No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990/05/23 - Agenda Packet '" r o i } M4 { CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GucA�rp 1V�.�Al4'10R1'�1�1�QJ c� r DATE: May 23, 19. , ° �z T0: Chairman and Members,-of the Planningr"ommission ' i97; .._,...- FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Halt Stickney, Associate Civil'cngineer SUBJECT: Fiscal Year, 1990191. Capital Improvement Budget Attached for your information are copies of-..the Fiscal Year. 1990/91 ' t ' Capital Improvement Projec-is Executive 'Summary; the Fiscal Year`1990/91, . : Capital Improvement Projects by Type and Fund list and the...Fund',Balance and Funds Available calculations. The Executive Summary lists all of the projects for Fiscal Year 1990/91 along with their--,current status. Also,,included is'. a: fisting of all projects (arranged by 'Project Type) and:which'elements of a project are to beundertaken during 'Fiscal Year. 199091. In additi6gj; ,projects for Fiscal Year 1990/91 are ;organized into< seven categories or•*+pes; they are: Assessment District` Programs; Beautification, Drainnge, Master Plans Railroads, Streets, and 'Traffic, The Project by TyPe list orgarcizes the various projects a,,o o the seven categories noted 'above. The Project by Type,;li st 'inelud,,,s ttiF dollar amounts budgeted for each,. project and from which fund Vw money is budgeted. Together, the Executive Summary, and the Project by Type .'list should provided an overview of the scope of the Capital Improvement Projects Program proposed for Fiscal Yew- 1990/9i, Should you have any questions rega,ding any capital project or the Capital,-Improvement Program in genLsral, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully submitted, RHM:WS:dlw Attachment w - c'aS'`\`L 3 c 3. \a\.i\ Z ,• 'a, a•e".���a �i` :,:�.'sfi L '' 'f'.. i`.o.' }yv. .; 5 'g-3`s?���^�� � •:.� €�.�'� � �L'� � \a' z3ay' �•;: \ e �, 'i)��'��•cW `^3�kz�j Ra\. qvy" �t=\ a,,s��� �i ay. y� a�� ', �"..'1 \ •fi3oi�: 2L ���,\.�`f�?k.Q3��'�v`a` \'�\\� `���i, �� ,p�/�Ci \:��? �e 2eY ,,,c v�,<' .��h�, zyyyi�•.,"v� RY•o,''`,i,'',.F:T, v����r,`i��'".\.v� �@ �`�''a��.�Z'"�`Y4��E�a�� � �+`4�" z'� 'xs� \z\� `�i.>\ r)`z Y� � `\•aaz '03 ♦.Q)q:,•�"�3v�v.. `zL,»c s yea:• Z,<' i Q. � aft •La3'73\�a }�?'Q;bn.'�Nf�J §\.����'�'�`�\ 'b` >. ���\��.EyF a��..$f i?C`n' � K�s�" •' Will .. Q \ '\\\\•�,� *f\£a �1 ,•. >\'�iZ f<.� `�'��.c '\i��` Ka `)a'r, z � u: E ♦ �\ ♦a't"Kc \':�Q.:. � it v.`<F \ a �h vy ;?"F c z�'^�•\\�\'�'aw\� ♦ P �° k '��\\°�.�2`��� i?ta a,. �\ )'� ,v'�<'4��` r�a�a•t�<��a�.�y�`a �k+�' aa�•,;� � �'. �.� �,��\�•t':"\\'\\,f, � '�� Via'; \ �\�C a\\\r*\f�i:`v f ���\��'>��'CL� \ )v:� � \ .��A>,•a\�,,.. Y°� .\E\�'f"s'\\!',voK '��. '�Z y\, ar \\\'•iv �` b\d �"4•v� ����a `i� 'ca`�L, '�vG �+ 'a\'v \'R i ��Y �Y \L������\<a�� F �v ;`, `�\t�`\3�•1\ �li�.v��'cq\ \z�y��sC`\-��L �4a \^ v�L��, �,Q� ,z k '� L �\ .£'ii5 ♦; \ \`�z\k'v\a ",.�\� �" J a '\k''�\`L �z\Y:�l' :ai �1rvs.va .x'• a�2��Y\)� ti�.k \ '\•. \v�' Lf^o �. `tea.�" Z�`� ���`\i`\.�Y`?x� \� � F�v\\` \a �<\vS� �i�.:.a\L '.\i •\a.\\iw�a\�,�.� `b 'kLv fi�`\`�, �.�Z.\ \ �`. w`�\\a£3` \ a Y`< '`v:.\'''4a a�`*a ' i\\'`yi\V\ ??s\e\`�\z\\a, ),t\ii\�v��� La"'a�o,�, �Y�',.����'��,v�.,�v' '.'.v��� xvv \n ; �\a,,k\s.�'\�e�i�x�•a..Z: �-,` a ''v1ti��♦i�,�•���`\ ^�1 a �?,v„�� fv����t�,�,\)a..���`'\ ��\•.\ ����„�j� '>`\i�.`F($ ��; Z't'\'Ca �,.. ')'� vZvza �L.L{\�,. \c•x� iY�\"`a•\", Y .;e '\`�"r� �\� ,"'��X.:a�`\.\a�a'v \ Z,:�\xa '>•.,�` Y" � r?�`♦ �'ii>.\ sire a a \ \v \Y u, ��, r T� \ \ ��Q '�• � ,.v, ,v' .q z \' ai\i aL.' K��`���'\e;' <��\�`.��♦x"��':.'•'x3. L '2\ r\\`� \ `\\v k a"w a a� \.k J.ai ' as \„3x•'..a?\ n� X xl e\, v�`�v` ml :o.at xCh:\\ Q s£'•c ¢""' i �,:\`.L`'•' ea. .c "�a A. 'x ;a \i l'".v'vL .'c ,ivn �\s ,a:�\ f��,'\��.v zap ix� az i.�•.�)�t \\` f `�,\ ��`"��\"\\��,:• �'��� �'�,v i 'v'M a.?.v. �.£czS.<; i .•zix `'>�:��i� �.��� .i0.`'i a'\� kiv t *may�y\\ "�".`L,7`'�C,�"`i:����.�.'v,�`.\ '� �^�4\k 'fin )'�\♦ )?i ,t ;b�ed,.,>�`" �����`,`�:<�aaaz M,.��:���v<�3Lx"�j y\` \ ��` i,^n\ x\\\�i•����'`���\�„�� � 'Q\\`e���'..+'a\?��vC�`Yzs�" iv��•4;,�\``\,ay`°' x\nv�'3,\\����`\3\`� ��w�3Z\\\\F\gC��. r \\-.i \\i�, e�k, �)\�l�a�z'`�v�,Q � '`'�'<`��G �\. `�.cf�� a'3�•�y�����a\ f ��' . ..,�•�\�?,) ��if C��� �\ �iz,\ f>� �b� 'i i��a� �l�rQ.�. �,\j\. s�\<3 �,i3 \� k ��`'�a a"��`S•••;��L>,,,\\ •�. 'a aY � ���ai�;)�S �kL�' ��'`�@ 'Q*'�Za i� �a\ '\ \\l � L\\�Q*'�S'. L� \`\Lx�\i 's, �a3"'`e'\Q,•.vaaZ�, a \ \g�L���'sawa\•z)"i i.,2 ib.,3;a \� a �\ ........... `.\ > \ }Af b"a.\ 'i ^a €�'a �,<v'•i* '+.a . Qv.`•.,i�„'i�'s¢n L :, `Q`�es�`i.P'• �� ,\``�a.`s•p,' a..,a \ �.)i ,�'2 k^i "� v'C)\"cs� '�'�'i \ a 32`\,. \�♦` 'c�'L.. C`)xx.� �f'�`a � \a r CC3\Xv`c� .\a Qy�v�\�.�...�<�;t`�;t"' f� 3aQ ��{' �i�i����� a �\ a`\��`����•��i�iv�e. L � i Z� �. `�* \` �\">•����� 6isilF r6i�V � 4.�19E„ '�t>a�a..a�� ,} \ �5.\\k.�� ``C ♦ �`n a 'vaw � aS `Lid\ �^.� �s'�•.��^3\ Did \ �'4,IC1 $li .,#. >.35��.a..Fi, '`�� ?ice ".�\,y'6��,\`',u\\�r`'��aqr \"„a., rY• a:.���M� ♦yak�Z• R �� �{� ��,��� �Z� ������3re,�&�� ^ ��+\ ,��� �\ak ea ��1' � � 9 as xa��' \3�"� a�o§ d�a. � s >•' ♦ C t ia i�i 'a;»?fiN :fv'3 '.,`yy, "3„., ,. �"'G`zA.ro.: 'v >zL';:` `�'31a •�c&,' '`aib �. afa \a\>:L � x a `k "u. ?��L?�ax.'k • `au 7 �.�,,..a� ,. ����'��� ,`£'�: a.�.a,, a�"\•`k` 9 # ,' kv '� by u'� N a �'�"�`''`:�s`\" `�•a�,,2:a3n35."','��,�4����°„�`���`"�\" "�`�..a<� tt' � �f'�. �w '�Fy' �q.: ._ aGkv�'g` RCL�Y i.'zQ �' �.• \.,i^z�`; a Z\ ';< �x c,:� d, '.£Sps`�'•t�''isa� �.���_� 3i����'e�k "nz,: ,:♦.,.� ,e`v»x' � � ��' :'> x�,3 f $a �js?` `iz"♦x,�•�'�'a>i3�� �a •�";, �v<., ,\: ''��, § �" .s r\`. " zy\M`�\\�� "'\' \�Zi'e ?b. � �� �' ~ a�.$`,R♦Q f��.' r .:. �.C`.`Y G: � io <x3AR•` ``\$>�f���s\:'i' „i\•�:'.� "�i�•'�.�Y�'Zas ,`.S„� :�. f„) :ik•(\ x �v»` ,,.:�"�y ���"♦'����>``,. ��vz���t�` �^a � �kx'�w3..� tu`\ �, ,Z"A �`�zf�z �•' �„��y�a L s � �ts���g� f�a`fa,�'`�,���?'',.,,�,��5 `�\ .�d��`'�'�� ♦C�.��»ix.'S'``J';aR ,�� �� t` `�'� \:;yx,Q » 1 io! a\m CG\u'zay'\"x \ ♦ .a< \A`sue I ��'3hiL♦,a`.ax'�.t��♦Aa`ava:`•��f."j�.i�a.i'c'�,.\�Y�f\\:1y�']�Q�,,��at!' tec�a..a„�\ , �,ick�,„�,t.Ca am a f OW , ��f ��t ��a'.�\kx������Q�j���,`;�` �� cA♦ 'aa"\i Di.� ,h1aR�� ` ��y\T' s, �\ �� \�� '�� 5�A'a\�`c\z�• �iIM�'@?.di �� � gzzx a. .,\ �� � ay}$k C�, �k`�\\♦`£"Z `>S` t,��Q `�;rav,.V F�,�`;c �� �♦�.x��,',�v` ��� 3. R`.,'` .'F.��`�' a ,`�t`>f,,va 'Sx 1. �\'. i b.y\i ♦ �R.k\Z` � ` \� Y a ,.•�yi >�♦,^�`\R Ra'3�'�. x`` a: v`\�:x•`�;iu��, "�`0'n� `i �� ;=l v,�.� �., "Will `. � ♦ h 3 n`ilk �} �'\z\ ���x`�\�`��➢ k "�� `�'' �� \v \��3. ��.\ �a,�,�;x��yW;�e\ yaws,, c,1`�`�,,, .���,� �. a. A.\ •. ,.�` ''� a S ♦.� Scat„ ♦cel�;�z\'?S �>.' C'F'`' •�, a <, '� L`, ``i i. `\�C�\`1��x*` `�`\a�* \♦L`��`a`Yze i �r�a\\�v•♦� ���*,. \.�� `;� .�\..� �`�`�� �v�\ �Z.v `�.�. c) 15�`�z`ra�'eaaa�z *1a.�.xr< i`� \\��• ��\;, \`` a�t,�� �` �`, � ., may.. � � i��\ . \.\f, \ti ♦k �.� �vc ��'t� ��.`zG�x�.\`�,�,» v `Y`Z , \``♦ � �� C s:t ��'C` Za`�`z�\`'",sz,`\'>o $ �z"`�. Lv \`, w , ����,,', \ "s`2 �•` �```,;�*.`� `��� �f\x a\�•x� .\�``\^1'�2 Via` m:?. g ���<a2��votet��` �\; .\'•3e`�t yw`♦m♦`3S,? '`�` �.\i \`a` 7,�, �0 x.`3,\"p+. f♦ ` \a♦G>^a`C zy'cy\iai�\z .vz \C �c.. 3•>�"f,avc\ £... \`4c�`. \ "` $� K. \ a` , �R kf �'C as�a\�.�a \"\ ���•`' `\`,.'a�'a \^O`S•'`` � �"\�"�' �v 'v 5�.,��`"`� R \ ` �",\ ��i �3�,y\h'��tva�� �via��a*� f��`��,'`{'� .`,V.`�`'1�' a�` �z♦.• .��,"�`•a�,•Y`L.`\\�t` \`°a '"^���; .°c�` �y; \k `.II xt'` L� \ >,'♦,,a mow.\,`` ��\ @ �i ` ��j•�y.�\����`♦�Q�2X., i 4�. �;` •�, y,4 z��`�•�v �\. t+ ice..."aa�'�. 3�'\Ztia\���`L�' �\ `��` �y cR,i `�`6..♦ `�� M���� � a\� ' � \a;�;AK'�• \��,f:Wa\,\�„G„x � \>\\\a� a O n� �`a `\`��'\ R�.� �\ �• a ,3 �� k�A:'i'R�.ry\ta.Ck �iK'��� �z\a .♦Dd\.vl� r L��p\ 1 "�a`i\`�,\�C\.� �,"'. �� `\`c�:�s� �> \'yR a\ x ♦'cw.�\��+�� ��\`y� \�`��'^'a:z;� a'���" � ma`s,' z� ,�,\q. � \T�',`� RF as A � 4�. \ \a` `s .``T� �ax,. x: �a \ „`\1ay`\ ^s' `,�`'z �`. `a♦ .,a ♦.<'. \\\a ♦, >4 a'\\ �>\\\ z ¢Z \, .\\. Y�\.� y �..�. 0>r, �\ `�.i @ .ai�•\�`. � � ♦ii� `E \ 2•i. ay.+. � x ♦ .1 as�3r,>\� '\♦\7Ya'`'v\`L,♦„s��i\' .YZi\ `" Y4"`CA=��4♦,. `"� `' \�t'." ���a� Oil � \\, \»» r z. fG\ ' a��\ Y .- w a ZT\�♦ ,a.,3;. �.: r '\ �\ \\ 0♦•1zi¢�\� Y`�� k`b� \,S Z\\\ti ...ar +� `zy.�\.zN, �"\$`�a '� 5: � .a .st.c@ �a�'�i 3,���a.\�Y.`�k.a�„.:�':R'�'C �i\` y a ,�a'`L• \ ,�\\\�a'�A \�`z��` \`•a �a�� � �.. i k bti f L '�\ �'\i�bY�, �s\ t.\�Z�\ �x a ,:. ,a♦ Z R'as \w,``,^vi` �sx. : ,` > vh`' �`.�` �`\♦♦, '♦ \aC 3,\ �,<,'"♦.hz. i caa``tx •��R \;e°. ,. `3�>>a\ �'yaa,,�"v>..,`�\�`\��,e`\�E\R. `tca T� f\\� a a2a♦Z,�rS��`♦> •`fi i..Ziy ����RSfr�i R"\R�a•��a„` C.a �`z k\`q�t`'`�\�`*�\. ��a x; \♦a`C`1� �n"\�`t�'`s'v����\`>.\`\ a :z.��R f c,« $��`�F 'kx'�`a�`�♦.\ `` '�� `a\' ;. �<�` .;ja�'k\��"V\x'�'�,�,�.�A�z♦2 �, `\3\•v\ ��♦j�: �\�`�r'���t� `\� ��g�:S>•, a^:`� .\����•�`�\;L���a"A, 4 Y c�ai:\`'ti�`t\�\\' ��,i��`�\y"`�l\�'�\' A�s���'a2.`s f• L� `�;� So\`�.,,5, "\�`eC�> '�" '\. 3 \`k>a \Cr# ♦ >at"'a�a *�? f' ♦Z �� f'���\fu3 iE < �"�" D �\ � na. ♦ate v,�\�„\., \♦ ..s `*3a \`..'•v.`'� c �f�•kL.i `t kZ„ •�L\\.t ya> \�a'�ZN i�.Z`-^`a `\\,f,�\�`'�`�\ k \y ��� a n ela>.yy3 � ceC a, •. ',``, Zaf♦a.\�a''�`'♦ \�.x� '`» f '� .�.{��,a�a# CIHT OX.CH�V,Ci LICFiTn�liK7id9, F q �'�`\ 4J® �Ct KJLIJLI� \\L t.,\ \.aM» �, h > .: ,eta` xax♦♦Y R.MaraL A"� �c-� ,.' >ta � xx,'C\,♦ `y"L\ 5, i M.",�`z 7>tE.^aa� ��2a= `\sa`�v'>aa• 4s•t� ,,. `:' .,.. .:' }„ ....�.Fy\ .,..�.Rf a.r \•�,v... \Y.:.i 3\'�,Yi \\ \�R U�W.� � 4` N �,\ ffil Mi I MAN i3�ak'KMt cis s,�t�,,r•i`s � £.�,ik e{5,�,, a r e t,�{ Ia¢C�,�::r ♦ 4Z¢:` o. eft. C'\`r. ��` �ie�♦ S '� as`�.'zC,t�a<L;� iLx 2E�`��' `��?� •;`z�,,3s\",�>X��:�. 'v`.�� •Q� �,� . v �� �.�♦<�`�g41��0`: t`.}a.o'� '�' ,���n ��..o♦.,,w"�t ��+g sx}�'y`'3`v�`,�k �' l j�`. <`T�.'�`+ � ?Q'�\"�`€. ��U,♦�`��.y,\M�i3"\o,".,�� `S,�v�`;�}`fi<iC�� =V Wr�r�'a'AR Xz..,wk\� �`Ey"'v t��k,`'`V\a` a�� �*\'>•\.\\, `,�}� C�a`�t.,o�♦��y���> �Cx\z�tr>��`� i��„ �����'��` �,�a��ti,�,*� ,{ ' \ i' '�♦4, :S+ ;,: �3 v�`�♦` �`a�vy; y�� ^,..$�y��`* `''���,..�A C x� ` �a F�� �`3'?3a�v. av` \ r"''�..`;w'?.,a`a\c'�L\'y}u` ^ ' `•'.` .t"\ ,,♦S �` ,,. `:v ♦S.l q'` ., U \Ui� \ 'W"i � \ � ix,� y�zk���\\}`}`' ii ... ♦ � � \ , Ux \;.��. Z`^�.�. �`>a t "��r�.r'\,fix � zx\`ki:R���;ta��' ♦ u� �.�� �`�S`�\��a "`,��j ��i o,�J. � , ���>C.,x\�' iS`4%ii♦.> .w\,�.`A�``�'�'�'�''<�,�,�`zT� z..� �`,z 2s�'''`3,� ���A\\.\♦ `ti�♦\aye a:�♦\C. •\�, ..\ \ ♦•a.�.' ;\R z: >.,.c�`�v��3��'R��,,r �'F\^x♦�o,.'\v\Ca\�C r �- r \ ,.�� w��fiv�� .,��E�`` ♦♦ ��S *$7x;�_�a rrs �O"�\~i.s:�"3,`\71; �'3�'�a`�`��i v •\i �` \� �* � �` 1.ti tie t s,`X .�\+ \�^'� ` �� £th 3fos,�'t„°k.�'� `uv ���,�'♦ i�aoa C�:x'S��C�� z•2�. `"`Z^x Sa\�,r♦a�. \moo roa ^SC'>)k�\,�♦rC e/,tR � �.. `\ .�o`�. �,`�� .��"� ��♦�s ri�i��\`\3 '���o� `��>�vJ \aa\ � �z aC \� >,a��"�+\C� � �. `��. \'Z Mav .♦�v,�s � ��"�� R����`�� `"�"\aR��.3= 3r `^' ��`x-�.; �,�v�� � � .♦� z 'Sl;y\�� 'ice es: 1t C'♦.ae�\a'�a� c���'"`��'L �.Z <��`b%\�4 a a'�'��.�`.`�Ci �\��"£"�is�� �\\ '��`0� .�\.,`.,x�i��,.��F`3.a'�'�>° Q \�'P <.`„ \> \""'+v� >t"s-C\!'s♦♦ �\ erce'n'�t� �\`�♦:'>:�'.♦"`� :,t� a \\ MEN � �."�z�."a�"t. ,�c��<�C`'\\��.'� ♦��a\. .v.t\�r�r�`�:�Cr`a\"`\�R �\.�.e'� � �s`v. ., � a���. Et'.�� \\ :r;>='< a gs\ \\x. ♦\� 4M \ e� \ a C v`z.�Kt\`C,�\ ZW SST ..y ZS=\`s;fit';Y,Cz.,z >a \\ 's< .tC'3r`�Eak" } C� "`• \ `.. �'izta\'a. � \ \\ v \� ♦�:i ♦� ,�<\' \+iz,y3 n�`Axz<`t "`c�sCs�cn`c`� �z♦fx \g� x�. \: �� i R\a\.ti�` \} z E�♦ ��k ta``��.fv>e x<o t�+°�k'� ,>\'\\ c �`� �"!>}a�_ �y,. ♦ 'z \8,.a� ♦,F,z, C $ > `\ r t><, zc ♦x �♦ � ro,.�\^ � \ a«,i\ ♦♦,,a�?3x: a�\.a� a��v.:xk s"C� =J e ,*ir >\ �.fi Ao�,��♦p\i�',�iy�a:Tz ��"aF,v�� �'o`^ ��v���� ��Y`���^`>a+`�"`\zb y,z a � '��� 't Y S� •.,'� n i�y '� vet,,, ���,'C+���`Y�������`���... '� ar>'`\k\���v L '\��_ `��;,,�i. ���t�v-:+. '`n ���z ��.n �r��\�c r'yz�3x\.z z3 �� �.��"♦\3 ' '��,.\`\♦r`<� �c �4x �"�•_>, `1';�1y`"�\£'q\ � }` \ � '^<t i22'�✓.{�`�'� ]T�V i>�A�U.}T `v��ii�x>^`.�a,., \\� �♦ \ \ \.h�a,< �.,�sh\ \\ \6vy`��e^ ♦ c>>� � �is kt,>�t x<x�r�>�,.a��;su�s�MFx\wy��,y'I;��Z� � 2 `�zt.�` ;��k,f\"��t'z'2�'�`�`; '<., i.a § ��.\.\\"♦ w'C : \ tta � ?S t � Y�`.<>``e o\ ��.ca�.` 'CO'''Cx'� 4•.q`m�u.1! lz a\� c x> r xz ♦€` `$ ,�J� r` =i�'�*�` s�"�iw��a> \i =two r 3 'i ���,� \Z `-\ ♦� i, s a`" t `'" �>t�`\�`bC �as�'�z�k,,�J.F��ay z g.:a.£,'�`C.'� `a ��.z�""1,.q',,.�5: k ..>. ,..:3 {v.♦.,<. r ....` ::�,?. .�i.,t.s<`�F..�C♦\N >r�J��,♦� `,'�\'v\���cvr��."a. z�F'j vt�`tCi,�a x"�y;�tu��. rF '' Fiscal Y'earc � - ASSESSMENT IDI.STRICT PROGRAMS , i} AD 88-02 Industsia:AssessmentDistnct Drainage System a}''- Sixth-&46hth Stwt Stmm Drain and Railroad icrossin�' �'ti besween Center Avenue anndliaven Avenue, Campiete R/R I�r¢+eessing' Ca istraxetion'' b Jersey.Boulevard;,Stcri—M Drain:froinVik6t Al+eras eastsa+acd. Covzstruction 1 , v ; t� a r � r\�� #x �ti•�+a, a „h \ ,• :,�e x �..� �\'_. ��,��,,`�� ` x 1zS���xY� 3`�x'3C. �•\\ �\`a xsSxi. ��ahr..>'zv: `r,' \< ,�:�. � • ,,.��h \. 4Yt�'�\�.��aC"'�i.z i'aaej\�ca •Q,">�2 1`:� '\X\ 4+.. \�. 3 3, � � t ' Y' `§�•\fix \ �\c\.. \ i,�\C \ � \ �. \ ��,�� \ \\,. � h a\C ���\� 'R d n�\ z~,z a•� �\,. ♦ `a�`. �'. aaa� c `F3i�`�c�J`�� ��,�`\a.�'t�ffi°' \ i #3 iiYc � $\ .?.. # \ "`�' R` $eua 'i• z�c� � �a\�`.\\ V��R4`�`��Y`": :, "xis• as \�� � � ♦` a � �'x` � u'3��a.\�\:'a��J``'`♦���\�'"�\�`•\�� yya o'k�=\ �C``.`�\ \ ;m Y ��i `h ;` C ♦ n �Kcy,•�`�'�eiy.�ca\3�z����,\m,�\•` ``�;< ,\�, u �e �`` 'itvi '\�y' \` yE� x "♦''•3\ y��w\Z♦\ `C 2�� `h�2,",ra.�`,KC\ n \ � `a \'h`\,'z. \1i �i� 't`\ 3�i����,� ,"�`\`\,\ i��.��x3.Y..v<eK. ♦ _: �.:�. "lam:,h:�,\ ♦ \.4;\,A�3y\. y�,�,i 4 tX<,��a��e �\���` ��c�\*�� ��i`,,\'.,��,�� �,ate ` ��x "�t`�.�`��"•�;♦aC\`'`:a\a � \\`l� �:i 3Rx5 •�i�.k�♦$ 2 •„��\'�,3 r r zT .a �'� � x d �i"``,�, v \• \• \�, �`<�,y ..h�3\�1�x\�` ♦x• fi.��'d`�c\���,�'. `..�.°a.3•,h \ ��`�,,`i,=b S.e �: x, ',.�' \a\ a�\\Y`Sr�• ♦ `\ c ``.` \,�K\�\) s�,\k, <k. :i',3 a `�i � � \ 41 a,� '\ \ e�i"tCt ♦` �4�+\` a`�' ,♦ ``a K c a�\♦`.�'i+�"�ti,^l`�� �\ \ >a; \�\`.\,��a��•.1c�`yam.t.�'\ "F�,�,��z, �:♦���\��.,\ a,W. a� °.\ t�fj� \ � .i. 2�\Zaa1•\\\�c\•`:�` ':�`\l a\CM��,a�;\��i�•'crr,v \�` v,, ya\ s \ F-. t k� ������: �.•k•'��'\\t`�\''����y�1e���yV,eay�` ������.�`�\.��'`\\a "\ �. c A 1��a�F���;�\�,♦a�\c '�•\��a ��+T'�S\�`k``\�a�� ^C F`�S•t'o ♦�y+\it \ �.\a I'a \'c\e.;i; x�r S � �,m=.e\\\ z♦�'m v�`\a'h�ix,\:�q���\\�"�`♦�`b=�'�..i =� \\ �` •,`,`+�;��•.c ��� `�^\i `� sC y� i\`\•P \ ax\ av gi ,� m Y � :Z \\\\,a'>: � 4 .,\z ii• ♦ 1 y3,x, a 33CC:y�\ \\,x .,: 3.\y�\.�,?�e2`�y K�` y �' gib\: e ♦ t `�c�'3� �.�- '^'F�caT\`\ \� 3 ''�,\. �` �`E �'cn.\'�., \ 'ZC ��\�`�` ``•\\2. `��p r\.,�"'a�\a z ? •' \\,\i h�^\'xR i`\`` \ ,•k::r\�\ \�\ .k` xlic````''xa \` ,x, y :� \ \.�3�tz\� z. �� a\ �\♦ � "b zia♦+\'4� �" �\,:w: `.� Z\�� � \ \A♦i J<x \'� ♦ \ \ @ 3 \a\"Z\"\S "Y,� x•\ � Z`iw\'fir 00y �. 5' '\�:\\��a� '°'�\ `\�.a M,24 x� Al keesr �� r �� y` ,S,Uw`,�•`•�a4\ \ xia - �'.z.=,Fw\.�^'^�kx,`�i\\ }.,�\� �i'♦c 't h h. , 5'� ki `'�.L� � at.,:.. i�x...o. .t..u:.:.�,^\iKDs i,.'C�'•`,�i*a>�„Y'�:;,`�' f Fiscal'Year 199p/ 1 BRAIJTWICA.T1ON'PROJIECTS I.A. QI�ON-i'�]iNC3 Pi20i� ' 1) .Haven Avenue 2viedian Improvements` Phase ffi-"SOuth ofLeniort to north of Wilson Cortaplete Construction Administration 2) I3av4n Avenue Gateeway Entry Monument at 4th Sliest; , East side' Complete.CattstrUction,A lmitiistraiiors 3?� Archibald Parkwaylleeautification Study ' Southern City limit tonorthern City limit Complete Study 4) tVl lliken Avenue Parkway a id Median Beautification Study Southern City limit to ndthern City limit .Complete,Study: 5) 1 +t!iken Avenue.Gateway Entryy Monument at4th.Street Eaststde, Complete ConstruciGon. 6) Baseline Road Parkway Beautification Improvements West City limits to Wiest of Carnelian St." Complete,Cotistructioir Administration 7) traraelian Street East Side.Parkway Beautification Improvements Vinevaid Avenue to.Baselind Road Cotemolete Construction Administration 8) 6th Smet Median Beautification Study Haven Avenue to 01a Rochester Complete Study ; 9). Rochester Avenue East Side Parkway Beautific iton Improvement East side Foothill.hculevad to Baseline Road Complete Construction 10) Monte Vista Median Improvements East of Eastwood Complete;Design and Construction 11) Baseline Road Parkway and Median,Beautification Study Haven Avenue to eastern City limits Complete Study 12) Milliken Avenue median Improvements } 4ith Street to'6th Street Complete Construction4. 1 a: s' 13) Terra Vista Far go and Baselina Road IVtedian Rettofit`und bland iviodifications Bas'16 Iload66m lhven Avenue to Deer( kL,'iannei . ` Cota2tsuctemn: j g). Baseline Read Ia.rvcape lvYaintenanee Dist&c#1 Piasjects`' Baer,'"southsider(Ratdona to CambMio. Base sbuthsi&(east and west of Cc'ntar)' Baselfne sduthside.(5QD'east of.Ceneas ta`siaven) �amplete Design,attd C tgstrtiction ls) Sapphires etTxaiIImptovcmnt Jennef zd,,Mlsi ;C.M. not recommeiidet- J; 16) clommuruty Event Banner Mes Archibald north of,1"oo iill and Base3ine west of I�aveci s� Co pleto: constiiitlon .s I. B: PR(QTFCr'I� No projects sobinitted ` i 4 �Fe rt 5 F i .�y£ a,<V�'£#,x4Y?"b`l�a�"�z� .s y:zaj x u `3Ya �����,c.� .,��,�, :t a�x *�iy,, s�•' �' �gxhtia SL����i?i �S � °� >a��' \ �,a'°�p�,N<�: ��a"�y�`x� C,"a;• .�` � i ,�ic<� laic:: ���k;t�^R�� ��< .'.;,�.;�' x•��, $. �`��' '�" a, '2�. �;ri�� � ' `a\r '3'�•C�:�>t+.a..s. �.`•kb' k`Eci` �. '+�`}S i• $ � ;� a ;� k S�`�'c�k�1`',�\��.j'�x��x��V�\�S^�'• � +`�� ys�� � �'c' �„S �a�.�`��\fix'x�'a� x'" ;� '��•' �^ '�^ f"° � "5 .:S• `"z' '.�. va i .' �`, \ a`•�.,�C'>'" `2 �i�� �r \ ♦♦ \ S R" z�\,\ ',�``�3: '`�r"a> .,`•�n y�` r, \,���. '� �� ��`\ \i\ \,may � $F�� ���`\�•���\�`h3.�`��`��`,,,, S�e�'�`�� �'a�`'����?>�\'Gi\�k''x � .�. \\`.��`¢ `aa.�\N��a�����R�.���� �\a`: II •l`i S.� "`�,��\"4\``�,\�\� ��� ��a �.\ 3\ � �•,`.q+��.�..*.�r^ i.a�'�Y `5 i`i'� .\ ; � t\����� aka a`xa�� > `\.� \a vw.�\\ ��a";��q.Z`a .�.,;si.U�•�..3`'�'`�c � a a`a.x\ �.`tea \`�,� -`\ Z\;a.: �.`>a� a�a����4`.aia'\ '�\\\ a`bk ax :\ �?5� ��ea�>���@��`\� .,:.�\•,£`.,\���.���a`� �� a �'i�"`�\ `� ^, 4♦ \\'fir,, \�'r`''i$ �y\\ '\ S>�x ?'�k\k Y'��\•�\� � ^C L�� '¢, �\. \ \\� �' ey,c £\ia r��\\�\�``\r�a r•\\ �\ax a`\S x�4��\``� 'k<l?'�1'\�'i`7`•\`4a��`\�, ���ka ♦. ��\''.a. :l. Z> "* i. ��t��4 ����k\�k��w:k� ,�����x�,xz>tih\�\�x�,s��a���F\�,<���:£��fii``\i����,`�\\��\:\`y \x`�•,�^?'� ��i'��� aE'2 '���\ �a \.. \'" S\h\:a •c'�. .�^\ d \z` `'�.S,aj 7 w�a>�\".1�T'Ya.\\°+�'�•�a\���� "@"�s��� ?\���h��u�.�n.���\ ?\� \� cZ •\\'�,i .ux>���cti„\.�kc''i�a\�cK'YJ�? \::x\�,�\��"\�;a�`.q �� \, ,c���Z\ \��a:b e� .. .. ,,,.'!c. ..., ..<.: .\.. ,.,a.: �'^a"O'�`C a .\:�...:`:Via. „3 �`RA\s. `s,♦ 't ti Fiscal Year,1990/91 , DRAINAGR PROJECT-i L A. CCJ�'I'IlVL7ED GR ON-C'�tNG pR031�CT +,. `'! t 1) a'ln a VI Church-Hermosa Storm brain Phass 1-From Church Basin slang Church Street to Hermosa Av rnae Cowpiete Design, SBCFD Processing aqd Construction 2) Area II Cucamonga S.P:R.fi.Storm Drain. Phase I(b) east of'Camelian to 13W east of Cucamonga Creek Channel CompitQ,'Design, SPRR and SBCFD.Frocessing and begin Construction 3) Area Cucamonga S 1'.R.R.Stoim Drain Phase 2='1400'east of Cucamonga.Creek Channel to I;..eliman A ,rue Complete,Design anil SPRR and`SBCFD " Processing r. 4) Area=Baseline StormDrain, East zf Day Creek Channel to future Day Creek Boulevard Complete1Des'gn' 5), Area II Amethyst Storm Drain East of and west of Amethy%non 19th Street Complete Construction ,Administration 6) 19th Street Storm Drun West of'Amethyst to east of Hellman' . Complete Qn1trans.Processing and Construction 7) Area VI Lemon Avenue StoiM Drain, Phase 1-I:ower Alta I.rj='Channel to Amethyst 'Complete Ltesign 8) Area II Amethyst Stoma Drain Phase 1-East bf Amethyst north,of 19th Street to Highland Avenue Complete 'Constructio n 9) Area II Camelian Avenue Storm Dra n Phase 1-Vix,rero to north of Baseli&u.Road Complete'Design 10) Area V Hillside Road Storm Drain Phase 2 Upper Alta Loma Channel to Archibald Avenue Complete Construction Administration 11) Arcs ffi Bear Gulch Storm Drain West of Baker south of S.P R.R.to north of Foothill Design and,Ac4uire Pjght•of-way i. 12) Area IV Archl6a1d 8torim Drain Phase 1-Tx r Creek Chaiiael to north of 4th Street Corarplete ;Design .� 13) Area IV A=hJbddSwrm])rain Phasts 2-4di Stmeteast of Archibald; Cognpletae Design 14) Area]V/Ar hibald Storm Drain . Phase 3 North'of 41h Sawt'to,North of 6th Sweet, Caimplete.Design IS) Are,"I VIFi ghiiut4'1 venue St s Dmin I.owroi Altal:oma Channel to:Archibald CbmPlOW Desigta,. 16) Ar+eaIXHA*en.;ltormDntin Phase I i Deer Creek to north of Church Street 1,.o mplete Design;Complete tSBiCF D Processing, ' rind Construction I, B. NEW PF7EC ,' I) Area II11"11camianga S.P.A.R.Stomp Drain Phase t(a)-Cucamonga Creek Channel to east of Carnelian St. Reimbursement to Developer.for,Constructleh` 11.A. �g�g�C ,OR(3N 1143 PR ACTS l) Areal Almond Interceptor Channel P,asst of,Turquoise to;northc rly extent north of Almond 2) Area ,IV Edwanda Storm'Dxaiit Phase 3-Wen of Bast Avenue toBdwanda Avenue along Route 30 ; 1 r t \ a,� �. ♦. .� x. ^:\��; is.\ `�- as � �.yy, \ iy ♦ �\ai\♦ �� t�\ �� t \ nx\, `�C \��`,3=,\G a>=ay>a�x e�.� \� � ;M;•\<"�y 5, a.��•y.���` `.a'`\\'S`�,?`>nk�a,'�'a��Z� is�� ;� "'� i`;\� wi �a\ J ��\��; < INS ;, ir".��.� . � n �`�,'♦:n':i�\ '�a\:`\ Aix �>�i�\`��5�>�� \��\,`•"`�, '•a'�a'�•'w�`a��`��`3:. �\',,,"+�'°r` �a`�`�,�t`` �<` ��$\��i...�\'z��,��`Z•�`aaAa'.`.\n\,s�''�" 'a\\ �. xm i •i '1\,: �; n� aa,3.,i,.� �>,w �xc.�:,\\ `•\\��`'St$��..�3,\'\�`� \ q \ r: ���3� •xx.��`�'� � \�\'�\�N,u\`� h ,.""."\.>Y\� yR �_ a�,�'�.,�x.��>��,i�yv�`\ '`a 'c\.`\\`\\ v�.\�'�i� \w'c\\•`Ci`a\'Nk ��d2 `�i >. \ \ .. .. `a^s��c`\'o' \, . \�� x?\C ♦ \c. va`i>n i\ � �">. \ '`> \x5:•;k>C\`§ �' \'�� `�;�y,:\ m \ ♦ `� i\>.. n*`�\�.�s.'t';,. �n.� �.��\\,; \�Ue•, \��\ay'C� x \ `3`\\a, C + ,'§`\\\: x a :- n>♦` �\` \ 'k`'`C^;:a,>'?v��` A•°�N ?�\ � \\ �\\\\.w�i�.\ \\ '`a� � �j'{>Qk:C`\�`i�•�.�.Q �\ �,a+a S�x♦i���sv c ^vim �`�:`z.\e`�T�`�. `s^`" �xal`M ��n�"\�\\`���� �� ��i♦q•'i'. `a`� ��� � \�vRa♦`3c3..a?i4i.-�3s'a`a`\.� •v�\a�`�1\��\�'Aes♦v.•\ �'.uxa�a \\\w�3..\a�,a 3i "�`x��crJ`.i `\\�♦�w��♦ � `.\�^. MMOM \\��\a\\`•`\��\��,\ \ten'"\\V \�`a, �'x , \�� �?�\�}� ��.��'� � a �•\\�\ C \ ♦ C� \` x�\vx� x "a�� .\n�Z\`\ZZ\�x\J\\i\\�'F���>>n\a.s+\.\ 0.`'Z'.. � � . ���N�`` �\� �� �. �..\\\'• ir.\�.\,�:' � \ \, `'\Z�\\�'u \ `•\�\ \v��A\ems Via\ \ � �\\�.a` >ti� `:;•��� �� �� : \ \•'.\ s,��'v\J �.��,, \ �\`\\z\\\,�`�L����;v�.I tC ..:;.,.,♦.3>.\ �t'.��\\\�� a`'\�,\��\�\\`\�e\fir��\���"`�\\ \ is \ \\ w\ \ �l ♦\�� \ry� �\\; \ \\ A \ \ � n ��\�"u\♦ Y\w ct` \�Z\ai,� �ti\\''�aa c`*:`����.. \;.`•��a�\��Q„`\\oc\������ \\\\�`ti�n� \, \ `>`.4\ ��\y\\\\_\ �\h\ems\L\� D��\��; �,\�\\�`•ae,� `\����C�\���\��\��\ \\i 2_\ \�\♦ \v�y:\\?k1�4s\aaV�$ ���� k� \�i�\\\y`k��m�'���\`����i,x�Z,��i\\\� �\•�u,ys��\i*-. \ ♦ �' \.�\\ s\\\\\� a<♦w x � 1 \� v�`�ic.a`� \\t\2� �� `\C \'Q♦z\\�<Z,. ``'` v A�.v u, ;_�A\a� VA♦ C•a, \°�`k�a�:a vv�\�\;♦�\i�\eV'i�� �,.c,>,i\�.,�;�\�. �,j' Fiscal. ,Year 1990/91, ' MAS.TP�l PLA6PY PROJrCS L A. EHOJ /Tl '1 2) MasterPlanofDminage Cu(m onga/DeerDayCreekAreas Complete Study, 2) City Wide Drainage Facilities Inventory Complete Computer Digitizing of Inventory 3) City Wide Tree,Inventory and Management Program" Complete'Management Program 4) City Wide Street lracilitfies Inventory andManagemenfProgram Complete,Inventory. and'Management Program 5) City Wide Traffic Control Device kvmory and.Management Program Complete Management Program I 6) Tmnspi,-.ation andTraffic Long Range Studies,Models and Management Programs and Fee.N6xus Study. CoWpWte Fee Study I. B, NF.W'PRQ=; No Projects Submitted \\ 5. ii . \a��?' M�tiu `'r�x \�'\��i��v\�a•.0�`��♦� 'e x c i \♦Y '� \�xw \ \ y� �\ c \\\a \� \\•�@*,v 4 ��\�\ \ \ v\�v�.,r \\•, t\♦ •e..♦\\s?+..'u Z �,;M• � zy \ hj's.� �..a` "z� �\\ � \ ''Y�-...\��• N ,\\\\�� \ �,j war �♦ \ a\>� �� \ c ♦�� \ ♦`4 �Y�ax y�.x� '• i ♦x •\°a xY 4<♦ • `, \ i�a�\�\, ti \`:a..�\ �� .. �! .- tt�♦�� U ��,xYs♦'+M.\'�\ ; :. '\ v Yi�-\ \�\*\t \ �♦�\\e x `!� x�ti�\4a��i*.�''x'� K i\��' \a \ >,\ Zia \♦♦'#\cJ 3.. v 'C�:a \<Z \ ♦ �v \7 \�� \\ \. \� '\ \1k��Zh ya \ .x e� - v ¢ \�:.,\\i Alt\\^, • aL ?♦ F'm'�:'e,`K xa♦� .a ♦ • \ .�. S x�\\ ♦��♦ \\ `� r�\\�t� ° x, - �\y.a a Sic\�\\ �+ ��,.♦ �>'� a�'1w Y• 1. \ 4� \>``�'\a ♦ \ � \\ ♦ � '� 5 a.. �\. ♦\•�`�"Q\ \ ?;6 \U ,a�\� \ � x �v.i` v�Y�L n�•v\��Cd\�\ � � \\\��.;\�i Faw\�x`Sr,\h�^v\i �a �. �\2 t'C'\ c ,\\\i\ ati>� Ak\\y\\\\ •ak�� Z\\\� \ vp :� � v�` �v V\i\ �Yv t x _v�'iai \VA� \� r xt\ �, §•�LguA ? l\ ����h�k \�' x� 3\�vyv �• � \ ♦: ♦K \♦A � v $ x`t\ vy,`� iy,�r♦XYav♦'� 4\�\V• a � ; \ \ v� vux \ • v X'. �>tiv♦•*'a k� \��\♦�♦4 \ 2\a�Y....... •♦\\y may\ci2�\ \ :� ��� ��\ �`Y\\�\�\\�\\ay\�♦�1:�\♦ \�x2� "S ti a:1c a.v\ \ � \ _ z \ � \ \� � ♦� �. \ a\\ �' \'lam ., � \, x• 1� - �U„`v..u`�,°v a x 1�♦ x♦�y`.>�♦\S'l $ �V.�'�, *z S'1�U\�,:`T� k v`v�,� �\auv�7>< �\♦\ a� U♦�\ \\ua i�♦�\Uv♦\�\ `\£Y' .���A�L\\tea\*�v��\\��Z\� \^\`\'?\�t�����l\��� \♦�,`� �`\\����\�` v � '� �. ♦�♦ v v e lam, A Y' •A.•\\ �\ \♦ v a v �.`. � ;v♦'* v\�vy\` � �` �` A V �� va v a\ ��Y i Ava�.A aZ vh��� �va�V`eA `.LVx v v A�v4��AV�V`�A Y Vv\�\V `..'.•y a v : .°. �e�i V\ v A v\♦v a v♦�'� •v♦� �c V �V��'A\�C: vv •� w vvvC` i•♦v yG \\ Avi y • xQw:�`, At V AK V. ♦ ry A A`C`a` � V v cAx\i• � \V♦�A\ v ��Ati\, V'C�: • •A�\ O�\vlU x v♦AxA an vA \u"♦��v a MV v\i♦� �vv � �\ � x #\��\�V\vw A�� \v.V °�A � VA v♦ �♦a 0 • A v v \ u l • EVA v t \ x ♦ V♦A♦ �Av � V A y v \ ♦V A ��'`�.Ah,. v A\"A \,A va'^VA;,,�vvvs ♦ti\v'a \•��Y.`� h `�x. ♦ �y .'b ^� A A�, `v h ♦ �.♦ •�v♦V v AV A'\.A �\ \ Y". v a \�a \• <c`s v v "' Z C U4 v • aw♦ � v A ♦. v'\ Uc CVv ♦i2+v`v\ x\ �. A.♦Y\�♦.A♦•A\��a� \� A`-C`t`r•`�V.A.Av\ 1 ♦v A�C;��♦ �\��A�v AA v�t♦ �a�\q \ �a\V ., \� vCAa�p\�Vv Aa'�� �♦a.,* �`i\k�*''°`�A a xv e A \ �\ v A\ o hi ♦ x t F, ♦�. ♦hyAA•A \ a`,Z. xv♦��V \u ♦�� RvV���J��� \��\ ��v��,�.:v♦\�a�\��i\v�\Y��$'v��_��� �r v y ,.ti1� A�`\wV'Yi �♦ v�b \. VAU�♦���'�♦YY yV ♦v���♦c ..'A�V'��a' Av \ � V : v � a\ ��♦A♦ °V _:. yY• �A• '+v ��`.A�v vA\i,�'"�\ \ �v ^�'�;• \v\\\a�� ti 4 V A\�Al`vat��V�A�v� _w♦a y v.� \i A\v �1 ♦�\*� v• ♦♦ x yVa\�\•\\\�'x'r�A�\\V♦Ax •�• • A\i���vV\�VA V'°'.�a v . a a v A♦va, �� a !\k av V,�♦v\i•�t w\Z�\w\\�`V.♦vAv ��v'c\�:y�j�U 'tv''v\v� �,�\�ilA v y ♦ \, A�A\\a�\���A�`vA�`�'VAA�i`Y�•vtA\��u� \A 1\�♦��A��^�A:A�va�`����\�A��.�\\ ����`V'.`�K�� A U`v� V y �V �\♦\\goy\�.•v�A\ v'♦••��r♦ \\��\A�`..� ♦A\\,v�\�R�A�•�vv AVv•>r, vo v �♦ \♦.,i'. ' ♦• AA \v^.A \\�.vv\Vv�v\� ♦a\ � OVA �\�•��Av♦\�tv � �,Z�� v\VA���u\�V . v � ♦V A`v v +♦�\vvZ<� �Z v♦,:,'cv�@,v� A�♦ ♦ � ,°°r \ 2v V A yvv��\Av� • °^��'♦vv \.v�♦ZVA♦ �♦\aw`a�� vA\\1 wvA\�•A .. �VA yVvv�VA v\ .�`A V•�A\�\ v �\v�, Y is ♦♦� �♦v\A♦ � \�\v��,.�\�Vv�� .,� \;� \b.v��4v��>v A\♦♦2\ 4h �'\vvr',i''�`x°x AV \ z 4 A � vvU��w�V V• \ � v a. Av..<V V vy\�vA�\Vv„\\,ro♦V v �A V A \ vvv �4�VAA*v\. vAAZ\:�v\ v V \ � �! \U�v avAy:Ary A \�a�VAy�•r vv\:�• \�`l Ua- v A��iwa. �Y• xi'a;.♦Y�♦ ♦ A -... ♦ v v' .�vA v �v\�\o `\A♦�,��\> v v x�A-kv�vpse',vA�.��a��`��w�v�� � ��a ` �y ♦Av�.�,a�vvV vi\�,�a v�a� ��``\�u�Av ♦A \\ll•v♦ a.��\.�` V♦���\V°iv� \vi \ A � V \V ♦ vv �v � ♦A.A� V vvA v Aa i♦. \ \Q\ A\vac� \• • 'V A A v h \s,A � ♦ � ♦ v • \V \•♦ A� v♦V\ �V♦ ♦v wA�\v •A vv�v � ♦ vVA � x.' •° v AA VAtea V v \V♦A\ -v A• •. `ivA'`�n • AV• .,v '� vvv\VAv i •; ,,,,Av \ v. \\A VAA�\ ♦�� �C �V ♦A v,,aV .,Y �\�4V�`v AAv• +vv �\ v, ♦♦ � ���• *'�'`���v\Vt���'4 v�\M,i��♦v�A A a w��� •�V>,� ����♦Y�Av\{\��♦�\��A \��\vA - Av v�Z. .♦\ \U a � \V�V A� 1 ��l\� V A ha ♦ C v ♦ A♦ U S Y v 1 �♦ A A V `Z♦ ♦ U vv v v\ vA<♦YAAA v AA` v���vv vv •' iA4c• v v� Avv A A A :,� vA1\vAv Vw"♦\v� �\.��v♦�i\'.w'�v v�'Z�`\v�>�.y\♦v >♦ vas• �� • A \V AA Uv\ ti \'\�V \ �'`�� v. AA�c �♦'�..�vw• � �v���Aw��\♦'v4: im is lac \°` \\♦:�h > O�\�s.�`�c�Y � a \\a- a ;. ?' , l f Fiscal Year 1990191 RAI1L,Rl3AD ,jkJECTS � . I.A. COP1'PI1ViJEi3 OR ON d'iO1NG PRt3JF?CfS. �, 1) ' Iviilb6n Avenue at A a's.0'R.R.xGrade Separation!and,Street Wi Street 4 Jersey boulevard Complete Design, .CcinpF¢fe-.SPRR and PUC Processing'and:Begin CogastrnctWn ') T�TAAu na, Avenue at S,P.P_:E Grossing and Street Impp'r�ovvem nts Complete Design and Gomplete$PRR and PiJG Processigjg,. 3) Maven Avenue at A T&S:F RR.GrossingImprovement rasaplete D inn sand Complete-SPQR,acid PUG` Pr ocessing 4) Foothill Boulem at S.P.R R.GrAde SdparationYmptsovement' Complete Design and Continue Caitram SPRIt. and PUG Pk6cdzirII V24 I t3. NBVt PRp7EC'1.5: ' No Projects submitted - �I tf, Cie _ q W i hVC `� �•Y�`�'uf"i X' `i 3 �,y. � 2>y <" `T � f ,t"''•�;i��2s`��'>� �?���.'. .. •irk o f'.�xa. \ �?`V :�a `xJ .;\.y. ^� u}'f5`.`. * 2�a��Sor.�,( L����`��a T � '#� A a<•a %i.3.:*\ ..�',y.W � �'Y z 0 ),�x S\ �` 'x'xyz.�`Y.,�'F'�a._?�{• � ,�a`t�',� p\'�'� �� ,��R�3as b. -a\ n'§���q�iv A<�se,'<k£��auvv��`• .�<T�k +Z �� $�<. a � �. Y T M'" Ak�`v\aJa w.`€`k �'D��o'•' �s.,,5u" c, �,i .., k'f` \ \1 �\\ ,: T "q'a We Wt, d v`x'° `ii`%� e��C �hV3�btl>. �.",'•f,�,`s��'ui �,iax,{$�;���} <rY�fi. ,ya .Ya �i <�''`'e\�\a, z; fi L x vk z�,\"C8 y✓S,Tr, .'c M\��vT�'^; �,�p� � � k � .. � 7aY y Y T Qyy(a�" l�; @. F. Sx •s is 'n `a ,.aa 2J # r �� \ , a 'pg,3� x R�l�cYS�aa\\,t„�e'`g�\ `'a� `§a,.:. c u, �@ �T?.rZ.,#4zi ,� .y � \ �, \ \ � \D �.S� a• +a\�ST3'`\\k,3.x'a�`�\��aS�` � �'s. �Z " •,3.��\.`..•� �,,, � � � �. ,�x �� `C"Ya a� �z \t\aaa`�\\�y�aY y'Sx3'T,`."\�.��.�v"?P..,`r✓` \ ��'� �\ �'���s.2�?,.•, \\•ems M � x 5� T� sum xx \� >� i� �e :M '�:r,r.� \\ ., •.xv \^� ���+,��` �"'• 5, =6Fy T Q•�a� �€. � ��T\�>`<F kti \ � r �♦ �< Da>; l� J � yam: ,,� � �zv� 3•g �. x y T \.� �i �y,v� �,, a \r$�i'�I:,\ � ��K�a�.' �#,\5, \.. �'�3�v\`<.\ �s\ ` 4`�}� \a���fi•�����a� ''' "�� ice` �w�tie � a: ^<��•\ ,i;` � ' ',`k �aZ,`����.�`� > \$.1'1 fi <,\ Offi. Jkv ° ��� \fi s ���� C L ♦. v l@� f � x�� ' �: k \,,�� \z �� 4�x��T2 xk< F����'w��'��?� \ 2,�1.�A`�a,>���a i ,a'<. i.• �..L\� aa'4`'"a'� ��� ,z-.�vai ra'a^ ''a'C Jss\\ \i ,�•':,:°v �`�, ```� ��b�R >r x <•aa a�a c�$.�`�.� \� xDv\,\\ >i�,D"\ \ ��\\\x y�K` ifi �� � � ��\��� t r. y% Z\ asT <„ ` tT? \ \�. \� ;y •� \ °. l uJ \ a '.4.a �sik �a\ \ \ r �K i\ av^•CtS`�'u`D\a xv`•"`�'.;[ii�,�1\i`\ #'" i\1.��' \� k \ @ v•:c.>, S � C\t, a t o Z F a �.:.���� ��yZ.d<`aa\�xc.�ec�` x .\@ 5 i \. T 1RA v�Y1' S a\nx�\rJsja? T .J �� - a ^v 'x i�„ s�.� h 'u $` i,.w`�e i� "a'�..F` c De\sue,�,�•4`,� \'�`\�i$�`4`°,`s a\ ,a '���. a� ` E \ 3 xs r � .:' xsas`'\ •�ia.3J'\ r 'xt?,<k �," '1\ ` '�3'a' .$ 4T + T >ck kJ;;,, r\ f \ x > \Jxxfi`>, 3#h\Y �:v\r."aX zx 'a� CaSfi t�� �M \4�3 2 x a r s f. Fiscal I mr 1990191 S'T ^ETc` PROJECT L A. 1) ' 19t4 S M=t,,Street tend Storm T-Imin Improvement Carnt"'.ail:w west i;`Aletliyst Complete'Caltmns Processing ants,Construction 2) loth Stieel, Street IMn v;inea¢, Atjchibai3 to west oi"Haven.`avenue `Constri:cEota , r Ametlrst:Avc ua StreetendStcam'DrWnImprovement At 19th Sit ,... Co=*lete CoriArustion•Adidrinestrataon 4) Baselim-269 Street'Improvements " Phase l-Etiwtmda to M5 Coal peatc Conagrnction 5) Easeline Rand;Streetlmpr6vemontc - Phase�-Victoria Park T.htte:to Etiwanda Avenue Complete :Construetion 4 6) Baseline Road'Street Improvements Phase 3-East Of Da Creek Channel to wesco�f Victoria Park Zane Complete esigtt and,Asgeiire RigDit•of 4;ay, 7) Basa',.ine Road wd R4illiken Avenue Reimbtusemag OentralrF'ark Frontage kteiniburse'Devel®per 8) ArrowRoate,,StreetInTrovements Phase -Southside Archibald toHeincisa Complete Construction Adnrinistratio:i 9) Amw Route, Street,Storm Drp1h and Sigaa171nprovetaent Grove to Baker Complete Design 10) LVccmonga Clerk Bridge Widening At Arrow Route `. Complete Design9 'Compyeee Caltratts ancE SBCFD . Processing and Cdastruetion 11) Church Stmety Street Improvement Archibald to HW, Complete Design aad Ac4iflre Mg-M-of: Gay 12) Foothill B4dlevard at 145 liaterchange linprovetients Complete Desig% Zotnpletd Calta'tins Project Pe6cessing and Sevin b6fiaruct on' �. 13) 13th Street,Highland Avenue and Haven Avenue;Street anal Stott Brain `� � Improyemen� 4 Phase 2-Haven end tlattd Improvements Complete Design and Cq-�piete Caitrans � Praessin avenue4he14} SieraMaoa t tmpoemnts . , Army Route to ViaCasriUo, Complete Construction Adanarsis4a atimm 15) 'Amethyst Avenue; S"tteetlinprovenzeats North o£19tIi Street(at F re Station}to earth of Hrghlaad Avenue' Complete ,Carestessction, lb) 10iLson Avenue; trt Imptive nt u Any thyst"to.Aic�ilsalrl Comp a&R '£3essg 17)' Aicbib.0dAvcnue;;cireetbvrovernertt Sowth bf)lUftyan to MUside :. ct®ntiad�te':II?esigtt,:" , 1 a} &;r w"outz; Street Improvement: East'o£k3err rasa to Maven Cnaglet -Construction 19) B pyan; Street Improvements Eastwood to Hellman Complpfi Lesign and.Cgaistl ue3ion 20) FoothM"e'm' e'ntation Progtarn Phase 1 � 1*1 Caplete Cniiratas Project Report Pa°oees hag 21) FoothiR Boulevard 1 p?enien'aaoh Phase F,(etist) S.P.R.:,to Lion ;Qesi ,.ESeegteIre'Rght-o£-Way and Regih C?.i an ' IProject I't relit Pr6cessina Phase F(west)-66vC to SFa',Z.R. Design,, .Acquire and:Regin Cnitsans ]Project Forrnit Proeessietg �.) ��dAvenue;�StreetTsnsprovements � � ;._:I I3e<rnpsa to Mayiierr�� Cornpiete Gaaisiructi6 23) Salina/Vin ear; Street7mproveinents ' it Calaveras to Sierra Ma&e Completre-Design and CQnstrvetion I. 24 Sierra 1 ftdre• S III tm,et Imprrivertants Aftw Raate to 9th Street Complete Resign,and Construction I 25) Banyan Street Bridge AtDear Cr&k west of A/iilliken Reimburse IDevelnper I.B. fj�PROiFf'P� 'a. 7 - i) Rochester Avenue.Strect In overnent Victoria Park Lane to Lark Drive(north of future High.School). Design If.A. f AP i MAIN I ENANCF`=(Y3NTIIVL1 3M07FCTR. 1) Hillside R64- Street Rehabilitation and Intprove t Hermosa�to P�day Caitepletonstryction Administration 2) Haven Avenue Rehabilitaton and Widenisrg..' µ 4th Sbr Ctd south of Foothill Boulevard :Complete Design, Complete Ca ltrans Pro'essitt , and'Begin Con#ruction 3) Camelian Avenue andVineyard Avenue Rehabilitation and Widening San Bernardino Road toBaseline Road .. Coreplete'Design.w . 4) Haven Avenue; Strom:,,Sigma snd Storm Drain Improvements Phase 1-South of Fwthill Boulevkd to north of Church Street' Coutplete Design, Complete Caltrana and SBC IH Processing and Begin Steed Construction H. B. CAPTI'AL Iy ARMENd!NCE-NM Pl2©JLG"1S 1) Bicyele/PedestrianPro,Pam. Handicap Access Ramps-Northwest quadrant of City north of Baseline and west of Archibald) Design and Corstruclt. Aor,_ 2) BicycleMedesttyank'rbgratn Sidewalks adjacent to Don Tapfa Park. . Resign and Construction 3) My Wide SidewaWCurb anti Gutter-1911 Chanter 27 Improveaint Program .- Design and Construction, 4) City Wide Local Street Rehab.and Maintenance Pmgram(FY 199001)1.. Design add, Construction 5) Haven Avenue; Street,Signal and Storm Drain Impr ogerrents Phan_e 2-North,of Church Street to north of Baseline Road' Design and 8egia Staged 'Core tructicin , +1 1) Wilson Street Bi.Aje - $ Deer okwee�"ofNWUken 2) Hlanci Ave,r,ue Bndge1`1 Der f:�ek puss;t�Yvtilliken _ 3), 24th Street; Stteet and Culvert Imprcrvents San Sevmna,Creek 4) Ward=BuUockrOad,'Suet and'Cutvert Impivveuients •- Sari Sevaine_C r �` tr �z. i ♦ as�`♦ ��i. \i��L�. �♦ � k� �� �\�3g � w ZE�� < x e �\s\� ��;�, 'q�♦j\�` '�<'�,��?+�=;�nP''�''-�'�zZ,?;♦y,..��' �. . .;az �. \ �Si�Z@av t� �u\„ ,�w. �N'}�y�a�fi",�`\i'�,'`\\\aGR` �..`,�..s`� o;� �5��\ '.♦A� : ,5 k�, \ \ `\� x�s��.,. 0,,,�� \�3zvxx �a\a�\„�\xJhx � ���¢'�"�'��� ♦ .' ` �` ��•� _: ;y` ` \ `•o` � ��+.a�`Lx�� y-R�gtzol y\",3s�`y�`a..�y�i��\���•�z ,z„4�, >' \\ \ :` ` ♦\ e \ ��` �\♦�z�``? ak ��;\ � '`��'a,�,\�". \k,�\ z `\ \ ice\ ' ' s ����rzC �� o iz \♦� r �' .♦`a g � �` �„ .n a'sii:. a�Z ?s`` �S\♦x \\i \�v♦ .g`\\i. ♦ 'z�•ii,,,,y:�` \xfia, a:. xi`.y� \,��.♦� � `�\ `: �` \ �`\\ 4�!'`w�"`c3'�ik�\.�..\'�'��`� \'�,,1-' w� u�`\'C.'a`♦� ''xt z}• '� ,�,♦ �\`\` �K�g a t Zc. w \�. a w` \� a �\♦ ti Z a \ � � Z ,'rg�i'iY \i `BONNz„`� "a k♦`i_.. \ro'si ''\� �� `\' •♦�.♦h.,��.w`.,C�\ .,t r`♦:�\�♦�. : ..�.,\,���`��'',`\s'�\ •'; �`xx c.,\xxn� \ �\�w.`��� as \ `� ���'4�'3 `1S' \FJ z�'C,- \�z♦ ♦ Z' \`�:� ° s x sk �.\ � l.. �.��'z�'!�`ikzz'�a♦`�`����'�Y���4`♦\`\�v.`�" c�w•Z`�`:`'` w \`�``�iw"zKia �" t� \_ ♦� k a \ \ ♦ a 'n�yi�;,.♦ �N kzF�1� z`�'' f\ °aN`5 ♦ �3iw�•\titx�eIM ,fi \.:". \�z .,a h ,; ♦ �� \ `t3,,: \.\..vr.`sQ` � K �\ Q\ \ •cv ♦` �i � �,\ i. � ,zx♦��`:�..'� 4 S♦\ d`i �a x.2 i�\°`•'\C •\ "�ar�k'&. ,es �'�:�' 0 as �a`a, g. ♦ �� �. Yc♦Sx- '��, \\' g" x �\`�`i"\z ca`xK''\.k\ � ♦� "' `e'a.\`'.`.,._\.�� �,,gg cz�w, I�� a',a ♦ ri\''• zc,,`me\�`''vza., w�' .w \\a `\`\\` °� 'z\��" ^c\ ♦ \\ ::'`�`�` a�\�.:'� '\'a ♦ '��t �`,� �, \ 33,,C�\\ hsl, i a 1 a 2 ♦ \ Z r � S z\ ?�,��:ar.,� �"C "`\"\an \ �� x ♦ k'l�`k.�xw,♦;sa'x'z\ `k� �S �a\g♦ �� c����ra \ ♦c i �\ z5�♦ �afiF�'��\��\��y,�ywa .,��\�'�.<�� �cs"�c\�L\z',�.�.��'Z',c��`.,' `"z'\� �`gr,.�Z�aLZ`"\���.�� I '� .q ti" \�.:\ xqh\ a `,. wyl��'�a♦a:y 4 vc♦rg�„ r4 , c\\aS.\,,",:`"."`` ,:`\\ r�`\Z '.'�;% ,F'x, .v a;�?:�,D���. �� a' z� as•Z�lx���a �'a`� ��=a`��,`U�t:3\\��'� w,3ti �\��`�.\ �\.� `'�� L I \� r1`ia�".\a M"'"�`�z'�zi�-� 'a♦�♦ i�� `x fi�,r�\♦. h�\ k,;��'° `a'`,�\������yk�Via` 'z „ ! ♦ w z�,,y' -. s na�`a♦�\ •,,, ¢a �� `,`� �zi a 7�aC�♦u�\'\r'���"�� �x" s \\ � � .♦ K � � �a s\y.'��•-: y,♦�`�' � �ar\i R y���\�`.\�a.�ti\y4\.�V\ �\\"a�`\��x`�`r ��\Zn��F.�♦3 i >?: . .s`t�?`\ ♦ .', :Y t, \',r',; �v`.\ gi a�♦�^F\i�a\a k3i♦,,, �\� �` kci` F♦\ ". t� Fiscal Year 1990/91 TRAF IC PROJECTS L A. f'URIT�t�T R t�TiP II�VVC.PROJEG'1'S ,,: 1) Signal-19th Stivet at Beryl Complete Caltrans Processing and Construction 2) Signal-19th Striet'at Hellman Complete'Cal ltrans Processing.and Construction. 3) Signal-Baseline atEtiwanda Complete'Construction 4) Signal-Baseline at e:ictoria Park Lane Complete. Construction 5) Signal and In Improver r:,nts Foothill at Rochester ? Complete.Caltreins Processing aLd Construction 6 Signal-'Baseline&Ramona .Complete Construeiion Administration 7) Signal-Baseline.atValencia }' Complete Construction ;dminir l(}A S) Signal-1'9th atfiermosa Complete Design and Complete,Caltrans Processing , 9) IYpgmde,Signai-Amok at Archibcld Complete Construction Administration. ;. 10) . Sig nal-'Aarow at Hermosa Complete Construction,.Administration 11) Signal-Haven at Victoria Street Complete Construction Administration ' 12) ITgzade Signal-Foothill at,';1-15 Com late'llesi Complete p �� C tnp ete Caltr ans Protect Processins and Begin Construction 13) Signal-Foothill at Ramona Complete,Ylesign 14) Signal Coordination!.Haven Avenue., Complete Coordination 15) Signal-Archibald at Lemon Complete Construction Admmistration t - 'x 16), ,Signal-haven at 7th Stmet Complete Cotastruetloar�Admlmstraaou 17) Signal Coordination=Archibald' Complete I Coordiaoti h` ` 18) Signal-.,Am hiWld at Sati Bemaedina ltoad . Complete Desigh and Construction, 19) Signal 'AiTbibaldav8th Street Cotnrlc;e 4SFiR, 'rocessin9 and`Constructiom 20) at Vnnsy'ard. 6 IA B�04.' o;, �. 21) Upgrade'Si ,Fo���tlmT arvu�eya� iL esia Caler"s,Project Peranit Process t 'r 22) Signal-Foothilh%t 73aitea1` Desap),'i rtid Begirt Caltraij Proj$et'pernat Process 23) Upgrade Signal-FOofWl at ban'Bernardino Road Design and:Begin Crltrans Project.Fermit Process 24) U'pgiade Sig*l Foothillat Cirovo . . Design and'Begin 'Caltrans Project, Kermit Process r 25) Intersection Improvetnents and-Upt�ade Signal-Footirill at Haven Complete l)esigntil�"Gm plcte Caitrans Processing and Constructiorn`�- 26) Signal-Hellman at,San Bemanl..�Road Complete Design and Construction 27) Signal-Highland at.Lennon Includes San Mateo connector Street south of Highland;. Cotiitplete Design, Complete'Caltrans Processiog ' and Construction, 28) Signal-Spruce at'retra Vista Parkway. Construction 29) Signal-14th at Sapphlre Construction 30) Signal Coordination-Vineyard/Camelian Complete Design and Coordination 31 Signal Co ordinadon-FootiIlB ul p' ad Complete Design and Coordination 32) Signal Relocati6n-Foothill at'Red Hill Coun4 Club Drive Design and_-Begin .Caltrans Pro4Qect,Permit process { I.B. *7EW PROJECTS 1 ; diesig i and Construction _ 2) Signal-l ermi&a.at Church . Design 3) Uniform Traffic Control Fiscal Year:'0)91 Major,tmd Collecid St ri its ; Design,and Congtruction 4) Traffic Signal Timing and Interramnection Program Stutlys �esign and constructron III.A. Mtib Sgn ON.QQ PRQDECTS Y) Signal-Footh at �J n 2) Signal-Foothill at rfY i) 3) Signal.-Foothill at Aspen cow ` = 4) Signal-Spruce atTown Center 5). Signal-haven atTown Center ^y r„ sy, �uzF�H�'�a '\"•3��^z>•r£k"t:3•x'b`3 v-\-�a�."�.s s;.'2 t#`. °'�Y�S�i`�Y 7 'aF �Aa�q\ rb:�\�ar� �\ � �(x.iM 4 *� �. xa+ �,i`�" xl�:?�,txi,''(r lx zg, � `�u h�"�.4 \'. l s�a -c,(`�`\l� �. \� � `� �` `��.""z�Z✓� _:a.\{♦ '�:44<5 'C. c\ \z��,.W�' �i�"`',�`r��Pa 2�C,.L�xz fit! ,.�,s.`'��ax'^3.�4>.x �C�, S'{''�g�n` 41~�sN•E y' (s\ �\�q•�a �.> ('31'�ku� \."x Sza \\i a��a `t�e''ys�e`�-*'�\a xS.a•o`��'v n,��ayy��A..sc a3^<y M L���kx��\.b��: a�k.�,se1�C\a �s�7s> _ �; \ za "v k. u \ a�wt\x .z`\x 4S � . z[z x�- r�e+i�Glp,yw. �`r'aY k Zs" Ka`(\ '�\\*`i�z'ra\•�Rr�'r ',�Z`�y,s�'Cs. . <\ \ ♦ g x �\\\ >c ♦ �� �C�ek'`�i�t ���z��•�:t`\\,y:e,�xx ` '_ �\ ti x .�Cy'�,a\ RT t \� ��S``ta�yy.��\\�a� �au '�. •a' �Z\��,:,, :.c:�Y 2 \�az.z\`C 't\ \�4 - :� sa,.��\'FCt'�` `v.ab��`n"al s �•ar*z eC. h\�\��e<z`�w\a:� (.a �\\ w�•�Z```'C��`. �_rc'*c��s\\ KdSv�ac \SeCKE a\ T q�y''•\.\\,'"�iaa�\ <\,x+.y,��?�.yL�*. 9 .'. ?�`z. ,�\�Yf¢c fez\\ \ \^ \ a\,C\ J�\ s\'x' �a;, \e � �,,o \�Z\C.�'� .h?k xs�y\'x',�z\"�ti: �.r^^.�£\;��\ s�Zti�\� \k3� y�\'•'u���\�y���� �a"�c?��� $'"�u\� y W\\ au. �"`�3\ R£•. `\�\ `\�"�`��\� � z >' `i\ ��`ta�?izZ\'`� �Y.S.Y.,r K w�! �,`�4C�.\ \vi��'s.'. r' \'\riY'; `` ��' `'� �„'\\i ��:\,'\a\"�i e`Z• `�:����e�` � .+i? :n1;�\.,t� ���z„� \ C a\.��� `v\x��v j i 5x„'� 'a �\ a :R�.� \\x\,\n �`\.`�\\�y`..� �.\ �.\ •f yx��a�'uk`�:��C ` �h � \2��0 Vim\ \�� ��\ �x`u \ ��r�. ...�\...aw '�\���a��`.yi�e�Cc" C xz � � •��•�\�"• ` ��\� \\`,�.�. s. '.K 4 \C � `a'+'En.\\�3'te��\�\�a:'{c�'\`\'•�.\y`�v\Sla. .�\ ` C'Y€z�\ �"' �w `\�\ k�'.' � \M �..�` \y '( J\ e r \ .3. a\ -\\\.fib ��`l•.\",`'. :'"4. \ y a \\ ��y\\.\`C\x\\ \�\ a., \F\ i7: '.\,n L ���.�L��3. .'\\`�����\\��\ �.�c'c�` '�?e1�.�C'itv.'�\��\``�. C,,:''�"`\a�`��\^�*���v��`���`.�;a�.'♦ \\y `y\\•>w�'� fi�`>.'�Z�♦\.\ ;a •`'x�\\'"♦e����a?\'``\�,�\\`'x\eke` .vim a. x� \\T��\\ \`4 ''\�u„ t. \,max '�\�.� �\�e\��`\• ay�a \\ ���� \\`„�,\.��e\�� \��\\�� \`Qv� �\�e�o�a�`\��♦•`� a \ \\ \, a+,`c\m�\` �\�x`Y\\\:. aFx v\� z Z•\r\\�`\ v���\� \ya c��..,��e\�\��� \ \\' a z z i z��.�\\\\ \��xx�Ux \ x +:\�` \''. � \\` ♦ �\\e���z\ �`�``���,\��L'\�'��\\\3�a s N r r s c e R F a e a. e = a a Y a a� c m E K O 0 g m C E o m O O Ul a a a` e p � � C$D� 8 mar7➢m s' Ile e ,i c < t - 0 g y m o 0 �y t S D m a F m w 2 � gtC N y m E E E 3 O E $ S7° <C -41 s 3 � a u7 _c y m I Am I! E ., w t il! 0. m • ®a� Nbi�vi ,co � e E m co m Ammp IL` r Ito m clil r In li rM. I H m m S E� k� 7 m a u, Hill I 5 m c� m o N1 m t m � m m ` {i s -0 a � 1c 32 E LL �; m0 ppB m aV mmjE�agE m d g C G a mS j:-e d m � S9ir y, O mi i iii � ii ii i ii i iiw �e� � nog � ' n o $ l N X X m m a�a � 1 m P Q r I � � z luji MI wi 121 r r10 4K $ e cc 0 cl of o $ rAa x O. ®:4 O y 9 c! a Cd t of Ed' y C1 o vi E > w 11 y m W ai J fl o N fi lui m t7tor, aa g N8 v M S 0. N ¢ Q r ac m m ¢ m ¢ M G- C. a 'O O O 0 F1 U G G COO I I I �f 6 w 1[t Cf N ID m N m t m � ' � s o u3 vi p aai yy O yy gq A q)� vi t!� Gi� g -t[t CL m 04 Is rc tic G G O n 0I UN II@I lfl II III III IIIII I III II loll I III HIMII IIIItlIN IN�III�����II II�IIIIII II ��i1em 111131. :,n II II�IIII : ICI K F N m a +, I �. F C N Hill . 11 . F n 91 m� 5 C m m 1� r O N m W C Y y m N N m �W do .62 a m � m' n, e m ` s m - - e off° _a _ - 1-1 e w m O 1� 6 a 2 M 2 2` e�em ' � II �I I IIIII gill �11111111 MilliI MiIli1wIII1 II III�I III IIIIN III ��I uiiuui Q x x Y m ~ 6 o Y 1 I I Ell - as4 deg U F w �...a w g r r N N N N Ito �n 'm , m E a a.. a G < m c , 73 25' 25 �f uS 2S �5 K �S E s 5 m I t em m t 0 8 a a = 3 c r 9 g o = yR < m '0- e I, NN a Oslo Iloilo 11 I1 milliIIIII N l� Mail 11 cm: III Milli m I E1111 if E i o m 1 �xiC C E10 N o ro 61 � o 1 a a d < oCL Al � x _ < Y -t 0 �a c� � F 0 A w m ``- 9 t) 0 c m I as J dd5(� ai O C mom. N a O a Q o 04 O o m I a m� �W L ai a of _ � b f� m ci a� ow � a� o m �gm Sm■ 8 O g v e m m C 5 m im o f 9� 3E u 0 I Z i' 0 m N m 8 S � S S a 25 � 2S Ei a Z5 8 m C. ¢ C $ a ST pp gq g C 6 C C C C Cf V M 4 h m O C N W a p m N N C4 to 19 La Ef o m s N N N N N N aj N C ,a ¢ r¢r m_ N m N 'aQ a LL mU c W m c(7 o 4 n 1 ! m m mn 6 O o Ry�t !I O I RI D 4 CL to < y og 5 gn ca d m V 0 0 ® a0 e ' 01 N ^ P1 V N m cc cc a O r g , m N X x -11 X m JI G r r I IL a a � m v', a m m o • LL ® z ,m N n ink n n n 2S yi 112 � i A f�J a r Oil -7k Q _u 6 4 c § p a n m 3 to g at m ra O I N co N W.. t7 1� ♦ �N t7 • _ I Y E W N a? 1 H , 1 II 1H 111 A111M >z 0 I 11 . 1 11 I il 11 1 1"1 1011 1 11 r>QQ S It 1 -:1 1 Mi" E C y� gg C �a 6 l a r LI ) N� m_ < W mU c ire E o m m m a' 9 cm m p 6i m m m a o 0 a a I]—=W! ii mU.. o E o� O g Els -11, r .�"Yf, � x v i .sic "SH`•K.$ s\ �`-s „, � ". 5, •\ ....� - 2�'. '�^ro.c`�ic 4�35 s ��� `�nc � � �.,�Sv � >�• ,2 s £t�kz x� 1e "§a•�, ; s��.�w sz�� zL � P.�.�•,,F`3 �.��y'V'•N.? i�'''�i �''c�' .�T y? ..>� �,Sz�„Y`. �. ��'F"�'?Q ztt^� 2 Z XJkS)> .�,f �Rt \tea Z;.Yc s'�£'��`...>x`a�'a 9 x : \^,sr'6F ,At\'"Y. sQ C��6 k'v yea �,�` �sw "� �k�SJ�s" \�'� b 3��udx\ r sYA t#,�`zay � Y \sy�#, T ���a �� �'�XAk�r•"`+i�„� .�". a£�e, c.� Ka�`,f'F.� '�afr`h"`�§�� `� gg IMP a � € ai;. s�s�J �, Q��� • "�\`i� \ :^F� � �,� f� ;� <¢ ,� N'g`a',"1.�,.%�a�.�'�?��\'�`��r x�rQ��3 @' `ekZx\�i�•�\'yi. 1�3.\� \ \ ��� �\ �^�'\, §. '$hza .§�, w^�x�'�C'�'�`\Ct�?�, `�`�Lc �; i\�`"\f�"b r'Y� `a�"a"Y.�L a\4 ���b �ei §s a��..'\ `� `) \ �. �v. • a��,,,.�, �.� ��,,.•"^�av\�.,��'�a'�uy��� i-\^3�, >,�..:t����§^.,.£ z�xL����1���K'� � F�a�t��§\`�y''•��Z��`„�3�'$€§�c .t��`�i`' ". �{...? \\ `ic yz�`\ `��J\a .xge�zc\ � �\��c.. Z\`��ae rS.,�`. ,xr�� 2 Z��: � z'@"' ia�ZJ\xy,•t�.�A, z�z,2` ^sti '�w\J s'•�a'' at x \\ v:n.��,,,�l .��x�.,,. p '�§^'�,>vs`.sn '\y. �2 � o \ �, \a��" c \\\•may.�..)<� 1n\\s£��`^a`i.,n\��,���'§�,`~;;�,\ ��������\�\`a ����\�`'���� �` � � `�x3� £\� `�:, z¢ a >�+,saaL-§'."R�,ac 2\z> uo�3'a"`�'i����+ a � •" �e FJ a)• .�34\ Ya \�.\ \ \ `��y�`�`'�z� '\� \xa`\. a £'.�§ @\a�,'�.\.'z�\k�v,'��z 5•�^\ `V.j�""yA\ \ \:...£°.1 \z � \) ' a�.\\`c�'ti§ \'�s:\cJ''` C§F�tv�•'��,}. �x3, K \�'``zap "\'. f@��`��h § \�i�`'.\�'\ '° i \ u� y ,�s�'`ai,`.'^,a•e' 'xe` '�'.`�4a� a< m e §`F�i\\\ '�..,,.\�� c,' \ \ fix \§ J`` a_. ^ ^ \ z• �\Qa�ik 0`iy\`�.x\d� \� \k§.�\\�' ¢ \ ` x`aScL ��\\����\\ i�w"S.'4��\�LcL,�'���\r�'`�x \ x.':, .."„ ``'sec�'\\ \Gx`?• : J\ ..\�. \ i\ , ,\�� '..v`c� !&� \\" `\\ � ♦C \ -t \\§�^§x� `�\��,.J\��``��@J\•�y,.. Z\�7�\z E�'\.a \�`�..``�za' ;..\\`i� ����,�\1`���`�x� `t`>��t ` '�'.ai 2 \\U:\s\ ��`§\\e,\�\. a \�\� � � i3'��1'@•v ♦ iL' �gjB'�at: \�\ ��§ xs \tea �@' \\'Jaa�,?\..rigs 4♦\ ••� \\ "yy`� , �"\ s \\ ,},. 5,;�?§�r,v<�\�•• fix a � \\. �an\'ao'L���;s'c�,+Z\�`:\\t` �\\\\ \��C�\'`.�\\\J�`,��%��'�• ` \♦\s'x� \Z\\.��,�s y\a nJ��a:.Q\\��\ �\., \i n\^,.nLP\ \`.\\ S �.�`�\�'S♦. ��z\\ \ \\�`i."`�`�\\\�bi, \a '\����0�\�\ � \�•\L\\\tom£,@'�:�.�a\y�� `�, �'a�S� \�\.��an�� \\'L ��\\�'�`�5,i \ � \ \ r \�♦4���\ \v�'\7,.F'a�\`3J.A \y��1�'�`Se\2'�.\���\�'G���\��\\�\:� \2.�<x..\�x e \ t ` 4 kc`\\�,c �ycC"�\.�� 3.\C \ � ) [� \§\(``\ �\Z\*`�..�a'i\��C`c •�\\�`"��\����4\�\^t\��\\��\\i< \sa y ex�i 3 `v - ) v i `v A . a Cz #V' a b♦ACZv� 'vV'\K\+@��� v�sva v vti a�J.� ��v vi O gm o C m ca Win 0 R a- a m: :a. co y a co i m G � J.. m t; �... .... lw �, �i o $o a 0 c� m om n cs � f y c v d : Al `o :�. c R s cx 0 G � In �� p. 3 Y ,� m CD G N^!. H tli H tlf H Vb H H V➢ K. N m Q. pp. ep pp pp 06 S ep pp op pp po q�q O t0Nn.... O f�.. �.Of O - Q NO�y �.j� N M ri N, K N M /T H :N f4 a w N W A D O m 9 �! 44 7 N N! Fig m m m A A 79 cx C. � c� to m W to N 1- !- 1- != '1= 0- -F` 1= F '1-' f`• m x m m< rn x � g S '' mcl co Go iE 7 t� t7J t7S to N 17- y dj q o 0 0 ? CD P. 0 P P Y 2 a a- i m.Co m N N NIN M N z; o ' 'n,m. N M H N W M O Y O tl V tl tl tf V tl O tl O: O 6i t1 �3 m w m � CL 72q �s . a in ta ca 7 � .N- N C � x I� cl,' m +. ® eq La L6 � � N Q { a 44 N C6 m o F m Go 4 m 'F �s Q .n ucl Y �4 7 �r i� q � .ui A :o x � CD C my '7.bA ;N� Vi w m ca M~ a C m m ci co m '. c n Mo m my. ,3 CD a m•�: .: 4�; i a m. - m 9a`, aS w �a`, �a �{ oito LJ L�y IN Ti q r c V r/ 4.� 1i �... 11 1 t f' �r �i CS t2 �p � t y e9 iX _ i. ta 40 N . C O lY <9 CN -ttiN ID ;� _ Oms a m- mto m m O O V ca {�nn O1 r F w :a i m E m c a @ _ c 0 IL co LU a 63CD ! w wr u z Jc 0 (A h Y� c ; v ! �' rj m O OO 'cm r c g m I Qat, d AY N V W m N a'o N iti w e� W A 0 r i fQ y � b F AM ag �o �d CDs J to a � �Z m T A P � 9 C 3 Sal } Q t. i k pp s •�m M H E os ma i� Z :y s t �m w 0 4 06 t m 1 CI Q. F, F m z°O a p a ® I Yyf e' 0 NN i CS m 40 3 a o y► m i K r 6. O O tD O A C m C RI .'W l0 W m ltl /9 Q9 {0 r, 9 A a OE e ca u6 vV ' o E g a rE .'a ,a 3 tom m � ua 19 3 T� T s3• ?� c .a 1. 3 LU 1C1 � a N N N N N• N N. N N C � 4 m _ NV o m 78 � 1 c Q c m' ro m'. 03 m w "o a � a m rn a 9q }, a IS cLa ca g ma » v a m � wx. x No Us m a s m a^c a o' 0 !L �<c �u aSu'm z, E Q• Wit m a 99 } A cc to It" LR. Q W �� 7, r4 i 14 rf' Y" 'I E ARI � �► Cl at R $ 'sSs �� Q .. m W W A A w p A ^A W 9 ..9 9 TJ cm 16 m.' 16 W to to 0 a '.IL lz 0. A al 21 or m u, m �.a tad v cis y�j to us N } Tr . - cIN m o co < a W ca0 ..c? 40 . 0 to CA F. O N Pd 4'. � N Oi N N f/Y CL u. >> W N CF M® N fm m m ' m m ,� m �, m m• � � n � � ,� ��� a O s . ® ro b s ge a ;i w W a = d G ul 10 cs to n m n M nAl cl FS.' 11 � a y a co w i co _r M r- m b m ® o � JJ � - "} tiJ it; m yp W' iNf MO. M W �e lV 0 0 !� ! � I {yam _ cr 'T tr fit is m m m m m m c c c c c c c c m m m O o Im a a (e r 1 IL m ci s U VD GG ex 11 pa G O C9 fD too. m 1�A m `~? w 7 W ® mcn 6 o a a o c o ¢o ,Q c o a fl a cc a . i3 c d► m m S � g o' in m � � IS 0 o m m N m m 03 m o" ci a m � m , t wo pCIS / l RE J' a p 1 �F w - ' r s, N w r i m a 9Z � m o a. I a to u m . M AL _ a 1 i `�- � � m m tl. LD 8 e o ^^ a wjr AN, m 7 mm a u, VD,en Vim' a cl 'r s m =. a d m N m Q E o x �Q, OM ga m � 'o S ti c` saQ a YOU¢ 06 $a � aU� 73 tp aCs ISd as m O d N c,0 c c !y C4 f7 H Nl74 ui mewN07 o u .� U gcm ~ ' cr zD t m r U R 42 es It S� 4 y a J u.+ cr cc c M '� �,. 9 y mm40PLr m O9 td m, r m m u v m 4! a C o ID w to cc „ . m m. N. o 3 o c 6 e. �. y i, m c .a W .. m �1 a: mCd kt c y A aj m f I SAS n Be 8 cc0 CIS a o $ $ w in w in u) no to c$ A.A^i cb c:^S o3 cn c$ 6 6 v5 di: Ch � r e- n m.A Q 2 c o . a `n rs ; 77777777�-­��­ '-' a a "C" a a 34" a a' 's �s cl m is ti r r i m.. C Q' 7 ® a 3 m c C3 totQ "y 3 �))y�' � `�� _' .� r .Pot a ;` .��� t z,� �;?. � ��•... z« °k. Jn'.+�W�{�a�t Y a3z � a� t �:s�: $vz •va' ` -��''r£.e,�',^'����' ♦ �..as .: <:zY'a=' '�� ,tz+.a .z, e `�.tx. >. ' '♦`.��Qxi3`�.'�f3 w�� ,�£-�Q/. �'« Q, is,a� Q mow.« �za I C;` 'l'`: ."z?' �V'-,�3���?>t a 'iv, k�,., t< 5Zu ): ' y \ � "�,. ;.oc.♦�kvS '��d��...h.��h3{21tQ'b��>2.�,`� a�>" „k t Le« Yo. a\ Y JJ a t 'N. ♦.� : Y xa,> i k'a.n.Q'�•� '"pis>`s.• � ' 'a '�a w .` ��"2. , .�_,. _ �3'>s�.z i£:�5`�ta. ;t QJ \ „a�S�" t.< a' �,zl"i\ '�' A+ ^Fi. ''>C♦ N. 3�'>' {C S. ,',>�\'�x3'cc`s,`Yk`"L`> 'iQ. �,�� ii y♦ t�Q,�' ..a> '� �@ '�. ♦w, �, *�, I '�''a�``c3�'�♦���a�,s���ty3��Y k\.�b. ><�µ ` Qy' f n�\.. `��4.0 \�'�` �F ,g„�; 4'' �♦'��ac H�y�� 2 a�$h�`� �$�c '�\• \�"",ay.�'C \k �cv♦ ♦ kn x' Y\ Y,C - F� � 'dye�i C�� �.rs`h,° >� �e2t\ �a,��a a ��. �a� _°�� � \•• an..F v` $� tx\^+ `.)`� a,',�oaY as Y a�zc)♦.�K> °iY�� ,���a;'����� `�z ^t�'F♦ . >k' `'x' �n�"' y � °'Y�C�i" >`♦\a),(��x�i♦�a ..:�`��\�`�°'`•'�'�\�"�..:?" � c''£` a ..ni..;`.`, �Rc�',>`,Q, "�<G. \ ' `\,.` t� .\; � 3'i3♦sx y�:�>5Z Y•� k�"a, "e, �' ,. c♦ ,; a w •,� ... '\ ♦ "4v cb'Jt?S��i �Z`o�. >.,g�j,,.``Q, �e4u���� �`.:���?,� ♦g � a.:�x��\L �� 4Z��'�'��� '� ���"�\♦'S ��zy�\������Q``�'>^���\ °..n.Z'�\ ,v7,�', ;iS:i'� M,,6i°w.�\� ,\�a�',C 3:,\ i"\Y> .>v �"�a�c Yx�'ya. zy ''�'.y�a*`�`,��\`pk�''sx c' 2���� � ��`� k u c ' ,�� ;\���; ♦k\Z��,�Cja '' z `�`' �. �`o`y.�.♦fir car�� `k �;. ;� �' �3 'z�\b` ' ,♦ � ♦ �``� '♦. '�.� <"`.♦, �'aw°�b''an?n�"x y. <'*�:�• a s' ���i� ��,t.C�'t, �� ,N d,♦•�; �q. ��'ya+z ♦ �ex�c' x3'>�,�42: z � oc. ,�,'... �.r�„a: �,��x'�tiy,F♦�), �. \\ ,w,` �µ` �..� 'ii.` �y<x,at° bs '�+rr��¢ �F� 1" \ >�t \♦=C\.�`.@ �`F'`ett �:\''\ '`\ '0Q.l�<6 z� .. t &�.,.�r` J3` Z `� � .,,,�� �'`,�>� „v�>.,z"���F �'a'�``•♦�' t \*2�\a a�� k > s� �� >t y,"" a•.�qtl>,. ° nzi'' o,`'�x"a\ �" b :'Q\r ♦ `i �," �C�a\ ♦ c k ,3�ra 'v`a� �>'@& ♦"�)' �'z�', �SpZ,` w�;` Via♦\'. �.a,� 'zkS,'�� �b� i zQi'z\1 ''raF''��;�i ,a'�` �"� � �rwy�.�'�,,.'♦ �F[4t\°�*; ibk���`ai'� � '"'ac��i\� \:�F�:H` a"�''�i)``,� \ �+ � i> \< \)kr??-.\ C�. �:t w 1v.'�ik:j.�k=�♦i �, o? ,�'ya:r�zz,x�' ��y.=£`\ 3Z�'� � �'� ��`�'.a. \\,�Ce s, k'C 1 �i°4FvX\ .'^,�\`b+.' �v,'`ba�4>,..��y. i.�'. \t@i t,>'r';� k\ ♦i.,Q';4:'C'Z\ v`' ,�a>♦� max, e v a �'4z �y= •.�>�F;,C�c"`.��\,lF�`2.pa ;k♦ ��'��a� °�� �: '����\"§,C�♦E ,�.,� `�'"�zi' r ��"; iQF��'•�\ � \�'"�♦•�x r;�`�\�x\`��"Q�'�g� "FQa>�x,� �:\ �•, ♦F� ,,,♦,♦��.,,'a ♦� �,,��.• 3 ♦�. ,n>\ � t `�a s #c. �ct�heQ�`et°`�` x �` .�,��,\`���\`�'>ya;�", ♦�.`��vY♦C���,"�':>t, '' � �,.vr s, 'z��'u'k''t��i��♦�)� y"\ e`,��e.'�� �\ •, a��'� Q o\ z�`rv,`,\V"` >zj„ "� gy°r\`; '.t ,� » �`� >\ak�s °� y� ,b: .z* Cia�.'?;aCC \`�'� �.� h"�,.� `w♦ \�' '♦' `'�" `, �` �`x�yk� £ \ x a3 -'�w'r 'C. C:"�:�` 3��`3'°. 4 .Z\i Y' e. ;�� `2`♦ -. z $`i v:.£Q, °� e'��'����^ apa,a� ���k� ��z♦ of � °`i'♦♦i ��\��: \��� xk�Q'�,`tyr;♦ rc;��i�Q '� ?. w�+'$ \*i a� �\x\'4,v„��-.♦•• ��T 'n ,�'����5. '� )>,t)i �'`��♦;aa�C.♦: ��\,`h\�.. �`. ��: `�r� ,l �, ,�'. 3,♦\,_ r��,,„a.k�,ar3 s,<`Q1z, ,fi„,i)�'�xt a� �"��„ \`v♦e)sF .,"'c,<. w�i�e,�,��^�5��.,\ ♦♦�`>` �* y k•"t 0 Y ♦'i` -)�`>` \A 7in>xb.° u �.�`�;>r?z\�\", t � .a.���'��'`,,`;z"� � �x� n _ Y �� ak7s yt�:. , i,�,,�'�"k a"7�5 ,1�a a� >kz�.�;� c \�i 'L, \♦.`x '\o�,a�Sa♦,aS��:-\� �%ex�cF € qs,: Y s\ R �.�.s3�`., a�5x'�4� Sxa kb'� �v^aF "xk-b\� a�.*�\a�i.�`�.'\\.,' �*'♦'C>��:ZL C.♦�`��gCc�t� '=Z +`��� 't r i '� i a a$ e'V i�♦a, \a? Q); ��c"♦♦ 3 Z\ \ G>S?Z\��� '��. Q\ ;t ` ;Cy �� a? Q ♦ ♦ti Y Cif *Q ♦ ` .a Qec a �Z ��r ♦ o �O a°\i r ` ;xk �r Q♦ _ „� \�S,\>..�il ��'xQ. �,au �..� \>c'� E.'s,�g'����> ♦vc� ��a. ♦�S 1r \,Q.. >y ., tkj,3a � �G'+a>:�c Y:+.. � �"�x�`.ac��"'cih'�\��"\CF a�� '�Yk 'h.�\tkk '�Z\''\U> >k F '� y� 1`♦t � a'+ ><b� ^'r a,.Ki�♦,e'�,� :� Lx '�:i�\\a@ \ ��\xsGa� x`�`b'>'Y��F�M��,.♦'iu <.. z ,..... xa♦ k fi` az„ak � �>, t4 \Z k,\ �: ti� ♦♦Ca>we, a\�+�k>, x ^' r _ c r { Y w 4 Fiscal Year,1990/91 Fund Balance;Projection Projected. FUN0 Fundss Projects bye Fund Balance_ r Available Fund r':'.6/30/91 Funds 9&11: Gas Tax 210?&2106 $355,075 ($36;OOr} $319,075 Fund 12: 1'pA Articie.3 $1,045, 26 ; 9J3,QQt)} $52,72& $0 ($67,80 EtiwadaprainFund 19: ($ AN 5} Fund 21: Beautification $6,73Ei, ?($667,Op0 8 282) Fund 22: Sysfem f7oVelopMent $2 626,1§8, ($2,80?.200} $20,998 Fund 23: General City Drainage $2236,324 ($2225000} $13�324 Fund 32: Measure! (Local.Street!.Allotment) Tetal: $6;921,881 ($7,245,405) ($323,7b4) , Notes: " Fury!15: SB 300=Clesed Fund'16: TDA Pedestrian Grant Article 3.- Specific Project Grant$ Fund 17: Federal Section 203 -Spociflc Pioject,!Grants Fund 24: <'Federal Ald Urban- Spacific Praject>Grants Fund 35: 56 140 Specific,Pcojeci Giants Fund 32: Measure'1 - Specific�ProjectGrants x, A F -i i t + ' 3\a`xc � a 'c'n`k �F '�,yo x � �" .'�z'" �'' '` :�' � w•' @ c - w\�s tiw�... °i:�.,S`�: .X`• �" ,`^` `�, .:�•• •as �\` CCq�'xyp'ia*`• �`a6a"� ''� \e x�`c1£n,.�r`xn �.`> C2`.i`>\'`' \ ",a„� ".g>. `wx "'�` .. i 'C�iC F." c ♦ .', �"'� \'','..`.:\.> sc ,. Sgrw�`•". 'Tu,'>'w,.r �'`. ,.\: x' \�k. a"..:.:`y`a,, ° '<.`s,`\.' `\• ,.y. W ,„Fj y��•v'���*��D,nv�`."w���',4` `X'^`"it Z.,rw,.�e3... �'.�>�•.x „�� •�, �� x ,b,Tb x��� x,\��`z�4 ♦ �,��;'�;". �:.03„\�`t.:x•O;a ���:. #'` `-�w,hw,,t ;>.„' >,.1„ ` .. `.� c � :"a,�^..��q>� �cur,wa-:.u �Z '�> '�.,,�3J . 2 a a '.a',,:w,� �• ""•i" a\, �'Ly �� y § F'• a.,.. \�`•""`V.. �L. , ..,,yk K` 3'wM S4• ,xa d \T. c�iw c`c`��'`�` \.�"3�y^� �i'r"q`z.,.� ac, :","a� ,`,^, 3is,�`�' •t w•\, s a' q., `"`i''`�� `a�. \3]� �� {'"i\\ �'�,ay7� �� Qt \�. c, 4 w b �.`�' Lax, '�• z. �u'ti dA �NY it��'v�'���'�',�.'"..��x"'.�b�,ba"Z\ 3,��$. �' � '?�����'� :•z:�za„�s' ."'�``".. A` 4 ���y�.nt2�?�~��\ii. Z,�Lw,k�L'e�, Rer.'�. ` ���i.`,a•� �� \ i, a,���3�'�^j. i \'\,w�..�� ^�` c`t. \``\tea r9va��F�w� '�. � a� "c�',�,•X�,` � �\,y,, ,�' > x'y: ": t uwv\x-X�},��� ���������`�.`'�x �,a\ ,, ,,, •�L xw�. a � s i ">5`,�� �i a:4 �',`'���Z\`3��� 's; a•,E 3 x�,``.�.,\���\.',\� 7 w.^ �sZ"c�`'.. � y ,\�.i", *x>, \ x `4�< �; \�s.'�.. xrca+x 3x S" x x.c\ �"`�''`♦ ���'�" a a ♦ `z�� wE`: �z . ,�V'�x�\\a1`lctK'2.`a`a.�\�S`' ,iw, �rw"J\�� �� �•a y ��.C.. .. `� `� �• c ♦\ ik��.w; �� �c. \Li'\a<�r��L•.ra,.wk">"ac`\```us„x�.,\�����`��\w\, � '"E�"i'ya.'a>. N "F.`k� ``�\ r�;a�w:;.`AL 3 �•�r @`�"" �. }a �5a\"i+��"t`,x�Z�`X,�\ t� 3.� ix ,,��,''.�\�\ ♦w - 4 "�Lr."•v Z. ���,�,��� r •,\•. ME NR IN •'�`'.NOM.y��\'�., r �.'3'3'*w23�'� .z..:\�� � ♦'�,�� LDS•'` 3��'�` . ��.��\�. 3...`� a� `sr `�a Ism' ```,Il x� uxx't>�r�l�i��i�`. ,\3F,. `'`\� `i. ��.w"`x��"k•'��,,1 '`,'c",'"�\�xar A�r::ti�: �'�.� ...�rs"\'�:.�� a,"�, .^i'3 `�YJ\S��e�O<.; a: r� *.si"'�'k�\3�\4 � ,1�: ,,i�i,`�\�.`..,�w. `R,yxayL�Y �s"�t4�z'a�>\�..,x���, t'�:•a2, \' �.r�9'n`�,�iF:rx�"" w�,`C!'\�' m �v Lv� . a�aXxzC.'� ♦ \r., k' �x� ',Xo'tc'xi.�'�e� ec`�S •�� s�' ,c: � ti \ ,. `" �... `ra\ ��;;�•� 'b4i`a .'�'�+'S a,�, :��,.•T�.4^a wi�C 3E� �%F'�.^ 'a' �Si y�•��L.\ ' ""`� �\ \ C's�,\:e`3H? x��- e:,'���aGl\•,x�'y'&'�`^\�i�'.„>.c`w`�,`:'�'ywc'£yu`\'"S3uL� ����` .`. ���„"`"���`�� \ a`¢, ^`C`r iz�`,`• Yt` `\. �, �F \ � Z� �\'\\rv� •\`• .t<"�C z•'�?'•\,'w��•'\�S>��v.,�•�\.��"1i`'`� x"t � �J����3C;��v ,t��3\"`i�,? .•s� D*e w '``�,`<,\�\ R� �\*\` �w�z ' a �`;,f'�z \'3':F;t 'fir\\nv � `��e �:.`X`"''��,,�s� y S `•:z, '���,,,'yap\as `y�`»'a,\ � t;•r�z, 17`,•„;;�� n tS: � l � �aq.��� ,'�`. £i ,� w ✓i `;w •�, s"�: q`?��••F@ s y,�c,.,*"\^wL`,�a�.�E$i4Kx'�'E.3.�, i>"����1`C�i. X�.��~��1�."a.�a� '�;� c: 't C <2�atv.a,: ,•� 'a;.y`xg`i'v',„Lai a7t,�� ,,t..�2 '\ '3�"a �\\ b 'mot`` � t., ,�a k�'h\ u*'�@'l�. \ ; ... �A�•Z•\'t.`.S.tC-F',.\fi 245 E "x` �"b, k x�a ^��'C �oz:'�'�, \ ',b �} `X��� �,'�L��!1xv AM c .�sa 1�w•k\2T,"` d \N".s r �o 0 £. LL ig �z y ca 9x ca to Y q�C �l y Ya (1 ?C LL! � fi G! G U � �y Q t G ci .. Q y rn m• emu'. m Z c , to .� U. U zgN to a' ocaaru t7 'D m�P'v m ¢c c� IM ns Z LLr a h � m U Cr'J a� 'I C� n W� � tp ¢o e W C ujco cU g U Q B I Z w LU ti V LL �p Z w %S 1m p ♦, c Cc' C*a c m Z U. lug E �o Co cn r tO :O a . ao U aN c 1 LU cn U 4 ; N n o w E- ¢c ui' -z ca a C a m w a cc'.- c' w E LL ui GA 2 E 341 0 Eia® g`Ec a � � � cm CD oala c� oi¢o y cW Zap a U. ui%:w N Im n M cw 10 ,a:n CL= C)Q u Qo c ca m o " o W cU -iCO)Q �. Q.. 00_00 O. O � C 49Lu .-� � U c o a m wo ' C E m w o O c 7 ... C J C A cm CSca 6 (M E cc W c m cY z w c spa C O Q r CD 000 N py AQ Q6. C6 C ® ® C fv 01 - CC O.'. m ZI+. Ey s LL w$ N¢ cd d N a W h N m O :q•c •w cc m V m U � ¢o 0 c c t, m e LLt c C7 ' 5 "o a C O pippp f" Q tu.. c - c c m m� C, CL Le W. O v C N. a E e �a U. O F oc a w c m a w m o00 �' esC._y F' oq a m •CCaCD CD Om � O m. zu' E � 0 a c® o c� oz mo C� O cq UO. �o C t L O V i J V O y toca a m �i as a d � m z co aSo, E E Ul oS tt R 'i ¢ CO3 .m �.`. n a Q�f c C cm_. m LL w m Q � ~ coo U cu p cm C OP C9� 09Cb co LU co00 O uj m n a� a boo 0: U. a LL Q C m O O r' i y o, c co m 5 a v > T c v o Q Q o CO e� m rn o�, a -i c V O . 69 z AMLI f` U - Q Q LL. <a 4 m c U Jl4 ...- c E m Lo to c .m 07 R&CD CD co d t tD O m n 9 p _C�C O a Z LE :V03 U. J (� O Q U Q j O Z �O CCC ., `•.1, U' C:, �r`S 3'f'°. ,3., ��A'�e�„ `� ���<Qs„i�� s 4r`.w,.;,u�� �T„b, ♦ s�.:`Za� :Q�\�?O. .�tZa4� i� a��,8"�v;1da�5.�:,f• �a'n � 3w �.s.,.?'�s�c.\�'eu�, a�a�s�:. h�.\� $�,.���'" `C'�'� •1�r♦s: % ¢ '}4"�S�>f �v ,'�•.`r`baY .�i `�J`.,,�^ ^\,<A f�k;,♦ 'c2'��erk. `} ����. '=n "n� }'-s�`��;. a �.���'`�i•� ",t':��� s .. A ^�f,Q k �k ��Kx#'3��Q,,,a"5.7.z>"�'eA.. „� ��...<�a���`��L.,z"� ��;��' kx A a� �`b�`�' v^�. ''3s°>`1`�•' \"2zt^ ,�\,,'C`tA.. `Tfii. �zZ3�h,�' ;�xYh:2>?nay ��S`'>h� �, <�' `3'�♦�d {'L�� �' \ c5c"��°�5 �` �3 �t.� x '�[�3 � •xu'��zt yY.&`@ •aY '> 3 ^�j a\�a: �. `Y$7) �ix�y��.vn \\^ �yg�u,aL�tg�}. ��� `<t: ��.�'3�Lz�;•'�� ;,��`3?>* > Mt : r..sstY^ ix@ 'c\,a. ♦ fi d>{� a�;...^ aer,f a ds{� fie`` v x '�� •� 3 �.hT `�"<�� '.��a�� � \r,. 01, maim. so MW `av,����,a���� f�� �����z.� i���e�'a� � ` v�`is `z•a � ���a`YK"�c�,n�0*'c^>'�� e\i�`2i,$\it 'n` ' .\.`3\,.��""'♦`�`,e's,x`,CzSm\`�''`�'� R�` �' >`' :��� ,C'a �..•"`q.Q ',,.� .^�\a ��C>^a'1i2e�3 � tc. \: > �d � ♦ au e,ffi� =u mix\ , u,g } 3 } .z, ya n y ���„„Svv�Z"���� �^�,\ •� n��a`, 2 .� ,�> ,f�`�\,T��£.Z�@� u' ,>u y '� �x� �„i �zz�\`t '` >�3§ � :� '!^Cw�'�♦..,•.?e' ^^ @ \ a _�\\.w'e ��\; ct ��< x4 �. � \s � `�} xx.•. ��>` fi �� �3.�'�`y`LE ,' '-e\ ``\'`�'�u'a `a3, � �4aY \ T`^x `� ) .. `>c� `'�^ T.A AZ♦\ e \?�` �< '�i a� �X� `e,• ":,4Z\' n s> Kw `S a �:z 'zL \t A� \ �Aa����a;. k���,a rx r- Asp, a: F A '^J 4.Ka"vi i`hx^3 i\�.yhZ� "`� ���C�\�a -Y`z ♦ �)«' �4. �^.�x � �. Z\ .£ \asa���< �^l,ti a\J�''`w3.„• '�.i�� •, .,U�z�t{ Y\ �� �pT� `f'` �*i,♦�`, �.�\�^. aQ.•l,�i,\ �\.�°. •'c ) ijk ��i .T��`\ '`�ya���?�. R• iCa`.,`S.♦�' ' 'a� a �` S 'V`�'ne1'�'yC��" A` 4>\\�y�,�,���.� \i`�'\< : x� �:\, .•fin: e�",. `� \� \ Zl� �a .\\: ^�ks` >'\`,if:�'Z�k^ ,t, '� �.:>.ai. ::'^ aka, .\ \x ♦r.: `,w^.'`♦�'.,- � 4C � \tet,\ \rY'.�1.\ >. 3\>� `4\. az•$T,'� \ � \ ♦\l, a+>\v, a A i`Ci♦\ c�'a: \ kZ'♦ ����� z�.. �`{�£:i� �`b♦ ��`i'�Y`�'i S�`\`�\`F♦�`ab♦ k ♦ �"�"s����'`it� \r �t>°�\a�TZC$ @og, �``a��^:TR. \. �£♦�t� �t`\:LWxr\ � c`'e ,\�♦\£sU ;��.�>�\ �.� x �1x, �.�Ys.\ ` ,i.xt'\♦�s,��3T`�'�'W3�\xzZ��a"2`��` �\;�` .s��".`�.'\>'� fi'Z\^ '�„`�,'�Y�� �`�a��^k`�k`+���''��'\ ��'4�: 'a �z �``,�p�a\'",��,�\� WC�� �'"`,�C'`,ci`vr ♦\S�,,e.f xz.^`���?���� .#��\,`\ \`. ���g".�e^"♦Z`F x,a-{.�` Z\C\3'fiq''a'\"^ ` ` �`'^fV\Zyx;'Z�sL e 2, \ zwLS t�,`♦�\'\. \x. C '� 'C i \e'�Sx♦�� `ash +� ,:�i�C�\`��s` �`z\�>��>\��?�C t`�`,C � may. �i\rc\^'f� WIN, T > xa z � �`\`� `.ie�.r�?y"��i�wy `^i \a-_< `\> 3Ci{'`Z.a aS �\\ ♦ �.�\\ \♦ � �1,,�,Z. \ \`� ♦♦ A >. y \�:\�uC \\Y�" e\�'�4'c.� � �t�y.��s'y� ��1 ) \�L` �\\�C�, 'aII\�,a�', v\ cc\'.�� �`�,i>��'a "L rr��fi��"u� � � x,t a4 � ,fi,♦.� o i\ � \L>��,ti 1 \\\ <e\� �`Z �\ ♦ \zeY;.,\` 'a♦a�'�'�k"i`Y���`�y,�z A \''\¢7�z\"'}\�'^C\..,va\��\`�>�aZ�\\i••�\ \\��i i�♦Z>�y�x\C�$�5 '�``�3, �>o- \\ < n `\.:F ��4u•\\ � �\�Z?� \�Z\_\ai�.'^� \\x\ h�a�\��,�\ha�� fii:;•�.. `C q" `ems \<u�z, �: f ;� ����'\� .\>e 4 \\ \h`�3tS.�R`a��tt♦�r.�� 3,.'y�:♦ia�\,s,,>,^\� \i`�\s� ee Y � \ '\c Z_ `\\♦ YAK#�S` e i i�y!.n L ` �\ ��'C� �" `a� ���� Yr \ \a2 `fi�ai tt�fi a c w'.�@b�♦Y\1�. \'f i'`a � �`C} \\\'\} ) \♦w"\ \\ �a�3A 1*v\ T�Z� kZ`` ♦ >"\ T� a ,� �\k'�'aS�T`����\ \�\'��a • \♦i��,��♦T£T�� •�T,\ � \ � \ Aa a�\�L ''\ 'z�^ :3 a♦ ^Z\� x�� tt'A {tx�� � ��\'\� ���"k 2 a \a`)��� '' ��\v.0 \h\\` `Zz T a\\ai � �\w' L �i ♦3^3ri\\Z�^. s,��'�\���4'DX ♦ ���'*\Cc>\Z a � t z�z` KA'z^�\` �K\a\�v♦'``\ hx A`r\�,���'k����`��k��G`�\��,��\�L\����i"`•k�e�\a S`\w^.: c s wT `^>v, x'\i\ i\T�`.��,S � v\. ., r,x a T\ 'l, �.� ^ � �a,• �Y�Sa.i.�"•'Ru`fii�� ����'��'. z✓ \ ,f �\\ C' �A\ k v e> �,�� ��,\� e z�w e i \'` is \ ' V ar < �ti� \\,�♦xC o 3 k ?�` \,��^cit\a�\`�\`e`� \£\�fiC��C\k<\y�,�) *�\��\� e♦♦a h\\ a ���a.�,�l�a�\\ -. \� a' C x\ `a u z.a s'�F � .°a• `�'`\'\>`'`\y\��.0 �.,� s 'wY.l,,> .y a \ : ?Sa 4' Qul♦ kh'���'s \` �#ti ze �f3.a 1•� \e�Zv "��c�Y � i"a`v.�aG,�_t`p"\X`ha\�,i\,e a > x -'\a ¢ t\ ♦'� n a v„Sq ,?'�� `}^, z yx�n. Z� >.e Z.\)`h'\ "ie� \ `. F�Z \.`\�` ♦ ` \� \ \\^�.\\'ik<�: s>^♦?v>ti ♦tea"`\ a t rs,�2t�\`� � ���>'�\��•v����'�y'1��`�\`\i�.\��?zY \*> St .x .,:\a H�4� \,, �><,;a♦.: ��^`. 1'+� �:F�a'���'ih::�Y����u\n},�\�� ki x�\Z$'t�4 �t,• ' �F. Fiscal Year 1989/90 Fund Sp#nce Summary FUND .� FUND BALANCE . 6/30/90 Funds 0&11,,, as Tax 2107 a 2106 • $278 431 f M Fund 12: TDA Articls'0 $371 {- Fund 19: Etlwanda?Drainage;. ($78 230) s` Fund 21:. Beautification " ($98�220 ) Fund 22: sm Syst Development $844,198 ' Fund 23: General'City"""®ralnage` $1;154,00P Fund 32:Measure 1 $p (Local Street'Ilotmant) ' t Fund Balance (Projected) Based"Upo April 6,1990 ^+ s Midyear Updated 89/90 Dapital,Improvement Budget ' Includes$406,37;Gas Tax refund required by audit.' F Notes: Fund,15: SB 30,E-Ciosed Fund 16:'',TDA Pete`strian Grant Article 3 - Specific Project Grants Fund 17. "-3deral Section 203 - Specific Project Grants ;- Fund 24; 'prat Aid Urban - Specific Project Grants Fund 3S i 01 -',,Specific Prc'ect Grants Fund 32 -..y �'t - Specific Project Grants }J ra .> .d h.� �1 `ice i 1 �` yk t SM a. z -AGEN 1977 f � 1. �#REDNESa y., MAY 23;,�?Ca9t1" 7 "d0 P.M. i;• LI!)NS Pl4RK CQilUImITV CENTER 9161 BASELINE c'. Fa,4N H0.�'UCAl+GHGA,'CALIFORNIA _ " I. Pledge of AllegiFance} I I. R61I•Ca11: ` Cortznissioner Chit ea- Colnissioner 7olsi:oy' . Commissicner McNiel CommTss�orer` Weidberger ; •, Con�nisgianer Melcher ` IIY. Annd me�ent; IV. Approval •of Kinutes �`. Adjourned. M4et*,ng pf March 24, '1990 Adjourned-Meeting•of'May 19 0. �- Muy.9, .i39p t. Consent Calendar, '` The he Consent Calendar itersrts are. e:cpea:ed to•-be routine;arnd.nan-controversial. They, i a t be actk3d'on by the " ca►anission... at ones ini without discussion.:•; 1 f tcrVne: has concern over'any''iten, .`t shouId"Ire' r=ved for,discasston. A. TIME EXTid'SION FOR CONDITIONAL SE PE12F5IT 88 13; ,CR4i0 MC. The-develo ent of°a five?stocti +ofifice��b i di,d •.h y, u g �- F totaling, 74,697 -square feet-m approximately 2 <acres�o� land in the Industrial Park Distkctu'_Sjjbarea.�6 of tha � `Industrial Specifii: Plan, and tVq. iavenalAvenue Overlay . district, located r>at" the southeast ­.o,rher --of ,Haven Avenue=and.Arro�r Rcn"te.- APN:.. 209-142-16, t B, .'TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13316 - FRIEDMAN HOMES = A total residential. development:of, 121,single' family 1'6ts on 64-5 acres of land in the .Vary• Law, Residential District: (less than ':dwelIi6g units: w acre) located at the' northeast- "corner.` of Archibald , Avenue and- Carrari Avenue APN: 201-071-14, 37, and 45. C. :-TIME. EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13674 MIGHTY DEVELOPMENT - ';A residential subdivision consisting of 18 single family lots on 11.29 acres of land in the• Very ! Low Residential District (less.than 2 dwelling -mils .per i ' acrel located on, the west side of Amethyst Street north of Valley View Drive APN: 1061401434 VI. Punic Hearings The, foilo fng item are public hearings in vAich.�coiicernsd ind vf_duals may'%;vrsice; their opinion of.' the' '`related,. profec PIevR uuft to be recognized by the 'Ctatis:tare and sddress tfie 'Comnission by stating yourr.noma and• address: A11! such opirt(ons-- shaiC ba limited, to 5 mfitutes, per, indiv :itial fpr each pro�eot..Piease siip2 in.af ter"speaking. . �= U, EN'JIRQRHENTAI:ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-09'- `INLANDAREA FELLOWSHIP:- A" request' to_establi h a day, care facility within, an .e�iisting, �;boilding previously approved fo.r church use totaling', 16;457. square, feet on 2.42' acres ,or land in". the Medium Residential District (B-14 dwelling units` per,: acre), located° at the northwest: corner of 19th-.Street and Amethyst Avenue - ;APN: , 20I`-474-02 and- 03, : .(£ontfnued from Apri'1 25,'1990 :. E, `ENVIRONMENTAL ': ASSESSMENS AND CONDITIONAL' USE PERMIT 90-07 - RANCHO HILLS ]MINISTRY CENTER A ,request" to establish a 4,320 square foot church office and.=me;ating. na11 "for church-related gatherings .'in. an ex industrial park ':in,'the„General ;Industrial District, Subarea 3 of the;.-Industrial Specific -Plan, .located at 9390-7th Street; Suite.0 - APN: 209-171=57, -.(Continued from April 25,:1990. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ' ASSES'MENT AND =CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 90-10 JOAN H'. .ACHUFF SOUTHWEST TRAINING CONSULTANTS;; request to 'establish a driver tral.ning ,'School in 'a leased.'space.'of 3,312 square feet within an. existing business. park on,5.7 acres of �la'fi&,in 'theolildustrial '',Park District, Subarea 7 of the: Industrial• Spesific Plan, located'at'the northeast comer of Arrow Route'and, tihite 03k.gvenue - APN: 208-352-414 'f 5 Y + j 4 yfi J jf' G.",-,VARIANCE 90-04 H b S DEVELOPMENT The request to , exceed the building envelope established by the Hillside V. Grading O,dinance' on, 13a lots .within a ::36-1ot;,detl'h.; review application in the' Very.'.ow'Re'sidential Dis.trict:' (]ess; than 2 dwelling units per:acre) locaietl .west o' . Be.yI Street and north . of .` Almond Street - �APN: .. 1061-$0 -3; 5 through=9, 14 1182')9, 21 `through,. f, '26,, and Zg through 32 and; i061-811,-1 through 3,, 8° through,11 -18; through 21,, 23 through'25 and 27 througti 29. Associated 'with; this application is;Desiqrt RevieWsa` ' for Tentative Tract 11626. r " H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC'iPLAN', ., 90a01 ;C . Y OF - RANCHO ,CUCAMONGA, n amendment to the, Etiwadda .Specific Planpertaining *o, the, prop4teo removal of existing Eoea]yptu5 r�i.ndrows.as a result oil the aIfgnment of: Suit Avenue west of Etiwanda •Al'" ue a'nd other street-alignments. y.• f" I,.. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 'AND GENERAL PLAN " AMENDMENT 90-OIB - !!I SSIyDALMAU ARCHITECTS =- request to ,amend,:, the. General Plan, Land •Use.Map,,from Office:to. .Medium'' Residential .8- 4 "dwelling units, per, acre)„ for .L 56;, acres of land located. at the southeast; corner of` Archibald Avenue.and `Chur'ch'Street:: The::City wi11 also consider Neighborhood Commercial and: Low `Med'iutr, fw Residential :'as alternative designations 1PN: 3b77=332-Zf. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT . ' `AMENDMENT 90=02 = PITASS O N U ARCHITECTS '.!..-A;request, to amend the ~a0evelgpment ...District,, .Map. fronE "QF" (Office/Professional) to "M" :(Medium, Res'idbntial, 8-14 dwelling units`-per acre)' for 3.56 acres. of land"located, at 'the,southeast, corner of Archibald Avenue,;and ChurCh i Street. The Viy will also consider,"NV,(Neighborhood Commercial) and "LN"" (LO Medllin , Residential). as. , alternative designations- APN .r.iU77-332-26. K. ENVIROF�MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL 4SE 'PE " IT' . 90-13 - NEDI-RIDE ,INC.' A request' to establish a maintenance and ,vehicle:_ storage facility in. a', leased' space of 5,780 square feet within. the existing 8iane, Winery complex on 6;7 ,aC"es ofland­'in. the';General Industrial District„ Subarea .5.. of the 'Industrial' .. Specific Plan, located at 10013 8th ''street APN:,; 209-201-19 and 20. VII ,Old,Busine" q' L. MEDIAN `OPENING POLICY - A .rev is oh,to, the Planning, ��. Commis6ion Miedian Opeping Policy based or City Council , di.�»actizon. rr_ ;,,' YIII; ,►Vew Baasiness j M, DESIGN `REVIEVi FOR _TEENTATIVE TRACT 11626 - .H & DEVEPMENT LO - The des! n reviewreview,�`If,building elevations and detailed , site plan for,>sfi Pots.;of.: a previously . approve--, map consisting of 82 singe-fami' y lots on 86:53' acres.;of •land in the` Very. Low Residential 0istric't (less j han 2 dv�ellang units,',per acres located:: west of Beryl fStree't .and north of Airrond •Street HPN: .1061-801s3, 5 through 9., 14 18, 19, 21 through' 26, and. 29, through'- 32- And 10fi1>811-1 th.,rougt� 3, ;8 through 11, 16;thraugh 21, 23 throvgft anu 27 through 29. Associa'ced ;with-this application is Jariance 90-04, . N. TREE'REMOVAL.PERMIT 90-04 - LUTTRULL - A6 appeal;ef the:. Planning Division s .dec decision, require replacement of-a- tree'which'was removed without a permit.;at 6168 Yopoz Street':- APN: lOfi2-351-37. 0. :SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION 90-45 SIGNS ANU SERVICES GOK71ANY - An appeal :of •.the `City Planners denial'or the design of a proposed monument sign located at 9041, Pittsburgh Avenue AWN: 229-262-14. IX. Director's heparts P. USE DETERMINATION 90-03 - �AKUBIAK - A request for Planning Commission s.. confirmation of staff's use interpretation involoving Nfuntz Stereo, 8269 Foothill Boulevard.. I Q. " PRESENTATION OF ENGINEERING'S PROPOSED'` 1990 91 SAND 1991192, CAPITAL"IFPROVEMENT BUDGETS Qral-Report . A., Cmission.ilusiness R. VICTORIA GARDENS SUBCOMM.ITTlc'APPOINTMENT'- XI. Pub It Coents This is the tirra? and piece, for the gensral public to`address . the C'annission'. Items to be discussed here are those which. do not already appear on`this agenda. `III�. '�3aurnaaetat` -. .f The Planning' .., C`aftwlssion has adopted. -Adrokstrative ; Regulations; that set:an,,11:G0 P.M. adJourrerent tip: Xf. > itern3 go b'syond that time, they:'shati 'be heard only with.the consent of 'the Carmisston. , t �1k r. a t N MAP ICINITY : CMAO tv CMLGU ° ail as® m�M m0 lgm 0 a. as �. b -1 WTI q A 18 Cau tv a ;.� e Ia6r®')rrferlrigtlA4 ar'.�, �' r, �1 a MY UF RANCHO CUCAMi NGA STAFF REPORT . k r �m. DATE; May 23, 1990 TO:. Chairman, and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner r SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-86-13 CRHO INC. - The development of a five or office buildinj totaling '74,697. square feet ar approximately ?:acres.of land in the Industrial'' Park D;strict, Subarea 6`04, the Industrial Specific Plan, and the Haven Avenue Overlay District,- located at the southeast corner,of Haven Avenue and Arrow:Route,>- APN: ' '209-142-16. I. BACKGROUND: This project was original'ly'approved..by the Planning Commission on June 22,.1988. Plans have bean submitted to the City. for plan check; howel:r, no ,permits• have been issued. The Building and Safety Divisior-:-approved an extension of the plan check period to September 6, 1989. However, no plans were re-submitted prior to the Extended plan.check expiration. Since the plan ch•^,ck; period has expired, new plans will have to be re-submitted and plan check fees_paid again. The two-year- approval, for Conditional Use Permit 88-13 will, expire on June 22, 1990. .Correspondingly, the applicants are requesting a Time Extension to allow time 6 submit plans o Building & Safety Divisiion for plan check approval and the issuance of building, permits wit„sr the office market conditions improve. � The applicant batieves that the project may be di!layed up to two,years. The Planning Commission may grant up trt three years of. extension, in twelve-month increments. II. ANALYSIS: The project is consistent with. the Industrial Specific PlanPlan and the General Plan. The project will not,be..detrimental`ito.' the adjacent properties or cause significant enviror.,merit&l . impacts. The proposed site plan and building design, ogether'with, ., the previously recommended conditions, are in compliance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and City;Standards. t PLANNING' COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION FOR CUP 88-13 CRHO,' dNC. may 23, 1990, Page"2 w 111. RECOMMENDATION. Staff vecommerd i.nat the Ptk)nning Cainmissi cn. approve the time Extension for Conditiinal Use Perm?t,86- 3 for,one. yeas. Respectfully §ubmitted, - 71 �J ra Sul-1 r City Planner '�'y`' q' BB:BAJjfs i j Attachments; Exhibit-"A" - Letter, nt Exhibi::t Locatioji Exhibit "C" - Master Exhibit "D`'"-'Site Plan; Exhibit "E" Lower Level' Parking Exhibit "F" - 'Building Elevations Exhibit "C" - Section and Perspective Exhibit'!'N" - Landscape Plan Resolution, a,. Resolution`of,Appro,vai for Time Ex�ensionc �j i� C R H • rJ _RECE1Vd0_ - ::T1POF RA' i0 Q� Merrf r;.;_,•-a.,�•� of d(dPl1Ts1"T1tUtQH1P' 195 South C Street.Sve 200 ® (� Post ofteBosloss _ A� A�+i"R3,.����68 N� S'ustin,Caldornia 92681-1066 714.832.1834 April- 17, 1990 - Mr. Bruce Abbott Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga; 9320 Baseline Road Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 9.029 Re: C.U.P. Number'86-13 ' Haven Corporate Center Haven and Arrow Rancho Cucamonga; California Dear Bruce: I would like to request: an extension on the above mentioned conditional use permits I believe the current, expiration date is June 22, 1990. If you have any a_uestions, please give me a call. Sincerely yours. CRHO Architectst Inc. a Godwin C.C. Mr-. Don Rosenthal RGlmv UF ITEM:2=947'0, YOAr --� ANCH CIRCA ON TITLES PLANNING DIVISION EXH1. SCALE: Masi u�mr�.,AM 1 ! �;! ! ! !11 a (t tt --� l `T r .. 0 .CITY OF ITEM: -17AVAn RANCHO. CUCA ONGA TITLE: -- ,PL�ANNING I]IVI�ION � �, EXHIBIT:...:ScAL { z T UTITITIT �.- f lit-- {l--14 NIM CeTy OF, RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: f-':� � r� PLANNTIG ,DIVISION �' ' lEz' sCA E: A. i �y }r • '-' .. ice` �t •�!1. yyrr�� ':� is `I — Si.}''' E � i re �i .r + � sN t s ,Y f P ti T. }t £'� { t�/`T'r �t,�l^ /��"�;,..���+��:�3�Y �,4�CT�����j *„StShs7^• „�S°�rQ��y�+��3, r: �4v WA �� vpt ® • 'Ai.. t tx`s' ' ...... .. ...�-.. .....,... ��.,Tom',- 4>a S �,11� 4 �tT"'itiftl i ,zY n ,y �r-4ipj}+:l�if�•~:�1/E=ds��ii�#'�^x�t�,..�5' ,�,4,�� Y .i { RESOLUTION WO. ea-127 A RESOLUTIONd OF'THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING-CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-13 FOR L A "FIVE STORY OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST.CORNER OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND HAVEN -AVENUE IN THE HAVEN AVENUE > . OVERLAY DISTPICT APN: '209-142-16 A. 'Recitals. (i) CRHO, Inca has filed an application for the.issuanee of the Conditional Use Permit No. 88413 at described in the titi.e Of,-:this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application'". (ii) On the 22nd of June, 1988 the Planning Cocoission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a 'duly notl6t public hearing on the application and cdneluded`said hearing on that date., (III) A11 legal prerequisites to the adoption, of' this Resolution have xcurred. B. ,Resolution. NOW, `niERErORE, it is hereby found, determined cAd resolved by the Planning Comissiun of the City of Rancho Cucamnga as,fellowt: 1. ' This Commission hereby,specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A„of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence:presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 22, 1998, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: + (a) The application applies ,to property located at the southeast cornier of Haven Avenue:and Arrola Route with a street frontage of approximately 300 feat and lot depth of approximately 300 feet; and (b) The property to the north I of the subsect"site is a retail center, the property to the south of that site is vacant, the property tag<the east is vacant, and the property to the west is vacant; and (c) The property has Mature trees; and (d) The propertY e f is suitable or office levelopUlint .and is within the Haven avenue Ovkir7ay District which encourages off-ice development. 3. Based upon tho substantial evidence presented to this Comm,tsion during the above-referenced public hearing and u@on the specific findings of facts set forth in paragrapfi. 1 and 2 above, this ;.O aU Ssion hereby. finds and concludes as follo�rs: PLANNING COMISSIG 'SOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE' PEM&108-13 - CRFiO June 22, 1988 Page 2 (a) That the proposed use f in accord r�ith..thsn' General''Plan. the objectives of the,.oevelopss@nt Code, and tho purposes;of the distri'ct. in wPo;cPo the,9.ite-is'locate-d. (b) That the proposed use, together with ,the ` . conditions applicable thereto,, will not"'be Atrimenical' to the oubllc health, safety; or. A?are,' or Materially injurious to.:properties or improvemp, is in the vicin:#;ty. `Y (c) Twat the:,proposed use complies with each of the applicable pr.'ovisions of the'Develo6�aent:Code: (d) That the site and building design. sat9sgy the, design, criteria for the Haven Avenue'GrePlay District." 4. This Comiission hereby finds. and cortifies that the project has been reviewed and considered �;n`cocpliance with' the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, ,fur00,.th,.s ;Coaadission horcbj% issues a Negative Declaration, a S. Based upon th@.findings and conclusions set forth in ps�ragraph 1, 2 and '3 above,, this Coairaission,hereby' approves the application, ibject ;to y each and every condition set .forth :bolaar and in :the .attached` Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by 'thls reference:` Planning Division (1) The ingress/egress lane to the -lour parking ;area Shall be expanded tc'.three lanes 'for a<total,of of 40 feet. (2) planter fingers,'. with WO trees each, .shall be ,provided within the parking lot at 'i -znds of parking rora . (3) Additional pedestrien space,and landscaping.shal be provided at,ground lbvel adjacent to the building on the south aad east :ides of the. building ,by . recessing the glazing enough to accamodate a pedestrian colonade. (4) The positi6n . of , the'. trash ens9osure shall be adjusted to provide for better trash bin access and naneuv@ring;, PLANNING COMMISSIO` SOLUTION NO.CONDITIONAL U;iE PE ..T 88-13 , CRHi9 June 22, 1988.., {s Page 3; (5). Canopy trees, shall be provided within the deck parking area and plaza areas." (6) ryA1T ,trees ..'for the- project shall b.- box-sized spei.i'nens. (7) landscaping 'at the southeast �;,."er of the, parking deckL stial l take,'sight lines into consi deration. (8) A report by a_quali,fled arborist shall he: submittei prior, -tb issuance - of " grading- and/or, building permitsn, and 'prior<to tree removal, vhich'.ad&6ites the feasibility of relocation, of_tfia existing trees devhIn't� planter areas to be created. by the new development. (9). Those .trues"which tKd "arborist de'�mss' suitable for relocation shall be 'relocated accsrdinyty. Ref ocated trees shall be _G's.early indicated on 'he Landscape1Plans for the development project, (SO) Those trees which the arborist determines:cannot'be relocated: shag" be replaced "`with 'the largest nursery-grown trees available as: determined'by the Plaimer. The ' tyre, `size, 'and location ;of eplacement trees shall be-noted' an the Landscape Plans `to'be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior, to issuance of building -" permits.. . , Engineering:Division (1) Construct the portion- Of,thi^main drive aisle for" ' Oeveloprjent Review. 88-04 ,adjacent to tfie east property line, including the drive.approac6 on Arrow,Route. The drive aisle design shall be,vapproved by. the City Engineer., An :,off-site t:onstruction easement.shall be obtained,from the property oe +er to the east prior to issuance.of building :persnits (2). A contribution aid of.,�onst'ruction for,the median island aitHin Haven Avenue shall be :paid td,the City. prior to the issuance of building per�ii?ts. ?Re` amount of the fee shall be the City a;bpted"uni," amount, far Phase It ($55) times the linear feet=<oz°= propertyrfronti8g on Haven Avenue {317 feed, per Resolution No. 8May. , PLUMING C"ISSIL. 'SOLMtY N NO.. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-13 - CRHO June 22, 1288 page 4 ' (3} The Developer, shall p,,v reimmbursment fdes, per City Council,Aesolution No, 86-328 executed ;by the uaon Corporation for the construction of improvements an Arrow Route;: prior to the issuance of .building pprrnits. (4) Woven.Avenue shall be widened-to provide a right- yarn'lane for,northbound traffic turning eastbound 4tg.Arrov Route. Construct the entire deceleration lane south --of the, south property Fine.- The er Develop may request a' refmbursement agreement to recover the ;casts Of constfuctiAg the"deceleration .. lane from the�'propgriy Owner ,to the ;south 'upon dev�Snpsnt. The existing traffic signal .at the intersection of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route sha11 be modified and upgraded as approved by the City ,� Traffi€ Engineer. Overhead Utilities Undergroupding ' (a) Arrow Route - the existing overheade:utilities e ecosun eati"ons and electrical) on the project side of Arran Route shall be undergrounded from the first pole an the "t side of Haven Avenue to the first"pole east of the project east boundary ;prior to public improvement acceptance' or Occupancy, whichever occurs first. The Developer may request reimbursement agreements to recover I one-half the .City adopted cost for underggrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it accurs . on the opposite side of the street.' (b) Haven Avenue - the existing overhead utilities 9n' a pro eat side of ,Haven Avenue shall be f undergrounded as fo11c°;sa priori to public improv nt acceptance or occupancy;, whichever, occurs first: i. (1) Cca unication line for the 66KV fro* the first pole on the north side of Arrow E. : Route to the first pole south of the prOJect south boundary; and ' Q) Electrical line fr=the first pole on: the north side of Arrow Route to in of-site pole approximately 96 -feet north of the" south property Sine thence, { . p P yacross Haven Avenue to ,the first pole on the west, side of Haven Avenue. PLANiNING ComissIk , ESOLUTION N0. CONDITIONAL USE PE iq 88-13 - CRHO June 22, 1988 Page, 5 (3) The Developer may request a rei�sbursesaent agreeaent to recover one-half : the difference between the undergrounding'cost of utilities (electrical. ,. and. 66KV com0inicattion line) on,the pr®Ject side of Haven Avenue minus those (telecommunications and electrical) ors the opposite;side `of the street from future development as it occu,s on., the opposite side 0, the street. (6) The drive aisle.ilong the south property line `shall be constructed full 'ildtiu. An off-site:copstrssction easement shall be obtained from ,the proVrty 'owner to the south prior to 'the issuance ,of building Permits. (7) °Nz. Stopping at Anytime` zones shall be installed on all Haven Avenue and Arrow,:Route frontages. (8) The Developer shall pay reicabursement fits;' •for const7uction of street improvements and/or Utilities undergrounding'on this site by.ottars, prior to the issuance of building per�its. (9) The entrance to the lower.level of the parking structure shall bt,a minims of-40 feet wide. (10) Limited Use Areas shall be designated on' the Detailed, Ierlgaticn and. Landscaper Flans where lines of sight for vehic as entering the perimeter, drive aisles cross` landscape areas. Landscaping within the rLImited Use Areas shall be restricted as follows: (a1Y The maximu;i allowable height for mmture ground cover shall b3 six (61 inches' (b) Trees shall be selected such that the leaf'zeass is a minimum of six (6) feet above the ground both at the time of planting and at maturity and (c) Tree trunks shall be located outside of .the , Limited Use Areas. (11) top signs shall be placed on all four legs of the tnterseetion between the two slain drive? aisles. The following items shall be shown on the,final Detailed Site Flan; PLAHfdIN& C AESSEG. sSOUmoN NO. CONDIT%OaiAL,USE PERMIT-08-13 = CRHO June;22I9@& Page`6` fa),: Ye11ow RPM on our foot centers extending north from: the intersectjon,. to the aisle aiedian•and south avid east from .:the , In t�ion as approved by the Ci�tg Erigiviecr,,.and (b) Stop signs and stop. bars on all four `. approaches. S. The Deputy Secretary this C90missicri shall. %'ertify to +he adoption of this Resdution. APPROVED r1RID ADOPTED tHIS 22ND DAY OF j6NE, 196B. PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAWHO CUCBtRONC.A ;. i BY: r ATTEST• K ra d e u y ire ry I,. Brad Buller, 9eputy eCretary,of they Pianaijng Coissi`or� of the City;:of Rancho C!ieamgnga, do hereby certify, that the foregoing Resolution+gas duly and regulariy, introduc�d9 passed, aid adapted by the Planning CQ* an .of -the City of: Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular n€eeting,of the Piapning Cl aiJsinn held on the 22nd day of June, 19SA, by the fol'.Ioe�ing'yate-.to-Wt: - AYES: C ISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY `BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCtiIEL NOES: COMSSIJNERSo ABSENT:.. C ISSIONERS: NOSE t-, a 1 S RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE-.PLANNING COMMISSION "'OF THE CITY OF . .RANCHO' .CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, `APPROVING' THE TIME A`_ EXTENSION 'FOR CONDITIONAL IUSE PERMIT NO 88-13 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF' A FIVE-STORY OFFICE ' BUILDING OU.' THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE:AND 'ARROW'ROUTE IN IRS 'INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, SUBAREA 6' OF THE. INDUSTRIAC. SPECIFIC PL0, AND THE HAVE, AVENUE OVERLAY..DISTRICT; AND 'MAKING FINDINGS IN'SUPPORT THEREOF- APIV: 209-142-16'. WHEREAS; A request has been. ,filed fcir..a Time Extension far the above-described,project,:pursuant to Sec' on .IOtt. r' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally ( appravea, the above-described .industri al' project.. SECTION 1: . The 'Rancho Cucamonga< Planning Commission has 'made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic .cond'i.tions have, caused ':a�•' �t distressed market climate for development`af, the project.. B. That current economic, marketing,~' and' inventory conditions make it 'urreasonable� 'to develop`. the prefect at this time. C. That strict enforcement•;of the Conditions-of Ap6r`oval regarding 'expirations -would not be' sonsistent With the intent of the Development ,ode. O. That the granting of said Time:Extension will not` be detrimental to' the public health, safety, or wnl fare or materially injurious to properties''or imp»;`4 ents in the vicinity. SECTION''2: The, Rancho C c;j�wonga Planning Crmmission- hereby grants a,-, Time Exterisiorl, For: p ect Applicant Expi'ratiov t CUP 88-13 CRHO Architects June 22, 19g1 r, r+a PLANNING, COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TIME EXTENSION FOR CUP'88-13 - CRHO, INC. May 23, ;1990 Page 2 ; APPROVED AND ADOPTED,THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY, IQ90. PLANNING CORMISSIP.. CF THE CITY.OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. BY: r Larry T. MCNier, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bui1er-,'�Secr`—etarw I,. Brad Buller, Secretary ,of.'the Planning Comiaissiori of the G ty�,Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that, the -foregoing ,Resol'utioR was d`u1y' and regularly; introduced, passdd, .and. .adopted by the Planning :Corimssion'of tide City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular mpeting'of the Planning Commission d' on: the 23rd day of May,<199tl, ;by the folGing vote-to-wit'., AYES: COMMISSIONERS:• NOES: COM1"!ISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: f AR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG STAFF REPORT .r k DATE: May 23, 1990. TO: Chairman and Members of the .Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett.Horner, .Associate: Planner. SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13316 - FRIhMAN HOMES - A total residential development of 123, sing .,S5 family lots on 84.5 acres.of land in the Very: Low. Residential -District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre)` 'located at ,the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Carrari Avenue - APN: 201-071-14. 37`fi 45. I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13316 was approved by the Planning Commission on March 25, 1987. ` The project-was appealed to: the -'City Council meeting of May 6, 1987, where it 'was approved`with slight modifications. On; February 14 1989, the applicant, Friedman Homes, 'requested and received approval ;'!or a one-year* t ' extension on the Tentative Map in`order to all&t ahem additional ei time to record the Final Map. Tonight's application. represents the second ,one-year T; Extension request.. According to the Development Code (Section 17.02100), extensions on approvals may tn grat,ted in 12-month increments, not to exceed 'a total of 5 years from the original 'date of approval. _ II. ANALYSIS: A. General.: Staff has analyzed..tba,jlro�ppoosed Time Extension;and has comparei the' proposal witt the current development criteria outlined in the levelopment Code. !Based upon this review, staff determined hat th®.;p_roject meets the Basic Standards -for the Very Lo►t Residential District (lets 'than=, 2`dwelling units per acre).i B. Hillside Development Ordinance: The project site has natural slopes greater than 8 percent, which would make the project subject to the newly adopted Hillside DevelerAent, Ordinance. The Ordinance. would require substantial modifications to the grading plan and house, designs in order for the project to meet, current Hillside Development Standards. Examples of no'n-conformities include building envelopes and conventional padded ``terrace" style grading of tots. w 1 1,� n . ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION;'STAFF REPORT TT 13316 - FRIEDMAN HONES May 23, 1990 Page 2, AM However,`it was not staff's intent to apply the provisions, of the Hillside Development Ordinance to residential projects s which were already approved through the Design Review process prior tw the effective date of the Ordinance (March 8 1990). Application of the Ordinance would cause undue hardship to the applicant who has invested a great deal of time and resources toward a project approvai. Therefore, ' staff would_recommend gran tin the Time Extension re Best. Staff notes, hot�VW, that,if the project is-leve oped with a new and different product type, the Hillside :Development Standards would apply. C. Grading 'Plan Issue: The final grading plans 'have not yet been.approved. It appears, however, from previous plan check reviews that the final grading plan ;may differ substantially from the conceptual grading,plan originally approved by tite Commission and City Council., If the applicant cannot bring the final plans into substantial conformance' with the approved conceptual plan, then the grading 'plan will need to return to the Commission for, review and approval as a modification to, the project,approval. In fact, the rough grading plan has already returned once to the Design Review Committee, at which time several revisi�ns were 'recommended in order, to bring the plan back into conformance, with the original approval. However, U-11, is a separate issue from the Time Extension request. if necessary, the grading modifications will be reviewed by the Commission independent of the time extension. II1. RECOMMENOATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a one-year Time Extension for Tentative Tract 13316 through adoption of' the,attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, t rk Brad Bulner City Planner BB:BH:mlg Attachments Exhibit "A' - Time Extension Request Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit "Ca - Site Plan Exhibit "0." - Building Elevations Resolution No. 81-38 Resolution No. 87=242 Time Extension Resolution of Approval. 1s .r r AprLl 17; 1990 Planning' Commmssion City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 8007 i Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re-: Tentative Tract 13316 Dear Mr. Chairman and Members of the-Planning' Commission, u Persuant to Article 2, Chapter 3 of the SubAivision Map:Act. we hereby request an extension of Tentative Tract Map 13316, I have been working with Staff and our consultants- to cozplete all outstanding plan check and Design Review comments on this- AM pro3ect. We anticipate having these complete with plans ready for signature within the next 30 days. Cindy Hackett and Brett Horner have been most helpful in prow dingy, direction that has allowed me to bring` this ma p to a point ghere it is ready to y v be scheduled for City Council approval for recordation subJ.ect`to Posting of bonds and payment of the necessary fees. As stated, T_ would anticipate that occuring within the next month. Thank You for your consideration of this request. R „Mn 5; u11Y, ev n Ford Lice President SF:bw cc: Brett Horner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Cindy Iiackett, City of Rancho Cucamonga t I ii5 JERSEY BLVD. --. RANCHO CUCAikAONGA,CALIFORNIA 91730 1714) 987-0455 .. YAP+�S&.w76.b�^'. '�� �''�" �� ��:.....�• �.d fat SECI5 �~ TI N,R 7 µ; � `]='Mf/724 O rr~ PM88lCsl62, "•, a+ ;• t. 2 I7.0 .et t ro..a.. t! 4 _.O O2 AC tvl ,M 7 t �3axt un1;. + •p++t . +`00 Mt v Or .3r[R Eqd .,ens C3HT. hts I r 9P tC j6AC GNL •+ y _ .w �.. ..t a[i.cwi �•' # VoAT FdrP { ::• f�' r j :er.ae n a'._.. 1. eN�� �� y ARt �•• a �R � �,va � Att na[at r i &vt , 'a •• e• r Ie` •' a Ir . .yyr�+� a M- :a TR. I a ditA �6 w � 1.�•. • e. I .� 0 .e r4 ry � rt11t_ ~' � O 3 T ' ' '�r' 1t I I I NORTH C M TITLE. �„ . + EXHIBIT. 3itAF r.: . +-' met f e� a ds — .a • .iro �= S'�sy !g3 t �,.., r' yg AL '� Pp` see 1f 3 •A � � ,\ `� CAIWARrS HORT MY. ANC tJ TITLE� SITE PLM � ; S f M I e11iH. i,��ii��'w�� ii. te�,'•.,t�1/�l'�r},r' .� ct{ A ,�/� vi tti 1 •■.,la flsvu�l� r�fu• C(v{' ile, �,,.Y,�i ' 1, fl ,i'7Y�S'ii,i,d vll 1�'i c �• } � 1141l Rl ,I�lal'cl 1 x 1��I,J.�jri real ���r �:�0i� ��■o��r � � ��, � :_ ,yam �f •a��r,� r u>L.R t ti •i 1 �,> h�` y t ,iixtl■ iy � �� �} s �•���, I � ���la�'lrl�l_7.ill tlSt�l.r� �m �,^+i,' y tM■11sri a h�fi9l�i�f sk n rJJ15tAt�AJ,���iv RESOLUTION NO. 8738 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMISSION OF 'THE .CITY 'OF . RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CALIFORNIA, .CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT H&o NO. 13316. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Aap No. 13316 hereina ter "Map" submitted by Friedman Homes, applicant, for the. subdividing the reap property, situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,', County of`-San Bernardino; State of 'California, described as a: residential subdivision of""844 acres of land into 123 single family lots located at;the northeasi corner:of Archibald Avenue and . Carrara Avenue IAPN:' 201-071-14, 37 and 45), regularly 'came before -the Planning Commission far public hearing and action on march 25 1987; and WHEREAS, the City-Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineeriug. mod Planning Division's. reports; and , WHEREAS, the Pla•i`ning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence. presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the "City ,of.: Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as, follows: T SECTION 1: The Planning Commissic.n makes the'Following findings in regard to en 3 ve-Tract No. 13316 and the Map thereof: (a) The ,tentative tract is consistent with the :General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans- (b) The design,-or improvements'of the tentative tract is consistent with tlba General Plan Development Code, and specific plans; (c) . The sate is`physilr cally suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) the design of`the subdivision is not likely to cause. substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat;'. (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public,health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not cohfl i act with any easement acqui red by the public at large, now of record, for, access through or use of tile• property within the proposed subdivision. (g) 'That this, project will, not create`adverse impacts an the environment' • and a Negative "Declaration is issuede r` 6 ` ( Y PLANNYFE6 COAfi4ISSI0dl RESUl.UT3off ENO. ' TENT:TYVE -1tAC7 W. 13316, March 25, 1987 Page,2 t SEGTYON' 2 Tentative l'rm�t,.Flap Ni 13316,.:a copy :of:,mhich is attached ereto,. s :h'ereby approved subject to alt of,the following ,conditions j and the attached Standard Conditions. PLANNING ,r2TISION' l` 1. No st;.^'cures shall be permitted. W thim 106L feet of the 4 north property'line, of Pots 44 51, 58 and:59.. 2. The: unit on Lot` 59 shall be'relocated'12 feet to the.- north, if, feasible as determined by , the :Building; Official. 3, A decorative ,ix foot high slnpstone bl'oek wall add landscaping,.sh'�kll be 'required,`along : he south property line of Lots "! t rough .8. . The:_location and design shall be shorn, on ;the.landscape plan.which shall be,revi�ed and approved'by .the City Planner priorto issuance of buiading permits. Landscaping shall i�iclude periodic ` placement of -plant }material that will provide, view corridors to the`north, - �- 4. A six foot` high si umpst"e bl ock,wall shal T b6t POW red along the West,arid".north .side'.of Lot `59 and along tttp: north.side'of.Lot;60. 5. Perimeter fencing ,shalll : be required along Archibald Avenue and the`south;si`de,of Almond-Street -The location and design shall -be shown on the' landscape plan. Which shall be reviewed..and approved_by 'the City Planner prior to the issuance'af 5uildig Permits. 6. Carrari Street improvements shall be competed prior to the issuance of any occupancy permits, 7. At the time of final grading plan,review, those downhill loth with significant:rear yard slopes, as determined by. the Building Official and' the.- City- Planner, shall incorporate,the use of greater'-grade splits tfi:e. ,higher stem waltsl, to reduce the !amount 'of .grading to' ?the satisfaction .of the , Building Official and the, City Planner. Lots' 30, 32,''339 34, 35,,. 37, 56, 57, 58, 59,and 60`thal l Ole single story units. r'- fff 2 t-• tt1 .. 1 1l" f PLStdttlNG C014ISSIOw`Rk50LUTY0N N0; v TENTATIVE TRACT tt, •10. 13316 IWarch, 2'5, 1987 nge 3 4 9. The CC & R's `°shal l recui re that all buildings,' structures, yards and other iaaprovement:t shall be maintained by each property owner. in a manneir which does not detract from the appearance of the immediate neighborho*d. 10. The existing Oak tree..on, Lot 44 shall be pr0sprved and protected ,as •required' by Municipal Code`' Section 19.08 i10. ',The teen shall be enclosed by an appropriate constrktioe barrier, such as chain link fence,.'°prior to the 1ssuoce Of'any grading or building.permit and. prior . to coaaena.nIent of work. n 11. The applien,lt shall apply for r'wievr'"and.approval 'of'a Tree R2mova,, permit prier to. reaaoval of, the existing Eucalyptus t;,,ees in the vicini.ty of Ldts 65, 67, and 68. 1 The,,t1'e�as. shall be replaced per.�Municipil :Code Section 7,9..O;t:aL10. :.,. 12. The debrisy'basin :outside slopes and-;thQ inside -'topes " above the h'dgh water 'mark ,sha11 be: landscaped land irrigated to the 'satisfaction 'of the City,'Planner.:and City Engineer. 13. An additional five (5) foot landscape easement shal'I be required along the south side of Lots 1 8 ENGINEERING OT.VISI%1 1. The debris basin and the enti re,`storm drain system.shall be constructed to the,satisfaction otthe City, Engineer. 2. Al driveWays shalt be designed t® prAlvent `Vehicle, contact with Toad surface 'as approved by"',the Building Official and City Engineer. 3. Lots 9 and 10 shall contain a Flood protJJction wall 'or ether overflow protection device to the„satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Ailmond Street shall he-constructe'd with a grin a 26'feet ' pavement within a 40 foot wide d4di'cated' :right-of-way from the easterly property lint toa,Wermosa Avenue..< The developer shall be"eligible to enter into•a1reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of permanent inprov nts , from future development adjacent to this portion 'af Almond. 5. Street grades greater than 12 percent .shall_be subjezt.to final approval of the City Engineer. 1:, mnmixtrwma44iun RLWLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT W 13316 March 25, 1987 Page 4 6. The vacation of the Chestnut 'offer of dedication" shall be completed prior, t� occupancy permits or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer.: 7. The proposed debris basin shall be dedicated to the City in fee or as otherwise approved by, the City-Engi.neer. 3. Overhead Utilities: a.. Archibald Avenue - The existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on :the proicict side of Archibald Avenue shall be undergroanded from the first pole on the south side of Carrari Street to the' first pole south of the north tract boundary i'. prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs firs,:: - Reimbursement-of,one-half the adopt-d cost 'of undergrounding free future development as it occurs On the opposite of the street is ,not feasible, because "the property is presently developed.. b Almond Street - An in-a,ieu fee as'centribution'to the future undergrounding of the Lexisting overhead utilities (teleccmunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Almond St reet shall be .paid to the City prior to occupancy or final inspection, whichever occurs last. The fee 'shall be one-half the adopted unit amount times the length ro'ect frontage. 9 of the p � ,. I' APPRO'+EO AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1987 PLAN ING E;CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: �. av ar erg b rnsan ATTEST--j6_ 4&O"� a . u er, epu y ecre�ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City' of Rancho Cucamonga, do,hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly;and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning e6imissi`on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the'Planning Commission held on the`25th day of March, 1987, by the following vote-to-Wit AYES: COW4ISSIONERS: MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, BARKER, CHITIEA, EMERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS; NOwE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: t!VIE 1 I RESCLLJMON NO. 87-242 Ask A' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF,TH3`Ct-,,Y OF RANCHO 'CJCAHDWA. 1.=—IPOR=. lMDDI1e' M ,PLAxHnry ODMaSSION RESOLUTION NO.. 87-36 QONDLTIONALLl, �I APPROVSHEREOPNG TENTATIVE TRTRAMN0. 13116 AND DES ;N`REpIL+U i! T . �j WHEREAS. Tentative Tract ma A map, 13116;, hereinafter "Map, submitti0d by txieddan Hemeuo apRbicmnt. for the purp®ce oF-subdividing the real groga\rr;. situated in.the Cit7 of Rancho Cucamonga.' Countp 'of San:B®ryaardino. ,StatcLof,' . �:alifornia. described as a:eaaidenti'i,subdivision of 223 lots on 84. �=?_ ® of land located at the northeast cornis of Archibald Avenigt ard' Carrara Street (APNt 201-07i-14..37'm acid 45J ,cams before°.the City Wuneil 'AiEer_public hearing and action on'lup $,` 1987;;and 61HEItEAS. the Planning�Commission has reaxfsmend>ad approval 'of ithe 'map subject' to all, conditions, 'Aar. Earth £n the Efteineering :•and Planning Divisional reporta; .and WHIREASS. the City Council has read and consi&ted the planning Cow'sission and the Engiuseiing'and Planning Divisior.0 rePor -considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NMI THERETORE; B8,IT RESOLVED by the'City Cotmcil. of the City of Rancho Cucamonp. Cslifornia. doe® modify Plaftni.9 Coaeaission `,Resolution No. 87-38 by changing Condition Noes. :, and 13 snd-adding,ConditL*n . Noes. 14 sad S 30 read as foiscwas 3. A six,fac,t high decorative block wall shell be required, along the .. � south si� of Lots"I through a. Tho(call Snail be located-at the top of the slope within the landscape and*wall ;easa�aent. 14.e design and location of that waf ®hall be rel4imed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuanft-of.building permits. 13.:" A tw*1ve foot landscape and-211 easeaent shall be requirad along the south project boundary of Lots i through '8 in addition,to the dedication required for the Comauasit�; eq�str att trail. 14. .A local equestrian trails` a ainifatmf of ton fast in widthe,shall be required along the south side of Lota 1 through 8. north of landscape and wall easeaent. a 15. The CC au Reg shell prohibit alterations to the block mall on `the south aide of Lots throw 8 unless prior written authorization h obt`ined frame the-':lity. 1 r f3 Rcisolution No. 87'24. t f Page 2 i YASSEA,:"AP8ft0VED, and 'ADPTSD.-his 6th.day of Ks, 1987 AYES: Brown, Stout, King. fir,= h NOES: None. � ABSMT: Btn"t r Dennis 8... Stoux..t�po�. �„I A L MST: =1� Beverly A.1 Authelet,CfIF G1erk '- %, BE9EIMY A. A17TBE1.BT, C8T? CLDix>d� the Citty ,o# Rsnehe G.rNoss;,, California. do hesalsg oartifp that -the i'ormaaing 2'eelutionvi dubp pa®aed, .. approved, and adopted the, City tliu::c�l:os the<City o4,'�neho..t se California. at m,rogular mRetinB 64nh 6th aay o$of sai u eota ` Executed this 6th dap of Posy, 1987 at Rancho:Cuc,�onRa, California. Beverly AufCh�tst Cite Geri: �Y ;i v _ t ° s y RESOLUTION NO. AMA A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF IdE Clr OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, Cr—. FORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13316, AND DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF, ,. AND MAKING, FINDINGS IN SUPPOtT THEREOF '. , APN: 201-071-14, 37 AND 45 - A. Recitals. (i) Friedman 0GN!S has filed an applicatiorr for the .Time Extension o',' Tentative Tract No. 13s.5 as described 'in the title of thft. Rewlution. Hereinafter iii this Resolution, the subject Time Extension•1,69 uest s referrQ4- to as °tk„application," • NO On March 25, 1987, . this Com ission adopted its Resolution No. 87-38, thereby approving, subject to specific cordirions and time limits", Tentative Tract No, 13316., (ii ) On May' 6, 1987, the r:ity ` Council ;adopted its Resolution n;o. 87-2429 thereby modifying spedif it' conditions of the Planning Commission approval 0 Tentative Tract 13316. (iv) Oil' April 24, 1989 the Planning Commission adopted its Resoiutior No. 89-5z, thereby approving a -one-year time extension :for Tentative Tact 13316, r (v) Al Legal prerequisites prior to the adopt pn of this Resolution ` hav-' occurred. B.. Res�ui�,ion.` NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined,'and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho_Cucamonga as,follows, I. This Commissi4r.'hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of'this Resolution ore Prue and correct. 2. i3ased upon substantial evidence presented to this y Commission; including written and oral staff' reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as'follows: (a) The previously approved Tentative Map is in sut:stantiai compliance vfith the C ty's current General' Piaii, Specific Plans,.Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies; and (b) The extension of the Tentative Map will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current Genet Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances} Pans, Code, alnd Policies; and 8W,° .; PLANNING 6MMISSInN RESOLUTION Nt3. TT 13316 - FRIEOAAN HOMES �.. May 23, 1990 Page 2 N' (c) The extensi!?a of the Tentative Map is not likely to,cause public, health and safety probiems;_and (d) The extension is Nit►iin the time Timits,rrescribed by State law and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and;, 2_.above,_this Commission hereby grants a,Time Extension for: Tract Applicant Expiratioy `' 13316 Friedman'Homes !'iay 6, 1091 4. The Secretary .to this Commission shall -certify to the adoption "of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RQ t?AY..OF MAY, 1990, PLANNING COMMISSION W THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Larry T. McNeil, Cha I rmait— ATTEST: ' Brad Buller, Secretary �t 1, Brad Bullev, Secretary of the Planning ComMission'of the City of Rancho' Cucamonga, do hereby certify,-that the foregoing Resolution was dui?Wand, regularly introduced, `passed; and ad(rpted by the Plan0ne Commission,` the City of Rancho Cucamonga, atA regular meeting of the Cfanning-Commiss uvi�held on the 23rd day of May, 1990, by the'followin'g vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS". r May 21,r 1990 Mr. lack Lam City Manager City Of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 9a-telinR Road Rancho Cucamonga$ CA 71730 Res Tentative Tract 13316 Dear Jack, l have spoked with the Mayor` and Severalother memebars of City Council thesub Covent tc th;. 5-16-9p City Council meeting, Alt that meson '..ng 5„24_q 9 the Cauncil contau,ed approval of Our"Map to its meeting+ The Corancil members I have spoken with assure was to allow time to either acquaint t emc me 'heir action familiarity with the Project and t;ie. h zvlvesa or renew their conscrltants and our staff have spent'.orcrcatw solutions to h } Staff, our the d�'YP1opf4tpnt challonges o:f thiS pro ecod tingerinq � p o.iaet. Additighpil 1 ha re s.., crd the' vwithothe information en with Russ theyrand other Staff ah'd +iedman quiee ��mes to preps-,� a comprehensive Y qurEted ,of .:Omfortable that any Qupe a'co he staff report. I feel answered by their, vr'tiOns t Counc'i1 may hav@ w11 be Staff report and that map to hWilloject receive'Jit{SOr rvaew 'of the 29, 1990. approval an May Due to the significant on approval of this fit'�ncial impact an ,.eur company dependent the time of map and the timing Of the C4isneil;'s actEoh, at pending ektension of the Ten Ma advised to state oar position '"for tfs�e record, A+ wo; have been Ch has prepared a letter for us whiff"r; ;cu will receive, DcSkow 11?53 JERSEY BLVD. " + RANCHO CUCAFdQNCA,G4tIFL!RNIA 9173Q t71�7 9d7-Q955 1, Jack L�sn; May 21, 199 Page 'Z Jack, I haveq worked very Bard with 5tafif c%rzr the' last, few month+, to brig this plap to the point whare it CGuld ba, apprcyed ,rnngistent with grad engineering, princip es .and the `gaglg of the City and Friedman Homes to c:-date a flzgshi special site, of wat R proiect on this 1�7a�'tt�ef' .e. hh Ct�dlic t"s pcc ,» atSo cin °s 9-9r , Staff should aclta�sfi + �} >ag>Commxssxt►rf at xts* 'S 2 -°4a mae>te no Im,apcot� f ►ti3on r+ ardnq hh ,4exts + o:�_.rtho Please contact me if you Or-any member of tha staff ar`Cauncil require anything further frc.7 our company to Conclude- th465 matter. Thank you for your help and cnnsidnration. Re c'flatly, ven Fo Vice PresIderRt SFsbw i 1 t: h CITY 1"OF P.ANGIi1O CUCAl�? .I A . s`, G r • S "F REPORT T DATE Mr, y 23`, I990 TO: Chairman and Mambo of,the Planning ,Commission , FRO"9: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steven Ross, Ass isilinL Planner SUBJECT: TIME • EXTENS!Gy .:FOR 'TENTATIVE TRACT 13614 MIGHTY DEVELOPMENT,-'R residentia't subdivision consisting-.of 18 Ingle:gamily lots;en t7.29 acres .of land in the very Lo:v Residential District (less than 2 dweiTing unt"ts !.per acre) 1�,ited on' the., west side of AmethyG'=:Street, north-of Valley View:,Drive - RSN: 1061-401-03. I. BACY;ROUND: %native Tract 13674 was conditionally approved by t z Planning Commission on May 25, '1988. Oi April ?^y, 1990, the applicant, Mighty'. Development, requested an, exten`sinr:of the Tentative Mpp in order to allow them additional time to record the Final Map. The State Map Act, .Section 66452.6, allows for up ,to 36 mnnt s of extension. Extensions may be granted in 12-month ' increwents. II, ANALYj : Staff has analyzed the prraosed Time. Extension request and has compared the proposal with current de-ielopment criteria outiined in the Development Core. 'Base(i-upon `this review, staff . has determined t;:at -the. 'prefect meets tfi(z Basic Standards ,;for development in the fiery Low Resident al District., (less than dwelling units, par acre): Staff Is'`eurF,ently processing a Desig� Review application for the house Platt.i n9 Ei aticns, and grading for this tract. Condition p10 requires that this Design Review be completed before recordation. xII. FACTS FOR FIND The Commission must make all of the foilcwIng findings in order to approve this application A. There hale been no significant changes in the Land ilse Element of the General Plan, Development' Code, or character of the area within which the Project is located, that would cause the approved project tobecome inconsistent or non-conforwing. B. The granting of an extension ;:houid not be detrimental,.+o the public healxh, safety, Gri welfare o-,-mate.ia21y injuribus"to ; praperties or improvements in the vicinilt,),. AOL ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT r' . ..MIKE-EXTENSION FOR TT 13674 May 23, 1 90 Page, 2 IV. RECOMMENDATION: Sta- recommends that.-the Planning ammission approve .a 'one(1) year time eXte�ns'ic0 for Tentative Tract 136i4 through 'adooidn of tf attached gi I' 'ion. • Res c ully tted, Br e ;City anner a. BB:SR/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" 4etter fror� p antl' Exhibit "=J" -a'icinity Nao Exhibit "C"'=- ,Subdivision Aap Resolutim No. 88.4 Time: Extension'Resolut�on. of Approval wo 7, l` h � f I. ` t I( k«r f, a7 , 1 i •� r f,. } 7 ti w! u 4— MIGHTY Mwelaprnen ,:n t Inc. • re �a)9a4.8 s1 t R t x` f 9229 Ut co Att nue, 0126, : Fax:(714)944-1325 Rancho Cucamonga,C''A 911.30 rr a my OF WiCE:G CLtC1 MOUG, sIAN141W 4W'0`' April 20, 1990 �- APR 20 990 j 74 ? Steven Ross Planning Department_ ' City of Rancho CI�C,_. nnga , 9320 Bassline Rd7. Rai cho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 RE:, Tentative Tract pia Y 13674- Dear ;Mr. Rosa;: our tentative map will expire May 25, 1990: The ;�Final map going ''through the dui ign review and,engineering department's plan _ check. Our project has b-an d'jlayed by the recen+_.implemcntation of. the new Hillside Ordinance;; wa therefore request ea .one-year 'exten- sion. Thank you. Sincerely, Chiang- ang, President ' mighty Development Inc., General., Partner OF RANCHOONCM - TY I'I 'R a.act PLAN1gTY1oTG DIVIaI+E31rT aCFPIBTI': A SCALE: - w 11111 �4 '' ti 1 ��i���3P �, � �� ■11 _ NMI � �olllnl Illnlrl A Pam►,�• f :! If� �, 5 .1i nPIH!ltik�t2 ro �' 111A1 IIIAtrr' t'IHI Ilt■ 5 ^ to®ee�u'ruYNrf f�a IPINi H 1N IAWAL'�^ � `® IIII Alll - .31�4. nm moo ti. _'1_fr • �T fl11n11f11'1C S + �e A -- .����t-�HINI, .� = f■esle�� 111 w ■o a eulp eiiin IIIIII ti�� NlleesllRle S n1AI}� � rN11/s�s��►�X. - s� N! �N;fit ®■1®® �a t°°°°tAF'" 'w _ AIGa� �d� �rrosar�� � . �_� ►" /►��. �_ "' �11��i���s N �. �^a�r^r�^^r�..r/a0 w lre C C{=' �f1e 0 `�r..r�� lr•a .�� M ^r N I/ `�tl■ ,�„ %111111 ^�0000� .IIn1IW:�f\w 1 a� !1 1 nl � !��+ � .i■r f0111 ►A ` \4i� '�\IIIq���Hn►u®Chan ■ ee►i.u■Ntf®ris►4� .ifaYvr�ij } r1nN Nr^!►A■r �,to►. ��IHn1Ay�O�®I/ 1rt'ilu 6el1 r� M�C�nl fIJ .,�^.en (�►�ri _ Ib; ►1IYP ;� ^CC C►'o Ili d►I r � � rq��S en=?I �—^.�.�� ■• / ^�1� �./Teel�.�� C r^ .:./ G ri 7i 1�^^ S pe C Ip.^ tills�CNI�1 � IIIIg11 ��r �"" .•,1 rc7�, „ . i ..:�®il= w:1111H11 ■�.a urn■ .�• t�� rig+rrrrr to:..a C tt►\�IIAII.r.eee Ce�n.mw:► ■u■. un. '4 n tinu■■ - 11: ....n..Nw.n nm...-.`-Iil:C:.::::1\ . •,�Y: OIIIIII �- .1 � --� :.`■P n 4�•:-.�.`�`i,.l ..r. o =s■■.■us..u.srsrltttfn..,.— .» .,..,. ::� '�:':. : _-::::: R ::"' :..:I>,'�+ ■r■r ■■. • 1 -tour J/ t. i.� .. a ..• .• .. •...n ■.L■■p - ■n C --- == - ..:. ..............r........... -an. P� � Iln 11�III Ii11it,:x rn.■•. .ra _'a \\IIII Itlltit■Ilr 1 ' T I � � ��'\ in aW_�=As MAR-1 _ 11 zz ®iS +'' of a! ,-. �x+a • ..rr r ti. r 1 ��-spy lIIIIiA- N.pi ..: 1 • EXHIBrr 1 WAP— as it • `w ' c �. � 'a'u".�•wa 3N�; 'y „�. }. :1141L'✓i, .,� r. Ba_ s »ram I C JI } i/ �0'-7•'`t r. o ,e a .� t sw . r u.•- ,�wa._ j1�J t,`-Y.�{ ?•,\ '�•�•*dn;r Marv» _ w:r u.r'i, .w..r++a`� •' y 7r`.. ^ T_-^ter-p•^' - uws AM ::�T '� �p�•}''( r a /f aAy sa .�psio aPA: `-atsM+I^'�. j}" •r, �` ♦♦r aJ ` i B ,,. it ..1Iz "t 9• /f1��\ t•� \I�t`\� t{ o^� +.rur •,.sow \` ..c+ f : �, 10 sft��u 1. '`;I{°3��'"t ,�Y •. rr„ 'd ,yoa..rw,}� 1l.a�'w�+ -� /� \� '. c:. f' / t7� /t�' t •P� t� '� 9' \ ` a/��p � -.�`s 1 ���.r.*matYr �..��. i W�� t - Gi •. a - Nti so 7 1 a: . ' b'1 r-t�.:'�:�..~^�'�...�...et ' �I?:• (:1.1 � �. c I� lv.�i., t. .� T[pPGTcx T11ACT JO.t70Ti •,11IiiI IIRS IRf r it tin r MCA, w.•tn.oa�.aaw a�e.��c+.:.a stwaonsotp--a asV,*43 .yw.�mua.•. }I �n •ri..Jr•Wa'vrav�' •.,�1pbN799 M��m. v•/.care tr.-..ouart.. 'alm4amn ew if,^A ITEM �1 OF RANCHO CUC-,T"ONGA TITIwE. '' a PLANNING DrIVISION s.{Him ! sOALE: f RESOLUTION NO. 88-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COOMIS,;ION OF THE CITY OF ' RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE'TRACT MAP NO.,13674 ` LOCATED WEST'.OF AMETHYST STREET, NORTH OF VALLEY VIEW dti THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL. (LESS 'THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) DISTRICT A. Recitals. (i) Ler.� Development has fiied. an application For the,approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13674 as.-,,described in the 'title.of this Resolution. . Hereinafter in this:` Resoluti- r, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is.v referred to as "the applications`.` (ii) I On the 25th of May 1988 the Planning Cormnir;ipn of the'City of Rancho Cucamongaconducted, 6 duly, noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.. (iii) All Iegal ,,prere4uisites to the adoption have occurred. of this Resolution 7 g. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby..found. determined and 'resoly'ed by the Plenring CorrAission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as foilowZ: 1. This Commission hereby spec+fically finds that all 'Of. the facts. set forth in the ,Recitals, Pac�ti A, of thi? Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence preseited to-this Co fss on during the aboye•rsferenced public hearing on May 25, 11988, including viritten and anal staff'"reports, together with ib'iic testimon , this .Commissiont hereby specifically finds as,:follow s: p+ y ('a) The application applies to property located at West side i of Amethyst, North of Vallby Yew depth of 858.33 fc3t and is unimproved;presently t and tags of'6fifi feet and lot' (b) The property tO'L•he n6l'th of the subje t site 'SL vacant and designated for flood control purposes, the property to the soUti and ;east of that site consists of existing single family residences and is designated for Very LOW Residential (Less than 2 dwelling units per acre)_; and {c) The proposed subdivision design and accom.p.myiflg,maps ,have been reviewed ;by the Technical and :Gradi.ng Committees and approved `subject to the conditions contained within this resolution; and (d) That'th0 proposed bdivision has minimum' and average lot, �r sizes of ,20,070, and_13,072, square feet tonal ent• with requirements 6f',the Ver . Low'Den sity Residential,,District';:ands t �� PLAwNING COMMISSIGja`RESOLUTION N0." ' TT13574 . LENK May 25. 1988' j Page 2 (e) The related ssriance; application Vari"once 87 14:"5as bean reviewed and apNroved by the'Planb , ing commission, and That there is adequate space abaaS�h]e fop all lots ,for �. equestrian use. 3. Based upon the substagtial evidence presented to thislCot"Mssi,on F during the above-referenced; publid hearing.aod upon the specific findings�,of farts set forth in paragraph. I and' 2 above. this Commissioereby fintls ant' concludes as follows:, „ That. ten tati Ye tract i s cgnsi slant tsi th~ the: �. General x plan, „development Code, and specific plans.; and (b) The design or-;"improveR rtts`af,.the vtentative J tvaet is consistent °with the: general Plan, Development Code,.;""and speci.#ic "plans, and .Z,.. (c) The site is physica`�. sui.#able--1W the ty b of developornt p'roaoseda`„`and, (d) the desf§nl of the subdi Its ion"is not 19e1y ;o cad;� " sabstant al ` gnvirgrreiental damage and- avoidable injury., to` humans;. and �dldtife or 1 their hbitat, and ` (e) The tVtatise tract is not likely" to cause serious public.heaith°problemsg and ` (f) The" design of the tentati� tract will not confliet with any ea"sement acquired by the, public, at tarye,; now 'of record, ;for. access ' through 'or :us•? .of' the:"property Within the Proposed subdivision. Q. This CMnsmissioa hereby finds<,and eeVflfies t;At 'the pro3ect has been reviener and ci►nSidered in compliance with the Califofaia.'Environmee�tal Quality Act of 1970 and, further,:. this CCMft ion~Hereby ;i;ssues a. NQgaLi.us Declaration. Based upon the findings and-cunc1vSi4ns set forth' in paragraph. I, 2 and s above. this Coreanission hereby'approdes the application S4, j6ci to each and evc �� condif;ign let', forth 5eloar and in ;the attached' standard C:inditions attaeheei hereto a�td fncgcporated herein by ttis reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIOR RU.,_.. TT13574 - LECiK May 95. 1988 Page 3 Tentative Tract. (1) Final'landscaping an irrigation plans for. the parkway aldog.`iimethyst Street' anC%.And for, interior, street planting shall be submitted for review:and approval bit then City: Planner 'and,City. nginaer prior to" recordation°of.the Final:Tract;Ma0. . (2) An in fee As d'agtrtbutioh, to ts4 future undergrouneing .on tfie"`exist ing overhead' ytilties " (telecommunication and electrical) on the.oppa I . side of Amethysti.;Street shal;� ke'"pa.id.to ;the 'City prior, to ,appro.val` of the Final A40 .`'.The -fee shall .f rn be one.-hall f. he City_,adopted uniti amount Lfimes the, leny«h.of the project frontage. (3) An eq'ues,tri an trail 'plan shall be nrovi ded indicating'widths, maximuns ;-,topes,;fencing and. weed controls i -' accordance` Vith" city; equestr9ari : ail ' standard:tlraaingSF which 'shall :s`ubmitteI ;for .. review and approval' prior to, secordat�'on`"of. the Final'L Tract, ;Map,. and prior 'to. 'apprava1, of• street . impraveinent and grading plans and.-shall include' the ,following: a) Drainage. from_thei north sha]7 be 'carried when~ the equestrian.trail 'easement in an:,i,„proved b) Equestrian traits pith 'steep grades require' installation of perm;onent devices (I'e. bur-ried s, curbs br treated timber).' c} Pemenent crossings to Olow,access`fro tail";, to gear garde will be required. The c�ssssngs shall .�nclua2 wood bridges•, concrete pipes. concrete. box or ether acceptable design.' d} Gate, should be, provided,for each 1pt to,alleu access to local =t.ail5s a) e) Two iz�--Il peeler "logs•;fencing •shout"d be. used, _. f i►'.1terid ,,f split eaiI. geacing', for ;laca1;; trail a. `Fencing shoujd Vie?, Eocated en`` t`e inside of trails only.,, iF :iF elf PLANNIPIG COE9liISSE0rI.RESOLU[IOtI NO. TT13674 r LENK May 25, 1988 page, d (5) On/site drainage.to be directed, westerly from,',ae. site ,s,hall be disposed as follows in order of ,:reference as approved the City 'Engineer; Building ;:Official and=San Bernardino Flood Control District where appropriate; a) Directed southerly through the vacant- 'lot adjacent to the south west 'corner of the site within .an easement i�,Valley.View Street, b) Directly` westerly within the San -Bernardino County Flood Control District property out let�ing into Np?lman Nvenv�z..o.r >c) Oft 4ctly' westerly within the -Sapp Bernardino County Rood Control District property- out- , letting into the existing earth channel serving as an autflow'.from demens basin. (6) Trail and• lot drainage existing at the .south 'west corner shall be,zonveyee to either; a) The south through ai private easement` to a t_iint of discharge ,to a public facility by a. service improver_nts maintained by Homedpiners Aszociatian or; ' b) The west to the channel in wy surface improvement .. and maintained", 'by = agreement.: exer.uted with the County. In, either, case, absolute ' protection of southerly properties, wTr..r be'-provided., with charm.s, berms, walls or other acceptable de>Aaes as determined in Plin,:Chac% based upon th`e Q 100 ?scha�rge. (7) The p I vate d i;e shall be curved northerly within parcel 15 as much as`, - ssible to minimize height of fill slopes. (3) P'aint`nance of , neces"ry of off•site drainage ?acilities and the. private drive. (lot` A) shall be included mli hin the projects CCIR1,1. err (gJF SIdualka shall be installed nr, at leash-one site of , the private drive. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLDTIUd NO. TT13674 - LENK May'25, 1988 Page 5 (10) Prior:to recordation, a total development package, inclLidiag plot plans, elevations and grading shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee and shall also include public notification of thj same: Design Review (1) All lot grading whether in C-OnSunction with- a total design review application or individual'custom lhts, shall utilize grading techniques°which hinimiae the alteration to the natural landform. These techniques should include minimal padding for units only, split level. foundations, 'and/or stem "wall construction (2) All trails and parkway landscape improvements shall be constructed and improved at the time of street construction. - (3) Detai`ss of the decorative masonry wall adJacent to Amethyst Street shah be. included in the final , landscape and irrigation plan. (4) Texturixed .paving shall be provided ,at the drive entrys outside of the public right-of-pay. (5) Al side and rear elevations of any pk•a eiiCe+� buildings shall be upgraded with architectuval detailing. (6) All cross-lot drainage shall be eliminated by the , use of berms and swa#es on the lot or origin. (7) All required drainage devices shall be improved to the extent 'required based an hydrology and i►ydrolics { supplied in Plan Check. (8)', Additional grading of .front yards to eliminate rrainage pockets will be required and .the extent.of .;uch grading shall be determined in Plan Check. (9) No surface drainage will be allowed to cross-the Community Trail'or other public improvements. (10) A5 much on-.site drainage as possik:l shall, bA directed to Amethyst Street;. (11) She location and design of any permiter fence/wall shall be reviewed and approved by the Design ReviewCOMMi tree. �f PLANNING'COPHISS103 RESOLUTION .NO.. TT23674 - LENK May 25, 1586; Page 6 (12) A .min mun unit size of 2a6a.saui,,re,, feet. shall be requi rev l 6. !' The Deputy, Secretary to thin` `Cort nij"§ion shall certify.to 'the adoption of ibis xescriuti(�n. AFPROVEtl ANR ADOPTED THIS 2�TH PA MAY, . PLANNING CG 7014 OF.THE CITY OF RANCHO. CUCMORNGA arty' 1. ' l45 'I ATTEST': ra Q' ep ecretary I. Brad' Buller, Deputy Secretary of tk -Planning Comm ssto:►�,gf the Cityl kf Rancho Cucammonga', do hereby certify that tine foregoing R� �.'�' on eaas_.du"lp and ^� re{,ularly - roduced,, passed,,,and,adopted by the .Planni-I ,tiommission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, .at a regular meeting of the P''.,,tolnq Commission held on the;25th day of May, 1985, Jy the folia�li,ng vote=`o-kite AYES: GHITIEA T&STOYst BLAKESLzY,:EtiEf�IGK, MCNYEL r �/7 NOES: COMrssIONERSt. NONE n ABSENT. COMISSIONERS.• NONE 7 1,1 f I r � _ ;F , S RESOLUTION NO. ' A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF , RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION r FOR. TEN 'ATIY.E' TRACT NO. 13674z, ANU 'MAKING •FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1061-401-03` z 1 A. Recitals. (i) Mighty Development has-filed an application for the extension of Tentative Tract No. 13674 as 4escri.bed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred, to a_ ""he application.", (ii) On May 25, 1988, ;this Commission adopted its Resolution No. y 88-104 thereby approving, subject Zo specific conditions and time:'limi s, Tentative Tract No. 13674. i•ii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, k B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is R'creby found; determined, and resoly, §;V the' Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:` 1. - This Commission hereby specifically 'finds that`al1 of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this rResolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evid6nce presented to this Commission, including ,written and oral'•,staFf reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:. (a) The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial ` compliance with the City`s current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes, and Policies; and (b) The extension of the Tentative Map :will 'not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes, and Policies; and (c) The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause public health-or safety problems; and. (d) The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in,paragraphs n 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby ,grants a Time Extension for:";a f + 4 ;r= V �•'� Lie .�y e y a PLAWNS COMMISSION RESOLOTICN No TIME EXTENSION FOR' TT ,13674 ; May 23, 1996 Page 2 Tract Applicant Expiration 13674 Mighty Oeve.9pment May,25, 1941 4. The Secretary tri this LCommis's'ion shalt Certifyto; the ado ntion- of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DI:Y'OF MAY, 1990' PLANNING £OMMISSION "; THE CITY OF R4tiCHQ CUC:AMONGA . BY: Larry T. McNiel Chairman ATTEST: Arad Buller, ;Secr9tary I, Brad Buller, Secretary.of,the_Planning ;Commission' of the City. Cucamo.s., ,,,^f Rancho. do hereby certify that the foregoing "esolution wa5f;dujy and regularly introduced, passed,:'and adopted by the` Plannimv" Commission- of, C City of Rancho Cucamonga, at,a. regular meeting of the.Planning CorpissJ64 held on 'the 23rd day of May, 1990, by the foT;lowi,ng vote-to_wit: i AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: \` ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS 1 'MY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIv`GA 9 DATE: May 23, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the. Planning Commission FROM: Brmd'Buller, City Planner BY Steve Hayes, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COND TIGMAL BE P£RMiT 00-09 INLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP A request to establish a', lay care facilitywith inan existing building previously approved foi, church` use, totn0 ing 16,457 square feet on 2.42 acres of land in the Hadium Residential. District (8- 14 dwelling; units per acre), located at the northwest - corner of 19th Street and Amethyst Avenue 4 APN: 201-474-02 and 03. (Pelated file: wp 89-17.) (Continutd from April 25, 1990.) ' r I. BACKGR(IUHD: On April 25, 1990. the Planning Commission considered the above referenr.,id' agenda item and continued the project to this meeting at the applicant's request. The primary concern of the Planning Commission was the location ..ane,: separatiorf of the secondary play area from the building;"tha%. is, children *u,n.ild have to cross an on-site drive aisle to rear`. the secondary May area. The PUnniaa Commission granted the continuange request to allow the applicant to work with the Planni; bivisiin to provide a combined .rea r,r outdoor day care activities, preferably one that will not'pose- any s;ifety problems for tha children. As per the Commission's request, staff met with the applicant on May 1, 1990 to determine the area in which outdoor activities should be located. exhibits "A - C" of this report indicate the areas in which fhu s A icant and staff determined thre,,, possible, daces a 7,500 s: ^re foot, play area could be located without completely redesigning the approved sits plan, given, the site constraints as listed in the analysis section of this report, 11. ANALYSTS: ,r; A. Sfte Constraints: In designing a continuous '7,500 square '.Soli:. outdoor pplay area, the follov/irg constraints limi", the area," In which this can be accompli!ih ,A: ! 1. The, FO ldimi. exists in its preset location; IAlld ITEM 0 c� o PLANPkIN0 COMMISSION STAFF REPORT.; '`CUP 90-09— INLAND, AREA FELLOWSHIP' -May 23, 1990. Page 2 2. The driveway entrances are constructed in accordance with the driveway policies of the City Engiaeering: 'givi'sion and/or Caltrans, there pre, cannot be moved 3.. Existfne mature trees, many of which were recommended. to remain' rn place (per the arborist's report for,Conditional Use Permit 89-17,,. 4. 'Residential development exists to the north and west of the site; 5. For safety purposes,>a deep setback fs needed fora play area fn a corner lot situation; 6. The historic Significance of the building `should not be degraded by the placement and style of the play equipment selected for-the outloor play,area.: B. Play Area Options: With these cctstra nts in mind, staff has highlighted three potential. locations for the,'outdoor play area (see Exhibits All "C°). The foii'owing breakdown highlights the advantages and const:gints that affet area: _each 1. Area One - (south and east pf Vhe existing building [xhibit A.major advantage of locat,inq the Alay area in this location is the preiearvation 0 6.11 healthy existing trees in place. The' rote of California `Fan Palms north of the drive aisle should 'not be impacted by the play area. Also, mature pine, 'trees Within,this area will be`preserved and provide shade,for the children. Another' advantage' is the large buffer zone between this play area and the existing residential development to the north and, west. At its closest point, this play area is approximately 150 feet from' the senior project to the north. Furthermore, the existing building acts as a buffer to further shield "noise from the residential development. This area adjoins the building and would not require children to cross a drive aisle. However, id :should be noted that State licensing regulatinns requt"re full: time supervision for preschool children at:a minimum ratio of 1 staff person per 12 chi'ldren.. Children -would not be allowed, :to—walk un'suprrvfsed�across a parting l,ot. The PLANNMG CO PtMISSION..STAFF REPORT CUP 9049 - TNLAND; '1 FELLOWSHIP May 23, 1990 Pnge 3 Planning Commission, in raisin this issue, may recall 'conditi the Montessorf school oning provide a`",safe and `convenient access "to the outdoor play area The 'circumstance's were quite dir`rerenfi in that instance. Firstly, the school was for prescjwzI-;an& elementary age chil6en. Elementary age children_ a yalk to 'khooi grsupervi6ed; Whereas* preschool children rust,' be,accomparied by an-.'adul't. Secondly, inIthat. situation,' the 'Commission �was.'cc�ncerried 4ith:-'children walking to. the ' school from :Foothill'rBoulevard and crossing the parking lot. Thirdly,` the school was located`Jn a :cemmerc,ial shopping 'center"where f_requent.,traffic through the parking lot could be.;expected, The close` proximity of Area One to Amethyst Avenue (30 feet to the face of the curb) "and .I9th. Street .40:-feet ( acts as a major'-disadvantage, '..to 1odati"ng( -outde !, activi.ties in'this location. Only a wroujhit"ii^on fence i's " proposed to pro? t the children from...vehicles. and � . pedestrians passing the site,'., In order. to secure 7,500" square feet ,of play area, Area One, as:shown, would require the loss or 'relocation of ix (:l) parking spaces._ Even#hough the site is over-parked by eleven (11) stalls (per, the square footage .of. he sanctuary area versus the approved site plan for Conditional Use Permr�t 89-17),"sta:ff. would _recotranend. 'that the' six deleted spaces be replaced oh-site for potential'_ overflow'purposes': A potential "ex sts to.,relocate 'the'six spaces on the north' side, of,the north drive aisle between the palms required to be preserved-in place. Finally, placing the p�dy area in front of the east side. of the building could detract from the ` historic significance of the building. To;mitigate this concern,. ' staff has added a condition: to the attached Resolution to review the'equipment 'and design of the ,play area "through " the Design Review process., This .condition was; added:in order to avoid the ;use of.modern, garish play'equiprcent'•' and to allow facilities that are more.,sensitive to.,the historic nature of the old school house. 2. Area Te - (north of' the 'existing building, along the south side of'the north drive aisle The proximity of the play area to the main entrance of the building is a major _advantage to this a ovation. Also,' only,one small a^sg`(0 the east side) would be subject to f f PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-09 INLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP ' May 23, 1990 Page 4 only one small area (on the east side)' would be subject to the safety concerns" due to proximity to. Amethyst: The ',location of Area Tyalso protects' children from, having to cross the north on-site driveway, Which. is advantageous :r for'reasons.listed in the -Area One description: t The location of play equipment in Area' Two a.�ts is.an advantage and disadvantage^at,the same time. A�though' he play equipment would be°mostly ;out of` view ;of street =: traffic, the='norih,''side of the,;building contains more ornate architectural elements than the: Amethyst Avenue _elevation. Placing,the 'p'lay facility, in Area Two''vaould require°the elimination, or relocation of 19, parking spaces 'Call spaces on the;,soutW side of..the north drive aisle). Relocating A ll of:"these spaces with the .constraint of,preserving: he existing trees on the northside of the drive aisle would be difficult without 'redesigning the site plan 'to.utilize some of the future development area for parking. G: . 3. Area Three ' !north og,vw`he n ve, orth. dri : ai - EIthi6it °C°) i sle The primary ,advantage to locating the`^'.play area in this + portion bf-of site is the capability;: to (w.th expand consent of the Planning Coimniiiion} if?the ,facii`ity wishes to care for more chi.ldrem or' if State,.ch ld care laws,are, modified in t4�e future. " Secondly, locating the, play: area in, Area Three would 'not require any modifications to the numbei:'`or'placement 'Of any parking spaces, .hence,' the concern rolated to the preservation of the heritage tra e.i.,wiII be mitigated.. Also, issues related to the safety of:dhlldren,from main streets and preservation 'of,.the .historic nature ,of the building are easily, mitigated by placing the play area Inthis location. How,ever, 'some potential negative impacts, are associated with play Area Three. For example, children, are subjected. to crossing the.north, drive aisle betweehrthe building and -the play area. Also-, the closer proximity of the area. to the existing residential development to the north and West " potentially, creates a compatibility of uses problem, . referenCad Jn . the April 25, 3990 Staff-Report. •`�7his . concern is proposed' to be`_mitigat0 through =condition s PLANNING COMISSION STALF REPORT CUP 90-09 - 'INLAND:AREA FELLOWSHIP May, 23 1990 P' Page 5 which limits the yours 'vf autdoor,acttvities, as wrl? as' reearsideri ,g thy? Conditional Use Permit ,in case dLy_ nega.tie" impacts as sociated:with the location of ttt�•,play area arise IYI. RECOMMENDATION: 'Staff rteoianends that the Planning Comniission " consider. ai'u'- input related.: to the three poten+ial, play, area locations. hen the rtiost appropriate play area i5 ,elQcted, staff_" reco ends i at the :�larn"ing Comission .approve. Conditional ,Use P,ermi 9 through, adoption of the.r"attachedResolution' of ppro al'. Res ectf Brad Bel E City Plan er BB:SH: y Attachments: Exhibit "A'r - Site.•Plan for Play Area One Exhibit 141 - Site Plan for Play Area Twa Exhibit. `�""-- Site Planjoo Yay.Area Three Exhibit "D" - Stiff Report f6r 66ditiona1s.Jse Permit 90-09,; dated April 25,1990 Resolutian-of Approval P t 5 yA4 } i � l wil Yo6Watbn 9aa Aron 'to°iiw atoei $ I 7.9"-wev. Cariaeum eowt"t 32.000 Dan. lass) I �✓ t:ANW&G "Ares .04,970 00,M r. Waal ' i a C vatktt naaarw rowro $7 fi 1 etlt9S aylt et _• _d t+ _.. t :� !h:•aemmatt and � 1 �q W Pitkh�9pprraeA0w t dCarroaal(Mate')` - �$ 2 H�JimO' 0 Q �. 1 C� •'�� i , 10pt $I I4 8Q fi�• •� 1 `jam J $ a b, Y 'f CTTY ®F-:R.&NO i.-td�C 11�101e1GA ITER�Y: 'CU a09 PL \tAT 'DTVI�ION TITLE� +� Plan f Pf4, ta �v,t EXHIBIT: '� �� .SC'ALEeDoe o •�slP�r� : '�61se.•ls i iS � ewy� �� Q Tabulation saa At" +°°iiA BOOM oavw o aaoa 64A } gg r Pavaran+CNrmaa 32.000Im 'L's"Mcaaed.Pea .CO.YfOt884 f4L -sRb. LRti 1 /ac+�i, � • �: Pa131]9 Pra+gW 7sL� ,� P'+4rr ..,�•,y s 1 ! SW.y++actr:+n �I a � I 2 its" t R[E7 G Q fir r + �1 QI �- ,rqi.- :r CITY.OF,RAldf q� T �Ari ONGA PtEml _cue EXHIBIT:'1131 SCALE: Sa,A1V $$ii 9rr4rr '. �h't�'_ • I 1 Y. 0 0 0 O 0 • N aP`�of$12§ � •1 omww Conroe. SMY t R 3 Pamm M Come" 37,00*smelt. ' tatma d At.. .a}.oro.att Rae aKcr oomta i 1 m.�n Ps a1Yrw laPa tP� . s. �� "3 �i:--1 �•., ` _ ply RL .aa PON :fit e r.'.Y'nMyyW ry w CITY OF iZAN6WCLacAMONGA rrEm. cup ' PLAI+IMKP INVISION f TTY'I.E: �� Nl-n C P(a_ E3fYBIT. •5 SCALE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI MNGA IST-AFF REPORT , DATE: ,April 25, 1990 TO: 6hairman14.0 Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, .City Planner BY: Stdve,Hayei, 'Assistant Planner SUBJECT- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL: USE PERMIT` 90-09 INLXRD�mEA FELLOWSHIP A request,to, establish a. day care facility, within" an. existing. building •'previously approved, or church use totaling 1fr.457 .square feet on 2.42 acres of land in 'the Medium Residential Districtl(8-, 14 dwelling ;units ,per acre), located 'at the northwest corner „ of 19th Street and ; Amethyst Avenue' APN: 20147442"ANa 01 (Related filer Conditional Use Permit 89-17.) I I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested* Approval of a non-construction Conditional Use Permit to establish a dayy g building care facilit within an existing previously approved for a church. B. Surroondina Land Use and Zoning: North - Senior.Citizen Apartments; High Residential (24-30 dwelling units' per acre). ,Also, this area is within a Senior Housing. Overlay District.' South - Single Oamily. Res idences; Low Residential'(2-4, dwelling units per„acre). East - 'Post Office, Fire Station, and Offices office, ' Professional and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per, acre). West Single-Famili Residences; Medium Residential (8-.4 dwelling units per `acre): C. General Plan Designations: Project-Site -.fedium Residential (B-14 dwelling units per North - High Residential (2440 dwelling units per"acre) South - Loa Residential (2-4 dwelling, units pe. acre),:.. East - "•Office and Civic/Community.' West -,''Med,ium;;Residentiai �8-14 dwelling'units per gore),, z• 1V PLANNING COMMISSIO TAFF REPORT I CUP 90-09 - VILA! AREA FELLOWSHIP. April 25, 1990 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The site contains the histori c Alta Loma School Building ,bul t in 19210';asphalt' A,eas and many' matmre Pine and Palm trees. The, site slopes gently to 'the south at approxirimate?y four percent. E. Parking Calculations: ,`Number of Number, of Type Square` Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage; Ratio Reouired Provided' Day;Nursery 8,807 1/Staff 12 71 (1st flr.. (max.)'__ (only)_ 1/5 children 23 (max.) TOTALS 35 71 F. Applicable Regulations: :-. The Medium Residential Oi strict,allows non�kcessory day_care facilities (7 or more `children) subject to 'approval of a: Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. II. ANALYSIS• A. Genera?: Inland 'Area Fellowship is proposing to utiti2e 'the first floor 'of an existing building, the old Alta Loma School, as a day care facility.` On gotiebar 35, 1929, the'Fellowship was_grantej, a Conditional, Usz Permit to.,.use the ;building as their church facility. This:.buiTdng was' designated as a Point of Historical Interest by ,the_City 'Council on December 21 1988, after 'recommendation from the Historic Preservation Commission. It,was the,`Counc.il's .desire to have the building restored to its original condi'cian as much as possible and to. designate it as an Historic Landmark in the future. At this time, the church proposes to offer day care .Monday through Friday, 6:30 a:m: to 7:00 p.m Churc`.i services are proposed for after , 7'y00 p.m. on Utednesday and Sunday mornings. ',.Therefore, the only church related activities that will Itake place during, Weekday working hours will be the, office activities Of the Pastor and Church Secretary. B, Issues: There— are two primary 'issues related to this request: compatibility'Oft adjacent land uses 'ard parking availability., PL; NNINd COMMISSIO ' STAFF REPORT CUP 90-09 - INLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP ` Aprit,25, 1900 Page-2 i r D. Site Characteristics: "The site contains the historic Alta Loma School Building built in 1921, asphalt areas, and many mature Pine and:I Palm trees. The site slopes gently to the south at approximately four percent. i E Parkins Calculations: 1 Number of Number, of, Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Day Nurs.ry 8,807 1/Staff 12 71• (1st flr, (max.) (only); • 1/5 children 23 TOTALS. 35 71 F. Applicable Regulations: The Medium Residential District allows non-accessory daycare facilities: (7 or more children) subject 'to approval, of a Conditional' Use Permit by the Planning Commission,. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: :Inland Area Fellowship is:proposing to utiliie-the first floor c;f an existing building, the old Alta Loma School, as a day 'care facility. On October'25, 1989, the Fellowship was granter a Conditional Use Permit to use the building as their crturch fuc3lity. This, building was designated as a Point :of -Historical 'Interest by the City Council on_December 21, 1,988,; after recommendation from the Historic Preservation •. Commission. It was the Council s desire to have the building restored to its original condition as'much as possible and to designate it as an Historic Landmark,in the future.' At this time, the c,ljurch propokes to offer day care Monday through Friday, 6 30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Church services are proposed ;for after .'.700 p.m. on ,.Wednesday and Sunday mornings. Therefore,,,Iibe only church related activities that will take place during weekday working hours will be the office activities rr the Pastor and Church Secretary. B. Issues: There are two primary issues 'related to this request: compatibility with adjacent land uses and parking. availability. PLANNING COMMISSIO STAFFL REPORT ,. cup go-Og - Z3dLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP' April 25, 1990 . Page 3 As described in the surrounding land use section, residentW land uses oi''varying intensities exist td'the north, south, and west of the.property proposed for day care. "Normally, _ �W r activities during the, most day c'a.e services tan outdoor course of a day. In some cases, ;'these two items. act to counter one another, and .create. a . potential for noise conflicts. To mitigate this concern, staff has recommended, in the past, that outdoor activities be located south and east of the building. ' In this area, the building' 'Would act as a noise barrier for Use surrounding 'residential land uses. However, the :State requires that 75.square feet of outdoor play area.be provided per child.- Given this requirement and the applicant's intention to care"for a. potential, of .100 chii..ren (_see Exhibit "C-2" , al minimum of 7,500 square feet Of outdoor play area will be required f{ outdoor activities. .- Only 1,500 square feet can :be provt sd in the. "shielded" area; an additional 6,1000' square fe4�1{ will,` be needed on-site to meet the State's requirements. In ord�•r to mitigate the potential for land 7i9 e compatibility problems, staff 'has included conditions in, the ,attached Resolution of Approval to have the Comission reconsider -this permit if arty adverse effects, such as noise, ara` created by. the day care facility operating at this site.' Also,-staff has recommended a condition that 'all outdoor pray areas will be enclosed by $ foot wrought iron fence, .or equivalent, ;o clearly specify limits of. the outdoor activities. , Finitly, . staff is recommending that only the.1,500 square ;feet south and east of the building be used until'the number of c,%�r'en exceeds 20 which is 'the number at which the secondary area""' (see Exhibit "B") will need to be otiiized. -°-` The ime of parking availability is commonly associated with a day care' use at a church facility. The approved site plan . for the church has 71 parking spaces. the Development Code requires 60 spaces for the church use and 35 parking spaces for the Aay care use, based 'on figures specified. by-the' applicant_' However, as previously mentioned, the intent.of .. the applicant is not to overlap hours of operation fov the church and, day care services, with "the exception of daily church office activities, which cnly requires the pastor and secretary. Therefore, ample ;parking should be available at all times for both uses. ,c The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District wi .i require tenant improvement plans and an approved fire inioaction request through the Department of Social Services, 4inity Care Licensing, prior to using the.• building for d care a` activities (See Exhibit "0"). Am R: PLANNING.COtA!,,SSIG" iTAFF REPORT CUP 90-09 - INLAND AREA FELLINS"17 ° April 25, 19910 Page $ Afflh C. 'Environmental Assessment': Upon review of Part L of the initial study,and,completion of Part II of the Environmental Checklist, steff has found no significant impacts relDted to' locating a day care facility within this existing church building. III. FACTS'~'FOR FINDYNGS: The Commission must make all the following findings in order to approve this,application: 1. That;ihe. 'proposed use` is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives . of 'the ` Development Code, and purposes o-,, the district iii,which the sfte is located:; and 2: That the proposed use, together with conditions appIir,'e 1 thereto, wi11 not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,,. or materially injurious to propertiest or . improvements in the,ficinity; and _ 3. That the;,proposed use., complies with each of the 'applicable provisions or' the Development;'Code.'., IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a•-pudic hearing in the Daily Report;newspaper; the property poste,) and notices: sent to adjacent property owners within.300 feet the project. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit No, 90-094 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respc ly submitted, B rad u r City PI rtner 09:SN/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit,"B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "0" - Letter from Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Exhibit "E" - Floor Plan Resolution of Approval 1` T .11 � �hw�Mrh 4.Sletlq � hJu LIMA ` tip s ,' TY GF RANfH0-Ct3CAA40NCA raM: c�' Rio-ts9 PLANItIpTC'DIti31V TmE,S�-Ir FJrHI�rr!' Nkr SCALE�f I ? ►®o.. Ubulatfon 12.4 loot >tieaw t a..r.w aa.aNlt '1 t waa..aw AM aas».on j � ! .taco► eI . C9vax apaa�at/ppd. f taaw rr..wa 7o ao t I N,sllw&t I V a tYf a•isNarpiaga«I � r .r a m wa — =ITY OF RANCHP-. jCAMOANGA ITEM: cva 90--09 PLANNING,DIVISION ., T1 rLF-. ExHISPT:��( " �CA'LE• r l O P.Q.Box At Random Cucamonga,CA 91780 t 1714)987-1200 Bill Flanders February 27, 1990 ' Pastor Mr. Steve Hayes Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 9161 'Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917SO RE: Condtional Use Permit to establish a Day, Care Facility at 9489_19th St: Dear Steve, Inland Area Fellowship is requesting that a Won-construction' p be issued to conduct a Div Care Program in the aFirst$floor of our''Fg�.ility at 9488 19th'Street ' A conditional Use Permit to use the site as a>churah was issued in October 1989. We are :in process of renovating the building in accordance with the requirements of the .Building and Ssfety,; Planning,. Fire an-1 Fngineering,departments :of the; City o'f`Rancho Cucamonga. A parking <,ot with 71 parking places. and well as landscaping will be installed on the property. The Day Caro Facility will operate Monday throLq'q :riday 6:30 a.m. to 7 p.m. Formal church hours will be on Sundays and Wednesday nights after 7 p.m. The dnty normal chui'-h activities during -the week day time hours would'be office':activity on the Second Floor by the pastor and church secretary. An`application for a Day Card;. license is being filed with the Califo=r .a 'state Department of Health and Welfare. The facility will meet Fire Department requirements pnd includes a sprinkler system, emervJncy lighting, visual and°audio alarms, and pull alarms. Panic hardware will 63 installed on all exit doors. Inland Area Fellowship is requesting a CUP to operate at this location because '(1) it owns this property, (2) tAe building will not-be used for church Pervices during weekday day time hours, 3). there is a need in the community for Quality Day Card Services, and (4) surplus income fron the Day Care will help offset the cost of upgrading the building and property. When tCe solool is, fully; operational we hope to have 115 children and a st3ft of lr),adults.' Sincerely, William R. Flanders In fir' N 0, CAM0NGA PLANNING DIMION 'LE ,r'+ P.G.Box Al Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 (7141987-1200 Bill Flanders April 18, 1990 Pastor 7 Steve Hayes Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9340 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917oi RE: Children.'s Play Argi DeaY Steve, state regulation for Day Care Centers", require 75 square feet of outdoor play area per ohild.'91e• are planning to-be licensed for .100 children This means th-t we need to provide-no less than,i 7,500 square feet c_� outside play area. The area 'to the -east ;,of the building is approximately 1,560 'square feet. Therefore, we need to..provide an additional 6,000 of play area. we are proposing to establish this additional area immediately north of the north parking lot`. A playground pf, 50 feet by 120' fe4t w111 give 'us the needed square footage. As shown in the attached map thi-. still gives us 80 feet to the northern edge ofr the property. addition, the southern edge; of the ,adjacent property to th :Mediate r1orth is a driveway. This adds at least an additional 3 ,from the nearest residence to the playground: This is a more thou:, - tequate distance and more than most preschools: I n the area provide.. Sincerely, William R. Flanders Pastor .11-Y OF IZ.01`14CffO1CUCA,MQNGA Vda' CU 9u-ag t . PLANNING PI-MION ME IBM's C-a' SC r I'_L s'% QRANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISMCr Post office Box.W,Rancho.Cucamonsa,:CaNfcrnU 971�1-M, (714)987.2M Match 5, 1990 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. P.O.Box il 07 Rancho Cucamonga, C.A. 1730 Attention: Planner $%ve RE: Inland Area Fellowship Child 'Care CUP Dear F �r 'Phis letter is to confirm the phone conversation we_had on March 2, 1990_, At this time, the church daes not have a 'form;4550 Fire Safety Iaspecd,,= Request from. the Department of Socisl Services, Community` Care .Licensing. The Fire District Will need. !v review thin form to; detcTinine the n=bers, 'ages, an4 ambulatory status of the children coveretl ;Vf this license. All thee; factors have<a direct bearing on th6l chiting requirements,applied Za the ,buildinZ. The pastor was advised this date to contact ,Licensing to start the necessary paperwork. In the meantime, you and I agreed the earliest the CUP could be to the Cornat'ssion accepting ig April'11, 1990. _ Wo4i V no"6 cotion heard before the Planning Commission.', ,, x the CUP in concept that date, with the ,condid'on that no approvals ,will be granted until all building,:Permits have been .issued, and all construction has -been satisfactorily finished and- 'inspected. _ Once that is I dome, then the church can. submit a completed door plan ,gf the area where they wish to ht licensed to care for the children. We,will do :an inspection after iwe' reviev-, their.floor, plan, and receive form #1856, It is possible this"miy exceed the April Ilit 1990,healing date. Even if that 'is the case, the Fire District will not b"s able to approve any occupancy of the - building by the children until all these requirements are met. Thanks for your help, I appreciate,'your keeping 'me advised of the status. of this. project. Sincerely. 13-V6 81fC Fire Prevention Inspector SDW/js NCRO,CiJCAMONGA U P LANIMINq D1 I®Iv fi n 18: SCALE �. t 1( �� of ere.oa. axcaa °rraw;... Qr �'., ew a.aua.: ca.eMs . muea � kr:Wdra tars twm LEVEL :0WEfR LEVEL i y GIT'Y. or-- tA"NCff� •'COCA�+%ONGn. PLEI►,�: p PLlAI� TG"DI• 5ION EXHIEI°I': " SOLE: �• t n tl � RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY` OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGAg., CALIFORNIA, `APPROVING` CONDITIONAL'.U5E, PERMIT NO. 90-09', FOR A- DAY CARE FACILITY WITHIN 'AN EXISTING BUILDING PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOR CHURCH USE TOTALING 16,457',SQUARE FEET ON 2.42 .ACRES. OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM .RESIDENTIAL 'iJ, ICT (8-14 DWELLING'- UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT-THE NORTHWEST'CGRNER'OF 19TK STREET AND AMETHYST AVENUE,, AND MAKING-FINDING-IN' -SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-474-02.ANO 03. A. Recitals. (il) Inland Area F ibw'ship has filed .an application for-the issuance of the Conditional 'Use Permit No.. 9049 as described fn �the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter :'in this Resolution, the sub3ect Conditonal ..`Use Permit requRst is referre: to as "the application." NO On December 21, 1988,; the building was designated as a-Point of .Historic Interest by the City Council. ('iii) On October 25x 1989, Inland Area -Fellowship was granted Conditional Use. Permit No. E9-17 to utilize the existing building as'a' ch,urch. Div) On the April 25 19909 and 'continued•to May 23, 1990' the Planning � . . Commission of the City of Rancho, Cucamonga conducted a duly 'noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date, (v) All legal prerequisites prior. to `che 'adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and, resolved by the;, Planning Commission of the 'City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This,Commission hereby specifically finds that a17 of the 'facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution,are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence; p °osented to this Commission during the above-referenced; public hearings on April ,25 and May 23, l990, 'including written 'and oral staff .reports, together 'with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows,: (a) The application applies to property located at the north4est corner of 19th Street and Amethyst'Averse with a street frontage of 640'•feet and lot depth of 365 feet and is presently improved with an existing b0I'diOg, paved parking areas,;curb and gutter, and' t ' PLANNING ComrssraN RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-09 Ii1LANO,AREA.FEI.LOWSNIP. Mny 23 .1990 page 2 (b) The 'property to the north of the, site it senior Citi,zeh Hoy �::n, the property to =tn� south of that site consists. of single family residences, tte property ,to the` a ist i3` developed with ,a ,Post Office, Fire Station and offices, and tre propgyky to the west is single family,res.idence3; y .: and t is (cy The property :is zoned. "Medium Res'fdentfai" by the Development Code. (d) The,proposed day care faci fty, will operate .from 6:36,aA.M., to 7;00 P.tq , Mo day:thraugh Friday, on the first floor of`the pxistinq"building. . (e) 5ervices, will' be conducted' by the approved church on Sundays and Wednesday nights after17:Q0,.p.M. , (f) The application contemplatei� a'„day carefaciiity for'up to 106 _ children in addition to the.Ghurch use.pre%" s,y approved .for this sate. 3. Based upon the` substantialf ev denc® presented to this Commission. during the above-referenced public 'hearing'-and-`upon the, spadific,findings of> facts set forth in paragraph s 1 and 2 above, this Commission-hereby,V'nd§ and .. concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with'the General Plan, ,the objectives of the Development Code. and the purposes .of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions 'applIgAble r thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,rar ,. materiaily injurious to properties or improvements in the vicin +y: . (c) That the proposed usp complies writh edch of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Th',s Commission:hereby, finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed aid considered in •compliance with the California:: Environmental Quality Ae'c of'1970 and, further;`this Commission Vrereby,issues. a Negatide + Deciaratia;i. S. Eased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs,"1, 2,` 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby .�approves the application subject to ; each and every condition set forth beio.,3 , , s PLANNING CONK SSION 'RESOLUTION N0 CUP.90-09 - INLAND, AREA:FELLOWSHIP May 23, 1990 Page 3 " ' Planning Division , 11 All applicable conditions for Resolution Eia. 89�I39 shalT,:apply;- 2) Appravai of this request shalt not waive „omplianca with,;a1T sections of the 'Development Cole and ail Other,City Qrdimances,, 3) If the -.operation of the 'facili,tycauses adverse effects upon ad 4acent businesses ar operations, including, but " not` limited `to noise 'the 'the Conditional 'Use Penrit shall be brought befdre-:the Planning Goprnission;"for consideratii;a and possibie. termirttton of the".use. 4) Occupancy of. the ;faItiTity`for 'day cf'ire use shall . not wwnence until 'Such time; as all Uniform 8'ui]diny �5de; and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied wins: Prior'to. occupancy, plans. shall be submitted` to the, Ranchb. Cucamonga :Fire' Protection District' and .the Building' and =Safety Division to show compliance:, The building shall, be inspected for compliance prior ,to utsl .ation of the building.as a day'care'faci]ity; 5) 'Any signs proposed .for the . Shall be designed -In'r Conformance with the Comprehensive. Sign Ordinance, a9d'shail' require'review,Qnd approval'by the Pianning ;Division prior to insta]:latign. 6j Operating hours for day care shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 6:.0 A.M., .to 7:00 P;Al., except national holidays, as "not'to conflict jith hours of public r assembly ,(Sundays and after ;7:00•- P.M. on Wednesday nights), 1i 7) All outdoor play activities 'shall be limitied to the 7,500 Square foot area as deemed appropriate hy`the, Planning Commission: If any safety problf.ml or he other adverse effects• arise in. relation f,C) the, Placement and size of the outdoor play area., the . Conditit:nal Use Permit' Shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideratirin 'and possible termination,of use. 8} The outdoor play area r shall be located.as 'Shown in. Exhibit " " of the May 93, 3990 Staff Rep ' ort,•" 5 (/ Ya PLANNING COMMISSION RCSOLUTIt1N NO. CUP 90-". - INLAND•AREA rELLONSHIP1 �� T May 23 1990 Page 4 9)' "The outdoor play area shall be secured.w a mum 5-foot, high= wrought iron fence vftir"pilasteips or equivalent that .depicts the'histaric nature o`f;the era In which the , building was •constructed",'`zs determined by the City Planner.'•Prior, to operation�E of the,: day care facility` ;and installataii of,_any play6quipment, detailed plans' shall.: tie;.submi;tted r for review"and approval of the City Planner 10} Approval .sha11 expire, unless extended by `the h Planning Commission, if, building:. permits" are, not Y issued"or approved use has.not 'commenced within:24 months from"the date of approval. ; 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY;OF'MAY, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAIN CHG,. UCAtONGA BY: _ Ask Larry T. RNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary a I, Brad Puller, Secretary, of the Planning Commission of, the°City of Rancho Cucamonga, do. hereby certify, that "the foregoing","Resolution' was duly and 7., regularly'. introduced passed, and adopted by "the .Planning "Commission of the City of•Rancho Cucamonga, at-a regular meeting of the Planning;Comnission held on the"23-rd day of May,1 1990 by the .following vote-to-wit:' " AYES: COMMISSIONERS: t1 , NOES: COtIlISSIONERS 1r ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: .4 Y .x CrX Y OF:RANCHO OIJCAMONG•-A STAFF REPORT DATE: May 23, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Anna-Lisa He ;Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMEaTA fI CONDITIONAL USE PERKIT 9047 RANCHO HILLS MJ haT1tY CEMTER A' jest,to establish a 4,320`square"footi� churn :office, and, meeting ''hall 'for church-related' gAttlerings in ar,�A ,,ny'`industrial park in the General; I146s rial District, ;Subarea 3 of :the Industrial Specific ;Plan, located .a1',•9390 7th ,Street, Suite C - APN 209-171-57. (Continued from April 26, a L. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A Action Requested: Approval of a non-construction Conditional ' Use Permit to establish a church/,youth group facility within ` an existing multi-tenant industrial;center at 9390 7th Street, Suite C, -between; Hellman and Vineyard. Avenues on the north side of 7th Street. . B. Surrounding Land Use and_Zoning: North - Existing multi-tenant industrial building; General' , Industrial. South - Single-family homes; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Res idential'(4-8 dwelling units per acre). East' - Multi-tenant industrial building; General Industrial (Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 3). West - Multi-tenant industrial..build'ing; General Industrial - _ (Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea.,3) C. General Plan Designations: Prodect Site - General Industrial, North - General Industrial South - low Residential' East - general Industrial West ' - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The project is developed with an existing multi-tenant industrial Center. E. Parking Calculations: See Exhibit "E". a � ITEM E PLAWRa COtgiISSION STAFF REPORT EA & CUP 90-07 >- RANCHO'HILLS MINISTRY CEHTCR May 23,:1990 Page 2 'r F. A cable Regwlations:• The Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea , 3 allows °churches .subject to the approvai;of a Conditional Use'Permit by the Planning Cormf ' fon, II, ANALYSIS: A. General: The a=rrho Hills Ministry 'is proposing to locate' a center for church•,related gatherings in an existing multi_ tenant industrial> c`implex (Golden West Industrial Park). 'The church is proposing`, to util,)ze L114 square feet of an existing 4320 square`foat'su#;te within the complex located at 9390 7th Street (see Exif, bit "B") The remaining 3,206 square feet will , be used ;as''a. gym;, facility during youth group meetings only. p ; At this time,' the q'lpp'i an -is proposing to, hold public.. assemblies on Wednesd�,l;'end Friday evenings, ,fron 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Rancho Hi11a� .Ministry is also proposing"to,develop a gym facility for the., ouch' groups, utilizing Ythe' rem aining 3,206 square `feet of the facility. Sunday afternoon gatherings,, of Ila more than 70 persons are ,also proposed. Fina ly, office hours of 9:Od a.m. to .5:00 p.m., Monday through Wednesday are proposed (see Exhibit °O"). h B. Issues: The primary issues of locating this type of use within an industrial,; setting are compatibility with surrounding businesses and parking availability. Compatibility atiith Surr6unding Uses. inere are a variety of uses within the industrial complex. Research services, business support services, personal services, light wholesale, storage and distribution, and fast food sales are typical uses located within the center (see Exhibit'"E').. The majority of these businesses operate at regular business. hours from 8,00 a.m. to 5:00 p.tt* ` The proposed.hours of operation for church activities will take place hours rin the evenings and on Sunday afternoons��� The City has many churches operating in industrial complexes with no reports. of any problems. There�foreD compatibility problems ,associated. wary this proposal aro not expected: Parking: A total of 44 ,parking spaces are required at this time (see .Exhibit "E") The facility will have 720 square feet of assembly area (I space Per 35 square feet), and 304 square feet of office space (1 space. per, 250 §quare..feet) and 3,206 square feet of the facility will be utilized as .a,.gym area {1' space per '150 square feet), There are currently 35fi t PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EA & CUP 90-07 RANCHO HILLS MINISTRY CENTER May 23, 1990 Page 3 parking spaces located on the site. The total amount of parking required for the bcsinesses within the complex is 986 spaces inclusive' of the church facility and all vacant suites. Within. 100 feet of the building, there. are approximately 63 spaces which should be more than adequate for the proposed facility. Because.of the church's offset hours, evenings and weekends, no parking; conflicts are foreseen. Sheriff's Department: :The Sheriff's, aepartment was informed.-;` of the proposed project and' exprttsed no concerns with the' proposal: - Rancho Cucamonga fire District: Thee Rancho Cucamonga Fire District expressed a number\of concerns regarding the proposal o-; la public assembly facility within' the Golden West Industrial Park. The original floor plan submitted Indicated some 3,590 square feet to be used for public assembly, On flay 2, 1990, the applicant resubmitted-,new plans, reducing the, assembly area to 720 sgWre feet with the remaining 3 206- square feet to be developed as a gym. Prior to occupancy, Rancho Hills Ministry will have to comply with those fire and safety standards as defined by the Rancho Cucamonga fire District (Condition #3). C. Environmental Assessment: !!port review of Part 1 of the Initial f tudy and completion of Part 2 of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to a church locating within this industrial center III,; FACTS FOR FINOR GS: The Commission must make all the following findings in or4ar to approve this application: A: That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, and the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes_ of the Industrial, Specific Plcn' Subarea in which the site is located. B. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the p,Ib,ic health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in thi vicinity. C. That the proposed use complies with each of the _applicable provisions of the industrial Specific Plan: IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has -been advertised as a public: hearing in The Daily Report newspapEr and properly posted, and notices sent to adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project. PLANNING.COMMISSION STAFF REPORT i EA & CUP 9047 - RANCHO, HILLS MINISTRY CENTER �. May 23. 1,990 Page 4 V. RECOPIMEMQATIONr Staff recommends approval of the Conditional. Use through adoption of the attached Resolution of ppro al. Y l/ A R,-pectfu' bmitt i� Brad Bull er City PI nner -BB:A /Jfs C a Attachments: Exhibit 'A IndustHal Specific Plan, Subarea 3 I• Exhibit '!B" -'Site Plan Exhibit "V - F1oor'P1an Exhibit "D" -,Appl'icant's Letter ` Exhibit "E" - Parking Calculations Exhibit "FN Fire District's Comments Resolution of Approval { } a ae yn_ (MEND a w NVW11Ei a cK� es e• a d., a Cam; t" a o CA 00 aav�3rn�u ���• �. zo � s a ; moo oilw b E s $ U u I i10 i =0 7th St ` 9360 71h Sc 1' r Fr'"1-N E oC S��.w^ !i ,w;6 !, F.Y ID 4 _ r d �r< �M C i 932Q Tth St C 7th St � , AMOS" 7th S"at 1 I ti CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONa4 P1Lr'iMNG DDT-ISION TxrLE. EXHYBITT C:AT E: * �'' Y ---I EV�4 AV- : . tt � FWJPK� J fiIT'x" OF RANCId® CUCAMONGA �rrrE:. cad- (� PLANNING DIVISIONSCALD: ...-- it �E7{IiI�.tT: cc' - A; _ .. a N i 14f�ef4� I I JI Q RANCHO CW(; ZONGA ITEM � PLP'�NNYNG, DrASION TITLE• �t y oh- pt-t'�'7►.l E'kHmI'I': St ALE ' G:O'N XVN IYY' ON!1R C,K Jack M0110os,Est City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning,Dept. From: 'Dick Dah1,�Rancho Hills Community Church Subject: Letter,explaining business Operations, hours'and number employees. -91390.7th St., Suite C, Cucamonga Rancho:Hills Community Churcl intends to use this,nnit as 1. Business office and pastoral"'counsel- ag Mon,-Wed'., from 9:06am to 5d00pm. Theis will be a.'maximum of four employees (including the pastor). We have ' assigned five (5) parking.spaces for the,aay use. 2 Two to,three evenings per Work week,•the unit-sill . be utilized for group church-related gatherings;' (maximum Projected seventy (70) People beginning no earlier than 6:30pm td 9:00pm. ida'have allocated to us, 48:parking spaces during these"hours 3:' Sunday early afternoon gatheriags of up tic, seventy (71 jlerSOnsi�with 49 paricing spaces allocated. The'reason we have applied"fora CUV at this location le tho' lack of large 'scguare footage structures outside of the_iight _industriai zone. Our Sunday morring services are at .4ta,Loma High School man auditorium from 9:30am to 31.30am. A All busine 'sea In our area ae , closed after SsOopm Mon3sy thru Friday,, except one alarm 'service operates-later:. We appreciatye.your consideration. r Richard Dahl Board Member P.O.110c 5M-350 8,►Rancho CUCaMOnga,CA 917010(914)945 1' CITY OF, RANCHO CUCAMOIVC= Trrl t PLANNING DIVISION, ,". `Q _XHIB TI r SC,4I,F: 0 R a f j k RXNCH€! HILLSsC ITV CHURCH" Re" St -for.CUP 047 9390 7th Street PAl8MRS.REQgXREMEEdYS ADDRESS UhiIT SQUE, FEEY F,Et�'!1 SPRCES tJA3iE q¢ COi4PAff8Y 9390 7th 3,672; Vacant' B 4,320: .. Vacan C 4a$20;" RAHCHO' HILL 60*6'If,,Y CHURCH ffi 399/230 2 Oce U,� ft etsly,Area- 31!zU6'9150 21 t8rea 0 3,600 6 Floor;Seruice`s 9320 7th A 5,040/50o 10 r:` CaITfornia "Sportswear ` 0 5,760/301, Indotek, Ins,. C 5,112%500 10Telian:�Mact. ing, 9330 7th R 6- 600/350.; 19 Uniqu Plasic 7 chnoTogy 8 3,520/350 . "10 hdiran5e Systems TochnOingtes, C 1,760 Vacant 0 1,760/350 5 GNC Erigtneering .., E . . 1,T60/400 4 ; 7nsprietic�. 'F 3;20G'; „Vacant 6 3,200 Vacant 6 Toal SpPply, �xnc. f B t,440 Hazels Nice"ihings C ]5440/500 .3 S*a'rr. Rotorsport 0 1,44C� <,000 1 `Int'I Wholesale SUP;'01' E ?1440 Pacific Stylish Systems F 1,920 Vacant: r 0 11920l500 4, Pacific Caast Salys H 1,920 ;,Vacant Vacant 9370 7th A 3,6Q0/400 9 Super Vac,. 8 3,600' Vacant C 2,400/400 6 American Appliance Repafr' D 2,400/400 5 Contigraphics?Quality Painters E 2,880/460 7 Safety Images f 2,880 Vacant Alfik G 1,698 Vacant, H t,582_ Vacant, J7; t ; �r EXHIBIT "E° i rt 9380 Uhl A 3,120%l,dd0 3t coast Sheet Metal B 2,880/400 7 ; «�s Precision Prp Seals' C 2,880 . ` Vacant D 1,9241350 5 Med Poi rst Fgchnoiogies E 1,920/400 5 Aceka.'Protection Serufcies f t,920'. _Vacaa G 11920' Vacant ii 1,92Q/cti0. :;^8 Little Caesars Fizza I 1,920 Vacan,t. €+ ' 9350 7th R t,948 6 G A Kirka Construction $ 1,980 6•. N & S cpnstruction C. 1,980'/40d 5 con(burs Restorations 0 1,980 Vacant` , 4E 60/35 GF 73 $ - wrarotbso�Yn esPtee,cIisnci on' G ,.. 9360. 7th !1 I,768 6 8rit-Bork-,construction Sateizte ,.' B• _.1;80fl 6 `Swains Sign 1,, 1, , Ts,tin C 1,800 Vacant; D 1,800 6 �� b S At�lsking E MOO/850 7 Ac% int`l F 1,80' Vacant G 1,800 ';'� ' 6'. J.C. Electrical Contractors! H 3 568 500 T Senitex'Spor35 .Weaw, TOTAL BUILDING AREA 141,256 Square feet,- Number of Spaces Required for Existing Tenants 264 (including church facility) Number of Spaces Provided for Vacant_5uites Total Spaces Required 386 Total Space. Provided 356 l DeFicietcy* 3d I *Note. The. facili£y will not operate during normal, business,hours. i' r z,._ P TION , I . , ' 'RANCHO HILLS MINISTRY CENTER 9390 7TH.STREET, SUITE C RANCHO CUCAMONGA,'CA 91730 � TELEPHONE 941.4841 1. PERMIT REQUIRED FOR PLACE OF PUBLIC ASSEMBLY-FORM PROV,j7jED, ry 85 UFC, 4.10,. I^ Z. PUBLIC ASSEMBLY OCCUPANT LOAD IS 191 FOR THE GYMNA!iUd'L ' THIS is ALSO THE SAME OCCUPANT LOAD TIIAT WOU,D BB DER-.ITTED IN THE GYM IF DINING,WAS=DESIRE%.89 CCR,TA.,"ti,43aA. 3. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE.THE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE NEW MEETING AREA UNTIL A SEATING PLAN IS PROVIDED,'8S,UFC, 2S.112. <. 4. PANIC HARDWARE AND EXIT SIGNS,REQUIRED AS NOTED ON;FIRST PLAN, '88 CCR,,3304(c). S. EMERGENCY LIGHTING;REQUIRED AS NOTED ON PLAN,'1;8 CCR,3313 (r&b).. 6, I HOUR FIRE RATED EXIT CORRIDOR REQUIRED AS NOTED ON FIRST PLAP, -68-CCR, 330S(0)• 7. (2) 2A10BC FIRE EXTINGUISHERS REQUIRED, '85 UFC, 1030I. 8. DRAPES, CURTAINS, HANGINGS,FABRIC WALL,COVERINGS REQUIRED A TO BE FLAME RETARDANT TREATED,'83 UPC,Z5.103(a). 9. AN AUTOMATIC FIRE PROTECTION Sb"'BA IS REQUIRED AS PER-.F•ORDINANCE A15,:SEC:ION ; 327: IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME THAT A CUP BE ISSUED UNTIL THE OCCUPANCY HAS A COMPLETE PLAN CHECIC,WITH ALL REQUESTED ITEIAS SHOWN ON THE?LANE. THIS REPORT IS FOR COURTESY PURPOSES ONLY TG ASSIST THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.. ' CITY OF [j rrEM. PLAN ` SION e2NG�1 TULEr dG EXHI IT." SCALEt �° a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING.`.COMMISSION'`OF THE CITY "OF RANCHO.'000AMONGA; 'CALIFORNIA, 1kPPR0VINGr,'CONDITI0NAL, USE," - t PERMIT NO. 90-07 FOB'A CHURCH'.OFFICE AND MEET.IM-0-ALL FOR ' CHURCH-RELATED GATP,ERINGS IN AN EXISTING.'INDUSTRIA PARK IN THE GENERAL "Ii�bUSTRIAL DI STRICT;,'SUBAREA ''. ,OF THE" INDUSTRIAL.SP.ECIF',,C' PLAN, :LOCATED'. AT 9390 7YtA STREET,' SUITE _C, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT'THERcOF - APN: 209-171-57 A. Recitals. " (i) Rancho Hills Ministry has filed an application. for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No, .90�07 as :described._;in the<_titie of. this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,- the subject Conditional Use Permit request is rP.ferred to;as "th<<`applicattion." (it) 'On flhe 25th day of April, 1990, and continued to the 23rd day of May, 1990, the Planning Commission of<'the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a' duly noticed public hearing on the'application" and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution< have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it "is hereby found, determined and resolve3 by the.. Planning Commission .of the City of Rincho',Cucamonga. as•folloWs: - 1. This Commission hereby specifically, finds that'all of the facts f set forth in the Recitals, Part A,' 'of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence" presented` to this Commission during the above,-referenced public hearings on, April 25 and ;May. 23,, 1990.,, including'written and oral staff'reports, together with public.testimgny, this Commission `:ereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to "pr'.operty located at 9390 7th' ' Street with a street frontage;of 669.66 feet and lot depth :of'-649.03 feet and` is presently improved with eight multi-tenant industrial buildings; and " (b) The property to the north of the sdb3ect site is".General> Industrial and ,Lora Residential, the 'property to the ;south I of that site:, consists of Low Residential, •the property to the.east is<General Industrial, and the property ao 'the,'west is General Industrial. PLANNING COMMISSION'RESOlUTIONNO. `. CUP 90-07:- -RANCHO NILLS,MINISTRY r May 239 1990 Page 2 (athe application contemplates the operation uf'a'church in- the evening after 5.30' p m.".and on weekends. business offices `and pastoral" counseling will be conducted during the day'from 9s00 a.m. un.tii"5c00 pm t There "are.-: no .other °tenants within `the complex Which,} operate in the evening hours except "for an alarm.coipanys._,.{ (e) The property is improved with,,a total of` 356 parking- spaces, of which '44 .are •required during• peak demand 'i,' the .eveni.ng and on weekends.for the,_-:arch's use. , r; 3. Based upon the.substantial evidence presented to„this Cominission'' during the above-referenced public hearing and upon, the'spec,ific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I,and 2 above, this Commission hereby flnds and concludes as follows: (a) That' the proposed use is``in accord ;with the..Gdneral P1ar,, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of ;he,district ill.. which the sites located. (b), That the proposed use, together with~the conditions applicable thereto, wily not be detrimental to the public health, ;afttr, 73r. welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvea4nts in" the vicinity. (c) That the proposed u'se ,complies with e6ch of the applicable- provisions of the Development Code 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered.:in compliance with the"California=Environmental - Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set;'forth in^pa"ragraphs\: 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this CWmission hereby approves the application.:subject . to each and every condition"set forth below. Planning Division . 1) Approval of this request shall not waive I compliance .with all sections of'the. Industrial Area Specific Plan,,, and, all other City Ordinances. , 2) If the operation of the facility causes.'advee 1:effects upon adjacent businesses',or operations, the Conditional,'.Use Permit shalt be brought be,bre the Planning Commission: for tha I y consideration and ;possible term 166tion:.nf,:the use. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-07 -. RAK.'HO HILLS MINISTRY May 23, 1990 Page 3 7; 3) Occupancy' of the facility shall not commence �. until such time as all 'Uniform Building Code and ;State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied''With, Prior to'o;cupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Foothill fire Protection District and the Building and `Safety,, Division to shore compliance. The building, shall be inspected for cnmpliance prior to occupancy. 4) Any sign proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and any Ui 'I' m Sign Program for the complex and shall require review and approval by the . Planning ' Division prior to installation. 5) The facility shall be operated 'in conformance with the performance sta;!dards for Subarea 3. 6) Public assembly (i.e., church gatherings;-,youth meetings, etc.) shall be allowed to operate-on weekdays from 6.30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.' and on weekends. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption: of this Resolution. l APPROVED AND ADOPTED THI S 23RD DAY OF MAY, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA{IONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST. Brad Buller, Secretary I. Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of:the City of Rancho Cucamonga,_ do hereby certify that the foregoing- Resolution was. duly, and regularly introduced, passed, and- adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held' on the 23rd day of May, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: iday 23 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Ply-,..;�r Jerry Guarracine, Assistant 'Planner SUBJECT: FNVIRONMENTAL`ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-10 JOAN H. ACHUFF SOUTHNEST 'TRt IN;ING CONSULTANTS -; A request to establish a driver training school in a teased space of 3.,312 square feet within an existing business park on 5.7 acres of land in the Industrial Park District, Subarea 7 of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at the northeast cornier of Arrow. Route and White-Oak Avenue - APN: 208-35241. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: II , A. Action Requested: Review of Conditional Use Permit application to establish a driver training school in an existing Industrial Park. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonino:- North - Vacant; Industrial Park South Vacant; General Industrial East Vacant; General Industrial West - U.S. Post Office; Industrial Park , C. General Pian Designations Protect Site - Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South General Indust-10 East - General °Industrial Wei` - Industrial Park D. Site, Characteristics: The proposed use is located within an existing Industrial Park known asArrow Business Center. The Development`contains approximately 151,,000 square feet of mixed use space.`in, 11 single story buildings'. The center, which is s occupi Less than 50 perzent leased, ied by a' variety of office and light warehouse uses, a small delicatessen and the Alano Club(see Exhibit "DO). ITEM';F PLANNING COMMISSION'`STAFF REPORT CUP 90-10 - JOAN H. ,ACHUFF' May 23, 1990 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number"of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Commercial School 3,312 * 13 13 The '13 parking spaces required for the proposed use will be provided as;folR:-Is: .9 spaces are available based on the 3,312 square foot leased space and 4 spaces 'are being provided within 1 the building for driver training automobiles. * Section 17.12.040 (W "Trade schools, business colleges, and commercial schools: One for each three (3) student capacity of each classroom plus one for each faculty member or employee." II. ANALYSISc A. Operation: The applicant is proposingwtG establish a driving school in a 3,312 square foot leased space"in the existing Arrow Business Center Industrial Park. Driving schools are classified as a personal service by the Industrial Specific Plan, which is conditionally permitted in 'Subarea 7. 'The school will provide classroom training and practical experience to prepare people for the'California Driver's License exam. In a conversation between staff and the applicant, Ms. Achuff mentioned that bus driver .training would also be ''cox.ducted at the school. Said training would include both ins',uctional and on-road training. Interior improvement will be made according to Exhibit 'C"_and will include office space, a reception area, 2 classrooms (10 students each) and indoor parking for 4 driver' training vehicles. The school will provide-driver training for U111'1 to 20 students at any one time .and will operate during the hours of . 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM, Monday through Friday; 800 AM :to 4:00 PM - on Saturday; and 12:00 ,PM to 4:00 PM on Sunday (see Exhibit B. Parki":g: A hoagh schools have the potential to adversely effect parking, no confiic is anticipated in this case because most of the students do not drive yet and therefore are dropped off at the school or picked up by the' driving instructor. Further., the largest classes are expected to take place in the evening hours or on weekends, ' during which time, the vast majority of the, businesses in. this ,center will 'be',zlosed. i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-10 JOAN H. ACHUFF May 23, 1990 Page 3 t, Including the 4 spaces provided withi'.n the ,'leased space, 13 spaces are available for this use as required by''Code Section 17.12.040.(0). The site is fully developed and no opportunity exists to provide on-site parking for busses and no such facilities exist presently. C. Land Use: 'A secondary concern as compatibility with edjacent „ uses.. No conflict is anticipated as a ,result of the 'traffii school. The instructional nature of the use -will not create any conflicts in the .center, prnvided adequate parking is available as discussed. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part_II of the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this ,project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to approve the Conditional Use Permit, the Commission would need to make the followirqfindings: 1. That the proposed use is in accordance with( r:ic 'General- Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Indus,.:ial Park District in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the,' ic health, safety, or welfare or materially injuri,00s,'to the" properties or improvements in the vicinity, 3. That the proposed u'le-complies with each'of the :applicable provisions of the Developed Code. It; is the opinion of staff that the necessary findings to support granting this Conditional Use Permit can be made. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report ,newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. i V. Recommendations: Staff recommends_ that the Planning Commi'ssiow, approve Conditional Use Permit No. 90-10, subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative .Declaration. FA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-10 - JOAN H. ACHUFF May 23, 199 Page 4 Respec fully tted Brad Salter City Planner r, BU:JG:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" Floor Plan Exhibit "0" Tenant 'List~ E;,nibit "E" -:-Letter from Applicant Resolution of,Approval z r x qj � a ri ara qj LU ® � _ p �. 79 � m LU r DnJ _.....; p�,. Oft i 41 0 t�l��� t tl!O— 3 G7 As a DP OAVinn 0 j au. 7 Omer AYN m rin A z0 -DAV 03 to Jaw � _ a (,) r. Ave roi asp+ v c� •F,.+. F, �` a ,� o } ?i v.,+� '' e ,�, b FP2'F-' H d' yr" .- a wF "iN'ICt !Y � # r t �� ro N vrv' � e� s�- F �Kx`�SFr• ks' � t;h � v v] i � �,�t�Hx. x '• 4.. � }�. :"� s ,? a � .•. t �''�� 5� l s��"�� }� � x �A � ��o t; •� �� n � 4,. �, � did� F uj ,fi p #.� e i�` a s L. �xM r c a a�`. � .,. t3� �� p. i ." 4 P w« a'x' s v _+ x {�d a- t �� s ':t' r �t s•s { ,. ;' F y 1 rk' ''r $ �`adTr 5 �, r P,,.�, � .i � ��1 � - _ �... r a «.T .�+ ;I� a�k.,O•y, �+ 1 71 J�yi,rF s s e i; ".a � - # .1 i! 3�'` • r y r l ry,� �ti d -.r F c t��• r`•Gd \3{ i ,� * �1 `s R ; y.' � :�. i r1 ��' �+jr w�� )"� \�[ � '�r.n 3^ � * � ♦ :F. iS � � z �;� � �Fly � P t i. g � � d :i yg'• �2+ /� r�i t �t S mat; r� ���f7��i:e. O � } '1:i� � S� meµ'y' �+ �, •� ...1 � •�;. �'' \r`;:r �r x �'ys-6��' wf a w t$c i } ,'�,r �,' 5 :: \�/• #'' t r 4' �'9 F.,.z 4� 1 Y - 71�,m,� � I.•�d , e o � '�►tee. ��,.•� �, •��� .T+F' r !! ° d s 4i x. .xr 1 d z t k - • Y •�� 1�1 1 1 17, � C! �. vl r ( }`� "I' ' i` 1 1, i' � �f� .4. ��� 'r,N _";Y +T.+ ,� ��� .. _ �. n � i'�:j .,, �� c,..> �; �" ti �, .`� �K r.:�' �F i ��� i�) .� '. i + � '_: r. '; � .. . ':..� '. .., .i '. ,, . z r' x ��' - ,#: Q.' . 'S`..T � ..., 'fi � � � 'P' 'f` T-.� T "tom T '1`�. T � 'T� � � T.��, .:. ... - i.� �:: '. ', � i i-. : . ,:' c ,. ,�yo¢ R `" 'h�v �" ���. � u m { x tmmw -Pogor Ob Am a ne `e A sal3fi Same SAVW a Pdl n A o Ion AY@ 13 l•4.d.�aiw '� :Cv r•y t .t 9'll;�iA ... .Tr. `. . all 1 ' ' jr •®��r' i► ji *r :�� ✓?�e�j ',F;�►i �� ,"� ,y��7��{-����•��1 r�Irk � ,: w.., tiA fi� al C y 't. 106 = �►�1'to Y�� '"�' 1.A�9�, R�g�- i-v o ti�� �,-1•r����e�,-s t _ 1656 �✓° 1655 �.�. e . � e n V f RM.� 0'2 SMat� ca9,$ (�onht 9•^•a-'• �S nw• C, i ,.24 24 QfY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. I'rEtvt: C�c�'r� �4or- PLANNING DIVISIONTom' '��`� e�"' N'v EXHIBM'C. SCALE: rA,r I . ARROW BUSnms CEwm P®RL=G CALCM ATEONS: LEASED SPACES AND IICi EASEiD.SPACES LEASED SPACES: ldueber of amber of Pe Square, Parking ;,Sgacea Spaces . of Use Footage Ratio IMuIred -provided"', j, Office 179855 4/1600 72 72 ' Office with 34,62k 2/1060 7p 70 warehouse Delicatessen 1,638 2/1000 3 (3+) OPEN Alano Club 2,440 . 2/1A00 5 (5+) OPEN TOTALS 56,557 150 150+ t UNLEASED SPACES: Office 14,763 4/1000 60 60. Office with 69,057 2/1000, 138 138 warehouse TOTALS 83j,820 198 196 Total Parktag Speces in Center: 400 Total accounted for: 348 Total open spaces (EXTRAy i 52; 0 { CITY ` OR`RANCHO CbCAMONOA � LAP c�®-�p r PT;�tING l©I 'ISIIV ' T1Tt.E:•T�rt' EXEii"B ��` SCALE: r U WEST ThAiNiNe "suLTANTS SCHOOL BUS DRIVING REGION. NNUAUVREQUIRA SAFETY DWERR TMININD P.O.BOX 743 •' A{4a L=16 0A 91781 o 714 M% . 5670 Sapphire St. 00�3 IJ L T A 14 TO: City planning Commission, Rancho Cucamonga FROM: Soutt,west Tra%:ning.0onsultants DATE: March 16, 1990 SUBJECT: ' Application for C.U.P.'to operate the SOUTHWEST DRIVER TRAINING SCHOOL This business will be operated to offer full-time driver training to the local community.' At this time, except ' for a part-time operation, all driver'training,lb done by businesses outside the community`., Emphasis will be on all ages and, persuasions, butres- peciaily for the new driver. The .business will grow as much as pomsible, and not be limited. All parking of'vehicles will be within the limits allowed. Parking inside :the buildings vill be available for a limited number, but they will be out of"sight-in that manner. Since the beginning driver is dropped )f£ ,fo'r classroom training, and instructors pick them uf,, .11en they 'are behind- ' the-wheel, it is not anticipated- that large numbers will be parking at the facility. If classroofi is held, it is usually; is the evening, after the regular work day. Therefore, it is. not anticipated to be a problem. . If it is, they ,can` park in- the streot. The hourai of opening will be as follows: Blom. thru Fri: 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 P.M. Sat. 8 00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Sun. 12:00 noon to 4"O0 p.m. The largest number ofemployees on any shift Mould be six ). Each unit, at .1,656 sq. ft. would alZow 6 parking place, I understand it. if ni#, 88e to ITEM: C .Cx�� GfS-10 MY OF�RANCHO CUC"ONGA TITLE.16a. e EXIMBrr.`F_"_,SCALD t RESOLUTION NO. A P,ESOLUTION OF 1AF.:PLANNING COMh1ISSION OF- THE' CITY OF N RANCHO -,CUCAMONGA' CALIFORNIA. 'APPRQ04 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-10 FOR A DRIVER TRAINING;SCHOOL LOCATED AT 8439 WHITE OAK AVENUE, #105 & 106 IN THE 'INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT; SUBAREA 7 OF:YHE INDUSTRIAL SPcCIFYC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN': 209-352-41.. ;. A. Recita]e. (i) Joan, N. Achuff has filed an application, for the issuance .of the Conditional Use Permit No.. '90-10 as described in , the tittle of this Resolution. Hereinafter in ',finis Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit requE_st is referred to as "the application.`°, (ii,) On"the '3rd of.May, 1990, the Planning Co.�aaission of the 'Q ty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted .J duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites ;prior to the adoation of this Resolution have occurred. Y B.., Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resoived by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds 'that all. of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to, this CoWzision during the above-referenced public hearing on May 23� 1990, 'including -written and oral staff reports, together with..public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:` (a) The application applies to property located at 8439 White, Oak Avenue, 1#I05` & 106 Subarea 7 of the IndustriO Specific Plan, with a' street frontage of 62G' feet and lot depth of 660 feet and` is presently' improved with 1509700 square feet of industrial space and parking; and , (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, Industrial Park, the property', to the south of the site consists,of .vacant, - General Industrial; the property to the east is Induv , > strial;and .' the property to the'wast is a post office, Industrial Park, (c) The application is fora driver training school providing ` classroom and on-road training. vE, tt PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. � CUP 90.10'- JOAN H;ACHUFF May 23, 1990 Page 2 (d) Driver traifling _schools are class .Pied ,as.,.a personal serrsce, by the Industrial 5pecifjc Plan,, which is conditionallyfpermittad in Subarea 7 of the Industrial Specific plan, (' parkingxistst(el Adequate off-street o me"et,'th, needs 'of the students and faculty of the school; however, the site is no_,designed to accommodate bus parking. , ;! (f) 1. The proposed traffic school will be compatible W�V the other uses in the center and the surrounding;'land uses.. L,. ` 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to ;'his Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of, facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above: this Commission hereby (finds and ' concludes as follows: (a) That: ;the proposed ,use is in, accord i�i th`.the general Plan, the objectives of the ,Developmcnt'Code, and the purposes-of the district in which the.sit2 is located. ,. (b) That the proposed use, f;gether with the, conditions applicable thereto, will..not be detrimental to'-the public health, safety, br welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable ` provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Comm ssion'hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1910 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative` Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions sQt forth, in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission, approves tl►e application subject. to each and every condition, set for*h:below. i' Planning Division: 1} Any modification, expansion, or other change in operation will require an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit. 2) The 'applicant shall submit plans to. the Building L Safety, �Divislon for permits for tenant ,improvements prior'to.construction. The applicant shall comply with the 'latest, adopted Uniform Building C:'de, Uniform Mechanical Code, j' Uniform P1'umbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances and f: PLANNING`COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, CUP 90-10 - dOAN H. ACHOFF May 93, 1990 ". Page 3 < regulations.in effr,,t at the time. of issuance of,b0lding';permit .11 3) Any signage proposedi`;+r the facility shall be y designed in. conformance theComprehensiv2 Sign-Ordinance and any Uniform S gn Program for the center. and "shall require repiew and . approval by the ,Plann.ing Division 'prior. to installation. 4) Class sizes shall be limited to a maximum of 20' students during the..haurt'of 8:00 AM o 5 PM Monday through Friday, to avoid negatively im actin p g par ki ng on.,the sate. 5) A one-hour rated fire wall with similarly rated doors shalt be. constructed between the classroom and the automobile storage area, per. the Building iand Safety Division requirements. and'standards. 6)'` Bus driver training 'shall be . limited ':'to classroom insiructi,Lsn only, on-site, No; busses are ;to be parked ,)r brought, to .the site. in connection with the driver training school, 7),; If the operation of the facility causes adverse, effects upon the ad3acent businesses operations,' he Conditiona'f Use Permit.shall be brought before the Planning Cgmx.zissfons:for the consideration and; possible termination o'f the use. 6. The Secretary to" this Commission sha1;1 certify to ;the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY W MAY, 1990. PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA BY: Larry T. McNiel,.Chai an : ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary yr - •. t PLANNING COMM13SION RESOLOTION NO. ;q E COP.90-40 =- dOAN H" AC fit;FF May 2%1990 Page 4 ' T_ Brad Bu11er, Secretary of the Planning; Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ;certify that the R�: e.idfi"q� Resolution was- duty and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by iheIPlanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at"a regular,meating of the Planning Commission held' on the 23rd day;of,'May,' 1990 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: ` COMMIS§jx)NERS: sfiti NOE:' COMMIS'S ONE►i3: -ABSENT: COMISSIONERS;'.'^ D 1. r' 1 all C, C. r „ A CY OF RANCHO.fil' CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT z DATE: May 23, 1990.., TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE 'TRACT'11626 H & S DEVELOPMENT ='The design review of building elevations and detailed sisite'p1 „3 for6-lots of a previously "approved tract'map consisting' of 82 "single-family lots on 8653 a-.res of land 'in the Very;Low Residential District (less, than 2 dwelli ng units per acre) located west-of Beryl Street and north of Almond Street - APN: 1061-801-3,,5 through 9, 149 18, '19, 2' through' 26,. and 29 through' 32 and 1061 817"'"hrough 3, 8 through 11,`18 through 21 , 23 through 25, and 27 through '29. VARIANCE 90-04 - H & S DEVELOPMENT - The request to exceed the building- envelope established by "the 'stIlside Development Ordinance on 13 lots 'within a 36 lot-design review,applicatirn in the;Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) located west of Beryl ;Street .and north of Almond Street - APH: 1061-801 3, 5 through 9, 14, 18,' 19, 21 through 26, and ,29 through 32 and 1061-81.1-1 through -3 8 through 11, 18 .through 21, 23 through "15, and 27 thr6agh 29. I. PROJECT AHD SITE DESCRIPTION A. Action Requested Review of Building ElevatiZns, Detailed Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Grading Plan, and Variance to exceed the building envelope established by" the Hillside Development Ordinance. B. Pro3ect Density: ' .95 dwelling units per acre. Y: C. Surroundink Land Use and Zoning North - Vacant; Gpen space, South - gingle Family Residential; Very Low Residential strict (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). East ;cant; Very Low Residential District Oeiv'than 2 welling units 'per acre). . 4 3 z West - Vacant and :Single"Family Residential; Very Lditi, ems." Residential District (less than 2 dwell;ng units -per . , acre). ITEHS 6 &4-— J PLANNING COaMISST'IN STAFF REPORT OR FOR TT 11626 & VAR' 9G-04. N b S'DEVELOPMENT` Mr y 23, 1990 Page 2 r D. ,.sneral Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - Open Space South - Very Low Residential East - "Very Low Residential West - -Very Low Residential It. ANALYSIS: A. General: On July 27, 1983, Tract Map 11626 (a subdfv3 sion of 82 lots on 86.53 acres) was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission.. 'The'streets and trails were constructed. On March 23, 1988, the Planning Commission approved the Design Review for 23 lots within the tract (Brimar 0e4elopmek). The floor plans range in size from 3,100 square feet ti 4233 square feet kiyr floor plans were Proposed, each fl' )r plan has three elevations (Mediterranean, Tudor, Traditional/Coloniat, Styles), three of the four„floor plans are two story. These homes are: currently under construction. At this time the applicant, pp H & S Deveiopment, has submitted plans for the development of ,36 other lots within the tract. A total of four floor pens have 'been included, ranging in size from 3,900 square, feetto 4,600 square feet.` Plan' One contains' both uphill and downhill floor plans; Plan Two contains one uphill floor plan; -Plan Three contains;, one downhill floor plan; and Plan Four con"ins both,uphili and downhill floor plans. Each floor" plan contains four elevations. At the direction of staff, the applicant revised the application to include a side-on ,garage. Presently eight lots (22%) have been designated for this floor plan. The slopes within the area range from approximately 6 to 10 percent tram north to south; therefore, the Hillside Development Regulations apply. Because of this ,'-onstraint, -' emphasis was placed on the utilization of minimal grading techniques in the 'previous tract and design review approvals. Taking U i into consideration, the 'applicant is proposing split-level pads which incorporate the use of stem walls and raised_foundations. . B. Variance Re-quest: ' Variances are requested on 13 of the lots to allow for flexibility i'rem the building envelope provisions of the-recently adopted Hiliside Development Ordinance, The Commission gust 'consider..,whether or not a demonstrated hardship on the part .of the applicant exists and thus allow fora deviation from these standards. The Variance "request r" PLANNINu COMMISSIONS AFF REPORT ' ' DK 'TOR TT 11626"& VAR'90-04• - H A S_DEVELOPMENT May 23,'1990 Page ,3 focuses on two primary issues; the first, adjacent -resideiiecs were not, built under the same development restrict{Q.�ks,; and „ second,. the tract was subdivided and substantially graded'' prior to the adoption of the Hillside Development, Ordinance (see Exhibit "H"). The applicant has attempted to revise the project bms d upon the building envelopes established by the Hillside, Development Ordinance, yet on 17 of the 36 lots (47%) the proposed structure excew-Js the envelope requirements (see Exhibits L"H.i Four, lots (Lots 3, 22,_53, and 55) exceed'the building envelope requirements by a heigbt up to 1 foot, 6 inches and will be regulated by the ttinor Exception review process, The 13 'lots within 'the, Variance application can he divided into two groups.,,:,-Six of the lots exceed the building envelope hslght 6equirements. by.a height ranging,from Z to 3,feet (tots 10, 12i. 30N 5;x 60, and 71). Seven;of the lots exceed the buildfng envelu}p Neigh*'requirements by a heigi�t ranging from 3 to 8 feet (Lo114 52', 56,,57, 59, 64, 65, and`60 j, However, it should be noted that the portion of the 'structur,`exceeding . the envel—le has �a lenath ranging from 10 to 60 feet and is ,enerally-.acAted;'tow.ara the rear of,the structure and does not involve the overall heir-)t of the structure,but a portion OF,the inclined plane esta6iishPO by tht - Hillside Development Ordinance. (see Exhibits. "Jl" thrnuah "J13"). In the two instances where the building exceeds the`:knvelope fb,s a length of 60 feet`, it is not a solid, pla,r,'J,,,-As in fact`broken up substantially by movement in the elevation (see Exhibit "K")'. The intent of the K_408n9. en:elope is to prohibit bulky, massive facades running `the full �:ength of the house., to preserve views; and to maintain light, airi and open Space between dwellings. Variance approvals are subject to findings. to ensure that they do not constitute a grant 'of>spe0 al privilege inconsistent with`-the limitations -imposed-_-on oth,�w projects in the vicinity. A17 other, residences within this' subdivision, including those built as custom homes and those built through design review approvals, were not subject to the same building, restrictii,ns. The applicant was inforsred throughout the design r�vtew process that they would': be subject to the building envelope' requirements established by the ordinance li and they have attempted to modify their design accordingly'; .:��nK� f 5, =, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF] REPORT DR FOR-TT 11626 I& VAR:90-04 -.::M & S:DEVELOPMENT May 23,1990' Page 4 the applicants etter of'justification con ests: that the dr'sign of the subdivision, togL'ther with the restwiction5:af the °Hills+de Development Ordinance,,are limiting ,Factors in ilia design of their homres," Further,, ;that ±he SZusing market is very .competitive 'and fnr- the app f,-ant to remain competitive against homes that were riot Wlt with the same building re;tOictians .would constitute .imposing' conditions that were rat imaosed on like. properties,in the vicinity.. 'to .the design of`the" subdivision being'#-�Ae3 In regaildgn limiting factor, the following can be considered.. At the time the tract' was subdivided,, the ,:primary building restricts;ns WO-re . setbacks,. _'lot " covtrage requ;iremen'ts, and he;yht'- limitations. With the newly adop`ed . building envelope requirements,;. the design of',, the Y}second (story can. be subs,antially"Impacted. To compensate for-the reductions;in building 'd.,!66t and second story squ'ar footage imposed by the ' Orct3nance,;nEw.sUbdivisons ma!i:be designed wh „ "wider:lots to 5 possibly increase building square., foo.eage. and to `avoid conflicting with 'the ouilding envelope r?qufrcmantsw: �' Des n Review Committees On March 22, 1990, the":Ccr.tittee _ Blakesley, Chitiea, Krou.til) reviewed the'project but did not ' recommend a:pr,oval due to the following concerns 1. Extend` building accent matt �ia1s, i.e., brick, stone, etc., ' to the s e etevations,-ending at a logical termination point. Extend' s. ding mate Ial• approximately 3 �?eet,as 'soown is notacceptable. 2. Frovide additional accent material to the side_eleyations of all floor plarss;,,pecif Gaily-Plans 1; and. to break, up large blank expanses of stucco. �' I 3. Provide multi-paned ;Indows on ;ome windows of 'all elevations. 4. , The Committee. reviewed the proposed stone- material and questioned its applicatjion and appearance, as the material is manufactured, stene. The applicant' was advis"ed to work with staff' and bring In;material samples and photographs of applications. y . The Connitte�' determined that the full Commission,' should fiave the opportunity,-to review,the ,proposed accent materials :('see Condition No s). ; PLANNING CfliigflYSS1`OM STAFF REPORT DR FOR`TT 11626 & VARl90 04 :N $'�S DEVELOPMENT May 2S, MQ. Page 5 ` 5. T„4e,`Committee reviewed the;prodect's compliance with the. required building envelope restrictions and the°requested; ` Variance ,application. The Cor aittet(:recogni'zed that ' conditions exist`th'at affect the 'proposed ,grading, house design,_,and building,envelope, but made n6.,dev'ertjina';,Joni or recommend ations. pertaining to the Var:iance:. ' `. The sppiieant revised the project 'and �sd3mitt;ed it for,reviEw by the.. Committee (McNiel' heinterger, Coleman) on-'April i5, 1990: The .'Committee did not approve ttie revisions. as.on- presented requested addi,tion4l architectural dntail tiq;on a side, and rear elivations.. On A rill 19� 1990, ,the Co►rnl'tiee ' L?LcNiele Weinberger,. Coleman reviewed rEvised clans and recormended"approvat with;the foliowina chanoest erier��nimneys sh ould'util''i'ze' th4 accent material' . (i.e.,>stone cpr. brick) of the ,front elevations. 2. Additional stone or brick shou9d be .added -to selective el eya�t.i ons. III. FACTS FOR .FINOIMGS: . In order, for the Plc�ning Commission>;to + approve Design Review for Tentative Tract` _, and Variances ,90 04E the following 'findings must be made A. r sign Review for Tentative 'Trace_ ._i6'r_fir: Assuming *the ;. variance 1s` grantedt the project �`ts cons'istert==`w,ith thr; Development Code and the General Plan;, The project will -not ` be detrimental t ,adjacent propertied or Gauss significnni: envirnnmental impacts. In addi-ti3an, 'the prnpozed ,use is in I` compliance with the applicable provisions of"the Development Code and CitS�"•Standards. I. B.. Variance 90-0+1= ' L Thal strict or TZta4'�'"interpretation and ensorcen�ent of { tie .specified' reguoa-ion would result in;,,practical difficul-Ly or unn�ecescary ,physical hardship inconsistent with t`e obJeccives'of the Develooent Code. I 2. That there are`exceptionai or extraordinary ci.rcumstanc;es . or, conditions applicable to' the pro��i�ty. iirvolved or to the ntendad use o,f the "property=. that do not apply yeneralj to it rroperr;es: in the .sPa3e district. 't"or literal interpretation and enfordem bt ;af • � �t 1, rpgulatior would ,deprive the appti�ant 'of toyed by° the owners of other properties'=in -..thc7 rS.J2M` 'cte d It d' t PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT :& DR FOR TT 11626 VAFI`%40-04 H &,S OEVELOPM9NT May.23,.1990 Page 6 rf 4. That the granting of the Variance wilt not cony;, 't a . grant o: special ; PrivilegE;. inconsistent wit'i 'the. limita�'lj AS,on .other proper�ies:classified_ iri'the s�rie district. :> at the4grantingaf the Varianco will not be.detrimertal to the pikIz,c health, sa`'ret s y, or welfare or materially,: ' x a _: w rou to- properties or improvements 'in .the vicinity: 7 r` IV. `',ORRESPONDENCE.' The ,Variance appi� ,titian was _advert4sed%as a public hearing; _ia.�The" DaiIN Reborn newspapers 'the property" 'was r tad, ant notices were sent *o_'all property owners within'300 n. feet,of he. project'& fe.. ' V. RECDI �EtdDATIONr If the, 'Planning Lom�iisSion 'can support required findings. thon approval of the Variance and Design Review °quests, thr`uugh adoption of the at`sched,\Resolutiann: s►ould be a-pp opri'at l tY P RelSpectf fibmitte I iN} arrd Bu ie " tits Pla er% 88:TGlj s - Attachmr �tss Exhibit "A°' Site utllizrtion Exhibit Site Pian ` Exhibit "C" Tract ?13p Exhibit "D" -'Conceptual; Iding,Rlan Exhibit "E" Goncoptual Landscape Plir� Exhibit "F" -Building. E1,o-vations, Exhibit "G�' -;Floor;�FTan ,. " Exhibit.,"His Building Envelopes. Exhibit "I" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "J" Variance Building Envelopes Exhl'ba "K" Variance Examples Exhibit "L" k Variance Summary Resolution of Approvil .for 'Desi"gn Review for'TT 11026 ` and Standard Corditions Resolution of Approval for'%ariance 904 �t { AV. it ot Aw T Sol/ y_ U- IC w i 5 ir � s I Jam• s / �. ',i 'mwos 'sL3 t �Z• 4 1 = � r� I 1 is y�y4 . ,i ep aai a•a•.m• avam G,["f&AA'A-JW DO THE CITV OF CIVCS'l CUCADIONGA.CALIFORNIA »Y u7a 7 am 7 01 tm[r»rm�eaa�r a.nT t,or.ee7soa ai.7namr.t mma,msa 7.af. IM ixn 7ilYppnp.mlolEa.acm®m TD.to omeut vau 7a7>d:7a®faxs a7n taq WR7:.JA to meta .• �'�M��.�s�nncar asron�m un v�m is main.weafm n•YxvrtY w rm w.1tl as e0urxmr w sa4�s�'�"`�49rF�6kL4Pei�i�l.lSiisn`�a,I .rlYlrlel�/�sr.�?Kd�4.��FFi"w .la+ea�ae•Y � p1"'°cnwmsL a®asa• am•rz•os•w sessna•--�, Ipi r I a�a, mn ra 2rpto ' In �� it a 1 •-., 1 $ it 'a:+a•-..,' ly NON «�•� � -b •S .VA . ''Pier`"R•� ,•�' s� R,� _® .e. .wcx a 40Z Wir f q• ��. a�.a0 MY yAN aa_ba•L - ®��r'Ot'i•ar a• MM a¢MfC• }j<a i /: / re i,� �o o to .e (�y...�.ar.m•r .r.o +ear• sr.r• s i P./r r n "1 esM.�.°w•fial '° • I ' i ataf.�D' 1 ^ts^-�: '.. I ♦ rmt r,, I I, w 'Y a:oa t 1 w.raamr�s- sassy ................ _ some or G.�8T8 mmleseanr•raa.re TlliACT IN THE,CITY/OF RAN034 CUCAMONGA.CAUFOMNIA 'm,m lo,!a.m r a mars a Rn•,mfry a'lm,.v•cease•u.xrmtnr a mac. aam r aw•. . :.."w•dmYala.L[8,OL9L.:L+mm:••A.�OrI,C,aL AV ffIDp.f00�•1',0 Rtl SLlalm®.tm 1011 .e a auom snesm n.•a:a•a,a urm o m mon,a+'.•.,m sx armors®a em r^�a�i aaia . s w amue•r* sr a o !r !•,r.n mx ti r ,.orrscw, La6�iL'i�'moav� canb.asesaAe• o.ar _ �.� MM'17.OY'W �MIlm••I� 8!!!.•m• � .'i%!®OYMWD t I I •. CTIg. YCA YtIIpV'CtC:rpi•11 W •.y ••\ �oHa'''d uY t - t& •! a• �• „- I 8v p� •• m _5a Ice .•.' a, #$ ?g Y a&L a d8 ai jrw-.z I Y A Y�A ms y •�•j � �+ '• . � _� .:�� }�$�'sa• rows• ." �• !. - •� s� a■ ; as s; a� o r tr ` w w so aio�. em a I e•-. ems .. •s ,w n $. a� a� '�3••m®as�ewwr 106 Y (}-mare,aaoa' r:.1a•.m.n• •� �•---• � § (.},—.ara•rR.s• r.m ace• m•rao^ 4eoi®s. !1 :.� � E'a �a�od t•ar assn• ra• e J ii AyltsY Omd".•6A• M.ffi ,,. �S It ' •S �cta•r!•maid s[A• n.m• deo+s�.emw msEa• mod �• e • r� r • • o a �(r+„-•rv,••m• •swc ancv oer " —.erorar reeao• Imvr� 3 "War ' .... �._u•re'a•nod�aa•.ra• I w'r •em,.wnr Hart.• — I ^� rat •co,v I t ras.ea•I,� �:. I� �I' aaeun r.en, q esffe�tffa lea TRACT NO. 116 6 •:i umo ta-IN Wg CM OF ANC v0tae u MCMIONGA.foie V IS I.reme. +i w fWufin aavftu.A910e9 fo fee WPSCitt IefTfeOIpl.fef@feQ eta fY.f nifine>ffe eafe ." \tV 4I®f}RRfAlfYfiP niie tJJ@ Qa fn n..A.fifty®et temunfa a A tflfn 0I clegilnLO W W tlW10 • mee of fe 0 fes t�eff'u.iffe if 6fd fu6 ffta 3.tefxeiae�{A'AtlPe m"'rvt°".'!'eus��"'Sfnw.�+`�e`!st'»w.vwaw3a,sn�s+aav0wct,t�vsgsi.rsou�mts.�en, M te•.n'p0•w. Garrc meaty eefowptvto�iRaM�-.� �� " _ w nma awuwa.snugasa.' v cer ;e• • ' ' r-�ttrg .� I last"! •: ij ,J L.,w•�..... r f ao 6 ms J i� e rr Ph • r � d te.,!►�. y� 5J. E4 A it 3. •b e1CJ•y Qt e®'�i'181 pie• EaO• Ib�gy %f0� 'j �"H�•®Mffi•:. U0• OiO' Dili YB {Q ��elYe'eD'• ICAeA' Te tAA' �f0" �+ 'fo' ow. mw' weal C.,1-..�EDtfe wwft. eeeaM �wv wsr U >+ colts•. _ f x ewe Y no � �• -,�i �- ate• "9 �HwW ties J7 se •fRY W 4 R..A _6 MG.,fail::.• 1 W' '�i.N IA1/e0•.A .9 �� M « ts9,r ,f9,• j' TRACT NO. 11626 DTA T CM it DDRPDCno COCAb6MA r.AB.i1oD�Ne� '11IY6 t0f•1 Ra J @ riL'lIv ll.VO A MRw p i01 1.d•tRial ll.'IIfOSLb i Osn...LL®�Ym..w nneaom Fvmur.�s4�nr vt:sac nm raa®r tearraa rn cm amr l m sae•orcr I.Ulm a m u+®moza••ateaaa um�m�aeon.rru�ta m FemaFarmo.w ne ow�tvaaaewrFae�m w tat•rmm¢-m.•CLfIRIo tis!�mom�*+G,+.�at�ei �ergtlafp —�. fiM•tT qf•v etnoawaoaw�a,a. r .•_. erar•oar srr our,. d .$ .fe S ir.✓tlaaAars mv'' -dner'md'Agtl aF,r• L07:il• \aaaa•aatp�ara• B'NaV rsm'N! , d�'Ma•rrd •pm,.e•y afd,AV ffi.6QC Ac6�' `••�/ �• m'OV'st✓,!1/'6W Lti!d aaa!A]O'dal' •`�• a/of iY slY —'� lSPlr'86/e/' �' Pao•aad nA w"" � �y IN .`\• I a•ataln,salt• ` rat Ja``�?��\\• `' ''!. <\ •�� ��-• •`•f e�� •�� d.\a, \� .��J III ai ,4 a•. w a•im•.o•r tamr r � -D��,. t — a�•uue raFmi / .�rs� _..— r+_tm•sr•r ra�a� 1 3 •m uauw.�o•oss n 741 a i 6TR8tLT ^-• VAMVIT � � r • a lk TI-L ��.:�������� '��, ` ''e'er..�'`�•;• � <.�-.� 1p' 1 J •� Q f 17 77 7-1 IN i Jll � �:�-��. ►ram - MAI 40 W: WME `� ii/S► ' t�PAWMIMz brie..•--all « ALIT iiv .✓ ` +�' 1 •- �� ';� lily. � �-�; . ter ��r���► �\�V\f• owl . ► R. I1 �i I ..•ice•-:a �v:..._......_ �' -11 � sa'`-''..ems '��.ro.�.ei.w�e_-���'"' ,�''y�,,�r►r.., aw LM flow 1� 2 •. .mil t.. ... _1 _ �►.'� -"`-- err Ate..._ ��. tie 1 _� "\• r�,v !till r ! to -� ���° ; =c .;)�:,ems �;, xr>E '$ !�'t// , ,•1- e • { `y \\ \� ♦� ` '� JJJCCC h r R ice. '��^�� \ �_, \'\ j � t •.� ,�♦``'� �'`��� r i' t�t �• � � �,..,1 t j tj• i M 41, 11 tj ` i F `i Z i'! '•.1dg� =r 0 4 i�,t..,\ •:-� 1• �iS. �C? � .�x = 3 \ � � �', it� \ �\•�' 't _ ti b"C � C a��� Ile � ', 'i' '�"A' t a�Y,t�� i � '•� t\ _ \. a �l i �•d'd t : i k v,r � J '33�di '.^emu--..\: ..•�".. _ _ ''�� s < 4I C Ni (i x • =� � Yy� .`'.,, .sir s ..�•ze _tG'sfi_,t I �0 .+� .. •was I ___ �S � / �� � y.0 b� �. `� �` •� .�' _+^ •,. _.fit AM 1 E 1 1 j2 f _ w _ _fitS I'll VA � O _ � a Y \\ 1 t 2 .r �� 1 ` ♦ ill WL ` yS 1 1� s - x�°. ��L•�.o Mill ell 29-1,All alUidt f.' jai 11 t 4 zp� t a f a� F ti I.�Y � t 4t ) Z 1 �s rr A Aix 1 �r� ^• 1 1 1 1 .. oS l _ Q x r I SL ot 11 INN '���11!14,11}#t��I Ai J�+' , i�/� tzi .a, dui. ,9 } wi;��l)�✓�i�`, b� ,�,.����,�4� �. tr i S' r (, pit _ n I G I AIM wn 1'4"rr t THISs PA6E 114E1T%Ol9ALLY:LEFT•BLAF9R f _ 4 � 7 1 .sue a t •+Fy .5tN1r+ S•1 ^�* T r °4 C i C7A r ° tl 4e yr d'n—,•L[. � ' � BIER •�_ �r -E---+ i�■R } t� .+ �/dill i �,.� � i ri�a � `:h•..�(—,,CIF ''(IIti1► � Ali ��' s �; fa JAIM re .p: It a CEl dx r.c fir , r inMill 8c ��1�p=7� 1p' ■ rr 'r r' lie .. Ire [� �: ,KG}a�•.u�� •F i!ta s= fills , _jj11 1 \LI P,- f a t� , it, Ya�t•i� , �s �niu��rt� � ��=fir' '�"� +I)��p��. ��1'�i�<< ���:;� �'q ./: ■�� �:� Q (rRRlu nC, Bill aq e ► f i IIfni �.. N. IZI 71 f 1 ,,.'Win } i +AM it 1 I �rr� wy �i toe }� cn ,y'i` l aaaaaar � ■ l � >o � i MCa.,•�� a .tt a rr.:ir� �f :e � 7r i ��,r�t • rn� 1� 77-1 — r ■ter :i�i f �4it j is 1 _ r, f ter" r r� �� �- � �L�� i�f-�./r-•�� {ate:- 7x`�� �.1���«j (_� � �IU�■�t a {=' ®�� .ors �:.�\' tiir�s�, �• rr. yy..uw■tea � a��U .w��s rt a r4J z Al 4 IF s 1 r r s r _iwryy�mow-,ILMOIL � 6 � �11) 1 e ; Q1 1 (�' �x 1 41`r• Ft «4 M a 7 r 1 S ��r j 11 �•�� l.__,-9 S -] 'lam R hIlm� AA VIAT PT 1 ► f IN=! r, 'r .�k �Nrajr_ �a'it l i7TTr-1� .� t■ - r r r ss 1 L` �'�*�E �. �•, k. 1�]::���It(�{.�i�l4pjt�f.�ls i se�: a �. nil IL Y t all EMMONS Ph sail Cl'ri�'t�I`A' Ilellll •;i�•;, ., all■;ii�,■ �� sit imp- 110WIN[ 4110 ®'�II�J/� rS' '�q asF'. w` ��•'� , sip tiAwmw Yi� FW R�lk * � • �Y4 `�� 19aii wpm �. lI ■ . ��. �" .ni F a�j s �I 3 •:' ■!4`�� � 1�a ins t..l vll ffs ills Mt A IW i t" I�Y.ti � rft l` NL1C t t 16 ME (P e t 1,4 i 41 i � I i ry 1 r IE h -T�` �• I � z' may+,[,. 1+, S t yy � 1 � • ! a�;\� �� ` �� 1'r�.. s � ZEE v ty 4 i � �;' 1 ► x' e %,� k x 1 ��� a� � 1\F a'\ 1�`v r: e►9 t �l*ys[ v's 3 .,fir M 7 „��'k � i,♦ ,air,'e`r7'". -� ,-p ,� .7 rt � ''3 �vh '9'' .s• 1 a '� 4' ► �Y� i•7D ' 3�d'ai� � •,t. •'t>. t°�t�f can + � �}J .�.�. r i :1 r I ■ ,.• a s Z I �Fa plo �41x 11 rE> too It vz ILI x Ii 1 t. (. � Y i t�•1 4 t L x r � M let .� e- t; 1 IS r#` 'Vfi13' � �''►} R [ �r • Fs� f a a. 'a e �� � �■ t �� � � �.�rH YET-..'.,,�`n.._' "}""I rr� r �i"�, � ad#���� �� `�`�It������t`� }�a pu'.�.r. �1�I} �• �ilfr � Ir. -•r f � rr t�. g��M � K ski ' 4�1�'�Ii l4 r ■ Ul • :Simi-19 - . Jim i - E d -i, 1 t� 1 i Ip 111 77 ��...:s u.,'.:� �-7It ■!,> e�il)Y'�p�t fY�Y1�1 r1! t �';; �tjC}{{ .7i311rtljY//' 6Ua ll l� t 1 1 r •���jllY r ` �tf'1■fit` ) t,- • Le l q 1� .• I� •'-1�i: �� )fit'► til�= ah��r�ri e= �' �, ,irk`► ,. �1,L��; f. 7 it �! �■ v . JIM Pf E k iii[,► ��R` �� '■AAA. �` a.A' j� ��■ -�K .��.._,�,,:.�:�..�k> "z 1 y e r ryyV�.�1 1' �• 'i �f- r�Y 1� �i��,F'�"CY- wry �� �• z rZ 1{ 1 f1 G� � t f �� vt all � P ta.r.r,' r a rir ��v�e Iti INO �+tjig II it e mod' r R 1 ;Irk -�--1 t�.yy + will. a tUt i �0i �x si Vi ilia i cgs; SIT Vol VIN � t 1.f r a■1,1��( •`i'- tg�,y`+«' � �` .���'�,C.■ ,i it 4�, .,, 1 . r r i< 4�t� n t4 sa1q t 4 c �S aLYA �1N� •rt��ti !!fir fit,. rY, +J. �1 t . � 1 ! h� y r � 1 ` LOIN! ��• -y• , { �',. � Y� I {1 f1 1 41 _pr 21 tt aw 1 a. ■ S5 S CSC. a / Ai,'f�•�I er R Si} An' r '- ,iy ■s� - ��5 [ RAF- Y■ Nil Nil ISA is r is T*c,, .41U itsI't i ::xx: V� Itls} _. r a as y I i SriG. 1 Y7,'1��q ltr��,r����" ry ■� t +��u 7oP IMWk NR 144 4t ' i C� r 1� %�► CCU ��� .�'' sue' � � ►� �! A ; 11"PRII!M51�. R � li ! R"!n z• x[I *hest,M {' r � -quips NO i - g. All rr . rr+t 4" q�: � 1� �r 717 v + 4 J r"` .1.t�1'��;�r ., �ta�� �';._ t�Jw��6j p^}y f �■attwl�r 1'3�'. yyV-i-,J1.►'p �� �f!��gEf� :1 .�w'' •�LY�'� ��• r` � � '�` L i� rN IT [� s tit 011'i''I R r . --�{)�':.:� owl ,ti`, �-• ,}�., ... t( ■ I sti y -, ,ai�ti�tr%'Pi r� i,'•"..a .�PII,� ,+i, :t�I,!j����;'c� 1 i 4 Y �:.,. -1Ill�■t 7 ��, !. � 1 1� - � 1i11 117 �_�yl •. �: -J �Ij t IIx-1�I�} .�4`�I .� 1��, �' ,��',��■ �-, jell, t J i� �� i } G * rF a fvR yt■Fit tip; ; FA ,2 374 t��o C ' Ir t.` ri� ` t. r. 1 �!� ��' -`a�f�t '!✓ a�AM■.Am ►tt.. I`+ As 4 NJ .rya I K ail# 7■�� , r y , 5 ':; q 1 ■ �+�I � it �". ys, YI��Cb a Y v 104 ffn Mlif ■ 1' lit < �.r �wr t 'r4: XW •'•• j � ,f� '■ �' `�, j �i�' Ir fat.; ■',�� M}� 1 I' W�,. it e r y 51; Ili IP , +r rei3O +.rr� rii ,5J1 rl*s�'.I<�'>tlij'��r5r' l i i j���'� iL��+.irl �' �►�ji��it :+�'tt a�.i��a l�;�,'!�!'� .+�. 4 `*K t� "►�'� ®�r"�F�r � �L�t der c Ins t, t c ►� AVIV `' �lL;�� ]r;► 't a�ca � �1-.7..� � ate, F. r NOW It ago �� �EaY%�i � vs I � .� r 1•S ,�.- 1; G4mnmv' ��E�e�� � t �r ••vr�''l���I 3 �'�1�1� T� +,- I�I��^`� � W,� •�11�.1��1�11� �I�_i��h�`'����i�'�d3 js. 4��fi� •�� i t a ,''j���l{�1 4, �' �•4� �'� .� � r 11 � •IK] 4�� �S1��s 7�: r •� ,g4 t f _ 7, low Ni i C ■tj lgi JU '. IAA 7� � J raj � 1`�Il�tn 4r' �; ;■'! tl ,t�l �� ,�� '^fit' 1t �. � yy a NEW 1I 1 l�vh <� j, ^ d � p� '' III ��+�� r',�.�wlf {t��■ 'r. • .r� � r a a �+� 1 .� ,t � •r'1a�S�rr�<..��`fit {t�tlL,. a♦� }. Mo Fix -!, 1 1 ��'�i.:w� r s t ..t. (���..� ia�ai � �II�• t t �. may.._��,� ':y yr+tt+•i ��N r+ � y 1 t•v gav a s -�C 1 }� r z � 1 III�■!�` 3 F p. (� 1 1.. `A3 }..� }c 4 4"� �,��` ,_.~ l"^� It ♦ t". " 1} �y k� r 1 T t. •, k �ry�N {. � u.�'Zt'si I�.Y■ 1 ®~i 7,7 4 � ,A -f-j �••JI ►>i:�,� ,, elf , ,e;_ AV a.a r� 3 ■ r "=" eel i�� , `i�t l�' ' •"'� � It�� �, � t 3 , >• j .. ► ' ti } E.. � Of Yr� !tip i �t]f`i 4 7 1 fill. TI . ��`� ■II��.�� _ Jam. � �+ ., ., f t 1_ etl� Wall - P x; { _ � •i ,��! �■ 4�;!tE �fir, �, x�. n !" v` 7 ttt, r y,tI■i Z • Nis jig 81 It —��NMI � Rri .AFTV All- I.;X'R: lilt fie, =�i': �� ��; �. '�';h' T � �1� •��: _ ; t .,,fir ', �zr .� �, •� �', s• t� r•^ � ■4{Ata� LWIPJ J c ! 1—Us jz ,Y , '` ��� + ,, .;�s* ,tr FIB• 'al �;� a �r f '�', art--•. �'. ail jj1.4HH z. I , �`�1(11f11af11.�� MUM {F I�� 1. EF raa Ga��� ■■■r..■■r .ram a■•... �► ��■ u.Y it ��r�l�ar l��l��� - rT j:.r.■■ •r y� ;III■/■..f � ■t■R....-T�l ��, � '�r. M�I .0 ra. rs.s'y-'� '. ►� ,n, rr___a1. _ ..l■lam. -.��5 iu r6(, •�Via•■ ■u�u.Mu.it O y 1�1• 1.r � 1 � 111111� I ��■ Q .:• :` �1:YYY■.■rlt Yrt ■ *� r■v,,y~Ill r":��II. �:Y•.j...r■■t■Yr f►■1 a■■I-..■ram \ �� wi ■ua■■rR ■�.Y��f V afro ■ a■.raw■ .�. {■rn I.. ��aiaaau■a�■assY■s.�I T •h:� ■ u■■r■ ■ +.K■ ■ rr■ ■ ■►.r U,. � ter: u� ■ :ay_w:I f rA • t` filly .tee <,�. �• 4 W it • o a IWlr. , it ,4. I s • — 1 s IWia► 71 rrEW2 ItCo OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA wr PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBrr: SCALE: c 1 la+ +w h K to a •,,ar, � � k � `i• ����, R k ` -s b .:� � t :.r �-k., CrJ'`� �. � �+ 4�§^ter. t r � ♦ v n /�fl Vey♦j•Y j♦ye y,\( `�r�' .. r♦/;i��♦�j•j. e��eye I�T �\ ' t '� 4 ��s �Wyse ♦ kGl} /`i t� ♦��}♦�r♦e♦Y•may♦.: � `. `!�*�•�♦ems♦� � � _ �:� dp t�� Y E f t� k �F �i �5 7�1 kr � � '9`. �' 'Y` 'Y` "f`.''[` �ri �•:T � � ��y T.,:�P�,•�i` "�`�i�L � !T �,� � T ' o --,,I c c il RE,: T 0,v l C,O.RR €Y i fd . 3' a ram} c �;• �. �� �� � rill#fllill((IIF �c,■ram'•■ ■■ ■r y�r _► �. �. `e rr`C■rr. i� ut �.Y (� ■■ ■u ■■r■r+ a �+ arEli— Y` ■ram■� t Ill� •.j, J ism 'R: • � ' � i�����'11 � �. ter- u■ow■rrrn ■ u■.ra^t ti11_ � _ rF. ■ • r■wr r■ '�{(yy •� F Cok f t illill aim + R ■i■ .l ' r ..■■(.■�itr■ ■M ■ . Ri Ob ww�. .■.. r C■ .. ■r■ ��.rr ■I • IT rM�r �� �,�_ _. _ r ,.. �: p rk��rfwrri= _... _ _ .__ _,.. :a a � ♦��� iyii' �.tai° I a aau` r,ar�' �e�i � { asps: �safs �s. �{ i, 1 � a^'�— s ,___. .. , .gin :._. � �� rw._ �=• �;... �=., r� a: 4 � >:0`.� „YeY�l�t O'. Ct aattat eattn .,.�I tRltt'�I �, L�:1 �. 7!��rha tic+.: �. :. -r _= n ��ic r a .® ._� L_' f.s� .. '' i r- ', ' e �� "^ 'x� ��. �. ..r.. rw;.�. .�::�r I1Gl .1 _..—: .. _ ."� """:: � a 11' ;� { r 'Yl 77 I Ull s club � LEFT nw-VATM -.qq 1 MO atr as•se - lf•l�� bl^, Js ■ e .� ^N YIMNai '• �0 $ Ror%.!T ELEVATION OF FAIITCI-LO . UCAIVIONGA ITENt: PLANNING DIVISION T1;7.E: a � ; EXHIBIT: �� SCALE• --"' �k n — r fG+�Jy v �Y YY\itY{ \ ICI it 1� Ila y ^ lY .. .. ���.. -max'...-.... .'^.,.. d A i� '- 11 r . cy'ws s ' ■t ,ozp;�hu� _ 11 MNw'a ea FP 3! 9 rt a� Rr�•at ' -' f®rs 7ns� wesa aaKa y 1 ri lu-NE mom now a I! JIM" vmw ................. Mums FV T'Vlz� . t LL . . ssaa • T REVATIOiN " �ma ���( RK.HT LLIVATKM Agri. - PPEM: 'L OF RF,NCI-IG Ct3CAT/fONCA TITLE:' ION P1, NINE DSIIS �N ,, r EXHIBIT• S�AI.E: ,: { w 113 ��- 1LL LfdS r I 1 -�: HUM RlGFfT' ftElATiON f � — - Aft rrEr : o Ci1Y © RANCHO. CUC"11ONGA T. TITLE: PLE�NI�JI "C: OIISIO3�T �t q E7¢IIE31T: R SCALE: r a ._x. ru Fr. aa__ Lui LEVY ELEVATION ..wr M % ili • t7t,lLd tw, .. = RANCHU CI C".' .VGA TZ t F . ;,VNING DMSION ►► �� } r M; s� ■sta • ® to■■ test i u i Um tad aaat s� as • � 1 4. ra _ -fill ,� � .� ® 10 y I NT' ELEVATION ra -- . ... V.. .N 3 � -•7 Ili ; � � '1' e n. RIGHT EIEVAtKNi 3 1 v OF RANCHO CUCAI4SONGA ' Tri'i.E PLANNING DIVISION sy. 77 •fir EEFT itEVATIOM 2RE:Z77 LIM "_ Ie RG.�.•aerf.._... _ RKi1T_ELHY1TI�t — s gTE1Vg; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIV°t NGA, 'FI''[.E: �� u PLANNING DIVISION EXYy rr.- l� ,SCALE: M -70 w Ti "IV ELEVATR?N � ^+— , err�a.lri M—M Iy _ - RIMT REVATM 1, RA ..IITCHC� CY3C#4L'Yf�l��xe-c �EXriI3Ff P �„ �� �1 r • x4 t� C 1.. (, MltlatC: 1 'L..,rL 1L+L ��.LLJ El MM .. CF.tR2�� i -�t.►.�rP G _. L 81Wf6•r f^rY1. p L•tw` t9 jc r«rat•n. --_• - ':"'��::' ,t". `a'Lm.�.r..�nYis' OF'RANCHO cucA� �vi NOA ITEM: f 'TiTIEr N rim_'"r• ; v.��z ;4 f LE EMI Mai LEFT E lit EYAT!13fd a �— . �., i,-' ,,,/ ,•'• �... ems• auy . II � T r�"BII..I' i• q y •� i yt ItWM7 EIEYATiON rrEm OF,RANCHO �.[rca ic�NGA rrt. 2� . �'T.A�I'I�EING i3i'tII�F�3I� 41 Eh TT. Via( SCALE,: f ,13 r- b' K --ey r t� fr �► , _ _ r LEFT awAmm ' ���"""�r►.�' -�4(ws tier uaw IL Ti 0 LOU— rd ASR .r ,,.... �..-.ram'^. TPEm:. ct of:RANcHO CTJC ODTGA ME ,, PA 14 r r.� rjl fit' i�'� O1 ,1' ql�I/� � ® ��• �_�.� - tlay J- �tl'y j� LIM I I •tart j� r^Dh LL T ELEVAT 1 asa° 's Ls� s��a-rsss--v �^ .mew Is•to 46.0 ELD, ri•. /(r IMM EIEVATMAr ISO' CUC ONGt T1Tt; i 1'LANMNG DIVI,�IZ3N EXITT;,I �(QlSCALE: _�'-Ra•sa 1 _ i _ wr eea q. J� r ; ILUTaREVATIb •gee _ 1, sa ✓ ana. r rA Rr i g yyN 7/ /!e rimmd7� CITY Ot` RANCHO CU AMONGA PI.t IV,iIIIIQIG TITS. ``II N EXMIT."�11`l�rC1�LF- J\ �, rI-T ':,Fsd* AXIM-1 trsr w. a:•' IL ? 'T rlap aJ Wa. h + �• -- '•y�.'i� Q Pti M�HT .LEVATON d 'r QF I2ETI30 CL? A1aIO1GA j TSE*if: �4 ... . TITLE: i� i � 11 PLANL?iNG DIVISIQ_ t � N� 1:. 1� i Lr V, �r EllPf.E70 T ELF.VATM is .area. i ( t w Il'Win. i 'RWA4T FINATI+DN I' .':f a«.+ •.�,�;, U�Yi�tlltk U!,(�tL CITY OF RANCHO' CU( AMONGA N.t _ � rT PI6A11T11tIMI DIVhV SIOi TTTLE: EXHIBIT: � �� SC! I C ►r a .,� aalsh,+++r ur y 4 Oct' rrr�nr . .a r r IA- M-o 31 . i.M an- at IiYb /Q *} �i '- ry} l�eeaa �M � A� uu 1 t � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMi`,,.)NGf3 TTrLE•� AMR&617P AeHj "��� MAN��IN ;�I�7I k N Ex mrr t1!�' .I scA : 4� ��. �i ' _�� — _ .. n i�+i r/ ..., .. .ri.� c� cis a�� ■a _,! a a s u-.— U U !� �w 'w lii'. it ,� � . ��p�Gfi7 fig �_ �Iia� I _.: .�. �« '� � y� © ® ® �� . ,. 1 A 11 4... v II �. ...�'ate. �rr��Ir+r�r 4,.,r —� -- - �-�. �.�. --�, 1 � �: h ____. .:.r a •- w ':...... . t' ,�� � ,,� � a A, � ;� r..-�. a �k , S i� sly � L:_�. — irl ■ milt Nunn Nunn itsai1ia ti� �' ••a y R • .i5 `.rt ._��: it oil III I 10i i Qw ma ,/ it CITY OF �I��Y;ONGA I'L�AL -v i fitP � IbPJ �tfftt pS �� EXHIBrmr. 19.:' : NUNN I c aJim 71 �1 ff -oft a r ._ ®. , q�0�. 1! fi ■GYM l�! � _ . - j�.��. �. �.-- �. b t I�} �� ■ hi �� n ,0� �- ",�� i �� s. �, ® � � �. I � � ®/ / �.. f.; a: �. .. � � rr ,. = .. . - r F � - a n *y ■l, ■O Illlt�ljllllll� ��-�.. i 1 x�t n - r, ve h -�' POW I® fit•I-"" r Am fi i.. rod 111 1 tETELEVAYtt7tJ . + atra®®aims aa�ama�e Loj -44 to ar h _ M a 0 4�•t w a 1 pryay_g�` a 8$ p�4�.fA�' is iwL'El6'�'lALaf'�.Y.R'V, 1l l.T.r171.- ✓• .. 1 ii y I-N rr : D i` +��� Esa�r: �' sc : I^C iee ..l tun WON .: - -.• ester. �._. �. �� ;�is; srr �1 .�!. lF+• all ire tr1 ® � 'ayrg r;r .r rrrrr tr • � 1 IIc 1: C u ��� �� Irji I ® - ;h. r c �e. � ,�i , air �wu _ �nr errs — a ,. ' �q� —_ ,, � '-� ® �7 Ate' _ _�-__.` _ _ ._,.__ z, �. !�l �.;� �#. u� � ! � � s_ 1! ■ ■ _ 3 . ® _. , . i { (! . �. ; - i � w J�1'— Imo• _. ,�`-- _— a•� � _ I LFFT ELEVATIOAi r . II Na ' P .••,ram RIGHT'ELEVATICIN •'� e Cltf OF f U C I C.4R+IOle1�i FE! IOI� rr. I)JI��SCALE: "'� .• n n idea iman' e _1..,__-...,....,_�,._ ,,._.__..__:_...�....__... __,-..... --.`...:.fir •.-���..�.�®® 1 ..,: Fy' Mb w rM � rl Ys AS �r d -_ ••� -!am* VAR MY IIEVAIKW _ .. .,.. '__ .._..r.-•e dai�i Mali tL— r -I AM tot- RKW EIEVA Y ny C?F" LI f3NGt� PtEM: v�{. t,9' E TT:C�;' SCALE: DEU PID'. MY ELEVATION s 1 's Lul r« _F L. 1 j RI211 ELEVATION ' ..'gin. a.u....• i I I ,I 1 i i MY OF LlCAriiONGA i i�11j iid' 10 , p %�. as D 1T ++ 3;. - +AM + =Oi w "T EMAT 1 ID � iaZ �l Mqp of ���clY ITY OF UCAMONG� t�1►s' �t r� 0 rr. �bSCAIS: 77 (A i$aEVELOPME?tT e -✓OF CAUFORNiA,INC. 1m3 esr vas".°aq a ' Cow:a ca.rpeu9i7Sa r.y '. �U..vrsszssai.A'er%i7fib5 s•er p4z•u April ,17, 1990 Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga c/o Mr. 'Tom Grahn . P.O. Box 307 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Planning Commissioners,: We, H&S Development, are- appealing to you. for a :variance on out project. We started our design work'back' in September before the hillside: ordinance was,passedand'after,our original submittal:' staff made us aware of k�,;e new forthcoming standards. From that' period an, we have conci.nually'reworked and upgradedl,our 'homes to staff suggestions. ; We have tried,'to meet all design comments and standards of the hillside ordinance, as well ,as the,staff's .recomendritions. We are very pleased with the houses that have been designed from a team consisting of your staff members and ours. Eve,t though the planning departmentrs staff,. l believe, will be recommending a denial of the variance for which We have applied; they know the difficulty- and, hardship this project'- has ' encountered thus far in order to even meet the standards that we. have met. We have dropped floors in 'rooms, lowered roofs, " moved around rooms,' and omitted spaces iti many different areas of the homes in order to meet the ordinance. .It would be absolutely impossible to perform any more changes without."making the `homes' impratical in their function and flow, We will be selling these hones in competition against the . surrounding. custom homes, which 'didL not 'need to-- meet . the requirements we did. If our floor plans are not functional we will be at an extreme disadvantage. • 'rJ Planning Commission Mr. TOM Grahn 5.' Page Two s- The difficulty in adhersing completely to the 'ordinance arises when yc,u try to lay out A' floor plan of a-large house within a building envelope whose dimensions are based upon side yard � setbacks which limit the width and height. since our, lots were a.. approved in 1983 under guidelines which allowed narrower lots, •s and it is our belief that these same standards would not. be approvable today under the objective of the hillside ordinance, we are forced to dean with an unusual set of circumstances which' posed an extreme challenge. The task would have been easy it we were building smaller homes. We have designed them to be as nerrow° and long as practical in order to fit within the envelope and anything deeper would be unfunctional.. since our lots are north-sbttth sloping-:the deeper the design the more grading that is'necessary, so g4t. caught J between the grading issue and the building anvelope. We have worked with staff in order to best reach an equilibrium between the literal interpretation of the codes and their intent, We are already limited in size because of the envelope, but this Area commands the largest homes .in the area. The majority of our custom built neighbors are larger. This area of Raxigha.Cucamonga E has became one of the most sought after areas in the Inland Empire, and thus land value's reflect this. In order to obtain a value on our Homes whi.ch. is in proportion to the hand cost we had . to maintain the, lazge footage already established in the area surrounding our lots. We believe the intent .of the coda was to pvevent the cutting and filling of the hillside which was breat:ng large flat pads with box like 'souses. We believe that we have met the intent of the code, >the variance ve need is only allowing our house« to exceed. the building envelope at the rear,of our 'homes. Each area. that exceeds the envelope has 'been thouroughly reveivend nmd, can not be changed further without jeopardizing ibe .floor plan and the quality of the house. Z ask, that you review the elevations in relation to where the variances are applicable and 1 think you will see that the elevations are not too imposing from any view especially when looking towards the house from the street. Again, since we are the lastof the houses to Yoe built in this area, with lots of these dimensions, l do nott see how the gratting of a variance could be viewed as a aspecial priviledge to us, ` 'we, have had to deal with a hardship which the other builders the in area have not. y b. e Planning commission Mr. Tom-Grahn Page Three I personally had my doubts when the ordinance " was being formulated, but, After I many;revisions.to meet. the >ne,4 standards we have begun tr unclerstanc:: I a�n proud of:the" houses we have designed. The end'`tesult, we 'feel, is better than the . .original housiO we submitted; ,$�zch 'now obviously shows the.merits of`: :the ordinance. I -appreciate your taking the time to`,teView ouii,circum"stance,` shd respectfully request your approval. Sincerely, Je rey, S. Burum Vice President JSB/cem � a yr i C I rep C 7, J 4 �11111i�!! . r 71Utpk��0 h+At�t(ylXh p � !dolt i 1 1 r r rr a w tic��' r s'' • } EM �� wow - �,-ems %. V _ — � _ —� — � — d�.yp iVap► r REAM ELEVATMI 9" yam^ � 1 � NOn�Yo •_i!} (ll - �3 01 (#J' — tr' p►n$ wo u! _. 14.. Indicates the portion of the strue nre exceeding the �nYldang envelope. MY of RANCHO CUCAMzONGA Y1�P►i�fhING"DIVISION 11 ia` Ixmr 2.SCALE: ��j� r• ��_;�"°y4.`..,.:� �_moo.w �� . ir Ln A REAR ELEVATKtM AA 61� i tl4� L .. { • 'M' r_ t== O =3 FRONT ELEVATKIAt': _ f' Indicates the portion of the structure exceeding the buildih$ envelope. OF,RANCK0 CUCAMOiV1GA PLANNING 'n�iSiC31'd 'FI'ILE VAryy�tO. .i Lot �; :,: r - ft.'d.Moss gmg M J; in ■� �( ''��. r� ® s �. ®�. ®gas f ■.ta t■ d� r ,y � ear�sswo (mil } yrI M1 �� to■qre�� fit' 1 c pee�ee 11 ■ '_s —�� ...�� ...any AA•• .�eie`�. i !1� ® ■�' ® �a� j w. wee 1 __■ �.�.� .o ■■ ■ �. to s,%/ - -- i 11 - P Poo- �. REAR ELEVADON 9 as„•r� ���sa� (0 !E] ' r d '! F6 6&26 tau T REVAMN Indicates tad portion of the structure exceeding the building envelope. f. CITY QF" RANCHO CUCAMONGA �lvt PL�4.I KING �I'SION 'rrrl. : -0�, �,fi Ir E3 Bl'I wi(p SCALE., "�'"" 4.ti H Jim t,.. � .at.. chit Y 44iaii n. lRROMPAINIE ;� = 4i� /�Y ■ I"� Ili ' r�.�4 , / +i i+ Y'n SY:Ar°'fi. h ( `T: i t s �'L�_ —...�■..� _. dam=- = ,- _` low El 00 now -� — a utw ■■ �� �` arr � rra.� � s rrsr.ros.+r.� r T� n ''� .� il�a�ti#uea��(�i etnr�lllrrda, it n S _ ♦s ' C n r�r�r I♦ 4.�; i�s � �rrR � rer r♦ �� • n c� =f raster■= �IIr tr '�!y . ■r sr �� �s�ti. f I ■ r1 t y LM Ills will most is as is ... ... qua. t INNA u =a ttttr �■■ur_ a ttttr.I ,�,= �t---— y.� �. ins"610 1}+,�. • >r a �� ter. rr � ��� ril ,,� � � ��. �� u c _� _ � ��� I i �. ® it 11 { _� 1 ��'��fi�l�r,{tlAi �d�l.��p 1'f�'c t; � a '�x`R'a�t r.{:,�� � _ .. . .. n �. =, .ql _�� ,.. ,� .,ofi� .., t n Vo r +s� si�iiE(� iii( �5 'LiOad f1 .■.. I I F t �' ■ ura �_ �.�: f �. •: "V A � � � �. � �,, ; � tv: �.:. S 7r y •BY 4 F^ —O =i r " « N RFt R ELEVATION ' AMk 12` R m + �� m `. FL n FROND TFEVATD[9N Indicates the gore-on of the structure exceeding the building envelope. OF RANCHOCUCAMsJr1GA ITEtvt:.�- PLANNING DIVISION � fl 6-r----. N � EXH rnI (V SCALE: �. i, ,I. 4 y.... � 4� k���I��lUlllll, ti _;,. };' rrei �o `?• y - Y t l- ��. ` `r■ri�> '�f��; �> _ �' � ■rra" ,� ,„: �' 'h�� u `,. .•� "� � ,.. 1 �' { � �,: _ �,� " �',3 ®�; ri �, _ i- _ _ _ _ ,. ,. �� *■■ :: �� � � �, � _ � , �,� — ,.: l �., ..� t 1=.�®� _ � � �� .: a � � � .� s _1� �� � ; �. JA , q C � 1 1 +. 'II 747 �s LIM El, S � u y . _ .. , 1���11_Ili�blll y� �., °r �:� �' ,:. t,� tl��I'Ilf� ;, x e }' :( 3 J �® _, �' � � . . tii. r ��. . .... ,,; v .. � � srur'�lr� e .,.. .: � ,. III �:"' s'. 1fi a i� r�,����'i. .1 t,, !� [� i �..... i _ � _.... ,. ...._ .. .... 'Y y: �� '�li _: "w .�"'�.,.. „y � �� Y � _, ', u��� 7 l O �. h _ - �. � r 6 n* _ $ily� �. �tttf�rr,�rlirtt �,, �,ifrtit�if��a l� 1 'i o. ��1 Y F .._. ��� ire {j ; ���, �. ��� _� ,. ��r� u � � irk .� �_ �►.� w� i �. .. w I��d�r. . � : .. ..: � . ,_ � _ .: _ A _ d :t .'i 4 a ._ i _._ � a �, �,���� _ s O ti®el�el �: 1 ., 1 +■■■ 1 �- `� i+V - �, - �� �y� 1 r' ``;; � d 1 h' s i • �F{. �r �.... �� N y,r? ttom��� j.v m lip 4 1 t �'T "R;a . a F"� t � Xl . �.it i If �i ,:. .fir :�. • i f Li 00 ib ilia e x z i VAPJANQ LOTS 11;F1`!LFYA'1'IW ELM #31 N to�*- 10,:Plan 3 2'-0" NIA Lot 21, Plan 4 T1,9". Lot 30, Plan I 3'-g" Lot 52, Plan 4 5,'-3" Lot"56; Plan 4 . $'-3" 6'=3" Lot 57,-Plan 1 V_,g" Lot 58, Plan 3 N/A Lot 59, Plan 4; Lot 60, Plan 3., V-.,V NIA Lot 64, Plan 4 Lot 65,'Plan 2 5'-0" N/ Lot 66, Plan 4 6'_9" NIA Lot 71, Plan I P1'Em. ey OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVI$ION EXHIBTT•p r RESOLUTI"ON fi0. A .RESOLUTION` OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ?HE' CITY OF fiANCHO`CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING DESIGN._REVIEW FOR LOTS 1 2 3, 10, 12,46 22 25 26 28-30 32-34; 52_fif, AN D54-7 1 OF RA ' l T CT NU.;I16 2� -FOR DEJELOPMENT.' OF�_36 I SINGLE,FAMILY- LOTS LOCATED:;NORTH DF ALMOND STREET, WEST OF BERYL STREET ,IN THE VERY!,,LOW RESIDENTIAL''`DISTRICT. (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS'PER ACRES AND'MAKING FINDINGS ' IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 'i061-801-3, 'S THRO 81 UGH 9, 14; 18, 19.,, 21 THROUGH 26, AND 29'THR9.UGH 32 AND 1D61 1i-I THROUGH 3, 8 -THROUGH 1% 18 THRONK V, 23 .THROUGH ,2!i, , AND 27 .THROUGH 29, C A. Rec ita l.s& (i) H & S Development has filed tan application for..the Design, ;Review.I of certain lots within Tract No. •11626, as described ;in the title ';of this' Resolution. Hereinafter', the subject• Desi ilk ev�ew re u t :: Ili "the application.° 9 q.es is .referred to.as 00 On May 23, 1900, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) Ali 1e ga.L..prerequisites"prior to the adoption of than Reso ution have occurred. B. Resolution, N04, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and olved :by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho. Cucamonga as fo1lows� 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all.'of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are•.true and correct.• 2. Based upon substaiv,ial evidence presented ;,to this Commssion>,, during 'the above..referenced meeting on May "23,, 1090, including written and oral scoff reports; this Commissian hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives. of the General Plan; and „ the Development Codeb. aandh the pro I 'design is in accord with the objective of located;-and purposes of the district' in which.the si..e is_, c. That the. proposed design is in compliance with each of the' applicable provisions of the Development Code; and �fM PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR FOR TT 11626<- H 1 S,DEVELOPMENT May 23, .1990 Page 2 d. That the proposed desi`Qn, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental 'to' the public.health, safety, o welfare or materially Tnju,ious to properties or improvements in the vicsnityil . ; 3, Based upon the findings and conclusions set;farth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the applicati4a subject, to each and Every condition set fokk-'6 low and In the attached Standard Conditions," attached hereto and incorporai;i�;�.herein by this reference ; 1) This approval is granted ,cool ng2tit upon approval of the rented Variance 90-04, . 2) All pertinent conditions of,Resolution Na. 83- 95,.approving Tentative Tract 11,626 "shall apply.'. 3) Lots 30, 12, 33 and ' 34 shall have slope stabilizing devices installed prior -to' occupancy ,retease. The. design shall be approved by the Buiiding Official prior to the issuance. of grading or. building pem,its, ! 4 4) AlT existing curb cuts. along the:lot frontages than are:not to be used as °driveways shall be removed and replaced with Standard .curb. and gutter. 51 ' All }existing trails shall be regraded and repaired as necessary, to eliminate erosion problems. 5) The following manufactured stone" is approved` for installation as a building accent material: 4. The Deputy Secretary to •this Commissfan`shall certify',d the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OFMAY„ 1990. PLANKING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA` BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller4 Secretary 7- .,PLANN,1NGL COWISSION RES04UYIBN NO. DR FOR T'11626 - !i &S„OEVELOPMENT May 23, 1990 Page 3 I. Brad Buller,. Secretary of the Planning Commis-siori of tfie City of Rancha Cucamongat, .'do ,hereby certify that- the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly. introduced passed and d b , ' , adoptey the Planning Cormmission of the, City of Rancho Cucamonga,' at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hel-d:' on: the 23rd day of May, I990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: C Ohl 1 SIMitRS': \� lR� . r i 1 f u" C , � 1 4i Y4 g'S4w�^ . 14,NgbY L$ ^o:�a•> .`i"" x�9�Y.�.ri•. $'u dill 17 s c Bg p c i;�w a •Y a gob Oy�N 0 1r 12 $N .4 :^$ orb, Y '`'.� xj �. �`6,^YY�'�•L d6 G(�C.YC,�.NM.S0 qYL0 fO5��YY;�� N^�d.-p}��s^t .sd. ^L6ffi N6wY NE �Y � ppp. 1CN- V Y N@ 370.53- a W �L ^V��GpTyii qYOPffi�� Y�®y6T''B POM - aI alai $ 9 ® L A Cal ITPtiwIS a 16 16$q~ 1 P. ^gP$o N �rg YM® Ulm N ill m. • ��T�` 4�rY3 CYU9t�0YyY Y��i'4Y�� ppY LO YV` V� pN V 1. -- L 3111' Y py.®y� - $ C V 2 MYY j�� " Ls* *oS �aCg w3 C.- y sill SX55 Qcs � 'zc ry Us es v ��'= g"`� u�xQ �oC �5"��� a L'S= y ►g1y$ �s ~ ` a CC o 4 M.o. _o ppp $ S Qffi Y$au '�yy�N pYdG YS�1�6 iu�y�4 ==S.ow YY O{ v` 4QV Y.Vtmw Q� yYK NLSO..i �w¢ yM�tY�p 3y yuO O`p �0 ♦.MyG y o R�0. ^q„O.�Z�f6�� L�•3 im- rel uo Q G G(yt y+ y g C+ 3 NppC _» 6q1 ggqp 4 d 'a.y Yw�CBNO ii Lp N C `P7S L�r� +ip.-O•"JJJa �.Y-NY _�yNNL y4 �.. �v L.. � sii5o"116 HE .7i`.I�w�Hill $ ;'Ms TL 3fliI � .cL°,r81 v'Zi"ct Q t »��0 ?'� 5=� 0�� '�•f ,t: °CMypV S•.op Ntlo ♦�a6�MY, » Q=2S M M L Y Y- ra 6� tl�.~. L O ��... � g L�x» a`" a(�_« Y a`n9 _Ypr �"�yyga� is »�r�apM' M ,'00. : N jai O N 'XI cc N' ® �► L � !S 1i ,jY i�^� � �Y ^rd y s 11j� a•'' a w a N wyq y� aus p` qr�V ��Ng V.e s�a.: �i�40�:. •s 4'� Y �rR� q S' $ FL Eli t ,7, . a Fee or 0- �� g�=� r jig it 13LB I eu at �g.e. 7yq N4�D 3� 4 106 $yew Lsi 2 $ raA�$e� yo� .27 0 _dreg. Ni ^.N'� ��Qy �. L w N E`o�'a Qu 8 fi" aII 8b',ZIANtea' _ N d s L e y O.OQ �N Y ,iS N �^ qtl�!y.,,.V _4`V•�!.•1 Y as «a LyEo.7�$$ - YpS'�9.« 4 a... 61 _�qC O �.. •YS3 ��•ll\ �_ •{p•�Yw.OY a i: % YS . .� �1q YY. B.Y.+_� � _ •`N �� � ��Q Y��iNJ OY.i.�� ^= -C�N� i'1•SL5 CN Y.�ySOjl` 0V4�YC1 a�tL� M YY VONi�Y�¢1 NQ a o��L. LQN 4.` :N —p •Yr NOO,...^ ��ss' OOOY YON N_• — Q.YpV •YM 7` 0.��Q �` •N•.0 Ylyyv NL�r�y' ^Op yy s� KN�p� pp Y rgyy. �Gl • SY. .•0..��C �$ I Nnpit a„pQg Cm Y•+ ���+�`^J p�.. S���y —� �Y� L`6 $eOvG� �?Y yP C� fl c: rzN—y TTT,... •y oY�+ 'W—.bx-`s., a..�MWE ��.. � k u Nfl dY' Ny�G (� ^Y. 1 Y«GY V p M 1 N • pY Yt Y L 4 0 Y 1L•j� D. t CY •Y�Y`� N CL6 CYM E..r��f 3 Y G999yyyyg///l xy On. O v^ •• '�3 p L N(1,•NpG 'NM 1.2.NIY.I� X���`pQ� $•!`...V^9 y�O{1I YYyN YN1V� iGl qqi iai •�y ! `q� ®� @ Qo j1 O103 1..M LcRI` ®..NL ®.}$! YNY Y _O�L.L. ` g�Y.4 .� 0j93yip�,j ^.Y age�. CZ-" -CiN E N O -Y`•rMi iN y.'.�"Fal H:�� a0.•..a 1L —� cpLg IL 7 OnZ YaaC YY s �9YyQ{. Y 0 79 aY N �. `�, Q Y 'yY■ Ty is g•�;zi N.R N Y� �1— �.� ` Y."+ 1y1 Y O^ all ii 3 ! SR E I flai az S�1 q N Ra•l.1� $ i.VN ►,0.. t4D. B� oAIL .: = O.LL ! aSs r .. 4a� g .� w -� O i Y EE y{y{1�•�.ef,Yy �O• 4 �O ONy aw 'u.e'a WY W 7 4¢�1 v N V• µ.•4.C {y��� O Y.^' 1�f�.w4 Y,y CEO N u fa C FJ H L Q� 4M $ Oy d .• Oft 6 L.if4 —y: OgqCY .4�V( Intltl .ppCY..�M® �17�9 u 'v4 w d� `YC4Q Cy`L Q 6aN uC> aS..et,, n u����aa••� ^ +0 DV 49 pyyM� N.w.Y C•�� V:�xw y�.SF.G W `�q- p��.i �O �fi0 Sao O V OgGG J y~.ppY }((:'Si..:`H'� `. O d00 ��® +•O xpO age : A Od�{. p�p44Y 4 •�i. .M vg Gf �X my c .. «OI..•GvAY1�19 G.9Y. �gg.,q "Piiy� 16 , 'i g Set .^b ,'n`� a 'Ss v n OW; iB L, 1 V;0 19YyC�� Y Y a a N u L G Q V vG V ppN '6�'➢L N¢}p �a�' t ... w . �N>.NYS^O },•�:b< Oppf yy. Vpc is u x Fe:91.9 1��6� arr Jt� I�.QO � �Q•' �g y q�Q+ p,�y A.O vy v1 :W�b. �i�ii 4Cr Yf �vi"CI W N �YL a Ski IT nupp: q YO S Q .yg CC r p C 6 p O •�p r8 O � m�w• . g y A $y! 4 Oq1 4 6 g� CCO�•�y 4�.® V �� o � v @p�.�A� a y, ��, Ly ®- „�.��. M A14 v f v 8 �u M Sv 2165 Ire 3 fill :5.yp... 3 yy S 1N��To. �9W $ �.. � <Y4P p a Wa L n p g y R .eyy[ V°.:Sn� Y Y�"W 0�� I .. � LA q M.'q�liKT V'.. y� ..�Y V - S y i.^ M ii^i.y �uY CP ii�uoaa', P� 9 Le` 0.q. gg s W �a �C � �0 afAi GN^ OY Y QO�rm Zb OtDq�fr ��Jl41Y �Q � OYON 'O 6.II�Jo1 2.2�Lam. p g L M W Sf • �p P®s A. b yF �M_Y 8� •� � �p� P... it y�� Y d ®® �q1y (� r $$y as m � ogIs L9 $ 1 pS p` m p MP PI . iq• Y3 x�pq al —Aoil � a Mec3 It� H3 g,� ®h`(� O p ppY tW �P a� �v1fl• N /q e .--` n�r .$ ',.. �$cr�tl, w " $ • mow:'. ~ g o pN g� `. 0y9 1; M .c. IAO VE. pNpY NJY u �.h.' az :.Y vC 4 H C: Y Y O.Y. y_. $.• y E • O :q = g}! y '� Q C p� OQ ye Y :.� e9W �� Cu�i. � is �• O a.. C C E ^G a�a L s�* ._gam• Y p�.¢�Qp yCy 'S O q e q y �Q •l .w. C O ` MA 31 :CL C`:V� QQ •y O� �� r y0 $ .Nq V:C rJY` .O�L OY .r ai O�y LQ 40w...N Yy 43 �_... yy3tl�. u ..' ar rLi.o ��.. M_+Yi.� C� Gy7 Y�^uE.Q NC 5I- 15 10�i �•�YY Y� 2 is uOi Y�� V C titl Ofcc�.i WatNN,1 yyL Nfd N:� !^ -Yy�L' P$ p Va b GC 3tlR50:, A ® A 4 e s Y Y OA C� " S{� e L _ YYY a 9 CY y Y 4g u0 O ... S� O: aL/ g yy Ma3,�['N at '^: y� Y H Aq Y b S S m ®yb �y �rga ffiwp$0 }jy`V po .•�. _ tl �y¢ •� ` M /�� �41 ism" ® y ug �� yN J•p pY V�� W i G Ii Y ~p_� i 9.M 9 V L „L ' 4 ^O O Y® � +H CY.Q yy� pp ' G cm>yY9y u9 . • z 3 sq i `LYObI Y^eg^! L sew®' » g cr. q b 0 Y��6 Sao..N NN CY!1.Jr H. . 00 g� B L V OY q ® b i O J.q V g -� r _ esiNi I Y� teYa®aH� liee's NSO O Jn 30 a� b Q IL C► tis r » b^ Di ` q OI � � Y r�s g n ash xa - $BE RZ off _ � 3 qqe� m be c »Y a � '�•• � a S :r Pa _�". ® of an i� Eli- �� � €� gs° » »A !s V M. Yy 'CW 0•i K8 Ci ��ir 1O�, �i f M B� ^' e F.: RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTIL'y..'--OF THEN PLANTING COMMISSION OF'.THE-CITY bF . , RANCHO.' CUCi�dONGA,' CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 90-04, THE REQUEST TO"EXCEED THE=.BUILDING 'ENVELOPE { ESTABLISHED BY THE` HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT`ORDINANCE ,t# X3 LOTS WITHIN'A 36 LOT DESIGN REVIEW. A"-.r,ICATION LOCATED NORTH OF ALMOND STREET; WEST•OF BERYL STREET IN'iiic' VER;Y`• : LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELL'ING,UNITS PER ACRE),' AND MAKING FINDINGS "IN.,SUPPORT THEREOF, -' Ap#:' a' 1061-801-3,45 THROUGH 9,',"^4 18, 19; 21 THROUGHI,, 6 AND 29 THROUGH 32 AND, 1061-811-1 THROUGH=3, 8`THROUGH THROUGH 21, 23- THROU6 25,'AND 27 THROUGH29: . A. Recitals. H & Development asfiled anapp licatibn for the issuance of a ., Va„iance No, 90-04 as described in the title of this Resolution.' Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance' request •is referredto' as: "'the:, , application." (ii) On•the 23rd'of May,•1996, the 'Planning`Commission of the City of, Rancho' Cucamonga. conducted '.a iduly noticed public ,hearing on the.appiication and concluded said hearing on that date.,,., ( n, All legal'pr°erequisitdOe or to the adoption ofth "s Resolution have occurred. _ B. Resolution." s; HOW, THEREFORE, it `is FiereL, found, c#e term inedi,and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission h:reby specifically finds that• ally"of the facts; set forth in the Recital , Part A, of this Resolution are, true and correct.:. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented: to this. Com ssi during the, abevereferenced public, hearing on May,23, .1990, including'writen: and oral staff reports,-:together.,with:pttblic testimony, th s Commission hereby Specifically finds as folloWS* (a) The appl icitioni applies to lots 102 12,. 30,. 52, 56, 57, E �• 58, 59, 60, 64, 65, 66 and 71 of Tract 11626.a .: ' (b)` * The property to the north is vacant, -.the property to the south, east, and west contains existing single family residenc " is PLANNING COM14ISSION RESOLUTION NO,. VARIANCE 01-04 - ,H & S DEVELOPMENT May 23, 1yJ Page 2 A" (c) The application contempiates the construction of 13 single- family homes whose ultimate height will "exceed 'the. building envelope established by the Hillside Development Ordirance.;; (d1 Tha, application will allow the "13 'structures to exceed the ` building envelope along r:,.e side"of the "proposed structures"fair a maximum af.8, feet, 3 inches.. (e) Adjacent residences were not subject to the •same'•building envelope requirements. (f) The: variance is necessary because" of .the Hillside Development Ordinance, which became effectIe March 8, 1943: " (g) The subject tract was• reco"rded .prior� to the adoption of the Hillside Development Ordinance. p . 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the,,.speci,fi,c findings "of facts set forth 'in paragraphs '.1 and 2..above, this-Commissiw`hereby finds anc( ' concludes as fol I ows: (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result i'n practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Aevelopment Code. " (b) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances : or conditions applicable to the property involved`or to the: intended:;Use of the property that do not apply generally, to, other properties in'the same'' district. (c) That strict or 'literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by .: the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting.of the Variance will not constitute a. ,.t grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on =, other - properties'; classified in the same district. .(e) That the granting of the,.Variance will not be detPimental ' to the public, health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties' or improvements in the vicinity. 4 Based upon the findings:and conclusions set;forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 .above, this Commission hereby approves the application. 5. The Secretary to this commission "shall certify,to the adoption : of this 1:31 r ti PLANNING. COMMIS SIGN, RESOLUTION N0: VARIANCE 90-04. H S( 6EVELOPMENT May 23, '1990 , , Page 3 1' APPROY,Eu AND ADGPTED:THIS z3RD.60,'OF;MAY, 1940. PLANNING' COMMISSIQNE;t7F'TNE CITY OF RkAa,CHO GUCAMON6A r . BY Larry "T. McNiek _Cha rman ATTEST: f Brad Buller, Secrer�ary I Brad Bulled, "Secretary of` the Planning,}Commission bf the,C,ity of'R3ncho Cucamonga, do hereby ,certify tfiat: the foregoing, Re'solution. was du5y" and: -eguI' y introduced;, ;passed, a'ed adopted by the:;Plantii'ng Come ssior of the' City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the.PiI ing Commission held on the 23rd day of.May, 1990�ti;iby the follong.Yote to-ddi,t. 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS:, t NOES ICOMISSIONERS:.. ABSENT: COMMISSIONEOS: J�f e+ , 4� r .i 3 �I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .} STAFF REPORT , f DATE, May 23, 1990 x T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission �{. FROM_ Brad Buller, 'City Planner 3 r' BY: Tom Grahn,, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC 'PLAN N AMENDMENT 9NOI - An amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan pertaining to tha ,proposed removal ' of existing Eucalyptus windrows as a result-of the alignment of Summit Averr,4e weSt of Etiwan�a Avenue and other street al igs�ments. I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13812 was approved .11 by the City Council on December 7, 1988,,with a-condition for the,;constrUCtion of Summit Avenue, full-width excluding off-sitte.:., parkway improvements, between- the tract .jnd the intersec�cion of Summit Avenue. On January 17, 1990, ,the City Council recommended adoption of the modified alignment' for Summit Avenue for the area east of .Tract 13812 and west of 'Etiwanda Avenue (see Exhibit Prior to the adoption of the modified street alignment of Summit Aven�:e by the City Council the actual alignment needed to be 4 established. Following approval.; of Tract 138121 the City Engineering Division was working with the developer in obtaining the necessary rights-of-way.when a,conflict was indicated by the San Bernaraino. County Surveyor that the actual locatiion of the Summit Avenue alignment could not be determined. IThis was due to conflicting survey information, ambiguous wording in deeds'. and the possibility that the original subdivider max have not had ' legal title to the land. When the ambiguity of property ownership had been determfned, the City Council was faced with 'a dilemma. The alignment. of, Summit Avenue had to be established, and the alignment wodi'd either conflict with existing, structures or with a Eucalyptus windrow designated for g preservation .by the Etiwanda Specific .Plan. In determining the street alignment the City Council chose 'the option that Mould provide - the least conflict and minimize the condemnation of existing structures. As a result, an,alignment 77 eras selected that will require the removal -f one garage, and the Eucalyptus windrow. 1 PLANNING COD1•itISSION•STAFF REPORT ESPA 90-01,- Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment May 23, 1990 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: - t' A. General: Tree Removal Permit 90-14 was tiled with�� the Planning ,Division, for the removal of 31 ' Eucalyptus-gees, Whose location conflicted with the rights-of-way:'improve"bts for Summit Avenue. The Etiwanda Specific Plan identifies several . Eucal;yptu� ' ' windrows as Well as other Palm,, Pepper, Silk Oak, and Olive ` -trees as • being' worthy of protection and ",prescrvat%'ii (see Exhibit "C") The intent of windrow; preservation is established through Section 3.36 by stating the following objective: "The' preservation and pei,petuation of, a windbreak. system, equal to-,or better than the existing'windbreak system, should be promoted for reasons of public safety; -'wind protection, historical significance,' and aesthetics." Further, -Sections 5.31.304(a) and .41.201 state °Existing windrows located along''or within public street rights-of-way specified in Figure 5-13 shall be pr +serveii." By, stating these objectives and requirements,_the specific plan clearly indicates .that the windrow in question was intended to be preserved, Lmaintained, and supplemented with,tree plantings to enhance the appearance of the windrow 'and add . to its historical significance: The. Tree Preservation Ordinance was established to provide some, control mechanism fore the preservation; of trees throughout the" City by establlW fig criteria for, :L he protection of ;"Heritage Trees." However, it also allows the consideration of a tree(s) removal when the, `removal is necessary for the construction of required improvements within . the public street rights-of-way. 3. Revisions to the Etiwanda� Specific Plan: The Eucalyptus windrows identified in . Figure 5-13 were selected for preservation as their :location. provided the least conflict with future street alignments. However,, as in 'this..case, there will be occasions where'additional tree removals may be necessary. Any • request for the removal, of these windrows currently requires an O,dinance Amendment ,to the Etiwanda _•Specific Plan. The cG,irse of review requires Planning`'Commission approval, :apprnval' by the City Council with first 'and second readings, and an additional"30=day period prior to approval; a time period minimum of'.3 months. To simplify .the'.pracess: the.: Commission'may want to consider modifyfng Sections'5.31.304(a) and 5.41.201' of the Etiwanda `Specific Plan. These revisions PLANNING COM418SION STAFF .REPORT ESPA go-0Ie- Ftiwanda--Specific Plan Amendment May 23, 171 r Page 3 would allow for Planniz,3 Commission review and approval of tree removal requests. ;then necessary, without'' additional amendments to the Specific: Plan. This would require the following text amendments, higi,i4ghted in bold print: Section 5 31.304(a), Pane S-31: Except as noted in',Section 5.4I.201,:existing,mature. trees lo,:ated within for along public, street rights-af-way specified in Figure g.I3., shall be preserved .and: supplemented with plantings in accordance with street cross-sections, ;Figure`5-20 through 5-40. Section 5 4I.2nl, page 5.37: Except as tspecified' below, existing 'windrows located along or within public street "-rights-of-way xcified in Figure 5-13 shall be '•preserved. Individuail trees or sections of such windrows which are diseased 'or damaged by' fire shall be replaced with 35-gallon size Eucalyptus Maculata (Spatted Gum Eucalyptus) 4o match existing ' pattern and spacing. Howsever, the Planning Coemission:shall have the authority to'approve a Tree Removal Pemit subject to the ;following findings:, u " - t. (a) That the proposedwine;onr' removal'is,necessary in order to maintain public,saf�ty when determining the alignment of publ is streets.._ (b) That no reasonable and viable alternative, such at,11 tieet realignment,.exists. (c) That:'adequate replacement plantings :will take place,, consisteent with the Etivanda Specific Plan Standa►,As (d) That the proposed windrow removal, together will,... the conditions thereto, will not be detrimental to the p�hlic health, safety, or welfere or materially injurious to j properties or improvements in the vicinity. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: ,Before approving the Specific Plan Amendment, the Planning Commission must determine that the amendment will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause `significant f environmental- impacts. In addition, the proposed amendment is consistent with the intent of the General Plan' and the Etiwanda f Specific Plan. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has -completed Farts T and II of l " the Initial Study and .has found 'oo sigr0 ficant environmental Impacts as a consequence to this amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan. PFANNING, COMMISSION"STAFF i REPORT. ESPA 90-01 = Et wanda Specific Plan Amendment May 23, 1990 Page 4 V. CORRESPONDENCE: This items has belen. ade��rtsed a� a public hearing, .in The Daii-y Report.news;paper', t1e ;,property posted wall ith the,. supplemeptal, notification sign, and notices".sent to., property pwners within, 300 feet of :the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION:,, Staff recommends the Planning Gommcsfon adapt a solution of A�Sroyal recommending to the City Counct :,thdt hey pp�vegoe wi6da,specific P;(an`-Amendment�90-0I ttrodgh:aa),;opti,on of ehe Battd Resolut, gn,.,and issuance of a Neyat,ye Dec:ldration. espec �i A mit d, S ad Bul er i lAty f nner BB:TG/ffs Attachments:'.. Exhibit "A" - Location Map'. Exhibit 'IS" Modified Street Alignment for Summit Avenue `tint_ iihibiV IIV - ESP Figure°S,_I3 F;r Exhibit "D" ESP Figure 3-13 Amended `; Exhibit "E" ESP Figure 5-f• �� >'Reso'ution cf Approval- J I 1 f ti [ t r, Y J • MMII AVE `4 L MHIGHI AHi3 A'V N of UCAMONQA TI'lEM: - PLP!`.' IONit,*1 E)aMrr. SCAM: ��•�• ,. 'ASH" f`iw t �f � x. 10 a. 1 r . i . 140ri a w IE w J fit s� I Alk <:1d 1: T It (l I {, --`a- �-----�---�—�-�-- ----- arm � l i UPI' o •e�� I r U, O r .AWL tS � c v YJ r - lit 'Liu ' S Ak B6S7{Hi37GOY0(a4m1 GPM" WAS t '. za s►a ssR / j Cave Grove II' {` M w D ��, ►I Q TRf!FS TO BE PRESERVED .. sting Windbreaks IIO111FR.YPalms �p®p a Exis*ig Trees " f / Sties°GE 2908 drove _ J ,L-- y/; i) } �// �� titie fissure r, I STREET TREE PRESERVATION clw: or _ UCAMIONGA ON �lil iiLlLTi: � a�'li.L?LF.: Ii RUao Grov® �� s Monrr�•yr �I_I,��,,;� V J I IQ —f MlGHULLVD AY6 it AVE om 26 i / .p i r 'EXISTM24 STREET -� TREES TO BE PRESERVED' y„ Existing Windbreaks AV- �ae�ecgpt/ tee e fi wre STREET TREE. „g ,PRESERVATION 14, PI.A.� �IS�._ i -m--�— �S� EXFIMrr: � SCALE: .. it ROUM : Frpeway,Access INIONEW Major Arterial imagma secondary Arterial ug~causal Special Design Collect-or l �'I� II Inns Local streets l i STREET SYSTEM ®� 1 { �' TIC TTa"d.E• n p N lift RESOLUTION NO. •'A A RESOLUTION' OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION: OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA :RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC. PLAN AMENDMENT 90-Q1, {AMENDING .FIGURE 5-13 AND SECTIONS 5.31304(a) AND, ` 5�f4I:201 OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN PERTAINV`G TO THE PRESERVATTON''OF EUCALYPTUS WINDROWS AND:'' MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) The City, of Rancho CucamL;,ga has initiated an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 90-01 as described in the, tit,e of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution," the `subject°t-Specific Plan Amendment request is referred to as"`the application.". (ii) Os May 23, 1990, the. Planning Commissionjiof the''City,of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly, noticed pubic hearing on` the application and concluded said hearing on that date; (ii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of 'this Resol'ui on have occurred. 6. Resolution. NOW, THERE^ORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolVed by the Planning Commission of the City of. Ravicho Cucamonga as follows:' 1. This Commission hereby specificatly ;finds that all of the facts set S'orth in the Recitals, Part A', of this Resolution 6..re true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence pre5enteu to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 23, 1990, =ncluding :written and oral staff reports, together with public_ testimony; this Commission heresy ` specifically finds as follows.- (a) The .proposed amendme4ts will not havtA I sl gnificent impact* or, the environment as evidenced by ,the conclusions and findings of tk+F:jr.itial Study, Part II; and (b) The proposed amendment is .necessarytoa7low Cor' the removal of a Eucalyptus windrow identified for preservation.by Figure 13 of.'' the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented` to this Commission during "the above-re•Perenced public hearing,`and upon the specific findinr� o'f facts set Earth in paragraph I 1 and 2 above, this Comission hereby`finds`and � . concludes-.` 5 follows: n jr rf PLANNING COWS SSION RESOLUTION NO. ESPA 90 OT -.iETIWANOA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMNT May 23 i, 1991r Page 2 (a) That the proposedr amendment ,is •necessary;. in order :to Maintain public safety when determining the alignment of public streets. _.. (b) That:'no reasonable and- viable a ex lternative ists, such as street realignment. (c) That the proposed amen'me'nt, 'together aw.ith the conditions thereto, will not be, detrimental .to' the-p'bl" _health; safety, or welfare'or materially injurious -to prop6eties.or improvements in ttie vici'nTty. (d) That the'"nroposed.amendmont, w:lll not be.,detrimental'to the objectives of the General Pldnvor the6Etiwanda:Spe'c: ii' Plan. " 4. This CotamTssion hereby finds that�the pro',ect has been reviewed and considered; ii, complii^nce,with,the California;:EnvircnmentaT;�ualfity act of 1970 any+-, fvrthers this Commission hereby recommends :fssuence cf 6 Negative Declaration. 5. - 'Based upon the findings and' conc.i,usions set €'fth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4;abo'e his .Com,iss•ion hereby re'T Ives. as foliawsa. (a) That pursuant to Section 6585Q to, 65855 of the .C_al Oornia Government Codes diet *he Planning Commissfior� of_the City of`Rar�ho• �ucamonga ( hereby recommends approval 'on. the 23rd day of May'1990, C' "i nda Specific Plan ' Amendment 90-Qi amending Sections 5.31.304(a) and 5.41.20Tand Fi follows gur2,,5 13 as Section 5.31 304(a)c Except as noted it Section 5.41.201. ei rp X sting mate trees, located within or along public street rig;rfis-of way specified in, Figure 5-13 `shall be preserved and"'.supplrmeri`1, d 'with plantings in accordance with, atreet crosse-sections, Pillars 5-20 through 5740. Section 5.41.20i: Except , as specified below, existing windrows located along or •within public. street rights-of-way,,spec fied. in'. Figure'5-13 shall berpreerved. Individual trees or sections of-such windrows which are diseased or 6maged by fire shall' be replaced''with 15-gallon size.Fucalystus Macula�a (Spotted Gum weaI yptu's) ce match existing pattern and spacing; Hoiever, the Planning``Cn tsslon 'shal`1 have the authority to approve a Tree,, Permit .tc the' following findings., (a), That the propased',windrow remove'",iis necessary.,in order,to imain'tain public.,safety then determining the alignment of public.streets. (b) .That no retisorlable e ..alttrnatTve,•`such as (€ street real 1gnment,� t � PLANNING COMMISSInN'RESOLUTION NO. ESPA 90,01,-, ETIWANDl SPECIFIC_PLAN-AMENDMENT May 23, 1996 f Page 3 1; (c)' That adequate .replacement plantings.wiit'`#:ake p1acE�y ccnsstynt. aith the Etiwanda Specific-Plan -Stendardsi {d) That the -proposed-- windrow rewival, together 'With, the conditions thereto a wi1i- nat _ e �etriq�ental to''the Public health, safety, 'or nelfar-e or- 'mrteria']1;� Wurious to .' properties or impro;iemeriti ` �n the I' yic.iriity. ,, Fiaume kUl:1:(Attached) ti (b) That the Plannirg Commission hereby recommends ihet the t City Council approv 'and 'adopt Eti4ianda Specific'Plan' Arlerdment`: No, 9U-S1. {c) That a Gerdfied 'Copy' of the Resolujtionl and related material hereby adopted by' the Pl6nninr Commission` shali he rorw; rded to the City Council. 6. The Secretary to tFAlis Commission shall certrf'fy to the, adoption of this Resolution, r�H APPROVE) A tO ADOPTED THIS,23RD DAY OF MAY, 199r1. ` PLAIiNING C014MISSION OF THE CITY OF RAt1CH0 GIiCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman. ` ATTEST. Arad Buller,,Secretdry I' Btaci Bullerr Secretary of the Planning CotiQnission ofthe City of Rancho' Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fdregoing Resolution, was duly, and regulat•]y ;ntroduced, Passed,;,and, adopted ;by the pldnrii`ng' Cormlies:on'..of, the a ;r City of Rancho Cucamonga, at egular fleeting of the planningt:Camfniss on herd on the 23rd day of May, 1990, byl the foiloidingOtE'-ta-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: CQtL�fISS10NERS. j� -t ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: � ,.r .1. ff i I E L MI&LAND AM tr AVL. 0 �� ��-.�I EXISTING 5 R ET TEES TO 13E PRESERVED dbrevdi 1E Win I Palms alt of 71 AMEHC '� '/f� iI title f gib a = STREET TREE ION n CITE'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - ST"F REPORT 10 DATE: May 23, 1990 +0: CLairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City P1anntx BY Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSEi-SNiENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-016 PITPSSI/DALMAU ARCHITECTS - A request to amend ;the General Plan Land Use Map from Office to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) far 3.56 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Archibald- Avenue and Church Street.. The City will also consider Neighborhood• Commercial and Low Medium Residential as alternative designations - APN: 1077-332-26.'-- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVEI:OPEiENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 90-02 - PITASSIJDALMAU ARCHITECTS - .',request to _. amend the Development District Map from "OP" (Gffice/Professional) to rM" ,(Medium Residential, 8-14 j dwelling units per acre) for 3,56;acres of land located at ` the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street. The City will also consider ",X" (Neighborhood Commercial) and "Lr. , (Low P+Qdium Residetitiall as. : altern.4tive designations - APN• 1077432-26. i. DISCUSSION. The property for which these land .use amendments are being proposed also has a development proposal going,throuccu the,', Cicy's 9esign:Dzview process, The applicant has requested -e continuance until the development proposal can also be reviewed by the Planning tQi3inissian. 'Staff cancurs with this request. II. RECOMMENDAT'.ON- It is recommended that the Planning Commission continue tltrese items until the applicant's develorment proposal is ' ready for Planning Commission review. The General Plan/Development District applications will be re-advertised for the future meeting date. Respectfully P y �- I 1 City Pianner Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Letter _. - BB:AW:Js ITEMS I & a �a. �- Pitc�ssrC�lm�uVx 010 Q a MAY 111990, May 11, 1990 a . Petse J.PIta541.A.I,A: Mr. Alan Warren /Uchlteok Alain Dalrnau,AlA Associate Plantie:, ;- Prchtteat City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Basnline Rd., Suite C 1,.0..Eok B07 Rancho Cucamonga.,.CA Subject: GPA 90-01B, DDA 90-02" 5outheast 'roner of Church Streetrand:Arr_ bald Avenue Dear Alan: We are hearby requesting a.continuance of our-public heating for the above referenced. agplications,which. ate sFhedu�A-d fvL the May 2;3, 1990 Pla ninq;,rommiss 6ho agenda"x As �,.'U are"; aware, we stbmitted a'de5ign,,review application"concurrently with our GPA and DDA on ,March 15; 199A. Our:'design review application is,"nurrently scheduled for �the June 21, '1990' I Design Review -meeting and, as 'you suggested,' it may "be appropriate to present all applic'atio''s for, Planning Commission consideratior, at one time. We thank you,in advance for your assistance re'darding our, request for this continuancE. Very Truly' Yours Pitassi•: a 'te is I� ter tassi, A I.A. Archit-sct PJP:mao 1 . r- 2 s 0167 HcNven avenue,Suite Zi6 m Rancho LUcamonga CA 9133U ® (794}980=1364 irxotiaa��r`ae, a ST F R2PO T .v GATE May�r3, 1990 T0: Chairma-n and;Members of the,Planning Commission 77. _ FROM: Brad Bu�(ler,`City Manner f ~ BY: Vince Be'rtoni, Assistant.:*tenner SUBJECT: 'ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CORDITIONAL USE PERNIT 90-13 MEDI-RID ,-..1HC = request to, estab ,ish a maintenance and vehicle starage: :^raciIity An a leased space of 5,780 square'feet 'w,ithi'0 he existing Biane Winer yl'complex- an 6,1 acres. of land- irt.,.the �;General Industria District, Subarea .5 of`"the Industrial,' pecific `Plan, aocated> at 10013;8th Street - APN: -209-2�-19 and ,'2,0. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCH PTI5,U,- A.. Actian Requested:. Approval.• of a nonrcons',r4 tj ,s Cohditibnal' 'Use, Permit for a maintenance ind'veh'icle =`tee center, to be located within an eni.sting winery and iss+y` a of_a .Negative Declaration. " ' B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North° - -:Vacant; Ganera,l Industrial, ,Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 5) South - Vacant; General Industrial, Industrial Area 'Specfic Plan .(Su6area-5) East Church; GeneraluIndustrial,,"ndustrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea S) " \1 West = Multi-Tenant IndustriaT Buildings; General Industrial, Industrial Area'Sp'e6ffl,-Plan. C. General Flan i'esianafars: ` -~- G, Project Site - General Industrial p _ (forth General Industrial Sc,jth General Industrial East - 'General Industrial West - General Industrial R. Site Characteristics: `ke p'roject' is developed with` an' e7xistfn9 winery. `s bi— .r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP. 90-13 - MEDI41DE,'INCr May 23, 1990 ; Pale 2 `a F. Parkins Calculations: Number of Number of Type 'Square Parking Spaces Spaces'. of tse Footage Ratio Regpired Provided Proposed Office `1,024 1/250 '4 4 Warehouse. 4,623;; {, 1/1000 5 5 ' Storage N/A 1/1 37 `. . =8 ,> " Existing Office 3,000 1/250 12 'Cont Storage rd. N/A N/A 6_ 6`` Au fi� Service ,.i 3.,000 1400 8 R Warehouse 57,965` 1/1000 58 58 Manufacturing 14,680 11500 a 29 29 Total 159 . i30 F. Applicable Repulations: The: Industrial Area SF ific Plan (Subarea 5 does not permit or Conditionally permit Autom9tive Fleet Storage, 11. ANALYSIS- A. General, ..The `applicant`s. proposal, is for a maintenance and vehicle*htorage facility for a fleet of 37:`•vans (see Exhibit' . "0"), `he ,vehicles would, be used to help with the transportation needs . of the elderly, ' handicapped,< and medically`dissbled. There will be a total of 8 employees 'werking `on the sa;rte i' including both office and maintenance personnel. In addition,' there will be. 23 drivers who'opera,te, the fleet of'vans. The proposed 'hours of operation are Monday through .Friday, 6:00 a.m. to 7:00, p.m, and 'Saturday,-8,30 a.m.. to 6:00 R'^ The Fire ,District and Sheriff's D partment have beet' contacted and do not object to the proposdd,,use. The Fire District I . indicates that -a plan check wilt he required 01-3or to I occupancy. ine Biane Winery Building is noted as a potential local state, and national landmark. No exterior modificatimns to the building are being 17,oposed. Y s t 4 T _ _ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF_REPORT CUP 90-I3,'- MEDI-RIDE,, INC.' "rr May Z3, 1990 Rage 3 t, B,. Land Use/Issues: ; The Industrial Specific .Pl•an`classifies the proposed use as Automotive F1eet ;Storage. This use; is conditionally permitted M—Subareas 1,,,3' 8, 9, and 11; h;=wever, it is n9t permitted or Condit onaI permitted in Subarea 5. The appli'artt ,is ._ requesting that the use be considered :Heavy;.,Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution, which is conditionally permitted-in Subarea 5. Automotive Fleet Storage is defined as. "the 'storage vehicles used regularly in business operations and not available: for sale on site. Such uses typically include, but are not limited to:" `overnight storage of service vehicles, mobilecatering, trucks', and taxicabs (Exhibit ":"), The proposed use is for service; vehicles which will bei_used exclusively for the.Med -kilde business. =x, Heavy Wholesale, Storage, and°'Distribution allowsfor trucking. firms,, automotive storage, and impourr! yards. Staff does not ,? believe that the proposed use,is included in this-category. C. Compatibility Issues: The complex in whicb Medi-Ride proposes to locate is'occupied by ii number of differ6it risers. These uses 'include.offices-, a ' contractors office, , automotive service, warehousing `and manufacturing. All ousfnesses' are generally open �iur.,ing similar hours throughout the creek. No conflictc are -iCected between therproled use and existing uses, -a',Irking az discussed,beloi�. _ 0. Parking Issues: According: to `:he data provided by the app'i14cant' and information,-gat!)'ared.by staff~,,the>existing parking, at the Winery would not be suffic'*At for the i proposed use (see Parking Calculations). , Then :are 130 Parkin——g'yoaces existing on the site.., The existing t Finesses wMin tho project site require 113 parking~=spaces which leaves only 17.,spaces j available.for Medi-Ride. A total of 46 pi,rking ysoace'.* would be required for the applicant's business oparatigkl., henee, the site would have a deficit of 29 parking spaces. ,ccording to 'the applicant (see 'xhibit "D"), ,there would ,be 8 office and maintenance employees, plus 23 ;&�, driver's. The � van drivers would park their personal vehicles on the.site and G tabze the 'vans out. The: business operates 37 vans,which would S1112, RBI n � z ,ry•, PLANNING, XMNISSION STAFF RE OPT CUP 90- 3 - MEOI-RIDE, INC. May 23, 1°10 Page 4 4 mean that 14 vans would remain on-site at any given tim A total of 45 parking Spaces would: be required usL113 the applicant's,statement of the need for parking for the proposed,_ business (leaving: a deficit of 28' parking spaces). in cunclusion, whether the City's parking rtcuirements ar the applicants calculations are used, a par;(ing shortage- of 28-29 spaces would occur, . E. Environmental Assessment: Upon re!o ev of ' 3r`t I Qf the initial Study and completion of Part 2 of the 9t vironmental. Checklist* staff'has found no significant impacii related to a maintenance and vehicle storage facility. 'lucating within'°the 3iane Winery. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In ordar to approve this Ipplication,: the following findings,need to"be made by the Planning Commission; A. That the proposed use is, in accord with the C neral Plan, the objectives of the Oevelapmeat Cxie,;and the. puxprses of the Industrial Specific Plan in which the Site is located.. B. The proposed use will net be detrimental to the public health, safetyA or welfare, or cztterially injorious to-,preperties or qW improiements in .the vicinity. C, The proposed use complies wit- each of the applicable provisions of the Development Cade =and Industrial Specific Plan.In stiff�� opinion,- the proposed use is not conditionally permitted in Suhsrea 5 of the In6'strial Specific Plan; therefore, the proposed use is.--riot in accord with,;,,..the Industrial Specific Plan. 3n addition,, there is.not sufficfec;t parking on-site for the proposed lite; therefore„ the proposed use,does nGt comply with the parkin&,p -visions of. the Development; Code tod the Industriial Specific IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item ,has been a0vertised a a public hearing In The l -,nd ;'alley Daily 8ulletiv newspaper, the progt�ty has been posh=., and notices have Caen sent to all:,property,;owaers and existing t6ants within 300 fc,et of the ,project. j JIT ;; ® t�. �� i! E t�S tiE01 R OS SAGO S use ae�rnit 16 0� %Ofl:one ite c, as de"a zsolu ;. . Staji 'r f o�e attache A�ZO o ti 0 tt6�0�StCa N udQ rot, V•- 90"S itiQa esoe ties fi ti. 8eS1ee r tiaP Sype Brad plae . Vicin PA r ant tat, hse �itY A , Site Q1at Pwic 41ae of V61 s 50-kb it 4�g�.. . Floor frog ,ecific Se ri 685 Exh�b .t "C�� 'Letter ries SP p1a n Attachmet Sx�bit����. . See%erpti S Speck S�hi f;nitiaps Sndus Suba�a e ti La t\Is to$Qet a, ResoSet10 a d� ,,,;, c` �,, I � 1 a �,a �� n4a =lllllldiil � �,,� ';,, tiX ��!,j �., � y F` K } 'JN dui '��i9��f. � ha 1a • B 4 f P f c; i�� wt a � � a� �a�. � � � � �; E MI®��- � 0 �r 4 x�, jy y 4 �w. �'t s 4� a � f r� I �1y� ,� f ,' t a � w M` PR o'L r .�; Y �t � i- x t �, � v:v i �. ''{ 4 d�. { l' f S w .�W . .. 3 .: ,` „r �t 1 ✓ y £ i m� �� ��,�,� rXAr�thF �l,' �g a�:<`7r a.'�^` tw a��• n� ,�,,i �y,.�, t'�� .. .•:,s srs� '1 ri � r,a � t t v? ' 1f ,.:. a .. � �• •, e•. ', � 'i ��_ '�� �. w a . r� _ ram. �+.� . .��� I e �ns �-� —4l?CY "J•i i 0- OF "�— I 1 !. _R I i A I 0 ©;•1 Jf'� {N/ �J� 1:�. I ;L.�. 1 is I .i t' r5 i3 s any��• d. .�p L i a 4 J � I I cII'Y ®F N ® MON' CUP 90-13 SITE PLAN I'`. En R SALE; NUDE rl, WIW.W iC9USZVI FACIL ITY .q' �Z 1 OFFICE AREA RAIV t , E, 'ITT OF RANCHO., CAMONdA CUP 9A PLdaMG DIMON, , >d ODR' AlAtd [err: SC°ACE: NotdE. aru Cuuzmor�a�L9�'irery �fioies . 6A1mVdM fA RONDBD WDMRY ND.t P.O.Bos'60T.Rancho'Cuevaon6a Cdiiortne 91T30 171419E0-7997. .. ; Pierre Bianc, for Rancho Cucamonga Winery Properties, is proposing to lease space at the Former Pierre Biane Winery to Medi-Ride Inc. The space'in question is a 1000 square foot office, in which one`, (1) ,manager'. one '- (1) secretary, and two, (2)1- dispatchers will - operate ;:the Medi-Ride Inc. 'Services.: Medi-Ride 'Inc. will' also occupy a 4780 square foot warehouse `gin which it "will tepair and . maintain 'it's vehicle's. ,There will be thrao" (3) full, time ' employees: working'.In the warehouse: -Medi-Ride.. Inc:, will also occupy 9000 square -feet, of designated yard space',for the parking of vans *and the drivers' personal; vehiccles. (Please refer to attached diagram''.: Medi-Ride Inc. is involved vith `.the' transportation +` needs ei the elderly, handieappedi and medically, disabled. Medi-Ride `Inc. employs„ eight (a) -officer and maintenarra personnel that would '.actually be working a 'the subject property. IIt also employs twenty,"three (23) drivers- who operate their fleet of 'thi,ty-seven . 7) vans. ?ARRNG: Medi-Ride Inc. will be provided with ten (10) executive :parking stalls as, designated on the 'm..p:` ` The additional 9000' square' feet, of Outdoor `:parking .woul,d ,be utilized as follows: During the evening's, approximately thirty• (30) vehicles, would be parked.in this area. The remaining seven' O, vehicles would be. parked in the 4780 square foot warehouse. As the twenty three .(23rL drivers came to work, they would remove one .(1) an from the parking area and park their own `personal car in.it#s place.. This paring area ii-° naturally -screened by mature sh " rubs and ;trees with ''no esthetic impact on the surrounding properties. Madi-Rids Inc.rs operating hours are from 6 AM to 7 PM Monday through Friday and 8:30 AM to 6 pM on Saturday,. According to the guidelines set forth`by.,.the'.1ndustrial Specific Plan for sub-area> S, Rancho Cucamonga Winery Properties was unable to clearly 'match Medi=Ride Inc.rs intended use with any specified`definition of Cher permitted " uses within sub-area S. Therefore,` to guarantee compliance with the ,City. of Rancho Cucamonga's Governmental Agencies. We are submitting this CUP application for your cena; i�r�� rn. CIS`OF RAN --CUCAMONGA CUP so-is PLANNING IDIMION _ TMIt- LETTER FROM APPLICr1N� T ' NTA { �6 Va { t Automotive Fleet S___t__a__r__a9�;2��' Activities typically include, u are not liamited to;, the storage of vehicles used regularly in business operat orts 'and not available for sale on site. Such uses typically' include,' but not limited to: overnight storage of service vehicles, mobile catering: trucks, and taxi Cass. Heavy „r�olesale 54.oraft and Distributions Activities j Calr Y'�' I UGR `bug are,, c"�-'a�"""l �i dad to, warehousing, storageo freight handling, shipping, trucking services and ter6inals; storage and wholesaling franc the premisej. of r unfinished, roe, or f semi-refined pvoducts requiring further. processing, fabrication or iftufscturing Typically uses inclFids, but are not limited to: trucking firms, r automotive storage or impound yardw, and the wholesaling of, metals,- minerals and 'agricultural products.. Outdoor storage is permitted' r Mere 24 boars cn-tito surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence my, be permitted n approved by 'a Conditional Use permit. 4 , Off` iPt�� tom: CUE',22-1 . ,.• :r IOtei' •land Use �Tyge Definitions rr. E S Lic: NIA { i TABLE 111-1 SUMMARY OF.LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA ® r9fle!TED Use, i°Cote81TI0U=, T PERAUTTED USE 'NOTE.Non-marked Uema.Not tpsemltt•d - USE TVPES Liind tie ® IP ®i ttl m tll GB IP t?QI QI Ctl iP at IP S+ 9uberees it t 2 >3 a 6 )- 8 10 99 7 14 10 RAAMd9FAC7'alt91RIQ � Cneloia �: Light a m • .® e • m ®. .. Hodiues m :o • • e • • o o e o o -o 0 • Heart "� $ • o OFFICE PROFESSIONAL.DESIGPD de RESEAS,RS. Professional/Design Senilces ® ,� $ ® • WIdO6ESALE S4ORAGE A DIl3TIIi pId ® • • • • o 0 0 Light O ® ® • e e • e 'm ® • '• o m ® s o b HaaVy • �$ ,•. CORfl8�9ERCIAL ® � ` • + Anlmsl Care • o $ $ $ $ + Automative Rental/Leasing $ Adenseft/LlB�itTwo ® • ® o q, Automotive/Truck'RepaL-Risjor • �. o ® • Solve Automotive Service Station c offlft oevactwe Building Contractor's Storage Yartl SuualneAUgHUng r;W,_ *SupPlMq&fttsa ® $ • $ ® ® • �, o o 40 ® b Fellness Support`Sarviceasorwim e o • • o o ® Y $ e • $ e • a $ ;; ;o • o s • e Convenience Salon a Service* ® • ® • Raft a ® } $ $ $ Entortainmentt • ® ®, e B o f Y aft 144 consomm $ $ $ $ + p Fast Food Sales $ $ $ + $ ¢ $ $ kworenco g'Ws•t Edaw Food a Beverage Sales $ $ $ '¢ $, ; } .$ $. a F Heavy Equipment Sales a RentalsHekdAftlail Laundry Services $ • • Personal Services o o Recreational FwAdao scrgpQparstlan • CIVIC cultural o 4 ° • o 0 Flood Contr UQSCor P Uf!!ty Corridor a spuba Assembly • • e o m o' e ® • m o Public Safety A Utiltyery 8ieev $ $ $ - + � $; $ + $ � � + $ � � "IP-industrial Park t31-®enaral Indmilai ul/Hp am ktiPeot tteavybmi tat" H"8von Ave.over owfilay District ep, v al yy ®NGA nn& CUP 90-13 M ION .Land Use Type by Subarea � EMMff. F SCALE- N/A f bpi" �ESpkp�lpb"N ' tL. NR� SS1pN ppNpt RLiy'SE F 1g0 PLRN��1R+ p3�R�1.p SPRpOia,PL� �,i+ Of pRtLP ut 4p�5S � RESpkhC��gpN13'EQR Fp�G'�4LZS'(LN�RpL LLCy@kR�QQ R� .i�ER FFwLt�p 1Np�5S NG FL�p Sy�aoceq� 5 ;C 54pRRpCR�S po CN? for thitle. o al tio pse 503 � Zti 5�Z0 Lg [ ica � t the cO�aiti®o t 1pp13 ZOg', app 4be8. �i 'ct ;the . . RPP" ea ah -sr"', SO a SO" Or, o the has.fi13 astioo n CO }ariog on 0 itals• iae+ Lit oN0 his "Reapplicati0 a ` he 1otiOr f Rec �eai.R Perm it t nthe p+: th ices Resq P• pse fter to as lgg M1ot this �i� Ooal reioa rea play, ably t sate• On °f the Gowan, sti e 5 ref e� ;rd aal�a cte�4 on a �hE.aaoPt� 4 tine ,k. Pee m t re4ue pn c, a�d sa;d rea,t@y Prior to re50,vea by l§1Rana�e 400°lU ere4u's ea ay: facts Gi pli`ation Rll legal pr fo��a,. ngamas fol hat ala��CO ect•sioo ap �iiiu red• hereby ho G�ca l .f ra re true is GOON itt 11 have �ccy°1cti0�' MORE+fie pity bl °f ka "sQef Res�t®� rtea to ia��o ss°� ere R/� � of t. reby this �ese lggp Cow g. vok. sSiol\ yi61A °{ 8elvice ay 23+ . this a .yQyt e Gc his Par evj e M ry th ian 1ao°'n9 ,pis eG,tals+ taotialearirg te5t� catea pNSrr Cnt1y . Oo sub�blic;th pub arty lOfGO s,cU foc h ea. °Q ocea Cher w tq 9 as taP51 aaa" va aot; set S. o e�pe t �1q�s'.. a4P%Ne, ko0 S�bare to 's a+ t� tre a{f rep°as fq atwo Rveoo�ja1 ct s{ t lay' te�aa a°ri oral s 1� tioas he aQp fii�era+a� ZhBust the Sub Q va Snmvlti• an ec�Y1ca lad 1 vested Sell orth °fco�sisthe west a sP St�etty Zoa a\,a oat the n. yite ty to , of Sth grope Nlair9y. arty of thae pr°pet iae °� h bu r°Q th th I `'eVe1 pea pit `bl etc ec�uc r+ ana 4 a °rty iy a cop ayt A the u the �Os laid arty t boils pr ap ytrial in 17 I K 4 PLAWad CogmssION°RESOLUTION NO'. CUN.90-13 - MEDI-RIDE, INC. May 23,1990 Page 2 (c) The, application contemplates the, e3tablishmlI of an medical transportation service which consists of a diap'atch office, automotive storage yard.'for` ar fleet.<of 3T;: van's,,,;.and rei'ated 'vehicle i�a:intenance facili ties" located in'the:southerly portions of,the site with;>a.:t'atal leased. area of 5,780' square;`feet with an addit onal 9',0Do square. feet o. pa,tdtior =_ ?arking area .for vehicle.storage.; (,d) Such` automotive fleet; storage is nat,'a: perasitied. or conditionally permitted use allowed within the' Subarea 5 . 4rsuant;.ta the Industrial Area Speri"fic Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial eviJence presented"to this Commission during the above-referenced 'May 23; i990 hearzrtg and upon` the';,;specific findings of fact set forth in paragraptt3 -1 and .2�",above, this:Commission hereby rinds and concludes on the merits af'the� pplicat on as follewsz (a) That the .proposed use.,is, 'not'M accord with. the General Plan, the objectivos of the Indusi:rial Specific Planfrand the purl s of',,the , - district in which the site. is located. lyl, (:b) That the proposed use,'wi�l be detrimental;to the public. he0th, safety, or ':riei.fare or. materially injurious to'...prop improvements in the vicinity. { ' (c)', That the proposed use does not compl. with each, of the t ` applicable provisions of the Industrial. Specif;r Pla,n.. .;., 4_ Based upon.the. findings and conclusions ,set fOrtit fin. paragra04 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies'the'appiication:; <" S. The Secretary to this Commission shall ,.certi fy to. the, adoption of this"Resolution. APPROVED AND,ADOPTED THIS 234tD DAY'4F MAY, 1990. PLANNING'COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry' McNie , Chairman ATTEST• Brad Buller, Secretary r ! it A! f r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIOP NO.- C-.CUP 90-13 - NEDI-RIDE. INC. May 23,,1990 Page 3 lI, Brad Builelr-, Secretary"ot the Ptannln� Commission ' he City;of. iRat'ct►p r'- cucamonga, do; hereby..certffy that th�-�.foregoing- Resoiution was du1`y' .and regularly introduced,'`passed • and adopted by- the, Plan nin " Commissio.ri';of the City. of'Rancho Cucamonga; at`a regular,meeting�of,t6e Planning .Comrnissi"-held on tine 23rd•vday af,May, 1990, by the follea►ing vote to-to RYES: COF4idISSIONERS.` �� r _ NOES: COMNIISSILINERS: ABSENT: COM ISSI'ONERS.--` s. _ tik fE ;f A U _ _ 4 l f wi s.. .•rKVY. I �.j � �): ` ;1 •�' t"..I �� tl'� soar" N TI,r 1 ' 1 I [�--- -- {------ aIT' NIH i E------ — — i4. I, ------ --- ----- r � •LCl' 1 w n I t ✓✓h it J r s _ a' a LAND USE ISSUES Th•a management of the Pierre Biane, Winery and Medi Ride, Inc., concur wiL:. the staff that Automotive '.,leet Storage best describes Medi Ride's operation and use of the land. Sub4rea 5, conditionally permits impound yards, trucking firms or automotive storage, but we f e that Medi Ride is much more compatible with the present activity on the property than the conditionally permitted uses. We hope the Planning Commission will allow them to locatE here. They are an ideally compatible operation with the property's current use. f ".:�'T ��E •.;fir =�n+�,� * _ � .� , BIANE -7ti & -� BIANE _ _ { J, REALTY Inc. 10013 E,8th Street _ Cucamonga,CA 91730 n 714/945-2152 FAX7141945-9456 PEN J �� G a i# .1 . , "Jig• k �'� =, �. 'c.,,>Tr * ,>�'�* � '.j N'``try •� r 41 ' PARICINc�4ISSUES_ In the 'lnitkii .applications there,ver'e one hundred and"forty .three (143)., not one°hundred and thirty y(130 spaces 'proVided. To -ensure''that'al I°of the vans would Yee parked in one area. an additiciN l nine. (9)''speces' have al.so,, e6n added since the pi 3nal--application: N The current existing.uses, are quite different Trot the Gity's`'staffIt undeistaeding .and ealculations,, ' especial•ly;manufacturing. There'is.;ope machinist-' operating-out of 3060 +square feet. The_`e, zs 'na other', manufacturing on the,subject'pioperty.•., � r F' � PA'RKING. CRLCULATIONS r. . RR1ANII -1 'PROPOSED t` (MEDI RIDE, INC.) PARKING SPACES ,' "'SPAWS`_ 54.- FT. „ RATiO R QUxRED VROVILIED xTQxAI; RALFYInc: OFFICE 1024 II256 . 4 10013E.'SthSt!6o ,. > Cucamonga,GA 073b WAREHOUSE 4623 ]/lDDO 5 5 f `2`1*945'2152_' • .A FRk 7t4/445-9456 ' AUTO STORAC';' NIA 1/1 37 -17 46 EXISTINGTENANTS O-rICE 3006 1/250 12 12 CONTRACTORS N/A's;' NIA 6h 6 �'.. STORAGb 'XARD k•` WAREHOUSING 69645 1/1000' ''70 70 t MANUFXCTURING 3000 1/�500 ,6' 6 A0,10 SERVICE '300.0' 1/400 7 z0] TOTAL." - 84292, 147 ADb12'IONAL ' `PARKING,•, t AVAILABLE 5 5 TOTAL 15 12 { 4 4^ � G. CITY,OF RWClio CUC: tVIONGtiI. STAFF REPORT 3. DATE May 23, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members,of the Planning Commission F2.0M: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner,.Associ'ate Planner SUBJECT: MEDIAN QPENING POLICY A. revision to the P 11 lanning Commission Median pening Policy based'. on City Council direction. I. ABSTRACT: This item is returning to the Commission .For,revisions in -order to _make the Median Policy consistent with the. City Council decisions of April, 4,_1996. II. BACKGROUND: On march 14, 1990, .the Planning-Commli ion adopted a policy establishing a minimum median ' :F:�zn to ensure,:adequate' landscaping, The policy was a result of Lewis Homes' request to have a median break--.between west,ZIm Avenue and Spruce Avenue in the Terra Vista Planned Community. The. Comaissi"on' denied' `the ` request and it was subsequently appealed to 'he City Council; On April 4, 1990, the Council heard- and upheld the applic,Ws appeal. III. ANALYSIS: When the City Council reviewed the'a'pplicant's r, ,16§t,, which was for the.'median opening on Church Street_, they,al so reviewed and expressed their concern with the median policy and in `parti,ular,, the modifications or reconstruction of the existing medians in Terra Vista. The Council did not feel relocating:and closing off ;existing median openings was warranted: "They;felt- that since the existing median .openings were;not unsafe and did not represent a traffic safety hazard, cl'ostog and relocating them was not necessary. Further.. the Council: stated concern with the cost of the modifications and the impact it would have on the _landscape maintenance district. Thes, the City Council directed staff to revisul the median policy. They favored having medians in Terra Vista reviewed on a project-by-project basis. 'Based on this ,direc1ion, the Commission may need to rescind the median- policy,and simply review.oroposed median designs in conjunction with`,development projects. ITEM.L PLANNING.COMMISSION'STAEF:REPORT MEDIAN OPENING�POLICY MY, U' 1990>.` Para 2 Staff, rotes that' the CO[Wssion policy,applied primarily to.the ' Terra Vista Planned. Community. There are ex'3 ting median:design policies for many of t)e major arterials within tte City in effect . at this time. `Rescission of policy Resolution Md. 90-,31 willtfec . therefore; impact median design in other. partt of tie City r'= III. 'RECOMMENDATIONS; Staff recommendv,,"A the Commission rescii�Q;by minute-• action, the -median �aolic'y. preyiously,t estab{�i;shed,. (Resolution No. 90-31), re and , view medians_ .with deve',p. e projects on :an individual 'basis. In the kture�� staff;.will I c rdi a plans for medians with the plans for development- .11 pr 3e for she =P?annYg .:Commission's and' Design 'Renew Co i e's review end approval. espec y s fitted, Brad Sul r . City PI ner BB:B mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - City Council �tinutes.of,April 4 1990. Exhibit "B" - Median Policy Resolution s i ,a S. k {{ 9JI , x �. city c:ouncLl kiour�og L§§- April 4, 1490 PtC}a 13 �r f Fi. S 9y rr , /� ffi. ALi&4.IG• HP..afiixtL4E. F It should be noted that Fdc*k cymar, Community Development Afxector, left the = zoom for that-discussion of Item al. 01. HOUR Mr,NINOg atra t"as Pi wxTHIN efa ,girls z.$m UAM PUNK +, i **IY M - Rn agpeal.of the Planning Commission's decision to deny a median aganing- an.Church Street betwean tact 'Elm AvQnue and Spruce avenue. (Coatinuod frasa Uaivh' 21 199QY .lack-loam, City Msnagarc, stated there in a lottot trim s wasident, Marnie a. Petrovi.sk, to be,inciuded in the xecord,' hich wilt be kept on File in the City Clarks Office. Kayor Stout asked that a copy be mada,,Ior the City Council a n4 be evade ;art of the recaord #or this item, and that he aaosld chars it with tke Council tonight. Staff report Lyraivented by Sratt Horner# As®aciatte vxarneier,° xayor stout stated that accarding to the diagram an thaw wall, it has the grange data that say those median be'saks are to be deleted, and 'kad what, that meant. Brett Harney.,,Associate punaer, stated that aR:tha Maralh 1s.P1ann£ng coy ission meeting, when the•Planning Co"ission adopted Mara policy.i.or than minitu6 mcadian longths, they also Wxectod at"Z to corract sixo� of the,,a+xtating medians that do not meet the policy �n *rraa;:Vista Parkway and Churcke Stxaet; City Council Minutes April 4, 1990 Page 19 . Mayor stout asked who would be. responsible for paying to remove the medians and having them re-landscaped. Russ MaguirQ,,City Engineer; stated that it would depend on the particular'area and the development status of that area. Councilmember Brown asked how much the people will be.paying for the renovation of the medians that. do not most the policy. Ruse Maguire, City Engineer, stated he did not know the answer to this at-`.he moment. Councilmember Buquet expressed concern for making someone go back 'and filling in the medians retroactively. Mayor Stout opurod the meeting for.public hearing. Addreszing the Council were: Don Thompson, kr�uris Hcmes, referred to a letter dated March 13, 1989, signed by Bill Silva', at that time the'Deputy City Engineer, regarding the Church Sheet medians master plan which was approved prior, to them starting the medians in Church Stre:at, and stated :because of this stptement made in the letter, that is why they sr1k,. &ling the Planning Commiesion's decision. He also referred to, a meeting between Lewis-Homes and City staff whereby they, would be allowed on® mid-black median break on Church and.Terra Vista Parkway.` He also referred'tro page 186 of the, agenda which described Commercial/Mixed U>e Access, which he lfelt was an important cart- of-the Terra Vista Plan. He also axp erased his concern about delays in the project because of this situation. Fred Aguirm, expressed his opposition to the Planning Commission s decision. He later referr,�d to a memo dated January 18 fromilrad Huller, City Planner, tc Shf.'ntu Bo w, Deputy City Engineer, ;regarding prr.?Osed denial of tha median break au it relates to safety, and pointed thi&-out to the City Council. Tom Dallaeuill, Lewis Homes, stated he was the lands'ca�y� architect for Lewis Moms, and explained he did not feel the deletion of some of the trees wound ruin the acithetice of the landmcapLaq. There being no further response, the public hearing wam closed. 'I Mayor Stout, stated that now with the master planned communities, the idea was to get theme,kinds ,of problems ironed out in the beginning and then design the project around it. He felt that now, for some o I roam n, this is bask, 50e through the process, and it was being decided that it was now.not a'good idea.to ego it that way anywore. 8e felt it was a good idea to change e6math Aq it it related to public safety matters or something like that, but did not sea that issue here. He statexd. it.makes hire think that.the Planning'Comeseis®ion wssn,t,caistui' ®Hough when the designed the project. He felt this harrta the creditability of the people who approved the project in the beginnings, but 'added he would not approve thim now as,it wam'submitted them. City, Council-Minutes r Al.,it h, 1990 Page 15 Cnuncilmember l3uguat stated he felt W.;en this project came before the council it was their,intent to take the traffic .that normally ands, Up on, tha,main streets, to bring it in as soon as you could to deal with all the traffic impacts and internalize the whole process. He stated he felt-it bothered Terra Vista:and Victoria when there is a tendency to bring things:back to the Council on the`planned communities, which was well intended, but'the Council should keep in mind there wan a vexy urge picz0xa that wan planned and,for thwr; sub- optimize not to' b- { optimize too much, ;* Councilmembor:Brown referred to the policy before them and the staff' report` dated February i1, page 3, where it,was stated to the.Planning Commiaaion't At ` they have three tllternatives She stated 'her pr®f®rant® Gma,;nurer 2,.which states.,to continua to review proposed median openings on aproject-hy-project basis through. ;hr�technical'and design r®view committee prcgasa. councilmembor _Alexander stated h® felt the public safety issue previously brought up is ,important &s they relate to median breaks. Counc£imamber Weight stated 'she did not think a maintenance district fee should be tagged on to some of these people. She felt maybe the Council should be looking at the Planning Commission's whole policy, not just one aspect of it.; mayor stout pointed out the issues were: 1) Serra View median'cpening, 2) this a cific ap peal ppaal and policy affect as it,relates to rotrafittittq, and 3} if ' the Council wants to 6ecema involved in the policy itself. He stated hd did net feel the Council was competent to discuss the policy;Lanus at tonight's m it eating, and asked that' come back a later time if the Council wanta'to look"at it. He added he did not feel that strongly about £t. ' MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by ®uquet carried unanimously, 5-o. to'uphold 6ho.app8al. Notion - Mayor Stout pointed cut that with the actica thg Council has taken, ataP" can take it as direction that they.were;.not interested in closing the medians at this time. Runs Maguire, City Enginoor,I stated that 'based on the Councilts:aotion:they would go back and amend.the map to bring back to the next CQ',ancjl maeting to get ti%e£r approval. Mayor Stout felt the planning Commission should be made aware of how tho`Cit Council feels about the median break Issue. y Russ MAqu£re, city Enginear, stated he understood the direction, to be to sot aside this plan and let it be projct-by-project.. Cavncikacmber® Wright and Huquat felt-if the policy issue beQ= a prablom, the Couciail could get involved at :that.t7=. CouncilmOMbew Wright stated she still felt the Council could end tip buinq the a board an median breaks.appeal „ . .. Mayor Stout stated the Council is a very strong supporter of -tha Planning Commission end the.job they is _' ,r.ng, but atated if, he worts 'eitting`'on..the, Planning Commission at thU tiae,•=he would disagree xith,what the policy,sa£d. Hey did not want. them to gat the wrong idoa what, the r6uncil f(At about, ttis', policy. ,M1 t 6jy � I RESOLUTION NO 90-il' A RESOLUTION OF THE-PLANNING COMM'SSION_OF THE CITY OF,� RANCHO CUCAMOj�GA CALIFOo3NIA, "ESTAB,��ISHING "q'POLICY'.FOR A;- . MINIMUM`LENGTH -0F P.EDIAN ISLANDS-,7WITHIN THE CITYt. AND FAKING FINDINGS,IN SUPPORT THERF�F Whereas; ,the P1>nning ;COmmission has expressed .�concern with the design of median islands" particular; 'the length of median islands and the amount of landscaping'within median„islands; and; ' WHEREAS, standards and policy direction is necessary to implement..the r. design goal s,of median co'r5 !' ion; and , WHEREAS, such policy 7is needed -to'^ provide clear .direction" and guidance to developers and staff,.alike. NOW,` THEREFORE, ;BE IT RESOLVED thaV; the Rancho ;Cucamonga Planning. ..Commission does hereby establish`a `policy for• mcfian de'sign;as fo}aows:" S'EC7fON. I: . Median Length Y Median 'islands shall be designed with a mi.nfmum length -of, 300 feet,, excluding any taper,,de's;ele:rat :sn, antl•stackin0istance.'. SECTION"II.: Exceptions In certain situations, ;tile minimum 300=foot`,.medi.an length may not 6e possible.' Thfwe'fore;,medians of less,than 300 feet in length may be_ permitted in the':following situations: a. In areas where"it,.becomes necessary for traffic `safety and/or., emergency vehicle access; and/or b. At mid-block, public street crossings vfiere .access is necessary for traffic`movement; a►+ /or ` c. Addacent,, to certain land Uses,' such ,a; hospitals, schools •or` other, similar facilities where..-access„ is vital,: for public safety; and[or d. Othe situations as, deemg0 necessary by the City Planner " and City,:Engineer. The City Planner. and City Engineer shall'' review .and; _approv,3 61•1 requests ;'for me�ian .'dpenings to determine i-f ` the •,proposal is consistent with the mad"ian Ipolicy: :and rhe the r -,anytof- the-,above.. `. eXceptions is applicab.le. . C Xl�/,L31T7 Jr 42 if t, = PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLOTIQN.NQ, 90-3 � POLICY"FOR,MEDIAN, 1 LANDS: March ld,`199b Page 2 `77- SECTION III Modifications to `Existino Medians. within-i he' Terra rVista Planned'Conanunty, medians{hare been proposed and;established"Whtch 'do Aot meet,the• median;Te�tgth policy set".forth tnu'this' Resolution. r.. :Therefore,,:the Planning. Commissionh ere by a'rects •the City; Planner and `City °Engineer to fifiallze'a precise master 'plan for.' medians• •within Chrtreh ;Street. and,:,, T.erra Vista Parkway. Thj; ;,master "`plan may. „j.ncludQ the._'closing` off ,o.f, reconstruction oft. and reTOcatton of existing median breaks APPROVED AND, ADOPTED THIS IQTR`DAY A, F{Ai1CH, :1990 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC}LMONGA C ;4 �� } BY: L rry T'1"iel, chairman ATTEST: r rad Se retar r I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning. Corission of theCity•of Rancho y Cucamonga, ,do,hreh th ey certif , at, "the foregoing Resolution..was' duly".'and regularly introduced, passes;,.and,.adopt 4 ;by,the Planning` Commission of the City of'Rancho' Cucamonga, at af regular meeting of'the'Planning tommisslOn"held on the 14th day,of March; 1990,, 6y the fo idwing vote'=to-wit:; AYES: . 7kAkMEYi.CHI7IEA, MCNIEL, `TOLSTOY;;NEINBOGER NOES: COMMISSI,ONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONER5:: NUKE I .. 4 il r� { � � 7•x r it F � f Y REPORT C014BINEO YiTH Ili 6 .a, r• i r., {�f y CrrY OF RANt'$ifil CL7G"ONG.si" F. . FFREPORT DATE. MaY 93. 1�90 TO: Ch airman.' hr. man ;ind '�Members�'af " e� 1 h '� } FROM; Brad Pullor. City planner By, Stevei;toss, Assistant planner SUBJECT TREE REM6IYAL PERMIT '90=£i4 �Flanging t•+ i-s LUTTRULL "� An.`appeal 'of the ; ion's "decin to re.requi 'replacement of a tree _Whi h a s eemn_u✓'"without .a permit at 6168 Topaz Street,: kPnl =351�37 'F I. BACKORDUND: In Navea�ver,r1989; a tree tri�ning company Pruned'an Aleppoipinus ha�iepr n:iis} in the City, ?parkway,at the"request Of the applicant. Time cQla:service-cutback'the tree so severely that a member of the ::��cy's iaintenance department"took photos of' , the true and notified Cade ',Enforcement staff,to vit t :the site'. On bec ember. 21, 1989, a notice of" violation; wad..issi:ed stati,r►g that the :tree had, been cut back 5o severely that the tree was" considered "removed" as 'defined by the"'City's, Tree Preservation ; Ordinance. The notice required:>the resident" to obtain a."Tree Removal Permit'froin'-the Planning T?il ision, The applicant applied for a Trees Removal Permit>,on �aguary,23, Y990, as required by Code &nor%rdement. The .:applicant asked whether the tree cou'i'd be. removed prior to approval of the permit, and staff responded' that because the tree was already considered dead, it could, be removed but'would, require "replacement through r approval of the, Tree.Removal Permit: On April 3, 1990, the Tree Removal permit was approved, subject'to replacement with a 48-inch box 'size,Ale o Pine ne, within 30 days. The applicant is appeaing"ths "replacement;"requirer�ent, ' II. ANALYSIS: Section 19,08.100 of the,Rancho, Cucamonga ,Mugjcio?j Code, requires that a tree removal "shall regyice.:�p��,, the Jar es nurser rnen with 9 y grown tree available as aeterm�ed by the ,City Planner," Research of the major tree nurseries indicated that a . 48-inch. box is typically the largest size available. The C, ity?'s Tree preservation Ordinance provides no flexibility with regard`tq. . replacement or the size of replacement tree," .1 �TEFt,N POUNING`C094ISSION STAFF REPORT TREE REMOVAL'PERMIT 90=04 May 23, 1990 Page 2 ' AIM Section 19.08.070 of the"Code States,, that "the City Planner may conditionally approve. the application.to 'remove�`a. Her,itage Tree,.,,, In addition, ,,the. , Ctv. PTanner' .may impose. conditions` deemed necessary ,to implement the. provisions of this chapter, ;including, but not limited to, replacement`of the removed or'cut""down tree or trees with trees) of ,'species and quantity,commensurate with`the, aesthetic value,, the iree.or trees cut down or removed:..." The City Planner ap&oved %the Tree Remo%ia1 Permit;; on April 3, 1990, subject-to the ollowing,cond tions;. 1. As' required b "Rancho' Cucamonga Municipal :Code Section 19.'08.`100, rIpti�cement planting is. required. One 48-4nch box size Pi6IW'halepensis ,(Aleppo Pine) shall be, planted in tfie varkwayt tc� match'the existing street t:eez. 2. The -rep laceml �'c tree shall:be planted within thirty.(30i days'.:.from t e �datb.;of this letter and °the •Plann-ing, Division contacted_for. inspection:. , III. EC ESA ON Staff recommends "that the Plannin"g' Commission uph d. t `s.City Planner' decision by ,.denying "the applicant's app a R spectf ubmi Brad But er I . City Pl nner Be:s ,3S !!! At achments: Exhibit, Vi -;°letter of Appeal Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit °C" _;Photos of,_-' Resolution of Denial V Ai . r �- fz April 23, i990 Citly� of Rancho Cucamonga ,Mv OF 6�''daHI}��Lun-1 9320 Base Line Rdr Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 � PR L>i 1990 Attention: Steven Ross1$1�)l�l).,`�•' � Subject: Tree Removal #96-04 Reference: Number 3 - Letter Dated April 3, 19-0. i In reference to number 3 of your letter dated April 3, 1990, we did not remove the tree illegally. We ,were ordered,to do so by Susan Ramarez� of the City, because she said the, t►cie was killed-when we had it cut back. I have spoken, to sevAral nursery people who at¢ Knowledgeable 'about the Aelppo Pine tree and they assured me that, the tree would have sprouted -nd would continue to live. Due to the zize of these trees in the p`erkway, the sidewalk has lifted and thereby creating a hazardous situation in that area. ThiS is evident on Mandarin between Nollyoak and Topaz.' Our street, Topaz, is supposed to have two (2) trees per house,.fgr sik—(6) houses, now there are only four.(4) t0es,remaining; on the striet. I feel what the city is :ordering us to do is unjust. TheL size of'the tree that they are telling us to plant is too large for the parkway. The trees that have been removed in other areas have not been replaced, therefore, I am filing this appeal. The enclosed check in the amount of Sixty Two' Dollars ($62.00) is to cover the appeal fee. The following are some addresses you may want to check in `reference to this matter of missing trees 1) 6317 Napa No trees 2) 61$5.Amberwood - No trees 3)' 8575 Mandarin 1 tree removed 4) $559 Mandarin - 1 tree removed 5) 6165 Hollyoak 1 tree removed ` 6) 6144 Hollyoak go trees 5i erey, L oyd troll Enclosure (1) OF RANCHO CUCAMtONGA TT M: PLANNING DIVISION TI'lu:Lortsat are Amm— �EXHIIiIT: SCALE: -^� ti i .04 HOUSEclg �, . �n will rrEm- M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TiTL.E: Se4 PLe� N PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBrr: $ SCALE: r 3� F t.,ywt f �.t S;1 V '�o n� '�.�b '�. .� fir►.^' RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CQMMISSION OF THE CITY OF j RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF TNF CITY .PLANNER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TREE REMOV PERMIT 90-04, LOCATED AT 6168 TOPAZ STREET, APN; 106P-451-37. k. A. Recitals., f (i) On April 11, 1990, Lloyd Luttrull filed an appeal of the Conditions of Approval for Tree Removal Permit 9;:-D4 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the, subject 'appeal request is referred to as the application. (is); On the 21st of December,.1989, the applicant was notified of a violation or the. City,s Tree Preservation Ordinance. (iii) On January 23, 1990 an applicatio~ was filed requesting the removal of one Aleppo Pine (Pinus halepensis) fr77_the City right-ofoway. (iv) On April 3, 1900 Tree Removal Permit 9044 was approved, with conditions. B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commiss cn'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga`as;follows: 1. This COmmission he_:�eby specifically finds that all; of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are .true and correct. ?.. Based upon substantial evidence presentad to this Commission during the above,-referenced meeting on May 23, 1990, Including' written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission,hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to•property located at 6168 Topaz Street with a street frontage of 90 feet and a Mandarin Avenue frontage of 95 feet and is presently improved with'o sinaTe family home. (b) The properties to 'the, north, south, east, and west are all occupied by existing single family residences. k (c) The tree in question was a Heritage tree• and Ak required a Tree Removal Permit. P,CANYING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. fREE` REMOVAL PERMIT 90-04 . LUTTRULL May, 23, 1990 Page,,2 i (d) "The tr was located within the City right-of,- s way " (e) The tree .was removed, as defined by Section OS.O$D of the Rancho Cucamonga, Municipal Cod, (f) Tree "repiaaement is required by °,ttion 19.08.100 of the Rancho Cucamonga 'Municipal Code. 3, ` Based upon' the suhstantial 'evidence presented to this Commission during the 'above-references+. puhlic hearing and upon the, specific findings of fasts set forth `in paragraphs 1 and 2 above," this Commission hereby finds and concludes as, follows. {a) That the proposed', request 'i= 'not consistent with the oVjectSVes of�„the General Plan; and-'. (b) That the proposed request' ts not in accord with the -objective of;,the Municipal Code;;and the purposes of the district_. in i�ftich.the site is located; and ". (c) That -the proposed,:requuest"is not in comp riance, with each of. the applicable provisions of, the, Municipal Code; and ! 4. Based upoa the fir..dings and conclusions set "fort;;in paragraphs 1, 2, and above, this .Comriission hereby denies the appeal. S. The Secretary, to t!+is_ Commission shall certi-�y, to the adrjD:i;a,^n " of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS.23RD DAY:OF MAY 1990„ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'I BY. +I Larry T. McN"Iel, Chairman " ` Al.'TESTz Brad Buller, Secretary Ji " f{ r.. Y PLFNNING`COMMISS'ON RESOLUTION N0 TREE RMOVAL PERMIT 90-04 LUTTRULL i `May 23, 1990 t Page 3 f I,, Brad 'BullPi`¢ Secretary of the Plsnning Commi&Sion of Lhe City af"gahe o Cucamo�iga, do he^eby;._certify that`the foregoTag ResoSOtion. Was ,duly ana'' regularly intro'd ced, spa's.,ed ,� and adoptel by the=?tanning,Cort�n3ssion 'of the' r` 'City of Rancho Cucamonga; at.,a.,regular,Meet ng;of the..Piao ivsg Commission held t ' on the 230d day of Flay I990,,.by the folloWing vote;=ta-tvit:' ; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: .;' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: -ABSENT: COMMYSS10NERS.: tt` i x } L` CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAM09GA ( ` STAFF . DATE,: May 23'.' 1990 TO: Chairman and' Members of the.Planni'ng Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner,' BY: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION 90-43 - SIGNS AND SERVICES.CQMPANY n appeal of the City Planners denial of the,design;o .a proposed mon5ment sign located at '9041„Pittsburgh Avenue - APNr229-262-14., I. BACKGROUND:- ::The applicant has" .appliod for a Sign 'Permit; to construct a monument sign on' Pittsburgh :Avenue.' The­ miats all technica? sign ordinance requiremsats. However, staff believes it does not comply with the,design,'standards,outlined In I, tae Industrial Specific Plans the Si r Ordiiiaoce, '<and 'recent direction from •the Planning `Commi sion9relatinn to signs ,rdithin the industrial area: Staff subsequently denied the application when the applicant=decided not to-modify the design of the sign to comply witii the City's desi n cri:teria. The proposed monument sign measures approximately 3 feet by 8 feet (Exhibit "E") The sign is mane from an aluminum can, with'the full face being a white plexiglas with slate blue vinyl logo` and letters. A dark grey acc. 't stripe will be applied to the face. Hence,:the entire sign.fade is internally illuminated' (not dust the letters);, II. ISSUES: At issue is the applicant's proposal for an internally' illuminated "can" 'type monucm`rt sign.,: Illuminated, signs are typically only approved for commercial uses', such as retail markets which operate at, night. ' Industrial warehouse,,' and manufacturing , uses have typically not been approved ` ror illuminated signs because they do not operate �at fright and do not need to be identified for non-employees such is customers .and clients ' The Sign Ordinance contains no direct standard'relative to' the issue of illuminated- monument signs: Essential' ',.signs must be o.¢ a. style and design, which i"s harmonious with the build"ing's architecture.' The 'lndustrir` "-pqa Spe;ific Plan reaffirms' the intent` of the Sign Ordinance o;r '-ragt i"ring that "signs shall be'- ` _ used for the purpose of identificati6n and .direction." ' !a 4 I1U.Q PLgNNi9G CIIMMISSYON STAFF j[;EPt1RX. y 90-45 -SiuN PERMIT'APPLICATia May 23, 1990 Page 2 Q x Prior'to denial .of"the proposed sign, staff-recommended than-the internal,, ilium�rtat; aliriihated.,� 1dowever,- staff suggested that if. illumination was .desiredI the sign.shouid=be illuminated by ground-mounted:.1ights, or by' back7,3t lettering. When the applicant ;decided against modifying the""desigr��,, the, tpplicat. was dented. Staff',ngtes that only-'one• ocher monumonf sign exists on Pittsburgh Avenue ,north of '6th. Street; and `that,. sign is itluminated'by ground-mounted lights° In a, similar case, regarding irternally;il7umina,ted wall signs°for E Fontana Steel, she ;.Pla:sning Commission denied •.the ;appeal, and :• , uphela: stafi's derision to deny .the use of., internal • - illuminatton Yri their,deliberatjbrm,�.the Pianning'Commission concluded that tn' the industrial Area it;Would, e moire `appropr ate to use; externally i'Iiumi,nated signs ., The Comhission felt. that_ internally illuminated .car+ signs,'-e dare approprfAte or retail.T` businesses ��that a're. open ,' at ;night: The. ComrSission` voted unamimo'usly .to;-deny'.the use.:of internalJI'l iminaLionz' III. RECQMMEtdDAndN t Staff recommends' that the Planning. 'Coftl 'ion u,rhOld .the City Plarinei^'s decision'and deny the applte �'s appeal through adoption of.the attached Resolutirsn.of Unial Res tj ra 8u1 City niter BB:SR:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "All Applicant's; Letter of Repeal Exhibit' "B"' City°planner Letter of Denial �, Exhibit Site`Plan r. Exhibit,°E° Sian'Elevatfons Resolution,of Denial t, a' 51 SAS AOL 1098D Boatman Avenue - Stanton Califomia,iV680,• 714/761-8200 Fax 714/761-Z451 Contactors Ucense NrA1439$78 lb u .v:'1�'v4Mr. April 13, 1599 t 1aJ!Y is ' a' The City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320-C Base Line Road .* P. 04 Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91729 k. +' Attention: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner RE SONDCO GRAHAM COMPANY MONUMENT SIGN Dear Mr. Ross: We are requesting an appeal for" the signage at Sonaca Graham Company'. at 9041 Pittsburg Rancho: Cucamonga. Sonoco Graham Company is a tenant and' not the property owner. The company will not be occupying this space permantely.. 11 a concrete Monument sign is installed for Sonoco Gramham Company, when " " they vacate their leasehold, the concrete Monument :sign with their name will still be in place. We, are capable of manufacturing a sign can with,a concrete like finish which Can be,changed when a new tenant moves in. Thank you for your consideration in this,matter. 1# you should have any questions please give me a call. Sincerely, t t ty' 0i Benedetto Production Coordinator 4F RANCHO CUCAeMONGA ITEM,� 'PLANNING 7f1VG KTI5IC7N ITru:Affixooaxsat- EXIiXBTT: SCALE: -: r� # QCITY OF RANCIiO'CiJCAMOIYGA NO Office sox Sot,itanSho cueamonga,Califotnla 91'?9,t7i+)9 April 26, 1990 Ms. Patty.Di Benedetto Signs and Services company 10980 Sontman Avenue Stanton. -CA 9,0600 SUBJECT: SONOCCO GRAHAM MONUMENT SIGN SIGN_PERMIT APPLICATION'90-45'. ' Dear Ms. Di Benedetto: Your Teeter of appeal and fee regarding. the above application' has been received by the PlanningDivision, and,the :item`has peen,scheduled to be heard III by the ,Planning Commission on May 93, :1.990. 'A staff report;.will be.mailed to yqu once it is finaltud. : Your application to construct a sign for.;the Sonocco Grzham Company At 9041 Pittsburg Avenue,was denied,by"the Planning staff Ion March 22f 1990,when,your company decided not to modify the design-of the s9gn;to meet.'th4 City's design guidelines for the industrial ,area Recently, the Planning Commission has developed a policy on signs in the ndustrial area. This policy holds that if illumination is, proposed, the preference is that the sign be ha,-klit` or illuminated by ground mounted Tights. it is our feeling that internally ;iIIumina.ted .channel letters or "can-*_ype" signs, while used in commercial areas,' are not appropriate for the industrial or office area o`f Rancho.Cucamonga. ': Please do not hesitate to `cail me or the project planner, Stevt:n Ross, if you have any questions,. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNIN DIVISION y Brad uller City Plannwr BB:SRis CITY OF s_RAritCHC) CCTCAMC➢ITGA " TrciE;�� k'r TrnN'G DMSION .EMAM je, SCALE: --► r ti " n '� d•�+ Par, t Pot'.t .� r`�4 35 4 0 ? H 1 13.32 AC o z2.09 AC SIT: , O Qct !�3�9 '., .G.S .ti*o5�.y.,� • .� Ifi jN salit.v���c: `'� a, a 1--vAvr tv OR•;—� w � Pml. x,n tr Pat:2, Por. O s a tAOAC , C p , Par. 2 t *796 AC. ® v Par.3�� ',; eSr 'o It 1196 AC y l26AC F -Sf1 SYR€E +sbq jz.L se t .I i.6�liG.t7 I204 ✓, � i li ,.+��,• Par2ti�, t + . 1.69AC' a V a 20 d SA SA �ztt fi . Par.6' Po.3 �Par.l M93AC 241.6'; 21 1.47 Ac o AC •jy „ I Peir.l4 „ l3 N �3S? 4 5 22 G 6.706AC ;.94AC 165AC Par.2 Rae.A `d Par, 7 n © .PAr.f. !e 13.774C 0 9.794 AC. a i a b 4.502 AC .'g V• � sr.aa s.. ' 6.:T.G7 .367..oG 7i+Cis, •alr�° - .� } mR 7 >i7' �. 1 �o.s.�,.�e.��s�- ✓dq} $ dlT.O Ni bi �. ,��, ..:�� � Ip V° Parr Poe.�' SI �: { Rar.i' `v 1.479A-- 2.295AC A 3:46 .s,3TAC on ,?iSAP �p,.rk 3IP.lS , 14• �p'w t�OB 22G7A: r.MAC' RANCIIO CIJC AMONGA PIANNINIG ,I3IZTiSIC3N T1 PI,E. L� . .., EXHIBIM SCALE: `' -�•' tlli'! Ii II:;t, I Elrit � I SIG jai ••r - 1 � r 4 a o I E I, R I Y•i ��� ._lA � i ;� �, � gel .s� �• TITITI TI crrY ,ovcxo .cvc�vloG ' PLAN�lTII+G D TTTd. : Pia >r7CIiIBY'Ti SCALE: OL a ,! ' ' tcza } r ' .4 H t4 ! z In th Ix fa t U «1 j' c m �• ata y ta i OF'RA CHO CUCAMONGA TTEIvfl: PLIING I}IVISI€ak� �`TCI.E• RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CONNISSION OF` THE CT-:Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,-'DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE CITY 'PLANNER'S DECISION TO, DENY"SIGN PEONIT W. g0-45, " LOCATED AT 9041 .PITTSBURGH AVENUE 1N"t THE ,'GENERAL, INDUSTRIAL, DISTRICT OF 'THE INDUSTRIAL 'SPECYFIC SLAN (SUBAREA 10), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF:'= APN: 229-262-14 ,• A. Recitals. (i) The Signs and Services Gompaeiy has filed 'an appeal `of the denial of Sign Permit No. 90-45 as described in :the..title of this. Resolution. Hereinafter, 411 his .Resolution. the" sub3ect appeal request is referred to as "the application." On April26, 1990, the City Planner denied Sign ,Permit No. 90-45 due to its inconsistency, with. the Desisa Guidelines of, the industrial area, the Sign Oedinance,�ana escent Planning Commissiop"direction,, (iii) On the, 23rd day 6f flay, .1990, the PTdnning Commission tf:,,r the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the. application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iv). All, legal prerequisites prior 'to the. adoption of this,.- Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolution. NOW THEREFORE, it. is hereby found, determined .and resolved-by the;. Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission h-er6by,specifically finds tha*=a11 of the fackm, set forth in the Recitals,.Part A, of this.,aesolution ar`e,,;`crue and correct f 2. Based upon substantial evidence` preserved to this Commission .y : during the above-referenced meeti, On February 14;r1990, including written C aiod oral staff reports, this Comnistiion hereby spec"fically finds.as follows: (s) The application' applies to property ,' 1'ocated at 9041 Pittsburgh Avenng-..with a' streef•,frontage of'722 feet and lot`,depth of 410 feet rnd is presently improved with a manufacturing facility; and ('b) The property, tg. the n©rtn of the 'subject site is used.for; distribution, the property', to tne: south, of that, site consists ;of aL manufacturing plant,,the property to the east is used for distribution and the property to the yest�:ts: used for distribution. J 1. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION MO. SIGN PERMIT'APPLICATION 90-45' MAY 23, 1 990 Page 2 (c) The appliication contemplates construction of an internally illuminated aluminLam can monument sign, approximately 3 feet by 8 feet, with a white Plexiglas face and-blue''vinyl ;copy. (d)'' The 'subject propzrty and surrounding properties consist of tilt-up concrete industrial buildings. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific rihdings, Of facts set- forth in•paragrapps 1 an6 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as f�ilow: a, That the proposed request'. is not consistent .-with the objectives of the General Plan, and b. That the 'proposed request is; not in accord with objectives of the Industrial Specific; Place and the :purposes of the distric, in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed request is not consistent with !,he following objectives of.the Sign Ordinance: (1) To provide a'high qua Iitg'visualifenvironment;-and (2) To enhance the economic value of the community"and each area thereof through the regulation of, items such as size, number,,. location, design and illumination of:signs, d. That there; are alternative sign designs that would allow; the applicant adequate business identification. . r 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions se`."-16rth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the appeal. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this .Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23'RD DAY OF MAY, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF,RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY 3 .; Larry T; MCNiel, Chairman ATTEST• Brad duller, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. � if u` SIGN PERMIT APP41CATION 94 95 'MAY 23,, 1990 Page 3 I, Brad Buller 1i Secretary of the Planning-'Commission of the Oty of Rancho Cucamonga, da "fiereby certify that the, foregoing Resolutian was Bury and regularly introduced, passed .and adopted by the Planning Commissi n of :the,,, City of Rancho Cucamonga; at'a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held =' on the 23rd day of May, 1990, bX>; he %TTowirsg vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS \43 n NOES: COMMISSIONERS; Q t ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS F Y- f f CITY OF RANCHO C.UCAMONGA STAFF REPORT r DATE: May 23, 1990_, T0: Chairman and`Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller,"City Planner BY Otto Kroutil, Deput,•;City Planner SUBJECT: USE DETERMINATION 90-03 JAKUBIAK A, request for Planning Commission's .confirmation of staffs• ,use interpretation involving Muntz Stereo, 8269 Foothill Boulevard. I. BACKGROUND: Staff has received a request from Mr. Jakubiak to operate a retail l store at 826" Fdo1. l-ill Boulevard (southwest corner of foothill. and San Bernardino Road).. The proposal f involves the retail sales of records and tapes, CD's,-players, car eadios and other accessories (please see attached letter,_Exhibit nA°). The property is designated Specialty ,rommere,al (SC) in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Thh'.,' SC designation allows record and tape stores as a primary use. The building in question is an older, non-conforming structure of about 700 square feet, which had been used by a number of bum Iesses. The mast recent user was a bail bond operation,'a vse which is not,permii:ted in the SC district. Because of previous discussions before the Planning Commission involving this site, 'staff is deferring this use determination to the Commission for action. II. ISSUES: With the adoption of the Foothill Boulevari Specific Plan in 1987, ra* l aild use regulations and development standards came into effect. A1`t properties within the boundaries of the Specific- Plan are subJec•k to these new development regulations. If and when the property owners decide to develop (or to. redevelop) their properties, they will need to comply with the development standards in effectat the time. In the interim period* developed properties may enerally continue to be used, in one of two ways: The first option is the continuation of a pre-existing, 1.igally established, but now non-conforming use. Even though the use is no longer permitted by the current J ITEt4'P PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT USE DETERMINATION 90-03 - JAKUBIAK May 23, 1990 Page 2 Am zoning regulations, the use is "grandfathered in" and may continue operations. After that use is discontinued for more than 180 days, new uses must,conform to current zoning regulations. The second option is the establishmc,at of a use permitted by current regulations, provided the structure and site lend themselves tc such-a permitted use. I a y proposed ' g w n question The retail sales activity ro osed for the bui:ldir appears consistent with the second option,,.;as a ►�era,itted. use. However, it needs to be emphasized brat ` installation of accessories in vehicles, outside storage, and other outside business activity is NOT ' permitted undEr current zoning regulations. For information purposes only, it should also be noted that future requests for modifications to the building or site which require Permits may 'trigger the requirement for compliance with current dErelopment standards. III. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Cimmission confirm . staff's interpretation of the use regulations for, the 5G district, stipulating that: 1. Retail sales of records and tapes, along with ancillary sales Of related items constitutes a permitted use, in the SC district. 2. Outdoor activity such as storage and installation is not a permitted use in this district: This action would allow the owner a reasonable use of the building, consistent +with_current land use regulations. If and when new development/building permits are requested. development standards in a ect at that time will apply. ould he ission concur with the staff's recommendation, minute cti is.all that is required. Resp ctfui itted./9 Brad Buller City Plan r BB:OK•s' Exhibit "A" - letter from Mr. Jakubiak Exhibit "B" - F,S.P. Use Regulations` 8269 F6othill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga...Ca. 917 aR,,„ Rpri 25, :1990 Egad Buller City Planner = Planning Di�partment- .City of Rancho,Cucamonga, '. F.O. Bo;: 807 Cucamonga, Ca'917?9 r RE: . occupancy of" 82$„9 Foothill-Boulevard , Dear Mr. Buller I -am writing to you at rite request of my, landlord's attorney. The purpose of Lthis ltette' as it was explained td%me, is to state my intentions about,�;hy use of the property located at`9269` Foothill Boulevard's at the+ intersection of 'Foothill 5ou1"evard"antl San Bernardino Roado a•, it is my intent to use the premises which I lease from Mr. John Upton for the retail sale 'of records, tapes .,compact discs, car radios, `car -tap e, players, !;car L CD players, car.telephones, car radair eetectors, ,And othar; automotive „ electronic accessor es..' 'There will be, no coinpl ex i,ti'atal Vat ions i . of these accessorise at this location. If m!% sales staff o* Z can walk to a customers car and. insteii a device' in tem minutes or less, such as by' mounting.it on the sun visor"and plugging it into the cigarette lighter, there "mav be some "incidental , insallation work".,--- We w�il1 not be instal Iini car radios, car " telephones, and•'the like at thi.s 'location. I have .a seperate` facility where true installation services will occur. Mr., Upton's, attorney informed me that if I`,;,made the "above ;,, statement, the City',would deem my`nsage of- the prap?rty in, Upton's ,gr«ndfather's rights s or a a question as within Mrr ` lawful use within the Specialty Commercial, Zone and .;'?at I wi1,1 hereafter receive the cooperation of the •City. I 4'm'de"pending on this as I embark'on the development of my, busine/`ss at-thi.is location. If".4 do have the cooperation of the C +"y, I will re-submit my application for: a" sign permit: andy�s„ wi.11 remove nonconforming signs. J I request a replyr to this letter. r% Sincere#y?ia ®R. C�' Eam'" /n Tony r'�siltgtR*' Q C�: John Upton AP, ) 4 f r rY • D R . 9.3 SUBAREA d IE The fellewing matrix establishes the uses LAND USE.pEGU[:ATI®!d s ' which`are permitted W; conditionally i permitted I,d)', or, not-permitted in eac 91 3.1 1� 0 the five affected land uae subcate- Primary FunchionlLacatio:� go.^ies ,, Subarea One Is Ic;catddr contiguous to.the NOTE: Site Development Standards i Foothill Corridor between. Grove and ('Section 9.3.3.Z and .9.3.3.31 shalt only Vineyard Avenues. . Subarea One wiiiV act. apply to shed-d areas. as a major gateway into-the community, ' dominated by a Specialty Commercial Activity Center, (Foothiii and S:;n. Bernardino') designed as:the primary activity center within,-the subarea, Tn PI U. 47. X. i L a r 00 SUE' EA 11 ACTIVITY TER AFC n,hw-{h 9.3.2 Permitted and tonditionai Uses: Retati Commerc ,'l4'USos Land Use SC CC '0 MR P,' Antique SFops -- Apparel a) boutiques X X b) general X X Appliance Stores.,(major) X Art, Music, and Photographic Studios, ., and Supply Stores 11,X' X Auto Service Station 0 0 Auto Service (Including motorcycles.'' boats, trailers and,campers: a) Sates (with anclllai-yi repair_facilities) L b) t2entals 0 c) Mime Repair (does not loclude }- ;. major engine work, muffler shops,' painting, body work, upholstery, etc.) 0 d) Zoin-op Washing e) Automatic Washing Pa►i:iE and Supplies X. Bakeries (retail only) X' X Barker/Beauty/Hairstylist Shops X X Cocktail Lounge(bar:lounge tavern O.' 0 O Including related entertainment Bicycle Shops` X :{ Blueprint and Photo Copy Services ' X X Bed & Breakfast 0 07 Book, Gift, and Stationary Stores X'_ X X (other than adult related material) Candy and Confections X< X SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND AT LAND;USE RECULit9N SUBAREA { t 9 r_ Retail Qmi rcial 'us 3 - Continued Land `'.Ise Sc CC '0 _MR P 4 o�nvaieicent>Facilities r)nd Hospitals; Catering Establishments xx China and Glassware Stores X Christmas Tree Sale§ lots' Operated one temporary Basis - ) X" •. Churches O O. 0 Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X Commercial Recreation: a) Indoor use such-as bowiingr billiards . 0, 0.., b) Outdoor Iuses such as tennis 1 and basketball 0 0 Curtain and Drapery Shops' X Day Care Centers 0 0 0 Delicatessens and. Spec,alty+` Food Stores X X Drug Stores and Pharmacies X Farmers Markets i ) X Floor Covering Shops X Florist Shops, X1 X Furniture Stores X X Hardware Stores X Health and Athletic ,Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics X C Hobby S; ops X X ice "Cream Stores and Soda Fountains X X Janitorial Services and Supplies, X 4 e r• Re li cial UVA Continued I Land Use 5c: CC O MR P Jewelry Stores Laundry (Sc!f Service) X L,-.wher Goods and Luggage,Stores xi X Liquor Stores O p Messerrjur and Wire Services x }� fMusic, Dance.. and Martial Arts Studios,, O x Nk,\wspaper and Magaa9ne Stores X ;f X Nurseries and Carden Supply Stores Within Enclosed Area- Of'ic".. Business Machine.and Compubar Component Stores X ,x Paint, Class, and Wal:paper Stores X Pet Shops x' x Pn �tocopy (XErOX) x x Record anti T40 Stores X x Restaurants (sit down): 0) With ehtertalr.,ant andfor the servIrg. of alcoholic beverages 0 O D b) incidental serving of bear, and wine (without a ::ocktall lounge, bar, entartalw* nt, or dancing) X X O Cafe, limited fcf 30 seats (including outdoor seating) x, x x d) Fast Food lentil drtve-thru). ,O (without drive-thru) 0 O Shoe`Store* and Sixty Repair Sleeps x x Specialty Retail p p SUB-AREA DESICN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION AP t , w � y y Retail commercial Uses - Conslnues$ rv' Land Use ; CC O MEN P` port rx1 i s tores ,r at Soec€kity; baekpackirg, tennis, skling,mm nwn- eeri g, fishing, b) Cener,ai;, enc©pastIng a X variety of-sports egruipmerA X�� Supermarkets X `. Swimming Pool,Santices and Sales } Tailor S�rps X X Tolevislon, Radio, VCR, Stereo and CD Component Sales ' X I., Toy Stores X X. Variety Department Stares, Junior Department Stores 0 X Veterinary (domestic); a) Arlon-boarding X p b) Boarding 0 Watch and Clock Repair Stores X X Yardage Hoods Stares X Entertainment and Cultural Uses - Land U,...sa SC C'`, fii MR F Arcades Cultural/Artist Exhibits: a), Indoor gallery and art sales X, 6 11 = b) Outdoor art exhibits X 0 Discotheques t} 0 Theaters: a) Dinner theatm 0 0'. b) Movie (multi-Pl'.yX) q { I !�i ,ry,� .°wR'"xw'wi+nrwgearrruw "`7 1 Office and Administrative Uses Land- Use- Sc CC 0 MR P Administrative, s ness, an Professional Office X' X X ' Business and Office'Services X X X Banks, Finance Services and Institutions_ ' h. Without drive-thru X X X With drive-thru 0' 0 0 Interior Decorating Firms X' X X Medical/Dental: Offices and ' Relateo' Health Clinics X X X Optician and OptometrIcal Shops X X X Realtors and Real Estate Offices X, X X ;Travel Agencies X X X Residential Uses - Land Use SC CC 0 MR n P ng a -Family Detached left Single Family Attached (duplex, is iplex, fourpiex) X l Multi-family Dwellings: X i) Ancillary Residential Uses 'T o�me-care a�tles _.L} (6 or less) X b) On-site private rocre'ation facilities. X 2) Accessory Uses a) cassory structures X b) Home occupatiaVi' X Publ is Use Land Use eC; CC O MR P Public Utility installations_ 0. SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND [.AVID USE RECULATION- UTY 4F RANCHO,CUCAMONGA f STAFF REPORT DATE: May 233, '1.990 ?0: Chairman, and Members of the Planning Commission =' FROM: Brad 'Buller,;Cfty Planner 8Y; Dan Coleman, Principal- Planner SUBJECT: _VICTOR & GARDENS SUD�OMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS � ;I I.. RE f'OMMENDATION: It i`s recommended" that the Planning Commission appoint a subcommittee to continue, tOrking with the project J architect and :06e flahn Company on the design :concepts for tho 31 1.; The subcommittee should consist of two Cnis ion s and aii alternate. q Re ectful bmittQe- ,i Brad Bull r l City Pta ner r c BB:DC sp . r 7 R � �