Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990/09/26 - Agenda Packet0701-02 09 -26 -90 PC Agenda 6 C' My OF y R 414C HO CUCAN1 0 MANNING COMMISSION 1973 WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 26, 1994 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMGK CIVIC CENTER �. COUNCIL CHWER zOs06 CIVIC CEWER DRIVE RANCHO CUCANDKGA,; ALIFORNIA I. Pledge of AIlegiance II. Road Call Commissioner Ciitiea Commissioner Tolstoy '�` Cormnissioner,AcNi.el Commissioner Weinberger Commissioner Melcher r! 171. Announcements XV. Consent Calendar -� The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted on by toe Commission at one time without discussion* If anyone has concern over any item, it should be e. moved for discussion. A. SIGN PROGRAM FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -03 - WHEELER .ND WHEELER ARCHI7ZTS Review of a sign program for a +etail center and service: station In the CommuW:y Commercial District (S0area ` 2) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Flan, located at the southeast corder of Foothill Boulevard and Yi:;eyard avenue I APN: '205- 392 -06, B. VACATION OF A'TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR RETENTION BASIN AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES FOR TRACT NO. 13425 - A request tor, - vacate a temporary easement for grading and construction' of a retention basin, earthen berms, and 'drainage facilities located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and 29th Street. APNt 202- 232 -ors. C. MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE 'TRACT 13527' 14ATT INLAND' EMPIRE - Submittal of a Resolution confirming a Planning Commission decision to modify a condition of approval for a residential subdivision of 231 single family 'lots on 115.48 acres of land in the Low Residential Distrtat (2 -4 ''dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street - 1( APN:,, 225,- 071 -65, (Continued from September 12,'1990.) D. DESII:Pi. ^r;'7IEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14379 1 PHASE OF y;i TRACT 1y6 27 - OVERLOOK. HOMES- The dCsign review of building elevations and detailed site plan {' 'jr, a previously approved tract map consisting of 35 single family, lots on 13.48 .acres of "land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) located at the, northwest, corner v; ra4th Street and Etivianda Avenue - APN: 225-- 071 -65., E. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIV;` TPACTt 14380�1438i. 14382 3 PHASES OF -TRACT 13527 '�._,I�ATI iNLA.NB EMPIRE The design review of building e►evat,�' S and detailed site plan for a; previously approved tentative tract :nap " co;.cisting of 152 single family lots on 51.6 acres ofj land in the Low Residential District (2- 4.dwelling units,' per acre) located north of 24th Street and west of Etiwanda Avenue APN: 225 - 071 -65. V. Public Hearings { The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals 'may voice their opinion:, of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after spearing. F. TIME EXTENSION AND MOD`rICATION TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13527 - WATT INLAND E%?IRE A request for an extension for a residential subdivision of 231 single family lots on 88.48. acres of land in the Low Residential: District (2 -4 dwelling t!nits per acre) located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street - APN: 225 - 971 -65. j G. TIME EwTENSION AND MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS` OF APPROVAL FOR ;D VELOPMENT RSV EW 85 -42 TOFF - ,A proposal to construct 168 apartment units on 9.03 acres t*f land In the Medium - High - Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) located north of Base Line Road, 550 feet east of 0*-�y Creek Channel APN: 227491 -21. Associated w-Ah the project' iii Tree Removal Permit 87 -67. H. ENVIROWIEN. "AL ASSESSMENT AND CCNDITZONAL USE PERMIT 90 -27 - 1YTERNATiONAL TITHESS CONSULTANTS " - A request to establish a' fitness center in 'a leased building of 18,30^ square feet within -an existing business park, consisting of 4 buildings totaling 95,500 sjuare fee3,, located within the Office Professional Jevelopment Dis,Zrict of the Terra Vista Community, Plan at 10641 Church. Street - APN: 1077- 4k -30,' " I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11287. LEWIS HOMES`- A subdivision of 8.053 -acres of land into I parcel `in the Parks District of tha Terra Vista Community Plan,`, located at the northwest- corner of Church Street and Elm Avenue - APN-. 1077 - 42141. J. ENVIRONME17rAL: ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA "COMMUHITY PLAN AMENDMF.HT 90 -02 - G ?TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -F A request to ' amend .,the density provisions of the Victoria Community Plan to require changes in land use designations to be approved by City Council. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 90 -01 - .CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - request to amend the density provisions737 the Terra Vista Community Plan to require changes in land use _designations to he approved by City Council. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 90 -08 - BROCK - A request to reduce the minirtium net average lot size from r 22,500 to 22,162 square feet and to reduce the minimum lot depth of Lot 1 from 150 to 120 feet�for a 40 lot subdivision on 25.9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less, than 2 dwelling units per acre) located east of 'Haven Avenue and north of Ringstem Drive - APN. 0201- 121 -24. Related file: TentaAve Tract 14771. ' M. ENVIRONMENTAL' ASSESSMENT 'AND TENTATIVE TRACT '14771- BROCK - A residential subdivision of 40 single famijy lots on 25,9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) located east of Haven Avenue and north; of Ringstem ,Drive - APN 0201- 121 -24. Related file: Variauce 90 -08. N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL 'PLAN AMENDMENT 90 -OIA - SHERWOOD' - A request to amend the General elan Land Use Map from Flood Control /Utility, Cd.rridor'to Low r Residential (2.4 dwelling units per acre) for ,1.92 acres contained within two parcels of land located north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue, adjacent to the erst side of the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The Planning Commission will also consider 0.ven Space and Very Low Residential (leis than 2 dwelling units per " s` acre) as possi rl e l and use Alternatives. f APN: 201- 200 -37 and 1062440 -57. s ', f 7 O. ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 90 -01 - SH_ERWOOD - A request to amend the Fr: Development Districts Map from "FC" Flood Control to "L" Low Residential (24 dwelli'nq units qer °acre) for 1.92 acres contained within two parce:3 of land located n1krth and south of an extension of Highland.,Avenua= adjacent to the east side of the Cucamonga 'Creek Channel. The Planrt'ng Commission will also consider "`OS" OPen,;Space and 1AL" Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre' as possible land use alternatives. , APN; 201 - 200 -37 'gild 1062- 540 -57. i , P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:' Al SPECIFIC PLAN 89 -01 - CONSORTIUM OF ETIW. NDA dORTFLANDOWNERS P A request to approve a Sp=iflc 'Plan for 5,080 dwel ling units, 9.6 acres of commercial, and related school, park, and open space uses on 6054 acres of land_ generally iacatej north of 24th Street with portions north of Kighland ?` Avenue,, south of the ,National forest 3oundary with portions within the National Forest, east of the extension of Milliken Aventie, and west of the Fontana City limit._ Q. ENK20NMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 'TENTATIVE TRAPT MAPS 14493 THROUNl "'14498, 14522 ATib 14523, A!V ENNTATIVE 1'9:RCEL MAPMAP 13128 - REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSIj. 1 0, LTF H R AND CARM DEVELOPMENT -, A request for approval ,,1s.'seven tentative tract maps and one, parcel map.for_6.,°, dwelling units, a 9.3 acre commercial site,,. 4.4'._ are park site, and a 7:17 acre school site or ;approxim,21y 179 acres of land located general %, Borth of Highland Avenue,; south, of a - Southern Calif,�nla Edison utility corridor, west of Hanley sdenue with portions west of the future bay Creek Boulevard. and east of Cay Creek wash. VI. New Business R. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 90 -09 -`CITY OFI RANCHO CUCAMONGA - t: Tha "proposed development of an 11,105 square foot animal shelter building on 0.9 acres of land as part of the << City of Rancho Cucamonga's Sports Complex facility, k located at toe- northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Arrow Route in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Indu3trial Specific Plan - APN: 229- 011 -22. Vii DireeitoF's Reports S. RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE - Review of current City € regulations affecting storage and parking of RVs on private residential properties. (Continued from Julj 25, 1990.) VII . u ission :Business �, �� Y� DATE: TO: FROM BY: SUBJECT: I. II. lu CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 26, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner SIGN PROGRAM FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-03 - WHEELER AND WHEELER ARCHITECTS Review of a sign program for a retail center and service station" in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 208- 192 -06. BACKGROUPD: The subject retail center and gas station proposed for the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission on September 14, 1988. The project was approved subject to certain special conditions which included a condition that a uniform sign program addressing all o:; -site signs including monument signs, wall signs, directional signs and service station signs -be subject to approval of the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits. ANALYSIS• General: One of the primary concerns has been that a uniform sign program for the project shall complement the architectural style of the building. The site is located within the "Vineyard Activity Center" of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. This activity area has been planned to be pedestrian oriented and- correspondingly greater attention has been given to architectural theme and details to make the center conducive to pedestrian activities. The sign program responds to these criteria. Gas Station: Signs for the gas station consist primarily of two State required monument signs, one on the Foothill frontage entrance and the other adjacent to the entrance on Vineyard Avenue, and a wall sign above the main entrance at the street intersection. The wall sign "and the monument signs tie in well with the architecture of the center. The two monument signs (Exhibit "A") emulate the building construction materials through the use of rough sawn wood beams and wood cross members shaped to reflect the building's exposed rafter tails. The -wood . construction frames the two -sided Mobil corporate sign and State required six -unit price sign. The bases of the monument signs TIM" t A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -03 - WHEELER AND WHEELER ARCH. September 26, 1990 Page 2 IMF ` will be constructed " of the same native river rock anc precast : concrete cap as the raised planters on. the perimeter walls of the building. The wall sign over the main building entrance consists of an internally - illuminated Mobil corporate- symbol, the pegasus, without any letter signs. The symbol has been proposed alone to elicit an historical feeling in conjunction with the shed and barn style architecture of the building reminiscent of the early Route 66 era.- The remainder of `:he signs for the gas station consist of small required directional, safety, and informati {final signs around the gas 'islands. Retail Center :. Signs for the retail center consist of individual internally illuminated upper and lovier case souvenir dem.i style letters. These signs will be used to identify shops within the retail center. Shop, identification signs are proposed to be located on the parapet wall above the store fronts on both the street side and interior parking 7ot side. of the building with the exception of the Mobil Mart sign which. will only b located e acate o t P n he 9 Y interior side of the building parapet. A low garden wall monument sign identifying the center is proposed to be located at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. The sign would be precast concrete for durability and would be an integral part of the corner raised planter,. Design Review: The proposed sign program was reviewed by the " Design Review Committee on June 7, 1990 and revised plans were reviewed on July 19, 1990. A their July 19 meeting, the Design Review Committee (Chitiea, Tolstoy and Kroutil) approved the revisions to the sign program for the Vina Loma Center which addressed the Committee's concerns: 1. The •cord Mobil Gasoline and self -serve should: from - the Brice sign and the price sign and brand name sign should be reduced in size, thereby lowering the height of the whole monument sign structure. _ 2. An alternative design for the Mobil logo sign at the corner above the 'entrance should be considered in conjunction with a reduction in signs for the Mobil Mart. The si4n should be an individual letter style sign not a can sign. It could be >` designed with some historical significance and it could be a' symbol without corporate style lettering. `, The sign height should not exceed the height of the other tenant wall signs. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -03 - WHEELER: AND WHEELER ARCH. September 26, 1990 Page 3: 3. The Mobil `Mart sign, if used, should be of the same Letter style and size (maximum 12 -inch height) as the rest of the tenant gall signs., 4. The letters for the garden wall sign at the corner should be made from a durable material and fastened securely against vandalism. A cast concrete letter sign With or without up- light illumination is acceptable. III. CONCLUSION: The proposed sign program for the Vina' Loma Plaza addresses all' Design Review Committee' concerns, and meets the intent of the City�s uniform sign program criteria and the City's Sign Ordinance while .allowing the fexibility to meet State requirements regarding gas station, sig.'s and the basic criteria for identifying tenants within ,a retail center combined with a gas station. The proposed signs also adequately complement the architectural program. IV. RECOWENDATIOV: Staff re- -mends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed sign E ram through minute action. Aft Re Ily e Br' Bu r City anne `i BB:BA:sp i Attachments: Exhibit "A" - :Sign Program 1 Submitted By: Al Salgado ' Wheeler & Wheeler Architects Inca 133 Spring Street Claremont, CA 91711 INDEK ARTICLE 1 - Introduction ARTICLE ii - Approval Procedures ARTICLE III Common Area Signs ARTICLE IV - General Sign Criteria ARTICLE V - Tenant Storefront Identification ARTICLE VI Tenant Store Number ARTICLE VII - `tore Hours /Entry I.D. EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 1 Site Plan- Indicating Sign Locations EXHIBIT 2 Building A & B - Detailed Elevations EXHIBIT 3 Canopy - Detail Elevations EXHIBIT EXHIBIT 4 5 Service Station Monument Sign - Detailed Landscape Site Plan Service Station Monument Sign - Detailed Elevation EXHIBIT 6 Service Station Monument Sign - Detailed Landscape Site Plan EXHIBIT 6A Service Station Monument Sign - Detailed Elevation EXHIBIT 7 Building "B" (Tenant "1B ") Wall Signage- Detailed Esau Elevation (West Wail . °_ ge Similar) EXHIBIT 8 Latter Style - Souvenir Dsmi /Photo Sample - Color and Style EXHIBIT 9 Channel Letter Details, Specifications and Cross Section EXHIBIT 10 Comer Tower - Detailed Street Elevation EXHIBIT 11 Building A & B - Enlarged Detail Elevations of All Minor Tenants EXHIBIT 12 Service Station Canopy - Enlarged North and-South Detailed Elevations EXHIBIT 13 Service Station Canop+ - Photo Sample of Adhered Signage to Mufti -Fuel Dispenser EXHIBIT 14 Service Station Canopy - Enlarged Detailed Elevations For West and North Elevations EXHIBIT 15 Street Comer Raised Planter- Enlarged Detailed Elevationand Cross Section of Backlit Letters EXHIBIT 16 Building Address - Detailed East Elevation (Similar for North, South and West Elevations) EXHIBIT 17 Photo Sample - Photo Indicates Service Stations Color and Letters Style EXHIBIT 18 Parking Code Sign EXHIBIT 19 Tenant Stortfront Signage Details EXHIBIT 20 Public Restronm Signage 147"gn.44 SIGN PROGRAM ARTICLE I - INTRODUCTION The purpose of this tenant sign program is to establish an approved set of criteria and standards i that comply with the Sign Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. All of the contractors and tenant of Vina Loma. Plaza will comply with the provisions of the program, as approved by the City of Rencho ucamonga. The program is also to insure that the service station Identification sand price monument sign Is installed and maintained in accordance with the City Sign Ordinance. ARTICLE 11 - APPROVAL. PROCEDURES All tenant signs installed or displayed on tE,e premises of Vina Loma Plaza must have written approval by the landlord and (as specifie j by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The esthetic characteristics of the signs, eg. piacoMsGrR, spa proportions, color, texture, and graphics are subject to the discretionary approvA of the landlord, within the context of this sign program. Tenants must submit three (3) sets tane'in color) of professional executed sign drawings which meet the City of Rancho Cucamonga, submittal standards. These drawings .must be subs fitted to the landlord for revicm and approval. After the drawings have been approved by the landlord the tenant is responsible for submitting there to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and obtaining the required approval(s). ARTICLE III - COMMON AREA SIGNS Common area signs will be approved by the landlord and maintained by the landlord (Mobil Oil Corporation vrll maintain its monument signs and public restroom signage). 1. Retail Center Identification 2. Parking Code Sign 3. Building Address ARTICLE IV - GENERAL SIGN CRITERIA 1. With the exception of the major tenant (Mobil al Corporation), ell tenant signs Q--31 be wall i mounted. Ground mounted or freesiand in g signs vaili not be allowed. 2. With the exception of the major tenant, the maximum number of signs allowed per tenant will not exceed two (2). 3. Roof mounted signs will not be allowed. 4. No sign will be painted directly onto a xall or suftc a of any building. uT t ".t4 5. ' No signing is permitted which does not directly identify err relate to the primary service of function of the tenants activity. 6. Maintenance cf each sign is the responsibility o� the tenant who installed it Le*4er forms or fetter faces which require repair will be replaced or rspalrad within thirty (30) °days of damage or notice from landlord. If the signage is not rect;Tad within the thirty day period, the landlord will repair the sign at the tenant's expense. 7. Signs will be free of ali labels and manufacturer's advertising with the exception of code requirements. Banner, pennants, or temporary signs may not be displayed on any buiW. ,or in the parking area, and temporary signs may not be placed on the inside:surfaues of any window or hung closer than ten feet (10') behind the inside surface of the window without prior approval by the landlord and compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 9. Cooperative tenant seasonal promotional signing will be permitted only upon review and approval by the landlord and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 10. Upon vacating the leased space the tenant will be responsible for the removal of all the signs installed by the tenant. Upon removal of the "Tenant Storefront Identification sign the tenant must repairthe wood fascia by filling the holes and restaining the area to match the existing fascia color, and ;f required by landlord, replace T & G planks to match wood fascia. if the before meritioned repair has not been completed ten (10) days after the tenant has vacated, the landlord will execute the repair of the fascia at the tenant expense. ARTICLE 1/ - TENANT STOREFRONT IDENTIFICATION These signs are categorized relative to design of the center and the configuration of building. MAJOR TENANT I.D. (EXHIBITS) 1. The major tenant is defined as Mobil Oil Corporation ocr -o,';ng "1 BO of Building B. 2. With the exception of major tenant (Exhibit 10), the maximum allowable letter height is not to exceed ttyelve Inches (12') for a single fine, cr not to exceed the maximium sign area (Indicated on the elevations contained within this sign program), for double line copy. 3. The maximurn allowable sign area is not to exceed 10% of the building face to a maximum of one hundred and frity (150) square feet. The sign area will be calculated by creating a rectangle around the perimeter of the individual letters, then multiplying the length by the width. G MINOR TENANT IDEI1i'I FICATION 1. A Minor Tenant is defined as any tenant occupying a leased space in either Building A or 9uliding B. 2. The maximum allowable letter height Is not to exceed twelve inches (12% the minimum letter height is not to be smaller than six inches (64). 3. The maximum allowable sign area is not to exceed 10% of the building face, (approximately 45 square feet). The sign area will be calculated by creating a rectangle around the perimeter of the individual letters, then multiplying the length by the width. 4. BWding A and B tenants are allowed a maximum of two (2) signs as shown on Exhibits 7, 8, 9, and 11. MAJOR AF -0 MINOR TENANT STOREFRONT IDENTWICATION FABRICATION STANDARDS The following standards further specify the design and production requirements for these sign types. Along with the requirements of this section, the tenant must also comply with all the requirements outline in Article IV "General Sign Criteria). 1. Tern3nt store,`: ont identification signs must be fabricated as internally illuminated channel fetters. Cabinet or exposed neon signs, or Nvor' -of -art° signs will not be allowed. 2. Letter and logo forms are to be fabricated from sheet metal into a pen channel configuration with a five Inch (51) return. The inside of the letter or logo iorm is to be painted white, the outside is be painted dark brown. 3. Letter and logo faces are to be febricated from 1/8" thick piexiglass (min.) or aciyllc plastic and be attached to the metal return with trimcap molding no less than 3J4' wide. The trimcap color is to be dark brown (typical) or gold. 4. Tenat.:a Kr ;ri existing established logo graphics will be subjeczto City review and approval. 5. Internal illumination to be 30 milli -amp neon tube Ilghting installed and labeled in accordarce with a jL (underwriters Laboratory) standards. t;. All pernTtrations of the exterior fascia are to be sealed watertighht, than painted with the color to match existing fascia. 7. Tenant storefront identification signs are to be connected to an Maned J -box provided by the landlord, which Is connected to the landlord's pause panel with a dedicated time clock- ,aref 44 e In no case will there be any exposed electr' ml raceways, conduit, trap" formers, junction boxes, cooductors, crossovers, neon glass tt lbing. Exposed hardwaro will be finisheid a manner consistent with quality fabdcat'.s o practices and the installation will be approve by the landlord. 9. The tenant will be fully responsible for the operation of hla sign contractor and, shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Lm Owner and his agents from damages or liabilities resulting from his contractor's work. 10. All signs and installations of signs must conform to the appropriate building and electrical codes. The tenant and the sign contractor will obtain any and all permits , ,requl!'sd. ARTICLE Vd . TENANT STORE NUM9ER. (EXHIBIT 19) 1. Each tenant must install a store number, as assign6d by the landlord, over the entry door. These numbers must be w Nte vinyl machine -cut numbers, six Inches (60) in height uti]Wng the project typestyle "Clarendon 6o;d ". The numbers arc to. be installed centered both vertica!ly and horizontally within the glass panel area over the door. 2. Refer to the design drawing contained with this sign program designated as Exhibit 19 for layout example. AWICLE W; STORE $E41ilPJF/ENTRY I.D. (—C.XHIBI1 -!a) 1. Each tenant is allowed one (1) information sign at the entry to their store. The copy f this sign is restricted to pertinent business information such as store hours, teleph numbers, emergency information or other business instructions. i 2. This sign is to be white vinyl machina -cut copy In the project typesiyle "'Clarendon Hold" or Heivetica, applies to ther inside of the store window adjacent to the entry. door. 3. The maximum are?, aliowed for thK sign it 144 square inches and the msx;:mum letter height allowed is two inches (2 "). 4. Refer to the design drawing contained within this slCp i program designated as Exhibit for layoLd example. } 14786gn. Ct �: •ap lunaaotu.p ewa.arivad rou.� 1 umsp vmol ruc 1 ww r 1� I U11- ES j Ea cu cy Or Y� i 1 1 °� i hiS Y6 t I. �IY Eiti i -� �; �Q L-.. tom=' •,{ <3 �G�; •I ' w,oa L3 I � d -. ®° 'Q � �•�� a �Ya' � JC 3�' w 1 rr 7 TT �` W 9 pp "_' -� _ .mss 4 '' �,-•, jI 1, ya• at• :ar • /•,� W...Pal.. /0 W Jolueo � a W �- s HIS � 3 w X1 0 rT r 9�0� $8� s �M•4N w � sl � a- � .� _ _ Q ri i w a•Y h• r'O s H *� � B 1 is I i0k 4 1 11% s 4 L, 0 v w g; B it .1 f s 3a i 7 1 I �® t r ,i of 7 r. E till f� ' lit. lip R lit' r-- - --- --- CAIMA' MLSVATIOW Werttls M1NDlrrbil.tPt+r9rtelR /W.. l OfRY (Is .q Rut /AtfaM 6AM3t/ -7dflt te its "�2 �i8 °�� ► LCD LLJ X6 �� L i 04 c.0 •'r OL ;• w LU t 1p nL ND �9 � t • i • � q�' it U . �.. u F.{ I { • � 4� d 1 s l if i ' t 0 sg J •� r� .d, s a'= LU :lz 4M• c140" LL-3 - LU LU _�. yob N `.A -H -1.5 o a __j t tj LU �l LLJ . LLJ J �l J w e , i i � i i CSI I m %A i! X11 r LJ E rc 1 72 � DILI Ct1 n N k 71 %1 l�Jv it _k N cif a i � �V � 4 �Sl �) -t8 �► tll i �oo' v sal V on tll � cc Cy MOD L' ..a o d roa s r^ ..s W '� U =W-- ow va OL 43 is -A t A UL 'TtCL a f aat Ic A-?Lk:ll %a: T<- m -�7 =- a 4 F-- J4- -- t 0 ram LLTv LEI KA, ?4A IIq G N e c 0 a� S � i C �� ml fi �n All- Ys KA, ?4A IIq G N e c 0 a� S � i C �� ml IL �} Cie W ti I LU LU Q, G -7 s r� t ����� �— S �� � rr,.. "'�', I! . .ate a► S 81 ►1 \� .. � � ^� ��`� . . .. «� -e� - �.s.. -. �/ «� . .� �. ���. .... � . ... 2���. \ ��:�\ �\ } �� / ? �: \� . . .� � 2. 9 , �� :����� d \ / \} � }� \® � « » � . m\� : � . : � . \ � /� \ / � \ � . x« \}.� - m «z� ��� ,yam � : \\ \. : � � ��� \\ � \\ � :.: / >/\ : y���� � . /�.���} \ yz ? d�� � \ } � � � � � � � /yam \ §: . � . � :�� » »� \����������/ . . � ~ \� \ \� � \� - � � � � � ° ^`^ � 7� < � � � � \ / �. .: � : \ � /,�\ \f\ . � � \ � �_�� � �� \ � � � S <�: \\ z+� � �� 2& ! «r ^ .v . ®�� a�: cy � � \ \ \\ �xyr»x> »< : » v- >y� � � � :� � . ���� �� ,. : �. . ., � � � � � \ �� � �\ � � � � � \ �.� ^` \ � / \� «� � _ � �?« �?\� \ \22�{ � � � \ � � . $ , i I . x Al� i Z n a K . ,. . , .1 11 m s�- i lam aim i I . x Al� i Z n a K . ,. . , .1 11 m s�- i It 10 ol QL -- -1 I Ll�.`_1 t! ]. t L .;`•� eb�l O ®� j� oil fi e � a 11 id K. iet q^ S Q w tam• ®- t- e-yy V Its — ;._ , --- i .,.: :t , 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT x BATE: September 26, 1990 TO: Chairman and Misers of the Planning Codanission FROM: Shinto Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Willie Balbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: t�ACATIQN tiP A TEP�ORARY EASEiNT I L�R RETENTION BASIN AND l.' reques vaca e a temporary essertsen or gra 'n9 and consiructign of Retention Basin, Earthen Berms and Drainago Facilities located on the xouthst t:�rner of Highland Avem:g and 19th Sti -ae a BACKGROUND /NIALYSIS On April 9, 3486, the Planning Cowission adopted Resolution Flo, 86 -38 and approved Tentative Tract Map NO. 12952. As part of the conditions of approval of said Snap, a temporary easement for grading and construction of retention "z4n, earthen beans and drainage facilities was dedicated to the City and recorded an November 14, 1986, as document nO. 86.- 339287, Official Records of San Bernardino County, California. Thqq, Deveoper, Glenfed Development Corporation is requesting the' vacation of said temporary easements since flood protection measures wets: completed and the temporary easement is no longer needed. The subject temporary easement vacation is des, -Ibed per attached Exhibit "A" :and is located at the sout:mst corner i; highland Avenue avid 19th Street, RIM TION: Staff recommends than the Planning omission make the findinq that the vacation of the te rary easement for grading and construction of retention basin, e4rtin berms and drainage facilities conforms with the General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval. Respectfully submitted, SB :WY: jh Attachment 1 I EXHIBIT "p•' LEGAL DESCRIPTION. �Temporary Easement for_G_rading and Construction of Retention Basin, Earthen berms. an aaTnage r5c_ t es Being a portion of Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, more particularly described as,fallowsi' Beginning of the Northeasterly 'corner of Tract No. 4587 as recorded in Map Book 137, Pages 90 -92, Records of San Bernardino County, California; thence along the Easterly line of said tract South 00 24' 55" East 892.40 feet; thence South 31° 40' 17" East 60.00 feet to a point on a curve concave to the East and having a radius o` 20.00 feet with,- a radial line through said point bearing South 31' 40' 17" East; then along said curve through a central angle of 87' 46' 06" an arc distandii 38.88 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave to the Nor,`aast and having a radius of 20.00 feet; thence al -ong said curve through .a central angle of 92" 06' 54" an arc dist mcef, of 32,15 feet to a point of compound curve concave to the Northwestand having a radius of 1,456.00 feet with a radial line through saUr point bearing North 31' 33' 17" West; thence along said curve through a central angle of 16' 65' 52" an arc distance of 430.25 feet to a point on a tangent lice; thence North 41' 30' 51" East 544.46 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave to the Southwest and having a radius of "1,344.00 feet; thence along -said curve through a central angle of 280 27' -42" an arc distance of 667.63 feet to a point on a non- tangent line with a radial line through said point baaring South 200 0' 27" East,_ paid Point also being on the Southerly line of Highland Rvenue (66 feet wide); thence along said line South 890 27' 52" West 1,331.21 feet to the port of beginning. j I i a r, L J /i�OtN{ of QX�'aWNtAI�' �c err Fot' Aew�tta>�c . / �'�+,�3�i`'. of 9,a<c:vtli'+atS ?C�t►5�,� T3afchl Pa�Q►•A9 +� tr+ y�p,.dtE.ip,�e t;Z�.GtI.►Tt�. n� .� =f. L4,�VCG 17ATA CY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I �g i /f ®f as LEA imm. N ME rrm-lv* to LEA imm. e D14 i E: TO: FROM: BY: SUVECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STF DEPORT September 26, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Betty Miller, Associate Engineer to modify a cc:?.dition of approval for a r.,sidential subdivision of 231 single fasily lots on 106.45 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at the northwe t corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street - APR: Z25-WI.- 65 I. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS: On September 12, 1990, the Planning Commission heard the applicant's request to modify the condition of approval, requiring private maintenance of interim drainage protection facilities by a Homeowners' Association. The developer „-- Nested that the phrase Homeowners" Association" be replaced with thti Nord °Developer'. The Comission decided, instead, to add the xhrase Nor other entity approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney after Homeowners Association", thereby providing flexibility for staff and the Developer to explore alternatives. Thr; attached Resolution reflects the Commission's decision to approve the modification. 11. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached , resolution. _ Respectfully submitted, ,e3AVul A01 1h Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH: jk Atta6hment MW C RESOLUTION NO. 88 -200A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. FOR TENTATIVE. TRACT 13527, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 231 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 108.48 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET - AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APR: 225 »071-65 A. Recitals. (i) On September 28, 19FJ8, the Planning Commission adapted Resolution Ns. 8,8 »200, thereby approving, subject to specified o)nditions, Tentative Tract 23527. (ii) On August 1, 1990, a request was filed by Matt Inlard Empire, Incorporated, to modify the condition of approval requiring the interim drainage protection facilities to be maintained by a Homeowners Association. (iii) On September I2, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public h €wring on the applicatiow and concluded said hearing on that Sate. (1Y) All legal prerequisites prior to thn adoption of this °k� <lution have occurred. S. Resoltiontion. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, :�eterml ned, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds tip, all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 12, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimonV_ this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The modification request applies to property located at-the northwest corner of Etivanda Avenue and 24th Street within the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), and (b) The property to the not +th is Lost Residential with an approved tentative tract 14339 (vacant), to the east is a County R -2 zone (vacant), to the south is Very Law Residential with a: partially constructed tentative tract 22659, and to the vast is Open Space; and (c) The revised warding of Condition No. 16 does not alte► the general intent of the original flexibility in providing main ttenanceoforinterimu Developer drainage. facilities. x PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT TR 11527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRF.' SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 PAGE 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commissi -an during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the previously approved tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and Development Cade: and (b) That the proposed modification to tract will not cause inconsistencies with the General Plan and Development. Code. and (.:) That the proposed modification Is not likely to cause public healta or safety problems. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has beer reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 ind that a Negative Declaration was issued on September 28, 1988. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby modifies Resolution No. 88.2UO by changing Condition ,No. lE under Tentative Tract to read as follows: Interim drainage protection facilities shall be provided along the earth project boundary. The design shall be justified by the final drainage study and ,approved by the City Engineer. A maintenance agreement shall be executed to the satWaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing private maintenance of the drainage protection facility by a Homeowners' Association or other entity approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney, but providing the City with the right -cf- access to maintain the facility if private maintenance is insufficient and allowinV the - City to assess those costs to the Homeowners' Association or other approv:.:' intity. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND AAOPTC"D THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McKie , Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, TENT TR 13527 - VATT INLAND EMPIRE SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 PAGE 3 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary 1, grad Buller, Secretary'.Ivr the Planning CnWkission 'cif the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Reso:tit;on was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning CC;aiSSion of the City of Rancho Sucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Gc.vi-ssion held on the 26th <,�'of September, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit- AYES: COMMISSIONERS; HOES; COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: CONAMIONERSs qF i 1 s� C W.- I DATE: TO: FROM: i Y. SUBJECT: September 26, 1994 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner DESIGN REVIEt= 'OR TENTATIVE TRACT 14379 (1 PHASE Of TRACT 5F7j OVEALOOK ROMES 7The design roview of building elevations and detailed~ site plan for a previously approved tract map consisting of 35 single family lots on 13.48 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest corner of 24th Street and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 225 - 071 -65, I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Reguested: Approval of building elevations, pint plan, and grading plan. S. Protect Density. 2.56 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Toning.:. 'forth - Vacant ('rpproved Tentative Tract 14139;, Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South`- Tract 12659 (Phase 1, southeast corner, under construction) and Vacant, Very Low Residential (less than 2 %welling units per acre) East - Vacant, Residential 2, County Zoning West - Tracts 14380, 14361, and 14382 (3 phases of Tract 13iM , Vacant, Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) 0. General, Plat. Sesianations: Project Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre East - Residential 2 (County Zoning) West - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per ,cry.) 1M.9 D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR FOR TT 14379 - OVERLOOK HOMES: September 26, 1990 Page 2 II, ANALYSIS• A. General: The site is currently vacant with an average slope of approximately' 6.7 percent from northwest to I southeast. This phase oi' Tract 13527 is bordered on the west by Etiwanda Avenue, on the north try approved Tentative Tract 14139, on the south by 24th Stre,-11i and approved Tentative Tract 12659, and on the east by vacant land within the County, but in the City's Sphere- of- Infl1„ence. This design review application consists of one phase of Tentative Tract 13527 (see Exhibit "A"), which was originally approved by the Planning Commission on September 28, 1988. Tract 135P is � :omprised of five phases. Design Review 14380, 14381, and 14382 are the three phases which are also being considered by the Planning Commission tonight. Design Review 13527 is the final phase and is located at the w ?,ern portion of the site. This phase is not up for cunsideration at this time, but will be submitted'ct a later date in conjunction with a map modification for the final phase. The modification will be necessary in order to a11vii for a larger than anticipated channel and debris basin. - The revised size of the debris basin necessitates the elimination of approximately ten lots in the last phase,. A Development Agreement (ES -01) was approved for the project on August 3 1988, by the City Council, The Development Agreement simply stated that the Low Residential standards would be followed. Additionally! the site is located in Planning Unit Area 2B of the proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan which contains specific development, landscape, and I: design standards. I Five floor plar.s have been provided, and all are two-story_ except Tor Plan B. Plan D has two elevations, clans A, C, and E have three elevations, and Plan B has fiv? elevations. Plan D is provided with a side -on garage. The applicant has chosen to provide 100 percent Monterey style elevations which are permitted by the proposed Etiwanda North Specific- Plan. The applicant has also provided each lot with frnnt - yard landscaping per the requirements of the proposed Etiwanda Nor,'. Specific Plan. B. De -ian Review Commit- tee: The Design ;Review Committee (McNiel, hlelcher, Coleman) reviewed the project on June 21, 1990, and did not recommend. 'approval,. The Committee directed the applicant to. revise their plans in order to address the following issues: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT j DR FOR TT 143,'9 - OVERLOOK HOMES September 26,'1990 Page 3 Architecture; v 1. The applicant should attempt to provide some type of roof 1 break where possible, i.e., 5:12 breaking to 3 :22. J 2. Railings should be provided. at the fronts of some elevations (e.g., D -1) to provide a sense of enclosure. 3. The applicant should try. and provide sc;tne type of sid ng element around the entry, areas. 4. Additional detailing should be provided to the rear and side of those elections; adjacent to 24Th Street and j Etiwanda Avenue. Shutters, closed false shutters, and /or additional windows should be considered. 5. Front yard 'return.walls should match the perimeter wall along 24th Street in both color and material. 6. The large window on the front side of the D -1 elevation should be altered to be more Monterey style in character. Additional planter space should be provide) between the driveway and the front of the house. Ask 7. Chimney cap treatments should be varied. 8. The Plan D -2 window treatment is not appropriate to the Monterey style of architecture. 9. The balcony on the front side of the B -2 elevation is out of character with the Monterey style of architecture. 10. The yellow color should` be deleted or toned down and the pink color should he "earthier," Landscape. -_ 1. The Engineering Division will work with the applicant to determine ti.n appropriate plant palette for 24th Strr which will be used consistently along its length in Etiwanda Borth Specific Plan area. The applicant revised their, plaes and addressed the majorf�y of the issues. -, The Committee (McNiel,. Me%ber, C- _Ieman) reviewed the project again on August 2, 1990, and recommended approval with the following items to return to the Committee as a Consent Calendar item: Ask 1. An attempt should be made to add an additional window to the front side of the A -1 elevation. D- PLANNING COMMISfION STAFF REPORT DR FOR TT 14379 - OVERLOOK HOMES September 26, 1990 Page 4 2. Driveway treatment and color should be r'.early identified. 3. The landscape concept for ?4th Street should be reviewed and approved. Plans were revised by the appli; ant and 'reviewed by the Committee (Melcher, Fieinberger, Coleman) on August 16,, 1990, as a Consent Calendar item. The project was approved with the following conditions: 1. The originally proposed window treatment for the A -1 elevation should be used rather than what was presented to the Committee. 2. One driveway treatment should be used per house, rather than combining several materials ar ;., ""posed. C. Trails Advisory Committee: The Committee reviewed the project on June 20, 1990, and approved it with the following< conditions; 1. A standard City vehicle gate with side access (step thr4) i should be provided a` She north and south ends of the 20- foot equestrian trail en Pne interior of the easterly tract boundary, 2. A 4- foot -wide opining should be provided in the trail fencing where S cimuda Court abuts the. 20 -foot equestrian trail. ,A removable fence post, mounted in a metal sleeve with an eye bolt for locking, should be provided in the middle of the 4.fooe opening. The fence post should match the fencing fdr the 20-foot community trail. 3. Trail design and materials of construction should conform to the City standards for community trails. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the proposal on June 19, 1990, and approved it on July 31, 1990, subject to the additional conditions listed in the attached Resolution of Approval. E. Grading Committee: The overall tract was approved with a - condition which stated the following: i A comprehensive grading plan _shall a submitted; for review 'and approval by the Grading Committee prior to recordation of the final map. The plans shall address the following areas; _ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR FOR TT 14379 - OVERLOOK HOMES September 26, 1990 Page 5 a. The maximum rear yard splits shall not exceed 8 feet' when unretained or 12 feet with the use of a 4 -foot retaining wall. b, The maximum side yard splits shall not exceed 4 feet. c. Split level pads, stern walls, and varying floor levels shall be i,—:orporated to reduce grading. d. The maximum pad to ground differential of external 4" boundaries shall not exceed 8 feet. e. All cross-lot drainage shad be within private easements and improved devices. The Grading Committee reviewed the Design. Review application for compliance with the condition on June I•°, and Jrlly 31, 1990, and approved it on July 31, 1990. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS.: The project is consistent with the Development Code and the General Plana The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause • significant " dim, environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use is in compliance with the applicable pr^ :sions of the Development Code and City Standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION- Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Design Review for Tract 14379 (1 Phase of Tract 13527) through adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions. ARes f y su ner ffs , Attachments; Exhibit "A" - Tract 13527 Exhibit "B" Planning Area 26 of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Exhibit "C" - Corceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" Site Utilization Map Exhibit "E" -_Site Plan Exhibit ,IF" - urading.Plan Exhibit "G" - Building Elevations Resolution F,8 -200 Resolution of Approval with Conditions gil� SI = e. � a• l� ,r. � o` � � • , a td � �? 63, � ,ji l � R!� it �I � .' •� • r- tf cl it i+' �I J lu .gM.ND nVHNUE o10uSE M nkOMA► PIM ..,. ................,�. PLANNING UNIT AREA ....,.. .............. KEY NEAP I Cam' CF rmm= - __ Abn R Ah NING DnIWV EXHIB;r. SCALE: i D -7 ter../. •��• . 1 j ►" .gM.ND nVHNUE o10uSE M nkOMA► PIM ..,. ................,�. PLANNING UNIT AREA ....,.. .............. KEY NEAP I Cam' CF rmm= - __ Abn R Ah NING DnIWV EXHIB;r. SCALE: i D -7 RIM&OA iZffjow . a , ivy IFIM am 11 m O R N t MODEL HOMES. *u 1/8 O CH sC" "Wwrs L -t L -z --} 1— i3st"Aw COUPM- Ilk r aP Fay-) i W V 4 o l r II U4. Z 4@ l V V 4 o r U4. Z 4@ l V s r �r.:: - =�:' �i �� ��. �, � . \� � � � \ N's i7i, � •y '� ` � �.:'�� r ,.. °.r.., , ir� r ?c.� T' .. � r ' ��s'�e �`' is �wt �� Yl : �:� r�-`� -��, I ------- UE R'C�- ELEvA`CN M M t.El- CMI( OF A'Ak RANICMO CUCAMONGA . MAMING ITV EXHIST--6= LI-Sr-NLE-. 1] r-] a E'-�VATVN va Di -1-2 1 lu ExHiErr. scAt.E. ITE i 12 L 1 12 '���'C�.,.1 �_..�� ". ��( @'_ i�� � " y `=771 4 �- l .� � � � �` 4 .' ,���• t a K � .•. }, 2 �.��� j. =� "� CrrY O RAM-,TD L kMONGA PLANNING D1V F 1 I IE W-A R 0701-02 09-26-90 PC Agenda 2 of 6 0 I'll 61 till ., �/ r--Iw. Ls- M, � F',", 1 ^+ a.r •s nS .Dona - ]N•TLLw 70' aUwvA ! f. .),IS -COT i.lL TYPICAL ,,. FTER —2X8 I S.. FOOT RbL ax TO wL N Ustt S I w'weanwc 1°•aO1 n. DP) 3 -NT TML. TYPICAL PAFTCB _o.•� b nOTTO. MIL NAl, uLTAIL A RAIL DETAIL 8 ft, CAP roF n.lL CAMS so" of ! naTTGM nlJl RESOLUTION NO. 88 -204 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM9ONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13527, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 252 SINGLE FMIILY LOTS ON 88 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORT14WEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET - APN€ 225- 071 -65. A. Recitals. (i) Terry Melcher has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13527 as desc.r5bed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application`, (ii) On the. 28th of Ssptember, 1988, the !Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All lec.el prerequisites to the adoption of this Rcsoluti�un have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part; A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 28, 1983, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest Corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street with a length of 3,640 feet and a depth of 1,328 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north, south and east is designated for residential use and is currently vacant. The property to the west is designated for open spce uses and is presently vacant; and (c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and (d) The development of 252 or fewer single family units on 88 acn!s of land is consistent with the Low Residential land use designation of the General Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88 -200 TT 13527 - MElcher September 28, 1986 Pcnge 2 (e) The proposal, with the Community Trail along the 'east tryst boundary, is in compliance With the Master Plan of Trails and the objectives of the Equestrian Overlay District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragrapL4 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conclu^les as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements o1 the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Develo"ent Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site Is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and ?voidable injury to humans and wildlife or- their habitat; and Ge) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The de;:ign of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. A. Tentative Tract 1. The existing overhead utilities i'elec:rical) on. the opposite side of unimproved 24th Street sha11 be underground from the first pole on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue to the first pole off -site west of the project's west boundary prior to public improvement page 3 first. occurs rezOver whichever reement to or occupancy's abMSs�nt aunder9ro n de of the develop'- e the City adopted on the opposite half of as it occurs one-half and future (electric' ic' road street. overhead utilities of ent shall on the west District easet side of 2. Tne existing onst Valfer on the sou he north County wi hi the cdasonnga the first off site north of °r be n�rset to the firs�o public ;mprov�nt project boUwhi hevero® curs first' d full width Occupancy, be constructs south road' h Street shall is along aenue (existing' o 3. twenty -fa parkway is kith Et;wanda osed). me developer st (except rom its iretersectth VL Street (Pro enpt to r If the cost of section with a reeve afi` nt as its rote est a raiaburse�!en adbed andfuture develAp MAY re4 sting the soot islands from street' of constructing n9 the median side of the constru the opposite District is required it occurs on olitan Dater the MtroP of 4. S PeY%ik within its right-of-way. and underSyshal jiGnor for +cork s tithis developer s perfopming Street constru those P 5. if the ,24th done by other ;n favor of any i ties rSi oflt agr nts utilities are 2d,� Street the work. constr+a to the ,ruction city Prior in lieu fee �t shall Via. lncludethe any estima`ed Cost 6' Est of !. p9nal l+�P be one elf tneisn. from t. of &rd 01,11►sreet /,i Z4th Stveo�boun ry including the ot� _ e0 is too 0 west pro3ec and 19hl and adequate ' Stro 24th Street and an of the tween Et; ndbE grad be d,3 c ir�g s o acing satisfaction 7. wide. sham etural tion site Engineers. in the recess r, the north t. er is unabme to obtaavenue north ex =,sting if the developer Etic® vergehCe ethwi11 be allor+ed 9. dedication to its on -site propertY l.n orarY transition iligment0 shai�l be to the as Follows. transition desi n of the City Eng al atisfact�on -Me i PLANNING COWISSViii RESOLUTION NO. 88 -200 TT 13527 - Melcher September 28, 1988 Page 4 ti b) A temporary road easement shall be provided on lot 11. c) A fee for the future removal of the temporary transition and its replacnt with ultimate street improven*nts shall be paid to the City; prior to approval of the Final Map. 9. If off -site dedication is obtained from the property owner to the north prior to approval of the Final kap, then this developer shall construct the ultimate Etiwrnda Avenue north of the, project site to its convergence with the existing alignMent. It shall be constructed full width, excluding parksay improvements. The developer may request a reimbursement :agreement to recover Vie cost of constructing, off-site street improvements from future development as it occurs north of this site. 10. Construct the City Master Plan Storm Drain in 24th Street from the project site to the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited, to that portion of the construction costs incurred in constructing permanent drainage facilities specified on the City's Mster Plan of stores drains and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of allowable costs in excess of the fees in accordance with City policy. Any additional costs for over- sizing facilities f r interim flood protection shall be borne by the developer. 11. Plans for the 24th Street Master Plan Storm drain shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Flood Control District prior to approval of the Final Map or issuance of building permits, hichever occurs first. 12. The stone drain system within the project shall be designed to accommodate flows from the property to the north upon its future development in accordance with designated tributary areas for the 24th Street Master :Plan storm drain. 13. A permanent flood protection facility shall be constructor. along the west property boundary as follows: a) A concrete channel shall be constructed, as justified by the final drainage study approved by the City Engineer, with sufficient capacity to allow extension of the channel along the northwest property line of the property to the north. It shall be fenced per City Standards. 0'9 A 12 -foot wide paved access road shall be provided on D- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88 -200 TT 13527 - Miel cher September 28, 1988 Page 5 s the east side of the channel for its entire length with access provided at both ends to a public Street. c) A permanent storm drainage easement shall encompass the channel, debris basin, service roads and fences. d) The developer shall form or annex to a maintenance assessment district for this facility. 14. If Southern California Edison agrees to the plattment of all or part of the permanent flood protections facility within their easement, a permit from Southern C+.lifornia Edison will be -required for work within their right -of -way. 15. Interim drainage protection. facilities shall be provided along the north project, --boundary. The design shall be justified by the final drainage stra nd approved by the City Engineer. A maintenance agrae%_ shalT be executed to the satisfaction of the 43ty Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing private maintenance 0 the drainage protection rdcility by a - Homeowners ;Lssociation, but '^, providing the City win the right -of- access to maintain Ask facility if private maintenance is insufficient 'dnd allowing the City to access those costs to the homeowners Association, 16. The project shall contribute to the future construction of the Etiwanda /San Savine regional drainage /flood control facilities by forcing or annexing to a benefit assessment or a communiV facilities district or by the payment of regional drainage fees as established by the City Council. Formation or annexation or fee payment shall be prior to Final Map approval. 17. Construct a 20 foot wide Community Equestrian Trail along the east project boundary. 18. Landscape maintenanca easements shall be dedivited to the L'ity for the area between the perimeter wall and the right - of -way on 24th Street, Etiwanda Avenue, and V Street between 24th and 'N° Streets. 19. Slopes wt`hin landscape easements to be maintained by the City shall not exceed 3:1, unless approved by the City Engineer. 20. Where `streets are drained to storm drainage pipes (s­vp condition) in easements crossing private property;' fie easement shall be graded to "ccept and Convey/ overrf&s from the street in the Event blockage in the pipe or catch basin. 0_ PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88 -200 TT 13527 - Helcher September 28, 1988 Page 5 21. Off -si �e improvements shall be ,erovided for each phase of the development, as required ku the City Engineer, to provide drainage protection and two means of access for each phase. j 22. The earthquake fault location and building setback shall be shown on the final map. In addition, a deed restriction i shall be attached to lots 24 thru 28 identifying the location of the fault, fault setbacks, and bu.lding limitations as approv -td by the City Planner. 23. The developer shall commence, participate in and consummate, or cause to be comenred, participated in, or consummated, ,a Mello -Roos Corsun €ty Facilities District for j Foothill Fire Protection District to finance a fire station to serve the envelopment. including land facilities, equipment and operations rand maintenance. The station j shall be located, designed4nd built to all specifications of the Foothill Fire Protktion District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by District in accordance with its needs. In any building of the statf ::,, _ .'.QVk =o° r shall comply with all applicable laws and. regulations. The Community Facilities District shall be farad, by District and developer by the time of recordation of the final map. 24. The developer shall provide each prospective hn+±ar written notice of the potential Fourth Street flock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a deposit on any property. 25. The developer shall provide designs for the ends of the cul -do -sacs to aainimize the amount of concrete and maximize the amount of land eapieg. � 26. Approval of 'tentative Tract 13627 is granted contingent i upon Planning Commission approval of a total Design Review ! package, prior to recordattian of the final map, which may Include the following revisions. i a. Deletion of one lot each at the ends of these cul -de- sac streets: Street OW, Street "P", and Street "E* b. Provision for a pasea /greenbelt system of trails. 8. Design Revue 1. PHor to recordation of the final map, a complete Design Review package shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission. 1 PLANNING COMISSI3ii RESOLUTIUi NO. 88 -240 TT 13527 - Mulcher September 28, 1988 Page 7 2. A comprehensive grading plan shalt be submitted for review and approval by the Grading Committee prior to recordation of the final map. The plans shall address the following beast a) The maximum rear yard splits shall not exceed eight (8) feet when unretained or 12 feet with the use of a four (4) foot retaining wall. b) The maximum side yard splits shall not exceed four (4) feet. c) Split level pads, �ttem walls, and varying floor levels shall be incorporal)d to reduce grading. d) The maximum pad to ground differential of external bocadaries shill not exceed eight (8) feet. e) All cross -lot drainage shall be within private easements and improved devices. 3. The cul -de -sac for Street "A" adjacent to Etiwanda. Avenue shall be designed for emergency ac�ess to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire District, 4. Lots which front onto "L" Street between "N" and "J" Streets sball have circu►ci tpreferred) or hammerhead driveways. All drive approaches on lot 100 shall be north of a projection of the north right -of -way line for "N" Street. S. Front yard landscaping and irrigation shall be provided on all cvl -de sacs. The final plans shall be reviewed by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 287H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988.. PLANNING COWMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA E)--5g PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1's-200 TT 13527 - Melcher September 28, 1988 Page $ I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that tta fore9r-�,ng Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of September, 1988, ry the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY HOES: COM+lISSIONM: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK ti a Ll� .1 L HIM5i' aga:° •a i�""Y' 8�`y`O y �S.�Yt i9 ♦ • ^ N �� .. �. R�yY y ^�i �. «r. � PY �Y. i�Y Vi CM• I a _�! .. °} y �L� {. Hp; CMwi!' Pii� a.lV O.. qy T�M'r ^�P .. yy e y ss g�8 gg `fi. S a S � ^akya ^.g °.�^ .. L�LO `jOM Yq�y�. �Yg �..�eMYMC • ,a' ^7. Y_��MNY�YV •6 �1y p��b�'''/C�� ^ar � cMN�� A pigP BN ai ^' vyr 4L� ° M OgYi.iYi >y ^`w E.o�. .Z.. �apS� 'iXX.- 'zoom, .'zoom, �. y CC cc qyN{r� ew.. • ��Y�6itl�ii� Y N`e �YC ^q YY� NM Y M�u' �'3��g°1y. ��y�$iTiN'�YYY�r g833�g i ^tl al eij$iu <•P • i Q gg Vag j 15% yy� V v^ N O iLlP�M � Z ss PY as- 4 1 ^P r p W UlV a Y M° ■ g e M • �N ��• = gs aN gg Vag j 15% yy� V v^ N O iLlP�M � Z ss PY as- 4 1 ^P Y W .s ;r r S Iga3 xY� w x_ V CO ^� w $ w .cgs . S »� g 'L�r•s a -z u a irb x952 J- sx s r:Q.s�ro w w {{w +c Mr ww ? 3 O3QS '''r0a a �� =. °� `r +.4 "33� {� .N, ■ G $off I I �g g ;zx C.a »Tf s11 r a �w e.- sty 'S i w" z. »_ x" a 9 fl1 a. ♦ys �' zan u I`a3 %I_2 j)-q 1 Visit e� i« 7 M _ e« Rhr » A's lip ate a N V — s_ N AU31 -1 M�M$ A� yMp YL _ A w �►i:'� uioq E N r SE s fig s �« �+C ilk Z T , at In vr r SMtl + «sSg as slow gY 1� 6AP Yr° �� �i_y Ar 6S YYyp M ji t S _I 41ciNita iasM HC NO 6_'r{ N� �y I`a3 %I_2 j)-q 1 Visit e� i« 7 M _ e« Rhr » A's lip ate a N V — s_ N AU31 -1 M�M$ A� yMp YL _ A w �►i:'� uioq E N "3 w W E 20, E 8G `o e5co`oCv��CC:,�gq3 ra r L$i .�qo o�cb gas $ ^.Sew •rs Sig .N q $�bo�..:a:�� « =.Li a'a.a:'Y °Qa$ ya'&S��a'�$ „pCC$ aXg&o °aog M` q 3: �LL ±OOON O ®sad i V�_OO a + M L I� 6S ° N 6 C° I g"^ y a� Y3' jm A�llCpyaly4 TyLp 4SM eC -eyr�$Sm'���°� `YpL»Q E =L N!y Xe a6p004� C • �o V,S�ai� a$ is b 6 S d L C ;I y b1lf M L L 3 y C E L ZOq u. $gLL`o. =ps” sS S ex�~ C M O ~ 1. Y Y L ° '. L� Y �I M p� IM P a a L f YYi O L VA •UOa I 1 Py° ® °� rryv��.ei °LSO ^y "� IWo a y+ ��yy qb1 NyC yy g�aa °o » ^sa oY yeb s b'* +`g `Y � 5_ gb 5 L�}I a1 r I r 3LyNMii ^rC^ aZ ap q O O �1 q y Yy � i ct.$ h�q�w NMy =oCs ®•' ++3 �iD �C�J`O Y ^a +M .i.r4 ■CM Od. M�. MO QL:L�s 40y+y' \ OI O 0 1 '�P fee sit Z -TLe g Y�C y a� legs BYO s La= Y�r3 ..Za P g • N �e �1A oP LYE: 8N V� ..gYa a � 11w Zug wx A 6 6 T 5-- 8v a � p y a •T YA •y M * ELI r y $ r • ® • �� e U S gE » Z: I y�' % Y• iL C ■ w 8TL �r N� ac- 0 D_4_7 12�� �QmmtYta +MM M� iy LA N ^ ®� a 6 in HS F YI 4' in HS '2 TL %kg $ "t� P So V s E a 28 tl�9 g1 i `O Ca y$a3 $23^ pp6`` reyy�..s f.s TL Wi "rw�� • rY N `C J W P'J r � CC yyyy �yq� c 4 gipp$ c�.o - �'Y$.a �e L. cuy_ of a.' '1.00w 4yVi 4. m Yr.Yg yLO �Y Q WAY Y 'fin+ � -2.2 ' �WG ?9�a V yN 280 �4m� COCQY yS ~}}a�k'�Q MsYy �� wY W:E ay • �sy s iDl N as r V2 y M. aa� si��ts Sv3 ftjmj a u$°g� gMm ^l`f, 3 �� C�p X L 6{yi� Z. 8 �S~� i1 MY • -4�I� m yyVC ®a i. p R O.� p. i 040dQ ®..2M IC �g y s w CM~ ~ p0yS ql •?! C ' as 3.11 a M O � - R1f Pf 4 C ri zyS� ga T O his ��� 0� �M� � •� +� ~� s$+ �'� .Styy�: DOdi rml atl- R MP GP q aa v'"3 zT Yh` � N y n j amy !�{j. Y �_ s6 It r•' a N �M oQp '��i yit C ^giiA( K. m ®Y•p �Oay or 'Is „ C 3 Lpg ■,�gpi BMW WNY SM �yYOS�l p•�wV �a11'O r 41 L IL as � y� w�� 7�•P�- 6 � W �O �R�_ �p h �mi�V•� N � "V -k 1L gw < F. �A1 <i� Oi! P ILG P�� {I.mV s °c.S gpi 132 "�g.' �a 4° gM sgx Y � T$c g Ny 'No a r'" l0NN''fi.°6.'� 3 1 S --i- «z I--, s- , all ON V 'o c �s .. � � ova aw eN� �a s Y O N: {.. C b � r m �. L w Y § rr b q p $UVoU N. Y WU �P�a.Yi �qN{w 0"Ci ■ Z ¢ " L .6 Psi gr-r $is S . II SIDwhV \Ogg. j}Y M YY! �� p V aT vYf 9� Y d d ►. .6P '^� d� ;a G'^v wrY� yU �K° A Q s q QQ q�ysa Ve aM�� �O ti Y M "..w t r e_°, �.p_MGTr��p B 4 io ft '` d °'i :3. $ °fig t'3 `1'� +y tgA•tl Y cTat3 s °o$0 3 u a« 41 a d i MR wW M. � 1 GS off' r �a'� a P� -a� �� !� ��o�p� ",Zvt� bs '14 p FS vt I as Los Jim I v =Sj St N M PS pg a¢yf L.iw Y:. p�� +•�J gyp` ;tlp Q PP� O'i s Mia 3.180 " .mil sa .s a iA% a ;::il' in - � �" ; "� �a a pp Re �t- If� P a 2 its N NTy y4 wh H qa ~o � w PpPwy� 't dd"yyV- Y � Q 6 WTE ~.ec wpb V .y ^�p Epp bt�. �N t.w a� N awa ei ire YP.g • i _ P 1 ,qq I MFM $pV OM i► ymyO{m�i uu� o dils L� N N L^ e O 6 M O s !» u .Eli 9. Mod Cz �oop+ oc� 5 ®$ lq �o I b !a --D-- �, a 'Eiio o sii _d Y al if _ ^y� lit (O� NNNN a �lee� ��li N ■ � � M g g. W 6A � + wZV p. qV YyNjeN �� &+i • �. o S Nw N.pWOr RiW 4 N 9 1 awe IF X '�'a N °LSa Oy Y «r L� L• AIL w aW V �N N s $ 6 O ^ TL YJ yy a up p s YOB` `6 G ® ®p 3 Eti sa`CYC M w a �! per°, CE Q° Qi �LLY�Y 3 �{_�,1L gY 2` L e+ a ass m f3 SSE !W Y K N Y OV Zli y .a It All ' d AyN'C Y'Is ^ My +�Y6 `Y. vy CYp 1r. El Ci. �Ym C A¢y Qs �CJY3 �GGL QCQ C L �� L it qLq. �r6C Al �Y.6�� 6 O sR g M �Y� `A �O YI p i ~�• p D� Par_5 p f�Cj A�G3 6 Y �q� Ids. O�Q; NAY MGp 11 1 yV wCA yW� a6Y'N Np 4T M�tt b�.dgqY. YC �C L �Ci1 M pbdV 69 tj yLO fM`� ^RI.T �s WMUZcu aaal � I MFM $pV OM i► ymyO{m�i uu� o dils L� N N L^ e O 6 M O s !» u .Eli 9. Mod Cz �oop+ oc� 5 ®$ lq �o I b !a --D-- �, a 'Eiio o sii _d Y al if _ ^y� lit (O� NNNN a �lee� ��li N ■ � � M g g. W 6A � + wZV p. qV YyNjeN �� &+i • �. o S Nw N.pWOr RiW 4 N 9 1 awe IF ` C� � g Oy Y b L s Y 6 TL s !W Y K N Y OV y .a It All ' d I MFM $pV OM i► ymyO{m�i uu� o dils L� N N L^ e O 6 M O s !» u .Eli 9. Mod Cz �oop+ oc� 5 ®$ lq �o I b !a --D-- �, a 'Eiio o sii _d Y al if _ ^y� lit (O� NNNN a �lee� ��li N ■ � � M g g. W 6A � + wZV p. qV YyNjeN �� &+i • �. o S Nw N.pWOr RiW 4 N 9 1 awe IF N x [V W N U Fx• �r.: S Y C O Gy Y 4 Y 6p�b y•q a �a a Ea �� a is ae4u �Y p ff o �LY ds n ' b gyro SS Y^ .0 L u o "S aw 14 "-S% 81- �bL YCCg� d�b Y MM CStZa 'NL aaggC�` H E' uy d`:si X05.. Doffff \Sn 1 `) L g• 005' � _�� B m tic Y•w � N Y b � V oil �e b we • • � �4 JIMle 21 s a s 9r b Mme. p�Y' 4 pr enw• g• Q q+ .:u p• y y Y M p p6 $a$ p. C�a.•p7� i. �yy� � Oyy 6 qq V {y� V" Y�Y `. •p S Y S i Y b y M C• R O 1 ` RU• 9 /77n +.� ; B n, 3 at :4s ILI ffi - P, 9 _p 1 �•iuq L•g 6p�b y•q �• a 5= $p�I v.� u �Y p ff o 3d IM ds ' b c2 p OMR�p. 21i UDR ia3 •�_ &. so- Ira j aw 14 "-S% ., We Y ZA M^ W LyM4 O� BHA Y b� q61 �pI M.p.P °C �w� •yam. g� �.�usJ $O.ir 6F e•i6 1 A RESOLUTICN NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE P1,MNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ti RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRO1tING DESIGN REVIEW' FOR TRAr! NO. '14379 (1 PHASE OF TRACT 13527) FOR A PREVIOUS Y APPROVED TRACT NAP CONSISTING OF 35 SINGLE FAMILY 40TS ON' 13.48 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER, ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST' CORNER OF 24TH STREET AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 225- 071 -65. A. Recitals. (i) Overlook Homes has filed an, application for the 'Design Review of Tract No. 14379 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred tows "the application.n (ii) On September 26, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites pr:ar xo the add* ion of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the { Planning Commission, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on September 26,`1:990, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That - the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the app`icable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or -care or materially injurious to properties, or improvements in the vicinity, �-y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR FOR TT 14379 - OVERLOOK HOMES September 26, 1990 Page 7. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs and•2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: 1) All pertinent conditions of Resolutions 88 -200 and 88 -200A I shall apply to this project. 2) The originally proposed window treatment for the A -1 elevation should, be Used rather thaii what was presented to the Committee.` 3) One driveway tr6,tment should be used per house, rather f than combining se��eral materials as proposed. I 4) The landscape concept along 24th Street shall consist of the following: 80 percent pines and 20 percent deciduous flowering trees as determined by the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. An accent tree of a different species may be used at intersections. Suggested accent tree shall be either Lagerstroemia iAJica or Pyrus cali,eryana. 5) Debris basin landscaping and fencing shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits for any phase. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District: 1) Project will be required to participate in an off -site fire management program to include, but not iimited to, fuel modification, development and maintenance of fire roads, and fire breaks. 2) Project will be required to provide two points of ingress /egress at all times during phasing; tracts. Ingress /egress roadways will be required to meet the Fire District's standards, Engineering Division: 1) All applicable conditions of Tentative Tract 13527, as stated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 88 -200 and 88 -200A, shall apply,. modified as follows: a. All references to "L Street shall read_ Cervantes Place; b. Ail references to "N" Street shall read Carmel Knolls Drive; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. OR FOR TT 14,379 - OVERLOOK HOMES September 26, 1990 Page 3 c. All references to " " Street shall read Altura Dr*kve . and d. Cul-de-sac "All is gahamo Court, "E" is Carmello Court, "M" is San Carlos Court, and "P" is Tejas Court. 2) Approval of the Design Review dots not imply approval of the Final Drainage Study, which must be approved by the City Engineer prior to Final Map approval. That study shall include: a. Design of the "interim" facilities within Phase 5 (Tract 13527) and along the west and north boundaries of 'Tentative .Tract 14139 to the north, which will eventually be accepted by the City; b. Identification',of off -site dedications necessary to extend an interim - -acilty east fro,a Tentative Tract 14139 (25th ;Street) to the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds; c. r!'od Control District approvals for all facilities within the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds; and d. Design of the interim facility along the north project boundary, including a temporary desiltirg basin. 3) All drainage protection facilities constructed with the first development phase shall be considered to be, interim facilities until rscepted by the City upon, recordation of Phase 5 (Tract 13527). A maintenance agreement shall be executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney ,guaranteeing private maintenance by a Homeowners` Association or other entity approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney, of the basin, the channels both on- and off -site, and any other interim drainage protection, facilities recommended in the final drainage study approved by the City Engineer. The agreement shall provide the City with a right- of- access ,to maintain the facilities if private 'maintenance is insufficient and shall allow the Mi y to assess those costs to the Homeoitners' Association or other approved entity. 4) Construct a temporary basin access road extending 'west of the 24th Street /Etiwanda Avenue intersection, within' the San Bernardino County;,Flood Control District right -of -way, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Access to the temporary road shall be gated, -Yq - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR FOR TT 14379 - OVERLOOK HOMES September 26, 1990' Page 4 5) It shall be the developer's responsibility to have 'the ctfrrent FIRM Zone D desi,.tnation removed from the project area. The developer's Engineer shall prepare all tt - necessary reports, plans, hydrologic /hydraulic cal culation °t, etc. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)- shall be obtained from FEMA prior to approval of the recorded map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, A Letter, of Map Revision (LOMB) shall be 'issued by FEMA' prior to occupancy, or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. This condition shall apply to any phase of the project affected by a Zone D designation. 6) (1rovide landscape and irrigation plans per City Standards,,: �uNect to as ;oval of the City Planner and City Engineer, for all `"ret'ered lot paseos and the debris basin. Both shall be annexed into the landscape maintenance district. Lots containing storm drains shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of blockage in the lest sump catch basin. if Landscaping within the "Areas of Concern" fo a('i _.''project , intersections involving collector or larger streets shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Normal resident al intersections shall have their, "noticeability" improved, usually by moving the 2t closest trees on each side of the intersection *iehind the sidewalk,, 8) Street tree easementy - shall be provided on all corner lots, measuring 6 feet from the back of the sidewalk, to accommodate the relocated trees. 9) Mow strips shall be provided to delineate between publicly and privately maintained latviscape areas: 10) A fee shall be paid to the City for removal of the temporary basin access road, south of Lots 11 through 20 in Tract 13527 (Phase 5), prior- tr ..:ordation of any final maps. 11) Taper the noses on the 24th Street medians to accommodate left turning traffic. 12) Construct Etiwanda Avenue full width from -24th 'Street to its convergence with the existing alignment nortt' of the project site, including street lights. Off-site parkway improvements can be deferred until development of the adjacent property. The developer may request a reimbursement 'agreement to recover the cost of f constructing off -site street Improvements from future j development as it occurs north of the project site. l .. ti PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR FOR TT 14379 - OVERLOOK HOMES September 26, 1990 I Page 5 i 13) A signed consent and waiver form to join and /or formlothe Law Enforcement Community Facilities District shall be filed with the .City Engineer prior to Final Map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 14) The private drainage facility along the east project boundary shall extend the entire length of the Community Trail. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPRUED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990, PLANNING COMM }'SsION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McKie , Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I. Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do herzby certify ;hat the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning 'Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of September 1990, by the following vote -to- wit:;; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COKUSSIOdERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; 11 '.� °'$wYOL.• °i �'�'b+. "'$ '�� .s� «�� as as Y M q 4fe Rtl 4l QpY q Y M (. � J -iR- QQ q au M` `y UP! Al d Q�L«�rgqd.�^ny yp ;a��i� q YM �ir lA lists � «;- i IlkRw ��q «�piw 'ar�iQ$$yY 6 u °.��iR}ar Irpi � ` «SaiRCRi Ciif VVVV 'wM� a { s H 111, <MA 3st. °.�� ARM i r 11 M y M it i 6. y1 yj 11 'ti p W 4 yi •Y ZS-N U3131 ��pq 01�1 410 RRy CDi .r4C.Y 4 gib Y Y ilp,R f; ag s1 �u a >r f0 Y! A All yG y. p 3YYII y �� 8 l.'`- i' x $S �yq YY1f pVp by ui ��lw Paz vz jut Y ; v= s2 eQy�y gIr -3 Ila ;111 sit 3-1-3 -2 1 ii its L! ev Zia .. Mt is its St ;i tl its-" soM f 32 -1 = it wA M LAI is 169 17. If ala,S'� i► ii t la _ 'S 22S.. r` a -4111 t, , 14.0 -CaK Sagat %U"4 r » taxi » NM Rq •4Y M � 2 i i ! s At ii r� \Y a a x W R i 04��O1 r4 • qO� C Y O qC ; � bbl � � `` Y ~O w. ` S. Y � ay � _ ' ■JG Y 'S Q S Y r N R• Y,,,, y. t r Nb2 a��� t+min �_� �M± w��'1'�.I� +oaMM'o�o� ^�•��� $� `jgta�� alums' •�IYw •� s».g SL ..''o w.ag��'�i �1° O M � i w Hw b _Q il r •Zwt$Mo`.M 4MC .t Q -31 q 1 03 S q 1 i w w• L g M ii `V 3y`y^ CNY� ^y ON y : a �1 M�L101 j.3 `O •Lw.O aLq .i �4N «'i i31ss` y^ g Np ` a ~ I QwT g! Y` ` �1• ^�y $Z i �¢1O G �S rN S As ^O MbR O 11 � L yN 2 IL ay T N Nww•YM .4-EX . 'dY• hU iw V U M� Y i•! n�11 2 >I >I ^I ;ac s�� u 21 _ Fu Mgr - �iw3 W :3'» as 35 $as gig ilky M Nya$a its` _ r VET TL its N tat = w a $ 3 k V N • N « •�Ac �^ r i SM Is _� 2 =r =suet uzi � v,�$ _ N «err: S 24 `aA O'S^ • M ^ye 1" iI . N0 «�i IN�v,V� . «• � w I ^ r y FS lilt^ �1�� 'J S y�V 4 M N •.•' i�� •2` YM ^i lIYII s .� ^ '�i ZEE a a L S a a h w Y��`}`� �Y� �Ni-'� to"o•Ceqe � ~ggql1 �• WY� A�y�� C ON yx3� MY6 �WL�i@w .Yt•.... �1 5 4i1 f lip. ,��s. ��� �» S « 0�• `�4 _ C Zit WE Y M M «yy^ wit pR Safi o �sj " • ^ Y 'qi �•�t' ii �k ag 3103 Osk :" .. P. iW` tt+h1i aff ap�a .. Fu�i3n g N hVl1 r »l Zia 31 1 r 31 d s x �: .� d aw :s�3��' S M N N A �1 12 21 s$°f -t$. u 3 1 3515 TL,! w. �• �} � W �3 � �` a � .. fit C. .. _ al yt s M ±i all .3t V_ tr­' t` O s a fi� V �` it9 N 1► 3 � r sits c i y{YMn 2MY w V`.G v! is: it ism ; 0 P c $i4« r w1 YV Nl v e e� i w LLl s w _ 6700 R. YMM � ayy 4g, � �5 !a�Y ! MIS C b w RI V a LAC. s LF s F �� 3 � .. J� qY� G1ii �% P ~V ��. �j3 fiw� as! Y O�pW a�} 0 • p 1M[h 7^ q o� $ S $ .y V�S MNag�C�..-TL 0� 3.0 W�i �D VYO 01N 1 1a Y ji �0o O O � N O.O••,ee i� �� �� �'tw O 4 51 sa =� M - � v a w lYH W OW V s" it wf n n UO sNf~ O x0__ ^per 4�wee + Y 9 r O y Nyy C VfMp m! �O�Q NC O � bba O Y m °aiggC� ai �. $p Ili 3 MIR g� is = ON � � � _ ills 134 era �P g u- m RD 4. A 4 � N 0: e1 Y , Ze-B is MHz C 7 �•6J YM 5s�f a u66 �5 ;qq_II g g ?S w�Z ,ts S g�•r bA N'�Y V-3 CN N L, C C 3 V ass L AMe $;ne,'ip anQrf e it, Y. ;+ Ve 6 ®N c C LY O Q O q �.o s L i 32 Y gab Y ra a vYyyY `r�s y8rlj�� g3w t um a :as 1 Eli ia L �g I.qy `q ap S J C .s w 2 &-1 3 �Wiy �® 8 C �` �� �u�vV* �y 9B p� « Y•.. ! �Ow M� .� 3 p.�r• 6 d Aft^ YNP Y11/ H uy•.(l, •Jd is �� o �$eaaC i'eyy ` °'bb°$a A� aAS «�� f7�0iSMd NO 6•bM 6iy 6r Fet OOA 4d i eiW Qtr p � NU tIa 1 •I C;� N� �I � s lb x S pk will a c aat = Y� tl Y N 02 r 9 M aM "�i° $� Ie -o ;. M 9 "�P •�� _ e •ss rat 33 2a! car do Nor ,I I_� P IY �D 1 � 33 p t rgg, a �?1 S Sae _ ry It Y i o +e iu LI; a Ail sb Y 4i w Y Ir w lb x S pk will a c aat = Y� tl Y N 02 r 9 M aM "�i° $� Ie -o ;. M 9 "�P •�� _ e •ss rat 33 2a! car do Nor ,I I_� P IY �D 1 t► .d: O. sW ® O O y a V as M M �� L Q Ia M ®m e 4 w° gel a sq All a ro3 g� M~ 4 oi? ZVI . ro� Qd+a ;'s V �9 YY 4q i! �VVY eeY iC� 'nft AsE dsw all VMS S" S 2`+ tit 3 B M ap O azz g G ` L pq y .4 y 4 SEES -a i S y'Vi AD p ¢$r S ! � � P Y � E 2 9 ® L V bis Ia Y 4 gA ~Sj sq All a Y d Ar . Sju Zw ♦ 4Y iY aC '� 'nft AsE dsw all i crry oF iRANcHo cucArvi6NGA STAFF REPORT AvIL i DATE: September 26, 1990 I TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACTS 14380 143811..14382 3 P ES RA OF TRACT 13527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRI The design review of building elevations and detailed site ` plan for a previously approved tentative tract map consisting of IG2 single family lots on 51.6 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) located north of 24th Street and west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 225- 071 -65. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested- Approval of builaigg elevations, plot plan, and grading plan. B. Project Density: Tract 14380 - 2.84 dwelling units per acre. Tract 14381 2.91 dwelling units per acre. Tract 14382 - 3.23 dwelling units per acre.. C. Surroundinci Land Use and Xonin North Vacant pproved Tentative Tract 14139); Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per aerP). South Tract 12659 (Phase 1i southeast corner under construction) and vacant; Very Low Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre). _ East - Tract 14379 (1 phase of Tentative Tract 13527), vacant; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). Pest Vacant; !Utility Corridor. 0. General Pian Desianations: Project Site - -Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) - Nort! Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential (less than Z dwelling units pe- acre) T East Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Nest Open space I= E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REP` OR 13527 - WATT INLAND EMP1I,. SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The site is currently vacant with an average slope of approximately 6.7 ,percent from northwest to southeast. 'the three phases of Tract 13527 are bordered on the west by the Southern California Edison Corridor, on the north by approved Tentative Tract 141:39, on the south by 24th Street and approved Tentative Tract 12659,, and on the east by Etiwanda Avenue. This Design Review application consists of three phases of Tentative Tract 13527 (see 'Exhibit "A" and "G "), which was originally approved by the Planning Commission an September 28, 1988. Tract 13527 is comprised of five phases, Design Review for Tract 14379 is the first phase which is also being considered by the Planning Commission tonight. Design l:eview for Tract 13527 is the final phase and is located at the western portion of the site. This phase is not up for con:tideration at this time, but will be submitted at a later date in conjunction with a map modification for the final phase. The map modification will be nece!:sary in order to allow for a larger than anticipated deb,.-.s basin. The revised size of the debris basin necessitates the elimination of approximately ten `.ots in the last phase. A Development Agreement (88 -01) was approved for the 'project on August 3, 1988 by the City Council. The Development Agreement simply stated that the Low Residential'staadards would be followed. Additionally, the site is located in Planning Unit Area 2B of the proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan which contains specific development, landscape and design standards. (See Exhibit "B ".) - Six floor plans have been provided, each .with four elevations. Four of the plans are two - story and two have turn -in garages. Plans range in size from 2,632 to 3,667 square feet. The applicant has chosen to provide 115 San Juan style homes and 37 Santa Barbara Revival style homes which is consistent with the proposed architectural guidelines of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan.` B. Trails Advisory Committee: When the overall Tract 13527 was approved in 1988, a condition was added at Planning Commission which required the provision of a paseo {greenbelt system of trails. A proposed paseo system was reviewed by the Trails Advisory Committee on March 15, 1989. At that time, the concept was not approved and the Committee requested a more integrated network of � n� IE �g PLANNING COMMISSIOW STAFF REPORT DR 13527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 3 paseos as well as an enhanc_d parkway concept. The concept was revised, reviewed and recommended for approval by the Committee on August 16n f989. (See Exhibit I'D".) Design Review C0q.N1.4ieez The Design Review Committee (McHie? Melcher, Coleman reviewed the project on June 21, 1950, and did not recommend approval. The Committee directed the applicant to revise their plans itt order to address the following issues: Architecture 1. The applicant should attempt to provide a 12 -inch overhang beyond the built -up facia on the San Juan elevations. ;a 2. The applicant should look at tie possibility of hinging the roof line on the San Juan elevation types. 3. Tha applicant should explore the possibility of providing a °veranda style" porch on certain plans where it could be stretched parallel to the street, 4. Additioial detailing should be provided for those side and rear elevations facing Etiwanda Avanue and 24th Street. Architectural elements such as shutters and /or wrought iron elements should be provided to upgrade the sides and rears close to the level of detailing on the front of the house. Landscape:. 1. The paseo should be widened between Loto 191 and 192 if there is sufficient roan to do so. 2. Tha applicant should 'try to increase the front yard setbac,i on those houses along the enhanced parkway where lots are deep enough in order to create the feeling of greater open space. S. Tree spacing should be reduced to 20 feet on center on the double rots of paseo gees. 4. The second row of trees behind the sidewalk should be the same species throughout the paseo system in order to provide continuity. The front row of trees may vary and should match the street tree on the opposite side of the str6et. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 13527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 4 5. A tree easement which would allow the trees to be trimmed by the City and which, would prohibit removal of-che trees I should be provided.., J 6. A larger sidewalk (5 feet in width) should, be provided along the enhanced parkway trails. 7. Front ,yard landscaping should be provided. The applicant should work with staff to determine the appropriat=+ level of detail. 8. The Engineering Division will work with the applicant to determine an appropriate plant palette for 24th Street which will be user.; consistently along its length in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan area. 9. The applicant should submit photographs of the proposed textured paving for driveway /entry walk treatments. Walls 1. Wrought iron fencing with pilasters should be provided along the north side of the debris basin and at the end op of Las Brisas Court. 2. Block fencing with pilasters at every other property line shoul,l be provided along the northwest perimeter of the site adjacent to the debris basin, if acceptable to the Engineering Division. 3. The front word return wails on Lot 27 (Tract 14382) and Lots 67 ano 58 (Tract 14380) should be relocated. The applicant revised their plans and addressed the majority- of the issues The Committee (McNiel, Melcher, Coleman) reviewed the project again on August 2, 1990, and recommended 1 approval with the following items to return to the Comm t} e as a Consent Calendar item: 1. Pop -cuts over window in the roof line or. right side elevations should be provided. A diagram wes worked out j at the _meeting. 2. Driveway treatments should be more clearly identified end new photographs presented to the Commission, 3. The landscape concept for 24th Street and the paseo system Should be reviewed and approved. I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 13527 - WATT INLA14D EMr1RE SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 5 4. The window treatment on the front elevations (i.e., horizontal panes, multi - panes, etc.) Fhould be carried through on all sides of.the house. 5. The full Commission should determine whether or not front yard landscaping should be provided per the requirements of the proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Plans were revised by the applicant and reviewed by the Committee (Melcher, Weinberger, Coleman) on August 16, 1990 as a Consent Calendar item. The project was approved with the following conditions; 1. Driveway treatnent No. 3 (heavy broom finish) should be used in the driveways of front entry garages only and on not m.re than 25 percent of these. The other treatments should be used equally throughout the project. 2. Window treatment on the front elevations (i.e., horizontal panes, multi- panes, etc.) should be carried through on 01 sides of the house. 3. The revised pop -out over the window on the right side elevation was ,approved, however, the glass block should be replaced with the metal grate detail. Although the Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project, one outstanding issue remains which should be discussed by the full Commission. The proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan require;, front yard landscaping which consists of trees and hydroseeded lawn. (See Exhibit "C" for exact number of trees per lot.) be should be noted that Design Review 14379 (the first plaase of Tract 13527) will be provi0 ng front yard landscaping per the requirements of the proposed Etieanda Specific Plan In addition, Tract 13565 which is within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan area has also agreed to provide front yard landscaping, in a manner more extensive than what is proposed by the plan. The Etiwanda Specific Plan, which regulates development south of 24th Street, also requires front yard landscaping. The applicant feels that homeowners should have the freedom to custom landscape their front yards. The applicant will ,r provide a larger (24" box) tree for the enhanced parkway paseo concept. In addition, they intend to provide turf and irrigation between the curb and the sidewalk. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 13527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 6 Staff recommends that the proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan concept be followed. Also, by requiring developer installation, the Xeriscape Ordinance can be enforced. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the proposal on June 19 1990, and approved it on July 31, 1990, subject to the additional conditions listed in the attached Resolution of Approval. E. Grading Coma %tee: The overall tract was appraved with a condition which stated the following: A comprehensive grading plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Grading' Committee prior to recordation of the final map. The plans shall address the following areas: a. The maximum rear yard splits shall not exceed eight feet when unretained or twelve feet with the use of a four foot retaining wall. b. The maximum side yard splits shall not exceed four feet. c. Split level pads, stem walls, and varying floor levels shalt be incorporated to reduce grading. d. The maximum pad to ground differential of external boundaries shall not exceed eight feet. e. All cross -lot draina; shall be within private easements and improved L,dices. The Grading Committee reviewed the Design Review application for compliance with the above condition on June 18, and July 30 and approve-4 it on July 30, 1990. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Design Review for Tracts °14380, 14381 and 14382 (three phases of Tract 13527) through adoptdon of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. �� b PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 13527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page T pe y submi ;Re rad Bu r ity Planner BB :BN :ml g Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Tract 13527 Exhibit "B" - Planning Area 2B of Etiwanda North Specific Plan Exhibit "C" - Etiwanda North Specific Plan Laedscago Standards Exhibit "D" - Enhanced Parkway Location Exhibit "E" - Enhanced Parkway Co., ;ept Exhibit "P" -_Site Utilization Map Exhibit "G" - Site Plan Exhibit "H" - Grading Plan Exhibit "I" - 8uilding'Elevat ons qW Resol u'ti on '88 -200 Resolution of Approval with Conditions 'a lz �J —�] L �YI�wYO+ •OwiM COY10Y f1Yn uut+�+w/sugw o.+we r _mot PLANNING UNIT AREA KEY MAP v/ f a' I I I 1 I I t I, I ii t t, PLAIN. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND ENTRY WALK WITH A MEDIUM SCORE DEEP JOINTS AS INDICATE . PLAIN CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND ENTRY WALK WITH A COARSE BROOM FINISH AND STEEL TROWELED EDGES AS INDICATED. r I .I 3' MINIMUM 1 t REDWOOD HEADER BOARD(TYP,) T 1 I 1 1 ACCENT TREE PER LOT. (SEE OTE)5 GAL ` TYPICAL MAILBOX STAND +e a AVERAGE TREET. (SUBJECT TO POST 16' -0" MAX. ON LOTS LESS THAN OFFICE APPROVAL) 60' WIDE. 24' -0' MAX.FOR 3 CAR GARAGES ON LOTS GREATER THAN E0' WIDE AT SIDEWALK OR CURB NOTE: ABOVE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE INSTALLED BY BUILDER OR BY HOMEOWNER USING PUILOER ALLOWANCE. IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING MAY OCCUR AFTER OCCUPANCY OF HOME. IN THIS MANNER, WATER METERS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR CONNECTION IN OWNERS NAM' UP TO 50' WIDE LOT i TREE PER LOT EXHIBIT 30 UP TO 65' WIDE LOT 2 TREES PER LOT' TYPICAL FRONT YARD UP TO 80' WIDE LOT 3 TREES PER LOT LANGSr- APINGiDRIVEWAY OVER 80' WIDE LOT 4 TREES PER LOT TREATMENTS CITY f%-'W'V rm-vl= xv, 1062f? RANCID CLX.AM NGA Trrm, gNsp 4-ANDI 24. KANNNG MOON EXHIBI"I'M `.,._.St:ALE,. � -,16 E E E lu CITY OF PLANNING DMSM s x 1� • Mt% DQ ExHimT. 2 scALE. t 11 I l'n V L � c� `„s... E - w'''VIN 6MIJ V, roPAN MIN, I] x . r� 4-f � � L �';,;•rf �� �����, yfi �� �/' rN� �%i o�1�Q 4 �•rs ti • s- ■ x' s E a gg �. ` �Merle t�i'� � to KAN N, tA �JTY CF RA CLX-'A�X.N�' nANNM DfVW4 EXHUX.1% SCALE. 6 K-.11, r w_- 4- n .y CF CSI` C -.z) 7 IA A 2t l $ \ � \ � � CrrY CF RANUID CLUANVICA IFAMiNG rAVw-KN ƒ\ / � §\ � � � §� ` ^ � . � � %i� ¢�� §� y�� . »\ I , �. � � � / � � \�J \ \- \� \� /\ rrEM, DP- 15 Tnu: a(o-vA-n!2MS ExpumT. ZL2— sr-A1: \.» \« ic {SAT I F �J 0 �L I 7C �r F� a E s€ � r OR a° �pp I N �r F� a E 1� rra A CA � o or :K 3. Z S N }S *F S 4 IVII �o u a F 0 M � n D. 6 V V ft CITY Rte I'I..MMING DiVISM a 5 51 H ' EXHIBIT- SCALE. s� 5 �f _i � as }4 FSi t' i -t�. E !� t � Uuu L�r7 W S � I I �j �G� ■ a 4 Uv 's A n t 1 gp 1 3 -3� i I 1P ig, W- GJ 0 M! It Al C= OF ITEM- 12Z RANCHO CUCANKXNCA- TrIU-. PLANNING DIVKaq EXHIBIT- SCAL.E- C7 JA All ii:. :�,i a RR V, ,;;r IN CA 0 O MIT CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVEM EXHIEtT. Sr-Aa., ll -132 I] �72 I] Q � 1 D D Qn i� a q� DD a.n Cj-i ' OF l��t��Q���v*�� � "'� M' C ie O w' ' SIP �� 11 tt :r q� C SALE, sm 1 0701-02 09 26-90GPC Agenda 3 Qf 6 0 0 a O � L7 D P s 9 p�i_t • a SEMI& i m z I 11 aa k � d Em Im -1 1 TI c � m �r a s C7 v a�� z 2 .i 3. IF ,J 0 v z L J it � +,mod' r• �� MY CF PLANNING DIVEM EXHUT., , . -SCALE- 2117---- lu L e � L r Fit 0 e a � �� It 3� 4� f,98 r rdr, raw, fle rz� E,x.ilET- 1-:16 SCALE- / TO . .§ 2 \. c % \■ k , � � ■, �f m ?� j .� ■ �f # R, �. ��. $ k , k� � � $ ƒ �\ § {. |] k § � 2 w- I A 9� ��. �E<k :� . ,i\ ».2 ± ■,a 0 z m r m D O 0 i �L /► IP �Oq 1 O z m r D O z lo 8 lown y ri, -qtv O rz V I PV A a 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA KAMING DIVISM jph EXHIBIM -Xn!9!20— SCALE-_ RESOLUTION NO. 88 -200 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAFMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13527, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 252 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 88' ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL. DESIGNATION (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET - APN: 225 - 071 -65. A. Recitals. (t) Terry Melcher has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13527 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subj.-ct Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 28th of September, 1%3, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFO4E, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Co=ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comaission hereby specificali, 'lids that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission d;iring the above - referenced public hearing on September 28, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the r rthwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street with a length of 3,640 feet and a depth of 1,328 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north, south and east it designated for residential use and is currently vacant. The property to the west is designated for open space uses and is presently vacant; and d� (c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standa7:ds of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and (d), The development of 252 or fewer single family units on 88 acres of land is consistent with the Low Residential land use desigrtatin:: df the General Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 8L -200 TT 13527 - Melcher September 28, 1988 Page 2 11 (e) The proposal, with the Community Trail along the east tract boundary, is in compliance with the Masser Plan of Trails and the objectives of the Equestrian Overlay District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and ,oncludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General ?tar, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improve;aents of the tentative tract is consistent with the ;Seneral Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdi «ision is not likely to cause substantial envreonmental daiwage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and Is (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of records for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Comaiw on hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Comnsission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hareby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorooratod herein by this reference. A. Tentative Tract r 1. The existing overhead utilities (electrical) on the opposite side of unimproved 24th Street shall be und+r .rv►und foam the first pole on the east side of EO anda Av;nue to the first pole off -site west of the pro;(ect's west boundary prior to public improvement 1�J a• PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 8P -LUO TT 13527 - Melcher September 28, 1988 Page 3 acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. `The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half of the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 2. The existing overhead utilities (electrical and telecommunications) on the west side of the dirt road within the Cucamonga County stater District easement shalt be underground from the first pole on the south side of 24th Street to the first pole off -site north of the north project boundary prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. 3. Twenty - fourth Street shall be constructed full width iexcept for parkway improverAents along the south roadbed) from its intersection with Etiwanda Avenue (existing) to its intersection with "L" Street (proposed). The developer may request a reimsbursearent agreemtent to recover the cost of constructing the south roaibed and one -half the cost of constructing the median islands from future development as it occurs, on the apposite side of the street. 4. A permit from the Metropolitan dater District is required for work within its right-of-way. S. If the 24th Street construction and undergrounding of utilities are done by others, this developer shall honor any reimbursement agreements in favor of those performing the work. 6. An in -lieu fee for the future construction of 24th Street west of "V Street shall be paid to the City prior to approval mf any Final Map that includes any lots west of "L Street/ The fee shall be one -half the estimated cost of constructing 24th Street, including the median, from "E" Street to the west project boundary. 9. ftiwanda Arenue,, between 24th Street and Highland Avenue, shall be upgraded, including surfacing and an adequate structural section 32 feet wide, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. If the developer is unable to obtain the necessary off -site dedicatie}r to construct Etivanda Avenue north of the north property line to its convergence with the existing alignments a temporary transition on -site will be allowed as follows a) The design of the transition shall be to the satisfaction of the.City Engineer. Z -'� PLANNING C"ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88 -200 TT 13527 - Melcher+ Septeeber 28, 1988 Page 4 b) A temporary road easewnt shall be provided on lot 11, c) A fee for the future removal of the temporary transition and its replacement with ultimate street Improvements shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the Final Flap. 9. If off -site dedication is obtained from the property owner to the north prior to approval cf the Final Map, then this G :veloper shalt construct the ultimate Etiwanda Avenue north of the_,aro�iect site to its convergenice rarity, the existing alignment. it shall be constructed full width, excludirg parkway improvements. The developer any request a reimbursement agreeKert to recover Vita cost of constructing off -site street improvements from future development as it occurs north of this site. 10. Construct the City Master Plan Storm brain in 24th Street from the project site to the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to that portion of the construction costs incurred in constructing permanent drainage facilities specified on the CMGuy's Master Plan of storm drains and the developer shall eligible for reimbursement of allowable costs in excess of the fees is acccrdarrce with City policy. Any additional costs for aver - sizing facilities for interim flood protection shall be borne by the developer, 11. Plans for the 24th Street Plaster Plan Storm Drain shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Fiord Control District prior to approval of the Final Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 12. The storm drain system within the project shall be designed, to accommodate flog from the property to the north upon its future development in accordance with designated tributary areas for the 24th Street Master Plan storm drain. 13. permanent flood protection facility shall be constructed along the west property boundary as follows; a) a concrete channel shall be constructed, as justified by the final drainage study approved by the City Engineer, with sufficient capacity to allow extension of t.`ro channel along the nortImst proorty "line of the property to the north. 'it shall be fenced per City Standards. 0 b) A 12 -foot aide paved acctss road shall be provided an PLANNING C06MISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88 -200 TT 13527 - Melcher September Zit, 1988 Page 5 the east side of the channel for its entire length with access provided at both ends to a public Street. c? A permanent storm drainage easement shall encompass the channel, debris basin, service roads and fences. d) The developer shall form or annex < to a maintenance assessment district for this facility. 14. If Southern California Edison agrees to tha placement of all or part of the permanent flood pr3trtion facility within their easement, a permit from Southern California Edison will be required for work within their right -of -=. - 15, Interim drainage protection facilities shall be provide along the north project. boundary. The design shall be justified by the final drainage study and approved by the City Fogineer. A Aaintenance agreement shall be executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City At`orney guaranteeing ,rivate maintenance of tNe drair_ige pr.iectian ?'- .vity by a Homeowners Association, but providing the City with the right -of- access to maintain the facility if private maintenance is insufficient and allowing the City to access these costs to the Homeowners Association. 15. The project shall contribute to the future construction of the Etiraanda /San Sevine re9iorai drainage /flood control facilities by fomingg or anne.;;-g to a benefit assessment or a cawreity facilities district or by the pavwent of regional drainage feet; as established by the City Council. Forvation or annexation or fee payment shall to prior to Final Map vpproval. 17. Construct a 20 foot wine Community Equestrian Trail along the east project boundary; 18. Landscape maintenance easements shall ae dedicated to the Pity for the are? between the perimeter wall and the right- of-M on 24th Street, Etiwanda Avenue, and "L" Street between 24th and "NO Stre As. 19. Slopes ,within landscape easements to be maintained by the City shall not exceed 3;1, unless approved by the City Engineer. 20. Where streets are drained to storm drainage pipes (wrap co0ition) in easements crossing private property, the easement shall be graded to accept and convey overflows from the street in the event of blockage in the pipe or catch basin. }• PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88 -200 TT 13527 - Melcher September 28, 1988 Page 6 21. Off -sits ;improvements shall be provided for each phase•,of the development, as required by the City Engineer, to provide drainage protection and two means of access for each phase. 22. The earthquake fault location and buildflnn setback shall be shown on the find map. In addition, a deed restriction shall be attached to lots 24 thiu 23 identifying the location of the fault, fault setbacks, and building limitations as approved by the City Planner. 23. The developer shall . commence, participate in and coazl_kpmate, or causi, to be corenced, participated in or consummated, a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District for Foothill Fire Protection Distritt to finance a fire tation to serve the enueluprment, "ncluding land facilities, equipment gnd operations 'and maintenance. The station shall be located, designed,and built to all specifications of the Foothill Fite Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by District in accordance with its needs. In any building of the station, developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The Comauanity Facilities Distrft3 shall be forwd by District and developer, by the time of recordation. of the f�nai ,gip. 24. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the potential Fourth StreGrt Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a deposit on any property. 25. The developer shall provide design, for the ends of the cul -do -sacs to miW.mize the amount of concrete and maximize the amount of landscaping. 26. Approval of Tentative Tract 13527 is granted contingent upon Planning Commission approval of a total Design Review package, prior to recordation of the final map, which may include the following revisions: a. Deletion of one lot'each at the ends of these cul-de- sac streets. Street °M', Street `*% and Street IV. b. Provision for a pasea /greenbelt system of trails. G. Design Review 1. Prior to recordation of the final neap, a smiplete Design Review package shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Comirzion. a PLANNING CGW41SSInN RESOLUTION NO. 88 -200 TT 13527 Velcher September 28, 1988 Page 7 2, A comprehensive grading plan shall be submitted for reyiew and approval by the Grading Committee prior to recordation of the final map. The plans shall address the following areas: a) The maximum rear yard splits shall not exceed eight (S) feet when unretained or 12 feet with the use of a four (4) foot retaining wall. b) Tr° maximum side yarn splits shall not exceed four (4) feet. e) Splint level pads, stems walls, and varying floor levels shall be incorpoeated to reduce grading. d) The maximum pad tc ground differential of external boundaries shall not exceed eight (8) feet. e) All cross -lot drainage shall be within private easements and improved device.;. 3. The cul -de -sac for Street °A" adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue shall bE designed for emergency access to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire District. 4. Lots which front onto 'La Street between "N° and "J" Streets shall have circular (preferred) or nam erheaa driveways. All drive approaches on lot 109 shall be north of a projection of toe north right-of-way line for "N" Street. 5. Front yard landscaping and irrigation shall be provided on all cut -de sacs. The final plans shall be reviewed by the Design Review Ccvemitfee prior to the issuance of building permits. - 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPRCVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PL4QNING C SSIOH OF THE CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMONGA A � BY: r nal rr�an ATTEST: PLANNING COMMISSIM RESOLUTION NO. 88 -40t, iT 13527 - Melcher September 28, 1988 Page 8 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of tlse Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of September, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit., AYES: COMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CNITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: EMERICK I i I T i 2r LO " -W, b v:uf m+•a�: tipp � C *� Gp � Y 2 -, , C4. =psi yLb�y`. 4 p, r +p a n YV 'Y0. ,y L YpS @Ya s�L}i7 • 4 9N % . WAlle M6 Y 41Q•O';wQ?r qe aC -'yy+b all 9 @Y `.yL f iY N« M W fJ 6 Y C q tl!� i! �� q 7 O q 4 4 !+ M B°'.V yp OiY IN M sy9�� SG Ca CW�� �wgyawei SWV 4� S. Z laws Big 38 ar e9 e�4F�p GGG Ay NYpi fip -ii O... 7t•� A ^q « M y • _:,ffir, �. ^e a vim �6Nan O� iS q s per. yyyR ay43 g�dL~ s •M O��yM g61.�w0• µOm *a ' 'N Q^O� � uY QSH4�C 4ti1 "sY K Y <Ma0 •vv~ \~" ®aa yN �QQ+VPp.Hp,f� ��O ROI �Q Wi. Yti V '0.4 �Vtl �wY 04 Will '2J g � 1 $ sg�� M is V- 0 Ma IF � Ra�ew. Ui � ��a &m .. " AMNL Yp Q$M + via S. 4 e 7gir. All �M�Y 'O `` •� y� q }Q a 0. IF IV A' as ICJ i °x °p Giw.l��I�A� IRA; !O : r e °6F{�j�4 YGGlM p� Ol�� y�Fqq� yy��tl 4N�ylC tlyy�°9. qLC"�i0�tlN• ��SY}pp.yp MGsY Y 6C�CY `Yy �tli • w�� 9 UT a�NL. �Dtl pM yyyM tl M 6 �. d er iTL !! Y tl p a Y! iX u g r gtl g� � V� YD V. y� p p gp 4 O Y M Q y� •�0 ¢a aK yb.NE1 }1}=21 �. L o NFn u a"BdlN �t pO�pMpj{ �i vNa� V v ,Z. u- ZC.y N O Y .w°tO y.0 +j Q a`o t S: Cz E'5 V °Y V i p! 4 H Y "1s 34 : e3 w "Ts Sb g��: L y� Q Y 64 —3 M re a- �1 N `sp -N h w8 *=at $�i �� a�Y� tl ./ R N itsNN^ q$ S tl V y I Y O V aey _ !■ Y E?E CS Y! Cstl M V tl� L 4 Y L�Y B �a Y Np A� rr Y y N r W CVx VS p M $ p s° 2 `` .831 s . ! M Y p p O M ®Y Cg ®6 L' C}MnLO �mp� is Y � � ail! e I 1 n�_ F,:-" O NX« WW a C _ n..q C y. ►CMM Y�Q qp�M O p` � p 4�c �O w § Z. U, d+> Gn OY aC My` �!bppy a� A tl � � H & w`L�mgL s�sov.� 3116 s g 8 L _ 21 A Al l i .'gag N�ISH L y� Q Y 64 —3 M re a- �1 N `sp -N h w8 *=at $�i �� a�Y� tl ./ R N itsNN^ q$ S tl V y I Y O V aey _ !■ Y E?E CS Y! Cstl M V tl� L 4 Y L�Y B �a Y Np A� rr Y y N r W CVx VS p M $ p s° 2 `` .831 s . ! M Y p p O M ®Y Cg ®6 L' C}MnLO �mp� is Y � � ail! e I 1 n�_ F,:-" O 'qN 1 a (- pp C c Ctl ' p qr t9 O 4 0O C G+ uG cY Y` Oy Y w L L y TIM I 4222 01 tl`V <� i1�~WO ~V Vi�.� C L 'j tE L Y 1 4 E} y C Y L a yg p L 4 MN N m y iY.N pVMC~ , 4- -I.$ S Ji S g 4 `°p $o �.8 - 6a':"�> � b $ +�... Eva �y �• � �s �� �i.. �q+y�y5�;4pi•Vs 'a-a.S a On 2y' -�R $a -a Vg g $jffiw Aw°w 4.0y C. � VG 14 Y> x Gb p N. M.. 6� N NL i °VLY �a. GGLGGL9 NYyY1 CNLwrr wC !! v L`;' R Ulm ai.iy CY an. war OL atv ISIS p O p p p E M� � «y rww��4 1 ^w m v w� ( • mm e &ar• �: q $iii cVQ$ ilpp.r -1S C p�¢0.°1Q6. ^qp V`Y Yg �, � ^° X� p =-u 11li xi 4�U'S a �1ft 9 `g w.N i��Y Mg p� wr �w = � is~O Y o rw{w °�. a g +.. iii yN N .3 . Eli +a 6' �a yuy%=e,« r 00 = ;ow°.4 Sto e i ariSt.°o�°. y n O Z W d ^� JL -9a CS Y�Mj .. �� �cra« 4nwij � � �r� p� p� 6 +Y �O.Y a OLL 4 °ppi Y y .lGl .pOy. :22 C9 L Cy C� �� f M^ 3! O^ .00 y L -Si 5 :ia O N 1 DV 0Y !fir - :Yy � $G a +O q ^ O� + O• �M �^ag,T(r $ ` sa`Y- Y�1 54s gw$Q= y is" ow V M 3 R e IC`` � a �1 N Y"O 21 C �NY Y^�-L NOY C Y�Y � �C M OY_� y�;�� N •� yyqs N V°' u W OOCLQY u=3% �pp6�Y33 Oip N�O p�p� �9.9 �V�4� PpsrA_ B.aY ��N11 {� y�� C 9Y �YYq Y s^� 4�+ � YY 7x{YN eO� 1�0M6 40p x1�QQ Yp� 6U '= L }^ N �r�`• 6i M.4. VVVIII ` AY. Cf. N M, `V� d s lino C s 1 4� L if L 8 °�9 =R] 0V Lµw pyM y er •a 1�Os O 1� o �y tic y N b M w o u MiS a 0 Q� Dv 1 ^N .6 S9�Y ° e�: y+$ i yD G O� Y CO Na. r erw} jai P y- 1 q` s r N ` Big? 2 a � « p e s Oi Awl `Y El � Ns 1 q ■�� LOW $'$ yLYu a �ioY.y Nit �p aO bii i +� �9aQ si ®y1�1 � Ye h. Q y M Yi M s%* C C :tag aa N A �i ^I $sr MY ^� s s. 24 py6 f N ` sa ssN Z I 24 as 0 � � q C B N � ` i Ce 5 4� L C Y L+rTL 0V Lµw pyM y er •a V^�� tic S9�Y r tl Y O ^YY` b. MK CO Na. +^ _.N 11^7- Y� T, C Y. �x Y Pa• �al �� `Y El q ■�� LOW ti au �M eo9r s ��^Yr ®o ii tl o w �6"wyd qm 8`,,08 TL .g � tliyc �: a =i A V 221 M Lag o � Y I c� 6P r M C:! gY Y L TO �tl V 2 S f W7 r e� M ��99ss \« C 13 3 Y E py�y LL�O yyy ^VV� spy +y. 21 e� �S �« r �Y� 4 ryg3r� N+`q =r �e3wg i���Gtl �® VYONi 0 �y CYaW$yy ai 1 ` a !' � O 7 jilt gL y p S p A ! 2 TCyr as C N tl� P 0 Y 4 4 Y Q MS U ® Oar O.~ M g ay s na s� 14 � ' L�tl 1. 01 S' TL o i_ olli ° i Sg t GPs« Ails ' file mgy p i W O C Y W Y 3 b 4-2 P E- to Y V J ° g� u t L° O Si6 = ; =� N a os r � u r _ r� qqQ > . oy LEe � Cc xaCC _ S O. y O. BEY �p r•N so. t *'f Y a e Y 9 L~ N Y K 9`� V ^E C OI ttC ^ G N �L 3 y C e P `ep > O OC $ e LV L. K Y °.5 O.r!e$ L 12 .OI ! Y Q M Cr q t aYC VVYG OL± a: NY$ $�°C $ vN- yLl j[^L � rz Y. ci 9VNV fY.i_ .- MN C:E`. E �V C 1 (Li �� X. O A6 Yt O ` E O0 O ^W+ ^llf L w^ `m �YOr Lp� `�N �ywCA �rML MC YL -M �wpVyL, Yq ^$ iYV My6 4E iM »cu ^^ OG +W ��. +s �Ya3MA :!r �oCq �Mi�yggeL �.` ✓`N OJN4xx. T* 6Y �. �. y_{�y{E�.yYM� rLf� =� y� xr�`q $ Lp Pcp �NVW 1.MMeo Vl 4".•'O WM i Y� 1iN Q+ FV eCi 6.M ft � I � I $ Y m Y W Y 3 L S �ppM C g� � pp Si6 > _ r� Y V t N N *'f Y a e L~ � Y K 9`� V ^E C N � Y � �� � o � Q :si•� cp tl`? V ��+ !L Y J. 5u Nr « «o• Z= $��.�y YY 4 c s ~EO MV a.S Q yr O N g � °�Y ��q y�ri yy>§ ■° E �9 � � Hit O Ha oil w° Q M S 4 L N C 3SA y. O N v 11 1,1 s. Mo H V3 Y C M Q O r � N� Y Vim` go «� .3 Lug Y C b OTj xq+ 3$6 YY q y� O u i b ri 9 A lB9S '�YYL H 3 t n{yi y! 4i0� `O Y C M pp YY^ r � O q D V g a •s' 2-01 i u�M All i=i a :Q Y ` �a �r a� _ W itM. K 4 s O i �. AE ys ±^t. - 01� M` Y 9 A lB9S r H 3 t n{yi y! i1.�O `O C M �ppqq>v YY^ r � s � M 3b Q L g a i 9 u�M All apeNN :Q Y ` �a �r a� l N Y d ±^t. i M 1f1 1 R 1 H n{yi y! i1.�O `O C M �ppqq>v YY^ V at ka s � M 3b Q L u�M apeNN :Q Y ` �a �r a� l �y. d ±^t. 01� M` Y IN qtr a 4L.1 2 I� BM M 1f1 1 R 1 REESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACTS NO. 14700, 14381, AND 14382, (3 PHASES OF TRACT 13527), A PR�.IOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, CONSISTING OF 152 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 51.6 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED NORTH OF 24TH STREET AND WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREC7 - APN: 225- 071 -65, A. Recitals. (i) Watt Inland Empire has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 14380, 14381, and 14382 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On September 26, 1940, the Planning Co,=ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application., (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the absve- referenced meeting on September 26, 1990, including written and oral stiff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as 'follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) Thixt the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is loca',d; end (c) That the proposed design is ir. compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 13527 ZkTT INLAND EMPIRE SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 2 (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions 1 applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, :safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements i.n the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and ever; condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, . attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: 1. All pertinent conditions of Resolutions No. 88 -200 and 88 -200A shall apply to this project. 2. Driveway treatment #3 (heavy broom finish) shall be used an the driveways of front entry garages only and on no more than 25 percent of these. The other treatments shall be used equally throughout the project. 3. Window trewoent on the front elevations (i.e., horizontal panes, multi - pages, etc.) shall be carried throughout on all sides of the house. A. The revised pop -out over the window on the right side e? zvation , is approved; however, the glass block shall be replaced with the metal grate detail. 5. The second row of trees behind the sidewalk on those streets with the enhanced parkway concept shall be the same species throughout the paseo system in order to provide continuity. The front row of trees may vary and shall match the street tree on the apposite side of the Street. 6. A 5 foot wide sidewalk shall be provided along one WP, of the enhanced parkway trail. 7. Front yard landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of the Etiwanda North Specific plan as shown in the attached Exhibit "A." 8. The landscape concept along 24th Street -and Etiwanda Avenue shall consist of the following: 80 percent -- pines and 20 percent dediduous flowering tree as dc._�(:ed by j the 'Etiwanda North Specific Plan. An accent tree of a. different species may be used at intersections. Suggested accent trees shall be either i.agerstroamia indica or Pyrus aalIeryana. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR 13527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 Page 3 9. The Design Review for Tract 13527 (when submitted), small be provided with wrought iron fencing and pilasters along the north side of the basin and at the end of Las Brisas Court. 10. The Design Review for Tract 13527 (when submitted), shall be provided with a block wall and pilasters at every property Tine along the northwest perimeter of the site adjacent to the debris basin. 11. The sir, loot stucco wall on Lot 70 (Tract 14380) shall be relocated behind the front setback line. 12. Debris basin landscaping And fencirki, shall be reviewed add approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits for any phase. Rancho Cucamona?,Fire Protection District: 1. Mello -Roos (CFD) requirements shall apply. 2. This project shall be required to comply with the North Etiwanda Fire protection Study. 3. This project shall he required to provide two points of ingress /egress at all times during phasing of tracts. Ingress /egress roadways shall be required to meet the Fire District's standards. Engineering Division 1. All applicable conditions of Tentative Tract 13527, as stated in Planning Commission Resolutions No, 88 -200 and 88 -200A, shall apply, toodified as follows: a. All references to "L" Street shall read Cervantes Place; and b. All references to "N" Street shall read Carmel Knolls Drive, and c. All references to• "3" Street shall read Altu a Drive; and d. Cul- de-sac "A" is Bahama Court, "E" is Cammteilo Court, 'r "M" is San Carlos Court, and "P" is Tejas Court. f 2. Approval of the Design Review does not imply approval of the Final Drainage Study, which must be approves by the City Engineer prior to Final Map approval. That study shall include: IT-67 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION ND. DR 13527 WATT INLAND EMPIRE SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 Page 4 a. Design of the "interim" facilities, Phase 5 `(,Tract 135273 and along the west and north boundaries of Tentative Tract `4139 to the north, which will eventually be acceptea by the City; and b. Identification of off -site dedications necessary t e.,tend an interim facility east from Tentative Trac 14139 (25th Street) to the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds; and c. Flood Control District 3porovals for all facilities within the Eti-wanda Spre,4ing Grounds and d. Desgn of the interim facility along the .north project boundary, incsding a temporary desil' ,1g basi vi. 3. All drainage protection facilities constructed with the firs; devc-lopment phase shall be considered to be interim facilities until accepted by the City upon recordation of i Phase 5 (Tract 13527). A maintenance agreement shall be executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing private maintenance by a Homeowners' Association or other entity approved by the City Engineer and City Worney, of the basin, the channels both on and off -site, and any otiiar interim drainage protection facilities recommended in the final drainage study approved by the City Engineer, The agreement shall provide the City with a right of access to caintain the facilities if private maintenance is insufficient and shall allow the City to assess those costs to the Homeowners' Association or ^ *her approved � entity. i 4. Constr6ct a temporary basin access road extending west of the 24th Street /Cervantes Place intersection, within the San Bernardino County Flood Control District right -of -way, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Access to the temporary road shall be gated. S. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIR:i Zone D designation removed from the project area. The developer's Engineer shall prepare all t :zessary reports, plans, hydrologic /hydraulic calculations, etc. A Conditional Letter of trap Revision (CLONR) Shall be obtained from FEMA prior to approval of the recorded map or issuance of building. permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision i1.OMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement . acceptance, whichever occurs first. This condition shall apply to any ,:phase of the project affected by a Zone D designati on. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 13527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE - SEPTEMBER 26,'1990 Page 5 6. Provide andscape and irrigation plans per City stard.ihs, subject to approval of the City. Planner and City Engineer, for all lettered lot paseos and the debris basin. Both shall br annexeu into the landscape maintenance district. Lots containing storm drains shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of blockage in the last sump catch basin. 7. Landscaping within the "Areas of Concern" for all project intersections involving collector or largJr streets shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Normal C' residential intersections shall have their "noticeability" improved, usually by moving the 2# closest trees on each side of the intersection behind the sideN"k. 8. Street trse easements shall be provided an all corner lots, measuring six feet from the back of the sidewalk to accommodate the relocated trees. 9.- Mow strips shall be provided to delineate between publicly and privately maintained landscape areas.. 10. Street improvement plans for all streets with enhanced parkway treatments shall include the second r -," of trees, behind the sidewalk. All street trees shall be approved by the City Engineer. 11. Provide sidewalk easements plus an additional 6 foot street tree easement, measured from the back of the sidewalk, for all enhanced parkway paseo cirnnections paralleling local streets in private front and side yards. 12. Provide a 26 foot wide temporary ,paved access root connecting Altura Drive and Carmel Knolls Drive upon development of Phase 4 (Tract 14382). 13. A fee shall be paid to the City for removal of 'he temporary basin access road, south of Lots 11 through 20 in Tract 13527 (Phase 5), prior to recordation- of any final maps. - 14. Taper the noses on the 24th Str=eet medians to accommodate left turning traffic. 15. Construct Etiwanda Avenue full width from 24th Street to it's convergence with the existing aligirment north of the project site, including street lights. Off -site parkway improvements- can be deferred ur.M development of the adjacent property. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to , recover ' the cost of constructing,; off -site street improvements from future development as it occurs north of the project site. J01 PLANNING COW4ISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 13527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 6 3 -_ 16. A signed consent and waiver form to ,join and/or, form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities District shall bR filed with the City Engineer prior to Final Map approval or the issuance of building perm:'is, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 17. A lot line adjustment shall be recorded coacurreatly with i the Final Map to incorpo;oate the entire north property line slope into the downhill lots, per the 'agreement between the owners of Tentative Tracts ;13527 and 14139. 4. The Secretary to tttis Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY Of SEPTEMBER-.,1390. i PLANNING COMMISSION OF ' THE 'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Larry T. MCNieI, Chairman, ATTEST: I Brad Buller, Secretary I, Bract Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that The foregoing Resolution was duly and A ,. l n f he passed. and sdo ted b fire Planning omm ssto o t, regularly introduced, A s p y g_ w Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a reg:iiar meeting :f the Planning ..omission held on the 26th day of Sepaember, 1990, by the following vote- toewi.t: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: fABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: j; 11 (DRIVEWAY TREATMEN TS SMALL VARY VATH THE USE OF BRICK OR O,7HER MAS NARY BANDS TYPICAL MAILBOX STAND (subject to Post OEIke approval) STREET TREES 30'0.C. AVERAGE PER LINEAL FCOT OF STREET. fir1AY BE CLUS,(ERED. r � C M Engineering Associates sari B®rnerdim - Vista • Tem xi;_73 JSi N�..ain G�MOSrw.GMY (1..� Ewands kbrth Specific plan s city of ` Randw Caca"a Y. -4T O4Otl1. .111— p.� ! @r�V O ID °.ei��ii:i iv r O� $ r N � Y O� yLg O �� 4 y •� a C N� �� F 6 .."b�1 $'"�•°' M Mehl"u$lff 0 a�w»,YY ++ i Y qq qp YN Y �y d ^ Yp Y^ y�°i_��e.0 �+gbyp� III N iA "` sY -® Y.r_ air] ab ^YyyQQ OFpQ i�YY�,ss ,jr¢� �a b�► V,� ° �P_ oz }� Veim A-2-4sez �- �• Al Na 1 U1 Y Nra � YO Y I �Mii KMeN� o ai Hui 2% IE y> N{ >4 Xi >4 I c. u ffi aIgHir aiy IL . Y swruce +� s+ S -- a.b.20 : 1it�ffi. pa 171 1 Ph SS MM 8 wi a 04 2 W a v ti i t. 21 Six fill i IL ®yi 40 �ow'li.�i� Lao $y� @qp QSa V V 9� O� 4tlY yj� � O� Yry g v 1L �T'6 %Hge p l�tlUl�S VNI -g C- M J741 . 4 ' $ su 41 r d H1. � • ��r.� �a y »o �_ay�- . -i� i.�a m ^� ,d� xs Atli r ■= �: � r +m YZV_ r0 �•tl�� MtlY �� tl I Y O•��B��O ,Aa= a L3 �1� u TIM '`f n xf a sar .a al Y A� j=.1l't Or zi It, I . j i 1411 -9 Aids pY�,• Y - M c P AMA Sid =gas a fimal 3s�� 3�s fig j:rfT'rS P. .4 121 Kit ri- =ad lull- RIM m- lilt YZ -$y_ 4 e�q`.�g{ q - � '•��`` a b...Y i1y -r. I s , IM Q`} j, �`S! O• N � RrC M {, a� ®.�.'Y iqw� YYC E�qK � YSj Y 1. '� —_� oM = 0 Q ^��c kMeNC6O EeLxyr �ypyp sq pY1y�$OJJ$I� O ac L ~e�C� � �cc• � V� V ■■� �.`� LYp LYpOO IJ p � Y YN qjr. Q ° q � • 4 V Q� � V O N � K � N � co� A : M • � aY K N V M r Y= A !P:S QL pLpW ei �qLy L`My T- °yp Y. p.N V�� a i•� 1q. MM r �. � p1 N L LN yL GMY. 4.pN0 p'y ° Y �' M 6 tl S- ¢g � S _ ♦ ♦ ♦� Y " Y �y � 6M � g � � ° VVV� � tY///5111 Y 1l ss r -q g N,1q sL Cc Q Ys O+ s P Y MY gHMYq�pY° O�lP �� LAY � +_� �yygtltlNN�Ai��Ni `SgSo � g.�» » — y M a y o : Y A A�� 1 `yy MS3 `VQ�g qS — Y11O0.w C10�f Eli - $cyrr p+ - N�wVS til.� •ZM HMO Aw� aa1YS� i11a�M� XJJ xI � s 1 if y$gY 6 Ew! pawl A a w L :��s� �i g N ps HZI _ S aS1 $ r alli SUM N this 'T � WE N V� `• �M All yM IrP MM PA! f s + sp a •�� = s v - 3 0 r,� e'i�� °sr°�v� � °si'� A°!i� —su'r Qai 1:'d��w�� aE��• `"�� wSLw��iSa • �: �� � 0 =� 4 I 4 � 4 .4+ 4 � He ® y_i Lai a-1 Zh l r Y a�Q-s O i0_� sw�.Y _YS sits, G Y y^a ;Y 6� ^� OrY F yamg•' y +Z� �Y�Y� ^ �� 1p. q + O �e�o fYY� Y� » »may-y Yy 60 33 6�Y w1$ �0 J �y`�pYam p`A O! 'Ex" O N °a jI vf ( r oy yA * 77i !i ii a�si � a i �4 �Y3N s ��.r :�; �� a� - gam g s s 3 w 1--� Isis �a � sit! = 113.° Bill �a5 $� a�a �� C� r -e _. a A.. • M M L Y w w fit ills! ;.a lot Ser.— gs4M� 3 m HIM Se M Y gGh A is .1 Ar. H! ° N y� C- 7s lD r •� �Y. p ■y� � Vtl � wL� � V ` � tlq p � �P O�� �.flYxM� •CV� � 7 4 u.y�. �. ��v� CgC�t LLJ mpp im ` 's $_. Ism Pam g • ° L O C Y a1 A� Y Q • Y`NP O Y 4I . >I s;; sib is r Bse� To ii b. e MI. nil 1 11 P Jai!; jai L M {7 i B P o �e9$ 25 � g 3tl _„ —s. �c Ilia- l® 1111 =. NI �I >4 11> �4-4 1 4I �644 4I 6 `7lo 9 E M M '� � L� ��� G « 4 + yj � N a � � C O �• � 9 Y � Q 5 Q �3Ct3 �Yy SOw yy E `Y V M 3V L 4 V � Y � yy $moo 1E $sY © ;h i » '..s iu • ze wy�ga 6S s QIi, yk mM +�t�w Mg �� it Mph Y A t y�3L�Y Yi o�rH ray ``$ °w «`s� s.�i :!p ■i `qjymY Wi $` l ®i � .TLY �Z'� di°�� N0�4�11. NY •h in Lam. WY M=ly i�. Y.� �'O S �� � ARE �E. A O 3 E V S� r if is ,13 M M ■ m Vb `yy a so M yy "T y Illr • M E � P " 3f S 8 1 f � n Y tl of M A/q all is °a+_1 w Sa tar- w� i :w O N �ppmr a1 it f W i� r m SILO e w Ii z YN � • L' 45 NY t! i� r 4 s« 0� Y ees 2 M � 7 p Y- 7 c s c.� e Y a i Y rn� �gsdy rl r—. Y Y gs Y« Y C V 7; M YV �q s s � O � t aY� p Ae O t =IJ _ BHE MV•q sY �ei s3yY a —Yf st `yMn' al 1 I rt2 t O O • Qww LIP u. �1 ra3 9 r s "W 4j ail � M �pp ssu.5 ° ° 1 � 7 a ^ — ii tj i �S =� a f • e � ws g Jill 1* i s Y•• -a a: S I >1 a E— 7g E-79 ri 1 s: H i `o "W 4j ` • t A t;= s� w °v � Y ia1 e � ws g Jill s A t• f 1 E 11 IT IS OUR DESIRE TO DELIVER A MORE MATURE, LTJSH, LANDSCAPE THEME TO THE COMMUNITS. A— SINCE MOVE UP MARKET, THE BENEFIT WOULD BE COMMUNITY CONTINUITY, YET ALLLOWING EACH HOMEOWN,aR, TO PERSONALIZE THIR HOME. B— SET A PRECEDTNCE TO WHAT A PASEO SYSTEM SHOULD L00K LIRE BY INSTALLING A SUBSTP TIALLY UPGRADED :AND MATURE PASEO SYSTEM. C— WE THINK THE A7uTERNAT—'VE W LL BE A BENEFIT TO THE COMMUNITY AND TO THE CITY. LANDSCAPE AS REQUIRED: A— 15 GAL PKWY TREES AT 25 -40' CENTERS. B- NO PARKWAY LANDSCAPING C— NO PARKWAY IRRIGATION D— MINIMUM FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING. LANDSCAPING AS PROPOSED ALTERNATE: A— UPGRADED PASEO SYSTEM TO INCLUDE 24" AOX SPECIMEN TREES'. B— UPGRADE LONDON PLANE FROM 15 GAL TO 3011 BOX SPECIMENS AT KEY LOCATIONS, --ESE BEING CERVANTES AND OVERLOOK. C LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATE THE PARKWAYS. A—AUTOMATIC TIMERS TO EACH INDIVIDUAL HOME. (BETTER MAINT) B —SOD BECAUSE OBVIOUS IMMEDIATE MATURE AND HOLDS UP BETTER. D— PROVIDE EACH HOMEOWNER WITH AN AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER CAPABLE OF CONTROLLING THE ENTIRE FRONT YARD. E— FRONT YARDS OF :UL —DE —SAC LOTS WILL ALREADY BE LANDSCAPBD PER CONDITIONS. I— IN ADDITION SIDEYARDS AND ADDITIONAL SLOPES - NORMALLY EYESORE AREAS. Ih i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a STAFF REPORT BATE; September 25, 1990 3 S TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bev Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE - A request for an extension for a residential subdivision of 231 single family lots on 88.40 acres of land in the Low Residential Aistrict (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Iocated at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street - APN. 225 - X071 -65. I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 23537 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 28, 2988. Associated with the approval of the Tentative Map was a Development District Amendment (pre -zone) which was approved by the Planning Commission on dune 22, 1988. The annexation of the property into the City was approved by LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission) on September 21, 1988. II. ANALYSIS: Staff analyze6 the proposed Time Extension and compared the proposal with the development criteria outlined it- the Development Code. Based upon this review, staff determined that the project iaeets the basic standards for the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). Staff has noted that the Standard Condititon requiring trie submittal of a school "will Serve" letter prior to either the issuance of building permits or recordation of the Tentative Tract Map was not conditioned an approval of the Tract. Both the Etiwanda and Chaffey High School Districts were contacted regarding the school impaction issue. Representatives of both distri is indicated that there IT, an impaction problem and that a Conditib. of Approval should be added requiring the applicant to participate in a Comiunity Facilities District. Therefore, the map was found to be inconsistent with Urgency Ordinance No. 395 pertaining to the evaluation of adequate s0ool facilities for proposed residential developments. Typically, the following condition would be added to any Time Extension of a Tract Map where it was not a part of the original Conditions of Approval., "Prior to the recordation of the final Map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shell consent to, or participate in, the r1W4F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXT. &MODIFICATIONS - TT13527 - WATT September 26, 1990 Page 2 establishment of a Mc110 -Roos Community Facilitier ± District pertaining to the project site to prwtide in conjunction with the applicable School District for the construction and maintelance of necessary school facilities. However, if any School District has previ,,usly established such a Community Facilities District, the appiicaat shall, in the alternative, consent; to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing district prior to the recordation of the Finri Map or the issuance of building permits, whichever come. first. Further, if the affectei School District has not formed a Mello -;loos Community Facilities District within twelve months of the date of approval of the Time Extension and prior to the recordation of the Final Map or issuance of building permits #or said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void." Staff has notified the aNAicant of the above condition and has obtained written consent tht they will agree to the condition. III. CORRESPONDENCE: This :tem has baen advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper as a public hearing, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff re,,ommends that the Planning Commission approve a one -year tirr- extension for Tentative Tract 13527 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, 8' rad Bul er - City Planner BB :BN:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant dated July 5, 1990 Exhibit "B" - Letter from Applicant dated September 4, 1990 Exhibit "C" - Tract Map Exhibit "D" Resolution No. 88 -20C Resolution of Approval with Conditions r 4Q Ll AFAM �Monjultants, inc. 65 E. Cooley Drive *Colton. California SZ124 ` — (?14) ®26 -2127 JIL July 5, 1990 W.O. 429 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division P.O. SOR 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA >.729 Attn: Beverly Nissen RE: Tentative Map Extension Tentative Tract .0527 On behalf of Watt inlanc!'Empire and Overlock Homes, we are requesting that the proce:as for extending the approval on Tentative Tract 13527 be initiated. Approval for Tentative Tract 13527 will lapse on September 28, 1990. This correspondence officially requests a 12 nth extens;on of approval (n this mag. This extension will allow engineering and processing t be completed on r'is project. As you know, we are presently processing this project through design. -a technical review. improvement plane for both onsite and offsi'..e improvements will be submitted for plan checking within one week. Offaite sewer in Etiwanda A*,enue is presently ')eing constructed for this project. Please let me know is any fees are necessary far proce=ssing this request. Should you have any questions concerning this request or requa r•: additional information, please give me a call. Sincerely, Robert P. King, P.R. Project Engineer cc. Steve Babel - Watt Steve .Stewart - Overlook R?K /mcy WATT INLAND EbIPIRE. INC. 9035 HAVEN AVE. SLO. 2. STE. 102 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 , 1714! 999.5663 a FAX 17141 944.5868 w September 4, '&; City of Rangy Civic Center Drive Rancho Cvcuwr*a, Ca. RlIrMing Department Surly 1111ssen Desk ar-arly, Mease accept my apologies for taking so lcrg pouring in getting this to w1s. Watt will age to add the cmlition regviritV Tract 13527 to .participate in a Mello-Rctss Caammity Lwilities District an mtlinbd in Crdli.=ze 395, for the sck:Do1 district. It y= any further qumtiom, pleases do not hesistste to call. ♦haves If f I f -�Xfi If A WATT ENTERPRISES COMPANY y� �. I a S i4' E i i 3 t fi s � $ • 3' • :.. '' ' it 1 i' -.. • 3 •s.ag i i •; 4 s ..� � . yea � • S ,�. s ! �.�,, }� "c ' 1 �, 3., • 3 �. =1 g e ::� i � •. �Ji yin "= .n..• _ � e its � � �1• � a Itb `e RESOLUTION NO. 88 -200 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13527, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 252 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 88 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET - APN: 225 - 071 -65. A. Recitals. (i) Terry Melcher has filed an application for the approvAl of Tentative Tract Map No. 13527 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 28th of September, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal pmrequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1.. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 28,, 1986, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at- tie northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street with a length of 3,640 feee, and a depth of 1,328 feet and is pre ently vacant; and (b) The property to the north, south and east is designated for residential use and is currently vacant. The property to the vest is designated for open space uses and is presently vacant; and (c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards of the uity of Rancho Cucamonga; and (d) The development of 252 or fewer single family units on 88 acres of land. is consistent with the Low Residential land use designation of the General Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSF TT 13527 - Melcher SQptember 28, 1988 Page 2 ;ESOLUTION NO. 88_200 (e) The proposal, with the Community 'Trail along the '6ast tract boundary, is in compliance with the Master Plan of Trails and the objErtives of the Equestrian Overlay District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission heraby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design, or improvements cf the tentative tract is. consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitats and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will riot conflict with any easeme!it acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has bee, re °:sewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental. Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. A. Tentative Tract 1. The existing oyerhead utilities (electrical) on the opposite side of unimproved 24th Street , Shall be underground from- the first pole on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue to the first pole off -site west of the project's west boundary prior to public improvement Yt PLANNING COFih1ISSI IESOLUTION NO. 88 -200 Tr 13527 - Melcher September 28, 1988 Page 3 acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first.' The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half o-F the City adopted cost for.undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 2. The existing overhead utilities (electrical and telecommunications) on the west side of the dirt road within the Cucamonga County Water District easement shall be underground from the first pole on the south side of 24th Street to the first pole off -site north of the nortin project: boundary prior to public improvemrent:acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. 3. Twenty - fourth Street shall be constructed full width (except for parkway improvements along the south roadbed) from its intersection with Etiwanda Avenue (existing) to its intersection with "L" Street (proposed). The developer may request a reinbursement agreement to recover the cost of constructing the south roadbed and one -half the cost of constructing the median islands from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the'street. 4. A permit from the Metropolitan Water District is rewired for work within its right -of -way. 5. If the 24th Street construction and undergrounding of utilities are done' by others, this developer shall honor any reimbursement agreements in favor of those performing the work. 6. An in -lieu fee for the future construction of 24th Street west of "L" Street shall be paid to the City prior to. approval of any Final Map that includes any lots west of "L" Street/ The fee shall be one- half the estimated cost of constructing 24th Street, including the median, from "L" Street to the west project boundary. i 7. Etiwanda Avenue, between 24th Street and Highland Avenue, shall be upgraded, including surfacing and an adequate ,structural section 32 feet wide, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. If the developer is unable to obtaih the necessary off -site dedication to construct Etiwanda Avenue north of the north property line to its convergence with 'the existing alignment, a , "orahf transition on -site will be allowed AML as folIows, a) The design of the transition shall be to the satisfaction of the.:City Engineer. f; PLANNING COMISSIC XSOLUTION NO. 88 -200 TT 13527 - Melcher September 28, 1988 Page 4 b) A temporary road easement shall be provided on lot 11 1 A fee for the future removal of the temporary transition and its replacement vita ultimate street improvements shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the Final ftp. 9. If off -site dedication is obtained ;ram the property owner to the north prior to approval of the Final Map, then this developer shall construct the ultimate Etiwanda Avenue north of the project site to its convergence with the existing alignment. It shall be constructed full widt., . excluding parkway improvements. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover .the cost of constructing off -site street improvements from fut[ire development as it occurs north of this site. 10. Construct the City Master Plan Storm Drain in 24th Street from the project site to the Etiwanda Spreading 'Grounds. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited t) that portion of the construction costs incurred in constructing permanent drainage facilities snecified on the City's Master Plan of storm drains and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of allowable costs in excess of the fees in accordance with City policy. Any additional costs for over- sizing facilities for interim flood protection shall be borne by the developer.' 11. Plans for the 24th Street taster Plan Storm Drain shall be approved by the lity. Engineer and the Flood Control j District prior to e,��Proval of the Final Sop or issuance of building permits, W lr sever occurs firsts 12. The storm drain sys +.em within the project shall be designed to accommodate fl %ws from the property to the north upon its future e':Ydlopment in accordance with designated tributary areas for the 24th Street Master Plan storm drain. j 13. A permanent, flood protection facility shall be constructe6 j along the west property boundary as follows: d a) A concrete channel shall be constructed, as justified by the final drainage study approved by the City Engineer, with sufficient rapacity to allow extension of the chain: *.l along tha northwest property 'line of the propert�i to the north. It shall be fenced per City Standars. b) A 12 -foot wide paved access road shall be provided on PLANNING CO1MISSI• RESOLUTION NO. 88 -200 TT 13527 - Melcher September 28, 1988 Page S the east side of the channel for its entire length with acc_`z; provided at both ends to a'public Street. c) A permanent stdtm drainage easement Shall encompass the channel, debris basin, service roads and fences. d) The developer shall ° form or annex to a maintenance (` assessment district for this facility.. 14. If Southern California Edison agrees to the placement of all or part of the permanent flood protection facility within their easement, a permit from Southern California' Edison will be required for work within their right -of -way. 151 Interim drainage protection facilities shall be provided along the north project boundary. The design shall be ,justified by the final drainage study and approved by the City Engineer;.` .A zaintenance agreeant shall be executed to the satisfaction ))f the City Engineer and the City Attorney guararteeinr, private maintenance of the drainage Protection facility by 'a Homeowners Association, but pro7iding the City with the right -of- access to maintain the facility if private maintenance is insufficient and allowing the City to access those costs to the Homeowners Association. 16. The project shall contribute to the future construction of the €tiwanda /San Sevioe regional d:-ainagelflood control facilities by forming or annexing to a benefit assessment or a 'community facilities district or !y the payment of regional drainage fees as established by the City Council. FcrmaUon or annexation or fee payment shall be prior to Final Flap approval.. 17. Construct a 20 foot wide Community Equestrian Trail along _ the east project boundary. 18. Landscape maintenance easements shall be dedicated to the City for the area between the perimeter wall and the right- of-way on 24th Street, Etiwanda Avenue, and "L" Street between 2.1th and "ti" Streets. 19. Slopes with ?n landscape easements to be maintained b/ the City shall rot exceed 3;1, unless approved by the City Engineer, 20. Where streets are drained to storm drainage pipes (sump condition) in easements crossing private property, the easement shall be graded to accept dnd convey overflows from the street in the event of blockage in the pipe or catch basin. P -(b I PLANNING CCAMISSI RESOLUTION N04 88 -200 TT 13527 - Melche� September 28, "1988 Page 6 9. 21. Off -site improvements shn??, be provided for each phasli, of the 'development, as 'requi`red by the City Engineer, to provide drainage protection and two means of access for each phase. 22. The earthc,,ake fault location and building setback shall be shown on the final map. In addition, a deed restriction shall be attached to lots 24 thru 28 identifying the location of the fault, fault setbacks, and building limitations as approved by the City Planner. 23. The developer shall commence, participate in and consummate, or cause to be commenced, participated -in, or consummated, a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District for Foothill Fire Protection District to finance a fire station to serve the envelopment, including land facilities, equipment and operations and maintenance. The station shall be located, designed and built to all specifications of the F'osthill Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's., property upon co%>Ietion. The equipment shall be selected by District in accordance with: its needs. In any, building of the station, developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The Community Facilities District shall be formed by District and developer by the time of recordation of the final map. 24. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the potential Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a deposit on any property. 2b. The developer shalt provide designs for the ends of the cul-de-sacs to minimize the amount of concrete and maximize the amount of landscaping. 26. Approval of Tentative Tract 13527 is granted contingent upon Planning, Commission approval of a total Design Review package, prior to recordation of the final map, which may include the following revisions: jai Deletion of one'lot each at the e. ' these cul-de- sac streets; Street OW, Street "P -, street 1120. b. Provision for a paseo/'greenbelt system of trails; B. Design Review' =1. Prior to recordation of the final map, a complete Design Review package shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSP QESOLUTION NO. 88 -200 TT 13527 - Melche: September 28, 1988 Page 7 2. A comprehensive grading plan shall be submitted for ?eview a <,d approval by the Grading Committee prior to recordation of the final map. The plans shall address the following areas; a) The maxincm rear yard splits shall not exceed eight (8) feet when unretained or 12 feet with the °4se of a four (4) foot retaining wail. b) The maximum side yard splits shall not exceed four (4) feet. c) Split level pads, stem walls, and varying floor levels shall be incorporated to reduce grading. d) The maximum pad to ground differential of external boundaries shall not exceed eight (8) feet. e) All cross -lot drainage shall be within prfvate easements and improved devices. 3. The cul -de -sac for Street "A" adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue sh.11 be designed for emergency access to the s.."Iisfaction AML of the Foothill Fire District. 4. Lots which front onto "L" Street between "E" and "J" Streets shall have circular (preferred) or hammerhead driveways. All drive approa0es on lot 100 shall be north of a projection of the north right -of -way line for "N" Street. 5. Front yard landscaping and grrigatiir shall be provided on all cul -de sacs. The Final plans s' '1 be reviewed by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. - 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED W ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COVIISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC154ONGA it ATTEST: r PLANNING COMMISSIC 1ESOLMON NO. 88 -200 TT 15527 - Me1'cher September 28, 1988 Page 8 I, Brad Buller, Secre�ary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho :!scamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and -,gularly introduced, passed, a:ii�" adopted by the Planning Commission of the %;;ty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held or the 28th day of September, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS:- NONE ABSENT:. COWMISSIONERS: EMER"C, r: �` �� 4S s.v• tN Y Op r �i prq..�O� Y.«,� gyyyD��Q. �C 6Ss.G.ee CCg 0 YO1 tY YYY _OL NO NwO ^VL L�YL wlL. q�ny Ot L ♦�Y•+J �� �Y,� Y$••��N bi 40 L wN 45FA� �Q^�N rnC� w �� O � ±Y °��M.Oyyaa O� ` t��C"� gC� &NiiA;s ��7 O`■'� xr• ��~GN �A.NYCL pp_ `� Ow �yyw� ••CC. •■ YVy G'^�LYLO H Y CGC2 C�V d �OC wc�wie C�w� 7�C QpY ii. °a •'� wwY �1...�yRi ��s sy�SSN[js� ��N��YjjNMyY� yV ��O Yg� qa �`O tlgYO` Y CpY N�aR. � Y3�'� lyy Y zX Sg3$y���wY $ Sys$ rrV: i. A 4 +00 � YMM MJVe lit HI�C Y2 A�8r8 �^ C a S �L Y,�.nO y Ye4 AA Q �~ �y •� E.-IFs r:s� s `i "1 -a» all €a x's d M Y » M N V �y ` N Z .R? `•w .p i : h d erg e n M N a u W R M Y S aL 53� C O � nL �g 'Y° o Y C • gt C .Y3 a C Y O • a�„C X05: e - O � Y RL r� wa' v a r "8fi� Y «V ¢Y Y =4 M M qnr " M' fix« tt Y g ^� a.'4^oc 4Y�c�i p pY� Y 5�S -=�q$ M'� "3`$ f-N4N Y " V us ri n: Lr. Y!L,O Y A- - yC. ■V_ N a_ «- L �« r 2 -RE > \l��yyil dam L &� ` mill « F � , 3 L.g�g'dYo _Zolft yCS� Y a' V w O Y M = M jig L�3 " V N e N 1•f Ri low V � « Y C C r Y' q Its v } No' :.a Jim Y at ;s= its Y O• � * ! � � i � OHS X51. 1140 is Nii <Y -a I \�7 ,1 M fi 11M Y j1 4 y i� rY�Y �aasss Y t =11 M N Y a N i Y s « N N tl M - • Y, ` Q of= Y N 4 p �4Vi M ly F b Y Y(~ 8 yN NQ r => • "a N Y � LSD V �eca� LJ N rqm R �`tltl b i 5 p�L . I N = MLN �Y s� a 9` I v :� . x° :gsas s?� Jill �' e w o G �oy N' q? 6 ±.� Y 1=2 a ■a.a . Y-� S'` pMpa8 -41e `~ °yTYre `Yw C iii[[[ Out «.. MYL ~• » .'�Cy.YYrf eYe ` {` NwMy� !a tN iM(! FMi3 ll�t��we. �i� ^e Z� `�� +i �� � ► \ \311', \ ( ,�� �� e Is Nw_`i x s� `e `atll' YO' ri 11 A Ys « 6 � _ _Cs D as ZA Av Arm Et1C 4 :2 r» e 12 �• C Q ~ V M Y ~ Y M ~ � :, ?� O Y �� ^ e� YV RK y+ Y � B•r �M �•�Iy g«wee a� •� �; r i v..aL Y , M.. lk r ` ^� ��g •� w.g �e ` r —Y�x� a IN s _= €^ fir$; �•" 'Ila Ip■ ilia `V�3 �e� � :�— 'fioy•e ^�. �_� "��e 12i �2� g = ~yO °tr y♦ $ � Y`O � �VY1�Z1 i6y «• <�ar �. $ r�;,0« �0« tY R� F:C V°w q ��i'O GM` W�Z�4�i .°rs y N yC/7 L y� Zvian lit `o 3��5 � L �qaQ■ S� i DD `m ate --,2 sx N 7Lloa gA�yy� g�� ±�� a A .�gi ^ as sN by A L G {C� wrLi n sit E.0.�1C ■■ O qi� a a —L 11 C fTN0Y +1 p V Ila. fi_L p IV u �1 5� 41 Ita w! �v 9 ! > N �F` i zic vi v. � _ NN Y�•yl9 Q» �� V.y $ YMy �p�' �:NO AI`1 Y•�gt � ®Y M day °V4ea `b � t' yyYY � ■`t�■ � 4 »C a��^ 1�cc�. Y a 'q� tlGi��tl•fR +4� Sri y q�� Ya W ss y .=,.N4�•�J G� a :ice ���� C aa.'�ys�►� 2! IY O *es ' i O g8 3 is �gY N� A w ~ M�` Y i� V� sA s S A L + y L�•O C �' a CNC YL O �� Or w Its GYY pLLV` LV� A a yy Vy`y -*02 l • �k'e•N •Y� �. lc gal q�Y N�w 1 b-9 o $Ne �! g�a Wp� XFan°�'aa lata �oti »l•i8, y�O LEA �000 Oi -iE LAv C11 6, y4y � f. � �. C bi {L ^' �g O1 Ogt�i yC pV. geto n N �.il� YydQ �+ ~•• M yolS •'i�r Nn 4�Y •, »!�6• ��.� M: as` fEy 42r,a a" -1 yC/7 L y� Zvian lit `o 3��5 � L �qaQ■ S� i DD `m ate --,2 sx N 7Lloa gA�yy� g�� ±�� a A .�gi ^ as sN by A L G {C� wrLi n sit E.0.�1C ■■ O qi� a a —L 11 C fTN0Y +1 p V Ila. fi_L p IV u �1 5� 41 Ita w! �v 9 ! > N �F` i zic vi v. � _ NN Y�•yl9 Q» �� V.y $ YMy �p�' �:NO AI`1 Y•�gt � ®Y M day °V4ea `b � t' yyYY � ■`t�■ � 4 »C a��^ 1�cc�. Y a 'q� tlGi��tl•fR +4� Sri y q�� Ya W ss y .=,.N4�•�J G� a :ice ���� C aa.'�ys�►� 2! IY O *es ' i O g8 3 is �gY N� A w ~ M�` Y i� V� sA s S A L + y L�•O C �' a CNC YL O �� Or w d y N L ✓ �' ! es yy Vy`y L tai C� • �k'e•N •Y� �. lc q�Y O'p $Ne �! i�i1ia Wp� 01+8 K�� »l•i8, S: • � 0 rA� O1Vyy� LAv C11 6, y4y � f. � C bi {L `VV �• V 1 N n m M. LIM 9 d E r�YG V'. Rf �CY ,d~i M�J6laL S� c. N c MoC.0 � �� 01. Y�O� Lys OA pqNq 8 O.i=� P �� .CNO 81wq )f`L\ Y tl w0. CO.Na L ++a- .�r°yno dy j yQ yyyr �SyY`` L CO 4 N. fa 8a EiY� G� v N• N '�� ° � f ^j MyL� .� V• pp"CC a V S CIS �,L O" Vy g^q9 N Lvp a■ >p Y'g �},w YCB •. pp6 Y �� 'O tl� O V� C Y• 'NL v�$1 y §.• C co wYM� r .$�`" xI. wry. v gip. + o► �. y. s± ^� CO �q CL n ^g y� �S w�M M .D Y. L L ^ MC40■ Y C 'vs,ia ai €'•Yk w `.S ^ai .° .i $ $ e� •wag gg M. irs 5 c== 'b' "� �dn riy.pCi YTPM L0. ^3��1'�Yli Ye�Q •V R: lT �p t� �u C+ Is � pf � g � a v N LY lag q ITL p9 C `w� Z�ftgq 'S N ie. • y °P��.i �'o � � ml®= '�"��G' `I i.5 a"it Y� Ny OY �jf.��p �� �0�� •� Y Cq WtlM �!;��y Y ~ L y y Qiw 0`i N7N C� ~�i �•Ni. �LO i� O^ C �� O Mc�. ARM O° R It a ^C I w - d O I —� 91 s�f Y V C it as rY`y� $qL� 7J S wrg e� r.V t ■ C Y N JS N IS iI O N n' � 2, —'. 9 ou Yj A l`� gas - s M71JE" all ` :e _= 1 c ww.a� ccY '�a�• °a i lit w� Y Y M_ •Y Y O ®y100 y, "s �$ � Lv b=u. G �� w a wr' j r I B M itea 11 aC C°iu tl �. '� 'j 47 4 w prp r• C R� N 0 YY V • ~ �y L w q "I Y � M �pppr `. �wLN .C`� r•'•Lb N W �''g1=V =JwM y y ^p L Q w a i .r w r :Z 1�.. s M a�qi ��q r: Oyy"6 ,`,j P O ■■11 �? ao gaa _ a � Vii° a iswr ,1`sa 3 la si& :Y" at 2. �C. fig` �L �.eaV�L w� �� ~�► � M� a,$� r hull^��0,. Mass H® in U H N �� 6`M WMM . ! CS w - d O I —� 91 s�f Y V C it as rY`y� $qL� 7J S wrg e� r.V t ■ C Y N JS N IS iI O N n' � 2, —'. 9 ou Yj A l`� gas - s M71JE" all ` :e _= 1 c ww.a� ccY '�a�• °a i lit w� Y Y M_ •Y Y O ®y100 y, "s �$ � Lv b=u. G �� w a wr' j r I B M itea 11 aC C°iu tl �. '� 'j 47 4 w prp r• C R� N 0 YY V • �y L w q "I Y � M �pppr L Q w a i .r w r :Z 1�.. s M a�qi ��q r: Oyy"6 ,`,j P O ■■11 _ a � w - d O I —� 91 s�f Y V C it as rY`y� $qL� 7J S wrg e� r.V t ■ C Y N JS N IS iI O N n' � 2, —'. 9 ou Yj A l`� gas - s M71JE" all ` :e _= 1 c ww.a� ccY '�a�• °a i lit w� Y Y M_ •Y Y O ®y100 y, "s �$ � Lv b=u. G �� w a wr' j r I B M itea 11 aC C°iu tl �. '� 'j 47 4 w prp r• C R� N 0 s� Zo a u. �a iSw d v a Z�� a b x s s Xx a yyy = O r tq y Y L $ G�g r� Cr�jl r v3 X:6- Y^ 3.T ei u MaS Z `' qy rdayYy zb. sis C 6.: �.rb OMB - iaN u° Yp_Mtl 0Y • iiCM yi �O A O M C .fy L WA qq4 e y y sil 09-5 a 061 ay �NY� M�w•_� tl M ` � ���. wane. uo2sia 6 i< q iii 6 py -M �jt M 2 �Y °YOq gpZe N Ypq� Z g.�. Y yN �Y. qq� Ytl p !/ ws Ytl a} b Ytl 07 Q aii � ► +. trC�pt R� �Y �M� �9 Y 4N F� lk E !e !.e= w a 1iJ �tttt �a a iqr H yYg3 tl s �Q ty �_+yy ei u w 3g j zb. sis VY p i Y 0p� 64. ws2 a. 13 tl_ 13 y �w Y W�wG O =9 BZ'� ZY Lr+ Nn'p� gCA � r N � i j( RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION' AND ADDING A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13527 CONSISTIM OF 231 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. OR 88,48 ACRES Or LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER A,CRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANuri AVENUE /,,ND 24TH STREET APN: 225- 071 -65.- A. Recitals (i) Entec Consultanl,,s has filed an application for the extension of Tentative Tract 13527 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, in the Resalutionr the subtect Time Extension request is referred to as "the applica -tion." (ii) On September 28, 1988, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 88 -200 thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and tirm� limits, Tentative Tract 13527, and issued i'Negative Declaration. (iii) On July 5, 1490, the applicant filed a request for a 12 -month time extension (iv) On September 26 1990, the Planning' Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed puhlic hearing on the appli „ation and concluded said hearing on that: date. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the 'Planning Commission of the City o? Rancho Cucam;mga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically. finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidc,r:#,s presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing; an September 26, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows! a. The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial r, compliance with the City's current General Plan and Development Code; b. The extension r- the Tcntative Map wiil not cause significant inconsistencies with t;.�, current General Plain and Development Code PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 13027 WATT INLAND EMPIRE September 26, 1990 Page 2 The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to caNse public he.;th or safety ,problems; and d. The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance. 3, cased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby rpproves the application subject to each and n every condition set forth below: 1) All Conditions of Approval as contained in Plannin3 Commission Resolutions No. 88 -W and 88 -200A shall apply. 2) Approval shall _xpire on September 26, 1991, unless extended b!- the Planting Commission. . 3) Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building perm;'ts, whim ever comes first, the applicant shall c' -ent= to, 6r F,articipate`in, the establishment G, a Mel Ior!<oos ` Community Facilities District. pertaining to the project site t" in conjunction with the applicable School District, for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. Howeb,�r,� if any School District has priviously established such a Community Facilities District, t,ie applicant sail, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of bai'ding pe,,mits, whichever canes first. Further, If the aff.,ected School District has not formed a Mello -Roo, Community Facilities District • with,n 12 months of the date of approval of the time extension and prier to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition small be: deemed null and ve..i. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolutlon. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.4MONfiA � 1 BY: I Carry T. S..Nirl, Chairman ;a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION i0. TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 13527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE September 26, 1990 Page 3 W. ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary~ "-' I, Brad Buller, Secretary of tie Planning Commission of the Cucamonga, do hereby certify that th City of Rancho e foregoing Resolut C" Was duly and regularly introduced, Passed: the Planning Commissi and adopted by ;nn of the City of Rancho Cuca7,os,ga, at a reg +filar meeting of the Planning Commission held art the 26th day of September 1990, �y the following vote -to -wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; DATE: TO: PROM; BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGs1 STAFF REPORT i i x 1 j .jS t I September 263 1990 i Chairman and Members of the P13nning Commission I Brad Buller, City Planner i Jerry Ouarracino, Assistant Planner i TIME EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -42 - KOTOFF A prnposal to construct: 168 apartment units on 9.03 acres of land in the Medium- •liigh Residential District {14 -24 dwelling units per acre} located < north of Base Line Road, 550 feet east of Day Creek Channel - APN 227- 091 -21. Associited wi+h the project is Tree Removal Permit 87 -67. I. BACKGR09ND: Development Review 85 -42 was originally ipproved rn October 14, 1987, subject to all of the conditions ,set forth in Planning Commission Resolution Hu. 87 -x,78 (attached). Subsequently, the Planning Commission granted a one -year time extension antic October 14, 1990. On July 5, 1590, the applicant:, Mr. William J. Kotaff, requested a second extension of the approval in order to allow hint more time to proceed with the project. The development Code Section 17.02.1403, states that extensions may (upon making certain findings) be granted °n 12 -month increments, not to exceed a total of four years from the original date of approval:. The applicant is currently re9ttesting a one -year time extension which would expi; - -e on October 14, 1991. II. REQUIRED FINDINGS- Section 17.02.10US, states that the Planning Commission may extend the approval of a project if the following findings can be made: 1. That there has bean na significro- changes in the lane use element, Development Code, or character of the area within which 0o project is located that would cause the approved project to become inconssrtent or non- confozning. 2. That the granting of an extension should nut be detrimertal to the public health„ safetyq or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the .ticinity. i 111. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension and has compared the project with current development criteria outlined in the Development Code and the Victoria Community Plan. Based upon i'1'FM c i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 85 -42 - KOTOFF SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 2 this review, staff has determined that the project is inconsistent r " th the basic development standards of the Medium -Hijh Alsidentia District (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) and the Victoria Community Plan standards as well as several "Planning Department, Engineering Department and Fire Department policies. The following is a discussion of these inconsistencies: Planning D';vislon: Site Plan - The previously approved project is inconsistent wl`h } Parkin)t Regulations of the rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cv.;.. f Specifi.aliy, the approved plans call for one carport per unit with no garage 'spaces. Chapter 17.12 (which was amended November 18, 1987, just one month after the approval of this tiroject) re4uires one half of the 168 carports to be enclosed garages. This requirement could be satisfied relatively easily by the addition of garage doors to one half of the proposed carportsi . which were originally designed with three enclosed sides. The project also exceeds the number of allowable uncovered compact spdces. Chapter 17.12 allows a maximum of 35 percent of the required uncovered spaces to be compact;, therefore, a maximum of 62 compact spaces are allowed by code. This is far less than the 125 compact spaces originally approved. Changing 63 spaces from compact to standard spaces rill require a redesign of the proposed site plan. When the project was oriCinally approved, the surrounding land uses were undetermined and therefore, the project was designed to allow reciprocal access to adjacent sites via any of four possible locations. Since .hen, the Redevelopment Agency and Firt Department have begun plans for a new fire station northeast o_• this project. Plans for this "sta:�ion include the construction of a cul -de -sac -%ich will terminate at the east boundary of the subject site just north of the large Oak tree and run eastward to the future Day Creek Boulevard. A drivewry connection to this future cul- de-sac is desirable to divert some of the traffic- associated with this project away from Base Line Road. Additionally, an entrance in this location would better facilitate emergency access to the site which, due to this great depth relative to its width, might be difficult from the Base. Line Road entrance. Fortunately, the site plan could be modified to allow sn access as discussed without moving any of the proposed structures. However, the original connection planned for the northeast corner of the site would no longer be possible, resulting in a awkward dead end. a.' ... PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 85 -42 - KOTOFF SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 3 t Engineering Division: Project Entrances - The approved project calls for the construction of only one access into this 168 unit ap=.rtmont project. Further, this entrance is to be temporary until the property to the +?st develops. At that time, the entrance is to be replaced with a permanent entraW., 75 feet east of the westerly project boundary. A recently centpleted median island opening study for a new project on 'he same site has determined that the proper location for a shared access is considerably further west of the approved permanent entrance. Therefore, the developer should obtain an access easement and construct a drive aisle a minimum of 26 feet wide on the property to the west for access from the project site to the location of the median opening on Base Line Road which is approximately 935 feet west of the centerline of proposed ►lay Creek Boulevard. The project should be conditioned to require that the easement be obtained and the location approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. '0ie project is inconsistent with tide Fire Protection District's policy of requiring two fill means of access. Therefore, an emergency only access to Ba.: Line Road at the east property line will need to be redesigned as a full entrance, which will be shared by any futtire - project east of this site. The current design would require traffic for the easterly site to travel almost half -way through the proposed project before entering the easterly property. A rvidesign of the circulation pattern is required to allow access -to the easterly property at d location just north of Base Line Road. Railroad Avenue Vacation Between ;fie project site and the railroad property is a 40 -foot street easement tailed Pailroadd Avenue South. The 6eneial Plan calls for a community trail along the length of the railroad right -of -way. A study is underway to determine if it's appropriate to abandon this easement. Tie Railroad Company has or, numerous occasions expressed their opposition to the abandonment. The approved project however, has been designed assuming the abandonment would be approved,. Shouid this not come to pass, the project would riaE.d to be redesigned. Off -Site Improvements Recently, the Flood Control Distric? has not allowed any new connections to the unimproved portion of the Day Creek Channel south of Base Line Road. TSiat portion of the channel is scheduled to begin construction in October, 2990, and will be operational approximately -nine months later. The conditions of approval therefore, should be modified to require that the project plans, building permits, and occupancies be tied to the channul work. G 'J 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT " OR 85 -42 - KOTOFt SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 4 4 Pursuant to the street improvement implemental �,n policy, the i Victoria Community !lon and the following stree,1 improvement shall � i a be required as a resit o- the proposed proj4:ct: a. Provide the necessary right-of-way dedications and construct Base 4.ine Road full width from Day Creek Channel to the east side of Day Creek Boulevard including the intersection and landscape median island improvements (with partial reimbursement from southerly properties). b. A contribution in -lieu of the construction of Ray Creek Boulevard shalt be paid by the developer. Said contribution shall be a proportional amount based on,area of the project. Recent Engineering policy requires the developer to provide flood r protection for all sites with firm Zone "A" desiCnations. Also, the developer is required to prepare all necessary reports, plOs, hydrologic /hyd'eiulic calculations, etc., to have F1:MA officially remove the Zone "A" flood designation prior to occupancy. This will relieve the future tenants (homeowners if thr• project is ever converted to condom?niums) froir the obligation of purchasing flood insurance. l IV. ANALYSIS SUMMARY: Although the project is inconsistent in many regards, most of the inconsistencies can be rectified by the �► addition of variou cY.�itions to the approval of the project.. However, four itezi r— id regr:ire redesigning the project. They are: a. Changing the excess number of compact spaces to standard spaces. b. Providing a secRnd permanent / shared entrance at the easterly property line and the mo,iement southward of the reciprocal access point. c. The redesign of the northern portion of the site if Railroad' l Avenue South is not abandoned (a likely possibility). d. Designing a nex privary ent -ince westerly of the site to line up with the nroposeo median break on Base Line Road. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The following findings arc provided for the Commission's consideration: I a. There have been changes to Chapter 17.12 Parking Regulations of the Development Code which cause the approved project to tecome Iiieansistent or non - conforming: t �i PLANNING rOMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 85 -42 • KOTOFF SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page G b. The lack of two full means of access is inconsistent with tha Fire Protection District's policy, and would be detrimental to the public health, safety and ;ielfare. c. The proposed project is inconsistent with the street improvement Implementation policy of the Victoria Community Plan. d. Changes in the character of the area within which the project is located including, the newly pre posed fire station, the County's decision to maintain the aid fire s ).ition property west of the site as a County yard, and the p",attirtg of median breaks withi Base Line Road have caused the approved project to become inconsistent or non -cql 7orming with current Planning, Engineering, and Fire Protection District pokicies and the Development Code. e. The amendment of the Victoria Community plan to include this site has caused the project to become inconsistent with the objectives and policies of the Victoria Community Plan. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newsprner as a public hearing, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VII. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission dM the Time Extension for Development Review 8-5-42 through adoption of the attached Resolution. However, if the Commission can support the Time Extension, then staff would request a continuance to prepare appropriate conditions of approval to address non- conformities. ` Respectfully submitted, V Brad Buller City Planner BB:JG:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit "C" Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations Resolution No. A7 -178 Resolution of Denial Cr _RECEIVSE�- July 5, 1990 of{+11�iPi0 jot Jerry Iuarrclano A rla; zing Dept. u City of Aancho 9310 Baseline d. _rancho Cucamonga Cal 91730 mr. Jerry Cuarrci.ano; This letter is a; request foe a one-year ext ahsian f_o�� my 168 apts an 9.03 ac, Nlz Base Line, Z/a Day Creek, File No. DR86. n. Enclosed is t}, :^egvired check. for $67000. i Would you pLez: se acre that this request is placed before the proper office. Thank you for your time and halp. oir�c erel�. 2406 A Sacada Cir. C,,rlsbad Cal. 92009 .CARYN PLANNED -c 0 M m U N iLiuCiEluuLluuCIE3�l----Izic3—c3c3E3S, 4" W, ol w ol Of V T0.91 I C T 0 R I lAcET'll V.P.C. 404 1/4-0 COMMUNITY =1 Ic Pit VPC MMUNITY L m r I �Q—W*row ■ PI C. 'AND-7 7� • a Ova m A 173 r— w x 131 El ■ -Lf A • mg ■ • • ■ RA.NOiD CUCAMONGA TITLE- PLA.NNI:'-Z DWISM EXHIFlT---.bL—SC'%LEA 0701 -02; 09- 26-90 P6 Agenda 4 of 6 o a O tifr 1f ��M 1110 r � ri llf� a ��I WI rpCITY F M CUC+ MOW PL-A.NN M. ERN'fiSM Im �J WRTt ! TITLE: _ 4M -AA ' MOd'1': ---C,— SCALE- I U7, i �4 v t F 2 4 c= it r CITY OF 4e A--ile RANCHO CLEAN JGNGA TITLE: PLANNING F)RISOI EXHIBIT: �._ __° � SCALE: 'I. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -178 RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION •, ;,PPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 85 -42 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 168 APARTMENTS OH 9.03 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICc LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE. OF BASE LINE `ROAD, 550 FEET EAST 0. DAY CREEK CHANAEL - APN: 227 - 091 -11 A. Recitals. ( ) William Kotoff has filed an appl;La. °nn for the approval of Develonwnt Review No. 85 -42 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the of 14th of October, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Raric" Cucamorga conducted a, meeting on the application 2nd concluded saiC meeting on that date. (iii) All Legal prerequisites zo the adoption of this Resel4ition ha:e occurred. B. RC,:znlution. NON, THEREFORE, it is he •eby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cveamonga:as follows 1. Thin Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the f)-xts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon s0stantial evidence p► *esented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on October 14, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located oa the s,orth side cf Base Line Road, 550 feet east of Cay Creek Channel with a street frontage of 342 feet and lot depth of 1110 feet and is present1y vacant; and (b) The property to the north, south, east, and west are designated for residential uses. The property to the north, south and eat is presently vacant. The properly to the west is developed with a fire station. (c) The proposal, with the recommended conditions of approval, com,;,.- s with the minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (d) The development of 168 apartments is consistent with the Medium -High Residential lead ese designation of the General Plan. PLANNING COMMIS: .i RESOLUTION N0. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -42 KOTOFF October 14, 1987 Page 2 ti 3. Based upon the substantial eviden «e presented to this Commission during. the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific finding, of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General plan-, and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is locited; and (c) That the proposed use is in coWliance with each of the applicable Provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicably thereto, will not be detrimental to She public health, safety, or welfare, or a6atteially incurious to properties or improves Ys in the vicinity. Alk 4. This Commission hereby finds cnd certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance With the California Environmental Quality Act of 1930 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Dec%ration• S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth In paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached - hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.` A. Planning Division - 1, The following items shall be incorporated into the final landscape and irrigation plan which are subject to review and approval by the Design I Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits: a. A perimeter wall /fence with pilasters shall be required around the site. C2corative, non -view obscuring fencing shall be provided at open space areas. The remainder of the fence shall be constructed of a decorative material consistent with the architecture of the units. PLANNING COMafISS . RESOLUTION NO. PEVLLOPMENT REVIEW 85,42 - KOTOFF October 14, 1987 Page 3 b. Landscaping shall be provided adjacent to the emergency access at the southwest corner of the site to obscure visibility i down the drive aisle. c. A visual corridor shall be provided from Base Line Road to the central open space. d. The oak tree at the northern <portion of the site shall be preser,fed in place. No landscaping or irrigation shall be Installed within the drip line of the ,tree. The sidewalks shall be ;aaligned to an area outside the drip line of the tree. 2. A final acoustical analysis shall be stiomitted to ensure that noise levels do not exceed the maximum permit by Code. The building plans shall be revised to incorporate necessary mitigation measures. The report and the plans shell be reviewed and approved by the City planner prior Alk to the. issuance of building permits. 3. A trellis consistent with the architectural them shall ae provided on the side elevations. The i plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The trees located Athin the Base Line right-of- way shall be replaced in the new streetscape setback area with the largest nursery grown trees available as determine4 by the City Planner. ' S. a The trash enclosure closest to the oak tree shall be relocated to the and of the carport across the j driveway aisle to the southeast. 6. The sound attenuation wall along Base Line shall be offset and softened with bermed landscaping. B. Engineering Division 1. Easements for reciprocal use over and across all drive aisles and access points. within the project in favor of the properties gocated to the east and west of the project site shall be provided prior to issuance of building permits. PLANNING CORMISS .a RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEd 85 -42 - KOTO'FF October 14, 19$7 Page 4 2. An agreement and surety shall be provided for the removal of the temporary 'access and replacement of street improvements when permanent access to the 'west is provided on Base Line Road. Permanent access to the area shall be provided at a minimum of BOG feet from the centerline of proposed Day Creek Boulevard. 3. This project is located within a Zone "A" Flood Hazard Area due to the possible overflow from Day Creek Channel, Final plans 'shall not be accepted for review" nor building '. and grading permits issued until Phase It of the Day Creek Channel project is under construction. 4. Storm drain pipe and catch basins shall be constructed on Base Line 'Road to connect to the Day Creek Channel to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. S. An �n -lieu fee for one -half the cost of the construction, including landscaping and irrigation, for the median island on Base Line Road shall be paid to the City prior to t, "% issuance of building permits. The fee shall be based on the - length of the Base Line Road frontage of the project, the amount to be determined by the City; Engineer. 6. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Base Line Road shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite east of the east project boundary to the first pole offsite west of the west project boundary, prior to public improvment acceptance or, occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one- half the City adapted cost for undergrounding from future development as it otcurs on the opposite side of the street is feasible because the property is undevelop d. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Comission shall certify` to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNI46'C"IS, I RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -42 - KOTOFF October 14, 1987 Page 5 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ATH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY:�. arry . c a rman ATTEST. i Y r, opu y< secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamongaa, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, wTIEA, EMCRICK, MCNIEL NOES: C"ISSIONERS. NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BONE i v z V W `'O fj�O �qY ry`tl.~ 'NC rY�r�O J1�u�C' L 0 0 Y C i G 'NJ pL M. Y oc Y• f. C V L V •► f ' C Y :CLgSW .i'�r YV O Y VQ w�o >f•�. li �.O NT.. 999��rr{pp3��°s�sem�C�� ,� yY LIL O YY O C^ fr° �� rf��• �p��1 f��Yly, ��,qC Y ~o � y�iY e�Y 4 a ���OS.. e^ �qa i � o J�.N .a 46i CS ^ � Y L�r 9y I fOL M O L/•yy^T .Y lro fOSp a � Yy �yy 00 � LLC »a°cyyCe —�u u »w �- .2�1 ���``Ltl�yf1�l 0'q.� 4 Y`��j f9�. >U` ^ V g'y}j�'rp�_ MpM spy ®V 6e V X®6l$p rB Br 9f ®®i (f a SNagi v "*0.±s .SO l W 6 0 1i NN Y♦ Y g L 6 b�^tl a e 8+T M S V a �w M Rill yNy it e� 4 x v Li kj Cps_ N 4Y GO IS �yYuV Y, VIz— 4�O�YmVVUt 1.r.. --a y DUE wC u_ °O S O C� 6 Y N . 4 �/ a ,C �:'6N VYY�_ycM �V1 V Vq®Cy L �QQY CC �n (E::j1 01O gZa"aN N Q N L Yn TO Y y X61 Y9 Y C a N p.- d.N 6tl ffiz Lyp lb^ M_w a ty;� i£LyOM /+ �9• �M� +b' W i J o' L N y O O ^� qq6 C M 01 . L O• c t Y® V m O ypo HiNd � \�I 2 1 z Z� if Zi y A N- 1- .0 a a Fr A s yP O Y TL4 f! Krr 32 11s 3~ M �ZZ� ZZ 1 s � `$ , s> yv SAIM V Lp}. i.1 W4 C y w- Y Y1YN � r y O p vi o-AcPzz N L -Sib g 2.!.8 yd f� yC V— ro Y yy C a TL LCOe.�2Y9y� .21 L L.6 Vr y Myy tl aYOY ^C ax I fair Li ��w 0er4 w.a`.�i��N'. .+teeg� N Yaocs p TiyOtl %S381 O 0 ` L Y. %`2 yy r Np�O y y bill TL U1101L MIX p p t M M > Hat S 3N�Mye6 t��"�':i O yQ lire w~ >�'� 8-ss$. °�(� °dtW o . ¢�.Vi� w rC V .Oj ar{�q �pB�Y.JYN rCO.y f. Yi �17 ,I N ' A.O ;y C ` G ^QC qY YC 1•f C .�. tL.. zY a L•'! f', °�`3 a. .rY.,�t, N.�.� �c �O+1Y•��- a °�.Y.� iila�a V^. �Lpt `i ^Q LMR L GV Y� CY CdO tY�YO �O _ ^ �CCYY �l7Y. Q=g ECb� N ♦♦ L N �•0 . �y C �((( � ' i YC YY �` . �gf_i YrN CY e . y�J s +q .+>�p 1 Q ` C 0 {{AY���� r•N�O HYfY . (N4 6I1 � M�YA {aL�^ yYi i M Y>Y . ��V lSOY " s f g • y _i '� N. tl^d? y . CM L • ^ Gy l if yTC iyp O Q C V O O C oo o �M O�YOL ON 7L A ^� •�L ��i.V OO�rY�W_C SOn�rr y- +NO« C Fit Y' ppy �L� V`A4 N •4L� O '(6`� ~J ' j,''ypy[4+^ s0tlLytp(- f "2L YO raA i�YN. 6�^ N 0��°yy0 OC NCC V GY CI O+ ON LAY, - °eN.Y AL N��6^ G y YYm}4 � •v��{Qy ^�.�gJpz� wY.yYN �N p�� g�C MYM S ^Y••O,,nCC Q C _SCc >•$� °�}ry'� HCM�N t. N.� <.� =N0 rM� 4N•�V �= �01��8Y 64�L. t4 �$�vyNj `4� NI �O I� �O �Ot �.�•r . M a VAN .5 CCYY d °O ND a p sY°_s. tl �� {�q��cY,�C � LYt Mq. y VSq•M pNO N 4i� t 3.3 pw'N•i � O -% 4 ape iE I* `g P 4 1 o A� � Q HIS qq CC�� . yV .p i 6 4.prC y� ~ ^y Y4y 46 Y' a Ni ^ •V rY' 6Y =y 4w Qz i. _ 3 a m a y dim v asp yqr ��y• s j ^ m CG i a' b i A N Al 4` Yf • a G- � g ij ie0.t�. 3. ��pN °O•' Ya yb _i CCoe �° 1L 4.. * r i OO OY j fps 2�e__ fyy C + r •� N r M� O� L� IT 1•� wN. i i. b � a c $o s tr E waaste� W N _ Vyp Yy. °•~LGY se $QU= L.Nw.=�. i 9D o Y _ C all l t! C N 1� M 4 q+ Q 4 uCI _12t 4. r94 p V L y 1 3$M L YOcB YO ASP �°L $!�' • fLJ� tgal aft I NqN C�; N}Yw °im` V i4nn °� ~- tiv°aLy"'A�L 69- `'fLtl� •3w�{{� SC u ���« AMCe avyF $ _ ON Mix Nay" y &�1p Ny N � Ti I �O 09 s �yy �� • 2 \ O YQ L Y O s i d' kA g`pgr X 2 5 � } yak S '�� y V E (� y ` cQ ■ e�j$3 �t�_ r y Y §' C r s yam" u •w uU+% r n3 L 1 1 Y iqr Z it i.z . ;� g N g . Y •. +,. MIcc 01�gq i � N ���` a Y • �o a ��Y o 1; IS "°` N.�O 6 i1M �T ^ V.r 4S x 1 OY .01T � w < � 4 s 1 F l' i, f O l• M e W L4. W O a � Y r V r a Z 41 p Yee ~' :6 N� Y + C OL.G ` we 1.F=11 4N`'J iw qiPV o � i Q [ \Li4 L � 4 gilt A yy C O 4 � tl spy, ®'� ia.O q —$y yi4 L� f� �•qq• Y 9 y CVC yoO `�OV�tl~ :1�i �Y .k p�i ` .a M33o'Op z Yp� Y YM�M 6V 1°►�y 'O LYY �aj W:s4 aow +$ -o a o joill 3g" D .� ~Y �° YiE Q1 .b.St O Q c c Y u�i' Y-' =C :JV C^NgY +xM O O O. O'4^Y » .ice «�P1 SJ`� vv CO b�N ��b* K +�afd� � oa NN2_ Q �- v - Z .v `. ♦ O+ 3 C " N Q YZ ..go.�i �4 Yg pal a '�i5. �^ i e S .� 2 S` A x 171 Y Z33 it I a O Y N r i Y»Y i M W �re P � V � » yvee Y S. 6Y SZLx i _ cc C O • N FI f1 Vi M R W� c jr- o p'A-i Le- a .. -. ' d`'2j r�tl. -.s-.A4 ov v-� v ai e, pipe as R byee`` =A�_`� °O« as Tb' 0 u� S,SO� Y..Fy QY }j� Z. 3M 6Y a'Y °�LY�wo � �ww-6 jr ^LpP !r is N�M� SM Q^ ^�3®i 4 R i ti V'« S x F oe ` O. E ' •� a qu Z + Y N ' M 7K i • ■V ,Oa Y Y 6p�. �. O `eO 2 8 iD •` YYr'g $ P'sj �t•N' y ~Y lm. •_ , -0%= MN• MAE «Y � OO as GGG U ° e At a��TL ` 4e�O2L 1.q9 ip e ~ d N tT WN WYV 0 tLi 7r�l t > l Y It Aa M e d v +Ph W 4 E pal 5 3�a $$s YY �~Y US ..W at' g #_ +: .w sY. +a'v33u�a`. y��.i +�F.B M p� Q+ w_ ♦. y " y�aG y si.y`yli N v y G M y LA Y � �►a i� a } f ` V l 1 \ �, s 7� M - w w d 4c ° K IIIy9fr S E i y 4� 4 lit Cu »fig 3'M lit .� S 4V V r Q� N A,, N PI I «sa s-17 is ts F' 46 1 a� 4 U Y. x xa — s x 1 -1 _rIN71 --I ill via. if a ��.. M� N, rt wit � 4iwa � iMkM i M 1 q i 1 1 V W L Y LG Y oz L Y D 7 �{p p! V w � Ymw av O j ti ws o�s -,c ZZo -I O CVOs wGB. •� yy i uiam M $ C Y + a 0 N $ Chi M c OC syy IN ggqiqqq� r, �a N +moo z Ins wM 73 Sao 3 erg^ 'grN -z-S gg '3.e its a v�, e w �i✓ .�.'_= z z icy �"' ws su arv� h N $ Chi M c � 6A� �V$ ggqiqqq� WW yiY `iwa wM 73 3 erg^ 'grN -z-S gg '3.e its a v�, e w �i✓ .�.'_= z z icy �"' ®aVy su is oz ve =r M$ Ell- ytlrwY + ��v1 0'•7 '� Z �.a 6�1 LY� iGYz FNA. RESOLUTION N0. i A RESOLUTION OF YHE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A TIME EXTENSION F02 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 85 -42 LOCATED NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, 550 FEET EAST OF DAY CREEK CHANNEL IN THE MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4 -24 OWELLIR'S UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN, 227- 091 -21 A. Recitals. (il Mr. William J. Kotoff has filed an application for the approval of a Time Extension for Development Review Ne, 85 -42 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafte►, in this ?solution, the subject Tir,:c Extension request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the of 26th day of September, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. J. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts .:t forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution acre true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission dur`ng the above - referenced meeting on September 2&, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows;. i (a) The application applies to property located north of Base Line Road, 550 feet east of Day Creek Channel, with a street frontage of 342 feet and tot depth of 1,130 feet and is presentey vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subj' -t site is Southern Pacific Railroad, Low- Medium; the property to the south of that site is vacant, regional related Office /Commercial; the property to the east is vacant, Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre), and the property to the west is a Fire Station,. Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre). E PLAVAIN6 COMMISSIOM1 RESOLUTION NO. DR K-42 - KO,-OFF SEP'sEMbER 26, 1990 Page 2 (c) There have been changcs to Chapter 17.12 Parking RFgulations -+f the Development Code which cause the approved project to become I, i.xonsis; +enr or non- conforming. (d) The lack of two full means of access is inconsistent with ` the Fire Protection District's policy and would be detrimental to the put;ic II health, safety and welfare. (e) The proposed project•, is inconsistent with the street improvement implements' -an policy of the lictoria Community Plan. (f) Changes in the character of the area within which the project is located including, the newly proposed fire station, the County's decision to maintain the old =ire station prop.ms-ty west of the site as a County gird, and the plotting of median breaks within Base Line Road have caused the approved project to become inconsistent or non- conforming with current Planning, Engineering, and Fire Protection District policies and the Development Code. (g) The amendment of the Victoria Community Plan to include this site has caused the project to become inconsistent with the objectives Wild policies of the Victoria Community Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -refe enced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this "ammission herety; finds a_id concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is not consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed vee is not in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site_is located; and (c) That the proposed use is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) Twat the proposed use may be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Q. Based upon the findings and' conclusions sat forth in paragraphs 1, 2; and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. S. The Secretary to t;iis Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTTOV NO. DR 85 -42 KOTOFF SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 3 f i APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I. i BY, r Larry T. McNiel, Chairman i ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad duller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the 'City of Rancho Cucamrdiga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and rarplarly introduced, passed, and adopted, by the Planning Commission, of the City c.7 Rancho Cucamonga, at a regularireeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of September 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: �. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: i HOES: COMMISSIONERS: i ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; E. Surrounding General Plan and Development rode Designations. North - School - South Office Park East Medium high Density Residential West - Medium Density Residential ITr"!�1 I S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 26, 1950 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer' BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer _I SUBJECT: ENVIROWZNTAL ASSESSMEWT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL W 11287 - Lewis owes - A subdivlslofi 8. 5.3 acres of a'�'nc Into I pare MIKE Park District or the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the northwest earner of Church Street and Elm Avenue (APN., 1077- 421 -41) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uested: Approval of the procased Tentative Parcel Flap as 'sitowrt on x , " &" B. Parcel Size: 8.053 acres C. Existing Zoning: Parks D. Surrounding land Use: North - Vacant South - Vacant j East - Residentiei Condominiums + West - Vacant E. Surrounding General Plan and Development rode Designations. North - School - South Office Park East Medium high Density Residential West - Medium Density Residential ITr"!�1 I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENT PARCEL MAP 11287 - LEWIS HOMES SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 PAGE 2 ti z F. Site fharacter$stics: The fi°te has been graded as a retention basin within the Terra Vista. Master Plan of Drainage System. II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this Parcel Map is to create the tot on which 15 ► ss on Park will be developed. Community Services has verified that the boundaries correspond to those of the park design. Tentative Tract 13717. to the west, was approved earlier this year. she conditions of approval require the completion of Church Street between Spruce and Elm Avenues and the trail connection between La Mission Park and the Nest Greenway Corridor. III. ENVIPANMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial 5tudFy-.--Staff conducted a field investigation and completed. Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate, IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Nearing have been sent to surrounding property owners end placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Posting at the site has also bee« completed. I V. RECONKROATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider I all input —affirelements of the Tentative Parcel Map 11287,. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would �.' be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson '! Senior Civil Engineer SRH:BM: jh I.ttachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit W) Tentative Map (Exhibit "B ") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval TENIAT T- 13717 ., .r EQOTH[6L CITY OF nML. PAieUL MAP //&&7 MG. 0 D VN m RESOLUTION NO. AMk A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING. COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO -CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TERTATIVE PARCEL, MAP NUMBER 31287, LOCATED AT THE NORI%iNEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND ELM AVENUE, AND MAKING, FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077 - 421 -41 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 11287, submitted by Lewis :Comes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 1 parcel, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APP: 1077- 421 -41, located at the northwest corner of Chu.reh Street and Elm Avenue„ and WHEREAS, on September 26, 1990, the Planning Commission held a duly ad; :;--;;ssed pupil is hearing ft,-. the above - described `map. NOW, THEREFORE, tHE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLORS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is pkvsically suitable for the propuserl development.' 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been rev ei r_ed a- FTconsidered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970; and further, this Commission hereby izsues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map. Number 11287 is hereby approved subject to-75F—attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: ondit ons• 1. Construct Church Street full width from Spruce Avenue to Elm Avenue. Off -site parkway improvements can be deferred until development of the adjacent properties. PLANNIF3 COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT PARCEL MAP 11287 LEWIS HOMES SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 PAGE 2 2. Cons. uct Master Plan Storrs Drain line 1 f am Deer Creek Channe"t to the p ject site. 3. Constru t Master Plan Storm Drain li s 2 -1 and 2 -2 within Church Street a d Elm Avenue adjacent to the roject site. 4. Construct a Community Trail al g the east property line of the school si between Elm Avenue and hest Greenway Park and the extension of torm drain line 2 within the trail. 5. Construct the erim3eter between the park site and Tentative Tract 13717.yr 6. iinstruct a bus b on t north side of Church Street west of Elm Avenue to the satis actio of the City Traffic Engineer. APP,`p.JVEI) AND ADOPTED THIS 2 H DAY OF ZiPTCMBER, 1990. PLANNINe, COMMISSION OF THE CI 0 tANCHO CUCAMONGA AY: arry T. Me ei—r,— an �► AIICJ9' Brad Buller, S a rotary \vhi 1, Brad Buller, Secr' ry of the PIstning ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, da hereby cer�ify that the f Resolution was duly and regularly introduced passed, and adopted Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc n9a, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of eptember, 1990, by the following vote- toywit: AYES; COM+fISS19NERS: NOES COMMISSIONERV ABSENT: COYMISSIONERS•. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT, "ARCEL MAP 11287 - LEWIS HOMES SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 PAGE 2 2. Construct Master Plan Storm Drain line 1 from Deer Creek Channel to the project site. ti 3. Construct Master Plan Storm Drain lines 2 -1 and 2 -2 within Church Str ,jet and Elm Avenue adjacent to the project site. 4. Construct the - Community Trail along the =ast property line of the school site between Elm Avenue aivt West Greenway Park and the extensfgq of storm drain line 2 -2 witl ;t the trail. S. Construct the perimeter ?t Rlretaiin wall, between the park site and Tentative Tract 13717, .per -the a;,ved plans'`far ihe'fientiaifivd Tract, 6. Construct a bus bay on the north side of Church Street west of Elm Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• JLarry T, Mc —Ni el Choirm—an- ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning;Commiss�on held on the 26th day of September, 1990, by the following vole -to -wit: AYES, COMMISSIONERS: NOES COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: f, .. � .r 0 g 3 �yy Q a �Z V � oho Y � 4 Ll ��� OyY.0 M^ L� MO •.i' riY t • �� C� OIL YO qq M i Pli 4 it w°. O • O y9 �� M4. 7 iY� ;O•Z r �. �� ��+� lr Y i r _yy all g�gx •i �• s�Y� i ctrl 4 .�. 6: T il S �� �r�� NY. � ►! AMY N�V ��a �� ■� =� Y1 r w Q1 r rw pp�� ti at t v7C raa 3 .Nis a 21 all 9 rq Y 1 1ri a v0 Yg i I. US 27 .i3►�' �ssS WM �w0 t•T1� ow .r " a + Y qY• + y V 9g �g V y+r + a V y w g uiKi «� o 6 Y iWO M•M u1 -1 u � ! w GN aZ. a Y T c�• kx= S un o +ay i ` 4Y $ e i_ x T ° 88 °k . o ° °.o gfi$ w wr Y 13 r 0 SZ;; Ow p t f YV it- Y > Ali s M� Y.p t-. ra Z ""I O :8 < P o a oa LL p�y O. w 2=2 0 Y .cY Y YY- t4y_' a1r wCY tM A C N xMp a et _� _ aP �aa o� q NYL pp e •[.C• OY.t CC ISO CC �[i Mpp Y uy '.lJ 1.0 " a + Y qY• + y V 9g �g V y+r + a V y w g uiKi «� o 6 Y iWO M•M u1 -1 u � ! w OM a Y T c�• kx= i ` 4Y $ e w x T ° 88 °k Ell o ° °.o gfi$ Ow p t f YV it- Y > Ali s M� Y.p t-. I ""I O :8 < P o a L t N m n W OC ti on vas a Y T C, i ` 4Y $ L ° 88 °k Y > s M� �ppu + N A Y N m n W OC ti on —'-- -� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 26, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner By: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: EIJVIRON14ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN M7ENbt 40 »O2 - CITY OF RANCHO CU GA CAMON • A request to .T amend the density provisions of the Victoria Community Plan to regl!ire changes in land (se designations to be approved by City Council. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND T €RRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AM NOMENT 90 -01 - CITY OF RAQ:CHO CUCAMON - A request to amend the density provisions of the Terra Vista Community Plan t�- require changes in land use designations to be approved by City Council.. I. _ANALYSIS' A. Background: One of the unique elements of both the Victoria and Terra Vista Community Plans is the flexibility built into the overall development of the Planned Community areas. Political, economic:, or marketing conditions may arise that suggest rearrangeoent of the rand use designations. The community plans allow a trading of residential densities in one planning area for densities in another piannitg area provided the flexibility of the densities is found to be consistent with the goals intent s Community Currently, an y proposal change the land use designation a planning area requires review and approval through the Development /Design Review process rather than the usual District Amendment (Zone Change) public hearing procedure. B. Generals Over the last several months, much con,ern has ;.entered around the mix of single family and mul i »family residential uses that currently exist and the mix the: can he ant'cipated at build "'It of the City. As a result, staff has been directed to prepare an amendment to the community plans to require any redesignation of land use densities to be reviewed and approved by the City Council. This dues not preclude any developer from requesting a change in the land use designation... it simply provides an additional level of review, and public input for any proposal requesting such an increase in density. T'1`FSi J & K PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VCPA 90 -02 & TVCPA 90 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 2 It is staff's recommendation that any current proposals being ,. reviewed by staff or the "''fanning Commission be considered under the current planned community requirements. Any J requests to redesignate a land use density submitted after the J effective date of the Ordinance would be subject to the new provisions. C. Environmental Assessment: !W %tier having completed the environmental Checklist, staff has determined that the proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on the environment. Theref ,)re, staff �scommends that the Planning Commissios issue a Negative Declaration for each amendment. IL FACTS FOR FINDINGS- The amendments will provide for the development of comprehensively planna:� '-°rban communities tha* are superior to the development utherw se ailgxable under alternative regulatiods. The amendt.snts will provide for development of the planned communities in a manner consistent with the General Plan and which relates to element and growth managemene'policies of the City. The amencWtents will provide for the construction, im-3rovement, and extension of transportation faciliti6s, public utilities, and public services required within the planne. communities. I,rt addition, the amendments will not be detrimental Am to the public health or _afety or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts: III. CORRESPONDENCE: These items have been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper as public hearings. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends teat the Planning Commission recommend approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 90 -02 and Terra Vista. Community Plan Amc,�inent 90 -01 and +.commend issuance of Negativ' Declarations by the City Council L«rough adoption of the attached Resolutions. Re f y sub ' ted, Brad --� City PI tner BB :SM :ml g Attachments Exhibit "A" - Excerpt from Victoria Community Plan Exhibit "B" - Excerpt from Terra Vista Community Plan Resolution Recommending Appr.val of Victoria Commun + *.y Pl;ln Amendment 90 -02 ANIL Reso`ution Recommending Approval of Terra Vista CorMnunity Plan Amendment 90 -01 r=LVISIUTY IN MANAGING THS,PLAN :n the future, conditions may arise that suggest rera^rangements in the Land Use Plan designations for izd.vidual sub - planning areas as shown or. the Land Use ?!an and the Density Vist_:5ution Plan. The Cc:amunity Plan is dmsi;ned to provide flexibility i:z trading the residential densities in one sub - planning area for densities is other sub- clanninq areas. to be developed in the future. `:e Cc=unrty Plan mint also accommodate change caused by political, eConomie, or Market ZOnditiOns, without detrimentally a4aec:ing the ability to construct the total Optimum Yield A roach Victoria community. By utilizing the y p Can f in determining residential, densities, such = 1Axibilit c occur within the design intent of this Camasunity Plan without Changing the character and quality of each Village, or the total number of units deasi ,nated for the Cc=unity plan Xc ea. mach village can accommodate some change by incre:asiag cc decreasing the number of residential dwelling units in that Vil -age without altering the intent of this plan. Accordingly ► -the optIa= Yield Approach al,Zws a landowner, wi hin certain limitations, to redesignate the Land CS0 plan designations far sue- planning areas he owns. in other words, a landowner may increase the number of dwelling units in one sub-olanning area if he decreases► tie number of dwelling units in another sub - planning area he owns as long as he maintains the total number C4. dwelling units assigned by the Ggnsity Distribution 'plans to his+ property. Additionally, density can be transaferred frog one landowner to another by mutual agreement, provided thsb other requirements set gorth in this section are stet. To provide flexibility which main' "Ins the integrity of the Community plan and which promotes the goags and, desires of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the following guidelines shall apply to the transfer of density within the Community plan Area. 1. he member of dwelling units proposed on the ^ =sits Distribution Plan may ba increased for any sub- planning arena. Sowev4r, such increases should nr�t alter tae intent of this plan to provide a variety 4t residential housing types and densities throughout each Village and the entire COMMunity Plan Arena. Additionally, the number of units proposed for any subplanning area nay he decreased without a aorrresgondirg increase in another subpiaanning Axsao fx 0 r UCAMONGA P ION Ti LE- + ,mt4�1v amg= EXMrr A -i SCALE- 2. The Land use Plan designation for any sub- planning area may be redesignated as follows: a. "L" Land Use designations can be redesignated to '', "LM" land use designations for any sub - planning area. b. cLM" land use designations cci be redesignated to either a "M" or "ME" land use designation for any sub- planning area. c. "M• land use designations _ can be redesignated to "ME" land use designations for any sub - planning area. d. "M" land use designations can-be redesignated to "E" lend use designations.for any sub - planning areao 3. In order to provide flexibility in the development of the Victoria planned Community over the 10>15 year life of the Plan, a maximum of 20% variation in the optimum yield may be allowable. Any and all variation: shall be reviewed and aproved by the Design Review Commtittee. T e variation in a num —umber of dv- :ding units within one "Ulage may require corresponding decreases in one or more of the ot�ier villages to insure that the total number of units do not exceed 825S within the Planned Cosmmunity, boundary. la ITEM: v�o.A 10 ANIL MY OF : , UCAMONG TULE: ta642W✓,4 AY.4v r vrs PLANT ION -4 EXfII M.4 -2 SCALE: C o°1 °11 aemdO— ) L- 4) 1 m °3 u)'OLwLd0tn cc+ry ) uw 0CSoUMJ3= o'-OEmcad cda�7m— w6)ui• -• -m CE Cm moo-- ,C"�i- p 10 =d > intrC�� pCL tn.L.d0 pc '''C mC w.0 ipy �.C1 >C•N�mCr 7o MC'O ++LC r.+�.�y XC"� E d ` °c 4- v; � m � 'a •- ul F � o. +o � o ai (0 6mi c c 7 C e m. U .- N 6) s V L w C 0 6) L O ro (D.- V N° C M I- 'L9 C. w 6) w •- y,, O .0 m L N 6) O 61 +.� w u) - C 7 •`-^.0 m c. (n tn c ° 7 V A L 6i ul N E 7 ro m N m Cw E". L. Q Q. 3 O H', C1L 761 C. C)1C N °am+ ° 7— O dd . v�eLi6C) =CL 1.Fo LNO c o•+ycCtE;i,,o L �OCCa,iD1m� o1.OGV�'CCr� '� =�E_ mm�Ero.7m'Gd (yr AroA V m0d�r ^°' (p_w' =Q a3.� —jai yCC°a(o..�:L(n«'C+ •'} L 6) :: - •� U V 3 L (y0 N° y V 'N .fd`' C a 6) st °` m C C se Ha'3di�+= xcmmc°7Ecau.� `mc«,� �y «61omm� m 1 CL G„ N O o1.- O 0 L :c C i c M> I- _'° C i..; •- a a G w m V -. =. �. w .- a .- L— E N� C Z N O d V) y C L N m:Y C mw V C Aw 6)='.7 0'6) l 01C a) 4- M y c u 41 N• N. w O C.- t'Cn. O d :s ,� a . w L CL '° L �± 'O ur 'u) ° •C 3 C'O w •a L, «. w w L M. v L a. 6ci A C Q.., _ :c • G a 'in „C,, " a k d m mi a XC m. 6)t C «'LCC°Ot'V1pLLE7361CUt >yC(p6)�L LL! N E tat C o �,� — «.Q) C C .0 6 C sATos ct m� Co E ° Cm E d o maroro— a CA•- 6)t 3 m— - 6) y y— E Lgl`9�uC- oE�C3.0 7CJ)38w(n a 7y CO6NmLL0 A C s- 0 a1 c >�`'cwyd'�E�«: =abicy�c To�Eoo°�;a�mawCc 6) - N d C7 0 O E o 61 m L 0 0 00 N Y O O > 6) d G C e+ a CL m CL N m N 'O V .0 C V= w ro E L1. k° cu = .r L Q. (p M o °. w w E L O ° Cl Z w • Y 6) 6) m 6) • d A 6) + 1 N 'a w A m to ? CS 61 61 tmJ T7 V r _w ,Q L C O w . N. m r N ass+ m C E« 4- •C '° .,, .- d L ° m m o OV w m° u m m© 3i. a ro">.•c� a m = C > ' ro as E= c) ,4 (a ,. c+ Ci u, E E t9t = 7 3 .C' ) u) d 3 ro w y 67 7 t w N eo. d '8 O 6) .- w to .� '^' mL mcmL «Owo 10 as.,pOj '�C °rCm> o'0XEd c c «`R m `6 H c tm +. c E m° v o L " v xU C t0 v Cd �vi6cicS r=.0 003: ow «�u0 L. 0—C Amw mmv of>`E•° ro61C 4, .vY %- VyiOu.7E U) 4) mQ1 3 >Edcn��• VQUa� us -c6 U)�ioro .so -°C o v u°i,aea t LL�e+?73 72c >o�,we >c urceeLLCn �T 7 (`o ®.M o " C� W� `0« a °w c c on m d�� m c� VCE�L�tOJ� >O6)Cc ,� Cio"..70)n/_ya`a (°' . CLG7A >+ 3 °= c u1`• yt� °'E C d r y C °.fly 2 L 0 E ~tro a0 7NN yC 6)` Cd So> th N7 •OM'Cw X81 O'`��L`C6uiy «:'ate aVa���E(Wi1Eo LW °c°A'sc+ «d_ 6r°C.Y - o «mL�,E c C >oa67C �.. 'd. �° ro~ E. C B >. �'C ro dia 0`i ".a 81 t o C c o V m a E= L. (cp 0 C L a 9 Y C �+. 3 7 w C Qw °' 6) O a ca cm do «tar�6,(°e. Aae L „ti ,� (c o>> ul Qa� y e us«_, d a C*' c `� IA �:-° u d Ea �.+N? t °aro as C ., E m H E cati9 �L�BinCa� c7i " ` 7c>o"°�n°C��aci'dt > em0 -- Lo C a ��®to Lum u4)w �' E y L` `C Cado+<'tm 0 CA;) m y ro m w..6) � ° T+ E u N o d CM L L a O � C 6) C 6) O N 6) V w 6) u °' 6) C 6) 61 w V C ro y t�0 0 ='^:+u u . c'ro61 CM-5 6ci._up1 70o-t I-c ° C (aMaZ 'dCeG`o���u saa>i`�cn^ L caEimdoo0 �° si C5 U. C C•C U > 0- � w � L « 3 v1 16- F um Cum too m F c m 0 M CLt- > 'o 0 1 1- c i a) a 'a 0,06 W S� 3 o0 0 0 '�p C a E 10.w 0.L X m; : N ?� N at'a 0 N m?- o� c M y L d N 0 d C N= ✓ O 'a .0 •e c C. �y- a,o>�3"a e 3u1ria�¢aC61c G 3. o cci3ir to >3 c E y,� CL f°EC'yc3 m o- y H N «d a L O L N 0 O C 2 •� y E . o L C L L C. m 4 0 �° o s..-'v°v o.0c� .Ovi N N d f m M m 31 L L L L V V U V tn N C N O b to N a+ r 0)3 01° 3I y N_m ° a —N vj C 0 0 ai Z _ v L J O 5« « 2 0 •a" -a(Dw NC)m ( L0>.CN I m 4) c I - -yd:,1 h y O O L a) O al .p �' U .c - m L =.- N � L O as 7 7 N ©- y E .N >.4, ; 7✓ J1 03yL� —a om 'U'o � cy N. D 0.10ORN�. ..S•3Os.ON ©N °O3ga -0w, a:.c N�LON -C.r UZ o•w- 0^'�4- c�.°O''C.w yN =C. a6 -r -3�q X00 mc�(n 0LO:x61.- �3N a,CC I�t1+Li AO Va 1 OLcn =a aa)md) C L.0 «� c° 9° a E v.. a s yr to y y -_ c+� y L c w3CC cmyN`6y «aL3 ~� m ~3yr- ��N 0 e-O+ a). 0�. +�..' N.,o '0 0 �Z7 '•' C m >.� L L- 1011 a n m a «$ p N d E R mil: cca °s d0. 3'o oia y C- �sr o ,� a m EL N- m U ul a Q. � co 0 67 V) •� 0 �a aGr�tyjlC��'C NoC+o V �d -01>D�O� O+O+U «�Y mLc N C. N+�+rte, m 00 L Qai q Mr_�.L« C3 OS •Lq O.0 CfCa «10 E� �' L`�� �4- C:� C C w-2 ci m C •«E, th y 0'E s0. +�« C! y. =.. yw C d0 U a) c L 7y NL+ = O Nom«'~ �.. ro o� o°rC v aGi m o C U=° ° u i Im(7 F- M- 0 o 0.0 m 106 o¢ to M . n.« Q.Q mG o CLC ow M O N a0+ E ECL oa' > c Nom. N s0 CC1aC L - O L L C. m C 0+T9 C E E No mErnC L � C «y wOU1 'fp at mV ° o 0 0 d al C " y 4Y tn Cam' 04-.0 m O ° ro �+ •> N Ul CL o0 rGmu al .m+ c .a=d) @L C L N C w— y«+OOL.N G to L t- G.�'m N N ro mm f-7 Qy. 0 N y n e, a: >- - v E c-� L. y L y �-- occc.L�. m.= a r� m(D04C30c 41 NayO.nyL tcirU UQam° 0w0.;;� °a' M Q a- CL— y. m L OC U lCpUm�7Na,��Y3 Md� e+ CL to �m Cca)emc u0 ornM -Y.� m o � c•�p..'- d- c.. �•L° c c rL0O U i+Y3 Q'>. E.0 V m c C 0: 401 t0. S L N « N Q V J J? O om'o fl = L db �, ° 0 y 4 r GMC'1eN ° O �s �a>ir04 CO to s m= .tl S '4 lejo H v N C-0 i N O d .c R y �+o:e R R W IV :6 yLj +,`R C R G�+� RC3y 07 M N 0) L._ W R to Qf •+ >' vC C c a. as ,� ar OC Da E "c...� O V c >C m O o V N... - O VNi..O - N 'O ,g y $ '~ m i � . L) CL =.. fl- e. ° � . R Q- L ,F y. C E1�•d w 9 0•N Nf dLO0 4+ m S. E > Z dL 04 Rt, a .. °�.Q LU A 4) m`lS0 4. a };wRCO,i�''y%.. aTN41 d > .� d 6L7 > - Ci N t�7f f0 s 41 y `_ °r Q A R L C N L >. G1 O �. ?+ � -0 y{ 'y Of L ,.�. ' '- $ y E R L U R.C'.' to d v *,.a O `� d Nate+ 3 L = LLI d ���3 «tu to M � s m .'� . C.�� boy C �EdL�- ��NU, & cc g°R,cw mEmt -0 to Ny co L O.O:07....N,�O. d M Pt .3 R 4} L ,C V> R �+ .dPLZi+Q7 > E :E A .N '�° C. C .6 S 41 lOON r,�'+a. C b O y �+ N ul Oi. 61'G QI Gl N GNU 5' t iR «O.0 arsj X L7. a M a+N R R rC *'Epp). dw01r+O ih C yyi aE yp toGm �'E�d1: ��.ER gA 0. c ,E 'CfR yw 'C �ac.Me��COpm tn �O��te'�p°'c� ,S acgR.0 m� U) 'ti c a) .0 A C C- 0 O C��> O g a.�CJ � o) 'C R Q L .a .� -CF -d C X� E.6! E� y W 7'C L..0.� -� CN C 01 _ G7y�C�O���� ; 'LS 9.. C L '➢1 ip } 07wN�'Ey�'CE:f- 4f �N V R '� O7 Q . U 81 O gCBt > ?+ E .N u.0 �N . ,Ny G GlN L t4�' >.e� ? O Lw > C C N Q,E'II'Dh C8.�3"C Q O CQE = O.wVS 7 r'.0 G a 3 t�4'Ci C. ly4 > .N m R: �w CIA fC7 0. y 0. R «i i Q 9 U O to V > _ C� R ID 'p d! O N gn �6 .CtJ1 �+ C d- S •� ®N O C L N .. ]. Ac CL m c 0i s i E'a' r V CL G 4 s r-R �� _ 1 MIAW *-d/ RESOLUTION'NO. A.RESOLU.TION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION � RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COM14UNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 90 -02, A REQUEST TO AMEAD THE DENSITY PROVISIONS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN TO 1EQUIRE CHANGES IN LAND USE DESIUNATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL, AND MAKING ONDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has '-.nitiated an "application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 9D -02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Community Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On September 20 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 26, 1990, including written and oral str�f reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The Amendment pertains to all residential property within the Victoria Planned Community; and (b) The Amendment provides for an additional level of review consistent with the intent of the General Plan and Section 65856 of the California Government Code. 3. - Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this` Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and Ripon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragrahs l and 2 above., this Commissiorf hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VCPA 90 -02 CITY OF RWHO CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 2 (a) That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and (b) That the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth manage;aent policies of the City; and (c) That the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development with the District. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that -the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. i 5. Bases upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 19 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: (a) That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Govermzient Code, that the Planning Coramission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends swproval on the 26th day of September, 1990, . Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 90 -02. (b) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 90 -02, as attached in Exhibit "A." (c) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby -adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwardeJ to the City Council. 6. The Secretary of this Comoission shall certify the adoption -of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNie], Chairman i ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary Ct `� �- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VCPA 90 -02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 3 c I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ' Cucamonga, do, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly an- regularly introduced. pissed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of September 1990, by the following vote -to -wit: k AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONEt qP EXHIBIT "A" The Victoria Community Plan, page 197, item number 3, shall be modified e to read as follows: 3. In order to provide flexibility in the development of the Victoria Planned Community oiler the I0-15 year life of the Plate, a maximum of COX variation in the optimum yield may be allowed. Any and all variations shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council The variation in the number of dwelling units within one village Aft E r 1 RESOLUTION NO. A.RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 90 -01, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DENSITY PROVISIONS OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN TO REQUIRE CHANGES IN LAND USE DESIeNATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) Thp City of Rancho Cucamonga has initiated rn`�aMplicatiou for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment No. 90 -01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Community Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On September 26, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) Ail legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, -it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public t ,aring on September 26, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically firws as folluws; (a) The Amendment pertains- to all residential property within the Terra Vista Planned Co=unity; and (b) The Amendment provides for s additional level of review consistent with the intent of the General Plan and Section- 65856 of the California Government Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragrahs l and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO. TVCPA 90 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 2 1 (a) That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and (b) That the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner consistent with the General Plaq and with related development and growth management policies of the City; an4 (c) That the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportaFion facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development eith the District. 4. This Commission. hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and concl usions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: (a) That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends appraval l�n the 26th day of September, 1990, Terra Vista Community Plan (amendment No. r, L. (b) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment No. 90 -01, as attached in Exhibit "A." (c) That a Certified. Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning ommiscon shall be forwarded to the City Council. 6. The Secretary of this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.R BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary Y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. a ' TVSPA 90 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 3 .ate I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planninq Commission of the Cif,y of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of.the Planning Commission 'held on the 26th day of Septemter 1990, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: W..INISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Ir �UHISIT "A" /64t The Aerra Vista Plan, page VI -7, -*114 corn, shall be-. modified to read as folloris: "LM" land use designations can be redesignated to "M" land use. "M" land use designations can be redesignated to "LM" or "MH" land use. "MH" land use designations can be redesignated to "M" or "'I" land use. Modifications of this nature shall be reviewed and Approved by the Design Review Coanitte�, Planning Commission, and City Council. The provision of afforda ;Ae housing is an important goal of Iii 1 a EXHIBIT "A" The Terra Vista Community Plan, page VI -7, left column, shall be-, modified to read as-follows: "!.M land use designations can be redesignated to "M° land use. "M" land use designations can be redesignated to "LM" or "MH° land use. _ "MH" land use designations can be, =- edesignated to "M" or NO land use. "H" land use designations can be redesignated to "MH" land use. Modifications of this nature shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review C� aittee, Planning =.omission, and City Council. The provision of affordable housing is an important goal of 1 1 _I fr DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: I. 1W "CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Septembijr 26, 1990 Chairmao and Members of the Planning Commission; Brad Buller, City Planner Beverly Nisen9 Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL_ ASSESSMENT VAWIANCE 90 -08 BROCK A request to reduce the minimum net average lot size: from 22,500 to 12,162 square feet and to reduce the minimum lot depth of Lot 1 fr(m 150 to 120 feet for a 40 lot subdivision on 25.9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential - District (less than 2 dwelling units; per acre), located east of Haven Avenue and north of n'ingstem Drive - APN: 0201 - 121 -24. belated File: Tentative Tract 14771. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14771 - BROCK - A residential subdivision of 40 single family lo�:s on 25.9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwellirg units per acre) located east of Haven Avenue and north of Ringstem Drive - APN: 0201- 121 -24. Related file: Variance 90 -08. ABSTRACT: This is a combined report involving a Tract Map and a Variance application. After discussion of both items, the Commission should first cct on the Variance. Shou j the Variance be denied, minor modifications to the 'Tract Map would be required. If the Variance is approved, the Map can be approved as - proposed. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: 1. Approval of a Variance, 2. Approval of the Subdivision Map, and Conceptual Grading Plan, and :s. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Pro3ect Density: 1.58 dwelling units per acre. iML &M j PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 90 -08 & TT 14771 - BROCK SEPTEMBER 26, 1990;' Page 2 C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - `L.A. Bureau of Power and Light Easement; vacant land within the County - South - Single Family Residential; Very Lou Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East - V4cant; Flood Control West - Single Family Residential; Very tow Residential. (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations Project Site - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) North - Flood Control /Utility Corridor South - Very Low Residential (less than 2 Nelling units per. acre) East - flood Control /Utility Corridor West - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling unit;; per acre) E, Site Characteristics: The pr,,ject site is currently vacant with slopes ranging from 5 -15 percent. A man -made levee for flood control purposes is located along the southern side of the site, north of Ringstem Drive and Tackstem Street. The site is bordered on the north by a Los Angeles Bureau of Power and Light easement, on the east by Flood Control District lard, and on the south and west by Tract 12332 -2 (Haven View Estt.`es) which is partially constricted. F. Background: Tracts 12332 and 12332 -2 are located to the south and west of this tract and consist of 204 '.tits, ranging in size from 2Q,000 to 44,,000 square feet. Both phases of Tract 12332 were approved with private streets. Haven View Estates is a gate- guarded community developed with custom and semi - custom homes. The proposed project is located on a remainder parcel within this gated community. Reference to this remainder parcel is made in a recorded document titled "Developer Street Easement and Maintenance Agreement." This document grants. the remainder parcel access for ingress /egress over the existing streets connecting to Haven Avenue and through the gates. I1. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant-is proposing a 40 lot subdivision, with tots ranging in size from 20,069 to 31,498 square feet. The a\?erage lot size is 22,162 - square feet. The applicant is also regciesting a variance to reduce the minimum average lot size from 22,300 to 22,162 square feet, and to reduce the minimum lot depth on Lot No. 1 from 150 to 120 feet. e PLANNIWG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 90 -08 & TT 14771 - BROCK SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Pe ,fie 3 The site contains natural grades from 10 -15 percent and thus falls within the area required to comply with the Hillside Grading Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to utilize a sloping pad concept,which is intended to minimize grading as much as possible. This is consistent with the existing, grading concept within Haven View Estates. Prototypical lot grading and layout schemes have been submitted which indicate that split _level foundations will be provided. B. Trails Advisory Committee: The Committee re.*iewed the project on July 1P -1990 and did not approve it in its original configuratio. which had the community trail located along the sauth tract boundary. The Committee had the following comments on the trail layout: I. A 20 -foot community trail snould be continued along the north edge of the tract abutting Lot "A ". 2. A 15 -foot local feeder trail should be s<<`stituted for the community trait at the east side of Lot 5. 3. A local feeder trail should continue along the east side' of Tackstem Street to the north side of Ringstem Drive. 4. The local 'feeder trail should match the existing adjacent j tract feeder trail and conti u_ along the north side of, Ringstem Drive from the east side of Tackstem Street to the easterly tract boundary. Check the width of existing local trail easements. 5 North /south local trails should be provided at the rear of the lots between "A" Court and "B" Court, between "€." Court and Paddock Drive, and along the interior side of the easterly tract boundary. - All of these local trails would connect the l,)cal trail along Ringstem Drive with the community trail along the northern tract boundary. 6. The community trail at the north edge of the tract should have a garden wall on the south side of the 12 -foot service road and the standard tshite PVC fence on the south side of tine community trails adjacent to the lots. The applicant revised the plans in order to meet all the above criteria except for #3 noted above. The applicant feels that this portion of the trail is unnecessary and would like this matter discussed, by the full Commission." } 4 q—y)l 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 90 -08 & TT 14771 - BROCk SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 4 C. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted on August 13, 1990, regarding the project. The residents _ voiced concern mainly with the five lots which front onto' Tackstem Street. They feel it would be dangerous to h&ve; cars backing _.t onto this street and they also noted that in only two cases in Tract 12832 do lots front onto Ringstem or Tackstem. The applica -at indicated that' they would be agreeable to a condition which provided some type of mitigation measure such as hammerhead or circular_ driveways. Concern was also expressed by residents regarding traffic impacts with the additional 40 lots. They feel that the traffic impact would be too great cnd that a second, fully improved access to the east should be provided, rather than the emergency_ access indicated. Exhibit "A" provides notes from the meeting and the list of attendees. A second Neighborhood Meeting was conducted on September 4, 1990. Concern_ regarding the lots which front onto Tackstem Drive was reiterated. It was felt that this will encourage on- street parking, which is prohibited by the Covenants, - Conditions, and Restrictions (CC &Rs) within the existing subdivision. Additional concerns regarding the,need., for -a variance for minimum average lot size was express?d by the residents. Residents also indicated that they did nr` want any garage dogs facing Tackstem or Ringstem and 'that the number of fronton garages should be limited to 25 percent. At the September 4, 1990, meting the developer provided a traffic study to answer some of the residents concerns,. The ultimate traffic volume, including Tracts 12332, 14771, and potential future deveropmept of 53 additional lots within the Flood Control District property to the east, was calculated to be 3,110 daily trips on Ringstem Drive and 590 daily trips on Tackstem Street. City policy considers streets to be - functioning as collectors once they carry 1,500 trips a day. Therefore, lots should not front onto Ringstem Drive. According to Traffic Engineering, the maximum volume which can be accommodated on two -lane road (28 feet wide, excluding parking) is 10,000 daily trips. Staff met with the applicant again on September 14, 1990, at which time the applicant• presented three.different scenarios which would .limit the front -on lots on Tackstem'Street:.(see Exhibit "C "). The first alternative provided a private driveway in front of lots 1 -5, with ord y,one access point onto Tackstem. The second alternative provided a private driveway to the rear of Lots 1.5, with no access onto Tackstem. The third alternative provided a' `modified PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 90 -08 & TT 14771 - BRQCkv SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 5 cul -de -sac off of Tackstem Street. None of the three alternatives were acceptable to Planning or Engineering staff for reasons of non- comformity with existing City standards. D. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Melcher, Weinberger, Coleman ) reviewed the project on August 16, 1990, and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. Lots 1 -5 should be provided with either hammerhead or, circular driveways to preclude vehicles backing out onto Tackstem Street. This shotild be depicted on any future Design Review_ submittals or single family plan checks. This stipulation should also be cuatained in the CC &Rs. 2, This Submittal should conform to all provisions of the Hillside Development Ordinance (Section 17.24 of the Development Code). 3. Split level pads, stem wall's, and varying floor levels should be incorporated on any future Design Review and single family plan check submittals in order to minimize grading, E. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Commi tee reviewed and accepted the proposal on August 14, ',:10, subject to the additional conditions listed in the attached Resolution of Approval. F. Grading Committee: The Grading: Committea reviewed the proposal on August 13, 1990, and, approved it on August 28, 1990. III. VARIANCE: The applicant is requesting two variances in conjunction, with the proposed,' subdivision of Tentative Tract 14771. The first request is to allow the overall net average lot size of the -tract to be reduces! from 22,500 'square feet, as_ required by code, to 22,162 square feet. The applicant feels that achieving the required net average lot size would be difficult because of the requirement of a drainage channel along the north tract boundary. With the requirement of the drainage channel, 1.73 acres of buildable land has beets lost. Without the channel requirements a 24,186 square foot average lot size could be achieved. The site was originalfiy designed with a v- ditch to carry storm flaws along Vie northerly property boundary, which would be consistent with the existing adjacent Tract 12332 -2. .�., -5 f .a V N g�PF ��K ail has ISS �0 1 , 6R it9 tr therl`J 1NG e' commur a nor iy0ry 9 FR 26 h o th pdv acres 1up k, 8 199 t\\at t stem 'Grails •58 acr s a ,� n0teae Ofa0{ the ntaineg5 acres of a9 6 aPPI orth s� datio trail cain ?a •naA �0y the the hrecomme of the c0ntadditio pad,t'0e oca ed { o� ��al d YQ�� a 1 a�90 ar depth ea beea t boend the wh,9e sh has resu he mtnt ria' u eeds lot ti itte tton, 'Chj area4 duce t i5 a t �h e*c page o dedtea 1a �'��8 b1e t is t0 repot Iee• , �h� mOm ave dedica es of re4ues {c,et• are red R' to •2' acr V artaO e t to I? is d t e reQut Oo i tha+; the S secov, 150 stains Si -Le an plannin9uires l of 1 {rthat cum lot r the GOde re4 01 . ;el mtoim der JOT cement tv reQ,,ired Tn °r0evel0 04 eP;rdifficuthe Si =e FiNDiN �ce+ them..de� at ;On cttca Wtth FpR Vartanmust be interPrlt in p \Si Ste °t FpG�S ve the adid� iteral la rasa inco cey or ZV • anPr owing ,ct or tion '60 itaraywiP c ytant� the at theified re9UPhyyilo eft Gone• ordinap9v �vea ly 09 t0 1 • ,he Spec" 0{ ytrne beve nab or a p� opert �ot�9ereral iea tj r . ectives ey�cev to the that d t, SPeci dled e there aaPPli�he P "Overt, distrt0 n of .4 Al eses end 2 - �� pdt a 8 'aset.eyttn the ya� i 1terP�ica�t a PT istr'ct• Part tithe proPect °r ld vrae�tteSaP� the s not �eslimitatto S of NA 3• �� 9ula ery of °th r °{ the V on us t,, same d, t ietdetr u ;4u to by °� a 9raotii� 1e9e5,lied in v►i,-\ n a ly ink 4• to at pecr Pic ieS cla{ the V�; {are° ;c n tY• the 6010,71 On other P pant' P �-, or n - the Tract Ma + the fhat h alth,or mfr °vem ientat'a.1%9 al e,a�; i9att o 5• the epties the {in Gener added �ealth rse Prop approve {oli0win9 its th th the ablic Save and Sep to aRe the tent w ct, wt to the p{icant d use of In xd is m Ss c °o Jhe pro �mehta, q'r St en Pp °P° \a tionS 5 Of is a ShOu jhe Qrotelt Goaen °t be { arceaditioeco enacab, e PP °v iO xx aevel r s+ Wi,l ca °s its• 1n, the be app measu ar 1 impa er wit e ,4tth t raS' Ufr sal ;ranmenta to9et� mPli a fit Sta�aa env plan+ re in de an site vat + are to de Dplja PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 90 -08 b TT 14771 - BPOCK SEPTEASER 26, 1990 Page 7 V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Environmental v Che.:klist and foun��_no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate if the tentative tract is approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: Both items have been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper as a Public Hearing, the site has it been posted, and tnoti.;es have been sent to all property ,'owners within 300 feet of fire site. In addition, the Haven View } Homeowner's Association has been notified. VIT_. RECOMMENDATION: Staff 'recommends that the Planning Commission conduct the public hearing to receive all input on the proposed Variance and Tentative Tract Map. If after considering all testimony, the Planning Commission can support the required "indings, hen adoption of the attached Resolutions 'would be ap prim If �6he Planning Commissfn cannot support the aria ce minor mcdificatlons to the Tentative Map.will be nece a y R spectf ubmit , Brad ul er City PI nner BB :DN.mig Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Neighborhood Meeting Notes from August 13, 1990, aad List of Attendees Exhibit "B" - List of Attendees at Neighborhood Meeting of September 4, 1990. Exhibit "C" - Alteriative Lot Lay -outs - Exhibit "0" - S;te Utilization` Map Exhibit "E" - .Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "F" - Site Plan Exhibit "G" Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "H" Conceptual Grading.Plan Exhibit "I" - Letter from Applicant (Variance Justification) Exhibit 'J" - Lot 1 Rasolutiotr, of Approval for Variance 90 -08 Resolution of Approval with Conditions for Tentative tract 14771 DATE: August 13, 1990 TO: Dan Co ,man, Principal Planner FROM: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14771 (BROCK) Attendees:. Beverly Hissen, City of Rancho Cucamonga Steve Shepard, Brack Homes Trent Pulliam, Brock Homes Phil Douglas, Associated Engineers Kathleen Hill, Associated Engineers A short introduction to the project was presented by Steve Shepard of Brock Homes. After this, questions were i:i:,ken from the audience. - Following is a summary of their concerns: 1. Residents were concerned with the width of Tackstem Street. They noted that no parking was currently permitted on the existing portion of Tackstem: The engineer indicated that the road width would remain the same to be consistent with the existing project (Tract 12332 -2). 2. Residents were concerned with the placement of the W ses on the lots. It was indicated to them that the house placement was conceptual only. 3. Concern was expressed regarding whe five lots which front onto Tackstem. They felt it would be dangerous to have cars backing out unto Tackstem due to the curve of the street. They also_ noted that the existing tract does not )'lave any lots which front onto Tackstem. Trent Pulliam (Brock Homes) indicated that they would be willing to provide mitigation measures such as signage, hammerhead driveways, or circular drivewa_ ° -. Pulliam also indicated that all preliminary layouts is remainder parcel showed lots fronting onto Tackstem. ono residents, however, were still uncomfortable with front -ons along Tackstem. 4. Concern was also expressed by residents regarding traffic impacts with an additional 40 lots. They 'Felt that the traffic impact would be too great and that a second, fully improved, access to the east should be provided, rather than the emergency access indicated. Yr'1 B tIf I E5 IT a MEETING MINUTES FOR TT 14771 August 13.. 1990 Page 2 S. Some residents were concerned with the size and price range of the hr,res that will be built on the proposed lots. It was explained that homes are not being proposed at this time. Representa'ives from JCC Development indicated L'tat their houses would he in the range of 5.70 -- 5,800 square feet. Brock indicated' that any proposed houses would proL bly be comparable to this. 6. Several residents were concerned with any new lots being provided access through their gate and private streets. They felt this would lessen their property values and they wouldn't have nought ,their lots if they knew there was going to be additional lots in the area, cc: Betty biller, Engineering BN /jfs i i c _ l I i l477/ Al h aW Al Al v je'VOC4 "1,44gairc SMIA o.n�•. ►C'� get °o�1�. qjrjax �ttii ' �.bsSrfa4�d� Cr' 4�i - ?33 ,C,�Mc1E �� ✓au0 rCwM�'ii �� rJ.l�l:2' zs,C�%�t�° Vii^' 'c'�.�caP� • �`p -°��� xw %W4 �O.. W77?f Q ✓ �- li�S-aW V�b Iv 7t'is� L�/ 4��-►E S aE `AR.v C azv' -1 �38o seK�� t t�r�. Gjk$ ti SS' e-k-. loo m: t A J. hiAdj. �} 1 Viet . 2Y'7 At I I 4I 3I u� � � I s8 ; y J T j J )- q. rn -1 LQ 7 U .v 13 N y � h v V cVwi `gg� w ww 4 u I' r- r / 7 : lei 1. J %4k L y J T j J )- q. rn -1 LQ 7 U ► , 0 I I�o � N � cola a�b � •�� � h N J --y if '�A IC'7� -! :, � ; ��•• � 'tee . :i J M i i s trs v� �i r. � Q p p, NO ~ U Q �Q Z., . N �; Y !1 s R I J � h , •T °°,"11t °�j AOL .oiT .Si UN ' 4! ISIS WI I l .a 'a tl � �oq� Q @ O ® © ®•® O G� Ca O p. h% ® `` \. ' ._�.. i i• AVW Al a / ® ® ®p fi ZO P WOO rrl C., ME - 14i71 Alm . -UCAMONGA TrME PLANNINU DW SM EXHIBIT: _ scAi _ `J y Ai a f i IL s . 1- A / p / D t � E aJ a � CE F-; X R `A �y Now rd �C4 1 AOL n . r �� n► Yil - I •1 AARE . C NORTH CITY OF rrEM: T-T al e uerre.er�a:�area,anc rAyjG4 - L..FS�.q.. —.M— — y.— ;__,s- ��M•— iF— •�-- •— �tr --M. —A .b .p.n.s. .A.— .#. --.fi. � �� -� • .� \\y 7i f i �rp •{j � /• sue .` of J � f. iif � 1L� 1e fcb . �Ar. .. •ff � 1.�..� n . r �� n► Yil - I •1 AARE . C NORTH CITY OF rrEM: T-T al e y. }� �� ._� .�._�.. �. ru.+s Whit tli�- �..� .� � �7.i�...e_.��• . � � ` ° f u •, as ac �. ��r - \- - • '` �a sr` as ° ° as 'r as o: { I Ni'H CITY CF ITEIM: RANCHO CUCkNDNCA TITLF- CDO P .AI'-JNM DW SM EXHIW.- -SCALE.- I'l] NORTH 1-11 1i RANCID CLUATNUNGA PLAMING DIVEM MIST, -3 SCALE- �% _ � 'a 1 Variance Justifications for Tentative Tract 14771 Variance A) To allow the overall net lot average of Tract 14771 to be 22,162 square feet where 22,500 square feet is required, a reduction of 338 square feet (,q.45 square feet per lot). The subject property contains 25.35 gross acres of land. A total of 40 lots, with a minimum area of 20,088 square feet, are proposed. The net acreage of the site is 20.35 (less from gross acreage, 2.32 acres for streets, .95 acres for rho community trail and 1.73 acres for the* drainage c%eannel) for an overall average lot size of 22,162 square feet. Achieving a net average lot size of 22,500 square feet on thin sits is difficult due to the drainage channel improvements that have become a requirement of this tract. The channel is 34 fact aide and extends the entire length of the sits. Without the channel improvements, the site would contain 22.21 net acres and a 24,166 square foot lot average could be obtained. ' The site was origindlly designed with a V -Ditch to carry storm flows along the northerly property line. This, design was to be consistent with the design of Tract 12332 -2. Because the concrete drainage channel is now a requirement of this tract, '.73 acres of buildable acreage is lost. The requirement of a drainage channal along the northern boundary of this sit* is an exceptional circumstance and is not consistent with the design of other. properties In the aroa. Additionally, tha9 Tract has been redesigned to allow for the 20 foot wide community trail to parallel the drainage channel along the northern boundary. The trail contains .95 acres in this configuration. ho previous design with the trail extending along the southerly Tract. 'boundary within the right -o£ -way and extending north througa the site r.ontained .68 acres. Tb's redasigti resulted in a .27 acre loss of buildable c:rea. The requestsd variance to allow an overall lot average of 22,162 square feet is less them a two percent (20) reduction from the required 22,500 square foot lot average. The proposed average doe3 not compromise the character of the surrounding developments. All lots are ovar 20,000 square fast and several lots greatly exceed the airdsum. T.ts site is In conformance with the General flan and generally meats etl -other requirements of the Devrlopnsnt Coda, As designed the sit* :r safes and Ohl functional and will be eumplidentary to the other dsvolor, xinte in the araa.. x14 lbi'r "INZ -n% -Z� (Variancb B) To allow the minimum lot depth on Lot 1 of Tentative Tract 14771 to be 120 feet where 150 feet, an measured from the midpoint of the lot, is required. tot 1 is an irregularly shaped lot that contains 25,178 square feet. As proposed the depth at the midpoint i,�f the lot is 124 feet due to its xpie shaped" configuration. if the triangular area of thin lot was to }-a a&" into a separate comaan open space lot, lot 1 would most the minimum depth requirement without reducing the 'lot area to leas than 20,000 squar:s feet, By .maintaining the lot in the proposed configuration, a lai:ger more dtuirabies lot is created rind the area can be maintained by the bomeowner. Additionally, to aasura appropriate development of rt.is lot a condition stating thy► setbacks and location {I and hefeat for fencing can be placed in tbx CC&C +a for this lot. Ef E The overall design of the tract is consistent with the Cenoral Plan snd I Lot 1 as proposed will be it keapiug with the ebaractsr of the 4 developing neig;hboncoad. — L.A. DEPT. OF - Ua"T AN* POWER J4AM 'It COW' ! r- 10 CrrY OF rrEm, ---!rr tA RANCHO CUCANKMA mu,--Ld KAMING DIVEM amom. T' SCAM Ea LA 1E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY AF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AP ^ROVING VARIANCE NO. 90 -08 R REQUEST TO REDUCE THE MIN!AUM NET AVERAGE LOT SIZE FROM 22,500 TO 22,162 SQUARE FEET AND TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM LOT DEPTH OF LOT 1 FROM 1550 TO 120 FEET FOR A 40 LOT SUBDIVISION ON 25.9 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE AND NORTH OF RINGSTEM DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0201 - 121 -24. A. Recital s. (i) Brock Kones has filed any application for the issuance: of a Vzriance No, 90 -08 as described in the title of this Resolution4 Hereitlafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 25th of September 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Cmnmission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced pubic hearing on September 26, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Tackstem Street ancr Ringstem Drive with a street frontage of 1,020 feet along Tackstem Street and 1,360 feet along Ringstem and: is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a Las Angeles Department of Power and Light easement, the property to the south of that site consists of single family residential under construction, the property to the east is vacant flood control land, and the property to the west is single Family residential under construction; and f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VARIANCE 90 -08 - BROCK HOMES SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 2 (c) The reduction of the minimum lo*. depth From 150 to 320 square feet is due to the irregularly shaped nature of the lot. (d)- The reduction of the minimum average lot size from 22,500 to 22,162 square feet is due to the requirenent of an extensive drainage channel along the north trac± boundary,: (e) The request will not create an inconsistency with the surrounding approved tract and will not be out of character with it. 3. Based upon the substantial evideni:e presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public t:I,.ring and upon the specific fin.Aings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Q = ssion hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal interpretation anO enforcemerk of the specified regulations would re3ult in practical difficulte or annecezary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the beveio -pment Code. (b) That there are exceptional or ext- aordinary circ:uastances or conditions applicable 1.0 the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties In the same district. (c) T it strict o- 11teral interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant oe *privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the Limitations on other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the gran -ing of _ne Variance wfil of be detrimental tq the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or i„provemerts in the vicinity. _ 4. This Commission hereby fins and certifies that the project has beer. reviewed and considered in complia,,tce with the Califoonia Environmental Qual ;ty Act of 19'0 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Ba; d upon the findings and conciusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 1 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every conditioi set F5rth below. 1) All applicable renditions of Tentative Tract 14771 shall apply. 6. The Sec-.,etary to t0s Commission shell certify :;o the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Mo. YARTIACE 90 -08 - BROCK H014M SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 ?age 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTEE THIS 2ST1{ DAY OF SEPTCR PLANNING COmMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. BY: Larr , mcNie , Chan an ATTEST: Brad Buller, See; ,tarty 1, Brad Butler, Secretary of ,:he Planning Comfssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fore9jing Resolution was 4uly and regularly introduced,. passed, and adopted by the Panning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a rrguiar meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26tis day of September, 11q90, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSXONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0701-02 -o 09--26 -90 PC Agenda o 5 'of 6 - - U 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA; APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP K0. 1477;, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 40 SINGLE 'FAMILY LOTS 00 25.9 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE AND NORTH OF RINGSTEM DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 0201- 121 -24. A. Recitals. (i) Brock Homes has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14771 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th rT September 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequi,Ites prior to the odoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hareby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission he,,eby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on September 26, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Tackstem Street and Ringstem Drive with a street frontage of 1,020 feet along Tackstem Street and 1,360 feet along Ringstem and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a Los Angeles Department of Pewer and Light.easerent, the property to the south of that site consists of single family residential under construction, the property to the Rast is vacant tTood control land, and the property to the west is single family residential under construction; and (c) The ,project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minirum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. TT 14771 - BROCK HOMES SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 2 L�J (d) The proposal is in compliance with the Master Pla» of Ttu.4s and the o'jectives of the Equestrian Overlay District; and (e) The development of 40 single Family lots on 25.9 acres of land is consistent with the Very Low Residerti4l, Lana use designation of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above.-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs ., and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract s consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable inj4ry to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and Ank (e' The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; sand (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access. through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the ptloject has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs, 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below aA in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: 1) A 20 -foot community trail shall be continued along the rR ,)rth edge of the tract abutting Lot "A ". 21 P. 15 -foot local feeder trail- shall be substituted for the c,omaunity trail at the east side of Lot 5, Aftk ^ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. ` TT 14771 - BROCK HOMES i SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 3 JP 3) A local feeder trail shall continue along the east side of Tacksteri Street to the north side of Ringstem Drive. N 4) The local feeder trail shall match the existing adjacent tract feeder trait and continue along the north side of Ringstem Dri - from the east side of Tackstem Street to the easterly tract boundary. I�I I 5) North /south local trails shall be provided at the rear of the lots between "Ar, Court and "B" Court, between "B" court and Paddock Drive, and along the interior side of the easterly tract 4- boundary. All of these local trails would connect the local trail along Ringstem Drive with the community ;rail along the northern tract boundary. 6) The community trail at the north edge of the tract shall have a garden wall on the south side of.,the 12 -font service road and the standard white PVC fence on the south side of the community trail adjacent to the lots, l 3) Lots 1 -5 shall be provided with either hammerhead or circular driveways to preclude vehicles backing out onto Tackstem Street. TI shall be depicted on any suture Design Review submittals or single family plan checks. This stipulation shall also be contained in the CC &Rs. 8) This submittal shall conform to all provisions of the Hillside Development Ordinance (Section 13.24 of the Development Ccde). 9) Split level pads, stem walls., and varying floor lavel= shall be incorporated an any future Design Review and single family plan check submittals in orc+e- to minimize grading. I 10) Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide in conjunction with applicable school district for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any sc6aool district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into t►,e territory of such existing district prior to the recordation of the final map or the -issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, further, if the affected school district has not formed.a. Mello -Roos Community Facilities District within twelve J months of the date of approval of the project and prior to the { recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14771 - BROCK HOMES SEPTEMBER 26 1990 Page 4 11) the developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the potential Fourth Street Rock Crusher project i'ri a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a deposit on any property. 12) When future design review submittals or single family plan checks are submitted,, no garage doors shall facl, Ringstem "or Tackstem. I•,) The number of front -on garages within ,this tract ` shall be limited to 25 percent total. 14. The front yard setback shall be noted on the final map for Lot 1. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection nistrict: 1) The project shall comply with the provisions of the Fire Safety Overlay District. Engineering Division: 1) Construct a permanent tr:pezoidal channel along the north tract boundary, adjacent to tfi� Los Angeles Department of L �t and Power easement, from the' end of the existing levee to rer��in north of the tract to the east tract boundary. The Chan "'1 shall be privately maintained by .a Homeowners Association. The channel design shall be justified by a Yinal drainage study, approved by the City'E.9ineer, to include the following: j a) Provide a continuous seal between the off -site drainage protection for Tracts 12332 (north prnperty line wall) and 14771 and a. means for flows from the existing Community Trail s.,31e north of tract 12332 to enter the channel north of Tract 14t1l; b) Fencing on the upstream '(north) side shall aglow debris passage; c) The masonry wall between the service road and the adjacent Community Trail may incorporate 1.5 feet of the 2.5 feet of required freeboard if designed as a floodwall; and d) Provide a 12- foot -wide service road on the downstream (south) side of the channel with two means of access, one from "C" Court and one across the Community Trail to Tackstem Street. Access to the service road shall be restricted to maintenance personnel only. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION �0. TT W71 - BROCK HOMES SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page '5 2) Drainage protection facilities extending from the east tra;t boundary to Deer Creek Channel shall be designed to the satisfaction of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. 3) It shall be the Developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone AO designation removed from the project area. The Developer's Engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, hydrologic /hydraulic calculations, etc. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to approval of the record map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A letter of ;lap Revision (LOMR) shall be issued prior to .occupancy or impr(,vement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 4) The final drainage study shall also address the need for any storm drainage facilities on site. If required, such facilities shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5) Const,-uct an Interior Community Trail south of and parallel to the channel service road. j 6) Walls adjacent to the emmunity Trail right - of-way shall be maintained by the Hcmeowners' A::sociation. 7) The temporary cul -de -sac at the end of "C" Court shall include both curb radii and i stub for future extension. 8) Provide sidewalk on the east side of Paddock Drive. 9) Residential intersections shall' have their noticeability improved, by moving the 2 : closest trees on each side away from the street and placed in a tree easement. 10) Provide an irrevocable offer to dedicate to the City all street rights -of -way, street tree easements, and drainage easements for drainage facilities which drain the streets. ii) Driveways on Lots 15 and 26 shall be located as -Far from the adjacent intersection as possible to minimize potentia'.$ conflict° with traffic turning right off of Ringstem Drive, 12) Reconstruct the emergency access road to align with "Cu Court rather than Ringstem Drive. The emergency access route shall remain functional at all times per Fire District requirements. 13) The existing Flood Control District permit allowing use of the Deer Creek Channel access road and bridge for emergency access to Tract 12332 -2 shall be amended to reflect the revised alignment. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14771 - 6ROCK HOMES SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 6 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ?6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE rITY OF RANCHO =CUCARONGA BY: .airy T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the - foregoing Resolution was .duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at ,`regular meeting Rf the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of September 1990, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COKIISSIONERS; NOES,: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: g P. �SMto HIM b $Y �Y Y ^C'Y� �¢¢, Mile! b Yaow. ^l>21. �6 _ y �� A s �py L ■ � � LY I w=�M {. ,� ��`+Cj 1 0 � � « Oa�Y..i g� �. yiy D y9l� dO eO y NC smOm 6{f � p +PG i�� = ➢s,'y' a.LO p ~ °e`sYC���YYY, Y��Ybo. eei�. o���.�o. C b0 ^r�L O:N}Pg++ C a'Oan G$G$G$ pp 7 Cp Y yN�! Cy�Cy b 4 o� Y - 0 o N Y O ^ c PO a A^ 11«Aa= BID 3b ^ ^y�O�tbM •�ft^�!v_lrgY q0 IGOOM���y OLOYb� `"`���OOOY `NCC ^91B °YO MC ~gyYY NCB. �.. MwS%'.wY` puma $ = a�9Li�! b > t M CN�O TIL an-0010, IM! %!;1 till 24 — ..4 ym■$q..{{.. U-111423- tl sO Y u r .,1 r PD P1 O YI m � Y - 6N r tip =A Cl Y10M�0Y�C y S O 4 Y Y �Sb�a�a 5 8�$YY uyO 99 10� Gq�S pMp 6.6p goa � L s Y C 6. J =3 31 9 Y 4s; Y �q Zq-s OtMd OA 14.50 °qi' tip 8i� $iqg�g�s'�'gqQR" +�OW d6�P Oy 'O +Y »� F'NKN aliz— zj its 12 '�aA �^ »P� & va ��S Y6^ad ^� tr.tl Y$r �M B y Ot• I rNea Q zu MMM c° yss ��.pIMA! TL �z�&Lg U 'Zia 9 ~tl.JM¢ 9a Ow °n s3� a DES's r ad�lf �ri 5.1 a� _ s 'v 1 1 1 to C ril O�s LfOL� t��: it, P i �: °`�retr Cal oar b leya �� 3 sp° p M Y ^SD E � .1 �YY Y —2 S q ° 1 ed t P oi . P YYM �V Mr °a a 8 :21 w itls ®� �8 '° a ��P3� a v � i 1b,_ to Ii I Bil P Ait ss :da ' y� �� Op S M s Y� Ss N tg d ]jai =ae 14 s »y °yii� iMH VII ai�db _Y tl Q�Ma POyI � M 2 y Yd»H5 r\ Fu tul >i I Let raj -3S ag °SS~ fig z ` u ° 5 »� � g',2H Y ° Y� M M tb » N Y ° 117.1 N a9 ax11`4tr' I I IA t N LA ® gy fl�` Q qA gY�, ��Oi. pq3 ymaaL C Qr` Y ■OiL �••Y� S. tl «� Ov wYO.."gi w•- . ^i.'y�LG °r3 �'$ C�p O y _ aVY C 8 nq., y'q {Y. O•� u0 yp0 W w�pO® Y�Yyr + 9�aq® C�� M �• �� °�� µ, Yyq{i� _�wN ppLpp c y.� sqy •�' iQ� .yNw ,�y, LqN� ctlL�Y A �dMw�� wi OMB+ � rwwN wy. wC ��Y NV ;.�Y �%��iqN p' Y•+rY Nu L Y �P aL r '! Yw` ps'aY Y1�1�Vy q ^�C ` �N O i= q q+I 0 sM 6 �y 4f w° tl tl N n M ,6 a q3 `.1 iiai q Q M 4Q"g9QC ~ 6 p I ��p �uB Mgy6 y ~Y eil y�•j O.iii j:'1: Y«ppp sr� ��w �.V Nitt/ by��..��C �� .0i IS y�l.l `�i MN .6.N V,N r ®yV�mNws ^ry s.0 IS rC�a C�¢G9n��M.Y p.� M.��� � V7 G °ewG dµ(L�i`j0'I SG .c i.4 LP_CN+ �.a G -18 w~ .�j Nt• Cb; Np'gp. y�'y w ,a Yq 4q Yps°. l Or 9w � O y° b) YOI w µ L Lby w (. 4] i r f1Yi • �y O °Y L 6p Nr Yj�/O!( °yM Of @wa C 1OipMG L Yr16 °� ®.9f ®p � � Y. eO .4E i. J n•�Q� vM rlf1.6aLlr Nw MGM l FEai .pie o^ • riC p 'a7 . ja ;s� g•''� Z v as L fits U . 5 �« a 34 M w i = �tl 0« Y L q tl' ki q <g b' TL gE s ea3 � t Ng -54 m Y b O O X30 $o lit W: 022 -tl$;� La Zwz ��'$.6 ®' g w ��e �'. $�yC. `�x• �.p� bl y.�s r�� +�". a e�s+P ®.ff. . r °si °ads :sSN'i <ov.r3 s `air •ur 'su s.� �wN�a q a <UL wt',si'..49 w •� w ti m v lei m u .: ai M =� ji v Ot y is g 4 V vu. 8 -2 gig;,y�@@ Vf wqy � G d ,x Cj=- O V aOrO� Yn li Nyp ®� LN Cy�Z . =. CZ- It i —I V ^> ;Y~ Oc�i sQee �y�S ±6 N CCY� 6Yri�• ��r`l N D w C 4 Q� �a Y _► 6Vp �M ~t�yi pCLq !O✓ � LM� �LV NOYi Lft444.0� aLg Fc �' 3i 'at �mTi csC+ �a+�3 ►�' ewt� .aG.� $M9�u NLr wM S#42%Vqq 9~ �•'C.i V y� gip'p u L ewe sa w «gcyU�YJp p�� D v � o +. svasD r1DY, $tl 'QAQV J ✓�VY +tl Uzi b`rU U�MaV41�+�i. 'awl 9 pv lu s �oc 2 4M �eYra�w� yY� ®mil yti mail .� C Vpo •.� y p yy1� lr \i 3 S M al N sit! ' Y • 0 + r e� �■t:� -��Q Has Ur: 02-1 Iry Iaer _ ]+i�`A +1► N 4! 9 !d! E ism �ps`pti apo� 3�.� le•A rn C f �. L v I tl;a N N `Y b 16 �8 A N Ai 41 di M ♦ ♦. y M M • N N i' m $ a.�• =29 4 y csC+ �a+�3 ►�' ewt� .aG.� $M9�u NLr wM S#42%Vqq 9~ �•'C.i V y� gip'p u L ewe sa w «gcyU�YJp p�� D v � o +. svasD r1DY, $tl 'QAQV J ✓�VY +tl Uzi b`rU U�MaV41�+�i. 'awl 9 pv lu .1 �1 I >1 W � ^ + s �oc Z v R ~ �eYra�w� yY� Y yti mail .� C Vpo •.� y p yy1� lr \i 3 S M al N sit! ' Y • 0 + Y �u e� �■t:� -��Q s !U -Ys 02-1 Iry Iaer Ja• ]+i�`A +1► N 4! 9 !d! .1 �1 I >1 W � ^ + E 0 �oc �tl yY� Y yti .� C Vpo •.� y p yy1� lr \i 3 S M al N sit! ' Y Ar Y 0 NNN. M r0 o 'd l�Vr Al yYggy!! C V-1 E ism �ps`pti apo� 3�.� y� rn C IV A E 0 �I x r w R wL a 04$5 w '« ra : S YaP.:N, L q !1iy • =jj M C v uy �~5. nom. Mia b�u �y Y11 tls1�pA L~4f j � S u «yy!! �AOO A — -*—.% L +{L� `VMM �4 g NA �. VtlNp M 1 g iL� m��' `.2 e 6 3Na V a`N x V 6LR� yS 1 N tlg i V+ �p -M Zvi a p~ b �may Y C7 N C ` M Yp Mpp Ha Yo `ir M� Y P LS. paw{ i. p F vi OZ N •'r w �tC V s.� w1Y yy6�M RMZ I+ o � Is a� L !y L S V L 75 �a N .A r,r a p4 �p r3 gm y$ a wv+a �a ,'San d8 _�a sass a asp �t@ y 1r M1 ���6 �q3 4w ti a �«6 r•+r sg � M ibV os go F Eli m va 2 H1 afill —3 «3 Po_ . (2; + z w �..j� �1L yO .. E E �• C� u�• c A i G rise Ss�� Z _ r �a ffi C H sits L e�e�� yc gLw sr• "C &E � a 5 M W G lid L 4 3Q =rld 1;e 3 � �Y•$� gE'rg$ .� L 3 ee X3 Iz er � eaw y e Q° lilt] ,: € &S s 5p »_ wEc �� 3 E� >y�� 4 ✓V d E r5s = � `WOp &: s�s��rF� $ g� �r �. CC� e� 1 g g{��°5 °�• �o« � it �'�E�g ° E 22 24 �_�► a y d 6Y. Y• V Y v— fti L�Lt cA. Y 6 C Y V A= L M V t am$s� wb t - su« Wd «E 3Y ,i� to a � Y CCQ Y • W SY ifd 4 V X �YYt E L a 6 � O • L� p d Y t t ®G W 7 w� Y S o yY g" a! fat .a I 3 r $- — M 4 aa y�fM ty u a E •� N L. CN O YOy O O � C ue a NCC� d y = d 4 r " yyd r Y Ga w N' I X1 'oy�v eys �Od Eo 45$g 6r ByNg 3� u .� o• +sC� L � VM� fepM wi r �I r �1L yO OH E L b ~1 Y M A G rise Ll r �a a�Q' e�e�� teF_ • "C &E a 5 M W � �rl 11 11 h r �a v W E sk Lid O y O� Y g21 �g �o a 6w aL Yr C9 Y CO L i� r O �s� eft kw > sY �ts� •VYZ V - Y=] r L b SS o ou$ M L • d V > Y Y b J dp +T wY C wk� iA k �w e e � �a ku s Cie g$o $�► a v O Y Y� r Vr� Y _qy� $ ®is A e•�i^ �S js �d wY� i.Y sb ws b k all a M q V s j Y L r L Y Is s ^ �L1= 3 e w b Y J � q= N ills i+w Yp M Vw b� Y Say V d M a 3tcu. ^6 bow as ILt q Sk�q i 71, ��. L� L � '• �•I �I�f ~I ^( NI e•�i^ �S js �d wY� i.Y �yM qZ q V s j Y L r L Y �L1= •6i�^ V.Y J ••33 M i M q= N ills i+w Yp M Vw b� Y as �� V d M a 3tcu. ^6 bow as ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 90 -01 - SHERWOOD - A request to amend the Development Districts Map from "FC" Flood Control to "L" Low Residential (2,4 dwelling units per acre) for 1.92 acres contained within, two parcels of land 'located north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue, adjacent to the east side of the Cucamonga Creek C'rannel. The Planning Commission will also consider "OS" Open Space and "VL" Very Low (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) as possible land use alternatives - APN: 201- 200 -37 and 1062 - 540- -57 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a General Plan Amendment and C7erelopment District Amendment and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonina: North - Vs ;ant, Flood Control "F.C" South Vacant, Flood Control "FC" and future freeway East - Existing single family dwellings, Low Residential "L" ( 2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant, Flood Control "FC" in Upland ITMN &0 (WrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT i DATE: September 25, 3990 T0: Chairr,an and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Vince Bertonis Assistan« Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90 -03A - SHERWOOD - A r *.quest to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Flood Control /Utility Corridor to Law Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) for 1.42 acres contained within two parcels of land located north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue, adjacent to the east side of the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The Planning Commission will also consider Open Space and Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) as possible land use 4 alternatives - APN: 261 - X200 -37 and 1062 - 640 -57 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 90 -01 - SHERWOOD - A request to amend the Development Districts Map from "FC" Flood Control to "L" Low Residential (2,4 dwelling units per acre) for 1.92 acres contained within, two parcels of land 'located north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue, adjacent to the east side of the Cucamonga Creek C'rannel. The Planning Commission will also consider "OS" Open Space and "VL" Very Low (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) as possible land use alternatives - APN: 201- 200 -37 and 1062 - 540- -57 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a General Plan Amendment and C7erelopment District Amendment and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonina: North - Vs ;ant, Flood Control "F.C" South Vacant, Flood Control "FC" and future freeway East - Existing single family dwellings, Low Residential "L" ( 2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant, Flood Control "FC" in Upland ITMN &0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 90 -01A & DDA 90 -01 - SHERWOOD September 26, 1990 Page Z C. General Plan Designations: v Project Site - Flood Control /Utility Corridor North - Flood Control /Utility Corridor South - Flood Control /Utility Corridor and.-Future freeway East - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Flood Control /Utility Corridor in Upiand D. Site Characteristics: The site slopes approximately 5 percent to the south and is covered sparsely with native alluvial fan shrubs. No endangered plF -it or wildlife is known to inhabit the site. Portions of the old flood control 1_vees extend along the sides of the parcels which bnrdar ;he remaining Flood Control District land. The two parcels on the east side of the channel are at higher elevations than the adjoining residential lots. II. LAND USE ANALYSIS: A. Backgra n-1 The prope,2y has been zoned Flood Control since the City adopted its General Plan and Develop,tent Code in 1983. At the tune, the property was needed for flood control purposes. The ;'••. conga Creek Channel has beer improved ay the San Bernardino County Flood Control District; therefore, a Affik quitclaim deed was recorded on September '25, 1989. The land is currently_ located in a Flood Zane "B." Because of these changes, it is staff's opinion that the Flood Control land use designation is no longer appropriate. Staff has contacted 'he Flood Control District and they have no objection to any of the Tana uses being proposed. The application originally included a parcel on the west side of the flood control channel. Since the initial submittal, the applicant has moved that parcel from consideration under this application. Therefore, this report will address the { land use issues for the renain`ng two parcels on the eazt side - of the channel. In addition, there is no current proposal to subdivide the lane. The Community Services Departmeit has indicated that the property is not an appropriate location for a p ;.rk. B. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on September 12, 1390, to discuss the proposal with the neighbors on Carol Avenue and Paridot Avenue. During the meeting, the neighbors expressed concern about a change from flood control, where no dwelling units are allowed under Developmert Code Standards, to single family residential. The neighbor° were most concerned about a loss of privacy because of the lot configurations Tnd pad elevations. The subject parcels have a pad elevation which is at least 5 feet higher than existing homes and would abut the rear yards of the `6es at0__2 V v PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RUuRT GPA 90 -OIA & DDA 90 -01 - SHERWOOD September 26, 1990 Page along Carol Avenue and Peridot Avenue. The neighbors indicated that if they were to suppa.rt a land use change to single family residential, it should not allow further subdivision of the two parcels so that the loss of privacy is not increased. Another major issue was the keeping of hirses. The existing homes are net allowed to keep horses because the lots do not meet the 4inim�tm of 20,000 square feet needed to maintain horses in low Residential District. The neighbors did not want the two parcels in question to be allowed to have horses kept there because they were not allowed the same rights. The neighbors were also concerned about the maintenance of the existing Metropolitan ' .4atev District property which separates the two properties because that is where any proposed homes would have to take vehicular access. C. Proposed Low. Residential Designation: The applicant has requested a land use designation of Low Residential. This is the designation of Ue existing single family' homes to the east and would allow for a zoning which is consistent with the neighborhood. The two parcels in question total 1.92 acres, which under Low Residential development standards, could allow for each parcel to be further subdivided into two parcel.. D. Alternative Designations: To provide the Commission with alternatives to the existing and proposed designations, staff has included an analysis of categories similar in character to those under discussion. For this purpose-, staff analyzed the following land use categories: 1. 00 en Space "W l An Open Space land use designation would not allow for the development of sipgle family homes on the subject parcels but iaould permit a variety of agricultural uses. A maximum density of one home per 40 acres is allowed under this designation. The significant difference between Open Space and Flood Control is that Open Space allows for the development of structures whereas Flood Control does not. 2. Very Low Residential "vL ": This designation would allow for the development of one to two single family homes per acre with a minimum lot size of 22,503 square feet. The southern lot' could- not be subu:vided under this designation, however, the northern one couli potentially be parceled into two lots. the applicant indicated to staff at ``e neighborhood meeting a willingness to accept any of the pt.:posed alternate land use i that would allow for single family residential 3evelopment. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT f GPA 31-OIA & DDA 90.01. - SHERWOOD September 26, 1990 Page 4 E. Conclusions: A.'_ reviewing the applicant's proposal and the alternate land use designations, staff recommends adoption of the Very Low Residential land use fbr the following reasons: 1. Although Low Residential would be consistent with the adjacent Cavelopment, in staff's view it is not the most appropriate land use. The homes to the east were developed with the expectation that the flood control property would remain as that use. Therefore, the two properties are irregularly shaped uhlich would make any Furth.-- subdividing of the property difficult to conform with curresct City design standards. 2. The Open Space designation preserves the concept-s of limited development, but due to insufficient area of these parcels, single family development wound not be authorized. 3. The Very Low designation would allow for the development of at least one single family home on each par;;el which is the stated intention of the applicant. The applicant has provided conceptual site plans which indicate that single family structures could be developed in conformance wit''n Very Lori standards. Further, the Very Low designation would limit the keeping of horses to three on the smaller parcel and four on the larger parcel, whereas Flood Control and Oaen Space designations do not provide limitations on the keeping of large animals. 4. If the parcels are not used for residential purposes, then a variety or" agricultural uses would be permitted. III. GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CGDE CO3'IFORMANCE: State law requires the Development Code to tie consistent with the General Plan;. therefore, if findings can be made -to warrant the General Plan Amendment, then similar findings must also be made regarding the Development District Amendment, The subject parcels conform with Low Residentia3, Very Low Residential, and Open space property development standards, IV. ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT: Staff -has reviewed the Initial Study, ;�::rt I and completed —tile Environmental Checklist, Part 1I of the Initial Study and has found that no significant adverse environmental impacts will occur as a result of the propcsed General plan Amendment and Development District Amendment. V. FACTS FOR FINDIRGS: Rased on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the Following findings raaarding this application: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 90 -01A b DDA 90 -01- SHERIAODD September 26, 1990 Page b Amok 1. The property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use and development district designation in N terms of access and size as evidenced by the site's ability to conform to the City's development standards for single family residential uses; and 2. The proposed amendments would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the General Plan and Development Code due to the site's capacl't; to promote the goals and objectives for residential development. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: These items have been advertised as a Pblic hearing in the Inland Valley Daiiv Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted with Supplemental Notification signs, and notices were sent. to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VII. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 90 -OIA and Development District Amendment 90 -01 for the amendment of the land use designation from Flood Control to Very tow Residential through the adoption of the attached Resolutions. Respectfully submitted, i Brad 8 Ter City Planner BB:VB /jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Site'Plan Exhibit *Cn - General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment Maps Exhibit "D" - Open Space District Uses Resolution Recommending Approval for General Plan Amendment 90 -01A Resolution Recommending Approval for Development District Amendment 90 -01 1 VERY Ict \ \\ DU /AC DELV DST: VL Wily Lom 5dT1Sy MV. DMT. c VL �� � 11tY ��rtsurefie � 1 ALTA BOTH SMMT MWLAW NE CM Dist: ,��Q. !SClIiT � 6011 f�E1�ITW. �.d STATE ROUTE 30 Ar i a - Of1L TAR �R FSOE21f1 mv est. a ` ' ITEM: GPA 90.OIA I DDA 96-01 CITY OF UCAMONGA P ION TITLE: �iCINFi`Y MAP � EXHIBIT- ° "' SCALE: NONE Iq E lu Nw-o-q T .vYn 14.16 -M USE REGULA77ONS FOR OPEN SPACE 11MWCTS { US DM=CP 1 OS PC UC 1. Single Family dwellings (not to exceed an P — average density of I wilt per 40 acres) 2. Caretaker quarters } a. permanent P P P b. Whnporary C C C 3. Home Occupations P — — 4. Accessory structures such as detached garages, carports, cabanas, guest house, barns, storage sheds, corrals. a. Related to on -site single family P dwe_Ung b. Not related to on -site dwelling P — 5. Agricultural Uses a. Row crops, trucic gardens P P P b. Plant storage or propagation P P P a. Orchards, vineyards, Christmas and other tree farms P P P d. Community gardens P P P e. Greenhouses P P P f. Livestock grazing, breeding (no teed lots) P P P g. Hydropode culture P P P h. On -site sales of products grown an s'r P P P 6. Cemeteries, C"matories, Mausoleums, Columtseriums and Related Uses C — — rip 7. Wildlife Preserves and Sanctuaries P P P 8. Forest Maintanaces FaelUtlea/Rawre Station P P P 0. Racreationt Us" a. Parka, piaUc areas, playgrounds P P P b. Hlking, WWM, equestrian trails. P P P c. Greenways P P P d. Golf cow-ses e. Riding schools (equestrian) C C C f. Commsrclal stables C C C C. Country club and related was C C C 10. Preservation and use of Histoeie - Landmaia and related urn such as museums, art galleries and foot services to accommodate on -Ate use& C C C Ll. Flood control structures and facilities P P P 14. Light vehicle parking and storage in areas substantially surrounded by industrial uses. C C 13. and Utility structures) a tions (related egedpmsnt C C C TMM, GPA 90-OIA / DDA 90.01 ITY OF UCAMONOA TrME: "OS" DISTRICT USES P • ixw� ION EXHIBIT. "D" SCALE: ND14E �.,_ AM RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90 -01A TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM FLOOD CONTROLJUTILITY CORRIDOR TO VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR TWO PARCELS CONSISTING OF 1,92 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED r! NORTH AND SOUTH OF AN EXTENSION OF HIGHLAND AVENUE ADJACENT TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FIND14GS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 201- 200 -37 AND 1062 - 640 -57 KI A. Recitals. (i) Bob Sherwood, on behalf of Leslie Sherwood Barnes, has, filed an appM:ation for General Plan Amendment No. 90 -01A as described in the title of stn?s Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the si''c;ect General Plan Atseaament is referred to as "the application." (ii) On September 26, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a dilly noticed public hearing on the application,. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of.the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. - 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public Geptember 26, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to approximately 1.92 acres of land, basically a narrow linear configuration, located in two parcels north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue on the east side of the: Cucamonga Creek Channel and is presently undeveloped. Said prop_rties are currently' designated as Flood Control /Utility Corridor, and H vo c� PLANNING COMMISSON RESOLUTION NO. GPA 90 -OIA - SHERWOOD Septembe" 26, 1990 Page 2 (b) The property to the north and west of the subject site is designated flood Control /Utility Corridor and is developed with the Cucamor,pa Creek Channel. The property to the east is designated Low (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family homes. The property to the south is designated future freeway and is undeveloped.. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Us, Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and w1th related development. and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Lane Use Element; and (e) This amendment would not b4 materially injWrious or detrti;aental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on Vie environment nor the surrounding properties and that issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission durinst the above - referenced pu0 is hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the property is suitable for the uses permitted ir. the proposed land use designation in terms of access1 and size as evidenced by the site's ability to conform to the City's development standards for single family residential uses; and (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findi,tgs of the Environmental Assessment; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan due to the site's capacity to promote the goals and objectives for residential development. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considereA :, compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 ands further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and ccnclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on this 26th day of September 1990, of General Plan Amendment No. 90 -01A as specified herein. 6. The Secretary to 'this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Hw,6 Al r i P+ANNINB COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 90 -01A - SHERWOOO September 26, 1990 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH LAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. t FILANNINE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Lavey T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: c Brad e-fi er, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamor,ga, do hereby ;certify that the foregoing Resolution was dull and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of September MCI,, by the following vote -to -wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSa i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTI0 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99 -01, REQUESTING, TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM "FC" (FLOOD CONTROL) TO "VL" (VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL) FOR TWO PARCELS 'CONSISTING OF 1.92 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NORIN AND SOUTH OF AN EXTENSION OF HIGHLAND AVENUE ADJACENT TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201- 200 -37 AND 1062 - 640 -57 A. Recitals. (i) Bob Sherwood, on behalf of Leslie Sherwood Barnes, has filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 90 -01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) On September 26, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public bearing on the application and issued Resolution No, recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. 90 -01A be approved. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts sel. forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the ;',`-ove- referenced public hearing on September 26, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to approximately 1.92 acres of Land, basically a narrow linear configuration, located in two parcels north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue on the east side of the Cucamongr Creek Channel and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently desig -iated as "FC" (flood Control) and 11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DDA - "-- -01 SHERWOOD September 26,. 1990 Page 2 L• (b) The property to the north and west of the subject site is designated "FC (Flood Control) and is developed with the Cucamonga Crerkk Channel. The property to the east is designated "L" (Low [residential, 2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family homes. The property to the south is designated "FC" (Flood Control) and is undeveloped. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the disc ict, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties dnd that issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. 3. Based upo:, the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragtzr;% 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the subject property is suitaoie for the .uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as evidenced by the site's ability to conform to the City's development standards for single family residential uses; and (b) Thet the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan due to the site's capacity to promote the goals, and objectives for residential development. - 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves 'chat pur«mnt to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Goverrinent Code, that the -rwiiing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on this 26th day of September 1990, of Development District Amendment No. 90 -01 as specified herein. Ask Ell, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DDA 90.01 - SHERWOOD September 26, 1990 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shalt certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ti APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGh BY: Larry T. McN e , Chairman ATTEST: Brad Butler, Secretary I, Brad Butter, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was 'nervy and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the P1Anning Commission held on the 26th day of September 1990, by the following vote- to -ioit. AYES: COMMISSIONERS- NOES: COMMISSIONERS- ABaENT: COMMISSIONERS: :1 XTY OF AM.40 ItCA"AONC' i i 6'A Atvti�Rw= �gtcln 'VELOPF 0 NFL lh1VF-S'i ln-)G CLVI C, EVS SMIMCE5 NV A "c)V4e A9' o pROpuZT4 Lge VU LL4` _eNkMaED TO MST elom -pS TAP OL"G tA VIIETIXZSM�- 3 ut-r 'cam stab m T1k1- yra- Otpirge Cp(i CJ--'& )E, AC,AtIOST CSC ASVO.,MG SEPI 26ASc IT..ALS P PL TO N vL=tXask TUG coo- 1cuyz " —.-t° U-s-as TOM i3*4 cum P- W1 LT A FE—Lk ., � Cl& 6i� X cuk Tt-k A PLAIQi GRADS MAe iPWO F UZ TO ENS WO- uaOU,. Q ONt -%", FSE 'VELOPF 0 NFL lh1VF-S'i ln-)G CLVI C, EVS SMIMCE5 NV A "c)V4e A9' o pROpuZT4 Lge VU LL4` _eNkMaED TO MST elom -pS TAP OL"G tA VIIETIXZSM�- 3 ut-r 'cam stab m T1k1- yra- Otpirge Cp(i CJ--'& )E, AC,AtIOST IT..ALS P PL TO PRIVACY _ P- W1 LT A FE—Lk ., � Cl& 6i� X cuk Tt-k A PLAIQi GRADS MAe iPWO F UZ TO ENS Ties -'PUT tt1�L� - STC?Ct4 5L�!+ ^c0 e%GtAT U-gg-T P WQ I ITAE Top cp cxjp, t lG t-t C.Lu- vtt_s.O t�1�1VE ill __ IUXU �I i'1F P't LAST TWO 'SPC1lC -IBa 5 `inj r--- We-- ywtAE' S %g TwRT tAcZ-seS txLx-V-.) SECURI1 f TAPE -,Aot+te PQOPOGe otv».O ARE 0 VIEW SLIZRo X\MXVQ - Ttx tc-z" zs AWO T AS l4kn .l dr, STRESTS, 'N '` aro Reaps mz, TO \N AT-774 00 00 SUPS\IE RS%\!t✓ yt�etf�y�tt_aAUT '�F4iS 0 PRESENT, WS Mr-tnSrAVO "THIS TO t= UMtlbt`.LS P-Ur tV\3 TmrA (, 7OiLt A ©sytwL'CC VQS%\M( . rA - PQ "SE T M ULn M AKe IT" AU AC)ST ItApg %j \sLC Tp t-AWL. Lyf2T1 r- pi "tL\11 l�WA�) FCtA�M ArA ry 1T \S 'ttZ 'CI.UInt^O 'TO K5Uy"T tACTAS -5, . i �H0RSES eWSOqS MAG OCC l MAL OPSSrAaE CF- ISUr 1E. MAW\l R -E QZIAMITIEG A \ EA(K S P - tG0 -70 PUZ ARSI UME'R DES orz cri ROM LNE.S`GOCK AME C`D'T StABLEO, Ax a.rR TAe QEFPL E-Si ARE -CVT MG.TtC &FO A CLp"USE C:MLO 6r-- u.)VkvT`mw `inj r--- We-- ywtAE' S %g TwRT tAcZ-seS txLx-V-.) { j CM TIAE MO%-V,--cq, 'F.00 V.01 WE 00 sc�3 E W "LLlT\-Y� 28gt Ozolp -m-T TO A !-^K)Q%kn3 CU V I )a PINCT ,N t LL LAW ie-S k'raZ%E$ M 'j YgEPT CA) -MME' C- `TA\ -zo %V? . -TRE SECT koro L C LLMkck� taiE 'ses c VISPIT is Two Mme' aeQj r Sig, GAC- Lr-r--4 WMA m PRNS • ' 1CUqj LEA v! A4fa4l0.' p' QS Poo{U`C�. !C= NCST >> 04 C ZEO C-M IA-\ R r r3 QQ 'U). f�L. 6t15 ==vaCM °S -tie FWESO t VAKM , ISLLI :DRAINAGr- bm f3& wpez IAM CSR `'o ALL OLXIZ -a es TO (Zr-- 'IMLU COCU N E TAO LPL 4M IsPer XJl`s` --3, - I '"\J kEX U'N'6�tt. To 1.r--4 EL upU �QT\4 WILL LUE %7,EQuvREJQ TO C ANCLE TAC- AaNAG c Pa CxiCZ NSE., NQ W \Li.. TIAE C3 r) % A l,= F OPQ a eAckNARO rUE TO L7S LV�L E-`J NX31gi3Ct t .1O KERP OF SURrOJI iDING W R'TURAL LAND? —� 'SE l RAC qi L °1 CLe A� 'C Ike LptVO� _ -- E Plyze covAeeao- leo k1rhouT IFt2 BOD 1- ROMS - i ' : "CO nAS TMVE t ST—�XD Dot i� i C mrm llgftt LAMS A LP► LkC�t TLX2Y�►1A t3'�i T�1c. PaU1L�1�2 SUf3t7t1! ISILIt�' �ttr 6�Rp4g6 �S A54 F� FALT �i2�MKi�tU� 'iNL�pC?'Ca4 tS w V4 =-1 tUOid.) Cif SOME mm- I'm Time PuTuae, Gzuem llskw i sue oiZ1Sf t]�,417 'C� � �1'O 1Ai '1Cat-4T�Y 3 CsI���'►'t�62._ E`,�tOtityT- - - - f /gyp+ �.ry 1 w , VET r' \.ILJ�� Le U LO4JG " a S % v A eCLO.P�.7 �y� y py yy ` M P G`.�"'�. B A%r ,i I' �Pe?d ��1 Sin QQ• t?��ii -�' A ►9E'�y� IJSE CAN _. —� 'SE AGR = C- i v\:� MAT ALL iyl ml-Neo�z-yoc.,- i [ �= alxwz -IZS R- %Glk -M C°R- UEa S9`5 Ntt-PC O—X, T-U %uK gt3u (=aL VWM -r1M1s, i eta Fred and Carla Richter 820.1 Highland. Avenue Alta Loma, CaLfornia 91701 's t J CFO APO September 20, 19900�1i�t!?�3?� A. elanning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Dear Sirs: We believe that the property noted in General Plan. Amendment 90 -01A: Sherwood should be, designated open space. If, however, the Planning CommiAsion decides to allow the low residential designation, the following Vams should be considered: 1) Restrict development to the two single family homes discussed in the neighborhood meeting. 2) Restrict pad ,,levation to protect views from'existing homes. 3) Deed restrictions to prevent horse property. d) Perpetual landscape and irrigation (by new home owners) of access road from HiglWhnd/Carol to p.Foposed two new homes. S) Perpetual access to hiking, horse, bilge path along the east side oftucamonga Creek channel (with that access restricting motorcycles, ATVs, A'DC's, onto.) for residents. Should you have any gnesdons, r1 -�= leave a message at 714- 980 -3072 grad we will be y glad to steak with you regarding this. Sincerely, Fred and Carla Richter f ��' DA -E: TO: FRnM: BY: SUBJECT: I. 11. CITE' OF PANCHO GUCAIVIQNGA , STAFF REPORT September 25, 1:990 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Miki Rtz t,'Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SPECIFIC rLAN 89 -01 CONSORTIUM "OF_ETIWANDA NnRTH LANDOWNERS---- A request to approve a Specific Plan for 5,080 dwelling units, 9.6 acres of commercial, and related school, park, and open space uses on 6,754 acres of land generally located north of 24th Street with portions north of Highland Avenue, south of the National Forest Boundary with portions within the National Forest, east of the extension of Milliken Avenue, and west, of the Fontana City limit. I ABS` 'ICT: Although the City council, the Planning Commission, the Pants Commission, and staff have invested a huge effort to process the Consortium's Etiwanda North Specific Plan, Rey elements of the plan are still missing or incomplete. Also, since February 1990, there Fes been no response by the Consortium to City efforts to continua processing the Specific Plan. For the above and other reasons, staff requests that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council denial without prejudicE' of the subject application. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS: Much Planning Commission, Trails Committee, Parks Comrission, City Council, and staff time has been invested on our Sphere of Influence and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. (See attached Exhibit "A ", Vicinity Hap.) Planning Commission 'Workshops. Eleven Planning Commission %rarkshops on the Consortium's Specific Plan were held between September 22, 1988 anti September 7, 1989. The primary focus of the workshops was design, including architectural styles, neighborhood design concepts, and community design concepts. These _iements of the Specific Plan were revised at the beginning of the Specific Plan process to respond to concerns of the Planning Commission, These elements were to be reviewed again in the context of review rf the entire Specific Plan. However, key elements needed to )e addressed before the Specific Plan could be considered complete and reviewed as a comprehensive plan. Elements of concern included grading issues, infrastructure Im P PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SP 89 -01 - CONSORTIUM SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 2 phasing and financing, parks, open space, trails, equestrian uses, fire management, and wildlife resources management. Three Planning Commission workshops were devoted to the Hillside Development Ordinance and subsequently, in 1anuary, 1990, the Ordinance was adopted. The last Planning Commission workshop was a joint meeting wit'1 the Park and Recreation Commission to discuss park issues, a'pote.ntial equestrian center, and trails. Park and Recreation Commission Review. The Park and Recreation Commission also discussed Etiwanda North park concept plans at five of their regular meetings. In September the Park and Recreation Commission requested major revisions to the Etiwanda North Park Plan. As of this date. no revisions to the park plans have been submitted to the City. Further, the Flood Control District subsequently notified the City that not only did they not want park uses indicated for Flood Control Lands, but that the site proposed for a community equestrian center, in the vicinity of 24th Street and Etiwanda Creek Channel, was not available for that use since it was committed for use as a wildlife habitat preservation and mitigation area. City Council Review. The City Council has addressed related issues within the Specific Plan area, including a Fire CFD and a General CFO which includes Drainage facilities and Police Services. Further, on May 2 and November 15, 1989, and February 7, 1990, the City Council discussed and adopted policy on annexation as it related to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The main element of the policy is that City Standards must be applied to development in the Sphere of Influence area. At the Marc:. and April 1990 - meetings of the Consortium of. Landowners, staff attended and indicated that City policy was firmly in support of City standards and that there was a conflict between City standards•and the density proposed by the Consortium. In June 1990, at the request of the Consortium, senior staff attended the monthly meeting of tfia Consortium and explained that the City Council policy to uphold City standards is in effect and reaffirmed that conflict does exist between City standards and density in the Specific Plan area. Consortium's Draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The P1r`ining Commission has received several preliminary versions of the draft Specific Plan. The last distribution was of the June 23, 1989, draft. Staff reviewed the June, 23, 1989, draft and advised the applicant that it was incomplete and that revisions would be required. Grading standards was a key issue which was C :z PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SP 89 -01 - CONSORTIUC' SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 3 subsequently addressee- by adoption of the Hillside Development Ordinance. Various other development standards continue to be an ti important issue as well. Also, the park and open space sections required substantial review and revision.. On February 14, 1990, the applicant submitted a screen check draft Specific Plan for staff review. (A copy is includEd in the Commission's agenda packet,) The applicant stated that one of the changes in the plan was to decrease lot sizes by Iq percent throughout the Specific Plan area in order to meet 'L4ie City standard of a 60 foot, right -of -way for local streets. The effect of that change would have been to further increase the density permitted in the Specific Plan area and reduce lot sizes below the 5,500 square foot minimum then proposed for the University tracts. Staff responded, stating that "substantial changes" in development standards are proposed which will require detailer' staff review, as well as policy direction from the Planning Commission and the City Council. As noted" above, an Etiwanda North sub - committee of the City Council was formed and the Council as a whole directed staff to firmly uphold City standards of development. Environmental Impact Report. An EIR must be prepared for the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and preparation began in February 1989. In February 1990 the Etiaanda North EIR consultant notified the City that additional services would be needed to evaluate revisions to the Traffic Study and Resource Management Plan. Staff evaluated the consultant's proposal and discussed it with the applicant. In April 1990 staff requested that the additional EIR services be funded by the applicant. No response to that request has been received from the applicant. Specific Plan Status. In March 1990 staff forwarded a project status report to the applicant indicating major items which were still incomplete. In April 1990 staff again forwarded a project - status report. In May 1990 the most recent project status report was prepared and forwarded to the applicant. (See Exhibit "B °, letter dated May 21, 1990, and Specific Plan Status Report.) Each report indicates that although progress had been made, key elements of the Specific Plan were still missing or incomplete. County Processing. In negotiating to process the Consortium's applications in the City, staff made it clear that processing of applications in the County would be opposed. At their April 1990 monthly meeting, Consortium members reviewed the conflict between City standards and the Consortium's density: demands and decides; to process development in the County. In , April 1990 the University Crest project was reactivated in the fi PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SP 89 -01 - CONSORTIUM SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 4 Aft County. In June 1990 the Consortium filed an application for a1% Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the County of approximately 5,499 ` acres„ The smaller area Specific Plan omits Landmark's Oak Summit application filed in the County in November 1989 for a private golf course and 6.20 units on 761 acres of land. The County application also omits all projects in the Etiwanda North area which have already been annexed into the City. (See attached Exhibit "C" Status Report for Sphere Projects, September 12, 1990.) Applica I Intentions. On May 21, 1990, a letter was sent to the applicai,. noting that ,applications had been filed in the County and asking whether thcty intended to continue processing City applications. (See Exhibit "B ", letter dated May 21•- 1990.) No response has been received regarding City processing. ' III. SUMMARI. As of this date, the applicant has filed and is processing applications in the County which duplicate applications which have been fi:z; in the City. The City applications have been inactive since February 1990. The applicant has not responded to the April 1990 request for additional services and funds for completion of the EIR. Also, the applicant has not responded to the May 21, 1990, letter stating whether they do, or do not, wish to process in the City. On the key issE, of density, the applicant has stated that the Consortium will not negotiate. Finally, the applicant has not responded to requests to re:-Ise elements of the Specific Plan in favor of City standards. IV. CONCLUSION: Based on the above information, staff recommends approval of the attached Resolution recommandi`ng to the City Council denial without prejudice of the subject application. r Respectfull4 Gubmitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:MB :mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Letter of May 21, 1990 and attached Specific Plan. Status Report, May 1990 Exhibit "C" Status %%port for Sphere Project, Sep!+:mber 5, 1990 Resolution of Denial El � � Tl RtT!llt4t RtT5T i� 1� LEGEND IMIMit 1 PLAN W- 01$rWANDA NOWM o•�•o• Specific Plan 89 -01 • be-%UDES AREAS 2 ^/. & A -E '=A Z UNIVE[ MYOFI„ALIFORNIAJCARYN 3 LANDMARKDEVLPMP.CO. 4 CHENG SAN SEVADM 5 CHANG 6 CHENG EMU ME COWLETM." "' XAMONS: A 3 CARYN, 8= WATT m AND, C =AR& -. JAL D a WATTM AND EbUTM & E fi BLAC AMMOMESTRAD/ REi1.ifi1GGT�0N F -XIS'P G MY SFHM OF IIIFLUENCE a 7� ;� y i . - It �*y • • r .rrEgM :: �}�ENSS}F�aq!8�,/9- 'tf���9 N TTI.E: Tl{r[17AE Y MAP mmrr: -A- SCALE: NON2. 26Myr90 CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 21, 1990 Mr. Joe Dilorio Etiwanda North Landowners Consortium P.O. ,ox 216 South Laguna, CA 92677 -0216 Pose Office Boa 807, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 917:9*(: 14) 989 -1851 SUBJECT: ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN 89 -01; ANNEXATION 89 -01; ANNEXATION 89 -02 (UNIVERSITY TRACTS TT 14492, 14494, 14495, 14522, 14523, ETC.) AND CREST TRACTS Dear Mr. DiIorio: The County has advised us that a Specific Plan application for a portion of the Etiwanda North area was submitted to the County on May 9. 1990 and that the University Creat application has been activated in the County. Therefore, pease advise us whether you wish to continue processing the above applications in the City. A status update for these projects is attached. On May 2, 1990, . the City Council affirmed that applications in the Sphere of Interest must be consistent with the Rancho Cucamonga General Pbn and the Development Standards. Therefore, the Specific Plan and Tract Maps submitted to the City lust be revised to be consistent with that direction. It should be noted that the County General Plan requires that 'Planning- in the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence must be consistent with County General Plan Policy LU -9 which indicates that City Standards be used in Sphere areas where higher than County Standards. The City Council has directed staff tp process any and all applications in the City's Sphere of Influence to be consistent with the City General Plan and City Development Code. Therefore, we invite the Consortium to either modify the Etiwanda North Specific Plan to be consistent with this Council direction or withdraw your application. Please let us know your intentions as soon as possible. %faw+ William;. Alexander /l / Chaaes ). Buquet u Dennis L Stout' Deborah N. Brown iVC ' CP Pamela . Wrrsht !ackLam ill" Joe Diiorio Applications May 21, 1990 Page 2 If you have any questions please call Larry Henderson or myself at " (714) 9SP -1961. Si Ys f i B d B / City anne BB:LH:mlg i Attachment: Etiwanda North Project.Status Update cc: Jon Mikels Jack Lam. City Manager Rick Gomez, Community Dev. Director Sharon Hightower John McMains i Is ETIWANDA NORTH PROJECT STATUS UPDATE MAY 16, 1990 ti M1 SPECIFIC PLAN. The application for Specific Plan is still incomplete.. Specific Plan Consistency with the City Gc. -eral Plan. The application as submitted by the ' onsortium is incomplete, because a oroject phasing plan has not been completed and because an application to amend the General Plan has not been received. In accordance with State law, a Specific Plan must be consistent with the City General Plan. Because to date, no application for General Plan Amendment has been received from the Consortium, the City Council has directed staff to revise the Specific Plan to be consistent with the City General Plan and to proceed with the pre zoning of the Specific Plan area. TRACT MAPS. The applications for Tract Maps are still incomplete. Tract Maw Consistency with the City General Plan. Tract Map submittals and review must proceed on the basis of consistency siith the City General Plan and the City Development Code. University and Crest Pro9ects. Because large areas of the University and Crest Tracts are designated as open space in the City's General Plan, Tract Map review cannot roceed until an application for an amendment to the General Plan is received. As stated in pre - application meetings prior to the Specific Plan application in February 1989, City staff is reeepti o, to a General Plan Amendment for the University of California property because of urbanization of the surrounding land uses, the residential designation on the County General Plan Land Use Map, and the University's proposal to transfer ail development rights off a 675 acre property on the upper Day Creek Watershed and dedicate it as permanent open space. This is consistent with the City policy of no development above the National Forest boundary. Potential Land Use Consistency of the University Property. A change from open space to residential use designation of the 1niversity property would be consistent with surrounding land uses. The adjacent City Standard is+ Low density, 2 -4 dwelling units per acre, and Very Low density, less than two dwelling units per acre. The County Standard is generally residential, and also varies from south to north from "up to 3 dwelling units per acre" to "up to 2 dwelling units per acre." Land use plans submitted to the County and to the City indicate several tracts as residential use in the density range of 4.8 dwelling units per acre. This would not be consistent with t%o surrounding land uses and a General Plan Amendment for this intensity of use would not be supported by the City. (e— g ETIWANDA NORTH PROJECT STATrJS' Page 2 Potential. Land Use Consistency for a Portion of the Crest Project. A portion of the Crest project is designated as open space in the City General Plan. The existing County designation I. residential, "up to 2 dwelling units per acre." The City designation would be Very Low density, up to 2 dwelling units per ,cre. Consistency with the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. The folio-wing is a review of general lot size and development, standards of the City and crmparison with County Standards for the University and Crest Tracts: A. Lot Size Standard for University Property. County Development Standards Section 88.0520 and City Development Standards (Section 17.14.0200) provide that a Specific Plan /Planned Communit;+ "may" dif "er from general Development Standards. However, the underlying standards and compatibility with adjacent development for the zone provide a reference for evaluation of proposals. The 'underlying City Standard in the Low range requires a 7,200 square foot minimtria lot size and 8,000 square foot average lot size for developmnt on a slope of less than 8%. For slopes greater than 8%, the City Hillside Development ® Ordinance density formula must be applied. Also, the City's method of calculating density is on the gross acreage after the deduction for parks, arterisl, secondary and collector streets. Thn underlying County Standard for the West Valley area is 7,7.►0 square foot minimum lot size. B. Lot Size Standards for a Portion of the University y ract. The underlying City Standard In the Very Low Densit; designation requires a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and an average lot.size of 22,000 square feet. The underlying Count;- Standard is for a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. C. Density Bonus Standard. Excellence in das _., is the case City Standard for development, therefore, the City does not offer a density bonus for good design. The County offers a density bonus of up to 10% based on public benefit above the minimum standard for development. ANNEXATION. The applications for annexation are deemed complete on the basis of completion of the City's Fiscal Impact Study. The Council has directed staff to proceed with Annexation actions. Intent to Annex. The City Council approved Resolutions of Intent to nne7 z territory at the May 15, 1990 meeting of the City Council. -The purpose of adopting these resolutions is to keep the annexation process on track so that the application for Specific Plan and Tract review can be processed in the shortest amount of time consistent with the complexity of the applications. ?— t City of Rancho Cucamonga DATE: September 12. 1990 TO: Distributionust SUBJECT: S¢.atus Report for Sphere Projects FROM: Advanced Planning Project Rick Gomez "Acm D Vs Density Lot 81ze A®erago/ � Status / Lead Planner Shintu Bose Jack Lam Dan Coleman Betty Miller Jerry Fulgtgod Minimum Ingrid Blair r-o City r.nccii adopted Resolution of 1] Inter.; m Annex on 5/ 16: applicelon ETTwANDA tiled with LAFCO 6/15. City Council RL..sution of Intent to prepare specific NORTH City 67ru' 4 5080 not Varies Plan approved 6/20; specific Fbw SPECIFIC avalL ::ar area cbrianct awarded 7/ 18; drat due 9/ 14 PLAN AREA EIR rwls!ons in progress; screen check draft due e/31. Henderson /Brett County Referral 88 - 05 (2 *] Application activated in County. University final Developmftit Plan. Master of Tenatfve and Tenative TtrAct Maps filed University California/ 426 1293 3.1 6,C00 in County: sdredulcd fm, City CC 9/5. Crest Caryn sq ft min City PC 12 Co. PC 10/11. EIR to be , amended. City opposes County processing. IStanglel Brat' Ca mty Referral 89 - 03 e 13 *1 Landmark 10.890 landmark oubmitted County Land 761 620 CA sq ft avg. applicat nn'orPlannedi)- elopment & Genera; Man Amendment. Final D-v. Oak Devlpmt. 10.000 Plan /1Yact maps/Parcel maps will be SAmmii Co, sq ft miry continued to Oct. DRC. EIRwill be requited. (Fable[ Brett County Referral 90-02 is '] CopHeig his County for General an Amendment / 172 450 2.65 7. X00 from Flood- Conbol to Residential. San C her_- er_- Rn City opposes General PlaaAmendment Sevaine County staff does not support ElRwill be required. IStaffordl Brett County Referral 90 - 03 [5s] Pre-application submitted to Chang 11.76 40 4.55 10.000 County for GP Amendment. PD l/ I to A RES 3. City opposes General Plan No sq ft min. Amendment County staff does not Title support. EIRwlii be required. [Stafford) Brett � immentswillbe NoHeights 160 128 not not Pn Dev. Corp./ avail. avail. he C� unty. Ti tle Che Brett Land OLLww CountyReferrai 90-06 171 Consortium 5500 2975 not uarles same as apnumtion in City. EXCEFr, awls does not It .. t Lindmark & pmJects annexed .&'Mn Brett T43�e*i.3 )r Projects FsQjects 1530.8 2531 1.76 _ ' a` s �2 °] thr® 6• ° _-> Included in EUwanda Distribution: North Specific Plan rbroarpYYtN.rmtb..- SaW.ajord left [R /letter] a=> map key Clty Council Rick Gomez Jae Schultz Supvr. Jon Mlkels Brad Buller Karen Emery PlanningCommisslon Otto Kroutil Shintu Bose Jack Lam Dan Coleman Betty Miller Jerry Fulgtgod Bev Nissen Ingrid Blair r-o BruceBucidnph (County Stal" 11 11 W-FW 1699 +"..seo EXHIBIT "C" City of Rancho : = xamonga DATE. September 12,1990 SoalECC Status Report for Sphere Projects (continued) Completed Animations _2. Lot Size Project ' Applicant P�Cx�t DWO Name 1 Gross Average! NMUIMnm status / Lead. Phu tx [A] Caz1n/ IA -;A Certification January 30,1989 EUwanda SWUlard 30..R 546 2.0 Eii,Wands Pacific (13564!13565) et. al. Nissen UTCO Certification [BI September 21.19W Tract iad 96 252 2.6 1L52a Nissen LP.FCG Certification [ #/letter] =a map k j ;. I NIL 81® �\ �JAN VAU ......., _ LEGEND famme! I SPECIFIC FLAN 90-01 ETIWANDA NORTH => INCLUDES AREAS 2 - 6 & A - E 2 UNIVERSITY OFCALIFORNIA/CARYN 3 LANDMARK DEVLPMT. CO. 4 CHENG SAN SEVAM 5 CHANG 6 CHENG HILLSIDE CObBIEfED ANNEXATIONS• A •= CARYN, B = WATT IN' -AND, C = AHMANSON, D = WATT INLAND EMPIRE, & E :s BLACKMAN/HOMESTEAD/ REMINGTON EXISTING CITY SPHERE OF INFLUENCE ITEM: STATUS FOR SPPZRE CTI°Y OF CAMONGA Tm.E: ViCiNri°Y MAC F 13 IOIY (� V — 1 EJ{Mrr., "All SCALE: NONE, E xh� b,t 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL WITHOUT - PREJUDICE -OF SPECIFIC PLAN 89 -01, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF 24TH STREET WITH PORTIONS NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE NATIONAL FOREST BOUNDARY WITH PORTIONS WITHIN THE — ATIONAL FOREST, EAST OF THE EXTENSION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND WEST OF THE FONTANA CT.TY LIMIT. A. Recitals. (1) The Consortium of. Eriwanda North Landowners has 'filed an applicatinn as described in the t.:l'e of this Resolution. Hereilafter in this Resolution, the subject Specific Plan is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th of September 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuwamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of RanchG Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Reselution are true and correct. 2. Based ,upon: substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 26,,1990, including written and oral staff .reports, together with pu blic testimon y, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The property to the north, south,' east, and west of the subject site is undeveloped. 3. gas €d upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The Specific Plan is not consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. e. Environmental studies have not been completed, therefore, the application is not in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. C .� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. SP 89 -01 - CONSORTIU,! SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 2 S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends denial tAthout prejudice of the application. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF.SEPTEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCMIONGA BY: Ls' -y T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City or Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certii;y that the ::foregaing Resolution was dt,ty and Alak regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the planning Commission, od the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of September 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: CUi;!ISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: AMk I� t F, i! DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST "F REPORT September 26, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Miki Bratt, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACTS 14493 THROUGH 14498 14522 AND 14523 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13128 — REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AND CARYN DEVELOPMENT A request for anprovai of seven tentative tract maps and one parcel map for 633 dwelling units, a 9.3 acre commercial site, a 4.56 acre park site, and a 7.17 acre school site on approximately 179 acres of land located generally rorth of Highland Avenue, south of a Southern California Edison utility corridor, west of Hanley Avenue with portions west of the future Day Creek Boulevard, and east of Day Creek wash. I. ABSTRACT: The subject applications were filed in the City for concurrent processing with the Consortium's Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The subject applications are incomplete. The Consortium, including the applicant, is not pursuing their Specific Plan application or its environmental review in tha City. The applicant has not filed a General Plan Land Use Amendment in the City. The Consortium, including the applicant, is not pursuing annexation into the City. The subject applications are virtually identical to tentitive tract map applications in the County for the University portion of the University Crest Planned Deveiopmeat for which the Planning Commission and the City Council have requested that City staff forward a recommendation for continuance, or denial, to the County Planning Commission until key issues can be resolved. Unless the sphere territory is annexed, the City does not have the authority to approve the subject applications. For the above reasons, staff is recommending denial without prejudice of the subject applications. II. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: A. Agreement for Concurrent Processing: The subject. maps have beea filed with the City for the purpose of concurrent' processing with the Consortium's Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The City does not have the authority to approve Tentative Tract Maps unless the territory is annexed into the City. ITFY�i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14493 -98, 14522 -23, P.M. 13128 REGENTS UNIVERSITY /CARYN DEVELOPMENT September 26, 1990 Page 2 B. Specific Pian Status: The status of the Consortium's Specific Pla,, will be reviewed by the Planning Commission elsewhere on this agenda. Tine Consortium of Landowners is not pursuing their Specific Plan application in the City, The Consortium was notified in February 1990 that the Specific Plan screen check draft, February 14, 1990, could not be supported by staff, and therefore tract map prscessing could not continue. (See attached letter.) The Consortium's response was to file an application for a Specific Plan in the County. C. General Pian Amendment Status: An application to amend the Land Use and Circulation elements of the General Plan are required in conjunction with the subject applications because the current land use designation for the site is "open space" and Day Creek Boulevard is planned as a curved section into Wilson /24th Street. To date, no General Plan amendmept� have been filed. D. Environmental Review Status: Finally, environmental review for the subject applications is required. However, the Consortium, including the applicant is not pursuing completion of the City's Etiwanda North Specific Plan Environmental qP Impact Report which would provide the basis for environmental review for the subject applications. E. Tract Map Status: For Tentative Tracts 14493 through 14495 and 14522 and 14523, incompleteness letters were sent on October 10, 1989. A letter response dated November 29, 1989: was received, but did nat resolve the incomplete status. Or. December 27, 1989, a seond set of incompleteness letters was sent, but no response has Fien received for those letters. For Tentative Tracts 14496 through 14498, incompleteness _, letters were sent on Jpnuary 4, 1990. To date no response has been received for }hose letters. F. Relationship of Tract Maps to County Referral 88 -05 - Universi U Crest. It should be noted that the subject applications ara for the University tracts of the University .; Crest Planned Development application first submitted to the County in June 1988. Beginning in February 1989, the County application was put on d month to month continuance. The continuance of the County application coincided with City processing of the Consortium's Etiwanda North Specific Plan. In April 1990, the applicant activated the University /Crest Planned Development application in the County and also :filed applications for tentative tract maps for all the University and all the Crest site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14493 -98, 14522 -23, P.M. 13128 REGENTS UNIVER5,ITY /CARYN DEVELOPMENT September z6i 1990 Page 3 City staff has reviewed all the plans and maps submitted to the County and recommends continuance or denial of the County applications until outstanding issues, including environmental adequacy, timeliness, density, and design, can be resolved. The Planning Commission at their meetings of August 22 and September 120 1990, and the City Council at their meeting of _ September 5, 1590, 'directed staff to request the County Planning Commission to continue or deny the University Crest project in the County until the aforementioned issues have been resolved. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial without prejudice of the subject applications for the following reasons:_ A. The subject applications are incomplete. B. The environmental review rar the subject applications has not been completed. C. An app ?ication for a Ga�neral Plan Land Use and Circulation Amendments have not been filed. D. The City_ does not have the authority to approve tentative tract applications until the site is pre -zoned and annexed into the City. Respectfully submitted, Brad Sun er City Planner BB:MB :js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Hap Resolution of Denial ;i F I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE PITY OF RANCHO CUCAFJNGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING WITHOUT PRE'pDICE TENTATIVE TRA^;' MAPS NO. 14493 THROUGH 14498, 14522, AND 14523 AND PARCEL MAP 13128 LOCATED GENERALLY NORTH OF HIGH`AND AVENUE, a"'<<TH OF A SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON UTILITY EASEMENT, WEST OF HANLEY AVENUE olITH PORTIONS WEST OF THE FUTURE DAY CREEK MULEVARD, AND EAST OF DAY CREEK WASH, AND MAKING; FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) Caryn Company has filed an application for the approuai of Tentative Tract Map No. 14493 through 14498, 14522 and 14523, and Parcel Map 13128 as dr.scribed in the. title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject 'tentative Tract Map and Parcel Map requests are referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 2Gth of September 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All 1eq ;0 prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Pesolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fats set fort'. in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presen }' 4 to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on :)eptemLar 26, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together w'tn public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The property to the north, south, east, and west of tie subject site is undeveloped. 3, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The application is not consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; and (b) The site is not physically suitable for the type of development proposed. PLANNING COMMISSION1 RESOLUTION NO. TT 14493 -98, 14522 -23, P.M. 13128 September 26, 1990 Page 2 4. Environmental ::wdies have not been completed, therefore, the application is not in compliant with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby denies without prejudice the application. 6. The Secretary to tl`• "s Commission shall certify to the adoption of thic Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1590. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE L3TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNie , Chairman ATTEST: � Brad Buller, Secretary L, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution w,�s duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commis-ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of September 1990, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: - ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '? STAFF hEPORT DATE: September 26, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, city Planner BY: Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 90 -09 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - she proposed development of an 11,105 Square foot animal shelter building on 0.9 acres of land as part of the City of Rancho Cucamonna's Sports Complex facility, located at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and arrow Route in the General Industrial District (Subarea (3) of the Industrial Specific Plan - APN: 229 - 011 -22. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested_ Approval of conceptual site plan, buii4ing elevations, grading plan and landsce plan. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Manufacturing, agriculture and vacant; - Subarea 8 - Industrial Specific Plan South - Manufacturing; Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial - Suoarea 9 - Industrial Specific Plan Eest - Roofing and machine shop, agriculture and vacant; General Industrial - Sube l 8 - industrial Specific- Plan. West - Vacant and agriculture; General Indus± -lal - Subarea 8 - Industrial Specific Plan C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - Heavy Industrial East General Industrial West - General Industrial rM R PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 90 -09 - CITY OF R.,ACHO CUCAMONGA September 26, 199O Page 2 11 0 D. Site Characteristics: The project site is vacant and level, generally sloping from north to sAuth at a 2 perc it gradient. There is one Eucalyptus tree located on site . other significant vegetation occurs on the subject property. No animals or significant cultural, historical or scenic aspects are associated with the immediate property. Parking: Required Provided 14 Employees 14 spaces 14 spaces 1 Parking Space /Employee 4 Service Vehicles 4 spaces 4 spaces 1 Parking Space /Service Vehicle Parking for the animal shelter has been proposed to provide the ne,.essary parking for the maximum number , r employees and service vehi.les that would be needed to serve tt City at maximum build - out. There would be 1,225 standard par'_tng spaces available for use in conjunction with the City's proposed Sports Complex faciiitv_ The animal shelter is essentially part of the Sports Complex "park," and therefore, could share parking with that facility, It is not expected that more than one or two spaces will be necessary to serve the public at any time. II. ANALYSIS: A. General, The proposed project consists of an 11,1GS square foot single story building for public animal care and ancillary uses. The pr-posed building would contain areas for kennels, animal receiving, food preparation, adoption, clinical office, and storage uses. An enclosed service area at the back of the facility would provide a delivery area, employee parking, trash, and an animal exercise area. The facility has been designed coabining traditional elements of both the mission and craftsman styles of architecture. The intent of the design is to integrate the animal shelter voirt the i►ports Complex by providing a building that would emulate certain elements of the Sports Complex stadium yet provide a waruter residential feeling for the public. The architectural design, site plan, and la dscaping for the proposed animal shelter will provide for an Intograted appearance with the proposed City Sports Complex project, The proposed site plait and architecture are consistent :0th plans approved for the Sports Complex. The site plan and " L_J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 90 -09 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 26, 1990 Page 3 4 t architecture are consistent with the design goals and policies of the Industrial Specific Plan for the proposed use. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee Chitiea, Tolstoy, and Kroutil) first reviewcu the project on July 19, 1990, and requested changes to the plans to enhance the design. The Committee (Chitiea, To'stoy, and Kroutil) gave the final review of the plans on August 2, 1990. The arciaitect, presented two alternative building designs (see Exhibits 6-1 and D -2), one with a mission revival style parapet and the other with a straight horizontal parapet. The Ca---mitee recommended the approval of the project as propose -? subject to the f0l Planning Commission's detcrmisstion of the final parape!" design (alternatives shown an Exhit "ts D -1 and D -2) and the following conditions: 1. The tale wainscot should emulate the wainscot on the stadium and be scaled to the proportions of the animal shel ter. 2. Tile should be used instE,ad of the glass block on the parapet; accents and the window details and quatrefoil should be similar to those details on the stadium. 3. TF.,_ coping of the parapet walls should emulate Via green coping at the top of the stadium walls The parapet wall imrst :ereer. e roof mounted equipment. 4. A sight line udy should be completed to norure that roc' mounted .equipment will be screened from all directions i -tcli.ding from inside the stadiur. S. SPeci4 structures such as wood cross- members should to used over the roof mounted equipment for screening. 6. Concrete pedestrian seating should be prcvided at the entrance plaza.: 7. Up- lighting and soffit lighting should be used in conjunction with ccrriage style wall lights to light the area outs ds of the building at the main entrance, 8. The plaza area at the entrance should utilize the same paver as approved for t:e stadium entrance.. PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 90 -09'- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONUA September 26, 199p Page 4 a 9. The trash enclosure should be architecturally treated to match the building and incorporate roil -up doors, a self - closing service door, and an overhood trellis with a chain link screen underneath. Revised plans and additional information addressing the foregoing comments have been submitted cnd reviewed by staff and are incorporated within the conceptual plans or conditions of approval. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Cz;,.mitte& has reviewed the project and determined z:` with the recommended conditions of approval, the project is codsistent with applicable standards W ordinances. D. Environmental Assessment: Environmental Assessment for r�P proposed project was crmpleted by the Park and Recra,,..on Commission at there regular meeting of July 19, 1990. At that mei-11ing the Park and Recreation Commission rpproved plans and recommended issuance of a mitigated negative declaration fur the Sports Complex (DR 90 -04). including the Animal Shelter as part ct the Sports Complex campus, Trae Removal Permit 90 -•33 addressing the removal of one Eucalyptus tree on the Animal Shelter site war approved as parr; of the review. On aeptember 12, 1490, Planning Commission reviewed an amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan (ISOA 90 -03) addres,0ag certain circulation and zone changes for the Sports Complex;, The impacts as r renult of the Sports Cenpler operations were reviewed with a nttigated negative declaration by the Pa ,,k and Recreation Commission, Part II of the Initil Study indicated no significant adverse en}iroumental impacts ! as a result of tht7 proposed cssndmea t. The Pi Inning Commission recommended the issuance of a mi Z gated Negative- Declaration. ill. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Deveiopament Code and the General Plan. The proposed use, building design and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, a.na in compliance with all applicable City standards, In addition, the property will not be detrimental to the adjacent . properties or cause adverse P,vircnmental impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notice of a Vablic meeting was posted on site and mailed to proper "'y owners within 300 feet of the subject, proper.A•y, r PLAroNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 90 -09 CITY OF }nANCHO CUCAMOPGA September 26, 199'i Page 5 4 V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Plarming Commission determine which style, of parapq:: is to be used and approve Development Review 90 -09 subject ;c conditions by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval, qRef ly s ed, r PS :BA: js Attachments: Exhibit ",A" - Vicinity Man Exhibit "6" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" Floor '!an Exhibit "D" Perspe -tive /Parapet Alternatives. Exhibit: "E" - Sections Exhibit "F" - Elevat =qns i Exhibit "G° Detr 1 ` Exhibit "Nb" Grh Plan Exhibit "Ia '- 1 e Plan Resolution of with Conditions i r. i t �` I r - _ U •mom,'. � 1 _ dim xx ILE cod 'e- Y � --"''- ..mss. _ _, ,_ .._. _ w• _..ti' ' AARO'w 90UTE• . i1 LIU I a� 1 � its 1 a s - -- CL ,> U.L�, U.• f ` i i • (S ' j'(IjI i �� a _� 0 1 ' ?L -. ___nom, lj La T.—i• e f n a ,�lS� a =� - ��. � 1 f Y �:. ' }ti '. Ill ♦ I� � ��� t ���"{� W' f_ w j I�LHIIZ�- ll ��i .per �_ `a. ����e.• r E LL1 L.. Zj y %I A J . zi �J y l Y, k' .��• i� i '.4J nFy; lip i I �a [, I Z 0 F' ., LU F c w BS I Nita Q lLU Fri �, It j z ES Q ' s� a co fill i� o MELAI ES IRE IV- K" V p� e l z, r W cr- 'V r7� t 3 w z to CL w W tit cc Lu i o- s '- w� C." zz Luw ,! Mo rT ,. � ''� � �'• �� Usk wt— it 4 It IN —t7— _�•'►` 3� -- t '_ -' ILI rR ra I V Vzz V S CCC 3 y a c5 ZW � W r WYE � v �w • �'�� T i�,�� Nt LU o I J V 47 pQ LU '=^ LI 0701-02 009-26-90,PC Agenda i6of 6 WN A 1 R' M 1 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMOMGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 90 -09, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229- 011 -22. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for the Design Review No. 90 -09 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review rer:lest is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th of September 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFO.,, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the R�,ci als, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on September 26, 1990, including written. and oral staff reports, this> Commission hereby specifleally finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at _the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue with a street frontage of 183 feet and lot depth of 205 feet and is presently unimproved; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is manufacturing, vacant and agriculture; the property to the south of that site consists of manufacturing; the property to the east is a roofing and machine shop, and vacant; and the property to the west is agriculture and vacant; and (c) The Sports Complex will provide 1,215 standard parking spaces which could be used in conjunction with and exceeds parking required for the Animal Shelter. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOL17ION NO, DR 90 -09 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 26, 1940' Page Z (d) The appiication complies with the applicable Urban Design Goals and Objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial- evidence presented to this Commissien during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings cf facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of tho General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of I the Jevelopment Code and the purposes of the disci °. ^t in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial ,Specific Phan; and (d) That the proposed ma, 'together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not. be detrimental to the public health, safety, or zelfare or materially to properties or improvements in the vizinity. 4. Based upon the fintings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commissior hereby approves the aprlic3ti,on subject to each and every condition -set *orth below and in the attachhwd Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: 1. That the proposed animal shelter, will be built in conformance with the conceptual plans as approved by the Planning Commission cn September 26, 1590. 2. That -1proval of this Development Review is subject to :all applicable ronditions of DP 90 -04 and ISPA 90 -03. 3. The file wainscot should emulate the wainscot on the stadium and be scaled to the proportions of the animal shelter. 4. Tile should be used instead of the glass block on the parapet accents and the window details and quatrefoil should be similar to those details on the stadium. 5. The coping of the parapet walls should emulate the green coping at the top of the stadium wails. The parapet wall must screen any roof mounted equipment. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 90 -49 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 26, 1990 Page 3 6. A sight line study should be compacted to ensure that roof mounted equipment will be screened from all directions including from inside the stadium. 7. Special structures such as wood cross - members should be used over the roof mounted equipment for screening. S. Concrete pedestrian seating should he provided at the entrance plaza. 9. Up- lighting and soffit lighting should be used with the carriage style wall lights to light the area o,.ftside of the building at the main er; rance. 10. The plaza lrea at the entrance should utilize the same paver as approved for the stadium entrance. 11. The trash enclosure should be architecturally treated to match the building: and incorporate roll -up doors, a self - closing sertlice door, and an overhead trellis with a chain liAl.: screen uric rneath. Engineering Division: 1. An in -lieu fee as :e':mbursement fer the previously undergroun.dod overhead utilities (tele;*ommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits, The fee shall be one half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage, 2. Landscaping within the "Limited Use Area" for the project access point shail be approved by the City Engineer. 3. There shall be a minimum 5 foot separation between the outer edge of a mature tree base and the outside of a storm drain pipe on the east side of the Animal Shelter Facility. 4. Arrow. Route shall be constructed full width (including street lights) from the west site boundary to 'Rochester Avenu;.t including the full Rochester /Arrow Route intersection. Off-site parkways may be deferred until development of the rdjacent property. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of off -site improvements from future development of the adjacent property, 5. Master_Pian Storm Drain line 17A shall be constructed from the project west boundary to Day Creek Channel - prior to the issuance of building permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 90 -09 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 26, 1990 Page 4 Ask 6. If the site is not constructed at the same time as the spots complex,; a Drainage Report will be required to identify interim drainage measures, in particular protection measures from northerly flaws. 7. The access frond the parking lot. at the northwest portion of the property shall be 90 degrees to the interior street with a minimum stacking distance of 25 feet. 8. Turf block shall not be placed within a standard parking lot area as shown on the plans, but it or a suitable alternate material may be placed In an overflow parking area if separated from the standard parking area by a rolled curb. S. The Secretary to this Commission shall .certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AHD ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTE;iT • • Brad Buller, Secretary I. Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby, certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of September 1990, by the following vote- to -vit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 4i4A L Y OLr rl1 1' NOrr 'd Or .dd == aY Dp 9 yO« N.h 5yp� e� ;r Y O w.V -1 615 -3N dO0 y.��Ya4s Vwa GO C �`Q ANY �Ci O� o� pY �w9va. oc� � ppQ% p °�aNa °aY `od ��in -Q �r�dYJRy.wY.m Lit 8fiip 6. YY M R.' C ✓. Yq CNt .7 Ny ■` pp YY C�j� pIC�Y�N YyW u.Yi O.G Gz- �.w ✓Y'�9AL ,CdN LIS ,✓yNOy�UN. Niv iOis�Y +.Yt � S. -t9` 1 qp U Y Y 3 R M C C M Y a 9'r Y 4r ^ p 9 BE �GVrt.L C�w �Y�r YCq�o YY 6� +Li OYC. Gy ✓�jYC p tit a�M Y.1Rr3 L 9y. Ay Y = $ �rq= 3LpN' rYN d-NV Ol•11Y.Ed«a-, CYq u CCq■■( 4r4 a�.MMN.wQ r.` t aY �� Y 49 Y b..q .t 40% fr „p �p YggL >�A�C CtSN 4Qa rYC4 YC D.wM 9sC QiyE LNr typ� �■YG4 NyC�tYa --.ry ✓ +L^ OIM ®'uLN. Evy■.; L Dew S�r YYwi 06~W-ti 6�1 6y� p4�.. yrOYr ND�Yq Ni O.tY.� -W~ 3Y C YY N N §gGpj' 0 A a V q ■O `tq��7ur.�.?V RAG C ��V(L4� bt4 �0 �C YMIV L Y O'G NG r 6 3 p 0 6 w ✓� p% Y M L lg �C m SOG ]4 ;�� GrL O ICY rp�p9Otel+d1YYC _N 4 O Y �40 Mqyy w Y p �'�a „a� yQ ^MO Yy' .0 {�• Y up i�iCtlYY Yr V y0 cu -NZEWEZ {a� R R NYQa�3 C O 6. O CwYQC N V �Y. « /p+M M�CrU F M Y S p u . lY If 4 Y� O OO d tl p.M G R. � � Gllfti XrC• Q p �sSi {pq � CYO tlON y�M. C Yp. Ai O Y.� iy� sa V g $ y1II aNi IYfi i $ w F .J N w1 1f Y1 Yt 1 I 1 ��LC YbijG Ci QO�y O�+w -�tYiLYG� dw.n � O ®YO GGY up g O'6► yY OIY C ►w.q_i Su 4 t-2; L Yv E4 D A ►. 4 M n G. w O p A 0 L^ �S 3�i w ^H w gN Y rN� o 4► �.. �ie�N3 d� ee tom' SSgp G Q w wYr Nwq `V DU� o Q ►A q' � A L aN�$ o ppyfAao .r1 °"' wg�oa i.'.a u�m%Y q La w� aY L.C►+ ` ZEE, Cpl AN.�' Cpl '�LOa F.1 Cyy �YY^A 6 p E. OOH M ��Ow w�O� y~ldN� p^LAG 9�.oN •L �.,C6 -a �. QQ Y pLO. E1% �N YY. 4L NL,y4 L. w`a O 9 + °► Y Nuy O N V �, d i„ O L N D IY C N pl OON HyL G.'t- -h fi YL-d tL1 Vr yb= �9 C =. wr coq A4 t ..o. p-02 dN y.uL Lw $^ ►'.Y,�d i'•Y+c. °Y °N.LY §. rA a,.^a'R`Rgw a0 q q� Y g G 9 y° .G e s �' L+= °' E 4 Iy '$ p u L. V N i} C A .2 .O w l.N Y u- L CU.0 Y A� O y° L MN E� ► ��Mr A CC {bpp� � C L+ O9� Y E oC� • u+ Y U� QA. N A O O V V d C C O N► Y Y ■C ' c° y .au'I. yM. Y1 A. O y V f! LN V Y O �.��N.CN ON- ^D(IIepp 01CdN �.Nww02u. +Ypp ON ► q�. l[E Lq OOLL OI C' L O A WyyW wuO Y�-5-5 d sal U NE rah °c �N�q� �iac p ► ^,e��.ra� E-0 a: �o�4e o� y C A A n► f U .Y O V G � ° 'Mzm.2 . V N.. �■yu �INMYf C M�CYNy°O. YBdN OYOb LAM ff L cM ayy A1r __q {Y� Al U. C Gy i./`M LYLO QM�YM YOV{{ O L �O 0�.Y ►Y YL� _ Cr » U o ^AYSI ^ 9C L^ 6 pY +. YOR- C ► 4� 4A�Y i ir3G6 �.,OiV Vwc. N NNEQ NYL VMwO l4E0 «I =L u O01 �M 4f YAa UA • C� q it' AO Ya4 Y ML cLo" -a ar O Y Yi 6 ens ^' T`. YyM° +• ° }^ ^Y YW .r {.iC r Y ^ 6V L y� CyY YO L Y ►v L °CCV MN c U L 43 YC c Gi.O�UpL Qw C c 'O d o A r N O A ' H L 9 O Cq .Kq G Y E� % -► T d a N N s u s Y ■ L h � M Y w N ° wW aw' u.d.o maw Si, -2 "5'" +i.�d3 {�q° E�S' Y d`y O M`�VM 4 ^ Ci d a q Q =a Opp =t m W Z P �p Q O'er ij tG �„{L°{.. �y 4► H 'aY. >OI Yw (+Y CE.d AwY �"� VAyC it ;M ► L C A+ p y w :5 Ax � Y 4 �r s' 9 -to z° W U i y 28,4 9p? 11= yuy Yi U. pt ^4► A•'C N ►.D OE^ - M.. °�pp■p■ ®gC a +d ^YaHr9Yp MY @°pY4{�j�Yd QO�.0 6C riv� �QY boV/� C Q. °OOs 2N{OyLO��v .°. OI ►t,� `O Y^ q�A >Y 7• �Y aC�e$B us cr\ w CA LS CNC C pp.&IYIY. .Ayn. {{L11 9G�L',�v6 +�v OY ►qaC# O�.c JaP�� r.! ►.DT ^Un AU.� LC Q.V O�C. i C ^ci' ►c YY�,rW Y .a A:. a ^.��� �S 8. -51 �.MU,� „. • `moCw uwYai�Ca NY ` u..° *AL "`oC td ta.ci A�E w� �LCCJ ■Y LO Z s `��N HO.q MON wOYw. ~N G . dG cz VY YYQN'C C 4 .V Vt + +° °L rt^ st 0 1 6 O o .1y C p. G ^h �^GD n . . N�` A a tN�0 1 q CnA 4 N >V . <0 a .�9 � 0 .Y�i. ��' . � N4C G eY yy i i^O► O L is 9 'E Q�Y N-2L4.q u CC9C°.V c 6C Y {Y. r » C V �m+ yLG Y O ► O Ep w A 2 u Y S I M— 9-Ir.S lU O V 0 . 1• ao�o °10 a CC a� cL YG LqM cE au L 6= N M Y YY�f C q9. Y q'6 ��am 6m �y Y.� Y y +fJV9 cqc�Y O O lOQL gi.WM qLq�"GO r i. OO N "� C CQ.IY LL"LCdtlyit O. Y O g P 0 06 N N Y 6LL�T. Lq T d O.O O Y qa�p V TM rYq O O -0.- w O CY g y�O �Y.N�yO�GU %�Vy CUES q G =pC V L � .LC MO qY �yf LY �VYNq YN Y CN c ^ �y'�� �ydU Z fy Y�11 y�Y�N =ONQ11� D "EGN d� NN T 9 ` p gLYp My CYE LqU =C goCy i ygyC t� I NO E"C 04 L5 _ >�LNQQN N��P Dq'O $ qY�N 'C. < 01p 1-i LdYUC MYE C OGIC Nuu ��tL6NyN.NfiiNqO V � g YO � . 5 N i. N rVN 0 NrYyyA r.0 NYy ' c L w iYMY �W64�1 ~ 4 MLY qS. Y. ° °qC.M GS� ANY aY^YO L� I� GYO.wy Q 4 C y.OYN Ara +� q. N Y C C' 8 0 9 CL�ayyaa��� O q y Y. e� y Y g« a dq p 4 p q. N» a qYa Y Y Y P d� B Y g OCC c S 6 0 y! c u q o v^ a y y� V A Y L N L L w G N Y ! N q C � ■ Y LLC ".LL M N y 9 N 0 N Y 6 �I Y A F N E pN N O` Y V G r pN 81 y =■ " V.q O L Yr O O° yGy wpa V ML ; yy r� C y Yy q i C YC C L M Amok oa aver °Ge 't .1 �Zc .- ardc .1 w c c rao® •- Laeivu N ` �Y c� mow L c. O 0 h L Murat' L +.§�svq 'S a a mw s i aD Pd.B qs�o a�ve q w .o a L Ya `? ON °_Q YL r V p p <C Sa �q= ! NC + ■� O`. .��6E_ M GO. Y4app� 4 q c 0 m z pNq aM y" Y G Y" " Z. Y NAY _ 3 -.Y= {� ^q + Cq Y Tai NNG�L: s.5 �'Y L. Y ' a = q rS. 2 �pI c.;4 Y �4g La V ±^ aM Y =f. YN M Y qo`Y C� 'YAY !!q ^CS�q OO iY% ° aC O Y ± %4 C Y L O � .�yp0y. + °t ^. N m _ O^ �V' CL. dy�CO.Y ap ■% . p C r V L Y Y L cc pQTCp V~ O r v V O y r y _ E N y L s o n a� pr M 'it w V ^_ a W C ht l, r .�N ^c1q„ „ N ^ Y V 9 01.p G� Y C� c ONYV aua Oyy �gla 9 y .L 10% v•'v d07 cv q v >VyOO q eyN �9M ^a�q '5t CrtI rY�4p e C Y Y E L C�MO CA�m i b =c i � LN Y p 1�6N L ..5 `Y �C I�G q �SOO = E <.M �Y I Oil 00 W�p�+".fr 1• O Yva 004 . -r°-+c y S L F OPA d4O ���L,T ~OLiI YG. %4Ca.�i pN. �p�eo'� {vc�'tY�`eY� saw° We N J °SAM ` . «° q^ O q w O U �. • F w1��. wdQ6 C H, dYY w� YO6 OYd r C L REN d C 9 V Y� Y p� -03. `0 ., 3 28 04"28% ■ i° �L �W0 V -° y y L° EV�m6 GG�YYeYi Y 28_4 s +c d `a qP N V N Ci L� C9 L U ]1 ° Y CH Yi.ily �a1 l Y 29. C� iiriA �+� « Y 'O'Y Y. oIUJGC a° Y —O if•Y qVtY ^c%c obM W 2828 .y.. «a O0•CJC4 ^ C to ^•C° % Z. YNQ ^GS r4 —C NO'7{'� LAC M Y'= •S N9.�y w.. �Yi Oa6yey Y� 0 uz y.�L C.O' N Y. Y %0«284 Y ^06 N �C NV -y� $� W �Ec SIN'— ^�NA.S �28«� YY Z CY�CY�jj —LAY V t0 m �'i.1N BpLOC • p L qNyy� q�C G� «a 4'`d 2828 4928 J « 4 =LY �INTOwN4' y AO1 w L Y tC Lrtlw o L.Car '. is Y 28�^ LL Y 6 u O ,�CNG CCk Q c Y Y L + G+ T N% 6 a Y O Y. ° C A % Y� e C G% t r L °`. Y C I .V. I��f 6M 'J4[L4N6 OA (o Cib F7 noa51 Hs-, N N 6Yd i— �I 6 �I � op 28.b E NN 4 28« 4 C '.$ L 4 0 r((y.OG C OILM� Y 284 G V. 28 ., ~dy 6 y O irg B La MO .rSNNw Xc 40 Iz u I SG.c «�. 4L% aM.t GS4� —OnS YC> N+ G% ii ry yYy _ C a i L > pwp L —^ � C G — 28 2 a` q b. Eas 7.C Cc Co p wYC C L 18 > r Y J. a p yy■�� 0 1 O° Y T %� G ' C ` s z µ pe2828 C {�0yy T. GsNG"O L~ YC =C c Vy28 NtY OCq O M � O N yC nfl xL% MN— G H —L Y:LM gm nea i.L pp C aY q & —w L o �Io FS Sj: Er S S Y q y� C w C r .61.2 2 0 0 N V I V Y 4 yY Y '°•Q'G GitOt� + fG.a O� O RR �'�•ry a{��ij �y u p —N VL. 1 YYN ChLp� W Y 4 4 28^ � C 28 M — 4 G Y G N � 1 a Eli: i! V■ 4e�1 G..i L° ® UQQ$p28gG I-NO Yr M. 28. J6�28 ml SUN- C Wiy ice }t 11 0 El dr t as p 010 io�c« A a Y C C q N y O C C r0 y v M O L ■ppu ^01pM UFO «uyy9 jp •=fi=e q 4 � L .pO d an = C cc 6C L ? Y O O c� O.tYCA Y i1 yr q^ �f V w 5 �C{ 9 N f! pG c_ 4 ` C L Oil =i.NG1ar Y�4Jp «w' re.EN aL Gy� o ale lci Y ap YO q W yCF rj N p 1rY ^ fY9�' u6I C.5N dyU w a ■u N yNY W Y L Y� M Q O d. L N YrN Yp Q... YLp��C MI OIN CH4 N Y Yy JV W Qom. r y V Cif' a 4C lT ^v YM ^G.«+V �+ ^ �. ac �.': _o °� ✓.-aim � Np �� NN 4p � q q�'��LO wa 7 WO� ■HM I.ai. HMI O. ^ u �[ OY Y001q Yl + p=C�, a O VQ�i11 4N O� Cpi. iN �a8 upp L IM al 4q O¢ O 11t \iJ O 4 qa L Oi 01 `ac c 4 01 Y .r3�e i1 a PC unit `4 S d p ii L wtrli�� YY c. p^N OY mRC a C� p Oy u Cpo0a 01p a N_r0 Nvp ykY+. r.. VER IV 1 3 p� y.0 G 4^ N A N y. �• �yy'O. ... w i `� 'pp�ONC OJM� Yy Y.p yO Y, J� �NG�ALf) q+ p+ � ♦pC��ewOi it bYMp... O> N `.a fON11.•�CO00 G'~4� $ ®Cp NV OY�YY « Y C■y Y V N ��.YM CO 4p b� L L� a�AVE �1 �y 21 �t Jr Y`� � pp� LC Ol`tL ipQ9yOy lVlY IILY ^Y `G 401 w^ LAC ^? V• �G CM 4 +. L0�� O OOIS D� iY1 O p9g1 �p�0y4y �qv� vjNb N _Y� qy ^ M� °p %3 ~ YIVy� a qi5 �� ^E Y$,4~.b � G y s^�4 Np � NY 7� 4� �. o 4^_`11 ° sC� ssLLLd Y;.�YO ffigOY� rVC �• x p� : C pT N eTi'V +, C•_y M ... N $$ Y^ 3la CND C.r 5 ^£p b. "p'. O. L pJ of {r r ■ Cpi„ V bC100'b L C YO a• G 4 Y 1� yyD Vvu 014 Op. O L r Y G C MN 0 01w Y C^ p CJ1 N Y L N C w J O r q Vf 9 L 4 Y O q� `V¢' p� p 0 y' Y�1 iyt V w �[ Y 9 0 Is v `. WI�Vp 4 WYNG 47 f5 Y -0lLi tPw i 4 Q Y —:q7 7 V, « f Y E y Y b y y •��V' L ` OI R Y Y • u. 3r ^Gp�� uc oc�• ° ^ ccge`o :w a. N w � `M ^ �YCyGqp 4�ppN_ A qCC ad O`N aoy = 7 A y OLD iY C iJcY� �Y `44C N d G N L�'jN N NM p i O O q.4°p ar ■ O •• N' • py �� .O� „ N W y @ • Cz • C C^ L ^ O V LL ,C �M N° YN NL Yx � ■YCY■^ �� G A iyLjq .• yp 4yp° O Y OI YV�EW oC yy y 4rj qq ��y 4 O^ 01y p L O + 4 « ONW r •� O e d �„ 6 u Y y 4. 4 L q u C + m + Yyq °pYC+ yyC uG qV♦ C y N L1L L LO^ C MC COaY4 NV ,.. cd� Y I�YV "y Q q L n° ^ N ° 'p ya•N4O Y a: q°�N yS�T •'LOt4 N �L 6' va! Olq 4: COQ q0 N � O ��t• yyL_ iY�y ��V L aY iL1C {�s•�O L. � o° V. �. afM �Y••• y 4 1.� Y�OV aL 7 y�0 ON L� QN Al. Y ✓ L r ° N , L 6 Y pi C 4 t L Y T^ g a µ w -0 Liy ^W q� �^ LY Y �q'OCy y4 ^ �w Y V.O •,,.•� y ;Y L C y C q �1. C L YN. VGC yL4p^ ' YN« `C MW C. q4y °Cq �_Y�QIy N� AY 1N YC Cg Y O 6� Y Y �••�YL q�L L y LyY C4 L �OYY� L NV O V Y ^ M Ov KY > M 6r KNK �,► � Y Wri NL Lt1 7 Y� VO iUO. C ��° wi C4 C L a I"•NVW V p p �LN 4 Z V, « f Y E y Y b y y •��V' L ` OI R Y Y • ` pp LM AIY 01�� T - 041 ON 1 M Y Y OL N G N ^ ^ �YCyGqp 4�ppN_ A Oln �i ad O`N aoy CS 4 yy„ N O yy ppp ^ q 44y i0 `•. C = Y O C Y y C t O NM � °r N �� �� G6�=� cc C V= pCY ■ O Fill C Y Gti A! =NY n, 6MId Y Y ■L CC Cz Go ��4 4 V LL L •� �M N° YN NL Yx � ■YCY■^ �� G S1� gas yp O Y OI N yy y � L iP� 4 n� CL ° t3 ■ 01 N A Y a V, ��� �1 Oli.1 Y�. !• DLl •��V' L §NNW O R �4 L C CN � p ` pp LM AIY 01�� T - 041 ON 1 'Valli `Z CC q L L wo OL N G N -aDIId ^ �YCyGqp 4�ppN_ A as X019 t^ ° ,p s_ a sic_ m ON i.S ,CY •\ C ~ FO g _L Y^ On Oa 7 N Y C \^ jr N �� �� G6�=� �N► V= pCY ■ O V, ��� •0... Oli.1 Y�. !• DLl •��V' L §NNW O CyO- O y- Y �4 L C CN � p ` pp LM AIY 01�� T - 041 ON pA � •^..: L C yy `Z CC q L L wo OL N G N �J �R{� ^ �YCyGqp 4�ppN_ A >�o L�ppN ^O.MQQ X019 t^ ° ,p s_ a sic_ i.S ,CY •\ C ~ FO g _L Y^ On Oa 7 N Y C \^ jr N �� �� G6�=� �N► V= pCY ■ O \ N Y Gti A! =NY n, 6MId NpW q^ 46W 11 El El p L L L � V O� v« a —e as � 9 N ° °N d — �y O M ° C O N Y. t. L «yg 1r u Y N y �I as 4 S b w M J O o�N =s' �Lx J ^ yy •� j I c�N LV D d od +� QI C ..M^ ° �O w u0 y Y 6« •e °a Ty y8 —oSc 9 Y C « Y ^ =Q V 01 S M- N Y •4 Q= a c` °u `yeL Y. U �w .w MIN: N 3j II D NY o— + y V ydC Q.t7o SOY cspt cC VJ� MaH IY. NVW Y M 4 O O V V c C a Y y C 3 M Y ° l .cp5� vYau,� ■�AL Ye V^ « «N U U C 55- o Ms \Y G P <�o•:• � YS �, C 1Y• s$l c K^ Zm +. ryry Vp y •tU� �y IL- M a L z r• Y L C :. Y` yy s • N ^ ^ 4uY � ^ CC gY °ppa ■� «4 C �pp 9�v�« 6� Y+ LY1C U M. 6W &w cs iNZ. V �� W � L° LLC F— o— + y V ydC Q.t7o SOY cspt cC VJ� V6L �6 Y s " t - =' ° M .rs oL Soo �°f =o Y Y 9 Y ^`°"o C 3 M Y ° l vYau,� ■�AL Yy° Y V^ « «N U U C 55- o Ms \Y .55= U O G Y 1Yyp. C •'� D ` M Y Y G. O aqqE J Y Y c K^ Zm .°. VV pp Ng ,C O^ N M N Ill .: N p �I. ' rl ,l 1 f I 1 1 e ti CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 26, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission PROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner SUBJECT: RECREWONAL VEHICLE STORAGE o Review of current City regulations affecting storage and parking of RVs on private residential propeeties, (Continued from J+tly 25, 1990.) Since the last time the planning Commission discussed this issue, the Public Safety Commission has reviewed the safety- related aspects . associated with the parking of RVs on private property. The public Safety Commission listened to public testimony and requested staff to provide additional information for future review,. The items being discussed by the Public Safety Commission are sightlines, slope conditions, and other safety considerations. Up to this point, no decisions have been made. However, the Public Safety Commission did express concerns with potential safety problems should RV parking in front yards be unrestricted. As of this writing, staff had scheduled a meeting with the RV group representatives to discuss issues which we know are of concern to both Commissions and to exchange ideas. At the Planning Commission meeting staff will present a brief oral update, With a more formal discussion to take place at a futur-- meeting. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:OK /jfs lei S t