HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/05/10 - Agenda Packet B,9 P agenda
a
I
CITY OF
RANCHO CLr-NNKXNK;A
PLANNING COMM.ISSUN
4, AGENDA
1977 WEDNESDAY MAY 10,1989 7:00 a.m.
LIONB:PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
9161 BaSR LINE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA
L fledge of AlleWance
IL RoU can
Commissioner Blakesiey Commissioner Emerick
Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel
Commissioner Tolstor
III. Announcements
IV &Pproval of Minutes
Adjourned Meeting of April 6,1089
April 26,1989'
Y. Consent Calendar
The fallowing Consent Calendar items ara pected to be routine and
non-oontroverslal. They will be acted on by file Commission at one
time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it
should be removed for d*uss on.
A. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13114-NORDIC-A
21 custom lot subdivision on 5.5 acres of land nn the I
Residential District(2-4 dwelling units per acre),lq�dated at the
southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Cabe Del :°ado-APN:
208-921F`_'S&04. ,
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVE'"OPMENT REVIEW
88-43 - BARASCH ARCHITECTS - The development of one
industrial building totaling 30,300 square feet on 1.78 acres of d
land in the Qeneral Industrial Mtriet(Subarea 5),located at the
northeast, corner of Sharon Circle, east of Hermose,i Avenue
APN: 209-261-24.
C. MODIFICATION TO DESIGN REVIEW 11626 BRIMAR, The
request to modify an approved site plan by substituting approved
Plans 3 and I on Tots 81 ar6`tl,,:respectively,located on the north
vS side of Almond Streets east of Beryl Avenue-APN: 1061-821-21
22.
D. TIME EXTENSION POR COND1T ONAL USE PERMIT 86-04
JIr _DER-;A development for truck rental,lease,snd sales on 4,23
'$eres of lend 14,the Genoml,incktstrial District(Subarea 14,)of the
14dustrial Specific Plan, located on the west side of.Santa Anita
Avenue,north of 4th Street-APN, 229-331-06.
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMB",tT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
53-44 - BARASGH ARCHnECTS - We development of 3
< industrial buildings totaling 70,45$ square feet on 3.79 net f('*res ,
of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea'Z);T10eated
south of 9th Street between Lion Street and Hellmatn Aventl�-;;Il.
APX-209413-24. ±
P, VARIANCE 89-04-COMMEPCIAL CARRIERS-A Resolution of
denial of a R7quest to reduce'-1Re Parking setback from 25 feet to
feet and the laudseape setback from 36 feet to 8 feet for 12
aeres of land in the Minimum impact/heavy Indust-rial District
(Subarea 9), located on the south side of Jeryley Boulevard,
between Utica and Vincent Avenues-APN.-209-143-07,08 Z��09. j
G. '41NOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 67-71 ,?- COMMERCIAL
CARRIERS - A Resolution of denial of a request to.grade and
pave approximately 12 acres of land for an existing site wiWa the
Minimum"Impact/Heavy,�yustrial DistAot tSubarea 9),located on
the south side of Jersey Boulevard, between Utica and Vincent
Avenues-APN-.209-143-07,08&09.
VL Public Hastings �
{
The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals I
rstay voice their aplrlion,of 0p. related project. please wait to be �
recognized by the Chaiftan uW address the-Commission by stating
your name and address. ;All such opinions shall'be limited to S minutes
per i►tdividual for each project, l
H. ENVIR:ONMENTA1 ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL j
MAP 12058-BAttASCH ARCHITECT'S A,Subdivision of 3.79 net
aet�s of land iAtcc 3 .paree:3 in-the Industrial District
(Subarea'l'),located south of Sgl*'Street between Lion Street and
Hellman Av(Inue-APN. 209-('t3-24.
L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 89-07 ADAME - The request to establish a second
dwelling runt on a single family lot in the Very Low ReMential
District (0-2 dwelling units per acre), located at 6254 Galloway , j
Street-APN: 1061.061--10.
J, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP 1221R- HIX DEVEEOPMENT-A sUblivision of 9.25 acres of
T@-into- parcels In the Low Residential Deirelopinent District,
located on the east side of Hellman Avenue,south of 19th Street-
APN.- 202-061-36)39#3c 40.
K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MUNICIPAL COD
AMENDMENT CITY?OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Various r)
amenUvats to 7itle�IS, the 5tbdivision Ordinance, regarding
appeal periods,approval periods,and extensions,
M Old Business
VIIL ' flew Badness
L. HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT 89-`35.- DOLAN -An appeal of
' sta f's.decision to deny a Home Occupation Permit fora multi-
track recording studio located in the 'Law. 'Density Residential
District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) at e292 Arrow Roche -
APN: 209-361.-1:9.
' IK. D1mtok11j: Rep#r;s
M. HA?'ARDOUS'WASTE MANAGEMENT
N. CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR A THREE-ACRE PARK LOCATED ON.
A CUE AWRE, SOUTH OF BASE LIFE ROAD IN THE
RE—D BILL AREA
X. Commission Business
XL Public Comments ~}
This is the time and,,place j'or.the general public,to address the
Commission. Items to be discusser', hero are those which do not
already appear on this agenda.
XA. Adjournment
77he Plarming Cammissiort has adopted Administrative,Regulations that
;Vet an11 p.m. adjournment three. If items go beyond+,hat time,they
§hall be heard only with the consent of the Commission.
I y,
VICINIT�1'1, MAP
.�.`.�.� .�._ t .., �..�..».............«..�...y ram..,,,, «.,..,�
t rj
i
t i
} ,�r�.s ti`„+�."""•swan 1�� e
W # t
C
.• CHAFF9V t�
Br�v f Caf.ciat t a
�31�'� � �iF3 W 9R lIGS A!� r�3i�t»�� YbeMg7M�N y+ lCH9W
g e
t�rl♦ Lf�aM 1RRR Cr1r�gA4t
Rrrow OL 1�a Y gtTolMy :t.
'. a •'`r.,e...��
sue�aasaA-auAsr+ cauwrr n croeue 0eir
aarARin Ila1#4110 rtstUt Arirsoxr
Crry OF RANCHO CUCAMOWM
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Aft SICAF ' REPORT
DATE: May 10, 1985
TO: aairma
n and Members of the Planning Commission: I�
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner "
BY: Cindy Norris, Ass,13ant Planner
SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSY"s'FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13114 NORDCC. A 21
cus o�m To�",4u i V1 son on 5.5 acres FF landfii-the Low
Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per
acre), located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue
and Calle 0el Pr£do - APN: 208-921-03 & 04. 1
I'. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13114 was originally approved by the
17ann-ing commission on May 14, 1986 and was subsequently extended
to May 14, 1989. -0n August 24, 1988, a't',tal Development/Design
Review Application was approved. The_9pplicant has requested an
additional twelve month extension in order to al.ow time to record
the final map. According to Development Code (Section 17.OZ.100)
extensions on approvals may be granted in twelve month i=tnents,
not to exceed a total of five years from the original date of
approval.
II. ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the proposed time extension for
con ormance-with the current Development Code. Based upon this
review, Staff has determined that the project meets the standards
for residential development for the Low Residential District (2-4
dwelling units per acre) and that the map is in compliance with
the goals and objectives of the General Plan.
III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve a one year time extension for Tentative Tract 13114
through adoption of the attached resolution.
Res 'ly su d
Bra Bu er
City Hoer
BB:CN:sp
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization
Exhibit "B" Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "C" - Site Plan
Resolution
t
ITEM A
l
zx 11,
1
i :L�fPq(yYPy,.,t
' 4•*141
f !•I�I4LL FAflLLY 3
xw KILL
CbMMWi Y rpmG
i j�` !s�aiAtm�a<ik�nv tw�,tt�Xtrcat„ r'
NORTH
CITY OF
I .
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - rTLE:
PIANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALE:
C
Original Poor Quality
I
i
L
} 1
?OR. LYLAJAOWAA vi"11AAD l IWACT, i*t G• ♦�
LOW
PO
�� �� `Gig--- .w. ..�... {r.- �..�— � `.4~.. 'T� ter.�tl//•-K M� .l. 1(
ta"hh"`11 c f Zvi • Y \ \ }y�r
A64 U 110 19 '
y low-
NORT11
Imo' OF ITEM:
RANCHO CUCAMCN A TI`x LE: 2'i-MC
PLANNING DIVISION UXIBIT-.— L .,scALE
a
Original Poor Qgiplity
is
�� ` � is a• ��r,�I��`i �.. t�� �� y �* ":�
1 S �` ; S � E _s fQ i ` �y Ajy 'Ss• +R,.� ;— —•
CITY OF, ITEM:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE
PLANNING DIVISION q~� EXRIIITe sC�L
Amok
RESOLUTION>'40.
A F:SOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APP.;6VING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. '13114
- APN: 208-921-03 b 04, ANC MAKING FI NOI NGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
(i) C.P. Lange Engineers has filed an application for the extension
of Tentative Tract No. 13114 as described in the title of this Resolution..
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred
to as "the application".
(ii) On May 14, 1986, this Commission adopted itr Resolution
No. 86-51, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits,
Tentative Tract No. 13114.
(iii) till legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
L. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City,of Rencho Cucamonga as follows,
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of th£ facts
set forth in the *Recitals, Past A, of This Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission,
including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically,
finds as follows:
tat The previously approved Tentative Map is in
substantial compliance with the City's current
G:-neral Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans,
Codes and Policies; and
(b) The extension of the Tentative Map will not cause
significant inconsistencies with;the current General
Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and
Policies; and
(c) The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to
cause public health or safety problems; and
(d) The extension is within the time limits prescribed-
by state law and local ordinance.
`j
PLANNING COMMIrSION.RESOLUTION NO.
TENTATIVE TRACT°13114 SCHULTZ
May 10, 1989'
Page 2
y)
3. , Based upon the, findings and conclusions spy forth in parag;-aphs
1 and 3 al"gve, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for:.
Tract Applicant Expiration
131Ik Nordic/C. P. Lange May 14, 1990
4. The Secretary to this Commission shalt certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTQ THIS IOTH DAY OF MAY, 1989.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
F'. : a rman
ATTEST;
ra U er, SRretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City'of Rancho
Cl-1camonga, do hereby certify thwt,the foregoing Resolution was. duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and: adopted by the planning Commssion of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 10th day of May, 1989, to the following vote-to-wit;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS';
NOES: COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS;
I
5 `I
l
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STA IFF REPORT � I
DATE: May 10, 1989
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner
BY: Cindy Norris
SUBJECT: ENVIROMMUTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-43
e aevelopment of one industrial
u ng 'totaling 30,300 square feet on 1,78 acres of land
in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) located at
the northeas4 corner Sharon Circle, east of Hermosa Avenue
- APN: - 209-261.24.
i. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration �
8. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning
North - Vacant,, Subarea 5, General Industrial
South - Vacant; proposed industrial building Subarea 5,
General industrial
East - San Bernardino County Flood Control and an existing
warehouse building•, Subarea 5, General Industrial
West - Vacant; proposed industrial building, Subarea 5,
General Industrial
C. General Plan Designations:
Project Site General Industrial
North - General Industrial
South - General Industi al
East - General Industrial
West General Industrial
D. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant with an
approximate slope of 2% from north to south. The site is
bounded to the east by the Deer Creek Flood ContrO Channel
while to the north and south is vacant land, and to the west,
a single industrial building is under construction.
I'PEbI S
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF-REPORT
DR 88-43 BARASCH_ARCHITECTS
may 10, 1989
Page 2
E. Parking Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type SquamN Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footap Ratio Required Provided
Office 1,500 1/250 6
Manufacturing =-42,500` 1/500 45
Warehouse y6,300 111000 6
Total 30,100 ST 54
(12 bicycle spaces) 3
57
II, ANALYSISs
A. General: This project is intended to be developed as a
specu a ive industrial building primarily for a manufacturing
use. The proposed use and building design are consistent witii
standards and requirements for Subarea 5. The propo;7ad
architectural treatment is consistent with adjacent approved
buildings and utilizes a combination of smooth painted panels.
with recessed horizontal accent panels and a light sandblasted
base. Following the issuance of a Negative Declaration, the
City Planner will issue approval subject to recommendations of
the Design Review Committee,
E. Design Review Committci: The Committee (Chitiea, Blakesley
anColeman reviewed the project on April 6, 1989 and
recommended approval_subjee4 to the followings
i
1. Relocate the i�. ployee lunch plaza to the northwest corner
of the site an4 locate the trash enclosure and transformer
adjacent to U a loading area,
2. Recess the rectangular accent details on the west, south
and east elevations. The blue accent color is to be added
to these recesses on all but the north end of the east
elevation.
3. Raise and recess the reflective glass treatment at the ;1
entry,
4. Provide a painted, recessed, rectangular detail above the
enhanced glass entry area.
a,. 4 5.
PLANNING COkMISSIOWSTAFF REPORT
OR 88-43 - BARASCH ARCHITECTS
May 10, 1989
Page 3
5. Provide a decorative screen wall adjacent to the dock area
.along the east elevation,
6. Captinue the sandblasted band on all elevations and the
screen wall,
7. Provide a 5 foot landscape strip at the southeast corner
r of the site.
I
The applicant has worked with Staff to revise the elevations
consistent with these recommendations, as illustrated in the
attached exhibits.
C. Technical Review Committees The project was reviewed and.
conaltionally approve y Ere Technical Review Committee on
April 4, 1989,
0. Environmentaf Assessment: Part 1 and 2 of the initial study
ave can comp el ed and no significant impacts have bFen
identified.
III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
ssu�N®yatilve Declaration through minute action.
Respectful'ty submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:CN:sp
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhib•?t "C" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "0" - Conceptual Grading
Exhibit "E" Elevations
+ t
1
� T cnrc
I Xh
I � SMrorc Gic4i„
10 -- I.S.P
{n. dhare3
'IR!1t Gky tf.ibieKkGwv«ya�
Ib!NI 8'�CK.Ssf1'
NOTE
CITY OF ITEM.
PLANNING DIVISION 43 -q EXHIBIT:-AL SCALE:
original Poor Quality
y � lllvY,l � +111
k7i
t _
SHARCN CIRCLE LL
LLJ..� Z/Z>KlY1J"f5•Tt•"'. �lfaeCU�
1
1
i
KlrO•�•L}f n tisr'NS
N O I
(kTY OF ITEM:,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: r,6 .
Original Poor Quality
LEGEND
4AErCT YRCE lh4;ei',.y�toT'lf[3t �/l1lY�j AtEfJ61t4L1� ��
20 a-I111 LVdG.(AWOLS.f S�MavS 1WlJ'NY�/ktllw'
El'Boa
elRm
'iQil>�YV I/N/rlef>
Is
® El9/tdAp�sYli..rII/Lt IR[L
fI•!Ac
i
�� *'AWAY r c�
waevJr o.s'Leer,wuuo.>nra;.�tc✓u•m+ofaww,.u�J.vfwt
A&M JLL hWJ�w9 JfGJt17 AELD4S J/U[lYJY1WIITY iA6iinW/fYffEV •
»MfJ.ilfa,LB Aa9wM0�f9 vr�'_ '
/Mr>wyp,iM 7rS>l.eajbJR+>.It
n�a..,e wr f�>t lRowafo.A �a�yyr.ma..++� .. Y �•
L
_Acr�t w Cd,.ef•IIOPJs
r+uN Mfrs iX ariaf!
suvxe�s..ter,rC sErr+t
Y CWArYAta ��V i .9'LJ1/Le4d4BG ll�fJ?'
TY OF
ITEM.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'TITLE;
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT..�2-SCALE: ,w.
Original Poor Quality
R
0
L_J s
qp
SHAAW-'RCLC
+I Extba�,E�rw+rf .0.,cy
(Wo.n/) .. 8• �. 1. £rnn l.vr i.Ons�
00. is ELZ
'hai,puuAr�
m+4„adWAa„ ,w,t
YmRrMM�qIppyy.�� M�,,y�V,,��(f M,WEq
iiWOMOVOG' PAM
ar.� G••tisy �F �,�e.say
NORTH
)CITY OF 11
ITEM:
I
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TxTLZ: ag 60400
r
PLANNING DIVISION IO G^ 7 EXHIBIT:4D.SCALE:
Original Poor QrE 41ty
t....«.._--NIDALYfD LDca M
- RDC!'ra NY.A,a C.bMfft.1tt tfCYO.Y
11.140 iIEC140 NWSd/IAL NNE[S TfrNGILI
J �^MNtrt bb[tV
LINEN ROpl N10Np I
` L S01lTN
UNOUASl:oUdtlfA.ALL= —SpEEN NEL4
!'/E'NDRf10b1EL ACLU!Af4[LNW.
-----------
A fad _
NORTH
I
i
I
I
I
I /EtNI(u Mtcti!/D NOAIrDNlR[MNt[d litNCAlI—.••
f/N/tO IILAtfNG L,
kwfd Mmtfrnf� t
1l1
UCN!$ANDtLA7/tAft Jirl.MR Rtt:.vrwrit,.
r ASELECfm OLUt•EYrbY E1GltAAIWf
al r.YWRIttWtAL Af�Mr N11L[Nri
EDalr►AtL
EAST
CIS OF ITEM:
RANCHO �TCAMONGI TIT .
PLANNING DIVISION G- 9 ma: sCALL
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:• May 10, 1989 `-
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: MCDIFICATION TO DESIGN REVIEW 11626 - BRIMAR - The request to
modT'fy an approvea site plan by sus ui—�,g approved Plans 3
and 1 on Lots 81. and 82 respectively, located on the north
side of Almond Street, east of Beryl Avenue - APN: 1061-821,-
21 6 22.
I. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting modification to the
approved-site plan regarding unit placement for Lots 81 and 82 for
ne above-referenced tract.
11. BACKGROUND: The Design Review, for Tract 11626 was approved by the
anP] n nag Cortmission on March 23, 1988. At that time, the,site
AMh plan was also approved which indicated the placement of specific
floor plans for each tot.
III. ANALYSIS: The applicant originally requested re-platting for Lots
78, 81 -and 32 along the north side of Almond Street. It was
requested that Lot 78 be changei from Model 2 to Model 1, thi;t Lot
81 be changed from Model 2 to Model 3 and that Lat 82 be changed
from Model 3 to Model 1. The applicant requester the change since
Plan 1 is selling better than either Plan 4 or 3. The Deign
Review Committtee (Emerick, Mc Niel, Kroutil) reviewed the re
plotting on April 6, 1989 as a Consent Calendar item and did not
approve it, primarily because,4 out of the 6 lots located on the
north side of Almone Street, would be Plan 1. In addition, three
Plan 1 elevations would be located directly next to one another at
the novtheast -;Garner.
The applicant is now requesting re-plotting for Lots 81 and 82 .
only; They wish to substitute Plan 3 for Plan 2 on Lot Ell and
Plan 1 for Plan 3 on Lot 82. Plan 1 is a one-story unit while
Plan 3 is two stories. The difference iit elevation between the
one and two-story Wels is approximately 2, feet.
The unit mix along the north side of Almond Street would then
consist of three Plan 1, two Plan 3 and one Plan 2 elevations,
which is in substantial conformance w:_ :,Ae approved unit mix on
that street.
im�ai c _.
i
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RE: MOD. TO DEESIGN REVIEW 11626 BRIMAR
May 10, 1989
Page 2
IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommenr"s that the Planning Commission
modify the site plan approval to-allow Plan 1 to be placed on Lot
82 and Plan 3 to be placed on Lot '81.
Resp uily it d,
B d 17e
Cit tanner
BB:BN•ko
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Tract Map
Exhibit "BR Revised:Site plan
Exhibit 'IC" - Building Elevations
Resolution No. 88=5
Resolution of Approval
i;
�f
l
C _�
`s*•• � 4• •�'� Hl.+ems :�. a ..�j
e..� s� .yam [�{'z'' •� t ►' t t • °%`•
,a � i } �� 'fib �(�=��YY ry-•i-�t ,;"`1..�'FfFYr�:•'i�`.� �j '! '..
� v
Jak
•3
, Original Poor Quality
r � J
=y ! p i '
i':�i.:� w t ,1„+r•. l.. - c i�•'�7 t' ,.�. r
lit It
cl
i ; G�`11�a2(� NIfIDl1C.A71l�lt!
RANCH CUCAMONGAT[TLE= TRl3G 14'1f-t p
PLANNING D[VEDV EXHIBTt' A ,._..S+'. ALE'
Qrigi_lal Poj:• Quality
Ailk
_-._/J/. ''�':1�'�;�`�' SI t�y�`J• \\�.- -_"'•ate +,^
�Zpg
b
CITY OF ITEM- DP— 11&?-&-MVD H—,. s 1-1
RA H C TI LE: 617 aRN
PLANNING MUN EXHIRT-.- SCALE,
G_Y
� -'_=-� ors%'_..,:,��,•"-'�^.-.!% (`�� '�""z..�l�jt'C:.�
LU #C
■1f(��7i� �L�� �r���q.��i(�IT�t+��,,���■yry ��I`` '���,'",�,a •�.,,�u���,�� ��•..
t r t, ',.,•�.(;S moj.i�i ��t. ,aim(enfi3'l!/°Pa,`iuf1�, ir7unt tt pun r'°
ass{. t �k5 ---—s
All
;,. .• 1
'_►7�"—'(-��1—lei—rat'_
�•�,--�,,;;r�-,`-car w}-=
Y�
In
��i�0 ■ �'i.`in �7�1,1 9�YY 1�1 s�}3(S C c, �i� A T-ii.�n �. ��.r
# a U 1Nil 11111111111 _ If��N'�°"�' t\ �•:'}', <,.r,�t,�►�1j'��+, f-
•�O�r� V V� �I O01`li� �jr�'ty�� �:��lc) f J'cs1'�I�rG��r�a�' ,S�
- .. °q��i! ,mil �-�•+��.''if�'tS'a��a�.jaFIP41pi sw T
ti:
sue-
iMe 11��f�'. •� �f#{_f 1,L � '�. ss. �h ����`���-'�' t!k' .:s..irs`r..(�(�
Iui♦ flit 1 �� �cx't�-,ii
• 1`fi��1 B� � n� 1�7 f'19•ytf iS 1�..J'If".f�i..� i i t�i'':�'i�1 w
si �" wfl��t��+1�i Yr�+•�` �� t! l'`�.,.J' 1 ��1• fb... �'� �msw M.++�.".�'�L T� '..
!'-��� � ���I�r'!1ljlt,��,Rs4 ' � �� �._���� r�:• F I ��r]yl I�)u�
i �• R41 T.iS 1�r � �Y7 tl
�"J ° •:�_ .����., }a�. • ° �.'.��'��� of� ��I�f
(?{l)�6 •IIR+_:a�sd�5iir�°tia i :����sf 11� � �r:'�,ir��c��� �
�. � r■ r,rr. !i Yr f'■� �.. Sr . Z _ ice•
irrYarf�t� vt 7 u,o t'p -
I,�fu :ugly Yllili� Yl�-.� s�i/�l► ._-.. q�♦♦ ^'��
•
,.��►�1ii111�I���L�I�►►t,,t:l���Ili����� -� f�,���-, 1��,�a♦
r..i .]4.•,.�.^f--��^--��.—• •..� ,JAM,.a.
'' �k!�ti�e�� ,; +,+'� �`!+ ��t1iYlt��wri�liYa���"x', �aR •,-��
'd,�=� laaa(•li "�.,�}1 1Fai jJil QLI:•`�:'c'$tr '� .CM.z �;—'•�.
_ ti YaY l
RESOLUTION NO. 88-54
RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR LOTS 37, 38, 40, 41, 43-50
A.4D 72-82 OF TRACT 11626 FOR `4E DEVELOPMENT OF 23 SINGLE
FAMILY LOTS LOCATED NORTH OF ALMOND STREET AT BERYL
STREET IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIALDISTRICT (LESS THAN 2
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) DISTRICT APN: 1061-811-12-16 AND
10661-821-3, 4, 6, 7, 9-22
A. Recitals.
(i Brimar Development has filed an applicaton for the Design Review
of 'Lots 37,38,410,41,43-60 and 72-82 of Tract No. 11626 as described in t1he
title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is
referred to as "the application",
(ii) On March 23, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City-9f
Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites `.:o the adoption of this Resolution,
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE', it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows.,
1. This Con,nission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced greeting on March 23, 1988, including written and
oral staff reports, this `CoA -4fon hereby specifically rinds as follows:
A. That the proposed project is consistent with the
objectives of the General Plan; and {
B. That the proposed design is in accord with the
objective of the Development Code and the purposes
of the district in which the site is located; and
C. That the proposed design is in compliance with each
of the applicable provisions of the Development
Code, and
D. That the proposed design, together with the
conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the p\rblic health, safety, or
welfare, or materially njurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
C _ 7
f jy I
planning Commissi „Resolution No. 88-54
TT11626
March 23, 1988
Page 2
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph l
and 2 above, this Commissie hereby approves the application subject to each
and every condition set forth below and in th3 attache. Standard Conditions
attached hereto- and incorporated herein by this reference.
(1) approv approving Tentative Tract conditions
11626 shall apply.Resolution 83-95
(2) Lots 37,38, 40, 41, 43, and 82 sha1.1 have slope
stablilizing devices installed prior to occupancy
release. The design shall be approved by the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of grading or
building permits.,
(3) Lots 41 and 43 shall have rolled entrances, with a
minimum of 2 foot elevation above the flog line, or
as approved by the City Engineer.. The front yards
shall be graded to provide a positive barrier for
flood runoff Jumping the curbs,
(4) All existing curb cuts along the lot frontages that
are not to be used as driveways shall be removed and
replaced with standard curb and gutter.
(5) All
necessary to eliminate erosion trails shall be regraded and repaired
problems.
as
(6) The Community Trail throu&, Lots A and B shall be
constructed prior to occupancy. Public Improvement
plans for this Community Trail shall be submitted.
and, approved, prior to the issuance of building
permits, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
and the Trail Advisory Cormittee. The trail design
shall address the poter.1al for erosion in the area
of the channel.
(7) Carry each house.
hi e detailing around- the side
elevations
4 The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the
adoption ei this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAV OF MARCH, 1988.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
y
uza a yea, airman
ATTEST:
a u r, a ty ecretary
C - "
Planning Comnissi{'-Resolution No 88-54
TT11626
.March 23, 1988
Paga 3
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Sccretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning: Comission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning. Commission, held
on the 23rd day of March, 1938, by the fallowing. Note-to-wit:
AYES COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEP.,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: VNE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCHIEt TOLSTOY
I
i
- f
RESOLUTION NO. 88-54A
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMO..NGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING RESOLUTION NO.
88-54 CONDITIONALLY APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR LOTS 37,
38, 40, 41i 43, 50 AND 72-82 OF TRACT 11626 FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF 23 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS - APN: 1061-821-21
b 22, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.
(i) Brimar Development has filed a request to modify the appproved
site plan for Lots 81 and 82 of the Design Review of Tract No. 11626 as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the. sUbSect Design
Review request is referred to as "the application"
(ii) On May 10, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption-of this. Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
Ask NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the,.City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of thi,- Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting on stay 10, 1989, including written and
oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows
1) That the proposed project is consistent with the
objectives of the General Plan; and
2) That the proposed design is in accord with, the
objective of the Development Code and the purposes
of 'e district in which the fie is Located;; and
3) ofatthee aproposed plicable cabl a esign is in provisions o f compliance
cthe Deve opmant
Code; and
C -\U
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-54A
RE: MOD, TO DESIGN REVIEW 11626
May 10, 198
Page 2
qP
4) That the proposed destpn, tq-:,ther with the
conditions applicable thereto, ` will not be
detriaientaf to 'the public health. safety, or
welfare, or materially, injurious to prop„sties or,
improvements in 'ihe vicinity.
3, Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby modifies Resolution No, 88-54 by adding
the following conditions
8) plan l shall be located on Lot $2 and Pl i;o 3 shall
be located on Lot 81.
4. The Secretary to this Commission stall certify to t!`>e adoption
of this Resolution»
APPROVID AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH SAY OF MAY$ 198E
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RA14CHO CUCAMONGA
8Y:
Larry e , hu rman
!V SSTs
Brad u er, SErenry
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing_Resolutioit was duly and
regularly lntrodaced, passed, and zdopted by the Planning CA mission of thy:
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at A regular meeting of the Planning Commission heTa
on the 10th day of thy, '989, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: SSIONERS;
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ARL
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM,ONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 10, 19R9
TO: Chairman and Rimbers of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant. Planner
iUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-04 - RYDER -
Me I opment for truck ren a I, eaFe, an sa es on 4.23
acres of land in The General 10kistrial District
(Subarea 14) of the Industrial Specific Flan, located on
the west side of Santa Anitc Avenui�, north of 4th Street -
Af N: 229-331-06.
t
I. BACKGROUND: This project was originally approved by the Planning
ommtss an on April 22, 1987. The initial two year approval for
Conditional Use Permit 86-04 would have expired on
April 22, 1989. On April 17, 1989, the applicant requested this
Item be granted a one year time extension. The Planning
Commission may grant up to three years of extension, in
twelve-month increments.
II. ANALYSIS: The project is consistent with the Industrial Spe'_.fic
Plan and the General Plan.- The project will not be detrimental to
the adjacent properties or cause significant en+rironmental
Impacts. The proposed site plan and building design, together
with the previously approved conditions, are in compliance with
the Industrial Area Specific Plan and City standards. Should the
applicant propose ' any+ changes to the approved plans, a
modification to the development review would be required.
Staff notes that we are currently pr;cessing a new application,
CUP 88-41, that includes this project site and the corner property
below it. CUP 88-41 is a larger Ryder operation project:
II III. RCCOMMENDATZ^": Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve a Une year time extension for Conditional Use Permit
86-04 through adoption of the attached Resolution.
Re fully � t
I
Bra ller
City planner
88:CK,sp D
;LANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT-
CUP 86-04 - RYAER
May 10, 1989 1
Page 2
Attachments; Exhibit "A" - Letter Applicant - April 17, 1989
Exhibit "S" - Location Map,
Exhibit "C" - Site Plan/Landscape
Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations
Resolution' No. 87-6G - CUP 86-04
Resolution of Approval
i
i
Pitcssi`Dal�►sU
April 17, 1989
f P�tet,J.Pitessi,.4,IA.
ll Architect
Ms. Cynthia Kinser NolnDalmau.al.a
Il Assistant Planner Architect
Community Development Department
Planning Division.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
f Subject; CUP 86-04
Ryder Truck Rental Facility
Santa Anita Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
I
Dear Ms. Kinser:
i
On behalf of Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. we are requesting a
twelve month extension to tho above referenced project.
This Conditional Use Permit was approved by the Planning
Commission April 22, 1987 and would expire lftpril, 2.2, 1989.
Cynthia, as you know, we are currently in the process of CUP
83-41. Since thie. application has yet to be approved, we
would like to keep current the former conditional Use
Permit. Please let th?.s letter serve as an application for
extension.
If you should need any additional information regarding this
extension, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerel ;
Pit si Dal u rc tect
Al 'n Dalmau. A A.
Arc itecst
AD:sgd
cc: Joseph Leone, Jr., Ryder Truck;"Rental, Inc.
Paul J. Kalvaitis, P,E., Ryder, Truck Rental, Inc.
9267 Haven Avenue Suite 270 +22oncho Cucamonga,CA 91730 + (714)980-1361
j•' 3
j t
• T
M
� T
•
a
i
i
\<Al
Original Poor Quality
v - 4 4 —w� _�d Id s sa_Iti� ri..�»�a 'wr.a v— .♦ .j j.. ��
�. �.15i1 r� « '� T—=-� I��` a �i`' g � i i i �eE F '� • f�� .III
1• 4� 1 ! _ e a
j- — i -Y. 1
I4Z ,
Iiww
INO RT
II CITE' OF iTEND 41/p 'C
RANCHO CUCA2 At
PLANNING DIXIISIO.N EXHIMT- SCALE;
D -5'
00ginal Poor Quality
11FIF LL�
N034TH WLSVA*nCM fir•
ba ss stmy,*4{g1�F
aim
L I
89JUT ®kB!tOAYiCaM
N.ov C'I
CITY OF IM.Nt: iaeivo2ag
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIMT SCALE'.
b- '
3
RESOLUTION NO. 87-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA'PLANNING )COMMISSIOM
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-04 FOR RYDEFc
TRUCK RENTAL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SANTA ANITA
AVEN'T NORTH OF 4TH STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUS`IZtAL
DIS1RICT APN: 229-331-06
WHEREAS, on the 5th day of February, 1987, a complete application was
filed by Ryuu ":..is Rental, Inc, for review of the above-described project;
and
WHEREAS, on tiz� 22nd day of April, 1981`, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held' aublic hearing, to consider, the above-described
project..
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be meta
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
Plan, the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan
and the Development Code, and the purposes of the
district in which the site is located.
2. That the proposed use, together with the: conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
publichealth, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity -
3. That the rroposed use complies with each of the
applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific
Plan and the Develcpment Cade.
SECTION 2: That this project will not creati adverse impacts on the
environment and-that a Negative Declaration is issued on April 22, 1987.
SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 86-04 is approved I,
subject to the following condition:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. Fibncin aloe portions of the north and south property lines
g g p p P Y
shall include a type of material that will provide screening of
views from 4th Street and the freeway. This material must be to
the satisfaction of the Design Review Committee and the City
Engineer and approved prior to issuance of building permits.
i
D-7
e
RESOLUTION NO. AdIfth
CUP 86-04 - Ryder
April 22, 1987
page 2
i
ng
1 box size
2. trovil Z property lineline of this parcel,evergreen trees S as well as theparcelo to
i; h
the south (Parcels 6 and 7 of Parcel Map 4749)•
At completion of flood control improvements with= Day Creek
3• owner shall be required to remove fencing
Channel, the property
esigned to
y,
along portions of north and south property lines design wall
allow flood overflow and replaced with 8 fait high
be Completed with
th sat sfact e remaining ion iof tt,..on a t City he i Plannerl and shall
be completed
Pd within 120 days of completion of Day Creek
improvements.
ENGINEERING DIVISION riate
1. Theepproapplant valsicfrom h shall AT,chison be required
nand rSantal Pe pRailroad
Company for any wor!c within their eaSoment prior to issuance
of a grading Permit,
nding of
2, An i,a_l 1'e overhead contrutilibution
o the{electrical)uon the uopposite
the existingthe City Prior to side of Santa Anita Avenue e$1 ThePafee shall be one-half the
the 'issuance of building per
mitt.
adopted unit amount times the length of the project
frontage. nt from the
3, ty
The applicant shall acquire xgrading
kdi a seme property prior
owners to the south for any
issuance of a grading permit.
lighting and
4. Notice of intention to form and/or join the
lands,aping district shall be f is with the City Counci �
to recordation or the map or issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first.
APPROVED ANo ADOPTED THIS 22N0 DAY OF APRIL, 1987.
pLANNINB CommISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: L
arry c , ao{nan
ATTEST: epu y ecre ary
ra � , 7
RESOLUTI!?N N0:
CUP 86-04 - Ryder
April 22, 1987
?age 3
I, grad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commissions of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby, certify that the foregoing Resolution waa duly and
regularly introduced, passsd, and adopted. by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the E2nd day tf April, 1987, by the following vote-to-rriC:
AYES; COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIM, TOLSTOY
NOES; COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS; NONE'
I
i
k'
I
k
'i
` U.1 YOv GOYC p{,p e Vy mob. V e`wY.�+
\�Yw Y Y • E.
lz "2
ec�' gG .
o oa fg a
, p�j Y c•. .L+N�� b�.o`W tic�..p C. �i. y C
�I c amp eo,r' c S�� .Y.� ...r,Kr.
<N`�$ aos-
$:
Co�^•O 'u sV`Y Nv
LaJ gisn oYo .�+gaeN '22 Y TZ 8H 9 -
p v O N N V
i•a pa ^L •e> C O M O Q..N O
C g N Y T 4 O a Y Y Y e 0 Q!a 3«.e. �r E y Y it
Y.
S—yyam, a 44
� �ayLL4S0�. qQ OU -al
NVC YCN...e.'.
1v� CO Gq L -aY T-9 fa S—
SC.L.•Y YO N?N..CO YO �a � Yu^.� w�
O V ^ Oa•OY�.y \ty PO-/yN N i1 yL9 M��
k.
g
i0 a ubwa ar o. N� �611 C� it a oy ptoAq�
is ^� ws N�pp
4M TbgO Ep9 L C N:: VV O.C-- aOVN4T
09« YL C.�_O_O C Yy...�. +OCC •Zt _L' pp �S_ _p_p Cy
p.�.Vi691HY9�+ FOO:GM 6 yw «mil `O<a �.0 G�.O. {y
a
0
m O
.'• c w i `• � n q ��w y..a a,a.a ..
$ �i.•V. � ap .�i�„j.y YSOL
' N
If
=b ..NYYNii G L Yam.b � big
to
C i g GG� •c
cqzc Rj g � YMo t^� a �]�t ,�ssyG�•^�a "•
` N n p•
O b`a ro� o c P vc.w]�q o c emu a
Vpp Fa �S ooO�o`a-nyLv+ -er i 9>6I:
q��• �O. ^ TW. qi. 90CC Lr{tbLf. a +`fW�_„0 y^=
Y q O n O w Y�p y O S •V O O O O C j!`-Y•a q 4 4 L—
tJ a= � iY .u.� 4..v .. gvq`o .•v i a w s '�Yi�
�r N+ ` �• �•'MC yM1�� � +py�.
�• G''�' @6 O.. i +E • frA -sOr. O•HRU-Y^.�t'a 04;�'y C • `.�b
O uLi1'Cw NCfi
41 4u a.p•ff $�' Y.`�S'' ^Q. �Q"a a.oc� Y''ae raw& �tif wo.�.
re s�4 c
O. c f r''4' p u �dQQKuow'v;a rd"..,a=r �r �ia8
�.�vrl Y40. p b�N $O YrG bY.JN yaN 9i�D9. '.
yv ^x' v co.� aq.Y. S�NNNLrY.�r 4 $�+��� $L rg l��• _
hny Y ■90�. O �!U{{a44"���` Ap`Vt''C_M b. t 4Y-C pnT^`C pC. 4 GpG
�`PM L^� I �N n`6 NFL OL^wNu90�.n• � O.r.�~C Q.O ��p��
ca
Ol
ap� y
c
Y aY` HwL H �NJ `Lw CLL S►"4 �.' •ter—yam ^'C OW 4 a6/N
v^..�•. QN^ 4N S'NO ML aCN Y�•�P� M nO �+� 4 <Y IL09pN a�
M
� ar' .w.ti o�•^4 g � N.Y P: �� �.��„ R.s..�aN q
q q W^
tea+ _`� a >� ��V w e9 `+u'na• owp ��.1L
Vp` V. �G N•wi+pV 9C6 Cw:= n�?�bL
as
^ w bGT V S M uO�iO.
I t Y•�a �qq��g
WQ V't �Lg•..ui O^^ Cw.N
~—. C r M N ju' O ;^,• tV C Q N =B O O N G u�.a.� �E��S LQ.i
ti N OCcw � 6Y �+. °• pc� v` L._ � g as_
Y q� V� y.^ u ..o• �C N L� =Y O q O q 4• C E 9
5 ag
vg
' • C vG L �= ` C9 V— O. a4 'C dv'O• C.�CCG�G C
r,^
nL.Fs` r�.. t GP£+ +O� 6u <C � 6CC C.�6 51 <✓6+ uL6{I��`Iz
G :r0 G q�G i 64 M �t
q
Lq t
•otb.=i O.0 �:E.d. �.. j ie y �u i O
C: pp Y CC C C p
�jV� ,C^M� C■u4��:O, �i'.f+ t01.� p_ Y y rq`�s " •
LU
p n�. oog c •. �N`. `� c i e a,o ..fi.,
p r wit,9G 4`U Y� a y fi yO �G! y! _y.� O^ ^ Cy■i w"Ybb.
4 5
cy �
CO�` �PCOC�.C�■C � ^Y!^ ^yuy. • M ■ q `t ^. Y M N �J !'V'y
AD
Qu'qG 4 N O O K•N.G o w^ • �W g � O ✓ 'Yr0 4A S Y p y.G 4+N � .
aC Fr S �"..P � •�~ "' V.Y. y" s �I yYy'.N P`Y ■�V
b�� 4 O Y V��i � �' _���n. �y� Y.w YC4■G yr' �^C C q't � '
I� • N CCyy y�/ VVyy `4`^ {p.i CppC+� SAY{V0�+�6 yC }���
C OOCW 04 � +�M sa LM Kg OL6 6�i •�
a Y = O
J
Ali
k_ = r; 3• e k 5 8 Fkg
€ k. 8
']Qs!'!«�i� fiL�a_i�
jL4�� �1� Y C 6a�Z �i�•$ '��g�
8l p■ lS M }� �y
Cy "i �e N.^.�•.0 • -�G� 10 O �C N� V CpR1 iYOYy
C.
■ p G�q y L
qna
yZid " - D1ti C! 6 F.T. Mq • p^yn gCy E.IL Qaa`±
O1� M O ww ff;li CT '�fi. qqOp k $N.�V
a8 YyY1
e al. p
a" Lagg oa o3Ve' r� >: �rk : s "r� g�8 wx �
aepp rFs' YP� 11H ",•, �Tv+
uC® AGO $'O. Ow Y� wN Lac C^ 01'.y ♦. Y Ns �c 4.O 00-�f^LN
R014u �� K. ■ a y ■
�� wy
a {
_s
o�
u
O_
F-
C2 a•o
4
�L
4 y YCO y 4 p {,yC E�O� VCy S
cv
O Vy a.Q.O La N C`. !C�eYW
O • Y v S D O 4.
•O V� � Y..•
Y ttT�y O�}w � ��� 3 � O710w�• II�i�4 Y
YY lN r
gpp�
40 1Vr� •� V �Y� `' V Y `N
5�0. `
SE
O Y rz Og�a N O 4 O Y r Y N O ♦f1 V G Q NUJ
-I la
b 7 C Q C yy y
�Y `C•"O �' E �.y
a.' �r�i...- • tar C.Cu C■b,F 4 ^.c r ti�'&�. ~` 12
A �t M1 ft • {I•
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RffiZHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME
PATENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-04 FOR A
j RYDER TRUCK RENTAL FACILITY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
SANTA ANITA AVENL—', NORTH OF 4TH STREET IN THE GENERAL
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 14), AND MAKTNG FINDINGS IN
F SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: - 229-331-06.
WHEREAS, a request has been filed `.ar a time "tens-on for the
above-described rroject, pursuant to Section 17.02.100
WHEREAS, the Plahning Commission conditionally approved the
above-described industrial project.
SECTION 1: The Rancho !Cucamonga planning Commission has made the
following inn rffgs
A. That prevailirng economic sa..uitions have caused k
distressed market climate, for development of the
project.B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory
conditions make it unreasoriible to develop the
project at this time.
1p C. That strict erforcR apt of the conditions of approval
regarding expiratio ; would not be consistent with
the intent of the Dpl.ilopment Code.
That the granting ,c .;aid time extension will not be
detrimental to the pubt;%; nealth,, safety, or welfare,
or materially injurious to properties or impeovement
s
in the vicinity.
SECTION ",- The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a
time exten7s-fon or:
Project Applicant Expiration
CUP 86-04 RYDER ,pril 22, 1990
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS LOTH DAY OF MAY, 1989.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
8Y.
" Larry TlFc_ ie airman
�:. ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
SUP 86-04 - RYOER
May 10, 1969
Page
f
I, Bi,3d Buller, Secretary of the PI annii,q i,ommi ss I on of the Ci ty of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the, foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly Introduced,_passed„ and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City or Rago?v+o Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission_held.
on thtt inLn 'day of May, 1989, by the follalstng votd-to-wit:
AYV: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
n
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 10, 1989' J
TO: Chairman and Members of the Plann?c;q Commission
FROM`: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner 1
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-.44
Barasch Architects e development of 3 in us r al
buildings totaling 70,458 square feet on 3.79 net acres of
)and- located in the General Industrial District (Subarea
?) located -south of 9th, Street, between Lion Street and
Hellman Avenue - APN 2.091t013-24.
I. PROJECT AND SITE ifESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negativo Declaration
B. SurroundingLand Use and Zoning:
North Warehouse building vacant; General Industrial
South - Vacant, General Industrial
East Multi-tenant. Industrial; Generale Industrial
West - Vacant; General Industrial
` C. General Plan Desig'natio�ns:
ro ect to -Gener—aT Industrial i
North General Industrial
South - General Industrial
East - General Industrial
West General Industrial
f 0. Site Characteristics: The project site is vacant.
F. parking Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided
Buil la'ngA"
Office 1,100 1J250 4 4
Manufacturing 15,132 11500 30 30,
Warehouse 11000 1/10,00 ' �1
I
o,
TM4 E
;f
"PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 88-44 - BARASCH ARCHITECTS
May 10, 1989
Page 2
Building n B
Office 1,60a 11250 6 6
Manufacturing 27,166 . 11S�.a 54 54
Warehouse 2,OOD 1/1600 2 2
Building It"
Offic: 1,350 11250 5 5
Manufacturing 19,538 1/500 39 39
Warehouse 1,000 1/1000 1 1-
w J T5'
TOTAL 70,468 142 142
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The proposed use is consistent with the Industrial
Plan and with surrounding uses. The proj6tt was
reviewed by the Design Review Committee on April 6, 1989. The
^ammittee did not recommend approval and the project is
scheduled for additianal review on May 4, 1989. Afte-
environmental determination by the Planning, Commission and
Design/Technical Review Corgi,tittee approval: final approval of
the project will come through the City Planner with -special
and standard conditions.
B. Design Review Committee: The Comittee (Chitiea, Tolstoy,
oZ`oeman rev eweF itre project on April 5, 1989. At that
meeting the Committee recommended the item come back to the
Committee as a consent calendar item with the following
recommended modifications:
1. Architecture:
a. Building colors should be modified to include green
glass with white mullions, green spandel, and green
painted bands.
b. Reveal pattern should be revised, .as discussed, further
reveal pattern should be carried throughout all
building elevations.
c, Spandrel glass should be incorporated above each
building entry.
2. Employee plaza areas should be enlarged. < ;,
1 r
't PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR'88-44 - BARASCH ARCHITEUS
May 10, 1989
Page 3Adffik
3. Enhanced pavement should be incorporated at project entry
at Lion and Heilman and from the entry of Build-ng "B" to
c south landscape planter.
4. Trees should be incorporated along north elevation of
Buildings "A" and "C,,.
S. Trash enclosures should be-relocated away from employee
plaza areas, preferably behind the truck parking stalls.
Revised, elevations were reviewed by DRC on April ZO and additional-
changes were recom Laded.
III. FXTS POR FINDINS: The`\ roposed use is consistent with the
�en�era,"plan a nddastr.ia'f"Specific Plan. The building design
and site plan together with the recomeended modifications`,,and
conditions of o proval are in compliance with the Industrial
Specific Plan. Toe project will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, welfare or materially injurious to surrounding
properties.
Ask Iv. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Plannfug Comnission issue a
Negative Declaration for Development Review Sid-44.
ARe5nn6e
tted
BB;CK;is
Attachments: Eznibit-,,`A", Location Map
Exhibit'"V' - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Build,ng Elevations
v
,v
� I
I�
a] r
II
W
1
NOMI
CIS OF ITEM: RE. fs- T
RAMC UCAMONG TITLE:
Original Poor
'� 'r a iun` •.
pal
e
'3AY Mi'M1T3N � r -�
E
,}f F w�
Y•H
Rig all
1 qV
h tt
UITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:
EXHIBIT: SCALE: .d
BUILDING A
r--PAW=COAt,-MPANaS 77,352 GRASS S.f.
PAWM*ACCENT8AN4S__l
AwmaumNa
J�r/f twfm ./Itr3;S
{ / CONCFlETE MEA(S
7/ !/ VG"r5AN08fASMCQNCAETg
SOUTH ,
J^�-CtCJfT SANdeI,�STgD AfCESSFO ACCENt
� <'SfCESSEO'ACCENT 9ANd---1
WEST
JTEM
4
RANCHO- CUCAMONg TITLE: 13441-yiuc,
B(:.LD/NG B
rPAlh7WC0ACAMPANM3 30,706 GROSS$.F.PAWMUNDSLIGNT SANpLAWED NWESSEO ACCENTny=GL4aW
Hw7ENUuJoNS
CGNGRETEREVEALS
1
- SOUTN
NORM
.4,
EAST
- W
EST
NORTH
OF ITEM: �� •��
RANCHO CON TITLE:
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT..RAU.
BUItDiNG
xrswneusrPotnNCRtrE 21,888 GRASS S.5.
JNTPA.tCCExiEexpS
�ANCRE'EFEVEAtS
Dh'Y7PACLNYJ7ETEPAX:G3
TB�T4 Gt�12Wq
+�aarq.�wu+cns
SvuTN +
I
- NORTH
� -----•.. -- - EAST
.GMT 5ANAµ.4^TE6 pPCPBtPA ACCENT I
RECESSED ACCENT-. 'k
WEST
Nt}RTH
CITY r
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TMZ: UV.PI!5
PLANNLXG DIVISION �`� _-_-EXHIBM�..,.... SCALE. --
-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN11ON44 •^
STAFF REPORT a s
DATE: May 10, 1989
TO: Chairman rind Members of the Planning Comnission
PROM: Brad Buller, City planner
!Y_ Cynthia S. kN,-ser, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: VARIANCE 89-04 -;0WEP.CIAL CARRIERS - A naq„est to reduce
e :par ng setback from eat 4o 8 feet and the
landscape setback from 3$ feet to 8 feet for 12 acres of if
land in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Induutrial Distt'ict
(Subarea 9), located on w}e south side of Jersey
Boulevard, between Utica and Vincent:'tones. APN: 209-
143-07, 08 $ 09.
MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-71 - COMMERCIAL-CARRIERS - A
reques ^ o gra a an pave approximately acres of'
land
for an existing site within the Minimum ImpactiReavy
Inrustrial District (Subarea 9), located on the south side;
of Jersey Boulevard, between Utica and Vincent Avenues -
APN: 299-143-07,08,09.
i. ABSTRACT: At th,z April 26, 1989 Planning Commission meeting,
sta wars directed to prepare Resolutions of Denial for Minnr
Develapnrent,Review 87-11 and Variance 89-14. The -Solutions were
prepared based on public testimony and. Commission comments,, and
are attached for your consideration.
Re ally tted,
Br le
city annoy
8B:CK:3s _
I
Attachments: Resolution of Denial - VA,,K 00
Resolution of Denial - NOR o7-7
i
t -
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENYING VARIANCE NO. 89-04 TO REDUCE THE
PARKIIro SETBACK rROM 25 FEET TO 8 FEET AND;--a--DUCE THE
LANDSCAPE SETBACK FROM '35 FEET TO 8 FEET FOR sc'ACRES OF
LAND LOCATED ON THE S(XITH SIDE OF JERSEY BOULEVARD
BETWEEN U"_CA AND VINCENT' AVENUES IN THE MINIMUM
IMPACT/HEAVY INDUSTRIAL D.;STRICT (SUBAREA 9), AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN ShPPORT THEREOr APN: 209-143,-07, '08, 09
A. Recitals.
(i) Commercial Carriers has filed an application for the issuance
of t,+e Variance No. 89-04 as described in the title of this Resolution,
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as
"the application".
(ii) On Apri`i 26, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and continued said hearing to May 10, 1989.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon subste ial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on A;r .tl 26, 1989, and continued to
Mw 10, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Commission hereby spec fically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at <<'0807
Jersey Boulevard with a street frontage of 814 feet and an average lot depth
of 673 feet and is presently improved with an office, warehouse, and parking
lot; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is 'multi-
tenant industrial, the property to the south of that site consists of a
warehouse, the property to '_he east is vacant, and the property to the hest i
a warehouse; and
(�,,) The application applies to a site that is currently
^roved with an office bui'.ding, warehruse building and parking lot and is
crnsidered a legal non-conft ring lot; and
PLANNING CCMMISSIOH RCSOtUTION NO
VA89-04 - C"ERCIAL CARRIERS
May 10, 1$
Page 2
(d) Municipal Code Section 17.06.020E authorizes the Cnity .
Planner to impose reasonable conditions upon a Minor Development Review permit
approval, including requirements for landscaping, street improvements,
s regOation of vehicufar-�ingress, egress and traffic circulation, establishment
of development schedules or time limits for performance or completion; and
(e.` Municipal Code Section 17.06.020A states that the purpose
and intent of th, Minor Development Review permit process is to a's,ure that
such limited projects .comply with all applicable City Star:.lards and
Ordinances•, and
t
(f) The site plan submitted in conjunction with the
application, cues<not meet the Industrial Specific Plan standard of a 35-foot
average landscape setback and minimum 25-foot parking setback, as measured
frof the ultimate face of curb. Further, the site plan and existing chain
li„k fence improvements do not meet the Industrial 'Specific Plan standards for
screening outdoor storage of vehicles within 120 feet of a street frontage
with masonry, concrete or other similar materials; and
(9) The site currently is improved with four driveways withit
820 feet of street frontage. The Uty's access policy for arterial street
specifies that driveways on the same side of a street be spaced 300 fe_:
apart. Therefore, only two driveways woIJ4 be allowed on this site. Further,
driveways should align with driveways opposite side of the street or by
off-setting a safe distance to avoid c—r'rictinQ left-turn movements, The
City's access policy also requires the access br located a minimum 100 feet
from intersections.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
f during the above-referirtt: public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That strict el literal interpretation aid
enforcement of the specified regulation would not
result in practical difficulty, or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives
of the Development Code.
(b) That there are nit exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property involved or to the intended use of the
properties in the same district,
(c) That strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of the specified regulation would not
deprive the applicant ,of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the same district.
10
w
PLANNING COWISSON RESOLUTION NO.
VA89-04 COMMERCI;'L CARRISRS
May 10, 1989
Page 3
(d) That. the granting of tha Variance will constitute a
grant of special privilege inco,.sistent with the
limitations on other properties classified in the
same district,
(e) That the granting of the Variance will be
detrimental to the public, health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to:properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. B,ased upon_ the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2, and 3 above, this ,
Commission hereby denies the application subject to
each and every conditfGa"set forth bets.
S. The Sec•-?tary to this Commission shal`i certify to the adoption
of this Resolution,
APPROVED AND ADOPTER THIS 10TH DAY Off' MAV 1989.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF TKE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
i
BY.
Larry T. McNiel, chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission ol,"; City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resa,461on was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the "'.- ning Comissfon of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at o regular meeting of the''alannirg GxmIssion held
on the 10th day of May 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: C034ISSIO.NERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS;
L
RESOLUTION NO_
A RESBLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE r-ITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENYING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW lid. 87
71, LOCATED AT 10807 JERSEY 80ULC%.VARD IN THE MINIMM
IMPACT/HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 9) OF THE
INDUSRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 20-143-07, 08, 09
A. Recitals.
(i) Commercial Carrier's has filed an application for the approval
of Minor 1°evelapment Review No. 87-71 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafte_ in this R�solutior., the subject Development Review
request is referred to as,,"ttie application".
(ii) On the of 26th of April 19K, the Planning Commiss;on of the
City of Rarcho Cucamonga conttucted a meeting on the application and continued
said meeting '-o May 10, 1909.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred,
8. '<esolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
` Planning Cn mnission of the Ci*y of Rancho Cucamonga-as follows:
i
t._ This Commissir . hereby specifically firdr that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this iesolution ave true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence prounted to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeiaiag on April 26, 1989, and Continued to May
10, 198e ir--luding wr;ttan and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby
spec'FI-1111ty fia ds as (.-Mows:
(a) The application applies to; property located at LO807
Jersey Boulevard with a street frontage of 814 feet' an average IoL. klepth
of 673 feet and is presently improved wi`.h an office, -warehouse and parking
lot; and
f,
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is Multi-
teidnt industrial park the property to the south of that site consists of a
warehouse, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is
a warehouse; and
(c) The application applies to a site that is currently
improved with an office building, warehouse building and pa-king, ?ot and is
considered a legal non-conforming lot; and
t , I
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
MDR 87-71 COMMERCIAL CARRIERS
May 10, 1989
Page 2
(d) Municipal Code Section 17.06.020B authorizes the City
Planner to impose reasonable cor:ditiona upon a Minor Development Review permit
approval, including requirements for landscaping, street improvements,
regulation of vehicular ingress, egress and traffic circulation, establishment
of development sch•zdules-or time limits for ;erformance or completl6n; and
(e) Municipal Code Section 17.05,O2J.A states that the pu.pose
and intent of the r for Development Review permit process is to assure that
such limited projects comply with al applicable City Standards and
Ordinances; and
(f) The site plan submitted in conjunction with the
application, does not meet the Industrial Specific Plan standard of a 35-foot
�. average landscape setback and minimt:�, 25-foot parking setback, as measured
from .he ultimate :ace of curb. Further, the site plan and existing chain
link fence improvements du not meet the Industrial Specific Plan standards for
screening outdoor storage of vehicles within 120 feet of a stre�.z frontage
with masonry, concrete or other similar materials; and
(g) The site currently is impr,.ved with four driveways withi►.
820 feet of street frontage. The Cit 's access policy for arterial streets
specifies that driveways on the same side of a street be spaced no less than
300 feet apart. Therefore, orrly two driveways would be allowed on this 1906
site. Further, driveways should align with driveways on the enposite side of
4 the street or by off-setting a safe distance to avcid conf'' ',ng left-turn
movements. The City access policy also requires the ar be located a
minimum 100 feet from intersections.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meetings and upon the specific findings of facts
set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 atov4, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed project is not consistent with the
objectives of the General Plan;-ant1
;b) That the proposed f is „ot in accord with the objective
of the Industrial Specify- Ilan and the purp±-s s of the district in which the
site is located, and
(c) That the prc , ed use is not in compliance with each of the
ap,licable provisions ryf the Development Cod<< and
(d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable the, to, will be detrimental to the public he/Ath, safety, or
welfare, or materially inju;�ious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity,
AUL
r 4. Based ui..� a!id conclusions set forti in paragra-h
, 2, and 3 above, this ez o denies the application.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLliION NC
MDR 87-71 COtMEP,CIAL CARRIERS
May 10, 1989
Page 3 _
5' The Sc-retary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution
�P-PROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH t)AY OF MAY 19e9}
~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THL CITY yr RANCHO CL AMONGA
t BY
Larry T—McNIel, la rmaa
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, becretary
I, Brad Bul1e.-, osretary of she Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, de., hereby"certify t.4t the foregoing Resolution was dulu and
regularly incrodu,.ed, passed, and adapted by the Planning Com"ission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at � regular meeting Af the Planning Commission held
on the loth day of May, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit*
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: '
NLCS: CQvIVISSIONERSc
ABSENT: COWSSIONERS:
I -
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT qic
f DATE: May 10, 1989
TO: Chairman and Members of the-Planning Commission
i
FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer
BY: Barbara Krai1, Assistant Civil Engineer '
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12058 BARASCH j
ACRITFCTS
e subdivision Y net acres o and into parcels j
n 't eneral Industrial 'i-ttrict (Subarea 2), located south of f
9th Street between Lion Street and Hellman Avanue (APN 209-013-14)
1 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Re uestel; Approval of the proposed ltntative Parcel Map as
s�Ticwn on ExHiDit "B"
B. Pa-ce1'Size;
Parcel 1 - 0.96 ac.
Parcel 2 - 1.54 ac:
P r~tel 3 - 1.29 ac.
To4al �.79 5c.
C. Existinq Zonings
General Indu.trial (subar�z; 2)
D. Surrounding Land Use:
North - Existing Industrial Building
South - Vacant _
East - Single family
West - Vacant
E. Surroundincr Generae Plan and Develozmcoit Code Designationo;
North General Industrial (subarea 2)
South - General Industrial (subarea 2)
East - General Industrial (subarea 2)
j West - Gene,,ai Industrial (subarea 3,)
F. Site Characteristics:
- ss
The site is vacant except for natural grasses and shrubs, 4
1=4 H
ji
d
PLANNING COMMI'SSIOPt.STAFF REPORT
TENT PARCEL MAP 1207,,3 - MASCH ARCHITECTS
MAY 10, 1989
PAGE 2
I'I. ANALYSIS:
The purpose of this parcel map is to create 3 parcels for industrial
use. Development Plans for this site are on tonight's agerda as
Development Review 88-44. Street improvenenbs with J�he exception of
parkway improvements are existing for both Lion Street and He1',tman
Avenue. The parkway improvements are trr. be completed with the
development of the parcels.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL.. REVIEW, The applicant completed Part Iti, of the Initial
tiny. a can acted a field investigation and completed Part It of
the Initial Study. No dverse impacts: upon the a,nvironment are
anticipated as a result of trips project, Therefore, issu0ce of Negative
Declaration is appropriate«
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Nearing have been sent+ to surrounding
property owners and placed in tide Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the
site has also been completed.
V. RECOKMENDATION: It fs recommended that the Plannino Commission consider
all inp�` putt ana—elements of the Tentative Parcel Map 12058. If after such
consideration, the Commission can recommend ,poroval, `kIlen the adoption
of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative.becleratlun would
be appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
, ?lf '
Barrye R. Hanson
Senior Civil 'Engineer
BRH:BK:dlw
Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A")
Tentative trip (Exhibit "8")
Site Plan (Exhibit "C")
Resolution and
Recomtw,nded Conditions of Approval
,h
j
a
'r
0
w a
+� a I„
j
r O '
°
subarea t p , ® ..t;mb3rea 3
� � I
Femn
AT
RANCHO CUCAMONGA V!C€N IT`i M A P
ENGMMMG DrMION IA 3ExEnm.
z
UJ
LA
le
Irk
v
Original Poor Quality
i
p��m♦ � , �y�g,►
l�S'l-'------------
IL
Ab
CITY OF LEL MAP 12DEa,
� / ' rtworr roslr.l ♦ y v�;k t t 1_
R_ NGRO CUCA&' ONGA • &IT 6 PLAN '(aim 8?'-I"i4
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, -CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL PAP NUMBER 12058, LOCATED SOUTH OF 9TH
STREET .BETWEEN HELLMAN AVENUE AND LION STREET AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-- APN 209413-24
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number. 12058, submitted by Barasch
Architects, applicant, for the purpose of sub�fviding into 3 parcels:, the real
property situated inthe City of Rancho Cucakinga,. County of San Bernardino,
State of California, identiffad as ANN(s) 209-013-24, located south of 9th
Street between Hellman Avenue and Lion'Street; and
WHEREAS, on May lO, 1989, 'th;. Planning Commission held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above-described map.
NOV, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
1. That the mep is consistent with the General Plan,
2. That the improvzment of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the General Plan.
3. That the sfte is physically suitab`s for the
proposed development.
4. That the-propcsed subdivision and improvements Will
not cause substantial environmental damage, public
health problems or ha4e adverse affects on abutting
property.
SECTIOi, 2: This Co!anission finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considerer in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Deciaration,
SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 12058 is hereby approved
subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special
Conditions:
'I
i
G,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TENT PARCEL MAP 12069 - BARASCH ARCHITECTS
MAY 10, 1989
PAGE 2
Special Conditions
1. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future andergreunding of the
existing overheal utilities (telecommunication and electriciall on the
'1m opposite side of Hellman Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to
approval of the FiL 1 Parcel Map, The `ee shall be ape-half the City
adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage.
2. the north/south public storm drain located within the ,;roject shall �e
designed and constructed as follows or as otherwise approved by the
City Engineer
a. The pipe shall contain a Q100,
b. It shall be compatible with an ultimate storm drain extending from
9th Street to the future extension of Feron 'Boulevard to the
south, therefore a preliminary design for that total,;system will
be necessary,
c. The pipe shall have a minimum cover of 3 feet, and
d. Trees shall: be located so that the outside edge of a !nature tree
trunk is at least five feet from the outside edge of the pipe.
3. A public storm drain extending from Lion, Street to the north/south
public storm drain shall be provided as approved by the City AML
Engine_r. Trees shall be located so that the outside edge of a mature
tree trunk is at least 5 Meet from the outside edge of the pipe.
4. An access to lion Street shall be provided for Parcels 2 and 3 so that
access can be maintained when Hellman Avenue is flooded. A ;sufficient
portion of the north/south public storm drain shall be 1,a4! alled to
insure that the access is passible during a, 100 year storm.
5. Easements for the public storm drains shall be provided as approved by
the City Engineer.
6. An improvement certificate shall be placed upon the Final Map stating
the folIowityls
, J
a. Improvem;wnts to Heilman Avenue shall be completed at the time of
,12velopment of Parcel 3.
b. Improvements to Lion Street and the public storm drain
improvements shall be completed at the time of development of
Parcels 1 or 2, whichever develops first,
c. An all weather access to Lion Street shall be constructed upon the
development of Parcels 2 or 3, whichever develops first.'
qW
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TENT PARCEL MAP 12058 - BARASCH ARCHITECTS
MAY 10, 19P,4
PAGE 3
APPROVED AMD ADOPTED T!, S 10TH DA't OF MY,
i
PLANNING COKNISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGt1
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Ncretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of„the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that this foregoing Re.olution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adop,°ed by the Planning Commission of 'the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting;of the Plah;xiog Commission held
j on the 10th day of May, 1989, by the following voteato-wit;".
F' AYES: CO.+LMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
I
r
f
9^� ! � y C 6p>.. w`pi 6 _•`Q ROC' w C � C •S
M 4 • ' _ ` L cCi N'E� Y =^ �t4 YG tJC
�. C` ! !^r.,`�Y(. Y•C'.M u, qQy
� JY L#rt ^K f
�Li
.yy�r« a w�:i +4 � .apt,'�o fiu ii� 'fs":�r yym� '�}• i`i. :..{
gEwa+ wJ4a wYJ.'
!tI[I ♦ K s
y _ Ala
Y �r
M 4 Y la
j_
V
17 �� � oZ 4_ it Yr `o
�C(y4 M� i'.l:
IQr �.� �i �`a di M zCA� 9..� �^f(•� Nr}� ��
jI
Y G ` r • M .1:u p r W + Y y_ V Lr rtrQ O•�
-I 11Z
C� �� NH. 4 Y <J,i 4 WGi 4 12 wq Kq w C
W
Yl b� f
.g ic—F
�IVa
It
S� g
U+YY. aYY Y 4` d
ape A O C q
` C
Bra
VAV E"' e � "-V Slit coCp pp F
w y ebb
Brn ^ �y Y ��� �9 V Y ■O
L.�
b .4 k
b
CC. �C q�G ♦ 1. Lr �yp.�Ly1A �1pM
Y C • 4 C C A ! f
r ►s
Y as, Ny. y'j L m. bi{Vy�y
►M �► O4V Y ■t8 ��X yi> L.�C'u� 4Ye yi die.
{y1i O� K6 rA � 6.2Z <!d y ��0 as.q► ��6� Ir'i6 i�D- OZ� li
q > N '1 ♦ N � N e1 ..j M AI'
D
— — CITY OF RANCHO CUC1-',MONGA
STAFF REPWRT
C�
DATE: May 10, 1989 �
TO- Chairnan and Metrbers of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner i
I SUBJECT: ENVIROMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-07
e request o asca-6lish a seciTfid dwelling unit on a"
'sing e family lot in the Very Law Residential District (lest
than 2 dwelling units per, acre), located at 5254 Gallcwv
street APN: .106I=061-10,
1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action e�uest�eu: pprov al of a 'Conditional Use Permi', and
ssudnce ci•a Regative Declaration.
B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin
North -man B�rnar no au��ood Control property; Very
Low Density Re. idential (less than 2 dwelling units
per acre`.
South Existing single family residences; Very Low Density
Residential (less than 2 6--fling u-tits per acrr:),
East Existing single family residences, "ory Low Density
Residential Hess than 2 owelling w '!ts per acre).
Hest - Existing single family residences, ery Low Density
Residential (le,.,. than 2 dwelling units pei acre).
} C. General Flan DU, st4aation,^,.
roJec e - very Law Je'nsity Residential
Borth - Very Loin vansity Residential
South Very Low Density Residential
Easy - Very Low Density Residential
'West - Very Low 01 sity Residential
i
D. Site Characteristicsr llio site corsi:sts. of nn existing single
3�z y res ederrce:and' second dwalting unit in the reae yard
area.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. Gerieral• Section 17.08.030 of the Development Codra permits
secon Tw+elling units subject t*ct stain criteria and a;�proval
of a Conditional Use Permit. Staff has reeiewed the
application and has &terminad that, with the Conditions of -,
Approval, at the criteria will be met.
3TEP't I 1
1r
r
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RE: ENV. ASSESS, b CUP 8947 - ADAME
May 10 , 1989
Page Z
B. Specit,cS The applicant intends to convert an existing
accessory structure into a second dwelling unit. It was built
in 1981 as a recreation buildinw, Approximately 180 square
feet of the existing structure will be converted into storage
space. A garage door will be added in order to ,access this
portion of the structure. The remainder of tha structure (620
square feet) will be used as a living area with a scull
kitchen and bath.
The unit is intended for use by a relative and meets all of
the applicable site development criteria for the Very Low
Density Residential District. in order to satisfy the Code
requirement for parking, however, the applicant will need to
ccnstruct a single car garage addition on the north side of
the main residence's garage. Section 17.12.040 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code requires that parking be "within a
garage";. carports are prohibited from use to satisfy minimum
Code requirements. Condition No. 1 of the Resolution of
Approval requires that this work be completed.
C. Environmental AssAssment., Staff has found no significant
mpic s on tpc,env ronment as a result of this project,
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS; The project, as con .is consistent
Oth 5 Development Code and General Plan, l.e prr;ject will not
be detrimental to adjacent properties h- cause significant
environmental impacts. In addition, t;le p`r.)posed project is in
compliance with City Standards.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE, This item has been advertised in The Daily Report
newspaper as a public hearing. The property has'1ie'en posted and
notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the
project site.
V. RECOMMENDATION:: Staff reconnends that the Planning Commission
approved onal Use Permit 89-07, subject to the Conditions of
Approval, through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance
of a Negative Declaration.
p tfull - mi ,
krad $u r
Ct4y,,,,i' ann �.
BB:BN:ko
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "B" Location`fian
Exhibit "C" Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Garage Plan
Resolution of Approval with Conditions uil
Original Poor Quality
PIA=_TII,G COD114153101 MOMS
o-er Section 17.08.030 .item 6 Second Dwelling Unit.
This Unit was constructed abcut a decade ago as an
acces:vary buildin.in a -residential: area as indicated
under 6-a. .he unit is far :;.se b-r a father of 65 years as
required by 6-b and h. The lot contains an existing single
family detached residence and does not contain a guerst house
as oer 6-c. The unit does nut exceed 640 sq. feet. 6-d.
P'nis uni. ',as a separate en'=ance from the main residence
6--e and o-f zroviles a ve%icle carport/sarage per Chapter
17.12. ''ne unit looks like al' other dwelling in t:.e area
with Shp-Ice a^.d c-.eam color stucco per 6-3.
Items 6-1 and j are ;;omalie! -,ith. 4, se_tic ta;-t/drain
field .as been installed aid accepted permit r 39-2705.
coven.=:ce by Jim ac^zroel= on 3-14-69-
=c -^e best of -_ :crowledzo a-! of the csnd miens re_, ired.
b, aeat_cn 17.2E,030 Items 6-a thru j have been complied :•:ith.
_ .._e -_fie y s:cnd on }.ie au_lication.
si.:ned: :?eorge ,ulic::, :gent
I
i
Cii O ITEM: CUP ss_t��
C UAL TITLE: LETTER FROMAPPLICANT
f?fw,�a✓�r�
Original Poor
Quality
V(CIkl IT "I
main dwelling unit/
second dwelling unit ,�t•�f_.�
07
R/of
6. F. C: 0.
H
d 1.� I: P V 1 LI �•
ti• G _ � � b
0
fir
V19•a ,iev.sc_ Q r
CAD
a �V 19
s
NORTH
ci 1 i OF ITEM: CUP 89-07
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: LOCATION MAP
PLANNING DIVISION -4 EXHIBIT: 13 SCALE:- �.�.
name
Jriginal Poor Quality
l�'vi�T rao� St'orayE coy
�+ 6016
Ir rrz9 Hear
�lnfis�rs��d yafd
SECOND DWELLING UNIT
NORTH
(PITYOF ITEM:- CUP 89-07
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: SM." PLAN
PLANNING L► ' ay�ON EXI3BIT: SCALE: no,. ,
'Original Poor Quality
£zcrs�ia3 .. �aI/ow�Y
art
b�
mo-r to sc.-k le I
` r . i.it'Sc'j Cps + tic 7L
MAIN DWELLING UNIT j
I
i
NORTH
CITY OF $'I'EM: CUP 89-07 II
RANCHO C CA ON A �r ���: GARA G PLAN
PLANNING 01VISION EXHIBIT: D SCALE: none
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. '89-07 FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A .S_COND
DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT' 5254 GALLOWAY'STREET IN)THE VERY
LOW' RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2'DWELL IW L'hITS PER
ACRE) APH: 1061-061-10, AND,MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
A. Recitals.
O Jose Adame has riled an application for the issuance of
Conditional Use Permit No. 89-07 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application".
(1i) On the 10th day of May, 1989, the Planning, Commission of the
;City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the 'adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
Ntrl, THEREFORE, it is he,eby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission herby specifically finds that all of tha facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Re#olution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during toe, above-referenced public hearing on May 10, 1989, including written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Cot-mission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at 5254
Galloway Street which is presently improved, and
(b) The :propert,--f to the north of the subject site is San
Bernardino County Flood Control property, the property to the south of that
site consists of a single family residence, the property to the east is a
single family residence, and the property to the west is a single family
residence.
i
f
{
F
PLANNING caMMIssIa RESOLUTION NO.
RE: CUP 89-07 - AtpAME
may 10, 1989
Page 2
3. 'Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
dur'ng the above-refererzad public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as.follows:
(a) That the, proposed project is in accord with the General
Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district
in which the site is located, and
(b) That the proposed project, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
(c", That the proposed project complies with i.acb of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code, including Section 17.08.030
pertaining to second dwelling>units.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and consi'dered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission: hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.,
S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the ti,,pplication subject
to each and every condition set forth below,
1) The applicant shall_ provide a single space
garage addition to the north side of the main
residence's garage, to serve, the second
dwelling unit to the satisfaction of the City
Planner. Said garage shall be completed prior
to occupancy of the second dwelling unit.
2) The second welling unit shall not exceed 640
squar4 feet of living area.
3) The unit shall not be for sale, but shall be
used for rental purposes only, or use by a
member of the immediate family.
4) Prior to occupancy, the applicant Shall submit
to the Building and Safety Division written
certification from the affected water and sewer
district that adequate water and sewer
facilities are or will be available to serve
the proposed unit. For units using septic
facilities: allowable by the Santa Ana Ragional
Quality Control Board and the City, written
certification of acceptability including all
supportive information shall be submitted.
l
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO,
RE: CUP 89-07 a ADAME
May,10, 1989
Page 3
5) 'This approval -shall not waive compliance with
all sections of the Development Code or all
other applicable City Ordinances in effect at
the time of the approval of the Conditional Use
Pexmit.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROISD AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY, 1989>
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY*
Larry r, WNW, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad u e'r, _cre Syr
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho �
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 10th-day of May, 198h, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COK41SSIONERS:
ABSENT:. COMMISSIONERS:
I
i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF DEPORT 4
_1
�A�Y
DATE: May 10, 1989
TO: 4hairman and Members ofthe Planning Commission
FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer j
BY: Betty Miller, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12218 HIX
subdivision or 9.2b acres of landinto 4 parcels In
the Low Re Development District, located on the east side
of Hellman Avenue, south of 19th Street (APR 202-061-35,,39 and 40)
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIONt
A. Action Requested: Approval izf the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as
5 Own on ExhIDIZ '15"
B. Parcel Size:
Parcel 1 8.26 AC
Parcel 2 0.63 AC
Parcel 3 0.51 AC
Total 37. V AC
C. Existing Zoning:
Low Residential (2-4 DU/AC)
D. Surrounding Land Use:
North Single Family Residential
South - Single Family Residential
East - Single Family Residential
.Test - Single Family Residential
E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Cods Designations:
North Low Residential
South Low Residential
East Low Residential
Best - Low Residential
F. Site Characteristics:
Except for two existing single family houses fronting Hellman
Avenue at the northwest corner, the site is vacant and glor.s to
the southeast at 4.2 percent.
r ITEM J
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TENT. PM 12218 - HIX DEVELOPMENT
MAY 10, 1989'
PAGE 2
II. ANALYSIS'
The developer owns several parcels in this area. The purpose of this
parcel malty is to create half acre lots around two existing houses on
Hellman Avenue so that the developer may purchase the vacant remaining
land (parcel 1). The developer intends to submit a tract map later which
will include Parcel 1 plus parcels to the north and east of Parcel 1.
The developer has submitted several master plans for staff review, but
none have been deeMee,acceptable to date. One of the master plan layouts
is shown in Exhibit "C" for your reference. The main concerns with that
particular plan is that it does not provide connections to the three
adjacent deadend streets.
Given the size of the master planning area and the amount of frontage on
public ;,veets, the (proposed parcel map will not st'i-iously constrain
future Bract layout,decisions. However, staff feels it is important to
retain as much design Flexibility as possible; in particular, the
possibility of providing a street connection to Hellman Avenue aligned
with the approved cul-de-sac, street on the west side (TT 13813). This
requires that Parcel 2 be extended southerly so that its southerly parcel
line aligns with the north right-of-way line of the cul-de-sac street
(shown as dashed line on Exhibit "B"). The applicant prefers that Parcel
2 be the minimum size necesscry to contain the existing house and yard,
Uerefore, not extending southerly as requested by staff. Special
Condition No. 7 requires the option suggested by staff, but allows the
parcel line to be locate°d as requested by the Applicant if a master plan
is submitted and approved by staff prior to approval of the Final Parcel
Map.
With the parcel map, the developer will widen Hellman Avenue and place
the existing overhead utilities underground across Parcels 2 And 3. Any
cross-lot drainage between Parcels Z and 3 shall also be eliminated.
Improvements fronting Parcel 1 will be deferred until its development.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial
Stu . to con acted a field investigation and completed Part II of
the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are
anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore] issuance of Negative
Declaration is appropriate.
IV. CORRESPONDENCES Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding
property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the
site has also been completed.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TENT. PM 12218 NIX DEVELOPMENT' u
MAY 10, 19$9
PAGE 3
V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider
l input and elements of .the Tentative: Parcel Map 12218. If after such
consideration, the Commission can recommead approval, then the adoption
of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would
be appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
Barrye R.. Hanson
S2nior Civil Engineer
BRN:BM:sjm
Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A") ,
Tentative Map (Exhibit "B")
Master Plan (Exhibit"C")
Resolution and
Recommended Conditions of Approval'
I
F
�N a
IMwwueu►� is i� � � ..
-� -: :NIiNIl1 Nllllt�!
■.r_ ` sra . IiHlNINIII�INII illlill �,
.� � � ��i �IIIIIN/t1111lNNtss ®® _
i� " •� - .: illlllllllllllllrl
�tHi�11�it
lin
NOW
1p11f11
.�Ina ■_I I�tilir r
..: :1� �1��` �� r�� s®� � �' ■.fir �
N
Origi al Poor Quality>',
t. - J rn
Lot Line p d �/
s 4 In a
�t
LZ
I ,-lH
„�._ J t tt• r t � s r �. . � • ii �o2"Z.7Z
i"_ ►OQ
CITY OF PAULU MR 12<21
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLa. TENTATIVE M A P
YTS:
ENGW G DIV NION d
Original Poor Quality
'7P
't
CITY OF • PAR.CLL. MAP !2.2.1 S
ENGIK4MING DIMOta
a_ �
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THEPLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 12218, LOCATED ON THE EAST
SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, SOUTH OF 19TH STREET, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN 202461-35, 39 AND 40
WREREAS, 'Tentative Parcel Map Number 12218, submitted by H x
Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 3 parcels, the
L real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
06rnardino, State of California,, identified as APNis;. 202-061-35, 39 and 40,
located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, south of 19th Street; and
WHEREAS, on May 10, 1989, the Planning Commission held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above-described map.
f NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION' RESOLVED AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTi=x1 1: That the following findings have been made:
1. That toe map is consistent with the General Plan.
2. That the improvement of the pronosed subdivision is
consistent with the General Play..
3. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed development.
4. That tr_ proposr-' subdivision and improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage, public
health problems ar have adverse affects on abuttiag
pror,irty.
SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certif-es that the ,project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Enviroi-=ental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission herEby issues a Negative-
Declaration.
SECTION 3 That Tentative Parcel Map No. 12218 is hereby approved
subject die attached Standard Conditions and the following Special
Conditions:
Special Conditions:
1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the
east side of Hellman Avenue,shall be undergrounded along the portion of
the project frontage extending from the first pole offsite north.of Parcel
3 to the first pole offsite ,outh of K,rcel 2, prior to public -aprovement
acceptance. The develop?•.' may request a reimbursement agreement to
recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future
redevelopment as it occurs on the opposite side of the street,
PLANNING COMMIISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TENT.. PM1 2PIS - NIX DEVELOPMENT
MAY 10, 198:
E
�. PAGE _
2. Facilities-shalt be installed to ei'iniinate cross lot drainage from Parcel
3 to Parcel 2, to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division
prior to recor.;'atton of the Final Parcel Map,
3. Parcel 1 'shall accept drainage from Parcels 2 and 3 on the Final Parcel
Map. Upon development of Parcel 1, facilities shall be installed su;:h
that Parcel 1 shall drain only to public facilities or to private drainage
easements of record.
4. An offer of dedication for a corner prone :y fine radius shall be placed
on tha southwest corner of Parcel Z.
I , ,I
5. The development of Parcel 1 will require the installation of adequate
downstream drainage facili:ios,
6. Drainage/flood protection measures shall be provided along Hellmw Avenue
as shown necessary by the final drainage study.
7. The south parcel line for Parcel 2 shall align with the noy" right-of-way
line for the street within Tentative Tract 13813 on nest side of
Hellman Avenue. However, th. line may be located shown on the
Tentative Parcel `•.dp proposed by the applicant, if a master plan not
requiring the street connection to Hellman Avenue is submitted to and
approved by the Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to approval of
the Final Parcel Map.
I,
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 1989,
PLANNING COMMISSIOP OF` THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
i
BY: `Tarry TT.`fq- ` - a rman
ATTEST;
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regular7v introduced, passed, end adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the loth day of May, 1989, by the following vote-to—wits
AYES: COMMISSIONER,;
: J
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: l
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i
l
01-19inal Poor Quality
cv
'�� I .r.'. as♦ a n �„� `u E.oS
RO`■ y=p=. q W Y L -.V� �p y.+ a V. Y r C
clq
»
p l V N^ M
M V
Y � U HIS =11
$i T.. r.2 Tr a.^s
$ Y; Sys€■i�poii 4'*' vy } �
-v k q h .T.`p
r
yp yeV m. Q ��G1M' do q LRC. LtV
�^IgZ� NR�.
v ckc VV V a� YY Vyq �. :—.
Y. u4a. 97l. R'� . ��' N i�►. C
g■ uu+a ..
acw ao►.a 6a► uuo u$s ..;v«
v
■ ! .� N rl � N 1q h � a JV
V M I1
c_
cfJ
6W TC 'dd beY �U t�}'g poor
zz
yy i
9N �uA CIO u0i abu p�`
bn f�o vc o
Ni qE Y. O C� Ou.O. p,
w.;pk�S
N
41
Wa M� M SKy min. pc .50
Q
N t1 ♦" .fl N Y N !'1
e � Io�� I � WrIIL
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
o
F_ tZ
DATE: May 10, 1989 y1977--�'I'
TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner
I SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '- various amendments to e , e
Subdivisicn r Hance, regarding appeal periods, approval
periods, and extensions.
I. ABSTRACT: This report presents certain changes to the Subdivision
r,aii fiance to make.the map process consistent with the ;State
`li—thdivision Map Act and the process for all other entitlements
(i.e. CdP's, Development Reviews).
' Iy. BACKGROUND:
A. �A�ppp��e_al�s° the Subdivision Ordinance currently provides for a
T' _ '(15) day period to file an appeal of the Planning
Commission's action regarding a tentative tract or parcel
map. The State Map Act, Section 66452.5, states that an
appeal shall be.filed within 10 days after the action is taken
by the Planning Commission. Further, the ity's Development
Code establishes. a 10-day appeal period for all other
entitlements, such as Conditional Use Permits ad Development
Reviews. Since a project may have both a `tract Pap and a
Design Review, it would seem logical to allow for a-consistent
appeal period.
B. Approvals: The Subdivision Ordinance states that the approval
o a en tive tract map or parcel map shall expire 18 months
frown the date of the Planning Commission's approval Section
66462.6 of the State Map Act establishes that tentative maps
shall expire 24 months after approval. Again, the City's
Development Code establishes a 24-month approval period for
Conditional Use Permits and Development Reviews. The proposed
amendment would provide for a consistent 24-month approval
period.
C. Extensions The approval period may be extended by the
>sl'anning—Commission upon request ;by the developer. The
Subdivision Ordinance currently all . , maximum extension of
24 months. The State Map Act, Section 66452.6, allows for up
ITEM
PLANNING CfiMISSION STAFF REPORT
RE: MUNICIPAL CODE AhENDMENT
May 10, 1989
Page 2
to 36 months of er„tensien.,, StaFf is recommending that the
City's Subdivision Ordinan4 ; be amended to allow up to 36
months of extension.
III. ENVIRONMEJTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Environmental
ec s aria roundno significant adverse environmental impacts
as a result of this project. ,-0 the Commission concurs with these
findings, the issuance of a',,Negative' Declaration would be irr
order.
IV. RECOWENDATION staff recommends that the Planning Commission
adopt a atfa hod Resolution recommending approval to the City
Council.
Res'pactoly sr d,
f
Brad er
City PI nner
BB:DC:ko
Attachments: Resolution
nedinance
\t 1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTI"J OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAAGA, CA; IFORNIA, RECOMMENDI P. APPROVAL OF AN,
AMENDMENT TO TITLE 16 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL-
CODE REGARDING SUBDIVISIONS, AND: KKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
WHEREAS, on the 10th day of May, 1989, the Planning Commission held a
duly advertised, public hearing pursuant to: Section 65864 of the California
Government Code
SECTION 1 The Rancho Cucamonga Planning 'Con►aission has made the
fol l owing findings:
1. That the State Subdivision Map Act, Section 6452.5,
states that an appeal shall be filed within)10 days
after the action is taken by the planning
Commission; an6_
2. That the State Subdivision Map Act, Section 66452.6,
establishes_ that the approval of a tentative map
shall expire 24 months from the date of the Planning
Commission`s,approval;_and
3. That the State Subdivision Map Act, Section 66452.6,
provides for extensions of up to 36 months: for
tentative maps.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that
this pra ec w not create a significant adverse effect on the environment
and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on h-,.V
10, 1989.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Section 6585', to 63855 of the
Califar.i& Government Code, that the Planning
Commition of .!the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
rearzwnds approval of the attached Ordinance.
2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council - approve and adopt the attached
Ordinance to modify the Municipal Code.
PLANNING COMMISSION'RESOLUPION NO.
RE: MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT
M j 10, 1989
Page 2
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY, 1989.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA
BY:
arry T. Mcffle), 1 rman
( ATTEST:
Brad Buller, cre ary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Piannin� Commission field
on the loth day of May, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERSr
ARL
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: qP
s-:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDMANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDINF SUBDIVISION$
THE CITY COUNCIL-OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS;
SECTION 1: Section 16.16.130 of Chapter 16.16 is amended to read as
follows
"16.16.130 appeals--By Subdivider. If the subdivi,ier'disagrees with
anyacton bthe nning'Conviiission with respect,to the tentative
subdivision map, she may, within ten days of, �� �'Mi3 an 'file an
appeal with the City Clerk. The Council' shall con'iider the appeal
within thirty days unless the subdivider consents � o a
continuance. This appeal shall be a hearing with 6tice to the
iubdivider and the Planning Commission, and upon conclusion of the
naarirg, the Coellcil shall, within ten days, declare its findings.
The Council may sustain, modify, reject or overrule any
recommendations or rulings of the Planning Commission and may make
such findings as are not inconsistent with the provisions of this
title or the State Subdivision Map Act."
SECTION 2 Section 16.16.140 of Chapter 16t,16 is amended to read as
follows:
"16.16.140 Appear--By Interested Persons �A. Any member of City
Councilor City zzatt or any n eres a **son affected by a
decision of the Planning Commission, may file a complaint with the
City Council concerning such decision. Any such complaint shall be
filed with the City Clerk within ten days after the action which is
the subject ofthe.complaint. No complaint shall be considered
after the ten-day period. The City Council shall set the matter for
hearing. The hearing shall be held within thirty days after the
Filing of the complaint pursuant to the procedures contained in
Section 16.16.130, with additional notice being given to the
affected interested persons.
B. ion conclusion of the hearing, the City Council shall,_-::vthin
ten'dayrs, declare its findings based upon the testimony and
documents produced before it. It may sustain, modify, reject or
overrule any recommendations or rulings of the Planning Commission
and may make such findings as are not inconsistent with the
provisions of this title."
t
S
CITY COUNCIL 69DINANCE NO.
RE: TITLE 16 AMENDMENT
Page 2
SECTION 3: Section 16.16.150 of Chapter 16.16 is amended to read as
follows:
1116.16.150 Appeal--Far General Plan and Specific Plan Conformity.
Annferestea person may appeal any decision of the Planning
Camnission relative to conformity to the General Plan or any
Specific Plan of the City -to.the City Council within ten days of
approval or conditional appMoval. Such appeal and hearing thereon
shall be in accordance with $Action 16.16.130.11
SECTION 4: Sections 16.16.160, Subsection d, of Chapter 16.16 is
amended to pea as ollows:
'116.16.160�'xpiration. A. The approval o}, conditional approval of
sUDOlvision rap shOl expire twenty fo^.r months from the
date of the adoption of the renlllu;ion by the planning Connissir*.,
approving or conditionally appt,4Jv+rl9 the map. An extension to the
expiration date may be approvedl,,��s provided in Section
16.16.170(6)."
SECTION 5: Section 16.16.170, Subsection C, of Chapter 16.16 is
amended to rea3"as follows:
, i
"Time Limit of Extension. C. Extensions may be granted for a
peR od or per —not eneeding a total. of thrae years.'
follows: SECTION 6: Section 16.20.070 of Chapter 16.20 is amended to read as
"16.20.070��A��ppppe��a��l_s---__Byy Subdivider. If the subdivider disagrees with
any ac Ion by the ann n�i a Cemm'tssion withr respect to the tentative
map, he may, within ten days of the receipt of such decision, appeal
such action to the City Council in accordance with Section
16.16.130."
SECTION 7: Section 16.20.080 of Chapter 16.20 is amended to read as
follows:
i
"16.20.080 Appeals--By Interested Persons Adversely Affected. Any
Interesd person adversely'"afrecteed`byy a decis of n of the Flanning
Cowl,ssion with respect to the tentative parcel map may, within ten
days of such decision, file an appeal with the City Clerk in.
accordance with Section 16.16.140,
SECTION 8: Section 16.20.090 of Chapter 16.20 is amended to read as
follows
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE 90.
RE: TITLE 16 AMENDMENT
Page 3
J�,20`.0990�E_xpi_rati_on. The approval or conditional approval of the
fitive pa— rceT map shall expire twenty-Four months from the date
of adoption of the resolution Uy the Planning Commission approving
or conditionally approving the map. The expiration of the approved
or conditionally approved tentative parcel map shall terminate all
proceedings and no parcel map of all or any,portion of the real
property included within such tentative P,rcel'map shall be filed
without first processing a new tentative pi)rcel. map.
SECTION 9: Section 16.L0.100, Subsection �,, of Chapter 16.20 is
amended tore—ad"as-foliows;
t;
Time Limit of Extension. C. Extensions may be granted for a period
or periods not excee ng a total of Ohree years.
SECTION Io ="ity Council declares that, should any provision,
section, paragraph, sentence or word or this ordinance be rendered or declared
invalid by any final court action in a court of :ompetent Jurisdiction, sir by
reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions„ sections,
paragraphs, sentences, and words of this ordinance shall remain in full' force
and effect.
SECTION 11 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance a a cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after itr. ss adoption at least once in The Daily Re ort, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City or Ontario, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE; May 10, 1989
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
G
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT 89-185 DOLAN - An appeal of staffs
decision to deny a Home cups on rmit for a multi-track
recording studio located it the Low Density Residential
District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) at 9292 Arrow Route -
AP N: 208-�361-19.
I. BACKGROUND: On-April 10, 1989, Michael Dolan submitted an
app ca on fora Home Cccupation Permit to a11ow amulti-tracking
recording studio within his home at 9292 Arrow 'Raute (see Exhibit
"A"). The applicant indicated that there would be use of an 8-
track recorder, a 2-track recorder, an amplifier, keyboards and
other electronic and non-electronic musical equipment.
Soundproofing material has been applied to the walls, ceiling and,
floor. Further, the applicationi stated that' recording would
involve individuals and small groups of 2-5 people, 1 to 3 times
per week between the hours of 1200 noon and 9:00 p.m. Staff
subsequently denied the application.
II. ANALYSIS: Home occupation is defined by the Development Code as:
"Home Occupation: An accessory occupational use
conducted Dy a resident of �2 dwelling as a secondary use
thereof, which is clearly'incidental to the use of the
structure for dwelli% .purposes, and which ,does not
change the character thereof, and for which there is no
display, no stock in trade, no commodity sold on the
premises, and no mechanical equipment used except that
necessary for housekeeping purposes".
Applications for Home Occupation Permits are evaluated on the
basis of 14 specific criteria, to assure that such occupations are
compatible with the residential character of the surrounding
neighborhood. The most pertinent criteria are listed below:
"The use shall not allow customers or clientele to visit
dwellings. However, incidental uses such as music
lessons, and the sale of fruits and vegetables, may be
" permitted if the intensity of such instructions is
approved by the City Planner."
I3'ETS L
[ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF .REPORT
RE; HOP 89-I85 DOLAN
May 10, 1989
E
Page 2
C?
E
"No persons other than mtobers of the family who reside
f on the premises shall be engaged in such activity."
"There shall be no change in the outward appearance of
the building or premises, or other visible evidence of
the activity. "
"No equipment or processes shall be used on the subject
property which creates noise, smoke, glare, fumes, odor,
vibration, electrical radio, or television interference
disruptive to surrounding properties."
Staff reviewed the proposal and determined the use would not
conform to the above criteria for the following reasons:
o UP to 15 clients could visit the residence during the
week, resulting in an intensity of use which would be
incompatible with the primary residc,tial use of t'-,e
neighborhood. In allowing incidental uses such as nuiw
lessons, the intent of t)e Nome Occupation criteria is
to permit individualized instructions not a group
environment. Also, pr.rking constraints which result
from a group meeting at a residence would not normally
be an issue for individualized music instrt, Lion, since
students typically are driven to and from lessons by a
family member.
o up to 15 persons other than :aaiil members residing on
the premises will be engaged in the. Horne Occupation
activity. The resultant increase in traffic would not
be consistent with the primary use of the site for
residential purposes.
o The increase in traffic/parking to the residence would
result in visible evidence of the Home Occupation.
o The applicant states that the recording equipment is
"the equivalent to normal home stereo equipment".
Rather than debate whether an 8-track recorder is
"`normal" for a home stereo system, staff focused on hoar
the use would comply with the City"s noise
regulations. The applicant felt that they could comply
because they are using 75 watt speakers with normal
amplification and have installed "soundproofing
material" to the recording studio room.
equipment and musical instruments that the recording
The Cit s noise standard, require
instruments shall not create a
s disturbance on any surrourt bg property. }noise
disturbance is defined as an exterior ambient noise
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
RE: HOP 89-185 - DOLAN
May 10, 1989
Page 3
level greater than 6Od8A betateen 7:00 a.m. and 10:00
p.m., or 560A between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Normal
home stereo equipment can easily achieve noise levels in
excess ^f these limits. The attached chart (see Exhibit
110") illustrates comparative noise levels for common
sounds, such as a stereo playinq softly (40dBA).
The applicant has not submitted any scientific data to
support the claim that the soundproofinn material
already installed will achieve the deli ed nose
limits. Further, the effectiveness of any sound
attenuating material is dependent on a "closed-roars"
environment, that is to say, no open windows or doors.
Noise level enforcement is difficult to enforce, because
it requires constant monitoring and Violators must be
"caught-in-the-act". Also, noise problem whicv► occur
after 5,00 p.m. and before 8:00 a.m. are dependent on
the Sheriffs Department for enforcement wKu are not
equipped for noise monitoring.
II. SUMMARY: On April 19, 1989, the applicant appealed *taff's denial
AML of Horie Occupation Permit 89-185 (see Exhibit B . . In the
applicant's appeal letter, the applicant states that soundproofing
exists in the rocm utilized for the recording studio, Further,
the applicant has indicated he is willing to modify his .•equest to
allow only one customer per day,
r Despite the applicants willingness to modify his proposal, staff
believes that the use cold create compatibility problems with the
surrounding neighborhood and become a difficult enforcement
problem.
III. 'RE OM,Mr, PION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
r s decision to deny Rome Occupation Peys:it 39-185
th u doption of the attached Resolution of Denial.
r
R spect submigte ,
Brad u er
City P anner t
BB:�:ka
Attachments, Exhibit "A" - Home Occupation {permit 89-185
Exhibit "B" - Letter of Appeal
Exhibit "C" - Location Map
Exhibit "0" - Sound Lever rraph
Resolution of Denial
ffME,
City of Rancho Home Occupation
Cucamonga Permit A pilcatic&
+Go- GENERAL
® 7�9
SEO,{OMEO GUPATiON ltjG�1 "46 LC1AIy�t7yjg f38ff}//(INESS F' CS/"AC, iss
z rin -e
OWNER ❑ RENTER -
z' Property owner's signature will be required,or
< a signed Statement from the owner approving
..� such use of the dw)lling must b submitted
a with PIS application.
Property Owner's Signature:
FULL DESCRIPTION 8F PROPOSED BUSINESS—BE SPECIFIC / _s
CLLWU
P// c�//r�s ��S c^ Mtr - J`din�-� cn }ry S/Ott3
Aft
LU
BE SPECIFIC 1Qk OF BUSINESS:AcT ITY O=AJ iNG JN OWES I ING,INCLUDING.EQUIPMENT AND AMOUNT OF 13WELUNG USED—
++�� 8E SP,frC{iyF,G /
UL
� . Ia.. Ltl,�(it�rftrt� ' 3-!C' ���� r S®taflt7 E°A �t t Pcrn'�f�
0 lJe i + tsC;ne gy)
CAS arr�a-�S. wi t! J7l QeAIZL(
t hereby certify that t have read the Hotne Occupation Permi# requirements, fully understand the
r
implications,and Can comply with all of these requirements.
a r
Ui
- DATE-
r A.
.,y t•t��ter a��,
To; Plamdng Commission April 19, 1989
From: Michael J. Dolan
Re: Home Occupation Perrot Appeal
Dear Planning Commission,
I have submitted a Home Occupation Permit Application; and revised
that application to comply with the City's code. I am appealing
the planning departments denial of my permit because I believe
my revised proposal satisfies the code requirements.
The business in question is a mutitrack recording studio, designed
for individual ertists to record songs and,'cr deronstration
tapes,. In this appeal I will discuss my studio looition, the
soundproofing and equiptr.p-it and the frequency of cim9tomer 'visitation.
My home is located on the-corner of Arrow 1?qute ae. Hellman*Avenue.
The sttu:o is on the far end of the house, cic*a-st to the street
and farthest from all of the neighbors, Across the street from
the house is an indusfxiall commercial area.
To eliminate sound'entry and escape; soundproofing :mterial
has been added to the room the studio is located in. This room
measures 10' X 201 in a house of approximately 1300 sq. ft.
my neighbors have never noticed any'sound coming from the studio
when I have done personal recording. The equip ue t in the
studio is the equivalent to n,_=a;l home sterio equiptmiant, The speak-
ers are 75 watts, which is less than most home steric, speakers I_DO
200 watts) and therefore produces A.-:lower volume of sound. The
amplifier I use is a normal Kenwood sterio amplifier. All other
equiptment is connected to this main system and does not produce
any outside sound. In addition, to record good quality sound on
tape, volume is not needed or desired.
No sound or radio waves are pLoduced that will disrupt agpliences
(ie. TV, radio, autcanatic garage doors, etc.). No sound will be
,)roduced winch would be detected by neighbors passers by or the
(2ity in general.
Finally, our or.Lqinal request asked for, individuals as well as
soil groups of 2-5 to be allowed. I-realized the City's concern re-
garding the groups ar." therefore modified my regaest to only one
f individual custor--_r per day. I believe that with the technology
I have available I will be more than able oo=sati.sitgy�customers.
I believe this is comparable to, or even more desirable than the
permitted rdano or swimming lessons or produce sales which all
allow several customers coming and going each day. The freouency
of custrrkrs coming to my residence t%,111 not be raticeable since there
will only to one customer per day,
r
2
Ir. conclusign, I VOrk a full ti.m job, therefore, this will kre
a part-time business ot;erating only a 2ew days a week. In adC11tion, I aft,
the stv-' o*Mill only be in operation for a feW hours each day it
is rr ca,ng. Although it is not financially feasible at the pres
er' , I eventually plan to move the studio to a, more appropriate
core A clal,location.
As a result of my eagerness to.conply`with the City'.s code,, I hope
you will return a favorable response. :I look forward to being
a vieble umber to the Ranc»Cacamonga business co==iity. if
you need any farther information,:please feel free to contact ma at
945-3574. Thank you for your time and consideration.
sincerely,
Nlicha?.l J. Dolan
9292 �v, Route
Ranckio cacaWnga, Ca 91730
l
i
i
LL
®s rp
Llp�q
NORTV .
ATY OF ITEM: NOP 99•18S
RANCHON TITLE: ►..=r: -rocs ��� �
,w
Sgurel
4 ter 1 OMIT`f wsdcY Com.an Sounds inDscitws
Chap test
Basic overview of the somecommoh'easityreaoonizedsoundsare '
Envir�onmentai,WiseProbiem tisrtideC OW In rderotCncreasingsound
ntdnsitylevelsindecibels.Thesoic�g�1�
q 'IleIor oceuPied rooms are tyP
OtIt.,jalordesk9n,y levels only and do not represent
Sublectiye
introduction oselbels(de)" Evaluations
Background Exama es 140
Delfaltionan Scope of the Noise Near lot engine
Problem 130
The air around us Is et most of us ntly Quid "Mrashold ol; rt oeatening
with sounds,y we are surroundeu 120
probably not say
by noise.What then is the difference
between ordinary sound and what we
call noise?The traditional dotin(tlon (il:111 �
band a 110
of noise is that it is"'unwanted few feet away
becomeb Accelerating inptorcy'Cle ate equals noise at e .a
souncwhen it either1interfe es With oared tNoteeso it floss motorcy r
about 2000 r�3r,_ ..a 100
1 at aueraftl
normal activities such as sleeping, It from a A ang ire i
9�D
conversation or recreation,when it Loud auto horn at 10 tt away N; Very Loud
causes actual phvsical harm such as _ . 90
earinghealthPAs we.have become aa effects n _
mentaland as NoisY-urbanstreet
more urbanized country �o
technt:4 h=s advanced,the level Of Notsy tnatoryAwk
sour.aint when it sometimes does School
...
the p t oud
the se point
e n I sometimes at oe and School cafeteria wiuntre ated surfaces 70
physical and p Y ed a noise
thus we have develop Stenographic roar
problem.(See Figure 1 for a listing of 60
common sounds.) Range of sPeeci'
The dimenslons of the noise Near freeway auto traNic Moderate
problem have
rowncades�Ines 1974
over the p
Annual Report,The Council on
Environmental Quality statod population is Average office
"nearly hail the tJS pop yp
regularly exposed to levels of noise
that interfere with..normalexposeed to�11 soft radio music 1n apaFment
and about"1 in 10. ,� 30 Faint
noise:of duration and intensity ...
sufficient to Cause,a pe o hear"
Average residence without stereo Alaying
reduction in tt:eir ability 20
Average whisper Very t2Srd
10
Rustle of leaves in wind
Human breathing
Q
Threshold of audibility
e valusa as measured do th.A• `
•de are"averand�r+ei meter fr
iCain Of a sou �,�.....-
1 IFrdm ContaPrs rn ArefirletruratAtausou:M.
oawtd
MCGnw
Egan.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THEjCITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING HOME UFJPATION
PERMIT NO 89-185 FOR A MULTI-TRACK RECORD%d STUDIO
LOCATED ,4 9292 ,ARROW ROUTE IN THE ':UGf DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (24 DWELLING VNM'i`PFA ACRE) -
APO, 200-381 19 AND MAKING FINOINGS 1: sOPPW THEREOF
k Recitals.
(1) Michael Dolan has filed an application for the issuance of the
Home Occupation Permit, No. 89-185 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter, in this Resolution, the ;;object Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application".
(ii)= On the 10th day of May 1989, the Planning,Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on 'the
application and concl'!ded said hearing on tttA date.
(III) All legal prerequis'' as to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution,
NOW, THEREFORE,, it is hereby ,!fund, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho rucamonoa as: follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth Yn the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial, evidence presented to this Commission
during tine above-referenced public hearing. on May 10, 1989,' ncluding written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at 9292 arrow
Route with a street frontage of (,.5 feet and lot depth of 120 feet and is
presently improved with a 1,300 square foot single family residence; and
(b) The proper y to the-north of the subject site is single
family residential, the property to the south of that site consists of
industrial building, the property to the east is single family residential, ,
and the property t) the west is single family resideni.ial, and
l
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
Q' RE, HOP 89-�185 - DOLAid
May 10, 1984 .
Page
(c) The application for., the Home Occupation Permit
contemplates a 200 square foot multi-track recording studio, including 8-track
and 2-track recorders;amp'jiifier, keyboards and other musical instruments, and
75 watt speakers. F'urt6er, the application contemllates one individual
recording customer per dal between 'the hours. of 12;00 norn and 9:nQ p.m.
}; 3. Based upon the s°jbstantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the ,specific findings of
facts set forth in paragrriphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That fhe proposed use is not in accord with the General
Plant the objectives of teie Development Code, and the purposes of the district
in which the site is located; and
(b) That the propo:d use will be detrimental to the public
health, safety., or welfare, or to properties or
improvements in the vicinity; ,,nd
(c) Thata the proposed use does not comply with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code; and
(d) That the proposed use is inconsistent with the intent of
the fo'lowing mandatory conditions of operation for home occupations, as set
forth in Section 17.04 MO of the Rancho Cucamonga ibncipal Code:
1) That customers or clientele will be visiting
the dwelling.
2) That persons other than family members will be
involved in the activity.
3) That increased traffic to the residence and
parking will cause visible evidence of the
activity.
4) That equipment and processes will be used than..;
will create noise oe vibration.
f4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paratz^3ph
r 1,, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application.
f �
S. The Sicretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
RE: HOP 99-185 - DOLAN
May 10, 1989
Page 3
I
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS LOTH DAY OF MAY,_1989.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning 'Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular 0,1eting of the Planning Commission held
on the loth day of May, 1989, by the folfhming vote-to-wit:,
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSr
l
-j A BSI
_" s�� � �
,� / G� a
,•
�•f• � x�
r �
f,�
� �' .Is i� i � s � / � �
�� f � � /i
�� / � �� � �
J ,', 1 f _ �� !f � �
1
� � / � /,/ � '. i r
i` � •�
i �
,� r
� � � �
,,i" / �,
1 ,T+
t r'; r 1 w S •t
opt, ��y u� T _s •�. S a �� F 1..,' � „;
+f Y f <
Y �
7,+.J�i.
c
Original Poor
tl
rp
a •,Y w--m^.:... r a'-9�,�Jrf '�� r Y'�.,5 � # 't,b z .s h�"w_ '
6 ati f'
.ryy
y
4Y G+
{a
a®ti ri ak
NY yt ti'
� a � as ✓ti��&� 1 �T.
r w�yy 1
3
�
�e1�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA
STAFF REPORT
i
DATE: May 10 1989
TO: Chairman and Member-of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller; City Planner
BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: CR 85.02 DRAFT SAN BERNARDiNO COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE
MANAGEMENT - requesty e county ors'Wfy
approva o e plan for the monitoring, han(ling,
reduction, treatment, transportation, and disposal of
hazardous waster materials in San Bernardino County in
conformance with AB2948 (Tanner).
i. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is to provide the Planning
oZ`�ssibn with information about the proposed Draft County
Hazardous Waste Management Plan (see attached Executive
Summary). No action is required by the Planning Commission at
this time. However, actions will be required daring 1990 to
Implement this plan.
11. BACKGROUND: The Counts DeD,artment of Environmental Health
rSe E-es—Was completed the drdit plan and requests City Ckirz�;i
consideration of the Plan before June 1, 1989. Consideration of
the Plafr is s6leduled for public hearing by the City Council an
May 17, 1989.
Approval by the Cities is concurrent with approval by the County
Board of Supervisors. If the plan is approved, it will be
forwarded to the State for review. After the State approves the
plan, cities will have six months (180 days) to do one of the
following:
1. Incorporate the applicable portions of the approved County =-
Plan,by reference, into the City General Plan;
2.. ,Dvict an ordinance or ordinances implementing the County Plan
titthin the City;
3. Adopt a City Hazardous Waste Management Plan containing all
the elements: required by the Tanner Act and which is
consistent with,the approved Plan.
XTEM it
PLANNING CCMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CR 8942 HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
May 10, 1989
Page 2
Implementation actions by the rity are anticipated to occur
between January and July of 1990. Those actions may require a
General Plan Amendment, as well as adoption of ordinances.
The Planning Commission will be asked to review and implement the
applicable portions of the plan as part of the implementation tier
of actions in early 1990.
III. ANALYSIS: Until a County Plan is approved, the State retains
au or. Y for siting hazardous -su facilities.
Plan approval has the effect of transferring standards for siting
hazardous waste facilities from the State to the local
jurisdiction. An approved plan enables cities within a county to
adopt more restrictive standards for land use approvals,
specificalia:
(Legislation) does not limit the authority of any City
to attach appropriate conditions to the issuance of any
land use approval for a hazardous waste facility in
order to protect the public health, safety, or welfare,
and does not limit the authority of a city to establish
more stringent planning requirements or siting criteria
than those specified in the county hazardous waste
management plan. (AB477, Health and Safel,r Code Section
25135.7).
Consistency: During the implemeptation tier of actions,
consistency between the County plan and City Development Standards
will be addressed.
Consistency is an example of the kind of issue which 'must be
resolved after a county plan is approved. Under the consistency
rule of the state legislation, the Rancho Cucamonga heavy
industrial land use area would be included within the County`s
plan. However, although heavy industry is a permitted use in
Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 15, the intensity of use
associated with a re!lional hazardous waste treatment facility is
not permitted..
The plan anticipates siting of large scale treatment facilities
which could be locatei in areas in the county zoned for heavy
industrial use, provided that all the siting criteria developed in
the plan are met.
City siting criteria more restrictive than County standards may be.
adopted by City action after the plan is approved. While County
siting criteria requires a risk assessment when an immobile
- i
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CR 89-02 HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
May 13, 1989 -
Page 3
pop0ation is located near a proposed facility, the City may
choose to exclude any treDtment facility within a one mile radius
of an immo'Aile population.. For a ale, ISP Subarea 15 includes
a(i imwbilb population which wj,A be housed at the West Valley
Ogitention Center near 4th Street and Etiwand% Avenue. (See '
Ellhihit "A" and "B").
IV. CONCLUSION: The County Hazardous Water Management Plan rst be
approved"before City actions to implement the plan cPn occur.
During the implementation tier of actions, the Planning Commission
will review the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan and
recommend implementation measures to the City Council. fie
r ' implementation phase is expected to occur between January and July-
1990.
Resp rally tte ,
Br e'
City annex
88:MB.mlg
Attachre�nts: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map
Exhibit "B" - One Mile Radius Map
Executive Summary
t
;t
UA
o
4s1418 r a I r
+ 1
--7
t
iv-
t
MAV5MIAL SPECi IC AZ4ri/
.S[JC1/3REA- t 5
NMH ..
CITY OF rrENI,.
RANC"O CUCA'V TPrL& 9—A1VC�IC} Luc,-UM64 VXCIARrY
/1F5 .A�Ar/ri _
•.w.we ee♦w -�►+eei•i++i +ei♦e•+•+a+e.•c �♦ �
•�'iY� •♦•�f !�tiei�s♦ie• +i"�e eis s*i+i��s
♦i!w•`� �1"pr��e►e�+eaarr♦w�L .tvfie.+ws.e+♦fcyw.a �G��/r ;
♦.� �a•��..�A�SF..♦••*1fi �i�i1!►°�✓i�+:�1 i4Y/�1.rw`♦'"o'. �� S �
e-a
�i• � is � ♦•♦♦♦s♦♦•♦•+ ♦. �
:a s t s e+++.+ s e•s e •iF ierc�+:4 f�fliee
., .fT � �►/ -�e.e+eee+•eedi a+a w�• ♦�e �A�►1 � ��
.�`Frei+i+iwniw••e•e+♦♦♦+�
9C d" Cl.efeeti ♦♦♦++�
1 � 4�•'O"' �;�-� its♦:•i
+w♦ew
1
s•
� i 1 ,
ExECUTIYE SUMMARY OF THE
SAKI BERNA RDI O COUNTY l
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANj'iGE MV1T PLAN
(R,ev Sed Draft)
MARCH 1989.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIROMrlENTt-I. HEALTH S x(VICES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE
SAN BERNARDINO COL' TY
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Revised Draft)
March 089
`tlt The information contained herein is a summary of each of the chapters in
the County of San Bernardino ItTvised:craft Iitazardous waste Management
Plan(CHWM!P). The goals'and policies/actions ars presented in entirety
after each chapter summary. Chapter ;Z has no recommended goals or-,'
policies, while Chapter ld includes a recommended schedule for
implement�ninn of CH9VW programs.
I
';', r—
E
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Proper hazardous waste management constitutes one of the state's major
environmental concerns. Statewide recognition of the need for better
methods of hazardous waste management came about by the intense media
attention on improper disposal practices. Hazardous chemicals play an
important role in our modern society. They contribute to the manufacture
of a vast array of consumer products (i.e., televisions, computers,
automobiles, and medicines) and the convenience of consumer services
(i.e., dry cleaners, automotive repair). While these goods.and services add
to our quality of life, they also cause the generation of hazardous waste.
Reducing our reliance on hazardous materials would reduce th;;generation
r of waste. Hazardous waste will continue to be generated, however, since
some materials have no substitutes. For this reason, a comprehensive
plan is necessary to identify and promote programa for the reduction of
hazardous waste and the safe iT anagtment of wastes that remain after
treatment o:recycling,
Ala 2949 (Chapter 1504.Statutes of 1986) and amending legislation SB 477
(Chapter 1107, Statutes of L987). A8 3206(Chapter 1389,Statutes of 1988),
AB 3209 (Chapter 378,Statutes of I989), and AB-34 (pending), recognized
the need to have a comprehensive program for management of wastes by
authorizing cou;aties to develop a local hazardous waste management plan.
The law has as its goals;
the safe and responsible management of hazardous wasi'e;
the effective siting of hazardous waste facilities that involves local
and state governments,the public,and private industry;and
the prevention of permanem hazardous waste disposal into the land
or emission in the air w thous .cset processing the waste by an
economically and technically feasible alternative technology.
On March 31, 1987 t1:c County of Srm Bernardino Board of Supervisors
authorized the prepriration of the County Hazardous Waste Management
Plan(CHWMP). A resolut,A was adopted and sent to the State D%�partment
of Health Services specifying the County's desire to prepare the CHWMP.
The Plan is consistent with state law and the Guidelines for Preparation
of Hazardous Waste Management Plc;*s prepared by the Department of
Health Services,June 1937.
A final copy of the CHWMP must be submitted to the California Department
of Health Services (DHS) by June .1, 1989. State law specifies that the
CHWMP must be approved by a majority of the cities within the County
which contain a majority of the population of the incorpofiated area of
the County. Once the Plan has been approved b DHS, the County has
180 days from the date the DHS approves the CHWMP to incorporate
applicable portions of the Plan by reference into the County's general
ES-1
rn
plan, or enact an ordinanc: requiring all applicable zoning, subdivision,
conditional use permit, and variance decisions to be consistent with the
CHWMP.
j The cities are also required by state law to adopt some 'form of a
Hazardous Waste Management Plan. The law specifies that eiti%Ds are
4° required to do one of the following: 1) adopt a City Hazardous Waste
Management Plan, which is consistent with`the CHWMP; Z) ingrtporate
applicable portions'of the CHWMP into the city's; general pli i, or 3)
enact an ordinance watch requires.;that all applicable zoning, subdivision,
conditional use permit, `and vari,+ince decisions to be consistent with the
applicable portions of the"`CHW4iP. State'law does not limit the city's
authority to attach conditions46'the issuance of a sand use application cr
to establish requirements or siting criteria: different from those identified
in the CHWMP. Any such conditions.or criteria established by a city
must be substantiated as necessary to protect the public health and safety
since the conditions or criteria may be appealed to the State Appeal
Board(SB 477,Chapter 1167,Statutes of 1987).
The CHWMP serves as the primary'planning document for the management
of hazardous waste in.San Bernardino County. It is an et=ent of the
County's General Plan' and is consistent with other elements of the
General Plan. .The CHWMP identifies the types and amounts of wastes
generated in the County, establishes'programs for managing these wastes,
identifies an application review process for the siting of specified hazardous
waste facilities, identifies mechanisms for reducing the amount of waste
generated in the County, and identifies goals and policies and actions for
hazardous waste management. The CHWMP was prepared with full and
meaningful involvement of the public. Information regarding the County's
CHWMP 'AAvisory Committee and public involvement efforts is presented
in the discussion on public participation,Chapter 13.
GOALS AND POLICES/AC-nON$
The County plan is intended to preserve the local land use process,
protect the local environment, and provide a framework for ensuring, that
needed facilities are eited. The following overall goals and policies/actions
are the widerlying goals used to develop the CHWMP,
Goals
G-I-I To protect the health and welfare of the public, environment,
and economy of San Bernardino County through a comprehensive
program that ensures' safe and responsible tivna'gement of
hazardous waste/material,
,i
G-1-2 To reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated in the
County;;by providing improved programs for hazardous waste
a
source(reduction and recycling.
G-1-3 To ensure proper management of hazardous waste/material by
identifying and encouraging safe and efficient methods for
ES-2
i
d ,
managing hazardous wastelmaterial and by providing for needed Ask
hazardous waste facilities in San Bernardino County.
0-1-4 To picvcnt hazardous waste from being permanently dispos.d
into land,,or emitted into the air without being processed by
an economically and technically feasible alternative technology.
G-1.5 To involve ,,the public, induS-ry, and government in
carnprehensiv;6rocess that develops solutions for the management,
and disposal of%)azardous waste.
G-1-6 To establish a fro,ework for the development of San Bernardino
County's share of� zardous waste facilities.
G-1-7 To recognize that g6nsumers,contribute to the.generation of
hazardous waste,.tbi:,sr limiting industrial growth is not an
appropriate means of-reducing. the County's commitment in.
hazardous waste management
G-1-8 TO encourage and develop public ,education programs on the
proper management and disposal of hazardous waste.
Policies/Actions
P/A-1-1 Because a need exists to augment cutrent programs for the
proper management of hazardous waste''and to address recent
legislation, this jurisdiction shall work -.yith industry and the Afillk
public in identifying safe and responsiile solutions for the
managemci-.and disposal of hazardous wash's
PIA-1-2 Because the CHWMP applies County-wide, the County and the,
cities shall work together to prepare and updae the�,,HWMP as
well as its implementing ordinances and to develop:and!&npiement
programs which reduce She amount Od toxicity of the,,rt,3zardous
waste generated in the County.,
P/A-1-3 Because the Southern; California liazirdous Waste Mf�nagement
Authority (Authority)provides an appropriate for,—.;a for local
inpl-' regarding the regional siting of hazardous 4,aste facilities,
this jurisdiction shall continue its pa•••`ipation ia(the Authority.
P/A-1.4 Because proper hazardous waste management`t`s one of the
MiLte's critical environmental ci'incerns, the q)"ty and the
cities shall work with,the Authority and the state, to address
regional and statewid,- planning issues as necessary to achieve
environmentally and economically effective hazardous waste
management on a local,regional,and statewide bars.
ES-3
CHAPTER 2
ons ING PROGRAt4S?F(?'R DEALING WITH
HAZARWUS.AA'ITRIALS:A:AI)HAZARDOUS WASTES
The County has several departments involved in hazardous material/waste
programs.. the Environmental Health 'Services Department, i w- Fire
Department,.the Lead Management 1 Department, the. County Agricultural
Comnissioner, the Solid'Waste r4ant izinent Department, the Public.Health
Department, the Sheriffs Office, and the District Attorney. Of these
departments, the EiAronmentai Health Services Department has
responsibility—for the majority of -programs which deal with hazardous
material and waste issuer„ The County Environmental Health Services
Department(DEHS)admhI�Oters over eight Programs related to�haaardous
waste and material manag;tmeim Some of these programs include the
generator permit program,N the underground storage tank program, the
hazardous materials handY,er program, the household hazardous waste
collection program, radiological4.2caith, water hygiene, and land use and
noise control. In addition, the DENS coordinates emergency response
activities and, through its Air pollution Control Distplm, DENS is
responsible for regulating and monitoring the air emissions from induzztry.
Other agencies involved in hazardous materials and wastes manny4ment
include; the South Coast Air Quality Mlanagemsnt"District, the Rr)gional
Water Quality Control Board,and Publicly Owned Treatment Works.'`
f
ES-4
;thy
CHAPTER 3
WASTE GENERATION LEVELS,FACILITY
INVENTORY,AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Comprehensive and data, on hazardous waste generation levels
and management practices are critical elements of w Hazardous Waste
Management Plan. A clear understanding of current wc,te generation and
management practices provides the basis for identifying program and
facility needs Comprehensive data provide a quantitative understanding
of -hat types and amount of hazardous waste are generated;. by whom;
why; and how it is treated and/or disposed. Analysis of the data wilt
identify opportunities for waste minimization. Knowledge of waste
generation levels and management practleaz'ilso serve as the basis for
developing or fine tuning regulatory compliance programs, as well aZ
educational and technical assistance programms. This information identifies
areas to emphasize in the training of regulatory compliance inspectors
and emergency respotiders.. Finally,current and projected waste generation
levels, when coupled with data regarding treatment capacity should
identify facility needs.
The primary source of Ote data presented in this chapter is,be California
Department of He-,dth Services(DHS)Hazardous Waste Infortt`ttion System
(HWIS). The HWIS tracks all manifested shipments of hazarouus waste in
California. The data regarding hazardous waste shipments into and out
of San Bernardino County during 1986 and 1987 were provided to the
County Depa :ment of Environmental Health Services(DENS) by the state;
This data was analyzed and supplemented with information from DERS
files, Biennia', Reports (as available), and telephone interviews with
individual generators,transporters and facilities(as necessary).
Current Waste_Gencration_Levels
The San Bernardino County hazardous waste generators ship aboat 65,000
tons of waste offsite (average of data for 1986 and IS47). The primary
industries that contributed to this waste generation include the primary
metal industries, utilities, and railroad_transportation. These industries
generate a variety of wastes including metal containing liquids, waste oil,
and baghouse wastes. The amount of wastes shipped offsite represent 5%
of the total waste generated: in the County. About 95% (or 1.2 million
tons) of the wastes are managed onsite at the place where they are
generated.
The County has two commercial facilities currently in operation(Chemwest
Industries and Broco, Incorporated). Based on a comparison of the '
existing capacity of these commercial facilities and the present required
treatment capacity, the County has excess capacity in other recycling, bitt
may need to have facilities for oil recovery,solvent recovery,incineraticm,
and stabilization. Further reduction or recycling of these wastes is
possible,which would lessen the demand for these facilities.
ES-5
i
Er_qi;ctl1 ion Levels
About 67,000 torts of hazardous waste are anticipated to be managed offsite
a the year. 7,,00. Of this amount, waste oil, bashou:e waste, and oily
sludge tare !,he largest categories of waste. 1'l.e industrial sources of
? this projected amount.-of waste are the same as culrrcgt sources.
The County will have a projected capacity deficiency for treatment and
recycling facilities. Chemwest Industri('s, the existing rec4lline facility,
has filed for closure and,will not function as a commercial facility,
Discussion,
The analysis of the data provides considerable insight ;into hazardous
waste management practices in San Bernardino_County-and provide the
bdsis for development of hazardoup. waste makarcment policies in;the
remainder of this Plan.
It is expected that an .increasing amount of the hazardous waste now
shipped offsite for treatment and/or disposal will in the future be managed
onsite. For example, one major generator of metal containing liquids has
obtained regulatory approval for onsite recycling operations, thereby
eliminating a significant Waste stream. Although this trend is anticipated,
the projections provided do not include an estimate of the extent of
change from offsite to onsite management. While Chapter 5 establishes a
framework for siting specified hazardous waste facilities, clearly the data
Affta establish a need for applying the siting critera J qnd land use review
procedures for onsite treatment and/or disposal" acilities as well. This
issue is addressed in Chapter 8 of this Plan.
GOALS AND POLICIE;rAC1'ai NS
Goals
G-:•1 To establish a comprehensive and accurate data base to assist
in program duvelopir -it and to assess facility capacity needs.
G-3-2 To ensure that the data base is maintained and updated regularly
so that program planning is based on current information.
Policies/Actions
PIA-3-1 Because current data coliectioa and management practices do
not allow easy compilation or interpretation, this jurisdiction
shall develop a comprehensive automated waste :racking system
that integrates data from all hazardous mattriais and hazardous
waste programs. The system shell be based on geographical,
physical and land use characte..idtics.
P/A-3.2 Because DHS in their comments on the Draft hazardous Waste
Management Plan requires that the County identify deficiencies
ES•6 {
1
1
and prioritize the manner in which the County will 'ddress
these deficiencies, this jurisdiction shall address the fol!uwing,:,
deficiencicsr
�1. Perform a waste minimization assessment of all major
hazardous waste producing industries and assist them
in achieving maximum waste minimization az zoeeified
in Chaptsr 4;
2 Identify industries subject to pretreatment requirements
and assist them in achieving compliance;
3. Include estfi ates of clean up wastes from Expenditure
Plan sites as;tiey become available.
PIA,-3-3 B6.ause improved data w-ild enable the County to ': 5,vlop
stronger polivy on hazardous Waste management and because
local concerns change, this jurisdiction shall update the data on
an annual basis and revise the `county Hazardous Waste
Management Plan at least once every, three years. The
background information and data shall be made <zcces-ibte to
other agencies and jurisdictions whenever possible:
ES-7
CHAPTER 4
WASTL"-MINIWZATION
Wast —�nimization is an uwarella term that refers to sours-k -eduction
;.,id recycling. Source Reduction is defined as any process t-.o reduces
or eliminates the amount of waste being generated, it usually includes
processes within the :nauufacturing or, operating system of a business.
Recycling refers to the use, reuse, ojr reclamation of a waste either
onsite or offsite after it is generated- by, a particular process. waste
minimization, as used by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
denotes the reduction, to the extent possible, of hazardous waste that is
generated or subsequently treated, stored, or disposed. It includes source.
reduction or recycling efforts that: 1) reduce the total volume or quantity
of hazardous waste, or 2) reduce the toxicity of hazardous waste, or
both. Of the two approaches to waste minimization, source reduction is
thepreferred method of reducing wastes.
Source reduction and recycling are identified as preferred waste reduction
options under the ETA's use of the term waste minimization, Treatment
technologies should be considered only after acceptable waste minimization
methods have been identified, This priority for waste reduction differs
from the State Department of Health a'ezvlces (DHS) preferred options;
the DHS includes treatment as a preferred waste reduction method, The
:o+Hy promotes the use of onsite treatment measures as a way of decreasing
a county's overall need for offsite facilities. The EPA priority is used in
this Plan because the County considers source reduction and recycling as
the optimum methods for reducing wastes.
San Bernardine County DEHS has had an informal waste minimization
program since 1983. The program has consisted of providing waste
reduction and management information to generators through the County
hazardous waste generator proaram, distribution of waste reduction
information through a quarterly P.�.esletter sent to'�'III hazardous waste
generators in the County, and co-sponsorship of a one-play waste reduction
orkshop with the Univercity of California Riverside Extension Program.
recycling of waste is strongly encouraged through the existing program.
Although present efforts to encourage and promote wast. r, 1zation
have been successful, tat expanded program is necessary to provide more
con,pr:hensive assistance to all industries, to document quantitatively the
value of these waste ta3nimization methods, to maintain personnel with
expertise in waste minimization as a resource for industry, and to ensute.
that local industry is taking full advantage of waste minimization.
opportunities. j
COALS AND POLICIESJACTh'INS
In order to reduce the overall amount o;: waste generated in San Bernardino
' I
^ryunty, an expanded waste n inimization program should be established.
ES-3
The following goals and policies/actions set forth guidelines for the
recommended waste miff mization program for the County.
Goals
G-4-1 To minimize the gF?oration of hazardous waste in San Bernardino
County,to the extent postiblt.
Policies/Actions
P/A-4-1 Because reducing tho amount of waste generated in this County
is an effective mechanism for.reducing thl potential impcct of
these wastes to the public health and safety and the
environment, and because legislation encourages the reduction,
to the -cxtcnt feasible, of hazardous waste, this jurisdiction
shall encourage and promote practices that will, in order of
priority: 1) reduce the use of hazardous materials and the
generation of hazardous waste at their sourco; '2) recycle the
remaining hazardous wastes for reuse;and 3) heat those wastes
which cannot be reduced at the source or recycled. Only
residuals from waste recycliert and treatment shall be land
disposed.
P/A-4-2 Because industry often lacks the technical information or its-
house expertise to develop waste minimization peograms, and
additional resources are necessary ,¢t :4ke local level to assist
industry in developing such progrnmt _thy:County shall expand
the waste minitization program to ineluide edt"`,tion, technical
assistance,economic incentives,and recognition t�ibments.
Educational materials and technical, assistance should be the
first priority of- :.t program. Such information and assistance
are the cornerstone to industry participation in waste
minimization effo-its. Other measures,like economic incentives
and recognition measures,should also be implemented, but these
are of a lower priority.
The program shall consist of, but not be limited to, tho
following components:
EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE;
E Develop an expanded educational program on waste
l min mutation that includes: 1) brochilres,publicatiors,and
a
poste»to ata;rt the public and industry on the importanet
of waste minimization as wg,11 .as .'describe appropriate
reduction technologies And 2) atidicvisual aids on waste
minimization that cap be: taken to businesses, trade
associations and public meetings.
Hold seminars and workshops for industry on waste
minimization techniques and regulatory 'sues. Some of
ES-9
these seminars or workshops could be co-sponsored with
local sniversities;Chambers of Commerce,or th. DHS,
Encourage trade associations and industry to form an,
industry task force to promote information exchange.
- Maintain library of technical roiarencc materials and
prepare a waste reduction resource directory,
TECHNICAL AMUSTANCE
Hire a waste minimization specialist to coordinate the
program implementation and provide on-goieg assistance to
generators on waste minimization tehr-iqucs.
ProvidC vtai{tg to hatsc,ous waste' general sr inspectors
on wast;4 minimizatioh techniques. The inspectors will
incorpo-Ate *taste minimization asses-meitts into routine
inspections and should be knowlel'aeable about the
effectiveness of these techniques.
Provide-waste audits on request and incorporate into
routine inspections,
ECONOWIC INCENTIVES
- Provide nformation on avuhability of pooled loan fund
and state grants ft 9tvelopins innovative technology
Red"e permit fees for firths 0-t achieve waste
minimization.
RECOGNITION OF OUTSTANDING PROGRAMS
- Develop a method for recognizing firms that h..ve achieved
notable success in reducing hazardous w,
Also,the program ;hall assist industry in preparing s;Cste and federal
waste minimization reports. A copy of the report sh, t be submitted
to the County DENS at the time of permit renewal so that an
annual ccport can be developed to measure the prog;-ss of waste
minimization efforts. The annual waste minimization rerott prepared
by DEHS shall identity activities undxrtakrn by the department and
provide soma indication of the-mount of hazardous wastes reduced
as a result of local efforts,
PJA-4-3 Because having the County conduct a waste minimization audit
is a voluntary wion by a business and those businesses 'that
participate may not be in full compliance with regulatory
requiremtnts,.the County shalt address violations as specified in
state Itw. The County shall develop in £onjur ction with the
flu District Attorney policies for deciding oa such viaiations
ES•1Q
Pursuant to the requirements set forth iti Section 15552 of tha
California He'Ith and Safety Code, The policies dcvcloped to
uddross such violations shall include, but not be lim—d_to, the
.follSw n,g:
1) Whether the uctiot; is a knowing, willful, negligent, or-'
Wadvertert violation; t
2) Whether the violator carets to the schedule of compliance
`gecified by the County;and
3), `Nhethor tre violation .was discnvered during i;a ocsite
consultation cavded out pursuant to this chapter.
Ix i'sddition, the Cpuntf;may take enfercemer+t action, or refer
the violation for ratfarcement action, ,its accordance with state`
law.
,j
ES-1 I
CHAPTERVAW
SITING OF SPECIFIED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILI'i°IES
Development of specified hazardous waste facilities requires permits from
state and local agencies. The State Department of Health Services is
responsible for issuing hazardous waste facility`permits and for ensuing,
that operating conditions impesed on the approval of a facility arc net.
It is the responsibility of local governments, however, to see that a
facility is sited in areas with compatible land uses, to ensure that
conditions of approval on land use,permits are implem.nted and carried
out for tn. duration of the project and to respond to hazardous
material/waste emergencies. At th-. local level, both discretionary and
ministerial land use permits would ba required. hocal land use authority
is derivea from police poWe`,c which were reserved to tht states by the
Federal Constitution and. delegated to cities and counties i,% California by
Article XI,Secti;1n 7 of the State t:,onstitution.
Outline of the Loral AoaJication Review Fra,sgg
�I
The types of applications required for local evaluation of a specified
hazardous waste facility are listed be ow. Th=, required local land use
permits include:
Application to Apply the Zoning Overlay of"Specifi•rd Hazardous
Waste Faci'.sty" to the project site and respective buffer (see
Policy P/A-3-d).
Site appr.,vatt application(Conditional Use Permitl`
SpecNI live Permit(issued by the County Environmental Health
Services Director, required its a condition of approval on the
discretionary permit)
Ministerial Permits from Building,Grading,Flood Control,etc.
A Site Approval (Conditional Us3 Po,mit), or applicob:c city application,
is necessary to site specified hazardous w,=.e facilities ir. '";tn Bernardino
County. Along with the Conditional Vsu Pr:mit application,an application
to apply the specified hazardous waste,furAlity zoning overlay is required
for all proposed spec.10k I hazardous waste faPIl=tr_►s. The overlay applies
to the project si:a aria associated iz=ffer. Requiring the overlay seitricts
future development to uses Cw are compatible with specified hazardous
waste facilities. .The County of San Bernardino Land Management
Department, Offis.z of Planning, or applicable City department would
process the 1rnd use c pplication. Other departm-,nts, such as the
i 7hc County o" Bazkaro,,Ao r fors to its discretionary
land use appl., A,+,proval". It is equivalent
to a Conditions. tit,, '-ian,
2
'��atS.M4` $SASA'1X1C2,tlt ratC in
t Wl.
tik^OCtvi�"%�8p1����t an• tEAn stvicvv ��y{i�hC
� ntai ea entit.t4 on:: tocai nppiic 1xtY prapos�`n beio��
irOtt'� d COfi es tS' tt f aC arm?tla "f
v.�viaW'sng otrnalti0n au WRVS i0us c?$d Sn .0o
ats �tio �toati. al
,ring'"1"kfIt eciticd arc sr► of the i ss for into,
fariajtiati$Bd Gxr by sFauni ittustr t��ustatt peter
A1fGDnGQ' UTC i fn ripiiAn of'At process. i app;iCSii01x two
gGfcr t° ude� awt 'oncxirrt of form to the gttictaud
�i&ure xfii- it oz, ih4$tibrdit Ll os .+t Qi}snc 12Gst eov'1 is a
oses s s t to aiicG n. ottllmf"Pianain G e T t?act I1C
pare 40 rid a ica n• to3 tY
t least Est submit tsa r(Sf r ,X:«�ictio nz -the raiea5
a} OPiicAn= ce tin theountY 3 and 5c psapCat on. poa 1 n8
fssistan Cit f Sht nat'�;e about ciao d in
able0 rr3f 0n
GGt
pia n des r n t f iO t ne spta der ° �et is t0r the
�u opc$cd Ptai
r comp aSvncna'lccs i. Aa'WhOt to t gxiov� "ri
local him8 tizsauf property v eats i
public itl istanct cbr 'pah}ir.
natiCCSit Ns5S
notices to Owner Affix ax ' u tl to iTV, Voee"x dour
ta
site. .i a£ected r-'' °aced ptoiG4`speox:3ed ha
,u SuhSeQumC*:i ri nndtscops 0* L�'zp tot rCvieW of a
tivkts
b) pur'th ',ature to�aGslutcs necesSs � a� agtol apl rnctGts
oA Grs the p pplid`tion« ; tt�!' w"The °m S fgxee ta�tGt
wash fscxlitY` recGw" nf, the nlitier. dtt on of the
tIon
days xsfxG,r, �ssessrA the etras an the prott as tot gisca:
WCi1 osltian
c} W so mcnkbal tncati Ole.Mine, too.s on t as comp
licc8otiatians m
ust titarsmest,i,si• fht cflmmu itj
rest
aop the en tnsa
Wxt ra at. fheansf ssittj bebe
nts and ptc matt l ut ,ubiisnd xrics.
ulic i'shto gli sl� QnsisLs of si'af Cri"�iroRa uSiriCSSks n is get
{ithe C0 )diitta' tseAtsstiW r s of atfac ,Nlsiclx
d
two tcpr nixtxvaeetin4r }fGalth au
£. IarBc• ttvo rtatse rt•epplic�txotir �rc by the ro.Alles an
groups•arsd tes in a p ncY t"fh cc..6 noo e t toI.I ad atkd
fhe zvfoli°a`nidcn t8°'� nknc,1ut �G}}. Ea cue, �1ao
g;9f• api�;icnts 0 �Gnerai vla as to
d} up ,With thde. tctiot►aunty and to eY ,Kith nbrniticd as i Wits
hour
gafetY cf fat't1tG loot eca�;cation :s r rocess• sR
nt 9n p tnxal sop a R,ctrxixs OnGt
Lhd i b>f ors $ fst sxtxSing t4. Coat►`
t
s.qB 9t tht Appro'�al
t, t Woad to a G rG` ittod to a fat rile Site the sptcifita
a sixail°t p aY bti cab ndtrt Dixcntlan} and sce VG hired
atyplit ativaa h vG jjse VermletriaY appiictaxari oavalu
tide
de a xn8
porraal it'c stops , i Esc iiC t r &
t Qadxtlona nitxg 18ent the np7 ors
G} tpnpp xn yigtt fgcilttY porm•ikin8
iicatio thti to notlfY
. � hazard E �'w$����application.and
v np;t+"tq� 5:13
Ku
h
r
=i
fu i
n
s;
I
"
Environmental Health Service: department,will have a significant role in
reviewing and commenting on a application.
The following-information outlines the local application review process
for evaluating a specified hazardous waste facility proposal. The
requirements added by state law are included in the information below.
Refer to Figur: 5-1 for an illustration of the items mentioned. The
Figure includes a description of the state process fqx informational
purposes since it may be a concurrent process.
a) At least 90 days prior to the submittal of a formal) application the
applicant must submit a Notice of Intent (NOT) fo the Office of
Permit Assistance (in the State Office of Planning aid Research)and
with the applicable city or County jurisdiction. Thc�NOI provides a
complete description of the nature and scope of thW project. Th.,
local agency notifies the public abot the proposed project by
publishing notices in a newspaper of'",general circulation, posting
notices in the location where the project is proposed',' and mailing
notices to owners of property contiguous with the proposed project
site.
b) Subsequent to the NOT the Office of Permit Assistance conv^nes a
public meeting in-the affected city or County to inform the public
on the nature and;scope of the proposed project. Z%o meeting also
considers the procedures necessary for review of a specified hazardous
waste facility application.
c) Within 90 days after receiving the NOT the local agency appoints a
seven member Local Assossment Committee. The Committee meets
with :the applicant to dettsmine the terms and conditions'for project
approval. The negotiations must .focus on the protection of the
public health ar J safety and the environment, as well as the fiscal
welfare through special benefits and'compensation. The composition j
-)f the Committee consists of three representatives of the community
at largo, two representatives or environmental o�- pudic interest
groups,and two representatives of affected businessts arv,d industries.
d) The applicant participates in a pre-application meeting which is set
up with the local government agency (as required by the HealtH and
Safety Code, Section 25199.7 ((e); Thss conference provides an
opportunity for the County and any applicable department to advise
the applicant on project consistency with the General flan one;
CHWMP before a formal application is submitted as well as to
respond to questions regarding the permit process. Most cities have
a similar procedure:,
c) Formal applications may be submitted to a city or the County once
these initial steps have been undertaken. Both the Site Approval
Ili Applizzlion (Conditional Use Permit Application) anu the specified
hazardous waste facility zoning overlay application nre required.
l State law requires the . permitting agency to dseide on the
completEness of the application and to notify the applicant regarding
Aft
ES-13
completeness within 30 days From the date the applications were
submitted.
f) Within 10 days from the (:ate the application wasdeemed complete,
and within-60 days from the notice of application completeness,the
Office of Permit Assistance holds a post-application meeting 'among
the'lead and responsible agencies,the applicant, the local Assessment
('ommittee, and the public. The purpose of the .:ieeting is to
determine the: issues of concern to the public and the,permitting
agencies. OAce these issues have been heard the applicant and the
Local Assessment Committee-meet regarding the terms and conditions
acceptable to the community, The Act includes a provision for the
Local Assessment Committee (LAC) to hir a consuttar-t to review
the project. The applicant would pay a fee established by the local
agency. In addition, if differences between the LAC and the
applicant cannot be resolved, the OPA may recommend the use of a
mediator. The applicant woad pa;r half thr.cost for mediation.
g) When the application has been found comalere by the p;>rmitting
agency, an initial study of the project will be made to idenl£y the
significant impacts on the Environment, if one or more significatt
impacts are identified then an Environmental Impact Report(EIR) is
prepared. if no significant impacts are found or it,the significant
impacts can be mitigated, a Negative Declaration will be prepared.
When preparing an EIR the lead, agency is required to send out a
notice to all zpplicable agencies regarding the preparation of the
E:lt. /. scopiag hearing can be performed by the lead agency to
obtain public input. After a Draft FIR has bews released the public
and responsible agencies have 45 days in which to comment on the
adequacy of the Draft. The)Draft is considered by .he Environmentni
Review.Committee in a public meeting, The environmental document
is ce;tiflad by the decision-makin body (in this case the Board of
Supervisors) when a decisiop is made on a project. Refer to P/A-5-
a foe the issues that will be evaluated as part of the environmental
analysis:
h) A noticed public hearing is than scheduled before the Planning
Commission for consideration of the site approval (€ond'Zional Use
Permit) and application of the zoning overlay, A staff rer:ort is
prepared by the Ind- agency which describes the project, any issues
of concerti, and p recommendation for approval or denial of the land
use applications. The Local Assessment Committee also prepares a
report thei, is submitted to both the Planning Commission and the
Beard of Supervisors or the City Council. It includes the Committee's
reconimcndaticus for approval or dsniat of the project and any terms
and conditions which have been negotiated. The Planning Commission
forwards its recommendations to the Board of Supervisors or City
Council A decision on the application is made by the Board of
Supervistors or City Council, at a noticed public hearing, Any
interestl,d person or the applicant may file an appesl on the approval
of the lbrojcct or the conditions of approval with the Stzte Appeal,.
10
Ea-14
u
U
O
x `lea94
E � � A3 eau E
p >
a 4c �
Q y � '� ,a � •U u�
m
c n
1
S Goa id3CYI 5S3OOldd 3.L'as
Board, within 30 days of that decision. A decision on the appeal will be
based on consistency with an adopted,approved CHWMP.
i) A Special Use Permit is issued as a 'condition of approval on the
Site Approval (Conditional Use Permit). The purpose of this permit
is to ensure that conditions of approval are carried.out.
j) If no appeals are filed on the land use applications, ministerial,
permit3 may be issued. These permits may include .permits from
building and safety,grading,environmental health, flood control, etc.
Siting.Criteria
State law requires the CHWMP to include siting criteria and designate
general .areas where the criteria might apply. Siting criteria set forth a
structure for evaluating proposals for specified hazardous waste facilities
and serve to focus the evaluation of facility proposals on-critical issues.
Siting criteria represent a uniform set _of standards applied to all
applications, yet they are designed with sotie flexibility depending on tl_e
type of facility and the proposed' site location, Siting criteria are used
for evaluating a project at a particular site. When used along with
general plan policies, the"siting criteria deterLdne the ,actability of a site
for a specified hazardous waste facility proposal. The use of the siting
criteria and General Plan policies are part of the full application Tr aew
an;' environmental analysis required of all applications. f(lr specified
ha rdous waste facilities under state laws The complete siting criteria
follow the policies/actions of this chapter.
GOALS AND POLICIIES/ACTf)NS
The l'ollowing goals, policies, and actions shall be implemented to ensure
that ;oecified hazardous waste facilities are reviewed according to the
procedures identified in state law.and sited in the most environmentally
preferred locations. Two terms are used to identify she implcmen;ing
'F agency. The term "this jurisdiction" refers to the applicable ciw or
county. Where County and "this jurisdiction" are used, the polifty applies
to both the County of San Bernardino and the applicable governmental
body.
Goals
G-5-1 To establish an effective and expeditious application review
process for siting specified hazardous waste facilities that
includes extensive public participation.
G-5-7 To appv a uniform set of criteria to the siting of specified
hazarde.—;.ante facilities in the County for the proteceion 4)f
the public health and safety and the envir6mment.
G-5-3 To ensure coordnatior among agencies and County departments
u the rcvie�ct all specified hazardous,waste f„citify applications
Within the County.
ES-16
,r
G-5-4 To protect vital grow:,;:Water rCsoMces for present and future
beneficial uses.
Policies and Actions
POIi ics/Actions this ur ctjga Requires of the Anolicaat
P/A-5-1 Because specified hazardous waste facilities shall only be sited
in areas where land uses have been deemed compatible with
such facilities,by the local jurisdiction: an ;a licant fir a
specified hazardous waste facility must apply for a Site Approval
{Conditional Use Permit)and a zoning amendment. The zoning
amendment applies the Specified' Raizrdous Waste Facility
overlay (as defined in P%A-5-4) to iic project site and buffer
area. The applicant shall meet all provisions of the specified
hazardous waste facility overiay district: (see Policy P/A-5-4)as
well as other general plan and;3dinance provisions.
P/A-5-2 Because the evaluation of it project application ie a.costiy and
time consuming effort and the public involvement demandc a
large expense,,
A) The applicant shall fund the public notification efforts including
public hebring notices to residents and property owners within
3000 feet of the proposed project boundary, legal and display
advertisements in .local newspapers and a paper of general
circulation, and a sign(24 sq. ft.) to be displayed,on or near Aft
project site(pursuant to the Government Code,Section 65090,.
13) The applicant shell fund activities rciatiag ice; the review and
evaluations of a specified hazardous waste facility, application,
including staff time, consultants hired to assist tl:`' Local
Assessment Committee with application review, review by any
applicable city,and',ire-application assessments.
(Government Code�acction 65941.5 and the B:iralth nd Safety
Cons,Section 251 7)
PoligiwA tie dieanireC a.'this apfisdicteon
PIA-5-3 ;amuse t'ao County recognises it's responsibility for siting
aeaded spt,afied hszestdous waste facilities proposed in
eavironmenta►ly sound locations, this .County will consider
applications for specificd hazardous waste facilities, Proposals (y
to site such facilities irb the County trust include applications
for a Sitc Approval(Conditional Use P:ratit)and for a specified
Hazzrzjus Waste:Facility overlay (sae PrA-5.4). A decision on
the applications wiil be based on staking the following findings:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the provisions of
thn General Plan, Development Code (zoning ordinant.c),
`tic CHWMP including the siting criteria, anq the public
ro.ources code(Section 21000,et.seq.).
b. The facility 'location ,and/or design adequately protect
public health,safety,aud the environment.
c. The p:oject is proposed in an area where present and
future surrounding uses are compatible with the specified
hazardou. ,-hate facility..
DIA-5-4 Because local Iand use plans and zoning ordinances are required
by state law to specifically address the permitting of-,ipecified
hazardous waste facilities and such plan3 and ordinances do not
address requireuents for these facilities,and because applicants
for specified haza'rdr)us waste facilities are required to apply
for a project-specific request to include the hazardous waste
facility overlay on the project site and buffer zone and existing
ordinances do not define or specify the requirements of such
an overlay, this jurisdiction shall amend the Development,Code
(or Zoning Ordinance) to require all rpecified hazardous waste
facilities to be permitted only with au approved Site Approval
(Conditional JTse Permit) in areas with a zoning overlay of
Specified Hazardous Waste Facility,
The overlay shall be applicrbU to all spe).-Med hazardous waste
` facility applications. The purpism of the overlay is to ensure
that facilities are sited in areas that protect public health,
safety, welfare, and the environment; to assign the specified
Hazardous Waste Facility overlay to the project site and buffer
so that incompatible uses cannot be permitted in the future; to
identify permitted uses of the overlay; and to outlir;. the
permit review procedures. The Development Code (or, %t 4Z9
ordinance; shall defina the Specified Hazardous Waste FacUityy
overlay as containing the following.
1. A requirement that specified hazardous waste facilities
may locate,is certain land use districts(or zone) with tin
approved Sits Approval (Conditia lal Use Permit) and
Specified Hazardous Waste Facility,)verlay. Land disposal
'acilities and incineration facilities shall locate in Resource
Conservation Districts (or zone) and other areas with a
population of less than 20 people per square mile with+fan
approved Specified Hazardous Waste Facility Overlay.
Treatment, incineration, recycling, storage, and transfer
facilities should locate in Regional Industrial districts(heavy
industrial zone or equivalznt) with an approved Specified 4'
Hazardous Waste Facility Overlay. Incineratifin facilities
shall not, however, be located in areas where emissions
from the facility could directly impact food crops-or
livestock:, (See discussion in Section 5.3.1 of this chapter.)
ES_18
2. The sitiag criteria presented in this chapter (starting on
page 5-2$� The criteria shall be adopted as development AIM
standards that shall be Diet along with other policies of
_the General Plan and provisions of the Dc�eloprir.s+ .'cde
(zoning ordinance'before a facility is approved. Corspliance 'r
with the sitia� criteria shall be evoluated as pa,11 of the
r:
environmental analysis.
I The application procedures set nut is AB 294.8 (Chapter
15(14,Statutes of 1946)for the reviews of,4,ecified hazardous
l waste facility apptic atiop!,
4. A r!,4ulroment that:aW-spec ried kw-ruous waste facility l
air,acat;ous are subject to a Special Y7st Permit. The
purpose of the Special Use Permit shall be to evaluate the
operation and monitoring plr.n of the"'Facility, to ensure
the facility ,ias adequate measures for monitoring on-going
impacts to girl quality, groundwater, and environmentally
sensitive resources, to evaluate the types and quantities of
wastes that wid be treated or disposed of at the facility,:
and to require periodic A*spections of the fi'.'ility to ensure
conditions at approval ara carried.out,
5. A requireiuent that all spccifled hai.-:dous watts facility -
applications include informs on about the Project''
proponents past business practice,.
6. 7 scretionary application review requirements to ensure
developers are aware of the different,studies that still be
required in the cnvireacmental analysis wten assessing tlsc
merit of facility applications. A'trepcitting and monitoring,
program shall be adopted to mitigate or avoid significant
environmental impacts as required by AS 3190 (Chapter
1232, Statutes of 1988). The different issues that,must be
studied consist of,but are?not limited to,the foil�:r.ag
a) An analysis of the projeces potential impact to
surface arnd.' groundwater resources as well as public
water supplies. The study shall idcintify monitoring
` and mitigation measures that ensure protPc_tion of
vital suri4ce and .groundwater resources for tfid-14lic
of the project.
b) An evaluatio,. uf'the gri,ject's impact to air qu»lity
and the consistency of the project with air quality j
<< regulations and the local air quality plans. The 1
evaluation must consider toxic air son+amina yts, wind
patterns, and an assessment of the Ilrolect% impisct to
PSD And non attainment areas.
r t c) An analysis of potential mineral deposits through a 1 4r site characterization study.
15-19
3) A review of tr, adequn.cy and capacity of the
proposed transportation routes including an
identification of highway accident rates. (Refer to
Chapter 10, PIA40.3, for other issues to addre_s in
the study.)
e) An assessment of risk on the population that evaluates
the physical and chemical characteristics of the
specific types of wastes which `will be handled, the
design .features of the facility, an evaluation of
potential air er issiuns f'row proposed facility, and
any need S"or buffers from residences,, immobile
populations,,and environment- iy Sensitive resources.
f) TV a facility propasss to handle acutely hazardous
waste, an analysis of the maximum credible accident
may be necessary puruant to AB 3777 (Ckm9ter 1260,
Statutes rr 19R,8): The study shali take into
consideration the quantity and types of wastes that
could be -eceived,at the fat'iility, the design features,
and the planned operational practices at the facility.
Based on the above items, the study sb 11 provide an
estimate of the distance over which any effects
would carry, options for reducing the risk, and
procedures for dealing vith the effects, includnf
recommendations for an appropriate buffer distance.
g) An evaluation of tilt projecVs impact to the
socioeconomic characteristics of the affected
jurisdiction and an assessment of the economic
via,biliryr of the project.
h) An axaluation of cultural, archaeological, and
paleontological resources on, the project site and
surrounding buffer.
P/A-5-5 Because several agencies (i.e. Ai: Quality agencies, Regional
Water Quality Control Board, Department of Health Services)
and local governments (County,cities and Special Districts) will
be involved in the permitting of specified hazardous waste
facilities, this jurisdiction shall request all applicable agencies
and local government departments to participate in a meeting
of a specified .hazardous waste facility application at i t pre-
application stage (as required by Health and Safety Cede,
Section 25199.7 (e)). The purpose of the meeting is to discuss
and documcat issues of concern to all appropriate agencies as
well as application review requirements and time frames. This
jurisdiction will usist the applicant in developing a matrix of all
reviewing agencies and agency requirements before a formal
application is accepted. R
ES-20
i
�! -Z 7
P/A-. 4 Because specified hazardous waste facilities haae a potential`riot
adverse impacts on the environment, sit applications shall
comply with the policies of the CHUMP and the siting criteria
and shall be the subject of environmental analysis. The
environmental analysis shall be done as a consolidated effort
amorog applicable County Departments. Compliance with the
siting criteria shall be evaluat;d in the environmental analysis.
P/A-5-7 Because th*s jurisdiGt -- needs to ecsure that wastewater is
appropriately disctsrgeo,tFis jurisdiction shall require specified
hazardous wast-, facilities generating treated wastewater to
discha>gc to the Santa Ana Interceptor (SARI line), to the
China Nonreclaimable Waste Line (Brine Line), or any Suture
industrial waste line or an appra ed new technology that treats
or elimipates the discharge. Wastewater shall meet all applicable
agency,p�Auirements for discharge to.thcr t waste lines.
P/A-5-8 Because a significant,portion of County land falls under federal
jurisdiction, the Bureau of Land VAnagement(BLM),U.S.Forest
C Service,and the Department of` Defense(DOD), and the polities
of DOD exclude the development of specified hazardous waste
facilities, and because Indian lands comprise another significant
component and Native American Tribal Councils have expressed
concern over the development of specified ha7-rdrius waste
facilities in the Countv, the County shall take the following
actions:
A. Complete a Memorandum of Understandi; }with the Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) regarding review of specified
hazardous waste applications for those projects ,proposed
on land owned by the BL14;
B. Notify and request$-kvolvement of Native American Tribal
Cotocila in the rev ew of all specified hazardous waste i
facility applications it their region,and
C. PreAlbit specified hazardous waste facilities on private
loads in tho Death Valley and Ioshut, Tree National
Monuments, Mitchell Caverns State Park, National Forest
Lands adm_nistetsd by the U.S. Forest Service, the 'Bast
Mojave National Se-1nic Area,, and any Wilderness Area
designated by the I.S. Department of Agrinulture, or
wilderness study area designated by " M as suitable for
Wilderness Area pursuant to the Fe at Land Manager. t
Policy Act of 1976. W.iea Cong, is acts on Vilderne:;s
Areas this policy shall be amender. to be consistent with,
those Wilderness Areas.
P/A-5-9 Because !date law authorizes a tax (not exceeding 10% of gross
receipts; approv"I specified hazardous Taste facility,and
these facilities have a potential to impact` fir environment,
public health, and public services, thi jurisdiction shall'? et
ES-21
aside a portion of the revenue for that encourage-
safe and responsible management of hazardous waste.
P/A-5-10 Because the Biting criteria and th* policies of this r1an sho0d
be applied uniformly throughout the County in, order to ensure
that effective management of hazardous waste and that facilities
-re sited only in env;roamental,y souati locations, the County
shall encourage all the cities within the County to adopt the
CHWMP and the siting criteria and development policies.-
P/A-5-11 Because specified hazardous waste facility proposals could
impact pro;osed city or County rcdtvelopmenc projects, this
juresdict"ton shall inform the applicablo.redevtilopment ageaicy of
all specified hazardou.waste facility applications,
P/A-5-12 Because the CHWMP sets forth comprehensive criteria for sit,'
teede3 specified hazardous waste facilities, the Citing criteria
shou,d be used to determine the su;tability of projects in all
County,city,state,and federal lands.
P/A-5-13 Because the Department of Defensu (DOD) cont"tbutes
significanVy.to hazardous waste oroduc}ion in the Cok,,sty as a
result of site remcdiation efforts,DOD operations,and businesses
producing products for DOD, this plan encourages the following:
A) That the DO!- implement waste reduction efforts to -tie
maximum extent possible.
B) That the DOD obtain appropriate permits from local
jurisdictions and allow periodic inspection of facilities for
compliance with environmental rr:ulatirns.
C) That the DOD consider undertaking' d exchange or least
agreements with industry desiring to, .e spacik of hazardous
was' `}cilities in DOD propoity.
D) That the DOD undertake hazardous waste management
efforts which are consistent with the goals and
policies/P:ctions of this Plan.
PIA-5.14 Ncause come kilns can use certain hazardous waste3 as a:
secondwc— and the use of such fuel significant&:+ reduces
large amoum.<,of waste and may result in improved air emissions,
This jurisdiction iball encourage facilities in San Bernardiao
County t(Ith cementt kilns to sae certain hazardous;wastes as
alternative: ,,sources of energy, only where improvements in air
a etnissiors q: n be achieved.
P/A•5-i 5 Because Section 65300 of the California Government Code place;
a dual mandate on how cities and counties in"t consider,
development within a srnert: if influence, the Cotfity shall;
ensure that all applications for specified hazardous waste
fak ;'tic are reviewed for consisttacy with the goals Ind
sr � ��_ !•
f
f
f
policies of the 1.89 County General Plan regarfing development
in a sphere of influence(LU-8 and LU-9).
P/A-5-16 Because TTU's have the potential to impact public health and
safety and the environment, this jurisdiction shall apply the
siting procedures to TTU's 5n a Base-by-care.basis. Case by
case determination shall be 'based,on the char$cteristics-of the
proposed projcct site,including its proximity to residential:and/or
immobile populations, lengtg of opera#ion in any given area,the
amount and type of hazard(fus waste to be treated:,the proposed
mthod of treatment,and the equipment and land area necessary
to oierate the TTU.
In order to exerapt a TTU from compliance with the siting
criteria and zoning overlay requirement of policy P/A-5-4, a
demonstration must be made that the TTU falls under an
existing land use permit for an existing business or facility, or,
the TTU is a minor, temporary use approvable by a ministerial
action. The determination of applicability shall be made by the
directors of the city or County Plannit1# Department and the
County Environmental Health Services department with input
from other applicable dEnpartments. If resolution of the
applicability of"the siting criteria or policy P/A-54 cannot be
reached, the decision shall be made by the city`or County,
Planning C-mmission at a noticed public hearing.
P/A-5-17 Because San Bernardino County obtains about 85% of s,*s
drinking water from groundwater and a -significant percenta!re
of the population of,Southern California also, depct<�:., ran;;arse
Bernardino County groundwater for its bentficial �No. ind
because inappropriately sited development (including sptotfled
hazardous waste facilities)have the potential to adverse ,3 impact
groundwater, this jurisdiction shall develop a Couu,y-wide
groundwater protection strategy. The strategy should consider
specific policies and. programs for regulation of potential-
snurces of pollution as`well as identify mechanisms to detect
and correct possible impacts to the groundwater.
ES-13
m _36
SITING CRITERIA FOR
SPECIFIED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES
(Refer to Policies P/A-54 AND P,,A-S-b)
PROTECT THE_3t.r9immTs a sAN I3ERIJARDiso CC?UIVTy
1. PROXR IITY TO RESIDENCES
a. A 2000 foot buffer zone from rosidencas shall be required for
any land disposal facility unless the owner demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the County or city and the State Department,,of
Health Services that a buffer zone of less than 2000 feet is
adequate for the protection of public health and safety. To
determine the appropriate buffer a frisk assessment shall be
required which considers the physical and chemical characteristics
of the specific type of wastes that will be handled, the design
features of the facility, and any need for buffering residential
areas tar other sensitivi areas from p-.%ential accidents or adverse
emissions from a proposed facility.
b. A risk assessment shall be required for any treatMent, recycling,
storage. and transfer facilities. The risk assessment should
AML consider the physical and chemical characteristics: of the
specific typo of wastes that will be handled, the design of the
facility, and any need for buffcring residential areas of other
sensitive areas from potential Fccideu¢s or adverse emissions
from a proposed facility.
2. PROXIMITY TO IMMOBILE POPUT.ATIONS
SDrcified hazardwaste facil t n shall ae sited so that no
significant risk is presented to the immobile populFtion. An adequate
buffer between the,hazardous waste facility and the immobile
population shall be establish id by a risk assessment. The risk
assessment shall consider the physical and chemical characteristics
of the specific types of wastes which will be handled and the design
features of the facility and proximity to immobile populations.
Immobile populations include schools, hospitals, convalescent homes,
prison facilities,facilities for the mentally ill,etc.,
3. PROXDIITY TO PUBLIC FACILITIES
cified hazardous waste facilities should be sited in such a manner
as they do not adversely impact the public hearth and safety of
large numbers of people in public areas or �ople in public facilities. j
An adequate buffer shall be detcini r ce by a risk assessment.
ES-24
I�I
4. PROVISION OF PUIILIC SERVICES _
)I ,
? ,Sorcified hazardous waste faeilafes shout, be located ir,areas where
emergence: response capabilities and public water and sewer services'
are available. When facilities are, locatecl in desert or rural areas
.:+here public services are not readily Svs"able, privately-owned
onsite water, sewer, and emergency. services i(self-sufficient services)
may be used. `
]ENSURE THE MU-MMAL STABILITY 01F i HE FACILFI Y
5. FLOOD PLAIN AREAS
a. Land disposal facilities may not be located in areas subject to
100-year events even with protection (CFR, Title 40, Section
264.18 (b) and•-CCR Title 22, see Section 66391 (a)(11)(b))•
Flood plain areas include areas subject to flooding by darn or
levee failure and natural causes such as river flooding,rainfail
or snowmelt,tsunamis,seiches and coastal flooding.
b. Treatment. rogyglins. st reac. and transfer facilities may be
located. in areas subject to 100-year flooding if. designed;
constructed, operated, and maintained to prevent failure dua to
' such events. Flood plain areas include areas subjrcc to flooding
by dom or levee failure and natural causes such as i r flooding,
rS.nfall or snowmelt:tsunamis seiches and coastal f, din
�p ._ 8
AMIL
6. PROXINUTY TO ACTIVE OR RECENTLY AC'x"iVE,FAULT'S
No soecified hazardous waste facility should be place-within 200 feet
of an active or recently active fault.(California Code of Regulations,
(CCR),Title 22,Sectlop,,66391;(a)(11) to (1)and (2).
7. UNSTABLE SOILS
a. Land disposal facilities shall not be located in,areas of potential
rapid geologic change(Tale 23,Subchapter 15,;Section 2531 (e)
of the CCR).
b. Treatment.-recycling. stn£a$e. and transfer facilities may be
located in areas of potential rapid geologic change if designed,
constructed, maintained, and operated to prevent failure a} a
result of such c:angea (Title 23, Subchapter 15. Section 2531
(e)of the CCR).
ES-25
-t
( PROTECT GRd3iJ QUALI
8. DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER
a. Id dI,isoose: fa-i iti g mall be located where natural geologic
features provide a natural barrier that prevents contamination
of vital groundwa�er resources by waste,;-and leachate (Title 23,
Subchapter 15, Section 2531 (a) of,the'CCR) and which meet
the siting requirements of the Sts:e Water Resources Control
Board.
b. Treatment, r�vcl�anQ ,�Jge. �cj transfer facilities shall �e
located where natural geologic features prevent the contamination
of gro?3ndwater unless the engirccring design and construction
of the facility_and, containment structures are capable of
preventing significant adverse.impacts to groundwater,
9. MAJOR RECHARGE AREAS FOR AQUIFERS
a. Land d sogsal facilities sh�ul_d be prohibited within any area
known or suspected to bd!supplying principal recharge to a
regional aquirer as dcfinet I in state, regional, or general plans.
The County General Plan-and Bulletin 0118, 1975, of the;
California Department of Water Resources identify the following;
as regional aquifers;
Ames Vp.icy(7-16)
Antelope`Valley(6.44)
Bear Valley(9-9)
Bessemer Valley(7.1 5)
Big Meadows Valley(8-7)
Caves Canyon VEllcy(6-38)
Copper Mountain Valley(7.11)
Dale Valley(7-0)
Deadman Valley (7-13
El h'lirage Valicy(6-43)
Harper Valley(6.47)
s3etendale Fauot Valley('1 48)
Iron Ridge Area(7-50)
Johnson'Valley(7-18)
Kane Wash Area(6-89)
Lavic Valley(7-14)
Lost Horse Valley(7-51)
Lower Mojave River Valley (6-40)
Lucer�,e Valley(7-19)
Means Valley(7-17)
Middle Mojave River Vailey (6.41)
Morongo Valley (7-20)
Needles valley(7-44)
Pipes Canyon Fault Valley(7-49)
Seven Oaks Valley (8-8)
Troy Valley(6-39)
ES-26 a
s
Tweutynine Palm Vallcy t7-10)
Upper Mojave River Valley(6-42)
Warren Valley(7.12)
!Upper Santa Ana Valley(8.2)
b. Tr stm nt recycling: storage. and transfer facilities may be
located ih principal recharge areas if facilities are designed,
constructed, maintained, and operated to prevent accidental
releases.
10. 'PERhEeABILITY OF SURFICIA7"MATERIk LS
a. Land disnosal fadlit= shall be located in areas where underlying
geology provides%40crmcabiiity meeting the regr-remants ut
the SWRCB {pursuant to Title 23, Subchapter. 15, Section 2531
(b)(1)of the California Code of Regulations),
b. Treatment re and transfer facilitie9 `may 'be
sited in areas where soils are permeable if adequate engineered
feitures such as spill containment, monitoring, and inspection
measures are included in the project design and construction.
i
PROTECT AIR QUALITY
11. NON-ATTAINMENT AIR AREAS
2aLg10rd ham waste facilities may be located in non-attainment
I
areas if the facilities meet the plans and regulations of the air
quality agency of each district,
12. CRITERIA POLLUTANTS IN PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT
DETERIORATION(PSD)AREAS
Soec'ft ied hu rdoys wasta facilities may be located in PSD areas if
facilities meet the plans attd regulations of the air quality agency of
each district: These facilities, however, y
ma act located near or
within national parks, wilderness and memorial-areas, and other
similarly dedicated areas,as specified in the Clean Air Act.
PRO TECT EI`'b;RO NTAL•LY SENSITIVE AREAS
13. WETLANDS
Specified hazaLdous waste facilities shall be prohibited from impairing
the viability of wetlands such as saltwater, fresh water, and brackish
marshes,swamps,and bogs inundated by surface or groun!5water with
a frequency to support, under normal circumstances, prevalence of
vegetative or aquatic life which requires saturated soil conditions for
growth wad reproduction, as defined in general, regional, state, and
ES-27
r
�3
federal plans 'A protective buffer zone shall to established based
on a biological resource study and zisk assessment.
14. HABITATS OF THREATENED.FLARE,OR ENDANGERED SPECIES
Specified hazardous a+_alitfacilities shall be prohibited frora impairing:
the viability of habitats of threatened, rare, or endangered spgoies
as defined in general,regional,state,and federal plans. A pratacfive
buffer zone shall be established based oa a biological resource study
Al
and risk assessment. f;
15, PRIME AGRICULTURAL LANDS
Specified har-rJous waste,facilities may not be sited on prime
agricultural lands as defiried in California law and adopted local land
use plans unless an overriding public need is Served. When siting
hazardous waste management facilities in these areas, overriding
public service needs must be demonstrated.
16, RECREATIONAL CULTURAL,OR AESTHETIC RESOURCES
avecified hazardous waste facilities shall not be located in
recreational, cultural, or aesthetic resource areas.except log:. volume
transfer and storage facilities which are necessary to handle hazardous
waste generated by visitors, workers,or residents iit these areas.
Recreational, cultural, and aesthetic resource areas include- public
and/or V-'Wate lands having local,,"Yegional, state, or national
significance, value or importance s46 as; national, statt, regional
county and local parks and recreation areas; historic resources; wild
and scenic rivers; scenic highways; ecological preserves; public and
' private preservatirn areas; and other�l,lands of laral, regional, state,
or national significance.
17. AREAS OF POTENTIAL.MINERAL DEPOS!TS
Specified hazardous waste ragilities should not be located so as to
preclude extraction of minerals necessary to sustain the economy of
the State.
LAND USE RESTRLaTON
18. MILITARY LP,NDS i
Public specified hazardous waste facilities shall not bo sited on
military lands pursuant to DOD policy.
i
ES-28
ENS OF HAZAFI?dfJS WASTE
19. PROXINUTY TO AREAS OF WASTE GENERATION
a. Lnrd disposal facilities may be located more distant from waste
generation sources than other facilities because of their
requirement for larger land and buffer areas.
b. TreatmeIt, r_ecvclina atora..d. jnd transfer facilities shall be
close to hazardous waste generation sources to minimize the
risks of transportation,,
20. PROXIMITY TO MAJOR TRANSPOR.7uATICIN ROUTES
,clo cified hazardous waste facilities Shall have good access to and
from major,transportation routes(state or interstate Giv,ided highwaysj.
21. MINSIME TRANSPORT THROUGH MINOR ROUTES
eiri$d ham ous waste facilities ;should be sited so that road
networks leading to major transportation routes do not pass through
residential neighborhoods,should minimize residential frontages,and
should be demonstrated to be safe with regard to road design and
construction,accident rates,eXcassive traffic,etc.
22. LOGATIONAL RESTRICTIN5 DUE TO TRANSPORTATY-614
ROUTES
a, Sp cified hazardous,waste facilities shall not be located Hhere
highways 58, 62,,and 91 are used as major transportation routes-
unless a study of transportation routes as specified in:P/A-10-3,
identifies mitigation measures which can be implemented to
make the particular route suitable for its use as a maja.,'route. `
b, row volum transfer and storm—fay ti s may be located in
these areas if necessary to manage the hazardous wastes from
that area. -
' ,.vl
i
i
ES-29
CHAPTER 6
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING
AND STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
State and federal governments have established programs which require
businesses thal handle hazardous substances to prepare an inventory of
the hazardous substances stored and to provide that list to a local agency
designated to administer the program, Thf� purpose of these disclosure
laves is to have information available, to first responders in the event of
an emergency at the site and to provide information to local residents
regarding the king';and amounts or chemicals stored in their communities,
The legislation did not include standards for above ground storage of
hazardous substances as part of its mandate,
Assembly Bill 2185 (Chapter 1167 Statutes of 1986) mandates that all
businesses handling hazardous substances provide to the local administering
agency an inventory and location of hazardous substances stored on the
property. This law applies to all businesses which bandit at any one time
more than 500 pounds,_55 gallons, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) of a
hazardous material, The Department of Environmental Health Services
(DENS) has been designated the administering agency for purposes of the
AB 2185 program for the County of 'San Bernardino, including the
incorporated cities (California Health and Safety Code, Division 20,
Chapt:r 6.95).
This chapter supports existing efforts in the underground tank program
and recommends a continued effort in the maintenance of underground
tank records and an annual report on this program. Above ground
storage requirements are recommended for inclusion in County implementing
ordinances.
GOALS AND POLICI--S/ACTIONS
Goals
G-6-i To reduce the risks posed by the storage of hazardous substances
in above ground tanks and containers.
G-6-2 To minimize the threat of contamination of groundwater from
leaking underground storage tanks containing hazardous materials.
G-6-3 To minimize the threat to residential areas from the use of
hazardous materials.
Policies/Actions
P/A-6-1 Because some waste reduction technologies significantly reduce
or eliminate the amount of hazardous waste generated since
i, they are a part of the manufacturing process, and because the
equipment for these technologies can malfunction causing the
ES-30
. -s F
potential for a hazardous substance release, the County shall
amend Uniform Enviconrrrntal Code to reiluire all hazardous
waste generators and hazardous material handlers to report any
such equipment malfunction or upset which may cause haz:rdous
waste to be generated.
F/A-6-2 Because above ground storage of hazardous materials may pose
a threat to public health and safety and the environment and
County ordinances do not include standards for above ground
storage, an% because all hazardous material handlers may not be easily identified,the County shall do the following;
A. Revise Division 3 of the Uniform'Environmental Health
Code to establish above ground storage standards for
hazardous materials. The ordinance shall include, but not
- be limited to,eke following requirements;
secondary containment of substances;
- segrcgaltion of incompatible materials,
- storage, of hazardous substances restricted to an area %k i.h
a surface impervious to the substance;
methods to prevent run-off of rain water and/or collection
of rain water if area iS not covered;
fencing and/or other security of the, area with adequate
C signs present to inform of the presence of hazardous
materials;
emergoncy equipment to be stored onsitc as appropriate
(eg,proper absorbent to deal with a spill or an appropriate
neutralizing agent);and
minimum storage distances from adjacent land uses.
E. Establish a system:for identifying all handlers of hazardclds
substances with such measures as,
review of telephone directories and other business listings;
- exchange of ire,€orma0on with city code enforcement
officers, local fire agencies, and city business license
offices;and
field surveys as necessary.
C. Review periodically each place of business registered in
the hazardous material handler program to verify the
hazardous substance inventory on file and to Advise the
handler of safe,Storage practices.
P/A-6-3 Because leaking underground storage wnks threaten groundwater
resources,the County shall do the following;
A. Amend the underground storage tank ordinance to maintain
its consistency with state and federal reiluirements.
ES-3l
B. Continue to enforce the Uniform Erg tonmental Health
Code by such measures as plan review ,and inspection of
-co w tank installations, inspection oe'existing tanks at -
f,east once every .threc years, and inspectit? at all tank
removals.
14aiotain'-.ccords of tank performance by reviewing on-
going monitoring programs to evaluate whether current
requircmOnts provide adequate protection, or whether
areas with high groundwater (at 30 feet or less) require
more stringent protection.
D. Develop a Memoranda h of Understanding(MOU)with each
of the three Regional Water Quality Control Boards which
identifies tho respective duties of the Water Board and
the DEHS regarding oversight of mitigation effprts
E. Prepar, .:n annuat report detailing the number of tanks
under permit with the County,the nature of their contents,
monitoring programs in use, the ,number of facilities
inspected5, and a fisting of sites where an unauthorized
release has o.ecurred and its clean-up status.
P/A-6-4 Because certain home occupations 'use and ,store hazardous
materials and the use and storage of hazardous materials in
residential areas may pose a threat to the public, this
iut�sdiction shall continue to prohibit businesses under a Home
Occupation Permit to store bazarduus materials for commercial
use in residential areas. Violations of this policy shall be
subject to enforcement action by, the local jurisdiction and/or
f ire authority,
in addition,the County shaV�coordinate with cities in developing
a list of home occupations that use hazardous materials or
generate hazardous waste within city jurisdictions. The list
shall be distributed to city and county planning departments.
ES•32
i
CHAPTER
REGULATORY PROGRAM FOR.GENERATORS
(including Transportersii;td new TSD Facilities)
The federal law governing hazardous wast+. management, the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)* t7�iginally exempted hazardous
waste generators producing less than 1000 kg (2200 Ibs) per month of
hazardous waste from compliance'with that taw. The 1994 amendments to
RCRA, (the Hazardous and Solid Waste,.Amendments of 1994, HSWA),
lowered the exemption threshold so than businesses producing more that
100 kg(7201bs)per month of hazardous waste are now subject to RCRA.
California has taken a different a')proach. California has never had any
threshold value for determining compliance with the hazardous waste
managetnrnt requirements.. Anv ZZusiness which produces a hazardous
waste must manage that waste :a accordance with state requirements
regardless of the amount produced. Although many of the California laws
have been in effect since the seventies, local enforcement of these laws
began in 1983 with the MOU agreement.
In September of 1983, the DENS entered into a Memorandutt of
Understanding (MOU)wide the California Department of Health Services.
Through this MOU, DENS agreed to monitor all businesses who generate
or produce hazardous waste within the County to unsure that they comply
with all state laws and regulations pertaining_ to the generation and
management of hazardous waste.
Approximately 21(!0 businesses have been identified as generators of
hazardous waste; these businesses are under permit with the DENS.
Extensive, efforts (such as "door to door" sweeps, compiling lists of
businesses likely to generate hazardous waste based on Standard
Identification Classification Codes)were undertaken by-DEHS to identify - {
generators. ')espite these efforts, the DEHS esti#astes that there may be
as many as 560 more hazardous waste generators doing business within the
County which the DENS has yet to 0entify,
Additional treasures are necessary to identify all generators. The business
license and renewal form is recommended in this p1sn because of its:
success in many counties and cities whel—I used as a screening tool foa
determining whether businesses handle 1.1zardous waste. Educational
assistance, assistance with disposal of waste, and consideration of the
needs of the limited quantity generator(;produce less than 5 gallons or 50
pounds of hazardous waste) must all be addressed in ptder to ensure
generators comply with regulatory programs
ES=33 MO
i
1
I
I
GOALS AND P L ACTIONS
O ICIES
Goals
j
i
G-7-1 To ensure that all businesses.h. the County that use hazardous
materials and generate hazardous waste properly manage these
substances,
I
G•7-2 To provide hazardous waste generators with the necessary tools
to comply with existing regulations by continuing 'generator
education and technie-nlassistance efforts.
G-7=3 To determine the need for and feasibility of providing disposal
assistance to small quantity generators.
Policies/Actions
P/A=-I Be`.ause hazardous waste generators need a permit from DEHS
and such a permit requirement enst es on-going compliance
with regulations,and because not all fiAzardous waste generators
have been identified in this County, this jurisdiction shall
continue its.efforts to identify hazardous waste generators by
using field surveys and 'instituting cooperative efforts with fire
agencies to exchange information.
P/A-7-2 Because a consistent method of identifying businesses that use
and generate hazardous substances must be in place, this
jurisdiction shall use a business license (or similar requirement)
and its annual renewal to determine whether businesses handle
hazardous substances. This policy shall be implemented by the
following actions:
A. Development of an agrAement with all incorporated cities
within the County to ensure that questions regarding the
use of hazardous materials aad the generation of hazardous
waste are included ":i both the city's business license
application form ,mod its business license renewal form.
The information `;6ined from these questions shall be
shared with the E EHS.
B. Initiation of a business license or similar requirement for
the unincorporated portions of the County to be used for
information retrieval purposes. Questions shall request
information or, the use of hazardous materials and the
generation of hazardous waste.
P/A-7-3 Because many hazardous waste generators are not aware of
local,state,and federal requirements,and providing information
about these requirements could ensure complizpce with.
regulations, the DEHS hazardous waste compl.njuc ;program
shall continue to include a strong, emphasis on eL.:icational
assistance to hazardous waste generators. Every of fort shall be
ES-34
�.
s:
made to make these programs accessible to all areas of the
County. The following actions shall be taken t- achieve this
policy:
A, DEH5 shall continue to pr�,lish a quarterly newsletter
providing the latest information on new laws and regulations
affecting hazardous waste generators.
B. DBMS shall continue to publish and ,update the San
Bernardino County Hazs,-; us Waste Generator's Handbook
which inriudcs information on applicable regulations,
contacts at 61h6r regulatory ag.-acies,,and -resources such
as the waste exchange, recyclers and haulers available to _J
generators,
C. DEHS shalt continue to sponsor works5ops on regulatory
compliance with an added effort to schedule conferences
in the desert portion of the County.
PIA-7-4 Because hazardous waste generators have expressed an interest
in having assistance with disposal of hazardous waste, this.
jurisdiction thall perform a detailed needs assessment and j
feasibility study for a transfer station and/or+County coordination
of hazardous waste pickup in all areas of the County.
i
Thn study shaii includo consideration of the types of wastes
needing management, opportunities for source reduction,
recycling and treatment, and the likelihood of private enterprise j
meeting this reed. if an unmet need is found, this jurisdiction
shall determine the feasibility of providing that unmet need. 1
i
ES-33
j
i
9
CHAIP'TER
LA.NAUSE REQLtIREMENIS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE
GENERATORS AND HAZAWDOUS MATERIALS HANDLERS
Public concern exists regarding the potential threat to areas surrounding
businesses whiciz use hazardous maiterials and generate hazardous wastes,
particularly with regard t9 the disttance of such businesses to residential
and immobile populations as well as major drinking water aquifers. While
land use oil zoning regulations provide a mechanism for siting industrial and
commercial development, the use of hazardous substances by existing
businesses may not be;:onsidered when changes to land use or zoning are
adopted or residential development is approved. Consequently,residential
areas may be sited near these businesses for vice versa). To address this
concern, information on the amount and type of hazardous materials and-
wastes used by new or modified businesses should be part of the
discretionary review process. Devel;opment standards for the review of
new or modified busiaesses should also be established.
A two stage approach is necessary for the proper .siting of businesses
that use hazardous materials and lleaerete hazardous waste. The first
consists of requiring preliminary information regarding hazardous materials
and waste management practices at the time of application submission.
The second requires that this preliminary information be documented as
specified in state law through a completed business plan,waste minimization
plan, and, if applicablcx a Risk Management Prevention Program. These
plans would be completed prior to final approval of the land use application.
All businesses, are subject to the requirement for these plans whether or
not they are filing for A land use application.
GOALS AND POLICIES,IACTIONS
The followi►g goals sand policies/actions require the adoption of regulations
for the consideration of new or modified businesses using hazardous
materials and gcilerating hazardous waste.
Goats
i
G-a-A To ensure that businesses locating within the County incorporate
available risk management and waste minimization'practices into
their operations.
G-8-2 To minimize the risk of exposure to hazardous substances by j
the residential,and immobile populations.
Policies/Actions
i
PIA-8-1 Because information regarding the amounts and types of
hazardous materials used and hazardous waste generated are 7
important factors to consider when siting new development or
reviewing existing businesses,this jurisdiction shall:
ES-36
` J
f,.
1) Amend the Developmen Code(zoning ordinance) to:
a) require nc%' businc,..s to submit detailed information
i "regarding the s rounts and types of hazardous materials
used and hazardous wastes generated, the business
procedures implemented to manage these hazardous
substances,,and the emergency procedures employed in the
i event of an accident. The appiicam must demonstrate
that the business operations are consistent with hazardous
material/waste legislation.
b) require new or modified businesses to complete a
business plan, waste minimization plan, and,.if applicable,
a Risk Management and Prevention Program prior to final
approval of a land use permit for a new bzzlness or
j modification of an existing business. The`requirements
specified in AB 3777 (Chapter 1260, Statrltts of 1986) and
AB 3205 (Chapter 15, Statutes of 1988) regarding the
applicability of the RMPP shall be identified in the
amendment. The plans shall be submitted to the Cou aty
DEHS for review and approval.
2) agenc,e;,city and County building and safety de planning
E reach efforts to ci-t and Coil
- y departments,
and the real estate industry regarding newplanning and
reporting requirez ,cs as well as the identification of the
types of businesses which may be affected by these
requirem..ats. Such a program should include the
development of brochures and flyers describing the
requiremens and an identification of types of businesses
which are likely to handle acutely hazardous materials.
Ili
P/A-8 Because certain quantities of ccutely hazardous materials could
1 pose a threat to the public health anal Safety and the F
environment, this jurisdiction shell amend the De-Oopment
Code (zoning ordinance) to require a conditional use permit for
all businesses or governmental facilities handlipS acutely"
i hazardous materials in excess of 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200
cubic feet.
P/A-8-3 Because inappropriately sited industrial facilities pose a threat
to the public, and because zoning ordinances do not identify
quantity or use limitations for hazardous mater;al/waste, and
4' identifying restrictions could address future concerns with the
siting of industrial facilities handlinf`hazardous material/waste,
l this jurisdiction shall evaluate the feasibility of establishing
siting criteria that identify the types and amounts of materials
allowed within particular zoiting designations. Tht study shall
i identify a list of chemicals and appropriate thresi,olds which
would cause a business to be subject to specific, land use
restrictions, recommend changes in the Dovelepment Code
F t r' and identify
� (zoning or.,tnance) far review of sue. Industries, y
ES-37 -
a
M ,4y
�„�r
the advantages and disadvantages of implementing such an
ordinance.,
ES-38
h �
nn J
CHAPTER 9
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
Househald products can be classified into five general groups; household
cleaners,automotive products,home maintenance and improvement products,
lawn and garden producto, and miseellancous items like batteries or pool
chemicals, These products are common household items, They are often
discarded improperly because most individuals do not recognize their
potential danger. Improper disposal of household hazardous waste (IIHW)
may lead to injury to refuse collectors and equipment damage, and wren
disposed to land, MW may cc^ %minate soil nr groundwater. Disposal to
landfills, storm dralas, sanitary Sewer systems,and the ground,as well as
evaporation aad storage of these products, can load to human health and
environmental concerns.
In 1984 the �."ounty of San Bernardino; established a cots prehensive
program for addressing -he 14HW problem. The program began as a pilot
project under a grant from the Calife:nia Waste Resources Control Board.
The study dealt with the feasibility of separating HKW from the municipal
waste stream and disposing of it properly. The County opened two
permanent collection centbrs in February, 1985 as pail of the grant
project, one at the. County Agricultural :Commissioner's office in San
Bernardino and the other at the Central Valley Fire 'Station in Fontana.
Based on the su:,ess of the pilot program, the iaoard of Supervisors
approved County funding to continue the program and subsequently
approved funding to expand the program..
The County HHW management program includes;
o Five permanent year-round collection centers.
o One-day collection programs called "Round-Ups" in areas of the
County not served by tho existing collection centers.
o One-day puldlicity and collection "events" to publicize and
encourage the use of txiating centers.
o An on-going public education and information effort to=ncrease
public awareness of HHW issues and also provide educational
materials to schools and interested groups.
W.th the location of only five permanent collection centers County
wi0e,there are vast areas of the County which are not being fully served
by this program. The increased poputtrity of these events has increased
the number of users to a point 'where storage size of the San Bernardino
site may not be adequate. New permanent collection centers may be
added io the prc$ram since the Round-Up events are very labor intensive,
The Round'-Up events require trained personnel to accept, sort, and
package large amount., of waste for processing (recycling, treatment, or
disposal) in a fixed amount of time. Alternative treasures to expand the AMML
ES-35
1
I
program should also be considered, however. The program should be
erpanded to include collection centers at landfills,enforcement efforts at
landfills to discourage improper disposal, and continued public education '
efforts. Participation by the County Solid 'Haste Management Department
is recommended.
COALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS ,
Goals
G-9-1 To ensure the effective management and disposal of household
hazardous waste County-Aide.
G-9-2 To prohibit unauthorized disposal of household hazardous waste'
in facilities that handle wades.'
G-9-3 To inform the public 'about the need for proper dispcsal of
household hazardous waste and to inform the public of the
availability of the collection centers.
Policies/Actions
P/A-9.1 Because recent studies at municipal landfills show evidence of
contamination from hazardous vastes, thin jurisdiction shali
establish a strong enforcement program to prevent disposal of
household hazardous waste in municipal refuse facilities.
P/A-9-2 Because household hazardous waste is disposed at local landfills
and because a strong enforcement program will detect significant
-amounts of household hazardous waste, this jurisdiction shall
develop household hazardous waste diversion programs at all
facilities where waste is handled, to properly manage these
wastes. Whenever passible, collection centers should be
established at appropriate facilities -ith public access.
P/A-9-3 Because the capacity at collection centers can not rm,ommodate
the needs of the entire County and tf;ie diversion program will
add to the amount of hazardous 'wastes requiring special
management, this jurisdiction shall address the County's needs in effectively managing household hazardous waste by establishing
a larger transfer and processing facility.
P/A-94 Because public education efforts have alerted the public about
proper methods for disposal of household hazardous waste as
well as the availability of household collection centers, and i
because there is a need to continua these efforts for County-
wide public awareness, this jurisdiction shall continue its
comprehensive public education prograin.
ES-40
f
��y7 '
CHAPTER to r
TRANSPOR-.NTI0-
Hazardous waste is transported by truck out of the County to treatment,
recycling, and dispoial facilities, and into the County from other areas
for treatment. In 1996, San Bernardino County exported about 41,OOC tons
of hazardous waste; hazardous waste imported into the County comprised
about 9,000 tons. While no current estimates exist for %yansport of ,t
hazardous materials, national estimates suggest that trans,,drtation of
hazardous waste is relatively insignificant compared to the amount of
hazardous materials transported: These hazardous materials 'become
hazardous waste when 'pilled in the environment.
Federal and state agencies are responsible for the development and
enforcement of the transportation regulations throughout the state.
Federal and State legislation require tiro proper identification of transportel
materials, set minimum standards for cargo containers, and require that
hazardous waste be tracked from generation to ultimate disposal. The use
of the uniform manifest/shipping papers,':4lacatding of transportation,
vehicles, vehicle safety inspections and the use of a uniform format for
reporting incidents which involve a hazardous material release, have
resulted from these regulations.
Although ,federal and state agencies are responsible for the development
and enforcer,;ent of transportation regulations, the local jurisdiction can
Save a role in the transportation of hazardous material/waste in the
County. The local jurisdiction may designate routes, restrict hour: of
transportation, institute notification requirements for certain Categories of
waste, and provide educational and training opportunities in the
transportation of hazardous material/waste. In addition, the local
jurisdiction may implEment -road mitigation measures, such as repair of
roadways, to reduce the risk of transporting hazardous materials/wastes.
Federal law preempts any.state or local requirement which is inconsistent
with the requirements of the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act
(HMT'A). A state or local tcgq,, rcment may not be preempted if the DOT
(or the courts) determines that the state or local requirement provides an
equal or greater level of protection to the public than the federal
requirement. Federal law specifies, however, that the state nr local
requirement cannot unreasonably burden commerce,
GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS
The following goals and policies/actions addrass the need to ensure safe
transportation of hazardous waste through the County,
Goals
G-10-1 To ensure the safe transportation of hazardcus materials and
waste inland through San Bernardino County.
E -41
1
9
Policies/Actions
P/A-10-1 Because st7fe transpdrtat on of hazardous waste is an important
goal of e,tlsting' state law and local jurisdictions, specified
hazardous waste facilities shall use routes that can safely
a".Zommodate additional truck traffic, do not pass through
r,,: idential areas, and use interstate or state divided highways
fa major routes.
P/A-10 Because local jurisdictions can have a role in the safe
transportation of hazardous waste, this jurisdiction shall ,
;establish a task force whose purpose is to develop'proposals
for specifying routes for hazardous waste transport, identifying
limitations for scheduling times of day and days of the, week,
types of wastes that can be transported, and the need for
notification requirements. Also, the task force shall further
assess the routes of concern (Highways 58, 62, 71, and 1-13).
The task force should be composed of members of the public,
City, County, and regional transportation planners, emergency
response personnel,and industry with expertise in transportation
of hazardous substances.
P/A-10.3 Because specified hazardous waste facilities must have access to
e transportation routes, this jurisdtaion shall roquirc
alicants for specified hazardous waste facilities to fund an
analysis of transportation concerns (sce policy-action P/A-5
4(6)(d) Chapter 5), The transportation study shall provide a
description and analysis ofthe projected volumes of hazardous
waste transported into and through the -County. The
transportation task force identified in policy/action P/A-10-2
shall participate with local government staff in developing the
scope of the study. The study shall include, but not be limited
to:
An identification of all reasonably available highway and
railway routes in the Southern California region and the
development and comparison of the risk associated with
the alternate routes;
* A comparison of the risk associated with tvansporting
hazardous waste in different truck and rail cargo tanks;
An identification of rouic• pecific, risk-reducing measures
for each route examined;and
r ° An. identification and evaluation of procedural (i.e.,
training, routing, curfews), technological (i.e., equipment
`! innovation), and external risk-reducing measures (,e., road
improvements, emergency response improvements) to
' transport hazardous waste by truck and by rail.
P/A-10-4 Because planning for safe transportation of hazardous waste is
a regional concern, this jurisdiction shall work with regional
F ES-42
� w
transportation planners in ensuring that local issues are
addressed in regional tran;porta•%on plans.
P/A-10-5 Because state highways are used to transpovt hazardous wastes
through the County and it is necessary to maintain highways in
good ccndW-on, this jurisdiction shall participate with regional,
state, and federal governments in determining priorities for
funding,and repair of highways in the County.
PjA-10-6 Because transport of hazardous waste on local roads has not
been considered,, this jurisdiction shall study and develop
transportation and routing; plans for the tratrsport of hazardous
wastes within urban areas.
PJA-10-7 Because knowledge about safe transportation of hazardous waste
as well as state and; fedcral transportation, regulations is
important for 'proper ;5anagement of hazardous waste, this
jurisdiction shall continua';its education program for hazardous
waste generators The wram'shall include information on
proper labeling,placarding;and manifesting requirements.
PJA- O-$ Because transportation of hazardous materials is on important
issue that nacds further consideration. and because current
plans do not address the transportation of hazardous,materials
and these materials are transported through the County on a
regular basis, this jurisdiction =shall require the task force;
identified in Policy consider transportation of
hazardous materials issues as well as those of hazardous waste.
ES-43 `
u SQ
CHAPTER I I
ENFORCEMENT AND Ew=, RG77�tCY RESPONSE
Enforcement and emergency response are two critical elements necessary
for the effective management of hazardous waste and materials. The
County's enforcement program ensures compliance with hazardous
material/waste regulations by conducting both investigation and, possibly,
litigation of potential violations. The emergency response program, on
the other hand, consists of an emergency response team composed of
active trained personnel and a model emergency response plan(Area Plan)
that identifies the resources and responsible agencies in the event of an
emergency.These programs are critical because they ensure compliance with
hazardous materialjwaste regulations and the local jurisdiction's
preparedness in the evert of an accidental spill or release. Also,important
to proper management of hazardous material/waste are inspection and
monitoring efforts. These issues are discussed in Chapters 6 and 7.
GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS
Goals
G-11-1 To ensure .he safe,',management of hazardous substances within
San Bernardino County,
G-11-2 To continue providing a comprehensive, response to emergency
situations in order to protect public health and safety and the
environment.
11.4.2 Policies/Actions
PIA-1 1-1 Because consistent, periodic inspections of hazardous waste
generators in the County ensures compliance with hazardous
material/waste regulations,the County shall continue to conduct
a hazardous waste generator and hazardous material handler
inspection program. `The program shall emphasize education and
technical assistance to hazardous material handlers and hazardous
waste generators rcgarding regulatory requirements and waste
mir,imization. Every effort shall be made to implement :this
program in all areas of the County.-
PJA-11-2 Because inspection and enforcemcnt efforts are conducted by
several different agencies and a combined enforcement program
may ensure continued compliance by businesses i.;the County,
the County shall continue to coordinate enforcement efforts
with the State Department of Health Services, the Regional
Water Quality Control Boards, the Air Quality Management
Districts, and other federal,state,and local agencies.
P/A-11-3 Because enforcement efforts provide Ti mechanism for ensuring
compliance with hazardous material/waste regulations, the
ES•44
County shall continue to fund the enforcement program through
permit fees.
P/A-11-4 Because emergency response• procedures involve woral di fcrent
oatucies, the County shall develop an on•going awareness,
program that informs the police, fire, and other,agencies about
the pr"td*ts and responsibilities specifiei3 in. the Hazardous
?&terials.ResSonse Rrea�Flan.
P/A:I1.5-Because the County has significant expertise in Coordinating
responses to emergencies, the County shall continue to be the
coordinuting agency'for the Interagency Response Team.
i
P/A-11-6 Because response to an emergency rettuirca trained, experienced
personnel, the Interagency Response Team shell continue its
advanced responsa cgpab lity training.
ES-43
CHAPTER 12
SITE MITIGAtION AND LONG TERM REMEDIAL ACTION
The prevalence of hazardous materials and products has been widespread
throughout the County and citiesr as these[products are commonly used in
our society. The consumer demand for these materials requires that
businesses `handling hazardous materials and generating hazardous waste.
be located in every jurisdiction $ucit materials and wastes have been
produced aelid handled for many years, and accidental releases of these
materials have created a multitude of contaminated sites. The most
common thr&n associated with these sites is the potential movement of
hazardous contaminants through the`land-to water supplies, particularly
groundwater aquifers. Other problems associated with contaminated sites
include: toxic cl fissions, improper land use in areas on or surrounding
contaminated sites,and short or lung term risk to public health and safety,
Several federal, stgte, and local programs have been developed to identify,
characterize, 11 ad'iltimately mitigate;.4ataminatior. and potential negative
impacts at tht:te sites. These programs hsye resulted in several lists
which identify sites targeted by each program, These lists often duplicate
each other, although considerable differences occur among the lists.
While data are being compiled on these sites, they are incomplete because
there are difficulties in tracing boundaries of operation,finding responsible
parties, and fully assessing the extent of the potential contamination.
The available data are maintained by many separate agencies,1.'zd risk
determinations and mitigation methodologies are not yet completed for
most of these sites. In addition, these lists may change as sites are
discovered, created,or mitigated.
The objectives of some of these p,,pgrama and their resultant site lists aec
to ensure that jurl9dictions are'u,ware of these sites, that timely and
complete cleanup occurs, and that proper impact review is conducted as a
part of the development/land use review process. When data on hazardous
waste generation projected from cleanup efforts are made available by the
responsible agency, it will be included in the data analysis section in
future revisions of this Plan. However,most sites have not yet been
evaluated by the responsible agency,
GOALS AND POLICIES/AG?IONS
The following goals and policies/actions address the need to coordinate
activities related to site mitigation and long term remedial action.
Goals
G-12-1 To ensure that all jurisdictions-.re aware of all identified
contaminated sites within Seen Bernardiao County,
G-12-2 To ensure that timely and complete cleanup occurs at
contaminated sites.
ES-4fi
G-12.3 To ensure that environmental review is conducted for projects
proposed on sites which have been ic.ntified a5 contaminated.
Policies/Abtiont
P/A-12-1 Becatmc current ;information on the location and status of
cleanup of contaminated sites is of vital importance for
development in the County,and because the office of Planning
and Research (OPR) List is not frequently updated nor does it
provide details at to the contamination or status of cleanup,
this jurisdiction ift°ll develop a contaminated sites data base that
provides y,eographi;,a], physical,and land use eharacteri;jtics for
use by applicant;,, and industry. In addition, the);County
Department of Environmental Health Services (D3?iiS) shall
update the OPR lief,tin a periodic basis and, pro Fide a DENS
updated list to each jurisdiction. The DENS updaied list shall
also be used by this jurisdiction to assist in identifying
contaminates; sites associated with lend use applications.
During DEHS preparation of an updated list, the following may
ba .'nctuded:
a) informatiop on site contamination and its applicability to
different types of development 'to assist cities and
appllcats,
b) information regarding the current cleanup status of
contaminated sites,and
c) addition of sites to the OPR list,
When DENS proposes to add a site to the OPR list, DEa.S shall
first notify the owner in writing. Analytical evidence shall be,
required before a site is listed'. The owner shall have 15 da!s
from the date of this notice to make a written request for a
Administrative Hearing regarding the proposed listing. When
requested, a. hearing shall be. held prior to listing a site as
contaminated.
P/A-12-1 Because cleanup of Ontaminated sites is a complex task which
involves multiple agencies, DEHS .shall monitor and
cooperatively with all agencies involved in site assessment and
remediation. DENS shall consider developing a Plemoaandum of
Understanding with state and regional agencies to provide
assistance and oversight of monitoring, assessment `end/or
remediation activities.
P/A-12-3 Because the method of remediation can cause impacts, the
County and cities in conjunction with the State Department of
Health Services shall encourage onsite treatment and remediation
to reduce the transport of hazardous waste from contaminated
sites, and should insure appropriate remediations are completed
to provide permanent remedies:
ES-47
1
P/A-1.2.4 Because site remediation activities require coordination and
expertise, DENS shall implement a site assessment and
remediation program and develop a program to enhance training
of personnel in site assessment and mitigation techniques, and
risk assessment'techniq%v,
P/A-13-5 Because site assessment and remrdiatiaa creates costs to the
local agencies,the Cqunty should investigate funding possibilities
for cleanup Retivities. This should Consider how local agencies
can recover full or partial payment from responsible,parties for
cleanup of contaminated sites, reduce the duplication ce effort
among all agencies, and minimize the cost of work. The
County and cities should support legislation that defines the
responsible party in re(,nrd to the assessment and cleanup of
contaminated sites, as well as legislation that improves access
to state and federal Superfunds to clesnup orphan sites, DEHS
should seek state funding for underground storage tank
remediation programs
P/A-12-6 Because state law does not specify Iocal actions or procedures
for projects proposed at a location listed by the Office of
Planning and Research (OPR) as a contaminated site, and
impacts may result to the public health and safety, and because
development on contaminated sites may preclude future
environmental remediation this jurisdiction shall amend the
Development Code to implement the following as a part of the
Aenh development review and permit issuance process:
a) require a preapplication meeting for all da-w1opment/land
use)applications at locations listed by OPR or ZZHS.
b) require all developmeut/land use appli::_tions Ft locations
'listed by OPR or DENS to be subject to discretionary
conditional use review of this jurisdiction, except wren
l deemed not necessary by this jurisdiction. Exemption
fsort discretionary review shall be based on the scope of
the project and the nature of the contamination.
P/A-12-7 -)ecause this jurisdiction has a concern with proper cleanup and
f funding for cleanup of contaminated sites,this jurisdiction shall
! do the following;
i
a) Recommend, by resolution, to federal legislative
representatives that legislation be developed to inquire
Department of Defense to include site cleanup :and to set.
aside money for cleanup (at present cost) as part of base
closure plans,and
b) Require that a clean-up plan which includes the sas.rce of
funding be submitted to DEHS for review and approval
before new or alternative land uses are undertaken.
y ES-48
�a"1
CHAPTER 13
PUBLIC EDUCATION AND PAR :CIPATION
An effective public participation program depends on early and continued
planning to generate input from a broad cross section of the population
and the regulated community, The overall public participation program
for the CHWMP aliov,.d for public input on concerns and priorities;
suggestions for alternatives and new strategies;and review and assessment
of proposed measures. An effort was trade to inform and encourage
participation from the general public, civic, environmental and business
organisations, the cities and agencies within:the County,and the regulated
community. Also, the services of a public participation coordinator were
secuted to assist department stiff in implementing a public involvement
program. An extra effort was made to get input by early Novemb& to
meet the December 31, 1987, Draft Plan deadline. Preparation or the
final CHWMP required,additional public involvement efforts. The CHWMP
public participation program consisted of the following elements-,
on-going advisory committee input
- distribution of"zzwsletters
- distribution of as infortnative bxachure
- L series of public workshops
- a speakers bureau and slide presentation
media coverage
distribution of 3000 copies of the draft plan summary and about
750 copies of the Draft CHWN,P
- a series of pubic hearings on Me Draft CHWMP
Successful implementation of the CH1'BMP will depend on continuing public
education on We tr,;,*rtance of pvoper hazardous waste management.
Continued efforts in this Area will need to focus on public involvement in
the implementation of the programs specified in the CHWMP and on
public participation in the review of proposals for specified hazardous
waste facilities.
GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS
Public participation should take place throughout the implementation of
the CHVft"programs as well as when applications for specified hazardous
waste fac:Iitiea are received. The following goals and policies/aetit ns
ensure continued efforts in involving the public.
GeaIs
0-13-1 To continue public participation and public education in the
implementation of the programs identified in the County
Hazardous Waste Management Plan.
G-13-2 To include public involvement in the review of applicatiets for
specified hazardous waste facilities.
Afth
ES-49
� ,w �
Policies/Actions
PlA-13-1 Be.:ause public participation and education is important for the
preparation and review of the CHWMP, the County shall
establish an on-going Hazardous Waste lv sT----r nt Advisory
Committee to review reports on implementt._-- ur the plan,to
consider new program directions, to guide a continued public
education program, and to assist in revising and updating tl;e
Hazardous Was3c Management Plan.
P/A-13-2 Because Biate lawn requires the formation of a Local Assessment
Committee (LAC) within 90 days-after receiving an N01, this
jurisdiction shall establish by ordinance policies and procedures
for the formation of thc.Committee, the selection of vtinbers,
and the role of the LM3 in regard to other decisiow-making
bodies.
CHAPTER 14
IWLEMENTATTON OF CH%'NW PROGRAM
The CHWMP recommends several.programs whieh 4ddress the County's
goals regarding effective hazardous waste management. In order to
r*hieve these goals, reasonable efforts must be- made to implement
CHWW. ,programs. Implementation' depends on the establishment of
program prioeiYies, the iftntification of funding sources, and the
development of a schedule for implementation.
The programs recommended iu this Plan were separated into three
categories for implementation: immediate, first year, and second year
imrftmentatioll. The categories represent both the priority for
implementation and tha proposed implementation schedule The programs
placed in the immediate category reflect those progra= that provide the
needed foundation for future County programs, :they are the highest
priori y programs. Programs placed in the Ella and: sccond year
implementation category are also important but can>b:delayed because of
concerns with funding or because isst;as related io'these programs have
been addressed by pro g rams identifFJ in the immediate category,. The
priorities may change, hbwever,' based on the availability of funding,
changes in local attitudes,.and the recognition of new conditions.' Some
` programs like .he'ordinance amendments may be implemented all v once
if staff and funding sources exist;
The attached table summarizes the information regarding>implementation
of the recommended programs. The implementation schedule, responsible
agencies, 'resource' needs,. and potential sunding sources have all been
identified. The majority of, the p«grams will be'funded by permit fees.
Some of the programs arc -ne-time (i.e., ordinance amendments) efforts
that can be absorbed Wo on-going County projects, others like the
transportation studies require the identification of funding sources.' The
tablr. p-;eseats the County's best estimete of potential funding sources.
ARM
i
i
I
` II
ES-51
++, to r
71. dLOtl�k R q
U PI OHl g U G O 'NO N a e
43
3�ctn nu�+5e OSr o �:a
E.0 s�+�aisga a ?:+die tl&
4.00 fig mR'O a C.to s3 m N`01
CHo.D NCC 60 N:C 14 e! L�.Rxf a OOf
W.O SSt1.WV Sxa DIW VtH 0 W.
_. a19U
34 0 C
�qt 4- $ g a a
idJ lot S A. .Or.O. 4S, M.CS 14 a U.N
y1 p�M�.ta Ytli. O H awl M Tf GaJ
Qpg4to 0
cc Awt03 wwQd y way
m SZ Fi:O OOL q..A �0
W 7 i5f ti ii.U YS a VSOwq H.- N.H C Ti
D
N
N V1
a �•r•a••'' s W W
of c c
x
H
a
u S° 14
W O W. o l.1
y B MAJ
°ma3tl rov+� vtld.0
c
zm xIc cvc ea euc
tl 4,
p gag a
� ma 0) 00�
rza ci
oat w s a M �w► K fAa
a 10 o d m
o dOd .� •� saga a a �g 9tsc
H' Jtl+aY°i�yH C �Oy r �mCta VC N�d wOcUu•C CJ
NC + a i
e - OMwC nm«im NM "pd
iT1 a a43v.4
a
q. q V N +4 w .4
q a+tl.+ ++ d W tl
Y i3 R ll e a N ts m tS
a-a
a d%4a 4 YC,M Q@10 9tl Amy NAV O _
A ii0 vet yaq >4 'drf. +iaJ�o H C G .04 k U.a-41
A to R ♦7 R fA d 13 A d G e O tl y. •,•l
O MN O.Y WONNd .rt O d.4 't9:IDC
? Ait.aN . 04,C34A - 9al tl 643 1301um
V3 'tlA tlNtliJM Y N41 }I a, a CO
K 6S N a5 d 4'O d �xft rf 41 T4 N d tl?U
kl fn+9 R ! 4 A tl N x Y A +J 9.'LS J�G
UG o NIT N.I A 10 N112 _u tl tl N 1! %CNN
M 1441 W tl ro M N" �C is 4)P. m =r4 U -N M 14"-4
1 A 41 N O ! Y t o tJ t1'C
P0i� ...gib rtMA of MMMd N�3.4Y a' �Y. .�{A>1 .max �Ci.Nq�
•.f N
"C d M-0
m ..I O N 42
-
M lop O. C d.v. O G'O li.GOi +4.
- G ii ,11 O�•1 PI N al 'G.
O
A 44/N d A C •1i CM44 1/
!� H 7M 4ANtTU dL. O
tq N N.O L L R d C 9!1 1 C at
C'. M D+.i.14 0 a 0 A.
GS K, tDM AM LdC U0 AOii 0t0
Fpa iiNU aiduaiQC ro d
i OauA�t tiSI�pWRMRQSi uw
�A. oa G3+
Ll
M0 n ao yMir 41
- tid C Ld r04W4 C
v$
H ae e
a°fro o0 o.wu
ma40 la u m1C�1 4'it0'aw
N ii a?r m �Aj
ecttm ac b u D&D
to�W +i 'O. :4 C A a
iX W W 04 U. Ta 0
a �
Nji
N t3
Tu.M N
0-4
0 4 o a o 4 0
n a �aa
C m b a a a o o?i v
�au
W. Mvv �cla
a u®� toi 99 d u COi c,
NU. CdS�M iSMH- CGHM
C N
AJ
O
V 6 LDi 6�iW d NV yy
" pp
N to d CM' U «Oi iJ OQ OL ro
+ ai d U. O S U O - 11 11 N. ai
E M a1 V.li N :. D 01 al 6 C .
a wo's° » eQ%
Ll AM Caj q'O
LS At 6L L 7�%4U d Ano
AH
g 34 UM1+ A A.4 jNd
t 9G O.. IIO"O CAj 100.N Y. K O0t.q
M.C .•1 O II?1 P • to N A 0. U d3 8 11
64 O4 iL A2 CO.O.NU
E' of NV 4 4yv tul q. .Oik�C CC• a'u
C.0 0 d CI 0 7 W ••i 01 &O 0%
t KX NU dN:OI .. >VF *0NdA
¢., terryry N A .. M N t4 0 M LL 4 .n W-a4 U.d - -
a lil. N la C N D.C O Ot 4 O w 0
�;° ii 1�VJ CO'! R
q
WU fJ..W Oto pN
b �
e s �
YM c tq .ctl
Qra7.N
a Y O Aa+.
M�
r°I asN vl9 C'07.1 MOON
000 ti t4, W N,RRga
4G•M ti to I IsC a a
w wo
a C A2 m p�na�,lY
%4492a cM aq�.
a: 4, a30 ..aON de MQMN
OW 'O.0.' 0 Y•id M11 INOY.WWO OG MN0M YI!'y4 Mt N4.'tlh
>Y94 .1> 0
JrC 0 W009W Wq3 Q'03 N
U O
�1
Sf1
4 c oto W
9 y'
O U M 6 O.N _
CW yGLMI y6LL}iMJ N
CPC
" GOU OYCMI O
O M O M O
M
Y41mm a 4
aSIq
Yu 00.w01 Ra mMA �Y:M
He xw►y aR►.. IyWN
a
N m M
A pkaQi a. ray 2.4 a O
to 0
Gd Y�qj. M, a.c F.
id N U ey d r1 1�N a A4
L q 01R�4i:'.+� A N 441°Lb
-�a . caY w aacy
c 'Ac a tl al O 1
Oa®:"CN MarMRyCO
4 oN �0 c diq .7 Y
UNFN e W.6
s .0 0NGf.Yu°CcI L+:4Iaqt wsaaNae/
.Y 0 1tig3iy
�(
.0c —O G
•
—
0 q
Q� ." r'I..H+1 N H.1 v 4 M Y to.'�
o IOU d
oar m m w
z iJ q•.C1' w y.x )n k
w
Ic
ft tru tru CC
o w m .�' Em
to
r. w am
�( MAL
d■. q to rl O D Ai G s"S N N O
aO AMq .•1..Mq O.q miG
w
a rj al i0 ewe ®°�
it q�•im O •C .00M mFI m%4q
N C 13 y. A ul d Or V W'o 4 u
jj
7No u°G0 %,%*A YtY Oyy?°a.
�(� N •0°Wa°! w�•.�1 N G u aofj
O C Al G1.4 q'O>U dl @.O g D O O q!!
Oi 9O. L Y7O.14 Nq ,J i.l-4yq
W ♦•1 y 1, 'A it it O LI L y m it N la
oc VaSl dWa qa fA ITa •�•�++WNMdM
N W vd'O. Qy�CO� WCHG - 2t°7 •�O Oul f°t
%to O'O A.7 «7.O ij N O:W`•1 in 14 O.6.R.qi
a v'i
Mm c ca s w
p�w
W V d O N
Wt 2 NM y �y+
O W
i
.HC abl q �gpkq wU9 uNa
CaL 4 G O C C Y G C m G
N W o m.4 O a.•/ o 14.-4 04,4
,4
a- u epp, uses uw uWtu
WN fY..�N QG wM lY4M {Y.WM
G to
u G a
4j M
a
m $4 ii m 11
a^� .4 4j Im
9 IT•.�1 H lmd al N 43 m�.Ma om m
Q ►mi.Gi !i C q yy gy 'ai.�•i
Ql m W O a °G I.o l G O a!$N q • C Q
4 O $4 M >.M "14,.1 M M O f0
O a,m ue9 N u,O tT MS
I w Y .N w y O +1 t7t C.1 11 9• O N
•i11 m q ym. q 14 .y C. O41NN N MJ.1
M OA m Mtiy �1' taCq^J W Om
Y
q.q C197C i,Yt •
11 r/ A1.1 y q C d nlw >t
� m M M d O d>'0.d. q •.1 aJ
■.q S a q. O M N.•l+.q � d.C.1r O q
tl••� M C O.r1 O M q O O C 11 M y
M'n 9 q N m L N U a A.R7.a A G m
M O o r1 o !O c A W O 4 ti'rJ N Ul-4
A 0'O. O dG 7 w.0 O 0O100 "1
SJ t7 Y tl N M 1./ i�X M ? .4
'O O t7' C 14 G n•1 C ki q 47 q q q r1 m U +d A.•1
W f11 CG• C N g q q d M d M L
CIO ES dG O XW N4N w L•uN
>I N mm YlaO0 N aw � Z
MG4. Wyy nV 4Yu ^I OO�GA N W%+�+
ap3f;� I Ot N A O. i l a •.1 1 O 1 N
G.R� O x 7 N!',y.. ♦+m V,J id C. P. 3�4i G
+�a q A ^
r! .�J2 4 q N N tp 'i't1.M •r. �D.'O M rd 4 3
t
m
a
wwu
m
m
u ar toi
tT y jy,, ns ypa 24,
>T3 q
qha�u
ou x A1A C:C,S�m O.OROaOY W:
'mOCAO.MNW Z'Lig�Nq m.ak mu Z y
NA yC`hOW CmRSt. CO t'404
a+ s+N�t a�C R @ M X ra(a$4 fi yy q
.°d+ waau q+A+1ao �,°mm c+°aoao,°cvo ca
N Q .1 C N M C.� qq m o 4�-1 Car as k!to LT.of
V H 1!m 6 a C 0 g m ri 3t y fa O ai o Q A'p q..i
a�1 au 3r-1aw a ao m >3 °:ea�+a a ,tea
on mm> 4 reDyS3?uO .rCL7wo .r aw
tWo w w sOi toi vi a K tbi.aCi. 6 w tgi O yroy m sai l 0xx p
PG 0 Q C6=0 4 A 6[W I 41 a 0 A 4 q Ce N•C lti.10 a W Y
o00
y�
..rkaj tnOR W
pLC4 q .
D.QRP A
t39 0tla.04 oM m L17
or G b�N .04
1i c p.
as w w0 w w "! 4 w C
5+ s! fad k y .p N
cue go my =
w.: aam a m a a>I m
>am e 'a
u a a3a, ona uua:a,
►'+ttal :�f+N W..V!M tog Vl.'M Ago li
A m u -
titlz
to
.-t
0 LAi�v O.tl. M OM Y 9 C A'
O ii i! t�9C O GL 6A1 SOt p
Sk C - Aat wttC a a wAmu O�3
-1 4 7 1.L Q Ott a a 0 w ti G W
c! +1p Igoda ., ,H H
a A 0 V Q o m u oC r�e!awa aCc at
H A Ot
gyeru p oa aa+ �n tihaK
4 C tta ♦JCO CY A a0 COUaC
+t'.B C H M Oa • v 4. CT H A fa.l+l a O
A N 14
O 1t >+N a C fa Ra W H V
O ��{t LT. O C 1140
M k r.z ~p U GOAT .wit..4 9 Yh. R H gat Oat
�a 0 tA.S 01 Y bat 'O ra' "'f 0 CT+H C
N m a D«a
{iO ..� N.CA N4A N41,46 v M iOtw ��a oft I,Iu W IS r
ao n+t W t u A A(tl L I'm q
+i 4 0 6 4 N Q !'�a a M;C QM � ]�
? N C u 41 i
$K. .4 Q w 0 L%.4
M
A•N 0 k.M tyl. A.m AAOL
C7 N U fi 4.)p1 A C.- N
G. a 4 !1 a a+a y. aM y
Z N_'.1 A4gFiarototy is++ N
w imi�m HitNS1°s'-,a►mi 1miA S
qH, e o yqm
Hm rLaaao�.' 9E 0...°i"4,12 1 s°aa c
a W 94 n a q A e+aro4tawHmO�. m..roc aca
HD mm mro roNgamtri mm oral Ntl
pO O.rtl C ym Ow>0 tl ^t tl.i Qm.
i4.tw wOMM y14W.�+O %4 m U
e
c o eo
w w+ca .ui a>i u -10
�e oLe.0 wko roe oaoa,
M 0 O vat.V H 'F'>, Oa'.a.
aa.r u mR!wro .,ro o
ma wa .ecQ a tleu
%.g1 ad a 7 ro U Q 9. G>7,.q u
w ma 4cawmy lnaa rota
�, o roy mQ�+>u eo oa of
¢ G >U aM•A.� l 4;
OO roV m roCw. it a Le O..C4
ro? to ALw a1 a0 to C k
tO.W RQ wSMUq M6 '1 mq
W W m.N O O.W m Y' X U tl W 0t m
6 .�.N H3OOt 410 WN3a O a
Ta N
.4
M O! y
to W u �.
pZp N
CG 0 C p raLl
p
O w O W O M O 40t O
m w q u w q �o q. m
H -a-(I u •IJ 4 y ro O Y 'a E1 i
T., cm C Cm C C.'+C CJ.I C.
W yym?+m (■m�7.1 apmf U Ly yO((M V
go a.i ra p 4.1
N O 4 N p Q she O m:.•/
Ws U4.9t UwLL ODpUa U14a
MN ttrkA (eM}aM C6N1y
e
■ ft
M C e
O eQO1 O w Oq a .Y aW 40.a.i�.O y S n C L+Ci .��. A O
tp C 443 n q y A m a.® n U 4
•'yy!AaO� JQCJ LYN.b..wq qa O@ MC+1.J1 G.:Qa yA. to
C... C3,y.. .ape ti
ulhl
N O 0.0
iN'.% C a
tY Oro C O roM U 7 Q O
4
9NN1OU e aU.y A 1tl%a M
Q rtIANwae CO w
0.nro
QLw0. do Ai ym
a aquu>t nM ao mo A o a a ou"
y. o a O L�1 A. a A o M ..� 3 w,-i c oar w m-q
W.N U6. •�qtm C.n Ororo UA -,V a
HZ mro aN Of.1 • m ro$ .1Q a n/+iN a a O.5
19 > Q a N y w H. >M A a`A a IT
IvaH vN1. as .H mro1+ 8ro wA zaUK r� tlaa 1 l
aF nu aoaro a 1 �rarn Hm 1 s wtl tl t o o; a+ 7
s+ocwtJ na. so a roe uwy nto wC.1 tiG tlw of .i.1 OQ•.I .�.®
"'A r1 k Otr1 w�M •+• r1 y P. N k •r.O .d 0.r+N rC .ti 40 O U
� m
0 jJM V
m
..riaai m rom
O.+Oi 03!iJ K b.y y.
'CJ iF_4 kMM pal.
Cq. NUNaU . 41
O m M..al .C, G LOi'
on A'riV1A aay-43 y.�+
cc.a�w w0cwCZ00 xa
iL G 3
it
co
ji
00
gn
v�
No M u.
oo W
G Z to tf
tNW�W �'
aC p p
9 M. O w p
F 440
ji 'GAY
IM°pa ��' a
1t tJ
u 940
x44GIy
is
C p 4 N k E1
.rt it
93 °�, +
m c+=+ u u� tJ m Omu,Ct
an+u .mi Vi a. a a 0 lw it 41
M m 0 if 44 1r
�M MR r CJ r1tl 7 kmC oRO2O
lR M O ! W fJ 1! '..q
00.Q O O C O M m CT fA r•1•N
^ °O 6/ A aCG� 1 Z 9aC N
Cr Yt O N. a old Ls,
'O M Ci a
4f u 0-4 U Y T7 y + ;p Y.Ga O C O m Cuo
tw•t z O tC m y. m d..eat er A a s p.. i, t 1 ai
00 k c,k 0 lai n N 7 A. N C U g Cw
A t�,� a h•�at 4 U.O.O M W O.SS W Gg S A
z
Q►7N1.2
CITY OF RA14CHO CUCA.MONGA CUCn yo
STAFF REPORT
r
[z.
Date: May io, 1969 19i'
To: Member of the Planning Commission
From: Joe Schultz, Community services Manager
By: Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator
Subject: Conceptual Pl an' for r Three--�4cre Park Located�n
Alta Cucata Drive South of baseline Road: in the
Red Hill Area
ABSTRACT:
A conceptual plan has been , developed for a general plan
neighborhood park in the Red Hill area. The Park and
Recreation Commission is recommending approval of the conce,ot
to city Council. The Planning Commission is. requested i-o
review the design ana forward any comments regarcing the plan
on with the. Park and Recreation Commission recommendations to
the City Council.
BACKGROUND:
City Council in 1984 approved a conceptual plan for a
neighborhood park in the Red Hill area called Creekside Park.
The plan was developed in conjunction with the Army Corp.." of
Engineers as part of landscaping and recreation impr_nvewent
along the Cucamonga/Demens flood control channels. Community
objection to the design surfaced when authorization was
requested to develop working drawings for construction of the
park..
To overcome the community objection, city Council, or. the
recommendation of the Park aitd Recreation Commission.,
appointed a ten-member Community Design Committee. The
committee througl; A series o;r meetings, developed the concept
as shown with Exh4bit "A".
I The committee fell, to meet the needs of the Red Hill
::ommunity, two elements of the designs were important. First,
.?.a landscaping should beautify and make a statement about
Red, Hill. Second, the design should express the historical
signi icance Of the artist,
ITETQ N
a
Conceptual Plan for Red hill
May 3, 19S9
Page Two
To incorporate those elements. the -design includes a lzrge
center section devoted to turf open space. Surrounding the
turf is extensive landscaping with flowering shrubs and
trees. The committee expressed a strong desire to see color
introduced into the landscaping for visual appeal and to
attract birdp and wildlife.
South of the open space will be a historical monumentation
viewing area. Utilizing the meadow effect created by the
open space and the mountains north of Rancho Cucamonga as a
back drop, the viewing area has i�.k grape arbor covering wood
benches. Located in front of the benches will be a flower
planter surrounding a granite boulder on which an historical
plaque will be mounted. The plaque is suggested �.1 be
inscribed with the wording recommended by the Historical
Preservation Commission and modified ?'�y the Park acid
Recreation Commission as shown with Exhibit CBn,
Other elements of the design include a loop trail system with
an exercise station; connection lof the park with the three-
mile Cucamonga/Demers Trail system by a bridge across the
flood channel; a children°s play area; group and individual
picnic facilities; off street parking for eight vehicles; and
a restroom building.
Finally, the committee suggested the park name be changed to
Don Tapir Park in honor of T_vurcio Tapia and his ievalopment
of the Cucamonga land grant. The Historical Preservation
Commission felt the title Don would be confused, with Donald
and suggested the name be Tiburcio Tapia Park. The park and
Recreation Commission felt the park should be named Alta
Vista for the relationship of the two streets adjacent to the
park Alta Cuesta and 7alle Vista. Final resolve of a name
will be with City Council.
RECOMMENDATION•
The Planning Commission review the Conceptual Plan for a
neighborhood park in the Red Hill area and forward any
comments on to City Council.
r �f�
-�•�,
� ' � a
,� � ,
�� ' �
.�,�
� �" ;-
�r� �(�� � �+�
y
�fi;.,„'� �I' � ,�fit.
1�_��... tt�,+11� �t l�s+c' fix",(-f;^{�„ �
,�^ t
` ` � �1� la
; ,{:
� ,��
�. .� *��
��'
=nor;, d:. �;
���
,..,,••
r��� �
.t� t�'F R'� '---
;r. !��
-�� � �
,�• 4 i
&.��.}.
��.
C'
f
f
EXHIBIT 0