Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/04/12 - Agenda Packet701-02 4 -12,80 PC Agenda a 10f 5 GAO G�CAS1q�,C'1 .977 CITIt OF RANCHOCUGAMNGA PLA yJING Cl MMI A il .AGENDA-, WEDNESDAY APRIL 12, 1989 TWO p.m. LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA L Pledge of Allegiance IL Roll Call CommissionerBlakesley_ CcmmissionerEmeriek Commissioner Ghitiea _ Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Tolstoy W_ Announcements IV. Approval of Minutes February 22, 190 Adjourned Meeting of Mard'; .larch 22, 1989 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any ;{em, it should be removed for discussion. A. DESIGN REVIEW FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 8704 - GREUBEI: - The design review of a se -serve ear wash, line shop, and auto detail shop, on 3.8 acres of land within the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the southwest corner of Haven and Lemon - APN: 201- 262 -48. (Continued from March 22, 1989.) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' FOR DEVELOPMENT' REVIEW 8$-21 - A ERY -;A 10,000 square foot addition town existing warehAuse building, totaling 43,250 square feet on 2.27 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 2) of the 1 c strial Area Specific flan, located on the south side of 9th Street, east of Vineyard Avenue APN: 209=013 - VI. Public Herrings The following items are public hear=ings in which concerned individuals mlty voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be r4 ;ognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address., All 3, 1.ch opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual foie each p;nfect. C. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 81 -01 - HARRY C'S - A consideration to modify, suspend, or revoke an entertainment permit granted for a disc jockey doing vocals and playing records rightly in conjunction with a restaurant /night club, located at 10877 Foothill Boulevard. D. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 0 -02 HARRY C'S - A request r to conduct live comedy acts, lip contests, contests, hair and clothing fashion shows, live entertainment concerts, live jazz, and special promotion events for local businesses and groups in conjunction with a restaurant /night club at 10877 Foothill Boulevard. E. EN*'I =tONMENTAL .ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13809 -UNEZ - A residential subdivision of 7 single family lots on 2.47 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest Corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue - APN: 201 - 251 -57 do 58. (Continued from March 22, 1989.) F. MINOR,, EVELOPMENT REVIEW 89 -07 - A. W. DAVIES - A request or expansion of a non - conforming use by adding 710 srluare feet of office space to an existing building and warehouse totaling 4,560 squam feet on 3.82 acres of land in 'he General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the southeast corr_ar of 9th Street and Heima _:venue - APN: 209- 031 -53 do 54. (Continued from Marca 22, 19P1J G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89 -03 - SHOWBIZ PIZZA TIME A request to establish an arcade within a restaurant located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue - APN: 208- 261 -25 & 26. (Continued from Mara 22, 1989.) H. ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - _N request to consider additional alternatives for the realignment of the north leg of Red Hill Country Club Drive by including a raised, curbed median on Foothill Boulevard in order to eliminate left turns intD and jdt of Red Hill Country Club Drive. I. ENV11tONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11473 - LACY - A subdivision of 1,15 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Low Residentia! -Development District, located on the south side of Hamilton Street, east of Hermosa Avenue, vN: 202- 201 -73. J. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 89 -01 - SHELLY'S RESTAURANT - The review of providing live entertainment in conjunction . with a restaurant use, located at 8038 Haven Avenue, Suit., E. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMcWT DISTRICTS AMENDMENT . 89 -01 - CTTY OF RANCaIO CUCAMUNGA - A request to amend 1.65 acres of the Development Districts map from Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), located approximately 600 feet south of Lemon Avenue, 470 feet north of Highland Avenue on the east side of Archibald Avenue - APN, 201- 252 -41. L. CO;IDITIONAL_ USE PERMIT 89 -04 - DELAPIEDRA - A rq� uest to establish the sale of hard liquor far on -site eansumption at Felipe's, an existing restaurant of 7,360 square feet on .85 acres of land in the Community Commercial District- of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 3), located "the Miller's Outpost Center at 8017 Archibald Avenue - e ,h 1077 - 641 -69. M. MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT 12659 - BLANTON - A request to delete a portion of the local trail system adjacent to the p:- oposed Community Trail on the south side of 24th Street for a subdivision of 13$ single family lots and three common lots on 67.67 acres of land in the Very Low Residential. District (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) within th1 Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street -'APN: 225- 111 -38 and 39. VII. Yaw Ems+ Iiness N. MODIFICATION TO THE VIRGINIA DARE PARKING STUDY - A review of modifications to the snared parking concept and projected parking demand for the Virginia Dare Center. VUL Dirwtor's Reports O. INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN - A request to initiate an amendment to the land use regulations for Subarea 7. P. PLANNING DIVISION WORK PROGRAM 1989/90 1X. Commission Business r X. 11161!0 c' ,Imenttz i This is % 40, Crme and Mace for the general pu4I1c to address the CammP, iOn. 1 items rb be discussed here are those which do not alreaC ; app�br on this agenda. r XL AR1*rnmertk The Planning Commission has adopted Adminlstrat'.-;e Regulattons that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. if items go beyond VW tune, the, shall be h ?ard only with the consent of the Commission. { f� L a I l I L j l ;t 'ICINITY MAP OerAg10 # *relasnoray ut►oor Crry OF RANCHO CUCAI*OW U 7 WIM CITY OF RANCHO�9CUCANONOA �tc�nroM STAFF REPORT O O FI Z DATE: April 12, 1489 U,1�;> 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Plantar BY: Debra Meier, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -04 - GREUBBL - [he aes gn review of a se -serve car was , u e s op, and auto detail shop, on 3.8 acres of land within the° Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the southwest corner of Haven and Lemon - APN 201- 262 -48. 1. ABSTRACT: This item is continued from the March 22, 1989 Planning orsn ss on meeting to allow staff to prepare a resolution approving the Design Review of thr_ car wash related to Conditional Use Permit 87 -04. The resolution was prepared based on public testimony and cortmisslan comment at that meeting, and is attached for youa consfderatian. Respectfully' mftied, Brad Buller '+ City Planner/ BB:DM:JS Attachments: Resolution of Approval IT MAJ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVINt DESIGN REVIEW PHASE 11 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87 -04 FOR A SELF -SERVE CAR WASH, AUTO LUBE BAYS AND AUTO DETAIL SHOP, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LEMON AVeNUE WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MkKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR: 201- 262 -48. A. Recitals. (i) On June 24, 1987, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 87 -98, thereby approving, subject to specified conditions, Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -04, which provides for the construction of a phased neighborhood Shopping center, Phase II of whict includes a self -serve car wash, automotive tube, and automotive detail shop on 3.8 acres wit1kiin the Neighborhood Conrercial District, (ii) One of the; pecified conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -04 was a condition requiring that t'le design of the westerly portion of the site, which included the car wash, tube bays and detail shop, be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. (iii) On March 2, 1989, and again on starch 16, 1989, the Design Review Committee reviewed the design, including site plans, conceptual landscape plans, and elevations, of the westerly portion of the site, Said Committee referred the application to this Comrmission for consideration. (iv) On March 22, 1989, the Planning COMIssion conducted a public hearing and received public testimony reg &rding the Design Review of the car wash, tube bays, and detail shop. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Omission of the City of Rancho Cucamonrja as follows: 1. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meetings, including written staff reports, the minutes of the above - referenced Design Review Committee meetings, and public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follcv (a) There were several minor site plan changes from the originally approved master site plan, in fulfillment of the Condition NO. S of Planning Commission Resolution No. N7 48 and in response to acoustical studies and resident concerns, which do not constitute a modification to the Conditional Use hermit No. 87 -04 pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.04.030.6.1, IA-- 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP 87 -04 - GREUBEL April 12, 1989 Page 2 (b) The proposed project, as conditioned hereby, complies with All - xinimuitt development standards of the City of Rancho Cucaringa ; (c) The proposed project, as conditioned hereby, provides for landscaping areas which will aesthetically upgrade the subject site and provide screening of the project site from surrounding residences; (d) The proposed project, as conditioned hereby, is consistent with the approvals granted by Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -98, including site plan and architectural site. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing sn March 22, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the obJectiv- of the Development Code and the put -poses of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed !s_e is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the Findings and conclu, nits set fort's in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. 1, The applicant shall prepare an "Operation and Maintenance Agreement" to the satisfaction of the City planner and City Attorney. This document shall be recorded against the property prior to issuance of building permits. The aarment shall include the following conditions of operation: a. The facility shall have an on -site attendant at all times during business hours. The attendant shall be available to control noise, litter and other nuisances as they occur, to diminish the impact of this facility on the neighborhood. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP 87 -04 - GREUBEL April 12, 1983 Page 3 b. Hours of Operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10 :00 p.m.. At close of business, all operations shall cease and water and power will be automatically shut -off, except for security lighting or that which is required for fire safety. c. The site shall be develwped and maintained in accordance with the approved plans, which includes architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping and grading, on file with the Planning Division, and Developn*nt Code regulations. d. Any graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. e. The site shall be kept frEe of trash and debris at all times, and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than twenty-four (24) hours. f. All operations shall ba conducted to comp i 'th the following noise ;e-ve1. standard:. No activity shalt create noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dBA during the hours of 7 :00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 6G dBA during the hears of 10 :00 p.m. and 7 :00 a.m. 2. The building accent color snail be blue (Dunn Edwerds QB- 379). This accent color shall also be used on Phase I of the project. The accent color on Phase I shall be painted prior to issuance of building permits for Phase II of the project. 3. The roof line over the car wash bays shall be stepped to create a two - tiered roof -line. 4. All lighting, pole mounted or building mounted, shall be no more than 15 feet above finished grade. All light fixtures shall be shielded. And directed ;way from adjacent residences. S. A 6 foot 4raaght iron fence shall bay placed ten feet east of the west property line. A locking gates shall be installed for maintenance access. 6. Landscape design along west property line shall provide a visual screen of the car wash and provide privacy to adjacent residents. Trees along this area shall be 24 inch box minimum size. /( A -� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP 87 -04 - GREUBEL April 142, 1989 Page 4 7. Landscape esign on Lemon Avenue shy:?,, provide a visual screen fron, residences north of Lemon Avenue, to the extent ppossible. Provisions must be conid2red for view through 1andscapir.j by police vehicles on patrol along Lemon Avenue. 8. Final landscape design shall be subject to Design Review Committee and City Planner approval, 9. The building's plumbing and electr' cal system shall be designed and constructed with a mechanise: which shall automatically shut -off water and power, except for security lighting, from 10 :00 p.m. to 7 :00 a.m. Details shall be included in the construction drawings. This shall not be deemed to include water or power necessary for fire safety. 4, The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of is Resolution. APFROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 1989. PLANNIRa CORMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McN1eT_, VFA_Trman ATTEST: Brad u er, re ary I, Brad Butler, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12 day of April, 1989, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �' q-6- - 6- E E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GLCAAIOA el � j l,lr 197: DATE: Ar it 12, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -21 AdtKV - A tu,UUU square foot - addition to an existing wares ouse building, totaling 43,250 square feet on 2.27 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 2) of the Industrial Area Roecific Plan, located on the south side of 9th Street, east of Viiiayard Avenue - APN: 290 - 013 -2. - I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use & Zoning: North Vacant (Proposed Industrial Buildings); General Industrial (Subarea 2) South Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 2) East - Existing Industrial Buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 2) West - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 2) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial. East General Industrial West - General Indu ;b.a -il D. Site Characteristics: The project site is located dir,4ctly east of e exfs ng office /warehouse building. Vegetation on the site consists only of seasonal grasses. The existing 2,200 square foot building (See Exhibit "D ") is slated for removal. ITEM B PLANNING COKAISSION STAFF REPORT AR 88 -21. April 12, 1989 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: * The warehouse square footage total includes the 10,000 square foot building addition, II. ANALYSIS; A. General. This project proposes an expans ?on to an existing 33,20 square f6ot industrial building (this total does snot include the 2,2501 square foot building slated for removall. The expansion will consist of a 10,000 squa° ') foot warehouse building which will be attached to the existing building, resulting in a building total of 43,250 square feet. The applicant intends to continue the existing architectural theme, with color modifications, on the proposed building addition. Additionally, the applicant's proposal brings the site into compliance with development standards of the Industrial Area Specific Plan in terns of landscaping, parking, tiruek parking, screening of roof mounted equipment and the provision of an outdoor employee lunch plaza. Foils, ,gig issuance of a Negative Declaration by the Com ision, the City Planner would grant approval With coneitions as recommended below. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Chitiea, Coleman, Tools oy ) —rev Iewed the project on March 2, 1989, and recommended approval based on the following changes: 1. Shrub planting should be provided along the east property line as landscape screening adjacent to the existing buildings. The northern portion should be expanded to a width of three (3) feet, the southern portion may retrain as proposed. G _Q a a a Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Sp::es of Use Footage Ratio Re ii red Provided Office 3,250 1/250 13 13 Manufactu. ^ing 6,000 1/500 12 12 Warehouse 34,000* 1/1000 (1st 20,000) 20 20 1/2000 (2nd 20,000) 7 7 . -.OTAL 52 52 * The warehouse square footage total includes the 10,000 square foot building addition, II. ANALYSIS; A. General. This project proposes an expans ?on to an existing 33,20 square f6ot industrial building (this total does snot include the 2,2501 square foot building slated for removall. The expansion will consist of a 10,000 squa° ') foot warehouse building which will be attached to the existing building, resulting in a building total of 43,250 square feet. The applicant intends to continue the existing architectural theme, with color modifications, on the proposed building addition. Additionally, the applicant's proposal brings the site into compliance with development standards of the Industrial Area Specific Plan in terns of landscaping, parking, tiruek parking, screening of roof mounted equipment and the provision of an outdoor employee lunch plaza. Foils, ,gig issuance of a Negative Declaration by the Com ision, the City Planner would grant approval With coneitions as recommended below. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Chitiea, Coleman, Tools oy ) —rev Iewed the project on March 2, 1989, and recommended approval based on the following changes: 1. Shrub planting should be provided along the east property line as landscape screening adjacent to the existing buildings. The northern portion should be expanded to a width of three (3) feet, the southern portion may retrain as proposed. G _Q a a a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 88 -21 April 12, 1989 Page 3 2. An outdoor employee lunch plaza should be provided in the landscape area 4.4 the northwest corner of the site. This should include a cement pad and permanent furniture. 3. Fnisting roof mounted equipment should be completely screened from view on all sides. The building material used in the roof screen should be compatible with the building design and color. 4. A six (6) foot screen wall should be provided at the northeast corner of the site extending from the east property line to the easterly driveway. The wall should be designed to retain and also be concealed by the berming along Ninth Street. a. Roll -up and dock high doors should be painted to match the building and not the accent trim. 6. Landscaping should be increased to adequately screen loading and parking areas. The plans have been revised to reflect the vecommendea changes. C. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Environmental cec s.. and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with these findings., the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. III.. RECOWENDATION: the Planning Commission issue a Negative Brad Bull fr ,� City Pl ner B8: :sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" Grading Plan t Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations �_3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION Z-e-t C L] Original Poor Quality rsPi/rF • r2 I in —... "I"f eF !!�:. 4- 1 A , T!'A o LP Dg000Moo TITLE: R cu :3 CY 0 a. 0 11 El rc �i � 1 i t s! t s '�'t ,��ti'r�. � �.' �fl � �'Y'A.�a�i�'ir. �I� .7r ♦ 'r �. �. � o ANA IL ISO y rrrra�r��ase•mrr� - r. . -- __ R w Emil I n | ui CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��,cAnr�y STAY F REPORT f DATE: April 12, 1989 1977 j TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission rr74c Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 87 -01 - HARRY C'S - A consideration to modify, susper or rev a an ente rtainment permit granted for disc Jockey doing vocals and playing records nightly in conjunction with a restaurant /night club, vacated at 10877 Foothill Loulevard. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 89-02 - HARRY C'S - A request to conduct live come acts, lip-sync contests, hair and clothing fashion shows, live entertainment concerts, live jazz, and special promotion events for local businesses and groups in conjunction with a restaurant/night club a* 10877 Foothill Boulevard. I. ABSTRACT: The applicant is applying for a new Entertainment el rmit 79 -02 for a variety Of entOrtaiflMi nt uses not permitted under his current Entertaiaamant Pornit 87 -01. Also under consideration is the status, and potential revocation, of Entertainment Permit 87-01. YI. BACKGROU M. Since 1987, Harry C's has operated under nterUl nt Permit 87 -01 which was approved by the Planning Commission for a "disc Jockey dninC vocals and playing records nightly from 8 :00 p.m. till 2:00 a.m. Over several months, . a number of problems, disturbances, and violations occur %- d at Harry C's which resulted in review by the Public Safety Commission and the Planning Conmission in June and July 1988, respectively. On .uly 13, 1988, the Planning Commission held a hearing to consider two requests 1. Recommendation of the Public Safety Coninission to modify the conditions of approval and to keep the scope of entertainment restricted; and 2. Application by Harry C's to allow an expansion of the scope of entertainment. iTEh3 �,:s: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: EP 87 -01, EP 89 -02 - HARRY C'S April 12, 1989 Page 2 E After a leng'.hy delib! "ation, the Planning Commission declined to revoke the encertaipmr,tt permit and, instead, determined that the applicant should be permitted to continue the currently approved entertainment for a period of 120 days to demonstrate ability to operate in conformance with the conditions of approval and in a manner that is not contrary to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the public. The Commission also added the following conditions to Entertainment Permit 87 -01 (see Exhibit F'q"). 1. No expansion of the entertainment permit is allowed. 2. A minimum of two uniformed, licensed security guards.. 3. A hearing should be set 120 days later to further consider modification, suspension, or revocation of Entertainment Permit 87 -01. This decision was appealed to the City Council by the applicant. On August 17, 1988, the City Council conducted a hearing and upheld the Planning Commission's action. AOL On September 28, 1988, the Planning Commission conducted a hearing for the new Entertainment Permit 88 -01 (see attached minutes Exhiblu "B "). The applicant was requesting approval of the following entertainment uses: live comedy, sports celebrities and cheerleaders, lip -sync contests, hair and clothing fashion shows, Miss Hawaiian Tropic Beauty Pageant and disc jockey. The Commission voiced strong reservation with the proposed entertainment uses. The Sheriff's Department testified that there had been 17 calls for service since July 13, including disturbances, public drunkenness, a fight, and a handgun possession. The Sheriff's Department indicated that although they had been receiving better cooperation (i.e. - uniformed securi ,y guards) from Harry C's, they were opposed to expansion of the entertainment use, The Foothill Fire District stated that they had not Issued any citations since July 13, 1988 and could support expansion only subject to periodic review. Staff recommended that the Comission not consider any expansion of entertainment until the 120 days were (,omplete. The Planning Commission concurred with staff's recommendation and continued the item to the meeting of November 30, 1988. On November 30, 1988, the Planning Commission heard testimony and er•,,,-'ned the facts during a public hearing for the new Entertainment Permit 88 -01. The Commissioners felt that expansion of the entertainment was not appropriate due to public safety concerns as reviewed (see Exhibit 'C"). The Commission voted C)p,I, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPOPT RE: EP 87 -01, EP 89 -02 - HARRY C'S April 12, 1989 Page S unanimously (5 -0) to deny the request for a new Entertainment Permit 88 -01 and they voted (3 -2) to continue Entertainment Permit 87 -01 for 120 days to the meeting of April 12, 1989. The purpose of the 120 day continuance was to allow the applicant the opportunity to establish a track record of good management and safe operation. III. ANALYSIS: A. Proposed Entertainment Uses: The pplicant has submitted a new list of requested entertainment use expansion that includes live bands, comedy, talent contests and hair and clothing fashion shows (see Exhibit "E "). The applicant has indicated that the fashion shows would be limited to daily evening 'year and fashionable attire, No nudity, see through fabrics or wet fabrics would be permitted. The applicant proposes that entertainment be allowed 7 days a week, from 8 :00 p.m. to 2.00 a.m. The applicant is requesting these entertainment uses in order to be competitive with other clubs in the area and, in particular, to attry:y customers on the slower weeknights. B. Public Safety Concerns: The Foothill Fire Protection District as reportea only one tali for service since December 14, 1988: The call was for information ovily. There have been ro violations in this period of time with two night inspections conducted. (See Exhibit "F "). The Sheriff's Department received a total of fifteen calls (see Exhibit "G') between January 7, 1989 and March 21, 1989. Four of these calls were disturbance calls and two were calls regarding assault with a deadly weapon. Both the Sheriff and Fire Departments will provide an update to the ^o�issior at the meeting. The Sheriff's Department and Fire Department indicated concern that an increase in entertainment will ca=use an increase in public safety problems. i`:_ FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make the 0 [owing fintungs In order to approve Entertainment Permit No. 89 -02: A. The conduct of the establishment or the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare. B. The premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner. C,D -3 PLANNING COMMISSION STIFF REPORT RE: EP 87 -01, EP 89 -02 - MARRY C'S April 12, 1989 +ge 4 C C. The applicant or any other person associated with him as principal or partner, or in a position or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business for which such permit is sought to be issued, has not been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any offense involving the presentation, exhibition or performance of any obscene show of any kind, or of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude, nor has had any approval, permit or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years. D. That granting the application would not create a public nuisance. E. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace- and quiet of any surrounding residential neighborhood. F. The applicant has not made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. Regare;ng the existing Entertainment Permit 87 -01, the Planning Coar;ssion may suspend or revoke the permit if the Commission Finds and determines that any permittee, his agent or employee, or any person connected or associated with U.e permittee as partner, director, officer, general manager, or other person who is exercising managerial authority`of, or on behalf of, the permittee or any entertainer acting under the authority of such permit:. 1. Made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of a material fact in the application for permit, or any report or record required to be filed pursuant to this chapter; or 2. Violated any provision of this chapter, or of any statue, ordinance, or con A tion relating to his permitted activity; or 3. Is convicted of a felony, or any crime involving moral turpitude; or 4. Violated any rules, regulations or conditions adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council relating to the permittee's business or permit; or 5. Conducted a permitted business in a manner, contrary to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the public; or v1itNN the e� L� rQ V ,yst s A, ON` Q9 g� to be y pow' cteit '49e *e S ���b2 a�� strated raw f �c a �'re� S'c ` rQS a Q tb 1e9es W, 0l; %ll it totA l a 6 4<��', P�Zp � No � �Q1a S Zak Ox ��` met � yeaeo� �i • cc �'� � eoQ oQ�� � e9�t9 � ®Q aQQ< S4�QQ � eQ�� to e-N\ Nei ; �t""6' �p3 sQeLtR � PQQioer qa, a Qua �e et o���,i o {y.Qtb et 3p �s o §�e�n�� 6A ko �`xy ib Ss N ' 0e �� ous Q'� e�ta�� r�ct ate ep errs �' cogt or ce'�� ed pis' pe4 Pt'chm ��h�ss�. ' �Q�oQoSi�� qf4 s G zaf, F.� obit L E is PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: EP 87 -0I, EP 89 -02 - ffARRY C'S April 12, 1989 Page 5 4 Fj 6. Demonstrated that he /she is unfit to be tasted with the privileges granted by such a permit. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and receive public testimony. Staff recommends that the Planning., Commission take separate mo"Zions regarding the two requests, If the Planning Commission tan support there -oroposed entertatilment, then staff should be directed . to prepares appropriate resolutions for adoption at the next nceti Respectful f da'r Brad Buller . City Planner BBzBA:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Resolution of Approval No. 88 -143 Exhibit "B" - Minutes of September 28, 1988 Planning Conmission Meeting Exhibit "C" - Minutes of November 30, 1988 Planning. Commission Meeting Exhibit "D" - Previous Entertainment List Exhibit " €" - Proposed Entertainment List and Application E-xhibit "F" - Memo from Fire District Exhibit "G" - Memo from Sheriff's Department RESOLUTION No. 88 -143 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 87 -01 FOR HARRY C'S RESTAURANT /NIGHTCLUB LOCATED AT 10877 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD A. Recitals. (1) On June 24, 1987, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 8 7- 102, thereby approving, subJect to specified conditions, vocals for 4ancirg in the Harry Cs Restaurant on the southru, -st corner of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue. A true and complete copy of said Resolution is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated herein by this reference. (ii) On June 7, 1988, the Public Safety Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga publicly conducted a hearing to review the reports of law enforcement, fire safety, and related public safety problems and reports of expansion of the scope of gntcrtainment beyond that approved by this Commission and recomsrended that additional conditions of operation be imposed on Entertainment tainment Permit No. 87 -01. A true and complete copy of the Public Safety Commission findihis are attached hereto as Exhibit "8" and is incorporated herein by this reference. (iii) On June 24r 1988, Harry H. Chan applied for an annual renewal of the Entertainment Permit, as required by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 5.12.110, which included a request for expansion of the nature and scope of the entertainment. (iv) On July 13, 1988, this Commission conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing to determine whether substantial evidence existed to support revocation of Entertainment Permit No. 87 -01. occurred, (v) All legal pvrerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have B. Resolution. NO1, THEREFC -E, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planting Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereb, specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence, including written staff reports and further testimonial evidence presented by the Sheriff's Department and Foothill Fire Protection District during the public hearing described in parapaph A. ('iv), above, this Commission specifically finds that violations of Condition No. 4a of Planning Commission Resolution No. 87 -102, violations of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 5.12.100, subsections (2), (4), and (5), and violations of Rar..ho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 3.36.050, have occur °�d since the adopticn of Planning Comrarission Resolution No. 87 -102, contriq to the peace, heC. safety and general welfare of the public. MA Plt July 2I, 1983 Page 1 3. Based upon violations identified above, this Commission ftlinerr to revoke Entertainment Permit No. 87 -01; however, in order to insure €uta,re compliance with the conditions and City regulations identified in paragraph 2, abo", this Commission hereby modifies Entertainment Permit No. BT-ol by adding the following conditions: a. The Secretary of this Commission is hereby directed to set a public hearing for a regular meeting of the Commission, approximately 120 days after the datc, of adoption of this Resolution, to further consider modification, suspensions or revocation of Entertainment Permit No. 87 -01. At such time, this Cthmissicn shall review the operation of the M. mittee's business to determine svnether it is being operated consistent with the conditions of approval and all other City regulation$. b. No expansion of the entertainment permit is allowed. c. A minimum of two uniformed, duly licensed and regularly employed security guards from a reputable security firm shall be required to be on the premises from sunset until two hours after the cessations of any entertainment. At least one of said guards to bd and remain on duty in the parking and outside adjacent areas of the facility. 4. This Commission further finds that ail conditions previously imposed by Entertainment Permit; No. 87-01, ano Planning Commission Resolution No. 87 -102, attached hereto as Exhibit "A ", shall continue in all respects and with full force and affect. WO S. The Secretary of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TP DAY OF JULY, 1988. PLANK! 1, MWjSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly it!troduced, passed, and adopted by the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of July, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONS -RS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, TOLSTOY # ABSTAIN* COKWSSTONFRS: MCNTF1 p king" signs. She felt Planning should send a letter to the schools string th to provide adequate parking for teachers and staff. Mr. Eu r stated the Temporary Use Permit could include co tjons to cover grand ope 'ngs. Commissioner akesley felt it Mould be more appropr a to issue a number to prospect buy s instead of having them camp ou or a week or two. Chairman McNi'et re ned the public hearing. Mr. Bailey stated that wring their la opening they had utilized the number system and the developer uld be ha to have no overnight parking. The public hearing was close . Commissioner Tolstoy states he h no problem with future development,:, also utilizing this concept. Motion: Moved by itiea, seconded b Blakesley, to adopt the Resolutions denying Variance -19 and 8B -20 and dir staff to prepare an amendment to the Developmen ode to cover this situati including hours of operation. Motion carri y the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, M EL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS; NONE A ENT: Cav'MISSIONERS; EMERICK - carrie Q. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 88 -01 - HARRY C'S - A request to conduct live comedy acts, sports'cel e,ri ties an _d cheer 1 ea ers promoting sports teams, lip -sync contests, hair and clothing fashion shows, Miss Hawaiian Tropic Beauty Pageant and a request to continue "disc Jockey" doing vocals avid playing records nightly in conjunction with a restaurant /night club, located at 10877 Foothill Boulevard. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Cha ---man McNiel opened the pubiii, hearing. Harry Histet, 3666 University, Riverside, attorney for the applicant, stated that after the public hearing at the City Council Mee,tJng, the City Council decided not to act, stating that the application was ancomplets. At that time the City attorney advised them they had the right to refile. Harry C's hired an Entertainment Director to be certain the entertainment would be upscale. They had not realized they were exceeding the entertainment permit and cut back when they were informed they were exceeding their permit. Since the Mother's Day overcrowding he stated there had been no other Fire Department violations. he stated they new had unifortm4d security guards and had changed management at tha, restaurant. $ Planning Commission Minutes -14- Se Fember 28 c > - 19 p , 1986 Jim Engelhart, 2 Kansas, D -28, Redlands, Entertainment Manager for Harry C's, described the proposed entertainment package. Commissioner elakesley asked for clarification regarding the fashion shows from ta. local merchants. Mr. Engelhary described similar shows �_; one of their other locations - evening attire, ski wear, etc. Commissioner Chitiea asked what would prevent Harry C'; from conducting wet -T shirt contests. Mr. Engelhart stated that for Rancho Cucamonga they were not right and riot necessary. Commissioner Chitiea asked the clientele age group. Mr. Engelhart stated their entertainment was aimed at the 21 - 39 age group. Robert Peopler, Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's station, advised that since July 13, 1988, there had been 17 calls for service, including 4 disturbance can s, 2 arrests for drunk in public, 2 vehicle break -ins, 1 fight, 1 subject in possession of a handgun, and 1 stolen vehicle recovery. He reported that Mt. Chan had cooperated with the police department and had hired security 1 guards. However, Lt. Peppler felt expansio.i of the permit would add to the problem. Chairman McNiel asked for an estimation of the age group the Sheriffs were encountering. Lt. Peppler responded 21 - 30. He mentionee, they had encountered problems with minors in the 1tunge in the past, but Hr. Chan seemed to have improved his policing. Fred 0eaux, 11036 Shaw Street, Rancho Cucamonga stated that past 10 :00 P.M. the crowd is mainly the younger group. He suggested that if the Cify •oved the expanded entertainment permit, they stipulate severe limitatirms on what Harry C's could do. ke also felt the applicant should prove ovzr the long haul that they could control their clientele before being allowed to expand their permit. Frank Cardenas, stated he was a former manager of Harry C's, but no longer worked there. He stated the applicant had installed new guidelines ar�d felt it w %s unfair to penalize him for prior management. Mr. Histen stated that the Sheriff's departneent is sometimes called before there is a problem in order to be sure a situation does not get out of hand. He also stated that as of October 5, they will have been working with the reduced entertainment for 120 days and they requested that the Commission count the 120 -day review period from the reduction in entertainirzrit instead of ',he July 27 Planning Commission Meeting date. As there were no further comments, the puf;lic hearing Nki d. Planning Commission Minutes -1:�- tem er 28 , 1988 (::,)C) - 9 Brad Butler, City Planner, stated that Chief Almond of the Fire District was not available to personally address the Commission because he was fighting the fire in the hills. However, Chief Almond had indicated there had been no new were issued. He could "Pport expansion of the permit if a provision ore added to allow future evaluation at specified times. P ts�on Commissioner Chitiea stated that on July 13 Harry C'S came perilously close to revocation of their Entertainment permit. ThQ 120- imposed to have them prove they coult handle the situation and she wanted to see a proven track record, day evaluation period was appeal to a younger crowd, nottyoung the proposed entertainment package would Young Professionals. Commissioner Tolstoy Stated the situation should never have been allowed to get out of hand and it showed poor judgment on the part of Harry C's. He also felt the City had received poor Cooperation from the applicant. He indicated the proposed entertainment list needed revision and he wanted to wait the 1Z0 days from the date of the Resolution. the Commissioner Biakesley agreed that the 320 -day evaluation period pertained to the revocation of the would automatically cmnside. ex anaied he was unwilling a �'sa of the 120 days, P ,,ion of the permit at ti end Commiss.oner Chitiea stated' that if the applicant returned with an expansion rangecoficlienteiePr °posed entertainnent Quid need to appeal to a broader Chairman McNiel stated the applicant was asking the Plmnning Commission to told the Planning aCo�assiono they iintendeds to operate a " house" and now they were focusing on their need for ratertainmenthman class r high class dinner Mr. Buller recommended the item be contint:sd to November 23, 1988. Commissioner Chitiea asked if the public hearing could be reopened to ask if the applicant were willing to agree to the continuance and consider a restructuring of the entertainment. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing. Mr. Histen stated they were willing. Morion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Blakesle Permit 88 -01 to November, 23, 1988. y, continue Entertainment Metion carried by the foliowing vote: AYES: CO LN i; VAUNERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMM ISSI0"NERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK � tanning Commission Minutes _16- - carried ew- f 01 000-2 September 28, 1988 C131W iwis, 856 Berkeley Court, Ontario, Chairman of the Church Tru appreciated the tiork that the staff had done. He agreed cu,., ihalhould be eliminated. Heaeing no fu r testimony, the public hearing was closed. Conmissioner Blakes supported the first part of th dification but felt condition 10 should b worded to have them contra to the Beautification Fund. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City At ey, stated tWWwas no formula to calculate the fees. AV Chairman MkNiel asked if there was ,fitment fre!n the water company that they would install and maintain the aping. Mr, Maguire stated a fee contri lon, in eu of construction, could be set up as a condition. The aetu ost of tre nstruction could be determined after working w th /Wate �%mpany, and th ity would be maintaining tsp landscaping. Bill Silva, Deputy eer, suggested modifyi condition 10 to require the applicant to in landscaping and irriga or contribute to the future City beauti ject. Motion. Move Blakesley, seconded by Chitiea, to ad' the Resolution approviZnno cation to CondiVianal Use Permit 87 -19 with dification of conditio require the applec ant to install the la caging and irrigatontribute 10 future beautification. Motion car d by the followi z ES COMMISSIONERS; BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, COMMISSIONERS; NONE K. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 87 -01 - HARRY C'S - A consideration to modify, suspend; or r2vo a an entertainment permit granted for a disc jockey doing vocals and playing records nightly in conjunction with a restaurant /night cluy, located at 10877 Foothill Boulevard. L. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 88 -01 - HARRY C'S - A request to conduct like comedy acts, sports ce a ril;tes promoting sports teams, lip -sync contests, hair and clothing fashion shows, and a request to continue "disc jockey" doing vocals and playing records nightly in conjunction with a restaurant /night club, located at 10877 FooW ll Sow evird. 0 to Al X1410 0 �/ Planning Commission Minutes -15- November 30, 1988 c"\) -11 Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report and letters from the Sheriff's Department and Foothill Fire Protection District. Chairman McNipl opened the public hearing. Harry Histen, applicant's attorney, introduced Paul Duran, night manager. Paul Duran, 91.58 Conifer Lane, stated he had transferred to Rancho Cucamonga in July 1988. He discussed the number of calls reported on Ue Sheriff's report and indicated they had dropped in frequency since the last meeting. He indicated the two "Man With A Gun" calls were initiated by the restaurant. one of them was an off -duty police officer and the other was for an individual who asked the bartender to hold his jacket and said there was a gun in it. He indicated the restaurant makes calls to be sure order is maintained. He felt thAy had been cooperating with the Sheriff's Department and indicated they were forcing people to Wait outside, rather than allowing them in to overcrowd the bar. Jim Engelbart, 92 Kansas, Redlands, Entertainment Manager, wanted to continue to work with the community. He stated they had met with City staff and eliminated entertainment items which were of concern. He discussed the proposed entertainment and. stated acts would be screened in advance to eliminate any potential problems. Mr. Histen stated that on the October 9 overcrowding situation, the ueual Aft doorman had called in sick and A waiter was counting the exiting patrons. The waiter forgot to reset the counter after reporting the -count and they therefore thought more people had exited and let in too many people. He indicated they have upgraded their security staff. He also reported that the seven alarm ca71s were caused by a new chef who did not know how to properly set the alarm. 6e suggested allowing limited entertainment expansion for a short period of time to demonstrate that they could operate satisfactorily. Robert Peppler, Raofho Cucamongc Sheriff's station, indicated that Harry C's had made improvements, but the Department's position is that they don't know how an expansion of entertainment would impact the Sheriff's Department. Hearing no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Blakesley expressed concern that the establishment should broaden its appeal to the community. He didn't object to some of 'she proposed entertainment expansion, He felt there had been some improvement, but ha was uneasy about going ahead with expansion and supported continued probation. Commission ^r Emerick felt that when behavior was not appropriate there should be discipline. He supported continuing probation and revoking the current entertainment permit. Mr felt harry C's had made empty promises. Commissioner Tolstoy felt the managers had shown poor judgment in the past. He felt any person with experience should have been able is see there was overcrowding and they should have acted before the Fire Department arrived. He preferred to continue probation for another 120 days and then perhaps allow expansion a little at a time. lea 411 0 Planning Commission Minutes -16- November 30, 1988 Q,)7 - 1a Commissioner Chitiea did not feel the time was appropriate to expand the permit. She wanted to see sustained improvement before expansion and would prefer to extend the probation for 180 days instead of 120 days. Chairman McNiel indicated that Harry C's was first presented to the City as a "first class restaurant" and "uniformed" security was reinterpreted to include someone in a business suit to avoid turning away clientele. He felt expansion of the entertainment permit would not help the dinner business. He did not feel there had been sufr�rient improver nt to support expansion, but felt the current permit did not n d to be revoked. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, suggested taking the two items separately. Motion: Moved by Blakeslee, seconded by Tolstoy, to continue Entertainment Permit 87 -01 for 120 days. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: C044ISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, MCNIEL, TOLST ^'Y NOES: COWAISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE carried Commissioner Chitiea indicated she voted against the cc,itinuance only because she would prefer to have the item continued for 180 days, Motion: Moved by Blakesiey, seconded by Tolstoy, to direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial without prejudice for Entertainment Permit 88 -01 for the December 14, 1988 Consent L.iendar. 'Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried approved Tentative Tract Ma consisting of lots s of land In the Low Medium D aced north of Highland Av Milliken, south and east of the Deer Creek Channel - A . S. Cindy Norris, Assistant Pla staff report. Chairman McNiel public hearing. Steve , applicant, supported the staff re -ort. RWR V/ 7 +� Planning Commission Minutes -17_ November 30, 1988 C, P -13 EN S K ! 5 f 4 P R t M f R i 8 Har,.y c IS Rancho Co, - unonga Proposed Promotions Sunday -9 :00 P.M. Live stand up comedy, t-fyo = thYee professional comedians that perform live dialogue on stage, these comedians have appeared such places a- the Laff Strap comedy store etc. The show is set up thru a professional talent agency call F~xrah Productions out of Calton. Time of the show is approximately 90 minutes. Monday -5,00 6 :00 -p.m. start Monday Nite Footiaall, also we would tie in halftime and after th, game appearances of sports celebrities ANh or professional footba3,l. V-. �r cheerleader and College cheerleaders qP promoting their teams schedule. Tuesday 31:30 P.M. A professional Lyp Sync Contest, similisx to the nationally kncx n T.V. show " Putti_n On The Hits % B,.rer a:.ners mock: sing to their favorite music , Wanesday -5,00 P.M. start a fashion night. Harry C'S runs hair and clothing fashion shows. Cottmuni.ty involvement and teamwork is stressed on this evening as Harry C'S get local merchants involved wn promoting their bosiviss by supplying mcdels and clothing. Thursday- 11;30 - Miss Hawaii,n Tropic Beauty Pageant, tie -6r, w th nationally known sun care and swimWear company. A professional, tactfully conducted swimsuit contest that feature many professional models. Grand prize to include placettent in Faces Inter::at;onal I Talent and marketing magazineland also a six weiK corne.c -,al model, workshop. This pageant has appeal to females as we! ! as .,ales because they have a chance to see the Latest swimsuit att;xe modeled. 801 Tn City Center Dr,ye 41 'odlonds, CoVorrnq 9j34' w 8160 E1tTTERTAINlV ENT PERMIT APPLICATION Applicants for entertainment permits shall complete the following quest onaire PLEASE PRINT OR 7W E A. The name and permanent address of applicant: Harry C's - -- 10877 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA B. The 'tame, proposed and current, if any, and business address of the applicant: Harry C's 10877 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA Harry Chan C. A detailed description of the proposed entertainment, including type of en'ertainmamt, and number of persons engaged in the entertainment (may attach seperate sheets if necessary): See attached. D. The date or day-of-week, hours and location of entertainment (attach floorplan), and the admission fee, if any, to be chatrged: Entertainment 7 days a week. Sunday' hrough Saturday 8:00pm fill 2 :00am. Admission fee is dependent upon success of promotion. To be determined in future. r 1 0 0 V It F. The name(s) of the person(s) responsible for the management or supervision of applicant's business and of any entertainment: Harry Chan _ Owner Paul Duran Operational manager Dave Taylor - Operational manager Gregorl 3nugard - Operational manager Jim Engelbart - Entertainment manager F. A statement of the nature and character of applicant's business, if any, to be carried vi. uL conjunction with such entertainment, including whether or not alcohol will be served as part of such business: A restaurant - night club with D.J. entertainment that sells food and alcohol on the premises. Open for lunch, dinner and Sunday brunch and also providin(R entertainment. G. Whether or not the applicant or any person responsible for the management or supervision of applicant's business have been, within the previous ten years, convicted of a crime, the nature of such offense, and -he .sentence received therefor including conditions of parole or probation, if any: No. H. Whether or not applicant has ever had any permit or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or provision of entertainment revoked, including the rate thereof and name of the revoking agent,: No. Any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application shall be grounds for denial of the application for an entertainment permit. C,,q - 6 Attachment C. Mg To continue existing D.J. entertainm it playing recants with D.J. vocals. Tc, Add: LIVE JAll: Local 4 piece jazz Hand to play 2 nights a week. FASHION NIGHT: Tie in with local businesses, such as, Hair Salons and Clothing Stores to promote the latest fashions. COMMUNITY NIGHT - Tie in with local businesses, apartment complexes and condomin- ium communities in promoting a special night where that group is the focal point. LIVE STAND -UP COMEDY: Professional comedians, 2 to 3 an evening entertain during a 60 to 90 minute show. Acts are book;, " through an entertainment agency. TALENT NIGHT: Lyp Sync acts, singers,.slssnc15ft, comedians, magicians and other talented acts compete for cash and prizes, BOXING +& OTHER SPECIAL EVENTS: Occasional telecasting of closed circuit boxing matches and other special events. CONCERTS: Occasional Live Entertainment concerts that would feature top name acts in the recording industry, booked through c2encies. M ~-170 :0877 FOOTHILL 80UUvARD • RANCHO CUCkMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 • M4 4800799 4 (714) W-1444 CID- 17 ADDENDUM TO ATTACHMENT C. HARRY C'S PROPOSED ENTERTAINMENT [E.P. 89 -OZI Update 3!?7189 Under FASHION NIGHT .ADD Live models will model only daily evening wear and fashionable attire. No nudity or see through fabrics or wet fabric,+. Under COMMUNITY NIGHT ADD Harry C's offers a selected group special prices on drinks and a complimentary food buffet. This activity is i low priced banquet service for specific groups on a slow night. Under LIVE STAND UP COMEDY NIGHT ADD Harry C's wil:', feature the same comedians as HRO,SHOWTIAE, and ones that appear at the Laff Stop and Comedy Stcre. Under TALENT NIGHT DELETE the word dancers. 10877 fOOTKLL BUtSI.E`JAR5 • %i,NCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNSA 91730 • (713) 980-0799 • (7i4,) 935.)"4 _O (.0 _Z E Q J I. z W Q Lu Lu Z d 0 u- 0 z uj Cr 1�.. Lu a City of Rancho C u C m o n g a " PART i Uniform j ApplicatidS APN "i'a.tf ,,,•� FILE GENERA. IN ORMATION,REGUIREC �aq NAME O 4 OPOSFO PROJECT ��S RELATED FILES LOC TION OF PROJECT ODRES �U d'77 f-e it/ 1u APPUCANT§ NAME TELEPHONE OWNS 'S NAME TELEPHONE X ADDRESS f[. C /L���' lJL✓ �rDn` /i u /off ,� REVIEW REQUESTED ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMJT NON CONSTRUCTION* • DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT (ZONE CHANGE) • GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT • MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ❑ MINOR EXCEPTION Q PRELIMINARY REVIEW* 16 NTERTAINMENT PERMIT is PROJECT DESCRIPTION I & U ❑ TECHNICAUDESIGN REVI✓; W — COMMERCIAL OR INDU`,vilAL* ❑ TECHNICAL/DESIGN REVIEW -- RESIDENTIAL* • TOTAL DEVELOPMENT ❑ BASIC STANDARDS D OPTIONAL STANDARDS • CUSTOM LOT /SUBDIVISION • DESIGN REVIEW (REAPPLICATION) j a VARIANCE a a a OWNER CERTIFICATION ! t i CERTIFY T4AT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER. 1 ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. AGENT OF OWNS MUST ATTACH A LETTER OF 1 AUTHORIZATIO FR QM THE LEGAL OWNER. DATE. SIGNATURE: x C+:'y� �- PRINT NAME & TITLE: �! C1 � -v L P.W �A. FOOTHILL FIRE PROTEGFIION DIST.VCr MEMORANDUM —RECEIVED— MY OF RANCHO CUCWNGA ptANN1Nd Q44 joM MAR 28 1M as t TO: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: Ralph Crane, Deputy Piro Marshal: DATE: 3/27(89 SUBJEC1%. Harry C's Activity 12/14/88 - 3/27/89 Responding to your request for information relating, to harry C's since December 14, 1988, our files indicate the following: Calls for service I information request (race car - exterior) Violations 0 (one pending 4 1,057 issued 10 /8188) In4 ,°ction Activity 2 Night inspections - no violations Note: The information request above was from Jim Enge'lbart, an employee of Harry C's and asked our concerns about a proposed use dial playing a race car exterior of the building it: a grassy area. The request came well in advance of the proposed use and indicated a desire to maintain compliance with our fire safety concerns. During both unannounced night inspections, District Inspectors dealt with a cooperative staff and a subsequent estimated count of occupants verified the validity of the lounge hosts "counters ". �,0 " FROM: March 24, 1959 Eugene Gilmore, Rancho Cucumong f TTY OF RMCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Captain a Sheriff's Station TO: Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBJECT: HARRY C'S Listed below you will find a :areakdown of calls for service at Harry C's located at 10677 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga. The available calls for service cover the period from January 7, 1969, to March 21, 1989. DAY OF WEEK NUMBER OF CALLS RECEIVED Sunday 5 -RECEIVED— Monday Q Ci tbF #tAElCM OAMAM Tuesday 1 q,A NING orim, Wednesday 2 24 Thursday 3 ��MA1R7t Saturday - 3 TOTAL NUMBER OF :ALLS: 15 TYPES OF CALLS NUMBER OF CALLS RECEIVED Disturbance Calls 4 Suspicious Circumstances 1 Assault with a Deadly Weapon 2 Grand Theft Auto 1 Vandalism 2 Petty Theft 1 Non - Injury Accident 1 Fire Calls 2 Repossession Call 1 TOTAL NUMBER. OF CALLS: 15 The total number of calls received during this time period for Friday and Saturday nights is six, which equates to 400o of the total calls for service at Harry C "s. The total number of calls received during this time period for Friday, Saturday, and Sunday nights is 11, which equates to 73% of the total calls for service at Harry C's. It is my opinion that the number of calls for service is directly related to the activity at the business. With the expansion of the entertainment permit, activity at the business will increase and -o will the number of calls for service. Submitted for your information. RP :EG :Ias --- CITY OF RX ,CHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 12, 1989 TO: Chairman and Nkmbert of the Plarring Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Assistant planner dJ+ ts.— — -, SUBJECT': ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TFNTATIYB TRACT 13898 - NUNEZ - A rest aenzi a l suvol vi si on of I single family lots-an- 2 . 47 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corder of Lemon and London Avenues - APN; 201- -251 -57 and $8. Associated with this project is Tree Removal Permit 88.58, requesting the removal of 10 Eucalyptus globules, 3 fruit trees and 4 pine trees. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested; Approval of the subdivis4on map, grading plan, and issuance of a Negative :tslaration. 8. Project Density: 2.83'6':elling units per acre C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning; North - Vacant; Low density Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). South - Lemon Avenue and vacant beyond; Law- Meditm3 Density Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). East - Existing single family residences; Low Density Residential District (2-4 dsjellin; units per acre). Best - Existing Single Family Residences; Low Density Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Desiginationst Project Site -. Low Residential (2-4 dwelling unity per acre) North - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Mddium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Test - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) ITW E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13898 - NUNEZ April 12, 1989 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The site it located northeast of the intersection of Lemon and Archibald Avenues and slopes approximately 3 percent from r4rth to south. The site' is currently occupied with a single family residence which f ►ants auto Lemon Avenue, and a barn and corral. The -, misting sing e farily residence is i.)posed to be incorN ,4ted into the subdivision. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project was or finally reviewed 'iy the Planning Tss %n oa January 25, 108"9. At that time the Commission had concerns about the project since lots to the west were larger in size ara equestrian - oriented. The Commission felt 'zhe proposed Ibis would be out of character- with the r yea. .he Commission also felt that the width of the proposed 'lots should be increased in order to be more in keeping with th(- existing lots to the east. The Comm.isstoa ga- + the applicant the option of either losing one lot or submit* ig a streetscape design which would reduce the apparent densia• of the project. The applicant decided to eliminate ore lot and has resubmitted a revised project consisting of 7 lots. The width of the lots range from 65 to 76 feet eihich is comp—We to those lots to the east, which are approximately 78 feet in width, Proposed lots within the subdivision now range from 9,9910 to 19,831 square feet and average 11,479 square feet in size. The • tistini dwelling unit will occupy the southermost lot of 19,831 square feet. 3. Design Review Cammittee: The Design Review Committee (Kroutil, ea, o s oy reviewed 'ne project on December 8, 1988 and recommended approval with the following condition: 1. A decorative wall, compatible with adjacent tracts to the east, should be provided along the western tract boundary. On Winch 2, 1989 the Committee (Emerick, Kroutil, WNiel) reviewed the concept of a seven lot subdivision and recommended approval. LJ 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13898 - NUNEZ April 12, 1989 Page 3 C. Grading Committee. The Grading Committee reviewed and approved the project on December 5, 1988 subject to the condition listed im; the attarhsd Resolution. The revised T Lot subdivision was reviewed and approved by the Grading Committee on March 15, 1989 su'')ject to the condition listed in the attached Resolution. D. TrcF P.amnoval Permit: In conjunction with the proposed tentative tracl!- 054n..7the applicant has submitted free Removal Permit 88 -58 requesting the removal of 10 Eucalyptus globulus, 3 fruit trees and a Tine trees. The Eucalyptus trees are all located within the right of way for Liberty Street and are proposed for removal when the street is eventually widened. Seven of the 10 Eucalyptus are either dead or are stamps and therefore are not subject to the replacement criteria of the Tree Preservatiun Ordinance. The remaining 3 Eucalyptus trees were apparently once part of an east /west trending windrow. However, the windrow does not continue east of London Avenue, nor does it continuo west of Archibald Avenue. tine to this situation, the removal of the threi Eucalyptus trees would not disrupt the continuity of the windrow since it extends only for a distance of approximately 250 feet along the north and northwest of the proposed project. Staff would recommend, however, that due to the size of the trees p�riposed for removal (24, 30, and 36 inches in diameter) that an enhanced aarkway tr -Qnt 1- Provided along the south side of Liberty Street. r,.@ e3w_,!ished street tree for Liberty Street is Quercus sober (Cork Oak) and staff would rccommmend that rather than planting the trees 20 feet on center which would result in the planting of 6 trees, that 10 trees be planted instead. The pines proposed for removal are only 4 -8 inches in diammetar and are not subject to the r: placement criteria in thk, Tree Preservation Ordinance. The fruit trees proposed for removal are arse not subject to tree replacement. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Environmental--Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental ;,+pacts as a result of this project. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate if the tentative tract is approved. ru E -'3 PLANNING COWNISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13898 - NUNEZ April 12, 1989 Page 4 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS; The project is consistent with the General Plan an a evelopment Code. The project will not be detrimental to the public health or s,F- .e'ty, or cause nuisance or significant environmental impacts, ro addition, the proposed use, subdivision map and concepta) grading plan together with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has hewi advertised as a public hearing in ne -Da�Ty— Report newspaper and notices were sent to all proper 7y- owners witnih XO feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract 13898 through the adoption o€ 'the attached Resolutioa of Approval with Conditions, approve ''ree Removal Permit 88-58, and issve a Negative Declaration. Resp Ru y s ed Brt city r BB:BN:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilix "tion Map Exhibit "B" - Subdivision Map Exhibit "C" Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Tree Removal Plan Staff Report of January 25, 1989 Minutes from Planning Commission meeting of January 25, 1959 Resolution of Approval with Conditions v E LOW yQ T f. i CITY CF PLANNIN, DIVMGkNi 'TH ITEM= 7'A1;rA %U&- TITLE:IT r�r'r�.�zgrro�r n�rP EXHIATT = -..-A- LE_ Original Poor Quality I <.i! • LOW 1 4 . ..CW wt z "=' . If M,w ale• :+b...t �`. 5} { F C.t a � a rt1W 0..l aw• • J 1�• •( MIMGtiss C6 ~� ► 11 •�.Aa V. 3 �J 1 �' 4 J NORM l 6Y, RAINCHO CLJCAINIONGA TrIU: - -'VBD1VC1cK1 Mgfe PLANNING DFVEM EXHIBIT: SCALE, C� Original Poor Quality w $ 3 Ii', ar 4 9w M N eo A, RSV I`O 1H CITY CFA MEM -��50-614WY-e `�N C AA TIME: +�P�c �f1 d GP. �DI�ttG �iA,tl PLANNING DIVISION EXHIE --(�--- SCALE, 7 Original Poor Quality DR IWWSA sF !=_ jk Qa LJ j -:7 *In Qwl 13 pr-opoicA -gr (et&ak,_) . &ftv.,_Mav, are awr dkeL &Y- MWT5. a rt 44 TAMVENUi it rrEm.. :rg,�Znrl TnU: T999_9aLAIO Ae__ P,,,4A/ EXHIErY, -2— scALE: 1� _q, -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 25, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nssen, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13898 - NUNEZ residential ubdiv sion of s ng a family lots on 2.47 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of Lemon and London Avenues - APN: 201 - 251 -57 and 58. Associated with this project is Tree Removal Permit 88 -58, requesting the removal of 10 Euca'�vptus Globulus, 3 fruit trees and -4 pine trees. I. PEOJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the subdivision map, grading p and , assuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 3.2 dwelling units per acre C. Surrounding lend Use and Zoning: North - acan ; Low Density REsidantial District (2 -4 dwelling units per acres„ South Lemon Avenue and vacant beyond; Loa - Medium Density Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). East - Existing single family residences; Low Density Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). kest - Existing Single Family Residences; Low Density Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). D. General Plan Designations: ro ec 'blZee - Low e'R ids ential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) North Lore Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) East - Loa Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Hest - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) (' A PLANNING COMMISSTnN STAFF REPORT TT 13898 - NGNEZ January ?5, 1989 Page 2 11 Site Characteristics: The si A is located northeast of the itarsect on of emon and Archibald Avenues and slop_. approximately 3 percent from north to south. The site is currently occupied with a single family residence which front. onto Lemon Avenue, and a barn and corral. The existing single family residence is proposed to be incorporated into the subdivision. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project as currently proposed is for tract suFM`vision only. According to the applicant, design review for house plans will ae submitted at a later date. Lots within the' subdivision range V -om 8,545 to 19,831 square feet. The average lot size is .0,044 square feet. The existing dwelling will occupy the southernmost lot of 19,831 square feet. B. Design Review Committee: ?he Design Review Committee (Kroutil, unitiea, To stoy ) reviewed the project on December 8, 1988 and approved it with the following condition: 1) A decorative wall, compatible with adjacent tracts to the east, sh,�11d be provided along the western tract boundary. C. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed and approved tite project onDecember 5, 1988 subject to the condition lasted in the attached Resolution. D. Tree Removal Permit: In conjunction with the proposed tentative roc map, he applicant has submitted Tree Removal Permit 88 -58 requesting the removal of 10 Eucalyptus Globulr- 3 fruit trees and 4 pine trees. The Eucalyptus trees are a located within the right of way for Liberty Street and art proposed for removal when the street is eventually widened. Seven of the 10 Eucalyptus are either dead or are stumps and therefore are not subject to the replacement criteria of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The remaining 3 Eucalyptus trees were apparently once part of an east /west trending windrow. However, the windrow does not continue east of London Avenue, nor does it continue west of Archibald Avenue. Due to this situation, the removal of the three Eucalyptus trees would not disrupt the continuity of the windrow since it extends only for a distance of approximately 250 feet along the north and IF - 10 PLANNING COMMISSTnN STAFF REPORT TT 13e`.i - NUNEZ Janua,.i 25, 1989 Page 3 northwest of the propoed project. Staff would recommend, however, that due to the size of the trees proposed for removal, 24, 30, and 36 incs in. diameter, that an enhanced parkway treatment be provided along the south side of Liberty Street. The established street tree for Liberty Street is Quercus suber (Cork Oak) and staff would recommend that rather than planting these trees 20 feet, on center which would result in the planting of 6 trees, that 10 trees be planted instead. The pines proposed fc, +r removal are only 4 -8 inches in diameter and are not subject to the replacement criteria in the Tree Preservatsor Ordinance. The fruit trees proposed for removal are also not subject to tree replacement. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESZ -01T: Staff has completed the Environmental ec is and found no significant adverse environmental _impacts as a result of this project. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate if the tentative 'tract is approved. III. "ACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and the eve opment Code. The project will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisance or significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use,, subdivision map and conceptual grading plan together with ttie• recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with the a -nolicable provisions of the Development Code and City s'`.anzards. IV. CORRESPOW ACE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in Vie afTy —tie ort newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Comission approve enta. ve Tract 13898 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions, approve Tree Removal Permit 88 -58, and issue a Negative Declaration. )5Y mod, r BB:BN:js F- )a PLANNING COW- JISSInN STAFF REPORT TT 13598 - NUNEEZ January 25, 1989 Page 4 Attach,ment3:� Exhibit "A" - Site Utilizatien reap. Exhibit "B" - Subdivision Map Exhibit "C" A Conceptual Trading Man Exhibit "D.' - Tree Removal Plan Resolution of Approval with Condit'ans •.rY w ,r. �Mr,rn- FjQ ( 4�! +x nw w.i < IIINNNIII t J 1 1 rLY M �Raaa�r a4Mrw �. [` wnw�.•`n .Yt7lYYrr`.`e— I ,r•arx. r�d� � 1� N 4 ti k ; IC •-•w -+ M+w's�vi r+.r covert t ,/ si E a k'XIST. sltiGtE' rai � 1'K,MiL � KL8' dfK ' L% . A s>•i. b, a� • k q {� "{"" G'17MkS1 �^-++ CpURC , a r 1.G1iY E tbt r "MO.—d � t� f y fl vacwiT• VACANT k4gOCUM V.►ca,MS� rl 1' s 1 7 t CYFY CF RANCID CU tai d .TR_ ZA..7-l.y . r �9cr /38 A IN DIVNM EXHIBIT' ,. LE- is -- t)riginal Poor Quaiify .� �. L.ow U .eIt tV "' 7 c .i•� +wc•a F�vn•.y Fw x 1 7 ZJJ S LA NM T,�� TTY = T iviA / %11E. % 1�f1�T _20_q Ti'itiE= EXHim ; -- SCALE -,- 'wM VK'.4wT w Y 1 {•444{{rtw.Ti / R �LM%IN�e��R�� 6ir oC 03` P•t D �L All .� �. L.ow U .eIt tV "' 7 c .i•� +wc•a F�vn•.y Fw x 1 7 ZJJ S LA NM T,�� TTY = T iviA / %11E. % 1�f1�T _20_q Ti'itiE= EXHim ; -- SCALE -,- f r b -- 4 s is -- --� Tar - - - -;' �y3a 1 CT. 46 14 m a QC) & TE,v.= /3228 T[•Pi.E= _Cl��c,�PrcA� 6RC7 /NG t' EXiNdST.— _- SCALE.- E—i, q�C^tR.' O ►DfA �C4TIC� 040 1 0 �c nt a; It s.a4 NGO SR s 0 846�f/• '�i�OC. wui a:+etwe�er 066 9.V. 1 d� Wt-i . jj o"!; Jim ! met% %./. r Z, cis d cu C txo 0 A AL T : .F-XHIIR c. SCALE: mis a bn— Weri'ging " ciawn � aria not seen to encr,, :h on the neighbors. ported the Commissioner ick felt the intent of the 20 to rck was to avoid the look of too muc '1&i+jj mass, He felt the am the street would show an intrusion of the ing into the open , ut as the neighbors did lot appear to optaose to the p he stall, art the variaw -A. Motion: Moved by To,s:ny, s by C;sitiea, to adopt the Resolution approving Variance 88 -.27. Mo rrie the following vote: AYES: COMMISSION CHr.IEA, ENERICK, , TO'.STOY NOES: CO ERS: NONE ABSENT: ISSIONERS: BLA M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASELSSMEr'.7 AND TEMTATIVE TRACT 13898 WNEZ A residential subdivis -of 8 s ng a aarr y Tuts- on--2.47 acres o and in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dtelling rnits per acre), located Lt the northwest corner of Lemon and London Avenues - APH: 201 - 231 -57 and 58. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He recorr--tended dele=tion of Lemon Street under the list of required treet improvements, because the work had been completed urder a City contrar Chairman McNiel opes�pd t�e public hearing. Henry Nunez, applicar.t, thanked tha staff for Oeir professionalism and courta:;y. John 1'r>ng, 54?6 Vaiinda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga„ owned the property to the north and stated that Liberty Street orie rally was south of his property, but when the developer to the crust built their lots, they moved the ;street north III feet. He did not want the laycat proposeC with else cul-de -sac curving up into hie property. Hearing no further t/,lt'jeony, the public "2sring was closed. Brad Buller, City Planner, s a.ted the issue of aiigAarent of street- within the property % the north was r ,jt the issue being considered tonight, He said the the only street h'sue being considered was the amount of street dedication being required from the northern lot, of tt,a Nunez property, Chairman tic -,.el aske(, the Odth of the lots. j Mr. Murphy rr ­e 65 feet wide except for lot 1, which was 150 feet by 131 fe- s. Planning Comi5sion ;Minutes -It1- January 25, 1989 Commissioner Chitiea stated that even Viough the homers `) the xest or Archibald wore the same zoning, in realii^i they were on larger lots. Sho felt oil the narrow lots seemed out of character with the adjacent existing neighborhood. Commissioner Tolstoy asked what .he ingress would be fo. 'he lot to the w^st of lots 4. 5, 6, 7, and 8. Mr. Buller responded that tiic, grave an etsement to the nryr th of lot 8 and would have access a'Ff Liberty Street. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, stated that Liberty Street was not being constructed as nart of this d.•velopment, and the existing dirt road aoulO remain as access for the wastp.en lct. Commissioner Tolstoy asked why ';sberty was not being constructed. Mr. Hanson re,ponded that it d-;d not meet the miniMA.1 width for maintenance, but a fee would be collected from the applicant for future develop.: *,nt. Chairman MOW did not feel tL ;re was a s ^rfiict With the lots on Archibald, but felt there rppaared to be a conflict with the lots across Londor, Avenue. � He felt one lot should be e:iminated, because wider lots would make the tract more compatible with the neighborhood. Mr. Coleman pointed out that the lots to the east of London A%-nue were wider hat shallower, with the squar4 footage being approximately the same as the proposed devel- pent. Commissioner Chitlea felt the narrawer lots would still give tha appearance of a higher rienswty, anJ she agreed that one lot should be eliminated, Commissioner Enerick felt increasing the setback could mitigate the density feeling. Chairman McNiei reopened the public hearing to ask Mr. Nunez if he we'.ald be milling to request a continuance to 11low time to rest.bm+it the tract map. Mr. Nunez stated ,2 felt he could set this house. back to relieve the dense fee -ing. He stated he planned to subdivide and build the homes. " hairman NOW staled that if he could provide homes that would give an air of space there was a chance h.: could keep eight tots. Mr. Nunez stated the square footage of the lots was similar to those across London Averme, and he felt nice houses would be more attractive than the oerimeter wail across the street. Commissioner Tolstoy said he preferred elimination of one lot, but was open to looking at blc� design-. Commissioner Chitied stated ti ;e larger lots to the west are equestrian, which AML can be in conflict with non - equestrians smaller lots. Planning Come ssion Winutes -Z1• Jarmary 25, 1989 a `� Mr. Buller stated that it would take two months to go tt rough Des%u Review process. Mr. Nunez stated he was willing to waive the time limit and requested a continuance W allow him time to return with elevations. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by McNiel, to continue Envirommntal Assessment and Terltstive Tract 13899 to March 22, 1989. Notion carried tai time following vote: AYES: COM'MISSLONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: CO.eiISSIONERS: kUE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLi.t - carried KPOLM 4UVMi'lUMj% - A J- =quciw' w ak I" % W­ ..' ,.v Yr+. v...., ..,. ;•....... �acs o e General Plan lZid u,e map from Medium Rasidenti 4 11ing units per acre) to low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwellin, s per a for those parcels located on the'south side of Le tern.:ng appr tely 1,100 feet east of Archibald Avenue arks t ce1 ora the north s f Highland extending 780 feet east of Arch' "Avenue - APN: 201 - 252 -01, 04, 21, 22, 39, 40, 41, 42, and 43. :off Gravo", Assista fanner, presented the staff Chairman McNiel- opened the Ila hearing. Lawrence Gaiefsk- 5393 Jad, Amendment. He felt lowering congestion. Scott Anderson, 9848 Liberty, I Medium. Wncho Cucamonga, favored the would help cut future traffic , supported the change to Low- Hearing no further testa ::;e public hearing closed. Motion: "Dved by a�, seconded by °olstoy, dopt the Resolution recommerviin, app _ r Environmental Assessment and al Plan Amendment 89 -01C. Motion lid by the following vote: AYES: SIONERS: CHITIEA, EMER%CK, MCHIEL, TOLSTOY WES: OMlISSIONERS: NONE COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY - carried Planning Commission Minutes -12- --I(� January 25, 1989 qP ,ESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13898, AND RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO.. 88 -58, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 7 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 2.47 AIRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT €24 DWELLIhIG UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LEMOM AVENUE AND LONDON AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201231 -57 & 58. A. Recitals. (1) Henry Nunez has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13898 and the related Tree Removal Permit No. 88 -58 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject requost is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 12th of April 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing an the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFOkT, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are 'true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidencs presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on April 12, 1PS9, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Comission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application aprilies to property located at the northwest corner of Lemon and London Avenues with a street frontage of 111 feet on Lemon Avenue and 576 fleet along London Street and ',s presently improved with one single family residence and a barn-, and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and designated for Low Density Residential, the property to the oyth of that site consists of vacant land designated for Low - Medium density residential= the property to the east is deveiopel with single family residences in the Loa Density Residential District, and the property to the Nest is developed with single family residences in the Low Density Residential District. PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13898 , NUNEZ April 12, 1989 Page 2 (c) Proposed lot sizes are consistent with the existing surrounding neighborhoods. (d) The property contains 10 Eucalyptus globules trees, 7 of which are either stumps or dead. The remaining three trees are proposed for removal due to the widening of Liberty Street, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referen?ed public hearing and upon the specific ftndings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or imprmvcments of the tentative tract is consistent with the �' neral Flan, Deve'topmen•, Code, and specific plans: and %c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and (d) The design of the subdivision is net likely to Aft cause substantial environ=rnial dairage and - avoidOle injury to humans and wildlife or their habitats and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not co►iflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Comission hereby finds and certifies that the prcJ'ect has been reviewed and considered in complianr:- with the California Envivonmental Quality Art of 19?0 and, further, this Commission hereby i„ues to Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and coaaclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and overy condition set Earth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 0 E7 -:-=> PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO.. TT 13898 - WNEZ April 12, 1989 Page 3 Tentative Tract 1) Overhead Utilities a. London Avenue - The exiting overhead utilities (tel ecowuni cation and electrical) un the projec° side of London Avenge shall be undergrounded from t`r ,�i re exitng pale on Lemon Avenue to the northerly pole on London Avenue and the ;r westerly to the terminus pole on Lib• rty Street, p, -for to public itep,�ovement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cast for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as 'It occurs on tl,e opposite side of the street. b. Lemon Avenue - k) in -112u fee c"s contribution to the future undergrounding of ,he existing overhead utilities Nekeco=trications and electrical) on the project side of Lemon Avenue shall be W d to tie City prior to the approval of the Findl Map. The fee shall be the full City adopted ciit aans:,ir times the length from the center of London Avenue to the west project boundary. 2) A decorative wall, compatible with the adjacent tt�., t to the east, shall be provided -along the western tract bounde:y. plans 0all be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the f3suanee of building permits_ The applicant shall work with adjacent property owners to resolve any double (tell situations prior <-o *he issuance of building permits. 3) Drainage shall be accented fror the westerly properties in a private drainage easemeni_ 4) Tree Removal Permit 88 -58 is approved subject to replacement with 10 Quercus_ suber along the south side of Liberty Street. Infested wood from cut Eucalyptus trees, shall be chipped, removed and brr;ed at a damp site or tarped to the ground for a mit:imum of six months, aealing the tarp edges with soil, to prevent emerging borer 4eetles from reinfesting other trees or wood. 6. The Secretary to this Comrtssion shrall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. -:�� PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION No. TT 13838 - NUNEZ April 12, 1989 Page 4 APPROVED AND AWIPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 1989. PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA BY: Larry T. WWI, Chairman ATTEST: dram auiter, secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Ct4mission of the City of rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and ad^9ted by the P14nning Coivtissiot4 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comrission held on the 12th day of April 1989, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CowrSSIONERS: AB, ;NT: COMMISSIONERS; a _f 0 s y� v 2S Y H u 0 I it u r yLp �C�IS. t O`` Y yy r i V O• ro Y.� Y J y` y a G O ppC M l wu ■ tlj Y« ONAr y y I a `a �g �`. �i v'rJ °'��w. JJ��tt�P 0 o udop1 1(.f(1.� p••� {N, �8�w 8E y Co.�CyhV c� n,Yi. Q, r. d Ar Y 6 yV LL pp ■rYN yf �m CV p G 11 L O C A- yW Oy qyt `E S CY^ �. s. a. 7 V IMe1 L4�OGY.�Y Yry`�4Mtly� 3py)a OaVY~�QYn Y61w6 Cq�$p qp M Av �Gl 6L�•Y.MV�� �a g I o. aua « V •�`u+ Be x�• �p�n Cti�O �.�� � Yq�p�1yFdy CY Qs 3�"•"�C�'�"ac�u • Cro SY N� s�M.«. o .esO�V CO Y� • +C� �Q �^6 C. ��22�� R. b «�C _ �Cq ^ «tla.,.�q 9���0 a {6y H .•i«IY «gL uq O Y,.R. Xt3r f SON C.. NO .103' • ro 9 w n &�i � sw ps t N SU ytyyyy! O o-.8 q y n �H H aY`cP.r4 � C p �.. U �p vy �tiN PLC i� C w .^i ` cCi' i yu a.YVY ■, U vsiG C +yv •D O NC� a 6��j p.� au! oYa ay •yp y Si qu =��YQ•'¢au6y6y EEu aey ■gG.N6 �� �Lq �O i. �T.cd � °Yy +> y ^ {S w3eiYg y� � �C Vn. y'y� TyOy`Cq��lLCV�aJ� A r V i D ry OOO9 I-a i 6 sY `c VY I� M v1 . w 15 rL..�j e� t N a i�� ^'_ MyN�Yl spej� i V• J a C:g sC O d is epp a E Yw CPPPN X � Z 8,4 .22 pp 0 s y� v 2S Y H u 0 I it u r R-9 •V 01 O cc r +Y i a-isv T-.00. �``s��iS Yom. Nbt y D i.OQY �.O ,. � 3py)a OaVY~�QYn Y61w6 Cq�$p qp M a'JM 6L�•Y.MV�� �a g I o. aua « x�• �p�n Cti�O �.�� � Yq�p�1yFdy d� � Nw N^ a {6y H i' ij •`. �` b V.w `� ou«Ids O °t � V a�'t U �p yN p�•'•V izi Po ea V V• J a C:g sC O d is epp a E Yw CPPPN X � Z 8,4 .22 pp R-9 •V 01 O cc r N 1 S w W a a 5 -Ell $ I rA l ,� i s P �1 Neu V ;Syj 'R$gi LU On. it liy iiN�p ER E% ^ + s� L ~.Y > 6 M N n N +' ` N ERE � ` N O pp9 4 HN O 7, a .@ @ ■ �Ym W�Vj$`•�n�C� gyp.. °uu ®k�j y�zL.++ q. 5--,Os GN �^ O `^03�$•on tla zolis q ,a.0 `d:s ^X'a$: Q�M�L MMN tub s ft it �R1UN {tlY�e uC ®�t Yi+�{Y��m�`� �L {u @�rpN„pwM SLnpgL @j4� H L EC ;M 1y@3'12.1f^ V,it �e �tNp eM� I IM M@CN ij `9�{ aJ a Ell +i0 Lwp O .G jlS q 6 SY N o:i Ss>m �. MtNy! O sy O n PTc 4 @ l 6 yy m y6 .w qm ii } iiii b ■y y �l U .1 s ar V yVy � nC :. y� IC Y C •M!,Qyp '� Nw)_C1uy N0 hN• 4N �.e 10.5! 9 L {� pu V y• g� d� ` yy � • +' r y V a w' � � Y O �• g�w�l � hn `M MM �ggO 44 �L � � �Sy $ �Y � +�«�,�3�y� $ ®�• �N @C O@ y V � � 4 � S�� z w p �O N � p N 1q�$ .1�IO q Cy„�MS` O VVyV IjJ�.vrr ' ppC�11'.�� QM °py p yam' dYs'+I �M j���` SpO� �H�YYS� e�.4 /�'LrS�� i.�'aiia �' �wTgs Alm" _2 ^ «•S'� Lib u $ue .tea^ w Z_i • XF ° «o i Cos O 1_L wP1. N4��UY in N T� i Vw�Y 4 YO`. tle pN CANM G$�! Mri 5i g.VY�. Dk �N 0jytl Gm o�ydQ � yS�T 2 w NN°ia pYV > s{{,, .�~m p V m Oy Angpa am w Min s �SMt �� nN`•S` �DYp �$OW �`. `�f Yg_���� ii +•��Cyg. '@����C .n.@ o° ov` w o °3s't{C �n ggqqyi� a••a`, $�` : »ii j a Q$ I- -z Z��/ y °$ox�Y .y,. s��41�{e � �+s� °.��� '''o @�a"k. s• w,y ypp."x s >Yyiyy. Q"vu S �iO �rtaSc a. ^'� �4`a1i"T 1 a��,lh <a�.ca �.N� Ft•yw m6Y V `4 m V @Mr�.C}�.5 iyy� i6 NO .im NC utv! @Y aeSV aN 0 \ w s1 E I �! I I �. �► j I I `Y `qJr' V O bFA! Ell N 11 8 M1.f0 p0 P OOC y OOOO �T YCIYL.yp +S. lwy�YayN Y, MYutrr 4 byc !A S CA 01 YY ®� E H O ~ C 4 S. C •� tl JJQ M !• N �yG eC E Y 9C L1 -� Y w Y Y O Y N Y �y .O ^ O N. �'�'^ T b Y .- y S 7� Y° ° N 5' ' 1'YO �'\ Q.'�Cl �O�Vp�b CNYYY ^O O1 S� Y S. ^ N � Ai O N � Y Y C W� e O N� Y P A!. � Y O .� 1► �. O�r. tlr � � bb 4W Y •.7�0 ^G�.`Yfl CN 4S A,A nY.W (ai L -} � N b C C /� yp Y. j; y N � �CC � y/♦ ^. � tl T 0u�� �' NyNsa��^� O'N UuO {a� ET �� yL ,vE �4YibG �� MCa Y C L!.! .0 a8 i °q ^q� o , S. ` gY Jq n ff r 541 Y,s rs-' fl $ C- r5 � y{1� ■a YE.�qS OQ N -S ' « w -FH ° 9i r TO Ow Atoll y C lA . - Nom' ad Y1� L6A ytl y�LA M An �HO Q�N b0 Pt S �gY�w'^.Pi. LQ1+tl� ` Mr 6,H1 °ieHra 4 C -Q b N L ■Y �N { ` ^OC�pIY r�/�IIy vQ ^6 ��6)\� oY N � H A H � N .- 4. N 3 M g r N � ' 4 P1 ✓a en ^ 4w � Dl tliJ1 O 6 � ` � @o � Y :b O R = o Y . . HE9_� IS e�■ ai�a��eas L.N BOO C } �.� �. C H 6y^� P q•. tl�/M s`1*iy\ '��Y bl C .yy- 0 N yp� H Cpp .a{yt� M Y �Y Y C ��wAi b ` EYY.V ^�I ■Y N~G � •OV ��8> � WV� �Nf���y Ojy��'s u• °P ^11 oY w at Z, aO ■ ■peL � 7 .'t � Y8 HMY� pp �MN �N Yg E��� ®1 Y �e NY. 1C yNSV Y +r1' �Y�O� --.but- -E {Uld N. {Y� � Ya 0Y 9 Y y® PNBN �.b C�•w YYr��i Ol? C -G . >C tl1`d ,v :c tl C1C Y Yy9 m q U tl Y Ste( Qa OY'tl C Yw `N ^�� O tl L a Ate_. fh 24 �rYO bpi. W VV ��L• �b6 qa YV •c�Ay p� IG' ■wr tY vtCJ p�+. b YptlS� tl;-'fn ` �C/DU. 0p cEb Mp g4YV yC 4ypi' 3.7 4. p N�11 `��C L.� {�• �t y }qA 1Y+L 00 YON bm ^• }*4 C�GL A�4 p Soxtt u ^y 'r ytl Me ■uN G.dY4Yi �b HQ <Rw T 4'OM f'D. N KLI i9 Y b.CL AS Ywb02 ci E 'O w N h O N AD W we {y to ,� CY „„O cuW.i.. KY M 1 v JJ 0 x W R 1 i;-11 M� V Y „C •� Y O aV,• � � alit � � M .G. C� � oAy� j ■ j� V $ ay�att� yv4r� ypV gig' yy p `i• i�M ^7 Yfiy �SY MOgY■ Mi+� Ca O;. � y�3pppa Y ,BYM,G, o •i� G� Nu Y �O i • g ¢ M Y Y �Yg� ��M ygN=yy�~ 0.QN pryOS ;L4 �YW.�• {y.Y •• w O N CQYA�' OCi S_. $ t6a V .�i 13.Oa1 :* V o"aC`a�ie���'� y N V i G w HE y V I I �yyGy" «M $ 1 �V`iy rfs� 1 -s, y • N k e 9" 2 3 C Q w u> 4.Ni w� ww+• ��. O• L^ �. 6 k M£ y C Yp �Y ^IY Vim' G �w� Y E4 .�. 93a.. w °3sq � � O aV,• � � V � � � M .G. C� OMB pV„ yy p `i• i�M ^7 ai L V r� O S~ Y Ca O;. � y�3pppa Y ,BYM,G, o •i� G� Nu �O i • � rT ¢ M Y ^L 6 0• �Yg� ��M ygN=yy�~ 0.QN Y =9wV sN N�•� ■ i` .2 r ! 0yy.9 2 �@ 13.Oa1 :* V o"aC`a�ie���'� y N V i G � y V 4�• S VV� G Y ^ iY4 a� r NtYi y.N ( C� vt I � •2 .'i +• 1 V� C J 6 i" ! �yyGy" «M $ 1 �V`iy rfs� 1 -s, y • N k e 9" 2 3 C Q w u> 4.Ni w� ww+• ��. O• L^ �. 6 k M£ y C Yp �Y ^IY Vim' G �w� Y E4 .�. 93a.. w °3sq s a �sYY: 'r C� OMB V ^7 ai L V r� O S~ Y Ca O;. � y�3pppa Y ,BYM,G, o •i� G� Nu 4 r3psVa NC Me� �Yg� ygN=yy�~ 0.QN uSs O N�•� ■ i` .2 r ! 0yy.9 2 13.Oa1 :* F M- a- CZAR 0 VCOOV NYC I � MI •� MI �I p��rp V f AV N E E E L C� OMB V ai L V r� O S~ Y 0.t j i 4 N ♦ W � j� M M N ,BYM,G, o •i� G� 4 O -0 �ii •=n iq b �i + Vc e N V V F M U!1 b 13.Oa1 g�w Ni� t N 0 u ri E E E 11=2 99c�` OY7 N • ` r ` N4QY^ h. LIJ Eli Be uyYw. �yYj Yom` M V \+ L � J C\r�L Q.Y Ny u O° �Y py ,^yb?� �V N M .0"' y� \^Cy, « �. � O p. C Lj{f N N p� ■p�pc. �v9{{1 y �• �Ci a C icy \°.Q� 4�_CO22"4 �yy �jyNj{�,M �� �°p Oy {O�. �Y 4�♦ � �i � C�n�C �t Yf A +Y� �..LT , ♦�i g. Nl ■N`� yyY pNM. yN�C'1y fYNl +C yV ��+ 11.i 0 Y. Y. ♦ p4 N VCr "� 4C C� • e �0.4�Y C i. _CC Y ^p �. T M i�. `LY VY NK�� �■ i C ■i ^' Ln p " y Y Yp, Q O N { G�.A a L N. M S. S 3 p1 9 �{{33pr �. i.�i r ^.� NNrY.N Y�Y Y ai 22C� 0 �T MAE. ^Q `offi ©fie $ I o � i tV wi ui V !� a� \w C �S4 d� LV1 �tl6ntl�6ii agqYG O� � '• Cpo�GN� =Y r{+yYN OSIC� V3 6 CWY 2 -z aG Yyy ^ OV`y a\i atli s UITL ` pppp1 t! .G yy •O' S'p V �` 4yy L 6 NN Md L M `CYL�i. 6V Us `� 4 N yyp N�pA Np �. ��• �• "3.� � _L �ie�R)a f 777 i1 C j $_jid9re� �A }Yyg paa33 wyy� G ^ L L f 'R2 Ms V O.� + C Mpg Y • �. ^p0+> we Y � V 4Y LO�C �.. '.. ~�` _ Ju.. V.2 v,`oV >yY Cw y(Aq N Ya••asyy.Y 4 � KC 9 LY w ■ ~ RV �4 H. N.° ��Y�� � 01p y � qyy� � �0�� Kw1© Gi Gam° �r•� WN WVVI aG1 i,•�} KS > lO7V K. �Ol� �� R • 8 Y' I 7 L .r `W {1 a Z w W a b o t Y Y .' y 1` a Y C yy cc L CC M O �_ ■Yp4(yL Y 4I N O ■ N •` � ` ' C y Gp L V �cs� �ro it �, w^ NW �� #p�•� ,n g `CO fi e�'� si� YcnS ttY� �NI'y CW. 0 cy •Y C L ff bll. Y 6O0 ~ SL��'v V M~Lb �{9. Oa LS YS aO.N a yL Vie A•pop ai ty'i'YY a `ib tiK�> �``° �o OY (� JJ•�Lyt V aL L�O� :ceps c @O u {i1N `FV t O rW Yj! N� YV 06 �t wig abw Y�a iys(� 3 Z p�, 4 oy �y O @y M Y C S~ JNO �f �. Y4 y b w�hhV y_ LLM 4[_s, Q{N�CV ' C YyY� l 'Z Y� 1 !1 L Y Yw +6 {�, �w �OSSw NV k&S iY iw! �tlMN`Y1./ Nl � rte' G gv$ 'OHO N U�3 <sa ! I�.4 .S .r t .2 N aw .O J •� X u d Ga LuA b .ria AMY r � °S� ��•J tl� t• aS�M l l 4Y 8 .2 tz y 4 W ' t Sit I ` N.. C b Y C � N 6M � • w LY^ O'']] f3 pyC JGA M '04 O Y. V{�IN;N LA4 aY i L YI Yy� 601 a O v W q QOM v^ � e n wA1 � � ■ya ,j�ei YN CN q C� Y F !YI Qy .+t�J Y ^pg � v+�y�y "°'YN Y00 Om G �? O• c Li: 4 b P R C C !� cc tl wf �ew 6 -. uJ 1 O .O J •� X u d Ga LuA b .ria AMY r � °S� ��•J tl� t• aS�M l l 4Y 8 \' y 4 W ' t Sit I ` N.. dyE C � j z V. 6M � • w Y w"---? %I n d Ga LuA b .ria AMY °S� ��•J tl� if aS�M l l 4Y 8 � y 4 Y S C� dyE Z t" j z V. 6M � • w LY^ O'']] f3 pyC JGA M '04 O Y. V{�IN;N LA4 aY i L YI Yy� 601 a W n /0701-02 � 04-1Z-89 PC Agenda -1..O f 5 Lt A. lu a 4 L Y a � 6� p�M L p�p S R AT ,rc w yc }, G � W u >c Y � L a 0. C� w� MW d 4 � M YT �* 6 f�J * aV 41M. C ttU 4 d 'a i4a M M ryM LV Y 4 s ey c « 01 :�r w 4 � C w � S MP C gM w M^ L w � fe L pro of f qp WC � N Y q C'Oy A I�yyL y � • �M4N9 WM �.aYYq� nL Y #VN W 4 aY -5a 7a �x Y y a *pu q �p Wq N L q ;ye yLY� wL N L 4 w « � Z T 21 ZM_ » b +s $ .. rat t< LP 1 Y g 9 # i 4 4 7 awu L»� M Vai. w' s 42-t 49.4 +c y KA ..d G .r .tLo 0 Ali a "W H G� �g j =ra M W M F,, fi Eft UO A � at u 5.9 A M L %fl A s ssss 4 s- @7 v O. �Z1Z Y p�y�• It $ ° �MY •i p� Y r�it VN � »a u � a ASS Y � �pyy, C LxYa a ^�Vyy A,wy! N w Y Lp Y a as L f. 4 �'x Ant pyA P Y^ G b bf L 0..x'.131 $r`�.u°. M w • at M IL y bon ppT L ; Q N ayUN C !� iy1 9W V N 2V hai KA ..d G .r .tLo 0 Ali a "W H G� �g j =ra +4 r L `pt' L ~'rd 1 Eft UO +��.. at u 5.9 A M L %fl A s ssss 4 s- a25« v ts.�a �Z1Z •S a «� �MY V zaNi r�it VN � »a u � a ASS Y � �pyy, C LxYa a ^�Vyy A,wy! Lp Y a P w Y °e. 4 �'x Ant P Y^ G b 0..x'.131 $r`�.u°. M T 1i9 X l gb U , Log r CA r -��- i ;r a�� 1 WA Q1 4.0 �. ap U of K m +EFAfOSA f �ro O M ' s J y O U v r ' ;r p CY - CJ as i 0 4 QgjD� p I �o 0 - h ri 9i • � '..- n111i1L1AitmWttlt , {� t" ::VY C•l. � !''t` Ci7a°°Ji.`R�l+1 1 g_. AFEt:O'1'ME 4NSA11t�1tVi EIC—,O I — i1ECOh0 D 1N e`;i rii_ ott m OFFICIAL hci:URng REEacurlaa Ea, ob -Ir6 1996 MY 30 PM 3:13 + SAN BE RNARDINO A cE1OVOTI ,or Tilt CITY COUNCIL Ol TEE CITt 'lie AL F• COMM, ALAVOAEIA, BDHIARILT ORDERING TEE VACATION Of A PORTION C." BANYAN ensar. EAST OF ARCNIEALD AVENus AND HRST OF ALTA LO4A CNARNsL WNCU ^.E, by Cbspter 4, Article A. Eectioc 8330, of the streets and E1lghway Coda, the City Council of the Cit7 of 24000O Cucaacoss la autbori[.d to auaaertiy vacate a portion of the City street hereinafter more particularly besctibedi and WHEREAS, the city Council found all tbu evidence sub,ltesd that a Portico of .3axxyae street, east of Archibald Avenue and vest of Alto Lai, :+ Cbannel. to uaasceessry for presser Of prospective public street parposse because it has been suparesded by relocation. NOW. TEIRElOES, 5E IT MOVED by the City Council of the City of Raacbo Cucamonga as Pollors: ERCTIOE L:. That the city Council of the City of rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating that portion of street an Hap V -oaf oa file in the office of the City Clark of the City of Reecho Cucamonga, which ban bass further described in a legal description which is ■ttscbei tamers.• wr`ad Exhibit wA °, and by reference rude a part thereof. RICTICH 2s That Item .& ''fter the date tce ¢esolntion if recorded, said portion of Banyan street, o', sf Archibald Avenue, no longer constitntea a street at public utility esesa2nt. resolution to be i eecordedh city Cifirk cause CountylfRecorder sof this hSon Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVID, and ADOPTED this 7tb day of slay. 1956. ATEE: Mikele. Euaset, Kic$, Debt, Wright NOES: Bass : ABSEEr: Nona fry E t. Nay r ATTES *: Eevee a y Clark Californiai,do hereby yAear certify the f t�soRRingf Resolution was o Cucamongo" approaed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Reecho Cucamonga. Csliforaia, at a regular asatiog of said City Council held on the 7th day of Hey. 1956. V Revolution 110. 86 -.26 176-142;21 N ?*So Y rkscutad ibis of day, -A Nay, 1186 at Raaebo Caeaaonq. Callforais. �a+nrly F�J. AntbalaE. City Clark s]rslllT "A" LIMAL 1179CIIPZION Banyan street vacation -""lef.ns th�01 pactieps of Baayaa straw[ ws identified par 2actruneot so. 81 447413ficiat Records recorded firceb 9. 1181 an& IseCrament We. 80 -02641icial 24a erd0 rscordai January 308 1406 l is ritUm Lots L $1 7 t a 31e t6ilY rrosilass Trutt Company's Tract No. 2. For plat recorded to look 20. lase 34 of N ps in tba office of the County Recorder of On C000ty of sea Raraardiso, state 'Q California. The forerpinn,fn�iNrd,:rt is a COrrcct ceoy of the on[inil on file in this office. BEVERI `. A. R! X11.1.11 i City Clerk. Rancho qicalnonga, Calif. BY: 411 � l i E c f E r r� a3 a» N 4 � 4 r 4 aZ 1 � �u W*. 2� w s i Q a dr E'. T O V 0 (n m CL V Archlbqjd Aftg--.- ne q (t, 0 1 1.. DATE: TO: FgOM: BY: SUBJECT: --- ---- -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT CAALONO Q April 12, 1989 1977 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Brett Hornnr, Assistant Planner MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89 -07 - A.W. DAVIES - A request or expansion of a non-conforming use By adding 710 square feet of office space to an existing buildNq and warehouse totaling 4,560 square feet on 3.82 acreo, of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the southeast corner of 9th Street and Nelms Avenue - APN: 209- 031 -53 and 54. This item was continued by the Commission -an March 22, 1989. Please see the attached staff report prepared for that meeting for information concerning: this item. Respectfu"Y submitted Brad Bulled City Planner 86:88:js Attachments: Staff Report of March 22, 1989 Resolution of Approval with Conditirns ITEM r DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiA,0XGA GAFF REPORT ��yr�aroro Q r� Uli � lid ttarch 22, 1989 19r"77 =� Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Butler, City Planner Brett Horner, Assistant Manner MINOR DEVELOPMEt9 REVIEW 89.07 - A.W. DAVIES - A request for expansion of a`r on- conrorming use y a ng 710 square rest of office space to an existing building and warehouse totaling 4,5 60 square feet on 3.82 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the southeast corner of 9th Street and Nelms Avenue, APN: 209..032 -53 and 54. I, PROJCCY AM SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a site plan and elevations for a square Ot office addit +on to an existing building.: B. Su�,ruunding Land Use and Zoning: North - Industrial buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 3) South - Industrial buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 3) Cast - Single family residence and orange grovel General Industrial (Subarea 3) West - Industrial buildings; General industrial (Subarea 3) C. General plan Des, nations: Project Site - General Industrial North 4 General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial PLANNING COMMTSSION STAFF REPORT MDR 89 -07 - A.W. DAVIES March 22, 1989 to Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The site has been developed as a bUllding con rac ors office and storage yard, including a 4,560 square foot building, a large storage area which contains building equipment, supplies, and construction materials. The site does not currently meet various Development Code and Industrial Area Specific Plan standards with respect to street landscape setbacks parking lot design, screening of storage areas, and certain public street Improvements. The property was improved prior to the City's incorporation and adoption of development standards. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio RequireT!_ Provided Office (with . 2,870 11250 11 addition) Warehouse 2,400 1/1000 2 13 Total 13 13 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Minor Development Review 89 -07 was heard by the M-5575­9 ng Commission on February 8, 1989. At that time, the City Planner recommerded approval of the project subject to certain conditions for on -site and off -site improvements in order to bring the non- conformirg site up to current development standards. The Commission, however, felt that these conditions combined represented too great a burden for the applicant, given the limited scope of the project. Thus, the Commission directed the City Planner and City Attorney to meet with the applicant to establish which conditions and improvements could be revised, Based on the Comission's direction at the February 8,, 1989 meeting and in accordance with Section 17.02.13n of the beveiopment Code, pertaining to expansion of non - conforming uses .end structures, the original conditions were revised as follows: Original Condition Revised Condition Planning Division 1. Provide 13 parking spaces Unchanged to City standards ! = --a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR 89 -97 - A.W. DAVIES March 22, 1985 Page 3 Original Condition Revised Condition 2. Provide screening and landscaping Relocate existing along Helms Ave., Feron Blvd. and chain link fence to 9th Street the required setback along 9th St. and landscape and irrigate the entire 9th St. frontage. Relocate existing chain link fence along Helms Ave. outside the public right -of -way and plant and irrigate vines along the fence at a minimum of 10 feet on center. Engineering Division 1. Submit a lot line adjustment Unchanged 2. Provide an additional 3 feet Unchanged of dedication 3. install �'No Parking" signs Unchanged along all street frontages 4. Provide sidewalk, street trees, See Part B, street lights atzd standard drive "Issues ", below approaches along all street frontages S. A Registered Civil Engineer Unchanged shall prepare all - ,treet improvement plans 6. Post surety guaranteeing Added to revised completion of public improvements Condition 4 7. Waive Engineering Condition 1 Deleted if evidence is submitted showing that a 2 -hour fire wall exists 8. Issues: The wording of Conditions 4 and 5 will remain essent ally unchanged. However, the improv - -Ats required by Condition 4 could be phased and installed subsequent to occupancy of the office addition. If the Commission is 1 -4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR 89 -07 - R.W. DAVIES March 22, 1989 Is Page 4 comfortable with the pt.asing and feels that it is appropriate, tte City Engineer will need to esl;;ablish a time schedule for the phasing. The applicant will have to post surety and execute an agreement guaranteeing completion of the public street improvements. This ;phasing" of the public improvements would be consistent with Chapter 12 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, which �r_e_quu�i�res� Improvements but allows the City Engineer flexibiTity��n determining exactly when they must be completed. lire attached Resolution of Approval has been drafted to allow the phasing subject to approval of the City Engineer (see Engineering Division Condition 4). If the Commission does not feel that phasing is acceptable, this condition must be revised. Finally, the Commission may also want to give direction to the City Engineer as to what it considers appropriate time limits. [Ii. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The request will not be detrimental to the goals and o ec gives of the General Plan. The request will not be detrimental to the public hearth, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Iv. RECOWr:NDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning C-!*zision approve nor Development Review 89 -07 subject to the conaiticns in the attached Resolution of Approval. Re Witted , B Ci BB :BH:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Mao Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Building Elevations Exhibit "D" - Staff Report of February 8, 1989 Resolution of AKI oval with Conditions /Nth, limI L. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A i ITEM. MDR 89 -0 TITLE. _L.29AMTRON MAP 12 W1- N �e -/I � � MEGY.lM inF.7t�� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A i ITEM. MDR 89 -0 TITLE. _L.29AMTRON MAP 12 W1- NINTH STREET Pi ---- -� {i A y � A existing storage yard e � W 2 PROPOSED 710 Std. FT. ADDITION nwr puking spat*$ -iy EXISTING BUILDING - FERON BCV CIIT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PT.RA NNTNr. nTVT.CTAM 1= -7 ITEM: MDR 8E -07 TITLE: SITE PL-- N .'.ill�elt rr..K4 T W 4 T� I`6fI�N 4Jr,1+C' ' t law SA ra --NAM4 CITY OF ITEM-. MDR 89-07 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLZ-. BUILDING ELEVATIONS L:J DATE: TO: FROM, BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RAIV'CHO Cl +C:AMONGA STAFF REPORT February 8, 1989 Chairman and i%mbers of the Planning Cono fission Brad Buller, City Planner Brett Horner, Assistant Planner MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89 -07 - AX DAVIES - A reques aadda b'WIi ,rare ee of office space to an exis:;ng �uil and warehouse totaling 4,560 sgvare feet on 3.82 acre, land in the General Industrial District (Suharea 3) of Industrial Specific Plan, located on the southeast corne 9th Street a Nelms 1venu +9 - APN: 209 - 031 -53 and 54. I. PRGJ:-rT AND SITE DESCRIPTIOR: A. Action. Requested: Approval of site lan and elevations for a buu square o0 o fice add�.aion to an existing building. B. Surrounding Use and Zon aq : North - Industrial buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 3) South - Industrial buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 3) East - Single fancily residence and orange grove; General Industrial (Subarea 3) West - industrial buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 3) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial Solith - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial EXHBIT 'ID" K PLANNING COMMISSION „ AFF REPORT MDR 89 -07 - A.W. OPHES February 8, 1989 Page 2 6. Site Characteristics: The site is occupied by an offirs/ warehouse 50, nng`and storage yard. A 4,560 square foot building exists on -site as does a large storage Brea which contains building equipment, supplies, and constr.;ction materials. The site does not currently meet various Development Code and Industrial Area Specific Plan standards with respect to street landscape setbac' i, parking lot design, screening of storage areas, and certk,'n public street improvements. The property was improved prior to the a "•sty's incorporation and adoption of development standards. E. Parking Calvulations Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spe es Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Office 2,160 1/250 Warehouse 2,400 1/1000 F,oposed Addition 6OU 1/250 2 11 Total 13 11 II. ANALYSIS: General: Minor Development Review 89 -07 has been ref_rred to 9e Fanning Commission for review and action. The project !Pvk.�,3s issu s of Commission policy with regard to upgrading of - confor -wing sites (to current development standards) at ti,a ie of any proposed expansion, B. Peo3ert Chronology. Listed in table format below is a brief We—scr per. o— nn`ofl-te project's history. Date Action June 6, 1988 The applicant applied for a building permit for the office addition and ways informed of the requirearen, for a Minor Development Review (MDR). o!ie 13, 1988 The applicant submitted the MDR application (MDR 88 -25). June 23, 1988 City staff responded with an I mploteness. letter (Exhibit "G"). Sept. 19, 1988 The applicant met with City staff conce -ping screoning /r„Ascaaing and other requirements. F_ to Ll ti: s PLANNING COMMISSXOh AFF REPORT MDR 89 -07 - A.W. DAVIES February G, 1989 Page 3 Date Nov. 16, 1988 Dec, o", 1988 Dec, 13, 1988 Dec. 23, 1988 Jan. 16, 1989 Action The applicant submitted a letter requesting phasing of the requirements for site improvements (Exhibit "F "). The applicant met pith City staff to discuss ..:e phasing proposal, Staff exp.ained phasing of improvements is a policy issue and woald remain as a coalition of approval, The applicant indica0d his desire to appeal the conditions to the Planning Commission. The City Planner approved MDR 88-25 subject to 3 conditions for site improve►terts (Exhibit "0 "). The appeal period ended and no appeal was filed. The applicant met with City staff to request reconsideration of the original application submitted June 13, 1988 and if necessary that this matter be taken to the Planning Commission. Jan. 25, 1989 The applicant ;-e-applied for an MDR w'aich does not address the conditions placed on the previous approval. Feb. 1, 1989 At the re quest of staff, the applicant submitted a letter presenting the reason they have submitted the modification (Exhibit "E "). C. Issues, In accordance with previous policy direction and ev"eTMpont review actions, the City Planner approved MDR 88- 25 sub;lect to conditions which would have brought the subject site into substantial conformance current developmnt standards. These zogditionx included requirements for public improvements, such as the installation of public sidew� css, street trees, street lights, driveway approaches, and "no parking" signs, and on -site improvements, sgch as stmetscape landscapi:ig (25 feet landscaped area as measured from curb face), screening of storage areas, and i4dditiona,l parking lot construction to s.:tisfy parking demand generated by the proposed office expansion. Additional street right -of -way dedication (3 feet) and a lot line adjustment wero also made conditions 6 approval. It should be noted that these PLANNING COMMISSION AFF REPORT MDR 89 -07 - A.W. DAVIES February 8, 1989 Page 4 conditio,s are standard conditions placed �n all proposed expansion projects on non - conforming sites. In no way do they represent "special" or "new" conditions which have not been required of similar property owners in the past. During the previous Minor Development Review process the applicant agreed to and submitted a proposal that substantially complied with the conditions of approval for MDR 88 -25. The matter of phasing the improvements was the only remaining issue where agreement was not reached, the Planning a;td Engineering Divisions could not support the applicant's proposed phasing plan. The City's Municipal Code requires that all public 1mpros'er-_nts (those within or ad acen the public right -of- ;as;, s -I," as sidewalks, street lights, street trees, etc.) be constructed with the issuance of a building permit (and not phased). Phastng of on -site improvements is not restricted by ordinance but was deemed unacceptable due to current policy and the legal details and potential enforcement problems associated with this action. Before City Planner took action on the initial Minor Development Review he invited the applicant in to discuss staff's position on the phasing. The applicant indicated that he intended to appeal the City Planner's decision on the phasing to the r1anning Commission. However, an appal was not filed within the 10-day period established by the Development Code. 1"tead, the applicant has resubmittet. a revised Minor Development Review application, With this application (MDR 89 -07), the applicant does not propose to comply with the 8 conditions placed on the original (MDR 88- 25) approval. Given this situation, the City planner determined that the project should be reforred to the Planning Ccamission and either be approved subject to the original 8 conditions or be denied as proposed. Conditions may also be deleted or modified at the direction of the Commission except those required by Ordinance. Those would include the off -site i mpravements. III. FACTS F(YR FINDINGS: The facts for findings will deperA on which slo7'u't7 n s a op Rd. See each attached Resolution (paragraph 3) for specific findinlv. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Hinor Develormnt Reviews 89 -07 subject to conditions or deny the application (as proposed by the applicant) by adopting the appropriate Resolution. ti-- PLANNING COMMISSION AFF REPORT a MDR. 84 -07 - A.W. DAVIES Febru,�ry 8, 1989 Page 5 4ftsp y s d, r G EB:BN :ko Attachments:. Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Building Elevations Exhibit "D" • MDR 80-,26 Approeal Letter Exhibit "E" - Letters Explaining Re- application Exhibit "F" • Letter Requesting PhL�aing of Improvements Exhibit "G" - Incompleteness Letter Resolution of Approval with Conditions Resolution of Denial t W J c7.�,Earv.. 5 rn-r Is 77 z �ho�5-ra:_ s 11=)01. ll 11 ul CITY OF ITEM EM ly DR 9-0 ram RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE. L®MATION MAP ,.. P— 114 �J P' I ` f OF RANCHO CA -iaI Poor Quality PROPOSED 600 Std. FT. ADDITION :XISTING $ULDiNG i ITEM: M_QN7 TI TLZ: -Si_ TE.MAN ..MN Mr {yAV T /a1 rs �7+° N46TAY9 - ��rrassc .R TJ1.tittsrf.'lwlTwt wlr�— . ,�;wsrf•swc. rrYt4 _+„ dQAAS. .aw aLrs r �v IY K*ev I{j i roNAfofEfr E4 5r EZ.EYAT ZA4 1 El i I'i'i' OF ITEM: ME a9 - ®7 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'TITLE: .bU Af INs Original Poor Quality M1_ Un OF RA%:HOCI:CAMC%'GA December 13, 1488 "r, Jorge Gard Garcia and Associates 107U Arrow Route, $ uit* 604 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 41730 SUBJECT: MINOR OEYELWERT REYI6it 88 -25 Dear Mr, Garcia; We Are in receipt of your letter requesting ptasing of the on -site improvements required as part of Minor Development Review 88 -25. The Municipal Code requires that all public improvsmanvT be constructed with the issuance. 0 a building permit. There(ore, pub`1e improvements. can not be phased, Further, staff cannot support the oroposed phasing of the required on -site imprevemmts es LACY • 74' -, -.: screening of the construction yard. This position is consistent wit past actions of the does includeeatproviion for phasing aelb await nr of Ohai,rtg oP and site iscproveaonts is t policy decision and is not a Finance specific as is with the public improvetants. I thank you for taking the time last week to meet with the staff and discuss your prbject: As rat discgssad at that meeting you are in agreement with the screaming raquirW4ft. and only question the requirement of screening it now or later. Again the question of phasing is a policy decision. Therefore. I had bd chatcat. One was to deny Minor Development Review 88 -25 on the basis that screening is rtqutred and that you did not wish to comply with the r*CWMndad condit1w. The second vas to approve your project with the appropriate conditions as This decision %hallolbe your project dAY PP4AI Period beginning with the date of this letter. rtrtqq the note that f gebut 41ags it evidence is presented which conclusively shows that a lot line and 2 solid, 2 hour, fire walls with do opadings exists betreen the One parcels and txildings, the introveeents rill only be nWjrad to the northerly parcel. Findings A. That the proposed project with conditions is caeststtnt with the G"Qral. Plan. B, that the proposed project with conditionr, is in actordante with the obiectivas of the In',Wstr,si Area Spettfle Plan and the purposR of the district in Wch the site 1s located. C. That the proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health. safety, or weiFAre Or materially injurious to 0roroperties or improvements in the vicinity.. D. That the proposed project will comply with each :, the applicable provisions of the Development Code. CITY OF RANCHO C Caf' i!'i4 NGA _ —PL A i- N1NG Dl dl Ta9Tn 111 r—) l Ti EU(-i 8° 9 *07 TITTLE: A P Py J OVAL LETTEI vvt!'rom. n --t Original Poor Quality Canditt -5 This project is approved subject to the following conditions: flanniM Ofvtsfon I. The applicant shall provide 3 additional parking stalls to be raved, striped, and lgcatad wfthfn t parking tot which eaets all applicable City Standards, 2. The construction yerds shall be screened from public view along Helves Avenue, Farcn Qoulevard, and Sth Street through the use of *bits, fences, and /or berms. The proposed screening shall be rev "ad and approved by the City Planner and shall meet all City Standards with regard to do fgn, lgcation, and construction waartals. Screening shall bu Installed prior to occupancy release of the addition. Engineering Diylsign 1. The applicant shall submit a lot line adjustment to eliminate U10 tot, line that Crosses the building prier to issuance of bufidfff�t permits. 2. The appltc:It shall provide an additional 3 feet of dedication for state: rfght -Ofway along Nees Avenue. 3. The aipl't :ant shall install No Parking MytiN" signs on all street feantagas to the satisfACifon of the City Englnaar. a. The AIPlicint shall eonttruct the following street iwprovkW,ts on Feron Boulevard. Nalma Avenue, and gth Street. a) Sidtsllks Adjacent to ultimate right -of -way. b) Streat ties. C) Reconstruct drive approaches to City Standard No. 306. d) Street lights. S. Strait iwprowment plans. including parkway treat, street lights, and drive approaches prepared by a Registered Civil fors all public %treats by the City issu nee Of encroachhient permit. 6. Surety shalt be hosted and an agreement executed to the satisfacttcn of the City Entinier and City Attorney. Qaarantating ^ampletion of the wblft, street 04rova%onts prier to issuance of building pir'.es. Please note that eandittons My SWify tospietion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits. If evidence is presented which conclusively shows that a lot line and a solid, 2 -hour fire wall with no openings exist: between the two parcels and buildits, the iwprovaaranta will only ba required on the northerly panel (APML M011 -83) And f:ngirmring Division's Condition 1 can be .110 noted. if you should hart any araestfon- -- -,arnfrg specific conditions, Please fell free to contact Bret% Horner at (714) 989 -1661. Sincerely, cap" a Off DEPARTMW 145� Cilanner 88:mig CITY OF RANCHO a A PLANNING 0 E ITEM: MDRJ9.07 TITLE: MM IL-2.5 APPRO A"ETTER 1 vairuirto" f9_® 2 Original Poor Quality -a& a - 01- WcD 13 2'63 arouagy 30, i449 Brad bullar, city 'tannar City at Rancho cucamonga 4310 Baseline ROad Post 0ffice box 407 Rancho Cucasonga CA 41730 Ref Minor Davelolgent review 44 -35 (Ra -Filsd JahNary 34, 1SSS) Coar Mr. buVers Our client, the Aloart 2. 6avlee Company, Sae refubaltt*6 its applicesioq is% fora substantially identical to that arigiaally subaitted. You are aware the, a prior submissio:1 was the subject of discussion between ust that our ciieut diet tat feel that it could accept the conditions laid down by staffs and that "a aD ^cal period was permitted to run to permit Additional discussions which did pot product agreexant. We therefore request that the issue or the, sanctions to be teyuirad by the City be submitted directly to the planning com- alesion. You are *wars that it is our clients position that an sxparditUre In excess of Sa$c,000.000 is totally out a! lint for this minor addition to the office capacity at the premises. Re will appreciate anything you can do to expedite presanta- tion to the planning commission, $o that both cur eliant and city staff will have the opportuhity to present their rasp active posi. tions an this issue. Thank you for your attention to this matter. varIF truly yours, C30/ad ehar4aa , oo cc¢ client Jorge Careia 1l{ U nd 411 CITYOW ITEM: MOR 89 -07 J04 A RANCHO 1.J CAMO 1 T% LE: REAEPL.iCATION LETTER Original Poor Quality aanuary 7, 1989 Cn. .P n61rs' .'jf tuG�QNa► u aH. •r -Mepp City of Rancho Cucamonga Post office Box 807 7 AN :8,4i�ti))ltlt^�3t4)3:s Rancho Cucamonga, California 91770 Attentiont Brad Buller, City Planner no: Minor Development Review o0 -25 Albert H. Davies, Inc. ,Antlemen: Albert W. Davies, Inc,. the applicant tar the above- raferenced Minor Development Review and his representative Mr. Sorga Carcia have consulted to this Office because of their ongo. =g reluctance to concur with the conditions sought to be imposad by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for approval of that application. They have asked me to addrssr some comments to the City with respect to the application. V* have reviewed the application.- and the, Conditions requested by the City. It is apparent to us that the City is at- tanptinq to exact conditions and force expenditures which bear no relationship to the very small need orcated by this application. The request being made by the applicant is to add 600 square "teat To 4,360 square feat of office space in an GXiWt nq struc- ture. 600 square fast represents office accommodations for three additional e3ploy666 The building -s, approximate value is $340,000.00t only 510,000,00 will be expanded upon this improve- ment. The City has imposed as conditions the provision of 11 addi- tional parking spaces, $crooning on 4 sides of the propertyi a lot line adjustaent to remove an existing lot lint sidawalkst grading of drivewayst lights: the dedication of additional right of way: and parking signs. The estimated cost of the improvement :! 5304, ono.00. The supreme Court of the United States, in Pollan yy Falifornia Coastal omm psion, 107 S.Ct. 7141 (1997) held that a property dedication requirement ^aunt possess an essential nexus to the impact of the proposed development." Conditions suit be imposed for the purpose of mitigating any adverse affeel. which a proposed project will have. It is evident that the conditions sought to be imposed -ty the City bear no relationship whatsoever (much lose oven a ra- tional ralatienthip) tip the need, created by this development. The City is attempting to exact, as a condition of a routine building permit for , minor addition to a substantial structure, conditions at sigr7,ficant expenditure. It is exactl)t that conduct which the Hollan case hold to be a taking. It should not be necessary for eitlscas at the community or applicants for building permits to have to fight their way tnrough bureeuctatL7 attempts to obtain far more than a proper exaction. our CS'unt has Loan Obligated. despite his protesta- tion, to CantinVally atatm and restate this position. He has in- dicated a villin1moss to c^.mproaiss, and a willingness to attempt to workout icny tars plan for scas of the improvements the+ City wants. But he is unwilling, in exchange for this minor permit, to be subjected to demands havin- -10 s:alationship to the need which it ersatss or to unreasonable requiremonts of the City. The M21- W Cass iapcsas upon the courts the obligation to make an *valuation Of the, relationship between the need created by an ap- plication and +t,a conditions sought by the Community. It should not be necessary to invoke a court -s scrutiny. But my client will do so before he agroea to most outrageous and unjustifiable, requires anto. We would appreciate hearing Iron you in a sp)Xit of Coopera- tion, which Cou14 result in rasolvinq this matter without the necessity of further confrontation. Your attention to the considerations $at forth in this let- ter is invited. Very truly yours, CI-11"Ir OF { Charles S. Doskov 8 rlte MW 89-07 ,RANCHO UCAM TITLZp R Q ATL WTnR Original Poor Quality Marcia & Associates f o ".- Anew Roue wtrnoa Aarot�p (', ufr -.;nit :t if'33 •i1. ;6!.'"t'1 C I. TV Of RANCHO CUCAA0t4;A PLkV41VC 'sEPARTSIEUT 97+6.8 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 41°.0 Attentron: 'At. . Britt Horner Ats,stant Planner Subject: A.W. Davies Engineering Office Addition U' -JOR DEVEtONa1ENT REVIEW 08 -25 Dear Britt: This is a saoplert ant to out telephone conversation regarding the imoI Arnim tat, on of the "OR Eel -IS Requirements. Our *':ant is proposing the following progra.ri to imolan.,At the subject matter. SCOPE Or nORKS: It is oroposed to add APproximatety .`q o,ft. of area to an exist ng huI id In$ with fn an alrtedu develop*. prolect. The proposed axpantion is within the al tow0te uses set forts bV the industrial specific plan. UOR REQUIREMENTS: Planning Division: 1. Parking Roquirememts: Eleven (tt) parking spaces will be provided as, required by city ordinance. 2. sm.Cts Yard Screening.: The City ordinance. requires that we screen 1 tms Aveytt*, -Saxon flfvd. Arid along the northern and ea at ern prop *r tV tines with the required landscaping. Ih order to execute this program, the 0"of requested that this specific condition be tmp(amented within a thy** (3) year time frame. In order to insure that the work Is accomplished within the time I tarot, the a+wrer will provide A Surety apnd for eatimatton of the cost of construe tIon. Forthernoto, the owner will provide Attest rights to the city to accnmplfsh such r work. Toe requested time (lama Is needed due to the fact that a n,ajar tenant. It presently occupying the southern potitot of this proporty with the understanding that their lease apream*nt will be due within three (71 years. ptosantly, the owner Cart not g*rlorn any +ask within the boundries of the protect. Sptcificty It the Acreening would requite a otnomety set back. of 2S feat as iOft 0,1 r*locatton al tht driveways. The owner has expressed hit desire to cooperate. And in in order to show his good faith, he has suggested that a portion of the ark could be Implemented along 91h Street wnlch . is one of ehv nett visible stctvnns of the proioet. As you are aware, this rfeefrianenl is ext"'Wly costly with respect to the minor building that is proposed.. CITY OF ITEM: ` ij ECHO M0NG T1TL1e r MW RL § TER too Vase It ?r ermiesavrs 1 Original Pear Quality Ent s"ettl"e Otrision: Eaittint 11YCN'aad Utility Roquittfnan[t: That* rA na eaittlag overhead ,I hilt ill within the orcootty boaadrt0sa istuts T. Let twine adustment -. Ttt own*( is willing to at •t 100 talsttas tots Into coo oaccet. ,. st'aac tmpravments A) Sidowiwss: The NCR requires sidswa)k imorovtmen n, 'TO Fnutd like to brlot to your att set, *I that there it n,. 0.1111"" $14twelk r, s o 01thar side of Helms Ayvnue or Far a fllyd. The on IV esisting sidewalk within the prosi.nity of the pfopttty is $tong the north side of 4th $treat. Wt would tikt to toques+.' that sidewalkf he V44pivtd afoot she south tide of 0th $Cleat only (notch propetty lint of aubiatt protect', bl Street Tteesr tandacapint will be provided according to city six ""A,cit. c) Evistfn" arivewaYS: The drirexmy In Feron Diva. it new. All d'IvawavS in Heima AVenua will be uptraded to city standards. di Street Unfits! Street Sights will bt provided accordint to ,:fly saqui FlnVntt. T. Street oedicettuo: Thr *4 (]) additional 'tat will be. dedicated *Ion{ Heim% AVenut as ultimate tteegt tlght -of -way. a. Parking Sign: *%a Parking Any Time' slgn installed on all street frooteses. . Sint* the %pacriitd v'Ogftra is Very espansfve and comv:cl, tie owoof wd,ld t.ta to implement this p,Ojq%t in tro ph&%**: phase t'. ContirucRlon of the 600 square feet to take 71tca immediately, due to the owner• s netdt as well at is arotd the rainy Season. Otherwise, construction would flare to be delayed lot many mooths Or up to a Vest. Phase ti. Wet / Screen ingf StrtetSCapin *: $icing imole»erttaRiort at thrs pragrm wit rtgtfre engiattfing dtawings to be riwrcwed by many City asencitS Antt Safety sand approvals r,ltt take quite A hit of ties!. at You art aware, w* ate 410ous to Consnenee this pietism And wt r'0utit you, 40ititt4aat ytstrding that* matters. Should YOU hard 20Y qutitiona, 01e4t4* feel tree to cohtg" us at Your eat) ce1f COAV40 eocef RApactful IV. 4 ASS S AR aiTECTS rr ;CARCIIA fl. C Art I"elval prasidtat CC= File )RC10f IT OF LNCHO CUCAMON'qA6. !. i'kl+el vw .-PJft sr"-Sml. iRYFr!'!"R 8.7"? El 11 11 lei 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA June 23, 1988 Original Poor Quality bO Y W ad, C--s 4M�, 1 {71L 111.1 p1.111! h'. �s a 6.re1a ssrcta i Ansxtetes 10722 Arrar Ib{aU, Suite 604 poncho Cuea11onga, CA 41730 SUBJECT: 'lIMM DEMOlMEHT RUIN 8845 Dear Mr 6aroia: on June 22ae1M s Listed below are thheef�eaaaintsigWchi"add totbbee addrsst prior to approval, plannino Oivisiom 1. The existing building square footage requires 11 pausing spates. Therefore, three additional Malls are naedad, 2. The existing service yard should be scrm2d along Ibles *vxce, Peron 8agievard, and elZ�e�g ite northern and eastern propel ba:ndsry. Street trffs should be pro•idsd in these & Ms. Enginearinq ofvisfon: 1. Show existing uti I Its On W11 Site flan. Alta, refer to the provide a upante drar7 Dtilt;y Ihriramul Atndoat and ng per Sectlol� 8 oft the handout. 2. Show All existing drive approaeh113. Issues ues 1. Lot lines cannot crews buildings. A lot line adjustsmt to thasentire �sit11 'a to be c016orPd a on11 �)r�fW. Thar afore, comments ferthis project. the 2. The et"lger shall construct the follouing strap+, fsprovamants: a) Sidewalk ad;eeit to ulttmtr right.of -rey. bt Street um. c) Aeeoastruet drfvs apprcuft" to City St"dard Ib. :W d) Staesre lights. 3. An additfewl 2 fat of dedicatfom for street right -c?'A f it -Wired an ibima Avaaw. 4. -Us p'-l" *"fas- son® tiAll t* installed an street frontages. Please sake the recommended chanps and sabmit the fired dots far playr -RIRJ aniaEgargfnaerfng Division review and approval, K�ld(Ehgirnr9og) quest 18[3piaosa ccfttwt 1111 At $1341 or farbara siaeerely. CMWMTY OCYC"18 Y DEFARTIANT RAMFIX 01MION s crett Herner Assistcnt pUrse11r P.m Eaclenorer cc., A. V. Davin CNY OF _ RANCHO LAXAMON TITLE :INCOMPLET E. LETTER EXHT,BIT ,--. G RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 89 -07, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 9TH STREET AND HELMS AVLNUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, AND PAKING KNOINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR. 209- 031 -53 AND 54 A. Recitals. (i) A. W. Davies has riled an application for the approval of Minor Development Review No. 89-07 as described ir the title of this Resolut ;on. Hereinafter in this P.esolLtion, the subject Development Review request is referred tows "the application ". (ii) On the 12th of April, 1289, the Planning Connis.'on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hear 1.9 on the 'pplication and concluded said hearing on that cute. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. Ak NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by t{ e Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 12, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, this Coninission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 8737 helms Avenue with a street frontage of ±870 feet and lot depth of ±191 feet and is presently improved with a building contractor's office and storage yard and partial street improvements; and (b) Ti)e property to the north of the subject site is industrial bui:.iings, the property to the south of that site consists of industrial tuildings, the property to the east is a single family residence and orange grove, and the property to the west is an industrial property. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RUOLUTIQN N0. MDR 89 -07 - A.W. Davies April 12, 19$9 Page 2 (a) That thy: proposed project will not be detrimental to the goals and objectives of the General Plsn; aid (b) That the proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and (c) That the project is in compliance with Section 17.02.130 of the Development Cede, pertaining to non - conforming uses and structures. 4. Based upon the findings and con +.fusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission heraby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and ine6rporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) The applicant shall provide s total of thirteen (13) parrcing stalls to be paved, double striped, and located within a parking lot which meets all applicable City Standards. 2) The storage yard shall be screened from public viers along 9th S6ae* through the use of walls, fences, and /or berms. The proposed screening shall be reviet.ed and approved by the City planner and shall be installed prior to occupancy release of the office addition. The existing chain link fence along Helms Avenue shall be relocated behind the street right -of -way and shall be irrigated and planted with viper it a minimum of 10 feet on center. Engineering Division 1) Tha applicant shall submit a lot line adjustment to eliminate the lot line that crosses the building prior to issuance of building permits, 2) The applicant shall provide an additional 3 feet of dedication for street right -of -way' alone: Nelms Avenue. 3) The applicant shall install "No parking Anytime" signs on all street frontages to the satisfaction of the City Engine 4) The applicant shall construct the following street improvements ',or Feron Boulevard, Nelms ,Avenue, and 4th Street. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MDR 89 -07 - A.W. Davies April 12, 1989 Affik Page 3 a) Sidewalks adjacent to ultimate right -of -way, b) Street trees. c) Reconstruct drive approaches to City Standard No. 306. The City Engineer shall establish an exterrled time schedule for the construction of these improvements. Prior to issuance of building permits, security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City 'Engineer and City Attornev, guarao.2eeing completion of the public street improvements. 5) Street improvement plans, including parkway trees, sidewalks, street lights, and drive approaches prepared by.a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer shall be required for all p�,blic streets prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION GF THE CITY OF RANCHO CLECAMONGA BY: Larry T. FIENiel, Chairman ATTEST: BraH Bull-er;-Ye-c—reTary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hele on the 12th day of April, 1939, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COi+MISSIC'NERS: NOES: COMMISSIGNERS: r ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: tom, x ii 0. y ii ■ ■99 X' •Y�,�yi � +x�M Zip j'• YV w w >tiuY.3My w oo gs.,; au �r S.12 30�11'jv—q rrL � �QN J p N Y 9. M 2 v;' Y `w M yRy'•O C p N v n Z4,s us Y s R O g�vY >3'014��� F 9 mi g N K � wCrwiA �e .Q�C� YY`■ ��L�� Zgk so ok VY dr �yio a x h A a q d ua YY�iyy.0 >L ,get V N o ey • �4fl u sit g4Y CIS Ss :CC &Zs s �� �'W wr py A m yy E 1Jp iCY ®g Yew �'w �L �MYp 4. Ji OV.•�``p y M 6 ��� C �w \S= v j O \� W p i' 4 f f7 ¢ {y N \A ,\pj �■ � i � �0 �Y1 w a•4 �q V Q. El Original Poor Quality 0 �tyato��'aY" t -z.3 oit% is yytb �qy N7 LM N V OAN dNG q O" w N a� F WISE OuYy ) Y�^ Tv E V✓N 4VDS Oe yNw L +' ^pw. �. �ll��i �g ^� �•� � O�'�Lw�j � N « Y�w� 6 VN;:� MUM V�w� LO 1L �� ■Nye. {l�� �'6 B +� 7M y. rip ^p 9`�yy�'G. >pey TTp4 �►�y� Y r Zy SY w` W. aa. ,✓ �N«Y mt��• ^F« 6NCe 4A Yp d Olc §� YO Y iy. lad 3y yew V L^p/ V ^gyp Ce d 9 0C uV^ ' p Y`^ V MC r N.� p�Y iy k r Ali K i` L ^ 9 O q ■ COgCq� SN. .eGOi BYO y��/C� y LV ■N^ E «P l �e✓ 1S� S �¢G4.i s �rie.a ilei°Cq� a «oc $a °� ��Vgp�M ° «y. ya �o "2 C s.)� g3Q'�: wyN 'sits I ca ��� ^Qaii y± {e�«NiVp �IeCN a �rpa� «% �n". 5.4 - ��IZ SaiZ. C n�4 Z' . fC�. agg r�«? )y ^ =.;,� app -Ys se _ s Ra L.CM Q�• L M7 ®6V i6w ®s— i►C 'dam =Sl =°' vt X4^ &83tSS :y 3Li'Ss ...yyeas ty�_'._ sss« � u nyq � t■�L �Mt tl NM �LTi za Cc1 M �v t MT v "OV�a = 1 N ✓�� .*maw 1. a X38: SI a 3 ffial g . 0 M o� €Y .3li rig Z3 =�� _ .5 g`s✓ `r 9! g y J O iit y pia G �Z��`; r sib iraffi 42—A oo 181 ; Si TL =um- _mvs L'� By �`P$p!` -" MNMY ✓ N �x' C6 i's A :O 3 1-41 t � N^ �aN � V OO� YO y tl^ ®N tag ='` v'.✓ �.M8p`S s Ny�ON. _ ape. •y 9ap! 1qi ae�y r o` �'r•8 8 q *¢iMp $ /l. �s✓5«f. VOy 6.0 Oy 'C ✓ ^3 a Yom. •U � `4��t✓. �C V i `III it ita "a Div V+' «�' N G y �."i it 4,i " a 0 CV 1�. m¢s�-;y Jt N ! I� l.w . C6. b A oil as ^ ^ H N Original Poor Quality w d L yy C! u Y C C^ o L y �e- fitr�y y�� ppoYO I 6 @aN +uf pQ y +C¢ +� Z -•�. N yNC iV ^{LiOC o•y.. 9 °�a.Y L�N� M iO LM 'y VTLN r4.l L.0 ^1Ni�OV �CCO. gi Cf YY 1. C �- I Y - L • v T .Y - may. ^N �O Y'N YNyy p- 1�NN�0 @.Vy� �� j Ic •'4 ��G� O= @$ n N w eNb'c- g $YY$y 3 L Nt OI • d O� 3 ' CC e N. _1CC e °� f ^"3••N �tj 8 =m Ol OOY. LS$ C. LQL .. `t, pg,_GLLOOILT ya O o aY Y - *� r$ec `,�. c.� I t^YMf L� MN NL "• CY �° �L1� a °•SYOO yYN �«` •� L y GYI Iy. �'yp1 �`S y��ippp6 C ±q�w -. rz^�� •L20 q y yCLyLC �Y $' 6ra `min a.L~Y1 �,O r� Czb �eeM ,YI i�NM Yi ^Me~ � �� V er. O• ny.�Lr a L' w »NNYS.@9•Y {¢I pZy!� Z c L O Y 7 M O• t N V r i•� IS 6 C$+ 6» s M> .3,; R s ere %:5 ` M C p s Z. Q� ■ p Y� M g_a� YL`&I-�C l$$• � esy V pppp _ Y ,,,yyy 7y� �� � y L � Y ��y •- iii K OY O 8N • -4 sY i es: ar$- is Tit LD 731 1; yi a 1+pw s ^ 6I ._ywaY 04 O N N Y S cri r 14 _ _Y • ^y w • ga �, ■■�1s2s: = �o s�TL t.�it s it Y3a y 6 b 1� C N Ii! @ U1 • • 1 � i O 0 W 4-H ' A 419 v ll "$v Sal" L Y CN$ M U, b raa ",o °yam s'�Ni o � ^g� _off 6�Y5si .3 �YYw Y NY° �• 6QpQI33Y m- :1 g�Hs w`YP Min Y ^p�� Nit. SAS: RoS 3 r:DlTL�I��i �T Yf �O ICI Adak its ij all tt _M V `Y^ p . M a i `,C� ^Y w w Y V yr^Y• �. wY �.i nNa w 4 Original Poor Quality Y V S �-]L U.Yy. � ^g�py { ■y�QCaYfGa� y K Y C G .Cw. Q.yg1 � C SL O i^ w x oYYy y cp Siw LN�-R w�1 y y Y 5 y<��s8 Y 4y �yy7 CY �..MPY 9 �� Y N s s =s p ip lab 8 '12 g Ili �� � w lE w w ' �6 a ;sw. ss Y - .r e YO� •�4- M w � »t� 4 NLO V� ii yY Y^ §i® 6 F +�i� t01. puw.b. ry wY Ya Z .2 Sig �Y VC: NV'w � 158 b s -e o t o �,� ��YY� rp ■Y N3i�. V =� rY.L �� x� ^Ip,YStlls�`o Y$�o■J g �b�gyp�ji s Wp b Oil !OV `V L NI 14 C rI 4 �� a Original Poor Quality, zurzi 33 4 s i M -all F s Oro 44 a r�s~ �Y�y� »� � � a(tlpNqF1 tpr« ♦ M � GI �i � � � c�6�N Cf �w ESic 6 s�y�_� 3�asA°� as to �.Yp Has! M S 3 ft 9 4ill YY �.e& .S2 .�� -5 2 jag a q a ssYY py M 30NM w�V wu S6 tra K a ti u KS�'i� Fw i A V E r Original Poor Quality fit OL ++�� � ��p OYwNO t Zryqf C q .. S�Vd ti� N6+ ~M CL 'jCgYV= ` M r L _ sf �C V «M a 5. ya+,�® 'S �� H}`U •" n 1+ "� ".-.� s M �pj Y GOO Y •tl V_i,L Y y ~ems �w a (yyl CC + C froy ~ 9YY pp � ■_ y= ay +yu. S!p °a aLA ai O a L 4. a F. oaf � �s: �� , ��= °ii is �o ++�. * s M 5�VdW .0 . MNN V9 LM a ,li ! aC = L Si, � p sss W i1ts'1 Y4 _ a L50+L tr OYIxO wk 0, .Yw` �G 'N+�` ``+�.+ bs� G aloSS� �$ t�••8 su a.• �3Y:�8'L'u iii 3� .tr°. g 0 1 Y� a 0 a:N L Y r� � V yO L Q i 3 I .!5 z� "a rE 3 Y L �o M M e3 � t« Y c UT ti i N L r 4 N b W m� ai e m Y Y Y e � M Y �Y .2. 3 MI its 3� Y o Y`M Y Y N N t J 1 O• V w Y 05 M V • °� t Ya i Sir • N r .. 'nn Y Y � w !Y Y IS 11.. 2 °ae$ hi Si =of p Pam= Y �`b N 1s y 12 ell • I i L. I LW O• V w Y 05 M V • °� t Ya i Sir • N r .. v6 Y Y � w !Y Y IS 11.. 2 °ae$ hi Si =of p Pam= Y �`b N 1s y 12 ell • I i L. I LW .``.r y ask L T�� N IaW B rm p �o i r Ix E- C L Y M O d V� L all N J ya0 CV� L u "Z L L 9 Z q� g:• pV y 6 QQn! V 1� I I � r L g u P s ^ yy L V 6 m 1 L a d v � N •6 d Y d w� M � v yj yi N MM`� j,;' 3 N� da Al q,` Original Poor Quality brz • S 11 tuT•. 8 I �p� M t cc N • � s ` MS i• • R a« Q RIL s 11 A N O- al 9 �s Y •� ; S M• sI +� LJ� ��3 ass t :. . k= qrs _.i Y T P' 6JGi•f 44444 Ii. v _�u ��' � N � � mss• 4a `Y i g .15 Y V .g r--33 Q �1V ja O 2- CNC +4 11 tuT•. * du' O Z cc N = j i• R a« Q RIL s 11 A N O- al 9 �s Y •� ; S M• sI +� LJ� ��3 NVV t ® a t . _.i Y T P' 6JGi•f 44444 Ii. 1^U ^I ♦� 41I 11 E, 1E A . ..- vit s vL• ar,�ulv�.ty V vvruvivlvvn t.L:AMr STAFF .REPORT DATE: April 12, 1989 1977�� TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission. FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Tanner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONP% USE 'PERMIT 89 -03 i -eques o ,tablish an arcade within a restaurant ocated at the soiAtheast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue - APN: 208 - 261 -25 and 26. I. BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the March 22, 1989 PTan`Ri`n omM ssion meeting in order for the applicant to conduct a neighborhood meeting. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a non- e,�srruction Conditional Use Pent."It for an arcade within a restaurant. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Mot:l, Mobilhome Park, Single Family Horses; Mixed - Use District. South - Single Family Homes; Low Density Residential (2 -4 belling units per acre). East - Commercial Center, Public Storage, Community Commercial District. Kest Apartments; Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Community Commercial North - Community Commercial South - Low - Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) gxEr1 PLANNI M COMMIVSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89 -03 - SH(WBIZ [PIZZA TIME April 12, 1989 Page 2 A East - Community Cor:aercial West - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) D. Parking Calculations: Umber of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Retail 77,29r 1/250 309 312 Restaurant Chuck E. Cheese 6,000 1/100 60 60 4,000 1/55 73 73 W W The 10,000 square foot Chuck E. Cheese- retaurant will require 133 parking spaces, with the remaining 77,25: square feet of retail space requiring 309 parking spaces. A total of 442 parking spaces are required with 445 spaces being provided. This leaves 3 extra spaces which may not be sufficient for uses that require more than 1 space per 250 square feet. In the future, restaurant, medical offices, health club or any use that requires a parking ratio greater than 1 space per 250 square feet wou "d not be permitted due to the large amount of square footage being utTT -Tzed -6y— Chuck eese restaurant. E. Applicable Regulations: The installation of 4 or more amusement devices tvided, pinball games) within a business is defined as an arcade and require; an Conditional Use Permit per Development Code Section 17.10.030. III. ANALYSIS: A. General: The appilcont proposes to operate the arcade as part Of Chuck E. Cheese restaurant facility. The game areas will be dispersed throughout the 10,000 square foot restaurant (See Exhibit "C "). The applicant proposes a variety of video and arcade gages, skee ball and kiddie rides. There will be between 40 to 50 games (See Exhibit "A"). The primary issues related to the esf-blishment of an arcade are availability of supervision, safety and compatibility with surrounding uses. C--'- :Z� E, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CV!1 89 -03 - SHOWBIZ PIZZA TIME April 12, 1989 Page 3 The "arcade /skill" games are iritented for the entertainment of dining customers, The games are located in the northwest portior of the building and are fully visible by adult patrons. Further, ',,here will be a manager or technician on duty at all times during business hours (See Exhibit "A" ), The foothill Fire District has revi_wed the proposed use. They will require the review of Tenant I.r2provement plans prior to occupanry. Further, the restaurant will be required to be fire sprinklereed. (See Exhibit "G"). B. Parking: ��� As the games are to be used by dining patrons, the instal" l�ion of the games should not generate additional parking demand, loittering •3r noise problems. There are 133 parking spaces required for the restaurant and arcade and 133 parking spaces are provided, therefore there is sufficient parking. Bicycle facilities are provided throughout the shopping centers however there are no facilities directly adjacent to the proposed restaurant. Tho installation of bike racks adjacent to the restaurant is reco7mend3d. C. Nleighborhood Compatibility: The applicant indicates that persons under 16 years o age will not be permitted into the restaurant unless accompanied ay an adult, therefore loitering should not be a problem. The noise generated from the arcade /video games and activities within the restaurant should require the c�instruction of adequate noise attenuation (See Conditions 5, 9, and :1.5). The proposed arcade is an accessory use to the permitted restaurant use. Taere are a variety of uses proposed within this canter and the existing center to the east. The restaurant /arcade's entrance and parking facilities are on the north side of the building facing away from the existi single family residences. Compatibility problems with adjace,. uses are not expected., There is one elementary school within a half -anile and two elementary schools and a junior high school within one mile of tii proposed restaurant /arcade (see Exhibit °'D "). The Cutamonga and Central School Districts have raviewed the proposal. The Districts nave no objection to the proposed arcade within Chuck E. Cheese. They do however recommend that a condition be placed on the Conditional Use Permit which will prohibit students €i -im entering the facility during school hours (See Exhibits "E" and "F" and Condition 11). PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89 -03 - SHOWBIZ PIZZA TIME April 12, 1989 Page 4 D. Neighbc�-rtood Meeting: A neighbofhood meeting was conducted on arc ,% 1837-Ai:'"that meatinp the neighborhood express,, &. 4 primary concerns: 1) Loitering (as stated ab ve, persons under 18 will not be admitted into the restaurant without an -idult). 2) noise (the construction of adequate noise attenuation tviil be required). 3) Wet trash (routine trash pica: -up for a restaurant will be expected, therefore, bests associated qi to wet trash is not expected. Spea;ial trash enclosure design was reqv red. Further aew trash bins are required to have self - closing counter- weighted lids). 4) Service of alcohol E. Environmental Assessment: `be project is CatagoriCally exemp" V dm-- provisions os a .alifornia Environmental Quality Act, Article 19, Section 15391. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 1) That the pc „oposed use is in accord with General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code as evi& =ed by the Conditional Use Pas -°:L provisions for amusement devices. 2) That the proposed use twaather, with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or rterially injurious to properties or ia,, svemenls in the vicinity. 3) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable conditions of the Development Code. V. CORRESPONDENCF: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e a3Ty"RePort newspaper, property posted and notices sent to all property -”— and existing tenants within 300 feet of the project. VI. RECOMMENDATION: In order to approve this Conditional Use Permit, e or ss on must make the findings outlined above and in the attached Resolution of Approval. If, after the hearing, the necessary findings can be made, adoption of the attached Resolution, with conditions, would iie appropriate. - -4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89 -03 - SHOWBIZ PIZZA TIME April 12, 1989 Page 5 � f Respect I tti TVs ubmttted, Bra 1 Buller City Planner EB: CK.:ml g Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Site Exhibit. "C" - Floor Plan Exhibit "V - School Radios Map Exhibit "E" - Cucaponc_;a &:tool District Exhibit "F" s Litter from Central School District Exhibit "G" - Note from Foothill Fire District Resolution of Approval I 1 ZHOWBIZ (PIZZA TIME, INC. Show6ir Pizza Pi@Q94 - Chuck E. Cheese* 4441 N ?@st Airport Frey P.O.3ox 15:077• Irving. TX 75015 214258-8507 February 27, 1989 City of Rancho Cucamonga PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 QE: Conditional Use Permit Application '.'o Whom It May Concern:: Enclosed is our application for a Conditional Use Permit for do arcade, in connec+ —a with a proposed Chuck E. Cheese's restaurant. While our o ?eration (as farther explairc: Yn the attachment to this letter) is not a typical arcade, Lire number of games we will have In this restaurant does make this Conditioual Use Permit necessary. In a new restaurant we would typically have 40 -50 tames- 5-10 Video /Skill Garr-, 15 -20 Arcade /Skill Games 10 -12 Skeeballs 10 -15 Kiddie Rides Please feel free to contact me if further information is required. Sincerely, Lola Richert Manager of Licensing LR /lo enclosure EN SHOWBIZ PIZZA TIME', INC. TYPE OF OPERATION ShowBiz Pizza Time, Inc. proposes to operate a Chuck E. Cheese's restaurant at 9339 Foothill Blvd., Suite F, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. This is a pizza restaurant and family entertainment center serving lunch and dinner. The menu includes pizza, sandwiches, salad bar, soft drinks beer and wine coolers are offered according to local rules and regulations. For family entertainment, the restaurant offers kiddie rides, arcade games, skill games, video - skill games, and computer controlled animal characters which sing songs ind tell Jokes and stories. PROPOSED -HOURS OF OPERATION Sunday through Thursday from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 P.M. Friday and Saturday from 10:00 a,m. to 11:00 P.M. The peak hours of operat -ion are Friday evenings and weekends. CLIENTELE Chuck, E. Cheese's is family oriented, Our operation is geared to appeal to families with children from 2 to 11 years of age. Children under 18 are not allowed into the facility unless they are accompanied by a parent or guardian. A large part of our business is Catering children's birthday parties. STAFFING This restaurant will employ two (2) or three (3) managers and one (1) technician, plus approximately thirty-five i35) hourly employees. During all hours of operations, at least one manager or the technician will be on duty. At all times there will be a manager on duty who is at least 21 years of age. EQUIPMENT AND SPECIAL FEATURES This facility will utilize kitchen and cooking equipment, tables, booths and dispersing equipment in connection with food and beverage service. There will be an area devoted to children with kiddie rides and a play area. There w,ll be a family area with arcade /skill games, and a dining room wit't computer controlled animated characters performing at set intervals from a stage area. There is also a small gift shop area in tt;z restaurant. C,—? f QUALIFICATION::. OF APPLICANT Integra -A Hotel and Restaurant Company (formerly Brock Hotel Corporation) )Paned the first ShowBiz Pizza Place in Marcn of 1980. ShowBiz Pizza Time, Inc. was incorporated in April of 1980, as a subsidiary of Integra -A Hotel and Restaurant Company,, In December of 1988, ShowBiz Pizza Time, Inc. became a public company, with more than 5,000 shareholders; it is no longer a subsidiary of Integra. ShowBiz Pizza Time, Inc. (ShowBiz) has been developing and operating ShowBiz Pizza Place and Chuck E. Cheese's Pizza Time Theatre restaurants since its incorparation. Currently ShowBiz owns and /or operates 130 restaurants in 22 states, with a franchise system of 133 restaurants. ShowBiz first began operating in California in April of 1982 and at this time has 28 company restaurants in California. EM Original Poor Quality FOOT"" PMFVAnD I � t ji ; u�•AR . '• — RETAL V I 1 R.wce .� � .. � � � � R•.•v. 7 SUMMAnY i 1 u••• ox '6777R0.0 asf.tu.1 1 ;< I.x.•R 11_ ea�OiRe: a..6s 7 i :� I w.aa �� u•.•. 4 UMOI0600.7 �.Oeit 1 := 1 i RJU r � � _ � IOp I.O.%II, HI. u. •'R. I .a_ I ERE FARR'G.rR ATIO tali .1. I .. 4lefA • I I . IIARWARK IIoust OF I 1 51 ATIORt115� I M.R to ,aC. •a I 1 �� S 3 .. } M •a. ..� �� _ 1 1 1 1 ff rrrrrr • r rrrrrrrrr rrrrrrr SiIOF NO3 SIIOF NOS , I ''� I 1 I IItIIt1lI11 n t111t1111l1111111 1 { UM UIM FLAN FOOTHILL VIU•A^ -C HU WZST. Co. i1 Ip l� I a-Rx. 61 I umu.•ua If I I T O .RANCHO UCAMO PT. 1111Y1\TTA7` I "TI?TCIT9% V . ITEM: CUP TIT IA: $ for .'�1 00 0-C.10 rya OEa 17 E� ±0 u Q0 ❑ Ei SCI 0 MOM I L_J 11 CITY OF RANCHO CU A fn-N A Im ITEM 407 8 7"* 03 TITLE: R&Olusk" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DAM- 3.xI 92 TO: FROM: SUBJE ';T; �l'L cl��l3t'S' o► f 6entral School District 9457 Foothill Blvd./ Rancho Cucamonga, California 71730 1 (714) 984 -8541 D NIP March 21, 1999 E� ADMINISTRATION Frank A. Cosca, Jr. Ed.D. District Superintendent Ingrid Voge'c Assistant Superintendent. Business Sen,ces Cynthia_tinser Assistant Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga, P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga., CA 91730 RE: Conditional Use Permit for Chuck B. Cheese Restaurant Dear Ms. Kinsert I am writing on behalf of Central SC'Iool District concerning the conditional use permit fc Chuck E. Cheese Restaurant. We have reviewed the description of this business. The principals if Cucamonga Junior High School, 7611 Hellman; Central School, 7955 Archibald; and Bear Gulch School, 8355 Beae Gulch place commend the intent of Show Biz Pizza Time, Inc.., to insist that "children under 1B are not allowed into the facility unless they are accompaniea,by a parent or guardian ". They are each in support of the permit as long as the facility specifically enforces this stipulation during norioal school hours. Thank you for includ�ng Central School District in the plannirg of facilities that could potentia- .y impact this district. Sincerely, JoAnn Johnson Administrative Assistant Business Services c: Principals BOARD OF TRUSTEES Hentl L Stot Antonia L. Rogers `),,.7Dtbbie Bik.r 6 •G,r4 . W—rr 6 544tv;i17' Nfa Ruth A, musser Ardirw iartnr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMoNCA - ---- �*e ----- MEMORANDUM -� DATE: -$ SUBJECT: ' yp rl RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCRj CUCAMONGA APPROVING CONDITr.i -�A USE PERMIT NO. 89- 03 FOR AN ARCAIX WITHIN A 10,000 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT, ON 8.21 ACRES (1F LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 'OOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HELLMAN AVENUE IN THE COKRJNITY COMMERCIAL OI:a'TRI.CT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208- 261 -25 b 26 A. Recitals. (i) Show Biz Pizaa Time has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 89 -03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 22nd of March 1589, and continued on April 12, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the apes - cation and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This Commission hereby specifically finds tnat all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. Z. Based upon si:bstantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- refarenc d p0lic hearings on March 22, and April 12, 1989, i,nrluding written and oral tafF reports, together with pcbli, 'ostikaory, this Commission Hereby specifically find;t: as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue with a street f,,ontace of 672 feet and lot depth of 600 feet and is presently improved with a commercial center; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site a motel, mobile home park, ind single family homes; tie property to the siuth of that site consists of sinole family homes; the property to the east is community co=. ercial and public storEge; and the property to the west is apartments; and (c) The arca:,e is located within a 14,000 square foot restaurant and is lly visible to supery sors and other pa %roas; and (d) The f:ntrance to the arcade ;;: on the noru) side of the building facing away from the stigle family residences to the south and (�, is PLANNING COWISSION RESOLMUN NO. SHOW BIZ PIZZA _ CUP 89 -03 April 12, 1984 page 9 (e) There is sufficient parking on the north Side of the building to accommodate the arcade use; and (f) The arcade is only open during the regular business hours of the restaurant use, which are Sunday through Thursday from 11:00 a.m, to 10 :00 p.m., and Friday and Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission du.,ing the above - referenced public hearing ,ind upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and Z above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan and the objectives of thy@ Development Code as evidenced by the Condit onal Use Permit prevision for amuse:z%rn devices. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will nit be detrimental to the ,ublic health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. tc) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with tF- California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and has determined it to be exempt per Article 19, Section 15301. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the appltcition subject to each and every conCjtion set forth below: 1. The arcade, and amusement devices therein, shall be limited to the same hours of opktration as the restaurant. 2. The amusement devices shall be placed in a manner that does not obstruct or crowd entries, exits and aisles. 3. Supervision for the arcades shall be provided at all times. 4. A bicycle rack shall be placed adjacent to the restaurant and shall be locates_' in a manner such that the si0awalk and exits or entries will not bF blocked. The specifications and location shall be approved by the City Planner prior to occupancy, Q --I i, I PLAN°'ING C0141ISSION RESOLUTION SHnW BIZ PIZZA - CUP 89 -03 April. 12, 1989 Page 3 S. If the operation of the Conditional Use Permit causes adverse effects to neighboring businesses or to the primary restaurant use, the Conditional Use Peivit shall be brought before the Planning Comnission for their review and possible termination of the use. 6. Occupancy of the Facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Build?ng Code and Sta- Fire Mar3hall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected fo- compliance prior to occupancy. 7. Approval of this recd ust shall not waive compliance with all sections of the aevelc -went Code and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of occupancy. 8. Any modification, relocation, increase in ti +e number of amusement Devices, expansion or other change in operation will require a revision to this Conditional Use Permit. 9. The r',eration of the arcade, games, and music shall conform with the parfi.,rmance standards for the district as contained in Rancho Cucamonga MuniciPval Code Section 17.10.050. 10, All pertinent conditions of am -oval as contained in City Council Resolution No,88 -043 shat apply. 11. No person under IS years of age may enter, be in, or remain in any part of a game arcak. 41rinq the hours school is in regular session. This limits. ^.ion shall be :prominently posted at the entrance of the facility, in letters not less than 1 inch in height, and shall be Wort,' by the supervisor. 12. Change - making or token exchanga faci`iities shall be provided for patron use inside the premises. 13. Access to the game area must be from the main entrance to the primary use and not from a separate exterior entrance. The rear exit shall be for "Fine Exit Only ". 14. Adequate interior clear space shall be provided for safe and convenient patron circulation and shall meet ttte following minimum standards: a) Amusement devices shall be located no closer than 12" from any wall assembly separating the arcade from any adjacent building or portion of a W.1 ding. C- --1 ? PLANNING C(MISSION RE9JLUTION NO. SHOW BIZ PIZZA CUP 89-03 April 12, 1989 Page 4 i b) Provide a minimum of 60 inches betoeen amusement devices an-11 any entrance or exit. c) Wh[tr4 amusement devices are located along one side of an aisle, provide a minimum unobstructed aisle width of % irk:hes. Where amusement devices iAre located along both sl.des cf artiy aisle, provide a minimum unobstructed aisle width of 90 inches. d) hi itional interior clear space may be required by the 6rildiq Dfficial, Foothill Fire District, or Sheriff's Department in order to maintain public safety. 15. The walls, ceiling or floor, or arW combination thereof, of the- building or structure, or por'7on thereof, s"ll be insulated or otterklise construc•,ed so that no vibration that is detectable withoo; tie aid of any mechanical device or instrument will be :1110rved to be on the outer perimeter of Woe arcade. 16. 'this Conditional 'U�a Permit shall be omnitored and brought back to the Planning Commission within six (6) months from occupancy to review compliance rith all Conditions of App-oval and applicable City ordirsnces. Failure to comply with Conditions of Approval or applicable City Ordinances nay cause possible revocatijre of the Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission.. 17. Approval of this request sha'ii not waive compliance with all sections of tra Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable Ci+.y vrdinances in effect at the time a Certificate of Occuipincy is granted. 18. The parking lot shall be pcstad "No Loitering" in letters not less than 1 inch in height on s?-° to the satis± '—tion of the City Planner and Sheriff s Departnent. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adopt ?on of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCM0NGA BY: ,arry T. ` l e , Chairman ATTEST: ° r a- 5 ei , Secretary 1�,' -4.11 PLANNING CMISSIQN RESOLUTION NO,. SHOW !IZ PIZZA - CUP 89-OZ April 12, 19899 Page 5 2 I, Brad Rut lei , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hmreh certify that the foregoing Resolution was Oily and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of t:te City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regFalar meriting of the Planning Commission 'held on th5 12th day of April 1989, by the following vote -to -w iv AYES: COtMiISSIONERS: NOES: CO44ISSIONERS: ALSeNT: CO{'MfISSIOURS: U Rp nchto CL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Ori inal Pees Quality April 11, 1989 0. /M��. Mr. Larry 'icNe +I, Cha:'rman Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9;730 Clear Mr. McNe i i s The Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce would like to go on record in support of Show:; ;s Pizza Time loFating a C :Kura%, E. Cheese', f 2tmi ly restaurant at Foothill Village In Rancho Cucamonga. Chuck E. Lhaese has an excellent reputatIan as a ra -illy fun center. With the closest such center currently located 20 minutes away in h:ont, lair, tie members of our Board .,f Mreztors, several of whom h,9ve yc -,ng oilloren, view the restaurant as an excellent addition to our conTnunity. Chuck E. Cheese's Is will known for Its crmmun'ty Involvement and we looK f ,3rward to this organization becoming an important part of family recreation In the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Sincerely, qri e sid n Qe m elro, t JM:Jc Cr: Pam Workings Nu ,hest ri) 8291? L TICA AJENUI SU'TE 160 + RANO'HO CUCAMONGk CALIFORNIA , .117u0 • 7141987-1012 ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . STA!,'1'F REPORT ti DATE: April 12, 1589 TO, Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: William J Silva, Deputy City Engineer BY; Paul A. Rougeau, 'traffic Engineer 1111 1 SUBJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SA &CIS FC CA = a regueW tO consider a ~ono a erns, ves for`fh- rQalignmuht of the north leg r Red Hill Country Club Drive by including a eliminate left turnsairto and out of Re hill Countrye Club to Drive 1. ABSTRACT: Tne existing ske d angle intersection of Red bill Country Club Drive and Foothill Doulevard is in close proximity -to an existing traffic sigma; at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close intersectior, spaci�.9 and stewed alignment creates operational difficulties with traffic f:ow ,)n Foothill Boulevard. At the February 8, 1989, meeting of the Planning Commission, the study - analyzing the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive (RHCC Dr.) was presented to the Commission. The analy$is con0 dered four alternatives. The staff report based on the "Tk *fi ;section Pl cation Feasibility Study" prepared for the City by Austin -Foust t >sociatfs, 'Traffic Consultants, recommended that the proposed IOW, ion of the north leg of RHCC Dr. and Foothill Boulevard intersl ^.ion, as $hor„� in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Flak), be clanged by realigiaing the north leg of RHCC rt* . to approximately 400 feet east of the present interection. This was carted Alternative 4. The Commission passed a resolution recoemending A+ternative 4 be adopted (with a multi -phase traffic signal al,uwi€ig left turns from !`oothill Boulevard on 9ieen arrow). At the march I5, 1969, meeting of the City Council, the Planning C=Wion recommendation for tle specific plan change w!s presented. After due consideration, tha Council voted to refer the amendment back to the Commission to consider additional Boulevardvin a by including eliminate naterleftdturnsrInto median ti out cf Red Hill Country Club Drive. ITBM x PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FSP 89 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 12,, 1989 AWL PAGE 2 1p The "Intersection Relocation Feasibility Study" was prepared for the G:ty by Austin -Foust Associates, Traffic Consultants, to analyze the existing intersectfoil and rei;oomnd alternatives. The study has been expanded to Include t"a analysis ,_af additional alternatives by including a raised, gurbed median on Foothill Boulevard that eliminates left, turns in qt and out of RHCG Dr. The study comes to the same conclution as before: The recommended plan proposed 400 feet east of its present location, provide a median brej�k in the Foothill Boulevard median island:, and install a -,wo -phase traffic signal (no left turn arrows). The Commission krill find several resolutions attached, from which the same or a new alt ,,rnative may be chosen. II. LOCATION: I The study area included the existing intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive with Foothill Boulevard and alternative locations. at the Sycamore Inn Zan Bernardino; Road and Baker Avenue. ANSIL The north side of Foothill Boulevard from Red hill Country Club Drive east to tile Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned Special Commercial. The south side of Foothill Boulevard front (rove Avenue to San Bernardino Road is zoned Special Corrnerciai and from San Bernardino Road to the railroad crossing is zoned G.n;(ty Commercial, Areas north and south of these commercial; zones, are zoned Residential. A San Antonio Conwinity Hospital project is proposed in an office zone at the northeast corner of Foothill Boul -vard and Grove Avenue. III. BACKGROUNDi Please refer to original staff report of February 8, 1989. IV. ANALYSIS: Alternatives 5 and d have been added to the alternatives presented In tt3 original staff report analysis. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FSP 89 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCRHONGA APRIL 12, 1989 IF PAGE 3 Alternatives 5 and 6 would construct a raised median in Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road as Illustrated in Exhibits "A" and "a ". No median opeitings wou`td be provided except at the intersections of Grave Avenue and Satz Bernardino Road. The only difference between Alternatives 6 and 6 is that the intersection cf RHCC Cr, is maintained in its present location in Alternative 5 while the realignment 400' easterly of RHCC Dr. is used in Alwernat ie 6. Field investigation discloses Iii driveways presently exist on RHCC Or. between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road which would be affected by 'these alternatives. Left -turn access to and from these driveways, which is currently permitted, will be eliminated through the planned construction of a raised medi:4. These 16 driveways will then accommodate right- turn -only movements. Peak period counts Of the left turn volume in and cut of these le driveways disclosed that relatively little left turning presently occurs Approximately 25 -left turns (total in and out) mostly Occurring dt the driverays in the vicinity of the Texaco station and Magic Lamp restaurant were abserved. In adcitiarr, a major concentratior, of eastbound left turns *ever 200 per hour) occur at RHCC Dr. Constructior of the raised median across the RHCC Dr. intersection would cause these 25 left turns to become U -turns at the intersections of $rove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. However, the nominal increase in U- turns ii, not exnected to significantly affect the level of sevvice. }however', the diversion of over 200 left turns per hour presently turning left from eastbound Foothill Boulevard onto northbound RHCC Dr. caused by the construction of a raised median is anticipated to create Some slonificant c,:.ncerns< Zor example, the 200 loft turners consist of both residents of the Red Hill area, as well as commuters using RHCC Dr. anu Alta Cuesta Drive as a "shortcut" between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Road. Residents will be diverted east along Foothill Boulevard to Carnelian Street (lineyard Avenue) 01' to he SyComore Inn where they will use the existing private road to 'RHCC Dr. Comruters may be diverted to either of these taro routes ar they rray change their travel patterns entirely and use Camptas Avenue to avoid the Red Hill area altogether. It is difficult to estimate t "a exact number of comutera and residents that will take the various routes. However, with aver 200 left terns per hour wiverted from RHCC Dr., it is reasonable to forecast that a number of them (perhaps as many as 50 per hour) will turn left into the Sy +camore Tart`s parking lot and use the existing private road for access to RHCC Dr. Although it is acknowledged that this volume is merely an estimate, it does indicate a potentially serious threat to this private parking PLANNING commrssION STAFF REPORT FSP 89 -02 .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 12, 1989 PAGE 4 lot. In adrition, some residents may choose to make a. U -turn at the Sycamore Inn and "backtrack" to RACC Dr., rather than drive through the Sycamore Inn parking lot. It seems doubtful that any commuters would backtrack in such a manner. They are -iRre likely to use the Sycamore Inn and private road, or proceed ,ri east to Carnelian Street. In order to prevent the Sycamore Inn parking lot and adiacz-!t private road from becoming a "through street ", ?t way be necessary to construct some sort of gate across the private road. Finally, even if the Sycamore Inn parking lot can be p-otected against becoming a by -pass route for RHCC Dr., the segment of RHCC Dr, which inter ° >r:ts Carnelian Str -t will experience a significant increase in traffic as residents themselves are forced to use this entrance instead :,f Foothill Boulevard. In summary, closures of the left -turn access of RHCC Dr. and Foothill Boulevard could create potentially significant impacts as traffic diverts thrbig the Sycamore !nn's parking lot and /or, increases sr+;,sta.iticlly the existing traffic on the segment of RHCC Dr. west of Carnelian Street. Alternative 5 has one other potentially sivifica.:t traffic impact. The present intersection or RHCC Dr. and Foothill Boulevard is located less that 300 feet east of Grove Avenue. Westboufld traffic often backups 9 to 10 car lengths (250 feet) during the neak hours, thereby, virtually blocking the present RHCC Dr. inte &ectiun. Right turning traffic exiting this intersection would encounter significant difficul 4 entering thin westbound flow and find it virtually iivossiblc 'to weave across three through lanes to enter the westbound left -turn pocket at Grove Avenue. Relocation of the RHCC Dr. to a point 745 feet east of Grove Avenue (as shown in AI W- native 4;t would eliminate this weaving situation. Alternative 5 and 6 each raise one additional concern regarding circulation- -i.e,, that of access for urgency vehicles to RHCC ur. from eastbound on Foothill Bouleva ^d. Since the fire department uses the left -turn lane at Re1CC Dr. for Emrgetcy access, it would be necessary, to provide a break in the median for use by emiergency vehicles os:ly. TS s could presumably include police and nmbulance, as wail as fire vehicles. This median opening would be signed for use by emergency vehicles only. However, continual police enforcement could probably be required to prevent its usa by others. Alternatives 5 and 6 both offer similar advantages as disadvantages, and these are summarized below: 0- L.:� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FSP 89 -02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 12, 1989 PAGE 5 Advantages (both Alternatives) 1. A substantial reduction in traffic is created on RHCC Or., particularly the southerly segment, 2. The cost of Alternative 5 is the 101test cost alternativt-. 3. Congestion at the RHCC Dr. and Foothill Boulevard intersection Is practically eliminated except for Alternative 5 where severe difficulty would be encountered in the we.�•aing maneuver between RHCC Dr. and Grove Avenue. Disadvantages (both Alternatives) I. Residents are re- dive;iyed to use the carnelian Street entrance of 4HCC Dr., thereby significantly i,rreasing traffic on that segment, as well as creating substantial out -of- direction travel for residents. 2. Sycamore Inn's narking lot and the -4xisting private road connection to RHCC or, is expected to 'oecuna a substitute by- pass route as residents and commuters al!ike divert to alternate routes. 3. A specially designed median opening would be necessary at RI'CC Dr. for use by emergency vehicles with continual taw enforrameat applied to ensure that it was not used by the public. Suffmary cif Realignment_ Alternative Analysis Investigation of the feasibility of relocating the intersection of RHCC Dr. and Foothill Boulevard indicates not only that such is possible, bk:t highly desirable since it will not only itrprove the traffic flow conditions on Foothill Boulevard, but prov4do a &jail but sigr-rficant deterrent to continued commuter traffic use of the RHCC Or. and Alta Cuesta Drive "sliort cut" -4hrough tW ,;;JCE Dr. residential area. Of six alternatives ir0stigated, Alternative 4, realigning RHCC Dr. throigh a vacant lot 400 feet vast of its present , ntersection with Foothill Boulevard, C °zar)y marges as superior to the others in nearly every respect. Three of the alternatives involve limited sight dlstan ^4 which, unless vastly improved, Mould itself reader these alternatives unfeasible, Every If this restriction could be solved, and tilough subs"ntial regrading to the Red Hill would be possible, the remaining advantaged of vk vecon.nended alternative far excesd those of the ' other `andidates. Two of tkm atterrratives (5 and 6) invo�+re PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT FSP 89 -02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 12, 1989 PAGE 6 potential use of the Sycamore Inn's parking lot as a substitute by -pass routing and a substantial diversion of residents' own travel patterns. As a result, it is recommended that the City pursue an acquisition of a vace;nt parcel of land on the north side of Foothill Boulevard 400 feet east of RHCC Or, for the purH,jse of relocating and realigning RHCC Or, and signalization of a new Intersection located midway between two existing signals at Foothill 3oulevard and Grove Avenue and at Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road, It is further recorwnded tit &t full left -turn access be provided at the new RHCC Dr. and Foothill Boulevard intersection and that this location be signalized and mimed to discourage commter use s,hile at the saw time permitting motorists to entee albeit encountering sossewhat mark delay than is Currently experienced. V. ENVIROX+K:NTAL 6LUSSI ENT.- Sang as original staff report, VI. F, ACTS FOR FINOING5: Sam: as ortyina'd. VII< RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends public hearing discussion of the proposed Foathill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment, including the additional alternatives. Attached are throe different resolutions, one each for Alternatives 4, 5 or 6. If the Planning Commission finds one of these alternatives acceptable, the Planning Commission should adopt the �2ppropriate resolution recommeading approval of Amendment 89 -42 to the Fe Chill Aoulevard Specific Plan. Respectfully sv;)mittfd, William J. Silva, P.E. Deputy r,,ty Engineer WJS,PAR:sd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Alternative S Exhibit "B" Alternative 6 Stuff Report of Febrrary 8, In -depth Engineering Study, 1 `� 13+39 updated March 29, 1:989 E 0 E in x ui 1� C7 1 •r 103 C Af 1 II 11 111 "JJ 11 Ilt �- f 11 11 11 fl ■ 11 If I �U I 11 t1 1t It K7 a 0 .�o ail AA j , I I` Jic -m..,... i �xr Its is 9 �I �/ • '�R ii r,• ; A i •+r v � e �-s 7 _ i Im \ � � ••A�IrA 1 g A•� � r 4 •I A I• H zA A: � l AA I t� AA AA AA A A i 7 _ i Im CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.A ac STAFF REPORT DATE: February 8, 1989 i! 10: Chairman and Members of #the Planning Coarnission FROM- William J. Silva, Deputy City Engineer BY: SUBJECT: Traffic Engineer Club Drive and too- the Spa_cific Plan, Club Drive to app. intersection with F I. ABSTRACT: U ,ucaWon OT ine Rea tim Country I Boulevard intersection, as shown in the realignment of Red Hill Country nately IM feet east of the present. iiil Boulevard. The existing skewed angle intersection of Red Hill Cuuntry Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an existing traffic signal at Grove Avenue.. The combin- -tion . -f this close Intersection spacing and skewed alignment creates operational difficulties with traffic flow on Foothill Sculevard. An "Intersection Relocation Feasibility Study" was prepared for' CinAu set on analyze City by existing Assoc., recmmendalternat alternatives. he recommended plan proposes to relocate the intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive approximately 400 feet east of its present location, provide a medier, break in the Foothill Boulevard median island, and install a two phase traffic signal Eno left turn arrows). II. LOCATION: The study area Included the existing intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive with Foothill Boulevard and alternate locations at the Sycamore InnSan Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue. Exhibit "A" shows the study zrea. The north side of Foothill Boulevard from Red Hill iCountry Club Drive east to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned Special Corra►arcial. a PLANNING COK41SSION STAFF REPORT FBSP 89 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA FEBRUARY 8, 1989 PAGE 2 The south side of Foothill Boulevard from Grove A�,anue td San Bernardino Road is zoned Special Commercial and from San 3ernardino Road 'to the railroad cf- dssing is zoned Community Commercial. ,'areas north and south c' these commercial zones are zoned Residential. A San Antonio Cc:m-,unity Hospital proj4ct is proposed in an office zone at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. 111. BACy MUND: Red Hill Country Club Drive presently connects to Foothi> Boulevard in a skewed angle intersection in close proximity to the signalized intersection at Grove Avenue, The combination of this close intersection spacing and skewed angle creates operational problems with traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard and makes infeasible any type of traffic control other than the existing two -way stop. Red Hill Country Club Drive and Alta Cuest, Drive also form a continuous link between Ptt -thill Boulevard and Base Line Road. Tye existence of this cor'nection creates a by -pass routing for commuter traffic to avoid longer trips involving either Carnelian Street on the east or Cat,pus Avenue an tf- west. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (FBSP) recognized these problems and recommended an alignment of Red Hill Countt,y Club Drive that in'.ersects Grove Avenue, as shown on Exhibit "B". The City Council at its meeting of September 21, 1988, directed staff to process an amet °4nent to the FBSP to revise the raai igr ant of Red Hill Country Club Drive. The City hired the traffic engineering firm of .,ustin•,,ast Assoc. to prepare an in -depth traffic engineering study of tfe problem. The final resort, " Intersection Relocation Feasibility Study," is attached. IV. ANALYSIS: The existing intersection of vothill Botilevara and Red Hill Country Club Drive is $ W ciew for reasons sta � :d in Section III above. An in -depth analysi was proposed that studied the realignment of Red Hill .Country Club Drive at various locations, show on Exhibit "C ", Alternatives 1, 2 and 3 (Baker Avenue and Sycamore Inn east and west) all have a substant.,,1 sight distance deficie,icy to overcome. These three alternatives would connect to Red Hill Country Club Drive by exp��nding an existing private read 11 ISEL PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FBSP F 32 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGI'. FEBRUARY 8, 1987 PAGE 3 intersection southerly of a .right -hand curve (as viewed by southbound traffic) approximately 300 feet south of Calle Carabe. However, adequate sight distance for the intersection cannot be provided without substantial hillside grading or realignment of the Red Hill Country Club curve. If this problem could be solved, the resulting alignments would be as shovin on Exhibit "D ". Hoioever, the best possible design speed that can be obtained is 25 MPN. This is not realistic due to the grade of Red Hill, A reasonable realistic niniinum design speed would be 35 V,PH. To obtain 35 MPH design spepe would require regrading most of the hillside. Presuming- that the problems of sight distance and minimum design speed can be overcome,, analysis was conducted of the effects of those three alternatives. ALTERNATIVE 1 - ' Extending Baker Avenue north of Foothill Boulevard-, The most significant advantage for this alternative is that by -pass traffic comint from the west could be encourager' to proceed on to Carneliai Streat rather than use Red Hill Country Club Drive since it would involve some backtracking, albeit a mirror amount. This " advantage" is offset by the following thFud significant disadvantages: 1. Tne existing railroad and „rossi.,q limits the width of Foothill F;.ulevard to four narrow trove? lanes. The existing b, : Qe makes the i nstai lati un of an eastbound l eft -turn on Fuuthill Boulevard at Baker difficult since the roa;lway is limited to four travel lanes through the undecrossinq. Providing the eastbound left -t5irn lane for a sufficient distance to accommodate the left -turns could reduce the travel lane A dths to an unsatisfactory condition, It is recognized tW ;is condition would not exist in the future after c�w:.n °lt Boulevard has been widened to its ultimate width. Hokme.rr, although tentative bridge widening studies are underway, no firm date is set for cony +_ruction. Therefore, vEN retacation of Aed Hill Country Club Drir. would be czv:tingent upon ccnapletion of the railroad bridge widening. 2. Relocating the Red Hill Country Club Drive intersection east of the railroad uadercrossing increas_� the traff c v0 ume �n Foothill Boulevard � this critical nairvow four -lane sz -tion by about 4,000 ADi. This would have significant aithdegh short term negative impac4 on traffic fiow in this area F P! I? _ 0701 -02 A -12 -89 PO Agenda 3. of 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FBSP 89-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FEBRUARY 8, 1989 PAGE 4 Aft 3. The cost of constructing Red KAI Country Club Drive under the railroad would be quite costly, much more sq than any other ­ alternative. . L ALTERNATIVE 2 AND 3 Red Hill Country Club Drive lo:.ated west or east of e ycamore Inn: The primary advantage would be that the new Red Hill Country Club /Foothill Boulevard intersection would become simply an expansion of an existing four -way intersection and the present skewed intersection would be eliminated. A new signalized intersection is not created. Another advantage is that unlike the Baker Street alternative, (Alternative 1) roothm Boulevard could be restriped to siY lanes permitting the additional 4,000 ADT from Red Hill Country Club Drive tc. be accommodated immediately. This advantage is counter - balanced by the following disadvantages. I. The existing Sycamore Inn parking lot would be separated from the building by a new roadway. This in effe,t creates an off - site parking lot with its associe,z*t pedestrian safety concerns as patrons would have to cro:; ; % roadway with over 4,000 daily trips. 2. The minimum design speed of 35 MPH ..�anot be obtained_. The "best" design speed achievable is 2V 7,47, "which should not be acceptable. 3. Even a minimum roadway width (35 Peat) creates serious disruptions of the existing parking lot. 4. The right -of -way necessary for these alternatives is substantial. ALTERNATIVE 4 - Reap? n Red dill Country Ciub Drive {;o a location approx mately- 400" -fee eas a ms presen oca ion This alternative has become the Recommended Plan and is shown in Exhibit "E". This alternative offers the following advantages. I. The minimum acceptable design speed of 35 MPH with adequate intersection sight distance can be achieved. 2. A computerized simulation of the traffic operation of the resulting signal system indicates the proposed intersection spacing will facilitate the movement of through traffic on Foothill Boulevard with«;+ backing traffic into adjacent intersections and a good coordinated signal progression can be achieved.* �..i PLANNING .COMMISSION STAFF REPORT F @SP 89 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FEBRUARY 8, 1989 IF PAGE 5 * An analysis of the impact on existing peitk hour traffic flow conditions was conducted by using a computer traffic flow simulation program, TRANSYT -7F. The existing !%/,pals on Foothill Bdulevard at Grove Avenue and at San Bernardino Road and new two- phase signal (i.e., no separate left -turn arrows onto Red Hill !Country Club Drive) was analyzed at the recommended Alternative 4 location. The results indicate that in order to provide a satisfactory level of service in the PM' peak hour, three (3) eastbound travel lanes on Foothill are necessary. In addition, unless a separate left -turn phase is provided for eastbound Foothill Boulevard to northbound Red Hill Country Club Road, the existing peak hour demand of 298 left turns per hour will be limited to a maximum of about 160. This will effectively fr:jction as a "meter" restricting the number of commuters using Red Hill Country Club Crive as a by -pass routing between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Avenue during the PM peak hour. When a four -lane cross section on Foothill Boulevard is analyzed, the PM peak hour is 114 percent of capacity , ar, una ^ceptable condition, To mitigate this condition, either the signal rot Red !fill Country Club Drive must be eliminated, or a third eastbound "thru" lane must be provided. It would be recommended that Foothill Boulevard be restriped to provide six (f) travel lanes in the segment between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. 3. Although the relcration would permit signalization of the new Red Hill Country Club Drive at Foothill Boulevard, the existing intersection could be retained as a two -way stop. 4. The proposed new signal at Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard could act as a "meter" for limiting traffic onto northbound Red Hill Country Club Drive, while this would not prevent commuter use, it would severely limit such usp and act as a deterrent to continued future increases (analyzed with item 2) . 5. The right -of -way acquisition required is minimal compared to other alternatives. WAJ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FBSP 89 »02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM1ONGA FEBRUARY 8, 1989 PAGE 6 Additional Analysis of Existing Location: The effect of Agnalixing the oxis..nq location was also analyzed by the computer traffic flow simulation program. The analysis shows that there is insufficient space to store ieft� turning vehicles at Red Hill Country Club Drive and Grove Avenue. To accoae odate adequate left -turn storage, Grove Avenue and Red Hill Country Club Drive must be separated by a minimum of 555 feet. The existing spacing i5 less than 460 feet. These figures are based on a traffic signal cycle length of 100 seconds. It is very likely that future traffic growth will require a longer cycle and the pocket length would then need to be longer. if the left turn pockets are not long enough, cars waiting for a left turn will have to wait ir, the thru traffic 'lane, a potentially hazardous condition. Neither a traffic signal, nor a median break, should be installed at the existing location of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard. Summary of Proposed Realignment: Investigation of the feasibility of relocating the intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive /Foothill go),"-,vard indicates not only that such is possible, but desirable sin( tt will not only improve the traffic flow conditions en Foothill . loulevard, but provide a small deterrent to continued comriuter traffic use of the Red Hill Country.Club Drive /Alta Cuesta Drive "short cut" through the Red Hill Country Club Drive residential area. Of four alternatives investigato,d, Alternative 4 realigning Red Hill Country Club Drive through a vacant lot approximately 400 feet east of the Present intersection with Foothill Boulevard, clearly emerges as superior to the other three. The other alternatives involve limited sight distance which, unless vastly improved, would itself render these alternatives infeasihle. Even if this restrict :or, could be solved, and though substantial regrading to the Red Niel would be possible, the remaining advantages of the recommended Alternative 4 exceed those of Alternatives ;, 2 or 3. It is recowended that full left -turn access be provided at tae proposed R0 Hill Country Club Drive /Foothill Boulevard intersection and that this location be signalized without left -turn arrows and timed to discourage commuter use while at the same time permitting motorists to enter, encountering somewhat more delay than is currently experienced. E; PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FBSP 89 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA F'EGRUARY 8, 1989 PAGE 7 V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN In conjunction !pith the application, arj Initial Study /Preliminary Environraenta', Assessment, in conformity with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Acv, has been prepared and the proposal would have no significant adverse effect on the environment. T'lerefore, the Planning Commission may make a finding of no significant imiact on the environment and recommend certification of a Negat!ve Declaration. VI. FANS FOR FINDINGS: a) The amene,:lient does riot conflict with the circulation policies of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and a) ►ha amendment promotes the goals of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; .nd c) The amendment i^uid not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. VII. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends public hearing discussion of the prsposed Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment. If the Planning Commmissior, agrees with the above Analysis and Facts for Finding„ the Planning Commission should adopt the attached resolution recommending approval of Amendment 89 -02 to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Respectfully submitted, William J. Silva, P.E. Deputy City Engineer WJS:CBM:sd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "8" - Red Hill Country Club Drive realignment presently as shown in FSP Exhibit "C" -_alternatives 1, 2, 3 and 4 Exhibit "D" - Alignment Studies for Alternatives 1, 2 and 3 Exhibit "E" - Alternative 4 - Recommended Plan In -depth Engineering Study 0 -It Orig..tat Poor Quality ci • 11 11 11 11 Q: t jt ? ri we 1 All u�ii UO. a c1.�d/� 0 M �l a L� 1 Cd o q oW W j C irsowa3H.. U Y RC p' '1 Y i ee� e• J 0 midi it 4 Uj i .�. Q 2 ¢ QQ � 6 m h _ cc C N 1 LUI a 3Av z K z -+ c a x � Wa f• K N W Y � t!3 AdqIk U. a u N I� X03 I I! D2a J z O H S O � 0 a J 2 a `a 2 C W 0 2 O Exhibit 7.1.3 Red Hill Reallcfnment Currently, iced Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Red Hill vnlll be realigned in orler to promote an efficient and stltfe -t'r'ansition to Foothill Boulevard, A pr4ferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios: - The selected alignment is shown on this page. I i I r r or13a1 Redh1ltt'Reatignment = " AUDI CIRCUCATtON CONCEPT 11 -7,8 -� 17 u. O� J ^J ct w uw q, uj La CU LL a ^� ' ttKL7ti GAL u - nM.t Ga L -� Y Gd t za s 1 ' 1f7 a` 3�•^r \ •� `d1 [`.11 Z] f !� a t..: r ri :a' 1 n ?\ da ¢ _ �0 1 X01 , a CC C3 cz Ax is w x . Lu Q p 0Q\A rr i r�� 0 C3 � 8 cr v ugtz a j A X=mo > S s1.t ev n ge cs v- 0 u. a cr- 0�.� 1 ON ^ia a ci LU of I E12— � W W lJ �Gf/ v C IL N e n .+ � N � .... •..�. /` \ ,.yet....\ � V �.... �� pJ � r drip, to LLI cc LLI '�� � � cm y� 4 " 00Ilp fric .�> tit 1 `I —j CL 0 n z w 0 0 W x U 2 N } 6 U Q N N d F� N O' k II !, !, rt i / > rr rr llam- -mom Vr. •. rr �rr !! rr rr ar .! � rr Ir ! r � r• -kEfr` ' 1 `I —j CL 0 n z w 0 0 W x U 2 N } 6 U Q N N d F� N O' k o vti$�� o 4 �g ti GP�o rl sGQasGaioC P��o�oP � O F ac �aeY• Zo°• 1 4seQ� ®C sot 4 °°SS NO O to a 92 0 Al 061 b P CORRhCTION T T*** '1* * T T* T T T T* T T** T `T ** LILJ E �i RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DROT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION RELOCATION FEASIBII TY S'T'UDY Prepared for CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Prepared by. Austin- Foust Associates, Inc. 1450 North Tustin Avenue, Suite 108 Santa Ana, California 92701 ? March 29, 1.989 i i lam_ i TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Methodology Ex!stiag Conditions Identification of Alternative Alignments Analysis of 'Baker Extension Analysis of Sycamore Inn Alternatives Analysis of Vacant Parcel Alternative Analysis of Rais(4 Median Simulated Traffic Flow Analysis Analysis of Existing Intersection Location Prohibition of Left -turns at Red Dili Country Club Drive Summary and Recommendation LIST OF FIGURES ELI . NO. I Vicinity Map 2 Peak Hour Volumes 3 Realignment. Alternatives 4 Sycamore Ina-=d Baker Street Alternatives S Recommended Plan 6 Alternative 5 7 Alternative 6 Appendix .. EW 1 i 2 6 9 14 I 10 12 17 18 20 22 a 1:1 IN, JCCiON The City of Ra"ho Cucamor a has conducted a study of the feasibility of relocation of the intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive (RUCCD) and Foothill Boulevard (SR -66). Red Hil; Country Clab Drive intersects with Alta Cuesta Drive forming a continuous link between Base Line Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Both RHCCD and Alta Cuesta Drive are typical two - lane residential streets. The existence of the connection creates a "by -pass" routing for commuter traffic !o avoid a somewhat longer trip involving either Carnelian Street on the east, or Campus Avenue on the west. No other connection is available for motorists to travel from Base Line Avenue to Foothill iu the one mile segment between Carnelian Street and Campus Avenue, causing RHCCD /Alta Cuesta to be used as a "short- i�,it.- In addition vi the commuter -by-pas' chnraetsristic of travel patterns on Red Hill Country Club Road, it's connection with Foothill Boulevard creates a skewed intersection which is calso in close proximit7 to an existing signal at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close intersection spacing and skewed alignment creates operational problems with traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard and effectively makes unfeasible any type of traffic control other than the existing two -way stop condition at the present location of RHCCV and Foothill Boulevard, The purpos t of this analysis is to investigate potential relocation /realignment of the intersection to determine if such is feasible, and if so, is signalizatioa possible, and what impact would relocation and signalization have on committer use of the Red Hill Country Club /Alta Cuesta by -pass. M14ETii0PMOGY The methodology utilized for this study involved the preparation of a comps ter traffic model whit'% simulated existing traffic flow conditions on Foothill Boulevard and evaluated the effect on traffic flow if the intersection were to be relocated and signalized. The traffic model employed in a widely accepted computer program Sponsored by Caitrans, an known as TRANSYT -7F (TRAffic Network StudY Tool), In addition to the computerized signal analysis of potential sites for relocating the intersection was evaluated through a comb;nation of field observation and 40 -scale conceptual design engineering. EXISTING CONDITIONS The gereral vicinity of the study area alotig wish the specific location of RHCCD and AIta Cuesta .rive are illustrated in Figure 1. Existing peak hour traffic volumes at critical intersections along Foothill Boulevard are shown in Figure 2. Table 1 presents typical peak hour volumes and A DTs in the study area. The existence of several topographic features, such as the Cucamonga Canyon Wash, the Southern Pacific Railroad, and the Red Hill Country CIub combine to effectively limit circulation between Base Line and Foothill Boulevard to the RHCCD /AIta Cuesta 'Drive connection. The City has exainir ^d this condition and holds out hope that the situation can be at least partially mitigated through redesign of the Foothill Boulevard /RHCCD in ersection. However, AFA's subsontial experience in residential traffic control of similar residential streets suggests that short of installation of me type of "i verterl on the route, it appears doubtful that any major reduction of traffic can be achieved.. However, ,nough relocation of the intersection ai.d signaliaation,'"a form of "metering" can =ur which reduces current peak hour traffic ar,d tends to "Fold the line" against any further increases in the future. Foothill Boulevard is presently striped with tour travel lanes, and a left -turn median. Traffic signals exist at two intersections: Grove Avenue and the San Bernardino /Sycamore Inn Driveway. The intersection of Batter Avenue and Foothill Boulevard is currently stop sign controlled (two way), but signal. -Stion is planned in future year 1'i t9/1990. The total distance between these two intersections is 2,750 feet (1,5A5 feet between Grove and Sall Bernardino, and 1,200 feet between Baker and San Bernardin ). Ultimately. Foothill Boulevard is planned as a six -lane divided highway. Sufficient width currently exist between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road to permit implementation of the six -lane cross- section. East of San Bernardino Road, Foothill Boulevard Harrows to pass under the railroad tracks which permits only four - travel lanes. Plans are currently underway to witien this uadercrossing with design in future year 1989/1.990, and construction beginning in future year 1990/1991. Red Hill Country Club Drive is a typically narrow two -lane winding residential -type roadway which traverse a steep grada up what is locally kttown as "Red Hill" north of Foothill. Boulevard as it meanders around the golf course and through the residential area and transitions into Alta Cuesta Drive. Although the alignment of RHCCD is eurvalinear throng }.out its entire length, a significant curve exists in the alignment adjacent to tea golf course 300 jftk feet south of the Caile Carabe intersection. This curve is significant since its existence 2 4� ®�S4W T,9YC1®ICY9IlI -,—z Original Poor Cuaiity _�4V .N7 l 3 bMf1e1�, , - _nv Von 1;� Ay NVWi73H.. cr .o 1J N A tnOw "i AC 9 I <3 iA•.Mn f3 pA w 73V agolll 7 5'` ,Q !t i :711 7 C 1S M011 y 19 N 11 ' r OOAOAAI Y3 N11 A. Nit? r`9 O�¢'a Y „ 03. •i f 1 MOII. � QAY AY L �• AY � �% � _�c OAY � t( � aAl � 7 L'Y a `a '~" (5Qt - • Y �' Ya crt' .J Cy 0 2 1J t �aj,£S• G ° y ...� W nv ••1,737 vo 1•MY•y Annue.J �- t3nuY 13NUYa' dv < �. ti �f � ��G h m �g � ar3a H vov $ 1 = Ld •a v Will ; 3 ■= it `' Is cal f G1 Z 5'+ �� J a$ €a' c v�F �aY Nut ~.73310 H f 11V AV aOaMH]NVY6� fL� �sLL. ad'dA3 DI. F4 c 74 > > ° Ho¢Ar s °fl t3 m ! A7 visa .fay Is NVI13N6V�.. 7N �y S AV 3NaaaYin: V. 0]tlY 13 +t 4y.�h Q Io li x A. rdrN •^ cd..ej e.fl mete• J S y Q V A tl :' [t W 7151A- 72i2i31S m 5 JSYP ` !b �' VA �L'7 J jl. A tll`t3R� b tl151A 3117/1 a/ A Z3 ,r • �+ ` 1 9 �',�n6t ...• N L? •�S � c d" l7 0 �.f °9 �� •'-�i�4 JYiN P µ " 3n t"•t aA, 0 9 -3 C 3s1 4 N7 1' !� VN3a79 � ' v -4i 1340] 1 I 154 IM Is f�V I 'Z70aAt3'19NY2 �, ,.tom � 0/b -�•- '° :S b J d Y 3a0Yw <> tlaA SSCn1` .-� tO_. ! '. 7;' rn` f'. D a j I -�1=•. Y14 Af i a AV SVV t f tt ! I 1 gel r, Zi .4 °tn OOtB ¢ Y' 1 w SJd""e raw" 1yK`a: A1' Nlbl Ix. In ccB�Irx.° = R j '3f IS n1c1 3t; '.tS YCM: mot• •'i ° 13 <j1t ' = U.N. 'A! 0sm►• A7 oa '� e u c ,;. 1 It: \fA ; ►� w NOi0P0Im r {.. AV N111 Z AV ?J 7LI1 fA °•e`�.lt ,6 °iyb� 1 tf7 nonvN u x A nl' p V A7 N10) h LQ'Is' i. AV Iq� KL01 AV N16 v f 3 fir'. `. ;••'.� I r�7 W o 3AV Y• Iti J ut fq x ML6 z 4. I a 3S r 3•tn h s m = AV Ml Y V oBor 2 Usi AV will N..N aoal 14-0 w er A AM 7 h. G as i3norlt+e� �' V ,� N AV 13. W - I tunas wA c Ifa S!M - AV AL� Am •t+ in eo) ! ham— µ�y V < is ^N.Yt -0 NOISNIM iA u AV nlb y z I AV us � 3 � 51 �n3 K a A7.. .ate. AV Q!1£„ AV A311314 `i n� A3113H5 b I F °! ti ~ 88 r* I U AV v1 1n u acE n ' A7 ONE I.. AV r. aNZ 8 - I 3 B a All I is z r �c�ni n7 oosf ;(�I - w �. AVl „3�. V Lsl ` _ ^• 0]21-1 10001 009I/� OOC n�ln •f oui f: �. f'1 •rf 1 ni'1r1A7 f rll 1 I I ,7 LLJ 0 m C) I LLJ ry LLI L.LJ �!e > O re, ....... . N 0 > In WA I- 1 0 z ry < LLJ of gto z 0 m . z Lul < VI) Lr, I I ,7 LLJ 0 m C) I LLJ ry LLI L.LJ �!e > O re, ....... . N 0 > In WA I- E k \ K IC w a g # ■ q § g f = 3 - } ut k k } k . .. & . severely Ittaits the sight distance of any driveway and /or potential intersections in close proximity to this curve. Several of the alternative RHCCD realignment options contemplate the use of at, existing narrow private drive which connects to the Sycamore Inn parking lot and Foothill Boulevard via the signal at San Bernardino / Sycamore Inn Driveway. Another option would continue this linkage with Foothill Boulevard along the base of.the hillside to connect at Baker. Avenue. The existence of this curve is significant, because without major realignment of either RHCCI) or the private roadway through the twills along with substantial earthwork, adequate sight distance for the potential intersection cannot be achieved. IDENTIFICATION OF ALTERNATM ALI NM Figure 3 illustrates the potential alternative alignmeuts investigated'. It shou.d be noted tliat three of these alignments contemplate use of an existing private street which connects RHCCD with the Sycamore Inn's parking tot. The fourth alternative envisions connecting. RHCCD with Foothill Boulevard thrn.ugh a vacant parcel of land. This alternative would crate a new mtersectior, situated half way between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road /Sycamore Inn driveway. In addition to the four alternatives shown in Figure 3, two otheu alternatives were examined. These two alternatives simply involve construction of a raised median on Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. Alternative 5 retains RHCCD in its present Iocation, while Alternative 6 relocates RHCCD to that proposed in Alternative 4. The first threw alternatives all involve expanding an existing private roadway intersection located southerly of a right -hand curve (as viewed by southbound traffic) approximately 300 feet south of Calle Caro-be. Figure 4 illustrates these alternatives. Udlizatioa of this private roadway in its present configuration and alignment is not feasible, since adequate sight ristance °or the intersection cannot be provided without substantial regrading and realignment of the RHCCD curve. A diagram depicting this sight distance limitation is provided in the Figure 4. In addition, the private roadway, which is only 20 to 22 feet in width, would have to be widened by a minimum of 12 feet or more to satisfy minimum design criteria for a residential street. Presuming that the adequate sight distance could be provided around the curve on RHCCD, the resulting alihnments would be similar to that depicted in Figure 4. This Figure illustrates the minimum curve radii to achie-_ ,, absolute minimum design speed of 25 s piles per hour. However, use of a 25 MPH design speed cannot be recommended since spseds coating 5 unginai Poor Quality w Z;16 1Y >�I LU \j� W>ax<i ry w wa`ac w w�wQ w AV S�¢Q > nb x�so > tj4Vw E1 V 'I UJ UQQU. p ELI cd LLJ 14 P6— J Uj OUh J a Cf) CC UP IE Q ^ W I- A � u <C�^.Q p AV, j moo > � 1 40%.L r4 a 1'i' �) \ nib ';' UXJ ftwv\; EIC3 • O A 1 5 •IV �i m e 15 i Uj C°d\ '"' °°d\ d dow:, cne Red Hill grade would tend to excess 25 MPH unless the motorists were to "ride she brakes" to slow their vehicles. A more reasonable and realistic minlnsam design speed would have to be 35 MPFI, but such is virtually impossible to ar§:ove without wholesale regrading of the hillside. ANALYSIS OF BARER EXTENSION (ALTERNATIVE 1) Presuming that the problems of sight distance and minimum design speed can be overcome, and analysis was conducted of what would be the affect on traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard if Baker Avenue were extended to the north. Perhaps the most significant advantage is that by -pass traffic coming from the west could be encouraged to proceed on to Carnelian Street rather than use RHCCD since it would involve some backtracking, albeit a minor amount. This 4advantage10 is offset by three significant disadvantages. These 1. The existing railroad under - crossing limits the width of Foothill Boulevard to four narrow travel lanes. The existing br ode makes the installation of an eastbound left - turn on Foothill Boulevard at Baker difficult since Cie roadway is limited to four travel lanes through the undercrossing. Providing the eastbound left -turn lane for a sufficip, ,t distance to accommodate the left -turns could reduce the travel lane widths to an unsatisfactory, condition. It is recognized that this condition would not exist is the future condition after Foothill Boulevard has been widened to its ultimate width. However, although tentative bridge widening studies are underway, no firm date is set for construction. Therefore, the relocation of RHCCD would be contingent upon completion of the railroad bridge widening. 2. Relocating the RHCCD intersection east of the railroad undercrossing increases the traffic volume on Foothill Boulevard in this critical narrow four -lane section by about 4,000 ADT. This a buid have significant negative impact on traffic flow in this area. 3. The cost of constructing RHCCD under the railroad would be qu +`id costly, much more so than any other alternative. 14'. 1 9 ANALYSIS QF SYCAMORE TNN AL`PERNATTVES (ALTERNATIVES 2 and 3) Presuming the sight distance and Grading problems at the RHCCD /private road intersection can be overcome, the trade -offs involvNd whit realigning RHCCD around the ;;sycamore Inn was evaluated. The primary advanr ge would be that the new RHCCD /Foothill Boulevard intersection would become simply an expansion of an existing four -way intersection and the present skewed intersection eliminated altogether. A tiew signalized intersection is not created. Another advantage ;s that unlike for the Balser Street alternative, (Alternative 1) Foothill Boulevard could be restriped to six lanes permitting the additional 4,000 ADT from RHCCD to be accommodated immediately. This advantage is count+lr- balanced by a number of disadvantages. These inciudet 1. The existing Sycamore ina parking facilities are set. bated from. the building by a new roadwz,y. This in effect creates an off -site parking lot with its associated pedestrian safety concerns as patrons would have to cross a roadway with over 4,000 ADT. 2. Although minimum design speed (35 MPH) z( 35 MPH canngl be obtained. The "best" design speed achievable is 25 MPH which should not be acceptable. of 3. Even a minimum roadway width (36 feet) .,reates serious disruptions of the existing parking facility. 4. The right -of -way acquisition necessary for these alternatives is substantial. ANALY51S dF VACANT PARCEL ALTERIVATM (ALTERNATIVE 4) The fourth alternative evaluated involves realigning RHCCD from its ;,resent location a,,proximately 400 feet easterly through a vac mt lot tm the north side of Foothill Boulevard. T As alternative has become the Recommended, Platt and is shown in Figure S. This alternative offers a number of advantages. These include: 1. The minimum acceptable design speed of 35 MPH with adequate intersection sight distance can be achieved. (Assumes superelevation.) k\ _—.3�zo I pt -M+ III V #tlA& J I L � � P L tf1 C! L � � G C JJg 4 E C U U 0 0 R Q V T 2. A computerized simulation of the traffic operation of the resulting signal system indicates the proposed intersection spacing will facilitate the movement of through traffic on Foothill Boulevard without backing t;.affic into adjacent inter :.ctions and a good coordinated signal progression can be achieved. (The results on the TRANSYT 7F t:omputer analysis is included in the Appendix.)' In addition, although the relocation would permit signalization of RHCCD at Foothill Boulevard, the intersection could be retained as a two -way stop. 3. Relocating the proposed RHCCD 'intersection 760 feet east of Grove Aver_xe (it is currently 360 faet east of Grove Avenue) will improve traffic flow or, Foothill BOGievarC. 4. The proposed new signal at RHCCD and Foothill Boulevard could act m a "meter" for limiting traffic onto northbound RHCCD, while this would not prevent commuter use, it would severely limit such use and act as a deterrent to r_atinued future increases. - 5. The right -of -way acquisition required is limited to one parcel, the least of any alternative under consideration. ANALYSIS OF RAISED N1 DTI TAN (ALTERNATIVES 5 and 6) Alternatives 5 and 6 would construct a raised median in Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and San Berntrdino Road as illustrated in Figures 6 and 7. No median openings would be provided except at time intersections of Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. The only difference in Alterative 5 and 6 is that the intersection of RHCCD is maintained in its prey nt location (Alternative 5), rather than being relocated 400 feet easterly as proposed in Alternative 4. Field investigation discloses 16 driveways presently exist on RHCCD between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road which would be effected by these alternatives. Left -turn access to /from these driveways, which is currently permitted, would be eliminated through construction of the raised median. These 16 driveways would, in effect, accommodate right- turn -only vehicular movements. Peak period counts of the left -turn volume in /out of these 16 driveways disclosed that relatively little left turning presently occurs. A total of approximately 25 left - turns (total in and out) mostly occurring at the driveways in the vicinity of the Texaco station U- KI FU W7 Original Poor Quality ca JJ vm AJ Sa tu cc ail I o I Vzz- -,a Ali us S4 gum X 7AV RACM T ca JJ vm AJ Sa tu cc ail I o I A c ► Yl m VJ�VJ. lit a 00 �9 ak- ow a z4 me Lu 4 + tij i QD Yg q w i '—, and Magic Lamp restaurant were observed. In addition, a major concef.tration c' eastbound left-turns (over 200 per flour) occur at RHCCD. Construction of the raised median would cause these 25 left -turns to become U -turns at the intersections of Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. however, other .than the inconvenience created for access to /fro, busl:tesses by having to make U -turns at either of the two signalized intersections, the nominal increase in ILI -turns is tot expected to significantly effect the Ievel of service, however, the diversL)n of over 200 left -turns p.:r hour presently turning left from eastbound Foothill Boulevard onto northbound RHCCD caused by the construction of a raised median is anticipated to create some significant concetas. For example, the 200 left turners consist of both residents of the Red Hill area, as well as commuters using RHCC:D[Alta (.`, asta. Drive as a "shortcut" between Foothill Boulevard and Base Lire Road. Residents will be diverted east along Foothill Boulevard to Carnelian Street (Vineyarh Avenue) or to the Sycamore Inn where they will use the existing private road to RHCCD. Commuters may be diverted to either of these two routes or they may 0 -ige their travel patterns entirely and use Campus Avenue to avoid the Red 'hill area altogether. It is difficult to estimate with any precision the exact number of commuters and residents that will take the various routes. However, with over 200 left -turns per hour diverted from R11CCD, it is reasonable to forecast that a number of them (perhaps as many as SO per hour) will turn left into the Sycamore Inn's parking lot and rse the existing private road for access to RHCCD. Although it is acknowledged that this volume is merely an estimate and not one which is to be regarded with a high degree of confiOmce, it does, nevertheless, indicate a potentially serious threat to this private parking lot. In addition, some residents may choose to make a U -turn at the Sycamore Inn and " oacktrack" to RHCCD, rather than drive through the Sycamore Inn paring lot. It seems doubtful that any commuters would backtrack in such a manner. They are more likely to use the Sycamore Inn and private road, or proceed on east to Carnelian Street. In Order to prevent the Sycamore Inn parking lot and. adjacent private road from becoming a "thra street", it may be necessary to construct some sort of gate across the private road. Finally, even if the Sycamore Ina parking lot can be protected against becoming a by -pass route for RHCCD, the segment of RHCCD wYlch intersects Carnelian Street will experience a significant increase in traffic as residents themselves are forced to use this entrance instead of Foothill Boulevard. In summary, both Alternatives 3 aid 6 are expected to create inconvenience for commercial properties fronting on Foothiia Boulevard between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino k5 t1�! Road as 16 existing full access driveways are restricted to ri,,:,t- turn -on;y movements by construction of a raised median. However, the relatively minor numt.er of left -turns into /out of these driveways (i.e., less than ::.'� per hour) are nct expected to cause a capacity problem at Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road where a like number of U -turns will take place. Closure of the • left -turn access of RHCCD and Foothill Boule�rd is expected to create potentially significant pacts as traffic diverts through the sycamore Inn's parking Ioi and/or increases substant %,Il7 the existing traffic on the segment of MCCD west Carnelian Street. Alternative 5 has one other pot- ntially significant traffic impa The present intersection of RHCCD and Foothill Boulevard is located less than 300 feet east of Grove Avenue, Westbound traffic is estimated to backup 9 t„ 10 lengths (2S0 feet) during th-, peak hours, thereby, virtually blocking the present RHCCD intersection. Right tn:a:.:g traffic exiting this intersection would encounter significant difficulty entering the v;�wbound flow and find it virtually impossible to weave across three thra lanes to enter the westbound left -tur;r pocket at Grove Avenue. Relocation of the RHCCD to a point 400 feet easterly (as shown in Alt; rnative 4) would eliminate this weaving situation. A.ternative 5 and 6 each raise one additional concern regardir-s circulation -- i.e., that of access for emergency vehicles to RHCCD from eastbound oi. Foothill Boulevard. Since the fire department uses the left -turd lane at RHCCD for emergency access, it would be necessary to provide a break in th,� median for use by emergency vehicles csly. This could presumably include police and ambulance, as well as fire vehicles. This median opening would be signed for uw by emergency vehicles only. However, continual police enforcement would - )ably be II required r) prevent iz use by others. 1 Alternatives 5 and 6 both offer similar advantages and disadvantages, and these are summarized belov.- Advantages (both Alternatives) 1. A substantial Yeduction in traffic is created on RHCCD, particularly the southerly segment. ?. The cost of Alternative S is the lowest cost alternative. I Congestion at the RHCCD/Foothill Boulevard intersection is pre „icaily eliminated except for Alternative 5 where severe difficulty would be encountered in tale weavit.g maneuver between RHCCD and Grove Avenue. 16 i 1,Jg Disadvantages (both AIternatives) 1. Residents are re- diverted to use the Carnelian Street entrance, thereby significaaiy increasing traffic or, th .1t segment, as well as creating substantial out -of- direction travel for residents. 2. Sycamore Inn's parkiVg lot and the existing private road connection to RHCCD is expected to become a substitute by -pass route as residents and commuters alike divert to alternate routes. 3. A unique specially destined median open would be necessary at RHC D for use by emergency vehicles with periodic and continual law enforcement appL d to ensure it was not used by residents and commuters. 4. Considerable inconvenience and circuitous travel would be encountered in accessing 16 existing commercial driveways located on woothill Boulevard as these driveways were converted from what is currently, in eff .ct, full access to right -turn- only. SIMULATED TRAFFIC FLOW ANAL'c Uj In addition to a geometric evaWation of relocating the .intersection of RHCCD w'.h Foothill Boulevard, an analysis of the impact on existing traffic flow w indiric.,s was condu, ,ed. To assist in this analysis, a computer traffic flow simulatica program TRANSXT -7F, was utilized. Bxistin6 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes were utilized for analytical purposes. The existing five- phase signal operations on Foothill Boulevard at Grove: Avenue and at San Bernardino Road were retained. A new two -phase signal (Le., no separa ) left -turn arrows onto RHCCD) was analyzed at a location midwa,f between the Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road intersections. The resaits of this analysis are presented in the following table. Additional interpretation of the results indicate that in order to provide satisfactory level of servicti in the PM „.A, hour, three (3) eastbound travel lanes are necessary. In addition, unless a separate left -turn phase is provided for eastbound Foothill Boulevard to northbound Red Hill Country Club Road, the existing peak hour demand of 208 VPH will be limitad to a maximum of about 160 iFft- turns per hosr. This will effectively function as a "meter” restricting the number of commuters using RHCCD /Alta Luasta Drive as a by -pass routing between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Avenue. t Further review of the computer flow simulation reveals that tt*R maximum queue length of t traffic backed up on Foothill Boulevard behind the signal at Grove Avenue will be t2 to 16 {4:' cars for eastbound traffic. 'his situation will occur during the PM peak hour. The maximum } �j I7 tI ---39, M, degr -t of saturation flow on Foothill Boulevard will be 73 percent of capacity indicating a level vice "C" can be achieved. Analysis of a four -lane cross section on Foothill Boulevard indicates that during the ?M Ueak hour a maximum saturation flow rate of 114 perceait of capacity will occur at Foothill Boulevard at RHCCD indicating an unacceptable overcapacity condition will exist. To mitigate this condition, either the signal at RHCCD must be eliminated, or a third eastbound "thrr" lave must be provided. It is recommended that Foothill Boulevard be restriped to provide six (6) travel It,nes in the segment between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. The following Table 2 indicates the standard Measures Of performance Evaluation (MOEs) produced by TRANSYT -7F for 90 and- 100 second cycx lengths with both two and three eastbound travel lanes. As indicated; a 90- second cycle length without double- cycling the new two -phase signal at RHCCD prc�. ',uces the best results (i.e., average intersection delay of 21 seconds per vehicle). Although a 90- second cycle is about the maximum reasonable length for a two -ph..e intersection, very little pedestrian traffic is 2nticipated, and pedestrian violation of the long cycle is not anticipated. This long cycle does provide the deterrent for use of RHCCD by commuters. ANALYSIS OF lZXTST, !NQj jLFRSECTTON LOCH I TdN Otte of the questions which determines whether or not signaliaation of the existing intersection of Foothill Boulevard and RHCCD is feasible is the nee: for "back -to -back" left - tt.rn storage between the two locations. A tuod rule of thumb i�f estimating the Icft -turn storage requirement at a signalized intersection says to provide "one -foot of left -turn storag,+ for each peak hour left -turn vehicle plus 25 feet" The source of this guideline is recommended practice published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Examination of Figure 2 indicates a peak hour volume of 108 westbound left -turns on Foothill Boulevard at Grove Avenue and 208 left -turns per hour on eastbound Foothill Boulevard at RHCCD. In order to prm ie adequate left -turn storage on Foothill Boulevard, a minimum of separation of 556 feet between intersections io required. The existing spacing is less than 460 feet A computer simulation analysis of traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard (assuming a new v signal were to be installed at the present location of R'3CCD) indicates that eastbound left -turn traffic would continuously exceed capacity and back out of the left -turn pocket blocking the 113 �A <qo ,nRna,. r,r xnny ra,a ttcau4ro STREET: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD „ROVE AVENUE TO SAN 86RUARDINO ROAD) F CONDITIONS: RHCCD relocated to midway between Glove Avenue and son Sernerdino, and signalized xith two-phase signal. Assume six lanes an Fcothill Boulevard. NO. of AVG. TOTAL PERFOM SAT. 119 DELAY STOPS SNdEH AN PEAK HOUR basic OPT (93") 0 M03 3,287.0 57.61 Node 2 081- CYC (160" cycle) 0 20.61 3,910,4 62.74 Basic OPT wl3T ES (9n ") 0 19.70 3,271,3 56.88 Node 2 DBL CYC w/3T ES (100=') 0 20.41 3,2197,3 62.30 PM PEAK HOUR Basic OPT (90 ") 1 37.44 6,295.7 139.55 Node 2 DBL CYC (100W cycle) 2 70.84 6,585.6 227.07 111' Bas'cOPT w /3T ES (9011) 0 23.15 5,$90,4 95,68 Node 2 DBL CYC w /3T E9 1 29.92 6,193.0 119.52' 1 e eastbound inside thru -lane. The traffic model predict 11 eastbound left -turn vehicles would need to be stored at RHCCD during each cycle. This demand represent approximately 242 feet of storage required which compares well with ITE's general guideline which equates to 233 feet of left -turn storage in this case. The computerized signal simulation - ; -ialysis for traffic flow along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue . S RHCCD presumed a 100 second cycle length. If longer cycle length were necessary, on the order of 110 or 120 seconds, to satisfy future traffic increases along Footnill Boulevard then the inadequacy of existing left -turn storage for eastbound ''oothill Boulevard of RHCCD would be further exacerbated. As the cycle length increases so too does the left -turn storage requirement. Consequently, rather than having to store 11 vehicles per cycle (for 100- second cycle length) the minimum storage would be increased to 12 to 14 vehicles per cycle. If such long cycle lengths were to become necessary then it is anticipated that during peak peri,.d the eastbound left -turn queue at RHCCD could back up into and block Grove Avenue. - The conclusion of this analysis as that insufficient separation currently exist on Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and RHCCD to permit signalization of RHCCD. If such were to be done, the inside eastbound thru -lane would be continually blocked during the peak period by eastbound left -turn traffic wair;ng to turn onto RHCCD from Foothill Boulevard. PRO141BITION OF LEFT -T RNS AT REB HILL COUNTRY CLLIB DRIVE The need for continued left -turn capability f,om Foothill Boulevard to RHCCD was investigated. Existing traffic counts show 78 VPH and 208 VPH turn onto northbound RHCCD from eastbound Foothill Boulevard in the AM and PM peak hour., respectively. This by way of contrast only 7 and 12 VPH turn right onto RHCCD during the a.,me periods. Examination of this fact combined with review of overall access to the RHCCD residential area suggests that eastbound left -turn access is used both by resident as well as a commuter by -pass route. If this left -turn is eliminated altogether then resident of the area whc use this access are going to be significantly inconvenienced as they have to travel all the way around the neigilborhood to Carnelian Street and RHCCD /Camino Predera for acres:=. These same residents will snake a U -turn at the first opportunity (such as the San Be nardino Road signal) or Avill use other residential street, such as Camino Predera, increasing traffic there and simply shifting the problem to another street. Furthermore, failure to provide for eastbound teft -turns on Foothill Boulevard at RHCCD would not tignificuntly effect the southbound commuter traffic. 20 �1-41Z To address the "cnmmuter" issue on RHCCD, it appears that a better strategy to continue to allow eastbound left- turns at RHCCD and Foothill Boulevard, but to restrict the number that can enter by installing a signal and timing that signal to act 2 a "meter." This would have the effect of it crezing the tr vel time for the commuters ,sing the RHCCD by -pass causing some of theta to continue east on Foothill Boulew43 !;, Carnelian Street. Residents of the area would still be able to enter via RHCCD perhaps encountering a little more delay than at present, but without having to drive all the way around to the entrance on Carnelian Street or encounter a U -turn situation at the first available median opening on Foothill Boulevard. Although the recommendation is to provide full access at the new relocated RHCCD /Foothill Boulevard intersection ail option exists to provide only a westbound left -turn into the Magic Lamp Restaurant parking lot. If this option were to be selected, presumably in an effort to reduce commuter use of RHCCD, hen it is recommended that a westbound left - turn lane should be constructed to pr: Yde access to the restaurant parking lot. However, signalization of the intersection woulu not be necessary nor, in fact, even would it meet minimum signal warrants. The volume of traffic exiting RHCCD turning left onto eastbound Foothill Boulevard is less than 10 VPH in the peak hour and such a volume does not justify installation of a signal. SUM1I1VVA2Y AND RECOMMENDATION investigation of the feasibility of relocating the intersection of RHCCD /Foothill Boulevard indicates not only that such is possible, but highly desirable since it will not only improve the traffic flow conditions on Foothill Boulevard, but provide a small but significant deterrent to continued commuter traffic use of the RHCCD /Alta. Cuesta Drive "short cut" through the RHCCD residential area. Of six alternatives investigated, Alternative 4, realigning RHCCD through a vacant lot 400 feet e=st of I -5 present intersection with Foothill Boulevard, clearly emerges as superior to the oth--rs in nearly every respect. Three of the aiterna,,.ives involve limited sight distance which, unless vastly improved, would itself render these alternatives unfeasible. Ever, if this restriction could be solved, and, though substantial regrading to the Red Hill would be possible, the remaining advantages of the recommended alternative far exceed those of the other candidates, Two of the alternatives (5 and 5) involve potential use of the Sycamore Inn's parking lot as a substitute by -pass routing and a substantial diversion of residents own travel patterns. As a result, it is recommended that the city pursue a acquisition of a vacant parcel of land on the north side of Foothill Boulevard 400 feet east of.. 21�- I RHCCD for the purpose of relocating /realigning RHCCD and signalization of a new intersection located midway between two existing signals rt Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. It is further recorr;mended that full` left -turn access be provided at the new RHCCD /Foothill BoulevarA intersection and that this local, n be signalized and timed to discourage commuter us• while at the same time permuting motorists to enter albeit encountering somewhat more delay than is currently experienced. LI 22 "— 4� RESOLUTION NO„ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOWIENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -02, REQUESTING TO CHANGE: THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, AS SHOWN IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN, BY THE REALIGNMENT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB CRIVE TO APPROXIMATELY 400 FeET EAST OF THE PRESENT INTERSECTION !!ITH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BASED UPON AN IN- DEPTH" ENGINEERING STUDY. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No, 89 -02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment V;` referred to as "the application ". M On February B, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) On April 12, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted another duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iv)' All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, TH'REFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A ", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearings on February 8, 1989, and April 12, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The existing skewed intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an existing traffic signal at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close intersection spacing and skewed alignment creates operational difficulties with traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard. The preferred realignment as shown in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is not feasible. A feasible PLANNING COWISSIOH RESOLUTION NO. FSP 89 -02 - V TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 12, Z9b: PAGE 2 realignment has been determined by an in -depth traffic engineering sbidy. The proposed plan is to realign Red Hill Country Club Drive to approximately Op0 feet east of its present intersection at Foothill Boulevard, b) The property on the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Red Hill Country Club Drive east to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned special commercial. The property on the south side of Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road is zoned spe;ial commercial and from *,an Bernardino Read to the Sout,4rn Pacific railroad cross, g is zoned cormmunity commercial. North and south of these commercial zones are residential areas. c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plai. and will provide for development, Within the district, in a manger consistent with the General Plan and with related davelopment; and d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the AML Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and e) This amendment would not be materially injur'- ;s or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would n have a significant impact on the environment nor the su,rounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as folicvs a) The amendment c. 3 not conflict with the Circulation policies Of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and b) The amendment promotes tip= goals of the Circulation Element of the Foothill Boulevard' Specific Plan; and c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General plan; and d) The amendment would not be materially in;;urious or detrimental to the adjacent properties, I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. FSP 89 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMGNGA APRIL 12, 1909 is PAGE 3 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act or IWO and further this Commission recommends the issuance of ajiegative Declaration by the City Council. 5. Based upon the findings and C:nclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amerdm nt No. 80 -C2 on the- 12th day of April, 1989. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 1989, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMORGA BY: Larry _. I army T— T+.'c�di� , Chairman ATTEST: Brad u er, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City. of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted hj the Priming Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regul --r meeting of tae Planning Commis on held on the 12th day of April, 1989, by the following dote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: LEA 7.1.2 Access Control Program Business cont`^iuous to Foothill Boulevard currently realsae no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls,' consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts. and their location from 'on another; -including the provision of reciprocal.. access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and 'right -out islands) is�.gecessar -e clue to the —following"s • Increased vehicular traffic capacity; • Increased perception of safety; • Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and • Reduced vehicle/ pedestrian conflict points. DELETE 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment urrently, ed Hill in ,sects Foo is 13oulevar at an awk rd angle, ue tc this e ting confi ration, Re Hill will be r igned in der, to pro to an eff' tent and a transitio to Foothill u ievard . A prefer d alignme was 'select the fallowi the cons i ration of o er alig ent scenar' s. The s'e ted all merit is s wn an this a4e. DAM J rstw� r +t�+r � - �f —� + ea,lignme CIRCULATION CONCEPT 11-7.8 Exhibit A 7.1.2 Access Control Prooram n 1' usiness contio —us to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con - flictinc access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased sW2 fric- tion. A recommended proaram :of access controls, consistent with current city access policies reaulating access point, driveway cuts, anrl their location from.on another; including ^he provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right - in, and riaht -out islands) is necessary due to the following: Increased vehicular traffic - capacity; Increased perception of safety; Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and Reduced vehicle /pedestrian conflict points. 8, 7.1 .3 Red Hill Rea[ionment The existing skewed angle inta.- section of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an existing tra- ffic signal at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close inter- section spacing and skewed align- ment creates :operational difficul- tiea Mlth traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard. The preferred :,ealignment as shown in the Fcz�;hill Boulevard Specific Plan is not feaoible. A feasible realignl7ent has been de- termined by an in -depth traffic engineering study. The proposed Plan in to realign Red Hill Country Club Drive to approximately 400 feet east of ',tx present intersec- tion at Foothill Boulevard, provide a median break, and install a two - phase traffic signal (no left turn arrows). The recommended alignment is shown an this page. I ± ALT 4 t RECOMMENDED ALIGNMENT ate PIN CIRCUL -.T IC�1 CONC- ?T Exhibit B fI -;,3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOL)ITION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMiENDMEtX 09 -02, REQUESTING TO COANGE THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, AS SHOW IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN, qY CONSTRUQING A RAISED MEDIAN IN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AUD SAN SERNARDINO ROAD WITH RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE REMAINING AT ITS PRESENT LOCATION A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89 -02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On February 8, 1985, the Planning Commission oc the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) On April 12, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted another duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part W, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearings on February 8, 1989, and April 12, 1989, including written and oral staff reports., together !pith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The commuttz traffic on Alta Cuesta and Red Hill Country Club Drive is a substantial disturbance to the Red Hill neighborhood. It is recomrsended that a raised median be constructed in Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road to substantially reduce the commute traffic by eliminating left turns onto and Sion, Red Hill f,ountry Club Drive. 5b PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION W1. FSP 89.02 - CIV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL. 12, 1989 PAGE 2 b) The property on the north side of Foothill Boulevard from fled. Hill Country Club Drive east to the Southern Pacific raiir3aa crossing is zoned special coomercial. The property on the south side of r;othill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San lernardino Road is zoned special commercial and from San Bernardino Road to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned community commercial. North and south of these cowzrcial zones are residential areas. c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Pal -flies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related drielopment; and d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; ,nd e) This amendment would not be materially injupious or detrimental to the adjacent properties aed would not have a significant impact on the environment for the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial` ;uidene presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 2 and 2 above, this Commission �ereby finds and concludes as follows: a) The amendment does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the Foothill Coulevard Specific Plano and b) The armnds -nt promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance th the General Plan; and d) The a - ndment would not be materially i�ijurious or detrimantal to the adjacent properties. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviamd and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and further this Commission recommends the issuance e? u Negative Declaration by the City Council, 11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, FSP 39 -02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 12, 1989 PAGE 3 S. Based upon the fineings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ;ucamonga hereby recommends approval of the Fr.�thi°rl Boulevard Specific Plan Amendme— No. 89 -02 on the 12th aay of April, 1989. 6. The Deputy Secretary to th,s Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAND 'I CUCAI.ONGA BY: arr�+. e a� nicn AT TEST: °Rra u er, -S ec —re tary i' 1, Brad Buller, Secretary , the Planning., romnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certli,, that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly .introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the f City of Rancho Cucamonga, r* a regular meting of the Planting Commission held or ..:. *2th day of April, 1989, t, the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COWISSIONERS: ABSENT: COKMISSIONERS: i C) Access Control Program Business contiguous to Foothill. Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con - flitting access points which disrupt traf- fic fioN - by causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of access controls,' consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, drivewz-+ cuts, and their location from on another; 1.ic!uding the provision of reciprocal „act ;ess agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and 'right-out islands) is_necessary dale to the .following: _0 Increased iehicu:ar• traffic capacity; • Increased perception of safety; • Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and • Reduced vehicle /p ,,destrian conflict point_.. g. r s DELETE 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment urgently, ed Hill in sects Foot u Bouievar at an awls rd angle. ue to this a ting confi ration, Re Hill will be r igned in der to pro to an zff' lent ands a transitio to Foothill • ulevard. -1 A prefer d alignme was 'select the f, Ic the consi ; ration of o er clig ant scenar S. The se ted all ..Went is sF7n on this agr I Redhil aalignme CIRCULATION CCNCg ?T 11-7.8 .- Exhibit A 7.1.2 Access Control Proaram Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In acKtion, existing fragmented parcel conficuradonz promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic fiow by causing increased side fric- tion. A reca;amended proaram pf access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from .on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right -out islands) is necessary due to the foilov.inc. o increased vehicular traffic capacitN�, o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict porntz; and o Reduced vehicle / pedestrian conflict points. ALT S Q ADD 7.'4'.3 e Rea Hill Reatianment The commute traffic on Alta rues - to and Red Hill Country cub Drive Is a substant_al disturbance to the Red Hill neighborhood, It is recommended that a railved M.,dian be constructed in foothill 8culevard between Grove Avenue and San Be aardino Road in order to substta,tlally reduce the commuto traffic by eliminating left turns onto and from Red Hill Country Club Drive. The recommended alignment is shown on this page. 4 � CIRCU ATION CONC_p" Exhibit B, RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE Kf.,NING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENT ASSESSWEh7 AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -02, REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE RED FILL f:,3NTRY CLUB DRIVE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, AS SHOWN IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN, BY THE REALIGNMENT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE TO A "aROXIMATE0 400 FEET EAST OF THE PRESENT INTERSECTION' WITH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND CONSTRICTING A RAISED MEDIAN. IN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN Gt(OVE AVENUE AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, BASED UPON AN 1N -DEPTH ENGINEERING A. Recitals (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific plan Amendment No. 89 -02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the appUzation ". (ii) On February 8, 1989, the Pl,�riping Commission of the City of Ran5r Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) On April 12, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted another duly noticed public hearing on the application, (I v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth In the Recitals, Part "A ", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearings on February 8, 1989, and April 12, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a} The existing sktwed intersection of Red 'Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an existing traffic signal at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close intersection spacing and skewed aligrrent creates operational difficulties with traffic flow on Foothill 3oulevard. The commute traffic on Arita Cuesta and Red Bill PLARNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. FSP 89 -02 - Ci "N OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 12, 1989 PAGE 2 Country Club Drive is a substantial disturbance to the Red Hill Neighborhood, The preferred realignment as shown in the Foothill Boulevard. Specific Plan is not feasible. A feasible realignment has been determined by -an in -depth traffic engineering study. The proposed plan is to realign Red Hill Country Club Drive to approximately 400 feet east of its present intersection at Foothill Boulevard and to construct a raised median in Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and San Bernardinv Road, b) The property on the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Red Hill Country Club Drive east to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing iS zoned special commercial. The property on the south side of Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avert •e to San Bernardino Road is zoned special commercial and from San Bernardino Road to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned community c�vrmercial. North and south of these Commercial zones are residential areas. c) This amendment does not conflict with tale Land Use Policies of the General Plan and wil',' provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amr ndment does promate the goals and objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and e) This amendment would "at be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment ncr the surrounding properties. 3. BeAd upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of f-Rcts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) The amendment does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and b) The amendment prorates the goals of the Circulation Element of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance vith the General Plan; and PLANrrtNG C"ISSION RESOLUTION NO, FSP 89 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 12, 1989 s PAGE 3 d) The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and further this Commission recommends the .ss;iance of a Negative Declaration by the City Council S. Based upon the `indings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuca+nila hereby recommends approval of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amend*ant No. 89-02 on the 12th day of April, 1989. b. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to tha adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF rHE C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. re , a rman ATTE,S,T : Brad But er, secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of tt,e Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April, 1989, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COWISSIONERS: NOES: COWISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �7 to 7.1,2 Access Control Proqram Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promotal a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causin increased side fric- tion. A recommended program of 'access controls., consistent with ckrrent city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their loca`ion from 'on another; - including the provis ,n of reciprocal.. access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such', as right- in, and 'right -out islands) is: necessary due to thc.! —following:'. • Increased vehicular traffic capacity; • Increased perception of safety; • Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and • Reduced vehicle/ pedestrian conflict points. e C �n DELETE 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment urrently, ed Hill in sects Foo t, Boulevar at an awk rd angle, ue to this a sting confi ration, Re Hill will be r igned in der to pro to an eff' rent and s e transitio to Foothill A prefer d alignme was select the fallow; the consi ration of o er al'sg ent scenar' s. The se ted all ment is s wn on this age. I I . I <,'IN ! l U —I •--1 R., I ealignme I 1 1 I 1 -1 '1 CIRCULATION CONCisPT N -s� Exhibit A ADD 7.1.2 7.1.3 Access Control Proerarn Red Hill Realianment Business continuous to Foothill : oulevard currently rea6 a no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel conficurations prbmote a multiple of con- flicting ac -less points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program-.Of access controls. consistent with current city access policies reaOlating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from.on another,• InciOding the provision ,of reciprocal access 2greex,iAnts, and special vehicular access control,, such as right- in, and right -out islands) is necessary due to the following: • Increased vehicular traffic capacity; • Increased perception of safety; • Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points: and • Reduced vehicle/ pedestrian conflict pints. V ALT 6 0 ' The existing skewed angle inter seation of Red Hill. Country 'Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an existing tra- ffic signs;b at Grove Avenue. The combination pf this close intersec- tion spacing and skewed alignment creates operational difficulties' with traffic flow on Foothill Bou- levard. The commute traffic on Alta Cuesta and fled H`.11 Country Club Drive is a substantial dis- turbance to the Rkd Hill Neighbor- hood. The preferred realignment as shown in the Foothill Boulipnard Specific Plan is not feasible. A feasible realignment has baen de- termined by vh in -depth traffic engineering mt)idy. The proposed plan is to re-align Red Hill Country Club Drive to app:roximately 900 feet east of its present intersec- tion at Foothill boulevard and to construct a raised median in Foot- hill Boulevard he'tween Grove Avenue and Sar Bernardino Road. The reco- mmended alignment is shown mn this page. CIRCUL4,TION CONC PT Exhibit B �q Foothill Fire IPROT CTIION DISTRICT T P. O. BOX 35 • -21 AMETHYST ST. • RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 (714) 987 -2535 March 22, 1989 City of Rancho Cucamonga Mr.. Paul Rougeau Senior Civil Engineer P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Paul: k eel VZO jfit OrOF R 241,x89 rt4elp 0N�aO! 4ts It was brought to my attention that the City Council did not want to approve the consultants recommendation for the rz alignment ek Red Hill Country Club Drive without the construction of a median, which would prevent left hand turns from cast bound Foothill Boulevard onto Red Bill ;Country Club Drive. This r,-quest is unacceptable to the Fire District, due to the fact that we curren.iy have automatic aid fire units responding from Upland to the Red Hill area that would be unable to turn left into that aren. The emergency unit would h„ve to then travel to Vineyard Avenue, then north to Red Hill Country Club Drive and back to the site of the emergency. That is the long way around, especially it the destination was the Country Club itself. It should be noted that not only would this proposed arrangement be a deterrent to fire apparatus, but also to police and ambulance vehicles needing quick access to that area. If it would help, the fire district will offer its assistance to you regarding emergency egress as you pursue an alternate to the recommended access. Sincere y, Lloyd B. Almand Division Chief/Fire Marshal LBA /ss ADMINISTRATION Frank A. Cosca, )c Ed.D. Central School District IngrctS Vogel Ingrid Vogel 9457 Foothill Blvd. J Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 / (714} 989 -8541 Assistant Superintendent, Business Services April 11, 1989 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division.'% 1 9340 Base Line Road, Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Re: Environmental Assessment and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 89 -02 - City of Rancho Cucamonga Central School District staff have consieered the City's proposed realignment of the north leg of Red Hill Country Club Drive by including a raised, curbed median on Foothill Boulevard in order-to eliminate left turns into and out of Red Hill Country club Drive. This prof MA1 presents the following concerns to Central School District -- in partitUli�r, to our Transportation Department. 1. District buses use the eastbound access into Red Hill Country Club Drive from Foothill. Boulevard continually during the day. 2. Using the vineyard Avenue access to Red Hill Country Club Drive would result in delays to our busing schedule and exposure to increased tz -ffic. 3. Drivers and childr 1 would be exposed to increased risk of irlury due to the number c9 acc:lents that occur at the ViaayarC Avenue intersection, in spite of c:he traffic signal. Central School District respectfully requests that the City not eliminate the left turn access int. Red Bill Country Club Drive from Foothill Boulevard. Thank you for your �consideratid. Erwin N. Jones Superintendent sp --*' // BOARD OF TRUSTEES Henry L Stoy Antonia L Rogo-s Drbbic Baker ProWont t'lerk Jteme er RECEIVED APR 111989 CITY OF RANCHO CUCASlUND ENGINEERING DIVISION Ruth A. Musser Andrew Taylor Vemmber Member CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMUNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 12, 1939 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRuM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Betty Miller, 4ssistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A!a'D TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11473 - LACY - A subdivision of acres of an into : parcels in the Low Residential Development District (2 -4 DU /AC), located on the south side of Hamilton Street, east of Hermosa Avenue (APN 202- 201 -73) I. PROJ.CT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Actinn Requested: Ap shown on Exhibit ''C " proval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as . B. Parcel `ize: Parcel 1 - 12,OOJ sq. ft. (0.28 ac.) Parcel 2 - 12,200 sq. ft. (0.28 ac.) Parcel 3 - ; ?,600 sq. ft. (0.29 ac.) Parcel 4 - t.+,000 sq. ft. (0.30 ac.) Tatal T.75 ac. C. Existing Zoning: Low Residential D. Surrounding Land Use: North - Vacant and Single Family (Historical) South - Single Family East - Single Family (test - Dee, Canyon Elementary School E. Surro ,,,nding 3eneral Plan and Development Code Designations: North - Low Residential South Low Residential East Low ':, esidential Wint - Low Residential F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes to the southeast at 3 percent. ITEM PLANNING CZ4MISS10N STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11473 LACY APRIL 12, 1989 PAGE 2 II. ANALYSIS: The subdivision of the property is rather straight forward and co.isistent with, surrounding development (Exhibit B). .:jwever, the grading of the parcels required some investigation. Three ait:,.nate methods (if grading the parcels were evaluated: 1. Raising the entire parcel to drain to Hamilton Street; 2. Raising the house pad portion of the parcel to drain to Hamilton Street, with the rear yard draining south, through private easements, to Mignonette Street; and 3. Maintaining as close to the current elevation as possible, with the entire parcel draining to the south. The conditions of approval require alternative number 3 because it will have the least impact on properties to the south, in terms of elevation differences. The conditions also require that all the parcels be graded, the required drainage sys.:zm installed, and erosion protection, provided prior to recordation of the Final Parcel Map. This will ;educe the potential complications that could arise if each parcel was graded individually. III, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Stu . Staff con acted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Hew paper. Posting at the site has also been completed. Y. RECOMMENDATION: it is rrcon ended that thn Punning Commnissi, consider all Input a�� elements of the Tentative Parcel Nap 11473. If niter such consideration, the Cornission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer 'RH: BM: ly 4ttachments: vicinity f,_a (Exhibit "A ") Local Area Map (Exhibit "B ") Tentative Map (Exhibit "C ") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval E GP *rr- CITY OF RCE1l 1''tAP i i 4 3� IS RRANC30 CUCAMONGA TrML.-V1C-1 N 1 T Y MAP W WEEM- G `) ON M. % %-R #1 _ �i l ]>e.e P CANY 4 La mF- -N *Mlky Se-WO OL . C;Ty OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I 9 11 . L MAP 1191 S. _� Na9M/GTON R ti a 1•+u Etta I `•EUdl ItOI! K771 �. � '` r35 � i rES i lrSl I /d d0 a4m f r 13,0001 G• PRwgATe -,- t4n 1 EAZI ez idGF A 1 �\-o-n. �1 E'.uSf /roG CUP8 E cC/fr6R `•- EXIST /h. ^. SrG�Ht44.v' t d 1 i iefrJl Ctl ( CITY 0.01, RANCHO CUCAMONGA `•EUdl ItOI! K771 �. � '` r35 � i rES i lrSl I I I AAP OV44 re FAO .f!lt6aT /OMJ ) R, G• PRwgATe -,- t4n 1 EAZI ez idGF 1 �\-o-n. �1 � . MiGIIJOti,'ETTE _��I�— 3YREET E0 90 ( CITY 0.01, RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLUTIO' NO. A P.ESOLU!'ION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11473, LOCATED ON THE SOU 11 SIDE OF HAMILTON STRECT :AST OF HERMOSA AVENUE, AND WING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN 202- 201 -73 WHEREAS, Tentative Pcrcel Map Number 11473, submitted by Otis Lacy and Company, applicant, for the purpose 4f subdividing into 4 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rcncho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State Of California, identified as APN (s) 202- 201 -.73, located on the south side of Hamilton Street east of Hermosa AveruA and WHEREAS, on April 12, 1989, the Planninul LaMiss on held a dull advertised public hearittg for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE ; -ANCHO tUCAMNGA PLANNING CORMISSION RESGLVEi AS SECTION It That the followf.19 findings have been made: I. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. WM 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivi-, -- is Consistent with the General Plan. 3. Thlc; the site is physically suitab- �. the proposes; developmmnt. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improverents will nat cause ruostantial environmental damage, pubjac health problems or have adverse affects on abutting Property. SECTION 2r This Commission A.;.,ds and certif',as that the project has az,�n rev i s"oe ano considered in cc��tiancs With the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 yid, further, this Comn ission hereby issucs a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: 1nat v,.,tative Parcel Map No. 134,73 is hereb• approved subject lro V- ee `�;tached Standard Conditions and the tlollowinq Special Conditions: Ipecial Con ,,tions 1. All four a - yraded to drain to the easement along tale south property I' itr Arid 3, and the private drainage system shall be installed as +e Building and Safety Division, prior to recordation of the r t Map, 2. lifter grading, provide AsyOn protection through hydroseeding or o soil birder. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. i TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP 11473 - 1,ACY APRIL 12, 1989 PAGE 2 W APPROVED AWD ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 1939. PIANNI s CtWISSION OF THE CITY OF RAVCHO CUCAMONGti BY: i ATTEST: --Sead Buller, Secretaf` I, Brad Buller, Secretary n' the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, '1a ^;reby certit„ that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly 'ntrowced, pasted,-,nd adopter by t?e Planning Cornissica of the Cif of Ranchr, rucamonga, at a regular meeting of the P1arnirg Commission held on t1.e 12th day of April, 1)89, by the follovIng vote-to-wit: AYES: CCM9ISSIGNERS: 'iOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: CX34ISSIONERS: E IE g T Y o' Q Q e F Y wi �M A u ypK{ W 'Y Orig -w,", e uor Quality Mw �CC �� 'C� .CCU OCCV I.f C n N ^� VMY we 6N cO p`,yG YM vra i s o 8 ^a Z 10 Lil � Yp, O• w p aalYCyyc r ��YYYy.6 � �v pMpO y^ n v N C Y 6 MP CV •� Y C ��u•$ Y w IIi w� 31 U C A � "a - �a YsYsad s o 8 pp Is P- Rp 4N C q Y 8 ' ry A ! +ti JI` E� uy. a � r •. � ''s leg : $u oY.j� ;d I �$ iii ■2 p ,� . � g$ .`mod' � i qV V ►GO � }~} � y MKy it" A SA ao hY$ 3� o A. 0444 C� • `Y V�d (IVY O�5wL+ HOC WV Lvp t'40N w4 b h i � .y } N 1 .l I t gg 4 Sls C 9 4 4 d L C G 4 Mr 22 ye i Mr o� u �$ AIX Na u�cy tlY@ Y 4iip g -1 oN, o N$ L 9 g g r06% 1 N tl% SEA 'S $i ($B.. Ord �1S Sy + n^ ib .i C L qb �y Y • dpp _`W �'wu M Slu u �n o" i u IL L p a■ ■n Y Y j� vo r vM y ^—.. L' V N'L Y QOM M � �p -$ GSM o C �^ qq es 92 N. 1 i wi ba S ^ qGV ¢�iyYipy., _Y aY ' yy {yy;{� 3 r N L � Y Y b •EQ� «`� v y i @ � N a� W {ppyy '�'S VV 6 L ! O N 61br L Q■ � 0 r�i. �p •~'. + x SEA i I l 1 all I , f r.-- -- CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 12, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner o cLCa�ra�� 01 lid l'k UPI l97r SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 8901 - SHELLY'S RESTAURANT - The review of prow ng ve entertainment in"can unu on with .t - estaurcint use, located at 8038 Haven Avenue, Suite E. I. ABSTRACT. In ;ompliance with City Council ordinance �No. 290) rega ril'in`g the regulation of entertsirnrent uses which require establishments that provide entertainment to obtain an entertainment permit, the applicant is requesting review and approval of an rntertalnment Permit for a live band within ineir bar. 11. ANALYSTS: Shelly's Rcs,,zurant is a full service restaurant and bar sery ng beer, wine and other aicoholic beverages. The current proposal is to provide entertainment on Friday evenings from 9:90 PM .to 1 :00 AM. The band wi it be located in the bar area, there will be no aftf,%sion charge, and no dancing will be per;aitted. A security guard is not required for establishments where no dancing is allowed. Mr. John Marquez is the Manager of Sieily's Restaurant and is responsible for the managemtcnt of the entertainment, to accordance with Section 5.12.040 of the Entertainment Ordinance, the applicant Ms indicated that neither the applicant nor any persons responsible for the management or supervision ai Shelly's Restaurart has, ,eithin the previous ton years, been convicted of a crime nor has the applicant ever had any permit or license issued in conjunction with the salo of alcohol or the provision of entertainment revoked at this establishment. Review of the Entertainment permit must take into conaideratiQn locationai impacts and what mitigation measures should be inc`o4ed in the Resolution of Approval. Shelly's Restaurant Me Exhibit "A ") is within the Virginia Dare Gents, which is a mixed -use complex, located adjacent to Haven Avenue. 'the nearest residential uses are over 1,2LO feet from the restaurant and do not constitute a significant factor. Shelly's Restaurant is a freestandit; building; hNever, it is bated within the Food Court. Restaurant and retail tenants occupy the remi, tying space ITEM PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT SP 89 -01 - SiELLY`S RESTAURANT April 12, 1989 Page 2 in the food Court tihicl surrounds a central plaza area with outdoor eating area:. The historic lanJmark gvape cruse, r museum building is attached to the south side of Shelly'_. Uses which could be negatively impacted by the propos.� entertainment are 0e adjacent restaurant, theater, office and retail uses. Negative lmacts could in:lude noise, parking, and disturbances. lte:'efore, a.cnndition has been included .+ithin the Resolution of Approval that should the oueration of this Entertainment Petnit caarL adverse impacts upon adjacent businesses or operations it shalt be brought before the Planning Commission for the considaraticn and possible suspension or revocation of t':e nermlt, in accordance with Section 5.12.100 of the Entertainma:tt Ordinance. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Cosrtttission must make the a ow ng n Legs in c.-der to approve Entertainment Permit No. 89 -01: A. The conduct of the astabi l • invent or the granting of the application woula nut be contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare. S. The premises or establishment ;s not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner. C. The-applicant or any other person associated with him as principal or par,nzr, or in a position or capacity involving partial or toW control over itee conduct 9? the buainee� for which such permit is sought to be i -,sued, has not been cowicted fit any court of competent jurisdiction of inv offense involving the presentation, exhibition or performan ^e of any obscene show of any kind, or of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude, nor has had any approval, peettiv or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertaiment revoked within the preceding five years. 0. that granting the application world not create a public nuisance. E. That the normal operation of the premises would net interfere w.:h tree peace and quiet of any surrounding residential neighborhood. F. The apslicant has not made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of material fact in tho required applications. Li PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EP 89 -01 - SHELLY'S RESTAURANT April 12, 1989 Page 3 To the best of Staff's knowledge, there is no infQination to indicate anything contrary to these findings. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recaamends that the Planning Commission con di U ona -r approve Entertainixeert Permit 89 -03 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfu *iy subpr�tted, Brad Sul erg city Planner 88:TG:sp Attachments: EYhiyit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Application Resolution of Approval �j ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT APPLICATION Applicants for entertainment permits shall complete the following questionaire: PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE A. The name and permanent address of applicant: s= �_ ftlgc 7. B. The name, proposed and current, if any, and business address of the applicant: Na ----------------- . ------------- -- ----------------- - - - - -- Business Address C. A detailed desrsiption of the proposed en`ertainmertf, including type of entertainment. and number of persons engagee hi the entertainment (may attach seperate sheets if necessary): _ —N/ -e- (S r U. The date or day-of-week, hours and location of entertainment (attach itoorplan), and the admission fee, if any, to be charged - -_ rzi n/4.( .-JiC�:kr'_5 !' f"' - -- N 0 e e J ta, C Ahn6G . ----------------- ----------- - - - - -- ------ ----------- - - - - -- E. The name(s) of The person(s) responsible -for the rnanagcnient or supervision of applicant's business and of any enter inment: Gt..t taac _. IKG.st• .... _.. F. A statement of the itature and civ;racter of Vpplicant`s business, if any, to be carried on in conjunction with. such ente�M Z, ..*.nt, in aim whether or not alcohol will be served c - part of such business. 'c1000fs /i'� 9 f�-C.c�TaGl't. 3Quen,ASrS, a-*'1, G. Whether or not the applicant of any person responsible foi, the management or supervision of applicant's business have been, within the previ%.ns teri, years, convicted of a vilme, the nature of such offense and the sent4mce receive '�° . �r including condition; of parole or probation, if any, H. Whether or not applicants has ever had any cermit or license issued ir. conjunction wiLh the sale of alcohol or provision of entertaiment revoked, including the date thereof and mrae of the revoking agency: N 0 Any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application shall be grounds for denial of the application for an entertainment pe, mit. �I Ell RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE ,ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPPO+IING EUTERTAINMENT PERMIT N0, 89 -01 TO OPERATE AND CONDUCT SITERTAINMENT BY PERFORMERS PLAYING MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LISTENING PLEASURE FOR SHELLY`S RESTAURANT, LOCATED AT 8038 HAVEN AVENUE, SUITE E, AND MAKiNG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. RECITALS M On f+[ay 21, 1986 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamong a ?Opted Ordinance lb. 290 providing for the regulation of entertaimnent. (11' On February 3, !989, john Marquez filed an applfi ation for the issuance of an Entertainment Permit (EP 89 -01) described above in the title of this resolution. (fli$I On the 12yh day of April, 1989, the Rarrzho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the abr e- described proiec'.. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Pl"ing Commission resolves is follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based u�w substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- refenwed April 12, 1988 hearing, including the written Staff report, and the written, signed and verified application of the applicant, this ConW ssion hereby specifically finds as follows, (a) The application applies to property located on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue on a lot presently improved with structures and parking areas which constitute the Virginia Dare Center; (b) The property to the north of the subject site is developed with a restaurant and retail uses, to the south are office uses, to the east is a restaurant use (under construction), and to the west is Edeards Theater and a vacant site; and (c) Shelly's Restaurant is a full service restaurant and bar serving beer, wine and otlo;:r alcoholic beverages. The proposal is to provide musical entertairvrent on Friday evenings from 9;00 PM to 1,00 AM. The band wail be located in the bar area, there will be no dmissiov: charge and no dancing will be perm tted. 7 PLANNING cOwInrON RESOLUTION NO. EP 89 -01 SHELLY'S RESTAURANT April 12, 1989 Page "? 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Cormission during the above- referenced April 12, 1989 public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set iijrth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Comission hereby finds and co -Dudes as follows: (;) That the vorduct of the establ i$hment or the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare; (b; That the premises or establishment are t.ot likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner; and (c) That the applicant has not had any approval, permit or license issfted in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years; and (d) Tha. granting the application would not create a public nuisance; afid (e) That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surroundirg commercial center; and (f) The applicarO has not trade any false, misleading or frauM ent statement of material fact in the req;fired application. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this C01,114ssion hereby approves the application subj ct to the following conditions; (a) This approval is for small bands playing musical instruments for if- tening pleasure only. No dancing is permitt Any chaiage �­r intensity of enV rtsinmR c shall tequiro application for modificatio of this permit. (b) If the operation of this Entertainment Permi.} ,auses adverse effects upon adjacent busihesscs or operations, the EntOrtainmert Permit shall be brought before the Planning Zomnission for the consideration and po+,sible suspension or revocation of the permit. (c) Hours cf operation shall be limited to Friday evenings from 9 :00 PM to 1 :00 AM. T' g PLANN?Nt CO MISYION RESOLUTION NO.. £P 89 -01 » SHELLY'S RESTAURANT April 12, 1987 Page 3 (d) Doors shall remain cloned on Friday evenings from 9 :00 PM to 1:00 AM when entertaitment is being conducted, For noise attenuation purposes. (e) Exteriur Noise levers small not exceed 66 dBA during the hours from 9:00 PM to 10:00 PM and 60 dBA during the hours from 10:04 PM to 1.00 P1.11. (f) Access to the lounge/entertainment area rust be from the main entrance to the primary use aid not from a sepirate exterior entrance. 'Me rear exit shall be for "Fire Exit Only ". APPROVED AMID ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I BY: Larry r. KCNiel, Chairman. ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller,, Secr &tart' of the Planning Cots .sion of the City- of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resilution was duly and regularly introduces Gassed, and adopted, by the Planz.09 Comomftsion of the City of Rancho Cucamc ja, at a re3ular maeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April, 1959, by the follocing vote to -wit: AYES: COMIC SSIONCRS: NOES: COMMISSI" il, : ABSENT: COMSSIOm0.S: : -cl �701-0 04-12 -89 PC Agenda O 4 of 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C�;CAnro AWh STAFF REPORT 4 � iGQ ';z DATE: April 12, I989 _ >> 29:7 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY; Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 1.55 acres of e eve oilmen s riots Mapuefrom o Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), located approximately 600 feet south of Lemon Avenue, 470 feet north of Highland Avenue an Vt east side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 201-2S2-41 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Undeveloped, Law - Medium Rot 'tit South - Existing Single Family, Lox -' A!,' dW0j ;residential East - Existing Single Family, Lc*'-!ied•:um Residential West - Existing Single Family, Lori �!esi ^jential B. General Plan Designations: Project Site -, Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) North - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) South - tow- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling un•1ts per acre) East - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling ul ±ts per acre) Nest - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling :snits per acre) C. Site Characteristics: The subject site is vacant and approx ma e y acres. Two mature windrows run the length of the property, east to west. There is an approved tract map to the north (at 5,4 dwelling units per acre) and an existing subdivision fat 7.8 dwelling units per acre) to "he south and east. Archibald provides street frontage to the immediate west. II. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS: On R�,ruary 1S, 1999, the City Council appeove enera lan Amendmesit 89 -01C, This General Plan Amendment was a measure first init7ated by the Planning Commission on December 28, 1988 to promote and provide consistency between ITEM x OLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: ENV. ASSESS. & DDA 89 -01 April 12, 1989 ?age 2 11 the General Plan Map and Development Districts EUr. From that process, one parcel still remained inconsistent )etween the two maps. 11ne purpose of this Development District ,amendment ;,� to follow -up General Pan Amendment 89 -01C and make the subject parcel consistent between the two maps. The proposed district amendtrv:nt is consistent with the recent General Plan Amendment of Low - Medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), as well as the surrounding existing and proposed residential land uses. III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Initial Study W reviewed a Envi ronmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts to OLCur as a result of the proposed Development District Ommendment. It is anticipated that any issue of vehicular impacts oey be successfully mitigated at the development project level. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS, Development District Amendment 89 -01 will not be 'detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause adverse environmental impacts. Should the Planning Commission determine that the amendment would promote the land use goals and purpose of the General Plan, the following findings must be made for approval: A. The subject property is suitable for the intended land use of this amendment. B. The intended land use is compatible with the surrounding areas in term(, of L-sess, vehicular /pedestrian circulation and tie intensity. This 'is evidenced by the similar land uses in the surroundinc properties. C. The proposed amendment does not have any adverse environmental impacts on the site or the surrounding areas that cannot be mitigated. D. This amendment is in conformance with the goals and objectives of the General Plan. V. CORRESPONDENCE: item has been advertised as a puhlic hearing in a ai i.y �e rrt newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recoo zsnds that the Planning Commission aclopt the-attached Resriu "ion recommending approval of Development District Amendment 0-01 to the City Council and recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration, thereby allowing the designation to be changed from "Medium Residential" (8 -14 dwelling unif.. per acre) to "Lora- Madium Residential" (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). K - __-, Ell LJ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: ENV. ASSESS. & ODA 89 -01 April 12, 1989 Page 3 Respectfully S"itted� Brad Bufler City Planner BB WG:%j Attachments: Exhibit "A1° - Development Districts Map Exhibit "B'" Development Distrricts /Goneral Plan Map. Exhibit "C" - January 25, 1989 Planning Commission Minutes Echibit "0" - February 15, 1989 City Council Minutes Resolution Recommending Approval N S~ �L L = LOW RESIDENTIAL 2 -4 DU PS PER ACRE NMH LM = LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL 4 -8 OU S PER ACRF- M = ii':,;M RESIDENTIAL E -14 DU`S PER ACRE - q j DEVE! QPMEtVT Dt5T8tCTS AMLNOMEMT 89.0 Trru. R—EVkL— o-7MENT' C0ISTIRICTS MAP EXHIErr- SCALE: tdONE 11 E L = LOW RESIDENTIAL 2.4 DU'S PER ACRE N LEA = LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL 4 -8 DU'S PER ACRE M = MEDRJM RESIDENTIAL ti -14 DU'S PER ACRE LM GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION F j� ITM, DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS AMENDMENT 89 -01 �`� f "''C •L j'jfUtDEVELOPMENT DOSTRICTSMENERAL Ok A,4 MAP N- AMING WrSU 1 EXHIMT- B SALE: !-ONE Mr. Nunez he wz continuance to Lr lqqq Motion: Moved by Toll Assessment and Tentative following vote: AYES: LAN NAMERM NOES: ISSIONERS M. :ENVIRO KT to continue Environmental 22, 1989. Motion carried by the i lrAnVnv ..bVLf7'IiYER7l9 - h 8- -4UCi4 W 6mcilu Q WUC{ VI W PnrcC15 jdPPrVAIl.MQWjY 10 acres oche General Plan land use mg fromYMediva Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), for those parcels located on the south side of Lemon extending approximately 1,100 feet east oof Arcteibaid Avenue and the parcel on the north side of Highland extend ;ng 780 Feet east of Archibald Avenue - APM: 201-,S2-01, 03, 04, 21, 22, 39, 40, 41, 42, and 43. Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner, )resented the staff report. Chairman Mc Niel opened the public hearing. Lawrence Gaiefsky, 6393 Jadeite Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, favored the Amendment. He felt lowering the density would help cut future traffic congestion. Scott Anderson, 9848 Liberty, Rnsyho Cucamonga, supported the change to Low - Medium. Hearing no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 89 -01C. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: C"ISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY - carried Planning Commission Minutes_ -12- January 25, 1989 El City Council Minutes February 15, 1989 Page 11 Aft and :john Potter, Hughes Deaelopcmnt, 2 Corporate Plaza, Newport , ported they have received approval #ram a real estate coawit f a r tenant for a drugstore and a grocery store. They a ad the c ty's support and •ncouragad Coupcil's support. David A a, confirmed that the proposal was approv supported by all the r nts. There being no furth-ftLesponse, the public hearing City Clerk Authalet read 4.title of OrdinancRAMP592. 392,jjVjW reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE OUNCIL OF THS C?'TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAi,I70 NO VICTORIA COMMUNITY FLAN AMENDMENT NO. 89- t1DING CTORIA COMMUNITY P?.XN LAND Uss HAP FROM =HIGH RE3IDXNT i4 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO RHOOD COMMERCIAL, 2.9 ACRES AT THE SO OF MILLIKEIL RND ;r AV11=3 AND NSIG D COMMERCIAL TO LOW- MEDIUMS IAL (4 -8 D , UNF.TS PER ACRE) FOR 9.3 ACRES AT TAE S T CORNER HILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND AVRMS, RANCHO NGA, IFOANIA, AND MAKING FINDIUCS IN SUPPORT TitERBor Moved by Brown, seconded by Alexandev :o approve Resolution waive full readina of 7rdinKnce No. 392 and ast naennd —, ES. ENVIROhjW L MENT 01C - TAT; CITY OF RMCHO CUGUJQ ea - A request to amend a total of 10 parcels (approximately 10 acres) of the General Plan land use map from Medium Residential (8.14 dwelling units per acre) to.Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units yer sore) those parcels located on the south side of Lemon extending approximately 1,100 feet east of Archibald Avenue and the parcel on the north side of Highland and extending 780 feet east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201- 2S2 -01, 03, 04, 21, 22, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 43. Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Senior Planner. Mayor Stout "nod the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Lawrence Gafski, 6393 Jadeite, stated he supported Resolution No. 89 -050 There being no further response, the public hearings was closed. 4`- City Council Minutes Fabruary is, 1989 Page 12 RESOLUTION NO. 89 -050 A RESOLUTION OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 89 -01C, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MZDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MZDXUH RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) THOSE: PARCELS LOCATED ON THE BOUTS SIDE OF LEMON EXTENDING aPPROXIHATELY 1,100 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND THE PARCEL ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SIGHLAND AND EXTENDING 780 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD, AND MP_TtIUG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Buquet, amconded by Alexander to approve Aecalution No. 89- 050. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. -LYON SWUM -.•Pi revision to land ua aA ately 130 acres of Phase One of the Village of Victoria Lakes s bean Base amine Road to the Werth, Millar Avenue to the south, the f r bound the VS4toria Planned Community to the east, and th horn Californi on corridor to that wsrtt A d carious amendments to use and circulation t .ect -as- built` a.;nditions within the Windrow eyards and Groves. Staff presented by Dan Coleman, Senior Plann After asking saveral tions regarding the water a omes to the mall, Mayor Stout suggested t hen we start formaliz regional, we take a look at the south side of ar to make sure th some logical or visual connection between the two, there is a distance from Hiller and where the formal fountain start ginal idea was that they were to be linked together. Councilwoman Brown asked Jerry Fu source Servi.:s■ Director, if the Landscape �.aintenance District i cria d be paying for the maintenance of this project. Jerry Fulwood, Resource ss Director, respon es. In addition, Counci Brown asked if staff had don alysis of the cost of the maintenanc hit I,- oject. Jerry FulwO0didW8ourc6 Servic*G Director, responded no. Dan Col Senior Planner, stated that the developer is to t these Qstim concurrent with the first tract submitted in this village. C waaan Brown further stated she was part of the sub - committee, ale th not 12 C w - o h r 11 .,y RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 89-01, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT'DISTRICTS_MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (6 14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRD TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDEf.rIAL (4 S DWEELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 1.65 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF LEMON AVENUE, 470 FEET NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAXING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR: 201 - 2522 -41 A. Rccitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Developsant District Amendment No. 89-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolutio% the suGject Development Dis t Amendment is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On April 12, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho 'ucamunga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determieed and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as foiiowsa 1. This Commission hereby specifically* finds that all of the facts set forth in Recitals, Part "A ", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on dpri3 12, 1989, including written and oral staff reportic, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to .approximatety 1,.65 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located approximately 600 feet south of Leman Avenue, 470 feet north of Highland Avenue on the east sic., of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently lesignated as Medium Residential; and a�. C1 PLANNINO COMMISSION RESOLUtION NO. RE: ENV. ASSESS. A DDA 89 -01 April 12, 198 ?' Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low - Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low Pesidential and is existing single family residential. The property Sp the east is designated Low - Medium Residential and is existing single fam ly residential. The property to the south 7s designated Low - Medium Residential and is existing single family residential.. (c) This amendment does not co�jflict wi:,h the Land lfse Polic42s of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a ma;,tsr consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land 'F• a Element; and (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrim-atal to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific f0dings bf fects set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and -, concludes as follows: (a) That the subject propert;, is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use p; tie surrounding area; and (b) T`at the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and General Plan. (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the � 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the Califoc -nia Environmental Quality Act of 1870 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon tte findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Plannin g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 12th day of April, 1989, of Development District Amendment 89 -01 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. _1L' 11 PLANNING COM"AISSION RESOLUTION NO, RE: ENV. ASSESS. & DDA 89 -01 April 12, 1989 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF :APRIL, 1S89. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCPJ CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad uulltx, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by tike Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April,•1989, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: j �GO� A 4 J 1 4C,, o� to Q ve �o� O9 °i tre A ie "o Eee' 1Z, 19 �aet5 �e` 1a��eC p0A �e s�cai�stii3l + �Qii1 a� a�a qty Q,ar ;sta0t Q pE�-� of °� 2 3Q�c� S� aim h�ba1a OA�6. Graaa 0�11ei,*�%N sei P�� OaQ� es�i G��a 0011 p 6i �a S • ys6 a0e ° st�o9 tre G S4ec Ge��ei 1 i ��GM, Gyn OZ�1GsP�� a an 8 N\\esaYa�,Q °S� tov,." e Ges a e1�Q�c� o,�h����1 • ��,G�' at 66 a F° trelp1�' onstil�Qa° h aia , l2. -\Oye ge ' AQ SG`�1e�10N• ova, 0QtNo i °{ r Resiaentia ty dog G�rSJ� O,OG� �p0 S�eQJeSOi Pce ° e °n�s�Se app ei pct� �,aoa 0 Yy ��ts Q Goy tie Rest 1 A• s 'Cot IN e 1, G i�91e 0, S i 0a�� �1, ;ae154 � God i ty iae cca sop @ vesh t�a , �o�s • ° e�si f o t Re Oes o '�r 0 °occNaa� + Ve10 O��bces d Os p1a�; qty �oic�tl�rQei �i lei o� SQi �;ae 0ei,�M -, G°1� 9 ���oicretc� ci G. co Q ted N° Oast G� at�ons.%- patio 1�1 +lest X09 Ga1c� Sonata A 326 4etaca, t 4 X60 Lw �g tart oe 2, Fay pa, s F e1 2q0 kN CORREA06TI 1 " '1 Ic CITY OF PAANCHO CUCAMONGA RETORT DATE: April 12, 1989 ;Iz > TOa Chairman and Members of the Planning. Commission W7 ! FROM.. Brad Bullir, City Planner By: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89 -04 DELAPIEGRA - A requsst to esta5liSh the sale of ar liquor for on -sitz' consumption at Felipe's, an existing restaurak: of 2,580 square feet on .86 acres of land in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific plan (Subarea 3), located in the Miller's Outpost Center at 801? Archibald Avenue - APN: 1077 - 641 -69. I. PROJECT AND SITE. DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a non- construction Conditional Use Permit for on -site consumption of hard liquor. V. Surrounding land Use and Zoning: oll�tr F - Elementary school; LOW Bensity Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Bank; Community Commercial East - Retail, Single Family Residential; Community Commercial, tow Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Retail; Specialty Commercial C. General Plan Designations: Project Site omnun y ommercial North - Elementary School South - Community :Commercial East - Community Commercial, Low Density Residential (2 -,, dwelling units per acre) West - Cermunity Commercial 0. Parking Calculations: Type of Square Parking Use Footage Ratio Retail 44,440 1/250 Medical 2,376 11200 Restaurant 968 11100 Fast Food 1,.90R 1/75 Felipe's 2,360 1 /100 Number of Number of Spaces Spaces Required Provided 178 12 10 95 Z4 W 240 tTW L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CU? 89 -04 - DELAPIEDRA April 12, 1989 Page 2 Although parkin; is not an issue for this Conditional Use Permit request, staff i• *.es that the center 'lacks 9 parking spaces for its current occupancy (see above Parking Calculations). However, upon . numerous visits to the site, staff has noted no parking problems. However, in the future, restaurant, medical offices or any use that requires a parking ratio greater than one space per 250 square feet would not be permitted due to the current occupancy in the center. E. Applicable Re u_lattons: The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plaft requires restaurants 'serving alcoholic beverages %a thin the Community Commercial District to obtain a Conditic:ial Use Permit. II. ANALYSIS: A. Ge,.tiral: The applicant purpose;: to serve hard liquor to he consumed on the premises. It is the applie—t s intention to serve 5 o 6 beverages {see Exhibit V' -,. Further, a happy hour from 3:00 p.m. to 5 :00 p.m. is intended. Currently, Felipe's Taqueria is open seven days a week from 10 :00 a.m. to 9:00 P.M. The applicant proposes to add cocktails to their existing menu of rexican food and beer /wine. the addition of the sale of hara liquor is not expected tin increas, business significantly. No antertainmer.(. exists, nor is any proposed. B. Compatibility: The applicant does not intend to modify the ex'stidq`°fiours of operation, however, tie applicant does propose to add a "happy hour. The "happy hour" is intended for the hours of 3:00 p.m. and S.-GO p.m., which is prior to the end of a business day; therefore significant traffic is not expected. Vany of the businesses within the center have similar c+ ,)erating hours. The sate of hard liquor should not produce any changes in the outward appearance of operation. Therefore;, no adverse impacts should be experienced by neighbori,ig businesses or properties. C. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt from prov suns of e 'California Environmental Quality Act, Article 19, Section 16301. a 0 I U-7 9 7 PLANNING QomrSSION STAFF REPORT CUB 89 -04 DELAPIEDRA April 12, 1989 Page 3 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 1) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan and the objectives of the Development 'Cede, and the purposes of the foothill Boulevard Specific P.an in which the site is located. 2) The proposed use w :ll not 4c Uladrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, ; -wr materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3) The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plar IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as pL,. ,c hearing n e aai_yr ort newspaper, property posted, and notices sent to all ,rope —fir y owners and existing tenants within 300 feet of the project, V. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve on l4nal Use Permit 89 -04 through the adoption of the attached R. = =s61vtion and Conditions of Approval. Respectfully Lit,Iec?, wry i Brad Buller . City Planner BB :CR:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Res.lution of Approval )--s Felipe and Aima De La Pledra. qu�er,lp. City of Rancho Cucamonga To k;iom It May Concerne Felipe's has been operati'g in Cucamonga over five years serving mexican focd beer and wine, We have been involved in many community events and functions. Li F The reason for requesting a C.O X. (liquor license) is because first, -of customer request, second, I would like to create a better atmosphere for the business community as well es continuing a family environment. My intentions is to only have a limited bar mer a which will consist of only ± to 6 beverages. I will include a happy hour from 3 vt: 5 p,frs, which specialy appetizers and sea -food will be served. Operating hours will stay the same 10am to 9pm everyday with a crew of 10 employees for lurch and dinner.. I would greatly appreciate your time and consideration. ' f F Lip :IEDRA }I of Alver , 0 Millers Outpost Plaza • 8017 Archibald Avenue • Cucamonga, CA 91730 0 '714) 980 -4252 e s Z 4 �aOwi�� • aw,(g! Y ,• LW a '•y I rs, e co �a 0 0- cu NORTH 1 Y OF ITEM: �v9• ®� ,A 'C O CUCA O GA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION L-6' EXHIPIT. - "V SCATS f1c,H°f S 1passl LLIO +. r Kr%A MAPS TWVsA so' CI'T'Y OF ONA RANCHO ,rv' TITLE: �- 0 N RESOLUTION VO. A RESOLUTION OF THE "PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOWjA APPROVING CG 1TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89- 04 FOR SALE OF !BARD LIQIOR FOR ON -SITE CONSUMPTION WITHIN AN EXISTING RESTAURANT OF 2,360 SQUARE FEET LOCATED AT 8017 ARCHISAW AVENUE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA a), ANT MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077 - 641 -69. A. Recitals. (i) Felipe Delapiedra has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 89 -04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 12th of April 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (III) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFOR(, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth 'in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 11. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 12, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Comnissitm hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 8017 Archibald Avenue within a center with a street frantagE of 610 feet and 1rt depth of 330 feet and is presently improved with a Community Commercial Center, and elementary school, the property to the south of that site onsistssofea bank the property to the east is single family residences and retail; and the property to the west is retail. The application is for the incidental sales of alcoholic beverages as menu items in conjunction with the sales of food. L.-(. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 8904 - DELAPIEDRA April 12, 1989 Page 2 (d) The application is for the addition of cocktails to an existing retaurant menu of mexican food and beer /wine. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That; the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan in which 'he site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together' with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimeptai to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code... 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California 'cnvirenrental Quality Act of 1570 and has determined it to be exempt per Article 19, Section 15301, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. 1. This approval shall apply to the serving of alcoholic beverages only. 2. Approval of this requer'�, shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Foothill Specific Plan, all applicable City Ordinances, Foothill Fire District requirements and Public Health codes. 3. Any modification, expansion or other change in operation will require a revision to the Conditional Use Permit. 4. All signage shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance cnd applicable Uniform Sign Program and shall require review and approval by the PTanning Division. L— r C 11 FLANNitG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 89 -04 w DELAPIEDRA April 12, '"`R9 Page 3 S. The serving of alcoholic beverages must be in conjunction with restaurant usage and the availability of full listed menu items. The sale and serving of 'toita�;, beverages shalt cease when such ftnu items are not available to customers. 6. The serving of alcohol in conjunction with restaurant usage t may operate between the hours of 10.00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. ' 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 2969. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOOGA BY. arry T. FEW-el, a rm fi ATTEST: Brad auller, Secretary ` 1, Brad Buller, r x:retary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby Certify that tht foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meting of the Planning Commission hold on the 12th day of April 1989, by the fo{lowlq vote -to -wit: i AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CtiWISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: L 1 C II'X UV KANUHU UUUAMUNUA MEMORANDUM DA;'E: FROM: "nt SUBJECT kanoinc� olvr -.ion Ci +y a} 2cncho Cucamoncict l�- c.:ncho �- �cc..moncict y Cif cltl3t� to Wlvrm i-- rrvq conce-rn IU{ -6q ..,c: Ry APR TO i t ` . iyr. L am w inci +his lclter in concern 0' Felipr,'s Nord liquor recivea }. Z'vr+ Grew- ExPcc,�ctki�v�� r taa ern ill to;^ior. toca�--d our dcor5 ciown �rorn \iper5. t'ly concern, `s i?,a my foddicr --joy wor. wi+h me. Grid in t1 yeaw tha:' S, have. Loo: r'v.ed 04 hhc. �anci,o gore L nave nol-iccd 'Hat' +hrr le,mcN lime. C.ra�.ud Cz } � �hr Cak,Svm� ion+ o} Iur�; crtd beer are Mr Q� aware a� peo�iG +�altc ir,� crc *o55 -l•r,e po rLirci to -. C�i11 �hc xr�,inc, •�� hard t tc1v�r tncxea7c �h�� v,- ,c�wcrrar,G�a O} ()eoplc c�ra children ? -rnc , 15 alsa art zlerncr,�-ar� School locc+C6 beel,wd and the . ml(t t 'kV cm tart✓ Several cl,tlolrer� :.sl-,C1 rrse�i- 'l'heir ec�ren }S in '4•he. matt parlcirn k-0 rrdea \rtiorre • -L {ca,i yak ml i-t,e. elernen}cari lids n,al be- ci• r C oL r f lei rpe5 i 5 ctll -3wecl -to 5ervt hard t;gvvr dVrirq yhe lo --h }erne ltxjr, 7L 1'De,l►eum Felyea G.. kl,r,vinq lav,rs ss wti-hgvl bard �kR\) roy. r why pvV Ghrtclren ct� rigL FTr +tom r�M3.:)n k1540.cl Ca\Jov'e— L Am cxc�catr,,4 +r" �)crvinol 3� hard lrgvot- b A �kipe=5. 5tnceml4 i Cam+ Cxpc�t'an3. 0 - -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT za DATE: April 12, Ing TO, Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Naves, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT 126yg - BLANTON - A request to 41elete a par on o-f g e c"` ci—a{ trail sys m a scent to the proposed Comm pity Trait on the South We of 24th Street for a subdivision of 135 single family lots and three common lots on 67.57 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) Within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, T o =!:d at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street - APN: 226-111-38 and 39. 1. BACKGROUND: On November 13, 1985, tftl Planning Commission reviewed on ad"'p`proved Tentative Tract 12659 for the development of 135 single family lots and 3 common lots. A condition of approval for this tract included the development of a local feeder trail system that would provide access to each lot. On September 9, 1987, the design review and a modification eliminating the requirements for the installation of bleachers and an announcer's stand was approved by the Planning Commission. Finally, on October 12, 1988, the Planning Commission granted a one year time extension for this tract to expire on November 13, 1989. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: TMO applicant is requesting ;o delete a portion of the foc -'al egM(Strian trail system along the north side of Lots 32 -37 and 40 -S3 (see Exhibit ''B "). Tnis request stems from revisions to the original grading concept for the tract. in reviewing the street plans for 24th Street, the Engineering Division requested that the grading be modified to drain to the street. Draining to 24th Street could result in extremely higl- slopes and retaining walls throughout the project. The applicant feels that the deletion of the local trail at the aforementioned locations will reduce the need for retaining walls and will not negatively impact the subdivision for the following reasons: ITEM M PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: MOO TO IT 12659 .. 8LANTON April 12, 1969 Page 2 1. There is a cc unity trail along `'th Street that is directly adjacent to the lczal trail (see Exhibit "D "). The trails are separated by a wall/fence. Other internal trails can connect to the comw4nfty trail. 2. Tentative Tract 12659 was originally approved allowing lots smaller than 20,000 square feet in exchange for a large equestrian lot strictly for the keeping of horses. Due to the smaller lot size, no horses are allowed on these individual single family lots. Therefore, the normal need for the rear yard access is not present. S. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewe osal on March 15, 1989. The Committee recommended approval of the modification. III. CORRESPOWENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The -Dail = Report newspaper and notices sent to all property owners within U"- feet of the project. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the modification to Tentative Tract 12659 through adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions. Res ly 8ra:' P r ' City Pi nner 66:SHsko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization K71p Exhibit "8" - Subdivision Ma,. Exhibit "C" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "D" - 24t3: Street Community Trail Original Resolution of Approval Resolution of ADProval with Conditions 1 01 E 0 CITE' OF RAND ]V CULL 4aN'GA PLA.NNM, DRg5M Y8 1 TITLE: Sim- EXHIBIT= A SCALE. f�, -NOR TH J 4 .1 ttjj C 1l,,trt 'k .r .J Ty st {f a y iy +N�c� � 5t �,d� jt '` �"t,F" �.a✓!}� t�t r p'` Q a•�aY � � oil to .,.. i � a � i a •�� + a� ;w1• ga' �i its a Iwo a i Q 4i a4 a +. .�axw sr iisf� •si.i�ir s. i.'� c i CITY OF ITEM: rq�v� iV GARY MITCHELL & ASSOCV. -i SS LAND PLANNimn CIVIL ENGINEERING 9330 SAS -11NE, SUITE 205 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 • PHONE (714) 984.9905 March 20, 1989 City of Rancho Cucamonga Original pQ ®r Quality Planning Division Attn.: Mr. Scott Murphy Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR EQUESTRIAN TRAIL DELETION - TRACT 12659 Dear Mr, Murphy: This letter is written to request that a modi£icetion to a condition of approval pertaining to required equestrian trails for Tract 12659 be scheduled fat consideration by the Planning Commission. This change is requested due to the following new develoments which have transpired after the original Tentative Tract approval. First, certain design changes to the drainage plans for the south side of 24th Stroot. Cwost of Etiwanda Avenue), by the City Enginooring Division have rosalted in changes to the drainage within the Community Trail along the northern tract toundary. The drainage plans had boon designed to accept a small amount of surface water within the equestrian trail. Since the drainage plans wore required to be altered to eliminate flow into the trail, grr,ding within the tract has bees, revised accordingly. The requested deletion of an intorior trail located along tho same area a3 the Community Izail waa roviowed by the Trails Committo-� which has recommended its approval. It should be pointed out that this trail deletion will not adversely aft•ect ocluestrian .:ccass to any lot within the project. or restrict access r- the central equestrian center in the project. We have designed alternate connection points of the remaining ntorzor trails to assuro continuous trail accoss throughout the project and to the Community Trail. I plan to be present at the April 12th Planning Commissic,l meeting to raepond to any questions or concerns affecting this request Thank you got you;. assistance in this pcojoct Truly Yours dry oF CU 'PLANNING D 1 GARY J'TCHELL & ASSOCIATES n Gary tchall ygq��yss� Fro- nt - q� giShoe�: 1Tj{ 10� a `FLEA , �Iler ('r3Y1nn(I f+} EXHIBIT- C -_ SWATS- °� y%Cy"•�!..1,'•t_� ®, F.?::25:i'iGS'1 .�.31�® Si'�.': •' �.'('Sl ".�'�i2;'�''�1i��,.M STREET PARKWAY 24TH. STREET FIARKWAy ISION TITLE: EXIT: AD 1 .. { - i• ?�-z� i -• _ rte- ;.mow ,�,.w� ' .rU —�\ •spy 1.. � '•wa\ AML t °� y%Cy"•�!..1,'•t_� ®, F.?::25:i'iGS'1 .�.31�® Si'�.': •' �.'('Sl ".�'�i2;'�''�1i��,.M STREET PARKWAY 24TH. STREET FIARKWAy ISION TITLE: EXIT: AD 1 RESOLUTION NO. 85 -166 A — LUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12659 WHEREAS, 'tentative Tract Map No. 12659 hereinafter "MAP" submittEd by Wayne Blanton, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Oernardinc, Skate of California, described as that 67.67 acres, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of 24th Street - APN 225- 011 -35, into 135 numbered and 3 letteoed lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on November 13, 1985; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Flanning Corm'ssion has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence gresented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Co=ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1; The Planning Commissirn makes the following findings in regard to ent�`ative Tract Nu. 12639 and tha Map thereof: (a) The tentative tra,,t is consistent with the General Plan, Development Co,;e, and specific plans; ;b) The design or improvements of the tentative trait is consistent with the General Plan, nevelopment Code, ,,id specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) Tha tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for accesr, through or ^f the property within i the proposed subdivision. (g) That this project will not create edverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is iEsued. m-? PLANNING COMMISSION 450LUTION � Page #2 SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12659, a copy of which is attached hereto; is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard conditions: Design Review: 1. Revisions shall be incorporated into the equestrian area to the satisfaction of the Trails Advisory Comrittee (Lot A) as follows: a. Trailer parking spaces should be designed as pull - through. b. 'some of the trailer spaces should be large enough to accommodate 4 -horse trailers. C. Gates on the central arena should be provided on the east and west ends, as opposed to the north and south sides. i d. Bleachers shall be provided for the main arena. I e. Utilities, pad, etc., should be made available to accommodate future installation of an announcer's booth. i f. Ramps on manure pits should be more gradual, and a landing should be provided at the top. g. Manure pits should be located on inside of loop road further away frog the housas. h. Horse wash ,ig areas require a cement pad, and the spigot is to be located outside of railing. i. Hitching posts should be positioned adjacent to both ends of dii tack rooms, J. Horse watsring t:^oughs should be provided. k. Feeders and water basins on individual 'horse stalls should be positioned on outside of stall fencing. 1. 5 -rail high fencing should be used on horse stalls. M. Metal tack rcoms are not very durable; an alternative type of constructioi should be used. 2. The equestrian easement on the west side of Lot 129 shall be extended westerly along the south side of Lot 128 to align with the trail provided along the east side of Lot 92. The equestrian easement between Lot's 105 & 107 shall be extended northeasterly between Lots 106 & 107 to "C" Street. r)-) $ PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION Page 3 3. Ten (10) foot corner ,cut off easements shall be recorded on the final map for local feeder trails per City Standard #1001. 4. A final coraprehet.lve design of the equestrian area including, but not necessarily limited to, a standard design for all tack r*om conotruction, a landscaping and irrigation plan, a lighting plan, and details of the restroomlearetaker facilities shall be brcught back for review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior to final recordation of the map. S. Perimeter improvements shall include the construction of walls along 24th Street and Hanley. The wall type should be open nature such as wrought iron. Design of the perimeter treatment of the tract including, but not necessarily limited to, details of perimeter �.alls /fences, landscaping, and community trails shall be brought back, for review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior to , "inal recordation of th:- map. 6. Design elevations and building footprints shall be brought back through the Design Review prwess for the review and approval of the Planning Commission prior to final map recordation. All roofing materials shall be concrete tile. Variety to the. footprints and elevationti shall be achieved consistent with the architectural guidelinos of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and numbers shall conform to the requirements of Figure 5 -45 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. A statement shall be included in the CCARs for this tract notifying property ouaers that thy: architectural design of their dwellings must be consistent with t1'.e guidelines of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 7. Tree planting shall be consistent with the windrow planting policy of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. E. Lots fronting on Etiwanda Avenue shall be developed in accord with the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Disrict and Special Access Policy as stipulated in the Etiwanda Specific Plan.. 9. The Etiwanda Avenue /24th Street Intersection Mail be designed as a community entry per Figures 5 -10 and 5 -11 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 10. The 24th Street parkway shall be developed with rrn equestrian trail and bike path, and the Etiwanda 'venue parkway shall be developed with bike path per Figures 5 -27, 5 -32, and 5 -33 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. )-'Yl 19. 11• �eedera,�s saa CaS 1 � Au,, ��Yaii a, dess7jtic PS�ch red aYOV its staYent W uesahe t �d� h�QVe or �c4 th a to de 1 r tr spec i:y vii ion th di1 is 1 °t'eStria had Gomfiue mated °lot ty fir. 4° t °ail bea �° eeGuo, space r'.v':-- '\ COfe Coo ,mP S Vayt4 ens °Sion ted system• the e t tk is e p for the t 4a oe eaten °tree s for Gorr art Op sP 12, Str;ey P� {otore inters aetaiied G °et�at pia ° iVe -\°pment• Han iGai us and v entde�eiop nth asini to of de Phas t i0 atino° improi be .ti �tedel ph print phase ent're by'i° e co indiGa Gl+ S e� S A �w0co Nee ie t'na fl, thIt a �o ofU Zhe ar3 ro��r th be Coo'? is Wi radio9osed derat e m dici9 i3 • P, eat iEpt p Sha: ;ng one cent. It as o1P Go1\si �d b e gra aele ova ep aoy dwei a del ti e OV aeSitSn Gt SA ee a '4 °rK inn imp° arty o th at fo1 rode 6hiev cape ails °GGaP ash pt °mPiis ae s cf 5 tothQ tO a inai i of �e �� iod� 1& • sha e bt aar i9Caden0 each a �aP a w r°� a, eaie�+ents� app , rs s b �� -I%cy of io eGOr�a�NCA e 1 Sr- e4u� r,an if �iA10 scheme • f iraiittod f o F tcnent' ore '�3. t° srbm ittee' tr for pAr d �1be s °f G od s�aP a a i�Warda c ei Pa r °5ti p GGfeiG c ppliann der eiar Gave e fr °r . °r o{ data t. shall nmaNan1ey P ed Per �ti�an� e P y� Gr • si+� .4e �rac iop�� en�'S ° nstro� ed P e roe t pity Eo9 tion ba �tati de.4 w() .0e be r.o dSr.19 a pN • the rater 1• �e eat i S�a�i and \a\, ti�aedctian °f d as a ureet, 2qt!� 3rd e�' 16 f , SatiSfa d cp °Stine f itioo5 yrboundary 2• Standard 5.oe, to ned ar ity 2n9 tra"'S soothe Neer- de o St ; RVen ii b� s © the G race e fry tray es prior t e e H tag" �a �s {a,t� ro��fiea�au P o� of t� ©r ira9e f a 3 • �t the yhai Aoa9 Me sat'f ac L s Storm Dele'\ Za lr a6 to th the City d . fo 23rd gtrr sraG Mai Delei Wk Zra g. <ec °r _� PLANNING COMMISSION gkESOLUTION Page #5 6. Street improvements on Etiwanda Avenue, adjacent to subject tract, shall be constructed with the first phase of development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. Developer shall repaf:r the rack curb along Etiwanda Avenue from subject tract to Higijland Avenue for drainage purposes, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS' 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: .Dennis L. taut, Chairman ATTEST: 64e"�' --- Brad Bul er, Deputy ecretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of kancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of November, 1985, by the following vote -to -Witt AYES COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. 85 -168A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMIS31ON OF 7HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(iA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12659 TO DELETE A PORTION OF THE LOCAL TRAIL SYSTW. ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY TRAIL ON THE SOUiN SIDE OF 247H STREET FOR A SUBDIVISION OF 135 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND THREE CC14MON LOTS ON 67.67 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESiDEN71AL DISTRICT (1 -2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCA7ED AT THE Q11!?Lt"::ST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225 -111 -38 AND 39 A. Recitals. O On November 13, 1985, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 85 -168, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions, Tentative Tract Map No. 12559, which provides for the development of 135 single family lots and S common lots on 67.67 acres of land within the Very Low Residential District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. (ii) The above - described property is loczted at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street and is ;within the 'VL (Very Low Residential) District. (iii) On March 20, 1989, a modification request was filed with the Planning Division for the deletion of the local feeder trail equestrian easements along the northern boundary of Lots 32 -37 and 40 -53. (iv) On the 12th of April, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga cond,pcted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded :aid hearing on that date. occurred.. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this P.esolution have P. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:; 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, o:,' this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -r0ere nced public hearing on April 12, 1589, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this i Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: r)-) ,1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N3. 85 -168A RE: MODIFICATION TO 7 12659 BLANTON April 12, 1989 Page 2 v (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, 6evelopnent Lode, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans, and (c) The site is physically suitable for the cype of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivisio, is not likely to cause substantial environmes;,al damag and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health prob "ems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract w ?11 not conflict with any easeattint acquired by the public at large, now of record, for eccess through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 3. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issued a Negative Declaration on November 13, 1985. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the tronification to Tentative Tract 12659 and hereby modifies Resolution uo. 85 -158 by changing Condition No. 11 under Design Review, and adding Condition No. 8 under Tentative Tract, to read as follows: Design Review 11. A feeder trail system for equestrian use shall be required. Such trails shall be located within easements and shall be designed as a continuous network providing access to each lot, excluding lots 32 to 37 and 40 to 53. These lots shall gain access throughout the project and to the comtmtnity trail by the use of alternate connection points. Impravements shall be consistent with the City adopted Equestrian frail Standards and their construction shall be accomplished concurrent witk' lot grading and street improvements. rn - 1S PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 85 -168A RE: MODIFICATION TO TT 12659 - BLANTON April 12, 1989 Page 3 Tentative Tract 8. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the _�*-Iurth Street Rock Crusher project, in a standard format as detern}ined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a deposit on any property, S. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoptior, of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 1989.. PLANNING COMMISSION OF 711E CITY OF RANCHO CUCMQRGA BY: Larry e , Chairman ATTEST: Brad u er, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Minning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April, 1989, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: HOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, MEMORANDUM f DATE: April 12, 1989 �1 TO: Chairman and Members of t nning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Vlanner/7`, BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant 'Planner cucanft, SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO THE VIRGINIA DARE PARKING STUDY - A review of mo icati —ois to the shared par King concept and projected parking demand for the Virginia.Dare renter. Staff recommends this item be continued to the May 24, 1989 Planning Commission meeting to allow for completion and review of the revised parking study. BB:TG:sp ITEM El 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 12, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner .cnk oc is =7 4 SUBJECT: INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN - A request to initiate an aMe-nament to the land use regu ations for Subarea 7, I. ABSTR;' ^,T: The applicant, Mid Valley Management Company, is requesting that the Commission initiate an amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 7, to permit building contractor uses. Currently, t+'iis use is neither permitted nor conditionally permitted within this subarea, which is designated "Industrial Park ". Staff is seeking Commission direction on whether to initiate an amendment, and this report is not intended t- be a comprehensive analysis of the issue. II. ANALYSIS: The ISP currently h"s two categories for buildwig contractor uses, which are defined below: Buildis Contiractor's Offices and Yards: Activities typically include offices and swage of equipment, materials, and vehicles for contractors who are in t,"e trades involving construction activities which include, but are not limited to, plumbing, painting, electrical, roofing, carpentry, and other services. Screening of outdoor storage is required as per Section IV, A.6. (Storage Area /Screening). Building Contractor's Storage Yard: Activities include the maintenance ann ' ouidear storage of large construction equipment and outdoor storage of large construction equipment such as earthmovirg equipment, cranes, and outdoor storage of building materials in an unscreened manner. The applicant's request (see Exhibit "A ") concerns small operation building contractors, such as plumbers, ele#.tricians, carpenters, and similar tradesmen. These contractors typically are self- employed or employ only a few persons, do not utilize heavy equipment, store materials indoor only, and lease a small amount Of space (1500 square feet or lessl. ITM 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: ISP, SUBAREA 7 April 12, 1989 Page 2 The applicant believes this type of use is different from the contractor use described in the ISP. Further, the applicant states that these smaller operation contractors are very similar to other permitted uses in Subarea 7, such as custom manufacturing, office, light warehousing, business supply retail sales and services, business support services, and building maintenance services, among other=. The applicant specifically mentions the building maintenance services use as being similar to that of the small operation building contractor. The ISP defines building maintenance services as follows. Building Maintenance Services: Activities, typically Include, u,; are not limited to: maintenance and custodial services, window clearing services, disinfecting and exterminating services, and janitorial services. III. ISSUES: Currently, the ISP does not differentiate between buiT ding contractors which utilize heavy construction equipment at.,t have outdotr storage yards (large operation contractors) and those which do not (s -all operation contractors). Hence, all contractors fall uner one land use category (which may or may not be Osirable). Generally, building contractor uses are not compatible with office, light warehousing, research, and retail uses which have higher design standards in terms of building architecture, site design, landscaping, etc. Consequently, the ISP excludes buildinn contractor uses from the Haven Avenue Overlay District and from subareas, such as Subarea 7, designated as "Industrial Park ". Building contractor uses are permitted or conditionally permitted in most subareas (see Exhibit "C "). tt appears from this exhibit that the ISP provides sufficient area in which to locate building contractor uses, regardless of whether the contractor has an outdoor storage yard or uses heavy construction equipment. However, if small operation building contractors do not use heavy equiNnent or store materials in outdoor storage yards, they may be compatible in subareas which permit such uses as building maintenance services and light manufacturing. In this case, the only area which may be of concern is the vehicle uses by the small operation contractor. Frequently, a small operation contractor wile use pick -up trucks to travel and transport small building materials between the office and the job site. (S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: ISP, SUBAREA 7 April 12, 1989 Page 3 Fovever, some of these trucks may be quite large, weathered, and in disrepair from being or, ine job site. From an aesthetic standpoint, this woulJ tend to negatit�Rly impact "Industrial Park" zoned areas. Ye': these sam„ types of trucks may also be used by janitorial services, enterminating services, maintenance /custodial services, and other uses defined in they Building Maintenance Services land use category, which is permitted in Subarea 7. IV, OPTIONS• If the Commission believes that the applicant's request has merit, the following a;tions could be taken: I. Initiate an ISP amendment to permit or conditionally permit Building Contractor's Offices and Yards in Subarea 7; 2. ErZiblish a new ISP land use category (thr4mgh a text amendment) defining a small operator building Aontractor (a contractor without a storage yard or any heovy construction equipment) and permitting or conditionally permitting such uses in Subarea 7 and /or ot`& subareas as the Commission feels is appropriate; 3» Include small operator building contractors in the Building Maintenance Services la-1 use definition by rewording its definition thra�sgh an ISP text amendment; 4. Include all contractors in the existing land use aefinition by amending the text of the ISP and rewording the land use title to read: "Building Contractor's Office and /OR Yards"; 5. Not initiate any amendment; or 6. Any other option the Commission may deem desirable, V. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission c"sider Ae op ions listed above and direct staff to proceed with tho desi course of action, if any is desired.. Respectfp ly s� mitted, - f Brad Buller 14r- fly City Planner 88:BH:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A'' - Request Letter Exhibit "S' - Subarea 7 Exhibit "C" - Map of Area Permitting Contractor Uses C3_3 March 6, 1989 City Planni *g Department =;o Brad Buller P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cuc=Ongu, CA 91730 RE: Amendment of Industrial Specific Flan Dear Mr. Buller: The Arrow Business center to located in an I1?-7 im:1d use zone. this designation restricts gen -rel contractors whc ' ^i into two catsgorias- Building Contractorve Offices and Yards vita sareeneu storage, and Buildiap Contractor's Storage Yard kith unscreened sturage. 'tuft planning departsgent has taken the position that all general contractors are rastri tad in the IP -7 zone even if they hive no ouLdcar storage and heavy squipeant requirrrants. Ve are requertiag that the department re- coneider thiv position. The amall genoral contractors who lease space in our center take space of 1500 square .eat or lane. l-.ey ow one or ewd pick -up trucks but no heavy construction equiptucut. 7,'heir o7 ations ccnaist of office naa mac ware- house storage. All caastruction . ;k and material delivery is dust at the job sites - not at their units. These small general contractors do not impactt on the center any differently than other approved users such ay printers or building maintenance servicna. .mod like to initiate whatever procedures are available to us to have this matter reconsidered. Very V7 ly Yours, 1Y MAC % ANY ts _. urk Leasing FS.aager cc: David Leff 11 Un Wh-'9 sea t"" . SW * 103 . R-rc 0==A C MVId. 41770 • (714) t"&W I QTY OF POTENTIAL AW ER�D 1T ITEIV . E"REA 7 OF THE st y RANCHO CUCA ONGA TITLE FIE, EGAST LEITER �I PLANNING DIVISION q EXHIBIT: A.� El Nbie: Pvret tats mw tot cardt,r`ed" am sh"m as No - zwoe"m oft. 'The sites shown may net be carraally ow ftf twr Is the rosstten t3te sp0e The tatl b order �.I a R* is m * k*Um eof 0�loctod Mlare need L'+et ataykIN CITY '. RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION ITEM: MAN9 - IASP TITLE: SMAREA a EXHIBIT: L SCALE: ss rat d J LOCA►TM OF COMPLEX CtpCULAT_ ION TRAILSiRcum 120' ILO.W. 0000. pedeetdw .r°'� Gaeke i Ctemsh (� .Rte Ststbnl. v a. ®r 100' R.O.W. 0000 "sb n e� SS' or less ILf.W. j3== RO W tupiY�f .�. Access }OMb HAIL SERVICE - I1CisF, ...... Proposed Nbie: Pvret tats mw tot cardt,r`ed" am sh"m as No - zwoe"m oft. 'The sites shown may net be carraally ow ftf twr Is the rosstten t3te sp0e The tatl b order �.I a R* is m * k*Um eof 0�loctod Mlare need L'+et ataykIN CITY '. RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION ITEM: MAN9 - IASP TITLE: SMAREA a EXHIBIT: L SCALE: ss rat d USE TYPES Lana flea° I;a GI GI I GI I GI GI I IP I IP I GI IMIQ GI GI IP GI Gl HI IP IP Subareas 1HOI 1 1 2 13 _ 4 g _ 6 17 i 6 19 _101111-4 2 13 i4 1 T5116 TT 8WIdIng Contractor's OHlce ! Vords 0 # !r {+ + r Building Contractor's Storage Yard e PERMITTED USO $ CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE NOTE: Non - marked Uses Not Permitted ' 117- Industrial Park GI- Generai induatrial WHI- Minimam impact Heavy ndustrlai HO -Haven Ave. Overlay District HI -Heavy Industrial CITY O RANCHO CC NA PLANNING DIVISION 0 2 RQTEE"AL AA EW3MNT 9 !TEM:..BAR� OF THE 1&3 MAP OF AREA PEF#XrnNG TITLE sOR Uws EXHIBIT: �, — SCALE M +nat64— riTy OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C& - STAFF REPORT G40 ' ; �;� a 'h DATE: April 12, 1989 r9i7 70: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner SUBJECT: PLANNING DIVISION WORK PROGRAM 1989/90 ! I. BACKGROUND: On February 9, 1989, the Planning Commission held a svor s op o review the status of exit�ting planning programs, and to discuss a new work program for the upcoming two fiscal years. Staff presented a preliminary work program and obtained feedback from the Commissioners on items to be added. At the time, staff indicated the work program would be modified and brought back for Commiss ^a review. AML The attached work program has been modified to include items the Commission requested, as follows: CURRENT PLANNING Item 14: Compact Car Parking Study Item 15: Parking Lot Lighting Study ADVANCE PLANNING Item 8: Senior housing Sine Location and Design Criteria Study CODE ENFORCEMENT No Change As we already indicated, there is no way that all these programs can be completed given the existing demands on staff time and exis" ng resources. The work program itens are therefore prioritized in three groups and our ability to complete them will be dependent in part on budgetary considerations and in part on the volume of development applications submitted. 11. RECOMMENDATION: It is recomm ;tided that the Commission review the ached work program summaries to assure that all requested items have been included and that they are in the appropriate priority t� group. ITEM P 1 PLANNING COMPASSION STAFF REPORT RE: 1989/93 WORK PRNRAM April 12, 1989 Page 2 Respec f submitted, Brdd B 1 er City anner BB: :ko Attachments El CURRENT PLANNING WORK PROGRAM SUlWY FISCAL YEAR 1989 -91 PROGRAM ITEM YEAR STATUS WKS PROGRAMS WE CAN ACCOMPLISH WITH CURRENT STAFFING: 1. Development Processing Services 89/91 On -going 756 2. Public Information Zarvices 89/91 On -going 168 3, Geographic Information Services 89/91 On -going 5 4. North Etiwanda Specific Flan 89/90 In progress 20 5. Design Criteria Guidebook (Support Only) 89/90 in progress 2 6. Regional Trails Agreement 89/90 In progress 3 New 84 7. Regional Mall l NEW OR CONTINUED PROGR94S WE MUST ACCOMPLISH AND NEED MORE STAFF: Office Kinual Update 1. Growth Management Study & Implementation 89/91 In progress 35 2. Trails Implementation "Study 89/90 On hold 10 3. Tree Ordinance Update 89190 On hold 5 4. Development Code Update 90/91 On hold 30 S. Foothill Streetscape Specifications 89/90 New 5 6. North Etiwanda Development Processing 89/91 New 84 7. Regional Mall 89/91 New 10 8. Manufactured Home Regulations 89/90 New 4 9. Film Permits 89/90 New 4 10. Special Projects 89/91 On -going 42 14. Compact Car Parking Study 90/91 New 3 TH PROGRAMS WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE ACCOMPLISHED, BUT NEED MORE STAFF: New 3 1. Office Kinual Update 90/91 On hold 3 2. Commercial /Industrial Policies 89/90 Draft 2 3. Edison Transfnrmer Study 90/91 On hold 2 4, Multi- Family Setback Study 89/90 On hold 3 5, Entertainment Ordinance Amendment 89/90 On hold 2 6. Adult Business Zoning Controls 90/91 On held 5 7. Historic Landmark Kiosk Sign Program SO /91 On hold 2 8. Cut -de -sac Design Study 90/91 On h0 d 2 9. Grading Ordinance (Support Only) 89/90 On hold 1 10. ISP Standards Amendment 89/90 New 5 11. Uniform Sign Program Format 90/91 On nold 2 12. Sign Design Guieelines Manual 89/90 Wew 5 13. Victoria Avenue Bike Trail 90/91 New 2 14. Compact Car Parking Study 90/91 New 3 15. Parking Lot Lighting Study 90/91 New 3 �3 CURRENT PLANNING WORK PROGRM AOL 1989 -1891 LA F— PROGRAM ITEM PAKS PROGRAMS WE CAN ACCOKPLISH WITH CURRENT STAFFING: 1. DEVEELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES: 756 This function prov.'es for the processing of all development applicaticlis (e.g. tracts, CUP's, design review, variances, etc.), and the coordination of the development /design review process from preliminary review to plan check and construction inspection. Year: 89/51 2. PUBLIC INFORMATION SERVICES: 168 This service is providing information to the public at the counter and ovar'the telephone. In addition, this. function includes processing minor permit applications (e.g. room additions, signs). Year: 89/91 3. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATIOP SYSTEM: 5 Implementation and testing of computerized informatin system for Current Planning, which includes pro3e±.'' tracking and reporting. Also invol;ies support vo Engineering and Building & Safety Divisions in the preparation of their information system modules. Year: 89/91 4. NORTH ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN: 20 Review of a comprehensive plan for the development of the sphere of influence area north of Etiwanda, including land use regulai,ions and design guidelines. Proposal would also include amendments to the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Support staff to Advance Planning. Year: 89/90 LA F— E W", PROGRAM ITEM P /WS S. DESIGN CRITERIA GUIDEBOOK g Assist Advanch Planning staff in preparing a design, supplement containing extensive gra�nics to communicate coRmunity design goals and standards. Year: 89/90 o. REGIONAL TRAILS AGREEMEN7: 3 Negotiation or a joint -use agreement for recreational purposes with San Bernardino County Flood Control Districz to use existing and proposed flood control facilities. Year: 89/90 PROGRAM ITEM NEW OR CONTIN r0 PROGRAM'S WE MUST ACCOMPLISH AND NEED MORE STAFF: 1. GROWTH MANAGEMENT STUDY & IMPLEMENTATION: A study of growth management techniques and their potential application to the City of Rancho ;'eucamoiga. Potential amendments to the General Plan and U :elopment Code as the result of City sponsored ballot rmasure or initiative. Year: 89/91 2. TRAILS IMPLEMENTATION STUDY: Development of a comprehensive plan for implementing the City's trail system. Includes administration of consultant contraGts for construction cost estimates, and a financing plan. Year: 89/90 3. TREE ORDINANCE UPDATE A review of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Attention will feces on the impact of the borer beetle on the Eucalyptus windrows and the feasibility or desirability of maintaining the windrows, particularly on private property. Year: 89/90 4. DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE: Asfiinistrative update and reprinting of Development Code. Year: 90/91 5. FOOTHILL STREETSCAPE SPECIFIC 7IONS: Consultant contract to produce a set of standards for street furniture, hardscape materials, and colors to implement the design policies of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Support staff to Advance Planning. Year: 89/90 V- P /WKS 35 10 5 30 5 1711 v PROGRAM ITEM ' P /WZS 6. ETIWANDA NORTH DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING: 84 Processing of all development appliLaitions, tentative tract maps and design reviews for prop \acts within the North Etiwanda Specific Plan area and cb.rdination of the review process from prelininary review tn, -ugh plan check and construction inspection. There is a potential for 5,231 single family lots. Year: 89/91 7. REGIONAL HALL: 10 Design review, plan check and inspection of Phase I of the Victoria Gardens Regiona? Mall which is anticipated to submit for Planning Commission approval between Fall 1989 and Spring 1990. Year: 89191 8. MANUFACTURED HOME REGOLATIONS 4 Amendment to Development Code regulations pertaining to installation of re-' homes on hom on s angle family lots and may ir;tude development of architectural requirements. Response to SB 2741 (Kapp) and SB 2827 (Greene). Years 89/90 9. FILM PERMITS: 4 Amendment to Developme r Code and /or Municipal Crude to adopt state's model process for granting film pert +tits in response to AB 46SO (Statham). Year: 89/90 10. SPECIAL. PROJECTS: 42 Year: 89101 13 PROGRAM ITEM P/W S PROGRAMS WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE ACCOMPLISHED, BUT NEEn MORE STAFF: 1.. OFFICE MANUAL UPDATE: 3 Revise manual as necessary to reflect current operatfng procedures for Current Pianni'ng. Year: 90/91 2. C:W.ERCIAL /;NDUSTRIAL POLICES: 2 Compilat +.;n of design policies for commewcial and industrial projec:5 based upon Planning Commission actions. Year: 89190 3. TRANSFORMER STUDY: 2 5tuQ of eksign standards for location and screening of pad- mounted transformerrs in response to Edison's new polfry of not a?lowing beicw grade Installations. Year, 90/91 4. Mi: TI- FAMILY SETBACK STUDY: 3 Review and amendment of setbacks for multi - family buildings within the panned cvowuni'ties. Year: 89/90 5. ENTERTAINMENT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: 2 Administrative clean -up of ordirance regarding annual renewals. Year: 89/90 6. ADULT BUSINESS ZONING CONTROLS: 5 Preparation of new regulations governing adult businesses, Year: 90/91 i 13 ic IE f PROGRAM ITEM P /WCS 7. HISTORIC LANDMARK KIOSK PROGRAM: T 2 "_ study of the feasibility of allowing certain uees, such as, historic sites or wineries, to particip",I in the BIA sponsored off -site subdivision kiosk sign program. Year: 90/91 8. CUL -DE -SAC DESIGN STUDY: 2 Review of design standards for cul -de -sac street bulbs, ':� particular, the feasibility of landscaped median ;siands. Year: 90/91 9. GRADING ORDINANCE: i Assist Advance Planning prepare more comprehensive grading standards, particularly la the hillside areas. Year: 89/90 10. ISP STANDARDS AMENDMENT: L Review and amendment of developme.tt standards in the Industrial Specific Plan in response to minimum level projects. Year: 89/90 11. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM FORMAT: 2 Prepare a standard format for n%; sign programs to follow to improve admin stratiun. Year: 90/91 12. SIGN DESIGN GUIDELINES: 5 Preparation under consultant contract of comprehensive design guidelines to serve as a guide for the businessperson and their sign designer. lltis rtIs identified as a need during last years neon /window sign amendments. Year: 89/9; P_q PROGRAM ITEM P /WK S 13. VICTORIA AVENUE BIKE TRAIL 2 1 Feasibility study rf potantial for a Class I Bike Trani and sidewalk alo::g Victoria Avenue and possible amendment to Etiwanda Specific Plan to accomplish same. Year: 90/91 14. COMPACT CAR PARKING STUDY 3 Review and amendment of standards for the use of compect parking spaces as contained in the Development Code. Year: 90/91 15. PARKING LOT LIGHTING STUDY 3 Review and possible amendment of standards for parking lot lights, such as height, shi,lding to prevent glary. Year: 90/91 El 11 in- PROGRAM ITEM ADVANCE PLANNING; WOR'� PROGRAM SUIVARY FISCAL YEAR 198941 YEAR STATUS WKS PROGRAMS WE CAN ACCOMPLISH WITH CURRENT STPFFING: 1. Community Development Block Grant 89/91 Ongoing 96 2. Inter - governmental Relations 89/91 Ongoing 84 3. General Plan Land Use Amendments 89/91 Ongoing 44 4. Geographic information System 89/91 In progress 20 5. Sphere of Influence Annexation Strate „7 89/9'1 Ongoing 14 6. Historic Preservation Program 89/91 Ongoing 98 7. Hazardous Waste Plan /Ordinance 89 -90 In progress 12 8. Expanded Air Qual";ty Element 90/91 New 24 9. Land Use b Demographi. Data Base 89/91 Ongoing 10 10. Housing Element update 89/00 Ongoing 31 11. Economic Developma-nt Activities 89/91 Ongoing 21 12. Design Excellence Award Program 19/91 Ongoing d 2. Hillside Grading Ordinance 9/90 Ongoing 4 14. Community Profile Update €39/91 Ongoing 6 15. Foothill /I -15 Freeway Beautification 89/90 Ongoing 7 16. Senior Housing Activities 89191 Ongoing 12 17. Etiwanda Noeth Specific Plan /Annex. 89.90 Ongoing X122 NEW OR CONTINUED PROGRAMS WE MUST ACCOMPLISH JW.' NEED MORE STAFF; 1. CEQA Guideline. UpdateJMitigation Monitoring Program 2. Special Projects 3. Advance Planning Data System Module 4. County Planning Referrals 5. General Plan Notice Requirement Amend. S. Senior Housing (SHOD) Sitat Location and Design Criteria Study /Ordinance Amendment 89/91 NQ, 84 89191 Jgoing 80 89191 On hold 44 8 "; _ 1 nns:,tng 20 .;9/90 NP-N 4 89!90 Now 8 89/90 New ice' PROGRAMS WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE ACCC:4PLISHED, BUT NEED MORE STAFF: 1. Landscape /irriCation Gui,.elines 2. Antenna Regulation Study, 3. Street Name Changes 4. Street naming Ordinance Update 5. Strategic Planning Program 6. Vacant Land Use Inventory Map 7. Water and Sewer Deficiencies Study 8. Freeway Location Notification of Purchasers - Subdivision Code Amend. 9. Old Alta Loma Specific Plan Z i 89/90 On hold 2 89190 On hold 2 89/90 On hold 6 89/90 On Mold 5 89/90 On hold 6 89/90 New 7 89/90 New ;0 89/90 F'r4 6 90/91 New i1 -'F11 AUYALIT PtAwir, Wig PRAMi" 1989 -1993 PROGRAii ITEM P /WlCS PROGRAMS WE CAN ACCOMPLISF WIrki CURRENT STAFFING: I. COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT BLOV GRANTS: Rancho Cucamonga`s funding for FY 88/89 is expected to be approxic�tely 5433,00. This area will cent; ntc:� to entail several distinct sets of responsibilities liat,ld as follows: a. Block Grant /Planning - 30 This i .,solves the process of assessing the community's needs, interacting with other departments an,; agencies, cow.unity groups and decision makers. Development ox application t9 RUa fc.r CfIHG mm funds for recommended P "4 ect. iso entails development of technical documentation including NrPA processing. Portions of this task dre to be contracted v,t, Year: 89/91 b. Block Grant /A 'minist, ation - 30 T':is component involves responsibilities associates with on going administration and mnitoring of the CDBG program to assure rorpliance with HUD t1quirai),tnts. PP'P nsiililities ntlude preparation of anaual Grantee Performance Reports, quarterly reports on contractorlsuhcontractor activities, and minority business activities, relocation, and ethers. Also requires keeping abreast of constant changes t- :eleral legislation and resulting changes in statutory regulation, and maintaining working rLlationships :pith HUD at both local and federal levels. Includes maintenance of financial, technical and enviromwatal files 7or monitoring by HUD for vommpliance with Federal regulaV ons and audits of financial records. Portions 0? this task are to be eontractel out. Year: 85/91 PR(rjR ,N IT €fit P /4K -S _ c. BI ock Grant /Program.:, Management - 16 This component cont?r-*•s of work required to implement or manage specific programs funded through Block Grants. This will include our Senior Repair Program and Rehabilitation Loan Program; as well as programs to be selected by the City Council. Rehabilitation Programs im,olve working with the County Office of Community Developmer', monitoring of County's Performance, negotiations, and resolving public grievances. (This is a tinie consuming activity: dealing with "people" problams; has to he handled with sensitivity.) Year: 89/91 d. wtreach - 12 Rectponsibilities include outreach aetivitiea such as advertising, articles, flyers, etc., providing information to the public. As a resort of HUD comments, we will need to continue our efforts in this area, with particular eiiphasis on minority participation in our programs. `dear: 89/91 e_ 1',ousing Assistance Plan b 8 Ac upda �x d RAP will %a required annually in as._,,. daince with Federal regulations. Year: 89/91 SOTI)TAL 96 2. INTER - GOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS: 84 Thi s area of v esponsibi i ,, involves i nfoniiation grthering, coo- �.;,iation, analysis a;., reports to various public agencies. Examkle5 include work with V.rAa (Regiotal Housing AllcrMon Mode,, Growth Forecasts, 208 plans, etc. ?, nt,rynborong cities /county (Foothill Coralunity Para, Greenbelt Stud} a, state agencies (Rt. 30 Freeway Study, riepartment of Fin ?nce) and nwnerous others rear- 1191 n PROGRAM ITEM r` /W S 3. GENERAL PLAN LANs, USE AMENDMENTS. 44 Continuous; to respond to applications and City Planning Comnissicn and City Council direction: 4 times pe- year, r-;v include EIR`s as reguJrad. Year: 89j91 4. GEOGRAPHIC WORMATION SYSTEM* 20 Complete development of computerized information and mapping system for Development and Revenue A&.essment. Also includes train';sg omt; development of basic operational for aP staff. Develop a format and 1imate for future .,inexations of the sphere area north of Alta Loma. Year: 89/91 S. SPHERE OF :fLUENCE A4?lW'— ''.ION STRATP.GY: 14 An appt'aach needs to be developed few initiation of future annexations. Will involve an assessment of individual areas to terns of fiscal impact" services, liability, timing and phasing; political implications Job and fersibility; work with AFC staff, County special districts, and key land - r._rs. Year: b9 /9I 6. niSTGRIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM: This area will continue to entail several distinct sets of r4sponsf Ni I i ties listed as follows: , i a. Landmark /Point of interest 2esign1tions -, 28 :his involves processing applications for Landmark /Point o;F Interest Historic Designations. Year: 89/91 b. Preservation Information Services - 8 Providing information services on historic properties and activities to local individuals, p "eservationists at other cities and at the State level. Year: 89/91 Ll t PRMRAM ITEM PAR S C. Coordination With Current 'llenning and Engineering - 10 Review and comment on proposals for new development that affect potential or designated historic sites. Year: 89/91 d. .education /Public Relations - 16 Preparation and distribution of information documents to educate the public and landmark owners about historic preservation. Year: 89/91 a. Special Projects 36 This area is to note projects and assignments as yet undetermined, but generally in t'de areas of historic area planning, ordinance revisions, oral history and alteration review and' counseling. Year: 85/91 SLVOTAL 98 7. HiZ`VkVUS MATERIALS PLAN /0RD NANCE: 12 Prepare revisions to General. Plan and Development Code in order to implement Hazardous Waste Plan. Year: 89/91 8. EXPANDED AIR QUALITY ELEMVT: Preparation and orocessing of an amendment: to the General Plan in response to City Council request to a more dmtaiied response to air ritality impacts and anticipated request from SCAG /AQMD for implemontation of the Regional G-owth Management Plan. Year: 89/91 Q— 1 24 PROGRAM ITk M 9. LAND USE AWD, DE140GRAPHIC DATA BA:,E: Monitoring and updating this program involves putting together in an organized fashion all available information on land use and demographics. The organization of this material and procedures for updating should be coordinated with the "Data; System Module" program. Year: 89/91 10. HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE: This project is mandated by State law for adoption,of a revised housing element, and to include Such new provisions such as emergency shelter and transportation. Year: 89/CO 11. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY: Assist Community Development with the preparaticis and materials for economic development conferences. i.e., IEW Conference and Business Expo. Year: 89/91 12. DESIGN AWARDS EXCELLENCE PROGRAM: Entails publicity, compiling a nomination list, taking photographs and work with Commission Jury to select recipients. Contract development and monitoring for name plates on award plaques. Year: 89/91 13. FTLLSIDE GRADING ORDINANCE: Develop a Code Amendment to establish an overlay zone for areas with slope of 10 percent or greater to provi& extensive grading policies for hillside areas. Year: 89/90 14. COMNTNIIY PROFILE: Update brochure. Year: 89/1 1(" P /WK S 10 31 20 S 4 6 f PROGRAM ITEM P /4(S 1l 15.. F110THILL /1 -15 FREEWAY P AUTIFICATION STUDY: 7 l_ Contract with Landscape Architect to prepare an inventory and develop a consistent wall /landscape treatment for both I -15 and the future Foothill'' Freeway p Corridor. Year: 89,190 16. SENIOR HOUSING ACTIVITIES: 12 Annual review and monitoring of senior projects under the City's SHOD provisions. Also monitoring and prep i. -i ng new DcWei opmer:t Agreements. Yp,ar: 89/91 17. ETIWAND -A NORTHI SPECIFIC PLAN & ANNEXATION 12 'i Contin.!e process fors developino conceptual planning framework for about 6000 acres between Milliken and San Sevaine Creek. Year: 89/90 PROGRAM ITEM P /;KS NEW � OR CONTINUED PROGRAM WE MUST ACCOMPLISH AND NEED MORE STAFF: 1. CEQA GUIDELINES UPDATE /MITIGATION MONITORING PROGP,AM: 84 Prepare and process an update to the City CEQA Guidelines and establish a mitigation ,ilan and monitoring program -or all EIRs and mitigated negativ declarations adcpted after 1/1189, The mitigation plans and monitoring are required by AB 3180 Cortese. Year: 89/91 2. SPECIAL PROJECTS: EO This is one area of responsibility that eludes a specific description and includes anything arld everything that does not fit anywhere else. Examples Include data management, litigation, "financial planning, growth forecasts, 4th Strrat Rock Crusher, the Regional Map, and responses to various "rushfires. Year: 89/91 w 3. ADVANCE PLANNING DATA SYSTEM MODULE: 44 Development in ranjunction with the Revenue Assessment Division, a coordinated system of Advance Planning data which can c,e regularly and routinely updated for both General plan and Special Project utilization. Year: 39/91 4. COUNTY PLANNING REFERRALS: 20 Monitor and comment on development proposals in the City's sphere of influence. such as the Rock Crusher, to assure consistency with City's policies. Must be able to respond to county's schedule. Year: 99/91 I S. GENERAL PLAN NOTICE REQUIREMEriT AWNDKNT: 4 Assembly Bill 4057 (Wright) requiras the mailing of notiflcation of property owners if any General P;an Amenot:,ant would affect the,.. "permitted uses or intensit .1, of uses of real property... ", thereby requiring the City to amend the Development Code accordingly. Year: 89/90 PROGRAM ITEM P/W S 6. SENIOR HOUSING (SHOD) SITE LOCATION AND DESIGN $ CRITERIA STUDWORDINANCE AMENDMENT Identify through Development Code Amendment appropriate site specific locations for SHOD projects, by the use of applicable land use criteria. Also establish unique design construction criteria for this special use group. Year: 89/90 0 i PROGRAM ITEM P /WKS PROGRAMS WE WOULD LIKE TU SEE XCOMPLISHED, BUT NEED MORE STAFF: 1. LANDSCAPE /IRRIGATION GUIDELIFF,S: Complt e fi,.ai draft from existing draft of landscape and irrigation design standards to implement water conservation. Final product to be patterned after Landscape /Irrigation Guidebook for the County of Venturd. Year: 89/90 2. ANTENNA REGULATION StUDY: 2 A study regbrding the City's satellite dl,"n and antenna regulations in response to various appeals for Minor Development Review and Variance applications. Year: 89/90 STREET N�.*v CHANGES: - g Revision of approximately 12 existing or proposed streets to reduce similarity named or confusing situations, whist, could affect public safet y responses. These revisions would involve hiring a consultant to provide -itaffing for the public review and staffin.n proces . Yeart S9 190 re. STREET NM11% ORD NANCE UPDATE: 5 Revise street naming guidelines to coordinate with 911 Emergeicy System. Year: 62/90 5. -STRATEGIC PLAN1IN4 PROGRAM: s Develop a grcup of in 0mation sources which will , monitor related rational, state and local items in order � to anticip -:tC needed changes to existing planning or Developmanle Code provisions. Year: 09/90 0 i V , zz PROGRAM ITEM P /WKS 6. VACANT LAND USE INVENTORY MAP: s Identify vacant /underutilized ,and by APN and land use designation in order to provide a mechanism for updating MIVEIR for General Plan, monitoring population projections and provide c needed public information document. Year! 89190 7. WATER AND SEWER DEFICIENCIES STUDY: 10 Prepare and process a ^rrport concerning the adequacy of the City -wide water ar.d sewer lines and facilities. This study may result in new program /s implementation and /or General Plan Amendment, which would require further staff time not currently budgeted. Year: 89/90 8. FREEWAY LOCATION NOTIFTCATIOK OF PURCHASERS - 6 SUBDIVISION CODS' AMENDMFk7 A City may elect under Senate 8111 2258 (C. Green) to require notification by a seller to a purchaser the location of any existing or future freeway within 2 miles of a subject lot. Year: 89/90 9. OLD ALTA LOMA SPECIFIC PLAN 21. The City General Plan identifies the steed for a Specific Plan for this area in order to revitalize and enhance the historic context of the Old Downtown of Alta Loma. Also the City Council has directed staff to prepare a feasibilit; and scope identification study in anticipation of preparing a Specific Plan. Year: 90/91 V , zz ■ CME Ems= ttC901T KRK PROGRAM SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 1989 -1991 P.13ected Shortage 10 60 *One riew position is being requested in F! 90/93, to Assist with tc a program., Note: Code Enforcement programs are not prioritized, as most scions are the result of complaints, In that sense, they are all Priority I. 89/90 90[91 PROGRAM ITEM STATUS P /aKS PAKS 1. Property Maintenance /Aesth(,6v; ongoing 45 60 2. Land Use /7'3ning G;;3oing 6 10 3. Sign Rege "ition Ongoing 47 65 4. Vehiele Parking and Storage Ongoing 35 40 S. Parking Control /Public Prop. Ongoing 12 17 6. Public Nuisance Abatement New/Changed 15 15 7. Animal Regulation Ongoing 10 10 8. Permite /Oevelopneiit Ongoing 20 20 9. Business Regulation Ongoing 4 5 10. Weed Abatement /Fire Wdzards Ongoi;;q /Contract 3 3 11. Vector Control OngoinglContract 3 3 12. Community /Wareness Ongoingi7xpanding M 8 Total Projected Person Weeks u r 256 total Available Persons Weeks 196 196 P.13ected Shortage 10 60 *One riew position is being requested in F! 90/93, to Assist with tc a program., Note: Code Enforcement programs are not prioritized, as most scions are the result of complaints, In that sense, they are all Priority I. n PROGRAM ZME EW- MCEAEIiT PROPOSED VORK PROGM FISCAL YEAR 1989 -1991 89/90 90/91 P /W<S P/WCS 1. PROPERTY MAINTENANCE /AESTHETICS: 45 60 Activities involving the maintenance and improvement of the aesthetic quality of the community. Includes upkeep of buildings, yard are 'as, landscaping and other improvements. Problem;. of outside storage and screening, care of parking lots and trash enclosures, accumulations of trash and debris. 2. LAND USE /ZONING: 6 10 Activities involving `Enforcement of the land use provisions of the Development Code. Includes illegal use of property, monitoring of non - conforming uses, reviewing the compliance with conditions of approval for use permits, and monitoring of development requirements for landscaping and parking. 3. SIGN REGULATION; 47 65 Activities reiatei to maintaining compliance with the City Sign Ordinance. Includes continuous monitoring, inspection, persmal contact and education of businesses, and removal of signs within the public right -of -way. 4. VEHICLE PARKING Am STORAGE: 35 40 Activities related to the control of vehicles on private property, with an emphasis on the type, size, quantity and appropriate location for parking and storage. Includes the storage of inoperative vehicles, commercial /oversize /overweight vehicles, recreational vehicles, lawn parking, vehicle repair in pudic view, and vehicle painting /overspray. PROGRAM 89/90 90/91 P/WKS P /WKS is S. PARKING CONTROL /PUBLIC PROPERTY: 12 17 Activities related to thA enforcement of parking violations on public sz,. -eels, parks, and public accoss areas including perking lots. Inc'tdes abandonee vehicles, oversize /commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles, unattached trailers, restricted residential streets, vehicles parked for sale or for advertising, and vehicles parked illegally a; private property. :ooperative enforcement and communication with the Sheriff's Office. 6. PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT: is is Activities related to the abatement c` conditions wni 0 are detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare when present on property within tho City. Includes fire hazards, pool/water security, unsecured vacant structures, accumulation of junk and refuse, inoperative vehicles, and other hazardous or nuisance conditions. a. ANIMAL REGULATION: 10 10 Activities related to animal problems: zoning violations, noisy anima's, san{tation related complaints, location of i i n ge Eeltaals, excessive numbers of animals, slauohttr of animals and hee keeping. Cooperative enforcement and communication with the contract animal control agency. 8. PERHITS /OEVELOPMENT: 20 20 Activities related to pecrait requirements for development and physical alteration of r zperty. Inrtades Minor Development Reviews, .tellite dish /antennae installations, sk.a'ceboa► ramps$ ^quipment screening, temporary uses /sales facilities In tracts, special events, recycling facilities, tree removal, etc. F �1)4 a, 89/90 r0 /91 PRt'LRAM ? /WS P /WS g. BUSINESS REGULATIONS: 4 g Activities related to the control of business operations which require specific approval based j on their location, type of activity, or transient nature. Includes home occupations, entertainment, roadside vendors, door to door solicitors, etc. Cooperativo 00fo:cm —mnt and communication with Ve. City's Gassiness Licaa5o Tex Division, 10. HEED ABATEMENTIFIRE HAZARDS.* Contract service provided by the San Bernardino County Department of Agriculture. County Fazard Abatement Officers identify fire Ward conditions related to weeds, tumbleweeds and combustible debris and reruire removal of cause abatement. Pmgram require.t coordination with the Cour:ty, information referrals and contract administration. 11. VECTOR CONTROL: 3 3 Contract servic;s provided by West Valley Vector Control for the control of flies, rats and mosquitos, The Victor Control Offico %^ pit -evides routine insecticide :,praying, responds o n quests and is involved with extensive public: �ntact especially during fly season. Program --quires coordination w "'i contract personnel, information referrals and ..1itract administration. 12. COM14UNITY AWARENESS: G g A proactive progra,:r intended to educate the public about City Regulo; 'ins and the objectives of the Code - nforce .t -, *. ogram. Inci udea articles in the Grapevine, public speaking, caamuaity meetings, participation in coriunEitw events, preparation of informational materials, correspondence: etc. KA e :-� yI / 0701-02 04-12-89 PC Agenda of 5 CODE ENFORCOUT BOOBET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989 -1991 CODE ENFORCEMENT WORK PROGRAM �rY 89/90 Available Resources: 1 Supervisor 3 Officers 28 person weeks*' 126 person weeks 1 Technician 42 person Weeks Total 195 person weeks CODE ENFORCEMENT WORK PROGRAM FY 90/91 Available Resources: 1 Supervisor 28 person weeks* 4 Officers 168 person weeks 1 Technician 42 person weeks Total 238 person weeks *Note: 1/3 of Supervisor time is dedicated to administration /propper„ development. Staff level for fiscal year 88/89 will be maintained for fiscal year 89/90. No additional staff is requested until fiscal. year- 90 /91-,•when an additional Code Enforcement Officer position has been requested. FY 89/90 would be directed toward continued refinement of the Code Enforcement Program, . The Development Code and other Municipal Code rernairements would continue t7 receive needed revision. Procedures would be developed to increase the effectiveness of existing staff resources and continue to increase proactive enforcement activities. We would see the increased involvement of the Planning Division clerical pool in supporting the Code Enforcement program. Support services would include clerical support, as well as involvement with communications, documentation and other office support services. The enhancement of support services would allow further development of the Code Enforcement Technician position and provide a realistic support base for the field personnel. FY 90/91 would be directed toward the comsnlete development of a proactive Code Enforcement Program. The transition from a reactive program will be based on the increased involvement of field personnel with the community. The added field officer is necessary to provide adequate coverage of the various residential and commercial districts, which will have grc -ar substantially. Petition: Clarification of the land use classification pertainin to building evatractors. Issue: Baild.ing contractors Stith office warehouse operations are being classified in with building contractors with outside storage yar-is and therefore prohibited from the IP -7 zone. The land Use Tyke Definitions Alstinguishes two categories of building contractors, and restricts their locations to General Industrial and Heavy Industrial zones. The two categories of contractors are: 1. Building Contractor's Offi4a and Yards - screened outside storage 2. Building CDutractor's Storage Yard - unscreened outs -,de storage The Planning Department has taken she position that s building contractor requiring only an office and warehouse for inside storage is con.-{tiered to be the same type of us.;• as the building contracto? with outside, storage. It is on the bash of this position that then have rsLused to grant business licenses to general and plumbing contractors at the trrow Business Center. This interpretation has Peen inconsistently applied however, since ;:he department has approved permits for three building contractors at the Arrow Industrial Condominiums which are in an IP-7 zone and just east of the Arrow Busin_ ,s Center. The attached photographs will show the locations of the three building contractors in the Arrow Industrial Condominiums. It is obvious that their use is not incompatible with a multi- tenant environment and that they have no adverse effe;t on the center. ot Pea U a.,\ttad i I R N ►P tP se 5 G\ Nt tro t7 < 9 cV \`m � a G d d fi t \P n e `� "i o 1 t 3 G .N G B NOSE G\ µa tp tt t2 e• , • o al OG �.RF��Y pE G\ G► d 5 • e • • s, `�� p Rte GNTUt4a N , \P Gt► 2 3 • e, � : '' i� � � ° � ° �e v \�� C Uag t1� • o m 8 �ZEG USE 5 J aaea5 e• • ; e : e e P N5\ Y �e� �' � ,� • � � • e VFpf,,CVg \N ��r��p¢f, � �° a ° y � ° • • ° • • nt So- VNZ. 40 u • • p • Ar a N \� E% �5 c® grit \6� o�a \lao�ta+ pCag & • at : •p ae g V` �Pq\.� ot.o . k•t I N k • t \ct St US ea�tF• o • dR 7 e• • o s \eR, Su0p11v o s" • e ° k e ° ' • s �pel+Mu suN c4 Sw SM", •\a'Ntca°t •& 10 � � e' � e ° k °t •° e+ le ino �Sa\ � 1 °a • e ® • a4dr !' k o R � k • �. i F a n * Vt-�ucP 9 %1 o� ate • 1 "s ®nRmPa t R gy a`• e ! • Po .40 P,°mt\ eeS e4 tq` \to � ±� Puat,O�\1�%oonn t \v e�g asc4 tSc et t SuPP Po tt t ac S fiea O ott•a, S%), PS•t d° •\` 1 ® °�Sa •° ¢ k • h k • • ga\ \d\ !g ° \ontlag So 'Aces ° e �► '} ar • • ° • 08u` au I'L Sett` ` v \cmg o x sir j ays \at° y SO Sam Soa st. �M � ap at iv bas \o6�8,� °°t\ Sa \e5 e'd \tsn ° & • b p • • GOO' to Rota °� Gott`aa`at °ts5'% %te ses� \c•' � ar k �� • -t � $ V ar } • e °' ar 6fl t6 • %9 g Vol „� & } SFr 4 k e • o 6o ao \v Sa\o ce S • • 'V & a ' • k Gxt `Food 1a•us• a Sa \ °6 r\c ®oata\e ° At it � k k • • dr ,Fl n$ayy 0, .4et o¢totYato' b R h ` • k at k Food .\ b G< fient S : �" • • ° e At fi � ®9aV \cmGat• S6�1c• � ® e x � } � e �, � �p � Jp t\►° �P a\d ca. y \ � N jB Nn o U \t \O* h & ° n' d g U Ic\t c ey S toaq • d oenoa\ So 0%$ • od t \Os e as P \\e ° • m ae p tceav� • e X PVo a M \r\a a 0 \`g vY � Qe \t OPe S• N Sri \G *c at \ N ea y y h \nci J sta \at G \Vn \.`aaUY et�t\l1to \aot ar a \ndastt\ FC \\aVe \ta\Q 0\10 G ear \cas G` Gea °a SOLO Gocta p \Y \ \tY y F ►aad a..00 ep \ \c a10tY fi�p\ p \sta\ Py \ \a yy pis® \Pat ""o FVa. • 1P �•t►av N CORRECTION JWM IF '% cu; KMREL;TIUN MA TABLE i!! -9 SUMMAPY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA • PERMITTED USE 'h' CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE NOTE: Nan - marked Uses Not Permitted USE TYPES Land Use* IP GI GI GI GI Gi IP IP 'GI '"' GI GI IP GI� GI HI 1P IP Subareas HO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 1607 MANUFACTURING Custom • • • • sk • • • o • • •. • a e Light • • • s e • ♦ • • • • e e • • Medium { ; • } •' • !jF i o ti Hea • Minimvy um ImpectHoavIt s9 • OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DESIGN & RESEARC _ Administrative & Oiftea i ♦ • .. ra . ,+ � • ♦ } • • Professlonal /Design Services 10, I f • + o • Researc Services • • o $ +a o • • • • • • WHOLESALE STORAGE & DISTRIBUTION Public Storage •} ¢. • •+. .+. • {, + • Light s • • • • • p • • • o 0 0 0 • • Medium e • e • • Heavy .;, e $ e COMMERCIAL Agricultural!Nureery Supplies & Services • • w s • • • Animal Care .+, i. .I. +, Automotive Fleet Storage .+• ♦ ♦ } Automotive Rental /Leasing • + + d i ♦ . /Light Truck Repair -Minor • } gAutomotive + * e e • o Automotive /Truck Repair -Major • ♦ • + • a + .+. Automotive Sales + ♦ .f, :. ,+, Automotive Service Station Je ♦ + $ .} .i. $ } + + $ Building Contractor's Office & Yards # t it , $ e 6 s a Building Contractor's Storage Yard • Building Maintenance Services a o • Building &Lighting Equipment Supplies&Sales • # • $ .+. • a # e ♦ ¢ e Business Supply Retail & Services • • * a • s o o • • • • • Business Support Services • e {, e o +. • • e ♦ .+ • • e • .+. • s Commm'deation Services • • ig a • • + . • • s + • a Convenience Sales & Services .E, i •+• # ♦ .+. .+. .j. .+. .I. .} .} . .+. .} .1. .+. Eating & Drinking Establishments • • e 41 e er • or e • e 4' e ® • Entertainment + .1. .+. .+. .+. ,+, .+. ,+, ,+, Extensive Impact Commercial T Fast Food Sales $ .E .+. + Q. + .+. .+. ♦ .+. .f, Financial, Inauranae & Real Estate Services • J& + • 0 e •+. 4, a e • Food & Beverage Sates .}. •1. {. ,I, $ .+. .I. } {. . .} .+. {. .+. {. .+. .} .} Funeral & Crometory Services 1 0 + .I. ,+, Heavy Equipment Sales & Rentals {. .} .+. + + 0 .j. ♦ e Hotel /Motel ♦ ad` • A • • • Laundry Services • • s o v • Medical /Health Care Service a ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ + + + .+. + o Personal Services ♦ ♦ .+. + ♦ ♦ .t. +1+ ♦ + + + Petroleum Products Storage 4 .+. + + ,gyp 4 Recreational Facilities .i. ♦ ♦ . ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • + I .t, .j. o • o s • Repair Services • • •+. • • • e • ♦ • • Scrap Operation ,+, CIVIC Administrative Civic Services" • • ® • e • o s • • o a • Cultural • t ♦ ♦ •+• + ♦ + + Extensive Impact Utility Facilities .+. Flood Control /Utility Corridor • • e a • • s o • a • Public Assembly .� ♦ ♦ .j. ♦ ♦ .+, ♦ i• Public Safety &Utility Services . .+. .} .+. .} {. .I. .+. .� ♦ . ♦ $ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Religious Assembly .+. ♦ .+. .+. + ± .+. 48 ,+, ,+, ,+, ,+, IP- Industriak Park GI- General industrial WHI.- Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial HO- Haven re. Overlay District HI -Heavy Industrial Automotive Sales: Activities typIcally include but not limited e, dfsplay, retail sale, or lease r , and used automobiles, minor automotive repair, autimotive body work, and installation of accessories. Automotive and Light Truck Repair-Minor- Activities Include, our. are not limited o, auta;no ive and light truck repair, the retail sale of goods and se;wices for automotive vehicles and light trucks (less than 6000 lb), and the cleaning and washing of automotive vehicles. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: brake, muffler and tire shops and automotive drive - through car washes. Heavier automobile repair such as transmission and engine repair are not included. Disabled vehicles shall be screened from public view. Automotive and Truck Re air - Major: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: heavy automobile and truck repair such as transmission and engine repair, the painting of automotive vehicles, automotive body work, and the installation of major accessories. Disabled vehicles shall be screened from public view. Automotive Service Station Activities typically Include, but are not limi to the sale from the premises of goods and the provision of service normally required In the day -to -day operation of motor vehicles, including the principal sale of petroleum products, the incidental sale of tires, batteries, replacement items, and lubricating services, and the performance of minor repairs, such as tune — r, tire change and brake work.. Building - Contractor ^offices and Yards: Activities typically nc u offices and storage of equipment, nwterials, and vehicles for contractors who are in the trades involving construction activities which include, but are not limited to, plumbing, painting, electrical, roofing, carpentry, and other services. Screening of outdoor storage is re wired as per Section IV, A.6. (Storage Area /Screening. Building Contractor's Storage Yard; Activities include THE maintenance ana outdoor storage of large construction equipment such as earthmoving equipment, cranes, and outdoor storage of building materials in an unscreened,manner. III -12 ` a � � � � .. . � � 11 � � \ � IV-47 � k � \ ! � - - �A ƒU 3.5 � § }#&. m -�•� \§ § |J \ LC �7 j ■ � I� \ a �s �� q| g" � i Arrow Industrials Condominiums 10722 Arrow Route Zoning: Industrial Park — 7 NAME HTI CONSTRUCTION ADDRESS 10722 ARROW ROUTE, SUIT:' 102 BUSINESS GENERAL CONTRACTOR VIEW OF FRONT ENTRANCE OF UNIT' NANE PICONE PLUMBING CORP. ADDRESS 10722 ARROW ROUTE, SUITE 114 BUSINESS PLUMBING CONTRACTOR VIEW OF FRONT ENTRANCE OF UNIT U. INANE `ADDRESS 10722 ARROW ROUTE (BUSINESS nIFW OF FULL VIEW OF 10722 BUILDING WHERE HTI COiNSTRUCTION AND PICONE PLUMBING ARE LOCATED NAME ADDRESS 10722 ARROW ROUTE BUSINESS VIE:•( OF REAR VIEW OF 10722 BUILDING WHERE BOTH THE GENERAL AND THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR HAVE SUITES is NAME ROSS TOURVILLE CONSTRUCTION ADDRESS 10722 ARRC. ROUT:, SUITE 216 BUSINESS GENERAL CONTRACTOR VIEW OF FRONT ENTRANCE OF UNIT NAME ROSS TOURVILLE CONSTRUCTION ADDRESS 10722 ARROW ROUTE, SUITE 215 BUSINESS VIEW OF FULL VIEt+1 OF BUILDING WHERE ROSS TOURVILLE IS LOCATED N ROSS TOUVIVILLE CONSTRUCTION :SS 10722 ARROW ROUTE BUSINESS VIW, Gf REAR VIEW OF TUB BUILDING DERTND ROSS TOURVILM CONSTRUCTION NASE ADDRESS BUSINESS VIEW OF