No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/05/25 - Agenda Packet07Q1 -02 5 5- PC Agenda 1-of 4 h o oc RA CCCAIVjaNU&-- ;'rhe- fakirwing items are public hiartrids in ww6h ac�ncernai��s� 1nav voice 'their. opiniohI ojr,, related project. Please mvsam* to,be romlaprrireci #►}' th Owirman € addrass the Commission.by ��•. ing firmdiviciva � rojecsiictm opinians shall be limmWed-to 5 � ,znu � M t�i<�iFEEPi�AJ ESS4YSPIfi . AND C�Eb3BItAI, MEPDhf FMST CITY P PEItTI�' - An a, ZRndinw.t to tie C�iroas. a0 eament,o * 1 Geimeral Piun, tO < videa sherry Averos 'Fro ` Emmmnmit ' Avenue- (24th strreet) to i in #erstate i5 froms�sa°coiieet�mr to a Oeonday artarisl With an, 08? right- cry %wmy r.. Cj"V etl%1 and amend (�S n7lMpra111 A /�y�yp matte)} #a un7 88' CtiJ'�I tion. (21 Amend 4he +i't+Rate.Z` /r, li4{1 of Ttailslaf � `` n s the Gensra2 Piste ;ka rel9cute ,Rile tra#I azi #hie �u � lido oaf emit � t -�, �ivenmre:ta the norfil� at_ Summit AeeamCe clang the essterlg L�i#y 11155 E. - #UIIiOPa 2F TTA1r ice" Ei53142EN'E' A1�ti) :E`itii€t1IIDA '`r , iF%� O 1,; LAPI •A L�PIDi IIt�T CITX'PIiC3PERTfE.S �An ' taameadiaent=ta`iiae Et eta Piatm ta�widen �� A�Zamnme- ,� from 3umn emit Aventine :t 4tlm Street) .710 §mtet,§tate S from a collector to a• sacondW arterial .with any fil �ij hi�t�: �� road � met" and Vie` V Immit AVenU to ,8A 8$�trof -vtay road a r` section.' the Commwflty Trans Map of tile. Etlwsnda Specific )an k m�lIaeat,�s the traiF on the south side at Summit f Avermue #�k time c�L'r` :.f Summit Avenue aloW .the easterly City � ' grtwmtdrt�x'! it ' � ;', '�;. � , � • ` ,:'f L I MEN ASSESSMENT 'AND f3E1�tERAL #L$ilY �i AMENDlk ENT88�, A r i7 - A request to araen�3 I" d= 13ieenent of tY +general, fan from i4�dium ti Rasiden i to { ci Ntedivam "Residential on rax na tali` i2e26 acres of ;�+Bmmd, li� #cal ltorth ?. d aY�, �ommth GI—Eamon Ave ue ;tenaio smmQ tv, a Deer C reek C'rheminel4, t1PPi. 2tl7 ' 271 4 (6 ,rt %srm3 41(lsortloO and 42. r o CI. EPTYill01 l4fEN � L ASSESSMENfi AND DEViLGPMENT D -AMENDMENT WH7 I yG ttGfiiOK b; A ;, tequest : to aemend a Development ;District Desigrmafloin - of Nledlummm jltesidential to Low-Medium Residential as approximately`` 42.28 aq es, tooated at. the horth side of Mghjan-4 Avcmituec south? of Lem' I Avenue extinsion and west of 'Deep Greek Cl�tmnel, - lPPtz 2 XI-; %portion, 41(porxion), and 4 -4. I% EPiViitta lftEPY AL ASSESSMENT � AND'• `C1t?Al,°6�fTC3 USE k . J MM) GER ER cl r B - �rlm$ r .G ti c, veI' kpent rr1 ,Z+a cat.jay care iaeiiityr can .$eu of�lh#rithin, the Low Densit i esidential Disfrm%t, located at the earner of Ease Lf.� and a lUrnar. Avenue AM t. to • • .) r 3 SbrMOATiNTAL ASS98 T N A ' TiU bLS TLl-.-i; -A 4 MW 11� U �DREN I � N Ir R sa viswn a 1. 8 .acts o Sand "into 2.pareeis, -In ttxc d Aesidential Dlstrl�t - �t''` units par we iao*tod t the swthwest corm of BQ Line, lioad tati -,Bert LifiL t3idMEN�T'AL ASSENSUEN T �� VA S i R 8744 - LEN K r quot is reduoe the mir rnum , ate, nom IST feet kt3 146.6 to 5 tats in cav�juraetiah �ritit de�€s lopmeht of R8 ate family iota aid 17_.29 ae W! , we Vers Low Reoldential liistrAt (I V than 2 dwellL iY Eta F iaem), Ioostod tt e #eU sw of . ethyst s e4 no of vie-� Streot,� K. ;t1$OEiMI31TAL AiEiSSA'NiT' 1"l7C .,T BI 13674 ' E AgEN7 T - resi Mist tbc?i as a 2".� "sf ie . on ga -Of f tp >� Ptak iii r lC denii i , Dbtrlo {ice VISA 2 dw6iiiT+ un # �' r re;f r tat a fire - U aids at Ametri str et .na of Va]Ee1r Via 1061= ? � Ezvr#t!?rIFAiI'i t:#JX�rr -L °QSS PERUM' 11 The request t t establishe, bui � eantr 4 � ffieci7i�ec .wf 2,�X squ w* feet Within an triuw-ten xi loustriai eenuk in the Genegey L-idustr i7 triat € srae A) .*' toeateO at 90ST'Am.w Routo -:APX, N. lUI0I2IR AfiiiiN 1'f7 CYC3nI of(AFs U811 PE RIM 3A -I3 MAURY. ' A rc g uest ro aL�r . ext�zissia for tR --�.. a four #z' aeetsrs': a site eoiaieining in existing 10,0 f4eiltlty .an 14 60re of land in the; area 3), lmatett'at 8610 Helms Avanuo - n 2-14. 01IMPUTAL E A ,,_EN ASa_fT� Ai v NfE3dAI F� `-'LAU v FfF Pii #3 - a, * t�R iiAw F AR4Q G ,, 19mwoment to the "Land use Inement or ailbpailfg Paz�els withht the 14atokia d6mhtut3ity Plan sue$ from a e� umts per . aore3 to Lots f, -4 units Saar ecru Ai?i3x 27.11.7 frame ediura (8-14 �e4tili per eore� to gre3 APk i§ 791 -i, . dei� 4i Low iTediB ts ! , 49, 5li; from iiurs { -I4 z1slit is p+ 1ecli�+ttm� iS High (1444 �we' ng units per Vii$ Nis 22 S rJ" 253 43; from U"um (8-14 &N units Baer ro) to Saar L , - Med€um (4.4, dviejift units per acre) ' :X27 -1, i eigiiba a Cammoroiai t1t 1 ditittl ltefattieFi� iat 4 eY'it ts racro3-� ;c --- CITY" ov R.�I'CHO MC�fSJ�RtExA, =_ ISM Y EPCfRT ' DATE; 8� 1988C ,�. TG Chairman and M;Aers of the Pia r .Commission Buller, City Rlanner _ BY. Narcy Fong - 10sociate Planner ' SUBJECT: EN"SIRONFl 11AL ASSESSKERT AR !lEdEL�'�PMENT REVIEW S$ - 3 'd „ enarr n istrial build�ngs ling '�3Q,S 4 ,, quaff 'C,37 feet on acres qe Tand — thih & approved Master Plan,'in the IndustriO Park •District barea 6) 1ocp'Nd at the northwest corner "of J,lca AYenue and Berrtlejr street - I+F : 210 = 481-19 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: -.. A. . r' Action Req;zested: Issuance 6f .`a negative Declaration B. SuMraund n Lane +Use and Z�,PI ; ' ., a - scan ntus '�'a —rk i�lstric.. ° , r�aT- South - vaclttt; Industrial,,Pa�istrict £Sutiarea 6 and AMU haven Overjay Districh East, - VacanV- W'4-•: al 0 cs; General Industrial District ' t "rea 11`). West - Office bUildifng,_ cant, Industrial Park` District: 4Subaea 6, Navenaverlay Distrioi; C. General Plak Des i nations: � J) ro eG e - n us r ai Parkk. North -' Industrial Park and Haven Overly uistrict South - Industrial :Park and ffavere,Orerlay,District East - General Industrial West - Industrial. Par; and iaven Overlay, district D. Site Characteristics: The site is Vacant and covered with $ an one v n,eya3 and native vegetation. N$tvral, ground slopes gently southward, about 3 percen +a gradient. E. Parking Ca7cuxations: - Number of t ser of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces Of Use Footage Ratio Hegalred Provided. Office Blogs 1 and 2 22830 1X250, 91•. 91 Muiti4enant Bldgs 3 -6 665544 IJ40D 167 186 It j R y µ 1.17M A :. f � r a PLANNING C, ISSION STF REPORT � j a� RE`s DR 88 -t3 _, REITER > may 26, 1 g 0 t �� , - Y _ A. 0aneral. i'he applita"i is ^requesting tj1n Environmental W-PRsment "for the construction of two offfcei and four multi- tenant industrial the, totaling,89,37§ =,4uare` feet. *Elpon approval of a ilegative Declaration, the G0zy /,'planner will grant approval of the project based ukon the �ii6 ended conditions of approval from the Design and teOrticai� P. view. Comeittees. B. _ Design Review Co�aitteer° `The Design Re +view Committee ��ictiiel, '�ol'scoy 'CTemanl ,XevWed this Ai "o3�''t on May 1986. and recommended approval.with the follovAng conditions. 1. Additional landscaping'and pedestrian amoities fr with 'benches and tables, should be provided to'the area between Buildings 3 and 4 and W -tween '3 Buildings 3 and 8 #; 2. Additional' landscaping shouji; be provided`�along:, r. � the building frontages. ` 3. AddiOonal',, planter fingei should provided'5 along a roW of parking spaa;es between 'ildings 8, { and 5. 4 The main plaza ' should iq expanded by eliminating save parking spaces~ The limited mbar of pinking spaces its Avant of the-, plaza ahould, only be striped for handicapped and guest narking, The handicapped .parking spaces shoulQ have the same plaza t`wtura tnat�enl- , C. Technical Review Comittee. Staff has completed the Environmental CneCK11St ind WS 4eteffln ed that no significant adverse impacts would ,occur as a raseot of this pro Ac ? Further,, a Negative ..Declaration has been rued for the a4roved hater Plan con Jxptember 11, 1985. M. C0*01DATION: Staff,, recommends issuance of a Wgative eclaration or the Development Review 88 -13. - Res ally subm tted, /Brad 4 City'Bia erg 8B.NF:Js y NS lt. u i�t x % T OM "STVT REPO ,4T may 26 198 ,Page � ! a�4tta�i ratsi Exhibit "A" "B" - Site f 111zation Moo DhibAt, E'xhIRt OCO - =Approved; ;ter P76 for Utz Q - Detailed Site Plan for Phas6 It Wibi't "0" - Conceptual Grading Pla% .. tonceptu>al LaniftoiPe Plan f it `< Em bit "P", ,r'Phase - 'Large, Plaza Area4` _ Tw hit pie 1 n l 'j I 1 II 4F tw r Ua» ear rj 13 � � aRrrora� aAND U82 MAN THE GATEWAY "�'�C1�i •..rte �O'°'O^"+� ,.a� ,���_. ..LOLRaLR .WIN. ,•` ( - 1 .. t }5 • .yrte} �RIl4+a1 •t /1 R -. ;. , ' JKiwe"o C&CAStoxoU. camRoattta Ara w[u•auru �[0erwY�a� ae LL[RK '[ G 1Pa /FR 11s LNOt1LTi: PIUIdiM[L� •�•Y•�• i "�� L�GS4RR [d<M!eWIRR ORTH Cln OF 17311:L 'Y RANCHO tJ TM r r 1 �- n.tw.. nw>+a •. Jovt ar j. 7`7 jr I -Lufl CaKiYf �J � y <.jp }r r +�R <gJ�JiCIiW ��.\ �•\ TT ~'P • j��.7. r�E{. _ t aeeesae_y�'etaiatrta Me �^ _ .var.as.. arw , ue*Ja+.a o'E'cwidwi.<r . g1•s+w.<OGq..r t� RNkw crwYMM.. <.< wea ♦ts<. Y1 CI' Op R, W-,CHO CUCAMONGA 'gram ITEM. PLANNING DIVISION � R � SCALE n _ y k s py— f6N1F/!rf f NP1SNip Ail I vi it it L+,. r rr "� ! ��. •: "�! if { - + , �A��,j� --.- tea. jt OL KMTPMEM , ;— Mme.. � some NQRTH - -- _ -- w.euuma�w wue F - `i ter+ "�+�rY�P v.+wrwrYetivw.l 9� `- RANCHO ' 'i1F IMF i PINING DIVISION�� j jEum:.�.�����: . Lai te a � r- 'IP �] Lt 1-+ i IF �. Lai te a � r- 'IP �] IF �. X11 1� rJ ` riT r t� DATE: 4+ i! TO: Chafroan nwMemhori at the Pla jifig �� fssiar;v t TROY: Brad Bulte_ ,,City Planner ° BY: CtAdy ??yrris, Assistant Planner SUBJECT" , DESIGN REVIER EOP - "�El ATUE MACT Ii 6 - 1 ESl,4 VENTURE DE�QPRE'R'i i t i` 15 'I gn " Rev"i s of uIlding e ova° ons an a,s "detailed site plan for pty,.viously aPproved slue race con astir of 31 single' family lotx :5n 7 res d land in the L Density :Resi`dential ,a Dis :ts1? delving units perre', l,acated:' the \1 z, nart6eaccrner o - Heian Avenue surf lryorr Set APKs 208 -111 - . 1. PROJECT AND SITE iE 0IFIPTIOq_.I A. Tuition Requested: Appr*al of.:builAing elevations and ,plat tans. B :� Project Density " a4 dwelMn a Cs per acre, C Surrounar„ Lauri Use gnat 2o}sin )j C. r°y IKes N n L vensty ResicTedtie"! f24 ( lying ?,untit's per acres } Sbuth - Existi;rq 5t gg1Ee Pa�tily Residential, Law Density Residential (lrk4 suing units per acre) East ,Existing Sfirg° Family Residential, Low Density Restdonfat C' 4 dwelling snits trey acres West" Existing Sin ` e Family Residential, Low Density Res! ential -4 dwelling -units lilr ac-rej D. 'General Plan Desi "at l si, ro ec ti (l��rk Designation Worth - Low S. lesidentfal t2 -4 dwelling units per acre? ` South - Low Densit lessdential (2 -4 dwelling units pets acre) East - Low Dent, ftsidential €24 dwelling units per Atrex r . West - Low Dens ;uslvential t2- 4'dlling units per sere! 4 E. Site 6hracteristi the proposed .site f�is din mill) i su v s oa c s `an aubrfia4te slope of` 3 'percent from �J narikP to south. iactng .homes in;, the iaiiediate, area are j approximately-15 'fie f ,;old and are Oner al ly one" story to othe r'lrth and east, , Jt story to, the sooto' and are Orimtrily Constructed with' c ositit��,,,gb ("iyles, Stti co and rtatsd Bfdiitg :., " All _ -cf . T90 COW ISSION STAFF REPORT ° '0i ., FOR TT iW$ a WEST VENTURE OV ELOPMENT Shay 25, 1989 :. Page 2 1� - Ile & Back round: The subdivision �$sign'and grading for the 37'16ts' were prey ouJy approved by tine Planning Comrsission on June iD,' 1987.. An appeal Of 14-A Conditions of; Approval was filed•iay the applicant;, "regardin4 pregerOation - of the Magnolia tree, undergrounding of 14171 ties"And f-pad heights adjacent to Hellman .: Avenues Which was,�hoard by' the City Counci; on September 16, 1,87 and the condi,'Ubns generally'upheid. S. General: The appTicant'is proposing two floor plans, one.one- s ar�.-and one twa -sV)ry which range in size from 2,173 square feet to 2,648 r�guart feet. Each floor plan has a to'tal.of' four" . elevations, of h` ici,�� tiro have 3 -car garages and two have 2 -car •,J� _ t 9arage5. �; , L C. Design Review Covoittee� On Aprii a, 1988 and May rr, 1988 the : sign Review-, Cowittee .Mroitll 4 Chitiea, ffierick) revilewed the project and recortamnded a9,proval fir�fct to' the follft6g, 1, Additional Vaxfiation +sfiould b2 _ provided 'its the front' ' setback of the honks along Westy -'Drags, patriot Place, � and American Drive by incrosli 4,, the setback for Lots 17, 23, $1, and 32.' 'ifs iWJ. cant'has comiplied mtith eels condition as renected id the rievis�( Site Pl; (gee ..MiiYA't �6iR'' • C; 2. tine. flood rail 4"ocid be 008ted-at t1od" sac -of wslk and bec II . constructed of'a slur stone material. The perimeter tract; l wall adjacent to Hellman 'Avenue ` should be stucco coated with slump stone pilasters and, capped..' The flood wall should be constructed as a level wall,.' with steps to follow natural grade, rater than parallel to the sidewalk with the courses in,�,m-block running parallel to those in the ,K block pilasters S." =tee perimeter wall. 3.. An enhanced landscaped ;treatment should be provided a�'�ent to the wall inset�s'avr��llman Avenue. This o teats ert inclsde ode ratiwe antors,oiccen� trees slid /or additional shrubs.-OiL= ..` � 4, Permanent vine --Iopv should be Provided on the tract wall adjacent to. TieTlsman Avenue,, atsd `should accosm�sdate future growth. 5. Decorative corner sida yard walls, consistent with the'wa`li treatment on. Hellman Avenue, should be provided adjacent to Lots 3, 4, •8, 29, O, 34 37. _{ and T* applica as :added= these silo. a�I sS�ostld � ' •. pylaant.,.'"Mievper,ul s �rev�ifsweld - ; kept are`. least 5 feet from ?rite hack, iii the wok. r - {� 01AMWNG C ISS16ii STAFF REPMl „�y2,T X476 - WEST Ytf[rR OEYEit3Phfk"tdC 1 19 A Page S 6'. ihe,ex €sting block -W&17­a(Jjiiaent't*1 the north property din should be repair;,] ^+here necessary. 7. All side anr4, rear elevations of the two- story huaet, should -i have an enhanced architectural treatment with „particular attention Paid 10- those' Units,'which back onto 1*11aan Avenue. *lir t his revised the side" and re8tr -7 elevations for t story eler- ttioes (EMbit M as ` 8. For all, ffel toW4,veneers a natural river ruck should be used rather 1,galn a manufactured stone. For other types of stone, manufac red veneers.-were found acceptable+ of the cultured stone' veneers, the Comittes found the '-Brown Cobblefie'ld e,, a Francisco, or a mix of the San Franc €szo and Grey Gebblefield, and "tire Texas Creme CoO e V eTd acceptuole4 " ° 9. The use° ei' the ,cape cod blue mauve color schemes should � be used on the projectts, interior. and not on clots fronting on to Tryon. Oi uradins CmVinittee: The } project twas revi%ed and appro -,ed by the araaapg aWxsee on April S, 19881 w� 111. FACTS FOR FINDING91 this project is consistent the Devel,opment Code and he General P1 ject ;ar€11 not be \, detr €rental to the adjacent, nr�' erne yause aignifit be qri ronrenw. a.I.:i`..-v �.. ws = ....•. .-� apas8d usa,dnd $i.e :p1aq_ together wish the.. raco rt tio,?!s oaf Approval: Are in , compliance with tiro applicab sions�of the Meve'to*nt ` odeU j and City standards. T-►. R GOMMEN ATION: Staff 'r C�enes that rthe Planning 'CtN� inion a pt^���rt :a <"1es#grr rertiew of uilding-elevat €ons and plot Plans fur 5r Mats though thdep ion of the attached izesolution, and C idi'tbns of Approya; ° Re . ul r /City lan er Bg4tliS,75 i) Attachments: Exhibit 1 1A4 Site Utilixat €oa Map Exhibit "S "- - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C "- Grading Plan Am. Exhibit "Oa Landscape liars! ° Exhibit - "E" - Ell, Ione.. Exhibit "F" i=togr A)ans, t - : ZI cS „t Rit r AOL lw a9 N. Pee r« el ,�i,vo•au t^a�-{! ! ' »•� t� t 7 l �i 4 It Ilw... � Jw,ca�i."eL•�r � -� ���� '. �.. i I �. '.:z'� =i ' 6�r • � j ' K{� ° µ •" `I � �—.. ai • � 4 as t 1 F T j - -�_ -� ( i �iY ���� 1111•n JTL t -WORTR z' CI' O J RANCHO CUCAMONGA PL&NNING. DIVISION rl THlCRn tNT RI011 <TYrR +zrrmu - T17! @6L t y,/4�. FkReooO � wrknt a- � €C110x T__„�„�Ori�Tk {Er NORTH �vfl� erenek to assn r C[k1iYVl P� (dlrff OF r :� RM, CHO CUCMOFIGA t-A!4& i i �j111 nr aiN.tTl f'Nfr�t,� WpstCCNti I ��Tr Ll �T tilW 'L- `� I - 3" r�s ,I i� - �'a4 vsw�is .• 1 agst=xeNT /�CAmr -SE F/ElL LIAN 6' fLCe° AM 4VE. arrsr �"/ i tilts Ea1;1! ,s II q�Gacrcuoc/twACC r,cL4HPlC%D/id an+vMa lea ! 1� roKn+ t ` AkCITY RANCHO 31NlIL[ FAMLY p[llonc[ .�' �% r �� car p _ ;` "�,�• i `� . I f `M MR > J,I ,.�..M.t: �9rM1 �n ?� {ice C 1 } I 1� 7 •�_.. � � 1�2, Cam' � ��� �� �� ++. _� L . � �� �� �1.'�w� � ✓� ��' J ,,r I�r �wn�iaril+sa_w 1 i ° +,', r ,.. t"'S�°i -. � r+.+ �- - f�_�"3.:_��r^ �(� •I� `;� zS ' y[ ....010 g """".� j< ft: y� ^Z._ i `o �'�'�.l�r't°` � S't^�A� }":. f '� }1SA'!`n,r �•. �,., ,` '� ,2if \ `�� 9." •`..;�t let. Iff _? V� ,iE?' .� ' "4� 1 -•� #..._..-�' t""'tiT Y% } l} �"� i .l ��% t j . 1' _ it • Lam` r 4 Lx i r_J - r-._„� 7 ;� w ... �t of �•� °_f r *,.�Y' «.,1 1 � M, J. I r 1 ff t ''7Y rnv . �.KYIA.1 Nn/Ittylt .rte �� J�f•� tai •er aNOM Jyy .. NORTH Ktf�•IW,Iti. :&YU (YN1ob1I� �W �R1�1�6� H 3ii1� AMPIw I fl4vQONff. i� CffY OF ���o� [l m f, t it t c Bill. r PITY Off' i `Mt D 1f i I`i/M!'• n. AVR1a r�FZ � �R�Rf9iR � �! l 117, r : � x 1 A . $ P fw CITY OF ITEM: PL03NING DlrST()X AW 7a�Aw. Alftk .4 wil �p,Ai ki We CITY OF 4:%'ANCHO w�rrsy �.t� 1 M , t.�..�_I�•r. _ :�r�`.fJ,< �•J ♦tr.. •N�� ~�. ire �� _.1 1 t�.r- �•'�w��.er � j " �awM•L `�' a �w '� ��w. e :`� CUCAMONGA Inn& WING wo IL amae Witt • � r i " t� iii � ` ,,� K• �� • r � 61 j CITY O RANO ,HO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DII SION ExHlaxr � L , i ..�i, RESOLUTION NO. A RE.SOLUTIT ®:._ - � —*?ROVIW DESIGN IEfi � i ECT NO. 13416 LOCATED EAST OF HELL.�M AND NORTH OF, TRYON IN THE LOWDEMSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLIWS UMITt PER ACRE) APR: 208 - 111 -04 A. Recitals, +ii'i hest Venture Development Co. has- filed an application for the Design Review of tract No. 13476 as desdribed ' in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as- "the application ". (ii) on my 26, 1988, Plangb? Corn� sion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held! a meeting to considew'the.epp icatipl\. tiff) All legal preracgisites, to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. D. Resolution* r NOW, THER£EGA, it is hereby found, determinod" and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga a$ follows.* I. This Commissioo heraby. speoifically finds; that all of--the facts set forth in the Recitals;;, pare*, of this Resa:utian are tCt'dand,cort. 2)j Based upon substantial evidence pres4mted to this 'Comisst", duri�hg the abgy"e ' referenced meeting on 1� 25, I981►,, including written rlu`� oral staff::"eporis, this CoR�emission herebypeaificall}y finds as follows:( ` 1. That the proposed project is consisti'nM; with the i objectives of the General Plan, and 2. That the proposed design Js in accoM with the i( objective of this Development Code and Oie purposes, -` of the district,in which the site is .locitted and 3. Thatr;the proposk design is, in compliance witls' each Of the applicable provisions of the Developiment Code; and o 4. That the proposed design, togetheY with the conditions applicable, thereto, will not be detrimental to the jublic health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in; the vicinity. 3. Based upO the findings and Conclusions set forth in paragraph I a :isz, this Commission hereby approves the application subloct to each `� andvey condition set;fori;h below and in the attached Standard Condition's .\ attached hereto and incorpor4ited herein by tttls reference, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION HO. DR FOR TT 13476 WEST VENTURE 1?EXELOPMENT ' May 25, 199$ Page 'Z P - ng Division (I3 �e raquired flood walfl along Hellman , Avenae shall b located at the back of walk and constructed of a slump stone material.'i The perimat r tact wall adjacent to Hellman Avenue shall be stuceb coated« ° With slump stone pilasters and capped. The flood wall shall be constructed as a level wall with steps o to,follm.=__ atural grade►, rather thaw parall4l �o the sidewalk "With the �tourses in the block running 1; parallel to those in' tike pilasters of the perimeter wall., (2) An enhanced landscape f da merit shall be provided f adJacent to 'tK will insets along Hellman Avenua:a The treatm ent ma include Decorative planters, ;ncent trees, apdlor additional'shrubbiyq, (3) Permanent vine' supports shall, be provided on the tract wall a0acent to Heilman Avenue which will yv accommodate future growth. ' (4) The final Landscape and Irrigation Plans and wall l design for Hellman Avenue shall he 'reviewed and approved by the City Planner and CIO Ehgineer prior �Mr� to issuance of building permits. r- (5) Decorative side yarJ walls, which age consistent wittt.,the WT design oo Hieliman Avenue, shall be provt4ed adjacent to Logs 3, 4, 8, 29, 30, 34, and 37 and shall be located a� 'least 5 feet from the ,,back of walk. (6) Tho ,',- applicant shall provide landscaping and J irrigation to those areas between the °sidewalk and ' g corner side yard wails. The percent grade of tim' drivemV. for Lot 1 shall not exceed 8 percent within 18 feet of the garage and 14 percent at any paint: (8) A minfmW 15 foot, flat rear 'yard area shall be r provided for Lot 2. (9) For all fieldstone veneer, a natural river rock . shall be used rather than A manufactured stone. For , j, all other types of stone, ma6ufacturee,vefieers were found acceptable. Of the cultured stone veneeers, the Brown Cobblefield San Fragcisco, a Brix of the San. Franci ca and Grey Cobisfield, and the Texas Creme 1 c Cobble field are occeptib e, 1j t �� PL iYNG COMISSII i MLUTION Nth. 0 . T 13476 - N� 1988 Page S (IQ) The use of she cape cod blue and mauve color schemes be shall used on the project's interior sold not on lots fronting on Tryon. / i Ehgi (1) Slopis on Redman Av�Jlue City sha-11 oat exceed .to be raintained by the � '4„ Abseparate` landscape ", S - and irritation plait Shall bo provided, for V411man Avenue which is consistent with. City z,stand4rds and shalt ,;* reviewed and approved*4he City Engineer. d 4tr? The Deputy Secretary to this omission shall certify to the adoption of,this-Resolution. _ r APPROVi 0, ft ADOirtEb THIS 25i"cf tIAX 0F W4# 1988. PLANNING C"XSSION OF TKE CITY OF RANCHO Ct�A(NtGA �r ATTEST:v Y ' U er, pu try I, Brad Betller, Deptifty Secretary of the `Plainning .Commission of the pity of Rancho Cucamonga,. do hereby certify that a foregoiriB Resolution Was duly and regularly intrpdute4,: and aftted,by the Planning passed* CommisiiaA of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning hold, Coa"issim on the 25th day of Aby, 1988, by thl following vote -to- unit :: AYES: COMFlISSIONER5: NOES. COMHISSIORERS: t; F( ABSENT: Cf IstlONERS., 4, l gyp$ ,q � 9 �; t 113 92 _ _ .- 191= lair Awl Z ON Y�_y4 rn, na �JN W! JIM i ail `-' 11111111 �� 1{t� C`•,o ` tf !�' It7i k. Pin It 11� L1�^�M�fa MG��..R= s.9L/1�'� W 'tY.eg�''��'�� a _Y �¢ ♦ Eli Yi iiiGGGCCC4Y a jal ' > i 1 � Ak iTA ve y .� ♦ yi �MM r' -,Iry .i /"'9C ` ju g fit "" vNi 21 4-41 fAg Xf Y i, kill VIA Ju lit~� wac ai` Y om$I ia 4 „i7F '� :.. c4 - f"( _ ,g ...111��� c° 4y�s'�9j g. Le ++�•;..tae n � 4 lJ v jr- AOL HR N• � KqN �^ Y� iW -Wrl • �p T V.• Pw�a4 . 124 r...� C A � w � a2 v" g' w ". Ire. � H ash g� p, Y 01, • '�i`•°+g' _r �'= egg f fed N in, �e �R, wbh ia 0-2 We sib Q » V R NI ZIT ~� J Jl j. Lit 'pig Sta wL.Ys Q... �1f •91 Y.�y ji?+r�� p�N w�Y4 {t' b WN A. gy00_ ���■ .. Vra�^°y -yC�� 3"''�� `O}'a� 'ea}t�}�y�{' ,�bfF�� ���N °i��:. Nq�',w �'a e.'� f 40N.-, �p pl ` .0 sfi �` � �r �\.! � 'R yi "r � °u: "• Wit` t� t � JIM hi it I to six 4! r w a g fill, till .....V � ��j�$� � § 1 s n HM "Rk APVFi y UA wit a w st •w m .i as j 8" a aff .2 tit o wps� HIS g i ij m ,. y "r s •, r His � a � � � � It -1, � ill' i r, i. y,� r_d5 11y$yy . W M yy M M �a I 65.A M A '+• Sy�0 3r� s� � yN�� L.fgLS �T ~ 6�v4 �4� •'o�iglo.�:�, ;Zed' Ne ii l. S(,y yy �t q �y Qs yi .y y� s�(q•i„I �jy'' � sr Y�I// OAt puy, w� G ''r"} »:SA s �t4�M.it� _v ' I W� Ln� Poor I �r �► ��� 5�-- � �.�,._ ,. , r�.,- _---., , . ___mow s 21 S f's Fu Sat ram al Ir ® w M yi (per Mg 16V da, lilt, '� ' o $ g 4. L Il Va gylr 49 i1 •� 2k - 41 man wig .. Iv i S Jus As- H Z r d + m �i a6 vi I a ."}�j -. a .. a �a•�=OFy4� q4G �►�.� � � C • � t - , EXI � y�"gv+��� ' fix• �� �..�• - . ad P6 A $ w y D It's Is M w U: 141 = 1K - - d Ix- da$ if y ,_ Es SM TIP, g g . 1z 3 .d •K ` w AA aw ;s 3, il I # I- - — -j • .: Zvi SIM � g 's— Sit tea p = sy 'Liy "� —ate. _ \.4i 4 pQ i1d - y tit ey��i� Y^j �f CtJy�py ��1 iiiTTT y «a Al Y y th � d Sy l�a:rT4 W all ,� r i2 b, z Us NE 1i13 j P « •• � i i09 I . l 1 p r. "� 41aP p d Y Y tl Act ICI ` b Vill fit V; ij lb 4 ply. fs S 8 "� yp$w�� i o V , ,"t. J� al N ^%t f 4 • .y. M A �• L;L. NP,y 'p y� f f 16N -R���� .3ChLt ,t a" 3 -- oITY OF AOCHO CUC OXGA „ f ��` CIDATE: May 25, I9$$ TO: ' Chairman and *06rs of the'11anning Comi�sion 11 Plc iyF h.'i, d Buller, City' Planner BY Chr' �tastaaa, Assstant?lannl� SUBJECT:, ENVI ENTAL ASSESSMENT, FOR' DEVELOPMEW .REVIEW 87 -54 _ CHIU The development or ,x a res rran o ng , 'square` €eet on 1. acres qt lard in the Industrial. Park Uistni,Gts _ Subarea 7, located, at the northeast corner of ned :Oak Street an, urei Street - APR: 2$-.3%43* Y. P1ta3ECT AND SITE DCSCRIPTION» A. Action Requested" Issuance of Negative L-eclaration. t3. Surrounding Land' Use and Zonint : `'. uran .c . slhr es , niFu'sl<t�Y Park, r a 7 Souttr ilffiGe Industrial Pa � - ►bare Tr East - Vacant, Industrial Park, Subarea We 7 ,,``lVacant, Indo trial Park, Subarea .-A Y C. 8enerol- Fian 6esi nations, e - n us rra ark; =' 'Project _ North - " Industrial Park South -'- Industrial Park r East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Paris" D. Site Characteristics: The site is located' south of the existing r , r r s estaurant and is in a ccnceptually� master Planned area designated for restaurants • It As currently vacant kith.` no, vegetation. furb an gutter, havt been campl�:ted; hover, Sidewalks havt'not. a site slopes to the south ;at approzimatoly 2 percent. l E. Parking calculations: Number' of r#er, of Type ; Square. Parking Spaces Spaces of Use rn a a Ratio RLW red ' . Prov Restaura t 7,174 0072 .83 i / �. F r t PLANNING OMISSION STAFF REPOAY r: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BT -5+ - CHID ft 256 1988 Pagel_ a,�. II. "ANALYSIS. A. Generals 3to #taurant use is permitted withi� the Industrial ar s rift of Subarea , The site desi -1,"s consistent with the previously .approve conCeptua! Mai Flan .far 'this block.. The Technical RgVIeW Committee has made in assessment of the propasxd nro�llCt�, and recorrende,, Conditions of Approval,' The archite aural - design, through a coordinated efzfok between the - architect,; staff and the Design Review y � ,Ct anittee, is co al ible'.with the I tPUstrial tark District and provides a tfonsitian between 'ache existing, projects north and sou#.h. Upon approval„ Cif thj Negative -Declaration, the -City Planner will Jrant firail approval , of the_, project .based on conditions reCOwwrended &'�,ne Design and Technical ,Comrnitte s ry` B. Desig�n__ �Re_ytew1bawt'ttee ?1 Final ,review of the project was given n �"t�esigrf'lev ew MW 5,. 1988. The Committee ` i— `C��ittee an n (McNiel, Tolstoy, Coleoan) road&, the`i'ollowi,� rQcoranendatton for Conditions of,AppraVal t6 the Planning G��on. t, 1. " All materiesif including' co7U d��I'Ts` an d colons,. should;f receive final epp 1 by the Design „Review' Committee prior to tht issuance of . building p"miti.� C. Environment-'t, Assessmen, 3 Parts 1 and II of the Initial Stud ave 15c.A comp.exe ar, no,,sipnificont Impact% have been found in connection with the '4evela ent of this project. III, FACTS FOR PINDINGS., )%0,j prop sed ,,use is consistent . with 'a he b ra an an nduustrial; Spociric tan. The building design did Site :Plan togethex with thii eftopAen Sd condO-ons of approval are G ?'; in compliance with the ,Indd trial' p t �4fic Pu n. ,n � 9 i xv. RECOFttENDATION: Staff Hicommends that the Planning Conmissian ssue a Negat ve Declaraticin for Development Review 87-54. 1�e ul Ty id _ i 1 City PT ner J BB:CW:' j s �Attachrnents. Exhibjt "i1" Location/Site Utilization tip Exhibit "e Site Plan „, Exhibit , "C" - Elevations Exhibit 4W ' Landscape Plan Exhibit "Zl� - Conceptual Restaurant Plaster Evian - Barton a 1 �... U9" c � 3 s c=3 07, �ti�iJ� _ x J •R � � ll LJ z ....i ro rO AIL if fij sit AN R n cam-- � u� � � , `� Y'i•� {� I �;1 �aai � y�� � � �� � �� �$ ��� • �� �¢ � fit` , `,.1 ry +ru ¢. i 41 , "A O �� s��' __ �: p e .il �� j � ): V � � � � j; 7 J 13l � ) �i ire .. . � PE� _ . �_ � _ >.. .f+'•�,.��te :�.- �. _�n '� •r �rh a M �7 ;�. i U �+ { �``` �i � s� ' : "�i i 4 0'! ' ... �Jj qqi � 4��' c J " CITY OF RANC14G C- UCAMoNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: fty 25,1948 TO: 0aitwon and Members .of the Planning Cooa:ssfor►, FROM: Brad Buller, City,+ :Pltinner BY: Riki- grata, Asso,1iate Platfher SUBJECTr MIR0fAUTA4 AS .'ESSMW- rBrNMAL,PLM MMEk7 8� 61 B k' k •• request 0 a5en `aTa on �"'77g he Geriaral. Plan to widen Cherry ` Ave e fry' ,Stet ArreN,, {?nth Stjo6tj' � to lntersUte 1155 fray a collector to a secvuoy arterial with an fik foot 7 right- of -i road section. and _Z) to a*rd Uiv*stor Plart�f Trails of 0.1-l' -al' Plan to relocate trail r} on the south side of 5umnrl, Avenue to the north (�aeaft hehue alena the easterly C. ;y bl�wnd; -. ;- EiiYIft08NEEF[eAL AS5ESM1T ANd ETN A SPECIFIC !-?)J F . a - to the Etlwan ifIc Plan o W100 t terry a ie frOW11, e; Smit _ . enue th Ala reet) to Intorstate U *W , a ° ,,collect ?tn a ondW irterf,02 with an BB foot`' Hot- of -way road s,Vt;i ; and t ? to a- Mei td.-, Cmurity 'grails #iap of �thu Ett"n Spec f • Plan ., to the trail on tile :sGUth sioa o Surit 7�errte t north of Sttm�ttit Avenue along the vast grly ".1ity bitty{ at siPena tie Circulation i. ABSTRACT: Thepe appli*ationt: re V- rfeme nrof th6 General Plan and %_', the Eti id6tS _iftc Plan to j widen the Ultimate right-of-Way to a a- t far Cfter j ,Av :re ar�i t! Sunrati<r Avenue, las, well as to srakt �ghtsnts in the region%4l equ6trian trail sypte+e« dais, Qil.'i serve to 41,211 ivr,, ceriaiA legal obligation„ ` on the iiart� 'of the .applicant tii, fry the annettatAott of the Hunt t ub 0". riy;by the City oftrta. w Based,.; fin traffic prcJectioAs for devtri'oWrtt of the fi4 i� Club Propt*'Y as bu tifa her «ten's Ridge Speelfic PliRtt ante environmental` eview staff supports the proposals however, based on review of the future de,telo*At of the -arcs has a,ftjor entry ° into the Cttyf staff reco nd$ riesigpatiod -of,, Cherry Aveite, between t" e' "I -15 ..Freerxay' 4wtercitange find : it Avnnuo as a� "social �Jgr Ww M and recot� tends increas1ng : thery1V gate right -of-:- ; way t+i S10 feet,in 007r to provide�ftr' Aaorour3Ate lansiSt:ar fi r Y y PLAiftiiNO C IISSCON -STAFF REPORT `RPA 88- 029-%ESPA $$ -Oi FIRST I I' [Y, ktOPRiBS c; .. Page 2 If the Planning Commission concurs with the -staff re(bOwndatim fa the item will need to be • readvertised and brought'. for `!l hearing at the Jutge 22, .x ^� Pltnn no C nission meeting Ii. LOCATM.- 'fhe applicatif n site is located "in the` vi,in .f y of " VWmMY7Ve&ae and Cherry. "Aveniiaab the northeastern piartian City {see' Exhibit #I'),, _Plait, land t5ses; Are: Noryh F'amfly Resider +iial, c it�t.o Fontauta, lit pirIs Ridg4 ecffic Plan Sp South n o4d Contral; East ttesidantial; Tie Low (less than =dweljjng ,unit. 0� 1. acre, _li'iwande`psciffc QU proposal tai change the designation t~t i igh d h Consnerc;tal an � ffice It being dfscCSSed Py thc,`ar apes. "nwney') - West � Hood Control Hr. BACKGROUND: !his request- -^ .FfAt City Properties is proposed �o ` mp eaten the settl enty�'._ent between llt�,. City, of FoKtaia u}.d the.NMY or ,Rancho Cucamonga on agtnkation aeon rlevoi t �^ of the' Hunt tFlub prppert . the developomt �!44,,as ilrinter's Rt a is ylg located `in the CfCy of.Fontana r% t:t1e it limits of Rancho Cucamonga along S t AVenue and affit of to G f San sevai,rte Wash. The proposal is baste on traffic and cfr wlaticn`sttdis, comp t t a for the Hunter's - >tfsige 5p'~if�c: Plan ~aid l= rtviro ntdt IA ►ac , s - Report,. z'hese studies ir.idfci,U 'that Wbul Boat, 'the pry *act Will generate i ,ore -titan t? sgOQ vehicfe tri09 /.,er day, rn orrier to - -handle ,e increased ''i ^affic, planned ,,t: dessgnatfs for C AF ry `avenue Est 1'ncrease, Therefore the appficapt , i • ' ;-re ; esti sting that t � r,. r t# ag' designa`isn for t " -9� r^�y d eue . a ii o S t�Avenue b a chang?d 'From vesidential 6174eto- ('66. foa rigli�� r of way) to secondary arterial (88 root -iyt of•�s,k, ` SV. ANRLYSIS; several i "ssa `Ws neeea' is oe c�nsfdered, iFt +'ludic trafifye *'' 1Jt` .,setting, , titling of ia►proyements . <and maf�tetiance of laridscapirq In' tile` right- of -wdy.' These issues are prdsented-as" follows• ` A,' Traffic tngflperfrg staff: suppOrtSr Cite change in designation. rrOm collector to secondary arterial in order, tom ' handle the' „r incre ased_tr3ffit: trhich i11 a generated by U6 Bunter °s, Ridge P e3e=€ Esee' Exhibit 4 "2" and '�S' - }, B'.. Aesthetic Settin Cherry AY -Inue a& it' Avert`ue -sill' Vtf ? v eas ern erg, r es into ' -the C� �v t. of it6L'ao Ciucareonga - -fine; a r' applb`cant atilt• imprOvi 'the existing Sumach Avenue in a msrer.er cohsistent. with City, standards And-,co hSISVInt 3' y. Specif c..l�9an wfth 20 fret of fandscapf�tg wi he n&'t side of the May wiVVn 116*hej�4t�e of ronlana Exhlbi',' f � � -PLANNING COMISSION STAB` REPORT dl { ^ GPA 28 019IESRk 8801 � FiRST CJIY "PROPEf{T its, F page :a ` }rte Although the n�provea t� s to Akr her Arenu eet� � �# ' ftmgit nue .and the 1 -fa "�'�reeway , .:rt er l noe- .� c �c _ �{ consfderation�, they fall � short Of ant ae�t�+e�f� setting for , t* atew entry to ~` thy':itb4twanda Specific Phan:. i !den" ds "tte ikersentia>i of Chet W Weme a F'r6way;as r& L'i Gatew4y, Cherry ,avenue apd -- 24t'b 4reet ark, M the travel -.paths for the g�;tersi&Jl. 4 a t.' o ,t . t? Cccrrdipgly, 24 St Met is designated at �Y.: signed under 'ute "unifying "the*, 0 the . Wwanft'.'_ specific , `Plan* Ta.,be r�:on step d' ifilt .th spaci i'tNeat fi "fix Gateways. -� and thy. ur .f ing th of4; he t wan a S ecif3c f3 sr, .Gherr�- Inrenu4'hnuId asra �e .desfgifated�Y -� °fit RTso, }� nter`(s Ridge, r rife vii t be dev0 4pQ to a Ilia foat right. dscaFing and _diaa,iyjder (see Th+erworp: -n Dreg tG' j_AV1d* zt,,_ R�;; hint Ae�wiingJ*gor 'a �- Gates * ;`ett:.`�ance to the , pity and ioq bey coi sir nt kith �i2rrourtdtng' devels}pp�nfi, staff re�rend5 �dat ,�!�$rry AYers6re' bey treated as ccnd�ry P ere €al ,with . 1 foot Faved t Sertion, e 14 f0d �edian.r am l�r3d 3t�g uitt`t 5 ha_ot . siQewalk .motions dir bets sides for ,t� ,tart g3t� „foa r3 htwof- vtay de'{ §natiah tsee.>axrl hft "d'"r i l' c riri �tf T t?ii rafi5 Arc `airs�r: to the .Vuntirot R Age p tan an�`en r(►dv^ ��`�itf �tior� Stirs i et #t fev »`rte wilt to it rov ' bit .Phan . a0rastrucfiitrp of the `. Frojec r lrvk amt of. the <'4�1.j �€rt "tia3l�.tf : -$,�J Uft Newt Will be maa f by thl.:0n16tl4i , wtth €i tine rz�irn 1W;sa Cyr° ," k City -; The 5p fiic` Flan and - �.'Lmjror rt ltitigatW- watoras also t , Stated, tint for ..dff .sift .i ror± yen .. i+? �mme, ighoutd be _ to Maur tares fn <�ardlay's.3usciea� n.i eject trafff eneer catcuT,afis�th'� end f our trva� ;� tats Olt rhQrry vel u d w i ocd,2r when �,i1?4 t< i : �6 al unite hat Seer?_,+�ccu ied t'is "Al t&fied f A fi L tu.1,rg�iorg Of therl y Monual n ; ,an Cher uni , sn ho occt.pi l� Thy cornpfe "-f-un of �hiN -Avernig #; ��ave�nts rrou�d appro €dc t s _ carrestar d to buil`but Y :, 3 the:or: na i i .� t Gour1� t " at staff s '� s estiar dtt $ter th s � �at3 p um fry+ auLan s b{�idin ah S is t9 d t4. 0' a t� xinaflon th "O • 4 1Ttsrraiiea ric;.' . �,sForssihi'tr, J 1 ` _ #LAMNI' i C"I'S '' ONi ST�a " `�':E VA 8&4ZO/ESPA8-di FIRST CY N AROPtO ES p25z 1989•, , �r � age ¢ WJ' "M� MfnUnagce , of,, Landscaping in tki ` Ri Qht-of ki far''ZI rep Ovr�ement5 " p, Jlb�:Biik aiAV nue , x ►. a - ` VI r, p6ntana, f 17andscaps 0aintenance will - :be. ; provided. landscapes 1i htfngy afid maiE�tenance distrrftt. At thft tilt, no provi=sion J or mafi. i r� nce of landseaping "for improvements within6Rencso camoriga I*e Web -made; ftwever, it i Anticipated thpt the G SY > y 3 cl�xeler'�rz Wil ri ch an ag "ent 0 landscape ><ta ntenahce pric+ iesuance of . per aits for Streit_`; fmp.rovnt t E. c.Aat6nd%ent _tsr t'he Trams "' 'i the proponont isr proposing to v r� ovate a :�eC on A e .5�1gna r#, trail �e0 �:he nrFr side oft j Si wait Avenu �: `this section kacrld conlrect with ir�provemer�s fid' , 4 the `ational trail system whfich the pi�ponehts .wfl cbnstruR� ' rihin tt�A Ci of rontara ayfcing Sam _wie wash port tha�j ` west Poundary f the pr*Jeei:, Acc��r,�d�ing7y ". el S�y{`�or� of the trrail east o� v sSan $0,e1ne Wash rroLjri be deleted. Stmt hat no � objections c "ihe� reUcaction of he trail �to the ngr��_�de of the right -ttf wa~y and'dei'ation of tho portion `of the t.!OI along St pit Avenue :rich ly} be re-routed thrPugh the H�ustet� "s. Rfa``e project. ,isee Ex ?" atld�} EYAIRONFiFyTr9L;, in cot�ciiin arit`r the application, gads. lnitiul u�, u y re i'rginary �,Iviro . 'Asstssmeni ' n confor�'riy th the egtij. nts with e' CalifoiMa'�Inviro 'At ail Ad t> has beerf p cu red' and he Omposa,i"waakdt hjjj ro s g��Eficant adverse r effec the ehvi� rm nt,,, Therefore, the �lanating o fission r�, ` make�o fw ea,9 ;tto siglificantx:impact- on "tide environment' and rec�iemend ce ,cation of a k atfre Oeclaratiri. f �Y. RECOWENaATYfiN; Staff r t, t "public Fearir#' discussion zi- the lsropose�c° cal i+irI a±dtiartaecfic Piat3rsr�et(s��f 1 the P inning �Conrnis.'Pt raa� Ato the' ri�gh� -of *1 t,� C c�rrj�'c ,- ,.Avenue shocl( be i� few; �1�� it2nr �€i�� need t� bb reedirertised and brought,baLk 6r` public -� � ing nt thWuw22,,,39ff8 r4eeting of he CSHeais5ttl.!1. > L -ij , r, .� 'Re L11S. d S nner 4 is � r ,fi.ttichmerits, Exh,fbit "M = Location Fktp' i, Exhibit ".2rt - 5umeft Avenue Exist- tg,Aiii Proposed fictions , ti .' yf Exhibik �'1S " . `- Cwherit Mende ELxanisdfsrti;aypg �^angrid .,•� RcOotpioorses d Sect�f � !ts Exhibit �4 f Avenue f Exhibit "� fi .�a f� venue st;�,Avenu�,�&cept ;F. Exhibit °`'' ' p g` i� u I� :� Exhibit " ?" • £rS.R Cxistlp G l7ity Trail R o a d,,A �7 fan p fi r \ • . k WE .Tic 1�10kr% SIDE : TEC T� AREA lV t' is TM a r iUN►lIT +AVE -; f 1 g `o :-4 SECT161,l l "m r'Yrc t f c � . � '. j • r i � n ARK l i d(r r - gK .C�14 l7 .. v # ! tteizjhRsan�aotl it a: r�r�ur�E ,�,1} Cgrrrr®ra.�f i iw Comm. tA cai Raad Y cammunft Trail D /nsity . r� — Fact r11 ,�1 Tel. S.Py :z Y 1� CITY OF � z ��� *' rH'. RANGD CUCA 1 t1jut I'RQPL kl:)i TRAIL PLAtt 't AlY(�Il T3Ii!1S[Q�+i EXH # MT, `� SCALE- . U � MQN AIDA , L DATE: 25, 1988• o TOa ' Chairxa ..aar Heiters of 'e dean ding c, mdssi�n o FRt;Pi, :� Brad Bulle►O, City plann r = F ,a BY Dino' .'ring, Assistant: Manner, Ql f� . SUBJE eTWIRMFInAL "ASSEISHENT AND SAERAL, PLAN AtROMiENT B842A 0'_ - fit _7t-7to­WjjffT th a an e it csMen o Hera Plan frlu die'diW „Reside."jti$l ($ �i4 1 dwelling trits, per acre) U Low-Medium Residential (4 -8 �� s dwelling omits per anre) on proximately 46 •acres -of �h tan<t, located north of lii�ir r :d l4venue; sou# of Lemon Znue ,extension, and west I the . Doer ?Creek MajIneS - =' AM-, Ertionk o. 201- 27P-34 and 41, and 201 - 271 -42,c t, EhEI IRONMEi'd'aAL ASSESS kW AM_ _ _ UkLOPMENT= Lr PLIANNIM COWISMN STgF °AOOQ T., ,GPA . SS - . / 8 DDA 01 �- ACACIA TMNSTRUCTI€} May Page 2 1 0.. Oenerit Plar DWSnations: ro ec Zilte ;- Lea ROSt dfintial (V -44 duelling units par north Lvw- Medium Res4dential (4 -0 dwel,k g units er acre) south - � #Alum Reskidential 18 -24 * ;� li g t?0t -f er acre} s East w Medium Reaidentlal (8 -14 �3,�tg unit�per acres #est ., = t adium4High Resider is {R' dwelling units per C. Site Charasceristics: , subject site is?'' undesa74ped and covewe w t:. a, fiat%ral fluvial scrub vegetation , s are the areas, The 1�i*osed freeway (Route 3d) 4 _ ,)djacent` ght -of. -wad abuts the subject site is the south along Highland Avenue. mot. c Tn additf�r to this C-eceral Plar1/Development District , ,A+rendment regxestj A, :hs City is alto processing a . tentative Iract trap appificatian (TT (3890, see F.:iibit "C") for - ihs ni= c?ject site (Planning Co *fission review s;heduled for dd'ne,,�90'Yi i r a II. t ,,MRRAL PLANonNALYSIS: The reque.c,ed mendment pro¢ases _a land u,-,e J li�s-ign3 on " c�iiange 7, #roM igdium Res?dertial `to L(*,! edium Residential � -,ir, an area which pis adjacent to a= proposed yr transportatra»- The ',a _:lute. project sits is 1 located Ti the northarn one- third of the City where eeflssities are planned at a lower range i� order`, to maintain a more rural harocter than that -of the southern two - thirds of the City. °Regionally oriea6ted uses should be located in.Oo�e-proxiri }y to = the regional transportation network, tq promote Amum ,opportunfty - U4 for transit use according to e objectives, of t rills r�eral j4an, These uses include parks,,, ($bopping maC�ts, ehtertainment .c frA auto , centers, and wIttyl�� j� ally , (hig}s r ° densityl resider `' Within `thy residential a��4� 3djacent',�t1orf?*. ays, i� 35 a typical . Planning practice to local higher- Beni tir residential usesi! Such uses are located near ese major tr ssportai: on ro4tesyin ardent* . reduce nner City tra tic, 'Typically they densities transition downwarl as the dista ke from major teahsportation :the= #etWorke increases, 17TO&WO local Vehicular, impacts, � `c In this case Ape, applicant is requesting" a. red Lida to the density ins'!: T , e4 Mere' h3.ghaK densities are typically requested. lli fp�to� ng itemsAi aps ar to jus -ti fy t3iis request: \ q \\ EE '� t� ne ojef,.'t sits is 1ocat in the aarthern less dense �14a of the Ci*V:� aad. �` ` v il. 8nc� `ex'isting.,.and approvpd Tower dertit }R '�'�idential develr+ rt aoridor are currently present along1his %ow l8ed�uer uarr$��#- ResidErtial�,,, �: '�: „ u IT 1 PLANNING I C" SIOH STAFF ,REP U ° GYA 883 42A//DDA $ii 01 =, ACQ1k ,'MSTRUCTIOPI May +26, *8"G Page 3 Rebause of these factorsi it is staff °s opi'Mon` that the proposed Imenowt is-;..Consisf��y,t kith the City's de"lo mt p;+a�terne 'The t L IApaC associated `the proposed density cart'6_ Mt Tgtttea'at the daYelo nt e pie pr}�i�t �nl<' l., Iri. DEYELOmENTT Dd Ri0�,El�*O'r ANALYM Stag` LkW! 51Rttires ,at . Be ev lopw xt d1s ci`s .e. ' Tag Qrdiaance, cons #stunt With, the fi,,ene:al -P1ai £Se`s titxi 6S6t},.. °foverragent 'iaRe.. r "If fit �Aings eqn now Wmade to warrant a General° Plan Anrelnc ft O �t►+a site t�'a how i Residential land -use 4siggatiap' fittdin shcttl' rlstt aaade r*rdi�t §e -,thk prw�osed DevelopWat �' o E. District Aa�itdatent`�to ``�afx -Wn the requirameck a;f jnnsist+emyr ; , ` IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESWENT: General Plan )&end mnt D proposes-a ed ion n nn use density /intensi , the by, °reducing it ote�ttial anr�i ental I* pa �.x atl -the nuatlr� ", of farm ie5 � Ispacted« Staff s c letod ��Se Initial Study a14d reviewed t u dr of n . fiCant s dverse� v `" tat diets to o gr as R i result of the:'pragoSe `aateft k0e.t. It anticipated, that aO ,i"ut i of deas.ty i* r���/is may bt successful III* 3; *gated at the Oeyelop* AWkk pj I roect V. FACTS FOR rtDl?S• " General P :atl Andmxttt iH-OEA and L s�`"n"�n "-� rill not b, dtrisaenf r' "& =w�� nropertie- --ov cause s- bmfficattt , laerse enviro mental x t � SiiQUld: Oe Caa�ssioa de er,.# that the amendxept would 'nro�got the land :use oatls nd pt•r} ss V the Unemjj "Plan, =*.he fob s —. ,o findings laust W, ode app A. That :1te subject'S:,r,Erty isFItuitable ion the uses r Oettaitted� in 04 proposed. district -in tt?ms of � access, site, and c(*atibOity with Existing lard, use in urtrouning area; -arid „ B. That >M prapwsed disi: t�lcndmt Avv would not eve a, s�gnift.t iaac ' yinra�rt f pant no?", +,a Irrottndfng'pcpertitsd -.. r� C. That the-- proposed awilp 4nt \i:: In vcnfbr a •with Sj the-.General Plan, y :�' '' i; ? 2 In lf� "" CORRESPONDE'W'E: 'i�tis iteo fias been advertised as a public hearing in 1Fe"[��i_T" e �t_ nerrsDa r":. a property pot-- � ante otices <y 4 sent to aTlsf r y- otters wiWh -ieet oR tt =pre ect' tt. 4,. I 4 •. ,� ..� C t �i - _ Ll _ fi. x, c A 6_25 /0701�� -�5 -88 P� 'Aaen.da 2, o-� �- -02 ._ o Y- r (1i f �E k r; $UWREPORT 38- A D , AM IA ONSTRUCTION �a 19# �f J r YII., RAC 9�6E►!DAI ION "St fg rec�nds that the Piapnin! C - .fission p ilea c id= idsolution r� wendip� apprti�at o Plan , ,Bene�1` t en ant" �O A and 64yel"e1 t, District ndment `88 -Of to t City ,!?1�n0l an issue i Mega rrai ecldittfon.- there6� desi4natinT tie p `oiect -site M_Low { *41,u Rest r ential. rrl >.. Rasp lid+' cu Br Bu City BB:DP:te Attachments: -, Exhibiti "A" _ vicini,Z, � VAp txhbit, "8" -,Site Plan - � Exhibit" °"C" - Tract Map` 13890 1 ., Exh it "D" - Tract tap 13890 of.Soecific Pro$ect 5i�e Exhi Resolution it "Ek -� Tract Vap 1890 Si' Uti zatic�n Asap of Approval io'flA Resolution of- Approval for OBA�a� t tr . 53 t 1i 77 rd W —j1_HlGRLAND "OSW .......... ORTH CITY ITZma 4 aw RANCHO CUCAM?NCB '- rITL PLA14-V ti(;",-Dlvl WION EXHIBIT. y" Est Aq w fat `'•W 9 lit�f• +� M � - h H �� Y ' "EESOLVTION OF 7HE PLANNING CCMI ISSTON'OF THE CITY OF R*HO CUCAMONGA RECD MENOING IAPPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN ` AF1E1 S '88 -02A; REQUESTING TO AM THE GENERAL PLAR FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DALLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- ME02UM R "rS1!)ERTIAL (q -S D'AELLING UNITS PE, ACRE) FOR ' 15 ACRES OF LAMS LOCATED 'NORIN OF HIGHLAND AV E SOiMTH OF LEMON AVENUE EXTENSION, A10 WEST OF DEER CREEK CIMA_tMNEL: - APR: PORTIONS OF 201- 27134 AND 41, AM 201- 27149 A. R664` -gals. (i) Acacia Construction has filed an application for Peneral" Plan Amendment 88-02A as described in the title,of this Resolution Pireinaftor in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amend�mment. is ;°;efer.ed to as "the application:" (ii) On Maj�,,25 198€., the Planning,Commmmission of`'the City of Ranciio Cucamonga conducted a' duly, noticed public `hearing .on the application and cOncluded said hearing on that date. � (ii.i) Ali legal 1frereRuisites to the adoption of this "kesolution ' have occurred: 1l, B. Resolution.., NOW. THEREFORE,. it 'is 'bereby found,, detormined, 'and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucarsonga as fol,.js: i,. This'C *,aission hereby specifi ally finds that al of the farts art forth % the Recital S, Party W of this,Resolution are true And correct. 2. Base4, on substantial evidence - presented to txi', ' Commission during the, above- referenced public hearing on Clay �5, 1988, irid'idi ing vktten and oral etaff reports, together- with pubiic testimc'ony, this .Ctmmissiod hereby specifically finr�s as follows: kJ (a) The application applies to approximately 15 .acres of land x .+ basically an. inverted "a," configurati ®n, located north of "Highland Avenue, south of Lemon Aroenue extension„ and west of the Deer Creek Channel,, and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently -Je ignated as Medium Residential; and (b) The property to the north ,of the subject site is designated as Low•,Yedi.um Residential, vacant, - and proOsed for single family. development. The ,property to the west is designated Medium-High Residaahtial and,,- is und4iteloped. The property to the east is designated Medium Residential and.is' va4!t (settling basin, Deer° Creek). The "proptMrty tc the south'is'designa�ed M�Medlitmr Residential and is prl�mrily vacant htf the exception of 2,, vacant, and b,4rde4 up houses,, and J.. it .E ♦ �.� �[ $i *ON SQMf. NNT C I .XTICWW}. A ACACIA C6WiTItUClTTO?it f+ 24'ay �5, 1958 a Rage 3 lk r. tc7 This miondwt does not conflic with the Land Use Pal, icies of the General "an and till, provide for devel'o nt within the district in -a j nWRO consisfint with, -the General Plan and with', reTated'- de and Id9 This aixer dment promotes the goals ahc# objects q of the, 6A Use Element; and, (e). This akendment would not'b teriaTly injurious pr detrimental 1 to the adjacEnt properties. gosed upon the substantial 'evidence. preseq-ted.:�to this C +ssion during the A)dvd- referedeed pabliC hearing and upe,fi the .sped €Jc . fi,�dfhgs o{ ; facts set iartt� ih,Paragra.hs and 2 above, this Qtu ssion hsi0 finds 'aE;d'` toncludesas `J . iai' That thi suhJect property is suitable for the asesr, V~ f /i Perinittt� - in >is_ : Pra��ed sti�trict in , terns �,!of access, sizes and - .compatibility with existing land use In the surraiWing; area; and,- (bi) That the proposd&,, ioodgrent would ii0t have . s significarf4 impact 6A t.!ie environment nor the ' sururrdirg 17 ('b) ` That the proposed anleC tatJ in ,conformakr. with the 1-Amneral Fier' 4. This Coaeission hereby rinds and certifies that thm prNiect hos been reviewed and considered in c*liance with the Calif4srRfa, yroa ntal Quality,kt --of 1970 and, Furth dr, this Cowissiun'hereby ric. ends.,is` stance S. used upon the findings and canglusions set forth I`a_Paragrzph�., V i, 2, and 3 above,, this t ssion hereby ! C s� ' res�tivas, t::, �, f, c?} mat purscnt to Sectionb� to \�O',ef 'fide ; Califdroia C'Over nt Case, :fie ". annii1g ssiail . oaf the CiV of -Rancho C.1caM&.t1* `Ixer�y recC pd& 4�pr!oval "on the' 25th day at my -, ;. General Mary W Thd Piann'%' Sr Cd *ission hereby rk"M rids eir the City vl cil 1 ap ,nve and adapt tt a''} „filan lnrendmPr�v -02A for that property det�ur�ibeti har'ein and attache.! as part of this Resolutip:het~� (c):. That a Certified top <<this Resolution and rely hereby,.8dopted by the Planning Commission shai forwarded.to the City Council. IQ d c. t PLANgI;;113 COMISSM MS0401OR NO. ( GPA 8842A - ACACIA 03S`fRUCTION Ploy, 25, 1gas 7U ?" F Pa a r3 ,r b. The 'Uty Sec Mary to Ois Co W ssin f shall cer ffy n "y —�, adoptfon of this (resolution. APP*0 'AWD AMDO M' , 26H DAY_OF'My, 1488: v ,. PLMP k COMISSION OF 174E CITY OF WHO- dCi W# BY_ ; o arry T c a , 471Mn ATTEST° ---r ra ! fr'rary_..; L, Brad ButleN ,t uts Secretary 0 tk4i P1440109 C issich of the Cif` oi� . Rancho CucWngaj, do nervby certffy that'tne foroofng Resole fon "Was M. d reguiarly introduced,. passed, and �Jted by the °Manning � ► stf , Cite of Ranci�o Ouca,ga, at a uaa, meeting °f the rnnir�g i,;sfian A an the 25th day of Ak4yf, t 88, by th foflorafn4. vot�tp vrtt:,�� AYES. C"ISSIMERS: T NOES. Ci;Slt#t3ERS. .E ABSEV: CO CSSIONERS. ` Y ' `l RESOMIOh NO. - , - - - - AV RESOLUTION Or Ti6E RA, M CAWNGA PlJAi UIi C SSI4t"" 1' 'RECO MENDIRS° PI V xi 'ELOPFIE�iT �fTa"TO CT .AM '. �1 egg -Ol Rl tiilESj Ili TO 1 DEV' MOMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM MEOIUi9 RESIDENTIAL TO LOW= MEOIM RESIDENT M FOR 1 ACRES LOCATED i.3 OF til6HhiFRtE, SOM Oi; . LIMN' VEKIJE EXTENSION, WEST Qi` T!f' DES:. GREEK ? E3 A2 ARit. ? PORTIONS 201,27W 4 AND "41, AFB 201 R,. RQcitals ff fa. (d? Ac is vonstructifjh has filed an application "for t4velopment District irieerdmsn t38 -01 as, d0seribed� in Mite ;titlo of this Resolttion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, ,;'the subje t Development District hatnd€ ont is' ' 1 referred to as "the appl3datinn'` (iii dp may 25* ig� the Planning Comrssion of the City of Rancho I GutarA a conducted u duly riotUod VL,b #ic .fearing on the application and conc'..dad said hearing on th�Ai date. � ' Oidl All legal,.Irrerequlsites to "e adoption, of this', r have occurred. ; ,J 8. Resolution. - N W, THEREFOR'r., i�, is hereby :.found, dr!tertrined, and resolved =by the t� Planrtiffg Cam fission of thoAity of Rancho Guaazdnga as- follows: 1 This hereby s ificl ly finds that all of the facts set forth in tho Rekit -. si Part %0, of thfs Resolution -are true and cor�ai t. 2, 8ase4 on, substantial evidence presented to this Goeaaissian daring the gbove4,4 'rented p6blic hearing on Flay Ear, 1988,'inriuding written and oral sWf reportsa together with P01it'testimonl', this Go i.sslor6 hereby specifically finds as Vollrws: (a) The application applies to approK a $ely exres of land basically an inverted t° configuration, located north of Highland Avenue, south of Leon Avenue e;tensiod and west of the Deer Creek Channel, 4M Is presently undeveloped. Said property is curre,10,/ designated as edi*zz Residential; and (b) The property to the north 09 the subject site is designated as ' Low-Medium-'Residential aml is vacant; the propzrty to the west is designated Medium -Nigh ResidentW azd is undeveloped; the property ' -to the east is designated is Vacant; the property to the, south is designated Madium Residential and is vacarot (proposed free+day ai ht- f _VV Route 30); and v- „t F611 piANKItC C04113SiDk &E:{O ,rtl`IQN Nil. � t- f 8DA 88t% - AW!, fUCTIi? N Jam , t May �5, 988 _ !' P4e e t� 1 `(c) This amendment does riot conflict with th'e Land '`. olfi the General ?Ian and Will provide for, dejelop.*nt; withir the, irroe 4 man"r, consistentwith the Cxejerdl plan and Frith related velo kit; and (d) This amendment V006 US, the goals and objectives f re Land �� llss Element,, aid _� 42 inis'asnendasertt wtwld net 6e materially inju►�ious oe detristertaj to the"a. acent properties. 3r Based upon the so�'stantiey evidence presented to \1 issfi-a. during t'hW above- referenced public,. hearing and "6,q t ±ke ;p i c fiK figs cif facts set frar��.ti ; n Pa�raar�r +r and c ibdve i (this Csrmmi`ssiort hereby finds and conC tides -ass 41'1ip4;'.1 (a) Thet the sub3e~:t property is suitable;:.or "uses ,• permitted in 'tne proposed digtrict'.in terms of access, size, and cor4atibilitr "f4ith existing land: use in, the sup bunnd4rr$ area; and (b) mat the proposed amiendment would not have a significant impact or: the environment .notes the surrouty' ling properties; and (0. t the. proposed: amendment is in confur�ance with the General Flan.. 4. #'s Co�anission hereby ft and certifies that them had been revis3rred and considered -in omi liance with the CaliffaFnia Envi`ronmenui _ Qua]ity Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance { �1f a- Negative Declaration, 1, S. 8ased'`�on'0.4 "ff dings„ And conclusio0l) s4 forth in "Paragraphs U j ""nd 3 abovt,'this.Cc ission hereby resolvos as followw; n< (a) That pursuant to 1Sectjon $iWO to 65855 of the _ California nnvernment 'COO_, that the planning COMI'ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamwga hereby rec nds 'Ap ,roval on,the R5U. day of sq, -1988, _ Uevel QPMNt 01strict Affiendxnt 88 -01. r i th1 The PI -1 Commission hereby rec(lottehds that the_ City COUncll aPPOVe 'Odi' oopr- ueveiopsertw­0 " --ct` Amendont 88- 01'far what property described herein and attached as pert of this Resol Won" hereof. � 1 (a) ;Chat, a Certified Copt of this Re lutiott end relayed ' materiel hereb . Adonte .,,.� he a y ,,.,., uT tare canning Cor�iission shalt be forwarded to the pity Council .. r i P4Niltk CCi;iSUk UTXd1N .. r DRA 94-01 JSTRUCT1,04 ss 25R,1988� , �tiati Page 3 - � I n i 6, The Deputy sec Mary to this �Co;Fss � I _ ce�tt #gi to the c. ' adoption of this Resolutiutt�_ a APPROVER AM A.0 M'p wjS`' esm DA Uv. MAY f 1988. PLANNING C ISSI � € . a ATTEST 'K a er, V5puuW -ere ark I, Brad Puller, Deputy Secretq�;�' ry uf` the Planningn #scion of the star` Rancho 0camongak.do heri�by :ei` ify bat the teregdin# .��eluti I rats duly nd regularly #nGradt:�:ad, pasted,. and add ted by �a Planning C issibr of e City of Mancha Ct oneta,, ate regultr1 eting jpt, the Planning fi Wssiop h6l4 on the 20th clay of May" '1910; by�t3te fo�lowing:;vd� �,�s�t2 AYES: COWISS10NE'RS; Ii i C NOG "; COMISSIGMM: I ASSENT:COhfIsSltNrRw - CC /I f3 . Il A\ -- CITY 'OF RANCHO C,UCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE'•. May W. 2�8$ TO Chairran and Members of '7 a Planning Commission FROM; Brad B�er, City Planner BY: Chris kestrun; Assistant Planner SUBJECT., ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITION& USE PERt4IT 87 -24 square "or ia,y care rse y on S 9e aq'vs of land wf'thin the t,ow Densit, tial `Dist r=i &t located at the southwest corq o,f ne Road and Hermosa Avenue - APR: Xo77- 041 -54 111 . PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: s A. Action o - �.esird• Approval -of site plan, elevations, and cone ons'�+� issuance of a negative declaration for a Day Crre f;;,91 gty. B. Surrounding Land Use andZoniag: North - Townhomes, Medium Residential (8414 dwelling units per acre) East- Southern California Edison storage, Lott Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single F 11y Residsrltial, Lair Residential (2 -4 dwelling nite per acre) West - Single `Family ".;sidential,, Lod' Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per, acre) C. General: Plan Dasignatiflnss Pro ect Site a Low - Residential North Medium- Residential. South - Loan- Residential East - Low- Residential West - Low- Residential D. Site Characteristics: The site is located at the intersection u . a ec a va erd '(Base Line Road) and has an existing home (Minor House) at .the imarediate corner whiarh has been designated as °a Historic Landmark by the Ristorie'.)reseryation Commission. NO of the four sides of,;the site are he rear property boundaries of existing SC691e family dt hw,.A. As one l n moves South the relative Ria separation betweed the site and Hermosa Avenue increases. the site is void of significant vegetation. ITEM It tl t PLANNTRG COMMISSION STAFF R!•PORT r � 5St1 USE PERMIT 8745— 6"fCON 2 II Paige 2 E. Parking Cawulations; Number of ' : e,r of " Type Mare Parking Spacrl:: ` Spaces of Use Foote a Ratio— Required Provided Day Care 7160 Its) Sya di, -nnts 18 23 TOTAL 33 - 33 AN&YSIS: A. Background: i;tis project has barn' processed' as a Conditional' �'�erm-ff and e- Lan+iaN<rk Alteration Permit, The # istoric PraservatiorY CoWssfon Ordinance requires a permit in { conjunction -, with parcelization and /4r changes:.. to the circulation -of historic sitar, S. _Analysis: With the �approVal of . a - tonditiounal lose permit, sc— 661—sand day care facilities are allowed with -in the Low, r Residential district. The site plan has b"n: designed with the intention of parceling:, off the northern portioin, which includes the historic landmark, for future devetopmnt:` the proposed configuration siies� the day care building, . -and,` playground directly adjacent.!-to residential tracts the we5t and to the south. An acoustical analysis has been prepared which "Addresses noise generated from tre project on the surrounding neighborhood'cs well as noise effects an the. project, � yvsu'ita of t�,6 analysis have indicated that planting and a six footblock wall Will suffice in buffering the adjoin ng neighborhood frog- the ,. day care facility. The project is located within: the City designated Rad Hill Fault Zone and a geologk report has been prepared. he City's geologic consultant, has made the determ natfin that a the a; sut�itted report .. is adequate. The ,report recomends that because 1nuest#_oakians. ha_�tt not reve&Ud evidence of far4,lting, structures ConStruCtea X01 huan di:cupancy accordingly to aC7th5tand a C.. stichter ngnitude earthquake - which is expected =410 -ag "T-no.- Cucamonga,, fault, Loco l approximately 2.75 miles north t'f the site. ConitruotjC n measures will he reviewed and approved by the Building office Technical and Design Committees and the Historic` Preservation Coamissian have reviewed the project and have Made recommendatiom for conditions of approval. _ INNI u PE,EiTt €RtG COhQRIgIO�t' siAF� REOR7y`' ~: COWITTONAl. :;USE PE101 -T 8T 2*s - GERftk . May 25, 1484, I Cy Design tveYieYd G mittee: The . C ttee Shit` e3> E�» rick, if u rr� t t Oject orr Apra 2i,,: y a€id made the foi- towing recoanciations: ' Oiesign Rev; ew t _iottee w , divided on the �Na The p ro proposed' use a c �� J Planning Cojmdjsf on should dotenaine the toit appxoishiate "roof material for the project. ; .. 2w pddit�ianal fenistration or a Similar treatment shoull be ,provided at the budding ,r 'T entry tit create _sYitrY. 3. 8xposed rafter .tails should rb provided `an an n el eVatiotrS. 4;1 Lqf i 4 . The river rock d cR�site should 5e of they . co�i brsN'as. thus �`a sed f ©r the publ iu right of i irRpriveraerfts atof Hermose, - Avenuti;' _ x S. The de5igrt vi'., the. attic tints should be �revi 24_ to diminish a extend of the exposure the interior attitC�spac . ,._ r � �i> c J ZI a Go Textur,,ed paving should �e used at points- of ' 7. Ornamental iandscapi tg tlrpioal of the bungalow!" 0r4 should be provided. r` 8. Decorative lighting should be provided onmsirg, 9. A site 1.14 study► should be p6epared for the south Pie t 'line, to determine the greed for addii io`ilal ` 1 roof articulation for the, ou roof pla",, T ;t IO. Accent planting should occur At project etari.es whicb create nrs entry,' sate+aentR 11. A landscape focal poin�} should be;establisited at the 3riui' etc! of the' dritia'. off of _Hasp: Line Read. 32. In order, to create an e. ,� Rvirct� dent which ia�ll prt~� VW_ ., the or final character of the exiAirg- hour a Y� planting scheme, should be - \N ,prepared ��r parCel.� rahi�h %s rein #scat o� a grove, PLANNING f,"JISS104 sT F,'tEPiiRI' r �CONLi2,�Q+�''E�r�NT� qq Q�+-1989-- Page 4 ;` 11 r, 1 Fencing should he ',zro4*ded. around parcec 2 Which is am the se as that used to enclos*e' ��e playground on parcel 1. 14. Special attention should be iven to the landscape treatment along the street adjoining, titan historic= landmark. 15. All revisions shOuld ,"be' aubject� to" City planner review and approval. ; D. Historic F *EServation cCo►tntiss on e #iis orTa .Pro erttat1on Cow son met an I an .disr�ssed tC1E.sigttificance of the Minor Fiotrse in relation to they. pt opcsed" parcelixation of the Gerber 'siie and He development of the doy care f'acj ity. = E{ The Commission voiced Cstncer'ns at� earlier meetings regarding the .architecture of the day care :°acijity and its relation to the Historic Minor jiatise. the Fet$tOM'14"Yeservation Conmis ion was satisfied that the achitecture -r'efjected as Dwelt as posa3bte the arCj,:Nectur^al ch'arac'ter of the landmark. Specific discu'ss:an,�C� ttr�r, was given to the roof materials prOP®sed- --site A torfc tomiissign determined that In this, specific' instalce an architectural ca..�positiCn shingle was appropt'fate because it mr� closely retains the, architectural ; charact r of a C aift-, pis_= ouhgalow...The Con ission also felt that siiilar roof'taatePtals wau'�d he+Tp to integrate the entire site as a singular ;_. 4:ect _kith emphasis on the Historic Landmark. �:t Lands capinl for parct�,: ��,f a — iiscusseO. It tubs the Intention the 'Comisstq.c 3ta of ach!eve a landscaping palettetj , which would emulate the arjO&Al nature of the site. E. EnvirowwnW Assessment, Part$ I end 2 of the initial ,stuff+ -been "DT's%urban0 have c��'d: to a historical resource has ° been detentine-d td be an environmental impact, however. mitigation;.=measuret havR btaerj: loutlined in ° response to the cancerrts. No other significant impacts have been foun� elated to construct #nn of this p0deect.� �% 111. FACTS FOR FINOMS: ' he buij`jngls design and site Plan, t *� hers Qifh to recoe3eo cnndit'ions of approval,,, are in compliance with the Deve3,cpmetrt Code ana. ether .a cable :Oita standards.: CORRESPONDENCE: This itr^bt _too beta advertised' as a public beanie iiY�Re or�t ttetrspapr end !ll ,. property, srs tvithitt ' SO eet B o t— + area have. bee►.,;�tat0,jed. 1rt addition•: ' �� earinQ '�fotices av t e postezt, on try sub�kt property, f �• '~ 4W It OY141 lr AKA [V 13 EtliAi - •- .sy.�..�.. 'i1ilYUp u►?)t unw ° asi�raa ,d 1 o E $ 9 s� J IL I L-1 C. q.r- w..SQv .. Ask Ile 4' U °•o`y�. i 1 Y( d w•n•w rn�i ,ia.iai�evsmi•�• nwra.•+a.w..',: r.:.. f vim i "y . b Pl` e tt IfF s_, y i ITT-' �t e 6 r i + + r.,. +. • + � �. ��,ri � t Sl � �� II t� � �, r r y.. r, . jj1 I 111 .ic .• r�A, +,. 1, li �; , r,lr rr I 1 � tl �77 ICI ! !t (r r �dl ri r • ar. � 3 a) j r r [ _. i, h/ � t,�,. t �►w a' Ntlwy6�cp4��a�rtu�u,�+(q(�kWUCS ��}p�('j' ®� �j `C _.� -P°��; }•m` een.e..o�q /ej"+rwi''�:. ' /1 -, ` �-� 3 �r �:� i r. , fill S , fill �� E ,IIU rd� III p f T ry �l'fill f .. o r 7 i . F ✓ 141 I Aii N Nj r !, `�'' �"""- ..'..."''�^�'��' •Ltd.. :' It J '♦ � Y. Tom. +♦ °�y. � � � `K rF i%' �,�i -y; � �� ' . skis C44 1 Y .1 • Id #jj L A? <` AAA v. .,f. nie rt RESad.td"� i61�LIC4. A RESVUTt. E( OF THl RANCHO CUC;AMRNBi; PLANNIW COMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL, USE PEMIT NO. 87-24 FOR A 7,200 SQUARE, T I►fV tog FACIL17 LOCATE49 .�- �rlE MMSr >' CORNER � 'W u B k` � HE � ROAD 'Ate . ?i�� b' iN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL OXSTRj It � APR; 1t177.b4g 4 A. �ecec� itals,. s (i) Berber Childrertas Centers: incorporated loos flied an application for the issuance of the Conditional Usc Permit Yics; 87-24 as described in the title of �t4is Resolution ilereinaftftr in V'6is Resolution, the subJect . t, andit%�Ml Usk Pr!rasit rarest is. referred to as "the application'", On e 26th of ft IM, the Planning Cons fssjo!: the City of Rancho Cucamonga c nducted a duly noticed public,hearing en the application and concluded said eating.on that date, A prere, isites to tine adoption of this 'Resolution have occkirrt-j, 8. Resolution.. NOW,. �EREFQRE, it is hereby found,., doterasinid iro, resolved by, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as toil 1. - dais Commission hereby `speeifleal:ly finds tha all of t"hP. facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A� of this Resolution are t and omrrect. 2. Based upon substantial a idence' presented to this Cowl'ssion during the abovo- references! pyablic hearing " May 26th, 1988.' including written and oral stafr" 'i�egorts, together with public `teskinRany, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows.- (a) The application applies to property located fat° 1000 Rase Line Read; and (b) The property to the north of the subJect"site1is a iti- family residential project, the propertyto the south of that site consists of single faaaily p .. eS the property to the east is a G't_ storage facility, and the property toe west is a .single family development; and (eil The site contains a City designated Historic Landmark; and (d) the s1tt 3s within the Ci zone* ty desfio:xate Red 'Hill fanit 3. Based upon the substaptial ovidence presented to this *ion during the above - referenced public herring and upon the 5peciftcofinding `of- fak{ts, set forth in aaragrap 1 and 2 above, this CommissioW.,hereby fj�nds And tonc-ludes as foiiows 0 PLl4NOO �i$ JiSSIE P ,R�' �.l1FTfl hi, ' i C a zrrO�. USE,p tXr Ma. MAY 25� lg8ii � a� Thitt the jr0posed use is to aCC4, d wf*ir the ,r}� rat Ay`iA,rnr, ¢homey oy6jectiivas bf? aP iryh4�eTbp�eat Code,, and 4Gf a.si+FYw F F h �epl4i Y+4 it if1F�n the oca .3ite is lted. s . a f; y{ t. {t}1 lii4 `� ,A +1. o pr000ped us4p tlgat Qr' W t4,:, "conditions applimbrle to 14,1' , hot he l detirf ntial to the ? p .� +. �i�►` safe or. { welfare,- ormatrriallY'ink }ious.,toproperties , I ar irkeent`nr vfcin c3 fiat the proposed usa cnarplids- tti each of,the f applicable Orovisions of the x 1pptren Code. qsi$ 'tat the proposed archl *eater {� �r to ecti�re. of the adjacent Elinor s'e, {el fiat measures >have be takj �to preserve °tire �. histortcol,xigrrificande of tai M That a geologic sutvgy has been conducted ails: 1 th�ia survey has beta reviewed and ;,accepted by art indoperrdent licensed gtologistt inditating, that there will not be. any hazard to th£. proposed construction as a . result , of ow Inferred' Rest MIT- Fault, 4. , Thfx CeMission hereby finds a"c= ertiffea' that the pro4eat has been reviewed alb considered 'in compliMo with tt.�alffornia )Alvoonmentif Quality lit of 1570 and, irtrrther, this Ctti�its fart ermwby fs�sueY a MepilWr ' BsClaratfon. f; Bassist upon the findings and conf;jusions set forth fn paragraph I, _� and S. above, this Coreaistion ber�w approvos the' application 'subject to each and' every condition set forth below and in the ,attachsrr! 'Standard COO tions attachad hereto AM irrcgrporated hereon by this,eca 'I Planning, Di�risfon, o (l) The river rock used orr {sfT* shdj be of the saft colors =at those used., or the pualie, right�of »r*�r " improveonts at the corner v ref BASS :.dine I040 414 iermsa Avenue, and on the existing Minor house 4 . : 3 PLAANI➢G COMISSION lmso ! rldN 1�1Q , CONDITIONAL USE PEWIT NQ. 87..24 May 36, 1988 Page 3 {2} Me °design of the attic vents shall be revised to - } minimize the extent of exposure into the interior atti"paca (3) Textured paving shall be `sed at, ,noirtcs of �rtgresst' I egress, _ r l4? Ornamenta} landscaping CyAica'i of the "bungalox+° era shall be provided, E5} Decorative lfghting shall. be provided ranMs �el 6) Accent planting shall occur at project- o;,jt- rrtticir create 4n entry Scat at, , n� (7) A 1'0 scape -focal point sheil be estab, fished at the south end of the driveway off !lase C. 4� 00ad. i8) A planting scheme shall be; prepared for .Parcel 2 which is raminiscent of a grove in,,, order to create a environment which will preserve tats original character of the existing house. ft9? Fencing shall be provided around Parcel. 2 which is > the same as that used to enclose the playground on � —Parcel 1. MY Speci'a'l attention -shall be viven to the landscape treatment of the streets landmark. !.s a oining the historic (11' All Site Plan and architectural considerat ions or revisions shalt be s rVO-4- t to City Planner review and approval. (12) A decorative atterruatdon wal j and dense landscaping shall be:' constructed per tha reco ndations of the acoustical study to reduce exterior and interior noise levels on Mrrounding properties to acceptablmr levels is defined •by the Developllnt .fade ema . (18a The crtion of this facility shall convoy with all laws- and teg!i1atforts, of the State of Cclifornia slated to 'licensing and operation. (14) The applicant shall` submit copies of all State licenses to,, operate this f`aci'lity to the Planning Division prior to final Occupancy. � PLANNING Gt>iISSION RESOti!'!'iO$ Nty: o .: &DtAiryr�" PRMIr tKt. $74 Page j -4 (15) If the oparattofr of this y:s, fs inconslitedt with any of the'Vonditions of approval ar 44utes advgrse effects upon adjacent pr perties -or putslic r gtits- tft t1 of-Wa,��:, _ nc1gdipg, but lftaited to, 00esaiue I t. Ij noise, glare, vibration, _odors,. or tratff,c sa3�ety -Conditional �+ ,problwas, the Use Pe it Uhall' be brought back' to the Panning Con a n t'or their consideration and p ssible rovocation of the Condition0 rise Perati`t and terttiriation of use, (16) ' Tbis Ztpprdbal is granted 'only for a ntaximm of 140 ' children. (I7) OperatiOn of th 's us* shall not comence until such tilt. as all tlnftbm Building Code and Stan Fire Marshal regttlatfonr .bava been complied with. Ptans. shall be sUiAfl 'ei1I to the Building and Safety, Division and paothillf protection District to show emplianra , prio, to .issuance of building Aern► #ts, ' (U) 111 ost �doer ar _ ty including r�- >'atior3/play timrt, shall be limited to. the hours of SO:OO A.M. tcy 5:40 0 P.M. woukdevs. 1" preschool hours shall be limit ed to 6 :00 A.M. ,t0 7:00 P.M. on wtekdays. (191 Expansion of this pres{:t�l bayond 140 children,, n3sr Changes to the development plans or phasing, or� eacpansion of the else beypN that approved by this pe�aft, shall fttdirp approtial�p#.a modification to this Cond:+;ional Ilse perpitfroy the planning , Contatissiol. � .. !, (20} A sir (5) foot decRratjve block. l wall Shall be I constructed the entire Wst property length for sound ittenua tion purpos es. Location C,d dS�QR - shali"M! reviewed And approv+a�t�W'the City Plattner. (21) ;Yfor to the isxustrce of permits, the applicant shall O taiff rights of entry to the .adjojning - west,, propertir:s to<:c%tsitVcY.a six t& foot deco tix c . b7€°ck -w ll _ along tht; west property limo and to removo existing, ood jenc?ne. I tgineering ttiiison Aft r (1) The existing driveway$ on Base sine Road and fret' td Avenue. shall be wed and replaced with curb artd guttor t+a City stancfarcl tl ' ° u PLANNIM COMM sSIflN REr'iiTGUTIOPI N(1 KAY 25, 7988 Page 5 iZF An in -lieu fee: as contribution to the future underlmunding of the misting overhe ad utilities (tern Mfcation and elOctr tal, except for the 65 K eldttrical ) on the opposite: ,sidt< of OemoSa �\ A lenue '•shaall . be paid to the Cit Prior to the (.. iirs:tance of btillding pemjt$' The a shall be one- Sh the Cit y adopted 'unit amount ties the 'length fthe - 'southerly R� erty boundarx to thet nerly terminus pole gust south of Base Lino road. (3) The existing overhead electrical atld telecemnicattion service lines to tree e3xistin house shall- be undergrounded and the utility pole removed prior to occupancy of any new construction. am'• �r i (4) Ar.; encroachment Vomit Is rdquired for c tike ►. portion of the existing houses that,,will eetain within the to -be -dedicated right -of -way' Base Line Road. The house will be allowed to rMa in within the,�,Jght -of- way for the life of the stftcturs. C. " The Deputy S+!cretary to this Comission shell certify tee the adoption of th: v, s Resoluti. APPROVED AND ADOP7-4 't+:•IS Z tta1�`1�F ttAY, 2988 P a« KING COMISSIGN OF THE CT' ' OF "WHO, C�yAE NGA Larry y i ticc il'ei";"" Ulmn`_"' 4 A'T'TEST: 1 Bract Butler, spa wre ry I I, Brad 8gtl7er, Deputy ; Swretary of the Planning omission of l'a� t ie tild4W91, (16 hareby certify that the i orea ire <. , 9 "+rte wq.a daly and regularly introduc d, posed, and adopted by the Planrrinq Ct�ta�itiss�iatr "of'the City of RaMho Cuc ga, at � regular meettrg of the Planning Ca fns on hold, on t�ho ESth d of may, 1988, by the followbo voto -t� -wit: AYES: ISSI IERS: NOES:f COMMONERS. ASSENT. ISSiBNE3t.": f/}, Uzi 'J if AEi*�2 .� '...'~ l'u wR�`ri '�+*y'� •ir�T�iS� stu�aa+, gs 96 . t $ Pa-s_ 32 a Gal pal JP iS kill 3 OLAIRS lit lit is T 1 C V,� ji q. r - �SR �: �._A _ age e qui g'Sa9a P of ,F t• + � � =✓Y¢dY Y .4 11in F.4,b y P wp -5. J w M Y0 b. a W a' e. 1 I g ,X 9 � A f yYy � C V d J al~.0 Nill llilt . P, 1� � a» Mfgs„�_�Y X11,4 �B as al .3 VMS Pig lit CIS of I gyp! °d�6 V '�' is I�+�j t 5g �y Via is _ GG'�� +j' �. ai� a y e bb ` wIt i y3 >» A »�. t Ci �[ �' poor Quall Orr gg11gtp, _ 3w a`� g..-. e, P��a��.�a.r 'f�.�M Z ! `u w s,j a wd I'fp .�ej��a;.a'i' V�.ayyLryryryry�'.' v�qS yyyhy .r� r" 04 .,. �V �a :�1�_t ,.4Y q,,, gyygyypp��,'p°'i�m � � MDC Yip 7.. d �Z ^� sb 3ttl� y4 $a+i' �AMy7Pi �6i� n JuX Ig w :@ $ ~ate like , yy(irY�� Y f r'^ `i�L i3 w.4' %S � GYa �:�A �Gi -; C'�� i:f���,.:�ii 'C. ✓`�.. �7►��V1 K�.�. - �� . 4 C �X=A 3w3 Al . aF ,b,a� gTa g v�g ygt� tff . Run gig Tit VIP _ ba -t ins: e, vsk lilt 3 1 1 . . . . . . a Mj -rift LA p« _ fit. yp �.i 11t � ^ M �. �M F �:♦ � Q.� � �. (\ 1K6 R.G fr $�:M ��.1�� yt a�?a / S�s� `� • A s , 4''. ' bIA' i 0 ..t' w � .M� 7��.' W, rr�✓.J day. �� ., Y�j1S- MOp44�A. A, 7 N i^°—.� A - .. Nag. _. hL ._-, -_ $ �' � '� y , _ g ° I - .°t• -,g �+''t ��; �° `t ,+¢ �•,� ;� \ � - ��u__;,r.eea..,,...yF'Y_• - ..:.� '� -'Y i�....�L +gym+ .- $::•.., .�, � �C w x NA M C� ♦ t!` '1�. rk A 6. < F��W �i •i if.K C O ni a t 4° yQ � T�'i� 4 ijS"'G } rA �i N *A 4 \ i., a W. r r k �Ya All �,�' ty-S e�i 11 .'� �C j;r"�R�(��"\. f l� l ��$z}p`,. -•` J ,v +a y 'Ms od k ma i w \ ., !A °' OT N � §' DD44 RR ar e r Uzi SS 8 4. gr 743_6 ,\P {p ygq�� .,'yi'o^ b�N !»12 ..�5 a3 Yl�.�� w� 4�➢ •�l Y��� '� 1 w is aL P AiR P, 3 gi ��1 �q$P � ,Yt a f a(q %� 0. R - 1�."'•• 4ib o,` "`�„r fig' wCwe :.w'��qg`� ..b '�°F �.. c°�.y�',. �,^. � �. ) /f�j µ Mq •`t ati'� ! .F! �:= N�''� �.N ij �•V g .i ii Y'tiv j�r t.°yi•.'�Zi 4"f �30^ �ra�. �li �o� ����r .ea 4c` �• X 71 �o �Fy.ff rk f dA �� C► 3�' _ �g La 111- NIXS a i s JI fib " � ( L' �+ _ � c <,1 F t�gcy ° yip w 3. ��g, .. " � iA 11= lif j�y" j 'S iN�l � W � '¢L }L, . M i iy R ark L ��jj����^^1F to i7b N ► �.D aQi rg u� iw �4 Zia. Iti ya ,, . i d �yj C 6 0 4 a� Y.. M �► is � i� N SAW As Ye �* ;,A 4- AVI s w = W1 .mow± "gt r, I,1W h. T 4_M N� / @4 1/'- ✓" ,tn�.. k:..yi _ �.��V �44!...r fit° �✓ ^ "" d� fig„ ^" L W a Q h ,t 7� tiy y y LU Iva pe- ti a `yyy6v a •4. !yx` �+ I� v' t.= ..,��pa �l�yy"}` ev Is4 w M W gy p� gp �t 4p y !A piiy i! r�•i Sill Zi y S ,.`,�E yy 1.� 1, tl f,Ilf F b0� �.�Y-�O^I1 • �Zw '� �+n aY•a`` \:V �f .Jl.:i all 4 yy �` �� �� RR WV Y a { M Ik N h• tJ •qq o$un F� fit: r 3 yu Wig° Aft u .. #A80i4�4FiR 1 no vim � � � I i i� r p Am C T Q • RC L 11'31 e, ORANCHo c GS NGA 0 tE . V y t o @ Y AM , o D OAR Fmnrr..-- • • 1. 'PARCEL MA FB NQ. � �� , � ��' ^c�ieirtlSr �iia � 3 �i• "' i 1 t j.� `•'T'�, Law' '~fat. � �: p- 4 1 tit 14 ty - (K 7. ir p } � MY OF L MAP 61133 L RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ° %aTaTIV ZxM« + c'� RESOLUTION NO. A- RESOLD "'ION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI1Yr ~0F RANCHO GJCAMORGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVIN% TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 51311 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number, 11311, submitted ,by Gerber Children's Center, applicant, or the purpose -of. p—jhdiv*'vinq °`1Y�to two parcels, the real. :; property. situated n the City of Ranrcho C��n 94 County San of Bernardino, State of California, identified as,APN 10774AX -57, located at southwest corner of Base Line Road: -and Hermosa AVenuey and/` ' WHEREAS, on May 25, p 8, the P,larinin �C=ikssioa held a duly advertised public hearin for th�ove- desr�rir ed p, NOW, THEREFORE) iiiE RANCHO(" CU G4 FLA�60 COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1, ��hot the following ,findlnRs k�a +;e been made:,- 1. That_the cap_ is' consistent with the 0,poral Plan. That the improvement of the r r , << � np oposed subdivision is" ( consistent with the General Ilan. 3. That the sits' is physically suitable for t►�� proposed d- velopment. 4.- That the proposed subdivision and Improvements wilt { :mot cause substantial environmental .dmnage, public health problems or have adQrse 'affocts trrr &uttinq, ; property. Sf :CTION 2; This Commission finds and certffies that the oroiect has j been rev ewe an considered in cm,'Pliance with the California En vi^�rental pual.ity Act, of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues Negative a Declarations ,. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel MCa ko. 11311,is hereby approved subdect attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: Special Conditions 1. The existing overhead electri"l and telecommunication service lines to ° the existing house on Parcel 2 Shall be undergrounded and -the utility pole �;- removed prior to recordation of the Final Parcel Map. 2 " The existing dr,5yeways on Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue shall =tie xemoved and replaced with curb and gutter to City Standards. NS_ 1 PLANKING ',COMMI SION RESOLUTION NO. o a PARCEL MAP 1 311 i .v IL ��. An in-1 U fee as contributTgh to the fus re, �' undergrout�ain of the existing I heaI utilities {telecommunicaiill and electrical, except for Y, the 66K eCtrical} un tb.�,opposite� sidg �f } er�tsa i4!�enveT1hall be. paid . to the Ci �prtior to tn.� issuance of build �t9`. permits for the portion of fronting Pa 1e7 1 snd the recordation of xh Final Map for ti'+e por'tfon fronting Parcel 2.. 'the fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length feom the so#herly aropert'! bound &ry to thR northerl3P terminui `pole just south of Sage Li&loldd.. 1' ay An access gasemerrt 'shali Yee provided ove the stnoy driveway and driveaisle extending south From Rose Line Roai wo [ within Parcel I irt,� vor of Parcel 2. encroachment permit is *eguired for the,-�iartin;r of�'the �isti�� Pou� that will remain within the to be" dedreate� right -of -way for Bye Line Road. The house wiJI bvidlowed to. remain h � Fin the right-of-wad for the Rife of the- 1, structure. 44� f� 6. The drixe `approach and `portion -' of the di- {,6a43le from Base Line Road within.:Parcel 1 statl be constructed as r#dssary to provide access to Parcel 2 prior to recordation of the Final Pj rcel leap.. APPROVED `AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH OAYt OF", idAY, �!N. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF "CHO' CUCANCC 11CA � BY; airy T. MCN a. � ha rr?pn : ATTEST. ra u Jer, Deputy Seirezary i. I, Brad Buller, Oeouty'Secretary''of the Plan eft Commission of the City of Rancho: CuC sc►nga, dg her e4y cartify that the f , egoing Resolution w""duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by jhe Planning Commission of the City of i�'incha,Cucamonga, at a regular meeting if the Planning Commission held on the 25; , day of tray, 2538, by tine fallowing Dote -to -wit. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: C tISSIONERSr ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS: (� r, g WOW 3 1,! AL RA pat JAI, 2i Jr Ky lu it b m g p iI S4 V aY x` aa:. is _ Y. US ».= Z Q ZZ Mq M IIA.tl4; 1 1 r 1 Sim— It W r j 921 lit ;s s Age. t r L a ` a L s y C E � $ sa r zir Cb ii yg- CY ;¢� rX a La v i+ +R A L eq ►L ! Fr LTV : <i. ��4, �,. wrv►_ M� �Fe� !�'I�It q4'` J Yrt » y` YT � � h•l ice}„, �, • � N fir 41, CITY OF RA.��t�C)IpTy�£�gcUCAM��fA}��V, 4 STAPA' ^ 1WMr.a P Ask _- 0ATEprim+ 1. thOV18 tt, and Members of the ,pi`arning afss[an FRtW Br�d suller,`°Cifi r Planner f :5 BY: Ginty Norrxx _Asglutant Ptarnerr u� E; SuaJECT: ERVAiiMEa?!�;u lkSS SSt� 1il MD irARlAf �k'ysl. E -14 r LEW request are u�' e— n M= requ ISO, feat : to5e CAn for 9 tS in 3uhct n wink the development of 18 sinn_j fad QtS On l;� ac'res of tend in the Yek� tr,�r kesidentiaa �i�trjtt Hess h10 2. dwOlUg ttOU'per a el: lacated d,, tike East side d'P hwiviyst Street,.. firth of Valley View. APt iild -st 4tf1 -D3 , f R LAI TE$ ,,7AyIVE TRACT 13614 ti L PROJECT A SITE j%.4nRjpTj6 A. faction Reduest4d- Approval of Vdfff v"ec #an.nce attssuance o a f( S. Project Gensgv, 1.59, duelling unf,s— per acre Surround Lar�G iSse and Zonlnq; V , Vac'nt'# t�l . -. irol and Very LoW Densit ' PO ?dentfdl {less th4n. 2 dwelling units South ' - par acre #. Existing jEingle Family Very.., lr�sity r RA'identiai '(less. than 2 dwel Ling j(q is per dcre }, East _ Amthy�t s',reet, existing Single Amlly; Very LG Density Resfdentfal tlesr-'� n 2 "dwelling ftnits G acre), «_ per W"t _ Vacant- .`� D.- . .�aneral,Plan Dtg2Pjtjo4, r N .,acct Site Very Low ''4ep iCy ResIdential tles� than 2 dwelling ztnits per acrel, Borth - Flood 'Contrrl: ' y South •K Very Lott msity ale "si'dintial (less than 2 dwelling` Uri it.,dr ' East - Very Low vens3tY Roidential ,fjo5s than 2 dwelling' units i per acrej,,, �• f West 4 Flood Cbntrol.•. Pt ;4 WN% i~O*ISSiO ,' AF- .RE'P(?kT, VARIANCE 67-14 LE�EG_ IW !'25, 19081, �� 4: , ✓ Page,, jj eb t, o EP s1tol-thtra�rG�tHS-tics.. Thy afit ; (s Cur ently. . vacant except for Vineyardf�' "d scruf9t vegeUtion '�4nd has ,A e?atural s ape of 8 1O �ercen� fr north Louth except `fats app rximeteTy .1.a acrcx ofc#�`ce . WE) dnd; ;S soot w t .4n of the site wh';c) a lope varying 00m 12; i Z \ ent. n A. Bat On ii t sst 16, 19Ks the ap�rv;t�nt submitted as appTicatiort requests,, a';xarfM', to allow y redact nits £fie regttirer'" 'i% 1 1 Jninimu►,.�Tot e -from 15th feet to 146. -feet for Tots 11b 21 YO -14, 17 and 18. f General., 0 r-- r, �' A The applicant to ": -is proposing +ieveTap the site as cc onity; with a. .private Toopt)StreEt ,oria�t @d pr�mariTy east to wests which has a reditced rfo�tmO,;, r#y width 6f'40 f4et land a standard strea�: width of 36 COA, 'fifth the conf4uration of the site, the proposed street design,al"lo�rs5the development of ^ additi�7al T6ts but resul`s in, the cresii66 of 91 Tests_- re�►ich do not ,meet. < the i*uired mt31mtWf` lot depth of 150 -feet. TTte reauiremen' �,,'fpv,midimm 1,)t death insures tit i�reoLion of lots,:` ; which are o: Similar site and configuration .and thereby'help to 9 maintain the characterband density o'f an aFee; the purpos and intent_af riance fis to allow fTexa #iT ` from code, requirements when there are , ,pt0al , 61kumstantes pertaining to "thb physical nature of the property ttopograpkv, t �� shape, Tocatios) i4at would treAte Pa practical hardship:, (� deprive the property owner of privilaaes enjoyed by othefs f� t properties in "� the. .sai , district (in �consisten't with 'the object%ves of the getelopment +roue). In revipkAng the proposed variant) request the Ffanning4Cow ssioa,MAY wish to considew the fKlowing information; -= ; The c6nfig4ritiot oi✓ the '-site combined with the steep topography a'lo;g the west and southwest. portions of the Site restricts the design of the subdivision,,° In order, to minimize the disturbance, - to slope °areas etatiYely deep Tots` a�e #?ecessary a Ag the western portion on the site. The project has been, desi �red to r, = allow - tfie -; �crettion; of.- larger Tots Along-, the Y +� prn;,e "ty„ line which range in si frj: Rv ; &,7Q0 to 4 r9 a L�;a C7_ C�+� REPORT X+ # gi�LA7E��u�%. -OAF �jtlS ARIA��i4G�GQQ7 -T4 -­4 ., _ o 3 { i squsre feet whj,le< ;allo*isrg for a prirrk;Mly north to 0 south orfehtatiof� f`r fire render .of the Tots. r� -the .. , _The�kts within", - ect meet kiinimM and"aver -lbt sire requirements for the ".district and are 20,0M and 23,870 square feet respedtivel mots within the pro$ect,�are oriepOd primarily n to , j .aouth cansistepi wigb, a existing al�ts� tt the ` south, and ae generally V the' same si and c}�jnfviguratiov although tl,4 t- IY,,wider� than trig existit', IYtJ.f' r t -il -L Existing 'dots to the, east 'of Amethyst = treet ark three generally' - quarters oft an acre or is er whit lot South depths, 4at ng from M, to 233, - eet. Lots of the, ,' ptpj t .ralig s it� site from apprMilowtel,y 19,jAh *are: feet :.to 25rje soa►o ° feet, Those to th . southeast: have average lot i(epth$ varying`.frm 1f5 to '201 feet where;, as lots to tha southwest "have an average' r ` lot -depth of i0oroximately ,145 feet. TW9 points 'of, access 'are provideoij"Ith the pcDpoaecl 'xoufinot ;= ; however, they be iree with a;cut �i less - than " #OO feat in:,, s reeti design which was s, lro$ect eng h. C. ironmentaT Was rtt Env :'' _ Starr has c piece the Enuiro 'Chi l st And dete' ned > that the Variance request have any si4nificant environmental impacts. , if the 01- inning copnissiun concurs, 45' 4{ „ ,_,issr�i of,a negative Oeclaratim would-be appropriate if the - roject is Approved r ; 'II1P FACTS FOR F1iOIN(`�r In order for the Planning Commission ttl approve t?e va'riance the Development Code regafres- that following findings must „'the be Wit: 1. That!.strict or \jiteral interpretatinn and,,e orcement of ing` specified' regulation wopld resbr` t 'r practical or difficulty o unnecessary physical hardship Anconsi ` ent . !i the objectives of the DevebPoOt Code, y r r'hat t% re :� are _ exceii ionat 0'r traoedinary or, coiid bons' ppTicable to the 1j `�irxumsiances property n PtiUiN Co�.q STON ST T RRPORT t►RRS C9 874 4 "- LEW F rage 4 _ 1 --r, UvolVed or to the intended u'e of °the pproperty% tb4t do t1 riot ° apply- generally. i;* Other 134 the same .properties xdhe. " That; strict or it,,ral' l intovnetatfiotr..and r�itfa �d�i�,of -' the 5pocified regutatio, would deprive the : applicant -of E riviTagd en aged by bmi rs ar, ether peapjr�tes.in the same ;done, :. d. Yhat' the. granting oft,,,the Variance VafijT not oonsti�ute a " _ 9raniF t� spy #al privilate inconsistent with the - v liasitation5 on, Otte proptrties classified in the same gartting of the Variance WILT pat 0e detrimtal to -, E tto 'pubT'ic health safety" pr , welfam br, raaterialli in ur#ata to properties dr im rrov pCs iti, h4 cit�ity. R YY._ ©RRESPDRI3EI This itea as {peen advertised In the Dail Rep art newspaper -ax a 94blic h6"�119, the property, posild4 an »pa es a y erwitin. A fet were sent roper ect site. k. RCCItiEP6A7f1Mw , . Staff reccenLs that tide , Planning Cornison , Con Tuff a pli is hearing, to consider input and- elements of, the projeo Afte receiving al T informAtion, if the Planning Commission Cm support the fin #iris &ktTined in this Staff report, Staff,, recol dfids approval, of the Variance through adoption o� the attached Reta utiorc. `,, c Res Tly t Ci ner \Attachments: a *41bit "A" wetter from Applkaft .��, Rxhibt; '"��Ys.ocation . p \� Ckhibit VC - Site Utilix at9dn Map Sistiibit- "v , subdivision "Ap and 0an�ceptual _19.adIng Min � Exhibit ""nceptgal Rouse ,Location Exhibit 4P - Equestrian Axeo—o Slap y. Exhibit "$I ", Ad4ac4ht Sputherly ft�o ernes Resolutioh of Approval e, 11 b / zj n ryryry af ,.i r 9 SATI�Y3ENT OF VARIANCE JUSTIVICATION =. ; GENERAL The Developer believe , the a;8 ;t .attractive feature 07"Tract No, 13674 fs ith exposure.to the dramatic, scenic,.; pan��-S� - view of-OCucamonga Yeak" And the - surrounding ,mountains �y �Jyiag n lose proximaty� north of the siee No less Important i /Is�� the de I$n of subdivision which providee, for a gated, r� private. ct w)tity,; containing''h9upes fatting. North , 'Saurh `and oriented with +,heir front. and 'rear yards exposed to the panorama. As a consequende good oxrculatiort and efficient, .', safe . access is provided by a rectangular "loopfi,pre`dominately. Ease = i�te8t ZY°�. Character,, ` YD To implement his 11ant for the property, the Developer is seeking a variance to allow for lots that are a Minimum of 146.50 feet deep rather- tbau`1. 0 feet as riquired by , the zoning,. = o rhz fo4owiag findings of fact are presented as 3tisti.ficaticn for the variance:, z`s _ 1. Them are exeRptiohal circumstances or cond- itions applicable to the property that do-pot apply generally to ether properties in the same ne !4iborhaad'.' Tent'ativ'e tract 13674 is -Surrounded on b lard. 'To North Wear is all. sides }�eveloped the and 6 . the County tIood Control's Derkens bebris i tasn and to the "and East South d'z:istin�,_niragl6 family residenoeii. Equestrian wrails, both community and private, will be provided „for Tract 1367+, ,ante though some are private, all, trails will 1 be open to -the general_.publit' for their use and enjoymetkt. `On the eontrsry, ,there are .0 trails, public or p'rivate, provided for in the surrounding ne ghbothood. r The exposure tor the Cucamonga Peak panorama.is truly exceptional. To provide the most exposure, =lots`oriented'with their houses facing North -south ate,jbeat. Thi a resulting view 'from the front and rear yards T6 far superior,' �I t o the contrary, East Westrfacing houses expose d6ly their sides to, the view. There, are. less wnrtdows and livable area � .a (� open to the vista i-n this instance. 2. Strict application of the lot depth provisions of the zoning ordin nZ<e will result i3► practical difficulties and unrncessary,�hardtbips for tbe” future residents,. Streets.Y that are improved' to the, fat11 width of the City's standards'> v result from tb�i /granting of ,a Lot -depth reduction variance ' to 146.50 fee �. ,'thaut the variance, itsFroded street zaicths will be re�,�Z�,; 'f �i�mb'ers of Safety - nectar = the public of ,} the C10's st4�f -are on reoord'as opposing improved width }� s4 uctiocs.. They- point' out that the 'public saftty wee.. red Page '2 Tract IM-74 and welfare mil?- ;':om promised with reduced improved street widths.. It is bett6er, to reduce .the., lot depth Z.3% (and widen the Iptts to 'comp onsate) while stilly prt,Vidtng ;lot areas that meet or excee+�c,the zoning minimums.: )! ,r StT.,pct. application of t� ?e z6!1ing �xdina ae. W I.fz, zzn the ; Ioss of exclusivity, privacy nhd securf �T;4t the gated ..` - jtnity. because lots would fract on Ame I.- If tale houaes do not face Votth- South -but rather Igast test, and because the property slopes at 10 %, grading of the• lots will result in elopes being close to the -sides of tine bouse and an impediment to the view. 3. The granting of .a lot reduction variance to..l4G:�0�,,feet K 150 feet will not be materially detriment &l to the Public Welfare or injurious to the property Improvements in the neighborhood. Pull width street Improvements are i planned with the variance.. On the contrary, denial of a J variance will mean.,�ompromises to the public improvement, 11 j Because the reduction -is so a1"igbt (3.5 feet in 150 feet) it witti not be apparent even to the zaost trained "eye* � Tbs lots will be widened to compensate and the lots will be a minimum of 20,000 square fee:, [ 4. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to "he k objectives of any part _ of the general plan alne:a the proposed lots are -a minimum cf 20,OOW2quare feet in area sand meet or exceed the minimum requirv;ment by the,VL (very low) dt:s ;gnstion fo fi p 0perty. Ji FMMM DWMM -,A Ph lip E. Brown Brown & I; �llins, Inc.'` 2150 North Arrowhead Ave t_ , San Bernardino, GA 92:405 r - RECE(�iED_- AN MAR 211988 �,, 6lwn `^7 A ws•�(' !!�� r i IN . i But VTW Am Pi aia at r .•tt r /��'4L1 ' • f } t � 6d� �1'`.�.�� ' ,% f,f 1 �"r• -\� �- � }, illya T — ��- �jr.=�. �. fft t,. r:4C � �' �• J LxSr•�%"1 r ,.,`! _ !'"• •> it >. z ! -i �i {t` a r•L a i• it ��O •:! y r. x •~ � T . � , B � y �. Y �, Y } '\Cr' - is�� ti f. bra jf i' ✓ �'� '��I/F "'�t� •,(a1,,`t ti •t� 7��'� 1� � � ,( }.�•} � yet.'' � � •:�/^ •" dt r. �' .Y- f -r f �' , �� �>-.�� , ! Ufa' -j � ' � � . � +i � �' •a � ltid ..:• S ° �, j , � ' x J it t a � , • � f � "Yfifii s •., t r f��. t � •�L r l: d' •! !/ sl / � # Sr %« i� ;iii 1. � •�: �r +} ,� •� tI r�y� r ! � %�! i ° ' �• ji i^ �' %� J. a � j '1 �•� ! 7' 1 � as ( jp� ,p � ��� ''.la� `eg�� S �si++�ft� i �i� at ,�i'iY' t� � ,�. ► � �l�e �� i x,11 t � ,; S J.7�: �: }' 1 i i al �� ;',i •�Fa��: ;4� '�J� �t '. z �� � ul - i ` 1 '� • a 4i- .Z.i -„ r ':r te e J Pf �.ftT I .f , J t` ; ~ - •i' tx l• l�l�lz a2��°'1 '���C "` •six `°ti""'1 .�... (f �'_�,,,�" �f .tlµl� v per y Y OF Y�[: ANC r LTCAMONGA i°iTLZ. -. ' 4AMING DIMIOSI i P a - �'�j :► C Se 40 L 7 iil♦13!�� (a r lLur�.J..A3N Y,LT i „r�.a` �. 40- ilk �p t i fi Ilia i � R CITYOF i� UCMONGA nTLX 1 ti 1�l( ; _t r "'°i � .L+ 't� , �. 1�.{.1 •. f r ' _ ` ` i ' �h It I11� ! t: �lo :4afta �r r4r Ejd ti�I is ii y$ f �` G ri a. =n dra�i'( S� s { r � S v i i � - f i r j.S f raasa a a !_- k, �' 1 rrr iRsjiltl'���\ ti ��r•`` , 7rLf `��\ �f it -•: � zqq` � .'—'• ; t ter .• —g' J' '�,��!= - � ' � � �, � � ^" -•�-= � . c N f. 14 rrk ,, . {�� - -'_..• ,7—_ ! L =� ���� R •, �, , 'r j •tfa„j7i G t�r s{ i' �' �_� ':Et � n r � ,`=sL � � ��C � t j, • E tj.. T�{ 4 '1si u{^� � �11C {I _ {j,tr • 1 W' ; _ r ,.. �rr, �+y�T E fir. � '�. =. �f� (h•� �� U 4�5 ` y' ° � s ' � �li��\t'�� •a��i=•� T r j: .: ; � t , ��T�1� j r � +gym r f �. -;,. � , �* i , • � �. � „� at oi AMLCITIr OF •� � � : ° F ;�� °;�`� Y ! $fir r.' � -�1! t q�TNGA T: ;:J'^tL +�ieYi1.46�A.�1 DI R IS106E�� _ iiidXHtlBIii SCALE.- t{ •!. ,,�?`�: t¢ EEC F�'4, � {'�t` I: a� .' { 41� i FF ii �. rl'y i•-. •' -Z4 1 _ r4: 4!/ i j+fTFt' � "'� '���'.. -• i { { , }�� €¢ : ^fir., �t az z�Y�f rt J�ryr 'tZ„ -.•,,r a_ ��� � �� f ��� °�� ti� ��Q�✓°`� t� ei o �r � rt ,;"x -�,.7" ''�� •,`. 4••� / sue' ,+ f • 444 � r � � I ..•�' � T: t •'� r � t ZOO f I I'll e.'i.{`�i =.'' a i S . y~`,,.,n , t 33. �' F� � �' .H T '� �^ � F 'Ti a � `F• � a ;;�`r�lSt� r�0 h � 7� �.fv; i�S'{1 �': •�. � 4 � -_ e jai• :, - , � «: z: 1 e , � � ,.' ga.a � _ • M d �r f , + � I t F . / : � . . � +. lr.� $ i l k � ! =a ^ N WTY OF RAINCH i 0 1, IO TIT% PLANNING DIVI Ir t,)) �� ° \ . � - ..... -.. —.. ....mss....., ,`.� �� le AVtNVr zi �. $ IC Afth IA wa. fs tiC 'a c \ •S1 .a "np q x It ^ • s ,. �p � a a &Q. .,y• ID -C rs ■ :+tr ' �,¢ � a � ,.�a o are � , _vt . 1 OF ITEM. F �JC TffLz. P14414MG ID K c, - -�w�fw srw da <e.�i+1�. :�T?� P,.�:� y4 r'T�.-._.s: -•,rte y+j ,lf of NRI YN- N AtOw M�7G � . �� ... '•+"wee= Za.rS___�:i. _ <!=... � '- .�- , � ��M .# t Vol r . f tw �\ tlMi #•Mr i � ► -�..N+ �17-s •� � � Mme.`.._.• �""sewMeF •i ^._14i p` {`p � ) � r• - �4 ,� .ems• -`� .< { ��.,� ;. NORTH f CIW OF i RANCHO JA k.: Et"NING DIVISION _?'r►� M � . i� spas rr � .+�,:�rn+rtiM _ Msue r . f tw �\ tlMi #•Mr i � ► -�..N+ �17-s •� � � Mme.`.._.• �""sewMeF •i ^._14i p` {`p � ) � r• - �4 ,� .ems• -`� .< { ��.,� ;. NORTH f CIW OF i RANCHO JA k.: Et"NING DIVISION Ia O Z, R-E—Sku—nom No. A R SOLU1',Xg4, OF ME RANCHO CUCAMONGOOLANNING, CMWISSIOR' t` � f�UiNw �� �tA,RIJ CF „ No, "87. 4 RE iI 4r� .. MINIM i R �ur jOr,4DEPTkLROr 1O q,M"f..oa it3TS, I� 2,10 4,� 17 Air 1$, LOCAAAA�o ' iN 1141 s'X �1 I SI a ° AMElhY5l STkEEf '�}#' of XACL Yr IFSE YRt1 , L� (LESS TOM i tELLING, 0411 ,,. PER:, i1CR 1 RESIN DISTRICT A. " " Ldnk oevelopmeat 4i s filed; an app iicati for i Dance u the Varia9ce Na. 87 -14., as de =ribed irk, thk'titie' `thin,- P,paolut in this ResoUtiotl, the s0jett, variance f±^c est is r fir a to , s "the applicadion<". _ €ii Y On iday 5 °2 8+i the Plann#ng Cri�isz4iomv o ` rt it F Rancho ] Cuciionga conducted a %tduly, aAiced `ptj' a hearin appl.i �atioa ?and i concluded said d:earing on that date.° � €iib) "RTl,iega) preregu$ sit toy the doptfan of-,- ihi kis 0, QS have occurred. 0. Resolution � �,'o r'� - „- , l lE �" ,' ii, is hee���j�,�, deter�fhdd ani�! 4,4901, ed `by the Planning,.;4mm ss€or. �°j- tl8,thy o Eanchu cu re #�nga V%ft, ro fssion hereby iNcally i`finds t.Ra 'all C� A�3 fates set forth fri thz Re f tal s, Part A, o re4'.vu nrrect._ t j 2 Based coon su4t #n6il . #v1 -dence pres n g to G issrld± durirg the shave -refer reed p biit heaOing.on. �sy" 2b'; I,Sm, 1�,���d$�tg writt�91 and oral staff repcxts, togathie:tiith public ,asti pny'.this Cei is. hereby, 4 `Y sped �ca�1 fins' `as .follows, fi (a) The application applie; to prgpA tY located at� on- the,Vest- side of Ameth,;st Street north s`I I alloy4few r ith street.. frontage of 6E8 feet and lot depth ofSRt arias pt*NSet7 ureinirt�d and G (b) The property to-the north. and of thiO4 t site° #s vacant aid is desIgna ed for Fl.004,C�,ntrol pvr ,oses , i; groperl�t sptttfi, and feast of *hat sit :`" consists of existing single fvAily easi'dences , Ad'.is,- ^,n designate very low MSIdentlal, density. tits° �c;an.L d4wllfog °un is er acre) i and c, , ic) the applicatfon ha ��be- is aitt: d allow ti r� in " the rfri required ­-.pt depth,vf 150 fo i6 I46.5 fe�4,� a ^fi 17 and Ia; "end Y 7 f �r"'• —sue � '* f�,Y �j � p "�1 cr p ei`. �\.. ♦ fit` `' l:ryi=Ri ,t +FS ssnH R ! _VT M 11 Q_- � v Nay Z 1�3�U J t G l J J Ea ?> Letri,litttfn ltdroect meet the,,minum ar5draeerag let size, requirements' for the M1er 'des+ Density Aesjd jti 1 Qist`r c and are 2 Q7Q4 and 23,S7fl square feet respectively,,, and i o , gee re r l y R, Cto M j a e � outht" cons#st eisting its tothe s6%t,%, ad s a 11 the stff s *z, and confgsrationi f asd" �P3 Thattlte t�ta"i�nE as speoi�t #etaa appl #ati, ynot be detrimeatd tu` oficvi �� Object vew bn the Gs:. a pmert Code anc4 wi`l�. noi. #tr �:: ° a Gt ri�rentsl conditIon. t roes r % in the iris rlC�t:fW_l it� subject .sio a for �e Y� . , )r v used gulp .orctre `substantial evidence prgsented,to thy' j r. during t6r : aba4r- referet�ced_guhliq het -ins anrr T' ,oft tW *i�`Y .0-'ss of f4c#s set ,berth_ n �xaragra6! 12 abdve, this a ss #oil hereby, fi�� 6d , concludes as fulltnrs: 3C �?' Eat ilr�t strict: or, IItea1471. ig rpre atidn ayd \\ en qrc ent 7, the sprcii eti regu`lstion would result in,, practical difficult_ --or unnecessary , .Ps #cal hardshi ..icons stem with th* obiectives; the Ebb Mat thEW ark q,cceti "��al �i rir #nab ;circUras �+ces �r ~con is #ona� appti to the propnvive or td! inteadde' its the J prope ,ay that dt►; ctrtt - `app'; genar!a y tts ooze �±rapgtC-es in the ;same distrt. j Ec Than .strict ci',• ? iteritl <ia pretation.., a 8dfdrs:eme4i tf EnE �Pedl ied �0 tion ;'�i•!� air = deprive thejjt plleant `of�prj��#leges enj9a 0,'- _ ainreir� of gtE+er- properties it �� t s disiV c . r 4 id) Ogt the., g� in '`�af . the 'Varian �€ at �~ n _-r constitute a grantjf so ial priv leg' 4scbn is ent,:; with the l mL cations cut tther Pr9perties classifier"'' , in the same dlstt xt � .� ;, M ,That 0e `'granting of the larianr1e wwlI A t datr#mertal : "to, the' `"Oubli he b %' sa a or 1 �relfore,'�r a�ateriall`irttaus °,o`cop6�'sey improvements in the vfc�n!).y �. `� eased x1pon th ;�" wings and cone' w -in �Aragr -a 1, 2 and 3- above r= this F. herd ap�rroy -w Q, � t to` each &veal l'Y4`ry cr�r Iitj,�n U fa its Ll Oti� " . rt f� ` r� , p i CES tYSSIEi REM 1000 Y E ,V .Vh - LEW DEli1� yT#1}Q}j p f � sbt h ' —kf,yt io Lek1s ISei;oiut+�'{1i1 f1ti a h ) J NC ' DONAY11 -21 E8, THE 6TY -- G1fG :tea aW%t ✓� r s vile, , Aya % e{��j r ;i Br2! 3u C'er' .:gip fiery pt the Pi fhr�t� Gqi� #ii�He C+r 7�' „ Rarlctib Cucp1001 4 do hereby �rtl #y a . t i sr fho , esalutIon was. dt #Y 'yid `', egulir.ly Mt oduc p4,4 ed,° 4od ,a y'the• -.8�# dug H s u o the c i Chu Cuim nqG a 'regu[ r Ing:o�� #1Ap'king qo m sszau h(R4 `o� U tf! 's dA Y ait4> 0 wi`G:: , AYES P ASSENT: h C9h�tr���ON�P�; S`, �� t ✓ 3 ,� v f � I; t ` tb IP ANCUOLL . \ \\ }l DATE: V, Via„ 1gE3 /a �. TU: - Chaff nand .� rs of tte,- PTannid4 Cmission t '�'�. if FRJPI: a , Br�a�3�-��BuTTer,r Ci v P "nner °' " �'" 8Y: On Norris* Assistant' Planner 3 = SUUJ CT: EWIAONNEt#'M 5SE55MEIT : TEWATIYE T 13674 - V)ik evt3�ia'garten res en a su lYY oR o :single lazily r =10 ; cn '� �iCres "of lansi 'in. tnd ery' Low 'o a C)ResidentCaT DistPict (lest/ than dwellUg.'units per afire) located on the, west of *Oyst Street ttor*K- of fr Val T e'y View APH: 1461- 40143 Rk 1 � YARI��d- m, k & I, PRD:TT AHs� SETT: CESCRIFTI' ti A. lac ion Re: uesteif,►EiT c ubo e+i C 4 !on ` e 'trua l .. i P� OR e' . , P�' �i f ' ?�P � P � _ P- ran,. ate i >ssue, of a �Fesiv,eciaation -" 1?rt►�ect Densitjf 11,59 dwelIipg units;per acre C, rwrroundinS "T- d` Use and Zoniriq: No th Vacant; p'iood 4ntrol apd Ye"ry low Drnsi.ty� `= Residents j, (less than i'awelTina. units acre] _ South '�`ExistingI si'ng7V wily; 1[ery t Density+ sitiential (Tess ;thanr dill %g, units per acee��, /j 4 East , Aethys9� Strtet,, existing single. fa iTyQ V2ryrtbat ;, ✓ i I� ReWenti 3 Iles th n .2 ^` *isity a dweTtin�gita per acrsi West Vacant; Flood Control'. !� ` I < #I. - 'General Plin�Designations: Project Site Very Law "Ashy Residential Massthar . r 2 = OWe'lIIng units Per acre) r1 -, North -C- 1106d Contro , E= Soi.�th Very' Low bills, ity Residential (less than 2 dwe7Tinu t units per aCrel �.. (` C, East I - I Lbw Density,, Pe idetit i r s than Rn lT1Dg is It mifts Pat, Am) s s e t `rood coltrol 7 2 n 1 ;= PLANNINOJCQC 9ISSIOti 3i97 REPORT Page 2) J S, E. Site Charactpristi�' ; <The site is currently vac�nt'eucept for ` �,, -neyar ._ an scru vegetation AM. has a : �nat4lrai " slope of ' approximately 8 -10 percent,, feors north to soutr-gxcep:t for..., approximately 1.5, „ acres of land directly adjacent .a the western property, 'tine- frhich- has Topes varyfing from 1&16 percent. - Oppositw!the site A& singlAl fancily hdmes that front-, ontn'Amethyr.t,Str6i,t- To the south a e single family hones and north and west Is jrthp Sam Bernardino County Flood ContrW and” ; Denmens Basin. �.. H. ;. ANALYSIS: ~ l.f A. Back. round The applicant 4 proposing to develop the site as a gated ' cahsunity with a private loop street which has a reduced right-,; of -way width of 40 ,.feet and a standard ,street width of,36 filet. The lots are oriented primarily in a north to south . configuration except for those 'adjacent to the meitern property;-; tine which are oriented east to west. -Lot sines- within the subdivision will range from 20','070 to 48,960 square feet with an average tot size of 3,872 - quare' feet. 'n addition, the- . applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a' reduction in the required. minimum tat depth from - 160 'feet to 146.5 feet for 9 lots. li On Mav 2. 1988 the Planning - Division received .a Fetter from area restlents expressing concern with the proposed project design. A letter of response was sent to these- h6zidowners by a representative .(ff the applicant addressing their concerns. Both'-letters are attached "for review. S. Des:gn F,e44 ew Committee: The Desi n Reyiew__�,Comnittee __ Chitiea„ crick, Kroutil) �< rev ewe .e proposed "pro ec do '[iarc'h 3 and April 7, 1988 and MOMMOrded that the project be'rgyised to address''gradfnq and ' equestHan,concerns. _ The `Conceptual Grading Plan w(Jt€i'r iyp`dcal 'irad elevations - included with the original suhoaittal was, deterrai'ned to be � unacceptable. The Co�nmittee'retommended that a revis4'd Grading ' plan ks prepared s;fowi,ng possible f4ure house, and 'corral locations-' utilizi�19 grading techniques (i.e. split level ,r> founrrations andlor, stem wall rpnstr,uction) which mini "i l the alteration to the natural land form. This plan would �zr�te as a a conceptual guide, alth careful of review the grin for c Ostemy wittI +�11 surds and ' olicigs, `for ftituxe Y TT 13474�, tic Rage 3 ' Desigo. Renew application or, individual custoW hame development, for consistency,4ith City + ;takards and po'l ples-, ' would still be iecessaq 4. G - t� —,4 Staff was dftect ' to ward Stith the applicant to devel op, an accepta'bhe plar, -which Would then be scheduled for review by the <; .,Design Review Cqmittee as 1`4 consent ea�endke ,item. 'ihe revised. Grading; ian was cooditi�ona �y Sppr6ved,*, the- Gr,OMg a Sae ' E2;, pO !and- scheduled, for ltl aigrr�Revig od Moth r It rel J'a ui'e�, have., general I jr'been . adds ssed br. the applicant nctu d "as 'Part. of the cow itiorbs of a praval K She C i�tee i pressed _coin -en :with the pbteirttlA availability for egE!sttUn idividuat, alots; at p s? abtre on each late far unit giaestria tt byes i� ,.� r Id additio;i, th Csr en tee reca nd�d E�tat fife rr¢ icaai ✓ k ~ \ submit , written lettef," to the Mar,gAng , �J� ictiing 5 that-open access w 19 q. ldvided'tfihmgh the trfi `Seruestriaza r, trails end, that frlturir. aid*5s to =the proirase 're ibhat i!•a: F west of the pre'perts, will, be prdVided Af aR tfheza : pprpvat � , be uht fined fr°osv the Caunty loon >,Ctrmtcist r?i'$4:1t. ifr letter° has 'been attached for review. reht� thx cond4tigr ,of aprroval be added t, to equire' iiasign RRvie�+ ' Com�ittee4ppeoval of any peri et Sig ferrr,`irrg fer this triAct. isea Condition A. Iii. \`,.` ij C. Grads, and 7echnicai Review CtWiftees: reject, was,, reviled bar batty C,:.iiitiees 'and deierri ned, a, vi #th the reca Tided.. c ndi9 i,ans of" ,approvkPj, to - Vi in co0formance with applicable atartdarcls and ordinances. D. Trails t itttes `> 174 Comoittee reviewed the project on''pecruary, -47 and Mara t Id, 19So and-�;recoitended ,apps oval subject to ..'the condition' of q approval Tide; Spectil Condition � � 3) E.�f Enviranmezztal Ass£sslNent' i h ,ate_......._ Staff`ha! completed mart I�I of ttltInv I a ai Check t»x�i.`'"ktid deter�pined #qt the pt ject, lt� not,shave. signify it , I ', 'y PLANNING C _� ISSOM � RgPORT > TT 13574 E,OK �Y n a Nlay,25,. i488�c 191i 4. enxirongsarrtal - iapaats:. a: f Elie Piaru ling �aaanissi)Z �af�tr5 "issuance of 4r ;Kegat e Vecllar4tjon woufid he `appro ate 1r project to approved .1\ ° III. FACTS FOR FINDIWS.4,, ` The pro e ; is ucan53�to�^c r i Yh?'the, General ` Sian "an3"Z��, opment•;l;od, `'tae project will not Eje�detri�entaX t4" the public- h ;Ith ot! rte( dty,kF or.'cp-4se lnvisah66 -.�:? sigi�iticat�,, adverse . ervi ranment�I i�+, s. ':trt as ti p, the groposd& as sublivisiq� Re. 'an E° -o , 06_0,4! v4dinsg -plans toge,t ter aandittar. apprna; �?" compliance with the a¢plcatzAe prowisions of de e C de and City stA.ndar :a its( .T i ,'� \, l ry J� _ �p IV. CORi2%3POi�tSEifCE �i'3✓ tice f Filing was tent, to dj� propertgF oknk } " i ' W .;�n a,'3i3ti" foot radius and th+'Site posted." Trt addition, thft Item has b`eort adier*ised '4M the public h arinco fh the f;tsilY,�^r60,ort „ siewspaper aft t;otices sent t ail props y a �d9thin 3fi £�+ t ' and the site bsted.. Attached ars ,Copies of�cbrrespond ice mq� " f sudng propea iy a3�tsers ��. G t { y Y. iiE�Oi 1ENDAfiC : .'"ataif rectS +rends that'the "fl9annircg `Cc iss��pn con u;, u bear ing,to ca, f4 input artd o�lti is on e, projeC . '�� After ,ric�ivi ig x1 itt a €ati A �v, f thi Ptabning " j C(Amis'', 6 can �;urpcsi^t the �'�1�d3fitgA ��°4i lyir'i� `8i.,�� and for this° projec Staff recamrwends approval` srough adaptton o- j1he,attache&1 r. resolution.: �{ l r; Resp Iy? 411 a7 J v / Br er F, d City Pi niter Ati cixnera?se inishib► � r��k Me litillizmr,4 i<xhibit Location ' ., 1ii 'it 6 -t ic _ p Exhibl't yin 1picaT"'Urut nottinq- {fir hib,° t "E" „ quesirYart ,ct+trrlAY ^; " Wil h t "F" - Le' Mr from, 4.,S $ dW i" Y4 2, Igo's Exhi41`it "GA -� Exh9it Al fl" i � qtr regardigg Ara•11 s !' Soot " .�fon of APpraval Ti -Vk ii 4 v Fc s VL VIL rpz +�Y y rlrlormy PC r-M LM •fit. -���- -� {{� !. {ei �'r•:.+r` 'L � �.r •. � a _ ..�"`��c f h f,T . t x 1 ti. rpt'�., +(�}1 S 1 i • :�T. � r� r � 'aac".� =y_..{ � '� �•��� ��''Z...i ���,,A.n^T'.'� � —�F.� � 8.,6tlI tom' B� ^j- r— °`.""�� •: .... �r iii ��y �r'js�'�,,���- i n NORTH CITY OFF i'E: . t sE _ i Eas --•t '�. Y!S' .� ' I= i g AM ve gv r i w f r 1i Fl • • � �" r v X '�.�� ,.• J ♦. 1 ivC,� � �r a f t 1 s � 7f /� tail � �w ,:: � ��•±- ��zrr�.:.J- r. R =. 'i - ,{s!f�`i �_''. tea:» ?.,,+t 'S.. M^ .�=";.0 ,G _r f� ' Fjj a�ti'F : f $. j 1 1 . r•Ixw .�. �If' ��"' 'r , '—"t` ,- °, •= d+ g/ 1 �}s' c� � I 1 k 1 "[`,-a t �'. � R t , off, t • d ,!r j t* t t t+♦.i , r ° (i�ek t°•'. L Ir � is �'' � j�� � � „n j iS �•�� ^ ° ^ (� c � \' � • I_ a�� I l �.��. •, i• � I 1 i 1� �. I 1, . j i .+� a :p; �! r c, ` �� ,tt� ( �� rw�{! 1 •� � Fjli .4�1 . i 1L�, ,Ijl* u♦ �� y\ \h✓Y�.ty`so�3 � � il. �6}.�1^ �^ i - �fl:tf l t�• : ��?�• i e '++ti,l I•'1�1� : , �i „` C'I'A m ..4 v. 1J \� i R is 3 1 ss f ♦IS ` ...p �. ts ass X !� � :-t ;e If ��C ,!k• --�.�G is , f� Z �` �._. ".r 1= .. �j � '- � —a lE -.�_ '•4,•8 l` to v Ilk Nix s � • � � ,,iQt _ ail^ � �� "� �¢ ., i i F tlllll{( ,�• �• ,1 t •ti q_i s l C A " _. �1` � 5G•,tl aim 1: '-^1�1 ti ♦ s i1 a ? C RrF ��` ,t r,... lilt• � g i �� `� t' � � b �' � lit t't�+ � 1:`•{. �' 1 � r� PillT sir t= I zr iI t - j pr tz Fyn+•' t j A2 � r *� n+n./' � G•C��i 1 Li'�igh�yP — ir���A�� .,,t I CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIViSIGAT ac 4 � ai•� i � Z S a r t. Y el ♦ r� t";, /r t =. x�j '41 a � �� • � x F �(I E y4 ^.y'•""P2 R < �•! J^Z+� x t +'i! / ..r { /1� }a y`J � ^� +•Z, f R, � R � •o r r••tiJ. t�1 �•'� < �, .ir y, r T fy� .. i r4 '3 _'fit: xY °`h•cY i�00 .y+�'.3 ) s. ; l�.\ ti--""- ;2�yy€ •.o ja +�v /yA. ey • 1� 1� •.f7i ��• Dry ��{ IfJ .�•.~ r$��f 0 _� .: ,� •�:p 2� t its' t Yom. 1 ^Ji.J t!. 1 S• �� Oft Ov NIS 4 1-519 n. {� LS +Z $ 7a � r �•� to 4 . .y Lt'i �+ � i•' { rT+ d • l� Via" } ik xtF CITY ITEM.., PRAAis ,f. 17 ;�y Iry "'a4i C arb All, i+w # t ' - r Madam. 3 t`�ti5 j vTR` .i5 5ieYti $'4 $Li a:flnvE'r ei ^ Iti2a�za •.•ti 4 =aa :1s T+Yti.'C3tivra aL'"3Lw gs;y 1367C c The, xnd .aw:x ned hotgmeaaner and taxvay+ers wqu - I i "I t, � the !, n it r 'Jr•�,0.`�,�4 _;al'J`� 82<53»`1,�W�` �4L`�` �2,^.ts'`a r^.5 �.�Y'�'t' :=,ar_ M1!.' 1,iYt3 t 114, M .. The st est v dth t n the - h� o, 3. s pact that a r�ontractjr r�r ! sOt *vner• =t )y build any � is ,i .ai z thaw a >h t ma*bot be poni,' t pith th br'�.{-.V :t1i`«^'teiitl ilt ,3,r.#3� iT2t"` �'2E �41:�aii'3/3,C`h�i4elT T f n a '41tS heal rought irort :�40aiAg is to be .ta th .` T, i �, c �"�'i.�Tl� '3 `1��72 e t�3j2'�'� 1 K� _ 5�' v'L� ti :tom ^tx c. sg y }eel than the lot sizes shou4d. a»ottform Frith i the intent off. the *at LF i qpt b'e ^ :=Substandard in Sda`nr x: artycbstanda:d "Street with rx tt' atI r hamper ; access \s 1 fire and roxcue vehiolA to tho", 2 )4- cr thine the proposed iraet. -, 'phi& _.will be esg4?cial!V evident 1h 's eiY+�Y3� Erahi Ies are prarkc,si at the cu r et. each sid4' of Gite` sts�eet, 7 ti rxn a sirs Sn s3t�xation. ILI t*Ye the't'a 4 ng 4,Y -" mis'tS 0 :bra S hc u Cx i.d xi ,r'tt 1Lt+n n •i .� t"a vrifi an Es`V+ 3 'xi .• 11Cz a e a1 of dw; !it.Yq� he homes vith�n� e feat of �-#* a� C in sail iv :t r ..` •��I%,✓r.3i•p.he$1}.,.E`�i$.", 0 it ho itie C X i311 0701 --02 o .- 5- �25 -88 PO Agenda 3-of 4 o i t.:ro 9-ht i n fen. cin along 1�mctt C,` aC1 ex W d h�i. a iiFting ga .x3 t Ly� and n i _rice+ a r c Y,,� "��k5 sri 1, n- urr a is t,�he side and reap yards :-i1 .tmg w64..z1; o "bring 1eLaIaaTi* 9 int,d Ft to mention t esthetic. t�np2� as��tneS� �x2ia Id,:,ui a caastb . riE i'e al dKc: pr e in ou,) homes r -Ai`4 goO4u+Abnejl to live in n ri�ra f *has cad 6 r An onsf- 4deratj�on :yoUkMay gives to v 1 .d� \u�' `g � - ' v " sn hr s' sSm_thys qua. C'A w 41 �� i�arc! � ': 17 =1Cria M, Mialer - Y E3mF FtYist'Ave. 53N5 E3ffi4:� 4� a f+:< a, CA 917,' ,.rT S.,= h.4Y,: {:,' YYtOai,g'a. 9 17 04,�_ ` Am l� n 1,. :csm4ngar Cg z? ? Rancho;��r`��Gs���. ' c'.17n' Jot 333 Amethyst Ave -Ita Loma, CA 917 4� u c: <, \ ' a C✓ u c7 `1 1 14 iI 'nom-, Ala- 0 ° ��✓�. ".r..r4t., .. �� .. eau _ �.� i. RICiiARD DAHL, E,4TERaRISES ? ' 54 4 CAR�iEi.lm AVSNUE " RANCHP CUCAMONGA, CALIF. v 81' IMf3 �Phone: (714) 987 -8752 I)AY l 41988 e� J7L- 4X11.5.;. REFERVCE: LENK bSVzTs. MNT'TRACT,13674 4j This letter is in response to 0 concorns expressed in" reference to Tentative Tract 13674 :r14 to clarify any missundersi;andings. I will address each conc6rr,.,,Ui the. order it appeared in tyje letter to the Ploaming commission ated A ril 26, 1908. E ZZ-. :' the concern over substandard lot sizes. The lot sizes pzoposed i.tl this tract are la accordance with the Citys4,,Development Code which requires an Overall lot ateraO in an equestrian tract be 22,500 sq. feet with a minimum lot size of, 20,000 sq. £eat. Tract 13674 has ap-7average lot size of ,�,Wprox;. 23 -�= sq. feet and a minimum of 20x100 °Sq. feet.' 4ECCND, The concern over substandard street widths Vie Average size -,s`arface street in Rancho Cucamonga is thirty -six feet. The street w.idt� in tract 1:3674 is,'also 36 £eet, which is larger thou most private stv e`s. T.HIM, The :.evelcperl• an buildriny size dwelling an these lots.. This is a true stattement because the city has no ordinance controlling unit mi am zizes, except for'' 900 sq. ft., however ccapatability'is contr�Ilea by design review committee and the Planning Commission., h addition developiient costs for off -site improvements per lot ditates the size and sell�ng 1>iice of the house. I might ad in.:regardy ,o tract :c 14 these, costs are verg'high resulting - 1 •„ , in unit selling prices .from. 4295,000.00 and up. We W-11 request that the Flanging Commission condition Tract 13674 to regmir e a minimum of 2,500 square feet mthnimum unit size. k. FOURTH, The wrought iron fencing along Amethyst. ,r The wrought iron will only be at the entraaCe areas of the deve]:ogeente all rear and side yards will be screened with a solid decorative , `r wall. In addition a white rail fence denoting the bridle tral.ulong. Amethyst will be required. We wish to assime each of -you that this project will be one that will further enhance the value of your .homes and will be cons "i.tant,:.;!th the quality oM the Zighborhood,: To further assure you that this is not ,just another developer false pro¢dise then City has conditioned this ! Tract 13674 so that, if a developer attempt to chatigt the quality he f WOULD NOT receive a building per; -'; t. u; I hove, this letter answers any queq; ions that you. may have, shr�uid - you need more information or Would' v� to confirm this better plea5e contaR+t Cindy ;aortas, planning dep �C�ty of Rancho Cucamonga at 9$9 -�.tdi or contact ate f, Riohard Dah3 t 987%8742. Regards, - a In MAY 2 6, B�L��S FROM. LENX DEVELOP 37 CORP.V TO; CITY OF 1114CHO CUCAM09A RElc =NCE: MTRTIVE TRACZ 1, 3t',7 T'RhTLS it WE AGREE TO .T' 1TAIN TROUGH CCfiRWS 6Ea AC (295 EHROiJGH ALL, LOCALE Q=STAZX -1 <;t TRAILS s`1t3D T14AT'FUTURE 'ACCE$''s Tj( TRAit `OF J `'TEiE,PRpPOSEA WPi1` THE PROPERTY WILL M PROVIDED IP�ki� WHEN PsROVpb M-1 BE 013TArit F?tOM fi= 1�OUI4TPi - , FLOOD CO:;TROt 1 1' # v 7.ENY n77LOP.4ENT CORP. ti or 10 a 4 0 I �� x,..76, z _ �� ,.'� ��• n -, - -. - .. _ _ . - w d May i6, z9$8 � ;�- � •''�'+ f} F�c -r` ..:� S'l�nr�ing`, Commissior� AN Rancho Cucamonga, "CA 91730 ` Der Sir °s grtadam The undersigxted sre "ifi redtivt of "Mr Richard' Dahl 's letter `dated The May 111 1963., in which addr�.';�nes oz;r conceifii regarding the Tentative Tract 13,674. After a personal meetin , with Mr Dahl. and as evidepoet3 in 'his letter he is willing to re e to a . re�uiremOf1t e the '' Planning; " c OCommisso:� as , a dond�tin for tl�e aprolnaS oz . Tntativa tract E ` 13174 to require a 'minim of 2500 � Sua,re "Teot of- living space�� for -,ach residence to- be uilt to said tract. After the meeting Oit-%.(Xr Dahl, it was obvious that the pX;ofused '4a a develcli;uent, would be ,of a caliber that proud enhance our neighboihood, ;and would nat hinder of _ gro sa tY values. w�ghe 'hndersigno pro�ef� r owners .adjas:ent "to• the proposed trA" (z.brse. 's' .zZ3 &i4, would 131se toe tar Dahl proposed d el�prpent� upon `the the Plahtiing ass rav(w Commission will 'I, ce ;1rre rccabl9 condition in the <cTa�;eloment "of the tract, 1 4« placing a minimum of 2500 squir`a fee�j,ef living space fo.r residence constructed on ary Wt?,,githt" dlv sion. this sub i � Sincerely, " EI • LO ' e rr xaraldR,E.Ie Ra c ^ l ' 5313 Amethyst Ave 631, 06 et s�t` Rancho Ou aq xa.a '�^j among 0A,- 1701 r tiq Gloria M. Miller ClIgA roa 5313 Amethyst Av 53$5. Amethyst A Rancho a . __ai R nch c+ R3a and W.. oth ., Ann Moth ` � ;� ,� ; 5333 Amethyst Ave 'r`' 5333 Amethyst Ave `r Rancho CUcamonga, CA 91 Rancho Cucam #nga­_, C;A 21701 ti 0 Y tL - z a t iV RESOLUTION NO.,. A- RESOLUTION OF TH9,PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPVOVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13674 r.: LOCATEO WEST OF AMETHYST STREET, 96RTH OF VALLEY VIEW IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENT!& (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) DISTRICT - , rr A. Recitals. 1 / (i) LePfk Development has filed an application for the. approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13674 as described in; =the title of this Resolution, Hereinafter in this Resolution the- subject °Tentative Tract i+�ip. request,,is referred to as "thepplicaiiand. ,, (it) On the 25td of May 1'988 the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed 'public how :,ing 'on the application anaconcluded said hearing cn that datet� r (iii) All legal prerequisites to the ad*g on of this Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolutions . NOV; THEREFORE, It is hereby, found, detim' indi and resolved by the Planning Commission of Ve, City of Rancho Cucamonga 4s follows: 1. This__Coaa'iissfon hereby specifica,Ily finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals Part.A of,this Resolution are true a co r . _ and r ect. 2. $ased upon substantial eviderte presented to -this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing-on May 25, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, . together:,;with public' testimony, this Cowission hereby► specifically finds as foll,,Gws: (a) The application applies to property located at West side of Amethyst, Nor of Valley View with a street fronts a of 666 feet and lot depth of 858.33 feet .and is presently unimproved, and 9 (b) The ,property to the north of the subjiect site is vacant and designated for flood control, purp'gs4s, the property to the south and east of that site consists of existing .single family residences and is designated for Very Low Residential (less than ,2 dwelling units per acre), and (c) The proposed subidi :`,ision design and accompanying maps have f beef reviewed by the Technical and Grading Committees and approved subject ,to te ,?nditions, contained 'within this resolution; and f id) That the proposed subdivision has minim um' and average'lot sizes of 20,070 and 23,872 square feet consistent with requirements of rok Very Lori,peasity. Residential District, and. RIO � n v` PLAMMING OWTSSIO RESqUTrott No. 1 1989, �.. Page c? (e) The related v'riance apptfic On variance ST -i has., been reviewed and a pp. roved by the Planning c *iss d acid (f) That there is ade ate space aY441labl£ on all lots for egAestrian use. 3, Based upon the substantial evidence: ,presented to this Commission during the - above - referenced public .hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above,, this Commissflh'hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is' cbnsistrii%,with .the General 'Plan,' Deva.Iopment Code, and sp fic s� plans; and 7 (b) '7lie design or improvements ,�af� the-11 tentstive � tract.:-is consistent with the General .Plan, Development Code; and,�;;ecific plans; and' Sc) The site is ,physically suitable for the.type of development,Ariopesed; and (d) The desipo of the subdivision is not likely to cause s< bstantial environmaital damage and �t avoidabl iruZ" to humans and wildlife or their Bab teat d (e) The te'ntat ee; t�ti 'is not likely to r.use Marlow public health problems; and (f) The d�;sign of the tentative tract will -not confli'�t WAh any easement acquired ,by the, r pubiicl, at large, '`now, of record,' for access thm-0 or use of the property within the propossd subdivision. 4., This Cotmpi is%n hereby finds-and certifies that the project has U ;, been reviewed and consife4ed in Compliance with the California Egviroomdntal Quality t;4t of 1970 anq; fvther, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. (, S. Based upon the findindr and conclusions set forth in'parajlraph 1, 2 and ,3 above,. this Commission hereby approves the app licationosubjel.t to each and every condition; set ;forth below and, in the attached. ta�dard. Conditions attached hereto and incarpiareted herein by this reference.It AML Ilay 25,0 1988 Page 3 f j. Tentative Tract (i) Final, {landscaefn�! ones irrigation plans for the parkway's ,jlong. Amthytt Street and and .for interior street planting shatli be submitted for review and I approval by the efty-Planner and City,�Tngineer ,prior to rFcordat art of ;the Final T'rapt ROO -. p ;: " (2) An in -lieu fie !'as contribution�l the future t undergrounding oni"the existing overhead rtti €sties (telecommunication, and electrical) on _ thel jopposite. side of Amethyst Street :5hali be dne 4alf,'the Ci ty adopted unft,am *t tiffs the length of ek,prd3ect,. fr4�1'td�?R - (3) An equestrian trail plan ' shall ,he prr5vided indi sating widths, ataxim m slopes, fencing and creed 53 controT in accordance with city equestrian *�raii standard drawfhgs# ,which slv�11 be su,0mitted for review and approval prior to recorotion of the Final Tract Map, and prior to appK 41 of street improvement and grtgding, plans . and,shat -1 the following; � _ a) Rrainage front, tit• north shall be carried when the equestrian trail easement in an intprstved structures...' , b) Equestrian 'hails with steep- grades., require" installation of permenent devices i .e. berried { :curbs "or treat -ed timber). c) 'ti- Permanent crossings to' lF�r access from grails to rear yards4ili be required. The crossing shall includd wood bridges concrete pipe, concrete'oox or other accepta0e design . d) gates should a provided for Each` lot to allow„ access; to loca4l trails. e) Two rail neater logs fencing should be used. instead of :split rail fencing for ,local trails. Fent.ing should ba' heated .on the inside of "trans only. (5) On/site drainage tji' be dires.Ie d westerly from t!1V a site shall be ftposed as follows in order of preference a`s' appriived the city, Engineer, "Building Official and San Urnardin'o Flood Control `bistrict whc appropriarte, i c PLANNING Ctk�fl 3S1� RE�91 t1]Itlt�.l14 _ - -- 2a, Page 4 ,= Aft ai Directed' southerly through the ' vacant lot, . u adjacent to the. sp-gth ,west corner of the site within an easemer-e_V ialToy Yfew Street,,." b3. Directly westerly within then sernardind County Flood Control _- metrict property, oiit- letting into Hellman Avonus� or jO Dir'ertly westerly within: the Son Bernardino Coun,,y Flood. Control District property 'klut- "existing " letting into the earth channel serving as an:voutflow From demans basin. fr (5) Trail and lot drainage eacist9ng; at iha `'South west corner shall be' conveyed to eiti�era a) The south through a privet* eas Ot to a point ' of,, "discharge to a public facility by a service frn:hovemeents ° maintained` by Homeowners - Association or; Bbl 'The, west: to" tilt, channel in : a surface improvement and maintained by agreement,,; executed with the Corty. In either case, absolute protection of southerly properties)- w e pro "vided" with channels, berms, walls or 'other acceptable r devices as determined in plan Check "based "upon the Q- -100 discharge, (7) The private drive shall be curved a he ^t1� within parcel 15 as riuch as passible to minimize freight of fill slopes. ` (B) Maintenance �f necessary of `off -site drainage fasiiities and the private drive (lot A) shall be in eluded_ within the projects CUR's. (9) 5idewa ,ks: *11 be installed on at least one sIda of the pr vie _ drive, t)esign Raviea� - f 3 All lot grading whether in conjunction with 4' total desiggn regrew application or individual custom lots, shall utilize grading techniques which Minimize the alteration to the natural landform , These "techniques Utlude 7 should minimal padding fdrunits only sptlit zevel foundations and/or steps wail ion. _� cansruc ,✓,. `0WN1W' COW19STO4,RES0LUTI0N NO. TT13674 -. t,ENK may -95, 190& page 5 t1 All trYil and park�:ay landscape improvements shall be constred and improved at the time of itreet construlpt a. (S) Details of�iie decorative masonry wall' adjacent to "Amethyst `Street shall be included iro the final landscape and irrigation plan, (4) Texturized paving shall be provfded at the drive entrys outside of the public right-of-way. (S) All side and rear, 21evL Lions of any pro poseC buildings shall be upgraead with .,architectural detailing. (6) MI Cross -lot drainage small be :ellminated by the use of be*s and swales on the lot or origin. r (7) All required drainage devices shall be improved to` F tho extent required based on hydrology and hydr -9ics supplied in Plan Check. (#) Additional grading., of front yards to eliminate f drainage pockets will be reou #red and rho extent of such grading shall be determined In Flan Check.' r, (9) No surface drainage will be allowed to crone, the, Coitaunity Trail or other public. improvements.: (10) As much on -site drainage as poscibla shall be ' directed to Avthyst Street. ; (11) The location and design. of any �eftiter fence /wall shall be raiiewred and approved by the Design Review Committee. 6. -Deputy . Secretary to this t"ission , shall certify to the j adoption of ,t s Rasolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS MR DAY OF MAY, ' 988< PLANNING COMISSiON Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMlONGA arry T. Miel, Chairman ATTEST_ `" rah Buller egr+`ecre Dry G L N ' kit i�„c pt A 11'k CE a PIN A!.Ar- .< _y ;SIC All a v Vo sit opt u Fyy.�� 44 ppp ��jyyy,�p • UJ 1 42 fi i°_ is M f i *� r� tot m s$iYr`�r"gr"Km g 4a +L: wr l4 GG i �f' L K yy,. y 2 3: N; LLLLLL � Nbd¢� i� `d: N M Y i ���Jj t=- yy'_'12..v.� �-( w���. .-- �«......._ #����e''--- .,#��+ +!t M/ M 3i�A Yqp Y^ ~�i�..`'b iL"�tY4 O 0�"'��~�i i�1T~ �■ Y+� Y1 �pd' r'(1 i O Y sill .. X9p pr jr M $ y p lit 1% Ev 1 fl 1► u v Em IN it -UM Fel-S Ij o M eti "Nw `+ Y Zr ^ ^ a A s : age }..�gj �w 'e rl l81t� �.' dtr w. v its- Ymt a .f Y ` C^ VN OIY C M 4r9.w if I FNw 4 w �'• <g ►:c i� has r'" 4"'S3A � 3S.maw w ki, 9 d�w Ir PI � r , � Ef LLL wzl- Sivoolt "J N , = l An . �'° 0 Id 14 In MA ;.j I .-» :.. !rte 4 �'M`a ►-w +C Cr .... � .� �re. 04 4a tit TL t 4 TL ikki Jill Sg lyeH r fu ., Ic u a ®I at d IF t is _ r' eypEp 3 +T's+3L'$ ed bil- r s � o ! tali f; y� yy� ��yy1� y y IL 14i Y fifg •, -�:�. N lug fit 10. fjj ski A it �${ } 2133 P3 fill i 3", j tin 4G .' +M M� ~ y g"a a aI Ra V ��� ri aaw ra q� S U t A e'ri K 4% vi Ova w+ _,..w.�..C$L�}�+s'i.� � •� � �`�`, i. �Rt�•�, +4 is far+ .. tt. t'- f If $� 'Ml R aw.. y ` ,q�R Tx VS '� b iy7r , � � •�l _..,, a;1'Ii ,y yam �a±E Hit, 'v ...�el ym�. 9p�ry,y' 9g4'•s*, qg� {gym °M��st •_.y"t.J , rY, i. tay i AKA %7 N. •b j _'.9' p,yJ ; to LLL qK w•'`+Rq 'C,$ aM ,p0, '� 1t° Y�w"�'a°�rlj' \^,�, -. -: of tLS i�i.� N1y '`J''I xM •.:a 4 tS �. �... B as sa .. � •��, t � .s.+rrii i „� "" 'fir r� r a J2'iu. n$'� r � _ }L,1�Yr,,, y VFa L$» f� O Q N�, 81 -16 SAO .$^ li b _ cu al sg j Rig Q! 1 �J 1� lit �,. it ti gC� Mil laz �3Y� 1C UPO Z q f� i1KCi » :3 tll I ^`i —ILL 1-Y '4L � , � • .. � J li ' +] f� S11i—����Y4L psi U. a t &-i 1. � IN I 111 K� I it 1H g i IX ^ It, ,a M �E � , +ae++ �4�,,,: ;�,s a ■ Y LO N.al i , ^k f� I ; rM�4 w �LdL 'Nqq l t ^W NNC:f aLi$ ^n \�, K all �6t�tlU4s4 fk.,pypyGG�[G``. yyL \ ,4i r { 9 41 N y Rv Q a S' IS VJ P� j of i C �+ ca tv t OI ` J s ` ow to A' $ O1 o• s n ,r ��L' 1 _ 4Y'Q a ^awca may_' un ,�U.Li''�v "e S z� v__ 7 G L. L. AMY tea- 3yirV i�d,' I'*Q1 1�, u "ei" pa.0 agm s8�3 'F i2 .a$n 11XYii is Ly MK �H i mC 8e.a _$ $ "" °y �{p ^�{ U ', p:1: '' '1: ii ad+ a1 +L7 _yyL�- l �Aroi. YL" -M 1. C. nCw; �T� y �� mry d`i'q�pM '�a � {�����' ate• y ` Yy g! "' {{�� Cq� q�{}� NM]i^ $W ii- 6$ `pow 9 r. tll'tl 4'.r t!1 H *I .:..'mod. Q9� �ti1 A ,M v .i R a +: rx a jk f WFF REPORT ` .. 0 PATE: 196$ T0; Chauvin and &"bean of, the Planning comissiort ev PROW Brio 8,014t°g city nne ,L� BY. clrrthia Kinser,,} A%,.Is attt Pjinne:r ttAAL AMSESSMENT ANtk CONDITIONAL USE PERKT 00 2704 ., Irr u ng con ra rs 70 ce in Tears space "of 2411) , Odart 11 At withiA an existing multi - tenant industrial : i = cent4r iii t Genor-al 104uttrial Ofstriet (,9j rarea I s locatas€ at NSA Arejesk utie APN* 900.04,19. rz_ s G _ d> PAWMT I+<i#yP v7 A. ktion Re ues ot,-- "'AppmvAl of, a note -c ns'trg#lon r4fiditional, use, Fe a`> lisft A twildinq contracars offi�ca•withIn art existf ti-tewt irdustrfaT center Toe:a" d at ' ST�,:Af:^b t ' Raul e,i+. B.: Surroundin Late Ilse and zonin , TiQ=" ,ar t e"arul.Park# f?dfut Density Residential �t�'14,d TTing tanits Fer acre) South - , Yacan 1:4ustriaT BuiTdin s Gonetr~aT lndurtkal': Eett vacant, lw.dtrs rial IO0ldit'@s3 Seneral Industrial Nest ' Industrfa Bt±ilifiltgsta 4 T. r , n8 a \4 ir�{usiri ,; r C. "teral Fxarr ftsf nations: ra ec nrsra rastrial �1 � tkrr t a :1 cii►�w kser€s;tt' ewiderttial (8- *14 dwOling :units ger $fir •= <' ner T Indust ifal East ' Gene, a, indust6al r Vest "General industrial ! 1). Site haractoristics: The prrvposed; use; is located within an existing-- tit enan industrial center, whfd is primari y ��cant. r' ;t r, ,K: tf C3 kANNI�iG C ISS�04, STAFF "REPORT ry . -17 ° ARC BERRY- CONSTRUCTION Y< May Page 2 C. .Parking Calculations: " Humber of Number of Type Square Parking <, r1papes, 'Spaces of Use 600Cage Rates, R-e iredi __.Provided - • Proposed Building' Cozrt�a .1tor's Office 2,2I0 3/250 9 „9 A ; Vacant 25,390 s /.400 ' `. 63 67' TOTALS 72 76 o ,F. nApolicabie 'Remo The Industrial, Specific Pi an Uubarea ` T allow builc'ing con ractors offices, subject t# the approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the-PlanOng.6mmftsion. IY. ANAL'fSIS: '` , A Gene7al,: The proposed building contractors off��e will aperat 'Through Friday from 8:00 A.14. �to 5 :rr�� .M. (see Exhibi� This site will be used for office purposes only. There will be no storage on -site. - B. Issues: >aTne primary „issues relsted to locating this type of us' a within an'a industrial setting- are' '.compat`ibi'lity with surrounding•businesses and parking availability. The majority of the center I - � ;urrent'ia vacant. Compatibility with . surrounding bus 6iss�gs, hOweYer, iy` "ho; expected to be a problem because of tik office nature of thc' use. The Development Code requires one j1 aPk�ing space per 2f0 square ^J feet of building area:; This results in a requiro'irtt for 9 parking spaces. The current on -site parking tai r spaces :'for this unit would therefore be adequate to accoeim66 e the use. Jhe Foothill Fire protection', District has .reviewed .:this applicatidn and has no nt'(see Exhi6it_"B19 r'r 'FINDIN III. ;FACTS FOR GS: v i. 111at` the proposed use is in accordance with the de�heral Flan, a the objectives of thA Devvelopment Code, and the 'purposes of the Industrial r Specific Plan' Subarea in 'which the site is Iocaten, 11 ;� 2. That t6o 'proposed ose- wild not be detrimental to the public ' health, safeyy, or ;Kelfare or materially ^ '. to properties or, improvements in the tsici:nity, r 3. That. the proposed use_ -5 t 11es with` eao�s • ofr t P, applltA a -„ isrovisions gf the Industrial Specific,p7t&, l; r. V77.7,�, PLARNW; CMtS$.ION OFF REPORT CUV 818-1-7 OE Page .3 :d a4 Conditional 'Use Permit Application +tauld like to °' locatt within the All 0 s wish to allow YVrc Berry, ownf-_!!4 —� otion. to locate him hiiaa" ..a....r -- _. ___ __J r_..,av�. uaa$r Gale cans:it onaily Mop geraiited saes for Sub .Area. 2; this would fall under the category of Building Contractors office. The tenant would like to lease approximately 2,21Q square feet within our project. As YOU can see ,.from the attached tenant improvement plan, the improvements required aM very similar to those of a standard light i;ndustrld," peratior.. Marc ]Barry is ,,a long time resident of the cih� of Rancho _Cucamonga and has been' affiliated with Barry (C construction, a _ �'t Ito j, also active in P,ancho j Cucamonga over thJ�st JJ veral operation for ss Years..; The hears 'of l follows. %� `= -- Construction will be as Monday through, Friday: B:OQ a.m. – 5:00 P.M.o Closed Saturday & Sunday i Marc has chosen to locate in ouv project far'a number.-Of reasons. Primarily, our 'location offeru him close proximity to his currant projects in Rancho Cucamonga. Secondly, the ad _�:ess.affordedby vineyard and Arrow Route are also necessary to his business. r Ailk. � 16912 -A Yon Karnan Avenue, Wne, CA 92714 714/474 -1304 i a Sa o s a®o tee* 00 if 111,19 20 $' ,41 slmo,'R3 , i $ - ,� 'f . lilt i ,p 1 ,l t, e i r t . • i 1 � tin It 'i�� xri lilt!f � - AR OW cbu81NE3$. PpRK -OvwW F.« q F.scucwoilu aAliveawn wr .....w..««.Q..... �;.«..� e A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA14ONGA PLARNING COFiissiou t� APPROVIN CON01TIOM USE PERN(T NO. 88-17 FOR A BUILDING RACTOWS OFFICE L., ATED, AT 9057 AR ROUTE, SUITE � l 0. IN THE GENERAL iNWSTRIA,,L OISTP.ICI" (SUBAREA 2) APR: 209- 012 -I9 .: kecitais. fiD Marc wry Construction has filed an a lication for the issuance of the Conditional Use„ Perrrtit No. 88:17 as de ed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, subject Conditional Use Permit requost is refereed to as "the application% (ii)-,On the k.of'Mayr, 1488, the plans4ing Cowission of the City o 4 Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed , lic hearing on the,,appiIcation and concluded said hearing on that date. tiara accu(III) A aT Prtyi4uitltes to th=e adoption of this Resolution ft, c� B. Resolution, MOW. THEREO(k, it is hereby, found, det "fined and resolver %� the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1, This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. Based upon s" ystartial evide'nct presented to thin coiCiaissinn during the�abovo- referenced pub is hearing on May 25, 1988, including written and oral staff repov -4, together with public testimony, thin Comeissiorr hereby specifically finds: as follows4--r The applao applies to property located at 9057 Arrow Route (Suite 100 ) and b M The property to the north of the subject site is apartments and 0ear Gulch Park, the property to the sQUth of that site Uonsists of industrial building and vacant land, the property► to the east is industrial buildings, and the property to the west is industrial t il4fnm 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upan the spseiftc findings of facts set forth in paragraph l and 2 above, this Comission hereby finds and concludes as follows. (a) That the proposed use lr�In accord with the General Plan, the objectives ''of the Developmant Code, and the purposes.,of the district in which, the site is located. G 41 PLANNItk 60MISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 88 -17 WC BERRY' CONSTRUCTION' 4 Nay 25, 1988' Page 2 ^ r �{ (b) That . the proposed , uqe, W96 with the conditions applicable therato,', will not be detrimental to the 1iuhl is tLial ��h, safetyw or welfare, or %tterially 1njur0U40,'.to properties "or improvemen ,� in the vicinity. ` (c.1 V;at the pro'o I d us tom lies with each of the pp pp 'af Lhe Development Dade. applicable rav ,ion ,I I , I 4. This CoW ssionIhe 4 finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered to cal Iii with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, \t is C rissiorf hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the. findings: and corlClusioth$ set forth 'in paragraph I,` 2 and 3 above, this;Co�amission heroby approves ,the application subject to each and every conditIart set forth llelcw and, the attachied Standard Conditions attached her6to and incorporaaed herein by this reference. ('11 Approval of this request 5,hall not waive compliance with all sections of the 1. flidustrial "Area Specific Plan, and gall other tit Otdfnances. (2) If the optration of the'Ifaci'd y causes adverse effects upon adjacent. Wsinesses or operations, inclu0nq, but Trot limited to noise, the Conditional Il ° ,hy Use Perari°t shall be brovlght before the Planning Commission for the^ con:kideration and oossible 1 termination of the uap. " c M Any signs propcsed for the facility shall be°.- t designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign F Ordinance, any t1nif&* Sip�n Rr�ograar for Ithe complex, and shall regriire rent ' and apps ,�rai by the Planning Division prior I nstailatioA.; c 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the ! adoption of this Resolution.. APPROVED! AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF KkY' 1.98. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY' OF RRNdo C! C_A�WECA BY: \ } Larry T., e , . na rman ATTEST; ra a er, pu y rcre ary o � q k f PLANAI-4G CORUSSION RESOLUTION NO. ° w CUP 88-17 BE RY CONSTRUCTION � i; I, Brad Buller, Deputy 5ecestary of the Planning Comissidn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do haraby certify that the foregoing Resolutiolf ws"dulyand regularly_ introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning 'lC tssio;!,, of • tha City of Rancho Cucaoon, at a regular vteting�f the Planning Co held ga eiq*lon on the 25th day of tray, IM,, by the followi'i vote -to -wit: AYEs - COM4ISSIQWERS; o' \ NOES: COMMISSIONERS. WENT.* COMMISSIONERS: u 0 5 _ l Iii f r; ii i e To \\ i „ Q .. CIr € F £�AbICFIQ CiTc £3$Gt c may 25, 1988 t Chairman and &Odle s of the Planning Comafssjon FgOFxa Brad 6411er�3City;,Plannsr _ i BY: Debrs Meier, Associate Planner S+3BdfGl : l+ aFFCATStlN '0 C(}illxI'itUTAL U5E PERXIT 86 -13 ° MAURY r reques or a ex ns ar , N e use Q our aporary OffCe trailers d sib containing :, existing 101000 square fcoV t'i ria`l� facility on i.0 acre of land in the 6enerat �nd+as ri &l District (Subaru 3) located at 814 +leims ,Avenue - ,APga s' I. PROJECT Alltt SITE A6SCRIPiION: t4; h A. Action At ested: Approval.cf 44,18 jimtwtif ez.ognsfoft tcn t e prow s ons.,a the Gondi"tional Uie "Peraft, O. 6ani_egrr :ndi The original Coff4itlonai Use #emit was is graved , g 1886. At the time of that approve;, the ?�anning Carpmission had etprOMO toncern with to arary trailers Decease in pravf �; cases, anticipated site improvoents,n "er ber a a .reality , the roovel of the trailers i ecaare a difficult code enfgitement issue. The nissian directed the` City Attorney to pre re an Ag t bet*en the City and !Maury Microwave that�11 Id i "Is re timely ""Vail of ,he � trailers, AV the proper yyi . That Agr+a�ent was a royod 4y -,. the City Col,arcil and recorded on August 134 1! is, attached as Exhibit A. r Xoz C,erreral:. , The Conditions of Approval essentially c%Vr,.io My's—ST action 114COSsary hy,,Maury Microwave in order to cosrplyU Stith the provisions of the �"�#r�val. 'lire f1r'sntr step was tyre �__ subMrit iT of a l>n olopaxsnt Re d APplication for Phase 1 development by . fr(yK 9, 'J987. W'-iW, secAAd step was a actual , constructica srz at the n fifth ; oOuld be Octtt�ti� by duly 1988 and the trailers ;could j�Yl be reeved. The Develop rrt Rev o applicatioh and reces�ary frees *V suWkIt#,ed, by ju, 1%7 however, 44,* to unforeseen delays 64 applj,�atigA "Was nOt c%Plete nor accepted f-or procassirr until 04®y'7888, Consequently, construction of the expanded facility and wail e the trailers will riot be accomplished 'by the daly 1M Pf ANYINt1 C USION STAFF REPORT TR 11iTCNi L V E POW 86-,13 - NALMY yIGAtiWAVE 11ayc >"cri, 19m' J page 2 deadlines, The,, vet gh pmnt Review application i it sshedul� for Oesign R�C�, ,r June ,2, 19 With Planning Commission coiside ation dot #offing in loe jpi —;fcrr early<.July. StAff believa that .he applicant id diIfger3"tiy purstdhg, #pproval ,-nd u construCt rn. of permanent space in or6er to remove the trailers. 'The applicant' esti tes -that vconstruction will be _ covleted o the end of July, �a. the modification' to ,Resolution 8S -g5, is successful - an afiendment to .the agreement between-the City and Maury Microwave ' must also be executed, wip ¢he,appr�ovaj,ly e Ctty�Cou il., III.'YFA6 NSs he proposed OR PINR7 : extension, fO tfi.usefof the, i�porarY'-- off Tc� frailers'.Is, consistent with thj ",tent!al plant A"d the Industrial Specific oPl'an. The use, together wito rear nded' `Y Conditions 0 "$} rava'i, °wi11 not be detrimdhtal ` t6. th e public health, safety: on weli'�3re :ct� mAt4rfial iy in3urioois to ^ a iopertiest,cr - improvements in the aK�& Tye t*porary trailers compply,ae�itlr all apPlicpble pr►visons of 13evelo}lr:tvde. o 0 . n IV. CORRESPONCENC This item..has been advertised Ili "I Pub Hearing n , ie -"MYia "fie ert newspapor, the property posted, and naices • serve to a grope y ownets wi 'n MOtfeet of the site:. t Y. REC(vt� WATION- Siff recd mem that the P ann((ng Csim�;:r, ion 3 approve a 13`monttp; ime exte' s an t�; Condition 1 U permit Si »13 through s peon nf` the attached Resolt�tfnn and wor4ditlonsf ApprnVa < t G' Res o�:fly ixtEii,� or a J City Planner b8: DR: js is I Atta* ^tents: Ex3;ibit "A" ,Agreeme nt. between Gity and Miury ;Micrnwave , Exhibit "8" - Letter fr.m MiuryiMicro"ve for,oratido ` Exhi6fi "C" Existing Site Plai). ; Resolujon pf Approval, 4. a a yyp _ 0 V DEVELOPER 4reby t�eC #ara thei�� s�c�tantw —That � coNer�nts� any+ restrictions a�. sot! f6th herein sha11` be deemed; during- the' tort, of this' AML Agreement to bt Taven its running with the , #and and shalt a Ito and be . _ binding upon the DEi►E UPF.R`s � Sdrs and ,assign$ i title or in restto YY the subject prPperty. CITY and divao'PIR herebi. decier t'ae' r understand ng and intent th t`�.the bellofit and bur�ien'o � ;y 4 W COVeft t sd reste�idtions set. forth herein takch an gonc l'M the lsubjocti properV "ia `that the DEVELOPER'S legaki into is r nderec °less valuable whiiN'„ $he henefit ,is t� enjoyed by theejeneM peib3fc by f rthering too 96blic, purposes f� which the „a dovelbpment standards of the dity „Qf Roth* CUM#;'IInga have been adopt ®. 1 E Each and every „'- Mtract*- deed or in5trusent �atecuted dueing Viet term Of this Agreement which purports to COW i) 1COMY the zubjact- p�opercy shall 7be'coractusivaly held to »avt. been exru$adr del jvet"od' and acct subject-4o the ;2evenants and restriatianssGa£ rmsscet in ^this Ilgreemes�x, regawdie�s of z Q whether:; such covenants and restrict' 5 are set: forth " "in $0qh contract, deed or other instrument.} talon 5. Recording and Filing,* r As a ; specific c(M411 00 prtor to the instal-loidn and °occupae(;cy. -of the temporary erailrs, the DE1�.19PtiR sha11 pause this Arran and apy amtmdments or supplenenUa iMreto'tQ _* recorded and filed in conj4nctian wi the sub �iyect property` --Ith 'the, of#fce Of the County Recorder, County of saes ` oernardino. " The DEVELOPER sha21 pay al l fees and chargos - incurred rj�� (connection with such recording and, filing. Additiuna #ly, 06 "DEVELOPER shall prMde to the CITY” a CO"fOrOOd Copy of this Agreement as recorded prior to the installation and ,occupapcy oix the temporary traiiere. Q o spa .. -'� -.. _. ... _. � � ='. �.l'+-^ n -..,� `, �._•. .'..� IN. WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY and the DEVELOPER have executed this Aga gnatures. Dated: CITY OF RAMC CUCA14ONek 1� uren asserman, city Manager,, Dates: OpVELOPER By: or Or .. aury, r , Fre5fdent Raury �ticrowave,Corporation STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BE:RNARDINO. ) On this d day of — 1486, before me, the E undersigned, a`Wotary u c in and ,ai „a e, parsonaily appeared LAUREN II W,RSSERMAN, known,;to me to -be the City Manager of the City of, Rancho Cucamonga, I a municipal corporation,'ano,said.persan is know to me-to,be the person who executed the within instrument`on behalf of the City; of Rancho Cuumongasand acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cudimongo executed the same. WETNESS my hand and official seal. OF6�ICI4L SRAL JANlM C Rk^fOLDS / NBTALT PUM4 a CALWORMA se V_"0 p MUM ry u c in nQ for said a e Nv =M AW A. 1"I STATE OF CALIFORNIA Us. COUNTY OF SAN C,7R91 MIND 1 I On this 30th day of July 1066, before, me, the undersigned, a Notary P0517c in and fir: ,a a e, per�onal3y appeared MARIO A. Maury, JR., know t6 me to ba the President of the corporation that executed the within Instrument and known to me to be the person a:o executed the within { Instrument on behalf of the corporation execued the - within instrument pursuant, to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. THELMA Lt. G!NDY N6#RREi! Notary1public rt an s 5tate r+5.wavrPubuc•CAaWORM Thelma Lu ,,, •;:, FR;k�eAt, -.yr Cindy N, arre2l, ace of California ES+C.ars�, E�, SgtL 30.1!!Y U • a A. U P o', " WAY :: j SASQii t pf liYE �Gt�GSNf4NC 4C L1FCl �QfA 173p 0 TeL 1714) "7.47tS rWX]010 �WI40.c S } xu, Apxil 22. 1908 ; If . La�Y McNiel � � Cha$xxan and X"bers °of ;:,.•_`' The "Planning Commission �^ City of Rancho Cucamon P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga; CA 11730; Subjects Modific?stion of Reasjiution 40, 86 -95, dated July 9, 198$'' �etween Maury M s;rowava. corporation mend the City of Rancho Cucamonga es it condition ofOcohditioni -a Yat Feria t No. 86113 . Ozer M,r, McNiel: 1, S The Purpose of this ; Setter in to t!qurst `an "emteneia� to the above sulo ject $greeaIIeAt a;lifiwilig Maury t `rtlFt 3xF, i Corporation to peep the /4) 'tee -> �rarx trailers• on tour Property until Ntiaem 20 ij89 at which tia&e oux expapaion'Project Is scheduled to be completed. We- roa:lixe this request is cunt rfrF to the intent; of the sgreea t, £to4tvery ; at the onset we felt that we would be able to complete the expansion well; within the alloted "tuna sal now skx the ds,41ine opproachts, we finer that we have underestimated, the time rtquired`to"put tpgethr-r this project, - Due to critical govPs -Atnt aO Other cantr$et< sche3uiee we were dalrsyed in . addressing time project until 6y 197. '-At this time, exploratory discuOsiottm wem held with PlennerIMbr#,$eJer, and then in June a more,, demiled a'eti* was head with, 'Yx,:' D*n 'Wtm- - Tide, purpose of these convera3atIons was to setter: undtitt�md the.' building.proceass, D4ritg the South of aunt we -aimed begeat the serra'a for a' copatalc first that could han4lle bath design and t6nstruction of our project, in September, 1982 we stlected Bezxy Construttion Company and .gut tki under contract t4 design the firast phase of the project (se§ attached schedule dated August 27, 19a7 and MMC "P, 0, 206951, dited.October 9, 198f and due, six weeks A44). To date we have found. the proceags of site design score difficult snot time conuiiming than tae snticipated� This coupled with the lass. of Mr. Cet7u Leonardi of 15trry Construction as the aaaaigtted architect in Janaury, 1988 Was a fadtor in the loss of nontinui.ty and,tt:e apred at whxtia the pro jest has progressed. Over the past eight saouth>sa we have had :considtrable contact with members of the planning do-pa tmartt and ,tiieve submitted various site planes for comment'gnd review to dettraaine the design criteria ea table to i,. city, `; , a A+7R79 rxiha�e�y� 51�Lx@X at �%P.kO" Ra cceatc raarxaxr } �R#:iL7R7tl7C#4'x` Cf]i � N :�tSRkt #Ott}T;tNdRt " � ACtlf !vt c i ti •• Larry MCINiel< April 22, 1986 Page 2 N tip :'t W Greg Gage the planner on this project, and Fir. Brad Dueller, the -City Pianaer, have been very helpful in guiding us thru h ttie rout ug eqrecatione of city cotes; goli.cieer 04d preferences. The lose 0 �'...�� our trailers aft our site will pose a c6itezabl�, h��tdp 1 on bur buiiness, " The tr�ailexa . Mouse our Sales Department,'- tarketi�nQ ` ' Services Department and Eng$.nsqring Department; Giese trap leis house j� networked computer sysipas,_computeziged publishing systema, mnd-t"reiatdd systems, national. ahLInternational $ax and teletype equipai4t end also an electronic phone eye, j As you can appxeriate, the movement oft sita. o�eavate will represent cansdtrable cost. More 3mpo lye lass of ei.Ltice2 personnel, immediately adjacent to the day day operation 3t. the btteiriese repxesente imseasussble loss of time ar3 daciahay a" therefore considerably higher pperating costs. `. Also, the rel6catioa of perssoanel and equipment wilf consume valuably;, managerial time that ae gjtr ill afford to", lose. Within a year s( will ti' forced to dvplieatet this, same effort. ' We are presently scheduled to file our formal technical design review applieaiioa by April 27, 1988. We hope that through our efforts 4 the support'of the Planning Department -th&A tae have arrived at an aoee tOle de4o.. - W�e'have recently. placed P 0, 2DS355` ,(atteched) fv.0 regwements that were rot' .orlj3jslly prov;ded for by Berry in their Phase T estimates. °'tie currenC construn%on schedule auhsitted 'to us by Berry on gr11 13 (attached) cleiarly 3ndicatas t thine project will not complete uu#,il Judy a 1989, the, rt wd arm roquestiog this mod cation to.our - agrtieisant. We deem i , p:;udent to add on aa,,,additionsl four mol 'I to the proposed schedule` to take into �sccount jmmtitipated 'delaye;, We have put a great deal'bf time, effort and money into this pro,e_t_ and it feel'ssamewtuct di:s yed with, our s?ow progress. We assure you �t w ate, dedicated to the earliest, conspletion porsslbla�while at the ease time building a facility of original design and character within the city guide lin�6 that will sake us and :the community prdbd. Wet theteforea tiquest that Section 3, Pala, 2,_,of Resolution IM7. 86-95 be modif.tid to read: "The. temporary office trailers will be permitted until suoh tae as 1?haae l' Is compieted or November 26,.1989, whicheerx coves first*" a �i r. y� sm 8dy n aF PFtn' 13, 5988 A: PHASE I.-, 1.. Subvittal J?r4wlngs (sul=it to City) l� 04/27ASS, 2. Revise and ,Dmsutmit Start Atructural Pzeli\ �% ( pS/yy g 45/12/08 3. Full Suhmit'ta7 ' 4., Ccaplete Preliminary Bid PackageQ6/03/88 ` S. Ouaran' 'A b%xbmi , Cam; { '�D 06/17/88 6. Commissim. Jw cvral "i 07/13,/88 (f � S. PHASE Its 1. Prepare %briting P-6/20AM c 2. Owner App=va3 ` 08A 3. SWafti to Building &,Sa€etlr 4. Plan Check: (S eks ) 10/27AS 5. Corrections to;Plan Check (l k) tT X0/88 6. Resubmit to Building & Sa£tty I. rLnal Appwml (6 Ixwm) a lir2• 8 -A ` .,. C. PHASE 1111 1. Bid / Iy/186 2. Start Construction 3 '' alet§ Construction (34 reeks) 07/26/93 SMJSt?[ILE BASZO 014 ,tx',S APM'.NAI, 2O STAM Si MINI i?RAL'+?I M PRIOR `il? FIM RPR'VM OF PLADMI G C S,,� M. CC: � � 1L Pld%C HCXXB, -Brian Blo=, Chuck wells, gS L' ­_T" ` 4 � r . +ter ...... .. _ 71 .. I .ttf5 _ .+_r _ �w//ja� w..a;, � .,.'. ;� _ iE f •�M� q �� _ � YKOivCLCPtO ji ?.grotto �w �3- i Mi•r,.�..�,f ... ' OiiYSTIMG. IO:WIYG 18.00D.$4. FT. - - -- ^- ice.,.,_. 1 , •'t «....= .. 'D =FICC 7RAIlE4 12NLDFT, 1.4 PEON,E. ASSEtSLT 7KAll[0. 12NLgfi, 4 -5 /'� _ 1 3## t V.MINEWN'. TRAILCR C CONFERENCE Am 12.400}, 4 Ai0lLE. -� '"' t 11 �, V!11!!Y[LOMEO fff 0 SCUM PARKING AAEA is SPACES (IMCLOOE 4- Y1S1MR S1AttS.) _ I C _ tl 0,6- PA c- AAtA 44 SFACL[. ; : • r .�. _ f U? .AT[SIAL STDRACE COMTAIMt1I, i t I I� I J- CITY Cv, rrENt. alA I , F,.aCtk NIM DWIS � , H:�ltt'x G - _�} �„g� A°"�r t i RESOLUTION SID.. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAM64s.r" HSt O�IMi I{3;d= _. -- -.- _ ;r""tTi3G.► »�£it�fii"ttCONOIiI4NAf. _U�Rl3fT tJq« 864 FOR AN W-MOR71 TIME EXTENSION FOR THE USE OF TwORARX OFFICE TRAILERS LOCATED AT ano Jim Wpm IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT - APR; 209 - 022 -I0 u' A.,� Recitals. �S c () Maury Mfcnwave Corporatioa has filed an ,application for the modification of Conditional use,PfrMit No. 86,-",as described iR the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter In this Reskution��he subject donditiona Use Permit request is referred to, as ' "the application". Qi) %.ion the Mh Of May, -IM* the Planning�cmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted aAuly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said, hearing org at date. f= (Iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. S. Ra ution. ) 1i01i, THEREFORE, is hereby found, determined 1 nd resolved by the Pinning CommissfOn of the rty of Rancho CucamorgA as fol ows. -,. i 1. Uis Commission hereby ficirjy finds that a�,'of thelacts set forth in ,le Recitals, Fart A, of this Resolution are true and correct., 2. Based upon substantial evi'Gente presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on Maas 25th, ID88, including written and oral staff reports, tagjthew ' with public testimony, this commission hereby specifically finds as i �isws: la)" The application, bas conti�juaiiy pursued plans for future development of the site but has encountered previously unanticipated delklrs in t4at schedule, and _ fb)' An application for development has been submitted tC��hb City and is now comp'tete and acceptable for processing through tee ReMoitoent, Review process. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence Ares fed to this Comission ,during the above�reffk.renced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set .forth in paragFiph 1 and 2 above, this Coamrission hereby finds and concludes: as follows s (a) That the proposed use cis in accord with the General, Plan, the objectives of the Development f t Code, ai_l the purposes of the district in whio.+ the site is located, PLANNINGGOb issiam RESOLUTION.N0. CON4ITIOkAL USE PERMIT 86,13 y ?l Ftm1URY MTCROftAYE may 25, 1988 , Page 2 _ (b. 'That the proposed dse, together with ­wie conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or /f welfa e; or materially injurious to propertfies i or., IW)! avements in the viciq, . {�J �� j / ) ThatAtlhe Frnoosed use comp &s with each of ire Iapplicablt� provisio+, of the Oaxeapment Cade,, 4. This Commisston'herti , y Minds and certifies that the pwaj t has been reviewed and considered in ccanpfiance with the California Enviros total " Ovality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issued a Negative Declaration on July 9, 1986. 0 S. . Based upon the findings and conclu'siona: set forth in ' ragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approve, tbt' modificatinA to Resolution No. 66 -95 by amending Section 3, Condition 2, ta''read a$'foll,rws: . The temporary office trailers will be pumItted until such Vje a,.y Phase I is ccrol eted oK,18 months, whichef? *,r comes first. This condition shall be formalized amendment to the agreement between the City, of Rancho Cucamonga and Maury Microwave Corpo;ratiod. All other applicable conditions of Resolution Na„ 86•45 remain in effect. T 6. The - Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25T1t ]DAY O "Y, 2988. PLANNING.COMMISSIOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arty T. WcN1e7,, Clia i rman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Depuly secretary t I Brad Roller, Deputy Secretary of the Ptanning Commifision o€ the City of, Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that tta. folagoing Retj�tiun was duly and regul -- ly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning ;,, owdission of the City o. Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning:Comwfssier,�held on the 25th day of May 198B, by the fallowing vote -to grit: G AYES,. C"ISSTONERS: NOES: COttihiISSIOVERS: ASSENT: CW!ISSIONERS, "� �� Ilk; -- =�--�- = ---- 61TY OF RANCHO) CUCAMONGA �� F 7 PORT DATE: 25'.1988 TO: Chairman and kembers,of the Plannfgg Coemissido FROM: Brad Buller, City planner' BY: Debra Meier, Associatet?lanner SUBJECT: ENVIRONl�iENTAL , ` SESSM€NT }AND dB�IERAL k At4ENDMCRT 88,O {C CITY a se �n 'amends mEn�' ' e�peEi o ow ng par,cels within the': Victoria Com unity Plan al ,lfroa� Loa -Nedf (44 dwelling un is = per acre) to Low (24 dwell,�ng units per acre) -;,APN. -44 411 -?$t: from,-Mdfui, 1 -14 dwelling un ;s per acre) to Lf'hht l a m 4T- t91 -9 (6Med'Wa, I s t 49'9` 5O from A;4r i (844 dwelling, units',, pe acre� t4 Medium -Nh (1424 dwel ling units 'per acre) - APP): 217- 091 -18 c rr-ugh 22, 25, 43, frow Hedlm, (8 -14 .Awellj n9, j units per acrej to Low - !*diem 14- 8- dwelling units or acre) ,.� APR: 227- 11,1 -1, 33, 38; and from Neighbcfh Come h11 to Xedis�rResfdeniia1 0 -14 diaelling.ur,wst, acre) I. ABSTRACT.- The Planning �4mmission recently reviewed an .�enoent Victoria. C snit Plan IVCPA 58-021 rhich annexed, 'el Oven areas' in and around Victoria into the Cowuhity Plan boundary. 11 The purpose of this P;licsal Plan Amendment ,s tq coordtPate the Ge40ral'l � Plan Designation with the t�dmxended- Victoria Land U e Desi n�, on for each of t:; areas in question. ' c- s, g ti I3. ANALYSIS: Of the etxven areas annexed into the Victoria cowinity 553ary:, five require,--,A General Plan Land Use revision to reflect the r,RcotMieF:3ed Victoria Land Use Designation.' Those areas are de% ,';bed bal oar: -Area A Windrows P�''anning Area. (Exhibit A) owended Victoria Land Use: Low - Residential (2-4 dwelftng units R acre).` - Action Iequired Awed the land Use Hag ai" t9ae dal Flan tram Low- PRedium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per sore) # (2 -4 t' - dwelling units per Acre). T Thiso parcel Is "the site of the , existing Casaletti 'Polkl' jI' Palice, Surrounding development is a Law Residential (2 -4 ,• welltl�s units ° ner acre) project of single family detached homes � the I� rdan5 }. I. G �. aid? %.�..YS�'',P.. i.. ,;. a <.r.''� ` an _ iii `1i •, .i. -. n f: .,,. s PLANNING t"ISSION STAFF REPQRT RE: r'yGPAl0842D - ,CLT1_,0F RAHCHb�'CUC NGA page 2 At the time of developdient, a, cul -de -sac Was -built abutting the south. parcel line to a)lo�l the sft- to eventually develop as a F; series of flag lots �ccq; qng the. citl- de -I<ac. 7�te Victoria Community Plan design4, 'all o� thei' surrounding, land as Low ttesioential, .Therefore,{ it would oe apilropriate to designate thistr parcel as Low4ensii: car, iste► with ads "s:ent.development, Area R Windrows Planninfl Area kxh4b APR., 227- 091 -9, 26, 49 `50 ' , ~� Recom ended ,fictorla Land Use:- Lo- dilani' Residential (4- dwe1=1 °ng units per .a i ,iitiie Required: °Aend the! Land'' i)se dap` dfneratl Path from ? iu®- Resider ial ` l8- 4 d 11 tR l !per ) t' i. r- diwt Residential 9- duelling unite per aol *,,t r t ri'' .; This i :currently a �*acant parcel boOnd' to the north by Victoria Park Lane, to the, west by �?uthern Cailifornia "Edison corri&, -, to the south by the Southern A411roed tracks and do the �e "t by Day Creek (.Boulevard, WMi fn the WWrows Village��edlatel$ % !'- east of Day .Greek Boulevard and the Edison corridor, = (a "rox- fRateiy 500 feet total) is an existing single far�ly attached ptodu,;t (The` Meadows) ' fin the 014fMedium Res denttial �= 4 -8 idwelling units per. acre) range. The "uMeveloped parcel !north of Victoria Park Lame is Mtuium- Density, while the undeveloped parcel south of the railroaU tracks; is also being currently!, considered for annexation into, . Victoria as Medium -high deniftyIArea, C)L This parcel would be appropriately designated. low- Mediiup 1Densfjty consistent with thp, c�- fisting develoMent east of he ,gay Creek W le!,.ard /Ediso; orri ddr,• y + (, Area C The Lakes North Planning .Area. {exhibit B),. -- 'IPti 22/ 091 -1R through 222, 25:x, 43 Recom nded Victoria' Land Use; Medrru�s- liigti+ Residential iii 24 dr!ellibg units per acre). Iki tie Sted: AmM the Land Use Map 6V the Genera Ian f¢m )►�di - Residential 18-14 cal ?Aug units 37 acre) to rediuw-Nigh Residential (14-24 dmillog units .mr,Ac+ This parcel - presently contains an existin' fire Station on the test portion ,of the.ite, and an approved nine acre apartment prodect, 'DR 85�4t, loca Y d approXamately 550 east-of the Day , Creek Channel, but =for the:iMOS� part, the "parcel is still used as a ifiney�rd, The site 'is, bound to ,the nott�h by the railroad rfght -of -way, tc the f l nest by the Day Creek- Gh8A21 /Ed�ro?ttorxidor' to__'the south by gas e t „ t,i PLANNING COMMI3$Itlk ST#F UPOR7 "'CITY pW �CMONGA Paj� 3 a s Line fioad, ` and the past by Bay 'Creek, Boui evnrd, The -- proper , �y u imm diately north of . the railroad tracks if�ai�lso cure y, being considered for an6ie atioo ,to Victoria- as. l.ow- tiedfiu nsity " Residential (Area s). The �i�, perty im ediately south: of 8a�O Une,< Road is art~ undeveloped. - kNel ' °wfithi�' �Regfona�iy Ratato � ' ; Office %Cora ercial de i0ation Of the Vi coda Ply. Thies pareI wa -Ald be ap rapria#e1y des #gn led Aediuta- tjigb, i ecause 1) the }�arcdX has direc�li access to ,bo i � se tine Road and , R a. y Creek B,outenvta 2) In cur�ty xo -KI'gh Residential s ap}rovrdermxprojeoc A$ dwel' Its per, acre and a) i�in rpraty d , �? try tha prGpased co rcial deb lo0nnt south of Bast Line Road' Area -)y The: Lakes Ror. Planning,.Area (Exhibit 0). APN: 227- 111 -1; 33,38. „ Recomended VictoriaAand Use. LI ov- !vmdiOm Reilden�Tal fi�-8 tl4711ng' units per acra)� � s } AGti A requeiked; . Aid the ,Land' Ute iiap of thOk- Geosrar7 Plan. from - ,h !'tdiva- idenkial (8-14 d*Trii"q RAift pert act*) Loo' *d3u* -, ` Residential (44 delling> aeitssrer ac c This -F4rC6j,,d €s. presently used fdi- si gI fa ily� residences and a. landscape r�....;;ery. Site is boui bi Vittoria Park ' Lane on ti:- 1 , west, Use Line Road to ;'tile 4* h,, and eats -ting single fame ly residential (The Country) to Cft- -Borth and east. The adiacent residences are within the Low- i'�edi %p Density 0 -8 dwei'Ainrp I'nit. per acre),, this parcel would be ePpropriatelyidesigoated Lo±� �edivae consistentc;with t4A existing deveioo ent ,along the north s*?,O� east s ,, boo riq- sr '' Ared�E The Lakes Planning Area�(7j:khibit 0) F r" AP1. 227 - 171 -18. Recommended Victoria -Land ;Use :` Had iPm- gesidentfial dwiiatng units per zcee) Actiop reque ted: - �Wend'tile Land Uxe ftp df the Aen *rggjhPleat` irou' per rsr /4om>mrcial to Wediom- Resideiattall (8-14 .d, ling ;units t h a t Curing ~_,e planning of the Victoria Plannad Comunity„ i was ., decided to lo6ate the neighborhood eommercl site on the.'norti side of Base Line. ";, The paro +el in question is ,too small to supperkl, a neighborhood, shopping C #n(Ar, C _ PLANNI G COW%SI15N STAFF REPORT RE:,'' GPA 88 -02C - f CIM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May"25, 1938 Page 4 The .parcel contains an existing house, and is located on the south side of Base Line' Road surrounded by vacant Ian& The Fakes w planning aria, is - curtly in the early stages q land use r studies. At thi?tiate,`,staff "s recoImendati.on is,;'to adopt a Medium- Density designation and allu this parcel to be +considered .as part- of: the overall Allister P lanning<of the Lakes area. III.. ZNVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The environmental ('Checklist had been. c) completed ,y staff an�-s gnificant, ad�€arse 2rtuironmental.ibpacts were .Adeniffied as associated With the - ,proposed lend- use revisions. S10f,'"Neco nds issuance €� $ Negative Declaration for' ;. a General Pl ao` Amendment 88- 1320. _ IV,, FACTS - FOR FI1 DING: Planning C} irQion must ;make the fallowing n ings w reyardi to the.proposed General Plan Amendment. A. The proposed ' ndmint.does not c6flict with the Land Use`Policitts of the General Plan; and LR; p S. The pproposed amendment would be consistent with the goals of the hand Use Element; nO C. The proposed,amendmert would not be materially injurious or detrim6fital to the adjacant properties; and 0 D, That the Subject properties are suitable for the uses \',1 permitted in the proposed, district in terms of = access, size and cow 7atibility with existing land use and surrounding aroas. V. CORRESPOHDEXt.- This item has,been advertised as a Public Hearing - in ('Tie Daily --_R�e--�tort newspaper and notices sent, to ell property owners win�ODneet of a %ch area in question. VI. RECOWNDATIOr -( ` (',Staff recommends approval of General Plan � endmenlr -ilk -RC through : adoption of the attached Resolution recoaa�ending, approval to the City" Council and "issusncg% of a Rlegative Declaratipr;> Res Xully s fitted, f. City 1 niter Attachments: Exhi)iA *A" - windrows, Planpi% Area : 4 ` Exhibit "Bw - 1t Lakes Planning Aeaa ExhiMt %w - 9 eral Plan Lard Use Asap < ` `Apkwiai Resolution 0 f I i � —' � `=="=m ollege '... I.. INN i AMEN so f _; 7'i0N Nk1. \ A RESOLUTION € "THE PLANNING CM*IS &IQN OF THE CITY' OF ' \`: = RANCHO CU AAA, CALIPORRIA, RECOMKNDING APPAOYAV/ OF GENERAL P AK,NOMENT NO. W02C ARENDiNG:THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RMM, CUCAMONGA GENEM "PLAN FOR PARCELS WITHIN THE YICTQRMPOMM MIT' ,PLAY AREA: FM ! LQ i- 2RrpI2 t (9- fh CLING UNITS PER ACR9 TO LOW,(2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PERR - APR: ° 227-+4I1 -7; EROk�#Iltl�l Sri DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MMUM (4-8 OWELLIT IMMITS PEN, ACRE) APR: 227'- �9L»N, 2�4 49, 5f�, .FROM Ii�f (O-1+� ONELLI � UNITS PER ACRE) T4 ftIM"IGH (14,424 OWELLING UNITS PEVACRE) AN: 227 - 091.18 THROUGH 22, 25, 43; FROK MMUR (S-14 DWEI.UNG 'UNITS PER ACRE)'J, La! -WMILM 04 DkLLIK UNITS PER, ACME) r APR. X27 -I1,� I, 33, 11, AN4 FR Nl:iGts O° toWERCIAL, T€I WaItM a 1 13 IAl GLIHG"WITS PAR ACRE) AM.. x"274,71 -19.' � ffo 1 WERE , 0e Planning GomaUston has held a duly advertised publto hearings to consider ill comments on the proposed �Gftneral Alan Afer nt 964, , 4 It sIEC]` ok 1: The Rancho,�Cucamo g .Pl in o0 mission hereby dukes 1 f the toll_�*T g' PRO s: . / The : Amendment does n��t canfi _ t with the Land Use. AWL !Polfcies'of the General Plan. U; The A+ee nt+promotes atitlfi of the Land Use Elemse�t. The Amendalent . ould no' be w4terially in$uripus Apr \, detrimental to the adjacent properties. _t l t!, D. That`the;:sobject grroperttcs are ,sultable far the uses permitted in 't [apg ed 41strict in tarms of access, size and' omp�ib lit,' with existing land u ,and surrounding areas. ys SE�;TION 2• The General . Plan Land Use Map shall 6e 'amended as j described FeMiW" an3°as shown on the attached Exhibits "9 and ,10% ' A. t,a- ii!4n Residential (4 »0 dwelling unfits per, acre) ta'tow Residential (2T4 d*illing units per acral" for a0Proxima'tely I.O 1cre on the south side of Highland � Aiienue approximately midway between Rockrose Street f " t1'd ,Locust Av3nue » APN: x,227 -41 -75. S. WAilum Residential (11-14 dulling units -(2 -4 dwellin wn'ts per acrel to - Lois' -Rediu Residential (2- dw�`M64 units per :acre) for approximately 37 acres I at ;the southwest`aurcer of the future Victoria Park ianle and future Day Creek Boulevard - APN. 227-091 - i i 9, eft, 49, SO. qW e 1 l f +. PLANNING COMKISSION RESOLUTION, NO. RFt1 GPA 88 -02C w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM9NGA r May 25, 1988. !` V/ C. Medium Residential f8-14 dwelling units Rer °acre). to�� Medium -High Residential {14 =24 dwelling units :; per crek for aRproxMately'34 area, ;ft the northwest corner of Base 'Line :cad and the IMture 7 ©ay Creek Boulevard APNt 227- S'1 -18 through 1'.2 2�, 43. • D. Medium Residential t8-44 dwelling .units - p.er acre) to Low -*dium Residential (4 -$ dwelling�unfts per acre ), for approximately 5 acres located at the n0theast corndr of Da." Line Road,and Victoria -Park Lane APR.- 287,111 -1, 83., 38. , E. Neighborhood Con�mmercial 'loo i+iedi''rsm Residential t8 -14 dwelling units per' acre) for aRproximately, 1 O acre at the .southeast corner of Baseline Road W the ` southerly, exta►nsion of Victarla Park Lane - ''APNa 221 -17 -1-19. SECTION:` 3: A Negxti4e Dea aration is`hereby' recoomended for (� adoption b"y`thi" i-M Council for this .-f r l Plan Amendment, based uparr the completion and findings of the �jnAial'`St . NOW,, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning c Comission does hereby .rkoemend approval, of General Plan Amendment No. 88-02CAh { to the City Councils, f APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26THf DAY OF MAY 1988. F 'PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY ',0 RANCHO'CUCAMCHGA � ! BY: tarry T. WNW a rman 4 ATTEST. Brad u er, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy 3ecretvy of the Planning Commission of 't = -of ,,. Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was %nd regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coiaaission the City of Rancho C +.4famonga� at a regular meeting o``f tiffs Piann og CoWssin r 'ld on the 26th day of May 1-988, by the fallowing vote -to -wit. l�e. AYES:. COMMISSIONERS.' O MISSIONERS: jf NOES; CMISSIONERSs ' ABSENT: CO ISSIONERS:_ 0 • r CITY OF RA CUCAlVIf1NGA STAFF DATE: 25, 1986` To. Chai�an and Kember` ,F,� the Planning Comission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner y r BT: Richard'"Alcorn, Code Enfo c nt Supervisor ` SUBJECT: EkyIRQI �Ai. I�SE& A!� DEVELOPMENT I CooE AWND -gENT �6=iiN i! WGAAOMK aan n a se` ion' `3 °a'nx- f"ji;9",ii1 -B and :adding a new t4',V06 MIO P -A to the Develo pment Cede pertaining is to the parking And'rtorage, of vck13c 4s on private property, in Residen'tial,.Commercial /Offitie and Industrial Districts I. BACKGROUND: Ci�YL Council has directed staff to amend` the eve )Pftni' C.:de "tc tighten the requirements for parkin on privata property,. S ific recommendations were made to improve, exi tiag regu at ons �ol� they affect: The i0antity vahtclevji4rmitted to he stared on residetial property; 8. The:approp,riats 1osa&tions on property f4) vehicle parking and storage; and t 3. The City's , ability 'tei f rce 9r6atP, propert�" parking vioiatfons, �J Tn ~.Addition, recent amendments to the ldunicj'pali Code modified certain sections requ ?ating prwa A property pl ng. These additional sections deal with regulation of: L Oversize' and overweight vehicles; 2. Corcial and recreational vehicles and- equipment; and ;1 r c 6. ftr41ng on paved areas only. Existing Devil ant Code ',,provisions treat ;Residential and Comrcinl /Iicdastriatl arsj4erties 'differently, To correct :this inequity, additional rega:nts;'for vehicle parking and storage are recommended Parking regulations foxy C6mar4i.at1`Industriat property have Mean prlvidea dealing specifi .cally with proaiems fotsad at these 39cations. The range and in %nt of #,liege i� C5 btANNiHG tORdS`SPH,STAFF RkuQY<l Development. Ccxie'dMendment 88' pa25, 1988 e2 , a dditional regulations is consistent kith parking,.qui:^ent fAr other- /zoning districts. a. - . eri'orcesent ' of griva pr�Pe�Y parking regu% „�ons.ts the responsibicity of Cone`' cr�'prdewnt staff. The asa �,2d�-�prking regulations are being designate; as n €ractinn5 to j, 4r�ir Ye �enforcea�ent ability, an In fractio� violations are } i punistW'q, > $ a .tit* Of. Up to 5I. ,r:,yiatlr AQ_ ttrronstderatiort of ;a ` , iJaii t6lo W entitlement to, a Jury trfa�: , Though Cade, Enforctmek endeavor's to Viere are._ ti 1, sal rr It beds necessary t¢ issue a> iW1,9n. , By q y #ng certa violations ' an nfra tg n deli rraLior: it si ilititss a� Wceleratas COUO, pronaedin* � ar.ainlation5, sorb �� stor; g S an excessive oui6er af�are;icles„ d violate land use pro»isio �s -T, as well as theme parking re J3 ` in these instances, land'; violation would bet, a �i Wean�►r, allowing a coil ii decision to Inc VII higher fjnes, ,probation, dnd�,;ost assek 8�`� FiCORMW MOWICiTIONS: The following,lapguage "s ; g ested to z� " (' morr, clearly define parking require3ent on private pro r� �tiorz 1 .08,67" otAs AaiAendat�3: �jk . C Whicle Parking. Thg`.girking of vRticles fn' '411 residential i r sis lne sub$kt to pe following 7rovisions. 'Thy, design guidelines aind r2galatione�; or parking areas shall conform zo the prMgVJ fans of Chapter 17az of the Development Code; ". Vehicle parking shall= be within an "enclosed garage, C arport or',other,requi.red or authorized off- street paved, parking area; 31 All, parking areas *Ithin public viey fraat `the,'str et, public right -of -wo br adjsctot view,, shall bt' purred w th a Rerm<anent pavi )Mg material.' ' Such area shall bo saintained in a usee1e condition free of potholes and broken sections;sufficiedt= V prevent mud and /cr`Oustt without accumulation ' Of To osir' material og tither deterioration- /_� i#ehic 1 es gay ,ad, or stared in the side or .ear yard pravi� d that such area is screened feom' view from thi Il "r stye , public Or and adjacent iroperties by a fence wall, or equivalent screening material At 'least five s? feet, in might;' r i a } in iside and re#r yard areas sj�all tae., e1 ent (5t) of the total lot area or i �i square feet, wbIchevj;r Is gi`ea r, d pursuant to an ippr.,oved,,' or I d in Subsection 9 herein, vOMcles lic view .;irw, required or aut rdipd tn:the front yard, corner side srd or g a ,street shad be parked o', le t .air, periods of time not to, exc4#4 fi e in this seciign shall include;' taut not Oftfal vehicles, automo es, trucks 1. trucks, seed- trailers, torc,�cles, calepershells, boats or . other',, large - Ial acid commercial eiuipmWty and',< >Ifx whicd exceeds a gross' *ight of'one � l r4 1/2) tons, or exceeds ,a width of oil, exceeds a�hei t of n (7 Oet ngth of Wentyfive (25 feel ; no A Nited vehicle •(e.g. towtruck, sia kebed m 'G414ormam, I I* c.� �+asked on any part 7!iItZjI.41 k MIAWFa, sraliers, eTX.t: 5n� �bf a residential, lot "unless 1 t ue (11 _ P1�IlPtriNG COtRtVSS?i0H STAFF R Et velopeent Cod+F l4lnoent £��� May 26 1968 tf veh b`te 1� r0ze the wt►11's actin l involved n' here :. y i l� Such page activi0ii i` r , (���� in conforFAACe with t ohdItions �►f app"va)t fur a va std �pCccupatfion per s proitide�� �� - AGL IP _ 'L .1irking - l iai d Vo 1 t five hundred 6 ,; unl s constrw IQ Dive ."', nt A;evi sita�il. parkAd pr star :,trihin si4i yard or si yard tI 6. except all grow parked w,�*t'ry �ireet unlisi (.11, it is not a co rcial' vehicIt parking arws wi side ,yaird, abut: Standing for tem (2) it is involr �� lording 1 �. Ct 7. - Vohicles "' as US be, lirait4d t t2� trailers,, Moto? mopeds,.._ tampers � portaate—recreat 8. wo-kowercial, ve eighty (80} i,ich or exceeds a rnecializ3d,�iilrt� a } in iside and re#r yard areas sj�all tae., e1 ent (5t) of the total lot area or i �i square feet, wbIchevj;r Is gi`ea r, d pursuant to an ippr.,oved,,' or I d in Subsection 9 herein, vOMcles lic view .;irw, required or aut rdipd tn:the front yard, corner side srd or g a ,street shad be parked o', le t .air, periods of time not to, exc4#4 fi e in this seciign shall include;' taut not Oftfal vehicles, automo es, trucks 1. trucks, seed- trailers, torc,�cles, calepershells, boats or . other',, large - Ial acid commercial eiuipmWty and',< >Ifx whicd exceeds a gross' *ight of'one � l r4 1/2) tons, or exceeds ,a width of oil, exceeds a�hei t of n (7 Oet ngth of Wentyfive (25 feel ; no A Nited vehicle •(e.g. towtruck, sia kebed m 'G414ormam, I I* c.� �+asked on any part 7!iItZjI.41 k MIAWFa, sraliers, eTX.t: 5n� �bf a residential, lot "unless 1 t ue (11 " j ° it; is'; actiuelyinvolld (2i �i in making pick -ups and cane tiotl=V th, and in aid tt, the tf veh b`te 1� r0ze the wt►11's actin l involved n' here :. y i l� Such activi0ii i` r , (���� in conforFAACe with t ohdItions �►f app"va)t fur a va std �pCccupatfion per s proitide�� �� i Sec for 17.04.0" of ��,e�FT iloppent`Co 9. No private, non -cim °rcial vehicle �iich, exceeds a �r�� - weight of one ands -hal•f (b and 1 /2) tons, = or ex ±aids a relfoches, width of ei9tity t6(t or + excwds a height o Sven 1 (7) feetor '' excee�a a`length of «fins (2o l et• ,; and no trailer, IlsvfAt- recreatcignal trai Ter ,�t or Cori be IQ c >equipwerit the front ,yard, corror sita�il. parkAd pr star :,trihin si4i yard or si yard tI h9 at �ireet unlisi (.11, it is not a co rcial' vehicIt and x pernOT fey t+eleporary period o€ ti ; . is e#cead -^ �r (2) it is involr �� lording 1 �. Ar vnlaadixi t ; -.a (8l $ pa► *41 �complianre with ark+ o;t r applicable'Ci y dinarCe in . t2� . ` Ni q PLANNING CftMWION STAFF B£PpRT T r Development Cede AOaOdnWn 0.04 Mav -IS$ 1980, Page 4 10'. Violctionc of atw provision of this subsectiott shall �� y( Punishable as fan infraatfan, Subsection dYi4rM4N'vii�V # S, Any Secant ry paved dr�e�er�ay 4r exterisian of the ri rx 'driv�ay shall not be 'aced for parking unless., (i) it " cunnectr the primaSy drtieW aacesa to ,a, second access point "Oth the street or public . right-of-way circular drive oa y) with a ts inttous, pavement widtya not exceeding twelve (12} eet> t(zi it i �an extens ,E of , the priwgry driveways totard cite nearest side er rear far4 area; or {3* is q;nstructed pursuant to are a9proyt -d Mitres tie% -Mont �� j�ewtt, - ,, ' Subsecttan 17.10 -ti fl*( 'iactige }: 0. Vehicle Parkin "P The parking of vehicles - n all • . came" ro�a`T`/off'ice 4nd industrial districts sha'c.I b� su� ect to the following provisionst � ANIL z 1. The desig 941[0�0ines and regulations for parking facilities shah(Cccs•� s:_2�:�the piovisians of Chapter 17.12 of tF,e Vie' -aunt Code and any applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan; Vehicle Parking shall be within buildings, garages or bother required- or autharixed off. street paved parkingr�� �acilities.' tt_ 3, All parking facilities within puhtic view roar street,. public right- of..way ar4'a,�^,ajant property s�il�e Weil With a perrlardsn4 panning era' dial a Such area shall be Maintained in a useable condition free of potholes and broken sections Tgficient to prevent *_.o X41or dust, <; without U accu*alaVptr' of loose material or other 44 No vrrhicle siaal'F' be parked f`dkt the purpose :6f disployfng such vehicle' far sale or other com#M1atl activity, includit buy not liolted to,, lease, hire, advertisjngrJ etc. vehicle is ,_ >parked by, or +pith• _� - writt�n permission of, a business on the property! which i is lre anted, licensed and approved to disol,y v4hictas far= uch purposes, D6V*loprWnt Code Amer4ent $444 _ S. No vathiclt Shell be pArked„fvr tF,e PuWe oVrepair or eaaintenance,unlessc } } such work is perfaraed on *ohiolas awned or operated b�y the m-site businels'r "ithin. a;n enclrased bu� ding Or, yard area streenoe crow view from ?r t ae street, public right-of-way, ad$o'ent properties and ra aaired `I off4treet'' parking factlitiot with public' adcoss; o in toppect on with a current om�sit4 „ business 3r�itE d Ito ,�& form repair or ,reeinter ��ice< of y vehiclts and Only dl,rinq established iusiness h0ur " 6. No vehic N wiaicr is dUAR4d=;..unl censod, unregistered, noper4ttve or fret #high an Ouse"Oal at legally ;1 required a Keratin art`is reeoved Pr 1ssinlL shall be `Wt%in p'ia is view t tx the street, tic right "parked ;� of-way , ad aC it op+ertias ur rego�l'Ib Off- street parking facilities 44th public access; ., r �Y ,to is v41,aicle ekreadingra gross weight of one And or .hal t and �2f tons# or 4meding a width,?ff eighty ` (801 Inc r a trailer or srmi- trAiler shall b* ked l C1 within a rcial /office district unless,; �� }`' it is 1qW- sf "Iened lic view from tM strap" Ablic, riot. "tfes; ?�, o or�aay.,a adjacent pro r (2) fit; <is actively, involved kink L�ek* ps a iivaries or '(3) in cannett;h, aa�;,,? il aid" ` tiro gorfoasranco of a service to i or on, t{- pro where the vehicle Is parked, °white tWal invoty i % *A activity; 8. '"Vehiclee as used in this on s all include, but not, be' limited to, c vehicles, ?aafioaobiles, trucks #� ' � trailers, aKOt r t � ra�lers, awtorcycles, ° "pads, cabers, 4;t6per std = st= .boats or other large ,portable recreational = ca ercU1 4 ip nt, ; S. Violation of ana► provi` �Isubsection shall p.4 punishable as an iilfraetio#r. 'S c $ :' st ai MRONLIl+ENTAL SSESiSe Vf: Staff h�►s coo-low part it of the a:nvrwen : ecki'and concluded that theropazod awwenlent wauid '� cr;ate., significant adverke en�vironeaen al my ts", lherefC , staff rt�oaelends' issuance Of a teq ;tive 0*61araticn. III. Gtiit E3�tMEWU 'This iteii was adverti iii °as a publit hearing in . " '! e"Vai ly Report news9tper. .:o $ate, UO i�Ort e5P Wencli has boon reed: ve z � O tD IF � �tAtMY G'G (IfS;iF,.l3 3jAFF iEPQRT �yk?/e'��'�'re 5' 7i9�BC�o e ri to 86,4 may ° E Fad Eta bppir�r� 1, to the Wt4 council of ti,r ."Pr opo3e rwdfeot And issuance . o � �, i3a4atIve' ) t? Resp ly s city ' Bg*.RLA:ns t1 Attac*ntsa Dchlbi C z, W, a b"018pompttw, e �ecti�ns 070 -G and Ex h�im- ��' �nvi�nmentai 'Check9fit PN't Lu; 21 ,. ° ReSOutfdn Hof Appro�ti , 4 r.11l r 1 `t �.� % n ( v 4. r'here, shall b -4,o mjn;1, m_.. J� iaclau , LUC J „ 'r $, 2h ms riznWN s.treat yard' setback on pubIic` strek shale.', ire i?, vi -td"ormance r,i,th, Viable ? ij, 08.040D,> ' g mobile Home` arks end q, bile tats bile homk -, parks shall not lie d&�,M hancontox-sni:t,9 �rpason s C, of failui. ;tc meet t X�►�njmum r�i' !�rimeAts pre�;aiUas ' #,P phis . smct:'ioti, provs3eri, that the regulations t this uB�;ec- Lion` shall' apply - to the er ar4ement or mobile home 'park, (OV4, 233;,,8 t�a�t� y IQ Genoral �ssos sics a � 5i z�s r l all zee sident al, tii" s iC s; 0-_P ry 31 bB ,Sat act to t&s8 p t�vs -, slogs d 'Ti t of e <. , 1 > e. • yAll. huiM4- vVgsEt»trlsCb lxBS'v yards and : cs $3;nYl be mal:n't"ained An ,e Mahner .0 th p i the fmma ate nei5 bo hood The ft 1 �t�tas car. Mons are pMuhsiai4ed: �' ^F ,z3n }sa.fz�; 3e�atiig: or. ucrepaisl gtxu c, iencess, roo �3, c aors, wars, inzl i nd rs; 2 ": $crop lumber, ���k, 'trash o�- uiebrist � �� � � 3. Abandoned, dislgtrded oar upused •o'bjec;:s,'ox'. „eq' uti,p- srOW* such as auto'MOT:mlesi A*omobile parts;.. furt#itr�+�r, stoves," efrxye.ratars cansct ootitalners, ox i tilasr✓ tcmat Z At;gnant �t�� br giccjtratiorts, "atbaclt}d3 aryls qtr .spas:r "5' AnY 3& ice, aecbzauzoh,`�dat�:an. as ;nre •rr o vgatil;n yob cyh tlltsightly by reason;, of gait *: apn ° lion, .r �-- 99��►apxSt['2ocation. C � e arF.sng. The parkfnS;'of i resi denb tfit+tr ct,s s3tall1, be s ab ject to , toe 93 cpv si6ns ,Irt- � ' Cf'aofor 17 U ai3� D Vehicle aitd' Ettxlf�Yiett� RApair andwtoxace,,, login b V�csiono, s.�ail;apgly to=�ny vehi��B, motctz camper, .ansper trailletftit,raij4r, 1�11motOtec eamper,j`,C coach, me torcycle,"_b0 "f 'r simz_1ar �onvgpnce in ail den :La c�isb�riot rtes i� Any ;other tizclzict t, use <t for residu"l �«� .�i�P"�t a 1.� Ser "uxc�ng 'cap; d3' cs�'r�w� s4mbl` , ,;' sassBm3iS in g, 1 Wrackii,r , mod. .'irk, ras ar n` . otherwiA;s wurkieg can any of. : he al,ava dj44 ey;nces shall., b ;��,�hihi.ted unless :;ocn� \, v ducted i+}itl sn�e gtarage r it also. 3r br�sld i q, nr n'an`a�e soraen d from view fry, , z r �•a� atrBe� and�,adl"�ain�inq° lots,�i , a. eg llY 3acak �i e*s �.. >" wa.Lf or equivalent screening.. ,taY�g nq �r harking any -,tiff t:h above conve�ianr s, or han s lice tas� 9 xtrea.5�er1, kr�ratie, orrc�, �rt,chrtki eusen `° �,?a ca ,xBgall��reatii, ,�d X,�ej�atinql °aft n,s r`�� °d, shah, Vie'' ��:4 r i j <' ora�►ib's�e%*' -�-'��S�k����ta ���',v�tiil'n a c��irag�e ay ac4as�oz�< ; r � "� building raeaecl frog view, From tl; L et �� j 11 ?a (Racicho Cucatitcnga. cX` 4) a G J f <, 4� pyl!yvV /+T 12, Striping. All 1parking stai34 shall %be., clearly. : t 1 striped an R., veimartently ma:lnt-pine�'t, with d0ublz `'6r hairpin on the sur ace of thq,.g4rkk&L facility, with thei. Q 1'5,oies' loolt6d. an a ual -dio anCe of nine incYres tsn either. } idQ +af the ._` j2l zidoilhes: in all park ng .fa i iiti S, all l aisles apple+ a � jaizes, -And man tt inq teas Snall..T j _-14arly marked *v vi h di-rectiohdl, arro406nd lines to zVaffi,; ,, � P� � l r + +t > a t, riAg•: rk 0§1 and i7at'flegv °i. this 81r S ' Shall be ar�.e i ' ?'- so th`<�t a�ilr ''zrehicle 8ntering public ight� o €tt�+3y , it a m�jc�r 6i se60nr2axy street can do, sot d� elsng jC a f, and 3irection, vA ent; al. The olXowinq,,d�sa� sta4dards sh&ll� s1 apply, to the residential distri,hto ana, dpyelapittetits:• o .° 2r. Covered oti- street JA;kin4,s* es in a garage or carr.ort Silall �2 ­yA diinlmM ,af n���e feet za �'srith end nine= , teem feet in depth, cf :unobstru�_<y' ,ed avea, provided kor 'parki. q purposes." The require6`,ihittimu- meap ilrements may not'�;include ), .the extor for wFjl:�s ar sup ottg, c t$e structure,, o 2. D,ra.veiaays prof tdinr acres tO.�gl eges, .:a'pdr and Ba king„ "areas setcv ng =thrd6 . or: lass dwe1 inq units shell be'a mini�um o, on end = Y i � J tw`enty feet f two -wax traff :e. ca Y Driveways prrvid3iig acce�a5 to Jgarage5,arpcaY is r c� r hrl zsn p,3rjki�;g Sates _sevzYtg four�or more �iwet li tg unit`s r .'° mall be' a minhn4ta at i442,re feet in width for" Otto av t!.- af-fray end aet, for, ttwo�7ay t:iriC. 272 =101' (R?�`sChtt Cu+ amari�a ". f, <%( c { ` t - �, `. X41 ways sei. xf4� ple dwelling Units Wr txll (, ' garages ax carports on, dither or��both sides shall h�J {n —, creased a minimum a; five feet . o#- one sit4� only, `tht�()+r hiding a'_ twenty, -nice foot wide accepoay O' etween rs ar'-Age ax U aaleport spacsn for4 tw "4y txaffic�- 5 � property Owner �shar l +sub ase � . su#rent or - othezwise make ova }iabla tti residr�rsof th�apert�es,`" �t r �• 49 f ''theyaff stPet.pZ►;ring spatces recitrired Y�y�hx�z�SSeGtiox�,: l`ti y 6* ,1iia rr ui-ed covered oicf- street parking spac�;s; �. shall be xacated C;y ,Wveniently a6caa}aibz-a to the dwell xic� served by suc�',parkio% space.. R�sid ntial deveiagments which provide private; stir`eeta, shall- be p1',�nhed, designed , -4', ctonst ucted to meet ;X' � �4 the minimum' pity, enq. ,neeringr; a for primate c streets., 8. All r cr aticnal vehicle parking and/or stozage areas looaited' witniri the front yard settb4ek shall �$ paved C with either Asphal,tio,00ncrete, ceta i nt,` gravel or ,oJ shed ; rock. , Cr' Commercial, institutional, Cd6dunity`�P #alitieu� ' The following design stilndards shall apFtty to c+ommerc3al," 3rustitutiori 1, and community, , £acil tty Az "s : 1. Those arena designated for^ use } y mo orclTCles sY4�b11 cony st alt -a minim=, sable 'area' of fi ty-sz %.,squ'are � �: Parking' hay Yazd hs sha11 be computed aIEcording u to the speo3 ficatians� set earth in, 'Tab1e �,1'�:00�?;, s 3 Two -way access dra�reways. wi.lal a x�Arkin'4' s�+a� Y. . be a' i sinix� or, twentu- Imiur ,feet , `�Ohe °way z6 ess driveways i with no par s9 sTjalX be a m1ailpri o t�relve feet, I D� Parting dGil y besifv V&idwing ar4 charts talid, °' J diagrams to which a13. puking li' cilitieb' shall- be desa,gned; f j " 1', Parking ay, Widihs. ' Each pazki.ng facility 'is designed with parting bay un t�s. VAe sire,,or width of this x, -) u: t is depe'nAgnt on one or (� `+ av trg-E'fic and single or double: I-oadedt aisles. Use t j-��lowiaig;-chart to detgrmine _ t: the overall . z4 dth of the. parkipl Day', design which (Is teing ! ,)used,- The .dimensi:onsrlsst ari, th^� mot:.: r necessary to conti CIA parking stall-Agpth` and ang may be. permitted; seweve�xr�t'hey dust not be ted as part of the required dtIveway- 4i4th anri:, must rtairitai.n four feet hetween spates ti r. r -r .q AI YJ {It8 G114 Ct>camm� L 272-102, y a r } Page } },, a. TChagea in curr64t��Qr the ',ourscs. of dig- ect;,bn of flowing, streams, 'rivers, or epb =eral 4tre� �. channels? b. "Changea in.absorption, rates,, 3rain'aga pats:trnsk or tki�q rat* And out'of surface vatsr jr runoff? V �� zo 7 i� c. Alterations xd tk^,+oourse or floss o£ ftaa:� f Waters? r d: Changa in the amongt Of surfa,:e water in ary ` bo4, of dater'?' , e. Aischirga into sar�a�cf: watbrsq or any ' �.. °' ztgratari��f :surfacs water 4uality? �' T f l;Ceratvn round water aharactarei,v $• G'�an$a in the g0autiky of grdandliaters* aid or ihrp ugh, direct dditions or �aitts dr wa,.s or through in arfeience with an' aquifer? a v, " � ' �? via 4'•��nt�tT� � �, v .�� `� G. h. Ths reduction in 'tho "'Amount c '1atur other- wise �railab;efQ, pu, !it w�°`., iupplies? i. Exps�s'pe paQpl�� ro�vi, _ to w4rlor zalat t. hsrards such as floodirg or i!eiches �. s4ir alit # ' 3;�1 zhe prgpcaal �ati�a si$nificszer� remelts ihl s n. r. e a. A \CDs �, natant or-j;. #odic air eas#asion's fr6lx no'hile ox inciire ^iresa.y o Stationary sources-? b. Deterthiration asf xambICA 4r qualtpy agd,1or nterferi�cnee with; the att � inment , of s fp7icahle c stir quality standards c. Alteratiar,of Local or regional climat% 6 conditions. affecting 'air movement°.,, moiztute or tdlperat�4re? ,- , Flare' � r � V, mill the ptOposal havi ' # &i6 ilicant resin to •, nP In the eharacta i s of spsRes,3 i clud� g, d acrsity, d4triaution.- nt nuwber, d� anx �cies of plants? is. a+iucti rr fr b�t e.vsaters of A v u 'que, s ' �, �1 , or a 1 tti c sutfarad sac3a�s o£ plants? .�... , a 7 Yes MAYBE . ^-T^— c, '':in�4roduceil�r! of new or disrtiptive species :i A' 5tnt' f2tCC�IS r10di - . -_ r_ yY C. d. .Reduction :fin the pcasntisl , qr , ^gricultura prod tion? Fauna. Wf�,1 they pro a signiiicat re "suits a„ Change in the= Charae4atiscleg of species, including tiYvessity, distr "Putiouh Or mumts�rs -� of any specie¢, d1 ^,arim ls,t h. Reduct ,an of the =1bars`gf rrity unigtie, rare "sf , pr end�nge�ted specicp ®f ktiimals ?° _ I c. �ntrodd�ction �Y nOlt is of � IJ animals -into, aYm area, rssul,t Co the migration or'Zovement ks anax aid d. Deterio atl ,;ooi removai of slAsting fish s�ildli � hab' at? t 5. P opuTatian . � 1 � 5,1 the proposal rcxve taigri3lEicaftt results ' J , a— -V ly`i S j%pr�pogal ltok thm 'i0l eatibn. - dlsts4M button, dents `y, d sae &'sitYy ovi-- rowth� rate 41f tier hIn popaation of at► urea.1 Gr b. Will Cho pro�csaT 1<f @c� existing Yh6using -i or create a. demsnli f�i adUtUnal :housing? W3ll th b. Socio- EcDflo4wC e` ptl?p0sal Nava ! signiy!Cant..Tasu],LS a; Change in local pr ragiot�al soci+b- aronopsic r:. charactarisiticrn inc3udfnj economic oZ cnmrne�cial divetsat. tax property b.1317�rt�ec�, conic be�egat «ab,1y dietsihu.ed Sir amont. Nrojtct benaft ciarfx� ', i.e .,, buyeis, i l�tax puy, rs -,or project users ?�" 7. Land Use and Planning Consideratians...,'4 U the propoggl have significant resL7cs in?, T a, A "su6Ytantial aitetitilon of Cfie present or 3� plaaned land use of �'r tea? 4 } l b ;A conflict Kith`anr E �; aPolzcies, rPr .adopted p?a a ok any gd ;er. rt,, ataU v s, , 7,n4�t #tapacs v�par�Vthar <galaity cr quantity C 1{� ea Lin' aanpEivx fan- cosrsuatpCide r �' 1� V g d '? ogres icapal a portun t?ei? U( ��N 1 f" Page b W W c YES AYS° NIA MAYBE 8... Transportation_ S SrSI•LA�' i a., °Generation of substantial addit #cnai vehicuiar 1 m movezeutT b. Effects on er siting atrErta; =.or demand fart new s street gonstruction? i1 I C. Effects' an^ ex #sting parking facilit`3ea,4 _ c d. Substantisi impact upon 4 f1ting trans - tion systeaa? a e Altetat of to, resent pattesns'a�f:circuYa� � o`, Sian ar atonement of 9eopig aadlar gaocls? " £. 'Alterations to or effects an "pr ant goten:zip]. water - borne, ri i£, mats ` transit or air iraffi'c. t 8• Increases lit traffic hazards to Motor vrh #clrs, bi�ycusta qr pgdesfdrians -, `, Cultural Resources., FtiF.the prgpostlhave r rs ; s� r3ificant resultw ta: a. A :sisturban e Co ,the integrity, g ty ¢f archaeoiR81ct2 � � ;tpaleontc+log #caiA and/air h #sterical esourcii? 10.` +eaj,th,zfat�v and tYuistrice Factors. =' Will the p a. Creati;aIR, of any health hffiai d: oz poGrtmti < < s�aTth ' - & {/ c. A r44k of explosion ar „ „relesse.of"haaaxdcus 9 d. An increase in the numier of indLW^14`uals . . or species (;t)-a tor„ ar pattYenogeiii"= organist or the,exposurs of peopl't to suc;% z . ozganisms? 0 5 z . a., Yncrts!ie in rK #at #rag noise ke�ue3s? � YE+ ' En sure gf �� ; . .. ., it Y Page 5 Y*5 _,NYSE I N6 . 'Aesthetics. W311 whe grapasa'i issue g�En#�icant io11. resuips_ it± _ a. The obsztuction or dagradazzon of any seealt vista or view? h. The creation os" sn xeathati.cally offensive _...... site? , to A conflict with the objective of de.- ignated or potential, aranic corridors? Ut % ;es_ a_ nd' Public yen ices, td;(\l the proposal, have - a significant need for nev aysi� ur ti alterations to the follow3n�- ; A. Mectric- power? I _ b. Natural or paclxged gals? a. ,.COmmu�aioations aystems? ". d. Vats «_ sup ply? y` e. Wastewater itacilitles2 l r= ..... Flood control Straetsr;as ,,K=a AN& { j $. solid wutft facilities? r h. )Fire prttectioa? f; I. Police or* te :ti on? Schijolff U. Parka or other reereael�r�v facilities? «. MaintenAnae of public i:,�ailitiear jAcludinp roads ::9d flood to j#01 facilities? r ..... .� �. either 8ov'ernmonigl servicesi.;, 13. Enarc xn8 Scarce Rysnurcas, Will the proposal "- have t significant results in: aw Use of substa; -z- it or excessive fuel or ea.'irgy? �r 1 b. Subatantial` increase r.+ demand upon existing sources, of energy? 'increase in the demand for development of itl "� eatirCes of BYiekg r " ?' �f -.--» • •..,..{fit .`.. 'd. '1n increasa or perpakuutioa of consumption _the Of ncnWrenevabla £orxm of 4nex�,y' when feasible r dr able sonrces of OergyL' era available? r: ?age 6 e.ub?at deplatian of anp oarepeiazble ors a e6C8rCE.' ral resource? % 4+M1 iiandator}* Findias�s;,Of Si nificAnte. � L - »., a. Does A3ie the potential toc degrade their llt3 of the anvironasat, substantially`' 4 �� ;reduce the 14bitwt of fivs a wild ar species, cause a fish or "Idlifer population tai drop ' boo' salf , :sta,;.irg leirels, thrfatan to ` al hats m, t,I:t or animal c0vsu Up, reduce the suer air resrsict theti,ttaage of A r�ra o ur Qndzagerad plant or arsit�pI or e3imi;tAtc Wisprtaat eutample of tote+arfgds of C44foraia history c?r prahistoty? b. Toes the" projee,t'liave, th*'Peeaatia! ' to ickave f ` short-term, to the, disadvj6ta,$e of loo$ -term. ci anvirQnM*atAl ,Staffs? (A short_term,;4Xpascr cii 4:he environment is one which occurs; *a 'a relatively brief, defia:tirre -Period'. of tit L mbild; long term imgacCs'wrill enduri wall into the' uture) ' a. Doss tbo pr lect have impacts iy'�are ' • Mvely lndividuslly limit'l but, ivtrit , atively, ca�r ." means that the nct�am �tAl off octi� of an V 14 individual prajec-t are cansidarabie vie when Irk connection with themoffacts, of past projacts.,,­ and probable, future projot$). I d. Does the project have a 4viratuserira ffactm „ - phith Will cr-tse Substantial A�versp affect's on human be3T�$s, either diredtiy tr ludirscilly? BfSCttSS20N OF Elzi72Rfl27 EVALUATION (3. e., of �ffiswiative snswes3 to the above guestioas plus a 1scussion'of prOposed mitigation measuies)., �l Ole Cs o ,A 1 r Y, Y--- n �C�the bgsi�o# this in�.t�a'�- levaluatia ~ r , `} ��� . �• I fin4 "the proposed prd.4dt 66yx iN iT,have s seb C LLsJ l M the environment, a IYECAT VE t'XCLA4F{ATIQH � { V �t . i` a pru rd r 83rhauO> tfie °Pro ;oscd projesec cdtisd ha a 3g� `�oant ¢F£ect on ,LIte drn * #knumant, v ar gill Blot it this ;:aus bacause theumiti ae'icir Measures ` si . gicer:i a ect �iCtached shttt have s #dde y.: �crilsi 9A arc nECLARATIOU V= sE ?E ARED o3 t. W WE VA, � T find e`- +4 p oposid project �£A'Y `ha,;re . eavirnmsnt end an "ENVI$p, � fIdant affect the tx �+Gi 9;91T QAT s r4quired. Tlate��L�/ j€T f qw t p , �'"".- `�e�� . �c✓i3k> � fib,-- 1f h 9 )AJ' Oa 9 . ,A9 y is o R1�4UTIOM 10. ` A WkUTIdNI OF UE PLANNIN COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF �' I 5 RANCHO CAMON",, RECOf�NI i�r �APPgOVAL OFD, DEVELOPMENT CORE iNiMEiiT rr'04, WING SUUSECT, Dk 1 080.070 -C , J a7.a r- ��} AOD�tG A NEW SuBSECT10 t 1i.10.050.a t� THE DEke ,OPME CODE_ PERTAIN t!& c'TG THE PMIMG ANp �• STORAGE OF VE : C 0 " ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WI�THIM TkE ESdDEN4AL,, C CIAL OFFIG£ ANC Iii!?USTRIA DISTNIgTS n w, WHEREAS, on the 25th day of May, 1288, the',Flanfiing ConOssion held' a julV adi':Vtisgd public hearing purtyani ta,� Sectian X5834 of the California Government Ca4,$; and WHEREAS ,),, Jannfing Caewissiall finds it` necessary to amend and ' Cf revise the Development Mode.regulations partatning to tit paking and storage 1y' of vehicles on private -property within the resid�i ial, coq�a ial and { industrial districts; SECTON I„ The Rance Cucamonga TPlannfn Gomisiorr finds ghat `the proprsedi eve opwn Code Amendment 88 -04 is an ia5lentation of the General Plan goers And Policies and that the General Plan Environmeni lop ac+t�.reor adequately covers at�y potential significant adverse 14 0cts. Furthers t Planning Commission finds that no� subsequent or suppligentai enviwo;r ant ._ G � impact reportcis required pursuant to Division 13, -Chapter 6, Saiati,an'�21166 of the Public Resburpes Code. Specificall t, the Planning Cc missi En ffi" t7 ` A. No substaAtialr'eoanges are proposed in any goals or policies Mich would require major rd'visions tb the B. J No substant al ,h ties° have occurred wi th respect to the cir'cum ncgF under,,.which "thee proj;t ct is being ° undertaken, 1 r C. ` No new informat�4on on the proje�,t has become' (' available, "mil 1 - J. •. `SECTION 2s Ti* RanchaCucaorlga Manning Cisio lras found that° this prae�'aiiTi" not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and reco�wlends Issuance of &Negative Declaration an Ifay E5, 2g8S. WOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: ; That ` pub �' 11: Section 65860 to 65855 of :the m i fore i+z Yernmmnt Code, that-LaaOfaming Commission of the City of ,rancho CucaMongi hereby recoimends auprovaV of Development Code,. Amendment, 8841 amendinr Subtection.r�7.*.'0704 17.1"'030- S,,�nd the addition of Sub3ectior 17.10.090, n 0 as follows:` � I io 1- 1 `O„ a. UkRNIitf CWISSi6n- Ae:-OLUTIO'W kq, .. Qevel op�,� ��� �baenc�ment �_q,T i - �._.,�__:..:� i T '..1�fyNS Sodrsectioa 17; YId.�37" (Ts tel: C« Yehfdi% Parking, The parr ing of vt cld$ in all w" resi'denli`ai i"4ricts shall we Subject -W the foilwirg G c, pro Otions. 1.� the design ui�e'iinOS, and reguiaVions Ion, parkin areas shall Ito 6rm to ihe�provis� ns of Chapter 17, ,I o of tim 1Se+re i nt Code; u 2. Yehicte paKtng ihatl 0btiin the iasdar.;' y r carport or Esther quired 'or authorized �€f- tiii. P moved parking area; 3, ,. ,Kll parking areas within public" vipra frosa the street; publir right: -of�- or ad4acent properties shall be =' paved 'With 4 Pem"nent paring mafi 1411. Stich Area, ' shall be maintained fp a gseabll condition) fre aim pottwleS and :broketr Secfii,as� . Suff Clent \� prev 10 arxrd andVor dust, without acct atian`rrf loose mtterta't,or ° other de rinratian; r� !� r 4. Y sles pbrke�a or itor"ed khe side or rear yard gray #dud mat such area is 1cswd' firom -view f1,04 > the Street,. - pablic riyn of -rraur ark t�[jacent propertii�,s by a0fertce, wsall, ix lent S ping - materiat at leash five (5} feet in iseig'ty Q Yehicte parking, w in-sii acrd rear yar�€'areas shall / be limited to fivilUent"f%) of the total Jot area r or five hundred squtr� feert,trhiche3rcr is greater, . unless to6tr�upted pursuant to an approved - Minor Development ReView;'. _- 1 a�i,' ceptr as rbvided fat Subscj + S� herein, vehicles (sparked �s W publi Aliew in rsquired or authorized, 1 parking g,;xithirp f� front yard, corhar side yard or Side hard ..ttin a °r$reat sEruTl iH+ patrkad or.l€t standing for aorary periods rf titres to exca = five i5 cons' Utiie days, P „ 7. *Vehicles" as used section"Sha,1 " c1`�e,1,but .rot be lim , d ta, °c « rcial vehicles, au trailers txotor LruiGs sf lead l tn>cycles, iaxrpeds .argrers; .:a arshells, Yts orb= %b r Dirge. Wtable recreational atrd, ` c rcftl V equ�pttle$t; acrd, fl r c 4 J, i.A!#Mi�a�. FSSiO#� 9V (i ,Devel opwnt ,Code l rxienc,88 -p4 G �C e 4 8,.' _No cowercK v+ c`i r 'raiifie ,exceeds �irr xa w� ght of one one- a,�rif f I nd / I tons,no"x ds A, Width of of rty (00) inches hr, exceeds a b ^3ght of sevort (7) feet or exceeds 1x "longih .otf • p,ntjyt- #v* f } `fto; no �. specialized work .relxi^�i ,wh'Icle fe,gr i "trucki \l - �, " stakebed trocks,j etc.1 ark no "sgecial("rxed +ork rataQted parts l' a tipMetr ra.D. ae"Ot Aral, tra iers�:; e }� s}iall be 10airked on aq ptrattion of 6. 04ntfatl io� Unless: fx it is actively #afivr king s,a' t'#n �p�► - sick -ups and,de)iverias; „. {) in C: Lion xrE , AN a and to the parforraaincat " a sarv, "�;a, td, qs on fie'-) :: r Mproperty wrhert�. the vahic1*91s parked!` owed to i4ch or f�� °fh r'olif aaCe � with , twR cG %ions of �'�tr.' A z f4 , � �,aPi� mare c'S theuDsve o g t k�s pro v+dod In S*cCUq' t k1, of 9. No ` private, mmn- co"aier,. Jai %%hide A#ch oxcee a gross might of one and ` . e-hAl f , (I ar;d 112 r�ohs or c a ids a width of di ` r v : (80) ,4ncF.as, o� xcsa�s a ,) heigi�,, of Oven i e, et or°..ex enotk of f ` ap�t� five f 4) i �yt,7 and «noy traflie, semi- tr�4ileyr,, v tl O .bona or porta:bb i-Ras l ��. OIA � �'G''^p�`!i�'S�c �h�# 4 S be `1 a parked or ►red wi' irr. site `i'r rt yard, torus? be { yxr -fir s1 * yard abutting t, str%�,A unless: (1) it Is iak aA cosaaerciai vah #olat_ and is parked for a rary period of time nqt exceed• tarn four.: � (24 hours; 2)" it, ix M Fa ed Kba6i Dr'" �. °uniaa�ling a�,t3 itY�, ain�i �� <<,�I t �ina _ cs }•inch mr#ar�y other sPF�erdiriara PD. kiO'w"ion of any of this s tan A I be able Ar arVnfractt'on;. Ubsect*M I?`.MOWB($),.,(Ar'J4rM3ted? 8. A ser rOaq paved drib^ ° 7� y yy J ��*. or:. exta:�rk�idn� #.S.ai P� x iv�ltruy shall not kk: used` for ;�ri4 #l�s or�a `arc ssn poi } Arb� { � ` g of #.e Gib 1, \' drV with a +Y 1 ^�`iC►u'eppR �►ava�rerrt dtrt not exceed #r<� ��, ' ;I ft Is,,arrk,ex6t*W3y4on 'o€ '.* W iaayry l :' the rear,.L *liG�k F R�ril Y can;�rwlctedt2r~�ti i ¢ �' ! approved Yir',eate a - of ^.., `J: • ' �' � , �J �,. U 'iJ7 'r 87 Q2 0 5. 25 88 PC Agenda o . 'O:UTIM) PLANNING CoF9 ls$to"'A Nop Development Code Amendment 88«04 ; Page ?Sn Subsection V.P�05" (New 'Sectionj; e Vehicle Parkin . T;re parking of vehicles.. in all Sosaaera'1`ai o �� and '4ndustrial -districts shell be ubject to the f; owing" OrqviSionxF 1. The design dell, net, aqd Agulations far parking facilities shall cbnfor'm to. the - provisions of Chapter Q 17,n of the Development Codv and any applicable provisions of thg, Industrial 'Specific 1411; 2, ' Vehicle parking 'shall 'be within buildings, ga�;ages or other - required or authorized off- street,paved parking facilities. (( v 3, All parking facilities within public view from the street �',Wblic rightrof way or adjacent property shall` _ be paved with a perms�ent pavfng material. . Such (Greta shall be maintained in a oseablecfcondition free of potholes and broken sections sufficieni„sto prevent mud frt l and /or dust,witfia accuaxulatior! of loose materia other deterioration; 4. No vehicle' $half irbrked for thy` purpose of displaying such v r46�ro fear_ °sale or other- comercial activity, includitE4t �1:i liarited to, lease hire,' advertising, etc »� ,�#e vehicle is Oar•ked by'1 or rr with the written , r s i rn of,o a. business in the o} property which is i% 1&d licensed and, approved to ' Mplary 'pz(r`�pase3; vehicles f r` i h > 5:. No (Yekicle shall be ,parted far the purpose of repair or maintenance unless.1)' such work is performed an vehicles owned or operated by the on-site business within an enclosed, building or aria screened t'oo 4° Ird view from the street, public l!ght'•of4AYy, adjacent. °t propperties nd required off- strAt parking facilities -in r with public access, or (2) caksnection writla a bustrtess permitted to perform repair or, maintenance of ' vehicle,4 and only during established business hours, 6. No vehicle which ., is disabled, ,, unlicensed, unregistered,. inoperative .or from which ",In essential _; }t or legally required operating ().an is<,remavao or shall 4 parked within public , vied* from , thi ' public ri'yht- .way, adjacent pra rties of, required~ offristreet parking facilities w lip public access* O }�o ry ; <` tj , a -1-7 1­7 lopment Code hmeadvoe6t W014 POO 5 7A No ial, vehicle e XceedIng gross *eight of on# an =f_ I and 112 to Wing -width ns. or excei a of o ei0ity (W) inches. or'a rA ee 6- t I $hall 4t,- park4 within r,,��44 fffq,� district efteen; (1) it is ed fe Vloo( frc* the strget�) public rlqht�.O.wayy and-- Ot properties; 'it is actively invof�e'a iw *k1ho pick-u and d*li rin., or (3) in �connectioq,, with, and n � aid td'. .31MW performance.` of a �servft to# - or on, the -pa PrOpCrty wbire tha,� Vihicle is d., while acti involved in such Attivi rcifis "vehicles, as, used in Sectfon shall include, but not,be limited to, commercial Vehicles, automobiles, trucks� troiler.%, t��-,fsator t�ucks,, sftt-trailers, Notbrayties, mopeds Irt, cam pir shells,- boats or, Q I Ticea* other, large ab lvthatfinal or coamercial Wt TOW% _311 9. Violation of Ay pr6v �Si on� of this s I 44,64 on Oall be AIL 2,��j ',\7hat a Cer*tifled�copy of, iiis �Osoiutlq'fl, and relate& wAterial hereby adl�� `N� h he P14naing 90MUstoti shf,11-be forwarde to the, City Council. Z) k 3 Ihe PUNIng CoWision -hereby recommendm' ttw, ci that ty Council qprove and pt qaveloprent tode A"Moont 88-04,as i�taik te-tafn, A to PPR D AMI) AWPIED -THIS 26T� DAY" OF MAY, 1988. PLANING C SION,OF CITY OF RAKHO CUCAMOWA BY: Larry T.,Wcglel, pairmon ATTEStt grad BOW, veruty Secrevitry o CITY OF RANCHO CUfA,MONGA STAFF REMU "DATE. TO:` Chairman,nd Members of the Planning G'triwmission f'ROM: Brad,,Buller, City Planner BY: C�)thta S. Kinser, Assistant -Planner r. SUBJECT: MINOR DEYELDPKNT RcVIE1i 88 -00 s SEIFERT An appeal of '' s Sff's -decision ' eny a" mo - ' ca a of miat.B r' ,: t for tine building elevations "of an existing, office building Within tho"100iceEProfe'ssiohal diptrict ?ocated- op the east side of Hellman south of Base Line - APR- ,208-4J1 -28. I. ABSTRACT: An appeal oe staffIs decision to deny a modification of 4 e au rming.elesvations to include blue. tile and awnings at 7333 Hellma 2Pvenue, .I. BACKGROUND: On febr°u4ry 9, 2988, the' oppet+t' owners tiled Minor eve opment,;? *view 88 -08' requesting �a If cations to the build", elevations, ` h� applicant wishes to ch ;e the 9sistt'nj'red- oran�� tiles zrrm to tile„ a blue and to ad', blue awnings around tdie windows. The proposed' mocifications were .referred to the Design° Reuiew l Conmmittee by the City PlanneW. on Pe ,. ,gry, ,18, 1088 the Design Review Committee this iecom�e�ded reviewed applj,:atlilui aria a. rust color for the the and awhings* Wch wgUld be more.conpatible with the existing.buildina elevatiars. and tile. The Comittee wps alto concerned with the ^U0 .onO instal=ls sior. method of : tht Awnings . - which may—not Withstand *,,strong winds of the Lfty andcouid cause a safrt hizard. The applic4nt found the recd endations 'unacceptable and requested',-, the :@lino, bevel opment review be denied, to allow the - ,applicant to proceed wi,4, , 0" appeal to.: the Planning Comis$ian. tln'"aroh 23,, 1988 =the City 1lanner denied Minor R�evelopment Reviee. 88=p� ;(See, Exhibit B). In a letter dated March 28, 1988$ =the appl-lcarit requested than Minor Development - ReY,iew 88 -05 be appealed to the Planning Commission (see Exhibit C)« r, t' III. ANALYSIS,„'jThe subject office building- was originally a snish. style ouse that was converted into, an 0610.structure,. In 19 79 . the City reviewed an 'application for a two story garden office: :i building to the east and a gas station imwdiately to the north, _ ; .' At .that time, the issus of m0patibility between the proposed gas station office building `in relation to the existing office ,ants IF PLA14NING CONKISSION Sl F RERORT NOR 85 8$SEIFERT 05 May IA 88: Page 2 building arese. As a "condition of apprcval the new strucu;es were required to faring out basic elements of the existing converted office, such is wood sidinry, white stucco pilasters and red tile. -The gas station, when - -burr;,,, brought tbese'eleftnts nt6t its design ;A Za story office balflding arcs buitilt,sunder-L( separate approval, at:a later date.` The office building has a white stucco exterior,, and red,z crannel signs to relate to the orig na'l "SSpinish sty3lding. t >` Ear this- year, the Design. Review C*fttee reviewed the proposed U add of blue vindow awnings frog; -4don� and $$fie ch.2noo _,red- oraange tale to OWO tiles. The Committee found._ f I proposal inconsistent with' the existing archftecture ,. tti co` or: tWnga would curate Aft ) incoaapatflxle :appear akb betwdin ,ehe '. structures. Ue "Comeltoe therefore, reco aded that if a chahre were to occur, a rust co'ior . would be more cotpatible., it it 'was a, further i � ,dkeea the coomittee that the,,propmsed 'ati� fng , material and method of �°- �if�.PAlent' would not withstand the strong winds of the area, The Omit a therefore reC` 5W! a more durable rus,,t color material "with it sturdier mounting* �.. . :. Minor Development Review 80 -05 was therefore dedfed blsad on-. the � following findings., i., Tpst the proposed awning and tile cover would not be'consistent, With the original colors of the building "which served to enhance *he bulldingr wit{ surroundiry:..elemeots. 2. The Proposed color, change, would not comply with the building a; design. guid•.lines of the Oevelopmtnt Code (Section 17-10.060.2.0, which °"specifies that -olors and materials should be''roordinated to achieve total, come atibilfty of design, They ° should blond well with the surrounding environment and not cause abrupt changes. 3.. The proposed awning material and mounting would not ;withstand the strong winds of the area. IV. REC06NENOATIONt Staff t%5o�amends the Planning Commission deny this PPea o nor Develoj ht Review 88 -05 through adoption of the attached resolution. if, however the Commission determines that the proposed Modifications are accoptable, there direct staff to prepare a Resolution with findings for adoption at your next r,ee rig. . t t r Cr r CCTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11"'n Q!: Mc �aL RaecM Cuc6nenFa. Cablcmia9 "3o, t "1�� 4f4.1E {I 44arch 23, .1968 #, Cawrence`A. Seifert 7333 Hellman Avenue _ Rancho Cucamonga.,; CA. 9V30 r, SUBJECT: MINOR DEV,.,LOPMENT REVIEW J Dear`Mr. Seifert: The Planning Division, :hereby ;denies Your request for the reasons discussed herein. in order to' approve the ;Minor Desvelopment Retie;++ request'. certain findings; in ti a affirmative most -be substantiated by ' facts to support . those findings. The findings - l,1�:Ld t�;g fislirrwirg; FiND114S = ," 1R !hat the praposed..usq is in „accordance �i` ih the objectives of the Development, Cdde, the purpose of the ciistric,t ,in which the side is located. ..Z. That the proposed use, together with ,the conditions 'applicable thereto, will not be detrimental° to the public health, safety, or welfare or matertalli injurious to,, properties ar,Jmpr0ve enft in the vicinity. t 3. That the proposed•use will comply with each of the applicable Provisions of the Development Codey r 4. That the proposed use is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. . Based upon staff`s review of the proposal, it has been determined that the facts to support findings one and three cannot be made in the positive for the :following reasons: 1. -:That tY,a �Yoposed awning and the cover- would not be consistent 'with the original colors of the building which aerve;to enhance the buildings compatibility with surrounding developments: 2. The proposed color change would not comply vdth the building design guidelines of the 130velopment.Code (Section 17. 0.tr,CBD), Which specifies that Colors and materials should be Coordinated to achieve total compatibility, of design. lbey_ should blend well' with the surrounding, environment and not cause abrupt.change�t Hr 14',-4 K64 . ;..r . f i R : • ' .i h .:r 1 11'rel•t ' C '� ti �t'at.C^sta« .� �1, P la��Axrqmz ' JJ; o i G. 1-44' i4 n RESOLUTION NO. o JJ; i A RESOLIl1'1OK OF THE RANCHO CuCAMN" PLANNING COW41OR " DUYING AN APPS& OF MINOR DEVIE OPMENT REVIEW Nil. - O.N.0a LOCATED 7333 HELIMM AVENUE IFt "THE OFFICEIPROFESSIOKAL uzsrRrcr, APli 2Q8- 431 -28. A. "Recitals.�, (i) Lawrence �;eifert has filed an application for ti* approval of Minor Develo nt Review No..', 88 -K ,as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in`thft Resolution, the subject Development Review I request is referred to as "the application",; (ii) On the ':25th of May 1988, the Planning r4mmissioh of the City 1 of Rw.; RESOLftION` PLANkN %,CO MISSION , 88 -05 May 25, 1988 v Page 2 i ~—(a) �ihe proposed awning material and mounting T would not .withstand the strong winds of the area. Y 3. Oas d upon the substantial evidinca presen�ed to this Comm sston" during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts �i fiet forth_- in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and yr5ncluoes follows i (s) That :the proposed Is not in accordance with ; the objectives of the Development Cade, the purpose of the district in which the site is 0 located. (b) That t use, together, with the 4,'=ndition,i applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the P614c, beal:th, safety, or ' w,slfare or materially injurious to properties q, impeoveaaeots in the fnity. (c) That the proposed use does not comply" with eauh the applicable provisions of the Development ~ -)of ,Code.cap WYThat the proposed 'use is r consistent wfth the objectives of the General Plan. 4. Basod upon the findings and eoncloions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and '3 above -, this Coeatissicn, hereby denies the. pplica. ion .subject to each and every 'C'001ition set forth below and in .attached Standard Conditions attached tereto a4d incorporated horein by this referi`►nce. 5. ` The Deputy $kretary to this Commission .shall certify to the adoption of his0Res0lutio ;.. :.y APPROVED AND ADOPTEb THIS 261N DAY OF W 1988, PLANNING COMMISSION OF YNE'Uff AC RANCHO CJCAd O c,A BY: arry T. c , a` ri- ir`skn �. A7gST; o Brad Huller,_Deputy- secretary w <S O�.UTION PC.1�.M011%COMMISSION 843"06 CS . May 26, 1980 t '� o ui Bra�ulior , 5ecretar of the Planning ` a sSion of city of Ranchos n- tree^+�Gyr-ii�u LisOt►ftit�srs�rir — ° "_ a regulate %tru ed, pW d, and adopted by i m oPlmtng, Ca s "on °QT tNa ' 0�� City of Ra do Cuc acrrr r e regular seeiip of the Ph* -! ;g Comaissfon holf`n on the 9th day of Nayr 2 9, by the following vote. oc;4t: 5 AYES: � c C€€MMISSiOMlERS: ?� � ROES. COWISSIONERSt �l O J v i t n CITNrW RANCHO CUC#Ut?NGAa TOO FORT DATE: May 25, 19$8 1, TO Ghairsw,% and Members of the Planning.Ccasaission Aow Brad Buller, City planner SUBJECT. Iti'MRIN MRICULTURAL UIES/USE ETtRHIHATIOli � a Staff Is seeking, policy direction of ,",: merit aMIcuttgral uses In no'h- residential districts. .,I Staff has recei ad ,an inquiry as to the use of a vacmnt parcel at the corner of �,FoothlW Boulevard and Grove Avenue for the 9rd6ng of $trawb& ;4keS. The Development diode 4110 "s 'such Ah activity.,,; as an Interim j--3e in residential districts but has' n0 specific provis#nsas. for it is non - residential areas, In Commercial districtst, the Coda= dne allow frtk and vegetable sudsy (subject to a Te oraiy Use Permit) and "ussr�s milor °to thors abo��e-as de "ermined by the City:Plarner" (see EW�tt "A "#. Staff behaves that a strawberry field °constitutis a %Nllar use ".s and that such 'a use 0 shr ±Id be permitted in non - residential districts a�At is in residential areas. Existir lations dealing yfth noise �kr) dust coniv;ojp Mould dpply., -, _ RECW4&DATIOR. Stiff is requests . confir ion" that limited intom's t;= ag� icul r`aT uses siatilar to thow, al[ eM + peY*itted in, residential areas, are also appropriate in comertial, o °rfive, and - industrial a�eas. . No change In the Development Code would be necessary., In that these uses would be deemed *similar" -to those already r permitted. Should the CoWssion disagree, appropriate Airection is requested., Respgr#ully submitted; c B d e . City P nner BB. ;a Attachments. Exhibit "A" - Section 3,I.1t.030 li s. 2. Parkim -lot and sidewalid sales: Parking lot and -aidewa , sales or ;A ilea market typo, of operation may be permitted in the commercial dkricts i subject to the app oval of a Temporary-Use Permit as described in Cttapte' 17..04.070 and titeoUowing criteria:. j) } (aj The sale may not exceed three (3) day' L,duvirq any three (3) mouth period, I Am, W The- ,prospective mercha{ must (. n written,, euthoriz$t!� Hof property owner. � ,� Z (p) a activity shall. nest present a hazard te`.pe d3 strigivl or entroach on 7 V'' a,quired building tszit; r _ Jry Section 11.10 .030 J (e) Velt q d pedestrian access is uocrctin &tad and lo&aily Uriked''ta � 1rr6vide comprehensive circulation system; and (f) ~ n the development of a c6tace:ptual ' development plan Which S "e9nsider r r#ucli things as,-,b u$ not limited to, circulation, u }tror ,I > >' arthitect� eesign, drainagelgrading, buffers, phased Wpray� .ienis and land�captkig. _ r G. C Condition Of uses .1. Outdoor displivs end salettof mereiiandssee 'All businesses &411 be conducted Completely ' wawa an encl� ng.. 'the !ollawin dzutdoar sa0es and commercial activities may 06, permitted to operate "outdoors, within their ; respective districts aa?dl €abject to 6y required reviews am permits: l l -boat, railer, camor, and end rentas (a) ,utsnczrie, 1cndtinal Use(subfept to a Permit);,- (b) Huila "v maleriaTa supplies and 4gtjiprt+enC e�utaL and 'sal (s ject to a Cor•��tiQs�$l iFsa, ?�ait� (c) 3 `ru!t,ind 17 table " stands (requires. temporary usr ,sririt); AM (d) Horticrtltural nurseries tsubject to a Conditional Use Permit); ' i (e) riasoline ne (f) Outdoor , , d (g) OutdoorrTcreation uses, (h) Parkbig lot and sidepralk sales (subject to tempoMry use pernti; d f regulations set forth #n this chapters and 4� (i) Other activltie� and uses similar to UM' s above`a¢ dst'ernsii�ed by trier city VRI :`•,. _ . lv..; ..-- =� CITY fsP RANCHO C[3C �fbIiGA � TO:, Chairman and Memo ers<of the Planning Commission l FROMr °Brad' Buller; City ;Planner -- BY: Nancy'fangi, Associate Manner. SUBJECT: EXTENSIIN OF A 09- CONFIRMING itSE F #iR A PROPn$M Pi T LHUAD T. ABSTRACT: The develo eA.H. Reiter \ OeV61opment C(X±t --is reggjiesti ng for Planni6o Commission consfderation to "dt'!` v X11 expansion of a non - conforming use. 11.- SITE 0MAICTERIST'ICS:, The, ,sftd is zoned Ofj4ce /Prof(WMona1 and $ formerly con a ne a non*con6ntfing industrial building, - Bennett Industries. - * , s _,has been demolished. Si Ott remains >on- t13e site - are Jx_,4datiol, scrap metal, concrete debris, etc. A portfan of, r the,/,Xte, is. payed, but in need'' of improvement. The City ,Is cu�rentiileasing this area for additional paiking spaces for. 04, vehicles. The site is 40proi4martely 2.7 ncrals in size. East or };? the site is all foot wme abandoned Squthdlprn Pacific Railroad ol spur.line. ' ?'he per fs proposing to acqu9re this rig #xt -of for future 6 e7a nt 'as shown in Omit "W ', The total 'site- area will t4'' 3Ptacres. The Street frontage is approximately 100 feet of �l tp R"d. ;� III. 51i3ROGNGING t�� ttt1�3 EiiEtOPMENI OISTi3ICT!$.- Nests of the''site Is es gna a sue, -se ro Asa one asi, , can t'�lns _.a W#sineii � vark with taro tafxl t��a :l wings `ghat front an Bassi i ins: Road and four non - conforming fi st'enant industHal W1 ings in ' the - r4r. South a:td east.uf Tth0 site Is dosigna'ted as Ge'ndralC Cotanercial andC, contains an existing Southerfl Pacific Ra lroad,malji line, and east of it are several nop-,conforming structures and uses North -of the site is designated cb, Low Residential (2 -4 duelling unfts per acre) smith existing single family —comes. IY. ANi .YM: �.r Oenoral : The developer is proposing to 1 c"ttrdct ' a 44,-5200' square foot f rte and .multi-tenant i du trial p rk, on 3.8 acres of land. ;,The three hffice, bUMVIip �itft centralized _ �. plaza areas. are Manned for it the front of the site with, the multi - tenant industrial- building ,ir , tote, rear•. The developeni S has stated that; t#ie design of this pra�%it'j, is planned to be c Im it f _ PLANNING COMItSio I" F RED Oil 1� NON- CONFORMi�c USE RETTO? DIEVELI..� l' MAY 25, 1988 _ O`ri J C� u isrtegra+ a with h :}sting 64 ne� Business access petnts will ti`propmd with interior ca Ilections.: The arokitectc ral progra.�R Will 6e ; r�onsistent wic� thL axfsting bu ldi s° of, N §e Line Busi�7es Park. �,.is, the . ro�,sed multi -ant Industrial °. building ill' tlye raac X'Fe'cR res ? : '%a't ; �oacn ss o on - sns ra {an lur. suc a,+ ex as co, a non c �a ei ff'usej: `AMc� or.- our re erg ce, Fs a tor ron;T a croE open r.gaiid;1 tfi�ra%re1t. ! jet B. iss� ss or Plannin , CaWrtsiott Con id ration ke ardin . the M°1sloirt.f -the " .%n- An, o nqr UseRe#ueq s'1. � a intent of the t�ev opment'- -Code is tc ,CjMit� the m gr and : the extentrof nah•canfprmin T and otructares by Ottim ans egU11 their *Xpars ei� anzlia�^ a .terry ti s. However, ft- iVtjopent , Code has py-ovistoii� , Whieh proviide °'the opportunity : for, the .. Planning rCoraeijOan t&, mview ! ,equests for expa,, sNn. ' - The. Planning Comission must determine if expan&iti0 ;tre `_non- conformipg stNctuee 'gill be --detelmental '�to the' gpjls and obj tiVes of . ' the General Plan and :, Developoent detriment l tti the : 'publ is h &l'th, ; safet; , or welfari or . materially �nJdrious to properties ear improvements ij the viciflity �r 1. bill the request ✓ detrintel to the goals 'and objectives of the ;Genorsl' :Alan an'd D�,velar :nt dada? " the site was `origirally ; zoned fo^ nustria? use : } , prior to the City`s'ncorporation. After de k3opment. r: of the existing Base tine. Business Park and rsith the adoption r~f " the Cityxs General Plan and Develbpment Code, the site fneludingr rthe Base,Line Rutiness Park was ` rezoned to tfficePProfessional. `fihr: recent ;.., demolition of,Bennett Industries industri'a'l baailding' 4 will,facilitatc redeve;opoent that could ` comgi -y with thtr current;General, Plan and ftVilt-Onwit D strl.ct designations.` In revibuing_ Vie'' -ject, staff 'finds that V5z "_,,,site ' does Have Lens `'pints sash ::s irregular shape -ana limited street..,Ift.tage where° Bevelopfng It , . separate,, entity would be dii ct,lt.. The,*gst lo,ical and best solution if, *,o.:integrata it with .tire pass Line Business Park. ­, S Fk�, finds that 'thj dntire ' devexoMent, can be designed `,vrith the'apparza ce :of op `r office park. - -' The poly eXLnptinn.Would be -`the detj4n of the multi-teriaot buildilig with roll -up dOorS In the" batik•, , yUyLL� ;itN_NcYR�iG�2��y�. R( { bbL�6_I. _ Page Pe C!miissioi' roceptly aporoved an, `asAendisarit to the terra 'vista Pla oed townity to allow op�nt `sdeve a bu9iress ark ., with similar Ttf ^tenatft., ,. buildings. The Cc4aissio" deliberations Iocus6d upp�i_- tthe types of uses that would be #77owed. to, occupy t(e buildin s, ".TM iisoon ultimately deteru�imed t�s Lt industr7al uses were inapPrg0H,!te and`restricted the allowable usas 'Lo office and business, support uses., "The applmeAt has't,submitted a list of proposed uses . oh tti s to d -e xhi 3 "E ") . Staff connote final`r 6M.` ttio Without adequate time to anal the prop�a5� use for similarity to uses allured in ; the `"�'fi`cefFr f!: isna7fi gistrict� Qoes F expnsion - tenant' - 2. s� �aslvef3e3yaepaet the surroundin6 prqpw--Ves3 s ,ms And 'west qf= : the 'sfie are existing office and ' r iti'Opant business ',parks and non- eofiformfn4, structures and u;et. respectively. ' Th'e develop nt of ,." the QroieCl. ;;J d, Plate this block area -' Whereas y the exi5ti *g ilti- tenant industrial parr 4 cks up to ` a 'C0naalt"4Cent 'oboe, the orientation a tee. proposed multi =tenon , b4ilding Mould back up, to existing single farm .residences to the earth - ,which may .r. create sraa conflict, sad° attenuation wall, and dense Ia6asCe #Ifig could ;bi U,. sed as a seitigatio;i. "owned The remaini4i ,,, &nd o€' the abandoned raif spur V V by the Souti?°rn pacific Railroad northeast.of the site Areas A and 6 as 'shown in Exhibit "8 "j' is r, desigo4ted ' ec Office/ Professional 'and General, - ConmeNtal DiOr ttst staff is concerned with how, these panels iail7 do. elop under, two different °Developent district designat3uns; access, and .: circulation.' The, "de-volo er stated that be has ' attempted rra acqu f re Are' -- A. however. the Southern . Pacific Railroad ro$octed ,,the proposal. Staff recommends, that Master Planning be provided to ensure that fv*e redev0opment"of Areas A andr 8 WfTI not ' be hindered by this proposed project. All sltes Mated teuhni4eal and desion , Ismest., a 'Including Sze rtn ann n an rec rs►ca'" ,access Cos! - rel ewe ckn resolved v r ev +ew process at fie me of, oriiia, apt Ca on« A? , t. A.H. REITER" DEVELOPM NT ti April. 18 1988 C1 Mr. Stad• Bullet " City plarnne'r rr Planning Department city Rancbcncaoong Post !Off to Bor., $01 a 3�ant�h�a giaa�,aziga f CO3 i forma 91730 Subject. planhinj Cc tissid'st Ittterpr+etAtion Regarding Expaz�ai4n; f Baseline Business park F. Dear Brad. ` you may recall for the past several months tie have beezi in t ie ftocess Of planning sn expansion to the 1�sseline Susiness <=lark, oux-jnteot is to acquire appraximat:elyr an sddit3q€sal 3.8 aeres.oi_ property dirotly east of the existing sit ftilatd develop An expand*d b:01naaa "park which would include act additional 44,620 square fe -eE of `both office and multi wtatnon busi�sesla This busftesa park* would be d signed compatible with the existipg Baseline Buniness' i� ,Srk complex, After mee�tang, with this ttn�f* it 440, £a It "that. to proceed with "Plankng this , saite, we ought to eceivg sn ntespreta4 tion by Abe Planning Cra!", aion- an th xtatt`gion of uses within %: ie petit ;b�inesstk. ThO Staff felt that while the Fr9oct is a✓ goad it. heeds t e interpretation of th �Olanning Coaxmfesien for the extetsaixoa of sit�ilat uses. �` fide : to Vass origin4l.ly zoned fret Industrial Howevier, `alter the devel.opmant of the ong inal ` aselfne" Buz*1esst Park, the area was rezo " to`afffcef ra£pssi pal." Thin icsac�urred at a time w1he 4 th; -' City had little, if "a y ,,,r new ��fflce activity and was looking to .heater greater '' raft,i a develo ment,,- tt wit rezoned prier to the Widespread implJ lerKation of thi4 UOustrial, $peeffic plan's use develop- man ri.ter�a�; Mailing Address: P,ttreoz 7M • t�@Yr — rt " , Cgiifomi+� 9!iZ72�i • (714) 1151 -4504 F Pu3ftnal at Re,thill j Mr. Brad Buller - April 18, 1988 Page '' W ° The inten* of the ro ect Is to 'bring 'cogeti�er the remaitring parcels of land held< by the Unnett Industries and An abandoned railroad' -spur to; unify __ cohe iv`c �devalupnmsnt of bo'tbY,thig site and the Baseline Business patk into ` a series'af office and multi•tooant• buildings designed architecturally c<�patIble`..-, Access. to the site would be through common a�cc2as pots 'setvir�g both parks located at the eommocn_boindary"<Ure- ' 1 �4f Ou�C pV"rIPo§e is; -to prds st the best possible ioW�ia� for divelog�, n� this difficult Vi�op+erty. Wile tbis�O to is ` � not within the Industrial SgecifIc Plan, it is A intent to use those standards typically found for multi �n�xnt and office: park devo..'d`pments; �We see this site a- logical r Q extension and tompletio of a very difficult piecesYo£ to develop.:.. TI—P.4 property quite clear tha�t.teitbout• s, 4: ° combined devel- 00saent proposal betwesu both Baaelina �3ua1nQS8 Park an3" this aite, vary little, if stay, developmant could { occur on the vacant parc6l, . I would hiker this hatter to be considered on the n available Planning Commission, 'reel free to contact me for any questions or tomentelyou may have.' ' Sincerely; A.11, kEITER - DEVZLOPMENT, G. *J Timothy i, Beadle Wide Prosldsp,t ` Planning:.& De'siva ence. (Site Pie P _1 14 4) p cc. DCo�� a�a (wldncs. ) f Senirs� Plenuer , - � : Nancy Fong Associate'Planner ,a Aor � Fkrr�astarxi ASSpci�7ian �� � _� 'rox �.. A0 °41pmGn¢ 'GIf3 '2 t - Ai8 BA46 rax a:4 y9rre � t50Gt I �l lI d Omni .ir) y 1 u fief x # fk'IY f7iZ'7DX4 Rapt& m 1#7 ivax u �r'{gll /- w f 70x: 'y CoMs'Y '{:'S,. 1/�Y` (..? � "� gltl . "x170• Z _ �! y r � 0 (Alr ,4c! l �,(L 4 S 9'[s(•y �L�1p" �f^� y J ! Ira POSE LMW Yt�i! _• L_. ..... s e9 43' Y NORTH CITLY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALE: !'� -1 llS gxrs 7ffi iso 4177 9717 49 b' A' OO fl rl 0 �. 9 see u fief x # fk'IY f7iZ'7DX4 Rapt& m 1#7 ivax u �r'{gll /- w f 70x: 'y CoMs'Y '{:'S,. 1/�Y` (..? � "� gltl . "x170• Z _ �! y r � 0 (Alr ,4c! l �,(L 4 S 9'[s(•y �L�1p" �f^� y J ! Ira POSE LMW Yt�i! _• L_. ..... s e9 43' Y NORTH CITLY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALE: ��9 J fill. ig ( E"' na :-�EW LA -3, f/ i t i �. o 0 A.N. REITER OEVf �O `MENT _- May 18, 1988 Mr. Otto Kroutii Deputy City Planner � City ofRancho Cucamonga w 9360 Baseline, Ste. B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9170 o n Subject; Uses within Disselin€! Business Park Dear Otto, I" As a followup to our earlier convenstion, you have suggested that I provide more specific information rsgaxdi g potential uses in the multi tenant business section_ of Baseline Business Part, Wi are not able to find a precise laid use category with similar uses in the Development Cote, bu have to borrow from the Industrial Specific Plan. I have taken the sub -area 6 category for Industrial Parr and further restricted the uses eligible for Basohns Business Parr in the multi- tenant business: section. Xeep in mind that the area containing these uses would only be a minority of toted avodlnbie space. The wining building space would be occupied totally for office eAd administrative uses, 3 We feel that these uses, either its a permitted or as a conditional use, would be restrictive enough to allow the center to operate as an office and business � comple similar to that which currentl in Baseline Business Park L Sincerely, Timothy IBeadle Enclosure: Subarea 6'Use Definitions cc: A2$i = Mailing Address: RO. Box 7250 8wh, California 92658.7250. (714) 751 -4594 i} RI s i mitts n i r BXAMPI;X L{r,V4MMJ.:.N UVi7►7 '•". ,... r_'. ll Land Use=Oesignation Industrial Park , Primary Func tion the function Of this area, Is to provide) for 'office development and upport adminlAiitiwh Services for in stc�i l rer3OW activities. ; `bmicpa+ent in this Subarea V(fTi 'provide for the high quality character assbciated, With *Ortice Park*, hype dor�%pment. Subarea. s is located an both east and West, $1 dos of (S Haven Avenue WOW ng, y south from Arrm to 4th : Street. while sting ave so �x reanufattprtng uses exist e u around the.'AT s SF track, the area is substantiatlly undeveloped. In the future; Haven Avenue will serve as a "jeer access and gateway to the City. Permitted Uses Custom KjnUftrctur Administrative c:!14 Office o Professional/Uesion Services Re rch cervices: Li� ifolesale, Storage and ,01stributfo �tglding ftintenas ex Services inest Supply R sil rSAles'and Services Business Support , '' .'P 4 Communication Serviv :. Financial, insurarce,inti Rte'# Estate Services vow{�xJ yi V XAarini'atrativ+e Civic 5ervices Conditional Usasry ive Ronntal/Leasing WA : $ jop��y�e y� P'9'R'O �U; M��a Hea ► Sara ". «n � Persona l StrVices _ Recreationtt Facilities Cultural „> Public Assamrbly Public Safety and Utility Services Religt6us Assembly - Bodhill 7 a v EP TO: Beard'LLof Directn,5 F'ROft: Danais ti Mi chaeS Fire; Chi , �yloyci' H. A1ma�scpiviaicz Gh`ief /��"re Marshal SUBJECT; .:Adoption of C:mmezial /2ndustxial Automatic' Fire 'Detection �, and ;AA61(lat a� `ire = Protection "Systs�n Oxs3inanee �;' D 1TS: .April ,J 1986 -' ~ s> t RECOMMENDATION It is the staff's readmmenc aLion that. the ordinance £'Vr ntomat'ic fire det ictiorr and automat;, fire y protectinh system re` 3da fed, as .proposed, �� p, I r BACKGROUND Z; The propose ordinance -beg braug'zt�tt� '+u at this tsm' relate s only to commercial and industrial_;Duila,a`gs. The =xe dent ai portion, which was to- be part `oE t?�is packager has begs deleted" from the ardinancg,provisinns at°th,�s time. The commercial. /ifiduotrial -as�ct was �amrct' \ the 'last' halZ of 1 87 "and, finalized during ­6 special special gaturd'ay meeting held on a uary 1J88, The,propo'aed ordir *Jce before YOU is a result'` . of 'that meeting ava. includes tt'= , nd' effect of the c�Z lcussi ch he3d, that day with , Contractors_, deveZ.opers, the BIA anl�.. the .ftildin* anri ' Safety* piv3sion of Ranches Cucamonga..' The original intent ryas to include the residential portico i.n ` this draft, but ,1 am xxnable to offer that to You "at this time. The major reason for its exclusion is the 'letter `,-fl-'received fromt-an attorney for the BIA (see Attachment A). The,­;;ole intent. behind the ;letter is to infer that the dire does not have thee, legal right to adapt ordin;%nces. 'his letter has been iven to our Dist?, fiat's legall counsel for his interpretation.,, o oU 0 z, 0T ' �r-may "J U Ad''aption ai-rd3nance a l ,age Two Although ve do nod have a writ as as yet, Iris initial xesearcn indicated Wa, as �A . rire bistri,ct, do hire :the legal,' zzghT to adapt rtrdina :es spa�ific to our need sr 5peci,f c guide - lines for suci? "adoptiChQ, are in the 40vernment Code, , Th guidelines', rbavej, and alwdys,, will be, Followed. by this 1Di�tirlct w :en ordiiianco`s arse; adopted.. _ 'buring our first meetxng:'c?n r xuar to, lg$4', �Tith the zesiaen tial task ;:.forcer repx11 sentative`s of the 131A as),-Ad , if .we would be willi,�g to look at'.> altesnativ'es tb ret��`�eniial sprin lisp 'We advised them that w would, as 10fig as the alterna 3.Ve ccem c plished the same goal. sa .'th,e automatic sprinkler i :works at _omaticall.y and, coptrbli arA,/or extauagstishes the fire) . On Wednesaay, April x. red eived from the wrA representat .ve `- a copy of their alietzr .i.ve P41 atled "Some,;'rire Risk Reductiot Pzogram'r (see Attar zi ent B;$ , sS we will not with �31e residentisl' or:ioµ ia, 3s:'. propose Uhis -alternative given to -1 you for YO.Ar . Uf rma ian and possible sug �3t ,ns relative to .the clusio : off' any or, all of it in s u are ordinance dealing,. ith s nrle family dwellirs fide pr' t`ection. AlthouI4 'not' mee:� q tie intent of ot�,,r o gfnal gal.l ,(wbrk automatically and extinguish fire$, x found their proposal, to be rather creative and informative. As ' you consider the commesci } industrial csraina�ce s;veral r j' items need - to be clar4tied. st, the purpose love-loping ncl j k the ardina'Ace,,k�as to- the I spread, verity and speed of fire spreadr which can occur *$.A Jesuit` of ome sPW- 1al..hazards. t" These special, hazards ihciuder but are not limited t& 'aavprse, strong and sporadic Santa Ana winda, which:, have ranged" rip to 84 miles per' hour. These winjs, =have toppled'�'tr'ees, larcre electric poles (VP to t ,=r -Y poles along Baseline deicing q,-,l recent wild storm) and ' cage Zd dense blowing da ax and $and, a$1 of rn3ch have in - teased the response time of e6orgency ari >�:zatus. The potpinti al for flooding due to the slopi,.%g terrain, a3so 4 caused delays in our xespanding apparatus. Major streets, such as Hermosa, Archibalde Hillman, aril Carneliano along with soMfy IN sections; of roothill Boulevard, sti'Ll act as flood control channels.' t3�`roughout the fire: aistr ct and carry sufficient•`amou4ts 4 of water, .1 using our I Vehicles to slow down consider ly, y ' t Wea #--r _c vnditioalu, such as the ''Santa Ana, winds,.. and il.amr•able s g'etation in the district result in numerous vegetation anci Wild Land fires, which draw - existing ,forces from stsucture protection areas, for extended periods of tim4i, this results in ' extended rartr�ganse times:allioh conti;,,',).butes to greater and property loss in large unspr-i.nklered buildings. � Y C. 9 i f,' Adopts ort'a (�dxr „ante Page Thr _ � 5 IP Five arthe c. e faults trai�sc ray t our r "atrict”, 14hzch have the r x� ly' ' elxm�u�tiug � -the resps�nse .xc�tYteg of i3re potential o tota�. J apparatus r Whici will, a,li6 contribute to ; a gr��7tz,� ;�if� and property lass fromixa I Access fob! firj!�` . apparatus �' is u�nduiy dif f �uitr, due '�'to '��or development in the area; '. which has create' additioTiz;� vehicul ar 'traffic bra surfac4 ' streets; ,adcli,tion i .� tr ff'ic signals nave 2 been installed which;" in most case'sr d nat"eaz oura ethe`movement ;? ;tpf gehiclss thrbugh in ersectionsr isut c wally impedes 'l -the !� �h�aneuvex%ng' of €ire apgrarzl`tus , th ough them-6 median islands have rbeeri and Yaill, cidntinue to .be i,nstalled'',in 'ouz ma *or. roadways causing a 4,, much more --- �';tni,t d access to z spanse . z r� nts Ethan Pr; iously aeiaisted W f es6 , cI'rut� extended response tiiRes, r which contrlibute to e er life avd oraperty leis : dtt;i� 'to ` fi.r�P4 Autos, ,GP fire `�riatectifln vstI. a e. gene �a�iy xec- gn�.ted as the single gram sst- a��xigati6rt measu=e,, ava lelsl :-far ;: ui_ldike}r contents and �e p: ot4= *, n 'The Gommercia - headr5 'ope`"ate on the average of eir��an minutes and control -or extaiguish " "'apprari 4 : mately, 951; of the firea� with two rag less heads operatir� *'; '• Recent znalysis „conducted ,k?y Inclastri. al Risk zx�si rers t3 "L lrl 3 fires iridicated tviat the average insz< arce amou,4.,paid', or each unspri kleredi loss 'cue ,to--,, 3� While that 4' rIfskX4ed area , showed ' �n average �:os�. of $42,575., Because 5f the, care given to design; rietruation; assesnlallr. and because °6f the' rigid approval, ;- pests °required, autbmati : s0: ink +ers are amoi ns 'the most iel,a.able mechanical devices made. z hope, that the foregoing,:in ormatxon v 1] $sssst you as you ~- continue „your'di9.laussi'ons, ,deliberations up including your deoison, . This i.s aft extremely reportant pieceV of locate' legislation thate” jvhen passed,•. sill assist- this fare district in its effort Ito z control fire and save li+�es and pi peaty fox yearn u'o come; na I personally thank the Board for its insight, patience end time` I expended in. the effort to pxOduce W:—* documanto it / Y.. 'PNOSSAMAN, CUTHNEkKN X 'ELWOTT MhAMXa ;ikdYxfiE t0 °Ttitp #CLF31k r - ZX aCelti?�.ar"b%fiCax '- G .rte.; hui,idsig �l�u>ttsg ��ccr�a�i4�a � °I 3aldy View ,Rtagio,n 1 T• Marcfe i Page 2 :(1 _ Zlct Tice a;pparently 93aiMs tO, have° authority no to adopt r axaart#�ea such ai'�thi-s b0od b t' CA%ffOxsti. '&Issfic j and Sa>~ �p Cade F e~ir3cn 2 89;- W:L, �cta tiltdity re ex ncea ',_ are to prnvii i"Ons the Mealtii and Sailer Cofto y u3l othexw4m Specified..) �FMat" R#RtUter 80,4ril;ine-1 y Ad6ptpd in 1961' dial ob �'' Alslbly gran�tti .ls3btr�zct ats ktsv ty to ci w doPt .eni(' OFQa raagonable' 6Minenceaw relating to de:.'tain, aspects as mire. rjovert(`1! i,a�d unL��pre►ae:icn. a' HO�ro er,.,t4rat,etkat'Ce, alan r, with, °tho root ti Ithe ptri aw f mGr, sect- *nz grot$cwio9 District o� r.n Aejz-)1 Wills =ep$alw + t"cis state ,SiWO10tn9,r lik*t yearn r and %)�PX&ced _wit # no AtAutefm in th �fo *f tho Fi,rei o o p{rot!y!,ction District IAOL" of ,19tH (Sect onn '1118 �0 # gt 3i,( which m&Y 0ii, DtithO>~i>6et tU* DIXtr dt tO °adopt Xdinaift- (Secti6m 1386��h)) and to *,zfire prevention ,,gpda by aEarenca "%I(�ti'oxa x,359 ?+ y n 'Yi ilfs this Diistri yrtahet th e oirrii iosa that even these mesa istatutt�>x �a oc�fda 3eics3estt +eeaorit�► pct � J ncdapt# an o rie`;s zc�po eel o &di0iara o+ they courto %eve made it man3 east y Clem, thot ahr uaph Speciali.xeid a�.harSty p 7 fl Z y � NOSSAMAN,PUTONER, KNOX , ELLIOTf Mesm6ta fidum t6 ToiR Uhl, Executive Officer c of Seuthevm California, Saldy View, 'Regiop, r Masch 16,, 1988 o a ire vrotey--t`�on gistt'.I�# i^s eat; r610elr limited in scope z�dl aub3e�t+a,saemtfe`by jenssx iaw ts£ tlSa i ' State, ' Aa =h a d ins = v v r Puf gal rineneial and COnA ion�,�4ri4i�Li' ^ }(1V 76) so .. Ge744PP.3d, 241 ,[l29' Cgl,ltptr, 91121,`' CIasi dealiv; o euplici tly with `;Ite, tpririk -Or, orjivancaK.,,adopted by a f - ° local fire protectibis -af stridt, the stater # USing (Sections 17'910, At and particular =y SectiAn 179-12) and the ,state $estuiatg Standards zRa* (Sections xa4oI a ,,t3; .) snaky it s,teetr that the YTssi arm 8'uildi i q ° C0 and ., Its companion cbdas arer4 jote:nded to Oovoru ltuot matters. = - so requiretttes o the type proposed bi the 6list *ict is £aian# is► t1ibi "aR AoClSdi$a3t� /,s�eCificallx, the court in the Anitttilla Casa ' ESi 6etipn- 1.38 69 is a .onard'i art tit of ' BUthority^; it contrast to th3 very specific provitsivnS of, 17#22e, `1$9'� t' Mild 7L7958 .5 , quCted above. Thus., the: moire specific c, c statutory pr ,visions $ovetn thle ytr eersl saws ECitationxI. ;chs�an` y► delegation ct 7 1VCSSAMAN, CUTiiWak Y.Nt3X m ELLIO3`,), , 4� Momorbndum to Tam xohI, 23WCU 0- Off . _•.• --yV1r iL,1�r'}.ti +M'iiM460!'�F�vf �ievYtM� !..xa- -'�T'�•".��_� _ of Southern California, BailtYl* �`aeF! Rea�t$o�t '� i � Mareh '16,. 1953 P800 4 r` in thin atxeiid itiOU vgGt5.a7l1`i?1122s I} vS;t % tai` 6 Spe6if , ,1 ally limits local replatiors to ueCe -:: Zone OP saes, building ssttteck, taldo n . 6P4 rear card requtte ment"e# 4hd property a ling Ordinance Pao.. 5 ragulat '1'4onw Of theme and, the w1ratific grgnt -Olt reserved local jU riadict*on aA section. 17922 io s6vesry limitwd -*AD. '. PrurtPter j the $imitsd. gra .t of reeserv*,d :?ovar to'local :,14titiss is,; by ietpllcstion a denim. of the gsaa't of any 9raati#r jurlsoiction. � ,ter `et 247.1 � o k 82 _k n A su bstantially identicil argument to that of tits di*triot, tetra was rejec'*d bg Our SUPTeM..9 �"t urt in In M •eLy �, 58 Cal.2d 99'`122 Ca1..Rptt. #57e. -.3�72 'T.;2d $971. she court heVldr ;at pagos 101 and 205 that F.` C -' "haene:vez., as herst t L" �sytislaturet has Seen - fit 4 adopt a 940 ral *them* for-the NOS$AM'` GUTHNEN KNOX 4LiOfT 1 �iXir�6t xndux'tr hs�asaei�t '' ait�atbexn13for7cia,, Ap 0 Pogo v r"Ulation of U, p6rtiaular gieb$ a t, ttea aontr *x oz od6l, loviosti*n oethetea. at 26817 = We mote th&t czar intez 'Vre3tatSon k 34 consistent irith th tf �." haeti 1--'ROy I:} Qm tea _ City :O,�� Furtheyxt a l6091 UUnlcipal :ordiaauce! is i'nvkL idt if it t tcmptw to mpotte add.itioswi requirements in a i'ie ld thatJ9 is 'pxe7e3mysEe ►4 by -gRe neral lI *a. . hoCal lagis2ation in centlic.4. with gexle voil .low ix Vold. Gonfltcts tsziat,, it thef orelinonCe 4 7 f b~bfCQGe 'r c ntrCt+33 Ctn� br - • .. enters an area e3e111y saCcupied br .gr��creeral �E3Wr a *itixex Gzsrea�tY css b wY ix�pl�Cati.QiYa M' 6�af t{ l Vii+ y �'j� , '1"O tha L'lzt%A thatCCBi may eluit at all fzOm thS VAi £wr b huiAdibg S",+atS is 0 io NOSSXMhr , CUTHNm YNO: �tL[OT -- Memorandum to,Tom Kohl, ftecutilyw difics�_*'� - � nuiStS�,ry� xn�uatr�r A�soaiatian , 'of :doUtherA California; i��rctr 2G,�u}QS �` ` page S - r ti N limited to v tUt onz Which W17.1 rsxA -lt jrl imposition of ) the same„ requi'vetnants origirtal -text �70'otion .19tlq., a which ere nacaffini; ete�ti 4�� �SatrtR7 >'c'SimatTdi 46010g!#�� a, or t�pogvaphlcci conGk; iona'' (Satctioh!'' S7vsd.s and 17058,7) bvi even thin requires -the basic authority ,to regulate in This res, phieh fire prat:aetion dirt -ri6ts do not have' as a matte, of lase. ` AO -onl; rlpr"Ahei t aralft of 4 regulaticitt -'ef tt tsa„ thss 6 xerstion. of local at ax L, the court observed in tt�tt �gz►. •.�as,s, r ages to ° ocertain z 1702)+ !Zih* Di nv opinion notod tAnt the -Iistrfct in that, case f4ildd to = avail itself of ttte optioms provided' by 8+rationt� � �CeS �� and 17910.7 l4gi,tiiaatts � �indisag' pesteiai><ag to lt�cai candit'3�it couid,.h�..�a l�aeh made to vtzYi aE+a kinanca. that IL ;their �ffar�ave►r; Wolis ` f have =required reament J+� ,. t court that ththe d3atMi1t 77 G` therik Ind- ,�,bwtr to ado �,. �n ordinancsa at e11. i 3> fih present case, not only d"a th*r *, Appea; to btu no auc k ' Power, but the t iatrict bes offered as bzlei.a for 1v6 inq the iiecepsart 4 -tudi; oo , r. The °doncluaio in the bsn,,dIll cas *, s xe�3�z�orced � b an Qp�nian o thee daitfamia A, 6_04,y Meaner in a ear e 3 emox dum Build= Snd"try A0140c A -ion of Soutbar4. �Ca11forniat _ balder view nep1ori° March if 198 invulvirg another fire pxoteotioil diatci�t se�shing to t� - adopt an or4i.nance under lseatidon 13862* in this instant to raazuizt inat *li ticn.at a kt4t*r Ta**tvoi.r for Cixefighti(� q put P, es a 6400 bulldlni'l sit*. ftp decision and other precedcntg,, tho Attorney aon#r4l t' 04 tW30 find y` *t 7�s#totion 1,3869 `dannot (la,� �, 7 F interpreted so � to au�ho,;pi, *o -the or�t i"A'r� in szuest4cn: ''rhough �s»sv�Ax�raxslad, �h� � stetUt* doe* rat pur sOct to arty r, building i twIs "Xtow Of -n o hing in the 8tste= Housirng zaw that. "Ould authotir,*, fire psi +t ►ci isas di.stxicts to adopt eloh '- buildino #tondard Ordinance.* r NOSSAMAN. CUTRNM AMOX U4P Memorazidum to Tom xohlt. taocutive O�fiaer BUi3r3iaag xndUStry Association �( 1 o£ SoUthestx Caliiorai.a, Baldy biov Re On \\ 1,J hg6, "Be Page 4 , C. IRx*rnmaut 1 h u iia ; v;. �Zvvn if some nut grit coul,, carted £oi' �i,. _ 11 adoptions,of such an ordinance, or ilia similar ordinance were proposed to bt4 adopted by the city of Rancho Cucamonga or the Count� Of son Brrnwraino, such proposed action WOU14 still suffer from isesfious legal d iciencies, First: a c£tl* of county np,,;d encounter the name � limitations imposed by the State, � -sing Law with regard to ther.prin y of the Vnifortn Beeilding,Code. 'Their ability to Vary from the standards cdatainad in that Code, would require the sspme findings and Justifications under 1 6ection 17958 or .Sections 179,5 .n and 1795067 Csscri6wd r above. FutthOrmore, recent deci -0*ns of the V.S. Suprema 1� court have substantially clarified the limitations upon I � rayulations ®ad exoctions which local government agencies' o- nay : impose in coa4nuction with. development approvals. As a general rule; such rsquiresmants must , not only advance a <; U proper Uk�li'o gr�rpos�r, but must h�evps a a�easoz�ab� er � r� �salatict�sY ip or A*Xus, its tsfxas of both the content find 1' NOSSAMAN, CUTHNEK i'A4OX TLLt07i Memoxendum to TQ1t "Rahl, 'Esacutivr of €scar BuildiAg loduatty toaociation of southern calitornia, t Nalay view Region March 36, 190E Page 9 �r tho scope QE, tho,r6quiroment, to�tbe 3.mpoets of tha development actin ty_ta which the re ulati.on is to be applied. 3:- Cil ey nja C2AAk..2 Omm!zs3stn (1047) 683 U-S- ,_.. E107 9.0t. 31913.) Characterizing tho Power twff imposes .conditions an development ag an alternatives to prohibiting tuoh_ development baxod on a proper- vuL,I'c purpose, the Gol�ktiin that case declared that. " "ri)f the coroition4ub'stit'uted for tho prohibition uttor-�v lails' to fEurthar the and advanced as tint justification for the prohibition that es664ztial nexus, is r ;1 zliminact6O," JZjj,.r at 33980 e ' fit then priesent time - theret is limitee cargo available regarding the effeotiveRneas of sprinkler aYStemPs PartioUlarly in r�esidronti4l,construction. Thazet :r is, h2wover, substantial data on the rerlst:iver costs cf _ Puch inattllations; compared to additional ;Fires provontion and auppre $(L' n facilities. Stood on such data, it ;seams likesly,t'hat on* could damonstrota that mandatory � n�stalatiar cf sprinklsxf, f+articultrly in ee �residantial.. c*Atczt, ceszenat be, juit"itiOd to a reaaonablea respbnsa to 4 NOSSAMAN, GUTHNER, KNOn a ELUOTT Mamorindum to Tom KC hl,�txescuti,v! OfOcor baiidiiq�r�"tus zy �4sRroiaio �n of Sou urn caliloehia, > Daidy View Region I',> March 16, 1988 Page 16 c the impacts r'haxards generated b"he projects :t* be reon'Steed*�} donseaquentit; before imposing; r,ry au�h regulations, a local agencr;,achould be required to Pie!' r�gat extensive analises to Justify imposing those costs Ather• // e than utiliting existing alteernestive v+>bich a ti appear to be- ,zi t substantially as lffeactive in pra*icting 1 vas and Property an4 are fat stare 9�qs t— affise, :i.vs. In the absence of such a shvwi0g t;he pzopa"iad rd =rix�uasnt wound bee# as . .. the Court charaatarixe4 the sequireet6t av" tslw in the 1, Nollan case# "not valid regulation of 1a�, but an out 6 and outsplan of extortion." Additionally, to the= exteat thesg mandatory installation of giro sprinkler srstwW apprz-ufeblj► ,w\t increases n4vt hornet pricas, � it 'slay be to possible argue that, this viii imp air the ability of local lurisFdicM�Ions to produce the,, affordibley housi4'cailed for in the housing' e16meAts Of heir local general- plans# in ° violation of certain pk of leer yiiiuns ,State (Govotnment Coft Sections 83580 l ' M.MOrsnOum tv 'Tom ir^aFkJ4r L"�c+iCUf"irrd'. i? ,G•T' Building industry hl, iAtion ai(ty, View r(agiore page i MaLC'rh:16r 4 E � ron t +s�onrr, k5 8$sed upon the , fors sing, we ra�cotcirnr�nc� that you 7� tnkc a, iirm position i lour difcUsions with the biatxirt that they have no autharlty,; to sdopt• f th& type of re4ulation which then Ore proposing, tie are pvaiTa�ia to partioipa`2s io Y n . a such o w t_ l�rz.rirb �tai�E nx ! their attornaYs. i ,.5 TM AL P.12 r n a " Attachmeat.8 RZA =FIRfi RISK PRDUk2rIgN PRQGRXiV, DistrictEgos to the'fE�oothilll Fire Protection - April 6, loss, Name fixes sc�sent a da4ger'about. which all shquli e,ncerncd. The Building Industxy AtoQaiatipn. (BIA) has been !!lasting w th the mot- " { ? hill Fire District to giscuss ways s Of reducing the incidetiesa of 3 tes in the community, and herewith iS presented .0 ro p pWsttl za, tlis district which, if implemented, will reduce fires and fistgj tX.+ss 011'a Commuhity= wide basis. a �+ New homes,have,ca veryzlow incidence of fires. This is not an accidental, r�ircumstance. p'ver the last twenty years, building tarials" and technig�ei' b&� % ,progressed °tc the point .rrt eze� oriiy; x� eery s 1 number of all home 1ares.Occur in, homes under Lour years old_.. 'The DfA and its affiliated 6rgnnizatio' ns have beer active' iii dEvelctp n tnd encouraging the use of life- s -Nyi.nq Construction m4thodX ..for �eVtra_' ° decades.i The BIA °s concern fot ire safety does now end ua `t;h new h'r'""as., it is concerned with the community s a whole, y BIaZ !1as ac6ampZ;�,sh�. much „ to reduce f.4res in new homes; howsVPr, new homy fires are billy / i�small �) E portion of all home fires. Because our membership lid �9ndnkrork an t k7e cr / unsun the j organixatio�t wants to do what it can �..��..:�..�.� --. ,,",, � whale coun�.ty. .It Is recognized that about 85 percent- 0 1 home fires occur yin strt Wires' over twenty years old,, thus, it was docid id there is` s ^ill much which could be :dame. The BIA has developed a five Zioint` proe�.,aal, and intends to dark with the District, city officem 4nd community,, group& to implement tie program, I t , is as follow3s s C-1 1) Assist in obtaining, and distributahg edti:, ilvnal literature on the 'subject of 66 fire safety. 2). Zstab'lish a firersafety funds;to. aid these, on fixed, and low in as to irsl�all• sn.s extinguishers. �ke „detectors and fire 1 I 3) Develop a campaign existing'` sreoke datectors` in wort;,ing order. 4) Assist the c� ty and oR ; #it r in ancou rag 3n�!�tkie ., instaliatxon off; 1paztr ble- -fire extsngu$:shers In f kitchen areas,. where most home f1res star�LL =< , -j GO �� Home dire Ri*;C,,rtduor 0 `-; {? ' F) Propose to the City:thst there be. 'a semi -annual CostimunitY Smoke Detector and rim Satiety tray, with the BIA sort Jqq wit)-. :, loc4i media and ' =a through its memb4sshig' fizz't�ppetxc+ Are, 'c v j The proposal, if impjentan 4, would :save lives 4n4 propert�t, SXA is proud to gays that, aqs, r to stittistics„ people are not dying in new he ,ttes aus cf SIM-cona ,,rust , we- ar- moviii'l to i bring ,solutions to where 't4q real" fire dohg4r is t; olsi'ts names With aodge atintt' from *hnir'"°strt tht r.ty `anh Cntimcuttiy groups„ this .program s�` � be au i � ' �i � '�� ,�� a _ � � it •.