Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1990/04/25 - Agenda Packet
jlj�� qry OF RANCHO ICOQ�IWN rA O C� r -,PLANNING: CCKAISSION J [� AG KNDk Y 1977 ;. NEONESDO } APRIL 25, 1990 T 00 P.M L103 PARK Cv:$?l UTT CENTER ' 9161 BASE 11iiE RANCOO CUC1 CWGA- ;CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allgiare . II. Roll Call Commissioner Chitiea _ Commissioner ToIstoy Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Weinberger III: Announcements IV. Approval of Minutes March"15, 1990 ` April 11, 1990 V. Public Hearings t The following iLam� are public hearfTLgs ini which concerned individuals nsly voice their opinion of the, related project. °.lease wait to be recognized l+y Lthe Ch i rmnn and address the: Q=Ission by stating your nare and' address. All such opinions shail.'be UmLted to 5 minutes per individual for each. project, Please sign" in.,afteh speaking. A, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.,AND TENTATIVE PARC!,:`t MAP 1233 RENSLEY-BUFF LO SIX LTD. - subdivision of UJ8 acres+ of land- into 4 parcels 'in the;General: I•rdustrial District (Subarea 11), lacaGed at the .north*st' corner of 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue '- APH: 229-26248. .• (Continued' from April 11, 1990.) S. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL use!R kk 90-09 INL ND E FE LD11SN P -..A request :to 'establish., ' day, care facility. Within_ an exi'sting) 'building previously ` approped,,for church 'use totaling 16,457 ,"square feet on :2.42 ,acres of,land in the Modium Residential Disteict (on: I 14 !dwel.lin units `� t g per* located °a, the. Barth est hirner. -of, 19th Street` and Amethyst Avenue 7OI414=02 and. 0.3.. A_ C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-26` ` - COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH - A proposal to construct a 14 3501�square foot?two-story building addition (containing , {' 10 classrooms, 2 faculty resource centers,_and. fellowship, s ' hal 1.) "to n existing 11,000' square foot-'church. pro,+ectA s in. a MediVI, Residential District (844 dwelling: units per acre},;-located` at the northwest cort+ert of Deryi?'; Qnd 19th Streets -�APN: 201-221-08. !7. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS.I!fNT.AND CONDITIONAL' USE PE0,IT� I-07, - RANCH TII5,,MINI RY, C N R�.- request,,to estab, !`h a 4,320 `°SquarY foot. church office .and meeting hall for church-related ,gather.I.n.gs in an existing ,industrial-`park in, the General Inddustrial District , Subarea_ 3 of, the; Industrial Specific Plan,• located ,at ,9390 7t' Streetz' Suite'C --AP►i 209-171-57 E. ENVIRONMENTAL ,ASSESSMEN't AND TENTATI+IE :PARCEL MAP 13123•` MISSION LAND COMPANY -'' subd1v1sion ,of .17 73 acres of and into parcels n th GeIndrl rict' a t ,: . Subarea 11 of the-Industrial Spec•ific_Plan9r'(ocated`at the southWes-t corner of ' 5th• Street and T:0falo' Avenue - APN: 229-26343.ar^! 24, yI. Old Busio ess. ' F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND -`DEVELOPMENT* REVIEW 89 12 DAVIES - The development of? Phases II-'and III of :an industrial complex, containing ",six (6..) • in,ustria, buildings tot�aliiig 2Z,940 square feet'on 2 2�acres of land' in ,the General .Inn'striai District, Subarea ,3 of the . Industrial S ecific Plan, locited� on Feron Boulevard, east' of Helms Avenue,;;- APN: 209-031-87 and 88 (Continued from April, 11,, 1990.) dII. Business _ G. ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND 'bEVELOAMENT..REV IEW 89-19 MISSION LAND. COMPANY The development of. 4 warehouse`° bui dings otaling 346,D72 square feet on 17 J3 acres of- land in the General IndustriaY.District, Subarea, 11 of the Industrial, Specific Pla►, located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Buffalo" Avenue - APN:•' 229463-23r said 24.. .Associated with this project Is-Tree Removal Pe-;.mil 9o-01. f H. .M00'IFI:,AT1 N TO �DEVELORMENT REVIEW 8-20 = <MISS10N LAND` COMP NYA request to delete a, specie p anntng condition of appro!�61 regarding .the placerdent `of, building"'Versgs, parking areas along 6th' Street fora previously approved;, master p{an consisting :of, 35 _parcel_s on.:97 96 `acres of land �n the ,r^�}er Industrial and ' Industrial Park: dI2f•thra aDistricts ndistrialnSpccifc K Plan, located b een 4th and 6th Streets and Pittsburgh an .-Buffalo. Avenues. - .APN: 229-263-22 .through'27.. ; 41 l YK a� VYII. D9r@Ct4r�5 id@pOrt5 I REVIEW QF'.LANDSCAPIN6 MAINTENANCE,COSTS WITHIN"ASSESSM NT DISTRICTS Oral'Report J CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-12 -'LEWIS HOMES -: An appeal og. the 'City:;Planne.:r'r ;"detgrminati,on regarding the plaster. surface, for 8uatdings A; and ,Bin :the 'Terxa.'Vista TaWn' Center, located ' at. the northeast `corner` of ,Foo6i''t1 iBgulevard,and'Haven Avenue 'APO. 1077 2I-36, 37 and 40. � r Y.. U.-� omission.Business, $ A. TRAILS ADVISDRY COMMITTEE APPOI'iTMENTS,' , (Continued from` 7_ 90 �t L AMENDMENTTO' TRAILS COMMITTEE REGULATIONS X. Pub1tc Counts ` 'This is, the.ttme and ace, or,the ar p, f general Public ,tom address �t the Camnissfon." Tt&m- to bd'�disoussed.hera are those which'do; i` rtot aiready.appear'on this gganda. " �F XI. 'Adjourn iept : I, The Pianning Carmission has adop� �i��nfnistmtive Regulations that set an 11:P.M. adjourn nt''thih.:.If tterns'go beyond that: '. a . this, they shalt be '`heard only, with the cor'.serit :of. the'. Camiission. tt 7 Z �F t, j t it �L t F � 1 1 A W 1 tf g���yyJJ SV. `l L f Ri gRkJ1Y. {� C7 MAP' .. J!m 'PAR: aeab m>a GP M®- a t V L'F .3 t { t -- Cr. OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT'.� DATE: April 1.11 1990 T0: Chairman afid'Members' of the Planning Commission ' 3 FROM:, Barrye,R.• kanson,.Senior"Civil Engineer BY: Pinq"K q,,:A$OstanV Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 'TENTATIVE PARCEL; W, 12338 - KLNSLEY-BUFFAL . M ,u - V1 s•on Or acres o an " r n parcels: n. the Genera] :l�•!ustrial District (Subarea.11 A,:.]ocated at the northwest corner'' of 6th 'Street,' and Buffalo Avenue (APN 221-262-281,; BACKGROUND: This item was' continued at .the, Narch 28', 199D Planning ones►C—"Tssien�seeting, because the Chi issian was, concernett-than the,unusual parcel' configuration could cause maintennnee�probi ems-andi property owner disputes in the future« . Staff"met with'-•thb%Applicant on„April.4,_ 1"990, where it was decided that- he, should 'prepare. "]eLteti ;explaining; hi.s t,^ reasoning for the requested parcel tines. His explsnayion .letter is, attached. DISCUSSION: The .Applicant dial,;,revise' .the parcel- lines sos:seeihat. ,in response. the CotinissiW s concerns-which are ref tected an�the revised Tentative Parcel Map 'on Exhibit_`- ,The revised parcel.'area s are-al•so shown`on the Exhi6 t. The prevtooas staff re¢ort.esf' FBarch 28; 1990 is attached, for your.reference. The Planning Division' had the folIowing. 'cos nts in reference to "the applicant's letter: :: In (�anufacturing ,uses require 2 parking spaces `per, 1000 square feet of gross floor area. 2. The applicant has-attempted to make each parcel self-sufficient` in terms of parking. In reality Buildings;i, 2A-' and 2B are deficient as calculated at the-2;"spaces per, thousand;ratio.. ; 3. The _revised: parcel map 'is';acceptable�,sub3ect to requiring a ;. (' reciprocal parking agreesssent. Q The reciprocal parking agreement is repired ,by,Special Condition No..l { in the resolution as it was in .the original. rsolution contained in the k 'March 28, 1990 Staff Report. L, IT A ', 1 1 t, . PL.�HHM3�IGCOt�IIS$ECH'�5TAFf,�REPQRT .• a t TEUT PARCEL MAP 12338 KE¢eSLEY-BUFPAlO SIX; LTD. 1 APRIL:25- 1990 ' PAGE"2 „ RECOMMENDA' TOH It'is recOw'enddd that the .Qlanning"Go Ass on consider a npu an elersa is ofrthe"Tentative`Parcel._Mp 12338 '_If after such Const eration, the :Commission can recoRanertd, approvai: �fthen the adoption of.Eha attached Resol utfbn and issuance"of 'a Negai i�s'�Oecl arati on 'aoul,4 r° be appropriate r; Respectfully,%s¢b�itted, ,j Barre C Hansom Y Senior Civih'Engineer.' ` BRH:PK:aiw r Attachments: _ Revised}TentatFive t93p ( xh)bit "p►") Applicant's Letter March,.28, 1g90 ditaff Report r _ =fr Resolution and Recnded',Conditions.of Appratal E �� . tt _ } i I Y r •1 a OX e I f• ' IL o •a Al se► � � i I�1fi lii► i1 m 09� I I III'Iil ellll it 1` LU x lz • II I I, - �TTT�iTP1LLUJIWI f I III III I III gag I►' ilili IV I111 I11 1 �+ IIIIiII• 1 ;1►~ I l rr:Ill eel n lII I♦`rI 'I it I E N S L EY At-U VCORPEtrtAMN KE I"Mar%ER. .f�•E.ill:Eni. KFln f` c4. �rA t.S. Barrye R. Hanson E +LE `"'�LEJ1K1�� April 13, 1990 Senior Civil Engineer The City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road P.O. Box 807 r�r Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Tentative Parcel Matti' #12338 Dear Mr. Hanson: This setter shall serve as a supplemental explanation of our k request f1jr parcel-map approval.. Background The buildings on this property were designed,.primarily as research and development technology'facilitiesV th four (4) per thousand parking: Construction was completed in September of 1983. As'you: may be aware the demand for R&D facilities in the Inland Empire no lc-�ger exists." An extensive .marketing program undertaken over the past two (2) years has yielded no tenants The 'property,was acquired by a now partnership, Stenton Buffalo Partners, in December 1989. New Marketing Program Stenton Buffalo Partners is taking a"fresh n-vi approach to the .ma -Q rket in of these g g e buildings which'has t2:L_ far produced g s a high degree of interest from'both prospective"leasing tenants and companies that want to own their facilities. The new program'is as follows: 1. Market Bldgs., 1, .2A and 23 forlease•or for "sale�tp, industrial. and light manufacturing users. 'This use is allowed in- this district and requires 1.5 per-thousand �a,. square feet for „ -king. 2. The current owners intend to retain ownership:*f. SIdg. .3 and offer it for leaass. to' lebor int®nsi a ueere s sailar:'" to the recantly ,compl tad Sears fieility 'on`the"south side oVSixth Street-across•fr* this build3nejl These users 4enorilly seek facilities with ve high,paYking `. ratios 5215 LANKERSHIAI 0LV'D NORik HOLLYINOOD.CALIFORNIA 91601 010.761.0020 yfr L• ® KENSLE ° Mr. Barrye Hanson April 13., 1990 Page 2 Bldg. I js..locat on on Parcel 4 which contains approximately four,hundred (4001-parking •stal•'ls. �aldg.. 3 was designed ,to add a second floor which provides for the flexibilit."to increase the building sJU6 and' still allow, a very high parking ratio and •adhere to the. use , requirements for`-this-:district. Proposed" Parcel 'Line Locations The parcel line locations-were have given,careful ` consideration from several aspects. However, the parcel'map has been designed to primarily satisfy,th,e requ�;rements of, most real;estate lenders and purchasers. Since each parcel may�b. 6 financed with different lenaeis, each building was given enough land to^satisfy 'its own parking requirements°`for its intended`use. Each building''has ownership accese to a public right-of- way. This, is a requirement, in most`citbg�# in California and a :requirement,that nearly all real estate lenders insist upon. As a. result,''.Parcel '2 has•more parking than Parcels 1 and 3. Business,Park Man:1 emend The Sixth Street Business Park will be managed by`.'the applicant Stenton Buffalo Partners through. a'dccument recorded against all the parceis. as a Declaration of Restrictions, Grant, of Easements and Maintenance Agreement.. (Attached herein as' -an" exhibit.) The owners of each parcel will ba required,to, acknowledge and. agree to abide by the rules and regulattonu of dais document prior to purchasing the property.:, This document provides for all anticipated issues of ownership in a multi-ownership business park. ThL9 document contains provisions for common area maintenance, utility assessments;; architectural control, parking control, common ingresa and egress,;signs'-and .a` multitude of other issues.` �'J SLE KEN ��. f Mr.,f3azr+,{e,Hanson YkV'ti 13, 2990 J Py19L ,3 IL Tztese types,'af multi.o�rnixraiiip=business parks t ei coramont throughout 2ifornia and' as <you can,'see'-the 2egp]icaiit'has givEn. the planning. of ttiis,bttsiness.park..very eakefill 'ce�asid$rat on. questi Iyau,shoulct hazfie'.eX: further ons; p3ease don�t.'hesitate toy:contact mg. ,, '�ineere3,Y. STE G HUFF A'PARTNERS ' JXL, 933 cc:, Nick Qri.ti \ , Richard Stentori } David Maori'- i it ,r J i5l r ,r -- GITY OF RAW CEIO CUC4MONGA STD' REPORT i a� f DATE: March 28, 'log0," Jai TO: Chairman and Members,of the Manning Cortmnission FROM: Bar rye R.' Hanson,, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Ping Kho, Assistanti Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL' MAP 12338 - KENSLEY- -subdivision o 4, acres o ate in —pa rce.ors n e �General 'Industrial District." (Sub` a:'-11), located at the-,, thwest corner of 6th, Street 'and Buffalo Avenue IAPN` P29-262-28) } I. PROJECT" AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action ' proval of. tfie`propdsed Tentativp,Parcel Map as shown on, x , aBa B. Parcel Size:; Parcel 1 - 5.04 icres Parcels 2. 131 acres Parcel.3 1.41racres Parcel 4 5.62'acres Total, M18 acres C. _ Existing Zoning: General Industrial Cistrict (Subarea 11) 0. Surrounding_Land:Use: Worth - Existing.industrial building South East - Existing industrial building Guest - Existing industrial building E. Surrounding_General Plan and Development Cc& ®eel nations: North - General Industrial, District South - General Industrial District East - General Industrial' Distract West - General Industrial District .. U PLANNING COMISS16W STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL IHAAP 12338 - K 0— -Y-BUFFALO SIX, LTD. ., MARCH 28, 1990 PAGE 2 F. Site: Characteristics: The site is developed with three existing YETraings. _3 II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this .parcel map is to separate a previously approve dpdelopment'I'°nto 4 parcels. :Tie development was approved by the Planning Commission on June 11, 1986, for thei construction of 3 industrial buildings „as CUP' 8646. All 3 ':buildings,' have been constructed. III. ENVIRORPiENTAL REV,-tE4i: The 'applicant caqAeted Part I of the Initial' Study. a , con ucted a field investigation and completed Part,rr1 of the Initial Study; `O adverse impacts. upon 'the environment are ��nticipated as a'result of this project. Therefore, issuanIce .of tei*tive Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to, turrounding ` property. owners and plac9d Wthe Daily Report Newspaper :.•'`Posting.at tip, site has also been completed. Ask V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the'Planning Commission consider all1nput~an3eleme6ts of the Tentative Parcel Map 12338,, If. after "such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then; the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration-woul be,appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye Re Hahson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:PK:sjm Attachments: Vicinity Nap (Exhibit "'A°) - Tentative . Map (Exhibit Br): . Resolution and " Recomended 'Conditions of Approval r r� P ____ i�r fY {1 A� t - y }A V^� —WA3Q t z 3Ipmi, O'i .4010 � 1N9tiCiflS3ltef. Ir +— w R 4 is 40 (n 73Ra3 d � cx cc ----�. pq dul i �r R cow T. ,q! �� - {��.��`� Iwo_- ` ' ��_• a 3 e fTv*RISg r, RESOLUTION NO. "A RESOLUTION ,OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF, THE -CITY OF. RANCHO CUCAMOHGA, - CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY •APPROVING' TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP- NUMBER 12338, 'LOCATED AT,- THE NORTNWESi CORNER OF 61`H STREET, AND BUFFALO AVENUE, .AND ' MAKING FINDING$ IN'1UPPORT THEREOF - APH 22,9-262-2$ 'WHEREAS' 'Tentative ,Parcel Map Nunber .12338,, submitted'.; by Kensley- Buffalo'Six, Ltu:,.',*licant, for the,purpose of subdividing.into :4.pike'ls, ' the real" property situated Am the City, of Rancho, Cucamonga,; County of, San Bernardino, State of California, identified'-as APy(s122.9-262-2 located.at the northwest corner of 6th _Street and Buffalo Avenue; and WHEREAS, on Ntarch,.?8, 1990, the Planning Commission held -a duly advertised public hearing watch was continued to April. 11 =and April 9154"1990 for the above-described map. NOa, THEREFORE; THE RANCHO. CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSYOtI RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: y,h _ SErTION 1: That the following findings have been made. 1. Tha- the;map is consi stent° 'i th the,Ge'r -l' :Pl an. 2. That the improvement of the proposed su�divsion is consistent with ' he General P'ian. 3. That the ,site is physicall} suitable . for the proposed'.development. 4. That thO prop:Ied subdivision',aod improvements will not cause;substantial -eno ronoan6l damage. or public, health problems or have adverse. effects on abutt�s�g property, SECTION 2: This Comission finds and. certifies that the ,project has; been reviewed an considered in compliance with the (aliforala 1nvirormental ; Quality Act of 1970 and,,.further, this Coaission he*eby issues .a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map. Number- 12335 i.s hereby, approved subject to the ttached Standard 'Conditions and the f611". ing ,Special Conditions: ; 1. Record a reciprocal parking agreement cc'6current with the map. 2. The 20400t-wide sewerr-easement to C otonga County Water District along the "project westerly bwu6dar4 x shal1 be shown ov,de Final :,Parcel Map. v� j , prA�a �'� alsslaivsoL!rtrDH �o - , * TENT'P MAP,12335 .XEMSLEY RUFFAL0 SIX'. K!, 23 1990 PAGE �. 3 h LaYrdscape the,.6t6 Street mehian' island (full'width) from Pi ttsburg4 Ave?rue`' to,;Buffal® Avenue A ` sepa�ate.r=landscape aril irrigatioy 'plan"'lper city S Fti�n©ao ds: shall be provided sub3ect-fco.'the approvo1. the City Engineer. The Develop6r may request reimbUrsement''Agreement`to' recover;-the co s .of the landscaping in excess, of .the. cost of the'one half width ,of;t;� ;landscaping fronting<'his projectrQm futures.development oadjacent g .mcross the street properties • Nocvever', if , the 'bdvil6per on the opposi te•';side .of ! XWh Streeiz installs. the medic o island landscaping, . hen tite DeVd10per ;fcr this project (Aft 229 2E2-2B)'.shalt. pay an-.. 3.ze for.'-the,.roqt-�,of ane half the width of landscaping fronting his ON; ect 5' P - A.PROVED ' AND ADOPTED`THIS 25,1'ti;DAY�OF:APRIL, PLANNING COMMISSION OF'TNE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAliOKi1; ,BY- : arry e,., a rman ATTEST: ;Y Brad u er 2cre r Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Cainission of- tt� City oi. Rand Cucamanga, da hzieby ,Certify :that the foregoing. Resolution. - � d' I" sand'% f regularly intro`=a ; Passed, and adopted by the Planning'-Commission. of `the I City of Rancho , »3aA at a regular meeting of the P1aAning todmissign:field on the 25th day X .199ir by =the following'vote71 -to-veit AYES: COMMISS,IflNERS: 4+ .NOES: COPi 4stIONERS: r, ABSENT: COt ISSIARERS: T a r -- � . , C a� A�r g.b 'e @21� aY�6. ,, o a4 a g� r .�'.d ejb iY9• �O A.�� G4� �Itl� M �Q r _yyY � O M—� -Vr++r '.iq aOr-M •=` . fbb�Y AO '.. �_, r•� a . d + `.ou ys ZZ. it - + b $ .. `e y s rt g . offi oll lb � r� •m� �� �� ®e .+� � aq; �$• ` 3� qrk p�' p®pry{ -,`r �� pS[-M. R N b N a� o ai.. K t➢. M "bIR @�i'� �d Y `e@s p 'GJ h y > r: 6 Po �� qL Y. �✓ O '.o.o G_ f.M1. o O W 6c 9 O, CUC ZZ 21 gq 4JN LO 61 uC CN.M V9 -p5�V C Y L L�O Z^r 0O. AAV qV~ p�.A yuW ��>>' 06Lv �yy qq du.0 N' CO '4.�4 O4M LL '.tCiy �qy pyj �I' of Y V Q.v 6 Y.t f/. F.m ;^P E _ �I q r 1 -ems .o..Iib Im WW YN.N VVV 61. V Ln "Ol . c 28, ^O' r4 VL � L. �•uW �`FapgyY 010� Lo y� r 8 a yj C CN L' W e :NC OC 4:T YA 8.4 LLga 4a C C ti w{I Y.l4 7S A u M Y 6 qn di ., p6 pp1 L C Ya B OIp b � CeewC . , BL yy y y y DI N .I o Psi iti 1 G� i. .i CTTY t.1F'RANCHO CJCAM0146A. ;� t STAFF REPORT z DATE: April.25, I990. TO: Chairman and Members .of the' Planning Commission � . FROM: Brad Buller,.Cl ty Planner "t $Y: Steve,Mayes, Assistant `Planner• . • 5UBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL tiSE PERMIT .4)9 INLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP A request ,to:' establish a ;day r ; carefacility, withi►i an ,existing building :previously approved ..fojr •church;;use, to.ta.ling I&�457 square.,,feet an 2,42 acres,-.if land hl{n the dium,Restdent�ial District SLI , 14' dweili��g• units ,per 'acre),, ,located". At the north'�_s corner tzf I4th Street and Ame6tyst- Avenue APNr• 20I'474-02 AND 63. (Related•file;' Conditional C1se �Permit`89-17.)' - cj I. PROJECT AND SITE.OESCftTPTIONr A.' Action Reouested:;• Approval. of=a no�i-construction'Gnnditional Use, Permit:to establish a day care facility within 'ari existing _ building previously-approved for a church. B. Surrounding Land Use andZonin North Senior,Citizen Apartments;-High Res dential. �(A-30 dwelling units'per .acre). Also,"t4iis'arpa'is within a Senior Hd` sing'OVerl.ay•;Distrzct. South - Single 'Famliy'Residences;. Low,,f.2sidentiil (274,. dwelling units per'.acre} 'k East - Post Office, Fire Station,'and Offices;,,'. ,a Professional,and'Medium Residential:`(8-14 dweliing units;per acre}. Best = Single,;gamily Residences;.Medium•Residential (8-14 gwel l ing"unit5:per.acre).. C. General Plan Designationsi Project .site - Medium Residenti 1 (8-14,Owe IAidg units per acre). > North - ,Nigh Re-sidentiai -(24--30 d;�ei�ling ut►3ts ,er` acre) South - -Low Residential"(2=4 dwell"ing units per acre}; East; - Office and.Civ3t/Ccmeunity. Hest '"*dium,Residential (8=14 dwelhing units per acre). T�RA—B ti ' PLAHld3NGr C0MMI5SION "STAFF :REPORT CUP 90=09 -.IFlLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP,_ April 25, 1990: ~ , Page 2' i D S'it4'Characteristics- The site con airs the historic Atta Loma..'School Build ng built In 1192,1, asphalt areas; and many t = mature Pine an4-?a.m"trees. � The..,site slopes geptly to the. south at appibxima e14„ four percent., E. Parking Calculations,: ' 'Number-of Number of ` Type Square Parking Spaces Space .` of Use �Fo6f; Rat o �Reauired Provided play Nurserq 8,807 1%Staff (1st 'f,.tr. (ma )` (only) 1/5 children, 23 TOTALS,. 35 71 .•,.; F. Applicable Regulations: The Medium Residential D strict.aIIoegs nor-accessory da_.�_card facilities" (7 or ,more :children) subject—to approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning`Commission II, ANALYSIS,-, A. General: inland' Area Fellowship As proposing to,uti.b the f'�ist,fioor. ofc artex-►sting burlding,rtthe old Alta,toma S4hool, as a, day,ca re, facility. '. On October 25-' 1989, the•Fellowship was granted,a Conditional Use 'Permit:,to use' •the building as their church.-'faci11jy....'wthis builOjng.�wass;designated-, as a `Point of Historical. Interest bu the: City. Council .on- December. . 2Z-, '1988, after•.recommendation:from the Historic. Preservatio?l Commission , �-t"vas the;Couricil's°desire to have the;.building restore:: to its original`condition as mucW as. possible and Vj designate it as an Historic Landmark in the future. � . At this time;; the .church proposes to- offer,: day. ,care,4onday.- through Friday, 6:30 a:m,. to 7:00 p,m. Church, serv[ces are proposed for after 7:00 pro.l on ue'6esday ' and Sunday, mornings. .,Therefore, the,only'church related activities that . ?' will take place ''during:; weekday, working ,hours .will,;be :the. office activities of'the .Pa.stor and Ciurch`Secretary„ B. Issues: Yhere ar4 two primary issues related, to "this ;. 'request compatibility% uses and .parking availability. ti- t i 1 M1 t A PLAdNIM COMMISSI04 -STAFF REPORT CUP 90'-09. - YNLAND,AREA FELLOWSHIP April 25,-I990 Page 3.` As described . n.the surrounding land use section, res}dent'iAl It ^d uses>of,varying. intensities exist.'to the north, south, " art',west of,the proper,ty proposed for day ;a`re. lmrma l,y, most day-care.services plan ou`Edoor,activities "during _the course,,of a day; In some. cases, .th ese two items -act `to counter one another and- create ��a potential` for :no"ise conflicts. To mitigat',:this concern', staff has recommended, , , in the past-,that outdoor activit et`be'.located south-and-east of,'the bu.i'ldiiii. In this area; ,the building would 'act is a. noise: harrier for ,the;; surrounding residential r,?7and; uses. However, the..State requires that 75 -,quare feet, of outdoor. play area be provided per child. . Given this requrementsand the "applicant's intention to care .1tr a potential' of 100 children, ,(see Exhibit "C=2",)., .a miniih of ;7;500 square feet, of oufdoo_r . play area will be reequired" .:for outdoor activities : Only 1,500 square feet 0,P be;_ provided` i'n."the "shielded" .area, fan apditionaa. .5,604y?aquare feet will: be needed''on_site.to'meet the.State'"s requirements.' In 'order to mitigate.V a potential for land ;use compatib Itty., problems, 'staff has included` condi,'tzons` 'm the.. attached' Resolution` of Approval to have the 0openission reconsider this permit .i,f any any effects, such,as noise .are _created by,.`r the day care facility.operating.at this si.� 5tai'f has recommended a candition that all !outdoor-play areas wihl be enclosed,' by .5 foot wrought, iron fence, or equivalenti, to clearly specify aimits',of the-outdoor acti'vities.' Finally, staff is recommending that only tlie: t,500 square feet'-south and :east of the, uilding'.be used 'until the nu children exceeds 20, which. is the numtier'at.,which the secondary,a,"rea- (see.Exhihit "V) will',need to,b utilised. The. issue of parking ava`ilabi'lty is ;coasnonly,ass ocfiate`d faith ` a day care`, use at`a church fat ility, The `approved site ,plan for the church has '7l ,parking spaces. The Development`,Code, requires 60 spaces for ;the' church, use and 35 parking ;.sp;3ces. for the-'day care .use', based; on figures ."specified by. the ',. applicant. owever, as previously mentioned; theinie'nt of the;,_,appl ican' i,s° not_to overlap hours of ,operation_ for_the c%urrh 'and day ;care services, with .the exceptic►n o'f dai1Y church office activities,'which only requires the -`pasto`r,and secretary. Therefore, :ample, parking; should be available at a11' times far both uses. The Rancho Cucamonga yFire Protection Distr'ict`,will require' tenant improvement . plans and:: an. approved` fire.,Anspection request through the Departmeht; bf,Social-Services, Coma¢aaglty ,are Licensing, ;prio.r to' using the; buildng' for day actvities`(See Exhibit '3 PLANNING COMMISSIO,N'-STAFF.REPO CUP 90-09 - I.NLANO AREA FELLONS'YIF` April 25, 1990» Page 4 �.. C xnvironmental'' Assessment{ .Upon review -o,f'` Part 'I, of E'the initial,"stddy ands-comptletion:=o;i ePart II o.f the Environmental checklist,"tsta€f• 'has fatInd °no ignifi:aan. :nipacts:roilated,_to. ° 7ocating 'a day `care •facility' within this '`existing :church building, III FACTS FOR {FINDINGS the COMISsibn ,must mAe aTl the=following , fii;dings in"order"to'approve this application: 1. That the proposed.use -is' in accord with the Neneral'-Plan,;the t objectives . of the .Development; Code`, .and_=purpose`s of ' the district in whachthe site'is ]ocated,;rand 2. That .the prapased use, -fogether� With,conditians applicable theretoi will notbe detr,._`nial, to- the public heaith,,�.safety,'' or . .welfare, or, materially ',:injurious , to pNapert9es 'or impr vement$ in the Ytcih ty, and' 3. That the proposed use complies. with caIble ° Provisions of,the Development Code. - IV, CORRESPONDENCt: This';item has bem lvertised as.A puhl c..,hear ng in the Dail ..Ieport. newspaper, Ere prop, posted,,,and notices sent to adjacent praperty .owners within'300 fedt,.at,,the'prg3ect` V. RECOMMENDAtl4i Staff, recommends,approval of the Conditional Use Permit-,,�90-09 .through adoption of_the attached Re`solutio�i of Approval, } Re'sp .Cli submitted, `I i Brad u r' City°Pl per. BB:SH/jgs Attachments: Exhibit "A° S'/te Ut'ilization,Mao Exhibit'"B°` - Site Plan° Exhibit "C" Letter fioW Applicant ,Exhibit "DO' - Letter from Ranche Cu6ft�nga Protection District dr Exhb3t N' is - Floor. Plan': Resolution of Approval. 4 4: • .z r ono � � `v'�``.a.�i + f :�•���.+. 1 IN al ��t7A,L: 26APW R$$13�F84tit. Qa i. 7W=COLA. .:' w I r idyl 8 3 0 r- ItARt t)hCUCAMONGA ; eve 1.a ©4 tj f4 Al sµ 1f _ .. IyANoN n n r -LLjwiA a1tBAeQGw,nsa.' d.p7.�1 1� �; 1 ►wraart C,�ar,l, ii.900�ie1C1 '. �*' � 1 �+ x' ~� �� , tofuftalm acque" so am t it 77 ra tk" R N _ $) C>r,q ,emAl►anal •- 7hN►7i ereelq,s 7ogre Y . it il7eCiY�cO',lei I•T,teNr,r7 afspMt S�� � spa '� •I _ �a�, �. _a to 4, M i y 5. M 1� ITY OP RAli 9 CU— CAMONGA vst• PY.ANNI O'DI IORi TM nxHt8 iT:'//3`N SCALE: �' ♦e. .. ot P.O.Box Al Random Cucamonga.CA Wao (714)987-1206 � Bill Flanders`tor February 27, 1990 : Mr. Steve Hayes Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga L 9161 Baseline Rancho: Cucamonga, CA 91730 PX: Conditional Use. Permit to `ostablish, a Day',Care Facility at 9488 19th;St_ Dear Steve, Inland area "Fellowship is regt.estitiq that a Mon-construction Conditional Use permit be issued to conduct, a Day care Program in the First floor of. our Facility at 9488 19t} Street; A Conditional Use Permit to use'.the site as a church was issued in octoDe-z 1-589. We are, in process o€`renovating the building in accordance with the requirements of the Building and Safe}y,_ Planning, Fire and Engineering 'departments of the City rif Rancho Cucamonga. A'parking lot with 71 parking pi,..-.es, and wfiell as landscaping will be installed on the property. , The Day Care Facility will operate Monday through Friday 6:30 a.m.'` to 7 p.m. Normal church hours_will be on Sundays and Wednesday nights after 7 p.m, The only normal church activities during the week day time hours would be office activity on the',Second,Floor' by the pastor and church secretary. An application for e,eay Care license is being filed with the California State Department of Health and Wel`rare. The facility will meet Fire Department requirements and includes a sprinkler systs-% emergency l ghtingr visual and audio alarms,` and pull alarms. Panic hardware will be installed on all. exit doors. Inland Area Fellowship is requesting •a CUP to operate at this location becauso (1) it owns this property, (2) the building will. not be used for church services,during weekday daytime hours, (3)' t•, there;is a need in'the community for,"Quality Day Care Services, and: (4) surplus'.income from' the Day Care will help offset the cost of upgrading the building and property. . When the school is fW 1y _operational we hope to have 115`children and a staff:of 14 adults: ' Sincerely, William RC Flanders P.astoe 1. 1VG` ��� x a P O.Box Ai Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 (714)9EI7-1200 BillFlandeis April" 18, 1990 Pastor'. Steve Hayes Planning"Department City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9340 Baseline, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 RE: Children's Play Area Dear Steve, State regulation,for Day Care Centers' require 75;squite feat ofoutdoor play areal per child. We are planning to be.'licensed for 100 children. Tkiis means 'that' no we need to provide less than 7,,500 square feet of outside play area. The area to the east of the building is approximately 1,500 square feet. Therefore, we 3 need to provide an additional 6,000 of play area. We are proposing to establish this additional area immediately north of the north parking lot,'.; A play ground of 50 feet by 120 feet will give us the nestled square footage. : As shown in the. attached map this still �3ives us So feet to the northerii edge of, the property. In 'addition, the southern edge. of the adjacent property to the immediate north is a driveway. This adds at least an additional 30 feet from the,nearest residence to the playground: This is a more than adequate,,�Astance and more than most preschools in the area provide Sincerely, s 1i, William R. Flanders Pastor: O `RANCHO^-t.0 O CiA Mw Cvt� Ro=bG Pa.ANAIiAtG DTiMION TT4a Ltt�, SALE. RANCHO'CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Post Offftt 8o-850,Rancho Cucamonga,California 91701.0850, till)987-2535 CIOMarch S. 1990 Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department P.O.Sox$07 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Planner Steve RE:. Inland Area Fellowship Child Care CUP Dear Steve: I This letter is to confinn the phone conversation we had on Match 2, 1990 At � this time, the church. does sot have a form; i€850`Fire Safety Inspection Request from the Department of Social Services, Community Caro Licensing. The Fire ' District will need to review this form to determine the numbers, ages, and ambulatory status of the children covered by this license, All these factors have a direct bearing on the exiting requirements applied to the building The pastor was advised this date to contact Licem 'ng to start the necessary ; paperwork. In the meantime, you and I agreed tle earliest the CUP could be heard before the Plhtrning Commission is April 11, 3�_Q0,., We have no objection to the Commission accepting the CUP in concept that watt% with the condition that no approvals •vilI be granted. until all building permits have been issued, Ask and all construction has been satisfactorily finished anal. inspected. Once that is done, then the church can submit' a completed floor plan of the area where they wish to be licensed to care for the children. We will do an inspectWit after we -review their floor plan," and receive form. #850. it is possible this, may exceed the 1.t3iI 11, 199J hearing data_ Even, if that is the case, the Firr, District will not be. abler to approve any occupancy of the butt" g by the children until all lbesa requirements are met, Thanks for your help, I appreciate your keeping, me advised of the status of this project. Sincerejly, • Stt`sa>�'D1 Wloife L"�". �'t/ Fire Prevention Inspector spiv/js CUCAMONCA d1Et+ : P Via-o� f� L IeiN KG-DIMION ; t 1 Mn A� : 4Ynw ewM � �• dam/ ''.. Owl: mil':- • ,. �q! t WYsq lll�llr' �w�l rAV. - �r..r Drew arr ! U""LISM L'OY'0.°R L1:11EL_ riTv or-, C'..+�..�1p��y2�i��M�T V�E�It� VimA* OYV• �. Cu 7 xSTON Il -- L :'t " _SC LE: i' RESOLUTION NO. A; RESOLUTION OF .ME °ONNING COMMISSION OF 'THE CITYY OF r' tIAYCHO CUCAMONGA,;- .CAL'IFORNIA, APPROVING' CO3''1I;TIONAL USE PERMIT NO., 90 09 ,FOR -A' DAYCARE FACILITY WITHIN'- AN' EXISTING BUILDING, PREVIO(JSLY APPROVED -FOR'A k CHURCH USE, TOTALINO.16: 4"5Z."'SQJRRE'=FEET ON 2`42, ACRESOF`JAND IN°!THE MEDIUM. 4ZO NTIAL,,,DISTRICT, (8=I4�DWELL �UNITS 'PER ACRE) LOCATED ATSTHE'NOR,7HWEST CORNER QF inTH;STREET.ANO ' AMETHYST AVENUE,`AND-MAKING FINDING.,IN``SUP,PORT T REOF - ' AP,N: 201-04 02 RND.03' X. Recitals." k; Iniand Area Fellowship! has filed 'an, applicWgil, for the'nssuance of the Conditional Use Permit No 90-09,as described �n ;` title of this ution. eia ths - the 'Rol ern tect "a., Permitr'request is,,referred to as, ":the 6pplicAtt;�n." ofl On December 21,' I988, +.the building teas designated as a Point,,of~, Historic Interest by the City` Council. (i'ii) on, Octoher .25y ` 1989, Irrl'add Area feliowship was;` granted y. Conditional Use Permit No. 39 17 to utllize the existing building as;a Church. , . (iv) On the April 25, '1990, the Planning Commsston 'of the City. of $ancho 'Cucamonga conducted,a duly' noticed public hearing on_ the applicatfon.. n- and concluded said hearing on that date r (v) A.l � Legal prereguisi�tes prior to. the adoption ufithis Resolution have occurred. a. Resolution." NOW,- THEREFORE. ,it is hereby "found= determined and resolved x°by ihe= Planning Commission of`.the City-.of Rancho'Cucamonga asfolloa�s'. 1. This Commission hereby speci ficaliy 'finds ihat all .of the facts .set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of'this Resolution"are' true arid.correct 2. Based upon substantial evidence `preaented to. thL�- Commission during the above-referenced ;public nearing on Aprit 25 1990- including atr.�itten:and� oral staff reports, 'together, with public testimony„ this Comaisston here6/ specifically finds as followit S w 3 t. t r PLRNNJI G ,GOAMISSION R£50LUTIOF3 NO. CUP 90'-09 "-;INLAND AREA"FELLOWSHIP; April 25, 1990, Page 2 R (a) The applacation applies to property located 'at,the DCthwest corner,.,'of '19th Street and Amethyst. Avenue with"-astreet frontage"af:�4D fleet and lot .depth;of 365',;feet.a'nd :is.presently" improved with"an ex-fisting building, ',. paved ;parki g areas;<.curb and gutter; apd , . = (b) : The `property,,to :the. north'of the subjecttite"is Senlor Citizen" }dousing, .the`praper.ty to, .the 'south of,::that site consists of singlg fami.l'y residences, the property o "the,east is developed`with 'a._Post office,,. lire' Station and o€fives, and "the property to the west is.si_ngle fa,mr1y:-esidence's; and (c) The property. s.,zoned "Nedium Residential" ,by''the".Develppn2nt `Code. (d) The:proposed daycare fae" lity wiz operate.,-from 6 S A.M. :to, 7:00 P.M.," Monday through Friday;' on the firsis floor"of;the'existjL'= ehurch building. (e) .Services wii`I 'be conducted �y the approved church on Sundays and Wednesday nights after '7:00 p;m. 3: Based, upon the sub stantial°°evidende presented' 'w this` Core�niss on during the above-referenced:`pubiid 'hearing and upon the specific,I ndingt,;of facts set for, in paragraphs ll.and 2 above, this Commission herebyfinus.and concludes a's;foilows�. (.a) That the proposed 'Use'is in. accord with ttie,.General Plan, the Objectives of the Development Code,'and tbe.purp, ses of the-Ji,stric�� in which the site is located.'' (b) That.the' proposed use, together With the conditions'applicable thereto',,will not be detrimental to,the public.,;health,' safety, or Hreifare;''or. . materially injurious to properties;or'improvements in,the vicinity:. ' . (C) That the proposed ,`use complies,,,with eAch' of the applicabra provisions of the DeVelopment'Code - <t 4. This ;Commission hereby find's and` certifies "that the.'.project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with ;the" Ca]iforn a ,Environmental Quality Ac:. of 19 U and : further," this Commission hereby `issues,.a htiegative Declaration. 5. Based` upon':he'find1ings and,.conclusions'Kset ,,krth fir. ;paragraphs 1, 21 3, and 4. above,- this Commission -hereby_appraves the application sub3ect,.:ta each and e'r:ry condition, set forth belowt Z- PLANNING COMRISSION Ri;SOLUT30N N0;< CUP,9049 INLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP' ,. April 25,-1990 Page 3 Planninq .Divisibn - v 1) A1,1 applicable condiiri'ons fo° 'Resolution No. 89-139 'shall apply'e 2) Approval aF`this `request.`shall not waive compliance with-all sections of''the Development Code an al,i other:City;;Ordinances. Jr 3) If the operation of:the facility caus" adverse effects upon adjacent.. businesses or,operatiors,ti-inal'udi°ng,;but 'ho'.t limited to noise, the Conditional Use ermit shall be brou ht before 9. the Planning Commission for'' consideration. and ` oossile . terminatian:of the ;use. 4) Occupancy of the facility�shali nut c6mence 'until':such, ti616 as 4III all Uniform Building Code and, State Fire,I arshall,'s regulations have been complied.with. , Prior to, occupancy,; plans,, sh"all be submitted. to the Rancho Cucambnga-fire._Prote.tion,District.and the Building"'and Safety 'Division' to show'compliance. T'he building shall :be inspected for compliance 5) Any sfgns • proposed for the facility.,=shall" be'- designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance, "and shall require review and approval by the ;Planning" Division prior`to installation.. 6) Operating hours for day .care shall be limited to Monday through Fridati�, 6:30 a.m. .to. 7:00 p m . `c except national hol':idays i- as not to. conflict with hours •of``public' assembly:(Sundays. 'and al er'7.00 p m on,,Hednesday nights). 7) There shall be no 'weekday c_hurch .relaf..� activity which, will exceed available parking.. ' ' A) All outdoor play activities shall be 1imited'to, the: ekisting . areas south, and .east; of. tge building until the',number of children exceeds 20; at which time secondary ;outdoor activity area "orth of the driveway'.may be used. : 9) The outdoor play area shall be secured.by a miy0mum 5-foot high wrought iron fence with -piilasters, or equivald.,z, as determin A by the City; Planner. Prior to;.instal lation of.said :fence,., detailed plans shall be-'submitted for` `rev it;r',and. 'approval-'of , the City Planner, 10) Approval shall . expire, unless extend,d by the,' Planning ' Coaanission, if building per®its.;are not Issued or appresed use has net commerced Y_" ^=,twenty-four .(;20 months from the date of approval. PLANNING COMMISSION .RE$QLUTtO ,NO. t CUP 90-09. INLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP April 25,.,1990 °age.4.. 6'. The, Secretary to.this CoTnl$sion sha11 certify to the. adoptjon°qf this Resolution ,APPROYED'AND ADOPTED`THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 1990.; ' PLANNING COMMISSION QF THE CITY OF-RANCHO CU *bN6A :BY: Larry T., McNfiel, Chairman P� AT7EST:� `Brad Buller ,Sec,retary - I, Brad Buller, Secretary `of the Planoing ,Commisszow,of_,the' City of ,Ranc.ho Cucamonga, do: hereby`cert fy°that the < forego 'ng Resolution was duly' and regviarTy introduced;, piss"edr and=adoptied by the Pt,anging :Coranis"sion �ofthe. " City of Rancho Cucati�onga,.at a 'regular meeting ox the'Plannirtg Co�nission held . on the 25th d of ay, ?;¢ri1; 1,990; by' the _fellor�ing vote-to Nt�t ,•. w . t AYES: COttMISSIONrRS .° ?' >, } `. � NOES: GQMMISSTONERS,r "_rry ABSENT: COMF.ISSIONERS,, e i� i Z F' r i77777 CITY OF RANCfit)CUCAMQNGA.. 'wStAF+Y`REPORT I, DATE: April 25; 1990 TO: Chairma,r:_ind Members of the P1anning;;Commiss'ion FROM: Brad Bu1;er, City Planner BY: Jerry Guarracino, Assistant Planner CSUBJECT: EENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-26 COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH ° pro�u�al �to construct a` 14,350 square - fcot, two-story building addl;tion, (Containing 10 classrooms, 2 faculty`sresource centers, and fellowship hall') to an existfng 11,000 square foot Church., The. project is in a Medium'Residential District. (8-14 dwel.l.igg units per` acre), located on, the northwest. corner of Beryl anu.l9th Streets - APN: 232-22148. I 4 4 i.< PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action 'Regues 9: Approval- of site plan, elevations, ;,grading. plan, landscape plan, phasing,plan,: Conditional.'Use Permit, and I suance of a Ne ative De claration eclaration=for the Church expansion. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Foothill Freeway right-of-away; Law Residential. (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Residential, and Vacant; Low Residential (24 dwelling units per acre).' East - Single Family Residential; Low Residential {-2.4 dwelling units per acre) - West - Apartments; Medium High Residential (' 24 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site--Mediv.:n Residential `(4-14 dwelling units' per acre) North - Frevway.right-of-way. South - Low Residential (2-4.dwelling units per acre) . East - tow Residentia'1 (24 dwelling.units per acre) ' West. Medium `High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre, °w t d tr 1, f PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89-26 COMMUNITY BAPTIST C"URCH- , April 25 1996 Page 2 0. Site Characteristics The southern, portion .Of.the site is currently developed with a T4,500 square foot;,Anctuary,';and 167 parking spaces, Access to the site is achived`by 2 driveways on eery! Street ani one driveway on' 19th Sr'eet WhiChL is shared with the apartments to the 'west. 7 a ,rzorthern;rportion of the site is currently- undeveloped. iwo ' .temporary trailers,; currently used as classrooms,-are located on. the northerly portion of. the' 'site. Alttiougit the` property is generally well maintained, ,a recent'- inspection of the site revealed 'several dead trees within the planter islands. of'the existing parking` lot, and those trees need replacement: E. Parking Calculations:' Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage. Ratio Required Provided' Church/Sanctuary 4,,056 1J35* 116 116 Balcony 151** 14 * 38 64 TOTAL 154 .. 180 Churches require; I parking space for each 4 fixed seats within the main auditorium .or one for each "35 square feet. of seating area.within the main auditorium where there are no fixed seats; 18 linear inches ` of bench shall 'be' cansidered a fixed seat. ** Seats F. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code permits church uses within. the Medium Res:ldential District subject to a 'Conditional Use Permit. 11. ANALYSIS: k Oac"round: On July 9, 1986 the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 86-0`'e The approval was:for.a Master Plan for the Church tixpanslo that would be accomplished' in two phases. The first phase, which was.'never'built, 'was, to consist of a 5,400 square foot fellowship hall, additional classrooms., , and an additional 252 'parking spaces, Later that year, on October 8, 1986, the.Planning Commfssior+� conditionally approved a mod fication of Conditional Use`'Ferm"it, 86-02 to allow She use of two teat orar p . Ytrailer s as°classrooms during the construction of the 5,400 square foot expansion. Condition 1 of the approval states that: G 5. t. A1sNIING COMIS$2014 t*AFF REP012t CLIP 89-26 - COMMUNITY 8APTIST CHURCH .April 25, 1990 Page 3 "The temporary trailers"wilt?be. "parmitted until such time as' Phase I is completed or,twa yea'rs,.whichever"comes,first.; This condition shall be formalized" by an, agreement drafted by the applicant to the sat`,'t4 aM on of the .City llttarnpy and executed .rior to the install`ition of the tra iler`$: o date, the traT,fers "are Stil'i in ase on the f site and the applicant is proposing that :they remain until thlstcompletian �w Phase I of the new Master..Plan. B. Pro7ec't `PhasinQ Although the project was originally .proposed r I r to be built in one: Phase, the"applicant, q1r March°28,,E T990; submitted a letter to the,Pianriing Department to modify. the { appticatinn {Exhibit ',The 4001icant-nbw.'plans to,develop,` the project in two 'phases. Exhibit "B" `shows the "limits of each phase, Phase ;ris: Consists of construction" of a I.I050 square foot. two-story classroom building;north 'of the °existing sanctuary, the reconstruction of .the northern-most 'Beryl =Street Drive approach, the completion of 13 new parking spaces, ',and the removal of,-the 2 temporary trailers Additionally, tine undeveloped northern, portion'of"the_sxte w111 ;be rough'-graded and a gravel base applied to proVide,ov0 flow parking. Phase Two: Would begin no 'later than 18months after-..the completion of Phase One acd would .include eompletionhof all parking,- landscaping; sprinkiers, 'and, lighting. in'the hdrt,hern portion of the project,,$Ate per Exhibits "B-E." C. Compatibility. The project site is serve by l9th Street ;ors the, south and Beryl, Street ;on the east, both of.'which are improved and capable of .handling thei quantity »of traffic generated by the proposed use,. No conflicts have been observed ' or are "anticipated between the proposedi project' and the :- apartments to. the west;`arid the Fo{thill Freeway"right-pf-ytay to the north presents no,compatibiTity problgm, Tile"Church has . " operated-at this location forl the past`ten lyiars without conflicts; D. Design Review Conmittee"s The, Design Review Cormmittee CChitiea, Biakesiey; Kroutil reviewed the project an March 22, 1^901 and recommended approval subject to the `fallowing conditioas`e. 1. The northern-,mast driveway .approach on Beryl.Street should F be reconstructed�a5 follows. a. 0616te the island planter,, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89-25 - COMMUNITY 9APTIST CHURCH'' April 25 1990 Page 4 f s , b._ Reconstruct the southerly portion of the drive: approach to the north: c. Prav tle a standard 35-foot minimum drive approach. d.' Reduce the amount of enhanced pavement to inc;lzde the driveway,throat only, 2. Fnhanced pavement may be colored concrete with a washed finish. The color should be approved'by staff aO:must, be an integral -part of the mixture. A test panel should be approved by the Planning staff°in the field., 3. Provide a screed at "the base of the 45-iiegree 'cornice detail to create--.a smooth transition between the. two stucco colors, 4. Window mullions are to have an anodizkd rather than painted finis»: 5:. The Commiss ton,._suggested the applicant, look for. an opportunity, . to incorporate• the da41ker (basel 'color, proposed for the addition, into the existing structure. E. Environmental Assessment: Part,I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicants Staff has. completed -Part It Lof the Environmental Checklist and has found nonsignificant impacts on, the environment as a result of this. project. III: FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Irr order to approve the Conditional Use; Permit, the Commission would need to make the following findings: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General' Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the pur.poses'af: the district in which the site is located. 2. That the' proposed use, together with�'the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious 'to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed'use .complies -with each of the applicable provizions of the Development Code. IY. ' CORRESPONO NCEr This item has been advertised:' as a public bearing: in The Daily` Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to all property owners within 300.feet of the Rroject site. 47 r, PLANNING.TIMMISSIONV STAFF REPORT ' CUP,89-26^301GbftlhtITY BAPTIST CH,CHUR `April 25,'x;fl90;, �� Page 5 V. RECO1018NDATION: Staff recommends",that the "Plannin'g Cortmission_ approve Cond.i�tiona37Use Permit`N6,,89'26, subject'to t'he Conditions' of Approval,,; througf� "adoption the: attached R'zsblution, aid isscance of a' Negative Declaration.' Res f y subm ted,` Ci y ianne>'� BB:J .fs- Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site UtiTs2ation`:Mp `- { Exhibit "'B'! - Sitd-1P1io Exhibit "G" - Landscape-Plan ` Exhibit "D"'-..Lighting Pla,h Exhibit,"E"'- Grading Pian Exhibit 'IF" - Floor Pian Exhibit "G" - Elevation's _.!. Ext Carres'pordence '°H - f` 4. i t t � .�:.Ilot ill i. t®sh_ is n � _>r.= ■_ Av US ME �e;g� v T � .p O 0o vcs ld S � ' c nj_11.,Tui c` 1 Flo E i � ff � �`�i! g �• C ii9 lI!i f rr 9u 0 �r AIr � A io 7� 77�.rt 7 1 j' 4 O ' OOOOOOd9«t UR dik Mr- RIM r „r •�j\: ,is y'�S.';T --,,.ram-, r;. �uo� s �r eA•l r� .�: �. r e i 4.1 t a'' t \ -� j2 j♦ 1L l- G � F - i --- - —� — -- 1 l ,� JIM t a i llitl4l tillif N1N3U NIN �.•"j ;mac =`�-,. .-:, �' � �. L all �,i• .:.,mow• � � � �I �1,!• f i � UUa a^�/ t •�1 �_ —. i� � �. r I G- D 1 ,, i e r" 0 G� • � !y w� C6,, I h 4 � 1►70iE i�+.7 pt �OEMy. � �� r■ ti is =Udma- WE s. rarer'—` t •2:Y 1 t� 1 a Pitdssii o March 29, 1.990 Prefer J.Pl4cssl:AJA. Architect Akin DcI=u,AOA Jerry Guarracino, Assistant.Planner 'Archlte& City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division _9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 RE: Community Baptist Church Family, Lif e Center` CUP 89726 Dear Mr. Guarracino: it has been brought to our attention by the Community' Baptist Church that the basis for our "required parking" calculations for trc proposed `classroom 'facility was not. ini.accordance with th6ir intended usage of the facility. ., t- e required parking shown on the design review applications assumed a Sunday morning "worst-rase" scenario of concurrent maximum occupancy of the existing ;sanctuary and new classroom, building with persons of senior high 'school .age or older. However, the Church's planned "primary u•1se` for the new, Y classrooms during the "worst-case" scenario :is for' children from 3 yrs. -of age through junior high school age. Furthermore, the Church does not intend -to occupy the proposed Fellowship •Hall concurrently with the :main Sanctuary, but ._nstead would stagger youth meeting times`with those of service times to avoid attendance -onflicts. Consequently, if the development code parking requirements for elementary and< junior high school .use wer.4 applied to"the, proposed classrooms, then the required parking'„would be dramatically reduced from that previously indicated. Upon j .review of the attached "parking,tabulation". your willfind that the "worst-case" scenario generates approximately the, same number of spaces required :as those 'spaces already providad. Thus, the prop osedr phasing of, the parking''lot development will not adversely affect the',;usage of the site or surrounding neighborhood,. actually'it''will provIide .on site "overflow" parking well in excess of demiaied generated by the proposed development, Tl TI"U: EXHIBM SCALE. . S'267 Ham' �Avaett 3.Sul?e 2 „! Rancho CtaeCmonW Cad 41730 • (7149Et371561=. Terry Guarracina' March `29, 1490 k Pags 2- of 2 } x, Jerry, we would appreciat? your. review o our,zevised" calculations: and"the letter of intended usage grdsided by he. Church; and concur with our conclusions that, the existing gar;cing areas and nropo_sed "overfle+w" parkrg area. vr ?1 generously, exceed ne:current`and futureineeds`of th`e.Church: Should you have ;_any *questions =slat' hg:, to tho' attached. exhibits, please'do not'hes tiate'to' Cal 1'; Sincerely, Pit�.ssi.'D u Architects' ; 1 f, Daniel'J. Benner ; Project Architect DB:mao Enclosures: Parking Tabulation L;Atter, of. Intended usage . . 1 F'\ t 1- 1- af' I -T eft March 29,1990 Jerry Guarracino,Assistant Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga,CA 01730 Dear Mr.Guarracino Community Baptist Church of Alta Loma currently has a.building project in the review cycle of she Rancho Cucamonga's City Planning Division' (Reference CUP'.S9 26) Th; :project calls `for construction of a two story Sunday School classroom facility whose primary usage would be to support church services held on 1Friday evenings and Sunday motmngs. In light of this intended usage,Community Baptist Church plans,to perform the construction and development in two phases. Phase Ore would consist bf the construction of the building grid final grading of the parking site North of tli:existing developed parking spate and deposit a gravel base that could be used to accommodate ovmflow parking. Phase Two Iwould begin no later thou eighteen (IS) months after the completion of`Phase One and would complete all parking, landscaping, sprinVers and lighting in the North portion of the'projeet site. The deferment of Phase Two wil not be a detriment to the expanded'.Church'facilities for the following reasons: 1)The planned use of the classroom but'iding vein be to house small children from three years of age through junior high students. High school stu(lt:nts will meet~during one:Sunday. service and on Tuesday evenings. (The a fisting portable units;currently:prosRde this classroom meeting space.) Therefore,construction of the building will rick no new demands for additional .parking; 2)the architectural plans currently before the Planning Division reflect a requirement of 230 parking places using the.current city planning,ratios and number fov.p6blie facilities The`Church pe currently has an average use of 135 spaces r church service with a high of 175:cars during the largest service. There are 165 available parking spaces which would only occasionally:dictate use of the proposed overflow area. The actual parking profile is well below the requirements and in line with the existing number of available spaces. In addition,normal daily usage requires only ZS parking spaces In the three to five year future,CWs expansion of the auditorium will dictate the.tequirement for parking expansion which will already hams been completed at Phase Two. It is for the above reasons that Community Baptist Church of Alta'Lana is,requesting permission be granted to complete this project in two phases:Pham Om building_construction with graveled parking,and Phase Two,full paring lot deelopment with all landscaping,sprittltlers and tightin& Thank you very much for your cooperation and consideration on this project. Sincerely, 4�Q ------- ITEM: Reingrover TfTLE PM _'ect Manager £XIIT: Ccmmunify Baptist Church C; -s� _ ' -Cx G'9 • 9C9d �9fh 7P' u ea C1 _,Cor'orO0, CA 91775 ®'''7 4 C� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE' PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE •CITY OF RANCHO::CUC.4MONGA,' C'ALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT;N. 89-2670 :EXPAND THE COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH OF ALTA zxn, LOCATED' AT 5i090' 19TH STREET: IN THE. KGDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ,.AND MAt;ING' FINDINGS IN, SUPPORT THEREOF A% 201-223, 08. A. vRecitals.. (i) The Comma 'ity Baptist_;Church of'Alta Loma, has filed an application for the iss.ance? of the Conditional Use' Permit N61. 89-26 as described in the l title;ov this`Resol,utiorl. Hereinafter in this Resolution., the subject Conditional , Use, Permit 'request is referred to7 as "the application." '(ii) On the 25th.day of April,, 1990, the':Planning Ccmmission of the � ., Ci,ty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a dully .noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date; (iii,) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption 6f this'Resolution,' have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE; it is, hereby found, determjned,. and resolved, .by -the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby, specifically 'finds that. all of,the facts set forth in.the Recitals, Part A,"of this Resolution.are t;;ue';and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to r�,s Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on Aprja 25, 1.990,�,including ►written snd oral staff •e orts, together' with ' ppublic testimony, .,chia Commission `hereby; specifically finds as follows:' (la) The application applies to property Tocated at 9090 19t1i Street with a street frontage of 330 feet and "a lot depth of 654".feet ':and . is presently' improved with a 10,500 square.-foot sanirtuary; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is-,the Foothill Freeway right-of-way; the property to the, south of 'that site consists of Single Family Residential and Vacant, Low''Residential; ,the property, to;the east is Single Family,Residential, and the property to the west Iis apartments." 3. Based upon ,he substantial evidence. !presented' to this Commission during the above-refeiIenced public hearing and upon zhe specif dt finda_ngs, of, facts set forth in par,yraphs l and 2 above, tiiS.-Commission hereby finds and concludes as `ollows.: :a t _-./47 PLANNING' COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO Y CUP 89-26 - CamUNITY':$APTIST CtiURCF( April 25, 19U Page 2 at !a) That the proposed use is in accord with,the General Plan, the objectives of the Development. Code, :and the°'purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the'_props'; ed use, together with tire• conditions^applicable thereto, .wilt not,be. det07menta, 'to, public •hea,lth; •safety, �r we]fare or', :ma tet•a?Ty injurious to properties,or improvementg in the vicinity. �L) • That the, proposed .use ,complies, with`.each of A provisions of the D,evel;opment,,Cotle.,<:,; 4. This C(%Omissidn hereby Finacr-�nd°certifies that the,project •has,been: reviewed and considered in ' compliance with the � Cal•i:forn'ia` Environmental quality a,' of 1,'970 and,�r further, this Cor mission hereby `issue"s a .Negative Declaration. 5, Based upon the findings and ;copc,uslonls4set for 7n paragraphs 1, 2Da 3, and 4', above, this .Commission hereby approves 'the age tication�subject to; each and .every` condition seta forth below_ and tn' t)je attached Standard Conditions;, attached hereto and incorporated he rein by this reference: Planning Division: i, Any mpdif expansion',"or, other'changs in operation wi11 " require a,rev ion to tke, Conditional. Use Permit. 2. Approval of this ,reouest shall. no.tswaive compliance sYith4 a]l sections :of the Development Code• and, all ,oth`er applicable Ordinances in effect at the'.tnta of occupancy: 3 : -Any day care services to be provided by the` Church will rei'?aire, an amendment to ,this Conditional Use PenftWand compliance'With` State Li'censi:►g, Regulations. . 4 The northern-most •driveway 'approach on Beryl .Street .sball• be reconstructed a foITas: a. '' Delete the island planter, b. 'Reconstruct <the", southerly portion of the drive approach to the north. C. ' Provide a standartl`35-foal minimum drive approach. d." Reduce the amount of enhanced pavement to. inclUde the,= driveway throat. only, PLANNING COMMISSION�RES&UTIO,N N0. CUP 89-26 - COMMUNITY BAPTIST;CHURCN April 25' 1990 Page"3 5. Enhanced. pavement shall - be Colored, concrete lvith' a .tectured, washed finish.• The color shall be approved" by staff-and must be an integral" part of the mixture. ; Provide a tes�l` panel for. approval ,by the':Planning,stafif in the field. . c 6. Provide a screed at the bas,i of 'the,45-degree cQrnice detailto ' create.a,smooth transition-`.6etween the two stucco colors. 7. Window. mullions" shall .have an anodized rather ' han "painted finish. 8. The temporary trailers:. shall be permitted" •until. such" tame as, Phase ,One; is- completed;at, two years; whichever comes first'. A` deposit toi cover the cost to remove the trailers and=resto.re the - site shall be qad to tie City prior to the issuance of building permits, ;to insure the' timely compliance with this" .condtion.< The'depos.it shall" have a cash value"`,af.not less than, $5,0,00. In" addition, a right of ;entry, "grant€d to tFie" City. of •rancho': Cucamonga , shall be filed With tine '`tanning,Division. "prior'",to issuance of building permits.., 9. All existing landscaped areas'shall be healthy and thr"iving"�t the time of "occupancy. of_;Ahase" One. All dead, damaged, ' t '. diseased, or decaying .plant:material .shall.:be replaced per,. hex approved landscape plan prior,to receiving occupancy of the new structure. - Engineering Division: T. The most northerly],-drive appro, cCW 'on Beryl Avenue shall be. reduced in width to 35 feet at the"property' line and the-center ` median island removed. ' The street .improvement plans shall revised to the satisfaction of the City "Enginear ,prior; to 1the.- issuance of building permits. 2. A con, on permit shall" be obtained and 'a surety posted prior to work being performed "in the public'.right-of way, 6, The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. _ r > (� 5 t hY .Y J t t r^ .a, �f PLANNING COMMIS.f, N RESOLUTION N0. CUP 89.26 Of;QKITY BAPTIST CHURCH V April 25,:199G:` Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED JHIS 257'H DAY � ;,APRIL,. I990; .. PLANNING COMh1I,SSION "OF THE CITY Of RANCHO Ci;wAMDNGA ' BY: Larry'T. McNeal,` Chairman ATTEST: Brad'Bu ler,"Secretary I, Brad Buller, :Secretary of the Planning Comnisstgn 'q the :,City of Rancho Cucamonga. do hereby certify, that ,the foregoing' Resglutaon was duly and ` regularly'introduced; passed, ;and adopted bv-.the Planning, Commission of the , City of Rancho. Cucamonga, at a ,regular meeting of the Planning Commission held- on the 25th day`o;f April., 1990, by the following +rote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: J ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: it C .1, z _y C4 7 �09 7 dd . s d v , t r�b Q d v 9 J O 0 R41 '•rGy 4a lOJ!rp !r'rd ab 4;10, J r 4r 0& J�9 �lR r4P t9 plva., r�Adr ,000 rva 4!O�,ciLi!!dP'ewyr Q'•.to�p C�bbri?.�/yt6Wa/q R.�s''R ar.�,e y/3°rs1O�!!/ g aIle. ° a0! 6 r � ry r.�PJ�4l/rl o rrfiiatrll/oh Jp•4/PR 4lol�a�,°��p7'j ti6i re4io oiJ 4, 11 �VO yrk r4j* 4p`p 4 ,Yp / dr4/!! lvarara.k�r.4p try o 19 L °oJ tr 94r �Sar 4 4j fib o rto°v r/t yda'S"ROT //Pr Ra° 4p! .d9 tf lO! lt• t (d,�a!A 191� d RaO aId//lr, 'r4p(PQt+ir dy�/r/J tij dpa0 Qpj/°r/ a�Ia Oy�O W." 9 rO s`4 p( /RI� pJ lP�oq+wv s ra/r/ a Qr �/!PbOWra 4°j (/4 I •`O/ �RP•� t4f<9 �/O dd'�a �4j' ry rJ dt PS 4p/P !J '► OJ°r R Yr R l' q O J / , `qi!/�'•rr/PJ ar° �4pRrp 64/y d�4pRa�rp�dJ4e�/dPt 4p 0 0/d(Yd v js/ ;?X,(rtk p4, ov° 1 1p, ' 4`O/, ° p°r44p (( OJ6iq .. y 5i�d aRp vaf�ivr a9rR*baO�p r,!a,v9'OS4 r r/lPQ�aJ!loQp/lOrRv4 p°JY 1• !°r d,/44pr!a1 P0Q9rt f4rB�r�J /r,o v4S 9vaJ R 40 4. % - b !^o !or rq t p•. y ✓o 90 /0Yra9 avP40 r/a(k/ oapor r/p a dJ or4lroJlPyr /r a..00y d �o* 07ffi�R!'v .t ''. fq.'o�4ba/rW rpa t`a ly/ti�Rs�!d./brYo o�a9�4p a tr4r!a,,4Rp(y/Jt�9•rS.rr4 a�4/4!/f�rr�r�4aRR��!r�!„rs4 4/ 9!y ar lr e or\ +pa y4 r°4r� / ° rQ� .00a /eo'ibs o$,asi'4 a+r+ioPa" v 9 aa9 g9jr ,i. r4 R� /R dov r4,rt, fp Pia ,.fii I/ •Y o Sy t rr r ro 6 J/°bi! ;9t♦p lPe� -to pa t v Ra \ a vv+ �pvP g°owrr�•o � ar,�r'�Y �J s4/4" °+f° �Il eo •6 9 �� y!y yr 9ova� �!9yr r • tire�. �'• 9jE, `� �3 a,�Q�r !oy J 1 `Or'O+�'r,•{+dh''i '�,s/ 1117, 5 ` a ' ,t h �s Y P 4� �C LQ 2 MM O Y A> C 4 `Yp¢ y,D..-t .. Q++i((.tl ti qppp qg �pp yq� yas� wtl�jt:iSR' VY Ya S`NK. CG C �G MCtM KM Oa d'y�j `tl 9\i4M �NCYO. QLYQ�YY•,� a( lY 'GG�C�f. a.V�� gOi�.yq sq.YO'gp tiQCo,4 p « 9F {C. YQ C�ZEL6 i,.c.L�Nyo rx'�YY.0 4=y w�tly.q I..$"C'J-+ Ny�Y�¢Y..Yegi Q1V O.K aye wy�gCY VVY.. YC y€Y CYW - Q.U.'.Y„•Oi u�4 V•Qr� .z �.-. S`V qf�;a..� NYC q.��Os 1q5 oe� q,-o+ »G�p $c.N. a�B' cus p °".tl xe�qu saw c-45 4j3. �O C 6 C Y u 1 S N VI Y yp tl N l..5, LYY..YY NOiV6.yY YY �9�-!N Via~9 CS y- i... qC aMS.A v gs�»»»YF^ gfyO q gY01. YCL LpYM'q V d}OY.� �t 1q;.�.•Wy�y.N ;u �C N�q A�LL09� �C. �Cpq Q �O.V L�� S"L0'... "Cy � qYY ry■(S A O.~rypLY Y� Ssa-- 1-7 ..'Pv 4.r N q : tVpap O V:r' A aAi wry�'MQ' Y9U 4pM.w�6 3d d Ct 0�i1VQ LC■Cry.N 1$ 4S'q J-p L o S a •O YYi ,CY Y C O2,542 Z Y g K V p3y.XW Cw�Y G = .� �C6 "L yYY VN�� _ .�aNrYA tt M.5 1�t G Y 9.5i T •9 q .. N A ! •C1 I II II If I 3,Y;S9CN_00 I J b 2 a C�•n gg g90+s Aft Affilh IT a It a Y q 4q j J v3 a g» 3cGr�yN u q` �..o• ym 4{ o LaLNOp �. pC �VV sA 9.nn.LM �w. 4YY 00..�1 CCCCCq LIM L. N�N p �.u.�0 VCY� OYp OOU.YO �...LpY ,NC z.++ a 1f Y J g y Y Y L O O mayy!g�SOB O a`^p�+ Its y _ g.yo^qoL cYGµ�•TyLI �N I-j.Qa �ppHY L Y�G ` Yg90 q^ O `. C r Y p goL,o yM$t to.�^ L�'u SG_ L ^p■P.G6 �t • g a 1L C.S O q V.t C Y M`o tap C4p:-a.. CN p2f^ O L G L ryryryYN� py� �00i p pOrNOGStLL4 aE'. ya ' Spp4. ^O.. 'q..6Y.o tyyfi c. a.�oaaONs 4.Vp L11Y.'YOO .V Ua� y MtC NC ®® ^�Y�Y.. ..�g NC^ .�. NO OG_.^Y 4=^ } NON Yp VZ'L..p� Y.Qy . OS. Ymd G^4 C gip.C� M^y.Y42 G Ya�p� G G C •^. ^+ C 50 aj L •.^O g�`�' C g O N _�, G N .��■1.. Nr �• L yY {ate y C ' O�YeVY �aV - >4G Oq?9u'Y^� p rY oYy} G55 . >C4 SyG�O :`..4 .px�'wq .�N y0 3z�g� Yf .gyp 'O G qC IYYq �YYA�■w�Y E O•�"At— H. aN Ya>i Si� U«�1 O V Y y4■yu ff�� qq {{�� f{If� y 3 q p O. f..l N g 4 Y.69 Z V�81 L y i 0 6 N{ Y q G 11:f� 0 r i� Y yL O Y p 4@ L G M yqCC L,.�. oYo LLM^ {{��$LV.i Vp �. C~CL®GL V'; OyCIL PMq ffiCp ^Y p~^ OaY. <R5 YN;/'�S yr-NN4� NCIH 12 MN 8-�� W�ri a` aVt�s ILAV°Y'J S^y�G�{VGO�^S�NAyyu,, Q�M�Lpt'.SY►QtY..a; dIV~OIYpO SyyyMN`asigCC a S �WK-��'A vp�Yy'aOQ .�•.7Ny�O$Y ^�CyN„LLM?GCQY.'Sp�COU` �z; fOpis-Z IS 3Y p' L�CG C C yN 0;%aGL6a DC O _ xL�jyp Vfa4 NOy ctad -t0 ^=S ��<VY7�OI ..'.72 �` ,S�-EZ -la ll Izi `NO30 fGt y N�Y:N .5 O�p V �$� v %K L Y p;OYt.4 La 4� t�4 Yj t u l a, • G o V O ^a O1M.. '� :Y{� � cc�.y�CoS^.v M O � Y` �5. q>:N .�M �� L 9O t V >O U.'G8 i aN' s q 3� vM 6twJ, Ntif 'S W'a OS3Z,b.�,� s a^4 t O Y O L IFp�. 4 C'OS 9 Y O _� � YLY^aL AAayp: c C `NN_. >w` L`'�y O.L OC� �C V pa .-..5 f O. 4��E waM Qa3� �c9 LJH «'S 5=I eo'o`pS OSN5-. u7 G� , yyy������ .'y �� aN Za E: Yc�J ay Lg4L =y cH -Bpr SAYM Ya. NOM y�OO.�'NN QAQ,.. Y CY YN�•. Vp •C ..CCM4 4yy Oyy YGaA^-@'L4• C\:O HO O OGO SO O yq�G® pNA ♦ L r1tS 0. O L yYL O w: LLC�gqp NOS YS Y I. O..L pl�YeLa i�Bp> O Y >NO' O tC y , Lu Ol o G- .: 6 w y S _V•L t V V ^4 9 0 YNY:.n'Y G�I yl Y Y yQpq yY Y S w .Oi <.V x5C.�' ': t.BQ aS�O !0 L OpLtl V� 6p��CyCV,pc �L��u + Z01B.0 L N y O Opp ry rctic 0..010NNCNCY �U{��<U �. p.TY .C- J' i YYpCp LCiN C a g N °p�L us.i. .+ eya a.4i wu-N y�..oN NnN sae ..a mow- Cp as�r .. q O.00 d N 5 H 0 0 Y S. d Q g C Y F y y C y L YC C O p O y gC O `o w CC L�C. LG N+��C Uf'. Y.d.GiJ$aLyt.�.,LO dC4!G9Y �� qA�Op OO G>tl' b q O V '.� 6Q Di q•O/b' _ �N P��o as 5: Cd� o .So Lt'ro uYpc Lq U L O N ll y Q O 4 N y�:V N L y:..9 r '-J 01 "� a ytl tlS La`ad12 �'dIV. f..l O V G~ '•� q�q Y-.6 YN��Cy�Z 7a Y�C`� �S�Yy v Nudua �. V 6yq Or. I O o t c a a c�-' WYi--N ■wq ■V 3.5 tlu�� OCpO`1.gOL�„.00yO NL�yLM �C Otlp�l v N.9N �N� 6N =N0 FL'.NG LN y�-�01iA NGO G9�06 �Y LLL�ARM O AS s •e�:ee s� YM CCq - qjgVa tlaL a N S yq� O!O OLVC cNC' CC .. YC Y L{�gVtlS �O..N S� an0 N N". <• 9��7 O L -Y Ng$•+ S., a-. rJ � a ^.ri a qY Yy G4 C O IG N'•.': 'O y y - O L C C > d V Y N d _ O _ p ypyp 5QQ5�� yy44�� o �1r�fy�� MYY pvaga 'ua �MYS �� no^'S.r4L 45... S-�dC NYaGal-nyya M-O. q= 1- • pY_ 6�`O,: Nd 'iIJN U$.r..m .O. y M yy p�pp6nZ �p LpV �A a . N �1OG � L Vy n.yN' t�J gSK �P 337'-. C fMMO YY-� Oyd� qr0 R M im. pM site I O 4N4y Y YO s y �. ppY4 yy C -t a V L O G • -V fi'.e C (ICY 1�i Y [1"Cr ��Y.. a' OP W EYyY..K <rCO.O C 7�.m 1 4p N. �'••aa 'a L: 6V I�OMw9 ECG <N� W6 aMMS� - - G-2--3 F. f W dcp KS C .rT.eA.^o �a... `^ �Vy o q ��. A. �C ✓4cV3. �j y tl ` Y ^.Z e`o G� ��@ dK ✓u O:^ q'L.� � O�Y �6Nyy Y0.a y V.a Y 0.Ny .. u.�V K• Q Y`,=u'Ji ooq i.! Qqa ` _yrJ' bi c.YN.it'`p :.r8 ty� ag•��• �''�cq o«N.'...N.d = CN V Y 4 SOLC S y.gN u w.g :L 'YEW L L m Z.y 9 C O Y ^L u s � L N 2 h ,..>1 9 q�d� P Cie Y: YAjtlW � r• g: g I N V,�A.`' ccY.d apt>. is—b. =tip .8' .t.5` c$ cv` ti ��q l DYOC s-a mc,a x "^.o = u. ,ccuCa.. pap =L'$ oW u+ u�. .-.eO.^'•,5 aGa a•i 75 - QffiCS NS{`�•r Y O�O'ggq�E VC COVE yySyS�O g=g^y�y�� �•d•c- �u:.7x. ocy��v� �'ea'` m r��N....l" 0o.7',h =a:'"_.E$ od°'=� 0.6.0yy 0.0�01 LQ.d 0.q::ip S Y G L..g � �Pv? OL Ly�. C � y Tqr. dn>d ttLAL;��o d ..'b'L cV.. `[i dv W�i 7,M. t 9..rl.G..u^ o d.�. Y.`nri 7,,L. •/!0 t•�ta, M O fdiWL �.=.,y wt`a in N S2-; 'Il1 L O 9Y SS,i ' C9.9Y.� O S • :~ �Y nC 9.. �yN 4�... �M. Y ^V6 :,�'y v C�p L. tip. y.4 yyVa YOY8 Ig •.�_� a _. VP9 .t.i0 i 0 �>. Nw 44MQ M a`.! ^.oa �s $'$-pf '.I Y.e 3a4�aYsf N N N SOS NR6C ly 4�N© ... ��. N��• - NM bmQL .�tl:y,m6 L'Alt ' s tl,S� � � �ti^i �LtlY•S C4 �0•tlY N40 ,pY4 Y0_i IT O OaD V Y � V Y S•H>.� '6 6Y�Y� Qq gy CG :Y V Ap.f "� V .. ^ YNC +pOr �•�• CQ G^�iy . �M n..Y,b VNY ,,�! � 4., V � F TiVw. a .aQ �94• Y. �f~ d.N. S V O-tY� Y � ZfG� L�.q � M � Y .�.Ase yy21�N{�Cy6i yp N a 'L d al re�Y r� CL \w.. 'Vs b�C64`y bl' 6� y■e �w q., ASS- ..�14®�. iC Ind i• .i .C6® [JKM� �► W®a � W9 arm.a o.. ci «..'�: Li.DmP`o v..�4�� qA d v ` ep ^o v� �a aa �y1 it • p} O N« C y � V� X IT Y Off. �Yyrq Lq.'L eY It u c:ou� ^17 dy N NdYy Lq ' wD.G�.. uao�ppa Sa■ aY m. R d: yQ�CCm�. IDrO O q.an4 N'AYM aY G C ': O U>.. � •• N. G�aa NC 6��N G��C�Ij Y� v�. �YW•� �� .Y V 4Y aG ` � yGG 6m�p y9�t�G L1 pY ar•..D N 'Y tl V� �p G Y pp p Y y O.y DI9 aOI S L r"J I ;sr OOP`.US s b C aC Y.QJ�'Y. 6 C Y V O C19 U I y V 4� Y O'.� O B L G '" `...DIY • Y 4 v d a� OOeW OMD.... `q �y G� Y'O�yc ra ,LiI uvosIL cs qu av s $ .qqc v �CAy$ oa $ .. `cv—w«e`$® Ly«qo�p G GMp:: Y a0 «ACwI `TNY LM�Np' Y EIa E C LCl N^ Yn Su.2 L +yr Yq OQ1CLy®^ y q b AYG . 'yB VO 04� G dYN yyII .`.. O N y Fill � 4(-�y SRs 00 4 �YY 0�'pga y G.r3. `...• p..m C.. w G. ,� �C ,. p�s0 O.q� �• .ryy�: m7,t•C COy� �c p ,' �pMS®Y Q4W c0.C Cmg Zi0z y. C �y 0 y qq 0•p� y �J 4�6'� KCOC ppp DyY �Ly� GGG OL Q 00 ...q+ Y `� .tl�� .,V OM � 0 « 0 _. m p A /$$• C Bmga ` -�13G�0 N 0 p ��G�DIYSS 'v'V'�� AO Vcc r u p sa a S�rdwp�y $Ey 9 I'a$a'p�'s Ca Nyp O� ry ..� "yy1111i yyN : ; 7 r®a� •a'p gQ9 sY P� VCp9Oq?f;. 01�A BIS. G qW y.CY Sqq* YVC�O�• 4y .CCU CY.. `1M G�+..or1 LYt1 �_ �N Lwyr. YOA NOY� g n G Get .DaY•�9l :aD Ecr9Y.... WN WVV �� t700..1i I gg y V O^y. C p �L•. Cy¢.. CL ey pY� vYYw �1 8C'`� a•3LG�. LC Ef a• q YJ O. Qr. L q yCj q q C " C. C C 'qs d Tc. qY 6Cy d1� .q.Nt�Y N Y C1 -.. VNC C . -AT T�oME 'I! 'd-s" N�' vq- ''$ o'«OL a`• Y u.R' � .. -. Ta•y o as g{Mq u _ �'".ymN � cvr dCq' v ar<<j �' qtl U <•�' C�O Y. L. ,�• O �y �, l ' a§ «.,c o•$ 5.2.v `-4 q J! Cfi< L tutl qG cL i�dp U LtlO>w .32 Cw. SibG 4 a OdL U q Nwif.1 Caq O. gi�y1 CYd1C p VYOOM�YL N �� HILT e.. Y` vb� uYG L C: C C="d N Y C A i N@ C O 6 4 Q It Y 6 Y t Lttd dV.Y N W .•. M Y W L bbyy G y f, dyUYL. U .G..YU wY- N•;:U�OM. 1. o ia[Op ,4�. a•'• y.. qC y I vG LV .ri rJW wv` rd.� au a'« WY:ML LH �a uqo. Cs $ d+'- yyE I- V& vg,p SC C NYW CD.N o� qS rci « Y� au/.Y ap V a�.L y�«3«0. 25 N� L pyyN RW C Y w4 Y9tlsot A dL 6U D`ii V� g �o all 4 «� C o °� gtl rS wart hi w�W IL;fi LG 1d C q� {!bCG SOU tl'q tl gC ": �e0 CUw qp VG p • L^ n.� e11' U yR j O �N IqY r! p e _QsY �Kt yM/ LOt i� O�iLItl ®pu•5Ly/ •48'r W� 6 SCC 0q. U9L fir•" ._ y0 C9� � yY Y C i 1 L� 6 A L 4 � O • .J py w G6 qYY \ G2 t � PGV n` > W C. p w O 0 4 N L O CL LVLVj Y L Y.U> • Vim^ _ C � wITM C♦ L4:N y M L i t L U 6Y T•r O;. CI'C p rM�N ODy `. =S •r.. ... C y 7pAp YYyr qN p �i • O q p .v~` yr. OV YyOqTy 9yyy .. Ouy � yYp 4� p yyy 'E=u C M L pg•C yaY YY !' F • ��b• '� yiy q Y �•� C�O L.� o attL VLV « arm . O �. 2.4 a N V e D C Y�r MS.S: `» C d Y Ct y O Me Y^V6 Gpp � � O ~w. x�•• JF^i�� C OY a6 `Y 9♦r.Vq pp{L�A L.. Y� Fu pi A6i� aq2 ig n§„� M$aiW ZVI a oa $p »c og Y '• ` Y 6 yw MUYdYM �•�p YC CCC 4 C 1 L y wi C �a6VY � _�.9YV nwo LC C13 fy�y�j Np .Ott C= S. XI Vv zic. C •�'1dC C. qq D pv a�Yig 9ZL a A r �y gyp_ pgp a Aso � $ d N Y L �fi �..w Va.u�Y pY p C �Y ^V H4• Oy aSQf' CL,�pI. iu O i 6^ L ice. dD L yywYp 'YL�p w� by 3p1ICC..DL -�M»C' Y^� Q2+ s ru.$ H O Yl i.° GFTIt OF-RANCHO CUCA IONGA MY g 1 A 1 1 i DATE: April 25,. 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning tommission F Brad Buller, City;,Planner BY Anna-List HeCnande�p Assistant Planner t4jS JECT:.. ENVIRJNM'ENTAI" ASSES5�iENT' AND: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT`9b-07 RANCHD' HILLS MINISTRY CENTER A req�iest-:to', eg�abl�sh=°a 4,320 sgtim foot thatch. office :and meets g;hall .for^ church related 'gatherings .in an existing lnd,u$urialpark in they Gone.ral Industrial, Distric,t,, Suberea 3.of"the Indusirial Specific Plan, located .a . 939C 7th Street, "Su'itLa C APN: 209-17I 57:' Staff requests.. that , onditiona7 Use permit 90 0 be 'con$inHed to.• the a May 23, 1990 Planning:CommisS�on meeting.' The ioplica'nt has consented 1 to the continuation" (see attached letter). Adrlttional ,time 79,needed to r evi ew the.proposal and to obtain, conments,from the Sheriff's•.he,far wne t and the Fire District. ` BB:AtH:Mg ° Attachment CI l� n I'. F y ^'Em D, A j RANCHQ`�IT.,7 i CdAiHQtd£2Y C1KtJR�S � ;�t TO: ANXA LISk, PLANNERS CITY QF"R?�P1CTT0'.CUCAMONGA �APRIL11019'90 t FROM: RICHARILDAHL, BOARD ;iEMBER I RANCHO Hitt COMMUI ITY.,CHORCH. ` SUEJECT:,REQUEST FOR Cu'? 90�O;-t CTENSIOtt t Tk IS LETTER TO REPRESENTS 'OUR, AGFtEEME13T T0.'EXTENRTNG y `• OUR PLANNING COMMISSION iftOING DATE. FROM,MAY 3 .T0 .MAY>: L 1990 " SIMERELY,� RICH.ARD DAHL,� n r QOARli MEMBER E V. PAW f I h !C' Y � f CITY 0 `RANCHO CUCAD4JNGA REPORT DATE: April 250 1990 TO: Chairman�,. and Members of the Planning C4ssni..� on F FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil £njineer SY: Ping Kho, Assistant Civil' Engineer SUBJECT; ENVIROWNTAI ASSESSMENT' AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MO'1312'3 MISSION 3uridivision—OT 11.13 acres OT lanleMtV prce s n e enerali�lndustrial District (Su0area 11) of. Ud Tndgstria7' Specific Plan, `,located at, the 'southwest corner of 6th street and. Buffalo Avenue (A�'N 22946B3 23, 24; I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIIjTION: A. Action 'Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map a s owe on tx i b 'B B. Parcel Size;: Parcel 1•-,S.Dg acres Parcel 2 - 5.4?. acres Parcel 3 - 2.28 acres. ' Parcel 4.- $.34.acres (( TOTAL 37.73 acres C'. Existing Zoning: Genera5 indust �al.(Subaraa 11-y D. Surrounding a.and Use: or - x s ng n ustrial building South,- Vacant East Existing industrial building and vacant West - Existing fNdustrial building and vacant v E. Surroundito-,General, Plan and Developmwt Code aesignat#ons: or, nene!a South Int,strtAl Park (Subarea:12) East General Industrial (Subarea 13.) Wet General Industrial (Subarea 11) F. site Characteristics: The :alto is: vacant and siopestgently o tSe sou 4 ITEM E PLAI3NING.`COi�BISSION STAfF REPORT 'I " :ti TENT .PARCEL"MAPS 13123 ALAND�CO. APR?L 25,11994.;''. PAGE"2 ANALYSIS—,- the purpose of the parcel. map is to consoljdate�eight,existing par.-e s ,(19 2& -ai Parcel Nap Wo. 11G7,11,` containing 1"7.73" acr;s and resubdivide the properfiy; in o,a parcel4°.fvr industrial warehouse use, Development,p1an5`"for the site.are an aright':. "agenda as p4'89-19 Al1 ;pu, C improvements,vill be completed upon recordation of the, Final,' Parcel ` 'J III, ENVIRONMENT&1 .REVIEW: The.:agpTftant=completed Part I.of the;,Initial taff—cF iucted ;a f=geld investigation and.'oasnp1 ted hart II of the In tla Study. _. No -&erse-- inipac s 'upon;-the aW,Wonfixnt, .are anticipated,as a'rosult.of ihis'profect:' Thsr�fore, '°3ssuance or;Negative Deciaratiow is appropriate: Ili. COMESPONDENCE: Notic4s of Publiic,4NeaOing have, been sant to surrounding° ..property owners. and placed in "the Daily Report Newspaper , Posting. at the tite`has also been: completed. °- V. RECOMtv.ENDATION;, It As reco'wended.that, the Planting Co=Ission consider, a tnpu .an �1'ement".,or the Tentative Parcel Map &3123., If after $uch. consideration, •the; Commission can r`ecorsasa:nd approval" on the ad opti da , , of the"dtta'ched Resolution .and'jsseiance of. a Negati,Ye Decl;aratfior� would 3 be appropriate:` ? Y% Respectfully submitted,, " fly14v, r. Barrye irinson .Senior Civil Sn9i;neer .RRH.PK:s�na Attachments; �ficit,i ty,Map (EAWbit "Ar1 " Tentative Pap (Exhibit qB") Resolution and sl, -�Rece ended Conditiois of Approval` i! t jY r it � N kit s.: ;t tY `® j :r p 'L 4 ROD s9ci ; ,,« .�� w� ✓�, ~ ` Q, `fie _ �1 � �' >y� 1e�r...r. 1'aR4 111 YYY } f� �,7 d { RESQLUT10N,NO. A RESOLUTION, DF� THE PLANNING Cfli+ptISSION OP'THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMO,NGA{ CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY k.%PROVIN& TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 'NUMBER ,13123. LOCATED AT THE. SOUTHWEST :CORNER. OF 6TH STREET AND BUFFALO AVENUE,, - APN 229-263=23s.24) ' WHEREAS, Tentative RRCel Map Number 13123, submitted, by Mission Land Company, applicant, ;for Oe 'purpose. Qf subdividing into 4 parcels, the ,7"i'l r( property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernard.'no, State of California, identified at APN(s) 229-.263-23, 24, located at the: southwest corner of ut» Sir`' et and' Buffalo Avenue,; and WHEREAS, on April. 25, 1990, the Planning Commission held a cjfy advertised public hearinr] for the Above-described map.' NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS - FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made- I. That the m,i is consistent.'with, tbq,General plan, 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the °,site is physically suitable for the proposed development:. 4. That he proposed subdivision and .improvements'Wili not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse effects on abutting property. r` SECTION 2: -This Comm Iissionf finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in ,compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970: and, further:, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration: SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel. Map, No. 13123 is hereby apprrved subject to the attached .Standard Conditions and' the following SFecial Conditions: ` The openings along the north wall of. the,buildin s of Parcels 3 and 4 shall be 45-minute .fire-rated assemblies. The stall shall be 1-hour fire rated with 30 inch parapet above the roof line. «' 2. A 60-foot-wide nhw�uiidable easement. in.ifavar iaf the ,ibuilding on Earcil ; along the' sduth'boundary cif Pa,rcel_1 shall be shorn on the final farce] map. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO PM 13123`-'MISSION 'LAND COM0jiMY April 25, 1990 Paga 3. 3. access rights shall be shown 9, o on the map as follows: ' a.j Nonvehicular access rights shall be dedicate,di' for previously approved unused driveways,and ` b.) Nonvihicalar access rights shall be vacated for approved driveways. 4. Landscape the 6th,;Street median island (full width) from Pittsburgh Avenue to Buffalo Avenue_. A separate landscape er and irrigation plan p City standards shall be and subject to ;approval of the, -City Engineer.: The Developer may requests a reimbursement agreement to recover tho cost of one- ' half width of landscaping fronting his project from future development of across the-street p-operties. However, if the Developer on' 'the, opposite side of 6.th Street installs the median' island iand'scaping,: then the. _Developer ,far.`'this project (RPM 229-263-23, 2.4) S101 pay anin-lieu f' f:e for the cost of `ode-half the. width of landscaping fronting"his project, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS' 25TH DAY ON APRIL 1990, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF'RANCHO CUCAMONGR BY. Larry T. MCNie , a:hairRAn k i ATTEST. Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plar ,ng Commission:of .,the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do .hereby certify that A foregoing„ Aer.sution- 'was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adc, pied by the'Plarnfjlg Zommission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a rigular meeting ofyihe planning'Cotmtission.held ..: on the 25th day of April 1990, by' the following 4o4s�;-Lo-wits" ' AYES:: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COi NISSIONERS: ABSENT: C6M#ISSIONERS. 'L_ .w =mac " e� $y o• y. 'q s' x K e _ a a � 4's` ` ` YY`Vy44 4�ftl Epr 'YY4` �.'� �Yo .4•' Yv CC. 4 M O C O C 3� � 4 0 � 4 M. S � riE .. spill �� L - a_�� =M�� �yi� : Q4• 4"'�u M.N. �N �� 4r` =. ez 11gyppp� �y y td c vpa .5�7 , N�� :��—'J y4M ,�9 .O L •M O.r-- V d= 1 .Ar�li �+si� g�a i%:""..0 �+•Xu�3' �:n' u�' a..Q. A 4 fy fi a Y L CA 31. � � � ;� 4E �I� , '� S H -•�►t�$ �'�' ��. o Sf^` $fir VA — �.�.. r i`, • P N i A I xr_0•�y y rg' ` :Y he.n { wu .ri.. a :: M o b` M„ U�.�ga ti@�-.•� g�', `3m:. �o�S zve WLI Y Milli molliIii 3 , Z¢` < �. +D7OZ- fl L•C a. 4.9p� O per? L ;, @�@ '. yl SLY Qy� Cp .�f Mp y FV N ab.N .may L~y aqp c L y� yw ^4F yY■ t�y O O L Y Y ' 34 it u Y Y G O r C:..YYy l OL ai� L a♦d �N 4 L Y DA aL•G 44N CrS w. 9 CpD . jai .N-.� eac eYu. tia� ooj' : '.w�Rjr . > '.de ape w� Q� 3%.: Y Ai - u till i .25 0 MN O_ Q $ L to o y. a ' �o $. v.L L a F 7YY .GnC ..ram Ep— z.,C Od Op 'Op a L� .' � • if ,. H Y �� a,._� �o. r M .c►°� .c:� e, ��o �_�a` �.�".:s� - � .i::w',�., C S`o `a.F y�,.: + . v , } d;M OF RANCHO CUCAIV ONGA DATE: A�?ril 25,,1990 ' T0: ;,Chairman and Member,•s of.;;the Planning Comn1� . n FROM: Bra',Btiller; C4ty Planner BY Bruce Abbo,tt' .Associate, Planner SUBJECT: E11VIRONMENTAL ,dSSESSMEN.Tl AND DEt►EI:0PMENT REVIEW 89-12 $/IVIES, The devel,oament of,!rPhases I1 and. III of an Udus.trial' complex,' containing,-, industrial'- biilain s totaling 22,940 square feet on 2:2 acres of-land` ' in the General .Industri,a1..,D strict Subarea ,3 of the' .� Industrial Specific Plan.. located .on Feron.'Boulevard,..east= of;:Helms .Avenue`- APN "2054K Sf ana.88.. � This item was continued fi^om the April 14 1990 Planning Coi�anlssion" f Meeting to allow the Commission members that`reviee�ed tht project durpng ' Des'ign Review the opportunity"to'hear the item. Res fu y su Bra Bull C"I ty her, .i BB:'BA/j fs z Attachments. April 11, 1990 Staff Report Resolution No: 89=158. Resolution;of Denial. 'e. il CITY OFpR�AeNCFiO CUC,rA�,MONGA '7 FREPRIT DATE April 11; 1990 TO: Chai.rr�an.and Members`'of the: Planning Commission FROM Brad B01er;,;City Planner, 3Y: Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner., SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL- ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW•89-12 - DAVIES - .the development,,.of Phases f�II and rI.II% of .an , industrial complex, !containing si x (6,) ,industrial bdildinjs,•total:ing ,22,940 square feet on 2:2 acres gf,land in the General Industrial .District, Subarea. 3 bf; the Industrial .Sp'ecific-`Plan, located on Feeon Uouldvard,'`east' of.Helms Avenue - APN: 209-031=8T and 88 ` I. . PROJECT AND"SITE DESCRIPTION: ; A. Action- Requested: E Approvat of site plan'. elevations, and issuance of a Negativr 'eclaration: " B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Orchard;;Industrial`'Spec_f. Plan (Sutiarea 3)." South' - A.T. & S F. Railroad; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 3)�i East - Vacant; Industrial Specific=Plan (Subarei:J) West Construction service;3�ard and office, manufact4�,ing; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 3) General Plan Designations Project Site - General Industrial• North - General Industrial South - General Industrial" East - `General Industrial West General Industrial T, `I D. 'Site Characteristics: A Coast Live Oak tree, approx1mately-38- feet in height with a: spread`.of 42 feet .is located on .the . north portion of the 'site.-': There is no.other, ;signiff cant vegetation on the level vacant property. `L r fib i j` PL�tNNING �OhEMI55I0N STAPF.DEPORT 'Ef IIR. 'RSSES DR°$9-12.'- DAYIFS r April<II, 199C.. r Page'2 �" E, Parkzna' alculattoits Number' of .Humber Type Squares Parking 4'oace5 ' S aces' k of Use Footage. Ratio, Rimded Phase II Buildings Office. 2,120 !':250 8• 8 E thra H It: Mandfatt 10,785 1';5Q0 22 24 Phase T1I� To J anal KF :: Office `- '' I,060 1E5O 4: ` 4 " Lt. Manu,fact 7,405 1�:500- 1 _ 14 �. 18 II. btINLYSIS R. General: The applicant-is requesting,•EriVironjscntal Assessment ` and Development; Review for°'`Phase II and IIl_cons sti,jig cf:``sTx (0 industrial/manu;acturing"buildings to2aling.22 940 scaare, �x� 2 fee}. The proposed use isaconsistent wltb Subarea 3 of.the In�Ustrial Specific s Man Phase' I ®f; the:.,';�ndustriaT - 000opment consists of;four single story G�'r'ildvrigs located to the west of the,'proposed Phase IE :Pnase waappra`ved in r Sep$ember�398b. The desian and cod's ,ruction?matei iats 9ftiie, _ ' proposed•,rbuildirtgs are. essenti.aTly, the _sama: a�'.the Qxtst�ng x ' ou-Idings in Phase ,' which is -stu ssk�ne bTozk.: However9'thA ; design/materials `the buildings�in:Phase I were originally .fw, approved"by,Plann ng Co1,m�ssior as�'splitfae block (�Fxh:bif;"z- 1y. - �re�-unauthorized, change, .Ini desjgn/materialj� .Was made;fob the �.buildi'i►gs; in, Phase1 prior frrf"irtal`. inspection -in May 4� 1.988,. rThe proposed buildings for Phases 3I and II; dupiicate ' ' -the design;-and materials of Phase 'I, R, Desf n Review committee the ?sign, Review: Committee tiea, '�leinberger Coleman) ,reviewed •the site:.plans<'and elevations frir the Pr,rosed Phase nd 'III of thq:tndustrJaT; devel�pneet on lictober ?9;`14$9, The Oes'igR Reviec Committee, , c requested that `a`+'diffe.r:ent prip�ary texterior-bdiI&Rtng material be used. The applicant resubmitted pans which were revijWed by De3igh` Review Committee (Chitiea,.To�stoy, Kroutill) oh peba�uarl?;22, 1950, The :plans-had not addressed nosh of .the recoradendatiorss as requested by the Desigrt , Reviera`, Committee . at- the Er Octy� Pr 19 .1g89 meotiny.° The.-plans had`6eEn revised.,tfor FebtlYary meeting as foilpws: ac,i i t r , M� Y ` PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPDRT ENHIR._ ASSES. OR'69=12.- DRv ES April 11, 19§ ` Page 3" L. Tare additional proposed buildings; G•and -N,. 5hich :were not shown.en the previous plans,: are now•proposed 'to be'= located in a lawn area recommended by,the, Co,Wittee to be' developed as.a ,mal'1;park,:with a"',plaza;__o'r,master planned for development. +: 2,• ' `The planter% areas at the front of building' E, F`.and have been increased' in width, but not to:the,fulI 8"'.feet. in 'the narr6w areas for tree planting. as: requested:.. 3. Additional. planter areas and plants.have been proposed'at- the south.;boundary,of Phssa .II°=and' the 'east:boundary' of Phase III. .Nowever;< additional .trAes should Ibe provided , 'k for screening 4.. Enriched �,pav�irtg at the' parking. iot entrances has,,,bjeen shown. ,l;owever; ;he, plazas and' building entrances are-,I not shown *i.th ;enriched patnnR as:requested Since the aprX �cant, ; had root addressed '`ali of. the recommendatt.-ns. as,. hzquested, ' the •.Committee recommended at their .FebruaYry 29 meeting that revi'sed' plans a resubmItt., for:review.addressing the5r'cohcerns Alternative' building materrals not stractl.+r i1+ -tecs;to tilt-up concrete panels,; Should•, be,utilized for the, •buildings., The buildings on Phase II caulk use;•some.type of` block material other ;than, slumpsto!T4 block as`,the ;.primary building material. ,'Siumpston2 block could be used as an accent;material T,iee;.,buitdngs;ir'Phase -LII ' could use the sar.�e material, as the buildings ii.Phase .;I1, or` they could be,. constructed of somd,•;'Other acceptable material such as tilt-up concrete. 2. Additional glass should be.,utilized to emphasize building . entrances. 3. An additional textere/material -other than glass tand' painted .concrete should be used, on the :facades,, per Planning Commission Resolution No. 89-158: +" 4. Trees proposed to"•be 'planted withi any leaserft' . or sewer, lines;:which, may thereby be :restricted shall be identified. 5 Additional landscoping should be provided. it the south edge of Phase I ` Building should Abe located further - •: . to ,,the north in order to provide a .planter area at:the.` , f PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENVIRi. ASSES. OP. 89-12 DAMES April I i, S;��O Page 4 south end of building "G",'if the proposed landscapingis- lin conflict with the drainege easement.: 6.1 Additional landscaping should be provided at.the drainage easement to the south%of building a 7. '' There ,oula be an $—root minim'om width"planter area along-the east side ofbuilding '!H!' .for 'screen planting. �Cw 8. Potential impacts on the bak tree, due' to the proximity of,-the I tree' proposed building_-"J"., should be further investigated: 9. 'The, plaza o, the north of buiidinng "E" should 6e . relocated to a • more ,-central, siocation such as the northeast corner of'building. "F". for example. L 10 Interlocking` ,pavers. shall' be. used.f the 'enriched paving aizas',' at .,the parking .li'lot driveways. ' The extant of ttVe'pavers, should, be.,,;expaneed to, .nclude. the full length -of the- driveway and •include tFie'handicap stalls. Handicap stala should tie•1ocated,,adjacent to»driveways to accommdate this•cdn'cept. il.' Enrichee pavan}-, should be used` to :delinea•te ;pedestrian areas,,: across „ the parking lot!, conrsect.ing building entrancei� with plaza areas or wlth:; each` other for example.. 12. Bui1`iing ,ent rances an3 walks should utilize`"enriched' paving." 13. An alternative surfice such as turf block should be used for the emergency access road.' On.March 9, 1990, sta'ff received a letter from the applicant's4; architect (Exhibit "A"� which staled that the.- applicant disagreed with the DRC recommendations and requested that'the project be, scheduled for °•Planning :Commission ,in zorder to. . resolve the issues.at that level.. Therefore,,. the• Ci.ty Planner.`•, has referred this item to'•the .Commission. � The plans submitted for Planning Conznission; are .the same as that submitted for the fast Design Review. ;flone.of the Design Review Committee,recommendations or comments from.the February meeting have been° addressed,. except ;verification that trees. cannot be planted within the City drainage easemegt and that the location of the proposed :building') should not,impactthe . : roots of: he existing Oak tree.' t� FtANNINd.COMMISSTON STAFF REPORT ENVIR.-ASSES. ,DR DAVIES . April li, J9907 6 Page_ Staff also`gotes.that,the .project design is Inconsistent,with.', #c Planning" Commission ,:Resolution Na; 89-158, "adopted lon� December 13; 1989, in the fol;lewiRg areas., a, r The architec ure dpec not "project ,a`; high quality,v` progressive`, sophist'icate'd style :of de'yelopment_u b. `.Only one primary' bidding material ;fis proposed Wumpstbne ;.block) versus, the minimum two',, pmipary building materials'regyired. ; c. - The.proposed slumpstone black is not''reprinentative 'of the desired "textured block" mateMal; recommended for primary building material's." C. Tree Preservation An arborist-report'has been completed:for the subr3ecx property providing -recomiterditions for °the preservation .,of a 38=foot , tall',,Coast Live,,Oak .tree on the .Phase IrI port -ion, of .the site,.:, One of the preservation techniques V-S* that ;no. trenching deeper than 8,inches be done'.within;,I5 'feet'of the tree- trunk, If' 'the`bcr'iiding '"J� location `,is.'approved}..as . proposed, :the .arborist 'recomme ds , 'that areation units be w' insta}led at grade; A. key issae with 'respect, to',,preseryiog the':a k .tree is the loeatiat:. of :the proposed building- . ".feet,' .from the tree trunk the} tree: has aI: ma -imuij crown spread=•of 42 fee,t. Building " " is:'approximately 22 feet. n height. Construction of Building: "J" would 'necess.itate.remavai of .approximately 10., feet of- the crown on the'west.side-of:the tree to heigfit;of =! about,24.feeL from finished grade. It' ."s staffs opirtian tFaiq 3 severe prdn:i�� ' :oul�► "be necessary treating,'.a�! unaesthet1c appearance itt',I.pe shape of: the 'tree.` Staff;recommends Lhat . the site plan 'be modified to`eliminate' tfie,pecessity for-: . removal -of .any of the tree crown.,ar.d .that na.building" s3rould be local"ed within :the drfpline of the Oak tree. . An unidentified 30 foot 'high deciduous tree; which was. riot located an the applscant`s pianShauTd 'aiso 6e pre'served with the Oak tree in staffs opon. Its sta'ff`s recommendation . that the site plan foi< Phase` YIY be; modified to accommodate` . preservation,,-of both t(e Oak'' tree .:and the unidentified deciduous tree." yY 4: VY PLANNISiG COME ISSION "STP F REPORT e ENVIR, ASSES. i3R 89-12 - DAVIES Apriv.Ul9 1990, Page S, O . T echnual Review :Committee. The .Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on October 17, 1989'and determined that with certain standard an9 special conditions of-approval:,, the project mould be•consistent with. appl'idable standards r E. Environmental Assessments Part I of the initial :Study has been> com 1.eted b <th.e'P a lica Y. pp nt'o .Staff,has 'completed Part:'II of the :E vieonmehtal Checkli t� st and found no s' gnaficant adverse;env ronRental ..impacts as• the .resuIt.:of this,:.pro ject iII. Facts for Findings: The followingF'tindings are prodded for t)►e -, Commission's consideration: I} The proposed `architecturaY'.'designs-,are incompatible wiaii_ the nvera.11 desigm goal ; of ahe Gerieral'Plan 2) 'The proposed designs are Anconsistent.'with' the phy's'ical form and appearance ;,requirements.<<of the= Lndustriai `Speci°fit PIan's§ ,Urba t Design 'Cgncep+ - 3) The recisions to therproposed plans as.recomnended_by the 6esignll Review Committee are , appropriate, 'giVen" ahe appearance of dt46r buildings; of i nila'r `use with 10 ,the, z . City: V1. RECONlMENOATION: : Staff rec'bmmends' that 'the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1) Deny. 'h request through `the'adaption of the'"attached ` Resolution. > 2) Continue the request to-allow the applicant,-to,develop a design which_''fleets, the recommendation of the Oesi,gn Reei Committ®e: Di r ci" staff to prepare a„ Resolution,, with specific co d" 'ions of.approval to -be•=,brought back to Planning C issio for. adoption Resp ctfully itte Brad Bulls A City Plan a"r .,< Sj BB:BA:sp, S F 7 PLANNING CbMMISSIQN STAFF RIEPORl ENVIR. ASSES,' OR 89=12 DAMES April '.11,,.i9,90 Page 7 Attachments: 7Exhibit °A" Letter from Ai-chitest Exhibii! "8" Vicinity Map Exhibit "C"-, Site Utiliiation Mao , Exhibit "0"' - Typidal - ite Perspe+.tiye Exhibit "E" - hlaster� Sii:e'Plan Exh.ib;it "F".;- 5�tc�'.�aians, Exh.ibtt "6" 8ui[i} ng Elevatibrls; Exhibit n.B." Trash Er�clasure .Plans Exhibit "I" Grading.Plans Exhibit tandsadpe Plans zFiibt "K" Photographs-;of`Trees ,k ResolUtioq Nb.- 89-l5$ - Design Policze� y. Resolutfort of W4 it 2 i' )r i� •r r�- 1" ,. r JJ Y As'ahitecture • Planning-• Urban Design Interiors Member American Institute of Architects 10722 Arrow Route Suite 604 Rancho Cucamonga.CA 9t:730 "i su I i`S:J® 714-987-76Y3 -- ::ay OF s He Glw-10I?af fAX 714-9�u-S730 DIANN Nr 09 6AAR March 6, 1990 p� I CITY OF MANCHO CUCAMONuA Pt >NNINC DIVISION " 9340-S Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga; CA 91730 Attention: Mr. Bruce Abbott Associate Planner s Regarding: Davies Industrial Park Architect Job No. '167-022�003 Dear Mr. Abbott: Thank you fo.r your prompt ,`reply regarding the Developmerit Rev IeW Comments for our Davies Industrial Park project. You! experi;erg, .gs greatly' appreciated. Garda & Associates and our client have carefully studied the Design Review Committee's 'commentsa We were dismayed to find' that 9;he progress needed for us to arrive to a satisfactory solution has yet to be attained. Since our client- disagrees with the recommendations, we have ,reached the conclusion that it would be best for all parties involved to have this matter resolved at the<comniss-ion level. Having said that, We ask. that our project be scheduled for 'the next. Planning Commission agenda.. Finally, - l " would like to personally thank you for all of 'your cooperation and' hard work over the past f`w years. If you should have any questions` or comments regarding the topic covered, please feel free to contact me Respectfully, CAR to If S S AR I ACTS ; e a, to in pal al c.f cc: Mr. Bill Davies, Owner File .r �t � l 1 _ E7 CaHT1=E ST• ` U a NOUMM ilid _ - Ot� � � .............. \ ♦ \\ s (� ;� LI = ' baa pa ME A& A& m m ORR, �cl, ntUF"lTI' V 0 ,R :I OT L c' �t J r r K V'� s 00 E51roHr14-46;^ VICINITY MAP, 00 r eeaaaaaaaln9e ChAva , hL Sun, 4 I I I . r K¢rrae•at i - r. Man—n _ Y _ t �s Yea. 4 Av (� F L r rfr �,I TY, \''yyam • L 9eu.x'�t�- f J r ,� .o.a.— em tH T 9 3avHd ' 1l �(liw8e!'4YSEl-LS N1t S� saaas�ooss�r�®ja,�sp S33AiC0 �! ► z ¢ - _ Ni IV aa• q Ix Matta -------------------- 7-77*7 I $ a a S s as :a r ° S. ? y£ '$ al IFJIB it Nil Ago 1 i f7 f J — r—•c----�� — M.i�- --_ _ -_-- _ _� Q • � ..pl`f.i� L ww. � ' p ilia, .13 .7F T11 Ail tj tcrs�' LLI �. ro' '. JQ mA!7 i _ p _l t --,0;— e .Ldl JtH s� 51 # IZ go #� >t w I�i�llli! ®a E�*r t I 1 po' all f LU cc ! EII: pCC $ K Ui Lu ���. � , •, .� .i.. I,: ���' �� �? ,hill � C1: �- �� � I It Hit �It J I cc to ! ' \. IN „qqT Ow — zp � � _YH .tuj �• • ZH— yII ,.-- �,'..c i :si i!'• 01i ' z '� WC`"" e+` ,� � ,. I �? td,.S � � `�::•. ,.� �. i Wit• ���€- � �>1�'-'•'`�yc 'j - min ZS lop Ul LU ;ljul LI ILI ; I8 cc 114 I rl 1 '� rf�l lllllill,l: r I' a uj 106 if fall hit Ii F17 tt�sa'oo®s fy�eys.cs� .T+a�w 1�' •'� b t �7771 i a t 91 R A j Ya tt ..--.P.y F . R > Lu w . I. FD i5. i, 1 iji t!,}, •Iu •tl1.?f it +t i � j -ljf i=i�� ltit if�1 1.:, ---r ! !�t 11t •1 ,t tassrc— ii-fit f tt[l��+g 1 t1 ai="1,S t•�•• • i1 t1 fU t F' ilk t ,1t1 ait<dt 1 s d (L fill.1 ,!t1, ,7,,,Il,t F 1,IY , Z.'rit 11i41,�i,�1 [ y�: + $ J1.1..;; 1i ! '�,?I " aims � tl i11o=i 1{1 [ 1 ! 1 • ! , a t1! 1 1 ,+s.!, 17• a s1 1.��:, i1 i r a � 151 � �11`+[tP°�ij$({{�1$�j1it�� JI j}+b[t4pt1"'3 it a�1t 9'711 �1aat t• a!" �- �@t� t�• f �t , dd�J z °� �t+1 t'l��� H3 ���, ,[ t!7(�r ti yg g+ 1t€'11a+�91�ft1 rri;a•ieittp1�ltfttjl l�l�'I�,t�_ '11111!lii�rl�il tib S ,lJ�,I,.Itill,tlZ€}i!}i!lsJltaiilJJEl+il�{atl3zid}! , t Y a 14 a INZ It— S � �I 1t }t#* - �. Ea us lit- fill 1;� x,1 titttt�i,#j!@ • tltt : } t #t,itt.s�,�s}l#t?! ..y.�j��i Emiljjll};t,i,t!t t4 i�]}t= 11 li #� 1 i,! }i,j i f Ei i ' ,# t x �; F,1 �,! laii jtll ti�j•#j!}x rj t+�j}}sZi♦st tj i}r , y q . t s 3. 53 i §a F � E fti ' •lt�1}#� #4I jl , E 1 cx .•: tllan} r r#t i I V,11t,{lp,.la13 1 t � Y t a �+ I:f ! (;t r� i + ^^...�. »OC3 . 7F t _ d 7 ♦. f �. fit LU k6o fib if tf i f ��; :� � ' (3 • a5. rn bh III s a w a $ � s I ~ 'r_ ' CJ - CL >j # #ld sin' j � z- .R A SF t ,V y. i 4 • A $' yt t �6f r , f tV �xy'7 jv if s u yyaa i x k aJy RESOLUTION NO. 89-158 A RESOLU� t ttl N' R� THE PLANNING COMMIS,CiON OF THE .CITY OF, 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING: DES491 POLICIES. INDUSTRIAL BUILD` 'S A0UIRING ARCHITECTURAL 'TREAT+9ENT AND CREAT!Vt` USE' OF BUILDING MATERIALS iITHIM THE ' INDU,�RIAL SPECIFIC"PLAN AREA. �;, ` WHEREAS,'°the Planning Commission as design concerns,with _ painted tiit•�up.,zancrete industrial bui.ldings,..,as,they Pack variety, have inadequate. architectural treatment, 'increase mainl_,nanee, and `create dated building design and*'p`rey1ous prc3ects have not adequately addressed,the design< concerns; and r WHEREAS, there is need`to establish :a des inn-ma to guide'Future.,' develop,.ent; and WHERE AS,° design•,'pcicie- 'are"ne%essary-to expound. and in I, .tpe established urban design' guidel1nes,and starda�ds of, the Industrial Specific Plan; and 4iHEREASa, such' design. policies are needed to praKide,clear directior- and guidance to ddvelopers and staff alike. NOW; 'THEREFORE, I IT IlESOLNED, that the Uctio Cucsgongs 'Planning Ccs�+ission does hereby -_estahlish ; designpolicies for' the agditional 1 architectural :treatm6nt,and`cetative, use,of Iiuitding Materials as follows:. SECTION 1: > Goal Statement The `intent of the design ypolicies is to assist the designer in understanding and coiplying•With the Urban Desi.gr� uidelines any' Zrc ndards. of the Industri>y, Specific Plan..- ,The goal- is to ' 'r'e high .quai,f y and`timel'e's4 building desiao,, which incIddes '.building entry afoca1 point, .'Sufficient' articulation .tii-building plane; and the creative use `bf building :materials. These design policies expound the established Urban 'Design Guidelines of the Industrial Specific Plan and :,shall. apply to all industrial buildiOp',within the Specific Plan area. SECTION 2; t_lasign Criteria A. Desirable architecture shall project a,high qualiity, progressive, 'sophisticated ' stjtle of . developtnt Variations . in ,architectural style,, cons, .,ucticn methods'and materials are encouraged,. _, tf . , t r PLANNINd CO�iISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89-158 RE: ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT lacember 13, 1989 Page 2 B: All building entrance's snal.i+'-be well articulated":and x project` formal_ ent: ance statement . through variations 0 architectuini `planes pavement surface. treatment, and landscape plazas, as well. ,�as' relate to pedestrians. C. The articulated building entrances; together with the landscape plazas, should, be designed!to relate to and connect with the area-wide network of'open space, `thus, ,Unifying and,, fostering 'a sense; of community. D. The degree of architeetui� l treatment and embellishments must relate to the` scale and.,mass of `} the building;. I E. Accent- treatment,, such as . chaniges in'- exterior -materials ands:texture, is ref�3ired, F. The creative' use of . buiidipg.' ,materiels s required. A minimum of 'two', (21,, primary`building materials shall be used. The rec66wwhded primary and secondary building materials are as followZ: o Primary , .building materials - concretey� sandblasted concrete, textured block; granite, marble, ; and "similar materials --as apprilved by the Design Review.Committae. Secondary buiIding materials - . glass, tile, polished brass ,or copper,. brick, ' concrete, painted, metal elements, . painted accent stripe, and other 'materials as approved by. the Design Review Cm ttee. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER! 1989. PLANNING C ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONuA Ely: `arry @ n l e ATTEST: 7��a - r ; , sro ry { Pl.ANNIPiSa G01i�4ISSION_$ESOl.!lTI N NO $9.158 `a RE gRr±ifYTECTtiRAI` TRFAT�iENT " flecember,13, 198 Page..3 j I, Brad Boiler, `Secretapy•of the. Pienning C9upission,of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, da hereby .certify ytha� the foregoing ,Resolution was ,'duly 'and regularly' introduced; passed, and`kdopted by the Planning �oiliission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular=meQt ng 4f the ?3annirg Ca aissi6n ,eld � pn the 13th day of D&C, er, 1989.;.,by the' foliors3ng Nate to-bii AYE Sr:' CIYSSIONERS: B!1{KESf:EY, CHITIEA, P9CNIfL, TOGSTOYr�WI1iBERGER ; HOES: COi49YS$YONERS:; NONE ASSENT6 COf�ISSIGPiERSsl1 ONE r , a E' s ii a-. iy t •;Y L fl t y. RESOLUTION NO`.. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE .CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO.. 8`-12,, A 8.EQUEST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT ANA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OF PHASES II AND III OF AN 'INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX CONSISTING`OF_6 BUILDINGS TOTALING 22;940 SQUARE FEET ON 22 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT OF THE INDUSTRIAL.SPECIFIC PLHh ON FERON AVENUE FAST OF HELMS AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.- APN: 209-031-87 AND 88. A. Recitals. (i) Albert ,WF. Dav-ies has. filed an application for the, approval` of Development Review jlo. 89-12 as 'described in he title of this Resolution. Hereinafter -in this Resolution, the subject. DevelopmQnt Review ,request is referred to as "the application.".' ( i) 0n the 11th day of Aprii1.990, and continued.-to-the 25th day,of April,'1990, tha Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,.conducted a meeting on the application'and ,concluded•„said meetin§.':an.thai date., (iii) Pil legal prerequisite,s,to the adaptlon of t.iis ;Resolution have occurred. ; B. Resolution. NOW,-:(HEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the PTanning Commission of the City of.Rancho Cucamonga as_followt: 1. This Commission hereby.,spec., fical,iy finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part X. of this, Resolution are tend and corrLe t, 2. Based upon substantial:. evidence presented to this, Commission during the above-referenced meetings on April 11, 1990, and April '25, '1990, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as. follows. Fa) The application applies, to property—located on Feron Avenue, east of Helms Avenue with street frontages-of 151.67 feet for as II and 154.88,feet for Phe III and tot depth of, 393.48 feef and 222.56'feet respectively, and is presently unimproved;, and (h) The property- to the north of the sub3ect s: m is an orchard„ zoned 'Industrial Specific Flan,! Subarea 3; the property ,tt► the:south of the site consists of A.T.;"& S.Fe.Railroad,. zoned 'IridustrUl. Specific flan, Subarea ;3; the property to the.east'is~vacant, zoned Industrial Specif[c P1•an, Subarea 3; and.;the property to, the hest is a manufacturing and construction service yard and office, zoned Industrial �Speci.fio.P.lin, Subarea.3., ri PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Nn, OR 89-12 - DAVIES April 25, 1990.= Page 2 (c). The architecture., materials, and site plan do not<meet the design 'criteria established for that district within the.Industrial ,Specific Plan and'Planning Commission Resolution No. 89-158, (d) The proposed architectural designs are incompatible with overall design goals of the.General Plan. (e) " The revisions to .the .proposed plans as, recommended by Design Revi((w Committee are appropriate for meeting, the goals -.and design. criteria of,'.e General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan. 3, Based upon' the substantial evidence: presented to`this Commission during,the,above-referenced meetings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth it paragraphs 1 and ,2 above this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a} That the proposed project is not consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and, (b) That the proposed project .is not In accord with the Objectives of the Develoament Code and the purposes of, he district in which the site is located,'and (c) That the proposed project is not in complians�..r�ith' each of the applicable,provisaons of the Development code; and l (d) That the proposed project without the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safaty„.or welfare or materially injurious to proper'sies.or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and cdnclusions set 'fprth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this.Commission 'hereby denies the' applicatian,. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify, to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS `25TH DAY OF APRIL, 1990, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiei, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary PLANNIN& COMMISSION RESOLUTION,NO:. ; OR'89-12 OAVIES- ' APri1 25,'199U Page I I, Brad Buller, Secretary .of the :Pldnhing Comrrissaon'of the;r_CIty. of/Rancho Cucamonga; do, herebjr. certify that the �:foregdir4,',:Resolution- was _duly,, and.., regularly 7�atroduced,, passed, and.;.adopted by t o Planning 'Comnissiork of the . City of Ran;�hd Cucamc,�ga, .at a regular tmeetin o= the.Ptanning-,Ctlrunissionr'held on the 25th day of April', 1930, °by;the to ;;vote-tA wiC: ,.. AYES; COMMI$S.IONERSt: NOCS; COMMISSIONERS,? ABSEN;:,' COMMISSIONERS: 1 _4 r r - s s r a �, ti CrrY OF,RANGW CLTi✓AA1 IOWGA T FF EP® T 9 Y" DATE: A� 11 25; 1990 `T0: :C!(airman and<Hembers df,,,, e'Pid nning Commission.. FROM:, Brad Buller; City Planner h� BY: Steve Hayes,.dssisfarit Planner SUBJECT: ENVIZCNMENTAL: ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEt,- 8949 c MISSION LAND- COMPANY - The„development of 4 ma-Fe-house buildings totaling •346,$72; squore feet,on.17.73;acres .of,' land in. the Gen`oral <Industrial DistrictSubaree 11 of the. 'Industrial Specific 'Plan, ,located, at the southwest canner' Of 6th' Street hand Buffalo; .avenue - APN•' Z29-,263=23"`and`' 24.. Associated with,, tfiis' project `is Tree.. Removal Permit 90-01. Related File:: DR 58-20. ' I. PROJECT--,AND SITE )ESCRIPTION: 4 A. Action Requested ;Approval of site' plan,,^grading, building elevations; -tree removal- pe and '•issuance-,Of" Negative , - Declaration. B, Surrounding Wnd Use--And Zoning: North - Existing Research''and Qevelopment/Office;rindustrit;l ArLaa-Specific Plan Subarea'l (General 'Industrial) South-• Vacant; IndustHaT ,Area. Specific "Plan Subarea 12 =� (Industrial Park) East,:- Industrial° Ware,ho4" and Vacant';:f'Ind ustriaT"'Area Specific Plan subarea 13 (General.'Industrial,) West -•Industrial Warehouses; and Vacant; Industr;al `Area Speci•fic,Plan Subarea 11 (General Industrial) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site'- 'general"'Industrial, North ' General Industrial South Industr,,ial "Park' East - general 'Industriais�` ' West - General Industrial r� ITEMS G ;t PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ; qR 89-19 - MISSION LAND COMPANX APRIL 25, 1990 Page 2 " t. D. Site Characteristics.t Currently, "the, site' is 'a 'decaying grape ' ` vineyard-.with no. existing structures ::Approximately;;,. mature Eucalyptus. trees. exist ,near the inters iiion of 5th SrP Ot and:.,' Buffaio 'Avenue The •site slopes „gently :to the.`.'south :at approximately 2. percent. ,,� - - E. Parking Calculations: Number of- Number of Type Square , Parking 5pces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Office/Administration 18,048. %250 73 ,73'. Warehouse/Distribution 328,824' I/lOOO**" *1b2. 191 Total 235 264 Calculations, for 4 separate bu'i1dings '. ** Park .ng for Warehouse/Distribution as;calculated atone parking space per J 000 square 1 feet fors`*he..furs} 20. 00Q square feet, one tpace per 2,000 square feet for the area..between 20,000, and 40,000 square feet, and.;one space•Der' 4,,000 square feet for warehouse square footage in excess of 40L,000 square .feet 9 . Individual buildtn s are>calcula.ted inde endent, of.one another. II. ANALYSIS.,• A. 1'aneral: The :applicait ,is requesting approval, to construct four warehouse buildings, totalipg 346,872.'square fees: AlT� four buil'dings ';will ,.be constructed frora concrete tilt up' panels and will receive,uniform sand.-bl'a,ted' accent, treant and contrasting color band's. Primary,?nd secondary entrances are articulated 'through ,the use ,o painted metal"frames,.! ' expanded ':'area;- .of'sandblasted concrete, and raised parapetE. wa11s.' The prcposed access 'points are consistent with; the approved 'master 'plan for Missiod Businesv Center (Development Review 88-20). B. Design Review Committee: On December 21, 1989;- the'Committee Chitf�ea, Duller reviewed the project. and recom!ter►d' the following revisions: 1. Prov:ide upgraded landscape gear the corner„af 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue, carried 'in both directions, fo;r a significant distance. Elements such;as specimen-size. treesi. enriched handscape areas; art pieces,. fountains, ' etc., tould be .-utilized, to enhance the corner streetscape area. }. PLAMING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR j,Ag 19.=mssloPS''.LANDUMP APAI�-'25; 1990 Pagt', - , 2.. The office 'area near the northeast corner of B 'ldin'g A ' should be`;popped'';,out with` a subsequent recessing.of the tong expanse:of buiiding plane immediately to, the west . of the entrance. G' 3. Increase the size of the.circular-_landsca"pe area.wit'hin the, parking _lot:- Items., such as enriched .pv'ng, benches,' and a- fountain may be used vtith"'the,p. ,rater to -provtidean aesthetically pTeasyng.gather'ing aree for employees. 4: Enriched paving ^'should. -inclwde bandacapped parking' spaces, the'paved area between• the office entrance an- 'the ,;land'scape area vAthin the parking lot and; a1 i drive entrances throughout .the project. Enriched paving � should- consss;. of concrete interlocking pavers or a similar material throughout". 5. Primary employee plaza/lunch "areas. should be relocated away from _a11 office entrances.;• .Furthermore secondary, employee lunch,•areas should be; provided far-•warehouse employees' n couxt and areas behin -. . Y d the buildings: 'A17 empT:iyee:,p11-„a/-lunch areas. should include,items-such'as, ' bat, not. limited to, concrete lunch tables; 4rash receptacles, •benches, light' standards,:` drinking fountains, and overhead trellis structures with vining. 6, The gntry.waikrtay'on the we side of_Buz1 `g A should be• increased in width and/or incorporate-.:an .entranAce with an angular quV-off to the northeast. ., �. Intensified' landscaping,., planters;, low: walls, or :any combination thereof, should be, used to further enhance the Offi.ce. entrances a'nd provide',fgcal;points throughout the' project'at .ground level. 8. the southeast corner u`f building A should• be recessed. w.th a subsequent''loss, of the ;grade level door closest to the `street, Sn order .to- screen' truck-loading- areas and provide better truck circulation,near the Buffalo. Avenue truck. entrance; Also, the screen wall within';:the. truck area,`east of.the dock high doors; should be rtioved further to the west and, the adjacent 'entry drive sh!±uld be angled ; to the .,southwest, to:: enhance truck manueverabilit on-site.. r .r. PLANNING CDMMISSION -STAFF REPORT OR 89-19— MISSION LAND COMPANY APRIL 25, 19go Page 4. 0.4 The, possible tertiary entrance on the north side of Building A should`be upgraded to,include elements of the primary building'entrances. 10. . The mptax roof equipment screens 'should be -deleted from the plans. 'Instead, a parapet Wa11,,cQnsistont in color and 'texture e;ith the buildings, s uld'he utitized above all primary"a,,d�spcondary..entrances. The parapet should.. be of a .height"satisfsctory to screen all proposed 'and future roof equirment ;'to the satisfaction' of .the Committee.. 11 Additional articulation to the :veetica1. building plane should be provided along tfie north side of Building A, as well as including 'accent zIements such as spandril glass and' additional texturized concretee. Also; 'tHl- ' amount of landscape should be increased in the planter. along .this building face, consistent ..with buiraing perimeter landscape planting'In other"'planters visible from streets within the project. Alk 12.1Provide additional. spardeel glass, on tfie side and..rear elevations of buildings in areas visible from streets." 13. Relocate areas of sand-blasted texture to, Rlaces wlere ` '• they are more visible from public streets. 14 Revise the horizontal sand blast element on the `" ding f dock sides to a more symetr.ical shape.' 15. Landscape fingers _with' concrete` ,curbing shoul4'- "be provided between passenger, carp spaces and the areas proposed for parallel ,semi i:ruck parking stalls and, {{ trash end&rtkres. I, l 16 The trash enclosures ,within the courtyard between ' Buildings C and D should ,abut the buildings and- face east and west, respectively. 19. Additional deciduc`� �c es.should be`incorporated into the proposed landscape palette to ;provide "-seasonal interest. _ �. 18t Sixth Street. should receive an intensified "'landscape •.treatment including items such As specimen sizo trees, accent trees, shrubs, and granite .boulders to match:the approved streetscape elepents. Ala r�? PLANNING COMMISSION'STAFfi REPORT ' ' OR 89'-I9 - MISSION LAND.COMPANY APRIL 25; 1990 Page§ The apiicant then 'revised, ail plans in atcordance with the j above-referenced ,.issues. The Committee ' (Ghitiea,. t6lstoy, ! KrOW,1) reviewed the project on March 8. 1990, and recommended . approval subject to the,followi-, 9 conditions: 1, A section diagram.and perspective drawing clarifying the i entry monument sign and` streetscape area : should be submitted for: further Comamittee review and approval as a Consent ta'lendarf lieu. Other design alternatives should be prepared and reviewed concurrently'with the' drawngs of the curvilinear sign. 2 A revised .drawing .of the circular parking area which indicates expanded enriched paving in a radai pattern and additional medium eroa,i finish concrete, banding J should be suW,rted' for further Committee review s a i Consent Catendar'item. 3, The parapet on Building A should be extended 'aT�ound corners" fora ,sufficient distance tq'complete':3r srI en all:roof mounted.;equipment and:`become: an ftat:egr4iA'part of the, building archltre�cture,^ especially as se4h from 6th Street.: , .r 4. Enriched, pedestrian paving connections should= be t. ` provided between,, building office. areas and public sidewalks. 11 Y 5.' A'revised color board shall tie' reviewed by the Design Revi ew Committee'as.-a Consent .Ca_ehdar item, prior to x.. the 'Issuance ofbuilding permits' ,j 8. Secondary outdoor lunch'areas''for warehouse employees should be included in the design in Buildings°;A,and B. On March 22, 19909 the Committe_ (Chitiea, Tolstoy, 'Kroutil) main reviewed the project' on a Consent Calendar .basis based an the issues 'raised at the previous meeting. TheS' oject ; .s again approved subject to the following conditions,*.Z, 1. Detailed section' diagrams and perspective drawings of the curvilinear sign and adjoihing streetscape"shall be. submitted far further Committee review and approval. as a., Consent Calendar- item, prior to issuance of building permts<. - PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 89-19 - MISSION LAND COMPANY APRIE 25, 1990 Page 6` The raised office parapet wall extensions on', all builings;should be extended around corners to a minimum . distance of 10 horizontal feet in order to completely screen all roof mounted equipment. 3. The"Chanticleeri":. accent color shall be. deleted from the, color board. All accent colors for the four buildings shall be selected from,the three appr�ived accent colors, " [ as shown on the;approved color/materio!1 board. ? C. Technical - Review Committee: On .December 1,9, .1989, the Committee reviewed the project and determined that, with the recommended conditions of approval, the project is,,consis'tent with ail `applicable standards and ordinances. The Grading Committee conceptually approved the-project;at itstmeet'ing,on December 18, 1989. D. Tree Removal: In conjunction with the Development Review, proposal,the applicant has submitted Tree. Removal Permit application 90-01 requesting the removal .of approximately, 15 mature Eucalyptus trees on the site(Exhibit "I"). Although the trees exist in a windrow fashion+,';hey are not part of any historic tree planting. The ap 14- ant claims that the trees are direct conflict with proposed parking• lot improvements'north of Building A. Staff-.finds that removal of the existing Eucalyptus trees is acceptable, provided that the applicant is conditioned to provide extensive landscaping near the 'intersection of 6th Street and 8OzfiaTo��Avehue.' E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of `the Initial' Study,;has been competed by the :applicant. Staff has completed'Part II of the Environmental Checklist and has 'found no '"significant adverse environmental impacts as a� result. of this project. Mitigation measures for tree IreplacemdIlt will be required ILin accordance with the City s Tree Preservation Ordinance; as - discussed- above. If the Commission. concurs Iwith szaff's findings, then I'ssuapce of'a Negative Declaration would�b� sn order. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent rtith the General' Plan and Industrial Area Specific 'Plan, The project,will not be detrimental to the public health 'or, safety, or cause .nuisances or significant adverse environmentalimpacts. In addition, the proposed use and site p"pan together with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance With theq'applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific:' Plan and- sity Standards,. PLANNING .COMki-5916N STAFF REPORT � DR 8.9-19 - MISSION LAND 'COMPANY APRIL 25, 1990 Page 7 t f "• IV. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval. .and issuance of a. ' e ;Negative DAclaration for Development Review 89-19 through adoption " of the �a,41ached"Resolution. - ', " r, c R l 1 iit ' � r B ad Big r CI ann BP:SH:mlg Attanments: Exhibit 'A!'` - Approved Master Plan Exhibit 'W' Proposed Master. Plan Exhibit u Cm' Site Utilization Map p Exhibit "D" Site:P,lan Exhibit "E"x - Conceptual Land ,Li�pe Plan, Exhibit IT -.Corner Monument,Sign Detail r Exhibit "G" - Sixth/auffalo Corner Treatment" Exhibit "N"`- Lunch Area/Entry Details" Exhibit "1-1 Tree,Removal Permit Exhibit "J""- Conceptual 'Grading. Plan Exhibit --V Building�'Zlevations Exhibit "LI'- Parapet Wall Details n Resolution of Approval with Conditions III. a r� dy e a'f��� �=sue«•G--��r r�' � `-` It l --- nc ITX OF itANCt=gyp,CUCAMONGA rl"Eri+i:lfii�jfLAj�NllV(;:D"TON • �5 5: 1 �rz 1 1 {soot f a � c, lira t f ' s v t J� - - �,•��3 .y"eI`i.4a �AJYi Ya'.a....: F it - w 11 1 � I `n k; . I .......... s- . T r y7 ;7 it Ll jl t -- t _r t � ram.OF IBANL`HO-'C,UCAMONCGA LANNINO D"MON _-y 1 I 1__I _ �z-.Iw, r T -•.��-r ram.-! �!pt ip$ 4-ter-..fir I 1 f 3�; i , �ew�yt r•� i 117T �y a , r .c'ren`r fie,, � � , :i�� •i � ilr--r ,a>-;r r--r- ' i 1. , -%I , rI 1 0l t Y It 01 nl =r � f'r 1 •� ,, Q ,'�, � k.. —�1�.> •+ of tad €il i Itia1 <,r i Ttu WPM +47 CL CA Lr � 1 t:.• j - _ `, �r � is 1 — • ' A T.Ad�NINGs`IMMIONs4eCA fit. 1 } -77 egg.PAh M/�p��y�. `_•• _ arLMlai F.uCAtrpllp ttiChok Anscardk4dos CMlydtw0'%I hN ; LiQ�lArtlbAt 3•PAl.AU SWIVt t41M11� 141i11 1 iroMle� Sortwt+ArA`• Souttlam MADb'al � � i AtagtlaM PkN `. f i waMasM Ou�Hoou.t. A�ia�Z un Fan Pakm sr�aEs ewes D EdWMrd 4a>snx ,Ao m I 1k11MWfGCA@A 800NS4 DAy➢Jy. LTptp!.aA Ytxenm Tnlrp I.MnIMnk i �, RnaekwFraaa+°"". doWrrorspA ' : � ; Hae�a'e Lulea A m f�tAattgrn ; m raAfr fnek!#r' Star JAemM ! 1 GR4W8pt4YERS:.. i T � Onut P#BWkkp + 1 1 '7AIt/6 Mtlt# It blAElp-- _ _ — """+ :STY CDF'RAIt1CHO-CUCAMONGA► PLiI#AtG FI4N E C, t..,--...;,='t �;�pf� :: l` 1AM+ H'.QLir lip 'I 4YA. UM%' IM, s SECTION L ! T4ow- 1 �K Ik ELEVATIO{ RM190 aVC ' ."1UFi�PF i I II I CI'1''i' ®g RANCE UI CUCAMONGA , I',tEM: , R 89 P . TNINO"k? SgCN . TMF-:.1. ! JR �o . -. ,,� i. Y• nY Ce ' �; R� � �a1�1♦ s j'ne,�� 1w e ,.�a e r r:axa ili? f'°PM .I ems. r �. I. v -+� � e9B.�' �.�, ��Z' � a`' fI� a )c�m .dsi.rl__�aaaa'► � wit�',. i Y tM�` 1.Y •* `\ ��1 �Yf w 1 k s - _ n_ �. .ram •_- am V. wr i;',104 (�75IFR �- RHN.kAJIF31 tMCS13' rWY1rf�/SE'�AiY{-.i •�•..�Y i 80MEN1 LLS CBVMA"- wi Aw-p a, comc;mm y Lupo 1 sEATM*AF" •a 'SLt�C!Y6tLi,9'. F4tAtiXG1�R,►iP lgll AAg1RA,. • �Lca,°li• .. taE76> LfS '>.• -MASH RI;M)PtA'dfM MLL3. AtiP9�&1/SEIRMQ AREA- •m• f OFt1RANCFIO CLUCAR ON(';'A I- SIGN* ?�XHIBPr:rr _!.�SCALE. 77 r , �=sati,u sr�sr�nc:ate* K h � ^ _ z Ro_O i City ') . ORIGINAL Tree RemovalPermalt Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT 5 GENERAL INFbKo tjQ_N ORM'ORETHAN5TREESbR50'LINEfAR EET'OFWINDRO Ordinance No.276,pertaining to the preswvation of trees on private property,requires that no person remove or reiccate any wordy plants in excasz,of fifteen(15)'feet in height and having'a single trunk circumference of fifteen ( 5) inches or more and msiti-trunks having a circumference of thirty(30) inches or more(measured twenty-four(24)inches from ground level);without first obtaining a Tree Removal Permit from the City. Z TO 13E COMPLETED BY;APPLICWT: , r LOCATION OFBItSd e►. ECTF)TE: f' NAME,ADDRESS,TELEPHONE OF APPLICANT: "LU yr NAMFE,ADDRESS,TELEPHONE OF PROPERTY OWNER(if other than applicant): aJctF �ilCilflnz5 SEASONS FOR REMOVAL(attach necessary sheets): LrJ d - }- PROPOSED METHOD OF REMOVAL: __ � � -"'f��� '�� _ :'t• ,i\�� r��h it l APR? ICANT'S SIGNATURE:.' w._RATE _ M This application shall include a plot plan indicating location of all trees to be removed and retained. The species,number,and size of the trees to be removed shalt be so designated.It a tree Is diseased, th3n s written statement from a licensed arborist stating the nature of the disease shall be required. o 77 }-- ACT16N,. Ev®(uatr tt pf,f �esadtlorr ita + e� �d i, r s,a,,= =z 11) ❑ APPROVE) ❑ DENIED 5 By: Reasons• Date: Notification of application shall be given to property owners within a three hundred,foot radlus ten days prior to approval'.if no appeals are received,there the permit shall become effective ten(10)days from the date of action.This approved tree removal permit is valid for 90 days from the date of final map r0ordation„ or building permit issuance,whichever comes first.Should applicant fail to remove the trees within this'90, day period,a new permit'shalt be required,unless an extension is requested fourterC(14)days prior to the ,; expiration of 6+a permit. -- �—` i `� �sY.i/�����'• _.ice' �s 'm. �f I _rtr 1 , if CD �.L rt ! 1 i .Y• S �a ',. J i I • T9l iVF RANC% O'CUCAMON'dA �LANTNtING �1�ISI€3N ER'EYIBIT. SCALE: ,ti. I F. it �" �"�ll, ,`"�`'`���{[*y� -,._..•r �_ j to It S3�it' r 4 I 11it it lit cq t r i It t. Cal Or RAMCNO,CUgAMONGAEXHI 3�2 5�3 r4 1 BM' SCALE i{ .ter .w r >4 . . 5Ec7zw a-a I MY' ZY OF-R khitko°CUCAMONGA RIMNINGEMMION J. SCALE: k � t. rr- I tl, c ■ VVA .r�. �� '■ by ig opt ion vx .M I � �r ■ i '= ■ k 1{ 111 ■ 17 s ' *' 1 I4�� . o 4 n' a 1 ti O iv, I IT a3A 1� y�:+4� LNfr! {zJsY ' ei ems; '�}ty'a%•� M1 '� k 7 aal s �► a �. e p\ 1 4•� �� �, a:, �;. +`` ;?�; �',': �'t' 5F 4 `�r�': x•. W��` r ;F' i kbha ''8 tq� N �� to 61t[�'e4�� 1 C�#��� �1! tll7 y~ rr+�ka'ny �iC` ctt��` q t.�� X, )l� �f��j a .�_ ili-q '. S+ (rhr$ ?�T� lr.fit. ,X., t +e �i ► , _ tt t �!� }� y tri Ir�l � �✓, �� � � � ��j r a yy S ; r- > .� ill 3� .A�; �.: ■ �C�,�� � � s� ' � 11 . . � �.: �"` �' Y�• tK �" fib ffi�x s 'u_, .t, t r-_. '! r - ' � � �' � y .��_ �.�— is �� � ! f � ` , -ti 3 �� .Y � ter �# `.� � ff'��� � �ei > y s ii fly' :. f���k �� ,�ca �sst t ': 4y�i�� 3 w' a+s`: > F .�' i '�C � '" . i' � -;u. nR �": �H��: Y? �. F`r� �� it r, tea'; t �x; t.f� �."• c ,,, ..+:F x Jam,'" yy� � 0.y `n •?';_ :, ! f t Y, h gas i ■ t§ '�� fw % 11� t= iIIF Uzi inn } li c� III 11(iro die ` 11 Its = r S 1� h psi Y � s �,}Ii' 3 }�tJq f k5 3 ii � zwF - s 'r � a TYPICN:M7 WALL O �' •vx" .PAP y ROW ' f D> . ; eceLnMihtra�a�i E AN FM sw RANCHO CUCAMC NIr.A i.t�AilC �3II®�,f �.... . pA^c tIItt'FSALE. �° �� `=--.mom.• r ,. 2,4 k. �, •yam} d`+ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHOi'CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION y APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW . NO. ':89-19 FOR FOUR. INDUSTRIAL EUILDINGS .TOTALING 346,872 SQUARE FEE1° ON 17.73 ACRES OF LAND IN THIE GENERAL'INDUSTRIAL ;DISTRICT, SUBAREA 11 OF THE INDUST11IAL,SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST' CC".NER ,Or' SkXTH STREET AND',BUFFALO AVENUE, — AND MAKING MD'INGS.IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 229-263-23 AND, M: 1 . A. Recitals. (i) Mission L-snd Company has fi ed;an`application for the approval of Development , Review No. 89-191 ,as described in the title , of :this; Resolution. Hereinafter in 'this _Resolution,?lthe subject Development; Review request is referred to as "Oe application (ii) On the 25th of April, 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of 'Rancho Cucamongaa conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the -adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, NOW, THERE70RE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by`the I° Planning Commission o.f the City of Rancho Cucamonga as 'follows: -J. This Commission lereby soecifically,finds that all of the facts set 'forth in the Recitals, Part A, ,of.i,his Resolution are true'and correct. 2. Based upon substantial" evidence presented to this. Commission during the above-referenced meeting on April 25, 1990, 'including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specificall- #finds as follows: _ (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of 6tK Street and Buffalo Avenue with a street,frontage of approximately" -92 fee:.and.lot depth of 1,432 feet and is presgntly;vacant. (b)F The property to the north of the subjec ! ,ite is developed with Research and Development/Office building's, the pra2' ty to the south of that site consists of vacant land,,,the property..to the east is developed with industrial warehouses'., and 'the property to the west- contains industrial buildings and vacant land., 3. Based upon,the .findings and conclusions set forth In, paragraphs I:and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the appl k tion st�Ject_to each and every condition set forth, below' acid in the attached Standarl' .Conditions; at ached'.hereto--and incorporated hereinby this reference: PLANNING COMMISS"ION RESOLUTION NO°°, DR+ 89-19 - MISSION LRND COAiPANY" APRIL 25, 1990 Page 2 1, ti (a) That, the'^proposed project is consistent wit;n the, Objectives of the General Plana and '(b) That the propused•use is in 'accord ctt h ttie bbjecti.ves of the Industrial Specift:c Plan and thz purposes,of ''the district.in which the site is-located and (c) That",the proposedL use is In ,compliance with each of. t`!e applicable provisions of t5e Industrial Specific P;;an; and, (d) That` the :proposed use, 'tagether tenth`. the condttt4ns applicable thereto,,,wi11 not be .detrimental.' to `the public fit! ,, safety, ar welfare or materially inaurloui; to properties'or improvements`in.;the vicinity. t; 4, This'. Commission, hereby`i'�rds znd certifies that,the project ha been reviewed and considered in compliance'_with"."the Cal_i.fornia? 'Envyrohmental. + Quality ,Act, of'1970 and, fGrther,..'thls Coman�sion hereby issues a NFgati.ve DQclaration- 5, L Based upan` the findings and conclusions_ set fa t.h ,in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Car'i5sion hereFy.appro es the application subject to each 'and ever, condntiow,``set,forth 'beJow.and in the L 'at'achr�d 'Staiidard' Conditions attached hereto and incorporaxed hereita by`athis reference. Planning Division l.` A detailed section and perspebtive dPawing"s of. the i:itry Linear. entry monument ,sign znd" adjoining .ltreetscape `area: ,snail be submitted. °fdr, further Desijnr Review Copmittee.. vrevier+„ and approval prior to ,the issuance of t ,`'lding ;:permits Detai'is of ' the proposed landscape'palz�ttet heighEs, colV %r Materials, and any other information, ,'necessary fl/ r. a complete:,and �thoj•ough review, a's deterntined"by tht,'Desig,m[Review,Committeer;shah be submitted, in conjunct°ioh"with; the review" 2. A revised diagraGn of"the circuyar pas°king 'area whncir ,indicates ` expanded enriched paving ifi `a radiatl pattern and additional` medium ►araom finish°gconcrete" banding shall ..ae `sub;;,itted for further review and" ape'_ I of the Design ;Review Gof=ittea pri'irr_y : to, issuance of building .permits. 3. L The raised office. parapet wail °eutensions,on al.1,,bunlaaings shall"; be. extended around` corners for at 1Qast ten' (lO} 'been:;:°in order to completely screen all goof mounted. aouipment: Said.screens" shal appear as an `integral-'part of the ouilding 'arChi.tectureL , Th sftcondition` th all 1=-,be indicated, oil, the "reviS4d building elevations and roof plait to' the:i satisaaction of the City Planner.pr;^r ito the n,s �arep of buildnng.perna 63: /LLLTTTrr t r PLANNING' COMMi§SI0N RESO UjIOWN0. RR 8§49' - MISSIq .LAno COMp1NY APR$I15 .19oa. 4- Page 4 f 1 5 4 The "Cha^ticl'eer" accent color C sisal' be deleted)from the eolagr board. Ai 1, accent 'color s F.`for the four `a`buildi'ngs shall .be` „ selected from'thp three approved accent colors, as 'shown on the a;proved°'color/materiel boare Compliance with this,co„��tlon. shall be indicated on'Z colo'r/mater al ,legend Inclusive with the; ` buildi'ag'elevations,prfor toa'the ts`uanei-off buirld�ang.permits, p.. 5. Landscape .fingers .with concrete cu`rbinq and iWi 'onai -setbacks: for:easier maneuyerng shy '=--be provide ;between;pabsegger car spaces and the:-areas :proposed for ara)U-,'a,semi-�trucic park—"—' Stalls.'and ,trash �,nclosures= .:Fingers'should be.;y.'-�ovided ratio` •of i per 10 parking spaces,. These sleme ,ts' shall be indicated on=.the revised siteNplan 'end'.rev-;erred And approved by the .Planning Division prior to li;z',ar� of ibuil�i g pa~•mjts. �. 6 En ached. pavirtg,._hall include -I handtCapped spaces, the paved. area betveen.tt►&,office entrance £z»<i-Iandscap'ec -area r+.ithin the n2rking ''int and entrances, throughout the project— `', nriched paving shall :;consist off' concrete �n a locking;-pavers or a similar material thr^aghoiG A mater`iai sample .af the selected'; paving materiai Shirl, be submitted. to tie- P1apLr1 Divis on..for` review and approval prior to the .issuance'uf bui-Tding permat�.,, 7. Intensified. landscapinc(, IO w�1Ss; a comb�riat�on of these: , e1"ements. shall be,used"to fi,^th g'nrrance.'the office entrances: z.' and provide "focal'. points" 'throu`hout' the g project at;, grpund_ 8.. All plans shall' be,prepared •in ;accordance` with 'the gu deTi*i; set forth in t4iszfori Business:Center;�4aster: Plan,, including, fii . not limited t^,''landscape paTelte, s.gnag?,arid site-dimengioninc� Standards., 9. Landscape plans reflecting the.p�;oposed streetscape improvements;' for the south side, of Mission Park<llrive shaib.tie reviewed and approved ::by the Plaining, and rEhgineering O Visio as.prior,to the issuance of buildings. permjts, in accordance with,, Specie.] . Planning Conditi;on,No. ii (3) from.Resolu-ticn•Na, 88-184 (Nissiasi Business.,Park=Master, ;Develonment Review 88 ?Q). Skit landscpp.! shall be Installed,prio,•r to ocLcaancy of mny buildings covered-under th�s,specifis 'project. Engineering Division 1. The,�nort�erly driveway approach, on. Richmond Place 'Mali : be 90 degrees' to the street. , the design as shown,t�iii be :awkward .k for northbound right turns into the project. �P k PLANNING COMMISSIOWIC-SOLUTION NO DR 84-19.?- MISSION`LAND_.CdMPANY APRIL 25', 1940 Page 4 2. Landscape: the` 6th Street inedian island. (full width) froth' Pittsburgh"Avenue. to Buffalo `Avenue.. A separate landscape and irri(gation.plan pe?`•City Standards'shall be provided sub'ject:a, approval of thee City'Engineer. The developer maf`regue`st a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of.one-ha:f•y�idth'of 4 landscaping fronting, his. project from future detlelopnent of . ` across-tha-street `proaerties.; However, •if the deyeloper'on the opposite side' of ,6th Street • installs the median island landscaping, •then the 'developer for thi: project. � (APN: 229-263-23',, and,24) shall pay an in�lieu fee for the cost- . Of one-half.the'�width:of landscaping;fronting his project. 3. Parcel. Map 13 21 shall be •recorded: prior',to lthe 'issuance of rF bu dingpermiu -1. Lines of sight. :fo� all, project driveways shall be shown ;in the tandscape 'and. %.grading plans-, per, Draft Standard No; 'Landscaping .within the "Limited Use Areas" for all pti'rojec driveways stall ;be approved+"by the C y Traffic Engineer.: 6. The Secretary to this Commis+c:i�,shAll certify"to ^Fie a,eiption of this Resolution. a fAPPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH.DAY'OF APRIL,.1r9O. ..r }; PLANNIiNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHOL CUCAMONGA ' BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman j 1 ATTEST: J Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller,•.Secre.tary of the Planning` 'rommi5sian of the,City 'of,Rancho.. Cucamonga, do hereby 'certi fy that the fOrd di r g Faso ulti6 .wis duly; and regularly intrcducer, passed, and adopted by th:'. Planning -Co�tmission` of the City of Ranchu Cucamonga- at,a regular meeting w the,Planning Coi-mission held on she,25th day of April, 1996, by" the f�x11'owiNg vote,±o-tilt: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: 43SEW; COWISSIONERS: i MJ £s- `r �C) a $�4�poi.A.u`o aLio�s a oY "Q -$ '.C,. Co ~��6CLh0 N4 nV U.A q N`�agJ 4d� ON'� 00uAA eLL..arT iY O E 6C 1 �i d' 22 pp Y«C. �LVO CqCq�N• nA O.Y ��S U4Yq�j OYUOD�'�: VGA CN` lC^B O� pop.0 Ore CO ay'p g 4 r 9 U ��eM ��.Nao r�'o^u..� _•'+"�.,a� w�$.. co�o.� Saq �y�Nq c� d �`.Aiy U��api0 yy�' nO�A ap d6p DaCy�6 OCVd GpyYS^' Od$d� Q]�®a55 OO ..G ail- �d.�D�ys nn Tw pO�YN �'.'�^ � l C�p..q YGa.A CO • _ yu{@�� o2 .. 9 ar,$ y y�ley �.0 yw�Y^s� L+6.A.d��NY�6 Op OO TZ�Yd 7Ny OI O�pY qO O�'N.^`O dCC d q�Ae C:. V OI T.aS ^a C p uyi�4d .r�CH •I C.r'i YO.N:�yyYWC dyC^ya' C18 uuO.G pN.. yy q�.gddt0�'.dN 4q r. tlN`al OLO. YpQ,v_wt LC� d►ado$ L p�b`.zz NOTt.O O�N�N ^yd- iU np0:. C�M�Yw$ MoT u�i:O OdryO$ $yyY V ��NNQ Cyggq Ud6M0 oo_e "�yyyU .UU �aG Ow j,,pyp qCq.W O C a V q 0�. yy y Ut U u 6C 1i U � O..O.G ify� wooau'i�a�� p r-ooa.N cu i[no Le�fi •g o'ao f-21E! , m $V�9C 00 d asC .. 1L ~ Y V+r St s O. cL u y,, ou ��spp 4n"S•Y•o Gcq s m 4i Ca'�S N u G11a= �C�rigs a�"�Qg�Ny�7fyV^ > J. CN O S C da N.N m>U Le W !g .4 a y� 4Yce r 8en.s �pv. N 4LY Y rN� 1 MA �6 " V2i . \ O4MY vM. V Yy p�n V G Y w N t�yy{J� J Y.�q•y O pp N G �R �' M�q�p `P tV aC.j6 IIrww.,p i�VC pp rJ'OY /gY��pO�F'.9b �qv 4�Lp. 6 Gig Ou Lea w�' pp.b yb� LCY 't� 2y2, Ru N�aw 'cod $'rt'�p N�Qca $ $Ny w •L" � ,� d® 9 ow h .r.F-OYC�aL.MY Met•YU�r ��L a Gvy�w. YO v O C- +Y YA Yr OS�~Y O vw¢�q9�,v YN vy_yOy u1�Vyy-w+.y R Z i..-.0 V d l Y F C,yyygG vT : 3.M+. Y C C Y COL 4'.. '>1 v p•qG„N p V C ACN O M O p'p�C•\N L�` y V ttY A A�ym A.My N Y VY L T dOC AyCCA N►�s y®�ai'•.N!AN �t AL.Y�qv .�.�N u. Qj'SL t4�.GT C„" GIC.V yp`G� jj +a 4 �LV IIfp9 AO �I y.N- Y p.� NqD. C.a L 38 •a�� �H.yQ� yz1 NOQ Y_ Y�n YCQN 7=rt�,�yp GG"LO CM'� G � qOw 0 'a<6y�01 R 0.M a Y G p p y Q G Ycc 6 As 0.0 CdCi�N �a.� VV01 ii Y..r. eN ` q .N Vv� V,nV> q' LPY vq� c c7NS� uo w • Qop u+ Iu Qu ^ uLo�:e cc C. Ci IL m rr T.f dot • =^ �q Qyy`:.zsv 141f,q! YYGVN Yi.L4 vCC'C .1�8 C.�w p^N • ' V Y�R v .ads yW L/G �.r p> ■5. CLMO 0Y 9q LN b>>tA� YO V ah KgK COq MG GGONL �9�LL� CyC� 9Y. mop yo CCYL _� �C®�v•py'Ay N .n'�yyO ^.M Cp9 Y•'N 4`. tYl y:. C y i L 9 4 YM N y N V Y I'N:G ���a L ` 'z V�•i�L Q.,c (p��M�, gig�pNy�~E��yyyY ap y0>Z�T.. lnJwA Y.. O'q0.: =�G O/"' M3 oWY�N path 'ti_C sOGyy =• 9 iQ!d+ Q i c u p0z�% dw` �Yp, Mde '9q ..�~ Y•YC CLa 4^*T '6vwg9 CN.ypC �N.C. V1 Lit�M., VAC GY 3� O�Y.O b�'iCYN~CO yOY{�-[ VaO�, C1.�w B7H igyYF q6 y_CV N� pI� y4:G 24,; V..N�Vt4 III „Y, c �Y` c o u w r,. N w C` g aMG tc j o:. so wN �>�y 3L v�Y a 84'.�ac�''$«R.�. OOff3SS acL v3 Ga VIML. '� W`.A.piwp Ng' na.Yb qO, 910 > Q vw Xe-CvwfYL4 4GL4�wMi v L Y. Na-. N y>b Y AY .tl COr�CCYY•"©G RL �N {YL� cuce �CNr'mic- RV LL C -LSD L yC�M C ^v CO G: ,r V Sr M qq q1 4 av 44 Lq±NY Opy,4V O��LOGgpyYy QO N L G K w Y w•A Sv • Y L`.: N p 7G.G@ 0 .`P" .e N 4 w.. Go f3 tl&v�$I�L+YIr4 -01 M Mqp a, NC G'64.aI r 0-10 �pQ V p T L w Nq}Oo a �.Cf z Y A O~A Y O w.V. L p KO q Y b q C 4`Lif ^'�L i w w®C-C tli 05, �i M wL G 'o COD ai UC '4u .•.Y 4ss►2�yC.00yypp����tl Y.Y2y LbLY-yyVVVo ay4C-Ly OY0yy0 <e�L"« �tLi G. fGNC .Cr N$ N� 'CV �Yv�6V gil .GP M .i MCi D�.•Ciq<6`. Q Z.. O Y H 6L C.Z'SOY.w Y: 3. Y q b X^ �BNwQ6f.'i�CwL rrGYe � aC9.` �. Y'q"Yi0 «.1 ri ca —'3 Ybu,"a c'O Y^o v L�^H M ybJt ram. =YYO O� GML fi �:bO�A 9p~O C YQY Y<. c d r� �u V�O .ouopV Free Np J q�iu v Y S¢ pp c LNp �' +�., S. `P Yl :yu0iq p qMd O^^ AnY. 0 T. `rv�. QV= N �� ae'l.. l NNN LtCi r.yA Y9 pNaN .o^q^ L,5 I I to S ov•-a LrJ��. .Y.=. t..c oc a'ly- " Sw� '.e,u, au�I�' « ..N� ' L b yd.yy yNnM:yLy LpvO Y�GNCp A ..d E MIYN N.�Y Al.t.t ONV 6�~C.N20 e N MM .q0 urY t. u"0t p N pYl i'`t` ..o:.0 aYc�YL ^N�w p.A^a- e�..` �M iO. n:`n W.�^ u.-o�eca' Yn•ry AW ae L^:g�� L: p CMGtd > L^pp 1:'LeVC ^y ^ y e�pJ QY9 wl . 1 V qN... o6..CY, 9>P Nz �pp n YGti L y IL pd YS.e C C �? 0 L yY MywN qA sOp.bl YO ep`. ^ �.L q`: C�� 1YrO SC,V .^ N v ejy}y LL L pY�� ♦ �s ` .I NNrL M zQ^ � cL t �w $■■■ g ^qe p NyOy 1 �COV {+3 Y aL : w>1y V ter. yY Q C O Y OY V n Y N`p L m. C Y cr D•..CM�. IC �va.. �� V-! �G Vre N.^.. qG ; A�ti: �n��j Nry oL Yam. c�d y- aai4L Rio gw° N!j q:a� s V y4 : OW re L 4�C LOr: ° �r A' V{O�O� Y� ® 'Cc IZY q, pHy wq V Sg�^ Y� .aK �.H OLY.� . N�aN•i q2�.Y Gy N'•1Lp�T ..67 . N N ^` y_ 4. pp _ _ G c u u 6 yy 4 l�BtOii <o 1� T Y` ^y L YO C 1Y. L.> Qqr N�Y Y"a` ^ter ^ ` sLrardte au0. . 32 W ,+ t \. Y..,DoJ! Y�QW uCYC LY VOC id av��.'• Cus a'n L: $.`...T o ..apaJYQ CC. LEwp O. ...C�YG� �YY c CL ro Y� aaw e'co asq! d8 a Yo+YN pm pp Cwj y_ q y ..g. gL.00 XyW2 p=�w YY. V C ]q ■.p- ��� iO y0� O4JiUA_4mg rim Y^L w CL ii Y�V �O Y e �+ N Y C Olyyg CO O O AIL YL 9 Lt ` Y ga.. - -,S'^$ e OET u Vy+q Ny. 1�ti�V w. NY^t Ci` L a qqqYqqq MOppI CS � Wi uv +=yam �d• N Yp YNL Gam. py...Y vILM U W � d � S yy d � MM Yy jG 4 +wGC Y yee V=T O CN _p O O N pN lCy 4 L N LI {� LiL Y ! V Y C f0.^Q N6Y4 ��.u.00 Y.V vSi C yy'+' L.N.Oq O LYE C V 1__�OA AOd 9L.CL G y YOY Y' Y`Cn�OLu OC�4L L V OY w ^ w �uu�. m s ! III o�ca a a H a� Yid Y Y b 4.3 ua F olis w. cis +c c9y= = « ao q. LL nL..' «asty V C �V C MYN® ~V i .d.� LCC Y d0 A a Vp ` ^O•.Y� �. V N`. 9G' M -Q��� �Ll .paw Y R7+ V. .+ C Y C Y q N `r q Y Y 4 3qM' O ` 'CM �M5 ` at V 4 A V w V C � � N • V Y 4 V L+GY V C O -s m AM 1 LC.G O OI r.� LVW 0O YO C� Y Y Pv CC =: Yt$=v .+oao` .�E rN� �Yy _-L YTtIS Sc a«Z Y�8$��uJ CC$V. O■0 tSp�N 0=Yg d.R4Y 50 YN,O q�Y C N ON�pNwC+ 1 =Y N y&5+C 01w C O VY 1Q O Cap C Y +dz-1 �5. :six.. ��� �N. L v AQS �zr2Cp ®o= Yf1 up qy� NL WVY V C iJ. V p Y^_ q W Y qY Y3Ne:u " 41. " ��'► 'c€$gyp NEuSZ e�9...'rdoi m y■ L..eS YC Q C � G Yoa� Nit.Q N pp � Lto4Yy i` 27 O < o $'"N• CrB.s �� J .1 L Y .' A y g$ ::.a ;h' r 41. 7rL E." SC a® �N w.m$)))p r Vt1.01r 4 L uY9N UW Y o-LN VYL` O �� �QgGqa '� •Yr11 Yy � � � LM.. G V.� �C'O�° �:O NN`N■'- °cgur`�q `�e �N 3 FFFJ`rk =a.. 'o.'� �6 .`laIa iiiYr.0 } p,>G.. NYCrNS AVi �'0� br yam. Y V'� NAIL w OC gr OC ��// Y Cr, ■M O O dy N T epYp C G Y O 4 w qw C O A9 I�.MW� a V C~i Y. 9L. L !✓OiY i� $.'4 G�:VN NL°1afd M_O YyyY. Y LY. b. L. !^ 9 N rl OI M. Y o o �. V Cry Y vvi+may dac r:9YL t~ ^ .��.•� n Pi u u O�.L Yki.2 t9 d N �L : .o S uv ,again; a..o b' aiw W CL OC C CCC~ gCqMtLN LC °.L SYg :YES Lat N. \.� ♦—G a LN_s;S °r $ bYAp1s. Grp $C C C R My� • Lei-Y vn a =a uZ.7 aci� al� � e a aZ�� r .YL.v �o � : ppip Cy a + nZY .w+Yr ' Cy J9N V y N^� Cr NG CP. ppp■... _i 9. N N C �O V. -0� CaA AN _y +\bb _.ypy }}}yYS�Y� =C �` El LVA7' L. � raP p� L ' 6p��%.: Nav� b$°a{.^ +p.. 'to O.L 3y, ( d yt b - +N 5,5 LAC^ COU COY.ii�l LC ' Ce� 4V+`� OO.' :~f3 �, O Y�r_sP N°N QpYO.q. w_ YgC = b O Y N ■ C-+ 44{{ YEA M - az.y M� «aAx �SJ _ mow f`i a.�.i.,aM �}+E i$o9y. j$Q � dr t r ` aa +V Yy �yB.. �_� '� p` 4ly ^g �� ■ .._C��SS:. C !i ��DyppQ C9Y a'� >Nyc 92 A1] LOr �iYC C:may : •y �e�u� �N vjY g.Ya oti o c' ie�5 •°•Y L3Eia.Ar....7jlgu Y a rry WYu :91 2�,- '. DnOI N� Y�� � � 11LY.���M � � Y •. ' L1Y �r . CC V A y�y wH9O g r w� v+ - Wr N M q Y VJ YP•• Kr q�� Y _� Yw NwG N L ` r YJ o �1 v'a$ Tint. V 4v:. �M ■a qq AMY h+ Y � r 3EZ .Z.X SIB CMY O yY a~aP aCI roa:o TZt�Z a..O1qayM� Pqq �r,F 44i oy«6Q$. qijL 6 N 1Z rN N 0wR 4Zan «l7 i# + L N. N�,jr S' uN' yq L O gU�py C t t! p Qw $V � �.'L q4L Y AIL • N Nr W G V G�.:Y G O W �,. 4 C.H' f *Z -.,.. y9 ■■ z M'ALvy ^-3 Y+- VtC L Lat L• L«Y Vim` ^f Y G..IV.h. Y• « YC's Vat. vvOMYf NV LwJ Cf.� 0.+� WYMLLU 3Q 41'O �M G ...ro .rGi rM.V 4r +C pN q F aa St.,lb«� w �8 Aw v§Mao. r�3 ,S I _ ..( t Y 0 0 T L _ yC 66 N»c L 4. all av'1�r alE.. Si: �j Q gg� G lac w ' wi o; •� g4 q y' a3� , JA JS El,�,11,1�6111��, All", 1 HE N tk O Y V O.V J^V l V,N •.. L i.i ZW4: B �t� a Y O L N L ®j cl O S'I J O L'LOG • 1.iG� � A~O G G 4 nV4 9~ qq.G •pN 4 y tC..gµ O, d d A ge@ �`N Y cow 4 uY SO —Sea, S V~ w y �q{�V• VY� �� .. C b leep a, RE d�A AyYV y0q V 3'N �... YN O 7'N z94O V q vq:C^ �qpqM. M �pp`y A O 81q. • •� S.y -. A. w G _b •� .. 6 c~Oy C 91{.� u8.7 gA 4�p u _y O gab9 'Y CSC Q 4 ys4 _O� �.N a.. ^llob C�Me L 4L V�n4aaay+++� �{V4Q V OaY O4 yV dN0 .CAE �.6 C6Cyy CC yu � IV&0-0 OF C�^ �Odu 8. W.NYy4 a,. `N 3"4 = o 5v �� N'/ .4 ]]]Q....O yO A ✓• d V C y. w Yi O C p6p ^_� g60.�O �bO .—Ole pA CL.be qb�q �.N ��ATE Lq O b+ CC oFb$ ��^Y4^ 4{TgTtlp � 2L L O C {r 04 6 w b��• �4A OYOq 'C.0 p� {y�/L�L V� � Vc �Y �G b�Y L b L.C�C .r:O1C N. OJ L y U 4� Q 0 p _ O r 8 �HcL F'...Nr L'� QW p� �.:m G.�.q..M Y•3 .. t.L 1�� ��YC':$OW F:tSilO " R Y N �p ® N ` N 1q :Y• NI DF.iRANCIIQ CTJCAM®NG� STAFF REPORT DATE: Apri.1 25, 199G. ' TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission .;' FROM: Brad Buller, Citu Planner - 'r {' BY: Steve,Hayes,''Ass isi:ant Rla''ner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION 70 10EVELQPMENtiREVr 88-2G = MISSION LAND COMPARY A request 'co delete a special. planning ccndition ;.of, approval regarding the placement of:buildings versus `ift"ig,areas. alongu6th Street for', 'a previously approved master pian;,consisting .of. 35, - p@rcels on -97.196 acres .of lands in' the General Industrial and,,;. Industrial Park Districts, 'Subareas 11(a�id .1.2 of the. Industriai: Specific Plan, located between 4th'and ;6th`Streets .and Piti burgh and Buffalo Avenues': APN::229�263-22 through °7, Related File: D11 89-19, 4 I BACKGROUND: On Sepf.ember 14, 1988, the Planning, Commission reviewed and r approved. a' master p3an for an industrial complex consisting of 35 i. parcels. In approaing 't"e project, he Planning 'Commission placee�/ a j condition on the deideTbpment, `t o' the'site requiring varied and undulating setbacks for the buildings-'along 6th Street. The; condit;ion reads -as, follows: a) "Relocate the- buildings on' lots 31 and 35.adjai,cnt t' the street with the parking behind ta, provide setback,un6lation along 6'th Street" I� The intent of thiis condition was to 'vary, the landscape <setbac,ks .and " building setbacks, and to hide some of the vehicular sparking areas along: 6th Street, to' provide a,afore aesthetically pl;easing.,streetscape. Given;: the situation at'the time the condition.was made, Parcels 31 and 35 were the only two parcels within the master plan area along 6th .Street,not- developed or with previous project approval with parking lots.vi )ile.to, .. l 6th Street. The original` master plan specified- that two *building!> would be constructed on Parcels 31 and 35. The;applicant i.s'pmposli6g one large building on these two parcels, and has submitted 'Ten`tativer, Parcel Map; 13123 for anew map over this portion of the Master' Plan area. I:THM Ii yid I` �V zi , , PL'ANNIN&°COMMISIOt1STAFFREPORT: MUD: TO, DR 88v 20 MISSIOU 'LAND CO. tt April 25, 19J0 Y page 2. . I.- ANALYSIS: ^' A. <. General: The applicant is requesting, to delete &,.Condition, -ofr Approval fru ission'Business Center Master Plan; Resolution " for varying Tbuilding, and parking ,lot placement along 6th!Street. Spleci-fically, the Commission required -that the build ngs;,on parcels 31'and 35 (propose&building_A) be. moved.up to".the minimum•set.iack' alone{ 6th Street With all parking (passanger car -and semi.=truck}, behind south} of: the 'bulldings. This .desagn would riot' allow vehicular access gnto a6th Street. Therefore,`access ro nts for these parcels: cou.IdL only be-,* ocated an'the "east'and.!westi &Ides of the property., '(Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue). Fur.thermare,' the sightAjne and minimum driveway distance policies"of'the`, lty`s'i; F' Engineering Diivision limp the;�Richmond Place and Buffalo�Agenv!< frontages point across these parcels. The applicant's 'primary ,concern with this, condition 'of approval revolves around, the increased p+dtential. for- traffic . co.nfi•.cts created by passenger. -vehicles and. trucks accessing and' parking, within, the,same portion of the"site—The applicantrjeels thatnthey. have addressed the CoMrssiod.1 design concerns -for -building' setback,undulation apd' upgra¢rng:, ? office employee parkind',I t by prov ding,the;,following: 1. Intensi fiA landscape"and .berming across. Gth'Street, from Richmond Place to.BuffaTo A enue 2. A variation -to the vertical and horizantai building, planes. along, the north elevation of building '�A."' 3. Treating the =southwest corner of ,5'th 'Street .and Buffalo, Avenue as a •"focal print" by providinn. items such_ as an entry•monument sign with- acinual.,caI- and stepped planter. . levels. 4. Sinking"the parking lot below the,,streetscape area-as much as 5 'feet by.grading with the fail rf the natii —onti�urs. B. De^ion Review Committee The Design Review Committee (Chjtiea$ Tolstoy, rrouti reviewed the project ;on thrte separnte:occasjnns and recommended approval of, the 'design 'concept at their meeting op March=22„ 1990. The_Coi,Tbittee`.felt lhat.ithi proposed modi ficatiogi:_ was acceptable provided .that" the Cond-itions of Approval:. forE Development Review;89-19 are complied with. ti r!f% PLANNIND' (' MMISSIO4'- SJ.AFF REPORT ' t1OD. TO'DR BN-20 HIS,' ION LAND CO. April 25'.,•1990` Page"3 TlI: RECOM_MtNDA?tON_` /,taff reco*end's that t1w-Piznayng Gommis�ieny`approae ,, the,,modi fTeat�on to Developi ept Review .88r20 Through. adnp•t�on',of the. attached REs61ut1Qh of�Apprava . Rey 1-1y sls 'd,,L vtiy a ! - \t M Bra. � . City Pla ner' 6 B9:SH:js' ; Attachments: Exhibit ;" Letter ,fro: "A" T'`'A 1 cant Exhibit "B" :Appebved Master Phan Exhibit "C"' Mod 'fiezl Master g1ap Exhibit IV! Site;tttllr fatIon Exhil -Site: Plan "4 x Ehi,.rt "F" 6tfr Street a a Exhi treetscape Pln r bit?'GII Bui�¢ing "A',' Site Plan( l j• Exobit "H-q_'Concep*uaI _andsca a P!In- p Exhibit "1` Buffalo' th StOeet;Corr m Peta-iis Er�th*t "J" 6th.5*reeti Elevation/De�a_ils Resalutaon_ f.-Appr'oval s 7+ R• ,.y• �i ' ltfi P$J 5' ' T 1 {4 t � i r' City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning:Departine Re: AraepdmenktoCondid, 9'dGeneralPf24_'W184 Missioa Business Center UPA Pra ecr`. 8PQML.C(197.4ii + _ j To Whom It May Concern: ' On behaltof Missioa Land Company,I'would like the City Couiu;il to omit Condition'9 of General Plan 88-184 requiring buildings on lots.31 and 35 to be moved to the st ime and all parMag located Behind,tticm.,Hill Pinckert Architects,Inc.is currently prgcessing a plan for one industri, huilding.oa lots 3].and 35•merged to £Drat one,ldt bound d by Richmond ei4 e,.SiaRis Street; and,Fuffa10 avenue.. Mission'E and feels that Ehis speculative warehouse building';of apprdxitnatefy.152,735 squaFe feet'flLt a need=iti the mazketplace for.the area. a Hill Pinckert Architects has utilized,the,,natural,;slope.of the Ian d to create a dock high building with trucking From the south, `screened from'puline view: The office:uses for Lhis-building will be situatt `trt the worth; thereby taking advantage'of the,attest frontage for exposure: Tt is destrabir,to"separate the car traffic from the truck traffic,therefore necessitating a parking area Wag the street. The initial reasoning for Condition'9 wm to. :ate a:ar'iauce to the•streetscape with building setbacks,, Our proposed building dons vary with thc,buildings to the west.'l he pazking is located anp"roxurateiy five feet belovF the street elevation. This,,coupled with the generous landscaped berms,ryr, wtually.5ide the north parking „ area. The project will present to,those.passing by on Sixth Street,a¢rszlt ally receding building lina'and a dramatically landscaped ideal point at Sixth and Buffalo, The issue of sati:ty is and around industrial buildings with heavy trucking useigquires passenger'land truck tsaf- " . t fic be separated. Condition 9 iinpRis.that both+asses be situatedto the:"south side'of the building-wisich makes 'f the lots unbuildable. Mission Land Company requests that you omit Cdnditldn,9 and allow a buitdtng and'parkittg'"plan similar td that in cur exhibits'. Hill'Pinckert kchitects feels this,plan addresses the initial concerns of-the Planning- ' Cotnmisswin witile,allowing a reasonable building cdiiligurat; ' Sincerely, HILL PINCKERT ARCHT-MCTB,INC; I � I ` Scott Clausen Project Manager I iY 's�l�pYgi1,� y�� L�E'.A1�Od�dtaAEli PL AL�tY7 r71'Lg.-' ..: I�Pe1 . ° r c e_ irn y<< E' a. a . - a C � q u 5 - C Abi IF, +v gyp. '��r. •i Yd, bew v.d:Qq r � .� S t yq p E r` r, �• r - f o f C I M III q �k. l r 11 J` t All in iJC 6��,.83�^:-67, AO,6.dS��6td"6. blrelr7:�-lJ�i C4-Y1U�A °asaa' av t L.PA14F ?R 1�iI�SG .DID ION EXHID SCALP., k t • � f 1 1 1<Fs i3�1 OAS T Vt�B 77 t 1 f 1 t I -. +aL 'P'-T--T t i�yi -_.T r.�rl r—T'�gg-!'j I it I (:sr-r r—rS ;',--'--r--r t— ► i• , it 1y1 F; . L , ■ 1 "1 7-1-7 • � - s . —rIT - -IBM I P � ■s � _ `n _ t 1.IR .a�-t ,is ;I� ; t+,l -� `_ �� � rv�. �e' ,'� � 4 1 t ;Eta° I t•� } 1 � '- a ! �, to a_e 1. f ea r•' , i � ;1 I •a ie � ! 1 ►;, # 11 � 1 ;;� a-[;•• - 1 s II i �1 a! CI°I'Y O ItAlgf O "�'U1CAMONGA ADD,PLANING'® e,S10,N `.� � �:�:i:��►����ijf� � �1�'����or�1�o 1�o�g1�i� � � �i��dsl'��`� � _ d = 1 ll i �I �, 1 �q V• fi �i wa Wnul j 1TY OP RAll ()'C CAMONGA � o EkHism. r 1Z r ,CS s•t, it VT 1. s, V ■ - . ti* f t l r Fes. ,,.,•�. �' c5ae��,r�y��,.'��,-u.-,. v.-'.{r'�y.h. \���'� (• '�,� ,�... ��'/.i� ai1.. ....fin, .. ... •:+ti..... y t � � �4{i � r r � �� inra'ltt Y _ IS �{.tea $ „�K'�'�i 7 x.i +.:�+«-!.. t` ,,"�e_.� �' A tOM i` '�!'� ■®r' 7 - r ' r la tl���F1MR �` a a�s �.�.:=..-7. o�i u. ..�:.. � _ . . � �_. a � ,r r a ly. +'` --_ _._.. _� � '; = �, .. _.... -r-,.-.:_-_ - p `� � �9t�e4MlT 1rhLERi1 I� , SECTION mrkt9lK Mc I q ► r� Y , Ti - ELEVATION JUp`AmNA y CTTY FI-RAWC.'I�'d).dCA.M,O&GA' ; : Mga(A t3 flf2&"9�0 P , r7 !�ANNJNC0M. 'Si®N �r 'TALE.61 a/o• a»NF u7 if \4 4 1 1 t .�:�,. k, ►� it � �� ���� _��, wj� 4 �. ice. ,., M m �., � r �� C: �F� C"�a� t�I;. a i,de 3att b"SY�ri� zif a � �. s . o i7 >! Rr. �, �r��°"qg�{A�^"' J ��N� �`dui ��� ���'}:. r�'�rr^� �.. ri� yap �9 ,,� �W/ l"':.r �j�t�' ��u+�srsiq' 1 s 'sit 4��V � ♦�ws-���,��}}MSG �l ��'12��',�,,��yyI�T .t ��S 4p3�*3�.. y (�'� I Sri, ®�� .�r`7 �� `�`� -y� _�� m4� cs��l ,�. rr rub d - �, � x� i a. �` .r, t �n.�;a�. j`y ��M .� .: i . �, _ , .. .. . � 1 +�.�� �, RESOLUTICh N0."88 A RESOLU't10N OF THE RANCHO"CUCAMONGA' PLANNING COMMuSION MODIFYING DEVE00mor, REVIEN NO. £!3•.20, A PREVLUUSLY APPROVED.MASTER PLAN CONSISTING OF 35 PARCELS 'ON 17 ACRES OF LAND--IN .THE GENERAL" INDUSTRIAL: AND INDUSTRIAL V- w; PARK DISTR ,,, ',SUBAREAS , 11: AND ' 12 OF. THE . NDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC Pam;._ -_LOCATED BETAEN VH AND 61`H STREETS AND PITTSBURGH AND BUFFALO. AVENUES AND 'MAKING FIN n;NGS ,IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN.•'229-2 63a22 THROUGH 2?: A.: Recitals. (1) Mission Land,'c Company has filed an 'application for a modification to Development Review No. 884.0 as described;in the iitie,of this,. Resolution. Hereinafter, 16':this Resolution, the subJect OeveTopment f this mview ou ation is referred to as "the application. 0i) On. the ?Sth of April, ,1990, the .'alarming Commission of the Rancho Cucamonga conducted .a' duly, noticed public .hearing ova-:tha apl _ `Ton and concluded said hearing on that date,. ' (m) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8, hesolution'. Now, THEREFOkE, it is hereby found, deter mined,° and r�salved by the Planning ,Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga «s follows: , , 1. This Commissian hereby specifically MO that all of the facts et forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolutiom are truf and corm::. it . 2. Based upon substantial .evidence presented tb this -commission during the above-referenced meeting on April 25, 1g90, inclOding written:'--and oral staff reports, together, with ;ubiic testiriony, -this Commission heretiy, specifically finds as follows:'" (a) The application applies to property between 4th and 6th Streets and Pittsburgh and.Buffalo Avenues, w, h:Street frontage!of 1,640 feet along 6th Street, 2,630 feet,along Buffald.Avenue, and I,720 feet, along 4tit Street, and is presently improved with 3 industrial buildings, side�aall;s,,.' curb: and gu,ter and �, PLANNING GONMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 88 284A :' d MOD.TO Oil88-20 = 'MISSION.CFNQ',COMPAW' `April 25, i9go Page 2 (b) '' They; proper*,v to the ' north ismdeveloped with;industrial/research and The facilities, the property to the south of the site consists of vacant land; .the property to the 'east �s mastl'y'wacant and is devei,ped dith"'industgioll buildings; andythe property tof,.the ,west r. includes indq';ti�lal :bu ld.ing5 and vacant land; and' to The condition requiring the relo ng cati �� on of buildis on Parcels 31 and 35 aiJjacent to the ,3treet ;with the parking ateas.,beh;i4 the` buildings would re,uire q passenger cars and'Semi�truck trailers to. access the � = property' at the same points of :,ingress/egress, thereby incraas�ng the. potential fo'r on-site traffic;coniiicts.. .. ti The proposed rjrojkt includes. the following de . .to .features to address concerns with the st-Neetscape,appearance: ]. 3+ntensif7i d 1P dscapitg and berming,along the'6t1s.Str'eet- frontage; 2. Artir,rCataon rif the north elevation; ' ' x Special= tteatrert to create a focal' point:,at Ue,lcorner, '. of 6th Street and Buffalo; 4. Grading the parking lct ioW.er than the puli'licFstreet'by' as muchss,5 feet. 3. Based upon'. the L substantial evidence" presented` to this Commission`during the above-refe�:enoed pubiic heziring-,and upon,.the specific ?findings of facts set forth.''�n Paragraphs: 1 a;:d 2. abiwe, tips 'Commission; ` hereby finds and. concludes as io114w ':= : '� (a) That the proposed modification ;,is .in :accord i�ith ,the� General Plan. l (b) That the proposed modification is in accord with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and" he purposes:of tits ,distriet(s) , ..in which.`the sits is lacated;,and (c) That the proposed mows "fication, �ogetiter with the.: conditiUns 'applicable thereto,-,will ,not be detrimental to the,pu6lic. health,;' safety, or welfare or materially injurious .to Rroperties' or improvemertts ,n; the vicini y. ( ) '-,That-the proposed.mocation complesi.th each Af the app`1ic�ible'provisions of the "Industrial Speefic.'Plan. " 4 a PLANNING COMMISSION HE5pLUT10N N0. 88-184A MOD.TC OR 881120,-"MISSION LAND COMPANY April 25 1990 Page 19 4, Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in, Paragraphs I, 2;and 3 'above,`;this Commission hereby,approves the appl"ication by deleting .Planning 0?vision Condition Number. 9 as contained 'i;n" Resolution No. 88-184 adopted By the 'Planning ;Commission on September 14, 1999. 5. _ The Secretary, to this Commission 'shal1 certify to, the adoption'of-this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTE6.,THIS, 25TH DAY OF:APRIL, 1950.' PLANNING COMMISSION-OF THE CITY Os RANCHO CUCAMONGA . . BY: Larry T, McNiel,:Chairman ATTEST: Brad OUIIsr, Secretary I. R rad Buller, Secretary of the .Planning .Cgmmitsidn,lof the City of'Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify "that'-:.the foregoing Resolution was duly" and regularly introduced, .passed, and adopted by the ;Planoing Comm ssion ;bf the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held' on the 25'th day`:gf April, 1990, by the "following vote-to-wit: f : AYES: CDMMISSIONERSs NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ' ABSENTS. COMMISSIONERS: I 1 1` 1 CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 25, 19,90 ., f 1• a F; TO: %na.rman and-Members aF the Planning Corsaission FROM: Brad,Builer,, City Planners BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-12 LEWIS HOMES -.An appeal of'.-the . City Planner's determinati.dn rfoarding the plaster:surface'for 8uildings',A 'and<B in the Terra_YiSta Town Center,,';located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard a'nd Haven Avenue APN: 1077-421-36, 37 and 30.: I, ABSTRACT: The, developer is appealing the City Planner's determination,requir:i�ty the replastering: of Buildings A-and B. The developer; had, proposed to 'spot patch and"replaster certain areas of the building;walls.• Staff rer,.ommends`that the Planning Commission uphold the City Planner's determination. II. BACKGROUND- Attached for the Commissi.an's review'�is Exhibit B, which :is the Chronology of Inspections, and January'_30 and March 181 1991), letters -informing the developer of the unacceptability, of the plaster' surface. Also, color slides 'and ,pictures will' be available.at the meeting for tha Commission to".review. III. ANALYSIS; Prior to beginning the Stucco for .Buildi4gs A and 8, the developer provided a large material sample;partei ,at the job site for review and approval. On:December 89 1989, staff reviewed the sample panel , plaster surface. Staff approved the lower portion of'' the sample panel as,%the. desired surface, The architect, Tom Dond, informed staff that he'had also approved this same lower `portion of the sample and instructed the contractor to follow the .approved sample.' Following. the, approval of the sample panel, staff. conducted 'a: routine, ir`,"spection of the site.and noted that. the application of the brown-,coat for the plaster work on Buildings , , a'nd B appeared to be tog' rough, with many,smail depressions, and not consistent. with the apprpved sample panel. Staff informed the contractor of this s'it0 tion. Following this initial-contact;, staff hadseveral phone conversations with the contrae,:r to discuss the 'piaster work. +)n January 12, 1990 sta O indicated, that the'plaster;;_work was sti.'11 unacceptablh and followed, this decision.up with a letter an January 30 1990< Despite thQ;,veebal and written notification, plaster,'irtg work continued `_an ,Buildings A and4, Ihe, attached March ;12, 1990j letter, documents staffs efforts ,to reso ve'the'. plaster issue'ar.i the contractor and the_architeet`. ., ITEM J Y� G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ;CUP 88-32.—TERRA VISTA TOWNS CENTER•, A�l l 26j, 6 j,'1990 Page Z t � After severalY�net zings in an: attempt to resolve the concern with the stucco ,Sur,fate, ;the applicant;. proposed to spots patch an ' replas+ter certain areas on 'Buildings A and.,8.r: It is staffs opinion that this approach`may only'Make matter',s ,worse:kecause would .be extremely °difficult to .disguise *he patched .areas. Fsirther,`, it is=staffs opinion that the. areas requiring patching are. too' numerous and`. vary: ignif cdntly; as .to the ,degree,'of patching required '. Addlti.ona.11y it,:woul;d."be di.fficult.ta achieve ,i. the ,sur'face. conslster- approYed _oq .ttie` sample panel without $' resurfacing all elEl'iat ohs of, uildings A and B; >> • 4 , f1 # The-app1'icant<did ;,resurface a portion of the south rqevatlon, of Building, B and Staff.did _accept: the lower- east. sec ion of that r wall When;" revijiwing�,the `site the Commission many' wish to specifically reyieMfth'is elevation.. �.jV RECOMMENDATIONS: Staffarlcommends;that the Planning armissi:on uphold the Gity l'1.anner's--:Q Aerminaticn;ttirough ma:rtute,act>ihn, Res lly'subm d,. Brad City Pla�i^er BB:NF:sp s' Attachments: Letterof Appeal from Developer Exhibit "M Location 'Map Exhibit,�'B° Chronalogyof Inspections a January 30, 1990 Litter-to. ©eveloper March'"I2, 1990 Letter to.Developer F 2 k . Y J ,ewes Homes Inag6bient Corp.•. 1256IVatth Mount SIR Aveaut f PC.aoaC 6f0 f ITpttad,CAMOTAii,91795 M4946•75I8 karch 28, 2990 $1990 Ms, Randy Fong � ��sn:{'�="� �4:��j,6; r City of Rancho Cucamonga y 9320-0 Baseline"Tt6ad `Rancho Cucamonga,.CA 9272.9 Ile: TERRi V13TA T4WId ,OHk R Dear Hancy: We ara in raeeipt o`f,a letter k6m 22r ' 'irac AuZler; dated March 1.2, I990, regarding the plaster 'i 'Irface on Bt; dings. ItAn; and B11, at-the above referenced site.. . ; r > As stated,,in Mr._ Bulier's letter,, should we disagree With his decision in this matter, our alternative Wc.y-ld be o. ap2ez1 to the. Planning, Commission:" j we are;:hereby requesting'we be included, at,,';the earliest cssible. date, .an the Planning`- Commission' A4e.nda, kor ..the. 'purpose presenting our reasons!,6r ieq'uestirig'a modification if the;City Planners dec "sianIf me. 'a is 2ny ad'clitional inf6MAtion required, pZ'ease contact t J sincerely,' Richaxa'A. Mager Executive Dxeotor . Commercial Divisiori' RAM:mh it f + CC 7+jF?TjkRGkT 77 o o o• �� .�.. 1 ♦ • • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 1 r ���� //,, ' x ? 5 �_` s � --!��, ) fir-9 1 V;' NJ'V. u, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA PLANNING DIUISION EXHIBIT': SCALE , R, 'EXHIBIT B.- CHRONOLOGY-OF INSPECTIONS November 9, 1989c Reviewed material sample board fur. Target Store. December P, 1989 ',Met a John Holmbe, and Tom Bond A".job=site, .to 0. reviews the- sample. panel. Approved ithe Javier portion of_the'panel 'and :stated;that'the.plaster surface""snal?�d,have slight undulations. r, January 12, 1990 Met contractor, Marshall Raynerr., at the job..site, with Debra;Meier.'•" Reviewed tne, brown cokt'of Buildings A ,S 8 and informed him 'that ,the plaster surfacad too many, smal`f °depressions w .end it was �torf rough and__' t'ha,t the, plaster surface ne6dedi �o'.be smoothed 'ouC. , Mr. 'Rayner . reassure?, staff E x-M. when the -color coat- and . final. coat of} r nt, are applied to,-the brown.", the fir.Vo0'ed .pl.a.ster surface 'would be smoothed.out. Janua"ry 19, 1990 Routine inspection of the .job,"site '.w th Debra Meier Staff noticed, that the,,;plaster;.work was. coilt,inued 'even though staff had informed" the -, contractoi• regarding the unacceptable surface: January, 22, 1%901 Roof inspection of Target'.,, . r; January_30, 1990 _ A follow-up, �etter was`sent,'out toOAII d weloper', informing.him'of te�era.T item"s that.Aeedeii ta,bie- reso'lved.` One `or the'items was ,to formal iyi state 'that`the piaster surface was unacceptable.' .February 2, 1990 Staff ,met with John` Holmbe,, Tom Bond'. and ' Marshall` Rayner,, at the job site ;agairt.'to discuss .th2_unacceptable 'plaster surface. February 22, 1990' Site inspection .for Phases.: March 12, 19,90 Staff again met with the -developer and, his professional 'team to.' discuss the plaster, Surfece.-" The developer.'proposed to repl.aster only portions of Buildings. A' '.B • Staff -indicated that the spot patching F.and repl'astarin_g certain areas• of the.buiTding'Wall would not achieve the re"salts the• City is looking for:. i/ / f 1(3 CITY OF RAIVCIiO CUCAMONGA Past Offce.Box 807f Rancho Cucamonga,Calitamia 91 �?13)9$9 1851 Janua-v 30, 1990 Rick Mager ' Lewis;Homes 1156N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91786 } SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT B8-12 - PHASE'1 Dear Rick; Staff has Conducted routine inspections�,?f the site on January 12 and 22, 1990. -Based on the site' inspections.; staff has identified several inconsistencies withY the approved plans, which need to bel resolved. They are as follows: 1. A phone cabinet approximat%ily, `18 inches wide ' by 42 inches high by 5 feet long,i located adjacent to the walkway within the promonade in front of Building X. This phone. cabinet will create pedestrian conflict and public safety. It needs, to be relocated to a more sui able place. Please contact the appropriate agency A phone cabinet. Plans showing the new location for the phone cabinet should be submitted to '. t tannin Division for review. 2. Staff has had several phone conversations with Mr. Marshall Rarer as: well <as•meeting him on-site to discuss the fiCithed surface of the stucco work. Staff u has determined >ithat, there are too many '"depressions" Hlumps", etc., which is contrary to ttie portion'of the sample panel approved by Mr. Tom Bond and 'staff.' Also,;. a review of the approved plan"indicated tha the plaster" is calked out .to be smgoth. I have indicated to Mr. Rayner that 'the finished surface of the stucco needs' t0 be smoothed out. c: 3. The roof tile must be randomly stacked per;the approved plan. Staff has agreed tbr a sS randu1.4 stacking ti es. 4. There is an existing, low precision, block will behind` Building B. This wa1T must be stuccoed to thatch the building and provided with a detailed capped to the top' of the wall. This must be.cotapteted prior to releaseJof' occupancy for,Building B CYY11[IhRfT.Mff stow. Wiiliatn 1,Alexander chatles J•Buquet fl elty atan,rr. Dennis L Stout Deborah N.`Brown, ./ Pamela J:,Wrighr.; JuR,Latn.,A[CP v (0 ff k K-ger ' CUP 88 12 January,30, 1990 t Page '2 Staff would appreciate yOur, prompt attention to .rQsoTve the above t identified items. If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance please°do not hesitate' to call me at_(714") '98g=18k. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WAR ENT PCAN1NIG aI1tI5I "S Nancy Fo ; Senior R,anner NF:mlg 0 cc: Tom Bond', Architects Pacifica. Marshall' Rayner. Grant General Contractors, Inc. AMh .r 1t N: d CITY OF RAIVCEIO CUCAMONGA Post 0"tce tlax 807.Rancho Cucamonga,California 4 V29,(714)484.1851 March 12, 1990 Mr. John Holmbe Lewis Homes 1156 M. Mounta'in Avenue P.O. Box.670 Upland, CA 91785 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-12 - PLASTER SURFACE FOR BUILDINGS A & B; Dear John: Thank you for taking time out to meet with My"-'-staff and,I a1 March 9, 1990 at a the Tome Center, to discuss the issue of plaster surface., ;ZT, would like to "take this opportunity to recap briefly our discussions. My staff, Nancy, Fong and Debra Meier, initially met with Mr. Marshall Rayner on January 12, 1990 to, review the plaster work (brown-.coat`., at-that time). My staff informed 'him that the plaster surface was unacceptable. They directed Mr. Rayner that the undulations in the plaster surface were, too rough and should be smoothed out to reflect the approved:-sample panel. Mr. Rayner reassured staff that when the color coat and the final coat of paint are applied to the, brown coat, the finished 'plaster surface would be smoothed out. On February E, 19zv, Nancy Fong and I met with you and Mr. Rayner and continued' a dialogue on the unacceptable plaster surface. At that time, it was left that staff'would invite the Design Review Committee (Commercial) to visit the site. Both committee members did visit the site and reported back that the plaster, surface was unacceptable. Mr. Torn Bond, the project architect, then proposed to smooth out, portions 0 'tile building wall of Buildings A 3 B by replastering them. On March 9, 1990, Nancy and I`again met with you and Mr. Rayner:to discuss the plaster surface and the architects proposal of replastering ply, portions.of Buildings A b B. It is my opinion that the spot patching and, replastering certain areas of the building walls would.not achieve the results the, City is looking for. Therefore, Buildings A 5 B are to be replastered to lesson the undulations and create a more uniform surface. consistent with the 'approved sample panel. The only portions that, I believe can be spot patched are those within the arcade. A field review with you can be arranged` to spot those t f . Coanttit,rrnkrs Mayor Wialiam J lllesander Charkl J.Buquet U Ctry tlana,(ri Dennis L.Stout t ! Deborah&Brown pamela J.Wright Jack Latb,AICP.- A � Mr. John Halm6e /r March 19, 1990 ..a Page 2 r y We appreciate y6ur cooperation An complying with this• requirement, : s A,� w� dixcussed during our :fie7d Keview of the, plastering, should you disagree w;We my detprminations, your alternative is to appeal the City Planner's to the Planning'Comsnission. If you have any further questions, p.7eise do not hesitate to call me or Nancy Fong at 989-1862. ' Sincerely,' COMMUNITY"DEVELOPMENT'DEPAR11iBNT PLA DIVIST Bra 8 r City PI nner BB:NF/jfs. cc: Tom Bond, Architects Pacifica Marshall-Rayner,"Grant_ General Contractors, Inc. Q. 7 rj v � CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF EP®R.T i DATE: April 25, 1990` T0: Chairman and Members -of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller., City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal. Plan{ger 't SUBJECT: TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APfrINTMENTS I. BACKGROUND: With the resignation. of Commissioner Blakesley, and the expiration of Commissioner Tolstoy's term on the Committee, the Planning r; Commission needs i6 review their_appointments, tc the Trails Advisory Committee. The terms are 24 months and shall be staggered 12 months apart to maintairt continuity pursuant to Planning.4ommission Resolution No. 88-43. The Committee is currently composed of the following members: Term Expires: Y Suzann6'CNitiea* Jul 27,e 1990 ' -Peter Jul 2; 1989 " Y 7 Pamela Henry** July 21 1991s' "Mark Whitehead** June 16, 1990 - Greg Pilcher* July 2Z '1990;' Aiternates: David Blakesley*, Mol y Mitchell**, Appointed by: Planning Commission ** Appointed by Park and. Recreation Commissio_'r`' II. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning;Cgz,,m1ssion shoAjld review and appoint a new alternate and ,either reappoa sue' Commissir'ner,,Tol.stoy or, appoint- a different Planning Commissir•ner",i'or I,year. Thy,: Commission may also want to consider at this time appointments for'those terms which are due to expire in July (Chitiea' and Pilcher), Respectful;v s mitted, Fad Bu er City Planner BB:DC/Jfs t . ITEM r� ]4 r CITY OF RANCHCf CUIU MONGA -STA ' '' R ` a .r DATE: April 25 I990' T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning.Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Can Coleman, Principal Alanner SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO TRAILS COK4 ITTEE REGiJLATIONS _ I. BACKGROUND. On February 4, 1988, the Planning' Commission adopted Administrative Regulations fcy the Trails Advisory iomgn ttee. 7heaQ regulations defined the membership of the 'Committee =as 'two Planning CammiS5ioners, two Park aX ecreation Comissioner`s and one Large. commissioner Tois,toy reco Member-at-. mmended to :the one -expansion of i the membership to include,a bicycling representative. At their Apri3 18,,' 1990 meeting, the .Committee voted unanimously to forWarQ this j recommendation to the Planning Commission. Spec IfitaIlYt,,the,40 mmittee recommends that-the membership be changed to add a second t3errbet-_ai-L 't to represent the bicycling community. The' Committee "felt arne that this member should be someone experienced p bicycle, riding -'bicyclists, needs. The attached amended Administrative Regulations reflect the changes in the Committee membership as well as [minor adjustments in terms 'of q'grtm and voting (changes are highlighted in bold). II. RECOMMENDATION: It;is recommended that he Planning CamnisS=on adopt the attached Resolution and appoint a subcommittee to intrvt;w patentiai candidates for the new 'position and make :a recamm �dation to the Commission, Res tll�11 sub ted i Bra6.,dya r city Planner i 88:OCIjfs Attachments; PSSOlution No. 88-43A (Administrative Regulations, Rey is 'd)„ i RESOLUTION NO. 88-43A A RESOLUTION',OF THE: PLANNING COMMISSION .OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,_, CALIFORNIA,' MODIFYING THE ADMINISTRATIVE REM:WTIONS OF THE TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE • WHEREAS, the City`s General .Plan ;establishes .an extensive network of hiking, biking, 'horse rid g ing traias"as a recreational 'elemcmt, and, z WHEREAS, the PlanningL Commission has,appointed a working sub- committee to advise them on trail issues, and WHEREAS, the Planning- Commission finds it desirable to-modify the regulations governing,this sub-committee. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission, does 'hereby adoptthe following administrative regulations for the Trails,Advicory Committee: ,SECTION II: PURPOSES A. The purpose of the Trails Advisory Committee P_'eAC) shall be to assist the Planning Commission in imp"lementiny0e'trails'system as envisioned by the_City's General Plan. Therefore, the Trails Advisory` Committer shall have the falloriing duties,' responsibilities, and functions: I,� To review and make recommendations to "the �r?anning` Commission with regard I to trail locatlbns and the application of trail 'design standard for development proposals (i.e. _tentative maps, specific plans. parks) within the C,ty,and Sphere-of-Influence, including, but not limited to,. the Equestrian Overlay District, 2. To review and make recommendations to the Commission; regarding trail design standards. 3. To ,assess the present and future need for trails and recommend to the Planning ,Commission plans and priorities for the development of trails and related facilities.J1 SECTION 2: COMPOSITIOH .AND 'APPOINTMENT The Trails Advisory Committee.;shall,.,consist of six (6) members. Two shall be members of the .Planning Commission Is' sei`ected ;by the Pinning Commission. Two shall be'members of the Park and Recreation' Commission as selected by the Park`And Recreation Commission. one, r PLANNING COMMaSSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-43A TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE REGULATIONS April 25, 1990 Page 2 shall ,be a Member-at-Large, who shall be .a representative.`>of tRe. equestrian corsn�unity, appointed 'by the Planning Commission. One shah be a Member-at-Large, who ,shall be a representative of the bicycling communityA also appointed by the Planning CoemUsion`. SECTION 3: TERMS OF'APPOINTME�TL All terms shall be twenty-four (24) months and `shall be staggered - twelve months apart to 'mintain continuity. Any, member, of the Committee may be removed. at'a;y time by the appointing body- SECTION 4: APPOINTMENT OF'CHAIRMAN The City Planner or `his designated representative shall serve as the non-voting Chairman of the Trails Advisory Committee. SECTION 5: STAFF Representation P n at Trails Advisory Committee meet#rgs shall include, but not be limited,to, representatives P of th e Planning h Division,, & Safety Division Engineering Division, Building s on ,�,.and .Community Services Department. The Planning Division shall have primary reapon:ihility for agenda preparation i4nj general administration for= the Trails Advisory Committee. SECTION 6:- MEETINGS AND RULES A. Meetings The Trails Advisory`Committee shall meet once.a month or on special occasion as-.needed. The TAC`shall establish the, time and place of such 'meeting. The Chairman shall distribute an agenda for JAC meetings. At least three days notice is required .for meetings. B. Quorum - A quorum shall be 'four (4) members_present. C. Votino 1, Every official. action taken by the Committee shall be. adopted by ja majority of the Co*Aittee or quor n present. 2 In the event of a tie vote on any matter, the action shahi be forwarded to the Planning *Comission with no recommendation. 3. In the event any fiber votes in;the Minority'on any,item, it shall be,,the, that such'member state the, reason for tPie wiaority iso that said reason tag be reearded;in the minutes. L -. PLANNING, COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 88-43A TOILS A0VI50RY COMMITTEE REGULATIONS April 25, 1990 Page 3 SECTION 7: PROCEDURES A. The applicant shall submit the appropriate application and plans, to the COM01nity De-41-opment Department.,, , Once accepted as complete, the Planning Di,visjon shall ;,chedule the application for the first available Tiail't Advisory Committee meeting. The Chairman-shall distribute any plans at least a week prior to the, meeting, B. The Trails Advisory Committee shall muet to review and discuss the proposed project. The Chaiiman shall forward the recommendation +of' the 'Committee to. tha. P1ann',ng Commission or' Park and Recreation Co nission. Such recommendation may be consolidated as conditions for final approval. The Chairman of �e Committee shall give written notice to the applicant of such recommendations. C. If, after review by the TAC, the ,Committee feels that the project needs substantial revision,' 1'0e proj2rt <review by' the TAC may be continued by the TAC to enable the,,appljcant to make I revisions. The applicant'shall rer'3ive W11tten nctice of such ' decision. l APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH. DAY OF APRIL, 2990, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOn BY: Larry T, McNiel, Chairman ATTEST:_ Brad Buller, Secretary j I,, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning 0mnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,, passed,_ and adopted by the`Planning Commission: of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commi_Clion held' on the 25th day of April, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: AOL ;C>