Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1989/01/11 - Agenda Packet
"/0701 -0 �__�_ , 1_x.1 -89 PC Agenda I of 4 .r t My PF RAW-10 G[r-ATl4CWA PIANNING C MI SSUN AGENEA i WEDNESDAY January x`_,1980 7.00 pan. LIONS PARR COMMUNITY CENTER 9151 BASE LINE Ri;,WCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFO1JNIA L Fledge of Allegiance IL a III can Col_ :n ssioner Blak -esley ! Commissioner Emeriek Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Tolstoy III. Announcements IV. AWrovat of Minutes December 28, 1988 Y. Consent Calendar =he following Consent Calendar ;terns are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will a4e acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed fordiscuasion. A. SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT GUIDELINES - CITY 07 RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Staff request to amend the maintenance section of the guidelines for the purpose of consistency. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASS&�SMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -32 - C RNEI' THEODOROU The development of en industrial b?,ilding totaling 28,364 quare feet on 1.65 acres of land in the General Industrial Di &itiet (Subarea 14) of —the Industrial,Area Specific Purr; �4?ated on the East side of 4ssop Dr�ve'.W north of 4th S °.feet , APN*. 229- 331- -02. �i C; DESIGM, ' REVIEW FOR TRACT 13444 - PULTE ROME CO':x'ORATICDN The Design kieviev' of buildings �tnd detailed site plan for 120 ;ots within a previously approved subdivision of 156 lots on 29.4 acres of land within the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling uniti per acre) of Ce Victoria Planned Community,, located at the southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon We'' - APN: 227 551 -1 thru 32, 227 - 561-1 thru 4 and 61 thru 76; and 227-571-1 thru 68. D. TIME EXTENS1611 FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12332 - CRISTIANO - A custom lot residential subdivision OT 51. lots on approxmately 85 acres of land in the Very Lour Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on thF.r east side of Haven Avenue north of the Hillside Drainage Channel APIA: 201. 121 -24, E. SAPPHIRE TRAIL VL Public Hear1w The follalving items are public hearings in which concerned indiv(duais may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recogniz6d by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions ''"ii be limited. to 5 minutes per individual for each project. t F, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PAIsCEL MAP 11934 - L, A> CHANCO,.: INCQRPLRATED A subdivision of 2:72 acres of land into 2 parcels in the Medium Density Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 150 faet south of , Lemon 4kvenue - APN: 201-252-03. (Continued from December 14, 1988.) G. ENVRONMEF','TAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14055 AVARASS - The development of 115 townhouse units on 10.27 aerlili off' land in the tledium Density Residential District (8-14 dwelling units por acre), located north of Arrow Highway and. east of Baker Avenue APN: 207 - 201 -32 and 12. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13830 e W1NBItO£3I DEVELOPMENT A residential subdivisios,�i 23 single family lets on 15.72 acres pf land in the Very Low Residential District (less th%n 2 dwelling units per eere), loosted on the east side of Heilman Avenue at Wjlbot� Avenue - APN: 1462-071-1 and 13. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.' AND TENTATIVE PARCEL yIAP 12057 -WESTER A is - A sub4Wrdon o 1.81 acres at iatdl into 1 parcel or condominium• purposes, in, thA Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea s), locat6d at the nortbwesfi corner of Peron Boulevard and Helms Avenue - APN- 200- 031 -57* _ F ar Xi. Pablia poir,ments his ti the )time and place for the gg moral Wublit; to address the Ccmmrssioh. items to be discussed r ire d.,» those which do not already appear an this agenda. ; { Adj%ut` weni The Planning Commission has adoptsd Adminiv6'►txtive Regulations that set an ','y p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consett of the Commivs:on 1 i 1 f; 1! c J. PERMIT 88-48 EGGHEAD U; tIVERSYTY - The request ,to establish a computer classroom and office in a leased space of 1,000 square feet witrin an existing multi - tenant industrial park on 4.01 acres of- land in the haven Avenue Overlay *District, located at P170 -9190 haven Avetnuz APN 209- 262 -17. K. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIWIAL USE _PERMIT 87 -05 - _,' CRO&N AND CROWN I JLi. Ti 'iiAN VHURCH - rrequest to amend the site plan and 04 iding elevations on a proposed 6,200 square foot sant:uary, �$% 5 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (lea-' �fian "G units per acre) of the Et Wanda Spea-We Pla- iacated �.t 6723 Etiwanda - Avenue - r APN: 227- 061 -03,. I,. MODIFICATION JO GONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -';b OAS INVESTORS - P. request to delete building "J w.;, st a previously approrpd shopping center rhomas Wln,�ry2, to: tcd at the northeast corner of P`ooth,11 Boubevard and Vindyard Avenue - APN: 208 - 101 -10 and 11. M. VAWANCE 88 -26 - KEN RUBY CONSTRUCTIC"N COMPANY - A request, to allerw or, -site lighting staM4r o exC� e3 the ' 15 foot beigh". requirement for a proposed shopping center in tie Community Commercial District, located at the southwest earner of Foothill BoWevard and Ramona Avenue - APN: 208-301-15, 16, and 17. VIL Old Business N. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 88 -37 - UTMAN- t4_1;,DONALD & - PAM HERS = ThA development of a two -story 26,265 square oot of -h a building on 7.09 acres of land in the Haven Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6), located at the mrtheast corner ! of Haven Lvenue and Acacia Street - AFN: 209- 401 -01. (Cuntinued from December 14, 1988.) 1 V11L Mew lE wAness 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88- ?9 CASTILLO COMPANX INC. -ene developmetdr o f an office building totaling 15,107 square feet j on 2,34 acres of lanai hi the Industrial Park District (Subarea �. 12), located at the southeast corner of Milliken and 5th t'treet 1 - APN: 229 - 341 -10. M Directors Reports } P. ETIWANDA NORTH ANNEKATI01. - Staff requests direetion on revision of the work grogram. I X. Commission &Wness t eurANQxoA- cuxsrr eQNrr Qramxac pA�! co DNtINiO .NT✓*RNIT10iVA�, +iAMQAr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONOA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1985 1k TO: Chairman and Nwbers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT GUIDELINES - CITY OF RANCHO r9CARURGX-- Staff request to amend the maintenance sec on of etfi guidelines for the purpose of consistency. I. ABSTRACT: Staff is requesting an amendment to the Senior Housing er ay istrict Guidelines to bring them into consistency with the language in the existing Senior Housing Development agreement. II. BACKGROUND: On October 26, 1968 the Planning Commission reviewed the language of the Senior Housing Development Agreements and recommended approval of an amendment changing the language of the first two agreements to conform to the language of the most recent agreement. The language in the most recent agreement with Nourse Development Company was changed from the previous agreements for the purpose of clarity only. Property maintenance remains a high priority for Senior Housing projects. The language recoamended for the Development Agreements is: Maintenance Guaranty. Developer shalt comply with all City maintenance standards enacted from time to time. The Senior Housing Overlay District Administrative Guidelines adopted by the City Council on April 6, 1983, contain the previous language (see atimched). III. ANALYSIS: Vor consistency, the language in the Project once Requirements section of the adopted Senior Housing Overlay District Administrative Guidelines should be changed as follows: in order to insure that project maintenance is in accordance with the maintenance plan approved by the City a m6atenawee depes #t op othep Segal• sesup4ty depestT acseptab;e to the G#tyv shall be pequ#pedr U -4ou of a depesttT a handssape 6latntenanee 94040 W' be set up to aeeepdamse w#th state law and G#ty pe ;#syt the Development shall comply with all City maintenance standards enacted from time to tie ITEM A PLANNING GOWISSION STAFF REPORT RE: SENIOR HOUSING OnRLAY DISTRICT GUIDELINES January 11, 19669 Page 2 IV. RECONPMATION: Staff reconvends approval of the attached Re—s7dFution of ppr oval . ARe, y 3 ttect Ix er < 88:MB:ko Attachments:. Exhibit. °AK - Senior Housing Overlay District Admi�iistrativ,e Guidelines Protect Maintenarice Requirements. Resolutiovi of Approval i i Senior Housiag Ove>.ioy District Administrative Guid7 Page 9 e IJ i. parking area design and layout (integration and masking of trash collection area, proximity to dwelling units, use of landscaping) J. General Provisions The general provisions of the oase district shall apply, unless specifically changed by this chapter or as modified by a development plan or conditions of approval. K. Performance Standards In addition to the performance criteria of the SHOD, the performance standards of the base district shall apply, unless specifically changed by this chapter nr as modified by a development plan or cor►ditions of approval. L. Design Guidelines The design guidelines of the base district shall be applicable to all projects whenever possible, unless specifically changed by this chapter or as modified by a development plan or conditions of approval. Ic- II. PROJECT MAINTENANCE REgUIREMENTS Project developers should be prepared to demonstrate to the City how they intend to maintain the project over the long term (Landscaping, buildings, parking areas, walkways, etc.). Approval by the City of a.169 term maintenance plan will be a standard condittdn of approval in all projects developed under the Senior Housing Overlay District. n order to insure that project maintenance is is accordance with the maintenance plan approved by the City a maintenance deposit or other le-'41 security deposit, acceptable to the City, shall be re4uired. In lieu of a deposit, a Landscape Maintenance District may be set up in accordance with State law and City policy, Project Mainatenaneail3lags should, at a minimum, provide details regarding work to be p0formed and approximate maintenance schedules for the following routine maintenance items: o Painting or staining of buildings (dwellings, recreation, other) j a Landscaping (trimming, replacement) II o Resurfacing /restriping of driveways and parking areas a Roof a Walkways o Common areas; covered patios, outdoor furniture a Lighting o Pools, spas, saunas Alk o Recreation Buildings A- Wo RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOiX',AE CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMEWMENT TO THE MAPT_'`%iZ4� O SECTION OF THE SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT G06ELINES AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) The Senior Housing Overlay District Guidelines were revier.Fed by thf: Planning Commission on March 23, 1983 ac3 approval recoar*nded. (ii) The Senior Housing O:°erlay District Guidelines were reviewed and adopted by the City Council, Resolution 83 -43 on April 6, 1983. (iii) The City reiues amendment to the maintenance section of the Senior Housing Overlay Distri w Guidelines for the purpose of clarity and consistency. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Planning Co nission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: (i) This CoROssion hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Wart A, of this Resolution are true and correct. (ii) This Commission hereby recomm nds approval of the following change in the Senior Housing Overlay District Guidelines: In order to insure t4at project ma ntanance is in accordance with the maintenance plan approved by the City a Pa#gtenanee depest ar other Toga; seohir4y depss0T aeeeptab4e to the 0ty, shall be reg0Fed: 4w -14eat of a depes#tx a 6andssape Matntenanae 94st4st may 4e set ep 4* ascordanee w4th State Taw and 64ty< peiayv the Developer ahs11 comply with all Cfty anintenance standards emoted free time to time. APPROVED AM ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WCHO CUCWORGA BY: 'j arry e o - rman I. ATTEST- x Bra u er, re ary I' A-4 ` .i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION KC. - RE: SENIOR' HOUSING OVERLAY D1SPrjCT January 11, 1989 Page 2 i 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and a regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cownission of the =�. City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held 1, on the 11th day of January, 1989, by the foil owinq vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: cOMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: MMISSIONERSt. ITEM B - CITY OF RANCHO CU'CAMONGA STAN- R EPORT DATE: January 11, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-32 - e eve opmen . of an Industrial -5Vf1-dingz-ital7ng 28,3E7 square feet on 1.55 acres of land n the General Industrial District (SOarea 14) of the industrial Area Specific Plan, located ar, the east side of Hyssop Drive and north of 4th Street - APR: 229 - 331 -.02,. I. PROJECT eta] SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action. Requested:: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - can Gener- -aF Industrial (Subarea 14) South - Vacant; City of Ontario East - Vacant; jrReneral IndustrI al ISubarea 14) West - I -15 Freeway and Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 12) C. General Plan Designations- Project fife — General Industria' North - General Imustrial South - City of Ontario East - General Industrial West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The currently vacant site slopes approx wa e y - tam north to south. A Southern California Edison easewnt for power lines borders the site on the east, while Interstate 15 borders the site on the west. An existing flood control basin exists on the site, south of the proposed industrial building and parking lot. , ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORC OR 88 -32 - Carney- Theodorou `January 11, 1989 P,ge 2 E. P%�6 % -ung Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spacee Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Office 21000 1/250 8 8 Warehouse 20,000 1/1000 20 33 6,367 1/2000 3 TOTAL 3T 4 II. ANALYSIS• A. General: At this time, the applicant proposes construction of e nor kern portion of the site only. Development of the southern portion of the site ran occur only after Day Creek Charnel is improved, which will eliminate the need for the retention basin located on the southern portions of the subject property. The applicant proposes to construct additional parking and landscaping on thii southern portion. That proposed action would require approval of a Minor Development Review at a later date. In accordance with City policy, the applicant is required to pay in -lieu fees for landscaping within the 1 -15 Freeway right- of-way. This condition applies to she entire length of the western propt,uy boundary. The applicant requests Environmental Assessment for development of the industrial building and other site improvements, upon issuance of a Negative Declaration, the City Planner will grant tinai approval or the project based on conditions recomn:eemed by the Design and Teclin Cal Review Committees. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel, rolstoy, . Coleman) initi -ally reviewed the project on September 2, 1988. On December 22, 1988, the Committee (Emerick, Mc-Niel, Kroutil) recommended approval of the project subject to the following cordi Lions: 1. The north and south elevations should be upgraded with additional sandblasted concrete detail work. 2. Canopy trees should be used adjacent to the patio /dining P-ea. Permanent patio furniture should be provided in the patio /dining area. 2 U pLAN!dlNw COWISSION STAFF REPOT OR 88 -32 Carney- Theodorou. January 11, 1989 Page 3 3. The temporary gated emergency access should conform to all City design standards. C. Technic I Review Coitteet The 7echniral Review Committee eterm nw on ec€ er IM, that with the recommended conditic, ;s of approval the project is consistent with applicable Gity Standards end Ordinances.. D. Environmental Assessment: The proposed development ides within T,Te—Doycreex Channel overflow floodway path. A preliminary drainage report was submitted and identified the need to elevate the floor level of the proposed building approximately 3 feet in height, Upsn review of Part I of the Initial Study and completion of Part 11 of the Environmen+.al Checklist, staff has found that although the project could have a significant effect on the environsvnt, (dvj�- to the flood hazard) there Will not be a significant affect in this case because mitigation measures have been added to the project. III.: FACTS FOR FINDINGS. This project is consistent with ;tv Industrial rea pec M Flan and General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impact$. In addition, tho proposed site plan and with ithe design Areaw Specific land Andn all conditions, Will City Star.dards. IV. RECUOMENDATIOH. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative ec are ion or Development Review 88-32. Respectfully sutmitted, Brad Buller City Planner B8: BH.vf, Attachments: Exhibit "A* Location Map Exhibit "8" Site Plan Exhibit #C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations . C.: <'�i /: :2 \� � � � \� «: J< ƒ` <«y» w�ytZ�� `•��.�� <w222�yy� ��� // � \� NORTH Cry Ok, ITEM DR 68-32 , 4AYCHC,�;CUCAMONGA, TITL U.: — SIMS PLAN PIANNING DIVISION Fammun _ ar.Axrga none CITY OF ,,,,RANCHO CUCAM014GA NORTH ITV-- : ! -3 .. a_ nTLE.. LAMSCAPE PLAN .'t�.' i1' Rtu �` '� S.. d .L ^ .. � 'Y . — � T t .` 1- �- ii .. .. �.� w, .` :6i..�,- iY_� — CIiY OF RANC110 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1989 TO: Chairman and Menbers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECi: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 1.3444 - PULTE HOME CORPiDRATIOM Tfie design review o ui r�gdi elevaz�ons —' a�n, 7 -e af�s'te plan for 120 lots within at previously ,approved• - subdivision of 156 lots on 29.4 acres of land within the Low Density Residential 1istrict (2 -4 dwA ling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the southwest corner of Victoria Park. Lane and Ken;ron Way - APN: 227 - 551 -1 thru '�2, 227 - 561 -1 thru 4 and 61 thru 76, and 227- 571.1 thru-58. I. PROJE:T AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action _Requested: Approval of the plot plan and building elevations. B. Project Density: 3.94 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Us;-, and Zoning: Kor - acant; 'r� Ui psity Kcsidentiai (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) South - Southern Pacific Railroad and vacant; Low -tedium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) East - Single family homes and vacant school site; Low- Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per ac rye ) West - Single family homes; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling un "i.s per acre) D. General Plan Designations: roF jecti' -- Law- Mediu�a Density Residential North Low - Medium Density Residential South - Low - Medium Density Residential East Low - Medium Density Residential West - Low-Medium Density Residential E. Site Characteristics: TtlQ site is ,presently %*Acan with no significant a vege on acfl slopes approximate., _ • 3Y. 'from north to south. ITEM PLANNUZ COMK�STWA STAFF REPORT DR for 'T13444 - Pulte Home Corporation January 11, 1989 Page 2 l II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: Pult- Nome Corporation proposes to develop 120 of 1:Fi e- 17b�Tal lot• aproved &i part, of Tentative Tract 13444 on April 8 1987.. The remaining 56 lots received Planning Commission approval on January 27, 1988 tad are currently under construction by Rboades Development. B. General,, Pulte Home Corporation proposes 3 product types, each with five elevation iesigi schemes. All the homes are two - story and range in size from 2,754 square feet fJr P'an J to 2,985 square faet for Plan 3. Plan 2 has 2,751 square *det of living area. 'i. o and three car garages are proposed with sawn homes having side -on ai►d two - space only garages to 'improve the streetscape, The hotaes have been designed sriaiiar to the Georgian or Walk -style house, incorporating such features as yuoi:r multi -paned windows, Tascan columns, pedimented windy., and decorative cornices. The project meets the recreational vehicle storage requirement through provision of ten foot wide sideyards and three -car garages on certain lots throughout the development. C. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (B akestey, i e ea, Kroulil) reviewed the proposal on December 7, 1989 and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: i 1. Stucco return fencing should be used between the homes rather than the slump stone as proposed. Retaining walls within the front yard area should also be consistent with the .stucco .return walls. 2. French dr,*,rz should be provided rather than sliding gloms doors. 3. A 2 x 6 oiler a 2 x 8 trim vas suggested for use at key window locations. 4. The architecture should be revised and brought before the Committei again. In particular, the Plan 2 (front elevation) and Plan 3 (right and rear elevations) should be enhanced. LATE NOTE: The Committee reviewed revised elevations and plans AOL a e r January 5, 1988 meeting. Conditions suggested at that qW meeting liave been added to the attached Resolution of Approval.` PLANNING C. ISSIOM STAFF REPORT OR for 1`11 14 - Pulta HoMe'CorpQration January U, 1989 Page 3 0. Environmental AssfpssMent: A Negative Declarau on for Tract was issued b-n-AP-riT 8, 1987. A preliminary noise study was robmitted at that time for the entire tract. The report identified that noise asitigpjtion measures were needed, but only for the, hom-s adjacent to `Milliken Avenue, which are part of Rhoades Devolopament's port4,i of Tract 13444. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS:, The project is consistLnt with the Victoria Planned , ommun y and the General Plain'. The project will rv,, ".be ' detrimental to adjacent . properties or cause' signifi,C3nt environmental impacts. In adcjtion, the proposed use is +yin compliance with the applicable provisions of the Yi:tor a Gomm;uni*y Plan, the Development Code and'City Standards. W. RECOMENDATION: Stsii lr recommends -?ghat the Planning Commission approve tFe—Fesjgn Revif -* for this portion: of 1344$, subject to the conditions of approval,, through adoption of the attached ' Resolution. ®RUlly mt r n BB :BN:vc Attachments Exhibit "A" Location Map Exhibit "B" Site plan Exhibit "C ",- Landscape plan Exhibit "D" - Bu ;lding Elevations Resolution of Approver 'with, Conditions Affk i „CITY OF RANCHO U ONG) I "Iftlf A lVtlklTlr%Lll t s%VllI" rolro%lkv- ord ITEM, 13444 x& MAC i D 4 CITY OF RANCHO- CUCAMO GA ^ 5 a ITFji QR TR 13444 TITLE ., ilTE PLAN z i 0 E 11 w J�7f7M lM�M' 6�ATi0Y DR T€d 13444 ` E: PLAN 1 ELEVATIONS "Wvrvl vm. A OW WMATM g0ow ou'ram a, mma"ArAw See corAtIont of aWo"T2 El CI V10% u TY ITEM: M TR 13"4 RANTf,.'tLAI" 0 CUCAMONGA I TITLE: PLAN 2 ELEVATIONS P% 0% E, -- .W9 S*e cowtbions of ap"M I CiTy Of RANCHO CU�,IAMONGA ,r- A *jvTwr- vswrxrro.i -,%v.T f",-q ITEM-e TR 13444 TITLE: PLAN 3 ELF-VATKMS- RESOLUTION 110. A RESOLUTION OF THE RA!(CHO °'UCAMONGA PLANNING COMISSiON APPROVING DESIGN REVT'R FOR TRACT NO. 134?4 LOCATED WITHIN THE VICTORIA pl';,.MED COHMUNITY ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AND KENYON WAY IN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT APN: 227 -55x -1 thru 32,. 227 - 561-1 thru 4 and fit thru 76, and 227 - 571: -1 thru 68. A. Recitals. (i) Pulte Home Corporation has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 13444 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subjc -ct Design Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On January 11, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Ci *,of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, ;if this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial' evidence presented to this Commission during the above- refer;,%ced meeting on January 11, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spscifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the Gener.l Plan; and (b) That the proposed design ;s in accord with the objective of the Development Zip paad the purposes of the district ir, which the site i .a Incated; and (c) That tM proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development:. Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements �a the vicinity, ALANAIW;r COMMISSION RESOLUTION NQ. OR FOR T 13444 - Pulte Nome Corp. January 11, 19$9 Page 2 3. Based upon thy. findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Commissio,, hereby approves the application subject to each ` and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditiu!.Lt [ attached hereto and incorporated Lerein'by this reference. (1} Stucco return fencing shall be used between the lYores rather than the stump stone as proposed. Retaining walls within the front yard area shale also be consistent with the stucco return wall'-. (2) French doors shall be provided rather than sliding glass doors. (3) A 2 x 6 over a 2 x 8 trine shall be used at k.:y window locations. (4) The chimney cap detail shall be revised by reducing the i i number. of 2 x 6 trim elements. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Pianner with the final I building plans. i (5) The balconies proposed in the rear yards shall be ,�slgned with a more decorative railing m4teriai (wrntoo_ ;ron, smooth finished wood, etc.). The final de-1 :n shaft be reviewed and approved by the City Planner wish the final building plans, (6) Side yard fencing along interior streets shall be stucco tu` match the stucco return fencing and retainiag, walls in the frout yards. (7) The "i;unburstl cap elewants above the garage windows on the front elevation of Plan 2A shall be eliminated. (8) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the gn�tenAY0 fourth Stteet Rock Crusher project in a standard' format as determine4 by the City Planner, I prior to accepting a deposit on any property. (9) All pertinent conditions of Resolution 67 -51 approving T- otative Tract 13444 shall apply. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall ceetify to the adoption of this Resolution. V3 PLANNANG COM+I5RIG RESOLUTION NO. DR FOR T 13444 Pulte i Corp. January 11, 1959 . Page S APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JX4UARY, 1959. PLANNING COKMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA arty fe , hairimn ATTEST, --Wr—aTsuller, secretary t' I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Ir` Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resnlatinn was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by th;e Planning C'or- missidrr of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Play ',ning Comm'Osion held on the 11th lay of Janmary, 1959, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: CONISSIONERS: t6SENT: C5MMISSIONER$: 1 fi ,, t �r c.� �yL�OxawsLl�. u Na -L� 2 .�+,, aigPa, C x. YOI YY }i h' N!V.wN O4 VL '6 ~YL q p�q Y p�0 SCi`. -osJ �+ d w &N..:L Y� Np r dyyl. i w Xi A Y 6 0 Y S J ��Yc LYgW,aN Ips�O. L.A DA yV r.x� YCY". of �C. > Y4 YqM i� G C YOy 'y0 1'!. N i Y +r. �jY C NEyfi 41 > �Y�YOaYIYiILC�~p �spC{�Y�YU +o� �w� °E Y$ ti�� =M 1 g Y fwG. CpY wl Spry w �q Y.0 tY�. gJ VY .6�u,j'.r.� C'�GYM Y� a �ppL (ACC wO 2L�p�a ' �eCi,Ia= R w °. 4 N ;yM q,q�N�ro gq.ON Y6y> GGGGGG 'iM y j IL.6 uM�l•i��,a yG� �O u Y. SN $ ylNal N C 4-CN�. a3N YYYr �Cw yC +.O �y5 �y� O'C{l^�.�� �SiiN X83 +'�S Y1 z..o..-Y�Iwils vN4 q N �� 1 f. ZYww f. Ya SiY +i �Aupypn� O.�T . N�� R � d$ 0.' 8 �M.. �.y ■CCy +���. �N1CwE ■y�y1 u1HC� OynY� �pUq �ry,egu 'J.. NyY YM UMu 4i CCNYCl�Cw WY4q „ID a�Y.. P N. ]Yqi IM�YY� 4el. YWCa.Ca9_wy�y� M C N �, MRh NwY1l Vj >y .-4 INS ZypMi {_-�{N1U Yi a9 V - -5,S� �p O Y H , 9 r'tly is a40 O1 riilL nri i-a�S blab. d; ICJ :6 N.. d.” r N f4 r Y) •J 1p�pl \Aflf, \ \Nnf / M r Y !I Original Poat w 0 w w: q ro W R! +a V a L L �h a A H v a 'O e ro 4 e ci ro V �y } a � .id W N Y Blum µy yyy A aP � r9 Z gMM �...yN.VS 2. 9 top M 3 YOY�. JS vYO+ gtl ^$Ida ° �► > y � e L A. A.. mow. 6 �.. Y6 •Rw g p V N u �u {as 1%1 iP� it 9 �•�.�Nq N3 N� K� w f Y! G � My� eaJa11e i�✓ n y�I Yi� p Cy � u6�2i _wC a.�'Oa1pDYUW yi. -0�Y.A183 Qt♦ • O LOU1Y. C ~O^y V t 'i YV 11Y..0 YC�1Y YV�a.�y » 1 Yi � �. K }CVO P•O Y s ii 4w °may Yyyy i ,C iAAk y QpT QM V q M 9Y ;� �y.� a•~* A Y�JJ iiiiy5555 CyI N Y � i N L' > 'i N N y H V � d L N w y V•�. �Ywqq O any G V� yt'y�y ^� L. 4. y »g �.Ntiw "! V �p� •19 N+ L4V q Yw LO sI" - F wtAQ Q�.Ze Ybe'ii c Y+ui Ry {t N _ AY y A VNyw MCM yi M•t, Y ^M° MO 1�� ya �'c CYi +CO "UU'� jiy.0 W ° yio-°N,rgr $t4 �..i °..¢." ii Y'°�3 �' ¢ s Bpi. ay. :`i•. $�Ck .C.V y�9 Y,Gw 'h I1 J1 �N x,p^ �My�.L� J4JCC K�.� tt0. wi"�N.0 F ^`_yVy YrN ti� ^N u•i� N. aN ■r 0.L Q yC °3 3Yw, - 'O ear f�Yi j-KI ICQ S;; p� R� °ti'a.$�aas�y,1 a3YN NiSM M'y� xdU L. 3woyO :M wua�F ijj Mq$ -3.05, L "P_ F ;,,�...yy,� q,. �S `.s ��J.w`o °��_i r"$yvY1 Ya`$p >G' Zia j! C.° C e4 `I^ Gr( MU At at'O CL ��NNG O «11 Y. »0.pp mil Lp LC r, 4Y W E J i a M aN 4 w �rn. A V+" r f IV y61 p��.N.rp•' Pp »'O C Nir CW' �!•'O'L�0.��y~ Ys N�� ^N .f4 V VWwiy.Or y» N y 1 Y O C lCW Cl1My� �A.4Lq y iVi A:f;,T.�N Vp VY. H Vol8 L yT 0.ta1� G C]�YRI NOO jy. upb�y '°yJ � A'yC Bit Fby SLIw�YM LmY) ��.Q���$i� Qiff ,eai •"� � -Vy �� �C � reaAYaiA� .y4ig p ra -9 3� y yi Yvr ,3� 9 t7 N» 61 tl�M NIII.�Yw W•.l� EE V�l"�pa MAL OW q A� �++ .K?f 'a �y #'�fYyN yk' " 4 A' r�'Y wq Y O V a CYt G YaV• °+ >y f M w. y� ° M 1 W y y � v 4 J± Vw4 N R °•I YN 6L L� W t'� Y � A � ".y it IE -re �V ..� Big:- _VN1Y��61 N N`I�JL N AR�w�3ys C$gm —, ti 'L. %w o E� AJi hy��yi. r�} v�w� Q$ t ! @@V !Nl � Q ,�.y Y y� CNN � y1.0. Own, »Cyy`.y dw C1t Y.1�{ ;211 {� gi�•iVV�Sq/Yy oyYr�V °.. yO{ p°tl "y�(.. 81.4 V Wit: M s� 6G4M «4LT4 rii a, it all �i .. �`. ;ip$sa 1 � = AilC s J Q{� Nt4A r_C �.� tiNo NY N� ~ yyyN,,, Cw Sai4 °,,LL° b RYw11111t/ yry� �> ,CC G'S xO y4y. VMA•. y Yx5Mw szo QgwIY ;W lI. 11 § tltl N V M« �^ 6 y O6 a QfA R yO Yy.+X. °^ psi .'�� N � N��y yyYxgi y° r�x c tyLf {��Yj =r 0.yr „ �y N = >iy 6 V IV �yV Wit•« j ® pti� �e vu q'LY �SV'"Y iyp. �.aii ^qM� LV'j •QN O(}!�p.Ii �yi Nw. SLY' +� qY:y �5 w.A�vO•yl aAxw w4.pi as l f + wf E I mu 4i A 1� 0 4J �e V V Y L p L C 1 .00NO CO C OC �V Od OOY�C. Iff U{�.wy TL L 01 L0 v 0' ` N. YYy 1��JW � ^ 010 1� � G40 � Y � ° 6 V ^ L. � O � • C.'O {A�M� NNO tyV, 1p. 01so C yV ] 1qy y C l O O Y A. O,,CyCC� N c bVC VV Ly1L LONY. yM1 {���T�2O = �C L �YP � '~'7 uN �Y � N N °C fyJ ++ C Y 10'•� U Y 0l i/y. O °M9 V� V V ONN V UO CJVLO yy .cO CNC T`N °.L HE 131 L L -.1, 1• A < �.�� O NCl U r OO•J� A C yt�dy °A �N'^ ON•GL di 9 l a+ L •� L 6^ i L ,�.. Sf V Y YY. q L. W 010 N Y y y C O N uN.1 C G 5 I alt �M C� Oby6 °1��` BYpy9'w Ns'. M.LM Ci! aU1l °C 01,�G. $ NO aN1L V�1�NSNa 01VC�O.p.CM �; so O ~7 w.�CC -L iY �a gtiSNL"L UL Y4 IOCU V 2L fY�pC1•YL• zu' "• 4, q� '�i 6N v. WKrUe V.YVN i_" 1r�.`C4 E CpV �N„�l Tyt c. YM� MQN N ML "A 6pL CO�.4 WCwR 6ANM'.8 %'L-.~ �1 wL' ,y° N y b�G1 �4° c {N. dd4ff ,•66SS., �_q?q¢¢' Y (Yp ` a.. 1�1� ZE t1•LSO W N Y CLN �1Y� CLN y CIA. V101 Cg.M�i. QQl 9NaLG «�LOUf + N L L U SZg VUY Ur fl° 4 �1M.' •�' a YN �1 L Nt'1 iy: NC y �p MP�yV >v �yq �u c«19. #Y �� SA^ L0y41� °2({a1y 5 + a i.a o« at `t1``L �NL ■!�N1F$ L °N pC�61�. y�(1O0y NS 9.^ V I N A N < M < N j lL a• M N !C <N y .� ° U S N C� N ILO i C t M° C- iginal R-3ar Quality �Ly1 V e 0! ' Y 01 tT u `.a S C C a ze C L >CG e. € p MN S ` y N Lry' w C�_ ° .j N S O N G 1�y ^�L�1 N` �q G6 �. Y- {� U U pR C js(}` ��6® 1p� �cy� N� 6Mj _it �.0 6M U �¢a1 �� Y °6 Y0 5 tg-x r. 8 i &: '.j2 q E EN Lir`� �:yu N G +`Y �ff.1� �■ �ny. 3 ±At. N +V ��Q yyOI. p' �CC X��t1�L�f 8N3w a45 ±��'.tu°.y 2- uNp g +� C6NC1VS L} p� w'�i •g� �■ 1� +. � L �O•-u3 w Cjp +E. Ny C =° C°LZ O� �Vp pj fV �ObN �{1y {LMA�Y MYL1 S v »Y Sq CCU W 1� lw� �� 2� Q. �1 ?Y fp, �7 {�. pV ■ C °u CLM& S t— CMA N e.�i OVrw. �! °. VLU�, QSi iJ CZ 55!� S i 8 iu « L °e� u .1�q pY1Yya it S f5 $ �rpi Oe1.'.X L{Ly1. Vv °N V C ^y MO tV �L�LV NC Cp.MYp wto �MTT� �Lt;11�0 � .Y�LO•�cu ��L �L �w C� «b �� •{np1a� '3- M VSw� +��C'� 1' ; q6_O V91 V�pO ��y�- n'•�19 OI �E Cu U yy 88 E S Y M S A �1. °L L° °a.� YG.6 ^ Y' Y Lam, .Y °�• KAY. L� + �67N pdw ac V. °' cy <'p <'S� 1'S �'UL �a N° c 0 1 S Sd W rJY�`� q.`7a d=og �c cw4L = �'° o4asto � Y rc. u » v *w $ Y�LwCY a e" wC Y NK O w^ iH. ez, «p 'w � .�.�µs o L o pL ^ yM P4> CY°• C z p V N y _'TY tlUtL . i ro V AG G6ywp p(y iQ tl��)i i }L p1 �p � C .. ly $� 2pCf1 YP Y.0 ra o 5 $ w a � YCAL ypi M 'q«yuu{ � > .O . y0C 3e (ttp tt� VO p N Y Myy� L N vLi i a � y 2 au �.. a_ ' ro Iy��Yd Oy 01 A O 4s 7 �yy F di • M6 C ■Z X � L g C Lw 4' Y Y WN L ilRcQ k Ty y4L� OY'S"' a Auu�� I.0 41 Y. Y. §4-' .c ww• MMY7"' . E4« »fig, GC $ mro � A Y�O 2. Lti.O f w. qpp��w m.��Vv w. L.O V �`CG q .���C.lt1t 4 p M LYE. L AIJ i�{r•. -�p1i j.Y•Y- OWE �'� aA �. p m C.m .. U'1 p EI Cwt i33 ]r 79.Y TV: "s vg .—w- �z" �9"L•Vr. Tpr^ in lad, �O wq _j �NYC��j � �Yr� 4 >A�y �. C Y�1 ill .•.w aVCxU YG� �D.0 L •M CwC eGe. NLY Yu.�� 4C.� fM 6pMf �'• V +�C'•p G rN YPCyAYpYp�� w LCCCC4 f�� N�+7� LCCr Omu �LC A M`> .V. Y 4 �'N' V�V 11V NP�L'r ��a,YS � p�± Y y�Ol '99r ,,C4O6>4V I�Mrow ypAG�t'L FK ws =vt i ,CYG pY�Y 6 G1 C'. AY {Y�s �r3 iia�i li vi yb�L1. A y>Y ro b DIV N �C ^ °wu � N �roas y V O 6 ���1 CCCU Lo L•� p>p Oa nw6 ^w� a .i+ �.111sJJJ. yy zip] •^+s a a i5�uu �Cp'LLY N L V Y N AI ti� til Z w 4 � ! Y a &s • Eta � Y � e• u » v *w $ +�y�. a e" O w^ iH. L N u {� » V rN+ N YN 4 NN °n, , =.e. CLLaf±��F $ L C N� YL4 >•Q4n F AYwp y4 i �O�Y N1C D �{LeI� . N Y Myy� L N vLi i a � is-12 m J L� p. 4• 4 NI �� Jam• w 4 � ! Y a &s Eta �s u » wre�• Yyb q ap a e" N u {� O « 0 0 N YN 4 NN °n, , =.e. CLLaf±��F $ wa� Y y IM AYwp NW{y �O�Y N1C D �{LeI� . CO { a.-*. 6 n m au �.. NI �� Jam• w 4 � ! Y a &s Eta �s u » wre�• Yyb q V O 4 a e" u {� O NN °n, , =.e. O y « Ya Y y IM �4 NW{y LR N1C D �{LeI� . CO { N f�■(. g Y Yt fln y■ y$� W. yt Igo— S Y ■t N V to 6 4 O "A �J jf N f7 tit �S N 'r5c « «i£ «°'ai c --1 �L `(� ♦�`[]' `�_''YJ E i�yC�pYp. ltllyA %� V 9 4 MQ OWa yL `y �liT NV YMY"�.O NC'O O � tSlf � rQ:O G LM L V o o s2wy8 ^pIL S-, L .59 IvT .s Y u A.' 01G W �a o�pg.N.CC w. u a� .p. N v. mao WQ zzzz^ ^O. CN CY 8> tl ^atl .5- �q - 6� Y10Na b.NGI �Y � d1�Nd 9y. 6 >CC > a 0 _ttC ■ N r L� N Yy y f({I''ol L N� Y^ Y.^ Y 4 1� itJ N d C V =CeO O6 E °� O c tl ^ � V C L' ppppu! qq 1F N _ VO a"1 q G+ a .- • Y° C C C S2 a > O C M, CNyy 0� V 9C N x'� O O g O Qi� &� C ^Y . 11ii C° �M C �♦ Yy. " ^ C+ V Y ^ fj Y°^ C'Y V C C^90 Her ■rpMLr YY a NCr y yyy��� ,��y� pyq ��y� K0 V3i C- DE M 1.01V �M. �N SL� 61011 4 N 1�1 d' Yf1 1p 1� OLe cg1tYi qN C ^�■s G CC O ^VP'�yy0pi1 O cc . � C y�gOyyY p ° p� yya11 Y pL L fYi.M, 1 y � k1 Io L�1 �v q2 �pK6i �C1 6 Y•� �` R N MyM� rMq�•��A �,1°.. Y Odt� Mi«�Lr� AY i,. Cfl 00. ��C 3x. YYY M�M� 8�i � �p $��•. pNo �•Y.s� Y1LjY0R Lin■ '+ ^0. V N� C O A� Ttlg it� p Y> Yip L 00 IL�g1 1N y�� Y 6� " =�Yy 11Y. Yiy� y O�w C V FYa 3 y y � YGy �1 It �^� 1 `i =VAM1VY ^O0~0® 0Yj= 0 �Y�6 NGL. �LOa NL pNl � yptppp110�1 �.V Ygpy P'E C N y ys0 a+wp �1 �N y~ :v: t. L6�11. pn YV 6CD� Ju N± to 0"=1o0 u°12� YYak1 WN ay Vii 6 i970s K,fJ i10�C ®iii i'.PY FOY - 4 u N. 19 f I I i� 1 I1 r,- i-"1 El Ell- it v O. �i ff+ ,C O LG O $+Y NA OrN CI. IL } M LET O yy~ r .V.M VroL� yy+ Q+ V `2 io M Y yO �Aj S1 \ Y- E i y 2NC L Y U+ VY C �9. t L V' C N N �awN x° a'OU G. YC L, L e yt O N a` J.S c'O.L cL LA�L ri ga 2L.-�Q' _ ^� +� �.V �L .A,iw u� �: v3' �`.� pL Cw v .°ro° t,+. ' ^'9 d� Nyyk u�oy38Z .5c lsl� id �LL U� w V Yi_M OI YyG W C V V Y C A L MC N ~ C a Y M6WN Yr OMV N� Yr W SN CycyC1O b L ►y }N NFL V4Y Y� OL. �O � fit+ Y YC L.p 7p� L YYL L� L`YY 4 L OS$A N9 S1Yr� !V m� .W V N E `ii 9 tiQ !Y �:' �N V W � CA s � C uN M L N Y C L r N M O L y Y L O NtY Q 13 r. all IE YC ■y£i q+.Tf o Vici Cr � pp N= O� L � �0Y `Ype 4 b L V A. ' N ml Uzi Y GG y per^ = =.c,g E L Su :i Jr� uy M CC6 aLp it W s 4�3 w 31. yu a� �� Mw L� a N b L as Rl poi .�.oy G v HE> r J 4 Y 10 0 'Rye T c y Z 0 9 N g Y C2 w =a �o � a � •. a u e. CC csu ��ffwc K.�Gi i0'fr'S b h: 1 O C ti O M c 3s i� °9 O� �4ya v Mar$ N L 75-1 My Y +tY Au b jab F t.51 t LLLr j� L gad N �o$ u a4 Lw , w V y a M Y « bu- �d�eeN 91 051 ��Q fah z a,l,. Vuy so r- rfi'M C Y �i 9�i 'lam V C� M .til pN f to kS ®M �a s: GGY C4 a a Y D Cq W ."'lO N M fy1 +IN•EYC a ,NeC � C q••. aye V v IL a` a tl S��pp Y N � it P O.J O lam ttY 1- N a. N M V ��Q fah z a,l,. Vuy so r- rfi'M C Y �i 9�i L a az CNC �O C� 1„ �rC iQ.` f to kS ®M �a s: GGY C4 a Cq W ."'lO C.GM1 �yy /iA ,�y ii a�Y appe iV O. ,NeC a Y Y V tl S��pp Y N � it P O.J O lam ttY 1- N a. 11 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 1 ?332 - CRISTIANO - A custom IR rezident'a subdivision to `-151 lo s on app,.°oximately 85 acres of land in tihe Very Low Residential District (less than : dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Haven Avecee north of the Hillside Drainage Channel - APR: 20.1. 121 -24. I. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting a one year extension for the remaining 151 lots in Tract 12332. The Planning Commission may grant extension up to 24 months at a tune; however, the maximum time period for approval shall not exceed five ;years from the original approval date. ?I. BACKGROUND: Tentatz;ie Tract 12332 (204 lots on 141 acres) was originally—approved " i, the Planning Commission on MV, 11, 1983. The applicant then `•oceeded to record Phase I consisting of 53 1atj lbui fai ?cat ic) e<:ard the remainder of the tract resulting in the expiration of the tract asap. Sub!:64uently, zhe applicant received a new a.Oproval on February 12, 1985 for the remaining 151 lets. On December 2, 1987, the applicant requested a on,, year extension ct time in which to record '';: tract map. T:te time extension request was presented to ?be .tanning Comiss.goa on January 27, 1988. During the meeting, hcmaowners within the existing portion of Tract 12332 ;Haven View Estates) er ssed con,ern about the design of the tract map relating to t' :rmited access, the width of tw east /west collector streets, and the rolled design of some street intersections. Because of these concerns, the Planning Commission continued the ites to March 9, 1988. At the March 9, 1988, meeting, staff presented information pertaining to the concerns of the existing residents (See Exhibit "9 "). After reviewing this information and considering all public input on the proposal, the Planning Commission approved a orte year time extension for the tract with a new expiration date of February 12, 1989, ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAGF REPORT TIME EXTENTION TENTATIVE TRACT 15332 - CRISTIANO January 11, 1989 Page 2 El Following the Planning Commission tweeting, an appeal was filed with the City Council by the homeowners of Haven View Estates. On May 18, 1988, the City Council approved a one year time extension (to February 12, 1989) subject to a condition that an additional access for emergency vehicles be provided from the easterly boundary of the tract extanding to the Deer Greek Channel. This access was to be graded and comp'xcted to the satisfaction of the �oothill Firs District. Also, 0�nVissf n was �o be obtained t-omt the Flood Control District to use the existinir service road adjacent to Doer Creek Channel as part of the emergency access rcute. = II. ANALYSIS: Ir analyzing. the proposed time extension request, st--ff ceT•effs— Wat the circumstances surrounding the tf��:�e extension have not significantly changed over the toast year. As identified in the January 27, 1968 staff report, 19 'dots otkt of the 151 lots have frontages that do not meet the minimum of 50 feet. These 19 lots range in frontage from 40 to 48 feet. these lots are, however, located on cul -de -sacs and have an a -v.a of over 8,000 square fe& more tha'i the average size of tine remaining lots witnir, the tract. This in.onsistency is not AansidW, to be significrint by staff and will not significantly Ater the deveUpment #if the project. This, in conjunction with the added conditions frty the pprevious time extension, would result in a subdivision that i in keeping with the intent of the General Plan and the Deveiopeent Code. III. RECrMENDATIAN; Staff recomeiettds that the planning Commission approve Uve " ime exihnsisn through adoption of the attached Resolution. ARie WS, 88.,SM:js Attachments. Exhibit 'A" Lotter from Applicant Exhibit "6' Plaitning Commission Staff Report, (larch 9, 1988) Resolution of Approval THE CRISTLANO COM zNZ � CITr AN OCT) Fla Octoher 27, 199 Mr. Scott Murphy Associate Planner City of Rancho CacaMtnga 9320 "C" Baselines Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 SUBJECT: Request for one -year extension on Tentative Tract 12332 Dear Scott: Fnclosed is our $62.00 filing fee foggy a ore -yes; eutension on Tentative Tract #12332. Pl,eaa,s* place our request on t is earliest possible agenda. If you have any questionri, ploace feel free to contact rye. sincerely, Robert J. Cristiano General Partner Cristiano Partners I RJC:CIS Enclosure 440014;ithnh srik- ute,.am,5uile780.lYew ch.0 alifomia92660 (714)47/6-0101 MMfinBAddrewPost =M'MxA2i6.NrwnnttBcsch.CAifor I2926" ---- -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 9, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Sen%r Civil Engineer SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12332 - CRIr %ANO - A custom lot resident-f-a-F-su-bdivisi7on--oVI51 lots on approximately 85 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than two dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Haven Avenue north of the Hillside Drainage Channel - APN 201 - 121 -24 I. BACKGROUND On January 27, 1988, the Planning Commission reviewed a request for a time extension for the above- referenced project. during the meeting, homeowners within the tract, expressed uincern about three areas of the tentative tract deign: A. The width of the east -west collector streets, B. The humped design of the street intersections, and C. Limited access to the tract. On February 24, 1988 the Planning, Commission continued the project to Provide staff more time to prepare a response to the Homeowners concerns. It. ANALYSIS: 14. Street Widths: The homeowners requested that the mtaro collector streets within the Tract be increased from the ai��,dved width of 32 feet to the city local street standard of 36 feet. The streets which are 32 feet wide art shown by a dashed line on Exhibit "A ". All other streets are a6 feet wide. The streets which are 32 e-:et wide and posted for no parking on both sides will provide for better traffic flow than 36 foot wide streets with parking, because their is less "side friction" caused by the Parked ca-s. This parking restriction should not cause a parking deficiency, because no lots front on the streets. The other streets are sufficiently wide for parking on both sides, and the lots are large with long driveways. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 12332 - CRIZ rANO COMPANY is MARCH 9, 1988 PAGE 2 B. Hufaped Intersections: The homeowners expressed concern for the apparently exaggerated humps on the dr,+�nhi11 leg of the streets intersecting with the main collector str-Its. As stated by tha Developer's Engineer (letter attached), these humps were installed as a drainage control measure. For the developed Phase of the Tract (TR 12332 -1), it was decided that it was a safer and more economical design to contain drainage within the main streets and prevent it from entering the cul de sac streets. The only way to accomplish this was to raise the entrances to the cul -de -sacs, which, in conjunction with the steep strut grades, rosulted in the exaggerated humps. The conceptual gradin,2 plan for the rest of the project does not propose this design. C. Access: The homeowners requested that an additional access be provided from the easterly portion of the ►roposed Tract connecting to come street other than Haven Avenue i;l the eveni..that Haven Avenue is made impassible. The project currently has two points of connectijn to Haven Avenue, theeifore meets the intent of the Devalopmtnt Code regarding secondaev access, These connections provide adequate street capacity to serve- the traffic from the 53 existing lots plus the 151 lots proposed by the rest of the development. The Staff reconmendation is that an additional access connection will not be necessary Until development rf the currently vacant triangular Aroperty adjacent to the Tract north hounJary and the Flood Control district (SBCFCD) property adjacent to the Tract east wryundary (refs to Exhibit "B"). A master plat showing 42 lot, for t�— northerl, property is shown on Exhibit "A ", anU a master plan for the easterly property showing 52 lots is shown' on Exhi,�it "Cu. Access for further d<delopment bT,ond the houndaries of Trac> 12332 can be acec�eplis�ied by extending streets from this tract nor�:rerly to the triang,;lar property and easterly through the SBCFCG, property, then southerly across a brine ove^ Hillside Channel to either Hille -ide Road: or Wilson Avenue as shown on Exhibit "11% The construction of the access will be a requirement of the C.evelopment of the zriangular and /ors the 59CkCO pra arty. Once constrmted, this access can serve both Tracts 12332 and 12332. ,r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 12332- CRISTIANO COMPANY MARCH 9, 1968 PAGE `s III. COdCIUSIONs It appears that the concerns expressed by the homeowners within Tract 12332 -1 will be addressed by 1he administrative clarification of conditions of approval included in the attached r4olution. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends 'chat the Planning Commission consider all input and elements on this matter. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommendation of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution with a clarification of conditions would be appropriate." ! Respectfully submitte'', J Barry Hanson Senior Civil Engineer 1 WJS:BRH:dlw Attachments: Exhibit "A" M Y-rrow Street Locations Exhibit "R" - Area Circulation Plan Exhibit "C" - SBCFCO Property Master Plan Resolution of Approval Prior Staff Reports _ I ��_ �!.__., ♦ i� :I,' r��`cE.�`•.all //�%1��\ � �• n 7a' ��..L'vC,1 ' ,. � - ' l�: � iw . / It i nd its toe • � +�� � ' I a - � J jai � L V ♦ _– � \. k earn - ^�_ �DI-7 -`-- sx shvdfs14r:1foo/s efc, MY OF „AWCHO CUCMONGA aR 1 El t -_ �G T. 3S �31 I 39 a t- ry \13 r "_� ' rlA � F_uz As r —.c ` 9 9 - �L 1, 1 i I i UASWR PLAN OHOWIxQ FeielWe OUTCee Dete6/4ieeT e/ Tow 76GJe ceeteei ue►elet aAeec CAST $O TINTOTICe T %ACT we. Ima �i C'ppV N Ce'F sbPA Q *On RMCHO CUCAMONGA 9wipic Alat�9 MGMZMWG DWOON Em I Me D -ct RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSi,% APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT N4. 12332 AND MAILING FINDINGS iN SUPPORT THEREOF - APH: 201 - 121 -24 A. Recitals. (i) The Cristidno Company has filed an application for the extension of Tentative Tract No. 12332 as described in the title of this Resolution. hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On February 12, 1986, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 86 -23, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time iimits, Tentative Tract N4. 12332. (iii) On March 9, 1988, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 88 -53, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions, a cne year time extension for Tentative Tract 12332. (iv) On May 18, 1988, the City Council, after receiving all information on an appeal. of the time extension, adopted its Resolution No. 88- 344, thereby approving, subject Ito, specific conditions, a one year time extension: for Tentative Tract 1.2332. (v) Ali legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. - B, Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in Ve Recitals, Bart A, of this Resolution are true c�.d correct. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including xritten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specific;'Ily finds as follows: (a) The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, CodE` and 'Policies; a +1d (b) The extension of toe, Tentative Map will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and ( Policies; and D,16 i( }t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12332- '1RISTIANO January 11, 1939 Page 2 (c) The exteisioA of the TentatiHe Map is not likely to cayse pu(ilic health.an safeV, iroblems; and (d) The extension is within ithe time limits prescribed by state law and local ordtnance, 3. Saved upon the findiiils and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for; Tract Applicant Expiratic 12332 Cristiano Company February 12, 1990 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC)NONGA BY: Larry , WNW, Chairman { ATTEST: Brad-Buller, Wretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and rAgularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular Heating of tfte Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January, 1989, by the following !lute -to -wit; AYES: COMMISSSIWERS: NOES: COWSSIONFERSt ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: CITY OF RAN""HO CUCAMONGA ST'AM'P REPORT. DATE: January 11;, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission' FROM: ,Brad Buller, City planner BY: Scoter *,+rphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MPPHIPE TRAIL I. SACKGROW: On Deceeber 14, 1909, the Planning Commission reconsid'i!red the level of trail improvement for the west side of Sapphire Street, south of Banyan Street. At that time, the Commission recommended that the trail widthz.:d ext -not of fencing was adequate. The attached mmrandum to tNe City Council was prepared by Staff fol',owing the meeting ;sa reflect the actions of the Planning Commission. II. RECOWENDATION: If the memorandum is consistent with the actions "the annIng Commission, it would -be appropriate for the Comission to forward the memos ndum and the minutes of the December 14, 1988 meeting to the City Council, Res lly submi d, /Bra er i ty P river BB: SK. j s Attachments: City Council Memorandum ITEM E CI'T`Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NUMORArD 7 DATE; Jawtary 18, 1989 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: - Chairman and Members of the Planning Dam ission SUBOECT: SAPPHIRE TRAIL Y. RECOWENDATiON: The Planning Commission recommends that the 0ty oCuntM. — ei eTermine that the width of the tram and the extent of fencing are appropriate for this area. II. BACKGROUND: On December 14, 1988, the Planning Commission reca nssidered the issue regarding the level of improvements desired for the Community Trail located on the west side of Sapphire Street, south of Banyan Street. During the :meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed two video tapes, one prepared by the Alta. Loma Riding Club and the other prepared by the residents of the Marble - Celestite Tract, depicting various Situations regarding the use of Conwinity Trails by both horses and pedestrianf. In addition:, the Planning Commission also received.public testimony presented by the two groups., After viewing the video tapes and concluding the public WAring, the Planning commission ietervineu that the width of the trail and tho extent of 'the fencing that currently exiEts was adequate and that this recommendation be forward to the City Council TO support the recommendation t) the _City Council, the Planning Commission concluded the followinD: 1. Based upon actual use of the trail and the information depicted in the video tapes, that there was adequate trail width for equestrians U ride side by side, to pass other horses, and to pass pedestrians ir< a safe manner. 2. The fencing along the street increases the safety of the trail by reducing the chances of a serious accident caused by pedestrians ov horses stepping out into the street into on- coming traffic. 3. The location of the fencing, as recnded by the Public Safety Coomaission, allowr for adequate site distance visibility for automobiles exiting the public streq=.ts onto Sapphire Street. r R 1 MAYOR /COUNCIL MEMORANDUM SAPPHIRE TRAIL January 18, 1989 Page 2 4. The drive approach located where the equestrian trail intersects Sapphire Street should remain open to allow for access by equestrian related used. Staff should ontinue to monitor the situation and if problems and /or misuse of the equestrian trail and drive approach arise, extending the fencing across the drive approach may be pursued. 5. The Trails Advisory Committee should review all plans for retrofiting existing trails to make sure that adequate trail width exists prior to installation of the fencing. PC:SM:js r .� b� DATE: January 1,1, 1989 TO: Chairman and MemberL of the Planning temission FROM: Barrye 9. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: 7ENN�VIti -- MENTAL ASSESS.'ENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL M.P 11934 - L. subdivision o 6« 2 acres of a1 n-d- f-W- parcr s -fin -the Medium Density Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), located on the east W% of Aei:hibald Avenua approximaUtly 16O feet soLtti on Avenue (APR 201- 262.03) I BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the December 14, 1988 Planning Comiission Meeting in order to allow additional time for the applicant to review the revised conditions of approval handed out at the meeting and to clarify the land use designation for the area. The December 14, 1988, Staff Report is attached. j I: DISCUSSION: if A. Conditions of Approval: The conditions of approval require that the cost of ^proving Rrchibald Avenue along the project frontage be reiursdd to the City upon development of Parcel 2. The purchaser of Parcel 2 contene that the property owner had an agreement with the City stating that thD Improvements were installed in exchar!;^ for the necessary -right of way to complete the City project, Staff contends that the agreement only pertains to tie property if it remains at its currant use, a single family resideice. If the use changes (a subdivision in this case), then the reimbursement of improvement costs is appropriate, because those improvemW, , would have been required as itandard procedure for u;3e subdivision. l ITEM F -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT i iz (Suppier�ntal) I BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the December 14, 1988 Planning Comiission Meeting in order to allow additional time for the applicant to review the revised conditions of approval handed out at the meeting and to clarify the land use designation for the area. The December 14, 1988, Staff Report is attached. j I: DISCUSSION: if A. Conditions of Approval: The conditions of approval require that the cost of ^proving Rrchibald Avenue along the project frontage be reiursdd to the City upon development of Parcel 2. The purchaser of Parcel 2 contene that the property owner had an agreement with the City stating that thD Improvements were installed in exchar!;^ for the necessary -right of way to complete the City project, Staff contends that the agreement only pertains to tie property if it remains at its currant use, a single family resideice. If the use changes (a subdivision in this case), then the reimbursement of improvement costs is appropriate, because those improvemW, , would have been required as itandard procedure for u;3e subdivision. l ITEM F PLANNING da4~i3ssram STAFF REPORT TPM 11934 - L. A. Chanco, Inc. January 11, 1989 Pape 2 8. Land Usr Dest n� atior,: The Tentative Parcel Map was advertised as Medium Density (8 -14 dwelling units per acre (QUA)) as shown on the General Plan (Exhibit "D "). Several area residents, who attended the December 14, -1988, Planning Qomissien tieeting, expressed their concern for this high densl,V, i,F yr further review, it ryas noted that the Development District drsi'gnattion for, thr: site Low - Medium Density (4-�. DVA) as shoran on Exhibit "E ". The size of °ne proposed parcels (Parcel 1: 0.61 acres - 1.96 OUA and 2,21 acres = 4.46 DUA) far exceed the more restrictive �,E,signatton of 4 -8 QUA. The density of the portion of proposed Tentative Tract No, 14125 within Parcel 2, currently in tha review p ocess, is approximately S.2 QUA, which is within the 4 -8 QUA designation. On OeceffWr 28, 1968, the Planning Conv0fsion directed staff to initiate ar; amendment to modify the General Plan land use designation for tnt. area from medium (8 -10, DUA) to Low- Medium (4- 8 QUA) to contspond with the Development ;District designation. III CONCLUSION: Stiff feel, that the conditions of arprova: are appropriate for the project and that the parcels to be created by the subdivision are acceptable under the current General plan Designation and are consistn' with the future development of the area. IV RECOMMENDATIQ'd: Y, is recommended that tl:e Planning Commission consid•r all input dnd elements of the Tentative Parcel Hap, If after such consideration, Via Commission can recon*nd apprc. +al, then the adoption of the attaches Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be apF.F ,riate. R�spectfuliy submitted, �iRt� :CIS: sins Attachments: Portion of General Plan (exhibit *5'), Portion of Development District ( Exhfbit "E ") Staff Report of December 14, 1988 Plannirg &omission Minutes of December 14, 1988 11 LANE) USE PLAN RESIDENTIAL VERY L(-)W< 2 GU's AC LOW 2-4 DUS AC LOW-MEDIUM 4-8DUS AC k4EDIUM 8-14 DUS AC ..... 01. MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU's AC 1=1i HIGH 24-30 DU S AC �Lj JHffllgide W q it CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA W-r!MEEMG DIMIM, Chaffey Colle( Is a� am WE wit ■ rML. PARCEL I AP 11934_ TM& UNEML PLAN (LMh gl�cvQ Rug--W. It 0 it .......... ■ rML. PARCEL I AP 11934_ TM& UNEML PLAN (LMh gl�cvQ Rug--W. It 0 it RESIDENTIAL 07,_3 VERY LOW Z 2 DU AC C= LOW 2-4 DU. AC LOW-MEDIUM 4-8 DU AC MEDIUM 8-14 DU AC MEriUM-HIGH 14-24 DU AC HIGH 24-30 DL AC 74 rt Cin 01, RAN04r.40 CUCMONGA4. ENCINOMMG DM%ON Coe IL k" 1-111 Im N rM.-PAPMELMAP 111134 Tm&.MvBZW,F.NT t. F t * * * * PUB@ IC NWINGS I. i um ns ty Residential District t8 -14 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 150 feet south of Lemon Avenue - APN: 2.01- 252 -03. Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer, presented the staff report and revised Special Condition 2 to require reimbursement to the City of one -half width street improvements on An.-loiba1d fronting parcels 1 and 2, relocation s` temporary retaining walls, and installation of missing street improvements. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Albert Dayton, Pfeiler a Associates Enginforing, re-quested a continuance to discuss the changed condition. He stated the property had been purchased on the basis that ArchibaU would be improved and they wouldn't have to pay for it. ' Connie Corcoran, 9859 yto s Ckksc aie item wouldbe continued aspecific ate 4ndased Cucamonga, wanted could benotifd of that date. Chalr±ian McNiel stated residents could sign up and the City would send notice to them of future hearings. Laurence Gast, asked if the zoning had already been approved. Chairman McNiel stated the xening was approved, as was the General Plan.. Mr. Gast stated he had previously attended a meeting on another tract, and thought no more multiple housing or medium to high density pwojects wou'd be constructed above Highland. Chairman McNiel suggested he stop by City Hall and look at the General Plan with one of the Planners to familiarize himself with the zoning for the area. Scott Anderson, 98M Liberty, was shocked to find out the area was =nRd medium and askcid if there was a possibility apartments would be built. Chairman WHO stated the possibility existed because of the zoning. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineers, stated the itwit being considered was merely a par:,:l map to separate the house from the remaining parcel.. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, had just P^ loomed at the zoning map and the area was actually zoned Low - Medium crnsity ` W (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). Planning Cesmission Minutes -9- December 14, 1988 Ms. Corcoran asked if that meant apartments wound not be built. Mir. Buller responded that apartments would not likely he profitable at thrt IrA a density. t40tion: Mtovv- by Chitiea, seconded by BlakesM,zV, unanimously carried, to r,gntinue Envi,.nw.Antal hssessment and Tentative Parcel Flap 11934 to January 11, 1989. Chairman &Niel asked Ms. Corcfra r if she would alert the surrounding residents of the rnntinued date. Ms. Corcoran ^f mAed that she would. * * * *4 J. Eke `" '.EKTA! ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -2P - SMITH - The meal in or on apar d un I tis an ex s Ing apar ns complex consisting of 63 units on 5.83 acres of land in the medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side. of Archibald Avenue, south of Chearch Street - APR: 1077 - 332 -25. Chairman KcNiel stated that the applicant `ad requested Continuance to Jfivaarya 25, 1989. W-t opened the public hearing. Motion: kved by Blakesles, sr: =.dtd by Chitiea, unanimously carried, is continue Eovironmental Asser-saeht and Development Ifteview SC-26 to January 25, 1989. *a�w� K. ENVIROWZKTAL ,A5SES5KW AND G01WiTi®WAL U5E PERMIT 46-49 - biros Ut3 WLN RESTAU- reque$ estsh d An-s tuns— 0—ap- on -in an existing 2,160 square foot restaurant on 4.05 acres of land in the Rancho Cucamo%& Village Shopping Center, located at the northeast corner of F'onthill Baulwiard and Ramona Avenue - AF'N: 11377-621 - 34. Steve Hayes, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. C6'tairun MicKiel opened the public heFring. Skip Mal:,on, owner, -7ated he was available to am questions. Chairman M4cMNiel asked hart the restouro at would serve cocktails PAthout a bar. Mir. Welson stated they planned to aria: drinks in the kitchen to serve at theh di -ping tables. Nearing no further .eshA.:a s..M public hearing was dosed. AML Ccmis'`aner Chitiea :Mated the operation seewd to be clearly a dinner house - type operation and s4a supp%wAd the use. Plannino tcamission li nutes -10- December 14, 19118 - CITY OF RAI TWO !CUCAMONGtL STAFF RFP!��t`T DATE: Do.comber 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and hers of the Planning Commission FRONT: Barrye T. Hanson, Senior Civil engineer BY: Jae Stofa Jr., Associate Civil Cngineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONI EkT' Al. ,ASSESS!'W jiWD TEk:.. i IVE PARCF'. MAP 11934 a L. A. LAA TOIRTED - A'suG v s onof2.7 .arcs 7 arc nto parcels it tiie"-fle-F:ir. Density _Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per a:re), located on W east side of Arehib-ild avenue appr3ximately 150 feet south of Lemon Avenue (APN 201 -252 -0311 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action__Re_gu_e_steeck Rpproval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Flap as sMo-m- 5- �ER UT- rB" B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 0.51 Acre4 Parcel 2 - 2.21 Acre% C. Exiting Zoning: k—idential (8 -14 Dwelling UniWAveld D. 5urracindina Land use: North - Residential South „ Jacant East Vacant West - Residential E. Surrou;iding General Pl-�m and Development Code Designat'oros: North - Residential South - Residential East - Residential West - Residential 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENT. PM 11334 L. A. CH.ANCO, INCORPORATED DECEMBER 14, 1988 PAGE 2 i F. Site Characteristics: The site contaifm an existing house on p<.posed parcel 1 witty an existing barn on proposed parcel 2. The land slopes approximatel, 3% to the south. C f It. PLYSIS: [� The purpose of this Parcel Map is to create 2 sep:�.ate r- reels. The ' existing house 4iil remain on - parcel 1 and parcel 2 will hac,)me a portion of the Future Tentative Tract 14US, which is currently in the review proc`ss (Exhibi`. "C "). GTh4 street improvements along Archibald .Avenue are currently r;mder j construction as pars: of a City Capital Improvement Project. III. ENVIROWZNTAi REVIEW: The applicant completed .Part I of °:he Initial �tu�y° attr co'r Led a field investigation and completed Part It of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon tha envIroMmut are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of ttgafive Declaration is appropriate. IC 4RRESPONDENCE - Notices of Public [fearing have been sent to surrounding 1roperty owndrs and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the ite has a`rsa been completed. Y. RiCOMME!4JATION: it is recommended that aye Piarning -ommission consider 7. r =nput ana *:I.eanU of the Tentative Parcel ftp. If a.ftar such considerations the Commission can recomend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negation Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye A. Hanson Senior C?vil Enginser BRH:JS:dlw Attr;chments: Vicinity Asap (EYhihit "A ") I Tentative Map (Exhibit "b") Future Tentative Tract 14125 (Exoibit "C ") Resolution and 02reua anAmA (`nnA4,%4Ane nF bnn.nuy3 MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -73 N ffrA. P►RLEL MRP I M34 Trrm.- VIUMIT'If MRP r.i ° -7 � 4 4 i 4 Y yp� II '`. ,i Rl �! g5 f 1111flopv F gm®!Viir� x�f .,,,A I w M w ar t G Ifi rod utam nw mim yam a w n at Ei i t. 'Pe" mew.:a not ®®. attt nr r� r �� O.1 S - � old' TIal11R 511CT O R p1A ti ra 4` ry��i lAnOm IR Q 1dt 6mA. W " PAA'dE.L ,41.4jt' M-0 I .6 V 7 0 4e. 17 f V � CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA R...:20W`M F. v PARIEL MAP 119.3.4 �a U ��� —TRACT No. 14125 falm2 wils fro 1 w V-1012L Moffl itlrmr SA num to SIX 2c ,•'Dial Pl. MY OF - RANCHO CUCAMONGA WrvniMWIG DIMON N • PAO.C.ELMAP 1%114 Tram PUTUPLE C. rc RESOLUTION NO. qW A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONPA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11934, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD A'JENUE APPROXIMATELY 156 FEET SOUTH JF LEMON AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IM SUPPORT THEREOF - APR 201- 252 -03 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Hap Number 11934, submitted by L. A. Cnaneo, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subd %,,iding into 2 parcels, the teal property situated in the City of Rancho C+:,:,cmonga, Coun':y of San Bflrnardina, State of California, identified as APH 201- 252 -03, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximate;y 150 feet south of Lemon Avenue; al, i WHEREAS, on January 11, 1939, t,Ne Planning Commission herd a duly advertised public hearing 4or the above - described map. N0W, THEREFORE, THE P.aiGHA CUCAMOKSA PLANNING COMMISSION PESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: ' SECTION 1: That the followlag findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General P1cn. 9. That the i4Krovement or the proposed subdivision is consistent wi:.h the General Plan., 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. a,. That tits proposed subdivision and ins rsvements will not cause substanti PLANNIHG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE PA.RCM MAP 11934 L. A. CHANCO, INC. JANUARY 11, 1119 PAGE 2 Davelo er may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopter cost for undergrounding from futare development (redevelopment? Nis it occurs on the opposite side of the street. q. Tho follnw�-1 retnting to the Archibald Avenue frontage of both Parcels 1 ant, 2 shall be comple`ed upon jevelopment of Parcel 2: a, The cost of eorstruction of one -half width street improvements fronting bath Parcels 1 and 2 shall be reimbursed to the City, b. The existing to ^>orary retaining walls located within thl street righf�--of -lay shall be relocated outside the street right -of -way in accordance with the approved City Drawing Number 1241, and i,. Any missing strew improvements including landscaping shall be installed. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS it7H DAY OF JANUAW 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ILAXHO CUCAMONGA BY: ar�"ry T. W.Niel , Chairman ATTEST: Srad Buller, Secretary I. B7-ad Buller, Secretarf of the Planning CoW sslQn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that ti-.- foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the�Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamoonga, at a regular moeting of the Planning Commicsion held on the 11th day of January, 1989, by the following ve0m -to- wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COW.USIONERS: GI/ V r-4 C p O, C 3 L r� Op C C �i t3A M ;• a'a� L 3 to 14 Y1 .pN N n S A Y � I6Y �' �y O P ■ ■■ 21" Ma Kati y wY.. � Q � ♦ A r 11j w� N •� v • p L N O y Ne" !pp�� _ � A Y V •�• YEN. a M I. ,p a � V A 9atj� 8'C 4 4 � op ®+• M gt[Y � • �!i � � Vp O iY 7' A � « d i,•, V •�+ V � eg a �u�(y Gf Ow .SOT •�V• G �y a Py pOiY RO � Y y ' �Y `cO sYNr N96 Y �O Ce..G Y n tlpAYV y ..LCC �•pOYA�¢� TM .- J� ^v, `. O �M W� I�� ��.W � � ��L YCOS4y� �`'Y Y6 _M SY� ~tJ �V66N fG6tY •Y L�L7 Lc ,7.7 'JCpYrq tpV•1.R :�y V V N� �� �'� O ri • .�i A' • � t. OfL" N � d0 .per �' A� 4�0.Ap Nld Clbi, 404 1nMY SA 1J iill .s0 ;• a'a� L 3 to 14 Y1 .pN N n S A Y � I6Y �' �y O P ■ ■■ 21" Ma Kati y wY.. � Q � ♦ A r 11j w� of ; Y 1 •• •e Q 4 • y �'e 4Ti a� CCC a$ I IL � °• •� QP o �° ��� �g i � � Y Y� t w 3t.� a aj ¢¢�fr • et c w Y fV M �V R N � any p° $/��fj 3 o pw� e� w - $° tl "s sr w is aii e$ rfu a eT a's }i U Ur 1.� „ ° A Y CC �N E =� .2y 66 t8g of ; Y 1 •• •e Q 4 • y �'e 4Ti a� CCC a$ I IL � °• •� QP o �° ��� �g i � � Y Y� t w 3t.� a aj ¢¢�fr • et c w Y fV M �V R N EI Em N � U 0 e� - $° tl "s sr w is aii e$ rfu N EI Em 7-7-7-7 ,7 "MC-21Z' -SS THU Aqanes'�-' Industries, Inc. 45d W.Stockee& - Glendale, CA 91202 Telephone. (818) 506-9393 December 2'-', 1988 Planning D-""tM=t City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Ran,:ho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Bevorly Nissen Dear Beverly:, - In accordance with my rn-ating this morning wi,'.1 t,presentsitives of the Engineering Departmampt, I hereby agree that, it, conoideration of Tentative Tract #14055 bain& scheduled for the January 11, 5.989 Planning Commission Meeting, I will consent to a continuance of the =tter from thal; meeting in the evcr.-, a &a unable to obtain a satis-factorl statement from X.H. Downey, Inc. r,4gar&Ing their easement ovez the subSict pt.,- ;,party. names ? Ross, Vice P=04&nt .Ava6ess Industries, Inc. jkmlbal CITY Cr RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DAT": January 11, 1989 TO: Chairman and h?embers of the Planning Commission FRC4: Brad Buyer, City Planner BY: Beverly Hisseea, bisistant Runner SUBJECT: I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 1405: AMESS" Yf� - e eve opmen a'F -- M-- t- 0KnTouse units on —10. cres of land in the Medium Density Residential District (8-14 dweilin� units per ac d)= located north of Arrow Highway and eL:r: f ;taker Avenue - AFN: 207 - 201 -72 and 12. PROJECT AND S,I'.E DESCRIPTION* A. Action Requested: Approval of the subdivision map, Site Plan, e�va ions, Conceptual Grading plan anO issuance of a W..Sative Declaratior. S. Project Density:: 11.2 dwelling units per acre. ". Surrounding Land Us6 and Zininr,: North - - biTTe"Flome " ar ; ca 6edi u<n Density Res{ aeati al (,4-8 dwelling units per acre). South - Single Fuji ly Residences; Medium Win! ;i ty Residential (8" -14 dwelling units per acre). East - Vacant; K+%dium Density Residential t`, -14 dwelling units per acre). West - Baker Avenue and SIngie FMily Residential boyond; NIedllw Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre). D. General Plain Desi nations: 'sec 513 eE` ar North - Low- Nedium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) Smith - P*V k East Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling traits per acre) West - Mediun Residential (0 -14 dwelling units per acre) E. Site Characteristics The p >oject site is aj :rrently vacant txcept for traller and RV storage in tl ;e nor" -ern portion of The site adjacent to tale mobile home parse. to site slopes gently fr i-ii the nortirmt tc- the southeast. A dirt road currently Crosses the site diagonally, which provides access IT5M G PLANNING cowrssm STAFF REPORT TT 14055 - AVANESS INOUSTRXES January 12. 1959 Page 2 r.1 from the mobile home park in the northeast to Baker Avenue. A dirt road connection between the two mobile home p4rks also exists on the site. F. Parking: "se required number of parking for the site is 265 spaces w"iicn would include 230 spaces in enclosed garages, 29 visitor spaces ane 5 handicapped spaces. The applicant has provided 7 spaces in excese of the required for a total of 293 spaces. I`, INALYSIS• A. Senerals The proposed development consists rf 115 townhouse s y e units which are grouped int 3, 4, 5 and 6- piexes. The proposed units range in size from 1,100 to 1,500 square feet and all have 2 or 3 bedrooms. All units are two story, except for four (4), which are located on the ends of some of the 5- plexes. All of the units are Mediterranean in character with off -white stucco exterior and the roofs. The applicant is proposing a six foot stucco wall around the perimeiL.t of the project, as well as st:ucct patio balls. An access aanment across the property currently exists in the form of an 'unimproved dirt road across the site which connects the mobile ioma park on the northeast to taker Avenue. Although this exact alignment is not being followed in the current propesa'., the applicant has provided two aeyess pnints from the proposed project site to she mobile home park, which wM d still al'ow aesidents of the park to reach alther Arrow Highway or Baker Avenue. B. Neighborhood Meetin A neighborhood meeting was conducted on M,. erer - -n at which approximately 28 residents attended. Attendees primarily resided in the two mobile home parks to the nArth of the pro3e�t site. Most of the coRS<nents related to retention of the accessway between the -mobile � mne park and Baker Avenue. The applicant has provided two points of access between the proposed project and the mobile hc, park to the northeast. However, residents of the mobile home park were also concerned wivh traffic from the proposed project through their mobile home park and the possibility that traffic from Foothill Boulevard short cutting through the mobile ho:re park to Aprow High*gy and Baker Avenue would increase. The applicant responder to this by proposing that the access roads have z. sliding 3a�ii_d at their common property line, to which .xsly the mobile' home park residents would M.p a key. Residents also ,ioiced concern over the constructlon sex`- le and wanted sore type of ass4rance that construction or gradin t..s PLAHNNG Mi- MISSION Vfirr s'tEPMT TT 14-065 - AVANE5S INW TRIES January .11, 1989 Page 3 would not occur pan weekends or in the early iaorning hours. The resieents were also concerned with dust control on the site. Th a!apl #cant - ssur -& the residents he would have no problem campiying with' the above roquest, ;. A summary of the r;;.ighborhood sleeting as weri as & list of the attendees is prcvfded in an attachment. gee `riew t:o+tnaitt..^�. The^ peesign Review committee (Chitiea a es a;;- Xr`r, 11) FF ntal)v r�eVewed the project on October 6, 1988 a:+d 4ii� i" nt opprove it due to the followitzg concerns: 1. The project appear{ to be over-built for the site and tie buildings generally ware loc -ited too close to each other. 2. The streetgcape along they main spine road ,could be unattractive with parallel parking on one sidii and the potential for parked car,, in driveways across the street. 3. The amount of usabl.- open space was not sufficient, 4. Stared p�Mo walls between indi:tidual units were ideivifieu as a problem areas. S. The units along the tortkc tier should be to provide a wro varied streatscaae. A revised project consist.og of seven 'less units (for a tot.: of 115) was presented to the Comittee (Chitiea, TolsZZ y Kroutil) on December g, 19W. 'ire Committee approved the Project with the fo41vwing conditions and directed the applicant to bring the modi,icntions back as a cont;,,,qnt catendar i tem.- 1. The Baker- Avenue and Arrr., P41hway frontages and the side elevation of tine twit at tl Baker Avenue entry should b, upgraded to be consistent with the "level of detail provi W on all front elevations. Upgrading should include multi - paned windem;a, fascia trial, etc. 2. The Arrow #tigtrray entry should be significantl;+ upg *Reel with so,-4 ty-ee of decorative treat>wnt similar to tl -, �t provNed at the Baker Avdque entry. t of Ica olantor wall may be incorporated. r 3. 1M wall al o,. j Oe Baker Avenue frontage should not be six feet in height, but three feet instead, Wrogght iron eMy be used on tap, if d4sired for security purpov'es. C 701 -C 01- x.1_89 CSC Agenda �; of 4 PLANNING cOmissioN STAFF REPORT TT 14055 - AVANESS INDUSTRIES January 11, 1989 Page 4 4. The second sidewalk alung Baker Avenue, within the interior of the project site should be denoted. The above mrtdifications were reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Orutil, Fmerick, McNiel) as a Consent Calendar item in December 22, 1998. The project was approved with the fallowing conditionE. 1. The low garden wail along the Baker Avenue frontage should b9 upgraded with a decorative cap and/or some type of the detail. 2. Additional trees should be provided at the Baker Avenue and Arrow Highway entrys- D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the project one- tc°-3,8, and December 8, 1988 and did not approve it due to the following concerns: 1. Artifical',y elevated slopes along P. -east property line. 2. Double wail situations and other property line conflicts. Revised plans were submitted and the,lv'rajing Committee reviewed and approved the plans on December Xft, ISS8 with the following condition: 1. Any unresolved property line conflicts are to be resolved prior to permit issuance. E. Environmental Assessment, Staff has completed the En-virom.*ntat Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this praj,ct. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, Issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate if the tentative tract is approved. III_ FAITS Fl)R FIW019GS: The project is consistent with the General aFt' n and the Development Code. 'me projer,`_ with the added mitigation measures, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisance or significant civironmental impacts. In addition, the p,opo ed use and site plan, together with the recoanended conditions of approval, Ore in compliance with the app.icable provisions of ti :e Developrent Code and City Standards. Ex PLANNING C"ItSION STAW REPORT - 14055 - AMANESS INDUSTRIES Jdnuary 11, 1989 Page 5 IV. CGRIRESPONDENCE, This item has been advertised as a, p!z'- -lic lhm -ing in IN Daily Ve ort newspaper and notices were sent :o all krope.rty owners w,. n tf i'e(tt,of the project site. V. REC *.'ICNDATION- Sta4f,e recommends that the Planning Commission apptaeTent` tie Tract 14055 ' through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with 'Conditions and issue a Negative Declaration. i C / Br�a'c�N ity P a r BB:BN:m''g Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Preliminary Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plar: Exhibit "A" m Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - F oposed Master Plan Exhibit "F" - Fuildk�g Elevations .Exhibit "G" Suamary of Neighborhood Meeting and List of Attendees Resolution of'Approval with Conditions for Tentative Tract Resolution oaf Approval with Conditi,rns for Design Review G (VITY OF R,AMIT-10 CLICAINI)NGA PLANNM r*AVP,-W QL 4 rt si CITY Of RANCFD CUCAM(XGA TITLE, PLAINNINTO DIVSM Mar.. scALE: UM It I It I I Iv IMP 'I 4, wi. Illisill li4lass alit IA� 4--.t lot rr :fly moll "fit --ft. IN ISM #111 ...... It 1 .0-4 i ► +uuumumra4��i�n�!91�I�pllri�ur �.� °�� m��nuu�tit�ti OUT � ; w A : : ■ . r rte•.■ _. r rte•.■ E NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTES FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14055 OCTOBER 27, 1988, 7 :30 P.M. LION'S COMMUNITY CENTER Attendees were primarily residents of the two trailer parks to the north of the site. The developer made a short presentation to the audience which was followed by a question and answer session. Following is a list of concerns voiced by the residents: 1. Re l-dants were concerned with the distance, between their holes a;d the proposed project. The developer responded that the proposed buildings are 30 feet away from the property line and that a six foot masonry wall would be constructed on the property line. In addition, patio walls and perimeter landscaping are proposed within the 30 foot set back area. The residents responded that they hoped the proposed landscaping would not include pine trees. 2. Concern was expressed regarding windows on second stories. Residents preferred that no windows be placed on the second story level on those buildings adjacent to the north property line. The residents' felt that they would lose their privacy and would be living in a "fish bowl" if windows were permitted. The developer stated that windows would be provided on second story levels. However, the architect pointed out that the living room/dining room areas had cathedral ceilings and that a second story floor would not be constructed in this area. One or two bedroom windows or a bathroom window per anit iiere explained as being the only ones which someone could look out of. The developer also explained that perimeter landscaping would help eliminate some of the fish bowl affect. The residents, although pleased that living /dining rocs windows would not actually be functional, still seemed to hava some concerns regarding windows on second story levels. 3. The residents had concerns regarding the two points of through access between their trailer parr and the proposed project. Although the residertc wanted to ensure they had access out of their park to Arrow Highway and Baker Avenue, they did not want to residents of the proposed condominiums to take access through NEIGHBORHOOD MEETIM, OCTOBER 27, 198IJ TENTATIVE TRACT 1 i Page 2 their streets to Foothill Boulevard. They were concerned with children on bicycles roaming through their mobile home panic. They also pointed out that many non- residents currently use their park for a shortcut from Foothill Coulevard to Arrow Highway and felt this activity would be increased if access was provided straight through their site. The applicant recognized the concerns of the residents regarding the above paints but had no concrete solution to the problem ct the time of the meeting. However, after the meating the developer raised the question of using some type of one -way the south hued allow the mobile home park residents access to prohibit access for condominium residents to the north. The Engineering Division is currently! exploring the feasibility of this solution. It appear,, as though it could meet the requirement of providing access across the site for mobile home park tenants whip addressing the concerns of the surrounding, residents. 4. One resident expressed conct; !% th-4t access was being cut off between the two mobile home parks by development over the dirt loop road. The developer explaiinad that although the loop road which is currently utilized would no longer be available that residents of the eastern most trailer park would be able to utilize the road through the proposed tract, exi-'u onto Baker Avenue and turn right into the neighboring park. S. The owner of the M,A.P parcel on the horthwest corner requested that a higher than six foot wall be placed adjacent to his property. City staff explained that a maximum 8 foot wall could tae placed in this area if a Minor Exception was approved. Bath the applicant and home -owner want to pursue this. 6. Finally, residents had general concerns regarding the construction schedule. They would like sore type of assurance from the City that construction wild not occur on weekends or in the early morning hours. They also wanted assurance that water trucks would be utilized on the site to minimize dust during construction periods. T. in addition to the above concerns the reWents had additional questions regarding problems in the area. The group in general voiced fear and concern regarding the "labor Gawp" on —+ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETTU, OCTOBER 27, 198£3 TENTATIVE TRACT 1 sr Page 3 i Arrow h*. They felt the City was generally unresponsive to f their concerns, They noted that shortly after the area was cleaned up, trLivJsivnts moved back into the vacant lot. I Cnn.. -rrn regarding traffic on Foothill Blvd. was also expressed. They expressed the difficulty they have entering /exiting the park from Foothill Blvd. They also expressed the need for a signal at Baker and Foothill. It was explained that this would\ - .;asst likely be constructed in 19890 Some residents stated that they have been promised n signal for years avid were fairly skeptical that, a signal woMO ever be constructed. I indicated that I would confirm t:rr_ schedulf.i construction for the traffic signal and.�try to get a more definite answer for theta, I NJ At {^ �e oP cc . . S"z: * 112 ?.,Z .''c es T,f �'E t 1 ��' �✓(� ��s' -�C3i� At {^ �e oP cc . . S"z: * 112 ?.,Z .''c es T,f RESOLUTION hO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C"ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CJCMONGA APPROV 74 TENTHi': E TRACT MAP NO. 14055, THE DEVELOPMENT OF 15 TOWNHOUSE UNITS ON 10.27 ACRES OF LAND, LDCPTED NORTH OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND EAST OF BAYER AVENUE IN ;HE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS t ACRE), AND MING FINDINGS IN SUPPMT THEP`' APN: 207 - 201.32 AND 12 A. Recitals. (i) Avaness Industries has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Rap ho. 14055 as described in the title of this Resolution. Heretiafter in this Resolution, the subject Tertative Tract Map request is referred Lu as "the application". (ii) On tim, 11th o? January, 1589, the Planning Commission of the ey of Rancho Cucamonga cond6cted a duly noticed public hedrinv on the apl4:;ation and concluded -said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution •e occurred. B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, it is Nereby found, determined and resolved, by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1� This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution arc, true and co• ^rect. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Cc mission 41ering the above - referenced public )nearing on January 11, 1989, including mitten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to pmpertf located north of Arrow Highway and east of Baker Avenue with a street frcn2ar2 of 132 feet along Arrow Highway and 198 feet al�;ng Baker Avenge and is presently vacant, excapt for two unimproved dirt roaCs; end (b) The property to 0+ north of tie su* ct site is in the Low - Medium Residentlai District and is aev'eloped with a mobile hone park, the property to the south of that site consists of older single family residences in tho Redium Residential District, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is Baker Avenue, !-ith single family residences beyond in the Medium Density Residential Ilist "ict. PLANNING COMISISON RESOLUTION NO. TT 14055 - MA.NESS INCUSTRIES January 11, 19$9 Page 2 11 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 2 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: -(a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c The sits is physically suitable for the type of deeel opysent g„ ,, ©sed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflipt with any easement acquired by the public a,� large, now Lf record, for access through or use of the p- .operty within the proposed subdivision. 4. finis Com. ission hereby finds and certifies that the projet,t has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Comission hea::by approves the application sebject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Tentative Tract 14055 1. Some type of interim access between the mobile home park to the northeast and Arrow Highway sndrar Baker Avenue shall be provided at all times during grading and construction of the project. Prior to occupancy, sliding gates shall be installed at the two access prints into the mobile home park and gate keys, cards or some other appropriate device shall be issued to residents of the mobile home park only. Access shall be restricted for residents of the proposed project through the mobile home park. &-a( PLANNING C"ISISON RESOLUTION MO. Tr 14055- AvANESS INDUSTRIES January 11, 1989 Pa9e 3 2. Arty walls within the proposed project which are to be greater than 6 feet in height, but 8 feet in height or less, shall require a Minor Exception prior to issuance of permits„ .;. Grading and construction shall not occur on Saturdays or Sundayx and shall not occur between the hours of 6;00 p.m. and 7.00 a.m. on weekdays. 4. Any unresolved property line conflicts shall be resolved prior to issuance of building permits. S. An in -lieu fee as contribution to We future undergroun&'ng of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the project side of Baker Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the approval o+` the Final Map. The fee shall be the full City adopted uni� amount times the length of the project frontage. a. The following reimbursements shall be paid prior to-,approval of t-;e ri;iel Uap, a. Arrow Route - For the ccnstruction of all street ip ovements along the property frontage, including the coif for undergrounding the overhead utilities; and b. Baer Avenue - For the cult mction of all street improvements along the property frosat"age. 7. Access shall be provided through this project in favor of the existing mobile home park adjacent to the northeast to the satisfaction of the mubile home park owner. The access shill be resolved and,the existing blanket easement quit claimed prior to :che issuance of any permits or approval of the Final Map, whichever occurs first. The access as on the Tentative Map is acceptable to the City. 8. In order to maintain two means of access for the existing mobile home park adjacent to the northwest, an additional driveway or emergency only access shall be provided onto Baker Avenue within the mobile home park frontage. This condition shall be waived if the access is not agreeable to the mobile home park owners. 6. The Secretary to this Commissici shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROV2D AND ADOPTF3 THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING C OMM iSISON RESOLUTION NO TT 1405 - AVANESS INDUSTRIES January 11, 1889 / Page BY:r arry T. a ai"v� R ;; ' ATTEST; _Brad Ywi i er , , secr ry I, Brad. Buller, ^,' *Cretary of the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify feat the foregoing Resolution eras duly and regularly introduced, a�ssed, and adopted by the ,Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamo. -,t4; at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January, 1M9, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CfMMIONERS: ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS: Ailk i 1 a E r SIN% �c�Ny���w�M�• �i doy�an��• qa Iris's �g V ti p4gaa y BO•w ypIb��'Jy�i. pr. '✓ �� C C 4 9� V 0 M y c N Y M Y E- L53xgt h o Itp•yp. n�v �' y � q sg6 V 15156 �� v M; t Rp INS _2- all.q .7. r+ rrO N F M r a Q� aagggga Vf� > �4 V �uw yp CpN !jY C Ma • q�Y } agtt '} Y^NZ .9�µ N � N u z_` � �,1yy� ■ S. �} f 4 y I PU r�pie�E N �w :: a Nyy �VVD A l r q» • S FBI yyY q �$xqW' 3 ++y 44a K g -y{ IS. 4 Big Rig. jig tt0 to z 1 W i i qo$= a o o «t3N�e 2l 2E .31" f �s�3 3 .�Q °� �,Nd. +� y w a . y�`�� . SZ M nb o'� wi►.N .�^ +a6c � . �a1ve� I- x su Yg i a� Y � M8 a fjpM QO �'MN M Y�L� � `i q00 y C s �t� _4 Y S�'w Iwo K +Nicw <� uL�ip �96o C ^'CiO N� w� w• CO�� w��� ^uC «"YLOp�O�Ny�� LltM fq• ~4�i �. N�� i W,+YL �a 6LNL npQL �`6b d q " 'uu� Y' Y S uO� q v Vl^. � •, �6P� ^CfY � GLTCN`�^ Yyy�CY ^ N a^�.Yr Y . y� 'r'yy3i'�i � �r� i Ng � Btu; �r I. C Y iY- rY A . b6 p � .` G C Y N Y Yl9� �� •iY � C C Y 4 +'.^ YK i' Y ` Q � yrY� . wNN O' 1iGII ^uA a �' �yY ► ....Y000OC IS .__r µAGtC!!^ -18 ^ MR 0 � � .0 Ybyy IN i C OY ,y 6 ■ K «Y01QN p c pp p D Y K ]� C YY p q M r MCN ^1. L y6 ..�`{TOLY MMw T L.N ^�• O by O CY 4 YK 6 g _ Y �e� yg.°. /��� CY �YY G 6ka- Eahim Sa� gY�ym�� `} �YN r Y�� ■ LC� V./ i 1M'ai �r Y O W4 a.'J�. lit. ^_Y ,te a$ � a � fw o�Mp Y'"+ $} ^o�py� aA ��. NNYNw•IL n$ C 4YKai y. N► cv CQ 3ga ' L• Y9� cgs yys�s�NCa��y {Lpj -.r Mfg »g n. Y M� p q B pp� aa V ^ i M i� gyy Y 8 N' qO 10 i L a�7 g• 3. ..w $ g g S $ ��. « o^ ...�yy`.a A3vY. 3� ZE a.Zmi Y•M �'6 �tyy1�4�IY �.Y m:�V ruN�PyCy Nfi N��± p$ ;» 6.tlI i► �M�i I�^YL VL ■O_N Liw'.Q. c 9 y� A^ 4 N^ ^' ► N. r Y N a Q Ll p�C N� N it G Q zz' . ill YYI M Y ® Y LygMa K Yjti SL 6 p a N U i ARK u Vfw. Y3 1i �r� '�"4j . N N�,j �'�► � � }�K ~LY �pY.�C,gq ®/ O �1 s l�piM q�'q��9�/g1`�M�,�'�M'"�o� 324.1 tl'p A V �YB�bV9i ss .8 E $y¢i y. {. yyY C q �tlO y VY De q �,Y y j� '4 6 z o. � 0 ^ 61 N � � 2.5 C ��', C �0. Ip 1� Qa d.i I W moo` rDLO >C $ at 8' v oCYnti «6oE 'Y$L I.-ag i 16 °s C C$ S S. �� -.1 4 V �^ 6� O ~9 V L C 3' L z V Y a tioq. ov .uso $c^ "c m°c��n 41 ZZ�v� .`s Ti.2.8L' .Lp pa dip TMGSO`cY qyu�'t eSc`Y a qq yu"YY�.,�.°.Fiai L�Nq b c cN L C qy iL. • t LO9, Yp`, O W .rte, Nuy�V �^ y qYN 063. wggw Ana SO-2. .C. gw -uuL.CA +$ v 1« 2 p 2= � a �a CLr pCT � x V I 6 !9-3 j « q M Y p CE .pg p' Y N OZ4 .0 NFL 9Y Hsi ~t rJ �M d1 YA A.~. 1-a Y a¢yti A O POC iw .iM9�Ntl CCN L Ca,9. wy O pTC ES, I.�o .`..^q pN Y �«w o �m y L L`�Y LN q6 ppOC `� ' �$ qty a8 T•YLU. �+F{�^ «�1 M Y M' G yyip' �O V -' I''`'`Y Y1� N� NL��� ��p NOq �C «C •- �CZ(uYL cCNCCyyI. ^aVN Yj iYN O ^\_y1 p� y4•.^t � NO { Y Y Yr� m 6 ♦v'. 4 Y ,y+ 1'� N LN L 9 Y wO¢r OCLN Cam. pp N CpJ 4q'�L vL�{i�GOy y p Y GNO C.. (� Mvy pp �qqg L'wONYq. Cp N.Y! C NCp� +i L.L L Q »L ! qo vLN A.�1G : iy11 sue. �,!Oryi .6C y. Q LC °CCL VIEN N SN <N $Np LF'MC 4NY OlY a1CMx.i Cs. E94p.N `��' Ny.i+t L' «iYV V= mss° <° . ��} + C 06 NL`0. 62 'O� i-e rES +N ZgqaCC y 1� Y Y..CE. Y.Z« ■r `Ob^¢ INS �O 4 +� HNp +%.2 p p0 Ly� LY C + C NY Y Sp « T s < C� LY «�aj�y y7i �8 �GT'Y Q� �«'"tCp s «O��M W �- �; ; �1 ��ga .3 S Q � lk L s=- Y � M N -.L c O <C A ! (I��■«�^ M{ a So yN L « ~0 +i�c�R ^ra ~Z! :-a Yy �! to . C S. �,. MC,00Q 42.0 g�N /� !=A•�Y Yom ` NO N gL 2. jai O M «� -s4 gC r .p�Yli 005 i M N a $fig�Yb jar C e4 e'd�effi < m S$ P. G-- W Ql l0 ,V 9i M 0 F-• T ^gaq -.a Y GR $ NL « O G8° 5 RE Y C L N + Y C V TO C J p ^pYY4 � O � � �. O y � i ZT � Y 01. Y ^ Y ^ • 6Y. 4 1. Pitt Y a L Y L �L } O00000� i� 02 �V M CYW � p y ^•� t' a Y Y � ��~i • V Z� pp —ell Ld .Oi r� • y Y A • dA 4 u �b �0GN N L � Y NN■■ Y a 4 � YNY Y + Z 4 YeQ3 .0 48 F F C r �. O'��pl y{1 q �pO Neu VC� ^L.0 fiW� 4�w� NNNr�Y4 YYu y C7 ■ ZH~O'. �l Y «.Y 'T},,:.ate L 4` ZE aj Hgw ^c eta Sz« e %.ioYe agw I�yy Nw yy��� zqg YaY ,�6 { ^��Y YN sYM ��w°. ^y vM�q YjLA i �� � ..N•. N iM ,['Aj •t�1 ^® gGil33' QL wNyyii. �fp�}. „JY ��yC3`F�i ��c q 4 aYpV tlN •••+ f YNM^ 6 Its!p nilY INS� iN -o ' Y g 3C ° .Y. � Z US P «e' s lit nG��. N C ey •4 pM N MY � 6� A f es w•+Ll Y '� a � to ' a O NP Q t. ify a fins 3 y y � f sYQS�/ yG Yg+6 jj.r.r 11 Ja ��' A3 N ••• 11 11 8 TAYy W'a M qM Obi N 6W �6a•• Y V 194 4g Ns e•- o ° y; L N 9 i tA C ^Yr�s� N .r 4MY 40 a «' •tQ' ® �6• �4M er {���eMCW e�,�ee 1e V•V�� v•. �m s4�6``'' I+ t]Y� � N r 713+L• �L ■P a •r • N Pi 1 �� Sig IL e �Y Maw 4 MCQ .N. •3 O o48 e/� g1t Y� ■.�r NYQNC C Tali N O+r• �Sj ° 04 NN rM0 is 4yy�. .••YM ��f L« �YQ • �� TWS ��� �YY•o O O 0 5 4 Z uN 'o �+ ,,��fYj' yypp iy,�oo • 1 � N M )vyay� Y T � �•M pL�• µ~'C � i � � G Y�p4C A g t^ �y .��N•L GOUyT� �'6 p_p • 6 tV Z•gOwS C� q0>♦ Y.q �,� g` ^+�M CY� V Yom) Y Y CCA G ^10` rt M hoop "y� r "6pV �vC .23 NW p'. N g p C i j N.^ u y. C` `. M W Y. Q 4• Y O~ c Y v1 �t 9 cY C{ v4�'i� {3¢°'c=°is{p� _^ + �• �q S $ "" Ong �vq aC1,i► V�Nr ^'i0•��i {71 � CM4�FC �c� � r� , Y :a��� O� u. r3iu Rou uo Oi+ a Ypy� ^Y$N 3.�. aa� pynC.. ;� c +,`•1�r� +� V Y 0 �O 06iS 8,0, , • e VGi Vri.M 4 sell 6.K g� ^w E3 i3 E3 9 � L VY �. s L M r w-�.• M V rS� Tk, E Cs�Y IN z a r�N i ft t �Q01i Y� it �a� iii c7 M tall; N 0 dip C diitf N P9 • C A N i'/ ! Yf r ��ga �5a: 11IL it H% a UP.S� as s~ +aN �a�ss �V^pniN� Y 4r �3 +� o 5 ss ar G gs ^iii ®A3 w Y w 21t -f - a I 32; + t wg4 C C S�o�+ OV i gQ d• q� V 0 f� r`% a a 0 2C W' ca ry� 0 N W ®f $ H N ti w I I >d-kXI AXf N N tl s IL �u �p� ssE «[Yg �M gNS Ca N� Y L N N p L Y N p V V V ra �� M g 8y i A fix &� US s p M E g. cz D i M NC C 6 � w 3 � u w O � C U L r 3as 'i ^ Y r �T 1 w� u a S � N L � I O NV4pV es c a is S9YY L L p o BIB 4 off° p VW �6M TI y O 18 fr gn ■ �� N V pp Q � �W � �« w u� w y� � w.e• p ill A..�y ta. +N ■npp n� g6 � y� ■ i�S � rN+� Sw�u N $ T N. 71 yaa/! p a8 O y f� sV`N A� NI..L N YyC W pp�� w01 CM Jz � yIL VY+ N s2k `L b Y i MV.. LY V «Y bV M its "'_z, 4 L'O EIS I N L r 1: 8:1 Q! gN h. �g� LiNC •n• LL OMB" �•� MY CwOy t5w aS L' C 4 Y 3 ^.��^ aN qY 4� CS O AH ``� p N tV� 1fYi� N` Lc.M ~.R '..� YN � •; N W ®f $ H N ti w I I >d-kXI AXf N N tl s IL �u �p� ssE «[Yg �M gNS Ca N� Y L N N p L Y N p V V V ra �� M g 8y i A fix &� US s p M E g. cz D i M NC C 6 � w 3 � u w O � C U L r 3as 'i ^ Y r �T 1 w� u a S � N L � I O NV4pV es c a is S9YY L L p o BIB 4 off° p VW �6M TI y O 18 fr gn ■ �� N V pp IFE u� w y� � w.e• p ill A..�y e Fpsw ■ it 3.9 rN+� Sw�u 4N r.R�r" T N. 71 yaa/! p a8 O C C � r . VY+ N s2k `L b Y i MV.. LY V , ff, M Ly <k7l 11 CJ �t: t Ull IR Q >� .26_ It N K Y R6/i IR� �G ws �sw >c�w Eva Svc Ai v a 3 its!y+ �D qtr+ tl y MQMN ,� NL. H{� N M r ��rp g li ♦� C9 Y+III' L�S7e HIS(�.���uu ppwZ� �,CC�14 wVII S SQi4 I^'M'b: G -3 6 i t�. i K y4 k LG�� zz- 6fw� L o �ya4 a o m a S. C a ,,6 Wes. a� � °6L4i UR �. ]1 L O M P � fw e e° w ° sm M1M1W�C&y3�G)r w ~.D !3 4 al1�tr y` x�` i» ISO n Ull IR Q >� .26_ It N K Y R6/i IR� �G ws �sw >c�w Eva Svc Ai v a 3 its!y+ �D qtr+ tl y MQMN ,� NL. H{� N M r ��rp g li ♦� C9 Y+III' L�S7e HIS(�.���uu ppwZ� �,CC�14 wVII S SQi4 I^'M'b: G -3 6 i t�. i K y4 k LG�� zz- 6fw� L o �ya4 0� UR �. a/ ck y gAI al1�tr y` x�` Ull IR Q >� .26_ It N K Y R6/i IR� �G ws �sw >c�w Eva Svc Ai v a 3 its!y+ �D qtr+ tl y MQMN ,� NL. H{� N M r ��rp g li ♦� C9 Y+III' L�S7e HIS(�.���uu ppwZ� �,CC�14 wVII S SQi4 I^'M'b: G -3 6 i t�. i REWLUTION 90. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA14ORGA PLANNING CO ISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 54055 LOCATED NORTH OF Ar.10W HIGHWAY AND EAST OF BAKER AVENUE IN THE MEQIUM RESIDEITTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE DI;STRIC T, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 20- 201.32 AND 12 A. Recitals. (Y) Avaness Industries has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 54055 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinaftor, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On January 11, 1989, the Planning Omission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THER,77ORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Cmmission herby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are trite and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on January ti, 5989, including written and oral staff resorts, this Commission hereby specifically findt as follows: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the lroposed design is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in *which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed design iP in ccmpliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Devii3opmant Code; aad 4. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or rmateria.ly injurio;ts to properties or inVrovtments in the vicinity. PLARNM C VSASWYS INDUSTR ES R0. QRT 24055 leBg January its Page 1 (' ara9reph a let 10 n subAect to each e f {ndings any` con Ttheo pp is forth in p Canditions eased uPohe hereby apPre" the attacned Standar.. 3. this Commission and in and 2 above forth below this reference' side and every condition set orated herein by and the High`ay frontagesentry shall bo attached hereto and incorporate and Art the Baker Avenue ovided on The Baker Avenu: level of detail PV aped 1. •eldvation of tha unii: at consigtent woiP9 Upgrading shall include multi -P uP4raded to eyations- zll front trim. etc. upgraded with wiwdows, fascia t be significantly t provided at entry shat . that provided be Ar row, Hi 9�ay treatueRt sin, of low planter wall ma, 2, 'The ome type ©f decorative e entry. Sow typ the Baker Avenue hzll incorporated. vantage " nat be to thr e Avenue frontage 5G�u iron' u� uritY .fie wall along the Baker instead. if desired fta h the 3 , , ee feet in neigh �ieight may be used on stu+ppI pain d traded with a feet in me wall -hall fl is and shall up9 AOL purpo,es• the existing a of the detail• +erior of exterior of and /�- .OM tYP within the in. decorative cap Baker Avenue, e second sidewalk ade�eted• High+aY 4. roject, shall be d along the Arrow the P be Provide 5. .Additional trees shall adoption frontage. Cmaission sha1l certifY to the 4. The $ecretar� to this of this Reso1 nti on • 11iH DAY or MAJARY 9 l tG9. APPR9VEo AM ADOPTED TF;YS ISSION O T" CITY OF RAC 4ucaN►�K� PIAHNIFle C� r G ATTESI' *- ra u er, cre PLP,NING ' "1;. c ..;;, SION RESOLUTION NO Dir 14001, ?V ''£SS INDUSTRIES Janvary 1 ". Pt7 a -3 � I s Et ad Buller , P,-,cra; a ry of the Pl a n" n i n C omissa.z a n of the City of Rapcho Cucamonga, do her eb,r —ortify Zh4t the foregoing Resolution was duly and iregularly introduced passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho CUCe.monga, at a1 regul,-lt- meeting of the Planning Commissio'.r held on the 11th day 1905, by he following vote -to -wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT; O N Y a a.i W OyC� fL. $SUQ Y ^.fwy OL�N!y MSL p ybL +^OO�CL N ^ oN. y' > M it - �OCY.LyC ^ °a�M..tl. yyV Y�.�0 Qu $1 a«�3 *abC+q"y ^C.«�o ,°��tT�y�i.1L all 5SyegF Y O= L a 6, {. S. V 5 M C 6 y YV. mP iia 7.V u� 01 12 C tla:D H G�� 0. � lY qYl Q C N• n q$ 4 4 p$.".a ..YSs$ 6p �� aN p C yy r• MiNC� ^qa VO wCy Mi Yq,NeC 64 YMOL S Y� V� Q N Mr�, Q gg$ K^ . N C O K} a .�.�v$yq .�,. py ei NI w a �e'i... � so s§ EA. M E g V O a t AU 2- Y a Y yTy yqy $ w N 4 a gaup S J Is x V 4 ' N $ allO Y�0 �a o.c ca ed vay e s:.y JJ E all Y^ tYu/ L +ii Y as Z's sue >,o +�s7 Su' O Ni 'u 19 a:5s^ g §X ga$`!,Q•o ^ ^ S 4 � N Y *� M �p3g�jppvapp`.� Yi'6I. �v V! YiI 1 e4�+�s °i wno ^. e� jaaM YV�iipy �0 sww 'C Y� 1y�� pi �Ynn� 09 _ Y V ttr s_ a :Y4 Yf !1 N ag= 4 V 4 $Cs..wS 4 q 4 Y ap �tici Ni��w � E�3s_ ! N I r6 co ro Or E 11 jenrj .cod leulgi,io h T y car�°g .�a y ®`Lae:°c°Swyyyyi .L°.a�a'I'% . $ €c I °iSd� goy O g Y• y, a 1 N�Q V 0 -� 6" r d "^ N Y° b tl�^ 0.3-2. Y b N C. " N Y g ° 4 q Y r Y f b o N,° "�YyStlS wQro ^y '2' Qo 00-0.9 p ^`fir 4vi L' 0 m w i �W• alr`z "'$ 5 ® ^E p Nji QAA L aS2L aS MwGVD$ 2.�$ � C; t d You'd eo$� J.i p�w!`s B^` S ^_1�� �� " �2 i -2yw °VNL �SaycYYMM: Y3Ysg�^�+ Q.y�yt a M M A N�> aa~ N L 1C {uYY� CyNn cc ry�L � Cl 'z C aA d Yop.. f. A�9 " ~! ^pyVR� yTjtlL ==uU��$ 6`OS p~ gyp v�a YraoY¢�`° CCCC�N �tl. Op. pp U� y9 pC CCOI q OK'gyM!`!`~jj����4°.Y PER YC'pI�' �� V 2 pQ�ic MM p-CC'"' «YO•� � 'ate a:.. 7P p�f. wL .' 4 oT »Tr•rC q V�L� -', `� b� ^ ^jjj a. S tic �'K i+,�wy°' w2 ° C a °NOnp 3i:��q t' .2 2 C �y Yq�. y'p =j Yii�� yq VrC N a° « � �° g i LL'M �A ^n. q 9 i le. UP pis IOW � Nd M xgr$ 11. .. ��3'�� bLlioeTYw� EMS! A A N h 6 N M r y Uit f L $YC °eu yb bYC y F_J {Muir �Y 6 p 9 .54 {� 1 O' 9YgM MY N H6 YVO 6p q ~Y� C w 60.NY F Y» t. .y •uSY Y E��Y M s.aq ra `� .~'. •r ` MIA M.= L° w �� 031 °« Ap vy $w {{{,,,, +s gsY '�v�ig O Lam. Y C. 4� 3 ! 1� h jY� 9 d «O y.'G"� ®$ C�u aS��'C OR q, «Nfyu LqS «a �tl Nu +` Y JOE—at � O aoYZ °NAtoyQg°gtQQs._ ago��s YJ9 �°i 0�t� Ci d� O at e•S wg LIN '.��. °swr'l, = i6 ]h. L j y!! N q q It CQ qp° -'- Yr ®L' Yg. �y CY 11�q �»�M Yila i> V$ � L• ' a or Y O Y 1! i0 @f p 0 w Lpa8 V Y T G c. L m, .�`w Z_ "; � w m a yy p Yy y �Q,.py 3 A A Ct I N 4� aa�rr E a a oaaos�ar *s '�q g g Hs « r� `.N ✓ ^yqOi rL r4i cjoR�db��pw.L C §��� M �.��✓ .gLA V= .�7rr, g L w O ixLOIL'L" q�oY u✓lar ear°„ y NS Y$ � y a'"-, 0 ~TA'o �o 5 Ly +Y Y• LrYN ^.� ~Y�E w S C^..6 V �RpM 1'�• {'• rC ! d N9 C6 uVC Rwb y •jl L W r:X y,& �Q! {j 3 Q 4 ` i T 9� Y C .�N qq£ N + �� 3�+ ^1. v°tl °R �yvSO • Y✓n . l N ppO Y ✓LN .y1 0Yy � a N tl Y M 5 +Ep a Jim T +« O A geeY Y M ^7ff y C ! M Q C = ay✓.. CV w�y Y ■✓ s$r Ysi Za: e-a r EW- .kmr['7 &� U-g .I a ■49CM �Qq f1yA 60 wL�Y.N "lV y^` 'G-2JSI lY +cM. 8L C L ah ! Y� E�' MN N r C✓ �OC�61Li C.NE .¢p� 01M�Y� H w✓1 pS;r c ua ��� 1 � �w w'" .�Nt L.e �s�"'.s✓. gR%avla a�✓ <Y� �ac� L e`4ttl .CUYL.QYI. EW CYCNMN OIb L rwl « E6L g 141. bi��` Hwy Eb9�w NiEAp� ®w{,1 yiyL���Op '+ ~!! ��Cy�. �✓V� Y.• M a 1 y. .C�L O YN a'4r. YNp {NyY9OOL CO. cC O +2yI C Q CpT��O RbG� 6 N L r L t N d ■ d Y M L Y w ... 6► V �Yy +�+ C��11�!! P i N�NAN 4"M� r:w 71M6 1-NS 'EN Yrr... 01>ArN¢O <ww L �Ky Y..r6M OJ Original poor Quality M of °CL Sgl Ey wig .a°1.�° =�i aa�'$ %�✓ 0 L Q� d e -25 W CI 13 pp Ie I "At r. 5lyw O C A fJl _ aR r tNRi � `- o�sle •+�' ffi g� ON cul a�ld^ ccoefa sage �® 9f +,o� bvLa2 °LV '95 �°'°G6 iai .21 p! L O L s Q EQ � Q u p M CNC ^ LC C s ! Vp Y � ay � Y Y✓ $ M iS 8 �gSa $j5 6 is .{�A aY 3 MI '� � 7S 25;0 Nap &�3 « ply�Y L AS 1 2-,— u _ Yr 4 % S r so 4 MC =Z54 rq -K8 O. '.jM = V NW V 1L p 71 JCL ~ = �V , -�j Y EM IM d qQ YAMS sw p�g�N vQ E ��tO+Q N ^NC �i R$ a Pq H ✓Y° IN~ V Nt 00^4�t✓ E°�q�i�° ✓y'2$' 3 3 Er4�Ja 29 $E�q LG ds ✓'rte. , YLY. �` y {� K! 4 �Y r..! GYY YN Cpl yLy' 9^Q� N g�gMttM v ++i L �W Nlt9 iwa6 Y 60M F�O$.c.r drOli C i LR0. a. ®MRIV� N RO F 6 N 1.1 O YI RO Y N xI > ( I I 1 4p `O Na Yn 0.v C al r ig 21 CAN u Ot ��.• -1 yv:MP_ 4.6 �gli+ddVx �Y{ M�{!tlI aVd �OVOM YYY.l Y. X*�1 � aPi wC S, u •gyp r�, w u� +0 P � +1.Y.ae Z�Cp ■qli NVM- -8-1 � .�o.,�„+� ,a,°�p M +�"y° u mow. V)wP.'E V RI 4 V ii° fly O�•. y C=�.�e� NY V C m■ C p Cy y�6 G NL^ wl'S +p .—.z .YAP a Lw 'eYN Cw WA y W m'0. a +P� a••M Yy' C 4i t yy ��pp y C yP R Y (±..°• I ~Y tYLyV- VO �F6 p ICVt ~1 iy +y1i ps+.b`y n w�iT AGO• w�T O.Y.aK� Y aN �N rFy C4 °4YmV c m_rdw a+�uy+/ g �u� _.pp� VC3 =. W M L Y °yC N Y i{yyµOp{w yc alP�� yHY� �� NN�� �j`!1 IH ye°•VM � .0 N y ai Sr EiaiK Sa. N,iw� yiao �a.V..y ap+.r.'viem $,I1 i 16 .a— NZUX l__Ak _NaQ 'ai• $ $"�N2 a 3 .w:= I "A 5. : Y ww? 33 =� Vt aW`� r a pp N� ><I 1l pi N a oginal Poor QvalitY OP L!� Cy 6 !!•O his .Y +Y ize YL0..a {YN� p Spf V�' M NccA' -��a +yp.� ~� G�} O V ,Lg Y M yY Off+' ± yMY LLb {V� V p VMR. dC. 2P N C q ,it CY 9p Hn x C 4Y 3N'o` Ms G 1 �y y s• _N 3TL sea by s6 M�.n V E-3, C 5 M err Yj ••�� ; i666�66 _L YiCT 0. �0 �. 1E1 j c C (aO O 11y.0 Q4 °spa{. 7TX. `y ■6p +• s GL CyL� MW NSpN iy Y •y°I `'�• a `, C V =v. �O� � �.`•� �i � �Hei ��{• ��..��W N^� 7*�• �dML Ye *�p C +N'S Y_yyC p,r q; N'{N, °YO�a. 1Ya !•i~ L. tp ®per• Cgy��j,4 pi V Ma tj eisglye ^�' ° "�S ywy caaraa`�d MMa^ �N.. 02, 1 `o Ny� CL� "»' V d ce4J. C7� •.6. as ND ! W C�•"4�.M •r. d 0. iYa+ SOY �i ti•.g4 OC p.� rCp� •yCOA V eB Ar Y +3 � e Y w v 1=t {�{.�' C P.g� a 0. V ,H �F �(L3{l d� Y NO Ys L' N r +�4 4.+■1 ADC �~� ~wYMN. ACbt .mar ��• s C +r <a pu N.+ V 4YW R 11M. � .Rr .�.f .~.t w ar h PI � • EV M Y v M v CJrigir►al Poor QualI JE2 +sr� c'.. i jilt a M�4� L'• yf N Y y 'c Y M eN[ O C Y. f1 O C Y' •° a C p Y e+1u� N'e N �tl i xiy x.4aY'46 7^.. Cam" C�r MY asaY�c �. s !phi za � �k' o Pay hi a m Fagg �� � L°4LS - w�p� 6 Y w�lIr LN.w e+ ' Y Is o° o P Y N 1i u a L 4 JSITL�_s a Kil Asti «�`= N�y�� iJ 4y e� � Alzi its Y Y f►Ww a+ Agi °4�J� aYpp ' �� iA `1 5-3 �� + Y � Sidi M YN � .9 - !Y p�� Oi i Yl 6�. s w 0$di Mme: V�1°►� ^Y GY X if ago °.aw �oegc u d $ all° yn M L Y G ' arY +C� p'"'p's+ ® ��on -2MLb a ~~ LTrY »° O�iiY Y a~ k Y» ° » Y n � ca ig MYCxCM d. w °1Y ppe rp ■.0 {Oy.Ye pY' °w• M_�C�••s8 YO�y p �» :r °6 � �» yw� it4+l Ms0 Y Lr L5 Np AN. �b Y '� NY��P VYAQ OD,r ■rL Y uO. oc m a s -C S A f`�8 �u : r i I II El , V rr t'bO,SY.ptl Y H! Z U. Cg i M� Y . a N��M p �N L �W�{yyMg�L',,��C�yn AcY� $ O 'w YZ Lp �pCC6 +•C �6 Lqr ew. �t� aQf N ipi �Op r' ®p aC ice. �rYwpp V�P � WCC �'C V! 6 � V M1 4r^ N�• t L Y a L q Moe f! � O� W Y w Cw C�•q1 O OI �' C 1] Y p O•yj e1 � O� Y t O U tpl O Jl io O� t �P a oY ��9i e L ♦♦y!``` Y v M v CJrigir►al Poor QualI JE2 +sr� c'.. i jilt a M�4� L'• yf N Y y 'c Y M eN[ O C Y. f1 O C Y' •° a C p Y e+1u� N'e N �tl i xiy x.4aY'46 7^.. Cam" C�r MY asaY�c �. s !phi za � �k' o Pay hi a m Fagg �� � L°4LS - w�p� 6 Y w�lIr LN.w e+ ' Y Is o° o P Y N 1i u a L 4 JSITL�_s a Kil Asti «�`= N�y�� iJ 4y e� � Alzi its Y Y f►Ww a+ Agi °4�J� aYpp ' �� iA `1 5-3 �� + Y � Sidi M YN � .9 - !Y p�� Oi i Yl 6�. s w 0$di Mme: V�1°►� ^Y GY X if ago °.aw �oegc u d $ all° yn M L Y G ' arY +C� p'"'p's+ ® ��on -2MLb a ~~ LTrY »° O�iiY Y a~ k Y» ° » Y n � ca ig MYCxCM d. w °1Y ppe rp ■.0 {Oy.Ye pY' °w• M_�C�••s8 YO�y p �» :r °6 � �» yw� it4+l Ms0 Y Lr L5 Np AN. �b Y '� NY��P VYAQ OD,r ■rL Y uO. oc m a s -C S A f`�8 �u : r i I II El V N p . L M as A W $ � OV V L 01 L a a MT L ^ o w w C y p e 7 Y � 1 C C a� Lq McY ees. of +L Y L W N �uu v`i �q"l s` F.2 Y = ■ppp N,,CC: allO cc 3 a�M Y' ■$ M��Y It ` 12 H'S i 42 -1 V O.iIM �r010Y iii In NYL C� w.id! OL. a, L, �Cfl -C G -c y■ GGC O ®C^. ^ 1 992 V 9 M LOw MCOOLc� B+ M V a 6 O qL i V 9 Sti O1b to 6eu N C 1: tu Mop dCOL CiYLT Lyl OHO �Y �p p �� OL' N q p^ yL SLyp'^C ��y ^ L gpyp Mea.V "cL • 'LO =_"gam ^fie Ham. ^^ er•� ytl Y Nv V qr N C - y + _� y y` yttV LILY ■L dO �Ni.i CC MW ■YC �+ Q��p� c�p �Vy�tl tai yiMp C.0 Q� Y~ d 0 6 Lw O`ASO a-b aN Oe`.5. iW. N9 tlLLLVLQ1r's/ W.L vVV 'NOqq I1 ys a w�� ua e�+ W ,YCq 8,0 mI 01I \I 1 `I �I O. Original Poor Quality =. V N p . L M as A W $ � OV V L 01 L a a MT L ^ o w w C y p e 7 Y � 1 C C a� Lq McY ees. of +L Y L W N �uu v`i M��. Vi � N C V M!yJ ■ppp N,,CC: allO cc 3 `M e g� gS S 3 RZy T g 4 Z Ya M w w O } O O L 6 C Y q L Wee � L V ✓� N �lxP /f�� N J 0 W l LAN Y.' �S "e L Lp C eNe 1 O e p N L G M � p T y N 1 $ L $.mayy a pC v L e G uxp ad yCd V e `g "S LO YCp•LC� Cp 4 % 1�NYW �6p NI 1 !7 d Lq McY ees. es +L " ..tc32— �n N C O Ue e T allO cc 3 a�M Yy6 ■$ M��Y It ` 12 H'S i 42 -1 V O.iIM �r010Y iii In NYL C� w.id! OL. a, L, �Cfl -C i Y 1eL d t ti O Q s sa ce � � M i VVV6� !}LLNY�� NO tl G� d �O CVN Y O�M aN atlw fig^ c �n � o .a C iginai Poor Quality -Nj�aa CwNw DO` O Y O LTA tle� YSa e O V■ G S �'S 4 N V N Y i O. Y O C .� L eL mm • yqNqy >> tl ` Cq Q � it ticN� ppnL w �•• �.�L ZL� 2�y N Le '. f St�a V4 QpL iV 9i O � N ��6 >e �wY N qL i IL p} 8! M L S O Q Y Y .5 5-5.3- a` i am VF. N qqy �a tl V tl � O aSY ="ypp Eo�V Y N i ` L {tcyR�l «M O Sagl. a3 AyQ Q w3' Y .Y 0 -° L wm .N.BN`;' Ea 3. „r,`y g N vY `� v eU �.s .a Ste. O m� N S g M 1j lit 7b w y�V �.iYa YC 2�: � "M wY fit i'N' •yy. Emu 4 � . , aim �a g L 4 L 4... C Y. O/ G y� XS 9 R' w� a �' tl ' M V O V L e lf .-V FM r4�. C yp C �m p`.pdN ppY,,� ' _® C <M NM yr �W i,s 0.Z 7i0Y. 9M2 N A: y — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIAONGA STAFF REPORT � DATE: January 11, 1989 TO: Chairmac and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: E,•ad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westr-an, Assistant :canner, SUBJECT: FNVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13930 - WINOR - A residential SUDdiViSiod Of Tsfffonfftarofly lots on 15.72 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less th;:n 2 dwellings per acre) located on the east side of Hellman Avenue at Wilson Avenue. APP: 1062- 071-1 and 13 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. I A. Action Requested: Approval of the subdivision map and the ssuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Protect Density: 1.93 dwelling units per net acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: r ing7e Fami - esildential; Very Low (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). South - Single Family Residential; Very Low (less than 2 d�,,ellinq units per acre). East - Singte Family Residential; Very Low (less than 2. dwelling units per acre). West - Vacant; Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Desi notions• project site - very North - Very Low Residential South - Very Low Residential East - Very Low Residential West - Very Low Residential E. Site Characteristics: The site has Blue gum eucalyptus windrows at e nor property line and west property line. no westerly half of the property has an existing orange grove. The site slopes from north to south at approximately 5' percent. Wilson Avenue will be extended from the east to the west property line, There is some existing chain link fencing ITEM H . PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13930 - WINBROOK DEVELOPMENT January 11, 1989 Page 2 along the north property line and some combination block wall and chain link fencing along the south property line separating existing residences. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Site Plan; the average lot size for the tract is greater than 22,500 square feet. Because Wilson Avenue bisects the proposed tract as a major arterial, lots have been oriented towards local streets without access onto Wilson Avenue. Hillside Cove is proposed to be continued north to intersect Wilson Avenue and continue north for access to future development. The street configuration promotes safe access for arterial traffic along Wilson Avenue and creates a sense of ;eighborhood through the use of cul -de -sacs at Layton Street and "A' Street. Architecture: Four floor plans and three separate architectural styles are proposed. Because of the variety proposed, the project will have more of a custom home development appearance. T; -a styles proposed are compatible with the existing homes in the area. Trails: Equestrian Trails have been provided throughout the proposal as required within the Equestrian Overlay District. A community trail is proposed along the south side of Wilson Avenue. Trey servation: The Tree Removal Permit has been submitted to Wmov%- "por� l ons of Blue gum eucalyptus windrows along the north property line and the entire windrow along the west property line. Those trees along Hellman Avenue must be removed to accommodate the ultimate widening of Hellman Avenue. In order to construct "A" Street, a portion of the northerly windrow must be removed. Those remaining sections may be retained through sensitive grading, however, there has been an issue of safety identified regarding proposed homes to the south. Blue gums are noted for easily toppling in heavy winds and dropping branches which could adversely affect the homes to the south. Replacement with a more appropriate species is recommended. Staff recommends replacement at 8 feet on center with Spotted Gum eucalyptus. This species of tree has been Uentified as being compatible with residential development: and will hslp maintain the windrow character whict is prevaler° ;:he Alta Loma area. B. Technical Review Committee: fie Committee has reviewed the „ project and requ re an a gnment rtudy for the construction of Wilson Avenue. The alignment study his been completed and Wilson Avenue will be constructed f::i 'width from Amethyst 'W Hellman. The alignment study was necessary to coordinate the �r� PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT TT 1$430 - WINBROOK DEVELOPMENT January 11, 1984 Page 3 Wilson Avenue extensien through proposed development directly to the west.: The Committee has also recommended utilities to be undergrounded and portions of the Easter Plan storm drain to be completed. C. 0asi n Review Committee: The Committee (Blakeslee, Buller, Cnitieal reviewed the project on November 17, 1488 and made the following recommendations: 1. Additional window detailing shoul.d.be provided on all sides of each house. �. The visual impact of four car garages should be mitigated through a bonus room option, stepping the garage plane, driveway 'pavement. enhancement, and the use of single and double doors on the garages. 3. houses should have varied setbacks. 4. The wall and horse trail placement along iilson Avenue should be resolved prior to Planning Commission review. The applicant was instructed to return to the Design Review Committee on the consent calendar of December 3, IgB to resolve the horse trail placement on Wilson Avenue. The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on that date and approved the trail placement on Wilson. Avenue and the wall location concept for the trails. The Design Review- Committee commented that a coordinated wall treatment should be designated for Wilson Avenue. Architectural issues for additional eindow detaining and mitigation of the visual impact of four car garages have been resolved and are reflected in the attached Exhibit V. D. Trails Committee: The Trail,c Committee originally reviewed the tract on November 16, 1486 ind again on December 21, 1988. The Committee required Oat a community trail be located on the south side of Wilson Avenue for the full length of the project. A local trail wa!; required on the north side of Wilson Avenue with "local trail links to Wilson Avenue between Lots 3 and 4 and between Lots 6 through 10. Local trials were also required between Lots 11 through 14 and on the east side of Lot 22 linking the community trail on Wilson Avenue with exiting PLANNING C0OISS1ON STAFF REPORT TT 13930,- WINBROOK DEVELOPMENT January 11, 1989 Page 4 equestrian, "easements south of Tract No. 13930. A local trail is also being repaired between Lots 15 through 20, linking the community trail on Wilson Avenue with an existing trail south of Tract No. 13930 between W.'llside Cove and Layton Street. E. Environmental Assessment: Parts 1 and 11 of the Initial Study have been completed. Two potential issues were identified. The renroval of Eucalyptus windrows -(ill have an impact on the cultural heritage of the area. However, that could be mitigated through the replacement of the windrows with Spotted Gum eucalyptus or through retention of the existing, Blue Gun eucalyptus windrow. The p:itential for agriculture use on the site has been identified however, t. ".e remov,, }7 of the existing citrus groves would be appropriate in that the area is zoned for residential development. 'therefore, staff rec ends that a Negative D� laration be issued for the devel�opme�eslt of Tract 13930. F. Public Hearing_ Katificttion: The project has been advertised in the-Daily __ epa newspaper as, ,a. public hearing. The site has been paced 'arid notificatioi.s have been sent out to property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is clonsistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The building design and the site plan together with recommended Conditions of Approval are in compliance with the Development Code and intent of the General Plan. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the design of thc.subdivision will not have detrimental affects on the environment nor: ,property. IV. REMEUBTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tract 139JO and issue a Negative Declaration through adoption of the attached Resolutions with conditions. E i_ PLANNING C". ISSiON STAFF REPORT TT 13930 - WINBROOK DEVELOPMENT January 1;1, 1989 Page 5r Res lly ted, B d B er Cit BB:CW:mlg Attachments: Exhibit .vocation Map Is Exhibit "" "bract Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit. "01 -02" Grading Plans Exhibits "E1 -EW - Elevations /Alternate Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditions for Tentative Tract Resolutiod of Approval with Conditions for Design Review ,49114A. Ij V L . 2ZKJ S.t J -I,ffANYAAI I zr Y lllel l7"Y MA Ci"' OF RANCHO ,I� C q0 y PUNNING DWISM T'rrLE.- C�� - M*Ti i 7 7,4 s 11 VOL 'NIN "Ev" flos 46 brG ti it it -94. 46 brG ')2,Ulilt L t: Ik i i � f �t Ake � r� L ;h EE- i- ` P awr n r I V � J e 1 i I V � J e G 1 /1 t (. lam. k �i i r SM g� ,;Jea 161 a its 1 "s t j� i, U� J� � tx6CL 1.�MtS1. �AILtl.!!�1 .. • t 1 i a � 1 F^ -3t Y n 1�e 111, — — f -- — •�► : I . � �. : r` � "' ( is •i�: FWTV EM ,y t% CA • _ ��0 is �' i . a- ' ��`t.•,' q w'Y. 1 •. I f.a7 1 � I Lila - .• '. �'� '. I _�� � � } ?• t ,,%! ':� r' i.�a et. I viii$ ; - --•: -t a ?+ ;' ,• ;.! 1 +� , t • 1 � � �a a a: 1 a. q r • Fx�t , �i?N . _ '.'.J rA .1 k - �e a 9 NO[LMN77+7 i Mff�d. as�sr° Q!^JiSB� 'ata�ti .slts! ff��4� . #@E1 LE Q if 1 Y` / I' WFT41 ; E-. ♦ r.r —t f ]f6 1 Wf,L-,,4!4 ,njk� 1p �lm ROW - I -, 1"Milm C" Imll "i:t milu- } 8 sis ar �� i�Ki 1I' I 11 NCB ! 4vw f m. 1 r» �� irra tuna 1Y t, i i =.bi1f _ t= e =af 1Y t, i i on v v iTim i W u 1 Kt_.�.�r'SE11 t tT_wMN#i.�49 wr✓d.L 4s� i W u 1 Kt_.�.�r'SE11 t N i�� I 1 s� � � x I j L e { ■ "UVAXU .# ■V14 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C'I MISSIOh OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13930 LOCATED EAST OF HELLMAN AND NORTH OF NANZANITA IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENT!AL DISTRICT, AND Pl4KI.NG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN; 1062 -071 -1 AND 13 A. Recitals. M Winbrook Development has filed an applizatirn for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13930 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map rec4,.t is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 12th of January, 1989 the Pla,ising Comnission of the City -of Rarrho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the applica` ion avid concluded said hearing on that date_ (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution,. ROW, 7HEREF(MV, it is hereby fotmd, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1. This Commission haroby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part n, of Luis Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during thq above- referenced public hearing cn January 11, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, tagether with public testimony, this Commission hereby specificall, fimyds as fOIIGWs; (a) The application applies to property located at Holtman Avenue north of Manzanita and east of Amethyst; and (b) The property to th,e north of the subject site '�s single family development, the property to the south of that site consists of single family development, the property to trio east is singe family devolopmaent, and the property to the west is 4acznt. (c) The site containo at citrus grove and windrows at thb north and west property "e ner id) The topography of the site make it suitable for residential development. PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13930 - WINBROOEi DEi+ELOPMENT January 11, 1989 Page 2 3. Based ;upon tae substantial evidence presented r�,) this Commission during the above- referenced public hva•ing and upon tha specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above; this Commission hereby finds anii concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent; with the General Plan, Development Code, acid specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the Genpral Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is phys'cally suitable for the type of developmsnt propc ?ed; and (d) The design of the s0diuision Is not likely to cattse - edbstantial environtmntai damage and avoidable 401iry to humans and wildlife or %aei� habitat; dnd (p) The tentative tract is not likely tc= ceuse serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the oublic at large, now of record, for access chrough or use of' the property within the proposed subdivisim. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upoi the findings and ;onclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission " reby approves; the application subject to each and every condition set forth beloh and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto a,nd incorporated herein by this reference. Tentative Tract 13930 — 1 1. The existfng ov;4rhead utilities (telecommunications and electrt:al on the project side of Hellman Avenue shall be undergrtunded along ttt,? entire projvst: frontage extending to the first pole off -site north and south of the Project bounds -Wies, prior tc public imprrvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. PLANNING CAMISSION kMLUTIOti NO. TT 13930 - WINBROOK DEVELOPMENT January 11, 1959 Page 3 2. Sidewalks shall be constructed on one side of the foilcwing streets: a. North side of Nilson Avenlae, b. West side of Hijt'de Avenue, and I c. South side of "A" Street. 3. The parkway landscaping and trail fence on Wilson Avenue shall be designed to provide a 50 mph site distilnce at the intersections as approved by the City Enginj�er. 1 4. The lots on the north side of Wilson AvenuL shall be drained by individual yard &ain parkway culvart systems discharging into Wilson Avenue. 5. Install -the missing portions of city Master Plan Storm Drain Line 3 -E within Wilson Avenue fron Raretn;Esd Avenue to Aita Loma Channel to the east including sufficieht catch basin capacity at the Amethyst /Wilson intersection as justified by a final drainage study approved by the City Engineer. iiee cost of the facility shall be eligible for fee credits and reirbursements in accorda,tce with the City Storm Drain Master Plan policy. 6.- Vilson Avenue off -site improvements: a. Construct full width street improvements Including pz kways fro;- the project to Amethyst Avenue. b. Reconstruct the PaethystlWilsor Avenue intersection to include but iiot limited to: (1) Curb returns on the west side, 1 (2) Removal of the cross :utficr one the oast side including curb return ivplatce•,mnt as necessary, and (3) Reconstrution of the pavement -is r4cessary. e. These improveoents are eligible for fee credit arni I rsiOursement from the Cityr sy5 -ams development fund it approved by the City Couxil. If not tsl.?rrov6d by rNe City Council, this entir° condition shall be waived. 7. Asa Alljpwnt, Study for the portion's of Wilma Aventie frota' the l �,xis.ting portion's truest of Beryl Street t® Awthyst Avenue bused upon a field survey shall be provided upon submittal of the final map and improvement plant, tpr City review. OL ii f,. PLAr1NING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13930 - WINBROOK DEVELOPMENT January 11, 1989 Page 4 8 • The driveways on corner Lots S and 10 shall be looted as far from the intersection as possible to reduce conflicts with traffic turning right. The driveway on Lot 10 shall be designed to discourage backing onto 'Hellman Avenue. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED RED ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 1989. PLANNING CQ?MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. W.11i e , Chairman ATTEST: ° —�Brai Buller, secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission elie City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comn+issiofi held on the 11th day of January 1989, by the following vita -to -wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: WES: COMMISSION €RS: ABSEP'T: COMMISSIONERS: !i ,y.�°e`ouiiw> ,HFO +9w wL�.�.'�'. Hsi man sa. uji f3 ANN {�..'po�Mtt�VYY y ^VYG Jwp; YQyy�� ��6 NCCs� 4.q 4�.�.CCCp T9 Z. �'^ °fin 6YVfn. '� OY�Y L� VC�11.> S $4 s .^aOL'vY s �A LUS C Fei 7LO EyY. V q°lhN � ^'.. Kip C O � -^ 2 yy N = y YRYC N Vv IY M o N C 4 Y H � 4� g vv-�y 0+� O+-a 1T, a 6i O '194M 3.1 ;; a MH v33GG��g >��M� y$ {j L����9 zitz-3 Z, .1flam i.`ii� oI.z ti�K K^ �e OH4l.Y3 EMUNFES ti6 C �336{q�^ �Y . qK uYi ~R Oa -fie �J T Y i9N� fm. Y m w w n yy; w W n A .I u c at w J� S7 WN H pu, r r N y 4 l N Y `Je t M V � MN � Y y p V gg �. 0.� us TL aPHi�JM '9y pN V lk" v Y V+ p y� i �sYG. �iQ O��Qaq M iY :C ^'rU N J iLS W 4 y i IN . 112 'I �I �a R 5i O w Original Pour Quality 'r. u.1-S 2 : pa �f S.-Ol.-v .8 M��yjpS... Lea �Z +Sy'aNta = =a Y '0 a pyMO VQNs O °pA ryYyVC YLM r�� Yar YM F ssO pYy% 4`a Qyy �r�uG E"Saw � yqO°� f e ■�.�q -33w zz i!E il�$ r+n4..Y � �` °�s = �r :da � P is�av iii. 06 x SL y,aia g oN 2541- tLL� eNc �915y « !r coee"L' r oc>v c yfN.00 EIR —K s�wy�b F.NMN ~RL4yi �` + y'C Y.°. 4� 22 ypNu y�yyy+^»a.Ky ipnk tmeaiyyYY�,33. u a .^ V YV po� Mi��■rH L N�wgM 9` 0.w &M� +�} ■YY �c _ qp »11 r� M ¢pp Ett�ll ap�Q L'O VIE 110i ;o r +�'r YaL at w J_j'N Li v ao t`cra. w€LYre �+ rfSYL .°" E ��h "d Yi a &I ya ;r ;saawSIT, r -Si 6i iGws.O vf+1i 6 H VVV �w ���aIIIQ YiMMMy tlOf.bO i�, i_s wqs��F Fmy�1� «e z_ H C 6 M R all �Y1a�i C wa .i bj3 mC w� ~ pfit! �4!'~ �� P ^.4Y �!liyYy NANO «b fyy7wy ' � L ��Y' N ibis q"YQY8 $icc- �6C YQQA ~y1�'Y° Py sNVY��Z¢����� N{•�_yy`i� ytil �j�y. 6pEp 7' �y fd yYy 3— arTi�q y�p�CTL tAw µg - J4 l..p�CCs. 11{3 1. a� Na ! ;Nli! }LCD 2a K$ ^ 6$l66 01CNa : �N ZT z mi /QL �!$q! (��N,YC Q je �r�Y► i4E Lv n C i' ' .in ��'3qq ., L�� +azi ,(°QO�M,i. VI O +i CwO \ yq I.N w�i., yw. ^l��111 w V psi C. YYY �E ,rp {a A�_Ji N'+ 'lOi aip yO�1N W lwriY��r.3 ■ 1 ,qty, � V s M e! lyq(, M N IY p N 3 y 19 1L ' ii iJyy&y�1t( p LMML ' JY s1�M L�RC YEV �� ^CYN9w�lYV O�tI >N.� �. LQQ L� a .ri°.�s.`s°aN� rsNO s. -wit' w'iii R4 �aS�$v• �.-w ��JdNQy ih.��an.+ oi+pm{�a1'o T'� oco+�.:�iew i{°t .°. '.i ra a LY . Z C G p TqqT �{yyyy+f ( Y IKLac Wes. V ~C1 Ny NCO �Ci �4m'YCL Cf.. 9> YG� /cL a 1 �VnN `0 0 u°.SNy8 u$y Vu a Nc 9 4 O yV, E y NMI V ,'_�� �. YU Oyu .`��.. �.d�pi�N,... `o tY 3a a/p c y ^y T'!Y ■I is _J M�� �� fL�{LyO Y' • «Nh -I�.�Y -.r 9 wV «Ty COI 6{{���- ^•�d qY{Y y ^O_K MrZTa a. UIUCM YVC1 76 VdY qr.C. YQpY`NNY D.Y Vttalq ^ NVEO �gyepO :`a Z e id S__ a � a o at � 2 .5 g ga' Soa ~s _ 's lQ ��•'• V9r-N L IN q• YY'^V�NMpG Minty ■{� NVy w8sIyN :NV4 MLa� GNN1 ^('f� yp F L`YL- p0Nd~O1b m" gL,Yi 9 9° o +V d �Gy ~IVY �y� d ✓Q��:O= .r[ 6C +NA {yam `5:1 uyNY G ^(.d �di CaT a�y� CrY N.M�6 L'��L dC�/L .Cj�C{a,N gL O���N yy ttli a�1cNf �dy�L ^yN ^Y �q t9�� yGd�M >+'��JG p�� Vd' V" {H� `ar 6� fYp1 {Mph {gi.!o s lava. y 12 LNLyV fil NL eNN L ^GGYlq�L ^6yy`CLM F. Zvi f �- N L tV Y^ LOa A�1C 'OG aV + 3yCd T C � 7$p91j4�NYlM V �.Crrt• ! a 1, a N^e N y N i L . //Y��G�L pp liiiylll a YyCfG 4J C.+ L iG p ' tt NL.,Cy' �Cd _C6 N 8 48+M^N A bCM iq w�r. + � q i � �'•� y IL 41 Y« P V � �~ •^ ^ � N� N J�. iC Nr�G N� - Pyte' VVy ENV~. w� O Y �o M�gC�4 Sw o es_•' ay „�' ., q to Y Yoy� }�! Mc a O a Cyl ; L. C tlsa $ y «MT ~3pYn � �� • S�P q 6w OP�� A� q0 O aa�6c ey. 'a c G' YC • y ±y wio C OI VMV VqN =NN iLdC� �� 1 NrL ETC ti ✓w0 pYM+ ; ^.0 ]N. yVy OIj3LM �6 N~ eNS•O~ ,y�.� Ytl Yyi'CC tpipy�0� Y.r xO Cidd N} 'tic, i(c+ �qy �10w Y�y CN PLO6 i. �i �- Ndytly�N N O {V'Odd ad "p. •dII1e yEz Gd[ai y +0 Y a�v 4VN f�ON +2. GJ <4CNIp� 6'O 6sra.�. tiJ•LYG�VI.ai� A e MI• 0 L]d f s W d Original Poor Quality J�y'«Y w�ta anpL �� w V Y u M •aVr a f cc L Base V �y d L Y CV yy w w C ti N V e ze d3S N N` ♦ Jypt W ej L :VN 0 V at Zao% Oq0 VCS toquY b0 pYY µ4u �a t avw, yeatE�LGz. L8 o `� �vv y w su` Na >yr �n..... s 9L15—� .rjQV Y€ Er ,^gym NaL+� uyy'Jtt � Yy� G M .� R N U,^ Y 1prCJ it y^ N=YiM ( b�2 C• YY V V► N !1 •1 L C ��y~ L {pV� 4-im 2 a Y�w ^ ^ N �LNJA �wrwy C r � w bMCbyYg.. .Y `" v Vb 2 w n E �r s1 �x po V Vs MR] e� q� �y .(� LV � Q N e� 4-p p gad s Eywe Ey da M f3�a N` — • O 4^ • e !➢ 0 Eft No b _Vi a,g 0 iV6 4N i�w lup'.s r� ww it w V Y u M •aVr a f cc L Y V �y d L Y CV yy w w C ti N V e •� d3S N N` ♦ Jypt W ej L :VN 0 V at Zao% b0 pYY tirr ^4N "v- �qV L8 o `� �vv -ur N � 1L C L f(pJ7� N OFCis Y « �N a$ua ( b�2 C• YY V 4 N Y !1 •1 L C ��y~ L {pV� r y� 1Y O.RP r G a aC ^ rYYVP A NHS Nlycj 2 " ~ a—vV OVY �L 4�oY MYY` Y'tl a CNC Y awaus jaj '/1 N N e V bYY Y b a c 4-im 2 a Y�w ^ ^ N �LNJA �wrwy C r � w bMCbyYg.. .Y `" v Vb 2 w n E �r s1 �x po V Vs MR] e� q� �y .(� LV � Q N e� 4-p p gad s Eywe Ey da M f3�a N` — • O 4^ • e !➢ 0 Eft No b _Vi a,g 0 iV6 4N i�w lup'.s r� ww it w V Y u M •aVr a cc L Y V �y d L Y d3S ej L ew. toa at Zao% b0 pYY tirr ^4N "v- �qV L8 o `� �vv -ur N � 1L C L f(pJ7� N OFCis Y El E V * Q i 16 ✓ N h L d « q u� n �Oi L _.g0O zZ r] x n Cy pp 'l� vat uu M.A EYA W tiC� el S�O�@@.. s.� ��Y'Y 1Y V Q � u w � N ■ OM � C dp �'IY.A d «�.0 tl1 N�Yy}j�•9 uiy ergo+ a °j °c'3�= '•f w § ,« 3 :! A $ Ww a +� '�� d+^ +-air« �`�.. 3� ' iiSS►- �`.: � 4 + `�yVl +`�i 833:5 ycu�o`t4iq E {°O`25Ct� �1A+•r4i 1 i}+ s�9V Z 4 4OwW Mjp tl Q !! QL M . Is aka :�� ;5 at si raj y! I y■ + _ 4 > Yd. 9� a~ hliyL �i 54 AS Ny + y1Y ^ 4+ ci « a�i �+ Now ' xRe d t aa, �:gwa$sc +"�`s m gig ,.r �u •" c epYs $ IT. ga:agi 9ZEV 7� ��3 �y ie Ca «Y YY4�tN tl« N rt•e'�.. tl d V VA i3O�Q iO+n ;pY y. NC N46T �cJi t'+�„i= Nfi j�! g Y V 0 o n W 2i 0701 -02 01- 11-89 PC Agenda 0 3 of Original Foot Quality .CV YZ^ VY y &C �•� yq�V `s q YR'aY YCN szo N -,k y. N p F fm a �i L r pM GL b. i � p 4 ss}r u ti `"` �a ��rj. a � t3 x �y.�@a � x w �uy•u c �'• q i« Gi = w N� L� y Y Q � V: N� V �✓ N � Q M M � � M a ~ O CC*3 °q ""' orn& 7s ��a a S gat w� N~ saQO C•�'bi p�..M1M AGl uT W Y. {i O1N CN Y.q V NQ �G g k Ij AgN,C�•• uLL �Lp16� YY CA O,CU.y r`A G^p'T 01 t�My 0.Mb CLVY .0 01C +3y�NeM � � � a •T f.� r►p 6.LM i`m, 4CM� �iJ �L� L Nb yYAY A .5C 3=. y4. U O Y.mZA paS spa 2 "soa. � .'0. L�aa�° i.". °vw r-w ii0•S.N »�V A'WN �n �4 �ioS w YrcL k.':�fr <u n°r LSrai" 'ia it a3v •em �'+i ,�. I�Ai +rtaN m ee Y ..7 e+i as X11 a wZ `aa '�ia o aia 5F tros.�y� �if�'w CJ' TEA id w L viiY M y +V wr� Y�MC ,a��{L�64N CCi F. ,fp1�i/ TY N'4 Owl �M i7 g1 ,per 7�i w 1A 0 ppQ �MaapfEE yT{ f `gL ti� Y®M LYE 4% w6 Its owe •L� Yyq 'p^•$�Oi yS'yq•D@ a1A iX icy eSfN W� o ° � AA +r yR w.•V. � Y � m ee Y ..7 e+i as X11 a wZ `aa '�ia o aia 5F tros.�y� �if�'w CJ' TEA ~ viiY +'��UU °•mot t o y +V wr� Y�MC ,a��{L�64N CCi F. ,fp1�i/ 1 iiiYkkk i � Vw i7 g1 ,per HE � y w - y L E - aq w' f w6 owe •L� Yyq 'p^•$�Oi yS'yq•D@ a1A iX icy .yuL�V 3 � w z t''�a a wZ `aa '�ia o aia 5F tros.�y� �if�'w CJ' TEA ~ viiY +'��UU °•mot t o y +V wr� Y�MC ,a��{L�64N CCi F. ,fp1�i/ M iiiYkkk i � Vw i7 g1 ,per HE � y w - y L E - aq w' w6 owe •L� Yyq 'p^•$�Oi yS'yq•D@ a1A iX icy .yuL�V 3 � w z -RI w W CS. wl FA 3 L Y LY O y l.�O. tl1 M �W 6 ° �v Qy ran w c 9 H N' O c9 Tf u� 0 o y? Yoi Y x$48 OC 9 O o�.+ u if J L $ u a� y `o p V W 3� L. O t:Y ° ea: �Y .. h NL a «° M w Y $�5 �j �LY N L Y a Y P ° v Y V n.y L• y �pt 69 � 1f 6 OeY y p7� y aM.yM� C.0 L_C AO V r, s 4i uY �N°L 0 ed V yyi N L` i N Y «$ r Z C:i 4 V � e Y+• � L Ada„ do a °x _ p3� �w� u Y � p ra� S Ne �-• Y o 20 c IJ 1.2 4$ rr! r s sY1 ,yg r oti� s Y M u Lau ia z y'wN� P .�. oaa Y G+yyq NY -5O V 4 � S B 9 6 V r l <` r AT Ci 4Q ¢ �2 A3 u s�8� C m p Y N rg o c o'�t W O C i HW �gg Q YMa NP ��1Cri O Y Y LL' $ ��� Y �� -H `C'r o 6JVA iCaW Fc+wn { { I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13930 LOGAT 9 EAST OF HELLMAN AND NORTH OF MANZANiTA IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 1062- 071 -1 AND 13 A. Recitals. M Winbrook Development has filed an application for the Design Review approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13930 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 11th of January, 1989 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly Poticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commisison hereby soecificaliy finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantia4 evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on January 11, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as fellows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objective of the development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING C%JMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DRTT 13930 - WINBROOK DEVELOPMENT January 11, 1989 Page 2 qP 3. Based upon lie findings and conclusions set forte in paragraphs 1 and 2 abz)ve, this Commission herebv approves the application sutdect to each and every crndition set forth below and in the attached Standar3 Conditiops attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Design Review 1. A decorative, wall and cap shall b,2 provided along Wilson Avenue. The design and materials of the wall along Wilson Avenue shall 6o reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuary a of building permits. 2. A Final Noise Study shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits in a standard format as determined by the City Kanner. Said report shall discuss the level of anterior noise attenuation, the building 'materials and construction techniques provided, aid if appropriate, verify the adequacy of mitigation measures included in the building plans. 3. The existing Eucalyptus windrows shall bl, remoe ^d and replaced j With Spotted Cr+ +m Eucalyptus trees, minimum 15- gallon, eight (8) feet on center and properly staked. 4. The Secretary to tnis Commission shall cr,rtify the adoption of this Pesolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. WER151 , ChaiiiUi ATTEST: ra u er, ecre ry Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby c ^*,ify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, panszd, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the j City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January 1989, by the following vote -to -wit; t r PLANNING COWISSION RESLUTION 90. DRti 13930 WIMPROCK DEVELOPMENT January ll:, 1985 Page 3 AXES; MISSIONERS: ROES: WMAISSIONERS: ABSIENT: COMMISSIONERS: �I V W d b=. `3ruorra�s C'Op qd� :�`"����yyyy{{{{^�r O�OYy A ++wYPJN » +OraJL •GIC� 6 ± • ®9 Y •O `�.L00 rLkse _ag e E r °ios ®Y M O �i y. � M CYO L � • O. !t 0 V r y i� �O O .i y iii c3 ^o r.- iie$ i 4.ew ���.nq. r`u om�uZ' + ~O�OkjI C Ye'j � •y�ql LV «.q.4M C YMA. jZ CY�R lL+'G 'y rs�y 4OYC �'i9O ap6M a op y y u ti 4 14O���O�O +,Y LLL oO MO �sV,'iLpi S✓ CqJ i �e� I frl '� w ISMNM Y�l Nyg6z OY cc_C jPy�j�- r*5 CY $r .un NO 6r LY MM O2SOQ YyO+y� �L�p3 may•& �Y�L i �z4 � i yyV ij. i YY } y r,. �.V I ^'Y�p o° MM i " C iCp 9 e z Y •� UP a � .•i'� �� Msqu a; �0.3 �� ��M8i��sv � N O I b w• f d hR : . • py A3a y . +jguRS$3 J N PI O 1!1 4 co CY L. lao oC 0 QO 4 Q a N W �J�� �g �3 Y >aOP�tlYY 13 9 LM �y Y �N �30i b YYrYa ' C v Olb e rf Y i w p K N 0 wu a up�o�� ^ � t gyp P ...� ^6N CAL `^L ♦' ONS� Y.� ►C^ q�Qp �r� `go_ro^� yg y� €wgti N y 6 Y Y 9 N N^ C w 4 a.a �� x'� �wra ✓�sT qa � 4NgrC ll. N�'O'yr` -N ��9C �E�aq ��Yr' i�•Si�� ®` C C� �Y L.�.- •Mi��Nl�6 ii ..II�1II1 L a»a IEZL Hi[ six % >iaa i y r 0^ Y Y N b T ]• p 41 u `fi pY�M�YUy yI W -Yc .Y1j. W.Q~ �C YCN.'iyJS Y_�� �� cY @Y O V1 _ Y Y> N� PI �� JI 1 N 1 Origins! !po r_Quaf't, Trig td - is �3 ry4s sa gsYLLc TL j- THU 1-3 Bill Y Flo 1 0 1 * M `�!r' _ p _ W pe . �L^T� ``O.P l��l �a Ir TY� �' figONy. L 4 {� i Y O ~ dibIr�aY -& iz ]z lsl� Lea 3.21 'Ulf, Y C O H 138i vial = E7 6 Y.J� a � � w� 9g4$ Im- Sr�1®. zr.-GIs 444 t 'w19,`?IYlt.ve —L cct � :�fr '1O'yv.l`d °w ^Y aawE �Y`a+N��B� LLJ M7gwy �OL1' N M 4�. �w� � yYY.�,I.r.�.6 (VY ¢ •G —Y CC. A�a°��n N�1a i i. gad 07w.0 L�C O ^gIC iy �fi 60$ LLO Ls M91 -83 $, Lo '�'ig•ct� ii� .'YYi. ++.' tea, o. ^.°o...�Y+cc��uoo'•��1s9 c�cu C N V� p > >- O 1 i «•�1 Y � Q Y y L YYYL- O Y d6N C� ^.i� ) � g�Gi� �oY N Ykg; 3 y N MP -M M IwTN �s �Q= -E5��{�i�° W w0lO pL L i 7N0 H d MCN y`^ $ t gg IN G ga s-iE�sN . A S .2 -Z Me Y�i .�`w - �� YYIM N ^ �y Z�. i°i� �I.YnW• ��.���_ S Y = w- � 9G /c�V CEO` yl ��Iy -O � S�yVf �� � �1� 6 +'i � °Y1. '1�j� l+` tv p L LV Iasi jai Oi e Y yr- Y i �eM1A » uaT. yM fyY. sY` 6a g� N� 0��p•p60 ` .ri t:,, wM Y+�— ks pYYO py Ybbqb a� ! - Y.j y,w O�°:+ -" t° O ill Yl Qi -1 y3 ' xi w;sLLa gsrp`o SI Y aN..KU.1: ` 111 $e YY ee N . r o N 6ii I'd a N- +to KJSTL t'SL' '151-2 y Ir Y' 0 � -hfl. L of 1 L_ U a Original Poor Quality �.Cy►5 �naisa � go yy yy yy V{p^ V pN ��OV 4yVyY r.0 u4q'NO W WC O�.ppNy SIN aiv �Mw sNiN« c o» w a s s 4`` 52. G W G W L L A G a 0 Y w 1V. p�'7Wy0 SA CA It= `i u F 4 yp W : Y i Y C -oil c MM =�}* Ike QYwD rsl��` Ny ww f 4m.w. i s p M Mp yy� O Q C W 6Y 1 N V �w F33� o Ede r a I( }1( YC �1 L Y WC POL �'Y • $_ q_. it ON�iq,. y V 6.Ww. Y zs! Yr y}i V stir F Q °5: Ali is j w � Y PoM f R 1 ap CK r G1 4ACs y 1r l��y Y Y Mew MMO ` MMI�i p cK tcV c Y M M Mw L W p RM its I�:,A V.'KI w e ar ,+lV ■� .vt M'CetiR ZU M ;ES _'5 N. r: Y C �p Z g Y � _ L y2Ci V`C e r ��u a c i'i y ciC '°' gipp• aLaw� K £ q Z-4= 999 p6p 4 y! p,� Or� � V 5 S4i $ate C� OY - ~ jig f �WSN. AyT NjyGfY O V set y s,G ■■ u �QjA N�CC M�` LLt;O Gp ySW$ MCI ` r N.V^ yfi� i•• yN Lw Y e A dtYW �` L Y G a Ai O� qio _N Q'tt M -PAUU p`g fN3 r LouB m5 i E= s� . is'. �.Cy►5 �naisa � go yy yy yy V{p^ V pN ��OV 4yVyY r.0 u4q'NO W WC O�.ppNy SIN aiv �Mw sNiN« c o» w a s s 4`` 52. G W G W L L A G a 0 Y w 1V. p�'7Wy0 SA CA It= `i u F 4 yp W : Y i Y C -oil c MM =�}* Ike QYwD rsl��` Ny ww f 4m.w. i s p M Mp yy� O Q C W 6Y 1 N V �w F33� o Ede r a I( }1( YC �1 L Y WC POL �'Y • $_ q_. it ON�iq,. y V 6.Ww. Y zs! Yr y}i V stir F Q °5: Ali is j w � Y PoM f R 1 ap CK r G1 4ACs y 1r l��y Y Y Mew MMO ` MMI�i p cK tcV c Y M M Mw L W p RM its I�:,A V.'KI w e ar ,+lV ■� .vt M'CetiR ZU M ;ES _'5 N. r: Y C �p Z g Y � µ Ell $ate - ~ V� �y �y p LLL YqY qX g L Vv.W 3w MCI ` V tE t�c� 1F � LouB ca 1 11 M 3 y 3 ES zis 3 i� yy=1 V'. VwD ��N CY yaM Y J Af+ L 4r .rm L'CP4� �iw L ° aiNn it !�, `ii Y�� V Nw H�nYLjt b'.$N �R p � a b,� V� Y O r x tA^ 4 ,�1 A V ~ YCV Q D Of D,{1{! tQyl Y }y. T9 �C ryayi � « - M •3 � L _.- O. Ca* ati Q ° OfC (;ip �J��Mw7 Ira »1/f ^Mc�GY � _y cp Yy t4 4 Ka WPB � � uY ��Ud �� �P 1g. [!� �cfNy� Ii�a ��ExE�yy MM ��4�N w7 ■s r• Y{A 2 S] �i ills 13f b!jj:' sill j;g g:1 r 1 it His vlau �.. �.MIL w moo. $ '¢Ns w4 is Who a S A an tp N yp �N r p C4�.{{ �►�yY` 4Qy'i��. C f. �b. �C(? M7g1sy M4^ it0 L� ~w yy. _i A�� ^ • f.�c s:KQi'n qA 1. 4x K w 4 Y 4 I `� '41 11�0 M F? �p�ty Iu'n is a� Q uj N.9 I Ia. Original Poor Quality NO92. Y'iCiCCCN t� `Cq`Lyy pew atSi� L A �u�� 4Y IJ Y �QC� �Q G�C� CyOL^ Vq G yCC .3t!.. Y1 A CO j Z. CIE - ��OLp CC///p� LgyyL p� gL ���4 ySl �OG ` m� ` ^.Y VO • ^W 'O� _iY M� M^ � �O.q CN� a ��Cp �tl YL �4y9ipgL i�V ^YI \19 �YN �Yp� Li 3 ^W YC N� VY0EM 4a0_� ! y V Qi1. M pp Y 6 N Y M E--ww. QN�Mj ya a ��yC LYC E OgI�YOi �O 9Ltl GGY SpL LL V7 ^Y >, �N.`u. Y!YVVJJJ ®t6 {q`. lf0 e� �yy C tMOYC �6 LY NONM.wr NO �\� ^V:H aw WV N`L1� y V <\ : �V j�NYW �C ®N YN C L Y 6 C AW 3 $� Y Z X g P� Sri yob C C Y i $ a' A N` �yL C b s V L M N O 6y E■ N jtsi; �N "l ai � u ss �� o M O g 8z ilk 13 pia s s o *a g \ L Y if s 4Ly �� N Y 9 tp gm R.-I ■ ��`` � L ° Y a 9�.w a�a T .r all 25- log SIB .. \ by a = w L «I!� ss \ 24A O .yP V kiz I\ NIS ,D 11 x W R1 Y M L " O y o; off. Y H° $a° �3 vH 3g C G O w LPL M YM Y ° " � b V " Cd° G^ Y w T ° L =as C V H E � 7 o RL Y �y N h� V ♦i SI .Igo 4 YY Cy ��Hy u I " fill d XY „g8 c �lz kA 41 2 I+ aIrgf KH . My- Z, e2 I Z3^ 3 33� L ,ya ADM F. " TIE s M M� i� «3 2 Ali1 M ir e , v1 s ii,.�. < i Ori.oinal Poor Quality a'^- a V V W$ C g 3 � o 1g3� M w ss L O 4s6 a � Y� s� u L SO =r M XS Y N y G l @Q•Y y t, -, ra vv LLL � 1 jAw'TMN ` �y V � A.d � iO4L � Ma vN7 _LL e6g n a'^- a V V W$ C Y a V p 1g3� M ss L O a � u SO ISO vv �p. Y jAw'TMN 1 _ D � A.d � iO4L � Ma �i 4I 'A DATE: T0: FRONT: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1ViONOA STAFF REPORT January 11, 1989 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission. Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Betty Miller, Assistant Civil Engineer Ft 9-cfAi- A 4uua1r151V11 yr i.vs acres yr IdIlU MW t parcel ror- .ondominium purpsses in the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 3, located at the northwest corner of Feron Boulevard and Nelms Avenue (APR 209 - 031-57) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIOt1: A. �Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown on Ex-hfbiff "B" B. Parcel Size: 1.81 acres C. Existing Zoning: General Industrial D. Surrounding Land Use: Borth - Industrial South - Industrial East - Industrial and Vacant West - Industrial E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designaticr►s; North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial F. Site Characteristics: Construction of two industrial buildings on parcel is nearing completion. The balance of the site is a paved parking lot. ITEM} I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12057 JANUARY 11, 1989 PAGE E II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this Parcel Map is to add the designation "for co nd%7nuim purposes to an existing Industrial parcel. The public streets adjacent to this parcel are already improved. Additional parkway Improvements, which were Conditions of approval for DR 87 -30 on the site,, are under construction. The Parcel Map is subject to the sauce Conditions o1 Approval as the Development Review. III. ENVIRONMENTALL REVIEW: the applicant completed Port, I of the Initial study. a con acted a field investigation and completed Pa'. *t IT of the Initial Study. No adverse imp4cts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. rn► refaoe, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding proper owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Plan .qirg Commission consider all npu — and elements of the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Commission tan recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, A lk Earrye R. Manson Senior Civil Engineer $RH:SM:Ty Attachments.* Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A ") Tentative Map (Exhibit 1',8K) Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval 11 lu- ( E J I E asgrf �.� ISP i N MY OF rrL Pr "ICEL MAP 1 s'7 ffiNd'xW1�'Fa MG DMAO ON � I Lo 3 � Z9rfsa.erratnf GH1ar • �' Parcel n�. � ] �.f.�:..� MCA" CrFY OF a PARUL MAP 120 7 RANCHO CUC c0NGA ','� ,&. `i F-NTATIVE ` APP XN =�t °x A OIL �� RESOLUTION NO. A R =SOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIA1 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO f "MMONGA, CALIFORNIA= CONDITIONALLY APPPOVING TENTATTV4 PARCEL W LUMBER 17057, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FERQN BOULEVAU FIND HELMS AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN :.UPPORT THEREOF (MM 209- 031 -57) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel M;4r Number W%37 submitted by Western States Development, applicant, for the purpese of subdividing into 1 parcel, for condominium purposes, the real property situated in the City of Rancho ',ucamonga, County of :San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APR 209 - 031- 57,,located at the northweHt cGraer of Feron Bculevard end Helms Avence, and WHEREAS, on danuAry 11, 1989, the planning Commi,sion held a duly advertised public hearing for, the above-described aap. NOW, THEREFORE, -THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMrIISSIOd I&SOLVED AS FOLLOWS, SECTION It That the following findings have been made: 1. That the neap is consistent with the General Plan. 2. 'Mat t,e improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with tho General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision end improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: This Commission finds anJ certifies that the pro3ect has been revfik—d—RT considered in compliance witk� the California Environmental Quality Act of 19711 and, further, this Conmistion hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 12057 is hereh approved subject to tTie attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: L. Street Imrprov*ents Shall be constructed per the approved Street Improvement plans, 'lip 2. All conditions DR 87-30 and "R 87.12 shall apply. J PLANNING CCP9ISSiOW RE20 �TION NO- TENTATIVE PARCEL 00 P 2 STATES OMLOPMENT AGE VED AND ADOPTED THIS 111H DAY of JAWARY 19 89. APP RO PLARMIG C( "ISSION OF THE CI':Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DY'm--- arry . e s :a rman ATTEST: ra u Or. ecre ary Commission of the City 01' Rancho and Secretary. of the planning Resoi�►ti ^n ssi� ° Iof the I, Brad Bullcr, r-�4�ti #y that the the Planning Cyca ca:9 � do hereby r�PCedg and adoRted by of the Planning Co» fission held regularly introdijce. -!y a regular Ming vote o to -gait: City of Rancho C' ®fiaan�uary, 1989, by the following on the 11th '0 Att=: COMISSIO%ERSI. HOES: CCISSIONERS: )WSENT: CO MISSIONERS: 1 CY e 'e F W r L g g wi "�'j {•M� p A L iij y ® Y. Q Z 8_ w L 9 m M L m 9 pp Y ■ y M 4 Lv� Y aw �y �O �Ly yds. `Vi a 2-2 _ �. Y �•� }�� `�. Y� Vy � y yi y.CCy. h` a CY Vb. V e y b y ig �r,IV ,��yyy •g 8�t. {y� ¢¢M�' ��yeY.ya r� ^It YT fa�� `A qr■�q� ��M s pysys Y � �yyjp� � M s� e N� < M V to • N m a a & J, SE M • R. q y Y s0 llf �eN l� yy • V� ��� .y.S�• � Jy \` 44 L C L) Y 1ftl moo.+ �. Ss! S CY yN GYY Q�a t 4YC Dp �:�Y •ylyw �`Y /q� LLL v Zug Pm IL as N 8 as • � �� � meet SZ_$ .�$'8 �€ :`,S y Mf MW 4^ 2r, • M^F� Yli sy p�� wMy �p 4c D .r N Mf ? YI � +r �y II y •y M p9 r r� Jaruary if, 1939 Ms. Cynthia Kirsnr 9320 gasoline P.O. B =x 687 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 RE: Egghead University Dear Cynthia: Per our. conversation, Rancho Associates request that the City of Ranches C=Amonga Manning Ccmmission issue a continuance for, the conditional use permit n8$ -48 - Egghead University. Your consideration in thiz matter is greatly aogreciateW and if you have any questic*is, please do not hesitate to call me at thp, number shown below_ e i ncere i y, Cathy '4dilreat ProF4'.• Manager Por Rancho Associates a 2740: Pie; a Real, Suite 300 'D Mission Viejo, CA 92691 (714) 643 -5888 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCP..MONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1989 TO: Chairman and - Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser', Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-48 - ESBHW UNIV - Ifie request to eStrtbllSh CO pu er c assr�oom and office in a leased space 1,000 square feet within an existing multi- tenant industrial park on 4,0 acres of land in the Haven Avenue Overlay District located at 917C'- 9190 Haven Avenue. Ar: 209- 252 -17. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIO"_ A. Action Re ested: Approval of a non,ronstruction Conditional s11�i:rm establish an office and computer classroom within ,in existing multi- tenant industrial center on the southwest orner of 7th Street and Haven Avenue. 4.. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Industr a 95T 1i1'ngs,�'"1ndu trial Park South - Multi Tenant Buildings and Vacant; Industrial Park East Vacant; 'Industrial Park West - Distribution Center; Industrial Park G. Genoral Plan Designations: Project tGe — rndus riaT Park North Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Indus,trial Park West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The project is developed with an existing multi-fenant industrial center. ITEM J I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPOgf CUP 88 -48 - EGGHEAD UNIVERSITY January 11, 1989 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations Number of Number of Type Square parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Building 1 nerony s Deli 1,200 1/100 12 5 Advanced Data Prod, 2,100 11250 9 9 State Farm Insurance 1,050 1/260 5 5 Plaza Travel 1,048 1/250 5 5 Austin, Cooper and 1,548 $125n ? 7 Price Insurance, Thomas Temporaries 943 1/251 4 4 Temps R ifs 1,290 1/254 6 6 Vacant 7,281 1/250 30 30 Proposed Egghead University Office 194 1/250 1 4 Classroom 3 employees 1/ employee 3 0 12 students 1/3 students 4 0 suildin2 2 Health Club 18,270 1/150 122 88* Building-3 Aavk n medical 7,W 11200 38 31 Trans American Insur, 1,995 1/250 10 t0 Norris -Repke 1,000 1/259 1 5 Vacant 7,595 1/25U 31 31 Total *Note: Commission approved shared parking concept for health club. F. Aoplicable Regulations: The Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea allows computer training as a Personal Service .se subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit br the Planning Commission. I1. ANALYSIS: A. General: The classroom and office use will operate Monday rthoughi`Saturday from 0 :00 a.m. to 9 :00 p.m. There will be a maximum of three employees and twelvs students (see Exhibit B. Issues: The primary issues related to locating this type of usewithin an industrial setting are compatibility to the surrounding businesses and parking availability. Them are a PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -48 - EGGHEAD UNIVERSITY January 11, 1989 ANk Papa 3 variety of uses within the center and compatibility problems are not expected. The Development Code requires one parking space per 250 square feet nf nffice use. For classroom uses one parking space is required fear every employee and one for every 3 students. This proposal for 194 square feet of office area with 3 employees and twelve :students will require eight parking spaces. There are only four parking spaces provided for this unit. This results in a deficiency of four parking spaces. Furi sr, within the cirter there already exists a deficiency of parking spaces. Due to the W gb percentage of vacant spy: °e, there does not appear to bi a parking probleir. on -site. Currently, 15,976 square feet W space (30%) is vacant. Staff has recommended the applicant' prepare a parking demand study prior to consideration of any use with a more intensive parking demand. The Foothill Fire Protection District has reviewed this application and would require tenant improvement plans ;n be submitted to the District prior to occupancy. C. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Part 1 0; the Initial M—ucYf ana cN-Rp a on or art 2 of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to a classroom use locating within this Indu &`°ial Park. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve this application. Staff cannot make the following findings: 1. The proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Developw�nt Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located. 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearinq in the ME Uyeport newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to a proper y owners within 300 feet of the property. 5-3 PLANNING CDhMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88-48 - EGGNrADJNIVERSITY January 11, 1989 Page 4 W V. RECC�GRE %DATI(JN� Based upon the above analysis Staff has the 0M'�9�optiari5 for the Planning Commission: I. Continue Conditional Use Permit 88 -48 i applicant to Prepare a.,Qarking demand study, or order . for the B. Deny Conditional. Use attached Resolution of d1erroit enial 88 -48 through -adoption of the R , , _fully itte I Ciad er --_ r . e BB:CK :mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A "e Exhibit "B" - Site ePlan Applicant Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Resolution of Denial I] December 12, 1988 3700 S. Susses Street, Suite L > Swta ADS, CA 02704 (714) 65KJ0 City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Community Development Planning Commission c/o Ms. Sarah McAfee Cushman & Wakefield of California 701 N. Haven Ave, #300 Ontario, CA. 91764 Dear Sirs: As requested in your "Check-List for a Conditional Use Permit ", item B.4., this letter will explain the proposed use of a suite in the existing structure known as Haven Plaza, located at 9170 -9190 Haven Ave. Ask Egghead University, a service of Egghead Discount Software, conducts instructor led classroom education for adult users of microcomputers. A twelve student classroom with a small lobby /office will be in operation Monday through Saturday, from Sam to 9pm. A maximum of three (3) employees will be housed in this facility. Our typical student is a corporate employee or executive. Currently employees from the City c,2 Rancho Cucamonga attend our claa:2es in our Santa Ana facility. Lockheed Aircraft Service Co. is also a valued client that sends it's staff to the Santa Ana facility. Our ability to serve the people of the "Inland. Empire is paramount to our continued growth in Southern California. Our reason for wishing is lease a suite in this particular building is due to several factors, includinte: - Freeway accee.jability - Deli on site - Parking availability - Available signage - General maintenance 8 appearance of the facility - Main street vieability - Agreeable hours of operation with the property owner I hope this letter has adequately addressed the appropriate issues for you to issue our permit so that we may act quickly to ready this space for our clients. Please do not hesitate to contact me for further informa:.ion. Sincerely, &_tov� jystriat e iynt Towne Manager Egghead Ut.iversity V +v iV _ _c.e;__Terrv_Procto' ,¢ � �+'•�' E It V` mot, • J s ^y., ��1 1 r.,;� =? ' F. 1 f r• q. �1 `r� _ . — .moo'.—.,- 3e.:., 8 +�.e •�'� j � { NORTH CITY OF ITEM.. P q RANCHO CUCAMONGA `�ANN'ING DIVISION ' pXHMrr; "27 SCALE: 11 e - ererr_0 ATY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION TITL& t4c 1 c.r NORTH RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ` - THE CITY OF eFOCHO CUCA14ONGA DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NQ. 88 -48 FOR A CLASSROOM AND OFFICE IN A LEASED SPACE OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET WITHIN AN EXISTING MULTI - TENANT PARK ON 4.01 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN THE HAVEN AVLNUE OVERLAY DISTRICT (SUBAREA 6) - APH: 205 - 262 -17. A. Recitals. (1) Egghead University has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. Resolution. $8,48 as described in the title )f this Hereinafter sn this kesolution, the sub„ec t Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 11th of January, 1989, the Planning Comais$ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Conducted a duly not$ceti public hearing on thL_ application and concluded said hearing on that dam (iii) All legal prerequisites to t4i adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. FLOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the °lanning Concission of the City of Rancho CucaWnga as follows: I. This COMIission hereby speCifically finds that «rl of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of 4,111s Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence ,presented to this CO= __;on during the above - referenced public hearing on January 11, 1989, including written anC oral staff reports, � with public testi�ony, this COwlssion hereby sneci 'Icaily finds ogether as fellows; Haven Avenue with a street f frontage of 334 feetrandrlotldeptth oft3077feet9-,nd is Pre se 9'y x 1p'o aad with wlti- tenant industrial park; and 240 parking (b) The property to the north of the subject site is multi-tenant buildings, uil the property to the south of that site consists of tenant buildings and vacant land, the property to the east is multi- tenant industrial and vacant, and the property to the west is distribution Cent°,rr, (c) That the proposed use requires eight parking which only four spaces are provided. spaces, of r(15 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 88 -48 - EGGHEAD UNIVERSITY January 11, 1989 Page 2 c 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing nnd upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (L) That the proposed use, will 5e detrimental to the public health, safety, o? welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the viciriV. (c) That the proposed use does not comtrly with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set, fore in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AN,J ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989. PLANNING CONSISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMSONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman i.TTEST: "Brad Buller, secrel5ry I, Brad Buller, Secr_tary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th, der of January, 1989, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMMISSIONERS: NOES: CCn'+iMiISSIONERS: ABSERT: COMMISSIONERS: I' il E-13 DATE: 10: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAUONGA �,;CA�oA� STAFFREPORT a r o� a s. z January II, 1989 V, Chairman and Mewbers of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner 140DIFICATION TO CONDZT' DIAL USE PERMIT 87 -05 - CRCSS AND �l TUTRERM -eplII' X request amena the site plan a`n r M Tfn- eTevan -is on a. proposed 6,200 square foot sanctuary on 5 acres of lane in the Vey Low Residential District (less than 2 units par acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan loc ;,eed at 6723 Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 227 - OF1 -03. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action n Requested: Approval of building elevations and , "te plan. - B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - -Gaarden a`rw reen Ouse "Faci i i Fy; Etiwanda Specific Plan South Existing Single Family Residential with horse C corrals; Etiwanda Specific Plan East - Existing Single Family Residential; Et -rda Specific Plan West Vacant Land; Victoria Community Plan C. General Plan Designations: Project jeit bi elm- very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) South Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The currant use of the site is citrus grove. a natunia-T ground slopes north is south at an approximate 3 percent grL_ . There are four palm trees along Etiwanda Avenue frontage which are protected as historical t E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -05 - CROSS AND CROWN LUTHERAN CdURCH January 11, 1989 Page 2 landmarks. There are Eucalyptus windrows along the north, east and south boundaries (the row along the south boundary iy off - site). E. Parking Calculations: Type Parking of Use Ratio Chinch 1 per each 4 fixed sears (180 seats pr( 11. ANALYSIS: Number of Number of Spaces Spaces Re ui� red Provided 45 5B ivided) A. Background: Conditional Use Permit 87 -05 was originally rev evr,- aj;d approved by the Planning Commission. on November 25, 1987. Following this approval the applicant appealed condit;ons of approval to the City Council. The Cif, Courril approved the project, with modified conditionY of approval, on January 6; 1588. In October, 1968, the applicant submitted for Plan Check, Staff determined that changes to the site plan and building elevations were significant enough to require reapplication as a modification V4 the Conditional Use Permit. B. General: The applicant is proposing to develop the front ,x180 ee o the 5 acre pa -cel. The present develtopment proposal includes a church sanctuary, church office, classrooms and preschool. The original site plan proposal (see Exhibit "B ") included a large play field, a 4,900 square foot sanctuary, and two office and classroom buildings, situated directly south of the sanctuary, totaling 2,300 square feet. Modifications to the site plan (see Exhibit "C ") show a large reduction in the amount of land being developed and incl;:de the removal of the two office and classroom buildings, an expansion of the sanctuary building by 1,300 square feet, and a slight rearrangement tc the parkin) layout. Changes to the building elevations inclvde removal of the very dominant wood trLA %s elements, removal of the. stained glass window on the bell tovN'r, and modifications to the roof line (see Exhibits "0" and "E "). Im PLA4N1Nf COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 87-05 - CROSS AND CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH January 11, 1989 Page 3 C. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Coleman, Emeric , o,itoy) reviewed this project on Oecemi)er 8, :988. The CommitteK -fouid the modifications to the project consistent with the d(,4an of the o- iginai approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The windows should be multi- paned. 2, The proposed chain ling, fence along the east project boundary should be replaced with either a wrought iron fence ur a wood fence (consistent with the railing adjacent to the church). 3. Because of possible delays in the installation of bells in the boll tower, the applicant may install imitation bells and the wood header the bells are attached to. 111. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the eve o4, fit e and the General Plan. The proposed uses, building design and site plan, together with the recommended conditions, of approval, are in compliance with all applicable City standards. In addition, the prop -ty will not be detrimental to the adje;=Pnt properties or cause adverse_ environmental impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in TheFaTly--Report newspaper, he property posted, and notices sent o al ` pr poly owners within 309 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the modification to Conditional Use Permit 87 -05. Z fully tee a City P naer BB: TG :iml g Attachments: Exhibit "A�y" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit 'IS" - Site Plan (original approval) Exhibit "C" - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations (original approval) Exhibit "E" - Proposed Building Elevations Planning Commission Resolution 87 -209 t City Council Resolution 88 -078 Resolution of Approval with Conditions ow u t L �L r wuw }wo Hi -. i6it Ki`!117�yT�y b ai La EI ucwa M . L. V. vg ;; IO. �K V.. •VIA' N, . -i -'OK, NORTH CITY OF --4 ITEM: RANCHO COCA TITLE. LL K _A� . �S A3Att1�T/`s T°°f�°$l`irI�"t'14T a+a�rse� ern. it v Original pear QuaiitY CITY o.'. rrEM: zV110 07-45 RANUD C AIMONGA MU: r 90 �' 'r7 t� l MIA s°* r•p •ANH /rte. n. � • 1h. Ny,•�lV.N fey }.—01PIVYt n �.9i..i.. ~.ss e'drr. Aw : 4��a. • . ,t_a . j '• t n H � � .I.t• r6vlor. ;;. w a �• 1 r Original pear QuaiitY CITY o.'. rrEM: zV110 07-45 RANUD C AIMONGA MU: r 90 �' 'r7 t� l r•p •ANH /rte. n. � • 1h. Ny,•�lV.N fey }.—01PIVYt n �.9i..i.. ~.ss e'drr. Aw : 4��a. • . ,t_a . Original pear QuaiitY CITY o.'. rrEM: zV110 07-45 RANUD C AIMONGA MU: r 90 �' 'r7 t� l k 1�1 f 1 ; l Orig na! P&jr Quality 0 i SITS E CM W Im t>k?.AC•� +a'1.•Nrs.KN'.'N +m1.wM...s wrt+? � {.:'u.W.6s •w4al �tntaUw.rrrfry . t M..lt �'i 'aofcrraK,.MI•a.. ew..ir aualas�lrla.T .Y1eNp 4 � 1 NORTH r i 'CITY ITEM: z�� RAINCHO CUCA O A TITLE: -P—tA V-TV °.,—n'rVTQTf?liti isvi r:Thsrn. j 42&% At W. Qw Original Poor Quality CITE' OF RANUiO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVDU'� 6X ( rc�Ent: �� �'...► TrME f ' ► EXytPt''"- _n ,—SCALE Orio s' ?Ir Quality '� '���• • f•i +e•r- L Fjl� `• • M1M ,�jy�T i anw Mr L m� N�IWM 0 CITY OF rte: 4�a,"5' W-416 _ PLANNhNG L N -� MIT SCA[ �sU« ( �F(k Original Po6r7 Quaiity rr � 1 ,•� IM ISM �.aQt.TTtd LLL..�Vda`P►G?N � c.f4N�l�' i CIYY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCO TLS. war C1 LANWI TMr. nTVTATnm � v���+t+. �� r►t1 am t.. w-- _`.. Original ()r,Erj,,jaj Poor QualitJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO PLANNING DIVISI0.4 T-9A 1 I p hw� T I � L 2 .. I k lie, it EXHIBIT.- . & SCA 1 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -209 A RESOLUTION OF Tt9E RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87 -05 FOR A PROPOSAL TO BUILD A 4900 SQUARE FOOL SANCTUARY BUILDING AND A 2,300 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND CLASSROOM BUILDING; AND OPERATE AN EXTENDED DAY NURSERY AAD PRESCHOOL ON 5 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW DENSITY RESXDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAI: 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED AT 6723 ETIWANDA AVENUE APN 227- 061-03 A. Recitals. M Cross ar�d Crown Luthoran Church has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -05 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 25th of November, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites ;a the adoption of this Resolutioa have occurred. 8. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby, found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 25, 1987, including written and oral stiff reports, together with public testimony, this Comission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to prnperty located at 6723 Etiwanda Avenue with a street frontage of 331.18 feet and lot depth of 662.70 feet and is presently improved with rock curb which must be restored per the Etiwanda Srecific Plan; and %- (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a garden /greenhouse acility, the property to the south of that site consists of rural single family residences, the property to the east is existing single AK family residential, and the property to the west is vacant: parcels. 4 fl�-a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 87 -05 CROSS 3 CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH November 25, 1987 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during tte above - referenced pub ?ic hearing and upon the specific findings of Facts set forth in paragraph and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and ,oncludes as follows. (a) That the proposed use is in accora with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, togetner with the conditions applicable t4ereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use compliti with Bach of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds ant; c.ortifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the Calirornia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Cm. ission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Rased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission Fe-eby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this ra�orence. Planning Division (1) The perimeter block wail shall be constructed at the north and south property listes to the point where Phase I development ends. Any future development of the site will require extension of the perimeter block wall. (2) All windows of each building shall be multi - pang. (3) The roofing material must be tile. A sample of the material shall oe submitted for Planning Division approvel prior to issuance of building permits. (4) The applicant shah submit for Planning Division approval samples of siding and rock prior to issuance of building K?mits. Also, the applicant shall prepare a test ,psrol of the rock venewr for review by the Planning Division during construction to verify quality of rock material and workmanship. r PLANNING COWI5SION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 87 -05 • CROSS b CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH Movember 25, 1987 Page 3 Engvne4lring Division (1) The existing curb any gutter on Etiwanda Avenue shah be removed and replaced per City Standard for Cobble Curb and Gutter (No. 307 ). (2) The existing overhead utilities (telecommurications and etectrfcal) on the project side of itiwanda Avenue shell oe undergrounded frn-� the first pale off site north of the project's ,.orth boundary to the first pole o €€ site south of the project's south boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement aareemer~ to recover cne -half the City adopted cosi7 for t- dergrounding from futgre development (redevelopal " as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. (3) Vista Street abutting the east property line of the v.J."g. project site shall be completed with a temporary cul- de -sar, 18 font radius within the existing ,,►` street width, designed to the satisfaction of the ps City Engineer. 6. The Deputy Secretary to t4�t Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND :IDQPTED THIS 25TH DBE. ij Ni)YEMBER, 1967. PLANNING COMM3S5ION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY AT I, Brad Huller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularl;, introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a r:gular meeting of the Planning Commission held . on the 26th day of November, 2987, by the fallowing vote -fro -wit: AYES: COWISSIOhERS: CHITLEA, HCNIEL, 0,AKESLEY, EMtRICK HOES, CQWISSIONERS: NONE ASSENT; C044ISSIONERS: TOL.STOY ^G �I V( uj W 2 d 3x. if �� H Y O CLJ Y« b SL LE Wigg,, Y C�O ^ +• ,yp��Mpy,�wsp ^Y �Ya+ A+ m $3 aej. Y H. jJs VC�� . ■1 s. NpG i.TNV�aB1i1 aAd�rC. .•~. a� 9 �C"rr ^■w r�nj v 'pY'� .yiy p �1 a 666 Be +.Y5!'- yes ••�Q Y��C gL �Q�i I�Q. Yq� YyI. ®tl •� Y qr i..Y�eo MI�j M GC 11 Y�N �j I, °�yj �a '� g �iw .giy ■. rn $ ^■py p�RS � w� ~N '� Y ^ .p V `• `qY�'� Y� ~ p �L 6L M L �1 Y �i ~" 14i <•'� •�Y °`�••L iN1^•. �_� O`. 1 Y��`a q�' ate' p �Y 8 y N - Y O 1 m ^ � Y OG*93 L ST 45 6aT !V !ggAM..O^ Ni�v_Mg Yf.T y J A - .-Y � A O' � � � + • Ode x ! WE ills- 3 �{+ Y 0 MAN- Z; T r d 7 a R O F y� 4 J p of h Qi v� :4C h a El E RY a N� � +N C q q P :LNo V O ` GR � a= a r °Y yM a E�bgCY C � 6 TQ w ow�C�cs + Y M id'ar QqS� 4 e ; M Y ms� r alt. S 3 2' +r'r!J Y..f jig Y Y t _F55yta v��� Vim^ Y O N� wY V Y 2 =11 N Y Y a 4Oa �Y ms's L wpb �.q.q �3 «yy Vrr V Mrf a'N� 4 v°ro��a6�.R sus i «» N La�tNiiiCCi9y� «� yq. ?i.®p D ML b~�O MZp� C 4� gyp` QQii gY�s�a�{Y1 �4P?s0' Ya »a«L'wm 5 4 i M.�}WP ~ N � G �aY�„Y� It �d��s �+ an C•��'a6a V �^Jb H a C vOrigina! #g . C ya b Q �4 N 42 M� 3� b � L gs� prr��s +M9 A a �'Gec V L K Y i a N M Y wt a S� w� AI o� d� i�CCq� °e 4 r Y L atyii � qg t5 ��4c;1 3Yo� p a yN� � Aso M Qs, H -zip "� f!! i1531 N IN y� yryrj� t l yI q opp� L� F b L Y Y a 4� a� e8 ` N « i �O Q �j yCjg�?� O� Yy�rN a~ v ��YY11�MxY4• NY1 YYCs�1 N tl.�L6 bLn/0'. T`s;� y4 yj3n �III111 YY4� .V4 � � 44E all 2N s� _Va S.. E., N iiiAAA u'!° p �'%� :rimy` 21 -- 1�iw�c� -M!— "I " NE$a_a, 'ydwe aY ��9 r gsa� t "N'ifq av� ~ i {'$ an_ —. z5a: go law h° 3 "_$ pi:jY$j f4%TL ¢Z Y Y is ^ i py. YY 3$3 � i yy■ 0� y} eM. ��� {t y�pe �pigf�� • X5.9 r iMC V I Y.M y�. (�. ' �A/p,I N+U fd Oy 6iSs v� Koe c6 r ILL pO. Q.Y+vi N iv J 7 a11,1 «j ..•N AX4 <GtY,: N �4 Q W i Original Poor Quality t6 +6 C� yYuq 1 y�Qy L N$� Y N Y O tl �� - 40. ��'• Y~ O Y C� y n O 1�iiU- °ON ^« O +� y �• � �O~ ��Vff UUOy LL LLOZ Y OL pCU `��`''11 C �•Y i{1. Up ^••VU aC. OL��,g N u 4 �U R+ iy p`y �� ✓. � NNO pYSq pC 4 xy ay+M Y ^L9L t �C11 Y~ N P� ~�O OO L23 V �Y= �yL Lei Vai. 4G y =1 q S NCCC �6 ( LN M� O` Y•� MNg rR ' ■J■'J s yy + yy pLLL••• Nil Y9� "• UC� �R JGN ^ eNU•tVMNY� l ^N U p Y C� ~ N vN�+ .YeYa�2.+cc xisY�S'f"��d(�gr';YOL e asp YCY T N L L ' 1„gO ltlL���dYi MGM 9N0 1�NS �(N Vii O >01iM6O b✓i'k.. , i t .+ � ■ 6 L L C a�ga� � z,�UUtl'Ve R1}Y1 �x 6 9y UNVO OOYY yOO yy� GG �w L Y O OY v ^YC i 14 1g� q r y c� M. n• « y O L i6 QI 6 +) oxR 91 -..g . St s S�g� 3° C >P .rsg mMO E »� ��`• �� as � K �� *s O` pa ���``�tl 4r N Y *� OP N N yn CtYT �i CY Ln 6� q�y • Y «� a e +lL !q� O Yft� V s sue, io• r � w'4 �e"i j` ^`s P tl � q Am 14 ES tz Div�gd '� :.'�"� E�y� ago 'o 2S��cgm Y `■ 4 e._. ,`y` }yp eL•' � EE�•• s. � J M 0 � � N � ��JY � N � � OONOO ,i Y O ..H Y �j OOOO •�W� V ^ ` O q `P �� ` M N so— SV N�i :cr_o L+ O� . �p 3 • 7 P 's� aMF i P w HM b 0 �� y N O q P :e u d N � i v A wFg$ � yy L « r • gN N M � M€N ' «p1L � YyyO r` . M �Y O. " z WS 01 .° ° a "' ® 11 bl LI E a r6 C V ' a a� 0 • "L Y ,q� a tic O ti fn �• ``M F.»{f xf] a s�� id y y� b t p i »' A K �a 3E 3 g �Y z% � �� • Aga Original Foor Qualify Y y E A p� d N�GY4�M• yVy�M� + �� dL�•� L �4� r ACM..N � ^ p •• i r b y� yy Y .� a § J S i 4v Sig pg� g M^ :ai _5 �T+ 8 � � C1 \�j�Vb f4 -0 �, '" J Alt Al Y 4 'g s i ►L � 0 fey,. '1 A 6 a� LA LA asrP Yd �yw EM t +! p H N al r�i�° sVQ +due V YO. 411 S-11 ei 3n 4p - ;$y .Aa g v_`�yk 4~ C M pj M C M N M ��7 P N e.l� Q>iSy�y P �e.0 r�Oq�lpr. A�a I••40 YqSA AZIS !L�. IS tie K'i JiI a r6 C V ' a a� 0 • "L Y ,q� a tic O ti fn �• ``M F.»{f xf] a s�� id y y� b t p i »' A K �a 3E 3 g �Y z% � �� • Aga Original Foor Qualify Y y E A p� d N�GY4�M• yVy�M� + �� dL�•� L �4� r ACM..N � ^ p •• i r b y� yy Y .� a § J S i In 4v Sig pg� g M^ :ai �T+ fip. iiii *EPEE � $ i j 4 'g s i ►L � 0 fey,. '1 A a� asrP I EM In 4v Sig pg� g M^ :ai �T+ y i ►L � 0 fey,. '1 A asrP M ybOOy �aa t.t •1 �Qp6. ei _. e� V u, a r0 3 Y y� C N _- i 7 T • 1 41 l a� cwo�Y$y. is- ` us w 20 yLy aY3 •'i L� wy L Z TL � ^� 12�H C ♦» F1' �`L,'V6v wyy tyYlNNO rC. qq.L Y° VyNb 1 4 Y Clr�q p� �.t � 44 4CO C AYHN -Mi y4p •tV�� �L�YaYYm�tQc " N NM pyG FI U^ 44 $+ V V ro di a Q=y .M W�C� g0 �0� " 2Sawd 81F ap9aa b y C W ••i N r1 Q Yi �n A poor jt�ua1it� � I Orlemal v ll "A Lala� p oa y y y ;pit spa JAN UN S!f S 2 g y x y pp is ,I s x a gas. q r • L iAi w qu � +6�� Vs+ Ty {r�. �� L� w. Y� its � y 3 S� I� v 24 ay TV Pj P wa M��x�SN y L N �syMY` iIi 4 !H CI Nt, O w �y� �y wC,3A �tl !19 " i'w F�gTyycwA n.` • I N w NlM"4Y A1, UHL dN IN VLtc�'y, c,14i ttlR�,i $w M A U N /q fA 11 v G. I Original Poop k�uaidty �O`eN YY� Y�L N W ^plt tqN � c. `9 Y�C� 1.°i pf` 3 isN'�V�O m May V uiv ° .51.� isy, yyC��}6 y` �. 61� �i O }} O iii333 .d :M vi LF s1 ° '' b' Z_ AY yM 21r Yr,� lVygyqy� +ma+y y``N E LyY8=2 f�. b ^ >.� M�(�6M��1 N° 0.0i <ii is WY +`VH V el U �� �U w L b C� C�Y Mayc® i� eL se N. Y N ��aWW <�L D e1 Y S u �Y L N N M L � b Y � W V r 9 O Em M y 6 N 8 Fat f= d y h N M y M� N Y (V A J (4p L N YAy y U� V MN4 Y e CA �y y O.0 �R y� Y p9 n YY� i� A y 69 • N Zoo H %UM i s Z, z; Am tj V 42! R L Y ,t N Y IS O rg •O g�y �JN�.b �� y , b flw z 11- P fJr° V ° by b {y. e yy W L Va L4 I 'M0 ryvV wryry\ ii V W d a� se ea 9yS § C iy N pp Ypp S r Y A � O J r Y U5 ci a.n Q�Ya LPL •may r M Ow NisVpp y 6� i:�0 ZOg N `^ O C y 4y 9 M LM I Y i 3 At v Ul D s L V46tl ga�Or G O ids•` `o•p - $ `' j` f� Mu•t' S g •s�` 4. —M� 06�eyp �,• ,g- A w yq� Nqi & WM M di �M FS�A aCW Jt 41 In Vl +w oklr a1 'plo°lf Qualm Mp w sa ■ N ■ O b � � s y�y[33 sbi a a" 2.2 w dq K Y 9 E S �S g ►N o c ��V Y Y Ai i «Y _a e @pN iQ O -7 B OAS 5.43 aa a �j N ZB — N Y w YY M 1 � y� aK ± it 12 r �NF All �.aui A i�au. @ N 1 E E RESOLD =ION NO. 88 -075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCX0 CUCAii NGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING AND PPROVING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 'fOR CONDITIONAL USE Pv14IT $7-05 TO ALLOW THE DEVEL?PMNT OF A, 4,900 SQUARE FOOT SANCTUARY BUILDING AND OPERATION OF AN EXTENDED DAY IMRSERY AND PRESCHOOL ON 5 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 ZVELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN. LOOTED AT 6723 ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. W Rev. Richard A. Nelson. on behalf of Crosti and Crowa Luthei° Church. has filed an application for approval of Calditicnai Use Permit 87 -u:,, described above in the titl^ of this Resolution. Hereafter,, in this Resolution. the subject Conditional Dae Permit request is referred t- as "the Conditional ;?se Permit ". (ii) On November 25. 1887, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamcn,,a conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the Conditional Use Permit. and following the conclusion of said hearing. adopted their Faiolution No. 87 -'209 thereby approving the Conditional Use Permit. (iii) The applicant has filed a timely appeal of the approval represented in said Resolution No. 87-209 on the basis of two (2) Conditions conLsined in said Resolution. The C>nditions sProaled are described as follows: a. Planning Condition No. 3: "The. roofing material must be j tile. A sample of the material shall be submitted for planning Division approval prior to issucuce of building petmits.K b. Naaineariag Condition No. 3: "Vista Street abutting the east property line of the project site shall be completed with a temporary cul- de -aac. 18 -foot radius, within the existing street width. designed to the satisfaction of the City Eaginwar. (iv) on February* 3. 1988, the City Council of tie City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the appeal of the Conditional Use Permit and, on said data, concluded the public hearing. (v) All legal prerwquisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Qy Resolution No. 88 -07' Page 2 B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS FOUND, DETERAiINED AND RESOLVED by the City Council of thG City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals. Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and concurs with the issuance of the mii:igat,ld Negative Declaration issued on November 25. 1987. 3. Hasod upon the rul!atential evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced February 3. 1988, hearing. including written staff reports, the minutes of the aboverreferenced November 26. 1987. Planning Commission meeting and the contents of Plans. °ng Commission Resolution No. 87 -209, this Council specifically finds as follows, a. The Conditional use Permit applies to property located at 6723 Etiwanda Avenue within the Vary Lcw Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Ptivace, Specific Plan; b. The property to the north and south of the subject site is ri.thin the Very Low Density Reaidential Matrict and is currantly developed with a Garden and Greenhouse facility and a single family residence, respectively. The pscperty to the east and vest is within the Low Leasity Residential Diatrict and is currently developed with single family housing to the east and is vacant to the vest; c. The Conditional Use Permit contemplates the developmtst of a sanctuary building and classr fva building and is psrmittsd with the approval of a Coediti.onal Use Pet:ait within the Very Low Density Residential District of the Stiwands Specific Plan; d. The requirement of the Planning Commission Resolution No. 87 -209 (Condition No. 3 -- Angineering Division) that the developer aball complete Vista Street. which abuttz the esat property ll,as of the project site, with a temporary cut -de -sac. 18 -foot radius, within the existing attest width, is modified to requira the payment of an in -lieu fee to the satisfaction of the City Engineer in the amount of cost " construct t straight curb morose the Vast terminus (curb to curb) of Visa Street. The amount is to be held in an account for the Local Street Rehabilitst:�on project. Etivanda Area 1. to be used to cover a portion of the cost for the City project to constrict the modified turn around at said location; e. The requirement of Planning Commission No. 87 -2U9 (Condition No. 3 - Planning Division) that the developer Zust provide roofing material of the continues to be an important and necessary 'condition in furtherance o£ the granting of the subject Conditional Use Permit. The requirement is consistent with the intent of the current policy which requires concrete or clay roofing for any new projects in residential areas; � aa- Resolution No. 88 -075 Page 3 f. The Conditional Use Permit request as specified will not contradict the goals or objectives of the General Plan. Development Code or Etiwanda Specific P)an of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and vottld not promote a detrimental condition to the persons or properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject site.. 4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dur<,-- the above - referenced 1��blic hearing and upon the specific findings of facts forth in paragraph 1. a and 3 above. this Council hereby f3,nds and concludes as f- allows: a. The +' onditional Use Permit is consistent with the General Plan. Development Code and Etivanda Specific Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; b. The design or improvements of the Cot-14tional Use Permit is consit —t with the General Plan. Development Code and Etivanda Specific Plan of tns C-ty of Rancho Cucamonga; C. The subject site is puysically suitable for tho type of development proposed= d. The design of the proposed development is not likely to Cause substantial ermironmentrl, ch mage or avoidable injury to humans or wildlife or their L ,tbi tat; e. The drkalopment is not likely to cause serious wealth problems; and f, The design of the development will not con €listiwith any easement acquired by the public at large. now of record. for acesss through or use of the property within tho proposed subdivision. 5. Barad upon the findiaga and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1. 2. 3 and 4 above. this ouLail hereby approves the Conditional Use Permit subject to all of the Conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 87 -205 (a copy of which is attached hereto and uarksd as Ex @ibit "A ") with the specific exception that :,,ondition No. 3 - Bnginesrina Division *hall be replaced to read as follows: a. An in -lieu fee in the amount of coat to construct a straight curb across the west terminus (curb to curb) of Vista Streett shall be paid to the satisfaction of tba City Tnginser prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. the Council hereby provides noti_ :c Ttev. Richard A. Valson of the Cro ^,s and Croon Lutheran Church, that the tim within which judicial review Of the decision ropresento by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provi3ons of California Code of Civil. Procedure Section 1094.6. l 7. Its City Clark is hereby directed to: (a) car" tN the adoption of that ttusolution. and (b) forthwith transmit cQ tified copy o this Resolution. by Certified Nail. Raturn Receipt Requested, to Rev. Rilchard A. Nelson at his address as par City recox a. I �` Resolution No. 88 -075 Page 4 PASSED. APPROVED. and ADOPTED this 17th dap of F+hrutry. 1988. AYE$•. Broun. Buqu*tr, Stout. Wright. King NOES: None ABSENT: None 00 A A, #.A I Dennis L. Stout. Mayor ATTEST. Beverly & Authele-t. City Clerk 1. BE7=1: A. AUTBEGET. CITY C4ERK of the Cite of Ran-ho Cucamonga. California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was daly passed. approved. and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of February. 1988. Executed this 18th drr of rebruasy, 1985 at Rancho Cucamonga. California. Beverly Anthliat. City Clerk { RESOLUTION NO, 87 -209A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87 -05, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE SITE PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS ON A PROPOSED 6,200 SQUARE FOOT SANCTUARY ON 5 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOIN' RESIDENTIAL. DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED AT 6723 ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FlP.DINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR: 227- 061 -03. A. Recitals. (i) On November 25, 1987, this Commission adopted its Resclution No. 87 -209, thereby approving, subject to specified conditions, Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -05 which provides for the construction of a church and preschool on 5 acres within the Very Low Residential District. (ii) Cross and Crows Lutheran Church has filed an application f r the issuance of the modification to Conditional Use Pern.it No. 87 -05 ds described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application ". ;iii) On the 11th of January, 1989, the Planning Corte ;:;3iv° of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a daly noticad publ c nearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detemined and resolv.a by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presentel to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on January 11, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, �aeh,r with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as foiiows: (a) The application applies to property 1r,aated at 6723 Etiwanda Avenue with a street: frontage of 331.18 feet and log; depth of 662,70 feet, and r (b) The property+ to the ports of the subject site is a garde►.igreen house facility, the property to the south of that site consists of rural single family residen4ces, the property to the east is existing single family ;residential and the property to the west is vacant residential parcels. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIOM NO. 87 -209A CUP 87 -05 - CROSS AND CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH January 11, 1989 Page 2 11 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the sp €cific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs Y and 2 above, this rommission hereby finds and concl(1es as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of trt(i district in which the site is locate. (b) Tfiat the proposed use, tsget:4er with the coftMfAnns applicable there), will not be detrimental to the public he lth, safety, or welfare, ar materially irrjuric 's to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (e) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; 4. This Commission hereby finds arM certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered ipicompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, f— thor, this Commission issued a Negative Declaration on November 25, 1987. 5. Based upon the findings and cunciusions set fo -th in paragraphs 1, Z, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the 4,: 6 at.on oubiect to adding each and every condition set forth below: Planning Division (5) All conditions of approval coritained in Planning row mission Resolution No.. 87 -209 and City Cc'�cil Resolution No. 88- 075 shell apply. (G) The proposed chain link fence along the east project boundar; shall be replaced with either a wrought ',.,on fence or a wood fence ',consistent with tfe railsslg adjacent to the church). Details shall be approved prior to issuance of build-ling rarmits. (7) The installation of cast metal bells in the bell to«er may be postponed to a subsequent phase, provided that imi altion belts are installed prior to sanctuary occupancy for a period not to exceed two years from caid occupancy date. (8) On -site drive aisles shall be minimam 26 feet wide, (9) Puking spaces shall conform to City adcpttod standard and compact sixes. lu PLAM" COW'jSSION RESOLUTION NO. 87-209A a? 87 -05 - CROSS AND 'CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH Jawary 11, 1989 Pago 3 5. The Secretary to this Comission shall certify to the. adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED ANn, ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MNAR°, 1989. PLAMM114 COMISSIGN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA�ii &A BY: Larry T. McHipl , Mirman ATTEST: k3rab w ier, becretary, *, Brad Buller, Secret&y of tae Planning; Coazmissin of the C-r of Raecho Cucamonga, do hEreby certify thrt the. roregoing h.Oso'lutfon was duly and regularly 1ntroduc0, passed, and adorcad by the Piasrning Coamission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular weting of the 'Fiartrrrr Cocamission held on the 11th day of January, 1959, by the folTowir✓° vote-to-wit., AYES: C%14!SSIONERS: NOES: COMMII54Y?uERS: ABSENT: COys'!lISSIONERS I i C!"'Y OF R& CHO CUCATMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: January 11, 1989 TG: Chairman and Hembers of the Planning Commission FRO:: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott MurpV. Associate Planner �P SUBJECT: tIODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -26 OJIS ZI�TEr SfiS" = `i"regeesta e`3Te"Biii erg "3n prev, usTy agproje�i shopping center (Thomas V;nery), located at the northeast corner of poo'4hill Boulevard and Vineyard f:Yena - VN: 208 - 101 -10 and 11, 24ZKGROUND: On January 2, 3988, thi Manning COAIssi -,n reviewed annT ov`ed plans for the d:velopment of a 111,000 square font con-anercial center. 11,0 plans called for a developmewt of nine (9) buildings and the preservation of the existing winery building. Initially, the plans ,ndicated that only Pad "A% bated at the southeast corre, of the site, would be used for restaurant uses (Souplantation ?. In discussing the P07- %ioility of Teasing space within Zhe Thomas Winery project with itcterested parties, the Opplirant has found a restaurant who wishes to use the existing winery bpfleing. In that the original proposal did not provide suftfc;i -4nt par;,-fnq to ac:.ommodate additional restaurant area other thin Pad "A ", the applicant it now requesting the deletion of Building "J" in ordsr to provide the r- cessary parking to "- t the demand of titaa restaurant tenant. Zt. ANAL SIS; Originally, the winery building was proposed to be entirely retail. spactj. With the proposal for the restaurant use, the win avy building wf,,l be divided into 1,500 square fit of retail space. and 8,500 quar•,f feet of restaurant isse. Wit ,4 ta4 restaurant mcupying a mWoritf of the vines~ building, an addi'sipnal 81 parking spaces would be roquired. in srder to met this additional parking dWnd, the applicant is propo�, ?,% to eliminate Building "JO sae .hioit "8 "� and reariasign th,3 parking area north of the winery bui »ding (see Exhibit " =,`, j. In addition, . reductions in building sues in other arerfi of the project have resulted in the overall square foa aV of aq proja±cn f,ca 11`.1001) to 3 0,006. The applicant is now providiq 537 paehin s�wuros i53ti roquired). iTEh3 L PLANNTW COMISSIOH STAFF REPORT RE: ChP 87-26 - OAS WESTORS January 11, 1989 f Page 2 A 3L ! On October 6, 1988, '*-a Design Review Committee (Tolstoy, NcNiei, 11 Coleman) considdred tie rppli- cant's request to delete BuOding "J ". at that time,. the Com�ittee reconnended approval of the proposo chcnge ba-� Mated that the action must be formalized through iw-dification to the Conditional Use Per-mit. Staff is recosimending that the planter on the west side a(F� uilding "J" be relocated tq the north . side of the Pxi sting wN; Lry (Building " K" ) and that additional tree wells 'be provided west of the still building. 111. RECOMMENMATION; Staff recommends that the Fn ?nning Com;issl -m, approve th a modification to Conditional '.lse Permit 0,7 -P�5 th" ugh adoption of Vtt attached Resolution. Res t 1 d, C es 8r ; Bul City nne 88 ::'N:ko tcachment_: Exhibit "A" - Lextet From the Applicant .Exhibit "B" - Original Site Plan Exhibit "CO - Revised Site Plan Resolution of Approval 1 y 'F U f i I M DEC I2 ' {��9a16ti1�L��1g2 t�.t Scats Murphy, Ass -.ate Planner Planning Deprur+..w —r- City of Rancho Cucamon; a P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamo,�ga, CA 91730 Re: Thomas Winery Plaza Rancho Cucamonga, CA Dear Scott: I hope we have a chance to meet one ci these days. I'herawith request deletion of BuiiAing J from our site plan as attached to the Conditional Use Perntt. #87 -26, The reason for deleting the building Xs that we have found a tenant for the Vinery 'juilding (an Italian Restaurant) and in n °der for uc to stay is confa:;aance with the Cit 's parking repintio"s, see have to reduce the square footage in the center We will aaso be changing the foutp,'°iat of Building D. I will let you know about that as soon ar. we havo a first = wttment from the tenant. If you have any questions or comments, please don't her, .zate to call. Very tmly yours, s�X OA TORS;r " ¢' Rudy 8tr T Project Manager RB:mg L3 2081 Business Center Drive O Suite 290 c3 4rvIne. CA 927 15 o 17 t 4) 833 -7700 - -- H. WN ,; I r .,lam 1f1 rTW7-T--f �' T -1-1 i I u r t}y `16 � e t t > 1, 1!'�I! Imo, 1 s• N � e a all if oil { `ti _ 3 Itp —^i4 r t 1 1 RESOLUTION NO, 88 -17B A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCh'O CUCANON%sA PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RMCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -28 T(� DEL,`TE OUILDING "J" WITHIN A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SHOPPr4G CENTER FOOTHILL W BOULEVARD ANDD VINEYARD NAVENUE AND R MAKING FINDINGS I:i 5UPPOW' THEREOF - AKIN: 208- 101 -10 AND 11 A. Recitals. Conditional } Jse OAS Investors 87 -�er4 an s described Qnin for the mod'fication to fa this Re54 Ution. Pereirafter in :his Resolution the subject trodifica4rion to the Cond•ttio;;al t'se Permit r ques° is riferred to as "the °ppl I cation", (ii) On the 11th of Jan +xary, 1989, the Planning Cornmissioil 0f -'re City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing 0n the application and concluded said hearing on that date. {iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this !iosoiution have occurred. 8. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detamIi,>d and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City o? Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Cowission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are tree and correct. 2. Based wren substantial evidence presented to this 11, 1989, including Commission during the above - referenced public hearing :n January written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The proposed deletion of Wilding V will not deviate from the previous findings as contained in Resoluticn bb. 88-17. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comission during the above- referenced public hearing &nd upon, the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Com. hereby finds and cenclvdes as follows: AL s , PLANNING COMMISSION RWiLOTION NO. 88 -176 RE: CUP 87 -26 - OAS IWESTORS January 11, 1989 Page 2 (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 1b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That th_ proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project hz been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this CoiaRission issued a Negative Declaration on January 27, 1988. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby modifies Conditional Use Permit 87 -26 by deleting Building "J" and redesigning the -area of deletion for additional parking, and Adding the folluwi'p,, conditiWn: Plac:ning Divisions (34) Add a shrub planter an the north side of tha existing winery (Bui %ding "K ") at the end of circulation aisle and sod ta,ee wells to the hardsr4pe area west of tre still building. Revised Landscape and Irrigatio,,► Plans :hall be submitted fu review and approval prior to issuance of any building permits for tenant improvements in said building, n 6. The Secretary ro this Commission shall certiiy to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11T11 DAY GF JANUARY, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF WE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMiONGA BY: Larry e , Chairman ATTEST: --Brad Swer, Secretary 13 Ell PLANNIPS LOMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88 -178 RE: CUP 87-26 - OAS INVESTORS,. January 11, 1989 Page 3 If l -, I, Brad Bullet,, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the .oregoing,Resolu%ion was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucumonga,.at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held. 4 on the 11th day of January, 1989, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: 'COMMISSIONERS: NOES: POMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REFO RT DATE: January 11, 1989 TO' 0at!'man and Members of the Flanning Commission FROM: Brad Boller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE 88 -25 - KEN RUBY CLNSTRJCTION COMPAW - A request to allow En -s gi ng s ao ar s to exceed the 15 foot height requirement for a proposed shopping center in the Community Commrcial District located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue - APN: 208-301-15, 15, 17. RELATED FILE: CLIP 85 -19 I. A84,16. -XT: The ap( = -tnt is requesting a Variance from `.hi 1W%— eT5pment Code Regulation of Parking Lot Lighting (Section 17.12.030A.8). This section limits light standards to 15 feet in overall height from finished grade. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan does not address height of light standards; therefore, the Development Cade Standards would apply. II. ANALYSIS, A. C=eral: The intent of the alight restriction of :5 feet is to rANTROn light standards in a low profile design and to be compatible with architectural design. The 15 fo=rt height limit also minimizes adverse effects of lijhting or adjacent properties, particularly residential vies. Functionally, maintaining a 15 foot height limit ailtws trees to grain to a mature height above the light, leaving the light source to =pine below the tree canopy (see :Exhibit "D "). The applicant has provided some aesthetic and functional reasons war such a variance would be justified within the project, Plaza De Las Brisas {oee Exhibit "6 "). The applicant proposes % raise the -tight standards within the parking lot area to ZO or 25 feet in height. According to the applicant, the main reason behind tLe proposed height increase is to veMce the amount of 914re for motorists 11 along Fo,t`thill Boulevard. The applicant outlines this and other factors related to the 15 foot Neigh* limit: ITEI1t M PLANNING COWISSI'ON STAFF REPORT VA 88 -26 - Ken Ruby Construction Company January 11, 1989 Page 2 11 o Rue to the downslope nature of this project, a "hot spot" will be created near the line of sight of motorists entering the project from Foothill Boulevard. o A more even distribution of light can be created by higher e-'- vation liq ting poles. a The canopy of light created is ao log it obscures visibility of -the project (i.e„ sig .). o Lower energy consumption can be achieved by raising the height limitation of lighting poles (i.e, fewer poles, less energy consumption). It is the opinion of staff that the difference in grade between Foothill P,nulevard and the project site is not great enough to justify a variance for this site. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Development Code gives the Planning —Commission the autAority to approve a variance for a development standard when special circumstances apply to the project, and the ft0 owing findings can be met: a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. b) rat there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforca'ment of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zona. d) That the granting or the variance will not constitt,.e a great of special privilege inconsistent with the limitatiuis on other properties classified in the same zone. e) That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public tealt"h, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to prop;�rtfes or improvements in the vicinit,. It is the opinion of staff that the necessary findings to support granting this variance cannot be made. The intent of tte Code to require 15 foot light standards is that light':.g is directed below PLANNING CftISSION STAFF MOT VA 88 -26 Ken Ruby Construction Company danuary 11, 1989 Page 3 i tree ca, cpfes and is intensad to maintain ilium; nation one -site without effect on adjacent properties or pa.;sing motorists. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Tats item has been advertised as a, public hearing in The a`�, .X ReRort newsp;- ,ar and rl l properties owners within 300 fleet of the project. site have haen notified. In addition,, pW is hearing notices have �een Xosted on the Subject property.. V. RECuMENbMOW i!"sed on staff'3 opinion that not enough evidence i.aaS been prov dec' o Justify this variance, star recommends, that the M dnning Comm,ssion ateny Variance 88 -26 through adoption of the aczached Resolution.. Re c utly su ed, cry 'bra e city P annzr BB:SH :vC Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Variance Justification By Applicant Exhibit "C" - Proposed light Standard Designs Exhibit "D" - Light Standard witi Tree Resolution of Denial 1 I IS H 0 P P i N6 �CI N f R RANC110 CUCAMONGA, I CALIrOR'"IA Lli r ' 3 3 ^4 I 2 7 -0 2 -C 2 -f 2.0 2 -N SV 3 -a L42 MY" 2.0 2 t -T b i`3' iii .Y3 rii UI i.'i- i.i .'ii tii c'.ii %W W, W Lob .g 1-A r � to a.an 1st V ' ie 0 3 t -CIF H M-LLLniWlMqL 1 — — r FOOT H I LL BLVD . [CITY OF ITEM: —Vgt-,&Kga, MRL R"'LANNING DIVISION 1-� "L ExI;IEIT:: ' SCALE: '" KEN RUBY iCONMUSTIOM CO. December 7, 1988 Planning Bapattment CITY OF RANCHO CUCM02 -'iA 9820 Baseline Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Plaza de Las Brisas SWC Foothill Blvd. & Ramona Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA CUP- 85-19 Gentlemen: Enclosed is our Variance Application package which we are submitting for your review and action for a modification to the development code as it relates to retail/commercial parking lot illumination. Following, is what wo„ believe to he adequate juetification for your review of the current standards as they apply to this p�:ject in particular and to future pvojeots of similar design a, d topography. Ammm ct- l The current requirement for use of 15t high light fixtures is somewhat limiting from an ar^hitectural desi:3n stand point and definitely rot ideal froru a design application of good lighting standards for parking i -ta. The use of hicr�er =-evacion ligh'4ing pules will provide a more even die ;r. :,ution of light -ever a greater area parking surtaco with the uss of thm fewest -number poles, while at the same time elimsnatirg or greatly reducing the excess glare produced by a fixture of similar output at a lesser elevation and greater gaan,i,ty. Lessening the glare is of impoxtance in this I ^r^sicular instance due to the dow:a slope naturs of the = .:oject and the adverse Effect that the glare will hw�jz nv, motorists enteking the project. The practicai effect or placing the "hot spot" of the fixture It or naar the line of Eight of motorists enteririq t.':a nxoj;�ct from FootW ` � Boc.tev7lrd is to provide a sr.arce of distraction for the .ye at a crucial momont vhen full attention should be dirPcv..dt at safely e.tirati.�I r. major vehicles arterial roadway while crossing a ' -ublic right of way. 11845 W6tOhmpx Blvd •Bode 1200. West %tier •LosAnq&M CA 9f106+ •213/312.8503 NING DYE' " _ON H -C; V!,_��. 0 _-02 off- 11-89 PC Aq nda o of !, I Plbsnsing Department CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 7, 1988 Argument #3 There is of course the savings in initial cost as demonstrated in the attached schedules. This lower initial cost factor has the effect of allowing developers like ourselves to hold down the total cost of project development thus making the finished product more attractive to potential tenants which in turn makes the project profitable for the developer and tho city alike. 'thank you for your consideratinn of this .Ia::.iance request and should you have any additional questjt: -�tE phase feel gab free to contact me. Very truly yours, KEN IWBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Dennis E. Dickenson Project Manage: DEDjks Encla, OF JTEW:-y Fir.. € s�?r' '�y'�q'►4 m;� �i.. ee'sr'..+:2$` " ,� �rggp w� �.+-� Mel tit ®!6 i OTF UIT M — 1 warsamwasc // P%14 FcM Ton Ssmi-$Om Ane and Wa4 Mount —MA/MW The Form Taft reis dcvne- f4W.cylfnddWcut -of lumSnalm. Its softersilhouette lends iL IN to Inieyraticn wAhcurvinp erchit6etural struelurn or may be twofultytrsed tottcavide an interest ing counter➢o�1t to sharply defined �fi1�75f ttn!ra. Bath 3amfSpheru ^nd Round luminaires rwr. ha We (MA/CA) or will (MW /CV1) ;.1ounted. MA 17 2 3 120175W, SAP .�l 1111710120176MA R" Cnbarfna tntomw1on Prefia Stns ConttQnrmlm Aslleckx Smotst Limps Finish MA 17' 1.2.4 1.$.VO.FM 12044 70.17SW BRA.BLA.BRP.BLP.NP VA 22' 1.2.4 1.3.VQ.VB.FM 1204W 250400W SRA.BLA.Btki?BLPNP MW 17' 1 1AFM 1211.480 10.175W BRA.BLA.BRRBLP,NP MIN 22' 1 113.FM 1204W 25C-MM BRAILAAMBLP.MP SAA-BroutaAnodim SLA- BL•tt Antic i2. , BtiFasrom Pair.?W. St.P -81ack PainMd. kFaksolralpq ft& I. nANCHO A,-, VI -- H,q ri ITEM, �lw..1�C mrwm cr e q$ N-. aai�8.rs� - 111 �t J 2C�Zlit 5J•" x7rt� JJ 4 y 2 CAT Y OF ITEM: �a'; a. C.0- a 0 RANCHO L t,d "V M N TITLE: Li; k t 6 Ed; nee. PLANNINf,2 DIVISION,_ RES011 rION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE R1i1CH0 CUCAMONEA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYIK6 VARIANCE NR ., . 88-6 TO ALLOW 044ITE LIONTIN+3 STANDARDS TO EXCEED '14 15 FOOT HEIGHT" REQUIREMENT FOR A PROPOSED SHOOING CENTER IN THE COMMUNITY C"9RCIAL DISTRICT, LfJCArED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND RAM04A AVENUE, AND MING FINDINGS IN ,qJPPORT THEREOF - APk 208- 301 -16, iS, 17. A. Recitals. (1) Ken Ruby Constrr tion COMPany has filed an application for the issuance of the Variance Ho. 88 -26 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinatter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is, referred to as "the application". (ii} On January 11, 1989, the Manning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a (Uly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearinc nn that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. Now, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of gancho Cuca%4nga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on January It, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, ioget" r with public testimony, this Comaission hereby specifca:ly €inds as follows - (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue with a sweet frontage of 775.66 feat and lot iepth of 279.95 feet., and (b) The variance request is spccificaliy iFor Ne use of 20 -26 foot light standards within park rig areas; and T prope f t rty to the north of subject site is conmrcial %retail, the property to the south of that site consists of single family residences, the property to the east is residential, and the 7roperty im the west is commerci4l; and a i PLAWNING COMISSION RE50LUTION NO. VA 38:,26 Ken Ruby Cc•istruction Company January 11, 1989 Page 2 (d) The intent of the Code to require 15 foot light standards is not effected by site slope, size or design and is a ,utter of functilon. . The 15 foot height was determined to be an appropriate height to provide lighting under the canopy of nature trees and also to restrict the iliunination to this parcel and avoid adverse effects on adjacent properties. 3. Based ups' the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- refr.,-enced' public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth it paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as folh:tea: (a) That there are aot excepti:�nal or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property invoived or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. (b) That strict or literal interpretation and enfo —ne —mn* of the specified Yegulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same dist?'z�t. (c) That the granting of the Variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in tl;e same district. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of tyis Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JAWARY, 1989. PLANNING COW.ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary LA [A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIOM NO. 1<' VA 88 -26 - Ken Ruby Construction Company Jaguar 11, 19:9 Alk 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do: hereby certify that the foregoing Resolvtion was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plonriing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of thr ?'taming Commission held on the 11th dal of January, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CC;Pg+IiSSIoNERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: -- Ci'%T OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, STAFF REPORT DATE- January 11, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Plann_r � ! 3 1977 BY: Bruce Abbott,. Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -37 UTMAN- MACDONALD & PARTNERS - The development of a o -s ory 26,265 square foot off1ce building on 7.09 acres of land in the Haven Aver;ue Overlay District (Subarea 6), located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street - APH: 209 - 401 -01. 1. BACKGI�NND: On December 14, 1988, the Planning Commission reviewed et�si °t'�n and elevations for the proposed office building. The proposed building elevations and the site plan were essentially the same as was previously approved in 1986,. The applicants ware trying to achieve an architectural style that would be compatible with the existing buildings on the site. W,,, -ver, Planning Commission felt that the exterior walls facing Haven Avenue should be upgraded as a result of their prominent position. It was felt that the proposed building was not consistent with the design goa's for the- Haven Avenue Overlay District. Further, it was requested that the building walls receive more articulation as well as surface texture changes. II. ANALYSIS: The applicant and staff reviewed plans for the proposed oofficee'bui ?ding focusing on design solutions which would optimize opportunities, to upgrade the facade for compatibility to Haven Avenue and exiting site constro nts. Th,^ applicant has revised the building elevations to provide ,Ta office building wnich is more consistent with the intent for an "office park" type develop: ent associated with the Haven ,Avenue Overlay District. The building will still offer some elements whicA will tie in with the other existing buildings on the site. The Design Review Committee (McNeil, Tol;stoy, and Coleman) reviewed the proposed plans for the office buil&ing on January 5, 1989 and recommended that revised plans be resu!mitted for additional review prior to consideration by the Planning Commission. The plans should include the following: 1. Additional glass should be provided at the southwest corner of the building to give the building more of an office.appearance. ITUI N PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 88 -37 - UTMAN- MCDONALD b PA.RTNCRS January 11, 1988 Page 2 2. The roof equipment screening should be designed to emulate the appearance of the tilt -up walls used on the building. IiI. ReCOM ENOATION; Staff recomnds that the Planning Commission ttt con inue`f -s—S item for 2 weeks to allow the applicant to revise the Plans for additional review by the Design Review, Committee. Respectfully submitted, � grad Bu'ler City Planner BB: BA:js' Attachments; Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report (December 14, 19881 P ..-- --- CITY OF RANCHO CUC_,kMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 14, 1993 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westsmsn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVEL%%EHT REVIEW Be-37 - e development of a two- story zo,255 square foot off-ice building on 7.09 acres of land in the Haven Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6) ji..'atA_a at the northeast corner of Maven Avenue and /facia Street - APH: 209 - 401 -01. I, PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of architectural el.avations and site plan. B. Surrounding !and Use and Zoning: Borth - vacant, railryad tracks; Industrial Aare District (Subarea 6), Haven Overlay District South - Office building; Industrial Park District (Subarea 6), Haven Overlay District East - Warehouse /distribution building; Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) West - Vacant; Industrial Park District (Subarea 6), Haven• Overlay District C. General Plan Designations: lsojez - 153ustrial rk, Haven Avenue Overlay District !kxi� - Industrial Park, Haven Avenue Overlay District Sough - Industrial Park, Vnven Avenue Overlay District East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park, Vaven Avenue Overlay District D. Site Characteristics: The site is currently developed aiti3 tc- ,*o o ce u - non ndustriez buildings. All on -site and off4 site improveaments have been completed. A vacant pad exists where the intended office building s to be constructed. .: f PLANNING COIwMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 18-37 - Utman- ftDonald and rsrtners December 114, 1988 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type S care Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage PAVO Required Provided Office 26,265 1/250 IDs 105 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: This project was previously eppro,eed in 1986; 7 over, building .permits expired on the building as 'sell as ,c Planning Commission approval. Therefore the applicant was raquired to resubmit for a oew aprroval on the project. Neither building elevat!ons nor site plan have changed. The propose' use is- consist"at with the goals of the Vaven Avenue. Overlay District and with surrounding uses. B. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the projJect and made tfie o ow ng recommendations: 1. Existing overhead utilities: a. The ex "sting overhead utilities (cormtMcations for 66 KY electrical) along the project's north boundary should be undergrounded from the first pale on the west side *f Haven Avenue to the first pole off -site east of the project's east boundary, prior to public improvenesit acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer !may request a reimbursement agreez*nt to Ywovor one -half t.ke (ikv ndoptad cast for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. b. M in -lieu f% as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (railroad telecommunication lines) on the project side of the ATBSF Rail-nad should be paid to tha City prior to the issuance rfr building permits.. The fee shall be the full adopted unit amount tires the length from the center of Haven Avenue to the, cast project boundary. The developer way request a reimbursement agreement to receive one -half this adopted cost for future development (redevelopment) as it occurs or the north side of the AUSF Railroad. JU IE 0 PLAW4ING COMIS5WN STAF€' REPORT OR 88 -37 - Utman- McDonald and partners Decerber 14, 1988 Page 3 These tonditions are being recommended at this time because the undergrounding policies have changed since the original approval of this project and were not included in the original approval. C. Design Review Comwittee: The Committee (Emerick, 'Biel, Coleman ) reviewed ft— project on November 17. 1988 and reco rnded approval to the Planning Coomission. Although the Committee felt that the painUd concrete tilt -up material proposed "or the building was not consistent with the desired style for Haven Avenue, it was agreed that the materials were appropriate in order to maintain a consistency with the three existing buildings. D. Environmental Assessment: A Negative Declaration was issued �` c project under Its original approval on May 14, 1986. Therefore, additional action is not required. III. FVTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is coAsistent with the Ge-reral an an ven Avenue Overlay District. The building design and site plan together with the recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with the Maven Avenue Overlay District. The project will not be detrimental to the health,, sai`ety, lfare, or materially injurious to surrounding propertiar, Iii:. REC"F.NDAiION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission anorova ve o5ment Review 68 -37, Brad 9u11 r City Ala nee° 9B:CM.vd AttaG rents: Exhibit "A" Location PAP Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "CO - i i tvations Resolution of Approval w4th Conditions CMMILATION 120' R.a.W. ..ommom 1 00' R.O.W. --•— 8S' or Was R.O.W. RAIL SERVtCE -- f-t-++ Existing Proposed TRAILS IRCUTES 0000 Pedestrian 0000 Bicycle =d Regional �F Mi,ttl -Use ^- Specls5 Stroetsoape/ Landscaping Power Lino/ - Utility Easement ,.. -•••� Crooks S Channels Bridge! Access Points '.� 'Park Firer Station 3 G -k- 0 400 800 ,600 [I. El T1 12 cis, NOR CITY OF ^L7!"\ !T TP'r' a �a �.,�.� , .tee--- - �✓ V I , t_.CA',VI j. N 7th: T(rLt .. ,. ri.Au`v;Vti G IN'L5TC7s"�i EXH1BM SCALE-- � E., 1_' I -AL.A S CITY OF ITEN-1- a M R -A INIC-1-10 CTUCATMONGA --ff A*lr,'Ai I 6- P"NMINNG DIVI=4 Ex.H.,Brr. NORTH ll d7w7 :� � X ®��• • ,. i( f N1 1 -lrwik -� ( r♦ � .'�}p'!�-7.� I�{ �01��� ,mac �s \1i It• •��s7ffi t .3E .,.. ; o e s,.tf/: "�rllslrl��l�►� a 7,.a1R ', '+t.� * �- ti'�,�,/ ii � T!4 ��� +►1_l�ilwr�IgT�1 m CITY OF 11A,NCITO CUCAMONGA ST'AF'F REPORT DATE: January 11, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller,, City Planner BY: Steven Hayes, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: EINIRONMENTAL ASSES94ENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -29 - . 10. a M eve opmen�4 an a.. .ce building total 197 square feet on 2.34 acres of land in the Industrial 'Park District (St&area 12) located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue apd 5th Street - APP; 229441-10. I. PROJECT Aku SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requuc.ted: Approval of site ttan, grading, and bcilding e et' °: onx, stn ssuance of Negative Declarat -4_ B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin ;r ces In us "aT lea Specific Plan Subarea 12 (Indus *,�^ial Park) "'outh - Vacant; Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 12 (Ind!,strQ' - 15ark) East Vacant; Industrial Area Specific Plan Stwarea 12 (Industrial Park) Nest' - Vacant; Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 12 (Industrial Park) C. General plan D�es�iiggt__,__ations: ro ec `�TI�dust"r�'ai"Paric North Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Industrial park K)st m Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The site is presently improj:ed with cuT g'; erg"",: `sT9ew&lk, otinage facilities, and parkway landscaping. go sign ificant native vegetation or structures exist on -site. ITEM 0 PLANNING C11-M'-SSIOMSTArF REPORT DR 88-21 - CASTILLO COMPANY, INC. January i1, 1989 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Office and Admin. 15,107 1/250 61 112 Total Si" Tly 11. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicait is requesting approval for new cons ruction of an office building and a claims garage area for an automobile insurance company totaling 15,10, sqwire feet. The project is within the Bixby Business PL(rk, whichs was approved as a %1ster Plan by the Planning Commission on September 24, 1936 ME 8G-09). The curreat r eP4 0 is consistent with the approved Bixby Business Park M?- Plan and Dosign Guid0ines. B. Desiv Review Comittee: On Hov(4nber 17, 1988, the Comittee IRMO, Emerick. =de,-r5) reviewed the project and recommended revisions. The following lssue`s were discussed: 1. Substantial and secured furniture and a trellis structure with Ines should be included in the employee lunch area. 2. The i"n,, ;should bn moved 5 feet. to the west in order to IW� ylmte;!, area large enough for trees along the eastam ,es. of the main building and claims garage, 3. Provide an ,Aoriched texture treatment to the visitor parking spaces. 4. Include trees between the theme walls to make the m,*In entrance a focal point". S. Yncorporate a screen hedge from the stluthwest corner of the building south to the parking area. r,,e Design Review Committee (Tolstoy, Zoerick, Coleman) reviewed rev1=41 plans and recommended approval at its December 8, 1988 meeting, subject to the following ' conditions: 1. The landscaped planters an the east side of the buildin4- should include columnar evergreen trees, such as Hollywood,,,, Junipers or Yew Pines. IM PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF WWI DR 88 -29 - CASTILLO CORPANY, INC. January 11, 1989 Page 3 2. Provide enriched paving treatment to wie visitor parking sp., ;es and parking lot entrances such as - or4rete pavers `th inter -mixed banding similar to the sidewalk treatment. s. Provide additional detail to the employee lunch area (i.e., furniture used, number of seats prov4ded versus intployeos, etd . D. 12chnical Review Comm ttee: On November 15, 1988, the mm ttee revi ewi—ad a pro ect and determined tb t, with the recommended Standard Condjtions of Approval, the project is consistent wit.% all applicable standards and ordioahnes. iho Gracing Committee conceptually approved. the project at its meeting on Nnveinber 14, 1988. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been comp.e erT5y the applicant. Staff has completed Past II of th Environmental Charklist and found no significant adverse envirowniental impacts as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with staff findings, the issuance of a Negative Declaration tinuld be in *order. III. RECD ENDATION: Staff recommends approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration for Lit'. 88 -29 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Res u' ?y pitted, 1 ad B e Ci anner BB :SH:mlg Attacianents: Exhibit "A" Site Utilization Exhibit "B" a Detailed Site Alan Exhibit "C" - Landscape °lan Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Detailed Elevations of Outdoor Eating Area and Main Entry Resolution of Approval �J CITY OF RANCHO UNNA ?PLANNING DIVISION 0 `q W w W i Original Buir Quality CffY OF R �TC 0 CUT A PLANNING DIVISION t R7Afit +c�OM �RAYOR m�m�aea.�te nn r� w. rua��re w.ye'i' �f NOR U R ITEM% DR 't-2,q TITLE.. EXHIBIT_ 13 Original Poor QualitY 112 FLM rr 011 MOE 'L {'Inelppf 40� 1 NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION 0 -G Original Poor Quality EXMT VIWARD5 leer r rnlirenl rweeso{ruarwe mearra..r $401�1.a .tar= M �1 J'�WIIWA W� !AIL ✓� .. N�� � I 11, - •!{I Y{ { n SOUln WZVATWW iric-9 )riginal PCor Qualit, Lz F-ml, mom mm/fim ■ CITY OF CUcaAMoj,;,GA PUMNING DIVISION () 4 �llzxd- FARN a ad fp u n A 0 1 e, r" w` ; sr 1. 5 Mai ITEM: DR ?1-21 TITLE. . _0 %A �11 AiV%49 'hj49VoK+iomj EXHIBIT: 19"" 11 Original f"�dar Quality Effff L=mamn OF ITEM: OR v.:z �PW-TCHO CUCAMONGA -,f mu: ocht ilat ig®,►�, Amdk 110id moq�a eft+a-Y PLANNING DIVISION 0-9 EXHIBIT: 'T"* SCALZ -�- 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANMtING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N9. 88 -29, FOR AN OFFICE BUILDING TOTALING 155,107 SQUARE FEET ON 2.34 ACRES OF LAND IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 12): LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND aTH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IP. SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229- 341-10 A. Recitals. [i3 The Castillo Co%pany, Inc. has filed an application for the approval of Development Review to, 88 -29 as described in the tide of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the arpl' cation ". (ii) on the 11th of vanuary 1969, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All lesal° prereq,jisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: S. This Comaiss,:n hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidenct, presented to this Comission during the above- referenced meeting on January 11, 1989, ificluding written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (G3 The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Milliken and Sth Street with a street frontage of 591.85 feet and lot depth of 304.93 feet and is presently Improved with sidewalk, curb, gutter, ant parkway landscapings a- W The property to the north of the subject site is offices, the property to the south of that site consists of vacant land, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is vacant. (c) The property is located within the Bixby Business Park Master Plan and subject to its Design C- uidelines. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Comission hereby finds and concludes as follows. 0-'16 PLANNING COMISSION R €5OLUTIUN NO. OR 88 -29 - CASTILLO COMPANY January 11, 1989 Page 2 El (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of t�he Development Code and Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (t) That the proposed use is In compliance with each of the applicr,)le provisions of the Development Code and Industrial Specific Plan; and (d) That ther proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety o- welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements In the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs-; 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached. Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division, 1. Tha landscaped planters•aiong the east side of the building shall incorporate colssanar evergreen trees, such as Hollywood Junipers or few Pines. 2. Provide Enriched paving treatment to the visitor parking spaces and parking lot entrances, such as concre pavers with inter -mixed banding similar to the sidewalk treatment. 3. Provide additional detail for the employee lunch area (i.e., furniture used, number of seats provided versus employees, etc.). Engineering Division: 1. A contribution in aid of the installation of landscaping and irrigati;in for the median island within Milliken Avenue shalt be paid to the City prior ;$o issuance of building permits. The amount shall be one -half the unit cost; times the length of the project frontage. 0-11 PLANNING CISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 88 -9 - CASTILLO COMPANY January 11, 1969 Page 3 0 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUNRY, 1989.. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCC,:iONGA BY: Larry T. Mc , Chairman ATTEST: rad Buller, SVcretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cowission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the Ilth day of January, 1989, by the following vote -to -wit- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSI'JNSRS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: •t~ 2 n4�LY G�i.{L Nt qqO pfp p pp G Ti �'•' Urii Y: wQA wCP +may 040) dw�iNJ�� � `�`,�wa ¢'o¢. K.• -u��A �.yy.° �i q$���. Nye ®s�o.a. Q����L�Nft�N .N�Y� LN • 0.y 4Y wCw rr° qCY� t1 �i O C ~ CM 01w� 'C,M Srr�Y�N� GOw yOti�4N A�.Y OY�a+Yj fit 4 Y l ti r m G it O M C b u g °1 V� a ~ L r• r� Y Imp «a''YA °aiYy "�y z3 EM'S W^S f.d EM'.O 3gY"PK oE q oc fro +'3 wgzl � � G F�jV� q .141y_� 4S��IB CI aYi� � rPC�yO Y Gp ids °�=dY ^+r arM.7 v-� �,CY qr, y�iYLL.� Ny ■�pjpQ � � >4� 4�i N4 y:Yi��Y�Q (��epY�9�p,N O.gtii p4. �. C��+6T ■. M �Y= i-S "83.2 GOr�f � {fit 9wMl�l �aY s�Y O�O�Y+t yT/+aK lfw _ K. :Cp^ L'oa� @ @�@�oQa'. ni i sic 0 "oM wcw� 111. YNY YV 3 UYM O. YG i C y. M ;i > yN RUES y =a ^�Ng 4 `LN CKCVV Gyyyy Mu, pq Ed! 51 Ca sixtrup OV �woOYa VGGGGy9Yy0 {4. R Y`'C _w�igK NY fM.Y >�- Yyt p� Y�00 a V A p�.= M i � 5r � 4,d.G M ��M K� �M � O �� Yom• r 0 V Y6H 4 I � I V �N �M��Yy • • ,ayWh C Y D. {. yS �. C a S q w,t i Y9Y A' W �b ®CS.V� ci s M 6 qq A Ain EEO -9 W kx lJ y{ yx- a q�{isS caSY� h y5 r qo. w NY�3 �y�py��jY1�� •• N i s 6 : E -H K 4 1Ri x yZtf� M tZ- a El 11 6~d W 9 a a • 3 �Y9 V A�x YrC w � L�r co= R b L N +up N c -.TL C O A m o C � N A � L° W b YL Br�l �l 66° c L' C L� + U C 3" Y N sopza 6� y Cw1Y N � L aybw Y A YY cc � Ly tl � ma p M« L u L�n'w i Y`1p Me MO yP =LI 6 w {{11 _♦ y3F A J g Y }�M s+ j ;�✓Lp�I t11M� KQ^ QQp �lil CS.wm.. �c��ayyayc COY n. w�N41M DA VjRll.. y-1wp �V� Yii> �1I0 as" ESS-5 08 !TM iy+ p OL CMS O T�i��imy 9 CHI I NN «w'� �CMh �trl" !1:13b a MA l ��pe�e ^i O lgiPly;;I A C V p O L W O a 5— liltrM4 Zv- b « 4 qqN Au V c 0O^z� MNsCA `Y AU, �Aw M 1. � • � aw.� N_r {Y�� lip: 1 « � �.-1 =�A" 3 ^ A W 3y A y } SM �N Vyywy�� 6 A'LB qN _{C{p���V#. �u11 1n , 1, VL�sD r.+ +{��pps 1C4Atls CGUM S+ VSb` U.t pig ■ L J Y ppJ+ C A C V p O L W O a 5— `Y AU, �Aw M 1. � • � aw.� N_r {Y�� « � -5 =�A" 3 ^ A W as O N A y } SM �N in N Vyywy�� 6 A'LB qN _{C{p���V#. �u11 1n , y}Y ® VL�sD r.+ +{��pps 1C4Atls CGUM S+ VSb` 4 (� Ii7ty Si M N. A ate^ Q -I�t ON X96 w� °s «ML p � L T n s CLs� {L mOgw F��i`e% i B= "4 u $ 'j Y gu gm f W 3 A Ly N N G NM��Y N� if ��pp Cl Fl R p� N Y A a q � 0 TQQ V �Tpp l�S� N Original Qquaiity ui i'�yQ Vu' s!��� o�M4 °^9i ffJJ '". °+ wren 3vY a+x w «.. �uY c .i CY AQH p�I 6LY °N .V� y�t OM� TfLy�`CQ` " �►�lP� L°«�•' 'rs. � V y r s 6 "`c ujry i AS .c° v�1Nyti Ny ifk «yp + PYM � sYw� G.� -Riiop Sol ;N �C rr1 «y ST C.- _C 'y y+'rY 11i U�.C. pLy NN~rr ^ S ' W 1 4 4� w. tiQbp MO u�L�{4 CN Lit ��Er` ^[y,� k y {Lq ^±q��i i.y''p• a�� :r DrOQQQ.oyj$_ Np CC yr"yQjrNHAq; ° ^L `o y,„ " m 1 cw CNC °l 8 e r*'■°' � YS Ne p CK9 Cb ri,� 010 T. N 16AON rM.� + P.-A �N t�Lq,Cw {p �yV yfl ZM'k1 H 'Q a4 If tx JS. aN ay q^S{stAiH `¢# e4: V�v NtN +N 4'a.o. Ka swo WN.R its UrY. r"�ai'. a+r M'6'�i' t"w a. �u WSwa. yi E o Z a 4?c �'iri a 9r°.9 e, "�' AS OR r. n" tS 4-C � CF w ;Z a +� na �-of. yy NMw4 G b h `4 'y�. 4 t zn U U 4,�C � « b sn M ft �rnq ��•I+.�i �N? 'Y Ri 1'C U �a ry .. � �y 4y N V 6rrV� MVO.. # Hwnar v^ w yy leg-a' ciQ. iTfw �~ c+A ppM TN "4w.AQ.� i, NL �CVV yi�1 Y¢S q.S�.s� gNY".Wii 1 X Y v Ni +N x..33 c° ro tk+- `=qyy�� i� V qw�r yQV 4N Wt�~�/. YV r°w fiYD �wY N C V��4 MtsNe 4`RYti Q.—ft rE4 Mai t[n iY x v.+rFbw M Original Pwr Quali,y olrCd Oli. ^LR �.IGC dT Yt�Jµ VCt �3yC �_`�CMyy~qi��u V6�%G 4Y Lv C 0.0. UfyyLj wU S4� Obb i v i W 9 C =vq W�° IPao �'«`�x° ;u Laws $ i Nits W CqN fw � y ! w YN zp ffl LwVt «RMV�V V L GA's` M.M.cWwy Mld br J�v Yq �aG ..��f�ffp������° V�q4' N„T yL {N�Y �ti EC d W b a d C. V C y+ . 0 4 � Q L p V iW Oil �. 4 p 7 g ti a w rN �4w sO,r�� LN �yy SG9� a. 4 •s +.°. ,GY F""�•f�i •� Y NL �ayVj Z1 u e'd G �p a1 �s.vra",I f"y •« .,, js�+Lq+' a.OpA 1gNy.{�S3S .��lt >* w(S 4 w {t Y TCM M y 1f6 Md N L ~ V t4t�Fy j Np. �;J N G•r !VM.n, y f� u yV 'L w N�R~ M TN lzu-_Qiuita G^' U Qi M N,G 4 G# W +Y�r Y�Q ^,•�. "W'UN �6 �Y� • T N'^G. $r'. .w s.`i.�. '. c $. y� -` q:&E,zr- R.'" p' a°� NY f'YmN 0.R yR R.6 pV I=A . 1^eri �.wp bfp01 'L 9`YEC LL` RV yN CAL V kt!4�F+ Y.« 0.. C . Yy�ri y..��y/9 .�Oj ty�+. nV.2 u C leg F!$i'ro FKfi� iLlti VfP�4! � � UVVV� �0�6�WN yw.afOA H h WV� 4 ! 1�1 C4 0— Ust N .N -'�.vf ": ;e * a .$� b,#,°� pu. am, e' 'SM yH Y G N � wy y q 0. b ✓ C Ili 1� tj A i !IF V N q a O 6 `OO N G W -is m L* C M 6y ! 14! —To N .Yi ..vi, ii k „O G M Y p M 'p$ '�.ryJ' .-9 jig vs +yv�wp O Lam. 4 J N- at V �y Wg ti P9 dch "+'4 en # 3 a.• ; 4N R -�. ■gip. N4 �fWw #Naf GL 4 # 3w Ot A M N lfyfVC cyN~i yp y3nil 9 YNNyp w IyLJ= CitfrY rt MCpy '�n.e yyw � yq� �fV W�?�4Qp +1:, ■Vy 51Mu Nw rI L4, 4YN �MT _L w� MYV. is MO 1�p' Nii 4.1� M :: Z_ .Jlj_ i i"_lr 4'4� Q NT V L. RS CA a? C + C r r G i N' 9i Y Zj Y� Gi Cp �1C Ny0 pS Ki @ A N~ Nam(��f N4 �S WNyJ LN/y� �6 LY 1+) f C t i t�I ti g °O o a g °`. 3 E c G L No - a OI Y L y V u� ■S� SO YQ+r w,°,r.� Y.o M +Y� uRf:; O �a s'•C' � 5'. A N to w e 1: u i 'r' g O Y a V —se i w YY C « a'.�LN WO ap°I�V big v �4y C y_yY acww�fyy�1 SO:u.Gp. :r V -S NN�$Q1.y Y Y�� W m�V d KOVVO GI0 lu CA a? C + C r r G i N' 9i Y Zj Y� Gi Cp �1C Ny0 pS Ki @ A N~ Nam(��f N4 �S WNyJ LN/y� �6 LY 1+) f C t i t�I ti N h a 4 iq- r b iliaa N s YONp a +� c�aV `o "a A co M O 6 L� Wu C b i-1 a b� 1�lI QI 1!1 +O t I t 1 :callti $�1 A a O 9 {Y� qMy 40� CO�Y Iris 3q. C.M' G `O Y 3y4�4 aYG �pp�1Na 6« if MY N� =91 �yyfg'& iO�Y 11� -rNY�� g5t��� yQ� Lyy ye I SO- 7,41 JOMy 5a q is app g 67 o jm'� OI�N� �� > YC� l LyM1�^ TIA at A OW A31� y ^$L Y�s«pp V ay d 6 ii� �IC C T~at �ti C Y tlN a�. unr�Pi V C c G LPj� O �sx M ^ a O A N Y, w e 1: u i N O Y a V L O� w YY C « ° Y M Y �4y C y_yY �yNjW �Y p Y V -S Y .X o 6 � ' 41 u j:. v a� u � �. ,Yp � a M W � N h a 4 iq- r b iliaa N s YONp a +� c�aV `o "a A co M O 6 L� Wu C b i-1 a b� 1�lI QI 1!1 +O t I t 1 :callti $�1 A a O 9 {Y� qMy 40� CO�Y Iris 3q. C.M' G `O Y 3y4�4 aYG �pp�1Na 6« if MY N� =91 �yyfg'& iO�Y 11� -rNY�� g5t��� yQ� Lyy ye I SO- 7,41 JOMy 5a q is app g 67 o jm'� OI�N� �� > YC� l LyM1�^ TIA at A OW A31� y ^$L Y�s«pp V ay d 6 ii� �IC C T~at �ti C Y tlN a�. unr�Pi V C c G M q A N Y, w e u i A « O Y a V M � i Y l• O ° Y M Y �4y C y_yY N � V Y .X ,Yp � a M �N po tia T� N h a 4 iq- r b iliaa N s YONp a +� c�aV `o "a A co M O 6 L� Wu C b i-1 a b� 1�lI QI 1!1 +O t I t 1 :callti $�1 A a O 9 {Y� qMy 40� CO�Y Iris 3q. C.M' G `O Y 3y4�4 aYG �pp�1Na 6« if MY N� =91 �yyfg'& iO�Y 11� -rNY�� g5t��� yQ� Lyy ye I SO- 7,41 JOMy 5a q is app g 67 o jm'� OI�N� �� > YC� l LyM1�^ TIA at A OW A31� y ^$L Y�s«pp V ay d 6 ii� �IC C T~at �ti C Y tlN a�. unr�Pi V N YY. G i � i� S .. n �'.s q o Iwn�°p aL. W al w�l t..= V NaaN■i O " u WiYyt: `•' M. vCi � GC`,l 4 v � = w aN4. G ~l wY p•� OyOGC Ya+.► Y. NOf y�oNtuu HIS—. Y� - Y J¢ pp 1 iys O O pp wQV �Z'1 pG g YYO. Cdr Yq N �N N �� w�N•t� M S.. � Y c O� C Ap � O � .. t� Y�G� 4p' LLG N V� � Qv ♦l � Q ND y0 dNG RG Z � G=1C�i}^ 4V �"•p 99 w� c�6/L CC G'^.g CGi N. wY w Elf- rr qq L R�.1� C .42 rG.9 •` O� y���t gy. ~M� O 0� 6wV »: �� =r 9�y A '�I 1��1 Mw SMM �: Yp� �Y L•, �u G CO �.w .�1]}• GL �. CpaY� -w nCOL •O N ! L `C 01T d+C.��a �Li1. pY Aqx Y� Il2 {�� 2O =Y C o` @ � N �1 4� dW +O. qqL §w SLYC PL y�Lr Y6MM�pYV „Liy1 yj,j is f.. G T My^ v.�w GsN Nx�P ppA ■1 A.�y� b N4` Y +p�{tl(M��S V-bS NC as �Y �i tvj Y� O �L�A YYLC y Y IL N Jl. V N V M W E Y 4 M N Y L N t z y O Y Y Y V G7�Or3.rS .w Y> L N'O _O b V M `` Y Y r N i&W iit Z-C cn M O {1 �1 4 y� w i O' >pp �J Wa NZ z g qq 4% i i Y'� t1 0� p� .2 L. �d � C Y +. `u Q Y LOG. m �� 4W ' <G~N n +•1, N Nf w' OriginaliPoor Quality O 4 M g M O S vG. too '�16 9a �' NM vq � . is '•'x ��NI`CGc �p� as o yl1LM i N g NM G t w `rJ i >tl��111 g Y •• Y• Y :: B .�c �u1 U4 O�Y j tpe w O ■'� 'rO g ®• G y�pv �O w Cw YSG►r X4.1 a SIR NyL Eza Gy 01 ca 3� � a ��YU v O {{�1 { ■C119 ` 4 M+ O Fig Mo � 8^ • r to •ppp11 YL NN NV6 l�V vi Jt~Oi .fa V10 II•GMFN ,Fy..`I� B �N. �p V,U N �pV N_ M 'La N Y �w• Oq s LrI+ w^ Lit q ■C1 yN C 6L L�MO YVC�vN C,=N� N i !!!$w MY. pp M�y ^Cq� Q Q Yf•w IIA _Y8i1 aa �L V r ur It GLO,�� C. H CCp E91 f1j CYI G V1 C+ Y 10 {9 i� Y c- ri � ^^0 `V V 4J �� co {� NM R V d O � Y V eL N C L O YC NOL >n• O C V N Y n L C =� Original boor Quality mu Ny O iNY1yL V L n. .yy pp O O CrO Ob Tr� Y� E E � O a L Lunu �_ a gZ L OS YM ,. •> � -e g4 ^ rl �O1 yE Cq Oe�u N _C {Yu� •.Y Jy �� rty r,� wmy �cO�p(•r:� Y6^ S �TK� W t ®� O•w PasYbtl v- ii i Y G.Ad1oCCC' VIC L w ip Y O G> � O Z Y�Y L �yY� R 0,i1� Lni ■� �4 17-1 � qYq me A awY1 10r V�N QM^ iw Yfw ~Er. U c 3tl�mCi M W ri 0 i I I I — /yn Tr� E E � pi 44 n O ig ° b ^ rl �O1 yE Cq Oe�u N _C {Yu� Jy �� Y C V C L p O•w PasYbtl v- ii i .aCp. Zia O'n yy Iz A a.>p 17-1 ti u w LV N i U c 3tl�mCi ~w- b ^C. �ww��$pa3y. }�p O.►•RI�w NL O K Y. y }1 N u� yl y�V r-Y ei ii as Yl�w F� Y 4o V mi a — /yn 11 11 Tr� E E � pi 44 n O ig _a n ^ rl It O MMC �� Y C V C L p O•w PasYbtl Zia naLt� Iz A a.>p 11 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission PROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki P •3tt, Dissociate Planner SUBJECT: E1iIWANPP, NORTH 4RUPEXATION - etafif requests direction on revision of the wor`�ogr:w. I. ABSTRACT: The opoortunity to annex the Etiwanda North area as a single annexation may depend on a concentrated City effort from January 1989 through June 2989. Such an effort would mean giving this project priority over other projects on the Planning Division Work Program.. Staff requests direction from the Commission. II. BACKGROUND: During 2988, effort has been made to annex the Sphere 5f Influehce into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. To date, two annexations have been completed and two are expected to be completed by the end of January 1989. At this time, there is an opportunity to annex several parcels totaling approximately 5,640 acres. These parcels are under multi- ownerships. The owners have fo ,z d a consortium for the purpose of development and are requesting annexation to the City (see Exhibit "A") . The City wishes to annex the properties in order to ^cess development under City Standards of DevelopmEnt. In th- past most of the development which has occurred in the Sphere Territory lees been processed under County Standards of Development. Severe time constraints need to be met in order to include all the properties in one annexation proceeding. See attached Draft Sphere Annexation Timel ine, 0 meet 0i s schedule, the work program r foul d need to be amended to give priority to the annexation ox the Etiwanda North area. III. ANALYSIS: A meeting of Department Heads will be held prior to this omm $$On ABeting to discuss the feasibility of meeting the Sphere Annexation Timeline and to make a staff recommendation to the COMMission. The recormndation will be presented orally to the Commission. ITEM P PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: ETIWANDA NORTH ANNEXATION January 11, 1989 Page 2 Res y su Brad er l City Plan er BB :MB:ko Attachments: Exhibit 'A" > Etiwanda North Annexation Map Sphere Amoxation Timeline Lm nor AREA Figure f -2 PLANNING AREA 11111/1111 GPV L "- # +r�.•,�a.` UNINGeairsreted Area W6thW City Spit®rQ of latieeeee NOUH elTY CF RA.NCM CUCAMONGA PLANNING, P-5 MIMI TnU.. E1' WAtM NORTH At RATION EXHIBIT " — — SCALE- 1 �3E�HE�eE AiRiRV GII.L1aFCO III.SPHER IV.0 /CRE ANNEX ANNEX SPECIFIC TENTATI SPHERE E.NORTH PLAN TRACT Reso Reso Submit Submit Intent Intent Applica- Applica- new 2/15 tion tion sphere LAFCG terri- submit tory: applic Must w /voter complet list before sphere review annex approx 30 days 2/15 LAFCO ARC LAFCO DRC CC CC TaxReso Tax Reso DRAn SPECIFIC PLAN circ 3/1to4/17 (prop. owner PC 5/17 LAFCO vote ?) Public approv Hearing .13mo) -� PC 5/17 Public Hearing 30 days CC 6/21 Public Bearing ST AM V.DEV 'I.GPA VII.RIR VIII.RFQ VE AGREE CONS JL Submit Subatit by Circ. Prepare Applica- March 15 Notice 12/27 tion for May Prep. (Melcher PC model- 30 day Circ re,ferenc circ 1/9 1/4 to vpoci!ic to 2/13 2/3 Plan DWT CC 2/15 EIR prop 15+days (INCLUDE Begin Archeol Work Circ 2/16 Drain vpensp Compile Fiscal Existing Response Document. Caltrans & Incorp AQMD HOP Schonl Comments Firg) Screen Check DWT Copy 3/8 EIR circ Uail S t� DGIR 5/1 3/15 Resond PC 5/17 PC 5/17 PC 5/17 to DpEIR Public Public Public comments searing Hearing Hearing as recvd 30 30 30 Prepare days days days FEIR screen CC 6/21 CC 6/21 CC 6121 ch+&ck/ Public tublic Public PC draft Hearing Hearing Hearing by 5/10 2 wks PC 5/17 File prepare CC 7/5 Notice FEIR 2nd read Determin final 6123 by 6/7 Appeal Perk.: r3days eal rn 30 daya iod ends 8/5 9 P- y 30 days CC 6/21 LAFCO approval Public (4 -5mo) Hearing from submital 2 wkc C.8/16 CC 7/5 2nd read CC Reso appeal An.._x Period 30 days LAFCO CC ends 8/5 Cert ICES ANEX 0.8/16 LAFCO Corti- PC 5/17 Public Hearing 30 days CC 6/21 Public Bearing ST AM V.DEV 'I.GPA VII.RIR VIII.RFQ VE AGREE CONS JL Submit Subatit by Circ. Prepare Applica- March 15 Notice 12/27 tion for May Prep. (Melcher PC model- 30 day Circ re,ferenc circ 1/9 1/4 to vpoci!ic to 2/13 2/3 Plan DWT CC 2/15 EIR prop 15+days (INCLUDE Begin Archeol Work Circ 2/16 Drain vpensp Compile Fiscal Existing Response Document. Caltrans & Incorp AQMD HOP Schonl Comments Firg) Screen Check DWT Copy 3/8 EIR circ Uail S t� DGIR 5/1 3/15 Resond PC 5/17 PC 5/17 PC 5/17 to DpEIR Public Public Public comments searing Hearing Hearing as recvd 30 30 30 Prepare days days days FEIR screen CC 6/21 CC 6/21 CC 6121 ch+&ck/ Public tublic Public PC draft Hearing Hearing Hearing by 5/10 2 wks PC 5/17 File prepare CC 7/5 Notice FEIR 2nd read Determin final 6123 by 6/7 Appeal Perk.: r3days eal rn 30 daya iod ends 8/5 9 P- y