Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1987/11/25 - Agenda Packet
0701 -02 011-25-87 PC Agenda LZ 4 �l�A 12 C'd Ir OF f ^R, RANCHO Ay�gGN'CrG C ��V10/6r� M 1 i 7 iV1 U 177 WEDNEST'AY -.YOVEMBER, 25,198:' 4:00 p.m. molls PARK Cii)<b114[ &ff GENTRR 9151 BASE Ll'IdE R"CRO CUCAMONGA, CALDgORMA L Pledge of Allegiamee IL Roll Call Commissionee 3lakesley , Commissioner Emerick Commissioner Chitiea _ Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Talstoy 1IL &u<oaae aneahs IV. Cwt Calendar The, following Consent Cale ,At r iterri s are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will.,w ;acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. It my ins has concern over any item, it should be removed for discusav:: A. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-21 - ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH - A request to convert an existing 1,868 square foot single family residence to an office for the Alta Loma Christian Church on .25 acres of land in th,s Low Residential District (less than 2 dweliiW units per acre), located on the west side of Sapphire, across ,.4 !om Orange - APN. 1062- 332 -23. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-41 - SHIMAJI - The development of Phase II construction of an approved Master Plan on a 1.28 acre site. Phase 11 consisting of an 11,000 square foot manufacturing building in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located at 8677 Utica Avenue - APN: 209- 142 -24. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSI6NT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVifllW LAIRD CONSTRUCTION - A proposal to develop a mull tenant indusQ- ,,;,- Vwarehouse facility on 4.5 acres of land in the General Industrl& Mtrict, lubarea 5, located on the west side o. Lucas Ranch Road, north of 5th Street - APN-. 210 - 013 -01. Ji k f Y. New 4, D. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERA'TJON, PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CREDIT FOR DEVELOPMENIT REVIEW 84-22 - LYNNHAVEN DEVELOPMENT Continued f1.6m November 10, 1987. E. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87--47 - LINPRO - The development of a' 45.85 acre industrial master plan consisting of a mixed use of ? rwalti- tenants, manufactu ling and research and development projects within a 3 block area of a prey ?ously approved master plan, ',' ;Id Phase I development consisting of 5, multi - tenant buildings totaling 82,200 square feet in Block 1, 8 manufacturing buildings totaling 94,900 square feet in Block 2, and 3 research end development buildings totaling 61,816 square feet In Block 3, in the industrial Park District, Subarea 16, located at the northwest co(!ner of 4t1a Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 210- 062.-02, 11, 15, 26, 32 and 33. F.'; DEVEL& MENT REVIEW 83-36 - DELPIT - A development of a ,333 fa',c food drive -thru Burger NEW restaurant within an approved shopping center, in the Neighborhood Commercia' '`,District of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the ;northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Base Line Road - APN 202- 801 -27. G. PLAN CHECK 87 -7801 - MACIAS - The appeal of the Planning Commission policy requiring tie roof material on new construction, located at 10378 25th Street - APN: 209-122-20., H. APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW £s6 -27 - CALIFORNIA FINISHED METALS - The appeal of Conditions of Approval requiring the undergrounding of utilities alrAS T 7th. Street and Center Avenue for the development of a warehouse addition in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) located on the southwest corner of Center Avenue and 7th Street - APN: 209 - 262 -13. VL -'Director's Reports L DETERMINATION OF THE CIRCULATION PATTERN FOR AVILA PYENUE - A staff request for Planning Commission direction "concerning the circulation pattern for Avila Avenue located between Cade Del Prado and Alder Street - APX: 208- 921-7,` 11. VI L Brentt The Planning Commission s{itiil take a 30 "ute break for dinner. VI1I:, Pt bU- .11mi-Ings The following items are public Bearings in which concerneC,,individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the .Chairman and addrear the Commission by stating your name and adares& All such ophdonsliall be lh Cited to S minutes per individual for each project. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT M D GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -74G - TAC PEVELOPMENfi - A request to amend the General Plan Laid Use Man from Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to high Residential (24- 36 dwelling units per acre) for 5.05 acres of land, located on the south side of Base Line road, west of Archibald - APR: 208 -031- 18,19. (Continued from October 28, 1981.) E R NV02MF v1EN1a ,t ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT NTT 87 -U5 - TAC DEVELOPMENT - request to amend the Development Districts Map from Low- Medium (44 dwelling units per acre) to high Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per acre) attached ^=ith the Senior Housirg Overlay District (SHOW -1o, the base district foi- 5.05 acres of land, located on the south side of Base sine Road, west of Archibald Avenue - APN 208- 031 -18, 19. (Continued from October 28, 1987.) K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASS`r 3SMENT AND GENERAL ' PLAN AMENDMENT 87-04H - TAC DEVELOPMENT - A request to amend the Land Use Element o11 the General Plan from Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Office for 1.69 acres of land, )' Bated on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road - APN: 208-031-17, 5¢_ 55, 56 and 57. (Continued from October 28, 1987.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87:06 - TAC DEVELOPMENT - A request to amend the Development Districts Map from Low - Mediun. Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to Office Professional for 1.69 acres of land,, located on'7he west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base lane Recd - APN: 208 - 031 -17, 54, 55, 56 and 57. (Continued from October 28, 1987.) L. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY-02 - TAC DEVELOPMENT - A Development Weement bRween the City of Rancho Cucamonga and TAC' i;��alopment Corporation for the purpose of providing a Senior dousing Project per the requirements of the Senior Houring Overlay District (Section 17.20.040 of the Development Cods -, Ordinance 211) for 170 apartmehi urft to be ,`.',fated on the soot;.-, side of Base Lithe Road, west of Archibald �' fenUe - APN. 208- 031-18, 19. (Continued from`Oetober 28, 1984j r F t M. ENVIRgNME IT_AL ASSESSMENT AND TLkifi p;,ter TRACT 13579 - ,-- r- e- s- id- -en—tial develop�t:ent camprzsini b AY` q ` -� ra}-amy 9 units on . usucres of land in the o mthe eeast side ofsgellman, . $�q el}3�tg pear acrd), ocs 211- 474 -12. (Continued Aver )E, 325' nor;) of 19th Street - AFN: from PPPTTTo�re3aber 10, 1987.) 0. ASSEsSM XT AND CONDMONA%' USE ,N. BXVi 7ONME TAI. &CROWN LE3THERA buiZdingn std a , . - GRO foot sanctuary PEit14IlT rate an' proposal is buila a 4, 00 square 2,3oo sq mre foot, office and classroom building; and operate the Very extended day nursery and resehool on 5 acres nut ac?e) o Low Residential U�istriet ?less than 2 dwelling the Etiwanda Specific Plen, located at 61123 Etiwanda Avenue - .�FN: 227 - 06143. TRACT 13742 O, ENVIRONMENT AL ASS GROU - Ae3 denttNalEst�bw� ion and in - A3 :sND C iIZVESTME sp on 49 acres of ]and With design review of a 17 Iot suhdivi i (-4-a we�S units per acre), the LOW' Residential Distri w 3 loesieu on the south aide of Arrow Dote, i ►50' feat west of Sierra i Madre - .LPN: ` 207 -34`� 22. Assocs�ated wish the project :.G a Tree Removal Permit. P. ENS ONMENTAL ASS $ AND D VICTORIA -C 1 PLAN AMENDN1EltT S ? -03 - CFPY ammuAt►iN J E �Ie9C j A proposal to amen the Victoric e_j facilities as a Conditional Use Pe' for ceFtain- community Facilities specified in the C^mmere:al Standards And Community ^actions of the Viccu a Community Plan. INDUSTRIAL Q. ENVIItONME1sT_E ASS`raiSNCITY OFDiANGIiq AMONG�A� PLAl� AieiENDM rovide pry( lures for reque ^,ting modification An �`o+endment top and to au htrize ++medium of rail service development standards ermitied ;zse m Subarea wholesale storage and distribution +� p Wfalo Avenue on 13 bounded by the I -15 Freeway on the east, the west, approximately 280' south of 8th Street on the north end ,approximately 1,335' north of 4th Street on the south. ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT R. ENVIRONMVNTAI. 87 -10 CYl`Y OF RA1�1CH0 D� {lGT AMENDMENT' ment District CiJC H� A - A request to amend the Develop Its p, acre) Map from Low Density Residential („-4 4-24 dg _ and Mediuiu High Density Residential (14 24 �'t'' ububarea 1, for General Industrial i, ac.e) to Industrial Specific Plan, east of Grove Avenue and 4.31 acres of land, located north of 541-60 and 207- 51 -�g2. west or Baker Avenues A ; U 11 S. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PL 9N AMEND&IENT 7 - CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMONGA - A requeet to amend the Industrial Specific Tian to expand Subarea 1 to include 4,,1x1 acres of land generally located east of Grove Avenue, north of 8th Street. ar ,-. west of Baker Avenue - APN: 167"541-60 547. -60 and 2W- 251 -22, T.' ENVIRONMENTAv ASSaSMEWT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13728 NOW)IC A residential subdivision and design review of, 34 stnglamily lota on 20.2 acres of land in the Very , Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest cornet of Hillside Road and Sapphir? Street APN: 1061 -1 ?1, 31, 02 and 03. Associated with this development is Tree fter.,vr.1[`Permit 87-81 requesting the removal of 5 mature trees. U, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN i` yD TBNTP.TIVE TRACT 13748 AHMMON HOMES-- A resiaential subdivision and design review of 232 single family lots on 65 acres of land in the Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and Flood Control Districts, located at the northwest corner of Highland Avenue and, Milliken Avenue - APN: A portion of 201- 271 -55. Associatod with the project is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of 19- mature trees. V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10972 - AHMANSON DL'VELOPMENT CO. - A subdivision of 73.6 acres of land into 3 parcels in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street - APN 201 - 271 -55. IS. COUNCII, ERRALS W. MINIMUM LOT SIZE/UNIT SIZE MARKET STUDY DISCUSSION X. Commission Business XL Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed herd are those which do root already appear on this agenda. XIL AdjouxAnent The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. + t KNIT`' MAP i 5...` "Nita Q ciWL99"" i i w � 1t11 c 1 Q I Y.} a'. { a 1 1 1 `I s( j 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REFrJW w e aw DATE: November 25, 1987 TO: Chairman and hers of the Planning Commission PROM: brad Busier, City Planner BY: Greg Gage, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -21 - ALTA request to U-Ivert an existing square oo s ngle family residency: to an office for the Alta Loma Christian Church on .25 acres of land in the Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the vest side of Sapphire, across from Orange - APN 1062 - 332 -23. I. BACKGROUND: At its meeting of November 9 °, 1984, the Planning ommZ�iss ort' approved the above- referenced application for tine conversion of a single family residence to an office which expired one on November 28, 1986. Subsequently, on March 25, 1987, th,e' Commission approved a year time, extension far the Conditional Use Permit which expires November 28, 1987. The item was twice continued by the Planning Commission during the month of January, 1987, due to concerns over the maintenance of a 3.4 acre portion rf the site which had not been landscaped as required at the time of occupancy. In approving the one year lime extension, the Commission directed staff to monitor the progress of the required landscape improvements, and to schedule the Conditional Use Permit for possible revocation proceedings if all improvements were not completed. II. ANALYSIS: Although the church did proceed with hydroseeding the vacant area, the lack of a full irrigation system prevented seedlings from reaching maturity. The church has therefore agreed to install an appropriate irrigation system capable of providing water to the entire site (see attached letter of September 29, 1987), and has also indicated that addFtional hydroseeding will occur once all weed removal and soil treatment has been completed. ITEM A 7 PL41NING CWSkOk �rA&' A MT TIME EXTEN.. FOR COP 84-2I November 25, 1,987 Page 2 Despite the substantial delays encountered in the completion of the landscape a*rid irrigatlon work, the church has recently shoWA-' U intent to ,finally resolve this problem. Accordingly, staff 1111 continue 4o monitor the progress of the improvements to ensure tiat the pre0ous concerns of the Ommission and area residents are addresscd. Should the improveraiits not be completed as indicated by the church, staff will refer the item to the Planning Commission for consideration and possible revocation of the Conditional the Permit. Ill. REC"ENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission consider Ite progress -UT-We church in completing the required landscaping. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support a one year time extension for Conditional Use Permit 84-21, adoption of Vie attached Resolution would be appropriate. AResp, ul ly �.§Wtt2d, ra r City Plainer OB:GG:te Attachments: Letters from Applicant Planning Commission Staff Report of March 25, 1987 Resolution of Approval AWL ALTA LOMA,0HRISTIAN CHURCH �n DAVM L.. M.CLMY t�1MliATllitRt:8flCEET MWTen ALTA LOMA, CAUFOF"A ftM Gctober 29, 1987 —RECEIVED— Greg Gage C17Y OF RANCHO Cuck IOHGA City of Rancho Cucamonga PI.ANNIN3 DIv:s-ofi Planning Division 9320 Baseline Road Suite C OCT ,i01987 Rancho Cucamonga, tAL 91701 °�`!$1�JIiQ�k31J�i1s�k�i4k� CUP No. 84 -21 Resol. No. 84 -1355 'Exp. Date: 11/28/87 Subject: Extension of existing Conditional Use Permit, i CUP 84 -21 I t Dear Sirs, Enclosed is a cheek,' for $62.00 for the renewal of Conditional Use Permit, 84 -21. y�r Sincerely, 'Jeff Green Chairman 1 Board cf Deacons i JG /mz i -r K�I A,3 A n lac ordt fell wal CWy #v alb, Is twobt ,key AL TA LO MA CHRISTIAN DAVO L. UN LARY " i71f:xMl ile 1AWO M k ALTA LO" CAUIOIt�n September 29. 1987 dxF+li Richard L. Alocrn Code Enforcoment Su � rvisor City OF nAeyCHG Cu ar,4' - FLANNiii4 ui . City of Rancho Cucaso: get P.Q. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Ani fi!l Door Mr. Alcorn: AA i As discussed in our conversation of this date: progress is being maale toward Completion of the landscaping proyert pursuant to CUP 84-21. however moat delays h*ve beeu encountered. To bring ycu current, tS4 pro3ect area has undergone: 1, 9aarapinV and grading 2. Complete weed removal M1 3 Installation of underground irrigatia,3',_'system involving five separate stations, tlsotronicslly integrated with the existing irrigation *Yati�sA Final complation,of the proaect requires: 1. Removal of surface rocks. Completion dote: 14 -3 -87 2. 9pct application of 2 -4-D for removal of new woods now too high for mechanical xppiicstion of Roundup. Completion date: 10 -2-87 Chamberlain Waxed Control 3. Application of Roundup for final rLAoval of new growth intentionally promoted by agresaive irrigation. Completion dates 11 -2 -67 Chamberlain Weird Control 4u. Hydroseeding of Creeping Red Fescue. Completion chats,. Week of 11- -23 -57. °,r. Spot applAasantion of 2 -4 -D will occur aai needed to control emergence of reoiduai wetad population. It is the dquirs of the church leadership that this protect be completed acs intelligently and expeditiously as possible. satisfying City requirements aneA our need to be a good neighbor. Please accept the above ropsolaction as our commitment to this and. Sincerely, Jaef y Green Chairman, acrd of Deacons r % A nmd"tominarl4^4Wlawehln whorl nalu rho aWo to h4oahr ri C1 11 i - - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 0 1)O.el; STAFF REPOJ''. I �• 'fin i t. Z DATE: March 25, 1987 '°° 97" TO: Chairman and Myers of the Planning Commission !'I FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner j BY: Greg Gage, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ,fTIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-21 ALTA reques to convert an exis un9 square oo s ny a family residence to an office for the Alta Loma Christian Church on .25 acres of land in the Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Sapphire, across from Orange - APN 1062 - 332 -23,. (Continued from January 28, 1987) I. BACKGROUND: At• its meeting on January 14, 1987, the Planning om�aC— s� si °continued the above referenced time extension request to the Janua,,y 28 "eting. S't-aff requested the continuance to allow t". church ample time to clean up and re -seed its vacant property to the north of the office and pre - school facilities. Prior to tiie Planning Commission meeting of Jdnuepy 28, the resident at 6375 Sapphire submitted twc letters which reiterated previ _xAncerns about the church property. Specifically, the resioen*__> wds concerned about the f*pact of the vacant church property on surrounaing properties, and the compliance of the adjacent church pre - school with approrad operating hours. After reviewing the issue at its January 28, 1987 meeting, -the Commission determined that the necessary clean up and seeding ,lad not been completed. The Commission then continued the item to tonight's meeting end directed the church to proceed with the improvements. I ANALYSIS• Die church has since completed the clean -up and re- see ng of the vacant property (see attached letter) and installed a stand -pipe for irrigation purposes. An inspection of the site conducted on March 18, 1987 revealed thau gemination of the seed had occurred, however the moisture content of the soil was relatively lows. This can be attributed to the limited irrigation facilities which nave been installed and could cause!Ahe seed to die out from lack of moisture. In accordance with the request of the resident at 6375 Sapphire, the adjacent church pre- school was also inspected for compliance with ro ed hours of operation. No violations were evident at AV the t�rne 0 inspection. T"rcu 1 %LANKW�C"Q MA. IORi STAFF REPORT cup 8641 l WHA CHRIS AN CH!lQt;tt <- Page 2 - Usk- The vaCI chuKh property should be monitored by staff to e, -1sure that land*44009 is properly irrigated "and maintained in an a, acceptable Manner- Also, the pre- sxhbol facility should be checked periodica]ly to verify that all conditions of approval are being F observed;, If either of 04 aforementioned issues is determined to woe in viallation, the problems should be referred to the Comeission j for review, and if nrtessary, revocation of Conditional Use Permit 83.04 should be conoftred. : III. Rk_ WNM1TQk, , Staff recQM"ds that the Planning ComA Nsion approve a WW -year time extension for Conditisnal use Per -alit 84-21, xnd that the CO Mission advise the church to provide proper ► irrigation and ro,itine maintenance of aii vacant property north of the existing facilities. s Ae tfutiy suamittkd, Brad �g1 er City Planner . 88:GG,sgr Attachments: Letter from Resident at 5375 5epphire. Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Flap Exhibit "8" - Master Sit plan Exnibit "Cu Elevations I",-Inning Commission Staff Report, January 2$, 1487 Planning Commission Staff Report, January 14, 1497 F� =,,nnhg Commission Staff Report, November 28, 1584 '1,401ution of Time Extension i i i t AR R nab Planning Division Rancho Cucamonga r Re: Tian Extension. for Conditional Use Permit 84- 21 First things first. Before a time extension is granted,, (o�.abo4 enforcing conditions on other CUP concerning the Alta Lo(" i Christiao ^hunch. i1 Following conditions ara not being enforced: 1- Staff Report 9 Jan 85 A- Groundcover and irrigation system 2- Resolution 83 -5$, Section 3. Item *7 Outdoor preschool activity hours The hours are not being Observed or enforced. Dur,ina cold wsati*r - yes at times. But during warm weather the ch.ildrea are outdoors several hours in the AM and after lu most of the afternoon. The hours are lOt3Q -11;45 and 4 -5. Not all day or when ever they feel like it.- The continuous noise of the children yelling and screaming has caused problems. Setter control anC observing the approved hours would be appreciated. Also, the outside play ground is being used at mimes on Sundays. W.H. Ungles v w ... ALTA LQmA CiMp MAN OjW March d, 1987 city of Rancho Cucamonga Planning 000artrrsnt Attn: Grog &a.go RE: Alta LOO* Christian Churr;h Conditional Use pore iL ha.,.: - fir "'-.T?C4Citi b-r. -slit' CF �rre�rp Cw:»4.t •. errs ,err Dear Mr. 6ago, rKO following work has be undev an pleted on the eloped portion of cur church com d p.raparL 1. Grading and Leveling 2. Uydroseeding with sweet allys9m . which is a highly drought resistent and flavoring plant In addition, on Saturday March #, stand pips will bo installed in the center of this field for the purpose of watering the aiiys4asi. is watering will boa done manually with 10 l • se Pt complete the requirements for our tonditionals use Persait. if there is finy question regarding -;tnis mattor please give us; c cell. Sincerely, 99/*, ohn grahase President Alta Los& Christian Church JB /mz �yg 6 ... ALTA LQmA CiMp MAN OjW March d, 1987 city of Rancho Cucamonga Planning 000artrrsnt Attn: Grog &a.go RE: Alta LOO* Christian Churr;h Conditional Use pore iL ha.,.: - fir "'-.T?C4Citi b-r. -slit' CF �rre�rp Cw:»4.t •. errs ,err Dear Mr. 6ago, rKO following work has be undev an pleted on the eloped portion of cur church com d p.raparL 1. Grading and Leveling 2. Uydroseeding with sweet allys9m . which is a highly drought resistent and flavoring plant In addition, on Saturday March #, stand pips will bo installed in the center of this field for the purpose of watering the aiiys4asi. is watering will boa done manually with 10 l • se Pt complete the requirements for our tonditionals use Persait. if there is finy question regarding -;tnis mattor please give us; c cell. Sincerely, 99/*, ohn grahase President Alta Los& Christian Church JB /mz �yg - L-9 ' r C3 ww w O°i e,tA °Ilt,1 ial 4al i r Jr. Aw 2. $, 'a s 7 �(,�J{ Lj ° _ •+ N I •` to -_ � � � m s N t. 'I Via, �l +�' '� .' ••; os .•:i �? c a m SITE PLiiAE tf �: NORTH CITY OF ITEM: " a CUP B4 -;L, PLANNING P .0-41 tj alt.. C4 2 lih J 4J {� FS + aab- Jl- r. AoA i7- P .0-41 tj alt.. C4 2 lih ILA" w ti Zol R J 4J {� FS + en Jl- ILA" w ti Zol R u r. AoA u ' ` v- -exrsnMd .nLe' Rey+ f' rTM i IW �.y. , .: t ! . = f �" v. :a{ � a !' ail �• k ��, j{ t€ t t. T' �1JR^sll> W""+ vy t.Tllou OJ I�Yti t:C6,t�R# 4Y ��.r. sRvety rnheaL 1. ilit 7i if cQJTH \,_' - si'` r ,``. .ff' � . ♦,� • ;'a3+��,' _ t y�4,t N trti�Pfl:ti:�31iy. TW' -��t�:T,� .�.`. =� ffJf � * rY�• ♦•+ F CF.�• iresntr� woop ' 'Bud" A{ 114101ft mod+.. — axlsnp's ,Moog y1.sCrr _ 4TAlN nt .4Dt7vfi TTPI .....j ��j• r,tiw f�R= J�O°dt+ ��Efudtrt � f � '.+.%•`"�'°'d , '' • t ., •`"t ! `'- .'- F- .e"'""""°-. -. - -•- .moo.._. . x7 . XST Mt°UL� St? J 4 tlil Mit T;t*A 'ttPU�mg /s.leLlt110pt, Ka?'A• 1TAily Ai ,ispva. �t'PICAL ' lix- �0_1 3 CITY OF 1 jaNG mail 11 11 t1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -21 - APH 1062- 332 -23 I' 'WHEREAS,, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above- described project, pursuant to Section 17.02.100; and YHEREASS the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described Conditlonal Use Permit. SECTION 1• The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the follwng . ndings R. That pr,;, M1`!nq economic ondltf(ms have caused a distr' sm nra tat . i% j, r -doalopwnt of the A. ` hae current econ" ale, arlca i9, oral,} invontory cc+nditions make it unrersonablz to develop, the project at this time. C. That strict enforcement of the conditiong of approval E regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Node. 0. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. or materially, injurious to,properties -or improvements in the vicinft,, SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Coamxissfion hereby grants a time extens o� p-ror: Project A licant Exeration CUP 84-21 Alta Loma November 28, 1488 Christian Church APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry T. MCNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy- Secretary ,4-12- �e, � P � � I ` � to _ 'UtIQt: 310. 1 U -ILA 1f ISTil4N CHURCH � � ft: No veS 25 L, Page 2 . t� I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing 'Resolution was duty ani` � .. regularly introduced, pissed, and .adapted by the Planning CWJssion cf the t k City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning'iroaxaission herd on 'the 25th day of Novewfier, 1987, by the following vote-to -witi' AYES: COWISSIONERS, + j F NOES: CtlWISSIOVERS: ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: (i .. 1 ,t f. DI DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUVECT: CITY OF RXINCHO CUCAMONGA STAFJ� REPORT "Aovember� 18, 1987 Chairma6'and Members of the Planning Commission Brad BrIler, City Planner Greg Gage, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RZVIEW 87-41 - 3RIMAJI Z The! aeve lopment—o-T Pflase lFcons tructi ono f an approve Master Plan on a 1.28 acre site. Phase 11 consisting of an 11,000 square foot manufacturing building in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located at 8677 Utica Avenue - APH: 209-142-24. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested:- Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 8. Surrounding.,Land Use and Zoni -40ning: north - Vacant, General Industrial (Subarea 8) South - Industrial, Ceneral Industrial (Subarea 8) East - Industrial, General Industrial (Subarea 8) West - Vacant/Industrial, Industrial Park (Subarea 6) C. General Plan Designations: Project site - Genera-Flfn atrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial !List - General Industrial West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The site is Pry_--.ntly developed with a 12,00 square —fo-517—warehouse on the' eastern portion of the property. The proposed building will be located immediately west of the existiny structure on Utica Avenje. Street improvements alOP9,-Atica Avenue for the site have been completed. a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF'REPOkT DR 87 -41 - Shimaji November 26, 1987 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations Number of Numbew %f Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Re fired Provided Industrial 9,490 1 /500 19 19 Office 1,500 1/500 6 6 25 25 II. ANALYSIS: A. 6eneral� �-ilhe applicant is requesting Environmental Assessment or vie instruction of Phase II- of a previously apprdved Master Plan. Phase 11 will corsis4 of an industrial building of approximately 11,000 square feet and the incidental office use within. Upon issuance of a Negative Declaration, the City Planner will grant final approval of ;!t project based on conditions recommended by the Design and Technical Review Committees. B. Design Review Committee: On November 5, 1987 the Committee a es ey, ea, routil) reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the following conditions. 1. A low level wall and planter should be added :within the setback area adjacent to the existing wall at the north side of the projcct entry. 2. The lost level ,screen wall for the p1p�a area should be extended around the building corner- and along the west eleva`jon for approximately 20 feet., a. Additional concrete columns should be provided as supports for the plaza trellis, in order to create a more interesting entry. New columns should be of the same size and texture as those at the building facade. 4. The overhead trellis should be constructed of heavy timbers to provide sufficient mass relative" to the building and supporting columns. 5. Roll -up doors should be painted to match the primary building color (Travertine). 10 PLANNING CQMIT. 14 STIFF - SPORT DR 87 -41 � November 2E, 2987 Pape 3 C. Technical Review Comatittee- The Technical Review Committee rev ewe 0 pr ec at 'TTs' meeting on November 3, 1987, and daterIne,d lihat with recommended conditions of approval the project is` consistent with applicable City Standards and Ordinances. fit. EnvironwentAl Assessment- Upon review of Part I of the Initial '=acy "a'nr" upon comp a lOn of Part 11 of the Environmental Checklist,: staff has found no significant environmental impacts related to, the development of this project, III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial a' peck c an arse General Plans. )�e project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental inpact. In addition, the pOoposed site plan and building desiign together with recommended conditions, will comply With the Industrial Specific Plan and all applicable City Standards. IV. R£COMMENDATTIM: Staff ftcommends apprWal and issuance of a Negative ec aration for Development Review 87-41, Resp y', 4)y bmit d, r B r anner seGs:vc Attachments: Exhibit 'A" Location Map Exhibit *8" » Site Plan Exhibit "C"h;- Building{ Elevations i� y � J r a Y ,may P6A#PTDdE3 l.Ef1ETp uow «a.ew.. wo.o wrvt i w,.r,+nr. ,rc•.a.w t� wa+n n.re. ara wacc�n�•. K...aNr �� assR r-ri+. �wr uru.�w wsw�� wti. ,, i �..rc ur•stac h1i tertq Yr+• au rs+er�row w�rwu• MIWr ION MY� •iMt� 1.ip M6 CR ]Mi faY NURTH 1 Clay CF tTEM: �? 8 87• �! 1 Rt�,l�� TM E: S t-r_g PLa jq R AltihiM D€VL EXHIBIT, "R" " - SCALE.. N T S i mftm.+d.�.r NCdI'it1ECZYATIGN :i wew.heA.nr._ wu err► � �,� �... ELITE "ATION w.�wa�w..r► how wzar - T �+dir rrEvt: -D, R- 87- HI 'TITLE =�I?It,eiuC- E�EVA.Tt�� EXHIBIT-���..� SCALE-. NTC. C L]I 1 ;�- II. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA MIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Nov% *her 25, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission PROM: B! ^ad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENYIR2tt_ETAt, ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -28 - LAIRD proposal o develop a mu an - e- n us r a ar ouse facility on 4.5 ages of land in the General Industeial District, Subarea 5, located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, north of 5th Street - APN: 210 - 013 -01. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: J A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use lnd 2�oni�n_g Nortn - n us a ; uBarea -5, General Industrial ; -- South - industrial; Subarea 5, General Industrial East - Vacant; Subarea 5, General Industrial West - Railroad Line; Subarea 5, General Industrial C. General Plan Designations: Project site = Grderal industrial North - Genera'.f Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industria-1 -. D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and has no s gm can veret*1U5n, A railroad line abuts the property to the west, The properties north and south are developed with similar industrial projects. Street improven*nts have been completed along Lucas Ranch Road except for driveways and sidewalks. 0 ITEM C q PLANNING Col i 8"S CliI iU~P OR 8.7-28 - Laird CM5t etion �� .,. November 25, 1987 Page 2 r+ E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Tye Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Ilse ERPL VO Ratio Reed Provided Office 6,150 11250 25 25 Industrial 18,950 1%'5.00 38 38 Warehouse( 63,075 Varies* 58 60 1- 20000_ 1/1000. 2CK -40K 1/2000 40K -ever 1/4000 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project usec�s consistent i, th the General Plan and die "Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea : --,Ar d is compatible with other praj'ects in the surrounding area. As p,escribe,i by the Indus' trial Specific Plan, a rail spur easement shi4l be provided. Thy- biilding will then be constructed to accommodate futN rail 9arvice. Upon approval of the Negative ,Declaration, the City Planner will grant final - approval of the project based on recommendations made bj the Design and Technical Review Committees. n Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel, Blakesly, Vrro "a reviewedtie"projett on August 6, 1337 and forwarded it to the Planning CorAission with the foilnwing recommendations: 1. Reveals should be used on all building elevations and should be a minimum of 3" wide. 2. The contrast in color found on the eas+ elevation of Building "B" should be wrapped around onto the northeast portion of Building "B" using the sat.ae stepped pattern. ?. All roll -up doors should be painted the same primary color as the building in order to make them "disappear ". C. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and II of the Initial Study avTvee been camie`ted ancTno significant impacts have been found related to the construction of the proposed building. IT- -� Ailli 4- F RL�PORF DR 87�2 -Lai�rdg nns srVC, on -- m . I I oAYe ber 25, 119R3,6- k, page � III. FACTS, z The proposed use is consistew& ",v c the enera an m n strial SpeG�ific Plan. The building design and sitC' pla ren n, together with recoded conditions of approval ace in c` caap1 ance *itb the Industrial specific plan, Subarea 5, and all other applicable City S Andards. IY. RECO*ODATION: Staff recomends that the Planning Commission ssae a .gaffe Declaration for DevelopWnt Review 87-28. °., W11, d, r *.CW:ko { Attachments: Exhibit "A' - Location Hap � Exhibit "8" - Site plan Exhibit "C" Elevations 1 R NURTIJ= CITY OF rrEr,,I: PLANNING FXVISnN EXHIBrr. A', SCALE= IL6 _ i cp -1 :Ali cgo� ti 0 evow"m TRW$ --MMDCO"" V4*MWVVa=ALACCWr mom REM= a SECTION VA ITEM. TITLE: 6TUI VLAI-) EXHIBIT. SCALE.- NCB LJ — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: November 25 , 1987 To: Planning commission Frcim: Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator Subject: Request for consideration Private Open Space Credit for DR84 -22 LynnHaven (Continued from November 10, 1987.) BFi�cGRdt' Application has been made by D.L. King Associates (Exhibit A) for Lan Bentsenl+:3, LynnHaven Development,, Under provisions of section 15.32.030 of the Cities 'R?ulicipal Code, ordinance lo5 -C a! lows credit for up to 50 ag inst Park Development Bees (Exhibit B) This is based on consideration of Private Open Space Development meeting certain basic recreation nesdc+ within the community. LynnHaven is located, east of Haven Avenue, between Lemon and Highland Avenues. Built oaz 15.37 acres, the 315 rental condomi,iums yield 20.58 units per acre. The applicant requests consideration of 3.1 acres of private open space as identified in Exhibit "C" in meeting the minimum three acres required under the Ordinance. also being evaluated are three Pools, one childrens play area, one gang court area, various buildings and areas for picnicking. The aPPlication was reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission on October 20, 1987. The Commission feels the Odinance. First, the 3.1 acres identified in ude numerous areas that are pedestrial circulation corridors and not as the Ordinance requireall . adaptable for Park and Recreation purpose-11 Second, two of the Recreation Elements are represented, but not functioning as proposed. The Recreation buildings are laundry rooms and rental offices. Additionally, the site ;has no permanent picnicking facilities thek� would t. characersti.ally include barbecues, shade shelters, tablee, etc. Lacking these elements, the development does not meet the Ordinance minimum requirements of four recreation elements. Based on the above, the Park and Recreation commission feels the development does not qualify under the Ordinance requirement. ITEM D 71� -77777`,� LynnHaven Credit for Private open Space Novamber 25, 1987 Page Off MEN= • The Park and. Recreaticn Commission recommends ,that the Planning Co=tission deny the request for avedit for Private open space on the LynnHaverx Developmentr,. DL:bs D 0 s r-'1H 3smae-lates • p canners ii OCT l _ a;zr linty of Rancho Cucamonga ,_. The rancho Cucamonga Planning �vinmission The i,ancho Cucamonga Park,.DevAormant Corarnission attention. Mr.Dave Uonard, Park fmjet, &ordinator Community Services Department 9320 Baseline Road, 7� 0. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga California 91730 1 October 1987 page l qi to re: Request for consideration, Private Clpen Space credit Per ordinance No. 105 -c Ladies and Gentlemo Please accept this request for consideration of Private Open Space Credit, per the rerq+iirements of Ordinance 105 -C. I am makinj this request atr behalf of Lan Bentsen Interests for their developmenla called Lynnehaver., located at Haven and Highland Avenues. Because of the significant open space and installation of a significant amount of active recreational facilities and equipment provided, we hereby request a 50* credit toward the parkland fees. Ordinance 105-0 provides that sereral findings must be made by the Punning Commission. For your evaluation I have noted below each finding which must be mode along with our statement of how this requirement has been met: Requirement: (3) That ".lard, c4m� t areas, setbacks, and other areas requirdA to be maintained by the Zoning and Building Provisions of this Cade shall not be included in the computation of private open space. Suggested Finding: 's:he Lynnehaven developme: -t contains a total Open Space Area of 6.95 acres. The Gro;ts site area of 15 acres results in a total of 46,33% open space. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum ni' 3 acres of op--n space to achieve credit. This project contains 5.69 acres of open space not otherwise excluded by setback lines. Within that area is 3.1 acres of qualifying open space, which is called out on the large exhibit provided. This development, therefore, nests the minimum standard set by the Council. Exhibit "A" A California Corporation Q Land Planning and Design 0'; Environmental Analysis 10722 Arrow Route, Suite 616, Rancho Cucamonga, California 917; P (714) 987 -7Q7i �; " v Park Fees Credit Request Lan Bentsen Interests Paga I Requirement: (2) That the private ownership and maintenance of tae open space is adequately provided for by written agreement:. (3) That the use of the private open space is restricted for parc and recreational purposes by recorded covenants which run with the land in favor of existing and future owners Of property within the subdivision and which cannot be changed without Council approval. Suggested Finding. Thy Lynnehaven Development was submitted and approved as a condominium. As such the covenants, codes, and restrictions were submitted to and approved by the Council as a part of the original approval. Thev are now in force. In addition, the State regulates what lead and areas may be used for, along with requirements for maintenance long into the future as a part of the condominium fee structure. This guarantees not only the use, but also the maintenance (and replacement) of community facilities;. Requirement: (4) That the Proposed private (common) open space, is reasonably adaptable Por use for park and recreational purposes, taking into consideration such factors as size, shape, topography, geology, access, and location of private (common) open space. Suggested Finding: The open spaces within the Lynrehaven development are established as essentially separate areas of different character linked by walkways with an overall waterscape theme. There are no very large expanses of clear open space for use (for example) as a soccer field. The open spaces are more useful for passive recreational purposes. For active recreational needs there are a significant nunbe.r of ,recreational features and facilities normally found in public parks. These facilities are list_d below: Total open Space: 6.qS Acres Qualifyirg Open Space: 3.1 Acres Swimming Pools: 3 each Children Wading Pools: _ Z each Spas: 3 each Landscaped. Ponds: 4 each Fountains: 6 each Tennis Courts: 1 each Basketball Courts: 1 each Tot Lots with Equipment: 1 each Clubhouse: 1 earh Laundry Building /Cabana 2 each 11 Park Fee. Credit Request Zan Bentsen Interests Page 3 Requirement: (5) That the facilities proposed° `lor the open space are in substantial accordance with the provisions \, the Recreation and Parks Element of the General Plan for to - City and are approved by the Planning commission. Requirement' (6) That the minims open space for which credit will be considered is three acres and Provide a minimum of four of the eli,entu listed below, csr a combination of such and other recreational inprovements that will meet that specific recreation park needs of thu future residents of the area: Criteria List: A. Children's Plaj-'Apparatus B. Family Barbecue )picnic area C. Game Court Area D. swim Pool with adjacent Deck and ancillary facilities E. Recreation Building Total Requirements: (1 required) (1 provided) (l required) (0 provided *) (1 required) (2 provided) (1 requix2d) (3 provided) (1 required) (3 provided) (4 of above) (9 provided) *The development is a condominium.. occupants are expected to provide their own bar -b -que grills and supplies. The "a -tea" is provided, but there are no permanent facilities installed. Suggested Finding: The 2ecreation Element of the Ge >,erai Plan is found primarily on pages 100 -114 of the General Plan. We believe the required finding above can easily be meta The Lynnehaven development provides more than twice the facilities otherwise required to meet the minimum reimbursement credits. This development provides for active recreation needs of the residents through the provision of a private tennis court, a private basketball/ Vollyball court, three swimming pools, Three spas, two children's wading Poole, a tot lot with play equipment, and a community building, which also includes complete clubhouse /kitchen facilities. In addition to the active recreational facilities the daveloper has landscaped the site using a slater element (ponds, fountains, and streams) to provide for additional passive recreational pleasure of the residents. J 1`, h Request '' Bentsen 4 1� �j the Following Exhibits are Submitted with t-his letter.. I. Rendered Site PjwM showing the approved Landscapp� plan. Set is composed of four (4) mounted, colored prints aW',,a scale of 1"-201. Plant materials arse shown at Mature spread ziid are color coded. Selected photo r-VjPh8 Of the Open spaces, rec-,reatior*al facilities and cozmunit,, buildings, are mounted - on these prints with symbols designating kibcations on the site plans. 2. Site Plan showing the stzek location,'4nd area; of the open space pzoposed for crecUts. On these drawings, the community buildings are also called ant, as are the other recreational facilities. This exhibit consists of one large Print (four prints spliced together). 3. Rendered Details Drawings showing s*lected detail-, ,'of tile pools, fountain areas, open space landscaping, and selected facilities. Set is composed of three (3) mounted, colored prints. Photographs area mounted on these drawings to futt-'-' illyptrate these- amen. :ties. Floorplans and Elevations (three (3) cheats) of the three community buildings. 5. Three sets -of Floorplans and Elevations of tha three (3) Comrunity Buildings constructed for this de,,relopment. 6. one 8} X 11" transparenqy of the large print, as requested. 7. A Detail listing the recreational elements. Park Fees credit Req`.1est Lan Bentsen Interests Pag(m 5 Detail liating of tLrecreation elements. As requested these elements are set out below: 1) Main Community Building/ Clubhouse Brea: 1,496 sq. ft. Rooms: Kitcher., Office, Meeting Room, Walk -in closet /Storage, Math. Rocco, P.estrooms(2) . Furxliture e C 1 white se0tional couch 1 caftee table with 'square glass top 1 white octagonal pedestal table with round glass top 1 white rectangular pedestal table with glass top 2 rectangular desks 1 executive desk 3 matched desk c:h.3ir set 2 matching upholstered che.irs - i credenza 4 matching chairs/ seat cushions a pads. 1 16" sculpture 3 G' tall silk potted plants 3 20" tall silk potted plants Equipment: 2 Brass ceiling grans 2 telephones 1 whirlpool microwave oven 1 whirlpool refrigerator 1 whirlpool electric oven 1 kitchen' ink 1 sharp calculator 1 panasonic typewriter 1 lamp 1 wall sculpture 1 community wall mar., 1 framed picture 1 vending machine Zg Cabani Building /Laundry Aa�aa: 783 square feet Roomms: storage Room, RestrOoms (2), Laundry Rooms Furniture: 1 table Equipment: 1 vending machine 5 washing machines )� 6 dryers �- ± ,ti Park Fees Credit Request Lan Bentsen Interests Page 6 3) Laundry Building .Area: 4203 5q. ft. Roams: Laundry Room Furniture: I Table Equipment: 2 vending maeaines 11 washing machines 5 Dryers 4) Pool Equipment /Restroom Budding Area: 336 sq. ft. Rooms: P901 E-- ,Uipment Storage, Restrooms (2) Fgepment: Pool Ecraipment Paved Patio/Picnic Area: 1,186 sq. ft. (exclusive of Poc - "-)" 5) Pool Equipment /Cart Storage Area: 300 sq.ft. Rooms: Cart Storage, Pool Equipment Equipment: Pool Equipment 6) Tot Lot Area: 40' x 60' = 2,400 sq. ft. Fenced Perimeter for child control Equipment: Timber Playsystems, Type TB/228 with Tire Swing (Mfr. Brochure reproduced attached) 7) Swimming Pool's Cl:_?)house Pools (SWP 3) Swimming Pool 31' x 451 39,450 gall -n cap. Spa Pool 9' dia. 1,244 gallon cap. Pool Furniture: 8 Pool /Picnic Tables 8 Umbrellas 32 chairs for Tables 15 lounge chairs 8 punters Tennis Court Pool (SWP 1) Swimming Pool 41' x 45' 23,065 gallon cap. Family Area Pools: (SWP 2) Swimming Pool 20' x 32' 14,963 gallon cap. iOoddler Wading Pool 10' x 10' 151 gallon cap. Baby Pool 10' x lo' 151 gallon ocn. S. Tennis Court Rej;ulation Doubles Size. Tennis Court Perimeter Fencing Night Lighting R b y C El `c. Park Fees credit ROVest Lan Bentsen Interests Page 7 X\ 9. BaEketball Court/Vollyball 'Court Paved 30, X 60, C, Two (2) regulation height basketball backstops a hqope 1:0. Fountains A Total of Six (6) fountains have been insts:iled 11. Ponds A Total of 1bur (4) pond-is have been donstrla-r,�ad, Pond I (PZTD 1) 20 - x 341 Pond 2 (PND �i) 1071 x 7-141 (varies) with rapids Pond 3 (RND 4) 1091 U 10-331 (varies) with rapids & fountain Pond 4 (PUD 4,NN 311 x 161 with three (3) fountains 12. Open Space Ameai - Area: of Total: Total Site Space: 15.00 acres 100% Total Open Space: 6.95 acres 46.33% Qualifying Open Space- 3.1 acres 4n,6619 The developer has worked hard an exemplary residential arm, with above average recreational and open space facilitid-i. This extra effort has cost a documented total Of $901,992-51 for the landscaping and recreational fde-ilities. Therefore, on behalf of Lan Bentsen Interests I am respectfully reVesting your consideration and approval of a request for 50% credit of the park fees for this project. pow, if any, other developaAnts. within the city will meat the level Of facilities -found here. This development does not merely meet the Cityfs recreation Minimums. The 6Uvelopment exceeds them significantly. For this reason I believe the 5o4; credit should be granted-to this applicant. Respectlill, S mitted, Donal I d G. Xing, tPhD President Charter Member: merican Institute of Certified Planner:; Charter Member.• American Planning Association Associate Member: American Institute of Architects xr d 16.32.010 -- 16.32.020 A. The subdivision as shown on the tentative tract map has the potential for two hundred dwelling units or more if developed to the maximum capacity shown on the adopted general plan or contains Z e hundred acres or more; and, S. The couiipil has previously found that transit services are, or will within a reasonable time be available to such subdivision. (Ord 28 -B X1.608, 1981 ). Chapter 16.32 PARK AND RECREATIONAL LAND Sections: 16.32.010 7- -ktent and general provisions. 16-22 -.— Requirements. 16.32,030 Procedure. 16.32.040 Exemptions. 16.32.010 hltent and general provisions. The intent of the chapter is to provide r' 04 the development of Park and recreational facilities through subdivision regulations, in an area where the nead for residenti.? shall, as a ,use, con- dition to the approval of a tentative`;iap, parcel map, planned cr_mmunity, land development or real estate development, dedi- cate lards or pay fees in lieu ,hereof, or s combination of both, for neighborhood and community park or recreational Purposes. Land to satisfy dea= cation requirements shall be conveyed to the city at the time of recordation of the final man or parcel map.' In lieu fees shall be paid to the city prior to the issuance of build_ng permits. (Ord. 105 -B $1, 1982: Ord. 105 51, 19P0). 16.32.020 Requirements. Land or fees required under this section sha a conveyed or paid directly to the city. ' The city in accepting such lard or fends shall develop the I:and or use the funds as provided in this erection: ' A. Use of Iand and Fees. The land, fees, cr combination thereof are to be used only fcv the purpose of providing park or recreational facilities which will reasonably serve or benefit future residents of such subdivision. a. Establishment and Development V.me. Any fees collected under this chapter shall be committed within five years after the payment of such ::ees or the issuance of ruild- ing permits on one -half of the lots created by the subdivision, whichever occurs later. If such fees are not committed, they shah be distributed and to paid the then record owners of the subdivision in the same proportion that the size of their_ lot bears to the total Area of all lots within tha subdivi,4Cj_h: ,_ f` (Rancho Cucamonga 5/83) 246 -18 Exhibit "B" 0 16, 32.020 C. Lana Disposition. In the event that opportunities for better recreation facilities than those provided by the dedication materialize, the land so dedicated may be sod with the proceeds therefrom being used for suitable park and f( �: that s,ubdi facilities which serve the neighborhooa in which that shbdOnly o�� is located. D. Only a payfhent of fees shall 3e required in sun- I� divisions of less than fifty lots unless agreed otherwise i by the city Council: and the subdivider. E. Standards for Dedication. The amount of land to Be dedicated or the feet/ to be paid shall hear a reasonable relationship to the use of benefits of the park and rec_nat:o facilities by the future residents of the subdivision. The city council establishes a ratio of five park-acres to one thousand population, in accordance with the adopted Park and Recreation Element of th; city's general plan. F. Amount of Park Fees Required. when the requirements of this code are complied with on the basis of providing park fees, the minimum amount of fees to be paid shall be computed by using the following formula: FORMULA: N1, (-6 = minimum feat 1, a minimum- feat N number of proposed dwelling u,iits. S planned park acreage per 1,000 population. P population per dwelling unit an a scale and density set by the responsible public',,agency. L Lairlmitket value of parkland per acre'is represented by the land being subdivided. D average cost per acre to develop park as determined by the public agancy. G. Amount of nand Required. Whenet-er the requirements of this section are complied with on the basis of providing park land, the minimum amount of land required shall be the amount which could be purchased with the fees computed in_ subsection F of this section. H. Parc and Recreational Use Land Fair Market Value. The fair market value shal1 be determined at the time of recordation of the parcel map or final man in accordance with the following criteria: 3 1. The €air market value as determined by the -i::y council; or, 2. If the subdivl'Ier cbjects to such evaluation he may, at his own expense,. obtain an appraisal of the property by a qualified real estate appraiser from the general area approved by the city, wh,,.ch appraisal may be accepted by the j city council if found reasonabl3. I. Combinatior_ of Park Land and Fees 1equired. when a combination of land dedication and in -lieu fee: are 246 -14 (Rancho Cucamonga 5/83) 16.32.03Q X11 required as a condition of approval., the fair market value of the Land to be dedicated, as determined piirsuant to subsection H of this se�;tion, and the in-lieu fees, as comported under subsection F of this section, shall be of an equal value to provision of subsection ;f this section applied to the entire subdivision or planned oommunity. 3. Notwithstatding any o"r provisions in thl..%-chapter to the contrary,, for tentative tuaps and parga» "maps approved or conditionally approved aftar Decesnb::r 31 " j982, the a;:nount: of land dedicated or • fees paid shall lie, :�)ased lapon the residen,ial denssty, which shall be determined'-on the ;oasis of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map or parcel map and the average household size and shall be the proportionate amount necessar�,,to provide three acres of park area per one thousand persons tesiding withiii`such subdi- vision. Far th;) purposes of.-- .adPlyi.ng the formula found in subsection F of this section -to ,such subdivisions, S,.Jquals three and P shall be the average 441"s of each class house- hold within such suk4 vision. if azv�y such `'suhd visi?, con- tzins more than one class of household, a separate a._ipu- tation using the formula in subsection F of thin section shall be made for each class ri household within such sub - division and the minimum fee for the sepanato calculations shall be added to ^et:her to determine the iinimum fee for the subdivision as y whole -for the purpose of determining dedi- cation requirements. (Ord. 105 -B S2, 1982; Ord, 105 S2, 1980). 16,32,030 Prccpd" -e. The requirements of this chapter ba met to the appro,,�al of the final, parcel ;.arY final subdiv$zion map, or the planne& community, or prior to issuance of building permits, by the provision of par2c land in whole or in par:, the payment of a park fee, or by a combination of both as :; equired by the city councils A. i:ity Option. At the time of filing tentative tract map or a minor slz division plat: for approval, the city s:lail determine V,iether dedication of property for park and recreational purposes ar in-lieu of fees 'are necessary. if the city desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted. B. :Action of City. At the time of the tentative tract man approval, the planning commission shall determine as part of such approval, whether to require a dedication of land within the subdivision, payment af a fee in liqu thereof, gr a combination of both. C. Prerequisites for Approval o£ Final Map. Where' dedication it offered and accepted it shall be accomplished to accordance with the previsions of the Subdivisiot'.Map !sot. where fees are required the same shall be depa•Ited,.with the city prior to the issuance of building permits. (Rancho Cucamonga; S/83) 2,x,5 --2II W3 n la <�z.e�a D. Determination. The planning Commission shall de-. termine whether to rey"'re land dedication, require payment - ,ti of a fee in lieu thertiof, or a combination of both, by con - sideration of the col_iawing: 1. Recreational eiiement of the general plan;. and 2. Topography, geology, Access and location oz`lard in the subdivisLan aiII!Anle for .iedi.cation; and ` 3. Size and shape of the subdivision ap�`- ;land available for sub4ivisioe. E. Park and Recreational Use Lane: -- Credit for Private Open Space. Where private open_ space for park and rec; <ea- tional purposes is prcvi.ded in x proposed subdividion,'�1�nd such space is to be privately owned and maintained by the astute residents of the subdivision, such areas may be credited against- not more than f *.'fty percent of the require- went of dedication and developmeiit for park and recreation purposes, as set forth in this section,, "or the payment of f,�es in lieu thereof, as set .forth herein, provided the plar�ing commission finds it is in the public interest to da so, and that the following standards are met: 1. That yard,., court areas, setbacks and other open_ areas required to be r6,yntained,h the toning rind building provisions of the this code shall not b included in the computation of such private open,:: >psce;'•'',and 2. That'tihe private ownership and maintenance of ' the open space is adequately prc-i4ed fo- by written agxee- ment; and 3. That the use of the prioate_"'pen space is re- - stricted for park and recr +jationalfpurp "es by rek=ded covenants *which run with the land li. favox-�of the existing and future owners of property,;within the !-6bdivision azvi which cannot be defeated or eliminated without the consez,,t of the council; and 4. That the proposed private opsn space is rea- sonably adaptable for use for park -and recreational pur-, poses, taking into consideration, svch factors as size; shape, topography, geology, access an4 location of the pri- vate open space land; and S. That facilities p-:Gposed for the o,cen space are in substantial accordance with the provisions Cif the rec- rea';ian and parks element of the general plan for the city and are approved by the ,Ianning commission.; and 6. That the minimum open space for which credit will be considered is three acres and provides a minimum of four of the elements listed- bolow, or a combi=nation of such, and other rt reational,i.mprovemen_ts that will mepp_t the spe- cific recre,iti.on .ark needs of the future residents of the area- Criteria Lisa. a. Children's slay apparatus; r b. Family barbecue picnic area;, c. Gatre court areas 246 -20a Maq -qho Cucamonga . 1, 4) '=! , k 16.32.040 d. Swim, pool with adjacent deck and ancillary fan.ilities; e. Recreation building, The suadivider requ3sting consideration ?or fr -- vate open space credit shall, as part of the submittal fil- ing, include: i. Written request for such consideration by the planning commission; and i.i. Submit de +,ailed plans and specifications for areas oynd improvements,G;ithin such proposed private open space_ The planning commission shall, as an element of th,? review for arivdte open space credit, solicit comments an. recommendations from the park development commission on all such applications.,;' F. Credit for Private Open Space -- planned Communities. Where privata open space for park and recreational purposes is provided in a planned community and portions,f or all such space is to be privately owned and maintained by the future residents of the planned community or publicly dedi- cated and maintained by a special assessment district, cred- it against the requirement cf dedicatioq for park and rec- reational purposes, as set forth in Section 16.32.02OG shall be determined through the adoption of the planned community text; provided, however, that the park standard for the planned community is the same as f -r any other development and that the planning commission finds it is in the public interest to do so, and that the standards for private opc.a space, as set forth in Section 16.32.030E, are met. G. Plannei developments and real estate developments as defined in Sections 11003 and 11003.1, respectively, of the Busin+.ss and Professi6ns Code, shall be eligible 'moo re- ceive a credit, in an amount determined by resolution of the city council, against the amount of land required to be dedicated, or the amount of the fen imposed, pursuant to this chapter, for the value of private open space within the development which is usabl:, for active recreational uses. Tris subsection shall a ^=;ly only.'to planned developments and real estate developments for which tenative maps or parcel maps are approved or conditionally approved after December 31, 1982. The credit allowable pursuant to this subsection shall, if applied for, be in lieu of any other credit allow- able under other provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 105 -B 53, 1982; Oa .. 105 =A 51, 1980; Ord. 105 53, 1980). 16.32.040 Exemptions. 'rhe provisions of this chapter do not apply to commercial or industrial subdivisions; nor do they apply to condominium projects which consist of the subclivisio^ of airspace in an existing apartment building which is more than five years old when no new dwelling units are added. (Ord. 105 54, 1980). (Rancho Cucamonga 246 -20b 12184) � {� LI i i AREAS FOROVEN SPACE. C O N S W ERATIO N' RECREATION ELEMENTS OT LOT L AREA SPOOL P a POOL T AREA j{ GCUN , �' y��'ON Exhibit "C" V —/ _. DP,TE :. TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO GUCAM014CTA STAFF REPORT November 25, 1987 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Associate Planner �r _Cx (At_ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -47 LINPRO r, e development of a acre. Indust-ri-al master plan - co�lisisting of a mixed use of multi - tenants, manufacturing and research and development projects within a 3 block area of a previously approved master plan; and Ph-9se I development consisting of 5 multi- tenant buildings totaling .80,200 square feet in Block 1, 8 manufacturing buildings totaling 94,900 square f�zt Id Block 2, and 3 research and development buildings totaling 511,816 square feet in Block 3, in the;'Industrial Park District, Subarea 16, located at the noeJiwest corner of 4th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 210 - 062 -02, 11, 15, 26, 32 and 33. I. PROJECT AND S,TE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the 43.85 acre master plan, e aa�1Te se pTaan and elevatiols for Phase I development of 17.6 acres'.-?Id issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. ,,.surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - vacant, Existing Siff Family Homes; Industrial Park District, Subarea 16, Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant, Apartments; City of Ontario East - Frito -Lay Distribution Center; General Industrial, Subarea 5 !Vest - Cucamonga Creek, City of Ontario C. General Plan Designations: ro ec a — Industrial Park North - Industrial Park, Lose Density Residential (2 -,?4 dwelling units per acre) South - Not Available, City of Ontario E.st - General Industrial West - Cucamonga Creek, City of Ontario C ITEM E I� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT PEiIEW 87 -47 - LINPRO November 23, 1987 Page 2 D. Parking Calculations: `Number of ``Vumber of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Phase I eve opment: Block I° 4 Multi - tenant 8C,200 1/400 201 287 Buildings Block 2 8 Industrial 94,900 I /596 190 201 Manufacturing Buildings Block 3 { 3 Research A 61,816 1/350 177 277 Development Buildings Total 558 765 E. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and vegetation consists of ecay ng vineyards. Located at the corner of 4th Street and Archibald Avenue are approximately 2 Mature Palm trees and four other identified mature trees. This corner is also designated as a primary gateway to the City. Ii. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed project is part of ttte previously approved 78 acre master plan by Lusk Company. The developer, Linpro Company, is taking over this master plan and is proposing a more precise master plan for 43.85 acres of the 78 acres including Phase I development as shown in Exhibit "D2 ". The developer is not proposing any changes to Blocks 4 and 5 of the master plan north of Street "B" and west of Street "A" as shown in Exhibit "D2" However, blocks 1 and 2, which are located north of 4th Street, west of Archibald, will consist of integrated development rather try n the individual development of a lot sale program formerly proposed. Block 3 will have a mixture of lot sales program development and integrated development. With Phase I development, the developer is proposing to develop the necessary infrastructure, such as streets and drainage facilities, including perimeter street landscaping for both interior,�md exterior streets. , I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DOELOPMENT REVIEW 87-47 - LINPRO November, 25, 1987 Pap 3 B. t,esi n Review Committee: Tht Committee (Blakesley, C41tiea, Rr,nu originally reviewed the proposal on October 8, 1987. !�L `that time. the Committee raised the following concerns and recihnended that the developer revise the plans to be submitted for'�'further Committee review: 1. The applicant should work with staff to resolve the site plan and landscape design issues as mentioned in the October 8, 1987 staff report. The Committee stated that the master site plan concept is generally acceptable. 2. The proposed architecture does not meet the intent of the design guidelines.. The reason being that the style is too clean"and crisp and does not provide sufficient articulation in building plane and surface. 3. The proposed signage and /or project entry marker does not provide for compatibility to the City's approved gateway sign. The developer has worked diligently with staff in revising the site plan and elevations to address the concerns of the CoTaittee. On November 5, 1987, the Committee (8lakesley, Chitiea, Kroutil) reviewed the revised plans and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. The triangle sky lights should be of tinted vision glass and not reflective glass. 2. The screen wall for the people places should be tapered or staggered In height. 3. Division glass should be of darker greenish tint. Full samples should be submitted for City Planner review and approval, 4. The reveal detail should be of substantial size and subject to City Planner, review and approval. 6. The applicant should contieue to work with staff in resolving all the site plan and landscape design issues. (Staff has reviewed the revised site plan and landscape plan and determined that, they have addressed most of the concerns. For'' those,_items that they have not revised to address the concerns, they have been placed as conditions Of approval as stated in the attached Resolution). 6'3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DEPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW' 1.7-47-- `LINPRO November 25, 1987 Page 4 D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Envi ronmen a ec s Ind has found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. Further, each indjvidual parcel development of phase development would require a separate environmental assessment to assure that no accumulative adverse environmental impacts would occur. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: . The proposed project is consistent with the objectives or e anc�ral Plan and Industrial Specifi,:' Plan, and the purpos s of the district in which the site is located. The proposed use, together with the building design and site plan is in ccmpliance with each of the applicable provis.�ans of the Industrial Specific Plan and the Development Code. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety ow- welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve eve opawnt Review 87 -47 and issue a Negative Declaration. 4Res ull omitted , ner BB :NF:te Attachments: Summary DeW — pment Table for Phase I (3) Exhibit "A "'- Location Map _ Exhibit "3" - Previously Approved Master Piar. by Lusk Co. Exhibit "C" - Master Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape Master Plan (2) Exhibit "E" - Block One and Detail Site Plan Exhibit "F" - Block One Conceptual Grading Pla;i Exhibit "G" - Block One Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "H" - Block One Elevations Exhibit "I" - Block Two Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "J" Block Two Conceptual Grading Exhibit "K" - Block Two Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "L" Block Two Elevations Exhibit "M" - Block Three Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "N" Block Three Conceptual Grading Exhibit 40" - Block Three Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "P " -,- Block Three Elevations Exhibit "Q "'- Landscape Cross Sections Exhibit "R" Landscape Treatment at Sheets A & B Intersections Exhibit "S" - Enlargements of Open Space /Plaza 40 0 {JCA •2 Ic �$ PH&W I Block No. Ir Multi- Tenant PANT If UNIFORM APPLICATION NOS _- ESiDENTIAL P;ROJEOT SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT TABLE Project Name cornerpointe Reference File No.: Location NW quadrant of 4th St., and Archibald (Staff Use Only) General Plan Sndustrial Development District : Sub Area 16 PROJECT AREA Gross (incl. aroma to centerline of abutting streets): acres: 7.87 Net (exclusive of dedication for major external and secondary streets): acres: 6.87 AREA DISTRIBUTION (Rand on Not Arne) ,R►ORESIS®. FT. a/o OF NET AREA Building Coverage 80,200 s.f.16487 Acre..; 27% Landscapa Coverage 58,953 s.f. 20% Veh' -blar Area (incl. parking): 159,997 s.f. 53% FLOOR AREA DISTRIBUTION BY PROPOSE USE(Basad on Not Area) Area of Building Pad No. of Stories Gross Floor Area (sq. ft.) Proposed Use Building 2.1 1 28,112 Multi--Tenant Building 1.2 1 13,880 Building 1.3 2 12,768 Building 1.4 1 25,440 80,200 TOTAL s.f. Phase I PARKING Type of Use Parking Ratio # of Spaces Required # of Spact )vide Multi- Tenant 11400 201 287 Note: All Blocks were designed in their entirety. Therefore, separate Phase I calculations may reflect inexact building coverage and may show additional parking which is slated for future phases. Total No. of Parking Spaces Required: 201 Total No. of Parking Spaces Pr6 > "ded: 287 No. of Compact Spaces 31 % of Compact Space to Total Space : 21% e-5 %9 AAft Y ' r zi o PART 11 UNIFORM APPLICATION c- ? Q& Pgasa r NON - RESIDENTIAL PROD W? lock No. 21 ��� StIMMARY DEO/ELOPMEti'dT TABU% Project Name cornerpbznte, Phase s Reference File No.: Location NW quadrant 4th St., and Archibald Ave-(Staff Use Only) General Plan Industrial DevG,'.,,,^+ZleW District: Sub Area 16 PROJECT AREA Gross (incl. area to centerline.: E!;butting streets): acres: 6.5 Net (exclusive of dedication for major external and secondary streets): acres: "5.2 AREA DISTRIBUTION (Based on Net Ares) ACRESISCI. FT. % OF NET AREA Building Coverage 94,900 s.f. 15.2 acres 32% Landscape Coverage : 40,916 s.f. 14% VehicLiar Area (incl. puking): 163,334 if. 54% FLOOR AREA DISTRIBUTION BY PROPOSE USE (Based on Not Area) Area of Building Pad No. of Stores Gross Floor Area (sq. ft.) Proposed Use Building 2.1 1 14,,000 s.f. Industria Building 2.2 1 11,000 s.f. Building 2.3 1 ?1,000 s.f. Building 2.4 1 14,000 s.f. Building 2.5 1 12,500 s.f. Building 2.6 1 9,950 s.f. Building 2.7 1 9,950 s.f. Building 2.8 1 12,500 s.f. - PARKING 94,900 s.f. TOTAL Type of Use Parking Patio 'of Spaces Required #of Spaces Provided Industrial 1/500 190 201 Note: All Blocks were designed in their entirety. Therefore, separate Phase I calculations may reflect inexact building coverage and may show additional parking which is slated for future phases. Total No. of Parking Spaces Required: 190 Total No. of Parking Spaces Provided: 201 No. of Compact Spaces 56 °l of Compact Space to Total Space : 28x / 4, PSJlSk' r Bloch No. 3: R&D PART It UNIFORM APPLICATION NON - RESIDENTIAL PROJECT R MMARY DEVELOPMENT TABLE Project Name Cornerpointe, Phase .i ReWrance File No.: 'Lunation NN quadrant 4th St., and Archibald Avl-�Staff Use Only) General Plan . Sndustrial Development District: ' -,, Area 16 PROJECT AREA Gross (Incl. area to centerline of abutting street,%: acres: 5.31 Net (exclusive of dedication for ma;or external and s6 ond2!y streets): acres: 5.56 ARE�"r DISTA113UTION (tlawd on Not Area) ACRESISD. FT. °!e OF NET A Building Coverage 61,816 s.f.15.56 acres 26% Landscape Coverage 33,017 s.f. 14% Vehic liar Area (Incl. parking): 147,361 s.f. 60% FLOOR AREA DISTRIBUTION BY PROPOSE USE (Based on Net Arne) Area of Building Pad F., of Stories Grossi:loor Area (sgt-'ft.) Proposed Building 3.1 1 18,672 s.f. R&D Building 3.2 1 28,672 s.f. Building 3.3 1 24,472 s.f. 61,816 s.f. TOTAL PARKING Type of Use Parking Ratio a of Spaces Required # of Spaces Proti R &D 11350 177 277 Note_ A22 Blocks were designed in r':ntirety. Therefore, separa` a Phase S calculations may reflect inexact. bull ding coverage and may show additional I,". :king wh< h is slated for future phases.. Total No. of Parking Space, Required. Total No. of Parking Sp" Provtdad; Nr .or ompacG `o$re &'a WI rf Cornpact SA YS td ri5t {Space: 177 277 44 �sx s MATH CITY Or �!� ICI a' y' C T +' s MATH CITY Or �!� ICI a' �Y CI'T'Y CF " AM 0 THE KMTH 1j.-T �kr FL f i F A 7/te ��} f \\ }�j _. \. 3 7%910'« IWN f 1� r �� /� \� = � �; �t �`�\ ��2�|! -4- { ...�� � r(�y •r i f t Icr C e ace�et�e � a i r, c�c s c'ce•re , t- -` C, _ G O � �''�c.• arc.:. - _-�'. •. C CHEER ------------ i 1 'T „yam. i s t A H11 NO +�nr mw t 1 2 Y E � . � r � 1 ` y r G i $ y t 777 ! IIIJJJ _ c _ -4- E• i _ t �%�rVl _- t v i ♦ .......... 1 P a it •_._. --cam IF i �— a / 2 r- - - -��\ \ \� �. � \ [\ � [� ^�! (� ( . ...._ _ . . . .�� . ay .g . � � \ . ».` \ . <� Q \ ���) �. ^` � � ° .: °j - � - - - -� . . :/ �������~ 4 . , �/ . . - � ay. ` . � ; «< - \ / � � q � §!� / -, 2 � # � �� }k� . � §K�(§ / . . _ , ( © • § ^ �. � . \��� ) � • � � ! $ � 9 � § « ■.! $ ^ � t } / g ���-� � { � \ ©� ! �. . \ . /� :�� \� � . , � ` �� . � : \ . £. � � � j§� « � � , \ . .d � \ / . , l.t��--.. � : d. • � .� ,! !�, \ . �� _ ; � ,A ! | �. ! , .ƒ $ k / »� I \ > . � � | � # # : / , � � � � � $!G % t ��: � .\� ��\ � � !� `� � . ��; . � ��z , \\� - \ _ { . � � . � ! . . . �.\ � \ . � i � ° � % � � % . ! ° � � § � ' � . 4 � � . , � (` ! � � \ /} } . \ . , � <: f ff ED rn ma Lo r .ti i F 1 I H ' _ } 3 I mr z < e r I _ ` r .-1 ppp t-r u� 17 < e� p - ICZA i tt � i } 1 ( L 3 l � Jk EN 1 3 rr'1 OE- �. ' rr- a. i +; &1 4 LM F ` ^^® 1 1. Y N 'u 9 C: OQ t Li t -Kt' oil J O CJ wa v t �� ♦ 1. 4 � ( : r \/ � • � . . . �. a_ . ..] j§ < / , � � � •� � \� ° ) ��.. . . _. . .. ` k } ^\ ~ - � � \ §k. §| . <: \ $}; > . . �} • �Sf ?�..... .. .. .. . J�&� .. r \/ F a _ a x t i - i[ Y I I 4 e i� o *Lm . } • i ; w O a x� ��To P Lit f..., i At I F-2' .- ' y y.,�l.!_r � , � � 3 i � . 5 i �! . _ t . - � � w.+u .a•+N ][nrtly. w+>i _.. i all IL r if. l 1 ` � � j ` I � �� #•�' 3 � � .. , " i (n � riri t t3Vi�i.7,.i�� � �~+ !'i• r � • � �'- � = . r^ �... ., -.. ,a `. �` -_ t ��_.�•� rte. �� Y YF `� -' �' '�\ �y e_ tt i 0701 -02 o 1.1- 25' -87 PC' Agenda 2 m 1 1 1 { W ❑ ITE NN tII II 11' #0 E BE. 3 f I i _s• r 1 Io i w e I U tiG ?x y _ a { i t � 1 t ' S L I 1 ' 1 ! t 1 0 7 E3 i o 7 1, - 'A a � I II I r � n V Y h - 'A F r h +7 � ` a s _ x _ _ of r � . ti �I w r— K 3 Lg CE IE c9 � � x= 1 "a_ r k� i a i d ` s a - 33i a !: it O ` I : =_ �1 f I 1 I 1 i L_ 0 1, 1 i:0 :lay s I� Il If. li If 1, xjati I I C-30 Il s. MW A . /( . im HUS z. of ij /dofi --I i : {$�j Sil 2 a;. rap LL, Lh i NIP1 F-r" `: t 1 ti=r=q I• u y i E-32- I. 3i a. 11 { V v 1 �p r o ZE ?Wk. I 33 Ail milli CE 40 id a ILI k. xk CE 40 id a ILI k. ,ql - - | , . . > � • . � ! Q at i �--} £ 1 4 •� 1 �� � i ra;� i las SS m Q ti 741r �a�ad tia sue, a lip; CT i j� { 1 k .s � 11 �►ii 4 r t � ;4 r �o 3 LA Ol rt IS, `a RESOLUTION NO. 87 -151 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPRr SING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER NUMBER 10393 :. WHEREASr, Tentative Parcel Map Number 10393; submitted by Keith /Lusk Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 33 parcels, the tool Property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Califk7raia, identified as APN(s) 210- 062 -13, 11, 02, 26, 33, 32, located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and FmTth Street; and WHEREAS, on August 26, 1987, the Planning Commission held a -duly advertised public hearing for the above- described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANgO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CO'MISSION RESOLVED AS !' ".LOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistea'. Keith the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. s. the site is physicalxy suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial env,,ronmental damage, public health problems or have alverse affects on abutting property. subject Sot 77 attached Standard Cc adi tern No. and 103,23 he following approved :'andi ti ons: SpzPial Condisions 1. OVERHEAD UTILITIES: a. Archibald Avenue , An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding .;f the existing overhead utilities (telecoimmunicati'on and electrical, except For the 66KV electrical) on the opposite side of 'except Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to recordation of the final :nap. The fee sn449 be one -half the adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Fourth Street to the north boundary of Parcel 33. b. Fourth` Street - The existing overhead utilities (electrical, bxcept for the 66 KV electrical) on he project side of Fourth Street, including the. 30rvice line to the south side of Fourth 6S,- J P,ESOLUTION PAGE 2 Street, shall be undergrounded from the first pale on the east side of Archibald Avenue to the first pole on the west side of Cucamonga Creek Channel, prior to public impi-ovement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement ixF one -half the adopted cost of undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is not feasible because the property is in the City of Ontario. E 2. In order to retain the optiun Tor m tue. access points for adjacent parcels, an easement for mutual access r-hall hd place: or. the Parcel Map. -�* easement Shall be 30' in width, e4,and 64' onsite from the street ri�i t -of -way line, and be centered a the common property line between adjacent parcels. The requirmei.c ;a use the mutual access easement shall be decided during the Development Review process for each parcel. The first parcel to develop shall construct the drive approach full width. 3. Additional dedication shill be provided on the Final Map to the Satisfaction of the City Engineer for the following: a. a southbound right turn lane nn Archibald Avenue from 'B" Street to Fourth Street; b. an additional Vestbound lane on Fourth Street from 'A' Street to Archibald Avenue; and C Entry Monument sign and related landscaping. 4. jvsrrutt a right turn lane on Archibald Avenue frrn 18' Street to , ourth St :•eet. S. jhe developer shall obtain a corner cutoff easement for the northeast corner of 'A' Street and 'C' Street 6. Notice of intention to form and /,; join the lighting and landscaping district shall be filed with the City Council pr;'or to recordation of the map or issuance of buildting permit, whichever occurs first. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR / r 8Y: "rI LarrY T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: r _ er e y Acre ary „" RESOLUTIGN PAGE s I, Rrad ",uller. Deputy .Se ary of the PI-inning Cmmission of the City of ` Rancho Cucamonga,. 10 homey certify thbt th'e foregoing Rwsolutim was duly and ? regularly irttv&zid, passed, and adop�ed by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucw*nga, at a regular „leeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of August, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: " E5s COWISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIM, 6LAKESLEY, MCNI£L NOES: CUMMISSrONERt: NONE ASSENT: CCAMISSIORERI TOLSTOY 3 i �7 A d s g V V t 21 N Y ` w ire =l ;it 2 != a m YA za !!rr Y }} 6 r jig tic �a gjj�yy �6 4 a � w I ���X1 I �I ., I I Se it s. V r $t g a i2P 5. O ® zr it j e . a� ** a s S 44S i as s N ��� � �� • ` � bs� �r :i ii a i �aap JS or M N r may+ Y iF K Yj Y w h 4' ., I I Se it s. V r iWp O y a i2P 5. O ® zr it j e . a� 31 s as N ��� � �� • ` � bs� N { d ., I I i. '•+ 4 � 4 �,� V u N y� �� � O Ua ��$ y�JJ�RFrry� �yp R « L 4 q O r 4 C N is „ � v H Y �. K y M ■� Y9 V y s d 4. d _ Mi{ A s.: J3 y�ii� agir 'efV� ` g f e! Oe! }y My+�yy� i s Yg�g� V1c3 � ` 4Y� � Vuq iii F ZI 21 " nit M S Y 3 • a � A r J4 aa... ACS W® 1 Y1 e =r= M �cw �lV y.A 4 M a N r s M � O R 1 R « L 4 q O r 4 C is „ � v 2 Ris n isr9 ¢¢ w "v A 'itI 21 " nit M S Y 3 • a � A r J4 aa... ACS W® 1 Y1 e =r= M �cw �lV y.A 4 M s M � O v N b +a R « w O r++ is ¢¢ w "v #H 'itI f e! `y }y r RESOLUI6N NO. ARES&UTION OF °;THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION a€�PkOitl OE.:OPMENT REVIEW N0. H7 -47 FOR THE DEVELO ENT pF A 43.$5 ACRE INAUSTRIAL MASTER PLAN CONSiS '-NG QF A MIXED USE OF MULTI- TENANTS, MANUFACTURING AND R aEARCH AN0 D£YELQPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN A 3 BLOCK ARER OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MASTER PLAN, AND PHASE I DEVELC�Pt£HT CONSISTING OF FIVE MULTI - TENANT BUILDINGS 70TALING 80,200 SQUARE FEk'i IN BLOCK I, EIGHT MANUFACTURING BUILDINGS TOTALING 44,900 SQUARE FEET IN BLOCK 2, AND THREE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BUILDINGS TOTALING 61,816 SQUARE FEET IN BLOCK 3, 1NTHE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, SUBAREA 16, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4TH STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE - APH 210-062 - 02, 11, 15, 26, 32 AND 33 A. Recitals, (i) The Linpro Company has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 87 -47. as describes!.. in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 25th 'of November, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) A17 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW. THEREFORE, .it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part At, of ti'.- :Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based -=Apon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- reforeaced meeting on November 25, 1587, including written and oral staff re,ort, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: 0 ) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Archibald Avenue with a street frontage of 3,250 feet and lot depth of 1,300 feet and is presently unimproved; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south of that site consists of apartments, the property to the east is industrial, and the property to the west is the Cucamonga Creeks and A, / Y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIOM NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -57 K LINPRO November 25, 1987 Page 2 P] (c) The site plan design complies with the design guidelines and standards of the Industrial Specific Plan in providing plazas with pedestrian amenities and convenient pedestrian liffkage3 throughout the sate; and (d) The elevations comply with the design guidelines of the industrial Specific Plan in providing sufficient articulation in building plane and surface. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presentad to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting dA upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 A-tve, this Commission hereby finds and conclude., as follows: (a) That the proposed Dfoject is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan: and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code, the Industrial Specific Plan. -and the purposes of the district in which :7,4 -tite is located; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Specific Plan; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially: vrious to properties or improvements in the vicir•ity. _ a- This Commission hereby finds,'and certifies that the project has been reviewod and considered in compliance with the California Envi'ronmertal ft, Zl t_v AC*` of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions and Resolution No. 87 -151 attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: Master Plan (1) The master plan 3.s approved in concept only. All future development for each parcel, each y phased or block development shall be subject to PLANNING C t1$SWM REM UTION NO. DEVELOPMEXT RLVIEN 9'14i a LINPRD _._November 25, 1987 cPage 3 a separate Dexci®pnent A�;eview process for Planning Commission approval. Modifications to the master plan shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. (2) The proposed uses within the future phase are not part of this approval, (3) The developer shall dedicate an easement, in sufficient size of an area as;;determined by the City Engineer anti City Planner, for the major, gateway monument identity sign to be' built by the City at the interse ctin�� r i a' - Avenue and 4th Street7t�e d�"v 0 r a coordinate landscr.4d9t with the City's teautification project. (4) Textured pavont such as exposed aggregate with p-icrete ,banding or brick pavers, sr materials' as japjwoved by the City Planner shall be provided at .all project entrances, across circulation aisles, `and within, plazas or "people places.'. Samples of such textured pavement shall be submitted for Planning Division review aid approval prior to issuance of building penaitt. (5) The final (esign of the perimeter landscape streetscape along 4th Street, Archibald Avenue, Streets "A ", "8 ", "C", and "F" shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. (6) The applicant shall continue the street and landscape improvements of Street "F" until it ,joins with Street "B". (7) Blocks 3 and 4 of the lot sales program shall be subject to the master plan guidelines of DR 86-37. (8) The proposed groun&,over (turf) for the perimeter streetscape shall have a moisture sensor, tensionmeter or other similar equipment installed for water conservation. Such equipment shall be subject to City Planner review and approval. r { PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-47 - LINPRO November 26, 1987 Page 4 Block one (1) Any "fencing provided along the entire property Lounawy abutting the Cucamonga Creek shall be Of decorative material consistent with the architectural style. (2) A pedestrian connection shall be provided along the entire circulation spine in the middle of Block one. The proposed pedestrian connection shun on the detidled site plan shall be relocated to thr `- 'planter area - along the buildings. - (3) Additional trees shall be provided along the building perimeter that faces° the street frontage for Buildings 1.4, 1.5, 1.1 and 1.8. (4) Additional landscaping such as increased number of trees, specimen size trees, appropriate shrubs and groandcaver shall be provided along the entire frontage of proposed Street "B". (5) The northwest corner of the site of the future: phase development shall be landscaped with trees, groundcover and shrubs. (6) The landscaping at the southwest corner of the site in the futurs; phase developmeA shall be designed to integrate with the San Bernardino County Flood Conti-61 District landscaping. // (7) The same -accent trees shall be utilized tit the project entrance of 'Street "S". J Block Two (1) Additional pedestrian amenities sF��17 be provided for plazas between suildinO',2.2 and 2.3 and between Buildings 2.6 and 2.7 y; (2) Centralized plaza arealopen space with pedestrian amenities shall be provided for future 8 phase development between Buildings 2.7 u IN (3) All screert walls an# site boundary walls shah be of the same-= materiall as- the build material. �� 4/`% PLANNUG COt ±i S Fi [ifiSOB:tTTT6N DEVEi QPMENI �� �A�4�' - LIHPRO November 25, 1987' Page 5 (4) Additional trees including specimen size trees and accent trees shall be provided along the street frontage around Block Two which is 4th Streets Street "A", Street "C ", Street "F" and Street "B ". D. Architecture For Phase I Development (1" The trai n gular sky lights shall be of *t'ed t vision glass rnd not reflective glass. (2) v a screen wall f o the peopl'e places shall be 4� erect or staggered in height. The final ` sign shall be subject to City Planner review grid approval prior to issuance of building �pet� it. (3) w, /Oe vision glass shai,l be- of a darker greenish t%',, . Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuake of building permit. (4) The reveal details shall be of substantial s,ze and subject to City Planner review and epproval 0 EngW-rla,4 Division (1) All Tnertinent ct ditions of-- Parcel Map 10393 shall apply as stated in attached Resolution No. 87 -151. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSIGN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. 14cNiel, Chalrman ATTEST• arad Buller, Deputy secretary C i w. PLAT+ ING COMISSIQN R-ML't ON W, OEVELOWIENT REVIEW 87-47 w 1ZNpAQ November 25, 1987 Page 6 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Swetary of the Punning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and ,adapted by the Planning Cvpmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of NovQ'or, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COWISSIONERS: NOES; C"ISSIONERS: ABSENT': C"ISSIONERS: a � r v I n V � O .NwigoYa 'a�. s�Q�� ��`o wcNuw C� C �� O■ N Y� �.� A C A N = =ypp�o4 i'Qw �C�C p ±Sat atN Uo���6 =sA «- �3 Hg« V � ~ tl � � � � � tl w VRIi CM ���C� TS• tap V>> J Vy w.v .� +V Y� fuY' N4 8��y€ 3 �gyS� WylN � ^* jY' gr p N C. a .. ynN, r �V` Y 6 �+ � « CV 6 c tl�w M� �Qj 3 y'�� «■ µO01 � a +� ��� =Y yw 03�u'�P� Nw«SVwO NNCCS � � dlV{,, w�v.@ Y��iaS[T. Vt3a .� .i 6Nw a N •� My �LYVCYw>, } sNjw\a p Via Y s �yygT\ LL V Y:ii S�V S�Y� E r W HUI L � a � r v I n V � O .NwigoYa 'a�. s�Q�� ��`o wcNuw C� C �� O■ N Y� �.� A C A N = =ypp�o4 i'Qw �C�C p ±Sat atN Uo���6 =sA «- �3 Hg« V � ~ tl � � � � � tl w VRIi CM ���C� TS• tap V>> J Vy w.v .� +V Y� fuY' N4 8��y€ 3 �gyS� WylN � ^* jY' gr p N C. a .. ynN, r �V` Y 6 �+ � « CV 6 c tl�w M� �Qj 3 y'�� «■ µO01 � a +� ��� =Y yw 03�u'�P� Nw«SVwO NNCCS � � dlV{,, w�v.@ Y��iaS[T. Vt3a .� .i 6Nw a N •� sNjw\a p �yy s iCMf+w++ LL V r W COG L � • V O��Yp•V 1�N0 i �N� � 3 yr r� ±uT �'pL �•«• V y r+ Vp V Q M w tl N Ep by� '� atl~ "/l 4 A FAAT�i�Ni S1r °z 3W a � QQ r $N�y� vo »� yu' Yy G � C �'V N y Wa y � O 3n � 13ayN. 13. V�M cY� a.. 4 N ±ww 8 �X� �ppN p O N u� s3 " Y��YY. ^1�11"O ti ti y I I I L '`3jj p3 ��.M ■dL��pl. �Lb"1$ a t � �� .. n Mw PY }��0`1N O• Y� "+b' L N =';111 S�p�S °� �eM yS!iw 93 �3. till i TL Luz Hat C V � 4 y r C C � :s M y p CS Y r fl� M r O C �� « M" YYC6YN AYl1L< to 81 G'- 66 MM M MN law Y YY id °ri. -r gCyi1 M C1. 6L n 11 N �Nl�r Mr GSZi N�•�pL N��.�O V y aLi +i (R � ••L• N� �`p 1N�7iC ��� ,C .� p �w i. ��nt ay. � ■'� {C� Ct C :r� "a 09 �y ~CIV 2L sg W It S+°$- g ad 721 "y�rdj�MSy$c��c's�r.4 uL��iuL�� N T H^ Ili W Y O1 gM V C3 i yC i-0 IC 2 r1 C Ow. C CC V ~ _yL� � yV NyM Y "ti wil flop q[Ns h�1L.1rK Gi °I �O CC Y M n Y 'il i N H u � iwC J+� iiw L "Lw •_� V O 2 p C L ww d yqi 4 "�C y p ayy�'' r O �L "y i VL 01S ° 4 dL K11. G r> MN. 1 to � t m a. L '`3jj p3 ��.M ■dL��pl. �Lb"1$ a t � �� .. n Mw PY }��0`1N O• Y� "+b' L N =';111 S�p�S °� �eM yS!iw 93 �3. till i TL Luz Hat C V � 4 y r C C � :s M y p CS Y r fl� M r O C �� « M" YYC6YN AYl1L< to 81 G'- 66 MM M MN law Y YY id °ri. -r gCyi1 M C1. 6L n 11 N �Nl�r Mr GSZi N�•�pL N��.�O V y aLi +i (R � ••L• N� �`p 1N�7iC ��� ,C .� p �w i. ��nt ay. � ■'� {C� Ct C :r� "a 09 �y ~CIV 2L sg W It S+°$- g ad 721 "y�rdj�MSy$c��c's�r.4 uL��iuL�� N T H^ Ili W Y O1 gM V C3 i yC i-0 IC 2 r1 C Ow. C CC V ~ _yL� � yV NyM Y "ti wil flop q[Ns h�1L.1rK Gi °I si VY O a 024_1 Z V pap �+ �yt L.Lq U '. 1/ Na V „ Q6 aC iW^ I�`C3` CY�.py L ai w T _ to Zw. %+'a. -. .''L'�� �w��o.�_. 0 ^y'.YYyyaMY 'Q N Q Od r 'p O N y Y p i . .+Y�sI��r +1 .A`aDa +l Y aa gPCCa wC' _iY01OMN{O p� , M,«c94R ■ jtQ.�L ViY . r Z. 4 a p1xg r H3 L. QN 23 �vy�rs ps 0 L G N Y V Yja ei6yLp V r ••G1^RM y Y 3 1N$ �SL y1L ua� �+ _pI N L ^ ySNOa6 OUb 'riON '$ os 8. 3 ^ +�^ OI.C. � �� �M� N ���NN���1N �@ Q..M�t:y'y ■N. +y, q.« y�� 4 4 ; !.-at M6 $ pQ p r G �YP aal }` Y. y. «^ Y L M N It Sri =SN- .tpr^ C E kill C v KN u�.a.. b.f PS.^ilG !+l ^Y6 i[y Y.OAOM YL !� . Y'C' a7w� a6ga YY uuy11.;66 y■ �Y NM N "Y i1 p16N Y °OlV. y ^H-.S ilk `YM7 Ct¢1 �e SLgw y�C �L�pa�er_ �1' T^ q 1 q N f � � 3 p1�L � 6 Cf yl 4 ^pp ��L F� �Q Ys Y @7^ �V 2l -91 iq 1]VI `n W *'1+Ni 1—, YW 6�pk aNW^ 9C .=..Y O p 4 V y X.CY i1C ~� C°Rp �1 `+•CgC6i Mud` �4Y� ud C a° wLi rM 4 �L 0,6pC16. q-x ay}� YZ-Z vl..g �a►•Y -Ci'. � `fir c$.+. n� r8 °: a ;r.,,, iLda �'.x ��.��+�� Y%.`gsg�? c• pi.'S ++a. vy�.- ar GNpS� YX° y y�Cp > � gY C41 „w Cl �X ^C �.61yVa�CN N Oy�1 w � 1c. =GyY{w EY a.. a. qNV LONwM C �Y° ijy1 q�� C Y ^Lq S uLM N.M . y LL ANN ° °ai Lea .a N 1 S L V Si U Y .�� �g�r�. ' $acs o,�+a� wekaa:,eS+C 21' ?` C yI w - .1 ^w L M t� :9110-1 v - yyV K•QT YQ V 0^NY S y� fyYy Yf`i Y TV= Chu mm •0� if tl4 wMN- VCI N q0. C L 4�•4 11�V� LNi• j .,�a.0 CLR L�rNN• � Y VY � wC 4py �VLV �av qmw p cCc eGS+ p,S S� 10� _i.�wAt�t�N�+ poi _ alt C'.uu.0 pp c Cycw r`� NY N +y +yyL y� w u ^w =V1 ��irY ��it« °qLi lo�e� ~wa � M •° oa�i ^3 '�I4'a.g N 'Y� ■Ci �. Ili II9y Y11s +pQ�yfl�?Y O w�_i?N Ty My y. �LpG p, V diL Yy VQCI �` �i B`i La�i��e G �V. +1ia? L Vi st w L ma w L Y �, a N i L L.�• Q O P _N V t ... NN M it.g f� N CV N V � Y � d vi N D Y`• xx Wt S V ee t� ~ Or i N N O �p is G F V w g1b'm iY L o A "Ly ^w 6 N u > ii F N n4K 6 A3`�yY 1Ot'8Y y Y V 111$¢ L G� N� N � w V A C V q �Y � X Y V uu R O p a N ^ N M Y p1 > O N ttt i N CC Y (ui q L W VG C C O 1 14 W L 1 Y CN N q `CC y QC L Rf ,VC R N l _ 4 �Sp1LA C �1yNC w R hY C� ~ d Syyq. 4Y" 2 pTy4�'e !uV M 'ID SIN f.uu g171� ZiytlL f^Yy � 1 � .1i °u a ycL q Ys 0i i Yy,C HS N�•yW {Lai yCq O■ O a Y NNr' V y Y Lw a CCN pVp V ^ $ > C C.CV �`Of Y 9 a {y WIL ON�nM C p L L Ma �e>�IApqC f ^�4 a0N ��GM pi C pwN `�C`+ C'f ■`C� t �y�, "wYw}} C OY9sl— OCP C N L�U M w viliY����L C yl..pVS L V ^ ACV C C^ K r i 7t C O1w• Vii. ♦ C i !` LLL 4 M. V ee t� ~ Or i N N O �p is G F V w g1b'm iY L o A "Ly ^w 6 N u > ii F N n4K 6 A3`�yY 1Ot'8Y y Y V 111$¢ L G� N� N � 11 .�i w V A C V q �Y � X Y V uu R O p a N ^ N M Y p1 > O N ttt i N CC Y (ui q L W VG C C O 1 C w W L 1 Y CN N q a,. L y QC L Rf ,VC R N l � +I MyyV Vp V �yYN la u�= V 1 11 .�i w V A C c uu R iv� UT N ^ N CC Y (ui w W VG Y W w C O Hai R' Y yyyL���'s ~ CN Y a,. L y QC 2A+ `' L V N sL O Y V 1 2 N vEyt !uV g171� Clfl� L C yO� L H D .1i f"i 11 .�i i �I LAJ V 0.o El 3 t B Y �a a c M y L � La LVss N M sL (_Ay° ■ N V � r� C eYj Y Y am w� Nw KN H n A lid u'O a t W w�3 O C C Y E� s � s 4 u 9 s 9 »� Xg W Y + Q 8.,i, a' {a^ N Y G S 6 •.Ci v Em a nn ac c � a it a�io vc:= L t7 7 L 3 Y Lac O D � N ' 4 t „` L N yK W Y Y o b:�i aAi`y �. � t aaY. +► u L L 3a�i• W � C 4 o + S gu y 3 c y N L p V � Y Y DY. V jI'j�gi S V N O N P a p� v` •i D� L a i r S �« �1% �I 21 aG v Y�E OX iL0 �Ya .GY. q�O� CY wsi a� aYD M® e w jig +0 B €� �LY MCy ■¢�~3O¢�P �� q°� 0 Oaa.. V 4Ci �y � q� TB OySyii 3 tz; v 'Y N L Y O a O :v nm w NNno a L2 c. N Y 6 Y C mr ° a� Y 4 !ppwii[� to rr C °vm OYC CYLQO `p qq6 dhlz O3 y C pf V. C p c N �.LS C L 6 it o ia3� �$ 4 �iI \�-i N r qq•!! A V G� V n` Y O ��y�'�i s�im i� aga vCYS■ ee =� v' VN�aO ��ypaaP M4y"� S r O�` u +C�SD YYN .1 I'a V y 'its 4�a�4f GX MLO�w A M 1Y. CC�a �a► CL Y appppyC w °� 4M s>,•9�a u - �O VaYaa`...� yC Y }A 6O6 m SYC z$aJ °ys 4 aMiD .N �m6 v +OyCv 4 Y YMaf. n� VY yCN fi 1�a �N;O E V � u Ln eY �a4 Y� .+ry 'yo Mix TL 4i c a c pL cal O�Q• y �'M V MD CMC Yew .^MiNACNO1� D C 4 c�� Ywcu aerg go�..4�� fir = -NJ - Id ;z-. u un 4 B Y �a a c M y L � La LVss N M sL (_Ay° ■ N V � r� C eYj Y Y am w� Nw KN H n A lid u'O a t W w�3 O C C Y E� s � s 4 u 9 s 9 »� Xg W Y + Q 8.,i, a' {a^ N Y G S 6 •.Ci v Em a nn ac c � a it a�io vc:= L t7 7 L 3 Y Lac O D � N ' 4 t „` L N yK W Y Y o b:�i aAi`y �. � t aaY. +► u L L 3a�i• W � C 4 o + S gu y 3 c y N L p V � Y Y DY. V jI'j�gi S V N O N P a p� v` •i D� L a i r S �« �1% �I 21 aG v Y�E OX iL0 �Ya .GY. q�O� CY wsi a� aYD M® e w jig +0 B €� �LY MCy ■¢�~3O¢�P �� q°� 0 Oaa.. V 4Ci �y � q� TB OySyii 3 tz; v 'Y N L Y O a O :v nm w NNno a L2 c. N Y 6 Y C mr ° a� Y 4 !ppwii[� to rr C °vm OYC CYLQO `p qq6 dhlz O3 y C pf V. C p c N �.LS C L 6 it o ia3� �$ 4 �iI \�-i N r qq•!! A V G� V n` Y O ��y�'�i s�im i� aga vCYS■ ee =� v' VN�aO ��ypaaP M4y"� S r O�` u +C�SD YYN .1 I'a V y 'its 4�a�4f GX MLO�w A M 1Y. CC�a �a► CL Y appppyC w °� 4M s>,•9�a u - �O VaYaa`...� yC Y }A 6O6 m SYC z$aJ °ys 4 aMiD .N �m6 v +OyCv 4 Y YMaf. n� VY yCN fi 1�a �N;O E V � u Ln O O O L I NO _ A w :ii $ LLi k $ q VL NN ^Sr NS t�O. O +[ 101 M C p 3WLy 4 N C UYr� Y �C �N 4M MC m r r N 1 YCC O C A w. a 3 ^ L M yW V L sir Y� d U . c M q� ss C SbL C 7 N.;% Y _ k.pJ 9M aJ w I L O S aaA E4, w L L q 5 L P- swY a M uN r L� N W 6 C pt 1Ly �� � O A O L W G A N G 11�� yi.0 7V� 'V CLOT lLJ'Fp a W K n N C.r ` G 8V v 1°Y y�1 CY �i ' p YjY Y _w Q 4 Gp ^ L A�+� �a$4+5 + °a C �2 L O y`aV 4Gr$.g•gNCjw AN Hwy 'N" c O yVy iO scD F O Cp,W� Y ^. % A M 0 L r. y « I'd Ot R _C Y' C L ' O) Ap C �p Y q q L ` � t_ L -W pupll ry =CS ^"4 vr� `tr y�OCtC� SYOL CI H�aY. O.wy Vf �W A'. K4W (�� 3 i Ci •V If' 10 b IA C� 1 D rl /,F G>p Y L y y U �q9C gg 6 Y x 8 6'ti N L�Y V aZs Z O Y i V w LL�j f�j L4. L O L QC YAooOC L t a �•� 4sG CL C«NyV A M Y O 7 � Z eur� 7 Y H C g$y 3 b cam` npYp bi C p L N:. Nor � v dap. r i- Y Y �iaJwftr I NO _ A w :ii $ LLi k $ q VL NN ^Sr NS t�O. O +[ 101 M C p 3WLy 4 N C UYr� Y �C �N 4M MC m r r N 1 YCC O C A w. a 3 ^ L M yW V L sir Y� d U . c M q� ss C SbL C 7 N.;% Y _ k.pJ 9M aJ w I L O S aaA E4, w L L q 5 L P- swY a M uN r L� N W 6 C pt 1Ly �� � O A O L W G A N G 11�� yi.0 7V� 'V CLOT lLJ'Fp a W K n N C.r ` G 8V v 1°Y y�1 CY �i ' p YjY Y _w Q 4 Gp ^ L A�+� �a$4+5 + °a C �2 L O y`aV 4Gr$.g•gNCjw AN Hwy 'N" c O yVy iO scD F O Cp,W� Y ^. % A M 0 L r. y « I'd Ot R _C Y' C L ' O) Ap C �p Y q q L ` � t_ L -W pupll ry =CS ^"4 vr� `tr y�OCtC� SYOL CI H�aY. O.wy Vf �W A'. K4W (�� 3 i Ci •V If' 10 b IA C� 1 D rl /,F p Y y y U �q9C O N r q 0 01 E t W L4. L O L O NMC �•� NG# ti CL C«NyV A 9 Z I IL Y� Lw L7� p KCs M6'9 a EZ kA J LyE`y.Y WCyOIN L�4 yt GN V 4� C.as L� Vic LAY~ tA�yO �gNy M 'O mi CCO. C L� LNyY 4 1►p �A ; v �i 4�1p �p6! y -y 00 ■Cb uY Y.D •iy �t CO1 �fyi �MC yT LNL N� CCV UFOs.. S N. {p��1 Cyu'QW w� KI C f. L O N ph1 « .. I NO _ A w :ii $ LLi k $ q VL NN ^Sr NS t�O. O +[ 101 M C p 3WLy 4 N C UYr� Y �C �N 4M MC m r r N 1 YCC O C A w. a 3 ^ L M yW V L sir Y� d U . c M q� ss C SbL C 7 N.;% Y _ k.pJ 9M aJ w I L O S aaA E4, w L L q 5 L P- swY a M uN r L� N W 6 C pt 1Ly �� � O A O L W G A N G 11�� yi.0 7V� 'V CLOT lLJ'Fp a W K n N C.r ` G 8V v 1°Y y�1 CY �i ' p YjY Y _w Q 4 Gp ^ L A�+� �a$4+5 + °a C �2 L O y`aV 4Gr$.g•gNCjw AN Hwy 'N" c O yVy iO scD F O Cp,W� Y ^. % A M 0 L r. y « I'd Ot R _C Y' C L ' O) Ap C �p Y q q L ` � t_ L -W pupll ry =CS ^"4 vr� `tr y�OCtC� SYOL CI H�aY. O.wy Vf �W A'. K4W (�� 3 i Ci •V If' 10 b IA C� 1 D rl /,F p Y y y U U M 4 4 r q 0 01 E E A W O O L ..fi�tt I IL 1 YCC O C A w. a 3 ^ L M yW V L sir Y� d U . c M q� ss C SbL C 7 N.;% Y _ k.pJ 9M aJ w I L O S aaA E4, w L L q 5 L P- swY a M uN r L� N W 6 C pt 1Ly �� � O A O L W G A N G 11�� yi.0 7V� 'V CLOT lLJ'Fp a W K n N C.r ` G 8V v 1°Y y�1 CY �i ' p YjY Y _w Q 4 Gp ^ L A�+� �a$4+5 + °a C �2 L O y`aV 4Gr$.g•gNCjw AN Hwy 'N" c O yVy iO scD F O Cp,W� Y ^. % A M 0 L r. y « I'd Ot R _C Y' C L ' O) Ap C �p Y q q L ` � t_ L -W pupll ry =CS ^"4 vr� `tr y�OCtC� SYOL CI H�aY. O.wy Vf �W A'. K4W (�� 3 i Ci •V If' 10 b IA C� 1 D rl /,F YCC O C A w. a 3 ^ L M yW V L sir Y� d U . c M q� ss C SbL C 7 N.;% Y _ k.pJ 9M aJ w I L O S aaA E4, w L L q 5 L P- swY a M uN r L� N W 6 C pt 1Ly �� � O A O L W G A N G 11�� yi.0 7V� 'V CLOT lLJ'Fp a W K n N C.r ` G 8V v 1°Y y�1 CY �i ' p YjY Y _w Q 4 Gp ^ L A�+� �a$4+5 + °a C �2 L O y`aV 4Gr$.g•gNCjw AN Hwy 'N" c O yVy iO scD F O Cp,W� Y ^. % A M 0 L r. y « I'd Ot R _C Y' C L ' O) Ap C �p Y q q L ` � t_ L -W pupll ry =CS ^"4 vr� `tr y�OCtC� SYOL CI H�aY. O.wy Vf �W A'. K4W (�� 3 i Ci •V If' 10 b IA C� 1 D rl /,F D rl /,F tL( 11 C OC °u Vyq ,YOY� �{ayyL tl« yY~ n Yo+ vo t w 11 jl O R« %a LuE a C O } a y yr�11= Y^ N C Av 4 M n « O pZZ a R� 2 CI M 'C !.v Os� C O V 9 yggg� a n �S 4y«iyS n K A c N u99l�n yes �JaN c � v' yV ma pON Y 9 y USX yp y JOY c°�e, t NO EZE y LLq y sY V «y4 Y^ L �3a .. tD pLp �j eW[ aya P i cOaY `,iGY aO9NyA� N«N>A O V CY OC ^� �O'L^V Cj YC Y y« aYSi m� Y�ysu u �asN�y a. yO��f,p Y YYLA wNO 'a�H 01�Yy M=« T, O V G p N N C C� Na by�j a� N ■ V � {OIL YL DrC MORy�fN O.i) 'gam. c OJr 'C !.v Os� C O V 9 yggg� a n �S it n K A Oyp a y a N `EM USX 44'N JOY c°�e, t NO EZE sY V Y L �3a .. tD 4 �G:51r C 'fyQ. A� Qco V O YC yYj ��� y ypO� 9C yO��f,p Y YYLA wNO 'a�H B B�yC Y =0 T, O V G p N N C C� Na by�j a� N ■ V � yp a;A YO 'gam. c OJr L 3. 0, V N Y 'C !.v Os� ID LLV �4 v WO N ++YON � t p ✓�L � 6L a N `EM USX 44'N JOY c°�e, t NO EZE V 4 �G:51r C 'fyQ. A� Qco V O YC L�V4 Cat �If yO��f,p Y YYLA wNO 'a�H B B�yC Y =0 T, O V G p N N C V 4^ Na 1 11 4. fRS(R[T flT.t Tl A l I^V— SVT S1ti A —1— f - - -_ —.. - viii STAFF REPORT v1' iVFari..vuv .✓vvcuayscvn �,IX -RMp a Q U 1977 DATE: No'..ber 25, 1987 t� TO: Chairman and Members of vise Planning Commission FROM: grad Busier, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 8736 - utve opmen of a 3,333 fooa drive-t ru urger King restaurant within an approved shepping center, fin the Neighborhood Commercial District of the Terra Vista ?Manned Community, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Base Line Road - APN: 202- 801 -27. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the detailed site plan and elevations. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: li rtn uniid care center, Lingle family homes; ium Residential District (8-14 dwelling u:iits ,(er acre). South - Vacant, single family homes; Medium Residential District (6-14 dwelling units per acre). East;/ New single family hones; Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre). We-sl - Single family homes; Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). C. GQu+?ral Flan Designations: Project�e - egg+ o oad Commercial District. North - 14edium Density Residential. South - ?Medium Density Residential, East - medium Density Residential. Best - 'Low Density Residential. D. Site Characteristics: The site is under construction. The northeast earner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue is designated as the major gateway to the Terra Vista Planned Community, which requires a special theme and landscaping treatment. 4TFA F PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT OR 87 -36 - OFUTT November"25, 1987 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Type Square of Use Footage Fast Food 3,333 Drive -Thru Restaurant II. ANALYSIS: +7 f Number of µ, Number of Pvr��ng spaces spaces Ratio Required Provided 1175 45 45 A. General: The project site-is part of the approved Terra Vista TfTTage aster Plan of an 'integrated shopping center as shown in Exhibit "C ". The approved Master Plan for the shopping center indicates that this pad area is planted for a future dr ,lve -thru fast fog„ restaurant. The applicant is proposing to construct a Burge Ong at this site. To address ti concern of the Planning Commission regarding the unattractive drive -thru lane, the applicant has orientated the Wilding at the setbzrk line to screen the entire drive -thru vane. The proposed elevations contain architectural details of the shopping center, such as towers, arcade around the building and curvilinear gable. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Chitiea, Blakesly, rou i rev project on November S. 1987. At the meeting, the applicant su!�aiited revised elevations to address staff's concerns. The Committee reviewed the revised Plans and recommended approval ., of the project with the following criditions: 1. The appli'r„ant should work wi'h staff in the final design of the paAing area, walkway and landscaping located at the eastern portion of the parcel to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 2. The applir ,-nt should work with staff in redesigning the area at the north elevation to screen the service door and walkway from public view tr- the satisfaction of the City Planner, 3. The half circle design at the tower that faces Haven Avenue should be eliminated. 4. Additional elements, such as quadrefoil openings, etc. should be added to the north elevation of the tower consistent with the approved shopping center. 11 X11. I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 87 -36 - DELPIT November 25, 4987 -\:; Page `3 i �f S. Z�A quadrefoil could be added tc the west elevation of the tower where the Burger King 'logo could be placed within it. 6. The under canopy design should be consistent with the approved sopping center. 7. All architectural detailings, colors, and materials should be consistent with the approved shopping center. C. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Environmental Cec s an has determined 'that no significant adverse impacts would result from the development of tnis project. Further, a Negative Declaration has been issued for the Master Planned site area on August 13, 1986. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed project is consistent with the jl o sec ives o e General Plan and the Terra Vista Plannedi! Community. The proposers use, building design„ site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Planned Community. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicabi-an thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. IV. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve e�6- WET Review 87 -36. Respe lly omit d, r r City, Planner BB:NF:ko Attachments: Vehicle Stacking Capacity Information Exhibit "A" - Location Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Approved Master Flan Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" - Elevations Exhibit "H" - Illustrative Cross Sections Exhibit "I - Examples of Tower Treatment Exhibit "J" - Canopy Section Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions F-3 3 �9 KOKJ RE TAURANT DM W 17,3.0 N. HIGFItr 4D AVE. .., HOLLYWOOD, CA 9C)D2 (213) 462 -8910 To ,dvii a tiat Conae4a„ v3" ih i aabw- an n_' :ems!. y mzd .a ct a icuareir iirng Faa ' Fno d Iled.. and .:��a� Z'vwIce zae ane rt Aeainrg Z6 a , z4t r and D&Lve, - Tlvztx t 3tncinL`. 13. llwtW bt a.alzirh a aidea -id p=ed,sed, lteattaunant ea cleair sed to fvaor..caa each r1zn at'tlte 1 omr!e4 3tatiarr iafilre. aP� and,, and .the; to pick u f: a.�iracLoav a 11 is a noa#te� o tea m iruu #ea a& leaa. The aaxaaage time of�vaaa� ca i a .tat to 4=ged thnec mina `mss the tin entez tAe..lat bM th& lme. ,.; cuatwwm aec.ed thtAe loud, I C. Time negauned to .aurae. Ad .P.i.ated a4ou,-, 2`haze. PL &wtea Awm the time w4ea .the Pma'uni`LCi;t,6- U. I the wzzoom z4 .lena 4V tke fucA up wuuLw D. Tha any ial o/ .coat w w AWjzA at T: 00 q jn. Zmd Z6 cLo B, not kvc &W. �i.Gt Ce 17200 p.m. F. I eaft 1%mc�nd, Ou a. peak de a d Auwr a one. r1 I JA5 a.m. - 1.30 pm. and /, m 6 00p m. 8:30 p.m.. F. v&.:, -& sta 1�ecsasined. Tour' .to Five za". Gri.th rmu mouing at .the eslaaae4t pact ai 30 .aer_on:la f'e& caa .lel�.this gUM.4 40 maumm za&4 ux..tktz aaea. The wenage afw-eca' a� .aelavice in Oaaa. ,, fXa& pe"Oda " rut .ua at ZeaZt hull. Tk&Z 4"'Zd 4 a & aa:aunt to mauv_ =" gvzAV 15 Ada '{ Lbae f aai.t ) and .total drive: -.a`l w,,.4ime DI 84a and a tfaL 74aak - yau,, t-s4d ?o'en.f G.in g D t fait 0fae� Tnana:lu Jim LM V.P.1 T.V.P.C. TERRA VISTA r-� MOM CITY OF ITENI: ___p RANCHO CUCAIN '10,NCA -rnu ,LA% PLANNING DIVISION IjBrr---� Sc.'Lll,: JN rj El V.P.1 T.V.P.C. TERRA VISTA r-� MOM CITY OF ITENI: ___p RANCHO CUCAIN '10,NCA -rnu ,LA% PLANNING DIVISION IjBrr---� Sc.'Lll,: Eli )'P"*Jt "11,10-IMOa . - - , 0 11 wts ��?±�;;"1' y� S ,�z l r t /,fit 14 za Sal. --------------------------- it 1 lilt f F 17 II 1 &61 12 ary cr., RAMM aVAMNCA nX14NM EXHW, s cA ma�yy'^` ♦ .++rrw • Q C w ..waw+L M wM . wr wwmr • � 3 1 �... � A .n.ta.r s � Jj • ; .t, � wM.n. «wr, w,srwr+r Al Ay .Ark t �.. ••�f��w+wu► c+ wear r a�r.4r AAMitir w „g o •� V 4-71 -4 - .-��.� •,,,fit -- :�.y --- +� PLANT PALETTE '`� :�-•- �; ' TREES - - �! [xl{TSI .Mu zo RFJtAac ♦ . �y PNWS CCiAS�ERA'ATROPLAP” - �1r� uOO�cTeDCA+A sacA LSlCAtTPTtlSaceoa�cnoN NOTES: • AIL PLANiM AREAS SHALL BC r..., a SHRUBS "WGATION SYSTEAC PLAN TO M • � •- AYEUAGRANDIFLORAEDWAIr', CZ. ° �MTiiLLSTRWrTRE£SP£RCIiT,,.,]t. - IMTTOOtp167NTUMA♦W1'EELiR•: •=TM AND lf vf..6:=D ". �- AOAPANTMX AFAICAMA APPROVAL BYMY. .- .MALLOW TEMP -. ►- FEIEROCALUS AUmAmXA GROLM COVERS v- A)iAML COLOR wyy�Iy M ►-OPMOPOOMdAPONKM t�.M1ll i7 -- 0� 1.EUC0I.EANA MY CF r MANNING DrYWON P, c, 11-2.f `; � E CH rr SCALE= Nit � �\ � �| � . ., | . �� �A g,� � �/\ \� . f � B / zr i a �► ► .: .. � ice; ^�, ' '`" ,. >> � _ }' ��: _' •�` r PARAPET MOULDINGS -TYP. J. o' . - A' �j r. x { N: !f 1 a ,�LiC✓ i� t S� 4T iT i r. 1 i RESOLUTION NO. A PE50LUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPRGVIMG DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 07 -36 FOP, A 3,333 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD DRIVE -THRU RESTAURANT WITHIN AN APPROVED SHOPPING CENTER IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY LOCATED AT TI?E NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND BASE LIME ROAD - APR " 2- 801 -27 A. Recitals. (i) Bob,,.Deipt has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 87-36 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject" Development Review request is referred to as tithe application ". (ii) On November 25, 1987, the Planning Comnnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a ,e,eeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found,, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. eased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on November 25, 1987, including written snd oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows; (a) The application applies to property located at the northeast, corner of Haven Avenue and Base Line koad with a street frontage of 120 feet and lot depth of 167 feet and is presently unimproved; attd (b) The property to the north of the subject zite is a child care center and single family homes, the property to the south of that site is vacant and single family homes, the property to the east is single family homes, and the property to the West is single family homes. (c) The proposed site plan addresses the unaestheticaily pleasing drive -thru lane by orienting the building to screen it. (d) The proposed elevations with the recommended conditions of approval contain the architectural style and detailing that are consistent with the approved &topping center. f �,r PL.WNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1; DR 87 -35 DELPIT Novoibee 25, 1987 Page 2? Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this r�mrtission during the \,above - referenced' meting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth �q paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission_ hereby finds and concludes as 'follows: .a) That the proposed project is consistent..with the objectives of the General Plan and the Terra Vista Planned Community; (h) That the proposed use is in accord with the Objective of the Development Code, the Terra Vista Planned Community and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Derl opment Code and Terra Vista Planned Community; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrivental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to propertizs or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has ben review-aa and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2:and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. a) Planning Division (1) The 'landscape planter located at the east side of the drive -thru entrance shall be increased in width; through angling the parking spaces. The final design shall be subject to City Planner review and <,pproval prior to submitting for-,plan check. (2) 1he area at the north elevation small be redesigned t6 ::screen the service door and walkway from public v 'e4, through a combination of trellis, columns, screen wall, landscaping, etc. to the satisfa,,;tion of the City Planner, prior to submitting for plan check. (3) The half circle design at the tor(er that faces Haven Avenue shall be eliminated. P► A€ KING COMMA sscOt): RED'* (1'i'I OM , No. <.? DR 87 -35 - DELPIT November 25, 1987 Page 3 t (4) A,,dditianal architectural elements such as € guadrefoil, openings, stucco` -over, etc. shall be added to the nQ�th�l�vaHti�oc the towers, t,- c0h`i 'gfi the approved center. �oved shopping cent''- - f The quadrefoil m added to the nest elevation of the towers err the Burger King logo could be placed within itr( Ar5'77t,'S �eDthu►`kt. -,r (b) The "under es gn sha11 be consistent with the approved sh�,pg ng center. (7) AT: free standing walls and retaining walls shall be provided with decorative treatment such as stucco compatible with the exterior building materials. Detailed designs ofi all decorative walls shall be included in the detailed landscaping and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance -if building permit. (8) All pedestriaa walkways and across circulation aisles shall be of the same consistent textured pavement as in the approved shopping center. (9) The applicant shall utilize the same uniform design of hardscape such as trash receptacles, planters, benches; bicycle racks as approved for the entire shopping center. (10) The design of the signs shall compliment t`,e approved architectural program, and shall be consistent with the approved sign program for the entire shopping center. (11) All architectural detailings, colors and materials . shall be consistent with the approved shopping center. (12) Additional landscaping shall be provided to the south, east and north elevations. i13) Additional landscaping shall be provided to the renter open space; area between the drive -thru lanes. Detailed designs shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. (14) Vines shall be provided to trellis work. (15) The lighting fixture design shall be consistent with the one approved for the shopping center. (15) Random stacking of roof tile shall be provided consistent wl the approved shopping center. r •. 7 7xv IT PLANNINGR DR 87 -3b , Cur�hISS1'R :i,u€it» Nil:. - Nov;m- , ca, ai.� ti J (17) All roof screening +411 be architecturally integrated with the bail ing design Mere a roof parapet wail shall be used to screen all roof mounted equipment and projections. b) Engineering Oiyisior (1) All` pertinent conditions of Parcel Map 9504 ak t` e Master Plan (CUP 86 -03). for the shopping center shall apply. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APFROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOU*BER, 1987. .LANNIN6 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RMCHO CUCAMONGA BY: 1< ry T. McNiel, chairman ATTEST: uraa Tsui ier, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of November, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: - AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 6 P' Q - �.. rLL rC ��yy 9ee ifM p L Y..�a {L[tlYY C40 A a CYr. 401 -Y Y p. L M c Cyp( V Y M= M 6 W p> - L. �y - o" !� Y. ]• W C 4 ,S'L V yyyyi , L Y S S h n,� ' L 7 a 0. ■ G. OR l.z �'V�N O• Lgeoa .. �'}" t _ w s t s g _ b 6 a�e N� 3 p Az l a�aa,° Eli 1-02 ♦i i� Y bl L 0A) u w M gK w x i �iJ ~� Ma ^�3F =uy, gags NNE $=n,�1 Val ._ 4. rryj....`�Y..1 iS6 yYMY 4. V=YS YY �� CCR rC O O uS �1 •.-. -ppp �� � ~�a'31 .GN Y y i ]p. N� NNCCC X611 7�•pV p6 +Y.`yL,� 6'ltql= vQ CI N +t_=� yYjyy N"y Y2 OV� a NYCLOprJ V My6 t tir �01 rrC _fir �'3iii Y a p_ tNN_aaY Y+1A bL �YACICiNi.4 gr -pG \ \N r� i� 2 `O'� Fi Cg Gti b ^' M IN ry g �i0g�CN0 C� y� YY �l 4 O rf s,• ° O " u O a� aw 0� "V i> 10 yN �a>1y ■SiYQ ~w U puy � 5$ W O ` U = C p o p> o %W M M� � C- u a MCI 2M p. C? ti �.~r • N � Ci Y u 4 1 Cytl � 0 _0 Oil M ^ Q, V0 1 1� MP{uY �e Qj»pfg } .rt MG 5 Y i O w� M y ~ G j _��L��MC'� .� A Y '� � +9 E L f 9 d�yy �n■_ q�O �V y Y 3y� \ tlL� tl i� qqqp (((��� �L Ali AqY� ii js6Yi > i a '� r'" �' L { r, h• N�•�.N- �aaY� 4s�°we ,N,''&LP� '�c�� �' et °. � r•�'4"'% nw ' NCnC tby��7L Mw NY«� MCCVyy~�� tl G C CM Y11! maw �S. M�� �171Q� VN rwl. }L � lam` �" ���$ �p�' -i�=C� ��o.i•����pLY�� �=�`�a+'€�� ��V� type �}�G�L;,,�'W Vw�C }a`.�Y����tl�w^�yL'tl •w`S��M"q� Npv� u6� • S ^�� �C FAA,,CNV CSb� N Y7 T �yyQ� _ =_ €1NyYnp�(� >�Lpp�. ,-I Intl =� °G'� _!_L!��lL ibL9y3 MM. in 1S111-91 pL �•ks�'Y Yom[` N1�y§�y[{D4 Y3 ty�� YC` b �_Y)J$Y, 4x YLL p� � w Y P. � 4 •fin i M M L 111 -91 iC f. N S N 6 .N.• u �,e BG.t C ^ �S w V s ` y but cri "'.ti. 6 °aria c til of N£ '.� «''+:Y u'„g LYak yOCy AwY,, aCV �4fpp tlC +?'yy�M�� Of � .g �FC• �4y„ � i �M PNP y p+` V Y 4a V ; -a 'Y1'' �b .fP iJO O`a CoN{IC{ bV Y�C LMO U`. g_^Y + Hy Y !U-11, V EL wyi`ila � Ny+LVP'.�y qe vL�O Ue .. ,T~ V'" Sw� 91- ppq. M� FL•sV LA R� "N S NONts y t�O LY N�yy NVG L. 6v «�Y M` tlO y� CNM .. �Y. �.'V..`!. bN e1�{.Nn V yyu az 49N yY tl�vM�C�YC NV.r yy,gqea •��{pyC L�CQ ��CwC tl{V��p �wwq G� L3>.0 � i tlN O� '� ^CSj SO1 �o pp p.Y.p4IS C a�tl V3 ywr �nL yy i`• ^-LY §-- fE.4 1 AOOM Yc7•.., � LP; �1�P � >Ny Y6 tlwy �Vr.�'C -If E.4 �c'C Yea C4 LS3a Q AW Y V"�iL'� TN6 LW Sa �C3�q }Ty 'OYCaC qj y�j y��. MC .YS SrA ��+5�}L•� w�� ��C S''i L�Np,�S O• �M y•�n� �SL�N Y� LCC W y y M� Q d C# C r Y,tl «5. N N P hC P 4C �W t N n ,��My� C V Y � ry�l�Q C =l p� GLS sy Y ^ �a�i VKr�Gd• L ~ C� 4 O •Cf �pdFw V '� T if MM {L� PV � y ~ # L © � Y q _C Y � 3 � N'� S i w M. i aw � � ��015 w •! ' G > �y NL C� � »�{ �LLLP OL�II p3pwf NGYaC7 L•Y CTMgUw 4i a�j V YL L <AaLYwO AV AP > yL C L yV ,6 S�u(�a, itYY`\ 4C aei µb iLZa .Wi N * *p Y. R'S X t4J C..��'O' DGM' iCPr Yw Sre y[NC•0 ie ME* Em R 11 N 11 L OTO CO OE qV QY CO iO-2.wC -1 V tom. il.`� wCyi r4C LyE R ^GY ^ t r2 Q ;V ^ ^�Dw ya��G =i CV aw H. CVV ui01 INd °AA.�a OrN °.seCue L V�tV. LyfyO il. 6q YN N� Ly 43-0 4 N V O 4 y1 V c Q y �YMN� +AY- NMO�'��.V3 v 4av0 c.i 5 �Y ■1n G _C i"C +'. 'p^..yys .2� V MwygL ILLQ�iq�O� �. '��Yl�l4 w *Ot4%J NYC. #C O VtCh C r�i+�n y' ^duccyyo,Ll� Ora ao p' ^IC i ����,►�ay�Xyy3�S °� =( C„ a �+ �c}� ��.4( ■c� w��w �� � !t �NN GG �S; m, iryaQLq�NNOYp, LYKy' &.y�Aaa O�O`�i eye ���Y. O °Irp b��+ 4CC `N o.a Sl°ny1LLClY Yt'ya CM. .2 N Y,�M•L• i0 g�A V� � ~y A p ^A..y "�00�1 =• '�VpppCCO �O.� ^Y Lt4 V Vg YTNa'o" ^ yM f'�NY_D y J �s .L Cy aY L�l Y N i N V q �Y4 0y r QL ` C N �4 -Fig : y ppa L r P M y L ` p µ t T.r4 w wsc'yI y Y^Y�y�". 7N.` _CMLL�^J NOG}�Ly�1 LLL OgNp �YyN,ypayq�M 4 ��YaIyy A4 CN4 C.r V MOpL Q�� NM> CC vY YHAL.Y YNN � C N � * � y L.. M GC4 4 ^. =!r $�G44 ��4uN _• � u'$ can yy $ r► « �Y . 5 .122 N' aio'�YSe_ i ° » -. •� M ' i 4O�Q e em--; c M ^ 9 Y aC V t4 E*0 t+Q pC�= V i �N'9OWp� C' Ny i isl 2Tk ' ��� >4 Y C1. 4 g 0 ' L .� 7 $ u 3[ CR{f w wa`i 'ra cr�e_ �'j °� i�N ° °� C`i ui°.° '"° T€i.'�,"�.Z+Yo�. oC yVVYNz v�r �QQ� 'M�N� atiaa �Cry�° OIr. L CL 4{1 p . y� N 1. r. _�4ya ... c 4 iY OI p ■4 �'yLyp CVLO �... 4°( J.y� '� ryatc _Y _Yy~ N= Fop VO. C7415 -CIE O.� 4CV_C• � AN O " ��Ni4f n11 _. LOC1c�ya� $r6� 1. O� OY yV �4i9 ^N iiNCS^ YO y yNV L ANY" ` N9 -93 Y 4SO Aey„ �4L� VI yy .� i pMO� ud, cCC EyC CG Yw GGM- Ly9G ;e LOS+ N°a/! V 4LM Y C r �+ V 6" N� A l' • V V.Llw Y !C13 9N � N�yGy Y4��° <M MO <Aw s <OM HQN <V <° �ON.C..w <'Np 6Ya NN22L tt K 4 t �^� �1 v a ;J) cjv 3 . '� G gx L Y wd 0 � Y Y T� tY Z�oM 1U r ni V P 6. t ;PH C^D V W { u Y � r r. M w Y N aO C M A u ^Gt y m �L��ai r u L ,�Yy�ir�S� y �S�•V ^ g" ■ ay S Ct`.t Q^ � N 4` 4-20 z M Y Yl�j +yy }�Y333L ZL NL!Q`! Ma i C UL� N VO Y O W qi ^7a y�y>�T a It rti1 Ctl� G NaC� � Yp o a�K L Yuid 0.w L ,rY. a y Itu 1 M A � w �Ll pLn. Y E Y ««Y,, N�'.Y..i _C N'^��` 9 Map �s3nI ..LL Z'✓ !i �LILN� �A9 cjv 3 . '� G gx L Y wd 0 � Y Y T� tY Z�oM 1U r ni V P 6. t ;PH C^D V W { u Y � r \` H lie" Y w`V + V CL L V Y q��N{ �OV tY pY g V C.0 pM^ � 3 �Ly _ � «�wS S,'wj" � � M � yL°• N " ,°v, pw+. � opG r sis L w0q y Y.i W LLOI O, O 'O �Y LL` . ~ y�0y` Cy■pw S rY G4L i-r Via{ =�,,�M � O M Y ■ 1 C pS+ y HC L t u LL L C y � N � M �^ N L� M. L � ,7 r� � S� L i C �� Y Y✓ O fJ n4 L; y ^V� 9 Y6il. yy 44 iK pN�` pU{M� ® N+Vt �p 6b yy� N .,z- CN � YLp IL 6 � �p .LNG ` 4a yY >Cw OfO'sw �Ad M . . Y aCNaU+ �C >yy..C. ` L 6� pT 2` C Y L C i 0. 9 d M Y V N O N C1 N L C +. L w �• L'.� Y N V C� • � pp�O. • � IC e�� W M iG) 0 y N.�. 001 Ly yV� SL = y �yyppw�� p yFf.'3C� �{yy�{-- �G O �p CQCQ tyo fuu. Y N 7 v cm L ^` ^ ` • Y M i O C i O L^ O 4 A dCC a 0.. NNW w Y N L i p V Y Y Ma $ K sue`'6,,3 o�.$ Ali fS Y ' 1 O 11 C] rm r. M w Y N V UO j Ty V xy V M^ A u 0 i Lif w N c D 4` 4-20 z M Y 4 C N VO \` H lie" Y w`V + V CL L V Y q��N{ �OV tY pY g V C.0 pM^ � 3 �Ly _ � «�wS S,'wj" � � M � yL°• N " ,°v, pw+. � opG r sis L w0q y Y.i W LLOI O, O 'O �Y LL` . ~ y�0y` Cy■pw S rY G4L i-r Via{ =�,,�M � O M Y ■ 1 C pS+ y HC L t u LL L C y � N � M �^ N L� M. L � ,7 r� � S� L i C �� Y Y✓ O fJ n4 L; y ^V� 9 Y6il. yy 44 iK pN�` pU{M� ® N+Vt �p 6b yy� N .,z- CN � YLp IL 6 � �p .LNG ` 4a yY >Cw OfO'sw �Ad M . . Y aCNaU+ �C >yy..C. ` L 6� pT 2` C Y L C i 0. 9 d M Y V N O N C1 N L C +. L w �• L'.� Y N V C� • � pp�O. • � IC e�� W M iG) 0 y N.�. 001 Ly yV� SL = y �yyppw�� p yFf.'3C� �{yy�{-- �G O �p CQCQ tyo fuu. Y N 7 v cm L ^` ^ ` • Y M i O C i O L^ O 4 A dCC a 0.. NNW w Y N L i p V Y Y Ma $ K sue`'6,,3 o�.$ Ali fS Y ' 1 O 11 C] rm gea r ut im k ell rP wO$ c �$ Y.`t a$ `„ i. —�.4 e „mayg € u w �a G Nu r. np $ ^^ N Q A V t P� CppC MMM YY uu Mq N pu qpY t tta .I t hid r XS 9 ••.0 4 rt L Yy, s a . M y L Q jTL Nil � QY'r _ NYYOP 8Y g g Yg € Ji w8 A x o� s�3 a-- 9 C - Z N S .6 ji ax Eli x � 4 r NVCY °a I S`� p-FpC i3 ti o »y ji.. u Q alw 4 01 M ba •ii�s`Nw : CGN'V �N Tx Y Cp■ NXY y y p yyO y X64+a 'C Wa 6 WNVVV L1Ny �O. H i^i .r C ' � ni of • �. �a X w �i a 'p^QCp2 4Y YLY NM .O: D`C:LCM.. GS Y V M V D yY -w LF �a Y Y 6�1 .53 � LI ��•Y L '1 V L L Q6Y �E�t y i bwAi L�-i p�'sb+ C D u M q Gy pY »iSAC C Cyr.5 aii %N q�. Y� i O r r. s73 � G C v lrw era r�s, ail .1 c� ^ lC r6 r►% op�o 1 w N ^ .yam � � p$1 ppgLryry4 r�� VC yf p"G an Ta a�{G�'a ^ A� W ~ t;o > M,°.. c i E �aQ jKwi Y ^.. CW C iM x L• �M p _C �. I. Y1y^•� wE '!;�tV,Qa,-'.� rD P y ti: ei R Lrapp J .. Y�Cp �pV � jam•. G� L t �=Y a/�l Y� $ qC�a tMM? Lqcm G yw�r w .rM ^ } ; � CG . tTCi YYY a iY K li M�N2 Vr4L�, U _YO Y wL -» C �l ir� � 2�.� r, A = N Y a h Y L It » Y Y �w.n�N ' MM � p C Ca:� C.M 4i v Y ` tiK as + _L C• ' ` 3i o,�:5 °o a.•v e�w. .� acii a'.p1. �.ir��_'"r��$ �a .rw °�.i �v � Iry &u�+ c``�M r O � HN O .. NM aM s Y. GS Y V M V D yY -w y 1 Y 6�1 .53 ^' LI r� Wtt� LrMy aii %N q�. G C v lrw era r�s, ail .1 c� o� ^ lC r6 r►% op�o 1 w N ^ .yam � � p$1 ppgLryry4 r�� yf p"G an Ta *^ a�{G�'a ^ A� W ~ Y .;z L� p -N A F YVWa i L o. 1 jKwi Y ^.. CW C iM x L• �M p _C �. I. i a�+W rD P y ti: ei O � HN O .. NM aM 1 �irJ iw, au yY -w V E W L Jr t LI r� G C v as ail .1 ^ lC r6 VC LLY L c M3p HN O .. NM aM �L �irJ iw, au yY V E W L Jr t IL G C v as ail .1 ^ lC r6 VC LLY L 1 w ASV 6seN V» !41 it yf p"G an ag- pL C u ry Cali g. a�{G�'a ^ A� C3 Yi Ls ~ Y .. .;z L� p -N A Y.. Nuys •t ; V, YVWa i L o. 1 i a�+W _V L+ M • si ° AN LLJ CL Y C V V' 4-A C r, li s L C qs `ICC` WW■ � O Y � b n i e pe � �, yYy=W r.:0 liz 5'4.t -Y c Z Er �p kta _ CC aYn L �f Y' ~ N ' r F. � �•�y C ��v ry C� y �t� L s. .�A[ N��+ � G n = Of •� plY.,4 ✓ �t« L qY Vy ~ �`Y L Y Ct4 7t�jw � V ' y ��V¢11 2• ° �� N- � V •y as aY +C�if.��• L�y 6�.V ViL1.Y ytjp UO all a ° y N ygYU (I 'b- OS Y�L 'tlS ✓' Cv0 !9 �ia u ~ ©■ SN LC•jy ) N` LoV, ��Ca �M ��{ ■Y/ 552? fm V18 ♦_..II.., N NV4 vM a+ � �� 3 W�° q ^y1 �� Y }11 L F- RN Nfl� .-1 r.�.N F� <G F•� 6..'JL Z1S IL H Y . OAT[: TO: ` FROM: 8Y: » ` CITY uP RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,__--_- -_--- --__ ` mv November 25, 087 ~ Chairman and Members of the P1urninO Cmon ms|pn Brad Buller, City Planner � ` Tom Gruhn~ ��1stant ' PLAN CHECK 87-7801 - RVIAS - The appeal of the Planning Commission policy roof mater on new construction, locat�A at 10378 915th Street - APN 209-122- 20. u ='' �. ` ' ,-_ ` clarification LF bufiding materials as the plans were incomplete. When the applicant submitted fir his second chnck, �taff included tile roofing as a correctioe,� item based on Planning twoission policy requiring V�i i-oofs,,' II. --.r. --i_--- near the -_-_--- corner of Haven - Avenuf, 3r.d , Arrow Route- The approved plans ind"care a tll'e roof as required, however, the applicant is appealing this reguirement so that an -' asphalt composition 3ingle, similar to the surr-unding property,, can be -installed, At their re- aifirmed that thei roof material an all new construction, regardless of wnat type of roof material exists in tue surrounding neAjhborhoud (oem attached minutes). [ll~ RECOWENWION. Staff recommenduthat the Planning Commission deny the quire the construction of a tile roof. , � / Er"� � / �Yty n7anner OB:TC-:te ` ^ Attachments: Letter of -�- Anneal 1987 Planning W"ission 14inute� of October 218, Octdber, ',I, 1987 t, 1 o Wh-V it Hoy Concern. When my building pIATlC;4t° 'first reviewed} several corrections were - v' noted. One of the correcsons made was that I state the descript7 a41 �'IrA , `. class of felt and roofing surface to be used. yr, reference was made about the file roof or any policy regarding rr" acoeotance of the roof description I presented. I am n t,,asking for approval of a loser finality roof. I'mtonly asking that I be permitted to build a rm:F that is consistent in appearance and quality with the existing rcofa in the --14 ding redevelopmnt area vftmre!`, I'm plamdng to bui.Ii" The inarease- 'cant resulting from the higher standards fad. the trusses, plus the added ccst of the tiles is a hardehip for me at this time. if I had kxx m about this policy at tha time of the first plan .;heck} inybe -I could have :made alLAenceft. 'Ilse planrA were originally sutmitted on 6/9/87. I didn't .find out ahoti•,t the city-POlicy until 10/15/87. Ihm* yuu for your oncperaton and urA- -- sta Aing. .Aaron M. Macias 9 }zr r OR- a ., Ca�3ssipr� Rusitss ``�CLEit#srt. Me Roots - pan Colman presented a staff report. Discussion ! s" heard regarding the tile roofs The direction of the Commission ,;S the requireomt of the roofs on W'11 new construction With the exempti�n of remodeling, reroofing, and rel cations. �f r i c g � FT = plznning Commisrion Minute-- October 28, 19 7 i \ DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: �'--- jl( --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF R- UPOR'r November 25, 1967 Chairman and Members of.the Planning Commission Barrye R. Hanson, Senior l svil Engineer Joe Stofa, 3r., Associate Civil Engineer of utilities along 7th Street an.-L��iciter Avenue for the development of a warehouse addition in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) located on the southeast coekr of Center Avenue and 7th Street; (APH ?09- 26213) ! 1. ABSTRACT: lite' Developer is requesting the deletion of the ccndition requiring th,e ANIL undergrounding of existing overhead utilities adjacent to the devel opmeat. II. BACK,ROUHD: The project consists of a 1.3,700 square foot warehouse addition as shown an Exhibit 1181 (Site Plan). The project was conditiona''ly approved by the City Plawl er on September 23, 1287. The Developer's latter i( requesting i�� u,letion of the requirement is attached as Exhibit "C". K ' The Conditions of Approval require the undergrounding of the utilities on the project side of both 7th Street and Center Avenue including a service to the west side of Center Avenue. The existing overhead utilities adjacent to Lhe site ate shown on Exhibit "D ". III. ANALYSIS: The Developer's reasons why he feels that the conditi.tns should be deleted and staff's comment on each are as follows: A. Policy Exemptions: The Developer contends thot the project is exempt per Section 7.a, o%. the Po^ cy Resolution ;at +,ached as Exhibit "E ") Asti Staff could not make that `termination, because the propcsed- i addition does not srcLifically'miet the criteria of the 6temptions. ITEM .H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 86 -27 - CALIFORNIA FINISHED METALS NOVEMBER 25, 1987 PAGE 2 B. Reirob- trsements: The Developer stated that the properties on t'`r- opposite side of both Center Avenue and 7th Street are currartly developed; therefore, making it difficult for him to ue reimbursed for`one half the cost< undergrounding. Staff age*ees that the property on the west side of Centti ':venue is mostly developed but feels that the property oi. the north side of 7th Street han the potential for further, #ivelopment. C. Excessive Cost: The Developer contends that the cost of andergrGunding could exceed the cost of the propos_d orsite ifapr%vements. Staff does not know the cost of the proposed on site improvements; although it would appear that the cost of the undergrounding could exceed that cost. None the less, the cu&ent policy does not :I specifically Exempt p -0acts for this reason. ,t IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff - ,ecommends that &i Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the appeal and after such consideration either: 1. Deterfni.ie the development to be a warehouse addition and deny the appeal by minute action, which will not require any further act' . +n, or Rd 0-13 1 � C 4 2, Determine the development is which is exempt under section 7 a. of the nde; ~ground Utiljt +r Resolution and approve the appeal by minute action and direct staff to modify the Conditions of Approval. RespeL` fully submitted; Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Er:gineer BRH•:JS:dlw Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A") - Site Flar• (Exhibit 'R "'; , Developer' Letter (Exhibit "C ") Existing Overhead Utilities ( Exhibit "D ") Po•#y Resolution (Exhibit "E 111 Conditions of Approval n-- MY OF *RANCHO CUCA,MONGA 'ENGDTEERW4G DiV7WEiN:: Off'` . t tfUIT°" MAP l r -L--j 7 rx S7RE--7- 4 t 4t of, CIT&" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGRWWG DMKON 0-44 *JIM lei .6 Awl CIT&" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGRWWG DMKON 0-44 CA'RY CHELL & ASSOCIATEIS LAND PLANNING CIVIL ENCINEERING :,9330 BASELINE, SUITE 20S • RANCHO`CUCA� NGA, CA 91701' City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 Baseline Rd. Ranrho Cucamonga, CA 91701 ATTN MR. CHRIS'WESTMAN ASSOCIATE PLANNER (714) 989 -9905 October 14, 1987 —RECEiV €D--- PI.ANNi(ro cwrSion M GC1 14198' +i�19101111211l213141 6 RE: CALIFORNIA FIMSPED METALS-DR 86 -27 Dear Mr. Westman: We have received your amended approval letter and conditions, as outlined in your ie;ter of,,September 23, 1987, and wish to pursue toe appgPl previously filed by our office relative to there tonditit►ns as set forth below. sv l at :, We believe the requirement to underground the existing overhead utility lines on aoc+iter Street and 7th Street should be deleted, for the fallowing reason;: A. We believe this project is exempt within the exemptions Certified by the Planning Commission previously this year. trefer to :section I of the exemptions enclosed) B. Both properties adjacent on the west side of Center Street and the north aide of 7th Streex are cur- rently developed, thereby making it difficult for this property owner to recovi►r,a�y coats thraugh, undergrounding or lnlleu fees,,1 ?km`t�ie conditions currently requires. crry ^p 0110 U U JA J.ili MONGA H —ff m DEV1 LDP'S RII JeAPPEAL. N a1 ?� 37 i MR. CHRIS VESTM&N OCTOBER 14, 196 r PAGE 2 r t C. The expected cost of Urizrgrounding the utilities could easily exceed the cost of constructing the (� proposed enlar;;enyent° to the loading area. It would appear that this e an example where the economic`' costs'tR underground, existing utility lilies are elearly;!in excess .or' p,1,Vbe in excess of the project costie, thereby mak i ng ilo.,1 s a prime example of the imprusition of another,'kind of alternative, for examplz, e.g, a square footage tee for industrial uses to effect contributictf to utility line under grounding, I Please schedule this item for the consideration of tho Planning Commission at your convenience. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation of this project. Truly yours, GARY MITCHELL & ASSCICIA ES p ¢ice ?•� war M Y �r' cheiI President GM/ra CITY OF RANCHO U ,A.MQNGA Trr. : tgrf R �� �� � RMMw r immowi �i Lax 4: IL g s 4 IA ReSOLUTION NO. 87 -96 A RESOLUTION Of THE PLANNING C"ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ``ZUCAMONGR ESTABLISHING: A REVISED POLICY FOR THE UN DERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND REPEALING RESOLUTION;"0. 86 -77 r-11% WHEREAS, the PIsaning Commission of the City of Ramcho Cucamonga wishes to repeal Resolution No. 86 -77 which was adopted on the 28th day of May, 1986 and establish the revised policy contained herein. WHEREAS, the Planning Comtis,,on of the City of Rancho Cucamr ga wishes to re"4e unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote a more aesthetic and desirable working and living environment within the City;" and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to +nform ;property owners and developers of the City gcal. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved and estatI stmd that all devel'�Weqtc., except those contained in Section 7 and any others specifically waive(► by the Planning Cammission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all txistirg overhead utility lines including the removal of the relate", supporting poles iacent to and within the limits of a develc,Aant as follows: 1. Lines on the project side of the street *- a. Said lines shall be undergioundea at iej;e &VeloPerls expense. b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission aecides that undergrounding is impractical at present for such real- as a short length of undergrounding Mess than X60 feet and not under,lrounded adjaier =t), a haavy concentration of services to other users, disruotion to s.!isting improvments, etc., the Developer shall pay an in -lieu fee for the full amount per Section S. c. The Developer shall bTq eligible for reimbursement of one -half the cost of undergrouading fr.7- future developments as they occur on the opposite side of the street., 2. Lires on the ODDosit@ nide of y tht street rm the ect: t DevTy loper or one-half amount per ction 6. 3. 4. Lines on both sides of the street: Thu Developer shall comply with Te�` ct n—'f alive a3 ue iligible pr reimbursement or pay additional fees so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one -half the total cost of undergrounding the lines on both sidaa: of the street. Pore lines containen 66KY or lar r electr,ca7 line: All lines shall be un ergraur e� or in- Feu ees poi in actor ',cr wti° seytinn 1, 2 or 3, above, except f r 66 KV or lamer electrical lines. 11 ! mar X'; _. ...... .... ... .._fir:. m.. _. .-.� ._v- .- � .... - t, 5. L, ihiis of Rasaansi,bb .;itipst a. II) -lieu fees shall be based upon: thM length of the property . being developed fr-,oW Aroperty ltie to property line (tile center of agiacent streets .or Orner properties). b. Undergrotxtding i<iialt inc1+:e :he entire prbject frontage and extetti.. to: (1) the first existing pole off -site from the protect boundaries (across the street for corner, properties), (2) a new pale eracted at a pt,ciec2 boundary (across the street for convey mcpertie ,-), or (3) ar: existing pole within 5 feet of a project boundary, except at a earner, 6. Fee Amount: The amount for in?lieu fees shall equal tHo length (per Sec -ion 5,A) times *tie unit amount as e�;tabl ished by the, City Council based upon informatirn, supplied by the utility •ompalGy.s and as t.rdated ;zriodically as dawW necessary. 7. 7a�.�e xemptions: The following types of projects shalt bee exempt from this at�itiOn of functional. equiPmr-int to exi,,Ating developmentaa, rude s: loaOng docks, silos, stitellite dishes, antennas, water tanks, air condstiow's, cooling towers, enclosure of an outdoor storage area, j parking and loading- Areas, block walls and fences, etc. Ij b. Building additions or new free standing buildings of less than 25% of the flog, area of tho existing building(s) on the same assessor's parv-el, or 5,OW squara feet, whicheyer is less. c. Exterior upgrading or repair,-.r, existing dev+ek*ents, such as: rornofino, addition of trellis, awnings,. landscaping, equipment „ scr -aw nj, reprinting and exterior ianishex, etc. d. Interim: - .tenant improvements and no*i- cofttruction CUps. e. The construction of a single family re.,.Idence on ar existing parcel. f. Existing ove ~-head utility lines located in }rails, allays, and utility easements- -tit a heavy concentration of ser4ices to adjacent deaelc `~ „ and the utility l rnes are 56011 or more from the riot of way line v A Special Boulevard. g. Residers {31 subdivisions of four or fewer single 4.00y residential parcels,, ,There the utility lines extend at least 6OU' offsite fr�;m both r.he - project bot ndari es and the adj acer -, property v not _ I i-kely to contribute to fut4re undvgrounding. All references to streets still alap mean allays, railr.4ad or channel rights -of -way, etc. - 701-02 c) 11-25-87 TC Agenda 3 z annn Mai AND AMP IED THIS 10th UAv OF ME 1987. d? PUNMING ISSIM OF �YHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMMGA b , Lat y 4 aa�r Y� yiB ATTEST: _ r s Cf"! ary ✓ d fr I, Brad Buller, OaPutY Secretary of Va Planning Coraoaissi'on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, duo hereby certify that the foregoing Reso%tian duly and regularly introduced{ passed., and adopted by the Planning, Comi S ,jon of the City of Rancho Cucaerxiga, at a regular locating of the Planning CORRission held on the 30:day of June, 3987, by_thq following vote- 20-xit: AYES C • OM?ISSIONERS: EMERICK,, CHITIEA, MCNIEL NOES: COK41SSIONERS: TV fg'oY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:gieE ABSTAIN: COWISSIONERS: ti` a 1C3 CITY OF RAN,, 110 CUCAMONGA eon Was Box $al. wnem a e.1003, caRibrxa 91730, (na) 989.1 as September 23, 1987 Gary Mitcreli & Associates 9330 base Line Road', Suite 205 Rancho Cucamonga, L�alifornia 91701 SUBJECT: CALIFORNIA FINISHED METALS a OR 86-27 Dear Mr. Mitchell: The Development Review process for the above - described project has ber successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the ftllowt, „ findings and conditions.. Thank you for your. participation and cooperation du wing this revi,-v process. We sincerely hope that this process has been j positive experience for all involved. This decision shall be effective followi�a ; IO-day appeal periodh ?ginning with the date of this letter. Findings A. fiat the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan. B. That the':,groposed use is in accordance with the objectives of the ndustrial ;.raa Specific Plan, the purpose of the district in which the site is located. C. Wit the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be de,,rimental to the public health, safety, or v'Sfare or abeterially injurious to properties or improvemen,s in the vicinity. 0. That the . proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Conditions This project is approved subject to the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: 1. Additional screening shall be provided along Center Avenue. It shall consist of berms, a screen /security wall of pilasters and wrought iron, ands; -an intense planting pallet which is consistent with existing planting (i.e. Cypress and Alive trees). Detailed plans for landscaping, irrigation, and screen /wall materials and location shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior 'to issuance of building permits. H.r.. Deborah N. Brown Jeffrey King aq Mgaat.. Dlnnts L Stout Marto i W-11 _L_ GARY MITCHELL A )CIATES RE: DR 86-27 September 25, 1987 Page 2 2. Eight parking 'spaces shall be eliminated from the southwest corner of the site anA, be replaced with a continuation of the street side, landscaping .rea. Engineering Division: I. Overhead Utilities a. 7th Street The existing overhead utilities (electrical) on the project side of 7th Sheet shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage prior to public improvapint acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for undargrodnding from future development (' redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. b. Center Avenue - The existing overhead utilities (telecoamtunicatien and electrical) on the project side of Center V lue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on he north side of 7th Street to the first pole south of the project boundary, including the service connection to the west side of the street, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, ohicHevtr occurs first. The Developer may request a reimbursmnt agreement to recover one -half the city adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 2. Security shall be provided to the City for any work to beo, completed within the public right -of -way as approved by the City Engineer. Please note that conditions IRRY specify completion of ce:•tain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits. If you Should have any questions concerning specific conditions, please feel Free to contact Chris Westman at (714) 98961861. Sincerely, DEPARTMERT City: Xa BB: CW /: ko Attachment: Standard Conditions CC: G.L. HemenoverZ- A rfe 'e.- �p> �loipR/.?i. 6n`lt n� U Z. eo pp�� c yy q C C I' �Y °���'J +��`'Y�ai. �((�►. M. iVYfO.HN �QyM �. CV at �cyy oV �� q��p' 'moo 1j, _.^p_« S:. � Y' +� �Y piJ '[f =Y_ 'IF� fVi �'� a V �'� • � V." ,p ■ N� Cra °3aM+ai� u0 rr 'u...�o yiFir: I : YIS�A$�'j rw Yy i} S+ffi.a�+ CS p'Fw�`w�p�i��p$ pO ;, °..g.�Q i�R�nM Np'aNss` >�y .L OrI 4!�s �� N ���g�Oa w � ail !Y� s i,)w .�p6 ern _ �y T���..�$�Y 1= a ..M ^��� g�� ��g■ S� a��� N����,,.. .. :�dr� < »_ of 03s N� I !D Y aYs9 O G H v Y') O I gI i 4 �ma v ,.�. � V a C t . pa- Ny 4 i a O Q ypYw ®r �y1Y ` } i- i4�N- v^ M 4 N r w V r n go L C a• � ��Yi..IY� Yrn Yp� Sj y a ps'"sL pp rM Y L)C p. �n p : i J j9 }yjM ° O YO4Ta it: {y 7 e Y ^$yt� ^� 9L1�►yyY N yN3 r � � Q K ! � • �w � � ry M � Y � 4O O gY s.pae y E L�u4. y °L VO k� �y~i m~L :• �tIYO �N Ors N =6a�iAp i'd's '� �O'�� a� Vi QiV M Y O�LN N+ Y.• W.: yry♦ NtY EOs �4� YOw �. S4tl.� ~CC y pp{,� °•.'+'Ma vd+ YY1Y1y :.CO ate. �6 ^ ■per . ; Q• g 1L. Y i i ° y C » JC G.wl. p �y eYN b pO ViI M Ly^ ~moo 4y»i 'v` ®yN�" L 7 O. ` _� t O.9 CC, Y8. La LQo.Ab g Z`t >pN.Y� A N :5 CC i �.gNt _ cc ,,pp �QQj y w•C Zy � � 1 psN yy �Yt cc QQ p TCpp s YC '' C f ;' Lp 0 1 0 ? O N. Y» w C as Egad _uYq i� iyM� p� ``. ♦ L D1 M A p M -9^ ^�^ .Y �N y�l�•4.L ff it 19•Li ' � ^Mp, +S��.t N-1 N�y�{���g� sP►6 �j V` �CrO C YMip °�V y» L eGNYy 'L1 ^i�M NYV YX ♦�"'W w�wsp.r MN L Yg.'•� ^p +i C y�wG •., Y.4Oki Y J_f 'yy0 +C jjj�M{���I•Q•`• `N `9� fill, `Ew � M� SIY .. •`3 CY 6+ ��t �T iC ■Yr �gppYY•M 4�p 11 �Op� { GKV CY 'YY. L�y 4 V� 8Y» w OY> LCN a fig f J 1Z S.".1•r 2,w . �^ Y 4 >'g MyV MYGYN ♦Ya.Lq . •.nv -&= �.yYyt��c 4F, y�g=�$ y y +ia S`�NCNQy NY A i� Yeti YwvuO A�� �N ^ V 8C� »V � Y G O� EAw V •�gwp �1 Lam. �Sy� N�O Q`,i NCy' �rLk iM CYV ° V eg'qY IN r a �- r- _54 a ; ac ' Q p C ° g y� l"qC bCy �r e`y{OY�• Mt�a ' a VGiY i 1 d Y» + Y y Z �q R.44 A c 6V��yQC ap �21+�� O .•. 7 Y9'. Y V C �e r^. 115 ^ _ i i 10, gp o ±^ � sN LCe y ± V � x O N is ` N::w »MrM� Y.Y C y' � L V 0v GZ OQ QN Sc �C °' Y" C $ y�My�• `''�� Si c 0� »KQN .•i$ � yp+ .6 Ya+iY Vea! �jfi 1Y C R y4Mi •d �.%C>N + .YY. Yuu W rx Q Y Y N V 8> K A i d r r ►L• N° < w L N •[ � j V� d V 1 A N N LS Y p q 'j ��t T S X 0t0 ag ZEEQ \fbn SrwC NC4 L`gjS .C.'C a V C LY~yL rVyYYa,. Ma VN Y y wQ CIQ q.d� =yL'C C�{Lg+� L`M yL 40 C M g_N �� qS ci or.i L g �. w q CC O �Y VAQ 6N=M1 y APE % j 2rv-5 Y av� p w OqC 4 Y y Q h N N Y �Nt is 5 � 4 y V v 1 `aq � i y 14 C C ` »A w N �O• N 9- %V VM ^ N y ^ 25 �q�S 5R +�/- L O ps�p + +• L q t. p ^ q ..Oi tl �xxyR'q® plY OI V G� y „ $i $ $?« oo v�gw`yIVYCy .~gayi �yptt_LN �hyV `' p� '.M �q eY V Mi YL yip NO��`0�4 O8 �L O1h! wV r N^ �•yG, aV n`Mi :te �G+ ;I pY�C� MC � 10� Yc pC � w♦ _N a�F y"u4H.� .. ~aaCp�e�i �s ti4�_9`'�'YYyy �i..>,a ^v «��ryC..q�r Sit H N i ; N Y > M 4 0 4 M� 4 K Ir Ts M Y d �`tt CA N Ag g C'' ag > C • A C -�S wain o_,' w y`ui'CL vi yra - -o G *S` NYC ytCtv.. ^ -4— em"; p V=1wYp> V q _ >p it ff .O e N O CNS .` ~KNN Oq G : .S1 � Z C0.r YZ� CV fli —5 !%F=. 27r Q` N j• Y q��0 .-E CZZpa p .. CJ�� ►. M 0 a- ^GW {p• gC�,CGS CVpa CVy{L�. ! C ^O';i .• /: 4; r.YS S� YYW O VOT ~V p C g S Q Nip r C v M L?L yVM ' G V'S p Npp AL Let b i• w0 pNyN V ixC •f MAO C'"q m ON so 2 it^ V-i � •. a4Y t Az r a�N'o �o.w <u M C W yj 4'. D N S wC., y tN_ C■ar IQ �M. � Y C 1f ttL p '!YY7 pC �r'�„ YNL 4j � �)V■{ Y yC � 4 C b t��Vi�tlIpR pAxy~ tMi,`N' M 4eglp �LL4 Yxp.Wq ss ti.� i ■ a� V � pN ` @ G pC f. ccV Q y O All^.pr 2 44 N H -.Z!" a R"fy M �4 y�� adpIi3 CwLy~ KKyHM� 4YwrN:b' N =t�k 4 VV 4 L 9I O' w�R. yL_ t ya y` 6 i �N. V.9rC' Al y.7+Y`. r: °' t�S 3 � Ltd ; _ n12 1�+Te'�a � M 'o P N Y M Iii 4 N k AK�A i GLy ~MK N a .tea �L CfC NOaNmv e« !-,Casa.. ell �~µVV°Q Mab Yq' `w c .Va . lG 'y6a s rStV t A N 0 a iM +VKSN � + ` , .r Q {N C a Qy + / a Nk^ M K ir� i• + N a b pi � Vyx Ai. � ! LJ a �iYp Ny'�C .M � � h �na1R� .�NSIrII� « « M 'Vat■ sL L! . fa1N 6� .r 'r_Y VR Nf yi b 0.AA, {Va r Mt 53% Ana yY Mb CL Alt, CC ib pY � ; N L by8 g., Utl G L 9 N�5yY ¢ k r QN.. rsu CC Lj f o O C.`�Owbi w�j K -.' 4 N Ci1 y pp y� V V�C 4. 4 ~ 64 N bywY ,w Vii.. V L b{Y ac ry iqqi C�tQ & !2 acQy � ib �C4tl i +VIIC N w 1IML C!w C.'.ti aAC 0.AC Hs 111 N d Y N arar .,ri�« t �R•.,,.,.. <a C+vN.N.� �w „7`ai �'a«,v r - S r LU 0 ,� Yy � C C C NLdVI L 333 11 y C 6 C 4 � adiN i +adLV. dY4+ d ` CV Nd ' $ � wy A:.q cNO ' � a LC ps L u ■Vol :,is u"Y i4 d�y f.0� 1Y ¢N ,D aL pN p ttd YM Vol �■ +L'� �►VI.�Nws = C�.'.. vw Y M 1mr OY LC VN + +JMaY Q...666ML t 77y11 � & YQ S y r - V N I@[O -fit �rh d ps F, O at Qgg� ep^ la int W-2 Jr I±.miLL isv�o CAA y�p3,$« i�vy1 yi+ 1.5 �.5 u� Z. CSN• I $.V4p4 It CI� O y N AI f �tj y y�f ^I W Y 1 sn �^ C �.C.e a� L °� ►S o_s � CO C.� w VM Qwp+w� L4Y + r G a C N •06= as�3NV Ry m iyii dd 2 am ■2O �� 4� w�'1 � M�I��M += y Yx�� oN�� L�1�y.�L,�C ''j }.��vy■ 2, _12 _,X M� ,O�^ y4�,gO L� +4 �C +p : -@ Cyj.0 4N at C M W S i 'se .ODD mG a . YL ty � L Y C ~ ,En � .r9 U72 1 S � y CM Y9 - YY yy C p a 7t +� Y O S V C^a/ G M �y � O A jS 4g "cc a_� Cp J � � Y w Y � a•Yp � Y �q q$ptis Y _ _ cycy pp ` 'O CN04 aQi yi aai O Q ■■4y � Y C • YY +�� m0���IM111 L Y N dY I�sr- YCG^■p Y{p�N CGwiS ^Y �y4Y �w 6r y qLS 144 Oy MaN 9�Y. Y6 d K O7 �.�.4Y Nrr pEE ` 'w�� "_YYYYdNw "�aSA Ci60 O1{0.•e.6r� L WN WVH 6 wl=a f:w Ya61i +Y K , ^ O W V L}? pp Y O .v i W q C9 ��Y a�CT N N M xw(a1 Ny C .w.i L 4 A ¢« Y �Y �. L L O oYwN O v se O yp"_c Y« �$'w' Y °o9WV• + L 3` = as L'� C $L4 iV p 9aa U+u Yy pYj , .0 AL x �MLQV 4 3 N ^Y N W ^01 iy IL E Yp bd ai» O LL 9aM-VN saw g� @ gas" g4` r v wrx OI�WQ �y� ey uuy y v� y'a�.Y��6N CN L/ VY y .�i�YC� yt 4 fiyY C1L QM� � «N 6G Jlpa r 41 � ^� L� 4p> Y NYl L W s 'Y q VW�L. i.��. .-. Y� WpY �p �sOa �• ion .. ZS> Sib -_ ppw�e Y p Y L Cl GN Jt'O H L Q M L i � �L Y L_M wM N Ana y g wC6>�aF € �^ L�� ^L ✓ Wai is N ww Or ^ C^ 'tl v rN N� ^r L6y MLA yV $� N 4 b Vs+. ` Lya yyp� C rY �1 NrzI aY Qa G tix• .fC it Ce. OS. iiw NV i�J 4Vr WrtIJ 2 its rC p-a yN 25 Sz V t>�. G4 tc rJ S� O SR �$y Vas oa wW vi v ~ iS$ --E p43 Nhip « =�.. S -t `3a �W N ".2 N0. AY wO 4 Gp� `A� eO V. GY L L p�p��. i1 - CY41... 4W Gw�. 6 L4 NN i�YtWy� G its 24.2 ya:i IL > �.;1 .N V LrN ^G�rl gCCCCCG D.r4 +Oy GL ^Y ^`rq \Cc My4 GjV g 'z IwgC 1A O YL N NVW H L ��> pG W�GpV CpN O^ ;t Qy� isY COp T^O+ �Y�1 Vrs� q fa N� Y ■C N N Yy NY W Y + N w 0 w 6 'a N O Z S R a Kty i ■YCW N {Y ■Ct yM � �Q � �S4�rf t y�. Ol „'�L� � �y V«y� .+4 > L6V9 M�WCy �_ pa p��GG�{i� < L W L {�j A N L y u r Y L L. ^ M its I� Y C ` ENz YI SlW tr .GW W V tH,, W pHr V f 11 11 k r F[� ac a 11 + gr0 L L C V `f y f py °O ^ _ d p L H N � 1 �l 'i O ` _= 33� C 4' ui tag sn +z^ $$`o L � L `ae J -1 i 4 P O C S i +b+11-1 w g « rry N M Y� Ya A M VM1^ i L NV Q 0 ytlw,,pO �Y M j Ygtl. y TtOt a E y y Oy G o iiiy `' 1 yy bN YYr yOy L $ M �yy 6py0 4L �a, ^.�C Oey td w jm� y 1 If Mtly = O� A7 yL1g= +igNII �fiva ti M_g �aYYYy���g u •'�. O d y,���N pqY e� G� tttiiii to Y■R 10y O.q CY d0 64 p� O } IC CO 5 Cq IM. .27 O � y^ C y y <N FC K 6r W <_ C N.~.a. as i +b+11-1 w g « rry q�� �p1yM� Yps y TtOt a E y y JO> LLiZ yy bN YYr yOy L $ M �yy 6py0 4L �a, ^.�C Oey td w jm� y 1 If Mtly = O� A7 t Me Fi yQf = x u ze L N w �pp .27 O � y^ C N ^^ L {� klM1 N $ate, L X C N.~.a. as i al v K4 � I ems^ ew w O « tY 'Lt Nr ij q�� �p1yM� Yps y TtOt a E y y JO> LLiZ yip 'Fy 6 6py0 �a, ^.�C Oey td w jm� V L y Y rs 4 0 9 t Me Fi yQf = x u ze L N w �pp .27 O � y^ C N ^^ L {� klM1 N $ate, L X —11 r 6 . DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: �r \ — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOP STA" REPORT November 25, 1987 Chairman and "iembers of the Planning Commission Barrye R. Manson, Senior Civil Engineer Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer - 4 TERMINATION OF THE CIRCULAT;QN PATTERN FOR AVILA AV - staff request or Planningcommission — 37'M on concerning the circulation pattern for - Avila Avenue located between Calle Del Prado and Alder Street. (APN 208- 921 -7,11) I. ABSTRACT: Staff is requesting Planning Commission direction as to whether or not Avila Avenue shall be extended from Calle Del Prado to Alder Street. The area street pattern is shown on Exhibit "B ". II. BACKGROUND: The owner of the property at the sot!theast corner o Alder Street and the future extension of Avila Avenue has requested a building permit for a small building addition. Staff ,required the dedication of the portion of the Avila Street right -of -way within the parcel_ a condition of the permit, because Staff feels that; the., extension of Avila Street is a logical and necessary` circulation link fnr the area. The property owner has objected to this requirement; therefore, staff has submitted the issue to the Planning Commission for direction. III. DISCUSSIiON: Staff feels that Avila Avenue should be extend-eTTo Alder Avenue for the following reasors,, 1. It will provide secondary access for Calle Del Prado and Avila Avenue which currently are a deadend street system with no other secondary access alternates. 2. The creation of a tee intersection at the Ironwood Street/Alder Street/Avila Street intersection would allow the installation of stop signs for better traffic control. ITEM I PLANNING C0MMISSION STAFF REPORT Circulation Pattern for Avila Avenue November 25, 1987 Page 2 0 3, It will provide an additional local circulation route 1"0 traffic to access on Vineyard Avenue. 4, It';will provide an additional pedestrian route to Red Hill Park to the west. ,ate property owner has objected to the street extension because it ill take a portion of his property and wtzl increase traffic along his west property 'boundary. Staff feels that traffic will be increased on Avila Avenue and Calle Del Prado by the street extensirinn but fuels it will oply be local traffic and will Prot ceeatit a hai, rd and that the benefif? -out -weigh the traffic,increames. It is noted that staff is only requiring the dedicaflon of street right -of-way at this time. Staff is prohibl.ted by ordinance frodr requiring improvements, because the rvjues:.Zd building addition is less than 650 square feet. ThOefore, - obtaining the right -of -way will not leack b the i�to*diati-N construction of the road but will preserve the option for the future. Staff is also recommending that the street, half width for this section of Avila Avenue be reduced from the standard °30 foot right -of -way with an 18 foot paved width to 20 fo.et and 13 feet respectively to provide a 19 fost setback fl'om the exist*;-, residence on the property (refer to Exhibit !CH). If the �v ftsion _shou'id decide that tha extension of Avila Aven•'. -Ys not necessary, then staff would reconmerild that Alde.' Street and the north end of Avila Avenue be finished at some time in the future perhaps as shown on Exhibit "D ". IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff rerommends that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements and afti;r such consideration either:. il, WA P'LAN'NO CMUSSZOR STAFF REPORT Circu tati ad Pai~t.rn fo+` Avila Avenue Nove",nber�5, i.g8 Page 3 �- c� r 1. ermine the necessity! for Avila Avenue extension from .. Salle Del Prado to Alder Street at a reduced 201 street i / dedication and direct ftaff by minute action 0 obtain the necessary dedication for the future street extension. OR 2.° Determine that the extension of Avila Avenue from Calle Del Prado to AlOar Street is not required and direct staff by �mjnute action to require alternate street= improvemenCss to he completed in the future when appropri at;:. rj r, Respectfully submitted, II Barrye R. Hansom Senior Civil Engineer BRH:3S:sd Attachments: Ylpjnity`Map (Exhibit "A ") Or ulation Platt (Exhibit pa ") Street Dedication Plan (Exhibit "C ") Alternate improvements Plan (Exhibit "D ") L O a 6 X� iJ 3: ff lic 5 G InN3AV VIIAV Ev NO SN 3 mi ui N4 i 133MIS 31voy CL LIJ OV - 49— gn 34W- IA �74 0 51�jVd kk.1 D v� S" t �► 0d.1. €1 b✓/7 L14 w r l uj �� .� 1�72 10 ! ! I I c t ! LXI Vo- VAV 59 :P.i 01 II LU !! 1-4 i 1� r W In ic?l x �l A* 0 DATE- TO- FROM: BY: ZUBJECT: n CITY OF RANCHO CLi6MNGA STAFF REPORT November 25, 1987 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Bruce Cook, Associate Planner a-It 9- OViRDNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -04G - ix, utYtL6 rftnt - A requess to amend the Geft-eral—pYawn Land Use Map rom Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling V units per acre) to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) for 66.05 aches of land, located on the south side of Base Line, west of Archibald APN 208 - 031 -18, 19. (Continued from October 28, 1987 ) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEW AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT reqUest to amend the Development 0 s r e s p rocs ow- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to High Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per acre) attached with the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHW) to the base district for 5.05 acres of land, located on the south side of Base line Road, west of Archibald - APH-, 208 - 031.18, 19. (C:?tinued from October 28, 1987.) ENVIltWIENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AME"Z" MENT 8-7-04H. r - request ha amen a an Use Element e e Plan froth Low- Mediam Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to>bffice for 1.59 acres of land, located on the west side cif Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road - APN: 208 - 031 -17, 54, $5, 56 and 57, (Lontinued from October 28, 1987.) €NVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT reques o- amenU the Development s c s Map trom ow- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Office Professional for 1.69 acres of land, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road - APN: 208 - 031 -17, 54, 55, 56 and 57. (Continued from October 28, 1987.) ITEMS J, K,, =L u PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 'CAC DEVELOPMENT, November 25, 1987 Rage 2 Aft (t i DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 87 -02 - TAC DEVELOPMENT ?t A Development-Agreement between the city a anc o ucamo. -%%l and TAC Deveio*nt Corporation for , .the puvpose of Providing a Senior Housing Project per i`e requirements of the Senior Housing Overlay District (Sec4ion 17.20.040 of the Development Code, Ordinance 211) for 170 Apartment units to to located on the south side of Date L.-Ae Road, west of Archibaid Avena,e APN: 208- 03IL -18 and 19. (Continued from October 28, 1987.) I. BACKGROUND: TAC Development has submitted a development package, nc u ng eneral Plan Amendments,'1RPveiopment District Amendments, Design Reviews, and Development Agreement to develop a se'hior housing project and adjacent medical office building in('the vicinity of the southwest corner of- ;Base: Line Road and Archi.'4ald Avenue. The various Amendments and Development Agreement ;were continued from the Planning Commission meeting of, October ' ;'78, 1987. At that tine, certain issues with both the Design Reviews and Deveiopment Agreement were still unresolved and the items mere not yet ready to schedule for Planning Commission review, the Commission Indicated that they wanted to review the total pro3i"ct at a single time with all the individual elements included. Therefore, the Commission continued the project four (4) weeks to 1 permit the opportunity to resolve the, outstanding issues with both the Design Reviews and the Development Agreement. However, as of this date, tl;e applicant still has pot resolved the remaining II drainage i;ssuei per the a;r�stion of the Engineering Division. As h a result, the Design Reviews are still not yet ready for Planning Commmission review. The Development Agreement has been completed to the satisfaction of staff. however, the applicant has not had bOffieient opportunity to review and comment on this final version of the document to warrant its being presented to the Commission for review and recommendation. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue all or the titled items as referenced in the beginning of this report to the meeting of December 9, 1987. Res 01 it ed, � I 8r r City,lannex 1 98:8C:ko" f y rM A November 16, 1987 City,of Rancho-Cucamonga l P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 -0807 € Attn: Bruce Cook Re: Seni;rlMedical Project Baseline & Archibald c, Dear Bruce: Due to the incompletion of Design Review, we respectfully request the planning commission review. scheduled for Not }smber 25, 1987, receive a contirance to December 9, 1987- Thanks for your cooperation. i1 Sincerely, TAG D VELOPMENT CORPORATION i Ter R h tensed P esident II t:i(G:sf Du4om C'tnttr Dr Str. T€ ,-~- 3 it'rtit'tt�qt7:irt . 17141O 1'7R- � r �! . _ .. , -' ` II •� °i� s�..,_ .fir -` 2 11 lY TP11TT AT T ♦ lTlYTT/Y n -. - - - vaaa a�a ass a.a�vaav vV VCUitVty titD A• STAFF ,REPORT f a � DATE: November 25, 1987 0 0 U `> O: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission 1977 FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Beier, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13579 - multi-farily residentia evejopment comprising M s on 0.69 acres" of land in the Medi►mm Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) located on the east side of Hellman 4 "Venue, 325 feet north of 19th Street - APN 201 - 474 -12. (6itinued from November 10, 1987.) I. BACKGROUND: This project was ' ^eviewed at the October 14, 1987 nm ng""Commission meeting. At that meeting, the Commission deti ;�sined that the site design did, not meet the design goals of the Development Cade or the General Plan and continued the hearing to November 10, 1987 to allow the applicant time for site design revisions. The applicant returned to the Des=y "eview Committee on October 22, 1987 to discuss some of the design concerns., Primarily, the concern is that the site is not suitable for max7Veum density in the Medium Residential zone and that the building mass and amount of hardscape on the site does not interface well with the surrounding single family character neighborhood. Based upon that additional input, and suggested site revisions discussed on October 22, 1987, the applicant will reschedule for Design Review once revised plans are completed. The project will be forwarded for plan6 ng Commission consideration upon Design Review Committee recommi�:dation. No new information has been provided by the applicant;�t this time. Any updates will be presented to the Commission during the oral staff presssntation. The Commission should refer to the original staff report should any decision be necessary at this meeting. R tfu s tted, B 1e City lanner BB:DM:te Attachments: Letter from Applicant Design Review Committee Action Planning Commission Staff Report of .lctober 14, 1987 ITEM M ��... �-- !iellman Avenue, nit2 t_oma,. Celifornia Q1701 I r r �• 4-141 980- 2ceaxi November 041 1987 j i l Debra Meier City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O.Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca.. 91730 (714) 989 -1851 Ms. Meier, As per your request, th %'- !lttf?r is to request -a continuation on the Planning Crmmissior, meetne� to November ,45r 1987. Would you please ctsn- firm a time with me. t! Rzspectful ly r irl r �3--- C"Y OF PANCHO CtJCA.1JOt1Cu1 PLAttNitl, D'jv,,S.ta! 1�,i DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS ytrr 6:00 Debra October 22, 1987 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT ,13575 - AYOUB - A multi - ami y resicential development comprising un`. o�acres or land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 d! ling unity per acre) •located on the east ;side of Hellman Avenue, 325 feet north of 19th -- R. _ street - APN: 201 - 47442. Design Review Comittee Action: • > Members Present: Bruce Emerick, Dan Coleman, Brad Buller Staff Planner: Debra Meier This project was reviewed at the.- -sober 14, 1987 Planning Commission meeting, at that hearing the CQP,2ssion determined that the present site design did not meet the deegn goals of the Development Code or the General Plan and continued the hearing to November 10, 1987 to allow time for site design revisions, - The Design Review Committee expressed the specific concerns as folY,aws: 1. Although this project is in the Medium Residential District (a-IA dwelling units per acre) the committee felt that this particular site was not suitable, due to size and neighborhood character, for maximum density of this zone. 2. The 2� story building at the streetscape is not compatible to the surrounding singlti' family character along Hellman Avenue. 3. Because of the density of the site there is a large percentage of hardscape and not adequate areas for -planting of significant sized landscape materials. The Committee provided direction to the applicant for %the following recommended revisions: 1. Delete one unit from the building facing Hellww Avenue. This would lower the density from 13 dwelling units fer acre to 11.6 dwelling units per acre. 2. Scale down the height of the building facing H llman Avenue to a maximum 1k story height. The building desigrfshould reflect a large single family home. 3. To soften the appearance of the entry patios the Committee suggested using a hedge rather than the block wall to define the patio area. 4. The site design of the Hellman Avenue frontage should include additional landscaping along the driveway and at, the north and south building elevations, along with a berme., landscaped streetscape. M-3 DATE: 01 FROM: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 14, 1987 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner BY: 'Debra Beier, Associate Planner SUBJECT: 6VIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13579 - AYOUB milY residential deve opmen compr s ng unft on 0.69 acres of land in the Medium Residential Dl,z_i��ict (8-14 dwelling units per acre) located on the e,est- °side of Hellman Avenue, 325 feet north of 19th Street 201- 474 -12. I. PROJECT AND SSTE DESCRIPTION: _ A. Action Requested: Approval of the subdivision map, conceptual TT p aT n, conceptual grading plan, conceptual landscape pla-�-, and building elevations for the development of �', townhousE- units, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density-. 13.0 dwell =ing units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and- T.onin or - ,stn 'T5w-nX;,"#edium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Existing Single Famiiy Residences; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Existing Townhomes; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Existing Single Family Residences; Low Residential (2 -4 dwell-ipa units per acre) 0. General Plan Designations: Project Sire Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) E. Site Characteristics : The site slopes from north to south at approximately a percent grade. The parcel contains an existing single family residence and accessory structures which will be removed. Also, two trees will be removed, a 24 inch diameter cedar and a 24 inch diameter pine. M-4 PLANNING COMMISSIt ;TAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 130!9 - AYOUB October 14, 1987 Page 2 F. Parking Calculations• Number of Number of Type Spaces Spaces of Use Required provided 9 thtae- bedroom unit! 2 1 x 9) 18 18 enG', -qsed P."5 x 9? 2.2 3 open',, Total " II. ANALYSIS: A. General: townhouses are designed in three levels, two s ories�pf living space over a two -car garage. The units are provided within two buildings. Private open_- ,space for each unit consists of entrance patio and two rear -balconies. On- site amenities-are clustered to the rear portion of the site, including pool,`0a, sun deck, tot lot and;oaen play area. B. Design� _Review Committee: The project was presented to the Design Ke" vieew GommiT ee merick, Buller, Col eman 3 on August 6, 1987. The Committee determined that various architectural and site plan revisions were necessary. The specific corcerns were: - 1. Co=ittee`s Concern: The site design is very tight and does not allow sufficient perimeter landscaped area or adequate landscaping along the ends of the buildings. 'Some alternatives may be to gait; emergency access to the north through,,the Alta Floods project or eliminate a unit. Applicant's Response: The applicant did try to gain - emergency access to the north onto the Rita Floods townhome project. The Homeowner's Association for the project denied his request. Rather than _delete a ut;it, the applicant is concentrating on aW the specific problems related to the denseness of the site as described in items 2 and 3. The applicant added two Maple trees to each end of the building adjacent to Hellman. However, the planter depth is too small for trees and a tall growing shrub, such as Podocarpus is suggested. 2. Cam ttee's Concern: Provide an appropriate landscape screen 'Tong the east property line to achieve private screening for the pool area from the Alta Flood project adjacent. PLANNING COMMISSIt ;TAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13bl9 - AYOUB October 14, 1987 Page 3 Applicant's. Response: The landscape area along the norih and 'Oast edge of the pool and deck area now contains a continuous screen of trees on j. 15 foot centers. The trees proposed are Maple, staff suggests using a species more adaptable to our climate.:. Liquidambar or Sycamore would provide a similar` appearance and are better suited for drought tolerance. 3. Committee's Concern: The ends of each building need additional architectural treatment. Some ;suggestions discussed at the meeting included: a. Use of siding materials on these elevations. b. Gradient change in color from upper and lower levels of building. C. Bringing the balconies around the comiers of the building. d. Some form of stucco trimming details. Applicant's Response: The appiic�nt hu provided i vertical wood siding with a horizontal 2 x lO trim piece at each floor level. _ The siding is painted, carrying out the blue -grey color range of the desired Cape -Cod theme of the project. 4. Committee's Concern: It would also be desirable to add interest to the root' line with changes in ridge location, or some vertical relief such as bringing the roof tower at the ends of the buildings. Applicant's Response: The roof line of this end units has been dropped 12 inches below the middle portion of the building. S. Comm'ittee's Concerti: The Planning Commis: ;ion policy has been to upgrade all roof material to concrete tile.. For this particular project the suggestion was slate colored flat tile. Applicant's Response: Roof material proposed is now concrete tile, C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project and determineU a with e recommnded standard conditions of approval and special conditions as provided in the attached Resolution, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and Ordinances. M -6 Is t1 PLANNING =ftBi . A DEPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 1Se AYW,B October 14, 1887 Page 4 D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initia'ilStudy has been compered Dy, vie a' ca Staff has completed Part II of the Envirormrenta.1 Chet list and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FIND NGS.- > The project is Consistent with the Development o e and"tffe` l Plan, and will not be detrimental to adjacent properties, cr c&use significant jmpacts. The proposed u". brlilding design and subdivision, together with all recomras.ded e6�lditions of a°pprov 1, are in compliance with applicable regulations of the Development Code. Iv. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has'been advertised as a public hearfng in the a e port newspaper, the nroperty posted, and notices ,&ere sent a A pproperty owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOWENDATION: i&ff recomm enc�` -,that the Planning Commission approve l Tentative Tract 13579, subject to the conditions of approval, through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a )egative Declara-ttlon. Tres pee 1 u 1 _ i r B /an�ner 1, City ^BB: DM: te tted Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Ma Exhibit "B" " Site Plan/Tree Removal Plan Exhibit "C" - Tree Removal Permit Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscaping Plan Exhibit "E" - Preliminary Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Fire Department r:irculation Exhibit "G" - Building Elevations Exhibit "N" - Floor Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions p r HIGHLAno Ave. � a R- V'- 500 t ROAD "T 4 va�AnT) C'ARt�►Et"1- „,,�„ OT r 5 F K) R -3 -T R -1- 500-- �niMETrzECITW R” I i CIT Y OF. 1TEli: R1 PLANNING RANCHO Y1C C yi I� � ONGA M y FNHIW� A�.�Sr.��L-r 1,' W 6.04 or or •w.3rm.a Mir L .. 1 a �' I a PAO •�< J 3 _ MCI Ao wlw arwr if _ E '•s � :]c R.� ,. q. �,. aoa� _ ^.a '� aav � — ]ca k*s.s I x 1 ai - - "T LOT Sr F- PLAN z� n F 6 w.ra ar a t ns.yr n'!'tiE2'i�'eU SisJiC�Y! •5CS "C'x 5,2 0.'t .lal �dG4uww oeoww PGONOl7 j St�•Y` ' "SS S•C a. a1•a4 da � R5x•,CL Rt! � -:IN -.I• ti �' : � V� a:p cri mCy01 0+�1 "s S W+' )JO •fi00 �i - .- .:...tYi +,J� '" 31: i.'+4 ��� ii2W A -•.�•, •SS Y6�Ss4.Y •LN' 'J� JJO ��•.� +c.e �.�+' �c.riLiPOC u ap: Y6 .•• r5.Oi G.r6 w WK :b ]Oa a "Af�`C JPY Y..ae Cn S�� -06 :» ]eli 3•A:,.W -i.'w .... ]71 -.•�.- :cure: aar�, aleaoo ,3]a) I +`et.ial� 3 7 - CITY OF MMI " Aa � � EXNO'i'= SCALD I Uty of Cucamonga i Removal P DEVELOPMENT GENERAL INFORMATION OR MORETHAN 6 TREES OR 50'UNEAR FEETOFWIN Ordinance No. 276, pertaining to the preservation of treet, on private property, requires that no person remove or relocate any woody plants in excess of fifteon (15) feet in height and having a single trunk circumfererics of flPeen (15) inches or more and multi-trunks having a circumference of thirty (30) inches or more (measured twenty-four (24) inches from ground levels, without first obtV.1ning a Tree Removal Permit from the City. TO -,E COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: r LOCATION OF SUBJECTSITE. 664, Hellman fve. NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF A PLICANT. . tlichard Avoub, 6649 He I 1man Ave Alta Loma CA 91701 (714) 980-1220 NAIA E, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OPPROPEFiTY OWNER (if other thar. applicant): SAME REASONS FOR REMOVAL (attach necessary sheets;: Trees are in the proposed location of building pads. (SEE TENTATIVr, TRACT HAP) ii PROPOSED METHOD OF REMOVAL: Trim from hAvght then dozier APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE: ADDITIONAL FILING REOUIREMENTS This application shall include a plot plan indicating location of all trees to be removed and retained. The species, number, and size of the trees to be removed shall be sr) designated. It a tree is diseased. then a written statement from a licensed arborist stating the nature of the disease shall be required. ACTION — Evaluation of this application Is based on the criteria on the reverse side. APPROVED ❑ DENIED By: Reasons: Date: Nctification of application shall be given to p pricr t.j approvai. If no a peals are received. tt date M action. This approved tree removal perr rMM: or building permit issuz=e, whichever comes Tnu: day period- a ne.,. permit shall be required, urs } t( r 0 w s` d W 'y S; f I 1 _ .s o. �, w.. �.r.w rr. °1+uxarrs � a�0°s °+w°•°°"� S�qn+ YMIf +.. ot. Ytlllf IO a Y,TI• ••41�ri 4fly T:SY �.. T4gtviiAte Nto Ae.T+O+:� Yom. � � S' S�•4�boi'L. Q i • �4.�.A.tlli � �• �.1�1R +� �+ DTI• M.,NYrtN1+ ilR.. w.MAI�n YI.. � �, • ,i.M ,M• ti.Y.iCTVt y i . WIgMW l7 • �, E �a.I �N � M� 1tSYYf1 � M M. '�i W fCa,H N/.�a. ikYY � Ylwle �ti .Yn• .Mr+rt NORTH E r: i � 1i 1�EE. y; .. 3� jam/ /�j� S} •,(U L M -f( bwea er Ar iii + s�tz >y i It ro 1 X3,21 �j� -. M ew/a�r se• [ baer a eee sr sr e t >w.sa GRADING PLAN ExHi rr. SCALE: M -t - `l' 1` I t� AD a eee sr sr e t >w.sa GRADING PLAN ExHi rr. SCALE: M -t - `l' 1` I }I � .r n a►. ar ts� ■ m.aa ij1 t f � { i y1 �i { i 1 { � i 1 FIRS TRUCK ACCESS PLAN, LEOEAID _ + A micasc twrx - - aegis as Tuna" olds Tnu: EXHM T: -Y-O- sue: -r3 1 GARAGE ENTRY ELEVATION FRONT ENTRY ELEYATION SOUTH ELEYATPONS I north alasaUbns sHnilar I ELEVATION, TYPICAL PROPERTY BLOCK WALL NMTH CITY OF rrEm: / ' RAND D I '[°t e: $tllklC,i2 r /I b I. e�1r. •Y �auu . A � f7 R BUILDING SECTION A FRONT ENTRY ELEYATION SOUTH ELEYATPONS I north alasaUbns sHnilar I ELEVATION, TYPICAL PROPERTY BLOCK WALL NMTH CITY OF rrEm: / ' RAND D I '[°t e: $tllklC,i2 r �� raaa:ea �l fMl YYNYI6 PRY �. .. —T— street unit alley •r . unfit w .oaraYrr Ora •�` setback � " \ `� setback t SITE FENCE SECTION - 2 Y W3 ...._ , units drive M turnaround SITE ! FENCE SECTION - 1 Nk- AZTH,, CITY OF RANCHO CUCArviONGA rte: ��►� KAN UC qty EXHwTL �+..U: A r ! MI(t yYWf NlaNy'IR* � 4Mi YOB O3OLa)!a 171v11!•�TO X0,4 i i I ENTRY LEVEL �J tleeO YCf. OLp{�� RN�il�Mq ♦O1K ' I i _ ��I � �' )pysa 1)6pp Tt♦)a - FIRST FLOOR ,LEVEL ��• i)AMR N)QIaiL 2' K3 �VwiG ML CR )aea ixaR ��'q ,Ma.. SM'u f soap n� mid '1014 W W i)Aa 7IOQ G,1-. 1!n Wa! iafQ,0i4 �/A 6JL f i (y Awr R AIeNIIC DFVNCN EXHWT- Wli'll"42 �r; d i y.in i H A k 01 El DATE TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CPxY OF RANC1i0 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT °> , F- � z November 25, 1987 t9777 Chairman and Members of the Placning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner r` Debra Meier, Associai, ?lanner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -05 GROWN - CROSS AND �iIIRL'[i"-- l oposa I �o�iu�i'a square oo sanctuary buuild�ing and a 2,300 square foot office and classroom buiTding6 and operate an extended day nursery and preschool jon 3.acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distris_1Tess than 2 dwelling, units per acre) df the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located aC 6723 Etiwanda Avenue - APN 227- 061 -03. I. PROJ.tT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, conceptual grading plan, cconceptual andscape plan, building elevations, preschool activities and issuance rf a Negative Declaration for development of tihe Cross and Crown Lutheran Church, B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning. ortn - Garden and Greenhouse "Facility; Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Existing Sing Family Residential with horse corrals; Etiwanda Specific Plan - East - Existing Single Family Residential; Etiwanda Specific Plan West - Vacant Land; Etiwanda Specific Plan C. General Plan Designations: rojec e - very LOW Densivy Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low tensity Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwellin g +nits per acre) West - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling',(nits per acre) ITEM N 7, PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -05 - CROSS !F CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH November 25, 1987 Page Z D. Site Characteristics: The current use Of the site is citrus grove. a na un,,__�ground slopes north to south at an approximate 3 percent grade. There are four palsy trees along Etiwanda Avenue frontage which are protected as historical lanLI'Vrk3. There am Eucalyptus windrows along the north, east and south boundaries Sthe row along the south boundary is,off- site). E.'- 'Parking Calculations: Number of Number of 'type Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Ratio Required Provided Church 1 per each 4 200 seats so 68 fixed seats provided Preschool 1 foe each Approximately 35 68 staff member 100 children, -plus 15 staff 1 per each 5 children II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicants are proposing to develop the front met of the 5 acre parcel. The .present development includes a church sanctuary with additional classrooms and offices is a detached structure. Besides ncrmal church activities, they also plan on operating a daily presd_4 facility. Initially, the preschool. will be estasslished -ior approximately 30 children. 1f the prograntis successful, th could receive State approval for approximately 100 childr�-Yr Ample parking is nrr.vided for s `h activities. All other aspects of the prnsi-.'4 faeiliiv, ,st meet State standards and regulations. T,te applicants t ..re provided a list of all proposed activities (see Exhibit IV) . The site is within the boundaries of the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. As such, special landscape and setback standards have been applied to this project. 5. Oesign Review Committeet The Design Review Committee (Emerick, ToT oy,'�ieman reviewed this project on November 5, 1987. The Committee found the project to be consistent with the goals of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and recommenced approval subject to the following conditions which have been included in the attached Resolution: N'2- PLAN61NG CtM 11% OR �lal,(FF (3RT CUP 87-05 •- CROSS A CR61i LOWERAl4 CHURCH November 25, I987 Page 3 I. „The Committee recommended that Vista Street be ".improved with a modified cul-de -sac. However, the Committee recognized that the issue may need discussion by the full Commission based upon any public input received at the hearing. The applicant's Would also like to construct a block W17 across,the eqqd of Vista Street to prevent 0", ite vandalism d�nd dumping. 2. The perimetbr block wall should be constructed at the north and south property lines to the point-:. where Phase I development ends. Any futc, ,_, development of this site would �- squire expansion` of the perimeter block wall. 3. All windows of each building should be multi., paned.. 4. The wood shingle roofing should be treated with it fire retardant substance.- a. The applicant should submit for`Flanning Division approval samples of -oof material, siding and rock. Also, the applicant should prepare a test panel of the rock veneer for 'review by tha Planning Division to verify quality of rock material and workmanship. C. Technical Review Committeer The Committee reviewed the project ano determinea a. the recomw!ded conditions of approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinahces. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been - camp e efib a app cant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significantj�impacts orx -che environment as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan an a General Plan, and will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts. The proposed use, building design, together with recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with all applicable regulations of �.he Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. N,3 IY. CORRESPONDMI1 Thds item has-been advertised as a politic he rig . MMMY�Report I e spiper, the prop iY p*sud, ani�- notijres sent to al 5r4wnfAvitkin 3OO feet of the project, site. o V. REG('N6N1�1�"T -Ift S� racoioiends iakak' the Planning Ctm Ossion approve a� , t -%nal, do Pefai`t 87-W, subject to el condi��s Of approval, th�r%94 in of the ached Resolutipn and issiabiee of a Negative Declaon.. i' Res lly omitted, AMY le anner BB :DM:te dw 4 x _ a Attachments: Exhibit W - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "CO - Landscape Plan � n' Exhibit "D" - Building Elewntiorrs Exhibit .E■;,. Building Elo,(ations Exhibit "F" - Statement of Activities a Resolution of Approval with Conditions a. low, A.ft dumm► Ma NOM CITY OF rrEm. RANUM (,',LjCAMoW A Tnu: PIANNII'sr, MlWirl EXtifflrD VL a. low, A.ft dumm► Ma NOM CITY OF rrEm. RANUM (,',LjCAMoW A Tnu: PIANNII'sr, MlWirl EXtifflrD cr i f CF rte: RANCHO t�'LrA� .rte= PLkNM*4G ! ✓ V S� k _ +Ctti.E: -- �s •iYa�'� _ _. '� •sue � ARP ��� a { � '....�— - s ww �r ��' a+•1rd►MM A'•�ry�f � eoi. •erwtir•w 1 \ 1 J /2�, 9i —,e ` ! _ N1 �MMYl7•�r MCI t► r �I� r , J M •�..1�_) \ i 1� • cr i f CF rte: RANCHO t�'LrA� .rte= PLkNM*4G ! ✓ V S� k _ +Ctti.E: -- �s i� u ♦7M• fr A" Map SOAL ab-4 +.K" 1 s+.r ��'�0 � ���9- acsiue�e"'iw'' �m � ." 4 ,i'i�r►u„a+�+oegt+pc.As+.*�=�, j �' ja - w' '�r+�'+ca �rw � i NX)RTIH 11 PLA? NY]"r DRISY -W EXHIBIT SC.r� IE: � . - 7 NORM ITEM: 6�VZ457 W1,j!FP a7i r 4rY 7 -0, -A PLAT- ,i'QNG DiVEM EXH S&U.= N- NOPTH CITY CF RANCHO CL . GA TerLE: / fj' PLkNNM DMtWDNti EKE- 1 r- _ SCALE (V, �§ Cross gurui ro�l n Aaar�nded sratea nt of gc s>bm tted Nix 5, 1!` ° . Lutfiei an church Ammrl9 similar stare' � f received by city on V7G,a7, t1f Rancho Cucanwrga Richard A. Nelsi n, Pa y REGARDING PROJL.z CUP 87 -05 "Proposed Lutheran Church: sanctuary,'`' multi- purpose space, Office and w" Education buildings, and parking lots %. at 6723 Etiwanda Avenue.i9 Si'ATMM OF ACPIVMES I. The proposed activities ar�d uses' €or this facility include the, . following items: 1. Worship Services 2. Sunday School 3. Jursery Care 4. Edticatica, to include daily pre - school & extended care 5, Bible Study Classes 6. Fellowship events 7. Mznagement ■eet?mgs 8. Choir rehearsals 9. Junior High & Senior High Youth groups 10. Church staff /Daily business 11. Community events, meetings, & services II. Proposed hours of operation are as follows: Sunday: 8:OOam to 9:00pn Monday: 7:30a= to 9:00pm Tuesday: 7:30am to.9:00pm Wednesday: 7t30a= to 9:00po Thursday; 7:30x= to 9:00p= Friday: 7 :30am to 9:001= Saturday: 9:00a= to Noon III. Number of gibers: Rzisting ... 165 baptized (55 family units) 5 year projection... 400 baptized (130 family units) I4. There is no proposed fume use of the remaining grove other than as appears on thz plans submitted. Any future development, planned and unplanned, will be consistent with cti {rent zoning. 1 Sincerely, CROSS and CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH L ,e-7 -z5 of Rane.io Cucamonga By W.-10 Rev. Rit A., Kdam, p xur 977619th Street • Stater Bros Center- 1 91h & Archibald a RanchoCpcamonoa CAPty * (714!$8.9 4491 , 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION Of THE RANCHO tUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION i. APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PiAIT NO. 87 -05 FOR A PROPOSAL ; TO BUILD A 4,300 SQUARE F'OQT SANCTUARY BUILDING AND 'A 2,300 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE. AND CLASSROOM BUILDING; AND OPERATE AN EXTENDED DAY NURSERY AND PRESCHOOL ON C ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED AT 6723 ETIWANDA AVENUE - APN 227- 061 -03 j A. Recitals. 6) Cross and Crown Lutheran Church has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. L87-05 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution the subject � ct Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as °the applicationu. (ii) On the 25th of November, 1987, the Planning Cc� ission of; the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted -a duly noticed public h�dring or'/ the application and concluded s;a.id hearing on that date. 1i (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of thti's Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, ThEREFORE, it is hereby found; determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: r. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public- hearing on November 25, 1987, ;includinc written and oral staff reports, together with public testimrfiy, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located'`at 6723 Etiwanda Avenue with a street frontage of 331.18 feet and lot depth -of 667!.70 feet and is presently improved with_rock curb which must be restored per the Etiwanda Specific Plan; anti (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a garden /greenhouse facility, the "property to the south of that site consists of rural single family residences, the property to the east is existing single family residential, and the property to the west is vacant parcels. �� "���0 k' PLANNING CaWISSIdk RESOLUTION NQ. CUP 87 -05 - CROSS eY CROWN 1UTHERAN CHURCH November 25, 1387 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this CMA scion,,. during the above- referenced,nublic hearing an &,u('on the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1'and,'2 above, thf,- Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and General Flan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in ;which t;e site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies w`2h each of the applicable provisions )f the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1370 and, further, this - ;Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 abovA, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference,. Planning Division, (1) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed at the north and south property lines to the point where Phase I development ends. Any future development of the site will require extension of the perimeter block watt. (2) All windows of each building shall be multi- paned: (3) The wood shingle roofing shall be treated with a fire retardant :,ubstance. (4) The applicant shall submit for Planning Division approval samples of roof material, siding and rock prior to issuance of building petmits, Also, the applicant shall prepare a test panel cf the rock veneer for .�Wew l:y the Planning Division during const- uctionfto verify quality of rock material and workmanship.,,, z� N a f .. R LIJ y 9L i ia 8�gf+o�cOG�°G.a. yS��O� L'a C°'0 9� c,w'_ q+i�n "�aY��gci ."�.,�''"a:...w Rs " apci pw tea+° cwy "ppa dV Rut ¢� 6 '; L� N'yy6 fi.,:. Mw �tY Ow Gip "C� ■p,pw a N N wlG�U _` tu• p ~� i�p�. m$.� tt -Li VaY " PLO ..ice'{� gY�3os.Eg ^y" oiY�iS eggg~ s�Td M 2 YaaL qp G. o_CC^ °YaL ..CGS wu, ■�R~ �A �L 6YYy�C' tlyeVw � O y�yJ y� vV 'CS.�L�Y� +T pM ■M��'fppIIF 3���y qqX +.G�'��C.op� C�ij, y�O � . ° �r ■. ��6 �� y 6 O1( /G� ryM' YfG °TwT &C'��yy��ye Yp gS M °yMy ySj �. vim p�O C9��VwMMM �(��" N.CV"wg4 (Yl "V^NG YS'i AT Cy� KygY� "N CN; O. -� �Z1aa ^.� Yp Y~N O M TyYyw 9awp4_(_lO C yYNFYC� SH �'c u. Ny �aN.vCaO N{.gjw FO' I 0 a w D p. F^ v+ yq U t,1 6 �t J p C jY� " • �q y a.D N�ii Noy O v y g NN A�OT `� jj V M Vw�ML �;:. °lNis i2 pN �M 6-P YOO11�w� x w Q R w N i Yjj* -j4. rte, "I�� =` °� 1� p EaE'U y° pp + Ir l J ,� i L Y° N gal. b Y0- Ball �{y M }.p�p N tL V 4. M N yi 'y "'iSa pa oy �U2 :=°c�. `l J �+YL .y>y pQ NSV 44y}1 �yyi�y9�al _ AF'° P a J` l v^1 I �i yy 'i\.. �« yy L >LOV rOYp Y�.p 'L.9�> Y • 9 L I 6 N1N q LA O 06M ®NL4 d^ w N.,. bON ft va �'.., � uu �' � r O C Y r O � � • tY. � � �` Y S� tl O N G p Y T W M 4 �I� S�4 NQpN yoy �u0( ■egg _�wA 'L `�bq1 � rRy'pN^ QO ^•N G� �{ Oq a 40 .+�,��r^a.ga� LeY p tom` W coL�. 3,['^a•. e�Le���N� ;_. � ;y �a T� Nam y N$�L �� ay. NSi L =S a4y+e 3 VgCc i �^ YC¢'M �Mw"y'�. urVLY.LG- yg4 :LL. Tppy CC „ Gya`pY sN y� ^ ~uu Q Y E LY Z^ Y Yi A p. + T V C" Y CNVN •C br ; L,i�M ggyq�' q Y L qN�.> PP��'',4q• # M � w p yCy >e� LQ � a•Oty r^..O L e AY4eq M ^y {a p}.OyQ�� NNy\M yYN� q�LM.V LYNC GOi Yy�a Nom_ aim; q im L b 6. )+�vp "' V L.ti MN'�� NJ N.O0 t a4± 0 Vp {[� Cv 11 M yO� VO qy~ .'O r1r�1 Q�s L�Y�..i a 0 M3221% --- nle �q »31YMYO O N�^•^i ygN`s'tY 4q; y r° A q Y O V] s yy Y GeV Czy • U Ny. �c y��y C��pp q C8 � +�{y�j,.�� L.�OTC 'q�.a���w yY� iY L qy e � _ + MM app ,C ,A• N 1(�� an ay+ ^ l E s N '9 C G `f•J S.�M f+.� �a GLq�q{•, 9'Y' CCr y ''''tt _oo.,S• yr� sst c � �p �wy� �yO OLY qL ^.sw s'-EP a- ` <��^+► � �u Y � NNN �L�iN.�U Y 64:NN�fl�i W �ri LS r. -c , }Y =j $ e Ji q Y NY�R Ntl MOCON Oy O 9 �G pa ^ L >RIasLp °��n�i a ho yr. off` -so i•�a «r �F� «t: o� s�it +s gcsr ��cn r C 4! c ^ S Eli yK. LT�` p ■4y�10 _ML +yp yQQ.��{LL.` aNr. .. ^ »w0 1 �NO 1Mn V YN9�'n Vy wiz Mqp_�. ^'�' '�Y'"`;'vpw iYTTL �N Yp '" _•3 r�L ��. hY .. •n^ tlY�A► �� Yp Fy M�p!A qF•� CL ya ybJ E`� y� Cyr : =:p� tls 9a m- ice. ��g iy�iq a g e a =_g LL= *a $ e e 's8: „ ■$.fit =r1i1- 0 L ' Olr^. Q L q L p d q' L^ p v O C si yy y. b i Soo°+ ew eCy� N r q 0 Y N COCN w N •� 1 6 �y L _ y L a 4 N~ p c N y 2a�L ' ayi6Stl LI .L, is €�sg -119 y yZ $ic ^ ii iS +�6N ��M-a.�e °'��'�..i �d••ato,�. r �... •v, {gyp"' ,� t s y L� C9 V —IS �y�41 Ley �.J 0r,� N NC£ p y W9 MKq V G Y 4N -Wyy0 LM U.p%,,`N �>r'1.+s u$sON eQ3 a c u4a a8 ° -o�L gyp.° «u 4S {ef " aLy,. ` iy�Z yayy�. l'ys. e. <4 :CG r0.iM I NG <T-5 it V ^4'y M'7 Yrt w .�yC p3Y C' aY ! ` C y O x �� yy C CC GG �• C.09 G LT QG .� +� � Oa=Y" O pD OO4.G. YIL O q ~.. �u 4 O� L'O R qyC% B 0�6 Cq 4.L 64 ~ t,,�.P SYaA L O6.a N Y 9a N a 7'•G' y.^. ^Dya L:GYV� CC Yp� V q`p p ii C^ pL, c C eI W :C Y ■ C C �' . OC Y'� iro1 G1 7 C NN V �4y CCt! 7� a V N4��09 S��yYyU 7 T VD�p uj N' G�Cq. � � LM "�` V�a•GGO CN{Nu�ytY Sfyy fJ W. .C' 1{,,11NNtA _qN L q } NP. yMN �pL N C d 0N 1 V q ty O L lug � H Yi Vei ;�YtY 2 yyy;EL+z D i CMO'�Q yL`°+ '"ca ^ Q °9 4 9 lz sk 2.5 q &{ iY *'_8 '�pMapq dSy...CCC� gLL4y 9^•"OS G$ T�bl q a' 3Mi;'(30y Cw'a 'L•ea' {C� My Taw' NN. 4 K« Y LLV, ONQ. °N �NS4 'Ja Grag L 01 ayVy� GC Cy�■■�gg g V L Y .4 % L G L 3 y; 4 b Z� N OIY w u�LM•O _ PN .aTl i.��( 0�1� LYNYY{ »L gNH'L ��5 �4�glC�ya 4 Yd O+ I Ol11 wwL~i. qY '�aL NNT2P ^ �L ;c ' w�y� 35 LtlN 09 C{T� .5-0 W M V'•7LyLLCwY.S{Op�•oNY!V t Ni i ■ L ■Y �NY W ��N4 ra MCCp OI��YLp � ++00�{0GGt� y�y M.5 KN� ` <M .tNO H% iN.y��01} P�GaM°O iV•Gr d !� O7C% W G La ++Y 8YC 1TG .gg NV .T�u Oqe et paC .a Lead Y N ^ C r 3N3w1� P L OG• L N e p, C:w� Y E N S L.r O6 A V a0 YP T N L L ry Oq q O N Y Y. a 4° rL� npy G Y 01 a91V G Y¢N Gr 6 ■M N SO.a{ +ytl �H6Y yr °C� 6�igaA.a � cs >MO gCDD Yq G M N L � %GL-. >N GLLY IL YY~ G. %&' Y� 4 °O Ow 3M Y y q i CC ■ C N 6NOIY offp A q �y ppNC P q N« 4Y OY M,Gq p °G,N �`aY °Z C 1 T t y NO% au E> 4 yN ~OO Q L 's, M m tL +aLO i Cam^ 4r� ' 6G OV+.q iP gLYLL. a.�g6CCQ }j Y`ygK' Cj r iPCCyi3 �yY� �wT°O {yN� PVC '0t�1Y 4 a VC�{4�. YS �4 Ypj�V NGCS.MMO a. p4 q Y q 4 4} C OI C 1. N L N^ MOM L�L P Y 4 3 y g Y G yy+�s ,y q T M ^ qq [T Oyu! LY9C q. LS' N'O V q Yw `YO L 3,f N W N YT OC Nr aTgi. - ��'} c_M ■pM40dL N{C�YY� DL <wN0 aCGW� s. iSt aYn FAN iu <a �ON�7 KLl G <H A9 WO. G:5 a sa VX 5f! `y FM .i p C ci a f I- Z lit v" ��OT T�`7=tl V�9� s r CCC p ,1j gg S� fftK aY''a,G��J M Y _ V sibs Wf- wa9wg N �L =:n . 40M s'�$ wG V ; .27 Y r 1q: p� }Ak Ow N NiC OSy w�rY � � y AS: i y y Y.yi 16 S A jYL ay ^ } Y Y y A Hipp.. f - uy�4,}ttM a g�a� Q�lcTy tr F +tia tN !� rpY� G 1l.�4'M YL.ii 7i i.N4 r�� t�q i f I- Z �i YY Ctag a ONGlY 6 N N q {�y1 y ONC C 4`N y M �C} Yyy i Y1 y N ®. u 9 J6 r y� r A L 0 �{ CN M Y C 4 O V L.rY Y M� r � 7 M .. ♦S�! � � �� I � �qy6+ � �.. � � � � a + O Y Y wI pyuw C �iyy9+ y ! i y Z w �NC Yg a Y•u� y oy Q -5 ' w1a 1 C --- YL S� y�� +.O Y.r. gd �O LYE yy�s !G yO�SyN 6L! K��� tN�V F �t ^tGY `•�',!Y_ ��O~ 6 ��C M.cY�CNC 6lLLY I a'aO'; t�,I. 4 y�� GC' N]M�> pv f�j !LY•eY �}1LOr.Y b � jsC Nla! LYpG `a` �,�qo �y�y YL ^' 4 '+ ■o L if *p}a -� `Y �6�~ O O W YY O: SNy p4 M O66 L M -lap {6� i,6¢Y6Stl ^ «OI -_rye q�y1♦ y Op i'Y M Y{7 ON�L Inu wy N !yV C9P ?fY �Hy O Ntpc� Yr•att� T �rL R y by tlOw.Y Y �> V� O'f ��✓ �� ��O a1Y,�ry L q u aai Y q yu ■. TyOC� 3+' �I L r K � w.C. q vC- INC 1V -17 � 9 I I lit ��OT T�`7=tl V�9� W CCC sibs Wf- wa9wg N G Oy ^O �r p� }Ak Ow rL ��S.YOUR � � ?Cyw_ss H N J -23 a S �i YY Ctag a ONGlY 6 N N q {�y1 y ONC C 4`N y M �C} Yyy i Y1 y N ®. u 9 J6 r y� r A L 0 �{ CN M Y C 4 O V L.rY Y M� r � 7 M .. ♦S�! � � �� I � �qy6+ � �.. � � � � a + O Y Y wI pyuw C �iyy9+ y ! i y Z w �NC Yg a Y•u� y oy Q -5 ' w1a 1 C --- YL S� y�� +.O Y.r. gd �O LYE yy�s !G yO�SyN 6L! K��� tN�V F �t ^tGY `•�',!Y_ ��O~ 6 ��C M.cY�CNC 6lLLY I a'aO'; t�,I. 4 y�� GC' N]M�> pv f�j !LY•eY �}1LOr.Y b � jsC Nla! LYpG `a` �,�qo �y�y YL ^' 4 '+ ■o L if *p}a -� `Y �6�~ O O W YY O: SNy p4 M O66 L M -lap {6� i,6¢Y6Stl ^ «OI -_rye q�y1♦ y Op i'Y M Y{7 ON�L Inu wy N !yV C9P ?fY �Hy O Ntpc� Yr•att� T �rL R y by tlOw.Y Y �> V� O'f ��✓ �� ��O a1Y,�ry L q u aai Y q yu ■. TyOC� 3+' �I L r K � w.C. q vC- INC 1V -17 � 9 I I YLYNa I. ti' •S u«i .'S N.H�o 'i V CC O y7r r.N a� •�tM� �r L p. Y � N p .. paw _3M �... ',NQ "Y\ppyy ti�.cp � N. Ye Mq Yp Yy nyyG i .G~C t F yQ� y y Y h p Y �' N .per Z Y Y Y V N` Y y w p ■C O So Iv, �,N,,,r� MO y w�tl4i 4tl �� N •�P�'� 3€ z s E � �r cm� SIC OikVD C1• �� � VkSM Y� � � t Y t �y,1��UYy� �� l tl G C Y Q► a I N ti `LO Z N N° i 6 6 y 9 Y Ln Y At O C = V p1 tly. Q O C Y M 0 'Alt L° M tlP9 �NW Lv7�.H 'p t Y+yy ciai°+� a Vtl' LYE p N &IHE pC! +a w .Y t%:r ..CM pCl$QY Y �.1 L L Y" � Y =\w \ 3 � � ■p c pp �a Egli tiE y�y Y'CCs. W CTYX t'/11. OIMO V w �^Otl OL YCV Y Y� y aT.CC� 1K�l. ~g'Q " CLYY Y`+Y L•y,�it y` a 0 w tl L L s 1 ++ le pt a Y Y' Hsi W G L Opp pLp' Y \i �' 21M 4y GY G "^ aY i YC 1M �� xL 'y0 _ec p\j p � W \ y � p Y y L tl 7 N` a nAY tJ • yµ`.• h9�- \N. wi ML 'JV� q.0 BOG iT. ° J. a `Ii �N gLC a�' 9 i M µ O Y' ypyp Qtl "g!� �' +Qr C Y. n.. CO �. y, Y j W M C: pl N p Y C tl A \• C O w ss ; pp N a �LS.n y wt. e Y P a'E by y p_ h ■ « ��„ ppp L. �i C O\ p H ,y"{�ry iZc t{1 TL _ CCU C� `e .a V� 8. ���0 CI µ LpOf. 'tx,�C Ot`y. Sf v w « .yOn. � }y� /pp �[ O v yC W His 'why Y AM6 ACCC gypp■■ Y1N yy gyaN AL{wJi �V Y�O p'Op pjY ad �yCp Y YNi{ t4q WN W JLi �° LR .76} �arS i4NtiCl i4i4� ;s 1�• `Cy,} V N 6U 0Y0 GM C p W� ad± Y� :r W N r 6 C�L9•�e �P.�P �N{'� {�L� q� � Ni n V� �,.`� OMN V y _ CV Y E lS,_, B'a aw� 41 G J�tYyl. Gi` Q�L {LKN.RR� x iN� `O V �� ~ �yO��� ° .v wf c ¢ jet > � z x O'v Lip G 71 �L aC \O YLO' '�]yt... 'y Cf�• �yn ? ^4p! x CC1� x0. �® w �rpL �$cy {4'/1 xW�m �.x� RRx �...,■o�LCt. �� _YRMO pY `tlpL j�E �$x ~�_ H �CT � "��+ iN. Ni.f ^� �p OiiW YPpe� N9 py�R UM E}p� 5es. y� .E�4 LYYL L� ON.Y �M� N~y``yy� iy�t11� 6N 0^ m p +r� N L W RYO L R N R 4 Y�! Y i N �± � v�p 7 C L °�� Y C �i ger117r tP -.'su �C tl f� Mkis..ti O 3 IFOr + V �I GM ` 0 x=• « 10 u «g o r va Y � a o g� g Y ■. LLYp M � 1� 1 . Off: -31 1 r R ~ LMN''4�1 tt ✓a iY R Y■Ga Gin. °~ a3 {Y1 _• `C �j. pp� 3� `�M q ~ vM pp `Mz �N °NCN Of 2w.G Yi y N sW -151 4,.Cnu 4y� C 9.L N Y W p> NCC T!y' L O C L V R R iS . L f. CC D ��f fpp4 r'r 2wYY. l..i t``V J IV-11* 1 q -31 1 r R ~ LMN''4�1 °C X R Y■Ga Gin. °~ {Y1 _• `C �j. pp� 3� `�M �I Tat3O� O x °NCN 2w.G Yi y N sW -151 4,.Cnu w e y�� C 1 ]. fpp4 r'r 2wYY. l..i 11 te, . �1 IV-11* 1 q r R ~ LMN''4�1 °C X R Y■Ga Gin. °~ {Y1 _• `C �j. pp� 3� `�M R� Tat3O� O x °NCN 2w.G Yi y N sW -151 4,.Cnu w e y�� C 1 ]. fpp4 r'r 2wYY. l..i 11 te, . �1 v� L� Q a s: L Y o� Ofj M Y� ,x C 4 2 N` L }3 Q N moo` c° o� +a �i god" P w V 1 `s Ni• � o y C L N + O �ry i �6w C� V tl G �$g L� '2v= a � •� yv .c. w u sort v • tl V 9 4 C ° • � � ova pp t QQ MMO vv .4x 4 6 iY~�l! ll �,,pVp � _ Ltl M V 33L � ~a'� V• NppYw V N Vw !ZIA Y Y N V � C � = NT Y A g C L R = lot Y Y V � lu t -'.I p 3. 20th 1r'.N3 a i a. 3 Np Myt iYY. y^ •�. a4�1�. 4N.aC all r s� ti N4 �gpe N'L' La^ Nex� yV 4 a� ` wo Yyy��e @pw tyY °' pz° d� qM C u °L wO/O,CY ,rSJ ppLJJ3Cw �`1 {. C N I IL a dA 4 N N q0. KCY * Y ec ACM NYj R� a 4•W it N M .O t0 Y� i 1!t a 1> + ' Y 1 1 C .1r� tl V 9 4 C ova .00 .4x E O _ a_ O Y Y N V � C � = NT Y A g C L R = lot Y � lu t -'.I p GJVL 20th 1r'.N3 I C, 45 ; ,r E E „�. 777777.�� T-4 7f CIT.y OF RANCHO GUCAIWONGA ; STAFF REPORT G DATE: November 26, 1987 TO: chairman and Rembers of the Planning Commiss;ej FROM: Brad Bullor, C44 Planner BY: Jlebra Meier, AsS+Ciate planner SUBJr-CT: ENVIROtlMMAL 8a ESSMENT AND TEATATIVE TRACT 13742 - AC & ;.-at s v . s on an �. es gn rev * a a lot tract 1 4.49 acres of land' within the .,-* Density l;r,ident +al,' istrict (2 -4 dwelling units per aces) locate n, i the south side of Arrow 1500 feet west of Sierra Madre APR 207- 342-12. ,,Associated with the project is a Tree Pmoval Permit. A, I. PROL,,TT AND `DESCRIPTION: =A. Action Requested : - ,.,Approval -ii: the subdivision map, conceptual p' of ' bull ing elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration For the deveTupoent of 17 si -iplo family homes. B. Project Density: 3.8 dapsflina unit's per acre. C. Surrounding Land Ps and Zonln� North -- single am y esi-den'tiai; Low Density Residential (2 -4 y;units per acre) South - Single i-�atailj Residential, Low Density ResV- -ntial (2 -4 dwelling ;:.nits per acre) East - Single Family P sidential; low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Single Family Residential; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units.per acre) D General Plan Designations: ro ec s e = ng a Faintly Residential; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dAlling units per acre) North - SVigle Family Residential; Lo,v Density Residential (2 -4 dwellin; snits pnr acre) South - Single Family Residential; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - .tiygle Family Residential; Low iencity Residential U -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Single Family Residential; Low Dena,ty Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) ITEM 0 PLANNING COWIsS'T(iV( ,'ST F gSpORT � Ti 13742 - AC b C t5VELOPMENT, LTD. f Novel ")er ,T,B, 1987 = .. Page 2 C �f s E. Si, a Characteristics :'".� - � `�'? site is pre..ently vacant with' an average slope a1 "per`cent frost north to soufi� The project is sur, ounded. by established single faai ?y rasidences. Soak, >,i inxtifi.cant vegetatio4 will be "removed for daweispr,er_. Alsa, iwo 18 inch trees will be removed fort- which the apJlicant has, filed"an tcompanying Tree Removal :P&Iflit. AKALYU,, A. General: The protect consists of 17 Single faoily homes op Tots ing in s.pc Pram 7,6W square feet to 0L ow squrrt , feet with an average lot, size 6f 8,700 square feet in sii ThP - appl'irant proposes three product types with two arOitectural elevations each. Homes range in size from 1,276 -- square feet to 1,672 square fee #�. Plans "9 and "6" are two stety homes and Plan *Cu is single story. B. Design Rev':ew Commutes: The Committee .',Fmerick, Mcf440, Coleman) revieewwed t%Ts project on September 17, 1987. rhey recommended af.proval of the project with the foliowyng co ,;ditions: 1. Provide z greater jar tition in l4Z widths wltt a minirma�t lot width of 60 feet. ' Ats has Lem provided on revised ptans, 2. Side and-rear elevations of all .ructures shall be upgraded through the use of k;rime, detail's, etc. �. The architect has proi;�:ded sketahes (set attached exhibits) to illustrate 360. degree artt;vtectural detail. 3. A decorative block wall shall be prnvided on the corner lot at Arrow end `7inmar. Any walls, j retaining or free standing, within the front i setback shall be of a deco? -1Wve mater4al. iI lhis - tor;ttion is inrludbd is the attached Resolution. C.• : Technical PWew Coma tea: She Cearaittee has reviWed the pr53ec an d all recommended-conditions of <; approval, the , project is consistent witiJ art applicable standards and ordinances. i ' F ''.�POR i J PI-i ir� Al lT 1 A �S C�� YEi.D�MENY, LTD,, - 1pvember 2ar,.146 i Pa, e 3 Y wayef�or the�ecPns�re tto ofestr�e�� ., � �t-or- redrto btair, oft siiz mute, _ crest of a project site (see fk consiatin¢ f' a curb r p7 use:, "e s deg al* alonit Prontag4 . adjitent n+esary for lraAk edes :an s4fet Y. The 906% Pion Ma Act rettirec the, City vo tondemn tine pto`iiprort:y nee ssy t insult required irrov►s f``theirl�?lpe' is una�be to �btai <h, thw Property throes nee �'oh"�; er i:he�,�oan�i ti'on-` aarst b waive t. 71se P,s�nd�ng Co issicp doer. no (ta�.�tlse mnthortity to ' _ pommit� the CG y to ca G.4WaVon ,,proc dings � go NoVeib-%r 1� L 1967,' the City 'Council refiewed the issue of the pons bTj 4 condemnation :a obtain the oecessvy rigid -of way, and approved r concept. . fherefothe rood- ; ; ff t'he deviioper ja unable to o taft` the r,_ecessary rightr —` -way, the City woul-d ini�tiatO 'the appropriate proceedin,1 for comdxeration. D. Overhead Utilities: A conditfott „has "en included in the pro ec approve - Resolutfan (N um(' -Ar � 1.5 under Engineering) ronuil ing that an in -lieu fee ?ae rigid as contribution to ths_ future undergroundinD of existing overkead Utiliti:ss' located in the utility easri _ _ �rithin the existing tract west of the project bourt�iary.� ,equirerient is - consistent with current Commissio icy, v' rifer, the Commission may "Pt to consider an exempt%n in,t s ease, baeauce 4t appears u� ;kely that the utiiittes w 1 ba undergroundia An the foreseeable future fo;7,the folIowing reasons: 1. The property td", the west e,l s' alrzady developed, therefore will not contrihuti funds io the - ur lerg.,ounding,` 2 , R ;c:rtionel funds would, : be necessary to cony >ert ihd underground the services to, the.,existing homes l,._ Me west, and a IMs nearly sreets the criteria of Item "F" of t�e policy exemptions (Section 7 of the Policy Reiolw;:ion, see Exhibit "I "), except teat -the uIllity lines are'not yZO feet or more from the "light -of -way line of a,? pedal Boulevard. _ :rr -F 4iropr;ental" -As: essment: Part I of fte tniti:ai ; MOy has beat Ana y e apP can;. Staff ha, comoletad Part II of thb N. wntal Checklist result ar foun nignific.nt impacts"on the _ J project. . i �' F k a - TU �. Ut i TT T, _ III. PACTS FT WNW This p `eect is consistent with�, tre &evral �ar , x a _dttrij.i- - ai a a aceet properties, or aus ey` igni i rh a #O a Rpacte. The pra}oswd uee, buildiing design, f end srctbdi�ri 4; tdgetIer , with all ; re_nded conditions of approval, t,�vT,iarice with the agglfcable regulations Qf the IY, CtiRE°�V : ilsis:iem is keen advertised as a rLbTlc hearing ort :` "sparer - -, ps'�erty postfdl, and notices wera s '�'"to1. U proF -aat,r en's wii A 300 feef of the project 0r s1te. - a Y, RECOM�tE} ATTQN: c f� recam�rsds that the Planning Commission approve Mauve Tsacto I3'4 subject to the corWitions of appri�al, through adoption of the attached Resolution, and issuance fr + of a Ne�-ttive declaration. \ � ReSp ly su t€ r8 P' City Pl aver O13: : to - i Adtachm6ts- EXfi tit "A "' - Tree Removal Permit _ Exhibit "V -`free Removal PI arf . €xh . bit "C" - Land, -cape Plan s Exhibit "D*P - Cjnceptual OradTtig x Exhibit `E" - Site Plan Extiabit 171 - - "ation Type A - Ir Exhibit "W ,tvL�jvetion Type 8 ff:nit "Gi" - Elevation Type C EP3bit `I" - Undergrounding Utilities Policy Resolution of Approval with Conditions ` { - a City of Tree Removal Plarmit Cucamonga DEVE O MENT Ordinance Rio. 276, pertaining to tha preservation of troea on privats�, ,rbperty, requires that no pomp =amove or relocate any woody plants in exec,.; `f fifteen (10) foot 16-holght and having a singlatrunk : ircumference of fifteen (15) Inches or more add muIM- trunks having a circumference of thirty (30) isrches or more (measured twenty-four (24) inches from ground level), without first obtaining a. Tres Removal Permit from the City. LOCATION OF SUBJECT SITE. NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPMONEOFAPPLICANT: .__� � C LaVei��a,n n 226 2 Ae�Inen Springs Road, Suite: 270, Di+s^,and Enr cA 91765 i NAME, ADD?HESS,TELEPHONEOR PROPERTY OWNEFI-OfothorthviaVIllcan* same REASONS FOR REMOVAL (attach nscnssary sheets): and verimetar va.11 cans a for jract 13742. PROPOSED MET$ QD OF ftl_MOVIAL: Ch *za and Au 7 doze APPLICAKrrS SIGNATUR DATE This applicat5mi shall 1; a pip:, ,Mast Indicating taication of all trees to be removed end ,ert"alnsd. The species, nvnber, and sizeof 3ht• tress to be removed shall be so designated. If a tree Is diseased, iihen a writ0n otatement ?ram a licensed arborlat Mating the nature of the disaas" shall be required. APPROVED By: AAL PLA.NNM DWISM 0 DENIED Reasons: IWA ME A x I 7 f -RACY -....At pL� ti 9 MB m ►_�°� rte' i�sf cqj r � �l f 1224 � j N, MH cnT cF PLANNING DC--AWN EXHIBIT =_ SCALE n i A .7 e Y A. 79: p } r L L _ c. O t � IIz; O �l f 1224 � j N, MH cnT cF PLANNING DC--AWN EXHIBIT =_ SCALE - tiYV - r 7y c 4 m K mK ' na Mf J PLA47 LIST 1iCKJ1OAMaAR 57YPACKW+j AMCnK;AN.5:Tf ET GUM F.aTIVAI SIR L Irlt O VIMAR AY W Br THE Cn ♦ Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHRMS AOAPANTHUS AFAK:ANUS T <m N DA r my -; AWRAEA.4 . pm ,,, •., tp ,,,ice i`. zy \ S 9> LA..fANAMCNTE,VMNS >;ffpw, P'W[e - tiYV - r 7y c 4 m K mK ' na Mf J MYOAOAEEWD T.MF 7KOJtLLgN' rnett trtT CpeC CWA . ;. Typical Parkway Section - f H C71TY CF p- 't rFEM: J A RANCHO CLJCAM TIPLE PLANNING UVIS `vi EXHIBIT= S&LEt 0_ l S PLA47 LIST 1iCKJ1OAMaAR 57YPACKW+j AMCnK;AN.5:Tf ET GUM F.aTIVAI SIR L Irlt O VIMAR AY W Br THE Cn ♦ Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHRMS AOAPANTHUS AFAK:ANUS LA Y Or THE NV E NEMEAO A S" DA r my -; AWRAEA.4 . FORTK%GHT LAY RAPHICLIP" "JACK EVANS' wOtAN HAW THORN Gmwo rams GAZA',./ 4UNGLpW' IRA-.1 4C GAZANFi LA..fANAMCNTE,VMNS LANTANA MYOAOAEEWD T.MF 7KOJtLLgN' rnett trtT CpeC CWA . ;. Typical Parkway Section - f H C71TY CF p- 't rFEM: J A RANCHO CLJCAM TIPLE PLANNING UVIS `vi EXHIBIT= S&LEt 0_ l S t f _ z Ca in . r i s t t 4 a r i � —� z• A .g J ; Q r. b f - :pi• � L ; TLL _ _�:_-- -�'_ne t 'j• as =, NORTH CI'T'Y OF rrEt�t= 775749 lift PLANNING DPI19ON EXHIBIT- / _SCALE. i r9 l NHS ,7 b Z � « -g T 1� ' A Y T. VIA NOM CITY OF /074-?' RA1 HO C�A?VKX MR..: TM' LE: i r9 tom— ■■ �r FSAR ELEVATION its M. 144■11 aesu Maim _4 mmh o CITY OF rrEM., 7r X�,rXZ RANT _G CHO CLEkMON A TrrU- PLANNING DI TSM EXHIBIT: SCALE;--.- C— I tfLi ELEVfTKM A-1 its M. 144■11 aesu Maim _4 mmh o CITY OF rrEM., 7r X�,rXZ RANT _G CHO CLEkMON A TrrU- PLANNING DI TSM EXHIBIT: SCALE;--.- UMTmN E"T, A 9-1 4., we R*HT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION LEFT ATION ✓ NORTH d CITY CF 'ai-/97 RAINCFU CUCANKXNGk TME, M-AINNNING MWON XHIBFr- SCALE-.- 0-1( rN yi1136ii 11 .- ..N� ■Ilt�ftll _ .4�_.i \! satial'i!m.y..1. LEFT ELEVATON 0 RE4R ELEVATION j RAINOU CLUANIONGA PLANNING D€ ISI I EXjjIBjI- SCALES { _ �r►�nv�r �: -a LEFT ELEVATON 0 RE4R ELEVATION j RAINOU CLUANIONGA PLANNING D€ ISI I EXjjIBjI- SCALES RES ILUTION NO. 87 -96 A 1'tESOL6TICN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION .Jr THE CIT.v OF RAK40 CUCAMONGA ESTAGLISHING A REVISED POLICr Kn THE UVDERGROUYDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 86 -77 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho C:•samonga wishes to rep'aal Re °oliUtion No. 86 -77 which was adopted on the 24 r), day of = May, 198h and establish the rewised policy contained herein; ;�- WHEAEAS, the Planning CtAmiS §ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote a more aesthetic and, desirable working and living enviro(:rtent,.within the City; I and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to inform property 'r owners and developers of the City goal. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved and established that alII developments, except those contained it Sai;0 on 7 and any others specifically waived by the Planning Commissiop, shall be responsible for rindergi- unding all exi'sting overhead utility lines including the removal of the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development as follows: 1. Lines on the project side of the street*: a. Said lines shall be undergrounded at the daveloper's expense. b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that undergrounding is imoractical at present for such reasons as a:short length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not undergrounded adjacent), a heavy roncentrrtion of services to other users, disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall pty an in -lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. c, The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one -half the cost of undergrounding from future developments as they occur an the opposite side of the street, 2. Lines un the o site side of the street from, the ro e-:t: The Developer s a pay a ,ee tote City for one-half the annum« per action 6. 3. Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with Section I a ve an e e igi a or reimbursement or pay additional fees so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one -half the total cost'of undergrounding the dines (n both sides of the st ^eet, tr 4. Po1a lines containin 66i�I or lamer electrical tines: A.Tl 'dines shalt to un ergrt�un a cr tn- Zeu or 4r d —in accordance wwiit-fi sectian 1; 2 or above, except - or 66 KV or larger electrical tines.. G 43 5. Limits of ResocnsiW_ities: a. In -lieu fees shall be based upon the length of `the propert being deg ±eloped from property line to property line (U* center of 'Jdjacent streets for corner properties). b. Undergrounding 6411 includ! the entire project frontage and extend to: (1) the -first existing pole off -site from t;,ie projrect,boundaries (across th�,'sir et for corner properties), �2) a`n-: pole irected at a project bo -,,mO Y (across the stmt for corner properties ), or (3) an existing pole within 5 feet of a project boundary,:. except a a corner. 6. Fee Amount: The Mo t for ,i i -ii+eu fees shall. equal the length (per 5eqtlon e times the unit amount as establiskn by the City aeuP :cif ba >4 upon information supptiud by the utility companies ana-�, ; r1ated periodically as deemed necessary. 7, Exemptions: The following types of projects shall be, exempt from this po —Ticy: a. The addition of functional equipment to existing del +e''opments, such as: loading docks, siios,`satel'�ite dishes, antennas, W,er tanks, air conditioners, cooling' towers, I fe of an outdoor storage area, parking and loading areas, block walls and fences, etc. b. Building additions ar new free standing builC`,tgs of le�s that' E5% of the floor area of the existiij buiiding(s)'vn the s� assessor's parcel, or 5,000 square feet, whichever is less. c. Exterior u pgradirrg„ or repair of existing developments, such yasl . , reroofing, additioni of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipmeni1v screening, repainting and exterior finiahes, etc, d. Interior tenant improvements apd.non- construction ^" S. e. The constrpction of A single family residence on an existing parcel. f. Existing_ovrrhoad utility lines located in trails, alleys, and utifity easemerts with a heavy concentration of sevvices to adjac�Mt developments, ',�bd the utility lines are SO or more from the right of way line of a ^ill Boulevard, g. Residential suhdivisio�S of four or fewer Vngfe family residential parcels, where the utility line- extend at: least 600' bffsite from !both the project boundaries and the adjacent propert },As not likely to CIon;ribute to f►iture undergrounding. All references to streets „shall also mean aileys, railroad "or channel rights -of -way, etc. s AP'PROO&U,AND 1tWMM TW'S loth PLANNING F SON OF 'Of CITY OF ftAt c"p cucA �lm7 A �' La y r4 ATTEST_: I Brad Buller', OV[,rty Secretary of thj& P1an►ing CommiSSion of tFre City of Riinet,i Cucamonga, do twvby certify that th! foregoln?g Resolution toag dulj and regal "arly introduced, pas , and adopted by the Planning Coeeissi -A of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, ut a ragdlatr araeting of the PlanMrrg ComM lion held F- on the 10 day of June, 1987, by the following vot,;..to -wit: RYES: vtX�1MISSiOM t : EMERICK, mm 6,' WMIEL N4ES: COMISSICNEPS: TOLSTOY ABSENT: COMHI�SIONERS: "ME`: . rt A9STApN: COI IISSXONEkS: BLAXESI Ei { I I r ,, s 1701 -02 011-25 -87 PC Agenda*. 4 L] RESO1'1TION NO. r A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMIONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13742, A PESIDENTIAL SUBDIVIS #ON AND DESIGN REVIEW OF A 17 LOT TRACT ON 4.49 ACRES OF [.AND IN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED ON THE 1OUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROU71, 5501 WEST OF SIERRA MADRE - APN 207 - 342 -�12 A. Recitals. (i) A.C. & C. Development, Ltd. has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13742 as described in the title of this Resolution, Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 25th of November, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, it it hereby cetermined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Ra^chc;�i:u,- =nga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby spedfficall finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. [cased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on November 25, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the south side of Arrow Route, west of Sierra Madre with a street frontage of 199.63 feet and lot depth of 631.44 feet and is presently unimproved; and (b) The property to the north, south, east and west of the subject site is existing single family residential (c) The applicant has filed an accompanying Tree Removal Permit for the removal of two 18 inch trees that must be removed in order to allow site improvements. AOL 3. Based upon the sits *antiai evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced publi hearing .ind upon the specific findings J facts set forth in px,agraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: V l 7771 PLANNING, COMM ISSION RESOLUTION NQ. TT 13742 - A.C. b C. DEVELOPMENT, LTD. November 25, 1987 Page 2 F (a) That �fJitative tract is consistegt with the " General Plan, Development L-0de, end specific plans-, = and (b):': the design or improvements of the tentative tract ir, consistent with the General Plan, Developq'W Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of F development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and ' W) The f%htative tract is not likely, to cause serious public hedith problems; and (f) fie design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easew.nt acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Thi) Commissidh hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California En ironment)i Quality Act of 1970 and, further,, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Basr:d upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragrapl 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Staidard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division (1) Side and rear elevations of all structures shall include architectural trim details representing 360 degree architecture. (2) A decorative block wail shall `be provided on the corner lot at Arrow Route and vinmar Avenue. Any walls, retaining or free standing, within the front setback area shall be a decorative material. Engineering Division (1) Existing Overhead Utilities PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. IT 137,49 - &C. & C. DEVELOPMENT, LTD. November 25, 1987 Page 3 k ad Arrow poute An in -lieu fee as contribution to the f"utr a undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to recordation of the final reap. The fee shall be'; the full City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. b. Lines within the u lillien y eas t west of Lots i 10 through 17 - An f e as contribution to the future underg nd.g of the existing overhead utilities (t ommunications and electrical) within the ut ty easement west of Lots 10 through 17 sha b paid to the City prior to the recordati of the final map. The fee shall be one -ha the City adopted unit amount tines the len h of the project frontage. (2) The developer shall consfi Oct street improvements on Arrow Route along the fl gage of the "Not of Part" parcels to the west ,if the project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (3) The developer shall massy a good faith effort to acquire the required: off -site prop%rty interests necessary to construct the required street improvements, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property_ interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off -site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement rf the appraisal 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. t ; a W vw- F7 LOTION NO. PLANNING 00"Am", R MN TT 13749 -' kt.' & C. t�tkOPMENT, LTD. ftv;i6� 25, 19'97 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOTED THIS 25TH DAy OF NOVEMBER, 1967. PLAWURG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry t. We aIrmau ATTEST: Brad Sul Mr.-, 1, Brad,.-Buller,.- Deputy Secretary of the planning coluission of the City of Rancho Cucamotoga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was &.,Iy and.,. i2gularly introduced, passed, a'nd--)adopted by the Plannirg Comission W tll("", City of Rancho Cecamonga, at a regular-meeting of the Planning Commission he!4-- on the 25th day ol;November, 1987, by the following vote-tolwit: AYES: CO*�tSIONERS.- NOES: COMMISSW-�79S: ABS'31't ft.SIONERS: ^ p i's Y O W Y iY 6 C O 7 a C r N O Y C N U I SA g`Tr$N± s � m + Ow- y y. �L,I Zy OON lam •^mwi i +V a� Yi qw V6' c Y jiu N 3 uYFw.cdYw w I a .�UQ° ^ N Y sWC p > Q Qe O�wY L Y V q% e CY leer. Y■O yY iOy�, 1p Y +ayC >n V/y��Y� all pC rpXL CYr dM iyy� C•�. �1�(iG��� �LY. 7.�g ~ ~iQ.�Oli ^6L O.� X..w 'OMN V i' Ypo Y{('{yJ�1 ■ Y a�iMY t1i 6qY. fr VN ^�M ! C04 CY"NCIt. LLLL''' wY�4'Yld% e�b/ }ouM 4 ^f. 21Lw' M Sq0 ~. =�01 a *C ye p�L�YNV .(V f�i1 �C•v Y +�G N��Y N N .��N w ■. RYY pN.G yRN =-`L '000 ^p {y,.1O `LO YN `ro�Y 0N^ y�Y (iiNCEy g =3 Sa N n s N. tttTTTg c o +r3 l g, p~N Y{+.CC m� C�p+ A•LY^ a^ acpQ - ,�I i�puy� YM TEE w L Cca wY V O Y_YN N R. ��� 'O OU ^y u0lSR q �i y y d Y' • G p� 'Y'wM C ��rr Y AsL� FNC �_V�rn]y. gcica'$ Y \T Y p� 9C rY � p YOa �CYN 00 CY 1 WWa C - C 4n—ayuv Z G� N ti ` F Q OO nN �CF ` YtYw wY6G M6514�OYy NYO 4 =04 4% 4% r 4n yY, s V W 7 O ��YMQ ^La�6 W �' '�I ~ � M�t�. � O O 9d •YN��rTtl� y N �1 9.: CMYM Y �• Y C C; it ww K�►2 N I�N.�C.� 2 el H N 51� Y I 1 IK H nI X'4 ti a LU R .n pV q�w PIE N V. $y°, N 4 p C i C 04: b1 n',9 `y LTR� V K AL MIL. ��DL Y.i11D.�M ^aV U D V R� U VVpp^ qq.64it'��4 G6NyN� M y. �y� d p� . W ' 01 OOO- L Bit x23 f \Vj,1 4�u Age bu YL c/L i �� RYA N�p� E � E�1��g�; � i 4-51"bi YTL YM •+eta wfq V IIpp��1aL 4tja` ofpp l� ��.��'� �UD N A ^o�Sa awao L N twY. ij vfi C�� ^Q C�y yrRw 4�� rpG� y @Uw��YV gBCD "U'M 2 :p_a4 Wb�'y y��e W Ap g"" L. ?Y y9 �q�q' 'Cam, S3-t; ADY�� }� YIQL, ^R2q• f'f` V39 rC N A YX��`'ip} t �.t. 51 gip ^ qfi`Y WQ4/vM Y14� LL 'g Y.o+�cc '3y T S. OYYiAA - � � ■a�` Vy a � _gM C:D rt i li y. 3c pa Q 6 yi =H L RS -5.3 'iDi ^ V ° Y kgw V� ^L .ANA ►-�wo i. - »:�' Yos� ^ <u �ri li i�5.v w���g' 1 of aaw�L D�w U.! t+ ^ MLOMUY f,�975Y XWOF gar "I YViY UpN YYy�V. ` 41 V V H i L9y CRM Y• ^yG • iVYw ° +z.9 ix • x V.S ] i w G M 1^, sip CO nt �$ Y N H d > L �s C V N `1 L1'LQLL L V gt'VA �N Y6NCq �`�+AK C.L r w. e f U 4 C M ^� Mg4 w. Yg V_ffj�j y' .3�,y^ rJ r L --4p N °piwi ?q. O H M W «L _C j T *O C e t 1 y 4 e"- C4 ` L° $ 1.�Gtx gg yy^. .w• .-II =tl��_� --R N� Aa¢l4 yUyY ofYM� Cw ^�. �4� CY�G yt� d.N{^;/j syylyrrrr �1►w Cp Y{}yj�p y��N`xiJ �*�iM ■ #f V ~YN rO, MOA M.i f�1 Y4.A LD N y� �� y�.w D�� i4FNN Mw W ri 4LACis t;m C G es c/L i �� RYA N�p� E � E�1��g�; � i 4-51"bi YTL YM •+eta wfq V IIpp��1aL 4tja` ofpp l� ��.��'� �UD N A ^o�Sa awao L N twY. ij vfi C�� ^Q C�y yrRw 4�� rpG� y @Uw��YV gBCD "U'M 2 :p_a4 Wb�'y y��e W Ap g"" L. ?Y y9 �q�q' 'Cam, S3-t; ADY�� }� YIQL, ^R2q• f'f` V39 rC N A YX��`'ip} t �.t. 51 gip ^ qfi`Y WQ4/vM Y14� LL 'g Y.o+�cc '3y T S. OYYiAA - � � ■a�` Vy a � _gM C:D rt i li y. 3c pa Q 6 yi =H L RS -5.3 'iDi ^ V ° Y kgw V� ^L .ANA ►-�wo i. - »:�' Yos� ^ <u �ri li i�5.v w���g' 1 of aaw�L D�w U.! t+ ^ MLOMUY f,�975Y XWOF gar "I YViY UpN YYy�V. ` 41 V V H i L9y CRM Y• ^yG • iVYw ° +z.9 ix • x V.S ] i w G M 1^, sip CO nt �$ Y N H d > L �s C V N `1 L1'LQLL L V gt'VA �N Y6NCq �`�+AK C.L r w. e f ,�l fh"\y L090 CO q� V Ca_u O�OCOC r�cr fY L +fO+ t V i W C C 4C YM uB , .cY� ~� �Y Oq C� YC�L co �Y� �° .�{, •sn� a Y .Was +u v0,.. �w Nr N'.�G3 n ,�® F- U 7Y LL"o�� YS Y a4vo -1513 S � -x s N�4 w N Y 014 �MU a 7 N p w P O X M _9 O. o C N • y Y w•� L aYQ P Lvp Q M G M TyJ N N Y pp N 'N Y+ a. C` C N LLB �L CN01. 11p ^� 00z VyN�pWV � ~ ON �L NYt 'y YG�L, pp+YN �� R�•19G 7t YIV W.YM ++N ipp. tIQ 4L-4p%-yy Gy QLNat p�TaWw �� ta-Z _�_ a_ .. N� _ +NN 163, a� 9aa °aa€ X;t� 4�y1`�� w.. ©�x^8 "oit a'Y �,i�i+i�_a'L. oCYG�a YYVOR YN�p '^Fwr x�NCCa LgOY� A1�i T.O pN ` W Y sCC Y Oy« P�1 G= -2 L O s iC N q` l0 +L�o tC• � � >� O.`6 �LY�� ^y `LN01 ��yC ~� VMyS O p g y yO�1 tp r y eC_ Poi LwY l b3.i CM �.Fp i 9 gvN. N` Lo L ' �i C NNYi ^NGY 6 i•^ ,lsY. D y 1yp{j Is I p �f' p1+ w'• O L AAA +Y ]� YpY'1M� Gp�� tf • ^f �1 QQY i Y ^~ Y -.i _C �Y.W iI i ap�Lyypr� tpyyYN.�1yyyyap61YC Y+ V r cNM g OC YN 4 +C Y M +� c Nb .L . <1� N Y G i� nMo � . ►W ` - .ws' si3uC .�.�a1�'31q i ^r$d y L r q 6 7 0 1O . L h O- s L �YN 1 c°t1w tic .90 a � � iAgga �iuY + Y Y ~O cu V.Ga ^3CL Ol pM G NCT +•r C TPA IA i Yr� Q3` 9-0. 1iA � N N OY some � {��GU11'• 4.5 A6 LA w 0 i •IONI Y a + G y. N C O -Z �+ 1� O C 1. ".� �^."i• al,., «iii ya :T-k Kyk�R L W C Y A� e� +L Q 4 N 1y{,0�� Y Cld� 40CN > +O �CC'QL °aYL uy$ a WO. i A r M_ �5G1 Y 4 0 ��19 s LCy V Q 1=. V O.S 0 ryMU O t Q 1• q N U 9 ' V W4! L C A N� w 4-a S t? N p N {{�� C SaNCy N� 4 L.. �1 ■1.., CC Yom. C i L;, iL •LF W+� N NY V YL- �.0� y +.� >Wy 1L,C 4 pMMp CC�L Y� Vv t4. 'z` O.w N y.Oww' Yp Y •� M + * Y lT t Y Y y 0 0Y a •�• M w W Y �� r.. PM 9 ii A UNNN _S G N R+r G =t iVV Y e�!/Y V ~00 �1d p��� C ��W '�•yJY '�N+ q+ 4`9' Y }1r cO�Y a� '� >y 1yV L4Q {Oyy9 01F L C`~ _O Y+ 1L 4 Oi11r A/ N i v G 9 „C� t p. C� �L1 � C^ O L • 0 + �1 SC L y Q' +Y u_G L1N V +V NOM N S§ �C Yp�O N 4.ON. L G C�•r + L 1F `C C {�{11 �An� N X10 C yV'�L � • M V C^ � O ly de V C Oar+'LI Y.� E. �fyyCi' r� V �yyG �c[CO: yaW.4 7ZYG is R.1t� LY90 U aCa. r Y N iOjYYuO M�Y -a� C aP ¢t6 •[.'3.aio <iwa3' > csa l"n rY-aN :cis to �o N.�.e .G6i�. G <. „�e av �'ni2�u °d .s w ;l i M �� c1 l° 0 2c 1J Y `�C Els'yT w c tl TiS.N. Y V V D &gSC ■'Y ar �Lf 1jS « 1j. 9 u � 4 4 Q ^�o!: lit �.. >v , ha- Y5 'u'Z"a . L ��Y dl C `N. pYUp l � l�mcllY yyy r �YL�.1 1!.•��{L VC L C w CC yy u.^ gat run- JikwLLLp �yNy Y N Y^ 8 rN ° ist �G ��� �:✓ A xC O.M L�y.��y �CYL '' ~4' ��4� p} �LIL Vf6 RiS I�t♦ i �i�y�� wT mY I + cwe r- &c �C tI G AL X11 ■yy �lyC}. ■'Y ar �Lf OYY ?'��a11 1j. UC~4L � 4 4 Q at Y ]�Vpp� 2-K 4! CC U l � c p N r �YL�.1 1!.•��{L VC C «A N S f,% �yNy C 3TGRp ° � �G ��� �:✓ A xC 33 �i�y�� wT mY R o T « ^_N V z" j C Y y 6 a L V CNC �V QLp wC Y ^ f p L N 4 "Z e■ C S w tlw' %-1 r V Nom` ^ gE� �p C�Yageq ..; ► �tY Y V N C Y LNYD.0 Y M Y � +✓'� L wYL C w. A1w� w i w'T C cwe r- &c �C tI G AL X11 ■yy �lyC}. ■'Y ar �Lf OYY ?'��a11 1j. O G � 4 4 Q .A..a 6p ]�Vpp� 1F �ai� CC U l � c p N r �YL�.1 1!.•��{L VC C «A N S f,% N Y1 Y� O $fig M~ w��s iw N L Y g�Qr L+ LC I&€ No A�AL'«Ilr OCIS V^ _ L 6C pC 3w� LYL �C tI G X11 ■yy �lyC}. �Lf OYY ?'��a11 1j. O G Q .A..a a .^ CC U l � c p N �yNy C p¢rr.pMyY {�. =0 N A xC V l a w_ 4 w L N �Y► Y�L a O C CC P�C 4!x 4 � 3 Y L L O r LO N yy } a^ R N 4RM C MM�p� c TT M ■ Op..! ®p6G� �3wb L w C � Y Y N C tYi Y Dj C V Y w 0 V w' R C YL. T Y i'L+ V Y C Y « IT y y�ld 9CC E N 4 L yYj L ANA 0 p N A Y O Y yNyyy { yya€ 6 $ L yQ S � L �y~Yi O'V d' L a t w,y W �u 4 Noon C uN�v v } � w3 L" R pLLp � 44n p L YC i � 4 Y L O L• U •_ ��� >G�O�� L�� is .. � {j � C��? pN cL w ^ 4ia C IL All O� W d 'c hill ^Y 1 S d��� 4■ o4■ M y C w� N t ° O,6yyYC C ~c a ■8 ~L aY{vn Vy Y N« , NN N Y G■ w �O wO� yp.O (wQ]p�C DoL tltlYu `yyyYQY= C C c CC sy N a Yia�.= �'O _ � � Y GM C p yyd � � � ■ _ O yO O O u ` ; � C C 6L w C O u+ g 'Y•:� Eo tws Cs qfiCt' u'Cyyy�Et }v D d i 00� Z3 rM `O W, ZN KM 6Lp d1 a $ t n Le ,,°,«jy�yp«p{� +N ° Stu Y ICY. L CNY ��. Y y°Y V. n OV� C4 MNr]yV�. �96. YV6 °bl C M•�°r SE CY^ 6 K ° ^— YghC1 ytU!'Y ®ly. ` a N a C ttcL N y ,y C i «:'� iCO CYCy'. «i ■+ �` VN� YGfD yGq��O� �aLa � LV {�° ^ L S' °.� LL�'� �6M�� .... a'S �pY L° IL0Z N O J r y a V Y y d H tl M N 6r� y {. ° .5 w — O C p 4 N N vG= «DO M C�, Y p �~� p. a �. '� ".TL M �SY� G 01^ 1 V tY t °Y } N+ -M69-1 1 ^ Cp ° d YLW� L y, s I tpi CpCS �� p� r MO.C�d VyU CO. �Cy°Npi sVuCTO VM d � {u, .°�y.V+� LRUy.N j%pu C�c� N Z ~Y Y YL N c Vsd ^ 4 4wN y� Yv- Cd N y. i 1`°. pC NC ^9i -4 O� � �1VOM NGY 'LC V`6M!} x'gS Y y� VO � 2A Q Ci 6�■r� L WNp WuC A� G7�S= aSY TAW Y N a '�aooy� a E Y Y YW B � O Y O OpY4 � ^ V a YEg° 0o Y Y. w V O �4 1� ^OI� T VN Y .Bog .Sa$ was L�� u Qj.% 6.�C p� fY� $'CpL aV O W d � ..AUK =L6 A� MCC Y N a a E Y Y YW B � OpY4 � ^ pY uN� yN 1� ^OI� T Y .Sa$ ea L�� u Qj.% 6.�C L A� MCC a Zy _ .~°- .u. Cy� u 4y��yy OIy N � 'O 1E _a t �+ g� 316 2. ~� L Lypy NR3. tl ; YY� QM�01 y,�SM GI YMrC rwtldY qL YM6~ L Y +C�p. p� za yI.0 O o na Y N a a E Y Y B 1 C.Va 4 k`o e i c u u M � � C Y 4� A V Y Y 2�� s pL.x v YI MCCA VC Fa c GI �I NI T Y O iV C a gJ C V i Y N 4Y p� C Oyy�� Nit w `V w 4 � 6 L Y� ur ;, tp Iz .y Z w 4! C N C� pW w Y 4r spiv a ci' roM IS .r • v 3�V N » MJ L p L + Y ■ E � S CC C G V ^ a 4.Jw O d BMW �v L p pp Y a� V N i�YaYy C�C N u W K O M � V 1 � Y .�s 4 q !� SI, N i L X she �w '�i,p LO'�c P �s M ~�Cpi uY GSNp ..lvv�y +M �aQ L YC �VwY LQ '�pC� O•NFEZ. 4�Ni ro.. of �p nd N000 YNYO. C ■ Y Y� ,p +i M V i.r W 4Y4 i ryye P C C C f 0 N y C dNU N'dW +r Kd Ll 1 r' C.Va 4 k`o e i c u u M � � C Y 4� A V Y Y 2�� s pL.x v YI MCCA VC Fa c GI �I NI T Y O iV C a gJ C V i Y N 4Y p� C Oyy�� Nit w `V w 4 � 6 L Y� ur ;, tp Iz .y Z w 4! C N C� pW w Y 4r spiv a ci' roM IS .r • v 3�V N » MJ L p L + Y ■ E � S CC C G V ^ a 4.Jw O d BMW �v L p pp Y a� V N i�YaYy C�C N u W K O M � V 1 � Y .�s 4 q !� SI, N i L X she �w '�i,p LO'�c P �s M ~�Cpi uY GSNp ..lvv�y +M �aQ L YC �VwY LQ '�pC� O•NFEZ. 4�Ni ro.. of �p nd N000 YNYO. C ■ Y Y� ,p +i M V i.r W 4Y4 i ryye P C C C f 0 N y C dNU N'dW +r Kd Ll 1 r' Ll 1 r' rrrll LLJ ° tl a ` •� M'AC�1 ` L'�M Y 61 a h LZ w� n C Q Z� 6n C yy L O .. YT �.I O �6x KY N L> `� AAA Y� w � L o eJr� WA w� gtitl jt ZOO St. 4 �w N y ..ppu. M e tl C�" pppppp µ� CCa C �i� \�dA rrrll LLJ ° tl a ` •� M'AC�1 ` L'�M Y 61 n C Q Z� R^ r u N = KY N WA St. tl C�" R 3' C �i� LY L tTn 4yO.0 vC yp +u �e r an a§ W� Nge+ CY. LY �..w"a O LtlVC A Oil was M �L�Dya� � ^ (� N. as : N L YS7 t 4 YI L. L °nQV v� I Y r`l '�•z �L } y pY sc X01 N�q^ YM ?@' M Y Ma •n 1-0C L6 CwYQ L S L C Mp nY OO; i L°L O7 ry �V lr ytiviylw iCaa� �t �twl.�I ,•04�j�_ ,�.y � �G W� i aLi �•��l wnCM �� e w e� a '�.i aV ME al 1lf 1G A N Y • K O ' N L N Oti Y'Y Yo it n C Q Z� R^ r u N = KY N WA St. tl C�" kp ANC AY LY F+ f f I I V I ----- �---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �r )i 17T1ss` F IHXPO�tT 77 nw . UAIE: November 25, 1 87 0 TO: Chairman and fibers of the Planning Commfision FROM: Brad Boner, City Planner BY: Debra Mdiier, Associate Planner' i SUBJECT: "!IRON ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMEt fiT 87=W - CIIT UF" RAiiCli0 "OtC7 W- W pproposa amen'd the Wetoria ommun y an to require a Conditional Use Permit for certain community facilities as specified in the Commercial standards; and Community Facilities sections of the Victoria Community Plan. I. BACKGROUND: This amendment is the result of a Ci `Council roquest to Modify-The Victoria Plan to require a Conditional Use Permit for certain community facilities. The primary purpose is to bring the Victoria Plan requirements consistent with that of ,the`Development Code for similar uses, particularly those * uses, that.! 4picaily have a greater impact on existing adjacent uses. - II. ANALYSIS: A. The amendment primarily affects the CommurtitY Facilities section of the Community Plan on Page 241. Minor amendments also occur within the Commercial Standard section, Pages 235 to 234 only to ,gain consistency in regard to the Community Facilities uses. The following amendments, preceding sequentially by page number, are as follows Page 236 (.,,Kbibit W) Clete Item a.(5) Institutional and Goveenmertal Uses. 2. Delete item a.(7) Preschools and Day Care Centers. 3. The remaining items should be re- numbered accordingly. 4. Add Item a.(10) Permitted Community Facilities as listed on page 241. ITEM' P l . t i r { - PLANNING COM, SSf. .' WF- REPORT VCPA 87-03 , City of Rancho Cucamonga November 25, <a1987 Page 2 Page 231 (Exhibit "8 ") 1. Del�� that portion of Item c.(8) Public Parks and Pi ayyr6und. 2. Add Item c.(10) Conditionally Permitted uvwmty Facilities as listed on Page 2141. Page 238 (Exhibit "C ") 1. J?elete Item a.(5) Governmental Uses. 2. The remaining items should be re- numbered accordingly. Page 239 (Exhibit "D ") 1. Add Item a.(12) Permitted Community Facilities as listed on Page 241. 2. Calete Item c.(2) Parks and Playgrounds, Public avid Private. ?f 3. The remaining items should be re- numbered accordingly. 4. Add Item c.(7) Conditionally Permitted Community Facilities as listed on Page 241. Page 241 (Exhibit-.'E') 1. Uses Permitted - The following uses shall be permitted within Residential and Commercial Land Use areas in Victoria. a. Small family Day Care in the home, providing care for six (6) or less persons. b. Public Park and Playground c. General Open Space uses. d. Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above as provided for in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. 2. Conditionally Permitted Uses - The following uses shall be permitted within Residential or Commercial Land Use °+ areas in Victoria subject to the Conditiot,ll Use Permit process.. 0 it VI«PA r+ oitCica�ponga November 2ti, l7 Page 3 r a C -lurch ` b. Club, Lodge, fraternity and sorority c. Convalescent center d. Public facility e. Large family Day Care in the`nome, providi 7 -12 persons. f. Child Care centers g. Fire and police station h. Out0oor recreation i. Schools, private and parochial ,�. Utility or service facility B. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the n ro n ec RIM ano determined that, the modification to require d Conditional Use Permit for" certain community facilities will not have a significant ,impact on the environment. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to consider approval of the modificat ' "Tie"— planning commission must first find that this amendment is consistent with the Victoria Community Plan and the General Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE; This item has been advertised as a public hearing in die uaily Report newspaper. V. RECORIENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider all material and public input regarding this modification. If the Commission concurs with the Facts for Findings, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. 545ry•i i.yygya� $ht$ � Y � �` Y A E�L'Y .Rr 1 itesp 1�1 s tod, )) r� i er nner a 5 Attachments; Exhibit "A" - Paga 236 of the Victoria Comnity Plan Exhibit "B" -Page `237 of the Viaci aria C'atnity, Plan a *^ „Exhibit "C" - Page 238 of the Victoria Copwniby PT an I 'Exhibit *D "' - Page 239 ,if the fiotoria Cowp nity Plan j Exhibit "E" - Page 242 hf the Iictoria CowOity Plan Resolution of Appreva's a i r ,;r F :.,OMMERCIAL STAtNDARDS (continued) - I 2. Regional Center ` . A. The following general ':categories of uses shall be permi tte(�A (l) Retail businesses, including. but not limited to: department stores. 4 . drug stores jewelry stores book stores record stores hi- fidelitit_ersipment sales « clothing stoteo -m , P usical instrumaint' sad'4d— o shae stores ` candy stores photography equ pment .sales (2) Sevice businesses including, "t not limited to: watch`''aad jewelry repair beauty parlors travel aganoies locksmiths' - `Ibanks and financial instituti,lns movie theaters (3) AdminiJtrative a- ;professional offices (4) Cmuercial recreation 4ttt�tisr�a� --ad ee Restaurants rv) Aresebe_� - er • .+.•.. day ..a.a. c wcaa �+ca. a- (OM Nurseries end garden: supply stores, provided that fertilizer or any type 91'a:.l be sold :and stored in Packaged form only. (`LEA) Public utility offices rig }�j Wholesale bvs4 ess offices with samples on the premises, but not to include e� -eral storage -,` (17)(1:1) Accessary structures . -rsd uses rie^essarl; Qr (roa Pert�>ffe ' Cvr *"- Z." X�y ci /-r' s lx�s L- ' e" t 7— RANCHO CUNMONGA w ,e nwf kn tvvrr-ikr ' e Al r '1u79 r�'k ' Y a csui6llmax ily incidental. to the above uses ast . by ties � cucamonga zoning s,4ck qp >erxyu�itted V,Mi.i3Q�1k��' 4 �� t7sea gerrmi.ttc�d subject to specific approva3 02 Conditional care facilbies, nct including, kennels c: t�1 Parking dots r--)d parking buildings. (3) Automob%lr service stations and car gashes (a) Automobile sales and seryit,e 4 (S) ElA%.txx,:i di�-,:ribution`'swritch atat tans (6, Coscmunication equipment buildings �I (7) Ttublid ut'lity booster stations (8} Co=iercial recreation, aadl c.. (9) Accessary structures and uses necessary o customarily incidental to the above uses ass spe•wifical.lg providlid ;far by the use permit and the zoning ordinan(te of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ;_i F COtviMERCIAL S`>'ANCV'AOS (continued) 3 Regiona -I Related Land LTSes a. The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: (1) 'Retail business, including but not limited to: department stores furniture stores automobile sales pet stores motorcycle sales a4d sarvice home improvement center hardware stores grocery stores clothing stares meat markets or deligcatesae!ns (7's' Service business, including tut not limited toe banks, fin�%ncia<,.% institutions aut ©mobile reoair blueprinting and photostati.ng cleaning and pressing business laundries locksaiths mortuaries mechanical, auto wash plumbing supply .- -,movie theaters �hotographia auppl.aes or studios eqctpment rental (3) Administrative and professiodfal offices (4) %ses 5PT Commercial (a Automobile service facilities -7 Nurseries and garden supply stogies, provided that- fertilizer of any type be stored and sold in packaged form only .I '0 Pi, Public util; ty offices I Crry Cr �y .�*t�y^� fl.� Ulh.i�MIXA PLANNPO DV ti a ti t 'ST a SI tels4 7 IT"'r Self' �B VICL launat atsd self- servx,�e dry , �t . r14an41g facilities y: structures and uses n,scessary or cussii.ly incidental to �.�above uses as pertcitted by the Rancho Cucam�cnga zoning Ordinance t /2) Pz°rirrr�rsrrrfy {-�lHi / <i!' cvs, C- Uses permitted s;ub°;ect to a Conditional use Permz�., {3} Animal care 'facilities ~'r ,a 4 r"IM - L L, � r r z 7 a.vurxa� j- g73'e..��^^�'�'a^:d Z 01 Public utility booster stations Parkin lots �3 and Barking buildings 4 Lam' Public utility exchange and substations, a Public buildings Cf Accessory structures and, uses necessary or customarily incidental two the above JI uses as sgecifioally provided for by the use permit i �°�° l { Crry Cr �y .�*t�y^� fl.� Ulh.i�MIXA PLANNPO DV U i COMMUNITY FACILITIES The Community Facilities seofi�!on of the Victoria C,'cammunity Playa is established to provi � for community s,pp®rt user and those additional rases wiAch are found to be compatible with the.,basi ;! permitted uses by the site Plan Review Pdocess ,p t.r.edure. uses Permuted: The following uses shall be permitted within RelAdential and Commercial Land Use "Areas in Victoria subject to Development Approval.Process. a. Genital open space uses b. Schools, churches, and libraries 'c. Public and private recreation facilities d. Establishments for care of children e. Fire stations and other public and quasi - public - facilities F. Accessory struetues and uses neces.- #ary-,or customarily incidental'to the abc:,e as provided for in the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning ordinance ROAD STANDARDS This section contains spAcific criter'ia'for the roads within Victoria. The Standard-Road Section Reference Flan shows the entire planning area and the location of the various kind:a of roads. The Standard Road Cross- Sections follow and they contain information such as the width of the= right -of- way, pavement width, number cf `travel lanes, and the location of walks, bicicle lanes;�ui medians. Each road has been examined individually and the design of the cross- section reflects not only the need for efficient automobile circulation, but also the goals of the plan with respect to land use and uroar__aesign. All road sections are schematic and do not show any grade conditions that may exist where the roads are built. CTITCF A.Atvt M MMM nFm,1lGP. Tnu �xx�a�_ _ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE P.ANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANN14G COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -03 TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CERTAIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES AS SPECIFIED IN THE COMMERCIAL STANDARDS AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES SECTIONS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN. WHEREAS, on the 25th day of Novemher, 1987, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code, SECTION 1: The Rancho Cuca_maonga ?Manning Commission has made the following n ngs: 1. fat the Amendment will provide for development of a t.n:prehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and 2. That the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner: - stent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City; and 3. That the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development with the District. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Plao►kigg Commission has found that this pro ec w not create a significant adverts) impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a .Negative Declaratiotp_.;an November 25, .1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby rLcomrAnds approval of Victoria Planned Community Amendment 87 -03. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Victoria Planned Clwmnity Amendment 87 -03 to modify the Community Plan per Exhibit "A ".- This amendment shall apply to any and all applications for community facilities for whit complete applications were filed :.4th the City pr' tq December 1, 1987. Pao ` PLANNING CWHISSIGN RESOLUTION NO. victoria Community PIvA Amen !Kt 87-03 November 25, 1987 PagP�Z APPROVED AND ADOPTED 'THIS 25TH DAY Q:- --40VEWUR, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Carry T. REN161, Chairman ATTEST: urao su »er, Deputy secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy- of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamongay da hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by,, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meetin�of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of November, 1987, by the followinj vote -to -wit: AYES: COtit+ixSSIONERS: NOES: COWISSIONEPS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: A# ya.. Sv'.:kRr S shoe stor 5j l candy stores photography equipment sales (2) Sovice businesses, including, but not limited to., watch and jewelry'repnir beauty paticrs travel. agencies Locksmiths. banks and financial institutions movie theaters (3) Administrative and professional offices (4) Commercial recreation ;r 5)) l Restaurants ' ;i Preyabseis and aft y care re•- .•_r --- (ate) Nurseries and garden supply store(`, provided that fertilizer of any type shal3,1 be sold and stored in packaged form only. ,// �7 Public utility offices 6,6)L3M Wholosa a business offices with samples on the t,•,� premises, but not to include general storage Accessory stvactur es and uses necessary . or �:.;t. Pert Cornrr�un;�; y li t s /S7e2l'` en , 0 A/��'-RANCM MY OF � f� �c�ax� A COMMERCIAL STANDARDS (continued) H H 2. Regional, Center -a, The following general categories of uses shall be permitted; (l) etair;busirsesses : includingp but not limited " ( department stores drug stores j*welry stores book stores record stores hi- fid*lity equipment sales clothing store'l, . musical in��ent sales Fw f T customarily incidental to the above uses as , permitted by the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning-- ordizance. e. uses permitted ec �: sub °r Conditional- Conditional- Use Permit o speoificpprooal of (1) At -imal care tacilities, not including. kennels (2) Parking lots and parking buildings a (3) Automobile service stations and car washes (4) Aii iasaobile sales and service (5) Ele &,\tzie distr izution switch stations (G) COMMup))c.ati.on tquipmaint buildings (7) Pub�V.i utility booster .stations (8) Comi ,,;%, arecreation, (S) Accessbry strzctures acid uses necessary , =lar customarily inoii ntal to the above uses as��� specifically provided for by the use permit and the toning ordinance o, the City of,,Rancho$'""-,, Cucamonga. Ufl� G�r'ilztl ,rxim' Goerlmc..- ��ri�7►C'� /i��a' ors '�' ?:,�1, Irv' cn-y()F nim ' Leon R IQ CUCA,'t9 MA - `� i ILM 11 COMMEACIALST4NDARDS (continued) 3. Regional Related Land uses .Z- The following general categories of U.T-,,s shall be permitted: husiatss, including but not limited to: department stores furniture stores automol,,U* salon Pat xtb)`tQs Mototcy sales and service home iM4)rovament cantor bardwari'; _rtores grocery stores clothing stores Mott � markets or -delicatessens (2V Service business, including but not limited to.- bar*s, financial institutions aut��obile repair' blueprinting and PhOtostiting Cleaning and Pressing business • laundries lockstiths mortuaries • mechanical auto wash plumbing supply movie theaters • photographic supplies or studios OquiPM*nt rental M- -Administrative end professional offices (4) Restaurants 5 Commercial PT Automobile service facilities W Nurseries and garden ",supply stores, provided that-fertilizer of any tjj* be Stared and sold in packaged form only 9 Of' Public',',-tility offices crff CF AP. RANCHO CUCAM*,rA Tm.E. _ J Rot+els and motels /e (JrII , Self- service laundry and 31034- service dry cleaning facilities c �! Accessoz structures and ulo4m..necessary or ' cus'teimaraly incidental to iKbia� above uses as P*rmitted `by the Rancho CuR,amongA Zoning t' /2)r; rdi lee Jfy' ' Gar:�ra ant:ly Ah ,ar• z$ /• c- UMI permitted subject to a Condiitienalg,vse Permit tl? Animal care facilities .r 2 Ry Public utility booster stations Parking lots and parking buildings F 4. W Public utility exchange and '-substations � 6 W Public buildings Accessory structures and uses necessary or k customarily incidental'to he above uses as specifically provided for :,V the use permit C' 07 C"orrxl/y�►'.�??! G!✓d!f!►?Ltt? t�?G / % /�J'G'S C=MY � 3 ANbOW— htvx9rw GQMMUNMY F-ACU M r The Community Facilities section of the Victoria P Mtmity Plan is established to provide for community, !suPpo�--t uses. c and those additional uses which are found two be compatible. with the basic Permitted uses by the Site Plan Review - Process Proceauxt. k 1. Uses Permitted - The following urns shall be permitted within Residential and Commercial Land Use areas in Vi ctori a:. a. Small family Day Care in the homer providing care for six (6) or less persons. b. public park and Playground c. General Open Space uses. d. Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to hj� above as provided for in the RanOhr,Cucamonga DeY2lopment Code. = 2. Conditionally Permitted Uses �Ttt$`cllowing uses shall be'permitted within Residential or Commercial Land Use _ areas in Victoria subject to the Conditional Use Permit <, p,- ocess: a. Church b. Club, ;odne, fraterniid< and sorority c. Convalescent center d. Public facility e. Large family Day Care in the home, providing care for 7 -12 persons. f. Child Care centers g. sire and police station h. Outdoor recreation I. Schools, private and parochial _ <1 J. Utility or service facility _ MY ttTbb %=°,' tf lfi7l ill _ 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA / STAFF REPORT DATE: November 25, 1987 10: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUW ECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN I*-vUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENMENT 87- - GITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amen en to prov a proce ures or requesA.i. ^.g cmo ication of rai' service "development standards and to authorize "mediu:s wholesale storage and distribution" as a permitted use in Subarea 13 bounded by the I -15 Freaway on the east, Buffalo Avenue on the west, approximately 280' south of 8th Street on the north end ao.proximetely 1,335' north of 4th Street on the south, I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to consider-the environmental assessment and approval of revision +s to the Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISP). This report summarizes the rev,'sions which are proposed and recommends their approval. II. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSFION: In September of 1986 the City Council a op a ex etis v`� a amendments to the Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISP) as recommende6 by the Planning Commission. As developers and staff have worked over a year with the new p'.an additional fine tuning has been suggested. This report identifies and provides recommended modification to two items of concern. Firstly, it has been noted that the "medium wholesale storage and distribution" uses are authorized as permitted uses in all General Industrial Districts except one, Subarea 13. This subarea is located between the I -15 Freeway and Buffalo /6th Street and just north and south of 7th Street. Recent staff review of the subarea did not provide reasons for the deletion of this use in Subarea 13 and we therefore recommend its addition as a permitted use. It should also be notes that this matter first came to our attention through an inquiry by a developer. The second issue relates to the rail service standards. The current standards mandate rail service development of all properties adjacent to planned or existing lead and spur lines. This requireoent was adopted to ensure that these properties which have the greatest rail - service potential are not lost to that use by development which dolts not make accommcodations for the rail service potential. ITEM Q I; it ,'` •Li ; PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT .,yx„ §§ ISPA 87 -02 - -=A.ty of Rancho Cucamonga;4 November 25, 1487 Page 2 - Staff strongly supports this Policy P P Y but as a result of developer concerns it wAt noted that there is no avenue to request relief from the standards.. Therefore staff has drafted a procedure by . which property owners and deve"1;1)!;ers can request modification to I V.'e standards. The new provisions would require review by the Planning Commission and mandatory find,iigs for approval which are designed to allows for deviation from the standards in hardship �. situations only. The following new secti wt would be added to the -. ISP, Part III as Section G.6 ;, "The above re #erenLad rail servic.,development standards may be amended or deleted on a site kv -sjte basis during Development /Design Review - process. mt following must tie determined by itne Planning Commission in ar "oer =cu a .horize any modification of the ra- !V,';ervice standards: _ a. That installation of a lead or spur track cannot be accomplished due to physical constraints on or'adjaent to 'and the project site; b. Other existipg or potential rail service properties will not be negaticvely affected in heir ability to accommodate rail service' activity as a result of mpdificatiCas to the standards." III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has ,rWeted Parts I and II of e nv ronmerita eWi,t and concluded the proposed amendments would not create significant adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, staff recommends issuance )f a Negative De,'- ,I,ration. _ IV. CWIRESPOWp NCE: This item has been advertised as a public nearing in e a y _eport newspaper. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopted -Tne--a-attached Resolution recommending approval of the proposed amendment and issuance of a Negative Decla Ition to the City Council. R ctfu u rt£ed, City fanner BR :AW :vc Attachments: Draft Resolutiion of Approval �� ,5 � x� A ��d- �1, Ste^- '�`r v :f ._ ,°•;� a s *7 "ac a,- .,,,y'w �si*7aF �C `RESOLUTION NO. A RESOL tiTTION OF THE` &L*9 Z-OWISSION OF Y'HE ZTTY OF � RANCHO Cfl C A?t tlliAL OF TFDUS'T'R , AREA SPECIi IC OM �HT k}2 , ED%#!G SECTION a. 6 TO PART HOMMG S Iii ANq �GI yT,4 1i �9 E ANO ,w DISTRI -ailro i4' PRIfTED? ,IISi x BART Y, SUH'1 13, .OF THE ND1fSTilalAr AR i+A SPeixPI :PLt4H. WHEREAS, on the Mh day of November, 1987 the Planning' Cond'ssior held a duly advertised, p ift hearing pursuant to Section 6ft-54 of the California Government oade, and WHEREAS, the: Ptanhing Comission finds it nec*ssary to clarify =and revise the Industrial ,Area Sp i`ic Plan regulations pertaining, to rail rai service standards and "dlum warehousing storagd and distribution,,, /? ses. SECTION I. The;,Rancho Cucamonga Planning Co fission ( 's made the fallowing " 1. That the \atameadment is warranted to permit an appeal process to the rail serve Development Standards and ,authorize. "medium warehouse storage and distributiQn� uses in ubarea 13 of the industrial Area SpLr3fic Plan; and �. 2. That the proposed ISP aimendme►' would not have significant impact on ,the envirioment; and 3. That the proposed ISP mendment is in conformance with the goals and policies of the Gei,erai plan. SECTION 2: Ttse Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has fou,4 that this pro ec w not create a significant adverse; Impact on.`tt environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on November e.., =2987. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved: I. fie pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of ttie California Goverment Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho C'ucsmonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day.of November, .1987 Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 87 -02 amendirg part III, Section G.6 and Part' IV, Subarea 13 as follows A. part III, Section G.6 shall be added to read as follows: "The above referenced rail service development standards ma)i r be amended or deleted on :a site -by -bite basis durinr the Development /Design Review process. The foilaring must be determined by the Planning Commission in order to authorize any modification of the "rail rtervice standard: gS""`�.:. • f _ Ci in e� yX I � F ta) That ) �#0'41ion of a leaA. or, a 60 b .�� a�3p ,pand'I 1 con tra s o7r car adj.a0gri x !J f) Ot er elf ng r P"o1renti,al rail 'servi�e: peop�ri~i no n gat�ve Of tod iii their ability � aaec `rail s0 aotivfty, as _ rest of y Sri`sto t6ea^ds'' Ba Pert ° S ^ba i rshall" tided 1-0 include "Medium whoaesa7� 5brage drat' bnder arstittstit u'se's, ' Stn Planriq�issi,rV eb rpcads thst the Cit Council approve ood by aevet� t "istridt A is3a nx "87 -02.y 3. That a cert)fied copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopt�'6y the Planning the City Co #1, Commission shaE�i,.be forwarded to ec APr^ROYEf)�- *D ADOP TED THIS 25TH DAY OF `76VEMLR, 1,987. i PLANPIN& COWISSION-0- THE CITY DP RANCHO CUCAMONGA A r; BY: arry , c e s a r ATTEST: ra Buller, epu y ecre ary I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of .he - Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby,',certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly avid regularly introduced, passid, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1t a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of November, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: C'OKIISSIONERS: _ NOES: COWISSIONERS: ABSENT: COWISSIOMFRS: s �I W 4°1} RE DATE i Noveer 2 1987 le ?i TO; Chaituan..an8'RembeYrs of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Pla6ner BYs Chris Westm4n .Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENik ONM 1 L, A55ESSl X11° AND DEYBLQPME -NT BI.STRiCT A requ �, o amen opa�en s ,�° p ' roia Lorr Den�i#: Revidertt i 4 dwelling dmt �,,ptrY Acr0) and 'Medium-High Densi*y Residential (1.4 -24 dwetIfn.g units per acre) to Inousil Specific Plan, General In:u.riat, Subarea 1, far 4.31 acres of ]ands located north of, b`Ch Street, east of Grove Avenue and West of Baker Avenue - h 207 - 541180 and 207 - 251-12, v_. ---W +- �tRd9AAift%TA '- wit FGq[9E� &L Y.o arzen e n us rl;a R ' c 8n d expAnd Subarea 1 to include 4.31 acres of 1-and generally located east of Grove Avenue, north of 8tN Street-and west of Baker Avenue - APN 2070541 -50 and 207- 251 -12. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Location: North side of 8th Street, between Grove axd Baker. j' B. Site Area: 4.31 acres (gross) total. Parcel A =`2,00 ecres Parcel B = 2.31 acres C EiQ. a x s ing ton ng. Parcel A - Medium -Nigh Residential (MH, 14 -24 dwelling units per acre) Parcel B - Low Residential (L, 2-4 dwelling !inits per acre) D. Existing Land Use; Both parcels are currently vacant. i ITEMS R,S Y � 1 PLANNING .��"� DOR 8 =10 Oi g ,�AM0WA TSPA 8-03 - 1T' 0 . _' C!)CA TONGA November 25, 198.7 Page 2 A. Surrounding and Use and Zoning. t:or ='� �s . ng 'fir anon s and Single Family Homes, Medi um- HiTgh Nesidrntfat (14-24 dwelling unfits per acre) and Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units pvr acre) South - Single Family Residential; R -1 WAaM o.) 0,-'a st - Vacant; Itrdlriai Specific Plan Subarea 1 West Vacant; M -2 (Ontario) F. General Plznnations: Project S e - errera"T n- clustriai North - Medium -Nigh and Low Rer`i;�n ial South R -1 (Ontario) East - General Industrial West M -r (Ontario) G. Side Characteristics :. The subject site is vacant with no vege on. erdis a 2 -3 foot gr.. de separat°tbn between the site and 8th Street. A railroad mainline runs along the north property boundary east and west. There are existing apartments and single family residences on properties adjacent to the north as well as on the south side of 8th Street. Properties east and pest are undeveloped. II. ANALYSIS: A. Site Develo ability: The possibility of developing either parcell un er the existing zoning districts, is limited. Imposing residential development standards (i. �'' setbacks and requiring additianal dedication for 8th Streetl_ improvements) ould only allow an approximate 15 foot area for home 6nstruction under the "Low" designation and the "MH" designation. Refer.to the table below: Parch; A Parcel 6 Averagt lot depth 75 ft. i5 ft. AddiV Oc)al street dedication -14 ft. -14 ft. ParkiP4 adjustment +12 ft. +12 ft. Front yard setback -45 ft. -37 ft. Rear yard setback -15 ft. -20 ft. w` Buildable area 4 13 16 N a PLANNING COM ISOON f iAPP REPORT 1 DDA V -10 - CM Or - 9-RNCCiO• CUCAMONGA ISPA 8703 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGa <: November 25, 1987 Page "3 iB, Surrounding Land Use: The propeyly ,tt� the north is developed w� p apa�r n s and sfr,(e �It- Tly=�,homes. However, separating the subject properties and these dk`M ooments is: the Atchison Topeka and Sant4,�Fi 4afj,eoad main 11q's. this physical barrier would hinder any attempt to connect the Northerly residential projocts to any project, on these two } properties. The properties to the south, across 8th Street, are developed with single family homes which "back on" t6 8th Street with a six foot block wall running adjacent: to the sidewalk the entire leigth of 8th avenue. This type of site design does not entourage interaction between the two sites north rand south of 8th Street. The properties east and west" are vacant, and are zoned for industrial use. Eight industrial buildings were approved for the easterly site by the Planning Commission in May, 1987. Therefore, V- cause of the existing built physical characterist" of the surrounding properties, any residential project Yuil on Parcel "A" or "B" will be an "island". �i General Plan An interpretation has been made by staff regar ng a ;enerat -Plan designation of both parcels. Although it is nit specifically detailed on the land use map as General Industr €al District, a logical progression care be continued for all properties south of the railroad tracks to the western "boundary of the City. Therefore, the proposed Development District Amendment and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment would bring the zoning into conformance with the General Plan, Lot Size B0#1 parcels conform to tha minimum lot size requirement for the General Industrial Distrit't. Half -acre sites are required and both parcels are 2 acres or greater. Although 1" minimum lot depth is not specified within the- Industrial Specific Plan, a mrinimum parcel width of 200 feet is required, Both parcels have approximately 1,250 linear feet of 8th Street frontage. Rail Service Should the Development District change be recommended y the Planning Commission, rail service would be required under the general ,:provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. However, becav a of the easements which would be required for spur lines and runaround tracks, it would be virtually impossible to develop these properties with buildings that would accommodate rail service. The project which is approved on the east side of,;Baker and similar projects which are already constructed farther east on 8th Street do not provide for rail service specifically for this reason. F: PLANNING MISSION STAFF REPORT ODA 87-10 - CITY OF RRNCK CUCAMONGA ISPA 87 -o3 - crry ,oP RAFI o cocAmomraA NoveRber 25, Page 4 III. ENVIRONMEiTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Initial Study awn 'revl4iwe a nv ronmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study an6 has found ho' significant ad� rsg environmental impacts to occur a f a result of the proposed arMdment and district charges. It is 'anticipated that any issue of vehicular impacts may be successfully mitigated at the project level. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission upon examination of the 5evelopmenT District Amendment'` and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment decide that changes would promote the land use goals and purposes of the General Alan, it would not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts as listed under the Environmental Assessment-, the following findings are necessary for approvalsi A. The amendments do not conflict with the land ma policles of the General Plan; and B. The amendments do promote the goals of the land Use Elements; and. C. The amendments would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in e a y e ort newspaper, the property pasted', and notices sent to al I properV owners within 300 feet of the pr«&ct'site. V1. RECOMMENDATIN: Staff recommends that the Medium -High Residential parcel ana Cow esidential parcel be changed to Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 1, and that the Industrial Specific Plan be modified to reflect the addition of these two parcels within Subarea 1. If the Commission concurs with this recommendation, adoption of the attached Resolutions -. recommending approval to the City Council of " the Development District Amendment and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment and Issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. CaRes- ull ed, nner BB: CW:te Attachments; Exhibit "A" - Location. Map 3. Exhibit "B" -- Parcel Identification Exhibit "C" - Land Use and Zoning Exhibit "D" - Western ISP Boundary Resolutions of Approval E ] CITY OF ITEM- +ff�A RANCHO CUCAN"CA Trnr,, PLANNM DRqSK)N EYHiBrr.- SCALD tI i ♦If * 11 h • D � � �®.c dy `,a On tl e11 M d 6„ ' d . i 1F Y' IIIF~ ' ♦ � I X X 7 +� • sj _ _ G CITY OF 1TEXEm. _VPAA7' IN7A 0715 RANCM Ct INK A. TrrLE: .. p -nfrfCAT7r-%" PLANKING I?'fl'rEQi°v' EXHIB! P _ _ SCALER ,5-40 A y. �� � a ��..:�� Asa ': :, i ��' ' , :, l *. �� yt' °. is RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE NO.. 87 -10, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATIVN FROM MEDIUM -HIGH AND LOW RESIDENTIAL TO INDUST111AL SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STREET EAST OF -GROVt AVENUE AND WEST OF BAKER AVENUE = AN 20- 541 -b0 AND 207451-12 A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has 'filed an application for Development District Change No. 87-10 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Change request is referred tows "the application ". (ii) On November 25, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFOgE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Franniny Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution -are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this C vmmission during the above- referer.,sed public hearing on November 25, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located north of 8th Street and west of Baker Avenue with a street fronta!le of approximately 2,500 feet and lot dep.h of approximately 80 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The adjacent property to the norith of the subject site is a railroad line, the property to the south of that site consists of single family homes, the properties to the east and west are vacant. (c) The property's dimensions are in compliance with the lot size requirements of the Industrial Specific Plan; and (d)` Setbacks from property lines for residential districts render the property undevelopable; and PLANNING COMMI=ON R r rON N0. ODA 87 -10 - CITY OF RA HO CUCA%NGA November 25, 1987 Page 2 N d (e) __ The properties are suitable for general industrial development giwk the physical characteristics of the property and adjoining land uses; and (f) The property is not in conformance with its reciprocal general plan designation. 3. Based upon the substantial- evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and gron the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) :mat the subject property is suitable for the -ises permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existin, land use in the surrounding area; and i (b) That the proposed district charge would have Significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and (G) That the propose6 -. district change is in eonfnrmance with the -b"enerai Plan. I 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has.,, been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Ervirormental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Dec - laration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: (a) That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of `the _ California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of November, 1587, Industrial specific "Flan Amendment No. 87 -03. (b) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Development District Amendment "o. 87 -03. (c) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and reiated material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall qoo ` fy to the adoption of this Resolution. C i^ PLANKNO .iil+R'�. r °. ° DDA 87 -its OF NGA November 87 i Page 3 ' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1987. Pi.Al117ING COMM I fC OF RANCHO CUCAMMA arry T. WWI, a ATTEST: ra Isu I UP, Depal sWitify I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of, the Planning Commission of the City rc Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of November, 1987, by tk�following rrote -to -wit: AYES: 'COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: - ABSENT: COM41SSIONERS: 4 RESOLU';r'ON NO. A RESOLUTIO14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING '-INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMfADMENT 87 -03, REQUESTING API APDITION TO SUBMEA ONE LOCATED NORTH , OF 8TH STREET EAST OF SRO' " -'= AVENUE AND WEST OF BAJCEP- -VENUE - APN 207- 541 -60 AND 207- 251 -12 A. Recitals. I (i) The City of Rancho Gucamonga has filed an application for ' Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No. 87.03 as Oescribed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter Vin. this - Resolution, the subject Industrial Specific Plan Amendment request is`.,=aferred to as "tb applicationu. (ii) On Nov" 25, 1587, the Planning Commission of 'the City of Rancho,Cucamonva conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the Ooption,,or this Pesolution have occurred. B. ` Restitution. x NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the P',;anning Gommissian of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ac follows: i, Ms Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part,,A, of this P.estnlution are true and cop +rect. 2. kissed upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission .during the above- referenced public hearing on November 25, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimeny, this rc-wmission hereby specifically finds as follows: Via) The application applies to property located north of Sufi Street and west of Baker Avenue wit a street frontage of approximately 2,500 feet and lot death of approximiatdjr 80 feet and is presently vacant,,and (b) The adjacent property to the not,th of the subject site is a railroad line, the property to the south of that site consf- is of single family homes, the properties to the east-and wE3t are vacant. (c) The property's dimensions -ire in compliance with the lot size requirements of the Industrial Specific Plan; and (d) Setbacks from property lines for residential districts render the property undevelopable; and f i r PtANNIWG COWISSO i EWq_ IDN NO, „' ISPA 87 -03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKNGA November 25, 1987, Page 2 (e) ji7he properties are suitable for general industrial development given gh4!physical characteristics of the property and adjoini.ig land uses; and Y t •) (he- property is not in conforw tpce with its reciprocal general plan designation, 3. Based upon the substrntial evidence presented ;to this Commission during the above= referenced public hearing and upon the spfi�Jfic findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission "hereby finds and concludes as follows._, (�+) That th (k, 'subject property is, suitable for the uses permitted in the -proposed district vh terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and (b) That the proposed district change, would haver- sig0ficant impact on the envivonment nur t5d" surrounding properties, Ind` (c) That the proposed district change is in conformance with; -the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby fiinds,464 certifies that the ,project has been reviewed and considerej in compliance-kith the California Environmsntal Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this,. Commis; on hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set`forth''ir noragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: (a) That pursu&Iit to O,ectia►,;, 85850 to 55855 of the California Govr:r/rYant Coyle, that . the Planning Commission of ttye City of Rancho Cup,,aiodroa hereby recommends approval on the 25th day,! of November, 1987, Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No. 87 -03. (b) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that ,e City Council approve and adept Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No. 87 -03. (ca That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related t i ma era hereby adopted by the Planning Commissim shall b•: forwarded to the City Council. S. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall ces°i y to ;46ption of this Resolution. x� �s t s . KANOM. COM TS6,2041RM� 1%ON W to ISPA 87.08 - CITX"OF d3AN 'CDCAMONGA November 2,5, ,l.98; Page 3 �1 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, x987,_, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 4'TY OF RANCHO CUCAMCN6tl B: airy r. MERIFIT, Cn tftn ATTEST: Prad 651 er, Deputy secretary I, Brad Busier, Deputy Secretary of the Plannfng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fore0oing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passedy and adopted by -�*4 Planning Commission of the City-of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetingl'ut the :Manning Commission held on the 25th day of November, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: A'C'ES: Ct?Mb1ISSIONtRS: ` NOES: COMMISSIONEVS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �s t ' ' ^ ^ ^ ' November 25, 1987 1977 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner ^ Scott Murphy, Associate Plannar ^ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS�'�JT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 137,28 I single family lots on 20.9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential Dis4rict (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of Nillside Road and Sapphire Street - APN 1061-121-01, 02, and. 03. Associated with this development is Tree Removal Permit 87-81 requesting the removal of 5,',nature treel. 1. ^ A. of subdivIwion map, conceptual sitn and Tree Removal Permit and issuance of a . Negative Declaration. ' � D. 1.68 dwelling mhtm per acre. C. S�errounding Land Use and Zoning: N-0-rfff----'STngie FA -Fy-R-e-sTTe-nT1*al; Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) , South - Single Family Rcsiuentiml; Very Low Residential District (less than 2dwellinW units per acre) ' East - Single Family Residential; Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) West Single Family Residential; Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwa 1inQ units per acre) ' D. ' pruoecn mr District (less than 2 4'�,velling units per acre) North - Very LOW Residential Diutricil (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) .� South - Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Residential District (less than 8 dwelling units per acre) Np;;t - Vary Low Residential District (less than 2-,dwelling units per acre) ITEM T � '�� PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13728 - `NORDIC November 25, 1987 Page 2 ,s E. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant with an average slope o percent frJn north to south. There dre existing single family homes abutting the to the ' project north and to the west. There are existing single family homes on the south side of Hillside and the east side of Sapphire. There are two Eucalyptus trees and two clusters of Juniper trees, each containing four trees, within the project boundaries. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 34 lots ranging in size from 20,050 feet square to 38,300 square, feet%l'in aea. The average lot size within the tract will be 22/;589 squarC'Jeet in area. Surrey Lane will be extended into; the site �; ;•om the west and be completed with a cul -de -sac. A second public street will extend north into- the site from Hillside Road terminating in two cul- de- sacs,. The applicant proposes four floor plans ranging in size from 2,200 square feet to 2,700 square feet in two,,.me -story plans and two ,*wo- story plans, each with three elevations. One of the two -%fory plans, Plan 2700, is dgsigned as a split level stepping rou ;1y 6 feet from front to b( k. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Emerit'k, Tols oy, oTeman'T- orfg-nally reviewed the proposal on Octoa?r 8, 1987. The subdivision design reviewed by the Committee consisted of Surrey Lane e);tending east for almost tha entire lenath of the property nd intersecting with the street -�ilorth extending frliv Hillside Road at a "T" intersection. Also, units were proposed to front onto Hillside Road and Sapphire Street. Community Equestrian Trails were proposed alorng'Hiliside Road and Sapphire Street. After reviewing the proposal, the Committee made the following recommendations: 1. The tract should be redesigned to eliminate the front loading of lots onto Sapphire Street because of traffic confricts. 2. Alternative designs should be explored to minimize the number of breaks in the Community Trail fencing along Hillside Road created by the lots being front loaded. Also, solutions may include the use of shared driveways or relc ,iting the trail to the rear of the lots. Both; issues should to reviewed by the Trails Advisory CommAttee. After reviewing the various alternatives with the Trails Advisory Committee, the applicant submitted the present subd'vision design for consideration. On October 22, 1987, the Design Review Committee reviewed the proposal and recommended approval. _- if '°�'_.• � j �` \ ., PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13728 -- NORDIC November 25, 1987 Page 3 Affft Staff also recommends that decorative block wails be required along Sapphire Street and all corner side yards consistent with Planning Commission policy. C. Trails Advisory Committee; 'ihe- Committee reF ad the project or October 15, 1987, and recomended approva), The prWssed trail improvements included a Community Trail along ,Sapphire Street, a Community Trail located to the rear of the dots fronting on Hillside Road and along the west side of Lot 7, a local equestrian trail running north and south extending from the Community Trail to th- north tract boundary aio ;,g Lots 3, 4, 5, 15, 15, and 17, and' an additional 5 foot trait easement located along the entire north tract boundary in addition to the existing 15 foot easement. The Trails Committee also required that the trail crossing on Street "A° be c '^tructed with a roughened concrete and that adequate trail &___age be provided. ; D. Tree Removal Permit: Associated with the development of the tract, the app car. has submitted a tree removal permit requesting the removal of 5 trees located within the project boundaries. The Eucalyptus tree and the cluster of four Juniper trees located on Lot 12 will have to be removed in order to construct the single family residence and the related improvements. The Eucalyptus tree on Lot 9 and the cluster of four Juniper trees on Lot 11 will be retained as part of the subdivision, The Tree Preservation Ordinance requires replacement with the largest nursery grown trees available as determined by the City Planner or the Planning Commission. E. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Environmental cec s and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a resu.Tt of the project. If the Planning Commission concurs with /;these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be ` appropriate if the Tentative Tract Map is approved. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General an an a eve opment Code. The project, with the addad mitigation measures, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, toge +her with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance With the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. CGRRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a public hearing, notices sent to all property- ers y within 303 feet of the project site, and the site was posted. w RT PLANil K 0, w-;,w �t 0 November 26V 1,987 Page 4 RECWMEN Staff- remMmends "at the Plannia ission apprwe "e e Tract Map 13728 tbrWgh adoption of,�Oe attache Resolution with Conditions,, Tree Removal. Permit 87-81j and issue a ",,Negative Declaration. /,Re4s,1 ly itted, u e Bra 1 IV City lanner 88:SM:te Attachments: Exhibit "P - Site Utilizatid.1 Map Exhibit W - Subdivision Map Exhibit "CO - Site/Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - building Elevations Exhibit "E" - 'Tree Removal Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions CITY (T I`��� ITEM. 4 �� � TITLE: _ Y� 7fLlZd�"fn�f f PLANNING DIN LSK7h EXMIRT - _ SUAIL II 1- 5 fi�c` "Ir 19 Mi Oi jS- m CITIr ()f R. CI O CUC-k ITENI: 'N'O'NGA TITLF: PLA-NNI.NG Dj\,L�K SCALE 77,14 ----------- 4 �Y; iii 1 I — ' Zi, IE .4 is ITEM: TITLE: EXHINT: SC ALE M, ly I_. .19 Vl L 17— k CITY OF RA HO CUC_� Njo\ , ,X-,A PLANNING DIX,LSM .4 is ITEM: TITLE: EXHINT: SC ALE M, ly I_. .19 r � n cq r e� ,4 P. • t t i .TA .�N K% i1F.li-k TITLE • �" rrf►��' PLANNING ill,* EXHIPJT- -A7/— SC: A1 US jsqr ii 3i I -,—T V , A zt44; *1,1� 1 CITY OF ORA:NUHO TM.E1 PI ANNING DIX'M()N T-9 771 _717 El ---� I 4 •� �� at i ra,, f ` W r z E3 a R �I — C'ITY OF rrE. l: i '.�`_,_Z a�` ING J,)[N'ISM ; EXHIWT.`.., ?aC ALE t �. Pt FRONT lkt"ATION hb, &I REAR Et"AT ION CM-()F WA:�CHO PLANNINU rA LI-V-,V EXH114T: -04F ALL SG Ttl 2840 B LE LEFT ELEV TiOIf LLD AIG T ELEVATION I II I _ I ' f CITY OF RANCHO C R � FA ilBiT-. SC ALL F T Y/ �1 FRONT ELEVATION N.N,,...,• .. •VfILVe 1v READ ELEVATj" CITY OF ITE.lC: � .+�•��. PLANNNINC, pjIS ; E H[ lMT: S( �C (� !z: it � n G` 11 2 - o C -' ITEM= RANCED CUC-k 'NK) ~chi YMI! fit ► PLANNING DIN'U)N EXHIPT`' =_+ ,_ SUkLE 1 %i i `�MA4 I rr�� a 7F +--�J. K {! "M11777 y � s LU ;' { CITYOF LrJ W 1 J l A 1 y ^� J 1. W � g f � 17T CITY OF k RANCHO CLCA N TtTi.E = _��' 1 PL A 4 NiVG 'ia EXHIKT:.- ' S aLL Li 1. 1 y ^� J 1. W � g f � 17T CITY OF k RANCHO CLCA N TtTi.E = _��' 1 PL A 4 NiVG 'ia EXHIKT:.- ' S aLL Li r� r W y 1{ S =W !• d _ fl W W LJ Li U FEI CITY T ITEM, Ho CLL-k.N N-G'Ql. TITI.Es FLANN!.V4- T IVISK V EXHMAT- ,04: SCAL. f 0 2700 -A \ j FRONT ELEVATION IT' -� r Lam. RI04Y ME ELEVATION !,j oF RANCHO CUCtk- ti. 3' PLANNING 1' f0iv PAH114T. SCALL _ „� Q , 2700 -A j REAR ELEVATIW1 'r LEFT E40E ELEVATION CITY i�X i TITLE- ?!.A"`N[.. DIN'ISM, E.h FitlilT 4= �L. FRONT 9LEVATION IwcueT �, �l(Ililll (:ITS' OF RANCHO CLICALM PLANNING Li'LRi Bt S 3 Ltr �1=XHt T T � zz- r \r FRONT 9LEVATION IwcueT �, �l(Ililll (:ITS' OF RANCHO CLICALM PLANNING Li'LRi Bt S 3 Ltr �1=XHt T T � zz- 270" REAR ELEVA'nON 6 IL LEFT WE ELEVATM CITY OF s IOMA g PLANNING D(Y79U� srx ar t-r. S( —RILL • pit d r l f J a i 1\ a Ll All , J 7t CITY CF � ffi! �Z 5 !+i i r n i ,. � •r,.�� �:.. �' y\ � �+r � /' ' i *' I { { YTS �� :�tj�j�� f r � !j1 �f' -ice. ��it •. l ��•. � i I CT 0701. -02, 0 11-25 -87 PC Agendi 0 z z Cz J CL z LL( 2. 0 i.1J LU z M G U LL. O z Uj L H Ci CL Uj 0 City of free Removal Permit Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT rOrdinance No. 276, pertaining to the preservation of trees on priva4e property. requires that no person e or relocate any woody plants in excess of fifteen (15) feet In height and having a single trunk ference of fifteen (15) k.ches or more and multi - trunks having a circumference of thirty (ail) or more (measured twenty -four (24) Inchns from ground level), without first obtaining a Tree val Permit from the City. LOCATION OF SUBJECT SITE: northiggat earner of Hillside k Senghire NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF APPLICANT: C P Lana Eftinem 840-K West 9th Street, Upland, CA 91786 (714) 946 -9919 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PROPERTY OWNER (if other than applicant): Nordic Development Company 280 North Berg. un, Suite 6, Upland, CA 91786 (714) X146 -3909 REASONS FOR REMOVAL (attach necessary sheets,,: _ Development of single-family homes ^„ PROPOSED METHOD APPLICANTS SIGNATURE: This application shall Includal plot plan indicating location of all trees to be removed and retained. The spec'ses, number, and size of the trees to be removed shall be so designated. If a tree is diseased, then a written statement from a licensed arborist stating the nature of the disease shall he required. ❑ APPROVED By: DENIED Reasons: Date: Notification of application shall be given to propert owners within a three hundred foot r, #ius ten days prior to approval. If no appeals are receivF-J, then the permit shall become effective ten (10) Jays fro Me date of action. Tnis approved tree removal permit is valid for 90 days from the date of final map recorcn or building permit issuance, whichever comes first. Should applicant fail to remove the trees within this 90 day period, a new permit shall be required, unless an extension Is requested fourten (14) days prior to the expiration of the permit. `%: = --7(11 ` RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF f,t PLANNING COMMiSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT Re NO, 13728, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND DESIGN FEVI 'W 4� 34,,SINGLE li FAMILY LOTS ON'- 20.2 ACRES OF LAK) IN TW AY LOW KCSIDENT;.AL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWrS' a`�, 0ER OF HILLSIDE;ROAD AND SAPPHIRE STREET - APR 1061 - 121 -01, 02, AND 03 A. Recitals. (i) Nordic Development has filed, an application for the approval of Tentative, Tract Map No. 13728 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map req.Test is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 26th of November, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancht, Cucamon;; conducted a duly noticed irrrblis hearing an the application ani c'included said hearing on thIt date. (iii) A17 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, NOW, THrREFORE, iris hereby found, determined rnd resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This', Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fa4tS set forth in the RL- citals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based up-an substantial evidence presented to this Commissial during the above- referenced public hearing on November 26, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of Hillside Road and Sapphire Street wit'.1 a street frontage of 1,318 feet along Hillside Road and 664 feet along Sarpoire Street and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is designated for residential uses and is developed with single family horses; and (c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and il (d) Tlie proposal is in compliance with the Master, plan of Trails and the objectives of the Equestrian Overlay District;, and PLANNING 4C' MI SSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13728 - NORDIC DEVELOPMENT November 25, 1957 Page 2 J� (e) The development of 34 single family loins on 20.2 acres land is consistent with the;; ery Low Residential land use designation of the General Plan. 3< Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings- of facts set forth in paragraphs 1'and ?above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. :. (a) Than tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the( division is not likely to cause substantial`�invironmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and .wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not V kely to cause serious public health proV ems•, and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any Easement acquired by the public at large, now of recorr;, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that Ve project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1973 and, further, this Commission hereby ,',sues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division (1) A decorative_ block wall shall be constructed along Sapph;-re Street and on all corner side yards. • The design and location of the walls shall be shown on the landscape puns which shall be reviewed and approved by the_; yity Planner prior to the issuance of b�fftding permits. is NO. PLANNING COMMI$stiaN LuT7wOx TENTATIVE TRAM 13728 NQRDtC DEVELOPMENT November 25, 1987 Page 3 r, (2) The tries on Lot 12 to be removed shall be replaced with the largest nursery grown trees available as determined by the City Planner. The size and location of the trees shall be indicated''-on the final landscape pia l which shall" be reviewed and approved by the City Planner, (( V 4 (3) The1) C oamunity frail crossing on Street "A" shall be constructed with a roughened concrete fin,ih to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City Cngine.er. (4) Adequate signage shall be provided to identify Comity Trati,crossings. The signs shall be posted at the dleossing location and in advance ,,of the crossing to warn approaching vehicles. Engineerl.' :j Division (1) An f--lieu fee at contributioi,( to the future undergr ,7unding of the exiting overhead utilities (telecommunication an(lrlectr; cal) an the opposite side of Sapphire Areet shall be paid to tte City pric, to approval of the final map. Tile fee small be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Hillside Road to the north project boundary (t 682 feet). (2) Construct the portion of the City Master Plan Sturm Drain No. ?_R ;fin Hillside Rod, Extend temporary storq!, drainage facilities from the - int „ersection or Hillside Road with Sapphire Street to daylight on the west ,side of Sapphire Street south of Hillside as�approved by t'�e City Engineer,. Standard drainage fees for the site shell be credited to the cost of toe facility and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of the fees in accordance with City Ordinance No. 75, (3) Aa justified by a final drainage study approved by the City Engineer, construct a portion of the City Master Plan Storm Drain No. 1 -H on Sapphire Street north of Demens Channel, If standard drainage fees for the site credited to construction of the Hillside Road segment exceed those construction costs, the excess credit shall be applied to the cost of this facility and the developer -shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in accordance with Cil, Ordinance No. 75.E TENTATIVE W7 C ELOPPEIA November 2S, X87' Page 4 (W-Drainage frock lots backing, onto SaDRhire Street tlya,11 be contained in a fire ftet wide dra nage setev t and c6oveo -4 southward on the West side yf tNe C&nity Ta•iT.r9 will only . l allowed tit cross the Dommanil Trail were drlvewttYsrr onto Sagphikre,are lifi lied far feast-wt trails, or as ot-Ka ise a;)Oroved by CIV Engineer. Where trails drain to public streets, conform to City Standard No. 61:3. (5) Improvement plans pared by -a U91stered � Civil Engineer and.' approved by the City Enginer shall be required for the inWjar C m afiy Equestrian Trail. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Cowission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. F APPROVED AND ADOPTED`:,VIS 25TH DAY Of NOWENBER, 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RA4iCHO CUCAK311 Jj BY: r Larry e , a rman p F ATTEST: ra a er, Teputy-S-e-LYietary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuccmonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passef, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of November, 1967, by the following vote -to -wit: DYES: COIMlMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: (I, Tao y y d NYfiYd�U °YY i.� p1C aVQO 4��. � °iap�j �i $ars a�aZ4 94i;g8 =8gg �iYN N'Y SS9 NM G� RS�Mgx�w��u� au� M M� N k iQ Y ;3- 71, Ti N O 6 tY N C �pp V it VNf a NiQr A,t ; oup� yO poY Tlu CL n it NuY yyis ssad oajsak �O 1A BSNi �u �e ew° off °c aew� 's- will— > S p u Y� iM E v �Ly O _ `` og 6 ^w N •N ,+u O wcs > E Gee. }q� &tea �,�� ��:t�y �w`c �,'•'"^ -° VaY7Zµ �R� O�yYNlMM �yG.Y.•'$` 0- Igg M`�u� SCOC �Ip� •'�-� ��� ++perp<'�,.c� C YR VN y O C .a ° Y O •�� a � q± c.N$ 3oeta$$iGtJ I 'I ^ > -NL O III °N ,yJ -a1 TEE �Sf Yp N.F O . yy � iQ � 3 � O � 01 �Y CC YYYdy�dCy YC O 4 T Qy� OY> GGGG Y�� L S> °5~iQ�p N tl�� C Ya Si Y�RV O N N t i d� N uu L a Y L Gu■ V fl CO�J3�MYL p 2 w r d� H N Ti ,dQ YY s qn �Y�M�YCy1YC»�C W s� Y1d O. $ tlLN WL Q« DDY d 6NJG pO 's N yy�� Y J- C S MawJ LP 7JN9 .0 N.wC M+~* ~� �S 'I H 4 CCq yyN _t N M 60 C' � �NL rpsY yyR a g24N 'w p E'y3y"[Q, r E R -B -21 TrV 1 Vd1 i is "ETC �Cri wl �y�aRS aS"FC'9' o rY p N� Y Y My M a'rYY Y it 4ftY.: Q Nr CV�i�71 FIN . N= a c f 61'4 eC43i�', A� C� ryJ gAxo €� '�° 5S �ocarJN� Lbw � +�A �4Ni 0.0 Q �pyMB r L__ 6Y��Nyy NNW L' MCYL Qf1 �sL1 2-2 w YP tttlM w�r ON 03N. Y *�yp, L CLr�4 rYG i,M` snYC µj}+!ayyL!O.pR t ^a. S�YL ^ ya Gb tp +p�� q�NCu y,L Vw`� C.QJ. �Oi T¢p {G�fl1 L Cr CN V r F4) A 9 1 III 4 O C OYf x � .MA 4w Y ON. e yx tv ash T Z►p�N�Si3�TC ��=� �� scL +.`�� N4� R A l�1 Mpy Ste. wYf Jt♦ r. iiR ^ w ^J aay 54-i 4L t Ay NO YC R a0 A yW y. V L ^� p rp` YK aS iCM C O��.r6 wy C,,X= K1. M Jul me V p a F Vpy e 2 p N �OA yr t4 r e p f• ,6 ei f,� +R w M� C'S.r�j T.7++ y+= A a y "� V N O ` V �` ■Z C_ap Y' w �VC G~ NVwp Wy L OLM YO�u�M u � ! C L O y YC9.Ct ap V w S� @70N K,x.. �VV L� L 6 p w L $r by wyF y ° ' a� �US!! Mw VLN,G '7Y *y ' L�"�.L.�Q xQ '�:SY d w Lr�. pi +�iQ ► Y 1Y +a'aC t1V� S 6 MI aTC pCS2YYrL p�S ■y �O Ns� ag �V �•�L�� V p�pwNwGYO. O��M VCw�N Rp AGZ +` C Y YC ��7 M V w V vy V R, y�iY.�ny C N�1 O y� C4i.aR R� V 1pIl V R G A:' L w S CCR + AwM wy V�iNLS C�tl by RqR r�R wtCS .p w g $pp,i1YY YpL�4 OeV iMyY Q V N��N EMy _C fig pp+!{w/M> t�'MYQJ 06 ?GyO 6 = a L M a ^ O y yy� Y V ,° Y U LL L MYY A ?, G� yy.. y Ulan' Y V R C L L G S: FL NQ <^NL Hw ty ..t �+'O�Vw xg, U m T r N H ti �I 11 Q ,I M W 0• E Pf 'V JO' b 0000 q. +uyc yi4w V�651.�tl �O Nye L L x LOq�YN ��}}Vt kM ag„•g1 yw N� O `YC O YEN Q C� S)yy��Njj y.•�l "pLN rAY tLY � Y S P b C >� ppLpp O'NY spy � 4 � Y.zpO'y�0'GYYLYL p^. 4w•r N O PQ qr�r .w �'T� yLG C. gW yLxAr � _ POI Yr M O�i L'by CS� CC L C�l`yyL. OOr �M y�,e v r6 AY � � C Ez4 Li ~ cua ^ ■ C L C C� Y� QY Or N `a Ni[ uu i L N t 3 Yob QiQwyy OIL tnSC'a 'O YiCN U L A N G C N Nw.^ �L4 YT r'i A'�Cw .Oi �� 4 SN w, �A fir^ A v N�•' ilk N q M YC C C Y Q L^ LOICy1� y Ax «�pL O`i�G U A ^ C Y � N C LT`X.°Cy uO6 �� "1 COL1 40 ANC' ° ^LEO �Q v ^y�y,�Y k.6 ^ dG4iY 3L 7 O `• w VY ^9Y O vY ~'JVy + O1V 017- C,9 �~ p 9M Kati C VAk^ fj'^ 1 Y`p C4•6N C C HLLwLiO�r+ pN M,: Q1� 4V L Y � �. a C1 O OTg (i qow g$ 4 ^i4 s LOeLaL3� ^ iR • y.r VU "pp �t ".Li l� i L �bi�rO _NM 6 N q : r U y2�y=i Y M MyL L Pf 'V JO' b 0000 q. +uyc yi4w V�651.�tl �O Nye L L x LOq�YN ��}}Vt kM ag„•g1 yw N� O `YC O YEN Q C� S)yy��Njj y.•�l "pLN rAY tLY � Y S P b C >� ppLpp O'NY spy � 4 � Y.zpO'y�0'GYYLYL p^. 4w•r N O PQ qr�r .w �'T� yLG C. gW yLxAr � _ POI Yr M O�i L'by CS� CC L C�l`yyL. OOr �M y�,e v r6 AY � � C Ez4 Li ~ cua ^ ■ C L C C� Y� QY Or N `a Ni[ uu i L N t 3 Yob QiQwyy OIL tnSC'a 'O YiCN U L A N G C N Nw.^ �L4 YT r'i A'�Cw .Oi �� 4 SN w, �A fir^ A v N�•' ilk N q M YC C C Y Q L^ LOICy1� y b C «�pL U A ^ C Y � N C Cw q ryyC 4gs'MTr. � u v ^y�y,�Y "S� C ^ dG4iY V > 7 O `• w VY ^9Y O Oa f6 AY � � C M1 6 iy ^ C4f OYi Or N `a Ni[ OO OVy q QiQwyy OIL tnSC'a F �� q Y pz ilk N q M YC C C Y Q L^ y 0 y b C VC}OY�.0 V > 7 O `• w VY ^9Y 4� a =D vY ~'JVy + O1V M1C 0 CN �~ p 9M Kati C VAk^ fj'^ 4 A r C O�.qC L 4^ M' 2 q C O NL �. a C1 O OTg (i qow g$ 4 �t ".Li L �bi�rO _NM 'VLr ACCC M MyL elpV N. yjYO�iL•• v a: E Cy6yy��� CLOG e q�y ,OC �+r3n Z. L•�i O Y� r- CypLp g,.AOL C° q y O� 4 C Y ~^ ,p • yC 49 N �.w L 'a .2 0{ QM a 4-12 yU� vy- 'fl Vyyy 11°I N LA V • L �~ � prop �C a4 C^ ^1 o C1+4° � C C� NNC a 7N f s■ y O Vr NrM 4 ` a <w N0 4Nr� i CON la%°N <V 40 O -CR ASK tvSi wl C C N M •t W J y ° ►�33 CCCLLL C 11C °wMY Y YC Y a N L 4 Y tY a�64 3 L ~ C A �oxsao a� 4•CC ate[ LA 4'V• N C G C Y w O ce•4•w ��; M^4c• n�iYa. "YEvy = °L W9. GY LIYC 1 L C H W :ia : IT rMYK �p,� � _i �O4 L ��OY =waN{N{��fi�. yyyyC�� � �`A Y �YC GYii ^{L�L yy Y'w 1r Y YM.�E c I.i g + � O w p ^ a'Lt v.GY w Y4 w. CcC w � Yi *M Y wNM 4S 0 v L y' LrN �I OL. jai-U] r uY Qy L 1M MYy; YL Y r yqN « _N S� I$ {V G utl Oz in. VOi 1 §r w.VY.Rk L 5i� Fri ai Nk pCC" Ww.L �. yp w YAR YN E C a CNp. O+ Q C 9 ♦ � = up $,- wEv3 w3L LwEA GZ> se :ia : IT rMYK �p,� � _i �O4 L ��OY =waN{N{��fi�. yyyyC�� � �`A Y uN'L[{j NN C r�Y ap� 9a0 Y YM.�E �6GVh I.i g + � � � -aP�Aw v.GY w Y4 w. CcC w � Yi *M Y C �I OL. jai-U] r uY Qy L 1M MYy; YL Y r yqN « _N S� I$ {V G utl L M N 64j M N w w c i M` 'LJ ' � S M yp w YAR J^{Y CC ��O E C a CNp. O+ Q C 9 ♦ � = V 9 p L64 6w0 V w tVq a � .CstM Yt {CtC ! LO 2 Y9 N �a OLI L }!aNC q YY wOs 914 3 2,; r 4y p Y V V G C L Y �p,� � �O4 L ��OY =waN{N{��fi�. yyyyC�� � �`A Y Epq. ■p�yOyw � � � G L wGY(. i' ~Ypa. Y YM.�E .Trt ei� I.i g + � F ti p M 1 PSI c v.GY w Y4 w. CcC w � Yi *M Y C �I 41-2 Y • L uY O Mp EQ Y r p 4 wG °°'ire II4:F w > V Y G.N., u r G ppi 41 N y ryyr � L� f,1 O Y _tePix £ Cl w N vN1'gw �a4 e2'vY�CO �•� p M�� a "' o g! >�Tr l�Ma N� i6� LZ L/ Osf �. �v, r ' c ^w p Y V V G C L Y N X L Y gg� L 8w Y a 9 v.GY w Y4 w. CcC w � Yi *M Y C c .2M= = OL. r uY ■� V1 `.a y I.N. MYy; YL Aii Nom' U 10 ' OYY L _ � Y.p y LL uG utl G ; .S d f I Lp Ih � 0 11 11 yp� G uy L v.GY w Y4 w. CcC w � Yi *M Y C c .2M= = O4 4tVLM N aaM ■� V1 `.a y I.N. MYy; YL Aii Nom' U 10 ' OYY L _ � Y.p y LL uG utl G ; .S d f I Lp CI V�Nn 2 Y9 N �a OLI L 04 6 0 11 11 a W YM1N v �!N• W NN 41 O ti A yy ,x�LY': aiL V« a4 Y•�«L.0 {� 6 3 P q M as yGOrR■g �q�� vM g�.�b• �'I��a�i a'� tp4w p� t' 2Seww. dw° 4 u . N if L AQ t� «'O L g V V GY 4 N M LY �; Oa ° A y u M aQ• � y 4 d « w Y MQ �� CC O a � t p1li MCA �{dj ��•• air %O 1[q0 W N'CT W V y C y� y N, a A M � 7 A M p M� Y M 'O M V4 W a N C a m L Y 3 4 y L g , a � � o2 « � V3( Y qM N Q3 L i Y Wy w 8 t Y ;y A Q � ■ .K'Q L LC Y +NO +y Mai CO Eli-, IT M"9 �y Z-3 nu r� � v G LSN� Via$ c< i e 'Y'S$fi ne ax :r ij yN tl w + C� y dip] Cp w1...0 r�1 N�Tr�Mr+ Ott ,Y p� of V�'� Q~�� Lr'�1�►gy� Y+� p r �p. � �i +t +►N 5,.. ,q w Y r �W M�' Yk"��. � v ti JL a s C L f+.G�� �� �VN# A� A Yom. q��K +M41Wi� �O4Y•�4 YUf lL L� R6` � � yyY w rrY CaViD �N♦ `yY���CCL }��� �.�G yY FC �.0 `"�"ii �j �N�•• V r'pNY L pLUyuY� yew Gt� F 6a M � �sCw 6�� O w L Y a f G y ri HalLL/ ��4wa yN rw a ss •a% yN�� o� °LS QR A Q 'Y NLT�M Y� O�� M_gp.Y VA 1Y�yOy CDJN Oy 3 _V L y■ LSV Y O � �.+yY. dY+M aO LM y°`Gw Y N N MC+•rO « ONy u Y) " d Q 4 VO qqL Cyr.. qcyN Y Y L G!r Vt^" LCLw K <k QQ,'L *,Z LL �+ y C Y rC w M o �+ L �La � g`s- A� C Y w Y L N N OIO • L�* Nay A j��i { ■G� N �I "I i Y9 �i 9 V M V �wa � g� SY �YY CS 4 v =N $^ o � ywy yy O y� �w�wR GeV C HVOi N� av a lvv q� K 99 rtL v N ay. �I I \11,141 � O O T 6 � Y L t ell px J gyry L Y l ui NL RVI O MLA S R V4 OI G N � Z Lit � � N Ur a� N'p � W war L A � r pRp y N R 7 O � t IS �8€ mr p Y to O y, Y 3LLL G � tlM L Y C O 4 I.11 PI fI�YCY O� Ate+' Y! a- ,. Nr Gt G ryC R t`Y yY ►J. yY pA 1. Y N Vw MYT 44C pqV «C 4ylN�Y y� C-5 2'ap O•NO `'� iN'v Oy�Nq a C o Yq «O' iti i o' Y Li R ii w L n! N j o Z s'.. ago NO `p� y a a1 E 2 i- �pp�++ XB a96O ^ ^ '� � ^ �� ^ ■ rp L � y� A pp gU qL{y ' � ey ^'� ap ++.� VC y��M Y"11r SN� MgI MY guwm $� ~�w r fi H —1 s LL �+ y C Y rC w M o �+ L �La � g`s- A� C Y w Y L N N OIO • L�* Nay A j��i { ■G� N �I "I i Y9 �i 9 V M V �wa � g� SY �YY CS 4 v =N $^ o � ywy yy O y� �w�wR GeV C HVOi N� av a lvv q� K 99 rtL v N ay. �I I \11,141 � O O T 6 � Y L t ell px J gyry L Y l ui NL RVI O MLA S R V4 OI G N � Z Lit � � N Ur a� N'p � W war L A � r pRp y N R 7 O � t IS �8€ mr p Y to O y, Y 3LLL G � tlM L Y C O 4 I.11 PI fI�YCY O� Ate+' Y! a- Gt G ryC R t`Y yY ►J. yY pA 1. Y N Vw MYT 44C pqV «C 4ylN�Y y� C-5 2'ap O•NO iN'v wags{ *149 �I �I x� F� E � . d W i a yy c 06 °IY V �Lx to L . "GG aye 9. M^ A u a YM�C!!I G orw �c Y° w tttLptttp����a ppY G Y _ ryP= �M x1N� C L1�N V�Y L N V aiL G JyN b� -la x �Sy� IL y:5 paw 9L M YGGG Y Y M O v N Lqp Lw v y y NY Y YLV -Egg: I r.�ss► .$L' >> a; �w �C `iyp. p ^O C.y{.. 0C4 L C V+V N I r -a �.w� � ^N E rV V iC� Z U NwpC OttYYY SY° y■� �(gYUt ° �C,. p @�6yyi OV� MrY 4p �'C?p �O O.L. >C .v 6w� •N�L1� °� M ■` +E^ �ayC "jj O A�YV M.y CGM �L+L V ftY� EV LG ^C w O��N �M L Y Y.3YC f. yYC {ppyY C pyW,� K W Y � DATE: TO: FROM: BY:I, SUBJECT: GrTY OF RANOHG' AMONGGA STAFF REPORT r 'tbv"er 25, 1987 1977 Chairman and Membe4of the Planning Commission Bra Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, Associate Planner V, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13748 res n a subdivision `and design rev' ew! of "aing e family lots an 55 acres of land in ,,. the Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling un =ts per acre) and Flood Control Districts, located at the northwest corner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue - APN: A portion of 201- 271 -415, Associated with the project is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of 19 mature trees. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10972 - . subdivision o acres 57 _, � into parses n Medium Residential District (8�\ 14 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest`= corner of Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street - AP'k 201 -271- 55. These items were scheduled for the Planning Commission meeting with the understanding that the applicant would obtain a letter from the San Bernardino County Flood Control 9istrict agreeing in general to certain drainage concepts. T�%,date, no letter has been received from the Flood Control District. Asa result, all pertinent information has not been obtained. Therefore, staff recommends that this item be continued to the December 9, 1987 meeting. The applicant has agreed to the - �,ontinuance in the attached letter. Resp ully submitted, Bra B City anner BB :SM:te Attachment: Letter From Applicant ITEM'S U,V { Novsmber 9, tool- m Mr. Soot-, Murphy Cite of Rancho Cucamonga 9520 Baseline Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 ,R Subject: Tentative Parcel Map 10972 TeAtative Tract Map 13748 Dear Mr. Murphy: Prior to the scheduled Planning Oommisa3on hearing of Novembor 25, f 1987, Ahmanson Developments will provide to tho City a letter (road l{ San Bernardino: County Flood Control addre"ing a dew t€n of Tentative Tract 18748. Mr. Robert Coroh+sro of t% F. Control District Verbally agrees with our design conc3 pt and in presertly compiling Flood Control comments in carder to ate the latter; therefore, I don't ainticipatee diffieulty in -obtaining such a letter. It the City .!'Rancho Cucamonga does not receive the letter prior to the hearing date, Ahmanson Developments agrees to have the hearing � continued until the City does reoeive it. Very truly you , 7e Crai Pia¢o Vice President ul v~ t f I Jr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF I ;4PORT U l DATE: November 25, 1987 1977 10: Chairman and Members of the planning Cwim rsion FROM: Brad Buller, City .Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: MINIMUV,,LOT SIZE /UNIT_SIZE MARKET STUDY DISCUSSION I. ABSTRACT` t "fie planning Commission and City Codncil have received presen aions on the warketi'' study. Tonight, staff had�'\'SCheduled for Commission discussion of�the conclus,ons and recd tlldations of the market stud. II. MARKET STUDY FINDINGS: The following is a brief summary of the Tin clings containeci in the report: A. Conclusions: 1. Rancho Cucamonga is among the fastest growing cities in Southern California., 2. Strong demand exists for housing in Rancho Clµ°amonga. 3. Majority of homebuyers are first -time Duyem. 4. Housing market is in trr.nsition toward move -up Nyers seeking larger lot and larger Norse. 5. Rancho Cucamonga 's'geographi�!.lbcation and transportation access is mayor factor is continued growth, 6. A 1,000 square foot increase in lot size nay increase sales price by $16,770 which would disqualify over 11 percent of existing residents. 7. Severe restrictions on amount, of affordable housing can create geographj,c Imbalance between employment and housing for thos_`'employed locally. 8. Provaed restrictions should not be ,K4 restrictive and should be flexible to accommodate new,"..sign techniques. 9. Small lot detached product meets a need in marketplace, particularly in planned cesamunitias. ITEM W` „ x rN71 PLANNING C(M It S�i� ART � � � I , , M1NIW M LOT' SZE J. UNIT fl JIDY November 26 gs -, Page f _ M 10. Consideration-may be given to restricting 4bant of small lot development to a fixed percentage_,of'a buii'be.� #ota7 project. Common open space may tie required`fDr -tmall lot tracts, -; 11. Hume prices increase ac; lot size increase, which may leave less money for fret -► r4 18- 4scaping. . 1. P0 1t prohibit small lot, single fam0y detacho6 hrLsing. 'Y 2. Assure balance of housing product types. a) Reasonable annual limits-'on small lot,- ot pi�ojects or setting fixed percentage of small lot hives out of a builders total production. b) Don't set rigid 'guidelines. Rather, cnedurage variety of innovative product AJpes through review proces,� c) Require `','andscaping to mitigate small lot conr,;:^ns. r, 3. Proposed minimum lot sizes are too restrictive. Suggest. Possible Unit Size Schedule ; Single Family -=h 900 sq ft.* Mul ti- Family: LM Zone 900,sq. ft.** M Zone 900 sq. ft.** MR 800 sq. ft.** Zone 700 sq, ft.**,', *Less permitted with a CUP **100 sq. ft. reduction permitted on 10% of the 4. Survey housing consumer to determine conr4na ty housing needs. ` S. Solicit technical aQ,ice for benign guidelines from architects and land pl4hs. �a 3r t y 711 . -:. _ Jd P j KM I-4 'iJ1 L STUD _ ^'' •==; Page 3''' } z ` 8.:: 8jei M pyrv�vots� approuad or Constructed to see jpropose�d(,,ry at works And l*4t doers! ". tC -! 7. SoiiGit N t fru 'Other cities, BIA and consumers in the j _ inl and (rr itEC"ENDM 0M Stn'ff recor mds that tlb " T.n =Is, ion discuss hesc AN gftvi ci� -4 di r ion's on i ocdrporati ng these k oncicsioK AM reci om nda ores into state,,- final analysis and recomtndatiot" . on ire ordimonce changes relating to Small IotissulI unit regul *'tins, fully s itt ernner A BB: DC ;kck r f r if l j Peal §.rwik r1 T ees�R'§= aSFut}�CAacountat�ts �r` Fast marvO tl"I Ot Co. 225 ftattu t Suite "1400 Telephone 619 233 M Wacopier 619 866 QC11 San Diego, CA 92'01 i a f R."OHO CUC I;Glt._CITY COUNCIL FNT.;�T ION : WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER is, 1987 I 1 S � t �A. .g.... , , - --_ 3 `t, �iTM . r l I. PROBLEM DEFINITION r A. Increased small -lot, single - family detached development B. Concern over mitaimum unit size II.. CONCLUSIONS A. There was some inferior development quality exhibited with small -tat product. q B. The majority of product now being constructed is of high quality and b,r experienced builders. �� C. Current product being developed is mostly Iin master - planned communities which contribute open spate , pedestrian _walkways, landscaped medians, parks, schools �nd other community facilities to the City. D. In resent years the majority of buyers have. be, first -time buying households. 1A 51 E. in the past year there is a notable trend of move -' up households purchasing housing in Rancho Cucamonga. These buyers desire laxger homes and can afford more expensive homes. This As')* natural •prpSression =in the marketplace. F. An increase in the minimum lot size of 1,000 square feet may increase the price of a finished home approximately 316, :`J0, based on the increase in the cost of lnnd and and other component costs associated with housing production. In Rancho Cucamonga, this change in affordability would disqualify over 11 percent of the existing households from homeownership, or about one out of every-Nine households. An increase in minimum lot size also has notable Implications on housing affordability. III. RECOMMENDATIONS A. .e recommend that the minimuis lot sizib not We ° increased to prohibit small -lot, single fatllj deter _ developmt"nt. - 2 - �- �V A,41 � , j 1� l a,. . 11 1 , It provides affordable housing for many homebuying segments ' and meets th / design and., functional needs of many homebuyin.Y segments. Additionally, we dko not recommend an increaser in the minimum unit size for detached units as certain household segments can be economically and functionally accommodated in product smaller than this contemplated minimum. B. Instead of rigid development guidelines for approvals, we recommend that a design review' procedure allow homebuilders "to match household characteristics with economic and functional needs, but still be subject to the design review process- so the City of Rancho Cucamonga can control development quality. C. The housing' consumer 'may be initially and regularly surveyed to provide valuable info mation_ `:a determine what form of housing truly meets the needs of`'�he community. A The City may consider soliciting detailed technical advice f ,,,om for design guidelines -- based on homebuyer surveys--from a group of architects and land planners who have proven reputations for responding to the challenges of this form of urban design. E. The city may conduct an ongoing field review of product which has been proposed, approved and constructed in Rancho Cucamonga. This process, may be a valuable learning tool for both the City and the development community as well as promoting,, commzxnicaatione. N. We believe this is a regional issue and suggest the City of Rancho Cucamonga calimunicate with surrounding municipalities regarding IIlanning issues. Rancho Cucamonga's location, proximL't%j, to transportation and employment base create significant interaction with surrounding areas. We believe that the city may benefit from coordinated Manning efforts. The development and maintenance of effective, communications between those living in the city and those making planning decisions may help Rancho Cucamonga continue to provide a -- 3 - t � e �.. -a ;..,:+. � ,:; ' "'±q ,..a � d rte' ,' ' ;n _ - "n�,• ' � ?. Superior living eaVironment. This enhancement of the l communication prooe3a may extend; to Surrounding., 7 , municipalities with the same mutual benefit. a.. G u _ ,t P+Rdif M1�1�.000wsf Raa�rM.a corawting Qtoup ftm mwwi* MAWS �IK !yam .. ' 7 Yy�. tt pryer 9roMdwnY 3�t0'I:Ob TOWOO*619233 yY ray � h •.•grvf^v ��l M� San D13^ Cal. S2101 .. 4i r, flr!..h_,_ I� rm OF IiANO'k) t lRi'.AMONWk L �G RANCRO CtrgAMRoA ort MARXR %� � :;� t►�►ktti � t -,, r6 ANALYSIS iii' RASKIWORM r DaUt Octobq►r, 1567 Far - The City (d Rancho Cuouwng* The Ruilj�ng Enduetry Aeeociaaticn, Saidy View Region ad [A' Chapter 2 2.1 Preface There are two salient trends in Rancho Cucamonga's housing market which create the challenge of small lot development and small unit development which this study addresses: 1. Lifestyles are changing. People have less truly discretionary time, and what they have, they do, not went to spend It maintaining a home. This createef'demand for smaller lot detached housing and smaller unit sizes for attached and detached.housing. Commensurate with th�ts need for smaller lot sizes and smaller units Is the expe6tation' that design be functional and attractive. 2. Affordability constraints rob many household /of their insatiable dream to own a home and have J� family investment. The constraint causes some honebifyers to compromise their living environment to a degree where the home they are willing to buy--just to own one-- ( less than the quality they desire. If poorly done, tV,ese higher density projects can create a less desirefke future environment. So one Important trend (lifestyle) Iiidicates increased demand for smaller lots and units, and another (affordability) indicates that people may buy detached homes 5 on smaller lots or units of a smaller size than the consumer may desire. Other factors should be considered, such as,. "What will x.as ko Oucamonga's demographic make -up be in the medium and long,:.�era future ?" "How do other c �y- imposed giidelines (such as development fees required tcl,be paid by developers), impact housing costs ?" These are some issues to be addressed in creating r. framework far coax fun) fiy development. 2.2 Recommendations Our recommendations fGilow. The language presents our suggestions te-thlmr) building community in general -- including our client the < <slding industry and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. �.s I. We recommend not prohibiting small -lot, single family detached housing development. It provides desperately. needed affordable housing and meets the deeign and functional criteria of many homebwyIng segments now entering the Rancho Cucamonga housing market, and those expected to be future homebuyers. • Thy city may want to assure that a balance of housing configurations be provided to homebuyers to accommodate the breadth of homebuying segments in the marketplace, including those needing and wanting smaller -lot detached homes. If an imbalance is perceived, now or In the future, balanced production may be achieved by placing an reasonable annual limit on the number of small -lot projects authorized, or by requiring that a builder have a maximum: percentage of his - 6 �. total production,.: in the small -lot configuration, A reasonable distribution may be up to 25 porcent of the cities total housing }production to be on lots smaller than 5,000 square feet. The objective is to promote a fixture of housing desig_i and price. , will attract a var. .A.ety of people. We wish to avoid,;'x+r)sident and design homogeri ;' ty. We do not believe than cut, ent production of *Mal r -lot product Is excessive relatl",�o Rancho Cucamonga'% position within the Inland Empire regf6h, the city's pro,timity to major freeways and employment centers, and the quality of development. ` Most D -roduct with lots \3n the 5,000 a range -- combined with community facilitiese such otasndschools, parks and open space -- provide housing well - suite; for most homebuying segments and their economic and lifestyle needs. We do not suggest rigid``: guidelines for smah-lot housing configuration. Rather, a system which ,Mrill allow a selection from or combination of center plot, zero-lot-line product, duplex and triplexes and wide /shallow lot configurations may be established. Each site plan and homebuying segment deserves consideration of all designer; available. We suggest that these design = approvals be' established in a special review procedure. Innovative product may be required, but flexibility to provide 'it should be maintained. City Planning staff has identified several design concepts which can Produce attractive small -lot housing. These are attractive configurations, but they are not all of t`'e possible options. New designs are evolving and may be accommodated as developed and submitted to the panning department. The following pagas include many design* which may produce an attractive neighborhood while meeting affordability needs of a portion of the homebuyi" market. Included is a "cluster" housing concept which can reduce site development costs about 33 percent while producing a visually attractive and, stimulating neighborhood. These are among the options which may be' considered in Rancho Cucamonga. The most important aspect about designing homes for the market segments listed on this matrix is that they have a variety of functional and lifestyle needs, in addition to financial capabilities:' We therefore believe it is, best if each project be considered for its target market plus site feasibility criteria, such as topography, slope, surrounding land users and infrastructure -- to select the best combination of design options which best m�ret the needs of all parties. Our conclusion is that strictly legislated technical development guide - lines impair design flexibility -- therefore integrity -- where it is needatd most in Rancho ,t Cucamonga. i Higher density housing presents unique design challenges and warrants a flexible design and approval process. We do not believe that the approval process should include rezoning, specifi use or conditional use approval. Yf is often difficult to educate the citizen about the nuances of higher density housing design. Therefore, they often react negatively without a full understanding of a project's true character and to the detriment of other consumer* whose main hurdle in affordability. These processes also acid to the - 14 We believe that among the most important tools with which to overcome visual constraints of small -lot projects is landecapix1g. Landscaping is a universal and very powerful tool in toe world of urban design. It may be utilized to overcome many issues with which the city is concerned, This >_% has been successfully accomplished in recently cons�oucted small -lot detached projects in Rancho Cucamonga. A matrix of pc+,psible design options for small lot single family home production is shown on the following page, This Includes 'an identification of homebuying segments. lot design options, architectural themes, landscape alternatives and possible technical specifications. This matrix, or a further defined version, may be utilized as a "menu" which builders and the ^ity can configure residential projects which meet the financial and lifestyle needs of. the homebuyer as well as the design integrity desired by the City, The most important aspect about designing homes for the market segments listed on this matrix is that they have a variety of functional and lifestyle needs, in addition to financial capabilities:' We therefore believe it is, best if each project be considered for its target market plus site feasibility criteria, such as topography, slope, surrounding land users and infrastructure -- to select the best combination of design options which best m�ret the needs of all parties. Our conclusion is that strictly legislated technical development guide - lines impair design flexibility -- therefore integrity -- where it is needatd most in Rancho ,t Cucamonga. i Higher density housing presents unique design challenges and warrants a flexible design and approval process. We do not believe that the approval process should include rezoning, specifi use or conditional use approval. Yf is often difficult to educate the citizen about the nuances of higher density housing design. Therefore, they often react negatively without a full understanding of a project's true character and to the detriment of other consumer* whose main hurdle in affordability. These processes also acid to the - 14 If cost of a home, a result we are trying to overcome. A consistent, predictable approval procese will best suit the needs of the city, the builder and the citizens. The review committee approach to project approval is one of the most effectrNe plan review techniques. This is brings ringstogetherc all agencies ansubdivision epartments Invoived gforna meeting ;with the applicant. All comments are conveyed personally. Conflicts can 'be resolved with the benefit of Interaction and brainstorming. The applicant loeves a review committee meeting knowing,,, exactly what is required for approval. If a problem or problems cannot be revolved, the planning commission can serve as arLltrator. OU Anqther Common solution is for the I�,el government to give the planning director osi1 equivalent �tersonn,%l the authority for administrative approval without t.: -.r+31 hearing before the planning rommiselon. These, two n_lternatives generally work well for the subdiO sion of land. A third passible approach is the pre-application conference., a !Can be utilized for the subdivision process and site plan review. The objective of this approval is to give the applicant the opportunity to meet,with local plan reviewers prior to making a final application for projec�. approval. This approach can help avnid delays and misinterpretations. It can be d1ecretionary at the option of the applicant, who assumes 1= °a associated with eliminating this stage of the approval' Process. The city may request that developers incorporate one or more landscape amenities in small lot projects, in addition to d-sign criteria for lot configuration, architecture and other hardscape itsme. 3. We believe that minimum unit sizes contemplated for attached and detached product are, too restrictive. Attractive and functional units cal be designed below proposed minimums. We understand that the primary objective —_ of establishing minimum unit size standards is to prohibit \ unite so small that little or no pride of ownership or- -,' occupancy would be projected L,n the way which homes rre IRV maintained. Additionally, the c-ty wrieh*& to avoAA projects which contain a substantial poxtion or all of .A r units with equare footages bellow normally acceptable levels. We believe that u ze Alan* does not dictate the integrity or quality of at home or the pride with which It will ba occupied. If poorlp designed, developed and marketed, a small unit will generally look even smaller. , However, when well planned, developed and marketed, a small unit can come alive providixsg a functional'-j' affordable and ple *nt living environment. Therefore, we suggest that m1n1wum,un2t sizes not be gIite as restrictive as contemplated and be de .f 6d a¢ shows; CA the followring.page. For single family housing, we suggest that the current Soo square foot mini7uat be maintained, along with the provision thast<. Rey smaller units be authorized through the oonditl.,�%ei ulae permit approval process. Utilizing the cgnditiortal approval process only for projects with unite less than 900 square feet would avoid costly review during the approval process unl4ses units were below a reasonable size. Multi- faully housing can bo effectively and attractively desig -1d with unit sizes below the limits proposed for considkT*tion. Several examples are shown on the following Pages. These units are designed for a multiplex building and show innotative der >lgn and efficient use of space. They can meet the :needs of many household sequents, including singlos, young cuuples and Rove -down or retiree honseholds. Our suggestion ie that minimums be e®tabiished at least So- to 100 square feet below the proposed six**. Further, ten percent of these units may be below suggested levels. Its all cases, the final configuration and rharaecter of units may be subject to reviews by planning staff through an enhanced design reviews process to control the character of product developed in Rancho Cucamor:ya. 4. The housing consuAer may be initially and regularly surveyed to provide valuable information to determfite what form of housing truly meets the needs of the cesa%%uaity. This may be accomplished: with ass�ta:tce from the buildinq cox,munity by utilizing mailing lit,%ts =of hosebuyers. Pent Marwick /Goodkln can prov ;de a e',"stionnaire for this survey. 17 ContinueA- aux"•Oying on an annual or 'temiannual schedule\'wtll refine the communication PROcEqS 'between -146,e homebuyer, City of Raftcho Cucamonga and the builder. A well established communication process CA► ensure longevity, provide feedback, Interpretation and monitor changes In demographics of residents in the co*Munity, 5. Solicit detailed technical ad; T40e for design guidelines--based on homeboyer aettrveya a group of architects and land Plaftntii-s who have provert-rao.gt4ptjone for responding to the challenges of this form of uAU --design. All of the architects and-land Planners interviewed for this study indicated stVOA9 IntvrOst In contributing time tc the process. We suggest that the topography of Rancho Cucamonga land, hosebuying segments an tine cities health and safety guidelines be consid1red when working with these professional groups. The City has Indicated that the Low-Medium 'nensity designatiort was created to allow developers to produce innovative design, and that. much pro('.uct- developed in past years does not meet their expectations. Car observation Is that recently almost all builders, huve been producing innovative design in the Low-Medium density rain % But some do notA nor do all have the talent or re;�:_rcse to produce JZsigris which meet city standards of innovation. In these Instance*, we believe that the challenge Is then- Placed an the city and building Industry to provide further guidance while maintaining reasonwAble control of final plans approved. tie therefore suggest that the city further define the design Options available in the Industry today, and those which the city feels are appropriate. This can be achlevod through the process outlined above. This recommendations euggests that the city (and the building Industry) "go the extra mile" and provide design Ideas based on homeowner feedback, bulla`r Input and designer expertise. 21 Em ti s z i 5. In addition to soliciting Information from homeowners and design profe-jsionals, we believe there is an opportunity to gain knowledge from a de "ailesd review of projects proposed, approved and construct9d in rancho Cucamonga. This may Include single - family residential, multi- family residential and commercial projects. The city can analyze projects Which have been developed for. 1) zhair final appearsac3 relative to that envisioned by the planning department; 2) 'what has been successful relative to the consumer; and 3) new deal -in ideas which can be generated by the analysis or +xh1ch have been implemented: in the marketplace. A local analysis may allow mores participants in the decision making process while praoiding the City with relevant, experience from the lor;al TAarketplace. 7. This is a regional isine. The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the building industry can make an effort to solicit Input' from. government agencies, building industry participants and consumers in ths- western Inland Empire. Recommendations number 3, 4 and s are not ,costly. Nor do they take long to plan and Implement. They do provide fundamental information !'or decia.�on soaking relative to the challenge before the building industry and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The challenge, in our opinion., Cops beyond the technical Question of what guidelines to place on development in the Low - Medium density ranges. If those with plan. -_?X)g - responsibility and tce citizenry reject development quality and the ability of infrastructure to accommodate growth, elow•- growth or no- growth attitudes are likely to prevail. The best solution is one which is reliable, that provides predict.ole guidelineo, and that is responsible and which ultimately truly represents the broader public interest. The approach outlined above would present an objective process with which to work toward a solution, We Kish to avoid the process with which decision make's assume they know what is best for those concerned. The process outlined above may also allow Rancho Cucamonga to take a unique, 23 . r� - 24 . r� I 11 10 Chapter 3 C014CLUSIONS This chaptar acntains a summary of 'important statistics and trends from market research. Detailed data and analysis are fou %d In the Market Analysis and Appendi -es to this 11��Vart. I. Rancho Cucamonga is among Southerin Calliornia's fastest growing cities. It is now sOcOr -d largest in the Inland Empire West region. Because ol� employment growth projections and land availability, Rancho Cucamonga will become the largest in tine area in terms of pcapulation and emplcyment. 2. There is strong demand for housing in Rancho Cucamonga. It is now one of Southern California's strongest housing markets. Home sales are averaging abTAt twO units per week Per project gor detached projects, 3. Th, majority of homebuyere have been first -tune buyIng- households. Many commute to other areas for jobs and choose to live in Rancho Cucamonga for affordability reason. About half of the hou3eholds have children. About half are two- - income families. Seventy -five to eighty percent are married. The average income is about $40,000. There is a transition occurring in the market where an incret.ising portion of the total homebuying miir- is represented by move -up buyers, This is a natural :rransition for an expanding community as families mature after several years in their first home and desire more space. These buyers generally need a larger home and lot than the first -time homebuyers. The short - and medium -term future a 25 - 1 /1 10 Chapter 3 C014CLUSIONS This chaptar acntains a summary of 'important statistics and trends from market research. Detailed data and analysis are fou %d In the Market Analysis and Appendi -es to this 11��Vart. I. Rancho Cucamonga is among Southerin Calliornia's fastest growing cities. It is now sOcOr -d largest in the Inland Empire West region. Because ol� employment growth projections and land availability, Rancho Cucamonga will become the largest in tine area in terms of pcapulation and emplcyment. 2. There is strong demand for housing in Rancho Cucamonga. It is now one of Southern California's strongest housing markets. Home sales are averaging abTAt twO units per week Per project gor detached projects, 3. Th, majority of homebuyere have been first -tune buyIng- households. Many commute to other areas for jobs and choose to live in Rancho Cucamonga for affordability reason. About half of the hou3eholds have children. About half are two- - income families. Seventy -five to eighty percent are married. The average income is about $40,000. There is a transition occurring in the market where an incret.ising portion of the total homebuying miir- is represented by move -up buyers, This is a natural :rransition for an expanding community as families mature after several years in their first home and desire more space. These buyers generally need a larger home and lot than the first -time homebuyers. The short - and medium -term future a 25 - r� 4j should provide an increasing amo *ant of iaove -up buyers and first -time buying housaholds mature and as local employment gener4tion drawn mature families. But price sen,,q Live, Younger buyers should represent the largest portioni of the market. 5. The geographic location send transportation access of Rancho Cucamonga is a major fact6i contributing to past growth and expected future expansion. Proximity to the I -16 and I -15 freeways is a very positive attribute, allowing residents easy access to housing and businesses easy access to comiarce centers. Transportation is becoming a key factor in Southern California. f. An increase in lot size of 1,000 square feet may increase the price of a finished home approximately $16,770, based on the increase in land cost ° and other component costa of ~I housing pro4iiation. In Rancho Cucamonga, this change in affordabilit'r� would disqualify over it percent of the City *s existing residents from homeownership, or about one out of every nine households. These households would have to rent or look elsewhere to purchase a less expensive horse. We have analyzed this change in lot give >,hder various purchase assumption!, including a changing Aoan -to -value ratio and changing interest rates. This analyisis indicates that a ;substantial potition of existing Rancho Cucamonga househgJda would be affected by the changers. Additionally, because many of the homebuyers now moving to Rancho Cucamonnga have incomes which fall intq�a such narrower range thanPrepresented by the city overall, '%.a believe that the impact to new homebuyers would be greater than we have �Jtatlstically quantified. 7. We fear lthaft severe restrictions on the amount of affordable housing which can be developed in a city can create a geographic imbalance between employment and housing for those employed locally. This imbalance exists in several other Southern California areas. The relationship between Orange County employment and housing in the Inland Empire is a glaring example of how this situation burdens the entire regional transportation system, having far greaten implications than would - 27 ,cr^ well - planned, affordable higher density development on a single city. ` 8. Setting forth parameters such as outlined in Planning Staff's memorandum to the Planning Commiession is not unreasonab',,e. But we have tWo caveats We suggest that the guidelines not be so restrictive, and that flexibility be maintained for better solutions for each piece of property as design capabilitiee change. 9. We believe that there are many households that ideally fit in a small -lot detached product. Master planned communities are pro' " ° °cing attractive overall environments for housing, Thy :31ghborhoods overall look superior to standard sub(2Iv33io ;a. victoria is an example of a planned community with ,streets which are among Rancho Cucamonga's most attractive, including grass berms, walkways, parks, detai;:ed signage altd ether quality infrastructure such as bridges and entry monu'aents. The trade offs are in favor of the community overall. These balanced communities accommodate long term changes in lifeetylec. 10. We believe that consideration may be g1ven tb restricting the amount of small lot development to a fixed percentage of a buildere total housing production. Thisa would guarantee that a balance was created. Additionally, a minimum amount of common area dedication may be required for projects with lotsa,, of less than, 'tor example, 5,000 square feet. This would ensure that the community benefits of small -lot development would be realized. Housing developments of lose than 50 to 100 units may not be able to bear the economic burrian of this common area dedication, therefore restricting development of smaller -lot homes to being a component of larger communities. 11. Aa lot size increases, so does the cost of a home. Additionally, not only are households burdened with the up front increased cost of a home, but they are Immediately faced with the task and expense of landscaping a larger yard. In many budget constrained households, these yards can go for extended periods without landscaping, and -when finally landscaped, budget constraints can provide an -32- s ,w inferior Yard and streetacape for the life of the ' neighborhood. This uncertainty 13 reduced if a smaller lot is ps{dvid:ed for those households with: incomes r1ot aufficlent to purchase and if landscaping, particularly 3z. the front yard is included n with purchase. f: 7 F� -4 r F n 7 � k ��/ �_ :� n _„ x�4 ., �. �� -� .. �.., .N .� � '� � r� r � ,�.,�,�, ,_ � - , �. { .�� r;� �, `. _- ���� �-- . __ �� The following letter was sent to the people listed below= Mr, and Mrs. 8amltn 8314 Linden Lane Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 _ Ms. Audrey Jackson 6346 Saud Street w Alta Loma, CA 91701 Mr. and Mrs. Bement ' 8495 Pumalo Alta Loma, CA 41701 j.. Mr. and Mrs., Robert Green 5729 Napa Court Alta Lorne:, CA 91701 Mrs. Virginia. Buckholder 9997 Victoria Street Alta Lama, CA 91701 , Mr. Henry Ford 5730 Trotters Lane Alta Loma, CA 91701 Mr. Jeffrey R. Green 5861 Sacramento Avedue Alta Loma, CA 91701 Ms. Nancy Green 5861 Sacramento Alta Loma, CA 91701 Ms. Cindy Davenport "? 2114 Caroline Drive Ontario, CA 91764 Mr. Charles A. Blanding -• D 9009 Appaloosa Court Alta Loma, CA 91701 E" � Ciit ii' +6jP(���+C1 4''�irAMG?NGA ea�c ae�es.� sat,. �.,,.a�n >•a.�e.�,. bla.� 9;� k x�= November 18,r 1987 I i ` Ms. Audrey Jackson 6346 Sard Street 1 _ L CA 91Y0 Al a Loma. t RE: CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT RENENAL CUP 84 -21 Dear Ns. 4640n. Thank you for your recent letter regarding CUP 84 -21< The matter you are referring to is sch duled to be heard by the PIa Commission on November 25, 1987, during the public hearing se9wAnt of meeting. Normally, the City Council does not hear matters bq the Pia G Commission unless an appeal of the Planning Commission decision is filed the City Council. I have taken the liberty of forwarding your lett to me to the Pla Commission, in order that they will have that letter as part of consideration of this matter. Should you have any questions as a result o above, please feel free to contact me at your earliett opportunity. Thank your for taking the time to share your thoughts with me on this matter Sincerely, ') Charles (Chuck) J. Buquet Counci' man CJB:lr t Comm xqw Debatah N Hnowa Jeffn $3ey uq . -. Do"]$ L ftut CMR]" J. %qw 11 PmelaJ. ripLt I twra l tiV � I V '1 t - f Alf Af- J i f v. Ze* F07 9AA �+ QnC'�t.4 i�tt�GCtx c , C,, 1/7.30 ZIP ?X-.21. J . � t et .carte X ,� de e ac � � � e, r� .�O�f!,�axbcd�e. ..Grre Q.ue �.cJ �QnG�C�et�Kl.c�ar� - Ct�cGZ` �". f � �c -rc,� � � �t>'��ac.c.�tt•t� xa Se'.n.�.c,C.f. a��� '�17` � e2.G.c .u'.(f , � ,7 c..'tc - \ 03`61 Saersgmonto Av*nue I� Alta GA 917011 Loma, November 16, 1987 Mr. Charles J. Buquet II, Couacilmowber City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucaaonga, CA 9-1734 ` Dear Mr. Buquets I would like to add Aj* voioc to tho' sse requesting year . assistance in support of renewing Condltic.n;l Use Permit 84- This C.U.P. provided for conversion of an adjaoentk'single family residence purchased by our church, Alta Lomr,�Christian Church, to an ©ffiee. The tine extension for SCUP 9,721 will expire on November 28., 1983. One of the factors af:t0ysting its renewal is the Yiti-c�sc4ping of our 3.4 acre :field \ ust north of the church buildings. We have b*en able to meet the requirements of the Planning Department and the landscaping proDect will be completed this month through the seeding of a groundcover. Renewal of CUP 84 -21 will be considered at the Planning Commissions public hearing on November 25th„ As a twelve year homeowner in Rancho Cucamonga, I would deeply appreeia`.e- any effort you can make in support of renewal of CUP 84 -21. Sine rely, Jeffrey R. reen _ 1,1 'PNA^' 1 November 13 1587 I 9009 Appaloosa Ct- Alta Lama, CA 91701 i - Mr. Charles J. gucr et II, Councilmember City of Rancho eucamonaa P. O. Box $07a ' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 Dear Mr. Buquatn F, I am a member of the Alta`�,u a- Christian Chu=h and as a voting citizen of this City 'for twelve years, I would _like to request your support in the renewal of the Condit•onal` 1e Pormit fcrr `•' our church office (Permit No. 84 -21). ` This permit provide ',is for thY` conversion of a single residence that we purchased for use as a church off ,ve. The Planniag Cbmmission is having a public hearing on November ^; 25th and I would appreciate anything you do in support of this renewal ;3s it is very important to me and My church. 7 Yours sincerely, Charles s A. 5 anding ,f J $ ME i ,i•(.�.��'�.i( -� C�Lr'l wA C.x' �'�..(_,L�y1r�.jCrQi 1.{�j i+2-�„ �..J'j.. I ...�.• l�K -T la�+ y1 Cy,fC.T ice) C,�J • V • (- -- „% <r F .�(f”! v�.�liP t+ � k:+ ly�.�_�p / 7 � /lF,i� � �!` ate".. -C �'��� }i•4�j/ �`^ tiS. , }— 7 �iEfcC e� L aa, 1. r r jj 11-1 ILI- tyY2d e. .t rc7 ZZL ��` �L�L� ,fit-- rc.�LLrec.�s _.d-�i C',�- �c.,Cc�<,>••�s.+c. y✓�,Q -G �,.�rn.tz� �'� -a'�, t - LtLtP .t•t zct� �,i�C../C. � .i -wL� C�LC�:C� 1C �"--�'•x +�.J .'�c�"[ -tti �/ �° � rf { � ,cUC_t= cz� .�u.,�.e�K..�a.� - �•-a -� �-' �,C'- k•�`._..c.c_.ki .�6 <a�; . - / C G 3+- E -6L'ZC .-. / LC "'�- � -l:./ GK- �f. "f.€ -L._�/ y { tc- �cr�.•'�ie ... ,.. CWe- *. �j a t *ry ���.� �,� _r" ^"�'oK =. t`w�°'*'�ig ➢M ^;J,"? dS'k• Y x 4t�z`� 9��` t i'< � M A La ?� p ,� i * 4 � kk, ","I a t 7" —77 'r CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA M, EIVOR.DU Date; ` November 9, 1987 To: Plannin o u From: ' Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordna 'eor Subject: Continuation of Item nPil; Request for �. Consideratiun, Private Open Space Crew:t: With the change in meeting dates due to the Holiday, a ,> conflict was created for the applicant for the %ynnHaven Development. They request, the item be continued till the November 25, 1987 meeting. Thank you. ITEM !'ITIM7 A D A XTOTIA OTTO A IkKA V- A STAFF REPORT �'� j y T Q E--F 0 Z U Y Date: November 2E`, 1987 1977 To: Planning Commission From: Dava Leonard, Park Project Coordinator Subject: Request for consideration Private Open Space Credit for DR84 -22 LynnHaven (Continued from November 14, 1987.) BAC-t�anouidD: Application has been made. by D.L. Ring Associates (Exhibit A) for Lan. Bentsen's, LynnHaven Development. Under provisions of section 16.22.030 of the Cities Municipal Code, ordinance 105 -C allows credit for up to 50% against Park Development Fees (Exhibit B). This is based on consideration of Private Oven Space Development meeting certain basic recreation needs within the community. LynrlHaven is loca}-;d east of Haven Avenue, between Lyman and Highland Avenues. Built on 15.37 acres, the 316` rental condominiums yield 20.58 units per acre. The applicant requests consideration oZ 3.1 aces of private open space as identified in Exhibit "e11 in meeting the minimum three acres required under the Ordinance. Also being evaluated are three ppols, one childrecs play area, one game court area, various bu,',ldings and areas for picnicking. The application was reviewed by the Pax;c and Recreation Commission on October 20, 1987. The Commission feels the application is not in keeping with the intent of the Crdinance. First, the 3.1 acres identified include numerous areas that are pedestrial circulation corridors and not as the ordinance requires"... adaptable for Park and Recreation purpose." Second, two of the Recreation Elements., are represented, but, not functioning as proposed. The Recreation buildings are laundry rooms and rental offices. Additionally,, the site has no permanent picnicking facilities that would characteristically include barbecues, shade shelters„ tables, etc. Lacking these elements, the development does, not meet the Ordinance minimum requirements of four ;recreation elements. Based on the abc,.re, the Park and Recreation Commission feels the development dces not qualify under the Ordinance requirement. ITEM D LynzMaven Credit for Private Open Space N' P'� {ember „ 19.87 ' p' ?zROv':TtoN= The Parr and Recreation commission J recommends that the Planning Commission deny the request for credit for Private Open Space on the Lynnnaven Developm, t,. DL:bs f - i n i, \1 r Oci(MI 0 L associates a planners "19t(� t 1 l- I of Rarba-W Cucamonga The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission The Rancho Cucamonga Park Development Commission attention: Alr.L'ave Leonard.. Park Project Coordinator Community Services Department 9320 Baseline Road, P.O. Box 801r? ttaricho Cucamonga California 91730;! 1'October 1987 page 1 of 10 re: Request for - consideration, Private Open Space Credit Per Ordinance No. 105-0 Ladies and Gentlemen: Please accept this rEq gt for considerati n of Private open Space Credit, per the requirements of Ordinance 105 -C. I am making this request on behalf of Lan Bentsen interests for their development called Lynnehaven, located at Haven and Highland Avenues. Because of the significant open spaco_and installation of a significant amount of active recreation_aJ; facilities and equipment provided, we hereby request a 50% credl:-.:toward the parkland fees. Ordinance 103-0 provides that several find:.gs must be made by the Planning Commissiom nor your evaluation I have noted below each fir_irng which must be wade along with o_• a ?atement of how this requirement has been met: Requirement: (1) That Yard, court areas, setbacks, and other area.. required to be maintained by the Zoning and Building provisions of this Code shall not be included in the computatiort of private open space. Suggested Finding: The Lynnehaven development contains a total Open Space - >rea of 6.95 ac'--es. The Gross site area of 15 acres resu -ts in a total of 46.33% opera space. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 3 acres of open space to achieve credit. This project contains F.69 acres of open space not otherwisE excluded by setback lines. Within that area is 3.1 acres of qualifying open space, which is called out on the large exhibit provided. This development, therefore, meets the minimum standard set by the Council. Exhibit "A" A California Corporation ❑ Land -Planning and Design ❑ Environmental Analysis 10722 Arrow RCute, Suite 616, Rancho Cueameitga, California 91730 (714)997-7077 Park Fees Credit Request r Lan Bentsen Interests _ Page 2. ?r Requirement: (2) That the private ownersh g and maintenance of the open space is adequately prov:i.-ed for by written agreemefit. (3) Tha,`_. the use- of the private open space is restricted for park and recreational purposes by r�rcorded covenants `v which run ,with the land in favor of existing and future owners of property within the subdivision and which cannot be changed without council approval, Suggested Finding: The Lyr_ .shaven Development was submittect and approved as a condominium, As ouch the covenants, codes, and restrictions were submit`.ad to and approved by the ^owieil as a pant of the original approval. They are now in force. In addition, the State regulates what land and e..reas may be used for, along with requirements for maintenance long into the future as a part of the condominium fee structure. This guarantees not only the use, but also toe maintenance (and replacement) of community facilities. kt tuirement: (4) That the Proposed private (common) open space is reasonabl.1 adaptable for use for park and,'. recreational purposes, taking into consideration such-, factors as ,size, shape; topographyr geology, access, and locata..m of private (common) -open space. Suggested Finding: The open spaces within the Lynnehaven development are established as essentially separate areas of different character linked by walkways with an overall waterscape theme. There are no very large expanses of clear open space for use (for example) as a soccer field. The oper. spaces are more useful for passive recreational purposes. For active recreational needs there are. a significant number of recreational features and facilities normally found in public parks. These facilities are listed below: Total open Space: 6.95 .Acres Qualifying open Space: I.1 Acres S simmi -ag Pools: 3 ,each CxU -1dren Wading Pools.- 2 each Spas: 3 each Landscaped Ponds: 4 each Founta "ns: 6 each Tennis Courts: 1 each Basketball Courts: 1 each Tot mots with rxTaipment: 1 each Clubhouse: 1 each Laundry Bni.ldimq /Cabana 2 eac2t Park Fees Credit Request Lan Bentsen Intereets 'P&ga 3 :Rcguirement: (;�) That the facilities propasad for `�}a open space are iz! substantia -1 accord C—s with the provisions of they Recreatioh and Parks 8lesent of the e- otnera7l plain for the city and are approved by the Planning Coi fission. Requirement: rement: (6' , Ghat the mi.ninum open space for which credit will be o isidered is three acres and provides a miniatuut of four`` of the elements listed belcv, or -a combination of such and other recreational improvements that will Meet the specific recreation park needs of the futvtre residents of the area: Criteria List- A. children's Play Apparatus (1 required) (I provided) B. Family Barbecue picnic area (l .required) (U provided *) C. Game Court-Area (I required) (2 provided) D. Swim Pool Vl %h adjacent Deck and ancillary facilities (I required) (3 provided) E. Recreation Building (1 required) (3 provided) Total Requirements -. (4 of ldbovej (g proviLded) *The development is a condominium. Occupants are 3xpected to provide their own bar -b -que grills and supplies. The "area" is provided, but there are no permanent facilities Installed. Suggested Finding. The Recreation ;; Element -,_`of the General Plan is found primarily on pages 100 -114 of the General Plan. We believe zhe required firdink;,_abovo can:. \�sily be net. The Lynnehmven development pr.,ovi3es more than twice the facilities otherwise required to inset the minimum reimbursement credits. This development provides for ac:cive recreation needs of the residents through the provisio. of a private tennis court, a private basketbalA./ Vollyball court, three swimming pools, Three spas, two children's wading pools, a tot lot with play equipment,' mxid a _ cox .dunity building, which also includes complete clubhou_� /kitchen facilities. in addition to the active iei eational facilitiei., the developer has landscaped the site using a wager element (ponds, fountains, and streams) tr% 'Drovide for additional passive recreational pleasure of the re` ;.`dents. t �A+ r k � 's _ .. "s Lem BBUtSen i`LIE:B Qs4 5 The Following ExhAWts are Suhnutted with this tartar. I. Rendered Site pians,sjevjng the approved Landscape Plan. . Set is composed of fog (4) mounted, colored prints at a scale of 111-201. Plant materials 'arA shown at x&ture ' spread ane are color coded. Selected photographs of tha open spaces, recreational facilities and community buildings are mounted on t• ,-ase prints with symbols designating locations on th' ite plans. 2. site PlfM showialm the size, location, and areas of the. open spaces proposed for credits. On thesA drawings, the community buildings are also called put, as are the other r the,, facilities. This exhibit consists of one large p nt (fowr prints spliced together). ; 3. Rendered Details Drawings showing selected details of the pools, Mountain areaa,,_ open: spaces landscaping, and selected. facilities. Set is `�ompo fed .,off ree (3) mounted, cols +red prints. ; Photographs are m on these dravtings to C- artier illustrate these amenities. �. Floorplans and Elevations (three (3) sheets) of the three (3) community = buildings. S. Three sets Of Floerpians and Elevations of the three (3) Community Buildings constructed for this development. 6. One 8} x 11° transparency of the large p2:jnt, as requested. 7. A Detail listing of the recreational elements. f, �y V f, �y "' K Vim. � y Park Fees cr6�di.'t Request �taa Bentsen L tavo a Page 5 i n Detail listing of the recreation elements. As re(rlested these elements are set out below: 1) Main Community Bltilding[ Clul;-,�ouse J €' Area: 1,496 sq. ft. JJ f Rooms: Iitchan, Office, Keeting - ,goox, walk -in Closet /Storage, Mail Room, Restroom;;: 2) . Furniture: 1 white sectional couch 1 coffee table with square gl ss top I. white octagonal pedestal tai :.a with rot,-rd glass ,hop 1 white rectangular pedestal t able Witt 44..ass top' 2 rectangular desks 1 executive desk 3 matched desk cbaia„ set 2 matching upholsteri�d chairs 1 credenza 4 matching chairs/ seal cushions a pads 1 16« sculpturer ", 3 61 tall silk 'v,;tted p`Iants 3 2011 tall -.silk pot::ed plants Equip+ = (- ; 2 Brass ceiling Fans 2 :el ^phones whirlpool microwave oven 1 whirlpool refrigerator 1 whirlpool electric oven 1 kitchen sink. 1 sharp calculator 1 panasonic typewriter 1 lamp 1 wall sculpture 1 community wall map 1 iramect pir :uxe 1 vending machine 2) Cabana Buildin -*/ Laundry Area: ?rya squaYa feet Rooms: Storage Roorc, Restrooius (2), Laundry Aooms Furniture: 1 table Equipment: l v .;iAirig machine 5 gashing m« "nines 6 dryers f; �.. Park .Fees Credit aequast Lan Bentsen 3ntorests Pace 6 !! I 3) iaundfy, SLt -ding Area: 420 sq. ft. Rooms: lAundry Room Furniture: 1 Table Equipment: 2 venCing machines 11 was =ling machines 5 Dryers 4) Pool Equipment /Restroom Building Area: 336 sq. €a. y, Room: Pool Equipment Storage, Res,'=eums (2) Equipment: Pool 14fuipx�ment Paved rat.o /Picnic' Area, 1,186 sq. ft. (exclusive of Pool) 5) Pool Equipment/Cart Storage Area,: 300 sq.ft. R.)oms: Cart- Storage, fool Bqu= pment Equipment,. Pool Eqt pment , 6) Tot Lot Area. 40' x Gn' = 2,400 sq. ft. Fen4:,-d Perimeter: for 'child control Equipment; Timber Playsystems, Type TR/228 with Fire Swing (Mfr. Brochure reproduced attached) 7) Svennming Pooh Clubhur�a Pools (SWP 3) Swimming Pool 31' x 450 39*y450 gallon cap. Spa Poul 9' dig:. 1,244 gallo i cap. Pool Furniture., 8 Pool /Picnic Tables 8 Umbrellas 32 chairs for Tables 15 lounge chairs 3 planters Tennis Court Pool (aw 1) swimming Pool 41' �,, 45' 23,065 gallon cap. Family Area Pools: (S UT 2) swimming Pool 241 x 321 14,963 gallon cap. Toddler Wading Pool '0' x 10" -' 151 gallon cape Baby Poop. 10' x 10. 151 gallon cap. 8. Tennis Court Regulation Doubles Size Teiu4is Cour Perimeter Fenoinrr Night Lighting F ,� iZ, 777M Ww P ark- Bees "C�i$ Iter�t Ott Lan Hents•en 'E3YE}'ss •; Page t , 9. Basketball Court /Volkybalt Court Paved 301 x 60> Two (2) regulation height bask-atball backstops & hoops ' 10. Fountains A Total of Six (6) fountains have been installed .. 11. Ponds A Total of four, (4) ponds have been eoristructed. Pond 1 (PHD 1) 201 x 34 Fond 2 (PND 2) 107' x °7 -14' (varies) with rapids Pond 3 (PND 3) 109' x 10-33$ (varies) with rapids &:;fountain Pond 4 (PHD 4) 31'' x 16' with three (3) fountains 12. Open Space Areasll Area: g of Total: f Total Site Space: 15.00 acres 100% Total Open Space; 6.95 acres 46.33% - Qualifying Open space,. 3.1 acres "20.66-1 The developer }:as worked hard to aevR *.op an exemplary residential area with above average recreational and open space facilities. This extra effort has cast a documented "' total of $901,992.51 for the landscaping and *=^creational facilities. Therefore, on behalf of Lan Bentsen Interest:, I am respectfully zequesting your consideration' and approval of a .request Zor 50$ credit 02 tte_,park fzes for this Project. Few, if any, other develcj�aents wit-Wn the city will meet the;, level of, facilities. found her:. This development does not merely meat the City's recreation minimums. The development exceeds them significantly. For this reason I believe the 50% credit shcul -. be granted tc this applicant. . �r1cc "Pectfu ' y it. d, Donald G. :.i President ::harter il'ember. erican Inctitutc of certifi °d Pacners chaste; Member. American ,.Planning Ascociatio s Assocl::e Afembvr. American "Institute of Architects 16.32.J10--16.32.020' A. The subdivision as shown on the tentative tract map has the potential o; —two hundred dwelling units -fir more if developed to the maximum capacity shown on the adopted general plan or contains -one hundred acres or morep anj, B. The council has previously found that transit services are, or will within a reasonable time be available to such subdivision. (Ord. 28 -B 51.608, 1981). Chapter 16.32 PARK AND R� CREATIONAI,, ji V I� Sections: 16.32.010 Intent and general provisions. 16.32.020 Requirements. 16.32.030, Procedure. 16,32.040 Exemptions. 36.32.010 Intent and general provisions. The intent of this chapter is to provide for the development of park and recreational facilities through subdivsicn regl_.lations,n an area where thn need for residential use, shall, as a con- dition to the approval of a tentative map, - el map, planned comminiity, land development or real estate elopment, dedi- cate 'lands or pay sees in lieu thereof, or a combination of both, for neighborhood and community park of recreational p,rposes. Land to satisfy dedication requirements shall to conveyed to the city at the time of redlydatioz of the final map or parcel map. in lieu fens shall se paid to the city prior to '.he issuance of building permits. (Ord. 105 -B 51, 1982: OrA.. 105 51, 1980).. 16.32.020 Aecruirenents. Land or fee_ required under this section shall be conveyed or paid directly t�. the city. _ The city in accepting such lard or funds shall develop tle l &nd or use the funds as pruvided in this section: A. Use of Land and Fees. The land, fees, or combin�_Aon thereof are to be used only for thc: purpose of providing park o: recreational facilities which will, reasonably serve or benefit future residents of such subdivision. B. Establishment and Development Time. Any fees collected under this chapter shall be committed within five years after the payment of such fees or the issuar:re of ?wild- permits on one -b a-If of the lots created by the sF6bdlvision, whichever o-curs later. If such fees are not commit #ed, they shall be diEtributed and paid to the then record owners of the subdivision is the same proportion that the size or their lot bears to the total area of all lots within the subdivision. (Rancho Cucamonga 5/83) 246 -1E Eshibit ��8� .M,A' t. C. .Land Disposition. in the event thr,t ortunities \ \\ \j fox better (_%Wzeation facilities than those`• :11?rov da& by the dedication materialize, the land so dedic ated may h•Wc%o2d with the pro6eeds the3nfrom being used for suitable park and recreation's acilities -which sarve,,the neighborhood`''s which that subdivision*, is located_ 1.r�; D. ons;y the payment of fees shall, be required in sub- divisions, of less than fifty lots unless agreed otherwise k-- the ciW szouncil and the sub{ i•vider. E. Et lord ;for Dedicatibn. The amount of land to be dedicated or the fees to be paid shall bear a reasonable relationship to the use of benefits of the paik and recreation facilities by the fu -:ire residents ot'the subdicisionr the ei�y council establishes a ratio of.five park acres t6''J -n3 thousand population, in accordance .with the adopted Park and kecreation Blement of the city's 'general plan. R. Amount of Park Fees Required. Whrn the _quix nts '' of this code are complied with on the basis of providxag park fees, t'ie minimum amount of fees to be paid shall be computed by using the following fofAula- FORMULA Z NSP " D) msnisun f'ee �_ IQ = c utMex of t�,roposed d"lliag units. S = plan ed park acreagn, per 1, OOt;.,, population. P = population per dwelling unit on a scale and density set by the, . responsible public Agency, L = fair market value of parkland per acre it represented by the land being subdivided. D = average cost per acre t .3avelog park as determined by the public agency,. G. Amourt of Land Required. ithe. ever t.e requirements of i-;k*s section are complied with 6n the basis of providing park land, the rr-inimum amount of land required shall be the amount which could be purchased with'the fees computed in - subsection F of this section. - H. Park and Recreational Use Land Fair Market Value. The fair market value shall be -d termined at the'time of recordation of the parcel map err final map in accordance with the following criteria: 1. The fair ,market value as .`" �termined by the c:it council; or, 2. If the subdivider objects to' such evaluation he may, at his own expense, ob,ain� Win. appraisal of the ,property by a qualified real e:.tate SSfiz�iSsr from the general area approved by the city, whit -0 :, cpraisal may., be accepted;by the city council if found ra;sd.Aable. I. combination of Park Land and Fees Required. When a combination of land dedication and in -lieu fees are 246 -19 (Rancho Cucamonga 5/$3) 16.`.sl C30 l reauired as a'`=ndition of approval, the fai _- market value 2f the. lane,, to be:ied4�.,ced, as detprmi.neO,, pursuant to subsection ,L of this :is section, and ta ; ;An -lieu fees, as comb wed under subsection F of this section, shall bi of an equal =value to provision of subsection F of/ thMs, s`Ar:tion applied to the entire subdivision or p ikaned lcommunity. J. • Notwithstanding any �thc7 ��ovisions in this chapter to the contrary, fo ;;,*oA tine maps and parcel maps approved or cond%tior.k ily ail" i v�>) alts: December 31, 1992, the amount of land de,dioa- e i or • fees paid shalt' be ba -d upon the u residential density, which sh &ll be determi? ;lets on the basis of the approved or conditiongZly approvad tentative map or pa-,,iel map and the average'household size and shall be the p; porrionate amount necessary to provide three acres of park area per one thousaAd Petsonz residing within such subdi- vision. For the purposes of applyinq the formula found 'in subsection ,77 of this sec#on to such subdivisions, S equals three and 3:' shall be the ,f axage size of each riass of house- ,, within such subdi.t*isir; n' of azy such subdivision con- hold more than one class -of household, a separate coidpu- •cation using the formula in subsection F of this sec:ti.on shall be made for each class of :household wlttAn such svii- division and the minimam iee -ror the separate calw4latiotis shall be added together to determine the;,minimum fee for the subdivision as a whole for the purpose ot� determining dedl— cation requirements. (Ord. 105-B $2, 1982; Ord. 145 S2, i9eD) . f� 16.32.030 Procedure. The requ: cements ot'this chapter snail be met concurrent to tits approval of the final, parcel map, final subdivision map, or the planned commur.ity'',� or prior to issuance of building permits, by the provision of park land in whole or in part, the payment of a park fee. or by a combination of both as required by the city coun::il,: A. City Option., ;t the time of tiling tentatii's tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, ti +e zit shall determine whether deli gation)�of property for pail- ang? , recreational purposes Or in• lieu��,of fees are necesstiz-y. If the city desires dedication, the area shall be designaad on the tentative tract map wher, submitt :try B. Action of City: At the time Xif the tentative tract map approval, the plannan) commission shat. deter :ne Gs part of such app: «val, w'^;ether to require'. 'u, dedication'of land within the subdiv^isi:tu, payment of a fee, in lieu' thereof, or a combination of both. C. Prerequisites for approval of Final Map. Where dedication is offered and accepto d it shah be accomplished in accordance with the provision #) of the Subdivision riap Act. Where "fees ore required tie saute shall be depositEd with the city prior to the issuance of buildinq permits. . G1 (Rancho Cucamonga 5/93) 246 -20 = ti 4. IP.% :i 16,.32.030 D. determination. The planning commission ;3h�3i de- termine wfietherIto require Land dedication, requirb paymn�it of a, fee in lieu :hereof, or a c ? glAriation., of both, iiy con- siaeration of the followiIng 1. ('Redreational element. of use-,general plan; and 2. Topography, glagy, access and location of land in the subdivision available for dedication.; and 3. Size and- shape'of the subdivision and land_ available for subdivision. E. Park and Recreational Use Land -- Credit £,or, Private Open Space. Where private open space for park,,r, :l recrea- tiona�rposes is in .r F provided a proposed subdi lion, avid such space is to be privately owned and makrtaird "by the future residents of the subdivision, subh areas J y be credited against not more 4 fiftly percent of the require - ment of dedication's and development for park and. recreation purposes, as set orth in this see•tia, or the payment of fees.in, lieu then R, as set forth herein�'provided the plarV (ing commlmissi.on`Jfinds ^.t is in the pcblic inter st to do so, "d that the, fdtlowiag standards are met;` w That yards, court zreas, setback: and other open areas required to be maint'ined.by the zoni� q and building provi sior s of the this code snap not be imi �.l1zded in the computation of such private open space; and ?. wilat the private ownershi;, anal maintenance of the ca.L space is adequately prcvided -for by written agree- + uent;; and 3. That the use of the private open space is re- stricted for park and recreational purposes by rc• :)rded covenants which run with the, land in favor of the existing " and future owners of property within the subdivision ar.d which cannot be defeated or eliminated without the consenr if the council; and 4. That the proposed private open space is -rga- sonabl,y adaptable for use for park and recreationa+ pur- poses, taking into cwsideration such factors &s sLze, shape, topography, Geology, access and location of the pri- vate open space land; and 5. That faciliti.as, proposed for the open: space are in substantial accordance with the provisions of the rec- reation and parks element of the general plan for t'-he city and are approved by the planning commission; and 6. That the minimnun open space for which *redit w3!! ,be considered is three acres and provides a minimums of _z, of the elements listed below, a* a combination of such, and other recreational improvements chat will meet the,spe- ciZic recreation park needs of the Luture residents o the arei: Criteria List. a. Children's play apparatus; b. Family barbecue picnic area; C. ,Game court area; f 246 -20a (Rap :hA t�ucam gagar,. i __ ° C' c - l&. 32.040 d. Swim pool wirh adjacent deck and ancillary facilities; e. Recreation building. The suadi.vider requesting considerat.:on for pri- vate open space credit shall, as part of the submittal fil- ing, include: , i. wI -itten request for such consiaeratiun by the planning co—Assion and ii: rJubmit-, detailed ,.t�lans and specifications for areas and inrrovements within such proposed private open space... The planning commission shall, as an element of the review for private'bpen space credit, solicit comments and recommendations from the part development �3mmission:-osi_ all -tch applications. F. Credit for Private Open Space -- Planned GGrmaunities. Where private open space for park and recreational purposes is provided in a planned community and portions of or all such space is`to be privately owned and maintained by the future residents of the planned community or publicly dedi cated and maintained by a special assessment district,, cred- it against the requireme<t c:f dedication for park and i{ c- reational purposes, as set forth su,section: 16.32.020G ,,,mall be determined through the adoption Qf the planned commuririLj�a text; prc^rided, however, that the pack standard for the, ", planned community is the same as for any other.developr} bat _. and that the planning commission; `finds it is i:i the ub'iic p g p . interest to di so, and that the standards for privatL f:, n i space, as set forth in Section 16.32.0308, are met. 1 G. Planned developments and real es-ate developments as defined in Sections .11003 and 11003.1, respectively, of the Business and Profestions Code, shall be eligible tc re- ceive a credit, in an amount determined by resolution of the city council, against the amount of land required to be dedicated, or the amount of the fee imposed,-,pursr to this chapter, for the value of pr gate open space within the development which is usable for activa recreational uses. This nubsect xn shall app,y only to planned developments and real estate developments for which tenative maps or parcel maps are approved or conditionally approved after ,.ecember 31, 1982. The cre.,it allowable pursuant ti� this subsection shall, if applied fclq, be in lieti of any ocher credit allow - abla under other pr,�,isions of this chaptez. ,ford. 105 -B §3, 1982; Ord.. 105 -A S1, 1584; Ord. AS $3, 1Sja), 16.31.040 Exemptions. The provisions of this chapter do not ,apply to commercial or industrial subdi--tision ; nor do they :apply to co,idominium proje<ats which consist of the subdivisi n of atirspace in an existing apartment building which is more than five years old when no new dwelling units are added, (Ord. 1055 S4, 193O). A (Rancho Cucamonga 246 -20b 34/84) _ 1 .,....._.......«�... �fu=': 4E]:'1CN ...re.`t:: =_ :XT¢'kSlGa +M....... _ 'CHILDRIENS TOT LOT s' a _ FAMILY POOL AREA �_ — --�" .—•� �.. �`'f -:ter GLOBVIOUSE POOL �'' " A i N �� y, ,�;yr t `•r TENNIS COURT & POOL s .:�• 4 \ .•fi saw ��'V�`��� ~r ~i. 1 ^OUR7 AREA X. `.. :.t �K�i•— '�.��..� oaf y. { ,�r.� }gtII..�. �. .....rT+..r� —n ^ � rte-• .... �. „'+- ••- +--.r- __�. ' !- �yL��. +�..- AREAS rt OPEN SPACE .CL SIDERATION' REVr)1TION ELEMENTS ����s�"Z.� C. tZ+%i.rANiCNGA, C 3 {�j Exhibit "V Iry " • J�J