Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1989/07/12 - Agenda Packet
of 07 0 1! 2, C Ag'60-a �+L � pU A)T6-r � (A G�tiCANt()n,, c'r , '• CITY OF RANC40 CUCAMONGA PLANNING CONMISSUN -GENE 1977 WEDNESDAY JULY 12,1989 7.00 P.m, LIONS PARK OOMMUNM CENTER, 9161 BASE L US RANCHO CIICAKONGA,CALIFORNIA, L Ple*e of AlO&ifee IL Swearing In Betty Weinberger as C*mmissianeae Mayor Dennis;;tout Im Roll Ceii Cwrmissioner Blakesley Caamissikiner*Xlel Cbmissiorler Chitisa Commissioner Tolstoy Conmissiow Iieinberger IV. Announciaments V. ApMval at Minutes Adjourned Msst.tg of June 22,1989 VL -Consent Ca endar The fbllowirg Consent Calendar items are 4=acted to be routine and f norr-controversial. They wilt be acted on by the Commission at one time without disoussiom If anyoAe has concern over any item, it should be rex-owed ford1scusslan. f A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REV1f. 89-a8�-BARTFO<-DUELOPMENT COMPANY-�-Tbo devel4Pm�nt � of 12 industrial buildings totaling 140,28o square feet on 6.95 acres of land In the General Industrial District(Subarea S)of the industrial 5peciile Plan,located on the northeast corner of Btica Avenue and Jersey Boulevard-AN: 209--142-15. B. VACATION OFTHE FRONTAGE ROAD -PLAZA AR LAS BRISAS f A request to: vacate they frontage road on Fa4El►ill Boulevard ioceated at the southwest corner of Foothill.Boulevard a nd Ramona avenue, approxlydatelg 30 feet wide and 544 feet lot'g APN. 2�&OOI:15,Y&,BSc 17. r ex ' J C. VARIANCE 89-01 - LANG - A request to construct•a trellis structure in the front yard, which encroaches sixxfcet into the frcnt.yard sethi 6k at 6465°4asper Street - APN- 1062-821-68. (Continued from June 28,1989'.) VIL Public nears a The 'oliowing items are"public hearings in which concerned'ruiivtdulgIs May voice their opinion of the related project. Please j;aet rea'Vnsed by the Chnirman and address the Commi-ision':Tsy statjii�._" r your rune and address. A!'such opinions Mail be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each pritject. i� ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT ' 13351 LEWIS HOME - A residential subdivision and design review of 118 eondondniums on 5 lots and 8 single family lots on 9.07 acres'of land in the Medium Density"'Residential)Dlstriet.($ 1 i4 dwelling units per ware) within the Terns 'vista Planned, Ccinmunity, located at the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avenue - APN. 1077-091-34. (Continued fro.,,n.June 28,1989.) YEt ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL UWS' PERMIT 89-18 - U LF AND: �.ASONR - request to establish a eontraetor's of fice and yard in an existing.non-egnforming buiiing totaling 6,400 were feet on 0.82 acres of land In,,the Medium' ' High Residential District(14 24 dwelling units per mre),located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of the Southern Pacifig Railroad right-of-wey-APN; 7f02-141-12. F. ENVIRONMENTAL 0ASS1SSS tNT' ANA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89--19-UNIIfER AL AR CAD A request to establish an areede>in a leased sparr4 of 85G squat+�'-"biet within an existing commercial center oft 1.26 scares of land I,% the General Commercial District,,located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Malvern A*inue APN; 209-041-51. y G. VARIANCE W07 WILLT'A M LYON COMPANY- A.request to allow 6 foot high block ways within the sonron-yard setb i.lk area of Etiwanda Avenue; locatej"on the west side of Etiwanda between Pg�line-Ttaaa ate;Right'a�t Avenile=APN. Z2i=-S.3-79<k°au,-Z2•r"'---._. '.__.._ 471-61 thru 66,227-481-66'thru 68,and 22T-491-3&53 thru 56. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14139 AHMANSON-A residential subdivision of 119 single family lots o on 54 acmes of land In the low Density Residential District(24 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Etiwatnds Avenue and 25th Street-APN. 225-082-01, I. AMENDMENT TO THE COND014INIUM CONVERSION ORDINANCE -An amendment to Cha?ter 17.22 of the Municipal Cade, modifying parking �-tiIequimiaents for condominium conversions to be c atlatent with Development Code parking. requirements. J. VARIANCE.89-08-GENESIS REAL ESTATE-A request to reduce " 51 the minimum building setback,the mini Parking setizaak,and the average landscaping', + sti: requirements for a 50,000 offies facility =n 4.6 acres of land in the Industrial Park. District;, (Subarea 4'4 of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avonue and 6th Street-APR. 229 341-02 and 04, Related file!Development Review 89 10. VIM New Budn�,�s IC, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT,_A1(6-`DZVELOpMENT REVIEW, 89-10 -GENIIS REAL ESTATE- The development of a54,844 square foot office facility on 4.6 acres of land, the Industrial Park District(Subarea 12)of the industrial Specifie Plan,located on the southeast corner of Nli linen .Avenue,and 6th Etmet - AIPN: 229-34142 and 04. Z. 'Director%Reports t L. CAR WASR11S lit NEIG-11BORHOOII COMMERCIAL,DL.WRIGTS M. THOMAS WINERY>-OAS INVESTORS,-A request to modiN'toiar of light FEE res,and concrete sur ace and color of sidavp;k and founte,)n plaza near ibe'Voothill/Vin.eyard interscetion. S, t�ammnsiamRueineaa X. ETIWAN[DA SCHOOL DLSTRICTS RK' .lieT TO ',ABANDON i PROPOSED ACCESS BETWEEN HE BETWEEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND THE GREENBEi,T PA Eta O. DESIGNATION 09 MEMBER"T6 SERVE ON THE,CENTRAL, PARK LIBRARY PRELIMINARY DESIC N.SUB.-COMI FITTEE XL Pthile Coante ats j � 1 Th€s 'is the time and place for the general public to aa�,w the Cr/*n "-ssior, Items to be discussed here are tt;ose which do not already appear on this agenda. XIL Adjourn Mon4 The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that I, set an 11 p.m.ad foumment time. if items go beyond that time,;they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission, 'r - ICINI rj Al ZI ° di iiggppaMM �Y.j I '. lifw /if OF C770.NK4 /":.•_ �'r t 2ma— too -- lot , CVClhfpfi•fYiS11 GOIlf/T ffflffi♦ fiif/ y- i { 'fR1i$,'8.If�Ztifi►IfYf4 RINt�P r�� env -- `�' -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE; July IR, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Butler: City Planner By: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' FOR DEVELOPMENT 'EVIEW $9-09 '�, tt`- �n us r,a u ngs to a n a eve opment n ` acreF 0 land in the General g Indust asquareDistrictet on 6.95 {Subarea B the Industrial Specific plan) located on the northeast corner of Utica Avenue and Jersey Boulevard - APN: 209-142�IS. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. AcAllk tion Requested• Issuance of a Negative Oeciaratirh B. SurraundiniLand Use and Zoning:, Nart Vapant; enara n ustrial Subarea 8} South - 'Proposed Multi-Tenant Industrial; General Industrial East (Subarea 8). Existing and Multi-Tenant Industrial under construt.tion; General Industrial (Subarea 8). West vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 6). C. General FTr — lan Desi nations. o ec 1e -_Genera no ustriat (Subarea 8 . North - General Industrial Sout -South General Industrial West General Industrial - Industrial Park O. Site Characteristics: The property is vacant without any s7" can vegetal vn. The site stapes naturally to the south. The project is Phase VI of an overall seven phase development which includes vacant property to the north. .r c� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 89-09 BARTON-DEVELOPMENT COMPANY July 12, 1989 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Numbsr of Type Square Parking Spaces ((Spaces ag of Use Foote Ratio Required _'provided. Manufacturing 140,260 1/500 ?,01 300 11. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed project is cohsistent with previously approved Phases I-V. The proposed base is llowed'within the General Industrial Area and ii compatible with surrounding projects. The project fs in compliance with the site development standards of the Industrial Specific Plan and the, site design is consistent with previous phases. Fallowing• issuance of a Negative Declaration, the City_ Planner would grant approval subject to conditions recommended by the,Review Committiees. , B. _Design Review Committee: The project wi� revivfied by the eO—sign�evi"ei: Committee (Chitiea Tolstoy, Coleman) on June 22, 1989 and was approved with,'t!:he following conditions: 1. On Building 4, the small window on the north elevation should be eliminated and the small.window on the west elevation iteouid be enlarged (double in size). 2. The small window on the nor•;th elevation of Buildings 5 and 5 should-be— enlarged (double in size). 3. The west side of Building 5 should be upgraded to include pin striping and additional windows. This side of the building Should logically tie in to Building 4. 4. Additional windows should' be added on the west and north side of Building 12. 5. The small window on the north elevation of Building 8 should be eliminated 6, The small window on the south side of Building 9 should be enlarged. The window on the west side of Building 9 should either be eliminated or enlarged (double in size). - ,I ' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 89-09- BARTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY July 12, 1989 Page 3 7. The small window on the south side of Building 11 should be expa`;,ded. The small window on the west side should be eliminated. 8. On Building 12, triple windows and pin striping should be added on the west elevation, The stepped pin striping should be added on .the north end of the west side of 8uiiding 12 -and should continue along the north side of Building 12. 9.. Pin striping should be removed on Building 5 where it abuts Building 4. 10. The 'yellow pin stripe color should be eliminated and the green color should be chringed to Sinclair CM 8267. C. Environmental Assessmert: Parts I and II of the Initial Study have been comp 4t--eU an3""no significant environmental impacts have been found"as a result of the proposed development:-F 11I. FACTS FOR FINDINGS The proposed use is consistent with the General an In- t e Industrial Specific Plan6 The building design and site plan together with recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with the Industrial Specific`i,.�ian and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare or, materially injurious to. properties or improvements in the vicinity. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Planning Con.aission issue a Negative Decimation for Development Review. 89-09. �Re,5?la 11 flitted ler Cinner 88:BN:mig Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Map Exhibit "B" Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations Exhibit "0" - Landscape Flans 4 -3 i, i u. _11 Zak F a mm Mm Maw VAUNNOW PF, MR -� � �- , DEL IF TV NMTH CITY (F ,�, PLAIVNIIIG CIV'M I EXHIBIT.-A- : A lI � � ��,� , ; •,��:: � 1 �w�rs ..ram *.`f"'r�..�- Y�� I b � t _ ,, . . _ . ; �� ® ,� ; * ~�� �� , � � � +���� �_� �� �. *_ �* .� _ _ __., ___ _. _. AR7q • A.. �� ;� r � i. .�. �, � 3i11.; �;: .� .. r 1 'r NMI Kftvm III Ita 1Rl��l YIRJII� 11•• it --------------------------------.... ............... ........................----------------- .-.. ............-.. r C _ZdLo ; EXV EXHtBCi' SCCrILE ;I AA .-IVA— w. ..................—* l ---------------------------- t I � dy. C w ........ ............... ...•....... r.�.. .... ..•....... I i I CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.ML ONGA �tf it�r�t�tttpp,��r�.. t�^utr rT�tE�,pq. r L.t'8NNI G Dj Y �i ds q• .13i.Gr I i Old PA N=Xr aK ti SOM EMN= 9=1unv p w. CITY OF , rrEM� �uw� RANCH , TMiE- --- d'CANNING DIVLJON EXHIBIT- .,SCIALE- fill I I i mt_. IV .......... • ♦ .... a.. ................. ............... .......... iw�• ► r ti 1_ QACf SUOLDOW 4 CrrY OF PLANNING "CA TnU- V EXHNT, ELF: p s t r CITY C' r • r �. CUCAMONCA y Tmill RaWNING O i t Yby,�ar IL I -•: S �•µ'w1640M� �� J •r � n l�tatsar� {w0poom CITY OF RA NCHO CLCMMONGA Tom; PENNING D(V r E�Hlsrr= sCALE:._ ear�xx�n:n�, lauOLDeA a a_ RANUM CUICA ram= ........... --• :+moo - .. ems... - swarm= rUFAFA '.. - wras =l .v _. ........... „. .._.1...___ xii {uI A i CITY OF' N$Qi�IC`i DIVEMEXHIBIT= JCALE -13 IfClA$s8YA710p. - . tee• FrFr v *an moxmw -- - - - -- -71 IF CITY OF ..� � RANCHO ChiONCA rrLE t.: FOR F. rrEmt i. i`M114i1W�lfpi r . . lbll7flYsiYYh7lG _ ,.. .. KANNIt D(VMONExwI c= scALE. j< Imo T •oum aevmea� ` • • aver t4 t CITY 'RANCHO CLTCA MEM �Ntit DtVtSM EXW[BFI'- ALE; ;� •arrx,axr�ae CITY OF1 ! PIANNINGV 1 F� ��i �:4aaia5faT`3.b i vY�1Hold �+t,t. iferri sraap�8�3 to+5 F lid yy( y '1 ,.y.. , P a (rJTim ,, Tf InIll i l;Yt/O! A iy u �d , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT h: DATE: July 12, 1989 TO: Chairman ,and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Russell U. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Gary N. Shea, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT': 'VACATION OF TNE.FRONTAGE ROAD PLAZA BE LAS BRISAS - A request to vacate the frontage road on Foothill B0,; evar , located at the southwest corner of .Foothill BoulevaH and Ramona Avenue, approximately 30' feet side and 544_feet !"ng _ APH- 206-301-15, 16, 17 - 7i, 1. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: 4 On November 14, 1985, the Planning Comission adapted Resolution Na. 85-114, and approved Conditional Use Permit No. 85 19, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue in the General Commercial District. One of the Engineering Conditions is that the frontage road within the project shall 4e'\Nvacated. t The subject frontage road is approximately+ 30 feet wide and 544 feet tong fronting.Foothill Boulevard. The vacatiap is consistent with the General Plana the Development Code and the Foet►+'r1I Boulevard Specific Pia,i. II. REC"ENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning-Urmeiss on make the finding` that the vacation conforms with the General Plan, The Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval. Respe ly u tted, �1 gui re City Engineer RHM:GNSssd Attachment IOU IT124 13 t EXHIBIT "A" THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 140 FEET WIDE AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 3054, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY' OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORN,IAr AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOX 54, PAGES 14 AND 15 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS- BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT'.122 OF SAID TRACT NO. 3054, THENCE NO;nH 00 05' 20" WESt P.LONG THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 122, 10.00 FEET TO A POINT LYING 60.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE CENTER— LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULtVAP AS SHOWN. ON SAID-TRACT, THENCE NORTH 89° 56., 001' EAST PARALLEL WITH THE CENTP!klufINS Or FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 520.62 FEET TO THE y BEGINNYNG OF A TA*IGENT CURVB. ?NCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND RAVII?G A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTE \\aY ALONG SAID CURVE.fikIOUGH'A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 890 57' 00"' AN ARC LENGTH OF\\37.6d FEET TO A POINT IN'THE PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF RAMONA A'11UE 55.00 FEET WIDE AS SHOWN-ON SAID TRACT; THENCE SOUTH 00 01' 00" ALONG SAID 7?RpZONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE AND TANGENT TO SAID CURVZQ23-2 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT ?25 OF SAID TRACT NO,. 3054� I1 NCE NORTH 450 OS' �0" WEST ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT �`251�1 21.22 FEET TO THE NOR'-H-V'RLY..7a'TF9 OF LOT 12S; THENCE SOUTH 890 56' ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES h':`LOTS 125, 124, 123, AND 122 OF SAID l��?4= 1054, 52062, FLEET TO V? C FLINT OF BEGINNING RESERVING TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ALL RIGHTS OF VEHICULAR ACC —)S EXCEPT THEREFROM THE EASTERLY 36.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 232.00 FEET AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "H;" CONSISTING OF ONE, SAtET ATTACHED HE$ETO-AND MADE A PART HEREOF. _ Ir r 4z�L AND�S.S 'L,. S. 5794 MA— RK S, LkMO��. U , M�,4vtL� J-EXPIRES 6-30�92 No.579i OF c!"Iii i i I, I A %n. N�. H. Wu o s -3ArLn ~ --- X wil r Z%*+OZOV - i M ' i u m 5 N, Nbr1ri :t'3 pt tJ u S n n u t > � N. ;� LLt0 =OGQC h.t ,68'GZZ CO �tn� Qo } 69'SwSZ LU LLI Q? Qd� ,05 ,09 N Ul t All QWd 1 i I1 ;bG 65Z JN J �� a� �_ c �d { �► 4 N N ui c1 Li -J-. t m � ®`n ucd `i a �96'65Z Y Ns: OL I I a 2 r4N N �in ,4D1\4L t{'iE� pwC CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT fi DATE: July 12,E 1989 i TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning.Consnission FROM: Brad Buller, City ;Planner By; Beverly Nissen,, Associate Planner SUBJECT: VARIAN& 89-01 - LANG - A request to construct a trellis structure n efrontyard which encroaches six feet into the front yard setback at 6465 Jasper Street - APN: 1062-621-68 The 'Planning Commission "reviewed the above referenced protect at their ' June 14, 1989 meting. At that time, the CoWssion determined that the proposal was acceptable and directed Staff to return with a Resolution of Approval with findings as a Consent Calendar item for the June 98, 1989 Planning Commission Meeting. The item was pulled for discussion at that meeting. Thl vote was 2 4yes" and 2 "Noery" which resulted in a no action; ,therefd}re, it was moved and approve 3-1 to" continue this item. QResl1Y s ed / 88:BN:sp Attachments: June 28, 1989 Planning=>cTiaission Staff Report June 14, 1989 Planning Commission Staff Report Resolution of Approval I2S C 4_ --- —�- --- CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA ` STAFF REPORT DATE: June 20, 1g89 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY Beverly Kissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT. YARTAk�E 89-oi. - LANG - A request to construct a trellis structure in e ron Yard`which encroaches six feet Into the front yard setback" at 6465 Jasper Street APR: 1062- 621-68 The Planning Commission reviewed the above-refewa,;.�Ied project at their June 14, 1989 meeting. At that tiret� the Commtsstvp determined that the et proposal was acceptable. and directed staff to ru,.'k-ro the Commission with the attached Resolution of Approval with findings, Re ul l tt R d B rI City _l--ner BB:BHko Attachments: June 14, 1989 Planning Ccmmission Staff Report ° Resolution of Approval CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 14, 1999 TO: Chairman and Mewbars of the Planning Commisston FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE 89-01 - LANG - A ?west'>:o construct a trellis s ruc ure n e Tro-K yard,'.,nich encroaches six feet into the front yard setback at 6465 Jasper Strut - Aft- 1062- 621-68. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Review Variance requ.::t. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Wm 51 rig l eeraaw y res en al; Lour Density Residential (2-4 dwelliMg units per acre) South - Si le family residential; Low Density Residential (2-1 dwelling units per acre) East a Single family residential; Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West Single family residential; Low Density Residential Q-4 dwellin4 units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project -Low K65"1 al (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per :acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East -- Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per ecre) !test Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 11. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant �s requ%ting to construct a trellis strru"4urp in their fro-at yard, which would encroach six (6) feet into the minimum 'required setback of thirty-two (32) feet. The p"posed structure is alreedy partially constructed. lhe► applicant is requesting " structure in order to create a front yard entry courtyard and to shade thi front of the house fret the afternoon sun (see attae, letter).. The lot is 121.a feet deep by 82.31 feet wide square feet) and is regulely shaped, the surrounding lots are all of similar size and shape. PCANNITNG COM15SION STAFF REPORT RE: VAMANCE 89-61 4 LAM' June 14, 1989 Page 2 MW The Code prohibits trellis structures or similar patio-cover t�Vs structures within the front yard setback area. These types of structures are typically located in the rear yard of side `;hard of a, lot. However, the,:ride does provide for "eavC;y roof projections, awnings;, .nd rSiMilar architectural featu+es" which nay project into tite front yttr,d a maximum distance of feat, if the structure is-"supported only at, or behind, the .building sefoack line". Although the trellis spay be consi&red an avch,t tectural Beaty-_r4i imi l to an awning, it would cot meet the criteria of'.being supported only at or behind the setback line. In either case, this would not allow a 6-f6ot projection into the front yaed. M. PACTS FOR F111DIMS: The following facts tzauld not support the r a�Pa n"� ce requ4s an aro contrary to the required ffnMngs; 1. That the subject property is not unique with rospdct,to size, shape or topography. 2. A 6-foot trellis: ould..have bean designed'to attach to the front of the house which'would have complie4 with the required setbacts. Any removal of portions of the structure which, have already been built due to the strict or literal interpretation and enfnrcement of the setback regulation would be a self-imposed hardship caused by proceeding without proper approvals'f*om he City. Based upon these facts, it :is the opinion of staff that the granting of this *?iance world constitute a special privilege inconsistent with: the limitations on other properties in the same zone. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in She Daily R "ort newspaper anc�public (searing notices were sent to a11L properties within 300 feet:of the subject site. V. RECONIENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny 'fir a►cep-W tho,cugh adoption of the attached Resolution L of ` Denia,. If, however, the Comis%ion determines that the proposal is acceptable and that the required findings can be made, staff shau!;a 5e directed to return to the June 28, 1989 Planning Comission meeting with 6 Resolution of Approval. 11 %PLMNING COhir0316N STAFF REPORT i 17. VARIANCE $9-01 - L 'I foe 14, 1989 Page 3 -Resp ulIv � ted, Xor er City Pl nner 88t8Ntko Attachments: Exhibit "W Letter from Applicant Exhibit I%" Location YAp Exhibit "Cp"'- Site Plan Ubibit "U" - Perspective Sketch Resolution of Denial Original Poor Quality canopy rellis addition to a front ho,4se courtyard of approximately 4o 4 sq,ft. encroaches t q feet into tho front yard (-2W) setback. Four (_) V X 3 square concrete block pillars on the northern side of the cour�-yard support four (4) legs or a pyramidal trellis-sun shad% structure to screen the front windows from the westerly sun. "Ths. pillars are 8*-d, away fron each outer (2' from existing house', in an east-west direction: and 7'-411 in a' north-south dire.qt.ion,. Th�_pi,llars' are eight (71-811) feet tall' and the 'trellis Members are <approxi:mately 6" on center forming a open, (uncoc-'red) shade structure. TCie cour kard is, approainately'!1.oa sq.ft, ati<t 4& partially permed towards the street . reducing the overall height of the trellis structure to about. a1 high, The g' "nd floor footprint'of the noise and. garage are about 1a00 sq;,ft, on aWoo sq.ft. property;and the house was, placed verb near the street which created difficulties for entry approach (in a traditional way) and for shading of the western foce of the home-structure. Vie courtyard was designed to soften the entry approach and crteete a' :ransi4ion fron with'-� and without of the front door (or a.buff6r) for nai.se and light. The trel:l,is structure would be the final,. step <n cor.Rpleting the area but because of the lack of a front raid would need p.- !on fr(r-., cit-y zoning ordinances to encroach into the typical cDnt yard set 'back. The encroacpri�ut really only oons:yts of the open stmtcture as there Arc as fic rules cQnceriiiny ..he pillars themselves (uncovered):. Therefore +r are sinply asked to nase the property and neighLorhaod t:.Qrt 1%4ujle wi.111e-r.�ala'tte�ning all open and. �isablrfr-ntagr of ztt� properv_• `J .04 1 40 � � ••.�'�}V Ce�s'D'x ^9"-� `1 s.,7 }sI ''.....•x��",t„t•..+ +r "", �. 5� 5-41 16 33- "tat"", r ' c: r� I � 'diN,�'OMy7 Ii 3 Y{ c'�'C °^C `--•--=��K �c'4�t• M f' . �`. s � A TF' x LAWN � �----`- , `,F. i+ IENTRY COURT GARDEN 4 CI'T'`V CFtip R 1` Tnut PLANNING DIVISM EXHIINT-�.� SCALE Proposed. Wood Trellis Existing Concrete Block Pillars \� Courtyard Concrete Block Wall Grass Berm_ MY CF R-A ,N M 7tV EXHIBIT=. SCALE, � �> G--y' RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMRISSION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 89-01, A. REQUCS f0 CONSTRUCT A TRELLIS STRUCTURE IN THE FRONT YARD OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 646rs JASPER STREET IN THE LOW DENSITY' RESIOERJ'AM DISTRICT (2-4- DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND Mk.'ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: I062-621 F8 A. Recitals. (I Dale and Judy Lang have filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No.. 89-0 as described in the,„title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request,is referred;to as „the application". (ii) On June 1:4, 1989 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public nearing on the application and concluded? said hearing on that date and directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Approval for consideration on their next consent.;,calendar agenda. (iii) On June 28, 1989, the Alarming Commission pulled the Resolution of Approval from the consent calendar for discussion and continued the item. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B, Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I.. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence ,presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearis,g on June 14, 3989, including written and oraT staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application contemplates the construction of a canopy-trellis structure of 90 square feet and a height of apprGAimately 12 feet which, consists of pyramidal wood trellis supported by four concrete pillars, and (b) The application applies to property located at .6465 Jasper. Street with a street frontage of 82.31 feet and lot depth of 121.5 feet and is presently improved with a single family residence; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: VA 39-01 - LANG July 12, 1989 Page 2 (e) The property, to the north of the_ subject site is Low Density Residential,: the property to south of that site consists of single family residenti.1 and is designated Low Density Pwsidential the prno?irty to the east is Low Density Residential, and the propgriy to the tvesZi k. L-�w Densi y ftsidential : and (d) The trellis structure will have a positiva impact on the existing streetscape and will enhance it and (e) The trellis, structure will be an attractive architectural feature which will draw attention away from the-,dominant 4-c4r garage; and (f) The trellis structure Will provide afternoon shade to a west-facing building. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public ,'gearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and',;? above, this Cormission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strictor literal interpretation, and eisforcement of the specified regulations would not .result in practical difficulty or he unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent :With the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That there are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicMe to the property -involved or to the intended use-of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. (0 That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) 7hat the granting of the Variance gtil constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the°s district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. - 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this ComiHission hereby appr5ves the application. S. The Secretary to this Comission shall certify to the adoption of this Resclution. PLANNING VgMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: VA 01 - LANG "'1uly 12'(�183 E age 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS`IZTH"DAY OF JULY, '1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF-RANCIO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNial, Chairman ATTEST: Brad u er, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the-City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was du'y and regu?arly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the. I2th day of July, 1989, by the folloW:ng vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSICNERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r u`Y =� 5 —— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIViONGA STAFF REPORT � f� DATE: July 12, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comnfssion FROM: Brad Buller, City i`fanner BY: Brew Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AW TENTATIVE TRACT 13351 - t WIS HOMES -- A residential su v s on and design-review or 11F con ominiu s on 5 lots and 8 single fancily lots on 9.07 acres of land in the Medium 'density Residential ;District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) within the: Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the southwest corner of,Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avenue - APN: '1077-091-34. (Continued from June 28, 1989) 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIONS A. Action Requested: Approval of the s0division mapll and issuance o�, a Negative Declaration; approval of ehe conceptual plot plan, grading plan, landscape Olin, and building elevations for the condominium and single family units. B. Protect Density: 13.9 dwelling units per acre (overall site) 10.7 dwelling units per acre (single family) 14.0 dwelling .utits per acre (condominiums) C. Surrounding Lend Use and Zoning: Florth condo-m-i,,-iT-wns—;-*FWdi-tn--Fensity ,ResidenttaY (8-14 dwelling units per a re). South - Single family homes; Low-Medium D%nsity Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). . East - 'ftcant, Low 4.'31. Density.Re -(dential (4-8 dwelling . r units pea' acre) West - Single family homes; Law-Median Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per--acre). ', General Plan Designations: Project ire- Low-medim Density .Residential North Low-Medium Density-Residential South - Low-Medium Density Residential East Medium Aensity Residential West Low-Medium Density Residential �b ,f PLANNING commissm STAFF REPORT RE: TT 13351 LEWIS'HOMES July 12, 1989 Page 2 E. Site Charapteristics: The site is presently vacant with same grapey ne 7rege on, The site slopes approximately 2 percent from north to south. ri. ANALYSIS: A. General: Lewis Homes proposes to develop the site with two era uc types: single family detached haws which are the same product.type (Calai,) used in the adjacent tract to the west and so��� and Z%and 3',bedroom attached condominiums. The new single`..amily.units ba k onto the proposed condominium units. The two-unit types a'e separated by a 6-foot high block wall and open space. The 8 single family lots will take access;-,off of existi 9 Belpine Street, while new private drive aisles will serve the 118 condominium units. The apr.11cant has indicated that both product types will be constructed at the same time. B. Design Review Committee., The Design Review Committee reviewed the proposa on February 2, 1989 (Slakesley, Ghitiea, Buller) and ,February 16, 1989 (Chitiea, Tolstoy, Coleman). The project was reviewed again on April 20, 1989 (Chitiea, Tolstoy, Coleman) and recommended approval!' iWject to the following conditions: 1. -The 8-reverse"and (A) units should be deleted from Building 10 to provide more distance to the exiting homes to the south. The parking stalls in this area should also be relocated to provide more backyard area, 2. lbe rear lot line on Lot & should be ,�. ised to provide more backyard area. 3. Special detailing, such as wood rafters or brackets/beams, should be provided at the bottom of the4 econd story building overhangs above the garagert. The details should be revieeed �,hd approved by the Planning Divis4.on, 4. Stucco trim should be used around the i,ieet underneath the stairs on the side elevations. This detailing should also-be used around- ti e sh-ter adjacent to the recreation building. S. The gas meters and all other utility fixtures should be screened with low walls berms, or landscaping. These fixtures may also be enclosed within the outdoor storage areas. ti, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RepaRT RE: TT 13351 LEWIS HOMES PagJuly e2, 2989 f c ! 5 The greet;`.accent color should be changed to a fless intense hue. NOM. All but the last,two (Items 5 and 5) of these conditions have. been satisfied. in revised plans submitted by the applicant since the Design Review Committee meeting of April 2% 19$9. C.. Technical Review Committee: lbel Committee !reviewed the project and. determined tha w th the recommended ;conditions of Approval, the project is consistent' with al" applicable standards and ordinances. 0. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has een completed by We"app scant, Part It of the Environmental Checklist, coM. loted by staff, found that although the project no hbee a significant IfIcant effect iect on nhethisircantbecause there will the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study have been added to the project approval, 1. liaise: The project is subject tc gnificant npi O impacts along Milliken Avenue. A prd!ininary—acoustical .study has been prepared which le-ratifies mitigation measures, ;=oynd barrier walls) needed to bring the site fi\.to conformance with City noise standards. A final, acoustical report will be submitted {see Condition No. 4) to identify precise measures Which must be incorporated into the final project design. 2. Schoals: 'the project was continued from the May Planning Commission maeetiq, due to the school capacity concerns which were raised by the Chaffey Joint Union high School District. 'The District, City and Building Industry k sociation have met to address the School Districts concerns and have arrived at an agreement to ensure adequate school facilities fare proposed residential developments. On June 7, 3989, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance 395 which establishes policy for. a condition to be placed on all pending residential projects to ensure adecplate school capacity. This coadition has been added as Planning Division: Condition No. 1 of"the Tentative Tract Resolution of Approval. C)- PLANNING COMMISSION STAR: REPORT RE: TT 13351 - LEWIS LCsi:IS July 12, 1989 Page 4 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Terra Vista anne '. unity and the General Plan. The project X1,11 not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. I�1 addition, the proposed use is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Terra Vista Community Plan, the 0evelopment Code and City Standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This IUD has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper-Fs—a, public hearing. The property has Deen posted an notices were sent to all Property owners withinADO feet of the project site. V. RECOMM UDATIOR: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission apprcle` lentative Tract: 13351, subject to the Conditions of, Approval, through adoption of the attached Resolutions +'and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Res idly tte Bra (er City P anner BB•BH:ka Attachments: Exhibit "A" Leiation Map Exhibit "B" - Subdivision Mip Exhi tit "C" - Si to M an Exhibit -0" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditions Resolution of Approval for Design Review with = Conditions_ >,.. Original Poor Quayy TENTATIVE TRACT N0.13351 ff.%=I calm w am ns9nustMo ert w uuwaau ,..a[rna.im. rows.I.r p-.a.ao'r.su.r w>wl.e ,•••rraiwn tILLM/4Ylafa IA iaLtMNaYlltla llOfOttlia! _ i aiiV W C YYfL.t CRI'fati tRt ^1//� \` t4Ci Fd INit L• tA/Q ttlf{ ■CAti 'aD.ti/a4 ti>';tt7•MRtaW 1� Y 6M:lYi•YIIitYYO I�t r I.w n{fli g r \ yJ • Ali>t M. oet.>uw �'' •i� i i a�w �' •' �' Y9 // F7 f ' NGRTH OF ITEM, tip'rlik 130 RANCHO CUCA ONGA TITfs: A PLANNING DIVISION D-5 EXHIBIT ____..SCALE: �a�� oedina4 Poor Il TRA-CT No. _ 13271 I I ��'�"�`! v`41t;t 1 ° _4 � �����"�'�•����.F/1'Y �1"^i.`}\`�1� � ��' i 1 TOAl a a 11. /f�kk TRA \',ram, •t�,�.�,.. °'�,5 ,!� / > f �-t � t 1 __11 iii. c9 t'�'-ram._--•—'�� - s -'��� ---t' i9 V\`\�°✓��� = .'.`� �. r-J �E ♦ / / \ �'�-"'��J `� � 1 Ott t __r r Ida. �C•,�i ;�� r r \ �� Y �•( j j! j'� V. 4A, T\.L ♦�� 8 le 1! �= j 13 1 14 1 yl i 1 f f fit'i/ ,fT;\�\ 1!'.1� It It l 1 1 y ♦ _11 Ili t � , it �/ •�"�� -�.-��-�'7� t I NORTH I ' 0 F ITEM RANCHO CUCAMONGA nTLE:, h Original Poor' QualityI g — ---� YYiYA j- t...a' .•." 1 - __ • r f'ai�• fir. y t + / r w .,.1 ,'1 1 :h Iw � IW ar r oer tAi CJ�C�G '-q�1��•.a . v t a �' 1 .. \, r i �!!r`y'�.• e b N 1. 12 1 13 1 3. I. hOiPteS e �J N FN OF ITEM: RANCHO UCA1V ON A TITLYz- �% PLANNING DIVT,IoIv ' �-� EXH'B'T:.�.SGALE:..� M1 id���,�td � O �/ �,�•r »�►y (; may' �d'. dff.�.*. ��,,► Jr t 5 6ff .fit t f " li " . I k` T rot 1 � {r$ +j�. r Yr.1i• 4��t_=ffili�P�, '��'�° eft � q'`�ula Aft ��•'4f R+ 7 d ��r AA a hA' i031•itD e �r O sg d♦ A. EH�S . $XTEMfOM YJ.7INALf twum wow raRea C*�A"(:}Ri*OW a ma aes > �� 8. �pa ft4' e As 06 0 b L ACT ME EtKYATsoil ExTmos ru sprat s wwo WON f4scar" f —CZ FIRM DID&CLEVATIQM k 'I cinrnt RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ✓il rr� �/�t� �a�as P NNING I IVT!310 D-/0 EXHIBIT: imp ea'. L6 .06) LEFT 1416E ELEVATION 48 .. � � !� �eCtP.��iU�t rdrdllaa►'1� tti P �.J m HEAR ELLVATIOii d AfGHT SIDE ELEVATION I TY 0F ITEM: 7c4Pi r �� I33 ! R `CA NA TITL$:. s. .F. e�/ ion E--3 IP'LANNING DIVISION D-// EXHIBIT:. . FRONT ELEVATION S 5/;/e rya 4,y berms `.°� �Ti ,t�; oRQ� � CITY OF ITEM: P L NNI � DIVISION p-12- EXHIBIT: r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION c�. ' THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVTNG TENTATIVE TRACT MhP NO. 13361, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 118 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND 8 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, LOCATED WITHIN THE TERRA `VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY ON THE SOUTHWEST'CORNER OF hii LIKEN AVENUE AN!) TERRA VISTA PARKWAY IN THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT —APN: 1077-091-34, AND MMI'fra FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i)'- Lewis Hones has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Trait Map No. 13351 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this, Resolution,:the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application"'. (ii) On the 24th of May, 1989 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted A duly noticeiP'pubii^. hearing on the application and continued said hearing to July 12, 1989, and aongluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prereNisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Ask B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and reso1v d by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts see: ;orth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this commission daring the above-referenced public hearing on July 12, 1989, includfdg written - and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkw<y with a street frontage of J790 feet on Milliken Avenue presently unimproved; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a condominium proJ-.rct, toe property to the south of that site consists of single family homes,, the property to the ;east is vacant, and theproperty to the west' is single family homes. 3. Based upon the substbritial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public `;hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and,�2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: '' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, RE: Tr 13351, LEWIS HOMES f July 12, 1989 Page 2 (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or imprrvements of the tentative.:tract is consistent with the General Plan, Devalo� ant Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically 'suitable for.the type of development proposed; and (d) The design -zf the subdivision is not likely .to-cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury.-.t+l humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public - health proalems; and (f) The design -)f the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at Tsrge, now of record, for access through or use c7 the property within the proposed subdivision. 4, This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has b,en reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 197.0 and, further, this Commission hereby issues ar•Negative Dec aration. S. Based upon the findings an&conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and-every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 11 Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes -j: first, the applicant shall consent to or participate ir,, the establishment of a.Mello Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site, to provide in conjunction with the applicable School District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any School District has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shazi, in the alternative, consent to, the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing Pistri.ct prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. i 1( i i PLANNING COMiISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: TT 1 it - Mrs Norms July 12, 98R Page-3 Further, if the .affected S:hool District has not formed a WA o-Roos Community 'Facilities District within twe months of the date of ' approval of the pr64'-t and prior to the recordation of the M6 ' neap or issuance of building' permits for said 1, project, ` this condition shall be ueemet null and void. Engineering Division 1) Construct Hilliken Avenue full width from Base G Line,Road to tao.hill Boulevard, including the traffl,; signals at Foothill Boulevard. Parkway improvements beyond the tract boundaries may be �^ deferred until development of the adjacent property, 2) The approved street improvement plans -for Mlliken Avenue shall be revised to include a bus bay, and right turn lane for the project driveway and the extension of the intersection drain, to the,' satisfaction of the 'ity ' Engineer, ? 3) The parkway and median island landscaping on M lliken Avenue shall conform to the results of the City's beautification study for Millike6,�) a) Prepare a median landscape master plan for Terra vista 8arkway �-o the satisfaction of.the , pity Engineer and Cf�y PlAnner. The nrsster ;Ian limits shall ext&ld l.rom Church Street to Church Street.. 5) Extend the Millikc/Terra Vista Parkway intersection drain to outlet into the storm drain which ends at the south property line, 6) Separate Mull maps shall be recorded for the eight single family ;lots and for the condozaini um lots, 7) All master plan stone drain facilities `,ithin fiIlliken Avenue shall be installed prier` to construction of street improvements. 6. The Secretary to this CoWssion shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUtION NO. o RE: TT 13351 - LEWIS HOMES July 12, 1989 Page 4 r` c; APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF c��.Y, 1989. t PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Carry �t�; see, cAairman ATTEST: —y -Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the 'Planning Co,1*tssion of tFe-'City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that,tha, f6j�- Iing Resolution was duly �tnd regularly introduced, Passed, and adopted by,ate Planning Commission of ine City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission h0 d or the 12th day of July, 1989, by'the following Vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: 1 -J NOES;; C"ISSIONERSs' ,'!R5i' : COMMISSIONERS; -s t ti� E; ` -7 V O V f.y •r SN lJ i�'.LiI O„ S L M 8 • 13 a8y '�m % .,`�,... 11V�y p �' + YSV. 4 y �`.� ia4S� sIw L.� ��� 04a. g� tsL u"S 7 Z-.`." 1 f3 ..k`O �:y4�� M�u4ss � sQ��x. eY� 3w Iasih L M o _6 i 9 LO�Y a H�`�p'Y Y O� ` �aR�C •N:`M "`Ks�NVMMtl pS cAVy~t Y ^ Flsa f/gs 'Oy'a+pC�•�4 c CSiy$ YM'�p' .d}}' wY �. � ,V S O.L �rw�YV9. NCtto Y�g NkC 6L� OtLTa Y�Cr6i 'a�K �' �� M.� sZZ 21 I .'ux III€V O a Ankh .� s Zcnp 8 M-Ch b. PY ar- IL ri '3 g t : 0 lot ^ ,t 34 Mug ^u�o�a¢qac $�� �`G� �.L� • a�i.�J�i w� —{. Om�MY. — N�^a ai �q+ +.tu cy 1j, +wi> g9� SS O p co i?�33 GY 1- aq r-C ;a—ft NMI MSW�' N u ! Nit Mfl is'.1i • Isal !21 13= p • £ii N ss £ ee o bil r ;� s � s�'���.�, = ss ys`1MO� a.— M "TV-as — +—. e. t o 20 e u 1 �351Y$ �llM: '' 3Yi �C" A cb �ci �C XI /7 X1 D�/ 44 IN 1C L3 - M •tl --L .'!R s�frpm g ma _41 `Ln'�h9 V2i �'O!O�.M .^��.�.�'� ya.' +{Z�a1 g- x QO'6' M yµy �M' M ~ W -s ,♦V MyyO Y.$! rs��1l. d0pY1 pNQ@^. fi Ct�O N/pfy �w�y� M MA O. ` ♦" 11'1.w2 M6Y M C -Sa- C eR �0i 01 Gglug& ao " gas a.nmb r> �! �s AafiyLL�.O.ayy`N us .� a,g � •e.::��ZyN.�� Ley "'! ZOO ¢,tea va 'C`1L ' y�1�•fill 3 r N Y w,+70. 6 goy C _C¢",Oy N �. LO�p }k C. OM Mfa MwOLN - «y.�@ Z'. iNL eY MN~ O�it�.N _w sQsQ i��y.�`�1'1,•\� 1,� �i�O ��R3 11.11. L O N►NOM <Nw <M 7N0 i+ilx <NMY�'e� it Y( O <Ja T► 4 1 1.11. N a 1 M Yw M Y YM• IL Be lit ' lo rsS ,fig ��•�' �� $� � ;g^�� �;�� � �~� � ' �� "Ole aa +0 "' 3. po M'p VV ee � O a s3 $; rah 0 da s 0+� e • L Y �Ig 1 M. M.V R-3 A Z. :nr p.IIYw. Y�Or Sf M! ! i 4N +�pY a�Y _ �i',4. ..5TL g�JE9.L". r L l .ctl� N fl. ^Irg A. ` ■•. Y EN. `3yS� rrG�S t3f���i $'T9 y� y�7a« �u IN, Arm.... ' aY. p! �L� I Oys�cC66 ��'uggu 1trl ' 00 t HpYM is OY k Q V E P nJ 9%H� Yam. tl a Ji ¢ 3 P&I' •i to:w -.� Y Y SSSY}}} tl +■.R. /��{Vqq. yam !� s$^9YYYY{�. �9h Is i;0 Y�a(lgr! .36. Z OK d a. �:��:4 �'IO 7MW; g rPxX. Y ri pp y' �voe ao,�.. y .C+� },�i. peq �y Ewa v3 �. '_N �K. _��g� GIb4 �` �i3:&Y e[�'VM{r '����� � �� fir•. ail .Y L' N. L� LL .T.(.�-a m.. g+,,'+Ta• $u..g •Lo.Y$`' p .�7a Q V j SY tl yV tltlR rp b� Y+' Y4•� y"V'�•+ ^ •�b� 0. MO.P L�Qy 9S tt w 4�+ ®�ggwm N. as Bit �.b"'b aIyP 8 � � oY���c i-3, � 0 iS ++ u yM. Y w `� u u rC a ' i ., w y... gnat +Yy � �:� 7 4. A,tl tl i Y yn yy L R Y V4 m_ g Gtli 4� 0 tl o3. N° n `•l a�e�lt}'.. �.°! ( � gN�Sw � qg R9C. .eg Sufi Fi $ w ^ v u r+. as ri I; Z I ! I 9 ; x -I Oat r s 8 09 V z sag a-a aY ag.NY1 �Yy«.`� '+RS �m�• �O'Mg+O Y'� YO`a �m •S Tic L p. Cab �i qa g},pIM A�i•9 3 0..»i rqd mnm.. Las tl .A }I ` m Y tl= �s4a .w 4T �g ��• ¢ q, q *�� {°�IAO PNJ�rI �aw� a�^tl oQiA {C we 44jf r� -a .•6. Y3 Zw 1f:$�. C �A��V� E.�$ aua+• 1. A-i wa so M M L •; itl M D-2-0 ; sod YMr�]v Y' Y �• T N� y ii4O.,CCY�O 99� 1SY m�j �'17R All ' .bs .Z' >a4 s5•^--� ia� .ram„ �. y y fit.. gy C E { u �^.. m+w `'y w»wq�. G..s1W ^"tZ •� �, IOU dpY �. aw y. .o �c a,"q my ¢. . phpi� dyBN.� cog W.G m9[O�[i�C'V amN {�� Vgge� a A y.am.My Nc} Rd maw»S � am oma , CL .. .a �pury �••"a yu.. _ Qp pp po p 24 49C'.�tl. +aeY7. �:a Ccuu7Xw }a S R� �mC°' S foil 32 IR :+ }rg P2g{�� 24 H y-1G a �1 p w'� :I? it�I Pd 1 ( 1sy�l �t 4��7�+� a4. ^sip a I�■$I� 6�»a .pm„i9— 1 N~ 4 g V »$ q �.�. it .vC.= ice+W 1 .P N� C4J �0� � �• wL� 1 f `:+ �_ �� zvg "rs �to+A� •�• � `+a`3 A ii1�i�"'� «e� i '�"+6o'�Q . `pSl $� X '�'® E44� ~8w'�3 3 M� All �.-•J &� >Y YyE Pis M � o � a� -sit I W-1- "� aLe4 $ � ��o� $ �+ `" p a Ng 3 N re I..— eeyy Sig 4 i1 c y y • 1� Y q ^ W4 0 v L. Ly�Y tl � �F� �.. L� •� V 0 .i �'.M e. . °Paw `m L3 t r �■■e� GQ b$ '•�M1 Q "y'_y� e'c1 ..•{�A v tiY O$,O� •t +� AG gyp• Yi O, YF.'0 •� S.om� a-w au 23 33Nt`V of Lo am NZ �tl tl Y $ y� i � `gam 4� Y$'� ♦ q� 1t�o.. T bAl 2 tA X.Xj U.! =—U 53 all 1Ii 3^+!'gyp y � `Iw� �6 UN. YJ 41� �� V �� W �#Y� �• p. A tl }M ITS M_ Y YY Y {'�' • 8 �IJ t ggM Gii i+lg _ .9 �1. Yea AL 2All klu � US OU 4 - 4Y �rr q "d 1'L �Q Cfoi� uW All o CV 2 yy� Ze I .22; a all 1 1 q aa �' r g Spa HQ rs$ Y�g oY C' ' °�2T$ a p T•� ''aa �'�_ E. gin 41 q C� g tl it Y Yq�0b gYY_ GB \lq1� �p � � •� HIS gg Fy .S. nmA'� RIyffieb. pa Y :ts Ca �.i. rl .�u� dint► all u RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 'CF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMD!?GA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO.,,13:5:1"FOR THE DEVELOPMENT- 0 118 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND <8: SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, LOCATED WITHIN THE TERRA r VISTA PLANNFD COMMUNITY ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY IN THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OISTRICT - APJk- 1077-091�34, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT-THEREOF )j A. Recitals. ' (i) Lewis Homes has filed an apple cation for the Design Review of Tract No. 13351 as described in the title o�� this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request,(is referred, as "the application", (ii) On May 24„ 19S9, the Planning Commission_.of the .City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application and continued said meetir+a to July 12,1989, (iii) All legal prerequisites to .-he adoption.of this Resolution have occurred. B. Reso`lution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows, 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the; cts set forth in the Recitals, Pv t A, o.f this Resolution are true and corm. 2. Rased upon substantial evidence presented to this''Commission during the above-referenced meeting on_July 12,, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby SPSC ,Acally finds as follows. 1, That the proposed project is consistent with the F objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed design is in accord with thg objective of the Development Code and the paraoses of the district to which the site is located, L�'J t 3. That the proposed design is in compliance with Each �� s of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and J .. PLANNING COMMIS%ON RE50LUTI N NO. RE: DR FOR TR 13351 - LEWIS H014tS July 19, 1,989 Page 2 Ask 4. Than the proposed des'rgr, together vith the conditions appllca67 le t.'rtereto, will not be detriiental to the public health, safety, .or welfare, or Materially injurious to properties or impro emnts in the vicinity.' 3. Bas,d upon the findings and conclusions set north in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this CoOtission hereby approves the applicatinr �,;biect to each and every condition set forth below and in t'e attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Oivision- 1) vas meters and/or any other utility fixtures shall be screened from vieyr' with low walls, berming, and/or landscaping These fixtures may alsp be enclosed with4,"n outdoor storage areas if possible, 2) Tea are(� accent color prroposed' for use shall be chang�W to x less intense hue. 3) All retikning walls visible to public areas shall b4l constructed of a decorative material to be ap)roved by the City Planner.. 4) A final �cuustical study shal'T be prepa �d and submitted for review prior to issua�,ce of building permits. The study she.l addres',, the noise generated along both Terra Vista Par Cway and Milliken Avenue and shall identify mitigatien measures to;be Incorporated irstd' the final project design. 4. The Secretary to this Cormission shall certify!to the adopt sat of this Resolution. APPROV>rU AND ADOPTEG THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNi el, Zhairman ATTEST., _ Braa Buller, Secru ay r� t( LPLANNING. COMMISSION'RESOLUTION NO. r RE: OR FOR TR 13351 w LEWIS, HOMES July 12r 1989 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Coma!ission`of, the. City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certI.y that the foregoing.) Resolution was duly;- and regularly introduced, -passed, and adopted by the Planning Corm�issigp of the Cit i of Ran-ho Cucamonga,'at a regular meeting of the Planning Comiis`'sion hod 4E; or, the 12th day of July,. 1989, by,the following vot4- o-wit» -AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COM MISS13NERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: - 7 4r c IlC > M f aY.V7{N 4�. y$ M « �• ��'�j YOi J�g�. 6V at�Yw•��. Y■Q D�•�r>yre+e��.'i Y-� i yyM YL+aY. Y. YY•+ly��J YAW 6 � 4ry9yL p w }f'V YY��A ' � $gg = 14" "liplp-11, hill! 1�� cu A CL y lyY` 1NY c■ y� ` 4_� �oSTHE^.�` �pA' i yam. xl !N �, y p «e b H As 3� �5. r � " E�.. � N �. ..�. a �� �Sp �•_:��,�8.. P1 J, 231 N b 1 N' D-Z7 VIA �lyt»$i� o� rwM.[..-I _ $3p.4� Y»M^ '.....OSO4. Yir.��. , :OIs Y.J81O. INCAe y `3NE E ;3a.Y»,x.-s.. '-a c Ja.s. u �u$�Jr^»"'$. ��VL 3N O��O�i _ EY W 4 SS' Y Ly QV �4! - '. OIY fg� avi wf..' YN Nw�S �O'O1 CQ ro« sl- P$. $3�r. $i 3a „ a Ms3w»$I% ISM '$` wry.wio 2.2 Z. y 8»V.+ �It v�m o"y/. `,�t� �"'$" S�r �a N gu`c u_wR"> ` � �s �y���^`�." 1i a'fw off'• »��6 fix • a ` i!� ` �" Y L gii l� s � _�- -1 Jtit son akr 3 4 M s -9 � � _ - _ —13 via !a fig all it xi X� �_ 2. 2 1� AY w4V V` Yy��y`�N .`rt alai! .� ssi Y �... `N aga}jr'� y�.ri, l3Y�� T. 4 $a yy, T c«t '^� rw:XN`o d"'+"F N'Q�.' �.,�0� (p�� dz' _VL 2 ql 4 4 g 44 »NO r4g~ .wf 6 .. is p p ��40 W4 YAy11�n��1 y1 O` 4 4iJ{.S{t.S a^ V SL y.N L4yy.. �•f pghA Nw wNy� Pig 9aCya`poF ov # N.y-p1A«V a. �"'�'y a yi- ��Y�• Of 9 .6y �s ION gii rrm 4i:Q��Y: • ��...� � � �a3� LYy 1% 4% is s^u cb M t a f&Sal- 9-1 ».$: » Ms2-3 e oil it 1 U. a.'4N al at!:4 5.3 Z i i \ 1 4 M • _.L 1 a y^ Oil ac .. •yE g� ^(.oafs ! cu a �. 4 up•11 9L \ aS 1.N F� q�� •ae t C4 god Zvi 8�13$�`Y '"$ 3 3 oa`gS� .+•a ,o.2 =s S `�{yI +�_ x 4 q YL;�g. �.�+�� �a1�8 W Y�$` r. W`� a `ai o oz� „; �" r.L s c N�M1Q :Cant S`I��K sAY��Ci �. a�.t a~i Le •,W bv� Naey,Q' n�,4e� 1�@ � �•..� '� Mw. o a � ram$ V M+ � ` `\ » G•��> {awl �aV s S M CCO Y1 4 V ras '{`�V.� Z T.`.���. Yji .- is � p 9' 1 • Cs`a s 1i�. u� q4T:3 wZ •• .s i.� .� 4 ...Vra ybS ry i� _��_ y s _• t_g _ ems+ a� zi If 4 ZZ 4 ZZ Tjlf �•iV ~ , .. Ps N Y�G ye 31 3"s --. I I jai U -SOW. y M p A.ec'ps, a a •w 'rt'Y��yypp S a,y�+v�I .. $O �•' ;�°r. ` sa ��111■.� x�o UA Y e�G M MM•� 7 ']y vle aw Q •�a Ns 1423 = wy szal `v �g VC;l :r. `�`::.'�'"' k ID _3Q l I I d B 8' � rtlPG ` V =i� � � � • Ya 41 134 31-]ag'g d a M ^ _ "� ii5" -$ a .+ :� �`• s I z a 1 ` 3 IL Mp}1, .per ^COb a yc` c0 �4p� � oe� �Lut t n� a � wt��'•§' fa{4 Q 00 g�T,a N.:�._�G.;,N�. L• �gy:. •C. •. Yam. C N, V if ca ++^9 NN SfiY•.tbt PR� �1 1•J i» Y {pe��.�pY 71Ypn •_^ Cw^ ^,r C■v�'�..�YJ Y 4�10.a O� VOiO L i i1 Ye. •S.s Y3.2 CO V 4•tl R af Y Y� _� ^_ f Y^s tt r g!! Ywd �' 3a3Z1i o Q 0� �T COg egM M:O .N '^ s^ �y4,� �■» a�yTxa � � • erasa,-Y:se` ISITL ILI 21 b i sl 3,. i€ �yera- '� "te r (� q o raj y N+� p� ^a�.V u. 'pl It i a de Y •� �'® � :r g +� a. Li k a.� ; .•z- IS v � b ppp �•7■r71}, ��p ea y `` yyyy y Np C•+ i Y l� Y .0� �. i•pypl�i�M y: aV N .Nypy 11 1 1.. is affil HI Poi. �I �I � � � �f yl .�► �� D- : .c �sij� . �. en IL Zr "yam gZ1 €y �' y3 z`� - mg Q' a� _� $p G P � CL 2'� ery� Fia qqo 6T� .Y �+�r wY E M+ to pY�M d� G4 N i r.a4 door, aL". s r. .9 2 .. �s �.. ..�� 1 --�•_� "+ '!� JO6ya�.M Yr_>. yOy�l.iit ^� }Y M4-w�H �^ •i �� Gq �♦~E M � � �� ���a. N 4.s- NO 9+r•M iC 41 y r..~rM N L 16r .! �O ± 1�1 Y s�+Mii 1 b �� y L.rr ppp��r i� Syr NY 4yr �� w rIf aig. a "+. Si $ r C;wri u�ioIS ILA�a >wtM .r x a r X X • x� 3 s :gTL +. r r• y: w � BiM : �F)� RZ Ila al r Qi «� fir v �2 �o v lu 4-5 i N. LYir .40T r i� Y��i � 1 • � Y L b• 3e 74 siv w. W Y� ai •~ � � �� j��w�a w� a ,-LL 4 � of _� a X4 �1 { i;; —— CITY'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 12, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission { FROM: brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, Assistant Plannar SUBJECT: ENVIRGNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-16 - UPLAND MASON _- A requestCo establish a con ractor's o ce an —yard-'in an existing non-conforming building totaling 6,400 square feet on .82 acres of land In the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side cf Archibald Avenue, north r of the Southern Pacific Railroad might-of-way - APN: 202- 141-12. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION• A. Action Requested: Approval of a non-construction Condi .im.0 us-F-Permit for a change of anon-con'rorming use. II B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zonin4: North Apartments; a um Residential (8-14 dwelIirM knits per acre). South Vacant; Neighborhood Commercial. Ease - Equipment Rental Yard; Medium-High Residential (14- 24 dwelling:units `per acre). West .Elementary School; Mdedium Residential (8-14 dwelling units p6ii acre)..- C. General Plan Designations- oject Site - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units Far acre). Na-th - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). South - Neighborhood Commercial. East - Medium-High Residential -(14-24 dwelling units per acre). West Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). D. Site Chat.`acteristics: The project site consists of an existfng L,A ng wit paved parking and storage areas. 31 IMR Er- i i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT lc CUP 83-16 UPLAND MASONRY July 12, 1989 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Ty.A� Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Office 1,763 1/2F1 7 7 Warehouse 4,637 111000 5 4 Storage Yard G 4 Total 6,400 is 15 F. Applicable Regulations* The Development Cope Section 7.0 . 30 Non- 'on arming Uses and Structures) allows naa- conforming uses to be charged to a different nort-conforming use provided that l) there is no new structure, 2) said use is not of greater intensity, and 3) said use is not enlarged or expanded beyond previous boundaries. If these criteria can be rt;t, then the Planning Commission may consider a`Conditional U r Permit proposal. 1I. ^VLUIS A. General.. The applicant is proposing to establish a contractor's office and yard on their existing 6,400 square foot building addressed 7090 Archibald Avenue. At this time. proposed hours of operations are from ' 00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Primary users of the building will be estimators, clerical staff and 1omputer 'technicians. The storage yard will house various small equipment, trucks, and raw materials fqr the formation of brick and block walls. The applicant has indicated that ,to 'large truck traffic will frequent the site and therefore, they�yil' abandon the ;oading dcck and no large truck storage areas; will be required. B. Issues: The primary issu6s rela.ed to locating this non- con,or—ming use within *he residential district are compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods, noise, adhering to present parking requirements, and intensity of the use. Within the Immediate area, there are a variety of residential uses, such as single family homes, senior citizen housing, and apartments. Also, an elementary school, apartments, and equipment rental yard art adjacent to the site in question. A 7 foot block wall currently exists between the storage yard and .he apartments to the rorth. Also, there is a setback of about 30 feet between the apartments and storage yard. The applicant shall be required to shield the ,site in question from the school to the west and equipc7mt rental yard to the east with an 8 foot block wall.. Furthermore, the school �, i PLANNINd COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ; CUP 89-16 --UPLAND MASONRY' i. July;12, 1989 Page 3 `f playground is,, approximately 100 feet frori the storage yard. Cje to these existing and future condi�lops, staff anticipates that adequate mitigation measures hiva�,.ueen placed on this project to alleviate any compatibility problems associated with placing a commercial use adjacent to a residential district. The primary,ar.;t vities proposed to take place at this site are office related, Some equipment and materials are proposed to be stored outside, but no activities related. to the manufacturing of raw materials will take place. 'Furthermore, block wails up to S feet in height are proposed to be constructed along the east and west property lines. A 7 foot clock wall already exists along the north property line. Due to this, staff anticipates no problems related to noise by locating this use within this particular neighborhood. The Development Code requires a total of 18 parking spaces for an office of 1,763 square feet (1 space per 250 square feet), a warehouse of,4,037 square feet (1 space;per 1,000 square feet), plus 6 spaces for a contractor's stoM!!ge yard in connection with a contractor's business. The (`'7oced.-site ANIL plan 'A cates oniy 15 parking stalls, HowevL- r there is enough area to :extend 3 spaces south of the proposed stalls along the west, property line to meet the current parking criteria. Previously, this building was occupied by Bathroom and Kitchen Concepts: a contractor for the remodeling of bathrooms and kitchens. 'rhe proposed use is an office for a masonry contractor: 'Due to the similarities of hours, activities and noise betWeeti the previous and proposed business, staff does not foresee this use as being more intensive than the previous contracting business. The Foothill Fire Protection District will require any proposed tenant improvements to be approved by the District prior to occupancy. C. Environmental Assessmen': Upon review of Part 1 of the Tn—itial Study and comp etion of Part 2 of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related; to a contractor's storage yard locating at this particular location. 1 PLANNING t;OMMISSION STAFF REPORT S� CUP 89-16 - UPLAND MASONq( July 12, 1989 Page 4 i III. FACTS- FOR FINDINGS: The following)/factx� support the required findings, 1. No new structure is proposed. 2. The,proposed masonary'contractor's office. and yard use "> is not more intensive than the previous bathroom and kitchen remodeling contractors office and jaarl. The proposed. nonaconforming use ��ould not occupy any part or the site or. structure' different `'than the previous tenant, nor is the proposed use displacing "any conforming- ,use or altering the pY�operty in a manner which would increase coue'discrepancies. - IV, CORRESPONDENCE-- This item has been advertised -I a public hearing in The IPTY Repoft-newspaper and properly jJstPd, and notices sent to ad acert property",aers;v_ithin.300 feet of the 'project. V: RECOMMENDATION I€ the 'Planni��.j Commission can support the findings,,then approval of th417Conditional f;Use Permit 89-16;! through adoption of the attached Resolution'of'Approval would b� appropriate. If the Planning Comm'^sion cannot Support th necessary findings, then staff should-be directed to prepare Resolution of Denial for adopti bAA A the next meeting. { Resp ally i ed Bra er City Pi nner 88:SH:mlg Attarhments: Exhibit "A': - Location MLLo Exhibit "8" - Proposed Site Plan 1 Exhibit "C° - Letter from Applicant Exhibit I'D" - Floor .Plan Resolution of Approval' r 1l` CA 1 R4lCK*f. i f „�. 10 770 K. 1 p P".2 a 51,5,G /''. �.g,! '�`✓„�-�"'�-ram ; (� �5. •fie. 1 ' Par,3 Pma i�« Ob 10 19 r• ��� 6 .r! NORTH I ITY OF ITIMe 9ANCFO CUC&A.arrIONGA ; Lu�a+,gin, � .. .. PIANNING I I I - I 'Ts SCALE. E.cisr,Yf 7 P.0 hrt.i,bt.afe wMI F ri vnt 6 w 0 a, t a PAm�Oatc 81hryh A l+A �olnn p�rpesad elh,,; $� � 4bak amit Alo¢x wolf ilcmcn►lfa� �=� Z M (+.FJ Tp I. 6+44 .r7..�k•wrr� 6iw:�.a TM Sa/ Area, Et�ydt pnrpc++d °' U 3'6t�i,{(ve(ew411 "1 .at LAaaiealr �y � i ;.9w+otc.-,.�.,r9 ►jj 6 .. V A/I P�rRcn „Ad LrnJSc-p �f + NORTH Cd I Pff 0% ITEM wUr +GALE. 809 N.TURNER N SNUE ONTARIO,(:AUFORNIA 91761 (714)987.2868 t .ICENSE OF448658 May 11, 1989 Original poor Quality City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 attention: Planning Commissi n To Whom It May Concern: As per item 04 of check list or Conditional Use Permit, Non-Construction r the following operations are s follows: 1) Hours of business wi l be,from 7:00 A.M. to 5:00 F.M. 2) Office; to be used fo Administration of General Contractor. MW 3) Offices will be for xsiimat.,rs, clerical help and computer rooms. 4) Office for planroom ,o be used by sub-contractors when taking off plans. 5) Largest amount of employeos could be approximately 16. 6) Average permanent employees ;re 6 people. 7) Storage yard would bo used ..) store scaffoid, jacks, plank, 4 mixers, 2 small trucks, i forklifts, and a bin for sand, gravel, cement and some bri.:k and block. The yard wits be -ept neat and clean -.t all times. Sincerely, Manuel M. Luna President MML/jn RrOF NCHO CUCAMONGA Igo co 047 �. _ y-6ecsS � Pin $GR'F+�7gAw ROOM {{ECepT 1'0:� HAltwq� LpV+) Ci Fi�G. iuhn«Y. Mt]�S Cn++p+�tvR 9 kssk�,h W+m-j 14411 Cen7eFe,�c� �P�G¢, 5T�R N G n � Eia ii I W A RG N4JSe. WA 2E House C %IF ITEM nv RAM"' CUCAMONGA a PLANNING DIVISION 6-s' A F LIT. SCALE: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-16, A CHANHE OF NON-CONFORMING USE, FOR A CONTRACTOR'S OFFICE AND YARD IN AN 'EXISTING BUILDING TOTALING 6,400 SQUARE FEET ON 0.82' ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 OWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHYBALD AVENUE, NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD 'RIGHT-OF'-WAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 202-1.41-12. A. Recitals. (i) Upland Masonry, Inc. has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 89-16 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the,subject Conditional Use Permit request is'referred to as "the application"- (ii) On the 12th of July, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appllrcaticn and concluded said hearing on the. date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and n;solved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as, follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 12, 1909, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 7090 Archibald Avenue with a street frontage of O feet and lot depth of 221.44 feet and is presently improved v'ith a 6,400 square foot building, asphalting and fencing and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south of that site Consists of vacant land, the property to the east is an equipment rental yard, and the property to the west is an elementary school. (c) The project site was previously occupied until on or about j December 31, 1988 by Bathroom and Kitchen Concepts, a contractor's office and yards for remodeling of baths and kitchens. i PLANNING CrISSION RESOLUTiON NO. CUP 89-15 UPLAND MASONRY, INC. July 12, 1.988 Page 2 } (d� The application does not contemplate the construction of any structrives or making any aiterations which would increase the discrepanq.=,f1s__with City codes, nor would the proposed use occupy any part of the site fry structure that was not occupied by the previous use. (e) .''he property has been vacant since on or about January 1, 1989. ` 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comrisision during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the prod'?sed use is in accord with the General Plan, the abjectiVes of the Development C ie, and the purposes of the district in which e site is located. (b) That -the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to tbe, public health, safety,, or welfare, or materially injurinus to proper°:ies " or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provision s,of the; Development Ccde.4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the prn�ect has been reviewed and considered in cutpl_iance with the California Env 'Negative Quality Act, of 1974 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions net Irorth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission Hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth 'below and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division. 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance ` with all sections of the Development Code, and all other City ordinances. 2. If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operztions, including, but not. Limited; to noise, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning r Commission for the consideration and possible AMLI termination of the Use. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N^. CUP 89-16 - UPLAND MASONRY, INC. July 12, 1989 Page 3 ) 3. Any sign proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance, and shall require review and approval by ' the Planning Division prior to installation. 4. The facility shall be operated in conformance with the performance "standards for the Medium'-High Residential Development District, including.- but not limited to, noise levels. S. operating hours for the business shall be 'limited to 7:00 a.m. to 5 00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except on N�fi-ional Holidays. 6. The parking lot area shall be resurfaced and restriped for 18 parking spaces. Said striping shall be double striped per City Standards and accomplished prior to occupancy. 1 I. Additional lamistaping shall be required ors-site as fol%ws; a. One 15-gallon size tree per three (3) parking stalls. U. Additional landscaped planters in'-the parking lot area. A landscape ;plan shall be prepared for review and approval of the Planning Division prior to occupancy of the building. 8. An 8 foot decoraiiva block wall shall be constructed along the east and west property lines. The design of said wall shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to the,issuance of building permits and constructed prior' S occupancy. 9. 0utdaor storage ac't vtties shall be limited tr-small trucks, sand and gravel. All other equipoent ,,:knd materials shall be stored ' within an enclosed building. All sand and gravel stored outside shell be covered as to prevent the material from being blown by the wind onto adjacent properties. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the ,(f adoption of this Resolution. f PLANNING COMMISS'104 RESOLUtION NO. CUP 89-16 - UPLAND MASONnY, INC. 1 July 12, 1989 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF; RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. arty T, CNI-el, MIM11 ATTEST. Bra 'emu r� ecre ar e , Y ;I I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Was 'duly and regularly ntroduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Ri,hcho Cucamonga, at a regular meting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of July, 1989, by the fof,lowing vote-to-wits AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERSs ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ` 0 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORTAft •� JD TE: July 12, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of thePlanning Cortmission FROM: Brad Btiller, City Planner BY: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: EENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COVDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-19 - request stabliSh an arcade in a leasecl space o - BO square feet within,an existing commercial center on 1.26 acres of land in the General Commerc;al District, located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Malvern Avenue - APN: 209-041-51. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a non-construction Conditional Ts-5-75-rmiz tor an arcade, B. Surroundi 12 Land Use and Zonftg: North - 31-nTfam y res en al; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). South - Chino Basin Municipal Water District; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). East - Neighborhood cen#Ar; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). West - Jack-in-the-Box; General Commercial C. General Plan Designations: P'ro ec a Genera I Comnerci al North - Medium Residential South Low Residential East - Low Residential Weser - General Commercial 0, Site Characteristics: The applicant proposes to lease an 850 square Toot spice Arrow Plaza, a 12,895 square foot retail center. The center is presently occupied by the Arrow Plaza Market, ti+ Video Store, as well as the Bit-O-Spice Cafe. In addition, the Chino Basin Municipal Water District is in the process of leasing approximately 3,500 square feet for administrative use. The applicant is proposing to lease the space which is ad3acent to Malvern Avw:ue The Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center occupies the site on the other side of Malvern Avenue. r. T.I F 1 P'�ANNING CONISSIJN STAFF' REPORT R : CUP 89-19 - UNIVERSAL ARCADE July 12, 1989 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations. Arrow Plaza. Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Re iced Provided Bit-O-Spice 1,800 3t100 18 Id Cafe Arrow Plaza 2,700 1/250 11 11 Market H+ Video 1,800 1/250 7 7 Arcade 850 1/250 a 3 Remaining 5,748 1/250 23 23 TOTAL -L,893 (I/10G. 1/250) 52 52 The Universal Arcade is considered a retail use, which requires a parking ratio of 1 stall per each 250 square feet of grass floor area. This parking requirement is within the limits of what is provided on-site.. F. Applicable P? ulations: The installation of d or more amusem5n't oev ces Iv-do, pinball games) within a business is defined as an arcade and requires a Conditional Use Permit per Development Code Section 17.10.030. 11. ANALYSIS: l A. General: The applicant proposes to operate an arcade within an existing commercial center. The proposed use calls for 20 { video games to be operated with tokens within an 850 square foot leased spate. The primary issues related to the establishment; of an arcade are availability of supervisors, safety, and compatibility with surrounding uses. 4 B. Park1nj7, The available parking in the center meets the 4 requ red number per the Development Code. Parts ng should not be a problem for the arcade because it would cater to younger people. Bicycle parking will be required for the site. This could be provided by closing a parking stall and installing a bike rack. A bike rack could also be provided on the eastern side of the building near the electrical transformer. f{ I � i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: CUP 89-19 - UNIVERSAL ARCADE' July 12, 1989 Page 3 C. Foothill Fire and Sheriff's Comments: I. The Foothill Fire District has reviewed the proposed use. They will require re-iew of the Tenant Improvement Plans prior to occupancy. 2. Ths Sheriff's Department reviewed the plans and had several concer:ss .regarding persons loitering around the premises, amount of supervision, bicycle parking, and v, possible fights. The Sheriff's Department suggested that No Loitering signs be posted in front of the arcade, and that the amount of adult supervisors be increased, including a uniformed security guard. It was also suggested that amp'se !gIcycle parking be provided. D. Neighborhood Compatibility: The applicant indicates that persons under in. years or age will not be permitted into the arcade during school hours finless accompanied by a parent or guardian, with the exception of sumer break. This was a concern voiced by the Central School"District.. 'sere is one school located 1°,.s than one-half mile from the sitz, and two others within two mile,;, There are several different uses permitted within the Arrow Plaza Center, but no conflicts have been fore, :en. Current tenants include lip^ Video, the Sit-O-Spice Cafe, and the Arrow Plana Market. Appropriate measures should be to 4n to insure that the nef hboring tenants are not disturbed by the arcade. The wall separating the arcade and the tenant to the south should be designed to eliminate;~r�y concerns regarding noise. The Neighborhood Center to the east does not appear to be a conflict, and the arcade could to a complimentary use to the Center. E. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the nv ronmen a ec s an has determined that the development of this project will not cause significant adverse-impacts. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Derlaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: A. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan and the objectives of the Uvelopment Code as evidenced by the Conditional Use Permit provisions for amusement devices. B. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. � f4 Fes/ J } , PLANNING CO MISSIN-STAFF REPORT RE: CVP B9-19 - U'YIY"RSAL ARCADE" s = ,. July 1Z,, 1989 Page d C. The proposes use complies with each'' of the applicable conditions of the DeVelopment Code. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n Tne Da y_ eport newspaper, property posted and notices sent to all proper y owners and existing tenants within 300 feet of the project. V. nECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Pianr-'ng Commission approve Condit onai Use Permit 89-19 through ation of the attached. Resolution with ',Conditions and Issuance of a -Negati!+e Declaration. Re t ly su d, , . ,y Bra Bit? city ` ,ner BB•SR:ito Attachments: Exhibit "A" = Appl`icant's Description of Arcade Exhibit IV' Vicinity Map Exhibit „C" Site plan Exhibit "D" Interior Floor 'plan Exhibit "E" ie'ter from Central School District Exhibit "f"r'.- Letter from Foothill Fire District Exhibit '/6" - Memo from Sheriff's Department Resolution) `?01,0} v. l f ~ f i BUSINESS PLAN UNIVIERSAL ARCADE DESCRIPTION TWENTY VIDEO MACHINES OPERATION WITH AT LEPST ONE ADU,T SUPER— VISING DURING ALL Wf° 'xG HOURS. MACHINES TO BE OPERATED BY TOKENS EXCHANGED A� _„ r,,4GEMENT BOOTH SET UP IN ARCADE OPERATING HOURS: BUSINESS HOURS TO B� BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 10:00 A.M, THROUGH 11:00 P,M. SUNDAY THROUGH SATUaj)AY, TlITH NO MINORS UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN ALLOWED DURING SCHOOL HOURS WITH IHE EXCEPTION OF SUMMER BREAK. HOURS WILL BE SUBJECT TO CITY ORDINANCES. INTENDED RESTRICTIONS: NO SMV a. NO LOITERING• AROUND FRONT ENTRANCE. NO HORSEPLAY' INSIDF EM'.SES. f OBJE, : PRO IDE A PROFITABLE MEANS OF.ENTERTAINMENT FOR THE HEAVILY POPULATED YOUTH IN THE AREA SURROUVDING THE SHOPPING CENTER AND THE INTERESTED ADULTS WHO• ENJOY THE CHALLENGE OF A VIDEO ARCADE. STtPPORTED BY A STRONG CAST OF SUPERVISION, OURSELVES, AND A CLOSE ASSOCIATE WHO IS EMPLOYED BY THE LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT WHO WILL BE USED AS A SUPPORT MEANS OF AUTHORITY DURING .HIS OFF HOURS. EXPERIENCES WE BOTH H'.VE MANAGED SEV,RRAL OTHER BUSINESSES SUCH AS SERVICE STATIONS,, CONVENIENCE STORES, WHICH OPERATED A SMALL GROUP OF VIDEO MACHINES, AND HAVE.- OWNED AND OPERATED A LAUNDROMAT. I HAVE COACHED JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL BASKETBALL FOR SEVERAL YEARS GIVING ME WHAT I CONSIDER VALUABLE EXPERIENCE IN SUPERVISIOG YOUNG ADULTS. BACKGROUND: WE ARE BOTH STRONGLY ROOTED IN CHURCH HAVIN' STRONG CHRISTIAN CONVICTIONS. WE HAVE CHILDREN OF OUR OWN (BATISTE-TWO, EARL— THREE) RANGING IN AGES FROM ONE THROUGH NINE. WE ARE BOTH STRONG FAMILY ORIENTED MEN OF INTEGRITY', NOTED BY BOTH FRIENDS AND PEERS. Gvi OF ITS : CAP 81-i g ,dMl04egKG RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE--Dr&44,�r,Aw of,Aac4*v*— PIANNING DIVISION _ EXHIBIT Original Puor Quality � l M!f'. itftVl7HUC AHFW� Lr MMY \ ( " I� t ArurFlq� t�sa ttier. ' .i [17le7rc c r t �! ralwv�+�tr �.. �'1ad(+�WPtM �� � I�^w rt11�1MtA4 s1►fFlq` - �TL7 rtA 12F[CT row nNaHr, -- H !It 1 esM \M'wlr:N'. NORF H CITYITEM: GUf 91-t.tf U&1ttj1;rtc-a Axr,&g RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'TITLE: P NING DIVISION _ EXHIBIT: 13 SCALE: Aft Original Poor Quality 'Z�p�•y� . tt" a LL4 1 1 �i.,Pl W !���.I•i�"�1� .:t.w,r.sir sa�i ♦ rf0�:�i ,try.,.,4.�'��,+'� W � ,P,at• ea 'i �, 'i.Ft 1.—.t� t E9• +*'� f �. ...itio•' a � (�1 M_i pwro.t u.}1.irf.S1IrS.�siri> Hai - � f r — %IFStNG rr••��,lei-fie 6/ 4�w♦ ,1' M i. f _ 1�\ �I Y /�.�. !! ur 1 IST� r f e}r•s �1 a .'._t I .. ss Aft ¢ iC4SAA1t�iRRGIGt6. y k t Si:x,r:AWW MIL r.•.: of LLne.IKj1,L r a.w_w%r •.♦ 1 M Ma'JS H1mRA9 YYes 4PRM6 W A S. rw.r.tv • °rwss s, PrC1fi.TH OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITTLE,, L6A) PIS INNING DIVISION F-7 , I 1 a z Z Vk C di , L- sir III � i r- c It a 1 NORTF s � r C1 OF ITEM: .ag ANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLkNNIN DIVISION G'_p EXHIBIT:. SCALE: rS 6entral School District Erwin N.Jones ffiursli i NTeNoeetr 9457 foothill Blvd./Rancho Cucamonga,.{'alifornia 91730/(714)989-8541 hlgm Vogel . . Ai'LT.DURT.�SU31NSS5. RE(;EiVf'®�� S I.Nast OF R!►1'i�1®i�lteA�*W ASST.SUTT.,1NSTRUCTiON of Aiwa , J41i! -7 10 June 6, 198911�12��ii� Mr. Steven Ross, Assistant Planner Community Development. Departmenp P..0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Conditional Use Permit 89-191 ;`:5.versal Arcade Dear Mr. Ross: i am writing on behalf of Central School District concerning the conditional use permit for Universal Arcade. Central School Districts insists that children under 18 are not allowed into the facility unless they are accompanied by,a parent or guardian. Central School District is in support of the permit as`loGg as the facility specifically enforces this stipulation during normal school hours. Thank you for including central School District in the planting of facilities that could potentially impact this district. Sin!?rely, Ingrid Vogel Assistant Superintendent- Business Services J7 `r I IN OF ITEM:(„eta k PLAN ING DIVISION � � EXHIBIT: �G ' PROTECTION DISTR= nc'It'".lt�� P.O.BOX 3S•6623 AMETHYST ST.•RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 a�a1 .•< (714)997-2535 1 June 26. 1939 $i1�11��1IrNt�119� i Steven Ross, Assistant Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O,Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-19 UNIVERSAL ARCADE Dear Steve: Thank you for the proposed site plan for the above bt,:: .tess. If the final space plan remains the same, we will have, the following requirements: 1. Tenant improvement plans must be submitted to the fire department for, ,plan review for the proposed office and bathroom. T*.Te will. be a fee for this service. I T'eritadvu figures determine the occupant load to be 44 persons. Tt would, therefore, not be a public assembly, and state code requirements will nod be applied. 3. Fire extinguishers will be required. The size, amount and locations will be determined when tenant improvement plans are submitted. 4> Care should be taken to provide adequate wall outlets, therefore eliminating the, need for extension cords. Thank you for the opportunity to comment o 4 this project. I look forward to receiving thr tenant improvement constru 3tion plans. Sincerely; Vera A. Arthur Fire Prevention Inspector Cir"V 0 ITEMGu P 82-(q uulruc� l 64 + 'RANCHO A .. 'TITLE: Li,-,rrgn 1 PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT:� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON'GA MMORANDU DATE:: TO: r�.E FROM: _:.Sfb`sr . SUBJECT: �/Inn� r c�d rsbl G�t�l: tr.t e►�w C cr64.•6411) -�u,fy�ksAc f4xcam� L,o,ueaarvs p1bxGCl sU aa#so a w u n�t kr 87aCfr GegS 4olaca �deuus� lty a tno L.+Ft� `+ Lt?p..d tl Lb.-f&A/Uta A",ojd4b IAJ —Zou9 pof9l8f.G F/d-IPTPJ✓y 6t!'y6b.a' �{.If�3 g l OF ITEM:EM: !Q t{uttttLcM. �ltclt RANCHO C 4.J CAMO l 'TI'TLEr PLANNING DIVIsi�N if 'EXHIBIT: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA-PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT t. 'n� 89-19 FOR THE UNIVERSAL ARCADE; LOCATED AT THE';s'oUTHWEST CORNER CF ARROW ROUTE AND MALVERN AVENUE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT,, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-041-5I A. Recitals. (i) Mike Earl and Terrence Batista have fii4d an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use KArmit No. 89-19 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in tl'i�js. Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to ash" 1e application". (1i) On the 12th of,.,July� ,s389r the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a' duly ,11ot?ced public hearing on the appT fation and concluded said hearing on that (iii) All legal prerequisiteS ,to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucaronga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts :4 set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this.Resolution Pe true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 12, 1989, including written rr and oral staff reports, togetler with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows.*. l (a) The aptklication applies to property located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Malvern A����2, APN 209-.041-51 with a street frontage of 485 feet and lot depth &ir e1d.5 feet and is presently improved with an existing commercial center; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a gas station and single family homes, the property to the south of that site consists of the offices of the China Basin 'Munici�ial Water District, the property to the east is the Neighborhood Center, and the property to the west j is a fast food restaurant; and rJ PLANNIM COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE. CUP 89-19 - UNIVERSAL ARCADE July 12, 1989 Page 2 (c) The application contemplates the operation of an arcade consisting of 20 video game machinez;,within an'850 square foot leased space. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific finding, of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, .this Commission hereby finds aid concludes as follows: r (a) That the proposed use is 6,,;'accord,with the General Pia, the objectives of the Development Cod,, and the purposes of the district ip/' which the site is ?ocat-,,d. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimen��l to the public health, safety, or welfare, or material_1y injurious to properties or improvements, in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the,appli able provisions of the Development Code, 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and,. further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative D,claration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,/)this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planning - 1) `No pet-ons, under 18 years of age man: enter, be or remain "in any part of a 9�$e arcade during trio hours school is in regular session. This. limitation shall be prominently posted at the entrance of the facility, in letters not less than 1" in height, and shall be enforced by the adult supervisor, f � 2) The yours of operation shall be no earlier than 10.00 a.m. and no later than 1100 p.m. for arcades located in the General Commercial District. 3) This approval is granted for 20 video game machines. o _ F. PLANNING COMMISSIOIN RESOLIJi'IOM NO. RE; CUP 8949 - 4';`3YERSAL ARCADE July 12, 1985` Page 3 4) Sep—ate public restrooms for ran and women mush'be provided within the apt, aved building and controlled. 5) An frlorior waiting area with seating facilities shall be provided for patron wishing , to relax or wait for an amuss='e device to become available. 6) Change-makirq ,,or token exchange facilities shall be provided for patron use inside premisos. 7) Adequate exterior lighting shall be provided for evening security adjacent to all. entrances and exterior walls of the building where the games are located. All lighting shall be arranged and shielded so as to eliminate excessive glare or reflection onto adjoining i properties or businesses. 8) Access to the game area must be from the main entrance to the primary use and not from a separate exterior entranFe. The rear exit shall be for 'Fire'%Exit Orly". 9) Adequate interior'54ear space shall be provided. for safe and convenient patron circulation and shall meet the {following minimtan standards: (a) Amusement devices shall be located no closer than..,12" fi`pm any wall assembly separating,"the arca�je fron any adjacent building(ar portion Of;a building. (b) provi�a minimum of 60" between amusement devices and any entrance or exit. (c) Where amusement devices are located along one side 'of an aisle, provide a minimukn unobstructed aisle width of 66". Where amusement devices are located along both sides of arty aisle, provide, rovide a minimum unobstructed aisle width of 90"'. (d) Additional interior clear space may be required by the Building Official, Foothill Fire District, or Sheriff's Department in order to maintain public safety, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE CUP 89-19" - UNIVERSAL ARCADE July 12, 1989 Page 4 MP 10) Bicycle racks shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Planner in a location that does not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular circulation. They shall be installed prior to occupancy. 11) All signs on the exterior of the building or visible from the outside, such as window signs, shall, require Planning Division approval in accolitance with the Sign Ordinance. � n 12) No amusement device shall be used for purposes of, or in connection with gambling. The j winning of anything of value shall constitute gambling, except the winning of a prize in a scheduled tournament. 13) No pecsons. shall be permitted to en`er, be or remain in any part of the arcade rthi'r::ir. the possession of, consuming, using or under the influence of any alcoholic, beverage or drugs. This slf'31 be prominently posted inside the arcade in letters not less in height and shall be enforced by the dolt ",tupervisor. 14) The walls, ceiling or floor, or any combination thereof, of the hil'ding o,r structure, or portion thereof, "shall be insulated or otheewise constructed so that no vibration that is detectable without the aid of any mechanical device or instrument will be allowed to be on the outer perimeter of the arcad--. 15) This approval shall become null and void if a Certificate of Occupancy is not issued within 24 months from the date of approval, unless an extension has, been granted by the Planning Conmission. Failure to comply with Conditions of Approval or applicable City Ordinances shall cause the suspension of the Conditional Use Permit and possible revocation of the Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. 16) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code and all other, applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of Certificate of Occupancy is granted. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION $10» RE: CUP 59-19'- UNIVERSAL ARCADE July 12, 1989 Page 5 17) 'tire parking lot shall be posted "No Loitering", id letters not less than V1 in height on .signs to the satisfaction of the City Planner and Sheriff's Department. ' 18) One (1) adult supervisor and one (1) uniformed security guard, 21 years of age or older, shall be provided at al times during husiness hours. 6, The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY, 19$9, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ` Larry 1. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Wier, Secretary ' I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby�,certify t'i,at the foregoing Resolption was duly and. regularly introduced, kssed, and adopted by the Planning .Commission of the City of Rancho Cucam iga, at a ragular meeting of the Planning Commission-held on the 12tn day of July, 1989, by the following Grote-to-wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT`, COMMISSIONERS J — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWMNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 12, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM- Brad Buller, city Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner - 1 SUBJECT: VARIANCE 80-07 - WILLIAM l L':ON, 7COMPANY - A request to :11ow foot g oc; wails wit r�"Iront +and setback area of Etiwanda Avenue, located on the west side of Etiwanda i between Base Line,Road and Highland Avenue APr,*, _227- 1 513-79 and 80, 227-471-61 thru 66, 227-481-66 thru 5C. and 227-491-3 and 53 thru 56. RELATED PILE: TENTATIVE T;IACT 13027 AFD '.;3052 I. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting a 'Variance from the Etiwanda Specific Plan, which does not permit solid walls within the street side setback area along Etiwanda Avenue. 11, BACKGROUND: The applicant has received Plaaning Commission approval. to build 15 single family homes on lots which front Etiwanda Avenue (Tracts 13027 and 13052) and is currently- in the process of constructing the homes. Contrar! to approved plans, the applicant, the William Lynn Companyy has built 5 side yard slump block walls along Etiwanda Avenue which encroach irto the 30 root average, 25 foot minimum setback, as measured from the Etiwanda Avenue right�of-way (see Exhibit "A"); This Variance has been filed to perialt uta walls to remain as built. The reason for the walls, according to the applicant, is to screen the new homes being built from the existing properties along Etiwanda Avenue. III. ISSUES: A. General: The special Etiwanda Avenue street side setback was estaaMshed in the Etiwanda Specific Plan to maintain a r4rai, low profile and open character along Etiwanda Avenue. The ' plan provides for special setbacks along Etiwanda Avenue to en ure this goal. Only open ,"view" fencing less than 4 feet in height is permuted within the 30 feet (average) setback area. B. S eo cif'ic: The walls tend to break�.Mp the streetscape and � � create a "galled-in" feeling which de;eats the purpose. of the.. r I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF 1EPORT VAR 89-07 o WILLIAM LYON COMPANY July 12, 1989 Page 2 ob3ect!ves outlined in the Etivianda Specific,Plan. The walls may also represent a potential t^affic haiard in that they may block motorists' views to the street and bike trail along Etiwanda Avenue. Finally, to complicate matters, the six foot high walls have been placed on top of one to two and a half foot high retaining wails. This situation. makes the walls very prominent features along,:Etiwanda Avenue. IV. {CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Dai_lyRReNrt newspaper ands—public hearing noti64s were sent to al rTip_oper—_ ies within'300 feet of the subject site« V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: - In order to'.apprayo this Variance request, certa n n ngs n the affirmative must be made: i 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would resu'ItL in practical difficulty or-unnecessary physical hardship inoasistent with the objectives of the Development Code. 2, That there' are exceptional or ekitaordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do Alk not apply generally to other properties in the same district. 3. That stric,,; or literal interpretation and enforcement of`_, the,specified regulation would di;prive the applicant of privilieges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. 4. That the granting of the Variancfi. will not constitute a grant of special privilege; inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the'same district. 5. That the granting of the Variance 'will not be detrirneotal to the pub-tic health, safety or,_welfare, or maternal,ty iddrious to properties or improvements in the vi4lnity.-, VI. RECOW.ENDATION: Staff recomm€rds that the Planning-Commission T-;.n—y Va-r-rznce:89-07 through adoption of the attached Resolution. ' l 1 U S` M1 v PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TAR 89-07 — WILLI41 LYON COMPANY F July 1.2, 1989 Pane 3 Resp lly su ted, N Brad ler - City lantier` BB:BH':mlg Cttachment A. Exhibit A�� Location ti on Map Exhibit 1081, - Typical Lot with;Alock Wall Exhibit "G" Variance :Request Letter Resolution of-Denial ,ha _ Ii .r t n :ICY 117ICU VreI.I WW IOwATJ MARMIN vim •�- �.� WE Be law Ave r 'E 'a3 ���lD r Irll Ing . � s Ask r TRAl N EOLWZMAH FE"_ ti i - oar ni f 1i11 ttJ f NEW HOME UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1 &FOOT H GH HL CAbYlRt l.\ON j $ TOP OF F E-TARMS G — ti.' ,i i1J r Ox Tci. EXISTWC RESDENCE OR VACANT PWffA'FY-� 30 FEET SETBACK UNE TYPICAL BLOCK WALL Commak I N)RTH CITY OF ITEM: MARIANCEL L 83.47 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:TXPMAL LOT WITH WALL' PLANNING DIVISION ExImm. - ,SCALE.*E: none GG�/! N YLI L&K LY07-q ea�z�y t/ 040 ARCHIBALD,SURE B,RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730•(7141 980.22d4 3une 28,1984 Brett Horner Planning Department City of Rancho. Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 41:'30 RE: Victoria Ranch Estates Tract 13027-4 Block wars Dear Brettz The William Lyon Company has requested a variance for the -sZx (6) foot high block walls we have built ^'.thin the front yard set backs on lots 153, 154, 155, 156 & The homes which we havo built llong Etiwanda Avenue meet all the requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the City of Rancho look Cucamonga. These homes have greatly enhanced the street scene along Etiwanda Avenue. As you are well aware soma of the existing properties have been there a 'ong tine and are not well maintained,and Could be An existence fcx quite some time. In building these walls si- (6) foot we have tried to screen these very expensive new homes from the existing properties, We feel the homebuyers of Victoria Ranch Estates deserve this small amount of special treatment for their significant investment in the future look of Etiwanda Avenue. If you have further questions or if we can orowide additional information please contact our office. Respectfully, Shari Newman Project Management. Assistans Lnlznd Empire Division REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT JTY OF _.LARIAt RAN ' �+ ' TITLE: RE2 UEST LET DER :�..�, PLANNING DIVIO N SXH1BITn RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CGCAMONGX:PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING VARIANCE "140. 89-07, A REQUEST TO PERMIT 6 FOOT HIGH BLOCK 'WAPLS WITHIN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AREA OF ETIWANOA AVEN�� LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANOA AVENUE BETWEENI BASE LINE ROAD AND HIGHLANDI,RVENUE IN THE LOW;DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKIi� FINDINGS; IN SUPPORT THEW!OF APN: 227-513-79 AND 80, 227-471-61 THRU 66, 227-48146 THRU 66, AND 227-491-03"AND-53 THRU 56, A. Recitals. (i) On April 13, 1988, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 88-68, conditionally approving Design Review for 15 lots within Tracts 13027 and 13052, which included.slump block, retaining walls along, the side property line of certain :Lots (ii) On December 12, 1988, the Planning Division inspected said lots and issued a Correction Notice to the William Lyon Company regarding the construction on non-conforming six (6) foot nigh walls on top of the retaining walls on certain lots within Tracts 13027 and 13052. This non-conformity was further identified by letters feom the Planning Division to the developer dated March 8, 1989 and April 28, 1989. (iii) On June 23, 1989, the William Lyon Company filed an application for the issuance of the Variance,No. 89-07 as described in the t• title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, ; the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application". B. Resolution. " NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 'I 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,- Part A, of this fi_esolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission r during the above-referenced public hearing on July 12„ 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to existing slump block walls located on property on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue between Base Line Road and Highland Avenue with a street frontage on Stiwanda Avenue which is presently improved with hcmes.under construction; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO VAR 89t,07 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY 4 July'12, 1989 Page 2 (b) The property to the north ,r the subject site is. residential property, the property to the south of that site consists of vacant land, the property to the east is singld family residenti,a-" and the property to the test is single family residential. (c) The request is inconsistent with the Etiwanda specific Plan (Section 5.31.302B), which does. not permit solid walls within the Etiwanda Avenue street side setback area. (d) That granting of the request may increase motorist, pedestrian, and equistrian.sight visibility problems along"Etiwanda Avenue and complicate traffic safety conrsiderations. (+) That the walls detract from the ru••al, open appearance of the exii�*ing,.rtiwanda Avenue streetscape as well as the future streetscape as described Yn,.the Etiwanda Speci€i.c Plana 3. Based upon the substai;tial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and: upon the specific findings of Pacts set forth in parigraphs,I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and- concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal interpr6 ation and enforcement of the specified regulations would not result in pwactical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code: (b) That there are not exceptional or extraordinary-circumstances or conditions applicable to the propo-rty involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to 'other, properties in the same district. (c) Tnat strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the s9ecified regulation would, not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting of the Variance will: constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on 'other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting,of the. Variance will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set firth in paragraphs 1 2, and 3 above, ;this .Commission hereby denies the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VAR 89-07 WILLIAM LYON COMPANY July 12, �!!q Page 3 If � APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH 'JAY OF ZULY, 1989, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Carry T. McftieT, ZhairmF ATTEST: Brad. Oul I er, ecretary Y, Brad Buller, Secretary;of the Planning Commission of the City of, Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing .Resolution was dulu and regula ly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the - City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the. Planning Cormilssion field on the 12th day of July, i989, by thejollowing,;vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONEPS: ' >> NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSt `s. j if ;7 1 -f t 4; J i — -�--- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT T DATE, July 12, 1589 TO; Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Plan nar BY: Beverly. Nissen, Associate Manner SUBJECT: ERVIRONMEhTAL ASSESSMENT AND "VENTATIVE TRACT 14139 _ AHMANSON i A reSidentIRI Su v S on o'`119 Single am y lots on W. acres of land in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Wwanda Avenue and 25th Street - APN: 225 O82-01t I'. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. fttion Requested: Approval of the subdivision map, concontual gra ng plan, and issuance of a Negative Declaration, B. Protect Density. 2.25 dwelling units oczr acre. C. Surrounding land Use and zoning: North` - but Corriope and vacant; PUB (County,of San Bernardino) South - Tract 13527; Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - i'atant, Res 2 (County of San Bernardino) West - SCE Corridor si.d Vacanta; PUB (County of San Bernardino) il. General Plan Designations: eo ec. fte --UW e-s reefftfal (24 dwrelling,.:cn is per acre) North - PUB (Fublictt County of San Ber,6rdino South ., lzw ResiOent—,"J' (2-4 dwel'jing j,nitS per acre) East - Res 2: county of San Eernar;�-no West - PUB-(Public).- County of San Oernardi'no S. Site Characteristics: The pry-' 1 is currently vacant, With an average slope at 'percent _-«gin north to south. The tract is bordered to the east by Etiwanda Avenue, to the south by approved Tentative Tract 13W, to then west by a Southern California Edison Company easement, and to the north by 25th Street which will ultimately be vacated and a SCZ easetment. r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: TT 14139 - AHMANSON July 12, 1986 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS• A. Back round.: The 54-acre site is currently located within the 1 y o ancho Cucamonga In the Lott Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre). The City Council approved a.Pre-Zone Application, Development Agreement and Annexation Agreement on November 16,.1988. The Development Agreement was approved with a maximum density of 2.25 dwelling units per acre even though the site is 'actually jesignajed Low Density Residential (2.4 dwelling unit?;-,,per acre) 1 B. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 119 single (amity lots ranging in size from 9,339 to 30,435 square feet with an average 1,ot size of 13,874 square feet. Both the minimum and average lot sizes considerably 6�ceed the minimums pernmitted within the Low Density Residential District which are 7,200 and 8,000 square feet respectively: Paseos/greenbelt trails have been provided in certain locations within the subdivision to: provide a trail connection'- to Tract 13527 to the south. In addition, access points have been provided across to the north and i;est trad't`boundaries 'to provide connections to future potential dev�lo nt within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan area C. Traits Advisory Committee: 'The Com:nmittee originally reviewed Ve—project on Novemoer 16, 1988 and did not rec;oav; nd approval due to the following concerns: C 1. The proposed location of the paseo trails xrrQeared to be predicated on a particular subdivision design Which was arrived at prior to the paseo requirevz t. The 'Trails Committee felt that the design <tnd layout of the subdivision and the trail system should be developed in concert to provide a trail system which: a) Provides logical pedestrian linkages throughout ia-a subdivision which connect all parts of tNgQ project, supplements the parkway system and further unifies the project; and b) Provides connections to the north and west tract boundaries, as well as to the south and possibly Etiwanda Avenue. The applicant then revised the plans and the Committee reviewed the project on Marsh 15 1989 The Committee recommended approval subject to the following conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: TT 14139 AHMANSON July 12, 1986 �j Page 3 1. An 8-foot wide sidewalk should be provided within the paseos. 2. , The paseo between Lots 54 aild 55 should be omitted. 3. A paseo connection should be provided to the site to the south. 4. An enhanced parkway treatment should be,�provided along Streets "A", "D", and "F"> Final desigir to be reviewed by the Committee prior to recordation. D. Design Review Cornfittee• The Design Review Committee (Emerick, MccNiel, rou• initially reviewed the proposal on March 30, 1989. At that.time, the Committee did not recommend appraral and advised the applicant to make the following revisions: 1. The width of the paseos, particularly Lots A and 8, should be increased to 30 feet. Nowevpr, the width may vary. 11 2. The :-;msonry,,all on either side of the paseos should not extend to the curb. Wrought iron railirtf-;;gay be used to define the paseo if desired. 3. The connection to Etiwanda Avenue should be maintained to provide a connection,to the proposed Community Trail on the east side per the';City`s General Plan. 4. the perim3ter wall desigd-for 'Etiwanda Avenue should be revised to reflect the proposed des4n scheme outlined in tho Etiwanda North Specific;Plan. 1 5. A paseo connection to Tract 13527 to the south should ae in between Lots 13 and 14. Steps can be utilized if necessary. 6. Bridges should be provided across the proposed drainage t channels along the north and west tract boundaries. The bridges should be of permanent materials and designed to be strong enough to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian traffic only. 7. An enhanced parkway should be provided on one side of Streets "A", "D", and 7". The parkway may contain additional street trees, shrubs and/or groundcaver. This area yi11 be homeowner maintained. 14 -5 r Pl,ANmIm COWISSION STAFF REPORT RE; TT 14139 - AHMANSON dc,ly 12, 1986 Page 4 i The applicant revised their plans and the Committee (Finerick, Blakesley, Kroutil) approved the project on April 20, 1989 subject to the fallowing conditions* 11 The design of the perimeter wall along Etiwanda Avenue, as well as the streetscape should be designed in conformance with policies and standards set forth in the proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan, Drawings should be reviewed and a);nroved by the Design Review Committee l' prior to the recordation of the tract imp. 4 2. A temporary fence, such as chain link, should be placed across the paseo connection to Tract 13527 to the south until such time as that tract develops. 3. The enhanced parkway treatment along Streets "A", and Vu should be re-designed to include a double row of clustered trees, The design should be reviewed and aparoved by the Design Review Committee prior to the recordation of the tract map, 4. The ownership of the slope located along the south tract boundary should be transfor.,ed to the southerly property owner prior to recordation rf,the map. If this is not feasible, an exclusive yard-easement or soma other acceptable mechanism should be agreed upon prior to map recordation. Installing gates in the wall to provide for homeowner iacess is not considered to be an acceptable solution. 5.. Masonry walls along the paseo edges should be provided and should be terminated at the setback line. Some type of tow visual barrier may extend to the curb where appropriate, The Commission should note that the Trails. and Design Review Committee have provided differing recommendations regarding a paseo trail connection to Etiwanda Avenue. The Trails Comittee felt that the paseo connection between Lots 54 and 55 should be deleted since this would encourage unsafe, mid hittk crossings. The Design Review 'Committee, however, recommeroled that the paseo/trail connection to Etiwanda Avenue be maintained since it would provide a connection to the proposed Community Trail (bicycle and equestrian) along Etiwanda Avenue, which is indicated in the City`s General Plan. If the trail is required, staff would recommend that a parkway strip be provided between ,toe sidewalk and the street, as opposed to running the paseo sidewalk all the way to the street as shown t V4 PLAN!?LING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: TT 14139 - AHMANSON July 12, 1986 Page 5 on Exhibit "D-2". I Should the Commission decide the trail connection to Etiw mda Avenue is not needed, planning Condition No. 6 on the attrched Resolution of Approval should be deleted or modified. E. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee revKwed the project on April 4, 1589 and May 2, 1989. Approval was delayed until: 1. Off-site easements were obtained, 2. Lots D and E were revised to accommodate City maintenance vehicles, and 3. The preliminary design of interim storm drain facilities was deemed acceptable to Engineering. The project was approved with a cd ition r<dded by the 'Foothill Fire District regarding Mello-Roos requirements. F. Grading Committee- The Grading Committee initial'.y reviewed e project on April 3, 1989 and did not approve it due to concerns regarding extensive cross lot drainage and the proposed utilization of privafA. enclosed conduit drainage systems. The gra(rng plan was revised to generally limit cross lot drainage to single lot systems and again revived by the Grading Committee on hay 1, 1989. At that the time, the Committee opted to defer either recommendation of approval or denial of the plan in order to allow the planning Commission to review two grading options which wculd involve either rear and cross lot drainage or drainage to the front of each individual lot. The proposed plan utilizes both styles of grading. Option 1: Rear lot/cross lot drainage. As is typical in this portion or the Lily,to app can was directed to prepare grading plans that held the height of tract boundary cut and fill slopes to approximately 8 feet. They were also directed to generally conform to the slope of the exitting terrain (generally 7%). The rrsult of this direction is a project which has rear 'lot and cross lot drainage. This could result in maintenance and nuisance conflicts between neighbors, as well as a requirement for unsightly surface drainage facilities that woulJ be necessary. The main area of concern is the southerly tier of lots where a surface channel would run %n an east/west direction and would he placed in a private drainage easement. This channel would collect the drainage From tw Plt,;.;:ING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: TT 14139 - AHKANSON July 12, 1986 Pa9e b abutting northerly lots and convey it to acceptable disposal points in the streets and paseas cf Tract 13627 to the south. Additionally, the east_- 1y 10 lots in the southern tier must drain from west to east and outlet onto Etiwanda Avenue.; Staff's concerns are generally related to li-,,.11ity problems regarding this open drainage facility since it would be homanwner-maintained, which typically results in poor maintenance. Other facilities, such as a south boundary flood wail could be installed to furnish a drainage area that -,-,,;Id be grossly oversized in the hope that even withput mainte:,. xe, a drainage way with acceptable cross-sectional area would remain intact. The :draft Hillside Development Regulations would allow cross lot. drainage only if maintained by a Hems-owner's Association and the drainage device'olaced within a minimum 18-foot wide easement. Option 2- Front-lot drainage. Tha alternative to cross lot d`raa rag: would be to re-design` the grading plan to re-direct drainage to the fronts of the lots. Interior rear yard slope and retaining wall combination heirints of generally 12 feet between lots could have to be utilized in order -,; accomplish this. This solution, however, requives that the rear portion of the southerly tier V lots be elevated which could result in 16-foot to 18-foot higty slopes adjacent to the south tract boundary (assuming the Tact to the south matches natural grade). Tiered retaining; falls with dense landscaping could be required to soften the apue;,rance of the slope. T., T:,.,zect this subdivision fr flooding, open: trapezoidal channels will be const.^acted along the west,,,rly and northerly tract boundaries (see Engineering Conditions #12 and #13). G. Environmental. assessment: In completing the Environment ecc E:, s & was ,n ormed of the school district impaction issue. A candition has been placed on this project which requires the applicant to consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Foos Community Facilities District. With this being included' as a Condition of 4proval, staff feels that a Negative Declaration can be issued for to project. 111. FACTS FOR FINOI!'GS:. The project is consistent with the General an a a eve opment Code. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will not be dear!mentai to the public health or safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the applicaSle provisions of the Development Code and City Standards, It iW PLANNING COMMISSION ST*F REPORT RE: TT 14139 - AHMANSON July 12, 198E Page 7 Iv. CORRESPOWENCE: This item has bee;: a46rtised in The Daily Report newspaper as a public hearing, the•s to posted. an notices sent o all property owners within 300,,,,fret of the site. j V. M:Ot MENDATION: Staff recommends 'that !tne Planning Commission rev iV t5ie grading options and provide policv-`*direction. If -the Comission can support the proposed rear' lot/cross lot: draining concept, then tapproval through adoption of the attached Resolution � would be ap ropriateo If the Commfrsioa cannot support the proposed yradi"ng and drainage concept, then the project can be continued, with the applicant's come nt, in order to revise the p1,(i for review'by the Grading: ,d.,,Design Revieq ConihiWtees. R tfully i u1 e City P1 nne► BB:3N:ko Attachnierts: Exhibit "A Site Utilization lap Exhibit "Br - Tentative Tract heap H 4 EExhibitl C , ConceptUal cradingPian (With Back/Cross lot Drainage) Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan E)rhlWt "E" Grading Plan Section; - Option 1 E'Ahibit "P'" Grading Plan Section - Option 2 Resolution of-approval with Conditions Original Poor Quality t 4 AI- t �, I ►--- ip t � .Q� is , r `� `•` t GI- 1771` '~ Ifp 8'+ 1;01•'� '���Sib' ��rr\�� ••Z - - ID oi ,. Intl of , l� s (, a.Ipj�•� 1� sof p �0 r' L � 1.. r Ir ems• ''1{•, � i f f1 I �i r^� ��` j RANCM �M�,N � TITLE: 1 2 L� 7�?.�7d}'? ? i I Original Poor - .�'✓� y �,� •. /. ".�,. �F V ,,,,-s,';�'•" � -ray. �,,.:`�M _G ArAdIL ..4b �s�'�'! w.'� �� �� �«ram►• y r � o - o Fes_ o 0 I ' NM.*H CITY OF MEM: Jrr39 RA CLCL TITLE � ' diet �G�'�`mao K ANN[W D(VN M EXHIBIT: a SCALE' RAH CUCAMONGA Tom. i PLANNING DIVISION EcH[Ewr: / scatx:�. 1 J I. � t .\ •Rr t 11i. � 1 R NN cu CL cts _ 1 �y;.-s��S � �-.���. {4' .•bib/ e w "•a lam+ �' •_- O..�..•— ' ' 1� OF O l 't •� �-;� Y •hl x 11 ;I�� may, �. � ,.•. �.- �i •���.), ray,- 'y MANNING DIVLSIC N ��f:3��tIIET['= SCALE -T' ----1 11, �'•l••.,N� ,}• p � / cam \\`mot `� .. � pi t 1 a4 ! Y t a� r� - •� I., 1 a ITEM- RANCHO CLJCA _ TITLE: PLANNING D€VL90N EXHIBIT- * ` SCALE- - -� -ice y Al p" I �A 33, �a ++ tttn Lo Ito r. At P1i ,. ,, ,��-�. C". �t la ' � � lR r' i �1 "X pp Q !� C: +r, ® �� . .�.. .F � � ��. > �3._�+ y b�, Q '� 4��Y{jw��y� ?n �. �. � - y5. u D � �y ! i� � � > A �� � ■` i 4�i t�t i �� {q� ** '+'etc� 1 © '� �o �y:, ,Mr+^�. �,: e _ 9T Lp �.w is � o J1`R ��d r � d it - �� # Y:, v7 r.:'. i1 S'' I, � � x :� L '� �� . a1, _ ti D �� '� ��'. ,6F ,.?s*' .f5s `-+t% ,�, ":��>y r ;a�.. y.,� ,� b��'...r»t;. � ' r..' ..r .:�, . � �. } �' � ��� i1'. ,��/ ��`.� i _ ��': t � ��,�%d ,�' 4 s4 1. _ � 4 p � , � a, ►ti'_ _' �� �� � iI � a i ti� ® Ti i� ,'� .1 ,'\,� *'K\ � �\� � ,� a '( �: a ', � 4 tom. yak / o�• aYYYJ. 7 �. �� p�`+ i� �.�. � .. ' � AJS~ � R s � � sr��y � ':i .:. a :� � �.�! .ate .��, >`�. a" y �• �j '�f� ,� %r �. ' a .. • ,, I a r o � m a r M tC1 w � 1 Y r art. , S{ CITY OF RANCF 3 CUB TUTU- KAMIhG DiVEM EX#iIMTI— �.,.4 SCALE- 0 Z r i 'M t � 1 � t 5 s J L. sutg 1 0 a 0 t J t' 1 d 4 r� t 'CITY CF ,,/�� �M° � y , CW EXHIBIT-SCALE- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAr"*,HO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14139, A RLSIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 119 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 54 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 25TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-082-01 A. Recitals. (1) Ahmanson Developments, Inc.. has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14139 as described in the t'tle of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this. Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is refarred tows "the application". (ii) On the 12,th day of July, 1989, tte Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonqi conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded",;: aid hearing on that date, (III) All legal pi`,erequisites to the adoption of thl. Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Manning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. 'Znis Commission herby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and corre;t. 2. Based upon substantial evidence pres^nted to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July Ief 198D, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property. located at the southwest corner of Fitiwanda Avenue and 25th Street with a stvaet frontage along Etiwanda Avenue of approximately 1,,350 feet and lot depth of 1,005 feet at the north, tract boundary and 2,400 feet at the south tract boundary; and (b) Tha property tit the east of the project is designated for residential use and is currently vacant, the property to the_south of the project is approved Tract 13523 and the property to the north and West of the project is an SCE corridor and is currently vacant; and (c) llie project, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, complies with all minimum developm-int standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and k PLANT N% COWISSSON RESOLUTON W. RE! Tr 14139 - AHMAIIS04 July 12, 1989 Page 2 (d) The development of 119 single family lots on 54 ricres is consistent with the approved Development Agreement. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative: tract is consistent with the General Plan,. Development Code, and specific plans, and (b) The design ar improvements of the tentative tract is consigid., with the General Plan, Davelupment Code, and specific plans; and proposed; and (c) The site is physi ally suitable for the type of development (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The te'r,,\tative tract is not likely to cau!•* serious public health problems; arid: (f) The decig'p of rho.,tentative yract will not conflict with any ease;nont acquired by the pubii:.j at large,,;-rco; of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds Fr' ;-.4,tifies tha7. the project has been 'reviewed and considered in compliancel? -,Lh the California Environme.ttal Quality Act of 1970 and, further, t1-s Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings a!,' conclusior;s set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission heh�y approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division. 1) The design of the perimeter wall along Et-iwanda Avenue, as well as the streetscape shall be desi,ned in conformance with policies and standards set forth in the proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan, Drawings shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to the recordation of the tract. map. 2) A temporary fence, such as chain link, shall be placed across the. paseo connection to Tract 135,27 to the south until such time as that tracr develops. PLANNING CO MISSIOR RESOLUTION NO RE; TT 14139 -AHMANSON July 12 1989' o Page 3 3) The �Aanced parkway tretatMent along Streets "A", "D", and "F" "shall be re-designed to include a double row of clustered trees. The design shall be reviewed and approved t by the DAsinn Review,Committee prior to the recordation of the tract atop. 4) The "owkrehip oF, the slope locates; aloac the south tract boundary shall ke transferred to the southerly property corner prior- to recordation of the map. If this is :tot feasible, i, an exclusive yard easement or some other accepta4?4 mechanism should be agreed. upon prior I to map reoeo,a ton. Installing gates in the wall to provide fcr ;:_-gowner access is not -Considered to be rn acceptable solution. 5) Masonry walls alor_g the pase;; edges shall be provided and s.iall be to minatcd at the front yard setback line. Some tyoe i0f low visual barrier may extend to the curb where appropriate. 6) The pasEo connection to Etiwanda Avenue shall be maintained to provide a con;;ection to the prcpoled Commuaity Trail. However, a parkway strip _shall be provided betw��Fn thy, sidewalk and the street to discourage mid-blo:k crossings. 7) Prior t the recordation ov the final map or the issuance; o; building peni4ts, whichever coiaes first, the applicant shall consei.1; to, ar-,participate in, the establishment of a Mel lo-Roos•Co nity Facilities District pertaining to the �~ projact site,to provide in co junction with the applicable School District for the conAtruction and maintnance of ne assary school facilities. However, 'if any SchbA Oistrict has previou ly established such f� Community Facilities District, the applicant shall,' la the alternative,' consent to the annexe*inn of the pro4=ct site into the territory oil such exisi,_j )istrict prior to the recordation of the final map or tW_ issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affect School District iias not fermed a Mello-Foos Cozanity Facilities District within twelve months, of the date of approval of the project and prior to the resonation of the final map or issuance of bui'lding permits for said project, this conditioek shall he deemed mull and void. d) TRa developer shad provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Strec�Rock Crusher project prior to ° acKx,pt ng a deposit on any property. U , PLANNING COMMISSION,RESOWTION NO, ` RE: Ti 14139 - AHMANSOtt a auiy 12, 1985 Page 4 f' 9) The developer shall commence,; participate in and concurZ4t,,;e, or cause to be commenced, participated in, or •. consummated, a,tdello-P.00s Community Facilities District for Foothill Fire Protection'District to finance.,a fire station to serve the deve'`opmert, including hind facilities, equipment. and operations, and maintenarce.. Tht-: station shalt be located, eesig,ted and built to all speci'ficaticns of the Notbilt, Fire.Protection District, and Shalt become the DiWict's propert,` upon completion. The equipment shaft be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of the station, developer shall comply with all applicable laws, and regulations. The Community Facilities District shall be formed by Distx ict and developerbj`�,the time of reco.11ation of tha finai map', 10) The private drain%o 'easement along the south tract bois.idary shall be a pinitiam width of 13 feet. I. . 11) Prior to accepting a deposit on any property, they developer shalt provide each prospective buyer written notice of Ue following: a) The, pasecs trail system consists of public treils linking neighborhoods and provid'?ti access to the Community and Regional Trail syst� ya "0 street is intended to b?' ugh street which will ultimately extend to th .__ autn to connect with i future subdivisions. Engineering Division 1) Etiwanda Amnue shall he coeistructPd full:width south of its southerly intersection with "A"' Street to lath Street and half width f:ol_, "All Street north to the center of the SCE:def r ighe.d _W until'4V.elopmenbt of th�ay improvements may. Ise p ,) property to the south. Pa,; ;gay improvements s` ?1 be provided on the west side of j :ttianda Avenue north -or 'zhe project site. The :developer J may requeai, a,reimbursement agreement to recover the coast of constractior south of the south project boundary from future development as it occurs. 2) Twe0ty ourt (2a.th) Street shall be co,�ttructed full width (except: for parkway improvements snd�median landscaping) Pram i-i<s A te�;ection with Etiwanda Avenue (existing) to 'ip°t lion with Etiwanda north of- 24th,; ?he 1V request a reimbur�seferot agreement to recover K cotnstructicn, froth future development zi it +i7Ct,rj ..a. r) e t PLANNING "0*40ISSI6N ACSDLUIbN No RE: TT 14139 - AHMANSONf July 12, 1989 Pag(t 5 i 3) Etiwandk Avenue, between f4th Street and Highland Avenue,(' shall be upgraded. ineluding surfacing and an .adequate structural Section 32 feet wide, to the Satisfaction,o° he City Erigiheer.x 4) Landsa-aPe maintenance easements shWL Abe dedicated to the area bi',,tween the perimeter wall 4rrd the right- for Et-Wanda Avenue. . 5) Landseaprifi'and wall heights within thelines of sight for all, intersections shall be lim°ted as required by the City T fi;r En e er, 6) EtiWanda A.4enue may tranOtion to, a 44-foot curb width within ;,(;,66-foot right-of-way north or "A" Vreer, if verified,h'.� a.traffic impact study subject to the approval of thefCity Engineer (minimum .p6einent width of 26 feet within j 40-foot dedicati:ln). 7) Permits 4,111 be required from the following agencies for work within their rights-of-way:' a) San hernariino County -flood C:ntroi Distric`, b) So_�)thern California Edison Company for ttie construction of EtiwMida Avenue, and c) Metropolit:an Watet District for tyre construction, of 24th Str�ei�. 8) A hciie wner's association shall ae re5ponsible for the maintvmce of the drainage and landscape 4asements along the sodth tract boundary 9) Construct the City Master Plan Storm Drainage Facilities listed below: a) A trrpezoidal channel alosig the north property line, b) The facility for, crossing underneath Etiwanda Avenue, and c) The 24th Street storm drain to the Etiwanda Spreading F' Standard drainage fens for the site small he .credited to that =portion of , the construction costs incurred in con�truuting perma6i nt df3iwsge facilities gpecifixd on the Gity's piaster Plan' of storm drains and the deveTopr shall eligible for reimbursement of allowable costs in excess t 1r✓ PLANNING C0MMIS$IgR i iS6LUTION.NO ?) RE' TT 14139 - MMAN$QN JU;J 12, 1989 _ Page 6 of the fees.in acr..crdance with City policy.. Any additional costs , for over-sizing facilities,; for inte.,1% flood protection shall 'be brrne by the deve'tooar. 10) Construct an interim retention basin within the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds to mitigate increased flows at the•outlet of the 24th Street starm drain. °f 11) plans for the 24th Street Master Plan. $torm Or-)in and ? interim retention basin shall be approved by Ue City Engineer and the Flood Control District prior to approval of the Final Map or issuance of building permits r titaicheVer occurs f=rst. 12) Construct - interim storm drainage facility to receive flowlI'from ,.e trapezoidal channel along the north property vine" hick 'dnea:one of the following. The Anterim,fIaeility steal! be~designed to tiie sati5facti6n of the Ci4_EVgin4or. a) If easements are obtained: from the property owner(s) to the east .,an ;nterim channel may be'extended either to tPie existing Swale 15.0 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue or ail the way to th,-s Etiwanda Spreading Grounds, with velocity dissipation facilities east :of Fliiwanda Avenue& b) if off-site easen+ints are not obtained, construct a debris basin on-st"ta with an inlet structure from the trapezoidal channel and an outlet , structure which JJ disc"r5es to the storm, drain in "All Street. Downstream local and master plan storm drain facilities shTl'f, be up-sized as needed. Interim access to the pent,;neat c,.dnnal access road ,halt be provided from "A ' Street without crossing the flow path. A mairtanance agreement shall be exacutsd to the sati-*faction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guarzntesiq private maintenance of the interim facility, but iroviding the City _with the ;right of access to maintain the facility-,if private maintenance . i;, insufficient, and allowing the City to assess arose .costs to the developer. The devslotor shall be responsible f.— removing the interim -facility and completing the trapezoidal; channel at such tier as tre interim facil-feles are na:tonger needed, 1311 A permanent trap<zoidai channel shall be constructed along, the west property boundary, adjacent to thy;, Southern California Edison corridor' and extended: scutK.tterly to the end of the 24th Street master plan storm drain line. A desilting basin Shall"#,'"constructed at the inlet to the . PLANW..G COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ,ram -RE: Tl,'14139 - AN14ANSON July 12, 1989 Page 7 storm. drain. The developer mry request a reimbursement agreement to. recover the cost of constructing facilities ,south of the project's south boundary from future development of the adjacent pr perty as it occurs. } 14) Both trapezoidal channels . hall be contained within permanent storm dran age easeOnts. A 15-foot wide paved access 'road shill be constructed on the downstream. side (south and east) of the channels for their entire length, with access at both ends°to a�public "street. The channel shall be fenced on the upstrea . sides. There shall be no public access to the channel a cess roads. The 'developer shall form or annex to a Main nance 4ssessment District for these facilitief_ 15) Pede#riar. bridges shalt be constructed `across the trapeA*,oidal channels to align with ,Lots D and E. The bridges shall be designed to preclude pedestrians using the Echannel access roads, to the„ satisfaction,, of the City ngineer. 15) The project shall contribute to the future'construction of the Etiwand.a/San 5evaine Regional drainage/Fiobd. Control Facilities b i'orm i n' or a nexi`rl --t �y 9 n o a benefit : , s g asses ^:en.. AML or s Community Facilities District or by the •payment elf, region41 drainage fees as established by the City Council: Formation or annexation`er fee payment shall ;be prior to the Final Map,approval. 17) It shah be the Developer's responsibility to have then current FIRM Zone (A, 8, or 0) designation removed from the project area. The Developer's En�,Jtteer shall prepare all necessary reports, pilns„r hydrologic/hydraul!t calculations,etc. Preliminary approval. shall be obtained from FEMA prior to approval of the recorded: map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, The designation shall be officially r_moved prior to bccupalcy or improvement_acceptance, whichever occurs first. 18) If the project 4;s to be developed in plisses, each S individual phase shall be designed to provide maximum public safety, convenience for public service vehicles, and proper traffic circulation. In order to meet this requirement, thA following will be required prior to- the finalization of any phase: a) Completion of the improvenz at plans``for:-the total project or sufficient plans beyond the phase boundary to verify, the feasibility of the design to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE:. TT 14139 AHMANSON July 12, 1989 Page 8 bS' A "plan shall by submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Division, Fire, : and Planning Departments indicating what improvements will ..be constructed with the'"given phase,. :,subject to ' the following; (1) street; improvements beyond 'the pha s :�7andaries, as necessary to 'provide secondary accers,. (2) _ drainage facilities, 3och as sir^rir, drains, channels, earth beans, and blc k, aalls, as necessary, to protect the development from off- site flows, (3) a properly designed -��itar system capable_ of providing .required firt, i'low, perhaps, loop.;ig or extpriding beyond the ph ,?se boundaries,_-. '(4) easoments for any of the above and the ini allation of Necessary utilities, and (5� phal�e 1.oundaries shall correspond to the tot linef; shadn on the approved tentative map. 19) Lots D and �� shall be designed to accomno6,te maintenance vehicle ac96ss tr, the channel. access l,\oad to the sacisfaction'of`the City Engineer, 20) The Dewelopor shall make a 'good Faith effort tb1 coordinate the alignment of Lot F with a paseo in TentiWtive Tract 13527, which n:ay require re,Yfising the location di, Lot F. 21) The south half of 2eth Struc!t shall be vacated. 22) Cross-getter 'shafil die elimanated '1f 'storm drains are available at an intersection. 4. Thu Sectetary to this Commission shall certify to the`'adoption of this [resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS l'TH DAY OF JULY, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE £1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: . Larry T. McNiel, rman PLANNING COMMISSION"9ESOWTION NO.: RE: TT 14139 - AHMANSOF! July 12, 1989 Page 5 ATTEST: ra '8 'fu leer e�ary . I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Conclusion or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby"certify .tha'c the, foreg-A >�R"Asolu;,9att was ,.duly and , regularly introduced, passed, and adopted c the PI'anni,ng Comni�s an of the 11+; -.. City of .Rancho Cucamangay ct a regular nedting-Cti the`ftiazin "q.Cep t,sior_n ld . on the 12th day:of July, 1984 by tha follpwing vote.-to-wit,' AYES: COMMIS'SICNERS" NOES: COMMISSIONEfiS: ABSENT: COMUSSIGNERS: AOL T t �� ` all> 4 q ��vN V ulA.YY "vYN Sm ¢■.yL.w�����'��y�: t�.C��OCq°V' �.�3 Qp4��°Y�a .'gate+� 9v'�A'��l �y d �'CO_'"�a=i�Y L 4 �•Oii�VO a3� A���ap . uTpa ����® I •. 'YY- Y t ss A C Y L " YY �N p:�Yy �1 y A"+. t v " P�p g 4ti1�pO O� Y Ye c1'i MY 24 �CG� �, WOc GQ 34 .22t.; q yArw.. I Ss 4 pH Y V.3A O �~Yts `O G�+ f� Y u�C CV _AP■yM pY+''tl�.. �w Maepp a.L w �" yO.A A i. 3 GGYV -fu 'Co t+ a6.Cla�4g vtSs�w NNC Y�O aL. ao��. Yi M _ W M'i •a i.O AY �i®��� � g-r-g w� x4 Vs tt 1. yT f �i fJ �l'L rh '- 0 Vy R y td 4 r m le x w �IM 111 K Y g q �$#� 3��'8. e■a�itoM,�"ewc g`.�3.4.8� ��0 7 is I off» w LY �iiAO p+�y"a ONs �w HAM pQppS tlY {�y yGOY N NF N y I"� `V H' t N M Y N 21 Y S. M tt 3 N. GYY� V$�w V N.I" '. +MNMM oLy'0. x M v C o y o. y Q i:"� tl1 wO.�O L C v =OO bt t Y 'aMi yO Gys 4" w pC y y� `; N+jA ..fig. caq 51 f r?ss yA "v'.S asN6 •p' �'" �,yf y.q c? aL�g N« �wCY15 O YJC�YYL�M L L6 p^ tly� if �. �If{yY yN.0 V .Cal V r`11 N M ' a Y Y q 1, � •� Cs.JV iT�'w "CCs j S o� i.: ao.. �s ueaY+]J{. uZY `i Jt� .an ^,a /0'�. A� L��gq d0 N ,tl611.N �!'I ��: Mars +Wj O.w .w � ' 0 N L}11"�tt� Pgwq" ww' $tl�s_i-».N .yy®v��I.,Z. �p��`� 371u- �"' To-- SOYe_.P CN�_. CL A gM_'a YS ^ {f 9 N�j yaV L¢�. iN�u L N9 VZO 5'ra^oO0`.$'7 .K ". ..$ a1:+" s...dq`�.MYu $� qd qa o. ti5 MV"S `° :"2°,?a3'� j> .c�SP �aiM, g'g y� wN O S 8S Y= 8 Ma —wq ~ +M .90 pip pra p I l a i 3LC d• 6..�6V O M GN b lNi _Sv t" afs y4`il Cw ^ a oA O aa"a� ist" k tff. $ s *��— S'3a�i �i$1 T� $" ��'S �aQ,ffi .�. L Misr IM- :�£�.�i�4�g � A�a-% 1-11 A� Max N Cl\ P � Y�Q YAM s^ + �'b1Y D WM N0Cg W I�By LEI( Sai .= dh 0l Mqf �I M3 Oy YYy �41�7. i t,. p j w■ 19all N Y as 4 �2 26 tG s�N NN 4�w VI V `' 1 � a�`t pNR MYYQ Ybn.]►Cd �rl^MaVp� i�LN d ALVNy MsiQyy Vpe yM�'a p4tM�YRif'. Va�s ~Rqyyqee w�Y at RwY.N VI 1. �`o i� co .�.. sr � c.�nu�w ln.i`a''.•..�: �fi�Y. c �p6�0� .. O+ y A s• �M ea •V^^ IIY.� iY_• Cr.�,pr �Yfy y� Mom . YN a: ~Ya6f O^. ,01�.q O1 3-m3 1IC^iy. CC�V1. 0 ■ �t`! ~SS tl ' G�YfV9.Y^rt•�^..q� ai�rY O qA N gC G 2.3 1.V. wd T� u•g�qp{{1 ry�CY Y.Y.M CG'C` y �e�. G 61,1 _N}E,P•yYy �..^ww- CCYGb Y,.p,j jtlt® CVY IS r OwwV CIVS�. ,YG G �[ W.Y�^_ C �y�OYL. u•Y61 •. •^G ~!- 'A eMq Vq V I�yOY^N. rMrsCN6e 'Da l� _gyCNM N• • (� �^w� yltpf A� �.•wl� ��� ~� �gM. �V� Vylb��YNY���N w��p_YI YSO My q�uuyOL` ;(C�j. CUYi" M a� O 1. 1"Iw ,1�0 V S 41.gy0 YN�6/Y6 yTj $i�Qi9 :.�$I CFI~ 'i/''u✓ aYSs Gi ' •V V / 14 �Y :Z8. N L p .��r`$�^Nq MCy M V C bg y •� ci. o,. � o�. Ir a YYYYr a �'� • wvib. t ■Ja oYo Lr• Y Yp ."."'e$L9 �..a; ^r< ,1 ■* n`�. N ' wry'wIy Y s o CU A fA N 9 N fC 1n^ M 3.i 1�N t :�N C V t 10.11 W�fO.N Y 0 R.O i� li •,.�N O 1 th 1 og2l Se. Cg ti` {1 =0t C� e0y� {pip1Y�•Y� Y• •�eG q �pOpp ` -I!Let! . 03 N!3!•V MM.� Np v.Y YYOS � �.6't{I/� y 2 4� •N` ~ry 61wC�N� •� wli IY� y.�w S �,pG� V41 rC RO d6i ■ N g 9B Y. � � L^u ■ � V a � 99 G ■C6— pt G> i. tlM� gY ray S-a- ip ".R p��l �GG .521$ y 5 V0S^0 �I M�Oa !y �S. � �aY y`r Y •w��31 �w$^•3'• $L ix A L• fS p '1- r aY rp.. g.S G'O ^OY� 9Yi^I�3� L �wyy0 �= M00 _ asS N vOY cM�`QQ St 7�� `yp"�eY a=� • J^$ i 6II _M u~.+ o�' •O C Stl Y $g1sQ Ba, a�` C24 Sal �1 Sg f�y� �Io M Qwa JY+If O r P�w s •y r M ci IM A w� Y SB �IIM`b. • r • IyyY OO!Nr r 0. 9.� •^ra V O'r •� el augw• �x.�i ; „� `4� 'f:� rC iyG.�w - �g1�1� 0�r C b���4 1Y yy �pj�y1 7� �YU L 111 N w SV rwo�® L Y=�= ^il Y ^ YbG� �ti f` il``r• }�' ��� w�U111vS 4 o31a dal a .x�� .12 r u I w 04 ci. Z`1 W � v q Yq�• ._w0 Y�JY C { Cif$ CP dj q� p=•fj��y �= C. � YC$.�Y .•y, g ,C u$ ny �a�q�CC'^%4M.� 'vu■�� .w,u L O Y Y w ti ,i C 6 qq u!Y�R 8 L • `p ,C��aY y I�.e �Ey + OyN raFi�g; VN;uqN.0 �N W 5R33 ygggs:«x'i a..•a 3.y.u y��!� {tl�: r� f(N a� u^o •F. ^poUU1 u�� q�YU �NyYp�'� M.v Qi CL yyY t L Y.�S g':g.. W Y=&'• YM. M.� ZiQi + 9�.5+ `C CYFb� ,S-j b y�gCO a R •��1 O_YY'...�����SSS(((5!!! .O ` /•� 4CY ■s YYS 9 ]~¢(^_C ,�O �q \✓ Sb c.�a N�{.{ L CO;` Oi ZI MYyY�• �L�L��I. S`C Yw .�` y1�.si @ s..W3"GiM '�• YAt .G g.}r �••M� YM 4.MS Owy10'V-2ya', �v NaCCI afr«yt� yD� yyi :3SZ �acw w d4 � YyT„C VO.�. LQ G�ywY1 H o w■■ua(y +O�Yc�Q �Sil•`^� N 4M U t Y C< ' w -.3.2�. bull. w g y Yy V IS-•.4V RI F•C 6w 7g{y� �+•'. :4+'i W �+3 $� � ` .a. N. SV� W N■ I. T 1 pp y e p. ��s G 1 C^LfV t V9 L� _��Y �: ��? Y.� �e S. ENVY p`Y�� �.W����T. -:Y^ LO VC, C e pLp g Y S 01` O rO. Y w.q JC G eC O N A^ ^y�s ; � YY$_$yyPq �•ru > wwn6. �� Vp•A$� C �y yH M.�•M1 $yN g �w �P L.VN� � cN �•••w. L`�L' S i + am D� G7 +qY yY�Y 7LE �y �^4 �4 N • w {0•^g ;G"L y LLI:�Q� w �q®® ^ Cam}� 'a w� � V Y ,yS�e. �i^i C�i+1. {�Y•� �.��• �M V V J C'G� a L 'V.�^ y�Y� qw��. N�p � ONI§�• 7.0 ^Y.N ��pb. ppp5rrr f. a G O s poi V_ y w y= C a1 9 H TV Y C a. . +71Yp VVy� ieRw �^ isle Zia -zz In «~a IS,o usn« §SDI@r^ '�L' {� 'YdLe'pp I=+NII � Vl N w 'Hit 3-f 5 t, �NaU Q. 10� N.. al 1► -a 5 iCt V .GONQ♦ P�OY C I � �p O. "Yn.nu Tom. Ei P W.. i y A. A.. + Y Y •`Fd a�✓p0 NCB _ �y N ti- OOgpJy 'O /q� uj a�C aGC�OCw O• LYCC� �� O `. aAi � �w W■ wp.� hw moo. CYii�Y'y Cpd Y D !V'Y L�L- p.Ir"'• ^ "sOaY' R L. YIIN•11 YOC. le. O MY p ACV O� w.♦ pp. u O�■p.�y�ad yYMN O` C p 6 �' ^ Y�O-5C N.L iM.... N. uy, {•uys� �v wv ♦+. 04 NN• YC^C j,C C�WC P oi�( A•tl� tl�O N"�C 9 H 4.d��V N� Y. $ $ S u$ L L V Y ti.�G I+V y.'!a.". 'u ` �•0 ye }.i 6^. .� "'i' . —14 'VO O J tt� c`` � of y cog s7�i+'? a.tl.s O• =s a� Yyy YVA sd M=r L-may � A ••d� r•Cay �pY V� • 9 Q ^ s ^ L N ��c Y V OI r G ;�Y. 'yypp V 11Q` iii i �O Y`• ��6. � • N�n�y �Y. Y.. : L Rp�•{wj� A.y�g NV�� o au it i Y 6 • L to its V. 5tr -3 p Y ' g Y •NK Y� V y 414,11 + Tq ad `o g �' _ yy oy py«,j }$ q y agp e "•;� p•l� 9 •V't o�. ^�C �...®Y�$i Ky G V yAiTL th N,Cq '^� Ya ''7uav •0 7. J9 ^� y.0 a� c.Y SIR v010L A'• �� GY �g�Lp �yV�j 1.i •�cS.. a W� tl J�'�.�Q •gVy� Y.��y•V! OqS wpp{hy ++.�. r•V�r LQ��Q``••v N 53��� L9 i Cam �0p yN0� �� cOcY O$yyyy' Y. 4 N. Nw. .'�:O NC^Qnp$■ M;1051 W1VV WVY gyp. t7�01 4rrl ytl+G�.OL/ iP�. b�. L 6 � {1... i f Vt &�L tit .G p 0. W <I O' iiE p C gat A.- Li Bo' a' SAY ,. + 24 s•rRc 'y $ �` 'Ly'w 'i�Yw ' aw a" yv ^ & u , df N C L L r y 7S Y Ll, CY 44 OVb va O AV�V' .�yv'C N: a p y�y ` St O�W �L.. dam\p O C L L�y G Y 1�:iL'� If • _C 5' O Y V. 2 4 rt[..� 8y�y� Q■�y.t 9� W. K® y as gag N�''LT ■N j%w �aY 6if.Y' 4af L ^ C Yy +3 TY ttad y �n Y M M Y • « Y �! fig• � � �� 3' �' ®�9L }'��'-a ��` w 1st` jai19 S$ x 1.4 `M �: lit _ 22 M M its i yyYy L Y yy uy`pp �l � McC�Yp�: CY �. � ir.W V�4gM qd iL W qA m w �u Ai ni M �n rr �i Cp Y Y y °u2L a o J2 0 vs it0l` y i�i YY �Yppr OY O ��• i �a8 1 t n 1 `o c g« '� _«'cQ1•�. .fit. .'� g' $ �: 1 �.".- a Y a7 Ali Ai ` p aw jj ex 24 41 4, $» qyT �Hr Epp ZZ N 8u II wY= •o a a sae E s.� � C ..��..� tip VV Ir, L tI wr�11 L w z i 2: 9 I c r �,� 4 / ` ' CITY OF R �dCHa C RUC AI AM©NGA STAFF REPORT A DATE: July 12, 1989 Tr: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Sulter, City Planner BY: Vince Bertoni, Assistant Pl,lnner SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION ORDINANCE An yen en. to Chapter of the municl,pal Code, modifying parking requirements for condominiuiv conversions to be consistent with Development CG(de parking requirements. I. BACKGROUND:, In 1980, the City Council adopted Ordinance 119 which estetflisWeT requirements for the conversion of apartments �;o condwiiniums. These requiremetts included the provision of_Ixo covered,, on-site parking spaces per unit in a garage or carport. At the time, the City was using County of San Bernardino Standards for parking which also required two covered, on-site parking spaces per unit for apartments and condominiums. When the Development Code eras adopted i 1983 the parking p P n F 9 re uire _nts far apartmeets and'-.*ondominium were changed, tA° s ch n e to a q 1 ,. e standard based on the nrmbt.r of bedrooms each unit contained. After a revision in 1987`0`these Standards currently range from 1.3 off-street parking spar es per unit for a studio to 3 off- street parking spaces for a four bedroom unit. II. Analysis: Staff has recently ;.eceived requests for condominium conversions and has initiatNd this amendment to bring the Condominium Conversion standaAs into consistency with standards for new development. '.A order to bring these two into consistency, staff recommends: Section 17.22.040.3 shall be amended to read as follows: Each unit shall provide parking as required by Development Code Section 17.12,040, III. RECOWENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a attached" Resolution recommending approval of this ordinance amendment. x ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NO. AMENDM T TO„THE CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION ORDINANCE ~1 July 12, 1989 Page i Res 11y s ed, Bra Ar City ,lanne►" ss:vg:3s Attachments: Exhibit "d" Existing Condominium Conversion ,.Regulations Exhibit "B" _ Existing Development Code i - 1 {r i 17.22.040 Pro ert development stand° v _ standards. A. General Requirements. No final map for the purposes of condominium conversion will be accepted for filing unless the following requirements, which shall be conditions of approval of the tentative map, are: approved: 1. Each dwelling unit shall conform to current noise and energy insulation s,andards required by the latest adopted Uniform Building Code or other applicable law or regulation. 2. Each unit shallhave installed smoke detectors as required by the latest ado ted edition Uniform 3. For each unit there shall $e provided a minimum of two covered, on-site parking spaces per unit in a garage or carport, plus an addit,�nal twenty per of the total spaces provided for uest parking ran-covered, 4. we eiy e,tere fo gas and electricity unless `he city approves a plan for equitable sharing of communal metering. S. Each unit shall be provided with separate water shut-off valves and electrical main shut off. 6. Each area for trash placement and pickup shall be adequately designated snd ail 1 reuse sha ll be removed on a regularly scheduled basis from the premises.' 7. Permanent mechanical equipment which the build- ing official determines is a potential source of vibration or noise shall be shock mounted or isolated, or otherwise mounted in a manner approved by the building official to lessen the transmission of vibration and r.-ise. S. Illuminated addresses, and if round necessary by NORTH: II1 I x OF ITEM, Amambnent 1 AWL 17.12.040 Parkin, Requirements, The following sec- tions list the required amount of,parking for each category of uses, special requirements and optional requirements.' A. Residential.. 1.. Single-family detached dwelling: (conventional) Two parking spaces within a garage, 2. Cluster development en omitit,�, townhouse, apartments, etc.) seni-detached sing e- amity (zero lot line, patio homes, duple?rs,_etc.) end mobile home parks: a. Studio:. .= .3 off-street parking spaces per unit of which one sp:.e shall be in a garage or car;art, b. One; .edroom: 1.5 off--street parking spaces per unit of which one space shall be in a garage or carport, c. Two bedrooms: 1.3 off-street parking spaces per unit of which one space shall be in' a garage or, carport, d. Three bedrooms: 2 off-street parking spaces per unit of which one space shall be in a garage or carport, e. Four or more bedrooms: 2.3 off-street parking spaces per unit of which two spw:es shall be in a garage or carport, f. In addition to the required ntmrber of parking spaces for each unit, one off-street uncovered,.parking space shall be provided for each four units for visitor parking. For single-family zero lot line, patio homes, and dupt. ixes, on-street parking may be substituted for visitor parking, where sufficient :,ptreet pavement width and, distance between drivewAys ha3 been provided, g. Fifty percent of the total required covered spaces shall by within enclosed garage structures, h. For developments containing five or more units, up to thirty-five percent of tha required uncovered spaces may be compact Gar site, i. The use of carports requires approval from the design review committee.; y NORTF CITY OF ITEM: APILNtC t CUCA TITLE: PlA vrTING1,.,DIVISIGANI f EXHIBIT: SCALE Adak RESOLU`fION NO. A RESOLIlTIOM OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO,CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDIN APPP,�VAL OF REQUEST TO AMEND THE CHAPTER 17 22 OF THE KJNIC,I'AL CODE, MODIFYING PARKIN REQUIREMENTS FOR CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS TO BE CONSISTEWT WITH_DEVELOPMENT CODE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. WHEREAS, on Qe 12th day of July 1939, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65650 to 66865 of the California Goverment Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of this amendment. 2. The Planning Commission hereby reco'rAwnds that the City Council approve this amendment to the Muni ci pal Code per the attached Ordinance. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THII!12TH DAY OF JULY 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF`>RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. MCNiel, chairman ATTEST: a a er, . fre. a y. 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of July 1989, by the following vote-to-wits AYES- COMMISSIONER': NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: f� ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IRE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORRIA AMENDING CHAPTER 7.22 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, MODIFYING PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS TO BE CONSISTENT WITHDEV►ELOPMENS,' CODE RE'QUt,"EMENTS, WHEREAS, on thin day of 1989, the City Council held a duly noticed public" 'acing pursua.�n o ection 65864 of the California Government Code. The City Council of the City'of Rancho Cuamonga does ordan as follows. SECTION 1: Section 17,22.040.3 of the Municipal Code shall be amended to read" "as follows t Each unit shall provide parking as required by Development Code Section 17.12.040. f - _1 .:. . _ E. c CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT '' DATE: July 19, 1989 r TO: Chairman and Members of the. Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Gratin, Assistant Planner SUBJECT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-10 GENESIS L - The eve opner, ov a 50,000 square foot office tacMty on 4.6 ' acres of land in the > Industrial Paru District (Subarea 12) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street - APN: : 229-341-02 and 04' VARIANCE 89-0E- GENESIS REAL ESTATE - A request to reduce the minimum ,'iding setback, the minimum parking setback, and the average landscaping depth requirements for a 50,000 office facility on 4.6 acres of land in ;the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and 6th street - APN: 229-341r-02 and 04. I. PROJECT ANO SITE DESCRIPTION A. Action Re uested• Approval of the detailed site plan; building a eva-o s; Variance for a reduction in the building, parking, and 'average landscaping setbacks; and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning NoRh Existing industrial wilding; Gen,_,^al Industrial District (Subarea 11) - ;South - hadan =industrial `Park District (Subarea 12) East Vacant; Ind.-;strial Park District Subarea 12) West Vacant; Industrial Park District (Subarea 12) -C. General Plan DesDesi�nat_ions: ro�jec'tSite- industrial Park North Gene a'�,Jndustrial South Industrial Park ,East Industrial Park West - Industrial Park . I r rM J,K, f PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 89-10 GENESIS :REAL ESTATE July 12, 1989 Page ?. AMk .0. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Reouired Provided Office 50,000 1/250 200 _326 E. Site Characteristics: The project site is located on two parcelsswithin tge--6ixby Business Park. The site is vacant and vegetation 'consists of native grass and weeds.. Street- improvements along Milliken Avenue and 6th Street have been completed; however,, they will be modified as a result of Engineering conditions,of approval. II. ANALYSISs A. General: The proposed dovelopment consists of a single-story Mice uiiding totaling 50,000 square feet. The proposed architecture is a contemporary style of concrete tilt-up construction,-gray and green window glazing, green aluminum mullions., and a metal roof screen for mechanical equipment. B. Variance: In conjunction with this Oevelo,�tent Review app ca on, the applicant has also submitted a Variance request for the following 'inconsistencies with current development standards: t . 1.. Reduction of the required 45 foot building setback on Sth Street to 35 feet. 2. Reduction of the required 25 foot parking setback on Milliken Avenue to 22 feet. 3. Reduction of the required 45 foot average landscaping depth on Milli%en Avenue to ,39 feet. 'in reviewing the proposed Variance, a finds substantial constraints that affect development ona there the project cite. The requested Variance application ms submitted largely as a result of street widening condition-Amposed'by the Engineering Division. Existing street improvements-will: be widened up to 4 feet along 6th Street and up to 14 faet along Milliken Avenue, resulting in the requested Variance,. as all street side setbacks are measured from the ultimate face of curb. With respect to the requested reduction in the building setback along 6th Street, originally the building was proposed at the setback line of 45 feet from the existing face of curb. The required right-of-way dedications reduced this PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR"39-10 - GENESIS REAL, ESTATE July 12, 1989 Page 3 7 setback to 41 feet froi ithe face of curb. After or�iffminary meetings with staff;' the applicant proposed" to add architectural elements to the north face of tte building to .achieve a more animated facade, resulting ,in a setback of 35 feet from the ultimate face: of curb. Based on the fact that development of the project site is affected by new requirements for additional right-of-way ,and street paving, staff determines strict irr,r_pretat ons of the Code would cause unnecessary' hardship and, deprive the applicant of privileges .enjoyed by other property owners in the immediate area. C. Desi n , view Committee: The Committee (Chitiea, Tolstoy, o eman)l-,eviewea the project on July 6, 1989, and recommended approval W,�th the following conditions: 1. A consistent enriched paring treaU.ent should be provided at the driveway; the building entryway, and the employee plaza area. The enriched paving treatment should be designed ,for consistency with existing- paving' treatments within the Bixby Business Park. 2. The sidewalk north of the driv6.ay on Milliken . Avenue should be meandering and sho667, coon-ct to a hardscape pla4 opposite the building''sz. in entry, 3. Landscapifig along: Milliken Avenue and 66 Street - should be increased to include bdt ? ng and ' additional tree and shrub plantings to a ance the building elevation by providing a focalized yet articu'.3ted entry landscape theme. 4. The corner of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street should be desiened as a focal point with multi-trunk trees and shrub plantings. 5. Additional parking lot tree planting should be provided within the parking lot to 'break up long expances of par;:ing along the east and south perimeter. This may include the planting of trees within tree wells with appropriate protective measures to protect the trees from damage. The parking spaces adjacent to tree wells in the parking lot should be a minimums of 10 feet wide to allow adequate space for manueveri'ng' vehicles without damaging the tree plantings. Additionally, trees planted within or along the perimeter of the parking lot shall be located to prevent car overhangs from damaging the. trees. The use ar-,tire stops would also be azceptable.Ar PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 89-10 .. GENESIS REAL ESTATE �d July 12, 1989 Page 4 'E+, 8. Extend, the upper portion of the freestanding wall along 6th Street into the building corners. (See Exhibit °F")', D. Environmental Assessment: , Staff has completed the Envirinmental Checklist and has determined that the development of this project will not cause significant adverse impacts. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In, order for the' Planning Commission to approve Development Review 89-10 and Variance 89-08, facts to support tle following findings must be made: A. Development Review 89-10: 1 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Platt. 2. That the proposed use, building design and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with each of the applicable provisions cf the Industrial Specific Plan. i 3. That the propdped use, together withthe conditions applicable thereto,_ N,ill not be dLtrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially Injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. B. Variance 8t;'-03: 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation Mould result ini practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Indtstrial Specific Plan and the Development Code: 2. That because existing street improvements will be ltidened up to 4 feet along 6th Street and up to 14' feet along. Milliken Avenue, there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone, PLANNING COE' ISSION STAFF REP ORT^ DR 89-10 - GENESIS REAL ESTATE July 12, 1989 Page 5 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the Industrial Specific Plan requirements of a building setback of 45 feet off_ 6th Str`et, a parking setback of 25 feet of�i Milliken Avenue, and a landscape depth 'requirement of 45 feet average off Milliken Avenue would depr',ve the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone.. 4.. That the granting- of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. 5. That the g'anting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCEF, The Variarce application was advertised as a public earing in The' DailyRe Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent-too all property owners within 300 feet of, the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Plarining Commission approve t60-e-opment Review 89-10 and Variance 89-08, and issue a Negative Declaration. r R idly itted, l Br r fJ City ann BB: :G:mig Attachments: ,xhibit "A" - Letter frotr Applicant Providing JusiReuest ExhOitfiBatioLocation/S teeUtilization ?Nap Exhib�Z "C - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "0" - Conceptual Grading Plan' Exhibit "'c" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit Y'F" - Elevations. Exhibit "6" - Interior Courtyard Resolution of Approval for Development Review 89-10 and Standard Conditions Resolution of Approval for Variance 89-08 A`` wnSFORt(";i .- June 27, 1989 PIanning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road P.O.Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 l' RE: Request for Variances at 9337 Milliken Ave.-Sears Consolidated Credit Center The purpose of this lets t,is to request the following setback variances for the Sears Consolidated Credit Center Project loeated at 9337 Milliken Avenue: (1)Building setback on Sixth Street of 41 ft rather than 45 ft.;(2)Landscape setback on Milliken Avenue.of 39 ft.avenge rather than 45 ft average,and(3)Parking setback or,Milliken:A've of 22 ft.minimum rather than 25 ft,minitnum. In all three situations encroachments am the result of City-required dedications for a deceleration( f right turn lane at the comer of Milliken A enue and Sixth Street Addidonally,the building setback encroachment on Sixth Street is increas li;dy by enhancements to the building's�nrirth face hi response to Planning Commission reques for mote hiteatural interest and depth oathat elevation. Our understanding has been that such sn encroachment is not seen as a problem by the City in the interest of creating a"re interesting architectural statement on this future major intersection. Thank you for your consideration of this request for variances. Sincerely, Allan G.Lune ord r, < `' :► r i U» h� PI IPP eP P43 P q 93 P r4 P PP i c C Iij1 P l N exMIT M 11 - ........... �.- -- . sanc►saes; .._.... ,._ .._ i — c 4 1t r ! Igo, Pr Uj ILJ look .,. sm: _Rl.. t i �1•. �• eY1...y •ZY�.i��t1 ' • w ff Vmsl - ` t M i ( i f ;''slfCC� t ro � `�d� �• l:r g t UK F � J t t tn, 4 J t t m..w..<. .. Rr FFF!, d Z 1 f a tl11�I1IIIIiIlll � � t , i -^! � fs -41 r r x i I: ; i f' , i � i 0 rest 1 • t e r c e e a r e r clue slr+e c c c c c e s c clr c e e e c c e rle c e e$ e c elc e r e e r c e c e c r c rc r e 1 j � j G r C CI r C C r C C C C C C r C C C r @ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i l p I '/1 �. t '� 1 •/ 1 iRCOI. \ j KRA.'Gr f--��-RRCit IrRY ii OYAI'f @ t ? w R A Y p t 1 1 tcers j !r� cr'r�cc�cce w eeareetecFe'GSe i 1 ...._..-..`_`_... _ y a._ _ — _. .. ...................... 1 i - an I tW AMUM -Wwr ui [IRS HG— wp/y rw@o•Y let. t ORTI "ITY OF 10 Al t i IF.�o7a s NORTI CITY OF RANCHO U A N A 'TITLE: $ .; ; III G DIVISIONX'12- EXHIBIT':_. ..SCALD. ,�� t� E� E ���• CE EE �,i ��Ch;j -17 ! 1}� ar ZI I — ................................................. yrV � '.L�f'fx � •lJrf I Jay . =: L-m- r*- S-r. CITY OF ITEM:ffi ,ffl ",10 ,A C O CUC M TITLE: l PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBM r SCALE: o w a»+nw.�. pw.Fw wes, .a I 17 JAM 1t w*�P� F'mfs�f ir.rd�*'fioF e�Yg�ao +I ANCHO CA O GA TITLE: �e 1 PLANNING DIVISION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 89-10 THE D.EVELOPMENT,OF A '50,000`SQUARE FOOT OFFICE FACILITY ON 4.6 ACRES OR LAND, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND M STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT DUBAREA 12) OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS SUPPORT THEREOF. APN:. 223-341-R2 AND ,Q4, A. Recitals. (i) Genesis Real Estate has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No, 89-10 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the ram...,'-Zevelopment Review request, is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 12th of July, 1989, the Planning Cd,,mission of tha City of Ranc;:o Cucamonga condcted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting 3-9 that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution_ (� NOW, THEREFORE, it hereby found, de r�mined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamon ,u as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifica""�finds that all of the facts set forth in the Reeltals,_Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct., 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on July 12, 1989, including written ,and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street, with a street frontage of 560 feet along Milliken Avenue and 340 feet along 6th-Street; and (b) The property to the north of the subject si.tp;�onsists of an ex, sting industrial building, the property to the south, ea's"t,;and west is vacan 3. Based' upcn the substantial evidence presented to this Comnission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts f set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: __ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR 89-10 " MESI5 REAL ESTATE July 12, 1989 Page 2 (a) That eproposedt�Project is consistent with the objectives, of e General Plan- and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the ob,7ectiva of the Development Code and the ti purposes of the district in which the site is located; and tt (e) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of tT _:applicable provisions of the j Development Ccdi;; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to they:<public health, safety, or welfare, or matEnazt�{y injurious to properties or improvements ?`n"The vicinity.' 4� This Commission ilereb„; finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in with the California Envirpnfiental Quality Act of 1970 and, further„. his Commission hereby issues a w�,gative Declaration, 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Co mission hereby approves the application subject to each and every Gonditionfset forth below and "in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto a`nd incorporated herein by this reference. Planning 1livision I) A consistent enriched paving treatment shall be; provided at the driveway„t,he build€ng entryway, and the employee plaza ' area`. The eh.,iched pav=ng treatment shall be designed for compatibility with Park,istinubject paving toreatm review and nts Nan roval the iby xby the$iCits -t planner prior to the issuance of building.p rmits. 2) The sidewalk north of the drive'ay on Milliken Avenue shall �e meandering and shall zonne�44 with a hardscape` plaza apposite the main entry to the building. Cesign, of the meandering sidewalk is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. Design of the hardscape plaza shall be shown on the landscape plans and is subject to review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits, PLANKING COMMISSION,RESOLUTION NO., OR 89-10 - GENESIS REAL ESTATE July 12, 1989 Page S 3) landscaping along Milliken Avenue:and 6th Street shall be increased to include berming and additional tree and shrub plantings to.:enhance the building elevation,. and shall be shown on the landscape plans subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 4) The corner of Milliken Avenue aiia,�,6th Street shall be designed with a special landscaoea)focal point such as a specimen multi-trunk tree and,�shall be subject to review' and approval by the City:.Fggineer and City Planr;er poor to the issuance of building permits. 5) Additional parking lot tree planting shall be provided within the parking lot to reak up long expances of i-_-rkiM�41ong,the east and south perimeter. This may include the plantinCt of trees within tree wells with appropriate protective measures to protect the trees,,,` from damage. The parking spaces adjacent to the treq? wells in the parking lot sh;\17 be a minimuvi of 10 fee411 wide to allow adequate space`-.>for manuevering vehicles without damaging the tree plantings. Additionallyt trees planted within or along the perimeter of the parking lot shall be located to prevent car overhangs from damaging the�trees. The use of tire stops would also be acceptable. The design of the tree plantings shall be included on the landscape plan.' Use of the Metal grate will require Design Review Committee review and approval of the grate material and design prior to the issuance of building permits..- Engineering Division r . A. Special Conditions; 1) The developer shall dedicate additional- right-of-way. as necessary and complete the follo"ng items to the satisfaction of the City Engineerz a) Milliken Avenue reconstruct curb and gutter along the project frontage and as far south of the south property line as is necessary to provide a right turn lane for the project entrance and ultimate,' ntersection geometrices. b) A fee in contribution for the reconstruction and landscaping of the median island on Milliken Avenue shall be. paid to the City. The fee shall I� be one-half the 6\�st of the construction and s landscaping as deterflned by the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION-NO OR 89-14 - GENESIS REAL ESTATE S July 12, 1989 Page 4 r.) Sixth Street - reconstruct curb and gutter and. reconstr+ict the median island as necessary to provide4;,ultimate intersection ge=atrices from Milliken easterly as necessary. d) Landscape ,`the 6th Street median island from Milliken Avonue to Pittsburgh Street. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement for landscaping the portion of the median Island east of:the east property line and for one-half the conk of the portion along the project frontage from future development/redevelopment as it occursl,on the opposite Side of the street and to the east of the project site, 2) The drive approach shall be constructed at 35 feet in width at the right-of-way line. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 1Ir OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I. BY: Larry T. McRiel, AT'C'FST: "Traau Buller,Secretary I, Brad Butler, Secretary of!'*he Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucasmvrga;, do hereby certt-Ify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the'PIanning Commission held on the 12th day of July, 1989, by the. fot<�swing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS. ASSENT. COMMISSIONERS M�ya�4��,04"�) C�CL1y9yy ^G Y}yL+.�C9. �C yO 'nQ�/:w VM �� �:�•V Qu �N 4 M V` 4�44 Y Q. ~' •O�`e L u♦■ 'V�7 �. G w�'����'~C N ,y C Y p 1.1• v`p s" �a� s�[r u , LL (G �gaqui Y m�g.4y E..y H�9� ��� �N �'G' �4q C^.•a�MMq 4�f? E._. cu w�vma.�i""� S'$ g'b,•,u �;.�`. Tin'^ S.E. "�a a°�. IS: bL `o,�+ "`' qp NN. +]RnC �s � y�y dyYi s^� L�� O Yyy��. n 1•�Vs yy /fig q rt "TJ�yYy�M d CwyLCb d'y �/p yY� O G'6 L Nt L{O� p �V: ��,NY�M� �14 s.��l ��� b1y�$Y l. �MMN �O`•'w�Yy /�Y � Cp pYy y 4W1,IM µwM 4OS �M„N M i.Oyr .� ud�y.�`c Yw zgs�� wr �uw.ot�.Yi a;°. � tteC ayy� �t- ^y .r4 .. sso o, ."��. ,�C�C „`4.♦I � f+St 15�vs q�� <NVN• N�. �.O OR 1�6�{•44i Lw W' 4 j1j1(fF • � i w M 1+ IM1 N Yyy > 'MR'•N���si�� �. 47� p. O �14 ��• ��04t"i� .R o 20 4 4'�elF L� s ar Q ps4i H �� ti pw EO.ww 4r�aj• �qZ.O. �R.i]h�`rt b CU Xi �V S,! �YiY y' �'Qwyw Qi�j4 y.4 NC3. SLYGd a' YN� U N.�J� ji. yAw SwMY NYwrY V�D� Nr yiN+�~�q�, ► c Nadi LL�.ww O° a �m� � . 'fib ' ao a�- � two .�uL I AlV �N g+ u„a 'uu@K,a."..`,ppiv «a'A`L'3<.w"... 'a per+ q .+Nn` S7 ` ■y°U 4R C{q� 'y w1,C��ai gwa L »GN.wN.s Q 4 °°�M 4 G'R ~mppC YYw.MY RN,M(�44�A" �y,z =y. C.'N.A w�1,, m N q�a9 N 1�(j�S ]Cr p w F r�.'en F AyM w hC 1-S i 7Q: 4 ww�w� a 1 6. SaX� ✓ a��Ncw. r � .+TAM Y �Ct a':.yrc..'Z ;yU■.;iw,y$ '.{{.� u >ra spiiS .N.��'.■SyVw.la�a1 p".u(pa,�..�yp '� LQ Q�jQ�y�ty^!-' yazsj ... fp~p.r^ rp-�i2nw^..YiLt _,,ccV @4;_6p�.F6{R�� L�L+I`gYLY4 u{� VLv.36L� Ci1 Y K+Ja ig4 N.W NM Y. N V i� iiQNsiw yew.I•..iC <.L eN. I ct N t a'95 �'t L }� Sj_79A a4n S~N VY Q1N&� �,�•�aLL N��� q �1 nl c4 L � �`ri ao"&' Troy► Pou vg.n,p�, a^ !#' RRg `S Se US t 1.4 �I �q. ��0. Vw �... �Lw�y�V a.♦L 4 sl fib+ w Le]� Ja .i S i:"fc :.�i.'� '�y} 's g...:weMoo $�$� � ol4 2_1u� 4 S'v y�� '3! t:. �s�G �G '". t yS4+1�A a� gb NS^ar1 � g1l ! W C ,MwM .w C y1.0 ry°i: j Z"I; .T. s Egl- g Oii AS YB-; �1.8" 31.33 '09 6i' "^2 4Q"Ar y46� �`^�� 4ta. 4 +. s"&rr`a WY v .. i'$' '°�v'"'�'" at3yd$,`°..m __my °.. V L f z 4 ass 9`d' q t a."'b w`.f a w Z w+ 1�..... Z. vai yy 7-77 a u u -2t lC t p PG 6C ....aai��NUV«9 y� RM {N�> pp NN �1�Yf.'tl{Si^:I � ■O G it L WC 9, VN 'q•'! QO M4. a1��l�.jmr; P' {{aa r+fLl w`aVq ° .. P. �Y g q y�1.ii X' G1CYG 66 ■ L ip y L O 2 4a b�C°OaSO P P NCI. �ti4y'YOp� o Y 6r ) J q.Omw 4. q:iu�.«$a =.6.Yu 2 tly ..N.D my L.�s! v�+iV. +•.ry ..-N Q Q'�. P No o o g M■L OY'M. $v' Nbi, ,.p ,y,Cawon+`��^y �$j A�$'ceNagw q Y=L bkly q G�•6. a'g 7 N.w A Y '"Q�yM�" _q. q N d..0 d`d' ego- Nrs no rg .°~1=�' t.Ce6rC'+$aP.= d'C• a 3 a `A . rec,,, ..y�yO.qy�y*s�vQr$�ivy�ygK: aL�..C�h YC.U��Ss.CyCi °gL06 GE U MIL 4~. O A .ti.NP6 !T V8tl-C •"� A N y �E ; 6f�' sOI V• I q. �+V Q%yL 1 N�s � ~N �yl ep LMU 4cW O•�'��Yq�P �UytM �Nq{`a` M /•� G�: w4L arry�+ �4No y+ra. tlIM^ LL, � � a V NH tz SyJ. Lr r. Rw. �n_N y ! •LAP _y0 ,v ��[LYg Caro 'G NyiS �O1sA�y°.� qC{n. tly Z.•1{2to •i•�� L S M N T� [[ii �µ�/y� (!!! Ndgv Cq QMtty N?4 Np^P gLtaL�.Ye1Y Gyrt�i °1 Jl •°� (y.�`C{� x�.. Q.yy. f tllw NqN •(N�q... RCN =NO 1►u�ji KN q`l .}C)N aNSV G't•r`i y r� CCLY . N L L 4 Y Y CT q � ``• n 4r� n.ve,zn CN•~ ��GA °¢ N b 4 wni QpL'wQ G�� 'R� nN -.` sP1a�:ClI!�a a arm u C N pppyL a A a1 Y.m y L� YL 4 F+C 4qr I OR Ow LNtyR VMyih 'I OG� NGy� >N� q�ee u PaEF q j+y Cq 6,, .5. Mesa: PN �yy9.y' A A� 4a « i ^o'rs q 6 -�3 L-« ba+ 4,K C YMrYy�" ,K O jd a4 t m eCYa r� 4wNqjg $u 54 t':Sy:sob�o qT 00 9 a 9 �grv��,{y�.Lul -y y 4 6 S Z' V y1'' ice•• Y Xs� 9V Iesw Q LiB- �� Y « bi.VQ LS .,% P i ai q V 1 al N N p 4. E.�`� �?.aw v �+n c ��� ayi � y'$� a� ic.Y■.+y..a' �°�T>'_^"Q. Q q« L V w 4 yC o L L�r N «Y 7. y:U Ae C Y.. avi oa. G L •L 2,,. ,. M� C'4 wjY y� ��81'"` L ^.` , a.A"�FYi. GCS LyQq.� 7 P.N LVN VN CAAL �. ua r .� �•4��ti� :c'nyy N� 3"a �u ea htxtO <+ r vv'N Ma.`*. `su: ivL `o�N+ aa�d � `s`i1,3°. 4 M14 4 o g U �_y.VGq�+Wwyy QaC. G y @ ^cm•- auCa o.n. QoWu Ile e �y.V � O a�•C,Ca a N� y. O C yM a. AyT'o« Lam.oq`1 U`C a�oM.N.Y g1i'aa4�Vw4� p r.y VI:R a,y �y C a•�la M� Tx O aN l`�. ~IrN.YdNI 9 �N� ' ;a 4 �ao �L3w 'c,�':•. � Y L4 m• 3. was a�. G. r�aaN It.•CJY«Y� ¢Cro :ggCt col rJpT. .raJ�p '� � �N4 lgC1 q� y� t�ryJ O O C� A a C ��at � �'+.4 4 yyC�•,y W�W - ����� � �4 q. Yy pp�� 4AYr � wN fir,6y1. �lYr• MO O NW� C� +e �ONa� �J � C.� L G 4c{M pe—gtL wr "yy Cp t C rC6 N.O"` 41.�aj�xKO y •N WWI rc�u1�.� Q� Mq�bb ��(S �4 Q 9.Ly �.i . K'a r C q Ny yy aa yyyxx �j C.tis w..�L yyyyyyyLyW`� Nnsp Lai 6 Npy.N �Oe1�ti,4 1;�p$�gy fi 'i IN GQ� w•a+rgC�� yUAu CYgg 4" aC� � �.w..a.1N �� .��N °'�NM� L �N n�S.a, iii�.JJ:` �$j�yEa E^r '' '`� ouia�•�Ytaw t�tic�+� �Oy. {"�aNa �' ' ROr.�.a ^GBJ= LM CI�� �L9 �. C N .4i� 3z4�ky'`r. N'.4�.� u j. C�v •'�� a nsw Ns."'sa .y,y�L'a' .yN.ad`�qi ya��I L'^ �.0 �q r� �$$!"%3`►w £'. � >Y.� .�: A S ~yy - •(�" a+ ... G Z yy tad f .. 9 N C y V y r y. a • Y •V p a�a� Y Y Nam. R r O Nam+a N by�yy' q y LVa ^u� q r 45 4.�N VQWEIR . r a b y M A �.� Q C m N y ad Nr•q G_ C f1 @ s —2 y0 i as ' ,O a3p�aY. ,G, X LyYN yy N C�. y�. y■� 11 Y~I Nf?�KN Cpy. IN C0.82 01. DD�Y `.`.G u 'c i fS CC `�'i�S Rya y ' a.g u o,L z N ,,,, N _ CU `" �aQ�l l, I i..•.C.Y r4 � r..ra ?1b�4 fi �'w7 CwA N� Y L N4 �r.Y �6 ' d' g� aa�� y ypQ I NC jj[��i�Gj W Mpp w"y � �GD• Y Ao Y4 �� 6Q�: cCM O{, a 9 N Gyp>pW. w Qom+ y .� J l+f^xL^4_C 9 mi N rq~ IN�» q Yi L � y L.cCi ay' C 4 yN 4y � .r~iq� �p Nf�r.�T 4�wOQCCy Be Ap, $O. �„�p`�� O10 q�q �. ■ C �¢� S1��V S u N F C� Qom`M � V� �:O N`W �a'L ^ Ht3 m a,trw ur�• ,u a o.•a„ac... pp • a+... q�r,� R AA+� u�+ j/�� agg^� oy,..� `n�o'.. a'q"q�1.w l 4NV 4 W. M Y _V 9EN C wCr G w� .p NO LS 'J 2-0 NW Vy a.~a aN7 C. e r g N C 7 Y w N N; Y i�9 01 ?.. 4U v 6 * �°' �rW CL.PW YM M Np r4 C� Y■7Y. Ol Q14 Gs� E NN a I1 Mrs cCC 1.Vr4x GC_ VV O y� .�. 4r f �� I�M.0 Ya [VI', N ..�. �7.'•L' MN.�+ <'. hC 4C O.0 '� OVN C... {b a �'m A r+1s dd Qy.N�• C `� x� 2-3 dU L.iOUyO, mg C C j C." tt c Qua a G bo+ im �1 6o >a.•ti'w"s. 8y,a Y� Lµ �. Y CV. CT4 LND.D as C CAI N G b-N U L Z"- a L Oy AWE -LAU�zC la,jw# �T. V 4 U I'1AMH HY��4.1No yY¢A/N ON� -Tac ^ccx ^« ea $ a Np ^ Yvs`q dC: C. dNN�c Py ' y Pl ULDN YL: ®�L b « « OU yf � 4yNC.L Cp �Qft L O-^d NaY b�Ly. Y _`vvu in••.g�ua.OI " � i�i a � vZ c l ' -ao��.�u: z a +Tvu a' be $i £,-cski %m?�4 a.Duuo snti p u aCpu•¢ u� >.. V.- ¢aY n^ b a may O Y s C r�`orfY: o�D.� t uo, 7oaw «$S. Ca' aL..%. S Iv r Q Y L..01 Ot Y Of U A ,). G rA Y b e O .. OI L'O y �M vw q.3c�� ."ce�.'.Y¢ c 5. so VN ym GC 7.�6 y VCC B.Yp ; .1nr` s. v NYCfp`, p-L acim �C.. �.O O Vw V O V. w b a r Y�♦ w.26 OI �. L^ vC Vyd�^ y6Y NYhJ Y.p L YC Cyr W^ �.�.~ q G V CC N tT Up C�� �s D N ijQ. ��.. „A Y^ ^y�" V $i6 A 1 U O. 12 'O.Q «tl Ys•-•- {$�I' .a'�.��� �y� N'L1bp�' . www9■���w rE L(E1 {Ya6Y_Z7 G I ylNb �O/wf C M qua Y o:q t,TEL p6����. �L �6M u.Y C 1. � V A L C�. t�y -$ �� Gs �. 0� ^= N_tl rSpp O..N•yYw� Q p+`4Dq V{�Ypy CIY p! Ntu:pypse N� Ha > 6P*OW $C$C4$we T{�9�.C3�1E III N N N U L Y C ^O tl "Y L a Q O A M Q Y V w N «� CC o D M O N oa■J .N y S O A :r S Q:1� �O.■ ON p^Fl Ltd `�,y$ 9 L9,. O rC..c' -.go � �arl�OO 9..� $.6i v= �� mp $O Y.•`LI�S 4� O1A` NMO tCOy l..gY� MYu O1s G N Lw LN a VY ObtJV ON C ' aL. LG�Y�G9a UYpL�T�I(5. N�j- YU� LN CEY� I�A ==tl MYYs� o�a6y� ���: [V,y N� 01r O:MONO OL'n•a^f.. W.N.S7 W VttlOA '7C-6 -w=mz t.$ YA.SIAV 0 o`o o� p1 � Od C L6 ddd y d d ` � � Nadi a�`' .� „• a card N � ram,. �,Moi .c.'^ �.L.�Y YW L'�L D P aLgl rsgn� � N is O •. v�� 1d.p N V.qL Ww LM. N CL C� Vy n V Z A Y 8p„ :�M t11�yJ C¢�i L pp UU 6A �w.� M•�,L. N _W.. OI aA y C•� P f� G wN 4al d O.. �C C MGM �. �. �.A C �r�.Q "'•O .�. W i�w NY OY� wyC Yy�LYC C?�. IJ m 4 C e ..0 CU G� AdNC L.:L.. U.Vw �C CwA O= O. MV. w Ca�1 `)•. dYw 9L �.. .d.gww C` OC` M �Lq� ��CC°'a O �•� u�y•" LawYs A C`O y' �5 Q N�pt3 6� �AC C Bu�u a,� yw p otY L� aL. 7 LAN �` O.CpL C:Id. ooL4). �y Odd.. CY 4y�ynn�•... d : C{'�� OY.. pp ^N Oaf.01 w vL UgYe p nV�9L. �w Wyw C.. Ay -Cc q y UN d >,d 6V.Y NY `W CeyP �VYid.c]{Y y�q CN �gC) � 6q G1 p�Y� G�,� sVJa7 L� N `9 _O NU. N� YM... Y•r Cw C:� yMp Y' da Oe L Lpdp�.C. MY- �� 4id L 00 r�Y >N q LC'Y�.Y �Et ! 6^ V. dq O dCL V1 VyG �a5$o. �ncL� �►r3 2�, ac. W«•yn��u sq�' {�i� Kw `� �aL P. �+�iuW Kaa O q C O Y ■ � `a rJ AU y �1 ON (... V� AWL �N�w:• OV �� �. 'G �y vN•� 4 » ��O C:� Myy�t w.^•CI Ll� Oy Oyy O� Ow{� ` < Or LyYG Y..4a^ray �� Lp 4T �pN YN � `� �< 'J•C� NNNw� p r dy Apy�yp �O yy L Y ��!i� qV. �� A..O �Q y. C q a h L y Y O•N v Y�p.y' �.M �� YO yY LM WpWpWpN! �Cy�OQ� q�4�. q N■CC. NL ^E�`. 1'& Ap g^ N.01� GV 'LLVq HZE VL �■ MVY BOA O.. o' \ � Y.�! 1p•.�p 4E.4: yp Gy 6: q0 • Lam. ^Q^OI y.N d. YW Cly�I� ze pq^C^ C L L N'�+ v q t.3. �9 N t W C uYiSY. Mr Y Y ^��'L�G:, KA�U1 �qC(�N dy.d�{� It g� y N@qN.. aY � aCYt L^W YYNC�Y �45� <�L WA 4. YiA. KLO`1 L�i.- Gtr^`_y~ 09� YVQ q NL OI yi y Y 4CC y YI yY� O.,.NV NpW.q� ^ Q ^3 3 pa 1 �_hy o � co y c 3p E � Q pS. W �. v may. 3-1 a. do's pup.. `o cC o i «c�.. y Vi..L6 MON `' N�W N N V pY5 G►L C33M L YC 3V �.V V 2,26 V: w Y,C�tl Q A ppp��V yi y .. 4 Y V N �Ra A V Pl C yyi L 9s� w T it tlY VM Mg. - q�u9 ■p O Y� Y � �Y py! CL.:C rrl. ua ���.�-. 02� w. 4L^ Y � � My.C• 'ate C o - y� Y^�p +o •.` a Cay wee �' N G ate. NV� L'j"Z Y NY ,. O4 OM Oh', r � GCY Lg Crsv Ns �>ayN.'� 40® $.3 �[ E QT. q �c' YyC CLO YYO drQ C C W'c y M Y 4 V M Y 9 y y ' ■ d Y Y L a p V M�c�C Np V� YO ON p fir. y M Y Nz€V: 9w4Y�H, ,Cr Y _ i` Y: per» Ny >C O/l�.;y C=V` ■� ` O Q O.Q. $ �: 0 i A `Y Y N L p O• N e y 4 16 4 14 •v y N 1 q y pppp y M y �^ A CHiQ p1! 1 4a C LC O� �.�.R�.11.�• Yf� V�C. C� LViy�»19 Y•c`(�C 6M V wOC rY �V t.0 O' .pCaap Opp ypw1C YN.^r CN HMr 4f tWCi.n d$ 6N�+M F7 Y tO. Fes. 'GJ.tiA Z:Dy. 16'•N A.: N C w 1 _ t RESOLUI�ON N0, l i . A RESOLUTION OF THE PLA10MG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 89- J� 08, A REQUEST TO REDI!^E THE MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK FROM, � 45 FEET TO'35 FEEL THE MINIMUM PARKING SETBACK FRO)1;25 (( FEET TO 22 FEF-T, AND THE AVERAGE LANDSCAPE DEPTH FnO 45 t' FEET TO 39 FECT FOR A Slr.000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE f,4CILITY ON 4,6 ACRES OF,LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOU71EAST-,'6PAER OF MILLIKEN.AVENUE AND 6TH- STREET, IN THE-N is RSAL- PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 12) OF THE INDUSTRIAL "SPECIFIC .PLAN, AND MAKING. FINDINGS-IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN:'. 229-341-02 and 04. A. Recitals. (i) Genesis Real Es!: te has filed an application for the issuance of the Varianc6, No. 89-Oa as" described,, in the title of this. Resolution. Hereinafter in .this'ResoTution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On July 12; 1989, the Plarning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed ,- -0 c hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that dattl (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. ' NUW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this CommiWon during the above-referenced public hearing on July 19' 1989, including writ:en- and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby C specifically finds ;as follows: (a) The applf,:4tion applies to property located at the southeast corner of Milliken Ar'enue and,--th Street, with a street frontage of 560 feet along Milliken Avenue and 340 feet along 6th Street; and (b) The property to the north of the ;`subject site consists of an existing industrial building, the property to the sou;�,h, east, fund west is vacant, 1 PLANNING C6MMISSION Ri SOWTION NO. VAR 8948 - GENESIS"REAL. ESTATE duly 12, 19A9 Page i 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Coamission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in OaragOaphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds aid concludes as follows: (a) Thy�' strict or literal Jnterpret;tl on and enforcement of the specified regu.latilli_ would result-in practical dlfficeaty-orunnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That because existing-street improvements will be widened up to 6 feet along-;6th Street and up to 14 feet along Milliken Avenue, #here are exceptional or extraordinary oircumstances or conditions applicable is the property involved or to the intended ue of ;the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. (c) That strict or lftetal interpretation and enforcement of the Industrial Specific Plan requirement of a building' setback of 45 feet off 6th Street, a Parking setback of 25 feet off Milliken Avenue, and a landscape depth requiremebt of 45 feet .average off Milliken Avenue would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting of th' Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege ,inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the -3me district. (e) That the .granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the 4icinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of t eis Reso luti6►lo APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12Ti1 DAY OF JULY, 1989. PLANNING COt+41SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T, McNiel, .Chair.man ATTEST- Brad Buller, 3ecretary PLANNING COMISSiON :RESOLUTION NO. VAR 89-08 - GENESIS REAL ESTATE l July 12,•1989 Page S I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Comnission`yf_-the-City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the 'foregoing Resolutign was duly and regularly introduced, -passed, and adopted by the Pl,�:nning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetino of the P1zining Conmisrio, 1d on the 12th;day'of J0y, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit, AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: - GOMMISSIO3 ERS: ----- ,` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT AML IW P _ -� DATE: July 12, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: 8`rad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: CAR WASHES IN NEIGH80RHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS Attached is the Memorandum of Unde^� ding re' nested 6y tna Commission. However, based;upon discussion of the City Council it their Ju`y 5, '1989 meeting, staff is preparing, an Ordinance unending the Development Cods to estai,lish standards for car washes. This Ordinance will be presented f at your next meeting for your considerati;n. Re ec ully m 1Y Bra e _ City, anise BB:ko M , I i f I (� ZTIqx L !1 CITY�OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M14MORANDUM c n O 1977 July 12, 1989 CAR WASHES IN NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DIMRICTS This Memorandum or Understanding has been prepared at the Planning Commission', direction regarding car washes in Neighborhood Commercial Districts. Based upon the discussion of the Commission at their -June 14 meeting, staff understands- the. Commission's thoughts regarding car washes in Neighborhood Commercial Districts to be as follows: 1. Car washes provide a neighborhood service which is consistent with the intent of the Neighborhood Commercial District regulations; and therefore, are an appropriate use wi`.hin residential neighbo-hoods, 2. Car washes should continue to be considered a "conditiono use', rather than a use permitted by right, subject to t'ie review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit by t�e Planning Commission. 3. Car washes should be designed sensitive to their surroundings, including, but not limited to; o Locating staging areas for .gashing and vacuuming as far as possible from residential uses. f o Orienting wash bays to screen from public ,yjew, fparticularly along streets. L o Providing a c dmlbInation .of- techniques fW "buffer-" the use from adjoini;;n less inten�ie usrh, including setback, walls, art a:se evergraen l+,fdscaping. o Providing on-site management, to discourage loitering, noise, or other nuir es or crimes. Hours of operation that are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. In addition, staff will add to the work program an item to develop more detailed guidelines end standards for this type of use. BBiO4zko CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Aftk STAIFF REPORT , DATE: July'12,, 1989 TO: Chairman and Vembers of the Manning Commission FROM: Brad Bull2r, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: THOMS WINERY OAS INVESTORS - A request to modify color of lign fixtures; and corcre a surface and color of sidewalk and fountaiii:,plaza near the Ppothill/Vineyard intersection. I. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting approval of certain modifications to materials. II. BACKGROUND- The Thomas Winery Plaza (CUP 87-26) was conditionally approve the Planning Commissian oh, January 27, 1988. The approved site deveiopment plans (see Exhibit "A") indicate that the pedestrian system throughout the center would be highlighted by the use of enhanced paving. The approved architectural elevations (see Exhibit "B") indicate that wall light fixtures and window rulcions would be painted green to provide,an accent color to contrast with the building facade. Phase: z is nearing completion, and the Soupiantation building is cnmpTeted. 111. ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting two design modifications to the Thomas Winery Plaza as described below: A. Light Fixtures:. The Commission may recall previous discussions regarding the light fixtures earlier this year, prior to the opening of Soupiantation. In summar-, the light fixtures were white when installed an Souplanta'tion. `me renderings approved by the Planning Commission all depict green lights, matching the window mullions, mounted on Souplantation and the tower portions of other_buildings. At the request of the applicant, the Design Review Committee (Chitiea, Tolstoy) looked at on-site samples of three light fixture colors - white, greed and gray. As a result, the green was chosen and all fixtures on Souplantaticn:.±have now been ;painted green. l The white color of the parking lot light standards was also reviewed. The Commission deferred a final decision until the ect to, further reviewt0,s the Commission ofonstruction was rhowr theQwhiteuca or would work with the overall tour scheme of the center. The applicant wishes to use the same white dolor on both the parking lot light standards and the wall lights. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF {REPORT RE: THOMAS WINERY --OAS INVESTORS July 12, 1989 Page 2 At this point, the applicant is within a few weeks of occupancy of the remainder of the first phase buildings -Intl requests that the choice of color for the light fixtures again be reconsidered..,," econsidered. Their preference is that all fixtures be white. B. Concrete Surface Color: This issue is in regard to the street adjacent sidewalk around the•=winery; ao well as the fountain' plaza at the intersection. The approved concept around the winery building included a brown acid wash or sand0 ast finish of all concrete around the winery (see Exhibit ",C"). This includes the sidewalk within the public right-of-way. Unfortunately, the developer's engineer did not co0dinate the public improvement" plan with the landscape architect; hence, the approved street plans show standard gray concrete and the approved landscape plans show brown concrete. This created complications with CalTrans and City Public Works inspectors, which resulted in the sidewalk .along Foothill, toward Vineyard, being poured as standard gray concrete. Staff recommends that this sidewalk be removed and replaced with the brown colored concrete, without the washed finish. The Engineering Division will accept colorization, but not texturing. the standard gray concrete remains, the design and color of the concrete surface around fountain is affected. As the approved surface was brown acid wash concrete, it could c�-7trast to the standard gray sidewalk. The applicant is now requesting modifications fro , the original approval in regard to this issue as described below, and as Shawn on Exhibit "D": 1. That the standard gray concrete sidewalk that is already in place on Foothill Boulevard remain as r constructed. In addition, allow the same j standard sidewalk to be used along Vineyard (not yet in place). 2. That the concrete surface around the fountain be a gray acid wash finish rather than the brown I scid wash. (The gray concrete with texture finish has been poured, at the developer's risk that it may not be the approved alternative.) Staff's recommendation to the Design Review Committee was to c. replace the sidewalk on Foothill with the broom finish brown concrete, and continue this .*terial on Vineyard along t"e west side of the winery (as shoran on the landscape plans). This would be per the approved designs except for the q y PLANNING COMFiISSION STAFF, REPORT RE: TNOMAS WINERY - OAS ICIVESTORS July 12 1989 Page 3 aggregate washed finish that will not be allowed in the right- of-way. Within thu Fountain plaza, we would prefer the brown aggregate finish (acid wash) per the approved plans. IV. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Committee (Chitieas o s oy, Coleman) rev ewe Ie,,requeste-d modifications on June 22, . 1989 and recommandzd;the following A. Light Fixtures: moth wall ani parking lot lights should be a consistent green colors match the window mullions, B. Concrete Surface Color: The Committee expressed:,strongly the need to enp as ze s important intersection because it is designated as an "Activity Cents" by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plana The Committee recommended using dolor enrined, acid Wash finish concrete in the corner plaza outside of the public right-gf-way, and using color enriched', brcom finish concrete for the sidewalks along Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, The Committee suggested that a possible compromise may be to allow the gray broom finish concrete sidewalk to remain on foothill Boulevard up to the designated curb radius at the, corner where a transition would occir into the color enriched concrete. Res lly s BA B °er �- ity P pner BB:OC•ko Attachments: June 26, 1989 Letter from Applicant June 7, 1989 Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" = Approved Sits Plan Exhibit"8" - Approved Elevation Exhibit "C" - Approved Sidewalk Plan Exhibit "B" - Prhposed Sidewal{ Plan 110 1` "i '�.?y�r�,��,.'� '+,+�kie�.�,��'tll�ltz'.t*d�S•�u.� . .. mti.r �*d+��"-s�+S'.:. * a.�:i;$:� «s.: 0 A S In • es6Vrs lchard J..O'IveW 208i Business Center Drive Howard Adler SUIte 290 Irvine.Calltornia 927 i 3, Michael L Strauss An OF NG.0^�{(�� (7141833.7700 c= ar�YAL 4lV S'Qas A JUN 2810 PH June 26, 1989 Dan Coleman Rancho Cucamonga Planning 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Dan; Thanks for setting up the meeting with the Resign Review Committee. As promised I am enclosing herewith my thoughts in regard to the resolutioi% of the issues of the ec•lor of the lights and the special pavement,: 1) Color of Lights on BuildiLaAt We could not agree on the color of the lights on the building. We all. want to make this a great 3 looking center — we just cannot agree on the color. I would like to bring this issue before the Full Planning Committee and, by that time, I probably will have received more input from my consultants. 2J Color of Pavement: I have asked my engineer, Pat Brown, to submit a civil drawing to Russ MaGuire, City of Ranch Cucamonga, showing a description of the pavement for submittal to Cultrana. We checked with Caltrans again last week and the inspector still tells us they will not allow any colored paving in Foc:thill. I am willing to change the color if we get permission from Caltrans but I think the Engineering Staff would have to do a lot of the legwork to get approval. I would also like to suggest that we invite the Design Eeview Committee members out to the slPe to deal with both of these problems. Dan Coleman City of Rancho Cucamonga Jane 26, 1989 Page Two I i I I believe we could, some to an s greemen�t a, lot easier if -wb; dan talk about it in the presence of our consultants.' I will meet both of you at your convafi,ance. p-�Seroink Project Manager ' RS:mkc cc: Architects Orange Lynee Deane Barbaro Pat Brown l ' w _ Y 'Y. 'h.l�l^^M�. +e7 f:Y'y�n�a.•7 Y- -HaL_ .LM_,+W YA.yI� aw 0 A S Investors (chardIaNellf 2ot3t Business Center Drive Howard Adler Suite 290 Michael!r Strauss Irvine,California 027[S � (7I 4)S33.7700 CWOFV CM CUMMP JUN `s June 7, 19V AM Dan Coleman. r City of Rar cho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA; 91730 Dear Darn: As promised I am sending this letter to regtest the folio-ding: 1) As Ica know Caltraus and the Engineering Department of.the City of Ranch Cucamonga did not allow us to put in the: exposed aggregate sidewalk in front of the Winery on Foothill. We had to construct the sidewalk according to tare AlIaL specifications of Caltrans which is now a standard grey concrete without the exposed aggregate. As you discussed with Lynne, in keeping irith the continuity in the design of the front of the project, we would like to pour the rest of the sidewalk on Vineyard with grey concrete without the exposel aggregate, and we would like to pour the area Ground the fountain in an exposed aggregate grey. I ok that all parties involved will: agree to tar a solution and as Lynne explained to me, you agreed to the overall_change. 2) May be I'm Yong, but I thought the color change in the lights' nttached to the buildings from white to green, only involved the Souplantation building. You told me that you expect all the buildings to change from white to grean! Although, as with all the other issues, we are willing to comply, I z,:; concerned that this will not be an improvement. I am willing to change it to any other color but green. I firmly believe that white will best achieve the results that we are looking for - a well-balanced color pattern in contrast to the Winery. Dan,' what do you Chink? ,+ !1A _ Fc f Dan Coleman p Page Two N As I informed you yesterday, we have alretidy poured the concrete , around tha fountain, fully understanding. the risk r%f having, to 1 change it later. r If necessary, I would hike to have LyiGne and myaalf make a presentation on these issues in £ront;of the Design Review Committee. t appreciate',your coneie4a.-atibn of these 4rssues and am anticipating; an early response.(ollV ad elp, t, f traink Project Manager RS:mkc `- N Rudy Stroink � Project Manager RS:mkc i IT t • `_ {� _to �� ,� l Most IAN wiff •: � e I If s� �; 49 :" ff K slit ill 1. ['3 x.a .� �` •!DIY � f:'� �+ _ -M lily►; �`t Y� ��� tires *. i ��yj��- ,� r •'fit_... aw 1 a 4 ' 1� r I or i ca <J m d O tt T G4N to ta 71, Q f C caa m tC °ton m W, m o tf V U iV �a t oa.1U a Lu OR 111? • 5. U3ate � . tid z f a ICU uj i . Mmwgw[m�w mw®mw 1®6s rt®pa.m lli CL ;LU .� aa f1 W® a- O cl) c7 F- x.. rwwMalY A A st CD lu Ar �f CY 4. N .. g CL CL r - -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST"F REPORT, DATE: July 12, 1984 TO: Chairman andMembers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REaUEST TO-ABANDON PROPOSED,-ACCESS B-E�ENFRO� A littELEMENTARYL AND THEEENB L PASEO -- I. BACKGROUND: On.June 9, 1989, st-f received a letter from Etiwanda School District Super-intendent, Carlton Lightfoot, requesting that the proposed pathway+ approach to the Caryn Elementary School si'te:• be abandoned for reasons outlinad in his let*,gr of June 8 attached (see Exhibit "A"). The Caryn, Planned Community know as "Vintage Highlards" is nearing completion. 'The community is designed to be centered on a system f of recreational open space. This0 open space system consists of a series of greenbelts which .are connected to each cul-de-sac street. These'g:-aenbeits or "paseos° tie individual neighborhoods together and provide access to recreational opportunities. The greenbelts are also intended to provide a safe route for school children to reach the elementary School. This greenbelt concept is I ' central to the land plan for the community as explained in the Community Plan excerpts attached (see Exhibit "B")., Back in March of 1989 _following a discussion of the City Council regarding another aspect of the, greenbelt paseos, staff was informed of the potential interest of the School District to close- > off this school access. Staff met with Mr. Lightfoot on the Caryn Elementary School site and discussed several options regarding the termination of the greenbelt pasdo that would not preclude passage way from the north into the school property, but that would limit the type of traffic to pedestrian traffic only. The developers of the Vintage Highland project are now in the process of completing their project and have been requested by the School District to blo& off the access to the school Staff could not issue: the permits for closing off that access in that, it was staff's opinion that closure would, he inconsistent with the Caryn Community Plan and to close it off would require an amendment to the Caryn Community Plan, wh :would require Planning Commission action. %�i , PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 1 RE: ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT � 3aly 12. 1989 Page 2 II. RECOMME�1bATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Co�mtiso on considerthe ^equest of the Etiwanda School District to abandon and block the access to the greenbelt paseo from their sc400l and either 1) determine the request to be appropriate and direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Caryn Cczmnity Plan; or 2) t_. determine that access from the greenbelt pass- to the schoot is an important future to t#te development of the Caryn Cormunity Plan and direct staff to work further vith the.Ctiwamda School District 1 on alternatives that will maintain the access, but limit the type and possibly time of access availabjlity. Res fly tted Er let M;y tanner 88:ko Attachme::ts: Exhii-it "A" - Letter from Carlton Ug6foot of June 8, 1989 Exhibit 1W - Excerpts from the Caryn Community Plan Text a P.O.Box 248, Etwanda;�:alifornia 91739 (714) June 8, 1989 Mr. Brad Buller, City Pilanner Department of Planning 2f City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 "C Baseline Road P.O. Box 807 Rancho,Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Brad; I believe it would be to the ttxtVial benefit of all concerned if the proposed pathway approach to the ale)at_d northern portion of the Caryn j School site was abandoned. Because of-itoe steepness- of the hillside, coupled with the fact that the district plans to place numerous relocatables along the bottom part of that hill, I believe it would create an extremely dangerous, and 'possibly libelous, condition for both the city. and the district. tie would far prefer to have the gully filled in and the`vllock wall' continued across the space where it is now absent. Incidentally, an informal canvas of the residents who are immediately adjacent to the gully indices",,a unanimous desire to have that-'area eliminated. If any furthar clarification is needed, p.e4se feel free to call and we can discuss tt!e situation in greater detail: .Sins`.=rel Carletin F. Lightfoot Superititendent CPL:rg Board of Trustoes : R.G.(Jerry)Bredlar Gary R.Collins David W?Long Carleton Lightfoot i1),,, ? -� f Marshall B.Pruitt Suparinten nt �(,� --3 Ceoilia Sotono a Calryn Planned Community Vintage Highlands Cit ` of Rancho Cucamong � California For: Caryn Company i eu t e +e . .to d. to = Marlborough DevelopMent Coin ration BY'. LandIpjan/Onsigin d0roup JUNE 19$6 8. PROJECT DESCRIPTION \\ The project site contains approximately 244 acres of o alluvict wash,gently stoplgg at approximately 4 I f2%, located at ttu~Iwse of the Son Gabriel Mountain foothills. It is situated in the City of rancho Cucamonga and north of thg planned com�r►unity of Victoria. Th,�, .te is defined by the prbpr�ted Foothill Freeway io the south,the extension of Milliken Avenue to the west,the extension of Bonyilrz Avenue to the north,and tits extension 4f Rochester Avenue-to the east. The propose Planned Cormunity (P.C.).is a singta fam�iy residential community,containing approximately 940,dwetlirm- atbuil('iut of the current z proposed pion. The c ommunityls spc eial identity is a system of open-space that .ties the community together. The backbone of this open spode network is the parkway corridor. 1t lints the north-south pedestrian greenl gilts and the elemebtary school;it'corinects the comm unify to major north-south arterials,and to the possible future co!'rmrap 5enter(s). J* All homes are on cut-de-$=$or closed loop streets which connent to contrclleci.access collector loop streets. These in turn lead to the community parkway road. The arterial roads abutting 'the''P.C.hnn beer. sized to+accornodote passible future development to the north of the P.C. To the south of this project, the right-of-way for the Foothill Freeway is preserved. All streets will be dedicated public streets. Where appropriate these will be maintained,alarngwith the pnrks and traits,Ire an as;;kssment district. Phosel-Is pianneci ar single family detached homes. North of.fhz project partcwoy 5,500 to J 1,000square fraf l"�)ts:r a planned,and south of than parka(,-y 4,000 to Q,dtDQ s4uore foofibis Kaufman& Broad, Inc_ and Martborouah'__! Development Corporation, the two bt:ilders for the site, will utilize both- lot sizes. This arrangement should produce approximately sixteen different basic house'designs and fifty or more different exterior deigns,irk different rotor schemes. Exhibit 4 on the following`page is the proposed T6 d use'plon. i f" r/ 1 ,y I1. LAND USE A. RELATIONSHIP TO CITY OF RANCHO o CUCAMONGA GENERAL. PLAN' The original land use plan was approved in accordance with the County of San Bernardino West Valley Foothills Community Plan, Upon annexation to the City of Rancho Cucamor;ga, slight . modifications occurred. The cure,.nt plan identified in the text and e•'thibits Is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and bas been approved by the City Council. This proposed development is a cowunity of � single-family homes, compatible with Victoria, a planned residential community immediately south of the Project site,, l Each home within this proposed project is d;a cut'-fie-sac which opens up onto an open spa' or 9N nbelt system. Every streetfsidewat.i, system�onnects to a trail network. Each sub-mig*-Lrhood, as defined b�+ an interior loop street, focuses upon a part of the open space system. The park-like character of the project is sur'�)rted at the neighborhood level by a street tree heirarchy for local streets, loop streets, parkway, regional collectors, trails, and community park. The common; theme for this cowuinity is tr,� open space system which provides an overal'i focus and a sense of identity. This project utilizes the road standards of Victoria and Rancho Cucamonga to extend the feeling of that comr.�unity. The character of this proposed P.C. is based ,,upon the idea of an integrated open space system similar to the planned community of Victoria. Like tCictoiia, the proposed P.G. uses a I i network of--open space to link the communIty d to the neighborhood park, the commercial center and to regional open space and tyansportation corridors. Central to this open space system is the parkway which - structurally>clt egrabes the residential I' develr_pmant witt-the neighborhood park, via street trees., trails, and park ipaces, t t -10- Al- , J r ,, r }Alt., UK ME •• a ® 7tliilt lFdN i► . , H ► ,' �� ��1® M/MGM i !r at•� EW& 1■et■i.�;��� if® -1t �il�t •'�►�1=' ,�r;�r��®�,�r sou �nuui �� , .--♦�►'iv'Rlnty _ " .1'-�/'t�i,�lr ,111u kannv_ ® rm dram � ;v: Q�i � y' 111 it IF Billil� W_tr� F� t �I11tar tJltt� 11 !� ' ll 'amail��'1a111 �l�L, , l.��ueer' It►. r.' � ��#®i�;wrliati�i �I11 ,n�ut�► Ott �laa ��i�r ��'rr�r Ilian il�al;E1� !„� ••� 1! 11aRjr� �� !tllt all'Aa i 11 R la as � q i>. r e. Ott• �~' � fA >r EXHI SIT 76 t��t LANDSCAPE ILLUSTRATIVE I Ilk —46- .� !� is Vt. Commumn Y DESIGN The P.C.' .0 Is deQoad to be compatible with isla+r- ned-'cor munit/of Victoria,which rrtjacent'to-t7�e <l south.•The R.C. focuses on an opa�space system f- tohich ties together the whole comn��+ho tY f`» a network of trails and;pork spa e. Tb).e open SPIWf-b Sys- tern provides a sense of i;G- tify forAhe community and access to camrnuai;les.and regional recreation. T landscape palette is;' tigned to be compatible y with the landscape character of established�communi { ties liked;,war�la wd with.,lictoria. As the,�ite \,.. slopes tohe�bGth at 49&; on attempt has Eseen'rnade to keep all the roads at grad_ Where graded slopes occur between lotsy and in accordance with the MY of Raneho'CueWO'Igatcore will be taken to reduce runr)ff and erosion. The toe and crest of any slope over 5 feet �{ (n vertical,height i0ll be rounded and designed in proportion to the total height of the slope. Prior to the plocd ent o£fil''oll slopes greater than 5 fiit will be water� and wheel called! Ali slopes greater than 5' will be hydroseeded and irrigaf#?d. The road systecr,within,the P.C.';`helps to hnthf ,--s-_ neighborhoods onM to tie together the wI ole,,- ,,�,I'n- cty, The loop streaits delineate nelghb�Oik ..-a'W'lthin each neighborhood;p series of cut-de-sec svreets pro- esidents access to their homes to the open space vices r . and park system. The;)arkwoy wider's but whenever a loop street intersects,to provide a--mail park;ipace as a visual terminus. Thus,the parkway ties together all the neighborhoods and the park as itflows through the 11; community. The character of the P.G. and c-. •y of t': , } neighborhoods will be achieved through the use of plant materials. At the Milliken and Rochesty ntrcnces to the ccinmuni,y a low slumped blocs entry 1 sign announces the name of the community to N residents and visitors. Along INillV„n,Banyon and tocheaer Avenues,and the Foot`%ll t=reeway,a decor- at v,slumped blockwull of thescroc' haracter ds the er'ty s;(gns, x"I buffer nose,provide hri+Ktcy,+n+.d I i.;entify the community. Wocden fessces will provide privacy for homeowners along tha parkway,loop streets,'and trails. See Exhibit 17 for entrisign and perimeter wall character. sent Cow-eRVATION AND OPEN SPACE A. PRESERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES The San Gabriel mountains are charWcterized.by e variety of noturai resources. The crr-;.plea Will ar i canyon iandforms whidt supply the Scenic backdrop to he vaI- ley floor also provide the n4Stural habitat for eiildiife, and the watershed for ground water recharge. Much of the scenic value of the regional pl mg area to is attributed io its natural features., Der-,ic-i ment Impacts will be�mininsized by proper <<planning and management. Attention will be given to proper grading practices,to conserve topsoil and pre- vent erosion. Contqur grading techniques wiil be util- ized to blend with thhee existing natural terrain and I where possible,graded slopes. If approved by a soil engineer,grades may reach a maximum rltio of I-i/2al;aria when used for o�ontauring purposes--In limiter;oreas. To maintain the feeling of the rmturol landscape and to integrate this project into `e adjacent'communil tes, - attention will be given to the use of landscape iii�ter- iais that of a native and/or drought 1oleront,and which are similar fat those found in adjoining c�. tmunities. B. PRODUCTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES Within the vicinity of the planning area, - #here are two known reserves of high quality aggregates m,essential building riiaterial. It is likeiy that extraction operations will occur some distance north of the P.C.. However,production of these materials is not economical on the:project site. C. OUTDOOR RECREATION in addition to the regional recreational opportunities which have been described in Sections IV.D43),Con.- munityFacilities-Parks and Open Space,the project' wil I provide a pedestrian oriented open space system. (Exhibits 3, 13,and 14). The open space system is based apart a greenbelt concept in which project cul-de-sacs took onto the greenbelt trails. These greenbelts aot as a'Continuous open space element tying together individuak saeighbor- hoods into a coherent community. These greenbelt t corridors also:provide access north of the site to regional recreational opportunities. This project pro- fAft ! 5oArid4rnardino County,Wes(Valle F'ooj�lis` CommunitX Plana 0983),p D2-t 1. -54- 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAVION A �r STAFF REPORT Ankh DATE: July 12 2989 TO: Chairman and M4mbers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Killer, '3t1 Planner SUBJECT: DESIC� OF MEMBER TO SERVE ON THE CENTRAL PAR:1 LIBRARY A Preliminary Design Sub-Committee is being. foaled for the Central Park Library. The Planning Commission has been invited to designate one Commissioner to serve on this Sub-Committee. rRe is ull it /�8�at r f Git� Planner ! Wgs ' Attachments: Exhibit "A" June 28, 1989 Memorandum.from Linda Danipis t' i0 _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ----� REDEVELOP:.._`t1T AOENQV MEMORANDUM DATE: June 28. 1989 TO; t ianning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Friends of the Library FROM: Linda Daniels,Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Designatloa,c1h1ember to Serve on the:Central?ark Library Preliminary Desigin.Sub-Committer. At the June 22st meeting of the.Redevelopment Agency,'City Council, It was determ:inrd that a Preliminar, Design Sub-Corr..�qittee should be composed of repeesentatives from the Council, Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, the County, Friends of the Library. and ar. interested resident. 'file purpose of the Sub-Committee Will,be to determine the basic "footpilnt" and components of the building. The group will be guided by an architect especially.'selected for tt.As �i rsignment,-an(4,the result wilt be plans-that car.be submitted svitr�,an application for r�, consumWon grants This commitmer'will iric ude approximately four znGnths of evening meetings, a tho-,,h the frequency and days of tl�e meetings haven't been determined yet. The Council hav:.requ€sted that each commission/committee dealgnate their own representative to this I' Sub-Committee by July 13th. By following this time frame, the Council wili:be able to forrr gHze the selection of the Sub-Committee at their July 19th meetlr;i. i Please call LeAnn]c,ust, x248, with the name of your_group's designee k by Thursday,%A JYv 13 1989. If you have any question.about,thy.Sub-- Committee or,>._..iedule, please call LeAnn or me. Tharik.yeu c.,t_y much! 0 1977 B