Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1989/09/27 - Agenda Packet
C�CAMry�. S CITY CC. c s R.AN 'C[JC;AAI GA rJ 1 GENLKI Fk 1977 WEI)Ni:CD4Y 3EPTEMBER27,,1989 7a00p.m. { r� UON9,PAW GowivlfF'D`3[CuFTTER cIXG CUCAMONGA$CMAF6RNU' b ,%I,,, Ple*e of;Ait M Roli Gall t�armissioner Biaifasl'ey Cantnisaionar McNIei Oxlmiasioner'_Chitiea ' Oomnissioner ThIstoy Commissioner Weinberger �- HL Anrlwn"ments IV. Approval of Id nutes AdJourned Meeting of August 30,;,1t'V-q Adjourned Meriting of Septenber September 13, 1989 Y. Comm Calendar The fog,u)wi►g Gonsdnt Calendar items are expected to be Pout(ne and now-contr=ovarsiai. They will. be acted on by the Commission at one C' time without disewslon. If anyone has concern over any, item, it should be-removed for discusalon. A. DESIGN REVIEW:�.POR TP9T.TIVE TRACT 13A5 STANDARD AC1 I�C The d n review o building evations and detailed site plati for Phases 5A 0,and 10 of ar prr�viously Gountg-apiaroved map consisting of 108 single .family lots on 545.sores-of land ,., no,th of Summit Avenue.,and.east of `llardman.Bullock, Road - APN. 226-082 16,171k 2 j- 'i B. TIME }iXTENSIIC2& FOR DEVELOPMENT RRVIEW 85-42' +- A proposal to eonstr",,t]_JJ apartment units on 9.03 acres ot land in the, lle4Wtn h e idential District, (14:U �! dwelling.units per a-.1e)located nb4h of Bose Ripe Road,550 feet east of Day Craelt Cl� �;cT-.APt°. 2BT-00i-21 scoiated;witiZ the proposal Is Tree Removsl-T�!^l slit 87-67. fi ( yf i ti C. MODIFICATION TO DESIGN REVIEW ItOR TENTATIVE TRACT ;t265�g 2 B ANTON The design review,,,ot' a new building ergyatioinn and revised un,t. milk for,.Phase'12- ol, a preylously approved tract'snap consisting of 135•single t, tllyi 26ts,o67.87 acres of land in the Very Low Resioentiai I)��tKOi9�'1-2-`dwelling urilte per acre}' of the,ttiwanda Specific Plate x rated at the south freoti .i orfor of EttWv Lnda Avenue and 2A Street -..AP,N 225Mt11-38 tlncU39. M VL Public Rearm Jt._ The foIlou�ing items are lrublla hear ings '(a which concerned individuals may voice;their opinion..of the reiateai prj�jeCt. (Please wait to be recognized'by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall Ire limited to 5 minutes per incYtyidual fflP each prajeCt. x D. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 89-04 PEPPPR'S IVlEXIcAN REgTAURAr�•,'` - The review o providing 1i,,�'entertaimnent in conjunction with restaurant use',;i oeated at 974019th Street. E. MODIFICATION' To, CONDITIONAL ;USE PERMIT 88-12 WESTERN PROPERTIES-Proposed various minor revisions to the site plan-ard,.building design of a pri4lously approvedi-171-,acre shopping ceiiter';(Terra Vista Towne Center),that involves such items,as iAjustmant to on-site curb line,combinatfpn of buildings into o`ne,ishif&1g of building•or'ientaticn to provide slew corridor, archik'eet,6ral enhancement for building;edges, ete., for property located;;at the northeast corner of,Haven Avenue and Foothill Bouleveisd in the Community Commere al District of the Terra Vista planned Community-APN't,?1077-421-05,06f and i3. F. ENVf'R 01 MFN'A I ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN » £MENDMENT '89-02E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -'A, . request to amend Sectio Environmental Resoureesi and Public-safe J.,_.alem61 xrf' the-GenerA"Ian ds-tney µ relate to hillside .development and grading:and''will involve revising the definitions of hil si3e from 1096 or;greater tg 8% o2 greater, as well as restricting development.on stopEs Which ate 30%or greater.; G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ' GENERAL PLAN "AMENDMENT 89-021) RANCHO CUCAMOGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY A request to emend the,Land Use B"sment of ,the Goneral Plan from Flood Control I to Civie/Community for 315 acres of land,located on the north sate of Banyan Street,, east of the Deer Creek Channel -APN: 201- 19Y ?� a' y , H. 'ENVIRONMENTAL'. ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AV,EY-MENT 89-05 - RANCHO CUC'AMONGA'" REDEVELOPII!'rNN'Y AGENCY," A request to amend the ` Development Districts Map frdin Flood Control to,: Low Residential-(2-4 .dwelling':..nits per acre):for 3.15 aeres of land; located on the north side of Banyan Street,,east of the Deer Creek Channel.=APN.:.2411L.?a _,. L ENVIRONMENTAL 'ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE', PERMIT 89 HO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT, AGENCY The :development of a fire, station_total ng-11� ,02G ware feet on 3.15 acres'cif land in the E�oo�r 0ontl+o2 75istric't, loc&#ed on the noe!th"side d Banyan Street,east of tTic"Deen.Cr"eek Channel APN: 201-191-24., Associated with ti�is project is c' General ,Plan Amendment ,89<U2D ancC Development,District ,Amendment 89-05.: 3 ENVIRCNMENTAL ASSESSMENT' AND PA.R.CEI MAP 12779 -" RANCHO'-CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY development of 3.15 acres of;Iand into 1 parcel6vithin.the Flood Control Development Distriet;3 ated on"the north side of Banyan' Street,east of Deer Creek Ci y0-APN#'"201 191-24, r!' K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND " CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 59-23 RANCHO GUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The;development of ,a fire station, maintenance -' facility,training"center at'd training tourer totaling 36,328 sxluare' feet on 7.08 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Indlustrial District (Subarea 9) of the:Industrial Area Specific Plan,-located I at the southwest corner of,,,the 'proposed extensions of jersey_ Boulzvard and Milliken Avenue-APWr 229 lli1 B3 " L. ENVIRONMENTAL; ASSESSMEWT AND ,,GENERAL PLAN r: " AMENDMENT NO. 89-02C-FUTURE ESTATE INC -A request to amend the Generai<P,Ian.Land_Use_Ma;.-T'ro�-Offiee to i2 3ium-_... _. Density Residential(81"4 dwelling units per,sere)for.3.556:.:dares' of,Iand located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and -ti Church Street. The City willalso, consider Neighborhood " Commercial and Low Medium,Density Residential as appropriate aliZmAtive designations. APNt 1077-332-26. M. .ENVIRONMEN'1'Ali' ASSESSMENT AND• DEVELOPMENT' DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 89-04 FUTURE ESTATE INC.-A request to amend the7 Development Districts. Map "ti�om"Op" (Offic%Professional) to I'M"(Medium Density 844 dwielling units per acre)for 3.550,acres of land located, I at, southeast,corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street. The Citt!wilt,also, t consider "NC" -(Neighborhood Commercial) and "LM" (Low Medium)as appropriate Alternative distrieti.. APNE' 10, 7 332-26.;, ' a � � 4 y Yam` "fw•` �f —77 1 Yd.. FRLNTATIfJN OF PLANS FdR RANCHO CT7G�MmPIGA HIGH°" 1Jr SCHOUj:,.:dNO:iTIiWEST CQRNER VIC tQRIA PARI LA E ANGAN:? 3iCCHESTER•�C?ra3�3epgrt by Wo�fe�7�agr'Christophee n :5 .y,-. AT3VE1?TISiI3 REf 177�A'1 GNS FC1It'A il3 6 SAI;ES f:El��`ERS f Cap MISAf"?a famess r` C fmmiss t;it mine as t ibe disco� a genera pubYt", to U44 ess the ussed here are those Uhich do no,,� uir6ed�*;appear are tff's.4gend� f X� 'Adjournment' The Pla `ing C'ommisron has adopted A4,ninistt°at(Ve j?pgulations that set an I ,,,m..`¢djourn�t[ent tirrcer X��t8V1i 9 htsyand M f tithe,they,, shall be hard only wA the consent or zhe Co iss�on. , , S. 1 � � I i, k ' i ` RMv>A COLLtOQ � s �� C 3 d AK v! INITY", M 7.7 mm SWIM loot"IRS( Nw w..... IN111WIIN3MIIM1IW �11111�pt1111M �, {.. �j Ggo PART M a � ecitev AM WTO All -71 WARM M� 72>USp - 8 y Q iidYDMoa•Jua.� .fr [ tOMaL iabs �,, 6RTaR18'.iR10RRlTeBi(AK atooRRr, _r��- Cf"C " 's t — CIV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE;: , September 27, -989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Sommission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner ' BY: Beverly Nissene Associate Plan'er. ' SUSJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR,TENTATUE TRACT.13565 STANDARD.PACIFIC nz esign review of builing, elevations— a eta ,ed site :plan -for, P(t'ases -5, - 9, end 1Q;_;of, a; previ6isly County-approved map consisting, of 108 sing'�e family tots on 5,.5 apres f' 1'and earth of Sumit avenue and east of Wgrdmin BulIbck Roads. APN: 226-0B2 5, 17, and 27. I. PROJECT. AND SITE.DESCRIPTION•,. r A.' Action Requested Approval `of tuilding .elevations and plot i plans. B. Project Density; ?.� dwelling units:per acre. s C. Surrounding Iaod.,gse and Zonis North - aca" '(Tract13564), Planned Coimunity. South - TraclE 13556 under construe Low Residential Ilistr.�`ct. {2-4 dolling units per acre.}. East - {lacant� County Fjoadway. West Vacant, County S�,ngle Residential PR (7,200 square s. foot min, m lei size) and;PD-2 (planned developr+rent, 2 dwelling units per acre). D. General Plan Deesi�n�atio�ns: Project :ite - Loa- -Density Residential (2-4 dweilinc4 units per acre). North - LOW Density Residential {2- , dwelling units per acre}, South Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). , East -` RCN''(Rural Conservation). West = RES2 (2 dwelling units per acre). 1 ITE1i A 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT z77 TT 13565. - STANDARD PACIFIC SeptembQr 27, 1989 r Page'2 i i II. IH,flLYSJ��� A. General: `- Tract 13565' was approved' by the County. of San Bernardino and includes 10 phases. on 159 acres. Phases<1-4 are already ,under'' construction;,with building permits having been issued by the,County of Sa - Bernardino. An Annexation and Development Agreement was,approved by the City of Rancho Cucamongao'. n Nsvember . ii,' 1988 and u�:ecember, T,, I98E respectively for the tract. Standard Pacific has submitted a design review ,for Phases 5, .9s and 10 (108 'lots) only. ;The � approved ;lots range .in, size' from 9000 to .19,593. square feet. Average 'lot size for Phases 5, -9, `and 10, is 12,287 square feet, Standard Pacific: is proposing ,four (4) floor, plans ranging i�, size frogk 2,.780,to 3,456 square feet.. Each of the floor plans has four"elevations utilizing ,Santa 8arbara,Revival, Monterey, , and California Rauch' style elevation types,, per the architectural, requirements within the'ptEoposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan. B. Desi n Review Committee: :;The. Design Review Comnitlee Kroutil, Blakesley, McNiel) `reviewed the project on Aug st 17, 1989 and approved it with the f61161,�irtg conditions: 1. Walls should be'located 5 .feet minimum from, the back of C 'sidewalks. 2. The number' of courtyard walls/entries, on all Santa Barbara Revi:yal style footprints shculd'be increased.` 3. Decorative, mzsonry, walls should be provided for` all return walls at corner,side yards, and between dwellings, 4. Corner side yar:,,!s are to. be provided with permanent irrigation systems and either turf or groundcover. 11 Groundcover, ;may, be located. on slopes"and turf should, b4 located on,fIAt, areas. ( S. Al corner lots should be provided with &`minimum of 8 15-gallon trees. 6. Color of the view fencing should be reviewed and approved., by the City Planner prior to 'the i,suance of building permits. The color should not be obtrusive ot, noticeable and should fade into the distance. PLAUING COMMISSION:STAFF REPORT TT 13565 - STANDARD PACIFIC 7 J September 27 1989 Page 3 Minor revisions 'were. reviewed by the Committee' (Blakesley, kroutil) on September. 7, 1989-, and the following additio'nai conditions were also added: 1.' Gates within the return walls between houses should,.be painted or' stained' to match the wall` Size of the members of the gates should be more substantial. 2. ` Shutters should be added to the front and right side windows (first story) on the 3A el-evatio'n. 3. The brick chimney on the 4A 'elevation should rot" be painted, but constructed of a material`si�nilar" in color to the siding. C. Technical's Review>„Committee: The Technical Review.Cowittee reviewed and.,approved the proposal ba. August` 15, 1989 subject to the additional conditions listed in-the attached Resolution of Approvalz III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with 0a JMk Development Code, the, General Plan, and the Rtiwanda Highland l Specific Plan.. The project' will• nbt be 'detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant envirdnmental ii4pacts. In addition, the-peoposed"use-is in compliance with the applicable provisiohs of the Development Code and" City Standards. ' IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Design Review for Phases S.., 9, and"10 of Tract 13565 through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. Re t ly s ed Bra er City P annex BB:BNcmig Attachments: Exhibi `"A" - Tract Map Exhibit "B"'- CoAcnptuai Landscape Plan' Exhibit "C"''- Site Utilization Plan Exhibit "D":- Site:plan Exhibit '.V Building Elevations Resolution of Approval With Corditions a i.r r. •°T MaNT ew gram.To' awr*a fo a e, s .� '' sesa. Alm {`f 'aca`a :.���'�1'��b` �M��`s�� e �'+� \�'�4� t dS�$M'�\�0��•>+ '�✓✓h 7r8�rA� �p�c. env" 1 � i�t ,,,•- �, �uosr' w M_ RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tnul MANNING DtVtgoN scil NMTK • pp EMOLn a all OA I e\4 r 1a P' a ��y Qt- NJ =•ir���r;q > " �4f h0y HIM i 1 i�la �,.� P,1„70��•7Gs. �1�41 J R a i � --..Y� #�� ■a Ifs,'■■�'�!: ih �� j��f�'•`0` �' 1.i11ti� � ftY.. N� i �� w�•r� Ail mI i VI �/' �'w1✓ �� �4wft 4wieu`rw ram^• i.`:,��I�MI"i1 jr►1 �#�.j s . r' .: C.E. ...4 : 1 , . v'4, .wrl •S Pr x� M ''YN• i...y .ix WAS" t i ��{,,; � w w +� .B a. w:fp y * a. � nFniluwi�u�aw• t ro).2e `. (�. _ a 6'' t r_. ,_r e4ywn.�....rxwra'• At Y s� H '• J � e, i ' M CITY CF REW 4 r .�• f '{ 4 • �- _ Vk , xl ,� 1 � Lam+. ,✓ 111t ' t ' l. l � i PLANNM ti ,�. � EXHIST . , i 8 y M n� " � 1 CITY OFMmt_ ► " RANCM CLUMNCA Tm.Es MANNING s SCAL 1 P i si+ssea! i 'i 1-210 I HIT tin ft@s S ors � . ,: t _ O ��1i�7[NnpitAUt>nurRittltllflttltltll 111�:�"'"!� • �r I r H M�r1,2 tt ll�y,' f � ea 1 ��' ���I F � IIuu ". .•t4 X y ! 1 I�HI(''II CC a Ili .�! !1C •' c ' { 6F II i t far i 4 t , �F alb :w 3� � 1 , � w••r•� � 7J♦�I Y f rrYl�l� �tr # r- i� 4,F*" •�:1►!!#' ,y ,:ri#�r�i,(��.' ITC•'--�`"'+,u► !-` ifliiii � £Y a �y 1 - k r A' r r 1 - (I I� 71I[lfltt44 �+f' 41 tow; 1 , �JgPoll �,ll 1�� ,i. _I �i t-41 :rt E w= to U�Ilnl l . � .—ra,�.r� a t..l.ta ra.t� Q a , a l �y^: V. IiIWVI '!_• � .Ji��� ? aYR.. dill 3 {��� ■I oC la� 11•� �ai,�■�w, ar �I�I Itt It1 uutilu ,sq t 1 +4 r t �.� {{ � tl Ilia a�f t IINIIU 4 • 111 ® _ r ` 0 0 0 r7Aa111I11Yui; � ip BM aim 11111�,II' r� i®u`IIIIC Zan fill 41 S '�?��tt�lrllr ® �' Inlllll nNnnui - .,,� I'!In'� .a= .�>� •,� !� ,_._. Illllffll �� .0 �, �fi1 fi ��II III �1 rrpN lilt J �®� � �11!I � ,�1F_.`�1 '�.�J`• 1� 1TT �I�k�(I�� �� ail,! ��I �I"®'I♦1 � � ���- ( i ���� pp�yl��[tllll]�� ��� •�' r h 17I r :���i.'4t iCr' i •l't,. ^�t„l�j' r. 'f r� \t �rl ■iliil � �� I Rim ���11[iiai■ � � � 11 ii�sa mi � T �J tt!i r1AiFl t psdj 4r■e Ike—t ad,Ki yrii Ws 3 r`'IWllgtnf II' d lilppl?��hi��l !' }`- � w 1 I drltll i ?'„ •, ��lil� ir: �illlllt :� :;• .. Vu�uu � (k ntum�' 4, �■■ Tri xv IN ti_i .��,� � �lr"• fir" .. K ��II �Grrtn� i: Jill 149 771 11 0 AAA e w:il C t u .tr , 111 'i 1'I TA 7�'f INN a i� r: ��„ �1�4 I{�yyy+ -T-i-r'1 lit •t-*�-'°-(ti� �� � .. sue' ��< _ >: •.1. ate .;7,_�_�,.a�'^ I.'�'.".. I f il7t'�dljt m �t I � �, "fl�t-If��•r�+�•:. C=iti'., sl.>.l�Ay., "L a��t ���'�� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA14ONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEWFOR TRACT AO. 13565 (PHASES 5, 9, AND. 10 OF'`A PREVIOUSLY COUNTY-APPROVED MAP CONSISTING OF 108 SINGLE FAMIV LOTS'.ON $4.5 ACRES OF LAND. NORTH OF S"IT AVENUE AND EAST OF WARDMX4 BULLOCK ROAD, AM MAKING FIND ING$'IN. SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 226-082-169 17, AND 27. A. RecitIA als, (i)'�Standard Pacific has filed an application. for the Design Review of Tract No.\13565 (Phases 5, 9 , and 10) as described in the title of this Resolution. - Hereinafter,,,the suKjodt Oesign,Review request is referred to as °the. appiicati00% r, (ii) n Se ptem4er 27, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Gucamor`ge held a meeting„to cons.4er the application. -All legal prerequisites top tj?,ad option of this Resolution have occurred.;�ti B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, :it is hereby found, determined and resolved- by the r; Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commissibn- hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A;, of"this. Resolutivtr are true and correct.. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to th?,:;Commission, during the above-r�fer4nced me�.k. g on September .27, 198% incTriding Written and oral staff reparts, this Co*fssion hereby'.:specifically finds .as_follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Flan; and (b) That, the proposed design"is-ire accord-W tthe objddtive orthia - u= Development Cale and the R" poses of the district in which the site is located; and --,i (c) That'' the, proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code ,;and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto,' will not be detrimental to the public health, >safetyp or welfar-,, or materially injurious 'to properties or, improvements ,in the vicinity.. q r PCRIYNTNG'CCiMf4lSSION RESOLUTION NO T 13565 - $TANVDARD PACIFIC, September 27, 198 Page'2 EM 3. Based upon the findings, and conclusions'set forth,,Ad paragraphs • I and 2 above, this COMIssion hereby approves the. application subject to each and every cpnditipn s4i forth below and: in the attached.-Standard, Conditions, attached hereto acid incorporated herein by this'referencd" Planning Division: 1. Walls shalI,be looted 5 feet minima from the back of sldewaiksa;; 2, The number zf Iccwryard wills/entries one Yanta Barbara �evOi�i style footprints shah be inci�,a sed. 3. Decorative maa. 7y 'walls shall be pro�tided frc al. . return walls 'fit turner side yards a %utween dwellings. e ., � 4. Corner, side yards shall be provided with permanent irrigation systems and either turf or 4groundcover. Groundcover may, be located on�slopes`and_turf may be located on flat areas. S. All cat,4zler lots shall be provided with a minima of eight (8) 15-gallon trees. 6. Color of the viewf: fencing shall' be reviewed and approved by the City planner prior to the issuance of building permits.. The color shall not be abtruaive or nottcable and shell fade into the distance,, 7. Gates within the return walls between houses shcfI be painted or stained to match :the wall. Size ofi the members of the gates shall be mom. substantial. 8- Shutters sit;O be added to the front and right.side 4inid00 {first story} on the SA elevation. 9. The brick chimney on the 4A elevation shall`� t'be painted, but constructed of a materia,' similar in color to the siding. ! 10, The landscape plan for the 'San.;5,evaine hash area 1 shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner j prior to the issuance Of building permits, 1 11, Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the 1 establirhment of `a V!ello-Roos.'CORRinity Facilities l l District portaining to, the project site to provide ij PLANNING, COb7MISSIQN�RESOLl1TIQN N0: T 13565 - STANDARD :PACIFIC September 27, 1989 Page 3 in conjunction with the applicable School District for-the construction and maintenance :of necessary school,faciliti s, . However, if'any School District has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the aiteroative,- consent -to_-the- anne_zatiotv 'of,--the- project site: into the territory of such e;cistioci District prior to the issuance, of bufldin� '+ permits. Further, ,if the affected Schoo ='bfstrict has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve ;months of the date of approval of the project and prior-to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said ,project, this conditian shall be deemed null and Void. f Rancho Cucamonga Fire District: 1. The applicant shall contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District r°garding Wildland Interface.Areas for specific requirements prior to the `issuance of l building, permits. Ask Engineering Division: 1. The design for flood protection racilities along the north project boundary shall be 'ipproved by the City Engineer and the necessary easements recorded prior, do the issuance ofbuilding permits. At a minimum, provide a trapezoidal channel an&3 foot high flood wall within 11 feet of dedicaticn. 2, All drainage facilities shall be installed to the ;satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3.. Landscape and irrigation plans for all public landscape areas shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. 4., A Consend and Waiver form shall be filed with the City Engineer, agreeing to form and/or annex to the appropriate`Lighting and Landscaping District prior to the issuance of building permits, IJ 5. On all corner lots, structures shall be located outside the inter.sect;on lines of sight :;to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineek All landscaping, mounding, and slope encroachment within PLANNING COMMISSION PIESOLut OX NO U T`1366a STANOARD-PACI IC September 27, 1.9 Page 4 the Limited Use Areas shall be approved b . #he �4t Traffic Engineer,. Lots 13 and 27 in. Tract``' 35 -9 require specific approval. 6. The driveway on Lot r14 in Tr xt 13565=�) shall be located as .close to the west: lot line as poseibie . per,the "Alternative unit Plotting plan. 7. mere.,tots front onto the inside of the curve in t ltidgeline�Crestline Place,, the. entire parkway shall be a "Limited Use Area'F, with landscaping, subject to, City Traffic Engineer.OProvat. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to-`the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTEO THIS 27TO 0AY OF SEPTeM$Eii, 1989. PLANNING'COCIISS30;!�UP_1liE CITY t1i=rAtiGilO CUGA�tON6A Ilk BY. Larry fiNie r" ATTEST; raj Ruller7 Secretary I Brad Buller, Secretary df the Planning Gbmnission of the. City of Rarcho Cucamonga, do hereby .Certify,`that the foregoing Resotuti6n was duty and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the ;Planning CoMission o$ the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day uf.Septermber, 1959, by the following vtft4o-vrit:- AYES, COROSSIONERS: NOES: COMMUSIONCRSt ABSENT. Ct)F'MISSIONERS; w . Ask t ih Also 'V 32P=j $lt Avila _ t� iiYY Mm 4 pis z \g f g S k:. _ _ �a�� �« 7�•�~"^ gym ' � m"Ilk mP "'ls op o ��°o�_:- .i ya BV�'x agpt�g m eu Ira cv m"W VJ M m C s CS'r:-All � � S ">I O ._ s- _ o S g ca If �y « am �m x� #`-a`j m.'����: ''� Zi } YPP L m %3 Lam. : '\i\ � • � '!�'. � �: � '�� �~�� ,:•� yak a.. i% ((''���{ '� ${a�p�• 1l.®�y�'r�t .r o,�, may.a. g'a{a�'8'Y�� � a .p� @»� �3 �i ��� �.x y® VA.':®i• Q��q �'V tl� `VL y� N�y p e fS ,y M e�� �.Q ci 1.. N.S gi QQ O 29 B" tg.g y�•°4 ...mac�$ q�iyY�IgOb 01 Q.=3 ��� iYb'�, i 6 �yANAA S c Ng_.pL M c. qa$ ee: E yat � sE4e,'L °'f:C. tlr $Sa Mf6 29, _JO Y6p VgP N� 4i W°.np. YN •+t„J6» Ct�.Eg{yy� Mqy o �--2 pp819 Ail YY�mIp T vN OS�YIf; YgNp g •YC J eL Y9J�OY A 94.�Z L tl�m. �gQ � �Y NrI.�Q,g ✓ p lit • Si aty56=. •Nv ooNY PC ®T ,,pYpYqp F�.ZI I®Y lit• ��O P.;M]q ~g°CA LeOr� YaV p•NYy @4�L. +yyi :BP�6 y -'Y`4 •.•r+ »Y$,e°y.�til y��;q�iQyyTs O q�CW _Y.q— ^ oa� '�.:s� T•.�°q N"� Ye...; �M � 5�4. isy�O .Y r•,» Wypy Rp V YA® ss o •• VC g ni O 4 W 99�^¢ NYW .N p ' '.s Cwg. 4m 3 y,! i^yP@ Ya pg0 qTQ C '}.,��Y. ^� rsl�w .�i VY qp� aDt tO��mL•UT y$$. tlPM NLapN � •N�q^_ _,W �l sN `.� q�e„�� LCN6•- YyV1b N ,pa 66_9C@.YLlE�$B QYp`.YY�YadVVVb�s 4$®44NqB tl�AaftVp�::Lc7 VOY H�1�j S <y 6 M�.+(®•�+y�Y dp V6Y�.`!!: Y�:ua:r��.. � �Y y��pg6�glima B _ Tju. }e^�: �•� new � b its o If Rogs 'r 7 i�®am®s Yi slag . m s y N•i Y® $� .. ��a. �. �g p &.S yp 0 t� a i2y.04 yY��Y 23 so an ed .6 SO Nll Ir _ 6 ` �� Y s•p� a•_AI�Y -%32 N t ' •o .� q M O •: ev. � o 4`IO tiOiti �� fI Ste¢' g•J OS OO�i�NNL4S ey®� C �H _ Y ti g L iz� as �N LLJ `.. A V b N4K5. V.Na mL 'b`« �6 }yt Jd NY.gpVy�tt N iM'O C ppuu y tll yy�y? NCO N^w� ssii 11�� YrACY r•C..q� P�$� �lrl: �Nq NN �.••�NN p �N4TP Oagq��c•�@ (��.NC L''Otl��e w� OQ+OSy,a WGY . .C.i. i�y Q� ^t$Lw.o. �54�•�p g9N..'L' .tlup G g NC +qCr Tr Ui,�J�a.S��yl 6W® IAS �p w'lit CC M i1 D �w Y 6p V p L�YP w iC 6!N y z CFa/ COI n_ OYYY 6Y5 �HN ary` 'yyy •—OL'�®4C NG G��� � pg 4gp��ti ytJ .a YMa UcfgHN ,a�S. � ,�p Olpyy:� "WaY1C [� Y Y•N O u^« A�,1 G O v �!�y S 6 M r 9 L.pI N y r .'J. f 1 A-S C 5►,.` Y .� O'YYYC�JJJi. 1p`1t �w C Y O a 1i S w N Ytl lYi to � 4 N- 4pppb war �e-r qw. Q ®r� op6`pprprygAA6V6!'S° NM.4N® C.N AT �� RYwi i1� NOa�IIip +N�OY bpi$$r I � wpg ^M �® « •tX0 !P py Y �6YCL ®.M' �3!.. e`' L�LM '^•sO gBpp�myY @mr yy Q "b6 Inw NaN 4am .S r. ,"w/ti 6. ►�Ni KP1Vmm ND•OPq 6I 1 m C ri W Ifi 50 ri f19.l++! �� 8 �4g Si.gx " IL ..,vat , 2r."SBi +9w —3 a H {f wyd � � ® �Y{fg1 �irtl 96 y Mel ®M�14s��y aQ M Y�p M�06� is ymRY,..o�' S�« ' �. obS.� eq mQtl�j{ «:U«� �tlQ®•' �� Y NpM�rY�FE� R•a 3obeO axe um vT 5_ AA 14Ayi :+w..a <u7;j , a+ 6'a�cr� m8 p V I p iSr 0 u s tj [r om - na. Hw w V eti 01 jig Sap! u _ �e Y� WmL S.n yy4���. � C@}g ;B.. 7 V ? Ga ~ q0 pp q d p8�tw Ld� W p 0D3 :. ugOpyyL Ypt39^1iCtl LV �eCYTd 4 ggV cc y aw- L Y■ S 4 0G/�L 4tl' M q qm{. S 'g� Y 6. 0 2iy 6 swiL•_ •VlJ cC+v�a�yyI fielas gCHYEIpp ta. 3 O pmtl yg� ® Pgy s• 9 SQ tl' irSA BLY.vi.6 ��e .u� MiWb 6��YyW B�d of I um �s P w ii Y i O� R � P P .91 �a �y3 K2 � Ze Y "'gam �� •. i��8,� Y Qw, a� b e Uh leaf -111 `Qa �' P '. I 'toil , Utz � gN� }� L .. �Np�Y���p ■$��—13 qa . 5 a..g „+;, �p Y S . �C•W ,yr~� Q gqe t.: 9 Ny :aIgU, �F i @'VV w 1Y tY®.4i §.eau ;_n f�------------- s $ a 4a^ _ uj dam. D�.Y��C OqL sY L :ro v�OJ� Og cu as ZZ v« y w b Y 4 O� IT: 'di's. a E CL a� � SF$„Y8 u 6Y $$ ^ 8 � ® a f� -- $` "<$a ag'wwo�.S` `� �,� ..:p S Q .p4 3 ,,,b�l,i •• .'Y' � c illy &, WOi COY'n 114 V® yo L M C^'� 21 g pp 1 g� U e. $'w�tl a p "� TL gin ell I ag T o N gait Y 2. 34 MD, MIX Oe 1, �a ` �A ® s i '31 r u it 1 �oS •gd g ts .8 .. Jr �o .�. 73z $• �0 18,9:1LB as tit8 .Y « `c alp, ki �$ 75 "ybQ yN �yy CY s :_ E uu py:A.� Y6 p� y m M o� �L_ '.O'�i pL�� � 01 r Lp:.� �� ➢yI L`� Y aG O 'i. a C^pC0 UQ sib •Y ` 6 `Y 6y^ ��0•.. '=p J'J� C .M •�' YY�` � ^W:tl�p 00^ QAi\e�,. g yy 11�k. "gq� �.0 .L`..:�' b K•o su- O-I Ywy�..Y M 'i± r��6 MY �^ Sf. �.b g w�q pY�4 S- m W M d Y r Y w Y Y a 4": r a a ' ® N d Yi..•�aL YNC $u ei.`., 'rid w L'u� $�. �`rI i`° � .a. Sa O M� 5 g •• fig RUN CO mom. � tj ILO VNb ��pjls iy4Cb S! ��pp �.. .. ��$$II 'fi�r.. ®p e��{ p q " a9B 'A d VL y ee yy�. -a�O V®sq�e w�iA f 0 m m r e6 J � U\ O e �� a dad :d 10 .�.V e ego � fi �uL 0 LL ti Yo gig, � a 8. co jugIL y44 pa Air .. w r " wg � as wg S t:•" g3x; � _� { jai q4 ddg~ �I lL Sf1"�g 6- •_N � � m c� may'. byi�w OH: ��� Y *• ''{{yy�••t���1{$$ty. f d g pY w 1•�Ii.ffipr M: x..a'1' (wD.$ ®®®B i[ Y��r wir Se sw�"a' .Y 9 x�Y' . r ii 1 , ,r---- Ci Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT e DATE: September 27, 1989 r TO: Chairni)n and Memters of the }Manning Commission ' FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner 8Y: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner, SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR 'DEVEL/1PMENT REVIEW" 85-42 KOTOFF - A proposal' to construct. 168 apartment units on 9.03 acres of land ,in the Medium-High. Residential- _Distr_ict , (14-24 dwelling .units per acre) located north-6f;Base Line Road 550 feet east of Day Creek Channel F APN. 22�'-091 21, Associated with the-proposal-is Tree.Removal Permit 87-67, I. BACKGROUND: Development Review 8542 was approved with conditions by the Planning Commission on October 14, 1987. :On July 21, 1989, the applicant, Mr. William J. Kotoff, requested an extension of the approval in order to allow him more time to: proceed with the project. Section 17,02.100 (8) of the Oevelopment Code allows for up to 36 months of extension. Typically:, extensions are granted In i2 month increments. II. ANALYSIS: Staff has°analyzed, the, ,proposed time extension and has compared the proposal with current development <criteria outlined J in the Development Code and the Victoria' Community Plan. Based upon this review, staff determined that; the project meets the Basic Standards for the Medium-High Resldentiai District (14-24 dwelling units per acre). III. FACT's FOR F-----: ,INNINGS" The Comn,issi.on-must make all; of the following fin Tngs in order to approve this appiicatian: A. There have been no significant changes in the -Land Use Element, Development Code, or character of the, area within which the project is Yocated, that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent or non-conforming. B. The granting of an extension would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, ormaterially_injurious to properties or improvements in tha v9c -ity. IV. RECOMMENDAT1ON: Staff recommnends that the Planning ;Commission approve a one ' 1) year time extension for Development Review 85-42 through adoption of the attached Resolution. ITEkIrR' � PLANNINdlJCOMM SSION STAFF REPORT DR 85-42, KOTUFF September 27, 1989 Page 4 Respec, submits rad filer City PI BB:SR:sp K l Attachments:' Exhibit IV,— Let:te� from Appl;c4nt J Exhibit "B"ti- Loeatioir Map, Exhibit "VI Site.Plans _ Exhibit "R=" - Elevations' Resoluuian Na. 87-178 Time Exteosion Resa1atfon of'Approval r J y, �1 f' r July 21, 1989 Stephen Ross Planting Dept. City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Boat 807 Rancho Cucamonga Cal: 91730 Sr, oss; This letter is to request the planni!ng'-Commission to grant me a one year .extension on Tentative Tract Map DR89-42 File \o. or 9.03 ac Nls Das,s Line, ?,/o Day Creek. Enclomd is a check for s62.00. 1 had sent a previ us check and request approximately two Months ago but they'e=items,apparently have been lost. Thank you. Cordially � ., `' William J. 1 o. �' 1Q �4 OF ITEM: U 5-4Z Tun f-wT N HO C t1 °�Z°� : �.eVgf L icar� Arrucowr PLANNING DIVISION '�'`� ��HIB IT: A SCALE: 4YY LM q4Lfw Lm + . ,;.a UA 1 YQ:Y D �4 Yra w 0 W Lm RR k9 f R RR mw 4� :; � R �RR i.t��• CI ' OFx� r RANCHO CUCAMONGA, TITLE:�.� ��a�•. � PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT,4, �.SCALE: .: ,J. 1 t,. L F— �a cu .. k�\ � •.r.t_ Baal.�G I +•e...•tee 1. ; iti :s�.. "' .- wu+dlel tnm la:aa. f- .• .. ' - • CY ~, U CL .� r— VIM som t ..tom. 1 .. El l � !�11.E:. i • .�. 1 Ila �+sowtirlatb. � e+. s �. ems.s'c• �;'- � .��..� V .fie. ^'-'x.wwn rwrrw warn .r•�ae�b��_.. N RT1 i PL .NN[liE; C)il' EXHIRAT=— SCALL. r y . ti. .a. Y"yr• 4 K h R e _v 3 *' A ); v � r flit i 11 t 4` } 1 WC M Dow- RESOLUTION t�t $7-17$ 04 Es �Apr IN A RESOLUTION OF THE RAttCta tigA, Pt.ANttlt CO RtsSTH ApP 11W A MO,IPNIE°1Y OF 168 AP ENT ON 9,03 AV PA THE MEO%t A.If H RES gROA��550� ��EAST.�P N t3�E i;R� SIpE OF BASE LIN M CHANNEL AM* X. rovC11 of ti,l y611: iaa► katoff W filed .an app,ication t R���Resolution, is e10 end Review Mtn» $ 4 described h rsebib act i �t apc ►�of vie tfrequa'�i�r�, Keveinamfter 't this ykesolut a lication". O I*sion of refe,�red to as � e app i967r the PlAnninq lica�iorl and till ,A a th of, 14th Of."on4gotedri I otirg on the DPP the OtY of k_... on'that date. tonclu&4 said ;iOtinB i i) All legal p�requisi+es to Vie' adoption of this have occurM4- g, eD� fou ResaluA„ dettrstined and resdived by the ROW, �tfEAEFORE, it C►aca hernd,. planning C issian of tim City' of Hantho x�onga a$ folks: 111i's Cission hereby speoificalt finds mat all of tre feats �k1. the g itxEls, Park A. of.this Ndsolutian are tr,,.,8 and correct set fn �. in ressnted to this "Mission act Lobel' 14 2957, including �rritten and- 2 - Sased upon substantial edidety, p finds as ?alloWS. daring Lhe above�reft Cc fission hereby sPdcif tally f oral staff reptrtS, located on In" north lies to p�pety ta3e aPplicatiaat; pp Creek Channel vacant Land tteet feet and lot daps of 313 �qet and is p"xently test are side o� o� Line �cqd, 5�Q feat eazt a# �� front,g sa%m't east, and ({ lroa�,, party toe L!6 norms, $i16 al* h, sou"'end eat is the rest is +d1od',with_a ,ire atatfidnt 1 designated for resIMAti$► usesr lli pronbr ; r4 f� ,. . prsseniiy Varan$" P r�tih Lhe recas nded condition,% Of oafppRan ha �I (4) '01e gr`apasal, nt s adards of he City dies With the anima develap� Cucamonga. tents is consistent with the Tice dcalnnt Of a diu #iteesiderttial laud use ddz�garatisl ofti Gerral plan. Me_ ' n rc 'S II PLANYINa,`iCaMissION SOL'!rT%ON'No. .'( DMLOPMENT REVIEW 85 d2 KQ7DFf >� ' October 14-, 1987 Page; 2 S. Based upoi",the substantial evidence presented to this Comission daring the above-referenced Meting ,anti upon the spacific ftndinps,of facts . set "orth ire paxagrapta 3 and '2 conc.ides as,foT,igws; abaye: this Gaorssissian hereby:finds and ta? That the,,-�roposed pro ect is cantrstOA with thb, ob4g41hfC of the pro Plan;, a�7d, IA. (b) That � �, proposed�use i$ i'0, ctcoriG with the objectofe of_ the A' '�Vel OPMent,. `C.'�dle and` the Purposes. O�f "fie dig.�}ct in wtrich the site is f located; At r r (C That *.M proposes use is in compiiaki, ,with 1 ear of �the�' tipiicabla' provisions of "the ia�z< �lnpalLEat Gpde; rz[�C�'' tdi . fnat- Fite ;.Proposed uses ° ogether ith'+ttte cana�ti4+a applicable. trrgit0, 11 not be datrir ntai, t0 to public heart stisafety, or ' welfAre 4:6r *aterially iajuri0u5_t0 prrapertios �- or,iaOrov nts in thj 'vicinity. . �. This--t lesion ireroby'finds an certi irs t4tat the prejert has begin reviewed and sa0sid red irr t:a pt.ia�rce with the tjillf0rni8-00r6kntal Qua" Y Act of 1070 and, fur�the:'y this ,Cofti$tioa ,hereby issdod a; �legat'i;�e Declk. }tion. 5,_ .Based upon the findings Conc:,usions sal; forth in paragrapfl 1. 2 and 3'abp,a% this C issian; heruby'..approxes �e ��aplicati,un st76J��t.;t0, each., and wary cOnditi0r+% set forth, b23bmr and in the ei:taiChed Standard / Conditions attached here, ancytt es rporsted.Aat*airi by this refrerenGe, A. Plaa»in Division-�'' *4 f'el$ ng 'It- shall fie incur par ated ;i"to, the final "landsnam and irrigatrOr. plan solidi are su , t revie and approval by the Design Re+►i ► � ctee Ariar to the tssuanse; of brlitditrg :Rits a, A Perimeter wallge9cce '`W?ttt piia,i�trs shall °be rnqei*e`. around 1he site. Dscoratjvot , nonmvi a 4bsCurinj fencing shall be p+avi'ded at Out space areas. tare index of re feirce shall , °bsr so�sstr t t of a deCo0atiVejattr,il - db�rsisterkt, rii the.aka itectilre oar the units. ld1 r. I�I�Ti77tl � 'Pi�liK109N6i1`5�'S�i�omee��ai�.n�i' PLMRIPM MLaSI0�9-f% SOL'(i�rl0f� NO. DEVELOPMEN17 RiVIEV,,_>j;42 ROTOPP h nctingr 14a 1987:" Pege ,3 b. Landscaping shalt be provided ad3acent,to the emergency. access it ,the southwest 1' cornier of the rsite to obscure visibiI daw the drive aisle. c. A'vfsti:1 Corridor.:sha11 be progidld frstsr Base Li e woad to the central open space. d. The)--OWk)itree at.the nor .t)n•: olrtion of the'isito shall, be prRservet(in place; ;Na . lardscapang: or <irrigation 'shall be, install.ed.,withio fikse .drip' Tine .r!f the tree: The:' sidewalks shall`'be ;realigned to an area outside the drip TNe of the tree: 2. A final :acoustical aralyt'J shall be-submitted to ensure that` noise, levels -do not exceed. theCo maximum permit by 4. The building plans'yha]i be rev{s+:d to incorporate c,e%�lar mitigation rmasures. . The, .report. and the pl;aos, shall ' be reviewed, and approved by Vp City Planner .prior to the issuance of building per34ts.; , 3. A trellis consistent wit.4 the architectural theme shall be provided. on:the side sievations. The plans shall be to and approvpa`by the City Planner prior; to the isuance of building permits. " 4. the trees locat a. within the Base Line right-of- 1 Way shall be replacedr in the near strectscape setback area with the'largest nurse4 or trews available as determined by the City. Planner. 6. IN PASS enclosure closest to the oak tree shall °I be relocated to the and of e.carport across the dr'ivy aisle to the southeast: 6. The sound .attenuati.on 'wall slang Base Line shall be offset and softened with 5erd_lands6ping. B. Engineering Division 1. Easments for., reciprocal use over and across all drivo aisles and accars points:wi",thin the project in fac+r of the pro&arties located to the reast' and psi~ of tite '0 eel site gh ty 'be provided 4 prior to issuance of building pea rZ os. k r r (Q ct ,r ror PUW�1Etif CodMISSIONr. SDM6TION T30. QEYE4.003T REVIEW 85-4'�._N ®TOFF 4otoben' Paw 4 , i 1. 2. Am.agre'emen4:and surety shall he pr6vide6 for't:ee T ,the temporary aFctss-,and Tlepl 4cewnt of°.;street WeWellpermanent access to the .. west mpr•ov esnents is` provided on_ 'Bjse Fine Road: MA ftMM -access to `fhe area shal,l be provided at - a !ainimum of 840, feejt frog the edrtirline of proposed Da;;re c,Boulevard. r - 2. TEtit, proji i PPCated`w$thiit a orf2 `"A":E dad i Fiazar rea due to the posslbla 6veril owL DAY ,Creek i;tiannel.. Final plans shall not.be eCreptce for LLreviebi nor,'bui,'!ding and gradi'ng par its issued until Phase ft if the ;Day. Creek Channel pro iect, is`und`er Construction.< i 4. Storm:-drain' pipe' and catch ::bajins` si;a11, he Constructed oar A,aze linen goad<to. connect to' the ' Day Creik :C+hanniV.16-tho satin artibn of'the°. Engineer: 1,. , Ott in-lieu fee for ,:ine-half the Cost of the construction, . :including lasgdsCaping and irrigation, for the ow-dian ,island on Base. line Road .shall be paid to +,he, City prior to the issuance of buildi�tg pat�aits. - The seial I be based on: .the. .len ' of the, Basil': _ine `Road Frontam� of. .thyL project, the aiodnt to be detees�irwd',by i:�'�e CI tit Engineer: .Q f 6. The - 6ttistiwg overhead lut 0,ttias. (teieeowunications and Olectj ical) ..on the- praJeet side 'of, . Base, Line;'; �d shall be undergrom. ded frdas the first o e offsite east of the via `project boundary' to ..the 'first ;pole offsi Est of tile'cr acceptance.,je` vast project boundary,;prior to public impYovnt r ocCupariCy; _ aAsichaver =curs, first, :4eimbursewnt of one- half:the City adopted `Cost. for° undrrgrauevding from filur'i dswelopoment as it occum 'on the, opp®sit,4 side of the street is feasible because the p'r'opeoty 41 undeveloped. 6. i'he Deputy. Secretary to.. thi ;' Cowlission sha11' cer",ifiy. to the adoption of this Resolution: _- PLANNING CtAMESSIOK bLUTION NO., DEVELOPMENT REVtLV Sb-42 - ICOTOFF October 14, 1987 l ALptDYED A�lG AOQPTEO THIS a4TWA'l OF OGTOgER, s9$7. % r r PLANKING.C"ISSION OF THE,,.C1TY.OF'{2AF{CiiO;GUCAMfl4iGA arty a r+nars ATTEST: r epu .Nretaty f, Brad Buller, Deputy, 57-'r@tary-0 the ,Planning Cossl i ®n=of the, City of tu.. Ra►ieho Cucamonga, do hereb --4*ertifY that thi foregoing Resalution"�a$'duly.and regularly introducedj.passed, and adopted 6Y the Plane ag Comuission of the City of Rancho CucartUngaat a -regular.n*eting of the-PUnnin,g`�C ission held on the 14@2t day of October, 1987, by the falloxing-Vol-to-Wit;, I AYES: COMMSSIO4ERS:'' TOLSTOY; BLAKEtEEY, CHIT EEA, "EM4ERICK, 11CNt.EL NOES, CQi 4IS5I0tlERS: N04E, ASSENT: COMISSLONERS: "NONE' „ r� C. A v-t QRESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING' COMMISSION OF THE' CITY OF;, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 'CA IA LIFORN APPROVING A TIME EXTENST,nN FOR DEVELOPMENT RE01 kS: `85-42 AND MAKING FINDINGSrt'IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN:'.'227491-21, A.. Recitals. . ti:,). 'Mr. Williat� J. Kotoff ,has filed an application for the extension of Development Review. 85-42 as, described ,in the ` title of this Resolution.' -,Hereinafte,r`in this Resolution, •the subject of Me Extension is referred to as ,;'the application",,. (if), On the 14th of October,' 1987; this Commission adopted 4,ts�} Resolution pia. 87-178 thereby Approving /,subject to-spew;fI,c conditions 0,,nd time llmit:s, Development Fe view'85-.42. (iii) All legal Iprerequisii�.v, to the adoption of this Resolution u have occrrid._ i B'. `Resolution. C NOW 'THEREFORE, it, is ;_-i^eby found, determined '�Jd "resolved, by.,the Planning Cc,�rniss.ion of the City of Rancho Cucanongar�as f ow�q_- 1, This: Copmission hereby specifically finds � _oil of, the, facts set forth 'in the Recttals, Part A. ofithis Resolution are true and cbrreM y - \` 2: Based upon substantial evidence.,presented to this orroistion, including written, and oral staff reports, ` :his Cominisslan hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The .pneviousl,y approved Development Review,85y42 is in substantial compliance with the City's 'current General t Plan, Specific Plans," Ordinances,_ Plans, Codes and Policies; and (b). The extension of Development Review 85-42 will not cause significant _inconsii,stencies with the current, General Plan, Specific PTans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies; and (c) The extension of Development Review' B5 2 Js not likely to cause. pubT ,c heajth or safety problems, a:�d (d) The extension is within" the time limits prescribed by suite 1aw and local or4nanc'z. PLANNING C;nbiMISSION RESOLUTION NO., f OR 85-42= KOTOFF. September"27,; 1989 Page 3. Based upon the -findings and conclusioOs;`set forth n parairaphs _l and 2;abave this, Commission hereby y grants a Time Ex'ic.on.for: Project 6 1ican4 Ekpiratiori VP OR 83-42 William J Kotoff October 14-' 1990 4. .The Secretary,to this Commission shall certify to".the adoption of this Resolution. ' µ J l APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS� 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER,"1983. y PLANNING COMMISSIOVOF THE :CIV'OF'RANCHO; CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T, Mc iel, Chairman ; ATTEST. Brad Buller, Secretary " 1, Brad Buller, Secretary- of the Planning'Commission, of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga,, do hereby certify that the foregoing Re solution.: duly and regularly,introduced, _0&ssed,J and. adopted by the Planning Commissiop of the City,of'Rancho Cucamonga,, ai: a regular Waeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of September, 1989; by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONM: ; NOES: COMMISSIONERS;: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. eB r-14 f F r '�♦ Ii CITT QF RANCHO CUCANIONCA STAFFREPORT C7' _ 'l DATE: September 271 1989 TO Chairman and.KemberS of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller`, City Planner (: BY: Steve Hayes, Assistant Rtannner ' SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO DESIGN REVIEW .FOR TENTATIVE TRACT`1z - BLANTON -.The .design,'review of a, new building elevation and rev is, unit mix for. Phase .2 o'f a, prev7ous7y 'approved71 tract map +consisting of 135 single Family lots on,67.67 acres, of land in. the Very Low. Ri'siderk�iaT, District (1�2 dwei'1ing.units per acra "of the; Etiwanda Sific Plan, located at the southwest corner of ttiwan.,�k—Avenue and l 24th Street 225-11148 and 39, I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. 'Action:Reauested: Approval of a new building footprint and related elevations (Plan 6) and revised unit m , for Phase z4` of Tract 12659. B. 'Overall Tract'Densiisy: 1A9 dwelling.units per acre. C. Surroundingland Use"and Zoning; North ` Vacant; Low Residenti`ai district (2r4 dwelling K"mits per acre) South ' r Existing single = family "residen`e; Estate acre )ential District (0-1 dwelling,;units per East ,; - Cucamonga County Water, District Water Treatment Facility; Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) Nest Vacant, Unincorporated County Area D._;General Plan Designations:- Project Site Yery Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per ace)` r North Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) a , South ..Very tow 'Residenti l (less ttan 2 dwelling "'units per acre) i bpi I C PLANNING COMttISSiON STAFVREPOAT TT 12654 2 - BLANTON f September c7 1989 Page„2 East Very Low Residential' {less than 2 dwelling units per',acre) West - Open Sgice E. Site Characteristics: The site .is currently vacant -with building "pads rough graded for single family residences. Mze 1," which` is' Immediately to the, south, is 'currently, under Construction. Tte Metropolitan date-;`District easement is located along the a;orth boundary and a portion o'f the�Nest boundarly':of the.Overall tract` An existing windrow of"Blue Gum Eucalyptus birders the site, the adjacent property to the south.of Phase I. II. ANALYSIS- . A. Back'round„ Tentative Tract 12659 was approved by the Plarnt�8,;:aission on November. :13, 1986 as custom lot . subdivisi;on.�;'`Pua'se i, has been recorded while:Phase 2 is in i - the processObf being .recorded.' One of the features Of'this tract incl�oes a centralized equestrian area for the keeping and maintenance of horses' instead :of the typical stable on ' each homeowner's lot. fOn September 9, 1987, the Planning Commission approved the I Design Review of building vations for all, phases of the tract. Approval included 5 tWels ranging in size from 2,122 . to 3$ $O square feet (see Exhibit G). Three rf `.±he f' originally approved models are;,one-story and the remaining two plans are two-story. For -informational purposes, the approved elevations of house plans one through five have,been include, in this rtpprt as E:J,Ibit_"c". B, General: ' The applicant is proposing to incorporate an as dditional model (kAn 6) 1 into Phase 2 of tho approved Tentative- Tract 12659 The new plan consists of a two-story, 3 54? square foot with three contrasting front elevations (see Exhibit; Also included with this mod`iiication is the subsequent rdvisioh 'of the unit mix for Phase 2 of this tract. Originally, Phase 2 consisted of ;24 one-stony and IZ_two- story plans. The applicant is proposing tn�-r4vise,"th,6 unit mix for Phase 2 to incorporate U. one-story;units :arid 24 two- stpry models. The applicant has stated that` they have incorporated more of th€ larger two-story units.An Phase 2 dine to the increased market demand for larger, units. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 12659-2 - BLANTON September 27. 1�89 Page 3 C. Desi n Review Committee: The Design Review Cotwgittee Blakesiey, Kroutil reviewed the proposEd modifications for Phase 2 on September 7 1989 and recommended, approval subject to the following, conditions: ' 1. Driveway approaches shall be reduced to a maximum width of 16 feet and driveway .widths shall be reduced• within front yard setbacks wherever possible. 2. Additional :wgod si!ing shall be continued along the, side elevations r'6f Plara 6 to provide more complete side , elevation articulation. 3. Additional' articulation shall b6 added t2 t,r, accent features of• Plan 6, such .asj' but not, limited. to, chimneys. columns, foundations and windows. III. FACTS-.;FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Genera-,,,Plan .and Etiwanda specific 'Plan. The%project will not bd'"detrimentai to .the public- health or safety or cause nuisance or significant adverse environmental `4mpacts. In addition, the proposed Use and, Site Plan, together with the " recommended Conditions of Approval, are Jp, compliance with applicable provisions of the Etiwanda Speci,cic Plan and City Standards. y r, IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planing Commission approve the Design Review of the new Building El',,-vation' and Site Plan for Tentative Tract 12659-2 through adoption .of the attached resolution. Ras ly tte . Bra ler City fsianner RB:SNsp _ Attachments: Exhibit "All Site Utilization Map Exhib''it "B" -'Site Plan ; Exhibit "C" - Building Elevations for previously approved models' Exhibit "D Building Elevations for Plan 6 Exhibit "E'- Floor Plan for Plan 6 Resolution of Approval C-'"3 �w -s, r :ram. Original Poor Quality i 'r 1, itb`t75CE)h11 F.P1, X NIAU 11 THACr ., r-- t.`"s litr,^• r+y.'— f.�.~,. �'�� ,i�`r\ r—t" (y (f' �= � Y: .. �t_E ✓! l� ` �',� kiAIRL 'I if d t e mg 64 SCALM y �—1.n+�+. .� J ft sa YO rt'/'" \ •''� �'111 � �4 !1^•k � r �1 Y����.\ \ii 1 C: y�l CJ)" a {� w 1. } p �t nn��u�u�r�iYrt�» �� 6� f!• n�srutNs��t a 4°�: e 3 G� , q :�= �� .r•`�vr+.w..""'rw'.' .M1``'�w����Rk "1 ,���„�.�..cif."�"...�-"'--,��`�'�'s�w�....�'": 'fir., � � �+`la' 4? �' � � J,$+F+.s4 Y�lii �..� �� �.,.•.r.,-��++�5'y. k w��•.. a �"d ,.�+.w .:iy�r.v..ri r +''r'�' d �y a y / 4 y� r• "s "'rt r"i � i 6 v 'a <�dk I • .': ��� �y.+`r,R' � ',��«�'S �� �I11'..• �s.ti.�L�iw���ja.s� '3 a�� .. �' .6 'Fr "r2 hn 4; R w'Yh�,q Rom^ ,a•Jvri.y� 4 r�$''��'L.�� ^1',t Mra: 5��� ro h, y:Y t� rr� T'Rti *R. £a�; viz <» a y t,. r y} _nq................ iF- 5 i' r f r{.91 / -It ri"f A •Ai ry � yilsr9tn1 L�L 'hr f I x ✓' r o > 1 i +� Syr. �aa�{ •. �, �•; s j� �*' lr} ''� � r.i..:..,,�^•vt a 7 •..max-.,;f' kY �� a..►— Y 1'. tti e�h � •>y '�"`' -ems �' ;;r:-• '1 •�„�+'� ;Nr. rAl }f t�1 g C ty}� 4 � �3.. A• F 1 t i �- t$ t I y Y d I a � % � ♦� G. 1� ♦ ���-� 3 e' �'.a,y < h i„t. s -, F* t 0' ...r'+\y Y� ♦` r . "h +-� t t 'A 1:17 1 t -1 lj� i ';;I� .•i r' ""7� !' a —.+r2�h t \�5 .1y } Y..., � `� .� YS�` .w� � �� R��A' .aV• elf r �w� ��' , �+ } } _ 7i •R � n Yy. .i •; F_', >;,"A�is ix( i, t f. 4 �f� x ��x a x, �. x- 1 R, Tyr s is +� T A J ra: r A 7 �� � i� ��1����dr r•v nvrir �' A �4ty.-7•�si1 �ii„ 79 ^tom�3'Y..iY1��r z. +sue c♦'c � r.r'r� J +-�, �" q " ,� '-" ;., z vG d Tyi �P- KX► +fi-���F.>� 7i�` ��"�Jam; ����' � �"wK tx�,�aer.( .'%- '.r ..+, r:,.�� .�.An1es►,!fJ• aeN.:"� '!� t 4' M �6 ��. •{ � `",.!'��.�., ��,,'�1ds� +uw�urinrtrTr ti'�4�, _ a — �_ * ,etg��•+la .'r3I i III wr - r "ive!"fS�'`��`;1ti�ry�s''... �... .�.i *i.� a rt e'l•'' -:s i j • t • q � T Z+•w� t}� � �a, "'�'"'" Y ,� -. r �r "` '� 'far",; F a, Y ^��'`'�'�Y � ,q, r• ' iL� "` '� J �-`� i art �. i h 1�lnUtiH k�h.'iC:. lr"...v"' �,'�,"'° �,#,,. � - '` � u� ,'^ �•'.. r ' p } .V Sn F 7lw . ; . -�•- � yam., _ .. ��° � . ,-2��y. •'�• k+. t •D' eat ,+�e'v. 'a �'�►~�,. Pik„ � - "��'tk�"S �f.: ra y+d t , i. ) *J a S � ✓f,.Y. 1: i, 1?KR+.w ww - jjE� yxS K `P t' � � i � -•1 ') � J ,' a 1 �r r. .�. Ye 3a 6��Lal .i_11,''A.lmJ.l E• d, , y lk' �• F. 7 1 �tllF @ � is 14! t�. � �` //i`ria�iiYL�x Ykt tliX� 4 + R IT w ry A .r A' 3. � i■��,,„, � lrraa.v.�•, tt� . t ;�'lti.rrr{....�..� +F h ���* ♦~ •`-ti�„vy "Y�.:; L:�.11.1ey „Mi.F��--��•--=.� (�yfs i�, p " • mar- �'�� .;.���:'� �,.. x+rh rrrras{riJ rti r r 'vet n.ryrYlX U` y R �J ytkri a a J ryz'. y w •fat v.rt. t 1��f° . ®1i�. s ?t log y �niti.\� .=ET +,: ,f� � k�� "f. � �z i�lt! +-_r•��1}cltlthr 4. Y �rrrtru, „i Ai itay•. i li /I� .. � ��' �i}i',is r j'ax At�4�i�!. -ffA MY[ •6 11�1�'�-, f� '`:c!1+zi� .���„��' -r•`� + �ci� L��`FVs t'L.Jt ���LF3'� i (r j p d.l• r I ` i iN 1 40 �f NMM o o J; PL RTINC'DMSION LEMBr17' r��,` SCALE. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TNE-.CITY OF., RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI,FORNIA, MODIFYING THE DESIGN RESEW FOR. MAP NO. 12659-2 TO INCORPORATt' NEW BUILDING ELEVATION AND REVISE THE UNIT MIX FOR PHASE TWO OF A PREVIOUSrv, APPROVEP"" TRACT h;AN CONS?SI'm OF 135 SINGLE FAMILY LO'TS,ON 67.67 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY L94 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-.2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETNANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST MRRER OF ETI4ANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET, AND MAK?NG FNOINGS IN 'SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-111-38 KA, M A. Recitaa. (i) On November 13, 1985. the -Planning Comm ssion adopted; es,.lution No. 85-168, therein "approving, subject, to sp�r ,,fic ond,t ons, Tentative Tract Map No. 12659, which provides For.it(e"development of ` 136 single family lots and common 'tots on 67167 acres of land within the Very Low Residential , District Within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, (ii) On September 9, 1987, the '.Planning Corr-nission adopted Resolution No. 87-165, thereby approving, subject to ;`specific conditions, the Design,Review for Tentative Tract Map N.. ;14659. (iii) The above-described property 'is loved at the southwe3t corner of Etiwanda Avenue and :24th Street and is within the VL (Very Low Residential) District (iv) On June 14, 1989, a modification request was flee with the Planning Division for the incorporation of a new model (Plan 6) any; the revision of the unit',miR for Phase Two. ;v) On the September 27, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted 'a duly 'noticed public '.hearing on the applicati.an and cocluded said hearing on that date. (vi) All legal preregvisiter, to, the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. ''Resolution, NOW THEREFORE, it 'is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows. 1. This Comnissiaa hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth 'in the Reditals, Part All of this Resolution are true and correct. J �y Y PANNING. CQMASSION RESOLUTION NO '} 7T2283S.-Z 6tAttTQN September 27., 1989 Page 2 qP 2, 'teased xpon substantiai evidence presented to this Cd*mi* n during . the abovo4referenced public hearing 06 September 27, 158�, includi)ig. written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follo4s,: a: The proposed project IS consistent with,.t)50 o'"Jectives of the G�,�araI Plan, and b. �R,q prupe d Sodiflations t0, the des gn rare f n accord wit► the �` ;bjectives 6f the Etiwanda Sp_,oific. P}an and the purposes of the c district in whic�i she site is loceted and c. The proposed modificattons,to the design are in compliiuGe with each df the applicable provisipns of the E, wanda Specific Man, i and d. Fhe proposed modifications to the. design,>xbge er with, the conditions applicable. thereto, ,rill not be. detritkintal to the public health, Safety, or welfare,-.nr materially injurJus Lo properties. or imprcvemehts irr Cite �4icjYity. 3. This Commis$io- hereby finds and certifies tfiat the project has. been reviewed And" considered in compliance' with. the Califernia Environmental Qualit�r �=of 1970 arid, further, this CoMission hereby issued a Negat ve,Declaratior+ on November 33, 4 'Ka sed upgi the finilIgs and conch{-tuns set fprt4.1 in paragraph t, 2 end' above, this C6„OlSsion hereby approves the app 'anon subje;t to each and every conditicn set forth below: a. pl�'nninq Divisien; �1) VI the conditions Zppliedble fro!), Resolution# No. '87-15rr , shalI appty4 (2) Landscape/irrigation O;ans f4�- ;t11 fronf�,yards and .slope areas-p*cee�ng five ($) feet rn vertical'';hei0titshall be sobmittud far geview and appro al for the P. ann ng biv.i Torn prior to the issuance�pf buiid�ng permits for ail,remaining phases (2 throu;h 4). Fiti)nt yard lands:?ping shall include, at a minimum, four (4) 15Kga,Ion or .larger size trees ;T' :interior dots and 'eiDhti> (8) 15� II ; or larger r size.t, .:s on corner lct!4` SAM trees �hal1 be In add�iti"Jn tO red` ,red Streetl,�reeSx; S]ope planting shalt„4� shown Ott the Z';_.=,r3scatre ptAiis ih htcet r�iance with Section 17.00,040 �T) of the DevglopAen cDe,,. (3) Driveway approaches'shat'r;be reduced to,;,a,maximum, aridth of 4, feet,and driveway AeQthw;�shalI be4641!tced. vtitlrin front; yard,setbat ks'wherever` passible. "` r zr �r * ANN M x COFSMISSION MOl MON NO. 'TT12659"2 y %�ANTOK September 27, 1989 page 3 itionai wood tiding shall tie continued along the side of Plan provide more ,,,complete side �levat-ivti� articulatipn' (5) ,ASd.itianal art culatioO shall. be aa�taed to, the accent.. foatures o:� Pion f, such as, but not limited to,#ihimniys, cal mns found dos an windov , S. The Secretary to this~ Commission shall certify ,to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED:ANO ADOP'?E9 THIS 27r,'. PAY.OF, SDTEMBER', 1989. PLANNING COhN�KISSION WTNE 'CITY:.OF`',RANCNit`C�G�AMONGA !4 .: 4- Y, BY- Larry T. M.CNie1, Chairman ATTEST ' Brad Buller:, Secretary � '� I, Brad Buller, Secretary of tfie'.planoing. tommission .uf the City Of Rancho , Cucamonoa, do hereby certify ,that the foregoing, Resolution eas doly, and regulaety introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Cowi5sion of 'the rtty of Rt-ncho,Cucamanga; at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held p;t the 27th day of Septembei, 1989,, by tb�i f6t1o4ing vote-to-wit: AYES:: COMMISsION445z i r, NOES.. COM ISSIONENtt, ' 3EN -. COMMIONERS3, -Ct i r 0717 8 9; PAc o � CUT OF.RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT a DATE: Septenter 27 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad 'Buller, City Planner BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Planning Aide SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 89-04 - PEPPER-S MEXICAN RESTAURANT The review of providing hive entertainment in conjunction with restaurant~use, located at 9740 19th Street. I. ABSTRACT: In compliance with City. Council Ordinance (No. 290), which' requires any business entity to obtain a permit where entertainment is provided, the applicant is requesting review'and approval of an Entertainment Permit fora single musician or small music combo group_to, pl'aY soft jazz or pop music and to permit dancing, within their`,restaurant. II, ANALYSIS: Pepper's Mexican Restaurant.,is proposing to provide live entertainment and dancing three nights a-week, Thursday to Saturday, from 9:00',p.m. to 12:30 am.- .ntert0nment will he centrally located in the facility, kndno t dieission fee will be charged. Dancingwill be permitted in an area iihich totals 146 square feet. (See Exhibit "811). Per .the provisions of the Entertainment Ordinance Section 5.12.13091 a security guard is not required as the dance floor does not exceprt 150;square feet. Mr. and Mrs. Bhatnagar are the owners ai'rd managers of Pepper's t Mexican Restaurant, and will be responsible for the management of entertainment. The facility is a full service restaurant, offering alceh(wlic beverages such as beer and erne. In accordance with Section 5.12040 of the Entertainment Ordinance, the applicant has indicated that neither the applicant nor any persons >; responsible for the management or supervision of Pepper--s Wexican Restaurant has, within the previous ten years, been cor-victed of a crime nor has the applicant ever had any permit or li' nse issued in conjunction with the •sale of alcohol ;or the provision of entertainment revoked. Review-of the. Entertainment Permit must take into consideration lccational impacts and what mitigation measures should be included in the Resolution of Approval. Pepper's is located,,with'in a Neighborhood iCoinercial center with retail, office,, restaurant, and tenant use. Residential uses are 14cated approximately. 400 feet away from the proposed si:te� and their"-location should not ITEM 11 1AWW OMMIsslor� EP 89-04 - PEPPER'S MEXICP'�,,.RESTAURANT September 27; 1989, Page P 0 jw• cons'0tute a significant- fat tor. In addition, a significant, ourber of the tenants, ".approximately ninety percent, .will be closed during the hours Vie applicant is proposing to"" provide entertainment. (See Exhitiit "C"�. Sarah's Ice Cream Shop, Town"g,"_ Country,Liquoirs acid Stater E3rothers•Market are the.nuly businesses " to maintain •operating' hours during the proposed ere,sertainment;, hours. Therefore, there should` by m �frW inimal ecgative � s +n operations, conflicts, With adJareit businesses "and. the �Jrking� demand shoul.i' be Teiie than adequately met. In addition; given the. nature of the p.'dpvsed'" eri, rtaie�r�nt, noise wl] be:minimal as compared to such enterta*vnt as live disc Jockeys or 'disco music. The type of len ter 61"nrserat Pepper,'s Mexican Restaurant 3s proposing to prop*ide will cater to a mom,:mature,-clientele. Disturbances, such'as, those experienced with ('/arty C's should not accur, given the nature of the,type of entertainmint and facility. Should the operation of` this Entertainment, Permit cause adverse impacts upon adJacent businesses or operations it shal.l: be.brought before the Planning :Commission for the Consideration and possible suspension or revecation,cif the permit, in accordance Sectipn 6.12.100 of the Entertai(:A� nt Ordinance. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make the fog No. 89-� findings -in order to approve Entertainment Permit 9404. ; A. The- conduct of the establishment or the granting of the application wtjuld; notj be contrary to the public health, safety, morals,;or,'we]fhre. -8. The premises or iistab'lishment is not likely to.(oe operated in un illegal, impr�'jper, or disorderly manner. C. The applicant or any `ter person 'associated. with him as principal or psrtner., or in apposition or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of"the business for.` which such(, permit is sought -to be issued, has not., been convicted jn any court of 'competent Jurisdiction of arty offense involving the presentation4 exhibition, or performance of any obscene show of any kind, or of a,'felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude, nor has had any,approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction With the role of alcohol or the,'provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years. 0. That granting the application -would not create e a public nuisavme. t .5 PLANNING COMMISSIOn''STAFF REPORT'' EP 8944 - PEPPER'S ME�(ICAN RESTAURANT > SPeptember 27, 1989 E. That tine;moral operation of the premises would not interferer- with thee' peace and quiet "of, " any 'surrounding residential ne:ighborhood,. r, F. That the ;'applicant has 'bt rtiade any"false,=misleading,"or- . fraudulent statement`' o14 material "fact" in thee required application To the. best of staff"s knowledge,., there is no information to indicate anything, contrary'to 'these f i4j IV. RECOMMENDATIOFt• Staff `recommends that the Planning -Ccvmmission: -con it)ional y'a0rove;enterterinment Permit`,89-04 through. adoptign bf th't3_attached ite'stzlution of Approval. 't Res Ily s ed., Bra er- c( City PT nnerAM _ P:ALH:ml Attachments:; Exhibit ' _ - Site Plan' Exhibit 11W - Flcor Plank. ra Exhibit "'G" - Hours of 0l,etiow. ExHbit "�"" App_licatib,�` Exhibit "E" Letter from Applicant Resolution of Approval ; 4�1 1� I 0 vl q1 .�.._._SL_ `s w1 b O �.� ''�' •.�i,•,. fin": r� e S: wa ' �`.�• ��' � =:*� -i e � .;ram r a' a � ■ .; r r :+ • � �� e � R•u 1 1 x t t s, x c Fit , p Pam ' I��Y�AT TME. F L-90 t2 EXHIBIT. B SCALE' AJ � i� r 9740 19th St Proposed Hours of Entertainment: Thursday-Saturday 9ai4 pm-13:30 pm, Stater Brother Center Fours of Operation Cenhw 21 ' 9710 19tivStreet Mon:Ft+ 8:30 am-7:00 pm Sat.-Sun. 9.00 am-6 00 pm Stater BrothePs 975019th St; Mon.'-Sat. 7:00 am-10:00 prn Sun. 7:00 am-9:30 pm + Checkers Beauty Salon 976019th St. Dion.-Fria 9 0 am•9 00 pm Sat.-Sun. 9.00 am•6 00 prn Town&Cou kry Cleaners 976219th St Mon.-Fri. 7:00 am4:00 pm Sat, 7:00 am-5:00 pm Perry Chiropractic 9764 19th St. Mon.-Fri. 8:00.un-12.•00 pm/2:00 pm-6:00 pm Old Tyme Treasures 976819th St, Mon.,-Fri. 10:30 am-6 00;pm Sat 11:00 am-5:00 pm China Garden Restauarant 977019th St. Mon:Fri. 11:00 am-9r30 pm Sat.-Sun. 4:00 pm4:30 pm Dr.Sabicer " 977819th St Mon.-Th. 9.•00 am-6:00 pm Fria 9:00 am-10 pm I Best Video 97801:'th St. T.&Th. 11:00 am 8:00 pm Fri.&Sat+ 11:00 are-9:00 p;rs Sun. 11:00 am-8:00 pm Aiore Real:Estate 978219th St. Mon.-Fri. 9:00 an-6 C0 pm ' ;Fantast:..Sams 978419th St. Iv on.Fri. 9:00&31.840 pm Sat. 8:00 am-6:00 pm Sun. :"am-4:00 pm Sarah's Ice Cream 978819th St. Mon.-Th. 11:30 am-I.:0mmu,lri.&_sit_ 'in am.-10•Q.J F.m' Sun. 2,30 pm 10:00:pm Town&Country Liquors 979419th St. l,4on:Tht 7:00 am-10:00 pm Fri.&Sat. 7:00 am-12.00 am Sun. 8:00am-10-00 pm 11 Donuta Khmer I 979611119th St Mon:Fri. 4:am-2.•00 pm Sat:&Sun, 5.00 am-12.00 pm Southwest Savings' 979819th St. Mon:Th. 9..00 am-4:00 pm Fri: 9:00 am-6:00 pm CITY 0P. T4C . L3 A►PNIO 36:A 1'lEMt F L T 'G'D"I0N Ttt'LF:` Gte2S oA� ` t2 tk'f t�A4 Y rr• �- SCALE �►1� �� b wino F. RTAI TT> ERMrr AIPPLICATI01ML, Appllcanta for entmtatnm"t permits shall eompkte the following grrtstionad-e: PLEME PRINT OR TYPE, A. The name and permanent address of,applicant Per anent Address - -- � B. The name,proposed and current iE an,- , y,and business address of the applicant. Name(Current and T roposed) ----------------- easiness Address ' C. A detailed description of the proposed entertainment,indudinj tyke of —_--- entertainment,and number of persona engaged iat the entertainment(may attach seperate sheets if necessary); ---------------------------------------- - - - -- I --- ----------------------- ----------------------------- D. The date or day-9-wv]4 hours and laca2fon of enb�staintsi�t tattacti ElnorplanL and the adnil�ion f ,if any,,to b4 eharg+td: -- - - an.,--- -,=--- ---- -- ---- ---- ---i� .Q --- --- ------ --- - CI'T'Y OF i ANCHU-C€7OAMONGA ITEM:-'P 0 PLANNING DMSJON TM : A r?F4,I CATj Pam! f EXHIBIT: 1:> SCALE: tJLA r^ & The name(s)of the,person(s)'responsible for the management or supervision of applicant's business and of any er_tertninment i•. A statement of the nature a1d character of applicant s business;if any,to be ::arried on in conjunction with.such entertainment,inducting,whether or not alcohol will be served as part of such business: XLI,B A 1'8—,—914-4)kL G. Whether or not the applicant or any person responsible for the management or i supervision of applicant's business Wnie been,within the previous ten years, convicted of a crime,the nature of such offerm and:the sentence received*:erefor including conditions of parole!or probation,if as r _1vo R/ ------------------------------------------------------------ H. Whether ter not applicant t+as evew hsd any permit or license issued it conjunction with the sale of alcohol or proeisiox of entartainm'ent ttewoked, including the date thereof and;name oE;tbe revoking sgencp —1"-; &I& ------- — — --- -- -- — — — --- -------------------- ---------------- ------- ------------------- Any falwi mislsadfng or frWwlext statement of maatmal fact is UN regta reed application-$hall be gmw ds for dMial Of M4 applfcat ote f®r,nu extertdim ext permit. l CITY M RA-14C O CiX AIVIOIyGA :: 1"414 PLJ�N t I IOIV TM.F- -ApPt-i CA-r l PxI �= E%HIB,M 9 SCALE kI Mike & Jeanne thatnagar 15 August 25, 1989 8 Calle Renata an Dimas, CA 91773 City of Ranchu Cucamonga Planning, conaission Re: Entertainment permit, for PEPPERS RESTAURANT, 9740 19th St. Dear Sir/Hadam: Per your ..quest, the following is a brief resume on myself and my husband, Mike Bhatnagar. Mike Bhatnagar: He has been in the Hotel-Restaurant industry sin'e.197Q bath in Eurove Arid the. U,S,A. He has held"the position of Chef, Food & Beverage Manager, Hotel Manager an-*s is presently the Director of Food Services for a major food compaAy, Jeanne Bhatnagar: I'have been in the food industry since 1975.3n various states throughout the U.S. I have'held the position of Food & Beyera a manager and'Cater ing Director in various hotels and country clubs Presntly, Lam the a4-owner and operator o£'P.eppers. Restaurant and Lounge. 4is Regarding the Commissions' concern as to whether ;like or myslf;.�Till be present during, the hours the we will present entertainment and dancing, We are,altaays present i ne evening ours as we are the ones who must close down the restaurant and lounge every, etsing, orf ore, we see no problem there. Please feel free to contact us if you have any further .questinns. Sincerely, a ne Bhatnagar v� CITY OP O CB AA1ft7NGAL f-F . p PLANNIN 1)TWIaION B7EH�Brr. SCALE- 1 #� : qk RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION, OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CIT'��OF RANCH O ,CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA;; APPROVING E;NTERTAI'VENT PERKI7 89-04 TO ;r?ERATE AND :tt'ONDUC' EN, %- JAINME(i �'BY PROVIDING A MUSSI�` �Ny OR SMALL COMBO,.GROUP��AND.,'AN'CING WITHIN PEPPER'S MlXICAN RESTAURANT, LOCATED AT1/4O 19TH STREET, AND MAKItiG FINDINGS V.,'SUPPORT THEREOF. (fir A. Recitals. 1 , (i) On May 21,., 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No.` 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. (ii) On August 15, 1989, Jeanne Shatnagar filled for;-,art application for the issti# ice of an Entertainment Permit (EP 89-04) described above in the title of this Resolution.. (III) On the '27th 'day of September, 1989;' the :Rancho• Cucamonga Planning Commission held. a public hearing ,to:' consider the above-described pr fect. �I j 6, Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comnissicn resolves as follows: 1. This` Commission hereby specifically finds thi t all the facts set forth in the recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true:and correct,; 2. Based+-'*aeon substantia'Y�evidence- presented to this Commission during the above-referenced September't, 1989 hearing,, including the written staff report, ,k d the written, signed verified application of the applicant, this Commission :hereby specifically finis as follows: (a) 7he- application applies to rop`~rty located on the northeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue :on. a lot presently improved with structures and parking which constitute a Wighborhood Commercial Center, and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is. a vacant parcel, to the south is a banking facility and a fsst'food restaurant, to the east is a Medium-High Residential use, and to the west is a vacant parcel and a Low-feedium'Residential use. (c) Pepper's 'flexican Restaurant is a full service restaurant serving alcoholic beverages such as beer and wine. The proposed entertainment will be provided three nights a week, from Thursday to saturday evenings' il c , rf � ^ ) 0 ____ _ 4�I:�tN�lINt3°�ti�{MTSSb(!iV`RE$QL[ITION 0. EP 89R04 - MPPERS' PFXICAN R91Z11, September 27,; 1989 Page 2 r; from 9:00 pm. to °12:a4 a.m. ` Ali entertainment wi�l;l be centrally located within the facility, artd no admission fee still be charged. Dancing will be permitted in. a dance.Area which totals 146,square feet. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comnissi6n during the above-referenced Septeaber 274 1989.. public hearing and upon the specific findings. of facts tet``forth in, paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a)' That the conduct of the establishment or the granting of the application would be not contrary to the public health, safety, Morals, -'or welfare, and , (b) That the' premises 'or establishment are not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper, or disorderly manner; and • (c) That the applicant has not had any approval, permit,; cr license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol] }or the provision of ente+tainmeni revoked within the preceding five years ,W (d) That granting the application v;ouuld not create a public nuisance; and (e) That the normal operation of the' premises would not interfere Am with the peace and quiet ,of the surrounding neighborhood Commercial Center; and (f)- The applicant has not made any false, misleading or fraudulent stater^ent of material fact in the required application 4. Based upon the findings and 'conclusions set form a ;Aragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the applicat ion subject to the following conditions: (1) This approval is for. a single `musician or small combo (34;piece) to play jazz or soft pop music. .Any 'chauuge-of intensity of type of entertainment shall require, application for modification of this ' permit. (2) Oanci'rig is permitted on a dance floor area 'which doe ;not exceed 146 square feet. (3) If the operation' of En ertainment Permit causes any adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Entertainment Peratit shall 'be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible suspension or revocat,on of the permit. a `PLANNIING ComArSQON RESOLUTION`N4.. cP 89-04 - PEPPERS' `MEXICAN RESTAURANT q " Septeiiber 2 , 1989: Page 3 _l (4) boors.- shall remain closed when entertainment is. being condicted for noise attenuation purposes:. (5) Hours of operation of the entertainment-'use shall be Thursday through Saturday, 'from 9*00 p.m. to 12.3001 ( ) nter t h builde te ing unless written `consent is obtained from, all adjoining tenants in conjunction with the Temporary Use Permit application"process. (7) The Entertainment Permit: shall not commence until " such time as all U'niformi Building Code. and State, Fire;, Marsh alIIs regulations have been ;complied with. Plans shall be submitted to thi Rancho Cucamonga fire Protection District and-the Building and-Ztafety Divisi;cin for review-and approval' rig E to commencement of any entertafinent activity.' (8) Any silo imposed shall be d4-signed in conformance with thbe Uniform Sign ProgramGnd the City'ss Sign Ordinance. Plans for the proposed wall signs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to installation of ,such signs �-d /! prior to commencement of the entertainment activity. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER,`'1989, PLANNING COMMISSION,,OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR " BY: Larry T. r�WNW, Chairman ATTEST° r brad Buller, Secretary �� A�- PLANNING CCIr`A15SION ktWLu ;lutt 14a ER 89-Q4 - PEPPERS`-MEXICAN' RESTAURANT Septembtir 2.` 198 Page 4 ' 7fi'^ I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of' Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Re_solutijin was duly and regularly, roduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning (�ommissior, of the City of Rancho;yucamonga, at a regular meeting of the'Plarnirjg Coertfission held on the 2Ath day of SeptemberC1989, by the following voteit' wit: AYES: CDMMISSIONERS: NOES: MSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: [; � a AM n tf� - v �i3Y4r#�`Cd-t'� RANCHO,INC. ] SEP 25 1981 f 1, 97t4 t'92ftStreei Alta Loma,CafifomiaS1701 x P Vancho Cucamonga i' arming Commies oij - 9340 Baseline goad Unit 8- Rancho Cucamonga, Ca., 91701 Re: Public Iearinaa Entertainment Permit 89-04 Pepper's Mexican Ste"stauram` ; Dear Sirs, I am voicing a concern over the possible issuance of the Above entertainment permit'. MY busine4s is next to Pepper's Bar. Unfgrtunate hlisiness is not c pl:itrle with this ousiness, ,St `641 1+�iUT' T t'1V t-S G t'�� '11 z f „ Cc�+zi G IS 04g, Wir If an entertainment permit is. issued, t wit,c3� se 0 At present with the restaurant and bar parking is a problem. Sometimes we canna^, find Fax'ring,'1et axone our cl£eizts. Parking gill become even more of a problem. sib awk e*v ; �t1�'l T !S` 3M 4Pr Tot =3ta�rj r aflit" Yo 7:ssisP.t1 ra -� 1?cise is a problem nptr, Fie have bad our�r nsul,ated, bttt s i i can a,r i.- the IoO music .from the radio. what will, it be like,vit4 live entertai=eht2 Gince, taost of the agenl:s °are ':omen, security is a-concern. He still, have fights and drunks nor. I am sure this will ilicrease.00ra�iderab33. Vandalism in the parking tat in the evening hours has now" also been added to our list of problems,; I am -voicing a strong objection to the issuance Of this permit. 5 naerely, -Dee Argo %I Broker Cent ury 21 Rancho ksoh QfhGe�s9a epertfeafr Ownedavd.Qpemfed r ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUQAMONGA STAFV.REPORT S. ,r DATE: September 27, 19�;� TO: Chairman and Mar ers of the Planning Commission FR0M4 Biad Buller, City Planner ' BY: Nancy'Fonp, Senior Planner:,,.. Debra Meier, Planning Consultant SUBJECT: MODIFICATION,-TO CONDITIONAL. USE, PERMIT 88.42 - WESTERN PROPERTIES - Proposed various minor revisions to, he site plan and.Cut'.cing design of A previously approved 71-acre shopping cen'te�r.f (Terra Vista 'Town Center), ,that involves' such items ,as adJustment to 'on-site curb line, 'combination of buildings into one,"shifting of building .orientation to' Provide view corridor, . ar,hitecturai enhancement for ;f building edges, etc.,s for,, property, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avein and Foothi"l Boulevard in the Community Commercial, DiiidCtL of the Terra Vista. Planned GomrunAity - APft 0.77-42r=051,,06, stnd i�. -.,,._ I. ABSTRACT: The modification is regvzsted to receive approval of :various site revisions that have occurred'- through the, Design 'eview of Major ,Z;`(Mervyn's), and MaJ6, 3 (Montgomery Ward). The site plan was veViewed.by the Planning_.Comnission at an adjourned meeting on Jul, 6s,--1989.' The Commission directec('"staff to prepare a resolutic:i of app-�Dval for the site plan subject to cep'a'.in f conditions. The resolution is attaeited fo)• form action by $nh_ l Commission. i II. BACKGROUND: The revisions to the approved s.te plan included the following: A. Modification of Major 2 to incorporate the i'�et vyn's store. B. ;Adjustments to retail shop,.building edges of Buildings B and E, adjacent to MervynI's. C, C.djustments to Buildings 'S' e P to create a. view co�ridor for s Mervyn,I s. D. Adjustments to the surrounding ,curb lines behind Mervyn's, including the creation of additional parking and another driveway to be used as overflow parking for the-Theater. o' ITER E U, PLANNING CONiMISStON STAFF REPORT, � CUP 08 12, - WESTERN PROPERTIES'` ')ept6 '97, 1989 - E. ' The e`;iMination of Buildings T and M to create greater viss`,il`ity of°;Target,and Mervyn's.= I F. The combining of Buildings E & T and G & H_into single -- buildings by deleting interior- open-air corridor. V, G. The incorporation of' Montgome"r'y Wand into 06sition'o€ Major 3. H. Adjustment to retail shop bu%ldi6q,'edges of Buildings'.K & L: adjacet.to Montgomery Ward- I. The incorporation of a Tire/Batt erylAccessofx (TB,'j facility' for Montgomery Wa~ : oj3ucrnC is Major d.,. J. 'Miscellaneous aQustmehts of various :curb.lines and__�1.riveway location to accommodate the Montgomery Ward',aca k K. Parking area north of Building ,A I movofl b south of Building A 2.'-0 L. Adjustm"% to the orientation of the theater, the theater court, and the Westerly parking lot including the alignment of the driveway. III. DESIGN REVIEW., At the uuly 6, 1989 Review workshop, the Commission; approved the general revisions to the .site plan, subject to the folloWing conditions which :have been included in the re- :ution., ;t ! 1. A0' ;icy footpr'ht depicted on the site plan that has not re4., £-sigro Review approval by the Planning Commission' shall bonsidered conceptual in nature. 2. At the tii;e of Design Review of Buildings S and P the inelusian of perimeter trallis and landscape features should_ be incorporated" into the architectural design, to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission.. ' 3. The rear -elevation and service areas of Buildings E; and G-.mast be designed to the satisfaction of the-Planning .Commiss;,on.: An krpearance of a building frontage sh; 1d continue a;ount3 the rearof the building as much as possible. " The final r design, including 'footprint, service area screening, a1ic iandscaaing, must be resolved during the Design Review of these too tiui I'd i`ms. ''"Vq( S iL `•`, t, jf ( 1 J C� PLA'N"YNU CVAMISSIM,l ,STAFF(REPORT CUP.-88-1 - WESTIM�l PROPORM.- ES S'eptertber 271ii,1589. Page 3 i peetiaalkway �tib Ugh the building4. n near Mon qo - nidorskgr - hali be � designed 40 the satisfaction,of the Planning, Commission during "Design Review of y� RespP t�ly submitted B L I 7 City,Pl anner r; BB:NF:sp Exhibit t'A" Site Fran shewing iocatidhs;,of ad3usi;s nts and mbdjfications Resolution of Approval ; I ` J 4 y^ 11 Bdd RA._RR S A`.9R � YQffR (rr golf * file SR•RA�. n` SA_kkAR �.. f... ` r _$fit .r r L=:D 1 �� RESOLUTION,NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USF ,PERMIT, NO. 88-12 PROPOSED ,VARIOUS<MINOR REVISIONS TO 714£ SITE FLAN AND BUILDING DESIGN OF A PR£VIOUSLV. APPROVFD 71-ACRE F SHOPPING CENTER {TERRA' VISTA TOWNE,CENI THAT INVOLVE SUCH ITEMS'' SAS -ADJUSTMENT TO ON-SITE CURB' LINE;, COMBIATION OF7 $UILDTtsC5-.IN(0._DNE.� SHIFTING 'OF BUILDING ORIENTATION TO, PROVIDE VIEW CORRIDOR, ARCHITECTURAL. ENHANCEMENT FOR BUILDING ;EDGES,, ETC., FOR.` PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1HEPiUFITHEAST CORNER CF HAVEN AVENUE AND iw F007HILL BOiILEYRRD IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL .DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANED'COMMUNI'Y AND MAKING FINDINGS SO! SUPPORT THEREOF, -,APNs 1677-421'46 00, AND.13 A. Recitals. (i} On April '27, 1.9880 this Commission adopted its: Resolution No. 88-76 thereby approving,°sugject to specified conditions," a community shopping center on 71 acres of land in the Comriynity Cowercia? District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, 00 Western Properties has filed an application for the modification I of the Conditional Use; Permit No, 89-12 as, described iq the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter . in this 'Resolution, the sub3ect Conditional Use Permit request is referredtc as "the application".. (iii) On the, 6th of July, 1989, the Planning Commission conducted a Design Review workshop,at an. adjourned meeting to :discuss the design aspects . of the revised. site plan; and (iv) On the 27rd of September 198 , the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted` a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date„ (v) All legal prerequisites to the adrption of this Resolution have ' occurred. 8. Resolution, NOW, THERUORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning 'Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Tkis Coremission hereby specifically finds that all' of•the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A; of'this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Cowission during the above-referenced public hearings on July 6, 1989 and-Septet er 27, 1989, includ£Yig, written and oral ' staff reports, together with, public testimony; this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: PLANNING COMMISSI9NYRESOLUTION NO. CUP 88-12 - WESTERN:PROPERT11S September 27, 1989 Page 2 1 a. The application` appineC "to _ property located at r: northeast corner of Haven, Avenue and Focthe(1 Boulevard'with..a street frontage of ±2,700 feet andt_1or c(e�rth 'of ±1,q'4l0 feet and is presently in various sta9es of construction, arri f :;' b, -The"proji„rty to the north of .the-sUb3ect site is :an office complex under construction 'the p roperty to the South of that',site.,Consists of an office complex,;the property to the east is vacant land and the property to the west is an entertainment/office Complex. 3. Based upoh tile substantial ;evidence presented. to'`this Commission during the above-refer..nced public hearing and' upon the s�ec;ific f :nd.ings of facts' set 'forth in par` graphs 1 and 2 above, 'this Commission`hereby finds:and concludes as follows. a. That the proposed use is 'in accord with the General Plan, the objectives 'of, the' Development Code, and' the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. That the proposed 'use,. together with"'theconditions applicable thereto, wilt not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to ;'properties or I proveiuents`� in the vicinity. - co That the proposed u.se complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance. with the California Er�vironmental Quality Act of 1970 and, •further, this Commission hereby, issued a ,Negative Declaration on April 13, 1989. , 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs i, 2, 3, and 4i4bove., this Comm issIon';ereby approves the application subject ta each and eviry condition set forth below. Planning Division 1. ill pertinent, Conditions `. of Approval as 'contained in Resolution Nos. 88-75, 88-11.8, 88- 236, and 88-236A shall ap'01;- 2. Any buiidi rig--footprint depicted on the site plan th.it r s not received Design Review approval by the Planning Commission, shall be considered corciptual in nature. 8. At the time of D`e�,ign;Review of Buildings:S and r F, the inclusion ,`,hf perimeter 'trellis and landscape features shall be incorporated into the archiiectural design,, to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission.; Y PLANNINd'COMMISSION,.RESOLUI,IUK Nu. ti CUP 88-12 =`WESTERN PROPERTIES September 27 1989,< Page-3 c 4. The rear, elevation andsevice areas of Buildings E and G shall be designed to the satisfaction �o€ the•Planning, Cor►rnission.> An _ ;appearance of a building frontage shall continue the -rear of the=:building .as much as possible.4- The final design, including fdotpririt, service "are .'screenings °and landscaping, shall be resolved 'during the Design Review of these two buildings. 5. A pedestrian walkway %shall be provided through :the building near Montgomery,Ward and Zuilding K. The corridor -shalI-be designed to, the satisfaction of the; Planning ,;onm` ion during Design Rnview of Building K:7 , .a Eng ineerinq�Division 1 < veway location addustmeht ' -shown on, the nfied site plan, are acceptable, subject to the fgl loving;. ;> a) The easternmost driveway "on Town Center, Orive shall be 'relocated westerly ;'such that the east edge of rom-xh the ew��;;ray is a minimum .of 200` feet fe. SCR for Spruce Avenue, b) The, northerly driveway on Haven Avenue' shall be separated from the southerly driveway by a minimum of 300 feet, measured at•driveway center lines; and c) The southerly driveway on Haven Avenue :<hatl tonfora, tg City %aur►ci Resolution 2 _ All "applicable Undscaping and street ovement plans shall 4e revised to reflect :�imprhe driveway ;relocations and approved by the :City Engineer;prior to final map amendment, issuance of building; permits, or issuance. of encroachment permits, whichever occurs first. 3, Parcel ;Pap 11030-shall be amemled to bring all non vehicular, accesses and ingress,/egress easement locations into conformance with the Conditional Use Permit as modified. r� �` W _ PLA NING I, CUPN38-12C-WESTERN PKIPERTIES,.-.- 1 September 27, 1989 Page 4 6. T,tie Secretary'to this CoWission shal1,certi -y to the adoption of this.Resolution. -4 of APPROVED AND ADOPTED THI ,27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1989. PLANNING COMISSION"OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: - Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST. - Brad Sul Ter, ecretary I. Brad Butler, Secretary of the Planning Comrlssion of the City 'of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cert`;fy that the foregoing-Resolution Was .duly and regularly introduced9 passed, and adopted b� the Planning GonAlse;Jd4 of the , . City of Rancho Cucamonga-, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27fh day of September 1989 Py the following vote-to-Wit: AYES: `COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS, ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i� ffff11 raj " CI1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 27, I08 TO: Chairman and Member's of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMEND;IENT 89-02E - CITY OF.R CHO;CUCAMONG A request to amend ,section 'IV, Environmertal Resources, and, S uct on V- Public Safety, elements of the General Plan _as they relate to hilis;ide development and' grading anq r'i" invol+e revising the, I. definitions of hillside, from IN percent or greater to 8 . percent or greater, as well as �Iestricting development' on slopes which are 30 percent or greater. Staff recommends that General Plan Amendment 89-OZE be withdrawn froti � consideration_by the Planning Cocrmission at this time: I. ` Staff`s original intent was to 'sctt�dule the General: Plan Amendment, proposed Hillside Ordinance;and neces�sa�ry Development Cade revisions for . -concurrent review in this current General Plan review cycle. However, due to concerns raised by members of` the Etiwanda North Consortium' at' !. the Planning Commission Workshop of A4ust 30, 1989, the draft Hillside Ordinance may be subject to further revision and is not 'ready for consideration at this time. it is unknown. exactly when the proposed Ordinance will be ready for review, since the E-,iwanda North Consortium has not provided comments, in accordance with the previously committed' `r- two week response time (see attached letter dated September 19, 1989);: In order to prevent the possibility for the creation of inconsistencies between the City', .Generai "Plan and Development Code, staff recommends that this Amendment be withdrawn for consideration at a later conjunction with the proposed Hillside` Ordinance and Deve7l�me-- Code Amendments.- ;.._ Re c ul su ad B" r Ci ann f 3B:CN:ko ITEM F Ak CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Past off m Baa e07.Ranch.t ueamonsa,Cahfarn a 9t729,t7141 4s4-tskt. September 19,- 1989 Joe Di Iorio P.O.. Box 216 South Laguna, CA. 92677 SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DEVELOt?IMENT COMMENTS'_ Dbar Mr. Di Iorio: This letter is being sum as a follow-up on comments made regarding review of hillside develt:+wmeat standards at the Planning Commission work shop 'on August 30, 1989. , , At the conclusion of the"workshop, it was agreed 'that members of the consortiumaalu review the City's Hillside Development Ordinance for compatibility with concepts proposed in the Etiwanda North Specific ,Plan and rrovide'written comments to :staff within two weeks. The purpose of the review is to provide a written assessment qualifying and quantifying those areas where it is felt the Ordinance would hinder 'propo,zd development, and to present alternative standards and/or guidelines which are in keeping with the cty's goals and, policies with regard to Hillside Development. It has now been more than two weeks sAnce the Planning Commission workshop and staff has not received yobs_review coiiIments. Please be aware that a delay in getting these comments in results in staff being unable to schedLIe a follow up workshop at times previous mentioned. Howeveri please be assured that staff .Will tontinue to work with you to ensure that once comments are submitted that they will receive a timely review. Should you have any questions, please da not hesitate to contact,myself or Cindy t-irris. ;A Sincerely, COMMuNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION e Larry Henderson, AIC P Principal Planner LH:CN•js l'vann�hr� Ci U' Vexu %viiliam I Ak%4nder Char[ev r.Burl%10 If -' [Dennis L.'Stout DeberAh Id.Brown ramelA J.WnSht )aek LAm,AiCi' J Hillside Developmw Comments $eptember_ 9, Page 2 '1t J - cc: Jess Harris, Land/Plan Desl4fr Cindy Norris, Associate P1a1nrr Miki Aratt, Associate P'lanne, f Brad Bulier, City Plo�ner Chair, an & Members of the Plan�,Ahq Commission y i f x —'CITY OF RANCHO CU-CAMONGA STAFF REPORT f . DATE- September, 27, 1989 TO: Chairman and M60bers of he Planning Commission FROM: I Brad Buller,, City Planner ` BY: Cindy Norris„ Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN 41ENOMENT 89-02D AN V L N N Y - A-request to, amend the Land Use. ement Of the Genera Ala» from Flood Control to Civic/Community for 3.15 acres of land, located on the north side of Banyan Street, 6ast. of the Deer Creek Channel - APN: 201-191-24. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT - N -AGNY - A request to amend the Development. Districts Map from Flood Control to Low Residential (2-4 dtmlling units`per acre) for 3.15 acres of land, located on the north side of Banyan Street, east of the Deer Creek Channel - APN: 201-191-24. RELATED FILES: CONDITIONAL USE PERttIT 89-24 AND PARCEL 12779 11 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surround in 'and Use and Zonin North - vacant; o ontro - South - 'Single family>homes under construction;..{4-8 ►��dFiing chits per acre) East V�(cant; Flood Control West - Sitgle family homes under construction; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) B. Genera'. Plan Desi na�tiiU,s�: Project Site - Flood Control North -' Fbod Control South - Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East Flood Control West - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) ITEMS f H J PLANNING C4&iSSION?TAFF REPORT ODA 89-05 - RANCHO, CUCtM_NGA�,REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Septerilber 27, 1989 Page 2 ' C. Site Characteristics: The subject site is vacart with an approximate slope of 4-1/2 percent: from north. to south. :The Deer Creek Channel abuts the west property boundary �Iith Banyan Street adjacent to the south. In addition to this General Plan/Development` District Amendment request, the City is,also processing Conditional'Use Permit Application 89-24 and Parcel Map 12779 for this project site. II, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: cStaff;has reviewed; the .Initial Study Part I and completed the Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has found that no significant environmental Impact will occur as a result -of the proposed General Plane. Amendment 89-02D and 'Development District Amendment DOA 89-05., III. LAND USE ANALYSIS; "The requested amendments propose a land"use change from Flood Contrpl (FC) to a P:,s;�i'c Facility designation of Civic/Community and a` Development�`Tiistrict change from Flood Control to Low Density Residential. '3blic 'facilities are a conditionally permitted use in the Residential District, The proposed Land Use/Development District Amendments have been reviewed for ,consistency w.it!ahe ,General Plan, need for public facilities, and compatibffity with �5,u.rroundiny Land Use, Consistency The provision for adequate levels of service of a public facility, Including fire protection, is identified in the goals and _objectives of the Public Facilities and 'Public Safety elements of the City's General Man. As specifically stated in the Public Safety element, "...the health and well-being of the Commnity and the physical ;safety of- its:structures-shall be saftquarded." ; Figure V-.7 of the General Plan, Fire Hazards and, Fire Stations, indicates. the approximate future locations for new Fire Station facilities (Exhibit "C"). The locations are not intended to be site specific, but to be an indication of possible future need that may be ,adjusted over time as the City develops and as new information beco7es available. Need The need for public facilities has increased as a result of tha" rapid growth in the City, particularly with regard to Fire Protection Service. The Redevelopment Agency, together witn' the Fire Department, has developed a {master plan fo7 40etopment of s x Ai PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF'REPORT` ODA 89-05 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY September 211, 1989 Page 3 S fire 'stations. (Exhibit "E"). The master plan is cased on the achievement of adequate response times within eac` ` ned service area arm' the provision of safe levels of covera§,j iu all parts of the City as well As the-"sphere areas. Each station's service area As approximately, three (3) miles in- diamater and the proposed ) service level_ is an attempt to reach, ninety (90)..percent of tNe calls within five(5') minutes. 'Wherefore, as the location of future fire stations is dependent upon the established locations of nett and Existing facilities; it..is. apparent that a station is necessary in the immediate area of the subject property in,order to ensure adequate coverage. ;° , Compatibility The proposed land use is compatible•with the surrounding, la?%"-:ses in the area.; The:requested facility is.•located in tae no_•_,,:ern portion of the City in which the majority of the lend uses are lower density, single family resikntial, with tha` exception of the flood control<properties 1C'�ted directly to, tiie north and east, and the Deer' Creek,'Flood :Control` Channel, which abuts,, the west boundary,. Exhibit "A"', The residential lands are currently under c6hstructior and have beer, designed with a rear-on configuration to Banyan Street and property boundary Walls. Additionally,,-'Banyan Street is a. Designated residential collector which has restricted points of a:cess,.thereby allowing adequate ingress, and egress.. Potential traffic and other use conflicts, including noise impacts, should be a�4quately mar igated. The Flood Controli District has detet,mined that U& subject property is not necessary for flood („antrol purposes, as Deer Creek Channel located to the west, 1.1ias been improved and a siltation basin its to be, constructed east -of'the: site. Flood protection measures, to protect the .site from flows from the north, will be required with the related development proposal.. IV DEVELOPMENT 'DISTRICT ANALYSIS; , State law `requires that the Development District, i.e., aping Ordinance, be. consistent-with the General 'plan %fiction 65860 Government Code). If findings can be made to' ' warrant the General Plan Amendment ,to Civic/Community �-facilities, then, similarfindings should also be made regarding the Development District .Amendment change to low Density Residential in which public` faci:6ties are conditionally permitted. I G i PLANNING C"iSSION STAFF REPU RX t RADA 89-05 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY September 27, 1989 Page 4 V. 'FACTS: FOR, FIt;DINGS: In,vr,°der to approve the .General',Plan and. oev ; eiepment. District' A4eit6 nts; the Commission would have + determine 'that, the change would promote the land pose goals. a'nd_ policies, of the. General Plan land not be matq�ially,detrime!ital to; s the adjacent properties or cause s,'ignii`�cant`adverse environmental~ impacts. Folls,,?ing are the findings that are.nerassary: 1. The property, is suitable for the use propnsea, asr;t has been designated surplus by the Flood Control District- and will oe..adequately protected,from flows firom the . rorth as determined by the Enginandeer;trirI Divisi6-',y-as :a hydrologic anaisUs result of. ;h ' Y 9 y 7 ;proposed flood ; protection measures; and 2. . The site is of adequate size 'arA shape to riee, all development standard requirements, as-'evidenced by i s design of the related development p,6sai, CUP'89-24, and {. ,. 3. The site will have adequate, ac6�,ss to .accommodate the proposed use, based, on, compatibi1"•ty withh the'adjacent residentiaT cull::ctor street and proposed future roadwav improvements, and - 4. The proposed 'm;e is compatibli,:°with existing anc��uture land 'uses in the area, 'as- land to the`north `and- east wJ11 be used ,for flood control,, ptirposes and the residential. properties to the west andY-south have been designed in a marner which minimizes puss-';ble use conflicts; and 5. The proposed; amendments wiil not have 0!!rificant � impacts on the %environment nor the. surrounding - proper ties..' as evidenceo by,the conclusions and `findings of the Initial Study Part II; and 6. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the General Pion, as evident by the 'ability` of the proposed land use designation to satisfy, the stated goals,. objectives, and policies contained in the documents; and 7. The proposed, amendmmts are in 'conformance With the policies and, objectives contained within the Development Code, as evidenced.by-the ;ability of the proposed site , to meet development standards. rtisSJAI1 5IF1F1 REPORT i qoA t3s-05 Rr1NCF!A CUGAI�f�NCiR R®EVELOPVMNT AGENCY ` Ji September 27> 1989 Page 5 r _ V1. COMESpot&4cE. 3hi item has .been aduer isad as a" public hearing in The oailg ,Report ne+Y�spaper,; the_, proPerty :posted yritS a sppOementav large notification sign,' and notices sent to 'sit . property owners 'ithin,,300 feetrof the project site. f VII. RECQhI�lENO+�TOPi Staff recoronend5 that the Planning ComtsisSipn adopt the attached`Resolution. �rscomrnep�i*3 approval of G�Fteral Plan Amendwiit 89-02D and D;evelopmcom [liotr c i Ameridmeni. £9a,'0 to ` . the City CCU_nci-1 and issuaAce of-aNegatiye declaration Res tftlly tied,, Brad r City anner wt BB:CN-,ilg 4 Attachments:' Exhibit "A" - 15604ral Plan' Exhibit "B".- Vicinity sand Locat.ior Map E`xMb.it "C" - General Plan Figure M4. Exhibit ,'D" - Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Fire Protection Faciltties.Aaster Plan ' R6solutloh or Approval for. GPA 89-02D., Resolution of Approval for LoA.B945' h ._.... _.__._._ — _ 4}M --rn — _ _ _ r j Chaffey • - _ _ n'� 6•ll • Y•i L ��Ka a' • — .uses •• will IM •' .... ... :Fj-j 1 • ' ti • e ,°� •�'Wsp r.. ...... CITY ;f�Jyk��'RA-N�pC�HG ICCUI CTA{���rIONGA 1tTE . EXHIBIT SCALE;, � �9t 49G12 48.6 AC. , rj9 ri yr /g•gC•F.C',p. Par.2 2 bm 19.66AC C ! t r AgCk 3K 4. 0 1� "♦ Qk iT l r ♦ ♦ 4LL1 how /V x !�}• ♦.• 5.87E AC: a /to5� n mat, S v o.; 4} A t J' CITY €?F 1[ ANCH 3,'C[7CAffl JNGA i E1fF iurr: scALE: � � 1 eE i w D Q � o RE c.� y 4d Ii W A J � G o ally Li ui _ 1 ids � nr.u4ra j 1 1 ego.Me4v / aawe 1 :d:.: ' ..........� 10 ; M.rllrar r,✓� � o �. 1 4•.t i3ii 1g��,(, i •Wll.a � a R. 1 i dLL k Fire Bata® ggX18 MO'ANR igOVOaeO '� 20HWo:IIxa02NTtAL ",,F.—a WT Vo Aft exaTaa Axti 1 rnoroato ' 20lqp<10:QoRQaC;MiO/� 1 UNOOC VAcAgi ' CITY OF CUCAMONGA TI'EM PLANNING,DIVISION tr, EXHIBM SCALE: �� 14 [ n. i� 6rt 3. anv s g gr raa t w o r.2 LU 1 rr!YJl J II � lr, r::ryT,:r,7f.7r.riti';:'.• 1! I ( T�pY�rr�f•""fir t 7�}�R XJ!✓rr J7� SrT Q rr..'T.� �r I ?' :•'•:::,::^::r trrYr Ul Y J.t r, "1. it 3Ab d$Y3 I �'r J 7 r r J frfl r 1 xrJ �:J 1N rRfi f JT 'tr,. ! f6i(s 1 t j tlf!J+ r t J. J yS' frrjyr�d, ti�l� 1 J :r Y r + J ;r IL•I 1JJ j+ft ,J• +•T fir'J '7+ Tyr Jt S.+ ,;mot r fY S rT S sSJr Jrr rLN r/J 1 t nr zJf.+tr:S '�I f}.+r✓rt�y�.f Jti�� +w:''.! � 1 `, T •l r rir' �� ..tRJ�lrl Jr .'1•r'l.+fyl."t':Jf.'d"•r r -. MUM aw '1 J r � J. N•�N '�.r rT r r r S' h ] N r'�,. Jrr }J. tr rl r.rtY tr rr rJ �'r�i3tiY 1 � r tr Trr7t•t�u 1 r}}J, t I,tJJ' '1:i'": JG:',TJ+ �1�} } }J }J 1 �y�/ ?r rr ! S�•�. Nr TNN }Tr,l,:7 Y J R f +7 JN'•:f . - li}i}`r•':1L N. 71J f•{T Trs !Y`+S `,}, 'i::r}J r: r +r T r H J.r X..,.• L•,Y?}r 1 r..'r,?i'''.•1,',;�'o-?:. �'i���rT.i W �i f 1{N3S{fl'IIiR( ° r 7r ,rr ,arr rY 4® I r r r N1 J 11t>� it rrS p r x sr:j !r T r J rJ S 1 _ �... j !Jr rr tl r�J r Y 1•'K Q it OGCCD� �.� .rr J: J Jt r^J S��i ` M. r Q s:�r��='`e.'+`+r:J��� '�' s� rr'_ N 4 •+' N ZY:tq 1 J Y.rr.Yi ?.:....r I'f y;•'i @ .n��r'�e r �:s r �r.r� � .���, 1 :%?�"7Yi��•;' .}r � `�3 tir a x L J i i r•Ji' OC®a . i ..+ ,Iy •My 3l�04ia. p r 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION .OF THE PLANNING COWIM5ION OF THE CITi'OF RANCHO ;CUCAMONGA. .CALIFORNIA, RECbhAENDING APPROVAL AF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02D REQUESTIM'10 AMEM THE r GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM •,FLOOD CONTROL to CIVIC/COMMUNITY FOR 3.15 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON TCtF'?, NORTH SIDE. OF BANYAN STREET, EAST OF THG.C.tER CREEK FLO(:eI COt?1ROl.CHANNEL., AND.MAKING FINDINGS;IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 201-191-2R. A. Recitals. L (`i) The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment .Agency has filed an application for General Plan Amendment .No. 89-02D, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to.As "the applip#i'on" (ii) On September 27, 1989,`the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a du'',y noticed public hearing on the application (iii) All le al prerequisites to the. adoption of this Resolution have orcurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found: determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commiss?on hereby specifically finds that al1,.of the facts set forth in Recitals, Part "A'.', of this Resolution are true and Correct., 21 Based' upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced ,public hearing -on September 27, 198% including written and oral staff reports, 'togetheo' with public testimony,. this 'Commission herebt specifically finds as follows: (a);. The application applies to a➢aroximately 3 1b acres of land, in basically a,t00angular configuration, .'seated on the north side of Banyan Street, east of"th!� Beer. Creek Flood Control Channel and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Flood Control; and (b) The property to the north of, the subject site is designated Flood Control and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is under construction. The property to the east is.designated Flood Control and is vacant. The property to the south is designated Low Medium Residential (4-8 dweliling units per acre) and is under construction; and i s: PINANINirCO*iissiuh RESQU(PION N& GPA 89-02D 5epterfier 27, 1989 Page fi (c) This amendment does „not' conflict,-'With , the 'Land Use Policies of the General Plan and Will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with re lated development; and, (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) The property is suitable -for the use proposed, .as it has been designated surplus by the Flood Control District and will be ad(4,uately protected from flows from the north as determined by the Engineering Division as a-result of hydrologic ana:ysis(-id proposed' flood protection measures;,_and A, (f) This amendment would riot, be materially 1,injurious or', detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the. environment nor the surrounding properties and issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended; and (g) The proposed ;end use will have adequate access based on compatibility with the bordering collector strQai_;and as, determined by the Engineering Division's traffic analysis and the proposed roadway improvements; (h) The subject parcel is of an' adequate size to enable a proposed facility to meet development `standard requirements; .and --, G OT (i) The proposed land use is compatible with exi ing land uses in the. area, as much of the surrounding land is or s.--r1 remain undeveloped or can be designed so as to minimize possible impacts. 3. Based upon-the substantial."evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings,of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission,hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the s„' iect property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access,, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and (b) That the proposed ameWment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the. surrounding properties; and' (c) That the proposed amendment is .in conformance with the General Plana 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been rev:',awed and considered in compliance.,with the California Environmental Quality Act'of" 1970 and, further, this `CoMmissidn hereby recommends is,,"Wane of a'Negative Declaration. r° ,"i L u PLANOING COMMISSION RESOWTIM NO t GPA 89-M' September 27 1984 Page 3 - 5..1 Eased upon the findings and',p�inclustons set Forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,-this Cam�lission hereby resd1yes.t6at pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the Callfornia.,Goverhment Cof .z that the PlanCting Comaission r� of the City 'of Rancho Cucamonga hereby r6pri wOds approval on the 27th dAy of September, 19891 of General Plan Amendment, mendment ,ICp 89-020. G. The Secr�e ry ter this Commission shill' certify to the adoption of this Resolution. .APPROVED MO PAOPTECI--1z,'5 27TH OAY OF.SEPTEMBER, 1989. T,wANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY'OF RANC!D CUCMDNGA ' Larry T. McNie , Chairman ATTEST: r-`�'a3 ecretary �( ' I, Brad 8�r71er, 5eoretary'of the ,Plannintl C�or+nissivn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do, hereby certi ey that the foregoing Resolution was`duly and regularly introduced; passed,, and adopted by the Pla,nn ,g Cans�tissl'on of the City Rancho Cucamonga, eta .regular meetin, of the Pia`rning Carisiyior•.held on the 27th.dzy of September, 1989,. by the follaw* vote4do wit: AYES: COMISSIONER5. NOES: CCMMISSIONERSi A8$EN7: C"ISSIONERS. ff % ,J a 4 ! k iF.t RESOLUTION NO+ f A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENOMENT:89-05, REQUESTING TO AMD6, THE DEVELOPMENT 'DISTRICTS MAP FROM FLOOD CONTROL TO LOW DDISITY RESIDENTIAL (2'-4 DWELLING UNITE., PER ACRE) FOR M5 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BANYAN MEET, EAST OF THE DEER CRE)SK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL, ARID MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR: 201-191-24. A. Recitals. (i) The City, 61! Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has filed an application for b�velop6ent Disi�►,ict Amendment No. 89.05, as described in the „ title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the applicatian (ii) On Se.,,*e;ber,21 ,j 1989, the Planning Commission of the,(City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the arr"ication 'i3 and recommended to the City Council that the associated General Pl?,,- tendment No. 89-02D be approved. - r ; (iii) All legal_ prerequisites to the adoption of this P;esoluiion have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby found, determined and resolved. by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: . 1. This Comnission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in. Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct. ' 2, Based upon substantial evidence presei.ied to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on Sc,�%mber 27, 1989', including written and oral staff reports, together with- public' testimony, this Commission hereby;specifically finds as follows: ' (a) The application applies to approximately 1.15 acres of land, in basically a triangular configuration, located an the ert,7 side of Banyan Street, eats of the Deer Creek Mood Control,Chanel and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as.Fiood'Contral; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site: is designated flood Control and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per, Acre) and is under constriction. The property, to the east is designated Flood Control and is vacant. The p• iper.ty to the south is designated LoW Medium Residential -(4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is under construction; and PLANNING COMt7ISSI0N'RiSOLJ ION t{0. } BOA:89-05 �i September 27i 1989 Page (c) _ This amendment does not conflict with: the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a mapper consistent with the General Plan and with related development and (d) The property .is suitable for the use proposed, as t� been designated surplus by the,-Flood Control District and will be adequately protected from flows from the north, as dtitermined by the Engineering.Division as a result of hydrologic Analysis and proposed floo(t,protection measures; and (e) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and y (f) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the, surrounding properties; and (g) The proposed land use will have adequate access based on compatibility with the bordering collector street and as 'yetermined try the Engineering Division's traffic"analysis and the proposed roadOoy.,J mprovements; and (h) The subject parcel is of ,an adequate size to enable a proposed facility to meet development standard rt ,.r,.rements; and (i) Ths-proposed land use is compatible with existing land uses in the . area, as much of, the surrounding 1=:==�� _,is or will remain -indevet*ped or can be designed so as to minimize possible inoacts. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as followsr, (a) That the subject property ;,,s suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This 'Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with'the California Environmental Quality Act- of, 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby .recomslends issuance of a Negative Declarations �J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION, NO. ODD 89-05. September U. 1989 Page 3 5., Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 30 and. 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section. 658SO to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 27th day of September, 19894',d€ Development District°Mendagnt,89-05, 6. The Secretary to this Cammissian shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED ,AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH 9AY OF SEPTEMBER, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSICM' OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOti9A Larry 'McN a ,' Chairman t ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary r I, -3rad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regulav,ly int:*oduced, passed, and k,,+ed by the Planning Commission of;the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular oReting of the-Planning Comm ssion" 1d on the 27th day of .Septemer, 1189, by the following vote-to-with AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS, v ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; a ' �--- CITY OF R¢? I:O G(7CAAIONC.& CC 1 DATE: September 27, 1989 TO: Chairman a±!_Memhets of the Planning,Commission i FROM: Brad Bulger, City Planner, 8Y. Tom Gratin, Assistant Planner SUBJECT- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT r n cbr6TTIONAI USE. PERMIT 89»24 R NC U N ! EN G N Y re ev - De apment o tire stattgn tota`f{ng square feet on. 3.1$ acres of land in the Flood Control District in- the I, proposed LGw Residential U'jstrict (2-4 dwellim-t units per acre), located on the north stria of Banyan Street, east of the Deer Creek Channel • APN: 2O1-191-94. Associated with this project is General Plan Amendment 89-02D a:xf Development_District Amendment 8945. I. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: f A. Action Requested: Approval; of a Conditional Use Permit, detailed site p an, grading plan, landscape plan, bui;ldirx3 elevations, and. the issuance of a Negative Declaration, B. , Surround Land Use and Zoning North - Flood control, Single family,residential (under construction)t Flood Control District, Low Residential Mstrict (2-4 dwelling units per acne) South Single family residential sunder construction); low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant; Flood Control District Best 4 Flood control, Single family residential (uncle construction); Flood' Control District, low Residenti�j District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations.- Project Site - Flood Control (Civic/Community designation proposed) North - Flood Control, Law Residential S.quth - Low Medium Residential Etst Flood Control West Flood'Control, Lori Residential ITEM! I a PLANNING C(MMISSM STAFF REM l .CUP 8944 -:FIRE STAT104 " September 27 1989.' Page D. Site Characteristics; The project site is., currently vacant and vegetation :consists of native grass and-`WeOds. The .site slopes approximately five (5) percent from north to south. The site is bounded to the west by the Deer Creek Channel and to the .so,sth by ;,-Ay an Street. The property directly north and east- S vacant• E. Parking ;Requirements:. Parking reggirements for the fire station were based upon a., tWentyCAour (24) hour shift ":onsisting of five (5`) fire fighters and one (1) R;r#alion Chief. " The foli'nwng summarizes -parkin. spaces' ;provided at Fire Station No.. 5: f Visitor, 5 Personnel, n 1 Total 17 F. n2glcable Re ulations: £ The Development, Code permits fire station uses within the low Residential District, subject to a Conditional lase "Permit.` II. ANALYSIS- A. Background: ,Asso�' `tted with this_project- is ,General plan Amendment 84-02D ale Development,;Oist: ict Amendment 89-05. The General Plan X—t�4idmdnt proposes to change the land use designation from Flood Control to- Civic/Comrunity. The w- >"Iopiment District Amendmen�;,;,raposes to,ohartge he land use a'tm,crict from Mood control`tn`Low-ResiderE al. B. General: The davelopment proposal consists of a fire station totaling i} n'?6=tguar2 feet: 0n-site ane"ities include living quarters <cor.;nine,.(9) persons, an exercise roam, library, training room and .front office. Due to -the proximity of the proposed fire station,to existing and proposed residential uses the arch itck:^,seas directed.-,to create a' residential character in the building design "for neighborlood compatibility. Architectural elements include a barrel the roof, a Erick wainscot, a soldier course Trick iintel, 44 stucco finish with .a stucco corbel, and aai.lti-paned W 3r-�,-'.ws• C. Desfi n Review.Coi ittee: At various times, all members of the Planning Comrlission have had, the opportunity to revievt the proposal,, the following comments` summarize their concern :. , +v., 5..j t�t t" PONNING COMMISStON STVF' ttEPW TCUP 89-24 FIRE STATION " Septerrkerk 27,` 19' p�� 3• j ,F. Architectures � is �In ord ta' .ar hi er eve a residential "feel the arcfti ectu,,d eras revised to i.hclude a brick wainscot, large areas of a plaster finish which include subs£ r ial stu ,o ctrbel, a sol(Iier c,xjrse brick: lintel above ,-the garage doors lesdin4l Ao` th6' apparatus room, " multi-paned 'win ows land -W bagel„tile roof (refer, to 'Exhibit iTd-Incy The barrfll.. the rnaf' 6641d be utilized for consi5 ,with addacen + si ;stjai,buildings. 2. The garage doors "leading to the apparatusroom should be painted to match the building exterior.','-' Site Plat' - r. 1. A de6ra?tive paving/banding treatment should be provided at both draveway to break up Iarge "expanses'of paving. 2. & low.-4all ,+ir ;a decorativernative stone veneer, should: be pr6VIlm. screen -the parking areas from public view. ?.f 3. Trees planted,around the perimeter of the project .site should b�•spaced at a minimum of twenty �20) feet-on" center. ;Try"es at the-east, project bdundiry should be extended Towards Banyan,Streeu� 4, . Trees planted albng the, east project,boundary, should be moved away front the -,perimeter Wall to prevent' landscaping from overh4r4iny onto Ad3ac�Tt property. = 5. AdjiItfoniil street trees should be provided. used ''on tV,e project frontage and street tree spaC'�nq, requirements, a total of seventeen (17) street trees'-are re-40red, &. A� s� al trews should be,provided,within the landscape se.Oack along Banyan Street. 7. The wall along the. east; boundary should be stepped down as 3t .approaches Banyan Street," Sight lines should be': `'~ ` plotted:bn "the landscape plan rto show at whet points the"I, will height needs to be recessed.. Other 1. All equipment;will be ground Mounted art should J#e adequately screened by landscaping are; low decorative Walls. ' PLANNING COMM ISSIUN�STAFF `SPORT CUP 88-24= FIRS VTATIb.N �, 5epteyber 27, 1981 Page 4 ,i D. Environmental Assessment: Part I'of the •initial Study has , been completed bys the applicants Staff has •completed Part 41I , 'Of the Environmental r checklist and hate found. no,, signiffdant tj impacts on.the enpironment as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR _FINDINGS: In order to awprave the Conditional Use hermit, the:,Commission"woo"1d need to make the fo111s�0ng f`ind-ings: 1. The proposed use rv111 be in.: accord With the General Plan, the obJectives of -the. Ueveloprrint Code, and the Purposes of the district j`n`�which the site is located. 2. The proposed use, together with +he, conditions applicable%; thereto, Will , not be <detrimental to the publ.c heOth, safety, or,,iielfare, or materially; injurious to properi1ie's or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The proposed use will comply With each of & applicable pr visions of the Development Code-. IV. CORR MONO ERCE,f��This item has beep advertised.as' a poblic'nearing" in he D Re aft newspaper, the' property .posted with a supplementaT, notification sign, and, notices sent t0..alt pr..0perty owners within 300,feet ofthe projet_�, site. V. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends the Commission adapt the attached, Resolution of Approval. K Re tfu11 bm Lted, ,z l Brad Buller City Planner BB:TG•sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site UtiTizatio!i Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit' "C" - Grading.Plan exhibit 9" - landscape Plan Exhibit '*,Ell - Building Elevations` Exhibit '"F" - Architectural Rendering of Fire StatiorF -'Ro.,4 r Exhibit '"G'" - Building Sect'an Wall "Detail- Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions ''0 r% x r Y% IIIIni t L. Y Y,nr IN NilA11i.� umn1. � LMr � � ® 4nnlu tiMwr! -►tutwnu IM- NN: i'fif77 Alto 1r wa: `36L72.�- v�Z I1G7T� rt� N -ryt3f Fbrl jd'" �� 48.8 AC. - 22, _h ZE. 2� S.6,C.F.Cv / aY 454• i� � ll 1 ' -`BANYAN.STHEE ��`' t IPA" x. m zr ui \JOAC�. IM56 Par.3 x 85`875'AC. :'TO - q , r. 8 iIBrT: SCAM. R.rwwr. KLe., Z1 P� nI►t`nt Ufa ,e.u�Muwe►x,o '�� I " '� . wu► 4�a r fiTATt►411tl110 wo <%iTiigN - � NMI", nu7W 11026 t ►,p'y, t ii, T (jF • itl 'i d ,, g', .i II BSIP"T n.a:Ca >e 1 - t � /nd•aata�ww!w�Y, M �::•�� / feBY' �..� � �. • � a +,��d ...�,-..�� 3.t. 'I'9f O PcAN1C PCUCAMONG �qq�p �{YC4.I.V0:`i�1V .. . V1� •i:16rGi x mn�.r nleo EXHYBr Oi " s °ALE lit � 4 � r � f � tipYZ I .,� kj- BANYASN STSS '.. Ty OFRANCHWCUCI&MONGA p OV IBI'd': +�� aC:1& : t LEGEND ACCENT PALM nfY 11111'.AMNMINiI' Yai -'N4 fpYfYPIfN11 Yt1f1 ACC_TNT TREE n MO10.1M1a Nam. �r PAR. LOT iREE n aunsnctnaln a\wlesat.uwcumccs • TnanaTnrE fllegl•Ywi111S/l {ltitl'TIUin1Yl1M�1\1Vf Y, - BAIiYAII STF�kT CARE S \w uuow.ur•—,�-� pT11Nil(•IMIaIY WSIQIII\fl tS ..: !! $}ggJp:MOIAACOVCR�IM:A ,�nw bl�IMpZi•4MIi'.Mfil C•I/J1M•YYI'• l �—�i�`in:i�ri.�`n\-- IWt\)Gt16HR - 1Y141u�{tIl.1G'Rt{KRII' S • � llntfY'IYJ'YY UT. Yl1W'r.AMA .. �� '1 li� ! l:.•=� 611AVE4 MUCH Aft lwlii I 6 � � / w.cwwi• ■.IC.1 1 •WA r EXHifYt' �` SCALE + 9 {{ A UN 3 r'OA , "s + walk »� .�. i 40. UP \ . i 7, ,x t raytti rrar: 5 _w r .r. Wr f IN Of pifitAllok �: 441 Aft k i i 1:• t.t� l � i t9M��y ar�lrfr J. ReBMD'�(l:r.1101 Ni$' R�6R1Q1r3at BMgM ' Y f 5'TTTT OF r�l CM OF RANCITUCUCANIONGA ' • 'cif r � � �W'Flyl�♦tom _�,�{��/.«� — .�. _.�1y1.."r� iW���'�,t•��•c�'�L•r:iiFFZ'•3,IttJ,?'�eT:/ '�� PLANNING V"ION Tn-m.. m N ISTR'r SrAlr. Prot Yam" +� 1 r IT� .z r --, 1 :RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY RANCHO CU::AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERN•�T NO, 89-24 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FIRE STATION TOTALING 11,026 ;SQUARE FEET ON 3.15 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON,THE NORTH SIDE OF 'BANYAN STREET, 'EAST OF THE DEER CREEK CHANNEL 1K THE PROPOSED LOiA RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND. MAKING• FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: ' 201-191-21 A. Recitals. (i) The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has =filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional. Use "Permit No. 89-24 as described in Re tNe title of this Resolution. Her in solution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the' application", (ii) On the 27th`,of September, 1989, the Planning Coimiss`an of the City of Rancho Cucamonga tianducted a duly'noticed public hear` ;g on the application and concluded' safl hearing on that date. (iii) All legal' prPr&r.isites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.B. Resolution. NOW., THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commis�.on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows, 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds' that all of the i•a• ts set forth in the Recitals, Part,A, of this Resolution..are true ?nd cori.act. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission ' during the above-referenced public hearing on September 27. 1989. including written and arai staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) t.e application applies to property located An the north side of Banyan Avenue, east of the Deer Creek Channel, with a street frontage of 348 feet and a lot depth of 600 feet, and is ,poLksently vacant; and (b) The property`,to the north and east of the subject site is vacant, and the property to the-south and ,rest of that site contains single family homes (under coistruction). 3y Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings> of i facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2'aoove, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. o Y r1 ! 7 _ -PLAmING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO C� CUP 894.4 - FIRE STATION Septe;ber r27,.1980 f ,Page 2 ° (a) That the proptsed ,use- will be in accord With the pleneral Plar, the objectives,of the Development •Code., and the purposes of The district in which the site is located. (b) That, the proposed use- together. Frith- the _aryndit one applicable thereto, will not be, detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious :to properties or improvements iP the vicinity. (c)- That the proposeduse will comply with each of "the, applicable provisions of, the bevelopment .Code.. 4. :This Commission hereby finds and ,certifies that the project has be ,i reviewed and considered 1n compliance' with the California Environme�r2a1"Quality Act of 1970 anv, further, this ommission' hereby issue's a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conrlusions set forth in paragraphs -t, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Com^tission hereby approves the appiftation subject-to �d ch and every condition set forth below and in the attacFtad Standard Conditi�\ps, attached hereto and incorporated herein'by this ` reference. Plann`ng_Df-ision AM (1) A decorative'payingl'riding �treafiment Shall be provided at hoth__drivewa � to,break 'u, large expanses of paving, subject` to approval by the, City Planner. jt (2)' " A low screen wall With rb`rative native stone veneer shall be provided, to'screen the narking areas from public view. ` Jll (3) Trees planted around the `perimete4 i f the project site shall bespaced ai 'minimum of twe)ity (2O), feet-on- center. frees at the east- .project boundary'shall be -extended towards Banyar_-_Steeet. (4) Trees planted along the easy,project boundary shall be moved away from t;�e peHwM ter wall to prevent landscaping.`from overhanging onto adjacent property. Seventeen (17) street treesi,shail be provided within the Banyan park ay: In addliilon, the number of trees provided within the Undscape setbsck shall b_ increased along Banyan, to the satisi,rction of the City 'Planner. �a 4 PLANNING COW_TS5TOW RESO4f1TI0N NO �7 CUP,'84 24 FIRE STATION T . September 27,,19m 41 Page 3 (6) tardscape and irr gation plans addressing all proposed Ian and �i:nnitions "_+of appYoval 'shall . be d r" ;} submI`ted for rely ew. an, approval by the City ?lsnner prior to the issuance of be;l �;ng permits, ''S" _' it __. r (x) Tf P,` Wa11 alopq the east boundary st;a1T be stepped down t J as,ia k,pproaches 'BanAk,n 'Street. SV ht 110es, shall be Plotts ,r on Ue landscape plan to: sh4�^'at!what points the`° wall heitht,,,needs-to be ,recessed. Sighi'lines need to he rSv awed and anRroved'hy'the City :Edgineer,, prio'r,to the jmsaanee of btiitding permits for the perimeterWl—�= 1 (8) araof mounted equipment ..is: p oposed; hence, all " equ Jpmeot .. shall be ground nulled and shall r.• be adefmatelY'screened-by Undstaliniij. 'and lug. decarat? p � wal`P.. .Any landscape screenat�g shall be.shown on the ld�idsc=Pe :and irrigatis r' plans ' tp�°. te reyz,ewed and `' approved b Che cit Planner M Y y p•gar,to'�. the,, issuance'of ng permits. (9) lliel,applicant shall prepare a test` panel ofti'e�exterior paint olpr f+ approval by •the,'PT a;inIng Division during c4nStF llGtlon (10) 171se :garage doors-,leading to th apparatus room shall be pai),ted to match the building 'exterior. rr r 1' Engineeritiq Divisan, Special Conditions: extsti'r19 art-site ifes,lting facility shall as be relocated easterly of tt�e p�^oe,x bauridar�a = and ;location siiaTf__be...deteFmi&6d by :.a fr:Yal _drainages; study. (2) Flood rotection ,aetiiti� � � r P es�sha47 be provided, to potect ; the Project site M6,1a flow from the north, ,�°:the satisfaction of City €ngineer. (S) Trees are""prohibited within five- (s+ feet of ttte outside diameter of any, public sto�-nc d,, pipe measired from a the doter edge of a matsre tree ,trunk (4) A permit from ' he -N?�Arnpo)itan ry41ate* "q strict �s reggited gar work within lies right ay., k, f^ jt f +1C? R1 .c PLANNING,COMMISSON RESOLUTION NO,. " CUP '69-24 -:FYRE STATIp7,: September 27, 3989 9,- (5) ,Tt.e:;deveioper"shall provide necessary easements in favor, of.,t-19 San Bernardino County Flood Control District to. g,c vide access, to. t#ie ,Deer Creek Channel lapd;!cohstruct" pay meat-within the easements to'.the satisfaction of::the County Flood ,Coptr ] Dist°nzet: a �., s• (6) Tk_ eveloper .shah acquire the necessa y de.. cctiq'y:and construct tfCe north .one-lhal i° or Banyan Street from the Deer, Creek Channel Bridge to and including the,, intersaction of 1111liken- Avenue: The;developer may" request a reimbursement agreement `to recover`,`the costs Of -eohstructing' the,.off:-site improvements from future. ,r deve.iopraent of the proper�tiE� located in the nort�side r of Unyan.,Street.. Off-s,iteparkway+ improvements - ''be deferred uii ii dev�elopment.4f the adjacent pro'perty,,: k 6. The Secretary_to ih s,CCor�nission shal1Ycertffr to the idoption of this Resolution.•, rr� APPROVE.'ANC ADOPTED THIS" 27TH DAY OF ScPTEMBER, 19059 PLA.NNING COMMISSION OF TEE,CITY 6P RANCHO,CUCM1ONGA b' Larry Ti McNre1, Chairman ATTES 1: Brad. Suller, Secretary I {3rad Sul ter. Sect t sr_ n ,,.- o � ,. e dr: af..th, Pi�nr��ng.C:�..,.:i:; i„st- o, tide tt-ty aim Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cerrsFv that the' foregoing Re�solutton w,,s duly and M ` regularly introduced, paaseexyt.=id edgp-ad by=the Planning ommiss or=of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regul� meeting of t,R (tanning Commission, ommission he'1d . on the 27th day of Sepiember,. I9f ,rbv ,tha_ foliowin9 vote-to-wits AYES., CoMP4:5�IONERS r. NOES; COMMISSYONER i f C ABSENT: GL aZSSiO%ERS: C Al ai /+ v. r t✓ y� Yea a� ear "!L no■ {� ��"'r BE SYOtJ M$ C L OR sr Y N�is �y+ 3 :e�$ Lu •-u �Ly v:rpe �uT �'e�q@ j� ■ .-0Q gR Cip� ~� i•.Y 'Ye.Y OCW Q`g Q' �Q. t bC ..�C 'O',Y N� V.S�•YO L Y,�.':.gLR� L. V'Y. GMt3 - eC� �CNM3o--• L'.jl" ".O d` 00., u±v updN� 0B•3^:N YTO NE.NY C - OG�„✓' qN^• .:CSC ^ V` �+Y � �:.Y1C�p •{.J v. ��pyYd yC�� vI F'jC ?� Ld �dq Wµ ' /� Z-1�Y 6�� O�y �YNL �M.tiw �yi iggqM1�• �V Mom•- Y Q6 dM,y. e. C is 1. 4y.0 01 p L ` ACO d�t,►G LY O�� '6q q��T ur � [g0.YO-.Z.9 1�y0• ~.G«��e'. �„C � RCC; a ;pa Yvm .e � qqY�y�c Nyr, pq o gn pf C Y N~y Ya U �•4.4.aC]1 N 1.Q wC. .e :Y �� N K GV :YC Wr a f cu f, r'Y • Y 014:L L �,y Y S'p i.9 OA a ~ g qa 6 pyd� qu u xr CA off..• �' '. '-Tp,. `4�� as �pVVp Z�■y7 tC `CU.�oj+$® $� sZ a o�e�y$'•V 51 lP ��•,_�'S�i fps 5D /_M�'C 6D, M (� i�llp �Y�� Mai +ti �ru � �� pl �• r _u S '19VG� ®!NIZ a+g2i4p.'p2} aq`uYY 9 `b a, a.a E•` i:CgN = d g g 09 C.M �_ 1.e i q Gyp C' � A` 9+• O �• p 8� , L�/p p,�'3� y C�> yy ,V C��t Q F'• v T C Y 1 JY�Y e .wY l' ':� L f'•'L C� ;:, NFL ` �.S�L d yp. a dCY y $ybL '..YC11.� .M„L'^�� $Vy�.i ; lii CC iz C }C W .d l w Y y p 4 C 0.2 JI Y ul.. ♦ Y$` E {.016 A •�q F V' 99«C. �d�Y9Y OII•"":LNe NA �,MIL��wO GM. O i 5�ldw Q y C� YL "ETw 08 1►�yi �ZV YbC O q w.9 4 p.tf (p(er Cy :8®�9C �LLLYGp AG y�YyO �yy $Y�Y 1 it15 V •.O r.� dy9 W' ,ree•SSOiIi'p YwNf�Y�TI /m 6««MMq,y.. Y�Y :: CL xM C•� =1�♦ q I.-C !Oy4 9 WeeY pO NmN 4Yt 9I�.' �G Yi .VW CN^ O N G O VY Ny� Y N CC•L M'�q C yy Y'' y } 9M�v j G}/ 12 YO P y Yy _Y C M�9� �Y p..� p Y.�i Y ■ 10 C Y • �e �b^� LL. MNYw. n .'.^: a gs A! _ uv`. .p..uaW��Q: Y�pp�E �Y Q"r CCCC a�.' +bra @.'•�Y y'j ...y��(� YA Ip Za .LlAJ .. eAe„ Oid adp�LIC^..`op. oO�Ca06$ dPy`N: L„iLYc Y. q_qYtlp0.p 1y8p, KiV y,y CN Vyy UV I 4L g�`aa!�``tl`, iIyCG+.�®:. 'yg.11�;,. dya(�+��1y� a4 4 Y�6i H V) wHL � 4{pl: �v NNG$wW � GKANO SI. TIT r .Y9 01../CCs ••Y�_ ~q '' ^ )�N��eF@IIb �C y��YL pY�p4 Mq6 >.q6d'.80.gL Z. COP `3$,y_gA yV 4jAq L-s 2� �� c CMpp~ 0�y�cti` M a"Q d W C Y L' Y �� 99■��� aNx~Q ;. 212 S l e r�d 9 g L N Gnu' � P O���'q$ So ZMA •N, P,o 6! cg n :� :e rd 'yi a4 AB a^ :N'3 31 py :_� `A g+_. z a i �a fi�9 it P s v N K~ , �P L� ~ W. ffi : sn9 a .. _o �s »� gw ��� uxPyc w To x., 6L L 3.3 ea=`v Fes P` a ®9�a�x «iVo .4Vev g �y 2 9 ^� L . " �o a��:: a.i . r .fO Va� ai wg¢yy.�� b'� ¢mc�x a°' „g J i C s � A, p y gq y, e9g y O q0015 1.2 ! x '�„ R9 OaCN ScY N �•Y� QrY �� 8��lG�r.$ Ka„�p_:g c�_o�^r$ V a L tlw81 �p �p 6 it �q �i11M 9� Oe To n—..Z � F. eY ® M G Ma.. �..�Vq g V q. �~� o ti !C LtN-w O O qAy o.``C�..V pyp °:.N: la JQ MO tu.O� i". N"i ;:,P `.tl: {� �OyP �' y Y o:s.0.p i +C9 .0 4U �1�9N, w ... �+ O.Y6yg .., �w�9so.L _7' '�.. a°{o .o moo, � _r8E �" o�oo+.c.�ss utiL•�S .c-u+s�$ � .i.mv . p'c+.0 a N� u .r-o c •.r pps'+ C cu�y�r Y O O CW k tJ wtl � tl NCCO Yq NN 09 O�y.Y CII�a... Wtla'•. w $ C 'O'Y �`. LY.utlp �M YidCj CY C '�'Is YNd.Qa.: eJ L'a si ro,,,�+ .c. pN u�aQ"•t�i Y'rtpN} .- d. m, co _ �q Y� AY�I SO d•,.�0 1u.G. Y1CC�.�Q tlt q�y' �':.OaV Gb G� qG•�C \V l!f CC yO*. K a.N O Oq`N O' YY« YCLa ! yron p i O:p9 .LY OSI M.O ~Q YQ.N w0 Ntt..Y pN L4yC O�1 LC AyYy .g NO.�L Ls ' �N,GYL LT:�. ON Y�yqY YO KSJ.L W90M aSNV gLO�V NE■ Gy:01� /�O 'I N d" q�Od. �� l- Yq G yY�Gq L^O�� ^�•' � 4♦y �wYC /{y ` �� or» \\Q\I�'- _ ^ �R. ��a��''f�'•L q't'y` 1 -`�.,�� uvL �.CCN'ac2� /♦�V y H• O Y Y , otl'p� NYaOCy'�duC C 1� �Ac � 6 NO L Y..L C9O5 L O1 N.O 1� iC ^M w4 y LNL d ■N4 -y� y« Cy1 eT O g4� ��rt Ld a� 2' pp vfayeiYy ^ oyyyyFn S . o 3 q 0 1�N L i N y 9 r pq>q.1 N 1i O i Y w tl 6 i Y W O L Q Y L N C 'CI C C c G n 6 0 C C eT A 0 Y V OYOe yY. H ■pV a N c g 6 Y Y �p�pp may. 4`$ ^' CVVM^M. bC M � ^ L�C YYaa._ qa. �rpg N 9N 6N gyr Tl. q16 y�. CYO �. ;rN..' G r Q v 9 dL. qL O. LY GCp ,� - ;s� by L a r 4 ¢s y^a ®�aY��� •g^Tj �` yw � C�.. rat~. �oz6fis 'J Lr VI tlP q iJ M. 3; tl q•,,. s tl N is. r� e�. q �~��i M-La mega vgM o u'g^ eetle.'o IoYv»use'i«wo ty�. qV• ±ye�s�iPtl b�pr•^ e., .. dd �9l�� yyL w.u��O S CCO A.i. ypC^ wy.n.'�• L O . z .�Y {CjNO w c: O.4w^p JaG' e'.� _Y O»»�». ►a•o»tl 'qYN Cavd`.. 6�'�yoi Ntl wLMq �N`G- 6ui ls�eNen®�9sq~'gL IJ S x 'I 'I tillV 4N NnA �rM.Yf C OLa'.!! Olwj� 4 LdL V pf tit on "7 a',�i'�`�" a� c`•n.L"S ups," �o� � �'�.'p'w ��.�v4 »�•.�v.4YY�� c o�n C? ' 9y„ V4LL aN qP' p ��,..4.� L'y yNN pi0 :d LRr3 o' ..'G�CC�6w{ �u dV d�RF�,d aWrrY .v C1y u� i O C � d d.4� 6 U1*Y■ M G C.pG egegC 9q� �yyti 9 ag. N WaK Y '�' ».pQqqyyy�� ua PC�q'@gp,.�` .�WO W V�Gty Y+r/�aMi.Q d'y0 Ll'C A4piG �'O ffG.•i J L4�,04a LGcc y6�.OLr�4Wl@ A ¢_q _ � - MHO G�ti Y�Gp}~09p.�.:.Nyy4G S. R(j Oil �q.V��4T ��•O 4�[�W .y �N (��y�� yA��t4. 4C+rVFVN . 6L AL q d .,.� ♦N U M M"�Yyr aCL°iYd rO. Cd•+C V yL � TS X �•i. 1Q}."� M V91 MaM� Sr w Y,a¢yoi :u L.J ,W Gp�•' �yL{. pAU N S �9Kr Si Ofygyg�CCLg pph MCA IL YY.tiML- 1 GGgp¢{•� ((�� �wG..V. L ttVg6ppyTV }�� _3 'd.yp$d qM4 R'dw`d �~A �: R`�YC NGYS.wIp MY� dA Y O1 1+ 16Q ��yy 41 Lt1yy diOT Y D �q K�T�QQL i+s' DL t Y.C�S 6f�. O,V+K f.r C.i L C p Q 4 Q b�Y �` y � ti�� •� �~L CNv� gyyy� � Y P.3 llGt �L �.. �.�/ Y.'a Gi • M Rr S.yC3 V®C $�W L@, Y mr G.' Yy ME QCL 'pY+ Y yMN {ti dY4�P YII Gy � MM.P®® �� �.. �q CCM W: LqM ON,K C Q.w yrA I�w�. A 'a A� „G, •"Y d F 2'.:S a. 4 4' !@+ "•'cJh yL s py 'q J�r+RIE 1r-ii Lr 111 ��;,may.�Q �'4.' :1.�e �p -. Sor .b. 'G 6 L H C YI L ae �qR q'cy ae c •� � �wqy" ,`e �a: '� o`4S �"y'qq�' '^$�N vp'•w�±ice+. L~-C Y � •q * ri M M�` � �C d •.`� �Z. �F W yp 9.G dy y�$f it qd Lt a� o LV�Yj 9 V a {{� yip{•{µ Y.V. M ci a g. L rR' 'VAYbia�p TJ au q i wKCUMi �� a r L C A M ; V a i.iL ® N M- N i s M 9 ti 4� 2-ca.., 'v ap w c,' fit, ggaG.. an � ,fit ,•ac,' a_ a � aYJW OEM BE OEM �ppr c a- _ y. - +'+ rtara 'girt $� i .,W c w `�a� `p +- � Jas rtN og'� b� wFrt�rtr mta adao+ 5tcr ' SaSic'ry t" 71 moo s � sL $ .dM '019 -w � d.. O U ICi C 4 I1I C9yy�C{ i0 ^wL' _ova1 >Cy 8�6 'CISr U :t. C sI l L C 7� Y c�j •/� '!'G p.N.. q q .. � d q�L U yb'3 O N:T Oy � �• � UNa[O pd GW` .. T.NN LIT, 6ryL �U _ p NC O r,p: Y.0 w�@}vC e rU C B'C :5 Zr((t CY u r Cca O `4 c cL Nam.G Ai, V.y^r G=grJ'..� o.. wL Y V VNn:LC pia r/!t 1 's �'Of E1u G;o o'^ SJ1� i '.�1+s�1= 'E Q M M'•w,. Js Y•.•f L ILO,i9� !y^J�VPOI■, b i�� 'U �` LC Lr eror ML VV pp GfR�yy'N R OO.c-W OW `H COi9 �L t~N OCM Mi IL 64 R! U $ A..� t•i f 4f1I b 1 Zl •Q p k iaTi'yyots,Z c+a L O ® O O _ _C4� 'lYL� w0'U.µappl. OI E.SOC gasp.- TV LU {yO� Is 4.0 N�P�Sr y a rV��y¢ OMC L. LYwtl.1,w. C mid .fit• i p' a �H... B U 4J`r. Hi �,C�h `Sv9 M�... W` V1pi AQ� p. gO±" b• ® ^ y-;" 4p mth C7ppppttW u peril « NwV �g N�n�L 46 •••� v4. u� w �� S q Ncu q q ^Y�ggaa.03 L��(5 y ypr B R C M L4 ER ass ��� 1 Ts �y S . vY oOl g H '�4N �tl T .,gyp+. [[[ppp999 !� apt gO py . Yf M W Y we m .S;4 i R A � i RM lC Pf 1�m Q i 1l- ij. _ •..Pl N „1 O C N �► yj 1p .... � 08 -.`�CqC 72 9'.."O yP r8 �'�;O r _G •� g. •. �9y _p v py ca Ley -` m + �Q�"i. -S j 4 e YA C EL It b N GY� el 4 yy i d O.:`V �C GOO. � VH. �VL-E� C6 HIS y.'V OyM.. LYy GOGB� 1..L 4 �.YV � I{ YC N G wY. yu�01M pg� Gt�A Li �.tY ` CJI:Vw SYpO. 6Y u. N } 3s��Y•r v1Q L Lay:y `y Od :•O t' =Y Y._Q L =Yl: .. y,YC BBit 29 �GL ■11' � �" L a� L^'Qu.E.. .^u" oL�' � P� a,."'. vL tea" tGM W9q i^ Cam.: i • �Y y7NO.V W DLO C = +.•U C YdA Al V,GY q�I M tl� �ytj O tl� 1YyY O1 ^Y C!p V C:O 00 •6 �L Y:� J T�Y Y Q Y L L lNt W Y 64 N U> O N Cu N Y• U M N 3 LI y91- Y 4 tl C'..9 y C� •`�10.S rJ Y. N9 6Yy.:Y' iGi A.�" '"BSNL.aY.H 3. .' uV qaq. 1�.9 .Ci rOYCCR': QY L "( ll �iN T IIN �J � SQIO yY ��iOL� 4M G M � ty y 3SY b 7'+�• GN YC y VN. VV .fit TKO SG ��� Yt'G�� �i $t, •3Y Y �� ,�jwi u�3 a �r yeCprro }N� �p rr �MOp 4 �(V(tlp VY• 01 + 7t W .O6W r CL 7 ,�QY L ~Cc6 tAyL GV G aNpS/' LpycVp Cq � 19�YN� CY�Vn.., do LY4f q .r ...4$i '� � ,�ca v °n• Sit '��L O.a'sVis BirY 'f E LS�e •c w we c W i is 3d `m Lap. ® GC +L h fie EE Yu— c - i O V 4 ZIN Nr w GG CY CL i� r G y. G v My N yCr. A x gas �tLo IL Id q V 1 yp Y�AL LO. yyN t6 N: i O � C OC� .N L. al OY��'I L C1^y `. Gy�� iYy N '• p�L �LpY Y; ye`t i O 4. f aMN• ^: �g p�. ,'-�,,. �` .y.. Jr 4 �.J v O G� N M.Mp• d K E M P m Si�� M :YJ .eq� OC�Lp �p Y.US N. 'O YU9 YLh JM4C 4 2 eyq O Y �. Y y r dl Y N~ o gal g$ §L .� ' L �a LES ./` O' O�'Y= qa�g �L pp1{Q)1 - 2M sf1 {pqyVr$S.. WMQ YY^-'� aV 6Lq¢,�Q�GgLy J ryY ypyM4 Mt ..gam 9r� ~M:' p �' MqC �� e. r YI M,. il K e I1 a _ _ .— -- CITY OF II.ANCHO CUCA°MONGA STAFF R�, PORT Amok t� DATE: September '27, 1999 TD: Chairman and Members of the Planning Conoission FROM: Urrye R. Hanson, 'Senior Civil Engineer f BY: Barbart. Krall, Assistant,-Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE �tARCEt. W-F 12779 - Rancho Cucamonga e eve apaaen . onUY a Ct'�e'at'ion. f a 1 . acre parce rota va -acre no on ro parcel within tf.e Flocd :Control_ Development District, located on the north side of Banyan Street;' east of Dior Creek Channel (APH 2O1-19144) I. PROJECT AND SITU DESCRIDTION: ;r A. Action Re nested. �fn' q Approval, of the proposed Tentative� ,`reel Map as shown on EXH1011 "U" B. Parcel Size,. Parcel 1 - 3.00anet exiles C. Existing Zoning: Flood Control , D, 'surrounding Land Use: North - Single Family and Flood Control South Single Family Resid'vntial East - -Flood•Control E J West - Deer Creek. Channel; Single Family Residential E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code'Designations: North - Flood Control . South Lour tadium 4-8 DtiIs/acre ` East- Flood Control West Low 2.4 Dins/acre. . «_,.. . ITEE4 d I PLANNIUG CDMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTAT"i4E. PARCEL AAP 12779 - {'AWHO�CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AG!KCv SEPTEWER,27, '1989 PAGE 2 P. Site Characts"risiics: The site slopes approximately S fram north to South and contains a desalting ursin which :s to be relocated oft ate as a condition of, this project. II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of thistmap'is to separate 3.15 acres of land;froia the Flood Control D strict(<pi�iper�y to cr.Wate a parcel f0i"the development of'Fir(= Nation No. 5, llie proposeU uaielopment plan for the fire station is on °onight's ,agenda as CUP 89-24. StrQ^t Improvementsit for the north side, of'Banyan Street from the Deer, Creek Channel to Milliken Avenue,are tobe constructed as a condition of, this project. The south side of Sanyan Street and the bridge over the Deer Creek Channe are beirc9 constructed as a part of the single family residential develo ent to :the south,. III. ENVIRONMENTAL WEV16: The applizani,'�completed;.fart I of the Initial stuay. can uat0l_ a fit-I'd invi,si gation and_ comRl ted Part II of the Initial Study. taa adverse Impacts up R- -,} envt.ranment are anticipated as a result of,this project. %4.,Or ` ,-Qj'suance of Aegati" Declaration is appropriate.< IV. 'CORRESPONDENCE: `Notices of Public Hearfng have been sent to surrounding property- owners and placed in the Daily; Report NEwspiper. PostiN at the site has*also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION. It is recommended that the Planning d6mitsion consiie� all inputan elements of the;Tentative Parcel Map 12779 If after s'urh consideration, the C ission can recomr*�id" appecv.al, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a iNegative Declaration would be appropriate, y, Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior.Civil Edginec-,.'' BRH:BK:sd Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A�,) Tentative Map'(Exhibit `t*) Resolutinn and Recaa ended Coma L on='vr` Approval J PROJECT SITE a GANYAW FTREET 4 (Qjr w 3• HIGHLAND �W t AVFIAK �.o.a.r IMu STREET a t °i FOOTHILL lOUIEVARO 2 21 SAN BERNARDINO FRUWAV MY OF PAPME L MAP I Z779 jr"CHO CUCAMONGA Tri is G 'fie ON �:.� ! �.� . `7 19 V?CK50UR6 COURT / V Cd � zz ��j� zi /��•� f J za PARCEL I Iibpe N:11.00"I vat h AA PPCkMATTOX COURT 30 fe �3Ot�e1MKtM Nutrti CM1Tq}�M1W f{{a+Jsblec .. I q�w 6Al R.�_ �rw are qa tiM rY17 14 54., 55 ` 56 ! •'" �r 04 071, PARCEL MAP R-ANC140iCITCAMONGA TMA TENTATNt"AMAP G DWOON % RESOLUTION NO., Albk A RESC:UTION OF THE'RLANWING CO MRISSION,;�F THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,. OnL-iFWNIA, CONDIT73NALLY "APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL 'mp NUMBER 12779, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE 'OF BANYAN .STREET, EAST OF DEER .CREEK CHANNEL APN 201-191-24 i WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel W9,p Number 19779, submitted by. City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment 'Agenoy, applicant, for the purpose of surdividing into l `parcel, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 201-191-24, located on-" the.. north side of Banyan Street`* east of Deer Creek Channel; and, WHE;1AS, on September 27 1989, the Planning Cbmnission held a daIy advertised public hearing for the above-dascribed real,'. NOW, THEREFORE, THE .RANCHO CUCAMONW, PLANNING COfiMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 That titre following findirlo. have been made:, 1., That the map"is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That :he improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent wth the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development,; [ 4. That the propasEa s01411vision and,i t..'�ovewents will not cause substant,?'4 enviteonmental 33mage, public health`problems or;, .ve a&-'1,rse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: This Commissf6n finds and certifies that the project has been rev ewe an considered "in compliance with the Cal ifornia,£nvironmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Cowgission hereby issues a`Negat've Declaration. St_tION 3• That Tentative Parcel Mp 'No. 12779 is hereby approved l subject ie attached Standard , Conditions and the follawing Special Conditions: t` 1. The ex.isti)y; on-site desflting faeiit shall 'be felo:ated easterly at the project bou:Jary. The s,ze and location..shAll be deter►air4ed by a final drainage study:. 2. Flood prwatAction facilities' SMll be R"4vided to, Protect the project;vsi : from flows fr am �north" to the. '.sat;sfactton .of City Engineer. c enaa, _ s 3.-. Trees arm prohibited within 5.0 fesr of the outs a diameter of any public 'story drain pipe measured from the water edge of,a mature tree trunk. ' 4. A permit from the Metropolitan;Wolter District i.s required for work.within its righ�2-of-way. 5. The developer sha,j provide necessary easements in favor of the - San- Bernardino C6�,ht�y. -Floe-`°Control 13vstrict to-pro,v de-access to the Deer Creek: Channel and construct pavement'-.within the .easements to the satisfaction' of the Couctiy Flood. Control District. i l 6. The devil oiler shall acquire the necessary, dedication and construct the north one*half of Banyan. Street. from the Weer ? Creek Channel Bridge to and including the intersection of agreement to recover the costs of constructing request a reimbursement Milliken Avenge' The deVelo er i othstructing the offsite improvements from future ,development of the properties located on the north tide of Banyan Street. Offsite, parkway improvements may be ,deferred until development of the adjacent property. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, `W& PLANNING cowisSIOm OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CuumoNGA BY: arry . McNiel. Chal.rman ATTEST: Brad u er.n re ry 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning .Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the `foregoing Resolution was ,,uly and regularly 'introduced, passed, and .adopted by the Planning Co4dssi6n of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the;Planning Commission:held on the 27th day, of 'September, 1989Y by the following vote-i^-wits AYES: commiSSIONERS: HOES CO MISSIONERS., ABSENT: ' C"I,SSIONERS: Original F'©ar Q uia.,1 Cy Aft � y i! $ t w .� ¢vim s�r ,`u• ••a. `q o$� q ``d .a ate# o0 _, e +Jew -«d� �a". o'Qi 'L•.,'u, O ga 6 p ` Q Irl r�R �Y✓ qL� GM .LC.p BOA 4 N ...'� C • L LAN L6C .aOa LY' - {��tl� _Gr ON # M • O ® {. o "` ti N a> ZE Tz =pR _ Via• -e F � 84_ 1 rW / Y•e M D1+ y+ = Ul� I.:, .swF3a U as ASg 9$$ J[ 6 L� •!+r A i 6 N M - ` 4, .gip$•[ • •+� �� Y Z W W w 4 EYO �- 4N y�M yi p S tl w va :.q 8 V:. M �9 lw N• • ,J His !_ 'ca 02 e y e g 5� 7,1 � 6.aatl.a WK V—p N l t��7 L YSJ CO ti = �➢I. .�:�. ry ZE 21 $YY is O 4$ p ` u— .xpY ` aia pq Ca �w �g py ai Ni C`. OvN d'g~ '�lkYt4y,sq 95 — 0.5 M I+j C CITY OF RANruz.:j.;:UCA.MONGA <- . STAB' a REPORT DATE: Septenber 27, 1989' TO ChItirman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad-Buller; City Planneri BY: TGm 'Grahn, -Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSNLMT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-23 - RM CHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AG NCY'- The development of a; fire station, maintenance facility, training center ' and trainit- tower totaling 36,328 square feet on `7.08 acres of land in the Minimum Impact .Heavy. Industrial Oistrict (Subarea .9) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at'the southwest corner;of the proposed extensions of Jersey Boulevard, and `Milliken Avenue - APN';; 229-111-23.., I. PROJECT AND SITE OE56 IIPTION: A. 'Action Requested_ =APprov,al' of a Conditional Usei;Permit, detailed site plan, grading plan. landscape plan, ;building elevations, and the issuance of a Negative:0eclaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonlin: North - Vipant; Minimum Impnt Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) South - Existimj industrial building, vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 10) East Vacant; Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial,(Subarea 9) West Existing industrial buii'ding; minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) C. General Plan Deesionatio�ns: roJect to - Heavy n ustrial North Heavy Irdustriai !` South General Idustrial East Heavy Industrial West Heavy Industrial 0. Site Characteristics:, The project site is currently vacant and vegetation consists of, native grass and weeds. The site is relatively flat, sloping approximately two (2).'percent from the northwest. The site is bounded to the north by the future extension of Jersey Boulevard, to, the ,east by the future extension of Milliken Avenue,: and to the south and west by an ' existing'railroad spur: ITEM R' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89 -23 _RC REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Septem64r 27, 1989,' Page 2 E. garkinO` Calculations: Parking requirements for, the fire station were based upon a twenty-four '(24) hour shift consisting of twelve (12) firefighters, and one (1) Battalion . Chief. "file fol',lowl ng, summarizes parking spaces 'provided at Fire Station No. 4: >ts Pha-! I- -Phase II `Total�T f. ,4 Visitor 12 0 12 . Personnel a; y.' 14 28 42 Total 26 28 54 FI Applicable Requlations The Industrial Area .Specific Plan permits fire station uses within the Heavy,3ndustriai District (Subarea 9), subl ct to a Conditional Use Permit. r. II. ANALYSIS: A. General. This prodect will :be built in. two phases. ?ha$e I will consist of"'the primary station facility, a p6ht1r:r)of the internal circulation pattern, and street improvdmenes alongAft Jersey Boulevard and Milliken Avenue (see" Exhibit i$819. Phase 11 will consist'of the-district maintenance center, a training center, and a training tower. This application contains only . building eleaation!:JO Phase 'I. The current develop*nt proposal consists of the primary station, facility totaling 18,128 square feet. Th'e facility will be `constructed of brick blocks (4 x 8 x 12. inch block size) in a red-brick with accent 'color bands. Additional architectural features include a say tooth roof ;and recessed entryways; learJing to the apparatus roamacility atn3ties v6thi�l t4iis (sf�ase' include`living gtarters''for thil^teeri'-'(18) people, exercise facilities, library, training ,room, and front office. B. D�esiignnRReview Committee: At various times, all members of the aPl nning Commission have had the opportunity to review the proposal.` the following comments summarize, their concerns: Architecture 1. The 'initial proposal utilized brick blocks in a 4.x 8 x 16 inch.size. It was requested that smaller brick blocks be used to resemble standard bricks. The architect indicated that' 4 x 8 x 12 inch size brick blocks- ire', available and will be used 'n th 4 7 e revised elevations; . r a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REpORT CUP 89-223 - RC REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY September 271 1989 Page 3 2. auflding details including- the, standing brick lintel, columns; , the',entrance"to the, apparatus room, additional "el, , det3iU69 �at the windows and, doors; and the,:;.project• peCimeter` wah": will .require additinnaje ew. A condition in the Resolution of apppoval w1l4frequire the :. projrect details to be,MiAed and approved-by-the-,Qes-iq Review 'Committee or to the ssuaoce of u,114"ng perm3tsr J,... -. 3. The :tower+,element on the south'vost .building elevation Should be detached from . the primary facility and relocated ,to the:, inter.iori courtyard located'bettreen the primary;facility,-the maintenance center and the training center. The tower element is no longer part of Phase I and will be reviewed with.Phase 11. }� Site Alan (1 1. Additional landscaping should be,,) provided along the northwest elevation of; the primary;fgAlity adjacent to , the., intersection of Jersey ,,Boulevard and Milliken Avenue. The building shoslld.be framed with large Canopy trees to soften the buff ;ing appearance, c,e A decorative pavir19/%dnding treatment should be provided pat avirxJth driveways(ita break up the large expanses of Other j} E, 1. All equipment should`le-ground mqunted 'and should be adequately screened by landscaping and lose decorative walls. C. Environmental,_Assessment; Part •I:of the"".Initial .study,.:has, been comp ete y the applicant, Staff has completed"pa*t I1 Of the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. 111. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In •order, to approve the Cdnditional Use s ermit, the Co. 1 sion u.ould.,need to make the following fi>ndings.;,. I, That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, <f the objectives of the Industrial Specific_Plan;11:and the" purposes of.the 'district in which the site is located. PLAgNING COMMISSION. STAFF REPORT CUP,89-23 - RC.,REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY September 27 1989, - Page 4 2.. That the, proposed use, together With the conditions appiicahl� thereto, will not be tletrimental to the public health, safety, or welfaref or, materially injurioµs, to properties or ifiprovements in the yicitt It 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the appiicable.provisions of the Tndustriai'Specifi"c Plan. . IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a,public hearing in The_Dai yRe ort :newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to all,:property owners within 300 feet of the pr63edt site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respp tful,ly sub fitted, ter,. Brad Buller City Planner BB•TG:mlg t. Attachments: Exhibit "A" -,Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B -'Site'Plan Exhibit 11V - Grading Plan Exhibit OV - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" Building Elevations Exhibit. "F1','_- Architectural Reodering`%df Fire Station No. 4 Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions i i i f 5 F •��ti 4 i Ej t LL_.:k���G.��, _��IYIC CIMTCP',4 f" s•rt , �_`�1 ARROW PYC six 9 CITE OF-RANCHO "CL1CA M®NGA IT EI4L "" " PL, i�1VING O"TON EXHM A61L h'Q:19 � j • r d./�� u_ r------- -- I O a AT" mu taua t 1.62'AC.. jERSEY BLVD. p0¢.4 `o c. of 4 td.04AC ' r VACANf I F633A tag ec ' q i 21 . °.• S aers#uu.tsw�n acz — _���_ EIGHTH STREET �! \ aasraul, rcctrw �iy per I 36 .+.nrxul 13.32 AC PORT p u �' --r " .--36P&C'" r •I 9 a PdG I ��a L1• !=L CIW OF RA14dtO kAMONG':A TTEIV PLANNING D"ION EMlBlT.A e&CA . dA t ii ASIA WTwr�" ,��♦` AW � l .10 IN TMCA iq f7 ^ 1� • Y�I+, 1.000< ` r -al 'r• wse v , f f P t UG.D"IOCTr ME EXHII3T"T: SCALE: f 1`. r f FT ibi r''.- ;'RVi �. �.-` �� � ,,>w,• ,y�� ..w ` J�N+I�ff �y{j` \k GA MC WfflBj--" SCAT :I r. y ii P g >q kn s y Ai > x a LA kxF >x z S -+ I'M GEC ; A 4, z TO a _ i �:t' 1 1 faM Ot- �...,x yllElER r ` Rum four pE[ -rErrr. ffeN IrEE W YM iri11i � ` Jrrrt EI�jE E lYEI AHR I{" Oi1Xf �I ��vsy - }�{{ 1 /YT,�1 ���rt •'� gs "�^.�a I�e�,ya�X�lri�ii.1, .L V 1"!l 1'•�'!�A t *'IN ®�01 Im }�`' I•i*€�i�1f +."�I�fATy�r'+,e-r��a2ri!a_r� ��;r } 4 tt7}fr�. Y ���'.+ ,, .a;T�l.+•� �.l5� -1+X`mtf t�.y��"'r;�t�+ ?„fit.}�'� T • C' RESOLUTION NG A RESOLUTION OF THE 'PLANNING COMISSION OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT F NO. SM3 FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A FIRE STATION, MAINTENANCE FACILITY,,' TRAINING CENTER AND TRAINING TONER TOTALING 3b 328 'SQUARE FEET, i';CLUDING SPECIFIC DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR PHASE. I, ON 7.08 ACRES 44I,F LAND' LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED EXTENSIONS OF JERSEY BnULEVARD PAID MILLIKEN AVENUE IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY � INDUSTRIAL. FjTSI. 10 (SUBAREA 9) 01 THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN, SUPPORT THEREOF - APNc 229-111-23. A. Recitals. (I) The Rancho Cucamonga" Redevelopment Agency, has filed an application_ for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 8943 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, ` the subject- Conditional Use Permit request is referred io' as "the application,'. (11) On a 27th of September, 1989, tha Planninp Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly roticed pub!,. hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (II ) All legal' prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, NOWT THEREFORE, it 1s htY..'Ny found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the iity of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recital,", Part A, of this Resolution are trua and ,correct. 2. Eased upon- substantial evidence presented to this' Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 2?, 19, 9,' including written and oral staff' reports, together with, public testimony, ,this Commission hereby specifically finis as follows- (a) The application applies to property located on Parcel�c of Parcel Map 11891, with a street frontage of 600 feet along Jersey Boulevard and a street frontage of,835 feet along Millik-tn Avenue, the project site is currently vacant; and (b) The property to the north and east is vacant and'-has been master planned for industrial development, the property,to the south and weirt contains existing industrial buildings; and ,j # PLANNING COMMISSION'RESOLUTION NO. CUP 89-23 - RE[J!W7i`.;PMENT AGENCY September 27,, 19L9' Y Pa9e, 2 (c) The a{iplication addresses the master plan for development of a fire station„ `maintenance facility, training center and' training tower, however, the application' only contains design review of Mase I building elevations. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comnisson i during the above-referenced f public hearing and-upon the"s`pecfic fnc;ings of I tacts, set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above., this-Cgiission hereby lands and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the GenertA Plan, the objectives of the Industrial Specific.P:�`an, and the purposes of the -district �. in which the site is lq�ated. (b) That the proposed use, gether with the conditions applicable thereto, will :got be detrimental to'the public healthy safety, nr 1fare',.,rx materially injurious to properties or improvements in the, vicit�ity�. ,Y y (c) That the :'proposed usr, complies with;each of tf^,, plicable provisions of the Industrlal-Specific PT-h,i 4, This Zomiss ion'hereby finds and, certifies that the project has been. reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5, Based' up)n the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, thin Commission hereby approves the application subject � to each and every cr, ;}4on t forth below` and in the attached Standard J Conditions, attached a,ais<+ ;ncorporiad herein by this reference. J Pla+.ning Division: (1) The 'brick block used in; the building elevatioins ' shall be a 4 z $ x„12.och"block`size. - (2) Additional building details including, but. not limited to,' the standing'Ibrick 'lintel colu,nns at the entrance to the apparatus room,' additional detailing at the windows and,doors and the project perimeter r: 1 shall be reviewed and approved by,the Design Revierr Committee prior-' to issuance, of building permits. (3) Additional laodsl api..;1 shall be provided along the r 'northwest elevat-,=ds-the primary facility, adjacent to the intersection.of Jersey Boulevard and Mil'l'iken Avenue. Large canopy trees shall be used to frame the building to soften its appearance, The r' additional laridscaping and, canopy trees shall be PLANNING COWW ISSI40 RESOL';TION NO CUP-89-23 'REDE'VELOPMEN,Y'AGENCY' Septe:gr,'27, 1989 Page 3 shown ,on the larIscape and- i"Ylgation plans i:^ be; rev iewed and ap{+,.vved by t'r�e City Planner_prior to the ,ssuance o building permits: � (4) fl decorative paving/bandskng treatment shall be. pra ided at both driveways to break up' large uses of paving, sOJect toreview and. approval _ > <.?ie City Planner. i' (5) All equipment shall -be grou'od WJu0te6-ind shall be adequately sc.'ee>>ed by l nd'scapitg and low de orative.Walls AI,y landscape screentag shall be shown on 'trio---landsrraPe :and ,irrigati6n plans, to;be reviewed and approved bpi the City:',lanner priclr to;, issuance of building ylerinIts. R (6) Phase lI ,.shall.. require separate design review approval i-n tt�e future, (7) The tower -element on ' the southwest, building elevation shall, be detached from the primary facility, :and r4located to the interior courtyard. located between the primary facility, the maintenance center and:,the training center. The tower element is no"ioi er part of Phase I and will, be r6viewed,wiO Pt,Ase II. Engineer_isq"Division: Special Conditions: (1) Conditions of Approval for Parcel Map 11891 shall. apply to the project. (2) Landscape along `future Milliken Avenue small be its accordance with the City°s landscape master plan for Milliken Avenue. (3) Drainage facilities shall be provided for the sits to the satisfattibn of the City Engineer as follows: a) Drainage areas shall-be consistent witt' the approved hydrology stu;iy for Parcel tia.0 1.1891. b) Interium drainage facilit-ies shall be constructed conS.iderng the Ultimate conditions. E 6. The Secretary tc thiS COMnissioia shall certify =to the adoption of :t this Resolution. 1 Y PLjgUtNG r bmiSSION RESOLUTION NO \ CUFF,89-23 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY September 27, 1989 Page 4 r? APPROVED: AND AOOPTEO IRIS 27TH DAV OF'SEPTEMBER, !(I PLANNING'-GCMISSIQN OF THE CITY OF.RANCHO CUCAMONGA Larry McN el, Chairnan. ATTEST: Brad Bul lei,- ecre tars . r , I, Brad Buller,, Secretary of, fi t'i n ing Gomnission of the City of Rancho CueamonCatj do �+ rehy ceRty.ry teat the foregoing Resolution was .duly, and regular introdu'Led, a� ed, �itl adopted by the PIanninq Commission of the City of Rancho Cucarta�a, at�a regular meeting of the Planning Commission!zwld on the 27th dayro �eptetrber' 1989, 6y the following ua'lem2044f: AYES: COMMISSIONERS:, NOES., COMMISSIONERS: i ABSENT: COt+MIS510�=' S41 y: 1 _ v �, f , r 3r5`'!= Q-,! a: Ne�9p as Qef .c w w, uc��uu 4u 'c.'�e'4o�=�:+� n+' 2`07- Be f At�'•"^i' 8r�o c'1i's'�` - 'C. A p®pnw rra+goy?Sf+'iee 'rZ.,.p5 AOLs SMI Yf qm�w a�" E O 43, ff VNQ5•V qC QGr Y F TCflr '3A Y u q aa CrY 4�.SrNE 'S Npuy K.F CQ y5 y GS YgVY 5 ¢¢.dOA S Lp; �Yyi]d dr•S '$CVVI is.! L N w 'D f f y}J{ �l O fR L! � y�1 p N Otlbd. ® L Q ..^C6l4 YVM' ALYv a �CLgrSW^ y �Y udQ 3�..YV CL�O .aid O �•L$d $`RNws^.;� ^LLeui$s�d a, ad' cEv AS' N �tl.. "1 d f Y q� vy�ay�o R'La� N p;yy cN .z aA'tp•,q•) {�.P� q� 14 $V� p L q4 appJJ y.NLL pw W L Ly 0g ` Lsp . TqZ µ'q Cf V1 p�+(O� L01f3 uS c0.�y�~ N �pIDYN G4'a- Y �t 6laN VQ-4c .9 "E'als "~9 4r i Qll S,V 4 d r r N a.i.• tl,ae.e E .� N :E a+• S� .L4 V w ;�EaM'•'F N �Cf.S y vg C y�� ��g N w f 9�y� V iiiiYYYYy aaY ���O�V C- Y ,G-�3r T' u'O NC }a� M'Nc aEm QV r.s u.g �^' u�yy a♦icNp/d d nc y•�« Ha�c �,®a. Nc I. v B�tlpt1^-.��{t��G C N� Cr �Nwa qfy. ifid ��Mtl �L VV Nbu I pMVC.L i,��Nyfff111{Y{...0 u'�hL�.YNV TACCO Krr Mr L Y ssY�VW0.6 L\1`43tw• O' 00?N pdty f , A� d prq} eq v¢i�G of C a o v Lag N V Y G�tl y V0 9 0 w G to ly qp C4 AY gaS"VY' L 2 WZ. ��� �� ,�r Vic! Q' p pC �` YMY Cam; •� ® �O� Q' i 9 Y .c.2 q3pB SHI IGdyTu yp YOQmyf OF�pq yVy : �et':�Y M� O 11 Y y��� �� J Al - C> �. myag9 y it yo.o .r j y y. >. oa4 .ro �kl LAJ 37- C�°'N1. YpAg Y M t C 01 OI C a µ � S vac v.. Y a '� fl. g" 9 S t vaT... at ^q�CN oyy aN YYw��Mr» 9a ul �{(((C fJ 11�N y���f a R�p@p^peuau"Erna� Y[L,pN T� YT p OY ��� M_C ��yy� N t)O 'OL�T6._..A�� T y. C •t a ;N MN yY 6N; C�pp'f CC A .�. C� .. \�/ q�O�pL �9�Y �t$$t 21.Y c tom' A�.OLO Via. 66O«Qy yr C:�N "« I K E M.p^O C N p M Nq ,4�W NA Y-a 1 " µ pV O.y SS A N ais MO ' c�p phi yyes.,; �Sy aay.y L LTCN dTT Y` "n' uv �+ cv t' VW ?� q�w O��N "'T 0 yyyy'�"yN1y CQ a MSC61 N. WO Lt O�.�u LLL L q�.0. w '1t ; ff11'�Y�N r"tG0 1iM YVy1 Ly-S Y ® MB y Lo'R O jjjGGGf�� Gy k. � ►- ON Sy.N Opff Apo W f1 S4 �yq ` Y.ptl MC WC �,. Patpl ,V N:9L �b `iilG y�L y@V "^Q p4���p 1pg�tO pyNp�� W Ne"4; M9N�� .1�.r� Ma- 4y 0.� 7»)B CL�w S ON yp Ng Ca ••� ` �B.�YyNppyy Qg yt�V O. YOf{YL, ttU f: V• i To 9 C� 4 w�C O®O as yG9GN OV.N yf w 3::Ijuk 29 K.N. n ��j ypm9 CC� 6 O Q Y 0 .�. M�.S6uL.w..+� . Ow: L C OP 4. -'LCI ^ 1T p �t L L Y 6 aT=�d bs yV �q��. �w r a� �.lS 41 �a�yY q4 pAp E gpY'rl y i1 jr,Cy] ® `y tlY pM Vyl^ .p MCAGO NS y¢`ysp1 NV 4 r s�a C�OL� sQ$ir�:G a+� y�� El W. -'S'004` 1� ^CdiY( SK � ML rJ O G YYatK L � VP~ m p9S� ^CV .- CCwuC 9gyy • L 6 1.OiV •Wpn0 CC L-� 46 P •w YpQ M Y LY�O "L; Y OC� Or iO.tf Nw�gV �N^� h� � Sp CYC CttN g1 P OOy q Q Y Q _, P�y Q N R O=n �r. r•V 6 p 4 T O O Z L f.�` :q W N pp cc {N� C y V O�pC Y I• 'C: Ly �41.V. L��oAt4•:OgO���. �$��� � ��aTq LLt H H D N 5 4 5 • ` ?' S$, .'N" tz 3V NV WY �yy� �yy yA Y�y. �q 'gSoYS,.DYM p� �,CY S:q V4j T • VY qw NL V^� pq WN=M. pV�f1 bO.NNW ~dCNC 1. N4Ga ^01�4i COL, .VL001 ,C'• O i. 1 �q OON �LQ�. Q�. '.' CpNAt _ u�JISR."Eta" G wp On: Yuy =SG. CYco C }C}�j]{{..C.�w WC 4Q NO. qN W ANN.O WYC�� yp OwY �N f 11. LQ ti N OIO{ pLQo� �R� YC' (N'CL q~ C��te�NSRO 4.w OIL■■N :y4�C �M Y1[Ih V 0 Y4 y o..ylt �+LLt•l O: .`tQ v YR'�L.Vvom�p'8'^: C�Q.�V. Ne. C`q Vey. >'' Gi. b t «L u �M W 2 . •T p Y C {� cp p� _ 21'B M M N W L� L. '�+' `G ®O ■Qw � -R9N a 4 C V d4N—N L Op.63� �ZML 1yYVL11�MNggLm1 7gNL _/l NL /R Vp LYN,,yCCO.':.M � 4MW Vq rNyWr-N WY.Z^O t�Y gwI MOo� CL�myyGCg,YOyy! NN -I R. LNG AC�_ ICMS~Yw?G9..iy11y C4W��k�9f w"•."9�o �Mw�VElw3yOO YGGG. �••W_LJ: atlw-V6 IC V. 4.�A 6N --8 CG VLN �9+N SO Mls 6 N� q 40 C> 4M`wG.•YNm+P�� ��$o�GN�C !■a■�� 'yM.IIyx rN Oi•i �b qGLCp pL .211y C`� LpCY�44 0$r1.bsVNl':aqL cdmsN L GOr _ HIS 0 H YwO C yy^ m! OV y iR zY. .Ok N Cm� YLtl C. 0 � Z1Y w y Lwp L. y w«pw R Nam } '^'.3 �"�'•«�! 774/�"=�� _ z'......�� ' L 5� a Ps�L 8 w N w�,,,P,-�o M p88$$''�'S'y""N N V.a- - PN� :1 V :'.�A1 �'. N VOp. 0 ` �a'.�, s .A �Y Y a A y 'Qu iHHp1 SSY.VO y !^" � t, Jqqi N iS cc�.S~61 L PTMY pl�y ��u py Q..y�Y.Lqq �`yQ • C�O ' O.~( 'OVS� iw. SOpC...A.8 4TLCe�Y p`,YYC, N 1 ry • mg 'C w 177 q ��y" {I �N YO. C^ Y S �,V�MNY NC •f M:«p ugs 9gEs C N.f. i' �gtl .ate .®..PgY 1.04�.. pgL3y+1W' L `pGGt' $ � ,dm0(i N:S �s ..'a "g �.*3s9! pCNP L.dm�g "' q M..• ` LYN Naag�� Q�LOp psm Cy. � ^may.`•� �_tl H L PY. _ N 1_N�p�- p{1 e Oy m'Opq L KNO Cl.O•� A 4O N. K6/ KO 'YGNMA O T L(s� N sv�U. ' � y- Y yy }a u G-C 41 ! G S.e -X it p Oil Ed._- uu JyCCy iOpG Ypp cc O ^ LS 3 3�OM CYYMypy C 'Ly VYSC V o4 GY= As Me'Lagg O � � ���^ ��YiS tea. C ON Im vLt=Y.yi L'L« N V A s w0'Y.Ca 3 OIL a 009 LIwA OIA^YY N— y ��4 LSm,2 E5..Myu '..a :;.. d a q g P .O y Y Y ��� uoG$r aLo Sw� �po Mr�'_ AL +4opc a .,LGa nCC. ttf i u>GU VgVOY M :uT Yw= cu CC �` yOp MY� �Y1Oii atl4 � r�y $.�-«A.$ ',Cv _, �4 +. N i O CC SAS `ter n Pam« :o a'ds 'Q rs ^GtJ`I. L fld " CY . :€Wvw .i� «,uaYg �f:o S ai n:~a �•'•a.�Q6 o... q..a tx o, VL ,..ya tivv.Y'v,0 Y am "- Ts� sa c :G� erty M .Y.iS `�, a` R YY !i 'G . c"a a « r.�K`�'a, N mqy� VLC CG—L�.Lp Y�aA j.. ��ytl NLY� N 6Y6 pLp��a.��Jlm® N4LG �S-My' Lw9../ p y.Y i4..G. Y 4 i W —CAC�.CY Y yy�L�C�pp t—t O. 2p rY Y PyO ww. /1� -O ppY. O.4 d a 3 #M X •V.V 40� `6Y .1 L Ivy6.:FOB y..a F �sIV dJ Gib @w Y y s v o c aQ{L u • V e. St. 2a*aw 13 ^qY , Q _9 y-N 01 9 O P P _ ®N aA Ed. Q .�uNS ^c�gCN :figu 4 V _ eq Gm Lq Oyp YY_ ' ' p�CC � � ~C• Yy � prNC�Lea $N «` 5p« Z� � a a r S to �L � 6 tl 9 a. a P a O»�O�9 4 � >p: N ryy b am g ' 6 Y« a• 6Lm a j Y I y 9 6p4 Y g. LVC. y� M Go C^+ L • y q ilia C 0 t3 S Lp P w~ -w ^ M e p 5r a� � as Qd cis>� "Yq4 a GqC C6 „}�{ wad. ^ « H �+ N^ M pl &y 'cc agNZ p uu cq. �� o� a:� }N�-t Y s0�� o^�J, a_� «liw°iwS.. wy��coo-. 1— aO�tl M �:. QqQ 161. d � �—p 71_W Oii q �y. Cy W p y� Q q 010¢a- Orr O w 4 Yg ■ p y M N x^ 91L L... L r �1i �$f .�I..L■� YP e6 G V NP — 1M.Y. Yl�.� �Yd.� oL N 6 L6 N n L �rW �"°� u .yw yyK. ST Y Q..9e WMI % LLB `�Na V Mbo+: big wM o �. t�f vev,c -5 CY n � deb iN ad is a. i2 L s ;ate o 3 »o�-a$.5 % I-sz a.Nq. a d .lam $2S wd: ,�_ ac v'—� m a� a;: as'in 'cps � �..v. .A A'+ag� gym.. L. 9vCt N+ ^p eg�a'� t/1 C 4'AG� ^qK4�Q �yo p`1' }� M' fI. ylI Is nI' 1 Ca OC... G mC m p e.wn 0n OY0af.N. c^ '� .GGrs`� G C��wIS L �m ^N. «PO Y Yaa4 ..C. L +Y9� S=' }� p q` ` � sq-ado A f1GgC �P o41�gm Pe� S^ LO Yam. H pqC mom.mAp 00 � N NNNM Jai Qwi ul ao ±fi e K n as •.. 'olu— nosh es Iz E.9 "'I V, A. .. K m sn —� ♦3 Y®,� uw— '..®� O Otl Mpg[Ytl �4 4 .: A ZILO�Ld� Is ZL am RZ gqprra .ajav�N� —�^ _g P e r3� A4 Pa G6 y ^� �MK �J. K pn_ 6 9 y K�.yts NY y NP KWO t7`tYwH�4- WNO6�.:.4� 4�. N '-o`p`o L° �u bCv�' $ -a wtar$a u a� � $ Pq'. $•`Y f�L t/COI V.0 y�y rCp S W.:6C p Q C O ♦• O 4 `L ,VG Y$� d�V VyVy� O `G YV Cd�Y A 9 i4 yy QQ: {LAM IL Y -a N:w'�:to ppiara'. np wF. e8E2 M. 2 S I{yT y aC � «p a�oQ� ,,CCn NS�Gry/ `LL Lp� r� SS. C,CH. dY HV yya yy`ee ti.,. pm cz gYMN 61r 6w.V N C yMa4• M i M`� �C C Cam^ C =CI Uw N Va�ll``. QQ a CCQQ ,5ao ae $ e's �� �NyLN vim •`• aw i cEY L2 L W O A~=leYy d 'yam+HYOtt"YV aCSan_L$�Uc 1:NL:. NdL pf 6$O1_NN'.V« AdN�C V{COy 1 'g+cn Meat an q a. .wL. �p e ~�p. : �uu q co Yv—iG pN` ®® q �N. n ' e3ea V wpo WMpI S FU Na` oprdQ�$ <GN •� s , m, « S4 d CL MY LNa�,G4 S« $a4 6) V.M Y O yO.o �.® Oil Y y Cii C V M O iC 80 r�YC,C�7 C0. s 31 i.- TE gilsa h __� �;M s_„rEli�N ,u p�p¢ L 4}� '�<^ 1♦gam Y _ Lm Y Ayy- dwY Ef ��Y i F St® dS� 1M�Y � +Lp«Nn � yY' +N+,YG pA yy tY q qg gq _yy Q� y p B�'L 4t ll 4 V9� 46 U � `��7Mjj` •�H ; �:^, 4®� m d a .: N ri 'u E��i a• kA ho i � I l �I tip= � ��► 1rr{{ N t o� _8 vEL }8 ca ^ L 03 ads � Y^ C$ NL O O � .+a e_ CL aLL L rd c 'cu . ^ e^ t1Q GG um 1 h AdIL be w A G 2erC�=�... tRL�Yy♦'... LuYu Y p., �a M.... V ��W N w Y.0 MON Q Cp' L `r3 pV O 4 fix= Y I j § na �" tYyJ''' OL C-'_... aM V - fcy�y+s oVy » ` w; Nsp 6p Cee�.. R�� ULk wt . YY �w wyo • 2 4 2.40 Y r yyrr � `w pcO® YY�f3. qqP �NYS� ~ L^ Y� aO yY Y .+ : tl�~ _ QQ a..6 p�rt C, 8fL_X. sp } t S map a E r �G3 'o Oc N0 cq y 8 y >>>ix, X11 Yy b.0 "Vfix" -Ypp«�_».ppa.' ave gs �d 9 7 M qq w pp 'OD C N s+O <N MW 71� <WO.-0so : ag CrrY O>~RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATES September 27, 1989 TOa Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Bei1er,'City Planner -` BY: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner [;Van Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENI-111ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 89-02C - FU1U1zE ESTATE 'INC w, A request to amend the General, Plan Land Use Map from Office to Medium density residential (8-14 dwelling units per, acre) for 3556 acres of land located at,the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street, The City will also consider Neighborhood Commercial and Low'Medium density residential as appropriate alternative designations. APN 1077-332_. 26. y ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND IDEVELOPMENT ' DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 89-04 - FUTURE ESTATE. INC - A request to + amend the Development District heap from "OP" Office/Professional) to "M" (Medium density, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 3.556 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue andl Church Street. The City Dill also consider "NC" (Neighborhood Commerciai) and IiIM" (tow Medium) as appropriate alternative distr�ia s. - APN: 1077-332-26. h` The applicant ha r s requested that th is q, item be continued to the October 11, 1989 meeting, Thrs request. .has, been made to allow additional time for discussions with the Centra?School District regarding concerns over potential impacts on school` services resulting from the proposed action. Staff concurs With--ilkis,-'requ-2st. Res ully su Brad r City'Pl nner BB:AW:js ITEMS L &�`A ,UTURE ESTATES and DEVELOPMENT ply, 61 16 PLAZA, 7711 Center AY ,Suits M Huntington Beach,Cai'domia 92Ba7 {7t4y.89t-865i6 � ,.�� OMY 00 RAN=WOM3MR ye bivt�ilu��,iF�kt� September 19, 1989 SEP ry Mr. Alan Warren Associate Planner - City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 8Q7 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91.729 Reference, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89702C (GPA 89-02C) 'DEVELOPMENT.DISTRICT XIENDMENT 89-04 (DDA$9-04) Dear Mr. Warren This letter Is to formally request a continuance on the above referenced amendments until the Qctober ll� •1989 hearing. J% lie are -requesting q sting this continuance in order to give 9p4�_4taff the time to discuss the overcro:e_ing situation with the elementary school district. tie appreciate your coofgratlon in this matter and should you have any questions regarding this request, please do not how tat? to contact me. qw Thank you. ,ZVery truly -yours, FUTURES & DEVELOPMENT President [ Ki/cio S' �N, Y, r� i� iy !— fy1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT a DATE: SepteO er '27, 1989 TO: Chairman and Rephers of the Planning Commission, FROM: Brad Buller, City_Planner SUBJECT: ADVERTISING REGULATIONS FOR AUTO SALES CENTERS I. BACKGROUND: On September 6, 1989, the City Council 9oted 3=z to for►vard to the Planning Commission;, a request ,W eonside:,: amend ants to the advertising regulations for auto sales centars. The City Council discussed several options, but determined not to forward a specific direction at this timeTlbut rather to request that the Commission consider the benefV and options of amending the ;Sign Ordinance for ,auto sales centers. Because auto sales centers `►ave the ability to be an excellent financial resource to the City, this is a use we would like to attract to Rancho Cucamonga. LI. ANALYSIS: 'Staff has made some initial contacts with the cities of Cerritr, Pomona, Tustin, Montclair, and Upland. We have discovert4 that it is very common to have special .provisions for auto sales ,centers. The Sign Ordinance can be amended.to allow for the pmparation 44 special sign programs for auto sales' centers. Thee programs can be tailored to the specific location and architectureof each,separate center. Another option would be to address specific regulations,wj`.hin.the Sign Ordinance itself that would define specific sizes and types: of'signs that are permitted for auto sales centers, The Council also requested that the option, of °no change at this. time° be presented to the Commission for consideration. The last option staff rill present at this initial considerations by the Commrission is similar' to the first option mentioned above. The. only difference is that consideration might be given " to only allowing speClil sign Programs for auto centers that are within the I-15 corridor, on Foothill Soulevard',:.or at any other. specific location Beamed appropriate by the Commission and Council. I I ITEM 0 V_,'Ary NUAr c +ilssaoN STAFF REPO.RT ADMU-SING REGMATIONS FOR' AUT© SALES CENTERS_ 4 ge tember 27 298g; Page 2, r t IIr. STAFFECOMhiEMDAT;QtV Stagy recommends that the Pt'aonina Comrmission,'jconsider the infor" at-on presented and either,46termine that an amendment. is_appropriate„and .direct staff to prepav,4 an amendment for" Comm ssion.".consideratian or .determine that no amendment,should be ,oursued at this :time.:. In either,,.case, staff will alert the Cit 'Council, of-bhe Commiss;an's t��cisien before any action would be takeo., Res 1,1y s ted,' Br B ' r ; City arrner BBcgs ;. 5 n , 5� 14 (' f : aZ2;1 V. � i r ri En OZO ® ft9a In FE a ® !I 03 y� s ma �r ��- 4�I���err Y•r .. • e o 'ems/ !^702 C� a3 o .c Me m a 1 CD, ;m pa .� ROCHESTER AVE, 4 ^<g<C-tozovzs.rxS.47�nfonW•P �r.✓r/1 L 1 to Cs O CO a v v GS.. •�L� _ IL ": 'N Grt{]Vf$'N .iZZ z+I�4Niz'TNNKV�_1N V) CD—CCD �-• 4/ ZE.. t.. LQ 11'�` saiilit - t{,li� i - r - _i;_. �r 1 { gc r )l g ' i Y� C, 1 r f r< � t ^ Z 1l J r ,3 Y� V ifl 11 J�+ ,� �� � st t ,. .; ��;. ��. ;, _ }f �� �k .. ,, _ .., �� �� �, �� ,. �� �� ..r � E� �� �. � � ��` � � ' � y. ti . a �, � „ _;� a ��. . _ _ ,_!i_. .. ;i L1 1 ti e{'� ��'/ r^r jtl F z a milco ! ;Q 9 i, 1� (5 1 ,t -0; I �� cS 40 �J is f �d , ^`9 ct a S l � 1 l _ t . t 1 1` �•, r� i i RR � n c� if 1 Q t I � t 4 y t � l 1 { t r. t c „ y v., tk V a tl re1. � a . r 1 i I 1•�.1 l� V ` �uJ � 7� r�) �� �r "` s rf r *.� ,G �,1� 17 G _ � ,..; � r"�� �l ,'.. —M � t . ..z — _ — — � + _ __ w' �--''1 � G i� ` — '� X^l, i� i+ �i J .�, ,.� r �. �� f _ ,. fir% i � G jj t, .�� \f_ f1 r,� �r (` �.r.: �'� �' � ;j�� ,r t. ,/� f� 2� � e^�._ � � � �l:� �� 1 i. ,i .�. �. ',. .... �'� �e g� �: r, rr ;.}. �i .._ 0 P _' . J w J 'i - �. .. ,> i r �+ � �� � ��wi � ����2 �� '� �rr'�-r ' �, it ,(F1_a He i tilt 4`� r+v LJA oca 1 f7 z } �ti P q � C p 4x. � '�. � � .� � '�, +► tip �t� J't r LyR ! h 1 aW# . Y S r„� C s+ d� a♦ n `+.� �, '�_ '� :'' .4:. s� S a lw y t6�N a� t 1 - 1 � ��r � x t a � e � t I d s 1� ► � i �i r .R Y�1�r: s� � �;z r e 3• '�'"y„ 1 '� � e'' + ak 3�''y � � t ' f a t j t + t k xt ti,(t N Hj 1 A Y`�, L -54 i y •�zi Kt L t t '�i lti, a 4S ..- 'fi'� ♦ �y �- r�W-t �p �•t,� ! iw �Y X)� �� ! .a ^A j V e�z� i at a� x+ pw r s <r _ z ..Y 1 n13 Ct if y , y�yq a J 1� SJ r } y Ny J Al rt rp 3A g S a o ❑ - � s A ❑ — -" Cr �. s K r,> �Y n . 4 IV ❑ d ° ❑ . o ❑ Al ❑ a i f t, i {Y Lt F' J .., U r r.� 1 1 r f� r r � r .i r r J. w� -T; C � _ J ,f }14 It UJtF{� i i G � fl 1� >1 G a, Am fillI lit r. fig _ P3 _ yt i s - j �t F� all u i 7 l C r Y I � 1 -- - --c-j I it L} d r r1. It � 1 I IL 1 C� . � 1 t= I f l i r tiV 4w/J t' r iF 2 4'r f,. 3, t _ t. _ �? `.. e i) ti (1 ll i „ t ,y. 2 rr LAC tz � 4� 1F !ti (rr � I' �s r y , { , (; L