Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1989/08/09 - Agenda Packet
MY OF P.ANCE O aCMWONG ' q " a�1I�vas'., COMMISSUN } ZAi ► 147T ' WEDNESDAY ATJGUST 9,1989 7-00 p.m. UO.XS PARK GOMMUNfI'IL d9111TBIa 9161 BASE LINE UMCHO CUCAlKORGA,CALII}OR$NIA `e L Pledge;otAllegiance U. Roll Call Commissioner Blakesley __ 0=14•jioner BW!el CaYmissioner it" 0xrmissloner Tolstoy Ccnm ssioner Minberger IPL Announcements IV: Approval of Minutes Jurw 28, 1989 Adjourned Meeting of July 6, 1989 _,Adjourned Meeting of July 20, 1989 July 26, 1989 ti y. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. TNT will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. if anyone has concern over any Item, it should be removed for discussion. r A. DESICN REVIEW FOR VESTING TENTATIVE 'TRACT 13890 HOMESTEAD - The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 91 lots (Phases 1 and 2) of a previously approved vesting tract map consisting of 166 single family lots on _r 40 acres 4f land'in the Now Medium Residential District,located, at the north side of:Highland .Avenue, south of Banyan,west of Deer Creek Channel-APN: 201 27,1-13 14,33,34,41,&42. VL PuH,,, lleairings jj The following items are public hearings in which concerned'individuals may voteq,their opinion of the related project. Please,,wait to be recognized.by the Chairman and address Erie;Commission by stetting your,name and address. All such opinions shalt be'limited to 5 minutes { per individual for each project. 13, ENVIRONMENTAL: ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PER511789-22 -RICHARD'S BEAUTY COLLEGE-A request to establish a beauty college in a irased space of 5,140 square feet within an,;;xisting building in the General Commercial Distriet, loated In,the Deer Greek Village Center, Unit#21, on the west, aide,of Haven,south of Church-APN; 1077-401-29. (Continued from July 2601989.) f C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL; PE ,MIT 89-20 - DEEDEE'S DANCE STUDIO The re u4St o establish a dantie studio in a leased'space of 4,080 NuarE feet r within an existing,.busine(',s'pa_rk on .8.72:.aores:_of land in the: Industrial Specific Plan,('Gbam 2).Located at 9047 Arrow Route,1 . . Suite I00&110 APN: 209-012-19., D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-10 - AMPAC - The request to establish,Wtside store a within a Southern California Edison easement f 13.73 acres in the Heavy Industrial Development District(Subarea 15)of the InduMrial Specific Plan, located on the south side of Arrow Route,east of,and adjacent to,the Devore Freeway,-'APN: 229 121-16.'`Continued from July 20,1989.) E. Vi1'R1ANCE 89-09-AMPAC-A,-.1quest to ullo�v landscaping as a, method of screening an out doo3'storage area fm a regional trait: Landscaping and 'storage area to be located on, a Southern California: Edison right-of-way of 13.73 acres in the Heavy Industrial..District(Subarea 15)of the Industrial Specific Plan,on the south side of Arrow Route, east of, and adjacent to, the` Devore Freeway-APN: 225�22 16. VIL New Businesa F. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 8944-TOM TALBOTI`-Anappeal of staff's decision denying tl, removal of six mature eucalyptus trees at 10121 Whispering rest Drive. APN: 1074-111-02. VITL Director's Reports £ fB a.L_� A -. 1. i..''' G. CHINO BA..IN MUNICIPAL WATER.: DISTRICT REGYONAL _ PLANT �yv. _ :,r�l Repot, M-iatroductory-presentation icy. - Chino Basin Munteipai,Water District concerning proposed water treatment plant to be located on the southwest corp_er of Etiwand'a Avenue and 6th Street. 0 H. ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REQUEST TO ABANDON PROPOSED ACCESS BETWEEN THE CARYN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL-AND TuE GREENBELT PASEO .. ,STATUS OF MULT-NFAMILY DEVELOPMENT (Oral Report) - A review of residential development as it pertains to the City's single family/multi-family housing mix. (See City Council report.) W. Commission Busmeas' ; X. Ps►bue Commenu 3:• This is the time and place fGT;the general public,ta address the ;) Commission. Itemq to be discussed hone are those which do riot already appear on the s agenda. XL A*ammeftt The Planning Commission has adoptedA`ddMinistrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shallt<s heard,.'only-with the consent of the Comm,fission. } i 1i I 11 c"' " MR IRW VolWITY i i wror,ns ,aeon, s ' • owns� - Nwara • • , t+ hJ na® mart s = so ,ear aeesnu n ,9M F (L a—Lb" -w Y . r4,r earl C,rs'NfLL 'x.�ss,:.0sewa rya i ,aoa:e SJ w er.�m►� f5$ So GO i �. 40 pp CUCA.O g!l-CUA2T, Cepftl R ICM1 i.i. aJtearg r�tiltwLnor,4µ eraa�r, - G61'T1 � `'!S➢ cuc CITY OF R�NCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE; August 9, 1989, TO. Chairmzn and Mambers of the Planning Commiss4on FROM; Brad-Buller, City;Planner ` BY. BeVerlyr Nissen, Associate Punter P SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR'VESTI,--,{ENTATIVE TRACT .I3890 - HOMESTEAD The design rev ew 4i ding a evat#ans and detailed site ' plan for 91 lots %faases 1 and 2) of a previously approved j vesting tract map` tlnaf!sisting of 166 single family lots or-SO acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District, lopated at the nortlt side of Highland Avenue, south of 8e,yan, west 1 of Deer Creek Channel,- APR; 202-21343, '14i 33, 94, 42, and - 4Zn If%1 i I. PROJECT.AND SITE AESCRIATIONs A. Action Requested: Approval of building elevations and plat Amok p ans, B. Project Den. sit 4,13 dwelling units per acre. J C. Surrounding� Land Use and Zoni North - Vacant approv esting Tentative Tract 13800, Phases 3 and 41 Low-Medium Density Residential District (4-8 dwellinrj,units per acre) south - Highland Avenue (eventual Route 30 Freeway) and vacant; Coax-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling cinits per acre) East - San Bernardino County''lood Control (Baer Creek Channel); Flood Control West North of Lemon Avenue single -family residential, Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). South of Lemon Avenue - apartments under construction; Medium-Hi h Resi-4,entiai (34-24 dwelling units per aareT. j�Ff ITEff A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 13$90 - HOME5TEA0 August 9, 1989 Page Z L. General Plan Designations: arodect its'�e Love-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per ache} North - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units"per acre) South - Low-Medium,4esidential (4-8-dwell;,)g units per acre) East - Flood Control/Utility=Corridor West - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and M'ediam-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre{ E. Site Characteristics: This site is Phase I and 2 of approved Vesting entative ract 13890 which consists of 40.G acres. The site is presently vacant and slopes uniformly to the southwest at 5 to 6 percent. Vegetation on the Site' is limited to onative brush and grasses, With avoimal life consisting of rodents and native birds. It. ANALYSISc A. General:, Vesting Tentative Tract 13890 was originally proposed by Acacia Construction.`" The new owner, Homestead Bevelonn"int, is seeking approvM of their house prodsct on 91, lots out of the 166-lot tract,:, The applicant is proposing four floor plans which range '':in size from 2,25e to 2,919 square feet. Three elevations for each floor plan are proposed. All of the floor plans .ire two-i„tary. Vesting ;Tentative Tract 13890was ,.approved' by the Planning Com-isSioa-on- Aitne B,'—ga., At that time, side yard setbacks for 'the Low-Medium District were five (5) feet on each side. Since the date of original approval, the Development. Code has been aranded to increase:side yard setbacks in tha Low-Medium District to 5 and 10 feet. The applicant, however, has vesting rights with this application and the old setbacks of 5 feet on each side still apply. The applicant Was, in most instances, proposed side yard setbacks well in excess of the minimum requirement. 8. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee f 8 akes ey�icN a reviewed and approved the project on July j 20, 1989 with the following conditions: 1. The front yard setback on Lot 52 should be increased 5 to 6 feet. Aft PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 13890 - HOMESTFAQ August 9, 1989 Page 3 1 2, Driveway widths at the public right-of-way should be reduced where possible. 3. Planter areas are to be 'provided in driveways, between the 1--car and 2-car portions of the garage. 4. The freeway sound wall should be consistent with that which nas been;provided for Tract 13823 to the west. Pilasters with a decorative cap should be located between Lots 17 and 18 and between Lots<20 and 21, and at property boundaries. 5. Return walls.shouid. be of a stucco material and may be offset at tho property line. Some type of pilaster may be located at the property line. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS,. The project is consistent with the Development Code an the General Plan. The project, with the recommended mitigation measures, will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or _cause significant environmer,.tal impacts. In addition, the proposed use is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. - IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Plannine Gommisss,on approve the Design Review for Phases 1 and 2 (91 lots) of Vesting Tentative Tract 13890 through adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions. Rec 1 Fmit d, Sr r d Cit anne 1 BB:BN,mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit 108" Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" Rough Grading Plan Exhibit "D" -- Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" Phasing Plan Exhibit "F" Tract Map Exhibit "G" Building Elevztions Resolution of Approval with Conditions i r' A-3 13890- SUEE UTILIZATLON MAP i Lrn -4;t ---- 41 l MN , r � P ••a 124� s.., e , a Pi..4NNIIG U[VL-"K)bd �,, EXHIBIT:A SCALE: I �� ��� ��� - ��t �l i� . � = a i�,��_ , a �� �1� ,� �� � l '��= ; i f�;o ��,, ,�i _� ,� �� r/y�"r'�ww��;r�i��w�xesaae�a�s�rrsi—tea�" 0 �� li !p'nib-- '�1���.. .. .__.._ _._., _. _. . .__._ ,, 1 .. s i �� �!� � . � � �y e ` � 'i � �, .;: 4 o l `a Original P©or` IMF Q�;ait m 41 *'9 Alp ANIL * 1 1 ! d Ij �^ NUM GIFT' C fTr.MI=A5 , 19® Ii CtJCAIVI Tom_ AMA/ PLANNING DIVI IC)N 1 =7 EXHIBFT- SCAiE !!Zo H��r. i� '` '"`"�•.r i"""- � i"sae'[" ii 171NAM k �� P �� � to �• ,�1,� � low- ` -r111 1Il - �, Iy �ark }1 +� r'���. `• A 1 Ale OR �C�i aip li ;; my _�•' ° '. � - ` ��� � � C .T it .� CITY OF ti'm / N MrA MU, PLANNM DV tS EXHIBT - SCA LSE- r. A--ra 1 a,, fly am it1EO If ..a � AFv NORTH CITY CF TrEM,RANCHO - A � ■C l 6.T.F ��L✓L�7d.��Pif I, R-ANNM DPVISMEXiiIMT- SC;ALFE- _ , 67p ii ff •�_- sue=' �► 4 r —j+�+e<�� t { lt� c� ® .ary `1 q. +i tea ' NOKM CIS CF nmm_ / � b, u h �'1Ir n4 h u� K 1 t � R y a r tiiy �� tit V i I,ran RANCHO CUCAMONGA TM.E.- PLANNING � s err t'r a6.w I I 1 I I gi Y j j NOM CITY OF MEW Ida RAINUM CUCAMUNCA TrrLE -; . n ANNING DWIMN EXHINT.- _SCALE. a• �z . �wreer MIa MRM I4r r1.a I ��e M.+.GI'MMaOa 7YPMR-�� `����!fe�•� • I —_.i-mil I_�1�1L✓..i+i r _40, au ` t: . a j NOUR ��-ry OF RANCHO C LJCAMQNCA T -. t 'o PLANNM DIVIMN EXH! . _ SCALE, tf, � x r 51 J 1 r 1 t ".1111101 wig, M1,11 ri■i low` Mal Ao Ab 111 A. ■� '�=fit ���! 1►� ��J 1 i� �ti>t I pin r `a ♦' I ,77iff 1 V. • ® s. j �`'-�. •'�L�, � ".mil-.= 1 !�' A `4 'g I.ati } lm ;OP y' ` - .f All .. � ♦' .MC rTa,� l Sim �y ,1 t� I - fig f , 1--t) ♦ = 11 . , E 1 ai�Ii�`-_ �_�� i t._,, 1 to��� �_■r • r'y�i i .-i � s�. r� �• VF. s r�rY, IlanInIgIn 1� OM W, INK ,4 3 ♦ aril w! ♦,{: `iSit` - it i aril■ �, a. �� ` END t � r RESOLUTION NO. Ask A RESOLUTION OF llE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REV1--4. FOR PHASES 1 AND 2 OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13890 CONSISTING OF LOTS 1-65 AND 141-166 ON 40 ACRES OF LAND IN THE 'LOW-MEDIUM DISTRICT LOCATE AT THE N '.TH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF BANYAN, WEST OF DEER CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 201-271-13, 14, 33, 34, 41 AND 42. A. Recitals. (i) Homestead Development hit ,Tiled an application for ne design Review of yract No. 13890 (Phases l and 'Z) as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred tows "the application". (ii).- On -August 90 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a mating to consider the application. (III) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution'- have occurred. 6. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. . This Commission hereby specifically finds that-all of the facts set forth in thi Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Gormnission during the above-referenced meeting on August 9, 1989, including written and oral staff reports—this, Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. A. That the proposed project Is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and B. That the proposed design is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and C. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of th(. Development Code, and 0. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improve;ents in thrtAl vicinity. i i PLANNInC COWRISSIQN RESOLUTION NO. VTr 13890 - HOMESTEAD August 9, 1989 Page t 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 anal 2' above, th's Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condity n set forth below and in tf.-; attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated horein by this reference. . Planning Oiyision 1) The front yard setback on Lots 52 shall be increased 5 to 6 feet. 2) Driveway widths at the public right-of-way shall' be reduced where possible. 3) Planter areas shall be provide in driveways, between the 1-car and 2-car portions of the garage. 4) The freeway sound wall shall be consistent with that which has been provided for Tract 13823 to the west. Pilasters with a decorative cap shall be located between Lots 17 and 18 and between lots 20 and 21, and at property boundaries. } Return wall shall be of a stucco material and may be offset at the property line. Some type �f pilaster may be located at the property line. -6) The perimeter yail shall be compatible and consistent wi,Vt' Tract 12873 to the west. Whet- the wale is cnstrueted, it shall be designed to minimize any potential double wall, wall relocation, or grade differential conflicts that may result with,' the project to the west when it is constractar; " This shall be indicated on the final landscape plan which sbail be reviewed and approved by tie City'Planner.. 7) The ret ` wall of Lot 1 shall' be inset approximately 15 feet fam the property line and shall intersect the corner side yard wall at an approximate 3a degree angle. The same treatment shall apply to Lot 52. The resultant triangular of land adjacent to the curb shall be annexed into a Landscape Maintenance District. This. shall be indicated on the final landscape plan which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer. i PLANNING COMMISSIOtt RESOLUTION NO. VTT 13890 - HOMESTEAD August 9, 1981-4, Page 3 8) All return fences/walls in public view -' tall be decorative in nature and subject to approval by the Design Review Committee. Said fencestwalls shall be indicated on the final landscape plans. 9) Lots adjacent to the Medium-High Restdential project to the west aree to be screened from it with a dense planting of evergreen trees along the eastern side of the perimeter wall. This, as well as a permanent irrigation system, shall be noted on the final landscape plans which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. Engineering Division: 1) The developer shall provide a. secondary means of access for Phase III from the northerly termination of "G" Street to meet existing pavement on Banyan<Nlenue to.the no,-th or Ghandon Place to 'the west, 4. The Secretary to this. Comrtission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH rAY bP AUGJST; 1989. PLANNING COeWSMN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: —"`` .arry T. McNie , Chairman ATTEST Bra j u er, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secr-atary of the Planning Coamission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of August, 1989, by tNe following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: \ t 1 »6YOYyy y4g �+iYY..py =4 c� pp at y9 LYy 1 V` L>> WpY C {.YY 2 tyy� A�q.M N6.YG ` � &1% S "a i�L'V Offg. 11yO yag L.aY F +� ��yff s C9 2l-» q� W s n's.a q w hpyK•� �07�� �Y�� y� Y)O� 4� p� ��1 p 4G Q O;Y .yc =b ��¢¢ fnaapps� Y _ r�CV Aw1Y^.y�L�Y 4C:�Rp ��JUA .�YL V�Q. f.Va . U ills pp qq > G LL^ c Y CL 'z^ ;�u8 Ne &Qe d�rYdo�c ca b �cCYp ya�.r@.iis. N33yy »V yq. " da�o4 Ew0,I.Ax. k.9 ASCI M f .Y LYw' 7.F .pt� HIM! AML s - � Y . BY u s CHI � � •'�� " �' �� fig" �°�;�� gill: +» , to qsq giy �«p p .ice. N w-' �.w Q. � V �• iw~i7�tlYWiNw „� T tQY cggygggy Cf!• p.Y lJ..,, Y�.w Y Lw y-ssO rrV� {{��Mt -p L ✓M fN~ Oya� L'V LPO�.�'QV b.�G6'Ypb GCV S o�uY�1pee4 �35 N UPI ��$�� 3gyoMMMi� � �y�� QMa o w g Oi G4 NA +C wLi rw'•'b v�~ q.. w IN R �$3S■$ G$1tiN �fi� J �•y�B "'fie'$ °�O1 r � •1” .�.�qj =Qi� �Y�y�.^Yy� L+LO��.wwow EA�,ANY�. •"",g � a,S'�� « •+' 64� �nNWuL b.yw�y�e L�! o,ww �w �'� a.. NV.OY�t IIq L w•M 41�.i��J+�y ae(.,..L�4~iAe �tG^�yi .�+ C&46 Tyg dxx. M4 C0� .•"iltl1.Q� yN r"GL H = g35 g3 Ny $a o` -5 6Ir� p �y wV S&9e N•G�^m6 qpS. Vr ``ppOp4 a lfy�.s NP.C�f�i N `pN`�p��[['' 9dLVr„�C�. 6La ppJ�•.M ~q2 Q,ya r� co LV1 QA.GV4w •'���i N�y�w�OMf Y�Ntl A� eO1 • O. cf d-11 c'ew of Z1i,Rh`.3w$ Goa � cIN $`�F. +aC � � o'e 15 Nueva o.E ar w. : .. .'si !'Z'e� ba. wg3� o� as�eAy, c Hit! y_6, Y a4�s rog:I`iS. .�.' 4$a� w eCa� Y' $►1 Q L 4 t"]• L V tq 7 It. 4 ii!. *. Y i•+6 C c N b-cyy•y V Q qq'q L'�'4 a G' t ii_: 34 St �a a�'71�� Z'q4 tC3 yC.�C S y1. L YY�s+:fai��Y !) �� L � 41 •[■'M6 a�•eYw S{iSNNE& Y M e�sNM�Yt+� ,•...ia i5 :c.L.�$, Ynu�.m 1 N y_ a •.V .S.�Y."e L N K. =CCC2 fin r ♦i� $yir @ a �tla a SM Ar Y 19 OO iI Y W S•• 4p�g M t U Mce3� �^ p `K�id�pyd ® �i'i43tl�" .'wyG erey 9N-ax rYL.$y•' .�.- N y' .~p. Qq. 2r. arlq2t dam NS .%T 41 w e a. r A �. Vf1 YI.. N a! IV o^e,a Z-VE�eb y0 a a` .« IL ✓'LL C� M a IQ pqp e yyVpp M 6 ` ?it fff NL�.R¢ Ew bra Y��M y«1�6 M i YY 2j•per 6 7 YYY�. �Cy(u py OR N M a j-P M Bin v Tq■p 4 yN ■,qV i.^ N{°�y�'�M t>• +i➢ M �e1r N M'¢iy61N QyN YCC 011w.�M Ly eHy� 9:s u'1Cy Nam' 4�j� asc t4 z �n r . a<M s ai N a a, , Me oabau«m;Yi i+a� -a a y E. ss a1� CyG�p{3!"e►�6 Ei's Goo bQ'l 6N N R1tQ1 q.V Oi�+ ��IC 3`ryCry fy�.! LCpSY 19 14iS ♦ LN�� Y.! � Y �.w �wlLf wyC�t9 q.N�Ci �$LAy G w�El $i�Fo 5M g, y�$ � svYbo�`aOa»Vo asv�}owl`` � a•t{p°$$ CVlTb Y Y �+ 1 W. Uw u 6b .G.CO QYv4NN.0 Oh3gM wU NY�Y. Lw ;L Qbya "a_� ygoNvl l#u p c ¢ggC�yN yy^f� EO «�N �^ OYV� GAb•l �p mg3 q^q' ^bib 4 4 1 Y+ - 4 'i�.. M.6+0.0 N N C �G N w N -4 �»�.M. •wf pI Nip ao c^N.� _ �:vSet NA"G a r bit! '». +s3.. V 'r'ycy.Y erF :�N o�' Y 12 y� i 2....�'y. c q Zci bw ...'C� ��. yy# Ct Yy _>rU+yL+y��WH LYN�4 j�c ® N.5 0 D3 Y:5C 6y� 2ME a�i 6G$+LSY�M w M! Ab adh�-. L^O Gs~ A� Ow*44--Oay�QW tAUO�T Mt �lYN� O F p 19C SN SIO� w :fz LAA� �.. N ttd % �Sg0.q.,4y1g.�,t{c� —. MM.i +IG Oyl1 ~{NI y4Y .p!^q tl. ,rLe ~�MZIV �Yylb_ y q.Mp�. Y 7 s.. �y:� ^n 4 1N• 04 'cad �bWO Y ! aVq UN NL„ y. • fit *Q y! CS yNy&4 '4.N w N WY +ic c.s1, 'Y5 evR' n �r �� Dw Qom+ b' wuuygwleeY 6Y'C up"NYfI�� w �pRy :J�,9 � ba y�x4G�+9Nt1 N Rs (UN� fn pp�� u Gy C. M'�a fa1� Ygl yNyvy$9y+ {q�y.�(Qp�� Q 6 �� Gi^M- LN�q^ NN6 ■11 �:4N� yY.� �4C��P.ils6�i Cl g�M�{GyybpC yy 4���� r'.� YqCH.��.yt AOL . NO;N q.r +oG ws� K�o 9ND /wb Ni 4iVVir iM:�ts a.GH <.6� 6,. .IGV 4.�04N. M LLi GEC r.�' 4"!Mfr MyyQq .2Gl a [�1 _C � 7Cm - b1 a`GNas^$wg... �NLa eaTylq f-4BS+�NLWyYI NusQ.94 4,27 �16ee �aM yg SC Y V a� i w � 4 t!N qp �91 pYO NCa�q� a� Y'rp wqN ytlM q NN S q! NI.� i S 4 4 W M' "y S~ H1. N : Y 4,4 f 4. A yYy i• S N a new - Q.�.., 3 3_'^. C f,. Y w!Ci Y� 2 E'�w 6.� G N.O i11 w` q6 W1u q� 'G 4 R + t C Y Oy D V tyWy� VNVb � F:J•� `y.� gN � 678. py N �QwV,�eG yC eD.� p q. s w� ewO�Siu d N $ 4en i+ s ag�o i,u m r.�L'N g a �.e � a er„r�.�. o: — 3d'" e<a 'i. 'Ova �~ t ¢N'o m e N L' Z". .R.n'b'.. aci orb;� Tc yMNN qy ^w Y pub, yS 4 yqq■r'>Y M m2 yuµ 4"e-ayigj .0 UC �•yy us 2 O CCC O• .-\WOI ���� • Eb0 L Mr�yyr G Oz+ aN OV-JJII � N.� �l y.Rj�4.,tiC^ O •y Ry t•L2 O �R•• � 5. Q+ yg� SM+�� MYO � Yo yNl��^ •ONtN ®- �: �. . qpwQUCai;,N. c "" y�Qu q°t 6i.SVa wVtY {� C4 ;^� 4 acts Uaw tri«S�yY �'QQ"{yy Yo'y�. CUL:A Y9~Stfe S•, ca a q V s p kas-, ,Y.ZG "^.� W --5 YMdt nb.� NS.M«» 4. :. �qCY ^ N ' q O y^ Y�� q q� 4 $ate ^q q d ic35 �w 3y j $. .fC o.. aa. C N y�3 a q .N +G•OCS �. .'Sw. �gN g Ate^ ' $S Y`v"• L•+wa. w {{•. t Q y■ O V y � VC4 NC^" 6YYR.Yl ~S ^q p O-�� ®C H�IC NI ¢a`i� N��NC�WY q aN O^I U.Sir Cu_�L �tLA /Y �WgY Pssi ^ ~xV V1 '4O �OV Nu - q N!•SfffYYY is .i- ;:a M,OL�Y�GUUtff +f�w.aL N i 1 •Y•�'d. �.. a6 �7y AA OL}[. •(LB.T M 1•i. lyr}L 1H.q�eft M � L�w q�Y� �.NYy v. 6�0¢7 4N9 GMlN� .guy � ;•F�q yYq9{� ANY Y1TL6 Y C Y4 V-'.s h'$raf5 a�'sr.�7C�..A% N OR! I$I qC♦q ttiyJJ1 �M 3) �p� ur C C G..(�9pj'. 4Ct� L 4@ Vs 2�9 V N i 4 6�6 •.(.'j i YUy .11 S ®J 4 n `~ tlQ` a.,. V.1 �Np•M Q R ppL yp} U .I eJJJN}{{ U 44 B a C C. O 4Stl� b aLa y& ^p� LNG U SahppR wq E 6p0��i i YR� �' ' > uf �RG�'. w .O Rg ^Sy{-:.�1� " V w i N V V C O Y v. W O Iw. N yq ®ss7 N.. #a N E Y r NV �� $� � O O �� L"i) MG �OL G 3 '°�. as yam{ q®} Vu y Kr qC `$ a�¢CV` g. ya, �� q� Ley/.. �. NV 1 f g;' Ba is 9+°i ? .�srp .qyy H. qq �: sap ��H �P va�p b q N G K M Net MQ�9•xt Yy `.-L� pw ill MY�N1 b M ^A � •tit j � ill �}9LYyvL: oR r.� '1S RN 7 LV fI Wq¢L¢�.M4 L_t aT O Q 14 w.C1 V.i q ylw db ` K�r: 4�Kws. •da� GitNo VC Wb os' �c.•iV I', CC a LY Iw L C O C M� N 1`Yy d T.� r�oa Qs wayy�s A' c ��r". �Y�Nab O.yyY+. A N Lyy N `. Y y yY•C�. i .� g�i GYC Y CYF�Ai 'M �.• LC� V y C V N ~y ���`(((yggq v 3yA CYCOVW` C�' f' $y Vt aZ 'yamry �Q y.N�M. �L„ Cy �y9 Y M q.+Q� LC. w•+�, Kit WO. ��. A✓ �- 1+ YN u L Gam` CY ^Y �$Q} .C� �.�N�f Y.y S. YG � N Dryp�pO .3, Y'!J C ¢ C V.Y L �'���.^. MC Co 4w� V .aO gq C.�wN 4r QY 8. 4y YO b O w v■C N'l wC. yt Tripp +w mYs y .1L� M N4 C2IJN U V aYY.O. a +s b i. Yr 'OV .w YO�'wa yO� YET 2.LOL C+e,`2 aC10�i dYu +a.AW � SZES pu ayyw u� pp{{.. 44!!Y yOoOP${�pj Cl•. � y � Y O.F� Ov ., �» L1 V 3�. OtliM 6L� 4� o O 3p R1+ a b 9 uM .B66s A 5`4^Ys Ys�l y� Lq 4YtiF LCNW Cis`w ji `'yi� -OT.y�^ Y2 w �ll. wpw a�rM!!l9ttt Vf. N :act Yw 4A ~ 1-a �$Yy MM� �wa ay "M y, -i p VL Y Yi NQ4 . �}�v% siq �jV iL 9 Y• t.7 a L L L t� "w{u�Iqsg'Y» ygM �~yy Vir?Yr$ �w � L�aQ �qq yp/;� MC o�whsi9 Q.w CV Yl.. 6 N MaVN Y. \. aI M 044 S.G��A E. PJ 1.f 9 L N. 1,1 Y Yf �N �' CC y� �Mn�jpp�{ cc yf� Iys GgR4 aybY 1t�YW J X eOiXA.�" Y a! tY y Q:MM u�' C ail p - 4a4'b .0 N q I NV Gqq J16 t�.W yv, L Nxx M�IM� N _y Vj tCJ,. � � t N��O YY yfs.Y y. Gy v9y„ie a 54^ LVe20 y 3 t Q i iggl XY. { 4N R qM N N' ,p iyAR H .cC.� w N }q e i NMYEyl j W �rn.ya •R.. o^ O x'R y.Y,. N w Na o? W agig t t. Q. GL 4� C.R. YR.� � 'R� ��Y�'� � 4.Ls Y �O "� ^NW �•d,. '"'w. at � �04_N. C1g4e �yY .N _K Lp�VM ^ �� _L 4� � Y'•g� �4 O VLdb Y Cd o«Otl.., X Y:. Q Y C 44. yyy3yy��� co Itea i y+apYpp �F4+` =1 �g MC t� 't b W Ywy N YAw,y DeYp. Myq F�. le y� !~ Yya�4g 41ii{w� •iT NwA. N yy8 �N�tl 1WL r(w er%g 4 o a333 o 2.1 ice. 4ouY r« C 4`v� ei. �) Q g 4. "'GlGlo��� Jl`R50= ar+`v g'.'& <y ow;: w►'iwt' u $'d �v Gw $ ye. $W saw lti 0 Off. .fin ie ." `y. +�•1 H � G a.e N H ! + � y N M RX fJ VM Y .R. V Ye. +Vl A SZ Y $C � pyY SAwr�' 'A y �► pp l{a OOD111 elf�. 'd�1aq.. T h SE qq g �ir 4 Vt sw gyp9w e� 7 a } M . 7p`Y ++-00 at ib� hni jib Ga W4 i.++max t �y. y q.Y C. +rQ�•g, �S~ j wNY Y...06R 5 O .`�*y 4NY N' 1Y A iOW :cBF� • 1, 3b �o o b8 h. +; HE L Y' .5 g V b o s^ O cc p TuCR AA+ p yy p S!L Ask O C��nydY � �Qii ppL L"N 1M� Y y � C14�. YY MAY. w® al a YbV�+ PVC Y V 6 Y V� YY O.O�i Y. +YY•� G b f.r � 0 �^� C�. 3b � g� �htg w da s o = 43 as M w O Vr V R aa ii _ p M... eQ �4Y • •Y� NS •Ol+b ^s t� wY p{q wtyy p(y NY Y-JNU � � �.(y�y� � �'MY� 2� Q� �S t�'a V.tl� ✓V.tly H 4d LG O� gab L p P. y■� Sc Y �►5 �Y y61 iY� �Lpwp/M L qqa p O y Mom+ 0.2 V M P Mang b Yb�S^C _ �i q• YN.a Y .ICE /��• 0 4iA lam A.] H O: b Y M a �^�e ----- -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG� STAFF REPORT DATE: August 9, 1089 yA TO: Chairman ar! Members of the Planning Cotmyisszon FROM: Brad Bullfr, City Planner BY: Jerry Guarracino,; Assistant planner SUBJECT': ENVIRONKENTAL ASSESSMENT ARD CONDITIONAL USE rERMIT 89-22 RICRXRD-S BEAUTY LL G - A request to establish a beauty college in a leased space of 5,140 square feet within an existing building in the General Commercial District, located in the Deer Creek Village Center, Unit #21, on the west side of Haven Avenue, south of Church Street - APN: 1077-401-29 (Continued from July 26, 1989 at the request of the applicant) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uested: Review of Conditional Use Permit application to establish a beauty college in an existing commercial center. B. Surrounding Land Use and ZonincL North VacantRetall South. C & C Bakery, Ice Cream & Candy, Vision Center, Empire Bank; General Commercial East - Vacant, Terra Vista; Office Park West - Deer Cree!? Channel: Flood Control C. General Plan Designations: Project site ommercia North Flood Control South - industrial Park East Regional Commercial/Office West - Flood Control D. Site Characteristics: The proposed use is located within an existing commercial center known as Deer Creek. The major tenant is Haven Hills Bowling Center occupying 35,42E square feet. The remainder of the center is occupied by a variety of retail, restaurant, furniture and convenience'outlets. For a complete list of tenants ;and their square footage see Exhibit nDn. E. Parking Calculations: The following is a s►onary of parking needs by use type, i.e., retail, restaurant, etc. For a breakdown of parking needs by individual tenant see Exhibit ITEM 8 PLANNING COMMISSION. STAFF REPORT ' RE: CUP 89-22 - RICHARD'S BEAUTY COLLEGE August 9, 1989 Page 2 Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio SuiraL Provided Retail 33,358* 1/260 133.43 133.43 Restaurant 3,605 1/100 36.05 36.06 Medical 1,,610 1/200 � E.05 - 8.06 Furniture 6800 1/500 13.60 13.60 Pay,t€- Salon 14 stations 3/station 42.00 42.00 Bowling Alley 36,025 . Per CUP 85-37 200.00 200.00 Total parking regd. for existing uses...433.13 413.13 'total parking Available.. .,,,,.. ......496.00 Spaces left for proposed use....,...... .62.87 *A former heavy user of parking, the Deer Craf►k Athletic Club closed it's doors in July 089. Parking for the 10,775 square foot area was calculated at ;_he retail rate of 1/254, ,based on a letter from John Mannerine, Attorney at Law, repreyentirng the owners of the center, stating their desire ;to lease the space to retail outlets and abandon the health club use at tK1 site (see Exhibit "G"): Parking for the beau'.Iy college is bases on a ratio of spaces per station. This is the same ratio as would be required for beauty salons. Parking, required for proposed use. Number of Number of Type Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Ratio Re ug ired Provided Beauty College 21 stations _ 3/sta. 63 spares 62.87 It. ANALYSIS: A. Operation: The applicant is proposing to establish a beauty col e n a 5,140 square foot leased space in the existing Deer Creek Commercial Center. The school will provide classroom training. and practical experience to satisfy the educational requirements of the California State Board. Hence, the proposed use involves both instruction and beauty salon services. Interior improvements will be made, according to Exhibit "C" and will include -,pace for a classroom, student's 1vunge, facial, room, office, 21 beautician stations and reception area. ,., PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: CUP 89-22 - RICHARDIS BEAUTY COLLEGE August g,`,'989 Page 3 J 1{ The school will provide training for up to 50 students and will be open to the public Tuesday through, Saturday from 8:00 A.M. to 4.30 P.M. The applicant expects to serve 25 to 30 clients per day between 9:30 A.M. and 1.00 P.M (see Exhibits "E" & S. Parking, The major issue to be. coWdered with this proposal is the availability of parking for. the. use. Tne Development Code Section 17.13,040 (o) requires trade schools, business colleges and commercial schools to provide parking at,a rate of one (1) space for each three (3) student capacity of each .' classroom plus one for each, 1%ulty member or :employee. This ratio is designed to accocnkdate only; the "parking need of students. and -Faculty. Beauty parlors, bowever have been found to generate hiah demands for parking. As a result, the Development Code $ectian 17.12.440(f) addresses this creed specifically. The Code requires beauty parlors to provide three (3) spaces for each beautician station. The proposed us—__ Lill be op.e:r to the public and provide: the same services as a beauty parlor, therefore, parking should be based on the more 'intensive standard of 3 spaces per station which would require 63 spaces. Gtsed on the present tenant mix, there are approximately 63 spaces available for this use. It should also be noted that currently there are certain tenants with a higher pa (g demand (e,g, medical/restaurant) than retail; hencet__.-as ' tenant mix" changes, additional parking may be available for other uses. I l C. Land Use: A secondary concern is the compatibility of this use with ad scent uses. No conflict is anticipated as a result of the use. Beauty parlors are permitted in the zone, The instructional nature ol� the use will :iot create any conflicts in the center, prove_1 adequate parking is available- as discussed. 0. I Environmental Assessment: Part I.,Jf the initial Study has been completed by the app cant. Staff has completed Part 11 of the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of tl.is project. II1:. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to approve the Conditional Use Permit, the Commission-would need to make the following findings: 1. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the General Cammerci 'District in which the site is located. i 71 PLANNTNGf COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: CUP 89-22 - RICNAW S BEAUTY COLLEGE August 9; 1989 Page 4 2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental td the public health,, 'safety,, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3 That the proposed Use complies with ee-h of `the applicable provisions of the Development Conte. It is the opinion of staff that�the necessary findings to support granting this Conditional Use Permit can be made; IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The ai `Re ort newspaper, the property posted, anJ notices sent to 411 property owners within 300 feet. of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that thQ Planning Comnissioo adoft the, att'ached Resolution of Approval Res fully 3�b itted, Br le City lanner BB:JG:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C° - Floor Plar, Exhibit "D" Tenant List Exhibit "E" Letter from Applicant Exhibit "F" - Letter Amending Proposal Exhibit "G" - Letter from landlord Resolution of Approval i 1 i I Original Poor Quai 'y 51WWA < T old c t_. 3 ♦ — •trsf0 �4 YiCOQ M • �' �� i• H A f a 1 Y Y r ' � � ♦� 9 3A AU!` � � aaLa 7 iF N71ir �. 4 t Lclw" ww+room .c a ism1t • nlr N al � to II � I NORTF i �WTY OF ITEM: LA,, CHO CUCA ONGA TIT% i nITLA mcmxo � PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: 'r SCALE a Adllk o{� �a Or�g�na &u Wcai ,..; ....... l_ r _ um ffl if ��t�„u=utiwluw=t��=t nir'�l �'Iw.u'=�,�►i� NO3TI 'i CITY OF ITEM: ���� �' rs, �2. I RANCHO CTJ II G TITLE: A PLANKING DIVISION 15-4� EXHIBIT:....SCALE. ' 5 0 01 NORT' ".11TY OF ITEM:..,RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Etocac- PLANNING DIVISION -B -j EXHIBIT. "' SCALE. N—L i `DEER CREEK;T ANTS' �r w� :+xMEyAnDRE5s SO. FOOTAGE -TYPE FAWUHG Vacant !Q}75" Fitness Center rf3./p Togo's Hatery 1995 Restaurant 19.95 7900 #24 Haven, R. Cucamonga Circle A Cleaners 790 Dry Cleaners 3.16 TJ00 126A Haven, R. Cucamonga Travel Agency 21_? Travel Agency 3.89 7900 125 Haven, R. Cucamonga Elito Sportswear 2000 clothing Stor3 8.00 7900 #25 Haven, R. Cucamonga Circle K 3366 Convenience Store 13.46 7900 $23A&B Haven, R. Cucamonga Haven Hills Bowling 36025 siviing Alloy 200.00 7930 #101 Haven, R. Cucamonga Video World_ 1845 Video Store 7.30 7930 1101 Haven, R. Cucamonga Deer Creek Bakery 1610 Bakery 6.44 7890 #20 Haven, R. Cucamonga Old Time Ice Cream 16IG Ice Cream Parlor 6.44 789n 119 Haven, R. Cucamonga Deer Creek Vision 1610 Eya Cara $.US 7890 117 Haven, R. Cucamonga New Friend Chinese 1610 Restaurant 16.10 7890 915/16 Haven, R. Cucamonga Norwest Financing 1395 Financial 5.58 7890 413E Haven, R. Cucamonga 30 Minute Photo 1090 Photo Davaloping 4.32 7890 #13A Haven, R. Cucamonga Priority Hair Design 2110 Hair Salon 27.00 7490 411 Haven, R. Cucamonga Nail Today 1395 Nail Salon 15.00 7890 411 Haven, R. Cucamonga �arstaol5 Etc. 6600 Furniture 13.60 7890 49 Haven, R. Cucamonga Vacant 1910 7.64 Vacant 1610 6.44 Vacant 1610 6.44 Vacant 2785 11.14 Beauty School 5140 Total, lnjS 13 Moving Out in August Total Available: 49.6.o0 CI ' OF ITEM: r ' WING DIVISION .b'8 EXHIBIT , SCALE: chard, Gross Enterprises inc- NATIONALLY ACCRr-OtTFD SCH001.;3 w July_.7, 1980 w P" DSA ! AMERICAN City of Rancho Cucamonga ACAL2LMY Mr. Dan Coleman 41013 tARESR sUBjECT: Richard0a Beauty cuilege EDUCATIONconditional -Use Pernit 8?-22 RICHARTS:S Bear Mr. Coleman: RFAUTY COI.I.EGES Richard's Beauty Collegr,,will be open Tmesday° throuvh saturday f,:ov. ' 8:00am - 4:30pta. Approximately 25 - 3r ^Uonts a dmy will be taken from 9.310am - 1:00psa for servicea. The }•AIRM STF.RS maximum tame that these clients will rcuftin in UNIVERSITY the College will he tvo (21 hours with mast OF BEAUTY remaining only one (i) hour of less. Students will perform all beauty se*;;ices either on cliezits or each other to meet their (the o.— students*) educational ZequireMents accord ng to I&Ivt California,, estate Board regulations. There will. MANAOMMENT be three 11) employees employed at this SYSTEMS location to spervise and asalst these students. The stations will be locatod where the Vknusz are d- wn on the.fkvar t'IAn. The northeast corner of the plan is not part of the SCA001 rnd will not b,al;ong to us. The r-iason for requesting a Conditional Use Dermi,i, is that we Felt the location would provide goad business opportunities. If you have any, other questions please do not hesitate to contact mt. Sincerely, Mark C. Grose Vice President/Controller . �tI C>fr;.�T Ci ro QJUAi.i•t'1' i Elr`.t T`rr;3,v M»' COrl cMite Clfte :2100 N.Euctir.!Ave..UrtterlO.C4 e.17632 tz c 41 gaa•zSa ..,>.., , :�`J ;�7?t`E �•� 119l3- �l',fi 48it•�bjt+9 � y ,...n -.h.xrr,�•nwk.,� '� .rt•- .rr.+•, .r. # ��.r� Richard x� g . ►4AnON ., _�!,�Ct:REI]17`ED SCHC3`t3IS A0 iWQF W06Kt,WHXW -AfE"i �`< July 280 1989 VVI FOR CAREER EDUCATION t. Mr. Jerry Guarrancino * tl City of Rancho CucaZonga " 0. BoX:.807 1%ICHARaS + Rancho Cucamonga; CA 91t30 E31:`AUiY I COLLEGES RE: Rictara's 3eautV; College cup, 89-22. APN 10777-401-29 NA1R4iAS'l ERR LNJVL-RSJTY O.F Sr.DUTY Dear Mr. GuarranciTxo; R A 14 May this $atter serve as an amendment to our MANAGEMENT original r*4.10st-for twenty five (25) statior►s SYSTEMS to be lowered to twerty one (21) stations. It you have any questions, please feel free. to call we at 714/988-7584. I Sirtcer .�. r r 1 Mark C. Grow Vices President/controller McGlIn �:. Corporate Off,�es:200 Jntario.(;,k 9 17($2 c7 1 41 988-7SS 4 r'JOMNDi; NER �Y t sntsaic+lcrlo� :- FRANK J.MI A ISTRETTA',JA810 July 27, 1995 Ju�. ; ,perry Guarracino Assistant Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUMIONGA 9320 Baselsne poad , Post Offioe Boas '807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Pt1730 Re: Richard's Beauty College Conditional Use 'Pem-it 89-22 Dear_?tr.. Guarracino: l This letter will confirm our conversation of this afternoon ! in which Y indicated that we 'z,ould represent that it is the, intention of Brunssvaick Corporation to modify the existing health r,luh location for retail usaas. Also, that it is the intention to abandon any efforts't- re-let the-;premises as a health c b or any exercise related facility,_ Very t ly ours, a$t & B GLICY U , By: J, JIm.11 ;I t� ce cc: T' lia Fra eis �` 9333 RESOLI)TION NO. Ask A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO Ci; AMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 09-22 FOR RICHARD'S BEAUrf COLLEGE LOCATED'AT DEER CREEK vILLAGE CENTER IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1017-401- 9 A. Recitals. (1) Mark C. Gross .of Richard's 'beauty College has filed an application ;for the issuance of, the Conditional Use Permit No. '89-22 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is(-referred to as "the application" .; (III On the 9th of August, 1985, the Panning Commission of the .-ty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on, that date,: (III) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of th'Zz Resolution have occurred, B. Res%;7 tti'on. NOW, THEREFORE, it is Thereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows* 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that 411 of the facts set forth in the Recitals„ Part A,, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upca substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing an duly 26, 1989 including wE-itten and oral staff reports, together with public-testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at. Deer Creek Village Center Unit #i21, within a developed center, including Haven Hills Bo+ ling, restaurants, banking, and other retail usesy ant (b) The applicant proposes to operate a beauty college for up to 50 students, open to the public, Tuesday through Saturday from 8:00 A.M. to 4r30 P.M• and (c) The application contemplates tenant improvement which will include space for a classroom, ;student's lounge, facial .room, office, 21 beautician stations and :reception area; and i J i J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: CUP 89-22 - RICHARD'S BEAUTY COLLEGE August 9, 1989 , Page 2 (d, The use will operate,as a beauty parlor-and will require parking at a rate of 9 spaces per station, thereby requiring 63 spaces; and (e) A parking study shows approxi mate li spaces available for this use; , 3. Based upon the substantial evidc:v a presented,,to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and -upon :the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs f and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in, accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the 0-yelopment Code, and the purposes of the district -in which the site is located. (b) That the `i �oposal will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That tha proposed use does -comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds aW. certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance wti.`th. the California Environmental nuaiity Act of 1970 and, further, this Commissinn hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions setforth in paragraphs 1, C, 3, and 4 above, th-As Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every, condition soy. forth below.'. Planning Division; 1) Any modification, expansion, or ,ether change in operation will require a revision to the Conditional Use Permit. 2) The app,rcant shall submit plans to the Building & Safety Division for permits for tenant improvements prior to construction, T,ae applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, - , Uniform Plumbing Code,.,National Electric Code, and all other applica*le,codes, ordinances and regulations�-in effec.. at the time of issuance ^ of building permits. , PLANNING COMMTSSION RES6VUTWN NO. RE: CUP 89-22 - RICHARD'S BEAUTY COLLEGE - AV'`-51; 9, 1989 Page 3 \. 3) Any signage proposed for the facility sh,vil be designed. in;-conformance with the,Compr?nensive. Sign Drd ii ance and any uniform S.gri a„agram for the �2nter and shall require review and . approval.. by the.Planning Division.,prior to It installation. '+ 4) This Conditional Use :Permit is approved for a >,naximgln of 21 beauty stations and W students. 5) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects` upon-, the adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible termination of,the use. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THI,5,,91`H DAY OF AUGUST, 1989, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CIT! OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: M1 arr,, T. McNiel Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Ranci`o Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission"Field on the 9th' day of Augu:t-1989, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:. COMMISSIONERS: t, !t j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Mgust 9, 1989 TO: Cha;4xman and Members`of the Planning Commission'_ FROM. Brad:luller, City Planner BY: Anna-Lira Hernandez, Planning Aide SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERYT 89-20 - DEEDEE'1°.:DANCE STUQMOv_ The request to Establish a dance studio in 'a°leased space"cif 4,080 square feet within an existing business park on 8.72 acres of land in the Industrial Specific Plaq,, (Subarea 2). located at 9047 Arrow Route, Suite 100 & 110 - APN: 209-012-19. I. PROJECT AND SLTE 'DESCRIPTION: A. Action_Requested: Approval of a non-construction Conditional Use Permit for a Dance: School and issuance of a; Negative Declaration. S. Surroundinc Land Use and 7onfnai North - `E isting apar mekit and park; tow Residential (9-4 dwelling units pzr acre) and Medium Residential (8- 14 dwelling units par acre). South Warehouse; General Industrial (Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 2). East - Manufacturing; General Industrial ',xndustrial Specific Plan (Subarea 2). ! West - Manufacturing/Office; General Industrial (Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 2) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - Medium Residential and parks', South, General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General' Industrial D Site Characteristics: The project site is developed within an existing multi-tenant Industrial Center. JF` f �, ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89-20 GEEDEE'S D;ACE STUDIO August 9, 1989 Page Z E. Parking Calculallions Also, see, attached Exhibit "A". Number of Number of Type Square Parking Space = Spaces of Use Footage , Ratio Reguit`ed Provided Studio 3.192 1/15G 22 Office 8888 1/250 4 4,080 26 60 F. Applicable Regulations: The Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea °'lows dance studios (recreational facilities) subject to the atitiproval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to ldtzte a 4,080 square foot dance instruction studio within the Arrow Gnsiness Park,' at 9047 Arrow Route. The studio proposes t(d offer classes six days a week, Monday through Saturday. O�,Ifice hours will be maintained in the mornings, While dance classes will be concentrated in the afternoons, between 3:3D and 7:00 p.m., with the exception of Saturdays during which classes will be conducted from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Two to three classes are held on any given day. The dance school will have two instructors and approximately ten students per sessioir.. Parents are permitted to view their children at all times. Issues The pri,rary issues related to lozating this type of use within an industrial setting are compatibility with surrounding uses, parking availability and noise. Thefollowing sections address and discuss these issues. 1. Compatibility of Uses: There are a variety of''husinesses within the center. Business support services, :such as Reprographics, Word of Life Church, a del irreslaurant, medical officfls, reearch/development facilities,-a:Karate school and light industrial activities are types of bzes already existing within the multi-tenant industrial site-' ` (see Exhibit "A" and "819. ! In looking at the nix of uses within the site, staff found j a use very similar to the one being proposed _ Traditional American Karate. The clientele for the karate school is Seared toward adyl ., while the dance studio services are geared more towards`ohildrk`n. Therefore, staff believes that the studio will 'ipt t�reate adverse impacts to,the surrounding uses. t, f �t PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89 20 - DEEDEE'S DANCE STUDIO August 9, 1989 Page S Finally, it is important to note that similar requests have been approved and no compatibility brs)blems have been experienced. 'Therefore, compatibility problems associated with this proposal are not capected. 2. AvaiIability of Parking'; This' issues concerns the" availability of parking and the additional circulation strain the proposed dance school would generate within the site. The Develop4ment Code reg41res a total of 26 parking spaces for a dance, floor area of 3,192 square feet (I space per 150 squar6 feet) and an office of 888 square feet (1 space per 250 square feet). Thiere are cuti;rently 3/9 parking spaces located on the site. The proposed lease space is located within a multi-tenant building which was required to provide 1 parking space per 400 square feet. ` A total of 10.2 spaces were designated for this Teased--space; ihe,•efore, there may be some potential parking conflicts between 3;30 and 5:00 PM, when the dance studio proposes to start and tatter businesses are still operating. It is important to not�',ythat approximately 85$ of the students are dropped otf and picked up by parents. In addition, tudentS also utilize car_pool transportation. Therefore, not all 26 parking spaces will be utVlited. Approximately 60 spaces were accessible to the proposed dance schcol within a 100400t radius. Parking data published by the Urban Land Institute, indicates that parking demand within this type of a multi- tenant industrial complex peaks in the morning and begins to drop off significantly after lunch. Therefore, circulation within "the site would be very minimally affected by such a use, Also, Work of Life Church, located in Suites ' 180 and 198 at 9047 Arrow Route, maintains office hours Monday through Friday, and ,eserves Wednesday evenings and Sundays for' congregational activities. The`�fore, parking circulation and demand should significantly be reduced at this peak hour tme period. Overall, the parking capacity should be sufficient for the dance studio and all other businesses` at all times. \ 3. Technical Issues: The applicant is proposing to use a home stereo system with two speakers. The building L t. construction should provide adequate sound attenuation. _ No significant noise conflicts are anticipated by staff. r Included with the Resolution of Approval are conditions relating to noise attenuation (conditions 2 and 5). C-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUR 89.20 - DEEDESIS DANCE STUDIO August 9, 1.98 Page 4 The Fire District indicates that ch eck heck prior to p occupancy will be required (see Condition ,43) The proposed occupancy mu*' be classified as public assembly which would require compliance with all State Fire Marshal requirements (see Exhfbl ,1,011). C. Environmental Asgissment: Upoit-review of Part 1 of the Initial Study and completion of Pert .2 of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant1mpact9 related to a dance school locating within this fidustrial center. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all the following findings in order to approve this application 1. The proposed use is in Accordance with the General. Plan, and the obJective�.--.:rf the 0evelopment Code, and the proposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located. 2. The proposed use will not ba detrimental to the public health, Safety or welmare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vitinityr, 3. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industr:,al Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper and properly, post2d=, and notices sent to adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Condi'tfonal Use Permit 89-9-0 through .adoption of the attached Resolutio!t-of Approval. Respectfully submitted, Brad duller City Planner BB:,ALH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site Utilization Exhibit "B" = Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Exhibit "D" - Fire District Comments Exhibit "E" - Letter From Applicant Resolution of Approval C, { i Business Use suite Ff... Parking Rotfe Parking Be utre 9007 smvw Route •• Marc softy Cofnuucdan BUMIA3 CantraVoll 01000 100 a120 142D 1/250 1s Rammafda Con eft : o is goo - 10 1/250 9 Nacho Bor2AaMt Wks - is 1102 „.11 50 - 5 9047 Arr"Rauh Does Pence Studio Health sign: 100 a 110 -�[oi 1 250 at/tSo. 0 '�F�nIXI a.ofvanomB Burtnwe ... . t 140 160 416Q 7564 11400 19 Floodno Rdn^Contl fhas V 155 6 170 3gag \... 1129 .. 13. Word of Ufa Church -180 a105. '3080 11 50al l3S 81 Je 'e Doll E!ft and ntink1 b-A VAhmad1 100 ._- 1020. 11100 10 AW7,4row Routs .. ,•. INand Modell t40alcal 20t=1a 205 2088 11200 1. Ilm sums Otfids 210 9 1.1250 A United As FieeearOVDevet fnent 1A0 220,-=0 ZF.22 11330 1/. Curanex RasawchlDevelcornsrif 190,170,'180 120:. 55494 1:.. 280. - a 50 11350. Sail Aflow&yfa Em Irn Se_ rviey ae alr servleas 100 '12650 11400 62, n?Arrow Rout ' ocul Rossarch/Oevelo mans 100 8 120 4050 11350 12 S.T.V. �- 8141",Service - 140 1800 1M00' 5 christens' C fls BuAnxa Su servleo 150 - isoo1 400 5 0~Joyce ' uies 150 11100 11280 i. wnyln Fresh Service 170.. 1500 1/400 5 90a:Roure .. .• Recovery T. Mwlcal - 140 1920 1.1200 10 .' Trwiaanat Atnsrlren Kerate Haab^$mM0 150 A Mi 3840 1N50 2i San Antonio Hos iW Mwlr'. 171 a 180 -: 4320 1/200:. 22. 90V Ammo Raul FlasTrlfn Mwlu! 1o0 - 17415 11200. 44 San Antonio Hoedw6 t4wlew 1120 1 lasoo 1/200 59 i NORTF f I OF I°T'Em:- 8- RANCHO U A TITLE i FLtMING-, GIVISION, C-57- EXHIBIT: 6 SCALE--. .. ,- Arrow Route RICO u• t f I � t., •� l �C. 1 � r 61'• �;,a;r not. 1mv Ir tr' /2fa' 0210 r 123a 4130 t C 2Cty 112p 1 Ilia PH = to Q50 4 TP21C .} SLOC.2•0147 Arrow Rots �' .redZ I Ilia m �i�H,wgg C. OffICt:SPACt rPTo I �i} .8 �.. •!1 a' ' Ilia' oMCS�PAI:t! — f do»' r Lso OG.7 9007 Arrow Routs ltea' =nlo' =Q.2 Coll i Arro,r-Roue i"t olW o Yt14 1 `i�Jt r't S/10 tlttn .� r To to :.Itla 1 ar.oc.s C BLOC.6 l t BLOG.1 la077 Arrow Routm - ➢GS~T ty, a.03.7 2017 Avow Routs PC77 Arrow Ro-to . ."Arrow ; Route PROPOSED PROJECT NORTH' PL -P :NI—ING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALE: }-- Q ;_ 1 440 �2AmCi. Lbyn-iJALL 3j= GYP 0 uw 3i2,� tVltT�2 • .,.• �" t VIEWIQC3 l3 f 4 �t 1 26°X, `" ' '� 4,4 I GW ti NORTI (JClT- Y OF ITEM: J�LAiNWINJ- DIVISION C - EXHIBIT: SCALE:�._.. Food Fire aFlECTION DISTRICT t'.Q.BOX 33-6623 AMETHYST St.♦RANCHO C'JCAMONCA 41701 (714 987•2533 I 1 1 CONDII'IONtiL USK PERMIT REQUEST COMMENTS DEE DE'S DA:(CE STUDIO CUP#: 89.20 9 ,AAROw,Juan 100 do 110 DATE 7-27-89 The lire department has some concerns sareling the proposed occupancy noted above. It is conceivable, based on square footage., that this oecupanry woOd be classified a public assembly. If this is the cc^e, State Eire would apply. Marshal requirements I Prior to approval of the CU(>, we would need to have a< st d drawing showing the following Information: I. Exact -Se of eacb room. 't 2. All ".0 hom At buildlRg end from each room In addition, certification that all floor P. rerings, writ cgvetings, hangings, decorations, etc. meet State Fire Matshti flame M&WILIt rerruiret.tents must be submitted. An application for permit to Opetate a public assembly (fee would be based on occupant appr load)ovaland.a plan check (cc in the amount o$S120.1 o v-- a olsr be requited prior to plan If the Occupant laid is detttmined to be more than 299 persons. a fire alarm system would be regviatd. Other n:quirements would be determined after plans have teen submitted, Vera A, .Srthur, Pian Reviewer 4 NOR.TI 4 Ci Y Vr ITEN: e-- cat P o f - z 0_ #I RANCHO CUCAMONGA7t�fi��► F�d-r�-+�t,.� ��;��. !MINGA i1 INVISTMEW COMPANY June 5,ises Cyrz pia tenser Planning Departmsnt, Clty of Rancho Cucamonga 93201,C Baseline Road Rancho Cucan1w-; ,Catlfornia 31730 RE, Arrow euslness.Park `gar Cynthia: Attached,,please Sad a Conditional.Use Permit application for a tenant who would like to locate with°ri the Arrow Business Park. We wish to allow Danaart Friedman owner C'No Des`s Dance Studio, to locate her business w'ihtn Building u2 of our prolact. Under the conditlonaily permitted uses for sub area a,this would fall under the category of recreation r.I'sttas. Den Dan's Dance Studio would like tc lsase approximately 4,000 aquara feetwithi.-j c oro;ec As you can see from t'a attached tenant im;;ovemant plan t 1e s, ?cs would ne CirgG�Into three iar;a classroom areas, T:19 hOU7S Ot Cpefa.;on ''o. Des Doe's Dance studio are as fct:ows: Mon thru Fn 10 0 A.M.to 7:0. P.M. Sat 9:00 A,M. to S:oo P.M. Sue Cloaad ;t is important trp-Ote that the daytime students at Use Dee's tend to bo young at age and therefor do not ur'lize their awn vehicles i„ order to attend*,lasses. pprOXfMd y 851_ of the students arz dropped off and kicked up by parents and/or carpod;s. Des Dee does not rlaed any adoiL:^-al parking over th!, 122 spots allocated':c her in her lease agre enent to opc her business. Des DO-has chosen to locate in our reject for a numb r location offers her close proxtm�top he residenfiN base df t®sC�o Rancho Cucamohga, 5eco1101y, tf > access afforded by Vineyard sne,Arrow Route are also recessary to her business. Additionally, Deb Dee feasts that the locatirtl across from Bear Gulch park in conjunction with the affordability of the space anti'the quality of the davalopl,rant are also reasans for loeafing at'he Arrow Business Park. MM I ada � RANCHO CUCAlUONGA, TITLE:rill'tCA-: PLANNr'G DIVISION ��� EXH1137.- SCALE: l �I RESOU'JTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RA%JHO CUCX40NGA PLANNING COMMU SION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USC PERMIT NO. 89-20 FOR A DANCE SCHOOL IN A LEASED SPACE OF 4,080 'SQUARE FEET WITHIN AN EXISTING MULTI-TENANT PARK LOCATED ON'-8.72 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GWRAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2), LOCATED AT 9047 ARROW ROUTE, SUITES 100 APD 110, AND MAKING FI►dDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209.012-19. A. Recitals. (� Messenger's Investme:-t '(DeeDee°s Darce Studio) has filed an application for the issuance of the Canditional Use Permit No. 89-20 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this ,Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "tie application". (ii) On the 4th of August, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cgcamoaga. co.iducted a duly oaticed public hearin; on the application and concluded saiA hearing an that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution e have occurred. AOL B. Resolution, NOW, Ti,EREF ORE, it is hereby found, deters'} and resolved by thL- Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, :haws; 1. -11 {s Commission hereby specificall, tu, that all of the facts f set forth in tJtr hecita's, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. E 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this- Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 9 1989, including writte and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds a3 follows: (a) The applicatlt ; applies to pr;ipes^ty located. at 9047 Arrow Route with a street frontage of f.'r%63 feet and lot depth of 622 feet and is presently improved with 7 buildings and parking spaces;, and W The property to the north of the sub3ect site is art apartment buildings and pyv-k, the property to the south of that site consists of industrial building. the property to the east is industrial, and the property to thy: west is industria-;, and (c) The subjuct property`consists of A wide variety of uses, includin; nu,€nests s4, pkrt services, medical offices, research & development, light i►-ustrial, chur.�";md kt.,ite school; and C —to PLANNING COMMISSION RES0LUc110N"NO. CUP 89-20 OEEOEE'S DANQE STUDIO August'9,, '1989 Page 2 (0) There are 60 parking,spaces''available for- the proposed use;, in comparison to the required 26 parking spaces. (e) The application cootemWlates 2 to 8 classes of 10 studf;nts each, six days a week. -)Hours are, proposed to he from 3,30 P.M. to 7 00 Monday through Friday, !atv3 from 9,CJ A.M. to ';00 P.M. an Satuays ' The ?majority of tenants within"the complex have basiness hmI s between P,.bO A.M. and 5,o0 P.111., Mama,, through"friday. , 3. Based upon tht:'substantial evidence presented 7o this Commission during the above-referenced, public bearing and troon the"specific findings of facts set forth in paraqsr.dphs 1 and 2 above,: this Cctdnission hereby finds and conclud-i as follows; (a) ., That tf.,4 proposed use is in accord w-th the &ef Aral Plan, the objectives of th �avelopment Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is loc�'ert. (b) Tb# the proposed use, t.g3ther With the conditions app'riL,.,'e thereto,`- ill not be detrimental•to the publto health, safety., or. we,fare, or materiil�'� injurious `to properties . or imEprovenetsts in the vicinity. >,. provisions of the h<hat ev�lathe at Code., use complies with each off the. applieab e pme 'r 4. Ws Cb mis:sinn hereby finds and certi€'yes that the project has been r,viewed and cohs.idered in compliance with the California. EnvirGnmentaI Qua`its Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Decleration. Based upon the findings:4i4�nclosions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hercly arproveti the application subject to each and every- condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Condit;ons, attached hereto and incorporated herein by 94iis reference. Plannina Division 1) Approval 'Of thie� ,equest shali not waive Arepliance with ali sections of the- Industrial Area Specift Plan, anal all other City Ordinances. 2, if the operation of the ;acuity causes advarse effects: upon adjacent businesses or operations,' including, but not limited to noise, the Conditional Use Permit. Shall be brought iref'ore i the planning<,Cowissian. fur ttie consideration: and possible termination of,the use, ,; PLANNING COMMISSION'RESOLUTIONINO. CUP 89-20 OEEDEE'S.rANCE STLWO August 9,:1989 Page 3 3) Occupancy, of the facility s,`;all not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Firg- (iarshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to 3ccupancy, plans shall be. submitted to the Foothill Fire Protect-an District and the Building and Safety Division to shoe` compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.':. 4) Any sign proposed for the facility shall be designed in cortfarmance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance, any Uniform Sign 'Progr;a fo+r the complex, and shall require review and approval by the Planning ,Division prior to installation. B). The feiility shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards for. ,Subarea 3, including, but not limited to, noise levels. 6) Operating, hours for classes shall be limited to '. Saturday and Sundays, and :after 3:33 p.m. ,. Morday through Friday, except on national holidays. 7) ibis Cunditiorral Use Permit is approved for a maximum of one instlructor and 1a students per class.; 'however, this shall not preclude larger gatherings for special events, such as awards ceremniei and tournaments after 6 00 p.m. on weekn°;ghks or on weekends. ` 6 The Secret._ 'y to tnis Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. L` APPROVED; AN0 ADOPTED THIS 9Tw GRAY OF AUGUST, 198s. PLANNING'COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: tarry .. tncM_ieT;_ Pman ATTEST. Brad Bu ser, ecretary i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NOA CUP e9-20 DEEOEE`S DANCE STUD IQ` August, 9, 1989 Page 4 - T, Brad I!uller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Renrho Cucamonga,, do hereby cerTtlfy '-that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly `introduced,v,passed. and adopted by tap Planning Comn:ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the {Manning Commission held on the ath day o'P August, 1989, by the follotiirig cote-to-wit, € AYES: C"ISSIONERS: ' . NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1t i ;I 1 J I Qp oi.�$c�'ua�Y,vi.' w"�.�i ,o a�.ge• u �aa a+-S.ri.'ci Q` •ysaa.�u�o�.�.»r��. .0 buy,° �� q�.G�� acL" oc'Xy oa 'V C��a.id aaL+�Qx�C.� 9FYG0 L.,O N CC'C�O CY 4.N L�9 �,.G.Ye hgC�M�I�V LOti� 'yY '0 OaGY Yam. ®m M C^Cwq O. • q r N ii■V ryry .0 C 9 .9 sill. aOi>�G� Oitt G AO G V �{wa s R4ti 9.0 Y^ b L 6G p. V V Y N �b vpC •. Yyppm LY`� CrLKNa. RY �Oy • �Y OV 4 � J _-7 No � Y,.V 9EV '� a•q. &Z-3 Ct 4C b� Y yp~..�7.4'•^ �4 �t »gm- �+ Lisa-tli y m•r 4'9 Ca ipn _ 4Y $ TQ R Off' LY pYgY V, OC Yij �m000VG GiC�C YV't •. . u$g$ L:.S o.=u .G. ca ic'C c VC N.iai wd 1K a'a$o i de$Nui$a UM 6a VA6C17N.L��.�. O FO�.p N. oS.Y� T.MAP arf� `Q�tY' ..1+•Z nL�Gi •� Wy �� 9fj��V •i�` � G V M U�IYO V O.�e C • pJ Id W V Q H O1.M� V m 64w�K ]C C:CLO s G3 Y 1-61 63 ie We IN �Mf N �= O •C -B F`A 6m�n�N6Y� at � ., C-r �Y�w O�6^ ■Y 61 Y(i/Y 4^K�9`��s. xi 6 U Gy �OS'r 4 O. ��Ri. �4t}� ■.y4j�� ACLL�� N�g�g11 O�LaCppL aA 4 Q G V.^►qp O y Q g D YY,l 4 4 L G ar3 Cl*C. i M Y ,�Y 4 N Gtl 'Y C.y Ny.a. Cgg4 NM 4Y NO G'yt it•y, �N w. i. Lwpp Ot O•'�C. y Y�4 gg Q HE UrrU G AV N $'v^' a� U..Z YZIYC LA C��. �..QQQ■■'. pN}..Y � p 3 ,YN4y slR�gpQ� C p i` Q gQY.O '.7yDu Y w c8'rf~{ y^ ..� C} V qT,4.^ ..C.w up 4V•�OF�Ny� aaV^aYw.Z xV,t-: � 4 ,.,:roMn eyry�Np e-��4i,.�`V0.:^ _L��$TYrN n'+�. ; rn�T. �'� •� 9 N.19a �r^•,CY� 6�QJSOA yw � LFUTLY q 5.. ^02 /V. q it hw.Y V un F L cY� ^u 0 Nn.CJNiC O~N NN �.4. �w 4N4 0 "t• ayY Ny Y r o C{W� R 's t u mG �NryygC M +O�i N WOw N-M. 4}1�� SNaQt .t. O.C�� V� q. �@@}• ��1�.YNI.YJ!¢ O1p�y .GA q¢� Ctl On V'C 1 ' VaW N C �.. FC 'w r�ijiL L�1.+�p�y1{O N.` reW t9YYi O. yb�^ba fir N,0FIVSZ: �aass. `^��CyCy +Tii.4.,NGQ' .�.aA��uy R. 91 yj�l�tpa y��.. �L�•r. ��y /'�y?fQi. GR. •�y � 4y tjwY 9 ■St YOI M6.V. rµ�6+N Nt..:w j!}�u�Y pb C'�( a�=^G L-G M• G C~ 6Ggqipp�^ pptA'►tryC+wr:o�YJ ,y�,p�� aUy�tpp. s�A ��O/Ap�aJ ptyU'Y+L. ww}(.04 yLV�Yp" "GBM4 OYf.NVY Yl y�qy 7' AI tJ; iA .q✓Gi 3.Tifit,. gQ4 R aZ a� N , Y N � ss .Y YOU.t~~.1C A4 a4 w (s$ �Y#O NY ~yyTirr\� D/Yy✓p ' 14 El f e . C'*D u 4^ aK ill to CY` Y n Sr }yn mlis � sQ Gal 4wL C %I N3 V����N e�. 't�f®j( �3gjY� l NY~4y. .4q6 Ntit. QR N ;wq Yii�•• �bL t�i4yN V�Cri C'a�e LLLb yy pp sy? p ^ � t �FL✓ �T^"- +~.Sp. "�O yi' Y4 ~�w Y�64�r' � � `�'w/Q�'EA rs •tj o �Gr V�ii y�i��+. ppp�` 4ai+�®+ {�1,C Qa89n ® n.6 A3 ytlr7 431 A fIl33�ly�.�{Viw.f� 'UM wa EAtgO tpt � `�`�lb Yy^O yY z p yts � i O =rv"qy.4 9ati��+++,sCCOY��q1YF-9.y,0u,.= SYZiNii+ g xy �. �'• MM7« Vv � +et� w�w>ii.Y' yyNu $g.O tp piY4^V i �.r GMy � LV Q O nL w p�ep•N y�l• {4 i O' `Q 3�1Ati O�.y �,Q+ y w~ ^f.u^1 y ^u VyS..t¢9.[A�fTa� ^ vyu+Ca,VYAa.`°�' ugo�p.Qtl '<'G` i4 r�N.O YY.aW4 $i..Ntl 454� .4 t1 JDMV[1.FtO�.�� jmN„yM�4 F.�rAj Y�-q,4 _ b r � o pp QQNQ CO- d OC ti1Y O-o CpY��4L~ap+ ~LO. 4'N y "yi 9 yy t•Gtq pQ^� _ p10 ma VC._L GC VG p ..A� s Y1 � G. wa '1f vYv'tVRpm tW. `MCO Vop Hqy HLrtl�`' wv~� $t'"n n 4 •Y•p mp —� ZyW�N.p. � pF-i til u�1 �'.. 'ry � N Zq .Ga� ay�o�N Na 3.'%w w 4 0j°i+ NC3GL u� sC '� �"�^Naeu � ".2L� vzub: S�,N3, 0^ 1 AAC -p•.L �NyUY L<V py cRLY CG, GN N �. pV. dp pC. CC yCiW Na p�LyYvf .�•.T C�p.5tNN�YYN� �pG�G+�.G y�M NO OV O. WHC Mi LGG L" Y. 1/p1�y�LLy•^ry ypyYy�M 21L &H rr' Lp O.7 CLw C Nw.N btl Gti Ae+" G6 a ffI OIV Y M �l V.�C�.. N d Y QI N M Y}I ^w.%E B 4y¢f, QO.IIJ�o�1I iy1�N5 •air r�9iL� vq�■D �'L CI� L. YYM Y 0vl „N .N.V4 pwpp�/ = G$X7.RL NL Gs S:tN �MC NO t"�L4y O. gLWO CNCC O �yINyI 0� WY. C 6Y Lai •"Nt {. wroC N �, R Y`^Y D r O� y p•r M1 w'a� �ro Y Y Fy�.^� L a p.�� YOLpVi L f.. �NY.� N�� S•Y�. {� bP �6f.. ^V L Vy1i N I yGN�. O 41 P� i 4 O1 1.yi L,ny L q ' YV4 L 6 C .UCLLO�Of.aG.0 aYl�u'°m` Gas• _G" 4$ '� L CM G4. ■N' ,6Ni YY �qp{4� f%1+•N N N C N^. .G N >i K p T.N L ^K N VCV A.2 LC1 i•a O.N.L �i�•IG.Y W �C OU LLLIi.O IGF.p N •� I 1 LaV LYC. YC C ± �C SIC TCw >py�!.01N2 C N !p•I RLO1y '.` ,GN y�r{pO.. ay yw 1.O:w U�}��iTiS a!! I~n O�l6q Y yN pit M 4�N', O6 G�IDS 6 Lp w�yI LV� YZ~� i• �� rvl L'" ,^ `N� C4y^ Q+tJ� B^_ ► Vy CI L�y�T A N�.w� -C M�Aa A9w Cyp '� dN wLL4 ps �SVi p_�y `4piC.p. >..� C6pi ,• Vw OV � 4d. LYO. LP OCCV@ YVt y.6 tQ■y. O y�Tp� �w. w �t } ,p}y{ A V V tl N M -34 Cw.L' 7 w R > L N Y O L 66C NR Si+ B N R' IS yv7 G y ¢ Nv�^iL1 ^ q A N tNNy pN N. Y Y 9. �,« e4; U I 4O yil►� G Qf� ^ QL ~fig V q 4�L Zz Q V Y VW 4^� $~� '0p�V wfVa V 7M C OO N�Ir b U G tI yw ,:> u yT��u a�.l !"93 V.®YYp y Y� UOGY.� V >m `rt aa`� .ta c�"�'a Vgp'I��a a> at a , Le Z.2.at Y 2.%-a eM nl N O~ Yr•+.� q^L. 1L�I"• 8II �C■.p■, �S'y P.~ Mpn K IM 9C yyyWY yQ Y5 AON �wy,N4.lf tl1 q M p w x p �1.0�y y y(q NMW L C G�4`1 is.d •Nil ^10 m L 9 ^N Ll �pppC w p U. I\]V V •N C2/.!�'i' p C iGB p4• EI�'wCw {u, O 4 Uy NV Ln N�@`; CA C�yq'U y{, V e•1.q V VO i C�,y d«L �L. N C.`.�_ � ^�1_N+�T t y RNW^ i 3ywO� L C Y S �y 4� 6�P Y 9 gb Y2O C i r L 5 L,e."• b' YI E o Y•.. u...!' " a." +`+.~...N,'..CL 1:T iYNa '9 11• � 4b�NY NN ~'�U N iIV.L� asni Sazt M G Qlo � � v yam. 't^�c•:- ui ^N �. ��� CYd ^p 1LV Y y4o w �2.Cdy �COd YG C • �C. i.i LO 61L cwcS Wry Zw yyyCUJOt .212 q r y 1<I V• C GY MS 440 p� vNy.V C M�.ati y"J� OIYt CNLY�},V Mw OC 11• M. �N�SC� qNY�.. 7 L•w yV�1 iY'uCi ��^Y 9.yL�Y .0�w■ (z-. y°•,yY q���a ov a�N CL ga� ODQIO P�qf�7 AQL�uy.�C Z'. �.�•.' 204d Y�g9m ^■w. N+q� G V01 C�w■p� '•OI.`O � W�N4• y NBC G6C Yd�. � G.q O N Y q A C g O U S Utz P.Y Y Q"tl C ^ q L� u C�y p ^Vw sitGGG� � L ^J dCCt VY �L�«� 6 LN o tl 0�a Zvi N�yCiY�. 8,3 qY7 i�N�.�y■C Y.O yd C ^ r301 Y<L ITjV qV Yw 9 { Yy q� 4r Q ti '� 7e y 0 7 Y Y q .a�u`E N Y.,� Lcyo••� q OI C QQ,, a �,. N L•d Y i(u�{ O. N q M L�• NaLLLC �Y.L �4CgO ,_}N!�L V MC.'gT O(Cyy��� N.d �G. N ^C.•. y.�l� e �L{■�W L,. YC q{YY■�N L~A G Y. O ^N�•�►Y �'.�C��/ � � R..N�. •L• 3N{314VI 15, 3Y Y m O _GN N 6 u ft �.`7O4 A �:,.a I IswR� �tl1��0 �O�A�O � N • >• i cz HI f 4-822 CO 3 6 Y 4CM 5{ld LL. YO Jd6 4Af�R LC V L C N tC ' 001�. pMQ u®C I. 6 wM 6A C Vu NL. p C L L Y Y gii?$N. m S.y4� ,i� Wy\,yy�..•app��• W.,Y q�& �. C i• �NAY^ ^4-� L 'q y�yNL y i',✓ L aC�N �H{� yO9 N OG YOr" _u O' _ t �.C t N Q yp i y:r 5 O'O.� w ao gs�Ya cs �SY. Lam c� w°.WW ll �+ac .1d+g C N^ Jy j7 y�Yl � R MMd O C.� L a Y!, T LN yY M> N w w Y^Y T+ M M L q•+•C. y:; Y Nz^a ~~ N06: NN 6qv 1VLG G�S�• NN ^ NL O.Y O A ttoLHLVCC OY_ !'�'0..� YC ,�d.V wY`r N^ti�AO y � 00 CNO. M.LYC LA M 6M}tl1 ~■S7 Np R. •us�' wq•s ,� \y' CCO^i CP b � y qV L.O.e�z{[�f�� aN• q� {•A! C GB L V ��� Oyyw ♦iffMa C. ysy.b �oC ai�V} ; uNQ sy C` � r VY .I` 9.. `NO 7AaC C �.iCqu 4�_ yy ^ is-ggqV • }� Nw 6� L qN� MS COO Ir C,^yYL' .." 6G0 i0 C yR GEq L�.Y� • G Luq_ lOw5. O 01 p9 yO .;: VMCD L Nh:�•. f Cw$i Y9.N w.{ OLf p 4 CY Y N t Si - Y4 4M rqw II..C.E'LN � Al L:s •0.�,�N < t^Y tl 4 r v L q'.r•q C LL 6L O.C O Y M ® �. C h•NC Y•�i N. N 37w� JL p+. i'. I�q�gw 46� �Y Nm V Y 4 rti ry moo�. eZp^d�.r� i aL- d Q c c oa c w v O C.2« y T C J 7 « N N G O G .a NL� Lr.ry OQL Od O. N L N r. YL�C N :. W Li va�Y'c` _ggo �.�. �a i LOC pdC 1 . y4yA� YO.y Oy� ` d OtM.ld ^«:. 936 Q CC' ~ O u"w N Y. .Twg. �N■Yc 1p' ''i raN "O'` .a. rou�� gay:6 �p d N} O N C.+s ♦..'rY O L. O V' t.Lg,. N y 6K1^nj C m i U�W C y� a o w Q■�O6Mt L N. 7w Iz% /�� Y - 4 Y C w fi L.1 Y. W L. 1.r O A Y Y 6 g G 4 X. V p1`1 wwOq yy dLONwYI� A NA iw. CY Y O M M. �� w V�NOC W qC i+ O�■M6^C 9So.■V 01 C� Np ~ NN ~.� Y� R. y yp4' �yL1,� Cp ia0 y) i CVyy YY p d i CC O.OwW A1F .aN p aN. 0. {aL.YNI W O R) N� �� •I NI �� ^I Q 1 y^w 6{{�� pp CNY L.6 $ COCyr ��u OM�'C1�N. M - .�N d qss aC p ^ CEOC Pa pCC ij apY9�`N_�y Y Y p yL�p�L O Q CU'(W� y^ZIv v"�wf... a L'Sy LC. g1 .S1 _pf, q qy 1r s` Yw.CLYS N� M1 Ili Z(C�d .5w l`�y_� LO o Tat- ar�0� CYQ YT ♦/ Ye' pY q.its. dN Y; aw N� �O w�YM 7wy� MaO ^ u�C �pEp By�y2 Si 7G 11 pV�.N w. yOY p YOY`O�I. L� P. r. 6g ` -qq �` �aYw® Na w &u� C.Oiw a'ro���+ Y yc Y M Y L L Y Y ■ S qC zizq Ly ^pI. p43 Y9V®� CC �^ :a NOIi'4 2w Ye�.0 7■� Grr OC �. C�:Q C+ �i'...■0. CO-S QL�t.:.. CIHO Q.�. C�Y6w1 {.�y t304N0`.tl 011. OEM �CIYA G�s� My C�Cy�Yj J Y C�•r� E1 y�. L a'� `S is gdL e>a �g.3S�,4y C ra``p YYgqpp 6.N OM y 'Ow Oyyyy� Y Nw. Qm Cw cj �m- i.rtLF. KQY it;0 Ct L C L N 1El CiYN Vw� WNp tiUGi 70. V'7'm ! a v R CL C w Yy, lz C L 3 IF1. 1 d'G,. ;; .`n q: V w ` Y V $. Q '� A Ji� •tl.+�' i pd L yy �. ~t G C :11 „1 �^ % a O. 0.'� YT�C �� LLy�p �•r. N� �( Gy G^ GA MOO -I A `.1C4. -2-5 KVie.. N n a O. Y Y N C L '1 M1. NY L y ~ �C4 Aro p y CY_ Q4 E, qL g yyirS�yCa�. O.. Y.u. y�}�� Q p M pax y 4y.. p1.A N LY O 6 Y ram. LA.y qL /© TpC �_ Q.~' L^uUOrry tis cY6�yty 52, V N \V O uq�Yp�C AYE YN� YW Cr. `VUt p4W �� GN. ■C p �,� d �xY�YL �s.A . bW OI Y 1 u N .K „Ca Yw. �� M=. Y He pr ,G Y L� V O �C:S JY. Yl4 04Y %C.y dam. "WY NL:�4! 'J�I"IT O <► C !"v wCi F� tVIW 'S FiM 0 7 N pi FT Y N M O C L M y N Ad.V J y tlp u u e � E- a$ssa 6 u u aw�n au G M � r'C «tx ycol. Gau .a Nr « atl.o. 4 r r qrCpY' .�Ct NO 1:L qv.,Of c a. say: +r N` `�..' L-C ,�.u e —E s s« i.i. C e.�^`... ems. ....�o v�'i.. YE 3_6 CN �.ei+�. w�ML uM k to{ cy Lw y ��~�}� o.z ss a^' 6rf y N R� 1,i �■ M N q,Y lL .1{.py I.C� q��ZL�V q�. VL. NN NVr N y l l� Ct {l Q1(� A iL,1 p 4 B C wv■y■yam Oo i` O' � ~ N�iC gd_fj LBJ,•�0 a~r. Mt+0.Y {yC�{N� p■G� Life d b W Tf7� �+Ls Y Q C Gy A_ L�'i�� yd1 V{fit"p.5 1 [.1 Y L i 4 L C C Q N Y q w% 41 wr I ii IppW-�Y AA '\ I L� AY Vuy � sr V� 14r�.W C'Q 3. Iwixv W Y+ t a6L atQ �.5 r. YY _ pp Q M 4 :4'M JiH IDM w4�a w w V tog t V4si QC 4' • LYQV �Q `. C 4 C 4~a.. CYYrN M i y ttY N sa �� 7:Girlly y`(yq ,fig✓{ib�W b-70 15 IL V a fib R V� 4 q® e u a to Ll� ��y9y1Y. �♦ y��yy�.. y � V� �"� ��Ciy, y�6. 1V.'4 V y 4 11Y 6 4 VY' w Vry M L 4.A MC V W,y t t yL ti y D mQw D.V M MT yG »C'4� we 7■MTV �~- L wA y �aQy C{{4yDJJ t.y.VY i'if s a�O.l CD� LN * Ci. G�t�Q CG Kww L mow{� 4 N �L N� 4 C (y2sf b{Q tJ9�Jt ✓w�.rx f}�r�.I 4v, O A C Q 4�bq� y q. 4 N L 0 �y » iT y C� �4�w� �!Y.L• y Y+• ✓r, N Y V L .4 Mwfi lM'i •.y y N Oft ` Cep. 10! V3.✓„ y ��y}l 1 .,s� '.NN-I b L iq� Vol , Vi b .Q�C MCiGW 4 OQ 7 GY. }.w}. aw 03 +C j3 �»�C V#� Q� r✓]ytt CVC j� y 4p S» �.�.»>•l� <W L1v rR 4NywN 9w 4.fuv a�au. Y»4 V CITY OF RANCHO OUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 9, 1989 ' TO Chairman a-<c Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad 8017r, City `rlanner BY: Steve Hayes, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-10 - AMPAG - The'equest to establish outa .e storage Within a Southern California Edison easement of i3.73 acres in the Heavy Industrial %, �alopment District (Subarea 15j �r t,5 Industrial Specific Plan, located on the south side or" Arrow Route, east of, and adjacent .to, the Devore Freeway AON> 229-121-16. (Continued from July 26. 1989) VARIANCE 8949 - AMPAC A request to allow landscaping as a method of screonins an outdoor storage area Frei a regional trait. Landsc5ping and storage area to be 'located oit a Southern California Edison rzyl t-of-way of 1:03 acres in the �> Heavy Industrial District. (Subarea 15) of the Industrial Adak Specific Plan, on the south side of Arrow Route, east of, and adja%;ent to, the Devore Freeway - APR: 729-I21-3.6. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Actioni Recwested_ Approval of a Conditional Usk\ Permit for outdoor pipe storage, Variance for the use of landatcaping as a method Gf scref�,ning outdoor storage from land useO 3n connon, and issuange of a Nagative Declaration. B. Surroondina: .Land Use and Zoniao* North - Interstate 15 Freewayright-of way and vacant; Utility Corridor. South - Railroad right-of-way and vas;ant, General lgdustrial (Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 14). East ;Pips manufacturing and storage, Heavy Industrial (Industrial Sp—ific plan Subarea -15). West Interstate IF reeway;rioht-a:-vay and flood control channel; HeatI Industrial '(industrial Specific Plan Subarea 15). C. General Plan Desionations: Project Site u Flood Contral/Utility Corridor North - Flood Control/Utility Corridor South Flood Conteot/Uit,l ity Corridor East - Heavy Indusvffa't Test - Flood Control/Utility Corridor ITEMS .0 5 i AN N I N G OMM IS SIeh STAFF REPORTPL.' ^ , VA 89-09 - AMPAC Ru 3t 5, !9&9 Y, Page 2 g., Site Characteristics•: Ti,'t. ;i o is currently developed with Edison power lines and otherwise is void of any sig,0f+cant vegetation,, sloping gently from north to 'oath, A detention por,< at the south en4 of the site collects run-off and pools and evaporates on-site. E. Applicable Regulations: the Industrial specific Plan permits add#tional act#vities. (besides transmission towers, flood ]'] control channats, etc.) within utility corridors subject to the I Provisions in Chapter 17.16 (Open Space Districts) of the Development Code, Table 17.16.030 of the Development Cnde J specifies that storage in areas substanti-�Ily surrounded by 11 industrial uses within the Utility Corridor development l District may be considered for review and .approval by the Planning Commission through the CoWitional Use Permit process. The Industrial Specific Plan ('Section IV.A.o.f.) specifies that outdoor storage areas within the Neavy Industrial Development District shall be screened by masonry or concrete walls or wood, metal or chairs-Iirik fences. Since 'landscaping is not ^pecified as One of the acceptable scrK.,bning materials, the Planning Commissiorr gray consider the -;Ae of landscaping as a screening device for storage areas through the variance process. II. ANYSIS: A. General: Tye applicant; is proposing to utilize a 'Southern California Edison (SCE) utility corridor of 13.73 acres for outdoor storage of cors,rete storm d ain pipe (see Exhibit "B"). No structures or lar 4 mechanical equ:;'"Ien#: are proposed to be constructed or store- .)n this site. Large forklifts or 'imilar 4_uipment will bri.s the f<,tished product to the right- k f-Way from the manufacturing site adjoining to the east. The pipe will be lined up as to not impede the natural runt-off patterns through the site. Stacking of the pipe will be done as per Exhibit "E" and will nct exceed the height of any walls or landscaping that are required to screen the situ from vi -,*, Staff contacted SCE vegarding their requirements and �x ;rictions for the proposed use. SCE tupportfxd the nropos;.d =:a subject to compliance with landsc pe and access needs (see Exl:i bi t "F") b, Issues: The pri%ary issues reT trd to locating art outside storage area at this particular location are cfF�patibiliiy with surrounding uses and the screen*; of the outdoor storage atea from the public, right-of-way and land used U commons Within the immediate area, most of the land is Malt, ext;opt for the applicant's isip manufacturinr3 piairt, which � immediately to the east. NO residences or retail e.0mmercial businesses exist PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: CUP 89-10, VA 89-09 - AMPAr« August 9, 1989 Page 3 neee the proposed storage area. Furthermore, zoning patterns indicate that any new development in the immediate area will be industrial related. Staff anticipates tNt adequate measures have been placed on this project to elimirite any potential compatibility problems. The Industrial Specific Plan (Section IV.A.6 storage area/screening) requires storage areas- to be screened from view from the public right-of-way and from land' used in common. Furthermore, outdoor storage within 500 feet of the Devore Freeway right-of-way shall be screened from public view. Acceptable materials for screening along the freeway include block or masonry walls, berming, dense landscaping, building mass, or a combination thereof. In past correspondence with Cal Trans, the most acceptable form of screening was dense landscaping. At this particular location, the freeway is elevated approximately 40 feet above the natural ground. Due to this, staff requested that the applicant prepare sight line studies to show how landscaping could' screen the outdoor storage area from the freeway (see Exhibit "E"). These studies i'r,dicated that the only place landscaping could adequately screen the storage area from the freeway would be to place it within the CalTrans freeway right-of-way. CorrespondenriF, from Ca1Trans (see Exhibit "H") stated that an agreerrr ,ot in accordance with the Stirling Act (AB 2330, Chapter" E 7) `s acceptable for the placement of landscapingg within their righ"t of-way. The applicant proposes to plant Oleanders in "he upp!or portion of the slope (see Exhibit "CrI). Staff antic ip.,sr6s tiiat the proposed freeway landscaping at maturity will be r�egvate t-i screen the outdoor storage area from view of tine Devore Freeway. Commission policy would also require full land-aping of the freeway right-of-way which adjoins the ,n*therly portion' of the site. C. Variance: In conjunction with this Conditional Use Permit request, the applicant has also submitted a Variance application to allow landscaping as a method of screening the prrposed outdoor storage area from the future Regional Trail along Day Creek. The Regional Trail is proposed to be located west of, and adjacent to, the SCE right-of-way proposed for outdoor storage (see Exhibit "D"). Regional Trails are considered as land used in common; therefore, screening is ' required between outdoor storage areas and trails. The Industrial Specific Plan (Section IV.A.6.f.) requires a wall or fence to t,,creen the storage area. Southern California Edison and the Saa Bernardino Trans portation/F1'ood Control:Department do not prefer this more "permanent" method; therefore, a f Variance has been proposed to, allow landscape screening. ' In addition, correspondence from the San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control Department Indicated that PLANtVING GOMMI$510N STAFF REPORT RE: CUP 89-10, Vq 89-09 AMPAG AuguLt 9; 1989 Page 4 reference would be to rate the landscaping p p p ng on the actual prefect site (the Southern California Edison Utility Corridor) for two reasons: 1. Improvements to this section of the Day Creek Channel, between Arrow Route and railroad are to begin in the first quarter of 1990, thereby making construction efforts difficult if landscaping is planted in close proxinitr to the construction tune; aad 2. It would be appropriate for the applicant to place landscaping on the actual area they are leasing for outdoor storage, Instead of Flood Control District property. In turn, Southern California Edison requires that all landscaping within 'their rights-of-way not - exceed a i;wight of fifteen (15) feet. As stated ear14Qr, if approved, all landscaping plans, as s= well as the Conditions of App-,- val attached to this project, will be revieNed :and approved by Edison prior to occupancy by AMPAC. The intent behind having a fence or wall screen outdoor storage areas from land used in common was to achieve maximum obscurity of the outdoor storage areas in the shortest length of time. However, in thus irstance, other public agencies (Southern California- Edison and the Sari-,,. Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control Deoar.,tment) prefer to have their land remain as intact as possible and have no "permanent" structures located on their properties. Landscaping is considered to be less "permaneW;11 by these agencies and they find its use acceptable in concept. Staff also concurs with the use of landscaping in this part{cu,a&r instance for the following reasons: 1. The Regional Trail vlong D;,y Creek, adjacent to the outdoor storage area, is not completed. The timeline for improvements would indicate that the landscaping will be planted prior to fill Improvements of the proposed Regional frail along the flood control channol, Regional Trait improvements of the proposed Regional Trail along the channel are not foreseen by staff in the near future. Therefore, if placed properly, the landscaping will hale some time to mature and form a more complete screen prior to Regional Trail completion; and PLANING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: CUP 89-10, VA 89.09 - AMPAC August 9, 1989 _ Page 5 2. Landscaping is an accepted method of screening outdoor storage areas from other types of public rights-of-way (i.e., landscaping is proposed to be utilized for; screening the Or ire Freeway from this particular outdoor storage area). Based upon these facts, staff finds the pt.iposed landscape scenario (see Exhibit "D") acceptable for screening the future Day Creek Regional Trail from the proposed outside storage area and that srict interpretations of the Industrial Specific ,Plan and Development Code would cause unnecessary hardship and deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by other property, cwnars in the immediate area. D. Jesign Review Committee: On June 8, 1985,, the Committee (Chitiea, ToIstoy,Coleman) reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the following; 1. Color contrasts should be provided within: the freeway landscape screen through the use of O1Qander species other than "Sister Agnes" or a variety acceptable to CalTrans. The placement of the new species shall be done as to brraa up the repetition of the white flowers for( xtended distances. 2. The freeway 'shrubs should be one (1) gallon size planted three (3) feet on center. 3. Fees in-lies of full slope planting should be provided for the freeway frontage that abuts the Edison property and project site. 4. The screening device between the future Day Creek Regional Trail and the outdoor storage site should be landscaping installed prior to utilizing the site for outdoor storage. A non-toxic species should be 'selected that is consistent with the objectives of the City Planning Division and Southern California Edison requirements. This landscaping shcdld be located on the Edison right- of-way. 5. A 'Variance application will be required to allow landscaping as a means, of screening the outdoor storage area from the Day Creek Regional Trail. E. Technical Review Committee: On June'6, 1989, the Technical Review Committee reviewed the project and determined that with the. recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is Ptl',SNINf COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: 'CUP'89-10, VA 89-09, AMPAC August 9, 1989 Page fi consistent with all gpplfcab�/, standards rnd ordinances„ No - grading (other than weed clear//ng, 1 hich will be submitted as a rough grading plan) was prop sed Gi' required on this site for utilization ,.as outdoor ; s_brage; therefore, the 'Grading Committee wa,,. -tot required to review this particular, project. F,, Environmental Assessment: Upon reviewkof Part. I of the Initial Study and completion of Part II of•he Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related' to an outdoor storage area at this particular location. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order far the Planning Commission to approve ConditionalUse Permit 89-1,0 and Variance 89-09, facts to support the following findings must,ue made: A. Conditional Use Permit 89-10 1. fiat the prop(4'ed Use is in, acce;d with the Generail Plan, the objectives of the 'Industrial Specific Plan and th, :purposes of the district in which the site locat�0. 2. That the proposed use, together with he conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or mater•aIlly injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. B. Variance 89-09: 1. That strict or literal inte:rprelrlors and enforcement of the specified regulation would rciult in practical d Jficul ty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Industrial Specific, Man and Development' Code, 2. That because the Regional Trail along the Day Creek Flood Control Channel, adjacent to the outdoor storage area, is not completed and landscaping will be Ctti+tted and able to mature prior to Reg'onai Trail improvements, there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or i to the intended use of the property that; do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone.; I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: CLIP 89"10, VA 89-09 AMPAC August 9, 15C,9 Page 7 AdWh 3, That landscapire is an accepted means of screening other outdoor storage areas from public rights-of- way. 4. That, the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant for special privilege i ncorrsi stent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. 5. That thz grand-, of the Variance will not be detrimenta, t,' the public health, safety, or welfare, or/',aCerially injurious to properties or improvemen&,'fil the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: The CGrditional' 'Use Permit and. Variance application-shave been advertised as public hearings in The_ Daily RekZ,,t newspaper and properly posted, and notices sent to adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of be 'Conditional Use Permit 89-10 and Variance 89-09 through a apt nn ofi the attached Resolutions of Approval. Respe tfu su Bra Bull City nner BB:SH:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Proposed Landscape Plan for the Devote Freeway Right-of-Way Exhibit "D" - Proposed'Landscape Plan for the Day Creek Regional Trail Exhibit "E" .Sight Line Profile for Storage Area . Exhibit "F" - Correspondence from Southern California Edison Dated July 10, 1989 and May 15 1989 Exhibit "a" - Correspondence from the.Sari Bernardino County-Transportation/Flood Control Department Dated June 29, 1989 and May 18, 1989 Exhibit "H" - Correspondence from Cal Trans Dated May 9, 1989 Exhibit "I" Letter From Applicant Providing Justification for the Variance Request Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 89-10 fi and Standard Conditions Resolution of Approval for Variance 89-09 67--? t �t o Q . oo� a ❑ _ a a ❑ ' loab �° I i cy 13 O ocaooaoaaaoa° e� NORTH OFq ITEM: Ri-wl RAaCnv CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION '1, 67— �`�.' i 1 t lip i NO SCALE �� � �* ,� �,► cu.�. . 1 I I r � 1 J l 1 mm w f . 1 DMO 1 1 � � oawearrrar Lb I OF i i 1 1 1 . wow 1 i C OF ITEM EM ?9—10 d`V.'l aHAj Ui �� RAN CHO CUCAMOMU TITLE: 5i+z P}An PLANNING DIVISION J,t—q EXHIBIT: '.�SCALE: L`yL. 1o.a "�'' AdaL 1p IN 17 SECTION VIEW SCALE: NGRz 1'=1a VERT. 1'- IQ' DOMMM GRADE :INTERSTATE 15 . (NGRNWU,o wo) 15.5 ' I �4 N itl'NtRM�t AT,MAC I={ 75 St=AGN8 i I [ PER NTH 3,PEMU AM t P UNO Na"WM)Eq t1 WTURAY-15'x1aE PLAN VIEW a1Axluaa NaTE 20' t+IM 41 Stu. F-IT Try i AGA '.T E F�L♦ '7�1JE/iViy.i'�Gji;WIOE FQdJ.OYS B�'RUV)Z ' 20 iA{iF/ RANIM IN UMM OF 10 SIOAS, FOR THE EN41RE DWANCE OF 2W. �CITY OF iTrkU.- cue Propc • Oevc,�e rrce . PLANNING DIVISION 3 ExIiI]3IT:. SCALE: ti S' SC�1 E NOfaZvmr ;n....:'az .. AMA asm Rom 1 • afm No aAW.A I ! I 4/—L 1 REGIONAL TRAIL LXN6sCA m ol-zu' ram- _P[AN"M PRUNM FSWAATA Fm OK OW 'Cf�M1�FFtfi 5 ' ,W-W H12i s*wss- PWMFRM to,HM NORTH 'CH# E PNO1iMR i5'1Nktii (2X-,,' Y OF i i IM: CA y�p�q �N p„sEo4 SCALD , o i m? cs CITY ,q t� ,may y�'q ITEM:...c���y�}� <�� ,•'`c r i c+1 t.t+C' NCHO NNIN0 DIVISION EXHIBI O.�� ..SCALE: Ar �e� i, Southern C5, fornfa Z-41son Company SUITE 210 430 NORTH VINEYARD AVENUE ONTARIO.CALIFORNIA 91784 EASTERN A£OIOri TELEPHONE LAND SERVICES DIVISION FAX PEAL PROPERTIES ANO ADNINIsrRAT E sE!'VICES City of Rancho Cucamonga July 10. 1989 P.O.Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Stevt. Hayes Planning Division Gentlemen: SUBJECT: Request for City Permit Concrete Pipe Storage (ANIPAC. Inc) Assessors Parcel No, 229-121-15 This is in response to your letter of June 14, 1989 concerning; suggested landscap?ng along the Edison transmission line right of way for the proposed equestrian trail. It has generally been Edison policy that shrubbery within our rights of way not be allowed, however, when allowed, the maximum tree height should be no more than 15 feet, Each; of the suggested species could exceed 40 feet upon maturation. It is Edison's desire to assist AMPAC Iae, in securing a Conditional Use F,-rrnit; however, it should be noted that a final review and approval of all requirements imposed upon AMPAC Inc., must be made by Edison prior to the issuance of a license for the use of the subject property. If you should have: any further questions regarding this matter, please call me at (714) 395-3325. Very truly yours, f ' f GENE ST BBLEFIELD Real Properties Agent QYY OF ITEM;PLANNING TIN+G DT'TIZIONr EXHIBIT .—,,T1--zC" SCALE: .r Southerr Callfolmla Edison Company SUITE 21 O 430 NORTH VINEYARD AVENUE CNTARIO.CALIFORNIA 91764 EA"rRN REGION TELEPHONE LA NO S.RVICES DIVISION P tt71 Ai]E33]43 PEA:,PROPERTIES ANO AONINISTRATIVE SERVICES City of Rancho Cucamonga May 15, 1989 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Attention: Permits Office , Gentlemen: SUBJECT: Consent to Landscape Improvements Luga-Mira Loma 500 kV T/L R/W (Fee) Etiwanda-Padua 220kV T/L R/W (Fee) RP File NO. G2-89-2012ES We have performed a preliminary review of the proposal for landscaping on Caltrans property in the vicinity of Arrow Highway on I-15, in , accordance with our conversation at the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division on April 25, 1989. This proposal was developed by Ampac"s Consulting Engineers, Krueplr Engineering, from general concepts discussed at that meeting. While any definitive apr .aval must await a final and comprehensive Conditional Use Permit la be issued by the City of rancho Cucamonga through its Planning Cc"nmission and we reserve our rights to make such comments and changes as we think appropriate at that time, ke find the submitted proposal acceptable. Very truly yours, GENE STUBBLEFIELD CJ Real Properties Agent CITY OF IiEs..�wa�in.V�" RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE.- PLAN SING DIVISION '�D 1Z -�`� EXHIBIT: SCALE: � WPORTATION{FLOCJ CONTROL couF(Tr(WUNBfff a No DEPARTMENT \�d�tlJj,,f t+1»EWRONMIZATAL uc oaxsaoWw IstThtrd Strm • San 8anudko.CA V,"0-0835 •(7141387.2800 KEN J1 MILLER June 29, 3989 J Pm File:. 1-602/2.04 City of Randso Cucam� P. o. � 807 Original Poor Quality Rancho , CA 91730 Attention: Mr. M-44 Hayes. Re: Zone.1, Day Creek Clnatuuel C,enticmen: Reference is Z dti to your letter dated JUM 14, 1983, roga�the City s C=ditiwal Use Permit No. 89-10 to AMPAC, ==er ning the City's eo iro.m:, to screen AWAC'S proposers pipe storage area from the Lay Creek Cho *1 aid t*ne City-p tonal trail. The District's approximate ti.Jm line for constx�on of c3na ml ids at Day Creek Chazmel, from Arrow Route to the Southern Pacific Railroad, , to advertise in November or De=bw, 13g0, =%5tructiG n is estimated to begun in the first quarter of 199o, and=mtnuction is expected to]Last for apprmdmately ona Year. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact the undersigned at (714) 387-2633. Very truly YC'ar's, +'.. '���" LJTTST'.�M.M. Ii{C) M2 S� Field Engineering Division WW:es cc: Chria Bea, A:M'AC Ka>i MIReading File 9 ITEM... COP G DIVISION E HMM "..Ll"' SCALE: TRANSPORTATION/Ft,4r' CONTROL ', CWOY OF SAN&MWOW . ` i KWO w0.1ms,ftau cy s28 Exit third Sw�c• Um U"Wina,CA 9$dtlS-0aa ►( 1M1t 3Ai=28Q�1 ! ``� K+l AM MAY 23 ur«ter 16 WO-2 1--601/2.04 j city of P. 0. Box 807 j , CA 91730 E Attention, YX. Stem Hayes Gentlemen: R0* Zone 1, Day Czeek t Refer is mde to letter dated MY 3I989, w4 se:kraitta3ss fz=AMPAC F dated Kly 2, U89, rwXmdirq s proposed regional trail along tics D3stri is f DaY C ragedam, and of the area f= MrMC-,s Posed pipe Please be advised rd*plaoment of the propoS d immix almJ't tray cz x Omllaal is consistent with District allmU r, rginesaT is ai 3 ai+xq � other flail � �Cilities thin 'i oof roncbo st �. G� I plans have3 been ty Iish a regicria2, trail along tkX1 Day txeeir �1, the District will enter i.. a cza�n use 49ZW -nt with the City. In regards to the sczoerdM dovice required for this typa of proposW developer the District sad zeOnacnnd and lwxuby reqwats the device rl►rlt within District ric c-raf-fir. Zt wcxtld s va a arepriah.4 proposed developer P�ems x�uld be placed wittsin t The District motes the cpporWaity to review t As prcpo!�,rd pM a �icrut 106XS forward to warIcing with tba City on, the proposed re#Qnlal trail vistem• If you have ally cat ons rx-ardir4 the alaOM, PIOW"OtIntazt thh tuxie=ignea. at (714) 3$7 2633, � l Very ts`�y YM=l G iC:es Field&Vbwxieq Division cc. C. Beal, AMC R, Nantes Mvfvqmmdixq File RANCHO CUCAMONGA TiTut �. � efawf c a.6r e&�,a STATE OF AUFORNIA-6USlt1FM TRANSIOVATION AND HOUSING AGENCY --� - GEORGE CEU7VAElUW Gowmw. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0M RICT S,P.O.BOX 231 -SM EERNAROMO,CA 92103 May 9, 1989 Mr. Paul Toomey Krueper Engineering Associates, Inc. 568 N. Mountain View Ave. San Bernardino, CA 92401 gear Mr. Toomey: We have reviewad your conceptual plans and have the following comments: The conceptual landscape plans of planting oleander shrubs "Sister Agnes" on the Interstate 15 freeway for a distance of 2,600 feet, in tt-- vicinity of Arrow Highway, is approved subject to the following: a Prior to any work within State right of way, ar. , .coachment permit :From the State is required. o All landscape and irrigation plans shall ne prepared to State standards, signed and stamped by a registered Landscape Architect. o The City and/or Ampac shall enter into an agreement fnr maintenance of the arojee- for a period of 20 years, Please submit all future plans to our Permit office. 7f there are any que`'tions, please contact George Nadow, District Landscape Architect dt (714) 383-4519. Very truly yours, Original signed V. _ ;gra F. 80CANEGRA, Design Enginee_ PS&E support GN:km// cc: *, pac, Attn. Chris Bea City of Rancho Cucamonga RKarns i Permits CW, OF ITEM. L�-291 'RAN rRUEi9ER ENGINEERING & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENCHWOE'MNO 6 SURVMMG i ACCMM7ANALYSiS AND CONSULTMY SGS NORTH MOUNTAW VWWAVWRMS[COMPLOOM04 MBOtMARC,$W.0 UFORMA92401-1291a714.8BL_i"9 FAX No.714-G8&WO July 21, 1999 Plus"Reftr To our Fla No. City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Community.Develcpment Planning Division PLst Office Box fS07 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Steve Hayes, Project Planner Regarding: Conditional Use Permit 89-10, AMPAC, INC. Dear Steve On behalf of AMPAC, INC. we a-e requesting a variznce fro: 9 General Plan and Development Code with regard to screening along s.4e Regional Trail adjacent t. the subject site. As you have indicated, a solid screening device is required to block the view into the storage area from the regional trail. The trail i proposed to be constructed within the Day Creek Channel, owned by the. San Bernardino fouiity Flood Control District which is adjacent to Southern California Edison right-of-way (the site of the C.U.P.). The justifir-tion for the variance can be established by the fact that AMPAC has auth ty or control on either property to allow construct' a .,+"k wall or solid fence. These properties are cantrollea +r agencies, to which a permanent constructed device is uncccepto.. There is extensive landscaping proposed along the trail which will do � much to screen the storage area. This method of screening has been used along the freeway to block the view to the same storage areas. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, KTp PER ENGINEERING !4 ASSOCIATES, INC. Paul Too M/y Planner _ PT:pnt qYOF b-VANCHO CUCAMON(. °AA of i F�AN 'IN DIVI ION D S-I F PXH1B1T: f RESOLUTION P.O. A RESnLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMO,IGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL. USE 'PERMIT NO. 89-10. FOR A R%UEST TO ESTA.305H OUTSIDE. STORr''iE WITHIN,. SOUTHERN CALIFORNtI' EDISON EAS6'SNT OF 113v7,• ACRES IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DEVCLOPMENT"CISTRICT (SUZAREA:_15) .Ot, THE INW1.17RIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH;.SIDE OF ARNOV AOUTE, EAST OF ANI*i ADJACENT TO THE DEVOR� FREEWAY, AND MAKING FINOINGr-;" ,UPPORT THEREOF - APN; '229-121-16 A. Recitals. 0) AMPAC, Inc. has fi`ted an,application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Pormit Nn: $9-10 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in f1his'.,Aesolutiont the subject Cokitiunal U,e Permit request is referred to as "the application.", (ii) On the 9th of August, 1989, the Planning Commission, of the City 7ancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application conrluded said hearing on that date. , (iii) All legal prerequisites to thN adoption of this Resolution r, occurred, 0. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it, is herby found, determined and resolved by'the Planing Commission of the City of'Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commfssion hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true. and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced 'public hearing on August n; 1989,_ including r—itten and oral , Istaff reports, together with public testimony, this Cu,wission hereby sAocificatly finds as foliows-. (a) The application applies to property located on t�.e south side of Arrow Route, east of the Jevore Freeway, with a street frontage of approximately 650 feet and l;t depth of 1,,200 feat and is presently unimproved; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a freeway { and vacant, the property to the south o" that site consists of vacant 'land, I the property to the east is a manufacturing and storage facility, and ;the property to the west is a flood control channel; and 1 a PLANNING COtS1MI5SZON RESOLUTION NO, RE. CUP 89-10 -5 AhiPAC August 9, 1989 Page 2 J (c) The outdoor storage wiil be screened with landscaping consistent with the intent of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 3. Ba- I upon the substantial evidence-presented to this Co .,fission ` during tha above-referenced public hearing and upon the, specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby.finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Developmant Code, and the: purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the; proposed ,:fie, together- with tht' conditions applicable thereto, will not be detriae'ntal to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially- injurious:' 'to ,properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That th_ proposQd use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Indu��:Ial Specific Plan and Development Cade.- 4. lls:s Coni ission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewer and considered in compliance with the California Environmental IS Quality Act of 70 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon tree findings and conclusions set forth in 'paragraphs 1, 2 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached :teret;�'ard incorporat&,-herein by this reference. Planning Division � 1) If the operation' of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, - including, butr not limited to, noise, the Conditional Use Pe:mit�'shall be .brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible termination of the use. 2) The facility shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards for the Heavy Industrial Development District, including, but not limited to, noise levels. 3) Landscaping and irrigation for screening shall be planted along the 1-15 Freeway prior to utilizing the''site for outdoor storage, as follows: 41 PLANNING OMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, RE t „'UP,80-10 » AMPAC August'9, 1989 Page 3 a) Between Arrow Route and Santa Fe Railroad Tracks - A 3-foot wide shrub planting near the top of the slope embankment shall be providLW in accordance with Exhibit 'C" of the August 9, 19.89 staff report and as described as follows: I Color contrasts shall be provided :within the freeway landscaped screen through the use of Oleander species other, than "Siste- ,Agnes" or a variety acceptable to`CalTran,�, The placement of the new species siirl] be done as to break up the repetition of the white flowers for extended distances;,and 2) , the freeway-shrubs shall be one-gallon S size planted three feet on center. r> b) Between Arrow Route and bar Creek Channel Where the . Southern California Edisot property (project site) abuts the 1-15 Freeway, frcm.AFrow Route sou-th to the Day Creek Channel, the applicant shall landscape and irrigate the full slope embankment with the I-15 Freeway right-of- way. Said landscaping shall be in accordance with a master plan as approved by CalTrans,, the City Planner, and City Engineer, Written correspondence as to the acceptability of the proposed freeway landscaping plan, Shall ' be received orior to the-occupancy af.°ch, Southern California Edison property: However is Cal7rans will not allow the incremental construction of scid landscaping with this project, a cash payment in-lieu of construction as a contribution to a future comprehensive project shall be made to the City prior to the utilization of this site for outdoor storage, 4) The screening device hetween the future Day Creek Regional Trail and the outdoor storage site shall we landscaping installed prior to utilizing the site for outdoor storage. .A non- ' toxic species shall,` be selected that is consistent. with the objectives of the City � Pr y 3, > PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: CUP 89-10 - AMPAC " August 9, 1989 Paef Planning Di:?scA and Southern California Edison rcg0remeii'c's. This landscaping shall be located within ths'; Edison right-of-way. A landscape plan for:,ihe entire distance of the Regional Trail thdt abuts the project site shall be approved by Southern California Edison and City Planner, 5) Outdoor storage aitiv%ties shall be limited to finished storm drainpipe only. 6) The stacking of the storm drain pipe shall not exceed a maximum height of fifteen `(16) feet, or the maximum height of 'landscaping that Southern California Edison will allow within their rights-of-way. 7) A rough grading, permit shall be reviewed and approved by the Building & Safety Division prior to any outdoor storage occurring on the site,. 8) The surface of the circulation system through AOL the outdoor storage area shalll„be treated with a material that reduces the amount of� blotting dust and sand, such as crushed aggregate or slag,!-.Prior-to any outdoor storage activities. 9) Written certification of approval from Southern California Edison regardin, the contents within this Resolution of Approval shall be. received by the City Planner prior to t`w,utilization of - the proposed site;for:•outdoor storage. _ En1ini;erin9 Division The existing storm drainage retention area at the south end of the site shall be enlarged'-�a. accommoCate three (3) consecutive 100-year storms with no discharge to Day Creek, The basin design shall be approved by the City` Engineer and Southern, California Edison on the basis of the . final drainage study, The developer shall be respons.ibte for removing the interim facility upon;comi,jetion of the Phase - I1A Day Creek Channel; impro °Aments and a local sattr7 drain to serve the `property and the 0hrje6rty to the east. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, RF: CUP 89-10 - AMPAG A,;sust 9, 1989 Page 5 2) Provide the following storm drain easements: a7 33 feet wide along the north project boundary in favor of the City,; and - b? 25 feet wide along the south project boundary in favor of the property to the east:, and cj A temporary easement for the construction and maintenance of an interim retention facility, 37 Material s,shalI be stored in ;such-.a ma�ner as to not, impede or .direct flood flows ,.o the east. All materials shall be secui,-..d to prevent to downstream properties. 6. The Secretary` to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST, I989 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY; Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller,-Secretary Is Brad Buller, 5eovgtary-,�z,f the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that. the foregoing Resolution was duly and l regularly introftced, sassed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the l City of Ranch; Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the gth day of August, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERSt NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: OMMISSIONERS: - ky s�x a_r u o�u r> p a.o w q a M���•6•pY' N C O C N C L M MT w+4 6 OI'T -NvwO .P CL S �.CY N S N i y�yI 'p I. �.V t t.2 L cOc eeG iY.gwa bt wY�O yq . 6Yc� 4Y ...LL qAZ Y y oED O�a q� Y'06N(. o u rd �' •... Y.r.auE ® OCgNA, iIN ®gpgy 6.R 52 a Ra yy� NY. �4 vo ^ .6 01rWu� 4 y u ypC it. cmE.rv�'nS a'aV1 SayJ� �aa. Y®ai q9 H�9d o~Y � a V MO �� p d. pq,G' DYyG x—V4 a >��!� ARU1yy QLw J.Mq 'yb4�gN . O y RCN Nxr.� Y.S~ ��y� $f. �ooy-.��q�Vu ofyyoa yyyF' .7y�pl' Y� or�x'g mVq q�Y.yR■Vy a ^p �Yy> Got a M2 CNCF� - a L C Q K g NC 3 q G cu r g q q L q^~ q O, O Qy Y yY� , Tq, y� t aYq Ny 11C O Wy01_q CYQ 6 �Gy Ye 4 �� gN N S.S�YY3 Cy 9Y .._.5 i 7T$ �� L CG �p 9«q■ q nN G6�ILNn � �qPS ■ IL �w�.. eeC,Y� �9�c&+W udr. v�iCCY•Yr C� `dp;a~QS` o��" Yct Y YYVA�NyCyd YC N^e NO OC YY"' NY Q V' � may¢ �yry.�� D. Is .26 Zo L�.oYYd G>•O Y� C N Q NMI NY qT SLY�iI p��4-fir.''. H u�6 '� y r�aOR QMV �N.c gig 4 yW� �N q Y Y�p —7y� p� 5.. y:I. �ry�VyCY V G9'Y■ . � `: may(' � �. �O`� Y O p. Lp ••�V,v���`� ZJ V A QaC, � > RC �.YMCG V C �.'w.�'y lit c o��g _ �. 4YY O dip .Nq+ Oap7 Ii.y ug AI4y� b �M ry V CV}mN w� . aC�N tttti30�QY. 46{.b. Yyy33yW G C Q® ^p�Y L CN .� '0'r dn~ Wwi.~S F4o.N. uq ei u Kay N,,�pLj �c®�x>Y � q y- yhr ��'�i ¢NG 55iiM~OIMY 9 �y C iDT pt tL ^4'{y� }�3 LyyC NNM ,L1 L �'d Cqlw tiyq y.'wC V LVCbppo� - .M+. r CaM Oee,yL p '.dam �w�N ■V9 CO di U`._� T SY b"u�a' Uti Wd1t 4xLv .�k y Y4 Y aC 4.Vg C^' r.MNa6' "Ol y� M - yL �aj V.w.d Nw O L u 6 C??f�,,+:}??,' sit q.1p.. LV Ty1 A L o d `S pN hilt O�u�a�{x, r~�4w pi,.. p €'� as Nq a S 0 4J �al�-a.N is w o ^uqq. Eli; N pg. . U +Bj- L C Nr�b. NYtly. ap�C4,.N BFNw1, Y+�'pN.Y� ..y�°�L NY ye.pr- aN co $y Y�M�1 _ -d=�...C.Y V]Iyt �4N. i.GMqM. Y+�iY F YC �..alC+ Mi.'[iM��pQ,,yY gy■Yt'N�O1p� ..Y+IYAiO1.�nIISq �Y�CC���RR �+'0 uY •�`^.. stCyC�a L .Y ' A�^.NYy r 9i yG �Uy 3 L � QY�6 q4 . �u� ^Sy@^ N V V b. y qy �C V vr V C r. yy F V 11 t yy YI..L O aO� rN AySp aC� �1� C p` ,y0� dCr 9 Y O "A N.V V y. (�!� '�...i of Y` CV---a* COYp StYb LV yW ��yyppW U q>f�e N j ^YOB. : t�1gff N L ip> yu. Y et8 Ek fiyQ+ '..L qd� ^ �{Wa QNy �Y� �C�C.a' v.�aey. , CR Cy QI ^ N.g p.4 NMtYy,� N@q nm■aa■ Ypa Cy$A qK NyN.��}ju� Hal. y YN yy��Y VZ ` L 4 yyy LayV Wa Nu �� Y V Z y� U a - C.oYf'L'., wuN.�' oe•— c�.$ seq. �,E'o �yp'Q.. q`r �"i u,,,a•6a:#[9 :z�u+gy Z. ilC yLN 1 `N}p ^YV.0 �. �s yig qC`��qa y�VNCyy� j �,�+• SUE all rz • K^VYyy+A4a{G�C�q1E C��4q �•iM,+.134j. M�Ay Ly?MCJg�C^�4Wb�VN2.O"d M1NVNJ7 3�''.z. C-...a sN NN.yN S$ pa sV gpYaC Q Q~- �YVyL'O4OpLpY�.'.��M��VliYtl{!���gaN4R,_I_.C2yb�C+.!N��Cp�`1iy99ppt. CiVICqC'�J`rJppadp sNp�p�r st^NNNN YMU{WACt"�yNy^�� iIhC$L�-.it.ia^ezYt>i.1Y2t1'.�GwN' db 11 CAV. i \ 'JI NL.UQc M *n' "o0it 15 Qx crom� ■ 73t! = `y s ea a+w O 9412 �'do V� Cy�� Fg � p� uM qAY NN QUu VLL [.J D3R)q >�{)�A4 iY,GY W N C L W. � a L C z �. IS ' O xl ram'" -a s9 . Cf�O.Chi. NdM QQ tl_4 3 v'b* - -- `W v Rrc C zg- sous cis~ w.�py L JiL$MQppsM �$' -'«, YN 1► ;Y NyY� Y M sYY .yy1 f��/ (� CN�� Y.j� 6t Pl3>.y4 yi.YYpI •� YCyq Lyy L44 Yy�/►SpyN Cy>,�iC N]F..=4pt�. �r-/t -. !�' c'A a a u'a<FAKa n' Ne. cc y�wM WY Ct'c 8a1�R yCy µ~ `` C a yYN 31Y pw qw. vi Csp+si y« ; k �x`tL � �NGA� 4 M NrNMN KN.D. K M '.ENO 1^N95. 'S 14 A,1frw.tilt 01N GB �L'�I wC 4 rf Qi y� pA 4i K }_ "p Y +.. w tQ�Op_ C C >p■ 4L w��Mlix L roGro R �9 G> Is Y*:yN7 _Y(M(,� 12 MA iqi . yGM Yi w� 4�Q�Y O .p..It LMY' C�L LA 2.2. NGw OM C4V� A iJr Y. N �Ly.yaqt Y4 yAw. y Ypp��M L ±;a It M N4LC ti C 44 sNu• N. O fib ! YY.. 6 M Y. 9 w L FA '� ti'� '� 4 *' M.. L ✓L �p y Q .,4.N� .yt A. '1• qri Vr �ti. p'�L� O �Ca` �ya tY.1wµNN YLG �N Nbyy ,CxeS�'l� y �y� CC"O u Lu 44� �5�. �p w'O Mw` y dp r�Vu VV '�Q y �L �> £/�tlyr��.1b��' ® aY yr �YN wi_.qp LA ybD Om i-cla '..iL. Cab *A-.'j `IS 134WW.tlQ C•~ + C � # a r, r.w. rt' A CCQ$ G,C4• GYL Y'O.E A. C ♦. iiC^. _YY� Sw. D YL•w�i 07'Mee 26 YC& . sNy�p 7ro �4 AN N� Ld r"G 6f�a N..Or a NOtq +V� r.M 4�ixC w0 tNM CcyM~O. G4 yy 414 N. L wbCyy 6k. V `4� Q� rM. aOal'�. V dAp 4L 49yf Y p!r'y 0.�� Ni «w YQ'.�i i1 r4„ 4pY 9�C'CyV q Y wy y4�S C G.NO ++9��Q CCNre. 'MV UYVC A'. `Ow Y OL .may Lp� �Y. Oi`r'a CC4 p wry US V p�Cr.. NY LN Cs 6yy�yp�yYy�vp. � ,Ywy w� CM„:i^A y�yV V ■.w �A 3� Y"LYN4 Nw M~wywVC� O u ■ t S p � ?� 12, KAt +C4N I+Y.GN <GS CG A-—a �4Q tL C KN W4M-5 aZZ l "� f A .FN i�S�y�. YT ti ^�w sg'.w .t7�t►. �N 53;Y9 1 a)CC1V m L� CygC ywY LL� w� yylf � V■�+ . qY C. o^■■+ �Fn.1� �i���� �NH [�, pCJ..C�O w^p6Yp1 SOL� �A Ali V s«� i �`"Gyg maxi w A$; O$s as w Um'> oy•��� ±dr� � gEJ�y L�L�A er1•'�'iC, Y ^.` ceo 'e rnw o^a oa yw m=a,' JJN .-„� {L�3Vy` q� ,t°28: `�' .4S�cuya. ibi '� � L+(� �axiaw.g& �8w n" It v^o a tl quY«� Apup, � C CYO � i Y A L Yy W yu{�LY {y MN �Q u e� �. •� V aY+C^ m=� Qy■CL Lp. Y, y Jm Yz�.N 4y�YY� O4{>�Y .CN.C�¢QLtl �JL�L�L�. ,CN..�S SVO V�&1 �Wy�r aC+ �aVd yM`O.�OY� L ? wu w CLw I�w:O.V. ={.4.1�a. F.;q N _ FYWY•. 6a nal `9=m N LN � y{� 4 ♦ w ® s �9 uL 0 3�YC -33 Y� 3 �"ZI uN-yy� N cad �.CC� pywn « Q� V pp •."�� N C jai►, �La `�aJ ��C s.! �.y� � 'LYS.g a^MC A��� C .C" � Y � 4Y� `n >�= M� �e�L �.u�• MV VfrZ.�O�,, _.. 'm c c 3 G l7 c� ++ WY%Y Yp•MNY•yVn. � WC` Y .�L•. t LL G N •�N 4� L�Y A O �..,N ,� tl E a�0 yyy■ �{p� c Y■ C 4 �_L `:CZr J � �yy" ��o. �'`O3 Va o. `•�Ca. N,`Z '"yV 1py. N`U s..�. b��..p,V 302 y J4@ 9^ G4 Y O.Y _ A& C>cN .Z C�'�.RO.Y .. z;` MV�OL -C y Gw qVq C P Ns V 6 ryj� a L�1 L Q1 ~ ONia q ;{O� y Atr OY67� YV• C. UAr07� N �OI�.w N. �~ Cain 4Y Ma YN aL. Y tt Yi ' ta4i t! '.. C.44k, yfu1 A �Ye� 6C,p y1.y= y6 dY �V� �LV 3 K3.�Yy C. a 7 VN gCq�O C giiiYN.L uN^ Na�C N CC V C 4A 2!{�w C. Pilo sO ■'�w C tL C�"'i�0i W w0� Oti•.CY �. IN Ods G"dp A* ♦ y Yam+ w Oa,G �• O C i �rY \ C- �4.JlNC w G loq NFL iV�u~ y V M..:c+ sw 66 y ,C pCq{ ty 11YY 01�.� f i__N aY Y O V Yp L C tlC $ ■ y 16.- OVN.N U li W22 a Y Tj i1 as 79o234 Sat \, ANY �OOLL�QM. YYiaylJ h � C W �u�'�gSN� M y A O � La a=c a tom.} a 0 _+ L Cu: n u a 40Z NMI M .—a y~,C LL€ Y bgtOI »60L wY LY Cpti� ^r¢l S M. Y�O.� KOpIV.p,C 4L'YY tli O 4 � f�$ w� p p yC�y 6�.y, NC L CL /� A"'5 ^Yw VY 4C N NWC N N. 4 4. u 6 `YY N �0t0 e+rib .Nnl�.r a^ � yLy1 L. �.Nr.N'u� SY. O nM 4Ypp Oyyi ,� Mp VB r~Cry N I Yp O. A N Y VSs' 1q,,.Y •�^' 6.q V OQA�� Sl�,n •Sw. D¢ Y Y �C O! 1 !/A Va{_3y�Y 4� Oa LC V}Y t�J�f2{��Y p Y LLai� C C.0rd py2 IYA r . OY me 0 G9C Y 1 pY LO1 k» YOl it CYV all. OIL LOY N =''�^ u°■ni. a t�ji Y� � ���i. a'� � � `aM,p.,.d ���'a``�Gc. �.VrS YP 015% va C es .4. Y (J O yr O wqc � Lnw.sN t.V. �a x: �apr.r aAa `�:'s maul' .yY� s pip _a �1 'V YaNfA.V aHwT q'S I'PG y_B YqOt 4 'ir• .Q..A 'g s: Q1 aM 243! i Y` Y O •V VM '�+`'�V YVO.� C V y ^�! 3C /� ppy{j l C L V M M L Y ty pY + p MqV® OG *$ .'J -Y C M M N�wq. yCU Lrp" 00 py+i O L�N x w Y g Y 4 N• GGY W� Yw �r CP 4Y: +yO' i0 �J �V �C ~CNS �r O'� y_pg6nGVY � 14 61µ 00.� MO C 'VM YV R11Y OA.. Ny� Y N wM¢, M-S of.f. '332w ...p .'�.��4, Cw Yy Np VCM� r. ypypN O. Ad, Yt1d� 9erT. *uuY 7. G.+2 NYQs A �. 3'VI S`yQ.Y Oyy � �ca. V'�4 q ■o M �e ►�pO Q� C a o Y J a Y N O i.Y CT• V O Y6Y�b V C OIa +p aN C��« SY 9LYU O C . aL■ tkcLV i N'sp■. YYp 4N OY N 'iCP O� 1w Y�y tD, �L1Yw� 1 it o a iOcii38 D LLo.1NV � ~pw. pypy d ~yy� Vz; A 1 N 1+1 ! C N 17 +rP N W `e10 u��>��>yy{ram'+ w k >tr 3♦ � � ." N. ^� N �N[.�y}u. �S NULL LpPCyy¢ LL�++ �YS�,,.�,��^r..§ 5� C G r« T•'4 r. G'p. N Zo IL a P' N'14 v{!r4 N 1 _ it '7; •,. +o ,'6�S u. .4. y4 Ewa . 4f, , E '^> �u py 37 w w a u if, `�� a����. tL Q�.. q C ME yy.. .1D l-S C Cg_ y a CUM µGu d�Ny p a %a 6y' '. e»I. E. N' yzn 'R7 qay U L w.'p NQ y p ii �, « c G �.0 ^ LL4 �•,wL. ice+- c 81d �" o a -m-S a ��-�°•.at a$' ��u g �� �_�a•o`'yg3•� as »� .uev' ,gym a � a �» l7 O � W a( Cd wW` Q V~A OIWw h� c 'R .t'.,".y"'. a L cau r,og+ hy. i S s, fiz au !...��s #.' +� u r°.L'u a R Kam u tit FtgA. .�Y• ��� iV Ai .p L,� .r '��w «��Y g.p. �M aytl� +ilp may _C! � K L4.M4 aa�yO, y��t�Rp G�1 ;4ow . � �is G~4 a+s■C' a.y4.46R� �',�p3 xN Q. b ?a p K LL KIE sr Ay, Cty .�N 0.~� N'ti'� P ill sit gl o,Co� xy Ql8is70 u3iw �� a 'j5``S' auLc� r zt�.r W -. 4c «'�`w at L'y�`t.Nil e'TT-'pyq� yy ss£' w wasc u Y wge atnu wmtu,�i +tam` w u'i e•: a.• 8 d w o V Y p Mn Ach qz dmur I `c c�00` El ota"S c a9 r$^ '�. �» w Lai Lum✓ A.,w a it a Y �.rJa wwi za ufal dy o a =r «•u _rf 4 v s 4 ti YC Y. �a .lay�� y14 8.. V p yam. Y C �.� L, i�.' • >f �a�,Q '+`L+ a.0y1 O. C i^q��, e`f. V Y ` `Moy 9QFV4W6tC M ✓„L� V E�i n� Map � �`ty gg V �pO� • y u N✓ M y �.yy �...a �■ ' CV w:CQC. NQ.W! Vp p!`^Rt 4�aa1� iYC. yi q��Ei� S�p q� ,•C.OY �C ��AL COy� �� �y��� a��Y p NA p� iu+n�`"tl Sti.M N�•, tiv L vf4 a V a ,M Y•^aYy. N.a. �C«' pC C!»;C ;°4.r ��■ ^ `+s a��p °W0 O_ rrVY Or^+`C C81♦O��N: 6_� O��S� p� i Ciy ♦a�. `•gigU9}6 pe.N.^1 NY�r • 4 �= OL.NwM �a Bp. I�r O.J Li� 2CY.0 �Mii Y � K RESOLUTION NO. A RESO'.UTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA-PLANNING COMMISSIONr APPRuVING VARIANCE NO. 89-09. A. REQUEST TO ALLOW LANDSCAPING AS A METHOD OF SCREEN. G AN OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA WITHIN A SOUTHERN 'CALIFORNIA, SDISON RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM A REGIONAL TRAIL ON THE SOUTH TIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF, AND ADJACENT TO, THE DEVORE FREEWAY, Ii,t THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRIfT (SUBAREA 15) OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, AND -.AKING'FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOt - APN: 229-I21-18 A. Recitals. (i) AMPAC, Inc_ has -filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No. 89-09 as described in the title of this Resolution. nnreinafter .n this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to "the, application", (ii) On August 9, 1989, the kIanniny Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on tie application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determinEd and resolved by the Pla m•ing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals. Part A. of this Resolution are true and carrect. j 2. Based upon s Sstantial evidence presented to t.iis Commission during the above-referenced public Fearing ash August 9, I9d9,,, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property loczted on the south side of Arrow Route, east: of the Devore Freeway with a street frontage of approximately 650 feet and lot depth of 1,200 feet and is presently unimproved; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a freeway and varont, to property to the south of that -site consists of vacant land, the property to the east is a manufacturing and storage facility, and the property to the west is a flood control channel; and r (c) Southern California Edison will not accept construction of permanent screen walls; however, landscaping has been deemed consistent with their requirements; and COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: VA 89-09' - AMPAC August 9, 1989 Page 2 (d) Landscaping will provide a more aesthetic trail environment than a masonry wall over 2,000 feet long. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence 'pr.�sented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That because the Regional Trail along the Day Creek Flood Control Channel adjacent to the outdoor storage area is not completed, and landscaping will be planted and able to mature prior to Regional Trail improvements, there are exceptional or extraerdinarry circumstances or cnJ itions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that d,. 'not apply generally to other propertles in the same zone. (c) That landscaping is an accepted means of screening other outdoor storage areas from�•putlic rights-of-ways (d) That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. (e) That the granting` of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurid-s to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and concluFions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application. S. The Secretary to this Commission :shall-_certify to the .adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF NE CITY-OF RANCFpO CUCX40NGA f BY: Larry T. iNiFf, Chairman ATTEST: Brad B0 ler, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUYION NO. RE: ,VA $9-09 - AMPAG August 9, 1989 Page 3 I, Br",_ .,jler, Secretary of the Planning Commission ,of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga,; do- hereby certify that #P foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed; and adoptod by the, Planning. Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at-a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held :+^. :he 9th day of August, 1989, by the following vote-tq: wit, AYES: COMMISSIONERS. NOES COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: ,OMMISSIONERSzAft l I _ a i i 'I I� I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 9, 1989 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Comi�ission FROM:: Brad Buller, City'Planner l BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 89-34 TALBOTT - An appeal of staff's l ecision denying the removal or six (6) mature Eucalyptus trees at 10121 Whispering Forest Drive. APN: 1074-111-02 I. ABSTRACT: The applicant, Tom Talbott, is appealing staffs denial of his rerequest to remove six (6) Eucalyptus Red Gum trees at the southwest corner of his house whiell is under construction. II. BACKGROUND: 'rhe trees are located at the rear of the house being constructed e:y tht� southwest corner of Whispering Forest drive and Alpine Meadow Court. This property is part of Tkst Woods development that is located on the site of a large grolre of l Eucalyptus trees. After the streets within th2 tract were built, the property had 227 trees left intact which were fairly evenly distributed throughout the rota; Subsequently, the previous property owner had illegally removed •159 trees from the lot as shown on Exhibit "A"'.. The court f.1ned the previous .property owner but: did not stipulate replace== The new property Owner, Mr. Talbott, requested a Tree Removal Permit No. 88-42 on July 25, 1988 for the removal of 13 trees in conjunction with grading permits (see Exhibit "All). Staff approved the request on the basis that their removal was necessary to construct improvements on the property. III. ANALYSIS: The applicant is now requesting Tree Removal Permit 89-34 to allow the removal of an additional six. (6) trees located near the southwest corner of the house. The trees in question are approximately 15-20 feet high. The applicant, stated that the reasons for removal are that the final grading of the property will result in approximately 5-6 feet of fill dirt on the tree trunks, as illus:.rated by the applicant on Exhibit "B". The trees are located in a ,natural draipiage swale that traverses the middle of the property from north trj sodth. To create a flat pad for the house, the area in question was graded with fill. ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION 5TAFF REPORT TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 89-34 TALBOTT August 9, 1989 Page 2 Adftk The City has placed a high priority on preserving mature trees in the community, and in particular within this tract. The City's Tree Preservation Ordinance recognizes the importance of trees to the City's character_ The Ordinance establishes the following criteria for evaluatf; �i, requests to removetrees: A. The condition of the trees with respect to disease, danger of noilapse of all or any, portion of the trees, proximity to an existing structure, or interference with utility services. Staff Comment: ,The trees are approximately 5 to 10 feet away 7 Ro;n`t a o—us e. The trees are healthy, are not in danger of collapse, nor do they interfere with uaility_sE�ovices. B. The necessity to remove a tree in order to construct improvements which allow economic enjoyment of the property. Staff Comment: The trees are in' an area of grading fill approximately 5 To 6 feet?deep above the former natural grade (base ,,of tree trunks). ','the Tree Preservation 'Ordinance ;prohibits more than 18 inches of fill underneath the trees. The cluster of trees .cculd be preserved by constructing a retaining wall to restore natural grade within 3 feet of the tree trunks. However, because of the proximity of a retaining wail to the house, the wall would require special engineering. C. The number of trees existing in the neighborhood; and the effect the removal would have on the established character of the area and the property values. Staff Comment: The propety is located in a grove of Eucalyptus trees; therefore, there are hundreds of trees within the surrounding neighborhood. The removal of these six (6) trees, due to their location at the rear the house,. would not have a significant effect on the„established character of the area. D. Whether or not: the removal Gf the trees is necessary to construct required improvements_ within the public street, right-of-way, within a flood control or utility right-of-way. Staff Comment: The trees are not located within, the public right-of-way, flood control or utility right-of-way. E. Whether or not the tree could be preserved by"pruning- and ' proper maintenance or relocation rather than removal. _ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RE�1111` TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 89-34 MBOTT August h, 1989 Page 3 Staff Comment If a retaining wall is not const-dcted to prevent fill over the tree trunks, it is7doubtf;4 that the trees would survive wthout special 'watering rasures, The fill itself does,not harm the trees.;.hoW,ever,,'tt:r fiil would prevent water from reaching the root A special deep watering device could be installed, such as a perforated pipe and drip or bubbler irrigation. Pruning and proper maintenance would not compensate for the harmful effects of the fill. Under the Tree preservation Ordinance, relocation on the lot would be,the preferred alternative to replacement; however, it is not,,,recommended in this case because Eucalyptus trees do not relocate well and probably would not survive, F, Whether or not such traes constitute a significant natural resource of the City. Staff Comments; The trees are part of a larger grove that is identified by- the City's General Plan and the ,'ree Preservation Ordinance as a e Inificant natural resource (see comment below)'. G. Whether or not such trees are required to be preserved by any specific plan, community plan, condition of approval, or designation as historic landmark Staff Comment: The trees were intended to be preserved ►,.,^.^ever possible as an environmental mitigation for this tract.. The conditions of approval for the tract required that CC&R"s be developed to preserve existing' trees. IV. OPTIONS: Under the provisions of the TrEz Preservation Ordinance,; the Planning Commission has the follgwing options: 1. Require the trees tobe preserved (deny appeal), or 2. Conditionali'y approve the tree removal (uphold appeal). If removal is allowed, t`le Tree Preservation Ordinance would require replacement. If rem.-ived, staff would recommend replacement planting with six (6) Eucalyptus Red Gum, 5-gallon size, to provide the hardiest growth potential, subject to approval of a planting plan by the City Planner. As required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance, notices ofs,,,the - proposed tree removal were seat to surrounding property owners* No responses, either for or against, have been received, F" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 89.34 TALBOTT August 9, 1r:,89 Page 4 V, RECOMMENDATION: Staff reconvends'that the Piafining Commission reviewand consid6iF the appeal request and prgjvide appropriate direction. If the�ipianning Commission,determinq� that removal is consistent :wi.th tf(e ntent' of"the Tree Preserl%'ation Ordinance, then the City Planner .should be dire.-ted to"grunt a conditional Tree Removal Permit,, subject to replacement planting. If the Planning Commission. determines that the removal is contrary to the Ordinance, they should direct staff" to "'ea re a Resolution of Denial with findings-, for adoption at the next meeting. Resp a .y s ted ra 8u City _ nner ,f 80,DC:sp Attachments: Appeal Letter Exhibit "A" Tree Plotting Map Awl I Exhibit "8" - Grading Section Exhibit "C Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Letter Denying Tree Removal Permit qP 5—Li JUL 17 Joly 17.19t§�? City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning, commission Cirn r,*.L-1 Sanchez Deal- Me. Sanchez, I would like to meet with members of taut Planning Commission to discuss the denial of a tree removal Permit for my property at 10121 Whispering Forest L"'�.. Mr. Ran Colman is the planner: that`has .denied my prd�,.asal and- T -Peal that with a personal interview I might be abl to explain my reasons far, the request. This propertyr was previously owned by 1'tr Phillip Holcomb and it has become evident to the that it is still a proaerty of contention with some of our 'city officials. It is my intention to make this Property fit in with the existing j properties in the neighborhood. 1 am looking forward to meeting out- Planning commission members. fere r. Tom Talbott j 1696 Oakmont DR. E utwland, ca 91786 ,. 149-002 I, I o aoo oa ® a 0 6� Al+fi AMIs A!AAA • �► t 4 VE 000 qq ® -a 0 * aa-ao Soo 'a Ael { �► Ws , 0 i► 63 AF 000 *Ads 0 00 1* Q � 1 ter** o Q! $ e r � q k y O 00 O O U. tl u U • G �� C7 , 1 t t 0 0000 ' ° _ .. d i it � s t � d Ll N � '' O ��+� w� ��e .. / � �, �..� ! •�, '*RJ _ • �ems' I N� `�r•�� '��� a ,ji. r �' .� arc _ �k`�H�,��� �• '� `'' � ,t 'y„ TT- 1 rar K 1 0 4 iG ,ts l 0 w .:. n Ayi;rlr.=..-�_ ram.. .....,t. '' ,.r .]`YV�•i.o!+.'r +� Yl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMUNGA Cost O(Rca Sax W7,Rancho.Cuc monp.CaUfamLa 91M,(714)959•1851 - V July 11, 1989 Re. Tom Talbot 10121 Whispering Forest Drive Rancho, Cucamonga 91701 Dear Mr. Talbot: The Planning Division has-denied your application for the removal or six (6) Eucalyptus Camal7dulensis (Red Gum) from your property to widen the building pad. Staff has reviewed the proposal and determined that tho,subject trees are "Heritace Trees" as defined in the Tree Preser: :_r on Ordinance (No. 276), Section 19.08.303 of the HUnicipal Code. Based on this review, the following flndingrtave been made; 1. The -t-ees are locrtad in an area proposed for fill; ho*ever, could be preserved by constructing retaining walls. 2. A significant number of trees were previously reeaoved from this site. Therefore, staff has denied your request. This decision becomes effective following a ten (10) day appeal period beginning with the date of this letter. Appeals shall be filed with the Secretary of the Planning Ccamission, in writing, together with the a6Z.00 appeal fee. If you should have any questions, please call Vince Bertoni at (714) 989-1861. Sincerely, COMMU dELOP EPARTMENT P 4G 0 VISI Dan oleman v Principal Planner Q r DC:YB.sp 1 tG.�n1.u+nlra CFrY Of RANCHO CUCAMONG;A Post Off-Dxeat..w--baca=.moag..c.sa9do,91 ,Vt,4y9M%&St We*of t6o mayor Dennis L. Stout August 2, 1989 Mr. Tom Talbott 1696 Oakmont Drive Upland, CA 91786 SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 89-34 10121 WHISPERING FOREST DRIVE Dear Mr. Talbott: Thank you for your letter of July 19 concerning the denial of your, request for a Troe Removal Permit. As a property owner within: The Woods, you can appreciate the unique setting the Euc&7;yptus grove creates and the City's desire to protect that environment.., One of the hallmarks of our system is the ability of our residents to appeal an adverse ruling such as this to a citizen"s "Ission of homeowners like yourself, The Planning Commission is scheduled to review your appeal at their next agenda on August 9, 1989. The Commission will consider the arguments raised by your letter for allow%9 the trees to be removed. having the support of the neighborhood for your request is certainly in your favor. Any additional information or arguments that you may have for the `Planning Commission to consider may be forwarded to Brad Buller, City Planner. I apologize for the delay in. processing your permit request. The Planning Division is presently dealing with an overwhelming workload. Again, I am sorry for any inconvenience caused by this 1'elay. I am also forwarding your letter to the Planning Commission so that they may Qcolder your input prior to their meeting. ely, �;nw Den"L. ut mayor cc: Brad Buller Planning Commission DLStsp sa 4A -6 Mayor Dennis 5tPlAt c /"- City of Rancho C6camonaa aaseline Road Original Poor t t=_:rchra i ucamnnc)a, r:r3 ;'?i 7Cr u [Pi ?dear Mayor Stout: This letter is pursuant to our conversation on Satur•dav >?irD.° 15 regarding the denial of a tree removal permit fcr my residence at 10121 Whisperinci For•esi, Drive. I feel the decision to deny the tree removal is arbitrary and not at all reasonable. On May 26, 1999 I submitted a Tree removal Permit application to our planning department:. I knew that letters had to be written to the residents of the area and since I had planned to start my final grading around July ist I wanted to finish th4 process in plonty of t1me. I would ask the neighbors from time to time if` hey h4d received their letters regarding this matter. P,ach time the answer was nu. I dropped by Planning a couple of tim=s to as[r about my Permit, Each time I was advised that the le>tter% were to be sent out soon, On June 21st a letter was sen•v to the resident--- (25 dads a4ter I had applied). During the time I was waiting fcW our cit'r planning penmll* to do their part I t�}.ked to every reside.it that was either ad.iacer.`, tc my property or across the street from my Proper`C V. I brought them to my house and showed them what I ,. wanted 'io do and why. Without exception each thought what I wanted �o do made since and had no objection to it, Mr. Vince gertoni was the planner t'iat I had communicated with and filed my request with. I explained the problem to him and I brought him pictures so that he could visualize the problem. On Thursday, ,July 6th I talked to Mr. Bertt c and he stated that he had .visited the property and that he would recommend that a free Removal permit be granted, but he could not sign the pe::mit. He said that Dan Coleman had to sign. I asked Mr. Bertoni if he would see, if Mr. Coleman could re.,iew his recommendations and possibly s}yrr so that I could finally grade my lot. When he returned 4i-em talkinc to Mr. Coleman he stated that Mr. Coleman was not signing permits this day, and if I returned tomorrow he would have an answer for me. I returned the next day, as instructed, to be told that Mr. Coleman had decided to take a vacation day and there was no one i;i planning that day Coat could approve his recommendation 4 i p`' r g hai Poor s ' Quality Mr. Coleman ruled vn -Tmly 11, Vi851 that the trey in question must remain in place and that I Trust build a retaining wall to Protect them. He sighted that too many trees had been removed -frpm'that lot already. Mr. Mayor, I do not want a retd)ining wall, that will havd to be specially engineer ,d, four feet -from my house and 'three •feet from my patio. This wall will, be very costly. unsightly, and dangerous due to the pro �•ity to the structure. As far as the dumber of trees already removed from the site. 1 had nothing to do wit) that and I was assura;o by planning prior to p"archa'sin4, the prcpert,,'t that the city was; not emotionally ii`p the property ani: hat we would start f,vam square one when' it came `�o to deveiop.ing the site to meet my needs. A point you might be interested in, .Mr. MAyior•. When i mentioned that Mr. Coleman had arbf r;arily turned .down my request several cif Vie neighbors ,s:.,Ated that they.lad stopped dealing with the planning :`rpartment because of Mr. Coleman and the -Fact that is -rxbitrary and not reasonable, Er.closed a"e copies of my request and the correspondence from Mr.. Bartoni and Mr. Coleman. 1 would apprecie-te any help that yom might give: to me. I , feel that it is vsry;,"pessary that our city employees are respected and Lttilize ly the members of our community, For now, at least for some-j Ieopl.e in "The Moods", the planning dept. will be cireumvei"'-d when at all possible. Sinc , Tom Talbott 1696 Oakmart Drive Upland, CA 917e6 (714) 149-002S Urge CITY OF RAjNFVO CSC r i.=.:Cif' JUL 2 G 1889 lid 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUEii&ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 9, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning ommission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: ETFF`',ND+A SCHOOL DXSTRICT'S REOUES -Tp A.DPO'1N PROPOSED ACCESS 7'- ]ii"yO 179 I. BACKGROUND: This matter was initially heard at the Planning omm ss on meeting of July 11, 1989. At that mceting, i was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the greenbelt paseo remain open to the Caryn Elementary Sch:oi site. Hwever, the Commisse'an also indicated their wil)irgness to meet on this issue again if the School District wished_ On July 20, 1989, stuff received a memorandum from the Etiwanda School District. Board of Trustees dated July 18, 1989 regarding the greenbelt paseo connection to the CaryR Elementary School: The Etiwanda School District requests that the.Planniag Commission reconsider their action of July 12 and consider thn concerns outlined in their lettar of July 18 regarding this matter (see Exhibit "A") II. RECOMIMENAATION Staff rec vends that the Planning Commission cons-der vale—ica ditional infor iation submitted and the request of the Etiwanda School District'regarding the abandonment and blockage of the access to the greenbelt paseo from the Caryn. Elementary School and either 11 determine the request to be appropriate and direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Ca,ryn Community Plan, or 2) determine tAat adcess from the greenbelt paseo to the school is an appropriate feature_to the development of the Caryn Comtmunity Plan and direct staff I,.' work further with the Etiwanda School District on alternativ, that will maintain the access, but limit thr ,te and possibly',;ttoe of access availability, e tful s ad er Ci an 'r BS:ko , Attachments Exhibit "A" - July la, 1989 Memoranda"i from Etiwanda School District Board of Trustees ExhV;it "B" July 12, 1989 Pla.,nIng Ccnmission Staff Report With Attachments Exhibit "C" July 12, 1989 Planning Cc.imission Minutes ITEM h ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT ���E����s 5459 Cwt Awre n . P.O. em 24C .— t Ctivsrds Csliferels 91739 NA" Kow (714) 899-2451 t OMW MEW JUL 2Q US TO: Rancho Cucamonga City Planning Commission FROM: Board of Trustees Etiwanda School District RE: Trailway Leading to the Caryn Elementary School DATE: July 18, 1989 #115 We are ery concerned about that part of the Caryn master plan which leads a trailway from the cul-de-sac notch of our school down to the north end of our playground. The primary concerns are twofnld, and tney are as follows 1. Last winner, given though it was a relatively light rainfai year, we experienced serious erosiin problems on the hillside 0.1(* stretches from the opening down to the playground level. To this day, we have been unable to promote any ground cover which is both attractive and protective of the hillsi4e. Until some type of run-off control could be installed by the Oty, we could not consider allowing a trailway to come to that opening, because it would merely enhance the flow of water. '. Before initial construction of the school, the city required us to lower the elevation of the eastern half of a very small school site, and an extremely steep hill was created just at the opening of the proposed city trailway. We ate extremely sensitive to the passage of bicycle;, and possibly skateboards, coming off the sidewalk and tumbling down a steep enbankment'crzating a potentially libelous situation for the district, in addition, the district this summer is adding feve relocatable classroom, some of which will be in close proximity to the aforementioned hillside. We think the temptation of children standing at the top of the hillside looking down upon the rooftops of classrooms Bight be an invitation for vandalism. Unless there is some way the ci :y can mitigate the potential safety hazards as well as the opportunities for vandalism, this board will not cont`der the completion of the trailway. We are not suggesting thikt this is an impossible problem, and it is one that r„ight have a solution which we are willing to discar ,. However, if the plan is merely to lead tf_ trailway to the edge of the district property; and then have the school district worry about apy consequences, we will have no alternative but to fence the opening completely in some manner. ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT. r DATE: July 12, 1989 I TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: ETIWANDA SCHOOL OISTkICT'S RE VEST TO ABANDON PROPOSED ACCESS I B WEN FROM A N ELEMENTARY L AN THE GREENBELT PASEU I. BACKGROUND: On June 9, 1989, staff received a letter--=;om Etiwanda School Di strict Superintendent, Carlton Lightfoot, requesting that the proposed pathway approach to the Caryn. Elementary School site be abandoned for reasons outlined in his letter of June 8 attached (see Exhibit "A"). The Caryn Planned Coninunity know as "Vintage Highlands" is nearing completion. The community is designed to be °centered on a system of recrational open space. This open space system consists of a series t.,' greenbelts which are connected to each cul-de-sac street. Tnese greenbelts or "paseos" tie individual neighborhoods together and provide access to recreational opportunities. The greenbelts are also intended to provide a safe route for school children to reach the elementary school. This greenbelt concept is central to the land plan for the community as explained in the Community Plan excerpts attached (see Exhibit HBO). Rack in March of 1989 following a discussion of the City Council regarding another aspect of the greenbelt paseos, staff was informed of the potential interest of the School Dist-ict. to close off this school access. Staff met with Mr. Lightfoot on the Caryn Elementary School site and discussed several options regarding the termination of the greenbelt paseo that would not preclude passage Y� y from the north into the school property, but that would limit the type of traffic to pedestrian traffic only. The developers of the Vintage Highland project are now in the process of completing their project and have been requester by the School District to block off the access to the school, Staff Could not asue the permits for closing off that access in that, it was staff's opinion that closure would be inconsistent with the Caryn Community Plan and to close it off would require an amendment to the Caryn Community Plan, which r:ould require plaRaing Comsissimv action. 1 �XffI�3iT' 4L N�rJ i t MANNING WYNISSION STAFF REPORT RE. ETIWANOA SCHOOL DISTRICT Jbly 12, 1989 Page 2 II. RECOMMENDATION.'-' Staff recommends that the Planning Commission ,consider tie re uest of the Etiwanda Schoc,1 District to ohandon and block the. access to the greenbelt paseor from their 'school and either 1) determine the request to be appropriate and direct staff to prepare- an amendment to the Caryn Community Pl-an, or 2) determine that access from the greenbelt pas iAo the school is an important feature to the developfnent of th6'Ca.•yn Community Plan and direct staff to work furth6r with the 'Etiwanda School District on alternatives that Mill maintain the access; but limit tha type and possibly time of access availability. . Res lly tted Bra le i a City lanner BB.ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Carlton Lightfoot of lone 8, 1989 Exhibit "B" Excerpts from the-Car�tn. Community Plan Alk Text 1 i' *School rktr P.O.BOX448,ftivranda,California 91739 (714)899-2454 June 8 1989 Mr. Brad fuller, Citv Planner Department of Planning City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 "C" Baseline Road " P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Brad, d I believe it would be to the mutual benefit of all concern d if the proposed pathway approach to the elevated northern portion of the Caryn School site was abandoned. Because of the steepness of the hillside, coupled with the fact that the district plans to place numerous relocatables along the bottom part of that hill, I believe it would create an extremely dangerous, and. posnlbly libelous, condition for both the city and the district. Ile would far prefer to have the gully filled in and the block wall continued across the space where it is now abi6ent. Incidentally, an informal canvas of the residents who are imm. diately adjacent to the gully indicate:A., unanimous desire to have that area eliminated. If any further .clarification is needed, please feel free to call aid we can discuss the situation in greater detril Sincerely Carleton P. Lightfcot Superintendent CPL:rg i Hoard of Truatees ' R G.(Jerry) 8redlau Gary R,Collins David W Long C`arl+rton P Ltghtfoot }�' p-e-r r Marshall b�Pruitt Sap,4inlendent t S /, -Cecilia Soiorto an �� � �r�t ?,'�` WOW SEMOOMMONOM Vintage Highlands City o Rancho Cucamongap California J I i For: Caner+ Company Kaufman arJ Broad, incs� Marlborough Development Corporation i By. Land/Plan/Design Group JUNE 1986 � B. RRQjE:C-MSCRIPTION The,project site contains approximately 244 acres of alluvial wash,gently sloping at approxirrictely 4 1/2%, located at the�base of the San Gabriel Moun!ain footFiilIs. Its sitrafe-d In the City of Rancho Cucamonga and north of the pl arned ,community of Victoria, The site is defined by the propos d Foothill Freeway to O south,the extension of rVlilliken Avenue to the west,the extension of, Banyan Avenue to tht north,and the extension of R6f.hester Avenue-to the east. The:prnpo.-ed Planned Community ,(P.C.)is a single4ornHy residential community,containing * approximately 940,d°wellings at buildout of the current proposed ptitn TM®,immunity's special j identity is;q eystem of open space that 1 ea'the community together. The backbone of this ,pen space network is the parkway corridor. it links the north-south pedestrian greenbelts and the 1el emebtary school;it conwr zts the community to major north-south arterials;and to" possible future -commeretel center(s). s All homes we op cul-de-sacs or clo'#ed loop streets which connect io controlled occesv=llector loop streets. These in turn lead to the commu;;ty parkway rc;6d. The art6rial roads abuttina thf;'P.C.have been sized to oecomodate possibiP future*development to the;no.th of the P.C. To the south of this project,.-, the right-of-Kay for the Foothill Freeway is preserved,- All streets will be dedicated public streets. Where appropriate-`ha.;_will be maintained, along with the parks and „by`"an assessment district. Phase I is plonred for single-C,-roily detached homes. North of the project parkway 5,500 to I 1;000 square foot tots are planned,and south of th»park\'Vay4,000 to 10,000 square foot lots are planned. Kaufman & Broad, Inc. and Marlborough Development Corporation, the two builders"; for vhe sib, will utilize both lot sizes. This arrangement should produce - approximately sixteen different basic louse designs cnd fifty or more different exterior designs,.in difTerent color schemes. Exhlbit 4 an theL fallowing page is the proposed!and use plan. ,r IK $ II. LAND USE A. RELATIONSHIP TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN The original land use plan was approved in accordance with the County of San Bernardino West"Val'ay Foothills Community Plan. Upon annexation to the City of Rancho Cucamr°iga, slight modifications occurred. The current plan identified in the text and exhibits is consistent with the CSty of Rancho t Cucamonga'a,General Plan and has been approved by ihe;City Council. This proposed development is a community of single-family homes, compatible with Victoria, a planned residential community immediately south of th3 project site. ' r _ Each home within this proposed project is on a. cul»de-sac which opens u onto an open space or greenbelt system. Evk'y street/sidewalk system connects to a tiaf network, Each sub-neighborhood, as defined by an interior loop street, focuses upon ;a part of the open space system. The park-like character of the AOL project is suppdrted at the neighborhood level by a street tree heirarchy for local streets, ;- loop streets, parkway,=regional collectors, trails.-and community park. The common theme for this community is. the open space system which provides an overall focus and a, sens�_, of identity. This project utilizes the road standards of Victa..ia and Rancho Cucamonga to extend` i.. _ the feeling of that community. The character of this'proposed P-.C. is-based. upon the idea of an integrated open space system similar to the planned community of Victoria. g Like Victoria, the proposed P.C. uses a ! network of open space.to link the community -• ¢ i to the neighborhood park, the commercial center and to regional; open space and transportatign corridors. Central to this open space system is the parkway which �. structurally 'integrates the residential development with the neighborhood park, via street trees, treats, and park spaces. �iri:.• �i1 ri1 — ��Ilx oily n��sv►� a� �ullyd fin'ii►y , - �fi` ..-- WIN ��M j'�,.����; ••r ®llti. _. ®matt 'I�"''�t�:, ipt�♦�+ ��A� ► emu• lux or ulflux HIM IIf AIAII► 'r1A/ .., itrrv� ���r ��riil' r - • �► � rlt��N�ot�► a111 111it11k� :� 1liAf1! �` 'i ®IIIA 5 s NA 1 EXHIBIT 16 `i LANDSCAPE.ILLUSTRATIVE t' Vt. GOMMUNITI ESIG.M The P-C. is designed to be compatible with the plan- ned community of Victoria,which is a locent td the south.-Thee P.C. focuses on an open space system which ties together the whale community through a network of trails and park space. The open space sys- tem provides a sense of identi`' or the community and acreess to communities on4'r'egional recreation. The landscape palette is designed to be compatible with tb�landscape character of established communi- ties like i=tiwando and with Victoria.; As the site slopes to,the south at 4%±,an attempt has been made to keep all the roads at grade. Where graded slopes occur betweeat'lots,and in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucanongalcore will be taken f'i reduce runoff ' and erosion. The tee and crest of any',yape over 5 feet in vertical height will be rounded and designed in proportion to the total height of t!:e slope. Prior to the plocei lent of fill all slopes greater than 5 feet wall be watered and wheel rolled. All si.3pes greater than 5' will be hydroseeded and irrigated. The road--}ystem within the P.C. helps to both defin neighborhoods and to tie together the whole comrnun Ity. The loop streets delineate neighborhoods. Within each neighborhood,a series of cul-de�soc streets pro. 'vides residents access to their homes to the open space and park system. The parkway widens ov, whenever c loop street.intersects,to provide a-small park space as a visual terminus. Thus,the parkway ties together all the neighborhoods and the park as it flows through the community« The character of the; P.C.,rand unity of the neighborhoods will b' achieved through the use of plant me erials. A -��a Milliken and Rochester entrance to the community a low slumped block entry sign onr,omi -:3 the name of the community to residents and visitors. Aloe ;t'Ail.iken,BatiyoS- `i Rochester Avenues and th ,.Fb6f hill Freeway, .lecor ative slumped blockwall of the some character cis the entry signs,will buffer rWsse,provide privacy,and identify the community. Wooden fences will provide privacy for homeowners along the parlc�fay,loop streets,and trails. See Exhibit 17 for entry sign and pezimeter wall ^haracter.., S i -47- `� 11 _ s4k f VII.`.i CQNSERY non,AWJ', iw sP'ACIw A. PRESERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES The San Gabriel mountslns are characterized Ely a variety of natural resources. The complex hill and canyon tandforms which supply the scenic backdrop to the voi ley floor also provide the natural habitat for witdcif*, 7 and the watershed for ground water recharge. Muds of the scenic value of the regicnel p1prining areo today is attributed to its natural features. Oevelopmeat impacts will be minimpied by proper planning and management. Attenti d:iwltl be given to proper grading practices,to em1eeve topsoil and,pre. vent erosion. Contour grading techniques will b' util- ized to blend with the existing natural terrain and where possible,graded slopes. if approved by�sail engineer,grades may reach a maAmur►t ratio of 1-1/2:1 ratio when used for czmtouring purposes in limited areas. 'io maintain the feeling ca the natural landscapi�und'to „ in:,�grote this project into the adjacent comma jaes, ottc.-ktior will be givers to the use of landscape'.voter- lots ti:#are native and/or drought tolerant,raid which are r7,ml9r to those found in adjoining commimitiesr B. PRODUCTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES_. Within the vim.lty of the planning area, there are two known reserves of high quality aggregate,an essential building material. it is likely that extraction operations will recur some distance , north of the P.C.. However,pTi-Antion of these materials is not economical on.the peofzz site: C. OUTDOOR RECREATION In addition to the regional recreational opportunities which hcve been cescribed in Section IV.,D-(3),Com- munity Facilities-Parks and Open Space,the.:project will provide a pedestrian oriented open space system. (Exhlbits 3, 13,cmd 14). The opw*space systems is based capon a greenbelt cogcept i•'n which project cul-de-socs look onto the greeh�t--O`trciils;, These greenbeits act as a continuous open spate element tying together individual neightsor- , hoods into a coherent comrrunity. These greenbelt ! corridori also provide access north of the site to T ' regional recreational opportunities. This project prc- I Sari Bernardino County,West Valle FoFoo,�hiils , Community Plan,(1983),p,DZ-11. 1 t Mr roiak stated that because the approval from CalTrans would take time, wou fer to tie the completion to Phase.II. IF Commiss r Chitiea stated that seemed a reasonrble request. The Comniss concurred that it be acceptable to tie reconstructio Please II. Mr. Stroink sta he was disappointed because he thought a omise had been worked out i sign Review to only tear up the corner are Commissioner Chitiea ted it had bean discussed as a poss ity. She said it was discussed as a romisa, but the Commission was f g uncumfortable at the time bocaus'A the id tiot have anyone from Engin " g to find out if colored sidew??k world be eptable to CalTrans. She ed she appreciated the develop=..r's problem, she wanted the Bevel t to be as it was designed. Chairman McNiet asked if it wa sonab.e to m ust the corner 'brown and have the rest of the sidewalk gra r if the t . nt going east on Foothill and north on Vineyard enhanced the more. Commission',r alakesley stated there t a break to gray, either at the driveway or at the corner. Mr. Buller stated that",e original nt oloring the sidewalk brown was to make the area look as history authen as possible. He stated that in driving by, the color of the elk would he that prominent. Mr. Stroink suggested that landscape architec et with Planning staff and see if there were a options. If they fel -, y had a 'setter idea, they would return to t issiorr. He stated = oz a ry, they would tear up the s`dewalk and c to brown. Chairman McNiel d that he could return to tl e 4„mmis if he had a superior alter e. Mr. Buller d if the option should return to 'the full Cemmissi Chair cdiel stated any new options shoull-I be considered by full Co uh, COMMISSION BUSINESS N. ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REQUEST TO ABANDON PROPMED ACCESS BETWEEN THE "J Planning Commission Minutes -22 July 12, 1989 Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that Carlton Lightfoot, Superintendent for the Etiwanda School District, indicated he had walked the site with two of his board members and they felt there were significant drainage and, s:VF,;y issues with regard to the grading. He said they did not wish to mc:t with ttie Commission until he and Mr. Lightfoot had an opportunity to fu0-her walk ten_ site., He said the Caryn Planned Community originally called for paseos to terminate at a pzra site. However, duri_rg the ,process of �;;inexation and _negotiations with. the School B tr'ict, the-park'sive became the school. He said the development and schools have proceeded and the paseo is now under^ construction. The ,idTmalx is planned to terminate as, the northern school boundary. It was assumed when the dark was designed, the walkway would carry on through the park and terminate at a public street. However, with the school, it terminatss a. a lawn area, with a significant embankm?Rt with a downgrade to a hard court area whot;e the school plans to sit: portable units. Or. Ujhtfoot has indicated he believes the paseo termination would be an attractive nuisance," He stated ,that when he previously walked the site with Mr. Lightfoot, he suggested the'} fence off the portion that would allow direct pedestrian access to the sw h and east and divert there to a field to the southwest, which is more crtiwi,6y aligned in grading to t*t access point on the paseo. He stated the on <a previous cul,-de-sac issue in the Caryn Planned Community, the City Council had gone on record stating they supnortee the Commission that cu`-de-sacs should-'remain open, but they would not make any final decisions on iosures until the,,.-entire CAryn. Plania_d Community has been built and occupied to deterRine the feeling; of the residents. He said the School District has the right ts, $1 as they wish on their own property, so they may place a fence pK School District property which would totally block access, Commissioner Chitiea reiterated tier support of the pa,eo system as it was designed throughout , e City. She felt to close off the safe means of ingress aH egress to this school would probably be opposed by the residents. She felt the City should niako every effort possible to provide access and the resideits. wculd be upset with the school if they should block it off. She stated the school w`zre site teaches is fenced but has a gate which rema?ns open oa'the weekend for pedestrian access to the playgrounr, and it-prcA des an attractive area for penople to use on the weekends and very little vandalism is experienced. Coamissinner Weinberger felt wnat if sidewalks were not in yet, it was a wa3te to put them in if the sch:,oT was geinq to block 14, off. Commissioner Chitiea felt if the sidewalk were iiatalled art ,bu school block. it off, then the school is the one doing the blocking; whereas; 3f it is not installed, Cher, the City would be seen as blocking off the access. Commissioner Sl'akesley wanted the passo left oPen. CommissionerWeinberger agreed it should be left open, Mr. Buller stated that closure could create a potential_nuisance arsa between properties. Planning Commission Ainutes =23- July'1.2, Y989 6 R -1' { It was the consensus of the Ceircission (4�0-i that the paseo remaiix aper�; The Commission-i�idicated their willingness to gjfi.} on this issue again if the School District wished to meet. ; Chairman McNiel felt the Schad! District s`riulbj have sent a representative4o this evening's meeting, as the item had been continued from a previods-' meeting,. 0 TION OF ME:;BER TO SERVE ON THE CENTRAL PARK LIBRARY0 Y DE _ E - �— _LL It was the cd of the Commission that Betty W er wo4ld be the delegate and Suzan "tlea would bp,, the alternate, PULIC COMMENTS There were no further p:blic co Motion: Mov lakesley seconded b, Chitiea, unani carr16d, to adjourn. 1'L^ Planning Commission Adjourned to a'July 20, 1984 ,r�or t l Respectfully submitteo, } Brad Bullor ] Secretary I Plar-,ing Commission this- , {' d July I2, 1989 r - CITY-OF RANCHO CUCAITAONGA Ir STAFF REPORT DATE: August 2, 1989 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM, Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, Planner Alan Warren, Associate Plainer SMELT STATUS OF MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENt - A reviN of res^dential development as it per .� ns to Vie ity's sCnniie family/multi- family housing mix. Y. ABSTRACT/RECO,MMUDATIOPI r,)is report study contains information requested y the City lroun A I related to,the management of gr„4th in 'Rancho Cupomonga. The-sccoVanying study is a small part of a larger Cojn, r review of th!%,issues affet ling residential growth in the community. It is int&led to give tha Council statistical information to help it provide staff with direction in fainulating re-idenitial growth mana,_k aient policies. Council direction is requested. II, BACKGROUND: In May of this year, tfre City Council received fr+ou sstaff"ar,3utline of a_-2 Action rrogrum to study thirteen areas of interest Wzrting the manageti;opnt of growth in the community, one . of the of interest was the evaluation of the present distribution of multi-family zomkna and it was scheduled to be presented to the ^ity Council at mid year. III. DISCUSSIW: The Action Program proposed a study of multi-fatjily aT3use'designattony City-wide which"was to include the follow:rrg: A. Contain an assessment of areas; - already developed, - vacant 'land with previous approvals, f - inventory of vacant land designated for multi-family projects without development approvals. B. Evaluate the d1stributV-)n and balance of singe and multiple family housing at the City's build-out. i The study has been completed in the manner outlined above, using January 1, 1989 for determining existing, approved and vacant uncowitted land. j ITEM I CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE; STATUS OF MULTI-F;AhiILY DEVELOPMENT August 2, 1989 Page 2` IV. ANALYSIS: A review of the numbers (existing units, units on land under development review, and vacant uncommitted land) indicate the following; i, o The City housing ratio for existing, plus approved, projects is I 74% single family (SF) and 26% multi-family (MF). At Wild- cut, the. -atio is expected to be 65% and 35% respectively. This ratio includes the estimated units for the sphera area. Refer to Exhibit "111. These figures ird'i=ate tiiat the City's growth is following a standard pattern of residential development in expanding urban areas. That is, th predom )nce of single family development occurs early in a (ommunit}° ,s growth to be followed by multi- family infill. Soc,',.al and economic forces generally drive this pattern of developm�ht. o Approximately 89r of the residential' land at build-out will be all-icated for SF devel-opmen' leaving about 11% for MF development. Refer to Exhibit 1-2". This statistic reflect the inherent increased unit density on land designated for multi-family development more units on less land. o The housing ratio of those projects currently under review (application submitted, approved, or under construction) is 68% SF and 12% MF. Due to th=amounts of single family and multi- fam, y paned uncommitted lands the ratio of those units yet to be reviewed to build-out is expected to be 49% SF (includes Sphere estimates) and 51% MF. Refer to Exhibit "311, These figures indicate that the residential_ growth pattern is still esseelially towards s;l';gle family, but in the future as more and more single family' land is used up. the residential development will gradually sWitch;more significantly ;;o multi- family. o The majority (60%) of future (nut yet approved) multi-family units will be built in the two large .planned communities of Terra. ;vista and Victoria,,, Refer to Exhibit "4", This figure reflects, again, the standard pattern dingle family ` residential development significantly preceding multi-family. Also, it notes the early efforts of City, planning tc provide a mix of housing types in the planned communities: o Based upon 1980 Federal Census estimates Far persons per household, approximately 22.4% of the build-601 population could be expected to live in multi-family units and-17.6% in single family units. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: STATUS OF MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT August 2, 1t99 Page 3 This is reflective of the predominance of st ;ller rental units in multi-family complexes and a correspondingly lower persons/household than in owner occupied, single family developments, l VI. POLICY OPTIONS: The folI owl nq opt%,it are ,;ggested for the Council 's consideration; �` 1. If the Council believes that the facts pres�\nted mey not be consistent with it's current thinking for resj�,dential growth, the Council should direct staff:ta prepare optigns for amending the General Plan and'/or development: District provisions. More specifically,` if the City Councii believes the current residential mix (74%/26%) or any other ratio is the most desirable at build-out, ,then stair" could formulate the exact number of multi-family,units which would need to be reduced to reach that ratio and'-prepare land use amendments to accomplish the objectives. iwo alternatives which 'immediately come to mind at's as follows:: a. Down zone ,selected properties to lower, density multi- family or s;.ngle fafoily.designations, and/or, b. Reduce the den;fty ranges for all or selected multi- family designations (i.e., reduce 8-14 dwelling units per acre to 8-12, etc.) 2. Refer this matter to the Planning Commission for discussion and return the matter to the City Council with additional input from the Planning Commission. Staff is looking for Council discussion and direction on these or other policy options. Respectfully submitted, Brad Bull r City Planner BB:LH•A4l:kn Attachments: Exhibits "I" - "5 City-Wide Totals (Housing Figures) I — CCF l•v 1. J t.. p�p �i Jt lo co C-4 coM r„Sr val LL cli PAU So cr owl Lu _ + ` ®J O ( @'"Q � c ddi LU <� 4 , ,m w �a C �?s _ i _ J ` i f. O 0 � r ® 0 0 f co Iq r Exhibp� b ui MIS N, LU ®� > � ��0 � } UJ Liz %to co y r tr;• NLC LM toae J cosi rnr,a a°0t 0 d� T �cc cs ' IMLC LUJ2b, N _ z �' f �,. CD P 00 cc a'iva . . .�. U. cc �yqq �ty�1 0/� '0 0 0 z- FUTURE MULTIFAMILY UNI T�q BY OCIMMUNE"t Y TEflRA VISTA 2a 2 30% VICTORIA 3t?3 31% 1NP.. -CIT4' 1€,13 16% �TIVA*,ND Gg17 24% ,Build out Iwal awgurpee density at 75 of the 41lo rswe range. GROMANI sz f� ¢n ZR - IL (' LL43 j}T CIS BR IM CO CD _ II^�� 1L •�. A - \�,! 'iLLJ •� L N. a o t� 7R q ANY m N X O LO p LC) p o r- �n cat ExWb34'S`' -�---- CITY OF RANCHO CWCAMQNCA :.t ,I HTY W �, i Singie Family a Multifamily AoreagesUnit Tabulations ---- CITY OF RANCHO C,UCAMONGA CITE' WIDE TOTA67,S C alnOls attach Malt!-raa3Yy J7eaa34 7«vatc_i nD�.sv a3SCSS4 conaeiaeear. Raft, � t Jaslusry,lost ,aU73 622 side 1.93 (afar.ataaat4t) Under C1t7 revises 0t1i 709 -4434 is "tfi -. --- Totals 33164 1531 12614~ -270 041iral city yac.acri. IY cults M►unij� Hillaids It".(421 74.}4 74-a4s30 - 7st i1L va,rr tow1421 401,33 309-704 73s. 40e .. Lard-4V 211.33 423-146 .101. 433 7s1 T40 L-Madlui(4.4) 3.26 ,13-20 2a 10% a3 M'ddl (4-141 123.28 1Q32-1E06 Ts1 1410 $012 Med.-a194114-241. ` 13.94 194-330 - To% 266 736 301 Totals ta71l91.01 002.1416 122E-23t2 ds a rn (M7)142.66. 1124 3046 ran 1473 10131 7FK, Tetra V19tr, Vsr.aR». as units Low Mad1oa14-6) 14.67 139-277 Masesrrlan count 212 30% 204 74C 242 1144aw16-10 aS.11 $07-1220 Matter 71gv count '$41 aCrt 9a4 7s6 AN Haa-E10411a-01 43.03 s42-1si3 Mutat Plan count 10la 401 it IN a33S 1 H10012a-301 - 49.04- 1094-1344- 'Matter Plan count 11077 Sol, 123d 144 Ix9Y lgtais 137i-34.07 139-377 SaT2-409e ranee SM711o0.49 212 3t39 Matr.vsgn ct JOE 336E a01 .a2 374E 75, Victoria Z"M*d3siU-a) 69.3 27 3410 4a. 474 ad3vu10-l41 140.96 1520-2460 •01 23090 731 2a Medium 1lHh(14-24) 34.1- 7s7-1204 Sot. 1024 IN 1143. 7 n10At24-301 11.16 292 360 .nos 32 734 347 � 7dt43a t07i 46.30 .73+544 2446+4329 eaa0a IM71 206.24 "a 3444 Sea 473 26e9.. 754 <; ` 'j 1. �---- ----- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P �c t 63tata;t9f.10�/1' 134.06 DO-;70 is 40 T5t 9p .Va 941-1329 SOY 9a2 73Y i131 Low12-4t i9l.NI ,. 347 734 so: Is t 642 Low R4d50YU•141 164.t2 1049-2119 50% ISH 71% 1a3o. Nadic3ta-141 241.31 - 1931-3379 s0Y - t44a 74Y I017 7ots19 t591 1230.01 1147-4195 1911-2379 2m0a °t"t 241.37 rt91 loss salt 3r43 4017 70; city sot'iat __._� ._, _.�.._.._ ._w 1111sida.Aaa,1t21 14.44 74-148 IOW 7C 73Y. 111 Saute ;A*.4$ 40-220. -so r5Y 90 Vory LCrttlt(1-31 1004N.00 1040-2124 SOY i191 73Y 1734. 1.. Lowt2-4.1 z0a.r(.9 790-1l90 50% ii4t 73Y Y34t Lowtlrlltls(4-0--1 M-11, 1494-14aa lot 2217 75% l ISN W.dlumja-14j 917.d.'1 4180-90ow SOYA - 7122 - 70.t 4013: M44.•RdyOjlo-241 131.11 .193E-3146 SOY lost 7YY ISIS Ri011(24r301 57.70 f3it-1731 50%739 1350, 1648 , f.. OLt(S)SOSALRP Jtt Total 98 icra at": 20;!>1lA if7 a3R19 _ ':3z41 Oalza(va"At laaa:f% - rwga, d490+4019 13400•hp91 TOTALS WILDOM raa99.. 34171-4143*40000) I30i1-319i4 _ sOtG 40F46+t Fi'7Cl`. 13104 .: 73L .935-W jai '15LIL TOTAL MT!! r4'f{t9.... LOle9-40194 A (9;d1s!``a(4919S-T91941 -s0Y 44440 4.(►9416r+,:+1 1 7osesi 73Y 64410 17241p1 teatime&*for w"St 1 DEER'CREEtt KAHE/ADDRE.5S _ SQ. FOOTAC/P.` -TYP3 PARKING Vacant /017,5 gitnest; Centar gs.1p , Togo's Eatery 1995 Restanrant 19.9s 7900 124 Havant R. Cucamonga Circle A Cleaners 790 Dry Cleaners 3.16 7900 #26A Haven, R.. Cucamonga Travel Agency 972 Travel Agency 3.89 7900 #25 Haven, R. Cucamonga Elite Speri:nwear 2000 Clothing Store 8.00 7900 #25 Haven, R. Cucamonga circle K 3366 Cont-,nience Store 13.46 7900 v23A&D Haven, n. Cucamonga Haven Hills Howling 36025 Howling Allay 200.00 7930 #101 Haven, R. Cucamonga Video Wirld 1845 Video Store 7,38 7930 #101 Haven, R. Cucamonga Dear Creek Bakery 1610 Bakery 6.44 7890 120 Haven, R. Cucamonga Old Time Ice Crezm - 1610 Ice Crean '.rlor 6.44 7892 #19 Haven, R. Cucamonga Decr Creek Vision 1610 Eye cake 8.05 7890 #17 Haven, R. Cucamongm ?few Friend Chinese 1610 Restaurant 16.10 7890 #15/16 Haven R. Cucamonga Norweat Financing 1395 Financial 5.58 7890 413E Haven, R. Cucamonga 30 Ki,lute: 7hoto 1000 -'hota Developing 4.32 7890 013A 'NaveZ, R. Cucamonga Priority Hair De r 2110 Hair 6a4on 27.00 7890 111 Haven, Cucamonga Nail Today 1395 Nail Salon 15.00 7890 911 Haven, R. Iucamonga Barstools Etc. 6800 Fuvniture 13.60 Z890 #9 Haven, R. Cucamonga, Vacant 1910 7.64 Vacant 1610 6.44 Vacant 1610 6.44 Vacant 2785 11.14 Beauty School 5140 Total: ys3.1A Moving Our in Aught Total Jv: lit`le: 496.00 CITY OF 12 ANC HK CUCAMON A TM19: a-e-m t-.;-T l ,7,,;;1�0 HAYSB/AADRESS _ $0. FOOTAGE -TYPE RAPSING Vacant 101751 Fitness. CInter 7S•{Q Togo Is Eatery 1995 Restaurant 19.95 7900 124 Haven, R. Cucamonga Circle A Cleaners 790 Dry Cleaners 3.16 7900 #26A Haven, R. Cucamonga Travel Agency 971 Travel Agency 3.89 ' 7900 #25 Haven, X. Cucamonga Elite Sportcwear 2000 Clothing Store 8.00 1900 #25 Haven, R. Cucamonga Circle K 3366 Convenience Store 13.46 7900 923A&B Haven, R. .0,1calmonga Haven Hills Bowling 35025 fowling Alley 200.00 7930 $101 Haven, R. Cucamonga video world 1845 video Star& 7.,3$ 7930 #101 Haven, R. Cucamonga 1 Dear Creek Bakery 1610 Bakez:y 6.44 7690 #20 Haven, R. Cuoamon?a Ji Old Time Ice Cream 1610 Ice Cream Parlor 6.44 7890 #19 Haven, R. Cucamonga Deer Creek vision 1610 Eye Care 8.115 7890 #17 Hr-Aven, R. Cucamonga JI+ New Friend Chinese 1610 Rastaurant 16.10 7890 41SI16 Haven, R. Cucamonga 1 Norwest Financing 1395 Financial 5,59 7890 4138 Haven,.R. Cucamonga 30 Minute Photo 1080 Photo Developing 0.32 7890 #13A Haven, R. Cucamonga Priority Hair Design 2110 Hair Salon. 27.00 7890 #11 Haven, R. Cuo _nga Nail Today 1395 Nail Solon 15.00 7890 411 Haven, R. oicamonga Barstools Etc. 6800 Furniture 13.60 { 7890 #9 Haven, R. Cucamonga Vacant ; 1910 7.64 Vacant 1610 6.44 i Vacant 1610 6.44 ,l Vacant 2705 11.14 Beauty School S140 Total: `Jj Moving out in August Total)"ailnbla: 490,00 Or ^1DEER CREEIE-T�EN NPS HAMBjADDRESS - SR. FOOTAGE TYPE PARKTA; Vacant fQ� .�} Fitness center Togo's $atery 1995 Restaurant 19.9y 7900 124 Haven, R. Cucamonga Circle A cleaners 790 Dry Cleaners 3.16 7900 126A Havens R. •:..camonga Travel Agency 972 Travel Agency 3 89 7900 125 Haven, R. Cucamonga Elite Sportswear 2000 Clothing Store 8.00 7900 025 Haven, R. Cucamonga Circle X 3366 Convenience Sto':�e 13.46 7900 #23A&B Haven, R. Cucamonga Haven Hills Bowling 3,6025 Bowling Alley 200.00 7930 ¢lol Haven, R. Cucamonga Video World 1845 Video Store 7.38. 7930 1101 Haven, R. Cucamonga Deer Crack Bakery 1610 Bakery 6.44 7890 #20 Haven, R. (tcamonga Old Time Ica Cream 1610 Ice'Creaa Parlor 6.44 7890 #19 Haven, R. Cucamonga Deer Creek Vision 1610 Eye Care 8.05 7890 #17 Haven, R. Cucamonga New Friend Chinese 1610 Restaurant 16.10 7890 #15j16 Haven, R. Cucamonga Horwest Financing 1395 Financial 5.58 7890 1138 Haven, R. Cucamonga 30 Minute Photo 1080 Photo Developing 4.32 7890 $13A Haven, R. Cucamonga Priority Hair Design 2110 Hair Salon 27.00 7890 111 Haven, R. Cucamonga Nail Today 1395 Nail Salon 15.00 7890 #11 Haven, R. Cucamonga Barstools Etc. 6800 Furnit'1re 13.60 7890 19 Haven, R. Cucamonga i Vacant 1910 7.64 Vacant 1610 6.44 Vacant. 1610 6.44 Vacant 2785 11.14 j Beauty School 5140 Total: �lS3•�3 moving out in August Total Available; 496.00 I CITY OF ITEM: 89 -Z-1- A C O CU A ONGA TITLE:`�'"c r. v,-r t...,. 'Er P LANNUNM DIVISION Z-8 EXHIBIT: "!U' SCALE:.._..m:-. r DEER 6REEK''S N NTS ;. } �: NAME/ADDR3SS SQ. FOOTAGE TYPE PARKING p0 JAM Vacant lE? ?S' Fitness center 31D Togo's Eatery 1995 Restaurant 19.95 7900 #24 Havenr R. CncaZ*nga Circle A Cleaners 790 Dry Cleaners 3.16 7900 #26A .Haven, R. Cucamonga Travel Agency 972 Travel Agency, 3.89 7900 #25 Haven, R. Cucamonga Elite Sportswear 7000 Clothing Stars 8.00 7900 #25 maven, R, Cucamonga Circle K 3366 Convenience Store 111.46 7900 #23A&B Haven, R. Cucamonga Haven Hills Howling . 36025 Howling Alley 200.00 7930 #101 Haven, R. Cucamonga Video World 1845 Video Store 7.38 7930 1101 Haven, R. Cucamonga Deer Creek Bakery 1610 Bakery 6.44 7890 J20 Haven, R. Cucamonga Old Time Ice Cream - 1610 Ice Cream Parlor 6.44 7890 119 Haven, R. Cucamonga i Deer Creek vision 1610 Eye Care 8.05 7890 #17 Haven, R. Cucamonga New Friend Chinese 1610 Restaurant 16.10 7890 915/16 Haven, R. Cucamonga Norwest Financing 1395 Financial 5.58 i 7890 #13S Haven, R. Cucamonga. 30 Minute Photo 1080 Photo Developing 4.32 7890 #13A Haven, R. Cucamonga Priority Hair Design 2110 Hair Salcn 27.00 7890 111 Haven, R. Cucamonga Nail Today 1395 Nail Salon 15.00 7890 #11 Haven, R. Cucamonga Barstools Etc. 6300 Furniture 13.60 7890 #9 Haven, R. Cucamonga Vacant 1910 7.64 Vacant 1610 6.44 vacant 1610 6.44 1 Vacant 2785 11.14 Beauty School 5140 Total. YS3.1.4 'Moving Out in August Total Available: 496.00 RANCHO VU ►A11�I NGA TITL�'i:..L�.t�uv+-t~ PLANNING DIVISION Z-8 EXHIBIT: SCALE