The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989/05/24 - Agenda Packet ` u 0 5 8,9� PC" �' � CA r ' CITY OF. a RANCHO< CLr-AP XMA g , ENDS, 1977 WEDNESDAY MAY 24,1939 7:00 p.m. LION PARES COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CIUMORINIA L Pledge of Allegiance IL Rolliill Commissioner BL,1Cesley Commissioner Emerick Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel '- Commissioner Tolstoy IIL Announcements N. Approval.of alinutes Adjourned Meeting of March 10,19eS Adjourned Meeting of nTay it i May 10,1989 V. Consent Calendar The folloicing Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-contro,rersial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. if anyone has concern over any item, it should be mmoved for discussion. A. TIME ZXTENSION FOR CONDITIOWZ USE PERMIT 8 r 20 -- INLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP A requ,:t to allow a church within an existing pre-school "For Kids OnIyO facility on 1.18 acres of land in the Low Density 'Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre),located on the south side of Ease Line,east of Hermosa -APN: 1077-061-09. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-21 AND PARCEL MAP 9998 - MASI The deve'ppment of a blaster Plan for a 27.13 acre industrial park and the first phase c9 construction, consisting of ,a 58,000 square 'foot mini-storage facility with a caretaker's residence on 2.95 acres of land in-the Indtlstriaf P19* District (Subarea 7), located at the squthweat corner of Footh;'d Boulevard and Rochester Avenue- APN: 229- i 011 10,19,21,.24,'17,'and 28. C. DESIGN REVIEW FOR -TENTATIVE TRACT 12586,- CENTURY AMERICAT� The design review of building elevations and di Wled site flan for 75 single family lots in a previously approved tentative trac'f map consisting of 1$4 single family lots on 28.7 acres of land in the Law Density Residential District(2-4 dwelling units per acre),1,90ated on the south side of 24th Street,north or Lower Loop appli atlon is I*e Associated with this eliemoval Permit 89-27. D, 'ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR IIEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-01 - BARTON DEVELOPMENT r,.The dd Velo!sment.�f 3 indusb tat E:dI inge totaling 22,772 squi;rs feetl�!r J,y i3 adm9i of �^ L•�r4 in the General Industrial District(Subarea 8)of the Industrial Area SpeciVe Dian, located at the southeast corner ,of Utica Avenue and P44n Court-APN: 2W 34.2-51. VL Public Rearms JJ T'ho folloWng items are public hearings int which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project.., Please wait to be recognized by,the Chairman anti address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per ir,.dtvidval for each project. r E E. ENVIRONME�NTAL ASSESSMENT AND '`'DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT'AMENDMENT'83 02 BLACKWN HOMES,Mc,-A request to;pre,eone,approximately 75 acres of vacant land located at the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues to a density of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)-APX: 225-152-01,02,02,04,&18. F. EN:VlRt)Nt&9TAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AG—R}?EMENT 89 03 BLACKMON HOMES, INC: -A request to .appr(,ve a development agreement for 78 single family residences on approximately 25 acres of vacant land located on the northeast cor/te' of Highland and Rcehester Avenues APN. 225-152-01, 02,03,04&1% G. ENVIROXMENTA:t� .ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TJAC,T 13351 LEWIS:AOMES -s A residential subdivision and design , review of 118 condominiums on'5 lots and 8 single family lots on 9.07 acres of land in the Medium Density Residential District(8- 14 dwelling units per.acre) within the Werra Vista Planned Community, located at the southwest conger of Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avenue-APN- 1077-091-34. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUARIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 897-o2'-CTPY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG1§ An amendment to the land use definition of"building maintenance servieeO to include small operation'building contractors which meet certain criteria. r 1. ENVIRg?4MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDMOSAL USE PEItMI -�89-15 -'UNIGLOEE REGENCY'_ RAVEL -K request to establish'.a travel bureau in a leased space W9,978 square feet within an existing office complex on 4.24 acres of land in the Maven Avenue,Overlay District*located at 9227 Haven Avenue- APN: 2*4V,723&24. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MODIFICATION , TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-14 - NEW HOPE CHURCH-A request to expand an`existing 7,204 square foot ohureh b1772,28$ square:feet within an existing industrial park on 20.7 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3), located at 9121-1& Business Center Drive-AP14 209-021-39. VIL Old Business K- HOME OCGIJPATIO'N PERMIT'89-185 - DOLAN - An appear of staff's decision to deny a Home. Occupation Permlt for amulti- track recording studio located,in the Low Density Residential, District-(2-4 dwelling units per acre) at 9292 Arrow Route - AP1gt 208-361-19, (Continuer?from May 10,1989.) VIM Directok%?deports L. THE 1989/90 AND 199e,121 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET r 1X. commisslon Buenees �` f X. Public OO;nmehts C This is the time and placc for the general public to address the. Commission. Items to`be'discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. ML Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted A dministrative Regulations that x., set.an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items yo beyond that time, they I• shall be heard.only with the consent of the Commission. f! t , E _ , t r _ i Now= a MIA MAP 1), t �~ ww `. CdsLSni ERM�n FaM•9 Now, an ° � wdN- p.. =26so g�rsllw '� ® 4CItt ALL, ®a `,. 4_;, arrNR+e• - L1�N PARR _s'7 r � r r ArA• � -, i Aa g i GUGANUNGA•6UAS11 Gd of, RRdIdNII 'a¢M7 .. � ON/ARId INI6NNAtIdMAI AIMOIIt' C OF ` —�FW+wt• O -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE, May 24, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner !i BY: Steve'Hayes, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME ,ATENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87.20 - INLAND AREA Fr' .' i - A request o allow a chu7h within an existing ',ee-sc¢oi"For Kids Only" ft.:ility, on 1.18 acres of land in the Low Density Residential Dist-ict (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the south sine of Base Line Goad, east of Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1077-061-09 I. ABSTRACT: The applicant is -equesting a 9-month extension. to continue-the church use at the above-referenced location (see E::hibits "A" - "D"). Th;.; Planning Commission may grant time extensions in twelve (12) month increments. The applicant is making this request in order to allow enough time to complete improvements on another proposed church site which will not be ready for occupancy until October 1989. The approval for this use pill expire on Dune 24, 1989. An extension of time could be granted by the Planning Commission if facts for findings cen be made. 11. BACKGROUND: Ccnditional Use Permit 87-20 was originally approved y tne Piannine, Commission on June 24, 1987. The approval for CUP 87-20 Included conditions revating to the operation of the church at the "For Kids ,Only" facility {see attached Resolution No. 87- 99). 111. ANALYSIS:: Staff has not observed any problems associated with the Chu -c operation at this site. The church has complied with the Conditions of Approval. Preliminary discussions have been conducted between staff and the church in re-locating to an existing building within the City. This, in conjunction with the fact that no alterations have taken place with the Development Code and General Plan in this area, results in a project that remains consistent with the requirements of the City. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission may grant time extensions for projects in 12-month increments (up to a maximum of 5 years), -if there have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element, Development Code, or character of an area within which a project is located that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent or nonconforming. ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: CUP.87-20 TIME EXTENSION' i May 24, 1089 Page 2 The approved project is consistent with the Gcneral Plan, and the objectives and requirements of the Developm "nt Code and with all of the original condition's applicable tothe-Japproved church, The proposed use will not°bef detrimer'.a"s ro the public health., safety or welfare, nor will it be matey,=.' .y inj'urioua to properties or improvements in the vicinity. V. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above Facts for Findings, it ,is reconnended that the Planning Commission;`approve a 1-year time extension for Conditional Use Permit 87-20 through adoption of the attached Resolution: AResly m' ed; cityr Bull I BB:SH:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B"`- Location Map Exh i bi t t C" - Si.to Pl an Exhibit "ou - floor Plan Original Resolution of Approval - CUP 87-20 Resolution;of Time Ey,tension - CUP 87-20 A 7- A j P.O.Box Al Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 (7141 987-1200 Bill Flanders Pastor FROM: Inland Area Fellowship TO: Planning Commission; City of Rancho Cucamonga DATE: April 23, 1989 SUBJ: Extension of Conditional Use Permit No, 87-20 RE: Resolution No. 87-99 Dear Sir: In accordance with Section 3:1 of Resolution No 8.7-99 we are hereby requesting a nine (9) month extension of our Conditional Use Permit to use the "For Kids Only, Ltd," facility located at 10213 Baseline for a church. We have purchased property at the corner of 19th and Amethyst, and have started the processing of applying for a Conditional Use Permit to use the facility at that location for a church. Due to the time required to obtain the necessary approval and, complete the improvement on the site and building, we willnot be able to use the facility until September or October, at the earliest. We have requested a full nine (9) months in order to cover any delays that may occur in obtaining our Conditional Use Permit or in Construction. We are requesting tha: all other conditions of the permit remain the same. Thanks for your consideration in this matter. sincerely, Chuck Carelli, Elder Arf: t,,a:ed weith The Baptist General Conference OF RANCHO UCA OTC z. ,. -- I } ----- m,aw: Q MUSAC&A ....,....a... r� •�c" 11`, ,.� Bw M tW q'1 � ••MwsiwsY� !. . r 1 •.i � �•j e i �. I .tl I -•Pli.os.w � 1 � �d a. w SITE UTILIZATIQN MAP NORTH CM? OF ITIRM.- nv ' ► PLANNING DIVISION A EXHIBIT: SCALE:..�:,�„ 1 Original Poor Quality s seWwe ROAD _ 1 It A SIIE DATA , .,- �`�,`' «aarrsarr-c.aa e..eerur• rttr�{ u.-P 11M1. MIA �Il fO rl. !F •EEZ rr -e• �arMr SiTE PLAN NORTH (ITY OF ITEM:.. C v RANCHO U N a �. PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT SCALE:. - � i%7.^7,Kd�6C%dt4Q'wiEc`^'" Pr Qua$}ve - - _ ' ��W�J GKIiNyFGP� ••.• ' s"##c4 1 8Ui1.btNG y Ants 7 , rR.��ets.4o• J:.vv-.w pow NORTH NORTH CITY Or, ITEM: CUP 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' s I 1 t� r' PRCd�4S6A♦♦ rf. �,fjJ STQA. n'KIClTdk �� I a .Cry4va 'N AR4A� snrnfj StuFtrm .• Il+r`ANT CAA: ."t yrt+s. t 4uK!K ALLf✓lf.� f � /`/�• flsspotE4 , wrwryfy�ysi��-. SdMifN4 l�Rtp ° r r' / ! r` ♦ ,"r" �•ARE INFANT CARt +,, .tfnalc nwGGwt d�ias o I 1 }Je�� +j}p�;/may`�j�1�yT��y�1��lf ITEM. PLANNING VI () � `� } RESOLUTION NO. 87-99 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-20 FOR A CHURCH WITHIN AN EXISTING PRE-SCHOOL LOCATED ON THE SOUTH S,')E OF BASE LIRE ROAD, EAST OF TURNER AVENUE IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - APH 1077-061-09. WHEREAS, an the 21st day of May, 1987, a complete application was filed by Bill Flanders for review of the above-described project; and WH"EAS, on the 24th day of June, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, 1�1REFORE, the Rancho Cu amonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be -met; 1. That the proposed use is in accord w4in the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the ..onditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health,, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2 That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmenTIRTWat a Negative Declaration is issued on June 24, 1987. SECTIM, 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 87-20 is approved subject to-" olTowing conditions, 1. Approval is limited for a period of twenty-four (24) months, at which time the facility shall revert to its primary use, unless extended by the Planning Commission. If a time extension is necessary, a request may be filed by the applicant 60 days prior to the expiration date. 2. Hours of operation shall be limited from 8:00 a.m. to 10.00 p.m. on Sundays and 7.00 p.m.. to 10:00 p.m. on weeknights. Weeknight nw,ttings shall not occur more than twice weekly. Fui-,,her, in no case shall church activities overlap with the primary hours of the ",For Kids Only" Pre-school in a manner which creates a shortage of on-site marking. Cunt Zd9 roh SerVof setg Page bu;-kdi�►9Q b a io i�'�o the �,�..1� 5e ng`Sna�lpa;Ck;ns S site and $eatl be lip;�; °e co��p�7n e. porti0� ha ;n 3. Sad a�are'A to 0,tAesoiltq ked at a1 otterq a tore ��ai or o be Par$a shall e�Pans CaVe'.TlAt." a,��e the d{IAcax'011 ludir-S io aA lial �s®� ;�e Co��,�1101, mo in dit t,�a ifi� anY My anon, the °� shall Oij sP� and of A• oceV�s;on to ;s ""Uetne lndu5ard;nt a the tip ti+ o t`1 e° G eQ royal °5er;ti°ntai'le Hain r�*it 5. N\4A5 � ao ileac SPeci�io P,e tion&l ssa CitYk all n;tY or is CQndi Mith to aP91C0Id1 c ancy• roPosedi rc0 o re rev t l%iti°�' t 4 1ni 6. Rl alb Saes aG gar v{;on P ;or dlt;ona1 ptsd °ru sh n ord antins pi �,is Gon aiihborins ousht and by tta'` T eration fits to sha 1 e Cr rave ti tbt adverse Use pei®� For and 1 oa a Gon'iit�;g coos lk of the use ' sub'ita R nbe tQ s{tide ter�ieat bars 1 fir tt��r `��i� neoessarY � EOOOiy;S;on etGolpt a 1 S. apPrOyed bfid S f �MOSVI-y o�oygie u ft 0 OAS, to ssildin1 Pr{Or not betel eta Viet CD yisip° ya aPPrO siyall y;ty► u 1din9 an afety built ee Ar d Ill g ldin9t i t. 9. 6avo' to shift of otion sis irP Sags# 1 ;re toeiTA &O®tbil Ok c , PLANNING COMMtISS RESOLUTION NO. CUP 87-20 - INLA AREA FE"DWISHIP June 24,. 1987 Page 3 APPPOYED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 1987. PLANNING COMM4ISS10 F THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY..** c ` 'c lei, a rman ATTEST: ra 7 VeVQV Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning CAemission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing_ Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Corniission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning ComAission held on the 24th day of June, 1987, by the following Yota-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, PLARESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS NONE ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS; NONE s 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTIOM OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-20, A REQUEST TO ALLOW A`CHURCH, WITHIN AN EXISTING PRE-SCHOOL FACILITY, ON 1.18 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE APN: 1077-061-09, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for, the above-described project, pursuant to Section 17.02.100; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commissions conditi nally a}proved the above-described Conditi-41 Use Permit. SECTION 1; The Rancho CucLvnga Planning 'Commission has made the fol� °wing findings: ?) The previously approved Condit".ar Use Permit is in substantial compliance with the City"s current General Plan, SpecW . plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies; and (b) TPie extension of the Conditional Use Permit will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current G,ilner:? Plan, Specific Plans, Oedinances, P'an3, Codes and Polities; and (c) That the granting of said time extension will not be detirmental to the public health, safety, or welfara, or materially injurious to properties or improvem3nts in the vicinity. (d) The extension is within the time limits prescribed br state taw and local ordinance. SECTION 2: The Rancinq Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a tf.ae extens on or: Project Applicant Expiration CUP 87-20 Inland Area Fellowship June 24, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION' RESOLUTION NO. RE, TIME EXTENSION FOR CUP 87-20 May 24,''1989 �. Page 2 AP'PROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. ftNiel, ,chairman ATTEST: rao u er, ecretary I, Brad Buller, Secret2\ry of the Planning Commission of tho, City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foreg5ing Reso,at,k was 'duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by i.he",Planning Gommisslan,of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a, regular muting of the-planning Commission held on the 24th day of M'ay,,198% by the following doter' pit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONUS: TW 1 �� , — CITY OF ANCHO CUC.i-MONG Aft STAFF REPORT DATE: May ,tr. 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the rinning Commission FROM? Brad Buller, Vty Planner Steve Mayes, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION F)R CGNOITj6.NAL USE PERMIT 85-21 AND PARCEL 14AS - e eveFopr&enx of a :raster plan for a 27.13 arre industrial park and the first phase of construction consisting of a 58,000_square foot mini- storage facility with a caretaker's residence on 2.95 acres of la0 in the Industrial Pars; Diatriet (Subarea 7), located, at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, 26, 27, and 28. I. BACKGROUND: At its meeting of May 28, 1986, xhe Planning i,missfon approved the above-referenced Conditional Use Permit "ANN application and related Parcel Map 9998. Both projects ware granted one-year time extensions on April 27, 1988. The applicant is n av reouea;Ing a second one-year extension of tirsme fey the Ccnditiona] Use Permit and Parcel Map to allow additional time for recordation of the subdivision. Up to four one-year extensions are permitted by Ordinance. It. ANALYSIS The applicant has indicated that his intent is to proceedwith the final recordatio n of the Parcel VAp, and Beier development of the mini-warehouse partion of the master plan to a later date. In requesting the extensions of tirge for both the Conditional Use Permit and Parcel Maps the applicant would have the alternatives of completing the master plan as approved, or submitting a friadified proposal In the future, consistent with the lot configurations established with this subdivision. Staff is recom)endina o minor modification of Condition G.10 of the Parcel Map, The: condition requires that the eAisting buildings within Parcel 2 b-i removed by May 31, 1988, with the intention that this coincide with the original expiration date for the Parcel Map. A one-year extension wa:. 'granted with this modification, therefore, the new date should be changed to be consistent with the new expiration date, which Will be,May 23, 1990. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission may grant time extensions or projects in twelve month increm3nts (up to maximum of five years); if there have been no significant changes ITE14 B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 85-21 - MASI May 24"1989 Page 2 Ask in the land usa element, Development Code, or chzkkcter` of an .area within which a project is located that would ca:?;e the appraved project to become inconsistent or`non-conforming. The approved master plan is consistent with the C*neral Plan, and the objectives and requirements of the Development °Code; and Industrial Area Specific , Plan, With all original conditions applicable to the approved Master Plan, the proposed usa will not be ,atrimentat to the public health, safety, or welfare, nor will it be materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. IV. RECOMMENDATION: used upon the above facts for finoings, it is rec..;,;zznue a."the Commission approve a one year time extension for Condit o�sal Use Permit 85.21 and Parcel Map 098 through adoptior of attached Resolutions, Re '"allytStted r .r B +d Bu r Cit nner BB:SH:mi g At.taehments: Exhibit "A" -Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B° - L,�catl.a Map j Exhibit "C" Master Plan Exhibit "B" - Parcel Map 9998 Exhibit T' - Phase a Site Plan Original Resolution of Approval, CUP 85-21 Original Resolution of Approval, PM 9998 Resolution 3f 'Fine Extension CUP 85-11 ! Resolution of Time Extension PM 9998 f f k f ;; `� .: . �eba►s��an Last FOR.-My (-Most q3AUC w P.O.g0x,4 RANCHO CUCAMONOA,'CAUF gino rwrw oeairwrao 27 April 1989 Fan c^.o Cucemonga Planning Commission, Request a 1 yea.` extens4on or. CUP 95-21 »nd -_m cel azap 9999 so Gnat. 2 ;ay contxrue dcvelogzent of my prop;+`v r. x need the ti:rte ex4-eneicn in crd.er to arrange financing and other admin_strat_ve - a-scci=.te3 with drvelap nerrt. ainoerely, si Q.' CTY I I OF ITEM_. � ,� a RANCHOUC TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION �i 2- EXHIBIT:.2.L SCALE: „�. k i i t -• aerNu. ,I/ iadttFrs r. SITE 1 NORTH ,CITY OF ITEM RANCHO Ci CAMO '. TITLE: - ,,,�,J,L.AN,NlNG DIVISIONEXHIBIT: ' 3C'Aloi qw IM CD Ck lJ a a °'e OWE s i NORTH Alsk dTY OF ITEM: ...:� 'RANCHOCUCAMONG TITLES i tl I DIVISION EXHIBIT: ' SCALE: raw w /f �•`�1�t � ,rl��' �•� •o�rlt'.1n.m� ,� � 'n's,��' i �r� _tt ':ss.u�tCc_7•-"r._ �Ms ;'ash_a„` �-w t � � Original Pour Quality a r NZ � . . UZ VXW�91 IZTITIRETTI I I I Fm I I ITfill, .r., a � - NORTH t OF TEM.. . RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE- PLANNING DIVISION ' EXHIB*IT: . ,.SCALE RESOLUTION NO. 86-72 A 'RESOLUTION OF THE RAN= CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-21 FOR APPROVAL OF A MASTER PLAN OF UEVELOPMEW ON 27.13 TOTAL ACRES FOR THE FIRST PHASE OF THE MASTER PLAN I?EVEIOPMENT FOR A 58,000 SQUARE FOOT ' MINI-STORAGE FACILITY WITH A CARETAKER'S RESIDENCE ON 2.98 ACRES, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT CATEGORY (SUBAREA 7) APN: 229-W-10, 19, 21, 26, 27 and 28. WHEREAS, on the 2L`th day of April, 086, a complete application was filed by Jack M. Masi for rd�� ew of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 2$t'n;,day of May, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissiin held a public h4Aving to cons-:der the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, t,)pQ.,Ranchc Cut.umonga,Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That ';ho, following finding; can be mez: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district •in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed .use complie''s with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen a do -Wiat a Negative Declaration is issued on May 28. 198e. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 85-21 it approved subject t—o-ffi-e-f3l7owing conditions and attached standard conditions: Planning Division: Master Plan: 1. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. For future development, the subsequent phwses shall be subject to r discretionary approval by the Planning Commission per the II appropriate review procedure prior to the issuance of any building permits. Modifications to the master Plan shall be subject to Planning Commission approval, ` � PLANNING COMMISSION R LUT1gN NO. CUP 8641 - MASI May 28, 1986 Page 2 2. A Master Laodsca a Plan for the entire ro eGt area shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Design Review Cowittee prior, to the issu;oice of building permits for the first phase of the development, 3, Public transit facilities such as bus stops for the project shall be provided. Detailed plans for street furniture, such as the bus stop, shall be submitted for Design Review Committee a review and approval prior to issuance of building permits before the first phase of Gonstruct�*n. i Phase 1. 1. The final acoustical report to reduce, the interior noise per the City requirements for the d4retaker's residence on Rochester Avenue shall be submitted for review and approvk) prior to issuance of bui"l di ng�pemi is for Phase 1. 2. A means of secvndiry access shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire District, 3. The Rochester entrance driveway shall be a minimum 35 feet_-ln width. d. The necessary easements for the drainage ditch shown along the southerly property 'line shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Building Official, S. All site drainage shall exit through approved drainage devices to the satisfaction of the Building Official and City Engineer. Engineering. 1. Notice C+f Intention to join the proposed median island landscape ma?ntenance district shall be filed with the City Council prior to the issuance of 'iuild ng permits. 2. An easement for drainage from the area to the west shall be provided prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. 1f a project is to be constructed prior to the completion of the Day Creek Channel Improvement Project, the project shall be provided with flood projection measures based upon an approved final flood report. 4. Parcel flap 9998 shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. All conditions of approval are contingent upon final recordation of Parcel Map 9998. 5. Existing overhead utilities along Rochester Avenue; PLANNING COMMISSIR:'""°ESOLUTIm N0. CUP '85-21 - MASI May 28, 1986 Page S Aft A. The lines along the west side of the street (project �,. site) _,Shall be placed underground from the first north`'�ofh oA" Streeter at limits he timto e ofrsst pole eet construction. 81 A fee mall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits equivalent to one-half the cost of undergrounding lines on both sides of the street, except 66KV or larger electrical, less the cost of undergrounding the lutes on the project side of the street. The limits for the fee shall be from the south property line to the center of "A Street. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY, 1986. PLAN ;ASS ION�THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: t 1."1.� . . aY1R=an ATTEST: �Ci2�"'"'�✓ --Wr-a`d--Bu1Jer. Deputy Secr4tary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the V ty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ctirtify that the foregoing Resolutioi, was duly and regularly introduced, passed; and adopted by the Planning Coamission of the Ay of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Manning Commission held: on the 28th day of May, 19%, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES; COMMISSION71s: REBEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL NOES: MISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT 0.�a G tiF O YO o Lie ut iY� nT�nN — p Y o 3 'oY ?To — uvaQL �Y � nr nLo oa.Q�q _ oae 'eb pM eF«'aY O V 8.� u.0 emu. r gg�q V� T.zQ e� G V C1 QLC G - a4i„r. 4�L Yy v M.3O sG �_.v.,� c....r— L 3' 1N > OrN Y G Gy. A G4u �— qt G06 �N ppV -.0 N. PCs�s NYG L9 O O�V O LAN p> 90 1. L.V 'J ,CO OVO C,`Cg0 NN��6V OC.p� pY.Y4 Y.�`llQ^. qq N y 15 7 O4VY Qf.� 'NH J YYGCL p�q�ja7uY' M yyC Vqy^'uG: yC YI YY V� 44O 6� 6C^N OV O L`^Y�GO S-N dlLt•� �OGlyi CYN A�< �U�� 60A= �a•7V�LI O b C .bjD �aaL��oo �C I fifi y O rU a. N C. I �Qtl `�� ZaNYYY=p� A $ b$ Z. 5-0 4 O L o u 01 a L u 9.. A G b C Y Y • L y a p O^JL e a J �: l t NL �NTWd•O Y. O Y � npp0� 4 d6 O �V L N L OCv 6ON �Cj o 6 _ F.o WI1f . carom e.d an..a.. i+Ws.n ma m v Uur. a .�,g'�a.,� V "a t.lj'.4 X. . R tyro R'p OO�gO.Q USG6� UAL ».Sir d.' y44 L^qT 6.a. 1Y dII=y .Aw u� �.0�y dOy W,C 9..Y ayO prC m- .q b` y W+C�a 4M aW . 5 ca`�q ``o"°}°{tea d.=. y'o•,m,"pc'= ` Q 'y°_.'` ' r LA Yro " was Ste' �a. `. •L �i C .^., b N P .CAB et n t 4� 2%�M '.!f O ilut: y V � a_rY'�N ��.W'q ro.�'w.a i�r-a�•�o .m.�++ `e"'A� � y. M �.y?� ,�... gMcr �' i C 4• m t>a e p C d a r M N N �'n c�t A RV o Q 4 i r y b-0 N w Tp b?CSC^.O-0C1 CQ HL =.`p.6GK br m w da 4 `NTbwv ra.•ti map][ �+..�. �� NP y�Nb« N.p, a^y .,CCw�` ,xu � <.N• '� YA'� +O uOL.m. �4�'^w P� � �'�'<5R 0.4 -"ST. rPWU 41 V r Uf. MOY CSI Al NgNgCNab� 4T'yyy��pp{{ 1T�Pq} Y.4�m 'q iq.� ' R��,}C 4WY�� m��y mG 4yn. C yaw.t6.m>C!'9'{{., �v �9 uy Cy19, vs�.■rM _^ C■. _ Lti �m 4aa.'U..�.Q eQs WC u0� �rt:C. m � uAP4C p C� i'xD +n CO2�CD�]w yC c+ y tC @r50. aNum.- YIrNw�l�Myti GW +G 4.Nw Wr+4 Wr-'+ L?C K4A�� NaR ti ••�• C � M IR 4 .(f k Aineno aaod }eu,21 �bu�j v.yCP rum 4 .rC. ..b. itVa � ty. Ku 6 r Pub WAY ✓, p D4�C �LN ye,•ia 4u<r+' r= `+ b` vyT♦ +r1Ta Qu y"^ uN.RY' U. r.?qCN I� QC y� c�{sip�� , Na4 Ci. �pNYw CB.rP. NY6 '� '«ti'y�o~1*.,,Y. �6x U Cun Oy1 y� SaSM iF O. �rYf'b1Kw..ppgy yya W� rn 4 CA�G 4 y*tiy p6y mNf"' C^ ubwc.Z NyU N� g^msiO 4f`CVO Yana►j,wy� � GrggOu c s4uU r ..� 'ACQ""'a -1Mtt w}w 0. Im.O Yr V L f ro T 4 9 �b NC .,J.wro y. yCb.3 a+.U..�4 QW Tg MT L.'` O syb ap.. R ¢ V RP t} niM ��+;,.« "",,,Q.+�.. "�•t Lq 4C�.Ga.�..i�� b vg6 C Ky�e y ca L B. �� cari -K. p, ih'NqWy'gR~A�e yy'bw Qr DbW Vt HE >C CSb O C 4 b a 4 CC` --s: V46.,Z:,- OP 1P T C V bu qua ,c.c>+c d tea. A4 s veo a4 Nx ya `Fad. ac 4 ad > L4 4sP1'4 V ui~A�gWVUF m aa.,omnn m nWmF + I �. C av'Fy az y�srat L .c a.• 'o v. ss Wv++x7c+-.� •...r�:.ca' _ �}'.crtL - a • a`ow �Lo a G °`v aoo-.:a��xgo cL m= � .L G:aY s Y ai IIa�. ¢' N Pa GG d�On qdL C dA0 w CO�y da E v u L Ca L„d N 5— yM aat= y. no Nam.. p, xr oa _ iNv Y EL q�i� q V. - -wU II�y T d �, V O�y. E�J Kt,_ }. Cud G 6 .tied t .Y..•O• L:L d (�y LL-' Od q CND C cNtl a ^� Ol p•' y � LQ G y. HYT d YNL tl.:�gV1n pII Lam. �Y G GO'� o. EC..Nw L '6C.ru LC d�d ux dLA_>YG.C. Y G Lq ep+l E OO•.wY //.Vy a Y C 6' \ N Luy �• 1.of q N Q N.� Q M y N 0 H y t Q N Y Ol i a N 6 V Q q�O L 6 Y ¢N 6 N •^y ca 1 d Ca d d�a dA it Ell L - Yd Ge q01 nG6 .- La dV �Otl .. ay o�o q•- er sus. ra« ass GC. YS a�wd =..aa .N.6= C�. C C N C ,Y¢. "l I YJ•Ca�� Y 01 J -OO pglL� L O 9dd C NY V- AY..AVC. �wyia LIIV a gII4yG � 'H �,.h d .t! ^L• w 2 O • MQYt ea3ry aCl Y09r ..•� r Ya Ni.�C IIy Cca New 6 9v NL o�Y£s 040. itloua d YYwo . .. < d4.• � ar r Y.E q G 0.60N aY.tl>pi. L gyy N a L N Y .Yi�. y g C Q Y G g a y q NAY 'su�^ ...� q4 6 La 1.� sL G-@ 0 Nq - NY. dam. L i -C EG L. f1 .n N 6 YnYOjV.�: M N N 9 4 w • II w b v 0 w O c^. ar. ¢q ..Z2"C.a.@ �O Y 1 d Y Y a N • pL•+ N O m O�O T^ q"to. t C ti L � .di.CLLu a y'_.- • L et: � gIION �� Y,�y Cc � C Y NO•• y. O}n 4.0 Y q �pG'q.�y. V [II,[g0� 90G} Y II a O�Y Nv 2 Nq O PII f�Yr dOOn �eGyye C aC �YG L .sGjCC 4rQCC �C N d L 9 Y .•.q IIN.•= .L..GOCr'Q4 p.Ni. II yYdSC q V9 yy A y0NY 'y= • 4LOgC u•�G�^ p..Gt pGy 7yd f1 O= UAL L Y • M. .+ LQ a ndL uEa vFd- L ". ¢�.'.`¢ :c ye w`.oo. i Qo_w ryaN « a.o •L-`o.'n=wy <a c. QN`a`.T uao.L.vl�y�. L^ w N rt ► Yy. ap u �. N III 4 W GC a• CAC _ Ovdi cC n T•.L. U`O E d U o O � � i• 4. a�.S 08 U 1 aT F OGa E+n4 U OJ 6 GL O• L� (� o�� Ys-+ �y '}o aQ L,tl �}v b � ro Y.d "•..0 t O u � D 0 U ro U Y U z�N A w 4 d � L r • _ 1 �.�i V Qro �L Ey 4 paL 2 4Cfy u..tlNi C ON 1 ' 4XJ UM 9y�F O ^ �OYQ a +N il.w .�`. • ?�� C L N i'. i U c; V SUbC. q � • 5 I � p v � dQ ~ � L � u d C •e. ' � '��9 µ,•pc ��' _�_ w _t. e w L�R� art Sic n 6A ` �� 4z �L �.Bo cum a.a'.A.Sa 'nov yy �a yy e�Gv v W s'S A rb0 }4� _EEC � OW Q SV�w CA aNi rT•.W 9%ydV 7V OaNeY�.L9C. O MC •NJ ..t Cy4td�D• LL LC YC •O q.Oi.E O qYN .r_ q J•�Y A4 N1',•' 6M.wCQ ..:a+. iJ Cd O•t C? 9 LiS, !q" t�pti U ya get N Ow NTNC b...0.4 24p L N1.al. tOJ N��SSGC OCwO LV« •� J r+ O L w yy �. 9 N,•C.4 Y w VV GOO 8 6 � A N2T 9. y44 YOYD .. �C �Ja U 4. �N • .. ' ap'z J C tl. C�'U OpJ b VLN LD 0.A S �D O m.> S N=Y«. b Wa�4 LUfz A- p 4N..G• /��•p@ � ' A a 4 a'4 L.., L �L C L e Lr.•TY p b C 19 fV O , 1I d6 � �OU +.•PLC ^•�+4 S dO fA.0 IT SYp LL OU�.r � 1 FL•s4•�O �C C a•- �:.• O b .GO«Y LRwuT.Ct 6Vq 3. - 44^•' 31r L.M O• p N � 1�U413t.'0.�44WN &:'^''i�•.Q N N V N 10' 1��. D O • N � p ��' 1 i ot v-•LT cv '�� da VAS �ro dy ae .ao � pd - ui t.'^Z.-1 •b•� 5y. b q 4 q-Z6 . cppL �c am.» 9oc. 9 ',c ad'.CC .:.:°• `qL v ati oN•dy' � OR 4y � L aV� V 0�00 �� LN•rw+ 7 C YOB I 4YT �. Q L p3iu Y 6paM N �p� MLA LO a q� N c Y�� +i!U .•pdr p � .q`"' .b TQ. Y d:v Cw q N2 C paU/i .O+�a Y dtN C N^ V Y O Q C.N Q CN 1 �.�q4 a i-r51Z!/ yuu. N qa •f itC�[ d$.� oy `C �u0.j.N 4LC4 �.�ai 4 4ab.. �LVy L p.0 W,ga 9 LY p� a 'C CL ds �.LAT Cp C:Kgg Ma..Oi I LCM� M� A s<✓ ;yyo.av y �.oroi..b7a tL ...a'o. L.L.• a.:" ac-�� I RO T.j .4N YUV L' v.V q s aN - u.L. v.i y.lOnd �w„LQ„a�i d�'O O.O� 6 y 2a.. '•• O d O d a4 u0 A:u U ,_?.. N �. 014d� Q QN pL G D ^bN N.aro O diCs �. v TOr `V9li d nip T. tNO =t,, Tu M AO C �Q�✓a G.W G QL .g Cw.0 Z 4Nttf9 60� WA ty� 9r Ci NL.L. CC d 'GOLw=C O K YNV ATJS C } SA.0 a;K w, 9Z%b. Nu Y•L �.d ba � u Ck�^b• MC N EG N+y' ;aW NL •pN N�2.q G�,•U•,yl� 9++ 6 Ca q C bbq �dQ� L.0 aU Vim- lTiOb IN wl L•O• 1 b� v yw b yip Cpr.. `S•G y...vY C� C b *Y w•�N'M.'Lt N t 4r.pbt p N4 ORL' Lm?L� Y Y d�'*• 9 G O C C•"• U9 CL 4'{'JIY COP L( .. V4 RC N J_Nw.7 V'b CN d� C� +4••4.•€E ' wUOC a C L A G p.n aCg b b M IyQ, A N d V N N '7+•1 e( �6 4 41 C V N'� yt 1y 11F. W L•Y 14!Y w Y .: I N cGd oo�st �a� z I" 2 T 4s �RE. qro_cp 6 Y IC+ �Xy CiwGi _ O 4pY C T I D �.L i•41 E �. O u f K g q c p ki. pQ� �.d CQ�b '�d nb y N T •4> : WEp.+i sm CP. wb6 wC�d•e L ..CyN w w b4 `. G C L^ .ftr C yb Tb @ W q6 o � UYR fLY q�. 4NN 1 Y4�d N� Gq`f amp 9�C.. C RG.^ 60TL.-.d. �+OC N�1\J N .� quA G, '.E O NE 7 V b�•� 46�. �+'. �.... E G c u L b « wi a R T aa O R ro': d a y.b y..m a.u. 6 o V Y o T 9, o a V Y N ^ p y N y +S O` a 7- ` Is G q OD^W 4w 1 �N 1.lO 6b O:Y RVa 4� � - L 'O d. y.e• a. C O�V T 4 l c d O�.a.b �q'# y 0 u- N Ca 1C C _ti V St C 4rm tlC .Q�. L.rNid 0.+.'Cr. N.. y p' 4 t d �. .� i`N O i- q 01 y L.T� L..N�■ W d : ti.N 4 D s O CV 9CC a {�. �_O Y bC Gyy c� a br N acuy. ng G.yp�. vq q •d„ N 9 {{{ ■ �� '2FQ C pa Nq V V4M 01 O `�. Ou C �u~ M 1 CN cc tt (S iHHt 9 g W Y. Dr CVO =p C.�-VN o ul LV �U C' .OM q` aq A ` Y ✓b �R �® N�Mp A#M C 1 QC �•q n pOQ.S • y.q•'� 4 Ce4 `O �pOJ ay QQa^ Y qdt�y wQNp Cp`C L: 06 O N Nu. eVJC 01.. ~O. S HE V .a a x L.T w y d H p.; NN V= YO �V CV qr0. H ta- C= dam.. N CMC ww dy. 4 CI u= A.tl L N NQ L t JV `O 9L LO O. jy2* ibO 4 6 N 4Y .^q PC CdN oy mod' 0.00.� uL Cp GM C P ^19 9 4 O 4 xe M d 1.P O M,_ w np.c wuv 6 u.nX 45 40: -t M. wa s 9 A u R .TiO� O: GOO O.L E • O GGG� �. i. $x ` a. o� L o a q0 c a •c. .L.�e� No�� d!+ N c G t✓ � S. G _Ia � _ N ,�� d o ^ � GA G a noE 4 ❑ � u :. � Cl OO.q 6••OI .. y U O .Li _ IJ Y,VW4qCUB••^ Uy. C.0 ^q dyL� N� L C -ab Gp C Cl� OI ^Lq qe✓N N Z «W W NO 3t =Su.Q n Oq �'. O .... b ee�� .e•5 '� V lyrd 60 C 4L Cl- 31 of rn s 2 L S C N O L. •^e' •G,�Cj d fi-Zp dC p•N Q<QL. WW L Ct. O GW:d DN �G ¢ 3 c !t^G A. q.O p� ',W N� dC as C C O• 6J ✓ O y ...d. p y ^ �; US Zt L.^� "OI �• Y d ��M rq. G� ^ •�. �D N�� d�Lp ^✓uL. 4N N^W J Na Y IJ G S* L. CC^ NL O �✓ d n. LdL ... yC KqY C�`� 66 N.O.�.� N9 6Mw+ QU 6� W •L U 26 f.id t w0. CC{ ^b N C M ��``1€i � a W ••O` C �+`tl6 if ' iNe. .dam Dv. �p�a:.�. '�^ ■yc � c L u �^L U� N G G§ y m. T y 6 n I L P W•" p, ^D C y p ub D- -u cZL GY »� M � qc•„ y. �.� a N i l y B �✓O✓ C d 7p. IN�C OUi n C �� O.p .may L @ appp,,� ✓ ' G u�. A ti Q) b q ..T '�� C b f• C 09n O a a L I @ Ot .fir W W �.� • � N �U qp ✓ a " N e uE a .p. q.-�. .'a... — p q W E w. q ✓Pr d u p C L V q q � L•• ca cy —62 co q 01 a M p ++ u:q Y n RN A.Y L9 L d `y L L a �1+ •1U7. '• a U nu = p ai c cP `O t o Lu .�J C'p •/iy Oy • P N .. aYi a Cq a. •• dp b. M C N 2b 6 L 01 q L ^ V d L 4 b d n y.�, ^i. d •C �A G✓ � AA ✓ : u 6Fi �:= tp..✓ L L d` G^ d L66i=. L p G.d O ca dNo �VW 4 �yA�• o..C..�� 4 U.G 4:A. �C. .adua. C q.9•Ai O y.. .Y q � U 9 • ^ , •Q .Ni • p o i a w L u i 1 p A L Psi � a u �' Y✓ N� U � q IG v. RC N L L ^ �V•U �� 9y C. . O4 N � L� _C p Irt• e_ I: L a. � ".io ...x Lam•. $`Y �.bs .. a a. g. e,�ia gip• $� S �Nd�+ pa L W�' aY SL Y Lw�y M «2 S VA aL 1 ✓✓ 4V: NY. v8 O I✓ q y✓O CL NU G`N W. C.n:"o. �` t3V .•✓ ^u � �.uN yM 'p C. Y ✓ V LSi 01C q= Ol V pJN U-; v� O '°c L SC 4 '�N 8 �Y u do C `' M via. Du �'•C ✓c.^ Yu.✓u A mt q ^U OO.oi d"r < Ln�� Y. SY O.✓ ' � •r7 .p. ' ^ a <ON 4N .4i 1.pC o ✓.E.. rai t✓ Kl C RESOLUTION NO. 86-73 qP A RESOLUTION OF THr, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL. MAP NUMBER 9998 (TENTATIVE PARCEL 14AP NO'. 9998), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND -ciCHESTER AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Num,'azV`-9998, submitted by Masi and consisting of 5 parcels, located at the southwest cornet of,Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, being a division of Parcels 1, 2 and 3 of Parcel ,tap No. 4485, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San BernardMo, State of California, as per plat recorded`'in Book 40 of Parcel Maps, Pages 66 and'66, official records of said County, and the east 412 feet of Lot 17 of the Map of Rochester, in the City o, Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino; State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 9 of Parcel Mapa, Page 20, official records of said County; and WHEREAS, on May 15, 1986,_ a formal appli,ation was submitteii requesting review 0the above-described Tsntat ve:�ap; aril WHEREAS, on May 28, 19^', the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public 'hearing for the _ove-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE `RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION; RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made, ),. 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of Lthe proposed subdivision is consistent with the General 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposel subdivision and improvements will not canoe substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting ' property. SECTION 2 That this project will not create signif'cant adverse environmen a impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on Ma,! 28, 1986, SECTION 3; That Tentative Parcel Map No. S198 is approved subject to the recommen..e ,.onditiorts of Approval pertaining thereto. PLANNING COMMISSIG►'�--SOLUTION i PARC8L MAP P998 - ` May 28, .198E Page 2 Y APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY. 1986. PLANN rC ISSION THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: v1 er, cep, rman , ,ATTEST: rd U er, ep4 y ecre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meQtinq of the:Planning Commission held off the 28th day of May, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL., BARKER, REMPEI. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS, STOUT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMSA RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPRUAL LOVATIGH: Southwest corner of Foothill Blvd. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO: g91B and RocPeSt'4r Avenue. DATE FILED* May i5, 1986 ti LEGAL DESCRIPTION.Parcels 1 2 0 of PM 4485 NUMBER OF LOTS: 5 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Co. of San GROSS ACREAGE: 31.15 Bern. St. of Calif as er lat recorded ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 229-011-10 19 in Book of Parcel Moos, Pis 65 & 6 'f ,,22_, , 28 official records of said Co and the east4'12 feet of Lot 17 of the Map of Rochester, in the City of Rancho Cucamon a Co. of an Bern. bt of Calif, as Per'Pfat recorded in Book 9 of Parcei Maps, Page 20, official records of said Count DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEERISURVEYOR Jack M. Masi SAME Ultra Consulting Services P.O. Box 14 P.O. Box 5631 Rancho Cuca, CA 91730 San Bernardino, CA Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal 'Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited' to, the following; A. Dedications and Vehicular Access X 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary easements as showr on the tentative map, X 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way fat, the following streets (measured from street centerline): 6G> feet on Foothill Blvd. feet on Rochester Ave. feet art X ?, Corner property line radius will be required per City Standard$. X 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated �. as follows: Foothill Blvd. and Rochester Ave. except for approved access points. �z� r - 1 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring Ak access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. X 6. All existing easements lying .within future right-of-way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. X 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. B. Street Imarovements %rsoant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga ,_'Jicipal CcOaj Title 16,, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction on prio r ,I to recordation of the map and/or building permit issuance. X 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C.,,)avement, sidewalk, drive approaches, ,parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. X 2. A ;minimum of 26-foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half- sercion streets. X _ 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to bu ilding Per it issuance for each parcel. Cur A.G, Side- Drive Street Street A.C. Median Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk Appr. Trees Lights Overlay Island* Other j Foothill Blvd. X X ** X X X j Rochester Ave. X X ** X X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on ma,.,r j * Meandering. X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-og-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary',''Fay for the relocation `of any power poles or other existing public Amk utilities as necessary. -2_ Z� AWL 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded, X s. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic-,,control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern Californi _.W son 'Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shalt be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10, landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted t« and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuaite of building permit. X 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. C. Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agree6.ent executed to the satisfaction of the laity Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to building permit issuance for each parcel. 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the followings X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building anu Safety Uivisan prior to issuance of building permits for each parcel. D. Drainage and Flood Control X 1.. Private drainage easements for cross-Iot drainage shall ue required and shall b$ delineated or noticed on the final map. I X 2. (adequate provisions shall be made .lor acceptance and disposal j of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm dr" shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer i X 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for raview. i I S. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shai1 be E. Gradin4 constructed to detain increased runoff . X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Unifor,t Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substaptial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shalt be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. (i 3. A geologi&-Al report shalV,,be prepared by a qualified enginezr or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading'plan shall be subject,to review and approval by she ,Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of they final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division, for approval prior to issuance o' building permit. F. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: X Cal'Trans for Foothill Blvd. San Bernardino County Flood- ntrol District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water X"San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (req^iced prior to � issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C.&R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the nap. X 3. Provide all, utility services to each lot includ''ng sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructor, X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from Cal Trans. J X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval or the final map Will be subject to any requirements that may be received Prcm them.. X 1. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same-does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested," the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. B. Local and Master Planned Trails shall' be provided in accordance with the Trail Plat. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing ara weed control, in accordance with City trail stand?rds, shall le submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to- recordation for and/or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit. shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82-1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. Notice of intent join the proposed Median Is?<:d Landscape District shall be filed with the City Council prior to rert)rdation of the Final Map. G. Special Conditions X 1. Any structure to be constructed within 300' of the centerline of Rochester Avmnue prior to the completion of the Day Creels Channel Improvement "Project shall be provided with flood protection measures based upon an approved Firai Flood Report. 2. Any development to occur within the area west of Street "?'[ prior to completion of Master Storm Drain Plan Line 6 of the Terra Vista Planned Community shall be provided with drainage protection measures based upon an approved Drainage Report. X 3. If the on-site storm drain system is to be designed with a sump. condition as proposed, the systems shall be designed for Q100 with 1.5 Q10D catch basin capacity. X 4. Two fiieans of access shall we provided to each phase of the development and 'shall have a minimum paved width of 26' within a minimum dedicated width of 401. X 5. `ihe li=aits of street and storm drain improvements for each 1 phase shall be as required by the City Engineer. X 6. Plans for the internal .str�.ets and storm drains shall be suffivientiy completed to verify the feasibility of the design as approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of the Final Parcel Map. X 7. The proposed most, westerly driveway on Foothill Boulevard shall be designed for tAergency vehicles only. X 8. Easements for cross lot drainage shall he shown on the Final Parcel Map. X 9. Right turn pockets shall be provided at both entrances on Foothill Boulevard and Str-oet "A" on Rochester Avenue. X _ 10. All existing buildings Within Parcel 2 shall be removed by May 31, 1988 and shall be guaranteed by an agreement and appropriate security prior to Final Parcel Map approval. X 11. Parcels 4 and 5 shall be 'combined into one parcel resulting in a four parcel Final Parcel Map, X 12. The only opening in the `uture median island within Foothill Boulevard will be at Street licit. X 13. Ai: in-lieu fee "or one half of the cost for the construction of the"future median island including landscaping within Foothill Boulevard shall be paid on a front foot basis upon development of each parce adjacent to Foothill P ; evard. X 14. The building located within Street °C" shall be removed upon development of any parcel requiring the improvement of Street licit. X 15. Existing overhead utilities. a. The e-xisting overhead utilities on the west side of Rochester Avenue from the First pole south of the project limits to the first pole off-site from tF2 north project limits shall be placed underground at the time of street construction. b. Prior to the issuance of building permits on each parcel, a fry shall be paid to the City equivalent to one half of the cost of undergrounding all fines on both sides of the street, except 66KV or larger electrical, less the cost of undergrounding the lines on the project side of the street. CITY OF RANCHO CuCAiglMNBA LLOYD S. HURB5, CITY (ENGINEER RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERLMIT 85-21, THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MASER PLAN FOR A 27,113 ACRE INDUSTRIAL PARK-AND THE FIRST PHASE OF GONS'MUCTiON, CONSISTING O A 58,000 SDUARE FOOT MINI STORAGE FACILITY WITH A'CARETAKER`S RESIDK'CE ON 2.95 ACRES OF LAND IN THE INDUMIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD` AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAIrtNG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERLOV - APN: 229.011-10, 19, 21,, 26, tT, AND 28. WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time. extension for the above-described ►project, pursuant to Setion 17.02.100; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved tia, above- described Conditional Use Permit. SECTION 1 The Rancho Cucamonga Planning'Cornnissicn has made the following findings; A. That prevailing economic conditions havv caused a distressed market climate for development of the project. B. That current economic, marketing, and invertary - conditions make it unrevsonable to develop the project at this. time-. C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the integt of the Development Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially Injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension For: Project Applicant Expiration CUP 85-21 Jack Masi May 28, 1990 { PLANNING C0MMI:SSION- R60LOTION NO. CUP 85-21 MASI. May 24, 1989 u Paye 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY, 1989. PLANNING CO-'RdISSIU..`OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY; Larry T. WNW,, Chairman ATTEST: grad Buller, ecre ►y I, Brad Buller, Se.retary of the-Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify th,,c the foregoing P.esolution was duly and regularly introduced, passud, acid -:adopfiad by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga'; at a regular meeting of the Planning Co"ission held on the 24th day of My, 1989, by the fullewing vote-to-w`23 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: C0MISSIO'NL1S: ,. ABSENT: COWISSIONERSs �a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 9998, AND MAKING FINDIgGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, 26 4`7, AND 28. WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above-described project, pursudif, to Sertfon 1.501.8.2 of Ordinance 28-B, the ^,"ubdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above described Tentative Parcel Map on May 28; 1986. SECTION 1 The Rancho. Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following P,nc:'ings: A. fiat current economic, `marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time. w B. That strict enforc--ment of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. C. Mat there hts been no significait changes to the character of the area in which the project is located that would cause the project to become conforming or im;onsistent Witt current standards. -SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extens on or: Parcel Map Applicant extion V998 Jack Masi May 28, 1990 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY, 1989. PLANNING CO►KAISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. KcRiel, ChaIrman ATTEST: Braa Buller, Secretary r. PLANNING COMPISSION RESOLUTION NO, PARCEL MAP 9998 MASI May Z4,'1989 , Page 2 I, Brad Buller, Secretary ^f the Planning Comnissiot± of the City cf Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, .and adopted by the Planning Commission-of the City of Rancho tucamonga,; at a regular meting of the Planning Comaission held on the 24th day of May, a989, by the fo"0twing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCIA STAFF REPORT k DATE: May 24, 1989 TO: Chairman and Vkmber- of the Planning Commission Y FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Assistant Planner SUBJEGTz DESI6y REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13566 y CENTURY AMERICAW The Design Revi err of buii ng el eva i ons and deUP-77-eT � site plan for 75 single fami,'^r,. lots in a previously approved _tentative tract map c6'sisting of 154 single family lots on 28,' acres of land in the Law Density' Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of 24th Street, north of Lower Loop Road APh 226-111-02. Associated with this appiication are Tree Removal Permits 89-26 and 89-27. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of '01 ding elevation Plot Plans an ree RenovaT-Permit 89-27, B. Project Density; 2_.27 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Under Construction, Planned Community, Very Lbw Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Retention Basin; Open Space East - Retention Basins; Open Space West Vacant; Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: Project Site Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Density Residentiai (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Flood Control East Flood Control West - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) ITE14 C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 13566 - CENTURY AMERICAN May 24,°1969 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant with an average slope of 3% from north to south. The project site is bounded on the north by. Upper Summit and to the east and south by San Bernardino' County ,Flood Control District Retention Basins and to the west by a partial eucalyptus windrow and vacant property. II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: Tentative Tract 13566 was originally approved by -ffFe77l-a—nn1pg Commission on July 22; 1987 As a custom lot subdivision. On June D, 1988, a Design Review Application was approved for Si of the 154 lots. Century American is proposing to Aeveivp the remaining tots within the,tract (70) plus 5 of those originally approved with the previ;ws Design Review Application, for a total of 75. B. General The applicant is proposing a total of 8 floor plans TWTEF—includes reverse plans) each with 4 elevations, 2 with front-end garages and 2 with side-on gang-,;.s. The units incorporate design elements contained within the Etiwanda Specific Plar and have an architectural treatment similar to that previously approved by the Rockfield Development. Plan One is a single story while Plans Two, 'three and Four are two-story. Floor plans range in size from 2,870 to 3,378 square feet. C. Design Review Conm rua4s: Projec-t was reviewed by the Design Review:Committee on April 20, 1988 (Emerick, Kroutil) and again as a Consent Calendar item on May 4, 1989. the applicant has : revised their plans to incorporate recommendations of the Design Review Conaittee. D. Tree Removal: A previous condition of approval required submit-a tree removal permit application prior to recordation of tt�ee final map, in order to address the proposed removal of any portflib of the windrow along the western property boundary. Removal is necessary as pad heights have been raised for flood protection purposes and an off-site ! slope easement is required in order to mitigate resulting wall heights. totalThere will be a total 103 trees ll tr, and -o svbeen requested nning. i! for removall. Replacement planting of 5 gallon trees spaced 8 feet ncenter will be required. C - . i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF'REPORT r`,13566 - CENTURY AMERICAN May. 24,-2989 Page 3 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Tn'e project is consistent"with the Etiwanda Specific an, evelopmant Code and the Geoeral Plan, This project will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties'�, or cause significant environmental impacts. ?n addition, -,ithe; prapost:d use and Site Plan with the recomnended Conditions of Approval,. are in cowliarrce ;pith the applicable provisions of tone Development Code ara City Standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE:"`-property owners within 300 feet of the subject properly were notified regarding the proposed Tree Removal Permits consistent with :,'provisions of the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 276.` V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Comiission approve the Design Review of the building elevations and plot plans for the 75 lots through the adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval. Res l ly ed, Br• le : City Planner BB•CN-.sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site Utilization Exhibit "B" _ Si"e Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan` Exhibit "D" Elevations Exhibit "E" o Floor Plans Exhibit 'T"' Tree Removal Permit and Plan' Resolution and.Conditions of Approval F EXISTING OAS$ ^! EXISTING BA: EXISTING SA glisalrian Trull NORTI CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE-.Aa imll"Z40M& PLANNING DIVISION 1"- 4 EXHIBIT: SCALE: �I r �� Tfi.::l:�+�t�-..x��-.-.j� �.: +iLi►"�-i'RRY j�=iiC tT original Poor Qual'ty TRACY 1 �a fit INSDNd ' PEFtTv! low- ' (I � its- NORTY RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE. JZ74 PLANNING DIVISION � �' EX IB1Tr . SCALE: �, ON ' aio TT It r�.•, rr , ! ts' .' �„ ��-=- NIV It f 44 sLO p�w� oe NORTI TY OF ITEM, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION C EXHIBI'T:1--3 SCALE', � �� a � •r CI. ... _ � ^^"-tit '1�4fi.1\ UP L4 1. 4. Original Poor Quality < \ CD 41, ti �s i � • -- _ _ ZT" —mil• }� ( i . r � � � r =tea '' '•r L S S li i t� ' r$ry ter•- c� i � 4 I NORTI f 3F ITEM: A -. HO UCA GA, TITLE: Original Poor JOHNSON''! AROFEft7,� r k {YACi�1Yt1 f ,,�. • ', .. NORTI CUMA "TITLE.,.:.lim. PLANNINGIDIVISION C- i u EXHIBM. ...,SCALE ; .) i ,N... it n. r•M��• � t 1t 1 �� :y It jam' t 4 t I' '" 11 C It !(I t` •• s �� X---"r _ l ^err +� �•. 7�-4�•}°" 1 � NORTI `Tr OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: a -.---PLANNING DIVISION c, ` 1 � EXXIBlT:4 _ZSCALE: t 3 a a m A IMF- CITY OF O ,. i C CUCA O A TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION � �-r �' ��I�1`�:�'��LE: .�-�-- rigi rt"' ,©or Q ualty r�• .. �.R •� j-� �w/1 r.AN z III 4IT OF ITEM: .y w e . t I RANCHO CUCAMU -,A TITLE: ' t�`1-1 Jr.-��+itISNOYW tµIMIIItM • .... K Yl tegl wgltuKY .-�-+uMYtt • tf 1 1 H ,. f jJ /j It4t'0 CaEYIRiftllxlt � C .tt+aamcw.. �, �'y";�•yv f td+7�t T^j"* tr'� MN4u t "e Ti. 1��`rrr;{tns-m.�;tt�#"`. .. tit �, �o" .• .�,. i a PLAN I `,._,ecatwa �..w"�� CAL FormAR044 PLAN tr! .eeiltr COUNTRY BSTATi ....oeerott ttter.rerxmr «i'xtO P•ter4tRtfxww( .�.-.1Ntt40•'4tK(Ittt•CMcal •. tK VaCOt t Ilglw•.v'—�� ,Jj NVf':tl.fH'a t.Iot1JIM wROtbM[."S f• w9al/Iloa MMhta ,'i Y t Z . r �.—r l.r..+s.arc. L -!�S*`7iyu.v� �'2•b Y .tltea u7�'„ ^LaN 1G w t.ntt `.eel n BUNGALOW PW#i0 �-.w.....r �L— oewec Ytc'mow ."r Trott pt(p'utnlwxlrr4lelr ` �C tto PLAN f Aft ER HsTa ES C I 1`170F IT M 'ANCHO CUCA .A.IONGA : PL. I DIVISION � L sC L :rJtavz.....J'�✓��'+•�.'"�. i I,IUI�J!� II�IIM ""' "°'" "'* CRLIFORNlA RANGN COUNTRY ESTATE BUNGALO W ram. ffilleK ICTORIAN ` 7'��`{'1 M07 INNS PLAN 11 (31TY OF ITEMS .:RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLZ: 6f ,.PLANNING DIVISION C_- ) 5 EXHIBIT:2.. .,SCALE::.m� .� � e�Kyxnlrbl, a tlfwr4eac a.n rti,ad. �,+�y+n�y`'i• l, w'�IN�W u/"Iti l"u?'.+,aT� f �.i4'7.w�t.. . .14 41 PLAN.2A aruc<o,ertwrr OAUFOflN1A RANCH ``PLAN 2 9 1", ...�� .. onnu COUNTRY ESTAI[ m.ov ..,__V.wxo..maafas .—ea<an nr+a. .mae ce.atrs X I�.e<r ru<u -w.manaw ,Kta .w.l.11.�..�n. !;� "'�'•'iltabaMtl 1O�IIMyd MM: I �e'xntlrrn—�� .. PLAN 2C8`JNOARO'd( FLAN 20 t �..ran�--t+maaaw r�11 Yif;TOR1AH �-t>ao roar �.,.waar,act: fom.na .twt+nnworngl PLAN 2 �r F N7 -X PALMY E 0 ,AA ISS -= i 1 I i f f T 0 ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ' PUNNING DIVISION?' C EXHIBIT-O AW-SCALE: �.r...... CAUFORNIA.RANCH -- '. n 3> B COUNTRI`ESTATE. ti _: ;u-i F , �,:t^. 'pw 4.M+'•^r+'�..r BUNGALOW n.n +M nun VICTORIAN .ifR�.. L P411 UIf.. PLAN 2 uel- IT' S OF ITE -_ PLANNING DIVISION � �`� EXliIBIT: 8CALE: •.uo . u,.u-� �. / 1•eo«nn:,aa.w Fwa :�w 1 .Sw•_'may,f`'a�� •,��/ y�i� �s��,,�+fu� •nxoro,.ev-+ `CALiPtlANiA RAT! PLAN.3 i3. �.--.eoe,.a CouWmY 53TATE PI,AN.3A ._...,cou..o L-.ew ro+r "'`' .—...o m.o --eoe.e,r,atAo•r al {///''-''-''''��c.cn,f,uwcr ...:.a,.ea se+a .._ • 7/ '.,w ,n -It0 '�j�s�yL'1r� f! ^'k 'l,Fyv'il i L�1L].Gld „ G h •CLAN 3C _croua„e�,,,..,«. 1-.ee.,r. BUNOALOW PLAN _ \-.X..w. 1.,,,,,,,r. VICTOWAN i, 1 I OF ITEM: _ . RANCHOCUCAMONGA TITLE; &4 PLANNING DIVISION ZxHiBl .: ..SCALEA t ire � ��'' ��'i� ,1r�S ■t� � ��'� �� \�...-.i�Q9lI�II.. , � 5 _ i [` a IWNOaMt.l.la PV.a4/ufY.l9 1t If �� .MOo f'ae•( • �v ui•.•ii •/ _�yy •any - _ - ��.� z PLAN 4A CALIFORNIA RANCH PLAN-40 \ CdUN1'RY CSTAT •�.rv.a•b�.rev. �.PPP.t,.f., l-:oeoci.uu 13 .Kr`.IP Jt/LL/ul�a •-.,:a f.r nOlitN.P.P♦... )r /iKM ��LOKMM1tl.0"I iuttl.l 1 .41t. , ! �00P tP.t a .P+a . � ur��u^�y�• �.4 N�• �,��oP.fWf Itp ?LAID 4C w..a.a%_.nea ro.l a. .oca et,.'.`iALJW '*ICTORIAI,. I ``�.oan.aar e../ea ulrvur I is TH A C7 MW PLAN 4 fliAE CITY OF ITEM: _RANCHO CUCAMO G,11 TITLE: r PLANNING DIVISION C_ r� `� Ex�ii�IT: ...��.��: � �[ �,�■ ,� 4 (tM/.� �li�I,It'S� llt � I � ts��3i RACT 1 � • G _ Ate V (NTA VA L Y S _ k k C i 7 MIWf�ml. _ L n ,r LmY:t'S` "yX ` w r r j mGol � mI f PLANPLAN 1 2870 SO,FT. EI.EYS.M 1D - t i A CITY OF ITEM TITLE: A RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION C � �` EXHIBIT: SCALE: i a4 L • �C + a r� y i f f 0 J h C PLAN 1 2870 SO.FT, EMV&18,1C OF ITEM: _. RANCHO CU A ONGA TITLE: PLANT ,,ING DIVISI0N _'-C 2 � ExHIBIT SCAV��,�: Y � I\ .•�tefmxux.w •,.. '1h I o,1►4j� r � * t , ' �yu��►aili�Tiil�_f � . off l!� ^' tf+li' I tiiti Big 7r �Z ti � ! !� is r s e a - � �liilli t t� i1�I1� ' IfW_1 iC�, ■ f__u��lli �anrim � A. ff � Metr�•reS� �;. `` �� + �Ul r � t, 70 0 5-24, 8��RG Aaenda� _ _ _.. gg� RICO N. ...�I m�t0 " t R A f I,- :�N 1'!ICJ �' V��L'f� 4'�_ •U. �'' ►lrBi. ,a' _�� ;�CE ASS w t�� 1■ spa" � ♦/ .• ,. a v � i a �:. �►;: y: y Et •` `_ gel® � r�T'R �� ,,�Y�ls w it'd * i l 'h aoec>>i>oa>e sii'a r A OLIV �il 16,11"I'll"p t 7RESB' W�NORowSi _ IH ROW PASS O i--. � �— S a iAS7ER Pl N }i PRESERYEDIv�I ORON� -�_� ' � � 1°a \'fie•�. \ _� �.__..._.� fRESERVED�] OPEN SPACEjj' rr %j O n000 r."PawEE osRKI.s�Acl' i1i;�9P ys '�'.,f t ! I 1 I ILL• / 1 { ",GH S ' CNO ��666 ��I• / 1 1 f ��I; USERVED 10 ye s ✓ �T•. 1 '� ` L— 11 ''y1 W0110W PASEO 1 e f.PRESER _L... _ r t°PENa�.` ` "_ �� ti,, , to`�r �+�"ems`----••! 1, 1- J• _,��-' l"' !<]N`i7 { � OPEri:SPACE, `./•' . s6 �`� of NORTt CrrY OF v RANCHO CLVA t�GA TM_ f City of Tree Removal ermPf' ft i uca o Gad fe89Gi$1€a'LOP l:N r._ Ordinance No.276,pertaining to the preservation of frees on private property,requires that no person r� remove or relocate any w4.idy plants In excess of fifteen(15)feet in height and having a single trunk i circumference of fifteen(15) inches or more and multi-trunks having a circumference of thirty(30) inches or more(measured twenty-four(24)inches from ground level),with-it first obtaining a Tree Rerioval Permit from the City. Z ••Tt3 P,l 'C•rtfl lt€�Lr i lf, 1i1.;.. Rk�!'T am: 11.'� ,- ``- .;;.c: ',• F `=, I LOCATION OF SUBJECT SITE.. TRACT 13566 {.ZEST PROPERTY LINECL � J NAME,ADDRESS,TELEPHONE OF APPLICANT tAND(E ANI ESIGN GROIIP 230 Ne_p_wnor t Qgpter Drive LUNAME,ADDRESS,TELEPHONE OF PROPERTY OWNER(it other than applicant)* THE CARYN COMPANY 2 P.Q. pox+216. South Laguna. CA 92677_Q91(42g,54241. CL EXISTING WINDROW 0 REASONS FOR REMOVAL(attach necessary sheets); TREES AND TREF STAMPS f LU PROPOSED FOR RFMI]VAf T( ACCOMMODATE CHANGE IN GRADE, SEE EXHIBIT 'ni ATTAGI�PO- PROPOSED METHOD OF REMOVAL TRt FS 7tT RF CAWN i10WN AND STIiMPS RFMDV.PD APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: RATE: . ADDITIONAL Ff 0 This application shalt include a plotf plan indicating location of all trees to be removed and retak ed. The species,number,and size of the trees to be removed shall be so designated.If a tree Is diseF sed, LL LL then a wriften statement from a licensed arborist stating the nature of the disease shall be required. ►" ACTIOK ` Bert 'iap�lEcst�iiittt s`eii ov�thi3cr3tarEgn#te're "rseae. Z. .. LU ❑ APPROVED DENIED tSENIED By: Reasons; L� Date; Notification of application shall be given to property owners within a three hundred foot radius ten days ,1L prior to approval.If no appeals are received,then the permit shall become effective ten(10)days from the W date of action.This approved tree removal permit is valid for 90 days from the date of final map recordAmp or building permit Issuance,whichever comes first.Should applicant fall to remove the trees within tMW day period,a new permit shall be required,unless an extension is requested fourten(14)days prior to the expiration of the permit. RESOLUTION Nu. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,ANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR 75 OF 1541 ,INGtE FAMIL` HOMES IN TRACT NO. 13566 LOCATED SOUTH OF ,-aTREET, EAST OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD IN THE LOW/DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWEL, TNG UNITS PEk' ACRE) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF; APN 226-111-02. A. Recitals. 'I) Century American has filed ant application for the Design Review of Tract tto. Tract No. 13566 as described in) the title of this Resolrtion. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as 'the _i application". (ii) on May 24, 1989,; the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonaa held a, meeting to consider the application> (III) All legal prerequisites to the adoption'of this; Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamr:,ga as follows: 1. This Comoission hereby specifically finds that all of the fz.ts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.' 2. - Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 24,"1989, Inluding written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: A. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and B. That the proposed design is in accord with the objec tine of the DPvelopwnt. Code and the purpos of the district in which the site is located; and C. That the proposed deriga is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Deveiopment Code; and D. That the proposed destet, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 13566 - CENTURY AMCRICAN May 24,`1g89 Page 2 3 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning 1) The euca�Iyptus trees .tq be removed shall be replaced along the a.,ci re western property boundary in accord-,.e with the provisions of the Etiwanda Sper,,;wic Plan with 5 gallon sizr Eucalyptus <Maculaia trees spaced 8 feet on center. Landscape and irrigation plans along the western boundary shall be approved by the City Planner prior, to issuance of building per,71its. 2) The c,,ff-site slope easzment ajacent to, the western property Line shall be plan*,ee-" for erosion control and a temporary ?;4rigation, system shall be maintained for a period of at least 6 months by the developer, consistent with the standard requirement for slope planting for custom lot subdivisions. A' landscape and irrigation plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of any permits. 3) Final design of the entry portals and perimeter 1,011s shall be consistent with those approved for the previous Design Review application and shall be subject to approval by the City Planner &;City Engineer, prior to issuance of building permits. 4) A permanent decorative wall treatment shall be :utilized along the western property line unless a map has been approved on the adjacent property at the time this project is to be constructed, in which case a wood fence may be utilized, subject to the City Planner's approval. The 'wood fencing snarl then receive a consistent paint o- stain, treatment. Regardless ' of whether a project has been, approved on the adjacent property, the west boundary of Lot. 1 shall receive a decorative block treatment. Cam,; 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 13566 - CENTURY AMERICAN May 24, 1989 Page 3 5) A natural stone shall be used for ahy river. rock veneer. 6) Driv_,vays small not, exceed a width of 16' through the public right-of-Y1ay,` 7) Applicable conditions from Resolutions 0"-126 and 88:114 shall apply. 4, The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. I APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY, 1989, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAuONGA BY: Wiry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Aft Brad Bijller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Coirfaission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, -do hereby certify that the foreg(Ning Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Gancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of.the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of May, 1989, by the following vota-to-wit; OYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: v ji $..a.uou uri�� +ow .'mac qs 'cv C RLa u� (l'}•() Oy O^.My O^YL ALGq+ i 0. ! $y® 8 OI CY !yam ey • 9��V C OC d OYtVJP c.yyY RU U �c gG"il u.>O O O1-c0l"y9^_ 4V CC:L. pppys G.CC O RCYLVY YE 7� OCp A Owe O' R- y C'y� OG�`6 oo�.C.e . p�p o'.c aY HOLY YY*cyCY 6 yy «y Z aGiT�CNV c1z gvn Mg,-�`•'�'a3 ag in q� �o�RQ wY4 ace$N �. ^f YpC.=+So a c oa a ... GV Opv �7.L4N tl� QaM RO^YN C"G!ty RqNYj.V. 2-6 ' 4�N^Y■.. V �pN NY�ONCCO Ui^UO u:pa ` 9C^ ^� up Qy g ^ C u O a3Y. ... .".L`.0 c AGU�YU Z. c {�ILA W. �L QNm.�QYr.� �YY YG. Mu�<Yy� pp� M L p G CO U�YO C C-w wNam. +�Q` OOQYi ^Y�UN■(T cu M 4Yy YUyY.0 CF$TC~ O iY a+1.a^VsY NdY ^ MOB ~ypyL Y"U¢ �W R'wYMY1.H ''[[wLe yay�+nw [[ rrUCC�(J�.1i >cc U -CL•{••iiii Y qq N gy'•� G�VYRO KN� 4COVia. EC 12 Dz; •i y�y o 7\ N x� x� � xI I , .C NQO (� Kp a i�!py c1c L 999 a VIE a�YC w G VQ LQaVY s 0 Cp■-a,+- i 0 Y M L C st 1. �'iu'Jsy's IL 'A' j00001 LR L s_w s� f. �y o O�V Y a Y• d • N 1A f Vl c� 3Z k � I I. I �yN�ZG'Cu$ ua1Y$3�� "s.4.a Isu za o�9 }C8+ o.+4oAy $L'dG ui.:"�atA.�ar aryq ,LY„ L.�Y• �.� I ` � Yw+ 6/yae Y. YMNa �+�D$ --a 9,^.y � ,� ✓;g,��a �'d `75=Uj a■"�~y1 u' E z a1.5 Y yam+ 4 V<Y "na ry$ .'�3'J'e $Z:,Yyur Z. � $�eN.q<. . r� "..► p g pQ '�[�'+ L o.w � _ V�L� ga}�i4w �N3YYy�`w O •1.0 Q^a Y:y�.. hew L. _ ~��4 �/� r.� 9�w "a iNCN WL4eec^ VQfJ YeN tat yw.y wM p, w Ly C ME ix= , �.o O'3 wa 1r. i. �LgO,C wM�ra M ~N�'eN <w=Y4 N—� <~ w y a,o_� alp-'$�� 22�yw-«ti_� w��w '�� °C'rFN'q w3 �• YyC mC HN CNY�yy3 ?.e'$HN 1Y CpwN. f.w�TMi�r�.a�I�® L.�.tL��w+• yyya��.s �g C Asp co C w 9 ■u-" x-.-V p�G +r y 'Y yY ..��j.C �. M rYy..Y.Cry¢*. V f2 r. . Nq q NMglj� -"HA Z.;c s.�ppNp a� ryryP p� 9r O CIM sT ffiM^t� C �aLO M~3MM C 12 Cf cf p,� ,y7 Q9 ys {Y1 ry v'��jr{ ti y� L O�yy` qG AY , y bel� �£t y AO. L<Y O1 a Z w 9 l'9 w W i!M h_�■G■i�N>>x{{a 4{, aqq}.�LT1'.q T H^4 A� Lam.K•.�My<<C� wYY Yki5132 { L N 0�0�iL gpl S LOCpw ET r�r L tea+ `Y Wr 11� Y$ Lw s1 PH, �.N YLt :/�o.NN 1 N ,q L ..� N rag s�M �*r�. ZI as av�g' $ � pf 1M y�� ill a� �8 Vtl•N 3 Z°�►A MArb �C��.. .a Yw~+ N �s$S L e+�ix PQ r MyN 9� a, "axis,, V G L p �/� �� g40 O Cv CC,G 040 C0C M.-q� .9N L Q90 QVN F pp sp— ^ Nye wN Yy .o� �'^ Ofpgi�4ym�{�Y�Yp �'C ~ b¢�L Qlp„CH.^Oy aV�9 C s � w' ,y VO Y�O 4NN.�Op "O�iyU Aq f..� awT p■L I C. LEY ;4 y Lys�.q� O Lu C' ♦Xi bTT =L 9w'd G V Y.. gyQY rQ Y C ^ 'I/�a!�l S �.¢u �Pw' u�' ena! a^ W�Noo+•8 ate°= y�ss d�N �,nEL �� 'ro Hwy L� I «K �3&c 04 as 'y r�$" O"LO Lis r$,30$ Le0OY4;�iy a■`yr t+'r�'- �a N:Lra o��$ � oE ^ TL' � =NV N"v OJyN7 $N �9 Ncy' iy�ya. vLl b:3 4 N1 C+ q�.0 V O r pIL Z z�. ^yam�.. L G'+y 0. ,�� Q Y,� •4. rA Lai�.� oq~� oa 'L w.,^� �!#'� o��Mv��`f'i.�'a 'ya,��wa ,`��!'s• � ay3 ss J�/� y L,4 Iy1.y°'d. NTN� KNi.�. KN .7N0 FN.�. KN yrQ��lY Ni1CI GML:Eii9 C+*� L KV 6ia a AM M lL90 MIS 'O` .00 N r1 GnQpG 6i CD .00 9A� OCR ��P 7L.��' al !ey 1w i1 G iQw GL O w YV-C .03 6 O p Gp i yy 4 Q _ M Mil om�• a��w f �� ..S � �� 3g`E g� ati�� '..��'S j eIZ r 8C Y C p V Y O rV s A Y QM y i C M CIA 91i� P ;NN g E«y Ic S y, � .$ 1cu YLY ��gp M � $.V O.V. VO N �j 7 Y' + �LG`l• C `Liw«. O Liy� g�N AllL� $ LX Y N • tl �i. M � u�!p w tYi •�i ,y Dppcg�° U�gt -.i sr At 5� at$ I�NpY ¢ G.�Q� .�Wryo =Co^ E�E C� '�F F. =y4, dt.. zµ rye. ii 6O UMu H� OU'O �Y qa" Cswy LYV 0. _ ■V Ai D 6�4 T f Y�rw ill p N '' iyyr� TTyy :�E�VV� o_gqa K tJNO K��Y KDN l�A i1J EV �ONwef �Qi C c Wi 4SN M4. �( � j c ��y) C.VCyR ^N'JC Z tNYi.. 9 p. If yL�� Yppy1N Y y■a�: �. w' Y p L uri= �� •.l y. D U u ONl4= u>b} '�� qN C4 Z CL OOy VOa �er�G � .�i v0^� a a�•y+ M'e�V Ny $5 e ty ma p^�y """�' "dig a �m �,,,/ i So° vc� ovu`� yrdw 51bi cj_ rp«=.u-� $ r2 sr w�» .lS V •`CCCf Oa IIU �N Y=q 4y > a 0 NV� �L_+a+^ 4 �'Y \✓ eOgg 3- N�wYA you C!' g'�+s «•' �aYoc°e s 50, ^C 6 ^N tlAr pftt�4.�• Y '•N t��r ^}y�g V t!.9. t}^ �$C(,��y. � _Y` uN�O dr�'0YY. � yYC• •+ ^.Y+Cwr. Yv sA Cw� L O gV. CN. w M�N w H .Y' Y ry }V•A^/ c■a@@Q^��ii�HY p4Y �• � N �aa� •Lw� 6L M at "a'a{M� yNQAQ�Y'i,i¢� Y:"a Q�Q Y D0 '{Y Y t I�rJW Lea gw^Y.a N n 4Yb. b p4Y xI 1 Yl 10 A !i Q �i N by R � x S$ Tq a Ilk Y ui4 4ggrY ,ups .; 8 g. sN' ��C Y~a. !Iry tj Pig 1 1! 46 Nwr . + 4 fig• L{��Ip— Y Y.'ay Y Ne • � 0�. s '� Yg: MYJO� Mu;S IL N� 4Y. Aii q NOM.I, •Y8 t;.k `o iia �• $ $' e� sQa�a NSC d'"$ p Lo AY ' .�' : o.Z � °i1{� .L..$ '� �+� - ~ a3 ice N. a .2 N N II V .. Y 3N a r Y wqfl!a, N L w'� Q i W M•�4 �Y ts"a. N■G■6f y~ ® NYM YOY �y. M�rr. aO �t Oyyo Jp {C�r� MCq Q N W V YQ u�uN6 awpa «M N M� t:zzJ. ^ .UC py p- 7 i.C86. Y� {`■�Y�pp' {Lr� YiO■n�rp■O, hHG J wi N i �.jr� JL�w K I�r4�1w t6�. CV MF -.V a, Wa:7 tlYMH ram. o p is g'$5 N c. + c w onc. cIoyusc va,S r a. ocoa Y 1 e i.. �ipMY 1 �Y c G N J. PONY Y�C tz Y lz ZILS �Ya' N L .Y wpe 4fq� N .C-� +Nr C8 -Z` 7 Y u ■.Q.Nn Off'. OI a IL�C. YY YL^.C1 WN R iyi w:C Lv o �aea �> .C >VM S�_p N ^3O4/.7Mq_C{pL0.g)�:� aU� O��LCO:C . 0 p u uuo� pp u�lVA' o Y ' un su �o -2 c} B ppp y m. b NZ Y r MU 20 y C� N Y sY IC. U i p 3 3.6 Off^ M. o `-ill, iv HIS ' 3 :act ji LM w ! ~ u�� YpC N4e� o E st u 0au q p ; 6 d~U qq0`Mdd�cc YYQ v C yry N p Yy$Yp C a^ �V p C�YY �W �L CV Yli �N y ara^�+nq�KKrg6CA .y~S1'ip Y{Y� Y2 ``•. 'yLC O�VyN 4 11 •' ~ r WNW. r rO. 0 �r.F W N O W Y:i S 0 G4D:J 6� K S � �iiLf K.It Al .1 - CITY OF RANCHO C1JC"1ONGA STAFF REPORT w DATE. May 24, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Plannii,.g Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Plainer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-01 BMTOR i - .t-, -cevelopment of 3 industrial buildings e a ing 22,7W square feet on 1.28 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 81 of the Industrial Area Specific Pl,,nj located at the soua;heast corner of Utica Avenue,and Fulton Court,.:- APN: 209-142-51. L. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIONr A. ion eques e : issuance of a Neg#ive Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning, Rorth - vacant; enera nustrial South - Multi-tenant Industrial; General Industrial East - Single-tenant Industrial; General Industrial West - Multi-tenant Industrial, Vacant, Industrial Park C General Plan Designations: ro ec e—General Industrial North Ceneral Industrial South General Industrial East - General Tndustrial West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The ,prop,, .y is vacant without any significant vege on. The * cN slopes. naturally to the South. The project is Phase 4A of an overall seven-phase development plan which includes acant properties north of the proposal,. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces t of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided C, anu acturing 22,772 17500 46'� -` 47 Il tM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ue-VELOPMENT REVIEW 89-01 - BARTON DEV. May 24,'1989 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. eneral: The proposed project is consistent wi ., previously ap-�r7,le Phases 1 through 4. The proposed use Ys allowed within the General Industrial area and is compatible with the surroundsig projects. The pro;.-t is in compliance with the site development standards of the Industrial Specific Plan and the site design is consistent with previous phases. Following issuance of a Negative Declaration, the City Planner would grant approval subject to conditions recommended by the review committees. B. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design-Kev ew committee Suzanne Chitiea, Peter Tolstoy, Dan Coleman) on April 20, 1989 and May 4, 1989. The Committee made the following recommendations for Conditions of Approval: 1. Ar additional horizontal reveal should be added to the building and screen wall elevations (See Exhibit "C"). 2. The bench in the employee: plaza area should be relocated away from the drive aisle and tables or concrete bollard should be included (See Exhibit "D"). C. Environmental Assessnent Part I and II of the Intiai Study have been completed- and-no significant environmental impacts have been found as a result of the proposed development. III. FACTS FOR FINDINCSS': The proposed use is consistent with the General an and the Industrial Specifi.c Plan. The building design and site plan together- with recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with the Industrial Specific Plan and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that 'Planning Commission issue a Negative Declaration for Development Review 89-01.. Re c ull B d Bul Ci t nne BB:CK: Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan 4`bi bit "C" - Elevations Exhibit "D" Plaza Detail sisals svo aax _- n.-- l7 !� �� ". •fit 3� yy� 03 =uCj Fi CL • 'txt1. �. _.. 31\3a�YJ[l I E. taaol 3oasort 31T,V' S3.ltlt t= �• N OF ITEM: R• ►9� D RANCHO CU AM NG TITLE: PLANNING DlVlSIO D ` 3 EXHIBIT: SCALD r � 1 vi rrr�rr rot a 9•rcx�wraw.� � .k. a�. l t'�'�# , ' ` ti me r•:•:.e rr...,iw rwret _J ••1L Ir Ir01y• , � tic sarraraat ::o.acf.r.ae.rt • iiu(eu•wrw� r �,lrfY OF ITEM; .. ._. ANCHO TEE.. N I G IVI IO � ` `� E RIBIT SCALE:�._.�.. 7��i1�3YRKW.' . VnTa ar � saUM s., y� '• ��: t r�..,a�e' ;` — ` 1 M wommAYOM up �. ''� � �G• `tip:, 4 �`{ ��i=�*�•. j i�+,�{• to"EJVAYX. ansna= (PHASE 4& �6Q.�f1QdK�3 ea:A I ORT I Mai. �s ANC CST"'AMON A TITLI: �`•�:— �� _14 ate`- wt asvuaa wmuarace .�pP�..9 �D a� - •ar�sw wu�a ter... N ORTI CIS' OF ITEM:10 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: SCAL , ai � r ARL Tea�i� i NORTY 'elTY OF ITEM: °o PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALE.�` 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 24, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission kk FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 1 BY: Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 89-03 - - A request o approve a Development ; greement or approx mately 25 acres Consisting of 78 lots at approximately 3.2 dwelling units per acre, located on the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues - APN 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04, and 18. ENVIRON►9ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT - - requesto pre-zone approximate 7 acres o vacantland located at the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues to a density of Low 1 Residential (2-1 dwelling units per acre) APN: 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04, and it. I. ISSUE: Staff is requesting a continuance of the public hearing on eve opment Agreement 89-03 and Develop-tent District Amndment (Pre-Zone) 89-02 scheduled for the May 24th Planning Commission meeting to Junk! 14, 1989 meeting. The purpose of th;s c,:;aj.inuance will be to orovide additional time for staff ord the applicant to review and process the Development Agreement before it is presented to thf public and the Planning Commission. The applicant ogrees additional time is necessary to complete the Development Agreement. 11. RECOVENDATION; Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a continuance for Developwnt Agreement 89-03 and Development District Amendment (Pre-Zone) 89-02. i y itted lan B city lenre "' BB:JG:mlg ITEMS E, & F -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ..z 12ATE: May 24, 1962,. TO: Chairman and Meo',srs of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, F4�sistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND`,TENTATIVE TRACT 13351 - LEWIS residentialsu vrsjon an es gn review o co�"dn omini= on 8 lots and 8 single family lots on 9.07 acres of land in the Medium 'Density Residential District {8-14 dwelling units per-,acre} within the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avenue - APN: 1077-091 34, I. PROJECT STATUS: City staff has recently received notification from the Chaffey Joint Union High School District of school ;capacity concerns. I However, specific information on how this notification wood affect this project is not available at this, time. Staff and the apriicant recommend that this. item be continued until further: information is available. The continuance will allow staff additidnal time to work with the School District to address their concerns. A specific continuance date will be determined at the May 24, 1989 meeting. II. RE'COMM'aNDATION: Staff recommends that thr Mannino r^,mission con r nubs item to a date to be d6ter mi.;= ac -ne day 24, 1989 meting. Res Pally ted, 8ra,&J er City P annex BB:BH:js ITEM G r Lewis Homes Management Corp. 1156 North Mountain.Avenue t P.O.Box 670(Upland,California 91785 . 7141985-0971 FAX:7; 481,-9799 r ° May 18, 1989 t4AY 10 fly! City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91734 Attn: Brad Buller Re: Tract 13351 Co7t- nuance Gentlemen: Because of the Chaffey High School Distria*'s current unwillingness to issue "will. serve".,letters and,,—ur consequent inability to issue Negative Declarations,' please continue our Tract 13351 from the May 24 Planning Commission agenda to iAiat of June 14. If the problem has not been resolved by ..early June, please further continue the item to ,the-,Tune 28 calendar. I'm sure we'll be in more or less constant communication on this issue and will know better where we stand in.a couple weeks. Thanks for your cooperation. Very truly yours, LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP T " 7� m�ompv n Authorized Agent DMT:sd r - C?x Y 4F RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 24, 1989 E TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT .. - An amendment to the landuse aefinition of "Bui g .Maintenance Services" to include snail operation contractors which meet certain criteria. 1. BACKGROUND: At its April 12, 1989 meeting, the Planning Tom—Iss on directed staff to prepare an amendment- to the Industrial Specific Plan (ISP to permit small operation contractors in areas which curr�ntiy permit building maintenance services uses. The Commission determined that small operation contractors were similar to uses described under the Building Maintenance Services land use category and that if they could be different+ated from large operation contractors (which typically have Glx-door storage and operate large construction equipment), they • should be included under this category, The Building Maintenance Services uses are currently permitted in 12 of the 17 subareas of the Industrial Specific Plan. They are not permitted in the Haven Avenue Overlay District. II. ANALYSIS: Based on the Commission's direction and on the desire to m t gate potential problems with allowing contractor uses in Industrial Park Subareas of the Industrial Specific Plan, si:aff has proposed the following text amendment to the definition of Building Maintenance Services, with the amended teAt shown in bold face: Building Maintenance Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited maThtenance and custodial services, window cleaning services, disinfecting and exterminating services, and janitorial services. Small operation contractors miry be included in this category, provided that the contractor has no,outdoor storage of any materials or equipment, no inoperable vehicles or not-motorized trailers, nor any vehicles in excess of 8V in width or 6,000 pounds in gross Wight. i ITEM H PLANNtnnr COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISPA 89-02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCfiMONGA May 24;1989 Page 2 This added text is based on figures specified in another'areo. of the Industrial Specific Plan as well as in the Rancho Groamonga Municipal Code pertaining to tilt;. regulation of parking on public right-of-way and and in residential districts within the City. These figures specifying maximum vehicle width:and weight appear to be a good 'separation point between small pick-up trucks (typically used by small contractors) and the larger, more construction oriented vehicles, The added text: also prohibits outdoor storage or the use or storage of any inoperable vehicles, non-motorized trailers, and offices, etc. III ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this: ; d text amendment. If the Commission and City Concii concur, a (�gative Declaration should be issued. IV:, FACT"' FOR FINDINGS-, The .project is consistent with the Industrial pec Tc 6n arK the General Plan, The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impactse V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a public hearing. VI'II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recornenos thii the Planning Commission consider the options outlined above ;and recommend approval of Environmental Assessment and Industr aI Specific Plan Amendment 89-02 to the`Sity,Council — Res fly itted Br le City Tanner• BB:BH:mlg hii �,ttachmmentsc Exhibit °A" - Staff Report of April 12, 1989 Exhibit "B" -'Planning Commission Minutes of April 12, 1989 Resolution Recommending Approval' Draft Ordinance — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGrL STAFF REPORT DATE: April 12, 1989 197- Z fl TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission i FROM. Brad Buller, City Planner I BY: Brett Horner, Assis-cant Planner SUBJECT: INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECYFIC PLAN - A request to initiate an amendment o the land use regu ations for subarea 7. I. ABSTRACT: The applicant, Ad Malley Management Company, is requrequ—estT g that the Commf%sicn initiate an amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan, S(,�oar.�a 7, to permit b!-14.lding contractor uses. Currently, this use >1i neither permitted nor corditionally permitted within this subarea, which is designated "Industrial Park Staff is seeking 'Crimmission direction on whether to initiate an amendment, and this report is not intended to be a comprehensive analysis of the issue. II. ANALYSIS: The ISP currently has two categories. for building coffin rai Tor uses, which are defined below Building Contractor's Offices and Yards: Activities ypica'— y nc u e offices and s rage of equipment, materials, and vehicles for contractor's 14ho are in the trades involving construction`activities which include, but are not limited to, plumbing, painting, electrical, roofing, carpentry, and other services. Screening of outdoor storage is required as per Section IV, A.G. (Storage Area/Screening). Building Contpactor's Storage Yard: Activities include e maintenance and ou d6or— s-tirage -of large constrtctin)rc equipment_ and outdoor storage of ►arge construction equipment such as earthmoving equipment, cranes, and outdoor storage of building materials in an J unscreened manner. I i The applicant's request (see Exhibit "A") concerns small operation building contractors; such as plumbers, electricians, carpenters, and similar tradesmen. These contractors typical'ry are serf li employed or employ only a few persons, do not utilize heavy equipment, store materials indoor only, and lease a small amount of space (1500 square feet or less). PLANNING COWISSIOV 'AFF REPORT RE: ISP; SUBAREA 7 April 12, 19S9 Page The applicant believes this type of use is different from the contractor use described! in the ISP. Further, the applicant states that these smaller operation contractors are very similar to other permitted uses in Subarea 70 such as custom manufacturing, office, light warehousing, business supply retail sales and services, business support services, and building maintenance services, among others,. � The applicant specifically men' ons the building main;enance services use as being similar to that of the small oneratiW building Contractor. The ISP defines building maintenance services as follows;; Building Maintenance Services: Activities, typically nc u e, out are nor 11mITU to; maintenance and custodial services, with(W:s cleaning services, disinfecting and exterminating services, and: Janitorial services. III. ISSUES: Currently, the ISP does not differentiate between ubuilaln9 contractors which utilize heavy constructioi) equipment and have outdoor storage yards (large operation contractors) and those which do not (small operation contractors). Hence, all contractors fall under one land use category (which may or may not be desirable). Generally, building contractor uses are not compatible with office, light warehousing, research, and retail uses whichhave higher design standards in terms of building architecture. site design, landscaping, etc. Consequently, the ISP excludes building contractor uses from the Haven Avenue Overlay Ofstrict and from subareas, such as Subarea 7, designated as ° ndustrfai Park". Building contractor uses are permitted, or conditionally permitted in most subareas (see Exhibit "C"). It appears from this exhibit that the ISP provides sufficient area in which to locate building contractor uses, regardless of whether the contractor has an outdoor storage yard or uses heavy construction equipment. However, if small operation building contractors do not use heavy equipment or store materials in outdoor storage yards, j they may be compatible in subareas which permit such uses as building maintenance services and tight manufacturing. In this case, the only area which may be of concern is the vehicle uses by the small operation contractor. Frequently, a small operation contractor will use pick-up trucks to travel and transport small building materials between the AWL office and the Job site. PLANNING C"ISSION 7AFF REPOPT RE: ISP, SUBAREA ' April 12, 1989 -0a. ,ge 3 i?owever, soax .of these trucks may be quitc, large, weathered„ and in disrepair from being on the job site. From an aesthetic standpoint, this would tend to negatively impact "Industrial Park" zoned areas. Yet these same types of trucks may ar'so be used by janito ial services, exterminating services, maintenance/custodial services, and other uses defined in the Building Maintenance Services land use category, which is permitted in Subarea 7. IV. OPTIONS, If the Gomissiun believes that the applicant's request:has merit, the following actions could be taken: 1. initiate an ISP amendment to permit or conditionally permit Building Contractor's Offices and Yards in Subarea 7; 2. Esta'olish a new ISP land use category <(through a text amendment) defining a small operator building contractor to contractor without a storage yard or any heavy construction equipment) and permitting or conditionally permitting such uses in Subarea 7 and/or other subareas as the Commission feels is appropriate, 3. Include small operator ,building eontractDrs in the Building Maintenance Services land use definition by rewording its definition through an ISP text amendment; 4. Include all contractors in the existing land use definition by ariending: the text of the ISP aW rewording the land use title to read; "Building Contractor's Office and/OR' Yards", ` S. Not initiate any amendment; or 6. Any other option C'le Commission may deem desirable. V. RECONNERATIOil. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission caosi3br a op ions listed above ah4 direct staff to proceed with the desir 4/course of action, if any is desired. Respectftt ly Submitted, 114 Brad Buller City Planner I BB*BH-ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" Request Letter Exhibit "B" - Subarea 7 Exhibit "C" Map of Area Permitting Contractor Uses ��L.J�LV'3�5i 1V{AlliilGEME9d3' tfarch 6, 1909 City Planning Department c/o Brad Duller P.Q. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 RE: -:Amendment of indusrrial Specific Plan Dear Mr. Duller- The Arrow Business Center is located in.an IP-T land usa zone. This designation restricts general contractors who fall into two categories- Building Contractor's Offices and Yards with screened Storage, and Building Contractor's Storage Yard with ucscreanad storage. The planning department has taken the position that all genesrj contractors are restricted in the IP-7 zone even i%:hay have no outdoes acoragc and j heavy equipment requiraagnts. We are requesting that the d:,ncrtmeat re- consider this position.. The small general contractors who lease spaca in our comer take spneeof 1500 square feet or less. They own one or two pick-up trucks but no heavy construction equipment. Their operations consist of office use and wara- house storage. All construction work and material d0,ivory is dons.at the job sites -not ac their un_ts. 'these small general contractors do not impact on the center any differently than other approved users such as printers or building maintenance services. We would like to initiate whttevor;zocedures are available to us to heva this matter reconsidered. Va truly Yours. � "-":aLLEY 1fAMACElkCi�lSII7T COMPANY hsu ur SLtL l Leasing Managar i cad David Leff 5129' 1.eaa*. t•S,.A'te..PaKv t mv_Sine+Hill 9u'sw CITY POTENTIAL.!NMN N LI 1��YTT OF ��^^rr;T ,�^� A ITEM: SUBAREA 7,OF THE IA MN C O V U CAMON` �Cl TITLE REQUEST LETTER PLAN141�4G DIVISION 1a�I /T� � EXHIBIT: . ---- -77 WAVRM HVIftAY U MTV-GZT foo 4+tCZ 1.oe - i� CIRCULATION TRlOW/ROLRLE ®. 120'R.O.W. Co 0 q vedaalian •••«•• Geeeao3 Caetssela Fite atenaat mo 100'R.O.W.. '*-so* skyeb adaift� ' o._ as,or teaa PLO.W. 0;y Ilt Aeaesa.Pepft RAIL 9ENVItfi�� Ovae'SLaPlJ rH-.+ Eslall" 6r :Ci;Deea PGt0.� _...... Ptop000d = utmi 'RSYI O 000`' t7o0A� i Note;.Petgol dime am kA CCtiM(a7swn am vbm"Ce 09mabRsttlaff:oftq. rm TT"tl pae shown f a Cit to w OAi w to a PM)OCtgd ftw a TL"elct MAy D edIwtea e.ot thm as the ply de.okIm POTENTIAL AMENDVENT TO OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCA ONGA TITLE: SUBAREA 7 PLANNING DIVIS ON EXHIBIT:R.SCALE: ��t�c� a05 .41 , will i DIRECTOR'S REPORTS- 0. INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN - h request to initiate an amendment to the land use regulations ;,cr a, ars.. T; Brett Horner, Assistant: Planner, presented the staff repor Chairman McNiel invited'public comment. David Left, associated with development of Arrow Business Center,stated Mid Valley Management Company was the property man.gemer , company which operates the faciioty for them. He provided pictures of facilities leased to two small general contractors and one small plumbing contractor. !a, stated they had discussed the concept with Brad Buller. He said their typical units were 800 feet and all units have office space with some industrial space. He said they do not rent to welders or cabinetmakers, because their uses would be noisy and dusty. He said their proposed users were genera;7ly not on site except for the offi;e staff.. He ;requested that the use be allowed in the zone without a Conditional Use Permit. Jack Corrigan, BCE Development, original master planners of the business park, stated that when the property was originally developed, provisions wert trade to avoid having contractors storage yards in the area. He stated that when the Arrow Industrial Condominiums were originally built, small general contractors were allowed and there had never been airy problems, {e felt the modification was warranted. He felt the management corporation would police any weathered trucks being stored on-site. Commiso ones Tolstoy asked if the rC&Rs 'restrict outdoor storage at Arrow Industrial Condominiums. Mr. Lcit stated that their leases prohibit outdoor storage. There were no further public comments. I Planning Commission Minutes 19- April l 12, 1989 Commissioner Tolstoy stated he felt the proposed use was acceptable so long as the xirding prohibited outdoor storage and equipment other than trucks or service vehicles. Chairman McWel stated that electrical and plumbing contractors sometimes buy ` old Langendorf panel trucks and haul them to construction sites to store their l+ equipment. fie d4d not want those types of trucks left at the business centers Commissioner Tolstoy suggested the wording should exclude that type of vehicle. Commissioner Blakesley asked if parking of a certa4n juration could be prohibited. Commissioner Chitiea asked who would enforce this provision. Commissioner Tolstoy stated an inoperable truck would constitute outside t storage; and if there was no ray to make a, distinction of the kinds of vehicles that could be parked there, he would be against the Amendment. he felt if there was son. wiay to wont the Amendment to restrict the inoperable panel trucks, he would support the change. Ralph Narison, Deputy City Attorney, stated that City,Code'a>;ready prohibits the storage of Inoperative vehicles at Commercial/Industrial si*As. E Chairman McNiel invited Mr. Corrigan to respond. Mr. Corrigan stated that as City Code ai,eady prohibits the storage of AUL inoperative vehicles, he felt the property owners would da an adequate job of policing. Brad Boller,' City Planner, suggested the Corsmissimn could direct a modiflcRtion if the definition of building maintenance services and could prohibit overnight parking in conjunction with those uses. Chairman McNiel stated that he did not want the City get into a problem with enforcement. Mr. Corrigan stated that WSRs are one of the roughest things to enforce. He felt the quality of the project would be thi detarmin ng factor. He stated that the applicant did not build and sell, they managed the p„aperties, There weee no further public comnents. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to direct staff to initiate an Industrial Specific Alan Amendment to expand the definition of the Building Maintenarre Services category to permit small building contractor uses, Planning Commission '41notes .24- April 12, 1989 qW RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF FINE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. -CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENEMENT 89-02 TO INCLUZE SMALL OPERATION CONTRACTORS WHICH MEET CERTAIN CRITERIA IN THE LAND USE DEFINITION OF "BUILDING MAINTENANCE SERVICES", AND MAKIRG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. WHEREAS, on the 24 day of May, 1989, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Pianning Commission has foend that this amendmen�l-not create a significant adverse effect on the environment and recomnends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on May 24, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1, That pursuant to Section 65650 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends appraval of this amendment. 2. The Planning Commission hereb,,, recommends that the City Council approve this rmendment to the Industrial Specific Plan ,)er the attached Ordinance. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF.MAY, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. FENiel, Chairman ATTEST: rA u er, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Pl>anninj Commission cf the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meting of the Planning Commission held or, the 24th day of May, 1989, by the following vote-to w1t° AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: C(I MMISSIONERSs ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i � � 11 ORDINANCE NO. AN OImINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: CALIFORNIA, AMENE�JNG THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC FLAN TO INCLUDE SMALL OPERATION BUILDING CONTRACTORS WHICH MEET CERTAIN CRITERIA IN THE LAND USE DEFINITION OF "BUILDING MAINTUANCE SERVICES' WHEIti �'4, on the th day of 1989, the City Council held a duly noticed p0lic hearing pursuant to motion 65864 of the California Government Code, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The land use definition of"Building Maintenance Services" is are�c+ to read as fellow,; Building Maintenance Service: Activities typically T,; u e, out are not t limed to. maintenance and custodial, services, windot cleaning services; disinfecting and Exterminating services, and Janitorial services. SmO 1,operation contracimes may be included in this categol�,, provided that the contractor has no f7j, outdoor storage of arLv materials or equipment, no inoperable vehicles or non-motorized trailers, nor any vehicles in excess of 84" in width or 6,000 pounds fr: gross ►:eight. SECTIOPI 2: This Council finds that this amendment will not ` adversely ewe environment and hereby issues a Negative Declaration. f I I 12 t -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Gucwnrot, STAFF REPORT , ' ,- Q , a DATE: May 24, 1989 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City P;anp r BY: Cindy Norris, Associate Planner SUBJECT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT 89-1 - A request to es a s i- travel bureau in a leased space of 2,978 sgaare feet within an existing,office,complex of 4.24 acres of land in the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at 9227 Haven Avenue - APH: 909-411-23 and 24. I I. PROJECT AND_SITr IESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Nan-Construction Conditional use Permiz an ssuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding L&A Use and Zoning: tbrth - Vacant, Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 6 (Haven Overlay) South - Vacant, Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 6, (Haven Overlay) East Vacant, Indestrial Specific Plan, Subarea 6 West - Vacant, industrial Specific Plano, Subarea 6 C. General Plan Dttsignationsr Project Site Industrial Park North Industrial Park South Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West Industrial Park i D. Site Characteristics: The site is a single unit within an existing mu -s ory offire building consisting of two (2) buildings on approximately 4,24 acres, which has been fully improved and landscaped. E. Applicable Regulations: The proposed use is classified as a persona sery ce whic1l is a conditionally permitted use in the Haven Overlay of the Industrial Specific Plan. TTEhI I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89-15 UNIGLOBF REGENCY TRAVEL Mast 24, 198 Page 2 LI. ANALYSIS; A. GeneYral< The travel agency will be occupying a0peoximately 2 rf—square feet of the Phase 11 three story office building whic'n has a total square foot;lge of 47489 square feet. (Wiibit 6). ,, The business will operate from 8 Ate to 5 P% Monday through Friday and will serve as a corporate headquarters, clerical operations, and base for the sates of travel services. The proposed use is compatible, ip the nature of their operations, with existing on site uses, B. Parking'Calculations 9W1 it aye« Number of Number of liable Parking; Spaces Spaces Sq. Ft. Suite Tenant Ratio Required Provided 5,800 101 Independence Sank 1/250 843 120 CommunIco 1/250 1,674 140 yommonwealth Mortgage 1/250 1,247 150 Mayflow*r-0ayoun. 1/250 2,013 160 Rancho Dental Center 1/200 1,338 1s0 Countrywide Funding 1/250' 1,319 210 Robertson Properties 1/260 2,564 220 Pitassi-Dalmau 1/250 6,467 230 Prudential Insurance Office Manager 1/250 662 240 Portamedic 1/250 771 250 Larry KuhirAn, Atty. 1/250 939 r 260 Boyle-Midway 1/260 _ 476 270 Robert Burden Atty. 1/260 1,794 280 Inter-Tel/TCI Industries Anaheim Office 11250 26,887 1,435 Tenant Area Vacant 11250 3,467 Other Common Area 1%250 31,789 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89-15 - UNIGLOBE REGENCY TRA7EL May 24 "1989 Page 3 9227 Haven Number of Number of Usable Parking Spc.6b, Spaces Sq. Ft. Suite Tenant Ratio Required Providei_ 2,978 120 Uniglobe Regency Travel 1/250 2,263 130 Huntington Realty 1/250 833 210 El Sol 1/250 765 220 The Gem Connection 1/250 1,436 250 Spec Suite 8,275 30,581 Other Tenant Area Vacant 1/250 6,556 Other Commo6"Area 1/250 45,412 77,201 Total from Both Buildings 311 319 C. Environmental Assessment: Based upon review of Part I on the ntial Stuay an comp a ion of Part II of the Environmental Checklist, Staff has found no significant environmental impacts as a result of this proposal, III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and DevetopmentCode. The project will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, subdivision map and conceptual grading plan, together with the conditions of approval, are in compliance with the applicable j provisions of the Development. Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a pub';ic hearing and notices were sent to property owners within 300 filet of the project site, Y. RECMMDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 89-15 through adoption of the attached Resolution with, Conditions and issue a Negative Declaration. ,r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RESORT CUP 89-15 - UNIGLOBE RECENCY TRAVEL lVxy 24, 1989 P,..� 4 1p Res by s ed 8 'd 9u er Cit nner 88:CNtsp Attachments: Applicant Letter' Exhibit A f-.Site Utilization Exhibit "B" "I to Plan ,r Exhibit "C" 'Floor Plans Resolution of Approval with Conditions Adft �J I i ji surrc.lw 29G010HRITML.4STR££T COSTA F1ESA.CA 92526 (7i4�751•�tlMt ,. April 18, 1989 Mr. Steve Hayes Assistant Planner CITY OF RANCHO CCicaMONGA Community Development Departmen'- Planning Division P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA '91730 RE: Independence Corporate Centre, Phase IX Uniglobe Regency Travel Corporation Dear Mr. Hayes, Mr. Alain Dalmau of Pitassi-Dalmau Architects has asked me to outline for you the intended use of our building by Uniglobe. Regency Travel (Uniglobe) , owned and operated ay Jim T,oberts. Uniglobe is an independently owned business, "oporating from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, and as such, their current quarters serves as both a corporate headquarters, clerical operations, and base for the sales of travel services. Uniglobe moved to Rancho Cucamonga from Upland because most of their business was coming from the Haven Avenue corridor. The majority of their outside sales activity is directed at corporate customers. This business is mostly conducted over the telephone, through the mail and using computerized terminals hooked up with a variety of national reservation syr�tems. There is very little interaction with the public within I:3ependence Corporate Centre. The number of employees on the largest shift is eight or nine persons. Wit1p•tae exception rf the President and two marketing personne, � all other em..iloyees are call-in computer reservation terra tiil operators. The reasons for reques, "-ng CUP atthis location is based on Uniglobe's desire to be le _-ad amongst the corporate business travelers on Haven Avenue. Unigllobe sees the Haven Corridor as the corporate office cen er of the Inland Empire West. Carle Lau'hlin` President' CJM/tdb 1 1 / 1 _ 1 1 1 .-; _. 1 1 M7 'Rom 1 / D 1 / ' l.. mu 1. � l NORTH � I RANCHO CUCAMON A. TITLE: J1.14 PLANNING, DIVISION m EXHIBIT -SCALE:- r 4. 1 4 4 No �. wow 9cfi:01 IIDGDEPeMTEP TP[tt.l•.7OK�Lf. 9 STONY OMM OLDO o T� . G• `� 1{� T..wnt.cok wtrtnrtMT.Ar M 2 STORY Opnee •`I' OlbO 1 ry a I 1 T f. _ eellweTuil..TYr. .,y KooE taltEn. NORTE ATY_ OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAM N A TITLE: � PLANNING DID SION �i � EXHIBIT:-&-SCALE: ...._. ' a4 Poor Wrnrn .Mrs St*,. Lrep,0moODO Lot... tirc..lbn- t V �11+7y�gHs. •t.,)a contosm . + "ftwd.M ACC—t-MO S.aFti-lot NWRlE �,PITY OF ITEM: j RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION O� idE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSYON APPROVING CP4ITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-15 FOR UNIGLOBE REGENCY TRAVEL, LOCATED AT 922 HAVEN AMMUE IN THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-411-23 & 24. A. Recitals. ( ) Uniglobe Regency Travel has filed an application, rar the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 89-15 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as 'the application". (ii) On the 24th of May, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly n.1ticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date . (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution I have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is bpr ft found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of +,he City of Rancho Cucataenga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts j set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. J i 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 244, 1989 including written and oral staff reports, together wit'% public testimony, this CoAmis-ton hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 9227 maven Avenue witb. a street fronta94. of 417 feet along Haven and 349 feet ainng Gth Street And is presently improved; (b) The properties to the north, sou-, east and west of the subject site are within the Indust.iial Specific Plan, Subarea G proposed use. (c) That there is adequate parking available to accommodate the j PLANNING COK41SSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 89 15 - UNIGLOBE REGENCY TRAVEL Macy 24, -1989 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comnissiun during the alloae-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings rf facts set forur in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows; (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, i._e objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the d4strict I .,vtich the si is located. (b) That the proposed use, together whir the conditions applicable thereto, will not be J detrimental -to the public health, safety, or welfare, or: 'aterially injurious to properties or improV,%meats in the vicini ;l. (c) rMat ft, proposed use complies With each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Thi's. Commission hereby finds and t:.rtifies that the project has been reviewed and considered to compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of I970 and, rurther, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration,' S. Bask, upon the findings and conclusions set forth In paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 ab•::.e, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Condition,, attacai4 hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (a) Any modification,,expar„pion, or other change in operation will require a revision to the Conditional Use permit; (b) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Industrial Specific Plan and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of occupancy; (c) nli signage propos✓�d for this Conditional Use Permit shall be designed in aceardance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the planning Division prior to installation; (d) If thy: operation of this Conditional Use Permit causes adverse effects to neighboring businesses, the Conditional Use Permit. shall be brought before the Planning Commission for their review and possible termination of the use, (e) Plans shall be submitted to and approved by the foothill Fire Department and Building and Safety Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. f f' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION .NO. CUP 89-15 - UNIGLOBE REGENCY TRAYF?�s. May e24, 1983 AEL r 6. The Secretary to this Commission: shall certify to the adoption i of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED IRIS 24t1i DAY OF MAY, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF 14E t-M- OF RPICBO CUCWGA BY- Larry T. WHiel,:GKOrman ATTEST: Brad Buller, ;e"` I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly .*nd regularly introduced, passed', and adopted by the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of May, 2989, by the fol'icWng vgte-to-wjt: AYES: COMMISSIONEP.S; NOES COMISSIDWERS. ASSENT. COMMISSIONERS CIrl OF RANCHO CUC Md0NGA STAFF REPORT , ' t �a O f r y z DATE:. May 24, 1989 UL —�' 1977 TO: Chairman and Memtars of the Planning Commission j FROM: Brad. Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Asslstant Plae�ta• SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MODIFI:ATION TO CONDITIONAL - A request o expand an existing square oo c u,'ch by 2,285 square feet within on existinW,industrial park on 20.7 acres of land in the G:eieral Industrial District (Subarea 3), located at j 9521-A Business Center Drive - APN: 209-021-39: f I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Review of a Conditional Use Permit for j Ask cc urd 4xpFi` an`sion TAi an existing industrial park. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or - single Fami ly clential Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Multi-Tenant Industrial; General Industrial District (Subarea 3) Ea3t Multi-Tenant Industrial; General Industrial District . (Subarea 3) West - Vacant, Industrial-Manufacturing; Gen,.ral Industrial District (Subz.r ea 3) C. General Plan Designations: ro ec e- GeneraTIndustrial Borth - L(,w Residential South - Genera's industrial East General Industrial West - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The proposed use is located within an ex s -ng multi-M-affit industrial complex consisting of 20 buildings on approximately PPraximately 20.7 arras. � E. 'Applicable Regulations: The Industrial Area Specific Plan permi ts church =uses within *the General Industrial .District (Subarea 3), subject to a Conditional Use Permit. ITEM J PLANNING C©MISSIUN STAFF REPORT CUP 87-14'-'NEW HOPE CHURCH May 24,"1989 Page 2 1I. ANALYSIS: A. General: New Hope Church currently occupies approximately 772O square feet within Building 9, which has a total lease space of 1Z,960 square feet (see Exhibit "C"). The applicant's proposal is an expansion and reorganization of the ' church's space and not an increase of services provided by the ' church. The proposal includes an ezg,-vsion to the auditorium to accommodate a growth in attendance,. This expansion of the auditorium will occupy that tartion of the existing facility currently being used as the children's ministry area,, T}Y propased expansion into an adjacent tenant suite will be for the relocation of the existing children's ministry area, r B. Compatibility: Tenant uses immediately adjacent to tha church acf" iTy in"Buildings 8f 9, and 10 include manufactuOng, storage and distribution, and office uses, whose primary working hours are fro•1r, 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. since the applicant Is an existing use and to staff's knowledge n4 current problems exist, then the proposed expansion should not present a conflict. C. Parking: The project site was designed and developed az a C+mu - anant Industrial project with a total of 252,225 square feet of tenant space, X total of 855 parking spaces were provided at a 'ratio of one (1) parking space per each 295 square feet of tenant space. 0uri.ig regular business hours, the applicant may utilize up to 32 parking spaces based on a leased space of 9,486 :square feet. For religious assembly and group activities a total of 113 parking spaces will be regal red based on a sanctuary area of 3,960 square feet and a pzrkfng ratio of one (1) parking space for each 35 square feet within the main auditorium. Finally, because adjacent tenants -do not have evening or, weekend hours, staff does not anticipate a conflict in the availability of parking spaces. 0. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Init4l Study, has een comp t e y the Apia icant. Staff has cs letec�- Part II of the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. PLANNING C0-14ISSiON STAFF REPORT CUP 87-14 - NEW HOPE CHURCH May 241989 Page 3 _ III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS, In irder to approve the Conditional Use Permit, the CommIsslon would need to make the following findings: 1. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectiv6s of the Developmmgnt Code; and tW purposes of the Industrial Arec Specific Plan subarea in which the site is' located. 2. That the ,proposed use will not be detrimental to the public hea?ti+, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties �r improvements in the vicinity. < 3. .That the: proposed use complies with each cif the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific P1aa. c III IV. CORRESPONDENCE. This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent all property owners within 300 feet_,gf the pro$,ect site. V. RECOMENDATION: Staff reco!ss Inds that the Commissiton hold a p arn-g on this item. If, after considering public comments, the required findings can be made, adoption of the attached Resolution of Apprwal would be appropriate. RespeTlly /se/bilg,", Y Bra - City ner BB:TG:js Attachments; Exr"bit "A" Letter from Applicant +'exhi bit "G" Sttetion PIart P Exhibit "D" _ Existing Floor Plan ., K ExM bi t "E" Proposed F1 aor Plan Resolution of Approval April 27, 1989 Ray.Byron Spradlin Senior Pastor City rf Ranch, Cucamonga Box $01 ?rancho Cucamonga, CA 91134 RE; Amendment to txisttng Conditional, Use Permit {Resolution 87-63, April 22, 1987, for Auditorium Expansion, Suite A, Juilding 9, 9521 Business Center Drives + The following is an update on the space use of New Hope Community Church, 9521A I Business Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, 945-2596s Puture Expansion Plans f New Hope Church desires to eipand its auditorium size to accommodate the attendance !� growth of its Sunday 9:30 a.m. service (average attendance January-April, 1989, 113 adults, approximately 60 families). This service is approximately ttra•"times f larger than the other two worship services New Hope offers. ' WX Desired Expansion Present auditorium area is 2,21% sq. ft. in the center, of 9521 Husines9 Center Drive. New Hope Church desires to remove the western wail of the auditorium (a glass wall and non+-bearing partiticia) to open up intq t�je adjacent 1,7$0 sq, ft. area of 9521A Business Center Drive, presently being us•pd 4a a children's minintry area. p,ksi.red Timing of Rxpunsitas Construction dyrtaq duos and a7uly 1989 for full use to begin the weekend of August 11 13, Projected Growta,After 8zpaAding Audit~orium,'rpace (Based on 1987 $Bd 19811 growth rate .Eor_cite t)-30 a.m. Sunday sEr4ice) Average Attendance Spring '89 Ipresent) 113 Projecting a 358 Annual Grow£h Rate Fall 19a9 153 - Fail 1990 207 - Fall, 1991 279 P.O.Box 1002 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 9173,4-MZ (71'4))94S-2596 6 City,of Rancho Cucamonga. - page 2 4-27-89 Alk Auditori= square Footage At present 2,255 sq. ft (including aisles, sound booth and platform area -- see attache&-zeating diagram No. 1)+ New expanded auditorium 3,960 sq. ft. (including sound booth, aisles and platform area -- 1,672 ,sq. ft. of seating-,area, diagram 11o._2).` Parking Spaces 2,vailable Within 75 paces 108'spacea Within 100 races (including street parking) approximately 191 spaces What is New Hope ChwVb doing for additional children's ministzy area3 Leasing 2,285 sq. ft. adjacent, Suite B, 9521 Business Center Drive -- see Nets Bope Church CUP amendment request letter dated April 19, 1989 which specifically focuses on the requests related to 9521E Business Center Drive details, also included as part of this CUP amendment request. Thank you very much, _sincerely, r^� Sara jane!Allen office Manager sja ID I I { .40, ROUTE�� - 2,Ir 519.Y C PaLI Por.2 :n a� Par.3 44 Pans 2n4 f 1.4 # { i zrcicos 2 + � 9.23 z4 ,�f 206 K.Wt. y� W c.c NORTH ITEM 3ANCHO MANNING- LZ. �r I NNING DIV'ISIo�y'._ SCALD: rl !till 1011 r !I t •il 1. _ I al Ll e .. till Il +t III lir J`l '� '..s...i 1 'i j11I((iillt �)Llltftltt f(tt(�,.,) — itt •..... it t= ( _ _ t ( :: ! M tn 17 TT i as J i I L Ty OF NCHO t,(t►ttntttt,rttl� u- R CUCAMONGA Tim . PLANNING DIVISION Z -Ie� � All gas ? 1 bTyp=CU��^ 95rb ivairisA �.;,, 08 PAN 6T ' ' 4 rasa# - to ,` � �suR�.•poara�. � NORTH CITY OF 9:14 MMW*- RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: � �� -1. PLANNING DIVISION �� ' EXHIBIT: SCALE: . a J �`l IL ai �Ila f its% ` * 6�Q 3 'A 3+ NN m f T_ • t: u. yj It cc et L 4 cr '� 5;C v y 2 w r q n; G u� ITY OF ITEM: + g W J1 � �I J l g Q Q Q r� a _ cc vi Ll- J W Id 'cc 1 •dam. . -- a ._ •-� � } a ' I� a 1l �!' !"Y�l'L� aa,3�� .�+�MI Tt n:"'r i`a •r i N Q Wot . OF ITEM: ^��" I 61-14 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'TITLE. _PIANNING I'tTISION - ` 1 EXHIB;T: SCALE:a '°"' At 11 low ou 2 lw 01 r u Lt/VT.` iS/1aGd AA�EIC � r y'. I 1 i I CITY OF rrjem b _ 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TME.4W., PLANNING DIVISION 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C6MMISSION OF THE CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE `MODIFILATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-14, THE REQUEST TO EXPAND AN EXISTING 7,2000 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH BY ;?,285 SQUARE FEET WITHIN AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL"PARX LOCA14"D AT 9521-A BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT 'THEREOF APN: 209-021-39, A. Recitals. (i) On April 27, 1967, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 87-63, thereby approving, subject to specified conditions, Conditional Use Permit No. 87-14 which provides for locating a church within the General Industrial District (Subarea 3). 0i) New issuance of the difi lion to Conditional Use Permit Community Church has fileO. a No.application-74 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this. Resolution, the subject i, Conditional Use permit request is referred to as "the application". (iii) On the 24th of May, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho CucamonCa conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the applicati:.= art► aid concluded said-6tearing on that date. (iv) A11 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Re.ol uti on. NOW, THEREFrjV, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission os the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of -the facts set forth in the Re-itals, Part A, of this Resolution are 'tr.-e and correct. 2. ' Based mpon subst-itial evidence presented vo this Commission during the e:f;ae-referenced public hearing on May 24, 1989 including —itten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application eortetrplates an expansion of 2,285 square feet to an existing 7,200 square foot church facility located at 9521-A Business Center Drive, within a fully developed industrial site; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is residential, the property to the south of that site consists of industrial buildings, the property to the east consists of industrial buildings, the property to the west is vacant. �� 13 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 87-14 NEW HOPE CHURCH May 24,-1989 Page; 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and coelcl odes as follow:;: (a) That the proposed use Is in accord with the General Plan,_.the objectives of the bavelopment Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable ,:hereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, orl materially filiurious to properties or improvements in the vi; inity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and co,isi-dered in compYiancQ with the Californ.a Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Cowrission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the applicaticn subject to each and every condition set forth below. 1). Any modification, expansion, or other change in operation, including day care, will require a revision to the Conditional Use Permit. (2) Approval of this request 6hail not waive compliance with all sections of the Industrial Specific Plan, all other applicable City Ordinances and any community or specific plans in effect at i the time of occupancy. (3) All signage proposed for this Conditional Use aermit shall be desiggntd in conformance with the City's Si^a Ordinance and shall require review cnd approval by the Plsnntr%j Division prior to installation. f If the operation of this Conditional Use Permit causes adverse effects to neighboring businesses, the Conditicnali Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible termination of the use. �. (5) Plans shall be suhflitted to and approved by the Foothill Fire Department and Building and Safety Division for their review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits,' The p'!�y) shall indicate: i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUPION NU. CUP 87-14 - NEW HOPE CHURCH May 24,-1989' Page 3 A. , A seating diagram for the sanctuary with the type of seating ii`ustr<sted. B. The proposed use for each room, including ages of ^hil'dretr using each room. (6) The building shall not be occupied, except for church office activity, until completion of all improvements required by Building and Fire Codes to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division and-Foothill Fire Protection District. Further, the building may be used for religious assembly and other large group (60+ persons) acti•vitier 'on Saturdays and Sundays and after 6:30 p.m. on weeknights. e (7) Preschools or schc=: are not allowed by this..permit however, it this shall.not precjude nurser%,; ' or Sunday S&hool during the hours of religious or �iroup assembly. 6. The Secretary to this Co+ziission shall certify to the adopti-on of this Resolutlon, i APPROY'D AND ADOPTED 187S 24TH JAY OF MAY 1989. 9 PLANNING COMMISSEON OF THE CITY OF RAXHO CUCAMONGA i BY: arty "1~E�T;' a rman ATTEST: braHui ter, _Secm-Fary i, Brad Bull3r, Secretary of the Planning C6*lssiin of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly fi troducAd, passed, algid -adopted by;the inning Conmission of the City of Rancho Cucz;meonga, at z regular meeting of the Planning Covission held on tha 24th day of y 1989, 'by 'the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: J NOES; C"ISSIGNERS: I ABSENT: COMRISSIONCRS; i i i -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 24, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant:Planner,. SUBJECT: HOME OC�,JPATIQN P_FNIT.T 8°�185 - DOi.AN - An appeal_ of ` staff s ec s on o deny a Home Occupation Pe•fmit for a multi-tract recording studio located irk, the Low Density Residential Oistrizt (2-4 dwelling units, per acre) at 9292 Arrow Route APN: 208-•35149, `I 1. ABSTRACT: At 0.0 May 10, 1989 .Planning Coi,;Mssion meeti,ig staff was-directed to prepare a Resolution of Approval for dome � OccupWnn Permit ',9-1$5. During the meeting the Planning Commission discussed the issues of noise and the ;number of clients visiting the- dwelling, The attached Resolution of Approval Ak addres-ses those issues and was based on publiv,•->:estimony dnd. Convaission -.omments.' Also attache is the ResoluVI'6 of Denial presanted with the past Staff Report: '`fIf . I Res t ry ted, Br B r .city annex BB:CS:•mlg Attachments: Resolution of,Approval HOP;89-185 Resob ti on of Beni al = HOP 89•-185 l }ti= _ au ITEM K RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COM+9ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 89-185 FOR A MULTI-TRACK RECORDING STUDIO LOCATED AT 9292 ARROW ROUTE IN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, (2-4 DWELLING UNITS- PER ACRE) APN: 208-361-19, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (I) Michael Dolan has filed an application for the issuance of the Home Occupation Permit No. 89-185 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 10th d4y of May, 1989,:and cgnt'.aued on May 24, 1989, the Planning Commission of t+he City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appiicati n and concluded said hearing on that da to. (iii) i`.11 legal prerequisites to the ador0on of t4. Resolution have occurred. B. Resolu*ion. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found', determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the farts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution ar; true and corr--ct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence preu-ited to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing or, May 10, 1989 and continued on May 24, 1989, including reritten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows N The application applies to p operty located ,;v 9292 Arrow Rate with a•. street frontage of 65 feet and lot depth of 120 feet and is presently improved with a 1,300 square foot single family residence; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is single family res'dentiai, the property to the south of that site consists of industrial building, the property to the east is single family re3identiai, and the pronert�f to the west is single family residential- and (c) The application for the Home Occupation Permit contemplates a 200 square foot foulti-track recording studio, including 8-track and 2-track recorders, aiV.lifier, keyboards and other musical inst:rummnts, and 75 Ott speaxers. Further, the application contewplatr:s approximately one ind;viduai recording customer per day betueem,the hours of 12:00 n-in and°9:00 P.M. PLANNING C34MiSSION RESOLUTION NO, HOP 89-185 - DOLAN May 24, 1989 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon; the ,specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby findsand oncluu s as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the !general Plan, the oLjsctives of the Development ^ode, ar'ai the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (b) That the propobad use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the pt,rpeses of the district in which the site is located; and ic) That tt,i proposed-u a is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Codo; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially. injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity", and 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, anri 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. (a) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any or all sections of the Development rode and all other City Ordinances. (b) Operating hours shall be limlited to 1200 noon to 9:00 p.m. (c) Clients shall be limib:d to no more than 5 at any given time and only two groap sessions of 2 to 5 persons per day. (d) If the operation of the facility caus:•s adverse effects upon adjacent, residences, including but not limited to noise, the home Occupation Pefmit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible termination of the use. e The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPRUYED AND ADOPT EU THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY, 1989. PLANNING COWISUON OF 111E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T. PtNiel, UaIrman t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. HOP_89-185 - DOLX4 May 24,'1989 Page 3 f ATTEST: Brad Buller, ecre ram" 171 I, Brad 'Bulle", Secretaryof the lAnni -Come s P ng i Sion of the City of Rancha__ Cucamonga, do Ine'eby certify that the foregoirg 'Resolution,-ya's duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comp fission of the City.-)f Rancho Cucamonga, at a reguya, meeting of the Planning Lammission held on the 24th day of May, 1989, by the. .•olloaing vo, ,z.-to-wit: AYES: COR+,IISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT., COMMISSIONERS: I r 't AWk RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISS.ICN OF THE CITY OF RANr,40 CUCAMONGA, CALIFnRNIA, DEWNING HOKS (OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 89.185 FOR A lV_TI-TRACK RECOIGI NG STUDIO LOCATED AT 9292 ARROW ROUTE IN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (?-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) - APN: 208-361-19, AND MAKi :I FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERZCF. A. Recitals. ;i) Michael Dolan has filed an application for the issuance of the Home Occupation Permit No. 89-18-S as described in the title of this Resolution, Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditiosial Use Permit request is referred to as. "the applicaticn". Hi) On the 10th day of E1?y, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga candtcted a duly no;.+ced public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to May 24, 19.6% (iii) All legal prereq�.tisitin, to the Sdopt"on a Is Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the, Planning Commission of the City of Rar..ho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts. set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this :Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented w this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows (a) The application applies to property located at 9292 Arrow Route with a street `,ronta9e of 65 feet and lot depth of 120 feel: and is presently i improved with a 1,30r! square foot single family residence;. end I (b) The ptroperCy ut the north of t9e subject site is sing a family l residential, the property to the south of that site consists of industrial building, the property to the east is single family residential, and the property to the west is single family.re.�idertial; and (c) The application for Vie Home Occupation Permit cuntemplates a 200 square foot multi.-track recording studio, including 8-tract, and 2-track I recorders, amplifier, keyboard, and other musical instruments, and 75 watt speakers. Further, the application contemplates approximately one individual recording r.ustomer per day between, the hours of 12:00 noon and 9:00 p.m. P PLA.YNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. HOP 89-186 DOLAN May 24,.1989 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence pref-ited to tktis Comnissien during the above-referenced ,public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set fo;th in paragraphs I and 2 above, this £omnissiwi hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is not in accord with. the General Plan, the objectives of the Development-Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (b) That the proposed use will be detrimental to the public health safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvensentr % the vicinitl; anG (c) Than the proposed use does not comply, with each of the applicable provisiras of the Development Code, and (d) That the proposed use is inconsistent with the intent of the following mandatory ccnditions of operation for home occupations, as set in forth ir: Section 17.04c060 of the Rancho Cur+monga Municipal Code. 1) That customers or clientele will be visiting the dwelling. 2) That persons other than family members will be involved in the activity. 3)• That increased traffic to the residence and parking will cause visible evidence of the activity, 4) 'that equipment and processes will be used that will create noise or vibration. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission r=reby denies the application, 5. The Secretary to this Comnission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED MD ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY, 1989. PLANNIiiG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 4;UCAMONGA- BY: .Larry .. WNiel, Chairman i ATTEST: Brad u et, SecrFOiry PLANNING C"ISSION RESOLUTION NO, HOP 89-185 - COLAW May`24,1989 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning tomnission Pf the City 01;'Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly .introduced, p-<5sed, and adopted by the Planning Goremi-csion of the City of Rancho Cucavnga, at;a regular meeting of the Planning Vommiy'sion held on the 24th day ef"Yuay .190, try the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS,, ABSEN'; C"ISSIONERS: i i is r= 19F9/90 AND 1990/91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGES Supplied under separate cover to the eoilolwing: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cowission ' Brad Buller, City Planner Ralph Hanson, City Atferney Otto Kroutil, Deputy City= Planner'" Russ 1:96501f., City Engineer Jack Lam, City Manager i ITEPT L r J