The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989/10/11 - Agenda Packet ----------------- t. "Ov e,, da 0 Z' a GLACAMp� CITY 0 A1'Y:l`1 C M V 1977 WEI)NESDAY ' 67e'TOBER I1,.1,989 7:00 p.m. Udkt 1'ARR GOMkUNITr'CENTER 9161 BASE LlNB RANCHO'CUC:AMORGA,:CALFFORNIA L, Pledge Allegiance IL Roll can ;f Catmiss loner,Blakealey _ Cmmisstoner Mc1NTiel CommissionerlChiti'ea Caaaissloner.Tolstoy Cwmissioner Weinberger HL Announeements IV. Approval of Minutes September-27; 1989 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will,be acted on by the. Commtvsion at one time without di�oussioru tf anyone'has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. DESIGN.REIIIEW`FOR TRACT 12462 -'FIRST FAMILY.H/)MES -'Design review of building elevations and detailed site p'.;,,n f r a previously approved Tract Map consisting of 27;9'.ngle family lots on 17 acres of land in the Very Low Residreitial District{i-^a dwelling units per sere)of the.Etiwanda'Specific Plan,located on the south side of Summitt Avenue, east of Etwanda Avenue APN: 225-181-02;'and 03 ' B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT R'°VIEW 89-07 - GILBERT AJA The development of three. ndus'trial buildings totaling 116,150 square feet an 6.06 BgTes of land in the Industri$1 Park District,'Subarea 12 cf the Indust'' $pecifie Plan, located south .of 6th 'Street ,and east of Pittsburgh; - APN; 2�3-263-22. , „��i �� Y C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-49 UNNETT C NSl SOIADATED The development of 40 acres oll Industrial Master Plan consisting of IS lots in the General Industrial District, Subarea 5`'of the Industrial. Specific Plan, Iodated:on the west side`vf Hermosa.Avenue, 'to the north and -south of 7th 5(reet API: 209-211-13,17,30nd,a 31. c,s `rL., Public bearings i ;t Tie,,following stems; rz i+ublic hearings in which concerneii nrividita187 may voice:their,opliaion oi"si a reltated project. Please :i4ait to ;be recognized,by the Chairman%�nd address, the Commission by stating yoo namd'and address-All siWfi opinions shalt be limited to S minutes per individual for ea4c project. tt} D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ADTD TEN,LiiVE PARCEL MAP 11067 - BE:TNETT CONSOYdDATED - A Aut division of 40 .,,acres into 18 parcels within tit: .General Industrial. District Subarea 5 of the Industrial Spenifia"Plan,located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue,to the north acei: south of 7th Street 209-2117-13,17,;30,and,31. ` E. ',ENVIRONMENTAL j�4SESSMENT" AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02C FUTURE ESTATE, INC.. -A,'request to amend the General Plan Land,Use Map rOn: five to Medium `Density Residential(8-14 dwelling units per acra),for 3.556 acres of land located at the southeast corner of. f ArehihpId Avenue and, - Church Street: The' City will also consder• Neighborhood Commercial anjl Low Medium Detisity,Resideiitisl l VL roQHate alternative designations.,, APN: J077-332-26. (Conti hued from September 27,1989) F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 89-04 FUTURE ESTATE' INC. A request. to amend the Development D9st^iets Map from "OP1T (Ofuce/Professional) to "rin-,Medium Density, 8-14 dwelling units 4 per acre) for 3556 acres of land located at the southeast corner ' of Archibald Avenue and Church.,Street,, The City will also consider 11NC11- (Neighborhood Commercial) and "LM11 (Law Medium) as appropriate alternative districts. APN: '1077-332- 26. Continued from September 27,198.9.) G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PAROBI, MAP 12357 SOUTHLAND;DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION6-111. subdivision of 9.37 acres of land ;into 2 parcels in the::,LOW Residential District(2-4 dwelling units per ac.e},located at the southwest.corner of Highland Avenue and Jasper Street'-AFN: 201-212-12:, H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE' PARCEL MAP 12629 - HU - A Lwbdivision o A.0 acre o land :into 3 parcels in-the ��r�3esidentiel Distr£et .(2-4 dwellir waifs per r. „ acre),located 46Ahe north side of Base Line Road,,west:.af Beryl ;• r Street-APN: :202-231,`,-;30. �'' L ENVIRONMENTAL A I3ESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN`. AMENDMENT 89-02A� E.G.M., DEVELOPMENT- A;request to amend the General Plan Land Use-Map; rom Flood Control-2o Medium. Density Residential ($-14 dwelling units per, acre) for approximr tely,,1,78 acres of,land located on the west side of Carnelian'Avgfite east..'bf,*`�e Cucamonga Creek Blood Control; Channel,and south of Vivero Street-APN: 207-022=64. . J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND, DEVELOPMENT 4 DISfiRit T `hMENDMENT $7-121= request to amend the Development Districts Map rom F._bond Control to Medium tensity ltesitlentisl(8-14 dwelling units per. acre) fortapproximately',Y.78 acres of land located on the west. side of Carnelian Avenue, east of the Cu6monga Creek Flood " C jntroi Channel-and south of i!ivor Street-APN: 207=022-64. K i3I3VJRONME2lTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14T,63 E.G.M..:'DEVE1,02MENT--A residential subdivision and Reign review of, 32 condominium .units on:,3.35 acres"of land in the: Medium Residential District(8-14 dwelling units per acre)and,, the 6 Flood Control District (a proposed Medfi m Residential District),; located.on the west side of Carnelian at Vivero Street ;APN: 207e 022;54 and 64. Associated with this.project"is General Plan. €, Amendment 89-02A, Development District Amendment 87 12,and i f Tree Removal Permit 89-58: I ! in New Business �\,�! L. MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW'89-22-GEIVETT-An appeal of the City Planner's decision ta:deny a request for a_ carport addition tc an existing automot t;7 repair shop. at 8$17 North ' Grove Avenue-APN: 207-220-05 : i4, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-20 - GRACE `'RESTAURANT CdMi;N;Y-j'he design review o building elevatiogs and detailed site plsn for a 6�100 square foot restaurant within e� existing commercial shopping center in Terra Vista Planned Cnmmunity,, located on the northeast corner:of Haven Avenue aiid, a Life Road-AP 1076-481-31. N. ENVIR014MENTAL ASSESSMENT.AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83-14 - .AMPAC - The, development'o 'two mane acturL g ` bu;ldings totaling 26,00,0`square feet on 30.3 acres of land.in the Heavy Industrial"District, Subarea 15 of the°bdustrial :epecifie Plan,located at1216 r Arrow Route—.APN: 229:12L-15., W'M Commission Business t`+ '0. DISCUSSION OF TEX'd'[JIiES COLORS AND MATERIALS'WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC'PLAN AREA P. DISCUSSION OP STREET NAMING POLICY „ t r t i , a � kr. Y'his the.,time aru �ic+c� for.t]te, genertlt,{accUIio to o dress the s�ommtsston." Items,�. o ;h` �discussdit her2 are those which do not airewy appear on age a. S4 :Ad�Pumment The'I?IaNtutq Commission has�aoptedAdministrati�¢Regulations thht, E set an;71 P.M. djournment;tirne. If items'go beyi�nd=that tithe,They shattb'e Yteard;on y wtth the consent of the Gommissicn. 'i= Ira fr L �� r fr o > 1, 'J 4 ' - i 5 x C (r {i` 7 VRONNI Mm �r t 1 " Wmow 1 Cct1LL�6f NYPCr i i7lwlww c � [ w f , arnmsdme rem e� g, Cf6llYM �t +41 •ei Y r:r li,y .r Olq .r �~ 144 PAAI�f I a� ° e cucercwoe�ouefTl �8uwrr'ag6rcweL Pd&1 117 rl 4 0041114 HOUR AL AtRPCgr `` f( WY Olt ld. — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT CO DATE: October'11, 1989 TO: chairman and Members of the Planning Co*isslon FROM: grad $ul,ler, City Planner, BY: Tom Grahn, ,Assistant; Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN RcVIEW FOR: TRACT 12452 FIRST FAMILY HOMES:- Design review o out ng a evations and detailedsite plan for a Previously •approved Tract Map consisting of 27 single family lots or 7, acres. .of land in .the Very'Low Residential 'District (1-2 dwelling units per, acre) of the Etiwanda Specific :Plan, located on the south side ,of Summit Avenue, east. of Etiwanda Avenue APN: 225481�02 and 03. I. PROJECT AND SITS DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the grading plan, landscape p anT and bui'laing elevation4y B. ^roJect Density: 1.54 duelling units per acre. C. SurrouMi Land Use and'«Yoonnir North` Vacant; s ng a of miry resfdential;'Estate Residential Disir,ict. (O-L,'dwelling units:per acre) South - Vacant, single fam,y +^eS1dential; Very.Low Residential O'istrict (1-2 dwelling units per wre) East - ' Vacant, 'Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West Single family residential; Very Low Residential ' District (1-2,d=1ling units per :acre). _ D. General Plan Des nations: Project 51te -Very Low7e91d6ntial f North - Very low Resi'dentiai South - Very Low Residential East - Very Low Residential ' West Very ;Low Residential' E. Site Characteristics: The project site, is currently vacant and vegetation consists of native grasses, weeds, ' and !.. Eucalyptus windrows located along the north,,west, and south project boundaries. The property slopes roughly three (3) to five (S) percent from north to-south. I�I fa. :I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRACT 12462 - FIRST FAMILY .HOMES 77 October 11,1:989 + ,. Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Tentative Tract 12462 was approved by the Planning oL�Wission on December 14, 1983, and the final map has been recorded. The applicant is now proposing a'total of three (3) floor plans ranging in size from 2,850 square feet to 3600 i. square feet, and each floor.plan has three''(3) elevations.' B. Oesign Review Committee: The- project was .reviewed by the 5mnittee' Bakes ey, Kroutil) on gust 3, 1989. The applicant was dirrected to revise the project and return to the Committee due to the following concerns: Site Plan 1 . A solid wall should be provided along the rear of Lots it 2.. Hammer head driveways should be provided on Lots 13, '14, and 15. 3, The drive approach for Lots 3 and 16 shoulrl,be 50 feet behind the BCR. 4. Front yard landscaping should be .provided and should include fair (4)' 15-gallon size trees on interior lots and 'eight'(8) 15-gallon�ize trees on, corner. lots, seeded groundcover, and '`a permanent irrigation system, This requirement shall be in ` addition to required street trees. Architecture 1. Modifications to the elevations of Floor Plan '2850C ._ and_32_n0C- heuld-;include either: a) mood siding on the elevations rather` than stucco; or, b) Retain the proposed stucco and introduce 'I additional elements, i.e.,; wood 'trim, brick, stone,, etc. The applicant revised' the project and, returned to the Committee, (Blakestey, Kroutil) on September %, 1989. The applicant was again directed to revise the;project and return to the Committee due to the following .tencerns: E PLANNING COOMISSION STAFF 'REPORT TRACT 12g62-= FIRST FAMILY'H01485 October 11, :1089 Page 3 1- The massing of the entryway on elevation 2950C should he•s'imilar ta.elevation 2.830A.. 2. A brick element should be provided on both sides of the 28W entryway. 3. The ,front elevation of elevation 3200C should be more- symmetrical. This can be accomplished by shifting the window, at the corner of` the garage elevation to the center of the wall. 4. Extend the brick element around the side- of elevation 3200C. ,' On September 21 1989 the Committee B1.ikesle McNie_1,_ Krouti rev ewe the pro ect a recomm nTe3 appr— oval— C. Tree Removal Permitt Staff approved Tree Removal Permit 89-05,; or entat ve Tract 12462-,` on February' 17, 1989. The permir. allowed for the removal of. the Eucalyptus windrow bisecting the center of the project site and for the selective 'removal of trees in the Eucalyptus i indroii along the south side,.of Summit Avenue. where the trees conflicted with s'-beet 'and driveway� locations. A copy of tine approval letter has been included Asee Exhibit "E"j. III FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and Oeve opment Code. The project will notebe detrimental to the, public health or safety, or cause nuisance or's,ignificant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and the site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, are is compiiance with applicable it i4sions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and City Standards. t IV._ RECOMMENDATION:. -Staff'-recommends that the Planning Commission approve the esign review' tirough the adoption of the attached Resolution and conditions of approval. Res) ly s fitted Br Bu er City nner BB:TGmlg PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRACT IZ452 - FIRST FMMY MES" October 11; 1989 Page 4... Attachments: Exhibit: (A'S - SiCe 0til ,ztion Map Exhibit 118" = Grading Plan Exhibit "C" Landscape Plan- Ex hibjt °p" Buflding,.'E,l.e. tions- _ Exhibit ,iV _ Approval LeCter,ar4d Tree Remova". Permit S945 Resolution'of Approval With Standard Conditions t r -- y n s ❑ 4 IT INom No!Y r� mom t �t .`ter of OT'Y OFRAikitb AMONGA 1T'EAtS: PLANN114GDP IOPI ITa SCALF— z �`'e,. � � _ ,s tl ', yam• ., 4 20 ORO co t CL AV Ol Ilk el am �"'=�'ZL'ts,,..e..+s. :•was.•a.�.� 0- 10 f : o i cu It ttipp lift •_,Oil 1 ! .c k., a w � i car 1, 1�. y� F � ' � ■i .ram: qq� rrrn 3; 9t Yr �µR ��- slrr' soon auaisr ■ua■ � r; �Y#ri rrr.�xsMtt �`, r r77 , r " ,■r r f i9gi� fJJI�i� - ovir 4 y, a J/jjjX'u�• lK jYi� �w�1R f+. e 41rr� R a / WAR rru7n on. -lum '•nt (( J a7t'l •.. �lu 61 i� I a , x r ( Is 40 * I t IIA.1�i rr ;� [milli IIf111A f• rk - ■Atr� R{ee uriet�•�'; �� t � RRETi■I;;tr' �fJtr■ryi iv r�t� A Ali t 7. ij f ,p��' tit C, f tI jj I allviall I VI ys a■p � `==� v J r • i. ■ r `L mac- MONO gm (� tiww rOwl ya- +arr6 ��rlas t a 0 r f Of - n % Ci 3 - E t� lit•`I l i��l.+ 1- Owl, tl ; i M Lu mu �C 4 9 !� t �I�r �� rsrsMa'a >:Y,�rtkyus 5F': Alwt if � q7p A f llallY rll wrp►ae _e at a. r{�• ,11t�[ Lx. w k (( irraeww Y�fi� snMYRlif I txw fiy'• ;.f k t" i 4t. 4. a 7 t s, kY. 11 �ptY.rYD wiww� aawww t '�ar�r xws .,, eerrr; ►ro ,� m' t l S .' f❑�1�11k11I111U '��A IJYRI �•� .. � turn{in��r�ui� � _� It-_ f/Iy T fY`It4 Yt 'a Y n iri wr �:,��illi�i tr�r�mtrf�tiL�fst#l�' �'��u�netwf( L a 1 r, 7 i t .fir: ,ww�rYw ■.�i b■ ara� �=.. "s x: k� �aanx 6ttwaA t it ! py r r at■ r ■>rwa �.� as a tftj ra � rwgi 1{ ■p(/e� tl j -. �Ia f} M. + aMMrrr�=r==-- NOR Y ara lea r,o, ao Vac:e - =II aar�aq } aaritp ® t rR� s ��■. ., re ■Flraatl 1 `' yK` 'arwsr :4C iI t ill... �. Ili ..•r� Rr' D . , 1 - ., ,. , F: �.�; '+,ti r i+(*•. r ;��'�1 �4--,: �.;� i :_ t1 µc"i [r Y:1�� A L* j j .t.a`* pr I h b �)� 4 t� y �rw M. /] rri � r .+u.. � / M-! �R 'Y�7.: Y yEH'. �4 1 •MrMW k.srj{t :.`�r •Msr■ �, l..M Rrlii� - .tyro + May f r � .a rra[.:. i ��.■ T.. -� Yyrq� rr..r s �, � r1 ■■ 1MMa t? I 1 {� YRrr rr: � j •.t ar rls!rYi/ l . r „i t rrrsW■ ;X1R!� Y .YArr �. �1. -F,. 1.)R.r 111 .ar.r y,$ y� �' j M '1�R z� i 1 � �_ ;.. �=Aj�f "In r tY Yr Y m � 1�I�,�f.rl�a, Ifi e■� !!fir.. ■ .6," —[�zhh> 7 runs r ■■rat o. iwwi ; s � .u■ kwww i�x. 'F �r aAr., (inn- � rnnr i"j. t wrwlit orwr ■ if. V�� ■ f•"i1��1� few?, .. `FYlrrwByr r r*,,. a4 17 i�Y.STr'it Zif Na i� _�1� f��Rt. f 3 ' s a i a a �&tK1■Ca�L-, ��t I��IIIYti/��` .:%_... ,T+Yz." 1 0-11 Bill /,T4� p •1��1 �'� 'rs�ii3r 'n°0� nr■ :+!•t ��I� a wr■ j� rig ( .., ��,- ��uKr■ ,' orr ��C ' 1 ■■■ _a fff � � rM� •IlIQ9i�iu -�� a 3 E l.: r• t 1 rrrr �"3 • tzii 11� nn_ t � t r rL J e�■ N y` rrY i ^s �.tj•®,t�� f�. � — Cie.+,, ��ua��r1�. � a■■ria ra�e■r srl��■� ■r6e■M ra■ira r` ■rule.. M� �,: — =p■i�==urn AX09. _ } �rlaar '� OetR Ilp! rM ■■■ rre■�iir r si: euY,• � t M a�� +' +- _, ,.„ , .-. ,. -.,.: 'i ,. .. _ b. __ ...- '� ?' ��`. s� a ': ��• M�j: .`"� re'*. ��7�; V 4 ti �7f Y� 7 dt t' { ,4' iP �,��, Y ,. r Ir...1 ..y.. y� i f } 3�_ rzYNI. i�y �� , a P I �F � ;� �'' t` � �� x; :. n��. 3 - .. ,:�� K ti�' �Y.rr - 'r', I s �f �• [ ( '�� l 'Yrr■ .%. J w rf• s i+n .k e: •.. ` �: M. �4 a, _ ��k.p }+ f - � �, 'w4 7; bJ Ijk Y. .�W�{yy.�} E� Itl'�'�77�t�t#j�hjpplil/MI�[ 1 • � xY'1 ��'.,�i �y��'�1I�tM~gym~#T y.,.rid;,;It�,� w '►_fit - �� r� Yb �(` j A�r A j �� ' <: Tyr 1` y�``l �i �� Oil .i I �, C. u CITv OF RANCHO Mr—AMONG �Pascslr�ce ea:am.Rancho eucunun�a,ea�Camu s��a.:t�ta)4 1 -1 8s Pei 17, 1989 , Gerald B. Laird Laird Construction: Company, Inc 946C Lucas'Rancho`Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-5797 ' SUBJECT: TREE,REMOVAL PERAIT 89-05/TENTATIVE.TRACT 12462 tear Mr. Laird: Staff has reviewed your request for the proposed " removal of '44 eucalyptus trees and one pepper tf-eeL frain the three eudalyptus windrows located around the south,;west,;:and north perimeter of�Tract 1246?0 Based upon a careful review of the proposed'tree rerribval and a site inspection, staff hs determined that the retMest 'ts in keeping with the intent of Ordinance No.. 276 and the intent of the Etiwan&i Specific 101ay in -that only those trees •which are obviously in p0r, health or, in direct conflict with proposed ;street and`'equestrian,,tra31 haprovements are being removed. This approval is subJect to the foil-owing conditionst , 1. Eucalyptus, macul ata "Spotted Gum",. rep!acemeh't'trees,: whi ch. ar'� 15-gallon 'in size, shall bt» adddd eight (8) feet on center. Replacement planting shall "indicated on a landscape and: irrigation plan which shall be ,attached as:,:in addendum `to the% approved landscape and-+frrigation�plans, prior to issuance or building.permM;.' 2. 1he existing .11"es which are tt he preserved shall ". protected with chain 'link.or others materiav acceptr:bie;to the City" Planner, consistent with Section 19.084100 of the City`s Tree r sservatiori' Ordinance and shall be noted on the final;`grading";pians� In addition, protection measures shall be in place .and verified by the Planning Division ;prior to.com;riencement of removal,Of. the trees. _ .4 3. The existing pepper tree located at the southwest,portion of,tine -- sit_ (Alta SurveY No. 3 ) shall be preserved. 1'he exact trunk location of the tree, shall be piotted,on the,.grading plan and a cross section prevlded., to illustrate',brancN and trunk location; The tree shall be, pruned tc allow.,,a minimurs twelve foot high ' clearante'for the trail w `. CeYYGIetfNtQTI ' _5. .Neyor WiBlarn).Alexander Charias j Buquet 11 Ctiq As=ar Dennis r.Stout' Mborah N.Brown Ptmeia 1.Wright Laurel NL Wassernun ;. .;r 5� � btKALJ U. LAIRD TRP 89-09/7 124V February 17, 1985 :. Page 2 1 . 4. All existing eucalyptus which are to remain shall be selectively pruned rather than topped.. All following manner: pruning shall be done in the a) Leaves debris, dead branches and suckers accumulated eSong the base of the windrow shall be removed periodically as tray be necessary for reasons of public health and safety. i b) Dead or decaying branches shall be removed; ttvnks stripped,' and tree structure tritmled at least every four ,years or as may be necess, ry for reasons of public hearth and safety as well as aesthetics. c) Trees should'be trinned to' preserve=their natural structure. i 4)' Remove unsightly but poorly crotched limbs ,and heavy leaning branches. e) All cuts are to made, flush, and/or in„line with property arbicultural practices. Attached for Your information is a guideline for proF;e�a pruning trees which;has been provided by a Iota! arborist.1' S. A11 construction and grading shall preserve and protect those trees slated for preservation .in accordance with the standards setforth in Minieipai Code Section 19 C8,110. This permit shall be valid for a perfod of 90 days unless an extension is requested 141days prior to the expiration of the permit. Tne decision shall be final unless appealed .within ten calendar days.' Appeals must be filed.in trriting to ,the Planning Comission Secretary together with Me S62.00-appeal fee. if you should have any: further questions please do not hesitate to contact Cindy Morris at (714) 9t9-1861. Sincerely, OHM D DEPARTRUT ,P N"A' Id I Col eMa Senior Planner s DC:CB:vc Attachment " cc: Mike'Winn a0 M RESOLUTION NO. ARM A"RESOLUTION QF THE PLANNINGtCOMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVIN�,QESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE cMkl` NO. 12464 TF E DEVELOPMENT OF 27 SINGLE' FAMILY :HOMES ON 17 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED, ONL THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUMMIT AVENUE, EAST OF ETIWANDAf)AVENUE IN TBE , VERY LOW.: RESIDENTIAL' DISTRICT (14 DWELLING ,U,NITS PER ACRE) OF;THE ETZWXNDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING' 1NDINGS IN SUPPO',�T HERr r,,,. .APN: 225-181-02 ANDIF 'd3. A. Recitals. (i) First"Family Homes has filed. an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 12462 as described >in the title' of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject 'Design Review ;request is, ;referred to as "the application". (ii) On October 11, 1989, the Planning Commission)of the.City of Rancho Cucamonga field,— meeting to consider the application. . Jiii) Ali ieg�ai prerequisites to .the adoption' of this Resolution have occurred. ,y B. Resblutigir. AAM NOW, THEREFORE, it is .hereby found, determined and resolved by,the , Planning Commission 'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.as fellows: 1.• This Commission hereby specifically :finds that all of 'the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to, 'this. Commission during the above-referenced meeting on October 11;. 19.89, includ'I' wrii;ten and, oral staff reports, this Cot�ission hereby=spectfically"finds:as"follo►vss : a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan: and. h. That the proposed design, is- in ac0ord ,n'th the objective of the Development Code and'-the ;purposes " of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the propo, d design is in compliance with each 'of the applicable provisions of .the development Coe; and di Tnat 1,the proposed design, ..together With the ,?conditions applicable` thereto, will not= be Aetrimentai to the public health, safety, or =; `rI,lfare, or. materially injurious to properties or, ikrovements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION .RESOLUTION NO'. 4 i TT 12462 - FIRST FPMIL ,\HOMES O;.tober'11,,1489 Page 2 Ttl 3 8ased upo:; the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph51 1 and 2 above, this. Cdii iission hereby approves the appl,!, aAion subject to each and every condition set,,forth.below and in the dttac,4d Standard Conditions -` attached hereto �ftd incorporated--heteln:by this ;�fp%ence: Planning Division v (i) All conditions of approval for Tentative Tract'12462 as contained io the- Planning Commission Resolution 83-140, shall ,appl�l. (2) Front Yord' landscaping is. ,requI red, and shall include, �t a minimum, f,Wr (4) 15-gallon size trees on interior'lots and.eight (8) I5-gallon size trees on corner lots,. seeded groundcover, and. 'a permanent 'irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior.,to occurancy. This requirement shall be in addition to rl,quired street/trees. (3) Lots 1, 11, 16, and s' shall.be provided with 'solid corner side liird and return walls, (4); The solid wal;i provided along' the rear of Lot 1 shall extend. i'om the,-''otmiunity Trail to the.gate j' leading to the �tocal eg4�astrian trail. (5). A solid wall shall be provided along the rear of Lots 11 and 16. (6) The design,of the-solid wall shall include natural stone pilasters; stucco fin.ish,, and a decorative cap subiect ta.G ty Plznner review ae approyail prior..to. _. . . -.. the issuance of buildinc permits.' (7) The P.V.C. Community Trail' fencing shalt be provided along the front property lines of Lot:, 13, 14- and 15. (8)" The stone 00-:ant used in the build"q elevations shall be a natural ,tcne and not a. manufactured stone; veneer. Engineering Division (1) Lots fronting onto Summit Avenue shall have hamP-r -a head :driveways. Landscaping, walls,: and trail fencing °:Within the Limited Use Areas for those driveways .shail .be approved by' the, -,City .Traffic ' Engineer. jr I ., canMsszota AtitilNO I pA�ttLY xpmss 12�2 —FIR1989 qc 'ber •9 uthin all intersection obstructn the City Traffic f,I 2) Gandscaplh °htdshall,be eppraued by line of s d as far Engineer> 1 be 1cate ro ah on sha� osstble. (33 'Ch4.drive �R� t�€an R as p _:. the adoptdon from the interred tC , com is�s on shalt cent y 14ie Secretary tof. Oc �?ER '1.989• �r�r of this ReSolutlon� rn S 11 H DAYYT 0 s: APPROVED C�lGP PS;ANNING cowls Stt3fd OF' B:CITY O Rpt�cK4 0t10A BY; hie , ha rman arrY p tESf uT1erA ecretarY R04-to racC Commission of the City otltc and Plana of the SecretarYi� the P foreegnn! esalutfssidn cer y that ;the by the Planning, :ymnissio held. I, Brad Bul e hereby W'd` ado1 f the planning Cucamon9a� isstroducedx Rased. Oar Mee � Vote-to»�it,. regularly cucamonga: at,� by following city of Rancho of,October, i989 on the 1 th day AYES: COtK�LSST{SNE�tS; E � C4t�+N��SSiWKS. ABSENT* C01' '�SSICSY�S= „d cs HIS, K� 4� �v as�r Ktwaxa a 4agW N Ha d' A ig'Os ar. q v enxE'> A3 Qo4pN=`.,w 3V�p OlidQ ZtjW xc«® `�4 V�y N.y��°A. Q��ca qW� Ci µN Y. J� N�G ZfwG.N�O., •'_.. ��ry,/tYNK 9A NeG° tNN C� � CC r uQ*sa .ap... >• yN �15«N ^OZN'•'•GY >vd.'�"^d � 39 '.� L C aL��dY �'=y4"a' anM cgw:nf �' . S�i•.'aua w�akf' '� Slat Ww N�ae°rf =aj a^g$yWduw WpGa.gua.tEy- K«y$ma.�ac.:i.�'.' °a , -.3 IS Shaa c'aLaca vaaosY Ada:. d pp qq , rWe u • � � M�n sF w04: +}y�.O a �MM�a�yN ParM+ h� pany 1+ ai�C5 wt +' 1 VA Its O .r`M a a Y!F y P� ET3iYs a R�mje "Z2X s , N 11 1 1 Y e�+�^�$ 6Q� 7 $ N R gnWj wYam._ -5. Z } $K.� M 9.V^ ys M-: Y YYQ- 'Q NN'�.:. '^ R.Q 'c..o$ c. "ua HE a'ce y�,� 'a a'y'°' per; has q 3y -�jYN AER 7'a o'° c+� �'$i: -3 V..r34,�.,' fit`^.. W C1Yiq ¢ C S S .:fI`L� ... �a'�,� y'tL. Rr ar y N Y� 11 BBw� G N.Y N=2 " Y yL L ai q pL N 0 N y 4 W"t+r \ .V cs C t`w�. i f L T a I w�L�Ygt V_ uQ� wT4Viy M 4,1 AYg ^'Zy {.IVN V�=V UKq�yy.� :. aG �Qtl'Ygq R 1V tl OWN LOY�N Q'V QIiY.L'^ tly`•�NCO CY L VW'p -:Ngtl CYu �V4Sr`�wR�. hRtl VC�w. Ir- L Y tl N nt �RCiGQ■y t4LYCL AuC V•�Ty^9..: OiO. MWN Qa YI".iC 'C��Yij�V.,8a6,^0 �Ol�4yCNY�� iVw Sk .1A1 /0 * « , Q V.-im ua. §'Fr-5'r� ai .yc$ogp• �ipe'M voq /}� Q NYQ4 QQ�C yq�>M yf...iN L1-LM wNQ 1s '�Sf U"-'w m is-V Y? _ t Z' O4RUMw Y 4L 1 q ' �.0 CY M R CM 01 ` Cp9y VY p Y dopy y4'.� G jwu^g V .� ?'N C �+V G� Y EMI. X.� g.^ YY Vyf M�� N 9P L�N � N}a 'yDh♦ �� s SmY. cw�'ud� $Mn Z--'-b�3 ZN ''_'S�q�y� �Iargf ~}yY .wgpLA�p •q`aaC� �. z-::N M,arl..YiL.ni 4 4Y RMA- �M1 4. r1 N C�OY to PVCM•N• �� C o v�aiYR..p �q a.ir �yyr,nc4.ti ~ayyLr��q V.rYi A. Cw � 111 � O wyR9 �p9G '�aG $r 4p h 0q, .. a tl1 � $�R =a OO SJ ptltla y y R• V Ow e� ENZ C µ3.5 (Li.� � �Y {!�Y qr 4u � �CY Ry A, J$w " .fix~ ra�� M B.ty $yiQs aa:j $ v may€ W �" ;,.gyp e111 � G+3 g Y a lIROQ 4 q ,pcy q'ay'4 ~Ili v�h�■ quo � CCCCq, a 0: .55$. Nw wi4gild 0.QA V. 66 ,�yy C 4t @A Y�.• ■ Yt C � �, pay,gF��CN Sa 4 y� t.K1� :� C M �� W M 4 � Y' V 'a O. E9 1w l V t3.6�M F } k 000 ' $ rfio <�.a. YMf aNi i- i V :u' 4 �4 Sal ZEE N noeo a LLuc�Na.w3 'tU$e yNZ 11 L6�M N p1Y aq q;oO�Y ~G ps 4 '.Y RYr q G C cYLMC Cp L �OO N`N`Ei.. r�TY O:C •rJ .ii S1 4Y �D q •yyi Y:NNONNOUy Vs oii'YV ^' V� O�aN �py �pC• C. yC �M' >.L w`Or C V ledC1! Y{��T :: 9YN Yd w//G�,p KNr'Mrr pl. vO�aN M.G. ea �.� YEN.. Y� :'ItI��NY'C�N Y«.Y. Y~Y NCw� C� •'F", R O L C 3 y U m t +"4 R yNew yNNO ry Q CO C4Y04 bpM R-1 RNC RL �tl YW�C„.4��F � �CpC Z `�M ti+q G -G 0.pNO�N-+�l." ^'yyt 0'p Y,!y n Ly�Q ��tp�z{�� ! ' �r 2 t •; ` 4"' .. CpC�i NOCL- �~ �O �G yN��~N iGV�;�yY�Yyy wplCpG ^' w i `t� yO{ L•. ! `QY O N �d N /`;'G Y R�►N L q�y� T O�'I.ypQ K G.NV O �1'1� Yp if Y N0. Li*r1 -P ,OG I A yO N (.Y�y L.p YY dzq.(y6y Cp CWK p ES MC w.w"ii oLp' `.`.� p��pJGbN^CMw �� `l pYf 4 VowYaY+4> �NL64,LC•',YGL 4YI 61 CCU �R emu.' C c. 4? y C y T f.� • . �� S`•Y � ,^ aK �N 111 3''c 6`m HL'. Cp MN V�O��CV �Yy�^' p� qp • f f Y VYTy �Ntyi C ccC a+Y �(MMyy3a NO Y MY9. G �'W M 1`LCY CM BN.a iIQ M N� M�M r�.�C1q.��Lw�TJ iY4 �`O� LL G N q�1 ♦yy K �Cn O .•.NRN CNr. KN 9Nd '�Nr �N Vr�Qt•>V1yNL0 qr p. �V yi. V4 i I.p u ac 'O c Q.1 yIL r` rny.~Sc ci aA 4 n►yama..y r .x'a 1NEm�6 N.Q.q� _ �y N Y f'l • Y:CMi y 0. 4 Yw 4�Y V 'p�.3 g¢amQ Y Y N Om rJY�L3 �'� n' rgy,a+a� P yYCL `6rta�9 '� �2 Cya qa '" ,fir{' '$ $33q n°'•y tl�'•• °ri-''" a6G 1 4rry B aY yu 'tl� c6� ra• Ci > y:eN•�G ss C w�0�^ s®� :�i M-3 � �M• Y.Y�A 3�. a� � >Il.�w¢� w ^4 NY H pwRq Nyy� '.'+yp�{�t p�C�C Oi �G0 falw -PIS IS§9 ZbA » ^'� VN r VM 'p4NV {• �' 3Sy.. eg a; ve Sg A� q RR p� �qt �_�4� � � ^� NY y �M w.y,-�. w MO luwP'YC •f MSO 6� N tl yy 1 N tJ LL g M Y :Hgam Y I« a > y:° $ ` .$ w 3 tl„a,..t`m 1.yC. M14� ^ '. '• wi:.. H Ra iRi. Cw C= 0 K:i� gs3.' K.iiN• Kw4� N w z e�� da 95w w`A_Y _'BEY V& ij y! LAJ '_N r'V O�C 'L� 'O�.y Y. } •�Y7 �0 � C �~ Q Vt gc pq� e�d¢.�r ::jS�' o'aSa� -aau dez. L 7'L=w `C. Oa ::a C L O•�N psS• �yy'>>YC ro� 'O v..y.N �001 Y Y■c■'�MYa .CY ^ VIw CNO. ii*=,q..AL ��.. � 0 ~rW ��o> 'ju. va3aa w`vr -4 'w o, — w Cv WL L C 'oVyC�yyV .y y �n p �.. Ma > 'Cap 4�YO� y:.gO.V-� o �C. O 4 : Y�N C•s� »tj�L �yY L f� i. d ^M'l�V 4. '� _ a', ?Yu %.Qi.. �$.y.��' �� C• o Us (L� •rY48 uw Zzmz �C9a� ^• .p Y,. L ti Sii 4- Na c ASd LMC M rYilS S? jC w Lr.•+T $ G K yp �. 6<� Y.�4 a■� rx. WW y C �M Nyy� .OVOOC�O OX C p Cl M G= M 4OO w y H uAu y�y1,�! pY� A m [4 'C �p •M we H�C.N y (♦�4 ifU C y.®ML� LY4 J 6�4d� M.r aC�µlr Ms CAa q p ��yE'q ••�. d�OM 6gMY Y` L4 O! L CC :AeY �V .FC 6•r iIW�LiOA !• wM.�i�4t0,• �GG4L `� • i ". dj aar• ��..GQ l4i vl �. 4�.0 N M^..D.-y� �_-N �3t y u pp _ t eyV tyy�� 9 �M 9 Cx6rY G 1 w..' Y a L C91, y ' V V Q j y, . C v CO Ci �{_�! ■S y C'S 61 �C impp.pp� Yyp YtlN Y,�r ��:'.V"� _!N. S'� +.. 6C. d«^ y pyC L yup Y6>t y.. p^.a� yCY yppA w + y�!L .•^O� 1M• �6•<.bw «.w1 wC:f. +VY' ��. au.^. ^«•.p,C� Y CY'{9 T-ZL w aL> m .8a., yy 4> Uis My Q «T..~y N® ttpii L C01 L$F. � Q& If q�` iy L �r'�' �`•Mv T dei QS �� pM p� i!y ��1��p �}LY 6$ qiA t y.G w' i1N L . M i 34.0 .L gw t N�tld�C �•, $ y ..bb C��' ~ 9~ �d �ti't~�Y •�L;� I4/ N. Ati N ^ N� i s a _ p � Y� a yy�O�Oy s ~ y p��al T Ifs MY L N spJpaa pL 1p 4!^«ai Y+ L N Y•1.�4� K'. .: e w Wµ. e 44i1 l�NA V M C �.w. A'f f ` � 9L �NY•'�� ~yam a •4� G � v�V�S Y�y p Y�..ry Y n ` d t4 4 Y G �4Cy qy� C. C Gtl uw. {� ` w�y0. ., NrC G 98 N. `M S�r 0 4 4I q Y � �cs�wr. YyY•` CG � .w.•ti'� w —� y� o Y r yN Y. Q li� YV V�LT 61+L ar O L � O VO�.p as II C C Y1paG I• ^ a ■4 y iVr.0 y` pC �OpN y +— YNV q � YN=V_+ U L'Y� ; O 8r 9w O: ^ cr14 •� NL' '" Q a. YAW C - �N(Lb5^ NY T�f.IN y 4Y N L� Y. Mp Yp. fp.: Q� �:. iyN� Yroy�•yCp •� 0 7.�0"1Y {d{yy VL +p.•�� 4 Nf gE,..NY 4V• �M r M �� y� ^' uN fCI Y� +.y LB` $$ V y erg. a!a{t L yyp+ 1V {L�IiY i0 40 •p � y. ]• � �O�W Q4 �N tqT V 2ti �M�L� Lw •L.. i O r C1] OC C LYCO �! CYY LG Q T�" MyL!• LpM �N CQ M,•��pp Lp.G 4l • QA V �1M VM�V441�H C.5 Vr �LV '.Q1' Y Y Pr V b C:LwI LC.Az 6 YM w•� V R CC cc Y +�ysL ` b V 1 6 T V gg'' LUC � N Yt JJ6�� SML yRG�I O�lA�q yST VVwV4T a L OgB1 C g �VL -. T=„ Y n Y a rrV.ggff •]Cps'i{ .A qN V+•i L.y YYY�v^ YY y�p : N _tT 3f .� �V� 4T.MOgG uAC•y�� .. pVV N+ ^�p: Ai =�p� �p, � C®s�{ a$� ytttq�YOYA !tl Y�+` MV N p $0M -S V Vv~ &UZI ■� w�0 Y1 bi�A �`� IY po.m q�' Aida. 6 r �" .2 y •. j 4a GE q 4.M �1 y pp ® u rp c• •n V V` ^�p RW'x— $ IFR w9 N T say MN N� YQ91 i qA gM$.r "g ' YoO �I �•s.+� i_�rC a q _ p� r:L Q i• q + $s :r re—S is. h* .��' s�.�r v. s . *N*6 L`� .`Cq.`{a'i .gies gCai3UZI qp `y qe a vc�.. a 1y��'. W4v' �i 'V9f►1. 4� A. iAil �W� ¢.. i y .p Y ot22o .Y. u u u. T..—.�.�.__,�...�.f s� N �j T q u 31 M Y4Y �W `C`., 4 � O��.:C 9 � '^ O.. •• �.yd `LO YHu ry Wit" CC LL pp 6eep yi1 C'YgqN Y= 13, tyd� '=E uj L 6yy N CC YY �..9 QQ �Se •`� CE�gr�S � E` � <� � �Nd ��'.�1V N�.. Qg4� � �". ud Ja.`+ � OM ii ��.� i Mom.�GQ �.� ••+n+ 1'Zoo C (� `.' up.P....� Y 4 K y M G .jtj Y V y C M1N 0.�d 6yd M C `G EOMp vi $j 0.�.. d �al�a� �Q 'CY v Q:LY i t qqG••� u 'S N.._. yY�(Yda� L: ^ Y�� d- f 0�� .�� .. ttgd Ej CLUCL .... Y .■OY6 y7y�tCV HE sO^y� yVw NQ.,y^IMY�.� �C ,'I+s $� •Qdi Vw {C� �aa �N �w. wYyt� ♦rN `N° '.`,� ;•...: �+i uQ'PS aaw�tvdN �•aY•' `o`uLa .N. 1 .. aw��/�.�+ �tYppi �Ka 'LL��: y npp.�11P�.. +, i� •� N Ow.wli N.4 6►Y .CGi 6� WY N 1!ECi X6 _4C1V 4Cv y�0 C �N YW':g`2 •� 47 A sw ti li 14 1; H w 0 I � CN y _<V dYGY 911 r ov O �M aT Et s Q a $ B. TI ^w = s Vo � { $g 41- ". 4 u -m W q 4 .-.ir a 'r pa CQ a. c � w :a y+Yp r.o •.� tix C8 d: -5Is w ^t QrG D• Mw 6 . C p � qN 2a y�a' ,i1�w a tl L FF ' �qp ' q Ma � m �O K916 Ocw C�L a vx 4�. p eel Y u... e E a�JM I C B.2v A Ag wSYL8L8Q 1= ss z 1, kG.Z wr N N pp 9�y co �N o-I1! S x_o t c u cL o N a'n g� a d S A� OY.VyV yc L E $co$ e f I I r o"N VOy 4 d{� ju Eva Up Oo •V MUy e ,,�yyy` Y J' L yL CCO s{ `p`` O{w�b9 C ` CO ®m• qC a��y . n Mom. N • ag6L� K.•. y. l �4 Cd 1- 1 O V... I_ to ' C p! � 'ly.� Y■,Y 9 ffi � i{� gy® 4$4d� �yp nQ �Ytl�. 64�YCAL �1MMa3� Olitl MiYO Fitt a^ SEE s V ee N !N � !�9� Eligi+ O 7 YYLa Nq.y a 0 �1�3� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C77777 STAFF REPORT';. r� GATE: I October, il, 1989 TO: Chairman ap Members of,the Planning ,Commission FROM:`,-,-- -" Brad Bul-ler,-C-�#ty-P annex' BY: Steve Hayes, Assistant- Planner _:, SUBJECT:, FNVIRONMENTAL I ASSESSMENT FOR. DEVELOPMEN REVIF;'' 89-07 - GI B IT A - e t %ve opment of three':' •ndustria bul rinl gs totaling 11 .;150 square feet on is acres of land-in the Industrial Park District, 'Subarea 12 of -the Industrial Specific IP1'an Iodated south of 6th'Street and east of Pitts burgh :A venue RPM:, 229-263-22 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIQM. A. ' Action Requested': Issuance of,a Negative Declaration. B. Surf ourdinq Land Use 'and Zoni!M AM North, -�Vacagt�Industrial Area,,Specific Plan Subarea 11 (SenF1 Industrial); South - Vacanw 'industrial" Area Spec ific'p la,n Subarea 12' (Indus S (a1 ,hrk) East - Vacant; industrial Area Specific Plan Subaru 12 (Industriai--Perk) t - Vacant; Industr"; Specific Ptah Subarea 12, (Industrial Park) Y Pradect Site - :industrial Park. North - General Industrial South Industrial Park East - "Industrial Park Test - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The: site is presently vacant with no s gn scant native"vegetation or structures.. I imm B 91 rPLAUrfla.CQMMIS,51ON 5 tAFF RCPRRl ; Y " DR 84-01-, p3A October 11, 1989, Page 2. E. Parkin s Calculations. Y ' Number of Number of Type Square Parkin4 Spaces Spaces of Use Foota e . Ratio Re u�red Provided Office/Administration 4,.DDI1 1/25D�, 6 16 Manufacturin.. _ 32,DOD 1/5001{ , S4 Warehouse/Di'stribut�ion 80; 64 1 2/Lt1DD: tR..; 164 pup Ca 2D,DDD oo /CV phi- (2D,D'D4�40,DDO; *Calculations far 3'separater4DOD buildings (40 DDD+) TOTALS 148 186 II. ANALYSIS. A. General: ftaisy y 0ew is for environmental clearance only. itie URIlcanti it-requesting approval" for new conatructfon� of three office/warehouse buil'dings ing total 116,15E square feet. Ea , ch,building incorporates an enhanced entry structure with an overhead trellis and enlarged seca-gd-story, ipmi reflective glass'WindoW. Two access points are provided .for the project do allow effir�ient circulation thfpugh the site. Following, issuancetof a Negative Declaration, the City Planner would grant approval subject to conditions recommended by the review committees, B Des n Review Committee: On August 3, 1989, the: Committee tacNiel., Weinberger.,Coleman) reviewed the oroject,`and recowtndeii revlsians. The following #sues Were discussed: 1. ;.Compact "park'ng-stalls- should be distributed Sorg evenly throughout the site, -"= ' The fallowing details should, be shown an the revised building elevations: a. Provide spandrel; glass in areasr,visible fror,,, streets. Also, spandrel glass should Wrap around to the side elevations of thebuilding. „ b, The building entrance should. be altered or angled to avoid a "fixed" design, +` z 7777 PLANNING COMMISSIMI STAFF REPORT DR 89-07 AJA' October M, 1989 ; Page.3 AM Th c. . e building walls need to be art'iculated to help vary the;'buiTdng form, especially, in '. arias visible from streets. 3. Provide trees that will aid in creating a "focal point" for each building, ; . On August 17, 1989, the Cc?mililttee (Chitiea, Tolstoy; -Coi`eman), reviewed--the-'t^evi ed stte plan and elevations on a consent calendar basis. Approval was, not g�',anted and it was recommended tfiat the item ret�jrn for additionalr Committee review. Ther design Review Commi}ttee (Chitiea= Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed re'rised 'Tans, ` at its September 21, 989 meeting and recommended approval subject to the following conditions:; a. A sem�j-reflective glass sha11 be used ,,Op- all second-story windows throughout the ,?,.e---ect.., Pop-out slot., windows shall be added 'to the buildings in 'the following loc4tions� f 1) The southeri-Most panel of the ;vest elevation Wr Building 3. . 2), The western-most panel and one-half of the south elevation of BtMding 5, 3) Additional semi-reflective glass shall be utilized above the entrance on the:.east side?of Building 3. b. A revised material srinple board including a -.sample of-the.-new semi-.r_e_f.1ectiite.,glass_sshal.l e submitted for review and approval 'by 'the Planning Commission. C. Technical Review'Committze: Gn August 1,`1989, the Committee reviewed the project and determined that, with the recommended Standard Conditions of Approval, the{ project is consistent with all app-icable standards and ordinances. The Grading Committee conceptually approved the project at its meeting on July 31, 1989. D. Environmental Assessment: Part. 1 of the Initial Study has been ccmpletcd by the applicant. Staff has completed Part 2 { " PLANNING COMMISSYON'STAFF REPORT DR 8947 - Mk October 14-,1989 Page 4• w. J1'f of the ;Environmental ''Checklist and, found no s.igni;.ficant adverse environmental fip;wts°as a result arrthis project. ' If the Commission concurs. with staff findings., then issuance of a Vegative Declaration-,Wdl d'be in order. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The_ proje:`� is consistent with the General Plar. and the:;Industri.al Area Specific Plan, The project will 'not be detrimental, to the publjc health or s.afety,�nr cause;,ttuisances. _. _ or svziificarit 'adverse env.ironmentah-impacta. In additioh, the proposed .Use and ;,Site Plan togethPfr with: the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compl�ince with,, the applicable �! praiiisions of the'.5 Industrial Area Specific Plan and City Standards. IV. RECDMENDATION. . Staff recommends issual-_ _of; a Negative Declaration for DR 89-07. `l Re c fully. mined, Bra ie City ,onner BB:SH:sp Attachments•: Exhibit "A" - Master Plan `41 Exhibit 11B11 - Site Utilization Exhibit '!;C" - Site Plan Exhibit °D" -.Conceptual landscape Plan . Exhibit_"E' - .Building Elevations Fi ti y_ i ? �iI '� 'I' r • �) is # l�� I t !k N I � o r" u 3 pit � w.r.'� a _:..,S:v— _ s•i•�^? � a-..F. } nr AA ell E MISSION VIS IA 9USI E55 PAR K s CITY OF W.TCHO,"CLiCAMONGA try: D K Ig- PLANN (;-b". IoN TM tt 1 t All i yam; ca off Rom) co Ala 0 TW or F f � ram. 6 •.° � � .p '®ambBF 3, 4 x ' �roedt t� 'awa tmo i1ffs��cm-ln TOTAL W44 VAN (.testa luao,a as. MISSION VISTA BUS1 -ESS PARK 4 .�-41"y OF RAND ajcAtV bN`GA. TEEM: R 89 PLANNING',D$' Ifllti;it 7 E: EXHIBIT: ,T y �f r O IY` 1 W f• tt 1WIN q. w t�. � . a• � :r s 1�ourW iCKltl .__,,4 'j �il tU�ilAG�IM+M tx.�rl. c�rWil Rt a•W ux [�iw �' � .. tqu nwnriioawcr. �m fwMtlNO"cmr 1. y�ypp� ..newtwtuwi 6w 14 • ry'$m min, ve W �Y i v"H CITY Or- RANCHO-CtiCAMONGA IrMK.,—QR 29-0-'7 � DMsjo r <. Tom: f3 ^ ram-t, :,53) 'N' EXHIgi-r."t-1" � .Ct i C 'Ut6 MBSvI/OROROIMSO.- !� is�mvraxar.�+9cxn+'ao+�oaw� ,S lww t NON -CITY OP',I'Ndlb CE-CAMONGA iTEm,._�� c7 Z XIiIBd ':�£-a" SCALE: 6 •"ir�fi rs.�n;t:lliil�iilC`.l:r� Y+�+, a s a��a��,V„"'��r ,�...w........ ..�.w.+.w �... 70$Ilt�riuj raR RwrtE k Uaallit 61�r6 s.+c t�-a�:1�3. H+.�{�titettr�8�� K' .� —r:'ri.. .h'"`-'.�^-'q,--c,.,.... ^„^ Sri r^ ?r •-�w.,. t ��3RriUS�fli► fS»�IsDrtiltf}�>fd'y ��u}rri4'�iM:��lt NI • �i}t Ls — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOING k,, STAFYREPORT , y 0AT= Octrber 2, 1989 TO: ' Chairman and.f,�embers Qf the Planning-Commission - FROM: Brad Buller,,f City Planner BY: Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 81-49 - BENNETT CONSOLIDAiTED - he eve opine( of 40 acres o Zn-cWstria aster Pan consisting of 18 Mots in the General Industrial Oistrict, Subarea 5 of the.Industrial Specific Plan,;located 'on the west`side of Hermosa Avenue,-to the north and south,of 7th Street - APN: 209-211-13, 17,10, and 31. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuancer of a Negative Declaration. i B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Residence and wholesale manufacturing; General Industrial i South - Manufacturing/warehoustng; General Industrial East - Yacant; General 1p*strietl West - -Mai `acturing/war4l4ousing;-'General Industrial C. General Plan Uesiga Qns: Project Site -` 6eheraT Industrial j North - Gcneral 'Industrial South - General Industrial East - ;,General Industrial 'General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The project site is Vacant with no s gn cant vegetation or animal life on gently sloping Ian?) (2-5 p .*cent grade), which drains generally from nor";; ti south. ` } ``1=4 C �r' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT �`- _. RE: EA FAR OR 87-49 - 8"N4,ETt ' October 2 1989 Page 2 E. Parkin2 Calculations: Number of Number of Tyre Square Parking Spaces Spaces of #:ie Footage Ratio Required Provided Office 29,500 1/250 118 Manufacturing MOOD 1/500 3$? Warehouse 394,400 * * 347 TOTALS 847 1155 Calculations for 18' 6uildings ** 1/1000 first: 20,000, 1/2000 for 20,000-40,000, 1/4000 aver 40:007 II. ANALYSIS: R. General:: The proposed master plan consists of 18 industrial building on a0proximately 40- acres of land In the Ganerai Industrial area oi;\,the Industrial Specific Plan. Proposed.ases consist of manufac' ring and warehousing with incidental,o•' ice uses. The proposea,uses are consistent -with the Ind ,trial Specific Plan and wits , surrounding uses. Buildings Cyr the proposed master plan at,* contemporary in desigrt with tilt-up concrete construction Site planning, architecture, signs, and landscaping for each of "the 18 lots will. be ,reviewed individually as a Development Review as each. building proposed. The design of „?ach building and Site would be revae.ed in conjunction with approved design guidelines for the master plan. After ;envfronmental.determyination by the planning Commission and Design Review Committee apprtial, final approval of the project will come through the City P'sapner with special and standard conditions. B. Gradin /Technical Review Committees On September 5. 1;989, the ra,ing andec Mini Review committees recommended approval of the conceptual plans for the proposed master plan. Standard' aird. special condition* were prescribed for the project to mitigate pCantial grading and drainage problems and to provide F flood protection measures,* C. Design- Review CommitUe: On Septe her 7, 1989, the Design Review- —comn+ ttee- hit ea, Tol stby, and Coleman) reeoremended approval of revised Plana of the master plan; however, the x Committee did tiot recommend approval of the design guidelines for, the proposed master plan industrial development. The design guidelines were reviewed again on September 21 1989. At that meeting, the<Design'Review' Committee recommended that< the design guidelines VG revised and re-Sub, itted for review with the following modifications: .;- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: En FOR.OR 87-49 - BENNE1T OctoL2r 20 1989, Pane 3' Architecture: I. Remove stepped accent color,. 2. Remove stepped glazing. 3. Provide punches# windows as an alternative treatment. 4. Remove bright colons, 5. Use square or triangular columns instead of round columns. G, Scale color palette: down by rimoving accent colors blue through green on Pa;e 63,of the guidelines. 7. Modify the accent co-or size plan to remove,th^se colors indicated in Number C. 8. Indicate how the glazing will be used with building accent colors in conjunction with the building accent color master plan. 9. Indicate 4,n sketches how glass will be used-to project abr`,e the darapet., 10. Introduce a:texture .treatment to facades, such as a light srndblast fini„.i so that Uere are a minimum of two differeih textures other, than glass and painted concrete for the building facade--. Signs/Landscape: 1. Iudicate two roves of. vertical ,'ecr*nt trees behind the monument sign on the plan view and`.parspei;tive. sketches. Staff will continue to work with thte applicant and Design Review Committee to resolve these items, III, ENVIROp 4AL ASSESSMEMTa Part I of the I,nitiai .Study has been completed y the aspllcant. Part II, the Environmental Checklist, completed by staff'. found that there could be significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. Construction of the proposed development would displace, disturb, and compact the soil during grading- operatirms. The topography would also be modified to facilitate Anfrastructurp, paving, and building3 pads.. Paving and buildings .`would cover the soil and increase runoff. The introduction of automobiles with, building and paving surfaces would increase Slare,,, However, mitigation " ' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF Rr RED -EA FOR,DR_87»49: October 2, 198g;•,. Page '4 r measures, such as storm,drain facilities and iandsca7�ng, 1nclk)d111 many large trees, ha4eabeen incorporated Tgto.the r'ro$ect design or,. will be conditions of4hpproval by the Cfty Planner t; IV. FACTS FOR .FININGS: Thee proposed use is consistent with the General 'P an ap n ustrial'-Specific Plan. , tie design guidelines and site p(an.,togetfi;w Wtith the .recoMme inG_difications =anc� �1) Conditions o� ,Approval aria in co,*11ance with the�,Indust:rl al. Specific Plant,` The pro,Iect will -not be detrimental to'it<he public i health, safdty weifari,',or'materially ;,i3urious ta.s+�r;our,,d 1 t►g_ ' properties. V. REEOMMENOAk�bN: Staff ri�F .Mends -the<,,,Plarhing Com; ssion issue a Negative Oe;iaration for) evelo�ent Review. =---=-, Respj ly sgbdy �` Brad City er BB:BA:ke Attadhgents: Exhibit '"A" V�cieity :lap Exhibit "B' :- Aerial ,Perspr�tive'oi' Site Exiribi* "C" - Site Utilization Man Exhibit "D"-- Master Plan'Site,.Plar Exhibit "E" j';Truck Route/Turning R40ii`31an Exhibit'"F" ` Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" - Tertative,,P,arcal Map Ne',11057 Exhibit "H"'°- Grading'P1ii �r f J +a FaoU111 Nwlevord b 1 k f Arrwftre E � Ac4cl c 2Sm9 Strert4 { _J�rStY 8ault�t�f I 4tf*L , ut1 i!' )U, Street :y :;.`4 3i " Averoje 7th street im s � C c - � 4!: street 4 � VICIV T If MAP Ae �.I _ Cam' OF. RANG 3€{ � . ~4I '�lA; ITEM:. $?�' k R PC K S C/3� J ° marl O Jt , of Y _ CITY, Q GA 10 , TM7 S t f Sh...hi lyF,l✓:j i T , 1 > `Co. C CP)� Q� ca Uj v3 Lid CITY C RAN AMO GA a PL T G`k SION r�rr[,E 51MR y>11W,;r WM EXMBM c,✓ SCALE: r Y C—7 f � a 3 of 1 t ! L l� S �WI r'^ 73 .16- ± T---� � .` •-•- - 3� Qom,, ma 'r Y / iiII111111 1 O CTy - ` Tnis PLAN„ G.zDi�I� { TT: w IS 11 !11111 3 ~ �t J Y Y Cy s 8.1i 0 Sa; ca s•+ri+•u` as-t_r� s�� ia•.��.s��srss•mom. a •b 0 t I .306 ems... uj CITY OF, f WC AM 'L ' ITCy' ION 'ilTLE: "I ',�l• f! � 4n i' fo 4�T E Y t� ` r i ,la114 it � is �� `K - �� 3Ii tt� "pa�' �p1`�f�iij �• T $8 5_ ,it Pit {}t •s tt t e s i it 4J.s�'S�p} Sip c(°�s � B•�r! J1`� ✓+ Ila-al MIRTH C w L Q ca .gnu tall IMP CrTy OF RAIN GA rrM- ANYON C`.. V `5 Y lit R iG ; kit • � t F �S.S��i q i,9�R-yam 0 i LO o Poi!? � qaa t rti s� as • CY Z rs , I, I �" Q e anwnr rsowu� o ^ IIi cla W=� :1 1i. k?D '� I =: • •• •I III (9) IN ICL W RF Ile Ld 8 I •a'�3e-+--r�."�s.--- j q3 3. 'jfflf 1-- WNall f ir� c- ► :N'A➢0 wA0i1-0A. q•CAf p40i/it p. CITY 0r- Iw, ,14C j:UC4MONGA �i'M . _ PLTIt�tG'"0 aIC�i`T �I1(E?�rV,tTlrf9 F � s� '•o c #! '3� F 3 e• ■ r t ! F ~• � �R � it @'� I( raj `� ,j � - a �al,`• � !F. M CY Sir �� F. ,�} •� ! '�I] ��.. —y a.a 09, jl �!, ul s ':1 C g gYG L .. x 'a •—s � is—�_ — e �� t'S'r ♦y.e, ..ww�� EXFiOM ,/ SCALE; :tea cu CY cu ej zj 10 } r y '� �•Y 4 rl •I � � PLA►-IMN�'D €sION err E r, IN�i f L�fi( EX II�3IT: -?..SCAILE: 'iVe - IA 9 � 1 I co CY , t j � a 1� 0 0 sY 4. W n 1 I E r a i � A � A 1 cIrx of iRA MOrrGA �: PLC `I I ION' 7CME. z as SCALE: MPf EXfYYSI'T: '� d'0 -7`777 CITt OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA 'STAFF REPORT AU DATE: October 11, 198 fi0: Chairman and Members of ilia Planning Comnii•,.on FROM: Barrye R. Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Kral)', Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT; ENVIRQFi!tENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PACEL MAP 11067 - Bennett �r.. onso date su s; on o acres of an n o par.Fe;l;-I �nie Genera�Yndustrial District, subarea 5 of the Industrial Specific P'ian, located on the west side of Hermosa -Avenue# north and South of 7th Street '(APM 209-211-13, 17, 30 and 311 I. PROJECT.AND SITE OESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested:n Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map 'as; s .own on k i'hyf B B. Parcel Size: Parcels range in siie fri 1.03 acres to 4.21 areas, C. Existing Zoning: General Industrial, subarea 5 of the Industrial Specific Plan D. Surrounding!'Land Use: North - Single Family and existing Industrial South - Industrial and vacant., East Vacant West Vacant and`existing industrial E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designation,: North - General Industrial> South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West,- General Industrial` a f y �,'M(d>j� �> x , l PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL, NAP MP -'BENNETT CONSOLIDATED rr OCTOBER 11,_1989 F. Site characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes approximately 7 percent from north tir, south, II. ANALYSIS:_ The purpose of this ,,dreei map is to sub_ivide 4O acres of tend into 18 parcels for industrial use. The parcels being createdr'canform to the Master. planwhiah. is on tonight's agenda as OR 8.7-149 (refer to Exhibit "C"} Public improvemeni�;for this development include the widening of Hbm. Avenuo, the construction of 7th Street, interior local streots. and storm ; drain facilities; III. ENYIRONIde`NfiR:, REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the initial Studycon ucted a field jovestigation and COmpleted Part 11 of the Initial Study, 'No adverse impacts upon the envz'r1iimant are anticipated as a result of thft projaet. tqR-More; issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IY. CORRESPONDENCEi Notices of.Public Nearing have been seni..to sureounding proper y owners anc� placed in tho Dail)�Repor't NOW04,ix`.,_I'Osting at the; Site-has also bee+ z-ompleted« _ Y, RECOMMENDATION: it iS r4commended. that the Plarning Commission consider a apu ana elements of ire Tentative Partel Map 11067. ,lfi,after such consideration, the Commission can. recommend :approval~ then th'%_adoption of the attached Resjuti..prc' and issuance of ` Npgattue Declare� on. would be_ipp"ropr ate. )'i _ Respectfully submitted; All 8arrye i}o.�Kon Senior Civil Eng;veer `vRt�:BR` Sd , Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A i Tentative gap (Exh1'bit 48111 Raster Plan (Exhibit "C") Resolution and Reconded Conditions of Approval I ` ,TH Ul 5rrE } IN GrIlly OF �y*iyp� S{ ��/y,�(w•�{ {sue,,�},�y 7�y�� 1 "CHO CVJC.A •®OA71.,r'A MIGninEdEiMm °:.... ._ l � i ;d AD-- txst ss _ rcta ma. ,e.at .. ta.t'ary6 awY st Nlf. '. Y els a#►a*c►snrr. eR1° ac awUA"91 ■ !=1 a I �, •__..r tit ta»a v sa tt eae t �( yl yR •� C44-fttowp Iwo e l I QQ 1 ( lIIFie KN u"f I I AW f({^astuaaw"Im . .te ulv&m. =s .� ad wat - � f I � i+ ■aYet•YI'II .as A p a:•rsFtt' .o ■m•a—tr3t'^A�' 1ll r aoioaaw►�waa'hwis LZ t1 1 �.'• RFdO s o m us mv. ! bhp. �, '_ti•�,. 1 J a '-a 13maaajaaaata cF•tr � sad ewa r�same. w easeYIIaf Fae�. aue IC.!'fR n� W9 ea.a°oeeam sr�la waFiss/wut:. \ r . FR��F-L, MAP %!O c O LRANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGM°. G D I, \�f.rr YN6!¢Rr�'.Y�T {•4l ff �'^' � 1 i r , - �g1�/"•� iI lot it to 1 u to I � _ .ems: �' .tm��:s4� rr�' �• �� ,,• �,. I� ! L is 7 C s 1 II! /• I It f• I� ,tam CrrY OF prML.PAULL MAP t e RA.NCH0 CUCAMONGA 1TML. MASTER PLAN (01 M'f-4 ElqGDTEMMG DIMON �„ RESOLUTION NO. . .' A RESOLUTION 'OF-',,THE PLAOING COMg4ISSI0N OF,THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONgA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING 1774VATIVE PARCEL .MAP I NUMBER:11067, LOCATED ON THE WEST., SfbE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, NORTH AND SOUiI{ ',,° 7TH STREET AM. ` 209-211 134" 17,:,30 AW_31)., WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 1106.7, submitted by Bennett Properties, appl:icant";rfor the purpose of subdividing. into 1"8 'parcels, the, real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San 8evnardino, State of Calif,rnia, identified as APR(s) 204-211 1. 17, 30 and 31, located on the west, si o Hermosa Avenue, north and south o€ 7th Street, and WHEREAS, an October. 11, 1989, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the: above-described map.. NOW, THEREFORE, 'THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been„made: 1. T,.3t the map is consistent with the General F, V{ J 1 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdiv'isiorz is consistent with. the General i1atii, 3. - That the site is'-. physically so,itablE,,for ,the propa%eot development. 4. That ;hi- proposed subdivision and improvements will not. G'ause<substantial environmental damae or public )iealth problems or, have adverse effects 'on abutting 77 property,.' SECTION>2: This Commission finds and .certifies. that the project has been review an considered in comoliance with the"California Eavironmental Quality fact of 1970 arid, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative. declaration, ' SECTION' 3: That VTentative Parcel Mao, No. 1106 is hereby approved subject La the attached Standard Conditions and,,the following ,Special. , { Conditions: }. I 1 t i t PLANNING COh1MISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11067 BENNETT CONSOLIDATED 4 OCTOBER 11, 1989 _ PAGE 2 1.. The existing overhead ut lin. e;`(electrical and telecommication) an the project side of s Hermosa Avenue`shall be .undergrounded from'the first pole''south of the south project boundary, to the first Ole north of.`the north project boundary, prior to public improvementaccaptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first - =— The developer may request a mimoursement agreement„to recover one-half the City adopted amount for undergrounding`.from the future. development (redevelopment) as it occurs on '• a..opp9site side of the street. r ' 2. The Developer shall ob�ain., a license , agreement ' from the A.T. '& S.F. Railroad and istruct the railroad grade cross;ing within 7th Strcot at 'the V;t project boundary to '<the satisfaction: of;-"the City Engineer, The Developer may request reimbursement agreerrnts to recover one-half' the Cost of the grada 'crossinq� from the properties on the west side of the spur, upon thc it development (redevelopment) ;2 3. A Final Food report hha1l be Submitted and apgroved prior to final, ?arcel Map_ app�7vai. Al I necessary flood W$,ovements _ shall be constructed with the Parcel �fap,irdproveria�its.: 4. Drainage easements and riolits-of-entry, shall be pre,�('fided in favor of the property_0 the earth. 'The easements shA,Ti extend from .each cul-de-suG street and along tha, lwesterly boundary. 5. Storm: drainage facilities shay be , provided as determined vlecessary by the.final drainage study.' The portign of those facilities to be designated as City Master .Plan facilities will be as approved by the City Engineer. 6. - Extend the sto z yet, tc 'hG.-west_s de�-pf:the - railroal spar line to the satisfaction of .�e%City Engineer. 7. Parkway improvements (landscaping zndz.sidewalks) may be deferred �. until development of the adjacent parcels. 8. Easements for joint, use drf .;n4ays shall be pr3vided to the.. parcels north and soUth of the project along Hermosa Avenue. ' 9. Secondary access shall be provided for each parcel; uprn its development as approvedaay the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District., { 10. A permit from Metropolitan outer, District is required for work' f within their right-of-way. - iL ,The southwast earner of the site shall be drained to the east or offsita easement's shall be obtained to drain the area southerly. PLANNING COVOISSION RESOLUTION NO'; t TENTATIVE PA;�CK MAP w6T BEN,.;:'TT CONSO4IOATEO 'JCTOBER 11,,?i9B9 �4 PAGE APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1989. PLANNING COMLIS$ION OF THE' CITY Of RANCHO C7CAMONGA,_ BY: Larry ... cN e -Ch,alr,man >t ATTEST: - Bra Bp 1 ler, ecre.tA y"� I, Brad Buller, Secretary+ of the.P1'&;piing `Comission,i�f the City of Rar ho Cucap7onga;;'�g`�i, hereby,,certify �thai tPm- foregoing Resolution-vas duly and regularly°'Jntpcduced, passed, a O,,.adop'ted try the Planning' Cormrissinn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of tf�erlanning Commission held on the 11th day', October,'1989,. by the followinj vCZ-7to-oit: AYES. •Ct I$SIONER, NOES: COMMtSSIdR,Rsi ABSENT: CO; ISSIONERS. :x i M O^ tt V { y.WGbq fi J[ M >8a �y ti' au et Alf .Lv+ u« i ;sG� a �4' 'g �y R'i 0 .r91 u e pft �3'F.c �� •+:S n+ yKf y L`V �Ny y� L Y � ;y4R' w � Gliq �Mti - 51 ft- Xa u g s{y Lo p:yid q X w 4 6 utl�yyny yye� y�L �' � �� a„� i ':� '��wY �•'& � " ri i.i�"fib _ 8 . O L aM 4. s � rsLis t"+ ; your 1i�+: � � 6 'f�` M Z`. N1•� ;Y � � „�o O 81 O' `�� ..n„'✓�,'ZT �Y O's N 22 Y UU & SY R N + lut . r� M uvi 4a c'L'!i cdL� ww LS�q Nu s� gg of oV' a� o r ,p.•� 'o � as f, o .. ,p 4 �a M J Y d C _ LL 5•' �< go„ ..;off $'� '2.� �=o''. C,w it L�LCr G T V y 4` U yYy cc O. ZS � y� Cam` V 90 Ce` q L.MC y Po COL. C �sY 4 SiJ .Y.CY pMY. L O r iY+�i LL 4�� of uw LL n pY, uwy CYLY y�yO tY,� ry IRV4 S Ch. 6H4 800' KA YJLO 6J'w c N - O U.• N 00 ` �� V M4� - Vag wG-. M` -Mt �� L �.0 p Od•1y ' NV 1yy $ N� L.pSppp_r V O upw4� YuL, 7 L 46y•d` � 'c g N• . n4u Ea uv- o M CV p qM C Q9Cp�pN! K �Cw � V� _d�y� p ^ `cl �Y �TTz 4 p rL VN 4• VBV� tl 4N tla.: 'V !� 3 y � 1 y t C y CS L w WVV N9 vu_ ♦ `op. G yC "C 'C 6J i:'t .�� .Cp Y aO 4 Y pL '�• Q_ yR�Ny! 4 it VyR c M. ,4Jv CE d u aldo •' �S y �� 4v Cp0• O; �lw6 S pGa �Ciw 6.N 4iL �� 4� O G YY. g Cy aY y. 4Bi 44 `Cp` off• r� � ��w �,'�� Lo$ .. � �-a ,o�'� ^a& a a r� a t ey ; osQ'� des= �o��' � �� A,g•� �`� N PI O N I l ca F} rr CITY OF RANCHO'CUCAMONGA STAFFREPORT DATE; October 11, 1989 TO: Chairman-an'd Members of the Planning commission FROM: Brad Bul dr, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner Alan War:, n, A sociate .Planner SUBJElT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 89- O2C - FUTUR ESTATE. ,INC. = 'request to amend thti General Plan Land Use Map from Office to"Medium density residential (8-14 dwellin'9 units:`Pee acre) for 3,556 acres of land rr located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Churcbj Street The City will also corslder�,-,Neighborhood Com a tial and Low Medium density residential a�" alternative designations. APN: 1077-332=�26 � r ENVIRONMENTAL'ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT D.TSTRICT' A14ENDMENT f NO:89-04- - FUTURE ESTATE., INC - =A request to amend the " Development Dis!xlet Map from "OP" (Office/Professional) to "M" (Mediutr, density, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 3.556 acres of land located :at the southeast Zorn"~ of Archibal"d Avenue and Church Street, The City will also consider 'INC" (Neighborhood -Commercial) and 'ILM" (Low Medium) as alternative districts. APN: 1077-332-26. , I, PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. A. Surrounding Land Use and- Zonin§: North - Single family residential; (developed below allowable unit.density), church; Low Density East - Residential condominiums; Medium Density South - Residential apartments,Iacant; Medium Density West Single family =residential, low Density B. General Plan Designations: Project Site ,- Office North - Low Residential (2-4 :dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) nv�i&V c,� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 89-02C, DOA 89-04 - FUTURE ESTATE, INC. October 11, 1989 Page 2 C. site Characteristics. The site is currently vacant and the land slopes to t e --outheast-with a 1 to 2 percent overall grade. Several elevation changes; occur with sloped bank condtitions of 2 to 3 feet high on the site. 'There is no evi&.Ace of erosion or unstable soils. Vegetation consists of native grasses a:rd weeds with no trees..existing on the site. There are no cultural, historic or special scenic aspects to the site. II. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewsd the Initial ,Study, Part 1, and the res onses from the school districts and completed the Environmental responses Part 1I of the Initial Study,'and, except for school impaction, has found that no other significant adverse @nvironmental impacts will occur as a result of the proposed General ,Plan Amendment 89-02C'and Development District Amendment 89-04. Both the Chaffeey High School and: Central School Districts have indicated that there will b3 significant,negative impact on their ability to provide services as a result--of the proposed amendments an,,t planned re,3ider�tial project. The following students can be expected, based on generation rate supplied by the districts, from an anticipated 40•unit project at the site: rate students tudents unit x units generated Chaffey High School Dist. .15 40 6 Central School ,Dist. .75 40 30 Tlil'AL -36 District-wide enrollment figures are shown in Exhibit "D". In response to this, concern, staff had requested that the applicant work with the school districts towards developing ' agreements to provide appropriate mitigation• measures. The I` Chaffey Joir Union High School District has stated a, willingness to work out such an agreement with the applicant. .As o3 ,he writing of this report staff is in contact with the Central School District which is considering what form such an agreement might- take, but the district has not yet formally indicated that an agreement is the solution to mitigate their potential.,impacts, Therefore, as ade.Oate mitigation toward resal,stion of potential ' significant impacts has not been reached, staff is unable to make the determination in favor of preparation of a Negative Declaration.. i PLANNING; b*ISSW.N'STAFF REPORT GPA 89-426, MA 8944 - FUTURE ESTATE, INC. October 11, L)89 ;t Page 3 1� Ili. 'LAND j9SE ANALYSIS-' ' A 4.ppropriateness of the existing. "Office" designation - The f'site is borderedtion the north by a secondary arterial (Church r` Street) nd on the west,by Archibald 'Avenue, a major arterial f( with, tra,"fic volumes in excess of 22 500 vehicle trips a day at the intersection. The interior ldt Tines abut Medium multi-family land uses. `.` Generally, the location, of offices adjacent to multi-family, units is an acceptle•_land use relationship when the offices form a buffer from the, t,nois and 'activity of the• arter,.ial streets. -Offices:'ar.e viewed as only a slightly more intense land use. than multi-family` residential` and therefore compatible to each other when appropriate buffering -,techniques are empinyed when developed. The Development Code further states tat, "Site development standards are`designedto.make such a ;es (in the *OP' district)--rela,, ively compatible With residential uses,, The issue of'dispersed' office sites was raised late in 1986 by the. City Council. As a result, a 'General Plan Amendment JMk 4-pplication (GPA 86-03E)tr`was initiated by the -City Council to . change the Tand. use category for this, site to Mediurr, Residential: At the public hearing, a representative of the ,.property oWner spoke agai<ist the proposed: change and the Planning Commission recommended' denial of,the amendment. The City Council upheld ( the' recd+xmendation\ of the Planning Commission and the Office` designation 'remaine�on�the site. The General Plan statet7, however, "The intent of )his, land use category (Office/f oreillonal) is to prevent the] rolifera.tion of individual isolated offices." S7nce' I the closest commercial/office area to this site is about 1/, rtJate to: -the south_{set.-Exhibit "A"}, tfie'=above '"mentioned'"General Plan provision is not evident with the existing office designation B, Approariateness of multi-family uses in the: area The close proximity of existing single family and multi-family uses presents no inherit land use conflicts for this proposal. There are 64 units in the apartment: complex bordering this site on the south, multiple family condominiums to the east, and primarily single family residents to the.nortb and west. \ter f PLANNING COMMrSS169 STAFF REPORT !� � GPA 89-02C, DO A 8944 - FUTURE:USTATE, INC. n p, October 12, 1989 _ Page 4 � Recently the City Council "expressed concern regarding the }° increase in multi-family developments. After reviewing a study .which predi-.ted a 65 percent single family/35' percent multi-family housing mix at buildout,:;oiembers of the Council determined`that a• goal of 75 percent/25 percent mix would be more appropriate':'to maintain a.predominately.single!"`family community character. Approval of this application would be; a land use change in conflict with this goal. To put the proposed change of 3,556 acres to Medium multi- family ,development 'In perspective with the City as a whole, this amendment iiPuld represent:" .43'perc,44.'increase in the multifamily acreage. 35 percent increase (based on a total of 44 units at ` 75 percent of development range) in the multi-family NJ units at buildou.t The enactment of-the proposal therefore, .Would not present a significa'it increase in the multi-family dewelopinent within the community. Ak C. Conformance with the General Plan, and';Qevelo ment Code - The Medium density, B-14 owe �ng units per acre classification allows a wide range of living accommodations ranging from conventional single family units and mobile homes to townhouses. Building intensity at the; lower end of the medium density range would be appropriate adjacent to. Lod and Very Low density residential areas and the housing types common to this "Tower end of the i'� ngs would likely be -characterized by detached single family housing units., Building intensity at the mid or higher'end of the ra�geT'may'be more appropriate along transit routes and major and secondary thoroughfares, and near activity cente�rsx Development at this level of e semi-detached or attached units. intensity would riormallyj Medium density residential`also serves�s a buffer:*tween low density residential areas and, higher" density, c�.`mntercial activities and areas of;greater traffic avid noise levels. The location of Medium density residential at this site would not exhibit any land use conflicts with existing General Plan provisions. E PLANNING COMb1ISSIOR STAFF REPORT :- GPA 89-02C, DDA 8544 - FUTLRE ESTATE, INC. October 11, 1989 Page,$ Alm D. _Consideration of alternative designations To provide the Commission with alternatives to the existing and proposed designations, staff has included an analysis of categories similar fin character to those under discussion. For'-this purpose, staff "bracketed" the'land uses with higher intensity on the office side and low intensity on the residential side as follows: ,,1 General Plan - Neighborhood Commercial Development Cod..A- "NV"(Neighborhood Commercial) This category sn4ludes shopping centevs and convenience commercial clusters that provide essential retail goods and services to residdAs in the immediate are'4 The Development Code standards are "intendedCto make such uses compatible to and harmonious with the character of the surrounding :,esidential or less iritense land use area-. Because of the limited size of the subject pvjperty a major tenant like, a super market would probably riot be feasible, thereft;e, a commercial des ignation,,!!would lead to the development of a convenience type strip center. Since there is a major commercial area just 1/4 mile`to the south on Foothill Blvd,,, staff does not believe there is a need for a neighborhood commercial development at this site. General Plan - Low-Medium 4-8; dwelling units per acre Development Code, - "LM (Low-Medium '4-8 dwelling units per acre) The° General Plan states, "the Low-Medium category is characterized by residential densities somewhat lower than the Medium density group. -.The housing 'types permitted at the 4-8 dwelling units per acre include typical single family, single family zero lot line,.,...duple'x and under certain condit.ons up ' to 44 townhouse,-` ,ype units This category would-'''be appropriate with ip(low density areas to encourage, greater housing daversity,without changing the single family character of the surrounding�resi'dential area". The designation of the site to "LM" instead of "M" would reduce the maximum potential unit count from-4g to 28. The character of the residential portion of the block on which the site is located has been established as, Medium by the General Plan and Development Code. 'Therefore, if the site is deemed acceptable for residential uses, it would seem appropriate to continue 6e Medium density character off the abutting area to the sour". � ti PLANNINW COMMISSION S1',,�FF REPORT GPA 89-02C, DDA 89-04 -,FUTURE ESTATE, INC. October 11, 1989 Page 6 AMC if � the PlazotP9,Ptommission believes either, of these, alternative designations is v�. appropriate, a final determination should be withheld ud'til staff can provide an environmental analysis, for the preferred alternative. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS.��'Based on the facts and conclusions 'fisted above, +staff believes the Planning Commission can make the findings regarding ;General Plan, Development Code, And land .use provisions favorable to this application as follows-, ' 1. The property is suitable for Vhe uses permitted in the proposed land use and development district`designation' in terms of access and size as evidenced by the 'site exceeding the City's minimum lot' size requirements, and compatibility with existing surrounding land uses by the site being bordered on the east and' south,by parcels with the "same land use designations; and 2. The proposed -amendments are in conformance with the General Plan a..es Development Code due to the site's capacity to promote the 'goals and objectives for residential development. However, because of the potential unmitigated school services impact mentioned by 'the Central School District, staff does not believe a favorable environmental impact statement can °be made for approval of the amendment. V� CORRESPONDENCE; These items have been advertised as a public hearing in the The Daily_R<<port newspaper, the, property posted, and notices sent to all property owners within 300_feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATIONt Because of the school services impact- -issue, staff believes the fallowing determinations should be considered by the Planning Commission: A. That the General Plan and Developmmaent District Amendments be denied based upon no definitive mitigation measures available for implementation of the school impact issue at this time. "Ii the Commission favors this option, staff would recommend that the denial be "without prejudice" so that the applicant could reapply at anytime if a mitigation measure solution is found'; or PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 39-02C, DOA 89-04 - FUTURE ESTATE, INC. October 11, .1989 Page 7 B. That the: General Plan and; Development District Amendments 'te ;continued until a more , definitive agreement arrangement is presented which clarifies the mitigation measures on the school impact issue (the . Central�'School District'apprears to be willing to 'work-'" on a solution with the applicant and City); or. G. That the Planning Commission determine that the potential impact, from t1,e land use change; of approximately 36 additional i,students (elpAntary and high school) is not sufiic,ient to result in a significant effect an school services. With such a determination the Planning Commission can .,ter,�-,pnend a Negative Declaration and then consider approving 'the`'.GPA and ODA applications. Re fully..s etted, Br Ile City Planner 'BB:AW:js Attachments: Exhibit "RIO - General Plan and Development District Lowation Maps Exhibit "BI - Site Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - School Enrollment Figures Exhibit 'IV - Letter from Chaffey Joint Union High School, District- Exhibit."F - Letter from Central School District t it i '.1 Low .. .�•� � !: •Low ....� . ' ;•�4 •,3s '— MOddIiPSE• g�( LOW •ee: k • •:•'.:.e' r.•. ; _ General Plan Map. MN . � •aeon e • e a e e e y q• :e: { o•aoeo / •� ' •..•••.•�a�eeose� plc H aaeee ••�•••s e• .epap eeeeeo�'e ' K M'H. LM am, LM HC KcPA L LK Deveto . nt ®hatric� Map _ ®: '® 8 A4 Rc t r 17 CITY OF N CUCAMONGA TI�A•., 'dPA 69-02C;RA SS®n PLANNING DIMION TME, WA/DDA Location Ma pa ` 't`I 401.�. Low t i t ®� 7.-4 PUTAG .co.a/d ` a ..-a ; �t ®1s `a1NGt �At"i14�! E'IRTY tow My ffoy ple ®a a � , o• oa .tom! t�FST."Im VACA�T -3fr DuA� c, '8 S'-6�'�a�ITeG, • H �; toceS 3 $� •� m u�.m as «M• w i�a wa Sri-'..-aes •a-':emu .. A. ICAIi1" FUTUM 'PTA ,, INC. ��t U 7711 GC-NTM A VM. sTF- 'PLA.oIliING T % ICii41 +ei/14DA het®�t&p•: rR<_t � {a ` — q, � A3aa ar a -11llt _ k jl a IN 42 ~ ? a =. 1-7 ME e'iQNd!$ �"IWI17"dV 1 CITY` OF:ItAi4t �3 C,U CAM ONGA rrm. PLANNING DI'MION avg She Pmn, � C EJ'Ftwi-n SCALE: Y' Z.. i` z P DISTRICT' WIDE SCHOOL.ENROLLMENT FIGURZS for combined ,CPA's 89-02A A D NEW STUDENTSl' CURRENT CAPACITY GPAI2 89- 2 X OF TOTALDI STRICT ,ENROLLMENT ,PERMANENT TEMP 02A'�� 02C ) ENROLLMENTS. Central 4281 25123 42633 24 : .5 30 .7 .1.3 Chaffey 4520 3800 4620.±,. 5 .09 6 A .2' 1 as generated by the'a ' Icipat-4d residential of the GPA'S. pxa ect on the sites 2 % of current enrollmer_`c-distaict wide 3 figures from City'Master Environmental Assessment-1488 i i f PLANNI4eG''DMSI®N TnIF:SO ENROLLMENT MG-51 ` a € Ch6ffey Joint �n��n High iwh0 l ►.Arid h211 WEST FIFTH STREET,ONTARIO,CALIFORNIA 91762-1698 (7141 9P8.8511 \1 SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS:. f/` ASSOCIATE SUPERINTENDENT ISOARD MEMBERS Dean E.Snafhas INSTRUCTION -Hafhleen E.;Kmley -tbene B.,FWrnson em C.Manor arstalL ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT. Raymond J.Santa 'PERSONNEL Charlexl Uhalwy .Donald E,:Culp - Gerald W.Wolf August 17, 1989 tT hUtj Wi111arrs fcnitects; Inc: .- r • t 276 N . Second Av®. �y�j��(z�jlttl.,..`-.•ftltr)jli U an CA 91786 ATTN: Kent Wu RE Archib<id/Church Townhomes With'rnference to the City' four questions in their letter of August 8, 1989 to you: t T. 'Yes, your project will impact the Chaffey.'District's ! ability to provide adequate service to the residents of the the district. The Chaffey.Dist,`-tct will be able to provide adaquate service yhen Rancho Cucamonga High School is dam- pleted. 2. The Chaffey District uses a generation factor of .15 students per unit. 3. The Chaffey District currently has trailer classrooms at Etiwanda High, School. The Disttrict also currentlxHs in expansion .construction at Etiwanda High School. lt> is funded by the State. The District plans to construct Rancho' Cucw--nna High .C.t-Ml c, cH5?. 1992, depending on funding. The funding for RCHS will be from the State and/or�iftl` o-Roos funding and/or developer fees. The District:rplans-to build another high school in Rancho Cucamonga, to open in Tg94 or 1995, also to be fund- ed by the State and/or Mello-Roos and/or developer fees. a. Yes, 'the Chaffey Distri^t does have a .comprehensive master plan. it reflects'the population growth of the District, construction of the two above=mentioned high schools in Rancho Cucamonga, construction of another high school in south Ontario; and miscellaneour. improv"ents of'other facilities, 4i l,^1 &CHOW- ALTA LOMA CHAFFEY ADULT EDUCATION.CNAFFEY•ETIWANDA•raONTCLAIR•ONTARIO1 4 VALLEY VIEW f Williams Architects August, 17, 19&9 Arch:!�_' Church Townhomes Because, the Schools_irs the-Chaffey':D�strici:'are`fmpactatl;--and -because State funding is so uncertaint, :the Chaf-fey District recammettd_,.':that;the City require cievelopers to enter into a.mitigationr,� greemerlt Faith the .01strict. �'I 6aliave you have a draft of that agreements 'If you Nash to discuss this matter fsr.- ther please call. =' Sincerely, STEPHEN L. 66TTERS Director, Business Services } SLB/sb j f� cc: Alan Warren; :d'ity of Rancho Cucamongs 7i lr l Y I � r, i ! '� '� _� _ ,pp.. gy�pp,, ,per ADMINJSTR477QN Cc - '. - fiJR66ttNTKPIptMt 9457 Kati.N44 Blvd.(Rancho Cucamonga, Caf]forrnia 91730/ 714?g89.-854 td .as cY.aurY. au�i a Ness - wffT.ftaMT.rrNf7raueytaN August 22, 1989'" t [•3 1» Mr. Xent'Wa. AIA Williams Architects, Inc.. 276 North Second Avenue Upland. cA 0.1786 Dear Fir. Wu: In response to your August Ia, 1989 letter, l am providing you with the information you requested concerning,the impact of your ArchEbald/Church 40 townhome project. You asked for answers to fo5r questions. Question Ols Will your project impact the school distri'ct's ability to provide adequate service to the residents of this districts? If_sor under what conditions can the districts provide adequate service? Response; Yes your project will further overcrowd an alrea( nvsrcrowded school. We can provide adequate service iF,we had additional classroom space. Question d2-- what is tIte student generation factor(s) w}:ich' the districts use for determining the number Of studentsexpected from your project?. Response: The student generation factor used by the district is .7562;per unit. Question i3. Do the school districts have plans for portable classrooms or to construct additional school facilities to handle the increased student'enrollments? If sot what is the projected time frsme and funding sources? Response. We have portable classrooms on every site in the school district to- handle the evar--iiiereas��ng'student enrollment.' we are presep,�.11-y ting the third and final phase: of Hear. Gulch ' School. Ws are currently working on State applicationa for three addiyiond schools -- Terra'vista 11 for 1991, Ruth Afus3ser Meddle School for 1992, and the Coyote Canyon glementary School for° 199 replace the temporary school built by Lewis Homes. This funding source is the State of California and at present no fw us s arenavailabl-s, However, we hope to be funded if the voters approve a school building bond issue at the next>election.. 90ARp i)F TRUSTEES Herely L 910y Antorili G RoBRn Debbie 11410 Ruth A.MUD Andre W my Of Prc�ident CIrrR' = : �4embc�r� Member AttmDev j C _ Mrr, Rent Wu, AIA �a4e Two, 8/22/89 Question 64 Oo the'idistric'ta have'a comprehensive master planrQr 5-y'aar action plan? if so, what do they entail? ^r " Response: Yes, we do have a comprehensive {nas:er plan diid our S ye1ir',action'plan Is described, in Response '#$ ahovP. trust this is an adequate response to your concerns. sincerely, et V �` , Ingrid Vogel Assistant Superintendent, Susiness Services �J } �l l I � 10,, G i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, STAFF REPORT DATE: October 11, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner Cindy Norris, Associate Planner SIVECT: RAL SCHOOLDISTRICT GENERATION RATES G�Q ; I & AGENDA E & I Since the writing of the GPA 89-02A and 02C rep 'its, additional information regarding the student generation rates has come to our attentjoo. Instead offs generation factor of .7562 (students/unit) fov% single family development for the anticipated elementary students, a lower .4252'figure is used;by Central School District as 'an overall rate for the district. See attached Central :School District letter with amended note, dated October 9, 1989 from Ingrid Vogel.. Therefore, the following number of students is tiow expected from the two GPA developments: Rate 1; Students student/units x units. = generated GPA 898-02A :' .y Chaffey High School .15 32 Central Elementary .43 32 34 Subtotal 19 GPA'R9-02C Chaffey High School .15" 40 0 Central Elementary .43 40 17 f Subtotal 2s " TOTAL 42 In addition, attached.are revised Exhibits "D" (GPA 89-02C) and "I" (GPA 89-02A) which reflect amended school enrollment percentages,for the revised student generation'figures. G' r ti 4> PLANN '3" COMIS,�€ION STAFF R.EFORT GPA.89-02A,`& OZC. P.G. AGE110A ITEMS E &.I October 11, 1989 to Page 2 Res p lly,I ted Bra Lu _r city a ner BB:CN:mlg Attachments: Exhibit " - GPA 89-02C Exhibit "lti' - GP A 89,-02A ~` Letter FroO,' ntral School District ('s I ,1 t, DISTRICT WIDE ,';CHOOL, ENROLLMENT FIGURES for combined jLx NE43 STUDENTS 1 CURRENT CAPACITY' -"�' GPA' 89- OF 1`O.AL' DISTRICT ENROLLMENT PERMANENT (TEMP), \;Qil'A ,LA�� 1%02C �_2 E NTS Central 4281 25123 4Z 3 Chaffey 4620 380Q 4620+ `' 5 .09 6 .1 .2 1 as generated by the anticipated t\esidential project on the sites of the GFAs:— 2 % of .current enrollment-district wide 3 figures from City Master Rnvlrori"ental Assessment-1.9861, r� ,E i.' ��?� � •jot i� /`� ► FTC SSI-�NLM + ARCH. �kE1� a.r -�?att�58�A oct 9,89 15,:5roct ZrWIA M.-Jones Aa.oaa" �g3rQ3""" �a,re•:a>gl�,tit,��ro �4S! Foothill Blvd,t Rancho Cucamonga,e:aitiornea Ste Q 1 t7141' 61.854t kwid,Net :A7tiT,sfLe►Y'.t�4lM�1etA glarva I-NOVI July 24, 1980 Asssv.svrr.,tNeDtltLs r[cM t Kr.'r-z�ad�hy J. �atk3na �f ,��' •�=7 Project Architect PitaAsi-Oalasatt Architects 9697 Sa.ven Avenuot Suitt 224 4 Rancho Cucamonga, CA S?,73s2,' Dear sir, WatkiAO, Z asn in zoaeipt bC Your,-July 26th letter $ealinq with your platlnsd, construction on trp ;pest fide of,Carnelian street at tfiaa intasatecttan of Carnelian and vlvlro. You asked .:or, anewary to tea questidAt. Question !ls dill the Conttal School ttistriat and the :paciti+a EleetnaAfisXy School which sorties this project be impact6d at the ti 4 this project will bajoccapted tappyoxiaiatehy. August 1'9gQ17 Respohaa: V411e ,tjsta Elementary schcoi,)s+erves tUs area, it is overcroksded At;tha present tits and, yes, it,will be impa000, even further; at the time that p-4*4*ct is completed. r, Question #2t Based upon the Specific iYtotmation supplied conGorninq,this project, will'! our project%eve a s3J'ttitiaant AtJ&tiver i.r,&nt upon the district? Responsst your planer to lAiji;ld 3 'l3-bedroom, 21 E-bath homes wiii, haw,a significant pse%4tile J�paot upoA the district.' We vrich that we could-give-.YOU di£fesate 3nr0"s t,ion► ;*)ut we cant t. 'It you have any additio al questions, ux know, � Sincerely, Erwin Ht. Jones Superintendent, s4? goneratimh tactor ror contval_School Viottictt is# Single Family Homes • .75G2;. Dtist>l.at Overall Alvorage .fix5a 7 WARP Of tsitai(ts !!lnty s$eay �tnsaei7 L.Roles! Qehble►att< R4ih A.Mussat tlndrcrr 7ixioi [Ie+d +imbr+ r,rs.Ct�f _ { 3� d�.. c•.", �ycrt,a rrwgq,u7, �...„a:±.h. [- ,3= r��,,, 5 40-M Y0'W 0rQA''OLWIL WPM?" ct�r7tt1 H rqR cEN �s�l ems*rouArh s7Juar,�art�lx TetErmw(na,ir*zw SCti4.k E.Cg1EA7 W17A ANk CAUPDANYA g:tfY rc�W7wEa play�7yn�d -VAINAd}))OTT PEP,OUR FL£ 'W AM 0*.FLMN uAa 0.04Ly October .l,i, 198% OOUGtA$V.VEOMM C�„�� '!)AUsE 1.K*4 CVNtI kAb vo" r zA2k %Uan WSLI,IAx ARCHITRCTS 276 !i, Secorid A,Yenue Upland CR 917$G: Attn: Kent Wu < Re: propasad 44 T®wnholtes In Central. unified School'District Dear Hr. Vhiu letttr is:Addressed to you on bahalP eP Central School District regarding tha: prcpe>sed daySloptent 'of 40 townhoxos 100et0doat Archibald emd Church in tho City of Rancho Cucamonga,. "tha District is advised that 4Q -mite will be Constructed. District Staft has computes) the total i4atation,of the project on the sChcola~ of the AitstriOt based. Upon adding uaw # �, fAOil,itiOs to exieting school sites: Thy.total 'impaction f3ff N dasr,act by tta pistrict ie tt? OM of 00$4$4. Than a= is estftated to be approximately $20,744 above the,tleve7 opor Yeas collected purcua�t to stag legiglAtion :.,�s zsastter will` be ambmittesd to the Boatrd of Trustees of the *oh6ol District Werin9*4oy,, October ia. Tho posit on Of tha Dfr-trict Statt and the under.}igned'aaatingr aa'attorney for the District is that if the City Of Rambo Ducamonga W4.1:L impota a reouirftreht of paypeOt to tho District of,as total i ataeunt of $65,544 l5ayable an 18swvtnoe of building pa mtitst,. the uistrict.will canny that this aabount Vill orov da acho*1 i;hplilkWYendraasw.75Js �r �\ , t 111.1 1Y-•tz'� lY:� k"�9:kk i4 �.t?\IEFt� ,4 , �t tjwWPICefr coV UT 'ARItF t2 ANI► Mp Kent wu 006bor lit ]99g hio rift whiCb 'P' fooilities for the Cei treS Sotcbol t �xc�oat. eduaatia� of r.IMOOS IC tp1`..M;c►'8 tot h3 Vazy iiuly`youv5s 1 tan k S srintencYent, central.$.n« copy= flames Aam xmasr,uCitY A.torn�y, Rnnaho Cnasamonq ,n r � , Sct+FllttD�o�ntrel:nt.�5a �I v U, -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPO!ty� DATE: October 1L 1989 i TO: Chairman and "aembers of the 'Plannt;kr oo'nmission FRft Barrye R. Hanson, Senior rivii Engineer � BY: Betty A, Miller,:Associ ^;e Civil Engineer SUBJEa': ` ENVIRONkNTAL ASSESSMENT:AND 7,ENTAT.IVE PARCEL MAP-12,JSi , Southland Irevelopment Gor2oration - W—S-URIVISIOD OT 9.377acrps of I anc,;;f to parce s in, Ine, LOW esidential Development: District, 'Iodated at the southwest corner of Highland Avanue`and Ja per Street (APP,201 212-12) . I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested; Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as s own on, x i f,, se B" B. Parcel Size: Lot 1 - 5.08 Acres Lot A - 4-:29 -Acres (Reserved for future Route 30) C. Existing Zoning Low Residential 0. Surrounding Land Use: North - Single Family Residential South - Single Family+;Resident~at East - Existing Church !Jest - Vacant (approved Tentative Tract 12820) E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Gode Cosignations Nor$h -r Ow Residential: South. - Low Residential East - Low Residential:.:' ;Vest - Low Residential it. r� 73" PLANNING• z.,;;:j.,SSION'tTAEF'REPORT r. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12357 -`SOUTNLAND DEVELOPMENT;CORPOR1TIUN ` OCTOBER 11, 1989 PAGE 2 F. Site Characteristics: The site is;yacant and slopes to the south at'four percent. 11. ANALYSIS:' L�. ' The purpose of this Parcel .-Map,Js to.create' 2,separat�parcels, one for fl�sura re�identiat , development (Lot-. 1)'fiq& ore:. for acquisition by Cal trans as .right-of_ieaay-`.`for the Route 30 Freesday .(-,of Ai Cal trans has approved the proposed oonfigui�ation Of Lot A as shawn4 All improvements ai t] be :prcrvi.aest• upon development of Lot 1 i nc1 udi n9 a�tY necessary improvements exteNdiRg across :Lot A, YYI. ENVIRO?t19EtiTAL itEVlEW:, The applicant coop leted' Pant I"t of the Initiali �. ;tuoy. ca coated a field inVestigati0n and cempleted Part "tI t f he Initial Study. No zdderse impacts, upon the' r,.vironment' are anticipated a; "a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of<Ne.gativ32 Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sont.to surrou!aing proper owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. M V. RECOMMENDATION• It is c•ecotMieaided•'that the Planning Cosxnission consider a npu and elements of the Tentative Parcel Nap 12357. if after �'�ch consideratfion, the Coma►�ssion;can. reco shd inprovalI. then the:adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R, Hanson Senior Civil dngi seer BRH:BAM:sd Attachments: Vicinity 14ap'(Exi��b' t "A") '- Tentative Map_ tExMbit 064) Resolution and Recar.�ended Conditions of,',pproval -iwms r e�> WC ' l,aa .,# E� ■�a; ■ rr� �'s�aiis ^. or.. a�� ..,�. z!�®A�®�� . '� ,��'��- ,� �.■ y R® Aa #o► �. .i : ... �_. way ®!�'/'1�11�M1 '�+`► ,�:� �ww ir. � a. .e, ,a, '� Ii®1�9>t �;#11I®J��i11111�1i1,� r r�f ,. .r- r.w wer .rr . � a�•� �+e �: `� '� ttr as a■ �Irrr atw ww iw,n its � 's �� r ,� w '� a � w w. ® war ■ w,� ,,� i>Ffi/1l��Mo1�®lli llsi111]Ii!!l1ia� +� .��.r wr at iairr <. , oy d- -� 6- ..R -atl� � �� rr s�70��■ rEs`��,r r�■ s F- �I MIA was alA ar a!r sq sr� s� P� r� ants. ar saq wr ww r■ rr r YWin ata® ■. sir w�rr ` aR ®w' w sr antes aarw . s s air- ■r• ■r a■r ■r ®r ,'�;;w r�rw rr wy!; � � rR #� w. sus �.w #� � �� q*itd `� r1R sa aat(Itei ar t® ,u.w ss as w„� aa� aorta sr w■ ■■ ss ra rim att4 rrs as ar r mat rw r�r ®,� r4s ®11 � r ��rI's ■iitRaD�fR/llali�lalRiirR Ri ®�. �,,, .rra // //■/. rw 4�3r��r�:��t°®rr� it®� ,p a•�oa'��t �►:. .. a r• ar1�1 w Af wri /!i ®,f► �rfi p 'A SAM MEN M M. ,�� ale ar *r ■ ■ ■ POk///�■// ales ris atrr ari. ..�r ww a ' ® ■ert ar �■ �■ rr set !�//i1fRX® .�. r� 10t� w.i �tt". .�`. aw �s ter:•'� P R tr.� l9 ■ar wa B an fan s■ s Opdfi�N//ii 44 ON$ I NMI �, /yN1i!! i1Ru✓!1 � eliii. a®rt' � � s' ars •ri 4 r a rrw ti �R„si YRiilliillaf�l "� � iaaaa:��' ■n'iY�aartaa�i �� '=a+ • ,i', �" �wny:. j SARRIIRE STREET SAN STREET DYED STREET JASPER STREET- iF' RG 932i 'g g NIGHLAHO� g ` AVUUE ] g mew a LOT JA RIVE lb 0. i . • of s LOT A ° RSERVED.IN NriME nUrE 30 �23 Acnt•' Y � a00•ir A'! grtl• �� — /wra�eraU� V••Ii \rl�� ! I,MM' ,� � ` f1lU `•a.a.o.of �''.I j [RICE..NQ �9Ss:� N It �137 i3!.361 _•�]a bt;. _ r CHO CUCAMONGA O a, DIMON `° °' C� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION;4F THE:PLANNING COMI=S&ION OF THE CITY OF, RANCHO cuuMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ,CONDITIONAQ.,y' APPROVING TENTATIVE 'PANCk D MAP NUMBER. 12?S7, LOCAPID AT ,.THE ` SOClTRWESI CORNER F HIGHLAND AVENUE AND JASPER'STREET APN 201-212-12 r . WHEREAS, .el Map Number 12357. submitted by Southland . Development Corporation, app.( .��nt, ,for the purpose of subdividing _into 2 parcels, the real property s€tuated• in the City"of Rancho'.Gucamonga, County. of San Bernardino, ',Staff of California,':idein fied as APN(s) ,201, 21242; located at the southw*st cornpr,of Hig;hianti Avenue and Jasper Street; :and ' WhEREAS, on October 11, 1980, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public 'nearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RMCHO CUCAv. -VPLANNIW%OtRiiSSION RE tOLVED AS FOLLOWS: r� SECTION 1: That tjie'f6llowing findings have been made:, !. That the crap is consistent with the General Plan 2. That the €tnprovemed of tyre proposed subdivision is, consistent with the General, Plan. 3. That the, • site is. physically. suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the ;proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environrpental damage or public health .problams or have adverse. affects on abutting property. SUTION'2• This CoMission finds and certifies that the project has been rev a ed a `considered in compliance:With the,California Envtrorinental Quaiit,*, Act of 1570 AN, further. this Comis0on h''ereby issues 'a.Negative. Declaratiar►. �-�, s 'Y SECTION if That Tentative Parcel Map No: 1235? is�riereby approved subJect to,,'ie'"attached -Standard Conditions and the folio wing Special Conditions: a L. A .permit will be 1Qquired from no for any work within their righ`c-of-way,. x PLANNING COHMI'SSION RESOLUTIC,X N0. � TENTATI11r-PARCEL MAP 1E357 tQ`41THLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OCTOBER 11, 1989 = 1' PAGE 2 � 4' Z. Any necestary impr:aernts extending, across Lot A' shall be I constructed upon the development of Lot 1. (� 3,. The; area,,„along Jasper Street is designated as-a'Flood Zone A;, thef+efom" sufficient :flood :'protection �asures- shall: be designed and cgnsti'vcted,upon d0elopmehL of t.'parcel No. I APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS, V< Ty DAY OF OCTO'BM, 1989-. PLANNING .COMISSI6Y OF THE CITY OP'RANCHO'CUCAMONG' Larry T. MqNiel iRan ATTEST: Brad Su er, SecretHlry ' i I, 'Brad Buller, :Secretary of t e ,ola�-.ag' Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, do hereb; certifyll the .foregoing Resolution .Was duly= and regularly introduced, passed, a v adopted by the Planning Commis ion of the City of.Rancho Cucamonga, at a reOuIar meeting of the Planning Commiasion:held on the 11th day,of October, 1989,, y the f .17aw1ng vote-to-suit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: f ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: s (f T, ;'s i 4 i Cr `5 C' 7 IIIG4i x , ?•O Vi y •7a 2 e L CQ sC f C I t Y ' oVfN I ZR. lo \�' Q Yyam' IlCO G� YL Y� u. d =R .2 { CY•4 �e r �G••-• n -YN �a'I�\` !1 rs_�gu 2 CSU a G0 yyfla F 2 u eO _ O a••W Y a l gP 6 e1 9 C. s Mo.w•u� t �a..G..'.i.0 in.Xu r,e23 v <� .� .4 m _ M� � L • �uu _p{ p« � IIc —14 y i G , Y Lc• C y• a:4 � r` Q of 4r r £ •`G y`y 9..� 'TL mEY Ci V CL_ A •� p 9 N a T GY7t 'A d 6 ^ Ll w 9 W V �p�{ b �.6�N 9` 9 • !� • y�N` 90 •• u, P1, �C N w 9 t g� V '.,�g �V � ) � 1 GG.t• Y�V�O w m N uw- tee a'dYES ie$!b wv' 30 .ce5v G.e a e 4 a s o� ••. � y (gyp.i p Y J Zt K Eb y< w�� Q ,moo TY� lE v v a o a w s C� MFC. Dy � .Y{pY Or ^Cr CAR LYr LO 'uy nL'N yA� 1F3 YM �wv.l w O4 OY _ 1� p P I+ Y � •Y^ t M C t O Q 4 0 4 W� yr {y�M� �SyM Y yy�M qy�C >pyd �'Vrc� J a1 3 U j� VK ryaYy yVy NVY Kt<v3i 6 RD yy IS 4,: i � 4. . L Y O D A '{✓.LQ� , �A Y . ` C C NQ O W Y' zt h 4 e.C4 p1 z y u.� Q� y4Y ��4wt8 �t3f4. a oao;. .so p5■ y�� ' gal, 8 14 ggg n � .. g. s c4L Hp- Is o,&e •Y '. �4�@y{ L V Or .': -a`i` I i {w{ wr CITY 0F RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �f 13ATE: October 11, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comniss!bn FROM: Barrye ft. Hanson, Senior Clvil Engineer, — BY: Batt; A: Miller, Associate Civil ;Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONNEMTAL_ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL_MAP ,12629 - Shum A suoeivision ti . acre-, o an into- J parcels in te Low Residential Development District,; located ,on the north side of,Base' Line Road, west of Beryl Streeti (APH 02431-30) I<. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as sown on Union "B„ B. Parcel Size;` Parcel 1 15,223.5 sq. ft. — Parcel 2 13,649.0 sq. ft. Parcel 3 12 418.5 sq., ft. Total 41,184.0 sq. ft. (0.9� Net Acresb C. Existing4oning: , Low Residential D. Surrounding Land Use: North - Single Family Residential �. South - Office Complex East .Single Family Res `dent-ag West - Single Family Residential E. Surrounding General Plan' and Development Code Designations: f North - Low'Residential i South - Office/Professional East - Low Residential West,- Low Residential r MrvH PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12629 - SHUNt OCTOBER 11, 1989 PAGE 2 F. Site Characteristics: There is an existing single family -residence (to be removed) on the site. near the-Base Line Road frontage. The 'balance of the site slopes' to the southeast at about 4 percent. An .existing asphalt driveway extends to the-,gear of the site along the cast site boundary. IL. ANALYSIS: The pure se of this Parcel Map is to subdivide a one acre Parcel into three (3) single family parcels, The paecels.are designed with x"lags to: Base Line'Road, because-of the unusual shape of the property. Also, the parcels will share A common driveway in order to minimize the number of . access conflicts on Base'Line Road. The location of the driveway on Base Line Road is an ,issue. The applicant originally proposed: and continues to prefer the tonf;�_uration shown on Exhibit "S". S `f has 'required that the project be redesigned (Exhibit "C") to align the driveway with an existing driveway o5 06'_ , opposite (south) side of Base Line Road. This, will minimize pot ntial traffic conflicts in particular head-on left turn-movements. AisoU this location provides the maxims m separation from the intersection of Base AAbk Line Road with Beryl Street, which is signalized and therefore subject to left turn stacking. The applicant objects to the required project redesign because it creates a cross lot drainage situation from Parcel 2' to Parcel I and places�.the . pad on Parcel i at a lower elevation than-the drive aisle. Neither of those conditions is., unique or unusual. Staff feels that traffic;safet- on Base Line Road is more significant than the objections raised by tii�` applicant, therefore the Resolution contains a condj'cion (:Special Condition No. 1 under Engineering) requ1:1ng the configuration shown on" Exhibit "C". " I III. ENVIRONMENTAL REYIEW: The r:ppl-reant completed part I of the Initial Study. a con ucted a field investigation and completed Part II of P the Initial Study, No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. ,71' ,,efore,,issuance of Negative declaration is appropriate. ` IV'. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Nearing have been sent to surrounding. property owpers and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper.. Posting at the site has also been completed. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP-12629 —$HUM OCTOBER'11, 1989 PAGE 3 V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning'Commission conilder a11L input an el"ants of_the Tentative Parcel Map 12629, , If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a'Negative Declaration Would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted;, Al Sarrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRN:BM:sd Attachments. Vicinity;Nap (Exhibit "A") Tentative Asap (Exhibit "B") n? � liternatve Tentative tap (Exhibit "C") Resolution' and ` ) Recomme0ded Conditions of Approval qw �4A !■!■ ® �iel�ru�o 1111tu! te111IM1i . ®1c ®®!llIBM ago .,. ulz now ■t/■ ■i■■■iili■■ ■ii1Uu, itinr�► r llif 11■ ■ ■■■i!■!!■!■ 'atoll■i!/lt�� —n1°r 40 i/i/ `i®■ ■■Hppi/■■ i i�4 1■,l■■IIif1I►�Illl�, ®� .s Palo along gag 11�1111111tA11 NINE AAI■■Ui■11® 1 .. ■■■■■■■ ■■■■ ■ !■■� �11 ��1 �.. ae,r;'f!■N� is !!!!■! o® . ® a a = �� ..® eNINONor `_, ■..■ ram! .. . �.til■ As �s I .. ■ b I 7 g ! w 21 NMI CrrY OF I ELM RANCHO CUCAMONGA .TENTA MAP WGI � r14� S9 ON EXMBM. ,a oil PAD � f 92U f r PAD 5z.2 SAMLINE ROAD r i MY OF rmL. PMLEL MAP )'2h2q RANCH® CUC ONGA m ��°1��. �AP1A I-r. G G D ON i5 -{ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF' THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP'',NUMBER 12629, LOCATED ON Tk NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE' ROAD WEST,, OF BCRYL STREET , APN 202-231-30: WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number I2629, submitted by Simon Shum, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing,-into 3 parcels, the real property situated in,the City of Rancho Cucamonga,-County 6,)San Bernardino, State of California, J' entifi2d as APN 202-231-30, located on the north oP Base Line Road'. west of Beryl Street, and WHEREAS, or, October 11, 1969, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-descicibed map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PL;1NING C%iMISSION gESJLVE0 AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 'S. That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with ,the General Plan. 2. That'the improvement of the propr,4L,,tubdi vis loft is consistent with the. General Plan. 3. That the site'>;'. physically suitable for the proposed deIveio^, . 4. That the 'proposed subdivision, and improvements will ^t a use substantial Lln ironTentai damage or public .,iralth problems or, have adverse affects;on abutting property., SECTION 2 This.Comnission finds and certifies that the project has . I been rev eweciT�can cor,,iiz red in compliance, with the California Environmental J Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 33: That Tentative 'Parcel Map .No.. 12629;is hereby approved Subject to thF attached Standard Conditions and i:i4 following ,::,, ecial Conditions-. , Englneerinc The parcel configuration on ,the Final Parcel 'Map shall be k essentially a mirror image of that shown on the Tentative Map, ' with the driveway eligned with the existing driveway `on the South side of.Base Line; Road. n; PLANNING'COMM IssloN-RESOLUTION N0. TcNTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12629 - SHUN U" OCTOBER 11, 1989 PAGE 2 2. An in-Iie`u fee as contribution to the future underground;ing of the existing < overhead utilities (teIdcormnunication and' eTectrfcal) on the project sde'of Baseline Road shall be paid to the City prior to recordation of the,fi;nal:.rarcel Map,._.The fee shal'1 be the full -Cite ad-pted "unit amount times the length ;`� of the pradect frontage d4F; feed, ? The drive approach cted per Citr Standard No. 306 with a 26-foot width. f. All existing drive approaches an Base Line road sh3li h6?removed � and replaced with curb and gutter. 5. A:1 three parcels shall be., graded; the `roitmon',driveway and reta*n',:ng Wall constructed, 'and the privates drainage system on Parcel`1." instal'led to t.6 satisfaction..of the Building Official, prior to recordation of the Final parcel Map. � 6. After`°grad erosion. protection 'shal•1 'b€ prof+ided through hydroseedlig�. , `a soil binder: T. A Homeowner's association is required for maintenance of the common driveway,, landscaping west ;of the drive aisle to and inciOding the retaia ill gall at the north enI, the guest pzrking area, and tite private cross-lot drainage fact•°1ity. A. The entire 'driovay shall be designated,a Fire Lane, with no panting allowed, to the satisfaction of the'Fire Qepartmerit. Plate I. Comr rt .la_ndscaping,arid;_landscape maiRtenance. asem�_rjts hall be:; prov.ided>along the west si.de'of the driveways up to the north , end of the retaining wall. landscape maintenance shall include the retaining hail at the northwesterly end of the%driveway. 2. D'1 ail"J landscape and irr g&t'fon plans for the landscape euseml it area shall be submitted to the Planning Division,f,— reviel*and approval prior to r.ecortittion of the Final Parte Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. J. 0ecorativd" treatment shall be provided for the ,retainirig wall along the northwest end of the drivc4ay on tot 3 to the satisfaction of the City Planner, L l Y� ,i �v} 41 ✓. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NOS � TENTATIVE.PARCEL MAP,:12629 W SNUM ' E OCTOBER 11, 1989 PAGE S 1 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA BY arry T. McNiel,, Choirman r ,r. c. ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary, I, Brad Butler, Secretary `or, the Planning Commisssion of the City of, Rancho Cucamonga,, dd,I here4y..certify that the foregglsI Resolution,, was duly and regularly intioidndd, ,passed, ;and ado .' d by the. Rianni"ng Commission of,the City of Rancho Cucamonga," at a:regulari,meeting of the Planniact Commissio7r held on the 11th day of October, 1g89,.by th"e following vote;;to-wait: AYES: CDMMISS'iON�RS: NOES: COMMIS SIGNERS: ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: .l /i r 7 f m `y p`,.Wjy. ".@ T a`Qgy�� ~°. �VjV 1 b QC 4 Yy V,z -� 'yY qa: Zo YY,Ca IDr by4. .A�� V 'M tl Ck w Ol sr 3..r: •Sg yX'.$ gam; + �� "ffi a ' $'�:� tom. e` •� .. ��Y.tl �bd` Vt bM•ir AAA Is Az ISE 111yG Y�qr'. N sit V _ r- �u q3� L.�V V✓ 9ys._ww 4 H V. �g y 4g+r y S € 5 6 'v 0. Te V a� Is O +L L W ✓_ a N �a� Zy µr V ( �'F N w.A✓ �.�F� n� �C 1R p. .�� ✓4 a M M p l µ V w Qy O ll gg C�'H� Y �y�h Ill; li Itvia y y y F. d ba Ali It as u$ yak' o✓' D� _9 « v rt� � 12, �- - ZZ3 H fl43- Z j p .4't ` c� FBAgp> _ vo c► it e�ea +e o S�i� — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,. STAFF REPORT DATE:. October 11,.1989 I TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad 50.1er, City Planner BY: Cindy Norr ''s,,EAssatoiate Pianner SUBJECT., ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTWAND :GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02A E.G.M. DEVELOPMENT - A request to amend the General P1an,Land Use Map from Flood Control to Medium Density':Residential (8- 14 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 1.78 acres of land located on the west :side of Carnelian Avenue, east of the Cucamonga2 Creek Flood Control Channel, and 'south of Vivero Street - APN: 207-022-64. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT `AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87-12 - E.G.M. > DEVELOPMENT request+ to amend ' the Development Districts Map fr9m Flood Control to Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre),7 for approximately 1.78 acres of land located on the west side of Carnelian Avenue, east of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel, and south of Vivero Street - APN: 207-022-64. RELATED FILE: TENTATIVE TRACT 14263 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a General Plan and Development District Amendment 'to change the land use designation from -1,lood-Cont rol-to Mediom,Densi.ty,Res.ideftial _. ,. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: w North; : Existing single family (proposed multi-family, TT 14263) and Cucamonga County Water District water tank; Medium Density Residential (8-I4 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant with existing drain channel; Hood Control: East - Carnelian Avenue and existing single family•, Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). West' - Cucamonga Creek Flood 'Control 'Charnel=and.,existing single family residences; Flood Control and"Low „`Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units pep gcre). r_. i9 ZM4 I,J PLANNING, COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE; GPA 89-02A & DDA 87-12 - E.G.M DEVELOP. October,11, 1989 Page 2 C_ General',Plan Des igations Project Cite Flood Contro`, -' North - MiA dm Density Residential (8-I4 dwelling units per acre) South -. Ffdo�l Control East - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West` - Flood'*"gntrol and Low Density Residential (2-4 dwellin`i units per acre.) ; D, Site Characteristi, : The subJecs„property iLsVacant with the exception of I a landscaped parkwajp of Eucalyptus• trees and shrubs 'directly adjacent to the` existing curb and flood control channel along, Carnelian(�Avenue. The parcel has',a .. varying topogra-phy with the majority of .the site 'having•`�a grade varyl,g4"from 2 to 5 percent while the portion located ;at the 'southeast end,has slopes varying 'from U to 20 -percent adjacent to the-flood control channel Directly to the nc>rth are three (3) existing older single family homes which are to be removed as parf of the proposed development for Tentative. Tract 14963. Further north is an Ask existing water tank and approximately four (4) singl'e family homes ail_=which currently front onto Carnalian Avenue (see Exhibit "C"). The land north of these homes has been developed Iwith multi-family units. To the east are ex°sting single family homes Which rear onto Carnelian`AvOnue, while to the west, are existing single family homes separ',�:ed' from.the subject property by the Cucamonga Creek Flood, o%,rol Channel (approximately 150 to 200 feet wide). II. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed tfe T'fiitial Study, Part I, a,nd the responses frogs► the,-school, _completed the Env �,?onmental Checklist,' Part 1 of the Tn;//tia7 Study, ar,di, except for school impaction, has found that no(/other significant adverse environmental impacts will occur d`3!' a result of the proposed General Plan. Amendment 89-02A and D `eiopment District Amendment. 87-12, Both the Chaffey High Sci�oal and Central School Districts have indicated that there will be sionifi=nt negative impact on their ability to provide services as a result of the proposed. amendmenh3 and planned residential. project. The potential student gene ration;,for each district as a result'of the proposed amendment will be a`s follows r rl r, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' j RE: SPA 89-02A & ODA 87=1Z - t G.M DEVELOP. October II, 1989 Page 3 ra"e students students/unit x units * generated Chaf fey .High School District .15 32 ' 5 Central School District .:75. 32 24 TOTAL 2.4 '"3ased on a total of 32 Units as requested in the deveiopment proposal,,Tentative Tract 14263. District".Wfde school enrollment figures are attached in Exhibit "1!'. In response to the, district'-, concerns, staff had requested that the applicant work with the school districft 'towards developing agreements to provide .appropriate mitigatfc ,mea.ures. As of this date, the 001i6ant has been able to come to ;,n agreement with the Chaffey Joint High School District,'hut a,,i appropriate mitigation 'measure has not 'beep' reached with (en nteal School District. Staff is currently in L'ontact with the ;'drool district to aid in reaching some form of agreement. Therefore, as adequate mitigation 'toward resolution of potential significant impacts has not been reached, staff is unable to make. the determination in favor of praparation of a Negative Declaration. III. LAND 'USE ANALYSIS:; A. Background; On, June 25, 19,84, ;the subject property` was declared surplus by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors, as improvements to the Cucamonga Creek ;Flood Control Channel_had been completed and the easements 'were no 4zllonger necessary. On March. 8, 1989 th3 Planning Commission reviewed a req�Iest from. Burgundy Creek Ltd. for a proposed Development Dis_trfCt y Amendment from 'Flood Control to Medium Density Residential The Planning Commission found that due to'the `unusual ..site configuration and�`,potential traffic hazards ort Carnelian Avenue, that a determination on land use could not be made until further information was.presented with the application, including a development proposal., and traffic analysis.Additionally, the Planning : Comgttission determined, that a General Plan Amendment would be necessary to change the land Use from Flood Control to Medium Density Residential. 7T+ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF 9EPOPT n RE- GPA 89-02A & GDP. 87-12 i .G.M DEVCLOp. October 11, 1989 Page 4 The Planning Commission also raised concerns regarding mast�ar „ !j Planning of the subject parcel with properties to the nor"�h with regard to access. However, staff has .determined that $ this would not be possible as the property located directly north of proposed. Tentative Tract 14263 continues to be retained by the Cucamonga County Water District. According to district representatives, the reservoir on this site functions as an integral part of their system and it is not anticipated that it will be eliminated. Additionally, a berm is located along the south end of the property which functions as a levee to protect,against overflows and*,access would not be possible. 8. Traffic Analysis and Generation Rates; As a result of the proposed development project, ;the Cngineer^izig Division has conducted art extensive traffic analysis of the proposed site, and found that .t'he resulting, traffic can' be appropriately accommodated as a result of future roadway Improvements. Carnelian Avenu'e,.which is a designated,seiondary arterial, is projected to have traffic levels of up to U.,,000 vehicle trips per day. A_- a result, access to Carnelian ;`S'limitad and the street will be designed ,with an ultimate r,zght-of-Way of 88 f Wit, (54 feet.k of pavement width), Additionally, to reduce potential hazards to motor,vehicles, bitycie% or pedestrians, a r'ght-turn lane will be provided for "south bound traffic and the proposed driveway aligned with uivero Street. A traffic analysis, prepared by aiRourke Engineering, indicates that due to existing traffic levels On Carnelian,, a stop light will be necessary at. the Viuero intersection to help reduce speeds and thereby reduce the number of accidents between Base Line and Foothill, .Additionally, the study concludes that, "this intersection is warranted - based .on existing conditions, not as a result of the proposed project,,' A comparative analysis of 'traffic generation rates as a result of the project for the Loan (L), Law Medium (LM)and Medium (M) land use categories was prepared by staff as shown in Exhibit HD% it was found that the traffic levels would vary slightly, with the LM designation tending to generate a greater amount of traffic (240 vtpd) than either the L (180 vtpd) or M (195 vtpd) categories. Therefore, altl-ough traffic generation rates- for different land cases will vary somewhat, the resulting traffic levels Will L be relatively, minor to comparison, with levels ,predicted along Carnelian Avenue as a whole. The street will be" designed to :carry the projected traffic load at an adequate level of sprvice which will mitigate the proposed traffic concerns, „ -'�1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' RE: GPA 89-02A,,1 DDA 87-12 - E,G.M DEVELOP I October e it s 1, s9 Page 5 C. Land Use Analysis: The prc,�osal to designate the subject property as Medium Density Res«Lnkntial rather than Low or Low Medium is consistent with the '�--'Iicies' contained in the General Plan with regard to locationai and compatibility considerations.- The General Plan states that the Low (L) and Low Medium (LM) Residential designations are intended to encourage lower intensity single family housing., , The Low Medium Density designation is described ai0 one which "encourage(s) greater housing diversity-'Without charging the single family character of the ,surroundiyng;,resi.dential character. As a result, -this designation can nti",bsed as a transitional housing type, or as a. buffer from higher intensity uses. In contrast, the Medium Density Residential des,ignation is considered.a more appropriate use "adjacent to parks and other open, spaces, along transit routes and major and secondary thoroughfares, and near activity centers, such as recreational centers, libraries, shoppipg centers, and entertainment areas." It can serve as a !offer and. can better accommodate impacts as a result of traff% and noise. .Due to the location of the proposed project adjacent to the flood control channel, with a,proposed future regional trail, ' and - Carnelian Avenue, which is a designated' secondary` arterial, a higher intensity use is more appropriate as opposed to one which would encourage a single family character. Additionally, as the project site is separated from any adjacent residential development by some form of edj or j barrier, the higher density development will not ca6z a negative impact on surrounding existing uses. IV. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ANALYSIS State law requires that the Development District; i.e;, Zoning Ordinance, be consistent'with the General Plan (Section-.66860,. Government Code), If findings; can :be made to warrant the General Plan Amendment to Podium` Density Residential, then similar i-Inding should also be made regarding the Development District Amendment charge to Medium Density Residential. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS;: In order to approve the General Plan and Development District Amendments, the Commission would have to determine that the change would prorate the land use goals and Policies of the General Plan and not be materially detrimental to the adjacent properties or, cause significant adverse environments) impacts. Following are the, findings that are necessary: ':PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: GPA 89-02A & DDA 87-12 - E.G.M. DEVcLUP. ' October,11, 1989 Page 6 i 1. The property is suitable for the use propose,+,, as it has been designated surplus by the Flood `Contr,Tl. District and will be,.,adequately protected from flovis from the north and 'east, as determined by the Engineering Division as a result of hydrologic analysis and proposed flood protection measures; and Ct L ,The site is ofl-adequate- size and shape to':meet al", development standard requirements, as .eviderc,}I by the'. design of the related development proposai;( ,;entative j Tract 14263;, and 3. The site will have adequate access to acco,,modat,+ the proposed use, based on extensive!'tra€fic-analysis by the Engineering Division and proposed IOU_Urre roadway improvements; and ` 4, The proposed use-is compatible with existing and future land uses in the area, as the proposed site is separated' from any existing residential uses by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and Carnelian Avenue to the east and west, and the existing Cucamonga County Water 13Jf .District reservoir to the north; and '•p, 5. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the General Plan, as .,evidenced by,-,the ability of the proposed la„i use' designation to sat-,t fy the stated goals, objeccives, and policies;contained in the tent; •and 1 6. The proposel amendments are in con`ormance' with the policies ar;3 ubjectives contained within the Development Code, as evid.inced by the ability of the proposed site , ' to meet development standards. However, tF,e, ,;proposed amendments may result in significant negative impacts on the ability of the Central School District to provide adequate service as evidenced by the fact that an apprapriate mitigation agreement has not been .reached between the property diner and the District..' VII. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public _ hearing; ni Te Daily Report newsy 'r,.the property posted with a supplemental large notification sign, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. t �LAW ING COMM.i ION STAFF REPORT RE: GPA 89-02A& DDA 87-12 - E.G,M DEVELOP (J) October 11, 1989 r Page 7 V:iT, R£COtit! NDATIdIY; As a result of the> potential negative impact to school services, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing a d consider all wri: .A and oral input in cons!dey_,ng_.the followj'rkg deter_m nationt: A. That the General Ptah=,--:Pd Development District,AAendmehts be : denied, based upon the, fact that no definitive mitigation measure is available to reseive the resulting impact on the Central School District, If the Commission 'favors this option, staff would recommend that the denial he "tiiithout prejudice" so that the applicant may re-apply;at a,* time if a mitigation measure or solution is found; or B. That the 'General Plan and Development District Amendments be • continued until a more definitive agreement is presented, which clarifies the, mitigation measures on the school impact issue; or. C. That the Planning ConnrsTssion determine that the potential impact as a result of the General Plan and Development District Amendments, of ;approximately 29 additional students (elementary,and high school), is.not sufficient to result in a significant impact on school services. With 'r such a. determination, the Planning Commission :can recomnend' Negative Declaration and 4hen consider approving the GPA and DOA applications, Re4du ily gsub * d, Bre City Plaf er B B;CN:ko` Attachments- Exhibit "A" Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" General,Alan Exhibit "C" Location flap Exhibit "D" Traffic Analysis Exhibit "E Proposed Site Plae Exhibit-,'F" - Letters of July 26 and August 22,, 1989 from ventral School District Exhibit hC' - Letter W July 11, 1989 from Chaff. Joint" Union High School District ,., Exhibit,: - Letter. of September 21, 1969 from Appl art Exhibf , °In School Enrolment Figures Ba sotine Ave. • rfl SubJec Property, Vivero St. AOL qp • `+per t. I '1 Vicinity a N.T.S. r , CI'TY.,OF:RANCHO CUCAMONTGA el r><-zrM; PLANNING DIVISION TME. 1 t 14 e1 mia.4 N ; MUBM A SCALE p • • ♦ ♦ �.i •y• }•• ♦••• i•r�.T i _ • •°...t♦ r .y ..: ••:�.. •1••4 a OHO • • @O ••e•e 1 Subject Golf ••�•• — his �� y • . •• •�f, *�• �• ♦ ••..J• yyt • Y • e a•••r of • • � �t, •�• ••a� �1 a � . •�e�f�•� • Y�;w...�t'.u'�"�,:�'da`x�.:.k..G4'�`„ ••t k.j • e•• e Course •• - �� • ( , I D •.•�..♦•.al•it i_ � •• .� ••••f y p 0••••• •r t p..•••°••.•f•••'• ', ........ •••' "~` •..•.°•°..°.O ••••t••• .♦ a••of•.••••• •• .tay1•.1•♦ 70. • a i a. a Yrerr0L••:el6froso, . •pree•e.V e•"- • 61! � x, ••rse•reefr•rerrr• r; a♦_t a r r r 69 O �.• • III Oe® : '• �I•i 1 • � S4; .�,.e.•••♦9 naaa of o•.•.•.ra f•.. • •• •: 11 • • •••Y•ear ••••"1.••.•.r - •••• •Of >I..: .♦i i•. •0 i!� 11 •,1 e r e r.•a •w••o e••a r,, ®. `re•re.. a•••.o1••••• - •••r••..a 9� 8�000 ®•� ��•• • ui•r•er r• 'Tel I p•.••err•a• •e••..•t b••a O••1 ' •O®•�••s @ O •10 ��;„�, e s,�r e e• e.e e s•p r•r a e �. v e s p•e••r•e• t IT Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M: PLANNING'DIVISION rmf-Aw�''��L lCYf'� FmimI— BI SALE: l \ ir L — J LJ `�7;` E 1 � 1H_.�e5i�rrd� :••AAA � L j �, Cx• }� \ L Ja 1 y;J ' Sc � V ._•. s �> rj Lj y.pa�fy LJ L j ; . us 3 ITEM:OF PLANNING'DTSION , sr �r SCALE: �t.'. EXHIBIT '0' i _=. Tratiric Genaration Anil ysi5 ti.. Staff has conducted a,'comparative analysis of the traffic generation rates for the proposed:,,project site based upon possible differing land-? use categories. The generation rates for the Law, (L)'and Low Mgdium,(LNi) categories here` based on average lot size,, Addition�lly, "staff.assumed a single family (including duplex). type of development to occur' in the Low M,,diunn, category, rather thaii a clustered d6.0.6pment I L 18 units. x 10,00* LM 24 units x .10.00* = 240 (vtpd) ...,y M , 32 un its-x 5.10*�. 19 (u pd) As can be seen, the ;Low Medium category w6uld,ten1 o generate.a greate-, amsunt of traffic Thar, eltherr-she L-or`tl cote pries.`°,,,I: ha generelIy, br en found that single family tyke developiib-is,tend to .gepe ate higher rates. of traffic due to'thie larger numbef' of. persons" pore household. however, traffic Js generally more c0.1 imntrated 'frnm. mt iti-family projects as a result of limited accF.ss pointis a * Average daily trip. generation ;obtained from the General Plan Master Environmental Assessment. I'. >, �IJ y rt ,t ti - J i' s: 48 .M 87 Lot.� .,_.,. 'Pbr. '.,ai..o. c.i mow:».— xup6 V ..,.f 3 ". ".f ' •• J a"q , ie*IaN. + fLwacr �' 7 ra.rw•.w e■�w..w ,. xis �' S iL 1 _n�I "�4 \1 KG rr • f—r' f sfi'�r �.�3 1��• ' {8 •� r xYr YN W.MMx w Y 1. G OWN lSS xx�S.,$. M».YF t V 5.5S.MS.Kt f i_�' 16 v' \ >ai�w.l+w tr•m e^ �� «+"'"`sj A wed" 1,1J • � �1..Gan »rye.• � LQ� ftss -�� ,x.., �V ` I • U1.L,Si�.q.I.nif•.da.es ...... O 14�0 4: 13 �� „ ►, t2�1laa {J c� Q s L a mo s 19 7g l6 i CITY OF -RANCHO'CUCAr ONGA TEM. PLAN ENG IDTVISIu i�T EXHIBIT: � sCakMl - TJ AbMMISTR. TrON i :t l G S i 6 ' Erwin X.Jones �� f Oprow r ?Footh l!B!vd,/Rancho Cueeihonga Cdlifarnie.91730 8541 0 Iagrsd V ek 7�y xssT„sE* .'vuSl NESS.. .SbHrg4 I..Ptag@I t l July 26, 1989 p wss"r'.suwr.,t Nsvwucr c oN. Mr. Timothy J Watkins, Project Architect Pitassi-Dalmau Architects 9627 Haven Av�nue su to 220 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 u Dear Mr, Watkins: I am in receipt of your July 26th lettellraealii;g with your planned 0 construction on the west side of Carnelian stree:t,at the intersection.', of Carneli'.n and'Vivero. You asked for answers :to Ewo'Auestions. l Question ka:. Will the Central School District acid the specific Elemexitary ' School which•sarves :this bro,3ct be, impac--ed_at the time this ps;ojec,t will be ccccipied (apptoximatel- Aug 1990)? Response: Valie Vista Elementary School serves this._srea. it is ove.rcrow ad at the 'presents,time apd,-yas, it will be impacted even further at tlzi time the proje:t i�� comp,., Question #2: tseitt upon ttte speci.fi^ information supplied concerning this .i`o jeetr..wili cur,projec z.hr,ve a sighificaht negative impact upon the district? ; Respopue; Your plans to build 92`," bedro6r;'2�-bath homes will have a : aignifican' negative imp�t .upon the district. tie wish that we could give you differ nt information, but we can't, if toy have any additional questions, let uSKnaw, Sinverely, Ate._,.__ �+/�4� Erwin N. Jcnl' 'Superintendent' n r 7#prtat to Antnnf t,8I Krt� 066 Met NWfi A stuwir,, Andrth 7avf!- .ttit �_ c:n.l Tt an.• if,..e.�i.. , 1i , ��!-- ` ADM1N1STRP T10N C en tr l School isrrlct i:r� N.ra�es SUPERINT.ENZENT 9457 Foothill Blvd.( Rancho Cucamo�`�ga;California 91730,1(713)989-8541 Ingrid Vogl ff �' ASS4.S1PrT.'susimmsB Slyason L Nage1 - -August 22, 1989 ^SST.suPT.I,INSTRUCT1oN s. Mr. Timothy J. Watkins, Project Architect t Pit.,ssi-Dalmau ARchitects 9267 Haven Avenue, Suite 220 d Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Watkins: In response to your August 14, 1489 letter, S am parvidng you with'additional information you requested concerning,the„impact of your Burgundi Creek Project upon Central School District. 4 You asked for answers to six'questions: Question &1: 'What i the current enrollment and design capacity of the affected elementary school, '(Does the design capacitj�.include portable units?) and the projected enrollment at, the projecti;,s completion? Response: The Valle Vista Elementary School is designed for 578 pupils and presently houses in excess,of 620. in a recent review, we Found no ade uace space to hous another portable,.thus, we�4+r ransfsrred pupils C'p another school to meet enrollment projections for 1989-90. Although we do have portables on thegrougds'it- is'the only elementary - school operating_without a library and a computer center due to theyC` lack of space. Question 02: What is the student .generatlon factor used by the dsscx ct to :=• determine the number of students expected from your pr6ject7 Responsa: The student generation factor used by the district is .7962 :aer unit..,. - Question i3: Will your project impact the district's ability to provide adequate service to r,-sidents? If so, ender \that conditions can the disty wt provide adequate service? Response: Yesr -- your project will further overcrowd an, already, overcrowded i. school. tie can provide adequate service if we: had additional, class-. room spars. Question a4: Does the district use, or have plans to use, portarlr_,clas:`�Ioms to handle the increased, student enrollments? Response: We 'have portable' classroo6s on every site in the school dim ric£ o. handle the ever increasing student enrollment. `1 I QQARO or YRtS5TEE5 tt5anrt 1,sto Artlnnia 1 R+,Rersj� Debbie Staler Qut(,A Mutwr -:Udri�UO.(p ^'t ��IJJ�S';'i n Mr.. Timothy J. Watkins Page Two '8/,'22/8?r, 5� 1a� Questio"n 5.' Uoes'zhe,3zs ;ict 2iave-plans -b construct' additidi�a7 scna`o� t7 facilities., and if so,, at is the projected time Frame and funning " sources? Response: We ark presently `completing the third and final phase 'of Bear Gulch School. We are currently working on.SXte applications for tkree f' . ` additional schools -- Terra Vista II to---1991r Ruth ku:-ter AiAdle"?` School. 'for 1992� and, the Coyote Canyon ,9lementary Sqb of for 199 to replace the�,teroporary school built by`;Lewis F.omes. The furdkng source is the Sfate. of California'. and im present no fu ns ase"Yvail able. Howevert,we hope to be funded. if the Voters appfove, a school :building bond issue at the next,election; l Question e6. Does the i stzic£--have a comprehensive master. plan�or 5 year 4 action '� an? Sf s$. What do they-et�taxl8 1- r „ l 10pponse: yes, W do have a comprehensive master plan and our,, yeat action plan is described'in Respoase I trust this is an adeauat. respclae to vbur,'concerns.' ,E - Sincerely., ' , Ingrid Vogel . Assistant, Superi''atendenL' 33 - - - .+} {'+ JT i ,u Chaffy Joint Union _i-9ight School, District �,WON IIp4 ,o 211 WEST FIFTH STREET,ONTARA CAI FORNIA 917,64.1 _(lt4)JN6 8911 SUPEnUNITENDENT"OF SCHOOLSASSOCIATEJ ry SUP RINTENDENT 'BOARD,MEMUERS OeLn E.Smothers .r Bode114S B.4MSC xa.hleen E.Kinlay a, t0 Bggo B.Hamstlrt Hut C Mamn j ASSISTANT SUP.ERIfST9ND5MT, Raymtlntl:41 Samtl •. PERSONNEL, Chadaq J.Unultey 'Dtlntld E..Cuh ' -��.. Gerald W Walt `; . - "`1; ,uly 11, 19F9 5 ; r Pita$s -Dalmau, Ar h.it.erts 92671Haven Ave.,, Ste. 230 'Rancho Cu,:amotlga,' CA 917M ITN: Timothy Watkins. R„r: burgundy Creek,;Tentative Ti,,xct 14M - r•'• :. The above-referenced project,, aon':s st;�g of`''32 toHnhocues, is situated in the Alta Loma High-'Schpol attendance area.. _ e „ ' The current combih6d capaciriea of Alta Loma and Zt)Liandi High Schools is 3800. Their comoizied' ,.4roc lment. i,s 46,4,0. The average is housed in trailer claL-�i46 aj s,` na.ever, the 'service facilities (cafeteria, gym, 4ggidanee and administrative offices,. parking, access, library etc.) are woefully inadequate":for, that riumber .of students.. By September, 1990, 'we v will hae".completed certain cons�Zruction projects at both schools" ' ir_creasing 'theAr:combined; capz,city tc . 4950: However, our"prosections indicate that by September, 1990, the combined enrollment's'- of the 't•wo schodls will be. 5550, We 5 tillr will have to use, trailer classYooms, an-A'the campuses still will ,be. serloaslY_,.overcrowded'. The Chaffer District has anew high school (Rancho Cucamon� High School) for. that area on the aleavin boards. 'W� have appli4 for :;fate funding, but the ,Stato Ytas'nt,•, money for '. a project, ' A State bond issue is proposed foi the, June, 1990 ballot. If it gets on the ballot and if the issue is approved. and-if the ,Chaf- fey DisttFict recc ves some of that; munejr' perhaps'`:c�I."could' 6pen Rancho. Cucamonga High School ;in 1932. Given the uncertainty of Rancho, Ciicianorga High School, the Chaffer District a wjri e'lJed to, inform you. that four project will have a sigra_ficant , ncgati�re lmpa t" up'vn he District 4:A that the Chaffey Dl:itr,;ct stzea no certu].n rz . ° cif that impactil�h coming fz:m; tt a St:at�,' :r• � MIAUL1�lHt}T FlUIVANIN—'I 11 hWAFVM Mg1111,1 :.'0lGIuu. A1110,711W�Ut SCKOOIS Al1Ai OMA `t ,. � �1 yl t While the Chaffey District dues levy •devel6Per fees pursuant to Government- Code .Sections 53080 and 65995, ' thgqse faes.fall fax, short of prodw�ln.g,.e-Aough money to build the school facilities, i,;eded in Rancho..Cuc^monsa. The District, thetefurs, will and hei�aby does '.recommend that the City either ; rr (1) Deny approval of Tentative Tract 14263, or ,4 (2)v Condition the approval of_ Tentative' Tract 141.63 upon E.G.M. Development or any` assignae's not being permitted to pull:perwits and, start construction in that tract until - after Stai:e funding for Rancho Cd amonga High School, 'is is cured ar.{d a coi'tract .a4arded for the construction of. thatAAgh school's C3) , Condition,the apprcYral`of Tentative Tract 14263- upon, E,G.M: Developments ,'participation ia: a Me1lo.Roos CummuniGy; Facilities 'Dist,rict or some o,, ems appropriate school fa i hies funding program beyond the; et,U1rIe d developer fees .le�,ed, by the District. 9'ncerel STEPTIEN L. BUTTMS Director 1� Business Services` SLBj''sb cc: Bred Buller `; 'r it - 7; y, q n T 4 a " 4J k1 .r- ♦♦ t7 - .3 i i 11H$'31 DPLMPU HPCH.H TEL r 1q-+tc14-°?' 4 n-• n r £EP 21 185 6.36 h:;; n �+ r1�r: hJ�,fi rl F C, ,.it , hE,7EL.Pl6AT r:i� rFiLaIGlr P;2 7 -I September 23., 1989 1y Mr.. Brad Buller City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning; pepa_tmert P. o. Box $07'' Rancho Cucamonga, Caittorn a 917 U-UffO7 RE Trace no. '14263 Dear Mr. Buller: This 101tter is intended to voice our concern over the "F7oloies that are being dweloped with regard to the obtaining of F7i11 set^ve letters from the Chaffey and Central.,school 'districts,, I would like to state that we have, tried to adhere to every request. .,the city has made of u. . tle have, striven"•to make our; project as high in quality and its sUbmittal package as complete an possibl(a. nur. goal is very similar :to, the city's witFi zsg;`sd to aesthetics and overall public accept(invo and appeasement. Crowding of the sehoola has evidently led to the need of a more stringent.; poliay an will S#lrve-"totters, At the request of your staff we contaathc� both districts in order to obtain infor;nation about our project,sa a3'tect on the schodis._ Thr-,?,ugh our "nmmunication .with the districts we have learner of �"' pending ` to-A10-Rode Whl,ch ias in process 'co' develop another school, Chaffey has an agreemen'c which states you either nay an ;'or .v .rQr in o than nos3ysmSnt' G$a&rir_.t• k:e"" have agraod to hbv- our approval conditioned to meet that requirement. I ,would Lhope the city C61 i1 work a similar arrwngeneni _Witra cer-t�,al school d.stric,. A project such as ours}'can not pay the school tees until we record i construction ;-9"an. Banks will, not record construction loans ;althoulL approvalfr. Thus, we get caught in`ths taiddl:e if they mush; be paid in idvance O£ tipprovals. Our "irro smt Will incur at least $eo,000.00 in school feet plum whatevar incr6ase_ the districts decide' on. A pzoJact of our ai2a normally only requires $poo�000.00 in capital Ro. YC4 cnn sbe tlhe tremendous ,_ impact which would �aaur if trio Fooa naadelt to bit paid hefare, we could c?at,ain finanhing. Yttit SC_t7HLMfiV HFlH.4 1ELr,4 r i�I-9 4 r r;}4}'4 . �...�...'.sP ;7 -7 fi, 41�' t >,t- _EP 2f ag 16'4 hk� Ce,twoomiT ortStc tr .3�3 r impZdxas the v'q.\on our riehalf,�-to well as oti,:ir s'aXl b� jlcjors, to very MUOh 161's to conditioning. approvals, ktO on th4 4}` devielop4r sntering Into an ayreem6n`,:` with the diotrjat MA-P Can rsoord. The a:Vternative ot. advanowd ,.paymont WOL1I. E� financially 'ru )i small builders„ $inoarelyj >I �C4� 8,S Surum Vice Prt,—Aident aseepd 1 iII �41'v I r W �t 1 �f i DIS7RI=- WIDE SCH06L ENECLLMENiT F-IGURJAZ; ' for combined GPA's BS-02F. & DI $TUDENTSI CURRENT CAPACITY- GPA' 89- A6-?$ TOTAL DISTRICT ENROLLMEPJ� PERMANENT �CEr M, _ 024 02C '.?2 ENROLOLf�iENTS Central 4281 2$323 ` 42633 24, 5 30 .7 1.3 Chaffey 4620 1800 4620+ 5 .09 6 .1 •2 l as generated by the anticipated ros, idertial project on the sites. of the GPA's. 2 % of current enrollment-di�4trict wide 3 fiqures from City Master EnvireslnmentR A'ss.es�ment-l9L`8 t r CITY OF RANG CUCAMONGA ' ITEM: 70PLANNING' UIV,.SION TtrLF: A EXHIBIT: SCALE. .. - - Y,0lIIAIKAIII .00T /�rAx2fIi;AND I00VM"l' "��, '- wtMracnG.btlrMutt�ow.ttlnrnrnmr+c� \ � tYAYtt1V:1 aAANFR tE�EDt+Gnfi(7tt�9T1n7x jk : StlFne„fiat bQv1AT tMr�:'T'.L�iaiHS�"�El•SatE3f2 !( tMMASITACw,951FA a wiTf?04h CAt>i`biimum U'CNHUE0 SW>. M .�i�' JC41AYkiyJ.x10TT - AfiF�.FA,E ill kNUWAD;*C p 4 4 vie XFAon.Y toter 1i, 1989 l r J� c CC-ao r, r , a, f _ Via r-42a}mile = �C lr. 11 BURGtMDY CREEK DMLOPMHT ( tt�r ' 66S7 ba21a Avonue Alta. Loma .^4,` 917fi1 '� Attn: _3of£roy Buij llm r u Re Proposed 32 Towlihomes in central unified Schcal Distrlat (rlr } Dear Mr, Auruw- This Setter is addresued to you on bahalr or ,;he CG;::ral q Schaal District regardintj the proposed develtslk,t3nt ai 92';, townhomes located ar Carnalian and Vivero straot'in the cityl`. of Rancho Ctft=raimongA. The District it,advised that you proposey�. to co»str%IO*32 units. iIstr!ct StAtV,has ,computed the torai impaction of your? Projection a Mchodls oP the-D strict based 'upon addinq ne��: project t, es V1 exlstinc j�choot ,cite&. "Tt,o total impactionl, desired by thk\DistricG is the sum of $70,444. This sum i§f estimatad to be approximately $18,60$ abovo the devoloper fee;{ collected pursuant to $fats leglslatldn.' = ;. This matter will be submAttea to the board Vt Trusteala of tho school uistr of Wcones:;ay,_October 7,8. rTha, positia;�t Of tie District Staff and the undersianEt acting fie' Attornv# for the District it, ghat if the City of Rancho Cucamonga will impose a requirement of jdyment to the district of a tote. Amount of $10t448 payabio on issuance of .building Beemito, the District will cirtity that this amount will provide school I scnplJ�PJt�nYraeat.,na,�>! -0f `. ;1;2 Q. S CCT It '89 1S,-48_P8R1' PE t COIV�FT ,ate y • f7 L Vr. Tdffr'av 8urum aotobor ix, i9a9 Pass 2` x7 C ta.oiiities far tha Centro- School' t�iskxiat which pxavid�s r' ? edttcs can,af Grado;f K th�?Ugh t:fad your,pYd:�sot. ti r�< Very truly yauta'o rK copy, ;;gnja Xatc�s� SuperintenAantir C@z�L2al ,D, J,'='- MmAzank City. kttoxna�, Rancho ouaamonga. tl , fig ,i • iehpfJkp/trCn:tattCurum.357: 5 r/ �1 e, Qf5rY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 1'S, 1989 -' TO., Chairman and Members of the Plann"ag Commission' FROM: Brad :Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL` ASSESSMENT ,AND TENTAT'IuE' TRACT 14263 DEVELOPMENT residentialsu iv, s ern a�3esign review o condominium;x`unitI on,'3.35 acres of land- in the fladium residential District (4-14. dgelling`units per ` acre) and the Flood Cogtrot„District fa proposed tdedium Residential •.District), 'located` an° tie taest` side of Carnelian at Vivero Street - AM, 207�022-'r4 and ,64. Associated with' this project is C�neral Plan Amendment 89-02A, Development Distrtict Amndment '87-12, and Tree Removal Permit 89-58. ,. '' I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re u_eess--d: Approval of the detailed site plan, grading p ,an—inn scap"e.plan, building,elekations aid the issuance of a Negative Declaration; B. Project Density: 9.55"dwelIinF,!utiit3:.Par-acre: C. Surrourd-ing Land Use and Zoning., Noun Vacant, ssinT of miry r IdentlR-1; tftdium Residential District ..(4=`8 dwel11rq't:nits,pet acre) South s Vacant;, Flood Contro Distrk" East - S'irojle, family residentiM4Y tow Residential District (g-4 dwelling units ,per aml l West - .Vacant, Cucamonga'Creek.,Chanrel; Flood Control J District D. Gentvr' -a Designations:_ j 1FeCi �T e - diium—Residential and'Flood Control (Medium Residential ,designation proposed) "r Nortlq - Nndium Residential South, F16od Control j - East Low .Residential West Flood,Contral , ` I'.5i1 K ;ij ( PLANNING 'COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tr 14263 - E.G.M. DEVELOPMENT )ctober 11, 1989 Page 2 Allk E. Site Characteristics: The northern half of the project site contains Three (3). single family residences and one. (1); detached garage. Al four (4) structures. will be demolished. The southern halt of thr, site is vacant. There are a number' of mature trees on-s itp which required the preparation of an arborist report The project site is relatively flat, sloping approximately six (6)=Percent from north to south. II. AIALYSIS: A. Background: Associated with this project, is General Plan Amendment 89-02A and Development District Amendment 87-12, both applications wsre required as the, southern half of the project site is currently designated 'Flood Control. The General Plan Amendment proposes to change the`Flood Control land use designation to Medium Residential. The Development District Amendment proposes to change the Flood Control land. use district to Medium Reside4lal :> B. General: The applicant is proposing sixteen '(16) two-story uuT Pezl units•with two (2); elevations, totaling 3,035, square feet. Unit A totals 1,420square feet and Unit 'B totals 1,615 square feet. C. Oesi_ 'an Review Committee• On September. 7, 1989, the Committee, (Blakpsliey__,,McNiel,Zi routil) reviewed the, project and recommended approval with, the following condit,,,.n. i, Remove the glass block element anti replace with standard windows. 2. Extend the pot shelf element on the right and left side elevations of Building 77ype 1. 3. A texturized' paving treatment or concrete band should be provided along the front of all garages to create a pedestrian path leading to the recreation area. D. Tree Removal : Permit 89-56: The applicant has submitted a request for the removal o twenty-five> (25) trq,es, out of a total of forty-three (43) trees., in conjunction with the development of this tract. The majority of the trees;proposed for removal are Eucalyptus sideroxl n rosea (Red Ironbark), wi)ich were planted as part of use uarneTian beautification pt jject, and are - in conflict with street right-of-Y141 -improvements along Carnelian. Their removal is ,necessary Lto obtain a deceleration . lane leading to- the project entrance. Extensive arborist studies were performed to determine the health and `condition of the exti-tirig trees, and." their suitability for preservation- in place or through transplanting. Based upon the arborist; reports, staff is PLANNING COMMISS160 S .,AFF REPV i Tr 14263 =E.G.M. +IDEVELOPMENT October,�ti-1, ing ` Page; 3 C) , recogwriend�mg that seventeen (17) trees '(mostly Red I`ronbark) be preserved in place, seventeen JW) trees be transplanted elsewhere on-site, ,and seven 1,17) trees.. be removed and replaced,' . The' City's',TreePreservation drdi'nance requires that replacement planting be of the largest nursQr'y-growrit stock avai iab-le..' R detailed listing of each tree is shown 1n0 ` Uhibit'"H" (rd'farenae numbers correspond <to the landscapes r. r� plan)•. 'Che two Lemon tr. c) a►ro<svempt; hence staff recorm>rrxis}, their removal. The applicant hai'467unteered to. preserve. the large English Walnut tree near, ihe, north property line;even though it too is exempt. E. Gated Entrance:`. The applicant originally proposed,'a; gated entrakre; esign. However, the site plan, does 'n5t ;t,eford sufficient depth toT,provide a visitor stacking and _tiurn,��round area b�eiwOen the right-of-way and 'the gate. The applicant has agreed to'delete the gate rather than revue,the site plan. F. Er.;#tronmentai Assessment: Part I of the 0-itial Study has,,, bgeii,ca�mp,leted by t e ape icaia'. Staff has completed Part II, of the Environment Checklist and has fccnd :no significant impacts on the .environment as a result, of this- t. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS The prod eat will be consistent ;iith the Genera P`f— aT—n and-Fe Oevelopment Code. The ,project, r ith the added mitigation measures', will..not be detrimental to the;\public health or safetyi or cause 'puisance cor,significant envirofimntal impacts. In addition,. the 'prcposed;use acid Site Plan, togetyer with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the applid6le provisions of the. Development Code and:City standards. Il CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been'advertised as a C.ablic hearing in the` THe�1 Re ort newspaper, tiie property posted with a supplementa�t icat.on sign, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 .feet of the project sites V. RECOMMENDATION* Staff recommends the Commission adopt the ed i a acsolution of Approval. I{ Re Ily it d, B 1e City ,' tanner BB:TG:js r r NAMING CC�NMISSLOi`'SA NAMINGP REPORTF` n TT 14'263 - .G.M. DEV-e'LOPKrIAT Qctober 11, 1989 Page: 4 Attachments- Sj Exhibit "A"� ,=6ite Utilization. Exhibit °$„ -..Si'te Plan; Exhibit "C" Tract.Map`14263 Exhibit "b° - Gradtpg.Plan Exhibit:"E" - Landscape P14n. �.,. Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations Exhibit !':G" - Floot- Plans { O:hjbit "H" - Tree Removal Legend _. Re'soliltion of Approval for TT 74263 With Sta ndard` anditons Resolution of Approval for TT 1226,3 DR with Standard Conditions a. 1e y i 113 Ld- i r 61 r, \\ Li ri r- �� LJ 1 1, cJ 4J lJ tJ LJ rn r r, LJLj _ @ .f ` 3 Bil V , 1r. J In ��` 1• �:� 1��r' Vie � a u 71 j 8 S rl _ \ ' 64 EXH I LEI 87 w.wrrwar,w 297 A Oft A— pkaw nww Y•Rp N. f./ • �639>' --9N ,Tt !i! �, : .•ass w•w t.fzae sa. �� : ' ....., © Is inw�t Won •..snopa r W.Yib y fT � r°7K rt wm.m• E � La f��s, � Ti.r Lu�aecr t1 ra.,�� i�i ` ISM ,' • u�m r '� `°`" r'+'r`ffoa ��+; IS „ 3 �.�v.+er swa•.•s U rs r< WoStAftM+c `` 13 Iso _ wIrAS $ 12 Ices 1 5 tie -76 �`` ++sr ftlaoseq � t r 7 Sao DEW LED SITE PLANBURG ....�.� U� NA aE ATTACHED -EGA DEVELOPMENT wmQcwcAwo""c&0170N 0141611.4"1 �g 11 4 9 y 8 1 8 S 9 ayya gS ai d• 5. \ '. 1�r '��• � �Z C y n LLJ LLJ S Z. C� �ffS 4 i 0 ! 11 raj s CITY OF RANC VY CAMONGA FEI�Iei: PLANNING-DIMION TmEt LIMA lSTt': I> Pwlt9em, soni To' fiz rwtrve l TOT LOT . Sr�RY STUCCO WALL aw3A� CRASH GATE .� 44 F COMP.ACTED SOL - Oe with ROLLED CURL r I- @WCANDERM WALK WROt1GIWT F N FEMING with MASONRY PIL.ASTEAS -art 2 at933 'FT G 32 U 0wam F � 03t sae MASONRY STUCCO WALL TYPICAL D EMTRY GATES META04MG WALL '�_ ° :SPECIAL rnV{tKi PEDESTRIANLilrOQ s`3: Y'Q FLOOD CONTROL TRAIL 3x PNOWE&DIRECTORY ROtMT.PO""FENCINGob .: RECREATION AREA _ _ with MASONRY PILASTER! POOLat 40'o.c. SPA -- GAF•6-0t1E AREA. i •'ft j- with W000 TRELLIS M ORTdlCRIG FOUNTAIN— I —.—COMPACTED SOF i with ROLLED CURB l \M t g. MASONRY iYUC«!� dfA CITY OF Jd () L AP1 ONGA rML MS&&— PLAN t3TSIOP 14CQ.E: EXHi'I M SCALE.�"°" t{ krr� 1 t y Get.; r,._n �� •�- J1 s � ORP+r� NS �All��i t' '•��° j +—"h-,.�` • ,�� f�`•'.•Q, cry:-:•�l"'�I ::YR �, .. r _ t �C1p X6, a ck 1 jam.: ",• r ��4•�i •i� � yam. .� a.. �v C = %� t r n ew c: ti p � •,Nth, � 11 � '� F , ,• t tr- l� 1 \,i r ;'tip n� ✓_7 - ! t AAW —$ L i s tz4 Yr^ lv f t r ° RR■Y„ '�i0� rtr■■■[ r �� rRtU■■t' ��' �. r[err■■t M Ytr■ r rr r ■. n R. ■rrr rr. rYY rr_ ■rrrjr��. 1rY (1? iall 1 ► urr t `f s .!' Ex►STING TREE LEGEND No. Name Hct t Sordid fiameier Pr 1 Rosy-red Ironbark 35, 15, 10" Remave Tieey are i1 rjj �` a(f 2 Rosy-rcd Ironbark 25' 10' 7" Rembve Jr 3 Rosy-red lronbark 25' 10, 9'r 9 4 Rosy-red lronbark• 35, 15, S. #IF 5 Rosy-red Ironbark 20' 151 6" Itemove ?F 6 Rosy-red Ironbark 10, 15, 9" 'k 7 Rosy-red lronbark 201 10` 6" it 8 Rosy-red Ironbark 25, is, 9" W. 9 Rosyc-,red Ironbark 15, S' 4" II 10 Rosy-red Ironbark 25' 151 8" 11 Rosy-red Ironbark 30' -t 12 Rosy-red.renbark 25' 15, 7" 13 Rosy-red'Ircnh,:rk; 201 10' S" vr 14 Rosy-rbd Ironbark 20' 9 15 Rosy-red lronbark 35, 20, 8" Remove' �F 16 Rosy-red Ironbark'' 30' 15, 8"' # 1:7 Rosy-red Ironbark 35, 20' 8" f 18 Rosy-red Ironbark 25, %95' 12" Remove,, X4-19 Rosy-red Ironbark 20' 10, 8" Remove` 4f 30 Rosy-red Ironbark .:J 40' 20' 10" ¢fi# 21 Rosy-red Ironbark .40' 15' 9" Remove h# 22 -Rosy-red Ironbark 35, IS' 9" Remove *# 23 Rosy-red Ironbark 40' 15' 131, Remove ,TEE 24 Rosy-red lronbark 36, is, 9" Remove 25 Rosy-red Ironbark 25' 15, 9.L Remove r4 26 Rosy-red Ironbark 30' 15' 11" Remove it# 27 Rosy-red Ironbark 351 15, ll" Remove .;gip 28 Rosy-red Ironbark. 25' 15' 10" Remove jr*29 Rosy-red Ironbark 25' 10, 9" Remove 1,'#3R Rosy-red Ironbark 20' to, 5" Remove rik 31 Rosy-red Ironbark, 3a',. :, 15t 14"- Removr *it*32 Rosy-red Ironbark, 30' Remove 33 Racy-red troN' ,.c' 35, 20' 10" Remove 34 Mexican Fan Palm 351 10' 16" Caros�ecP/o i `��+ ►a�JN, 35 Mexican Fan i Ilm 35' t0' 14"' ^ / 36 Lemon 15, 15' 9" Itemove[ � 3? Lemon 15+ 2.0' 16" Remove iffg 38 Shamel Ash 60' eS, 70" Remove >t 39 English Walnut so, 60, 22" CI6a.P rt.* 40 Eucalyptus 40' 20' 17" Remove i(+a 41 .Aah S1V2rAoff L 35r 35' 28" Remove `x 42 i1i1i ra146'1*-' 40' 45' 35" IFilt43 Si/ °i_ 30' 251 34" r Remove 11 { Based upon the arbor!,si rei)OM4 Ste.f�Fi- MMe?Ids the fbilowinp: >' Preserve it/place. #A-TranspiaK'elsewhere on-site. sY`'*-*6Relltove'tirtd repiaoe. ', RESOLUTION .113. c A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO f�AMDNGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRAC NO. 14.103 AW RELtTED TREE.REMOVAL PERMIT 89-58, FOR TtiE; DEVELOPMENT OF 32 CONDOMIRI!,, ON'3.35. ACRES OF LAW LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE bF CARNELIAN STREET AT VIVERO STREET It:- THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER: ACRE) Aft) THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (A PROPOSED ° ..EDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRI.CT), AND MAKING , FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APNt 207-022=54 AND 664. A. Recitals. (I) E.G.M. Development has filed an applicatioa for the approval of Tentative Trsct Map. No. 14263 as described in the title of this Resolution. hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject 'Tentative Tract Map request is referred to .as "tfie.Applicatian't. (i ) On the 11th of October, 198% the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duty noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (III) W,I legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have,occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resol'vr:d by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,as follows; 1.' This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, 'part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. s 24, Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 1.1 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. (a) The application applies to property i located on the west side of Carnelian Street at Vivero Street with a street frontage of 634 feet and 'lot depth of 346 feet at the north end and 115 feet at the south end, and (b) The, northern haW of` the project site is presently improved with three (3.) single family homes and ,one (1) garage, the southern half of the project site is vacant; and (c) The property to the north of the project site Contains single family homes, the property to the south is vacant, to the east are single family homes, and. to the west is the Cucamonga Creek Channel. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14263 E.G.M.,DEVELOPMENT October 11, 1989 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced public hearing and. upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2'-above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The tentative tract will be consistent.. with the General Plan, Development Code,,and specific plans; and (b) The design or improftlents of the. tentative tract~will be consistent with the General Pia►i, Development Code,;;and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not. likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat;. and (e) the tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public , health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record,: for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and 'considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act_ of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby •issues a ,Negative Declaration.. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set Earth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves site aprlication subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein,by this reference-, Planning Division: (1) The applicant shall provide for a future trail connection to the Cucamonga Creek` Channel. This shall include a pedestrian connection leading, from the project site to the west property line; however, the access point shall be gated and locked until Bach time as an agreement is made between the City,, ire Corps of Engineers, and the Flood Control District which will allow for an extension of the. regional trail system adjacent to this site, The connection shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Plenner and City Engineer, prior to the issuance of ' buil!iing ;permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. IT:14263 E.G.M. .OEVELOPMENT October 11, 1939 Page 3 2) .Landscaping along the west side of Carnelian Stet" shall conform togthe Carnelian re Street:Beautification and shall be subject to review and approval by the City Planner, and the City Engineer prior to the issuance of`bui1ding permits. (3) A final acoustical analysis sh'411 `be prepared-for,restiew'and approisl .by the City Planner,pri� to the .issuance of bµilding permstS. Should the accu3w;cal analysis recommend " the construction of a sound retar_tion" wall along, Carnelian Street, the design of the wall Shall be' approved by,'the Design Review.. Copmittee prior to the issuance of building permits. (4) Tree Removal Permit. 89--58 is approved as follows: (a) Trees Na. 3, :4, 6-14, 16,:17, 20, and ,39 shall be preserved in place. (b) Trees' No. 1, 2, 5„ 15, 19it 22-31, 33, and '40 shall be preserved by transplanting elsewhere on the site. Tree No. 1.8, 21,. '32, 36i and',41-43 sharl be_,remQved and replaced with the largest ursery grrwn_stock availab[e, as derermined by the City Planner. (d) Trees No. .34 and 35 shk A be preserved in place or transplanted elsewhere on site. (c) The lor;ation of all trees to be preserved in place and :taw locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the det-Ifled I"--scape'plans. (f) The applicant shall follow all of the drboristls tl .recommendations regarding- preservation. or transpiantirg 1 measures. (g) Those trees` required to be preserves in ,place Shall be protected in accordance with Munirip,al Code: Section 19.08.110. (€) Prior to the recordation or" the final map or the`issuance• of. building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant 'shall consent to or participate ir, the establishment of 1r,Mel16-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the pro kt site to providej in conjunction with the applicable Srhool,Distriet )`or. the construction and maintenance of. necessary school facilities. However,, if any,School; District bas previously'' established such a Community Facilities,,District, the applicant shall, in .the the alternative, consent to the annexation of the., project site into t'4 territory of such existing, Dis. "fct 'prior to the recordation.�of the •final map,or the issuance or building permits, whichever comes first. I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION. NO. TT 14263 - .G.M. DEVELOPMENT Oc.tobFj,- ', 1989 Pane 4 Further, if the affected School District has not formed a Mello; Roos:-Commualty Facilities District Within twelve.months of the diite`of appro Val'of the -project and prior to the recordation of the final.map or issuance of building permits for said project, this-condition shall be-deesrzd null''-arid-void.... Engineering Division:, (1) An jn-lieu fee as contribution `t the future undergroundi»g of the gxjsting " --overhead utilities ` (telecommunication .: .and electrical except for the 66kv electrical) cn the.opposite side of Carnelian Street shall be paid to' the City pr"-, to approval of. the Fin&',4,NMap, The fee shall be one-hrlf the City 'adopted unit amount tiwi-s the 'rength'of the project frontage. (2) The existing overhead utility°service lines .ros_;In�,�tarnelian Street shall be undergrounded*or eliinint(t6z. it (3) Street improvements ,on the west side.of Ca' fan Street nor;:h and south'"vf the 1p�Agject site shall be cons'i ied,.generally in confo,ahce with the 'preliminary traffic plan dated June 2,5, 1489,''a approved by the City Engineer. (4) Construct a right turn,packet ,north of the oroject".driveway on Carnelian Street which is eleven (11) feet wide and 230 Feet, long, fncluding the tape"r. Install a catch basin north of the right- turn pocket with sufficient' capacity to offset the 1 decreased capacity caused by the encroachment of thedriveway 1"''a the P-1sting channel. Right-of-way line shall parallel the Iinr' r.ven (7) feet behind the curb face. (5) i._. sect 6riveway shall be redesigned without a gated ent " _Either combine the , two drive eir medians . into ane ccntimous one or'delete thdm 'Provide straight curb lines on both the narth and south,edges of the<entry drive aisle. (6) Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Vivere Street and. Carnelian Street. The Ideveloper ehall receive Systems fee credit foi' seventy-five (75) percent of the cost of the signal, if approved by City Council. (7), The Carnelian Street sidewalk shall be property, line adjacent. (8) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the fufiure reconstruction of " improje_l*ts qn the west side,of Carnelian Street south from the prodert ei;trancb'to the existing curb and gutter terminus shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of buildin4"per74,t5 or Final ,Map approval, whichever occurs first, ; PLANNING C6?MISStbfitRESOt 7T 14263 EA M, o fELQPFlElT (t October Ulr Z B� Page:5 r j (S} Flood' protect measures ' shall be' provided along Carnelian Street geperaTly as recommended-in the.preliminar;; Flood Report and as, var`ifip,d by 'a rittaj. Flood 6epart 7pprnved by.,the City ar ngineer. , _ I it_sha 7,4e the developer's responsibtlityu to have the' current FIf;FS done"A asignatTc r^2maved. for the..prbject area. The ieaielaper'.s er�glreer:shy prapa4m all necessary reports; plathe ydraul}clhydrolagic ea culations, Qtc> ;pre.IfmTrary apprava°1 xhal l'§e obtained .From FEMA'prior to apnrcival of-..the record map ar iss(a�tice t building permits, ,4rhichover occurs;,first. The des9ggation,shall be offl la`ly t.'{,aveif prior•,iu occupancy or lmprovement'M eptaoce, Whitrevzr agtrs.first. 6. The Secretary` Q this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. -,. APPROVER, A" ABOPTED THIS IltH' DAY OF O TOBER, 'I"g8g, PLANNING COMISSIBN OF -THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: 46 Larry . McN e , Chairman- ATTEST: .5rdo Su I ler, Se-cretary I, Brad; Buller, Secretary of the planning Commission, of the City o€ Rancho CUMI)106iLM, do hereby certify that the foregoinq ,P11sair;tian was duly grid regularly, Antrgdur;ed, passed, and adopted by, the Planning' Cormnission of the City of Rancho Cacainonga� zit a tequ3sr meeting of.._the Alagniny Commiss on held on the 11th day of iicfober 1485, by'the followi»R;vote-to->ttit�: AYES. iOMISSIONERS: ` NOES: COMISSiONFRSz ABSENT. CO2�lISS: oiiEP.S,' •ten c c �o dc.wdy SHE LC dwVC CM.~d tYYo Cg yY L VY LY cco � o�dri.4.•+ � .o=xo Ln« o.ugq q�$ 4q'ie..r.a ', tca r+* ydn`�5 d. �a c��' Lu'ey■ c u;�r, L�'��a � W �`gqsaaoMgg�a c- .rc9$A',cu ^o 'co.�•o$ _p _c noy(t « t\ �a ^'.■Gew Y Y� OY.� v.�LN 6YN 9■ I' pp d L O u'a� GC C p.CLd $c«N3 •9 3F c2 ,131 -{oI° %dy yY �Zd7W''O �C�iV },O Cyy++N c_�� Cr Y9 la� V ,I s��q.q. 11Yrr��T .Wa.2 v CLQ aNwK�Y w6o oCt�y q, /��(. >rgCa q^�{ C4 fir. ea �YtCe®�� _., Qo Y «->O yn ��'MN - w�� 6Y^ S- �y.. IY OYp.N•j4C �1L'• qM Z qqg,, O;OI rye yyyp � ppaY C�OgQ1di'.O NC'wvvee9V w. C 60 r ylYVd •�GN QC% M��O.0.N� 9.��q Y�VNy ��QG ~9«C Y' Lqa a�°�g9 LW "yNNyy tt ppo Mecc— �{cuc�+sLdp�oYYO�a`S �.= Y 6.O O r v`d[.:y�• 6 N W y i a tl G a JC 6 i.w w. � � 3 • C O Q�N'Y Ld n U—S N aZ iVl :s pa GyE1 ��, G 9 CV tl'fyCrAC� I SNw .ayQN�O CP CU�d L p ._pa.V_��Y�•V L Us it Vw �CY_B�_Ne .9ag SO p�Qi � W q H •w.•F J �9 N !•1 0 4f1 _I Piz L. pi' Uy1. ,' O LEiww YB 3-2 ka ka au w�. �a QL�q o3 om.tr¢mGC FLC.ts ON4 0 an aLmi m�Y u� �.l pp yy rs w pp '$ �=.o yyy■ �' p, OQpr� JW �C{[�> '.. ` L!r36 L RpA�qj _ q�p ^ ®�i^• q �` : = 01 H.1�� "'. i $Yti. Y a«3.Y Z 4a'r'ug�gCs� `.4� 3Y:.Y o:r "' =vo,.: bLco, �3 Lm Yr+zzG-5 Y'^ :y vy,t�a'.s _0 V14`C yt yyn :q OIVf4N 4G,iLMn_ � 90Ni C Qo=N amo` v�+o.a w Lam aR•C ,F q $darm - o, O'W.>>r{ p!' ZC yCpM OC; �=tlCS N`µ N.GCp{y�M.CaH MQA.mCLna; eQ3 �y �V4� ~j9 •� �Oz 4.�a Y M C s q R R 0A w O.«"Oz q,q V V tl'g. 9�QS 9 ^4 NYs+'w.A 'pyaRwwY�6 .vM �00:. =i O UC = y 71}V V Yew w� ,� L. N�.qg cyJV Z C .gyp �N Q 24 d .upxa��vrw '.CL R CN 01.. �L VZ'Q yVy Yy' >�•M yVp{ 'V LB- VpLp_+Mq qN: ;4GS;4 6� /fitt C 6Q Cam. O41 w.aJ L Ol'8i y- O A p6L+pp �Ofn �iy{OYV > Leyy C+ G1.7 L _"V..m:ggM C 9a+6� L{V'.NV V= N MNL HgV i�Mv�iVM:�Y� W.jj=I O'Z aV�dA t�'fd ' �+ ci RroYy 5� S+':� ga.q. N•=•e R'. <»wA.c9 �4' n+uemw uAL� .4V.'� a� •- � Xy m i a`"sw5'cq q'ryu e 'roV qy$�eL' _,ti p� ytl4R a3faAs w,vR��q owq�1m5 �a ♦iL'.u'v�o twp } a ^mq Ru V =;"q w M.3 g3f L Cty My C sCo N c pLL w 6' 1N M yy$9 �OW� .5 e w� It� , $ ewv- �pw� gee _A bsV M Ss ,O qC 4YYYYYYCC�� M 4�6u Vq ,V �M �Z VV �� Cr. ;�q.��w y4V AY1YYKKKV..G� iSL q®fig G g ae p>.. _ug®gip L q tl Sw~ t A ` S M J'`Cq _�•q«qr,w 6 C 4. . x yy • n ^powr±^.,�sa ry El' as°`S b lYYii :� Y I.9 � LW$Y :✓pKM .� Vi� �wwNLr�y��V. n • $: aW�V'w9y> '.r. syw thr S� �it�y9 wp wy. OVp.y . $g RD.IgA .:,U4C .G.s rY � 3w �i qYg Dy bE::tµ a3Oi 48la : 4: �,is . �'lv a ,.rY• �' rd` rs .... c�ov'w��'ays M Lo« L O. w N K_O y G Y fl.q O'C 6 y�.L a Q �� ■9 Y L vN{ �1ta U�a1Y1 y:N C Y S A C w w c. cn'+p.L YYN qL N~G p 4q uW r•,�c 'q'9V{�c yvgi —M v N^q.� a YC .r+: O qY �YN4py fN�gaVN�C Qw y6yi•O ■Z V4Y� `N ppO L GO. Y$q tyY-Z N w Q q U O�.p ti N O R a.dl yp�{{ OI Vo p N GNC uu� cu ta 9CVG N M� yO rO.. N'.LL'c G..UYwY L.. Cyj¢ ^ NGtl4 �. tl p•n� Y is f N'4 S�^ SON L�.'L "aq»V q.a GNV L N VL yNY qYZZ yy yO`,� VU� gWL�OOV�6 C.a�i'O ay NO 9CV L..Oc G®0 Y'Vp gt�L'NYS .& d�i 0 g V L Y ` O:j q L N N.VyY.U C Lr.'►y C V NLW C M..I yq`q Y.Op ,�N{MNL t_AN pi Y.y ,0 Y L O L O ^6yyT yY»L. • N Cy pY6 „E U�pqp K;N 4pi^COC�gCtgg�l AMq pt � Lq L�01 Yadgd CyN 4- cY CU Y. MY �OL WYCU N�N4N 4:N•� .1CN 9-NO IL^NC KN�w.�tTa wAM00 �K:R� t1 6Y. ILLOg6N •� y y C^ �•Yq Nit r_ Y y�.r O•�O= CC OtOq O+AC GM A pG�� •Y_1Q ww Cam•■ •l LY i tY Egs s p b pt Y h p all 9— oz— Vo. IL a SO �.:y Yq AqO:. G~ } e• A»44Y ayRC 99N I A! Y y2__ ^. M VI` R z. p 4NS p C K +A G 4 ��• 6 sCC� V Y.N p Y N Y~ 9 P p ppa • i a tttyy� Y N.Gtl� N L eq.Bm O �q.~#�y 'pIZ LAY N .9 Ell MNj[RZ Y N �YBa.. M» aan� 4p�pN Ci�' 6u • '.P ...{i 49. ~f� tpMP� c�.� 1t0 N L q1 C E.epw y L��i' iM[LQ�yp! Eq y��a� &y_� It '4yyN�•� -,a Cp ,® ►e Z p c6-� ygvy�.: I»Ou 4 Y N^N 4 w. '.Y v 47Nypt ' ;E 06w i1�e1 C ♦Y��L yq. -tic y Aa a ®� i5 ,tz's. c F W p�"o gpC0./A 6 M yp,C�i, �d� •^~. ®:Y qU tl y�g G Cl y®y'gyG(+61$G$( '1.Y a Tw '�O•b■G Y]C�+ pN V O O. C 6 w Y 01 SOLO t! Q O _$ �44 yVy,� 7A� �aaU GNV'� w QNyy Oea.: �yCY ��0.�.. ^�p =GJO� O.YY.N ape. ^ hiG 6 . ca� mom'.'.. ;.4Y 9Npv., ��o:..:� �juV. �i ± w pa^-�. 42 pew a'G"$$� m ^'•� Ga V w 43y. Vl�f CNd aGaw gr-0 W UO q•4 MMt�� ~ UG A mC y Cx_> UOw 2 Y. 4 ,C bRq� o S ' LYO' tYOC Rti tpC�V. 9GL «Cp U�.. G µCCy^qL v wa fR y G.i tcw MGO 4OY Y.ti�M MV cep =1EU� �Cp6..� (■An■y O VMUfj Y. ;_:�LSGK^ .Y U. C o�. �UL �CW d�LL YU� .O� 6�4A �y�QyG OUGO R =7 , ^C6- »G'r 6U Yf..,9 V �N "Fi' ^r•,�q0iaC "•a N�a '. �C�A{aY r �` �.. V pLN� YU GC O G ssN L `O ray `� � a+��.G• � rl i 99»U q^ y '^� : �.ie wCu aC6Cp_ M.LO .V O» V O-1y LZE �. NEs E-� d �tl8 OVGNU SAY. V Y L �Y0 tt3 q Oywp dLVOI aU aw> < - 6pfL1w w>LA~ L"�C Y w LQ NAOi'J _NY 6 G Cfa4i r�yM '��c ��0 :9 V pV^ �m'v w �La:i i``d'b'o'iu1-�.`Pow:`p a N5'vn - �_ d N l0 fw p p •' N. � � i.• ti I t1 1 c a o„...I"o'�' wri rd+L L p opopop y g,$ 7 t «$c u S yV LCGCC • d� w V `.�i u Y�O JY.0 Iz o C Y O V 5 '.: c�� a »� pi°o ' �.a+ aka aatt ¢$a p wwwp C W y C _N R q 8 -82 � w ZL w Y 9 Sy Hy d0s1gY. `rV.` •.. G� G� 2. ".go GG QW. Vo pi I�-a 'cL(�i Gi^4'V » SC'. C L C._ '.•,.� W$ �-SON ■6O 6/' � s-y1O V ,G .. —:l 4Ra ��++� -YM � -.K,y ww h b yw C. cNNy�p�� ylL Na N,• •;� L 0 �w M d w O®O � ga z � 4 w C G w Y d C b{�j �r�•L 'C Awwlll VsM>N `a� w U q ®yM> 4m OG�N.. OOy� tly} ',}�G�6pV y W G��Nyi�' �`0-0 a. is $ V a� N ii _ �wSA` g tlN �' 'L ,' ¢ $dyg " 5"> o^ XE a ' a. .p! �yn w o o�ir� o .� '�'a_ {Y��• 8 $ .q a W NyNrW' 1 VM a yMy p G. F Np vL�.' VKiY N C wMb qw•. 6 y 13m-RC CwP L w mM gy g w N ti �a C Y 4C L Y � �V O�b �it w uy i• � O � C V N.G o � c �• �i`G a CV 0�� Lwri q �.. �� y V M. H �� N y d wa,w't3 NA CC= t•`Y'�-.' Cj i. r `4 mo' uN� Nit C� G cc y.Nw H�HMCw r•µw ,..�� o�y .. a��y Lu.. a4 N T W C No S 9 Ul 'gam `i 4 aNGWT'm( a fi 4 l•Ov4 L q ®�Yw. 9Eb �.. Aye^ «OYV G Rf C q4 a Y..D YM q ■ W b b4 �4r G� N 7 CQ l Lb Q4Y V C^V N Lq VCwiGy� YC `vgra a�G`�c Mqc` M4 so S r 34NN C �� i� .ape .4.v �� r o Y $ ac�r� e�ao:'ge' ^o a��• ". Yro. $ q q°Nr3+Y vu C� �Cyp CQOCW y{G1Y y. � e qC L 5y�y ... pyy� Gyj yV 9 Ggy�3Y tLm� KOY V06i..4 Q C :.Y Y^M.. yrO 'u YtG 4C1n ��L� 4N •�. CC :G Ow p4 LN O..f. pM On�O4 y� A'e W Y Wu -a� acq�oYY+pu L;t � aLv .yc+�� o.4e a� H � y a� �•. t F � L 6 G Y Vq -u �YsF A L p Y Ci AYCsV Y M 111C V.•4„wN y 4 Y Al M y:�iOF NQY••. $ O 4GMO b •w•.,p6/M.G i¢� �: �M LO.# �LV'..4�� by�.$Q'+CQ -9. r dr. m Y N {� V Y•• �e —az. 1 E � 3 :s i p In $$ ^g� '`J "i •4ab �Q"® � e�� erV.9M. G� oMb ;w N a Yp` R N.`4 It-?604 ft isgs 2Z lass AH.�`• ` M ..'F� fQs'O .• p y. OI� O V`��'yP� q. O 9000 O�u4 Gd 4yi�ia Vy e.. Yr YY ~ q ��qC rt ppN W yYYY y� _-3LyN��iO �4N. N L Fp 1(Y��yy �Gry N•. tl q�•. MV Q g r. a A d L" O L a��Q .� G ��..0 4 u Y i� d • M d N� •,•w G{a{pp fs O'd hhd..GG W Y — C YO L 9C G N rLo G SV f 6pf L y� 6y6y �/ _ GG yy yy .. OdO 6t L.p� N hL.,yaN Y O Q O wA Y �M eb ,C`v� NCVvr�L4s'« r -q ou G $to as a y 4 l p6 CLai q �y Y V_ 7327 �•.O G C ..d NWYY�L.Lj Y C». Ll y T OI. ev.:u i�� e:'�,t w� ��°�'�o � my •�. a, � ' oi'�i vow � yeas �"�v » ti Lw'rT,.' ueC A C ZI N L L6 G{{1�„ ®pGd 3}i�� t ffi— tl dam » t y L L N O O R�O L. CLpGTL Yp 8f pM Y'r■Yngg. aiq TT Y1 r0 ' 4 q ry.N� O �t CGY My•J$ H. SL ' �v uq.•p e4 rd Nc a'.'AL �,;u� yo uaa... gCIS Ca, ,VCG�C N N Y Y� ywCyw tYu GG/ 'l�1�pyWG �. C(Y,1V i.r 'YM G.4.M d! ONu N� iIM NY�dr?.A xyNy Yw Cd�� IzwC 4 6 C LW®. •S•{ft 2 Y y e L'q Cm O w, r•V K 'i � `d 1GNu t « w ` d :ti w •.r r •y N Pl wi •" 4f y. •M r N �! f 1lf mta Ity ` $$ co Aes W MO Q4Y =M.L mytyNo.. rJ na � �, ��. P J spew yo �' N�o�Q,Gw�...T,.• q �• Q"�YYp e^. C •0 O.^a.. g4s �Cj 6+�•: NVM a- rL 9% CL ' YI SL YY LY JOa WM N6 yy�a 3 {� '. G� Mwd. G N O li L' T ✓L M C�M �T_,e.��.... 4 M a} mgq N iY — �„=y 3'� �0 ✓ O "" b_. ` All Jtl0 6Y~i No 8 t�q L,}Q�w w b r 'Pe 1.6 IN wr eS <}w pw h .7 3 5 o§ Hu Zb� o' o� aZa Y� _oa, a+ u t o Y:E j x if L� Yvad 6./ is ka go V M \Y r O app OYY '� Gyuy �p..N tt4 Vf n ' O CAO« • MC,G '� L"HM C M fj C Aa YY �,Y4 v:my. �Vy$p64. OO.V 4- CCWN r' ,per a C•L�� Ci y'L� ,O N. YV �� 3� `6 �"�e i it � �� OV•�� L� v� Ms vNr �� a`w • r 9 $ o v`a ".� 't'"26r,C� as�'�2i a �g� � „ �w a .W�. '•^•� .i". ~Y« o F 4• jMp�_��C � VV�i� ! y. tl i 'ice ST C1 : V`.:. y� Li �'.s sq^. ep`u O bNY _. �.:` 'a� �'+uav NB:' Ma¢� .p.�5� qiY� «•: wf��`6 > p1666� q �a�� p� �L On 9��y �i_Y ~p�ri,�N•a ��fY f.� 9`.�� M y� �Ll `,Ygw^Yr YYiG ��C EMS �N� 0r'wyy Y � -Zf ..il o P RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF`RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING; DESIGN REVIEW FOB TENTATIVE TRACT NO.: 14263 1At DEVELOPMENT OF :32 CONDOMINIUM'UNITS ON 3.35 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET, AT'VIVERO STREET IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (A- PROPOSED MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:' 207-022-54 AM 64. A. Recitals. (i) E.G.M. Development s filed an appliciiion for the%pproval of Development Review No: 14263 a described in the tit.,e of this Resolution. Hereinafter in thiF Reso elop lution, the subject Devment Review request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 11th of\`October, 1989 the Planning; Commission of the City �af=°ancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded. said meeting on that date. (III) All legal prerequisites to the adoption ,of this Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE,, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamongaas follows; 1 ' This ;Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fates set forth iG.'the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct,' 2. Based upon substartiai evidence presented to this, Commission during the abo i referenced meeting on October 11, 1989u including'written and oral staff rep,-ts,. this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows; (a) The application applies to property located on the.-west side of Carnelian Street at Vivero ,Street with a street frontage=of 634iek and, lot depth of 346i feet at the north end and 115 feet at the soot,°vend; and (b)' The northern half of the project site is presently inp ved with three (3) single family hones and one (1) garage, the ,southern ha`Tf of the project site.is vacant; and. (c) The 'property to the north of the project site contains single family homes, the property to the south is vacant, to the east are single family homes and to the'west is the Cucamonga Creek' Channel. a `' Pl AM!s,VG CQ'iMTSSIOM kESOUJTION NO, TT 14263 DR - E.GM. DEVELOPMENT October 11, 1989 Page 2 I. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon'the specific findings of facts set forth >i'a paragraphs 1 and 2 abov% this Commission hereby finds .and concludes a:f'follows: (i}) That the proposed pro3ect will be consistent with the objectives of tJ,re 'General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use will he in accord with theirzb.iective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and i (c) Tk at the.,proposed use is in compliance wit), each of the applicable provisions of the Development'Code; and (d) That. the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicnijy. 4.- This,,Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration, 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in .paragraphs 1, 2 3, and 4 above, thislComnission hereby approves thdJii tica�ion subject to each and every condition set forth below: and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, (1)" All q nditions of approval for Tentative Tract 14263 shall apply. (2) The glass block element 'shall be removed and replaced with standard windows. �t (3) Th4lot shelf element on the right and left side elevations of Building Type 1 shall be extended. u (4)--=A texturiaed , iog treatment or concrete band shall be provided along the front of all garages to create a pedestrian path leading, to the recreation area. (5) landscape islands shall be provided 'between all garaga doors. (6) Security gate 'access Ua the project shall be delete8 due to lack of adequate stacki�ig distance. D , PLANNING-Cb IMISSXON RESOWTION, NO., TT 14263 UR,- E.G.M. OEVELO NENT October 11, 1989 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption, of this Resolution. APPROVED AND .ADOPTED THIS UTH DAY OF OCTOBER 1989. PLANNING COMISSION'OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAOMA BY: Larry .. Rffiel,y 5airman ATTEST: Brad Bule-, Secretary I, Brad fuller, Secretary of the Planning, Commission of the' City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, -passed S ind adopted b,!,' the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a.regular meetik,of the Planning Commission held on, the 11th day; of October, 1989, by'the fol1&i��qte-to-wit. AYES; Ct'9NISSIONERSt` °( NOES: CWMISSIONERS: + ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS. �r i a �. � .S�Fg��EwYO~M�Y' go H �-.t.+ jlpp '+�is��i n.. C w CM tM . aao+uc^�o!`a: F .4 Y y Vg 4 ti`a.0 O ,�O W � p r. i10.,��0 �+Y qu..yp�.C�q q.�A6Ne�rdw�uf8 NeC`�ry M.Na O� yp4 aYV�i NN' '�`r Q 4 .i 4+GG 1w4O � I.00a IlM Kq.sY KQ+ QY.fiV /� UA G E it V-g a a qir CUM" u a." ao N �i *a � ;tea � .:'.i- C2P i j P_ ^ r � y slow " Zgv a>'bl`c.�. aa:" Lr. v u d IU.. u j�tiu' =2bz Z'z n o1 ao ram,s� s g`wgGf.Mo aq L^m 4 2 (��y. $s' 9 pY N N D0.N LL�N67: p� U6 b� .. AVVO V4 WYy % Q _apLN Y N,3tlw YY. _■ ��cc yq� ��JJ. Y o L a .O ND •'�a�4 OGG_NOyp �O !«a�j QQqQQ. �LN �-.0 4oanS p=`OaAa9 Cuy ��}g�gap}O C�4wY w N a {id T1t RA. $ 6 u `N'P F rs.a 7t 1nu�Y a3 u S GOa� �J LNvo a.py vy. p. NNm y S' d _c R 'cTY me X. ► 9 a N N _qq tL yy M _ ^q_'� �W O C a a'��41'Q aK O S a r � •� yy O L y GY yy LN1fr8Vr+ y'�1Y VbF psNM.Q{� 13 ba V O N y■ A N 9✓O G 1` L^„ L�.,. �y1 .V O u: �oa �Ge�$ N`uNa�. w voi �rrv$ S a29 Z e� �O$Y y�QOV �9«�4C{ S✓Q� �N.N•''a0y�� a_wV Y. G i� ?.y,X{pJ y9p. �G Shy►. I G aC YN A NYY Cw L j` w.3MN^^.v O1Y ®O g�T84 T lJ YwrLT to ?11 VO'wi��. O '4YL p,p L..G�� YAYanGO NN U L OlG it L 4 O: �� Rz 1oouGw,yyn�s�sispv}(($O' .. ay.®�Ld�o� `'u®�a� �p1COu w�W ,.aa�� •GL'.� fQ�M6� "OFNYYw...W�N.T�1L�yI�i161 S3:: m .S Y"NNbY�� Ww��f: OG 66p� 1G .. COS <a✓-C.l+g .✓ ✓YGYM WOAL< �✓a 8u� ^_ �yg6G�o"a::$«n5 i�5y� ow$uon ;o^4a1'� Qu tOyU p ,1� L OYms- YVN LO I.�G Y qY our3 ap$: 44a a ,-+i{app K '•� u •�y� �,.� r. � q y s C G0 w:i. v A N L L ^�yNy f. 32, A -1 YO Kp�j YLY ✓ $4 Q Y > q..L S A 'A^N V M V ^P. Al d •- "yy..> 41 2iE ash Aw :z$q _j,c_ w� .s11;^S, ��sTrtAY tra^TG`, Pr _4 .a � ✓, ,.. nw .q Jrt wa. ® y ` ` � gstzvy N Yet FL r.S N^ g' :e��'§yy Lie L1 YL �M^e' Qg A N" O�✓� y� a {�q LE YF r6J r ., Yw aia @.' "F O:w✓ �G Lta.p .� f.�. ✓ V�w 6'•p Ertl blJ y-t.v49��s'��>� ✓��t$ ✓^�m401Y i 12 Elie W ✓rri yq :F! FS11311,1111v®$ ipyt m^-"C.^J itr4, a1 ^ pww ^" yC� N i p i Y' .6000 yq0 Cq 0;� qV D�GOYw4h Y L"qM .�sY]�Y C LpY,tly G 4 G grOi�Y zE eu u=��++:�vcwa�'d w.yN gjw.. coSo z Y Y C Yq'r a. QQQc```L u!' �t4pLu v'�a. aG w�N d ;c uN� G 3L C W V. 9M01 ^ YV.aq OOCOOO.A^ �.AMON C` L_NYq d _ N y a P40.y. qd ~OL Q^� D.L NO Uy�i.�L.dN MpC L.S'Ll'W' MC q"ONCO Nk �NC6' a'� >.A.ggvru CCovY'is. �Gpe aE.qp.�y ~}G+ e p p'2 O.Gw �!t ta•emW wr wT.� u°fLc. Y �uGT7 mN.L ICY aneGL s S:e^� mEF- 1QMi�5 aq�u�yNq l�� °Yr �v'1N^v V YCI. LY. •. N �N 1!4 + YNCldy Nyp.Cc' i-`."64pN =VW w�.��`n O � B zl~ -it YC� gL�.L�011a6 C�wL^OCQ YI L+w'� /'� gV! IIy�6 pN `�i Q�l wwy WL TI�3 bGb G.��C~�x O 01N"NgM 0. L liu. '2 NtY�C R^V ^OCN 6.1a� . L yAy Yyd NL �■ C:MU N am, �Lr N"V'gOE EyO �~� C tl� ]gy�CM�L •V_N 9 �J C Q N 41} C ►~ yC.�y^5p L LNL 4' ®ML. /V MNy Y� f��(Ly�Y1r� fi y�yyO is� fi �C dOO:�C o �'VT S i.Y 4rSC6M au - datl� C yya yyc L - Yd a C ■ G Is!Y�y d q�� N% - as TAR to yfV 6 L 4 y" M,q pG mp. �i.1�p' � a�'. e,esi s� q inv�... i �Q}g�Q 1'��a�^s�Qaa �„ga �ttl :W µCS, p" W g � L.S N�ptl.'�C.3 ,.qNA NN0. V O dV app C 9 d �T �,:�= Had 0 & e—.Coe � BgMY.P� .6W i OWTi +MG.OM VIMM '. F �O 1\r C r N e0 Y wi N �- ��s sin e;SrY �'�yky' � ,7�+ ri�c•w erH�d �� IN VA44� v�N 582=� YTu n CL YmN. aan a4aw. X...n_ Nu a we `am c� ';I car �$d eCCGO}; Mpn,aq m«c 4� tb.p.N r a tt' AQy IleIa-yy MeV y�L C�t�i= OqVG Vd 4. tC $a ,.F aQal, 5M3'.. 52. R. S�F�ivC yO� aALV. Nitp)":@LO ,� iul[ YV ,jyD ~M OCpI�,q ...� 1T ^ M4e� bay'r7'eSG .N ~ KV °'�tlY A w .� gY 1.�— c N.Yj� ..�°„` £i wg y tr� y��}$`,sd '"F p¢yr uV c 1u Et cYj jy$$�f�e.E• x .�c;¢n ."` -� c HuRr HnH'r=' iyy+`N y � Y Sq -coo lR EQ l! WV b Cp N�ijrK�ae44 uyyi �O �`�' i! Adti�. atw.Y MG.�Vw pp gg L4Q SV �q8. C`a w M f'.N. L.�SI w`"�4Y w s WCGbyu NYVR .Y •O w �wNc�.aa per.. a. ui 15 RN4�Q uu 4 4+u., rrX .N xMQ MLN /{Id Y.tA 4C OY M y . .a MHVA p$ AL SLS Qma a Y..ayV e µpa 7� 4y g u �+. OC<p V } �eVi �s.C11 CdiO� �y� q�. .. uN NLK ,quo° 21 ��." ¢ey+3�Qny a ,sss agyg.o yaak Vd a > s m -Giwq ■ I 4 � y0. Gq 9. $ Gy f _ wry' Et m+�+�Lpp� woo. L$CSC y �"t "g� s ' °`ve L'ntov w.wy.► _rO��`�..� � y P9w. tli'��y � ��K.��y..gY6 M.�Ct i�i �}wj �IIQ i•1� .�� Cw� � ~y4 '.�. ass q 'at u,N c r ;yp; up •_ sgu-tj yp' =pS dga FT vldKY k " S O O O q�a d S O:• ,pY 1 p � M O C 4 • � a�q�L M 11 ~ NO y W O'C r •diM sRQO> L 4 � G... �s�A g� 67• � y Lq Yr(u�QQL L � �i AnC CC>.w�O� Y~A LYI•• � (V1 � «G�N N LN. ro Q� p�oMw'igf q=e��y.• `"' oG^... rJ q.�aL ,v� O N" L LF O Pi.�� O.b YCY (p.. 4t T! O�4 s•� +1'� CC�.Ay wy a CV yy■op Y N�• V i"i1:G� Y•�Y C� O N '� S 'p' 4 `L E OD .._ iYg'o.Y.mb aY^..La . Y'a' G q~�'Y' •'•� C. rZIT pp 8„= ay4 �w O q w�Ypp.g G b N1 Y'M c N ��N W� y V d Pi' .Ylt 9 4 6' 1Lif D a m+ QVI a-N yN IYAn : Y �1:�K B E by /O 9EY s+p 1. uC qy p! OSggf L. �..lYf."aC wy :«�r7• C C�• Y M � V Oq L.�. `ouc�i.o >>v raA1..a Y.P CV4® to 9 4•rC� 4O.., L4 �9 QQC� Yyq'q� yG yp `� 'O Y a 00�•W O`• t+N. 40JC yN K$6�G OL.A _Sa A W a v $o; o £�Y.i oo $ gcw "i$� u$oGv." c .3 Di �ie+$E p Y L � VY^ p+Y {ggi YQEY�+$�h i q YO OI _ �� ` o EB B T cm E y m®�Or CCO p O�. 0 S to q �6s • pMV � M�Sj GYM_ ' t.$ T. sg3:q�r' 4(6° ■y �'i ��o� cy°�w«°"g $M � _ aa$GGO Mt La.. �y�. y�w N't«�Y O0 " �+ Mug v qq Yp pp pp® y� g a� as`.f f.T G if $N c e 3C go$ wa L �'neJ W- n vtR.. $. p e`o3B$ --- .� a yr3 r � OYOS « M y 3 CC y Y bt6« NC+g4 .tl. Csa ..;� c:o L��+ 'i�Cm IIS. o 3cs. o� � in $'�Qu ^� L9 aro.°Jc oYpa'� L1G�p .Ce4N � i�L 6 TdV��Y .♦�� 4a+ �.9r af. ; i�� uq�1 QV COL «L 44 -? O�y �•Ml �d"�0 OLLV C L CS 2f 0 Ta'y O L 6iY �y $� ,vyca •-,� P N � :ohm ,, CwT.qq $_' Nnf ty VL L.. N,e VptO«$G NC M4 �L Y 4 V uLa� ydL (\V NVGC - MCN y CT Cti_ Nw W J LV.4�S yY qw 4e. Y e a—h N '• W yLLM b4 L V NY �9 «w yY ryya=A yNy L Q M L L`. Q.0 " )N •L �G L7 O� WV Nees Y4 ci S a u tl u Y O. F b u $c V. A Eta a t A.. �—r o "do qt 3 9s do I ;-a w9.�i orc wso —21 LG. dA' �pN. �Vq .C. 44d�ww 4o ° 753 .fi gp egg rcka gN LC �� C Y y O pYggq L 55 a o LIZ lr'. Y5 �•y{ a LA y� y O W L Y p Y y O«� u a CC. u3y ppy S <0II 20'M C-4 C C i N 4 L E�.. Y C ® pH p > GMRj. c p w P� v';j Y-_~ �'��, yUY ?. Z-v IVgp� $iY yT� y p�W �O pY.0 p� g� p n y0 6 V iz �`p N Y p Y p N ggY w� Y C C � M M L Y iO • Lys N p Df i oil M C C U$Y Jm q 3 M -�' -C ► M RI O p .Q O ryV M M� gppprw. tltl� yyR• p>y yB« gp Ngdqll Cu A7 � 96�p�-.. p M C C Y, L L - St^ :� `� d� L V r� 6 {Y, iNMS�, �6W®�: B1 Mwa4 K.Y � 0� {�i1 p �a W CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMOM%A STAFF REPORT DATE: October 11, 1989 TO: Chairman a.nd Hembers of the Pianaing'C60,fiiss'ion- F,tOM: Brad Bulb'_ir, City Planner BY: Vince Bertoni, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89=22 - GE2VETT - An. appeal of the City Planner's decision to deny, a' request for a carpoirt addition to an existing automotive repair shop at 8517 Grove Avenue - APN. 201-220-05 { I. ABSTRACT: The applicants, Howard and ; Yolanda Geivett, are appea'?ng staff's denial for an illegal and non-conforming carport addition;to the north,side of their existing automotive repair shop located on the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and Arrow Highway. 11, BACKGROUND: In 1987, the owners..of the automotive shop submitted an application for a Minor'' Development Review fora carport addition. At that time, the Cit 's requirements for setbacks and on-site parking were provided'to the applicant in a letter dated September 16, 1987 (see Exhibit "'A")a In addition, the applicant was informed that the existing garage facility was non-conforming in nature. - During the review of this previous Minor Development Review, staff suggested ways that the,-applicant could modify: his proposal.-tc be- consistent with-required"setbactca. 'The width of the carport could have been reduced from 24 feet to'19 feet and meet the setback requirements from Arrow. The applicant chose not to 'modify his proposal and did not pursue the application further. The applicant proceeded to construct the carport addition without Planning approval's and without building permits. This applitlation for a Minor Development Review is the result of,Code enforcement action against the property- owner for illegally erecting the carport. On June 13, 1989, the property owner filed a new application for Minor Development Review 8942 (see Exhibits "E" and "F"). Again, l staff notified the applicant that the carport itself did_ not meet Code requirements and that. the property, as a whole, did' not meet. Code requirements for landscaping, parking, and public improvements (see Exhibit "B"). City policy has been to require properties to I, be upgraded to current development standards as a condition of-an Y IM L PLANNING COMMISSION STAG REPORT RE: MDR 89=22 --GEIVE;TT ; October ll, 1989 Page 2: development application. The Development Code allows the .City Planner to establish, through the conditions, a phasing pin';for. on-site improvements, The City Planner met ;with the applidanti`to discuss the City's requirements, at Which point the applicant indicated. they desired action on their proposal as submitted. III. ANALYSIS. The carport structure is 11 feet by "_24, feet .and .is located 40 feet from the face of the curb of Arrow'Highway'and 5 ::eez from the easterly property Iine4.;,., The, property is currently zoned General Commercial with an existing residential development directly to the east. Minor Development,Review 8942 was denied by tl�e:City Planner on September 8, 198,9 (see exhibit "C") for the following reasons: A. Arrow Highway, is a 'des,Ignated Special Boulevard with a 45-foot building setbad.4, from the ultimate curb face. The proposed carport addition encroaches 5 feet into'-tihe. setback. Commercial structures must observe a rear Property line setback of 20 feet when a structure: is adjacent to existing or planned rezident'ial developments, 'The addition is 1oGuted 5 feet from the rear property line. B. -Currently,, the on,-site parking is inadequate and must be revised to meet current standards. City; standards require parking should.be.. provided at a rate of 1 space for every 400 Square feet of ,gross -floor area, with ind•iv;idual .stalls which must. be 9 feet by 19 feet in size and :double striped. , The building area totals. 6,100 I, square feet, which would require 15' parking spaces. __._. There arer 13 stalls existing that-a,a -single=sty, C. All areas for' storage or maintenance of equipment and vehicles must be completely screened':from view. The existing storage area, located at the southeast portion of the site, is visible to the south from Grove Avenue and -Ninth Street._ Commission policy is to require solid masonry screen walls for screening. D. The City's Develo,Went Code requires street frontage landscaping, which is 45 feet in average depth for Arrow Highway and 35 feet along Grove Avenue as measured from. f the ultimate curb face. The site has no landscaping 4 along hhe street frontages. The landscaping must include - combination of undulating; mounds, with 'trees, groundcover, and shrubs W screen parking, aieas. PLANNLN& COMMIS STAFF`REPORT. RE: MO'R 89-22 - GEIVETT OctobeVII, 1989. Page 3`,,= t . Further, if the' ro'ect were tobe ap roved 'Ordinance No . 58 would re uire dedication and off-site public improvements to e- buiat see Exhibit' "8." , These fmpruvements.would include, but not, be limited` to, curb and gutter- where dl^iveWays are relocated, sidewalk, street lights, and street trees: The applicant is now appealing City Planner decision of denial., (see Exhibit "C') In order to uphtrld the appeal an8 approve th�, carport addition, the planning Commission would have to apprpvti.) multiple. variances as descr,4ked above.' The' applicants have indicated in a letter dated ,ember 15,E 1985,,(sea Exhibit "D") that they would be wiili"ngto-p"ruvide, the screening for the storage r area and landscaping for the current open dirt areas on the, property. -NON-CONFORMITY ISSUES: As, described above„ the property and structures thereon are non-,'"onforming; hence, the provisions of Development Code Section 17.02.130 govern. The .nori�conformi'ty provisions of this"section are intended iu�imjt the number and extent of non-conforming "structures ,by= prohib',tinq their being moved, altered, or enlarged in a manner :that would increase the discrepancy between exisluinq conditions and the standards prescribed in this :Code 0 Specif cally, no non-conforming strtriture shall be altered in a manner that would be inconsistent with required setbacks: The City Planner, has determined thiv-1Pe carport addition constituted an• alteration which is incons' it } with these regulations (see Exhibit "A't). V. STAFFS COMMENTS: if the Planning Commission wishes to uphold the appeal,; variances must be applied 'for, public,,;,hearings held to consider same, and approvals granted. In ordr to' grant the Variances, certain findings would need to be made indicating that there are exceptional=or-extraordiiiary�circutsistances or conditions ,r applicable to the propert+? involved and `that strict or literal interpretation of the°Code vjald result in a practical difficulty, or unnecessary physical hardship. In this instance, it is staffs opinion that there are, no unusual circumstances applicable to that property, nor would a physical hardship be incurred, if the applicant were required to locate,the structure consistent with setback requirements. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends"that the Planning Commission deny ' the appeal through adoption of the attached Resolution. t lM1 1 1 J,'; _PLANNING'COMkSSION 57AFF'REPORT RE: 'MDR 89-22 - GEIVEIT ' October 11, 1;989 Page a Res c ully sub ed, r� City Pl. ner BH:VB:ko ss Attachments: Exhibit "A" Mfiwx Development Review Letter Na, 1 Exhibit "B" - Minor bevelopment Review Letter No. 2 Exhibit °C" - City Pyanner' Letter of Den=tal Exb-ibit "D" Letter•.of Appeal Exhibit "E" -Site Plan Exhibit "F" Elevations Resolution of Denial tr ' !j r s r �Y r l J �' i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pat cfft a on so.Reaeso c.e+mouse rWonre 41730,tit+)4E4•1851 September 16, 1987 Ralph Plumhoff _ 8517 Grove` Rancho Cucamong ., California 91730 SUBJECT. Minor 04ove1optreit Review 87-46 - Carport Addition at 8517' Grove Dear Mr. Plumhoff: Your application for;the above-mentioned desc,*ibed .proJect has been reviewed for completeness and accuracy of filing. As result of the review, thgfTroject application has been found to be i,'lcomplete for processing.- More imr, tantly, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.02.130G, I have reviewed your'request and determined the following: 1. The existing site and structures are non-conforming in fro nts'yard and Interior side yard setbacks and parking facilities, as follows: a. The existing 4616" x 4816" body sfidt structure has a setback of 30 feet from Grove Avenue, -whereas a 35 foot setback is required, b. The existing 32' x 126' building has a. setback of 8 eetefrom the easterly property line, whereas a 20 'foot setback, is required. c.. The existing on-site parking does not meet the required parking ratio of 1 space for every. 400 .aqua-. feet. of gross which shall be 9 feet by 19 feet in size and daubte striped, 2. The proposed carport structure constitutes an addition to the area, existing nonticonforRing_structure. The Development Code defines an addition'as any construction which increases the size a;-s building or facility in terks of site coverage, heigk!"4, length, width, or gross floor area'. 3• The proposed carport would have a setback of 40 feet from Arrow, whereas a' 45 foot setback from curb is required. Your existing building setback is 64 feet from Arrow, therefore any expansion can not: .L' any larger. than 17' x 191. 4. The proposed carport world be inconsistent with the intent of the Develo pment Code regulations which prohibit the enlarg nt of non- - conforming ' structures because it would increase the discrepancy between existing conditions and the standards for setback from Arrow,; �dgnr Detic®h N Brown Ca�rilwewbr, i�r 1 L i L 6: � %NA1 I Unanu L$tout Jelrrey rci,,, eery uenSrer shade•) nuuutcil „� � @amtlal.tVrijhf LeucenAC'Lvazzertra? i, RALPA PLUMHO'FF RE MDR 87-46 September 16p 198? Page 2 As an alternative, staff suggests that the carport bel scaled down in sfi'ze, to 17' x 19' which would not,6acroaeh A to the required 45 foot s�tbaek from Arrow. Staff could work with,you" an a request fora 17, x 19' carport sub3ect. to landscape im 'vements atong`the. street' fronta94:,� ,Ndwever, staff Gould-noir:Y, support the 17 x Z44 carport as ,proposed. Ple4e' contact staff within 14 days as to your_i'ntantion to proceed'as proposed Sor to modify the carport. Failure to respond within 14 days will be assumed "p indicate that you da not want to modify your request and final action will 62 takers. Sincerely,: COMMUNITY .DEYELOPMENT'DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION- r u City P anner 880Mo I_ 4• f ��v '^ 4 12� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PostOffire Ouj sod.9Aneh0 Cueamongs,CA6fomia 917-19,pt1)99v1$51 August 1, 1989 " Howard & Yolanda Geivett 8517 North,fr;.ove Avenue'. Rancho Cucamonga, ZZA 91737 SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 8942 - A CARPORT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING BODY SHOP AT $517 NORTH GROVE AVENUE Dear Mr. & Mrs. Geivett: Your application for the above-referenced project has been reviewed by the Planning and Engineering Divisions. As a result of the review, it has been determined that the addition 'cannot be approved as designed because it does not meet Development Code Standards for required setbacks. Attached Rlease find a list outlining the setback requirements, as well as required improvements for parking, landscaping; screening, driveways, and streets. An identical application for a carport addition at the same address was submitted to the Planning Division on,?,kugust 19, 1987. At that time, the setback requirements and public i"6�-,ovement were discussed and the applicant: decided to withdraw the Minor Development Review application. Since then, the addition has been built without building permits or Planning and;, Engineering approval. Our development requirements have not changed; therefore, the setbacks and required improvements arethe same as in 1987. The City Planner has reviewed a request to enlarge the non-conforming structures and determined that the Planning Division would support a 171 x 191 carport subject to certain improvements along the street frontages. You have the following options: . 1. Modify your Minor oevelopment''Review request to alloy ti 171 x 191 carport, which would ultimately requi:`tl reconstructing the carport that was built without permits. I 2. Remove the carport and withdraw your Minor Development Review request. f � Ld�rtHlmrmFrH )n i tt:w• William 1.Atexander Charles 1,duquet.Il Cow U'"4et i Dennis L. Stour Deborah\,brown Pamela 1.Wright jack Lim,AICP Howard & Yolanda 6eivett ` MDR 89-22 ;( August 1, 1989 --7 Page 2 Please contact°Pstaff within 14 days as to your intention to modify the carport or removeor .. Failure to respond within 14 days;will be assumed to indicel"e th.0 you do not,want to modify your request. and the matter wi11 a,tu' ed over to -'u'r Code .Worcement Section J� to _ensure removal of tho structure. i Sincerely, COMMUNITY" DEVELOMENT ? ARTMENT , PLA DIVISION' Dan Coleman Principal Planner OC:VB:mlg cc: Code Enforcement, Joe Torrez Attachments: Letter dated September 16, 1987 Planning and,:Engineering Counts r Ir . f t I 3 ti 5 r t{ Planning Division The following are technical issues whici; do not meet the-_yCity's Development Code; 1. Arrow Highway is a designated Special Boulnvard;with a 45-foot build;irig setback from the ultimate curb face. The proposed carport loca+ion encroaches into this r setback and the;, �ore must be relocated. .' 2. Currently, the on-site parking 'is inado,iate and shall be revised to meet current standards. i a`,king shall be provided at a rate of I space for'evjry 400 square feet of gross floor area; with Andiviaaual-,stalls which shall . be 9 Laet by 19 feet in size.and double striped. 3. All areas for the storage; or maintenan4e of equipment and vehicles' shall be completely screened t,from view, The existing storage area:, located at the southeast portion of the site, is visible tr� the south from Grove Avenue and,9th -Street. Comnissi(, policy is to` rewire solid masonry,scT"..en walls for, opening.' 4. The City's Development Code'`requires. street frontage landscaping,-which is'15 feet in depth for Arrow Highway and 35 feet ,along ;Grove Avengei, as meisured from the ultimate curb face. Therefore, the two areas labeled "open, dirt', on the proposed;`::'te plan shall 6e landscaped to these:,standards, The landscaping., shal;a include a corob9 is*ion of undulating mounds with shrubbery, whidk,, hall be 5-gallon in size.olanted at:3 feet on center; for screening .,purposes, as :well as appropriate groundrByer and trees:, 5. "ae additional comnshcy,in.Seotember, 16, 1987 letter. Engineering Di4ision i. An additional 6 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated along hihL4-Route. Provide an offer of dedication for an entry monumeLnt."at the intersection (see attached sketch), 2. Refer to the attached Driveway Policy regarding the placement of driveways on° arterial streri:s, including Arrow-Route and Grove Avenue, Both driveways shall be recanstructed to Commercial' Standards (No. 306 attached) r' and relocated as follows: a) Locate the Arrow Route driveway as close to 'the east property line as possible and reduce the width to M j feet., and b) Locate,--the Grove Avenue driveway on or near the South property line and provide a joint use easement in. favor-of thi property owner to the south. R7, wY 1 Planning-3ivision Paget k t I Street improweinents along both, project frontrdges strait be 'brought up to current City standards, including curb and gutter" where driveways a j relocated,' sidewalk, street lights.and street trees. ,. ii C r I. 1 w j, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I'3st t2S%ce 60<807,RanSho CLcamonga,C;liSomia _.i September 8, 1989 �l i j Howard and Yolanda Ge-ivett 8517 North Grove Avenue j Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917,30 SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89 f;2 A CARPORT ADDITION TO AN j EXISTING BODY,.SHOP AT 8517 NORtH GROVE.AVENUE Dear Mr. i Mrs. Geivett: ` The Planning Division has den ed.;your request for a- Minor Development, Review based upon the following technical issues which `;lo'not Pjeet, the` City's Development Code: A. Arrow Hig:tway is a designated Spacial Boulevard wltit„ _:'45-foot:, building setback from the ultimate curb face. The proposed-.- carport location encroaches into this setback and therefore must be relocated. S. Currently, the on-site parking is inaea4uate and must be revised to meet current standards,. Parking m0,t be provided` at a rate of I space for every 400 's.,.;are feet of gross floor area, with individual stalls Which,.must be 9 feet by;19 feet,, in size' and double striped.- C. All areas for' the storage or maintenance of equipment and vehicles must'be completel,rscreened f nm view. The eicisti*1g storage area, located at the southeast,p�rtton of the_sitea'is, J isit�lr to -the south fromt Grove "Avenue. and 9th Street. Commission policy is to require solid masonry screen walls for , screening.. D. The City's Development 'Code requires• street frontage landscaping, which is 45 feet in average depth fbr� Arrow Highway and 35 feet along Grove Aventt, as measured from the ultimate curl- face-. Therefore, the L two areas labeled "open dirt" on the proposed site plan rust be landscaped to these standards. The landscaping «past' include a combinat -;n of undulating liwtarrd$"CFi:t1i ShPiabbery, ;which,,-shall .1t£ 5-g, on itn, size planted at 3 feet on centrr,'fbr screening purposes, as. well as appripriate groundco`ver`and trees.. l n tt :4•s William 1.Alexander Charles 1.Burluelt; Dennis L Stout. Deborah .tln++en Pamela J.Wright Jag Lami1C[' r, 1 ' 1J U r The denial is based upon the fallowing findings. L The proposed project is-tot consistent with the General Plan. 8. The proposed pM ect--is accordance with=tiseF0b3ectives- of.the Development "Code, or the propose of the district in which"the site is"'Aocated. C. The; proposed project together witd tte' conditions"applicable thereto, will be.`detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties,.or improvements ins the vicinity. r. The proposed project will not comply with' each of the;, applicable, provisions of' the Development .This decision shall'�be final following -a ten a(10) day"appeal period beginning with the dalce of this letter. Appeals must be, filed: in writing with the Planning 'Commission Secretary, state the reason.";{or:the appear, and be accompanied by;a $52 appeal fee:` If you would have" arty questions, please do nbt hesitate to call 'since Bertoni at MO 989-I8&i. AM Sincerely, R., COMMU OE r' ENT DEPARTMENT P G Brad ler Ci tann_ BB:VB•sp f }} , I SE? a$ 8517 North Grove Avenue t �y� Rancho Cuoamonga, Ca. 91730 �t September 16, 1939 Brad Buller, City Planner Community Dev;alopment Department Planning Divii.'on City of-$anch6Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California '91729 SUBJECT:, APPEAL OF CITY PLANNING DECISION TO DENY MINOR DEVELOPMENT, [REVIEW 69-22 - A CARPORT ADDITION TO AN :EXISTINQ AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR SHOP AT 8517 N(RTH GROVE AV RJE. Dear Mr. Buller: Thank you for your recent visit. to Lee Wise Garage and for taking your time 'to explain theCity's plans for beautification and 'future development. Thank you also for explaining the possibility of appealing. the original denial of the minor deyelgr- nt proposal. This letter is our appeal far„you to reeonsider what should be required to leave the carport in place .or be,located''elsewhf;6 on the saws property.. Your`ibasis for the original denial of this development proposal and stipulations concerning other developments Mould impose an enormous capital outlay on our pzrt. We consider'suoh a capital outlay to be impractical, therefore actually slowing or eliminating any possibility of improving the Leo Uise GarageJacilities ,ter properties. ASK In the following paragraph we .restate the pia;pose of the carport.:,and '1 respond to the issues raised in A, B C, and D of your letter dated September 6, 1989. Please refer to the enclosed pictures of the property as you consider these points. Purpose of carport-- To protect two car"�-rd;a personal;oar and that of the shop manager. A. The carport as'constructed encroaches only slightly on the 45' setback from Arrow Highway. We believe that at this time the carport.is .not_"&2 trimental-te:hes th, as s..y` ,:�e'�fare or - materially injurious to properties or i4iovements in the area."s If at A later time, nearby properties were improved and the cs',,port proved to be injurious to those propperties, the carport could, easily be removed or relocated. COUld a,waiver, be approved now rrr�airing the removal of the structure in the event that such a problem arises? B. Parking, area is sufficient. 'Harking could be arranged immediafeTy'to meet city codes. Twelve indoor parking spaces are presently in use. Do these help to most the,quota required by the City? k C. Screening of Poutheast storage area: could be worked out, though some type of access is necessary. {, D. If the landscaping requirement can be mct by landscaping Qhly, ;, I he "open dirt" areas, ws too have an interest in,making that impr^vement to:our property. 1. Z )are not opposed to improving the appearance of our property. � Actually, we would. be' ?leased to make certain improvements within, practical aconomic�lim 'ts. The carport is itself such an improvement i- ny of our customeraIand no chbors have commented on the cleanliness of, our facility In gen}era'l,and have complimented us on the carport addition> in particular. Furthermore, though not an-essential part of our business; the carport is a convenience we enjoy. We believe thrt'the plans y,)u outline for the imorovemant of our cityc are very desi,iable. These surely will greattllveihance an already enjoyable plice.to live and an appealing piece to do business. Please understand that ot1 intent is to participate with you an this effort in an economy ally feasible fashion )l f 1 (t j Thank you for` raconsf eying our prapnaal-;--'We lour£orirar"d' , fCe your decision cO'�,, ni�g this,appeal: ` �� very imperely. `s 6Adw, ez and oleY,da Ge3.vett ti .t fj .Q �st� � � a STY mWok 9 ^; tWONGA P I li a ; � •;'°lr > N 5 4 +i - l •.1. o y CIITY Ori M - ITME- "N —�— AMION �.� a> f } i 4D 1 RESOLUTION RO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUC41ONGA 'PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 89-22, LOCATED ON t. THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND GROVE AVENUE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL' DISTRICT AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 207-220-05. A. Recitals. (i) An application has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by Howard and Yolanda Geivett (hereinafter "applicant"), fora Minor Development Review for the approval of an existing carport addition to the north side of an automotive repair shop located on the, sogtheast'corner .of Grove Avenge and Arrow Highway, hereinafter referred'to,a3 'ahe,:application!'. (ii) On September 8, 1989, the City Planner denied the,, application. (iii) The City Planner:'s denial Was timely appealed to the Planning Commission on September.18; 1989. (iv) )n-the 11th day:,of October, ;,989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. conducted .a p;~eting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (v) A1,J legal prerequisites to the adoption of' this Resolution has occ�Pred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, 'determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the. City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This_Commissim hereby spectficalIy finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. `._ 2. : Based,.-upon -substantial ouidence pr�setsted=to this- Co^:nissian during the above-referenced meeting on October 11, 1.989, including written and oral staff reports, this'Comnission hereby specifically finds as follows. (a) The application applies to property located at 8511 Grove. Avenue, with a street frontage of 189 feet and tot,depth of 225 feet and is .presently improved with an automotive, repair shop, an asphalt parking 1� tth 13 spaces, and no street frontage landscaping; and, �� , (b) The property to the north of the subject site is sing`le�` family residential, ,_the property to the, south of that site consists ,of commercial vacant •the property to the east is single.familyresidential and the property to�the west is the City of Upland; and s 1 r PLANNING COMMISSI6N.RESOLUTION NO:, RE: NOR 8942e - CEJ� TT y ! October 11,;1989 Page 2. (c) The ca,+mpurt addition was built with oui Minor Development, Review approval or building permits; and. (d) the carport acAition does not conform With the Cityis setback requirements; a6t (e) The carport addii)-,,�, constitutes :an addition to an existing non-Conforming sti%ucture and (f) The carport addition in, incarisisthnt: With the intent of the Development Lode regulations which prohibit: the enlargement of non- •conforming structures. 3. Based upon the•subsWtial'ovidence presented 'to this:Commission during the above-refereiced. meeiing and upon the, specific f.ifidings of facts set forth in paragr4ghs7;1 and`2 above, this, Commission hereby, finds and concludes as follows.t (a) That the proposed project is not - cpnsistent''With the objectives of the'Oevelopment ,Code, and the purposes o the district in which the site is located; and (b) That the proposed project is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions :o.f, the DeVelopment Code, and , (c) That the pro�_?rsed• project is not consistent with the• General Plana �.. . 4. Based' upon. the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 5. The Secretary to this Cormissioii shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ,y t_JM1 APPROVED taDOPTED +�;k5 21TH-.i?.".�•£F-fICTO$ER -lBd? PLANrfING COMMISSION OF THE CITY Oh RANCNtJ CUCAMONGA BY Larry WNW,,CHMiaq ATTEST: Bra3 IuMr> S ea mtavy t> PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION T aO-j RE: MOR 89--22 - GEIVETT +� October 11a 1989 Page 3 4 C' I, Brad EU112r, Secretary of the Planning Commissi'On of th 'City of Rancho Cucamonga, 'do hereby certify that .,tne foregoing Resolution was``duly .and regularly introduced, passed, and. adopted �y the Planning Comnission .nf the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular mAtinj\. the Planning Co�nission held on the 11tn day of October, 1989; by the fbllow'iipg.vote to-wit , AYES: C6WISSIONERS: NOSS: COMT1SSIONERS: VSENT: COMM�i"SSIONERS: t J (l �1 bl - l , l� tv titi j 3Y1 1 � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .DATE: Octobe',11, 1989 TO: Chairman and MemlXers of the Planning--commission FROM: Brad Buller, Cj,Ey Planner SY: Vince Bertoni, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 8940 -;GRACE RESTAURANT COMPANY - The design review of building elevations and I:Zailed.site plan for a 6,100 square foot restaurant wit.;in an existing, commer0al shopping center in Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the northeast corner of Haven-Avenue and Base-Line Road - APN: 107.6-481.31' I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION_ A. Action Requested: =Approval of the detailed site plan and t building elevations. Pam, B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Child care center, single family residences; 'Mea Density Residential (8`-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant, single family residences; Medium Density Residential (8-14 .dweling units per acre) East - Single family residences; Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units ,per acre) West - Single famtly resideh,,es; Wn Density Residential ('2- 4 dWel i ing,units; pe _a rre) C. General Plan Designations,,:, Protect Site -, NeiDhhorhood Commercial North - Medium Density Residential„-f South - Medium Density Residential East - Medium Density Residential West - Medium Density Residential D. Site Characteristics: name building pad site i� vacant and slopesgenerally enera north to south. Vegetation consistsr- native grass,. 4 F' x PLANNING COMtiISSION Sf'AF$`,REPORT ;ter RE: OR 89-"O - GRACEY'REST. CO., October 11, 1989 Page 2Mv F. Pa r k 'ag Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Restaurant 6,100 1/100 62 62 II. ANALYSIS:, A. General- The project site is .located within the Terra Vista Village Shopping Center, as shown in Exhibit "C". The majority - of the shopping center has been completed. This is 'the last retail pad to be submitted for developments a build-to-suit for Coco"s Restaurant. The proposed site play and elevations are consistent with the approved shopping center, however!, a ;. condition has be6. 'added to the Resolution to enspre :that";he sidewalk treatmen ` ,round the restaurant is consistent witY ,6e rest of the center.- r" B. Design Review Committee., The Committee (Ch tlea, Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed t e �^rased project on September 7, 1989 and recommended approval with the following revisions: 1. Decorative panel doors",hould be. used on the south and west elevations`, 2. Field the insets should be added to thy, south and west elevations. 3. The service entrance should be .Scre" cP,.d by a 4 foot wall with planters using Burger Mng to the north as an example 4. The wall adjacent to the entrance should be enhanced with an architectural element(s), such as the qudZ1afoils used in the center, 5. The Cantera colunitt should be' br6ught 'around to the north elevation, or spandrel glass should be used as a wind4-- e7,ent. i. 6. The parapet finish,should, be stucco on the north elevation. . I 7. A mission style wing 'wall should be used at the west terminus of the treenhouse on the north elevation. 'PLINNINO C(?MISSION:STAFF REPORT RE: 'DR 89-20 GRACE RESTi CO'.(5f, Octul3er 11, '1985 Pagi� 3 � I i 8. The greenhouse element style should ` be less t5" contemporary, such as the greenhouse at the Edwards Mansion. in Redlands. 9. Use a rust color tin cornice to math the rest of the center. 10. Spanish style the accents should match the rent of the center. 11._. Oeletej�jrdscaping on re4°ised building elevations. The revised plans were revrtewed by, the Committee,, (Chitiea, Tolstoy, Coleman) on September 21 and appNvai was rr�com ended_, subject to: 1. A Terra CItta element, similar to those found in the rest of the :center within the inset areas, shaold;,3l used in-lieu cf the tile. l 2. The arc�Jitectural details, elements, and the materials colors used should .be consistent; with Affilktt'}.exist�hg center. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: }T'be pro ps"d project 'is consistent with the ybjectives of th? General Kjn and thEr Terra" Vista Planned Community. The propoi'd use,,building design, site plan, together with the recommended Conditions'of Appr° ��*' .are n i com^fiance with bt each of the applicable provisions ors �;�velopment Code and the Terra Vista Planned Community, The pvbpdsed use.,together with the conditions applicable thereto, -111 not ;,Ie detrimental to the public health or welfare or mTterially 1hJ6rious to the properties {; or improvements in the vicinity; IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends-I ;.hat the Planning Commission approve-Development Review,89-20 subji4,,qt to _tanditions contained in the attached Resolution. `. R fully t Bra eau r t� 11 City nner a BB:VB:ko r t 17•; .. `•�•j PLANT NGDR"' COMM1�SIO(i STAFF REPOT RE: 89-20 -';.RACE REST.;'W. October I1,.1989 Page 4 t Y, Attachment-$ Exhibit O.A;' Logation Map , r Exhibit 'B" - ApOrovpd Master Flan a�thibit "c" Gonceptval,Grading.'P�an, - c Exhi6lt •"O"' -Suhceptual Site and`Landscape"Plan Exh G3i„'°E"' Eas$ 'S&tWt and 1,lest Elavations: ' � P406 t ',P° ;'mrtib-Elevetion Resolzt iatt of Approva' with Standard Condltiot.t''' F J, R t y Fl F r. , ,.i rr { r: �....1 ,r..;�.,�,� g. `Ply•" Y 5 � r�m� /�I 1.i 41 IJC n,. L�MT`: SCAM A1Cki� Fs.t } �l JL Lf rlry i d ®NGA qm TME1 . Eli 7 SCALE r: VALV=AV£. .-• P�,-... use ud(� ` .. 1 " vn•rr[e•� [u t t rrD _ �� l� a Z.K•n�nunv+��r[ �� rs d I� COCBS RES7AU?ANT �•a tuw Pi.•22Z0 � -Aa 6 PAW21.70 W CITY OF,, MONGA MM tt i PLA1, � ION LF om s, �S tiM_ 7 1 �_ —e.•e...pr�srs.ru«. .pml 7>ifp o�grws d, i lam f�}MaA 1MM NLY311A/ '� fa �i� �- F'w'.!a�. 'e°wra°'rrtnY�—•�., 'pwJv Awe.*q�f�I ,` �••• a p.+.rsE�fyq.le s��w61(vy ) 1 P.f..M.vfw\.•.• aw ww Ire v—! 1 .*A mpy p. ,sww.a' •owe 7vna��,iia+r w.I:iw s+.a7. A) ( �x•r.,r.w .Iwe� �7aq. t'• �i t f 1' IATcI l9i Mr;�., r'rGO.."wo— 14 v IYM>Yf sa JC,. � I ._.�� •��:•l rsw c+.+w..+..«o• rt ■ate.��w1�� !!lppO ® ONHq=® tt -. PL ION tft EXHM M 'i. I rn- F n, A � � y A . ' T � uaiLq\741q,��ri#Y(ef Y47dt,'�,4= A E T ■� a 'ML Sid jYY1 � ®k� ;■ 1� ��r.��..-.tip...., -...r....... IN , •-.� t'.iw.t uTw.r�+��.,uPbT.el.rWww.��...�..W"1+�"! �.:', � ( r s ' '�. r.wn�.. ♦M...ZriS'6S1k�eT Rs- 1 q"� '�= Y v f . i �r z 7,ra�rmr,�Ps ��I i G"IT"3Y �iO;' GA rmK �, RESOLUTION NO. . A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 89-20; ,LOCATED AT` THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF <BASE LINE ROAD AND 'HAVEN AVENUE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRI.CT, ,AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT-THEREOF. ,APN: 1076-981-31. A. Recitals. (i) Grace Restaurant Company, has filed an application for the approval of Development Review-"!o.,89-20 as described in the"title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request 'is referred to.as "the application". (ii) On the 11th of October, 1989, the Planning Commission of the, City of Rancho. Cucamonga.cooidoctte a .meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of" this Resolution have occurred. , B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determitled-:.and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamo�,ga as follows:- 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution ars,�-rue ar.:t corroit. 2. Based ;upon substantial evidence presented W finis Commission during the above-referJnced meeting on October o 11, 1989, including w ritte• n amk. o►•al staff reports, this tmssiun hereby sPecirica�ly inds as toisows•(a) The application applies to property 1aated at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue. atd Base Line Road wish a street frontage of 860 feet and lot depth;of 855 feet and is presently lmprrwed; and (b) The property to the north of the aubject site is a child care center and single family residential, the, property to the .`oath, of that site consists of,-vacant land, and single family residential, the �,"operty to the east is single family residential, and the property to the,west'is, single family residential. (c) The. project site is part of the preWinoslu -spproved master plan for the Terra Vista Village Shopping Center (CUP 86-05). 3 .Base upon the substantial evidence presentees to this Cokmissiot during the above-re.`erenced meeting;;and upon :the'spacii'ic` findfngs of facts' set forth in paragraphs 1 and ? abov(;, this Commission hereby;,finds and concludes as follows: ' PLANNING COME tSS,ION'RESOLUTk", N0. DR 89-2Q - GRACE RESTAURANT COMPANY October 11, 1989 ,. Page 2 t, (a) That the proposed project is censiste�nt With the'objectimes of the General Plan, and (b) That the proposed use is in accord' with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the 'district in whi' h the site is locates;..and': (c) That the proposed use is, in compliance With each of the applicable provisions of the Developmentgd`e, any. (d? That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will -,not be detn`,�Mental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious � properties or, improvements in the vicinity. 4 'JThis 'amaission h'zreby f«ndscand certifies that,the project has been reviewed and considered 4n`compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1070, and, further, this Commission. granted a' Negative Declaration on August a,..X986,. for the entire shopping center (OP '86-05). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every; condition set forth below, and in the attached Standard 1;orri;.tions,.attached hereto and incorpoy,ated herein by this reference. Planning Division. (1) .All pq,.tirent conditi-,ns ;of approval -contained in Planninfg Commission Resolution 86419 shall apply, (2) The site shall' be deVe aped red mrIntained in accordance With the appruved'-'site -,plan,,_ whiah includes architectural elevations,, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading, or, file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained- therein, and the , D.evelo pment CadP.. regulations. (3) The,:sidewalk treatment arour;d the restaurant shall i be Consistent with the existing shopping center, (4) A Terra Cotjta element similar to those found in the. rest of the center within the inset areas, shall be (1 used in-lieu of the tile. - N a � PLANNING Ctk�itISSION"94SOLUTION NO, 09 $9-20 - GRACE RESTAURANT,COKpANY October 11, 1989 Page 3 C5} The final design of iands"pe, )'hardscape, and textural walkway�pavement shall bej�submitted for,, r� City planner review and approval prior to"issuancb of building.permits. (6) All architectural elements such as, but not limited to, colors, Texture of pavement, materi-als,, detailiifg, and.lighting,fixtures shall be'onsistent with the exiting shopping canter; Building and Safety Blvision,, (1) All drainage ,and site layout shall cq'ni'orm to they 5 approved conceptual grading plant for,CUV`!a$6»05. (2) Oetait i�grading plan showing the perimeter and,the limits -of required on-site improvements ,Such''as sufficieht,ilmproveaants to. establish .drainage and traffic c"i"rc lotion, Shall be submitted for plug check'pror,to issuance of grading permit. (3) Detailed%ress»seGt;ions-at all site boundaries for building pad shall be Opvided for Arlan check. r "# F.ngineerina Division (1) Conditions of ap�'rova1 for CUP 86:05 as contained in Planning, .Cbtmtission Resolution NG. 86-119 shall apply. ' 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the �ttoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS I1Tti DAY QF OCTO8Ep,, 1939, PLANNING GOMISSION OF`K CITY OF RANCHO CUC1nMON4 A BY Carry T. a- , Chairman ATTESI"- grad guller, Secretary ,. PLANNTI C�TSS% ` 'RES�LU OR,89-2Q - GRACEtSiAdRAiiT COMPANY Ck 1 0, tuber z1,�589 ' 1 Page 4 it I, Brad Buller, Se r2taFy f'f b? rlann ng Comvi&sion of 1`'ne City of Rancho ' Cucamonga, do hereby certify that. the foreg(%Lj.T . Resolution was dulylr and ' regularly introduced, passed, and; adopted by the '?larjning. Comriissiurf o1,�tt City of Rancho Cucamori?ga,-at a regular, Meetingof be. s'1a�rii�►9 Commis "tl �n the 11th day of-befit bet 19$4,-bx t 4 fnl iawi�g�vote�to=�;"� �'• r .,. AY£S• • Gt�"lMISS`SONERS ,. ___1 • 4t , 4% NOES:' COMMISSf.iONERSt LJ l ABSENT.-* COM+4ISSTONEf 't� i ,j *a • i{ j Lr _ \1 •`'fir Y y.y� M Yp < yy q® E tl�$tJ o..'i: ti'�e'n O tj'wa.. c rt Yu c� q•`i oa , �ffi Ted ypY tat �. � Ia;'�. ..`, a:Ybw.Yo wee b�aa >y YEuwa YY � _ NV OY 4w .§A.. Y1.1 N Y U? CIS tlN0. 4�Y C11" w C Y.6Y�VLiON ggMVY +Z� Ol � G y �C9�' yQL�■aOy •��QC .apy�Y�.� tiLw G 01 �Y 9a ".7 �r. f! C " .yCrU'.O�w N0009�Y w w» C 6 4��C L d V tl C 6 L d d r.O■ M Y Y C �yyl p G C�,.r •tko d HC '�N�q NN SI+ O4a�... OYYG UC ONYb UM�yNyr{�F.i C YO(!U b QQ � 6GaHhw iV .� 4 4.iOf t a EwV+ waaN��.'apY ti a8+ $ N � Q6i�pu wT+y,ya4 '- ai :ems� a:. � •' S �aC»�o�.f�p�'g«G MC fS 9 Mw•• .Y $ $ piZ..qg^O spy o.H a I `�^e �..y.� �o�y�w'. A.L L� �w�u. oe.,i.� sA� y�... • $� � ' O4�atl YCY� Qyp40tY Yqp 0 a Ny 7 p^O. Oaf uyio 1g +9: �N M S N�Ay p0 u u a�>S YC,� Aaye L�L�w p ` �N�Qf Up•1. rd1 N� D�; O.■g9G�Sa sY dim .,a "WJ coa'3 C�CTT��G�. `�t{aYt:ilo^aN. ah^ Na d'a"d ` Nwa� gu .. G. 6 CCC N 0 ,':. u'.9 S L G•:C: 7 j 1 S.C C 1 YTL C Y c A Z y(q 4. C O qCq a COOL q N�.�r M`M `MO w Y 4:N. 44 yL.. M ^o M,z iW c!1 MY N y c c c YY yy c Y U O �• QOY' O r CLAY Y O O+qq N '.: a.C Y AG N: O y e,I:c�Y. ' Y A• A S C N MWr y 6 V a w S A tl! CJ� G O Coy 01Q�.9�SiN C`, iryYR+.O�y=nNA�O�``ggyrCaOY��t1.Y3�}SIQ+f 0•W1cy OyV�OC CNcNy��Ac0w.q.. �N+I8VqqVQQQ�6��Gf�9•��4lp�..wC.0N.OS1�M►�`�YYN.^uC�MS M_Ca:CM A6�OS aeaY■�`yyC_^,�-'q�ptl_ Nc•�CSigY Yil..�N �CNN iq■y ?NC4L• —QCQA 9C S Q; a.. OI^ 21 Q-SE 59S^ Yi�S -•.._....�qc^60=S0N( = S« e W � YY G to .� q YYy dCl imr� {J:` aLM-L wg 4Yc y,0 'all Cy M ii Y 4 K 0'w O W C.�.; G, K C�V S N 6 s$sttss as� rzsI 'fie•= ��pC o:"+c '�.: '.cc • ®< ..'T�`e wa yueow sra�in:. .. ewu ��.. u.uc ... T. � .8u ��r w'f•`tw.si'i 'S�a ^•$ as -32 g. L o �a=E � •.. r .+ >3w�v •_� • � �� u a0 Ny y,� .`." ono��: u��w all � Na` a r'Lw � w ,�pv�p ag� ' ";CNg r- •., s �o Ap-e6 yia �XBL� �qqW�,, NA 9-4 C- 0.c y p yq ��51ii '�w3 0.4 �O. �YaV1�C^p� MI Otl .Q.� µ�.6 C♦OyQ _V A W® g W l � N� pC1 f Yi. �p'i N yMC� S�1� A op aN da � L4� Vw i4q®vC�� . ]rC �N C4 G » w6`'Y 'O9ec`� I— ALW Yw'q fybWr }� fro!'.-.a c.°.t L es .ri^wo Qe� oa eu its a L6rs r � ra" •+ w wow � � Wa4 a+ay. p�b �■�S Zi�w s+ A� �wt:e� � y NyM 1 a, `y , �a_ i^•' JC. N iRy w .01 _� w-Ny}� 'YYW6 b Qaa Vl. L 45 it O V N �' g~ O bw0. 01`�.m.. tl •L C C Y V p w O ` 4vo5� , y a�Ymcp 4 cc C >- �r ri N.� tl4f• m •C•Ne� 4' p poa bbb t. o'-u. w1ptl Y�a^i+'i ,fir `° w•'F�� CL ga yaq Apt MN/" VO x,��y Lo�^N ate« VQV N�j... a qF �V.V w' wm Vtl. 4 R2. �WL Ljp +'CNg 2C.C.f'R� C w,'s Far B �tlt /4..'/� NiAO Ap'M tl eL� �e$ ��sNy 4&�i4s YA AN.+`� yy 1 Y (�py.,L 4'N'NN�r.�M.y pyG.t1_F:.�� yw{{Q� p1y a YELL ". NL y■yNCgii iq. V LO��YGy•9.�yC1 04�. f�C �M �1N��i L w 4 w V H N E. �tl 301 NY RN y AU N3319 r �g Xii � av� `6 _a IS T4y� gvvVc rd c.�+ .'ri'4N w Y$ can is �aY+C M AA.. Cv w.&� �+�� L.� w � w iV pY .1 Yo3? Z eY Pr wa 4w F S'f- 8pw ! N $my.y ■�y�p Kta. y fS� y. yY '� �Y+ gN�. t^ 6� ��V VmwQ{M��Q�.�l44 c0 rnC3� M V.Oj O.g� ® C ,t} :"`«« u.. eC aa kP. Ygdr�.I 0- a- -p$� V9S p Ap Oi�MV�®O� �9 vI,q � ,R.�n V gg. tl A'SIG eu. AZ. �5 ec'.t# . ' s'1ffio �R$w w , w s Y Y r N a ® 1 1 S'. 9-9' 9'A^ o�� . jYtM�., �NY- � ` m •,w..■Y01 "}� _. �,,, LO WS3 O b V L q A 4.NN 4 C L '.g�g �O�■ q�!�!.. ��tl�^Y M C 6 O p.. e.1`L �W�1. V -L• �+V.9 �'3 V y Lp u c sC�L gYY_m o�� v+Y W qq yytt�� qq e� c+ ; Y ,C6dYL 0. 6 ANY TyU IA V I N�L�•C�y : 'L �.�' V Sa Y PIN i mr C V • �N _O G G ~ s O pN� `N Kis+-, C V V C c C C VLp yy {p� V O e N tdi pYp Cp C` ~1� O N �6y21 L �y �y qiTw 5 ni9 4'r 84:2 Ng'O'� O ♦1 CN b i.] 0'6`� c.^. a @.N a' .per 5z Ig.% r..,•.yyy 42 d .=$' 8 e e�s �1cg l2mECN LQQ i QMP�Y tlVV® =fzGO YL V Es y�54ggi Y'� > 1 �...� � - Ss 0�, f.7 .�. .>r d rLsn ua J.4� A W� C ®® Nrp .:YL4C Y MMd V L �i� � GbS p� �'®� V@ B� ^..pMN a�..qd W $ d Pit W V IL Of�'` V $V Cyr aii8$$777 Vw _ y NtlL {�{ ��yy6wa. + It �yyyRpp m'NO g®VNN �6' �Ntl3a Cm r � �C �j� .m Utz .:m �Si 6 YJ _ �... 11- -rS 1 45 r i a 77 �oac vt ANIL S��p yY�ISyMC� 0 NL,p LUp� MO sr:;Zq Cott. LC D L 4i �^ qa all $q�� ' z � cN o C9pL v O sWv :`boo^S ac:� s�YN we. u Gc•o. iPo �spN a� a�s a� d d `� 2 aa yNYO -y GV Y. �6tl�p�i dgCt 4Y^ '. N^Ca■R:A ty �'p. y O wW yu f� Vr.1N504 As ^Op wgV4 L ie y^ CC OO� y {� ppyyR A R L Q d 9� CC W ' a A P} t�f Y Vf SDI. Imo. WI. Y .i. Cd v.0 C V C U M tl 1L1 M « CILO .'S.V 0«il 01.N. ;x ua` c b « :4 V' wtl 8 yO q V 6 yy oo �J q�a Z..>1 .�. �C Ward' CO^. L V agg. VW 'NYO� AEG C So, ^.� �^ gg -0 O u i$a�� 6g y Cq `yY y�LLA.4 Y o p ay �w L'y �' ro '$ « ag`f o$«i► gyps '�'� ��`. �r �p$ 'g o� .rm .�'{�y gQ « `"� .�Y•�.:'L" ^® YV�aIy� M ys.. ie ,M 4p� f Yio C �iy �a of W .. 9� �Q^y.3 ^p� .,rac® ws ®{ M N m L 3 Ii 6. ^y p Xy L a m '�' o ��n#� 70y oZ e ��3j N V ^'•• Ww .tl �p "••• V A j, d L L Ew Nm C8:�0 g' .�r €°'vg �•� o�®�tl K« �Gptl$ .eNO'j�:.a q � 9iAw a cm ®.'"•i 'k1W L.YZ ®.. 1LJ-3 Ws ^4 1 � p ±1 ODOR OL d L OSG d cj pp� C y iC •� '�QOi cM �y O „O®d,6Y LW LgCL O M �LwCO :� N C P •. �9yd+ Lp �.. yY ♦ N O 22.2 C ^ lY • ^N g C G C V C �W�yy � � c .�.y c •'�7 y �u 0� '^ o ,., s rGrr ..-"^ cEO^ Vm yos Y VO_..^q0 3 ♦tV L V q�q OL _ u L'=,u u'� ,. :.`off '�3'N ♦..i, -F:.. e iaru ui co -,N.5 y„ rnn+f oY pd Z; �. oyJ• ow. '�.ri�n iar.W o.q.y♦ w wG bs�Q _v „�r� n� $��' W9 up" ak �Wy ew: .N. ,..'�'L �"t:«dm � .d-_ �•. ct'�r � oo d �a /� 4iy�atmj 6�, iy•O CC{1 �,�P, rg y�♦.wpL� ..'y q� ys nyrOL Y4 ,�.'qGY a Ctf bMS a>;t O C^._.a' r�W C _ O. � L �. G NN 'co „V�q �N O4� Y� NE dq Vaa�w '.CO �gSJO ti ♦�4. +r Vda:. 4Cw�.. yaf YN:Y �C syC nd C_V V�tltltly��C :�L bN p G V : V C 01� 4♦:G�L�Y 4a p.NiLJ N� U4a aN�w'm+p=W �,N dC 00 6C L d �.CY CJ� .VAAr �d5.`r.e' N9 6Y�.N R4i da 41�N 3L4.1 i4 VD :Qv C �Q C fC�Y.W 66�. H ^ r1 Q wr �I mi a► i .�I ! I �I i o� NI M Y V V 9 q O Lcm M dor :. Co �mgCB Cd qW r. Q 7 Vy N p$ a� 't-Cl''' �NNO...� !E^.vii �m Zvi G _ it PI Y ep. qq�y IAq d �C:YQ yy MFpb CR' SY q6 � Tpppyb t Yy �VNy� Og ,ep�� p'�b Z Lp ling C L wrT b`5z _v)m,syn e�rr3 ` a a _ d W�s a I f,j ,Rye y � wa8 I 47 as °1u� N AL oa `D'P O � p Ol .LW TZ �w OYO - dL N N Y p 1 o �a�� ' L gL Y G L GY Yei 66 _ y {C� �p d bc g J® _C r C C YY O W D e 9 p OOOy Y d L q00N�D O $ L11 S Q=�, t d ydyy�� ;-1 + 'V u� pyy d yyNw ,� l�N,p NT ^y 01 —�Qi _� � � NP �aa�. Y. q sOY �w. Yu a wCr -V a�i �9A. �• Y aIOJ V' M �l �L¢I Q�7� L� `.0 Tt- M-2b w�211 dqw/ P- Via. p .OMB r V � a �VL .� 9p Q � G. g111 r $7 w y, «S 1 1 x C.i Y GF RA,1 CHO CUCA=NGA. STAFF REPORT . DATE'. October 1],, 1989 TO: Chairman and Menbers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner'- BY. Steve Hayes, Assistant Planner SUBJECT., ENVIRONMENT�d . .iiSSESSMENT" AND DCVELOPEMENT REVIEW 89-14 ,:pie eve opmer� of two cnanu. ac ur ng ui ings- tata tr,,-'24,00O 'square ,feet on 39,3 �:aGres of land' 16 the Heavy Industrial Drstrict, Subarea 15 of thu Industrial Specific PTan, located kt 12167 Arrow Rc*jte APN, 229,}i21;- 1. ?ROJECT AND. SITE;DESCRiFyofi.` A Action Requested., Approy;-1 vi site plan, grading, and u ng a evat ons-, arty issasnco, of h'egatiye Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:' Nort?i - Vacant; Industrial Area Speeific 'Plan Subarea 8 rGeheral Industrials South - Vaoant; 'Industrial Area SPecifC Plan Subar4a.14 (Gemrai Industrial}. East - Winery and vacant; Industrial Area.Specific 'Plan Subarea 16 (Heavy Industrial) --- West - Vacant, Industrial Area-Specific Plan Subarea 15 {Heavy_In si:r i ai} C. General Plan Designations: - Project Site- Heavy Industrial North - General Industrial South - General I`ndustriai East - Flood Control/Utility Corridor West' - Flodd Control/Utility Corridor D. Site Characteristics: Cur�ntly, an; office building and storage buiTdingwi'tiF related Parking areas exist on-site. A nadority of the site is''Usaad for manufacturing and outdoor storage of concrete storm drain pipe, No significant, vegetation exists on-site. 11(i Ili N t�l 1 F R£PDi?'t dN�N,G � TSSY�N, STAF , 89�14x� AM� 89, of Lions: er. of Num er ac ded * P��atcul acesfir`ed parking �� Type fgdta e: � 19 17 52 of: se off 7 office lllUo4 ftnufeGturing iiareh+use far" riew Sat' apprav besting td3n9 4v Ing t Gant is t,4rirsg tat ng cted The app . cast, maVA. " ear s,c6P Ggnstru:. p, fin_.-emu ct-ion pfe a dry st and an pp tci 1din9c s 4r; a# ansis i°the constr, s,Uaree, "the dry to base•. 'The crag r mateirlal pint ,s �1a2�: feet. GanGre 4n cala kisting access pfrant°g s; Of %etmansard of� co bAsteuiWng� 'enter of the site 3 turfing d near the c oppsed mannf retoGat fr�ewiy and proposAa to roA Route. the pevare orti4n roxtmitY ta.:• the sauthwesthAs begn atom isin atoSe Aof ;uA9rsds►9 the,freeway onGern the $ite i artance isible from d this , far tIA since te, the the mast v addrE0e rooflint raised prraw ld�ng licatnt has to tha6, has, ,been Of used* the Afrnm gr 1s thg.,:roof, rto was, ';ohg expanses stre Goncre. this tipn to AraVidin9 building;,.. seG p°r roxlma elY 3"l 1 ro f�'line« s the op ►ittaa Of ident scai f tat Vf t}n. Pu9ust g$ e ,AraeCt n.Reviewviewed B pe fN e 4e e n o t� viingevisionas papa Oar be i#ss esl d the Gattn►e ('PICh $han td y �( shalt! �. tlunar,,instea ofy line• the aAAlica. . aM the trees}the vtesir p��P. .selec'� d by bited fiat the clang on the sAieterigties $xhrw of Weak ch�rac itiana� tt�e sa Of pr vi dal gait t4 the yes ' Should f be Site from tt►e, ius curves eri+ te�t with tad n A lame i ar s:aped ant h dry cast bilthia e A Of prav{ded usbi�. Seri shrtuhs a annual color' Jude ever�3 hout4 e, tee low pro sr✓� 'i :.. 1 I\ O�R-R'E: ON - 11 Yv 'CT' " Iff, TA ul ILE T I Si A i a I.a PLANNING ,6`0MMISSION STAFF REPORT` ; DR 89-14 - AMPAC October 11 '1984 Page E< Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking ; Spaces Spaces of Use ,Footage Ratio Required Provided Office _: 4,195 _. ..1%250 17, 19 Manufacturing 26,000 1/500, 52 52` Warehouse 74162 1I,1000 7 7 Total 7 T"7 �b II. ANAUSIS• A. General: The applicant is requesting :approval for now- co_nstruct,ion of; a dry cast manufacturing buildi-rg totaling 21,200 square meet and an op en air "'cage"'shop totaling 41800 square feet. The dry cast buildingiis"primarily const►icted of metal with a concrete base. Thii cage shop consists of a Metal mansard roofs consistent in color and material with the proposed' manufactuying';building. The existing access point is proposed, to be^ relocated near the center of the site frontage along Arrow Route. Since the site is in close proximity to. the,'Oevore Freeway and Arrow Route, the; importance .of., upgrading the 'southwest portion AIL of the building (the most visibWfrom the freeway) has been stressed, The applicant has addressed this >concern by providing concrete from ground to the roofline for `this portion of the building. Also; the roof has :been raiRd approximately 3-1/2 'feet in this section to-vary long expanses of identical flat roof line. B. Design Review Committee: On August 3, 1989, the Committee ENi-el, Weinterger, Coleman) reviewed the project and 1 recommended £he following revisions:. ; I. Columnar evergreens (such as Popular or Cypress trees), instead of Oleanders, should be provided along the west :property: line. The spacing,shall depend"on the species selected by the applicant and the growth characteristics exhibited, for the purpose of_ providing additional screening of the site from the regional trail to the west. 2. Landscaped planters with radius curves should be, provided along the dry cast' building perimeter wherever possible. The palette within the planters should include evergreen shrubs and annual color of j low profile. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 89-14 - AMPAC October 11, 1989 Page 3 3. Provide a slope planting ,plan for, the section of the site that abuts the freeway'for- review and approval of'the City Planner. 4., A chain L link fence should he provided for safety purposes around the interim detention basin, whether located on the site or within the Scqthern California Edison 'right-of-way: 5. The architecture of the proposed dry cast building should be revised to not exhihit a pre-engineered Took. . A. -kinar finish and rounded corners were recommended as possibilities for enhancement,_ On September 21, 190, the Comrittee (RgMel;, 8lakesley, Kroutil) reviewed the -revised plans and recommended the following, revisions; 1. The mansard materials shall be of., a soft; gray color. 2. A mansard overhang shell- be reduced in ,pitch as tC ar,pear as a less obtrusive element to the building. 3. The southwest portion of the building f�hall be upgraded to include elements such as, but not limited to,1; Aifferent varietles_:of meterials and/or colors, and a variation of roof 'heigfif as seen from the Devore Freeway. 4.. An ;additional landscaped area shall be.,i0c uded along the southern boundary of the project site. The design of the planters,and location of trees shall take into- account . the;- permanent drainage' facilities required for proper drainage of the site to the future Day 'Creek`Flood Control Channel,.- The applicant then revised the building elevations' and �. landscape plans based on the aforementioned issues, The Committee (hlcNiel, Blakesley; 'Kroutil) reviewed,the project on October '5, 1989 and recommended approval subject to =the following conditions: L, The material used on the southtmst portion of the building shall be tilt-up concrete with .a scored finish. 2. All 'concrete areas shall :be painted to -match the ' eave or mansard material (a soft gray color}, PLAPi ING 0111 lISS14N STAFFREPORT OR 69-14 AMPAC October 11% 1989 Page 4 3. The base of the entire building shall be poured-in- place concrete:` 4. Substantial reveal 1Aes shall be incorporated. on. s; the concrete (southwest) portion *f the building,:-._',` C. Technicai Review Comaitte.:z On August 1, 1989, the crmnittee reviewe ra d the p . ec dada ermined that,,with the recommended -' „tandard conditions of approval, the project is consistent with all applicable -standards and ordinances. On September 28, 1989, the Grading Committee conceptually approved the ,project after.. redeivving documentation from the San Bernardino County TransportatSonfFlood Control Department that the existing retention basin will provide adequate drat:'age in the interim, p:ior' to construction of Day Creek. D, Environmental Assessment; Part I of the Initial Study has Been'camp eted y e applicant. 'Staff has completed Part c of the Environmarital Checklist and found 'no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project.; The San Bernardino County;, Flood Control District has determined that additional mi;tigationlretardation of flows to the unimproved-portion of Oajy Creek Channel, is not required for this project. therefore, an interim basin fac'ility.wiil_ not be required, Southern California Edison permission t;; continue to use the existing unimproved retention area is' required. If the Commission concurs With_staff findings,,,-then issuance of a Negative Declaration Would be in order. III. RECC ENDATION: ,tdf' recommends approval and issuance of a Negative Decla`ration for OR 89-1 through adoption of the attached r Resolution. 'J tful' 4, B d Te Cit Tanne -, J BB;SN:mlg Attachments: Exhibit V* - Slte Utilization Exhibit "B" - taster Plan Exhibit "C'I -Detailed Site Plan Exhibit"Il0,11 - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Grading Plao Exhibit. aF" - Building Elevations for Dry Cast Manufacturing Building t= Exhibit ":G" - Building>Elevations for Metal Cage Shop Building Resolution of Approval Afte �t. J r _ t: � CY Uri a ,i 13 rl ffl] im L - - fl 1 ♦.r+e 0 ITy OF RA I�4I�I /'��I�CCt��+�Ct4Apyll��t NGA l� �} S L �'Cr.•S.�b'y'$�7L VAY G. ✓4-- �. EXHIBITI: SCt�I.E: o {� --- t ? 71 IJ I J I ;c ��'�;t..*}rrx�+ atfiaa r#mil tit?�Pa A#aa ae qs R" 4 ri i f I M r j ILM F ZTx OF MONGA 'ITEM. PLANNINc,DI.MIONFXH IT. 7 , MUM'ACTiMIQ �'.. 1 — 00 co r.rrr r, 1 -I Y Of RA'14 COCAFviONGA rrEM;., 4;,•J�{ P ,AN1 hF�.'DMSION I7TX.I c�e�o i¢ { k (o ' r^lvtr$tc ha. ExIIEI"r.. c-1"SeAf;:. F 4i.e god feu r.t i { 1� f Fit yeu,® �w�bwnq c j r Eu I �� { � MMdJFaaTUM10 r... LC M1..w+......M1•r.y.. •....� f(((( T rr �JUp'Mmq v y r W.y,.,.AC�iWb M , :'T' Or- I i'� f+ �t3't AMONGA. rMM. DR QT ICISION F 4MGQc'TAiIR.d'l.],7[A.G✓.��c'F'r� � `t Original Poor Quality i. L..� , + I I �r ,; It '� �'�Win,em�eir.+ra♦* 1 i Qnl-'A itl` [ 77 o wAw+eiaTuww.csww I � 4S� « P�1/1UO rLAY1.l1TA RMtYwW. t 0 wua�foawa.4 Ammery 1t uwm..aatuv�o �araw.00 wpnr r~. fS�6 � I.1r1_d IT C OF NCH CUCAMONGA TEEM; D R PLANNING-I3T!iTISIOIiT Lr Ml&U,- PIG,, A,-) EX�dd3TT:�D-p" SCALE: �. G �f\OP � 'P /�`�l r~r a ._...... w..ng . . I �. }y.gyPPCM11/WD . ,1.. S1 ems'-_ ..........-wow... ®�r •.1+;tt. MQm. 1 � .PpyPO'flMfA9 yl / •v.fl •wYMI'1 ll g. i m _ -! -- -- --- � A M P. S. x s.{y OF nl.."'g.=a k k �.T•C N A ' � 6 tin St1��n SC�I�r•) �� . C 'LALvi�ING'D SION '1CMF— L��d EXHIBi l;"D-ate' SMAyE: t-� i• Original f'oor ( uaftty l r. .�_ •�R1 tL r. i I .// T1W / r " •''/�~ I =~ e` s{7(i_i I •.r I=r'r�. L'i' ' I t L.f..rF I j','LjI ,��•°Ls�if�� `+"y� J�`�'1N��'�. ' ~ 1"t' J '" "'y �, ��I' I�L �� t r �'('� .t .4. •max---�,,. •---�..�•�,.- � f�� I/t �';,S51"11 I� a .w. .y. y,n• � .,s /. t.��... ,,S 1i} ,�j E Z is ..,� _t 4 1 is l`�r4�~,.J� S ��I=•.�+�= "`1.,.. `�-->'"'—�•.,•4 i"-�s^¢t� - 'Ft�`�` wt _ 4. =x CTTX or- N t)^CUCA141t NGA Pr. C'jDgQ £:` radf Pie Original VOur �I�c;racy � b-CCT♦ �AICYi �. �/^:.- Z u tIA t�1 ' .� !j �f` i tip• Al`.'»..r s_�" r'4 ttr./�., '�,�""' "..—'`m'_�^. � � 1��• ill{L�'�'tJ � s Lf .I�• t v l i Y. �5`• {\_})y-r(,' / 1"�t. �y .�• c m .dam __ � S�` 'P� �Y•' Rim •J�•"...... awsr,.r Z6 -Taw s. &/G'ro" R /CCTIDN G: ~"wrto t H or- PLANNING 17 ION 'Y 9.__�rnd+ PIS M:dd re h n EXHIBITrr-- o SOLE. r, f Orig`na1 hoar QvalttY I ; NE€l3 r`� _ Cp, } ��W r Mimi; _ x _'tu�v. ._. c .•e— 'ate .ate �e-,�.. ...r «aaw...a 11 1—• eaua...r raw.a y OF ItIFVC", GijCAMONGA Mi. DR j?9-f y PLANNING DIMIONS, ty;•,- SCALE: �`V'"� bcrl.,) r �C� tt�di Iruuf f"iO'H "iy 1 € ,j !• -� �1tK�c j �Cul� "�1Y/ - ' .._`� � _. .. �I ' ,�jyC'kT� '�y, A M + tJ1 4 >��'�`iy=SI •1,I 1 J. �� '7-�� i I .ice � u.. }- �,,.,------Ei'� ! S 1 J v/�! 'i 11 1�p ��j t�'�^� �•�^,gym;.((( �i� `. _�r'1 _� .-_. _.s it tIl1 1 � 1 INr,G+ +��1 \ ♦ i�> �w:s, ° < < �,�,.., �;ay{"Yt-iSR"�'� :� -• v�- ~ /j r,�~t� s-="'n�'i""ram-'.._. ,... w..rw ,tliyltfi r.nw r.: � �`..�wtr.r W WYr.t Maf�i..:.Y. tftYN...� • No lz Ir Ty OF RA -ryy ,��y} �4' ��gg��{��.��++¢¢ppa�y�*� s�t9. NIN 1j4'�Er7lolq- SCALE: jq i� A�ISL7677�.. �o tro'aff - iac Ions s'cY rtr srir , C ` 1 a it II i; Ir ,� 'IMMITA4MOq 5b �A1P � in /pp(rp:j��j�{[}} 4 y``/^r�{�faaV s/,��@@;{�[y *ry��y ■pry../p� ��y�s�{� (�\) !�1/aw� (� PLAIV1�Fi C.D €Cjo nlIBM IT-1 SCALE: /> ,�r �/ k � r- i r Y M gQil[R3V'IM2 (�Aa�MA"£.�i�CsR, sv�waa 0 A b y R40IIOII�'{!il �L ��6V A�'4�t#1 r;T- y-OF-RA'-VCPtf3 CVCA MONGA . IPLANf41MG'l-XIISP01�T t'a'E144:1}f�' EXHIBrr. F-9"* SCALE:., t f I r 1 Moo m COD)Do ivr w,. l____-- -�� C EA695T Im LtoMLc1vommITY i a* "PiL�.1IN�PsG O . In l fritBi`fs " r+ SI.F: .f - 17 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CU,CAMONGA 'PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT' `REVIEW NO; 89-14 FOR TWO MANUFACTURING BUILDINGS TOTALING 26,000 SQUARE FEET ON , 39,a ACRES OF LAND IN THE HEAVY MUSTRIQL DISTRICT, SUBAREA •I5 OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIi, PLAN, LOCATED' AT 12167 ARROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN _SUPPORT THEREOF. APN, 229-121-15. A. Recitals, (i) AMPAC. Inc. ''has filed` an application for the approval of Development Review No. 89-14as described ire the title of .this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject'Deve ment Review request is referred to as "tw application", (ii) On the,llth',v;f October 1989,L the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga cont,)cfj)d a meeting on the applicatior-P.nd concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) A71 legal pr`et'0iquisites to the adoption' of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, AOL NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by:'zhe Planning'Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby:s.Fecifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part : of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence'✓presented to this Commission during the above-referenced fleeting on October 11, 1989, including written and oral' staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a.) The application applies to property located at °12157`'Arrow Route with a street frontage of 521.81 feet and lot depth of 235002 feet and is presently improved with.two buildings and.-elated ,parking areas. (v) the property to the north of thei subject site is vacant, the 'property to the south of that site consists of vacant land, the property to the east is a winery,and vacant, and the property to, the west is vacant. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific'findings of facts set forth, in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: k r I. PLANNING COMMMISSIONCRESOLUTION NO, October 11, 1909 Page 2 1 (a) That the nroposed project is consistent � ,q th the objectives of the, General Plan; and (b) That the,proposed use is in accord with the objective of { the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and [. (c) That the proposed a,�st is�•jn compliance with ea0i of the i applicable provisions of the Industris; pecift-c Plan; and. (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto,;will not by detrimental to the public health, sa.f%zy, or welfare, or materially injurious to i 6perties or improvements in the vicinity. ,I j4. This Commission herd y finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed.-And considered in coy-pliance with the California Environmental Quality Act `of 197T and,.,,future, this Commiss;,ion hereby issues a Negative Declaration., 5, Based upon the fiWp9s and conclusions sex forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application'subject to each and every ,condition set forth >below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto- and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) , Landscaped planters with radius curves shall be provided along the. dry cast building perir%i,ter. „- wherever possible. The palette within the planter shall 'include evergreen shrubs and annual color of low profile. The planters and palette shalt be indicted on the detailed landscape/irrigation plans whk'�;shall be approved prior, to 'the issuance of- { buildin permits. 2) A minimum 8-foot high chain link fence shall be provided for safety purposes around the, interim detention basin on the Southern California Edison property to the west. Said fence shoulH be installed prior to the issuance of building permiti-� for the new buildings on-site. 3) The Devore Freeway right-of-way adjacent to the project shall be landscaped in accordance with a master plan for the entire segment of the freeway within the City as approved by CalTrans, the City Planner, and the City ;Engineer. However, if t!`, Alk r u PLANK NO 6Mix MION RESOLUTION N0. OR 89-14 AMPAC INC. October 11, 1989 Page 3 Cal Trans will not allow the incremental construction c an of this freeway landscaping with this project, a cash payment in-lieu of construction as a ce �ribution to a future compre' nisive project shal3 be' made to the City prior to the issuance of build'tppg permits. - The" developers responsibility shall ,be limited tq the area east of the east edge of th4 first travel lane. 4) An additional landscaped .area shall be, provided along the southern boundary of the project site. The design of the planters and locations of trees shall to 61 into account the permanent drainage facilities required for proper drainage of the site to the future Day Creek Flood Control Channel, Said landscaped area shall be shown on the detailed landscape/irrigation plans, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) The mansard material for the dry cast building and "cage" shop shall be of a soft gray color,. 6) The mansard overhang on the dry cast building shall be reduced in pitch as to appear as a less obtrusive element to the building, 7) The height of tWsouthwest section of the building shall be raised)) to three and one-half feet, consistent with,che change of-horizontal distance.td the mansard matierial. 8) The material used on the southwest portion of the - building shall be:tilt-up' concrete with, a scored finish. 1) All concrete�(f�,areas shall be painted to match the eave or mansard material (a soft gray color). 10)- The bas,-lof the entire`�.tilding shall be poured-in- place concrete. 11) Substantial -"reveal lines shall be incorporated on the concrete (southwest) portion of the building. 12 A slight _ g return shall be _provided for the roof variation to give a "finished" look to the building. i a PLANN�hr- `coMMISSION RESOLUTIOR NO., DR 89-14;. AMPAC IPIC: October;11, I989- Page 4 13) The chain ;ink fence along the west property line shall include slatting:to .aid in screening outdoor storage from view of the future regional trail along Day Creek. Said slatting shall be a. weather= resistant material, - t Fnaineerfnc Division i 1) Arrow Route street improvements Shad be designed' :! per the approved City plans for the vertical alignment over Day Creek Channel and the East Arrow master plan storm drain. Improvements on Arrow Route shall include 18 feet of pavempnt on the north side of the street centerline.. 2) Install the necessary catch basin(s) and lateral(s) on the south side of Arrow Route for future connection to the East Arrow master plan "stom drain. Provide a temporary connection to discharge these flows to the. project Site, 3) A drainage acteptamZa agreement sraA be recorded prior to building permit issuance. 4) A public stormm drainage easement shall be provided parall,iling the 1-.15 Freeway along the northwest Property tine from Arrow Route to the West property line prior to the issuancR «`r"6ui;,ding permits. 5) - The following shalt be obtained from Southern California Edison- prior to the issuance of building permits;_ a) A Permanent private storm drain easement along the north side of the railroad easement from the project West property line to Day Creek, in favor of this proprty3 and b) Temporary permission to discharge drainage from: the Protect site to the existing unimpruved retention area within the Southern California T:4ison easement. 6) Construct a local storm drain from Day Creek Channel to the project site on the north side Of the railroad tracks within the Southern California Edison easement. ,i r� f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 89-14 ., PMPAC INC. October 11, 1981 Pag+S 5 Anhk a) Tb-""design of this facility shall be based .on a Final Drainage Study and approved by the"City Engineer prior to the issuance of ,ng permi�:sR b) The design of on-site drainage facilities sha11 be rsviewed by the City Engineer for compatibility with the Darr Creek system design prior to Issuance of.gradinq permits,. c) Surety 'shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satL4factios of the City- Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the permanent facilities upon. the City"s completion of Phase IIIA Day 'Creek Channel improvements-:prior to the issuance of building, permits. - 7) Permits will be required froR ,Southern' California Edison' far.work within, their,l ghta-of-way. 8) The existing overhead utilities (electrical, except for the 66KV electrical) along the project 'west boundary be undergrounded from Arrow Route to the first pole off-site south of the. project south j boundary prior 'to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. I 9) ' The existing overhead utilities (electrical, except for the 66K" electrical) on the project side of Ar;,ow Route' shall be undergrounded from, the first pole: offosite east of the project Past boundary to-'` the first pole west of the midpoint of the combined Cal Trans and San. Bernardino County ,zlaod ,Control District ;easements (or existing termi►lus if closer), prior to public improvement acceptance Or occupancy. whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the difference between the undergrounding cost for the utilities on the project side of the street minus those on the op.aelite side of the street from'futura development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 10) An in-lieu fee as contribution ta`the future j undergroundirg of the existing -overhead 'utilities (railroad communication) on the opposite side of the A.T. & S.F. railroad tracks shall be paid to the f i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION: NO.`' `DR 89-.4 - AM'PAC INC October 11, 1989 Page 6` City prior to the issuanm,,of building permits. The ,._ fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of the combined Ml and S' E easement widths to the east project boundary (Ml feet), i 11) The "masonry Wall along Arrow 'aoute shall only-- -- enc/:oach' on ,the public storm drain easement as approved by the City Engineer Landscaping within the public easement,shall be approved by the City Engineer. t 6. The Secretary to, this Commission shall certify to t.ie adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER. 1989. PLANNINr COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST.• Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary ;Df the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify thst the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by-the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamongak at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission he'd on the 11th day of October; 1989, by the following vote-to-wit; AYES: COWIISSIONERS.: NPES. COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: { I h •r .Q�e`,'�„+a'ua`=y,i co. �';�I �.4.=c Y�.Ycr � ZS—m t'o^uY. a.«P '�•.'. #...$. dcWo::. a.'_uri''4 Orf V f+p� +per •� 9 �' O.,'. r6y�Ypy Y p10« tl ^Cu� uS<Yr � f�qd `y Oa pV.O �. 3W C « GRYN¢P $ B. V n5c3 •N�' �� d OVj yV�C �. TY ;..NnsI tl... VC\. Y ��L.' � .. fCy.'it gS� O�'L#M 4 # Y L GCO Y«p Y�U.p YL6a yu �oNS �", QQ g `'ers: �3 .#.uxu6uwu S n_Jo y oU. uVa C i O2•' 1C> �p CP �OaN O 7MN� Cr~Mw N�C.'• �M`.43 L' CpCp�Y'0� q+TC CCp Oprq bll��' 4 CN p.. aee T �+N Q � &�O v y roc,, a ^a. �p o.p .Y Qy V L ur~V lY o' 04 5-Z F� � ...T+� aaca.5o wg■¢c�.�` is �ayFo a w _y s W �� '^' Cu OW:_rrrYYC�CCVY®. OA 'V Q> • - � �!{1 \W`y'$pry� \V W tk VyG u C 4 Y C l��ryt��..Y 6 e>C•�dC�r y 1l Y �N C Y V� �� %Y >� F `Or 0'M O •�o `O Q'•tYS�'t0ar1•i '', U 10'' �. �CtlC yyY w.L LLY,:ItS t�: pppa�.' _�C•p"aM�Ua, 6�V 9aOf NL.Y�•p. I�OCi.YwOLyM 't NF My ip�� aCa6. V a rq� pep( •g + t7l ��+�[e o��+[��.qwq ccwe � �g , � �.. k'�4 N"YYYYYY,► p� Aft W C a O C T� LL B M O V Y C Eye ,r.�.0 C�V pN D ..Y�.•C,sai L .YY#him 0 its e� Al -ob im ON y �u t- .AN4t J it HIS y/ qY9 pY LYN .LYMQ «G�}Cy7 V^+ qq .cr.....q_ `Y'p^. Y242 o an� c W "_^_ t_=� s=�� '0. as �` .5 N+ °` ss ■■ n Y a�q s -5 ^C �N + L Q gLvsis y.=y� -a'°�� o.nIN M4L �► T CCC C q CyqNY�p i Cp.!O uQKN �.C1 �ppYY.M� '.^tqt.•LO O.vuq 6G 1 Ma9Y Op !n¢�, C,>gY V w'Y IS Y. 46 .1 Y3" „""'raNs"L� E'$ ^ae. /��N`"OO LH_gY ZZ"T R� ,Y_C > Nq aP C� N� �.../ OI Ga—n q_ N q 9QY .r E�' '..i 82 �yg�p YU= OCNY uwY �y�pN^ +M o■,.E pY� Na GCC J9�Nf n. NC—� NyM^:Y IId��.,. :^uNY aaaY dY M0"ZI b YN^�� 1V Y.l�y_1 $tea` NL yN.N{n�W�� M'bN ipqo. w2MMgt. 1?" O yG q o q a U. „o y O C q+A C U R N y r n } s,aW aft, -$^EM aG ;' 6>fl.._�.� Y v �..�+� -qg" 4.,} .. .q o`vuY� u� a '72 co s au :.c..Y.c �� h °ZI�a ggYtY�.Y� rY �u � W6{Ccµ5. !9} cc1 _ua CQ 11��L7 �tl 6Y RY'.1 S., I.Gn HYMN NS. x� P ��K.N �C..G@'WC.�$ GC 6'.E EA: `wa mob- . +C 6..oG� ?� OMc ��.p �! q V1yy�YO Nu M,CYGYN' W Yff 1.K @...� Y. ztJC ^L^ �. '. nY+ ram` fM— • sari«�: ,. Op YN1 q" fy. oa Lily �1 Q ljy:- 3pt! Nj 9..N. HpW zppe q+MGu"Te., �LM� - A'eLl a., v ■d q j V —80 e uy s ^ wC YtQ RLdyy' iNl rg�. J 40, 44 wk'vv«: puN $�iy 61 �15$$�.SC •. gLg¢j.T�Ll�1 '4$6` MysatlyYVM�.. .WQy -u��K N yiMw..�c «Y d as RU 3� j§'O V H. C^ `-cT. P1 2 Ci^�yd Y C p e'"c E yw.:t'�"'~ Nw' _ ��.p. ►.9 °$ Yv�-6 yY• ra mw"wa— Spy@ � iq�-lpcy cG 6qs d>, .� w��. C C C >� V >� tl Y 0•►4 ^ It.. :r+�N`�` � •—rim e'i,4 .�^ q+xex' Sy� y f g'Cggq?w 311�~ -calmr`r q. �1—�.MC c�1`.A N9 ..rK �.Mtl� c� YyO ?p fi c at ... u p a.uc aL •e v'�"y L i>a� Glus !l aaG �N iJ. dt�fl V~ qya Ormp^Na ye'` CCf.VC W �C4L.. b�l 'y"ao 50 " oc 0� o� .n '�r—+o+•�. o.su$ 4 +P � QN9 W Ls L� LLp—�NpO. �4LY dNLU V + �c C ai y S Ma yRM—O CO G N L+u �..�qq � �u�N d q M.9 O O O V.N��N try 4 4^•.y N C . T d s+d .. .� �i Ndg4 Vd0r =G trey. iC y ON%V 4 C V4Z is- �'g� 'u� caw. .YQ �N`o`o►:^' }`r$ �A3�� c5 =�Y^ mac. p 0 q a l q..^ + < ,p3 �yOl dw L nrr:C. •"L a mrry. QCO . q Y M N D O d O r C t a_M y y L�yp M O H �9�J N O U C{� VVV Ln ^qC..4L y,+{7�npNo aVC L. O—p aY RN H L �yL -:C aa�d pLQO owy yF LC —GO. Cn S VIS ..O N.,t yisvdNLGr Lq��l4a O .V OOLM "G"':Y•d U I�— YN ��+ 00 K «dcu i`�.04a6N- �.L�....:�QoS{p iN�ga�y CyprF q,VLd 1a.�1 ~I�yy QdL ^a4 p3 t�y y�ryaGq VQ pY.. �y Ng� L�.. aN/L'•y �.LwW dr � pr O CWapiL�•"�a C.^..N q.. CC=. C +�.. Nq w p w•y� y -, OQ11w C •�. a. S^e?�Q a.4 q d m•LII'.3� 4�.. p.+�ly p q Y. ^p�Y�N •i y i L • C 6 V G L L M 6 R N;Y^O gN p CC u ^ G Y O o dy CY,�CmG � � O.L LiyeY iaps�� 0�+� g G A� �ayw `4 d V N d`I �Y $N Y O� MIZE fin. s� -:mow nN. yam a��L �c oc u ,� da�dc` 'c� - aon -w.L.o•�r� Pw ws• pQ '53 L oai sLa a a 4d�`aa¢�.7r.+i m$ c^n fM �N a p+i �Sq$�Q 50 �e �� o♦q� CC . �r ag'^ uSy2.1 QR�' F't c�•�r 'sgcu agLvo ms 5 ry ra r"om EX X. N«v: v at ae[.G ^+ lI qm M r- oot((1� { � .ycMtl L!� . .GO V:'R^ ' M~ 9� ^ �ss C'.rb� tSY tl N,:N^L wM MORE^ At y.• ��a aM.r.g�O Y �y O A Y v�•J �YSiN :nt HE .. ^® ^... 1b. I Le m S V 14 W ppipy� L—�N ^ Y 'yS m� 2z.o yyyyL �zt 6i 3i S I.Nr^Y y}ICC�I+Vy Sr msi a � +0 L '.� �PLaGyV S C6 v p y ~pEmmsAL 4N0 iN4i.0 •[ s a:�o.M �L 47 SRO �OMwC.�.. Q6 t - M i rf �. '$ate d✓ yy � H tl C CO.Ci L�■. � 6�" -. i O.O Y M O.r Bait L C .rprl �!a C.g. E.tgu gcg� «~.«^ .�a, ow' c aY j. .o„o wyc; �t Qaaq ��•V c^yg o�.. q,✓n y�( 0 ; b. d u'y q L C j Y f y L V q qski N Y✓T ^ V^y 1Y N✓iN I�I N. yI L 4.M r w s. g y y d n � ��0 OY�yYyY 'ticR H �0�� OOI�W✓ a�wYC T �y� Sr : MYN ✓r C� �g OYY 7. M✓5�•� 'arti dq ugE.��- N^gd CAA 0.�Y00 Waq $IE -s V! CY.m OG'dV T =AS KHC auC&4 wCL .J S,5 YI°Yu4u rA aw O rSM 30 56cq ^aoo'... oqj [s�;t T f �C✓C `�Ca. od$e �' r�.p pNb C a N. T Y 'U"Y WE q A �.a^Oi y9yY�✓ Q33 C�9p�q g L If OQo 5[T` 6yLdLKQ Y^Hp t +v 6Ly � y I TCi1 Na� YY,p idO�p�dII YgQQ¢S' y H -O Cw OCG Nd Ar $$y CY . S 60r !a.�L Ow CLO M'� CW ugao P .O Y V Tp AYr�. O YI YOI MY N✓ M G^ 81 N Vp // S. ugiCNgY _ Q✓ CAM p.. �Q60 A. 66YK Ly'YmO NM6 Vg1 Alm d,y�Y� T` TOYS' �C 6d:0 N N G.YQ p C I M 111 J_ 453 Y, Y Y Qy C p O 6^� q � C✓O COM+A=� N Os pY�q O y✓yt�.�� C{ dii{,.o ��` AryAi"CO' Y w} y.�p~ uACQ- G yO.M VyA S N9^y�. 3 �� Y. � OV� i4y+l�'�- ✓ fi yY�� N� Ap .' ~Y NWA duS gag, o `�j`(°2� ==yl > "✓CC^o... `A�° i.YHpcl:SN►q^.H.C wO 4 �I�yIy� �SAEE CCOp MYc� Mg� mu pp eat, C 3LO NY . a�[L11 q g O ✓ O�aVy� v p�{ �, '+>OCA + C- N y `✓C �q � M F p T LLwY w f�y(� aa-• ��►.✓ . E C8 �YyL6 N^ a✓ o�1✓`Q MyLj�pp� � Opk`�'� ism t v a$ SS - `OOCy. Op® �yC rC✓Ojl�jjta.�0y97.�0. �H 03 1 E�p �✓ it-QN : GPM- �Vpgp Y:Q$Y 11 10 .r l• S wlo 1 O.$Y$w `.p.0Y i 4p y g ?L y�u 'n.'Laoai`y, uq� aO. vy •Y, coTz— «.a' H'S Q,^ CP WYVN yMw 'yN CM ' W> L �•� Y+G O' 4� C s I9 '. GZ �c • V O. LLz }NN.�� p»L wo t_ iyy a .o`cuya' •ra a VNw aN:�VC3. �4'�r� p� �. ,G+« _ � •� gCwC.Y.> p� or " bO 'cpps v e y d r5. rb ay',• o ,�.. - y■N a c N o �. y Wyyp w.V.A V�uG N �MW� V 4 Y s V 9L Lu N )E A. °'e g.S' $.� Awa S .°�►y M co nrp w V eu"a CC:� �u ,�=�gOp w VB G�uc■C..L V .O�O1a oq A� i � ~Lyu La C'Jw0 ^SOP Y! T 4�QY q� qW V pep—sm: �^ Lw GpY ML tL G.�V RO.V VCCy � 'it-yam V� 9 O•.C. y~! 6w+Lw A« b A�uG`3YC 04 a c Ul VV LOB O) VOIV i� CYV Lc C :Tie/a� �'.y 0*.r:r�+ Z. �C� L6 4 .. YVV..wipi aiz 1:MEMy� ^� V� a g9W V Oy. � Wp �� B,ICd YcpM 46uVyCV . GC CC 10 CCp qq L V C 3 Cf w O V 6 �:V'W M c L ^ ~,a.. Ep+ *�G O! RC.c. a p. X.0 rr--g a �^a' u �.r'�6' :.' v E op t Ia .mac �p a � $ � VA�p �pyq �•' a y�y+$ia anoc4r «��. p:. �y •� v!1!�O L O f .. raj y w. p C lk V:O Vvoll ge py aw w M6 {:� ySy "Co $$Y' 4r fi pRp+x$GYGY ouzo �+av $ .0 ^YY �� y+ r� Qo�4^ 'LOS tl OQ rM �Y cO Y~N� vON Er�.�Ll a='. g� 9� Yg w$.a. N.q.i's' «.� :�.�� $.-Y i C��: pC•A r' ..a�'�E �+�:�� y iv— ^+ _P a � pZ0-3 ZOO a V V M �«sctsr� N �^ Z.e c 'RN To« �t`Zn 4Fi.'�b► ► .� �L9uIa Rs�.. $ x�� pia r7 wY � ppd g WN W 4Y O vw�ia1 @� ►Ii4i K.W� M� I 14, i I L I i ,,r 'Y G.o LG �yy tl ; 9N��Q � t CN MY.V Vim. 4 ZIA I lips q qRA VNb wyi ,41:wcN N $V ww.. G. 4 O4N�GG4 Y'ppt s N« y2 YY wAi�; C� G"6s CVU n+V t-Y Ytl a a«ya eyN� LL ��r «- u[ :,=e�ym � c'c`s,�• r�,wa �' �'L'� ��, ♦Y+.. oy L d. ACN gs:e € a. QM (e�y. CY "A • Os" W! V «Y GY..y NN NMN ^.' L'.'. {2{..9. ...�. ."..`..v�V��.1WSM. �t' La. N Or3 tJi A?L 41.V..r1 .I z; 4t 4p M etz; b", Y1T Cw C I+tl C V g$.f.0i 'ITN �N Y.4r3 KaN �V✓,( 1 a yOr. .ri a�qp� rot p � G �V ^ytr�1 wG.�yl ti* CGyY� 4W Y C i �bbM{�. Y +r� V'� Xil.w NYppA wM j M: s 4 V CQby C ViN -G6 �N NVVO it VWNi AY.: yy2all�. qyyy YWd A'rWw. SY es M 6 pY "�yp C22 C{ qA� MS 4u H= 2; V` %is �� a fig} ,fat 14.131 ,M � N r u+x i' 7E�" 'w '+ 4atJ.. y~� ghYf• a f$j aA`., XY CM C V+i d. gYr a t�qy �.Y � tlN iY $g i� a ` 9 ■ys .� c 9 ":.. "y t� N 72.2y. a " a:C Qyos CY .. Op CLr \V ,2 � �$3 �O pp,N. pia b 1 `o Y M Y9Le AlY .„ v NYA'' fF N YV OY8 G^L N N Y�y C• V Y. L y O � O C�,� ��. V� RA L&—s. Eva tag VYy .Vpp�� yuY p= • o.N y yyyy N? y000:. Y LYE 4 Y YE �C\. �O QV Mph: �f y E _ Y S e C _C i. "� �•VVi�L ��> N C n � �Y. y, nr,, + 4y. ..�C,M Vp Eno^..� a V�Y � �N �"•. CJ.� Q�:M a` .: u� CL QW- a� $�Na »�n3 � �Ss as �� "�: •,;x s� aLIZ; u N av Y u 'ice as Oz „ ter C ■8L SS (V�,C w tQpNN{ yq �re w V r� 0.N42,. tG p