•.N� B r� 4 O L M((� s. N '� Y ° a �)
' • � f r. A : _ ;, f Y �uf 4 0 0 `Y O j4ii r � � ,r11 # ~t Q 4
QC =NI.$ fo N O�LYpY y I�LM n
« q C p q
Iy O Vr��YV �
L i$ aid w
m f r• y tl� C^ L f�� a� a u M �l i S �� � !. � « p � � Y �L. R P
G Y L3 ON «�.a.r• SYS ¢N._ .G ti H5
• N, �p N'. i y : ®4 Q f 'jyj� �9� Gl 4 N 9 0 V
Y Lw C. Y N��. Nz
L. y y 11 pLr fO.,�iU. �M
YRYO.L �•�• jy� "�
nY
•��pW �V Yf'6 fiiN� °^ ��p��T #�I'� iCY
1tayf NNR ICY MY� �}p N'C M , YT
CMP yg_ij« .ice =M0 L�G - if 13.
M a%_
YG%artNYl$.SS.i. ' } ¢'fi'3 a �'� 31cp ', Z`e
N M N' N Y I N M Y. ! A F w� N 131 1 Was s 1 G 6 L f f 0I N R l
N ~ A G
r M 17 v! sa
fro S O4
OfL
gyC
�'YT
r4
f
Y; Ny��
O
2.�
• «Y.
Mf`
C.
�
�d N�y«
0
O
iNMi 1�
Of
H.
N•
f
_HM
ul
« f �
•
� �
L e y
>�
�.�
iO�
q -j _
LY
o
f$
yy
f4�t`y
9G•
RpN
OV
asi C�pi
9LLy
�33�? 0
osi
ON��
�H
«VVY
6ocN
�«
i�
cwt"''Giq
3g�■
!y-yYY
.�j[� MMUC
c0
C
V O
�S�
9r.4f
g
1.0
ZSC
YY
r4. rr+w
�.�.a6
�9
3bbppyy�vggY
1:
V >M piygL.
`�OiG
Q,r
M
w3�'y$Yd
' 4
ya,
>I
{puJ
rCN
�L MG
K - ^.Ni
VIII
tV
@0YN
.tvl
i/
�� ♦ANN" Q�
ffyyyYLO O °a�E
vLiyr YyMx�NY
Uys
rs, 12
Cif u
gw^aN'aeR g c��'R
o Oa N fVVr
� a !CC OPw COyO, iyQ +.3 Y+CY Mp
+cC+c C1w �O0 C.�n��O
YY ONMM �py �OV
6O/ ySAN• Vq� `C
Ail m .NQC CIO
P
i
g`5g 41''F.'`s g
79 1
�4$ y
`w r °a $ 4 1_3
a AS
Lto's ss.5'6�e:�r°.
v 59.". 2= ``S ''••4{4 aMrt$Y` .,�'��.�N+ 0 E „FeC
NNY�r y Yj•� p■ 4, pN 6. y•p MYip. VIE & N. JP
7Y `
4"p �pMM�rnMa YON NC60 �a� iiiy�iii �CYLON e� �''h�l�
s° c e ~ ter! o G 4 G
io $
Y1Vyp+CI`aj og "Yia� ..tO p y'5EY L$g 1i T €_± d. ■is f aOQ gh
LT . x n 1 2: .f=Yl ,O8 }pg YON 4 s
}�
w`L � ^Y RM3 p� qMw SS �c L L
•iVO.� �r, a Oiq NLO .Z�YM L.. NO� �C 7j76 w� jzw C
Y _ 6 f x o�L �Y r R'•
p��iY 04w ON �.r y4u ;��y iii i. G4y
{Y{� dyr Oy,� �N LI �N ��130• N�' 6pwC �M/yNM L.eC 6O6 �I a•YCYA y$�Swy Qc �G del �Op
YM V �l GY.y Cy CYE „Y g MOM 'N...
pCI3O� VAC C YY
O. L ++ Cp yy C "� 4 Y
^� �
ai� YNNY.� GC NT C +'P•M'. A OGM �� °M-.Ti
ItE
M_y`
CIY CM
15 zoz
p'�O u■ yy ,dG3 i ,ua NasN ♦q�.. ^-b N $Fq+
? <G •ENC N^ NY •� 0NJ-
G 01. i Ap >V {1�N1
Nom. ^ t Y' L .p Y"AP O�ill
L l Y i
r ^m lip
V Y
CpC �. Y •6 �wYN �i� aCn° ']M YV.� °T.
t •� O i Kc Y� Qew gn C ��i
� Y
33 yyN v °4" °ACC °” °y is E gip.
Y i Y� V y V u -" .•. Y� � G q C „NOM ^ 1►. '� w ` S C I ■
O9ry
AM 1 CO`fVy�
=L YC 0.y 42.f 4Y8 •
2
11 Y p Y Y yrf q Qvo � •°�N N��yt
Y N iKr Y O >�M Q uY
Lc. 6A O.... N u M V C Y ++S �pN JY,•�„v
° 4
^yg,� = r Y aC... W�Y 3N � O Y� . MM�1 � G Y•� °LO.
at -a si ►.$ a sv'. <°` �xi'L"sirsJ3w °°
°
I
I I
9
V
a
H
O
M ,.�Y,
L Cy + {ns4{ A i Y
Z= t Y F tl.. +� OL £ y`t Yy ■C^ �Z f�� ~} Cayce
aafr jL ^ {yO� yN fC21 +a "iii p
"L iCS g1 1 ,CL/yM� ynyj ._ YES~ QYf:. �M! a ar
leis -��o §SUS «'pii�a°4 �
_o .fix z z
it
c L w •a � � KU" � ° � TSs� +'ti
wwa-. riry
iY* II 4 3 I i {.
^+Y„yR�� �'�a�ajj�j��:. pC ".±.�.�•�p�Yrta �. ��"" �(�. ,�i"p�M w,�.�+i �!' �_yGu $�
OLY �LY °aa,M` i•ti V� �YrS wA +� y; yT
2
x
y L
p L y
ace t lw �� a
3.4
4a
.U[ Y �uY 4+ '� 2 ■p i � "f _ Cam N
Pr
\ \?N tM. �}rr {�� r " a'�w
agg is + -El
we C +lV ,ma y >Vp.• rya Oety 4Op 4� T mow.
Gtq `Y +� •Sp g � rp +�.G��S. ��{ ?YySp'aL�.M� yl�p�.L MN +RRI Fi` w ���p,tr
!Meat ^ MQ 'a!'!
r'S r' A ♦ ± q y O Rj « C i fry S
VYSY q �l ra+l '�Cfw'C WnV faN ��11 iy1 1a'i_, d9
`�' 7 +8 ■Y' � Ty s�ni
C 3a..
HIS
F
IJ
I
LI
U
a
11
2
�eNgQ Ell
�p � _ v T
` L
6S
a� yyyLL:S R9 i4]µ! ayyi wT .'S a!1M� a
W \ \JLL CEO Y�YCr�� yyT N. .��
v a I it, iI �> 1
n_
Y wi N
I9 f 1p
12
aK
a
cY
r
�r
ttA
i.�
Y
�.
3L� ♦C
G
Ne^wq
��
i
a3
�s
s'ia►'133A
Nom'
��
wa4
�•
.��
♦�µ
'O �
�a
,np �1
M.�_C �
�O
%+•y+�,.�
��0
LM
r �
ey
c�
�r`" R yyn
�
y�
YHL?
• a
p!J�
bJ■
�
'a �
�
w A
�
yyaS� �
7i
t: �
u CrQJ
�T
Y� •
W Vi:Si
LAM
.
A
TL
O
tA� G:1
K
'Ow
O d
pM�
4
W
C O
�I E
^y
C
a�
a3 _g-ti j 3 3, b2-. ;-
fill
xx
Ell 32N i2-'
i �� a-2112, y ze%I irij $
30,
V fry
,M?�xop
S
Jim ILly
Yf1 1p•� _
u�
L-0701-02, 0 10- 14--87 PC !Agenda 2
i'-
t�
R
^+� r>
1 r
� 3]t
r r N N q e
sw3 YYF p
.«I+"G' ara
�al1 M q .!�f,�r
� N A G G
gab pY
Yel
G t a+wY 62q '`L$� ` Y ` arYS 0.eb, V
fa- all 2
tll N.�R1Yrp �i.. `rL aTi A 'sS QVQ s'+pL` s�Z aroO ^_mss Yr 7c .p..
E�O1q
„F+V"Sr 9.M gryGj o MvvC yNOC NC yr �L � O YpSy VYL
GV ��� ��pK1� p4a «• V NM L( F �ilY1
2_6
h
Y a+L.GWM Y.i _VLLMV _ �M CY.V � �q�yN1 jSY it �tlO L cc yCw f7 {f LL.VR MY
<Wtl Gi
i E
L �
�q1Y V
L G
q W p
«
�,y O
Yr u
L
c� a�
C 'Y
Y L M N
C 0 N p;!
Y i
j� • C N
1 Y y
V « V M
M ` ~ r
gr g� g
�H
FI
■qfq �: yC
Nci:3 J7 0
M
I r.
L tigq cL V
Y N of
J
E'_C�o
4 0
NN xAY
axsr prY
AP�'
nit
G�-S.
Cy
e�+i ya
�•�
YC�
q�YN `.��u1q�
L
y Y
N p
se
h «
E
^y p
'Li
413VL.
w 'g gNr
u
T'N
Yp
�Y1`RJ
N pb
a r
r�41
�C1
Gy'
°NY�wN
�N
t2a
Y�� x
D
z � ,
LL°C
O
QYFN g6�
Cr O�
y V p
u H
°_�
Y
ter^
U Z;
��'CGx
MLrp1
2� W
V
C
1
I
}fj�N
w
w
E
�T ppL
L'iV.uo� •ice ^ S
N L Y■N P 1 Z O L
VSEp « °«
VM O V Ya pM.�
pp V.V V�pV 9O� V.
1� C~ C L •�� w.
C Y Y e C
p Y L C +u+'VO
y q G O V Y O
tiOI NLr - Y'�+Y Y�Y t,YG
i 4 q A L C 0 4.` QI
O'9�y a °•N
KS
Y N L • L _
M
i J
L "hM
_e
L 9
O Y
+
y
y i
6
Y
v�j V
MMe
O�
p
N O 9
=may
A
x C
O
L
yyV
�
na
rV "e
Q
O
t3
LVt
� L
N 1
Rti
O L
^ « L
>t�a
N
CCA
i n0
cpY��ry
iG M{i
b
I
ti
.I
�T ppL
L'iV.uo� •ice ^ S
N L Y■N P 1 Z O L
VSEp « °«
VM O V Ya pM.�
pp V.V V�pV 9O� V.
1� C~ C L •�� w.
C Y Y e C
p Y L C +u+'VO
y q G O V Y O
tiOI NLr - Y'�+Y Y�Y t,YG
i 4 q A L C 0 4.` QI
O'9�y a °•N
KS
Y N L • L _
M
i J
L "hM
C
M
4
C C
N
as
C
yyV
�
9
a
O
5
-2
G G
N 1
Rti
*1u3
L�M
�
N
Y
o
$.aN
.Grp
Vw
O p yy
Y L
M�
`
Y
O
`¢!
I&
L L
Y
GL
g�
C u
pAC
Y
pd +OMra
z.2
NON
M�
OU�
^Ax
+yyGyy G
O
GLC
Y
yV
q
Yp M G
ttV M�
fitG3
i�Y.
I�N�
�
uu�pYL pO.
�.q �G.Y
YT
Y
LG
O�.i
G.N�N
F- #
.C4C
N
A
N
a
L V
b��
M O N
Gi4.
C C
as
ri a
yyV
�
9
a
O
5
-2
G G
N 1
Rti
V V
V q
o
$.aN
.Grp
Vw
O p yy
M O
O:y.
O
`¢!
Y
J ■pp
g�
C u
pAC
Y
pd +OMra
z.2
NON
M�
OU�
^Ax
+yyGyy G
V ^
GLC
Y
yV
q
Yp M G
ttV M�
fitG3
i�Y.
I�N�
C�stri <t f.S'L'< n a Atl--Cl rtTfl A EirnI.T.- A
STAFF REPORT
10
DATE:' 14, 1987
TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
SUBJECT, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -42 -
WIWI- - A proposal to constrUct 168 spar n un s WR
."acres of land in the Mediurw-high Residential District
(14-24 dwelling units per acre) located north of Base Line
Road, 550 feet east of Daf Creek Channel - APH 227-091 -
21. Associated with the proposal is Tree Removal Permit
87 -67.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION.
A. Action Requested. Approval of site plan, building elevations,
Tree Removal Permit, and i—tance of a Negative Declaration.
B. Project Density: 18.6 dwelling units per acre.
C. Surroundin Land Ue,,* and Zonin .
North - ou ern a- ITIc ,a road and Vacant; Low - Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
South - Vacant; Victoria Planned Community, high Residential
(24-30 dwelling units per acre)
East - Vacant; Medium -High Residential (14.24 dwelling units
per acre)
West - Fire Station, Medium -High Residential (14.24 dwelling
units per acre)
D. General Plan Designations.
Project Site - Medium-High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units
per acre)
North - Railroad and Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling
units per acre)
South - High Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per acre)
East - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per
acre)
West - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwl l i ng units per
acre)
xTEN F
PLANNING COM3ISSI N STAFF RMRT
DEYUPMNT REVIEW 85 -42 - KOMFF
October 14, 1987
Page 2
E. Site Characteristix.s, Tire site is bordered by the southern
ROM Kali roa .�ge north, Base Line Road to the south, the
fire station to the west, and a vacant parcel to the east. The
site dopes gently from north to soul at a 3 percent grade. A
large Aak tree is situated in the rear portion of the site and
is to be preserved. 'the remaindwr of the site consists of wild
grasses, cactus and sagebrush. There is a small wc�ud structure
in a dilapidated condition that will be removed,
F. Parking Calc loons:
Number of Number of
Type Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Ratio Rewired provided_-
2 bedroov units:
Covered Spaces 1 ¢en unit 168 176
Open ;paces 0.6 per unit 101 136
Visitors '',irking: 1 for every
4 units 42 42
Total 11 354
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 163 two-
bedroom, one -bath units. The nAits wil'i be 790 and 840 square
feet in area. The buildings are designed as eight - plexes and
sixteen- plexes surrounding central open space areas both in the
southern and northern portions of the sit Carports and open
parking spaces will be provided around the verimeter of the
site. Initially, the si. ,,3 will be served by a temporary
entrance off. of Base Line Road until such time as the parcel to
the west develops, At that time, a shared access will be
provided.
B. Design Review C,z M_ ittee. On duty 16, 1987, the Design Review
Zomra ee er c"k; ro`fstoy, Coleman) oeiginally review-ad the
proposal. At that time, the Coomittee did not approve the
project and recd mended the following revisions:
1. era architectural concept should be revised to
prrvide more traditional forts and greater
detailing,
2. Carports should be redesigned with gable or hip
roof elements to tie into the building
architecture.
v
W3
PLANNING Ct>F9 ISSION STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -42 - KOTOfF
October 24, 1987
i Page 3
3.:.Break up the long, straight drive aisles with
Landscaped offsets.
4. Provide decorative, metal (non -view obscuring)
fencing at open space areas to break up the
perimelter block wall.
5. A sound attenuation wall along Base Line should
have berGed landscaping and should be offset.
6. Textured pedestrian crossings should be provided
in the drive aisles.
7. Textured pavegent should be provided at main
intersections.
Subsequently, the applicant revised the plans to provide a
Spanish architectural .Veme and incorporate other changes
recommended by the Oes,gn Review Committee. These plans were
then submitted for`Design Review Committee consideration on
Ara September 3, 1987. At that time, the Committee (Emerick,
Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed the plant ar~J recommended approval
subject to the following conditolons:
1. The site plan should be revised to include:
a. The central intersection on the west side
of the site should be shifted to the east
to provide a physical and visual break in
the drive aisle.
b. Greater curvature should be provided in
the east and west drive aisles at the
norl4iern portion of the site to break up
sight line.
c. Landscaping should be provided adjacent
to the emergency access at the southeast
corner to obscure the visibility down the
east drive aisle.
d. A visual corridor should be provided from
Base Line Road to the central open space.
2. The lattice fencing ort`the ground floor should be
replaced with a low stucco wall and wrought iron
fencing. Extensive shrub planting should be
installed adjacent to the wrought iron fencing to
provide privacy for the patio areas.
PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT REEitIEW 85-42 - KOTOFF
October 14, 1987
Page 4
E
3. The lattice railing on the second floor balcony
should be replaced with wrought iron.
4. The mass of the posts supporting the balcony
should be indreaspd.
S. A multi layered facia should be provided at the
eave line.
6. Stucco plant -ons should be pr -ivided around the
windows on the outside of the balcony posts.
7. A trellis should be provided on the side
elevations. The trellis should be consistent
with the architectural theme of the buildings.
Following the last Design Review Committer meeting, the
applicant revised the plans again to include the latest
comments. These plans have been included in this staff report
as exhibits.
C. Historic Preservation Committee: On October 1, 1987, the
Historic reserva on oo* a reviewed a request to designate
the mature oak terse located on the northern portion of the site
as a significant landmark. Based on the public input received
and the applicant's desire to preserve the oak tree, the
Committee recommended that the tree be designated as a
significant landmark. The Committee also stated that no
landscaping should be installed under the drip line of the tree
which would require add'tional irrigation thereby altering the
present amount of wafer being received by the tree. In
addition, the Committee stated that the walkways should be
realigned so as not to infringe into the drip Tine area of the -
tree. The applicant has indicated that this area will be used
as a tot lot witi; material provided that will not require
additional irrigation. The exact details of this will be
reviewed by the, City Planner during the plan check of the final
landscape and irrigation plans.
D. Tree Removal PMnit• Associated with the development of this
s e, tne .2pplica n as submitted a Tree Removal Plan for the
removal of seve►.-al trees located within the future right -of -way
of Base Line Road, Dua to the proposed widening of Base Line
Road, these trees ''►;''have to be removed. Therefore, staff
recommends that those trees being removed be replaced with
specimen size trees as approved by the City Planner. In
addition, as was previously mentioned, the existing oak tree
located at the northern portion of the site will be prr- grved.
F q
_1
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-42 - KOTOFF
October 14, 1987
Page 5
w
i
f
E. Enviromental Assessment: In completing the environmental
c eF s , s as en ified that the site may be subject to
significant noise levels from Base Line Road. As a result, an
acoustical analysis has been ,Prepared which indicates that the
units adjacent to Base Line Road will be subjected to noise
levels in excess-.-?f maximum City standards. The report
indicates, however; 'that the ,noise levels can be reduced to a
less than significant level by providing a Eh foot sound
barrier along the patios facing Base Line Road and by providing
a 0i foot sound barrier on the decks facing Base Line Road.
With the inclusion of these recommendations as conditions of
approval, staff feels that a Negative Declaration can be
issued. If the Planning Commission concurs with these
findings, then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be
appropriate if the project is approved.
III. FACTS FOR FINOIRGS: The project is consistent with the General
Plan an eve olxge' ni Code. The project, with the added mitiga"on
measures, will not be detrimental to the public health, or safety,
or cause nuisances or significant adverse; environmental impacts.
In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the
AIL recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with the
applicable provisions of the Devel, pment Code and City standards.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been adver'Ised in the Daily Report
newspaper as a public hearing and notices were sent to all property
owners within 300 feet of the project site.
V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve eve o`pment Review $5 -42 through adoption of the attached
Resolution with conditions, approve Tree Remova! Permit 87 -67 and
issue a Negative Declaration.
Res p fully itted,
Bra Bu er
City P anner
BB:SM:te
Attachments: Exhibit "A° - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Building Elevations
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
{"" -
.CARYN
PLANNED
- COMMUNItY.
Q LM { FC
Y ICTORI ❑ PL. NNE
�1 LM Dili
y.
Vpc.
❑
)M1 UNITY n, .
RRRRRR
ti
I C
LM 0 R
01C,
V.P.C. El 1
M i tea' a
fc
R
.�,sil ❑
Y.P.C.
on
Mm
COMMUNITY
it
GC
V;P.Cl e.s.P.
M)RTt i
CITY C'
RANCHO CUCk.Njo.NGA
ITEM, mac' to!5 -. ,elz
TITLE- !�r 4aT V
EXHIBIT- --:!I— SCALE.
F
rues
CITY OF
Jq RANCHO CUCk.NJO.N-G�j
PLANNING DINTSO ;
zkr.�
V
INK *TI i
ITEM, Q9 -
TITLE: AV-4V
EXHIBIT: SCALb---
J
P
CITY OF
RANCHO CLIGM"JONGA
PLANNING DIVISUN
TfTLE.-
EXHIBIT. e-1 -scALE.
F-S
Wl
01
�--`- -
r
i■i�iu iin �+ ��� '1� -
VA.
t
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 85 -42 FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF 168 APARTMENTS ON 9.03 ACRES OF LAND IN
THE MEDIUM-HIG�W RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED ON THE WTH
SIDE OF BASE 'SINE ROAD, 550 FEET EAST OF DAY C1.EEK
MINNEL - APN: 227 - 091 -21
A. vitals.
(i) William Kotoff has filed an application for the approval of
Development, Review No. 85-42 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinaft6i- in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is
referred to as "the application ".
(ii) On the of 14th of October, 1987, the Planning Commission of
the pity of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a Weting on the application and
conclyded said meeting on that date.
(iii) All IegaT,;- prerequisites to the (idoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga uz:_lollows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Para A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced meeting on October 14, 1987, including written and
oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
!a) The application applies to property located on the north
side of Base Li- 550 feet east of Day Greek Channel with a street
frontage of 34" /,det and lot depth of 1130 feet and is presently vacant; and
(b) The property to the north, south, east, and west are
designated for residential uses. The property to the north, south and eat is
presently vacant. The property to the west is developed with a fire station.
(c) The proposal, with the recommended conditions of approval,
complies with the minimum development standards of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
(d) The development of 168 apartments is consistent with the
Medium -High Residential land use designation of the General Plan.
KAltti A CM =N RVOL t1DN ND.
DEYElUi�N iiT'tEY1& t 5= - kOTDF°F
tktober',A, 1987
Page 2
3 Basel# upon the substantial evidence presoted to this Commission
during the�ve- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings bf facts
set forth,,,in ��bragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows
That the proposed project is consistent with
the objectives of the General Plan; and
(b} That the proposed use is in accord wit`f the
objective of the Development Code and the
purposes of the district in which the site is
located:; and
(c) That the proposed use is in cr. *Hance with
each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Codex and
(d) That the proposed use, together with the
cond!tions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties
or improvements in the vicinity. ,-
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to
each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions attache6 heveto and incorporated herein by this reference,
A. Planning Division
1. The following items shall be incorporated into
the final landscape and irrigation plan which are
subject to review and approval by the City
Planner prior to the issuance of building
permits:
a. A perimeter wall/'fence with pilasters
shall be required around the site.
Decorative, non -view obscuring fencing
shall be provided at open space areas.
fie remainder of the fence shalt be
constructed of a decorative raterial
consistent with the architectdre of the
units.
I::-: l d
11
PLANRlf i CClFit TSUOR Riw5MMON iii.
DEVELOPMERT REVIEW 8SA2 - KOTOFF
October 14, 1987
Page 3
b. Landscaping shall be provided adjacent to
the emer cy access at the:, southwest
corner of e site to o curs visibility
down the drive aisle.
c. A visual corridor shalt be provided from
Base Lint Road to the central open space,
d. The oat tree at the northern portf." of
the site shall be, preserved in place. No
landscaping or irrigation shall be
installed withir, the drip line of the
tree. the sidewalks shall be maligned
to an area outside the drip line of the
tree.
2. A final acoustical analysis �411 be submitted to
ensure that noise levels` - -Ao not txceed the
maximum permit by Cade. The building plans shall
be revised to incorporate necessary mitigation
wasur�es. The report and the plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the City planner prior
to the issuance of building permits.
3. A trellis consistent with the architectural theme
shall be provided on the side elevations. The
plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City
planner prior to the issuance of building
permits.
4. The trees located within the Base Line right -of-
way shall be replaced in the new streetscape
setback, area with the largest nursery grown trees
available as determined by the City Planner.
S. The trash enclosure closest to the oak tree shall
be relocated to the end of tte carport across the
driveway aisle to the southeAst.
5. The sound attenuation wall along Base Line shall
be offset and softened with berted landscaping.
B. Engineering Division
1. Easements for reciprocal use over and across all
drive aisles and access paints within the projdct
in favor of the properties located to the east
and west of the project site shall be provided
prior to issuance of building permits..
1.
XANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DEVELOPPiENT REVIEW 85.42 - KOT'OFF
October 14, 2987
Page 4
2. Pon agreement and suety shall be provided for the
removal of the temporary, access and, replacement
of street improvements when permanty' access to
the crest is provided on Base line Goad.
Permane�t access to the area shall be provided at
A mini of 800 feet from the centerline of
proposed ay Creek Boulevard.
This project is located within a Zane *9 Flood
HAzard Area due to the possible overflow from pay
rrreeek Channel. Final plans shall not be accepted
for review nor building and grading ;thaits
issued until Prase II of the Day Creek Channel
project is under construction.
4. Storm 4rain pipe and catch basins shall be
constrdt ed an Base Line Road to connect to the
Day Creels Channel to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
5. An in, -lieu fee for one -half the cost of the
construction, including landscaping and
irrigation., for the Mt. -Ian islan4 u,t Base Line
Road shall be paid to :the City .prior to the `
issuance of buildink4,_permits. The fee ;shall be
based on the len th of tht! Base Line Road
frontage of the project, the amount to be
determined by the City Engine+- -
6. rie existing overheaId utilities
(telecommunications and electrical) an the
prcmiect side of Base Line Road shall be
unddrl."rounded from the first polc:offsite east of
the east project boundary to tAe first pole
offsite west of the west project boundary, p;-:"Or
to public improvefnt acceptance or rczupancy,`
whichever occurs first. ReImbursement of one-
ha "f the City adopted cost for undergroundirg
from future development as it occurs on the
opposite side of the street is feasible because
the property is undeveloped,
6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission 'shall certify to the
adoption of this Resolution.
0
11
PLANNING Ct��T5SI0N RESOLUTION ND.
DEVELOPMENT ROIEW 85-42 KeTOFF
October 14, 1987
' Page 5
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTgBP, 1957.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO,CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. Mc e , a rman_
ATTEST:
BrId Ru I I er, epu y Mc retary
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning C Mis!�?.on of the Q-'rty of
R.nrho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was du�y and
regu;arly introduced and _dopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga-;,.it a regular Meeting of the Planning Commission held
qn the 14th day of October \; 1987, by the fallowing mote- to -wlt.t
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMYSSTONER$
ABSENT: CONi;ISSIONERS:
k
ID`S$
A miivV #ws f,` MY�y� F w _o
Yi. NuY w J�[^G�Ay�y
Yy�. C �'MCL }
6Ctl rd'C aN Tw N
gY4L
$'Zak Qr'vr� °ir you �v
Yu$K9i tiz i' g�c� fi =q��yyapp,
Yh fC
MI iy YA.Y0 6 qc a x
Q •C`'a�C�q ±' � MIZ. vM0 V!O ib y�4 u yisi
q p P Y eQ G
�Mpp L ep'iyy pp SYYty p 0�{O • Y^ ! Y1 . • �. r ,y'�� Y5�{I � V py .4� C p jti -s �
:
liT
MS �1Y y.
y l+
4i M t o tv s
�y`'�O�`=^��3�.� G''isA��� 1�wL N~ V,S ^y��Y��qv.�V.,\ ,��jp�p�N •�.
+YiN•4. ^J EOp s�L. AM D tea. FLG "
W N
a
z
of
0
V
g ° & -��«
W » V N y Y
W i+YL o i4 � yy
Luz
cl w°
I'll
4ar3;�c4��. CYOF6�N�N
•r
3E 9VL edY y a aLiab iAON C Li`a Y
Dr y�{'CC Y t
I(t(j�����j} y (9 LN Y CGi C.n=: •'�� � Nypjji .' d^
Cq DA�ie�, L.C� O LOL;
M {.
��CP1JM..r vywOL OCO > �IM_� ^� ;O
� 'uC UD�IN U b� f' .VC. .Lap+•a4ai l i Yp!!^i�s Jkp+'C±'.s+ se'�"'i�pn � Ou7v�.- Napv s' o ie�§�� L o
rMO
Pa sY
g
.�r,
•s *gypw°C nia 2�
ppDjL �Yr:p Njy1
9atl Y�CG Y!9��a15 MS. +�CLV V+• -a$. a.. Yi
Mf7{{yp,
YLrUip M�MIi L�
�yWV��6yfCNa Oj~� >1Yci ^ _ww OL
xd{ C 2�v C�` ■MM,�C Y`L
LCY OI 1. p`!c'� Vys �V yL{iYD�O 6�a »Y.wT OyYO q�N. YC4 wi�)sC AQ
� ^r 1+ Y9\.y `a REy�� Lr�`Ip }� � ■C »ay° �y }`�ppM C LP i« O•
+C+y�°1M °'�'.vC�Y _sUssNr¢CM�M /C i_Y YL/. tQ�Yi sYCL C�yN Uttz- ^COOy VLC N Ly
I 1 I
u
l
Unit o N
I� O� C V 5� � +� a Z�
V G 4U iq �n .0
N aY e wtr 3 �wsM.a r s o L i �NL ma� .r yY N U* . �CNC � U r» aq . � L ' � N Ii t y
A Fix V%j r � r
S &m — yf e J
{ e. ; 4 g °
»�t
6 —2 s C i. ®$ Y V .0 ; ry�° S �tw»Y S LLY j
aa� vsCi na 9— 529
�
� .6.
ae� YaL�" . yw••°'v "O °+
vii r6 +,a �.tsi 7$$ 9Z9 IS 'Q '�r.��s'�� is y�I o ,� y. Luigi
eM �N jp� r1C 012i I° O M, M`� ■U
yV V C yUYw G
9CC CCy^" M v� L V�iWQY �{t
de
W �lwNiN� � �L bO:ps
fir..!`. t pp 9 v �w3
SU L LOS �G.0 �9 p ju— ,CC�`�,z =y ~N KT +LVw
5. C A S i s M C N C p y i Y p i S �y Miv �L1• w
YENO
by �7S O =ia W1 y 9g= XMy`yGy �S ySyt 3'I o ° i^�1.4 Mr�tl`CC r�C y�
9a�a r--f' � plc a Lyu..` q�3 OA 9 Mi�q} YEN pil.
N�Vy ww Vp SI '° CY6. �p�s ^ ■� `_N N. WMY�r�`'•� `I ���r�q �s Ue�
v l D M J V L v_«
b. 'i yL i C° MQ LYi Oy•� �r • MsU. �O N
3~ '! yU C V tl U v� N C C
ago— Va! YN�' oO ¢y�C V ++O.aA
{N{� T �i ,MC M L Y VC C N yY p U w OI L 9 i �www.....�� ♦ Q.N.' M M y n i • T O v
v� OiG IC t' NM °1q Y6w ■. UL aL �N V9 M. _jpip VaUt �C aMr ID py lClr
�4 C D r�is LgM� L� 4 V '� • YN 4 L » V L.0 0
y ys vy
M I�,i ND 4r°uVi Nq 'RYMV O.4ii MYLTogi 6L
N
man
4-;S a
BE E�—
gg;
of 9r u
So.
vi
Z-2
Ml- VE J-1 J-1. 2"
WN -.1 E SH-q li 3ill
jt _.Xi-s,izEs !]USE 23 f-�si
Q,Q -k
zt
PIzz .51
toe--n %3: 3:
-. " 'S I
P r , -go --i A N
z
lit
O. Ac
-.c Sc
5.
o.:
i,: -c .2
. 94" YQO 4
-W.
9s.
iv Z 7- !
c .2 1
: I F- .;
a
;,z
J -C
F ill z- Jl So
pp 20
c
lid 0
iE.-C t--j .3 gel
5 1 i'M Ot-0.2,
r�Y iyst .N nA u4r Q� ¢A�H \��sa a arppe L�r
C� Y �� w a� C � S.i�r.• $' b � S �• .�<; G V o�.7i t�:. e'.,`
cAe. fla ,.. �z Y�+ a nd YC a yam.
Y�eeja Mys •�v N$ai
W
t/1 � �. ppYppp ✓ GIN. ``tttttS � kYU+y�. O � � _ n N lCCil a N �I N V..r
OZa
a. g$v
�� °3'i •°� �Cm�•rpOf,.'�_ nYn`�`L� ,c� +uy Y »a YEN. a ��
LLY n� YOC �yY�" .l,,.O y }S _� M SSN■ �C +�6 ��� ^y'i�+ 'p �V
+y�
88 $NY
A Y I lei p S 3 1 qV� rC
WTrM AMLQ,7Q N V lift! mrep W
S + C Y �■f
C�NO� }a�M- MY"' y�� yV� CptlpC 'r
V «C� r-- Lr+ w�4(� A W OY-is P C
NOErg& ��C Y P aV6C
LCCCY CS' NCYYS �w94 �p�L NCP ,�C � T�6�� >�4yII_
VOy>y Y�� 6YVY.G N P yvn,L
S.x r
�SV. �CLp.Y SPt►N6 �M4 N gVa'
y � N
„lUs e'.s a'r1 s� cync
ocsL ay! u .Y.M �€yN a7 Pigti 'w' Ys '8 �L M!
1.3
r�jy�oNa > -S ey .Y T �' u N
p � w� LN
!
SM r M* O Q O JPp H� OV>G!
^ >9 4S 441CC i GKa
$g'ae ff P` 5 e.8,2
�Pt'c6 a' y° y n +t Y c� ai �e'ZC .Iit, a
t1 Tj Nt}.w. ��pp 12;5 .0 �- Vy.y Ya 4
YL V 3r. W }. _L'~ Y >Y! q6 rN +i+.� V V
^•F�w® ��. 9• NNA . AIM >w�'w Y°�w
N {'yi i CM "�Y'{ 1 S Y N `^ C ✓ L "i « y� +' o.r' r.: a Y L a
sit N e s =Pq `Y Nyy y �w� ~�L
a
C> N A 6 C 8NM
sCYCL�11 N eG��� Wppm Vy.
ysii 0 1i g 741 0 N Vs aE Yww YA V
Swr. NwO
�w Yw 1i.. y 6l.BY. s W •Wawa! Gq� i_C �' yAOarpS YA9
yyyyV wpaN i; _9 N. N�y QV ,CO wgM b ���C'V�. >C� uy i+ C
Ytla S�4 r. w Y yrd COIr� ^ 00o 3N J L 6 y 'O 1 �90wY.
Guviw. u 4i'j. E'i IV-B
� 1!I
E s x .9— a
qw cc x O W .! ,�N •, y
.'V3
v i o .r
OV y'NS$i 61i YO. tlYyYy�! V O �yy �M �VY tj�
t 0, — _"j
a* S gt r' braar �-.
& $ 3r"aq ES
Yx x il 'h qM4 -0 �
AO� y.QOfppQ6.���M�...,'ITp. +a.itlL pO V}}}..
VN�u y-F •yyY �w. '`
q YY.a wLp Y•¢ YNNj.W ■f /y ■a N Y W .Y CL1 y +��g 7w YY
YY
`° +�G ,4 GD.iC���ssC i agM1 LO HY p Yp Mp Yp �ti "� � NG7�L rC
M1 F, y�N`�}� �9
SAY w �i 'L N Y '" 1. �r u +'i i t �i
Ki
0
g`.f81�
° Y oaW S I 7r r- tl 1! LR p
if u
Y
O.^ M
!As Yid Y
k46_ g` �Q= 8 C7 2c C YI _,- L
1i
C�
Y6
iz
�' � Ht1 45�i3� ."`g��R
® pin It
_Ow__
�4 Y'C' ^O61 � a0*i1 � 4�0• Ya LW tl i Y 4FM � OL
ee. � � p � Y
NL Avq ..v ��OI dS � O N y+ � _ ��Y4 YxYC w -to6
SIL
ie•i3tpc�� ON -9
`��u' x0. CNtl�9w 7 ZIT Q�a+YY7
y N Y py 'a' Yoh Va ttp F3. yC q `a1 N �4 }y�ut*cO
ygft +O tlV �Ytl �. S YM tlVM�n
xo 3n LL7as t�F�iOV tSi$ '.i'�p g�n.r a.°
`:I
l i
2C
v
11
cS Oi Y ..1 ; Pl
J
rv^
1
1
Sz; fuV A
QV
wW
MYEL
Q,�wVp.
A.
n
pp
>O�Y
E
L�It
C
E°m ^5
¢p. Ow
r �
l lr
V
pA.NtO
C «Y
E
�L
;SYp
G
rC•
z:
ILs
w
°
C ID
+O.
✓�L
yyb
��
4 �f
Y4 p 1
— 0 - --
■
g
If
CYr
�M
V�M
vyO
-2 °w
r
\�
w
�Yar
XX.
i
�!g
MyY..
iY
0
ONN�CO
H
.On
2
' "
~
M.06G
Cf
O
0..
ey■ Qp.'°.
o
u Y l
3AN
J
ywp
W »V
S l -A
Ey
r! Aj *! \ e• u1
!o
V I w
-cL
i
ccard
O�y
CV
4s�u
g.S
pC�y
M
R
>
O
L
A
M�4YY
6z
w_g
NYYC
+CO
,C{ C■
_Y n�
0
�•i�
M1
l��{a�
a3
�.
A
C ybY
$nCQC
tL
O��YLy
q
I�•�yyyy
1
w9t
pM ��16rI
4�•y �))}}SY.
R
>_
aCC
i
O1lYCCC
~iw•5
ii`
Y
y V-
V j
i 4
"'C
O'�
Y
�CC
V
u�I.
Q
.0 .Mw'rV`�Z
■ h
sv
V'F
!
� ^,�
�y
a�
O
C2
�a
V
Va
I. tl+ttY L
�O�MIl.
l
17Q
O tl yi
�YYlr ai\F
r M
RV
V G
Or
Y~~ i L ypu(� Y
j
WcI.NL14V
i�
ljja�a
f.10
<1a....'i�
��
r
ci
\1 \Y
1
cS Oi Y ..1 ; Pl
J
rv^
1
1
Sz; fuV A
QV
wW
41�
Mr
>O�Y
�L
pp".EV.
L�It
C
E°m ^5
4t
r �
l lr
V
t O
C «Y
E
�L
;SYp
IV
z:
ILs
w
°
rj�
+O.
✓�L
yyb
��
4 �f
Y4 p 1
— 0 - --
■
�O
4M
CYr
�M
V�M
vyO
-2 °w
°Y�yC
\�
w
19.
pp'g tv
R W
Etay�
8
Tw�
�6L
°r...E^
L9
~
M.06G
�QtyS�'O
V Y�I �
Z
Y
C4 M
u Y l
3AN
J
�4,E
W »V
S l -A
Ey
r! Aj *! \ e• u1
!o
V I w
-cL
cS Oi Y ..1 ; Pl
J
sp d La
Y. ILiO Y
Loy a�
Yy Y l 3
Y M 9 ^ K
¢eY ry..p
b tM
'�.rde� �i! g�,•�°tr
wldy
A o. IIU Roo
v
E I
rv^
1
1
Sz; fuV A
QV
Mr
>O�Y
�L
pp".EV.
L�It
C
E°m ^5
4t
r �
l lr
yw
�L
;SYp
IV
z:
ILs
w
°
oal
4 �f
Y4 p 1
— 0 - --
■
LL
CV~
a
V�M
vyO
sp d La
Y. ILiO Y
Loy a�
Yy Y l 3
Y M 9 ^ K
¢eY ry..p
b tM
'�.rde� �i! g�,•�°tr
wldy
A o. IIU Roo
v
E I
`I
rv^
Sz; fuV A
QV
Mr
>O�Y
�L
pp".EV.
L�It
C
E°m ^5
4t
r �
l lr
yw
�L
;SYp
IV
z:
ILs
w
°
oal
4 �f
Y4 p 1
— 0 - --
■
LL
CV~
a
V�M
vyO
-2 °w
°Y�yC
\�
w
19.
pp'g tv
R W
~erg l"
Tw�
�6L
°r...E^
L9
L
V •
M.06G
�QtyS�'O
V Y�I �
�y40.
µL«
ppp
dya
�4,E
W »V
utaWw.-
<QW
r! Aj *! \ e• u1
!o
Z; =
i
Hp* V
IX &
`I
3 L
pn � NL Q1
s
iT k _4L
+w G
n �
W
�O CV
Yyy d
yC r
O� ►�3
fff111!
�
Y ►M �lllp'
4btN " L
$wd O�VO
wy rus
Yip yu„w�
nu Nr
�$x 7gCe�
4
L Y n M
v V Qp
r.. oY ►y
ev i €$
�` �ayY•
L �
Cr al grsu
O V Y C
Y N L Q
�YAQ
E
M+ A
a ��L
�v ► V V M s
-.N=
ui .a
Y +^
CON b
Y
i3+
» 0 = y
e C L
Y� M
VV N
i c
E
E ►r" O
:0L
i
its,
�Ny L
'so— r'
lTrr 54,
eeva a0`1
21-5 f
w G�
e N x5
<w 1.5 a a
b
sal
NYW
N
Y
6f
a
•
Ali
y
s
L
LLY
�
r
M
.
co
L Y
L iii
y
M • L
L
«
N
E
Ca
r�tl
aQa
ret
o
\'I
Lam= ra ►
05i grs 'O
CC `�
e -5,0ii 1 N
J vs.
Iy� _C i
arL `pp• lfG� yVy
p7a ��H L
uiw ';,Yap �o
zz
y r r L'v
Im
E
!'ITV ^T, h A ATl1'[TA ITT^ A sfffllTll A
J�
0
DATE:
TO:
i-ROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
vaa a va ivi Y. iiv V a.,t V�1L.1VLlVr1
STAFF REPORT
October 14, 1987
Chairman and hers of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Scott Murp*,""Associate Planner
�SMENT AND <YESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13115
- en�,,un Uun„i&m-flum_�`A res en a su n v s on a
es gn review o 7=3ngle family lots on 2.54 acres of
land in the Vfte Low Residential District (less than 2
dwelling units; ppp�r acre), located on the north side of
Jennet Street, ✓,est of Sapphire Street - APN: 1062-011 -
02. ^
1 1;�
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPT1&:
A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map, site plan, and
issuances Negative Declaration.
B. Project Density: 1.57 dwelling units per acre
C. Surrounding Lan6l!A ;And Tonin : `
North - ingle airy Residentia?; Very Low Residential (less
than 2 dwellinT:units per aOi)
South Proposed Single Family Residential; Very Low
Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre)
East - Single Family Residential; Very Low Residential (less
than 2 dwelling units per acre)
West - Proposed Single Family Residential; Very Low
Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre)
D. General Plan Designations:
Project blTe - very LOW (Residential (less than 2 dwelling units
per acre)
North - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per
ccre)
South - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per
acre)
East Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per
acre)
West - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per
acre)
ITEM G
\ i
c 4Mws
• � •Amt+ .
•
� Xs
�SMENT AND <YESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13115
- en�,,un Uun„i&m-flum_�`A res en a su n v s on a
es gn review o 7=3ngle family lots on 2.54 acres of
land in the Vfte Low Residential District (less than 2
dwelling units; ppp�r acre), located on the north side of
Jennet Street, ✓,est of Sapphire Street - APN: 1062-011 -
02. ^
1 1;�
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPT1&:
A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map, site plan, and
issuances Negative Declaration.
B. Project Density: 1.57 dwelling units per acre
C. Surrounding Lan6l!A ;And Tonin : `
North - ingle airy Residentia?; Very Low Residential (less
than 2 dwellinT:units per aOi)
South Proposed Single Family Residential; Very Low
Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre)
East - Single Family Residential; Very Low Residential (less
than 2 dwelling units per acre)
West - Proposed Single Family Residential; Very Low
Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre)
D. General Plan Designations:
Project blTe - very LOW (Residential (less than 2 dwelling units
per acre)
North - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per
ccre)
South - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per
acre)
East Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per
acre)
West - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per
acre)
ITEM G
\ i
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 13715 - Walton Construction
October 14, 1987
Page 2
MKI
E. Site Characteristics: The site is presently developed with a
single am y res nce at the northeast portion of the site.
The hese gains access off of Jennet where it presently
terminates. The property has an average slope of roughly 6%
from north to south.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 5 lots ranging'
in size` from 20,578 square Meet to 36,113 square feet if;
area. The average lot size aAtg in the tract will be 25,E
square'feet in area. The applicant is proposing to intPg'rate
this tract into Tract 10344 (the •Thoroughbred Tract "f, The
applicant is proposing to develop the lots with the same floor
plans and elevations A,proved for the Thoroughbred Tract.
7nesie units include the Gary Miller homes currently existing in
the "Thoroughbred Tract ". Exeter Court will be finished to
allow access to two lots. Lot 5 will continue to takF�-. access
to the southwest and the configuration of the lot has been
changed from that appr";!d for Tract 10349 to provide: a more
traditional shape and more usable area. The existing single
family residence will be retained on a flag lot w4th access to
Jennet Street.
B. Desiggnn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Emerick,
McNTei, Coleman reviewed the proposal on September 17, 1987
and recommended approval subject to the following annditions:
1. All roof materials should be tile.
2. Corer side elevations should be upgraded to match the
fran elevations.
3. Detailing should be provided around all windows on all
elevations.
4. The area between garage doors should be treated in a
similar fashion as the ends of the garage facade.
5. The driveway on lot 2, the flag lot, should be limited to
12` in width at the south property line and flaring out
within the site,
C. Trails Advisory Committee: The Committee reviewed the project
on eptember X 1981 and recommended approval of the
development as proposed by the applicant including a 15'
Community Trail along the north tract boundary and a local
equestrian running',.rrth -south from the north tract boundary to
Jennet Street.
�Y�
PLANNING, COl MMI — 0�.VAFF 'REPORT
TT 137'15 - Vital ton ;Construction
October 14, 1587
Page 3
D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the
n ronmen ec s and found no significant dverse
environm&s Z.l iatpacts as a result of this project. 'if the
Planning /�olmission concurs with these findings, issuance of a
Negative Declaration would be appropriate if the tentatir
tract map is approved.
Ill. FACTS FOR 011, GS: The project is consistent with the General
an gnu we ev = opment Code. The project, with the added
mitigation lWsures, will not be detrimental to the public health
or safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental
impacts. In addition, the proposed use , -and site plan, together
with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with
the applicable provis8ons of the Development code and fifty
Standards.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily _Report
newspaper as it public hearing and notices were setst to all property
pertyy
owners within 300 feet of the project site.
V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve TentatIve Tract Map 131155 through adoption of thrr attached
Resolution with conditions and issue a Negative Declaration.
ulI omitted,
/Riestf
l er
nner
BB:SM :vc
Attachments : Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "6" - Subdivision Map
Exhibit "C" - Site /Gral'mg Plan
Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
i 9
CITY (F rrF.\ 1:
RX ►G CUGkNjo%A TITLE. QNE •
PLANNING DJN'ISM EXHIW: -4 -SCALL,
El
MVaAwAwraaAMaa.alaaaiw�a p�•�ae ~� •yfLav
� 1
1
t � � ,.rye. ; �'� �.. • � f
It I
>
CITY OF -
RANCHO Ct�` , Trrl.E-
G5
n.ra
:X)RTt i
t �
.t
77{{ •1 '
• � 1. � r• � , +i+. , �� _ • a � �` = f �. i i
•t
CITY OF
RANCHO CUlCkNjO.NGA
PLAti t NC`, D, IN'IS)()N.l EXt- INT, --g::! T SC ALL; _
G
rl
CITY OF ITEM, —
RANCID CUCAMONGA TITLE-
PLANNING ,D('VIRM EXHIBIT, dp°/ SCALE-
" f
s
CITY OF ITEM, —
RANCID CUCAMONGA TITLE-
PLANNING ,D('VIRM EXHIBIT, dp°/ SCALE-
" f
! q t ♦ ,
t
t ( t
ii
Jr
l
CITY CE
tTEit= ;?9- ��
PLANNING DIi'ISK)N EXHIB!T= = Z SCALE
lu
gal
CITY OF ITEM.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE-
PLANNIM3 DfArLSK)N EXHIBIT.,, SCALL
t
r '
•
N
v-
-�;Y � •
irk
CITY OF ITEINI:
R, N CUCkNjO NGA TITLE:
PLANNING DIVSK). ,
EXHIBIT. �? � ALE:
G1�a
h
°_ter
L
CITY OF
A.Nk'UO C i,! IC�:rA TITLE=
PLANNING DINPISM
SCrALE�
x---01
ap1R,
k
v3 a�
f
ft
ap1R,
k
v3 a�
f
'1+..
i^ . ^ -
RESOLUTION NO.
�v
A RE9)LUTION OF IME Pti ANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY 7
RANCHO C11CAMONGA APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
NO. 1371 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 5 gINGLE LOTS ON 2.54
ACRES OF LAND IN 'TIDE VERY LOW �,!4
IDENTIAL DISTRICT
LOCATED )OR THE NORTH SIDE OF JEN STREET, WEST OF
SAPPHIR�1' STREET - APN: 1062 - 011 -02
A. Recitals.
(i) Wclton Construction has filed an application for'the approval
of Tentative Tract Map No. 13715 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map
request is referred to as the application".
(ii) do the 14th of October, 1987, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it i-, hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced public hearing on October 14, 1987, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located on the north
side of Jennet Street, west of. sapphire Street with a street frontage of 171
feet and lot depth of 386 feet and is presently improved with single family
residence; and
(b) The property to the north, south, east and west are
designated for residential uses. The property to the north and east is
developed with single family residences. The property to the south and west
is presently vacant.
c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval,
complies, with all minim= development standards of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Trails end therobject The objectives of the Equestrian OverlayeDist with Master Plan of
PLANNING C"ISSION REWUTION N0.
TT 13715 - Walton Construction
October 14, 1? ?7
Page 2
(e) The development of 5 single fawily lots on t.5�; -acres is
coPy�Stent with the Very Lox Residential land use desigpation of the General
Plan;
3- Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
Burin >tbe above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
fa'-.t'57' set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That tentative tract is consistent with the
General Plan, Development Code, .a+nd specific
plans; and
(b) The design or, improvements of the tentative
tract is cons ?stent with the General Plan,
Development Code, and specifi: plans; and
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed; and
(d) The desigfi of the subdivision is likely to
cause substantial environmental damage and
avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or
their habitat; and
A e) The tentative tract is likely to cause serious
public health problems; and
(f) The design of the ,tentative tract will not
conflict with any easement acquire% by the
public at large; now of record, ,for access
through or use of the property within the
proposed subdivision. _
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
S. Based 1, 2 and 3 above, thisnCormi siofindings ereby approves the application nsubjectato
each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
A. Planning Division
1. The following items shall be incorporated into the final
building plans which shall be reviewed and approved by the
City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits:
a. All roof materials shall be tile.
6-43
PLANNI?4;'cO MISSWN RESOLUTION No.
TT 1371 %. ^ tidal ton Construction
october,%, 1987
Page 3
b. Corner sfde elevations shall be upgraded to YtAch the
. „; front elevations.
3. Exeter rourt shw,J be constructed as a half street with a
minimum of 26 feet of pavement.
4. Drainage facilities to drain City streets, Jennet Street
and Exeter Court, shall be constructed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
5. A 15' Community Trail shall be dedicated along the
northerly property lines of lots 1 and 2.
6. Drainage easements and drainage facilities necessary to
drain the Community Trail and the flows entering the
project from the north shall be prov,�ied and shall be
de=lineated or noticed on the final map.;)
6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission s %all certify to the
adoption of this Resolution.
_i
c. Detailing shalt be provided around all windows on all
elevations.
d. The area betweei the garage doors shall be treatied in
a similar fartion as the ends of the garage facade.
2.
The driveway on ldt-'2 shall be' limited to 12 feet in width
at the south property lime and gray flare out within the
lot. The site plan shall be reviewed and approv€1 by the
City Planner prior to the issuance of building pemits,
3.
A 15 foot wide Community Equestrian Trail with -offer of
dedication shall be provides! along the north tr. -'-
boundary.
4.
A 15 foot wide local equestrian trail easement shall be
provided from the north tract boundary to Bennet Street as
indicated on the tentative map.
B. "1 Engineering Division
1.
Dedication to complete the standard City cul -de -sac, Exeter
Court, shall be made as shown on the tentative tract map.
2.
Jennet Street shall be constructed from the existing
portion east of the prollect site to the wostside of Exeter
Court to the satisfaction of the City Engineer per street
improvements plans approved for Tract 10349.
3. Exeter rourt shw,J be constructed as a half street with a
minimum of 26 feet of pavement.
4. Drainage facilities to drain City streets, Jennet Street
and Exeter Court, shall be constructed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
5. A 15' Community Trail shall be dedicated along the
northerly property lines of lots 1 and 2.
6. Drainage easements and drainage facilities necessary to
drain the Community Trail and the flows entering the
project from the north shall be prov,�ied and shall be
de=lineated or noticed on the final map.;)
6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission s %all certify to the
adoption of this Resolution.
_i
PLARN04 tTQtWWOR AC ,,UTION NO.
TT 13715 - Walton Cork-ruction
<' October 14, 1987
Page 4 . "
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14T.4 DAY OF OCTOBER, 1987,
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE'ciTY OF RMNO CUCAMOWA
BY:
arry . Mc`Ftiel,Tt�, roan
1.
ATTEST,..)
b '-"'bra a Bul Ter-;--Ue-puty Secretary
1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fdregMng ResoNation was duty and
regularly introduced., passed, and adopted by thr Planning' Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamoiaa, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 14th day of Octobtar, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit:
i AYES: CofflISSIOWERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
W
r 46
ca
yr
0
3a`"d CAI
�4.5zq
p yu {yY
i�S -seN
aN + »Slit
�s
o�g+.
Ov ±44+'NY
It
��� @pp@zN�opa3 C�
�vl
9;
0
c �
p�p
V 1t
Vf
0
S
at g
a', u
M twu
TQ'ppS���� 0'yY �NCai
L Y O i
CY q'�yY
'vL� oaZu�q
gC yu C ^ NC C� Yp
V4V ��` pYYp i L O L
CVY p�Vu�'T+jM
gS
TL
s
171 a$ir
4
�► 1 I I I
,C6 !p�Y• y P �� _IMy�gO�LC�vT
p } � u e 6 O
a Sa �t j H $2 =6 Y�
of 2l
h tl�}` p Vp Y.�•V Or)lC O
rr Lw
Y `ar+P
r &-c
C N p p pO ~O O y v$ NyY + o
V
—.3 S
�fc� a.. Y L I{. »t • 'li! Yyp3
•. N� 'f�i i + 4 ��Ia�NLf•T
n�
o.
�Liy�$tl
Tins
1 13114.12
�`eVyy
YN �q�w� �N Sy..;� •i0�°
Y'" +sue yL'„gwftCP ��o�'�ia�3�
NItsA
Est
0.YVCY �yir'`''�'�Yy ••�L w.ft�i�I �aa6��
d
y y
_s
r
Y
gyg
w+
Cr^ O
A°
J ~ i IIe
« °ao
Y C
a 1
6 O
mb
r�
t
pw �
e�
e.
L +
S
.
S
�sCC
i
Y
Y
v
L`xx
Y
U; I "+I
i
.51
ca
y 51' G N w 6
y Y
�QC� Nw
�YVY
4 QUyy YY
M Lt =lit
O 6 Y
i
.ciys NC yY
W y i
6 Cs Y
w �M
Mt
yC� "
w`ps d�
V y Y +
�ap$�
+
�ywg
N L IL
i
OI =��
Ells
N
YYbA
w
Y
as
.41 N1 '41 " rl
Y
a�
`a
o
ga`
qy■■■
N`w
C �
w�
Q
a�CC
V O
ow
2";
30
q �M
�g
Yf�
� � L > �tV. •M +� I yY N V
L
4oL a +� Ni V _ti ��4 �tl.O NL 1W`
NN
L Y
yti ~Y Z jS.$ i Z-5 ae 2 gi
C i
LP jiLi—i
=e, rye sa ��g ° =1Lt
a Ne.w» N p$
—;a M� 3�Y� �iY 1y�. �C Lyea'� w ^1 ■I CY+ ^ -.s
v ^
gi�SIO�C$�' Sy gy- Zearwcgl.go �u�.$
~�.C.�Q NY YL O�
l7�■ }�ipa w.},
R T} tp,,� y�LI L yyye ^ Y yw L �71---
Y N
fZoo,
^3. NgFi !V .O.I tr37 +�yYG'�i�^6aC nL
Il l l
�f7
C1
1
0
1]
!�3
H
w
w
i
Ec�$ �6 E GCY G0$Os�Yl�1�INM a P= r YL`
4 O Y y�M qS
s��Y �E .= �a � p 2Grs�� .°. ^ice L as I.
"�, TS
JE
Y
ENE:
y y _+
L�YG kk'Ar �Nr MnE gg.NN FE
EMMapt'Wlq�MQ
A. •�Ni
Ate„
g
�.3+i3 w' �`Ra JS MSroLYa:`. i"ii�i so la $p`$� 11 4V L Y 'd.�n N4L SL � � f^r 3L �NA YM •Y' 1. 1.. !._t
L !�Y�l I rZo �,a ♦�y S�•• YY PG. L. Ate. "C
�L�y Eyat Ly�rtp 1 �c G ;1;
jy o ~f �qN �a{ t ^�• �4 rNYi •I�1f�wC �O11y3�N
ah t N M N li .% t NR i M 0
-.2
Q~ �' a L Y IY�I C t •�i
• � YY QQ"�i
iyy. rar
PUS
pp gag•N. ~4 E �� ul yt M p
C
X4 B 1 64 u
zo .25
u
OIL SM y�pVyp,� � '�E� •�� . �+ OYi1{
w `� ''y ctl p
O'Oy y �yb if 54 MY aOst
6X ^ w T.1
s5 'i �`.L3 svN .YaM ty 24 A`our S
M
� n C N. Ml Y all
`I
da. Qq� eyrLlid
arYf4 q\. ,41j �yE
1.3 th
35 2
C$ c4
C i
E 4 Ey
^
Is -3
•3:1 � N Sc
c
C•4 +pia
�p• _ "N ^G
`A L KN W40f{ {:yam.
ae u Iv
f �
J
W
z
a
j
Sz
_ yyyy�� �Nn yC• C _Y
tr6 =`Y�. ■y ■LA
go #M —
w
;o J
V ~ p
.11-4 4133 *�r�µ -.
i Y N1 7w-a �C Y,O
* s i a
HIS
�"n
c�V
.y
sale
.ice
all
S ..
qz-
6•`c
�^,y?y
ia¢g
ny�
N .
w
.�yI2 µ� M {.H
i^ C.: Y H
enf
It
4 = #
w
sOa
Ycp3C
NE
u� �
i °
e+
�� • � g rs i
N �^• w
- fr L
Y
L'aw -3i
O
ary�
�a =r
N H
2: Ai. r b
I
Y�rR
NM
L�r L
3P WJ� a: $
N
�•I
I 11 ^`
�ZOC
N
w
9
g
�� #
■i
emu
L N 1�f
Y
!
01
S.
!!
M
cs £a
v-3
C
V
tl �yy y .i
1:3
W•'Y
Y C
� "�YS � +�Y C
-aa_s
'' w r �.
w iYY. g
a�i N
C
e+. n.`� t
1Yr C
yu.' i
gypp' 5 Y IL �^
V N~� i L
- �y�jµW Y C
a � �
LTV 01 Va�^
i M~ y
y
N. r
� L. Z L ■
j
Sz
_ yyyy�� �Nn yC• C _Y
tr6 =`Y�. ■y ■LA
go #M —
w
;o J
V ~ p
.11-4 4133 *�r�µ -.
i Y N1 7w-a �C Y,O
* s i a
HIS
.fi$pp
N ;A
.y
Hk
+�
3�
6•`c
�Q
`g
a
daO+yCa
&z a
Z
�•g�
3ms£
NE
N= OM
� L
.Ta.�Ln
$gTw`
U
C•
M;eQro
� ��C+1 C•O
�j`
w°
y1 -31
L O�
.' -c'r
OCr
7 i
• 4
�
�ZOC
N
w
�iI
0
c
- -I
yY
La
•O
V�
ZY�
YYC
q`
�Q
`g
a
daO+yCa
a
�•g�
i
.Ta.�Ln
lNgi
N�
•N^'.
�ZOC
•g�..
�.
g
�� #
■i
emu
L N 1�f
0
c
- -I
1
i
¢ 4i
f
r Q.
9
lag
�y4Y Llt���'yy fix D
N�" V.AyO �' eSSVw M C k o rn
- acv ■s4� ~N.. ,� u C 42. N
or—
q` i QN01 M1U ~ p Y�NO. 4. W
AO� Y WSy �yF M."x O �LYg1, a C�O{�j� Ot6S
'W'O p0
�H�^ yMM q�41�� 'Y �YY � +� �` w YW fY � ��. �a• �M RA'M $Y
Its K'
as tO V VO HE
O C
W Y
P \� e
C�
W y
= L
Y
J
�6U qM
C �
_N m�
0 &
t0.
W
i S
A■
a^
O
G
W M
Y.
Le
Y LMY
•�.
IEC
606p
W
His
M Y
L�
epoy
ti = O.
!�fOIR`4¢i.i
pCp ppM>�,
!PL
MH
Yyy6t N G
y, .AL
Q�, W• Gw4x' pz4^
C Y�CO� 9��y ■� �'�pt3 c,y9
4 Y
'�«' i ?x• w�i NYu
y�g�Sn>
T,
Naav
Y�y � LAM �G « «YSiw
�aN C pN q6. wo�NY yp yL
�Y 6 Val Os��f.
G r . "o�p !A.. .�
Y MM
. lI r11 '� NI 4I
tt!
lei
I
C
lC6
u `owe
oVi'
u 4a
O4�
+4
a
yy4 Zak
Y LppL
iC
7 W
N
" Myy
Y
°
Y
vt
Yf qp2
Lit
4N ML31 fi
b�M
Wp H .
YN�M�
b
Y
'w w C
y
o
Q.�
Qp
.9
Np ...CCCa
C .
Vq
G
M
E
L
L»
4
N.r y- y
W
qq
V-
f`.`
u
Mzw
«A
Ki0
�4t
M
}�
y, ~
p
L
p*pyyq�
ii
p
Mti
4 s+
1;
yo
,+i
4
C
V i
N N
Ny�
^K�
N=
N
�✓
�rNg
i .�h
X�C
�� t
�...N
�
is
�y
: w
w
4
�i°aW
wS1
N
1
e10
NS
QLML
A{{1
M3L41ap
24
WX
At
.14
�rw AL.Y
�yN{�aKt
�Nw �jy y�
yYG ��
C! Wy} tl4
i
NW
��
+ryN. YaC�
QM ►
NQ
.{2`10 tiMG
4` ii./
M
iw
�:i
yy
Ww NE=
♦N
i.ii
A `
°
�« C
v
LX
��C y
L n {3
4 Y y
a$ L
J+� 9
u u�
/�O r
�1 NI
vz�t a !1K
an .
it
O4�
+4
a
yy4 Zak
! V
A
7 W
TN
" Myy
Y
h
7C.w.
°
Y
vt
Yf qp2
rN. C�rGW
b�M
Wp H .
O
�y
Lr
L
'w w C
y
o
Q.�
Qp
.9
Np ...CCCa
C .
~8
a
G
M
E
L
L &Y
� �
p
C
S
V-
f`.`
u
Mzw
«A
Ki0
�4t
M
}�
y, ~
p
L
p*pyyq�
ii
p
Mti
4 s+
1;
yo
Y�
Y
C
V i
N N
Ny�
^K�
N=
N
�✓
X�C
�� t
U�,j�
�•
�i°aW
wS1
N
1
( til
l
11
A `
°
�« C
v
LX
��C y
L n {3
4 Y y
a$ L
J+� 9
u u�
/�O r
�1 NI
{ 1
�N■
vz�t a !1K
an .
O4�
yy4 Zak
! V
A
]]]
c.r�
TN
q N y
rN. C�rGW
b�M
Wp H .
O
�y
Lr
L
'w w C
y
o
i
q�ys
LV�
..i3G4
�y
M�iryj.
�Nhi 4/
K4N
{ 1
�N■
vz�t a !1K
an .
-
N
Fw'Kwp
'w w C
y
o
i
q�ys
Yi1 V
x
HS
V-
f`.`
o
y, ~
p
L
p*pyyq�
ii
Rzn`
K ii4t
t
t
I]
Ll
6
4� t
a o
san G?
AQ
�
t L O N
Y O�
LPL �f.
C Y 3ww
p L
4,�pyy YV r
t
� Muni aAON m _
G4 V
LE
L 'C Lys C {�
t•} 6p l
Off' R S Y•r �GqLY Cdr yL
,i �.Y p y, <`w 4 uM� US L'. N� vL.� Y p ME
y9y` ff :;X is «M1 WA oy� a Vpt� vYw
^Q` Y YMC YY `.� GY 'MC $MS NC
^a ~��Y Y� � � ��� 1. Q� �y ��' • �X` V+Y -
-gig.
FNN YY!Nf .$rLUa
^My.�L Y bL LC CL pQ Cl�g4
P V NCE C NYy� 4. Y7�q qY L +Q �y� 6y ICY Mu.
.¢y Y cp1 G R-4
CI Y R^ pl pp LLY Y v "" y« M Q C p. d V Y V Y, H A ti
MY Q.N9V �y
CCTV
�s YL°X..•*.� 'ry {��M S.ri. Qa � y CC gi Ae ���� Te Nat Y�•^-
HAS
-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT `
DATE: October 14, I9� r '
TO: Chairman,and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM, Barrye R. Manson, Senior Civil'Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION: AND MDDIFICATIP _ G'F CONDITIONS FOR PARCEL MAP
N NNY-- A division of 191 acres
Of Lart „ into 14 parses within the Minimum Impact Heavy
Industrial Area (subarea 9) €bcated on the southside of Arr A
Rte., east and west of Milliken Avenue - (APR 229- 111 -23),
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Parcel Map 8578 as shown orb Exhibit "B" was initially approved
by the Planning Commission on October 24, 1984. The first of a possible
three one -year time extensions was granted on August 27, 1985, extending
the approval period until October 24, 1987. The applicant is now
requesting the second of the possible three one -year extensions. The
letter of request (Exhibit "C ") is attached for you reference.
p
ANALYSIS: /
It is current policy of the Planning Cam", ssion to modify the original
conditions of approval to include a co edition for undergrounding of
existing overhead utility lines. This `condition is included under
Section II -C of the attached resolution. 1
The Planning Commission, however, cannot conditionally approve a time
extension for a Tentative Parcel Map. T,%e'refore, the Planning Commission
may either deny the ~- tension based or ;'inconsistencies with current City
Policy, approve the extension with only those conditions that were
required with the original approval or approve the extension with the
modification with the consent of the Developer.
Item H
ti))
PCSR
;1
OCTOBER 14, 1987
<'
PAS,E 2
RECOMENDkTION
it is recommended that the Planning
Commission adopt the attached
k
resolution with modifications- approving
Parcel Map 8578 the
a one -year time extension for
^
s:
with consent of the
Oerieloper. The new expiration
date would be October 24, 1988, .
'z
Respectfully submitted,
s.
Barrye R. Hanson
Senior Civil E:sgneer
's
BRH:BK:sd
Attachments: Vicinity Map ( "Exhibit A ")
Parcel Map ( "Exhibit B ")
Letter of request ( °Exhibit
C")
Location of utility Lees (
"Exhibit D ")
� \1
l
i
i ♦ /l /l /IIII�% 1 I �.
: d
s•041Frelrix
i�I�e�G'EL l�.df® No 85 75
/<frat Ciry Oa f4A'CA'4P CL/LaA/OVGa,L"eaNrrOr
.fS�N 4ievieafve. lri ri O. CicKrsvfa
tsir.. /rraa Sttssl•.r Lr<+! ✓eute, <.ltlt6
/s �•setce /30 :IC etr
!lfi1L /luwOV /N6' Scw.e,GrntkrevtlG,.K 1NeLyttd¢ /fV C /N!r Sutrtreee
�' �rl1r .�I /q/t!O Ar ii/t QR /d! 01
��_ Qfxwis lwetire�tl'
e +pA•.surMw r Boer
f J•rA ./y� J•.f d.11 t YMfrfl I»lf) AIA1YAi/e epw LirMW!%
Y�v.In�^pY'•lJ►M..wfSSwy r") RAM <sa,s YO LaM.fY.WO�'NJ
rl »r sevArwr t/�xi�Y•I= -�
V �. NMWr, fI1l/rr ,
a _ Y•_. �r•Y X/•fl/r
1]t� r ttfrsroe �aiwrt _ /rtfxrra•fe
�swX •ao smea .stpwv syvw•..ee• rn�p�.c
s.v rtnw> ®w:===
s nar r�,wMrertx�
nr,eI�;i�Myraer...3w ov r!i fNY! Jlt /Kt' eaYJf�r f' XetC •/VI
ArYIr4 i.44M A+rariri.f low rAr4*4a4vwA%w twkvd Ne A mwO
arr •rP OYbt4q Rrjlr
dl/' /Yfry ufY w _ 1
_,_. -_ - -y ___ At,taw ------ ,r..- _~N�dawd� ---- --- - -i -Y-
t
Mf t c r aa*Y g frAgA/ attltltr drau./iw ',d* E .rr
— w x�r w mia
�waJ Y•N•M
N sF
w..nsrr:
1
•
`y SS AIRCiC I/
.� MAC&Z fl
1
~
t
'SO
y
A4•''
1
_ A N
�o
w
1A KC" 9
lkRCil a
FL
ws K : r
rs rc
r.A.sr
?
1
j i
t
�o1r
I
y 41
J
(.0 aer k
wJ�6
.xfs'
1
85
R.S
1
~^ 1
S
PARCJFt. i
3S
1.
r�tr
r ffa.r.t•4f�
afY 1
�
arKf
sA rcr
1
1
w
1
AVW r
4.9 rc /-
fterjw s
N.f rf.r
/6tRriL
h
/
25
1
'
as
eI�If.M11✓
+
iM'tC/' f
/
i .ri ac
2Z
t
Mf t c r aa*Y g frAgA/ attltltr drau./iw ',d* E .rr
— w x�r w mia
�waJ Y•N•M
N sF
w..nsrr:
V Santa Fe Pacific Realty Coiporatian
Sm East Iturerial Highway. Snitae7iA0 1�
Brss. GalUmia 92621
7li/993SWO
August 18. 1487
V-1'.103
City of Rancho Cucamonga
C`y Engineer's Office
9320 Baseline Road, Suite C
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: Ms. Linda Beek
Re: Parcel Map 8578, Santa Fe Land Improvement Company
Dear Ms. Beek:
Parcel Map 8578 expires on October 24, 1987. Although we are proceeding�ith,
the engineering and processing of the Final Mai:, we will not be prepared to
record the map by October 24, 1987. Therefore, we respectfully request a
continuance of Parcel Map 8578 for one year to October 24, 1988.,
As agent for Santa Fe Land Improvement Company, we are requesti,hg the City of
Rancho Cucamonga to process an extension as quickly as possible. Thank you.
Sincerely,
r
P. S. Martinez
Project Director
27/5203s/6
cc: Mr. D. k Gunderwe�n
Williamson and Schmid
17782 Sky Park Boulevard
Irvine, CA 92714
C OF
ANCHO CUCAMONGA
%GMMaNC D1 R Ji7i O
4�
"1 RESOLUTION NO.
4 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING A (TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 8578. (APN 229- 111 -23)
I. Recitals. i}
(i) = Santa re ,Dew o ment Com v has filed an application for the
extension of arcs: Ffap N as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter fn ihfs eeso u*_ion, the subjLct Time Extension
request is referre' f.A as "the application-.
(ii) (ii) On October 24 1984 this. Commission adopted its Resolution
No. 84 -122, thereby approvinS, sa et, to specific conditions and time limits,
ParceiF3ap No. 8578,
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
II. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
A. This Commission hereby specifically finds that a_'�.of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Pa -t I, of khis Rest,, "pion are true
{; and correct. --
B. Based upon substantial evidence presentee to this Commission,
Including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows: ;
I.The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely -
to cause public health and safety problems; and
2.17he extension is within the time limits
prescribed by state law and local ordinance; and
3.That strict enforcement of the conditions of
approval regarding expiration would not be
consistent with the intent of the De�ielopment
Code.
C. Resolution No. 84 -122 is hereby modified to add, under the
section entitled "General Requirements and Approvals ", the
following condition:
I'
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1487.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKcNGA
BY:i.arry . McNle airman
ATTEST*
--rr-48 Buller, Deputy cretary
E
RESOLUTE
PAGE 2
16. Existing Overhead Utilities
(a) Arrow Route - The exi#injl o!- �rhead utilities (electrical
and telecommunications) on the project side of Arrow
Route shall be undergrounded from the first Pole offsite
east of the project east boundary to the first pole
Offsite west of the project wect boundary, prior to
�\ Public improvement acceptance 'or occupancy, whichever
I occurs first. The Developer may ",,quest a reimbursement
�� agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for
undergroundirg from the "future development
(redevelopment) as '.t occurs on the opposite side of the
street.
(b) Communication lines within the A.T. & -S.F. Railroad right
of way - At: as contribution to the future
undergrounding of the existing overhead Railroad
,
Communication tines shall be ppid to the City prior to
final approval of the parcel map. The fee shall oe one -
half the City "&pied unit arnotnt times the length of the
project frontage.
(c) Communication lines for 66 K.Y. electrical - An in"Ilieu
_ fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of he
existing
overhead utilities (communications for 66 K .
electrical: 'orated within a Southern California Edisn
Easement south of the south boundary line of the proj�_;t
shall be paid �� 6r to final approval of t parch
map. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted uni,,t
.amount times the length of the Project frontage.
Based upon the findings, conclusions and modifications forth.,,
set
in paragraphs A, D and C above, this Commission hereby grants a`."
Time Extent'lon for;
Plr el Ma Rp iicant Ex irati�n
��. >.
$676 Santa Pe Development Co. October 24, 19W
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1487.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKcNGA
BY:i.arry . McNle airman
ATTEST*
--rr-48 Buller, Deputy cretary
E
RESOLUTION
PAGE 3
I, :,Brad Bulry4 , Deputy S��etary of the Planning Commission of the City of
1,1 Rancho Cucani<ga, do hiieby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, Massed, and adopted {:y the Planning Commission of the
City Of Cho Cucamonja, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comnrss.;_tyn held 9
on the 14th, day of pcW�-, 1987, by the followi'r3 vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: 'COMMISSIONERSs�.�`t
r
,ABSENT: F,OMMISSIOwmB
Jt
f
A
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Octoher 14, 1987
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
6'f: Debra Meier, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13F79 - AYOUB
multi-family resiUntial development comprising
units on 0.69 acres of land in the Medium Residential
District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) located on the
east side of Hellman Avenue, 325 feet north of 19i'j Street
- APN: 201 - 474 -12.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DE§G[IPTIQ-
A. Action Requested: Approval of the subdivision map, conceptual
plot pp anT` conceptual grading plan, conceptual landscape plan,
and building elevations for the development of 9 townhouse
u, •s, and issuance of a Megative Declaration.
B. Project Density: 13.0 dwelling units per acre.
C. Surroundlu Land Use and Zoninq:
North — Existing Towr owes; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling
units per acre)
SoutK - Existing Single Family Residences; Medium Residential
(8-14 dwelling units per acre)
East - Existing Townhomes; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling -
A is per acre)
West - Existing Single Family Residences; Low Residntial
(2 -4 dwellingi units per acre)
D. General Plan Designat;a;as:
rojec e - Kess "dential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre)
North - Medium Residential (8-14 dw671 ing units per acre'
South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
East - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
West - Low Residentia! iZ44 dwelling units per acre)
E. Site Characteristics: The site slopes from north to south at
approx ma,e y a percent grade. The parcel contains an
existing single family residence and accessory structures which
will be removed. Also, two trees will be removed, a 24 inch
diameter cedar and a 24 inch diameter pit.
ITEM I
PE,MI'NG COP>�� tN' SUFF RRPOAT
lfwrAh vE TRAct 13&'7`9 - AYOUB
October 14, 1987
Paje 2
F. Parking Calculations: o
Number of NuLter of"
Type Spaces Spaces
of Use R ired provided
9 three- bedroor units
(2.0 x 9)-' 18 18 enclosed
= (0.2 * 'x 9) 2.2 3 open
Tatrl -
I1. MALYSiS:
A. General: The townhouses are desi'JI in three levels, two
s,o�i ryes of living space over a two cae garage. The units are
provided within two buildings. Private open space for each
unit cbnsisis� \of et,trance patio and two rear balconies. On-
site amenities';"are clustered to the rear portion of the site,
including pool;;�pa, sin dock, tot lot and opan p14 area.
B. De_31gn rw U ittee: The projev-�t was presented to the
U00 9n Keview 'I; 'ol~, ti rick, Bul " ,, Coleman) on August 6,
} A3Yl The Coamittee deteri.ined thal_4&rious architectural and
site plan revisi�,gs were necessary. The specific concerns
were:
1. CoWttee's Concern: The sit2-design i,,'. very tight and
does not allow sufficie,— �-- , rimete landscaped area or
adequate landscaping r;ong the ends: of the buildings.
Some alternatives way be to gain eaiergrncy access to
the north through the 4lzo "nods project or eliminate a
unit.
Applicant's Response : The a; ^plicant di.. try to gain
rgency access to the north on!o the ,Alta Woods
toknhome project. The Homeowner's Association for the
1
project denied his request. Rather than delete a unit,
the rppiicant is, concentraVdq on all the specific
pW.aeas related to the denseness of the site 3s
described in items 2 and 3. The applicant added two
iiple trees to each end of -the building adjacent to
Hellman. However, the planter death it too small for
trees and a tall growing shNb, such as Podocarpus is
suggested.
2. Comitted's Cor;.#"n: Provide an *ppropriate gandscape
screen along the east property line to achieve private
screening for the pool area from the Alta Wood pt.iject
adjacent.
40
PLANNING STAFF PcEPORT
TENTATIVE TRACT 13679 • AYOUB
October 14, 1987
Page 3
APPlic&nt's 106PO"M. The landscape area along the
north and east edge of the pool and deck area now
contains d Continuous screen pf trees on * IF foot
centers, T?te trees proposed are !4 *, Pe. Staff sqq ea sts
U0R9 3 -,Mfes more adaPtab7e to ;cur climate.
tiquidambae 'a.- SYc*More could provide '% a similar
appearance aod'are.better suited for drougM 6 lerance.
3.,- Cowftteels CN-ettrn: Thme ends of AA;h building need
addlticoali� architectural treatment. --Some suggestions
discussed meeting included:
a. Ilse of siding materials on Mese elevations.
b. Gradient change in color fires upper and lower
levels of,'3uilding.
,q. Brin.,ging the bal,conies around the corners of
the building.
d. Some fore of stucco trimmino details.
ApplicimtIn Response: The applicant has provided
vertical :-ood siding 'with a horizontal 2 x 10 trim
piece at %ach floor level.., The siding is tainted,
carrying out the blue-grey color lr*dnqe of the J sired
Cape-Cod theaK of the.-v)t%1ject.
4. Consitz6ft's ccm.� *rn.. It would -11so he desirdble to add
interest to the roof 14,ne with changes in ridge
location, or some vertical relief such as -hringinj the
roof lower at the ends vl the buildings.
P M cO
int's Respmse: The roof line - if the end unt ts
"been dropped 12 inches below tit. 'fddle portio;', I of
the building.
S. COMIdUft's Concern: The Planning Comission pol4cy
has been to upgrade all roof material to concrete
tile. For this particular project the suggestion was
slate colored flat tile.
1lPPlic4nt's R07
Roof material proposed is nf)w
concrete Wt L
C. Technic.0 Revlew Cemittee: The Comittee reviewed the project
anT_de_T erns -n`e3_ffi-aT-W7W-We rtc Aended standard conditions of
.
approl(OI--, and special conditionz;" as provided in the attached
Resolution, -the project=4s consistent with all applicable
standard~ and Ordinances.
7
PLANNIM tUMEtaOR Vn.WF REPORT
TEN-ATIVE TRACT 13579 AYOUB
October 14, 1987
Page 4
D.' EnvlronmentaA6sessment: Pirt I &I the Initial Study has been
completed by aPPT]ca S,�aff has cimpleted PFrt II of the,,,
En ' vironmental ChecPllst and,%tfo�nd no significant �ifipacts on the
e.wiroment as i result of this project.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: ne Nroject is consistent with'the Dev6lopmenit
ode and-a-e-ge-n-Wrar Plan, and- will not be eetrimental to adjacent
properties, or cause. significant imp,&c,ts. The proposod use,
building ds.1sign ioi,d s0divi sion, 'together with all recommended
conditions of approval, are in compliance with applicable
regulations of the Development Codp.,
IV. CORRESPCMEMCE: This. item"has been adverti3ed as a public hearing'
T5--ffi—eTuaTiTy-RHeport newspaper, 7Kje property posted,-and nQtices
werom, serrt--to-41,T—property qwneirsi4ithin 300 feet, of the p ect
site.
V. RECOMENOATI6k. Staff rzirommends that the Planning �,ommlFsion
-re-fflflve
approye lract 1,1579, subject to the craditio;rX of
approval, through adoption of the attached Reselutlon r nd isivance
of a Negative Declaration,
Pei rully s itted,
oil
City anner
BB:DM:te
Attachments: Exhibit ca,*f� 14ap
Exhloit m8m - Sit;h- - -t .)/Tree Removal Plan
Exhibit "C" - Tmt�jAmoval p�rmit
Exh',-It'"D" - Conceptual tandscaping Plan
Exf.ib It *E* - Pre-vivinary Gnding Plan
Exhibit "Fm - Fire 1�1,partu,,nt Circulation
Exhibit uG" - Btflldiht Elevations
B,Mbit "V - Floor Plan
'LlsOluti(M of Approvil with Conditiors
All&
40L
w
R-l-,830U
PROJECT
LOCATION
5 F F,
R- I 8*1r-wQQ--
nsneraeVlTA
R-1
INORTH
CITY Of� ITENI-t 2�AC-1 4�2577
RAi'�-,'CHO CLUVVIONGA
PLANNING DlVS3&'
� .. A.eN er' er w eee �• N° / lA.w i
iJ 9 I � TayH�.M' A. ! 1•il i4 � � ^ �
E I '
af�tlYae '
1
BULLOM PAD ( er+
iUftDIN1i RAD .� d..
}�-- — I J ` yl i ..5�2• � � awr I +ov x+r � �+Y � `.'Sttr4CStuatc i
• eN 7' N• l 1ii2e'
517E PLAN
..,e - su <•,�•. _•E.. sn.nar: �r .cas G�.�a `: - s emaaa.w•s � —°axam a�¢ov''`on
4—:7 aa� CCCOi T?CCtP¢`i0
JJ !' a t J/SSJ -Ai.S M1Pa a•�p 600
• .? '�4�Y :•.tY 1 .� •� !ICJ _Stl : ']t _ S .l+• aJJ CJi`.
•��a},} _ .e�a.?avvaJG � 9 ipf ]i•I .�YrJ¢¢atq ,.vS :b )CO
Y' SPa2,C: Y2 %Se JJ W! I TI.'�.ta• ?�'q �� .]5
rl�
Cif' Cxv
RANCID K; ; rr�.►= 6► �'�_e►r
movat
DEV
�Lpe
..,_^
iFFET
t E-[HAN STR iwS 4Et5R't t EA' R�
OR M arson
INFORMATION uires that nP P
VAI» rivati property' rdQ a sin g #e trunk
Feservatlon pi trees on p rit and having
king to the p mteen tt�l feet in rielq
tams in excess of .' having a circumterenpe -1 thirty Trt
Ordinance Plo. 276. Pertavoody P df more and multi - trunks 1eve11, wahout #first obta•fning
Cep Qve of T:;tocate anY .tb tnctk�ls inchas from ground
c tcurn #erence Of fifteen t s 10V (24)
incites or more (measure ure Glty.n �
Removal Permit
Cot' STF
f,{ ties . Ave. bbd kel':man Ave ---
(! I N QP SUBJECT SITE: x�ranb
!_CCMr O gf Chard .._ ----�
1 ,iktJtE.ADC3RBSS•iB4EPHQhiBt}[r APPf.iCAi1T: --- - °-""'`
Lar..a�. x 9= t�T tyR {if otheF that a xtil ant)
MA# hE. AG' �RESS,TSLEPHU��aEgFPRt7PERT`lOW
the oro a -ed'
# Sheets)'
Q— !1 1 EASE S VQR REM0\1AL tattactt nc cess r TATI'aE TBACx MAE
} loth ildin ads, (SL " _` -�-- -_
��-
--
from i hz. then ..�.. ---
. —__� -- Trim
otROPOSEf�t +kETHOCl;}FRB1Vl4VAt.: t3ATS,
'"' ;
APPLICAN -r S SIGNATURE:
REG
A p tt3btAt F1LthiG REID
' lan ir•dicat`nq designated. If a t -ee fig jectui ed.
tacatian of all trees to be removed and retained.
ciude a Plot P f the disease Shall be reR
Tnis application sna mature rs - -�—w—'
> number. and size rn af!lcenr ed aFb be stating
shall be re dese
i I e sperms,
written Stalemen• fro W _--
l!.- then a __a
ttoailort is Based gist She +criteria o►4 the reverse l e. -
t * v;jtuatfon Of this aP�P__ _.: �-- -»-- r DENIED � --
.. - -� treasons:
5 i �7• fir,....,.._ .
Hate: _ 8n to P
iscation snail r e ecelved, it = /
'midicat'ion of a P ealS are
prior to aPtrraval. apP
Q. date of action, This approved free iemcvat Parr
(jF building permit issuance, tvhiChever comes' �r��..x.SCA """ �----
eriad. a ney4 perm t shad be re4ulr un j,
day P n of tt+,> r iri*.
- ��1Q�
� r
■ "d ar&PI
r.
NutT`t-t
GRADING PLA?,,t
MY CF. n-Em. L�Age
RANCHO CLUAMMUL nnEl�
PLA-NNM
EXHINT Scxu.-
,171�1
FIRE TRUCK ACCESS PLAN
rVa
LEGEND _ _
1,
"+K?m
RANCHO rL . ON i'l u:
GARAGE ENTRY ELEVATION
AMONT ENTRY ELEVATION
SAUTE. ELEVATIONS I nc-rt I ol*vatlong shmllxr I
lwa-14 Nd*l;77
TYPICAL ELEVATION,
PROPERTY LXME
BLOCK WALL
CATY OF rrEm.
RANUiO CTUAMONCA TM E:
MANINLNG DpagoN
EXHMrr: _g Z SCAU-_
wr
BUILDING SECTION A
AMONT ENTRY ELEVATION
SAUTE. ELEVATIONS I nc-rt I ol*vatlong shmllxr I
lwa-14 Nd*l;77
TYPICAL ELEVATION,
PROPERTY LXME
BLOCK WALL
CATY OF rrEm.
RANUiO CTUAMONCA TM E:
MANINLNG DpagoN
EXHMrr: _g Z SCAU-_
_ .�a .n e.a w�
tlwwGet .�.«�...� unit alley -
.� .� - K unit
..��.�- setback "+ -- setb %Lk
SITE / FENCE SECTION - 2
as aiwia ru. -
units ....z _
drive r. turnaround
SITE / FENCE SECTION - 1
. `M1.1i\ 1 1-1
k
C .t. i
RA' ME, rr
PLANNIM DFUC7i` iXE[QtT =__SCALi�
1
lie-
�.__._
�.,�.... ...a. ��......c
yF„
4
-
1
� i
lvwiliRA 9e0c oorA tirlaR�TO 10�K
;1
�
a.i _e.....i_
V'694YV. N50.YR �n911r1
ur9s+osa t�0[NI! RµhC 1WK
_
FRST FLOOR LEVEL
11
gins u..c wA ma <rt w�.A- x.r�c +TK
-wK ri.n a9al xoo �rs.a
'� c+9we ci�e
sro+o*K yip'
. `M1.1i\ 1 1-1
k
C .t. i
RA' ME, rr
PLANNIM DFUC7i` iXE[QtT =__SCALi�
1
RESOLUTION 93.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING commissiom OF THE 4ITI' OF
RANCO CUCMOKA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT AAP NO. 13579,
AND DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF, A MULTI - FAMILY DEVELOPMENT
COMPRISED OF 9 UNITS ON 0.69 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE
EAST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, 325 FEET NORTH OF 39TH
STREET, IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLXNG
UNITS PER ACRE) • APN 2i)1- 474 -12
A. Recitals,
(i) Richard Ayoub has filed an application for the approval of
tentative Tract Map No. 13579 as dtl�cribed in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter is this ;resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Wp and Design
Review request is re!'erred to as "the Application *.
(ii) On the 14th of October,. 1987, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly ioticed public heli,ing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal p~erequisites to the adoption: )f this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. Thl, Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct,
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Comission
during the above- referenced puV is hearing on October 14, 1987, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically Minds as follows.-
(a) The application applies to property located at 6694
Hellman Avenue with a street frontage of 133.28 feet and lot depth of 193.40
feet and is prenently improved with curb and gutter and an existing single
family reside"-- -. will be removed; and
(b) The propert to the north of the subject site is
townhw.s, the property to the south of that site consists of single family
;residences, the property to the east is townhomes, and the property to the
crest is single family residences.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presenteA to this Covoissian
during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specifi` findings of
:acts set forth in paragraph I -and 2 above, this Commission hereby fiad5 and
concludes as follows:
.1 "114
7�: 7
PLANNING- COW
T'S'STOR RESOLUTION NO.
TENTATIVE TRACT 13579 - AYOUB
OctGe be2 r 14, 1987
Pag
(a) That tentative tract is wonsistent With, the
General_.Plan, Development Code, and specific
Plans; �,:xId
(b) Tice rkdsign or improvements of the tentative
4 is consistent with the GenerGI Plan,
D(lielopment Code, and specific plant; and
(c) The site ii-` PhYSictily suitable for the_typ� of
development proposed;,and
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage and
_,avoidable injury to humans and wildlift or
their habi,413t; ai.d'
(e) The tentative tttct is not likely to cauii�i,
serious publi,c health problems; and V,
(f) The design of the tentative tract Will not
conflict with any easement accpiir
by the/!'
public at large, now.,of record, _ tr acres *`
through r or use of 6,te prtperty within t4l'
proposed subdivision.
4. This Commissida,hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environtriental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby Issues a Negative
Declaration.
n\J 5. Based, upon the findings arw� -conclusions" set forth in paragraph
1, 2 a' r 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to
each ar�d every c0dition. set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions attachedharoft and incorporated herein by this reference.
(a) Planning
I. All trash enclosures shall be 'pro!`�ded with
overhead lattice work or simil-V- shaded
structure to the satisfaction of the City
Planner.
-
ii. Perimeter walls and feiL,�s shall be 'decorative
and shall match existing walls. final design
details of the perimeter walls shall 4'g
included as part, of the landscaWirrigatidI
plans, subject t� the review and 4proval
the City Planner.
PLAllKW9 Cy*�1 MM,' �3" a t 01
,. TE#7ArIVL 11:ACAl
B
r „. October-14, 2987
Page
Lo',v 1eve! lighting shall be provided in all
ope:k. SIMce areas. Dasiin details shall be
included an tha detail lighting plan subject to
review° and approval of both_; the Planning
Divisiwand the
Sheriff's Department prior to
tht issuance of building permits.
IV.
All outdoor *4% box li�cations shall be
provided with a sqlid overhead structtare and
appror late lighting. 'she- -final design shall
be c atible with the building archi -.tore
-
and thill' be incladed in the construction
drawings, subject to the review and approval of
the Planning Vvision.
v.
A fence enclosed tot lot with fttive play
equipment shall be provided. location and
design details shall be included i% _ the
t
landscape /irrigation plans, subject to the
review and approval of the Planning Division,
vi.
A tare appropriate tree species shall be used,
insto?td of Maple, that is suited to this
climate.
vii.
Fail growing shrubs,! r �h as PoOocarpus;`-shall
W planted at the E ,. of building dore;t
Mailman.
r
vi
Slate coloesd twat concrete ile shall be used
as the roof material.
ix.
Electric .meters shall be a tclosed or screened
with an architectural detail to the
satisfaction of the City Planner.
,;.
Patio wails shall be decorative to the
,atisfaction of the Citi Planner,
7�.e Flinch diameter cedar and pine trees shOl
be replacd in ;;ind with the largest nursery
grown ;reel available in 1+ .5�:ations to be
determined in the final landscape plans t'hre V-,
sati'- faction of the City Planner.
r
(b) Encirt�er�z Diyisiuh
i,
The drivo approach shall be constructed in
accordance wjth City of Rancho Cucamonga
Standard Drawing No. 306.
j
0701 -02 0 10 -14 -87 P Agenda
. a
PLJW911M40, i 1b rt S 31T.�+ NO. ;
TENTAMIE TRACT 18573 A qqB
October 14 � 87'
Page 4
ii. An in -lieu fee as dontributn to the future
undergrounding of Vie existing ove0tead
utilities (telecommunications and electrical)
on the proje6 side of Hellman Avenue shall be
.paid to the City prier,tb the appro4al of the
final asap. The fee shall be one -half the
adopted) unit amount times the length of the
project frontage.
6. The Deputy SP.1-tetary to this Comissinn shall certify to the
adoption of this Resoiutfon.
APPROVW AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1987.
PLANNING, COMMISVION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI A
arry . e , ME man
ATTEST:
Brad a er, epu
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of t,%- Plat 'ring Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify than I.-ILA *opt:going Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and aooptL, jy the planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamon,,,, at a regular 4rtieti;eg of the Planning Commission held
on the 14th day of October, 1987, by the T01 owfi3g tote -to -wit:
AYES: I COMMISSIOUERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
�7
6 �1•
r
l
t
�w�N♦..YYVUiai
ss
at 4
QC
Y9 ^.sNM r`�G
M CCO��VC
.p♦.-. . e.a'..!' ..
1`
O
pV
S
6
b
.
j"15 5di IB.:.!-
yL.'f;� � w� .TLI iC
-a E
}iwi Clµyw6 T� �CY C+p?
tNHi.7gZi Q! EEG E' + b 11C
v.
M H ■
^cY
i
�TM
AWY
�ggY�
a�G
�M
V O. V H Y
L
�i i qa
°
u6
zg
IL
6
w
a �tP
°
���.Y» ..•�'aa wE��s OQp C
w�N��� � Y 4 r,�� C ^"LO •
p C i
A dgolYy 6� C��v\, N�F•Nn �.
r O� p wY •�. p!�
w
• yYY MME ��� V
! NY. �O1 C•+ Nom• N W
Y
�S `` ♦ \ \N \M \j`I � �j�
yW p tCC� �pI
1� �C ♦ 9 � ��YL Y\.G}Ld
r � r N w ab,�V,up`.•��
Cw�pva °w
W S a C yy 6a Cad C
C Y
Y w 6 w w 0 w pO� Yf
y,• 3. � l i �� N � 0L C O
g T p C 4 M Y q
O M w Yi 4 O w
-2-5
� •► > A' r't Y Pa, S
S9
_d �cc �V �� V OO.'O.p q_ ■Y
.y � •i �1 QOY' � V �� ��y Y•�Q pli•��ti
O � �6y ~ O \• ��' YYM O�O�N��
CY�aNaq yYY
wVY3 Cp�GGLLYC
�• ♦V.•H a � NI 1•'f
�1
17
�YL p r L yi>
tii �OL�� +K �M C G} LOy�°.•wgn
ii �N Q��N yY� § {I_y♦ �¢y L
�[g 8 yCN
Yc . „•-N Y.��Yri
• °3W EXi
Aa .2 N�RL °s N^ S W 95-
L N �
LC�°I^ MLq�yyY Y�V M�`a�l°, yV
__yy sy' L•U 'L��yy pp•.ic ^ ^r�4�(Mp/�s{S /Y9
�■ •i d � 0.0 � C Y! � N N L� i p N V
� V T
Yv iu Wur
C
e
�3�a aq b Y
V Y yyY K0.
g °g� «w a35
N?^ V^ F.
MN�Y� aF
8^: �cp.
CCYM MV^
T
U0�C jY y�C �OL
+c=4 N�p�CC
�O YO D
J/� N
CC 6 o N M
O N ^ oil
O p J
gs> U'
Y..
N0
+�+s8��8Zpp pO • '° ;..!fig �g
lL CA
yLVNB YN+ ° YN >I►
E; 9 r e Y Y p G
$ ^�: n .. 4 cZ.w. e
� c -9� � iswri� a ---44 t-A
lIi� zm w3
}yN1y L
s� +*�
Izz
r Y'; EQoarl �a
y?y1�a pig -jj 'C! lit 1j j .R 1i�
^u{ ^M.yO gf yCV a9.� Y
M LoM Y SQf
0.5 Sri �'s °. N.
M1 is-
ci
1
N
t
V e r' V'Z� L!
N,4L C Y 6`N'M MN nV Vy =�w
Vib Soo.,
4r M Y yNi�s� flit r. O ET-2 jjQ4
If
Maa is i'y i=1YF ris is ��g 4rg ygaCgp 4f[
IS + O e` 4 N G, - h - u
y�yyN• V NCYY
ij� aLZ Gtl �. 33Yyyy..=. pc � ^� L y��i ¢° �`p C44.■ Q
+O O V HH T^ wC ^L4.0 �� M 4 OVNL ^G B�� LW
O00 I +3�a1� ,. t�1Y Nit.
V, 1z `N cC
yZz YUM AY`
4 ��
M W.JG^ w CN yai+y r0. CC ya9q'GL 3W o
VNyyyVo
aM yLg- di A� VNaq� >g�i �YC >R� V LSL L L
wo
Um
((�E
v
11
tMM```1
2c
V
yyW
d
SCD C OC CU O. pOCC?'�{1(CC]Yi Y.r .C.�ii�
z y !O ! D^
Da aNi A� ^
O. ►L N .._ aW ^� _p 60 V C ^ aLp _yC G V 9C • C V l
.jr„y�O YN Q Oi Na Lti`Cr�°C 6Y�4pM9 iL'4 �, .eyes . �,�tat
L «wc o� Y d0 wA�M Y�OZZ YYY Glq ~y 00 �yy �T�y4�� �tt p M��
^ScNAi w.G V
HZ. -yy Y)■C6.O t 4Q pqCL« pw 7,. L`V MY=i�.r 2NNqgr� MQ�n7�yy V
—ION Y pONO r {N�,twYy C t � '�.��TD . �� ^NLCN = y °L • N rUCYV� _^MCr � A
$'r+) ►6'OG~O Laa^+ �a «O' C'3 VNN
uas y.�t c
^�.y L� ^sp M c x Y ' Z� ►„"�N 7. 2� •YC. C $$ k: c,g 52-
O t O yy c •+ 9CC Y�yj MV w «a
OHO �3tl YC w`R Y~ 6 0.w�iH 40. C~ pytl�` $Y
AVY ~n~ M Ni p:y 9L ��c.�6 Gwi 0,� Yty N .gyp+$. wdf V'tJ
•L ►O �M Y C�yyC� 3s+K C�O��MA`{+^��NO Yq �C� ^o QY� +yVG. pCpM yC6
G tl^ tl N L
'H Y p N d j� ` O. ► V V r. C Y
°t Y.,. °aayu �SO�.' -Ye '' «• o °fi ui _�4�..
■ M L Q q « N► L M T �. i ry C L L 4� Y^ O 0 ��f y V r.. V � °Cp O y4c tl 6
gp0_CC CC a0� N�dliV
2.1 «�. '� ►c 'fin •« � Cw p L «inYVA
y N a N tl
ul� C �C'tl Jul V� 0 9 N �► p A M )y 01L aV� G 01 N
Ary�r Oyu N LO yY�Y `w
C q�Yy tCC GyY CC ^Mr �NA Ctl
• C � �� N O � �� 6 Y 6 C y� d G� � Y L�`
Y .O CQ; Sao L d V YY ►P "yCYY pi Yq Y=3 O Y
YW N a U j a q pp► COY C L V O Y L'' `�. '
'9 4 A -2-
R ZL
S
QI L L Lyp C C C
p 9YY
° QY . P «�~R. i_"r� ` e iin Lp �Y '^{S{y�� 9 ryryAYL � N O C C 1uN Y fC t yM oL. COrT � N° ^� Y q +`�O TY� •Vc
pVW C NgL yg l; — 5 V
e i=,. ;.5-3
t O ..GC ' rr^4y9V L
u
1. fl!
=23 _ 3 y Y� ■wM1 Yy
dO Ksa� ¢v� /Y --o.w. tN <a Tew aG.>E1 ic;� ^tG SYiY.°w. °L
c ` � KGY C �.N� WL OYNMYtl.
M
``�� Ypw�rr�� Vwax^tl.J4 CyC C ^e c��I G1� 0 =34 YOT
■g«� �C YrUUU� � ^3�9 aY►$�C`S�lC NVtb _ ►N
I: LSt
M L S C L Y 6i
a4. "• L Y C �I N.�C � r� yu y� �Lf O a! ¢ Ii..V ,`t i[ y= ` � i eni�
Y 1 O Y�� Md� LS O dill � NY�gY �i�r WY
lb-
�WCfI
O w y
C = VGOL YYY VL N
Lp9l pi,w C. CM��N m QY VSz
ilo �Vb 1SJgk LLO qv —ae sir^
8 • q ��ll � Y ,{Yy� y(�
4L JJ r
Ll L ¢41` WV 21. Y G'�aD ^Y]iiW q.ON S. Y
fig
4 4p Y
►'L ^.O� 6sYea V V ► �� �''''lp��2w`fl000 K.S.
4 OI' C My M wig wA` Yl._J yO,'Y�i w Y'4'
„TLK LM NpyC N N��l G 5i`'t+�r 4 ► =1G� N T.
r - ViA CLi �'JM L V
6 i Y L L M '�. N Y i'^ ►,j(y ~ .V. M ... i ��1 �N3j S Y M} 9 Y 8Y t�1 N
6ppGCq d�l1i� iCl �{ II'YT S N d L4 NVI.�•np. LA 4 6 CG
4iY� NO. Y�C L R` Ny6 VVVVlIII N,� ��Vq O LNd � y
15 Evil Ill
> yY
.f' W
L
p' �, { "� _ �t 411 p; y G C p 2' Rl YN. 6p G► C� c Y V Ci V
C i pLp ,.{p�Oitl Q '� ±�' ENl �O vY Cq yX� �{Y�'i YyY •^ q L O yL � C Q N �
.. �6lpy� � 3 i� � ^� K GxL� N� y.GT q Y$ Yom►
N `S.� S �! }A. �►R SpY� � ipN > O ''pypy yy4��0 LM3 GLi
► V~ V ► K C L tl Y C A d L C C } Y L V q
rzi $t'n y°y
a� C L9 y1C COr
13Y e Z a4C ^+ S .Aa
5 �q C p
j L Y S ~ ..
M
p CC
■CGY^ �y3 ,� Y� � ^d pyvy ` b� > N�sp N�{�'p> SV >Ow j � y
6dY N �. ^YC N«�Vl �LpIC �bLG
LLY''0'L[QCcQ DI r MAY S{l1ON CY V)N OV �Oq� yYG .YCMV ►�r'4
YCi 0.w M LL C wN�y q�f '= O n& NN� 9� ^H AEC
vV L C> V Vyy s 4tl �. Y4; N 4N ppLd M� SY " two ON�L
Ois MpYI pi V >YqQ NY C&A'. ViVC aC O6Q«C it I 3 nCll y}1+L tl �.`{ ^ p�■{ g ai 8 p{VG P C- U�iOw � 1p O i ''1QOLI+`M
V y .Ci py` p 3
Z~ >jo
ep CY
a a .
` 6. � CI C NR N� V
L
G
W _� I is
E
11
11 pq
r�Ya s � «rJ
E OOH 4ii G >w a 1 T ^ YItl+ iT
IS
xg N
�i) �rL LVCYLIM VayMy V
SIX4 aLY u4 eq�
�g`m
4aw�M yN «O�� 9 W WA A P
«
2N g C C
firs gg$y
h �C yV I Y' yyO pp
A. Cpy y4` i. DU
V �PO CaW OM ^ . !N
YC «qi� 9.Y
DN tYf ui A
w ai
tCf
POC C yZV E «y lE 0140 «
�«« is a`4 .',-S w.ly. pp�Lrc -«
C{
e.« '+�' y+E .!
g��o�'
{L�ya Y +V~y Yp 4IVy /ERR { =t�Y~ YGNIT
q aC 5u+y yL s� 6f-ye� YIp
;� y iyN G YV M` ii 4. .yp`
„� � °uC _ a hN w� 6 FM09 per
Mp'ASYY
4EMy
Lia 4.. u .�3�C �'.Q �'Ve�� ae •` OY � Np ��p." V4�wag
«ty Nz $ 4NrSM0 j, I y0 TRES i3.- EY�Y�i
3v s iii m *• o � �' « `4' q. a cit° m
yP, rQ1 V Y. a. C« N0AM _L
��yyysry�.'.a'q
+vs�rS., `N «6a �N' S a +GO`K
�ii_C Ya s�O �.�� MM C� � � �a�70� �� b8 mus C,
« �^ i'(! YC V! ♦ O CM,Cq�G •M• �y {�, sus M w. Q�My,� VOy� C {a, Wyt,'pyf�
a.,.~t ='S
F C iN aOM ~N Ly �gN.}� 31 O
:8'a .yOi�A
'a w tuns M
zS AN ���. gw
a
A li
cap
Y M
L L
w
a W
q
Y
p Y
M
V
y
V r
V
9
U
n
cr
�M
� re
Will
•�
�(\
N 4 4`
r C
W
Q Y�
i
o
�
t
{C¢� O i O p
NV�
�
C
�
O
�
sp Y.
L L
Ni$a�. ^
V
p�L
&
.augy4e .M .
-!5
q VyN
�t
r G
p o dYei
O
��
S4 tC
d�„o
Y
^c�
2S
{CN �
YA
X M
V
C
p
rig
gig
Y
+
iii
u �C
60
N.p
M�.V 6pM
N
3
iY'p.,
7+
r�43pQ'
AL
p�
L
Y=
�
Q
�oD^
m
N
r
N
J
Zn-
,+n�
ass
w.+�a
.�'+�
�Q��
��y�Y.
�
�(�•�+
X33
r
~�y�
ag'
�
iP
bn
ii
�
� L
.14
2
I
�/
a
L
�•..
2
�
r�
y y
\
'
COL
Yq \O
C I
�
�t
i A L N
64
Obi
CY
qY6 }.�
�^z•
ca
AC
_ �_Y
.CN.
aw pC
a�uuu
CZZ
RI4Y.
MG
L
»
y��VVL
VIOL �'
LML�p�
NC
Y+
2^
xL
YyV+r
�
N,VC ^+icy
y�N
Oi1
yO
Y6
Sze
p
OgV1YC
C �
av
Oit
' p 4,
a
6 M
1tf
Y M
L L
w
a W
q
Y
p Y
M
V
y
V r
V
9
U
n
cr
�M
� re
�+
r G
��
V
d�„o
■C
^c�
2S
YA
X M
V
C
�■
rig
gig
Y
+
N M
I�
W a
p
3
w
N
�
m
N
r
N
J
9Q Ytl VMpY �M
�i NN
iir rp n 6�.5 ° n
all j
NMq� sgaW� L.O
qW {Gf LG �L r q OS
Y.I>
L 6� p� C ■ M �p O Y y W
+� OTLh {. 101Y (u+yp ',s
0.NV NOW qw. RRW
„"T
y>y >
e
NCB
Ll
]F N Y
n
�M
n
0.NV NOW qw. RRW
„"T
y>y >
e
NCB
Ll
]F N Y
cit
lw
'00-0
T—. a 1-
rs
qu,
2f
T 2
--.Io
wm
0
Ss
-c
la
-
.
i56
SEX
-E
ru
:ftke
ta
i
i
M4
-
V1.1
I
I
_.So
Es
xg
Ic OL
10
lrz
a
M11T
0
0
CITY OF RANCHO C "JCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 14, 1907
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FRAM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner
•
19»
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
o. -ter. - u4 F 1 ur K—gy 6u6mwiftA - An amenainent to the
eve oilmen Co Me o a y o ancho Cucamonga Ordinance
211, to revise Section 17.12.040 pertaining to upgrade of
parking allocation standards and to require enclosed
garages for all apartment and condominium projects; and,
to revise Section 17.O8.C90 pertaining to upgrade of
General Design Guidelines for parking areas in multiple
family development; and, to revise Section 17.08.040
pertaining to upgrade of minimum res .entiA unit size.
I. BACKSRUUND: The Planning Commission has previously directed staff
fo examine parking standards for multi- family projects, with the
intention of modifying ex9sting parking standards to improve both
the usefulness of required parking and the ,duality of multi - family
projects in the City. Staff was also directed to examine minimum
residential unit size. In December 1986, the Planning Commission
held a workshop to discuss multi- family parking and minimum unit
sizes for residential development. At this workshop, the
Commission requestet,'staff to pursue amending the Development Code
to reflect the Liredtion of the Commission,
II. ANALYSIS:
A. Parking Ratios: Staff had conducted a study and found that
par Ting protiT_eems in multi- family det7clopments were primarily
caused by the inconvenience of parking area locations,
unwillingness of residents to park in appropriate locations,
and general undesirability of the parking areas., rathev than
any lack of guest parking. As a result, the Planning
Commission directed staff to draft new provisions which
reflected these findings. The proposed provisions therefore
improve the site and architectural design standards to make the
parking areas more convenient and desirable to use. The
parking space ratios were modified to provide the following:
771 1
'I
i
PLANNING COWISSIoN STAFF REPORT
RE: DCA 87 -02
Ictober 14, 1987
'Page 2
1. Increased covert i space requirownts for 3 ani a
bedroom units.
2. Require at least 1/2 of the covered spaces be
garages (rather than carports).
3. .3 space increase for 4 bedroom units.
Further, the Commission requested that the new provisions
eliminate the ;parking design differences between condominiums
and apartments, which is reflected in the nct provisions.
These parking ratio changes would be reflected in the following
modified-Sections 17. 12.040 A.2 and A.3. Proposed text is
shown in`'So1'd Print, numbers in parentheses indicate existing
ratios.
2. Cluster development (condominium, townhouse, apartments,
etc.) semi- detached single family (zero lot line, patio
homes, duplexes, etc.) and mobile home parks:
(a) Studio: 1.3 off- street parking spaces per un t of
which one space shall be in a garage or carport,
(b) One (1) bedrooa:�'1.5 off- street parking spac(,, ~s per '
ivift of which one space shalt be 11
carport, n a garage or
(c) TWO, i2) bedroom: 1.8 off - street parking spaces per
unit of which one space shall be in a garage or
,�arport.
(d) Three (3) bedrooms: 2.0 off - street parking spaces
per unit of which two spaces shall be in a garage
or carport,
(e) Four (4) or more bedrooms: 2.3 off- street`garking
spaces per unit of %&ich two spaces shali be in a
garage or carport.
(f) In additic-a to the required number of parking
spaces for eanh unit, one off- street uncovered
parking space shall be provided for each four units
for visitor parking. For single family zero lot
line, patio homes, and duplexes, on- street parking
may 'be substituted for visitor parking, where
sufficient street pavement width and distance
between driveways has been provided.
PLANNING COMISMSM ST'WF REPORT
RE: DCA 87 OZ
s. October 14, 1487
Page 3
(g) A minimum of fifty pt
°rr Wred covered splices
garage structures.
(K) For developments contain
to "thirty -five percent
uncovered spaces may be
(i) The use of carports (re
Design Review Committd)e.
1
�i
( OZY of the total
be within &.xlosed
fire or more units, up
35%) of the required
Tact car size.
res approval from the
Section 17.12.040 A.3 - Apartments shall be deleted in total.
'1i
B. General Design guidelines for Multi- family Parking. The staff
sTuqy determined -th- 'dam y complexes are generally
:signed in two different concepts: 1) a perimeter loop
driveway and parking areas and 2) dispersed driveways and
parking areas. Design review policies should promote the
positive features, of both types of site planning. Creative
combinations of these two tykes of plans should result in
projects which exhibit significant opin spaces and provide
convenient parking locations. The following design criteria
has been developed for site design and architecture of garages
and carports to be added in Section 17.08.040 C.4 pursuant to
Commission direction:
(a) Site Design: Openness, re&lced structure mass, and
convenience of use should be prime characteristics of
parking area design u implemannted by the folloing:
o Parking areas (open and covered) shall be design:,'-to
provide parking spaces comveaft -Itly located to the
units they are intended to serve.
o Long. unbroken lines of opposing garages /carports on
each side of a drive aisle should be avoided. This
tyrk of design results in a 'constricted alley,
ai"sphere.
o Free standing garages /carports should be located not
to disrupt the primary view of residential
structures.
o Views to landscaped areas should be maintained at the
ends of drive aisles. Vistaz; sboold not be obscured
by facing garages or carports.
3--3
n.
PLANNING UIOWISS16K SfiofF((i�EPpRT
RE: OCA 87 -02 \
October 14, 1987
Page 4
o Planter breaks should be included along the parking
aisles. This feature adds a landscaping element into
the parking hive aisle and can fore an interesting
pattern to the driveway/parking area rhythm.
o In order 'to open up more` of the parking area to
adjacent landscaped areas and reduce the "alley"
effect along the drive aisle, offset facing
garageslcarparts are encouraged on lengthy drive
aiisles.
(b) Architecture: Garage and carport structures should
exhibit designs which are compatible, supportive_ and
fully integrated into the overall architect" theme as•;
implemented through the following provisions:
a long structures present difficulties in keeping
proportions appropriate with" the original design
intent on the main structures and therefore the
garage /car,.,?ert structures should,-be limited to 8-12
cars.
a Recognize garage doors as an element of design rhythm
and use to create Varying patterns. Extensive use oe
single width garage doors should be, avoided. The
perception of increased density ca::;_.result from a
parking area with large numbers of garage doors. An
overly repetitious pattern of doors can be monotonous
and should be avoided.
o "Flimsy", 'stick - like' carport designs which portray
and add -on, afterthought, non-permanent perception
are not desirable characteristics of a parking
araa. Substantial design elements should be
Integrated into the structure to convey a more
perwaneft concept for the carports.
a Siang -046 storage units which again appear to be
afterthoughts to the carport design should be
avoided.
C. Minimum Single- Family Unit Size. The City currently has a 300
sq. ft minimum unit size for single family units. Smaller
units are permitted with a Conditional Use hermit to allow
flexibility. After extensive deliberation, the Commission
requested staff to draft an amendvent for its consideration
which would increase the minimum unit size. This request is
reflected in the following recommended code revisions
r'
PLANNING COW. VS iMW REPORT
RE: DCA 87 -02
October 14, 1987
.,Page 5
r
Section 17.08.040 8 — Minimum Dwelling Units Size should
be ara!nded as follows:
VL L LM
Single -family detached .f' 1,000 sq.ft.* 1,000 sq.ft.* .1,000 sq.ft,*
dwellings only
*A single- 'family detached dwelling less than 1,000 sq.ft, will
require the approval of a Conditional Use Pcrmit per 1-t,.cion
17.04.030.
Section 17.08.040 C — Minimum Dwelling Units Size should
be amended as follows;
L M M'
Single family detached 1,000 sq.ft.* 1,000 &q.ft.* 1,000 sq.ft.*
dwellings only
*A single family detached dwelling less than 1,000 sq.ft. will
require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit per Section
17.04.030.
III. ENVIRONN4N7AL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Part 11 of the
Environmental Chec s and concluded that the proposed amendment
would not create significant adverse environmental impacts.
Therefore, staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
Iv. CORRESPONDENCE: This items has been advertised as a public hearing
In The ualiy=eport newspaper.
V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
a ow a affa-Zhe� Resolution recommending approval of the proposed
amendment and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City
Council,
Res tfuily s itted,
Br e
City P anner
BB:CK:ko
Attachments: Exhibit "A"
Staff Report of December 4, 1986
Minutes of December 4, 1986
Staff Report of October 8, 1986
Minutes of October 8, 1985
Draft Resolution of Approval
J,f5
J
EI aKT W
This exhibit is a cOmWiVOft of the currant and .pr*pased standard;
to hypothetical
as rrpliei
a multiple
fam�!ly prodect.
,
Parking, Spaces
<'tovered Spaces
II
k
Emits ( #)
patio Number
Ratio
Nugber
Studio (10)
1.3 13
1
10
1 BR (25)
1.5 rell 5
1
25
2 BR (25)
1.8 45
1
25
3 Bit (10)
210 20 ,_
1
10
4 BR ( 5)
2.0 10
1
5
'
visitor (75)
.25 18.75
0
0
r
i
TOTALS —
144.25
NEW STANDARDS
Parking Spaces
Covered Spaces
Units (#)
Ratio Number
Ratio
Number( -garages)
Studio (10)
1.3 13
1
10 ( 5)
1 BR (25)
1.5 37.5
1
25 (12.5)
2 BR (25)
1.8 45
1
25 (12.5)
3 BR (10)
2.0 20
2
20 (10)
4 BR ( 5)
2.3 11.5
2
10 ( 5)
visitor (75)
.25 18.75
0
0
TOTALS -
1".75
90 (45)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C� CAM
STAFF REPORT �'
}
o
DATE: December 4, 1986
19777
T0: Chai n and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Butler, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner
Otto Kroutil, Senior planner
SUBJECT: MINIMUM UNIT SIZE /MINIMUM LOT SIZE STUDY -- WORKSHOP
I. ABSTRACT: During the past year, the City has seen an increase in
development of single family detached subdivisions in the Low -
Medium Residen Ve al (4 -8 du /ac) district, particularly ir, the 6 -8
du /ac optional density range. In viewing these proposals, the
Planning Comnession has consistently raised concerns regarding
neighborhood appearance, usable yard area, and design quality. The
City Council has directed the Planning Commission to re- exaWne the
Low - Medium optional standards, lith emphasis on strengthei►ing the
4evelopment standards to address these critical issues. Thies
I•epert presents the causes, problems and alternatives for the
Plan►.ing commission's review and consideration. It also attempts
to piece the issues in proper perspective by providing background
information on the amount of LM- del% sated land available for
future development. Finally, the issue of housing affordability is
also noted. This workshop is intended to be a "kickoff" discussion
to begin the process that will uitimately lead to Developrint Code
changes.
II. PROBLE''- OEFINIw:ON: To define the problem it is o— _;sary to
un ere an ew a Low- Medium Residential District was devaoped. _
A total of 1,731 acres of land in the City are designated for Low
Medium (LM) Residential Use. Of these, 529 acres are developed cr
under development and 1,202 acres are undeveloped. Of the to, al
1,202 undeveloped acres designated for Low Medium Residential Use,
310 acres have approved tentative tract maps. This leaves 892
acres designated LM in the City (Exhibit 'A").
The Low - Medium Residential District was establisMd to bridge the
gap between apartments and conventional subdivisions and to
encourage affordable housing. The Low - Medium resic",ential standards
and polices were intended to foster high design qu::iity while being
flex0le enough to alloy: innovation. These standards are used in
conjunction with the Abso u e o cies and Design Guidelines (see
attached) which set forth the City's goals for residential
development. The Low - Medium ,'andards were specifically intended
to foster creative design solitions to those critical concerns
expressed in the policies and guidelines, such neighborhood
�� compatibility, detisity transition and design quality.
Pt—ANNING COWISSI NI WORKSHOP
ki r ;tea �1nit Size/Minimum Lot Size Study
Dec emAr 4, 19851\
Page 2
Specifically, the problem has been- ;;dentified as the center plotted
houses on 3,000 eq. ft. w 0,00`0' sq. ft. subdivisions. These
tracts are characterized by streetscape msonotony�,reduced setbacks,
reduced street sizes,; and inadequate°, yard area. These
characteristics are a function of density increases above ;hat of a ;
"conventional subdivision" with 7200 square? foot lots. A typical
small lot subdivision has lot size-,, ranging from ROO down to 3000
squkre feet as density increases from 4 to 8 dwelling ,snits per
k.;re: Street and lot patt*rns become more grid oriented to
maximize the nuoUr of lots along any given length cf street
frontage. Density increases may also result in reduced sLoa!wt
rights-of-way and pavement width which typically become privately
owned and maintained by a Home Owaer`s Association. The setbacks
are also reduced to accommodate a reasonably sized house which
exacerbates the effect of the already narrow streets. The narrow
lot widths and front loaded garages locat:d close to the street
create a "tunnel effect" dominated by asphalt /concrete, garage: and
cars.
1111. OPTIONS. In previous presentations, Staff has demonstrated the!
re-elatf hip betr,4n lot size /unlit size and density;. Further, a
lack of innovative site planning design in small tot subdivisions
has yielded unacceptable results. The following options are
presented based upon, City Council and : Plarning Cord, sign
discussions.
A. Lot Size Options: Lot width depth /area can significantly
aW"ctie s rem scape appearance. For example, wider lets
allow greater exposure of living areas to the size eet which de-
emphasizes
ot Building separation is another major, factor e infthe "feel°
of a subdivision. smaller sideyard ;.., etbacks create a greaser
feriing :)f closeness and are Often wasted space.
CENTER PLOT
(LOW .WOUM OPTIONAL STANDARD!0
a ri 1,500 sq. ft. Minimum Lot. Ares
5,000 sq. ft. Average -Lot 'Area
5110 ft. Side Yard Minimum Setback
25 ft. Front Yard Average Setback
20 ft. Front Yard Minimum Setback
15 ft. Rear Yard
40 ft. Lot Minima Width
OPTUX 2 5,000 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Area
5,500 sq. ft. Average Lot Area
5/10 ft. Side Yard Minimum Setback
25 ft. Front Yard Average Setback
20 ft. Front lard Minimum SetbaCk
Is ft. Rear Yard
50 t. Lot Minims Width
11
L]
I=
3�
t
PLANNING L'"i ISSIO IJC!Vs"kCfW
MiniNIQ Unit Size /Mnfmn'% Lot Size Study �
Decor 4, 3986. �l
Pape 3
Staff �vc6kmends Option 2 because it the gap where
center plot product can be built on smsli "bts by establishing
a 21000 square foot minimum lot area.
Regardless of which option is selected, Staff recommends that
I
he Basic Devit10 at St =,lards be modified to increase the
si deya seiix ,: - nd 20 fmat from 5 feer., and
increase the Wnimmxr lot width to raU`'fcaot average frame 45 foot
average.
INNOVATIVE PRODUCT'
(€.flit MEDIUK OPTIONAL STAKDARDS)
OPTION ?i 3,600 sq. , ft. € of Artk
4,LU Cq. 'ft. Average Lot Area
0,110 ft. Side Yard
20 ft. Front Yard
Zl'i ft. Rear jrd
36 ft. Lot Minima Width
E3 IGH ,2,2 3,500 sq. ft. Minim Lot A"m
4,000 sq. ft. Ayerage Lot Area
0/10 ft. Side 'lard
20 ft. Front Yard
15 ft. Rear Yard
45 Y t. Lot Minim n Width-
Regardless of whitt option the Commission selects, Staff
recommends' that design guidelines be created that defile the
City's expectations for innovative product. Zero Tat 1�ne, "Z"
- lot line, attached and serf- detached, side entry garages,
detached or rear-loaded garages, and offset rear lot liru:s aro
exakples of innovative techniques which can provide a dynamic
and attractive streetscape. TJ* type of environment that is
desired must be defined in terms of ade(Vxte open space;
greater spaciousness and variety.
B. Minimum Unit Size;
currently, the City has a 900 sq. ft. %dnivm unit size
requirement for single family units. Smaller units are
permitted will: A Conditional Use Permit to allow flexibility.
The city has no multi - family milli" standards it, place, the
size cf multi - family dwellings is Cootrolled by the Uniform
Building Code.
I
411
Ff�liY�tFiNa CitFSSFOt6 iii�;iP
'
Minimum unit Size /li`inimum tot size Study
December 4, 1986
Page 4
Based on Council direction,
the Commission has discusses this
issue previously, and
the following
options were briefly
considered ::
Existing Standard A&ssible ORtion
Single Family
900 sq. ft.*
1,0GO sq. ft.**
Multi - Family
LN
None
1,000 sq. ft.**
K
None
1,000 sq. ft.**
W
done
900 sq. ft.**
H
None
750 sq. ft.**
* less permitted with a CUP..
** 100 sq. ft. reduction permitted on 10% of the units.
Th date, no specific direction has been given to staff
relative to this issue.
C. niScussion. lihe question of appropriate minim= unit size is
" 46T sau ; answered, as it is very subjective in nature.
Appropr-,at unit size cannot be determined purely by technical
criteria. w her, it is a function of a variety of influences,
r,,pmunity expectations, market forties, etc.
used on existing policies, recent Commission actions, and
current development trends, staff could support an increase in
minimum size for single family dwellings from 900 to 1,000 sq.
ft. as proposed. If the Commission ?oncurs, the flexibility to
permit smaller units through the Conditional Use Process should
be retained.
For mr1Wi- family d011ings, staff has little policy direction
to -70 'In. The standards suggested were proposed based on the
City Of Opland,, accoe4ing to a City Council request. The
suggested minimums are graduated based on the density rang('
with smaller units generally permitted in H2-.ar density
categories.
In order to evaluate these standards, or to pre0are new ones,
staff will head some additional policy direction and clearer
definition of the problem.
If, for example, tha objective is to avoid overconcentration of
smaller units, statt can devetop criteria for an appropriate
unit mix.
Staff is requesting Commission discussion on this issue.
I MA
0
PLANNING COMNISSI `ORKSHOP
Minimum Unit Size /is,nimi Lot Size Study
December 4, 1985
Page 5
1
IV. HOUSING AFFORDABILITY: Prior to considering modifications to the
LM ve opmen s an rds, the Commission requested an overview on
how the City is meeting its affordability obligations. This
section provides a general overview, with emphasis on the Low
Medium land use category and single family detached housing.
A. Housing Goals: The City has" adopted housing goals for;..the
per o Mary 1983 through �)anaary 1988, based on the SoCAern
California Association of Governments Regional Husing
Allocation Model (RPM). The adopted five-year goal's are
outlined below:
Total New Housing 10,368
Affordable dousing 4,446
"Affordable" houoing goals are further broken down as new
housing units affordable to three income categories:
Category+ Annual Income Housing Goan
Very Low Income $13,400 1.210 units
Low Incrs:;� $21,440 1,361 units
Moderate Inge $32.160 1,875 Units
Total Affordable Units 4,446 units
B. Housing Accomplishments: Between January 1983 and October
1985, aa T _0f_ TW new units have b-en constructed. Of
these, 3,645 are vwlti- family, and 6,364 are single- family.
Therefore, with ovar a year tc says `rn the 2963 to 1988 period,
the total goal for syew housing has almost been Bret.
Our tfordablr housing goals are being implemented as follows:
New housing goals for Very Low Income Households (1,210 units)
are being implemented through provision rf multi - family rental
housing and senior housing (monthly rent of up to $335 or
subsidized). This type Of housing is not provided in the Low
Medium Residential category.
New housing goals for Low Income Households (1,361 units) are
being implemented through multi - family rental and multi- family
for puPchase housing (monthly rent of up to $536 or sales price
it up +.A $60,000). This type of housing is being provided for the
most part in the Medium, Medium High and High density
Residential districts.
pLANN -1ma CO"R'f %s �kMf .MT69k , HOP
.. Minimum Unit SiiiM, if►i Lot Size StUdy
December 4, 1986
page 6 -
New housing goals for the Model to Income Households (1,875
units) are being pro -vi ied thrn:,sgh either rentals `cup to SM
per month) or-for purchase hossing (up to $140,000). Although
no exact: fires are available without an in- depth study, it is
readilyf/,,appal -eni s> that °the City's moderate goals have been
substant' ally o). ),eeded.. To a great extent, the Low Medium
Residential caf;�gory is used to provide moderately prices
housing in the City. Of the 6,364 single -fmily dwellings
built in the`RHAM period so far, it can be safely stated that
substantially more than 1,875 units were aiffordable, =to ooderate
income families. Substantial numbers of aulti- family units
affordable to this income group were also constricted during
this period.
C. Conclusion: Even without an in -depth study. it is apparent
i:R ae"City is exceeding its moderate income housing
obligations, in substantial part due to development in the Low
Medium density category. We also appear to be doing reasonably
well in the lower income categories. However, a detailed study
would'be needed to determine precise number of units built and
sold or rented in each land use category.
Y. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Commission==aiscuss the
`
options TRTUBually to reach consensus 'whenever possible before
moving on to next issue.
I{
Respe -fully bi ted ,
i
Buller
i
Clty planner
;
j
l.�
E
STAFF REPORT �, }
Q
y
DATE: December 4 1986 ` 1977
TO :, Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROMi; Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Alan Marren, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: MULTI - FAMILY PARKING
1. BACKGROUND. On several previous ocgassions, the issue of parking
s an ar s for Multi - Family Proj s was discussed, with the
intention of improving both the usefu:'tness of required parking and
the quality of multiple family projet,ts in the city. A general
directiW was given to staff on severalj� specific parking issues for
incorporation to future development code amendments. So far,
consensus, was reached by the Commission on the following items:
a. Thee elimination of differences in the parking
standards between apartments and condominiums.
b. Garages should form a part of th°'= -+squired covered
parking. A garages only policy would not provide
desirable design results.
II. PARKING STANDARDSfNUMERICAL REQUIREMENTS: The issue of adequacy of
e exis ing numerical par King requirements was one significant
item that the Commission and Staff felt needed further research.
As a result a field survey was conducted by Staff of selected
multiple family complexes throughout the City. This survey
indicated that there was no lack of parking availability in the
majority of those complexes studiedt Where - parking problems were
noted, lack of availabe guest parking, wdS njt the cause of any
parking problem but the inconvenience of the W.,,king area location,
unwillingness of residents to park in appropriate locations, and
ger:eral undesirability (security, etc.) '`of the parking areas
appearad to be negative features which caused their under use.
Therefore Stiff does not recommend an overall increase in the ratio
cu ,,fenny applied to condominiums. The apartment rat os should be
increased as a result of the previous appraved policy to
condominium levels.
0--(3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MULTI- FAMILY PARKING
December 4, 1985
Page 2
r;
t
Those design issues which need to be addressed to improve the use
of parking areas should be iticluded in a. !-_vis��' design criteria
for multi - family developments. These °,- >robeni ence (safety features
should include the following:
a. Minimum distances from assigned spaces to units.
b. Reduce grade separations between proper units and
assigned parking areas.
c. Avoid "closed -in" parking areas with constricted
alley appearance of multiple garage structures.
d. Sufficient securit'j lighting to insure safe
'atmospherd for the resident, and visitor.
Staff would recommend a modification of how the standards are
applied. Currently .25 guest spaces per dwelling unit is required
in addition to the miniawm parking ratio reser `.ad for each unit.
Staff believes that it would be more appropriate to combine the
visitor parking into the ratio. to better rrnfIect the true total
parking requirem3nts. In a%- ltion, it is suggested that an
increase allocation for feir' bee 'room units be included to
anticipate greater demand for parking abota the three bedroom
units.
The iss, k of garage versus carports has been reduced, at previous
disco *,;ions, to a question of which is an appropriate mix of each
ty?e of covered parking. Staff believes one covered space per unit
should be the minimum requirement which is the current standard.
From this, Staff further believes that one -half of the required
covered spaces should be within an enclosed garage. This
allocation would provide an acceptLble mix of carports and garages
within a complex to break up the potential monotony of any single
type of parking structure. The following tables show the existing
and potential standards:
EXISTING PARKING SPACES PER UNIT
Type of Unit Spaces Required
Studio 1.3
One Bedroom 1.5
Two Bedroom 1.8
Three Bedroom 2..0
Four Bedroom and Larger 2.0
Note: In addition, open visitor parking is currently
required at the rate of .25 spaces per dwelling unit.
j--fq
11
11
El
AftbL
MULTI- FAMILY PAR
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
December 4, 1986
Page
POTEKIAL PARKIMG 99EWIREWKVSPACES PER LWIT
Tcatal Covered
ins-Of Unit Spaces Requiredl ►"Fes Requirwi2
Studio 1.50
One Bedroom 1.75 �
Two Bedroom 2.00 1
Three D&kv t 2.25
i;oatr Bedroom &larger 2.50 I
Watt: I .25 sPAces per Wit shall he hllocaated from the total
wing 4me* for open, assigned visitor perking Which shall
be aaintained for the life of the pw,ojact. 50% of the total
required covered spaces 'shall x within enclosed garage
structures.
Staff would like specific guidance from the Planning Comveission on
these nmerical space and covered parking, allocation
recortcmendations.
IY.1 DESIGN CRITERIA FOR COVERED PARKINSt Much of this analysis was
con a ned in t e prev ous report and is included again for more
specific Commission guidance on suggested provisions. In staff's
review of multiple family parking, two major issues surfaced from
which our analysis evolved. Firstly, multiple- family complexes are
designed generally around two opposite concepts which are as
follows
-
• Perimeter loo driveway and parking areas. This type
allotment p
adjacentsto the residential structures, but
adds a large degree ofinconvenience due to he lengthy
walking distance to the parking spaces. These
projects segregate "community activity" away from the
perimeter.
,r
• Dispersed driveway and parkIng areas This desfbn
type provides a gre`�@al of "Fr—convenience!fby
placing the parking spaces closer for adjacent tojito
the residential unit, but march of the poteni,�al
landscaped open space is used up by meandering
private streets and driveways. The driveway areas
become a part of the "community" activity inj,,this
type of project. "Tuck- tender" parking dictate;/this
type of design. While there are some advantages
associated with the concept of parking dispersed
throughout, the proportion of paved areas is
substantially higher.
f�
PLANNING COM+lISSION ST'AFF' REPORT
MULTI - FAMILY PARKING
December 4, 1986
Page 4
11
Design review policies should promote the positive features of both
types of site planning. Staff suggests that creative combinations
of these two types of plans should result in projects which exhibit
significant open spaces and still provide convenient parking
locations.
Secondly, while garages tend to convey a more substantial,
permanent development than those projects with carports, their use
exclusively does not necessarily provide a better project from a
design standpoint. Many projects with garages tend to exhibit a
cluttered, mono_: s and uninviting area of a complex.
With these issues i�! mind, Staff has drawn up a list of design
criteria for both garages and cargo is which could be incorporated
into existing developmdjt policies:
A. Site Design: Oa �4ss and reduced structure sass should be
prime c rscteristirs of parking area design as implemented by
the fol l oo f wn :
Y. Long, unbroken fines of opposing gara�*ejcarports on
each site of a,O*ive aisle should be avoided. This
type of design results in a '+,onstricted aitef
atmosphere.
2. Free standing garages /carports should be located to
not disrupt the primary vier of the residential
structure.
3. Views to 1rTidscfped areas should be-"maintained at the
ends of dries-aisles.. Vistas should not be obscured
by facing garages or, carports.
4. Planter breaks along the parking aisles. This
feature adds a landscaping element into the parking
drive aisle and can form an interesting pattern to
the driveway /parking are& rhythm.
5. Garages carports should be 11 ified to one side of a
lengthy drive aisle. Thi! fs ture would open up more
of the parking area to adjacent landscaped open
areas. it would further reduce the 'alley" effect
along the drive aisle.
B. Architecture: Garage and carport design should exhibit designs
iffich compatible, supportive and fuller integrated into the
overall architectural theme as implemented through the
following provisions:
J__f
PLANNINfi G S-6116W STAFF REPORT
MULTI FA. `''�LY PARlC2i&
December 4, 198
Page 5
1]
\1
I. Gara.++e�tmrport structures should be limited in length
(limit 8-12 cars). Long structures presenrt
difficulties in keeping proportion appropriate )kc,'th
the original design initftt on the main Structure.
2. Recognize plrage dwws as an elevent of design rythm .
and use to create varying patterns. Extensive use of
single width garage doors:, should be avoided. The
perception of increased density can result fro►;a
parking area with I* ?ge washers of garage door sa�t
Further, an overly rM�ti tious pattern of doors can
be +aonotonous and di4, 9ult to design around. 6cjble lj
width doors in carob cation with singles can tetlp
the prom f.
3. 'Flimsy`, ' stick -like carport designs which portray
an add -on, after(liought, non - permanent perception of
the parking area hould be avoided. 'Plant -.ons' and
oMr elements should be integrated into the
structure design to convey a mare substantial_ and
permanent concept for the carports.
4. 'Hang -on' storage units which again appegr to be
afterthoughts to' the carport design shmil d be
avoided.
Additional criteria may be, developed with tie Commission's
direction, and staff is requesting a deteM, nation on the
appropriateness of these provisions.
IV. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning direct staff
to incorpora a the revised parking ratios in the next text
amendment to the Development Code. In addition it is recommended
that guidltrce be provided for the implementation of specific design
provisio►a5 -with the Development Code or Design Review procedures.
Res fuily,ssf�mitted,
Brad ul
.�- --
City Planner
Ak:BB.vc
11
i:i
i
i
PtLTI
FAMMILY PARKING SURVEY
PROJECT/
UNIT
PARKING
PARXING
GENERAL LOCATION
TYPE
TYPE
AVAILABILITY
NOTES
Mk)MVE)i
Apartments
Open Carport
Excellent
Parking
(tewn & haven)
(1ODS Sub-
significantly
sidized)
under- utilized
SUNRIDGE
Redttal
Tuckunder
O.K.
Partly unoccupied
(19th & Hermosa)
Condos
Garages
DON. MIGUEL
Apartmwts
Open
Good
Some street
(19th & Archibald)
(26% Sub-
Carports
Plenty in back
parking --
siiized)
convenience?
SLWSCAPE
Apts /Condos
Open
Good
Pre -City project
(19th & Carnelian)
Carports
Plenty in back
SIMSCAPE II
Condos
(19th & Beryl)
COarports
Plenty in back
EASTWOD
Apartments
Tuckunder
O.K.
Pre -City project;
(Carnelian &
Carports &
cluttered
Base Line)
Open
RANCHO IEADOMS
Rental
Tuckunder
O.K. but
Parking on aprons;
(Base Line & Hellman]
Condos
Garages
Numerous cars
Partly vacant?
parked inappro-
priately
SYCAMORE SPRINGS
Rental
Detached
Extreme short-
High proportion II
(Archibald & Lomita)
Condos
Garages
age of visitor
of required parking 1
parking
in garages
HERITAGE PARK
Senior
Open Only
Excellent
Parking
(Archibald & Lomita)
Apartments
under- utilized
az
PROJECT/
GENERAL LOCATION
UNIT
TYPES
PARKING
PARKING
AYAILABILIT'tNOTES
NNU AORO N VILLAS
Condos
Tuckunder
very good;
(Archibald & Tryon)
Garages
Visitor parking
Q.K.; no problems
RANCHO VILLAS
Apartments
Detached
Very good
Parking in
(Ramona & Foothill)
Garages
street --
convenience?
a,
`
MOODSONG
Rental
Open
Good
Plenty out back
(Vineyard & Foothill)
Condos
Carports
QRCt1ifRQ MEADOWS
Condos
Attached
Very good
(Vineyard)
Garages
NRlLWRRY PLACE
Condos
Tuckufiiler
Inade44� te;
Parking on aprons;
(Vi ne`yard & Arrow)
Garages
No guest:`
vacant fi el d
parking
w
PEPPERDOOD
Apartments
Open
Good
Plenty out back
(Foothill)
Carports
lOt1Nl'AINSIDE
Apartments
Open
O.K.
(Foothill & Hell. �J
DISCOVERY TOWNKG ES
Condos
Detached
O.K., but
Some Illegally
(Archibald & Feron)
Garages
some problems
parked cars
TERRA VISTA
Apartments
open
Q.K.
(2 on Spruce)
Carports
TERRA VISTA
Condos
Detached
Some inappro-
Not fully
Spruce)
Garages
priately
occupied?
parked cars
T'
az
i
MINUTES OF
PLANNING c4ft SSIDN WORKSHOP
THURSDAY DECEMBER 4, 1986 7:30 P.M.
(following Oozign Review Committee Meeting)
Neighborhood Center
9791 Arrow
Rancho Cucamonga
SUBJECT: MINIMUM LOT SIZEiMINI N UNIT SIZE DISCUSSTOR
PURPOSE: This workshop is scheduled to facilitate Commission review
of minim= lot sizes, minimum unit sizes, and related
development standards.
Chairman E. David Barker called the workshop m"t�ng to order at 7;45
p.m.
DOLL CALL Commissioner Darkee X Commissioner MCNiel E
Commissioner Chitiea "X`"— Comsmiasioner Tol stoy =
WORKSHOP
Brad Buller, City Planner, explained the purpose of the workshop as a
"kickoff" discussion.
Dan Coleman tend Otto Kroutil, Senior Planners, presented the staff
report.
Bob Salazar, red resenting the Baldy View Region Building Industry
Association, stated that the BIA would not make a formal presentation,
but wc,ald refer to representatives of the William Lyon Company and. Leis
Homes.
Jim Bailey, representing the William Lyon Company, stared that the
a Planned Communities were, in themselves, innovative; therefore should be
considered differently than rest of City. He indicated that buyers
prefer to be able to walk around their house rather than attached
housing. M► ^. Bailey state4 that it cost £'0,OOC more to build The
Mea4ows project and 45 days longer because of the attached
construction. He also indicated than increasing minim= unit size from
900 sq. ft. to .,060 sq. ft. will not improve quality and would cost
£3,200 more to build the additional 100 -sq. ft. Mr. Bailey stated that
Victoria's 3,000 sq. ft. lot protect, The Park, has been criticized
*infairly because of its small lots and that they -�Duld like to build
more. He indicated they, are developing & sqi ;ft, wide, 3.000 sq. ft.
single family lot Concept.
John Melcher, representing Lewis Homes, stated general agreep:nt with
Mr. rtailey's comments. However, he indicated that LeWs Homes would
11 °e additional time to review the staff report options for minimum lot
size ana that another waAshop be held on this issue. Mr. re ?cher
stated that development standards should be included in future
discussion. He stated agreement with the proposed 1,000 sq. ft. minimum
unit size for single famriiy dwellings. Mr. Melch2r stated that Lewis.
Home, is opposed to the proposed unit size onttons for multi- family
dwellings. He indicated general agreement xith the proposed parking
ratios For multi - family projects.
Mr. Buller indicated that development standards were an integral part of
the total solution to the problem; and. w':uld be included in future
discussion on lot size.
Chairman Barker began Commission discussion and indicated that
innovation should be defined and includes the idea o� variety and
change. Builders west use a little imagination in designing T,mo;a S _
products. He requested graphics, to cx{rain the necessity of the
proposed changes under the Low Medium Basic Development Standards.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the mVkimum unit size increase of NO
sq. ft. for single family is not an issue of quality, rather it is an
issue of Livable space.
Micnael Yairin, representing tho Deer Creek Crnpany, requested
clarification regarding whether the proposed Ill foot s,.:eyard under the
Basic Development Standards must be flat.
sir. Buller responded that in certain instances it Aid not have to be
flat. He also indicated that staff is concerned with providing adequate
a:cess to the rear yard.
Discussion followed regArding the proposed 10 foot sideyard, .o
consensus was reached by the Commission.
Mr. Bailey stated that increasing the sideyard setback an additional 5 _
feet would not provide streetscape variety.
Otto Kroutil stated that we must focus on the total solution rather than
individual standards, A combination of design techniques end
development standards must be used to address this issue.
Mr. Bailey indicated that it might be acceptable to require 10 foot
sideyards on a percentage of lots within a tract.
Commissioner Chitioa agreed.
dy)
Discussion followed concerning minimum unit size. The consensus of .the
Commission was that 1,000 sq. ft. for single family dwellings `ties
acceptable and no further staff analy�iis was necessary. The Commission
U directed staff to refer the multi- faq:py minimum unit size back to the
City Council for clarification of the „Oroblem, z
Discussion followed concerning multi-family g multi - y parking.. The consensus' of
the:,Oompission was that two (2) covered parking spaces should be
required for, three and four: bedroom units.. There was also consensus
that -where* mo,* enclosed garages were used,- additional open parking
should be,* required.
Mr. Melcher stated that in terms of design cfliteria for covered parking,
shortening the allowable length of an uninterrupted garage would be
preferable to requirng double width doors.
i
Meeting was adjourned at 9:45 to the Decattr 10, 1986 regular Planni44
Comission meeting. j
h.
k
DATE:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ST"F REPORT
October 8, 1966
`Gt�CAlyp
S
1977
TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Manner
BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Manner
Alan Marren, Associate Planner
SUBJECT; MODIFICATIONS TO MULTI - FAMILY:- PARKING STANDARDS - A
proposal, to amend the *_ve oceen o upgra existing
parkinti requirements for all multi- faq',y projects
1. BACKGROUND : On several previous occasions;;,__ .,h the City Co'incil
and _ fanning Commission discussed the issue of parking
standards for multi - family projects, with the intention of
modifying existing parking standards to improve both the usefulness
�,' required parking and the quality of multi- family projects in the
City. So far, the Commission provided staff with; specific
direction in the followinq areas:
A. Eliminate the diff--recces in parking standards between
a a�rtmen s and condominiums. The Commission felt-that recent
tr- ern s in multi-family vwlopment in Rancho Cucamonga have
obliterated virtually all differences between condominiums and
apartments relative to parking, partly due to the fact that
apartrsent projects are built with future conversions in mind,
and many condominiums are being rented out as apartments. As a
result, the Commission directed staff to prepares a single set
of parking standards applicable to all multi- family projects,
without the distinction between ownership and mental housing.
B. Consider increasing the e- fisting numerical reouirements. she
oaten ss on inoicated that 'the e— zisting n- 5iFFi'cat standards are
at times inadequate, and instructed staff to look into the
issue with the intention of assuring an adequate number of
parking spaces in all multi twzily projects.
C. Develop criteria for covered parking. The Commission expressed
a preference for requiring covereT parking within enclosed
garages However, the Commission also recognized that ere
are certain problems associated with garages, and that garages
are not the best solution in all situations. Staff was
requested to develop cri*A*ia. under which garages or .carports
may be acceptable to fulTv,(V tae covered parking requirements,
and also to develop stronger design standards for parking
structures in general.
.J 3
-
_ I � 4
PLANNING COMMTSW04 A#* ,R, 0ORT
Modifications to Mdlt;4aWilr Parking Standards
October 8, 1966
Page 2
This repurt disczsses issues relative to increasing the existing
numerical standards and criteria for covered parking in two
so!oarate sections, which follow:
I1. PARKIM STANDARDSAUMERICAL REQUIREMENTS: Based on previous
�'omm�'s io�r direct on, ex Fq mt!l amily standards for both
apartment units and townhomesltondos would look as shown on the
chart below:
PARKING SPACES PEit''UNIT
Total Covered
Type of Unit Seaces Required Spaces Required
Studio 1.3 1.0
One Bedrom 1,5 1.0
Two Bedroom 1,8 1.0
Three Bedroom 2.0 .1, 0
Four Bedroom and Larger 2.0 1.0
Note: In addition, open visitor parking is currently required at
the. -ate of .25 spaces per dWelling unit.
A review of existing multi - family projects recently constructed in
the City that are fully occupied would seem to indicate that
existing standards do not always guarantee that,parking needs of
all projects are fully met on site. This is exhinited in the small
amount hf overflow parking taking place along public streets along
the periphery of several projects, particularly those with a _
greater proportion of larger units. This would seem to indicate
that consideration of slight increase in the number of spaces
required may be in order, particularly where larger units are
involved.
Based on our experience, staff would suggest the following criteria
for the purposes of discussion:
FLAWNG GQMIM ESSION ;QWF REPORT
a
Mcdi ficati ons to Multi- Family Parking Stp,-' ,45
October 8, 1986
Page 3
E ?3TENTIAL PARKING REQUIREMiENTS /SPACES PER UNIT
Total Covered
Type of Unit Spaces Required Spaces Required
Studio 1.3 1
One Bedroom 1.5 1
Two Bedroom 2.0 1
Three Bedroom 2.5 2
Four Bedroom and Larger 3.0 2
Again, visitor parking would be required at the existing rate of
.25 spaces per dwelling unit.
1� %
It should be noted that the most marked increases are suggested for
the larger units, and that two covered spaces wnuid be considered
for units of three bedrooms or larger. It should also be noted
that these potential modifications have not been discussed with the
development community at any length. it is suggested that adequate
feedback be obtained prior to any final action.
III. CRITERIA FOR COVERED MARKING
A. Application: As already mentioned, the Commission expressed a
preference for fully encios2d garages rather than carports, but
recognized that carports may work better in certain specific
situations. Based on this direction, the following text lay be
considered for inclusion do the City's Development Code:)!
;i
For all 'jrequired cornered parking spaces, garage structures
shall be;jprovided. The City recognizes. however. that specific
site pr design features may result in conditions which warrant _
limiti;d use of carports in udder to attain ' of the following
desirod results:
1. Reduce building mass within the complex.
2. Open up limes of sight from parking area to landscape area
or to significant architectural features.
3. Allow design flexibility to provide variations in site and
architectural features where deemed ' desirable and
necessary.
In any project, however, no less than SM of the required
covered spaces may be in garages.
PLANK114G C"ISS OR STAFF REPORT
Modifications to Multi -FWly Parking Standards
October S, 1986'
Page 4
ii
B. Uesi n. w In staff's review of multiple �amiS��parOng, two
ma or ;ssues s;rfaced from which (mr analysis d'�olv*d.
Firstly, multiple- family complexes r� .designed �4verally
around two opposite Concepts which arm as follows;
a. Perimeter loop drivewa and parking areasr This type of
s gn Provides a max nteeri or open space allotment
adjacent to the residential structures, but adds a large
degree of inconvenience, due to the lengthy walking distance
to the qi� ing spaces. These projects segregate comeunity
activity" away from the perimeter.
b. Dispersed driveway and Rarking areas. This design type<
provides a great deal of user convenience by placing the
parking spaces closer for adjacent tom, to the residential
unit, but much of the potential landscaped op6.� space is
used up by meanderi° private streets and driveways. The
driveway areas beco a part of the °Ccommunity" activity in
this type of p),oject. "Tuck- under" parking dictates this
type of design:` While there are some advantages associated
with the concept of parking dispersed throughout, the
pr;jsortion of paved ark-s is substantially higher.
Secondly, while garages tend to convey a more substantial,
permanent development than those projects with carports, their
use exclusively does W. necessarily provide a better project
from a design standpoint. Hany projects with garages tend to
exhibit a cluttered, monotonous and uninviting area of a
complex.
With these issues in mind, !4taff has drawn up a list of design
criteria for both garages and carports which could be
Incorporated into ekirting development policies:
Site Design: ttpesrness and reduced structure mass should be
prime UNFE stics of parking area design as implemented by
the following:
1. Long, unbroken lines of opposing garages /car�arts an
each site of a dr,ve aisle should be avoideC This
type of design results in a rconstricted alley"
atmosphere:.
2. Free standing garages /carports should be located to not
disrupt the primary view of the residential structure.
PLANNING COMMir" , OM a Jkfd 2PORT
Modifications 'to 13t1iti- Paunily Parking Standards
October 8, 1986
Pane 5
3. Viewqj to landscaped areas sgroald, be maintained at the
. eiofdrive aix'�es. Vistas shald' not be obscured by
g
' fact rages or carporU.
4. Planter breaks along the parking aisles. This feature
adds a landscaping element into the parking drive aisle
i and can form an,, interesting pattern to the
driveway/parking area rhythm.,,\
S. Garages/carports should be iititegd to one side of a
} leng 1W drive aisle. This feature would open up more
of the parking " to adjacent landscaped "`open
areas. it would further re" tNe ®alliWu effect
along the drive aisle.
Architecture: Garage and carport design should exhibit designs
which am E51patible, supportive and foully integrated into the
overall architectural Vnn as implemented through the
following provisions:
1. Garage /carport structures should be limited in length it
(limit &12 var3 ?. Long structures present
Ask
difficulties in;: keeping proportions appropriate with
the original design intent an the main structure.
r 2. Recognize garage doors as an element of design rbytho
and use to create varying patterns. Extensive use of
single Wt-". garage doors should be avoided. The:
perception of increased density can result from a
psrkieng area with large numbers of garage doors.
Further, an overly' repetitious pattern of dr ca an be
Monotonous and difficult to design around. Double
width doors in coabination with singles can help remedy
the problem.
3. 'F7iny', 'stick- file` carport designs which portray an
add -on, afterthought, non-permanent peraepti&- of the
parting area should be avoided. 'Plant -ens' and other
elements should be integrated into the structure design
to conM a more substantial and permanent concept for
the carports.
0
4. •Hang -one storage units which again appear to be
afterthoughts to the carport design should be avoided.
Additional criteria may be developed with the Commission's
direction.
U -27
fdoctif c * o t-gy4p., iiy Parklntg 5t rdards
Qcta�;ar "$y 1985 �
Page b
} IY. R6Ctl i l IO)I$ It is recomaended ,:at the �Cosrxtssion i ?++
'I specific direction in the ari�4x cutlinedP If
- dppropriat�e; Staff can be directed to mate
prepare apprept
Ordinances for future consideration by the Planning Comission ,ind .
the City Council.
4ReS fully tted
Bra Bu le
City Planner
BB:OK:AW :ns
r -
i
w: %lei
R. MODIFICATIONS TO MULTI - FAMILY PARKING "
STANDARDS - A proposal to ?- ,d the
ueve opmen e o upgra a ex�s ti ng park! ng requi rements for fi11 iiul ti-
family projects.
Otto Kroutil, Senior planner, presented the staff report.
Chairman Stout referred to the architecture of carports, garages, and storage
units and suggested 'should" be deleted and replaced with � "shall ".
Additionally, he stated that the lighting for the carports Should be
architecturally integrated with t� ,rest of the project. With respect to the
criteria for parking and site desi'_ ; he requ led additional information from
staff.
Commissioner MCNiel suggested that compact car parking space requt:7ements be
locked at as well.
Commissioner Chitiea stated that double striping in all parking lots should be
studied. She felt that only double striping shou.1 be used,
Brad Buller, City Planner, advi.ved that staff would study these issues as -part
of the amendments to the Development Code.
RKf.�was directed to provide the< Commission with further information for
iderarton at s later meeting,
PUBLIC COMMENTS r
Gary Madison, 10551 Lemon, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the Commission relative
to Conditional Use Permit 84.31, the Diversified Shoppi% Center. He was
concerned that approximate and not exact measurements were used in staff's
presentation of the report. He felt that a lot of development mistakes have
been made in this area of the f: „, and urged that more careful consideration
be given in the future.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
P. DISCUSSION OF MINIMUM LOT SIZES AND MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZES FOR SINGLE
FA14LLY DETACHED AND ZERO LOT IINE HOUSIR
Jack Lam, Community Development Director, presented slides for the
Commission's consideration.
Commissioners McNiel and Toistoy were selected to work with staff on the
development of a program and a schedule for addressing thi,, issue.
Planning Commission Minutes -i8- October 6, 1585
t
g.
E
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMDWA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOIND'ING APPROVAL CF DEVELOPMENT COOL AMENDMENT N0.
87 -02, AMENDING SECTION 17.12.440 PERTAINING TO PARKING
ALLOCRTiON STAND=: AND ENCLOSED GARAGES, SECTION
17.08.090 PERTAINING 1'O GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINEq FOR
PARKING AREAS, AND & -CTION 17.08.040 PERTAINING TO
M1111". RESIDENTIAL UNIT SIZE OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ORDINANCE 90. 211
WHEREAS, on the 14th day of October, 1987, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the
California Goverment Code.
SECTION. 1. the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following'%1ndings:
1. That the Amendment is warranted to permit improved
parking afi residential unit size standards; and
2. That the proposed Development Code Amendment wound
not have significant impact on the environment; ani
3. That the proposed Development Code Amendment is in
conformance oath the goals and policies of the
General Plan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho-Cucamonga Planning Commission hau found that
this pro e_ w not create a significant adverse impact on the environment
and recommends issuence of a Negative Declaration on October 14, 1987`;
PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO.
RE:: DCA 87 -02
October 14, 1587
Page 2
(a)
Studio: 1.3 off - street parking spaces per unit
of which one space shall be in a garage or
carport.
(b),
One (1) bedroom: 1.5 off- street parking spaces
per unit of which one space shall be in a garage
or carport.
(c)
Two (2) bedrooms: 1.8 off - street parking spaces
po unit of YAich o/e space shall be in a garage
or carport. �
(d)
Three (3) bedrooms: 2.0 off - street parking
spaces per unit of which two spaces shall be in
"
a garage or carport.
(e)
Four (4) or more .bedroams: 2.3 off-street
parking spaces pew unit of which two spaces
shall be in a garage or carport.
(f)
In addition to the required number of parking
spaces for each unit, one off - street uncovered
parking space shall be provided for each four
units for visitor parking. For,- single family
zero lot line, patio hoes, and duplexes, on-
street parking may be substituted for visitor
parking, where sufficient street pavement width
E
and distance between driveways has been
provided'.
(g)
Fifty percent (50%) of the total; required
coved es shall be within enclosid garage
(h)
For developments containing five or more units,
up to thirty -five percent (3$ %) of the required
uncovered spaces my be compact car size.
;i1
The use of carports requires approval from the
Design Review Committee.
B.
Section 17.12.040 A.3 - rtmenfis shall be deleted in
i
total..
C.
Section 17.08.040 C.4 shall be amended with the following
additions:
(a)
Site Design: openness, reduced structure mass
and convenience of use should be prime
characteristics of parking area design as
implemented by the following:
• Planter breaks should be included along the
parking aisles. This feature- adds a
landscaping element into the par:.rq drive
aisle and can forme an interesting pattern to
tine dri*Z;Ay /parking area rhyme.
• In order to open up more of the parking area
to adjacent landscaped areas and reduce the
Mallet' effect along the drive aisle, offset
facing garages /carports are encouraged on
lengthy drive aisles.
W Architecture: Garage and carport structures
should +exhibit designs which are compatible,
supportive and fully integrated into the overall
architectural them as implemented through the
following provisions:
a Leag structures present difficulties in
keeping proportions appropriate with the
original design intent on the main
structures and therefore time Wage/carport
structures should be limited to 8.12 cars.
o Recognize garage doors as an element of
design rhythm and use to create varying
patterns. Extensive use of single width
garage doors should be avoided. The
perception of increased density can result
from a nrking area with large numbers of
garage doors. An overly repetitious pattern
of mm can be monotonous and should be
PLANNING COWI5510N RFS LMON NO.
�F' RE: DC'A 8702
x sober 14, 1987
3
o
Parting areas (open and covered) shall be
designed to provide parking spaces
conveniently located to the units they are
intend►,d to serve.
? o
Long, unbroken lines of opposing
garages /carports' on each sfide of a drive
aisle should be avoided. This kpre of
design results in a 'constructed iiley°
atmosphere.
` a
Free„ standing garages /carports shuld be
located not to disrupt the primary view of
residential structures.
E
0
Tiexs to landscaped areas should be
maintained at the ends of drive aisles.
Vistas should not be obscured by facing
garages or carports.
• Planter breaks should be included along the
parking aisles. This feature- adds a
landscaping element into the par:.rq drive
aisle and can forme an interesting pattern to
tine dri*Z;Ay /parking area rhyme.
• In order to open up more of the parking area
to adjacent landscaped areas and reduce the
Mallet' effect along the drive aisle, offset
facing garages /carports are encouraged on
lengthy drive aisles.
W Architecture: Garage and carport structures
should +exhibit designs which are compatible,
supportive and fully integrated into the overall
architectural them as implemented through the
following provisions:
a Leag structures present difficulties in
keeping proportions appropriate with the
original design intent on the main
structures and therefore time Wage/carport
structures should be limited to 8.12 cars.
o Recognize garage doors as an element of
design rhythm and use to create varying
patterns. Extensive use of single width
garage doors should be avoided. The
perception of increased density can result
from a nrking area with large numbers of
garage doors. An overly repetitious pattern
of mm can be monotonous and should be
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.
RE: DCA 87 -02
October 14, 1487
Page 4
o *Flimsy ", 'stick -like• carport designs which
Portray and add -on, afterthought, non-
�aknent perception are not desirable
uracteristics of 4 parking area.
'kbstantial design elements should be
lnlegraW into the structure to convey a
more persA ent concept for the carports.
o 'H - �antorage units which again appear
should be avoi afterthoughts the carport design
C. Section 17.08.040 B - Minimum Dwelling Units Size shall be
-amended to read as follows:
VL L LM
Single fully detached 1,000 sq.ft.* 1,000 sq.ft.* 1,000 sq.ft.*
dwellings only
*A single family deta6aed dwelling less than 1,000 sq.ft. will
require the approval of a ,Conditional Use Permit per Section
1'.04.030.
11
0. Sectior, 17.08.040 C - Minimu,; Dwelling Units Size shall be
amended as follows:
L LM M
Single family, detached 1,000 sq.ft.* 1,000 sq.ft.* 1,000 sq.ft.*
dwellings only
*A single family detached dwelling less than 1,000 sq.ft. will
require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit per Section
17.04.030.
2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends tt.a. the City
Council approve and adopt Development District Amendment
87 -02
3.7hat a certified copy of ''this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shalt
be forwarded to the City Council.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1487.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNleT, -ZTaaf man
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary
A.
6
October 14,, "7 /
Zr _.
I / 6rad �' l ler D!l
y the Planning Coamistion of the :tty^ of
�ncho t`er, � � da hereby c t at the forPmroing !Resolution duiy''and
►gularly introduced, s�ed, and a4pt^ed by tt:a Plannin_a_Coaaission of tie
Q�t, of Rancho Cucamonga6 at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
ddhh the 14th day, of October, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS.
NOES: COMISSrORERSt
' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
14
1
i�
F
CITY OF RAi` OR0 CUCAMONGA Gv��MO
''A ir�iri9
O
w
F rb Z
U
t;
!
DATE: October 24, 1987
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
fROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 86-02 - CASALETTI - The review of
providing of ve ip er a nmen an . anc4ng.in conjunction
with the Pu;Ka Pa -ce Restaurant lovated at 12583 Highland
Avenue
I. ABSTRACT: During 1986, the City Council adopted frdinance. 290
regarding regulation of entertainment uses. The Ordinance r"',Ires
that establishments which provide entertainment must obtain an
Entertainment Permit from the City, 'rie applicant is requesting
for revier ano approval of an Entertainment Permit for a liva band
a
and polka dancing.
II. ANALISIS: The Caaaletti Polka Palace has been operating for 40
years aT its current location and features the serving of food and
alcoholic beverages, in addition, to dancing., Entertainment for
customers i. provided by live 'band for the listening pleasure
and /are dancing enjoyment of patrons. Currently, polka music is
provided every Saturday by a live band and on special occasions.
Saturday evening dat-ing hours are from 8:30 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. and
there is a $,3.00 per person admission charge. Lunch and dinner is
serv:d Monday through Saturday.
Anne and Robert Casaletti are responsW a for the management of the
Casaletti Polka Palace and any eniz;tainment. In accordance with
Section 5.12.040, the Entertainment Ordinance, the applicant has
Indicated that neither the applicant nor any persons rosponsibie
for the management or supervision of the Casaletti Polka Palace
has, within the previous 10 year,, been convicted of a crime nor
has the applicant ever had ac.y permit or license issued in
conjunction with the sale of alcohG? or provision of entertainment
revoked at this establishment.
Section 5.12.130 of the Entertainment Ordinance requires that a
duly licensed and uniform security guard shall be "-*.attendance at
all times where dancing is permitted or allowed if 'the dare floor
is in excess of 150 square feet. The Casaletti Polka Palace
contains a large dance floor area of several hundred square feet in
ITEM K
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
EN ERTAINNENT PERMIT 86-02 - ,.ASAL 11
October-14,4987
Page 2
Ab
size. This ordinance does not require the applicant to supply
information regarding vhether a security guard is currently
provided and the applicant has not indicated such in their
application. Therefore; staff would recommend a condition if
approval to provide a security guard for the Entertainment Permit.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Casaletti Polka Palace and,, `-sociated
entertainment is conducted iti a sa'e and orderly manner; 'Further,
the applicant has stated that neither the applicant nor any other
person associated with the management or supervision of yhe
Casaletti polka Palace have not been convicted of any offeni;e
involving the presentation, exhibition or performance of any
obscene show of any kin.1 or of a felihny or any crime involving
morol turpitude cr has had any approval'parmit or, license issued in
conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of
entertainment revoked within the preceding five years. Approval of
this Entertainment Permit would not create a public nuisance or
int:rfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding resiCnntial
neightorhood. To the best of staff's knowledge, the applicant has
not made any false, mislea0 ng or fraudulent statements of Uteritl
fact on the required application.
U. REC"ENOATION: Staff recocmuends that the Planning Commission
can i ona7T` approve an Entertainment. Permit for the Casaletti
Polka Palace through adoption of the Resrl= ;:tion of Approval.
Respec lly submitted,
r
City Pl ner
BB:DC :ko
Attachments : Application
Exhibit "A" Location Map
Resolution of Approval
PARS' N
City of Rancho Unifoftn
Cucamonga Application
pZp PART ! - - r:,. ,� >�:... APer FILE NDfi,
V LOCATION OF PROJECT{ADOREarya RELATED FI!'eS
NAME —
OPOSED.ROJECT
APPLICANTSNAME
Anne & Robert Dasaletti
ADDRESS
i 12583 Hk4le -ad Ave, Rtiwa 2 a ,
GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED ..
I
QWNERBNAME
Z
Anne Casaletti
ADDRESS
I` B
12 8 Hi hland Ave . Etiwanda
1E12 DISTRICT GENERAL PLAN EXIS1
714,- 899 -1016
EXIiT1NG STgUt'TU9ESQUARE FOOTAGE PROPOS 6I- VU1UESQUARE FOOTAGE
REVIEW REQUESTED z,
z ^ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT*
— CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT —
NON CONSTRUCTION•
D DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
(ZONE CHANGE)
LLt ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
C MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
LLJ � G MINOR ::XCEPTION
PRELIMINARY REVIEW*
�— _It is macs mandatory to complete I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT(ATTACH ADDITI?h
• TECHNICAUDESIGN'REVIEW
COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL*
• TECHNICAUDESIGN REVIEW —
RESIDENTIAL*
• TOTAL DEVELOPMENT
• BASIC SYAANDARDS.
• OPTIONA*_ STANDARDS
• CUSTOM LOTIS.;aDIViSION
• DESIGN REVIEW
ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT
I EL It of t e Uniform Annfinnf inn
i
,.e are a food e=tablishmsnt servintr Beer and wine. We are a
2 1 Tamil- oriented business with Polka Dancing on Saturday nights.
�.�n .h and Iii nner is ar+rvsxA tllonday thFOUah Saturday. Banouet .Facilities
1C4ilabie for dinners and wedding parties.
LL
OWNER CERTiftCATtON sus , ., 7. .
Z I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY.
LLI FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OFTHIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE
ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. AGENT OF OWNER MUST ATTACH A LETTER OF
AUTHORIZATION FROM THE LEGAL OWNER.
Q DATE.L� /i"' Il/ StGNATL;RE: p{
CL rAINTNAME &TITLE: UF- CEA E �Tt �►Y�
w - _.
i "ERE -- — r O s FEuS RECEIVED gECE PT NO.
!
Casalettits Palma Palace RestBtait
3 . dpa7n�y6 & E9bert Casaletti 125 }p.`
2.
Casalatitils Polka aee Restaurant
Ca 91739. :.1283 aiad Ave
$iwanda
' 3.
We hates Polka MUSia ever, Saturd rn�j�'Shadtb.T a live bands
On ,$peti`i81 OCCB$�.QD.S we have tia j,
ii
F.
" 'Ci MititnAa7Q y
a :Sti
Eti�randa. � 3 &MOing is held at �'�683 git�hlsnd= Ave. .
Hours
daaci are f1rom 8s 30PZ to l e OOAM for
n6• Thezis is a3.QU
Per *�er3Sdn admission chage,
r'
5.
Rune & Robert Casaietti.
S.
This is a food establisment "
with danoi
Beer find wine are served at all times. GM S%turday nights.
7.
None.
1
8.
License has newer been revoked.
�
5.
We 1tave been at tbr, same location ftr 0
Ou8tomers are well satisfied v►it3i'
xears and am
that
we present. the kind
nment
�
14
7
� -3
'Vl' q.*./
fvV A N" A V24
.5k.
13 LOT 114
AMAS r, 'WEtWIM
'vxzw3
RESOLUTION NO,
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 86.02 FOR LIVE BAND POLKA
DANCING FOR CASALETTI'S POLKA PALACE RESTAURANT LOCATED
AT 12583 HIGHLAND AVENUE
A. Recitals.
(i) Anne A Robert Casaletti have filed an application for the
issuance of Entertainment Permit No. 86-02 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Entertainment Permit
request is referr d to as "the application".
(ii) On the 14th of October, 1 '387, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public 'clearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
i. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced public hearing on October 14„ 1987, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The.appiication applies im property located at 12583
Highland Avenue and is presently improved witv�' structures and parking areas ,
wh±ch constitutes the Casaletti's Polka Palace Restaurant; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant,
the property to the south of that site consists of single family residential,
the property to the east is single family residential* and the property to the
west is single family residential; and
(c) The applied for entertainment use has been operat3n7, at
this location for 40 years; and
(e) The structure has a dance floor area of several hundred
square feet in area; and
(d) The proposed entertainment, as conditioned,
complies with City of Rancho Cucamonga Code requirements.
hereby
1�
i
PLANNING - CO MISSION RESOLUTION NO
ENTERTAINgeut PE*'i 85-62 - CASALMI
ictober 14, 1987
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to thja'Commission
during,,the above- refervAlced public hearing and upon the speciffc findings of
facts 0 forth in paragraphs 1 and et' above, this Commission hereby finds and
cancludei`, as follows
(a) That the con &rt of the establishment or the
granting, of �Zbe application would, not be
contrary to the public health, safety,- s
or welfare; and
(b) That the premises or establishment are not
likely to be operated in an illegal, improper
or disorderly manner; and
(c) That the applicant has not had any approval,
permit or license issued in conjunction with
the sale of alcohol or the provision of
entertainment- revoked within the; preceding five
years; and
(d) That granting the application would not create
a public nuisance; and
(e) That the normal operation of the premises would
not interfere with the peace and quiet of any
surrounding residential neighborhood; and
(f) The applicant has not made any false,
misleading or fraudulent statement of material
fact in the required application.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set north in paragraph
',, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby, approves the application subject to
each and every condition set forth below:
(a' Expansion of the dance floor area or increase
in the scale or intensity of entertainment
shall require application for modification of
this permit.
(b) All persons conducting a public dance or any
entertainment where dancing by patrons or
customers is permitted, shall have in
attendance at the premi, -js for the purpose of
supervising the dancing and the conduct of all
patrons and customers, a duly licensed and
uniformed security guard at all times such,
dancing is permitted or allowed. E7owever, the-
provisions ions of this condition shall apply only
pp y _ _y
Where a dance floor or dance area in excess oi'
one hundred fifty square feet is ava4lable or
designated for dancing by customers or patrons.
PLAlitd�IF CS�R4&ION NO.
E{iTF tYAk NT" P� j?- C,$SALETTI
Octcober 14, 1987 "
Page 3
f
5• 1'Oe Deputy Secretary„ to this Co
mmissian shalt certify to the
adoption of this Resolution. 1
APPROVED AM ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1487.
PLANNINO COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Larry T.Wgiel, ChalMayi:
ATTE'Sr:
Brad u Ter, Deputy- weetary
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was dc•ly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by, the Planning Commission tit �"e
` City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
` < on the 14th day of October, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
` ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
0
-- vi WX Au l av vvvtuVAW4� n G<}C AiLj0
STAFF REPORT
.t
a
0
F � e
U
DATE: October 14, 1987 1977
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 87 -02 - Le -H - The review of
proviaing 01SE 3ockey, live banis. c61edy acts and dancing
in conjunction with the Club Hi -Brow to be located at r
1004 Foothill Boulevard
I. ABSTRACT: During 1986, the City Council adopted 'Ordinance 290
regardlng regulation of entertainment uses. The Ordinance requires
that establishments which provide entertainment must obtain an
Entertainment Permit from the City. The applicant is requesting
review and approval of an Entertainment Permit for a disc jockey,
live bands, comedy acts and dancing.
II. ANALYSIS: The Club Hi -Brow is intended to be a nightclub featuring
en era nment, food, and alcoholic beverages. Entertainment for
customers of the Club Hi -Brow is to be provided by a disc jockey
playing records; live bands. and comedians for the enjoyment,
listening pleasure and/or dancing of patrons. Entertainment is
proposed to be conducted from 8:00 p.m. to 1 :30 a.m., seven (7)
nights a week with an undetermined admission fee to be charged to
patrons.
Ted Lach will be the manager of the Club Hi -Brow and would be
responsible for the management of any entertainment. In acco,,*nce
with Section 5.12.040 of the Entertainment Ordinance, the app: 'giant
has indicated that neither the applicant nor any pr_- �
responsible for the management or supervision of the Club Hi =,
has, w?"hin the previous ten years, been convicted of a crime, n,,
has the applicant ever had any permit or license issued iri
conjunction with the sale of alcohol or provision of entertainment
revoked at this establishment.
Section 5.12.130 of the Entertainment Ordinance requires that a
duly licensed and uniformed security guard shall be in attendance
at all times where dancing is permitted or allowed if the dance
area is in excess of 150 square Feet. The dance floor in the Club
Hi -Brow is approximately 706 square feet in size. Therefore, staff
would recommend a condition of approval to provide a security guard .
for the enter *ainment permit.
ITEM L
1 15
_ PLANNTN TS4. 2 tEPORT
ENTrd;, fiT FT ¢ . ACH
Octrer
;.
Page 2 ,
t'
r
III. FACTS FOR FINE?IWS' The Club Hi-Brow and associated entertainment
wou a cony mod' in a safe and orderly manner. Further, the
applicant has stated that neither- the applicant nor any other
u person associated with the manag"ent or supervision of the Club
Hi -Brow have not beet( corrviti red of any offense involving the
presentation, exhfbiti.oa or perfo -`ce of any obscene show, of any
kind or of a felony or any, cri involving moral turpitude or has
had arw approval permit or licen a issued in conJunction with the
sale of alcohol or t�ie prevision of entertainment revoked within
the precedfilq five -At) years. Approval of this Entertainment
Permit would_i;not create a public nuisance or interfere with tke
peace and quiet of the su�roundinj businesses or residences., To
-,` the best staff's knowledge, the Applicant has not made any false,
misleading or fraudulent statements of material fact on the
^ required applicatio.t.
f VI. RECON14ENDATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Corsi ission
"
conditio naTiy approve an Entertainment Permit for the Club Ili -Brow
through adoption of thq.attached Resolution of /approval,,
f, Resp lly submitted,
E �
I B
GB:DC.ko --
Attachmentr"- Application
Exhibit "A' - Location Map V
Exhibit "O" - -Floor Plan
Resolution of Approval
1--. -*
Clty of (Rancho
FART 1
U loom
tJCain�n�a
Appilcati ®n
P!{ !
s
L0CATl(ii l F pROJECT (AbDRE 33) � �t j'Jr� RELATED
OP PROPOSED PR0.IECT
r/ FILE$
�NAME
.
APPLICTSrN�AME
iELEPNONE
ri
��`�_/
ADORE9S
0
°V
/!�
Y
�y��aG�
sl+litsi'1t•6i..
..s3csa � -
z
OWNER'S E
'
/F I C.i
ri
%LEPNONE
�.
ADDR 7' f
y�IL�
t,
DEVE. DISTRICT GENERAL PLAN U1!`z E S{7E ACREAGE
: EJ GSTINGS7AUC7t/AES�+iIAAEFOOTAQE
PRDP06EDSTRUMMESQUAREFODTAI'tE '—
J CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT*
❑ TECH" UD1;01,i : REVIEW —
❑ 0C:4DiT }'iNAI. USE PERMIT --
COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL'
ISION CONSTRUCTIOP&
❑ TECHNICAUDESIGN REVIEW —
LJ DEVELOPMENT' DISTRICT AMENDMENT
RESIDENTIAL*
..�
(ZONE CHANGE)
❑ TOTAL DEVELOPMENT
LLJ
❑ GENERAL PL41 AMENDMENT
❑ BASIC STANDARDS
Lu
G KJNOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
❑ OPTIONAL STANDARDS
®
❑ MINOR EXCEPTION
0 CUSTOM LOT /SUBDIVISION
>,
13 PRELIMINAR: REVIEW*
Ott
❑ DESIGN REVIEW
ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT
f—
Ia R+aat!dsCa to com Part I& 3101ftWUn ltorm kntlon
pt
�:� i•�
�t FULLDESCAIPTiOHOFPAD9WE- 0PFMJECT(ATTAC ADDITIONAL S}tEE131fHECES9A
"'j
J r 1LsV'r si :w..y�, µ' ! /fit C d'f- Yj ♦ J t
Ld
t /rt GC+JP
G-5
� TY�tii r /�
LL
0
O WNEW OE
LU
I CERTIFY THAT . AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY.
FURI'}IER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF
THIS APPLICATION
ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE,
AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE
AGENT OF O NER -UST ATTACH A SETTER Or-
AUTHORIZAT15N PROM THE LEGAL OWNER,
�
g SIGNATURE:
LZDATE
ULLjI
PRtNTNAMEt4 T �,TE
�'� L�3c.� f-�2S1�✓..�
9a7E RECD flECEi"yED
j
F1 EIVED /ggTT ?
RE
�
R
ray -?A-7 W0041 ca-
)" ( 0 r
?'E'er
/r4,3 40- s-t_ . .�••o� -se
O.�-� �., �r.s c .,. c..c,�; is c.�..•� ,tc
t �'-- -r •�... -f'— ' f
�� fI j.1"k fr s�Jj? /Z u J i e jr
lrrs P •/" / a /di "t 92
Ty % ,jf
�/
14 t sr rev ire l ..-�
f.t. �',r IAV r/dr", s4 p `e a ajf �..
/ ��� �G /M/ +j" K +►,I�+� �,sis d f� J'� C !y �J /� f� +kr� �dfi`�r�i �r \1
f7 ! J O rl
t, � /fj �' � o ��rr �C ;i�'f a r� 9`. .✓ .ia .ra- +r�".7�.,� , . ,:
47 ' +�r r �^ °°" ,t
Ile c er.•• •�r ..� rr► fr r� ccws7 ^-
a
t�✓ rr rc r s +fir .. ,,�. ,,�,,.�, „�
/ ►'' � ,� yr 1�.r!'r -,� � t.W's+r..it«yr� ���! rr
s4 x
1
1
Ala
1.91 AC
..x
4
3.65 4C
` 44
o
Vi Ot
i +Mk
I
Iwwke'f
33jf4 $,fi`-
'=
c
-= S 1/¢ CDR. SEC. 2 _�____. _ �LS. ! INE�. ^a.l4 i ••
T IS, R. tw. 1
-^ :vo�Tx
CITY O iTTM
RAMIO CtEAMONUA
�o
t � 0
1( 1
n
� s
J
c =� I
_Q
6
i s
Sl
hit
se
IL
n.. .. 1 f r,...:..
G
0
.r
1 1
RESOLD' "ON NO.
A RESOLUTION OF.;ME RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING commissrON
APPROVING ENTERtAINMEXT PERMIT" 87 -02, ±FOR DISC JOCKEY,
LIVE BANDS ANO. COMEDY ACTS FOR,'THE CLUB HI -BROW LOCATED
AT 10134 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
A. Recitals.
(ii Ted Lach has filed an application for tie issuance of
Entertainmevt Permit No. 57.02 as described in the title of this Resolation.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Entertainment Permit request is
referred to as "the application ".
(ii) n the 14th of Ocl.:ober, 1987, the Nanning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a rl- -1y noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequi;ites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby 'round, determined � resolved by t.le
Planwing Commission of tke City of Rancho Cucamonga as f� :
1. This- 1.'4xVission hereby spc- cifically fit ..„ all of the fads
set forth in tyF,,z a ?tals, Fart A, cf this Re3c�utionLare true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidelce presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced public ate?: -ing on October 14„ 1587, including
writter and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hzieby specifically finds as follows:
(a) Toe b, all' tio,t ,pplies to property located at 10134
Foothill Boulevard and is presently ,3'� aved with structures and parking areas
w �i ch constitutes the uro:)osed C1 uU 13 -Brow; and
(b) Thk property to the north of the subject site is vacant.,
the property to the south of thit site,consssts of the Michael J's R:staurant,
u�rice and preschool, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to
the wzst is a Circle K hlpkrke°: and Motel; and
') The subject properly was formerl,` operated as the
Pepper.int F� *;pniant which irmludaZ er'tertainaent; and
fair- has a dance floor area of approximatel;> 7G6
square feet; an,'_, .
(d) 1 entertainment, as conditioned, hereby
complies with City of Raff66 !.,,_ .Aga Code requirements.
a
0
(b) All pe►-tons conducting a public dance or any
entertainment where dancing by patrons or
customers is permitted, shall have in
attendance at the preNises `.or the purpose of
supervising the dancing ape the conduct�of all
pat-ops and custok.ies, a My licanslid aid
ur* , 'Vormed security, guard at all times such
4Ancinq is permitted or al l x ell. However, the
provisions of this condition rAall apply onl'
where a dance floor :)r danc2 area in exce s 6�
one hundred fifty square feet is available or
desip,patad for 1?-,ncing by customers or patrors.
11
PLANNING COMMISSION R ESOLUTION NO.
ENTERTAINMEtIT PERMIT V-02 - LACH
October 14, 1987
Page 2
NOW,
3. ! ased upon the substantial evidence prEsented to this Colk-531on
du'ring-Ihe ab64e—referenced public hearing and upon e specific findiip of
facts. set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this 6mission hgreby finds and
concl::jcs as follows:
(1.) , That V` e conduct' of the establishms.i1t or
grantfng of the application ,would not be
contrary to the public health, safety, Liarals
or welfare; and
(bJ That :,the prftllsles or est.nblishment are `,'sot
likely to be operated in oi illegal, impr!3per
or disorderly manner; and
III
(c) That the, applicant has'not had apy, approval,
permit 6.,, license issued in conjunction with
the s.-tie f alcohol or the provision of
.
entertainment revoked within Use preceding ilive
years; r.nd
(d) That granting the application ;could not create
a public nuisance, and
(a) 7bat the normal ordratlon oU,(he premise; would
not interfere W-fth the peace ,and quiet zf any
surrounding rtsidentlal neigh86rhood; and
if) The eppliciint has ni)t mae-i- any fil se,
misleading or fraudulent statement of Aaterial
fact in-the required application.
4. Based upon the findings and coneiusions sot forth in paragrar,'a
1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to
each and ever.; condition set forth bslow:
(a) Expansion of the dance floor area or increase
in the scale or intensity of entertainment
shall reqvira application for modification of
this permit.
(b) All pe►-tons conducting a public dance or any
entertainment where dancing by patrons or
customers is permitted, shall have in
attendance at the preNises `.or the purpose of
supervising the dancing ape the conduct�of all
pat-ops and custok.ies, a My licanslid aid
ur* , 'Vormed security, guard at all times such
4Ancinq is permitted or al l x ell. However, the
provisions of this condition rAall apply onl'
where a dance floor :)r danc2 area in exce s 6�
one hundred fifty square feet is available or
desip,patad for 1?-,ncing by customers or patrors.
11
s
mw we.
PL Iht 't0 C0 1I5S"IO a UTUR tom.
Ef ftk iINMEENT PEWii b7; 02 A LACH
October 14, 1981
P"e 3
b. The Deputy Secretary to this Ciimission shall cerf- .'fy,to the ,
adoption of this Resolution,.
APPRO"ED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER; 1987.
�I PLANNING C"IiS1011 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA4046A
i
BY:
Larry T. 14011el, Chairman
ATTEST;
' Brad u er, a ut ecre ar
p y Y
r I, Brad Buller, Deputy' Secretary of the Planning COmission of the CiPy of
Rancho Cucam iga, do .hereby certify that the foregoing *Iesolution i4as duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comiss�on :of the!'!
City Qf Rancho Cummonga, At a regular meeting of the Planning Comission field
on the 14th day of October, 1987, by the fo'111owing vote -to -wit:
COMMISSIONERS:
v
VMS: Cc3MMISSMNERS:
i
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; ,
l
)i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MO'NGA
STAFF REPORT
October 14, 1987;
Chairman, app Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Bq'iler, City Planner
Nancy Fong, Associate Planner
trucking firm rnd caretake'r`s quarters
building acres of land in the Gi
District, Subarea 8, located at' 8604 Pei
of Arrow Highway - APR 229 - 141 -08 and 229
TRUCKING - A
ppr °oWST —for a
an existing
al Industrial
Avenue, south
1 -24 and 26..
I. ASSMACT ne p _ rise of this report is to inform the Planning
o1miss an on the status of the project in regards to its
compliance with the conditions of approval.
II. BACKGROUND: On August 14, 1985, the Planning Commission
conditionally approved thti5 ,project allowing the applicant to
operate a trucking firm, outwor storage' and retail of building
materials such as rock, sand and decorativ;i rock and a caretaker
quarters in the existing building. One of the conditions cfr
approval requires Planning Commission review of this project for
compliance with the conditions of approval two years from the
approval date. XI -ached for yovir review is Resolution No. 85 -1Z7
listing the conditions of approval for this projecj;.
III. ANAL`tSIS:
A. Review of Compliance with Conditions of Approval: Staff
inspected e s. e, on SeptemDer t, ano o -T "that the
applicant has not complied with all of the conditions of
approval for this project. The following lists those items
that have been completed and those that are still outstanding
(pictures will be available for your review at the meeting):
Planning Y. pis ton
1. A precast concrete wall has been installed around
the perimeter of the site, whereas conditions
required stucco material.
2. The two security gates along Pecan Avenue and the
one across the unimproved Valencia Avenue have
not been installed.
ITEM M
PLANNING CO4ISSION STW, REPORT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-28 HUMP.HREY
October 14, 1987
Page 2
3. A building permit for the mansard -oof at the
office/ caretaker's quarters to screen the roof
equipment has not been obtained. Arcording to
the Building and Safety Division, there are
several minor corrections needed prior to
issuance of a building permit.
4. The block all and landscaping aiLng Pecan Avenue
have been completed, but the security gates have
not been installed.
S. The blae.t well along the easterly property
boundary has been completed, but tl�.security has
not been installed.
6. The driveway has been removed.
Lngincering Division
1. The lot line ad ustmPnt has been recorded.
2. 'fife ,irainage easament has been recorded.
3. The cost of remodeling the existing building is
less than 50 percent of the value of the
building.
Tr addition to the above items, the applicant has not complied
,th tvo of the standard conditions that require the
in =tall ation of a trash enclesure area, and a paved driveway
aisle within the I+arking irea.
Although the uiTl� cant has rot complied with all of the
conditions of aaproval, he stated that he would continue to
work towards completing these outstanding items. It is
recommended that the Planning Commission direct staff to work
with the applicant in ensuring that he completes all of the
listed cutstanding items it a timely fashion.
B. Truck Traffic Ktong Valencia Avenue; Staff has received
ccmpTa ro s rosin residen s on a enc a Avenue regarding the
excessive truck traffic along this unimproved street. Valencia
Avenue is rot c fully improved public street. It is a dirt
driveway that serves as access for the residentF. The property
owners have offered dediSation of land for future
improvement. At the time of the initial review, the applicant
stated that this southern parcel only for truck narking area
and there are no plans for any;ruture development. Valencia
Avenue b°insL. - -an unimproved public street is not deg yned to
handle any semi -truck tra ffic. riff 'has informed the
applicant not to use Valen ^i;. Avenue vor any truck traffic and
this matter has been referred to the code Enforceient division
}
CDNt1ITI0NAL U6E 8L =T +ttitPHREY
t?ctober 24, 1987
!age
fov -Will itori:,g of Pomptidncp.,,, If the`\ applicant decides to
continue using th;,j upiaiproxP4' street for ino�sss and egress
for his trucks,,. =�ale!&i,a ��tt tue should be fully i rov4d as a
public street: This would require a awdif3catiak; t.o tip
C001tional Use $cram where a public hearing shoule be set for
adG►n conditions of approval for street improvements on
Valencia Avepue
RECf NDATION: Staf;' . r
:--_� ecagmends that the Punning Cci�vissian
di Fecr suff work 41th the applicant in ensuri. -ig that +ne will
complete all outstanding items -in a timely fashifir%:
-Aes full ubmitted,,
Bra filer
City lanner
BB:NF:te
Attachments; Resolution Wa ` Ba =LI7
Erhibft W Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization
Exhibit - -1C" - Detailed Sits Ptah
r, ' Ext. >b;t "D" Elevations a
RESOLUTION NO. 185 -117
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANK CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING COND tIONAL USE PERMIT NO: 84 -28 FOR A TRUCKING
SERVICE, RETAIL AND OUTDOOR STORAGE OF BUILDING MATERIALS.
I_. AND A CARETAKER QUARTERS LOCATED AT 8504 PECAN AVENUE,
SOUTH OF ARROW HIGHWAY IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on the 13th day of March, 1985, a complete application was
filed by Dale Humphrey Trucking for review of the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 14th day of August, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described
project. _
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
SECTIOu ': .hat the following �inding� can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and
the purposes of the district in which the site is
locatad.
\ 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the proposed use crmplies, with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code..
SECTION 2. That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment acid that a Negative Declaration is issued ota August 14, 1985.
SECTION 3 That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -28 Is approved
subject to the following conditions:
Planning Div °pion:
�. 1- All block wal"M shall be of stucco material
2. Any security gate. shall be of decorative view-
, obst•ucting metal material. Detail plans shall be
submitted for CiV, Mnner rayiew and approval prior
to issuance of. any permits.
I/, �vl-q
PLANNING•COMMISSION RESOLUTION
Fp§ CUP 84 -28
August: t4, 1985
Page 2
J
Encineer,ng Division
1. A Lot Line Adjustmelt to combine the 2 northerly
existing parcels infj I shall be completed within
six (6) months from the approval date.
2. A Crainage Easement for Etiwanda Creek shall be
provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
within six (6) months from the approval date.
3. If the _ost of she remodeling of the existing
building exceeds 50% of the value of the building at
present, a Fired Hazard Report and flood protection
measur:_ will be required.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1985.
PLA#Itrf'4COMMISSION F THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, C airman
ATTEST
Lauren
3.
The office /caretaker quarters -sbali be upgraded to a
business use thj•ough modifying the roof by adding
n
On
mansard to screen the roof equipment and enhancing
the
the architectural appearance. Retail plans shall be
DO
for Design Review Committee revi w and
approval prior to issuance of any permit and shall
be completed witi.in a six (6) month period.
4.
The block wall landscaping and security gates along
Pecan Avenue shall be completed within a six- (6)
month period.
S.
The block wall and the security gate along the
`
easterly, property boundary across from Vale%eia
Avenue shall be completed within a two -year period
from the approval date.
6.
The existinn driveway for the converted residence
shall be •remjved.
7.
'This Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed uy the
Planning Commission for compliance with the
Conditions of Approval two years from the approval
date.
8.
If any o= the conditions contained herein are not
adhered to, this approval shall be deemed
automatically revoked.
Encineer,ng Division
1. A Lot Line Adjustmelt to combine the 2 northerly
existing parcels infj I shall be completed within
six (6) months from the approval date.
2. A Crainage Easement for Etiwanda Creek shall be
provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
within six (6) months from the approval date.
3. If the _ost of she remodeling of the existing
building exceeds 50% of the value of the building at
present, a Fired Hazard Report and flood protection
measur:_ will be required.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1985.
PLA#Itrf'4COMMISSION F THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, C airman
ATTEST
Lauren
ALil9IFfiTHG C0t�8 rssiom RESOLUTION
i CUP 84 -28
August 14, 1985
Page 3 \ ,
t
I, Lauren M. Wasserman, Acting Secretary of the Planning tj=Ms'Sion i)f the
Gity of Ranch$ Cu Zwnga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Rc olution was
!r`
duly and regularly introduced, passed, ano adopted by the Planning Commission
Of the City or Rancho Cu Ponga, at a regular Ming of the Plam�ing
Canmi sion help, on the 14th , ,,s of August, 1986 by the followinc,' vote -to it:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL. MCNiEL, CHITIEA, STOUT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS BARKER
P' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: °NONE
y � +
ea
MIT Now,
site e � e e
cr of ><
y A �•..a
Tm-
SING UVEM, ExRwr_. _ .emu..
`F-41
y�
J
{
24Z
I
'
in
,,. `
�•-y
•
`w r' �
p t t. 441
i
_ ....
�
r
f•.. •; ,
wk
, Bpi K
�
��..•
..
! s s mss:. :.e-
or
!I
J j
site e � e e
cr of ><
y A �•..a
Tm-
SING UVEM, ExRwr_. _ .emu..
•r '`� � x i ' � ` 4` 14
t. •sai `.a !"�h c r` ,_`...J "t -1—�. wi fat,
d� �M'` ��� "ti .!s �� ,,..'Cyr" ! ,r''� ,.. i'. � t �I�• u, _ _ ,
"7.
.14 avi
s �• s ' Z L
}}
f �1't x•. � ! `wail IM'
Detailed
i
�NORTH
crry OF MEM, SO
CUCAMONGA�
.A SCAU, =
rte,
MY_ CF
e
PLANNING U Veit ' N
4
i
IM
0701 -02 010 -14 -87 PC Agenda , 4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 14, 1987
TO: Chairman an;' Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: TRACT 10046 EQUESTRIAN TRAILS - MORROW - A request to
e e e a portion o a oca eques r an trail easement
within a previously approved tract consisting of 27 single
family lots within the Very Low Residential District (less
than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side
of Hillside Road, west of Hermosa Avenue.
I. BACKGROUND: On D°:- cember 5, 1984, the Planning Commission approved
Tentativ e ract 10046 (see Exhibit "A "). As part of the approval,
equestrian trails were required within the subdivssion, a community
equestrian trail was required along Hillside Road and local
equestrian trails were required throughout the development
including the west and north !;.�riraeters and ranning north -south
through the central portion of �*"� tract.
With the development of the sate, the local trail easement at the
southwest portion of the trr °s war, located at the top of a slope
along the south side of Lots ; 7 are . in order to provide drainage
and a smooth trail connectie:. ?:rt to Hillside Road (see Exhibit
"B "). The Slope embankment :below the trail was used to take up
grade rather than a high retain.ng waO at the property line. By
designing the trail in this fashion, a large portion of the rear
yards of these two lots have been devoted to slopes and the
equestrian trail. Rather than having the usual fifteen foot
equestrian trail adjacent to the rear property line, the trail and
slopes occupy up to 33 feet of the rear yards of Lots 2 dnd 3.
This has substantially reduced the usabili'y of these two lots and
makes horse keeping impractical.
A local equestrian ` crail was also required along the west side of
Lots 3 and 4 adjacent to the Alta Loma Channel and the San
Bernardino County Flood Control District's service road. The trail
was developed to the usual trail standards providing a 15 foot wide
local trail easement. With the placement of the unit on Lot 4, the
rear of the residence is located rougLly 16 feet from the
equestrian trail. As a result, walkers and horseback riders can
look directly into the dining ijrea of the residents, theroby
depriving the resi {gents "of substantial privacy. It also restricts
the usability of the rear yard area and pushes the residents to the
far northern or souther�i portions of the lot.
ITEM f%
~ PLANkING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TRACT 10046 EQU at`2IAN TRAILS - MARROW
October 14, 1987
Page 2
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The „property owners of Lots 2, 3 and 4 are requesting
the local equestrian trail easement be eliminated on the
south side off Lots 2 and 3 and west side ",of I.,ots 3 and 4. This
would allow the residents to re -gain ortfgns of their rear
yards making them usable for their families.
B. Trafl s Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee has
mel —with at a - residents UT-the tract on several occasions, the
most recent baing on September 19, 1987. At that time, the
Committee received input on the proposed deletion of this
section of the equestrian trail. The Committee stated that the
elimination of the trail would, still allow trail access for
Lots 2 and 4. The Committee, however, expressed concern that
the elimination of the equestrian trail from Lots 2 through 4
would not provide Lot 3 with access to an equestrian trail as
required by the Development Code and General Plan. The
Committee stated that the City was in the process of
negotiating., with the San Bernardino County Flood Control
District t1- use the service road of the Alta Loma Channel as a
coftlinity equestrian trail. If this joint use was approved,
Lot � would then have access tc an equestrian and would still
be in conformance with the intent of the General Plan and
Development Code. Therefore, the Committee recommended that
the trail could be eliminated on the south side of Lots 2 and 3
and on the west side of Lots 3 and 4 if the necessary
agretwents c;9uld be worked out with the San Bernardino County
Flood Control Distric..
In the event-In agreement could not be reached with the Fiool
Control District, the Committee suggested that the grading on
Lots 2 and 3 could be redesigned to provide more usable. rear
yarn' area ank that the equestrian trail could be realigned -
closer to the rear property lines,
C. Procedures to Eliminate the Trail: In order to eliminate the
trall from the su v s on map, he applicant must folldw a
series a stems leading to the trail's ultimate deletion. The
first step is for the Planning Commission to consider the
proposal and make a recommendation on whether- or -not the trair
should be eliminated. This recommendation would then be
forwarded to the City Council for their consideration. The
City Council would adopt a Resolution approving the vacation of
the easement. Finally, the residents requesting the trail
deletion must then receive approval from 100E of the property
owners within the tract. Only after such approval is obtained
can the property owners modify the map to eliminate the local
equestrian easement.
1v- aL
October 141* >OItCsQ�t �•�
Page 3
w III.;RECOMM€WATIi)N-: Staff recommends that the Planning commissiog
a ns er a "Public input and testimony on the proposed tn- -(`
deletion. If', after receiving all input, the Planning Cmipt '
feels that thp� deletion of the trail is appropriate, staff woo
recommend that tj�i Planning Commission forward a recommendation of
approval to the 'Ay council.
Reqvofully submitted,
L
Bra u
city P anner
BB:SM:ko
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Tract Clap
�. Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site plan of Lots 2, 3 and 4
I
y Amt 28 , 1987
Z%t79' OF RAN
IONG
SEP 02
114"t V t
y
D= Csleman '
Senior Planner
COM )RIT`1' DE6i.Si,�PJI� YT DEPARTTJM +
PLAMING DIVISXON.
City of Rar.chd Cucamonga y. x
9320 Baseline /Ad.`
Rancho Cucamonga, 'Ca. 91730,
*v ,- Dear Mr. ColGMan,
We respectfully request that you consider, at the next,
meeting of the Trails A4",i®or7 Committee, • a proposal . •
brought forth in private diecueiions conoerning realig4ment °� 4-.
of an eque ,.eian trail pertaining to Tract #10046. j
And, as a >tter of fact, it would remove a. major concern
of property - owners if the entire trail,f:^om lots #1 through S:
#13 was realigned. - Rs
�. This natter .i.s of
4 -1 L . ' and could be solved without disco tin ise propertry..ownersp�
for the trails system.
PS theigiaeti •intend
r w We would be glad to attend the meeting to discuss .aur
concerns in more detail. • >
Thank you once again.. ;
Stu rely, y
Sharon L:orrl•tow'
9919 Baytree Cta F_
Rancho Cucamonga,' a. 91701 _>
980 -8253
4
ire
CITY ITEM, M "!
9
dp
a ZY< ss FL 5F4
i s:�`ss, _ J •h� 6F,�$y� � -15th.
FAA
7 Or
Alz
lie
N-6 o#r
AVm4oV-
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDI4G APPROVAL. OF A REQUEST TO VICATE A PORTION OF
A LOCAL EQUESTRIAN TRAIL EASEMENT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
`'TOE OF LOTS A AND 3 AND ON THE NEST SIDE OF LOTS 3 AND 4
WITHIN TRACT 10046, A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT
CONSISTING OF 27 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS WITHIN THE VERY LOW
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
HILLSIDE ROAD, ;;,,?ST OF HERMOSA AVENUE
A. Recitals.
(i) Sharon Morrow, on behalf of herself and the property owners of
Lots 2 aid 4, has filed an application requesting the vacation of a portion of
a local equestrian trail easement as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the v- equest shall be referred to
as °The Application ".
(ii) On October 4, 1987, the Planning commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date.
(Iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
D. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon. substantial evidence presented to this Crxrxmission
during the above - referenced hearing on October 14, 1987, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follr..,s:
(a) The application applies to the local equestrian trail
easement located on the south side of Lots 2 art 3 and on the west side of
Lots 3 and 4.
residences. (b) Lots 2, 3 and 4 are developed with single family
(c) The property to the south Is designated for residential
uses and is developed with a single family residence. The property to the
west is designated for flood control purposes and is developed with the Alta
Affih JV Loma channel and is also designated on the General plan Master Plan of Trails
for a future community trail.
V� /
n ¢. 7, 777,
PLANNING COMISS, -69 RESQLU'fIOY,No. _
RE: Tit 10045 EQUESTRAIAN TRAIL
( rL'ober 14, 1987
Page 2
tr,rdl significantly r duces the usab esr rear yardnareas of f0ii lots l s andelimits
the ability to keep horses.
(e) The placement of the units on the lots in relationship to
the equestrian Vail substantially reduces the privacy within tP4e units and
tie rear yards.
(f) With the recommended conditions of approval, the lots will
still have access to equestrian tral, thereby maintaining compliance with the
objectives of the Equestrian Overlay District and the General Plan.
(g) Supplies necessary for the keeping of horses can 3tiii be
delivered through the front and side yard areas of the lots.
(h) With the recommended conditions of approval, a continuous
equestrian trail loop will be maintained.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presentc-d to this Commission
during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows;
(a) That the local equestrian trail easement vacation and the
requirement. tar a community equestrian trail is consistent with the General
Plan and Development Code; and
environmental damage and av avoidable injury to toohms likely d to cause wildlife substantial
their
habitat; and
(c) The tentative tract trail vacation is not likely to cause
serious public health problems.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby i-;;`ommends that the City Council
ands in the application Standardt C to each onditions and attached heretoonandt incorporated
herein by this reference.
(a) Prior to final vacation of the equestrian trail,
agreements shall be obtained with the San Bernardino County Flood Control
District to provide a community equestrian trail within the existing service
road.
(b) A 100% vote of approval from the homeowners within the
tract shall be obtained prior to final vacation of the equestrian trail
easement. Verification of such approval shall be submitted to the City
Planner.
r
R
R
�r
4
ELAgl .r Al QN NQ.
RE. 1# 1tF . E R. OIL
Octo4er 14, 1587' !t
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1987.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY �
arry T. McKie], ChalrMan
r
ATTEST:
BraH ouller. Deputy secretary
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 14th day of October, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONEkS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
J <<
C%
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT::
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
�I
October 14, 19(
Chainkn and limbers of th ,:- planning Commission
Brad Buller, C.ty Planner
Chris kestman, Assistant Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEMr -AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -44 -
to construct a - , on 1.
square oo ant.T"ilding on 1.6
acres of land in the Industrial Park District, Haven
'venue Overlay District, located on the southeast corner
of Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive - APN: 208 - 522 -36.
L PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A.
Anticn Requested: Approval of site plan and elevations and the_
Issuance of a egative Declaration.
B.
Surroun�ing Land Use an& Zonin :
no = ratan , u area t n ustrial Park)
South - Office, Subarea 7 (Industrial Park)
East - Of ict, Subarea 7 (Industrial Park)
West - VaOnt, Subarea 7 (Industrial Park)
C.
General Plan Designations:
rP djec£`;,lte - Inru s r a ark
North - Industrial Park
South - Industrial Park
East - Industrial Park
West - Industrial Park
D.
Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with
n&'-significant
vegetation. it is on a prominent turner directty south of tFe
future city hall property. To the east is an existing office
building. Sidewalks and parkway landscaping are existing on
Haven and Civic CL-nter Drive.
E.
_Parking Calculations:
Number of
Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces
Spaces
of Use Footage Ratio Required
Provided
Bank 19,824(net) 1j?5D 79
90
ITEM 0
PLI4N ` '-CQUOttT
` DR 87 -44 - Ini r tst ate F +nai►�fil Development
October 14, 1987
Page 2
TI. ANALYSIS:
A.' General; The project is in confo dance with the industrial
pec c Plan and the provisions J'� the Haven Avenue Overlay
District. This type Af use is con lstent with surrounding uses
and the zoning district in ahic4 it is located. the project
has been reviewed by th
Committees. JI e /�pesign and Technical Review
B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Blakesley, Kroutil,
cfii�tiea ) re ewe a project on September 17, 1987 and
discusptd the compatibility of the building design and
materials with the Civic Center which is proposed directly
north. The Committee then forwarded the pro�iect to the
finning Commission with the following recommendations:
I. The Planning Commission should evaluate the northwest
corner of the building on how it relates to the street
corner and impacts the over -alt design of the Civic Center
and the Civic Center Drive streetscape.
2. The applicant should work with staff in developing the
pedestrian- oriented space which links the proposed
bvi1ding to the existing easterly building. The detailed
design of the pedestrian walkway and landscaping between
the proposed project and the easterly existing office
buildings should be submitted for City Planner review and
approval.
3. Methods of roof screening should be reviewed by the Design
Review Commit*`.ee prior to building permit issuance.
4. An appropriate 'infill of specimen size trees and shrub
cissing along Haven should be provided which will screen
the parking area.
5. The sculptural element should be visible from Haven
Avenue.
6. The :,pplicant should explore other options for the
material used at the foundation of the building.
0"'�9_
0
C
nit
pR 87- f:,#aie financial Development
Qctober 14,1,1-)19 , 87
Page 3
C. _technical Review Committee:
7. The exis�,ing overhead utilities (communi "ion and
\ electrical, Axcept for the 66kv electrical) on the project
side of Haven Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first
pole on the north side of Civic Center Drive to the first
pele off -site south of the projtvtls south boundary,; prior
tolpublic improvement acceptance „or,occupancy, whichever
occurs first. The developer mat, request a reimbursement
agreement to receive one -half the dilfference between the
r,
unditr9rounding cost of the utilities (electrical) on the,
project side of the street minus those (telecommunicatT��s)J
on the opposite side of the street frog; 'Uturz development
as it occurs on the opposite side of the street.
?. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and :I of the Initial Study
can comp e e an no significant impacts have been found
related to the co>,struction of the proposed building,
l;
III. FATS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is consistent with General
an an e industrial Specific Plan, The building design and
site plan together with recc4mnded conditions of approval, ail"Jn
compliance with the Industrial Specific Plan, and all other
applicable City Standards.
IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve eveiopment Review 87 -44 and issue a Negative Declaration
through adoption of the attached Resolution _of approval with
conditions.
Respectfully submitted,
.-.
GCitPl 1 .. . y anner
BB: CWcvc
Attachments: Exhibit "A” - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Elevations
Exhibit "D" — Conceptual Landscape Plan
Resolution of Approval
ir(
l
FW-)GY-
ZIP CODS 91730 ii
Blvd.
Tt
it
c It
IF
>1
Trru-
EXHUr,- SCAM 11.4c,
w
Em
s", "ll"I'lleav-
-Ilk *gyp
r y
ow
IPMPW,"
GRO%fs
W
>
PARK
C7
,
t
tl
F.6o ILL
21
It 66 BLVD.
>
a
2t= al
& AMTICE CENTER
SAARRMOMMAZA
COCAAHWiGA
0
-4
z
uj
>
nt r
FW-)GY-
ZIP CODS 91730 ii
Blvd.
Tt
it
c It
IF
>1
Trru-
EXHUr,- SCAM 11.4c,
w
Em
*K
I�
c)
G�
;'dORTH
CITY OF rcpt= rX 97-14
PLANNM DIVISt��+t
EXHiB[T SCAL.E: N�
aw
k,
or
N4 A L
qmllf 11
�
4MZV4!r
MP
r_ - ,. 0
fl
CITY CF 0 7
rrEm:
RATICM CLEkMMA
FL
ANNM DrVNUN
` RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF 7HE MCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO, 8: -44, A 21,000 SQUARE
FOOT BARK ON 1.5 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND HArti AVENUE' IN THE
HAVEN AVENUE MERL;, DISTRICT - APN: 208- 622 -36
A. Recitals.
{i} Intrastate financial Development Corporation has filed an
apptication for the approval of Development Review No X87 - -44 as described in
the title of this Resolution. 3ereir -4ter in tr"! Resolution, the subject
Development Review request is referred to as "the application`.
(ii) Cn tha of 14th of October, 1987, the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted b meeti:vg on the application and
concluded said meeting on- ,that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption cf this Resolution
have occurred.
/ B. Resolution.,
`i NOV, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the C-ty of Rancho Cucamonga as follnws
F 1. This 07 mission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, 'Part A, of this Resolution are true and,correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above- referenced public hearing on October 14, 1967, including
written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as
follows.
(a) The application appliey to property located on thb
southeast corner of Civic Center Drive and Haven Avenue in the Haven Avenue
Overlay District.
(b) The architecture and site plan meet the design criteria
established for that district.
(c) The materials and architecture are compatible with the
proposed Civic Center to the north.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during tFe above - referenced ,netting and upon the specific findings of facts
set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
40 (a) That the proposed project is consistent with
the obJectives of the General Plan, and
PLANNING COMmisnowkWMON NO.
DR 07-44 - Intrastate Financial Development
October 14, 2907
Page 2
(b) That the proposed use is in accord with the
objective of the Development Code and the
Purposes of the district in which the site is
located; and
tc) That the proposed use is in''cosplianca with
Each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code; and
(d) That floe proposed use, together with the
conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety.. or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties
or impravinents in the vicinity:
4. This Crond ssion hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reVewed and :onsidered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality fact of .19; tnd, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
A, $ and S above, this Comission hereby approves the application subject to
e3.r-o and every condition set forth below and in fte attached Standard
Londitions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
plannin - Division
(a) Ve applicant shall develop a pedestrian - oriented space
which links the proposed building to the existing easterly building to the
satisfaction Of the City Planre,��,prior to issuance of building permits.
(b) Methods of roof screening from public, - .,view and from
surrounding office buildings shall be reviewed by the Design Review Comittee
Prior to building permit issuance,
(c) A.n appropriate infili of specimen size / trees and shrub
massing along ,;Haven Avenue 'shall be provided to sufficiently screen the
parking area.
(d) The sculptv-al element -shall be visible from haven Avenue.
L2
7P 777
October -level opment '
y.
Page S
Engineering Aiwision
(a) The existing overhead utilities (comnication an
electrical, except for the 8J% v electrical) on the project side of Haven!'
Avenue shall be undergroundrd from the first pole on the north side of Givic� .
Center Drive to the first,pole off- site'sm,th of the pro1i:ect`s south boundary,
pr.or to public impr•oveftnt acceptance or occupancy, ahlchever �Icurs first.
the developer .may request a rei4birsement agreement to receive_.one -halF'the,
difference betriten the ur►dergrounding cost of the utilities (electrical; on
the project side of the street minus those (telecommunication) on the !,bppP4ite
side of the street from ,ft tura deviTlopment as it gccu
of the street. rs Ott the oppo��"ite -fide
5. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the
adoption of this Resolution.
'( APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1987« '
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONGA 0
by:-
Larry T. Niel, airman
ATTEST:
'Brad Buller, Deputy secretary
I. Brad Buller, deputy Sec6kary of the pls:,ning Coamissian of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereoy (iertify that lice foregoing Resolution was duty ard
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of- tNe
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the planning Commission'}►21d
on the 14th dar,,gf October, 19871 by the following vote -to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: C"ISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
41
{� 3
i
ii Lis M-2 a°)e '> • N °e U!i :i-,4
.,�N'.�oJs•.: Ala - �r +ai
AIDa•+.. u•. ,.. P
VN `�LnR
` NLYyL Y�Y�9 L{Y�Y L i1
•4MV.A' ~LN tl�¢ 14N Gyp �y �C 44
O mow!
'OCI�Y.CS'a 4►. >Tl N4 M CCY C4 YVY .0 P-
--E
/
Yl�Y�pT
'ter
ILO
4. -Z � $:p � 0. !' � 6 w. i1 i,A � � ~ pM N P N C �
lit Y uu •± y Q,w. rV ti, i yii.
Ira:
Let
;
O VxY
p� LZZ,y O YO.r °! i.R` N tr Y_ NCyi3}S.
� r �gt g
S.N.v.end`Ti iwTe� ASA.,. 1u5 <�� 3w .-i.'~ � ^`2�
f Y +3s S su
V
yµY
� N
0`O�Ct��w�NC�Y
NM A O v
z g o c �(u� r ■■°c.". r.:�.rg
w
Zw
a IL
' N J � � � Y � Y q v C � � •� � tps? �
U � � o�
MN lr �; M. �t D
.5M
11
H
E
J\ l y
G.i
av�'Ri. $'ao��'oaic w4Eb.YG�+ Gg • oe.p r°,
C qq .5ft
r y v y
6ggnz d�p q. NONY jw3
fir{
��y0• .W4� M�w�uQfia� .J gd�gN 'wT ■C �Gr bp..
MLd'w rO1�V4 YVVNM. �Ywp ti. VC .�Y "Re
elz
w t L `r1� S qP
9 ��T , �,LO �e GyCV .S C� T Yy LY «tqI SYN 9` e L` �.r Mµ dM �New�T+g�'0 •., lY 2®T� I'■1 w p �L :Vdrn� i 'g .�X�^v y�-
4YQYp �6«p C 9
a Yi 1. €.y -u Sri
C, r G- >t I.
'...t.IN.TwG+.
^ � 9 -z zxz�
9V txl 10 77Y'z; Z
25. MV i o� IQ V_t N 1efs 'L w
N�u & d �i
V L 1j
T Y
`CM Off.
�4y�M-
MIX
ayyl Is i`,g` Y4dsyY Mal Y>MI F � �yyj ®C
w9 Y A M I X �y ty`� S iO�qq �y. � Y V N CE l � � C �� � ^ CVpO � Y � O �
a p6. I'LNV M'•` Nf� «M%JSrYCT Y K�.NNVail Wwr��..0 t�OM� NA.
U
�PTIS Nd dtV CiYN �r cY �1t 4'
� ,p9 Yq,V4b HE tYy'pML YM�Q
i tl ti 6� y d M T L 4 i rw M t«
�«'rt
`TaY VL ro3 hs yDy 6Y Y � +wj YS` e= d 1r Ld cw
�.� �uy ��_3k= V
�1 0
w �� � cNAA�i �C ■�+ wit i ~ §�usT� •a�., ��.i o MOY�y ti
CaG�.. e� 1y�� 60� �br y� �O 4ssssq +���a� eK�Y4.p0� e Vv�9=10
fU� �V'� C d� • C Q� Y w.�V:e dtY *��i1
N O Tw Yw � • Y �Lig �y 01 Y n+a NYC
YA • d YC O�A 4p!d Vy;tQ�d CO~�p
�y C L y LSL LC o 4p ci.
�C�>�1Mtd yL pV�u 4■�v�e �YbxC d �.Y TG�r�Y.0 Y.��p� �W OIw�Y >oL ii )y1y�
�L Oy�GG C�r� r C� N +tY1 w ■� yY� �6 «QW 9p ti�� >pN
'is. ^` •w.r a=e L d'^ rV uG
Eel i. t~i ��TiA�6 �ry+L ALLI rGY gL 0{�u�4YwYy
a. 7-r NO. KEN av iY .JG f+'g'fLY Yi1 -12 Fd�NC� ,M. A °:G R *.
1
N.
.s-
1�
O
V
�O
d
sycxg ttZ� +q�a�av
`Iw�G+I QNy 6C?_y9 M.G CSgp.1 _G}C4Ya
M! R'L1 M3 � q ^IVY G'Y.^�4 ■' .y� R y"Ns
j �a t'4'do fAogMN AL�o
Z.
t 4 y �! wN.B y
�.
` ■ _ p p N y d ^y
M r y. s 4 pN y Y CC yy
N V �y VY y A VN C. ~uwY KI KMM.�T �A UT.µ
c'N Ui -'ir 4d c:.ai Fu'^.aa
Q y � r � � + N i� �y� Ill Y. � NN G O M N V � 0 � ^ AA ' • � M � � N � 4.
Y N
N a ,�j Af AS �' a y
a+S'i tye �' m4 �. i aY.2 -.0 Z{w� s-Z Mme' e+C ��� ■gc
SYp &Y M N r N N y^ L N M .D 01 y 2 g z i 4 i? a j =y
.rnrCC 6 }y pQ a1 Np t
p Yra Lu Va ,y y„� 1A "'6LL�CLpM V 2■ �i Sh t.i'�
fig C . ' Np S � s € ° y « � p � tl ^ Y x g a L
C M U 3. OO•� i„ N M t. �4 N Vj �` N i. A « 4� t • ' M
5A4� yOT � }r Y. �'y+{oy' ��{- 3 ^e �►mM #i`oja���C
°�0��� 3Ya�� wN t�y W!151-f
L�� w L ^� yV 4p6 CT±is
It
� L N ss o��� L _�. �a Q� r+ i O 4 r� C
HYMAN SNP SN 3M0 Hy+ SN U�.r�OGIY ySN YY{u� CYNaa C L{C�
O44 L A 'O GG G 3GO yyt C i CIO i0 Jbyw�
uC �i9. I.0 s6 C N Cam° 9ws Ci.^ $�.L2
7. ,c4 Lw0 V+ nds d..4. Err Y
_ g6 y N ��Sii it M Y 4•Y O
oil
\ • Y�
�� f"t �...�
>N Ca + >af eVi 4y m- n� aar:� op GG wV
G
nY, $' ,f NC 1VN V V C qa 21 U C O.� '7- Yy �n4
G 'am
_ q'G+ _c
q 4.'� yG ay {M� 4 Cy t�•l n 4y]YS 4Y ° ^ tom"p
�'LQ',�^ $ 2
�wt,'
ySA .0 +. +. � �^ �[O� • VY 4Gy'N yN ���N }��Yy�V�L
ya N U. C.CC4 �r.L f >t��R aYy�1 C�Y �4
Q�9Y iCC s 4y MY� V L`� C VSO NM �nW�� 4d�.V1YwL
LO 9Q¢ GG $ _ C ■ �, t T Caw. V
-Y„N,. yy ^per LEE SN ^Y viL� CI$� 'C~ ■rY Na Qp ^YY
4 sy L d w i XF C O�p�! N. N wC a -5 4 Y
O Nyy.� Oyy+f d1 LO.�. Na .aC{C. M� Gyyi wOV Lp �N,y..C. -1,
LGy V C Y L w V, yL RCN �We C YN��^
ny~ L Y'F Y ��^ �T �. SN V � Y 4 N N_S6w ir.: C aV L
w �'� c r ■
%CN ^N ^> YLLa'4 ffi �4�. NLV L
<za0 cLw +�3 :co'3N V C $ z svL Fco .cwL rio s=,i► BEE
0
u
t'7
t
I]
• A qp
f.9
c
rs
��YV��Cwb" yy rN
YON "yw
MY
u � ■cj e x
S W � ri
L � Y C AYYM P CY
q` q i r
i�
'fit
s�
ag! Y
LSE an i_
�t _x y� g3�
M�Y.. l py
�S �'� ^�ari C
A m Salim Pill; H
V h
S
+
His
0V
71!8
E_
WE'
�Cy$�yAt��
pwtirp.�
{m�Yj
O
V
V C
V
ARE
Ov
O1 0
I
Vw+
a%
-all
�w«
p
{`O
•b` N+-
v
k
V
y�
z.'�
vr''E
A'
r.
{J
,_o
L
a f3Bp
b$
'{6CV
YOY
as� d
y
G6
pr 4�
r Gam=
�V1
� ✓
y`VyN
V NL
Y +yyV
C�V
y p
ON��
0� V` !!�
Sit
Y F.2
C wC
«aw
A sr
A -ie
NAS
In
--Z
3
a
€.r$Q5
q4
:i rmoll
A9Nw
c
rs
��YV��Cwb" yy rN
YON "yw
MY
u � ■cj e x
S W � ri
L � Y C AYYM P CY
q` q i r
i�
'fit
s�
ag! Y
LSE an i_
�t _x y� g3�
M�Y.. l py
�S �'� ^�ari C
A m Salim Pill; H
V h
S
+
His
0V
71!8
.i
V u
i s
t'' L
L
qOy�
a--'�
{`O
•b` N+-
v
k
V
y�
IL
D LL
Y
{J
�T
ZILa
MwL
�pO
=�
y
G6
C
OtN�r
r Gam=
�V1
� ✓
y`VyN
V NL
Y +yyV
C�V
V
ON��
��O
q
i �
dL Y
--Z
3
*
gy
�u
a
�
a
nLLLCG
�
yYYyY
Va6.
jrQ
■v$V���g
Y
L
'I
�Y��yL
MV6O
MMdC
y�
+ ^ `
YYC'•'�
y�.4�
�s�CV
a
�GV
��O y=
Oa
O+
YrWy
ii
O�{y�u�yyC
?N
O?$�v!
L6
\�A
a
9N'
�
NN'
g
O
"Y�1O�y
iB OM bA
A
V3d
~ V O
L P w
y C D1
Y GV
N r
OC^VuVu�10
M■ON
L Y C
i
^V
V sQsNY c••
Lw
"CC�piY
N.w
/Y wM
�pY
AG
6
�j A
A
4 M
?
pwLG>
Cp
7
W O M
���111
{{{�jjjp���•
■
a
gCNCi�N
NC4
[q�
L C
GIC
$ u
LQ
/� (
N
yam=
Y A
^ v P
r O r C
C
r" v
VV
CO
G D rO
�
y �1 V 4 Z
Y
19
N
4
Vtl
9 NVyJ ?OY
•
VN_CC•
O1A�c
pt
C
Y
��C
��
pa
1Y
11L
�N-_=
O
•� N V Y.
y, QJ iRC
wCp
^
iuf
p Q
YiY
G V Y
N�a
V
N a
�lwC Y�
■ /�0
GYp..
p� V e
�q!+
A�
AO Y8
M
yyA
4
9 u"y
N ✓
M= T
CqC
C Pwy y.
r
Y
9
Y
�pp
/�S,
p4 V- pppra$yy
..GYG
JLg=
z
F- O -ice
.cSa
p.V M
�y{�
t
yyyyyyy y� > M4! 1 �Y9w ,
12 CIA r
ZI
yq I C ■ ° L L w « « Q MO
C µ
�ry �Cµ�a�
Y+I �V-Him �N«+ 1 C4^+•NO �Yt.
0.Y. Q ' C Mgg£.r. YY� N �4I {yµ} N L pyNt� C
pz�r V G Y. ~NY C �alrt. J W ►� C _4 C��6 pp0
NV a:�I �99 YY pN �YI µY
N` Plat V MW Y Y Y M
« pS Lx N � Y,�. � Caw � 8 � \. � d `
° +}��ii .1� �s ^T�.- �SY � .'d.. .'i a'S w1°r�
Y. tOu Ut 9-4
yµ �yt�u9 Npl Q dye yM`yI p 0 v. � N
u 1� _ n1 M rf Yf aQ A
G.O OC C 0=yµ A pO -wqµ 9a/ S .. LOC xT_-, 6M4Oh �.
N \.r �sG MN E4 O e«Y. L
LC �M 'm $ cira J.5
�yyQ, qq` C� 4.0.1 « }64Yx
iiir 3t��
ya p� H p�C C�q yWml yN =• .9 N. �y N�� GM�� N�UU"'...
YY ! � � M�� V ��6 R+jA r•� �, � � %dam � 4ND� VII ��l1�
] ■nnlO Y �y� PLC Og I�C�MV a �. �y� ONtl LNV
O � ,^ c O V ��a N • ��~~a� ate' Y � ���
sit0
«4j N■ n -c— 1! G4 Q V µ+M0 V YS^ Cr yeaµ•
.�C w M C C� JCy 2 S-';
W Fi �tl C•� C! MM +t ep
C L N �: i L N «C
aLLQ NVp �4C^I L +. 9 rGO � MeNN«0 `Y.Ad pTj6MaUY
0•LU- YdM {� M y ON i•P O�Oi
n`Il l�+r. �� �19GG¢ «� d� _> p�pA G�� ■�C��. y�aOOt p °•
C
a i ^ot
W.2 ° QI
SIYµ pNp��Y °i 'i to �i�1INOC4. VQ� +� �YN11 LSS � ^5�I r
C C LN Q1 Vi ^« 9LQ� M ^@M +Y LV N yCIV3 ar
Nr��y��{ N6 LOIN C� «� N Slf
13
E
y �.
ANN
Y
� Y
4
V«
� ";
O CO O=
O L
1i♦'Gad �
„�
.,�� Y Y Y
i�
.it
Y
/
H1,
Y 4 Y
M W
e7 O
p
yyY
4G�o
N
iq
C
C
,y
Y
(�Y
yW
SJ
YFs � « N-
Y�
4 Y
C
is
Y�
K �.
4IkMt
�
y�.4
0~
ytiy
q`
Oi1��N
C
YCLp�
�A
]t�0
X3
M
Kry`
w
a
N
N
C
R.
r'i
i1
Y C
gas
fA
�W
pi
ALA
We
g4
w
wg,&
y
G 1
0Y
H°
G
C°
Ey
!
V
MY i•
F58
8
it ka
ai
Y l
N N
N Vp
N�
v
lip
YaYi^
M
CM
M
_
�i
Y YL
p 'a�rt eyy�tc�
.0
cpN
iL
(
Y W
Y
4.ir.
�q+a�`
f^i
yy6.. YtY rr�
N.0
aNs��L�Yyy
ty
V�
KI`N.
r"
YY4 O
Z^
Y
A
iL
0.1
a
A pw
Y
' ^3
P
Yy6
R
oN
IF
7
W 4'±ur
W
O '! o
w
�r
t
w
CO �q
u Y
31 may.
NGQ
n
Ys 9
C � N
L
n
s
ANN
Y
� Y
4
V«
YY �yZj 0
A
� y
aw
f
p
C
N
M
�Yr
ti
p
yyY
y
Y Y
biI
iq
4Y
C
Y
(�Y
yW
Y
m
4 Y
is
Y�
CYU i�r�
IL ppC
ytiy
q`
Oi1��N
ih
�A
]t�0
4z 4
�I�..Y�
7yy
Ga1���$%++OC
,Ptj
Y�
TMy
�.�
Yya
�
t ■Cs
�W
ALA
Vs
wg,&
F
Y
G
Ey
!
V
MY i•
F58
8
a
Y l
N N
N Vp
N�
v
YaYi^
M
CM
M
_
�i
Y YL
p 'a�rt eyy�tc�
.0
cpN
YY4 O
Z^
Y
A
iL
0.1
a
A pw
Y
' ^3
P
Yy6
R
oN
IF
7
W 4'±ur
W
O '! o
w
�r
t
w
CO �q
u Y
31 may.
NGQ
n
Ys 9
C � N
L
n
s
1
N
A.�
y
V«
YY �yZj 0
A
� y
aw
r+
N
W
biI
iq
4Y
C
K!3,2- w
(�Y
yW
YYY
p�
m
4 Y
Y�
CYU i�r�
IL ppC
ytiy
q`
Oi1��N
ih
�A
]t�0
4z 4
�I�..Y�
7yy
Ga1���$%++OC
,Ptj
Y�
w.p W
m u
�H1Qr
+'p (LI
�W
ALA
YY4 O
Z^
Y
A
iL
0.1
a
A pw
Y
' ^3
P
Yy6
R
oN
IF
7
W 4'±ur
W
O '! o
w
�r
t
w
CO �q
u Y
31 may.
NGQ
n
Ys 9
C � N
L
n
s
\� 4, 4 1
tI
1
1
N
A.�
y
V«
YY �yZj 0
A
� y
aw
r+
N
W
biI
iq
4Y
C
K!3,2- w
(�Y
yW
YYY
p�
atb.,r_
4 Y
\� 4, 4 1
tI
1
�IJ Y M �y
YY �yZj 0
c6cU
V�
a
biI
iq
4Y
C
K!3,2- w
Cg
^3
Y�
CYU i�r�
IL ppC
ytiy
q`
Oi1��N
ih
�A
]t�0
4z 4
�I�..Y�
7yy
Ga1���$%++OC
,Ptj
Y�
w.p W
m u
�H1Qr
+'p (LI
�W
ALA
\� 4, 4 1
tI
1
�,';
7
11
Yl�
L V s
e �
♦YO
C
i j
$la
fir
t'
y�
Ap;
4 M
NY O
irk
L
: M
CW N
T
C
O
p VO
_
LL >yyL>
r
^N„
M
=
V�C
pyt�i�
VEIL
V
�'C4OL
�O
MppMe
,C
~�O
uO
Y'
$a
+ C
set
�..JCV'O
Zia
Y� N
y0.2
M
O `
H�'
L
Oe10
Jnn^^+
'w.
y
S D O
3
M54
L BY
b
1
ri
�
�,';
7
11
Yl�
L V s
�C O U
♦YO
C
i j
$la
Ap;
4 M
NY O
irk
L
: M
CW N
Zw V
0
p VO
C �YYLV'
t_tCL
^N„
M
=
V�C
pyt�i�
VEIL
V
�'C4OL
�O
MppMe
,C
~�O
uO
set
�..JCV'O
YC4�M�N
y0.2
Jnn^^+
�L Ov�eLY
_Y{O�
L BY
'�
IyyT
ZMSA
L.
N
M
0u Y
ti
N
'YLo�C�<
to y
��■yyN
g
Cpl
�y6
NYL��
lvpi
V ^�
'�OyN
Y��
==�
Or
pCN
N L
Y� 8
�
Y +Y V
' 1
O
^ V+
�
C
LiC�
G�
r L
LQ
LN
p
+
Yv
aIz
N
N Y L 1LGL
pN
M
r
Y
^
LT
�O
4'YYY 9Y1 ^.�y1.
CC�i�
�YY.�sG
4T
)yYO
Va
I
1;7
V
t6
N
Y
Y
�
fIn
�
.p
I
i
p
�,';
7
11
Yl�
L V s
�C O U
♦YO
C
i j
$la
Ap;
4 M
NY O
irk
L
: M
CW N
Zw V
0
p VO
C �YYLV'
t_tCL
^N„
M
=
V�C
pyt�i�
VEIL
V
�'C4OL
�O
MppMe
,C
~�O
uO
set
�..JCV'O
YC4�M�N
y0.2
L BY
r� 9
ZMSA
L.
N
�,';
7
11
.,te�
DATE
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
--'=_CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
October 14, 1987
Chairman and Members of the Planning Caorwission
Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer
APPEAL PF PARCEL MAP 5996 - DAVID BOWDEN - The appeal of the
'Mr-taitions of Approval requiring an ia-li u fee for the future
undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities for this project
located on the -south side of Wilson Avenue, west of Haven Avenue -
APN 201_180_59
I. ABSMCT
The applicant is requesting that the requirement to pay in-lieu fees for
the future undergrounding of utilities on the opposite (north) side of
Wilson Avenue be deleted from the project apprival.
II. BACKGROUND. •
The Planning Commission co�niitionally appr'�
, 4...the Tentative Parcel Map
on July 24, 1987. The applicant then appealiIiihe utility fee condition
to the City Council. The City Council heard the appeal on
September 16, x.987. However, the Council, with the consent of the
applit;ant, de0ded to return the appe.al .-back to the Planning Commission
for consideration, because the jsva'--hadnat been discussed at the prior
Planning Commission Hearing, and the Council felt that they did not have
a proper perspective to judge the issue without Planning Commission
input.
The City Council did defer the decision of the appeal to the Planning
Commission with the understanding that the appellant has the option of
r '*tyrning to the City Council if he is not satisfied with the Planning
t,_:-.Assion decision.
Special Condition No. 2 of the previous Planning Commission resolution is
the condition in question. The location of the utilities in relation to
the project is shown on Exhibit *A*.
III. ANALYSIS:
The Commission may want to consider the following factors in the
evalua'.ion of the appeal:
1. The applicant did cooperate with the City by withdrawing an
earlier application for °an eight lot subdivision on the,
property in order to be In compliance with a neighborhood'"
request for a rezoning of the general area to the current rbwer
ITEM P
RCSR
PM5996 - DAVID BOWDEN
OCTOBER 14, 19$7
PAGE 2
r•
density. That project was submitted prior to the
implementation of the current undergrounding pol-
2. The developments to -the north and west of the project were
approved prior to the current policy, therefore, were not
assessed for undergrounding.
3. This project newly meets the criteria of item g of the policy
exemptions (Section 7 of the Policy Resolution, copy attached),
except that the vacant property to the east can contribute to
F° future undergrounding. ;;
However, regardless of the above noted items, the requirement for th•z-fee
for this development is consistent with current Policy.
i' IV. RECiIlii£MOATIM:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider all input and
elements of the appeal -and after such co,-ftideration either:
r 1. Approve the appeal
back an Pp by minute action and direct staff to bring
approval resolution for adoption at the next meeting
thereby term -hating the proceedings.
i
OR
2. .`REco mend denial of the appeal by minute action to be forwarded
to the City Council for a final determination.
Respectfully submitL`d,
k� 1.
Barrye R. Hanson
Senior Civil Engineer
BRH :se
Attachments: Appeal Letter (Exhibit "A ")
Utility Locations (Exhibit "B ")
Undergrounding Policy Resolution
I
I
1 M�
s�
r
D„ W. Bowden
1441 N. Campus Av.
Oncario, Ca 91764
City of Rancho Cucamonga`
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91.730
.' July 31, 1987 v
•
SUBJECT, In lieu, contribution fee for :ture undr.rgrounding of the
existin, overhead utilities -,n the north side of Wilson Av.
City Clerk: -
In January of 1984, I filed TPH #5496. This was delayed tv -4 decision
to re- evaluate the zoning of the area, try the Planning Commissxon.
A decision by the Commissi0ii, was a9tt4- &'up0n to re -zone the area
involving TFM #5956.
I was advised by Rick Gomez City Plii,,,ner, and Sarrye Hanson Civil
Engineer to withdraw the proposed TPM #5996. Upon their request I
then withdrew my TP14.`
The City Council approved the ami,�ndments an June:`19, 1985.
I
Due to the fact that our engineering plans would not comply to the new
zoning requirements. it Was nenessar to ze -en sneer, or
f y g Your new zonsag.
T?:is new expense of. re- engineering was a hardsk4,p on me, and I wns
unable to start immediately on the new engineering necessary to complete
thF map, Had the city not determined That the circumstances warranted
re- s-valaation, the original TPM #5996 would have been approved prior
to this resolution (86 -77) being adopted.
Furthermore the levelnpment north of Wilson (directly involved with this
undergrounding of `utilities) will not be assessed these fees for t:ceir
half of undergrounding. Tt is unlikely and improbable that the =Ier-
grounding will ever be completed, at least not in the foreseeable
future.
This assessment of a ;20,000.00 undergrounding fee therefore is completly
.�scrimi.aatory against T ?M #5996 Should this appeal not be granted
will be forced to seek. legal relief.
Sincerely
D. W. Bowden
cc i
I
ddW
O'dati i T
gzV w
U
a w
-
QL
��u
uj
LLJ
ul
R£SOLLTI'ON N0. 67 -96
N RESOLUrIN' OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCA"GA CSTABLISHING A R&YISEO POLICY FOR THE
UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND
REj3EALING RESOLUTION NO. 8677
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
wishes to repeal Resolution No. 86 -77 which was adopted oo the 28th day of
May, 1986 and establish the revised policy contained herein;
WHEREAS, the Planning Co►timission L, the City of Rancho Cucamonga
wishes to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote
a more aesthetic antl desirable working and living V' I ronment within the city;
and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish •a.,talicy to infom' property
owners and developers of the City goal.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolver, dnd established that all developments,
except those contained in Section 7 and any others specificaliy waived by the
Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing
overhead utility lines including the removal of the related sup,,orting pales
adjacent to and within the lit,"ets of a development as follows:
1. Lines on the project side of the street *:
a. Said lines shall be undergrounded at the developer's expense.
b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that
undergrounding is impractical at present for suck; easons as a short
length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet ?nd not undergrwinded
adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users,
disruption to existing improvements, P ~c., the Developer shall pay ap
in -lieu fee for the full amount per Sec�ion 6.
c. The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one -half the cost
of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on the
opposite side of the street.
2. Lines on the opVsite side of the street from the project: The Developer
s al pay a ep to 06 CftY or one - a t M*unt per Section 6.
3. Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with
es ion a ve an a zg: a - or+"reimbttrsement or pay additional fees
so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one -half the total cost of
undergrounding the lines on both 0 the street.
4. Pole lines containina 66KY Dr liar er electrical lines: All lines shall be
un ergroun a or in-lieu fees pal in actor ance wiffi section 1, 2 or 3,
above, except for 66 KY or larger electrical lines.
P_,5
5. limits of Responsibilities: 1
a. In -lieu fees shall be based upon the length of the property being`
developed from property line to property line (the center Of adjacent
streets for corrlr properties).
b. Undergrounding shall include the entire project frontage and extend
to: (1) the first existing pole eff -site from t!* project bourr-faries
(across the street for corner properties), (2) a new pole erected at a
project boundary (across the street for corner properties), or (3) an
s existing pole within 5 feet of a. project boundary, except at a c"ner.
6. Fee Amosant: The amount for in -lieu fees shall equal the length (per
,«!ctxurs .a times the lanit mount as established by the City Council
based upon information supplied by the utility companies and as updated
periodically as deemed necessary.
i. Exemptions: The following types of projects shall ber''exempt from this
geticy:
a. The addition of functional equipment to existing developments, such
as: loading docks, silos, satellite dishes, antennas, wrter tanks, air
conditioned , cooling towers, enclosure of an outdoor atorage area,
parking and loading are%s, block walls and fences,;:tc.
b. ,Building additions or new free standing builMngs of ``less than 25%. of
the floor area of the existing buildings) on the same assessor °s
parcel, or 5,000 square feet, whichevev is .less.
c. Exterior upgrading or repair of existing developments, such as:
reroofing, addition of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment
screening, repainting and exterior finishes, etc,
d. Interior tenant improvements and non - construction CUP%.
e. The construction of a single family residence on an existing parcel.
f. Existing overhead utility lines located in trails, alleys, and utility
easements . with a heavy concentration of services to adjacent
developments, and the litility lines are 500' or more from the right of
way line of a Special Boulevard.
g. Residential subdivisions of four or, fewer single family residential
parcels, where the utility litres extend at least 6M, offs -Ute from
both the project boundaries and the adjacent property is not likely to
c3ntributi to future undergrounding.
*
All references to streets shall also mean alleys, railroad or channel
rights -of -way, etc.
W
_�_(O
/;-j lfIAOVED AND ADOPTED TKS 10th DAY OF JUNE 1987.
FL?,tNIR6 Co ISSIOR QF T -HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCrMUCA
La y CN
ATTEST:
acre ary
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the ,Planning Caemisi,ion of the City of
I - Rancho Cucamonga, do hsrebY certify that the foregofng Resolution was duly and
regularly introdeied, passed, and adopted by;tbe P1•annin Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
.: Q1 the 10 day of June, 1367, by the following Mott- ;,o -M1t;
{.' AYES,,
!'COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CNITIEA, MCNIEL
NOES: COMMISSIONER§; TOLSTOY
s
ABSENT: GOPMISSIONERS NONE
ABSTAIN': COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY
F:
0
�.i
11
1
L WE ; U%Jlliuumxlk
STAFF AFF° REPORT
DATE: October 14, 1983
TO: Chairman and Members of the.Pla -nin Commission ,.
FZOK: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: LANDSCAPING WITHIN FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY
it
1977
I. BACKGROUND: During the review of pevelopm2nt Review 87 -26
Erman an industrial project located at the southeast corner of
Arrow and Rochester, the Commission conditioned the project to
landscape the adjoining slope embankment of the 1-15 (Devope)
Freeway. Staff has interpreted this action as a poliicy direction
to require all developmer' adjoining the I -15 Freeway to landscape
the freeway right -of -way.
II. ANALYSIS: The Commission's decision was based upon the need for
an scape screening and to .upgrade the appearance of the freeway
corrida.1. In many areas, tti freeway is elevated 20-30 feet above
natural grade which exacerbates the problem of screening roof
equipment and loading areas as required by the Industrial Specific
Plan.
To implement this new policy, staff has prepared the attached
resolution setting forth the C5mmission's policy regarding
landscaping of freeway right-of-'-way. The policy would require a
developer to landscape the adjoining freeway right- of -w?y in
accordance with CalTrans Master planting Plan. Further, the policy
would provide for maintenance through a landscape maintenance
district. CalTrans 'requires that the planting be maintained by .
others for a 20 year :period. CalTrans is preparing the Master
Planting Plan.
III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission adopt the
attached eution establishing, and giving notice of, its policy
regarding freeway landscaping.
Gity /kioo
r 6/
BB; G•ko
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Resolution
ITEM Q
w
E�
r
i
Suamumnil
!y
IT
n
CFCULAnO- N--
f'
I
*»
`t
PLAN
"lopom
f
COLLECTOR
SECOMUM
I
•.r ARTERIAL
a
y
i
EXISnM DITERCHANGE
PROPOSED NTERCHANGE
�.
.J •. �.i -(
.Q
ACC !*3S
GRADE .
,..*
P-MERSECTION FOR
...t.. :. : Vii.- j;.-
}
SPECIAL BOULEVARD
MM SPECIAL M
j
ISPECIAL ;.
E, s
0
RESOLUTION! NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY CF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING, A POLICY REQUIRIi,A,
LANDSCAPING OF FREEWAY RIGHT-CF-WAY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds it desirable to landscape 'the.
I -15 (Devore) Freeway right -of -way because of its significance as a regional
sr*nc ration corridor through the City of Rancho Cucamorga; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds this resolution necessary to
give property owners and developers notice of this policy.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Punning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby declare their policy to be:
1. That all new dex-Ilopment adjacent to the 1 -15
(Devore) Freeway shdll be required to landscape and
irrigate the freeway right -of -wry adjoining their
development site.
2. That the landscaping and irrigation shall be in
conformance with Caltrans Fester Planting Plan
through the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
3. That the new development and the landscaped portion
of the 1 -15 Freeway shall be annexed to an existing
Landscape Maintenence District or a new Landscape
Maintenance District shall be formed affecting the
same properties.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 19$7.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McHiel, Chairmari
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do heresy certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commissien held
on the day of , 1987, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
b
C CITY OF IIANCHO CUCA -MONGA ,
STAFF REPORT
o "a
F tf' Z
DATE: October 14, 1987
TO: Chairman and Nembers of the Pli;nning Commission
FROM. Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Senior,. anner (
SUBJECT: CLARIFICATION OF STREEiSCAPE SL
I. ABSTRACT: Staff is seeking an interpretation from the Commission
regarding the measurement of streetscapp_ sa, backs. Ambiguity has -J
arisen concerning proper measurement of setbacks from the curb
where there are right turn lanes, acceleration lanes, bus stop
turn -outs, and additional travel lanes (Exhibit "A ").
Interpretation from the Commission is necessary to provide for
consistent application of the setback requirements.
II. BACKGROUND: Setbacks for buildings and landscaping were originally I"
measured m the street right -of -way ?ine (eg - "s5' from front
property line). In order tom provide a more consistent streetscape
appearance, the setbacks were changed to be measured from the face
of the ultimate cu-b location (see attached Code excerpts). This
provides a uniform building setback and lan0scape setback
regardless of variation in the street right -of -way w!fdth.
The difficulty lies in trying to measure setbacks' from the curb
where the curb "jogs" In a )ut, such as at a right'`turn lane. In
the past, this has been geviewed on a case -by -case basis and
exceptions were granted accordingly. Traffic studies have
indicated the need for deceler34,,ion /acceleratilon lanes to
accomodate the traffic volumes projected. Fr example, a
neighborhood shopping center on a corner, with multiple driveways,
may have a combination of right turn lanes, acceleriation lanes and
bus stops that could significantly reduce the ambunt of setback
depending upon where it is measured from (Exhibit ";'B ").
In some instances, developers were not "penalized" by the
requirement for a right turn lane and were a7low6d to measure the
setback from where the curb would have normally] os ,,erred, rather
than from the curb of the right turn lane (Exhib, ' "). However,
the building became closer to the street and thehla`Ascape setback
4
was reduced.
i
:TEM R
PLANNING COWI`SSION STAFF REPORT
RE: CLARIFICATION OF STREETSCAPE SETBACKS
October 14, 1987
Page 2
III. ANALYSIS: The purpose of setbacks is to provide open space for
Dui "r'ding separat on,':: dscape treatment, and identify the function
and hiearchy of streets..; For these reasons, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga established ample building, landscape and parking
setbv0s. In order to maintain the scsnic quality of the community
and to provide a consistent streetscape appearance, the ��etbacks
are measured from the ultimate curb face.
:'the strict interpretation of the setback would require measurement
from the ultimate curb face, regardless of whether the curb
int►uded further into a property than it would under normal
conditions (Exhibit YD "1. The imposition of
deceleration /acceleration lanes and extra travel lanes is directly
related to the traffic generated by the project.
It mould seem appropriate to allow right turn lanes and otLer
special shoulder treatments to encroach into the required .
streetscape setbacks provided it is kept to a minimum and "dp5°not
significantly degrade the quality of the street scene. is could
be achieved by amending the regulations _to provide for encroachment
not to exceed a distance of 200 feet ac: >oss the property frontage
(Exhibit "E ") within which the setback would be measured from where
the curb lire would normally be (no penalty for curb jog).
IV. RECOMMENDATION: If the Commission concurs with the approach
UuMned in thl s report, t4en staff should be directed to prepare a
Resolution of Record setting forth the findings and interpretation
of the Commission and to proceed with a Development Code Amenc`�ent
per the work program.
Res fully s Ad, -
Br u
City P anner
BB:DC:ko
Atta.hments Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
Exhibit "D"
Exhibit "E"
Excerpts from Development Code
Excerpts from Industrial Specific Plan
H
FORTH
CITY CF
RANCHo CLjCANLKN�;A
PLANNUc DtvEM EXHIBIT- SCALE:
A
m watt" UN6
COULD Tvie
t lwc
rrrLE:
Sh
Guru C"(�J6
(AA0 Pe W T T r
r
r e r r ♦ r � A w . , . 1
NORTH
PLANNM nr V]SnN F- xHiwr� . --C, sr—ku-
k -5
1 1
ea..0
Af
C� Jxah)
CI'T'Y CJu. I EMt
Fi.A:' NUW,- MTIRON Q EXHIBi't = CArI.E-
I1 0
rli
CITY CF
t :
E.
NuIGPv v
EXHtBCT_r SGkLE: -- '
_. � i
Section 17.08.040
D. Streetseape Setbacks. It is the intent of this Section to create streetscape
stardards for landscape, building and parking setback that help to identify the
function of streets and to improve the scenic quality of the �!om munity. The
following table, Table 17.08.040 sets forth the minimum setbacks based upon the
street classification in the Circulation Plan of the General Plan. These setbacks
shall be required of all developments which contair• or abut on ans one of the
following street classifications.
TABLE 17.08.040 -D STREE ESCAPE SETBACKS
STANDARD
FEATURE BUILDING PARKING LANDSCAPE cat WALL
1. Detached SFR ,� I
a) Major /Special Blvd. 45 ft. 18 1`t. 20 ft. avg, 18 ft min.
b) Secondary/ Collector 35 ft. 15 ft. 18 ft. avg, 15 ft min.
2. Attached SFR and MFR
a) Major /Special Blvd.,; 45 fL a 30 ft ' 45 ft. avg, 30 ft min.c
b) Secondary/ Collector 35 ft.c 25 ft. ;u ft. avg, 25 ft min.c
Notes: —
E.
a. Setbacks contained in Table 17.08.040 -D snall be measured from face of the
ultimate curb location.
b. On existing lots of record, parcels Iess than 175 feet in depth, need not
provide a setback or landscaping greater thsn 209E of the depth of the
property (excluding right -of -way area).
C. Add 10 feet within 11, MH and H Residential Districts.
'Baccn;5 serewk •- Pwr u i s +'ems L LUMA-6 ww
uTbr(X,
Front Yard Landscaping. Where required, in Table 17.08.040 -C front yard
landscaping shall include, at a minimum, one 15 -gallon size tree, one 5- gallon size
tree, seeded ground cover, and a permanent irrigation system to be installed by
the developer prior to occupancy. This requirement shall be in addition to
required street trees.
y I
--78- r� ;.
a
10
�1 1111F
*V7 Se•:tinn 17.1Q.044,
B. Setbacks. The following table, TABLE 11.10.040-B sets forth the minimum
setbacks for buildings and parking facilities, as well as the amount of the setback 7
to ba; landscaped. These provisions apply equally to each of the three commercial
distri�'".
TABLk 17.10.04" - ,-SVMACKS
STANDARD
YARra;, BUILDING PARKING LANDSCAPING
1. Street yard setback (measured
from face of the ultimate
curb locatioi -0:
a. Major /Special Blvd. 45 feet
30 feet 45 felt average, not less
than 30'
b. Secondary Collector
35 foot Average, not less
streets /Local streRb 35 feet
25 feet than 25'
2. Rear property line setback:
s. Adjacent to existing or
piann,!�3 res- Niential
development 20 feet
10 feet to feet
b. Adjacent to other existing
or planned commercial or
industrial development 0 0 0
3. Interior side property line
setback:
a. '.adjacent to existing or
planned residential
development 20 feet 10 feet 10 feet
b. Adjacent to existing or
planned commercial or
industrial development 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet
s
NOTES:
1. On existing lo,'s of record, parcels less than 175 feet in depth, need not provide a
setback lir lan,js� aping greater than 20% of the depth of the property (excluding
right- of- way ,e� ).
a
0-
_..
Building
I ". *am
I
Ong
s 24V 5
3S 20'
UAiAt@rI%4ftd ficm the
b(i,- ftdostrian
feet
, wit +Mill be
ftl loft -,7 (except
fOrW it- ON* a. S. througn
Pv- stmt- Clapification
We` except when rea
area '90M. 'aside street the setback A,
be S I minis".
111-32
%
R
Definition
sertltetks i nc"fud'e" =tta f mini mum
Oinftm parki
4,§m*& and
4MOI 1 c
fmatages.
-setbacks are determined from
Street46ape Setback
tu
=�k r*qui rements shall De
04 to street classification
and as shown on Figure
k schLvsjle, except as
0.5 through 0.10 below.
Cti ft.%EMEN-TS
Idf Xg
Building
I ". *am
I
Ong
s 24V 5
3S 20'
UAiAt@rI%4ftd ficm the
b(i,- ftdostrian
feet
, wit +Mill be
ftl loft -,7 (except
fOrW it- ON* a. S. througn
Pv- stmt- Clapification
We` except when rea
area '90M. 'aside street the setback A,
be S I minis".
111-32
%
R
Santa re Sonflera Pack Corporation
CORPORATE COMMUNlCATI4N5 DEPARTMENT
Oneranta Fe plaza
5200 r- pt Sheila Street NEWS
Los 1{ =gyres, California 90040
213126,::,331 September 18, 1987 B 5
Santa Fe Railway will operate a special :rain on October 17 between Los
Angeles and San Bernardino to commemorate the tailroad'a centennial into Los
Angeles, and to promote railroad crossing safety through a statewide program
entitled Operation Lifesaver. The! one -day, whistle stop, round trip will `
begin at Los Angeles Union Passenger Terminal at 9:00 a.m.,jand includes 17
stops en routi to San Bernardino. The, stop at San Dimas will include a
reenactment of the completion tf the line with a 'gold spike' driving
ceremony. Service between Los Angeles and goints,east of San Bernardino was
inaugurated on May 31, 1887, when lines of two pri- acessor railroads were
joined at Mud Springs, now part of San Dimas. Since the line's completion a
centurl ago, 123 at grade railroad crossings have been gradually placed along
this 59 -mlie section of trackage, with another 39 grade separations, totaling
162 vehicular crossings on Santa Fe's Second Subdivision, Los Angeles
Division. With an average of two at grade crossings per mile, Santa Fe "hopes
to emphasize grade crossing safety awareness as - major theme of the
centennial trip..
Santa Fe and Amtrak will provide equipment for the 10 -car ;special
passenger train, dubbed The Santa Fe Railway Centennial Chief /Operation
Lifesaver Express. For five decades prior to Amtrak assuming passen #er
service on Sonta Fe Railway routes in 1971, ;ta Fe operated such y.p11 -known
trains as the Super Chief, Chief, San Francisco Chief, Kansas City Chief and
Texas Chief. A freight train operating on the system as recently,!) "'as the early
rt
1980s was also named the Chief. The Native American theme has bjfer, part of
Santa Fe's corporate culture and heritage for over a century.
The Centennial Chief /Operation Lifesaver Express will operate`bvei; the
line known today as Santa Fe`s Second Subdivision of its Lou Angeles Division,
(more)
1
extending 59 miles between the Inland Empire city of San Bernardino and
downtown Los Angeles.. Appxoximately 550 ,vests of 19 cities and chambers of
commerce aL ng the route, the railroads (Santa Fe and Amtrak), views media and
e
Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties will rids the tr &in by ii;tvitation
only. Public programs are scheduled for Pasadena t30,minute program), Azusa
(20 minute program), San Dimas (30 minute program), $Poona and Rancho
Cucamonga (20 minutes each), zn'additioW five minute whistle stops will be
made at a dozen other communitiO. (See attached schedule.) Several
communities along the route are celebrating centennials in 1987, with some
having roots dating back to their creation by a. railroad. Claremont,,CA., on
the eastern edge of Los Angeles County, was founded by The Pacific Land
Improvement Company, a - ubsidiary of The ncchison, Topeka and Santa.xt- Railway
Company in the 1880s.
`It isn't every day that a company has an opportunity to reaffirm its
heritage and commitment to thoss communities that we have been mutual'``'
neighbors with for a "century,' says Q. W. "Sing' Torpin, general L "onager of_
the half of Santa Fe Railway's 11,600 mile system defined as the Weacern
Region. 'Santa Pe was - nstrumental in opening up competitive rail
transportation to the Los Angeles basin one - hundred years ago, decades before
interstate highway, air cargo and Pacific Rim trade developed,- according to
Torpin, who says, 'The communities along Lhe route, as well as the Santa Pe
Railway, have been the beneficiaries of our transportation system in this
area. It is as viably today as it was a century ago. Because we also have a
commitment to safety at railroad crossings, we will be providin -, materials on
Operation LU*saver to everyona aboard tbit; train.R
Santa Fe officials estimate that 100,000 rail cars will pass over the
Second Subdivision in 1987, the majority rolling west to Los Angeles carrying
(mare;
r✓ -3-
truck trailers and ocean containers that will be distributed throughout
southern California. About 12,000 of those freight lore till ce distributed
to businesses betW**Pi: cos Angeles and San Bernardino this yedr.
curing World war 11 Santa Fe served no less than V citrus packing houses
on the Second Subdivisic'_ in addition to a steel mill, a munitions
manufa',turing plant, a,rock,,,qua_ry and other businesses and industries that
f:
accounted for nearly 50,000 freight cars of business dropped off or picked up
't along the Second Subdivision in 1544. 5,-,ta Fe also operated 15'4x- ly
assenger trains on the line that year.
While steam locomotives have given way to modern, computer - assisted diesel
electric locomotives, and there is demand for only one Amtrak train on the
line, 4he Los Angelos to Chicago Southwest Chief, 1usinesses still use Santa
Fe to deliver the freight. ''luring the past few decades there has been a
quieE transition away from the traditional Wxcar to the more flexible
semi -truck trailer ;:;It can move by highway or by railroad on a flatcar,•
F
explains Torpin. 'You may not see as many';boxears sitting in spur tracks
I,! along the line, but ,,ou do see sa -. .— tre.iers sitting at the loading docks.
Many of those bra ;hers moved into town, and /or will move out of town on a
railroad flatcar.'
Even though Torpin admits railroading still involves steel wheels on steel
rails that are still four- foot - eight- and - one - half - inches apart, he says that
this is about All that is constant in railroad transportation. 'We are
rethinking the way railroad transporta� n Phould fit into today's economic
and social enviromae -t,' claiAo rorpia. 'Pha. process has brought about
change, slich as cabooses coming off trains and electronic, computerized
sensors like the one in Duarte, CA. taking on the duties of making 'sure all is
mechanically well with_, train !when it rolls past. We have also workeLl with
(move)
\�J
government At all levels to enhance railroad crossiu warning j
- g g devices that
M1re once Alit wooden posts slid oW gay be sophisticeated electronic sentries.
r �'
The cost for elec�_eonj,c W4Zn n
g 4vic" may range up to $250,000
but saving a life is xettairl l.___„ Per eross3ng, .J
y Worth the cost. There Will be more change in
the future because there must be change° crier for aonpaniss like Santa !e
G� be successful for anoEper century. it is a trip like, this one that shows
hoW far W)' Ve COX* an&7fioW far We Can ga.•
Vii#
iY
it
SANTA FE RAILRAY cmaENNIAL CHIEF SCHEDULE
OCTOBER 17,- 1987
I
7
8645 a.m, Program at Las An
Sales Union Passenger Terminal
(LAUPT) Platform;Area
,9:00 a.m. Depart (Dp) LAUPT on Second Subdivisio:7, Los An-
96169 Division, Atchison,, Topeka & Santa Fe_e�'Iwap
9:18 a.m. Arrive (Ar) at South Pasadena %fission sad Meridian
Streets)
9:23 a.m. Dp South Pasadena
9331' a.m. Ar at Pasadena Santa Fe /Amtrak Depot, 222 S. 3apmond
Avenue for 30 minute program
10:01 a.m.' Dp Pasadena
10:16 a.o. Ar Arcadia at farmer d
Clara Street spat '3t,.at Ave:x:e and Santa
10 :15 a.m, Dp Arcadia
10:18 a.m. Ar Monrovia at Santa Fe Depot, Railroad Avenue end
Myrtle Avenue
1023 a.m. Dp Monrovia
10:25 a.m. Ar Duarte. east of Highland Avenue
1000 a.m. Dp Duarta
10:33 a.m. Ar Irwindale, ban�':th Irwindale Avenue overpaus
10:38 a.m. Dp Irwindale
10t42 a.m. At Azusa, east of Santa 1'o DePac, Azusa Avenue and
Santa Fe Avenue for 30 minute program
11:12 a.m. Dp Azusa
11:18 a.m. Ar Glendora, :test of Glendora Avenue, with progatist at
Vermont Avenue
11:23 % Dp Glendora
11:28 a.m.
Ar at 5sa Dimas, edlat of Manta tista for 30 *mute
pro : -am, including driving of the "gold" spikaa
12:06 noon Dp San Dimas
ti '
Vam"."
.� 2
Santa Fe Railya,. Eontsunia�, Wai Sehedula "
A
� Cana' d,
U
12:03 p.m. Ar La V*zno at "S" Street
13:08 p.m. Dp ..r Verne
12:12 p.m. Ar at Pomona. -vest oi' Garay Avenues at the Santa
Fe /Amtrak Depot, 2M, H. Car-4 Avenue for 20 minute
groar4m _
12:32 p.m. Dp Pomoa%
I2:36;p.m. Ar Clarasiont at College Avsaua 'or 15 minuta program
12:51 ;�,a. Dp Claremont
12:54 p.w At Hodiclair Ott the Cal'xans Transportation Center on
Arrow Sigh"y
12 :59 p.m. Dp Hontaiair
1:04 p.m. Ar UpUzd ear `;of see Street at Santa Fe Depot
1 :09 p.m. Op Vol ! \' '',....�....w ....�.
E1:35 :15 p.m. , 4x at ,rancho Cucamonga tanKa To Dapot, 9rch£ bald mW
8th SCrW- for 20 minuta program
' P.M. DP Rancho Cu�wonga _ _T
1 :45 p.m. Ar it Fnutakna at Sierra Avenue
1:50 p.m. Dp Fontana
1:58 p.m. Ar Rialti at Riverside Avenue -
2:03 p.m. !)p RW14
2:10 p.m. Ar Sea Earnardiwl at the Santa Fe Ra:ilvay /A ttsak Dsrot,
117" H. ThirS'ttroet for grogram and t.Arning of tau train
2:45 p.m. Dp San Surnxardino for return trip with stops to detrain
passengers att Rancho CucaL4nga, Potions., San MMus, Azusa
and Paradena, with arrival at LAMPT spgroxteately 5 :00 p.m.